The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-05-07 City Council Regular Meeting PacketAgenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, May 7, 2019 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments B.Meeting Handout V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular Meetings of April 16, 2019 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Approve Encroachment Agreement at 6650 Parkwood Road D.Approve Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement with Orion 4500 France, LLC E.Request for Purchase: Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services F.Request for Purchase: Valley View Road Sidewalk Phase 2 G.Request for Purchase: Vegetated Stormwater Best Management Practices Program Services H.Request for Purchase: Lincoln Drive Trail Improvements I.Approve Summary Publication of Ordinance Nos. 2019-08 and 2019-09 VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: National Police Week 2019 B.Proclamation: Emergency Medical Services Week C.Canadian Paci@c Rail Regional Trail Draft Master Plan VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eAcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for O'Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-32 White Oaks C Street Reconstruction Reassessment C.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-33 Public Drainage & Utility Easement Vacation at 4901 W. 77th Street D.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-34 Public Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation at 5901 Lincoln Drive E.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-35 Site Plan Review for 7725 Washington Avenue, Self Storage Facility F.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-36 Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Hardware G.PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Approve Recommendation for Residential Recycling Request for Proposal B.Approve Comprehensive Housing Strategy Task Force IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Receive Petition Requesting Street Reconstruction of Woodland Road and Brookview Avenue with Curb & Gutter and Storm Sewer Improvements B.Correspondence C.Minutes 1.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission March 14, 2019 2.Minutes: Transportation Commission, March 21, 2019 3.Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission March 26, 2019 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor And Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments A.2019 Q1 Finance Quarterly Report XIII.City Council Upcoming Meetings and Events XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli@cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Manager Neal to respond to community comments from the previous City Council meeting. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Meeting Handout CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Meeting Handout April 28, 2019 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, As residents who live on West 58th Street, we have been participating in the city's community feedback process and we are writing to express our needs and concerns for the reconstruction process. As a residential neighborhood we are focused on safety and community. We are a neighborhood that includes Pamela Park, a major park the city has invested heavily in, and multiple schools (Concord and Normandale Elementary Schools, Southview Middle School, the Edina Family Center and the Edina Community Center). We enjoy all the amenities the neighborhood has to offer and what they bring. We travel around by car, on foot and by bike as do others who visit or travel through our neighborhood. Sharing the road is important, but so is our neighborhood. In addition to the speed and volume of cars we experience each day, we have a steep, blind- sight hill between Wooddale Ave and Philbrook Lane which causes concern for all users. We want to make sure as we share the road, and construction designs are being finalized, the reconstruction is done in a safe and community-minded manner. Through our participation, we have concerns about the city's approach to reconstructing West 58th Street, and we want to make sure the city seriously considers the neighborhood's concerns. The "Initial Design" presented to us does not adequately address the safety of the community. Below are the 13 areas we are addressing in this letter which is followed by our rationale on adjacent pages. 1. Concrete sidewalk, north side for pedestrians only. 2. Bike lanes on street or diverted through either/or Pamela Park and Philbrook Lane. 3. Maintain some areas of parking along 58th Street, on the south side. 4. Alert drivers to blind intersection on hill. 5. No round-about at the entrance of Pamela Park at Philbrook Lane. 6. Preserve as many trees as possible. 7. Flashing light cross-walk, pedestrian activated, at 58th & Philbrook Lane located at the entrance to Pamela Park. 8. Narrow lanes and posted speed limit signs with flashing monitors, like those found on 70th Street and Interlachen to reduce speeds. 9. Concern about additional loss of driveway space. 10. Additional lights by Pamela Park. 11. Eliminate flooding on 58th at bottom of hill and by park. 12. Preserve wildlife between Brookview Ave and Halifax Ave. 13. Additional community design review. Kindly, Residents of West 58th Street (Signature Sheet Attached) Neighborhood Rationale / Concrete sidewalk, north side for pedestrians only. Safety is a key priority for the neighborhood. With so many people of all ages, especially children, traveling along 58th Street, we don't believe bikes and pedestrians belong on the same path in proximity to a steep blind hill. People can't see who is on the other side of the hill until they reach the crest and by that time, it is too late for a biker to safely avoid hitting a pedestrian. Neighbors also do not like the aesthetic or impact on property involved in an 8-foot bituminous path. 2 Bike lanes on street or diverted through either/or Pamela Park and Philbrook Lane. Pamela Park has a bituminous path accessible on both West 58th Street and West 62nd Street. The path safely weaves through the park and would provide a safe way for people to travel around the neighborhood on their bike. Alternatively, or in addition to, bikers could be directed onto Philbrook Lane via Wooddale Ave and at the entrance of the park. Philbrook Lane allows bikers to avoid the steep, blind of sight hill and easily travel around the hill. Bikers could decide to bike on West 58th Street if they choose not to follow the designated bike path. 3 Maintain some areas of parking along 58th Street, on the south side. Currently the city is planning on removing all parking along West 58th Street. With the increased activity at Pamela Park and visitors to residents, we need to maintain as much parking as possible. Between Brookview Ave and the entrance of the Pamela Park, there is a large section of land, most of which is city property which could be indented to allow for additional parking spaces for residents and visitors. This additional parking would only impact one resident's yard who supports putting additional parking along this part of West 58th Street. 4 Alert drivers to blind intersection on hill. Currently there are no traffic signs alerting people that they are approaching a blind intersection. It is dangerous not to alert drivers. With more people expected to cross West 58th Street for parking purposes, or for potential bikers, a shared road must inform users of road hazards to avoid potential traffic injuries. 5 No round-about at the entrance of Pamela Park at Philbrook Lane. Round-abouts are designed to reduce speeds and calm traffic. While we have observed a significant increase in traffic and speeds, we don't believe a round-about is the answer. Round-abouts are not designed for pedestrians to cross an intersection safely. Additionally, several round-abouts in Edina have plants in the middle (or large amounts of snow in the winter) which prevents a driver from seeing who is on the other side forcing the driver to slow down. Once in the intersection, a driver could not see if anyone was already walking in the intersection creating an unsafe intersection. We believe there are other ways to reduce speed in the neighborhood. 6 Preserve as many trees as possible. The are a significant number of trees aligning West 58th Street and we want to preserve as many of them with the addition of a sidewalk. We want the city to take as much care to gently weave the sidewalk around the trees, as done between Wooddale Ave and Concord Ave on West 58th Street. We understand there are ADA regulations the city must adhere to. However, the city has demonstrated its ability to preserve trees with a gently weaving sidewalk. 7 Flashing light cross-walk, pedestrian activated, at 58th & Philbrook Lane located at the entrance to Pamela Park. With the elimination of parking along West 58th Street and the increased overflow parking on Philbrook Lane from activities at Pamela Park, we want designated crosswalks added. Additionally, at the entrance of Pamela Park, Oaklawn Ave and Kellogg Ave, we want people to be able to safely walk across the street. The city has added flashing light cross-walks, which are pedestrian activated, around the city to allow pedestrians to alert drivers they are in the crosswalk and safely cross the street. We need this in our neighborhood to safely help pedestrians cross West 58th Street at high volume or blind intersections. 8 Narrow lanes and posted speed limit signs with flashing monitors, like those found on 70th Street and Interlachen to reduce speeds. West 58th Street has a speeding problem. One of the major contributing factors is the fact that there are no posted speed limit signs between Wooddale Ave and France Ave. With a significant hill, drivers routinely fly down the hill heading eastbound and speed up to get up the hill heading westbound. When police have placed their speed trailers out by the park, we have observed drivers slowing down when shown their speed. For the safety of the residents and visitors, and in an effort to appropriately manage speed through the neighborhood, we believe posted speed limit signs with flashing monitors are the best way to manage speed in our neighborhood. 9 Concern about additional loss of driveway space. Several driveways along West 58th Street have limited space. The proposed reconstruction appears to be severely reducing if not eliminating the ability to park a car in a resident's driveway. The city needs to be careful to not eliminate a resident's use of their own driveway. As the design progress is underway, it is important for property owners to understand the potential and final impact to their property. We are asking the city to setup one-on-one meetings with residents to review the potential and address individual property owner's concerns. Once the final design has been completed, the city should meet with property owners to discuss any changes from the proposed designs. We believe one-on-one interviews are the most effective way to keep residents informed and address individual needs. 10 Additional lights by Pamela Park. There is not enough lighting by Pamela Park which is a safety issue. We want to have the city install additional lights by the park that do not negatively impact neighbors who live along the park (i.e. the light won't shine into their houses). 11 Eliminate flooding on 58th at bottom of hill and by Pamela Park. The city needs to address the grading of the road and the flooding that regularly occurs on West 58th Street. During some of the community meetings, proposals were presented that may or may not appropriately address flooding. We want the city to assess the road for runoff and present options to the neighborhood before finalizing a solution to eliminate flooding on the road. 12 Preserve wildlife between Brookview Ave and Halifax Ave. We have seen an increase of wildlife deaths due to the increased traffic on West 58th Street. Wildlife play an important role in our community and we need to take steps to preserve them, especially during construction. Only one underground turtle tunnel has been proposed during community meetings. We are asking the city to provide recommendations to reduce the deaths of wildlife between Brookview Ave and Halifax. 13 Additional community design review. This project has brought to light many issues for the city and residents. We firmly believe an additional community design review before a final plan is presented is appropriate in this situation. Signature Page West 58th Street April 26 Letter Page Name (print) Name (signature) Address Date Yes = Support 1-13 Yes, support except # . Email Record Doplui\- (G--f-tf. ' Lict()-i-t W c-F.3+t'Ssi- / I//01-k i 1 1 tc Avvv-i-fho gm4 I NIP iCctic,11,- 7— , ,ev Ck .. 5 So i, K o Li/ ovr 11 u e til--gliy 5AokL 0lek,lit- )4 il 0 u eipfr/i) Jess KQ Schcualeri 4. 1 /' htda-O-PA- Liaco Ph'ilbcc..) (-daiicl kb k 5-6' l,4, , ,___ ,. Li 00 6,14., k Lib 1 2.6.Po.4 AiLi - ---) - , . , 2 L-- ( _ei,eifr7 3q;7/:: CO , 5e-'< .diyi. • i Q,J4- , • • u? 4e- (( i:- (-47419 , \. e i r ri A - ,:\!,,AILJ.c...,,,(,— 39 3._-ws 2c Tl_ cilc\:31b) tAk\-ctc>k' 6y.0. 0u iyi k 04. ,L)..\,, .F._c_svo,..i \ 3T41-- (,..) (6 /, Le-SI ,t 35L)-k te....,.— 11 ( 1 zji,Ali 11 I( 'c\(\oN . v•r",\2\ -- ( , Se‘‘C L3 'c‘e q iv/h mo\\A.e-Aiz-xf -c- ' 5 e&o.-- Gdb ,.) :_.._ li-z.,4). _cP14' E74 /ks-/ir se_o_t ..6 - dyirfrwE PcvAcu;•_0L. )\ atL43 .' .311-2_ IA) . 4"('') „9- L\ '1 11 afkr10.00, . oflio\oly-ci,.@ TA Cs Signature Page West 58t11 Street April 26 Letter Page Name (print) Name (signature) Address Date Yes = Support 1-13 Yes, support except # . Email Record C, riA C (ii ( • , , ..) 'N'i C5 .3 I-L.51:- VIC( A \;sS(A. -1' arelIci • '‘ . 4131 (,0 4C+1/` c±. ye•-• A-v\v\i• Motc,VimAon ii. j\i fivilViAl--=--- ii). v\I - .-Ttyl- Ci • z I - I 26 1440t616;lewkoviAlflitO9v14,6(A Soto...il 67:5-. kJ i's$v) .ii '7(A44L4/?---- 441-08- h) . 5.1s711:--i S.+ `07d/q 0, t)e_J-te-toi'gewki, , 41-0,, ,.;) C 16-1- i L Signature Page West 58th Street April 26 Letter Page Name (print) Name (signature) Address Date Yes = Support 1-13 Yes, support except # . Email Record 1.-e-f-/U'l t/-e-- CrZ)C.)---'-t-- _,(A.c1A-12-(---7k.f54-- q 3 1 , - 2 _ ( A _ ) . ' k- .. V2,_ 9?-•)f--_,---- ) /,,,'‘cdr__Lic6.,) fl.--,_-,c '51q _C____ 0 .--._) 1-114 4 6 te_re—alit%/P _ , „ — 6/116: g-.'4 ,7. Avt, 575 Y e .s , ev..-Ke-1/4- 5 "e5 ( -1C)S-1)3 ISP'5-hi6( ) 1--i45- A.r..( ( e-I-tc/s.T o P144te—c—IK-e v ja,UttA -.:1,-,,\4.-.. Po-L\-el\ L.J',:, ir3•35'w 5-Y S k C/ •5-- .2. 77 • --z- , - - - .N--, -5-7., - \ • _ 5 , C (--- - 1--, .--- ) ?c : 1 , ,,,A..:te ' 5/ Signature Page West 58th Street April 26 Letter Page Name (print) Name (signature) Address Date Yes = support 1-13 Yes support except # • Email Record -... i ---. d Aattij t t----01A6c13 -4-S" 2,4 ,,N.) ,ST :Cwt <51 7-c---.:: \ok„ i ,lk.-L 8 --vi -...0ArciAA ,30", Al,-- k;-'-f _I i' j,-,; 1,, -1 I/ ' , i 1-e5 Signature Page West 58t1 Street April 26 Letter Page `7) Name (print) Name (signature) Address Date Yes = Support 1-13 Yes, support except Email Record # . .. 4.---- • r _ .. • , . . , I ' . -. .--... -- - S s-...,.( . ,,, 1 c e i,.4 .. r• I ,....., 1 2.... 'IC S ' 1 2 ttk,, - , 1) n .,- „,j-t_‹--.• -E-..24„, ,---E-- \---,,•s.— ..4 \-1:-_. ..) K 5k -.71 1:.3 c i 'I-- ...; 4 ' :; . , . ' ..7 ...) .....Trt .....> 1. ) ! .1 C4--t-J4.-: (,),!-A--')Iri C t C )1.4 ,./ ,.. 1.:I'' ; /-4-/ 4:1).) V i ) ') 1) °C))) ''s-.. ' 1; ---) cl) - ' '.•'--1' , f''' '',,,LAt\\\,)( l' '4,-c--x-_—\ .1 . ,/ ; ,t - • i ,.,i k %.., ---i,:e. -. ,:-\.),...._-; n,../ ‘,.) 'N---" r- 1 'Thk ,71".. L. i.ili :1,,,,. ,:\ "it t L. i ( % ,, '''t / "' ' - •' ' • --' • \ ,,,,,-, I i /2 • ) I -'” 7 i l) L. ,-- --, • %.• 1 7. 1 , • — ' - ' • Signature Page West 58th Street April 26 Letter Page Name (print) __,(."- 6 cLift... L ,..), !> (lc-v._ Name (signature) / z,--- c____s___. .--...:._...- — _____ . a i 1 Address cf. z_2( L<_; "S--af-L\ S-,-;-- Date ---; / ,--) — Yes = support 1-13 Yes support except # Email Record 2( t.c.A,Ift, Li)0'. LQ11 -6,,5/7 pt,te , (pd(,____ q320 W, 5S 54- x e S Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular Meetings of April 16, 2019 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Minutes: Work Session, April 16, 2019 Draft Minutes: Regular Meeting, April 16, 2019 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 16, 2019 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Anderson, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Absent: Member Fischer. Staff in attendance: Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Sharon Allison, City Clerk; Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner; Kaylin Eidness, Senior Communications Coordinator; Casey Casella, City Management Fellow; and Roger Knutson, City Attorney. CLOSED SESSION: Attorney-Client Privilege Regarding Litigation Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to close the meeting as allowed under Mn. Stat. 13D.05 Subd. 3. (b) for attorney-client privilege to discuss Robert Webb v. City of Edina Heritage Preservation Commission, City of Edina and Sharri Harmel lawsuit. Ayes: Brindle, Anderson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Attorneys Katherine Swenson and John Baker, Greene Espel PLLP, and Brian Gaviglio, Litigation Manager, League of Minnesota Cities, updated the Council on the Robert Webb v. City of Edina Heritage Preservation Commission, City of Edina and Sharri Harmel. MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to move back into open session. Ayes: Brindle, Anderson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. QUARTERLY WORK PLAN UPDATES – Received “CONNECTING WITH COUNCIL” ON THE BETTER TOGETHER WEBSITE Staff in attendance: MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator Ms. Lamon and Ms. Eidness explained how this new communication tool, ‘Connecting with Council,’ would allow the Council to communicate with the public to reach a wider demographic. They explained that Council could communicate anytime, on any subject and have two-way conversations with the public. The tool would not be used for personal conversations, replace public meetings, or correspondence to Council. A second communication tool was ‘Notes from Council,’ that would allow each Council to share information with the public (one-way). Council would decide when and what to share. JOINT MEETING: ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION (EEC) Commissioners in attendance: Carolyn Jackson, Chair; Lauren Satterlee, Vice Chair; and Melissa Seeley, and staff liaison Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator. Chair Jackson, Vice Chair Satterlee and Commissioner Seeley updated the Council on the EEC’s 2019 Work Plan. Items to note: thanked the Council for passing organics recycling and stated that outreach would begin soon to educate the community, create a program to recognize businesses that were taking measures to reduce energy use, change the Tom Oye Award to recognize multiple individuals, work with students and review best practices to draft a pollinator resolution, and create a Climate Action Plan. The Commission and Council briefly Edina City Council Work Session/April 16, 2019 discussed work plan item Edina Large Building Benchmarking – exploring large building energy benchmarking and energy assessment policies to support community goals and building investment – Chair Jackson explained that Edina was a pilot city in the Hennepin County Benchmarking Collaborative which provides guidance, best practices, and technical support on benchmarking programs. Chair Jackson explained how the City was already conducting benchmarks on city facilities and the data would be available to the public in August. Additionally, the EEC planned to present a benchmarking ordinance to the Council on May 7 to begin gathering data in 2020 from buildings 50,000 sq. ft. and larger, to be followed by 2021 for buildings 25-50,000 sq. ft. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, May 7, 2019. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 16, 2019 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Absent: Member Fischer. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda as amended, removing Items V.M. and V.O. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Avenue South, commented about recent fire engine purchases and his concerns about useful life versus early replacement than previously done and suggested publication of the City’s justification for its actions. IV.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Assistant Manager Schaefer responded to past Community Comments. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items V.M., Ordinance No. 2019-09; Repealing and Replacing Sections 24-51 and 24-53 of the Edina City Code Concerning Small Cell Wireless Facility Aesthetic Standards, and V.O., Request for Purchase: Arden Park Playground Replacement: V.A. Approve minutes of the April 2, 2019, Work Session and Regular Meetings and April 6, 2019, Town Hall meeting V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown as per pre-list dated April 4, 2019, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $121,274.96, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $6,121.00, Conservation & Sustainability $562.50, PIR Debt Service Fund $1,250.00, Equipment Replacement Fund $4,193.35, Art Center Fund $1,351.40, Golf Dome Fund $6,273.42, Aquatic Center Fund $326.14, Golf Course Fund $46,929.56, Ice Arena Fund $4,206.95, Sports Dome Fund $10,652.26, Edinborough Park Fund $9,951.86, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $124.65, Liquor Fund $180,985.51, Utility Fund $49,991.34, Storm Sewer Fund $16,272.87, PSTF Agency Fund $3,434.98, MN Task Force 1 Fund $21,000.00, HRA Administration $21,603.50, Southdale 2 District $6,250.00, 50th and France 2 TIF District $6,422.78: Total $519,719.03; and per electronic payment register dated April 4, 2019, and consisting of 5 pages: General Fund $45,819.71, Working Capital Fund $1,224.00, Golf Course Fund $689.10, Ice Arena Fund $2,480.57, Edinborough Park Fund $6,692.39, Liquor Fund $8,882.27, Utility Fund $824.62, Storm Sewer Fund $4,226.00, PSTF Agency Fund $163.70: Total $71,002.36; and per pre-list dated April 11, 2019, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $239,499.40, Police Special Revenue $646.73, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $3,266.65, Conservation & Sustainability $3,412.50, Working Capital Fund $76,500.02, Equipment Replacement Fund $29,429.00, Art Center Fund $8,791.21, Golf Dome Minutes/Edina City Council/April 16, 2019 Page 2 Fund $2,451.65, Aquatic Center Fund $842.14, Golf Course Fund $29,341.35, Ice Arena Fund $27,465.44, Sports Dome Fund $409.61, Edinborough Park Fund $11,819.51, Centennial lakes Park Fund $2,631.00, Liquor Fund $197,418.84, Utility Fund $493,448.14, Storm Sewer Fund $28,347.17, PSTF Agency Fund $2,017.58, MN Task Force 1 Fund $47,993.16, HRA Administration $170.00, Valley View/Wooddale TIF District $10,342.40: Total $1,216,243.60; and per electronic payment register dated April 11, 2019, and consisting of 6 pages: General Fund $45,778.57, PIR Construction Fund $8,370.00, Art Center Fund $40.50, Aquatic Center Fund $24.07, Golf Course Fund $641.73, Ice Arena Fund $4,411.69, Sports Dome Fund $179.42, Edinborough Park Fund $3,075.17, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $555.84, Liquor Fund $11,174.02, Utility Fund $8,093.10: Total $82,344.11; and per credit card transactions dated January 26-February 25, 2019, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $32,535.63, Police Special Revenue $657.18, Arts and Culture Fund $276.38, Working Capital Fund $594.65, Equipment Replacement Fund $124.86, Art Center Fund $228.03, Golf Dome Fund $175.36, Golf Course Fund $6,334.40, Ice Arena Fund $983.38, Edinborough Park Fund $1,509.40, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,973.16, Liquor Fund $3,331.88, PSTF Agency Fund $520.83, Mn Task Force 1 Fund $4,772.22 Total $54,017.36 V.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2019-30 Providing for the Sale of $12,740,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2019A V.D. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Two 2020 Ford Police Interceptor Utilities, Ford of Hibbing, $36,224.34 V.E. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, 2019 Street Reconstruction Turf Restoration, Friedges Contracting, Inc. $226,807.50 V.F. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Braemar Golf Course Wetland Monitoring Services, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. $39,112 V.G. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Stormwater Best Management Practices Inspection and Maintenance Program Services, Barr Engineering Company $37,000 V.H. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Yorktown Park Sanitary Sewer Design and Bid Services, SEH, Inc. $70,638.00 V.I. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, 77th Street CIPP Sanitary Sewer Emergency Repair, Insituform $31,120.00 V.J. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Phase 5 Sanitary Sewer Capacity Expansion at Millennium Site, Rachel Contracting $110,795.00 V.K. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Traffic Signal Equipment and ADA Improvements at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, Millerbernd Manufacturing Company $39,892.00 V.L. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, 2019 Commodities, Commercial Asphalt, Cemstone, Hawkins, ESS, and All Around Concrete as outlined in Quote Form V.M. Ordinance No. 2019-09; Repealing and Replacing Sections 24-51 and 24-53 of the Edina City Code Concerning Small Cell Wireless Facility Aesthetic Standards V.N. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Centennial Lakes Pathway Replacement, T.A.G. Construction Inc. $98,120 V.O. Request for Purchase: Arden Park Playground Replacement V.P. Adopt Resolution No. 2019-29: Authorizing Hennepin County Brownfields Gap Financing Program Grant Application for Amundson Flats V.Q. Approve New On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Shake Shack V.R. Approve Transportation Commission Appointment, Jill Plumb-Smith V.S. Approve Amendment to Donations, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy Rollcall: Minutes/Edina City Council/April 16, 2019 Page 3 Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA V.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2019-09; REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS 24-51 AND 24-53 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITY AESTHETIC STANDARDS – ADOPTED The Council said this ordinance related to small cell wireless infrastructure in the City, metropolitan area, and throughout the country that would provide the necessary groundwork for 5G cell technology. It was noted this proposed legislation for the FCC’s regulations limited city’s ability to bill back contractors. The Council indicated the ordinance was clearer, helped outline what contractors could do, and encouraged the public to contact their legislators regarding the proposed legislation. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance 2019-09 Repealing and Replacing Sections 24-51 and 24-53 of the Edina City Code Concerning Small Wireless Facility Aesthetic Standards. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V.O. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE: ARDEN PARK PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT – APPROVED The Council asked questions regarding the cost difference for a fully accessible park in this location similar to Rosland Park so there were fully accessible parks on both the south and north sides of the City. Parks and Recreation Assistant Director Faus said a fully accessible park would result in an additional $135,000 then spoke about the need for additional parking for such a park. She said possible locations included Wooddale Park, Highlands Park, and Pamela Park as they had sufficient parking and were in need of equipment replacement and would be included in the proposed CIP for next year’s consideration. The Council indicated it liked Wooddale Park as an option more so than Highland Park and suggested Webber Park be considered in the future as well. Member Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, approving request for purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Landscape Structures $117,305.20, Arden Park playground equipment replacement. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI.A. NATIONAL KIDS TO PARKS DAY – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation for National Kids to Parks Day on May 18, 2019, and encouraged residents to use local parks and recreation sites to develop more active, healthy lifestyles. Johnny and Kelly Sprague shared comments about their favorite parks and accepted the Proclamation. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving proclamation recognizing National Kids to Parks Day. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES: COUNCILMEMBER STAUNTON FOR SERVICE TO THE LEAGUE BOARD – RECOGNIZED Luke Fisher, Deputy Director of League of Minnesota Cities shared the work of the League that represented 833 cities under the direction of the Board that helped cities partner and provided clear leadership. He thanked Member Staunton for his work and contributions over the past three years that helped steer the Board. Minutes/Edina City Council/April 16, 2019 Page 4 D. Love, Centerville Councilmember and League of Minnesota Cities Board Member, thanked Member Staunton for his work and opinions that were well respected, thoughtful, and helped guide initiatives like race and equity. He commented how Minnesota was considered one of the top Leagues in the country and Member Staunton’s stance on the importance of civic engagement and meeting people where they were. A round of applause was offered by the audience. VI.C. ARBOR DAY 2019 – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation for Arbor Day 2019. City Forester Overholt accepted the Proclamation and invited residents to the April 26 Arbor Day event at Countryside Park that would be celebrated with the planting of nine new trees to replace existing Ash trees. He then spoke about strategies that addressed Emerald Ash borer, the remaindering work at Arden Park, and tree replacement strategies along with buckthorn removal. The Council asked questions about dead tree removal in an area of water along Braemar Boulevard. Mr. Overholt explained staff cut hazardous trees from this area that would be removed. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, approving proclamation recognizing Arbor Day 2019. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D. BUILDING SAFETY MONTH 2019 – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation for Building Safety Month. Chief Building Official Fischer accepted the Proclamation and thanked the Council for its support of staff by providing tools such as permit software and electronic plan review that made staff more efficient. The Council thanked staff for their continued education and implementation of green building practices and current building codes. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving proclamation recognizing Building Safety Month 2019. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH FRANCE EQUITIES, LLC, FOR 7200-7250 FRANCE AVENUE – APPROVED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf shared a brief introduction of the redevelopment of property at 7200-7250 France Avenue and said the full Redevelopment Agreement had been prepared based on the terms and conditions approved by the HRA and City Council in February 2019 with assistance by Dorsey and Whitney and Ehlers and Associates. He said there were no changes since last week then outlined criteria of the developer and their future obligations to the City only upon successful completion of project. The Council inquired about the construction firm then shared comments about the $12 million TIF note that contained in total $28.4 million with $10.7 million in interest that would be paid by the City and concerns of the continuation of affordability beyond the outlined 15 years. The Council spoke about not needing to commit at this time as the funds could be used for other affordable housing options and identify a device to offset the interest costs. The Council also spoke about private market struggles but how this was an opportunity to help offset the City’s interest expense, noting the City should not pay interest on money we have not borrowed. The Council shared comments about the financial gap and how the project clearly satisfied the but/for test as it would not move forward without the TIF assistance and therefore would not create new affordable housing or provide eligible items that were reimbursable. The Council spoke about other benefits such as Minutes/Edina City Council/April 16, 2019 Page 5 a new vision for Southdale, separation of super blocks into 200-foot segments, 45% land area dedication to public use, trees preservation, and no risk to the City as it would be completed on a pay as you go basis. The Council noted this action would still keep the City below 4% of tax capacity of TIF amounts and provide hidden parking, transition, dedication of public realm, and a great project. The Council noted the property was blighted and the project would increase property values enough to make the project viable and could be paid off even faster than 20 years which would reduce interest costs. Mr. Neuendorf referred to the look back provision that ensured review of actual costs before issuance of the note so should the project cost less than estimated, the City could scale back its level of assistance. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the Redevelopment Agreement with France Equities, LLC, for 7200-7250 France Avenue and authorize staff to implement the terms of the agreement. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Nays: Anderson Motion carried. VII.B. ORDINANCE 2019-08: AMENDING CHAPTERS 10 AND 30 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING TREES – ADOPTED Parks and Natural Resources Assistant Director Swenson shared proposed amendments based on the need to address Emerald Ash borer concerns and how the changes would allow staff to perform the necessary duties as current language only referenced Dutch elm and oak wilt. He explained the amendment would add all tree and plant pests and noted ash trees were not defined as protected during construction and redevelopment. The Council thanked staff for the proposed changes and confirmed that tree inspector was an additional role and not a new position. Mr. Overholt said the action was needed in order to remove diseased trees and was broader to include any future identified pests. The Council asked if staff provided resident assistance regarding trees. Mr. Overholt said he provided resident inspections of elm, oaks, and ash trees to help preserve them as long as possible. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant second reading adopting Ordinance No. 2019-08 amending Chapters 10 and 30 of the Edina City Code concerning trees. Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. RESOLUTION 2019-31 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS – ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2019-31 accepting various grants and donations. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE - Received Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES – Received 1. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, DECEMBER 10, 2018 AND JANUARY 14, 2019 2. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, MARCH 12, 2019 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received Minutes/Edina City Council/April 16, 2019 Page 6 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XI.A. COUNCIL CONNECTION AND VIRTUAL TOWN HALL XII. CITY COUNCIL UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 7, 2019. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the April 16, 2019, meeting available. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 04.18.19-05.02.19 TOTAL $2,124,467.69 Electronic Payment Register Dated 04.18.19-05.02.19 TOTAL $272,178.72 INTRODUCTION: Claim information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 04.18.19-05.02.19 TOTAL $2,124,467.69 Electronic Payment Register Dated 04.18.19-05.02.19 TOTAL $272,178.72 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:10R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 4/20/20184/20/2018 - Company Amount 502,823.1301000GENERAL FUND 3,170.8802300POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 13,956.8402500PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 905.8702700CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 26,200.2404000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 17,704.0004100PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 55,498.7104200EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 5,341.1005100ART CENTER FUND 98.6205200GOLF DOME FUND 5,984.2205300AQUATIC CENTER FUND 211,898.8905400GOLF COURSE FUND 77,094.5005500ICE ARENA FUND 11,159.4805550SPORTS DOME FUND 27,608.4405700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 14,586.9405750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 395,696.4805800LIQUOR FUND 120,606.0505900UTILITY FUND 16,455.2605930STORM SEWER FUND 40,461.4805950RECYCLING FUND 396,300.8106000RISK MGMT ISF 22,402.7207400PSTF AGENCY FUND 87,101.0407500MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 29,982.2609210HRA ADMINISTRATION 1,582.1709232CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 9,300.0009235VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 2,147.5009238SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 15,119.830924350TH AND FRANCE 2 TIF DISTRICT 13,280.2309900PAYROLL FUND Report Totals 2,124,467.69 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434346 4/18/2019 105696 3CMA 255.00 3CMA SAVVY ENTRIES 488013 INV-33 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 255.00 434347 4/18/2019 100609 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 500.00 488177 2500 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 488177 2500 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 488177 2500 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 434348 4/18/2019 142327 56 BREWING, LLC 365.00 488178 5606064 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 365.00 434349 4/18/2019 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 55.39 NEW HOSE 488436 213507-001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.39 434350 4/18/2019 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 143.00 488179 9305 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 143.00 434351 4/18/2019 129458 ACME TOOLS 325.00 488015 6518561 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 705.86 488016 6518563 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 710.00 488014 6519197 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 136.00 REPLACEMENT POWER TOOLS 488445 6528207 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 95.27 DRIVE ADAPTER KIT 488446 6528225 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 389.30 TOOL JS/BS 488450 6528230 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,361.43 434352 4/18/2019 143143 ACT CLEANING SERVICE 948.56 HORNETS NEST LOCKER CLEANING 488180 INV-1050 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,906.00 CLEANING SERVICE 488180 INV-1050 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,854.56 434353 4/18/2019 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 185.54 MERCHANDISE 488017 907122384 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 118.66 STAFF UNIFORM 488020 907178454 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 400.21 MERCHANDISE 488018 907211449 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 49.05 MERCHANDISE 488019 907211515 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434353 4/18/2019 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY Continued... 753.46 434354 4/18/2019 144698 ADAM GRUETZMACHER 21.00 GIFT SHOP SALE 488388 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.00 434355 4/18/2019 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN 2.37 GIFT SHOP SALES 488021 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.37 434356 4/18/2019 143557 ADIDAS AMERICA INC. 432.00 MERCHANDISE 488024 6177465753 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 108.00 MERCHANDISE 488023 6177476174 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 495.50 STAFF UNIFORMS 488022 6177496337 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,035.50 434357 4/18/2019 140318 ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND 1,330.00 488473 62669 05564.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Water Treatment Plant #5 1,330.00 434358 4/18/2019 144688 ALANNA BERGLAND 149.00 REFUND SUMMER SOCCER SHOTS 488370 041019 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 149.00 434359 4/18/2019 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 4.80 GIFT SHOP SALES 488025 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.80 434360 4/18/2019 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 117.94 WASTE CONTAINERS 488031 13C1-MFJQ-7G7C 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 419.98 GRAPHICS CARD 488461 13C1-MFJQ-7PYF 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 93.63 488423 14Y3-4HMK-9XXH 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 195.55 KEYPAD ENTRY 488027 196Y-TLJQ-4VCD 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.00 OSMO CAMERA BATTERY CORD 488469 1CTK-6RW9-V4MN 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 61.00 CORDS/CABLES 488460 1GFX-1W6V-4JRX 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 94.40 DISINFECTANT 488026 1KQY-JRQX-9PTF 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 35.99 COPIER PAPER 488029 1L31-FX9R-FCQC 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 4.00 COPIER PAPER 488029 1L31-FX9R-FCQC 5552.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 182.45 GATE VALVE 488533 1LHV-LLJV-MG1T 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 15.88 488028 1P1W-P6J9-J3W4 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434360 4/18/2019 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 38.99 AIR COMPRESSOR 488547 1P9V-T49R-K6FG 5761.6556 TOOLS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 129.95 PUBLIC WORKS COMPUTER STAND 488030 1TK1-41YD-H6V4 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 597.75 PC REPLACEMENT 488472 1YWQ-PMMM-TWFN 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,012.51 434361 4/18/2019 103957 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. 44.06 CAN CADDY 488032 INV-NET-LK-5932 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.06 434362 4/18/2019 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 215.97 LAUNDRY 488033 1004437760 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 160.76 LAUNDRY 488034 1004439815 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 171.80 LAUNDRY 488424 1004444187 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 548.53 434363 4/18/2019 135278 ANNMADE INC. 76.80 GIFT SHOP SALES 488035 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 76.80 434364 4/18/2019 144694 ANTHONY OLSON 35.86 UTILITY REFUND 488380 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 35.86 434365 4/18/2019 144683 APRIL DESKIN 25.00 273AR-18-4414 488364 04-08-2019 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 273AR-18-4825 488365 04-08-2019.01 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 434366 4/18/2019 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,572.50 488181 3334743 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,757.60 488185 3337487, 3337490 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 889.00 488182 3337488 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,160.00 488183 3337489 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,306.60 488184 3337491 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,685.70 434367 4/18/2019 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 6.86 FILTERS 488036 038084367 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 139.94 FILTERS 488039 038084798 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434367 4/18/2019 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS Continued... 8.92 SPARK PLUGS 488038 038084834 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.69 SPARK PLUGS 488037 038084933 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.61 FILTERS 488432 038085220 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.07 FILTER 488456 038085300 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.51 FILTER 488430 038085432 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.82 FILTERS 488427 038085437 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.36 FILTERS 488440 038085575 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 245.78 434368 4/18/2019 112862 AXELSON, MARY 3.60 GIFT SHOP SALES 488040 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.60 434369 4/18/2019 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 192.13 488041 P13351621 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 192.13 434370 4/18/2019 142186 BAYCOM 3,944.00 RUGGED TABLET FOR UTILITIES 488042 EQUIPINV_019614 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,944.00 434371 4/18/2019 143371 BEDO, FRANK 175.76 UTILITY REFUND 488381 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 175.76 434372 4/18/2019 129549 BEHLEN, NATE 41.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 488355 4112019C 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 41.76 434373 4/18/2019 144691 BEN BREIT 59.86 UTILITY REFUND 488377 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 59.86 434374 4/18/2019 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 409.80 GIFT SHOP SALES 488043 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 409.80 434375 4/18/2019 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 312.00 PIZZA 488044 4812164 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 312.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434375 4/18/2019 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.Continued... 434376 4/18/2019 125139 BERNICK'S 1,724.80 488193 492150 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 309.28 488192 493976 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 718.22 488326 493977 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,013.34 488194 493978 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,765.64 434377 4/18/2019 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 419.88 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488463 649901 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 419.88 434378 4/18/2019 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 144.00 488195 4112 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 488344 4113 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 488196 4114 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 432.00 434379 4/18/2019 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 7.38 488516 229575 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 7.38 434380 4/18/2019 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 5.59 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 488045 83165529 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.99 488047 83169200 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 2,118.40 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 488046 83169 201 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,341.12 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 488197 83170797 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,549.10 434381 4/18/2019 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 7.00 488545 119351 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 332.00 488545 119351 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.25 488198 159724 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 400.00 488198 159724 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.00 488199 159759 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 456.00 488199 159759 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28.00 488345 159797 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,738.40 488345 159797 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,973.65 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434382 4/18/2019 144695 BRANDON SPURTH Continued... 14.19 UTILITY REFUND 488382 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 14.19 434383 4/18/2019 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 16.10 488201 1080951110 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,566.31 488201 1080951110 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.75 488200 1080951111 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,359.93 488200 1080951111 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 35.65 488205 108095439 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,883.03 488205 108095439 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.39 488206 1080954537 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,975.03 488206 1080954537 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 488204 1080954538 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 30.00 488204 1080954538 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.84 488203 1080954541 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,377.51 488203 1080954541 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.60 488202 1080954542 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,150.14 488202 1080954542 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 33.64 488327 1080954543 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,705.98 488327 1080954543 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 488330 1080954594 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 37.50 488330 1080954594 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.61 488328 1080954595 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,420.67 488328 1080954595 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.75 488329 1080954596 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 292.50 488329 1080954596 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17,994.23 434384 4/18/2019 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 5,270.35 488207 1090986046 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 488208 1090986047 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,069.20 488209 1090989088 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,571.75 488543 1090991824 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 488546 1090991825 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,070.30 434385 4/18/2019 101752 BRISCOE, ROBERT 45.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488048 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434386 4/18/2019 137691 BY THE YARD INC.Continued... 8,294.56 MULTI-USE FURNITURE 488050 118829 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 8,294.56 434387 4/18/2019 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 203.00 MERCHANDISE 488052 930217307 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 222.30 MERCHANDISE 488053 930217308 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 222.30 MERCHANDISE 488054 930217389 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 525.60 MERCHANDISE 488055 930224569 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 185.18-RETURNED PRODUCT 488051 930231255 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 988.02 434388 4/18/2019 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,539.80 488210 2244344 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.00 488212 2247519 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,422.85 488211 2247520 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 135.51-488535 2250485 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 56.10 488537 2250493 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,599.60 488536 2250496 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 704.55 488538 2250497 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 255.00-488534 2250786 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,946.39 434389 4/18/2019 144703 CARMEN NIELSEN 30.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488402 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 30.00 434390 4/18/2019 123898 CENTURYLINK 48.48 488523 0146-3/19 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 58.14 488523 0146-3/19 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 58.29 488523 0146-3/19 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 58.29 488523 0146-3/19 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 61.51 488523 0146-3/19 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 61.51 488523 0146-3/19 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 61.51 488523 0146-3/19 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 66.89 488523 0146-3/19 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 61.51 488523 0146-3/19 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 67.96 488523 0146-3/19 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 61.51 488523 0146-3/19 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 39.75 488523 0146-3/19 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 705.35 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434390 4/18/2019 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 434391 4/18/2019 144690 CHRISTOPHER KRUG 140.49 UTILITY REFUND 488376 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 140.49 434392 4/18/2019 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 44.21 LINENS 488056 4019107605 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 33.34 LINENS 488058 4019533051 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 44.21 LINENS 488057 4019533060 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 20.00 SHOP TOWELS 488059 4019615932 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 13.07 RENTAL UNIFORM 488413 4019671138 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.19 LAUNDRY 488467 4019671157 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.80 RENTAL UNIFORM 488414 4019671159 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 38.88 RENTAL UNIFORM 488415 4019671186 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 60.41 RENTAL UNIFORM 488412 4019671265 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326.11 434393 4/18/2019 126726 COBRA PUMA GOLF INC. 1,050.23 MERCHANDISE 488153 G1645625 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,050.23 434394 4/18/2019 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 602.84 488154 3638208455 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 602.84 434395 4/18/2019 120433 COMCAST 124.81 CABLE 488155 8772 10 614 0177449-3/19 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 124.81 434396 4/18/2019 136899 CORRIGAN, KAT 6.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488156 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.00 434397 4/18/2019 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 4.80 GIFT SHOP SALES 488158 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.80 434398 4/18/2019 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 1,152.07 STAFF UNIFORM 488159 94607018 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434398 4/18/2019 102514 CUTTER & BUCK Continued... 1,152.07 434399 4/18/2019 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,660.00 QUARTERLY SERVICE APRIL-JUNE 488160 3217624 5710.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,660.00 434400 4/18/2019 142919 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES 57,236.58 488529 00000535688 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57,236.58 434401 4/18/2019 143148 DEVORAK, COREY 16.80 GIFT SHOP SALES 488161 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.80 434402 4/18/2019 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 2,305.25 488522 DT0002537181 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,305.25 434403 4/18/2019 124358 DILL, SARAH 235.90 SCULPTING WITH ARMATURE REFUND 488404 4.12.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 235.90 434404 4/18/2019 139768 DOUVILLE, CELESTE 1.80 GIFT SHOP MARCH 2019 488163 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.80 434405 4/18/2019 143332 DOWLING, CAITLIN 36.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488164 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.00 434406 4/18/2019 129079 DRAIN KING INC. 1,330.00 GRANG ECAHILL FROZEN WASTE 488162 WO-6577 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,330.00 434407 4/18/2019 141359 EARL, NICK 67.80 EAC GIFT SHOP SALES 488373 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 67.80 434408 4/18/2019 103594 EDINALARM INC. 200.00 CLUBHOUSE ALARM 488140 40773 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434408 4/18/2019 103594 EDINALARM INC.Continued... 200.00 434409 4/18/2019 137586 EGAN, WENDY 86.40 GIFT SHOP SALES 488141 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 86.40 434410 4/18/2019 144681 ELIZABETH A. RUSTAD 1,789.33 AMBULANCE REFUND 488528 04-08-2019 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,789.33 434411 4/18/2019 144255 ELLEL JEWELRY 18.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488374 4.11.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 18.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488386 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.00 434412 4/18/2019 144687 ERIN BUSS 260.00 REFUND PLAYGROUND PROS 488369 040919 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 260.00 434413 4/18/2019 144682 ESTATE OF JOHN A NUGENT 76.87 273-18-5146 488363 04-08-2019 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.87 434414 4/18/2019 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 33.85-CREDIT MEMO 488454 1-5909563 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.10 GLOVES 488429 1-5917756 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.12 CONNECTORS 488439 1-5917986 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.47 CONNECTORS 488438 1-5919447 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.34-CREDIT MEMO 488143 69-346209 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.48-CREDIT MEMO 488142 69-346210 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.99 WHEEL NUT 488144 69-346589 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.78 WIPERS 488453 69-346916 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.90 GLOVES 488428 69-347015 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.69 434415 4/18/2019 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 12.24 FASTENERS 488145 MNTC2157115 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.02 NUTS/BOLTS 488447 MNTC2157178 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 15.26 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434416 4/18/2019 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 914.10 2" METER 488147 0318486 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 470.66 CS PARTS 488146 0320186 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,384.76 434417 4/18/2019 136205 FREEMAN, BRANDON 143.67 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 488356 4112019D 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 143.67 434418 4/18/2019 101103 GRAINGER 812.42 LIGHTS FOR THEATER 488152 9123419773 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 65.66 WATER HARDINESS KIT 488150 9129019973 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 195.22 2 GAS CANS FOR MIX FUEL 488151 9133671447 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 74.82 HEAT/COOL LOOP FILTERS 488148 9139392618 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 109.32 BREDESEN THERMOSTAT 488471 9140968653 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 393.65 PAPER PLATES, PLASTIC UTENSILS 488149 9141350323 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 103.36 SAFETY GLASSES 488416 9142377093 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,754.45 434419 4/18/2019 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 10.80 GIFT SHOP SALE 488123 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.20 GIFT SHOP SALES (POTTERY)488408 4.12.19.01 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 24.00 434420 4/18/2019 137695 GREENWOOD DESIGN BUILD 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 488410 166430 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 434421 4/18/2019 129248 GROTH SEWER & WATER 1,000.00 SL REPAIR 6313 CONCORD AVE 488452 6368 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,000.00 434422 4/18/2019 144240 GUNELSON, ERIN 75.00 FEATURED GIFT SHOP ARTIST 488389 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 75.00 434424 4/18/2019 103725 HAMER, STEVE 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 488361 4152019 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 434425 4/18/2019 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434425 4/18/2019 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN Continued... 67.20 MILEAGE, PARKING 488360 4112019H 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 67.20 434426 4/18/2019 126304 HAPCO 2,780.00 PARKLAWN/76TH POLES 488124 IN0000025114 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,780.00 434427 4/18/2019 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,423.96 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS 488125 4475294 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,423.96 434428 4/18/2019 136915 HELGESON, BRAD 1,050.00 CABLE BOX REPAIR 488126 04092019 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,050.00 434429 4/18/2019 141418 HILL, STEVEN 48.00 ART CENTER GIFT SHOP SALE 488390 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.00 434430 4/18/2019 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,398.50 488217 130189 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,083.00 488218 131645 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 942.00 488544 133055 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,615.00 488539 133056 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,038.50 434431 4/18/2019 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 13.17 GIFT SHOP SALES 488127 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.17 434432 4/18/2019 100031 I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 20,998.80 !-494 CORRIDOR COMM DUES 488166 031919 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 20,998.80 434433 4/18/2019 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 316.80 488331 75862 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.30-488220 75863 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 400.80 488219 75864 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 110.70 488221 75865 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 110.70 488332 75867 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434433 4/18/2019 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY Continued... 915.70 434434 4/18/2019 144686 JERI DENTZ 130.00 REFUND PLAYGROUND PROS 488368 040919 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 130.00 434435 4/18/2019 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 18.19 SUPPLIES FOR BREAKROOM 488132 3/19-GOLF 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 39.96 CHAINSAW BLADE SHARPENING 488132 3/19-GOLF 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 58.15 434436 4/18/2019 144701 JILL FRANKE 142.80 NCECA19 GALLERY SALES 488393 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 142.80 434437 4/18/2019 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,220.00 488333 13192 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,579.05 488225 2951517 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 68.55 488224 2951522 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 656.55 488227 2951558 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 78.45 488223 2951559 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 611.30 488228 2951560 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 78.45 488226 2951562 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,292.35 434438 4/18/2019 144685 JOE GOLDSHLACK 150.00 REFUND APP FEE 488411 169628 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 150.00 434439 4/18/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2.38 488540 01256898 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 219.38 488540 01256898 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 488297 1262185 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 400.00 488297 1262185 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488230 1262186 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 96.50 488230 1262186 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 488234 1262187 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 936.98 488234 1262187 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 488229 1262188 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 583.69 488229 1262188 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434439 4/18/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 1.19 488232 1262189 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 84.00 488232 1262189 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 30.94 488231 1262190 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,600.00 488231 1262190 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.77 488233 1262191 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 451.54 488233 1262191 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488313 1262192 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 24.00 488313 1262192 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 488300 1262193 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 560.00 488300 1262193 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 488322 1262194 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,120.00 488322 1262194 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 488312 1262195 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,009.16 488312 1262195 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .20 488314 1262196 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 19.04 488305 1262197 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 862.43 488305 1262197 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 488299 1262198 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 74.00 488299 1262198 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 53.55 488301 1262199 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,083.88 488301 1262199 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.42 488304 1262200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,279.13 488304 1262200 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.69 488303 1262201 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,675.00 488303 1262201 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488325 1262202 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.04 488306 1262203 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 725.32 488306 1262203 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 488298 1262204 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 540.56 488298 1262204 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.64 488302 1262205 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,915.66 488302 1262205 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 488320 1262209 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,040.48 488320 1262209 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76 488321 1262210 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 148.00 488321 1262210 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 488319 1262211 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,554.49 488319 1262211 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.20 488324 1262212 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 15Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434439 4/18/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 1,451.61 488324 1262212 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17.85 488318 1262213 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,269.60 488318 1262213 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.79 488323 1262214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,513.33 488323 1262214 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488316 1262215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 96.00 488316 1262215 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488315 1262216 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 48.00 488315 1262216 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.79 488317 1262217 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,746.42 488317 1262217 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28,468.28 434440 4/18/2019 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 488353 4112019A 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 434441 4/18/2019 136126 KADERLIK, NATE 120.92 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 488359 4112019G 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 120.92 434442 4/18/2019 143951 KANE, KIM 15.95 488133 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.95 434443 4/18/2019 139688 KEEPSAKE CIDERY LLP 120.00 488336 5041019 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 120.00 434444 4/18/2019 135227 LANO EQUIPMENT-LORETTO 85.92 DUST CAP, NUT 487877 01-665665 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,203.96 BOOM, BOOM FRAME 488134 01-665676 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.33-CREDIT MEMO 487735 01-666008 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.14-CREDIT MEMO 487880 01-666267 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,046.41 434445 4/18/2019 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 20,790.20 MARCH ATTORNEY FEES 488135 03312019 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,790.20 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 16Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434446 4/18/2019 144700 LINDA CHRISTIANSON Continued... 90.00 NCECA19 GALLERY SALE 488392 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 90.00 434447 4/18/2019 144699 LINDA MORSE 99.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488391 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 99.00 434448 4/18/2019 130020 MCCD 6,250.00 OPEN TO BUSINESS PROGRAM 488109 ED-9 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER HRA ADMINISTRATION 6,250.00 434449 4/18/2019 103790 MCKEACHIE JOHNSTON, JAN 388.80 NCECA19 GALLERY SALES 488394 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 388.80 434450 4/18/2019 122510 MERCHANTS OF GOLF 555.75 PUTTERS 488115 101381 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 555.75 434451 4/18/2019 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 715.54 LAMP ASY 488435 513279 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 129.15 CONTROLLER 488437 513326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 844.69 434452 4/18/2019 139486 MID-AMERICA SPORTS CONSTRUCTION 126,788.60 MID-AMERICA PAYMENT APP #13 488421 03222019 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 126,788.60 434453 4/18/2019 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 9,802.20 488521 431-0005 300-4/19 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 9,802.20 434454 4/18/2019 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 1,189.01 MOWER PARTS 488116 P86291 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 1,189.01 434455 4/18/2019 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 571.00 OPEN TO BUSINESS FLYERS 488117 27179 9210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HRA ADMINISTRATION 571.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 17Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434455 4/18/2019 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 434456 4/18/2019 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 261.50 488308 4173 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 254.75 488307 E-4172 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 523.00 488309 E-4176 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,039.25 434457 4/18/2019 141356 MONAHAN, BRETT 31.20 GIFT SHOP SALES 488401 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 434458 4/18/2019 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 35.00 SHARPEN ZAM BLADES 488464 872 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 35.00 434459 4/18/2019 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 12.00 488311 141911 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 792.00 488311 141911 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.00 488282 141914 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 952.00 488282 141914 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.00 488310 141919 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 512.00 488310 141919 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,294.00 434460 4/18/2019 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 3,287.44 ROAD SIGN MATERIAL 488441 TRFINV010716 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 3,287.44 434461 4/18/2019 104350 NIKE USA INC. 362.21 MERCHANDISE 488098 9931981192 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 65.21 MERCHANDISE 488099 9932105167 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 257.93 MERCHANDISE 488100 9932215737 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 685.35 434462 4/18/2019 142201 NORTHWEST LIGHTING SYSTEMS CO. 137.00 MAIN BLDG LIGHTING 488101 111578 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 316.00 EXIT LIGHTING 488102 111579 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.00 LIGHTING 488103 111620 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 474.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 18Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434463 4/18/2019 139023 NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT Continued... 103.99 FILTERS 488455 7133234P 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.99 434464 4/18/2019 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 12.15 LANGUAGE LINE-BOOKING 488104 W18110652 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.15 434465 4/18/2019 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE, INC. 245.00 ST. 1 HOIST INSP. & REPAIR 488105 634281 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 245.00 434466 4/18/2019 143531 OLSON, HILLARY 216.00 PORTRAIT MODEL 488372 4.11.19 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 216.00 434467 4/18/2019 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 6,530.00 5828 EWING UTILITY UPGRADES 488530 5174 01451.1705.17 UTILITY COORDINATION Chowen A/B 6,530.00 434468 4/18/2019 129470 PALMER PRINTING 1,272.00 SCORECARDS 488106 190803-01 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1,272.00 434469 4/18/2019 102440 PASS, GRACE 95.40 GIFT SHOP SALES 488078 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 95.40 434470 4/18/2019 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 7.00 488283 46118 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 428.70 488283 46118 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.75 488285 46850 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,525.70 488285 46850 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.25 488334 46860 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,962.40 488334 46860 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.25 488335 46861 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 87.00 488335 46861 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.00 488284 46867 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,586.70 488284 46867 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,658.75 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 19Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434471 4/18/2019 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Continued... 171.22 PEPSI 488079 27282655 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 619.03 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488466 33637651 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 94.03 488286 78155963 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 884.28 434472 4/18/2019 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 90.35 SALT - ST. 1 488425 167137 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 90.35 434473 4/18/2019 140127 PETERSON, NATE 58.46 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 488358 4112019F 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 58.46 434474 4/18/2019 135849 PETSMART #2412 155.74 EDINA PD PO# 3015 488080 T-1964 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 151.96 EDINA POLICE PO# 3031 488081 T-5636 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 307.70 434475 4/18/2019 103512 PETTY CASH 11.00 REGISTRATION FEES 488082 04112019 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.44 SUPPLIES 488082 04112019 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.00 PARKING 488082 04112019 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.31 STAFF MEETINGS 488082 04112019 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 395.28 MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS 488082 04112019 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 487.03 434476 4/18/2019 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 39.26 488289 2534646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,362.19 488289 2534646 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.90 488288 2534647 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 895.10 488288 2534647 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 488290 2534648 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 186.00 488290 2534648 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 57.12 488293 2534649 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,428.47 488293 2534649 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 488291 2534650 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 434.50 488291 2534650 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 488292 2534651 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 488541 2534652 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 117.60 488541 2534652 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 20Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434476 4/18/2019 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 8.33 488287 25346531 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 689.69 488287 25346531 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.12 488542 2534654 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 563.52 488542 2534654 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 156.00-488339 326125 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-488339 326125 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 156.00-488338 326126 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-488338 326126 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 156.00-488337 326127 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-488337 326127 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,366.32 434477 4/18/2019 100119 PING 436.33 MERCHANDISE 488083 14648479 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 436.33 434478 4/18/2019 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 224.00 MILEAGE 488357 4112019E 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 224.00 434479 4/18/2019 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 33.53 WEST PAINT 488418 985102054684 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 33.53 434480 4/18/2019 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 95.89 WATER 488084 622833-03-19 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 95.89 434481 4/18/2019 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 360.00 488294 5414 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 360.00 488295 5415 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 625.00 488340 I-5416 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,345.00 434482 4/18/2019 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 1,214.91 PUMP REPAIR 488088 M101541-1 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,214.91 434483 4/18/2019 144702 RACHEL VITKO 231.60 GIFT SHOP SALES 488399 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 21Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434483 4/18/2019 144702 RACHEL VITKO Continued... 231.60 434484 4/18/2019 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 3,765.98 RANGE BALL WASHER 488089 92477 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 3,765.98 434485 4/18/2019 140950 RCM EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC 591.25 488090 6935 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 591.25 434486 4/18/2019 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 6,088.00 OUTDOOR WARNING SIGNAL REPAIR 488091 102367 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 6,088.00 434487 4/18/2019 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 144.00 488092 K-51692087 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 434488 4/18/2019 141687 REIHER, PAT 21.00 GIFT SHOP SALE 488395 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.00 434489 4/18/2019 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 40,461.48 488519 0894-004870096 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 40,461.48 434490 4/18/2019 144693 RICHARD DEICK 120.00 UTILITY REFUND 488379 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 120.00 434491 4/18/2019 117408 RJ MARCO CONSTRUCTION INC. 1,756.00 CITY HALL BLIND REPAIR 488165 49039 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,756.00 434492 4/18/2019 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 114.90 488296 18487|5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 114.90 434493 4/18/2019 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 204.32 UQT3 DEC. PLANNING MTG 488384 2019.4.12 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 22Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434493 4/18/2019 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT Continued... 204.32 434494 4/18/2019 144704 RONALD BELTER 22.00 REFUND-SMART DRIVING CLASS 488406 04152019 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 434495 4/18/2019 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 2.25 488343 19-11724 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 160.02 488343 19-11724 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.50 488267 19-11808 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 180.00 488267 19-11808 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 343.77 434496 4/18/2019 144689 ROTO ROOTER 204.84 PERMIT REFUND 80% OF BASE FEE 488444 04112019 1495.4114 HEATING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 204.84 434497 4/18/2019 142340 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD 6,316.20 PARK SIGNS 488066 200907 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 6,316.20 434498 4/18/2019 139439 RUE 38 LLC 336.00 488067 5325 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 336.00 434499 4/18/2019 144697 RUTH TALEN ERICKSON 15.60 GIFT SHOP SALES 488387 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 434500 4/18/2019 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 21.60 GIFT SHOP SALE 488068 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.60 434501 4/18/2019 144059 SCHERER BROS 323.50 PERMIT FEE REFUND 488409 ED169620 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 323.50 434502 4/18/2019 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 1,691.20 RAMP ELEVATOR 488069 7152903921 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,691.20 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 23Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434502 4/18/2019 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.Continued... 434503 4/18/2019 140798 SCHULTZ, ERIN 20.00 REFUND PLAYGROUND AND GOLF 488385 041219 1600.4390.70 YOUTH PROGRAMS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 120.00 REFUND PLAYGROUND AND GOLF 488385 041219 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 140.00 434504 4/18/2019 100995 SEH 9,285.22 TH 62 WM REHAB 488268 365599 05582.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Indian Trails B/C 1,582.17 VERNON/INTERLACHEN INT IMPS 488474 366395 05578.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Vernon Interlachen WM 1,582.17 VERNON/INTERLACHEN INT IMPS 488474 366395 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,339.84 488475 366398 07154.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN City Hall Speed Bump Project 13,789.40 434505 4/18/2019 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 158.40 NCECA19 FEATURE ARTIST SALES 488396 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 158.40 434506 4/18/2019 144696 SHELLY ELLIOTT 25.00 REFUND-SMART DRIVING CLASS 488383 04122019 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 25.00 434507 4/18/2019 144242 SHOOT, SARAH 98.40 GIFT SHOP SALES 488397 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 98.40 434508 4/18/2019 101556 SHRED-IT USA 83.52 SHREDDING 488167 8126934483 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.52 434509 4/18/2019 120784 SIGN PRO 3,671.81 BDAY PLATEAU SIGNAGE 488070 13899 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 939.67 BETTER TOGETHER SIGNS 488168 13966 1120.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION 4,611.48 434510 4/18/2019 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 517.45 LOGO CLOTHING 488417 978124 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 517.45 434511 4/18/2019 140828 SISK, MINDY 250.80 GIFT SHOP SALES 488071 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 24Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434511 4/18/2019 140828 SISK, MINDY Continued... 250.80 434512 4/18/2019 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 183.36 SCREWDRIVER SET 488431 ARV/39545907 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.36 434513 4/18/2019 105739 SNAZA, DAVID 279.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 488354 4112019B 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 279.50 434515 4/18/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3.20 488270 1803211 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 320.00 488270 1803211 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.60 488271 1803212 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,283.00 488271 1803212 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 488272 1803213 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.00 488272 1803213 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.00 488274 1803214 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 685.90 488274 1803214 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.40 488276 1804607 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9.77 488277 1805836 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,501.16 488277 1805836 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 488281 1805837 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.00 488281 1805837 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.80 488252 1805838 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 950.01 488252 1805838 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 488279 1805839 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,270.00 488279 1805839 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.40 488280 1805840 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 476.00 488280 1805840 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.84 488341 1805842 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 850.35 488341 1805842 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 43.20 488346 1805843 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,781.71 488346 1805843 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 488348 1805844 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 430.00 488348 1805844 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .88 488342 1805845 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 171.20 488342 1805845 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.00 488254 1805846 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,800.00 488254 1805846 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 25Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434515 4/18/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 11.60 488253 1805847 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,371.20 488253 1805847 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 488256 1805848 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,218.00 488256 1805848 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .53 488257 1807190 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 557.20 488257 1807190 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 488273 5040169 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 180.01 488273 5040169 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.40 488278 5040559 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,520.00 488278 5040559 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.40 488347 5040560 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,440.00 488347 5040560 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 488255 5040561 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,360.00 488255 5040561 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.00 488269 5040562 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,259.00 488269 5040562 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.80 488275 5040563 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,076.40 488275 5040563 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27,876.56 434516 4/18/2019 110977 SOW, ADAMA 32.40 GIFT SHOP SALES 488072 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.40 434517 4/18/2019 134700 SPOK INC. 189.80 PAGERS 488468 C0319246P 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 189.80 434518 4/18/2019 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1,090.90 GEOFENCING FEB & MARCH 488073 100295934-03152 019 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,090.90 434519 4/18/2019 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1,545.45 488258 100297426-02152 019 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,545.45 434520 4/18/2019 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 330.00 488260 26993 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 26Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434520 4/18/2019 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 360.00 488349 26994 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.00 488259 26995 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 771.00 434521 4/18/2019 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 171.76 BLUETOOTH HANDS-FREE BOB 488407 041519 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 171.76 434522 4/18/2019 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 183.00 MOVIE RENTAL E.P.488459 RG 2642368 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 183.00 434523 4/18/2019 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 57.31 CREDIT APPLIED TO INVOICE 488074 247316276 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 459.26 COGS 488074 247316276 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 516.57 434524 4/18/2019 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN 349.95 UNIFORM PANTS 488352 040819BT 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 349.95 434525 4/18/2019 137041 TEEGARDEN, KATHY 39.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488075 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 434527 4/18/2019 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 693.67 INVESTIGATIONS 488458 840061357 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 693.67 434528 4/18/2019 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 2,000.00 488261 2019-212413 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,000.00 434529 4/18/2019 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 2,554.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 488262 PM3518 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,554.00 434530 4/18/2019 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 5.00 488263 18371 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 367.00 488263 18371 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 27Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434530 4/18/2019 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC Continued... 372.00 434531 4/18/2019 144238 TRELLES, JEANNIE 74.40 GIFT SHOP SALES 488398 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.40 434532 4/18/2019 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 453.75 GRASS SEED 488532 44034 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 639.03 GRASS SEED 488531 44035 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,092.78 434533 4/18/2019 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 694.53 LOCATING FLAGS 488076 861920 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 694.53 434534 4/18/2019 103590 VALLEY-RICH CO. INC. 1,164.00 GV REPLACEMENT 488476 26823 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,164.00 434535 4/18/2019 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 632.05 CAN LINERS 488264 496842-00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 632.05 434536 4/18/2019 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 488526 9827265704 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 56.80 488526 9827265704 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 70.02 488526 9827265704 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 70.02 488526 9827265704 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 75.02 488526 9827265704 1100.6160 DATA PROCESSING CITY COUNCIL 105.03 488526 9827265704 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 140.04 488526 9827265704 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 140.04 488526 9827265704 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 148.04 488526 9827265704 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 245.07 488526 9827265704 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 455.13 488526 9827265704 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 1,155.37 488526 9827265704 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,225.35 488526 9827265704 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.02 488526 9827265704 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.01 488526 9827265704 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 70.02 488526 9827265704 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 28Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434536 4/18/2019 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued... 70.02 488526 9827265704 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 70.02 488526 9827265704 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 875.25 488526 9827265704 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 44.90-488527 9827322086 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 50.89 488527 9827322086 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.89 488527 9827322086 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 82.31 488527 9827322086 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 1,030.13 488527 9827322086 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 223.33 488527 9827322086 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 92.31 488527 9827322086 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 6,596.24 434537 4/18/2019 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 100.18-RETURN LIGHTING 488077 14355040419 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 397.38 TVSS 488448 S002457358.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,209.91 UG WIRE FOR STREET LIGHTS 488060 S002470053.001 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 93.76-RETURN LIGHTING 488470 S002470127.001 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,413.35 434538 4/18/2019 144654 VINEYARD VINES LLC 106.04 MERCHANDISE 488170 981290 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,271.62 MERCHANDISE 488169 981358 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 96.04 MERCHANDISE 488265 987231 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,473.70 434539 4/18/2019 144684 VIRGINA FETZER 89.25 273AR-18-4471A 488367 04-08-2019 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 89.25 434540 4/18/2019 129083 W S & D PERMIT SERVICE 201.84 REFUND 80% PERMIT FEE 488362 169427 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 201.84 434541 4/18/2019 139298 WARFIELD, SUSAN 174.60 4063/4163 PRERNA REFUND 488405 4.12.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 174.60 434542 4/18/2019 122059 WASHINGTON COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,379.27 911 DATA CENTER FIBER LEASE 488240 149436 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,379.27 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 29Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434542 4/18/2019 122059 WASHINGTON COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVICES Continued... 434543 4/18/2019 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 1,522.98 GAS AND DIESEL 488061 70719 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,522.98 434544 4/18/2019 144243 WHISLER, KATE 102.00 GIFT SHOP SALES 488400 4.12.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 102.00 434545 4/18/2019 144463 WILLIAMS, JON D 350.00 273AR-18-4648 488366 04-08-2019 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 350.00 434546 4/18/2019 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1.19 488243 7229750 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 116.00 488243 7229750 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.28 488245 7229751 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,226.00 488245 7229751 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.12 488244 7229752 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,896.00 488244 7229752 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,285.59 434547 4/18/2019 144412 WINEBOW 1.75 488248 56824 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 246.00 488248 56824 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.75 488249 6083634 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 90.00 488249 6083634 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 228.00 488247 MN00056571 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00-488246 MN00056572 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.50-488246 MN00056572 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 228.00 488351 MN00056793 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 662.00 434548 4/18/2019 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 27.35 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 488172 175075 01 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 39.85 MAIN BLDG LIGHTING 488062 175356 01 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 20.49 SCREWS\488449 175607 01 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 87.69 434549 4/18/2019 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 30Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434549 4/18/2019 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY Continued... 87.00 488250 1557 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 96.00 488235 1558 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 180.00 488251 1559 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 363.00 434550 4/18/2019 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,525.66 488524 632232963 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 19,043.71 ELCTRICAL SERVICE 488420 632233506 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,785.61 ELCTRICAL SERVICE 488420 632233506 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 28,636.51 488525 632243321 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 200.60 488520 632247988 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9,725.77 488517 632968490 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,229.61 488518 632974808 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 3,690.68 2019 CIP ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 488063 633084750 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 73,838.15 434551 4/18/2019 131433 Z SYSTEMS 12,879.96 REPLACEMENT CHAMBERS CAMERAS 488012 45599 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 579.36 CHAMBERS CAMERA & MIC INSTALL 488064 45682 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 13,459.32 434552 4/18/2019 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 550.00 BROOM 488236 0174543 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 550.00 434553 4/18/2019 101531 ZINN, JUDY 50.40 JEWELRY SUPPLY REIMBURSMENT 488371 4.11.19 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50.40 434554 4/18/2019 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 32,896.96 ZOLL CARDIAC MONITOR 488065 2844076 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 32,896.96 434555 4/25/2019 144104 BEST APPROACH PUBLICATIONS 2,778.26 YARDAGE BOOK 488621 41908Y-B 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,778.26 434556 4/25/2019 100609 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 2,910.00 488602 2511 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 2,910.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 31Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434556 4/25/2019 100609 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION Continued... 434557 4/25/2019 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 115.00 AARP SMART DRIVING 488815 04132019 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 115.00 434558 4/25/2019 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 114.00 488935 140086 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 174.00 488619 9363 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 489013 9429 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 375.00 434559 4/25/2019 129458 ACME TOOLS 374.10 PRUNER, SPRAYER 488788 6537655 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 610.00 488651 6539165 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 984.10 434560 4/25/2019 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 1,773.99 MERCHANDISE 488665 907068891 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 122.00 MERCHANDISE 488670 907243602 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 122.00 MERCHANDISE 488669 907250623 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 113.32 MERCHANDISE 488917 907264261 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 77.85 MERCHANDISE 488918 907264549 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 164.60 MERCHANDISE 488919 907273795 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 475.27 MERCHANDISE 488920 907281819 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,849.03 434561 4/25/2019 144707 ADDCO ACQUISITION LLC 685.52 DIGITAL MESSAGE BOARD REPAIR 489168 INV5947 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 685.52 434562 4/25/2019 143557 ADIDAS AMERICA INC. 1,392.00 MERCHANDISE 488664 6177017370-001 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 144.00 MERCHANDISE 488923 6177551648 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,536.00 434563 4/25/2019 135346 ADVANCED FILING CONCEPTS 305.28 488695 130082 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 305.28 434564 4/25/2019 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 32Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434564 4/25/2019 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS Continued... 204.00 ALERUS MARCH ADMIN FEES 488674 C78271 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 204.00 434565 4/25/2019 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 424.10 CABLE TIES 488716 1146-4V4R-7MF9 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 301.83 PRINTER BOX FOR MOTOR2 488998 11KC-3YCY-P6JT 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,199.98 COMPUTER MONITORS 488683 16NV-4X9Q-NYCT 4629.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Police Forensic Equipment 119.96 DRIVES FOR 16000717 488682 19RD-HTL3-YMNF 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 187.69 AUTO LEAD TEST KIT 488816 1FJ4-6PGM-9THG 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 809.97 DRIVE REPLACE 488826 1GTV-PQNY-MK6W 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 226.32 IT SUPPLIES 489026 1JCX-6FXJ-4XRM 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 113.38 BUNNY BREAKFAST 488779 1NFT-H34X-PXLL 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 14.83 POPCORN CAMBRO 488590 1P1W-P6J9-XYFF 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 144.48 PRINTER CARTRIDGES 488983 1QYV-L7PT-R3KH 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 105.04 LABELS FOR NEWSLETTER MAILINGS 489166 1R7W-GM13-47TQ 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 79.00 TRASH RECEPTACLES 489167 1V9Q-D146-9CWQ 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 3,726.58 434566 4/25/2019 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 152.69 488600 1004442086 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 242.27 489027 1004448413 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 215.97 LAUNDRY 489024 1004450590 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 610.93 434567 4/25/2019 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 2,112.48 489047 10582163-00 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 304.84 PAPER 488906 10585112-00 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,417.32 434568 4/25/2019 144731 ANNETTE ELIZABETH 205.00 UTILITY REFUND 489062 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 205.00 434569 4/25/2019 141972 AP MIDWEST LLC 12,152.93 NORTH RAMP EXP - PAY APP #14 488943 NORTH PARKING RAMP EXT 9243.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50TH AND FRANCE 2 TIF DISTRICT 12,152.93 434570 4/25/2019 134924 ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. 1,665.50 MN-TF1 MEDICAL IO 488810 9501170811 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 33Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434570 4/25/2019 134924 ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.Continued... 1,665.50 434571 4/25/2019 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 509.00 488827 3338985 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 590.71 489019 3338986 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,149.10 488840 3338987 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.16-488927 455328 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,242.65 434572 4/25/2019 106304 ASPEN MILLS 110.00 UNIFORMS - HUGHES 488780 235117 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 306.55 UNIFORMS - JACOBS 488781 235118 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 460.15 UNIFORMS - WHITE 488782 235119 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 258.80 UNIFORMS 2019 - ARMSTRONG 489000 77651 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.55 UNIFORMS 2019 - BLANEK 489001 77652 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 72.95 UNIFORMS 2019 - KOCH 489005 77653 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 UNIFORMS 2019 - LAVENTURE 489006 77654 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 96.35 UNIFORMS 2019 - PETRELLA 489007 77655 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.85 UNIFORMS 2019 - SATTER 489008 77656 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.70 UNIFORMS 2019 - SEEGER 489009 77657 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 141.80 UNIFORMS 2019 - WAKEFIELD 489010 77658 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.70 UNIFORMS 2019 - FISHER 489011 77660 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 275.95 UNIFORMS 2019 - SORENSON 488992 77676 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,766.35 434573 4/25/2019 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 6.08 FILTER 488785 038074902 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.37 FILTERS 488786 038077296 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.10 FILTERS 488789 038085728 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.58 FILTERS 489135 038085912 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 77.87 OIL FILTERS 488811 038095602 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 315.00 434574 4/25/2019 142729 BEDO, RACHEL 60.00 REFUND MINI HAWKS & PLAYGROUND 489018 042319 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 268.00 REFUND MINI HAWKS & PLAYGROUND 489018 042319 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 328.00 434575 4/25/2019 125139 BERNICK'S 399.00 488614 495596 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 34Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434575 4/25/2019 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 332.00 488615 495597 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.00 488929 495598 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,692.44 488939 495599 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 80.00 488612 495600 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,066.80 488613 495601 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 124.50 488611 495602 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,714.74 434576 4/25/2019 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 502.43 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488857 651708 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 502.43 434577 4/25/2019 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 189.00 488743 4121 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 189.00 434578 4/25/2019 144748 BOB HURSH 316.00 BIRD HOUSES 488899 416 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 316.00 434579 4/25/2019 131967 BOLLIG & SONS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 488801 ED168000 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 488802 ED168829 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 434580 4/25/2019 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 239.60 488698 83175696 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 239.60 434581 4/25/2019 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 10.50 488616 159944 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 781.92 488616 159944 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.25 488928 159991 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 314.00 488928 159991 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.25 489112 160149 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 363.31 489112 160149 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,480.23 434582 4/25/2019 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 41.74 MUFFLER BRACKET 489133 19959D 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 35Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434582 4/25/2019 117040 BOYER TRUCKS Continued... 40.00 EXHAUST CLAMPS 489138 19991D 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.90 DIAPHRAM 488787 853120 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.64 434583 4/25/2019 144722 BRADLEY JOHNSON 372.00 UTILITY REFUND 489052 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 372.00 434584 4/25/2019 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 32.77 488744 1080958147 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,439.70 488744 1080958147 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 489105 1080958148 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 44.00 489105 1080958148 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.44 489103 1080958149 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 360.00 489103 1080958149 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.39 489104 1080958150 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,296.00 489104 1080958150 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 33.64 488745 1080958151 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,835.42 488745 1080958151 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.36 488746 1080958152 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,723.64 488746 1080958152 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 29.13 488721 1080958153 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,894.66 488721 1080958153 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.30 488932 1080958194 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 116.00 488932 1080958194 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.65 488930 1080958195 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 637.23 488930 1080958195 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.60 488933 1080958196 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,119.55 488933 1080958196 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.51 488931 1080958197 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 520.00 488931 1080958197 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.71 488834 1080959170 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,192.50 488834 1080959170 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.71 488940 1080959171 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,192.50 488940 1080959171 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.19 489174 1080960633 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 831.96 489174 1080960633 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 489176 1080960694 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 761.40 489176 1080960694 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.60 489175 1080960695 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 36Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434584 4/25/2019 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 352.00 489175 1080960695 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24,518.71 434585 4/25/2019 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 1,782.05 489097 1090989111 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,410.80 488723 1090991822 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 488722 1090991823 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,341.80 488936 1090991826 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 488934 1090991827 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,320.50 489002 1090994323 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,014.15 434586 4/25/2019 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 185.00 BRINDLE NLC CLASS REGISTRATION 488809 041819 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 185.00 434587 4/25/2019 144769 BROWN, JASON 89.00 REFUND SKYHAWKS FLAG LEAGUE 489032 042219 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 89.00 434588 4/25/2019 116408 BTR OF MINNESOTA 38.77 HEADLIGHT REAR COVER KIT 488790 32634 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.77 434589 4/25/2019 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 3,000.00 488877 6128260430-4/19 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,000.00 434590 4/25/2019 144771 BURKE, LAURA 122.00 REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 489034 042219 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 122.00 434591 4/25/2019 141596 BUSHLAND, TIFFANY 125.00 VV CHANGE FUND 489090 41519 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 125.00 434592 4/25/2019 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 28.00 MERCHANDISE 488668 930009403 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,206.00 GRAND OPENING BALLS 488656 930270682 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,234.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 37Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434592 4/25/2019 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF Continued... 434593 4/25/2019 102482 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY 332.67 OFF LEASH PARK COLLARS 488924 0361006-IN 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL 332.67 434594 4/25/2019 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 155.20 489119 114 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.35 489118 2242084 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,281.25 488725 2250491 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 255.00 488951 2251535 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 257.75 489012 2253538 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 69.90 488724 2550488 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,041.45 434595 4/25/2019 144675 CARLOS CREEK WINERY, INC. 312.00 489111 17145 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 378.00 489020 17146 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 690.00 434596 4/25/2019 129923 CAWLEY COMPANY, THE 13.71 HEIDI LEE NAME BADGE 488641 V62173O 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 27.43 VPA NAME TAGS 488641 V62173O 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 41.14 434597 4/25/2019 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 119.67 488894 596524-8030108 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.67 434598 4/25/2019 123898 CENTURYLINK 168.13 488893 2951-4/19 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.76 488891 6522-4/19 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 225.77 488888 6661-4/19 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 460.66 434599 4/25/2019 135835 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 1,242.00 488892 5142XLP683-4/19 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 1,242.00 434600 4/25/2019 100683 CHEMSEARCH 655.58 WATER TREATMENT SERVICE 488775 3498925 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 38Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434600 4/25/2019 100683 CHEMSEARCH Continued... 655.58 434601 4/25/2019 144749 CHRISTINE GEPP 25.00 REFUND 488796 041619 1100.4391 OTHER FEES CITY COUNCIL 25.00 434602 4/25/2019 130054 CIGNA HEALTHCARE 3,603.35 2019 P/F ADD RENEWAL 488678 ABL 962671 1 7 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 3,603.35 434603 4/25/2019 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 95.01 LINENS 488902 4016621235 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 44.21 MATS 488900 4019945660 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 173.74 LINENS 488901 4019945667 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 6.25 TOWEL SERVICE CINTAS 488909 4020033121 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 37.66 RUG LAUNDERING 488587 4020033164 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.15 UNIFORM RENTAL 488997 4020126366 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.04 UNIFORM RENTAL 488994 4020126377 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 58.41 UNIFORM RENTAL 488993 4020126380 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.91 UNIFORM RENTAL 488995 4020126385 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 10.29 UNIFORM RENTAL 488996 4020126414 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 571.67 434604 4/25/2019 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 57,426.00 488643 16854 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 57,426.00 434605 4/25/2019 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONES 488999 COM-1846 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 434606 4/25/2019 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 8,036.78 488654 IN34246 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8,036.78 434607 4/25/2019 126726 COBRA PUMA GOLF INC. 152.29 MERCHANDISE 487960 X367468 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET Supplier 103315 COBRA 152.29 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 39Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434608 4/25/2019 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Continued... 1,107.47 488604 M424-002073-5/1 9 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 1,107.47 434609 4/25/2019 120433 COMCAST 84.90 NORTH RAMP INTERNET 488691 0540232-4/19 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 84.90 434610 4/25/2019 120433 COMCAST 6.77 CABLE TV 488696 23973-4/19 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 6.77 434611 4/25/2019 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 194.98-489126 190415 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 194.98 489126 190415 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 194.98 489126 190415 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 194.98 434612 4/25/2019 144092 CONCENTRA 100.00 488808 102958949 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 100.00 434613 4/25/2019 144710 CONCORD THREADS L.L.C. 598.00 MERCHANDISE 488921 19007 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 598.00 434614 4/25/2019 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 259.62 488874 INV000133957 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 259.62 434615 4/25/2019 140057 CRAFT HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 488803 ED167584 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 434616 4/25/2019 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 14.35 488910 114X70009309 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 14.35 434617 4/25/2019 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 42.93 FILLER CAP 489140 E4-87617 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 40Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434617 4/25/2019 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC Continued... 42.93 434618 4/25/2019 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 1,189.00 MAY NEWSLETTER 488946 318423 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,189.00 434619 4/25/2019 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 12.86 SHIPPING FOR UNIFORMS 488914 94623984 5412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF INSTRUCTION 12.86 434620 4/25/2019 104020 DALCO 640.42 PW SUPPLIES 487662 3436488 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING Supplier 129992 IDCSERVCO BUSINESS SERVICES 640.42 434621 4/25/2019 144724 DAMON SCHRAMM 41.75 UTILITY REFUND 489055 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 41.75 434622 4/25/2019 144718 DAWN WATZ 200.00 REFUND EVBA CAMP 489089 041519 1600.4390.69 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 200.00 434623 4/25/2019 144734 DEREK NORTHENSCOLD 29.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 489094 20190417 1261.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 29.00 434625 4/25/2019 143332 DOWLING, CAITLIN 30.00 GIFT SHOP - BROKEN ITEM 488875 4.18.19 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 30.00 434626 4/25/2019 143023 DUNBAR ARMORED INC 263.76 489035 4393008 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 263.76 489035 4393008 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 263.76 489035 4393008 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON OCCUPANCY 791.28 434627 4/25/2019 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS 8,360.64 MASTER PLAN PROJECT ACCESSORY 488607 0128053A-IN 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 6,771.99 MASTER PLAN PROJECT ACCESSORY 488608 0128053B-IN 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 41Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434627 4/25/2019 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS Continued... 5,723.94 MASTER PLAN PROJECT ACCESSORY 488609 0128053C-IN 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,178.43 MASTER PLAN PROJECT ACCESSORY 488618 0128791-IN 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,943.74 MASTER PLAN PROJECT ACCESSORY 488620 0128879-IN 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 23,978.74 434628 4/25/2019 144410 ECSI 965.00 FIRE CELL COMMUNICATOR 488595 265092 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 270.00 FIRE SUPRESSION REPAIR 488594 265234 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,790.00 FIRE CELL COMMUNICATOR 488588 265238 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5,025.00 434629 4/25/2019 139928 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,398.56 MN-TF1 TRENCH PANELS 489093 20190416 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,398.56 434630 4/25/2019 104645 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL 80.00 FLOWERS FOR VOLUNTEER EVENT 488792 041819 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 80.00 434631 4/25/2019 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 7,705.00 7200 FRANCE TIF ESCROW 488688 79848 9210.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS HRA ADMINISTRATION 6,000.00 7200 FRANCE TIF ESCROW 488687 79849 9210.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS HRA ADMINISTRATION 1,860.00 SOUTHDALE 2 TIF LEGISLATION 488686 79850 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 15,565.00 434632 4/25/2019 144750 ELIZABETH HORTON 66.31 ART ACADEMY 2217 489098 4.17.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 66.31 434633 4/25/2019 139492 ENGLISH STONE 14,163.00 TRANQUILITY GARDEN 488895 000272 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 14,163.00 434634 4/25/2019 144732 EVERGREEN HOMES LLC 159.61 UTILITY REFUND 489063 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 159.61 434635 4/25/2019 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 18.77 WIPER ARM AND BLADE 489134 158-012810 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.52 ARM ASY 489131 1-5923945 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 42Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434635 4/25/2019 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 96.53 FRONT ARM ASY 489127 69-347519 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 525.38 CALIPERS, BRAKES, DRUMS 489128 69-347523 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 162.25 WIPER BLADES 489130 69-347533 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.14 BRAKES, DRUMS, CALIPERS 489129 69-347551 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 303.66 ROTORS, BRAKE LINERS 489144 69-347835 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.08 FILTERS 489145 69-347890 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,271.33 434636 4/25/2019 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 66.20 FASTENERS 488650 MNTC2157272 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 66.20 434637 4/25/2019 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,464.61 CURB STOP REPAIR PARTS 489153 0321339 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,864.03 METERS 489156 0321340 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 4,328.64 434638 4/25/2019 141837 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 148.71 COFFEE 488697 419675 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 148.71 434639 4/25/2019 144729 FRANK MERRILL 71.13 UTILITY REFUND 489060 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 71.13 434640 4/25/2019 142024 FSSOLUTIONS 502.65 1Q DOT FSS INVOICE 488681 FL00286147 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 502.65 434641 4/25/2019 102456 GALLS INC. 243.99 RESERVE UNIFORMS 488868 BC0814149 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 243.99 434642 4/25/2019 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 624.00 MERCHANDISE 488911 41621915 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 624.00 434643 4/25/2019 144733 GEORGE SHERMAN 295.97 UTILITY REFUND 489064 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 295.97 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 43Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434643 4/25/2019 144733 GEORGE SHERMAN Continued... 434644 4/25/2019 132603 GOLFNOW G1 LLC 2,500.00 GOLFNOW ANNUAL LEASE 488925 5100176911 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,500.00 434645 4/25/2019 101103 GRAINGER 78.28 BUCKETS FOR NEW/USED TOWELS 488907 9147656467 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 66.60 SAFETY SIGNS 489117 9150202282 5915.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT 148.54 FIRST AID KITS AND OTHER SAFE 489116 9150774496 5915.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT 55.62 PIANO HINGE 489147 9151700664 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.36 EYE WASH SIGNS 489164 9152659273 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 377.40 434646 4/25/2019 140010 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE 396.00 MARCH EAP INVOICE 488680 W815840 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 396.00 434647 4/25/2019 142628 GUZIK, SHEILA 173.00 YOUTHTECH REFUND 488403 4.12.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 173.00 434648 4/25/2019 100788 H&L MESABI 732.00 CURB RUNNERS 489125 003748 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 661.54 POLY BLADE 489124 003774 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,285.44 PLOW BLADES 487718 03749 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,678.98 434649 4/25/2019 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 244.99 BLACK DIRT FOR PLOW DAMAGE 489114 2-222508 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 244.99 434650 4/25/2019 143954 HARSMA, KRISTIN 108.00 TWO MODELING SESSIONS FOR 4630 488793 4.18.19 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 108.00 434651 4/25/2019 100797 HAWKINS INC. 10,536.92 CHEMICALS FOR WATER TREATMENT 489157 4480702 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 10,536.92 434652 4/25/2019 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 44Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434652 4/25/2019 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS Continued... 28,534.51 APRIL HP INVOICE-NONACTIVES 488872 88993228 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 333,013.56 MAY HP INVOICE 488871 89008898 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 361,548.07 434653 4/25/2019 100799 HEDBERG SUPPLY 118.80 PEA GRAVEL FOR DRAINAGE 488908 1037084 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 118.80 434654 4/25/2019 115599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 448.88 30% OF PROCEEDS CA#2018-0529 488807 0417192 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 448.88 434655 4/25/2019 101871 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN. 100.00 DUES 489087 041719 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 434656 4/25/2019 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 408.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488956 64364734 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 408.00 434657 4/25/2019 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,026.50 488726 133057 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 534.00 489109 133457 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,260.20 489003 134534 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,053.50 489021 134592 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,874.20 434658 4/25/2019 144739 HOLLYCE PHILLIPS 33.81 UTILITY REFUND 489072 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 33.81 434659 4/25/2019 144719 HOME 360 LLC 95.76 UTILITY REFUND 489049 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 95.76 434660 4/25/2019 103932 HOPKINS POLICE DEPARTMENT 35.00 REGIONAL RESPONSE LUDGATE 489015 042219 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 434661 4/25/2019 142261 IMHOLTE, PAUL 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 45Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434661 4/25/2019 142261 IMHOLTE, PAUL Continued... 450.00 BARNYARD BABIES EVENT 489017 041920191 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 450.00 434662 4/25/2019 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 166.05 488727 75866 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 126.00 489101 76107 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 869.72 488949 76108 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,161.77 434663 4/25/2019 144727 JAMES AURORA 59.97 UTILITY REFUND 489058 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 59.97 434664 4/25/2019 144730 JAMES COX ESTATE 100.00 UTILITY REFUND 489061 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.00 434665 4/25/2019 144758 JEANNE HARO 30.00 REFUND-MAH JONGG CLASS 488794 04192019 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 30.00 434666 4/25/2019 144737 JIM WRIGHT 251.81 UTILITY REFUND 489068 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 251.81 434667 4/25/2019 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,432.05 489106 2951598 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 50.90 489107 2971599 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,570.20 488950 2971600 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 104.00 488952 2971601 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.55 488747 2971602 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,060.45 488748 2971603 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 963.90 489173 2971628 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,207.05 434668 4/25/2019 144743 JOHN PETERSON 200.00 UTILITY REFUND 489076 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 200.00 434669 4/25/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 46Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434669 4/25/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 1.19 488833 01267394 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 148.00 488833 01267394 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 488752 1267388 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 727.27 488752 1267388 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.09 488753 1267389 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,143.90 488753 1267389 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.30 488751 1267390 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 951.98 488751 1267390 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 488749 1267391 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,405.47 488749 1267391 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488750 1267392 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 124.75 488750 1267392 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488759 1267394 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 148.00 488759 1267394 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488755 1267395 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 175.00 488755 1267395 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17.85 488976 1267396 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,147.59 488976 1267396 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 488979 1267397 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 109.00 488979 1267397 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.68 488977 1267398 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,698.47 488977 1267398 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.40 488972 1267399 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,601.42 488972 1267399 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 488980 1267400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 290.00 488980 1267400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.80 488975 1267401 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,010.64 488975 1267401 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 488981 1267402 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 733.10 488981 1267402 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.07 488978 1267403 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,016.03 488978 1267403 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 26.18 488757 1267407 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,661.48 488757 1267407 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 488754 1267409 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,048.00 488754 1267409 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.23 488837 1267410 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 864.45 488837 1267410 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 34.51 488758 1267411 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 47Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434669 4/25/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 2,853.28 488758 1267411 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .20 488838 1267412 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 141.05 488838 1267412 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.28 488756 1267413 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,237.00 488756 1267413 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 488836 1267414 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 23,519.83 434670 4/25/2019 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 15.00 DEPARTMENT CHECKBOOK 489095 04/17/2019 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 456.50 DEPARTMENT CHECKBOOK 489095 04/17/2019 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 471.50 434671 4/25/2019 144736 KENT SAVRE 22.14 UTILITY REFUND 489067 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 22.14 434672 4/25/2019 144768 KERSTEN, MICHELLE 89.00 REFUND SKYHAWKS FLAG LEAGUE 489031 042219 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 89.00 434673 4/25/2019 144717 KRISTEN RITER 41.00 MEMBER DISCOUNT REFUND 489082 4.15.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 41.00 434674 4/25/2019 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 1,295.00 TOW FEES FOR 7 CASES 488806 0417191 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 1,295.00 434675 4/25/2019 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 1,095.32 SCREWS,COUPLINGS, CONNECTORS 488648 9306644227 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 974.00 FITTINGS, BITS, SILICONE 489148 9306657706 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,069.32 434676 4/25/2019 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 568.94 MARCH WC DEDUCTIBLE 2 488679 1003628-4/1/19 #2 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 568.94 434677 4/25/2019 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 48Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434677 4/25/2019 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Continued... 336.97 PD CLAIM LOSS 2-24-19 488859 4422 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 336.97 434678 4/25/2019 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30,009.68 MARCH WC DEDUCTIBLE 488870 1003628-4/1/19 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 30,009.68 434679 4/25/2019 140852 LEGENDARY HOLDINGS INC. 2,692.52 OUTING MERCHANDISE 488915 187923 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,692.52 434680 4/25/2019 144766 LI, YAOCEN 13.69 ART ACADEMY 2217 489030 4.22.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 13.69 434681 4/25/2019 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 1,728.47 APRIL CI AND ACC INVOICE 488854 A1960627-4/19 9900.2033.28 ACCIDENT AND CRITICAL INS PAYROLL CLEARING 1,728.47 434682 4/25/2019 144426 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS, LLC 1,596.04 488866 46449 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 887.79 488867 46450 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,946.40 488865 46941 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 759.72 488864 46942 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10,189.95 434683 4/25/2019 116575 LIFELINE INC. 4,130.00 TRAINING 489152 LL-11610 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 4,130.00 434684 4/25/2019 136027 LINA 5,024.11 APRIL LTD INVOICE 488855 04160051180000 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 5,024.11 434685 4/25/2019 144765 LINTON, MICHAEL 340.00 YOUTHTECH REFUND 489029 4.22.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 340.00 434686 4/25/2019 101455 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 2,200.00 TRAINING 488804 041719TRN 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 49Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434686 4/25/2019 101455 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER Continued... 2,200.00 434687 4/25/2019 133185 LOGAN, PATRICK 59.06 CLEANING SUPPLIES 488896 416 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 59.06 434688 4/25/2019 139469 LUBE TECH LIQUID RECYCLING 100.00 USED OIL PICK UP 489141 1363240 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 434689 4/25/2019 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 251.00 488835 20128 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 251.00 434690 4/25/2019 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 2,361.20 488655 404384 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1,580.80 489151 404410 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 3,942.00 434691 4/25/2019 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 8,297.20 FUEL 489160 21260233 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,222.08 FUEL 489162 21260415 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,380.55 FUEL 489161 418036 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 597.27 FUEL 489146 420412 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23,497.10 434692 4/25/2019 144752 MARION HURLEY 78.00 REFUND-HELLO DOLLY TRIP 489100 04172019 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 78.00 434693 4/25/2019 144725 MARK ABDEL 161.03 UTILITY REFUND 489056 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 161.03 434694 4/25/2019 144746 MARK COVILLE 19.69 UTILITY REFUND 489084 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 19.69 434695 4/25/2019 143777 MARK PROPERTIES LLC 223.23 UTILITY REFUND 489066 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 50Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434695 4/25/2019 143777 MARK PROPERTIES LLC Continued... 223.23 434696 4/25/2019 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 573.13 OXYGEN - ST. 2 489086 19525066 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 573.13 434697 4/25/2019 144720 MATTHEW PEARSON 57.28 UTILITY REFUND 489050 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 57.28 434698 4/25/2019 101987 MENARDS 119.09-LUMBER RETURN 488778 69733 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 122.08 COUNTER TOP BRACKETS 488777 69853 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2.99 434699 4/25/2019 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 6.06 NUT AND WASHER 489139 513424 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.06 434700 4/25/2019 144723 MICHAEL GREIN 55.11 UTILITY REFUND 489053 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 55.11 434701 4/25/2019 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.38 488597 180129885 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.51 488599 180129886 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.13 488598 180129887 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 43.02 434702 4/25/2019 100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 297.00 KEY BOX INSTALLATION 488584 790299 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 297.00 434703 4/25/2019 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 631.00 BROCHURES 489025 27290 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 631.00 434704 4/25/2019 132597 MIXMI BRANDS LLC 80.00 FROZEN YOGURT 488677 3359 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 80.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 51Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434704 4/25/2019 132597 MIXMI BRANDS LLC Continued... 434705 4/25/2019 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 189.00 488760 4322 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 189.00 488841 4323 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 378.00 434706 4/25/2019 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 2,800.00 MN GOLFER MAGAZINE 488897 2019-90576 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,800.00 434707 4/25/2019 130266 MUNICODE 731.00 SUPPLEMENT 10, UPDATE 3 488879 00326477 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 731.00 434708 4/25/2019 144753 MYKEN EDWARDS 70.00 REFUND SMALL WONDERS 489108 041719 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 70.00 434709 4/25/2019 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 200.71 CELL PHONE FEB AND MARCH 2019 489091 041519 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 200.71 434710 4/25/2019 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 6.00 488728 142229 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.00 488728 142229 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 488948 142231 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 912.00 488948 142231 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.00 488761 142236 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 792.00 488761 142236 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,066.00 434711 4/25/2019 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 22.80 488586 13167 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 22.80 434712 4/25/2019 144754 NIENOW CULTURAL CONSULTANTS LLC 4,160.00 ARCHEOLOGY STUDY 488886 2019-25 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 4,160.00 434713 4/25/2019 104350 NIKE USA INC. 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 52Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434713 4/25/2019 104350 NIKE USA INC.Continued... 188.21 488667 9932372002 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 65.21 MERCHANDISE 488913 9932630170 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 253.42 434714 4/25/2019 144747 NORA WATTS 170.00 REFUND TRAVELIN' TEENS 489092 041619 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 170.00 434715 4/25/2019 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 96.86 STROBE LIGHTS, LENS 488784 48009 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 410.19 STROBE LIGHTS 489137 48032 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.15 SAFETY BEACONS 489142 48043 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 609.20 434716 4/25/2019 142201 NORTHWEST LIGHTING SYSTEMS CO. 258.46 LED POOL 488583 111682 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 84.00 EM LIGHTS PER FIRE MARSHALL 488876 111751 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 342.46 434717 4/25/2019 141232 NR PROPERTIES INC. 93.19 UTILITY REFUND 489078 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 93.19 434718 4/25/2019 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 57.38 BATTERIES AND FOLDERS 488903 297591839001 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 27.96 PAPER 488904 297592199001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 22.29 POST IT NOTES 488905 297592200001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 107.63 434719 4/25/2019 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 35.10 LANGUAGE LINE 489150 W19030645 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.10 434720 4/25/2019 101659 ORKIN 26.02 PEST CONTROL CENTER TRASH 488770 178989835 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 26.02 PEST CONTROL SOUTH RAMP 488772 178990718 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 30.00 PEST CONTROL NORTH RAMP 488771 178991561 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 90.00 PEST CONTROL 488693 184919544 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL #3 488700 184919589 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL #5 488694 184919627 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 53Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434720 4/25/2019 101659 ORKIN Continued... 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL #7 488701 184919672 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL#6 488702 184932079 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL # 9 488703 184932136 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL #15 488704 184932185 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL# 16 488706 184932258 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL # 17 488705 184932325 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL # 18 488707 184932367 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL # 19 488711 184932469 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 90.00 PEST CONTROL WELL #20 488712 184932588 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 135.00 PEST CONTROL PLANT # 2 488710 184932646 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 135.00 PEST CONTROL WELL #3 488709 184932718 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 135.00 PEST CONTROL WELL#4 488708 184932751 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 180.00 PEST CONTROL PLANT #6 488713 184932808 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 1,747.04 434721 4/25/2019 144735 PATRICA HADDAD 311.19 UTILITY REFUND 489065 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 311.19 434722 4/25/2019 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 5.25 488729 47548 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 341.00 488729 47548 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.25 489102 47551 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 128.00 489102 47551 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 488973 47555 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 810.20 488973 47555 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.25 488974 47556 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 87.00 488974 47556 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,384.95 434723 4/25/2019 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 655.10 488982 28516652 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 600.21 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488671 31174554 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 259.60 488832 78155962 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,514.91 434724 4/25/2019 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 926.00 488730 2537638 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,575.00 488965 2537639 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,575.00 488762 2537640 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 54Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434724 4/25/2019 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 7.73 488845 2538473 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 370.00 488845 2538473 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.61 488844 2538474 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,812.50 488844 2538474 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 488828 2538475 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,012.50 488828 2538475 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .60 488955 2538476 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 69.02 488960 2538477 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,210.65 488960 2538477 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 488967 2538478 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 256.65 488967 2538478 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.52 488851 2538482 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,017.80 488851 2538482 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 29.75 488850 2538483 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,979.81 488850 2538483 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14,884.66 434725 4/25/2019 100119 PING 169.31 MERCHANDISE 488916 14666087 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 22.64 MERCHANDISE 488922 14668409 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 191.95 434726 4/25/2019 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 488585 353776 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 434727 4/25/2019 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 62.40 488873 6239432 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 48.55 PEST CONTROL 488773 6240136 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 110.95 434728 4/25/2019 143365 POPPITZ, RICHARD 199.99 SAFETY BOOTS 489123 042419RP 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.99 434729 4/25/2019 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5,124.86 EDITION EDINA MAY POSTAGE 488795 041819 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 5,124.86 434730 4/25/2019 141673 PREMIER LIGHTING INC. 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 55Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434730 4/25/2019 141673 PREMIER LIGHTING INC.Continued... 905.87 BRAEMAR ARENA LIGHTING 488814 49779 2710.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAS ADMINISTRATION 905.87 434731 4/25/2019 144745 PRO LAND GROUP 28.98 UTILITY REFUND 489083 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 28.98 434732 4/25/2019 144674 RAMPION USA INC. 817.61 MERCHANDISE 488666 UINV027478 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 817.61 434733 4/25/2019 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 148.39 REPAIRS TO PICKER 488942 92676 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 148.39 434734 4/25/2019 140950 RCM EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC 1,461.00 488652 6941 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,461.00 434735 4/25/2019 144575 RED RIVER KITCHEN/LANCER CATERING 2,874.38 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION EVENT 488720 04152019 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 2,874.38 434736 4/25/2019 144742 RENEE PERRAULT 194.39 UTILITY REFUND 489075 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 194.39 434737 4/25/2019 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 229.00 ABOUT TOWN SALES COMMISSION 488592 319151-7 1130.4318 MISC RETAIL COMMUNICATIONS 229.00 434738 4/25/2019 144726 ROBERT MCENANEY 19.37 UTILITY REFUND 489057 04-15-2019 #2 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 61.94 UTILITY REFUND 488805 4-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 81.31 434739 4/25/2019 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,222.20 MN-TF1 UQT3 SITE VISIT 489079 20190415A 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,222.20 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 56Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434740 4/25/2019 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT Continued... 4,364.30 MN-TF1 UQT3 TTT 489080 20190415B 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 4,364.30 434741 4/25/2019 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 236.69 MN-TF1 UQT3 CONSUMABLE 489081 20190415D 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 236.69 434742 4/25/2019 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 17,801.22 MN-TF1 UQT3 LABOR 489088 20190415C 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 17,801.22 434743 4/25/2019 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 2.25 489004 19-11960 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 169.98 489004 19-11960 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 172.23 434744 4/25/2019 134818 ROSTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8,550.00 BRIDGE WORK. PARTIAL PAYMENT 488718 CENTENNIAL LAKES 47102.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES BRIDGE RPLCMT 8,550.00 434745 4/25/2019 144770 ROTI MODERN MEDITERRANEAN 1,698.28 LIQUOR LICENSE REFUND 489033 04-22-2019 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,698.28 434746 4/25/2019 144741 RUDOLPH RIPPLE 110.00 UTILITY REFUND 489074 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 110.00 434747 4/25/2019 139439 RUE 38 LLC 1.50 489113 5437 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 176.00 489113 5437 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 177.50 434748 4/25/2019 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 2,310.00 SCISSORS LIFT TRAINING 489158 040419 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,310.00 434749 4/25/2019 144751 SARA JAKUC 66.31 ART ACADEMY 2217 489099 4.17.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 57Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434749 4/25/2019 144751 SARA JAKUC Continued... 66.31 434750 4/25/2019 133188 SATHER DESIGN/BUILD INC. 63.30 UTILITY REFUND 489054 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 63.30 434751 4/25/2019 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 3,732.82 AHU-1 FILTERS 488817 145371 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 3,732.82 434752 4/25/2019 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 318.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 488591 04172019 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 318.00 434753 4/25/2019 143535 SCR 7,482.81 WEST CONDESSOR PIPE 488776 W42334 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 6,373.14 WEST BUTTERFLY VALVE 488862 W42338 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 658.41 WEST SELINOID VALVE 488774 W42340 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 14,514.36 434754 4/25/2019 143208 SECURIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT 6,046.76 488813 03312019 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 6,046.76 434755 4/25/2019 144705 SHAKOPEE BREWHALL 112.50 488969 1289 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.50 488846 1290 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 189.00 434756 4/25/2019 137092 SHAKOPEE GRAVEL 76.75 SAND FOR SAND BAGS 488821 368142 5932.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL STORM SEWER 76.13 SAND FOR SAND BAGS 488822 368144 5932.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL STORM SEWER 152.88 434757 4/25/2019 120784 SIGN PRO 59.26 NORTH RAMP - WAYFINDING 488944 14013 9210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT HRA ADMINISTRATION 185.00 DASHER AD PRINTING 488989 14023 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 244.26 434758 4/25/2019 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 58Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434758 4/25/2019 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC Continued... 228.93 FLAGS TO MARK HEADS/ASBUILTS 488661 90258825-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 228.93 434759 4/25/2019 144740 SLOSBURG CO 394.92 UTILITY REFUND 489073 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 394.92 434760 4/25/2019 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 35.98 CHISEL 488791 ARV/39588695 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.37 SOCKET DRIVERS, SCREW DRIVERS 489136 ARV/39603289 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.35 434761 4/25/2019 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY, LLC 252.34 488606 1744C 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 252.34 488605 1745C 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 504.68 434762 4/25/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS .80 489169 11811055 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 160.00 489169 11811055 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 488732 18008458 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.00 488732 18008458 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 489096 1805841 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.20 488731 1808454 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.00 488731 1808454 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.40 489110 1808455 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,808.00 489110 1808455 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .08 488733 1808456 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 28.20 488733 1808456 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.20 488734 1808457 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 704.96 488734 1808457 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36.00 488966 1808459 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,549.71 488966 1808459 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.40 488964 1808460 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 304.90 488964 1808460 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.40 488963 1808461 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,420.60 488963 1808461 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.76 488764 1808462 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,696.95 488764 1808462 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36.87 488766 1808463 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 59Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434762 4/25/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 2,617.10 488766 1808463 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.40 488763 1808464 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 720.00 488763 1808464 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 488765 1808465 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.00 488765 1808465 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 91.32 488853 1809864 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 312.00 488852 1809865 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.40 489170 1811056 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,004.00 489170 1811056 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 489172 1811057 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 92.40 489172 1811057 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.00 489171 1811058 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 901.86 489171 1811058 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 489177 1811059 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 112.00 489177 1811059 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16,381.51 434763 4/25/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 4.00 485925 1795117 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 664.00 485925 1795117 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET Supplier 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 668.00 434764 4/25/2019 144716 SPORCICH, SCOTT 500.00 ESCROW REFUND 488798 ED136756 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 488797 ED160074 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 8,000.00 434765 4/25/2019 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,925.09 NORTH RAMP - OWNERS REP 488945 10930.00-19 MARCH 9243.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50TH AND FRANCE 2 TIF DISTRICT 9,300.00 WVV TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ADA DESIGN 488685 12409.00-2 9235.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 11,225.09 434766 4/25/2019 114639 ST LOUIS PARK FINANCE DIVISION 1,718.07 2018 GRIT PIT FEE 488647 28867 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,718.07 434767 4/25/2019 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 240.00 489179 133068 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 60Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434767 4/25/2019 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 219.00 488767 27130 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 219.00 488962 27131 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 678.00 434768 4/25/2019 144555 STROUD, DALE E 216.26 UTILITY REFUND 489071 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 216.26 434769 4/25/2019 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6,527.65 APRIL SUNLIFE INVOICE-ACTIVES 488858 237716-001-4/19 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 233.80 APRIL SUNLIFE INVOICE-NONACTIV 488856 237716-901-4/19 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 6,761.45 434770 4/25/2019 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 10.36 MERCHANDISE 488912 569539 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 10.36 434771 4/25/2019 141770 SUNNYBROOK CUSTOM HOMES 2,385.00 ESCROW REFUND 488799 ED167729 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,385.00 434772 4/25/2019 141470 SUPERION, LLC 586.67 SERVICE CONTRACTS 489149 230395 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 586.67 434773 4/25/2019 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 527.18 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488672 2947404799 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 527.18 434774 4/25/2019 106673 TAPCO 1,566.00 IN STREET PED SIGN HARDWARE 488649 I630554 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,566.00 434775 4/25/2019 144706 TEEM TECHNOLOGIES, INC 3,635.25 ROOM SCHEDULE DISPLAY 488825 INV-NS-C-5601 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,635.25 434776 4/25/2019 142319 TENFIVE CUSTOM HOMES 2,177.58 ESCROW REFUND 488800 ED167941 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,177.58 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 61Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434776 4/25/2019 142319 TENFIVE CUSTOM HOMES Continued... 434777 4/25/2019 144275 THE PARAMOUNT GROUP LLC 181.65 UTILITY REFUND 489070 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 181.65 434778 4/25/2019 144773 THOMASON, MIKE 45.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 489122 4222019 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 45.00 434779 4/25/2019 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 472.50 LOG ROLLING CLASSES @ A.C.489085 31060 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 472.50 434780 4/25/2019 144744 TIFFANY FANHORST 30.88 UTILITY REFUND 489077 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.88 434781 4/25/2019 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 390.00 APR 2 COUNCIL 488880 M24636 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 390.00 434782 4/25/2019 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 1,806.25 EAST DEHUMIDFIER 488589 19101 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,806.25 434783 4/25/2019 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 6.00 489022 18670 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 684.00 489022 18670 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 690.00 434784 4/25/2019 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 117.80 TLO BILL 488869 04012019 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 117.80 434785 4/25/2019 139024 TRUE SEED & SUPPLY 1,835.00 10 BAGS FWY/TEE OVERSEED 488663 1660 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,835.00 434786 4/25/2019 143910 TRUST IN US 29.00 Q1 DOT ONSITE TEST 488860 81803 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 62Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434786 4/25/2019 143910 TRUST IN US Continued... 29.00 434787 4/25/2019 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 297.12 AIR FILTERS 488673 0655931-IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 297.12 434788 4/25/2019 134220 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 600.52 2018-2019 DEER REMOVAL SEASON 489165 3003051764 1509.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEER CONTROL 600.52 434789 4/25/2019 103973 ULINE 155.55 GLOVES/CAUTION TAPE 488689 107401684 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,875.56 PALLETS FOR SAND BAGS 489155 107542126 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,031.11 434790 4/25/2019 144738 V R KSHETTRY 130.00 UTILITY REFUND 489069 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 130.00 434791 4/25/2019 144764 VALUSEK, PATRICIA 13.69 PARTIAL REFUND - 2217 489028 4.22.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 13.69 434792 4/25/2019 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 4.15 488601 496802-01 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 4.15 434793 4/25/2019 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 175.50 488970 1118 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.50 434794 4/25/2019 101064 VESSCO INC. 1,224.45 WELL 6 LEVEL TRANSDUCER 489154 76227 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 1,224.45 434795 4/25/2019 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 1,790.67 LED RETRO 488653 S002439216.001 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 162.54 LIGHTING MOTION DETECTOR 488593 S002451882.001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 89.20 EXIT LIGHTING 488717 S002470027.001 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 91.66 EXIT LIGHTING 488958 S002508120.001 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 63Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434795 4/25/2019 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.Continued... 2,134.07 434796 4/25/2019 137833 VIKING TROPHIES AWARDS & RECONGNITION 334.28 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION EVENT 488719 138611 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 334.28 434797 4/25/2019 144654 VINEYARD VINES LLC 1,106.44 MERCHANDISE 488735 981359 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,106.44 434798 4/25/2019 130956 VOLAVKA, LYNDA 160.00 BARNYARD BABIES 489016 04192019 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 160.00 434799 4/25/2019 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 200.91 DUMPSTER CLEAN UP DAY 489180 8057903-2282-2 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 200.91 434800 4/25/2019 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 78.11 VV PARK 488176 0052529-2808-9 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 100.85 FS2 488176 0052529-2808-9 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 142.70 FS1 488176 0052529-2808-9 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 245.34 SENIOR CENTER 488176 0052529-2808-9 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 456.29 CITY HALL 488176 0052529-2808-9 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 458.29 COURTNEY 488176 0052529-2808-9 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 940.46 PW MAINT 488176 0052529-2808-9 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 940.46 PW BUILDG 488176 0052529-2808-9 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,132.36 ROSLAND 488176 0052529-2808-9 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 104.55 ART CENTER 488176 0052529-2808-9 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 54.41 GOLF DOME 488176 0052529-2808-9 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 323.96 POOL 488176 0052529-2808-9 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 157.61 BRAEMAR MAINT 488176 0052529-2808-9 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 347.83 CLUB HOUSE 488176 0052529-2808-9 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 1,831.95 ARENA 488176 0052529-2808-9 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 128.30 GV LIQ 488176 0052529-2808-9 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 199.07 YORK LIQ 488176 0052529-2808-9 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY Supplier 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 7,642.54 434801 4/25/2019 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 64Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434801 4/25/2019 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC.Continued... 296.16 LEAK LOCATE 489014 9484 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 296.16 434802 4/25/2019 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 58.16 OIL 488662 64220 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 58.16 434803 4/25/2019 144721 WILLIAM LADEMAN 58.71 UTILITY REFUND 489051 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 58.71 434804 4/25/2019 144728 WILLIAM PARHAM 65.54 UTILITY REFUND 489059 04-15-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 65.54 434805 4/25/2019 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 28.56 488843 7230824 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,169.00 488843 7230824 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.69 488961 7230825 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,138.00 488961 7230825 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76 488971 7230826 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 80.25 488971 7230826 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28.76 488849 7230827 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,470.00 488849 7230827 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 488848 7230828 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 39.50 488848 7230828 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,974.90 434806 4/25/2019 144412 WINEBOW 1.75 488847 MN00057298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 90.00 488847 MN00057298 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.25 489178 MN00057576 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 400.00 489178 MN00057576 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 494.00 434807 4/25/2019 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 392.58 PPE - EHMILLER 488991 E1835147 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 42.99 PPE - EHMILLER 488990 E1835147.001 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 435.57 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 65Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434808 4/25/2019 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY Continued... 252.00 488968 1573 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.00 488842 1574 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.00 434809 4/25/2019 101726 XCEL ENERGY 167.20 2019 CIP ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 488898 51-0012262148-6 /4/19 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 270.09 488889 632432424 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 437.29 434810 5/2/2019 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 197.00 489201 E-9428 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 197.00 434811 5/2/2019 136911 ACCOLADE USA INC. 283.57 STAFF UNIFORMS 489305 300892 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 283.57 434812 5/2/2019 129458 ACME TOOLS 584.96 489272 6553937 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 275.00 489389 6561227 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 859.96 434813 5/2/2019 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 352.45 MERCHANDISE 489464 907318843 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 352.45 434814 5/2/2019 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 150.00 PLAYBACK EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 489390 SVCINV17954 1132.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE COMMISSION 150.00 434815 5/2/2019 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 7.99 PADDLELOCK 489562 11RY-RWPT-JT7W 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 39.96 MNTF-1 REIMBURSABLE SUBMITTED 489607 13YR-JYHV-6MH3 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 264.42 JUMP STARTER 489537 16TC-DWLG-14RH 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.99 ROLLERS 489566 16TC-DWLG-PVNL 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 313.02 FIRST AID KITS 489523 19GK-TT9V-K7D4 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 104.34 FIRST AID KITS 489523 19GK-TT9V-K7D4 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 285.31 PRINTER FOR MDT2 489257 1CD4-679F-LFWP 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 285.31 SPARE SQUAD PRINTER 489257 1CD4-679F-LFWP 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 66Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434815 5/2/2019 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 79.98 FIRE STICKS OUTING DISPLAY 489320 1FYR-MYFT-JCFK 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 118.78 489530 1FYR-MYFT-Q7HW 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 169.98 489530 1FYR-MYFT-Q7HW 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 383.43 CUSTOM GAMES FOR MULTI-USE 489319 1FYR-MYFT-QQ9R 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 69.36 489394 1GKH-JK7T-4VHT 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 74.84 PAINT ADDITIVE 489561 1H7Y-JMWF-11GX 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 79.00 TRASH RECEPTACLE 489392 1H7Y-JMWF-JF3F 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 79.98 DRIVE DOCK AND MAC OS 489391 1HXV-WDW6-11LR 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 252.92 FIBERGLASS REPAIR KITS 489565 1LCM-3KMN-Q7KD 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 41.74 BARNYARD BABIES 489395 1PPF-GRXC-D4YG 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 30.76 FILTER 489336 1PYC-N6YQ-C3RY 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.98 CUBICAL WALL MOUNTING PINS 489295 1QRL-7GFV-7FCV 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 113.11 TAPE, GARBAGE BAGS, DOOR STOPS 489393 1QTY-1YPL-1MTN 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 149.93 POND FILTER BAGS 489250 1XMT-YH1X-NTMK 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 25.45 MEASURING CUP, PITCHER 489263 1XMT-YH1X-Q7HF 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.00-CREDIT FOR OSMO CABLE RETURN 489560 1YHL-N6NQ-46H6 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 2,985.58 434816 5/2/2019 108617 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS 120.38 LAPEL PINS 489608 INV04093266 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.38 434817 5/2/2019 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 160.76 LAUNDRY 489285 1004452505 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.18 LAUNDRY 489559 1004456548 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.94 434818 5/2/2019 141691 ANDERSON, WENDY S. 2,275.00 WINTER YOGA CLASSES 489396 006 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,275.00 434819 5/2/2019 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3,101.40 489388 3340546 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,565.95 489481 3340548 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.36-489463 455983 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,651.99 434820 5/2/2019 106304 ASPEN MILLS 238.15 UNIFORMS - 2019 KEARNS 489280 77746 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 238.15 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 67Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434820 5/2/2019 106304 ASPEN MILLS Continued... 434821 5/2/2019 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 7.58 FILTER 489588 038087282 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.58 FILTERS 489605 038087516 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.16 434822 5/2/2019 104416 B.J. MULCAHY COMPANY INC. 900.52 GLYCOL HEAT/COOL LOOP 489287 368504 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 900.52 434823 5/2/2019 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 546.00 PIZZA 489230 4813930 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 156.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 489397 4815679 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 702.00 434824 5/2/2019 125139 BERNICK'S 1,055.74 489193 497276 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 65.60 489352 497280 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,034.04 489353 497281 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,155.38 434825 5/2/2019 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 144.00 489354 4185 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 434826 5/2/2019 144797 BLAKEBOROUGH HARDSCAPES 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 489579 169291 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 434827 5/2/2019 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 7.00 489200 160183 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 440.00 489200 160183 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 447.00 434828 5/2/2019 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 47.15 489355 1080960630 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,872.48 489355 1080960630 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.60 489484 1080960632 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 720.00 489484 1080960632 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 34.50 489206 1080960696 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 68Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434828 5/2/2019 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 3,054.00 489206 1080960696 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 489207 1080960697 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,566.57 489207 1080960697 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.30 489203 1080960698 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 60.00 489203 1080960698 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.43 489483 50108096031 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 817.41 489483 50108096031 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,195.44 434829 5/2/2019 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 4,269.15 489196 1090994322 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 489204 1090994324 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,335.30 489204 1090994324 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,683.95 434830 5/2/2019 104481 BREDE EXPOSITION SERVICES 985.00 SKATE SHOW CURTAIN 489339 984069 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 985.00 434831 5/2/2019 144779 BROOKE ROSONKE 180.00 PLAYGROUND REFUND 489293 042519 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 180.00 434832 5/2/2019 137991 BRUSKE PRODUCTS 90.04 BLADE, SQUEEGEE HOLDER 489531 60298 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 371.00 BRUSH 489606 60377 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 461.04 434833 5/2/2019 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 421.20 MERCHANDISE 489465 930316815 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 421.20 434834 5/2/2019 103110 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY 500.00 INTERLACHEN WM PERMIT REVIEW 489328 20190424 05578.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Vernon Interlachen WM 500.00 434835 5/2/2019 143136 CANTEEN REFRESHMENT SERVICES 104.41 CARIBOU COFFEE 489238 141780000059241 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 104.41 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 69Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434836 5/2/2019 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 1,765.60 489199 119455 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.10-489485 2212274 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 105.60 489219 223535 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.00 489190 2244343 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.00 489195 2253532 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,615.65 489218 2253536 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 130.00 489356 2255342 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 260.00 489486 2255344 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,903.75 434837 5/2/2019 144675 CARLOS CREEK WINERY, INC. 312.00 489357 17147 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 312.00 434838 5/2/2019 129923 CAWLEY COMPANY, THE 31.06 NAME TAG HEIDI LEE 489324 V622606 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 31.06 434839 5/2/2019 144775 CDM SMITH INC. 6,700.00 PACP TRAINING 489310 90071496 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 6,700.00 434840 5/2/2019 123898 CENTURYLINK 63.21 489329 1161-4/19 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 63.21 434841 5/2/2019 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 174.24 SAFETY BOOTS 489331 CB6695 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 186.99 SAFETY BOOTS 489331 CB6695 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 199.74 SAFETY BOOTS 489331 CB6695 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 144.49 SAFETY BOOTS 489331 CB6695 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 705.46 434842 5/2/2019 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 9.94 TOWELS THROUGH CINTAS 489300 4020451167 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.23 LAUNDRY 489346 4020548505 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.15 RENTAL UNIFORM 489343 4020548538 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.04 UNIFORM RENTAL 489345 4020548603 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 10.29 UNIFORM RENTAL 489344 4020548604 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 52.96 RENTAL UNIFORM 489342 4020548615 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 70Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434842 5/2/2019 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION Continued... 20.88 RUG SERVICE 489528 4020867167 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 212.49 434843 5/2/2019 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 112.78 NORTH RAMP EXP-UTILITIES 489398 0200819007-4/19 9243.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50TH AND FRANCE 2 TIF DISTRICT 112.78 434844 5/2/2019 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 1,617.00 MN-TF1 UQT3 TTT 489288 IN34481 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,617.00 434845 5/2/2019 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 896.10 MN-TF1 SPF CONSUMABLES 489289 IN34482 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 896.10 434846 5/2/2019 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 14,843.29 MN-TF1 UQT3 LABOR 489399 IN34480 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 14,843.29 434847 5/2/2019 120433 COMCAST 31.49 CABLE TV 489247 8772 10 614 0373022-4/19 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.49 434848 5/2/2019 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC. 989.40 CONCESSIONS FOOD 489400 7057096 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 989.40 434849 5/2/2019 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 13.92 SHIPPING FOR STAFF SHIRTS 489468 94631341 5412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF INSTRUCTION 13.92 434850 5/2/2019 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 4,292.61 REPLACE DESERT AIRE COMPRESSOR 489402 3218748 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5,091.64 DESERT AIRE DAMPERS, ACTUATOR 489401 3218885 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,256.60 ELEV ROOM EXHAUST FAN/MOTOR 489403 3219237 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 10,640.85 434851 5/2/2019 144794 DANIEL LEPTUCK 60.00 REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 489404 042619 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 71Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434851 5/2/2019 144794 DANIEL LEPTUCK Continued... 60.00 434852 5/2/2019 144781 DARLEEN ROACH 30.00 REFUND-MAH JONGG 489296 04252019 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 30.00 434853 5/2/2019 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 294.50 AUTO START FOR 26-138 489349 1-108303 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 294.50 434854 5/2/2019 138285 DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC. 3,509.60 HDD IMAGER 489405 38997 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,509.60 434855 5/2/2019 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 2,436.00 489332 3492444 4627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ERP System 2,436.00 434856 5/2/2019 144410 ECSI 5,307.02 WIRELESS FIRE MONITORING SYSTE 489410 266043 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 5,307.02 434857 5/2/2019 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 287.50 7008 SANDELL ANALYSIS 489411 79647 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 287.50 434858 5/2/2019 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 3,054.43 BUILD FOR NEW CHIEF CAR 489275 JOR19033 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 3,054.43 434859 5/2/2019 144799 EMILY MCCHESNEY 129.00 REFUND YOUTHTECH 2241 489519 4.29.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 129.00 434860 5/2/2019 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 95.88 ANTIFREEZE 489413 1-5930139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.59 BATTERY 489593 1-5933390 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.10 GLOVES 489589 1-5933526 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 329.80 WIPES 489595 1-5933534 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.93 FILTER 489592 1-5935144 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 72Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434860 5/2/2019 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 23.51 FILTER 489590 1-5935354 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.93 FILTER 489597 1-5935364 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.93 FILTER 489591 1-5935366 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.35 BATTERY 489412 69-348099 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.77 BATTERY 489596 69-348117 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.31 BATTERY 489594 69-348495 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.98 BRAKE LINING 489536 75-340208 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 956.08 434861 5/2/2019 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 911.34 HYDRANT ADAPTERS 489555 0320725 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 157.72 CURB STOPS 489315 0321339-1 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,069.06 434862 5/2/2019 102456 GALLS INC. 76.00-CREDIT UNIFORMS 489224 12519445 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.00-CREDIT 489584 12573495 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 510.33 UNIFORMS 489222 BC0821581 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.00 CSO UNIFORMS 489529 BC0823186 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 434.33 434863 5/2/2019 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 56.16 MERCHANDISE 489304 41623636 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 56.16 434864 5/2/2019 100773 GENERAL PARTS LLC 14.58 PREFILTER CARTRIDGE 489234 1719367 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 14.58 434865 5/2/2019 143454 GLEASON PRINTING 5,051.86 489544 80503 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 5,051.86 434866 5/2/2019 101103 GRAINGER 419.16 GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 489256 9150638089 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 362.56 CIRC PUMP 489286 9152374980 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7.51 SAFETY SIGN 489415 9153359378 5915.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT 151.89 SAW BLADES 489418 9153817524 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.59 FLOOR FINISH 489416 9153817532 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.88 CLEANERS 489419 9153817540 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 73Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434866 5/2/2019 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 50.40 TISSUES 489417 9153914743 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 95.87 TOOLS FOR TIRE REPAIR 489414 9154955208 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,244.80 NEW DRINKING FOUNTAIN 489470 9156164148 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 55.62 LARGE HINGE 489532 9156473473 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,503.28 434867 5/2/2019 138546 GRIMES DESIGN 7,885.00 HYDRANT DIFFUSER'S FOR FLUSHIN 489312 21909 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 7,885.00 434868 5/2/2019 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 240.00 RESTORATION RABUN POND 489420 2-222699 5932.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL STORM SEWER 240.00 434869 5/2/2019 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,333.92 CHEMICALS 489471 4483870 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 330.00 CHLORINE TANK FULL OF WATER DU 489554 4487000 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,663.92 434870 5/2/2019 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 27,424.49 1ST HALF 2019 TAX AND ASSESS 489347 042619 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 15,585.53 1ST HALF 2019 TAX AND ASSESS 489347 042619 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 17.01 1ST HALF 2019 TAX AND ASSESS 489347 042619 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5,265.37 1ST HALF 2019 TAX AND ASSESS 489347 042619 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 929.03 1ST HALF 2019 TAX AND ASSESS 489347 042619 9243.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 50TH AND FRANCE 2 TIF DISTRICT 49,221.43 434871 5/2/2019 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,957.50 489466 134536 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,957.50 434872 5/2/2019 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 301.49 CHLORINE, ACID 489422 190408063 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 890.80 ENZUYME METER, PHOSPHATE REMOV 489421 SV190405010 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,192.29 434873 5/2/2019 144020 HR&A ADVISORS, INC. 660.00 URBAN SYMPOSIUM 489242 2019-413 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 660.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 74Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434874 5/2/2019 101146 IMPACT TELECOM Continued... 112.49 489547 608682700 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 112.49 434875 5/2/2019 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 290.40 489194 76378 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 290.40 489208 76380 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 580.80 434876 5/2/2019 142731 INTERSTATE PARKING COMPANY LLC 9,397.00 NORTH RAMP EXPAN-VALET PARKING 489423 201901 9210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT HRA ADMINISTRATION 9,397.00 434877 5/2/2019 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 104.00 489467 2971629 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 104.00 434878 5/2/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. .59 489387 1272738 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.38 489365 1272740 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 115.15 489365 1272740 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.52 489364 1272741 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,142.49 489364 1272741 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.66 489362 1272742 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,154.88 489362 1272742 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 489363 1272743 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 350.00 489363 1272743 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.25 489361 1272744 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 281.23 489361 1272744 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 489360 1272745 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 111.11 489360 1272745 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 489488 1272747 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.71 489359 1272748 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,389.00 489359 1272748 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 29.75 489489 1272760 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,812.29 489489 1272760 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.82 489490 1272761 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,437.97 489490 1272761 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.37 489491 1272762 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,348.54 489491 1272762 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 489492 1272763 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 75Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434878 5/2/2019 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 270.00 489492 1272763 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28.95 489493 1272764 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,449.63 489493 1272764 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 489494 1272765 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 707.93 489494 1272765 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.18 489495 1272766 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,016.52 489495 1272766 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 489366 1274039 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 138.00 489366 1274039 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19,968.77 434879 5/2/2019 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 43.90 LOCK REPAIR 489279 IN002289 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.90 434880 5/2/2019 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 4,910.00 489557 13499375 03517.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Millenium on 66th 4,910.00 434881 5/2/2019 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER 740.50 MN-TF1 EXPENSES PK-CC 489327 20190424 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 740.50 434882 5/2/2019 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 185.00 TOW BILL FOR 18002070 489290 042419 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 185.00 434883 5/2/2019 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 5,930.00 EMPLOYEE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 489243 SIN7312242 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 5,930.00 434884 5/2/2019 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 248.97 STAINLESS STEAL SCREWS 489424 9306668179 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 248.97 434885 5/2/2019 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 3.00 489225 21574 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 256.00 489225 21574 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 259.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 76Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434886 5/2/2019 141916 LUPULIN BREWING Continued... 360.00 489496 20329 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 288.00 489367 20331 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 648.00 434887 5/2/2019 144792 M POWER PHYSICAL THERAPY 300.00 CLASS 489472 425 5412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GOLF INSTRUCTION 300.00 434888 5/2/2019 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 660.00 "AGENDA: EDINA" HOSTING FEE 489425 245 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 660.00 434889 5/2/2019 142349 MAX TREE FARM 3,690.00 TREES 489569 1021-19 #2 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 3,690.00 434890 5/2/2019 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 170.10 LATCH, BUCKLE 489535 513391 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.92 SWITCH ASY 489601 513497 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.98 HOSE 489534 513503 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.15 JET KIT 489586 513504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.00-CREDIT MEMO 489600 CM512055 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.00-CREDIT MEMO 489599 CM513279 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.00-CREDIT MEMO 489598 CM513326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.15 434891 5/2/2019 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 4,760.00 4713 VALLEY VIEW RD SL REPAIR 489473 35822 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 720.00 6508 WARREN SP REPAIR 489428 35823 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 5,480.00 434892 5/2/2019 116770 MINNEAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT 14,467.77 MN-TF1 MFD UQT3 489429 041819 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 14,467.77 434893 5/2/2019 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 63.96 CASTERS 489430 22622 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.96 434894 5/2/2019 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING CO LLC 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 77Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434894 5/2/2019 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING CO LLC Continued... 9,699.87 PAMELA TURF MAINTENANCE 489508 9103 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 9,699.87 434895 5/2/2019 100899 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 100.00 STATE ELEVATOR PERMIT 489231 ALR00948841 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 100.00 434896 5/2/2019 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 75.00 SHARPEN ZAM BLADES 489268 914 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 75.00 434897 5/2/2019 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.47 LUBRICANT 489587 2122-460119 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.47 434898 5/2/2019 136099 NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 13,175.00 2019 QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 489431 7212 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 13,175.00 434899 5/2/2019 141215 NEGOCE LLC 3.00 489221 302098 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 247.92 489221 302098 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 250.92 434900 5/2/2019 131449 NEUTGENS EXCAVATING 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 489432 166662 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 434901 5/2/2019 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 750.04 489216 140300-REVISED 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.00 489191 142527 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 280.00 489191 142527 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 489217 142528 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 580.00 489217 142528 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.00 489368 142530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 856.00 489368 142530 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,498.04 434902 5/2/2019 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 107.75 STROBE LIGHTS 489434 48070 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 78Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434902 5/2/2019 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Continued... 107.75 434903 5/2/2019 142201 NORTHWEST LIGHTING SYSTEMS CO. 190.00 LAMPS 489444 111837 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 190.00 434904 5/2/2019 141232 NR PROPERTIES INC. 2,270.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 489581 166281 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,270.00 434905 5/2/2019 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 55.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 489273 300203125001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 55.62 434906 5/2/2019 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 27.70 489545 W19030569 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.70 489545 W19030569 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 55.40 489545 W19030569 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 83.10 489545 W19030569 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 83.10 489545 W19030569 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 193.90 489545 W19030569 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 304.70 489545 W19030569 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 55.40 489545 W19030569 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 27.70 489545 W19030569 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 110.80 489545 W19030569 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 124.65 489545 W19030569 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 124.65 489545 W19030569 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 55.40 489545 W19030569 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 83.10 489545 W19030569 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 83.10 489545 W19030569 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 55.40 489545 W19030569 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 291.28 489546 W19030573 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,787.08 434907 5/2/2019 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE, INC. 79.83 SKATE SHOW CABLE 489325 635896 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 79.83 434908 5/2/2019 101659 ORKIN 617.13 PEST CONTROL - ST. 2 489284 28339058-4/19 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 79Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434908 5/2/2019 101659 ORKIN Continued... 1,607.73 PEST CONTROL - ST. 1 489283 28533674-4/19 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,224.86 434909 5/2/2019 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 6,830.00 5801 CHOWEN UTILITY UPGRADE 489333 5178 01451.1705.17 UTILITY COORDINATION Chowen A/B 6,830.00 434910 5/2/2019 144793 PAGE KINNER 63.00 REFUND TENNIS 489446 042619 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 63.00 434911 5/2/2019 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 13.75 489205 48465 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,096.20 489205 48465 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 489220 48468 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 921.20 489220 48468 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 489369 48470 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 859.50 489369 48470 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,910.65 434912 5/2/2019 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 212.83 PEPSI 489447 31841462 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 409.24 CONCESSIONS FOOD 489337 76104001 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 622.07 434913 5/2/2019 140795 PETERSON, MANDY 170.00 TRAVELIN' TEENS REFUND 489448 042619 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 170.00 434914 5/2/2019 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1.19 489499 1272767 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3.57 489371 2542123 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 482.25 489371 2542123 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.52 489370 2542124 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 493.20 489370 2542124 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 489497 2542130 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,533.25 489497 2542130 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 52.36 489498 2542131 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,577.55 489498 2542131 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,168.36 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 80Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434914 5/2/2019 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 434915 5/2/2019 100119 PING 761.27 MERCHANDISE 489303 14671801 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 141.66 MERCHANDISE 489306 14677301 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 902.93 434916 5/2/2019 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 103.99 PW REPAIR 489510 #985103103965 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 103.99 434917 5/2/2019 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 950.00 489515 IN200-1020950 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 950.00 434918 5/2/2019 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 66.28 GLOVES 489264 66726 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.28 434919 5/2/2019 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 840.00 489500 5578 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 238.00 489372 5580 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,078.00 434920 5/2/2019 138848 PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION 4,594.00 ANNUAL MAINT. FEE-ALARM BILLIN 489474 231355 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,594.00 434921 5/2/2019 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 489226 04242019RC 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 500.00 434922 5/2/2019 138776 RAO, PALLU 106.00 REFUND ART CAMP K 489517 4.29.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 106.00 434923 5/2/2019 144796 REALITY BASED TRAINING ASSOCIATION 19,500.00 INSTRUCTOR FEES K. MURRAY 489479 20190401-1/PART #2 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 19,500.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 81Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434924 5/2/2019 108672 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Continued... 11,233.00 489475 340026730 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 11,233.00 434925 5/2/2019 144351 REHDER FORESTRY CONSULTING 65.60 OAK WILT INSPECTIONS 489577 EDC004 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 65.60 434926 5/2/2019 125936 REINDERS INC. 7,740.11 PESTICIDES AND FERTILIZER 489604 3061608-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 7,740.11 434927 5/2/2019 144767 RICHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,450.00 REFUND FOR COURSE 489251 042219 7401.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PSTF REVENUE 1,450.00 434928 5/2/2019 144782 ROBERT BROOKE & ASSOCICATES 26.17 BATHROOM DOOR 489513 #400036641 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 26.17 434929 5/2/2019 122600 ROE, JOAN 25.00 REFUND- VOL RECOGNITION TICKET 489245 042319 1100.4391 OTHER FEES CITY COUNCIL 25.00 434930 5/2/2019 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 37.50 489373 19-11989 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,800.00 489373 19-11989 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,837.50 434931 5/2/2019 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 183.45 BRAKE CLEANER 489265 79457404 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.45 434932 5/2/2019 144553 SALTCO MSP LLC 70.00 SALT TANK RENT 489266 18215REVISED 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 70.00 434933 5/2/2019 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 171.06 FILTERS 489568 145415 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 171.06 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 82Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434934 5/2/2019 132076 SCHERBER CO. LLC Continued... 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 489582 ED167798 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 434935 5/2/2019 140798 SCHULTZ, ERIN 101.00 REFUND ART CAMP VV 489518 4.29.19 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 101.00 434936 5/2/2019 144705 SHAKOPEE BREWHALL 76.50 489282 1288 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.50 434937 5/2/2019 101556 SHRED-IT USA 102.78 SHREDDING SERVICES 489450 8127122958 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102.78 434938 5/2/2019 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 43.85 TIME CLOCK RENTAL 489228 13088721 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 43.85 434939 5/2/2019 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 74.15 DRAINAGE BASINS ON NEW COURSE 489302 90390473-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 74.15 434940 5/2/2019 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 60.24 THERMOMETERS 489539 ARV/39723762 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.24 434941 5/2/2019 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 6,634.00 Q2 FEES 489330 9667 1470.6221 RANGE RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9,907.00 Q2 FEES 489330 9667 1400.6221 RANGE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16,541.00 434942 5/2/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3.20 489502 1687829-REVISED 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 916.80 489502 1687829-REVISED 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 58.74 489202 1810389 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 489211 1811060 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 104.00 489211 1811060 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 35.20 489210 1811061 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,068.00 489210 1811061 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 83Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434942 5/2/2019 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 1.68 489213 1811062 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 316.20 489213 1811062 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.28 489214 1811063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 564.66 489214 1811063 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 489212 1811064 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 152.00 489212 1811064 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.60 489377 1811065 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,296.00 489377 1811065 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.00 489376 1811066 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 202.30 489376 1811066 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 35.20 489375 1811067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,114.28 489375 1811067 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.80 489379 1811068 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 297.00 489379 1811068 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 489374 1811069 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.00 489374 1811069 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.20 489378 1811070 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,628.14 489378 1811070 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.80 489501 1812462 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 400.00 489501 1812462 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15,323.48 434943 5/2/2019 144772 SPEC. RESCUE INTERNATIONAL INC 27,320.00 MN-TF1 TECH SEARCH TUITION 489252 19-41023 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 27,320.00 434944 5/2/2019 144774 SS 567 UNIVERSITY 14.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 489223 042419 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 186.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 489223 042419 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 434945 5/2/2019 144780 STACI SYBESMA 17.09 RENTAL REFUND 489294 042519 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 227.10 RENTAL REFUND 489294 042519 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 244.19 434946 5/2/2019 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 594.00 489380 27251 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 165.00 489209 27252 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 759.00 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 84Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434946 5/2/2019 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 434947 5/2/2019 102262 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS INC. 1,450.00 489520 19PLAN-IT-103 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 1,450.00 434948 5/2/2019 144798 SUSA 250.00 ANNUAL MEMBER DUES 489516 4292019 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 250.00 434949 5/2/2019 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 990.34 CONCESSION PRODUCT 489229 247393404 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 706.31 CONCESSION PRODUCT 489232 247404389 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 812.92 CONCESS3 489452 247415720 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 28.56 POPCORN FOR TIFFANY B.489240 247415721 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 2,538.13 434950 5/2/2019 104932 TAYLOR MADE 1,726.30 MERCHANDISE 489458 033505892 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,531.20-RETURNED DOUBLE SHIPMENT 489476 33679633 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 487.20-RETURNED DOUBLE SHIPMENT 489477 33682881 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 76.41 MERCHANDISE 489478 33686186 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 95.59 MERCHANDISE 489456 33686355 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 153.64 MERCHANDISE 489457 33686510 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 33.54 434951 5/2/2019 144692 THOMAS WALSH 28.65 UTILITY REFUND 488378 04-11-2019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 28.65 434952 5/2/2019 132108 TOLL, DEREK 127.78 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 489507 04242019 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 127.78 434953 5/2/2019 143306 TOLLBERG HOMES, LLC 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 489453 166448 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 434954 5/2/2019 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 217.80 COPIER 489454 69565264 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 217.80 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 85Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434954 5/2/2019 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES Continued... 434955 5/2/2019 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 2,539.00 HORNETS RTU 4 HEAT EXCHANGER 489455 019059 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,198.89 SOUTH MUNTERS 489270 019097 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 881.50 HORNETS RTU REPAIR 489269 19016 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 163.00 MAU REPAIR 489526 19127 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,782.39 434956 5/2/2019 123649 TOWMASTER 75.74 ONSPOT NUT ADAPTERS 489435 415322 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.74 434957 5/2/2019 143772 TRADE TOOLS INC. 74.00 LUBRICANT 489271 281743 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 74.00 434958 5/2/2019 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 6.00 489198 18669 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 684.00 489198 18669 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.00 489197 186691 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 240.00 489197 186691 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 933.00 434959 5/2/2019 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 116.00 MERCHANDISE 489460 3631555 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,758.64 MERCHANDISE 489459 3631584 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,874.64 434960 5/2/2019 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 483.98 DOOR HARDWARE 489578 PS10018954 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 483.98 434961 5/2/2019 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 1,041.00 GRASS SEED AND SEED AIDE 489313 44116 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 129.25 STARTER FERTILIZER FOR SEED 489316 44131 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 409.00 RESTORATION SUPPLIES WMB 489552 44188 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 196.00 RESTORATION MATERIAL RABUN PON 489551 44194 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,775.25 434962 5/2/2019 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 86Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434962 5/2/2019 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN Continued... 303.93 BASES 489573 1501-010155 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 223.96 PAINT 489576 1501-010176 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 167.97 FIELD PAINT 489574 1501-010177 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 76.50 BASE 489575 1501-010204 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 21.99 PAINT WAND 489572 1501-010218 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 179.99 LAX NETTING 489571 1501-010248 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 974.34 434963 5/2/2019 134839 VACKER INC. 1,388.00 HOLE MARKER SIGNS 489249 2127 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,388.00 434964 5/2/2019 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 85.50 489381 1117 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.50 434965 5/2/2019 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 535.58 WINDSHIELDS FOR CARTS 489308 19277 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 32.76 SOLENOID 489585 19690 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 568.34 434966 5/2/2019 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 395.28 LED TRACK REPLACEMENTS 489233 S002500935.001 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,431.00 LED RETRO LAMPS 489311 S002501883.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 117.00 EXIT/EM LIGHTS 489438 S002508120.002 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 521.02 EXIT/EMERG. LIGHTING REPAIRS 489436 S002516644.001 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 49.77 ELECTRICAL FOR SMOOTHIE MACHIN 489437 S002517695.001 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 91.66-EXIT/EM LIGHTS 489439 S002528387.001 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 3,422.41 434967 5/2/2019 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 64.95 TRAINING SEMMINAR 489440 208264 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 44.95 TRAFFIC CONTROL SEMINAR 489248 208265 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 109.90 434968 5/2/2019 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 352.69 HYDRAULIC FLUID FOR MOWERS 489461 65063 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 352.69 434969 5/2/2019 137134 WEIERS, STEVE 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 87Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434969 5/2/2019 137134 WEIERS, STEVE Continued... 113.36 UNIFORM PANTS 489462 042619SW 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 113.36 434970 5/2/2019 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 26.18 489385 7231820 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,245.00 489385 7231820 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 42.84 489505 7231822 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,370.00 489505 7231822 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,684.02 434971 5/2/2019 144412 WINEBOW 132.00-489386 1629 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.50-489386 1629 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.25 489215 MN00057560 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 156.00 489215 MN00057560 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.75 434972 5/2/2019 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 604.00-CREDIT BECAUSE OF EARLY ORDER 486730 000062950633 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 66.22-SYNGENTA PROGRAM CREDIT 478063 62824002 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 733.74 SOLUBLE/GRANULAR FERT 489301 63037702 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 63.52 434973 5/2/2019 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1.13 ELECTRICAL COVER 489326 176065 01 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 110.72 JUMPER ELEC. REPAIR/FIRE CODE 489237 176092 01 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 25.23 OLD WEST ZAM ROOM OUTLET 489314 176113 01 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5.36 WEST GARAGE DOOR CORD 489441 176202 01 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 27.60 VAL LIGHT SWITCH 489522 176297 01 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 195.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 489563 176308 01 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 68.75 ELECTRICAL WIRE 489564 176348 02 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 112.50 EXIT LIGHTING 489567 176364 01 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 546.62 434974 5/2/2019 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 84.00 489506 1584 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 84.00 434975 5/2/2019 100300 WRIGHT COUNTY 100.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 489227 04242019WC 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:05:26R55CKR2LOGIS101 88Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 434975 5/2/2019 100300 WRIGHT COUNTY Continued... 100.00 434976 5/2/2019 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 12,617.00 VVRD SIDEWALK PHASE 2 489350 R-010516-000-14 07153.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Valley View Rd Ped Bridge 4,344.00 W 58TH P2 489550 R-013448-000-3 01456.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN W 58th St 16,961.00 434977 5/2/2019 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 106.25 SAFETY CABINET 489278 54066694 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 106.25 434978 5/2/2019 143318 ZEHNDER HOMES 2,270.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 489580 166760 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 489442 167459 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 4,770.00 2,124,467.69 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 2,124,467.69 Total Payments 2,124,467.69 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:24R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 4/20/20184/20/2018 - Company Amount 110,828.2601000GENERAL FUND 1,112.6304000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 20,505.1004200EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 78.5005100ART CENTER FUND 260.0005200GOLF DOME FUND 99.9905300AQUATIC CENTER FUND 76,479.5605400GOLF COURSE FUND 8,689.4205500ICE ARENA FUND 879.1705550SPORTS DOME FUND 4,200.0605700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,347.0105750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 33,125.7605800LIQUOR FUND 4,941.5505900UTILITY FUND 9,160.1205930STORM SEWER FUND 471.5907400PSTF AGENCY FUND Report Totals 272,178.72 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7977 4/18/2019 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 136.22 RAIL SLIDE 488434 0159448-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 136.22 7978 4/18/2019 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 582.76 COFFEE FOR LUNCH ROOM 488426 1361869 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 582.76 7979 4/18/2019 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 104.00-CREDIT LEGAL ADV 484066 198940CM 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 704.00 EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEY 488186 200899 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 600.00 7980 4/18/2019 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1.55 488188 0069085500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120.00 488188 0069085500 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.55 488190 0069085600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120.00 488190 0069085600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.10 488189 0069160900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 311.40 488189 0069160900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17.83 488191 0069161000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,213.15 488191 0069161000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.63 488187 69166900 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 804.95 488187 69166900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,605.16 7981 4/18/2019 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 34.55 PAPER 488462 148603 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 34.55 7982 4/18/2019 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 143.61 488049 WO-458544-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 182.35 SUPPLIES 488442 WO-459190-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.78 SUPPLIES 488443 WO-459244-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 383.74 7983 4/18/2019 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 26,315.21 CITY ATTORNEY-JAN 2019 488173 2851G-1/19 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 14,905.37 CITY ATTORNEY-FEB 2019 488174 2851G-2/19 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 18,267.47 CITY ATTORNEY-MARCH 2019 488175 2851G-3/19 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 59,488.05 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7983 4/18/2019 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Continued... 7984 4/18/2019 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 847.83 488213 2081374 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 110.75-487826 483678 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,279.00 488215 50551375 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,463.00 488214 64721373 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,479.08 7985 4/18/2019 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 1,214.00 CUSTODIAL SERVICES APRIL 488157 7070262443 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,214.00 7986 4/18/2019 104020 DALCO 20,505.10 FLOOR SCRUBBERS 488216 3436325 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 20,505.10 7987 4/18/2019 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 471.08 EDITION: EDINA 488139 684457 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 471.06 EDITION: EDINA - APRIL 488138 684458 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 942.14 7988 4/18/2019 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 1,240.00 VFD FOR RETURN PD FAN 488129 9833 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 399.06 HEAT WHEEL REPAIR PART 488128 9851 7412.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF RANGE 1,639.06 7989 4/18/2019 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 75.27 PIPE SUPPLIES 488222 INV105608 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 35.40 REPAIR PARTS 488451 INV107215 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 110.67 7990 4/18/2019 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 260.00 MONTHLY SPRINKLER INSPECTION 488130 307766 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 260.00 7991 4/18/2019 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 58.91 STROBE LIGHTS 488131 IN104312 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.91 7992 4/18/2019 100858 LOGIS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7992 4/18/2019 100858 LOGIS Continued... 156.25 IT CONSULTING 488136 46815 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 IT CONSULTING 488136 46815 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 718.75 IT CONSULTING 488136 46815 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 250.00 IT CONSULTING 488136 46815 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 187.50 IT CONSULTING 488136 46815 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 50.00 ADMIN FEE 488137 46922 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 184.95 EDINAPARKS.COM 488137 46922 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 240.61 OSMCT CERTIFICATE 488137 46922 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 404.85 IT CONSULTING 488137 46922 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 665.82 COMEHOME2EDINA.COM 488137 46922 1140.4385 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT PLANNING 665.82 BRAEMARGOLF.COM 9YRS 488137 46922 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 194.95 ADVENTURE-PEAK.COM 488137 46922 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 3,969.50 7993 4/18/2019 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER 250.00 LT. PROMOTION 488108 12306 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 7994 4/18/2019 101483 MENARDS 76.02 TREATMENT PLANT OFFICE SUPPLIE 488112 89718 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 19.43 FIRE SIGN 488111 89911 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 297.49 CEDAR LUMBER (MAILBOX)488110 89924 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 3.27 FOREEL BATTERY 488114 89933 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 49.96 FLAT CART WHEELS 488114 89933 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 24.26 ZAM FIBERGLASS 488113 90022 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 57.76 GENERAL SUPPLIES 488113 90022 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 18.99 ROPE 488465 90050 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 344.37 COUNTER TOPS 488419 90058 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 891.55 7995 4/18/2019 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 231.15 LAPPING COMPOUND 488094 1203577-01 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 210.84 PARTS FOR MOWERS 488118 1203816-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 30.91 PARTS FOR MOWERS 488119 1203926-01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 62.20 PARTS FOR MOWERS 488120 1204005-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 56.53 TOOL FOR BEDKNIFE SCREWS 488121 1204129-00 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 23.23 PARTS FOR MOWERS 488122 1204196-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.07 PART FOR MOWER 488093 1204196-01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,147.80 HAZARDS STAKES/SETUP SUPPLIES 488096 1204616-00 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 470.83 OB STAKES 488097 1204616-01 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7995 4/18/2019 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.Continued... 1,631.12 MOWER PARTS 488095 1204966-00 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 5,904.68 7996 4/18/2019 129485 PAPCO INC. 72.53 CLEANING SUPPLIES 488107 210991-1 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 72.53 7997 4/18/2019 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 108.31 PARTS FOR TORNADO VACUUM 488087 15599 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 78.50 488515 15601 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 110.05 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 488085 15613 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 12.23 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 488085 15613 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 442.16 PAPER TOWELS, TISSUE, PURELL 488086 15615 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 444.97 LINERS, FOAMY CLEANER, GLOVES 488086 15615 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,196.22 7998 4/18/2019 101015 STREICHERS 395.40 SWAT ROUNDS 488171 I1361445 1401.6551 AMMUNITION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 395.40 7999 4/18/2019 119454 VINOCOPIA 1.50 488239 0230478-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 32.00 488239 0230478-IN 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.50 488266 0230479-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 32.00 488266 0230479-IN 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.50 488237 0230480-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,397.50 488237 0230480-IN 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.50 488238 230477 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,230.50 488238 230477 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,714.00 8000 4/18/2019 103219 WENDEL SGN ARCHITECTURE INC. 811.10 488422 351250 47106.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Arden Park Shelter and Imp 811.10 8001 4/18/2019 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 8.40 488241 102886 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.00 488241 102886 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.25 488242 102888 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 440.00 488242 102888 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8001 4/18/2019 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 8.25 488350 102973 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 840.00 488350 102973 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,624.90 8002 4/18/2019 101091 ZIEGLER INC 140.25 CONTRACTED REPAIR 488457 SW100206345 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.25 8003 4/25/2019 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 301.53 SOUTH RAMP TRASH DOORS 488690 21904111 4090.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 301.53 8004 4/25/2019 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 2,031.85 JOYSTICK COVER, ASSY 489159 0159532-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,031.85 8005 4/25/2019 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 2.00 488617 2353658 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 50.60 488617 2353658 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 180.44 488941 2355385 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.00 488839 23555387 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 79.82 488839 23555387 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 314.86 8006 4/25/2019 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 291.16 FIRE EXTINGUISHER ANNUAL SERVI 488657 169638 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 373.02 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 489143 169892 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 664.18 8007 4/25/2019 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 479.35 COFFEE - FIRE 488820 1363348 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 479.35 8008 4/25/2019 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1.55 488742 0069234600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 122.00 488742 0069234600 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .78 488740 0069270800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 71.50 488740 0069270800 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.18 488739 0069279600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 752.60 488739 0069279600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8008 4/25/2019 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION Continued... 7.75 488741 006981200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 673.00 488741 006981200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.36 488738 0099353300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 351.90 488738 0099353300 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.55 488737 69234700 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 128.00 488737 69234700 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .78 488830 69270700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 71.50 488830 69270700 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.85 488938 69280700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,173.60 488938 69280700 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.30 488831 69281400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 731.55 488831 69281400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.75 488829 99352700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 161.86 488829 99352700 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.74 488937 99352800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 157.29 488937 99352800 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.30-489023 99361700 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,447.09 8009 4/25/2019 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 105.75 KEYS 488986 SH99284 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 105.75 8010 4/25/2019 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 174.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 488582 148644 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 142.04 PRINTER CARTRIDGE 488715 148742 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 39.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 488885 148870 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 356.49 8011 4/25/2019 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 115.84 PIGTAIL 488783 852977 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.84 8012 4/25/2019 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 53.60 488603 0WO-458400-1 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.45 SUPPLIES 488926 WO-457659-2 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PLANNING 489181 WO-461329-1 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 168.12 8013 4/25/2019 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8013 4/25/2019 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD Continued... 25.95 65% XCEL BILL 488675 7288 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 25.95 8014 4/25/2019 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 647.17 65% XCEL BILL 488676 7287 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 647.17 8015 4/25/2019 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 94.50 2019 BOAE NOTICE 488881 685458 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 160.65 ORD 2019-15 488883 685460 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 226.10 ORD 2019-07 488882 923666 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 142.80 VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 488884 923837 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 624.05 8016 4/25/2019 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 188.07 LINCOLN DR TRAIL IMP 488878 744228882 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 188.07 8017 4/25/2019 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 1,483.08 PLUMBING REPAIR 488714 15404 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,483.08 8018 4/25/2019 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 45.00 PD GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 488642 0003398-IN 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 265.35 PD SALLY PORT DOOR REPAIR 488692 0004334-IN 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 310.35 8019 4/25/2019 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 655.00 VFD MAINT.489115 9756 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 655.00 8020 4/25/2019 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 74.56 REPAIR PARTS 488823 INV108219 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 74.56 8021 4/25/2019 101483 MENARDS 39.99 488596 89910 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 65.13 MAILBOX MATERIAL 489163 90432 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 98.14 SKATE SHOW CABLE 488984 90478 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 574.00 DOME LUMBER 488984 90478 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8021 4/25/2019 101483 MENARDS Continued... 19.14 4"X4"X8' GREEN TREATED 488824 90524 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 24.90 AIR DUSTER 488861 90555 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 46.28 SKATE SHOW CABLE 488861 90555 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 79.50 488947 90585 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 21.87 SKATE SHOW CABLE 488987 90586 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 968.95 8022 4/25/2019 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 37.90 488699 41660 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 269.01 488699 41660 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 507.08 488699 41660 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 813.99 8023 4/25/2019 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 151.65 BACKLAPPING COMPOUND FOR REELS 488660 1204511-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 750.00 MOWER 488988 1204960-00 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 597.01 REPAIRS TO GREENS MOWER 488985 1204987-00 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 48.95 PARTS FOR ROUGH MOWER 488659 1206254-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 327.20 TINES FOR AERIFIER 488658 1206733-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,874.81 8024 4/25/2019 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 190.00 ALUMINUM 489132 432324 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.00 8025 4/25/2019 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 198.80 SKATE SHOW ICE PAINT 488863 0067650-IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 198.80 8026 4/25/2019 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 6,277.25 PLUMBING REPAIR 488812 76357 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6,277.25 8027 4/25/2019 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 122.93 PW ENVELOPES 488684 104207 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 122.93 8028 4/25/2019 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 2,062.50 SCADA PROGRAMMING 488887 2142 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,062.50 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8028 4/25/2019 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING Continued... 8029 4/25/2019 101015 STREICHERS 972.66 DUTY AMMO 488819 I1362417 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,785.40 PRACTICE AMMO 488818 I1362423 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.99 UNIFORM EQUIPMENT 488645 I1362602 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.99 UNIFORM EQUIPMENT 488646 I1362607 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5,782.04 8030 4/25/2019 135312 SUSSMAN, MIKE 85.46 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 488644 04172019MS 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.46 8031 4/25/2019 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 5,123.91 488890 2019000033 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5,123.91 8032 4/25/2019 119454 VINOCOPIA 21.00 488954 0230956 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,425.34 488954 0230956 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.50 488769 230955 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 208.00 488769 230955 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,656.84 8033 4/25/2019 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 946.46 CONCESSIONS FOOD 488957 54797939 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 946.46 8034 4/25/2019 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 9.90 488768 103553 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 772.00 488768 103553 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.50 488959 103554 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,158.40 488959 103554 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.20 488736 5800-1353 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 369.00 488736 5800-1353 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,329.00 8035 5/2/2019 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 2.00 489480 2359207 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 135.51 489480 2359207 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 137.51 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8035 5/2/2019 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY Continued... 8036 5/2/2019 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 89.04 NEW EXTINGUISHER ELEV. SHAFT 489236 169765 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 89.04 8037 5/2/2019 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 7,170.00 489334 23271649.01 - 3 04438.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Flood Risk Reduction Strategy 1,317.00 RFQ VEG BMPS DEV 489514 23271705.00 - 1 04447.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Stormwater BMP Maintenance 8,487.00 8038 5/2/2019 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 23.25 489482 0069387700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,341.96 489482 0069387700 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.85 489351 69388200 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 860.00 489351 69388200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,236.06 8039 5/2/2019 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 5,312.50 GEOTECH PARKLAWN 489276 B166633 1640.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 5,312.50 8040 5/2/2019 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 143.48 SUPPLY ROOM 489244 WO-461287-1 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 62.75 SUPPLIES 489583 WO-462601-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 206.23 8041 5/2/2019 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC 165.00 TOW VEHICLE 489335 641281 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 165.00 8042 5/2/2019 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 1,033.00 489487 71421482 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 917.32 489358 93510068 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,950.32 8043 5/2/2019 104020 DALCO 471.17 CLEANING SUPPLIES VV 489253 3441361 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.18 CLEANING SUPPLIES 489297 3441842 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 192.78 PW SUPPLIES 489511 3443159 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.84 PW SUPPLIES 489512 3444313 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8043 5/2/2019 104020 DALCO Continued... 797.97 8044 5/2/2019 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 812.80 CONCESSIONS FOOD 489527 2522 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 812.80 8045 5/2/2019 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 41.65 MINI STORAGE SITE PLAN 489406 687290 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 583.10 PENTAGON VILLAGE PH 489407 687291 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 47.60 STS POLLUTION PLAN 489408 687292 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 154.70 LINCOLN DR PH 489409 687293 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 827.05 8046 5/2/2019 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 335.00 GIFT CERTIF. LESSONS 489307 425 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 335.00 8047 5/2/2019 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 205.02 VALLEY VIEW ROAD SIDEWALK 489274 11726793 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 205.02 8048 5/2/2019 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 604.97 EAST COMPRESSOR SELINOID 489267 W10816 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 604.97 8049 5/2/2019 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 1,619.52 FIELD PAINT 489291 0000518-IN 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,619.52 8050 5/2/2019 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 212.40 RETURN 489553 CM0006989 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 287.02 REPAIR PARTS 489556 INV110608 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 499.42 8051 5/2/2019 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 673.80 PPE - SCHMITZ ALTERATIONS OF 489281 IN104706 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 673.80 8052 5/2/2019 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 660.50 489548 4616 05582.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Indian Trails B/C 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8052 5/2/2019 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES Continued... 322.50 489549 4622 05582.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Indian Trails B/C 983.00 8053 5/2/2019 103944 MED COMPASS 9,085.00 ANNUAL MEDICAL EXAMS 489558 35443 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9,085.00 8054 5/2/2019 101483 MENARDS 99.99 LADDER FOR ZIP LINE 489239 90370 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 59.70 INTERIOR LIGHT POST BULBS 489235 90378 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 81.28 COUNTER TOP CAULKING/ BRACKETS 489241 90382 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 197.62 NEW SHINGLES FOR WELL HOUSE 489317 90386 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 159.83 SUPPLIES 489426 90673 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 83.30 RAKES 489277 90853 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 120.24 TOOLS 489427 90904 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 85.54 TAKEDOWN SUPPLIES 489340 90910 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 22.84 SKATE SHOW CABLE 489341 90947 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 160.27 LUMBER 489570 90979 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.54 SPRAY PAINT/HARDWARE 489443 91053 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 29.99 4X8 PLYWOOD 489542 91064 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 20.32 ST. 2 GUTTER REPAIRS 489543 91129 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 192.15 TAKEDOWN SUPPLIES 489524 91130 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 15.25 TAKEDOWN SUPPLIES 489525 91194 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,375.86 8055 5/2/2019 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 189.25 489509 41663 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 438.50 489509 41663 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 627.75 8056 5/2/2019 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 43,024.70 TORO TRIFLEX 3320 489540 1203867-00 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,423.93 HEAVY DUTY PUSH MOWERS 489541 1204936-00 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,941.78-CREDIT ON OB STAKES 489321 1207291-00 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 150.73-CREDIT ON LAPPING COMPOUND 489299 1207501-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 43,356.12 8057 5/2/2019 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 194.41 PIPE 489433 432859 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.41 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8057 5/2/2019 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY Continued... 8058 5/2/2019 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 559.10 SADDLES, TIES, TENSION RODS 489445 3000 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 559.10 8059 5/2/2019 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 79.50 TIRES 489322 210405741 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 919.00 TIRES 489603 210407152 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 346.00 TIRES AND SERVICE 489602 210407817 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,344.50 8060 5/2/2019 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 366.87 TISSUE, PAPER TOWELS, PURELL 489449 15652 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 720.96 GLOVES, FOAMY CLEANER 489449 15652 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,087.83 8061 5/2/2019 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 109.87 BUSINESS CARD DESIGN 489246 104150 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 88.92 BUS CARDS 489451 104336 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 198.79 8062 5/2/2019 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 202.00 DAMPER 489258 12259103 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 202.00 DAMPER 489538 12259103DUP 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.00 ROCKER SWITCH 489259 12259105 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.00-CREDIT MEMO 489260 12259118 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 404.00 8063 5/2/2019 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 7,689.66 MASTER PLAN CONTINGENCY 489318 EE04725 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 19,090.44 MASTER PLAN CONTINGENCY 489292 EE04726 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 26,780.10 8064 5/2/2019 119454 VINOCOPIA 3.75 489383 231383 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 640.00 489383 231383 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.50 489503 231393 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 540.50 489503 231393 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 31.25 489504 231394 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,152.67 489504 231394 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5/2/2019CITY OF EDINA 10:06:20R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 8064 5/2/2019 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued... 12.50 489382 231395 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 960.00 489382 231395 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,348.17 8065 5/2/2019 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 7.04-APPLE SAUCE RETURN 489338 54816683 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 444.44 CONCESSIONS FOOD 489521 54861105 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 437.40 8066 5/2/2019 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 14.85 489384 104255 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,141.33 489384 104255 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.10 489192 104258 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,822.40 489192 104258 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,001.68 272,178.72 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 272,178.72A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 272,178.72 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Encroachment Agreement at 6650 Parkwood Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Encroachment Agreement at 6650 Parkwood Road. INTRODUCTION: This encroachment has existed since at least 1975 (as shown in the aerials). At that time, the now owned city parcel was owned by the Parkwood Knolls Construction company. There is no knowledge of the previous owner knowing about the encroachment. In 2009, as part of the P arkwood Knolls 27th Addition sub-division, the City was quit claimed the parcel, PID 3011721340017. T his area is a stormwater pond. The tennis court encroachment was clear and in plain sight at this time. T he City did not object to the encroachment at the time of the quit claim. ATTACHMENTS: Description Encroachment Agreement Survey Graphic US.122592167.01 ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT THIS ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is made as of the ____ day of April, 2019, between THE CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation (the “City”), and ROBERT W. REBISCHKE and JOANNA L. ROHLFSEN, a married couple (the “Rebischke-Rohlfsens”). A. The Rebischke-Rohlfsens own real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 6, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 14th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property”). B. The City owns certain real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Outlot 1, Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City Property”). C. The City Property is adjacent to the Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property. D. The Rebischke-Rohlfsens (or their predecessors in interest) constructed and maintain a tennis court and related facilities on the Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property. A portion of the tennis court and related facilities encroach onto the City Property, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Encroachment”). E. The parties hereto desire to resolve the matter of the Encroachment. US.122592167.01 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 2. The Rebischke-Rohlfsens and the City acknowledge that a portion of the tennis court and related facilities constructed on the Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property encroach upon the City Property. 3. Pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the City hereby consents to the use and maintenance of the Encroachment by the Rebischke-Rohlfsens, as well as access from the Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property onto the City Property to maintain the Encroachment. 4. The Rebischke-Rohlfsens hereby waive any claim that the Encroachment has ripened into fee ownership over a portion of the City Property. 5. The Rebischke-Rohlfsens agree not to extend the Encroachment onto additional portions of the City Property. The Rebischke-Rohlfsens and their successors in title may continue to maintain the Encroachment for so long as the tennis court and related facilities are maintained on the Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property. 6. If the tennis court and related facilities are demolished, the Rebischke- Rohlfsens agree not to construct a new tennis court and related facilities that encroach onto the City Property. 7. This Agreement is not intended to amend or terminate any existing easement rights encumbering the City Property and running in favor of the Rebischke-Rohlfsens Property. 8. This Agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 9. This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. [Signature Pages to Follow] US.122592167.01 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed as of the day and year first above written. Robert W. Rebischke Joanna L. Rohlfsen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of April, 2019, by Robert W. Rebischke and Joanna L. Rohlfsen, as husband and wife. _________________________________ Notary Public US.122592167.01 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA: BY: _________________, Mayor AND ____________, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of April, 2019, by _________________ and by ________________, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Faegre Baker Daniels LLP (PLM) 2200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: (612) 766-7000 US.122592167.01 EXHIBIT A (Building Encroachment Easement Area) US.122592167.01 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement with Orion 4500 France, LLC Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement with Orion 4500 France, LLC and authorize staff to implement the amended terms of the Agreement. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the redevelopment of properties located primarily at 4500 France Avenue - the former Edina Cleaners site. The Developer has requested that the terms of payment for the future TIF Note be clarified. This TIF Note is anticipated to be issued after completion of the project with annual payments sized on the actual annual returns to the Developer. This clarification pertains to the payments of the T IF Note if the project is sold to an unrelated party. The HRA's legal counsel has prepared the proposed Amendment to provide clarification without changing the intention of the original Agreement. The HRA's financial advisor also helped craft the Amendment. The Developer is agreeable to the clarified wording. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approved the Amendment at their April 25, 2019 meeting. Staff recommends that the Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement be approved. ATTACHMENTS: Description 4500 France - TIF Amendment #1 1 4831-0104-1300\5 FIRST AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (4500 France) THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of _____________, 2019, by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”) and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”) (the City, the Authority, and Developer, collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”). RECITALS A. The City, the Authority and Developer are parties to a Redevelopment Agreement dated December 18, 2018 (the “Original Agreement”, and such Original Agreement as modified by this Amendment, collectively, the “Agreement”). B. The Parties have agreed to amend the Redevelopment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual obligations of the Parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Recitals; Definitions. The foregoing recitals are true and accurate and are incorporated herein as part of the agreement of the Parties. Any word or term with an initial capital letter shall have the meaning given to it in this Amendment or if not so defined herein shall have the meaning given to it in the Original Agreement. 2. Defined Terms. The following capitalized terms are hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement, and such terms shall have the meanings set forth below for all purposes under the Agreement: (a) “Commercial Element” means the element(s) of the Minimum Improvements consisting of commercial space, together with all shared elements, common elements, rights, and/or privileges appurtenant to such commercial space. (b) “Element” or “Elements” means the Residential Element and/or the Commercial Element, as the context requires. (c) “Residential Element” means the element(s) of the Minimum Improvements consisting of residential units, together with all shared elements, common elements, rights, and/or privileges appurtenant to such residential units. 3. Sale Lookback. Section 7.3(c) of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: “(c) Sale Lookback. 2 4831-0104-1300\5 (i) No later than 30 days after a sale of all of the Minimum Improvements a (“Full Sale”) or after a partial sale of the Minimum Improvements involving either just the Residential Element or just the Commercial Element (in either case, a “Partial Sale”), to any party other than a Related Party occurring prior to the date upon which the TIF Note is paid in full or terminated hereunder, Developer shall submit to the Authority and its Financial Advisor any reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority and its Financial Advisor require in order to calculate the IRR for such sale, including, without limitation, a certified cost and revenue analysis for such sale prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which requirements will be satisfied if substantially in the same form as an updated TIF Pro Forma (“Sale Pro Forma”). This analysis will include, without limitation, all acquisition costs, Qualified Redevelopment Costs, and all other improvement and redevelopment costs incurred by Developer for the Minimum Improvements, as well as historical Net Operating Income, debt service, and TIF Note payments. In the event of a Partial Sale, such costs (“Element Cost Allocation”) and such income (“Element Income Allocation”) shall be reasonably allocated between the Elements. Following the construction of the Minimum Improvements and prior to the issuance of the TIF Note, Developer shall propose to the Authority an Element Cost Allocation and Element Income Allocation based on the actual cost of the Minimum Improvements and an updated TIF Pro Forma. Developer shall provide to the Authority such additional information as is reasonably necessary to substantiate such proposed allocations, and upon the Authority’s approval of such allocations, which such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, the parties will enter into an amendment to this Agreement to establish the Element Cost Allocation and the Element Income Allocation. The Authority may retain an accountant to audit the submitted Sale Pro Forma, at Developer’s cost. Developer shall pay to the Authority an amount equal to Developer’s proceeds of such sale which causes Developer’s IRR for such sale of the Minimum Improvements, or a part thereof, to exceed an IRR of 16.0% (the “Project Excess Return”). For purposes of clarity, in the event of a Partial Sale, the Project Excess Return for such Partial Sale shall be calculated using the Element Cost Allocation and Element Income Allocation for the Element which is the subject of such Partial Sale. (ii) Developer shall pay the Project Excess Return to the Authority first, by a reduction of the outstanding principal amount of the TIF Note in the amount of up to 100% of the Project Excess Return. In the event of any sale of the Minimum Improvements (partial or full) in which the Project Excess Return exceeds the outstanding principal balance of the TIF Note, Developer shall pay such excess (the “Project TIF Adjustment”) in lawful money of the United States within 30 days from the date on which the Authority gives Developer notice of the amount of the Project TIF Adjustment due to the Authority; provided, however, in no event shall the 3 4831-0104-1300\5 Project TIF Adjustment exceed the aggregate sum of all payments (both principal and interest) actually made by the Authority to Developer under the TIF Note. Until the Authority is paid the Project TIF Adjustment in full, the Authority shall have a lien in its favor upon the Minimum Improvements to secure the amount of the Project TIF Adjustment. Such lien shall attach and take effect from the date of the sale of the Minimum Improvements contemplated by this section. Any such lien may be foreclosed as a mortgage on real estate if the Project TIF Adjustment is not paid by the date required by this section. A lien under this section is prior to all other liens and encumbrances on the Minimum Improvements except (1) the first priority Mortgage on the Minimum Improvement Area; (2) liens for real estate taxes and other governmental assessments or charges against the Minimum Improvements; and (3) all leases executed prior to the date that the lien attaches and takes effect. (iii) In connection with any Partial Sale, the TIF Note, as may be adjusted pursuant to clause (ii) above, shall be retained by Developer and, thereafter, Developer shall be entitled to continued payments under the TIF Note from Available Tax Increment generated from the entire Minimum Improvements Area, subject to the terms and conditions of Section 7.3(b), as the same are applicable to only the Element retained by Developer (i.e., the Cash-on-Cost Return and related calculations will be based on only the Residential Element or the Commercial Element, as the case may be, not the Minimum Improvements as a whole, using the allocation set forth in subsection (ii)). (iv) In connection with any Full Sale (either a complete sale of the Minimum Improvements in a single event or the sale of the second Element, if the Developer retained ownership of an Element following the sale of the first Element), the TIF Note may be assigned to the transferee under such Full Sale, provided such transferee assumes all of the obligations of Developer under this Agreement in writing, specifically including the terms and conditions of Section 7.3(b). If, following any adjustment pursuant to clause (ii) above in connection with a Full Sale, there remains a principal balance under the TIF Note, the transferee of the TIF Note shall be entitled to continued payments thereunder subject to the terms and conditions of Section 7.3(b) as the same are applicable to only the Element(s) owned by the holder of the TIF Note. (v) If, following any adjustment pursuant to clause (ii) above in connection with a Full Sale or Partial Sale, the principal balance of the TIF Note has been reduced to zero, then the Authority’s obligations to make payments thereunder shall terminate, and upon payment of any applicable Project TIF Adjustment, the obligations under Section 7.3(b) and this Section 7.3(c) shall terminate. 4 4831-0104-1300\5 (vi) For purposes of clarity, example calculations of the Project TIF Adjustment pursuant to this Section 7.3(c) is attached hereto as Exhibit K. (vii) The annual lookback in Section 7.3(b) and the sale lookback in Section 7.3(c) shall only apply to Developer or its successor and assign who owns one or both of the Elements and holds the TIF Note.” 4. Ownership of the TIF Note. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, Developer or its successor and assign who owns one or both of the Elements, shall at all times be the holder of the TIF Note, subject to any collateral assignment of the TIF Note pursuant to Section 8.4(a) of the Original Agreement. 5. Ratification. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 6. Binding Effect. This Amendment amends and supplements the Agreement. If there is a conflict between the provisions of the Original Agreement and this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the City, the Authority, Developer, and their respective successors and assigns. 7. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile or email copies shall be deemed originals. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] [Signature Page to First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (4500 France)] 4831-0104-1300\5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and Developer have caused this Amendment to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: _____________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: _____________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2019, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. Notary Public [Signature Page to First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (Orion 4500 France)] HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ Michael Fischer, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2019, by James B. Hovland and Michael Fischer, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. Notary Public [Signature Page to First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (4500 France)] 4831-0104-1300\5 ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC a Delaware limited liability company By: Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Manager By: ____________________________________ Name: __________________________________ Its: ____________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _______________, 2019, by __________________, the _______________________ of Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as the manager of ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services. INTRODUCTION: See attached Request for P urchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assess. Letter Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: May 7, 2019 To: Mayor and City Council From: Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Subject: Request for Purchase: Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☒Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Background Since September of 2014, it has been advantageous to assess water main pipe conditions in project areas of future street reconstruction. The non-invasive water main testing provides us with more data about the condition of our water main system similar to closed circuit televising does for sanitary sewer trunk pipes. This data, plus water main break data proves to be a powerful tool in determining where to spend our water main funds to get the greatest value to our water main system. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: April 12, 2019 June 12, 2019 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. $135,000.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. $135,000.00 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This proposal includes assessment of approximately 26,244 linear feet of water main in portions of our anticipated 2020, 2021, and 2022 street reconstruction project areas and a highway crossing at Highway 62 & Gleason Road. This is 15.6% more footage than last year. This will be funded by the water utility fund. Environmental Impact The watermain condition data allows us to only replace the pipes that need it with this infrastructure replacement cycle. By getting the most life out of the existing watermain pipes, we are reducing the need for new resources where they are not needed. This lowers our potential carbon footprint and uses only the necessary resources to provide the level of service required. Community Impact The watermain utility is able to provide better service to the community by only replacing the watermain pipes that need it. This leads to less service interruptions. Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT April 12, 2019 RE: City of Edina, Minnesota 2019 Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Project SEH No. EDINA 150415 10.03 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: Thank you for expressing interest in SEH’s professional services to non-invasively assess the condition of the City of Edina’s (City’s) water main pipes (pipes). SEH teams with Echologics, a division of Mueller Company, to use their Echo Shore tool (tool) to complete the City’s assessment. We will provide these services in accordance with the City of Edina’s Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 14, 2013 with SEH, herein called the Agreement. SUMMARY The City wants to assess the condition of 26,244 linear feet of pipe for 2019 in various streets and neighborhoods as shown in Exhibit 1. The total footage consists of five separate area as follows: 1. Melody Lake/Birchcrest 2. Creek Knoll 3. Blake Road 4. Prospect Knolls 5. Highway 62 crossings at Gleason Road and Vernon Hills Road/Post Lane This includes 26,244 of pipe less than 16-inch diameter. During this trip to Minnesota, the tool will assess the condition of pipes in other Minnesota cities. Working in more than one city per trip allows us to spread the tool’s mobilization cost among multiple cities. This reduces the cost that any one city will pay for an assessment of its pipes. BENEFITS Choosing to apply this tool to the City’s pipes provides the following immediate benefits: Mr. Chad Millner, PE April 12, 2019 Page 2 1. Reduce the amount of money the City spends to create potable water. 2. Reduce the amount of electricity the City uses to distribute potable water. 3. Reduce the cost the City might spend to excavate and restore the area around a leak by catching the leak in its earliest stages. 4. Allow the City to better coordinate pipe rehabilitation with capital improvement plans for other infrastructure occupying the right-of-way or easement. 5. Allow the City to better understand how much of its pipe network may need rehabilitation. 6. Provide information to MnDOT and Dakota County regarding the condition of your pipe crossings under major highway corridors to avoid catastrophic transportation impacts should there be a watermain failure in these corridors. DELIVERABLES Below is a list of deliverables we will provide to the City at the conclusion of the assessment. We will submit a draft report to the City within 6 weeks of completing field work. At this time the exact schedule for the field work has not been determined, but it is anticipated to be this spring. It largely depends on: a) the schedule of the field crews and b) the number and schedules of all other cities participating in the program. As soon as Echologics has a final schedule for our 2019 Minnesota PCA program, we will inform you of a more exact start date. 1. An update to the City’s Geographic Information System (GIS) for each reach of pipe. We define a reach of pipe as between fire hydrants or main line valves. The update will add the following attributes via shape file or geodatabase to the City’s GIS: a. An estimate how much pipe wall has been lost to date. b. An estimate of the pipe’s corrosion rate. c. An estimate of the pipe’s remaining wall thickness. 2. A written report summarizing the results of the condition assessment and leak detection containing the following information: a. Introduction. b. A discussion of the purpose of leak detection and condition assessment. c. A discussion of the background of leak detection and condition assessment. d. A discussion of the methodology of leak detection and condition assessment. e. A description of the instrumentation used to complete the work. f. Tabulation of condition assessment results. g. Description of deficiencies the crew found in the field along the pipe network. h. An appendix showing the measured results for each reach of pipe. i. An appendix containing a summary tabulation of condition assessment ranked from worst to best. ESTIMATED COSTS We will complete our work for an estimated fee of $135,000. This cost includes reimbursable expenses, mobilization, and the final report. This fee does not include the service life analysis option. We will invoice the City for our work on a lump sum basis plus expenses. Mr. Chad Millner, PE April 12, 2019 Page 3 Exhibit 2 enclosed with this letter is Echologics Technical Requirements, Specifications, and Constraints. Exhibit 2 outlines the work we assume will be undertaken by City forces at their own expense. Asking us to accomplish work in Exhibit 2 will cause an additional expense. Please note that we cannot guarantee that the other Minnesota cities will proceed with their projects. If they choose not to proceed, it is understood that the City may elect to reconsider proceeding with the project depending on any potential increase in the mobilization costs. This Supplemental Letter Agreement and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. As always, we look forward to serving the City and applying our expertise assessing the condition of the City’s water main pipes. Please contact me with questions and comments at 612.255.8747 or dhutton@sehinc.com. Respectfully submitted, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Toby Muse PE David E. Hutton, PE Associate, Client Service Manager Project Manager (Lic. MN) (Lic. MN, WI, ND) Accepted this ____ day of _____________, 2019 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ____________________________________ Name Title: ___________________________________ Enclosure c: Michael Livermore, Echologics p:\ae\e\edina\150415\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\2019 04 12 edina letter proposal.docx Project: 2019 Watermain PCA Client: City of EdinaProject #: 150415Date: 4/12/2019P:\AE\E\Edina\150415\1‐genl\10‐setup‐cont\03‐proposal\[PCA Fee Estimate 2019_Edina.xlsx]Echo Fee EstimateCity of Edina Project Area NameQty of Pipe < 16" diameterQty of Pipe > 16" diameterCost for Pipe < 16" diameterCost for Pipe > 16" diameterTotal Cost Field WorkTotal Cost Admin & ReportingTotalMelody Lake/Birchcrest 10,088 41,391.06$ ‐$ 41,391.06$ 6,958.53$ 48,349.59$ Creek Knoll 2,871 11,779.71$ ‐$ 11,779.71$ 1,980.37$ 13,760.08$ Blake Road 4,014 16,469.44$ ‐$ 16,469.44$ 2,768.79$ 19,238.23$ Prospect Knolls 7,509 30,809.43$ ‐$ 30,809.43$ 5,179.58$ 35,989.01$ TH 62 Crossings 1,762 7,229.49$ ‐$ 7,229.49$ 1,215.40$ 8,444.88$ Mobilization + Reporting9,350.00$ Subotal26,244 ‐ Total135,131.80$ 26,244 7. Technical Requirements, Specifications, and Constraints 7.1. Operational Requirements 7.1.1. Owner shall supply an experienced crew for operation of all Owner owned apparatus. The size of the crew depends on the details of the job. Echologics is not responsible for any operation or modification of Owner owned apparatus. 7.1.2. All fittings must be cleaned, exercised and in safe working condition prior to survey. Closed valves or other appurtenances must not be passing water. Hydrants must not be leaking. If cleaning cannot be performed prior to site- work, on site cleaning must be arranged by Client on request. 7.1.3. Client shall provide traffic management (including man power and equipment) as and when required. Echologics is not responsible for any traffic control requirements, unless explicitly included in this proposal. It is expected that the client will be proficient in all local laws and regulations. 7.1.4. If indicated as a requirement during the Project Planning phase, Echologics shall supply one crew member trained as a confined space entrant. All other aspects of confined space entry shall be of the responsibility of Client, unless explicitly included in this proposal. 7.1.5. Fall protection, including supply of fall prevention equipment and harnesses, shall be of the responsibility of Client. 7.1.6. Echologics shall follow any Lock out Tag and Tag out procedures specified by Client. Client is responsible for informing Echologics of any such procedures in effect at the work sites applicable for this project. 7.1.7. All required information regarding the pipes to be tested must be provided in advance to Echologics. The information must be up to date and in a form that can be easily interpreted. This includes as-built drawings, repair history, nominal pipe information, GIS information, pressure and flow information, locations of PRVs, pumps, reservoirs, cross-connections, reducers, tie-ins, valves, services, backflow preventers, hydrants, corp valves, and any other possible noise producing apparatus. 7.1.8. If De-chlorination / Chlorination and/or backflow preventers are required, these shall be the responsibility of Client. 7.2. General Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.2.1. Fluid temperature must be between 33º and 100º F (0.5º and 38º C) 7.2.2. Liquid flow velocities above 5 ft/s (1.5 m/s) may result in turbulence in the line, introducing noise which can reduce the sensitivity of leak detection, and prevent collection of pipe integrity testing data. Echologics recommends that Client take steps to ensure velocities are below these levels, but will conduct testing nonetheless if Client elects to leave them at higher levels. 7.2.3. Operating pressure must be between 15 and 150psi (100 to 1000 kpa). Pressures outside of this range will require special consideration. 7.2.4. Large air pockets cannot be present in the pipe. Purging of all air may be required. 7.2.5. Significant amounts of dispersed air (milky water) can skew results. Purging of dispersed air may be required. 7.2.6. All forms of non-destructive testing involve an inherent and unavoidable level of uncertainty. The results provided by Echologics are not guaranteed. The methods used for leak detection and condition assessment are highly dependent on input parameters therefore it is not possible to certify the results. Echologics is not responsible any actions taken or recommendations made by Client based on the results of the report. 7.3. Leak Detection Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.3.1. Acceptable pipe materials are: Pit Cast Iron, Spun Cast Iron, Steel, Ductile Iron, Asbestos Cement, Reinforced or Bar-wrapped Concrete, PVC, PE and other Plastics 7.3.2. Surface mounted sensors can be magnetically attached to appurtenances such as line valves, hydrant secondary valves or to the top of the pipe at a maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing of 1000ft (300m) 7.3.3. Longer sensor-to-sensor spacing will require the use of hydrophones 7.3.3.1. Suitable access is required to attach or adapt a 1.5” NPT female fitting to a valved fitting such as a corp valves, air blow offs, fire hydrants or tapped blind flanges. 7.3.3.2. The maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing for Hydrophone sensors is 2500ft (750m) 7.3.4. Vertical access is required to lower the sensor down from the surface. Angled or broken valve chamber are not suitable. 7.3.5. The connection point must be free of dirt and debris and in good working order 7.3.6. Performance specifications are based on a sensor spacing of 330ft (100m) 7.3.7. Performance specifications assume that accurate information has been provided regarding and pipe location including locations of bends and elevation changes. 7.3.8. Performance specifications assume that accurate information regarding pipe type (material) and diameter has been provided. 7.3.9. Diameters may range from 1” to 120” (25mm to 3050mm) in diameter. Larger mains are possible but special consideration must be taken. 7.3.10. Leaks location accuracies depend on sensor spacing, pipe material consistency, and other factors, but are generally within 10 ft (3 m) of its actual position when accurate information for pipe type and diameter is provided. 7.3.11. Sensitivity to small leaks varies depending on pipe diameter and material, as well as sensor spacing and the presence of noise inside the pipe. Leaks as small as 2.5 GPM (9.5 l/m) can consistently be located, and leaks as small as 0.5 GPM (2 l/m) can be located under good conditions. 7.4. Condition Assessment Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.4.1. Acceptable pipe materials are: Pit Cast Iron, Spun Cast Iron, Steel, Ductile Iron, Asbestos Cement and Reinforced or Bar-wrapped Concrete 7.4.2. Surface mounted sensors can be magnetically attached to appurtenances such as line valves, hydrant secondary valves or to the top of the pipe at a maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing of 500ft (150m) 7.4.3. Longer sensor-to-sensor spacing will require the use of hydrophones 7.4.3.1. Suitable access is required to attach or adapt a 1.5” NPT female fitting to a valved fitting such as a corp valves, air blow offs, fire hydrants or tapped blind flanges. 7.4.3.2. The maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing for Hydrophone sensors is 1500ft (450m) 7.4.4. Vertical access is required to lower the sensor down from the surface. Angled or broken valve chamber are not suitable. 7.4.5. For every location, there must be a local fitting where liquid temperature and pressure can be measured. Fittings include fire hydrants, pitot taps, sampling stations and other similar appurtenances. 7.4.6. The connection point must be free of dirt and debris and in good working order 7.4.7. Diameters may range from 1” to 60” (25mm to 1525mm) in diameter. Larger mains are possible but special consideration must be taken. 7.4.8. Concrete, Mortar and Bitumen linings are acceptable if the thickness is specified 7.4.9. PVC, PE and other plastic mains are not suitable for acoustic condition assessment. 7.4.10. Performance specifications are based on a sensor spacing of 330ft (100m) 7.4.11. Performance specifications assume that accurate information has been provided regarding and pipe location including locations of bends and elevation changes. 7.4.12. Performance specifications assume that accurate information regarding pipe type (material) and diameter has been provided. 7.4.13. Accuracy of average pipe wall thickness calculations varies depending on many factors, including the consistency of the pipe materials, accuracy of the design information provided, accuracy of the pipe alignment information provided, consistency of the fluid’s bulk modulus, and consistency of the water’s temperature. In most cases, accuracies shall fall within the following ranges: 7.4.13.1. For metallic mains, average minimum pipe wall thickness will be provided within 0.15” (3.8mm). For metallic mains with lining, this will be provided as an equivalent structural thickness. 7.4.13.2. For asbestos cement mains, the average minimum structural wall thickness will be provided within 0.15” (3.8mm) 7.4.13.3. For Reinforced and Bar-wrapped concrete mains, the average minimum structural stiffness will be provided within 7200 kpsi or 50Gpa 7.4.14. For liquids other than potable or raw water, a bulk modulus calibration must be performed when needed. Normally at the outset of testing and any other times during the testing when the bulk modulus may change (during a rain event for sewer force mains) Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Valley View Road Sidewalk Phase 2 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Valley View Road Sidewalk P hase 2. INTRODUCTION: See attached Request for P urchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Valley View Road Sidewalk Phase 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: May 7, 2019 To: Mayor and City Council From: Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Subject: Request for Purchase: Valley View Road Sidewalk Phase 2 Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Background: This project will install the next segment of sidewalk along Valley View Road between Mark Terrace Drive and Moccasin Valley Road. Recall segment one, completed in 2018, completed sidewalk between the intersection of Gleason Road and Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Drive. This sidewalk is identified in the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Facilities Map and recommended in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan. It is the second of potentially three to connect the sidewalks at the High School and Valley View Middle School to the recently installed sidewalk at Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: April 26, 2019 June 26, 2019 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Blackstone Contractors, LLC Sunram Construction, Inc. GL Contracting Inc. Pember Companies, Inc. Standard Contracting Rosti Construction JL Theis, Inc. Urban Companies $217,116.75 $222,298.50 $235,374.40 $235,652.20 $244,175.10 $263,773.00 $271,059.00 $301,730.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Blackstone Contractors, LLC $217,116.75 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: _______________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This project is listed in the 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP #17-070. This project will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Environmental Impact This project involves installing a new sidewalk along Valley View Road. A multi-modal transportation system typically reduces car trips by providing other transportation options such as walking and biking. A reduction in car trips reduces our carbon footprint. Community Impact This project will provide a safe pedestrian facility to enhance safety and convenience. It is necessary to comply with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Vegetated Stormwater Best Management Practices Program Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase. INTRODUCTION: See attached Request for P urchase form. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Vegetated BMP Maintenance Request for Qualifications City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: May 7, 2019 To: Mayor and City Council From: Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Subject: Request for Purchase: Vegetated Stormwater Best Management Practices Program Services Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget A Request for Qualifications was issued to provide construction and landscape maintenance services for various stormwater best management practices (BMPs) including rainwater gardens and regional infiltration and filtration basins. The work agreement will be for up to two years of service, not to exceed $17,000 per year. The program will assist the City in meeting the minimum requirements of the MPCA municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit. Minnesota Native Landscapes was selected based on BMP maintenance approach and methodology. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: April 19, 2019 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Landbridge Ecological Minnesota Native Landscapes Outdoor Lab Not to exceed $17,000 annually over a two- year period per Request for Qualifications Recommended Quote or Bid: Minnesota Native Landscapes Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact The funding source is the stormwater utility fund, CIP item 19-347, Stormwater BMP Maintenance. Environmental Impact The project’s primary objective is to ensure that all City vegetated stormwater Best Management Practices are highly functional and aesthetically match the design. This request for purchase covers vegetated best management practices including rainwater gardens, filtration swales, and infiltration basins. The program will assist the City in meeting the minimum requirements of the MPCA municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit. Community Impact The project promotes maintenance of features that contribute to flood protection and clean water. CITY OF EDINA – BMP MAINTENANCE PROJECT -RFQ VEGETATED BMP MAINTENANCE PROGRAM CITY OF EDINA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) City of Edina Public Works (City) is establishing a pool of qualified landscape maintenance Contractors (up to three) to provide construction and landscape maintenance services. The work will include the regular and routine maintenance of various stormwater best management practices (BMPs), including rainwater gardens and regional infiltration and filtration basins of varying ages and conditions. The work contract will be for up to two (2) years of service. The City’s staff is requesting that any firm interested in providing professional services submit a statement of qualifications (SOQ). Submittal Deadline: One original paper copy of the SOQ, as outlined in this document, is due no later than 2:00 p.m. on April 19, 2019, to Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at the City Public Works office, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota, 55439. Questions regarding this RFQ must be made in writing via email to Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson at jwilson@edinamn.gov by Tuesday, April 16, 2019. General Work Description: Generally, the work is maintenance associated with selected stormwater BMPs within the City. More specifically, the work consists of providing relevant expertise (as well as all labor, materials, equipment, and skills) and performing all operations required to complete all requested maintenance work. This includes, but is not limited to the following: • Mobilization and demobilization • Maintenance of plantings • Plant replacement • Herbicide and application • Removal and proper disposal of accumulated sediment in the BMPs • Invasive species management • Mulch replenishment • Furnishing, installing, and maintaining erosion-control measures as necessary • Acquisition of all necessary permits to perform the work • Regular reporting of completed operations • Complete site restoration of all disturbed areas, as provided for in the RFQ and directed by the City CITY OF EDINA – BMP MAINTENANCE PROJECT -RFQ The selected Contractor(s) will be required to execute an agreement with the City for services on an as-needed basis. The City reserves the right to decrease, increase, or eliminate sites from the project at its discretion. The City will provide oversight and coordinate billing among all involved entities. The City reserves the right to (a) award all project sites to a single Contractor, (b) award groupings of sites (e.g., based geographically or otherwise) at its discretion to any number of responsive, responsible Contractors, or (c) advertise a new RFQ. The agreement will be for two (2) years (growing seasons) beginning in May 2019 and ending approximately November 15, 2020. Statement of Qualifications Elements: The Statement of Qualifications shall address the four (4) items listed below: 1. General Contractor Information Capacity and Work Plan a) To demonstrate the Contractor’s qualifications to perform the work, each proposal shall include a full written description of the proposer’s approach to completing the work. This should be written in a way that demonstrates the Contractor’s understanding of what is required and illustrates their approach for each type of the maintenance event listed. This description should include: 1) Size and makeup of anticipated crew (i.e., supervisors, crew chiefs, operators, laborers, etc.). 2) Equipment to be used. 3) Any pertinent information that will demonstrate the proposer’s ability to complete the work in an effective, high-quality, efficient, and timely manner. b) In addition, each proposal shall include: 1) A brief description of present commitments in 2019 and 2020 during the growing season. 2) A listing of the proposer’s equipment and hourly rates (with an operator), including any rate adjustments for 2020. 3) Labor rate sheet. 4) Key personnel and their years of relevant experience. 5) A list of Subcontractors, if any, that the proposer intends to use. 2. Employee Qualifications a) Documentation of the following qualifications shall be included in the submittal: 1) Supervisor: The Supervisor (Crew Leader) must have a Bachelor’s degree in Natural Resources, or approved equal, and extensive plant knowledge. The Supervisor shall also have experience constructing or maintaining vegetated stormwater BMPs, such as rain gardens. CITY OF EDINA – BMP MAINTENANCE PROJECT -RFQ 2) Herbicide Applicators: Any person working with chemical herbicides shall have a valid herbicide applicator’s license as required by the state of Minnesota. 3. Applicable Work Experience a) The Contractor must have performed similar vegetation management work for a minimum of five (5) projects within the past five (5) years, not including projects that were primarily vegetation installation. 1) Provide five (5) references of vegetative management work within the past five (5) years. Include only projects that were primarily vegetation management/maintenance. 2) Preference will be given to Stormwater BMP maintenance experience. 3) List the following information for each project reference: a. Customer b. Project Location c. Scope of Work d. Approximate Start and End Dates e. Approximate Contract Amount f. Owner Contact Information—Name, Position, Phone, Email References will be checked to help verify the Contractor’s record of quality, timeliness, and customer satisfaction; technical capabilities; qualified key personnel; necessary tools and equipment; adequate financial resources; and compliance with the associated legal or regulatory requirements. 4. Proof of Insurance and Bonding a) The Contractor will be required to provide proof that they can obtain performance bonding for up to $200,000. b) The Contractor and Subcontractors (if applicable) shall maintain insurance for Comprehensive Public Liability and Broad Form Property Damage, Comprehensive Automobile Public Liability and Property Damage, Contractual Liability, Completed Operations Liability, and Explosion, Collapse, and Underground Property Damage. The provisions must include coverage for Bodily Injury Liability, which includes bodily injury claims from the Contractor's and Subcontractor's employees. Minimum coverage shall be consistent with the requirement in the conditions of the agreement. 5. Unit Prices for Select Items a) In addition to the labor rate sheet and hourly equipment rates with operator, as listed above, the Contractor shall include unit prices for the furnishment and installation of the following items: CITY OF EDINA – BMP MAINTENANCE PROJECT -RFQ 1) Mn/DOT 3878.2 Type 6 Shredded Hardwood Mulch 2) #1 Containerized Perennial Plant 3) #2 Containerized Shrub 4) Perennial Plant Plug 5) Native Prairie Seed Mix (Mn/DOT 35-621) per Square Yard (SY) Installed b) Any plants or seedings installed by the Contractor shall be warrantied for one (1) year after installation and replaced at no cost to the City. Maintenance Duties Each site included in the agreement shall be subject to the same maintenance requirements, progress schedule, and reporting. Maintenance duties shall include: 1) Spring Cleanup: All planted areas shall have all perennial vegetation from the previous growing season removed to within three (3) inches above the ground, including all ornamental grasses and herbaceous plants. Shrubs shall be pruned to remove dead and dying vegetation. Accumulated sediment or debris, whether in inlet structures or the bottom of the BMP, shall be removed and disposed of at the Contractor’s expense. 2) Plant Replacement and Potted Plant Installation: During the growing season prior to June 1st of the contract year, the Contractor shall provide a plant replacement list that includes plants matching those installed in each BMP in size, spacing, and species. This list must be approved by the City. All plants are to be warrantied for one (1) year after installation and replaced at no cost to the City. 3) Seeding Native Plant Communities a) All sites that consist of native restorations will be spot treated for weed encroachment. When areas of the plant community are disturbed for weed eradication the existing soils will be prepared and Mn/DOT Seed Mix 35-621 (Dry Prairie Southeast) shall be installed as per Mn/DOT Standard Specifications 3876. The seedings are to be warrantied for one (1) year after installation and touched up to ensure thorough coverage at no additional cost to the City. 4) Routine Planting Areas Maintenance: All sites shall be inspected and maintained approximately four (4) times during the growing season (May–October), or as determined per site requirements and/or as budgets allow. a) All weeds as identified by the Contractor or as directed by the Owner or City shall be removed via manual removal or chemical herbicide application. Herbicide application shall be performed with extreme care to avoid damage to CITY OF EDINA – BMP MAINTENANCE PROJECT -RFQ existing plants. Any damaged plants shall be replaced by the Contractor without cost to the Owner or City. All planting areas shall be completely free of weeds or all weeds shall have been chemically treated after each routine visit. All applicable state regulations regarding the application of chemical herbicide are to be complied with, including, but not limited to, postings/notices of application and spray records. b) During routine visits, the Contractor shall inspect for any inlet or outlet failure, standing water, or failures of retaining walls or edging within BMPs. If any of these conditions are observed the Contractor shall contact the City for further instruction. c) All planting areas shall have a maintained depth of 3 inches of approved shredded hardwood mulch at the end of each growing season of the contract period. Mulch shall conform to Mn/DOT 3878.2 Type 6 Shredded Hardwood Mulch. 5) Review and Acceptance of Work: Upon request the Contractor shall be available for site inspection and review. Any defects in the work shall be corrected per City request. 6) Annual Maintenance Report: Once per year, the Contractor shall submit a summary of maintenance visits describing the date of each visit, maintenance activities performed, invasive species treated or otherwise eradicated, amount and type of herbicide applied, other observed issues, and recommendations for future maintenance. Project Sites List and Budget Allotment 1. The project sites list is subject to change but shall include the sites listed in Table 1 at the onset of the project. 2. Project site locations can be found on the attached Figure 1. 3. The budget allotment reflects a not-to-exceed budget for each vegetated BMP maintenance site. 4. Budget per site may be adjusted throughout the contract period to reflect progress or additional need at each site. Table 1 Project sites list and budget allotment 2019 and 2020 Vegetated BMP Maintenance Sites Site ID Owner Annual Budget Allotment Type of BMP Lakeview Drive—Golf Terrace Reconstruction RG_016 and RG_017 City of Edina $3,000 Two (2) regionally sized filtration basins Braemar Arena RG_018 City of Edina $6,000 One (1) regionally sized infiltration basin CITY OF EDINA – BMP MAINTENANCE PROJECT -RFQ 2019 and 2020 Vegetated BMP Maintenance Sites Site ID Owner Annual Budget Allotment Type of BMP Chowen Park RG_019 City of Edina $3,000 One (1) residentially sized filtration basin Edina Public Works RG_020 City of Edina $5,000 One (1) regionally sized infiltration basin with native seedings TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET ALLOTMENT $17,000 Review Notification and Agreement Process: 1. The City will review all submittals and determine which Contractors are qualified. 2. A selection will be made by the City based on the above criteria. 3. The selected Contractor(s) will be notified about which portion of the work will be awarded to them. An agreement will then be developed between the City and the Contractor. The selected Contractor(s) will enter into terms with the City including all conditions and forms of agreement as provided by the City. A Performance Bond may be required. 4. Work is to commence no later than May 15, 2019. Point of Contact: Questions regarding this RFQ must be directed to Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson at jwilson@edinamn.gov.. !( !( !( !(!( §¨¦494 £¤169 100 62 456721 456717 RG 0187505 Ikola Way RG 0193113 W 54th St RG 0207450 Metro Blvd RG 0164706 Lakeview Dr RG 0174702 Lakeview Dr SITE LOCATIONSEDINA BMP MAINTENANCECity of Edina FIGURE 1 Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6.1, 2019-04-02 10:44 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Vegetative_BMP_Maintenance\Maps\Basemaps\Site Locations.mxd User: EMA0 1,500 3,000 Feet !;N !(BMP Location Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Lincoln Drive Trail Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Lincoln Drive Trail Improvements. INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for P urchase ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Lincoln Drive Trail Improvements Staff Presentation: Lincoln Drive Trail Improvements City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: May 7, 2019 To: Mayor and City Council From: Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Subject: Request for Purchase: Lincoln Drive Trail Improvements Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Background: This project includes extending Three Rivers Park District’s Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail along Lincoln Drive from Londonderry Road north to the cul-de-sac at the end of Lincoln Drive. A portion of this shared use path is identified in the Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Maps. The remainder of the shared use path is part of Three Rivers Park District’s Master Plan, which includes future improvements to extend the regional trail from the Lincoln Drive cul-de-sac west through an existing Highway 169 underpass tunnel and into the City of Minnetonka. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: April 25, 2019 June 25, 2019 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Bituminous Roadways Inc. $308,199.75 Blackstone Contractors LLC $319,836.50 Northwest $327,941.11 GL Contracting Inc. $334,675.05 Pember Companies, Inc. $342,902.20 New Look Contracting, Inc. $352,470.00 Midwest Asphalt Services $357,710.70 Sunram Construction, Inc. $375,443.50 Urban Companies $436,857.35 Recommended Quote or Bid: Bituminous Roadways Inc. $308,199.75 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: _______________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This project is listed in the 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP #17-060. This project will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Environmental Impact This project involves installing a new shared use path along Lincoln Drive. A multi-modal transportation system typically reduces car trips by providing other transportation options such as walking and biking. A reduction in car trips reduces our carbon footprint. Community Impact This project will provide a safe pedestrian facility to enhance safety and convenience. It is necessary to comply with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. The CITY of EDINA Vacation of Easements 5901 & 5995 Lincoln Drive Resolution 2019-34 Public Hearing May 7, 2019 The CITY of EDINAExisting Easements www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINAUtilities City: No Issues, New Easements being created Private Utilities: No Objections www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINASummary Staff recommends vacating the requested easements contingent on gaining new easements and that Council approve Resolution 2019-34. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Summary Publication of Ordinance Nos. 2019-08 and 2019-09 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving summary publication of Ordinance Nos. 2019-08 and 2019-09. INTRODUCTION: State Statutes requires that the City publish all approved ordinances within 45 days of approval in its official newspaper. State Statute allows cities to choose to publish a summary of a complete public notice. On April 16, 2019, two lengthy ordinances were approved by Council. Staff recommends approving summary publication of: Ordinance No. 2019-08: An Ordinance Amending Chapters 10 and 30 of the Edina City Code Concerning Trees Ordinance No. 2019-09: An Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Sections 24-51 and 24-53 Wireless Facility Aesthetic Standards To comply with State Statute, summary publications must be approved by four-fifths majority of the Council. ATTACHMENTS: Description Summary Publication of Ordinance Nos. 2019--08 and 2019-09 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 2019-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 10 AND 30 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING TREES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on April 16, 2019, Ordinance No. 2019-08 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 2019-08 the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication and approved by the City Council as authorized by state law. The ordinance broadens the broader definition of “tree and plant pests” and include ash to the list of trees that are not defined as protected during redevelopment. A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City’s regular office hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota this ___ day of _______________, 2019. SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 2019-09 ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS 24-51 AND 24-53 OF THE CITY CODE CONCERNING SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIY AESTHETIC STANDARDS Ordinance No. 2019-09 repeals and replaces Sections 24-51 and 24-53 of the City Code establishing Wireless Aesthetic Standards that sets forth the minimum aesthetic and design standards that telecommunications providers must meet to place wireless facilities in the City’s right-of-way, minimum distance requirements between poles, a requirement to collocate more than one facility per support where feasible, and general aesthetic design standards requiring all wireless facilities to be concealed inside the support structure or below ground. A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City’s regular office hours. APPROVED for summary publication by the City Council this _____ day of ___________, 2019. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: National Police Week 2019 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proclamation declaring the week of May 12-18, 2019, as National Police Week. INTRODUCTION: In 1962, P resident John F. Kennedy signed a proclamation which designated May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day and the week in which that date falls as Police Week. Currently, tens of thousands of law enforcement officers from around the world converge on Washington, D.C. to participate in a number of planned events which honor those that have paid the ultimate sacrifice. Let this be a time to thank and honor those who dedicate their lives to serving the public. It is a week that should be set aside so everyone can be made aware of the hard work and dedication of the officers of the Edina Police Department. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: National Police Week PROCLAMATION NATIONAL POLICE WEEK 2019 May 12-18, 2019 WHEREAS, the week of May 12-18, 2019, is National Police Week in the United States; and WHEREAS, there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers service in communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Edina Police Department; and WHEREAS, over 60,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each year, resulting in approximately 17,000 injuries; and WHEREAS, since the first recorded death in 1791, a total of 21,000 law enforcement officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of duty; and WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Memorial in Washington, D.C., and WHEREAS, 371 new names of fallen heroes are being added to the National Law Enforcement Memorial this spring, including 158 officers killed in 2018 and 231 officers who died in previous years but whose stories of sacrifice had been lost to history until now; and WHEREAS, the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty will be honored during the National Law Enforcement Officer Memorial Fund’s 31st Annual Candlelight Vigil, on May 13, 2019, in Washington, D.C.; and WHEREAS, the Candlelight Vigil is part of National Police Week, which takes place this year on May 12 – 18; and WHEREAS, May 15 is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all the fallen officers and their families and U.S. Flags should be flown at half-staff; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims May 12-18, 2019, as National Police Week In the City of Edina, MN and call upon the people of Edina to observe this week in honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep the residents and City of Edina safe. Dated this 7h day of May 2019. _______________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Ryan Quinn, Assistant Fire Chief-EMS Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Emergency Medical Services Week Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proclamation declaring the week of May 19-25, 2019, as Emergency Medical Services Week. INTRODUCTION: Proclaiming the week of May 19 -25, 2019 as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week recognizes and honors the great work that our police officers, firefighters, paramedics and 911 dispatchers do every day to ensure our community receives the best emergency medical response and care possible. The National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians (NAEMT) partners with the American College of Emergency P hysicians (ACEP) to lead the annual EMS Week. EMS means more than dedication to duty and lifesaving patient care. EMS is also community care that takes time, energy and heart—far beyond the scope of the every day calling. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: Emergency Medical Services Week PROCLAMATION EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK May 19-25, 2019 WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services has grown to fill a gap by providing important, out of hospital care, including preventative medicine, follow-up care, and access to telemedicine; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consists of first responders, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, emergency medical dispatchers, firefighters, police officers, educators, administrators, pre-hospital nurses, emergency nurses, emergency physicians, trained members of the public, and other out of hospital medical care providers; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career or volunteer, engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency medical services providers by designating Emergency Medical Services Week; now NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaim the week of May 19-25, 2019, as Emergency Medical Services Week In the City of Edina, MN, with the theme, EMS Strong: Beyond the Call, I encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities. Dated this 7th day of May 2019. _________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail Draft Master Plan Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Danny McCullough and Stephen Shurson from Three Rivers Park District will present on the draft master plan for the Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail. Staff will seek a Resolution of Support for the master plan at the regular City Council meeting of May 21, 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Description Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail Draft Master Plan Staff Presentation: Trail Draft Master Plan CP Rail Regional Trail Draft master plan March 21, 2019 Three Rivers Park Districtii The mission of Three Rivers Park District is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources-based park system. Three Rivers Park District was established in 1957 after legislation was enacted in 1955 allowing for the activation of park districts whose primary duties are “acquisition, development and maintenance of large parks, wildlife sanctuaries, forest and other reservations and means for public access to historic sites and to lakes, rivers and streams and to other natural phenomena” (Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 398.07). There are more than 12.3 million annual visits to more than 26,500 acres of park reserves, regional parks and special- use areas in Hennepin and five adjoining counties and 145 miles of regional trails. Current outdoor-recreation activities in regional parks and trails include camping, hiking, cross-country and downhill skiing, tubing, bicycling, in-line skating, horseback riding, nature interpretation, golfing, fishing and swimming. Three Rivers Park District also operates a natural resources management program, which administers the restoration and perpetuation of both native wildlife and plants in order to provide park and trail visitors opportunities for high-quality recreational experiences. DISTRICT 1 Penny Steele, Term Expires 12/31/20 DISTRICT 2 Jennifer DeJournett, Term Expires 12/31/22 Corcoran, Greenfield, Hanover, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minnetrista, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, New Hope, Orono (precincts 1, 3 & 4), Plymouth, Rockford, Rogers, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, Wayzata Brooklyn Park (all precincts except W1-0 and W1-R), Champlin, Dayton, Maple Grove, Osseo DISTRICT 3 Daniel Freeman, Term Expires 12/31/20 Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park (only precincts W1-0 and W1-R), Crystal, Golden Valley, Hopkins (precinct 2), Robbinsdale, St. Anthony, St. Louis Park DISTRICT 4 John Gunyou, Term Expires 12/31/22 Deephaven, Edina, Excelsior, Greenwood, Hopkins (all precincts except 2), Minnetonka, Orono (precinct 2), Richfield (all precincts except 6 & 9), Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Woodland DISTRICT 5 John Gibbs, Term Expires 12/31/20 Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Fort Snelling, Richfield (precincts 6 & 9) Steven Antolak, Term Expires 12/31/20 Hennepin County Appointee - serves at large Gene Kay, Term Expires 12/31/18 Hennepin County Appointee - serves at large Board of Commissioners DeJournett Steele Gunyou Gibbs Freeman Cover Photo Credit: Three Rivers Park District Antolak - At Large Kay - At Large iiiCP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan Three Rivers Park District (Park District) gratefully acknowledges the staff, agency partners, community members and other participants who contributed to the CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan. The Park District extends a special thank you to the individuals listed below who provided guidance, time, questions and critical insight throughout the process. Agency Partners Mark Nolan, AICP City of Edina Transportation Planner Amy Marohn, PE City of Bloomington Civil Engineer Bob Byers, PE Hennepin County Transportation Planning Engineer Jordan Kocak, AICP Hennepin County Bicycle & Pedestrian Coordinator Three Rivers Park District Danny McCullough Regional Trail System Manager Stephen Shurson, PLA Landscape Architect Kelly Grissman Director of Planning Ann Rexine, ASLA Principal Planner Jonathan Vlaming Associate Superintendent Consultant Greta Alquist, AICP Connor Cox Chris Bower, PE Brian Tang, EIT Cindy Zerger, AICP, ASLA Ciara Schlichting, AICP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RECOGNIZING CONTRIBUTORS Three Rivers Park District iv This page left intentionally blank vCP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A LINKING REGIONAL TRAIL The Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail (CP Rail Regional Trail, or CPRRT) is a planned, 21-mile regional trail corridor that traverses six communities in Hennepin County - Bloomington, Edina, St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal (Map 1). The CPRRT will fill a critical north-south gap in the regional trail system and provide a highly desirable recreation amenity to adjacent communities and the greater region. The CPRRT’s route will provide an exclusively off-road trail experience for an estimated 305,000 users that is a safe and enjoyable recreation and active transportation option for all users regardless of age or abilities. The CPRRT will link and expand access to numerous local and regional trails, residential neighborhoods, local and regional parks, local businesses and destinations and natural open spaces such as the Minnesota River and Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve. The proposed trail alignment will connect to three regional trail search corridors and six regional trails: Nine Mile Creek, Cedar Lake LRT, North Cedar Lake, Luce Line, Bassett Creek and Crystal Lake. The trail is divided into six segments - Segment A through Segment F. The segments generally connect one regional trail to another, starting at the southern terminus of the trail alignment at the Minnesota River in Bloomington. Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MNi THE BOTTOM LINE key message theBL The CPRRT will be 21 miles long, connect to several existing regional trails and six communities including Bloomington, Edina, St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal. Map 1: CP Rail Regional Trail Segments Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN N ESO T A R I V E R NorthMississippi Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles A B C D Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail E F Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail Three Rivers Park District vi This master plan is envisioned as a working master plan that will be updated every 1-3 years to eventually include a thorough route alignment evaluation, community engagement process and preferred route selection for each segment. The completion dates of each master plan segment is shown in Table 1. The total acquisition and development costs to complete proposed and upgrade existing CPRRT segments are summarized in Table 2. The total estimated cost for all future trail segments is $27.7 million. Acquisition and construction costs for Segments B-F are estimated values since no specific route alignment has been selected. These cost estimates are subject to change and should be updated when the route alignment has been selected. At this time it is assumed that Segments B-F will all be constructed on new facilities, rather than utilizing existing facilities. It is further assumed that these segments will be constructed primarily within existing right-of-way, with a 5’-wide easement to be acquired along the entirety of the trail for initial construction, at an average cost of $8 per square foot. Trail construction costs are assumed at $300 per linear foot which is the current unit cost estimate for urban construction. When the 21-mile CPRRT corridor is fully constructed, routine maintenance operation costs including additional staffing are estimated to increase by $52,500/year (2019 dollars). Additional costs for trail surface preservation and rehabilitation (e.g. trail surface repairs, striping requirements and pavement requirements) are anticipated to increase by $72,500/year assuming a 30-year pavement life. The combined annual maintenance operation estimated cost for both route and trail surface preventative maintenance is $125,000/year. SEGMENT A: Master Plan Estimate Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Existing Mileage Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Subtotal Cost 5.62 miles 1.40 miles $100,000 $3,000,000 $3,100,000 SEGMENT C: Generalized Cost Estimate Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail Existing Mileage Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Subtotal Cost 0 miles 1.68 miles $360,000 $2,650,000 $3,010,000 SEGMENT D: Generalized Cost Estimate North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail Existing Mileage Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Subtotal Cost 0 miles 2.12 miles $450,000 $3,350,000 $3,800,000 SEGMENT E: Generalized Cost Estimate Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail Existing Mileage Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Subtotal Cost 0 miles 2.7 miles $570,000 $4,250,000 $4,820,000 SEGMENT F: Generalized Cost Estimate Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail Existing Mileage Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Subtotal Cost 0 miles 2.66 miles $570,000 $4,250,000 $4,820,000 Table 2: CPRRT Acquisition and Construction Cost Estimates SEGMENT B: Generalized Cost Estimate Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail Existing Mileage Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Subtotal Cost 0 miles 4.47 miles $950,000 $7,100,000 $8,050,000 Acquisition and Construction Cost Estimates - Rounded Totals Total Future Construction Mileage Acquisition Cost Construction Cost Total Cost 15.03 miles $3,000,000 $24,600,000 $27,600,000 Segment Master Plan Completion Date Segment A: Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail 2017-2019 Segment B: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail TBD Segment C: Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail TBD Segment D: North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail TBD Segment E: Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail TBD Segment F: Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail TBD Table 1: Master Plan Segments Completion Date CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan vii CPRRT will connect to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail on West 70th Street | Edina, MN TABLE OF CONTENTS ii 1. INTRODUCTION | Planning Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 4 Planning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Metropolitan Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Three Rivers Park District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 4 Precedent Planning Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 2. RESEARCH | Trends, Demands & Forecasts. . . . . . . . . . 5 - 10 National Recreation Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Minnesota Recreation Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 - 6 Twin Cities Regional Recreation Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Generational Recreation Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 - 7 Creating Health Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Park District Regional Trail Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 - 9 3. DESIGN GUIDANCE | Development Concept . . . . . . . . 11 - 15 Permitted Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Access to All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 12 Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 -14 Additional Trail Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 - 15 4. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE | Plans & Details ... 17 - 20 General Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Public Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 18 Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 - 19 Natural & Cultural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 20 Public Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5. IMPLEMENTATION | Estimated Costs & Funding . . 21 - 23 Transition of Existing Local Trails to Regional Trails . . . 21 Anticipated Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 Funding Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 Operations & Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 6. SEGMENT A | Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 - 36 Segment A Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Segment A Route Master Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Segment A Land Cover and Natural Heritage Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48 Funding Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 - 50 7. SEGMENT B | Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Segment B Overview sdf 8. SEGMENT C | Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Segment C Overview 9. SEGMENT D | North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Segment D Overview 10. SEGMENT E | Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Segment E Overview 11. SEGMENT F | Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Segment F Overview Appendix A | Visitation Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Appendix B | Physical Challenge Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 - 51 Appendix C | Cost Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53 - 59 Appendix D | Segment A Public and Agency Comments 61 - 73 Appendix E | Resolutions of Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Three Rivers Park District viii MAPS 1 CPRRT | Regional Trail Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v 2 CPRRT | Regional Trail Segments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 Existing and Planned Regional Trails . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 Metropolitan Council 2040 Regioanl Parks System . . . 3 5 CP Rail Regional Trail | Service Area. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6 Segment A Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 7 CPRRT | Segment A Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 8 Subsegment A1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 9 Subsegment A2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 10 Subsegment A3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 11 Subsegment A4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 12 Subsegment A4 Route Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 13 Subsegment A4 Alternatives Analysis Cost Estimate . . 35 14 MLCCS | Segment A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 15 Segment B Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 16 Segment C Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 17 Segment D Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 18 Segment E Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 19 Segment F Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 TABLES 1 Master Plan Segments Completion Date . . . . . . . . . . . . .vi 2 CPRRT Acquisition and Construction Cost Estimate . . . vi 3 Master Plan Segments Completion Date. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 4 Generational Recreation Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 5 Regional Trail Typical Cost and Descriptions. . . . . . . . . .8 6 Wayfinding Signage Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 7 Wayfinding Signage and Other Regional Trail Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8 Routine Trail Maintenance Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9 Existing CPRRT Subsegments for Future Inclusion in Park District Regional Trail System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 10 Future CPRRT Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 11 Acquisition Needs for Future CPRRT Segments . . . . . . .22 12 Operations & Maintenance Costs Summary . . . . . . . . . . 23 13 Segment A | Length and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 14 Subsegment A4 Route Option Characteristics . . . . . . . 34 15 Segment B | Length and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 16 Segment C | Length and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 17 Segment D | Length and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 18 Segment E | Length and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 19 Segment F | Length and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 GRAPHS 1 Determinants of Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 08 2 Regional Trail Use by Activity & Season . . . . . . . . . . . . . .09 FIGURES 1 Urban and/or Curbed Rural Trail Section . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2 Rural and/or Park Trail Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 3 Subsegment A4 Planning Timeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4 Online Interactive Feedback Map for Subsegment A4.32 1CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan When complete, the Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail (CPRRT) will span 21 miles and connect the communities of Bloomington, Edina, St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal. The trail alignment generally parallels the Canadian Pacific Rail line (CP Rail), which stretches south to north from the planned MN River State Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail. This future paved, multi-use, regional trail will expand recreational and transportation access to park and trail facilities, residential neighborhoods and commercial nodes. The CPRRT route is divided into six planning segments - each segment representing a connection between existing regional trails (Map 2, Table 3). The context of the CPRRT in relation to other planned and existing Three Rivers Park District regional trails is shown in Map 3. A roller skater along the CP Rail Regional Trail through Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MN INTRODUCTION PLANNING FRAMEWORK 1 THE QUICK TAKE-AWAY key message theQT The CPRRT’s principle goal is to provide a comfortable and attractive south-north regional trail that connects the six communities along its route while also connecting to local destinations and regional trails. Map 2: CP Rail Regional Trail Segments Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN NESOT A R I V E RNorthMississippi Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles A B C D ST. LOUIS PARK EDINA BLOOMINGTON GOLDEN VALLEY E NEW HOPE FCRYSTAL Segment Segment Extents Master Plan Completion City Chapter A Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail 2019 Bloomington and Edina 6 B Segment B: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail TBD Edina and St. Louis Park 7 C Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail TBD St. Louis Park 8 D North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail TBD St. Louis Park and Golden Valley 9 E Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail TBD Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal 10 F Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail TBD New Hope and Crystal 11 Table 3: Master Plan Segments Completion Date Three Rivers Park District2 Carver ParkReserve Cleary LakeRegional Park Murphy-HanrehanPark Reserve Lake Minnetonka LRTRegional Trail Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Cedar Lake LRTRegional Trail North Cedar Lake Regional TrailDakota RailRegional Trail Sarah CreekRegional Trail Crow RiverRegional Trail Lake IndependenceRegional Trail Medicine LakeRegional Trail Rush Creek Regional Trail Crystal LakeRegional Trail Shingle CreekRegional Trail Luce LineRegional Trail Bassett CreekRegional Trail Twin LakesRegional Trail DiagonalRegional Trail MapleGrove Medina Plymouth Dayton NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood TonkaBay Nine Mile CreekRegional Trail Nokomis-MinnesotaRiver RegionalTrail Luce LineState Trail Minnesota Valley State Trail West MississippiRiver Regional Trail M ISS I SSI PPI RIVER CROWRIVERBaker/Carver Regional Trail Champlin Rogers Greenfield Corcoran Independence Minnetrista St. Bonifacious Gale WoodsFarm KingswoodPark BakerParkReserve Lake RebeccaPark Reserve NoerenbergGardens Crow-HassanPark Reserve Elm CreekPark Reserve Mississippi GatewayRegional Park Fish LakeRegional Park SilverwoodPark Eagle LakeRegional Park FrenchRegional Park Robbinsdale BrooklynPark BrooklynCenter Osseo Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina Lake Minnetonka Big Island Lake MinnetonkaRegional Park MIN N E S O TAR I V E R North MississippiRegionalPark CP RailRegionalTrail Map prepared for Three Rivers Park Districtby Toole Design Group - May 2018 This GIS Data is provided "as is" without warrantyof any representation of accuracy, timeliness, orcompleteness. The user acknowledges and acceptsthe limitations of the Data, including the fact that theData is dynamic and is in a constant state of maintenance,correction, and update. 0 2 4 6 8Miles Search Corridor, Proposed, Met Council Approved Search Corridor, Existing, Park District Concept Search Corridor, Proposed, Park District Concept Other Agency, Non Existing Other Agency, Existing TRPD, Existing TRPD, Non Existing, Approved Master Plan TRPD, Non Existing Alternative, Approved Master Plan TRPD, Under Construction Search Corridor, Existing, Met Council Approved TRPD, Existing, Local Trail, Agreement Pending Map 3: Three Rivers Park District Existing and Planned Regional Trails CP Rail Regional Trail CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 3 26,500+ acres park reserves, regional parks & special recreation features 145 + 12 million annual visitors regional trail miles Park District Overview PLANNING PROCESS The CPRRT will be planned in phases, one phase for each of the six segments of the trail. During each phase, a segment’s exact route alignment will be solidified. When an update to the Master Plan is adopted, that segment officially becomes a planned regional trail as defined by the Metropolitan Council and becomes eligible for Regional Parks funding for implementation. Each phase of the planning process will include community engagement and a route evaluation process to select a preferred alignment for each segment of the regional trail. Detailed descriptions of the planning process for each segment will be provided in Chapters 6-11. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL The Twin Cities nationally renowned Metropolitan Regional Parks System significantly contributes to the area’s high quality of life. Establishing green space for recreation and resource protection enhances the region’s livability and economic strength. The Metropolitan Regional Parks System includes 62 regional parks, park reserves and special recreation features - plus 340 miles of regional trails. Currently, there are 54,286 acres of protected land open for public use with planned acquisition of an additional 70,000 parkland acres and 760 regional trail miles over the next 25 years to meet the region’s growth expectations. The Metropolitan Regional Parks System is made up of 10 park implementing agencies consisting of six county park departments, three city park departments and Three Rivers Park District. Metropolitan Council is the regional planning agency that oversees and provides partial funding of the acquisition, development and operation of the Metropolitan Regional Parks System. Metropolitan Council and park implementing agencies also develop regional park policies to protect the region’s water quality; promote best management practices; and help integrate the parks system with housing, transportation and other regional priorities. Metropolitan Council provides guidance in the development of regional park and trail master plans and the CPRRT reflects that guidance. Each regional park or trail must have a master plan approved by Metropolitan Council prior to receiving Metropolitan Council funding. The master plan must address boundaries and acquisition, demand, development concept, implementation schedule, development and operational costs and natural resources. Public input is encouraged throughout the master planning process. Metropolitan Council’s planning requirements help ensure consistency between the implementing agencies and their regional plans. The CPRRT regional trail search corridor is identified in Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Regional Parks System Plan (Map 4). THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Three Rivers Park District (Park District) is an independent special park district charged with the responsibilities of acquisition, development and maintenance of regional parks and trails for the benefit and use of residents and visitors of suburban Hennepin County, the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area and the State of Minnesota. The Park District works cooperatively with local communities, counties, public agencies, the Metropolitan Council, and the State Legislature. The Park District’s mission is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources-based park system. The Park District was established in 1957 by the Minnesota State Legislature when prominent members of the community promoted the benefits of parks in the outlying areas of Hennepin County. 63 2040 REGIONAL PARKS POLICY PLAN THREE: System Plan Figure 14: 2040 Regional Parks System Plan Bloomington 88Three RiversPark District Dakota County Anoka County Scott County Carver County Ramsey County Washington CountySt. PaulMinneapolisPark & Rec Board 0 5 10 15 202.5 Miles City and Township Boundaries County Boundaries Lakes and Rivers Regional Parks, Park Reserves, Special Recreation Features Existing Planned Boundary Adjustment Search Area Regional Trails Existing Regional Trails Planned Regional Trails Regional Trail Search Corridors 2040 Regional TrailSearch Corridor Additions State and Federal State Lands State Trails Federal Lands CP Rail Regional Trail CP Rail Regional Trail Map 4: Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Regional Parks System Plan Three Rivers Park District 4 The CPRRT complements various previous planning documents.Source: Metropolitan Council & Hennepin County Regional Trail Planning Guidelines The Park District manages its lands under four categories of regional open space: regional park reserves, regional parks, regional special recreation features and regional trail corridors. Regional trail corridors like the CPRRT are intended to provide recreational travel along linear pathways that transcend multiple jurisdictions and may, or may not, also serve a transportation function. In addition, regional trails follow criteria established by the Metropolitan Council and Park District: “Regional trail corridors are carefully selected to follow natural or cultural linear features with scenic appeal and/or historical, architectural and developmental interest, connect people with places, help create a sense of place amongst the greater community, intersect with local trail, sidewalk and bicycle networks, provide access to mass transit and link components of the regional park system together.” Regional trails may function as a destination or linking regional trail or both. For either regional trail type, adjacent land with significant natural or cultural resources may be acquired as part of the trail corridor. • Destination regional trails are developed as greenways or linear parks, and are distinct in that the trail itself is a destination. This type of regional trail typically is an independent facility and includes a wide corridor providing opportunities for improving wildlife habitat, protecting natural/cultural resources and providing recreational opportunities. • Linking regional trails serve a greater transportation function and act as the back bone to the regional trail system by connecting the regional park system to itself and the people it serves in a logical and efficient manner. The CPRRT will serve as a linking regional trail, connecting six communities and many regional trails, including Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail, North Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Luce Line Regional Trail, Bassett Creek Regional Trail and Crystal Lake Regional Trail. PRECEDENT PLANNING DOCUMENTS The CPRRT Master Plan builds off of the CPRRT Feasibility Report, which was completed by the Park District in 2010. The report includes a technical feasibility section with descriptions of individual trail segments and potential construction and environmental impacts. The report also includes social feasibility, economic feasibility, railroad approval and phasing strategies, and potential funding sources. In addition to the feasibility report, the CPRRT is consistent with the vision of several agencies along the trail corridor. This master plan serves to solidify those independent visions into one documented trail route, supported by agencies, residents and users. The CPRRT corridor, generally aligned adjacent to the Canadian Pacific Railway, is identified and defined by the following plans: • Metropolitan Council ‘2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan’ as a regional trail search corridor • Metropolitan Council ‘Regional Bicycle System Study’ (2014) identified the CPRRT alignment in the regional bicycle transportation network • Metropolitan Council ‘Regional Bicycle Barriers Study’ (2018) identified fifteen barrier crossings along the CPRRT: five in Tier 1, nine in Tier 2, and one in Tier 3 • Hennepin County ‘2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan’ as a ‘planned off-street bikeway search corridor’ (Hennepin County Planned Bikeway System, April 2015) In addition, portions of the CPRRT corridor have been identified in local bicycle, pedestrian, trail, or comprehensive plans: • City of Bloomington ‘Alternative Transportation Plan’ (2016) identifies the alignment of the CPRRT, although the trail is labeled as the ‘Hyland Regional Trail’ • City of Edina ‘Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan’ (Draft 2018), identifies two small portions of Subsegment A4 (described in more detail in Chapter 6 of this master plan) as new planned shared-use paths, including West 78th Street, Dewey Hill Road and a small portion of Bush Lake Road between Dewey Hill Road and West 76th Street • City of St. Louis Park ‘Active Living: Sidewalks and Trails Plan’ (2007) identifies a portion of the CPRRT on the southern end of the city • City of Golden Valley ‘Comprehensive Plan 2040’ (Draft 2018) identifies the CPRRT as a proposed north-south route from the City of New Hope boundary to City of St. Louis Park boundary • New Hope Comprehensive Plan (2008) identifies the CP Rail Corridor as a “Potential Rail ROW sharing” • City of Crystal ‘Park and Recreation System Master Plan’ (2017) identifies a regional trail connection from Winnetka Avenue North, through Valley Place Park, Bassett’s Creek Park and continuing southeast past Highway 100 that generally follows the CP rail trail corridor 5CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan RESEARCH TRENDS, DEMANDS & FORECASTS CPRRT is anticipated to become a significant regional trail destination due to its connectivity with recreational amenities including existing and proposed regional trails, regional park reserves and to various retail and commercial nodes. National, state, regional and Park District recreational use trend studies support continued expansion, improvement and implementation of trails. Recreational studies also indicate that of the wide varieties of recreation activities, trails appear to be the common thread across most demographics groups. NATIONAL RECREATION TRENDS According to the Outdoor Recreation Participation Topline Report (2017), nearly half of all Americans – 48.6 percent – participated in at least one outdoor activity in 2016. That equates to 144 million participants who went on a collective 11 billion outdoor outings. While the participation rate and number of participants slightly increased over the past year, the number of total outings decreased due to a decline in outings per participant. Aspirational participation, which measures the physical activities that interest non-participants, showed that many Americans were drawn to outdoor recreation over sports, fitness and leisure activities. In fact, all aspirational participants — regardless of age — reported bicycling in their top six most appealing activities. The report details youth, young adult and adult participation rates and frequencies for popular types of recreation. Running, jogging and trail running topped each age cohorts recreation participation list, followed closely by bicycling. Chrildren bicycling on a regional trail. 2 The Outdoor Recreation Trends and Futures technical document (2010) has reported that the number and percentage of people ages 16 and older participating in walking and bicycling continue to increase nation-wide, giving a positive outlook for regional trail development. Walking for pleasure and bicycling report in at over 200 and 88.3 million participants respectively (2005-2009) - numbers that have been steadily increasing since the report’s first recorded numbers in 1982. The Outdoor Recreation Trends and Futures document further investigates recreational participation by ethnic populations, concluding that minority populations nation-wide are still underrepresented in outdoor recreation overall - which is also consistent with Minnesota data. However, of those minority populations that were surveyed who did participate in outdoor activities (the largest minority groups in the United States being African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanics), running/jogging and trail running ranked highest as their top selection (ages 6 and older). THE BOTTOM LINE key message theBL Parks and trails support an active, healthy lifestyle for all who use them. Parks and trails build strong families and communities, nourish bodies and minds, attract economic development and growth and preserve and protect the natural environment. The number and percentage of people ages 16 and older who walk and bike continue to increase nation-wide.Source: Outdoor Recreation Trends and Futures (2010) MINNESOTA RECREATION TRENDS The Minnesota’s State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP), published by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR), provides goals and strategies that reinforce the vision and strategic directions that comprise the Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. It further defines the geographic Three Rivers Park District 6 pattern of high growth continuing in the greater Twin Cities metropolitan area. This new growth will fuel demands for near- home recreation opportunities in these areas. Two-thirds of all recreation use occurs within a half-hour drive from home; creating the need for outdoor recreation lands near areas of higher population density and growth. Sustaining existing outdoor recreation facilities for future generations remains a key issue. The primary goal of the SCORP is to increase participation in outdoor recreation by all Minnesotans and visitors. By increasing recreation facilities and increasing them in or near populated areas and populated areas with increasingly diverse populations, the CPRRT will help meet this goal and start to respond to some of the trends and issues identified in the SCORP. The SCORP cites several studies showing that involvement in nature-based outdoor recreation among young adults and their children has decreased since the 1990s. The relative participation of different segments of the population in nature- based outdoor recreation, together with their respective population growth rates, create significant challenges ahead in terms of park and trail utilization, as well as maintaining broad- based public support for park and trail investments. TWIN CITIES REGIONAL RECREATION TRENDS The Metropolitan Council notes the Twin Cities metropolitan area is projected to be home to almost 3.7 million people by 2040, a gain of 824,000 residents from 2010. With this growth will come new jobs, greater racial and ethnic diversity, expanded economic opportunities and increased tax revenues. In addition, the Twin Cities population is changing in ways that will influence park and trail decision making: • Our region is aging rapidly. More than one in five residents will be age 65 and older in 2040, compared to one in nine in 2010. • The region will gain 391,000 households by 2040. • By 2040, 40% of the population will be people of color, compared to 24% in 2010. The share of people of color is greater among younger age groups; 54% of residents under age 18 will be people of color in 2040. • Broad-based trends consistently indicate that recreation participation is far greater for white and/or non-Hispanic populations within the state and nation than for people of color, according to the SCORP. Metropolitan Council demographers have identified that about half of the total increase in population for the region from 1990 to 2000 was contributed to immigration of first-generation U.S. citizens and the births of their children. This trend was expected to continue through 2010, if not longer. Within the region, there are several prevalent immigrant groups: Hmong/Southeast Asian, Hispanic/Latino, Somali and West Africans. To date, this influx of new immigrant groups are generally not participating in regional trail use at the same rates as non- immigrant populations. The Park District is committed to better understanding this phenomenon and will continue to study this further with the ultimate goal of attracting regional trail users which mirror the demographics of the region. Once this is understood, this will be reviewed to consider steps to better serve those community groups which may include signage in multiple languages, learn to bike/commute classes, bike rental/ bike share or similar. GENERATIONAL RECREATION TRENDS In the U.S., there are six living generations, which are six distinct groups of people. They have had collective experiences as they aged and therefore have similar ideals and stereotypes. Social generational theory provides an opportunity to help understand current and projected generational tendencies related to outdoor recreational trends. Regional trails appeal in some form to all six generations for various reasons - whether that be healthy living objectives or quality of life factors. The Park District continues to explore how to retain existing regional trail users and remain relevant to the changing needs of future generations. This may be in the form of more identified vehicle parking for users with ambulatory needs or more pet- waste stations for young adults that use Park District trails with dogs. These generational recreation trends require occasional review - because as trail users age, so do their desires and needs for a robust regional trail system (Table 4, following page). Photo credits (this page and next): Sixty and Me, Quikbyke, MnDNR, Bike Bandit, Ann Rexine & Momentum Magazine CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 7 Generation Class Collective Experiences Recreation Trends Design Recommendations Greatest Generation • Born 1901-1926• 4 million population • Suffered and persevered through Great Depression and then fought in WWII • Known for personal responsibility, humble nature, work ethic, prudent saving and faithful commitment. • Mature adults who are interested and able, connect with outdoor recreation through walking, hiking and light exercise. • Interest in biking has increased, as mature adults look to keep muscles and joints healthy and strong. Biking also maintains range of motion, movement and balance. This does decline however, as this cohort ages. • Spending time outdoors and staying physically active can have significant health benefits for older adults. Physical and mental benefits include increased vitamin D levels, improved immunity, reduced feelings of anxiety and depression, increased energy, more restful sleep, better attention levels and better recovery rates from injury and illness. • Multi-use trails are important for aging adults - however they feel more safe when bicyclists and pedestrians are separated. • Trail intersections and crossings must have truncated dome treatments with adequate crossing times. • Pavement must be well-maintained, free of obstructions, non-slip and wide enough for wheelchairs. • Seating at predictable intervals is imperative. Silent Generation/ Traditionalists • Born 1927-1945• 30 million population • Grew up during the Great Depression and WWII and either fought in WWII or were children. • Majority are retirees who are known for traditional family values, simplicity and comfort, demand for quality and financial security. Baby Boomers • Born 1946-1964 • 76 million population • Born during a spike in population after WWII and was known as the largest living generation until the Millennials recently outpaced them. • Grew up during the Civil Rights Movement and Cold War. Known for experimentalism, individualism and social cause orientation. • Can be distrustful of government. Generation X • Born 1965-1980 • 66 million population • Generation born between two larger generations (Boomers and Millennials). • First generation to develop ease and comfort with technology. • Known for informality, independence, multi- tasking, entrepreneurs and family time values. • Can be distrustful of institutions. • Take a more lighthearted attitude than their predecessors and approach outdoor activity more as a sport. • Risk, challenge and adrenaline are important motivators for participating in outdoor activities. They embraced competition and particularly risk, pushing back the limits of every outdoor sport - and inventing some new ones of their own. The term “extreme sports” is associated with Generation X. • High demand for local trail access to parks, trails and destinations (library, restaurant, commercial etc.) - which complements active family lifestyles. This generation has influenced the real estate market and community planners to answer this recreational need nationwide - promoting access to parks, recreation amenities and programming. Generation Y/Millennials • Born 1981-2004* • 80 million population • Grew up with technology (computers, cell phones, internet, etc.). • Largest living generation (surpassing Boomers). Expected to continue growing until 2036 as a result of immigration. • Known to be informal, more culturally and racially tolerant, entrepreneurs, acceptant of change, achievement oriented and financially savvy with need for instant gratification. • Due to social media and access to the internet, Millennials are not used to feeling alone. Thus, they are not looking to spend a quiet day alone in a park. • Readily share recreation experiences in real-time. • As this generation delays traditional marriage and families, pet ownership has increased. • Millennials like to stay active, so parks with trails for biking, running and open fields for group activities are attractive. • Park and trails with water access and pet waste stations for dogs is appealing. Generation Z/ Digital Natives • Born 2004 - present • 74 million population and growing • First living generation to exclusively grow up with technology (computers, cell phones, internet, etc.), which equates to true digital natives. • Growing up in a world where options are unlimited but their time is not. • Quick adapters to sorting and assessing large amounts of information. • While this generation’s recreational identity and interests are still developing, enticing them away from screen-time and into the outdoors will continue to be a challenge for park and recreation planners, practitioners and designers. Recreation planners and practitioners are currently strategizing how to incorporate quality screen-time into outdoor play, nature and exercise. Table 4: Generational Recreation Theory Source: Three Rivers Park District & various sources GENERAL NOTE: Generation classes, years, ages and populations are estimates - varying sources will all offer slightly difference estimates. Pew Research Center defines Millennials as being born from 1981 onwards, with no chronological end point set yet. Demographers William Straus and Neil Howe define Millennials as born between 1982 -2004.* Three Rivers Park District 8 CREATING HEALTH EQUITY Minnesota, on average, ranks among the healthiest states in the nation. But those averages do not tell the whole story. Minnesota has some of the greatest health disparities in the country between whites and people of color. America ranks 27th among affluent nations in life expectancy and 30th in infant mortality. At the same time, our nation spent more than $3.2 trillion dollars on health care in 2015, more than any other country.1 Health care spending per person continues to grow faster that the American economy. Annual premiums for family coverage have nearly doubled from 2002 - 2012.2 Yet, as seen in Graph 1, clinical care only accounts for 10 percent of a person’s health determinant. The largest determinants of a person’s health is based upon social and economic factors (income, housing, insurance coverage, care giving) and health behaviors (activity/exercise, nutrition, smoking, obesity, substance abuse, etc.). new trail projects. It also provides clear direction to promote active transportation through fostered relationships between park and trail agencies, transportation departments and health care officials. PARK DISTRICT REGIONAL TRAIL TRENDS Visitation to the Park District’s regional trails is now estimated at over 5 million visits per year. The number of trail miles has grown from 56 miles (2009) to 145 miles (2018). Use patterns within the Park District’s system of parks and trails have also changed. The Boomers who used to bring their children to Park District parks are now empty-nesters and have flocked to the regional trails to get exercise and to get outdoors. Biking, as a form of transportation, has gained traction over the past five years throughout the metro region and more users are now bike commuting. The Park District’s work with local communities and Hennepin County has resulted in a regional trail network that is better connected to the local “feeder” trail, sidewalk and bike lane networks, making the system more accessible to a larger portion of the population. In 2011, Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail surpassed 500,000 visits - marking the first time in the Park District’s history that a regional trail received a half million visits. Now seven years later, Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail remains the most visited in the Park District’s system; third only to Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail (1,386,200 visits in 2017) and Kenilworth Regional Trail (746,400 visits in 2017) within the Metropolitan Regional Parks System. Of the 16 Park District regional trails that received visitor counts in 2017, six received 500,000 or more visits. For comparison purposes, five of the 21 park reserves, regional parks and/or special recreation features received 500,000 or more visits. As of 2017, regional trail visits accounted for over 40 percent of all visits to the Park District’s facilities. Trail visitation is expected to continue to increase at a rate greater than the expected increase in population and to increase at a rate faster than expected visitation increases to the Park District’s park units. Regional Trail | User Data Metropolitan Council data reveals that regional trails are most heavily visited during the spring, summer and fall seasons with summer receiving 35 percent of annual visits, spring and fall each receiving 27 percent of annual visits and winter receiving 11 percent of annual visits. Winter has seen more seasonal growth, in part due to warmer winters, the increased use of trails for commuting and the use of trails for year-round exercise regimens. Park District research shows that summer trends continue to indicate that biking is, and will remain, the predominant regional trail activity at 72 percent, followed by walking (18 percent) and running (8 percent). In-line skating, users with mobility-devices and other miscellaneous uses make up the balance of trail users. However, Park District winter data reveals a different narrative. Bicycling drops significantly during the winter season, while the walking and running groups continue to utilize regional trails (Graph 2). Recreation providers can have a direct and positive impact on a person’s health by creating accessible and affordable access to parks and trails. Direct exposure to nature is essential for healthy childhood development and for the physical and emotional health of children and adults. Research findings recognize the following health benefits: • Improved physical activity • Improved nutrition • Reduced stress • Enhanced cognitive abilities • Improved self discipline • Improved academic performance • Reduced ADD symptoms • Improved creative problem solving • Improved social relationships A recent MnDOT study3 has described that physical activity can prevent illness and death from chronic diseases - specifically MnDOT concludes that bicycling three times per week provides the following: • 46% lower odds of metabolic syndrome • 31% lower odds of obesity • 28% lower odds of hypertension In turn, these bicycling benefits are estimated to save Minnesota residents between $100 - $500 million per year in medical related costs. This study’s research allows recreation planners the ability to more accurately represent the cost/benefits of Social & Economic Factors 40% Health Behaviors 30% Genes & Biology10% Physical Environment10% Clinical Care10% Graph 1: Determinants of Health Source: Minnesota Department of Health 1 Center for Health and Learning 2 Kaiser Institute 3 Assessing the Economic Impact & Health Benefits of Bicycling in Minnesota, MnDOT, 2016. CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 9 • A diversity of natural settings (woodlands, wetlands, prairies, etc.) • Visual and physical separation from motor vehicles • A continuous and contiguous route with limited stop conditions • A smooth surface (either paved or aggregate) • Connectivity with destinations and other bicycle/pedestrian facilities • Opportunities for loops • Trail amenities - drinking water, mileage markers, restrooms and wayfinding Some bicycle and pedestrian studies also indicate that participants are willing to spend more money and travel longer distances to utilize facilities that incorporate these preferences. In recognition of user preferences, the CPRRT route was selected to provide linkages to regional recreation destinations; balance recreation and natural resources; minimize stop conditions, provide a safe, off-road, multi- modal transportation option, and ultimately, increase the desirability of the regional trail. CPRRT Projected Use and Visitation The percentage breakdown by activity of CPRRT will generally mirror Park District regional trail activity trends. Bicycling will be the primary regional trail use, with ancillary uses such as walking, running and in-line skating capturing a smaller percentage of the total use. These expected uses remain consistent throughout the trail corridor with the exception of where the regional trail passes through commercial areas. In these locations, it is anticipated that the regional trail will receive an increased percentage of pedestrian activity associated with the sidewalk network. Seasonal use percentages for the CPRRT are expected to be consistent with regional trail seasonal use with 88 percent of visitation occurring in the spring, summer and fall seasons. Winter use of the CPRRT is dependent on weather conditions, available budget and the assistance of local communities to maintain the trail. Local communities will maintain the regional trail during the winter months as resources allow and demand warrants it. The Park District currently partners with cities to encourage winter maintenance of regional trails by offering financial contributions to help offset plowing costs. This payment to cities is based on the number of miles within each city’s borders. When fully-constructed, the CPRRT is projected to generate 305,000 annual visits. This visitation estimate is calculated based on the following cumulative methodology: 1) Metropolitan Council’s annual estimated visits to a comparable regional trail (Luce Line Regional Trail) and 2) population within 1.5 miles of the regional trail (Appendix A, Visitation Methodology). Park District studies indicate that 50 percent of regional trail users live within 1.5 miles from the trail (core service area) and 75 percent of users live within 3.5 miles of the trail (primary service area) (Map 5, following page). The vast majority of regional trail visitors use trails for recreation and exercise. However, regional trail use for commuting/transportation purposes is on the rise. Recently, the Park District significantly expanded the regional trail system within urban, fully-developed communities. This increased commuting/transportation regional trail use is captured in current Park District data that shows 23 percent of all regional trail visits are now for commuting purposes (up from about 1 percent in 1998, and up from 12 percent in 2009). Regional trails that are paved, with few stop conditions, limited interactions with motor vehicles and with seamless connections to employment, retail and commercial centers have a greater percentage of regional trail visits attributed to commuting than regional trails without these three attributes. While these certainly are not the only factors in determining the desirability of a regional trail corridor for commuting purposes, they appear to play an important role. Bicycle commuting is increasing as more residential housing opportunities arise near regional trail access points.Source: Cup of Jo, Joanna Goddard Regional Trail | Visitor Preferences Bicycle and pedestrian studies from across the country, and over the last 25 years, have come to the same general conclusions regarding user preferences - regardless of user type. Trails with the following characteristics will attract visitors from greater distances, will have greater annual use and will produce more enjoyable experiences for trail users: • Natural settings (scenic, vegetation, limited evidence of the built environment, etc.) Other, 1% Bicycling, 72% In-line Skating, 1%Walking/Hiking, 48% Graph 2: Regional Trail Use by Activity & Season Source: Three Rivers Park District Summer Season JuneJulyAugust Walking/Hiking, 18% Running/Jogging, 8% Other, 1% WinterSeason DecemberJanuaryFebruary Running/Jogging, 23% Bicycling, 28% Three Rivers Park District 10 DEMOGRAPHIC EQUITY ANALYSIS The racial and ethnic composition of the primary service area of the CPRRT is expected to generally mirror the demographics of the surrounding community in which the trail is located. Based on research conducted by Three Rivers at trails from similar areas of the metro region, it is expected that 50% of the trail users will live within 1.5 miles of the trail (Core Service Area), and 75% of the trail users will live within 3.5 miles of the trail (Primary Service Area). Three Rivers research also reveals that the primary under- represented groups of people using Three Rivers Park District regional trails today are: • People of color • People older than sixty years of age • People from households that earn less than $50,000 Based on the 2010 U.S. Census and the 2016 American Community Survey data, the following chart shows the demographic analysis of the expected CPRRT users from under-served populations in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. It aslo compares the demographics of the CPRRT service areas to Three Rivers Park District’s jurisdiction, suburban Hennepin County, as well as all of Hennepin County. Table 5. Demographic Analysis of Service Area Within 1.5 miles of CPRRT (Core Service Area) Within 3.5 miles of CPRRT (Primary Service Area) Suburban Hennepin County (TRPD jurisdiction) Hennepin County Classification Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total All People of Color (Adults)*26,954 17%94,320 23%109,156 19%210,795 24% Non-Hispanic Black (Adults)*11,569 7% 45,958 11% 43,310 7% 92,529 10% Non-Hispanic Indian (Adults)*983 1%3,165 1%3,337 1%9,275 1% Non-Hispanic Asian (Adults)*8,155 5%25,400 6%37,026 6%54,591 6% Non-Hispanic Hawaiian (Adults)*88 <1%232 <1%286 <1%500 <1% Non-Hispanic Other (Adults)*263 <1%692 <1%884 <1%1562 <1% Non-Hispanic Mixed (Adults)*530 <1%1,842 <1%1,873 <1%3,878 <1% Hispanic (Adults)*5,366 3%17,031 4%22,440 4%48,460 5% People > 60 years of age**54,512 34%113,192 28%111,013 19%213,157 24% Households with Income < $50,000**37,402 35%97,915 39%73,371 28%189,397 39% Sources: * 2010 Census, US Census Bureau ** 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, US Census Bureau The CPRRT will serve approximately the same proportion of minority populations as compared to County as a whole. It will serve a higher proportion of people 60 years of age and households with less than $50,000 as compared to the county. CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 11 Map 5: CP Rail Regional Trail | Service Area Source: Three Rivers Park District HENNEPIN COUNTY ST. LOUIS PARK EDINA BLOOMINGTON GOLDEN VALLEY NEW HOPE CRYSTAL Three Rivers Park District 12 This page left intentionally blank 13CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan The routing of the CPRRT will provide regional trail users the opportunity to enjoy and experience some of the region’s scenic landscapes and parks, as well as connect to existing regional trails including the Nine Mile Creek, Cedar Lake LRT, North Cedar Lake, Luce Line, Bassett Creek and Crystal Lake Regional Trails. The regional trail will incorporate safe crossings of significant pedestrian and bicycle barriers including county/state highways and connections to adjacent local trails. The CPRRT is intended to safely accommodate 305,000 annual visits, an array of non-motorized uses, a variety of skill levels and persons with special needs. In addition, the regional trail is intended to support both recreation and commuting uses and incorporate trail amenities that enhance trail users’ experiences. Similar to many regional trail corridors, the CPRRT corridor includes several challenges associated with constructing a regional trail where trail right-of-way does not exist, providing access to and across natural resources areas and balancing safety, public expectations, natural resource protection and potential private property impacts. In areas where physical challenges exist, and in accordance with the route evaluation criteria, willing-seller property acquisition will be considered. The CPRRT will be designed and constructed in a manner that meets user expectations and needs, meets industry standards and best management practices and is financially responsible. As such, the Park District utilizes a series of regional trail practices and guidelines in respect to trail design and support amenities. These practices and guidelines are summarized in this chapter and will serve as the basis for design and construction of the CPRRT. DESIGN GUIDANCE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT Park District staff conducting field work along segment A4 of the CPRRT | Edina, MN3 PERMITTED USES CPRRT intended uses include walking, jogging, in-line skating, bicycling and other uses mandated by state law including, but not limited to, non-motorized electric personal assisted devices. Motorized vehicles will be prohibited, except for motorized vehicles used by the Park District and partner cities for maintenance or law enforcement activities or otherwise permitted for ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) access. ACCESS TO ALL The Park District is committed to providing access and recreational opportunities to all people, including persons with disabilities, people of color and other special-population groups. The Park District meets this commitment through appropriate facility design, programming considerations and by actively addressing potential barriers to participation. THE BOTTOM LINE key message theBL The CPRRT is planned as a linking regional trail - offering an important connection between Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve and Crystal Lake Regional Trail. Three Rivers Park District 14 All regional trail facilities, including associated trailheads and trail amenities, will be designed to accommodate individuals with disabilities and developed in accordance with ADA standards and guidelines. Specific design guidelines are discussed below in this section. The Park District pursues promotional outreach activities and works with special-interest organizations such as the Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute and Wilderness Inquiry to further encourage participation in activities and use of park facilities by persons with special needs. If arrangements are made in advance, interpreters and alternative forms of printed material are available at programmed events. In addition to accommodating individuals with disabilities, the trail corridor passes through several Hennepin County cities, providing access to people with different social and cultural backgrounds and connecting those persons with important local community destinations such as parks, commercial areas, community facilities, cultural destinations and transit facilities. On a broader scale, communities adjacent to the trail will not only have access to the CPRRT but also gain direct and indirect access to several existing park reserves, regional parks and regional and state trails. To improve local access, neighborhood trail connections are anticipated at regular intervals. The Park District does not charge entrance fees for its regional trails; therefore, the regional trail is available for all users to enjoy regardless of financial status. DESIGN GUIDELINES In accordance with its regional designation and associated anticipated use, the CPRRT will be designed as an off-road 10-foot-wide, non-motorized, paved, multi-use trail. A bituminous trail surface is preferred because it is cost-effective, less prone to erosion than aggregate surfaces, provides a desirable trail user experience and is more appropriate given the anticipated visitation and connections to other paved facilities. Curb ramps will be used at all roadway crossings. The preferred maximum trail grade is 5 percent with a 2 percent cross slope for drainage. Much of the CPRRT is anticipated to be an independent trail corridor separate from roadways, including urban, curbed rural and park sections (Figures 1 & 2, following page). Descriptions and associated costs for those regional trail typicals are included in Table 5. In areas where the trail will be located adjacent to a roadway, the following design considerations apply. Where right-of-way allows, final trail design will attempt to maximize the boulevard width to account for sign placement, snow storage and possibly trees or other complementary enhancements. In circumstances with limited right-of-way, the trail is still planned to be located off-road, but with less boulevard between the trail edge and back of the curb. In these locations, the trail will be separated from the road by a minimum paved two-foot-wide clear zone. This paved clear zone between the back of the curb and the trail edge provides a buffer between the trail users and motorists and will be striped to delineate the edge of the trail. In the event there are instances where the trail will not initially meet the preferred design, trail designers will evaluate a wide variety of design tools to determine the best fit for the unique situation. Unless the alternative trail design is an acceptable long range solution, it is anticipated that noncompliant trail segments would be improved as funding, right-of-way or other opportunities present themselves. A number of factors will be considered during the design phase, such as: • Right-of-way width/acquisition needs • Topography and drainage impacts • Existing vegetation • Driveway/road crossings • Overhead and subsurface utilities • Proximity to adjacent buildings, homes, businesses and industrial facilities • Wetlands/floodplain locations, potential impacts and rules • Wildlife (species, nesting/breeding areas and times and concentrations) • Existing infrastructure • Connectivity with other trail/sidewalk/bicycle facilities • Safety • Cost • Obstructions • Trail user preferences/desired trail user experience • Opportunities to coordinate with other projects/agencies Table 5: Regional Trail Typical Cost and Descriptions New Construction Trail Type Unit Cost (2019 dollars)Description Urban $325 / LF Trail construction replacing an existing curb/gutter, cut/ remove existing pavement, relocating storm sewer and other utilities, working under traffic controls. Curbed Rural $300 / LF Trail construction in a rural/suburban environment that has no existing curb/gutter, converting it to a curb/ gutter design with storm sewer as needed. Rural $120 / LF Trail construction through a rural road ditch area with enough separation with the road to not require a curb/ gutter. No major extra fill or excavation. Park $120 / LF Trail construction through a park or open space where curb and gutter is not required and ample space is provided for signage and rest stops.Regional trails are designed and developed to meet ADA standards and guidelines. CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 15 In addition to the discussed design considerations, regional trail segments will be designed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local codes. More specifically, the following sources will be referred and adhered to when preparing the design and construction plans as appropriate: • Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, prepared by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2012 • MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), March 2007 • State Aid Rule 8820.9995 Minimum Bicycle Path Standards, State Aid for Local Transportation • Trail Planning, Design, and Development Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), MnDOT, May 2015 • Public Right-of-way Access Guidelines (PROWAG) • Best Practices for Traffic Control at Regional Trail Crossings, A collaborative effort of Twin Cities road and trail managing agencies, July 2011 • Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding, Metropolitan Council, October 2011 • Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part I and II: Best Practices Design Guide (FHWA); ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (United States Access Board); and ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (U.S. Access Board) • Guidance for Three Rivers Park District Trail Crossings, December 2013 Throughout the design process of the CPRRT, the Park District will work closely with the local communities to route the trail in a manner that has the greatest public benefit and least amount of private property impacts. Trail/Road Crossings There are several locations where the regional trail crosses roadways and in which careful attention to detail is required to provide a safe and user friendly crossing. The types of trail crossing treatments will be designed in accordance with industry best standards to ensure conflicts between trail users and roadway traffic are minimal. In all cases, existing roadway configuration, infrastructure elements, vegetation and other potential visual obstructions will be evaluated so sight lines can be maintained. Special provisions, such as mirrors, may be added to improve trail visibility from driveways if deemed appropriate. As vehicular traffic fluctuates, there may be a need for additional traffic signals or modifications to existing signalized intersections. These type of design considerations and trail enhancements will be addressed during the trail design phase. Figure 1: Urban and/or Curbed Rural Trail Section Figure 2: Rural and/or Park Trail Section Three Rivers Park District 16 Wetland & Floodplain Crossings There may be portions of the regional trail that traverse wetlands and floodplains. In these instances, the regional trail design may incorporate bridges, boardwalks and other creative solutions to minimize potential natural resources impacts while maintaining a contiguous and continuous trail corridor. Design and implementation of bridges and boardwalks will be coordinated with the appropriate regulatory agencies to ensure all requirements are met and any potential impacts are minimized. Drainage In locations where the regional trail is adjacent to a roadway, the drainage of the regional trail is similar to that of a typical sidewalk. Stormwater sheet flows over the trail pavement and onto adjacent urban roadways, where it is collected and conveyed by the roadway stormwater drainage system. In areas where the regional trail is on an independent route, such as through parks or other green spaces, or adjacent to rural road segments, alternative stormwater best management practices, such as rain gardens and infiltration swales, may be explored during the design phase of the regional trail. Stormwater must shed rapidly from the surface of the trail and not pool on the trail surface to prevent hazardous situations for the users. Design of stormwater management practices will be coordinated with regulatory and other affected parties to ensure all requirements are met and any potential impacts are minimized. Traffic Signage & Devices In addition to wayfinding signage, the regional trail will incorporate traffic control signs and devices, such as trail stop signs and center line pavement markings. These signs and devices will reflect the physical characteristics and usability of individual trail segments and the system as a whole. The cost to add traffic control signs and devices, including striping, to a regional trail is approximately $1 per linear foot (2018 dollars). Physical Challenges There are several instances where the CPRRT route presents physical challenges which require design modifications or upgrades to existing infrastructure. To date, these existing barriers have only been reviewed at the planning level. Maps outlining where these areas exist along the corridor is included in Appendix B. More details are required as these improvements move from planning to programmed projects. Trailheads The CPRRT will have three trailhead kiosks, located at the beginning, middle, and end of the trail corridor. The southern end of the trail will feature a trailhead kiosk in Bloomington near the Minnesota River. Trailhead kiosks are also planned to be located near the midpoint of the trail, and one at the northern terminus of the trail in the City of Crystal. Additional trailhead improvements may be necessary to adequately support the regional trail while not negatively affecting the existing function of facilities. The Park District will collaborate with local communities where trailhead improvements are necessary. ADDITIONAL TRAIL ELEMENTS Unifying elements such as trail identity, crossings, wayfinding, traffic signage and devices, rest stops, drainage and trailheads are important elements of regional trails. Their proper design and placement add both aesthetic and functional value to the trail. As a linking regional trail, a primary design goal is to create a trail system that is comfortable and intuitive to navigate. Designing the trail with unifying elements and incorporating local parks and adjacent natural resources will help achieve a cohesive CPRRT corridor. Wayfinding Regional trail wayfinding signage provides trail users with orientation and location information for amenities and services. Wayfinding signage typically provides: • An overview map of the agency partner’s regional trail system and the specific regional trail. • Directions and distances to major destinations and points of interest along the regional trail. • Directions for long-term detours or interim routes when there are gaps within the regional trail. • Location information for nearby amenities such as local parks and local trails. • Location information for nearby services, such as drinking water, public restrooms and public parking. • Visual identification of the regional trail network through physical kiosk/signage structures. The Park District employs three types of wayfinding signage structures: system kiosks, regional trail kiosks and directional signage (Table 6). A trailhead kiosk on an existing Three Rivers Park District Regional Trail. System Kiosk Free-standing, roofed structure Displays map of regional trail systems and the regional trail rules. Regional Trail Kiosk Free-standing, roofed structure Displays aerial map, description of trail highlights and a map of the entire regional trail that depicts local trails, amenities and services nearby. Directional Sign Post structure with description blades attached Displays the direction, name and distance to major destinations and points of interest on the trail. Each post structure has the capability of holding up to 12 description blades. Table 6: Wayfinding Signage Components Source: Three Rivers Park District CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 17 Placement of wayfinding signage structures along regional trails typically follows one of three configurations listed as Level A, B or C (Table 7). The wayfinding is intended to complement and work in collaboration with local and regional wayfinding efforts as well as adjacent land uses and development initiatives. There may be conditions along the regional trail corridor where the wayfinding signage is altered or otherwise enhanced to better serve the trail user and appropriately fit the surrounding environment. The wayfinding plan for the CPRRT includes signage at strategic delineated points. The exact location and content of wayfinding signage will be determined in conjunction with local community input and is often dictated by available public right-of-way. Further wayfinding details are included in the planning budget analysis (Appendix C). Rest Stops Rest stops are generally located every mile and provide places for trail users to stop and rest and an area for amenities such as trash receptacles, benches and bicycle racks. These simple but important amenities can serve to reinforce the identity of the regional trail route and better support trail users with mobility challenges. General locations will be further evaluated during the design phase. The rest stop design may be modified to best meet the available right-of-way, adjacent land use and complimentary facilities such as a bus stop. Further rest stop details are included in the planning budget analysis (Appendix C). Bicycle Repair Stations Recently, the Park District has been installing bicycle repair stations which provide tools necessary to perform basic bike repairs and maintenance - from changing a flat to adjusting brakes and derailleurs. The tools and air pump are securely attached to the stand with stainless steel cables and tamper- proof fasteners. Hanging the bike from the hanger arms allows the pedals and wheels to spin freely while making adjustments. Bicycle repair stations are recommended at Level A wayfinding configurations and as-needed throughout the regional trail corridor. A bicycle repair station located along Bloomington Ferry Road in Subsegment A1 of the CPRRT in Bloomington. LEVEL A Location Components Estimated Cost Beginning/end of regional trail and at halfway point if regional trail is greater than 10 - 15 miles.** • System kiosk • Regional trail kiosk • Directional sign • Bike repair station (optional) $46,500-$47,700 Includes signage panels, bicycle repair station, bench(es), trash can and concrete pad LEVEL B Location Components Estimated Cost Approximately every 2 miles along regional trail. For new Level B locations, consider establishing on trails north side** • Regional trail kiosk • Directional sign $28,500 (Includes signage panels and concrete pad) LEVEL C Location Components Estimated Cost Approximately every 1 mile along regional trail. For new Level C locations, consider establishing at intersections with other regional trails or comprehensive trail systems (not trail spurs).** • Directional sign $9,000 (Includes signage panels and concrete pad) REST STOPS Location Components Estimated Cost Approximately every 1 mile along regional trail. • Trash receptacles • Benches • Bicycle Racks $6,000 Table 7: Wayfinding Signage and Other Regional Trail Configurations* * 2018 dollars ** Exact location & content determined in conjunction with local community input. Three Rivers Park District 18 This page left intentionally blank 19CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan The Park District and its partners will operate the CPRRT using a wide variety of professional staff and in accordance with Park District policies, guidelines and ordinances. This chapter outlines the operations and maintenance guidelines; however, as with all regional trail initiatives, further maintenance expectations are solidified within subsequent Trailway Cooperative Agreements with local municipalities, Hennepin County, MnDOT and/ or other governmental partners as needed. In addition, it is anticipated that regional park agencies will assume operation and maintenance responsibilities for trail sections they have jurisdictional control or responsibility. In such cases, those regional park agencies will operate and maintain the trail in a manner that provides a seamless user experience with trails owned and operated by the Park District. GENERAL OPERATIONS The Park District Ordinance specifies rules and regulations in order to provide for the safe and peaceful public use of Park District areas and facilities; for the educational and recreational benefit and enjoyment of the public; for the protection and preservation of the property, facilities and natural resources of the Park District; and for the safety and general welfare of the public. Regional trails are open to the public year-round, from 5 AM to 10 PM. The Park District’s present policy provides for the operation and maintenance of regional trails from April 1 to November 14. Subsequently, the Park District does not anticipate plowing or otherwise maintaining the CPRRT during the winter season. Local communities may elect to operate and maintain the regional trail segment during winter months with a winter use permit. The Park District may revise this policy at a future date and elect to operate and maintain the trail year-round. Regional trail staffing levels fluctuate to account for seasonal use patterns, maintenance requirements and available funding. At the time this master plan was written, general regional trail rules to be observed by users are as follows: • No motorized vehicles and no horses. • Obey traffic signs and rules. • Dogs must be leashed (6-foot, non-retractable max). Owners must pick up pet waste. • Yield to slower trail users. • Keep right except when passing. • Warn others when passing. • Respect adjoining landowner’s rights and privacy. • Be alert and be courteous. PUBLIC SAFETY Three Rivers Park District Public Safety Department, in partnership with local public safety departments, will provide a safe environment for regional park and trail users and assist with trail education and enforcement. Public Safety officers strive to educate and inform trail users on safe trail usage but also have arrest and enforcement authority as a fully-licensed police department within the State of Minnesota. Patrol Plan Public Safety Officers will utilize a variety of specialized patrol methods. Public Safety Officers will be supported by volunteer Trail Patrollers which will assist with patrol and incident response along the CPRRT. Frequencies of Public Safety Officers and the volunteer Trail Patrol will be adjusted as necessary to account for trail use, incident level, other concerns which may arise, and available funding. In addition to routine patrol, Three Rivers Public Safety Officers may be dispatched through the Hennepin County Dispatch System to respond to incidences as they occur. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE PLANS & DETAILS Lake Rebecca Park Reserve Maintenance along the regional trails. Image Credit: Three Rivers Park District4 THE BOTTOM LINE key message theBL CPRRT will be open to the public 7 days a week, 365 days per year - from 5AM - 10PM. It will be maintained by the Park District or its partners from April 1 - November 15. Three Rivers Park District 20 Mutual Aid While Three Rivers Park Police will assume the lead role in providing public safety services to most regional trails in suburban Hennepin County, a statewide mutual aid program assists to facilitate assistance and sharing public safety resources from surrounding police agencies in times of emergency or other unusual conditions. Public Safety Equipment & Staffing Due to the creative deployment of existing Park District Police Officers, utilization of seasonal staff, statewide mutual aid program, and a successful Trail Patrol volunteer program, no additional equipment or full-time Public Safety positions are anticipated to serve the CPRRT. As such, no additional operational funds are needed to provide public safety services along the CPRRT. Maintenance Plan The Park District and its partners will maintain the CPRRT in a safe, clean and usable manner. Maintenance is an important part of providing high-quality customer service and meeting trail user expectations. Routine Maintenance Maintenance operations typically include seasonal condition assessments and periodic inspections, followed by necessary maintenance actions. Inspections address possible safety issues, vandalism and non-routine maintenance concerns (Table 8). The Park District and its partners will also respond to maintenance issues identified by the public on a timely basis as funding permits. Extraordinary maintenance will occur in response to storm damage, vandalism or other unplanned circumstances. When the 21-mile CPRRT corridor is fully realized, routine maintenance operation costs, including additional staffing, are estimated to increase by $52,500/year (2019 dollars). Additional costs for trail surface preservation and MAINTENANCE The Park District and its partners are responsible to maintain parks and trails in a safe, clean and usable manner. Maintenance will include both typical, routine maintenance such as mowing, sweeping and trash clean-up as well as specialized maintenance such as small building construction, non-paved trail repair and grooming. Maintenance will be done by a wide variety of highly skilled and trained maintenance professionals including carpenters, mechanics, park workers, and electricians complemented by seasonal staff. Time of Year Routine Maintenance SPRING April & May • Sign inventory and replacement • Spring clean-up • Minor bridge and underpass repair (as needed) SUMMER June, July, August & September • Erosion repair • Fence repair • Sign and post replacement • Trash pickup • Bridge and boardwalk repair (as needed) • Vegetation control (as needed) FALL October & November • Bituminous patching and striping replacement (as needed) Throughout the season and/or in response to storm-related damage • Mowing • Periodic trail sweeping • Trash pickup • General clean-up and similar tasks Table 8: TRPD Routine Trail Maintenance Calendar Park District public safety officers and trail ambassadors patrol regional trails. rehabilitation (trail surface repairs, striping requirements and pavement requirements) are anticipated to increase by $72,500/year assuming a 30-year pavement life. The combined annual maintenance operation estimated cost for both routine and trail surface preventative maintenance is $125,000/year for the entire trail. These costs will be incurred by the Park Districts and its partners for the segments they respectively manage. Maintenance of regional trail segments with limited property rights or segments that do not meet standard regional trail characteristics may require atypical maintenance. In addition, the following specialized maintenance procedures are anticipated: Preventative Surface Treatment CPRRT will receive scheduled striping, seal coating and redevelopment under the established pavement management program and in accordance with regional trail standards and CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 21 Regional trail maintenance includes maintaining vegetative clearances (where appropriate, per Trailway Cooperative Agreements). Park District regional trails are maintained to a high level of standard for trail user experience and enjoyment. as funding permits. Partner agency’s pavement management plan may be on a different schedule than the Park District’s. Pavement management is estimated to cost approximately $3,368/year/mile. The Park District and its partners will also seek opportunities to work with Hennepin County and local cities in conjunction with road projects to improve trail design and surfacing. Trail/Bridge Inspection & Maintenance Trails are inspected annually in the spring as part of the pre-season maintenance program and are then inspected periodically by Park District maintenance staff as part of ongoing operations. Minor trail repair is handled on a timely basis and probable major repair needs are evaluated and recommended to Park District management for planning or engineering review. Major trail rehabilitation projects are submitted to the Park District Board of Commissioners or partners for funding as part of annual operating budgets, preservation and rehabilitation programs or capital improvement programs. While no new pedestrian bridges and underpasses are anticipated at this time, it is possible that they may be needed at a future date to accommodate changing traffic patterns and volumes and unforeseen safety concerns. The ownership and maintenance responsibilities associated with any new pedestrian bridges/underpasses constructed as part of the CPRRT will be determined at which point funding is requested. Existing grade separated CPRRT crossings owned by other agencies such as I-494/MN 5 are the responsibility of MnDOT. The Park District, and its partners, only maintains the trail use of said bridges and underpasses. Noxious Weed Management The Park District and its partners mechanically or chemically removes noxious weeds within the defined trail corridor at the request of cities. Edge/Trail Shoulder Vegetation Management The Park District and its partners will maintain vegetative clearances so as not to negatively affect trail use on any sections where trail shoulder vegetation exists. Regional Trail Maintenance Staffing The CPRRT will be primarily maintained by the Park District’s regional trail maintenance crew with some support from partner agencies. In the event additional mitigation requirements are necessary such as rain gardens or other best management practices, additional seasonal staffing may be required to complete the work. If necessary, seasonal staffing budgets will be developed and evaluated during the design development phase. Maintenance Staffing Maintenance will be completed by regional trail maintenance crew. In consideration of the future increased responsibilities, an additional 0.5 FTE maintenance position will be required to provide regional trail maintenance in accordance with current Park District regional trail maintenance practices and procedures. $35,000/year0.5 FTE (full time employee) NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCES The Park District and its partners will protect and enhance natural and cultural resources along the CPRRT corridor where deemed appropriate. Resource Protection Plan The Park District, under the guidance of existing natural and cultural resource management plans, will utilize best practices to minimize any potentially negative impacts, work with adjacent property owners on how to best protect and manage significant resources and incorporate opportunities to enjoy and interpret the resources present. If additional property along the regional trail which encompasses significant natural or cultural resources is acquired, the acquiring agency will develop a stewardship plan specific to that resource and in accordance with other existing natural and cultural resource management plans. Potential natural or cultural resource impacts as a result of trail design and construction are addressed in Chapters 6-11. Three Rivers Park District 22 Resource Staffing Much of the CPRRT will likely be routed along existing public road right-of-way with limited natural and cultural resources. Areas of significant width will be more of the exception than the rule and directly relate to the resource value, direct and indirect costs, recreation benefit, willingness of the property owner and support of the local municipality. To account for minimal resource management along the trail corridor, additional seasonal or contract staffing such as Conservation Corps of Minnesota, is anticipated. Sustainability The updated 2016 Sustainability Plan guides the Park District’s efforts toward achieving established sustainability goals and targets by outlining broad strategies for organizational implementation. The following goals provide guidance and intent to the Park District’s sustainability efforts in respect to regional trails: • Manage and operate Park District parklands and facilities in a manner that ensures ecological, financial and social integrity of the park system in perpetuity. • Reduce dependence on fossil fuels to minimize green house gas (GHG) emissions and reduce public expenditures. • Reduce Park District environmental impacts to demonstrate (or model) organizational commitment to environmental stewardship. • Design parks and trails that maximize the ability of the public to use non-motorized transportation. Specific to regional trails, the 2016 Sustainability Plan provides the following strategies: • Place priority on regional trail routes that have the potential for the greatest number of non-motorized commuting trips over routes with lesser commuting potential; • Work collaboratively with municipalities and neighborhoods to reconfigure park and regional trail access points to encourage pedestrian and bicycle access. The Park District strives to utilize appropriate sustainable best management practices and guidelines such as the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (B3 Project) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development (LEED) Rating System on construction projects that support the CPRRT. Additionally, for regional trails, best management practices may include utilizing porous pavement, rain gardens and recycled construction materials. It is anticipated that partner agencies share these same goals and desire to increase sustainability as well. PUBLIC AWARENESS The Marketing & Community Engagement Department manages a centralized marketing communications function that oversees the Park District’s website, public relations, marketing, media relations, social media, brand management, event planning and promotion. A number of effective marketing and outreach tools are used to promote the Park District, including but not limited, to events calendars, maps, digital and social media, direct mail, press releases, a centralized reservation system, brochures, advertising, and on-site promotion. The Park District collaborates with a wide array of community, business and government organizations to promote its facilities, programs and services and to educate the public about its resources. The Park District also works with the Metropolitan Council Regional Parks System, the State Office of Tourism and other partners to leverage shared opportunities for creating awareness and visibility. Additionally, a focus is placed on developing partnerships and programming opportunities that allow the Park District to better serve all residents of Suburban Hennepin County, especially those with less access to its facilities and programs. Since the CPRRT is envisioned to be owned and operated jointly with Park District partners, Additional care and coordination will occur to ensure shared messaging and cross marketing occurs. Share the Trail Safety for all regional trail users is a top priority. Regional trails are a shared public space which serve a variety of user groups. However, from time to time, trail users may find themselves in conflict with other users. Everyone benefits when people respect each other’s mode of travel. The Park District encourages users to respect each other through a “Share the Trail” safety campaign. Park District partners are anticipated to support this campaign along their trail segments. The most common conflicts involve cyclists and pedestrians as they move at very different speeds and take up different spaces. Cyclists often do not alert pedestrians when passing at high speeds, which can cause sudden and startled responses from those on foot. Sometimes groups of walkers can take up both lanes, which leaves cyclists nowhere to pass as they move through. Both users have a responsibility to share the trail. Another common safety concern revolves around obeying traffic signs. Cyclists are sometimes required to stop at roadway crossings and there is often confusion between motorists and cyclists regarding right-of-way. Overall, cyclists need to obey traffic signs in order to stay safe. Share the Trail signage example - located along regional trails. Source: Three Rivers Park District - artwork by Adam Turman 23CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan The CPRRT Master Plan includes a cohesive implementation plan with estimated costs and funding strategies. Implementation will occur at the discretion of the Park District and its partners and only when they are financially prepared to assume the operation and maintenance responsibilities and costs of the regional trail. Construction of non-existing CPRRT segments will occur as opportunities present themselves and as resources allow. A phased approach allows for trail segments to be constructed in a logical manner and respond to the demand and support from the local community, collaboration with other projects and maximizing internal and external funding opportunities. The timing of implementation is also dependent on the acquisition of the corridor (where necessary) which, under a predominantly willing-seller approach, may take decades to realize. TRANSITION OF EXISTING LOCAL TRAILS TO REGIONAL TRAILS Over five miles of the CPRRT already exists, in varying conditions, completing nearly 25 percent of the 21-mile trail corridor. Those completed segments are currently owned, operated and maintained by local municipalities (Table 9). The CPRRT Master Plan directs that the existing CPRRT segments be elevated to regional status, thus allowing the Park District and its partners to enter into Trailway Cooperative Agreements with local municipalities to own, operate and/or maintain said segments. When the timing of these agreements will occur, are at the discretion of the Park District and its partners. In addition, the Park District will not assume ownership, operation and maintenance responsibilities of existing trail segments until they are regionally significant (i.e. connect to greater regional park and trail segments, are long enough to have regional draw etc.). Anticipated Costs The total acquisition, development and operations and maintenance costs to complete proposed and upgrade existing CPRRT segments are summarized in Table 10 and detailed in Appendix C. IMPLEMENTATION ESTIMATED COSTS & FUNDING Lake Rebecca Park Reserve The CPRRT weaves through the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MN5 Table 9: Existing CPRRT Subsegments for Future Inclusion in Park District Regional Trail System Subsegment Miles Municipal Jurisdiction Anticipated Costs A1 0.75 Bloomington $90,000 A2 4.35 Bloomington $210,000 A3 0.52 Bloomington $30,000 Total 5.62 miles THE BOTTOM LINE key message theBL CPRRT implementation will be phased as available land and financial resources prohibit the entire 21-mile corridor from being constructed as one project in the near future. Table 10: Future CPRRT Segments Municipality Acquisition Costs Construction Cost Total Cost A Bloomington & Edina*$100,000 $2,830,000 $2,930,000 B Edina & St. Louis Park $950,000 $7,100,000 $8,050,000 C St. Louis Park $360,000 $2,650,000 $3,010,000 D St. Louis Park & Golden Valley $450,000 $3,350,000 $3,800,000 E Golden Valley, New Hope & Crystal $570,000 $4,250,000 $4,820,000 F New Hope & Crystal $570,000 $4,250,000 $4,820,000 $3,000,000Rounded Cost Estimates *Segment A cost estimates based on Master Plan alignment $24,430,000 $27,430,000 Three Rivers Park District 24 Scenario Description Type of Property Right Acquisition Strategy Acquisition Cost Public right-of-way For segments immediately adjacent to roads Right-of-way certificates, limited use permits, and/or easements Secure through Trailway Cooperative Agreement negotiations or development projects No Cost Public Property For segments through publicly held land Limited use permits, and/or easements Secure through Trailway Cooperative Agreement negotiations or development projects No cost Private Property For segments across and along private property Fee-title or easements Willing-seller approach. Acquisition will occur when land owners are ready and interested in selling their property or are considering development of their property - providing an opportunity to negotiate the designation of the regional trail corridor as part of development. Creative acquisition strategies such as easements, lot splits, resale of surplus property, transfer of development rights and similar to best meet the needs and expectations of all involved parties will be explored. Minimum: $3,000,000 Table 11: Acquisition Needs for Future CPRRT Segments The estimated master planning level acquisition and construction cost estimate for the unbuilt trail sections and upgrades to existing segments is estimated at $27.4 million. Acquisition costs are estimated at $3 million and construction costs are estimated at $24.4 million In recognition of the anticipated acquisition phase duration and amount of resources and coordination necessary to construct the remaining 15 miles of regional trail, it is anticipated that the CPRRT will not be fully-constructed for another 10-20 years. ACQUISITION The proposed CPRRT segments are a combination of trail adjacent to roads (off-street, within road right-of-way), trail through public property and trail through private property (Table 11). Acquisition costs could be reduced by waiting for the regional trail to be realized through land use development and/or road reconstruction. A detailed analysis of the acquisition costs are outlined in Appendix C. Due to the willing-seller approach, the CPRRT acquisition phase may take years to fully realize. There may be additional acquisition opportunities to acquire a wider trail and ultimately create a more desirable user experience by buffering the trail from surrounding development and by incorporating areas of natural or cultural resource significance. The acquisition needs presented in this master plan are the minimal acquisition requirements to achieve a continuous and contiguous corridor. Cost estimates assume that a 5’-wide easement will be required throughout the entire trail corridor at a cost of $8/SF. DEVELOPMENT The development costs for the remaining 15 miles include all foreseeable costs to construct the trail to regional trail standards including site preparation, reconfiguration and upgrade of rural to urban roadways (addition of curb and gutter), modification of drainage patterns, storm water treatment, bridges and boardwalks, wetland mitigation, utility relocation and installation of signage, striping, kiosks, rest stops, landscaping and similar support elements. Cost estimates assume bituminous trail construction costs at $300/linear foot. Preliminary implementation cost estimates are summarized in Appendix C. Regional trail development will be phased and significantly tied to opportunities that take advantage of external funding sources, road reconstruction projects, development initiatives and local and regional political will. At the time of this plan, Segment A through Bloomington is mostly complete. In the short term, connecting Hyland Park Reserve to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail has been recognized as an achievable gap and would begin to establish the trail as part of the greater regional trail network. Mid and long-term projects require significant funding which often take a substantial amount of time to coordinate. CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 25 Mileage Annual Cost Additional Basic Operation Services • Segment A: Bloomington-owned/operated, existing & planned trail(Subsegments A1, part of A2, A3)2.86 $17,300 Routine Operations and Maintenance $52,500/year Pavement Management $72,500/year • Segment A: TRPD-owned/operated, existing & planned trail (Subsegments: part of A2 & A4) 4.16 $25,200 • Segments B, C, D, E and F: TRPD -owned/operated planned trails 13.63 $82,500 Total 20.65 miles $125,000 *based on Park District estimated costs; agency partner cost estimates may differ. Table 12: Operations & Maintenance Costs Summary* Park District regional trails provide various user experiences and wayfinding. FUNDING PLAN The CPRRT Master Plan outlines funding strategies and opportunities for future property acquisition, physical trail development and ongoing operations and maintenance. Acquisition Funding As a component of the Metropolitan Council’s Regional Park and Trail System Acquisition, it is anticipated that up to 75 percent of all acquisition funding will come from the Metropolitan Council. This funding is generated by Metropolitan Council bond funds, Environmental Natural Resources Trust Fund and Parks and Trails Opportunity Legacy Fund, with the remaining 25 percent of acquisition coming from the Park District’s Land Acquisition Development and Betterment Fund or general obligation bonds and its partners. Development Funding Regional trail development is anticipated to be funded through a variety of funding sources and partners including Federal Transportation Department: Federal Land Access Program, Federal Transportation grants, Federal Recreation Trail Program, Metropolitan Council: Bonds and Parks and Trails Legacy Funds, Park District: general obligation bonds, Hennepin County Bikeway Grant Program, local communities and similar. Operations & Maintenance Operation and maintenance costs for new Park District CPRRT segments will be primarily funded through the Park District Operating Budget. The Operating Budget’s primary source of funds is local property taxes with some revenue from the State of Minnesota as part of the Operations and Maintenance Fund allocations from the Metropolitan Council. Additional costs associated with pavement maintenance will be funded from the Park District’s Asset Management Program, which includes revenue allocated to the Park District from the State of Minnesota as well as the Park District general obligation bonds. All operation and maintenance costs are subject to the annual budget preparation process approved by the Park District Board of Commissioners. The City of Bloomington is a Regional Park/Trail Implementing Agency, the operations and maintenance of the Bloomington trail segments, outside of Hyland Park Reserve, will be the responsibility of the City of Bloomington. The operations and maintenance cost summary is summarized in Table 12 by existing and future CPRRT segments. Greater detail is provided in Chapter 4. Three Rivers Park District26 This page left intentionally blank 27CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan SEGMENT A OVERVIEW This 7-mile trail segment begins at the Minnesota River on the south end of Bloomington and runs north into the southern portion of Edina. Segment A connects the Minnesota River Valley State Trail in the south to the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve, Bush Lake, Normandale Lake to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (Maps 6 & 7 and Table 13). SEGMENT AMinnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Trail users enjoy Segment A of the CPRRT in the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MN6 Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN N ESOTA R I V E R North MississippiRegionalPark Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles A Map 6: Segment A Context Three Rivers Park District 28 Map 7: CPRRT - Segment A Overview 494 494 212 169 212 169 100 100 17 28 1 34 OLD SHAKOPEE RD WBUSHLAKERDEPIONEERTR L FRANCE AVE SBUSH LAKE RDNORMANDALE BLVD0 0.35 0.7 1.05 1.40.175 Miles Search Corridor, Proposed, Met Council Approved Search Corridor, Proposed, Park District Concept TRPD, Existing Regional Trail TRPD, Planned Regional Trail, Approved Master Plan Other Agency, Planned Trail Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve Hyland Lake Bush Lake BLOOMINGTON Minn e s o t a R i v e r EDINA Normandale Lake Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail #CityStatus Length Notes Acquisition & ConstructionOperation & MaintenanceA1 BloomingtonExisting - (Bloomington Responsibility) 0.75 mi.Connects Minnesota River to Old Shakopee Rd $90,000 $13,350 A2 Existing - (Bloomington Responsibility) 1.47 mi.Old Shakopee Road to Hyland PR, East Bush Lake Road to 84th $210,000 $26,150 Existing - (TRPD Responsibility) 2.88 mi.Trail through Hyland Park Reserve $51,300 A3 Existing + Planned (Bloomington Responsibility) 0.64 mi. (0.52 mi. existing, 0.12 mi. planned) Trail connection over I-494 to 78th $245,000 $11,400 A4 EdinaPlanned - (TRPD Responsibility) 1.28 mi.May require easement along Cahill Road, new traffic signal at E Bush Lake/Industrial Boulevard and retaining wall along 70th Street $2,715,000 $22,800 Subtotals 7.02 mi.$3,260,000 $125,000 Table 13: Segment A | Length and Cost A1 A2 A3 A4 CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 29 Map 9: Subsegment A2 169 169 28 1 34 1 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1 Miles Existing trail segment Proposed trail segment CPRRT Alignment A2End A2Start Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve Bush Lake Hyland Lake W Old Shakopee Road Bloomington Ferry Road W 106 th Street Bush Lake Road East Bush Lake Road W 84 th Street SUBSEGMENT A1 The entire length of Subsegment A1 is an existing trail built by the City of Bloomington. Subsegment A1 (0.75 miles) stretches from the Minnesota River at Crest Avenue (Old Bloomington Ferry Bridge) to Old Shakopee Road (Map 8). The trail is along the north side of Crest Avenue, then along the west side of Bloomington Ferry Road which passes directly alongside the Dred Scott Playfield. The planned MN River State Trail will also connect to this segment of the CPRRT. A portion of the existing trail in Subsegment A1 separates bicycle and pedestrian trail users. Though this separated trail design is satisfactory, and no changes are required, it is not the anticipated standard design for future CPRRT trail segments. Subsegment A1 is owned, operated and maintained by the City of Bloomington. Future operations, maintenance and improvements of this subsegment will remain the responsibility of the City of Bloomington. The Park District will recognize Subsegment A1 as part of the CPRRT. This segment will also remain as a part of the City of Bloomington’s local bicycle and pedestrian network identified as the “Hyland Trail”. Both agencies will work together to create and fund a wayfinding signage solution that identifies the segment as part of the greater CP Rail Regional Trail alignment as well as part of the Bloomington bicycle and pedestrian network. SUBSEGMENT A2 Subsegment A2 (4.35 miles) is an existing trail built by the City of Bloomington that follows the west side of Bloomington Ferry Road from Old Shakopee Road to West 106th Street, then along the north side of West 106th Street to Bush Lake Road. The trail then follows along the west side of Bush Lake Road (Map 9) up to Maryland Road where the trail crosses the street and runs up the north side of Bush Lake Road before it goes through the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve. The trail goes through the west side of the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve, roughly paralleling East Bush Lake Road until reaching the intersection of West 84th Street and Chalet Road. The Park District will recognize the existing trail segments of Subsegment A2 as part of the CPRRT. 11 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.160.02 Miles Existing trail segment Proposed trail segment CPRRT Alignment Map 8: Subsegment A1 Dred Scott Playfield A1Start A1End Minnesota R i v e r Crest AvenueBloomington Ferry RoadW Old Shakopee Road Mi n n e s o t a B l u f f s D r i v e W 110 th St Three Rivers Park District 30 The trail segments of Subsegment A2 outside of Hyland Park Reserve are owned, operated and maintained by the City of Bloomington. The trail segments within Hyland Park Reserve, including the underpass on East Bush Lake Road at 86th Street, are owned, operated and maintained by The Park District. The Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon for the trail crossing of Bush Lake Road (County Road 28) just north of Maryland Road, is owned and maintained by Hennepin County. Future operations, maintenance and improvements of this subsegment will remain the responsibility of the agency for their respective trail segment or facility. SUBSEGMENT A3 Subsegment A3 (0.64 miles) consists of a combination of existing and proposed trails. The subsegment is located along East Bush Lake Road between West 84th Street and the Bloomington/ Edina city limits at the intersection of East Bush Lake Road and West 78th Street (Map 10). From West 84th Street though the East Bush Lake Road/I-494 interchange, the existing trail largely meets he CPRRT design standards, including the portion of the trail that was reconstructed as part of the 2018 East Bush Lake Road interchange project. The existing trail segments of Subsegment A3 were built and are owned by Hennepin County. Under an agreement between Hennepin County and the City of Bloomington, the existing trails within County right-of-way are operated and maintained by the City of Bloomington. Future operations, maintenance and improvements of this subsegment will remain the responsibility of the City of Bloomington, with the exception of the infrastructure operations and maintenance of the MnDOT bridge over I-494. In the event that future improvements are planned, both agencies will work collaboratively, through a Partnership Agreement, to fund and complete the improvements, with each agency likely being responsible for the costs associated with their respective trail segment. The Park District will recognize the existing trail segments of Subsegment A3 as part of the CPRRT. North of the interchange, additional right-of-way is required to expand the existing 6’ sidewalk to a 10’ trail. At the intersection of West 78th Street, the existing northbound right turn slip lane will be eliminated to provide sufficient space to add the wider trail, as well as reducing motor vehicle speeds to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Trail users enjoy the scenic landscape of the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve in Subsegment A2 in Bloomington. The project team riding along an existing trail on the east side of East Bush Lake Road in Subsection A3 in Edina. Map 10: Subsegment A3 28 494494 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 0.035 0.07 0.105 0.140.0175 Miles Existing trail segment Proposed trail segment CPRRT Alignment A3End A3Start W 84 th Street CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 31 Project team evaluating CPRRT Subsegment A4 route options. 28 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.260.0325 Miles Existing trail segment Proposed trail segment CPRRT Alignment Map 11: Subsegment A4SUBSEGMENT A4 Subsegment A4 will connect Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina and will serve users looking to cross I-494 at East Bush Lake Road, providing key connections to job centers and regional parks in the area. Subsegment A4 (1.28 miles) will consist of a new trail from West 78th Street in Edina to the intersection with Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail underpass of West 70th Street (Map 11). Subsegment A4 will owned, operated and maintained by the Park District, along with potentially a partnership with the City of Edina for certain trail segments that are identified in the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. From West 78th Street to Dewey Hill Road, Subsegment A4 may follow the east side or west side of East Bush Lake Road. At this preliminary planning stage, it is assumed the trail will follow the east side of the road, which will require the installation of a traffic signal or an all-way stop at the intersection of Edina Industrial Boulevard and Bush Lake Road to facilitate a safe pedestrian and bicycle crossing. The cost estimates assume a traffic signal will be installed. A more detailed traffic engineering study is necessary to evaluate both alternatives and arrive at a preferred option. A potential alternative would be to route the trail along the west side of East Bush Lake Road; however, this alternative may present other safety/operational concerns with the southbound right turn slip lane at the intersection of West 78th Street and East Bush Lake Road. It would require the construction of a retaining wall to facilitate trail construction near West 78th Street. A final alignment will be determined at a later date after additional analysis is completed. The costs for both alternatives are likely to be similar. At Dewey Hill Road, the trail will turn west to connect to Cahill Road, across the Canadian Pacific Railway tracks. In preliminary conversations with Canadian Pacific, they indicated that to accommodate a trail crossing, the existing crossing surface would require widening and no major improvements to the warning devices at the crossing would be required. Continuing north along Cahill Road, additional right-of-way is required to accommodate the proposed trail (in lieu of reducing the width of Cahill Road, to avoid impacts to the current on- street bicycle lanes). The proposed trail continues north along Cahill Road to West 70th Street before turning east to connect to the existing Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail underpass. The City of Edina anticipates future redevelopment on the east side of Cahill Road near West 70th street. This could create an opportunity to route the CP Rail Regional Trail to a more direct connection to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail W 78th Stree t Bush Lake RoadCahill RoadDewey Hill Road W 70th Street Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Edina Industrial Boulevard Three Rivers Park District 32 SEGMENT A ROUTE MASTER PLANNING Segment A is divided into four subsegments - A1 through A4. The project team worked closely with staff from the cities of Edina and Bloomington to select a preferred route alignment for Subsegments A3 and A4 of the CPRRT in Edina and Bloomington. The four subsegments had different route planning processes which are described in the following sections. SUBSEGMENTS A1 & A2 Subsegments A1 and A2 are existing trails that travel through the City of Bloomington from the Minnesota River to West 84th Street. Both trail subsegments have been constructed to meet or exceed CPRRT trail design standards so no additional analysis was required. SUBSEGMENT A3 Subsegment A3 is a short, 0.6-mile trail alignment on the northern border of Bloomington along East Bush Lake from the I-494/MN-5 interchange to the 78th Street intersection in Edina. The alignment of Subsegment A3 was determined to be along East Bush Lake Road. The project team analyzed if the trail should be located on the east or west side of the road. The east side of East Bush Lake Road was chosen by the Project Team as the route alignment for the following reasons: • A 12’ wide sidewalk already exists on the east side of the I-494 bridge • Constructing a trail on the west side of East Bush Lake Road would mean a total reconstruction of the road and bridge • A 10’ wide sidewalk already exists south of the 494 bridge • MnDOT is reconstructing the I-494/MN-5 interchange and the design includes improvements to pedestrian ramps to accommodate a 10-foot-wide path on the east side • Right of way south of the I-494 bridge is limited SUBSEGMENT A4 Subsegment A4 is an 1.28-mile trail alignment starting at the southern border of Edina that stretches from the 78th Street and East Bush Lake intersection to 70th Street, connecting to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. From Bush Lake Road the trail route would cross I-494 and connect to the existing trail at West 84th Street that connects to Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve in Bloomington. The majority of the master planning focus was on this subsegment because it was the only missing trail segment of Segment A. The planning timeline for Subsegment A4 is shown in Figure 3. The Park District worked closely with staff from the cities of Edina and Bloomington to understand local municipality issues, coordinate with existing or planned projects and give agency staff opportunities to provide input on the CPRRT route. The local agency partners were engaged throughout the entire project process. The City of Edina and the City of Bloomington each hosted a project meeting and were involved in the decision- making process for determining the route alignments for Subsegments A3 and A4. City of Edina staff also participated in a route evaluation bike ride to analyze existing conditions of route options for Subsegment A4. A table with detailed results of the route evaluation bike ride is in Appendix D. Park District begins the CPRRT Master Plan and hires Toole Design Group to assist with Segment A public engagement, trail alignment evaluation and master plan development. The focus is on how to connect the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina with the Hyland-Bush- Anderson Lakes Park Reserve in Bloomington. 2017 The project team and local agency partners conducted a route evaluation ride along Subsegment A4 to evaluate existing conditions, opportunities and drawbacks of the three trail alignment options.August 2017July 2017Park District staff attend Edina Open Streets - a public event in Edina where the streets are open for walking and biking only - and gather public feedback on trail alignment options.September 2017Park District staff attend a workplace health fair near Subsegment A4 and gathered feedback about trail alignment options from employees who work in the area.January 2018Figure 3: Subsegment A4 Planning Timeline 2018 January 2018An online survey and online interactive mapping tool was developed to gather feedback from the public on their preferred route alternative. At the same time, a news release was developed and sent to local newspapers and TV stations. The project team and local agency partners review public engagement results and alignment options. Option C is selected as the preferred route alternative for Subsegment A4, which is a hybrid option between Option A and Option B.February 2018Fall 2017The project team went door-to-door at commercial businesses and residences near Subsegment A4 of the CPRRT to solicit feedback on trail alignment options. 2010 The CP Rail Regional Trail Feasibility Report was completed in June 2010. Park District began the study in November 2008. June 2010Project team members review a portion of Subsegment A4 on West 70th Street near the connection to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 33 Route Options The Project Team began by analyzing two route alignments - Option A and Option B. Route alignment preferences between Option A and Option B were very balanced, both from the public as well as from project staff. Each route had advantages and disadvantages identified (Table 14, page 34 and Map 13, page 35) but there was no clear preference. Since there was no clear preferred alignment for Subsegment A4, a hybrid alignment of Option A and Option B, Option C, was considered which incorporated the pros and cons of Options A and B. Each route was evaluated thoroughly by project staff and significant public engagement helped determine a preferred route. Descriptions for each alignment option are below. (Map 12) Option A Beginning at the intersection of East Bush Lake Road and 78th Street, Option A goes west along 78th Street over the railroad bridge to Cahill Road, north on Cahill Road up to 70th Street, then east to connect to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Option B Option B weaves through an industrial park area before connecting with Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail at Ohms Lane. Starting at East Bush Lake Road and 78th Street, Option B goes north along East Bush Lake Road to the intersection of Bush Lake Road and Edina Industrial Boulevard, continues north on Bush Lake Road up to 74th Street, east on 74th Street to Ohms Lane, then north on Ohms Lane to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Option C The hybrid option, or Option C, follows Option B on the southern portion of the subsegment and Option A on the northern portion of the subsegment. Beginning at the intersection of East Bush Lake Road and 78th Street, Option C follows East Bush Lake Road north to the intersection of Bush Lake Road and Industrial Boulevard, continues north on Bush Lake Road up to Dewey Hill Road, west on Dewey Hill Road to Cahill Road, north along Cahill Road to 70th Street, then east on 70th Street to connect to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. 77THFLEETWOODLARKSPUR TIFTON 70TH LON G BRA K E PICTURECAHILLLON G B RAKE LIMERICKDELANE Y HIGHWAY 100ABERC R O M B I E HIGHWAY 10070TH ST WTO NB HWY10078T H NORMANDALECHURCH LANHAM77TH STWTONB H W Y 1 0 0S B HWY100 TOEDINAINDUSTRIAL BLVD ASPASIA POP P Y DEWEY HILL DEWEYHILL TRILLI U M GLENROYRA BUNTARAKEMRICH AMUNDSON70THTRACY VIKINGNORM A N D A L ESHANNONDEWEY H I LL VILLAGE BUSH LAKE POND WOOD WBI494 TONB HWY100LEEVALLEY HIBISCUS NB HWY100TO 77TH STWCECILIA74THWESTON EDINA INDUSTRIAL LEWIS RIDGE OHMSLOCHMEREGLA S G O W72NDCOVENTRYBEST B UYSERVICE METRO73RD OAKGLEN 70TH ST W TO SB HWY100NB HWY100 TO70THST W 76TH Legend Alignment Option A Alignment Option B Alignment Option C Subsegment A3 Map 12: Subsegment A4 Route Options Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Three Rivers Park District 34 Public Engagement Since Subsegments A1-A3 are existing trails, public engagement for Segment A focused on Subsegment A4. The planning and public input process for selecting Subsegment A4, which connects the existing trail in Subsegment A3 to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, was very robust due to the many variables involved in selecting a route alignment. The process included analyzing three route alignment alternatives with involvement from local agency partners and community members. The route alignment alternatives for Subsegment A4 were determined by the Park District and were presented to the public to discuss. Several public outreach strategies were used to gather feedback from people who live or work near the project area. The team developed tailored strategies to include community members who may not be able to attend a traditional project open house due to work, family and child care obligations, transportation issues or other barriers. The following engagement strategies were used to garner public feedback: 1. A project website was developed and included information on the project background, project extents, and links to an online public survey and interactive map. 2. An online survey was developed to solicit feedback on the two proposed route options in Subsegment A4. The survey asked respondents which route options would have the most positive impact on biking or walking to various destinations such as school, work, retail or restaurants and for general exercise. The survey was posted from October 2017 to January 2018 and was available through direct and referral links to the project website. In total, the survey received 210 responses. Generally, participants were Figure 4: The online interactive map was used to gather feedback from the public about Subsegment A4 route options. supportive of the trail connection and there was not a clear preference for one alignment over another. Respondents also had the opportunity to describe why they prefer one alignment over the other; their verbatim responses are documented in Appendix D. 3. An online interactive map was developed to gather feedback from the public on their preferred route alternative using the platform WikiMap (Figure 4). The WikiMap displayed the alignment of the existing segments of the CPRRT in Bloomington as well as route options for Segment A4 in Edina. Wikimap respondents were encouraged to identify routes where they walk and bike and routes where they would walk or bike if the infrastructure was improved. Respondents were also able to identify specific points on the map where they think there are issues for biking or walking, or where they have an idea for an improvement. 4. A press release was developed and sent to local newspapers and cable TV stations. The press release included project background and project process information, web links to the online survey and online interactive map, as well as general information on Three Rivers Park District. 5. The Park District Facebook page was used to post information about the project and direct the public to the online survey and online interactive map. 6. A door-to-door engagement strategy was used to target specific residents, businesses and workers. The Project Team wanted to reach people that live or work near the future trail; therefore, Park District staff went door-to-door in neighborhoods surrounding the Subsegment A4 route location. CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 35 An activity board used to collect input from the public at Edina Open Streets. 7. Edina Open Streets, a public event in Edina where the streets are open for walking and biking only, was attended by Park District staff in September 2017. Park District staff spoke to dozens of people at the event and used an engagement activity board to gather public feedback on trail alignment options. More detailed event results are documented in Appendix D. 8. A local health fair was attended by project team members in January 2018 at BI Worldwide in Edina. BI Worldwide is located at 7700 Bush Lake Road in Edina and has over 500 employees in the CPRRT Subsegment A4 study area. The purpose of attending the event was to gather feedback on route alignment preferences from people who work in the area near the future trail. Three Rivers Park District 36 Route Selection The Project Team analyzed each of the options extensively, including examining several alignment characteristics of each route (Table 14) and various factors that influence trail construction cost estimates (Map 13, page 35). Park District staff and agency partners generally agreed that Option C was the preferred alignment and was ultimately selected as the proposed alignment for Subsegment A4. Option C has several advantages over Option A and B, including cost, directness, job access and coordination with local planning efforts. Option A was the most direct alignment, but requires the construction of a new bicycle and pedestrian bridge that parallels the existing bridge over the railroad. Option C was the second most direct alignment and does not require a costly bridge construction or retaining walls. A portion of Option C on Bush Lake Road and Dewey Hill Road is identified in the City of Edina’s DRAFT Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan as a recommended new shared use path. Neither Option A nor Option B is routed along the recommended new shared use path. The City of Edina is also undergoing a small area planning process near 70th Street, Amundson Avenue and Cahill Road, which is included in their 2018 Comprehensive Plan. Option C will benefit from future redevelopment that results from the small area planning process. Cost Estimate Analysis In addition to general trail construction costs, there are several physical challenge areas that will require special construction expenses and/or property acquisition costs for subsegment A4. These areas and associated cost estimates are illustrated in Appendix B – Physical Challenge Areas, which include: • 640’ of easement for trail construction along East Bush Lake Road/I-494 north ramp and West 78th Street - $20,480 • Traffic signal at East Bush Lake Road/Industrial Boulevard - $300,000 • Widening the existing railroad crossing surface on Dewey Hill Road - $125,000 (based on figures provided by CP Rail) • 2,650’ of easement along Cahill Road - $84,000 • Retaining wall along West 70th Street - $27,500 These costs are shown alongside general trail construction costs in Appendix C – Cost Estimates. CHARACTERISTIC OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C Approximate Length 1 mile 1.2 miles 1.3 miles Signalized Intersections 2 1 1 Driveway & Intersection Crossings (range varies depending on side of street) 18-27 20-22 22-23 Benefits to Pedestrians Sidewalks exist on Cahill Road and West 70th Street, but not on West 78th Street Greater benefit to pedestrians due to lack of existing sidewalks along route Sidewalks exist on Cahill Road and W 70th, but not on Bush Lake Road or Dewey Hill Road Number of Turns Along Route 2 3 4 Residential Access Adjacent to several residential developments along west side of Cahill Road None Adjacent to several residential developments along west side of Cahill Road Job Access Adjacent to several businesses on Cahill Road Adjacent to several businesses in the industrial park area on Bush Lake Road, 74th Street and Ohms Lane Adjacent to several businesses in industrial park area on Bush Lake Road, Dewey Hill Road and Cahill Road Major Cost Factors Requires new bike/pedestrian bridge over railroad on West 78th Street (~$525,000) Requires new signalized intersection at Bush Lake Road and Industrial Boulevard Requires new railroad crossing over Dewey Hill Road; Requires new signalized intersection at Bush Lake Road and Industrial Boulevard Estimated 2019 Engineering + Construction Administration Costs $420,000 $148,000 $325,000 Estimated 2019 Construction Costs $1,670,000 $592,000 $1,300,000 Estimated 2019 Total Costs $2,090,000 $740,000 $1,625,000 Table 14: Subsegment A4 Route Option Characteristics CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 37 Map 13: Subsegment A4 Alternatives Analysis Cost Estimate Assumptions *This map illustrates considerations that were included in the cost estimate for the alternatives analysis. It is not intended to serve as recommendations for the final trail design of Subsegment A4. Additional engineering analysis will be required to arrive at a final trail design. 0 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.260.0325 Miles Alignment Option A Alignment Option B Alignment Option C Narrow Dewey Hill Rd unstriped shoulders from 9’ to 7’ to move curb and drainage structures 4’ to provide 14’ for trail on north side Widen existing CP Railroad crossing to accommodate a 10’ trail. Based on discussions with the railroad, no signal improvements are included. Obtain 2’ easement from properties on east side of Cahill Road to provide 14’ for trail (Option A south of Dewey Hill Road; Options A and C north of Dewey Hill Road) Remove median and move curb 7’ to create space for trail on south side of West 70th Street Obtain 10’ easement from railroad on north side of West 78th Street from East Bush Lake Road to Cahill Road Retaining walls and bridge over railroad on north side of West 78th Street Trail on south side; Narrow outer lane from 14’ to 12’ and inner lane from 13’ to 11’ (incl gutter). Move drainage structures 4’ to provide 14’ for a trail Install traffic signal for crosswalk across west leg of intersection Narrow Bush Lake Rd unstriped shoulders from 9’ to 7’ to move curb and drainage structures 4’ to provide 14’ for a trail on the west side Narrow West 74th Street unstriped shoulders from 9’ to 7’ to move curb and drainage structures 4’ to provide 14’ for a trail on north side Narrow Ohms Lane travel lanes from 13’ to 11’ to move curb and drainage structures 4’ to provide 14’ for trail on west side Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail W 7 8 th Str e e t Bush Lake RoadCahill RoadDewey Hill Road W 70 th Street W 74 th Street Ohms Lane Three Rivers Park District38 0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25 Miles CP Rail Regional Trail Segment MLCCS Landcover Classifications within 1 Mile of Trail Artificial Surface (>95% Impervious) Cultural Vegetation Forest Wetland Shrubland Herbaceous Plants Open Water TRPD, ExistingTRPD, Non Existing, Approved Master Plan Search Corridor, Proposed, Met Council ApprovedSearch Corridor, Proposed, Park District Concept Other Agency, Non Existing Map 14: MLCCS | Segment A SEGMENT A LAND COVER AND NATURAL HERITAGE INFORMATION Segment A travels through landcover areas that are primarily classified as artificial surfaces. The three route alignment options analyzed for Subsegment A4 all travel through landcover areas classified as artificial surfaces. Therefore, the landcover classification had no implication on the route alignment selection for Subsegment A4. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System MnDNR’s Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) defines the land cover through Bloomington as a mix of forest, herbaceous plants, cultural vegetation, and open water ponds. The southern portion of the segment through Bloomington runs through a mix of artificial surfaces and cultural vegetation. The proposed trail segment connecting from Bloomington to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina is entirely on land classified as artificial surface. There are wetlands in the area—mainly near Highway 169, in a neighborhood west of Cahill Road, and along Nine Mile Creek. There are some small areas classified as shrubland that border wetlands. (Map 13). Natural Heritage Information System MnDNR’s Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) includes the following rare plants and animals, native plant communities, geologic features and/or animal aggregations within one-mile of Segment A: Actinonaias ligamentina (Mucket), Ammodramus henslowii (Henslow’s Sparrow), Pituophis catenifer (Gophersnake), Pleurobema coccineum (Round Pigtoe), and Tritogonia verrucose (Pistolgrip), none of which are anticipated to be negatively affected by the development of the CPRRT. 39CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan SEGMENT B OVERVIEW This 4.47-mile trail segment is located in the cities of Edina and St. Louis Park, spanning from Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in the south to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail in the north (Table 15 and Map 14). This segment is currently unplanned and will be planned in a future phase. Future planning work will include route evaluation, community engagement, and route selection. SEGMENT BNine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail Bicyclists overlooking the Mississippi River | Minneapolis, MN7 B Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN N ESOTA R I V E R NorthMississippiRegionalPark Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles Map 15: Segment B Context SEGMENT B | Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail #City Status Length Notes Acquisition & Construction Operations & Maintenance B1 B2 B3 B4 $3,120,903Subtotal4.47 miles Table 15: Segment B | Length and Cost (TBD) B Three Rivers Park District 40 This page left intentionally blank 41CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan SEGMENT C OVERVIEW This 1.68-mile trail segment is located in the City of St. Louis Park, spanning from Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail (Table 16 and Map 15). This segment is currently unplanned and will be planned in a future phase. Future planning work will include route evaluation, community engagement, and route selection. SEGMENT CCedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail Caption here | City name here, MN8 Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN N ESOTA R I V E RNorthMississippiRegionalPark Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles C Map 16: Segment C Context SEGMENT C | Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail #City Status Length Notes Acquisition & Construction Operations & Maintenance C1 C2 C3 C4 $xxSubtotal1.68 miles Table 16: Segment C | Length and Cost (TBD) Three Rivers Park District 42 This page left intentionally blank 43CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan SEGMENT D OVERVIEW This 2.12-mile trail segment is located in the cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, spanning from North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail (Table 17 and Map 16). This segment is currently unplanned and will be planned in a future phase. Future planning work will include route evaluation, community engagement, and route selection. SEGMENT DNorth Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail Dog bundled up for winter walking 9 Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN N E SOTA R I V E RNorthMississippiRegionalPark Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles D Map 17: Segment D Context SEGMENT D | North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail #City Status Length Notes Acquisition & Construction Operations & Maintenance D1 D2 D3 D4 $xx,xxx,xxSubtotal2.12 miles Table 17: Segment D | Length and Cost (TBD) Three Rivers Park District 44 This page left intentionally blank 45CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan SEGMENT E OVERVIEW This 2.7-mile trail segment is located in the cities of Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal, spanning from Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail (Table 18 and Map 17). This segment is currently unplanned and will be planned in a future phase. Future planning work will include route evaluation, community engagement, and route selection. SEGMENT ELuce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail Caption here | City name here, MN10 Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina M IN N ESOTA R I V E RNorthMississippiRegionalPark Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles E Map 18: Segment E Context SEGMENT E | Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail #City Status Length Notes Acquisition & Construction Operations & Maintenance E1 E2 E3 E4 $xx,xxx,xxSubtotal2.7 miles Table 18: Segment E | Length and Cost (TBD) Three Rivers Park District 46 This page left intentionally blank 47CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan SEGMENT F OVERVIEW This 2.66-mile trail segment is located in the cities of New Hope and Crystal, spanning from Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail (Table 19 and Map 18). This segment is currently unplanned and will be planned in a future phase. Future planning work will include route evaluation, community engagement, and route selection. SEGMENT FBassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail 11 Plymouth NewHope Crystal GoldenValley Minnetonka EdenPrairie Hopkins Richfield Woodland Greenwood SilverwoodPark FrenchRegional Park Hyland-Bush-AndersonLakes Park Reserve The Landing Bloomington Bryant LakeRegional Park Glen LakeGolf & Practice Center St.Louis Park Edina MIN N ESOT A R I V E RNorthMississippiRegionalPark Robbinsdale Minneapolis 0 1 2 3 4Miles F Map 19: Segment F Context SEGMENT F | Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail #City Status Length Notes Acquisition & Construction Operations & Maintenance F1 F2 F3 F4 $xx,xxx,xxSubtotal2.66 miles Table 19: Segment F | Length and Cost (TBD) The CPRRT travels along Bush Lake Road adjacent to the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MN Three Rivers Park District 48 This page left intentionally blank 49CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan The Park District’s Research and Evaluation Section provides visitation estimates for new regional trails. They are based on an estimating methodology, which treats each regional trail as a unique entity with its own set of specific characteristics. The projected annual visits are based on a fully-built, contiguous regional trail corridors. When fully constructed, the CPRRT is projected to generate 305,000 annual visits. This visitation estimate is calculated based on the following methodology: 1) Metropolitan Council’s annual estimated visits to a comparable regional trail (Luce Line Regional Trail) and 2) population within 1.5 miles of the regional trail. Table A-1 shows the methodology used to determine the annual visitation estimates. APPENDIX A VISITATION METHODOLOGY The CPRRT travels through the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MNA THE BOTTOM LINE key message theBL When fully constructed, the CPRRT is estimated to attract 305,000 annual visits. Annual Visits to Luce Line Regional Trail (Comparison trail to CPRRT) based on 2017 Metropolitan Council estimate 521,000 visits 50% of Annual Visits to Luce Line Regional Trail 260,500 visits Distance that 50% of visitors live from Luce Line Regional Trail (2014 TRPD Visitor Survey) *Assumption: 50% of CPRRT’s annual visits will be from residents that live within 1.5 miles 1.5 miles Population within 1.5 miles of Luce Line Regional Trail 88,076 people Average annual visits to Luce Line Regional Trail by people living within 1.5 miles 2.95 Visits (260,500 visits/88,076 residents) Population within 1.5 miles of CPRRT 51,439 people Projection for 50% of CPRRT’s Annual Visits 152,140 visits (2.95 visits/resident X 51,439 residents) Projected Annual Visits to CPRRT Approximately 305,000 visits (152,140 visits x 2) Table A- 1: Future Visitation Estimate Methodology Three Rivers Park District 50 This page left intentionally blank 51CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX B PHYSICAL CHALLENGE AREAS Regional trail user passes Level A wayfinding signage configuration.B Three Rivers Park District52 494494 28 78TH ST W 76TH ST W CAHILL RDBUSH LAKE RDA M E R I C A N BLVDWDELANEYBLVD PICTURE DREDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD GREEN VALLEY DRCECILIA CIRG LENROYRDG L A S G OW D R N OR MANCR E E K TRLBUSH LAKE RD E0 0.045 0.09 0.135 0.180.0225 Miles October 4, 2017 AR Existing trail segment Proposed trail segment Special Construction Easement Area BLOOMINGTON | SUBSEGMENT A3 Easement area 53CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 28CAHILL RD70TH ST W 78TH ST WBUSH LAKE RDO H M S L N 74TH ST W DELANEYBLVDLANHAM LN76TH ST W METRO BLVDDEWEY HILL RD EDINA INDUST R IA LBLVDFLEETWOOD DRABERCRO M B I E D R 73RD ST W KEMRICHDR L O NG B R A K E T RL 72ND ST W A MUNDSONAVECECILIA CIRG L A S G O W D RCOVENTRYWAYTARA RDLOCHMERE TERVILLAGE DR LEEVAL LEYCIRMETRO BLVDOAKGLENRD 0 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.260.0325 Miles October 4, 2017 AR Existing trail segment Proposed trail segment Special Construction Easement Area EDINA | SUBSEGMENT A4 Widen railroad crossing for trail 130’ retaining wall 300’ retaining wall Easement areas Traffic signal Three Rivers Park District 54 This page left intentionally blank 55CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX C COST ESTIMATES CThe CPRRT crosses Bush Lake Road near the Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve | Bloomington, MN Three Rivers Park District 56CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan Proposed Design Consideration(s)Rest Stops & Amenities Private Property Impacts Sub- segment Implementation Notes Miles Linear Feet Bituminous Cost Construct New Bituminous Reconstruct Substandard Bituminous Maintain Existing Bituminous Trailheads & Rest Stops Site Amenities & Signage Property Acquisition Temporary Easements Special Construction Total Subsegment Cost (rounded) S BLOOMINGTON & EDINAA1 • Maintenance on existing trail, including sealcoat/ striping ($7 LF) • (1) Level A Kiosk, (1) Level C Sign, update existing signs. 0.75 3,956 $27,692 ----X --$60,000 ------$90,000 A2 • Maintenance on existing trail, including sealcoat/ striping ($7 LF) • (1) Level B Kiosk, (2) Level C Signs 4.35 23,075 $161,525 ----X --$50,000 ------$210,000 A3 • Maintenance on existing trail, including sealcoat/ striping ($7 LF) • 640’ of easement and trail construction between E. Bush Lake Road/I-494 north ramp and W. 78th St. • (1) Level C Sign 0.64 3,290 $212,300 X ------$10,000 $20,480 ----$245,000 A4 • Traffic signal at E. Bush Lake Road/Industrial Blvd. - $250,000 • Wider crossing surface at CP Rail Crossing - $120,000 • 2,650’ of easement along Cahill Road • 528 SFF retaining wall along W. 70th St. (fill) - $52/SFF • (1) Level B Kiosk, (1) Level C Sign 1.28 6745 $2,192,125 X ------$40,000 $84,800 --$397,500 $2,715,000 APPENDIX C | SEGMENT A: Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail $3,260,000$397,500--$105,280$2,593,6427.02 --$160,000MASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE TOTALS 37,066 Three Rivers Park District 57CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX C | SEGMENT B: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail Proposed Design Consideration(s)Rest Stops & Amenities Private Property Impacts Sub- segment Implementation Notes Miles Linear Feet Bituminous Cost Construct New Bituminous Reconstruct Substandard Bituminous Maintain Existing Bituminous Trailheads & Rest Stops Site Amenities & Signage Property Acquisition Temporary Easements Special Construction Total Subsegment Cost (rounded)EDINA & ST. LOUIS PARKB1 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX B2 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX B3 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX B4 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $8,050,000$XX$XX$950,000$7,100,0004.47 $XX $XX--GENERALIZED COST ESTIMATE TOTALS Three Rivers Park District 58CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX C |SEGMENT C: Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail to North Cedar Lake Regional Trail Proposed Design Consideration(s)Rest Stops & Amenities Private Property Impacts Sub- segment Implementation Notes Miles Linear Feet Bituminous Cost Construct New Bituminous Reconstruct Substandard Bituminous Maintain Existing Bituminous Trailheads & Rest Stops Site Amenities & Signage Property Acquisition Temporary Easements Special Construction Total Subsegment Cost (rounded)ST. LOUIS PARKC1 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX C2 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX C3 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX C4 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $3,010,000$XX$XX$360,000$2,650,0001.68 $XX $XX--GENERALIZED COST ESTIMATE TOTALS Three Rivers Park District 59CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX C | SEGMENT D: North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to Luce Line Regional Trail Proposed Design Consideration(s)Rest Stops & Amenities Private Property Impacts Sub- segment Implementation Notes Miles Linear Feet Bituminous Cost Construct New Bituminous Reconstruct Substandard Bituminous Maintain Existing Bituminous Trailheads & Rest Stops Site Amenities & Signage Property Acquisition Temporary Easements Special Construction Total Subsegment Cost (rounded)ST. LOUIS PARK & GOLDEN VALLEYD1 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX D2 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX D3 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX D4 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $3,800,000$XX$XX$450,000$3,350,0002.12 $XX $XX--GENERALIZED COST ESTIMATE TOTALS Three Rivers Park District 60CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX C |SEGMENT E: Luce Line Regional Trail to Bassett Creek Regional Trail Proposed Design Consideration(s)Rest Stops & Amenities Private Property Impacts Sub- segment Implementation Notes Miles Linear Feet Bituminous Cost Construct New Bituminous Reconstruct Substandard Bituminous Maintain Existing Bituminous Trailheads & Rest Stops Site Amenities & Signage Property Acquisition Temporary Easements Special Construction Total Subsegment Cost (rounded)GOLDEN VALLEY, NEW HOPE & CRYSTALE1 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX E2 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX E3 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX E4 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $4,820,000$XX$XX$570,000$4,250,0002.7 $XX $XX--GENERALIZED COST ESTIMATE TOTALS Three Rivers Park District 61CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX C |SEGMENT F: Bassett Creek Regional Trail to Crystal Lake Regional Trail Proposed Design Consideration(s)Rest Stops & Amenities Private Property Impacts Sub- segment Implementation Notes Miles Linear Feet Bituminous Cost Construct New Bituminous Reconstruct Substandard Bituminous Maintain Existing Bituminous Trailheads & Rest Stops Site Amenities & Signage Property Acquisition Temporary Easements Special Construction Total Subsegment Cost (rounded)NEW HOPE & CRYSTALF1 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX F2 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX F3 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX F4 • XX • XX ----$XX ------$XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $XX $4,820,000$XX$XX$570,000$4,250,0002.66 $XX $XX--GENERALIZED COST ESTIMATE TOTALS Three Rivers Park District 62 This page left intentionally blank 63CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 0 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.260.0325 Miles Alignment Option A Alignment Option B Alignment Option C APPENDIX D - SEGMENT A PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS The Project Team utilized a number of different engagement strategies to gather feedback from members of the public and staff from the Cities of Edina and Bloomington on Subsegment A4 alignment options (Map D-1). Detailed engagement results from the online survey, route evaluation ride and Edina Open Streets event are provided in this section. ONLINE SURVEY An online survey was developed through Google Forms to solicit feedback on route Options A and B in Subsegment A4 of the CPRRT. The survey was posted from October 2017 to January 2018 and was available through direct and referral links through the project website and Three Rivers Park District Facebook page. The survey received 210 responses. Respondents views were fairly balanced on alignment preferences in general, as 52% chose Option A (110 responses) and 43% chose Option B (90 responses) and 5% had equal preference. If you had to choose Option A or Option B, which would it be? Project team members and agency partners participate in a route evaluation bike ride | Edina, MND 90 110 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Option B Option A Equal preference W 7 8 th Str e e t Bush Lake RoadCahill RoadDewey Hill Road W 70 th Street W 74 th Street Ohms LaneMap D-1: Subegment A4 Alignment Options Three Rivers Park District 64 The survey also asked respondents which route options would have the most positive impact on biking or walking to various destinations such as school, work, retail or restaurants and for general exercise. The charts below show survey responses in regards to walking or biking to specific destinations. Which route do you think would have more positive impact on biking to work? Which route do you think would have more positive impact on biking to school? Which route do you think would have more positive impact on biking to restaurants? Which route do you think would have more positive impact on biking for fun or exercise? 88 85 29 0 20 40 60 80 100 Option B Option A I can't decide. 48 67 77 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Option B Option A I can't decide. 99 77 22 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Option B Option A I can't decide. 73 115 15 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Option B Option A I can't decide. 65CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan Which route do you think would have more positive impact on walking to work? Which route do you think would have more positive impact on walking to school? Which route do you think would have more positive impact on walking to restaurants? Which route do you think would have more positive impact on walking for fun or exercise? 76 58 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Option B Option A I can't decide. 42 65 83 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Option B Option A I can't decide. 80 72 38 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Option B Option A I can't decide. 69 96 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Option B Option A I can't decide. Three Rivers Park District66 Survey respondents also had the opportunity to describe why they prefer one alignment over the other; their verbatim responses are documented below: Why did you choose Option A? • Less traffic than Bush Lake Road • More direct • A route thru an industrial park is not ideal. Going down Cahill and along Lewis Park is much prettier and attractive. • Less need to cross traffic • Far less traffic, more scenic • More direct route, less turns • Close to my work • Less winding, more inclusive of parks (on Cahill Rd) • I prefer Cahill Rd. because it is more residential and prettier. I also like that option A includes a path along the very scary, treacherous stretch on 78th St. The sidewalk on Cahill currently dumps you off at 78th with no options. With the curve, sight line problems and speeding by motorists is a scary problem in need of a solution. I also like it that the Cahill section is closer to Edina High & Valley View Schools. The current trail on 70th ends near Cahill and option A appears to close that gap. • Goes by retail and parks • Cahill is already a bike route. It is less industrial location • Less street crossings. • Possibly better views • There are retail businesses on Cahill but not Ohms Lane • Park is on option A, apartments are on option A so easy to get on the trail. Option B is all industrial. • Much better option away from vehicle traffic. • As a rider who likes to go fast, I would choose Option A. Also Option A is the in between mark where you can get to the school and/or workplace. Option B is nice for those who want to get around the business sites, however i think more users would like the more scenic route. • I work at Edina Industrial Blvd. & Bush Lake Road. When people would be biking to work or back home, that intersection is crazy busy, and I would expect it to be a danger to bikers and quite a complication for auto traffic. • Biking south on E Bush Lake Rd and trying to turn left onto Bush Lake Rd is dangerous. Cahill seems like the safer option and if you are trying to get into the industrial zone that option B goes through you can just turn east onto Dewey Hill Rd from Cahill. Basically, the car traffic on Edina Industrial Blvd makes Option B less desirable for pedestrians and cyclists. • It’s straight • Closer to Braemar facilities and less industrial traffic interference. • Option A is a nicer, more direct route. • Rather bike past nature and parks instead of commercial and industrial space. • More convenient for my work. • Supporting friends • The alignment is much better for the area • It is more accessible to residents. It provides better bike access to Lewis Park. • Very convenient to our home location • I come from the west • More direct, makes more sense • I prefer biking on Cahill, this has been a part of my commute for years • Despite the increased risk by drivers entering and exiting side streets and various parking lots, the Cahill route is much more efficient and direct. Out of the few thousand miles of commuting I’ve done in 2017 alone, I’ve chosen the Cahill route 9 out of 10 times. Thank you so much for evaluating this area and continuing to give the communities safe routes to work and school! • Long, straight road with good sightlines for drivers. While traffic is present on both routes, my experience is better with route A as it has lower overall traffic volume. Option A heading south requires one cross-traffic turn, but has a turn light. Option A heading north also only has one cross- traffic turn, again with a light. B includes several more and a turn-specific light is not always present. • Option A is more linear than option B, it also would have a slightly less industrial feel along that route. • I like the scenery along Cahill road better - the other area is pretty industrial, also it seems like a lot of turns. • Option A is a much easier, straightforward route that is not tucked away in a business park. There are not really any significant retail shops along route B that would benefit from a bike path through the area. • I live on the west side of town and work at QBP so the further west the route, the more likely I would be to use it. • It is the best choice • Commonly used if commuting to QBP. The roads are in rough condition for commuting. • Looks better for my commute and passes closer to some restaurants • I like the more direct route A through the neighborhood. Routing through the industrial park creates lots of driveways and businesses with distracted rush hour drivers. Route A also creates a safe corridor for cyclists moving north. Most important to me, whether the route is A or B, is a safe way through the Bush Lake, 78th intersection as currently it’s quite busy. • This is more direct, and provides better non-motorized access to Lewis park • More direct, clearer line of sight, less potential for conflict CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 67 with motorists. Only issue that exists is the crossover on 70th. I have no problem jumping the median when coming from the north, but I think many users would. I personally love this route and can’t wait for Google maps to update their bike route suggestion (I’m new to the area). • Easier to follow • More direct route to the trail • Riding through this southern part of Edina during rush hour can be dangerous. Taking the left from BLR/Edina Industrial Blvd is dangerous in a car, via bike it would be a death wish. While Cahill has dangerous points (Dewey Hill Rd intersection). The road is long and straight with good sight-lines. It also has a (mostly) good designated bike lane. The most ideal option would be convert and pave the railroad line running parallel. • Straighter, greener, away from industrial traffic • Direct, straight route, wide road with bike lanes. • In my view the trail will serve more people if it runs near commercial AND residential. • Walking or biking through that depressing industrial park is not fun for anyone. I’d like the path to serve the neighborhood community better, and ideally help link to the Cahill Shops (when redeveloped into a someplace that’s not a soul-sucking dumpster of buildings!). • Straight route that doesn’t wind through industrial area. Passes directly next to Lewis Park for convenient access. Limits time on busy, low-visibility Bush Lake Road. • More direct • Cahill Rd is straighter • Cahill is a lovely location and less industrial. • Likely a more aesthetically pleasing route rather than through warehouses... • That area is already so industrial and I think this would be a nice way to add green space to an otherwise ugly area. Having Lewis Park directly across the street would also be really nice to tie the two spaces together! • There is currently not a good path to get to to the Cahill and 70th restaurants and retail and this would provide a safe, designated space. • Cahill is straight, near Lewis Park, attractive, and seems safer • The other option (B) weaves people through an industrial park. The scenery and environment is not all that appealing. Option A allows for a more scenic path as well as stops at Lewis Park. • More visually appealing to go on Cahill and near Lewis park • Near housing and I would feel safer because of auto traffic passing by • Safest and most pleasant route • Most direct route....no turns • I currently bike on Cahill and enjoy it.. it even currently has a bike lane. Granted, I’ve never taken Option B, so take that with a grain of salt. • More direct. Better connection point from the north. • Less turning, easier to follow... • Looks like it would be shorter, so I could get to Hyland park faster--I wouldn’t necessarily take this trail with the purpose of going to retail/restaurants along the route, I would take it in order to have a safe way to get to Hyland. • Straighter • Seems the most straightforward • Safer / less traffic • I ride on Cahill now very often and it’s a nice, straight, flat route. Option is a very direct route that would be easy to follow. Option B has quite a few turns and people could become confused. • A is not through congested, low visibility industrial area • Shortest distance in a boring area. • More direct • The more scenic, less industrial or “built up the better whether for commuting or pleasure. • Provides access to park area in Edina- it is also a somewhat less industrial route • More scenic than warehouses. • Less turns makes it safer • Option A is more unbending and linear and Option B takes many different turns and is therefore less efficient. • The whole route should be along the CP Rail line • More straightforward • Option B is the route I drive to work but I think option A would be used more by bikers and walkers. • More direct, less turns and industrial but must be wide enough and safe on Cahill • Most direct route and does not go through so much industrial/commercial area. This option could be screened with landscaping from the residential and commercial properties adjacent, protecting both from unwanted noise and views. • Less traffic on that route • Straightest, easiest, fairly good road. • Location provides for easier access to retail space, school, parks, etc. • Option A would be a better choice due to the nicer scenery. It would also make it easier for people to access Lewis Park and there are less corners and turns compared to option B • It looks more scenic • Far less traffic and cars • Biking to work at Norman Lake Center • While I don’t live in this area, I can see that option A goes Three Rivers Park District 68 through a residential area and would provide for a good corridor for traveling throughout the neighborhood and into the bordering retail area. I also believe that this trail would be more useful and productive than one that goes through what appears to be an industrial or commercial area. • Cahill road is the most direct • Cahill road is shaded • I like Cahill but either route would be fine Why did you choose Option B? • It seems more direct and is shorter. • Nicer scenery because of the additional Nine Mile Creek Trail routing. • Makes a direct connection to my place of work. • It would better serve the many jobs in the Edina Industrial Park • Safer roads • Less traffic? • It works great for my personal use and I see a lot of people walking on the Ohm and the traffic gets very busy as times. I believe families would use option B to get to Hyland also! • It’s away from my house • Less traffic • More people would use it because streets are quieter and it avoids the 70th/Cahill hill. I do like the Option A connection to Lewis Park, though. Both are good, but both also cross the hairy 78th/Bush Lake Road intersection. That’s the hard part • Many people enjoy walking over lunch in the industrial park. Currently it is not very pedestrian-friendly, and Option B would really help. • Because it passes my work and a few restaurant options. • I work on Option B • There is a brewery & taproom opening soon right on the option B route at Bush Lake Road and 74th. This would make it easier and safer to bike there. • Covers more ground within the area. • Convenient • Near things I’d want to visit • More would be accessible • Option B goes by Wooden Hill Brewing Company and then goes right by my work. Perfect! • Work in the industrial park that option b runs through • Close to work • Cahill is too busy of a street to accommodate a bike path and option B will link to the brewery and go near the ice arena • Seems to make the most sense with current trails in place • Better access to retail and other parks from where I live • Access • Live by • For all the above reasons. • Connects to everything and has less major intersections making it safer for bikers • Because it ties the residential part of the area into the commercial part. It shows off more of the community. Makes it feel a lot more like Northeast Minneapolis in that sense that there is access by foot, bike, and car to all of the local businesses. Would bring much needed vibrancy to an otherwise small-scale stale area. • It would lead to my workplace from the south • I just like to use that route • This is the route I ride on my way to work - I work at QBP • Closer to my church so we could bike to church from home. • Closer to my point of entry onto the path • I live in South Minneapolis so this route is more direct. • This is already the route I use for biking to work at QBP from SW Mpls • Proximity to where I live • Safer on a bike • This is the more direct route between my home (South Minneapolis) and my work in West Bloomington. • Would be more direct if I came through this corridor headed to/from Hyland park • Side streets • Job location • I bike through this area in a regular basis and B is the typical direction I go. It has a good flow to it. • Option B provides better connection from east. Plus with bike lanes already on Cahill could add bike lanes to 78th to provide Option A connection for commuter cyclists. The two are very close in positive impact. Option A likely slightly more pleasant experience especially for walking. However, Option B is the better overall route connecting from north and east. And perhaps in future Ohms Lane area redevelops to provide better commercial, restaurants, public space, housing, business, etc opportunities. • Most accessible • Closer to my house • Preferred route from my location to Hyland. • Less traffic, less hilly • I am more likely to use the path for fun/exercise than other purposes • Cahill is pretty but it is long and flat, with traffic that goes much faster CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 69 • The Cahill-78th street intersection scares me as a cyclist. • More directional variety • Cahill is a very busy road, I’d be concerned with interacting with traffic, especially at the intersection of Cahill and 70th • No sidewalk there, would be nice to have to walk from BI to retail • Closer to my work! • I bike near hear often - Option B just makes more sense • Passes by my workplace • More convenient to more business and school traffic. In addition, I would use this option more. • It would open up a safe route to my workplace. • While option A might offer a more tranquil route, Option B offers closer access to restaurants/a coffee shop. Either Option, though, will be welcomed and I will cycle it frequently. • I would prefer biking on a route that is not along a busy car route as on Cahill. • More scenic, less traffic Three Rivers Park District 70 Category Criteria Option A: Cahill Road Option B: Industrial Park Notes A or B?Safety and ComfortSight lines Route evaluation ride participants generally agreed the sight lines were good along this route Route evaluation ride participants generally agreed the sight lines were good along this route Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Trees/shade Route evaluation ride participants generally agreed there was good tree shade along this route Route evaluation ride participants generally agreed there was moderately good tree shade along this route Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride # of driveway/ intersections 18-27 20-22 Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride and the count depends on side of street for each option Complexity of driveway/ intersections Bush Lake Road at 78th Street needs adjustment to signal timing and configuration; Cahill at 78th Street is constrained and includes turning movements and a lot of traffic Bush Lake Road at 78th needs signal timing adjustments; Bush Lake Road is unsignalized as it jogs east then north and would need some improvements Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Directness 3-4 turning movements between the I-494 bridge and the trail entrance on 70th Street 3 turning movements between the I-494 bridge and the trail entrance on 72nd Street Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride SUBSEGMENT A4 ROUTE EVALUATION RIDE On August 23, 2017, project team members from the Park District, Toole Design Group and the City of Edina conducted a route evaluation bike ride to analyze Option A and Option B in Subsegment A4 of the CPRRT. Aerial maps and property line data was referenced during the analysis and route alignment notes were recorded. During the bike ride the group stopped at various points along the route to discuss criteria for a regional trail, including implementation feasibility, community connectivity, safety and comfort, anticipated trail users and existing guidance from other local plans. Table D-1 on the following pages displays notes from the ride that evaluated route Option A and Option B against various criteria. Table D-1: Subsegment A4 Options A and B route alignment evaluation CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 71 Category Criteria Option A: Cahill Road Option B: Industrial Park Notes A or B?Implementation FeasibilityROW constraints/ opportunities Likely more resistance to getting rid of bicycle lanes to make up space for a trail; Needs more analysis (parcel data) Needs more analysis (parcel data) As for changes to existing bicycle infrastructure, participants in the route evaluation ride indicate a higher likelihood of resistance to removing bicycle lanes on Cahill (Option A) B, but needs more analysis of ROW Requires redesign of major intersection(s) Two intersections: Bush Lake Road/78th Street and Cahill/78th Street Two intersections: Bush Lake Road/78th Street and Bush Lake Road/ Edina Industrial Boulevard Based on the route evaluation ride, it appears Bush Lake Road/78th Street has more room for addressing intersection redesign, but further analysis would be needed; Cahill Road/78th Street is constrained because of the bridge Likely B, but needs further analysis of intersections Requires redesign of bridge(s) Two: Bush Lake Road/I-494 and 78th/railroad One: Bush Lake Road/I-494 Bush Lake Road/I-494 bridge will require some adjustments for both options; The bridge at 78th Street over the RR/ industrial area would need more ROW for a trail; Vehicular traffic is at capacity according to the City of Edina, so reallocating existing space is not feasible Likely B. A new trail bridge over the railroad is possible, but very expensive Utilities in the way Most utilities near the roadway edge on the east side of Cahill Road Fewer utilities than Option A Based on the route evaluation ride, it appears Option A has more utilities and that they are located closer to the roadway than Option B, but further analysis would be needed to confirm B, but needs further analysis to confirm Number of street crossings (controlled) 3-4 depending on side of street 1-2 depending on side of street Difficult to assess without assuming side of street B, but depends on configuration Number of street crossings controlled) 1-2 depending on side of street 2-4 depending on side of street Difficult to assess without assuming side of street A, but depends on configuration Existing lighting/ opportunity for good lighting Not noted on route evaluation ride Not noted on route evaluation ride Needs further observation School bus, industrial vehicle conflicts Likely fewer heavy vehicles than the industrial park area Likely heavier truck traffic due to industrial land use Based on land use, likely more potential for heavy vehicle presence in Option B, but further analysis needed to quantify the difference A, but needs further analysis Three Rivers Park District 72 Category Criteria Option A: Cahill Road Option B: Industrial Park Notes A or B?Community ConnectivityConnects people to parks Soccer field Trail connection to the east Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Connects residential Connects to residential area west of Cahill Road Connects to some residential, but less directly than Option A A Improves walking opportunity Existing sidewalk along Cahill Road; Sidewalk between trailhead on 70th Street and Cahill Road has a gap and a desire line (worn “goat path”) on the south side of 70th Street Many sidewalk gaps; Observed pedestrian walking in a bike lane There is greater potential to increase walking trips in Option B because of the sidewalk gaps; The gap in Option A was relatively short Likely B Serves lower income residents Anecdotally during the route evaluation ride it was noted A is closer to middle income housing; Needs further analysis (look at Census data) Anecdotally during the route evaluation ride it was noted B is closer to low income housing; Needs further analysis (look at Census data) Possibly B, but needs further analysis More likely to serve interested- but-concerned riders Soccer field nearby indicates families and kids as potential users Anecdotally during the route evaluation ride it was noted B would capture more "interested-but- concerned" bicyclists Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Connects schools Anecdotally during the route evaluation ride it was noted A would connect with high schools Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Connects people to jobs Connects commute trips (north/south) Currently popular QBP commuter route; Traverses a job center Option B Improves commuter connections Connects commute trips currently (north/south); Already has bike lanes, people would likely be resistant to getting rid of bicycle lanes even if a trail replaced them Currently popular QBP commuter route; Connects to office an industrial jobs; Already has some bike lanes Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan 73 Category Criteria Option A: Cahill Road Option B: Industrial Park Notes A or B?Community Connectivity (continued)Benefits commuters from the north (South Minneapolis) Route evaluation ride participants indicated B would be a better connection for South Minneapolis commuters than A B Benefits commuters from the east Route evaluation ride participants indicated B would be "less inconvenient" for riders to the west than A would be for riders to the east B Benefits commuters from the west Route evaluation ride participants indicated B would be "less inconvenient" for riders to the west than A would be for riders to the east A Complements transit routes Transit routes observed along Cahill Road Transit routes observed in industrial park These observations are based on the route evaluation ride, further analysis would provide more information about transit routes and connections Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Category Criteria Option A: Cahill Road Option B: Industrial Park Notes A or B?Anticipated UsersConnects people to jobs Likely connects commute trips (north/south) Currently popular QBP commuter route; Traverses a job center Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Improves commuter connections Likely connects commute trips currently (north/ south); Already has bike lanes, people would likely be resistant to getting rid of bicycle lanes even if a trail replaced them Currently popular QBP commuter route; Connects to office an industrial jobs; Already has some bike lanes Inconclusive based on route evaluation ride Three Rivers Park District 74 Category Criteria Option A: Cahill Road Option B: Industrial Park Notes A or B?Plan GuidanceOpportunity to be integrated in other planning effort Option A falls within Small Area Plan zone for City of Edina A Referenced in Metropolitan Council RBTN RBTN alignment indicates north of I-494 the alignment continues on Bush Lake Road until it meets Edina Industrial, then terminates at Metro Boulevard; Neither alignment (A or B) takes this path, but Route B aligns with it more than A does; Both options (A and B) fall within the Tier 1 Corridor search area RBTN alignment indicates north of I-494 the alignment continues on Bush Lake Road until it meets Edina Industrial, then terminates at Metro Boulevard; Neither alignment (A or B) takes this path, but Route B aligns with it more than A does; Both options (A and B) fall within the Tier 1 Corridor search area. Referenced in Edina Bicycle Plan The plan does not identify a particular alignment for the connection, but it does indicate the general southern terminus at 70th Street and Cahill Road The plan does not identify a particular alignment for the connection, but it does indicate the general southern terminus at 70th Street and Cahill Road Referenced in Bloomington Active Transportation Plan There is a desire line identified north of Bush Lake Road, heading directly north, but no specific alignment is identified for that segment There is a desire line identified north of Bush Lake Road, heading directly north, but no specific alignment is identified for that segment 75CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan EDINA OPEN STREETS Project team members attended Edina Open Streets in September 2017, a public event in Edina where the streets are open for walking and biking and a variety of businesses and vendors set up booths in the street. Project team members gathered public feedback on an activity board, including trail alignment preferences and respondents’ relationship with the study area. The results of trail alignment preferences are below: • Option A: 18 • Option B: 5 • Equal Preference: 8 Staff also documented comments that people made in individual conversations. Respondents that prefer Option A made the following comments: • Cahill road is the most direct • Cahill road is shaded • I like Cahill but either route would be fine Respondents that prefer Option B made the following comments: • I don’t want anything to happen to Cahill road - no construction • The intersection of Bush Lake Rd and 78th is bad for cyclists • Cahill has a lot of traffic • Ohms Lane is right by my office An engagement activity board used by project staff to gather public input at Edina Open Streets. Three Rivers Park District 76 This page left intentionally blank 77CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan APPENDIX E RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT E CP Rail Regional Trail Master Plan Update CP Rail Regional Trail •21-mile trail corridor, divided into six segments •Master Plan amendments for each segments over time as opportunities arise •Focus on Segment A engagement and route analysis Segment A Recommended Route 7.0 miles from Minnesota River to Nine Mile Creek RT •5.7 miles existing trail in Bloomington, including through Hyland Bush- Anderson Lakes Park Reserve •1.3 miles new trail in Edina $2,735,000 for construction (TRPD Responsibility) Segment A Planning Background Focused on gap between Hyland Park Reserve and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Public Engagement •Extensive door-to-door engagement •Project website •On-line survey •Interactive map tool •Social media posts •Press releases Route Analysis •Three routes were thoroughly analyzed •Consideration: cost, funding potential, directness, residential access, job access, coordination with local planning efforts and public engagement feedback Segment A Options Through Edina •Three routes were thoroughly analyzed •Option C is recommended based on cost, public input, and future local investments CPRRT Master Plan: Next Steps……. Segment A April-May: 30-day public comment period & municipal resolutions of support May- July: Met Council review & approval August: Final Board master plan approval 2023-2024: Design & Construction (pending federal funding) Segment B Master Plan Kick Off: Late Summer 2020 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for O'Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve new On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for O'Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen, 6364 John Harris Drive #100, Edina. INTRODUCTION: See attached Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Liquor Licenses for O'Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen Lt. D. Conboy Background Investigation Summary May 7, 2019 Mayor and Council Sharon Allison, City Clerk PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen Information / Background: O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen, 6364 John Harris Drive, applied for new On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses. The Council must conduct a public hearing as required by City Code for this request. You may recall that last June, liquor licenses were issued to O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen, 6364 John Harris Drive. In February 2019, O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen, was sold to Lancer Food Holdings, LLC, and Lancer has retained the name O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen. Red River Kitchen will continue to operate in the Braemar Golf Course Club House at 6364 John Harris Drive, Suite 100. The administration and planning departments reviewed the application and finds that they comply with code requirements. The health department is satisfied with the applicant’s plan for storage and service. A background investigation was completed by the police department and Lt. Conboy’s findings are attached. Staff recommends approval of the liquor licenses. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR AND SUNDAY SALE LICENSES Establishment: O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen License: Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale In April 2019, the Edina Police Department began a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale licenses. The application was submitted by O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen. O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen will operate from 6364 John Harris Drive #100, Edina. O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training. The training has been completed. Owners/Partners/Members: O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen: Culinan, Keith Plymouth, MA Schreck, Robert Cornelius, NC Hennecy, Julie Charlotte, NC The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent, O'Reilly Custom 4 LLC, DBA Red River Kitchen from obtaining an Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale licenses. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-32 White Oaks C Street Reconstruction Reassessment Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2019-32 White Oaks C Street Reconstruction Reassessment. INTRODUCTION: See attached documents. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: White Oaks C Reassessment Resolution No. 2019-32: White Oaks C Reassessment Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law Assessment Roll Project Area Map Certificate of Mailing Staff Presentation: White Oaks C Assessment Hearing May 7, 2019 Mayor and City Council Chad A. Millner PE, Director of Engineering, PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-32 White Oaks C Street Reconstruction Reassessment Information / Background: The City completed a neighborhood roadway reconstruction project in the White Oaks Neighborhood in 2016. The Council approved the project and preliminary assessments Dec. 8, 2015 and the final assessments Oct. 3, 2017. The preliminary assessment was $26,700 per residential equivalent unit (REU). The final assessment was $24,858.85 per REU, levied against 18 properties. Six of the 18 property owners appealed the assessment in writing before the close of the final assessment hearing. After the Council approved the assessments, those property owners appealed to District Court. During court proceedings in 2018, their appraiser testified that there was not a market value benefit to the properties as result of the street reconstruction. The City’s 3rd party appraiser testified using three different methods that the benefit was $21,000 per REU following the street reconstruction. The Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Remand for Reassessment supported the City Appraiser’s market benefit analysis of $21,000 and ordered the special assessments at issue to be set aside and remanded to the Edina City Council for reassessment. The plaintiffs’ motion to add attorney’s fees was denied. The City will follow Minnesota State Statute 429 and reassess the six properties May 7, 2019. The assessment amount will be $21,000. Any payments previously made by the property owners will be refunded to them. No change in assessment will be considered for the 12 remaining properties. If the City were to do so, it might set a precedent that if one person successfully appeals an assessment, the City may have to reassess an entire neighborhood. The City is confident in its Special Assessment Policy, but recognizes the growing expense of repairing Edina’s aging infrastructure. The City will continue to evaluate alternatives. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-32 RESOLUTION APPROVING REASSESSMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council (“Council”) has met, heard and passed upon all objections to the reassessment for White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction – Improvement No. BA-438 (“Project”); and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2017, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2017-97 adopting special assessments for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Project included construction of roadways including improvement of the subsurface base beneath the roadways and new bituminous pavement on the surface of the roadways. WHEREAS, Jase and Sarah Wagner are the owners of property located at 4619 Townes Circle, Edina, Minnesota, with Hennepin County PIN 18-028-24-11-0022 (“Wagner Property”); and WHEREAS, Amy and Theodore Stark are the owners of property located at 4621 Townes Circle, Edina, Minnesota, with Hennepin County PIN 18-028-24-11-0023 (“Stark Property”); and WHEREAS, Susan and David Graham are the owners of property located at 4700 Townes Circle, Edina, Minnesota, with Hennepin County PIN 18-028-24-11-0092 (“Graham Property”); and WHEREAS, John Schuetzle and Heather Wallace are the owners of property located at 4701 Townes Circle, Edina, Minnesota, with Hennepin County PIN 18-028-24-11-0024 (“Schuetzle/Wallace Property”); and WHEREAS, Janene and John Augustine are the owners of property located at 4703 Townes Circle, Edina, Minnesota, with Hennepin County PIN 18-028-24-11-0076 (“Augustine Property”); and WHEREAS, Patrick and Heidi Judge are the owners of property located at 4707 Townes Circle, Edina, Minnesota, with Hennepin County PIN 18-028-24-11-0030 (“Judge Property”); WHEREAS, the Wagner Property, Stark Property, Graham Property, Schuetzle/Wallace Property, Augustine Property, and Judge Property, were each assessed $24,858.85 pursuant to Resolution No. 2017-97. WHEREAS, on October 24, 2017, the above-referenced parties filed a Notice of Appeal of Assessment with Hennepin County District Court (Court File No. 27-CV-17-16306) objecting to the City’s assessment of $24,858.85 against each property. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 429.071, Subd. 2, provides that, in the event that an assessment is set aside by a court, the council may, upon notice and hearing as provided for the original assessment, make a reassessment as to such parcels; and WHEREAS, a District Court Order dated February 19, 2019 ordered the special assessments in the case be set aside and remanded to the Edina City Council for reassessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Wagner Property, Stark Property, Graham Property, Schuetzle/Wallace Property, Augustine Property, and Judge Property, shall each be issued a refund from the City for assessments and interest paid pursuant to Resolution No. 2017-97. 2. The Council approves and adopts the reassessment of the Wagner Property, Stark Property, Graham Property, Schuetzle/Wallace Property, Augustine Property, and Judge Property, in the amount of $21,000.00 each. Said reassessment shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvements in the amount of the reassessment levied against it. 3. Such reassessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen (15) years, and shall bear interest at the rate of 3.25 percent per annum from the date of adoption of this resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of adoption of this resolution until December 31, 2020. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one (1) year on all unpaid installments. 4. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid. The property owner may, at any time prior to certification of the reassessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the reassessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire reassessment is paid before November 22 following the adoption of this resolution and the owner may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the reassessment remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 22, 2019. 5. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this reassessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County and such reassessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. County Levy Number 20222. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _________________, 2019 by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 2019, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Jase and Sarah Wagner, Amy and Theodore Stark, Susan and David Graham, John Schuetzle and Heather Court File No. 27-CV-17-16306 Wallace, Jenene and John Augustine and Patrick and Heidi Judge, Plaintiffs FINDINGS OF FACT, v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND REMAND FOR REASSESSMENT City of Edina, Defendant The above-entitled matter came on before the Honorable M. Jacqueline Regis, Judge of District Court, for a Court Trial beginning on November 13, 2018 and concluding on November 15, 2018. Following the trial, Plaintiffs renewed their motion to amend and add a claim for attorney fees under 42 USC §1983. John Hoeschler, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. David Kendall, Esq. appeared representing Defendant City of Edina. Based on all the files, records and proceedings herein, together with the arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Plaintiffs are the owners of six properties (“Properties”) in the White Oaks C neighborhood (“White Oaks neighborhood”) in the City of Edina (“Edina”), Minnesota. 2. The roadways in the White Oaks neighborhood consist of Townes Circle and Townes Road and were constructed in the 1950s. Since then, Edina has maintained, but has not fully reconstructed, the roadways in the White Oaks neighborhood. 3. Approximately every four years, Edina reviews and rates street conditions. Edina uses a pavement condition index (“PCI”) to rate the condition of its streets. Using the PCI, roads in 2 Edina are rated on a scale between 0 and 100. A road with a PCI of 65 or greater is in good condition. A road with a PCI between 45 and 65 requires maintenance. Maintenance of a road can include a “mill and overlay” (“overlay”) which consists of removing and replacing approximately 1.5 inches of the top layer of the roadway. A typical overlay extends the life of the roadway approximately 10 to 15 years. A road with a PCI less than 45 is in poor shape and requires more extensive repair. 4. In or around 2011, the PCI for the roads in the White Oaks neighborhood was an 11. At that time, an overlay was no longer appropriate to maintain the roads in the White Oaks neighborhood. 5. In preparing for street improvement projects, Edina develops plans approximately five years before the planned improvement. In or around 2012, Edina began plans for a street improvement project in the White Oaks neighborhood and the neighboring Morningside neighborhood (“Project”). Edina initially planned that the Project would occur in 2017. 6. In 2012, the pavement in the White Oaks neighborhood was failing. To prevent plows from inadvertently gouging chunks of bituminous from the failing roadways, Edina street maintenance crews applied a thin overlay patch, or skim patch (“patch”) along Townes Road. 7. The patch applied to Townes Road improved the appearance of that roadway. The patch, however, was designed to be a temporary solution. Overlay patches have an expected life span of approximately three to four years. The patch did not address the underlying condition of Townes Road, which remained in poor condition. 8. Edina did not assess neighboring properties when maintenance crews applied the patch to Townes Road. The Edina maintenance department funded the application of the patch out of Edina’s general maintenance funds. 9. In 2015, the pavement surface in the White Oaks neighborhood was at the end of its useful life. It was no longer feasible for Edina to apply either an overlay or patch to the roadways in the White Oaks neighborhood. 10. On November 6, 2015, the Edina City Council received an Engineering Study stating that the Project was necessary, cost effective, and feasible. 11. Chad Millner, the engineer for Edina, testified credibly regarding the results of the soil boring tests, the poor condition of the roads in the White Oaks neighborhood, and the need for the Project. 12. Photographs taken of Townes Circle and Townes Road, before and after the patch, credibly support Mr. Millner’s testimony and the finding of the Edina City Council that the Project was necessary. 13. The Project included reconstruction of roadways in the White Oaks neighborhood and the neighboring Morningside neighborhood in Edina. In addition to roadway reconstruction, the 3 Project included new curbs and gutters, and an upgrade to the utility infrastructure in the White Oaks and Morningside neighborhoods in Edina. 14. Although originally planned to begin in 2017, the Project completion date was moved up to 2016 given the poor road conditions in the White Oaks neighborhood. 15. On October 3, 2017, the Edina City Council levied special assessments against the properties in the White Oaks and Morningside neighborhoods to help fund the street reconstruction work. In making these assessments, the Edina City Council found that the properties in the White Oaks and Morningside neighborhoods were benefited by the road construction in the amount of special assessment levied against it. 16. There is a wetlands owned by Edina in a portion of the Morningside and White Oaks neighborhood. Mr. Millner testified credibly that these wetlands were not assessed because Edina does not assess property which cannot be developed. 17. Property owners in the White Oaks and Morningside neighborhoods were only assessed the cost of the street construction portion of the Project. Edina used other funds to pay for utility upgrades, curbs and gutters. 18. When determining whether to asses a homeowner for a road construction project, Edina first classifies the street based on its use. Edina uses gas tax aid to repair major arteries and local connector streets. For any improvements to local roads, Edina assesses the neighboring property owners who primarily use those streets. 19. Edina determined that the roadways in both the Morningside and White Oaks neighborhoods in Edina are local roads and the neighboring property owners are subject to assessment. 20. In determining the amount of the assessment, Edina uses residential equivalent units or REUs. REUs are based on the size of a lot. Mr. Millner, in testimony that was not contradicted, stated credibly that a unit assessment is a valid methodology for fairly determining the amount of assessments. 21. The cost of the road reconstruction portion of the Project was $1,030,722.28 for the Morningside neighborhood and $445,028.54 for the White Oaks neighborhood. 22. The average home value in the Morningside neighborhood is approximately $400,000.00. Edina divided the road reconstruction costs among the approximately 90 properties in the Morningside neighborhood and assessed each property the amount of $8,184.56 or approximately 2% of the average home value. 23. The average home value in the White Oaks neighborhood is approximately $1.5 million. Edina divided the road reconstruction costs among the approximately 18 properties in the White Oaks neighborhood and assessed each property the amount of $24,858.851, or between 1 In addition to the road reconstruction costs, the $24,858.85 that Edina assessed to each property in the White Oaks neighborhood includes $135.04 for streetlights. 4 1% and 2% of the average home value. 24. Plaintiffs, as owners of the Properties, objected to the special assessments and filed a “Notice of Appeal and Appeal” (“Appeal”) pursuant to Minnesota Statute §429.081. According to the Appeal, Plaintiffs deny that the road reconstruction portion of the Project conferred any “special benefit” to the Properties. To the extent that the assessments exceeded any special benefit, Plaintiffs contend that the assessment “constitutes an unconstitutional taking without due process.” In the Appeal, Plaintiffs requested an order requiring the Defendant to refund, “with interest and costs, any such excess and non- uniform/proportional portion of the assessment.” 25. Plaintiffs Patrick and Heidi Judge purchased one of the Properties from Arlene Wilson after this appeal was filed.2 Patrick Judge testified that he saw absolutely no benefit to a new road. The Judges, however, paid the full purchase price for the property and additionally agreed to pay the full $24,858.85 assessment. In return, Wilson assigned her interest in the Appeal to the Judges. Patrick Judge testified that his desire to purchase the Property exceeded the full purchase price plus the assessment. 26. Mark Brown and Ethan Waytas are appraisers retained by Plaintiffs and Defendant respectively. Unlike a financial appraisal, the purpose of an appraisal in a special assessment appeal is to determine the fair market value of property before and after the improvement. Both appraisers testified that “fair market value” is defined as “the price that a typically motivated buyer would pay to a typically motivated seller for the property on the open market.” 27. Mark Brown usually performs finance appraisals which are different than the special benefit appraisal done for assessments. Mr. Brown has only performed a few special benefit appraisals in his lifetime. Unlike Mr. Brown, Mr. Waytas has performed numerous special benefit appraisals and has averaged approximately 10 such appraisals annually since 2013. 28. The Properties are single-family residences. Both appraisers agreed the highest and best use of the Properties, both before and after the Project, was as single-family residences. 29. The parties agreed that the appraisers would use the appraisal of property owned by Plaintiffs Jenene and John Augustine as their exemplar. Since Patrick Judge testified in this matter, the parties also discussed the appraisal of the Judge property. 30. In his appraisal, Mr. Brown used the sales comparison approach; examining the purchase and resale of numerous properties before and after an improvement. Mr. Brown attributed any changes in sale prices to the improvement and did not consider other factors, such as an economic downturn, that may have contributed to the differences between the purchase price and resale price of a property. 31. Mr. Brown analyzed the value of each Property as bare land without reference to the structures 2 By Stipulation and Order filed June 1, 2018, the Court substituted Patrick and Heidi Judge for Arlene Wilson as Plaintiffs in this matter. 5 located on the land. Mr. Brown, however, acknowledges that the structures comprise approximately 75% of the value of the Properties. 32. Under his analysis, Mr. Brown found several properties whereby a new road actually resulted in a decrease in value. Mr. Brown did not consider these negative values, which he considered “paradoxical,” in his final analysis. Instead, Mr. Brown determined that a buyer does not recognize any change from a serviceable street to a new street and that it is impossible to attribute to the Properties a 1% or 2% change in value due to the new roads. Accordingly, Mr. Brown opined that new roads added no value, or special benefit, to the Properties. 33. Mr. Brown’s testimony is not credible regarding the special benefits inuring to the Properties as a result of the Project. 34. In his appraisal, Mr. Waytas analyzed the value of each property as improved with single- family homes. Mr. Waytas performed multiple separate analysis to verify his results. Mr. Waytas performed a sales comparison analysis of comparable properties; a mathematical linear regression analysis of a larger set of real estate market data; and a paired sale analysis. In a paired sales analysis, he compared the details of a subject property to four similar comparable properties after first making adjustment to the comparable properties to align them with the subject property. 35. Based on his analysis, Mr. Waytas testified credibly that the special benefit accruing to each of the Properties as a result of the newly constructed roads was $21,000.00. 36. Mr. Waytas testified credibly that the market data likely supported the special assessment of $24,858.85, except for the impact of the temporary overlay patch applied in 2012 to Townes Road. The overlay patch changed market perceptions by making buyers believe that the roadway was in better condition than the poor condition that actually existed. 37. The Properties in the White Oaks neighborhood each received a special benefit of $21,000.00 from the reconstruction of the roadways. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A special assessment is a tax that offsets the cost of local improvements, such as streets, and is imposed on the beneficiaries of the improvements. Buettner v. City of St. Cloud, 277 N.W.2d 199, 201 (Minn. 1979). 2. A person aggrieved by a special assessment in Minnesota may file an appeal pursuant to the terms of Minnesota Statute §429.081. Minnesota Statute §429.081 states: Within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment, any person aggrieved . . . may appeal to the district court . . . The court shall either affirm the assessment or set it aside and order a reassessment as provided in section 429.071, subdivision 2. If appellant does not prevail upon the appeal, the costs incurred shall be taxed by the court and judgment entered therefor. All 6 objections to the assessment shall be deemed waived unless presented on such appeal. This section provides the exclusive method of appeal from a special assessment levied pursuant to this chapter. (Emphasis added). 3. For a special assessment to be valid: “a) The land must receive a special benefit from the improvement being constructed, (b) the assessment must be uniform upon the same class of property, and (c) the assessment may not exceed the special benefit.” Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 240 N.W.2d 517, 519 (Minn. 1976). A special benefit is “measured by the increase in the market value of the land owing to the improvement.” Id. 4. In this case, Plaintiffs contend that: (1) the assessment is void ab initio and of no presumptive value because Edina did not specifically quantify the special benefit when determining the amount to assess each of the Properties; and (2) the road construction Project did not provide the Properties with a special benefit. 5. An assessment is “void on its face” if it fails to “approximate a market-value analysis.” Continental Sales & Equip. v. Town of Stuntz, 257 N.W.2d 546, 551 (Minn.1977)(An assessment based on front-footage is valid whereas a lump sum assessment on businesses without regard to market value is void). See also, Bisbee v. City of Fairmont, 593 N.W.2d 714, 718 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999)(Assessment based on estimated construction costs is void). To be valid, however, a city does not have to assess each parcel “exactly in the amount of benefit received; various formulas such as the front-footage or square-footage methods may be utilized.” Cont'l Sales & Equip. v. Town of Stuntz, 257 N.W.2d at 550. In this case, Edina calculated an assessment based on the cost of the Project divided by REUs. This is a valid methodology for determining the amount of assessments. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ contention that the assessment resolution is void ab initio and of no presumptive value is without merit. 6. An assessment “is presumed to be legal” and “[i]ntroduction of the assessment roll into evidence constitutes prima facie proof that the assessment is valid and does not exceed the special benefit to the assessed properties.” First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul, 884 N.W.2d 355, 366 (Minn. 2016). Plaintiffs may overcome this presumption by “introducing competent evidence that the assessment is greater than the increase in market value of the property due to the improvement.” Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, 240 N.W.2d 517, 519 (1976). When there is disputed evidence whether a property has received a special benefit, the court makes a factual determination regarding the special benefit conferred to the property. Id. at 519–20. 7. Mr. Brown and Mr. Waytas dispute whether the Properties received a special benefit from the Project. An appraiser in a special assessment case values the property before and after the public improvement. Eagle Creek Townhomes, LLP v. City of Shakopee, 614 N.W.2d 246, 251 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). An appraiser may use any method that fairly approximates the increase in a properties’ market value. DeSutter v. Twp. of Helena, 489 N.W.2d 236, 238 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). Generally, however, the “appraisal should take into account any buildings on the property and not merely look at the value of the bare land.” Eagle 7 Creek Townhomes, 614 N.W.2d at 251. “Logic tells us it is not error to consider family residences on a lot in assessing the before and after market value when both sides agree the highest and best use of that lot is a family residence.” DeSutter, at 238. 8. The appraisal methodology of Mr. Wytas is more trustworthy than the appraisal methodology of Mr. Brown. Additionally, in determining whether the Properties received a special benefit from the Project, Mr. Wytas appropriately included the structures, and not just the bare land. Accordingly, based on the testimony of Mr. Wytas, the road construction assessment benefited the Properties by $21,000.00. 9. The amount of $24,858.00 assessed to each of the Properties exceeds the $21,000.00 in special benefits conferred to each of the Properties as measured by the change in market value before and after the improvements. 10. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.081, the Court may either affirm the assessment or set it aside and order reassessment by the Edina City Council as provided in Minn. Stat. §429.071 Subd. 2. In this case, the Court is setting aside the assessment and ordering that Edina reassess the Property in accordance with this Order. 11. Plaintiffs seek to amend their Appeal to add a claim against Defendant for violation of 42 USC §1983 (“§1983”). Plaintiffs seek to amend the Appeal in order to request attorney fees, which are allowed by §1983 and not allowed under Minn. Stat. §429.071. 12. Rule 15.01 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure permits a party to amend a pleading by leave of the court, and “leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” The pleading may also be amended to conform to the evidence presented at trial. Minn. R. Civ. P. 15.02. However, a “motion to amend a complaint is properly denied when the additional claim could not survive summary judgment.” Bebo v. Delander, 632 N.W.2d 732, 740 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). 13. §1983 states: Every person who, under color of any statute . . . of any State . . . subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, . . . (Emphasis added) 14. A special assessment that exceeds the special benefit to the assessed property constitutes a taking of private property for public use without just compensation. Quality Homes, Inc. v. Vill. of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 280, 183 N.W.2d 555, 559 (1971). Both the U.S. and Minnesota constitutions prohibit a taking of private property without just compensation. See, U.S. Const. amend 5; Minn. Const. art. 1§13. The Plaintiffs, however, have no claim against the government for an unconstitutional “taking” if they are provided with an adequate process for obtaining compensation, and if resort to that process actually 8 yields “just compensation.” Williamson Cty. Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 194–95, 105 S. Ct. 3108, 3121 (1985). 15. Minnesota Statute §429.081 allows a court to set aside an assessment or order a reassessment. Plaintiffs have not alleged that Minnesota Statute §429.081 is unconstitutional by failing to provide “just compensation.” Therefore, Plaintiffs are provided with an adequate process for obtaining just compensation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have not stated a valid §1983 claim and their motion to amend is denied. ORDER 1. The special assessments at issue in this case are set aside and remanded to the Edina City Council for reassessment pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071 Subd. 2 in accordance with the findings of this Court. 2. Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their appeal and add a claim for attorneys’ fees under 42 USC §1983 is denied. BY THE COURT: WHITE OAKS C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-438 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PID Owner House No Street City State ZIP REU Assessment 1 18-028-24-11-0030 PATRICK V JUDGE & HEIDI A JUDGE 4707 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 1 21,000.00$ 2 18-028-24-11-0076 JANENE H AUGUSTINE & JOHN AUGUSTINE 4703 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 1 21,000.00$ 3 18-028-24-11-0024 JOHN D SCHUETZLE 4701 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 1 21,000.00$ 4 18-028-24-11-0092 DAVID C & SUSAN H GRAHAM 4700 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 1 21,000.00$ 5 18-028-24-11-0023 AMY/THEODORE STARK III 4621 TOWNES CIR EDINA MN 55424 1 21,000.00$ 6 18-028-24-11-0022 JASE WAGNER & SARAH WAGNER 4619 TOWNES CIR EDINA MN 55424 1 21,000.00$ 6 126,000.00$ Project Cost 126,000.00$ REU's 6.00$ Assessment Per REU 21,000.00$ 44187 4615 4600 8 5 6 24 4601 9 4650 4700 4541 4611 4703 4617 4511 4081 4700 4621 4701 4605 4707 4716 4607 4719 4704 4603 4703 4544 4609 4701 4607 4713 4703 4704 4708 4701 4619 4012 4611 4709 4717 4702 4706 4419 4600 4545 4529 4507 4717 4617 4604 4601 4531 4601 4613 4501 4 0 1 5 4702 4 0 4 7 4630 4615 4508 4 0 0 9 4064410241074501 41044 0 49 4 0 1 1 4607 4608 40834101 480041004605 4505 40624525 4523 4055 40514527 4503 4503 4509 4603 4515 4505 4507 4 0 4 3 4521 4519 4511 4517 4513 4 0 5 8 4 0 1 340604420 4 0 5 3 4626 4622 4600 4612 46064604 46104608 460241054 0 5 2 4 0 4 8 PROJECT LIMITS SUNNYSIDE RDTOWNES CIR TOWNES RDBRIDGE LN / Engineering DeptApril 2019 Re AssessmentWhite Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionENG 16-4CITYOFEDINAMINNESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Re Assessment 1 REU STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates April 17, 2019, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-438 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 19 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 17th day of April, 2019. Edina ty Clerk — Sharon Allison NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-438 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tue., May 7, 2019, at City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction: Property Identification No. 18-028-24-11-0022 The special assessment to this property for roadway reconstruction is $21,000.00. The total amount of the proposed special assessment is $126,000.00. The proposed assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. Payment Options The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years at the rate of 3.25 percent. Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the May 7 meeting, you may pay the assessment in one of these ways: I. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the City to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 22, 2019. 2. Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 22, 2019. The remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2020, with interest on the remaining assessment at the rate of 3.25 percent per annum from May 7, 2019 to Dec. 31, 2020. 3. Pay the assessment with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid in the Assessing Office by Nov. 22, 2019, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2020, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 3.25 percent per annum from May 7, 2019 to Dec. 31, 2020. Deferment The City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for a homestead property owned by a person age 65 or older for whom it would be a hardship to make payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's Office at Edina City Hall. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's Office by Nov. 15, 2019. 1 Below is an example of your annual payment over 15 years (principal plus interest). Payments are amortized using a level annual payment schedule. Sample Total Assessment Sample Annual Payment (Principal + Interest) $21,000 $1,828.64 Objections/Appeals If you wish to object or appeal to this assessment: I. File a signed, written objection with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing, or present the written objection to the Mayor at the assessment hearing. 2. Serve notice of the appeal to the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and file such notice with the District Court within 10 days after the notice was served to the Mayor or the City Clerk. To comment on the special assessment, you may: • Write to City of Edina, Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439. • Email to mailgEdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Engineering. • Attend the May 7, 2019 public hearing and offer comments. If you have questions regarding the project, please call the Engineering Department at 952-826-0371. If you have questions about paying your assessment, please call the Assessing Division at 952-826-0365. April 17, 2019 Sharon Allison City Clerk 2 Cut the bottom section and mail in with your payment if paying on or before Nov. 22, 2019: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX xxxxxxxxxx PAYMENT PROCEDURE • If paying on or before Nov. 22, 2019, please cut and return this stub with your payment. • Make check payable to the City of Edina. • Mail payment or pay in person: Edina City Hall, Assessing Division, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. Pay this total amount If not paid on or before Nov. 22, 2019, PID Impr. No. by Nov. 22, 2019, to avoid interest charges. the assessment will be placed on your property taxes at 3.25 percent annual interest rate, spread out over 15 years. 18-028-24-11-0022 BA-438 $21,000.00 Amount Enclosed: Name: 3 LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 4 WHITE OAKS C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-438 PID Owner House No Street City State ZIP 18-028-24-11-0030 PATRICK VJUDGE & HEIDI A JUDGE 4707 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 18-028-24-11-0076 JANENE H AUGUSTINE &JOHN AUGUSTINE 4703 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 18-028-24-11-0024 JOHN D SCHUETZLE 4701 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 18-028-24-11-0092 DAVID C & SUSAN H GRAHAM 4700 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424 18-028-24-11-0023 AMY/THEODORE STARK III 4621 TOWNES CIR EDINA MN 55424 18-028-24-11-0022 JASE WAGNER & SARAH WAGNER 4619 TOWNES CIR EDINA MN 55424 The CITY of EDINA White Oaks C Assessment Hearing May 7, 2019 The CITY of EDINABackground •2016 Street Reconstruction Project Completed •October 2017 Final Assessment Hearing •$24,858.85 per REU levied against 18 properties •6 of the18 appealed the assessment with District Court •February 2019 Court rendered a Conclusion of Law www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINABackground www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINAFindings of Fact •Plaintiffs appraiser = $0 market benefit from the project •City’s appraiser = $21,000 benefit per REU by 3 separate methods Less than the assessment because of a street patch 4 years prior to street reconstruction Without street patch, full assessment benefit supported •Court supported special benefit of $21,000 per REU •Court Order: Assessments set aside and remanded to the City for reassessment www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINARecommendation •Approve Resolution No. 2019-32 •Approve the refund of previous payments 2 properties paid the assessment in full 4 properties paid 2 of the 15 year assessment City assessor computed the refunds •Approve special assessment to 6 properties at $21,000 per REU www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-33 Public Drainage & Utility Easement Vacation at 4901 W. 77th Street Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution 2019-33 to vacate drainage and utility easements contingent on applicant providing new drainage and utility easements. INTRODUCTION: During the installation of the public pipes required for the development project, the contractor had to adjust the alignment of the pipes due to field conditions. This adjustment requires an accompanying adjustment to the drainage and utility easements to align with the actual field locations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2019-33 Notice of Public Hearing Survey Staff Presentation: Easement Vacation RESOLUTION NO. 2019-33 VACATING RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, an application was received on March 8, 2019 from the Pentagon Village, LLC, requesting that the right-of-way easements be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on May 7, 2019, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made contingent on property owners dedicating new public right-of-way easements as needed with the redevelopment project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the right-of-way easements are not needed for public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described right-of-way easements are hereby vacated contingent on property owners dedicating new public right-of-way easements as needed with the redevelopment project satisfactory to the City: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION EASEMENT VACATION A That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 5, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 86 degrees 28 minutes 27 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 243.91 feet to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 5 and to the point of beginning; thence on a bearing of South, a distance of 11.00 feet; thence on a bearing of West, a distance of 36.74 feet to a west line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 5; thence on a bearing of North, along said west line, a distance of 11.00 feet to said north line of the drainage and utility easement; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 57 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 36.74 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION B2 Resolution No. 2019-33 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 3, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence South 82 degrees 47 minutes 01 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 127.33 feet to a south line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 3 and to the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 57 seconds East along said south line, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence on a bearing of south, a distance of 189.31 feet to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 3; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West along said North line, a distance of 20.00 feet, thence on a bearing of north, a distance of 189.39 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION C2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 4, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 402.30 feet to an east line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4 and to the point of beginning; thence North 21 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 55.57 feet to a west line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4; thence on a bearing of North, a distance of 15.09 feet along said west line; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along said southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4, a distance of 8.65 feet, thence North 21 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 31.85 to a northerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, along said Northerly line, a distance of 44.98 feet to an east line of a drainage and utility easements dedicated on said Lot 4; thence on a bearing of South, a distance of 78.49 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION D2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 62 degrees 55 minutes 48 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 162.87 feet to a northerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 67 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 13.49 feet; thence on a bearing of East along said northerly line, a distance of 31.80 feet; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 27.43 feet, thence North 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 46.75 to a southerly line of a drainage and Resolution No. 2019-33 utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1; thence South 39 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said Southerly line, a distance of 21.42 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along said northerly line, a distance of 39.08 feet; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 8.19 feet; thence on a bearing of West, a distance of 35.32 feet; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 65.95 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION E That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 41 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 218.91 feet to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 68 degrees 13 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 15.62 feet; thence South 49 degrees 49 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 58.14 feet to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said lot 1; thence North 53 degrees 41 minutes 38 seconds West along the said southerly line, a distance of 73.13 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION F2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 19 degrees 49 minutes 07 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 162.00 feet to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 66 degrees 42 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 19.44 feet; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 86.06 feet; thence North 42 degrees 56 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 10.27 feet to a north line of said drainage and utility easement; thence on a bearing of East along said north line, a distance of 96.92 feet to the point of beginning. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to affect the transfer of this property. Resolution No. 2019-33 Adopted this 7th Day of May, 2019. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 2019 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on, Tuesday, May 7, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the following public right-of-way easement: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION EASEMENT VACATION A That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 5, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 86 degrees 28 minutes 27 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 243.91 feet to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 5 and to the point of beginning; thence on a bearing of South, a distance of 11.00 feet; thence on a bearing of West, a distance of 36.74 feet to a west line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 5; thence on a bearing of North, along said west line, a distance of 11.00 feet to said north line of the drainage and utility easement; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 57 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 36.74 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION B2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 3, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence South 82 degrees 47 minutes 01 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 127.33 feet to a south line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 3 and to the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 57 seconds East along said south line, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence on a bearing of south, a distance of 189.31 feet to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 3; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West along said North line, a distance of 20.00 feet, thence on a bearing of north, a distance of 189.39 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION C2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 4, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 402.30 feet to an east line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4 and to the point of beginning; thence North 21 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 55.57 feet to a west line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4; thence on a bearing of North, a distance of 15.09 feet along said west line; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along said southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4, a distance of 8.65 feet, thence North 21 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 31.85 to a northerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, along said Northerly line, a distance of 44.98 feet to an east line of a drainage and utility easements dedicated on said Lot 4; thence on a bearing of South, a distance of 78.49 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION D2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 62 degrees 55 minutes 48 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 162.87 feet to a northerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 67 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 13.49 feet; thence on a bearing of East along said northerly line, a distance of 31.80 feet; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 27.43 feet, thence North 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 46.75 to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1; thence South 39 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said Southerly line, a distance of 21.42 feet; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along said northerly line, a distance of 39.08 feet; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 8.19 feet; thence on a bearing of West, a distance of 35.32 feet; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 65.95 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION E That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 41 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 218.91 feet to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 68 degrees 13 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 15.62 feet; thence South 49 degrees 49 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 58.14 feet to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said lot 1; thence North 53 degrees 41 minutes 38 seconds West along the said southerly line, a distance of 73.13 feet to the point of beginning. EASEMENT VACATION F2 That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 19 degrees 49 minutes 07 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 162.00 feet to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 66 degrees 42 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 19.44 feet; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 86.06 feet; thence North 42 degrees 56 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 10.27 feet to a north line of said drainage and utility easement; thence on a bearing of East along said north line, a distance of 96.92 feet to the point of beginning. ADDED PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR EASEMENT B1 That part of Lot 3 and Lot 5, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence South 74 degrees 46 minutes 32 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 60.91 feet to a south line of a drainage and utility easement dedicated on said Lot 3 and said Lot 5 and to the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 57 seconds East along said south line, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence on a bearing of South, a distance of 64.92 feet; thence South 41 degrees 23 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 35.29 feet; thence on a bearing of South to a north line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 5, a distance of 98.25 feet; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 20.00 feet along said north line; thence on a bearing of North, a distance of 105.88 feet; thence North 41 degrees 23 minutes 25 seconds East, a distance of 35.29 feet; thence on a bearing of North, a distance of 57.36 feet to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR EASEMENT C1 That part of Lot 4, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 68 degrees 40 minutes 58 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 382.29 feet to a west line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4 and to the point of beginning; thence North 21 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 97.44 feet to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerly line, a distance of 31.85 feet; thence South 21 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds East, a distance of 20.81 feet to a west line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 4; thence on a bearing of South along said west line, a distance of 55.57 feet to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR EASEMENT D1 That part of Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 69 degrees 02 minutes 54 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 150.27 feet to a east line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence North 22 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East along said east line, a distance of 0.63 feet to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 1; thence South 67 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerly line, a distance of 14.01 feet; thence on a bearing of East along said southerly line, a distance of 30.42 feet; thence South 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerly line, a distance of 55.63 feet; thence on a bearing of West, a distance of 35.32 feet; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 65.18 feet to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR EASEMENT D3 That part of Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 87 degrees 23 minutes 15 seconds East, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 286.40 feet to a northerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along said northerly line, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence North 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1, a distance of 22.05 feet; thence South 39 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerly line, a distance of 4.31 feet; thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the Northeast, having a central angle of 03 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of 259.51 feet for an arc distance of 16.91 feet along said southerly line; thence South 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West not tangent to said curve, a distance of 14.96 feet to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR EASEMENT F1 That part of Lot 1, Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, said Block 1, PENTAGON VILLAGE, thence North 20 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Lot 2 has a bearing of North, a distance of 141.81 feet to a south line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1 and to the point of beginning; thence South 66 degrees 42 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 19.47 feet; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 109.75 feet; thence South 66 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds West to a southerly line of a drainage and utility easement as dedicated on said Lot 1, a distance of 17.50 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerly line, a distance of 20.43 feet; thence on a bearing of East along said south line, a distance of 129.24 feet to the point of beginning. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Sharon Allison, City Clerk Dated April 17, 2019 Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 The CITY of EDINA Vacation of Easements Pentagon Village South Parcel Resolution 2019-33 Public Hearing May 7, 2019 The CITY of EDINAExisting Easements www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINAUtilities City: No Issues, New Easements Required as part of Development Project Private Utilities: No Objections www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINASummary Staff recommends vacating the requested easements contingent on gaining new easements and that Council approve Resolution 2019-33. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-34 Public Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation at 5901 Lincoln Drive Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2019-34 to vacate drainage and utility easements at 5901 Lincoln Drive contingent on applicant providing new drainage and utility easements. INTRODUCTION: During the installation of the watermain required for the development project, the contractor had to adjust the alignment of the pipe due to field conditions. This adjustment requires an accompanying adjustment to the drainage and utility easements to align with the actual pipe location. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2019-34 Notice of Public Hearing Survey RESOLUTION NO. 2019-34 VACATING RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 5901 and 5995 Lincoln Drive WHEREAS, an application was received on March 19, 2019 from the LDH MN Edina, L.L.C., requesting that the right-of-way easements be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on May 7, 2019, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made contingent on property owners dedicating new public right-of-way easements as needed with the redevelopment project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the right-of-way easements are not needed for public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described right-of-way easements are hereby vacated contingent on property owners dedicating new public right-of-way easements as needed with the redevelopment project satisfactory to the City: That part of the 15-foot wide Drainage and Utility easement which lies over, under and across that part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, LINCOLN DRIVE RESIDENCES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 50 degrees 53 minutes 21 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northeast line of said Lot 1, a distance of 253.20 feet; thence South 39 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 6.00 feet to the northeasterly line of said Drainage and Utility easement and the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 08 degrees 55 minutes 22 seconds East along a northeasterly line of said easement, a distance of 72.95 feet to an angle point in said northeasterly line; thence North 38 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds West, continuing along said northeasterly line, a distance of 229.60 feet to the northwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence southwesterly a distance of 15.01 feet along the northwesterly line of said Lot 2, being a non-tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 333.00 feet, central angle of 2 degrees 34 minutes 57 seconds, and chord which bears South 49 degrees 56 minutes 47 seconds West, to the southwesterly line of said Drainage and Utility easement; thence South 38 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds East, along said southwesterly line, a distance of 222.57 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line; thence South 08 degrees 55 minutes 22 seconds West, continuing along said southwesterly line, a distance of 75.04 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line; thence South 50 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds East, continuing along said southwesterly line, a distance of 8.63 feet; thence North 39 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to affect the transfer of this property. Adopted this 7th Day of May, 2019. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 2019 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on, Tuesday, May 7th, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the following public right-of-way easement: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation: That part of the 15-foot wide Drainage and Utility easement which lies over, under and across that part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, LINCOLN DRIVE RESIDENCES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 50 degrees 53 minutes 21 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northeast line of said Lot 1, a distance of 253.20 feet; thence South 39 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 6.00 feet to the northeasterly line of said Drainage and Utility easement and the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 08 degrees 55 minutes 22 seconds East along a northeasterly line of said easement, a distance of 72.95 feet to an angle point in said northeasterly line; thence North 38 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds West, continuing along said northeasterly line, a distance of 229.60 feet to the northwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence southwesterly a distance of 15.01 feet along the northwesterly line of said Lot 2, being a non-tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 333.00 feet, central angle of 2 degrees 34 minutes 57 seconds, and chord which bears South 49 degrees 56 minutes 47 seconds West, to the southwesterly line of said Drainage and Utility easement; thence South 38 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds East, along said southwesterly line, a distance of 222.57 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line; thence South 08 degrees 55 minutes 22 seconds West, continuing along said southwesterly line, a distance of 75.04 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line; thence South 50 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds East, continuing along said southwesterly line, a distance of 8.63 feet; thence North 39 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. ADDED PROPERTY Proposed Drainage and Utility Easement: That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, LINCOLN DRIVE RESIDENCES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 50 degrees 53 minutes 21 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northeast line of said Lot 1, a distance of 253.20 feet; thence South 39 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 6.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 50 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 28.13 feet; thence North 26 degrees 45 minutes 05 seconds East, a distance of 68.52 feet; thence North 48 degrees 47 minutes 06 seconds West, a distance of 226.80 feet to the northwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence southwesterly a distance of 15.57 feet along the northwesterly line of said Lot 2, being a non-tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 333.00 feet, central angle of 2 degrees 40 minutes 45 seconds, and chord which bears South 56 degrees 46 minutes 14 seconds East; thence South 48 degrees 47 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 219.35 feet; thence South 26 degrees 45 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 68.97 feet; thence South 50 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 40.20 feet; thence North 39 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Sharon Allison, City Clerk Dated April 17, 2019 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-35 Site Plan Review for 7725 Washington Avenue, Self Storage Facility Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2019-35 approving the site plan at 7725 Washington Avenue for a self-storage facility. INTRODUCTION: On April 24, 2019, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Site Plan Review 7725 Washington Ave Resolution No. 2019-35: Site Plan Review for 7725 Washington Ave Site Location Proposed Plans Site Plan Engineer's Report Pedestrian Plan Applicant Narrative Applciant Narrative - Customer Overview Staff Presentation: Site Plan Review April 24, 2019 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Site Plan Review – 7725 Washington Avenue (Self Storage Facility) Information / Background: The Planning Commission is asked to review a site plan proposal to remodel and expand the existing building at 7725 Washington Avenue. A Site Plan review is required because the square footage of the proposed expansion exceeds the existing square footage by 10%. The existing building is 57,632 square feet in size. The proposed expansion areas are 57,058 square feet; therefore, the finished building would be 113,690 square feet. Users of the facility would drive into the addition on the north side of building and load/unload into the storage unit from inside building; after unloading they would then proceed forward through the building, turn around and exit. (See attached plans.) Customer access is available daily from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm. Office hours would be Monday through Friday 9:30 am to 6:00 pm and Saturday from 9:00 am to 5:30 pm. The facility would be closed on Sundays. The site is currently zoned PID, Planned Industrial District. Mini-storage is a permitted use. This project is code compliant; therefore, the applicant is entitled the proposed project. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Warehouse/office; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District. Easterly: Highway 169. Southerly: Warehouse/office; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District. Westerly: City of Eden Prairie; Nine Mile Creek Conservation Area. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 4.1 acres in size, and contains a two-story industrial/ office building. Planning Guide Plan designation: I, Industrial Zoning: PID, Planned Industrial District Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access points to the proposed development remain the same off of Washington Avenue. Mini-storage would general less traffic than the previous office use on the site. Edina’s recently adopted pedestrian and sidewalk plan includes a new sidewalk for the east side of Washington Avenue. (See attached plan.) Therefore, a condition of any approval should include the applicant’s construction of a boulevard style sidewalk on their property subject to engineering approval. The use would generate very little traffic to the site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual anticipates only 6 PM peak hour trips and 115 trips per day based on the size of the proposed facility. In comparison, a general office building would generate 90 PM peak hour trips and 400 trips per day; and a general light industrial use 40 PM peak hour trips and 250 trips per day. Parking Based on the City Code requirement, a total of 56 parking stall would be required (see table below). The proposed plans indicate 56 parking stalls on the site, with opportunity for more stalls north of the building if needed. The proposed use would not need the amount of parking that exists. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 45 over-story trees would be required. There are 47 existing and proposed over-story trees on the site. Building Design The addition is meant to complement and enhance the existing building. The existing building is brick. The addition will be an architectural panel to match the existing brick. (See attached building elevations.) Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. Any approvals of this project STAFF REPORT Page 3 would be subject to review and approval of the Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Compliance Table City Standard PID Proposed Front Street Side Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Parking - Front Parking - Side Parking - Rear 50 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet 80 feet 80 feet 70 feet 50 feet 40 feet 10 feet 20+ feet Building Height 4 stories 3 stories FAR Building Coverage Minimum Lot Size 60% 30% 2 acres 60% 23% 4.1 acres Parking Stalls 56 100 stalls existing Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the site plan. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets all Edina City Code standards for a Site Plan. 2. The proposed use is allowed in the PID, Planned industrial district, and would generate less traffic than a traditional office or light industrial land use. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped March 25, 2019. • Grading plan date stamped March 25, 2019. • Landscaping plan date stamped March 25, 2019. • Building elevations date stamped March 25, 2019. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 5. A boulevard style sidewalk shall be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit, subject to approval of the city engineer. Deadline for a city decision: May 21, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-35 APPROVING A SITE PLAN AT 7725 WASHINGTON AVENUE FOR A SELF STORAGE FACILITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Greg Hayes is requesting site plan proposal to remodel and expand the existing building at 7725 Washington Avenue. A Site Plan review is required because the square footage of the proposed expansion exceeds the existing square footage by 10%. The existing building is 57,632 square feet in size. The proposed expansion areas are 57,058 square feet; therefore, the finished building would be 113,690 square feet. 1.02 Users of the facility would drive into the addition on the north side of building and load/unload into the storage unit from inside building; after unloading they would then proceed forward through the building, turn around and exit. Customer access is available daily from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm. Office hours would be Monday through Friday 9:30 am to 6:00 pm and Saturday from 9:00 am to 5:30 pm. The facility would be closed on Sundays. 1.03 The site is currently zoned PID, Planned Industrial District; mini-storage is a permitted use, and the project is code compliant 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: That part of Tract E lying South of the North 16.08 feet thereof, said 16.08 feet being measured along the West. line of said Tract; The North 109.21 feet of Tract F, said 109.21 feet being measured along the West. line of said Tract; Registered Land Survey No. 1283, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property, Certificate of Title No. 1228182). 1.05 To accommodate the request, the following is required: Site Plan Review 1.04 On April 24, 2019, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets all Edina City Code standards for a Site Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-35 Page 2 2. The proposed use is allowed in the PID, Planned industrial district, and would generate less traffic than a traditional office or light industrial land use. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan for 7725 Washington Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped March 25, 2019. • Grading plan date stamped March 25, 2019. • Landscaping plan date stamped March 25, 2019. • Building elevations date stamped March 25, 2019. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 5. A boulevard style sidewalk shall be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit, subject to approval of the city engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-35 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on May 7, 2019. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 2019, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2019. _________________________________ City Clerk SITE LOCATION 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391 T: 952-426-7400 F: 952-426-7440PROJECTCLIENTPROJECT ADDRESSDATEPROJECT PHASEPROJ. NO.MohagenHansen.com Owner Ebert Construction EDINA SELF STORAGE MARCH 25, 2019 19056.0EBR Owner / 19056.0EBR / SCHEMATIC DESIGN / EDINA SELF STORAGESCHEMATIC DESIGN EDINA SELF STORAGE 7725 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55439 NEW CONSTRUCTION AREA MAP PROJECT GENERAL NOTES CONTINUEDPROJECT GENERAL NOTES APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS I ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DRAWING SET AS A REPRESENTATION OF OUR DESIGN INTENT. SHOULD OWNER INITIATE CHANGES THAT RESULT IN REVISIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICE FEES WILL BE CHANGED. CLIENT APPROVAL TITLE: AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCERTIFICATION ARCHITECTURAL 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, (AIA DOCUMENT A201, CURRENT EDITION) IN ITS ENTIRETY, ARE PART OF THESE DOCUMENTS. ADDITIONAL NOTES WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT MEANT TO OVERRIDE ANY PART OF A201. CONTACT ARCHITECT FOR A COPY OF A201, IF REQUIRED. 2. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED PROJECT. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE MEANS OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SUFFICIENT LIABILITY INSURANCE TO COVER WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION, GENERAL LIABILITY AND CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY. A COPY SHALL BE FILED WITH THE OWNER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. 5. THE CONTRACTOR WILL MAINTAIN BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE ON THE FORM KNOWN AS "ALL RISK" OR "MULTIPLE PERIL". THE CONTRACTOR, ALL SUBCONTRACTORS, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN EACH CAPACITY AS INSURED JOINTLY WITH THE OWNER IN ALL POLICIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION, FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION & NOTIFY ARCHITECT IF CONDITIONS, MATERIALS, SIZES AND DIMENSIONS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE SHOWN. 7. CROSS REFERENCE ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS WITH STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS BEFORE COMMENCING ANY FABRICATION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. 8. CONTRACTORS SHALL INSTALL ALL MANUFACTURED ITEMS, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT WHERE THE SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN, ARE MORE STRINGENT, AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH. 9. MATERIALS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND WHICH MAY NOT BE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS, SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE INTENDED USE. MATERIALS SHALL BE IN HARMONY WITH ADJACENT MATERIALS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WHERE INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES ARE NOT SPECIFIED, THEY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT INSTRUCTION AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS. 10. SHOP DRAWINGS PREPARED BY SUPPLIERS, SUBCONTRACTORS, ETC. SHALL BE REVIEWED, COORDINATED AND SIGNED AND STAMPED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTING TO THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES AND PAY ALL FEES CONNECTED THEREWITH THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PREPARE ALL SURFACES FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF FINISHES. THIS IS TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: PATCHING, SANDING, FLOOR LEVELING, PRIMING, SEALING, SKIM COATING, ETC. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE PREMISES FREE FROM WASTE MATERIAL OR RUBBISH CAUSED BY THE WORK. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND AREAS ON THE SITE OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY WALLS AND BARRIERS AS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN DUST AND DEBRIS AND TO PROVIDE SAFE PUBLIC ACCESS AND PASSAGE. 15. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL NEW MECHANICAL UNITS OR RELOCATE ANY EXISTING UNITS OR ITEMS THAT CONFLICT WITH NEW OR EXISTING FRAMING AND FULL HEIGHT WALLS. THIS INCLUDES ACCESS FOR ALL CONTROLS, FILTERS, ETC. THIS WORK MUST BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO BIDDING. 16. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND VERIFY WITH THE RESPECTIVE TRADES THE SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS, LOCATIONS OF FIRE TREATED BACKING/BLOCKING REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING ELECTRICAL AND/OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS CUTTING AND PATCHING FOR WORK REQUIRED BY MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL. 17. WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED IN AN AREA, THOROUGHLY CLEAN THE SPACES, ITEMS & SURFACES OF SOIL, WASTE MATERIAL, SMUDGES, SPATTERS, MISAPPLIED MATERIAL, SPOTS, STAINS, AND THE LIKE, WITHOUT DAMAGING THE MATERIALS AND SURFACES INVOLVED. 18. PROVIDE SEMI RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 19. ALL DOORS, FRAMES, HARDWARE, LIGHTING AND CEILING MATERIALS ARE TO FOLLOW BUILDING STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 20. PROVIDE FIRE TREATED BLOCKING IN WALLS AS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF MILLWORK, FURNITURE AND ACCESSORIES. 21. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY BUILDING STANDARDS WITH BUILDING MANAGER. ALL HARDWARE SETS AND KEYING TO BE COORDINATED WITH BUILDING MANAGERS. 22. ALL INTERIOR GLASS MUST COMPLY W/ APPLICABLE CODES FOR DESIGN LOADS & SAFETY GLAZING. 23. ALL MATERIALS USED IN PLENUM AREAS MUST BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE AND / OR LISTED FOR PLENUM USE AS DEFINED BY THE STATE & LOCAL CODES. IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ADHERE TO THESE REQUIREMENTS. 24. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO FIRE CAULK ALL NEW AND EXISTING PENETRATIONS WITHIN WALL PARTITIONS, ABOVE THE CEILING, AS INDICATED BY THE APPLICABLE CODES. 25. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND WILL BE REVIEWED FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. SUBMITTALS FOUND TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT WILL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED AND FORWARDED TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION IN KEEPING WITH MN CODE SECTION 1300.013 SUBSECTION 9B. SUBMITTALS NOT FOUND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT WILL BE RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR REVISION AND RESUBMITTAL. REVISED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND SUBMISSION TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: A. MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR) B. PLUMBING DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR) C. ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR) D. FIRE SUPPRESSION DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR) E. STRUCTURAL STEEL F. STEEL JOIST AND DECKING G. MISCELLANEOUS METALS STEEL STAIRS AND LANDINGS H. COLD FORMED METAL FRAMING FINISHES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR ANY AND ALL FLOORS, WALLS, CEILINGS, ETC. IN A WORKMANSHIP-LIKE MANNER TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AREAS. SURFACES OR MATERIALS DAMAGED BY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED, RESTORED AND REFINISHED TO MATCH THE EXISTING, UNLESS NOTED OR SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. IN ADDITION THOSE EXISTING SURFACES OR MATERIALS (SERVING AS A SUBSTRATE FOR NEW MATERIALS OR FINISHES) WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED FROM ANY CAUSE, SHALL BE REPAIRED, RESTORED, PROPERLY PREPARED AND CLEANED TO RECEIVE THE NEW MATERIALS AND FINISH WORK. ALL NEW MATERIALS & FINISH WORK TO BE FREE FROM FLAWS & DEFECTS. 2. PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING FLOOR SLAB AS REQUIRED FOR A SMOOTH AND LEVEL SURFACE FREE OF DEFECTS. FILL ALL CRACKS AND HOLES AND LEVEL DEPRESSIONS WITH MATERIALS COMPATIBLE WITH THE FLOOR AND SLAB AS RECOMMENDED BY THE FLOORING MANUFACTURER. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LEAD TIMES OF ALL MATERIALS SUCH THAT MATERIALS ARE ON SITE WHEN REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION. 4. ALL PREPARATION, STORING, INSTALLATION AND CLEANUP OF FINISHES TO CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING THE CONCRETE SUBFLOOR FOR MOISTURE PRIOR TO THE FLOORING INSTALLATION. IN ADDITION, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVING AND VERIFYING THAT THE TESTS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED PER ASTM STANDARDS. SHOULD THE FLOORING SUBCONTRACTOR BE ASSIGNED TO TEST THE CONCRETE SUBFLOOR, THEY WILL NEED TO PROVIDE TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THESE TESTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. NUMBER OF TESTS B. DIAGRAM OF TEST LOCATIONS C. ACCLIMATION PERIOD BEFORE RESULTS ARE RECORDED D. TEST RESULTS, AND THE AMBIENT CONDITIONS THE TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN AFTER CONFIRMATION THAT THE TESTED CONDITIONS MEET BOTH THE REFERENCED AND MANUFACTURER’S STANDARDS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MAY PROCEED WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE FLOORING PER MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATIONS. MECHANICAL 1. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN ALL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS. MECHANICAL DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CODE. THE MECHANICAL DESIGN IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ATTACHED ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE DESIGN IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE TENANT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. 2. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLS TO COMPLETE THE JOB. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE W/ THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ALL THE NECESSARY WIRING TO COMPLETE THE JOB. THE WIRING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. 3. PROVIDE WHITE SEMI RECESSED SPRINKLER HEADS W/ WHITE TRIM RING @ ALL ACT. CEILING AND FULLY RECESSED SPRINKLER HEADS W/ WHITE ESCUTCHEON PLATES @ ALL GYP. CEILING AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. 4. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZES OF ALL OPENINGS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CUT & PATCH OR ADD STRUCTURAL REINFORCING AS REQ'D FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MECHANICAL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT. 5. ALL SINKS SHALL HAVE HOT AND COLD WATER WITH BELOW COUNTER PIPE INSULATION WRAP ON EXPOSED PIPING PER ADA GUIDELINES. 6. PROVIDE AND INSTALL AN APPROPRIATE SIZED WATER HEATER AS REQUIRED. 7. THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A CLEAN-OUT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PLUMBING LINES ARE INSTALLED. ELECTRICAL 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN ALL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS. THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ATTACHED ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND TENANT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. 2. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND TO PROVIDE DISCONNECT AND POWER WIRING FOR ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. 3. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EXIT AND EMERGENCY LIGHTS AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. 4. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION AND ALARM DEVICES AND WIRING OF THE SPACE AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES FOR THE INTERIOR BUILD-OUT SPACE. 5. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL JUNCTION BOXES W/ PULL STRING FOR ALL VOICE / DATA AND PHONE LOCATIONS. THE TENANT IS TO COORDINATE & PROVIDE ALL LOW VOLTAGE CABLING AND COVER PLATES AS REQUIRED. 6. NEW ELECTRICAL OUTLETS ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NO OUTLETS ARE TO BE BACK TO BACK. 7. ALL UNDER CABINET LIGHTING IS TO BE CONTROLLED BY A WALL SWITCH. 8. THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY REGARDING LOCATION, QUANTITIES, AND TYPES OF LIGHT FIXTURES. THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN REFERENCES LIGHT FIXTURES, HOWEVER THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE FIXTURE TYPE, APPROPRIATE FOOTCANDLES AND VOLTAGE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL SPECIFIED LIGHT FIXTURES IN ASSOCIATION W/ THE SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS AND PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ORDERING OR INSTALLATION OF ANY FIXTURES. INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 2012 AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1300 2015 AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1341 2015 AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1307 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (IFC) 2012 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE 2012 AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1346 2015 STATE BUILDING CODE (MSBC) 2015 MN PLUMBING CODE 2015 MN ENERGY CODE 2015 ASHRAE 90.1-2010 CRITERIA NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2017 MN STATE FIRE CODE 2015 FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION: FULLY SPRINKLED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 2B BUILDING OCCUPANCY: S1; B FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION: CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0 INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0 EXTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS 0 STRUCTURAL FRAME 0 PARTITIONS- PERMANENT 0 SHAFT ENCLOSURES 0 FLOOR- CEILINGS/FLOORS 0 ROOFS- CEILING/ROOFS 0 EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS N.A. SHEET INDEX SHEET # SHEET DESCRIPTION PLAN REVIEWGENERAL A000 SHEET COVER ● CIVIL C-0 SURVEY ● C-1 REMOVAL PLAN ● C-2 SITE PLAN ● C-3 GRADING PLAN ● C-4 UTILITY PLAN ● LANDSCAPE L100 TREE PRESERVATION AND MITIGATION PLAN ● L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN ● L102 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ● ARCHITECTURAL P200 FIRST FLOOR PLAN ● P300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION ● P301 PRESENTATION IMAGES ● P302 PRESENTATION IMAGE ● DesignerDan JennyDate3/24/2019ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.20.30.40.40.10.30.40.50.60.10.30.60.81.00.10.30.71.31.60.10.30.71.52.30.10.30.71.41.80.10.30.60.91.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.30.40.60.70.50.40.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.20.30.40.41.21.00.90.80.50.30.20.10.10.10.10.20.20.21.81.91.71.10.70.50.30.10.10.10.10.11.62.01.10.70.40.20.10.50.70.50.30.20.10.10.70.60.60.50.30.10.10.81.10.70.30.20.10.11.92.11.71.10.70.40.20.11.41.31.30.90.60.40.20.10.10.10.10.10.70.70.70.60.40.30.20.10.10.20.20.20.10.30.30.30.30.30.20.10.10.10.20.30.30.20.10.20.20.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.60.30.20.20.20.10.10.20.50.70.90.40.30.20.10.10.20.51.01.70.60.50.30.20.20.51.12.01.00.80.50.20.20.51.11.81.71.00.50.20.20.50.81.12.11.10.50.20.20.40.50.61.71.00.50.20.10.20.30.40.40.71.00.70.50.20.10.20.20.20.30.60.50.30.20.10.10.10.10.20.40.30.20.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.5A @ 20'A @ 20'A @ 20'A @ 20'A @ 20'Plan ViewScheduleSymbol Label QuantityManufacturerCatalogNumberDescriptionLampNumberLampsFilenameLumens PerLampLight LossFactorWattageA5 LithoniaLightingDSXW1 LED20C 100040K T3MMVOLTDSXW1 LED WITH (2)10 LED LIGHTENGINES, TYPE T3MOPTIC, 4000K, @1000mA.LED 1 DSXW1_LED_20C_1000_40K_T3M_MVOLT.ies7572173.2 UP UP P300 4 P300 2 P3001 P300 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A B C D E F G H I J K L a 27 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" bcdefgj 01 02 03 04 05 3' - 8"5' - 0" 8' - 8" 8' - 8" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0"4' - 6"STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS ELEVATOR ELEVATOR 5' - 6" 4' - 0"4' - 7 7/16"STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STAIRS OFFICE UNLOADING P 5' - 6" STORAGE UNITS 14 15 M ON STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STAIRS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS STORAGE UNITS h SITE INFORMATION: EXIST. BUILDING 1ST FLOOR AREA = +/- 28,816 SF 28,816 X 2 (FLOORS) = 57,632 GSF LOT SF = 189,483.33 (SURVEY DATA) 189,483.33 X 0.6 (FAR) = 113,690 GSF = 113,690 - 57,632 = 56,058 GSF ADDITION ALLOWED ELEVATOR STORAGE UNITS -- N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMETHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. COMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONC:\Users\kchi\Documents\19056_Edina Storage_kchi@mohagenhansen.com.rvtP200 Checker Author MARCH 25, 2019 19056.0EBR Path SCHEMATIC DESIGN EDINA SELF STORAGE NEW CONSTRUCTION EDINA SELF STORAGE 7725 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55439 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"P200 1 1ST LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" ROOF 130' - 0" 2ND LEVEL 114' - 8" T.O. PARAPET 132' - 0" MP-1 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN LETTERS ALUM. SUNSHADE ALUM. STOREFRONT MP-1 MP-2 EXIST. PC EXIST. PC. COLUMN P-1 PC-2 MP-1 MP-2 ALUM. SUNSHADE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN LETTERS ALUM. WINDOW MTL-1 EXIST. WINDOW OVERHEAD DOOR MTL-1 EXIST. BRICK TO PAINT MATCH TO PC-1 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" ROOF 130' - 0" 2ND LEVEL 114' - 8" T.O. PARAPET 132' - 0" LOWER LEVEL 88' - 0" PC-2 P-1 PC-1 PC-3 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN LETTERS ALUM. SUNSHADE ALUM. WINDOW EXIST. WINDOW EXIST. BRICK EXIST. PC. COLUMN EXIST. PC WALL ALUM STORE FRONT ENTRANCE ALUM. STOREFRONT INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN LETTERS MTL-1 ELEVATOR SHAFT MTL-1 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" ROOF 130' - 0" 2ND LEVEL 114' - 8" T.O. PARAPET 132' - 0" LOWER LEVEL 88' - 0" MP-1 MP-2 P-1 PC-1 PC-3 ALUM. SUNSHADE ALUM. WINDOW EXIST. PC EXIST. PC. CLOUMN EXIST. BRICK EXIST. WINDOWMTL-1 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" ROOF 130' - 0" 2ND LEVEL 114' - 8" T.O. PARAPET 132' - 0" LOWER LEVEL 88' - 0" PC-3 PC-1 PC-3 PC-2 OVERHEAD DOOR INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN LETTERSMTL-1 MTL-1 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE PC-1 INSULATED ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST PANEL FINISH: MEDIUM GRAY AGGREGATE AND LIGHT GRAY AGGREGATE EMBOSSED BRICK TEXTURE PAINTED P-1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND PC-3 INSULATED ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST PANEL FINISH: LIGHT GRAY AGGREGATE MP-1 2-1/2" THICK METL SPAN STRIATED INSULATED METAL PANEL COLOR: POLAR WHITE P-1 GREY PAINT MATCHING BRAND STANDARDS (TBD) ; SEND SAMPLE TO ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL MTL-1 PREFINISHED METAL TRIM COLOR: DARK GRAY PC-2 INSULATED ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST PANEL FINISH: MEDIUM GRAY AGGREGATE AND LIGHT GRAY AGGREGATE MP-2 2-1/2" THICK METL SPAN STRIATED INSULATED METAL PANEL COLOR: DARK GRAY N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMETHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. COMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONC:\Users\kchi\Documents\19056_Edina Storage_kchi@mohagenhansen.com.rvtP300 Checker Author MARCH 25, 2019 19056.0EBR Path SCHEMATIC DESIGN EDINA SELF STORAGE NEW CONSTRUCTION EDINA SELF STORAGE 7725 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55439 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"P300 1 East Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"P300 3 North Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"P300 4 South Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"P300 2 West Elevation MP-1MP-2 MP-1 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE PAINTED BRICK EXAMPLE EMBOSSED BRICK EXAMPLE 1 EMBOSSED BRICK EXAMPLE 2 AGGREGATE FINISH EXAMPLE SMOOTH FINISH EXAMPLE METAL PANEL EXAMPLE N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMETHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. COMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONC:\Users\kchi\Documents\19056_Edina Storage_kchi@mohagenhansen.com.rvtP301 Checker Author MARCH 25, 2019 19056.0EBR Path SCHEMATIC DESIGN EDINA SELF STORAGE NEW CONSTRUCTION EDINA SELF STORAGE 7725 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55439 PRESENTATION IMAGES NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE VIEWS SOUTHEAST PERSPECTIVE VIEWS SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVE VIEWSNORTHWEST PERSPECTIVE VIEWS NORTHEAST EXISTING VIEWS NORTHWEST AERIAL EXISTING VIEWS NORTHWEST EXISTING VIEWS SOUTHWEST EXISTING VIEWSSOUTHEAST EXISTING VIEWS N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMETHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. COMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONC:\Users\kchi\Documents\19056_Edina Storage_kchi@mohagenhansen.com.rvtP302 Checker Author MARCH 25, 2019 19056.0EBR Path SCHEMATIC DESIGN EDINA SELF STORAGE NEW CONSTRUCTION EDINA SELF STORAGE 7725 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55439 PRESENTATION IMAGE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE VIEWS DATE: April 18, 2019 TO: 7725 Washington Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering RE: 7725 Washington Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil, Landscape, and Architectural drawings dated 3/25/2019. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Construct sidewalk along Washington Avenue per the Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Provide sidewalk easements along Washington Avenue if sidewalk is located on private property. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 4. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 7. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 8. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. (If required) Grading/Building Permit 9. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 10. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 11. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the city to Grading/Building Permit calculate possible sewer and water connection charges. Storm Water Utility 12. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 13. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 14. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 15. An erosion and sediment control plan consistent with city code is required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 16. Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts permit is required. Grading/Building Permit 63Recommendations Proposed pedestrian network Sidewalks and trails connecting neighborhoods and destinations to Edina’s Twin Loops are identified as Primary connections, while other pedestrian links are identified as Secondary. Existing sidewalks Existing shared-use path/trail Existing network in neighboring community Planned network in neighboring community Existing facilities Edina Twin Loops - All Ages and Abilities Network New Primary sidewalk New shared-use path Upgrade existing sidewalk to shared-use path New Secondary sidewalk Recommendations Proposed pedestrian network 1Recommendations: Engineering / 6Es Project Narrative Temperature Controlled Self Storage 7725 Washington Ave S, Edina Project site is 7725 Washington Ave S, Edina, MN, 4.35 acres – platted lot. Ebert is proposing to add onto & redevelop the existing two-story building and property into an all interior temperature controlled self storage facility of 113,690 sq. ft. with all loading & unloading done internal to the building. Customers would drive-in to load and unload, using two overhead doors on a new loading / unloading bay constructed on the north side of the building. Typical hours of operation are: Customer access daily 6:00 am to 10:00 pm. Office hours Monday – Friday 9:30 am – 6:00 pm. Saturday 9:00 am – 5:30 pm. • Existing two story building 28,816 x 2 floors = 57,632 gsf • New addition of 57,058 gsf (three floors – 1 below grade) • Total combined 113,690 gsf • Existing zoning is planned industrial district (PID) • Property is located within the HOD-4 district Project design is following & complementing the existing building design using decorative precast with brick details, glass, architectural metal. Utility services at the property are in sufficient size and capacity for the intended use. Fire access has been preliminary reviewed. Project will look to reduce the overall hard surface working with Nine Mile Creek Watershed. Reduced parking & traffic to fit the project needs: This size project typically only requires less than 15 parking stalls, four being handicap (see similar size projects below). The existing site has 204 parking stalls that includes 8 handicap stalls. The project site plan is retaining parking for 100 stalls, 4 of which are handicapped. Modern temperature-controlled facilities such as this have very low traffic impact, on average sixty traffic counts per day. Similar sized projects recently completed: 8570 Aspen Lane N, Brooklyn Park / 2960 Empire Lane, Plymouth / 12995 Valley View Rd, Eden Prairie / 4400 Fountain Hills Dr., Prior Lake. All range from 8 - 12 total parking, varies by city. Additional Self Storage Information The site has two curb openings/access from Washington Ave S. The access is already developed & owned by the site. Temperature Controlled Self Storage: The site has all storage contained within the building and no outside storage. Access for loading & unloading is all internal to the building by way of a specific loading & unloading bay accessed by the two overhead doors that allow for drive-thru easy access for loading and unloading. The loading area is 40ft deep in depth and is designed to accommodate U-Haul type trucks, vans, pickups and even a pickup or car with trailer. The entire buildings space is heated & cooled and is light, bright & secure. Customers after loading then move their storage items to the unit or to one of three elevators to one of the floors. The building’s mix of storage units is anticipated to be approx. 700+ ranging in size from 5x5 up to 10x30 size. No vehicle storage is allowed, with restrictions on flammables, explosives, weapons, toxic materials and such. No dumpster for disposal of items is provided, simple trash container stored inside only for office staff. Overall the building is very secure, light & bright with monitor cameras throughout the interior and also the exterior. Secure code access and even modern smart phone access can be used (tracks who and when accessed the building and how long). Customers find this type of environment safe/secure and a good place to store items. Industry overview attached that provides additional information. MEET THE FACE OF YOUR NEW CUSTOMER Why do people use Self-Storage Units? Compared to other options such as renovating an existing building or renting additional rooms, self-storage units provide an economical alternative for people and businesses wishing to keep their assets and belongings in a secure location that’s protected from the environment. But beyond the financial considerations, there are several reasons why increasing numbers of people are now using a self-storage unit as an extension of their personal or professional space PH (763) 498. 7844 FX (763) 498. 9951 (800) 627. 1669 Top 7 Reasons Why People Use Self-Storage Units 1. Renovating Your Existing Home During those times when home or office improvements are underway, a self-storage unit provides a safe temporary shelter for your valued movable items. Once the work is complete, you then have the option of removing your belongings from storage and restoring them to their original positions or taking the opportunity to re-plan your interiors. 2. Moving to a New Home In a complex property market, moving to a new location isn’t always a straightforward process that can be accomplished in a day. Delays often occur, and without a fallback option you could be left in a real dilemma if your belongings are set to go, but your new premises aren’t yet available. Self-storage provides a way station for holding your items until such time as you’re ready and able to move them into their new home. 3. Changes in Relationship Status When terminating a personal relationship in which cohabitation is involved, it’s often the case that one partner or the other may desire (or even be legally required) to leave the common residence and find alternative accommodation. Or partners forming a new relationship may be in a hurry to leave their existing accommodations and set up house together as quickly as possible. 4. A Safe Place for Equipment Individuals or organizations who use equipment or hardware that operates on a seasonal basis (such as ski equipment, gardening tools or camping gear) typically won’t want this stuff cluttering up their home throughout the year. 5. You’re Often in Transit Frequent travelers may have a need to acquire short-term accommodation that’s incapable of holding all of their belongings. And shifting all of their valuables each time they make a trip may simply be impractical. A self-storage unit solves these problems by providing the space and protection necessary for holding items that aren’t required on your travels. And rental contracts may be negotiated for whatever length of time is most convenient for the duration of your trip. PH (763) 498. 7844 FX (763) 498. 9951 (800) 627. 1669 Top 7 Reasons Why People Use Self-Storage Units (cont.) 6. Storing Business Inventory or Archives Both large business organizations and smaller entrepreneurs often have the need to store samples, inventory, business archives, and important documents relating to their work. But with office and warehousing spaces taking a serious bite out of their annual budgets, renting larger premises may not be the best or most economical option. Self-storage units can provide climate and environment controlled “mini-warehouse” facilities at a significantly lower cost than a full-blown property rental. Access to inventory and archives is typically available whenever the owner wants it, and the security controls offered by a reputable self-storage facility give business users the assurance that their valued assets will always remain physically safe. 7. Simply Running Out of Space For anyone who’s running out of space for their belongings in their home or office setting, a self-storage unit provides a secure and economical option for accommodating the surplus. Likewise, self-storage is a sensible option for anyone who’s looking to decongest their existing living or workspace by shifting items that they don’t need to see every day but nonetheless wouldn’t want to lose entirely. Self-storage units are available in a wide range of sizes, and rental contracts may cover both short and longer terms of storage. Environment and climate-controlled units are available (depending on the storage facility) to accommodate virtually anything – within reason – that you might want to store. PH (763) 498. 7844 FX (763) 498. 9951 (800) 627. 1669 The CITY of EDINA Site Plan Review – 7725 Washington Avenue (Self Storage Facility) The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINARequest Requires •Site Plan Review (This project is Code Compliant) www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 7 City Standard PID Proposed Front Street Side Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Parking - Front Parking - Side Parking - Rear 50 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet 80 feet 80 feet 70 feet 50 feet 40 feet 10 feet 20+ feet Building Height 4 stories 3 stories FAR Building Coverage Minimum Lot Size 60% 30% 2 acres 60% 23% 4.1 acres Parking Stalls 56 100 stalls existing Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Code Compliant Site Plan The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 9 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY of EDINARecommendation www.EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 18 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2019-36 Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Hardware Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2019-36 approving a conditional use permit for Restoration Hardware at 6801 France Avenue South. INTRODUCTION: On April 24, 2019, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Hardware Resolution No. 2019-36: Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Hardware Aerial Map Building Department Memo Applicant Submittal Staff Presentation: Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Hardware April 24, 2019 Planning Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit for RH (Restoration Hardware) at 6801 France Avenue South Information / Background: Restoration Hardware (RH), the applicant is proposing rooftop dining at the building under construction at 6801 France Avenue. A site plan for Restoration Hardware was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2017. The project was reviewed administratively after approval by the Planning Commission and City Council, due to the project changing from 3-4 stories down to three stories in height. The top floor of the three story RH under construction includes kitchen space, a pantry/wine bar, café, and outdoor terrace space with outdoor dining. To accommodate the request, the following is requested: Conditional Use Permit for the rooftop dining. Rooftop restaurants are a conditional use in the Planned Commercial District. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Edina Water Tower on the Southdale Site; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Easterly: Southdale Theaters; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Southerly: Galleria Shopping Center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Westerly: Bank of America; zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property, 6801 France Avenue, is 2.09 acres in size and is located within the Southdale Center site. Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District Site Circulation, Traffic & Parking There would be no change in access or traffic to the site with the addition of rooftop dining. No additional traffic or parking needs would be generated with the approval of the rooftop restaurant as a restaurant was always planned with this development. A number of parking studies have been completed with new development and redevelopment of Southdale Center. A parking study was completed and a parking variance was approved with the original site plan. Building/Building Material No changes would be made to the exterior of the building which was administratively approved by planning staff. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 36-612 of the Edina City Code, a conditional use permit for rooftop restaurants shall meet the following: 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. The city council may further restrict the hours of operation based upon the proximity of the area to residential dwelling units and upon considerations relating to the safety and welfare of residents, businesses, and other uses near the establishment. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city's noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city Code. 3. The rooftop dining area shall be kept in a clean and orderly manner. No food or beverages may be stored on the rooftop unless a suitable means for such storage has been reviewed and approved by the city as part of the CUP. 4. Rooftop restaurants must be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses at the time the rooftop restaurant is established. STAFF REPORT Page 3 5. A liquor license is required to serve alcohol in the rooftop dining area. 6. Fencing or a guard is required around the perimeter of the rooftop dining area per the Minnesota State Building Code. 7. Lighting shall be permitted to the extent that it only illuminates the designated area. Lighting shall not shine or cause a glare upon other public or private property outside the designated area, and subject to section 36-1260. Staff believes that the above criteria are met. The application indicates that the rooftop will be open from Monday-Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. and Sunday from 11:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. with Section 36-612 of the Edina City Code. There isn’t residential property in close proximity to the proposed rooftop restaurant. Single family housing is located approximately 650 feet to the west behind the office and commercial developments on the west side of France Avenue. Restaurant space was included with the original site plan. A parking variance was granted with the approval of the site plan in 2017. Based on this information the parking is adequate for the rooftop restaurant and no additional spaces are required. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the plans proposed reasonable to minimize impacts for the conditionally permitted Use? Yes, the proposed application for rooftop dining meets the requirements per section 36-612 of the Zoning Code. There are no changes to the proposed building or approved site plan. A parking study was completed that concluded that Southdale had adequate parking with all of the redevelopment of the 80-acre site. A parking variance was approved with the original site plan approval. A restaurant was an included use with the site plan approval, now a portion of the proposed seating is proposed to include outdoor rooftop seating. Per the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit, it can be determined that the project will meet the requirements for a rooftop restaurant. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for rooftop dining at Restoration Hardware, 6801 France Avenue South. Approval is subject to the following conditions and findings: 1. The proposed rooftop dining is not in close proximity to existing residential uses. STAFF REPORT Page 4 2. The proposal meets the conditional use permit criteria in Section 36-612 of the City Code. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city’s noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city code. 3. The rooftop dining area will be kept in a clean and orderly manner. 4. Service of alcoholic beverage requires the applicant to obtain appropriate liquor licenses in compliance with Edina Code Section 4 and Minnesota Statute 340A. 5. Required fencing shall meet the Minnesota State Building Code and must be reviewed and approved by the Building Department at the time of building permit. 6. Lighting shall meet the requirements in Section 36-1260 of City Code. 7. The rooftop dining area shall be constructed per the plans date stamped March 19, 2019. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-36 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RESTORATION HARDWARE AT 6801 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Restoration Hardware (RH) is proposing rooftop dining at the building under construction at 6801 France Avenue South. A site plan for Restoration Hardware was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2017. The project was reviewed administratively after approval by the Planning Commission and City Council, due to the project changing from 3-4 stories down to three stories in height. The top floor of the three story RH under construction includes kitchen space, a pantry/wine bar, café, and outdoor terrace space with outdoor dining. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Tract B of Registered Land Survey No. 1849, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. A Conditional Use Permit. 1.04 On April 24, 2019, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. 1.05 On May 7, 2019 the City Council held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed rooftop dining is not in close proximity to existing residential uses. 2. The proposal meets the conditional use permit criteria in Section 36-612 of the City Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-36 Page 2 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Hardware (RH) at 6801 France Avenue South. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city’s noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city code. 3. The rooftop dining area will be kept in a clean and orderly manner. 4. Service of alcoholic beverage requires the applicant to obtain appropriate liquor licenses in compliance with Edina Code Section 4 and Minnesota Statute 340A. 5. Required fencing shall meet the Minnesota State Building Code and must be reviewed and approved by the Building Department at the time of building permit. 6. Lighting shall meet the requirements in Section 36-1260 of City Code. 7. The rooftop dining area shall be constructed per the plans date stamped March 19, 2019. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on May 7, 2019. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-36 Page 3 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 2019, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2019. _________________________________ City Clerk City of Edina, Hennepin County, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB &Associates 2013, © WSB & Associates 2013 Restoration Hardware April 18, 2019 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 250 ft / April 3, 2019 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official Restoration Hardware at 6801 France Ave Conditional Use Permit for adding more usable space on the third level and rooftop dining. Information / Background: Restoration Hardware is currently under construction at 6801 France Ave. This project has been going well. The architect, contractor and owner’s rep have met with the Planning, Health & Building Divisions about the proposed changes. The changes will meet the State building, plumbing, mechanical and accessibility codes. Written Statement in Support of Condition Use Permit Restoration Hardware consists of a 3-story building that will feature decor and distinctive home furnishings seamlessly integrated with a curated food and beverage program. The ground floor and second floor of the building will primarily be the display of furniture and decor in a series of rooms - complete living, bed and bathrooms. There will also be an interactive RH Design Atelier, an integrated interior design workspace that allows RH design consultants and customers to conceptualize one room or an entire home. The third floor will feature a roof-top café with no more than 300 seats total within the interior and exterior areas. The main entries to the building are located on the southwest and northeast elevations, with adjacent outdoor patio areas to these entrances. Similar projects have been completed at the following locations: • Yountville, CA • Denver/Cherry Creek, CO • Tampa, FL • West Palm Beach, FL • Chicago, IL • The Gallery in the Historic Meatpacking District, NY • Nashville, TN • Toronto, CAN Below please find additional information relative to the rooftop restaurant: a. Hours of operation: Monday — Saturday, 10:00 a.m. — 9:00 p.m., and Sunday, 11:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. b. Amplified sound: None. c. Rooftop cleanliness and storage: Employees will regularly walk-through the area and make sure it is kept clean and orderly. Food and beverage will stored in the interior areas of the third floor. d. Residential screening: There are no residential dwellings adjacent to this building. e. Liquor licensing: A liquor license was submitted to Jane Timm with the City of Edina on March 8, 2019, for this space. f. Fencing or guard around perimeter: Fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the rooftop area pursuant to the Minnesota State Building Code. g. Lighting: Lighting will be installed pursuant to Section 36-1260 of Edina's City Code. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 ?.019 CITY OF EDINA SOUTH RENDERING AO RI---1 EDINA RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 IMMO 1NIIM i MI' h jilifirctii Frovinuer .,,..„,.. 110,1 111! ili.111AI29 EF:711111' r; • .;,4' I gill 111111111111111 11111111 11111111 II IE111 IIi119,1,11:1111 03.14.2019 k O 0 Ike MALL LOOP ROAD I rr tt0 o e e _ Art _VD ete e e. • "a lie ' >ci 410'. ?Po 10. 79° ---;:011111111111111.4MilIIIIVIMEttini I LIEEVIIIIir L111111111111111 - IMO* — rffin \,....? • 0.--4 E •-d- i • ICT a .1-7>-< - ,•- -.L.= I 1 " I III II \ `\ ‘§k.,• \ • \ \ \ \ \ \ % • % • % • /-N, % • % % • / EXISTING WATER N. % • TOWER % • % • % • . % • % • % • % • % • ',., 4k ) % • % • % • •,\ % • ‘' % \ \\ \\\ / 0 %% / \\ / \\ / C OS /%(,. • \ \ % % % %. % •\ % % % % % % % % \‘‘. % % % % % %, \ % % % % % % % % • • % % % • % '‘`,%,. % % ,, • % s.',•• % \ • % % % \ \ .et, \ \ • \ \ % % % % .7,,e, \\ \ • \ ) \ % • % % •\ 7+ \ \ % • % % % \ A \ % \ % % \ % .," % \ ..„, ./%; \\% % % v \ \ \ % \ • % % % % % 'T/ % \ ‘ \ .\ > ‘ \ \ \ . A \ \ • \ s % <S:1, \ % % . ir \\ \ \ % % % \ \ \ \ % % % \\\ \ \ % \ % % % \\ \ \ % % % \„, \ % % % \\ \ \ \ % % % \ \ , \ \ \\ ▪ % % ...\ . \ % % % N \ \ % % % \\ \ ‘ 'N % -\\% \ % % % % % %, \---- _ _/ _ \ % % % % % 0 0 p // / // O/ // e/ e/ ,, NV // ,•,.. , %., , / ,1 e/ / /, ,/ / , / e/ • 0,1 0„4Z /76 /, ,' // ey \ , e .--, / ,,,,,,; , e / / / 06tcss ,, '4>\:, , / / . / / 4. e / __ _____ / e / c)/ ,, / e , ' / / G_v / / v , / / / / , / /;,;', ' PI3dJECT NORTH / / , // / ./.2', / e , • , , / e e / / / / / /.;'„ ,'- / 0 / //// , / e/ • ee ,, // / 0 20' 40' 80' , / //// , / e, , , /.; // //,„' , / N() // , / , / - , , / --, /, , / \, „ /4 / R SH C000 00 04q 4*3 CtIO 0 0 \ \ • III • 00000.000C V.4.000 . RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 Al SITE PLAN EDINA 03.14.2019 BLACK PAINT FOR EXPOSED STEEL DOORS & WINDOWS BLUESTONE PAVER SYSTEM SMOOTH CEMENT STUCCO EXTERIOR FINISH T.O. STAIR PARAPETA, ELEV = 152' - 0"4. ELEV = 135' - 0°4' LEVEL 2•0, ELEV 118' - 0"sf LEVEL 1h ELEV = 100' - 0" sly COLORED CAST STONE SCALE: 1/16" = 1,-0" RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 A2 SOUTH ELEVATION + MATERIALS EDINA 03.14.2019 .11•016126.1.1.,-.2, LEVEL 1 ELEV 100' - 0" film filth T.O. STAIR PAFPEA ELEV. 152' - ELEv2-1V0 MMN 1,11 IIID! 111110 "NW RH • ENE .P. I RIMINI LEVEL 2 LEV=118'-0r SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 RH EDINA A3 NORTH ELEVATION 03.14.2019 T.O. STAIR PARAPETA. ELEV . 152' - 0"sT ELEv 9 ELEV .118' - EL 1 EL& —1-EV10C SCALE: 1 /1 6" = 1 '-0" RH EDINA RH A4 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 WEST ELEVATION EDINA 03.14.2019 T.O. STAIR PARAPET ELE/ LEVEL 34 ELEV 30 • II EMI 1111 O• • 111111 011111111 Miln 1111111111 11111111M -1111111 II LEVEL 2 AI ELEV 118' - LEVEL 1A, ELEV 100' - 0"Y SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 03.14.2019 RH A5 EAST ELEVATION EDINA SOUTH PERSPECTIVE A6 RI--I EDINA RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 03.14.2019 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (14'-0" AFF 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (14'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (14'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x (VARIES) 8' - 0" 14' -5" x 35' - 7" (14'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x (VARIES) 8' - 0" 15' - 6" x (VARIES) 8' - 0" 15' - 6" x 13' - 0" (12'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x 11' - 8" (14'-0" AFF) (VARIES) 13' - 0" x 20' -1" (14'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" x 20' - 6" (12'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" x 20' - 1" (14'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" x 20' - 6" (12'-0" AFF) 37' - 11" x 73' -11 1/2" (14'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x (VARIES) 8' - 0" 8 - 0" x 10' - 0" (12'-0" AFF) x 16' - 5' (12'-0 F) 27' - 6" x 5' - 0" 6' - 0" x 16' - 6' (12'-0' AFF) 13' - 0" 19' - 6" x (VARIES) 8' - 0" 48' - 6" r (14'-0" AFF) J= 13' - 0" x (VARIES) 8' - 0" _r= x (VARIES 8' - 0" r 19' - 6" 48' - 6" (14'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" 18' - 91/2" (14'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" x 18' - 9 1/2" (12'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" x 18' - 9 1/2" (12'-0" AFF) 13' - 0" x 18' - 91/2" (14'-0" AFF) x 47' - 7 1/2" x 19' - 9" (14'-0" AFF) mmmmommmi—olim inommireisimmiums 111111111111 " I h alai mi I= rim Wja =I Em 47' - 71/2" x 19' - 9" (14'-0" AFF) 7177417' 6 SCALE: 1/16" = 1,-0" RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 A7 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 14' - 5" x 35' - 7" (14'-0" AFF) 37' - 11" x 32' - 4" (14'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x 11' - 7" (14'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (12'-0" AFF EDINA 03.14.2019 13' - 0" 20'X 1" (12'-a" AF 37' -11" 73' - 111/2" (12'-8" AFF) to° tie 19' - 6" 48' - 9" (12'-8" AFF) 713' - 0" x (VARIE'. - 0" 13' - 0" 20x- 6" (12'-0" AFF) - 0" x (VARIES 0" " 13' - 0" 20' - 6" (12'-0" AFF) 137" x (VARIES) ,_$' - 0" r. 13' - 0" 20' - 0" AFF) 3 - 0" 19' - 6" (VARIES) 3' - x 0" 48x- 9" r (12'-8" AFF) A8 EDINA SECOND FLOOR PLAN RH EDINA 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 140'-0" 03.14.2019 15' - 6" x 13' - 0" (12'-0" AFF) 15' - 6" x 11' - 8" (12'-8" AFF) O 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (12'-8" AFF) 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (12'-8" AFF) 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (12'-8" AFF 1 15' - 6" x (VARIES 8' - 0" 1 , 15' - 6" x 11' - 7" (12'-8" AFF) 37' -11" x 32' -4" (12'-8" AFF) 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (12'-0" AFF) Will BREAK R002 LEADER OFFIGF (10'-0" 8'-8" -10" 6' - 0" x 6' - 5" 12' FF) 7 - 15' - 6" x 13' - 2" (12'-b" AFF) L 5' - 6" 14' - 5" 15' - 6" 8,X0„ (VARIES) 35,X7" 8x0„ (VARIES) ti r (12'-8" AFF) L. STORAG 6 - 0" 16'X6" (12'- AFF) )\' )41ATUIEI= 8' - 8" x 13' -11" (10'- AFF ELE A\ic t: AFF)1 I 10' )-(0" 27' -6" (12'-0" AFF) 5' -0" j15' - 6" L 14' - 5" 8' - o" (VARIES) 35,x_ 7,. X r 4 ,.. (12'-8„ AFF) (10'-0" AFF1 20' - 2" 16'X5" (12'-0" AFF) x 5' - 0" O in 13' - 0" 19' - 0 1/2" 1,1L- . 1 1 1 I 1- 1 .1 - 1 1 1__ 13' - 0" 19' - 0 1/2" (12'-8" AFF 1 .1 -1 1 1 I. 1 II 1 1 - -"r-) 7 ti SCALE: 1/16" = 13' - 0" 19' - 01/2" (12'-8" AFF) - 1 I 1 I I 1 1- 1 1 1:: I 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 13' - 0" 19' - 01/2" (12'-8" AFF) (EXP.),,‘ (cl'-10" AFF) 21 -1 7/16' (cr-10" AFF) 9' - 9" 21' - 6 1/2" x (GI 10" AFF) 5'-S„ a1I Ili Ill III ill [II III III III JI III III ql 1.11 111 111 TfT : 71 : : : I II: : : IIC : alr fT -1 Tom= • T L_ 86' - 9" (q-2" AFF) 15' - 91/2" ao COI r I 12L5wit 0" 7 .44 1 H -6" AFF) PANTRY/WINE BAR '---41--44-431 36' -10" x (q'-1O" AFF) /11111=11111111.+1 — -a — — (10'-0" AFF) (EXP.) tea I L_ (EXP.) 0 01 CAFE ti L —E OR TDO RRA (VARIES)- • • r . • . • • • 111111111111 lu II mid I III lI II III II 011 IP III III 11 III II IF II ul SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 6801 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 RH EDINA RI---1 ROOF PLAN A9 EDINA 03.14.2019 The CITY of EDINA Restoration Hardware-6801 France Avenue South Conditional Use Permit The CITY of EDINA6801 France Avenue South www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINARecommended approval is subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: •The proposed rooftop dining is not in close proximity to existing residential uses. •The proposal meets the conditional use permit criteria in Section 36-612 of the City Code. Conditions: •Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. •Amplified sound shall be subject to the city’s noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city code. •The rooftop dining area will be kept in a clean and orderly manner. •Service of alcoholic beverage requires the applicant to obtain appropriate liquor licenses in compliance with Edina Code Section 4 and Minnesota Statute 340A. •Required fencing shall meet the Minnesota State Building Code and must be reviewed and approved by the Building Department at the time of building permit. •Lighting shall meet the requirements in Section 36-1260 of City Code. •The rooftop dining area shall be constructed per the plans date stamped March 19, 2019. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Draft Comprehensive P lan update and authorize staff to release to adjacent municipalities, and affected agencies for their 6-month review. INTRODUCTION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 24, 2019, and recommended the City Council approve the Draft Plan, subject to modifications agreed upon by the Commission in the Responses to Comments Report dated April 18, 2019, and authorize release to adjacent communities and agencies for review. Vote: 8 Ayes, and 1 Nay. To review the draft comprehensive plan please visit: https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6290/City-of-Edina-Comprehensive-P lan-2018-Draft-PDF ATTACHMENTS: Description Response to Comments Report Appendix Staff Presentation: May 7, 2019 Meeting Handout 2018 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan Update Responses to Comments Reports Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Prepared by: Biko Associates, Inc. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Cornejo Consulting Economic Development Services, Inc. Griffin Design, LLC April 18, 2019 Page 1-1 I. Introduction Background The draft 2018 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan was published on March 7, 2019 and uploaded to Better Together Edina, a website developed by the City to receive comments and input on a range of City projects and activities, including the draft Comprehensive Plan. The formal Comment Period was opened on March 7 and was closed on April 8, 2019. Comments received on the draft plan during this 30-day period were reviewed and analyzed by the City of Edina Planning Commission, and responses, documented in this report, were developed for each comment. Comments received after the formal Comment Period ended were also reviewed and analyzed. Responses, however, are not documented in this report. Purposes 30-Day Comment Period and Better Together Edina The 30-day Comment Period was implemented to obtain input from Edina residents on the draft Comprehensive Plan. Residents who accessed Better Together Edina to review the draft plan document were asked one question for each of the plan’s 15 chapters and four small area plans that were prepared as part of the Comprehensive Plan planning process. That question was: What change would you suggest to make to improve this chapter? A single and brief question? Yes, but intentionally asked to not steer respondents but, instead, to encourage them to read the chapter (or small area plan), study it, give it thought and consideration, and, without guidance or suggestions, determine: • How they feel • If additional information is needed to make points more clear • If data are accurate, supportable, or reasonable • If there is agreement or disagreement with goals and policy directions In total, 95 comments were submitted during the 30-day Comment Period. The City learned that Better Together Edina is an excellent vehicle for posting information about its initiatives and projects and that the volume of responses received from residents is higher than it has ever been. There were 1,560 visits to Better Together Edina to review the draft plan and small area plans, and, of these, 107 visitors downloaded draft comprehensive plan chapters and/or the small area plans. Additionally, 33 others submitted questions in the FAQ section of the site. A chart showing the daily distribution of visitors to Better Together Edina to view the draft plan and small area plans follows on the next page. Page 1-2 Proposed Amendments to the Draft Comprehensive Plan As hoped, Edina residents demonstrated their thoughtful review of the draft plan’s chapters and the small area plan documents and provided questions, comments, and suggestions ranging from grammatical corrections, questions about analysis assumptions and conclusions, to agreements and disagreements about the City’s goals and policy directions. Based on the Planning Commission’s review, 50 (53 percent) of the 95 comments received were identified as those that would improve the draft Comprehensive Plan. This report documents those comments as proposed amendments to the Draft Comprehensive Plan and will be before the Commission for approval at its April 24 Public Hearing on the 2018 Draft Comprehensive Plan. The next chapter of this report details those comments. Community Engagement An important element of the comprehensive planning process was community engagement, which included: workshops, Small open houses and community meetings held for the small area plans and the Southdale District Plan, pop-up information-sharing events, Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings on the small area plans and Southdale District Plan, and an open house event for the Draft Comprehensive Plan. Comments and input received from residents through Better Together Edina is an additional community engagement activity. This report was prepared to document the comments that were received through Better Together Edina and responses that were developed. It is a report that is available to the public that will give residents an opportunity to see how their questions, comments, and suggestions were treated and how their input has contributed to the development of the draft plan. An appendix to this report includes all 95 comments received through Better Together Edina. March 7, 2019 April 8, 2019 Page 2-1 II. Proposed Amendments to the 2018 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Organization The 50 comments identified a proposed amendments to the 2018 Draft Comprehensive Plan are organized by chapter. Respecting the anonymity of the individuals who submitted comments, no identifying information is included in this report. Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment 2. Community Profile 1 High Property Values Are a Positive Not a Negative The document throughout treats high property values as an obstacle or problem. They are the opposite. High values reflect Edina’s desirability. They attract high-value, high-skill residents. They allow retirees to downsize with money to spare or to fund retirement with home sales. The Draft uses the misleading term “affordability” to cast high values as something to be overcome. High values reflect high-value businesses, great schools, ample amenities, low crime, and good neighbors. The Draft should have as a goal to increase property values as much as possible throughout Edina. High values reflect a glaring fact the Draft ignores: Edina is an intentional community. Edinans, by and large, choose Edina. They plan and save and work to live here. This intentionality, and the high values it produces, is the magic of Edina – we want to be here, we worked hard to get here, we place a very high value in living here with all that Edina offers, and we work hard to keep it excellent and make it better. We have “skin in the game.” The Draft laments that Edinans spend a higher percentage of income on housing – that’s because Edinans place a higher value on living in a great community and they are willing to spend more of their income to do it. That is the common bond that links us in Edina. Allowing housing for people who do not place such a high priority on it fundamentally disrupts Edina. Chapter will be reviewed to ensure property value references are treated neutrally. 5 Morningside area is cut off in figure 2.5 Map will be adjusted. 3: Land Use & Community Design 7 "...an increased interest in mixed-use/live-work scenarios." Whose interest? How has this been determined? Provide language and data from Vision Edina process to support this. 7 "Additionally, younger residents who are now reaching adulthood have shown interest in different land use patterns, in particular, better connected mixed-use districts." What is the basis for this statement? It may be true, but how true is it? What data from Edina supports it? Provide data as to housing preferences from Vision Edina process. 9 First and second bullet points under top paragraph: What does this mean? Add more explanatory language regarding content and purpose of comprehensive amendments Page 2-2 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment 9 Reference to "Grandview Heights" in bottom paragraph. Delete "Heights." Make change as requested. 10 "Long known as a retail center for the southwest metro area, Edina also contains prime office space whose occupants include several large corporations." Use of "whose" -- rephrase to "occupants of which include several large corporations. Prime office space -- I have been told there is no class A office space, or very little. Is it prime office space? Several large corporations – vague. This is an example of a sentence that doesn't say much because it is too general. These should be cut, because all they really add are words, or rephrased. Rephrase sentence to be more specific, based on Economic Competitiveness chapter's evaluation of office market. 10 "Richards" is included in list of golf courses but is no longer a golf course. Delete. Make change as requested. 10 Railway paragraph. I have only heard residents refer to the rail line as CP or Dan Patch, not Soo Line, so I don't know that "Soo Line" is how it is known locally. Clarify name of rail line, including as it is known locally. 11 "However, this is not always allowed under ordinance or encouraged by policy. An example of this situation could be a location where land values may make it economically feasible to develop at a scale beyond what is allowed under city policy and regulation." How true is this? What specific city policy or regulation? Since the council can change city policy and regulations to allow for developments, and that is what they do, why not say that instead? Reword as requested. 11 Is Edina double counting Fred Richards and/or Braemar as both a Parks and Rec area and Golf Course area? I'm referring specifically to this snippet: "Parks and Recreation. Edina has an extensive public park system that serves the community and area residents. Parklands include a golf course … Golf Course. Edina has four major golf courses located in these public parks and private country clubs: Braemar, Interlachen, Richards, and Edina." Should there be a statement on the City's commitment to the golf course? 23 Table 3.5 and others: source of data not provided. Should be provided. Add data sources to tables. 25 Weber Woods is guided as low density residential. It was discussed to be a dog park and storm water facility--essentially stay open space. When did it change to low density residential? Make adjustment to map as discussed with City staff. 37 1 and 3 under Principles -- rephrase so both are easily understandable. 1 under Guidelines -- "Recent zoning changes have PARTIALLY addressed this issue." Add "partially." Make changes as requested 43 In general, goals are not succinct and clearly actionable. It is better to have fewer, tighter, more actionable goals. The plan will be edited for clarity and conciseness. 44 Reference the Implementation chapter for implementation steps. Add reference as requested 20 This sentence has a big message but I don't believe it is phrased correctly: "For the purposes of transportation planning, it is an indicator of where development can support non-motorized modes such as transit."Transit, as I think of it, is motorized. Examples would be LRT, buses, and streetcars. These all are Correct phrasing as requested. Page 2-3 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment multiple passenger forms of transit which work better in areas of higher density. This is a very convoluted process for obtaining public input on the comp plan. It is a full time job to try and review then cite all the specific pages of each particular chapter to comment. If this is how residents are to supply input, then this review period should be extended to 6 months at minimum. Thirty days is not sufficient. There is not adequate time to make detailed comments in this format in a timely and efficient manner. I would recommend a different format be utilized for something as broad as public input on the entire comprehensive plan. With that said, with regard to land use, zoning and density, I have major concerns with the increased density across many areas, particularly the areas indicated as change areas. The city of Edina is designated as Urban, not urban core or urban center. An Urban designated city, per Met Council, is to have an average density per developable acre of 10. The proposed increased density in this new comprehensive plan is an average density of 20 units per developable acre. That is DOUBLE what it should be as an Urban area. Twenty units per acre is consistent with an Urban Center designation, which the City of Edina is not. This absolutely needs to be reduced or it will have negative impact on market sustainability and infrastructure, artificially inflates values, impacts taxes and affordability, can lead to future instability in the marketplace, and is inconsistent with an Urban designation. We should not be doubling the recommended density. Comprehensive metro-wide planning occurs for a reason and we as a city should not be exceeding recommendations. In addition, the city has already exceeded the Met Council projections for needed housing units by the year 2040. By rough count, we have added approximately 1700+ multi-family housing units and the projected need, per Met Council, is 1595 by 2040! We are well over that number already. If we continue to allow developers to triple and quadruple units per acre on future development, we will have a complete saturation of market which will have a negative affect on property value across the city, could lead to high vacancy rates, and many of these new developments are funded with TIF, which if continued at the proposed allowed pace and density, could ultimately result in a negative outcome for the tax payer and residents on their investment. The plan includes an increase of multi-family zoning and a loss of office/retail/commercial/industrial acreage. I am concerned at the loss of land for economic development opportunities that would otherwise sustain a greater population growth, higher rents and sale prices that go along with inflated values. I think this needs to be addressed and accounted for, and revised to ensure we maintain and promote adequate opportunity for economic development, not just low paying, becoming-obsolete-retail. The average rent, per the plan, of the new developments exceeds the incomes of the renters who are living in these areas. This is NOT sustainable development. We MUST consider economic development as an equal means.Also, there are serious infrastructure concerns. The congestion that will result with the density proposed cannot be managed with current infrastructure. There is also no where for infrastructure to expand with the current plan. We must take this into consideration before it results in the need for eminent domain. The plan does not account for the expansion of infrastructure in any way, shape or form. This MUST be a part of the comprehensive plan, but it is not. We need to consider and add this. This will have a huge impact on quality of life as well. My final comment here is my concern for the ultimate lack of form-based planning. If we remove specific building height restrictions and give developers broad ability to densify areas without proper controls, we lose our ability to effectively manage development to ensure it fits in a long term comprehensive plan. By removing such specificity from the plan, we set a precedent for uncontrollable development and outcomes. Amendments and variances are granted for a reason - to maintain The plan will be available for public review and comment during a six month period starting later this year. This initial review is just to prepare the plan for its initial release for wider review. The density ranges included in this plan are the result of small area plans that were recently completed through community-based processes and adopted by the City Council. They represent participants' vision of what is appropriate for these areas in terms of desired development. Employment is expected to grow at a slower rate than residential, based on regional forecasts, and growth patterns have been adjusted accordingly. Add reference to Economic Competitiveness chapter, which outlines approach to Page 2-4 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment the ability to properly govern and control development that is in the best interest of the city, its residents and businesses. If we remove that control, we no longer have the ability as a city to adequately plan for the future and ensure outcomes can be managed effectively. Please take these issues seriously. The future of our city depends on it! economic development. Height restrictions are not being removed. They will be maintained largely as is within the city's zoning code. They were removed from the comprehensive plan to make it more straightforward to modify them in the future as needed, without needing a comprehensive plan amendment. 25 These pages (25-35) should be revised to reflect the lower maximum dwelling units per acre and the new Mixed Used designation adopted by the Council on April 2. Update numbers and calculations to reflect most updated density ranges 2 Table 3.1 shows data from MSP Thrive as of January 2019. This table shows population growing from 47,941 in 2010 to 63, ,600 in 2040 or 33% growth. When I visit the official Met Council Thrive website it shows (as of January 1, 2019) the population growing from 47,941 in 2010 to 59,600 in 2040 or 24% growth. I know the Met Council will revise their forecast based on input from the local government so I am assuming the City Council requested this upward revision in the projected population. These numbers drive the Comp Plan so it would be great to have an explanation of this change. There seems to be a general argument being made that the Comp Plan is the City's response to how it will manage its fair share of the regional growth. If in fact the City has successfully requested higher population growth than the MET Council originally projected, this should be clearly pointed out and the reasons why clearly explained. These forecasts have been revised based on mutual agreement between the City and Metropolitan Council. Additional language will be added to clarify that in this section. 21 Reference to Grandview Development Framework (2012). It is not a SAP and was not included in the SAPs attached to this document. Will it be incorporated by reference? If yes, why, when it is not a SAP and when there has been significant public input on the area since? Edina resident Stephanie Mullaney prepared and submitted a consolidation of public input related to Grandview. It should be included along with the Framework if the Framework is included. Clarify that Grandview plan referenced here is a development framework, not a small area plan 22 Figure 4.4: North France Avenue was listed as a potential area of change in the 2008 comp plan. It is not shown as a potential area of change in the 2018 draft. Some explanation would be appropriate. Small area plan covered the area where change is Page 2-5 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment occurring. Will evaluate the need to study North France Avenue in the future, with potential development of E Line. 27 Table 3.6 -- "maximum FAR per zoning code" It would help to know what zoning districts correspond to which land use categories, and also how this relates to PUD. Remove references to FAR from chapter. Zoning districts may be changed or amended based on the comprehensive plan, so there is not a full correspondence between districts and land use designations. 41 Building Placement and Design -- need illustrations to show what this means. General comment -- photos should be labeled. what are they illustrating? Adding graphics illustrating building placement and design, as well as captions where needed to explain point 4: Housing 3 Use of the word "currently." Some data 3 years old. Is it current? Change to "as of this writing" or similar. Revised text as suggested 1 "The City of Edina has taken proactive steps regarding affordability via its Housing Succession Plan and the subsequent adoption of its Affordable Housing Policy, but evaluation is needed to determine if this is sufficient." Housing Succession Plan was from 2005. Was it reviewed for relevance? Was it enacted? Remove, or if left in, add date. Add date to Affordable Housing Policy. It is now renamed. Note that it is limited in scope to inclusionary affordable housing. Revised text as suggested 2 Most of my changes are suggestions to improve accuracy or clarity. I support the overall themes of the chapter. I am especially pleased with how it incorporates affordable housing. p 4.2 The change in population from 2020 to 2040 per the bar chart is +8,600 or 15.6% not +5,800 or 24% as stated in the text p 4.5 Please define the "Twin Cities Region" as (the 7 county greater metropolitan area) in the box on Definition - affordability. Using this broad area to define AMI has significant implications. p4.6 I don't know if you can change Table 4.1 as it comes from the Metropolitan Council but it could be improved. The total should appear at the top of each subsection as it does in the first two subsections. In the the third subsection the total is at the bottom. The Housing units subsection has two further subsections Make changes as requested to increase clarity Page 2-6 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment that both total to the overall total. The use of bold dividing lines or an additional blank row might help the readability of this chart. P4.6 Table 1 shows a total number of affordable units at 7,525. Later in Table 4.4 there is a goal cited of 1220 affordable units. I have heard at City Council and Planning Commission meetings that our number of affordable units is more like 994. The disconnect between the 7525 number and the much smaller numbers shown later must be explained. p4.11 Please explain what is meant by the parenthetical expression (formally and informally) related to high density housing in the second to last sentence p4.12 Please explain what is meant by the term "value capture" in the sentence: In general Edina needs approaches that are focused on value capture of current and forecasted growth. This may be familiar jargon in the planning world but it is not to me. P4.12 The last sentence ends with: addressing the barriers to creating affordable housing such as zoning restrictions. Would it help to provide an example of this type of zoning restriction in parentheses? p4.13 Please provide a definition of congregate housing. p4.14 In the section on Missing Middle housing please repeat the list of examples you provided in the first section on page 4.12. This is an important concept so the repetition will help ensure people understand it. p4.15 "Live and work" - Is Centennial Lakes a model for this concept - ie housing in close proximity to office buildings and retail workplaces. If it is then list it as an example. p4-15 There is a new multifamily affordable housing policy. Should this be included in this section about the City's Affordable Housing policy p4.16 Here is an example of some language that occurs through the remainder of this chapter: "Housing for young families, including first-time homebuyers. The strength of the school district in Edina attracts families with school aged children. There will be a continued need for housing options that work for families, including affordably priced ones." The latest demographic study for the school system pointed out that the type of housing with the highest yield for students was the most expensive single family homes (+$750,000). Hazel made the point that families with kids are now often older than in earlier generations. We should be careful that this document does not perpetuate concepts that are not borne out in the latest demographic data. (young families/first home buying families are the source for kids for the school. While certainly true as a general statement, in Edina it may be that middle age move-up families are the primary source for kids in school) p4.17 Again reconcile the disconnect between chart 4.4 and chart 4.1 on p4.6 p4.19 Under Goal 1, section 3. e there is the sentence : Providing lifecycle housing opportunities for community renewal. I am not sure what this means. I understand the idea of housing for each part of someone's life cycle but the link to community renewal is a little vague. Does this mean: we want to ensure that there are always sufficient housing options for each lifecycle stage so that with each new generation we can start the lifecycle journey over again? p4.19 Goal 2 Point 2 Please add the NOAH acronym at the end. (so it becomes familiar) p4.20 Goal 3 Point 4 - This is another NOAH idea but is it realistic given all the forces driving the teardown trend. There may be a more specifc subset of lower square footage housing that can be identified and preserved because tearing down is not financially attractive (ie very small or undesirable lot.) Thank you for providing this feedback tool! Page 2-7 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment 1 I would like to see a greater emphasis on the links between housing policy and climate change throughout this and the Land Use chapter. A recent NYTimes article, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opinion/california-home-prices-climate.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage points out that according to recent research, higher densities not only facilitate affordable housing development, they also support public transportation that reduces greenhouse gas emissions from cars. Research showed that the impact of housing policies had a greater effect on reducing carbon emissions than the promotion of electric cars. Insisting that Edina maintain its disproportionate land use devoted to solely to low and very low density single family home neighborhoods raises land prices, reduces housing affordability, inhibits/prevents the development of public transit, and increases car traffic and greenhouse gas emissions. (And the same people who oppose higher density hate increased traffic.) Higher densities and mixed use developments are fine near existing public transit lines but we need to promote the possibility of higher densities in single family residential areas as well. (You could easily get four housing units in to a new McMansion not far from my house in the Concord neighborhood). Otherwise we'll never meet our growing need for affordable housing or build out public transit fast enough to meet the urgent challenge of climate change. Add language to the plan regarding the role housing policy has in supporting sustainability goals, with reference to Energy & Environment chapter 27 First, there needs to be a definition of "senior housing". Do you mean different housing models for older adults, or age-segregated housing? I have led several discussions about housing options with the "baby boomer" generation (of which I am one). It appears that traditional age-segregated "senior housing" is not favored by many in this very large cohort--unless there is some need for special services with the housing.. Most I've talked to value a more natural, multigenerational "neighborhood" setting either by aging in place in their own homes, or in, for example, co-housing communities. I would strongly suggest that the City have a conversation with "seniors" before building more age-segregated senior housing. I think many boomers want out of that box! Add definition of senior housing to cover the range of housing options typically given this title. Senior housing, in various forms, has been identified repeatedly as a priority for Edina as existing residents transition from single family homes. 1 Data Is Suspect: The data is in many places suspect, particularly in the Housing section. That section uses Census tract data to calculate average home prices and incomes. This is wildly off the mark. The tract where I live, 239.03, has a “hard division” of street grid between 2 dramatically different land uses. East is large multi-family apartment buildings (and commercial) while west is large-lot single-family homes. Yet the home prices and incomes are calculated collectively, with no accounting for this dramatic difference. When I lived in an apartment, I couldn’t possibly have afforded my house – I expect the same is roughly true here. It’s misleading at best and dishonest at worst to claim that housing is too expensive because the average income of apartment-dwellers and homeowners is not enough to buy the homes. We cannot trust any calculations based on this faulty background data. The final Plan must correct this faulty data and faulty use of it. Other bad data includes population projections – The Met Council projects slow growth, up to 53,000 in 2040 (2015 System Statement) yet the Draft projects 63,000, fully 20% higher. From the same source, the Met Council Census tract data are used to provide comparable information to what is in the existing plan. Unfortunately, it is not possible to correct for arbitrary boundaries within commonly available data sets. However, Page 2-8 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment projects need for 878 low- and moderate-income housing units, while the Draft projects 1,220. The Draft uses units per acre as a density measure, when in reality people per acre is a much better measure – a one-bedroom apartment creates much less density than a single-family home with 6 or more people, and that’s magnified where it is a single elderly retiree versus a big busy family, yet the Draft counts both as 1 unit. The Cost Burden tables of 4-8 are estimates made by comparing average cost of housing in an area with average income. That’s hogwash. If I have a modest home and a small income and my neighbor has an expensive mansion and a huge income, averaging both incomes and housing costs might show that both of us are “experiencing cost burden” when in fact neither of us are. citywide data show similar patterns related to affordability. The projections used here have been revised upwards from the 2015 System Statement, based on mutual agreement between the City and Metropolitan Council. While this is stated elsewhere in the plan, it will be added here as well for clarification Units per acre are used as a baseline because of Metropolitan Council requirements. This is also reflected in city zoning. However, population forecasts are also included, as they are more relevant to identifying needs for services like schools and parks. The cost burden tables are based on HUD and Metropolitan Council analysis of Census microdata, which pairs households and incomes. It is not based just on averages in these Page 2-9 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment areas. Information about how this is calculated can be added to the plan for clarification. 11 The topic of walk-ability is mentioned. Can you tell where your data came from that Edina residents want improved walk-ability from what we currently have? Edina is mostly a community of sprawling single family neighborhoods with land. It's Edina's proximity to urban areas, while maintaining quiet residential neighborhoods with larger lots that is one of the reasons for it's high demand. Add reference to feedback from prior planning efforts, including Vision Edina and the recent bicycle/pedestrian plan 17 "The strength of the school district in Edina attracts families with school aged children." Your arguments for affordable housing follow this sentence. But in reality, neighborhoods are currently turning over to younger families without any affordable housing measures driving the turnover. Young families are buying homes and tearing them down or buying newly built teardowns in combinations with buying existing homes. The young families that are moving to Edina can afford the homes being sold. Elementary schools are not seeing a decline in local enrollments. Add reference to regional data regarding income levels, including feedback from residents that family members are unable to find housing here 6 I'm very concerned about affordable housing, as a member of Edina's Affordable Housing Group under chair Hope Melton. Why doesn't NOAH include ownership rather than just rental as part of the category? Is there any way to stop teardowns in East Edina that bring about "McMansions"? I think it is important that officials focus on need heavily, and minimally on residents' preferences. Granted City Council is elected and must respond to people who voted for them, but they also have a larger responsibility to the community at large.. I think this needs to be pointed out to the "naysayers" regarding affordable housing. Add clarifications as needed that NOAH includes both rental and ownership housing. Housing afffordability will be discussed in more detail in follow-up housing study 26 Is there any way to increase the categories of financing that would deal with 30% of AMI? There seems to be only spot where that percentage comes up. Many of the jobs in the Greater Southdale area are service jobs that would fit into this category of income. Many of these tools are intended to cover levels of affordability up to 80% AMI, inclusive of 30%. Add language that clarifies that point. 16 I would like to see more discussion of affordable home ownership for the young families mentioned on page 16. Affordable rental units, especially those at the 30%, 50% and 60% level, are greatly needed. However it is Add more discussion on these points as Page 2-10 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment also desirable to have ownership options, and these need not all be single-family detached homes. Duplexes, triplexes and condominiums can also be part of the affordable home ownership mix. indicated 10 Add to household types that need specialized housing: childless couples, single professionals, empty nesters. There is a need to a different type of housing for these groups who do not want to be in a multi-unit building. The concept of ADUs (Accessory Development Units) or "Granny Flats" who provide a smaller square footage single family home that would allow a more affordable dwelling type as it could be built on the same property as a single family home. Minneapolis has successfully implemented this housing type. They could also be rented under specific guidelines such as requiring the lessor to live in the main house on the property. This would be a great options for families who want to care for their senior parents. Add household types as indicated. The plan already includes a recommendation to consider the possibility of allowing ADUs in the future 1 'General comments about the chapter: Most info is surface level. Wish the city would have drilled down more to identify the types of housing that fit specific needs in the community, whether housing with services, senior coop, or other. --Related, I wish the chapter would have looked at how housing stock shapes a community. For example, how the ratio of owner-occupied to rental housing is shifting as more rental units are being constructed. As a higher percentage of residents are renting, what impacts does that have (sure some research has been done on this). I wish the chapter would have looked at property taxes and TIF. The property tax burden is primarily borne by residential property owners (non apartments). The number of new developments in TIF districts heightens this. Related, I wish the chapter would have looked at how property taxes are burdening many who live in more affordable homes--especially in areas where there have been teardown/rebuilds. Also, how special assessments can burden property owners. Those in modest properties pay a high percentage of their home's value in special assessments. Edina's reliance on the tax capacity of residential properties (non apartments) means that it has an interest in increasing values, which can work against goals for affordability. Edina's reliance on revenue from special assessments for road reconstruction means those in more modest homes are generally more burdened than those in more expensive homes. The chapter would have been both more interesting, and more useful, if it had dug into these issues. Overall, it is too wordy. Cut as much as possible. Put as much as possible into tables, charts, maps, etc. and minimize narrative. Add examples of housing types in response to identified needs Additional topics related to affordability will be covered in a follow-up housing study. Include cross references to Economic Competitiveness chapter. 1 Conclusion: The Draft, if followed, will fundamentally change Edina to be bigger, busier, more congested, more polluted, and poorer. Edina’s family neighborhoods of single-family homes that parents have worked hard and highly prize, will largely be overwhelmed, politically and by the externalities, of the 20% population increase, consisting largely of people who don’t necessarily want to live in Edina but for whom it just happens to be convenient and cheap. This will be particularly galling to the prosperous families who paid high taxes to subsidize the growth, while those same high taxes undercut the price of homes and drive seniors out of their lifelong family homes. I would urge a different path of preserving the predominance of high-value single-family homes, allowing the free market to produce new housing at prices set by the collective action of the market, and to increase the price of existing homes as it has in past decades, so that Edina maintains a population of people who intentionally choose to live and invest in Edina. Growth should return to historic levels, not the inflated levels of the past 5 years, continuing to 2040 and beyond. I would urge a clear and unequivocal statement that Edina’s taxpayers will not bear the burden of alleviating regional problems, and that Edina will not compromise its building and zoning standards solely to socially engineer the income levels of building residents. Clarify the role and benefits of affordable housing to the community, based on City Council direction and adopted policy. Clarify that single family neighborhoods are guided to remain largely the same, according to this comprehensive plan. Page 2-11 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment 5: Transportation 1 I can supply a Word document with changes marked, if requested. Summary of changes: 1. DOT's system is known as "intercity", so the parentheses should be reversed. 2. The sentence at the end of the first paragraph clarifies the intercity rail concept. 3. At the start of the third paragraph, "commuter" was changed to "light". The interest of residents was in exploring light rail concepts, not heavy, hazardous commuter rail. 4. The recommendation was that the City not continue the study, so so "not to" was changed to "that the City not". 5. The paragraph added at the end recognizes other's efforts that may have a significant effect on transportation planning in Edina. The changed text: Passenger Rail MnDOT’s 2015 update to the Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Rail Plan guides the future of both freight and intercity (passenger) rail systems and rail services in the state. While there is no specific mention of Edina, the plan generally provides strong support for increased investment in passenger rail as a response to growing congestion on highways serving the metropolitan area and exurban communities. The Rail Plan identifies a passenger rail line that extends from the Twin Cities to Northfield that would pass through the City of Edina by way of the Canadian Pacific Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway (CP MN&S) subdivision. This corridor is also known as the Dan Patch Corridor and is identified as a Phase 1 project in the plan. This identification indicates it is a desirable project within a 0- to 20-year (2015 - 2035) implementation horizon. Intercity rail is a concept for express service between Minneapolis and Northfield with fast, heavy trains moving through Edina and other communities with no stops along the way. A study conducted in 2002 examined the feasibility of establishing commuter rail service along the Dan Patch corridor. At that time, responding to opposition from residents, former State Representative Ron Erhardt introduced legislation that would prohibit state and regional agencies from spending any money to study, plan or design a commuter rail line in this corridor. This legislation, which was passed and has been referred to as the "gag order," applies to state agencies and affected Regional Railroad Authorities but not cities. Based on interest in light rail expressed by Edina residents, the City in 2017 conducted a study to gauge public support for passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor through Edina. The majority of public feedback was not supportive of passenger rail in the corridor; particularly noted are comments coming from residents who live along the route. The study, which is documented in the Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report, concluded with a recommendation that the City not pursue passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor at that time. The City may benefit from interest in light rail by other communities, particularly Savage, which sees a light rail crossing of the Minnesota River and connection to Southwest Light Rail as a means to relieve congestion on the US Highway 169 bridge. Light rail concepts being considered are less noisy and safer than heavy alternatives such as intercity and commuter rail, can be implemented quickly, and will cost a small fraction of recent Twin Cities light rail projects. If implemented, a light rail system between Saint Louis Park and Savage along the Dan Patch corridor (with two or three stops in Edina) will have a profound effect on transportation, will stimulate development, and will increase property values along the route The information provided in the Comprehensive Plan is technically accurate. These comments address stylistic preferences. This section will be reviewed and, where appropriate, changes in style will be made. Page 2-12 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources 6 Reference to Fred Richards Golf Course -- it is no longer a golf course. A correction will be made to the Comp Plan that goes to adjacent cities for review and the Met Council. 8 A correction will be made to the Comp Plan that goes to adjacent cities for review and the Met Council. A correction will be made to the Comp Plan that goes to adjacent cities for review and the Met Council 9 Policy 1-C -- will the city also consider purchasing land for park use and/or converting publicly owned land from existing use to park use? If yes, add it. If no, why not? Yes. Policy 1-C should have opened with the following line: “It is the intent of the City to maintain and, when feasible, increase its current park and open space property. 10 Policy 3-A -- what about the parks strategic plan, community center study, parks/recreation data from community surveys, etc. Not clear why only Vision Edina (2015) and Big Ideas Workshop (2017/2018) are referenced as providing guidance when other valuable guidance is found in these other documents. Indeed. Many sources were considered in the development of this plan, and many will help guide recommendations in the future. While Park Master Plans and Small Area Plans are called out in other policy aspects of this goal, it is a miss NOT to also include the Edina P&R Strategic Plan as a core guiding document to future recommendations. Page 2-13 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment This would be a good addition to Policy 3-A in the Parks section. 2 The 2016 population number used is outdated at this point. The 2020 (next year) estimate is 55,000. This works out to about 28.5 acres per 1,000. By 2030, it will be about 26 acres per 1,000 and by 2040 just under 25 acres per person. Yet, there is no policy in this chapter to purchase land for park and open space use when good options become available. Good catch. A line was dropped from the initial draft that should be added back as the opening line of Policy 1-C: “It is the intent of the City to maintain and, when feasible, increase its current park and open space property.” 10 Policy 3-A. What about recommendations in the parks strategic plan, community center study, quality of life surveys, etc. Why only Vision Edina and the Big Ideas workshop. The exclusion of other parks/recreation processes that happened in recent years seems strange. Indeed. Many sources were considered in the development of this plan, and many will help guide recommendations in the future. While Park Master Plans and Small Area Plans are called out in other policy aspects of this goal, it is a miss NOT to also include the Edina P&R Strategic Plan as a core guiding document to future recommendations. This would be a good addition to Policy 3-A in the Parks section 10 Policy 1-C What does it mean to reduce wild life migration away from their natural habitat? This item under the Natural Resources Page 2-14 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment Someone's backyard can be the natural habitat for a coyote, rabbit, raccoon, deer or other urban wildlife. Not sure what this means. section could be stated more clearly. The intent behind this policy is the following: “Wildlife will be nurtured and protected. Animal and bird populations that are considered a threat to public health or safety, or may be considered hazardous to the environment or infrastructure within Edina, will be proactively managed.” We will review for a better statement of the intent. 11 Humans Rights and Relations In the sentence on page 1 below the bullet points, the phrase "One of the aims of this chapter is to ensure that steps are taken to ensure that the City looks at its departments ..." has a redundancy. It should read, "One of the aims of this chapter is to ensure that the City looks at its departments..." The green box contains the "themes" for the chapter, which belong under the section heading, "Trends, Challenges, and Themes." On page 5, the word "increasing" in the third line of the green box should not be capitalized. The percent of population that is white in 2016 in Table 11.1 is 86.5%. On the top of page 4, it says that 85 % of residents are European American - is this a current statistic, i.e., 85% as of 2018 or 2019 (rather than 2016, when 86.5% are white). The last paragraph on page 6 was identified as a "Theme," along with the items in the green box on page 1 . The subheading "theme" has been eliminated so it appears that the last paragraph on page 6 is a "challenge." The text for the "themes" that are contained in the green box on page 1, should be [repeated] on page 6 under a subheading "themes." The suggested language will be incorporated in the version of the Comp Plan that is reviewed by adjacent municipalities, agencies, and the Metropolitan Council. 15 Implementation 31 The last box under "Strategy/Action Steps" Human Rights and Relations Goal 1, which begins, "Task the Human Rights and Relations Commission to develop and implement educational and other related projects..." is the implementation step for Human Rights and Relations Goal 2. This is the only implementation step for Goal 2. The "Strategy /Action Steps" listed for Goal 2, is one of the implementation steps for Goal 3 (the correct implementation step for Goal 2 is currently listed under Goal 1, as previously described). The second "Strategy/Action Step" that is listed for Goal 3, which begins, "Through the normal course of The suggested language will be incorporated in the version of the Comp Plan that is reviewed by adjacent Page 2-15 Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapter Page Comment or Suggestion Proposed Treatment review and modification, departments will evaluate..." is one of the implementation steps for Goal 4. The last "Strategy/Action Step" that is listed for Goal 4, which begins, "Work in strong collaboration with the Edina City Council and Mayor to establish an effective working model for including the perspectives of arts and culture..." is NOT an implementation step for any Human Rights and Relations Goal; this implementation step is for an Arts and Culture goal. There is no Human Rights and Relations Goal 5 nor Goal 6 - these both describe Arts and Culture Goals. Also, there is a typo on page 15-37 in the last box under "Strategy /Action Steps: there needs to be a space between "arts" "and". municipalities, agencies, and the Metropolitan Council. 50th & France Small Area Plan 32 Issue: COLORS IN LEGEND ARE OFF The legend shows BEIGE as "low density residential" and YELLOW as "Low Density Attached Residential. These colors do not correspond to the map. The map appears to be various shades of green. This map and the associated legend will be reviewed and corrected. 34 Pages 34-35 of the SAP should be re-drafted to include the Council's recommendations on April 2 to lower the maximum density and revise the language about when the city should allow heights of over 4 stories. The Council's recommendation has already been included. Page 2-16 This page was intentionally left blank. Page 3-1 III. Appendix Contents Provided on the following pages are all the comments received through Better Together Edina. As shown, the comments were categorized (1 through 6) during the Planning Commission’s review and analysis: 1. Change. The City’s consultant team will incorporate the comment in the version of the draft plan that goes to the Metropolitan Council 2. Potential Change. Incorporate a change to the draft Comprehensive Plan based on direction from the Planning Commission. 3. No Change. Do not incorporate the comment or change and explain why. 4. No Change. Refer the comment to the appropriate City Commission or staff to consider outside the Comprehensive Planning process. 5. No Change. The Comprehensive Plan does not address this level of detail and a follow-up study will be conducted after the Comprehensive Planning process is completed. 6. No Change. This question has already been answered. This comment is a statement. Comments that were categorized as either 1 or 2, described above, are those that are included in the group of Proposed Amendments to the 2018 Draft Comprehensive Plan. These are discussed in Chapter 2 of this report. Comments that were categorized as 3, 4, 5, or 6 are included in the Appendix. Explanations are provided to show why they were not included as Proposed Amendments. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response1 6Chapter 1: Intro and Vision1 The comprehensive plan is supposed to support the services, infrastructure, public facilities and re/development “in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents...”. The relentless densification of our city, and especially in the Grandview, 50th and 44th small areas is doing just the opposite. Stop the development of any apartments over 4 stories, stop the densification that is clogging our streets and making parking a nightmare. Just stop, please, and ask the residents how much development and degree of density they would like.The plan is consistent with City Council direction for responding to growth and change expected to occur in the city60Chapter 1: Intro and Vision4 No suggestion for change, just an appreciation that the plan sets out to weave education throughout the community rather than just in the schools.74 3Chapter 1: Intro and Vision1 I found the eight principles listed in the vision section of the 50th and France small area plan provided a succinct summary and structure for all that followed. Can you use that same concept to help provide structure to this much larger document? In this Comp Plan document the Mission and Vision statement are followed by lists of ideas with no attempt to synthesize them into guiding principles that the reader will then see reflected or woven into all the following chapters. I personally would recommend that "Provide affordable housing" be one of the ideas or principles that guides the writing. Some of the principles from the 50th and France SAP, like "connectivity", would also seem to be appropriate for the Comp Plan. These are reflected I the "Big Ideas" that are listed and discussed on pages 1-7 through 1-14. The sysnthesis of ideas from the mission statement and vision are discussed in detail in the small area plans that were prepared as part of the process for developing the Comp Plan. The small area plans are the appropriate documents for detailed discussions on these topics. Except for the small area plans, the Comprehensive Plan is largely an update. 81 4 Chapter 2: Community Profile1 Edina Is Delicately BalancedEdina has no big lake or other outstanding natural feature, no dominating corporate headquarters, university, or government building. There’s no fixed factor that keeps Edina a premier community. It could decline at any time, for any one or a combination of factors. Among others, Myron Orfield has studied community “tipping points” and found that it’s easy for a school or city to “tip” from prosperous to declining, and that once it tips, it rarely comes back. An uptick in the crime rate, encroaching noise or traffic, high taxes, loss of employers and any number of other factors can tip a community. Richfield, once Edina’s rival, has now tipped in many areas. Low crime, great schools, high property values, good transportation, and strong neighborhoods keep Edina from tipping. Loss of any of those factors, or an increase in any negatives, risks tipping Edina as well. The central reason Edina stays high-value is the common commitment Edinans share that living in the best possible place carries such a high priority. If Edina loses that shared commitment, Edina tips. The Draft never acknowledges this nor does it analyze it.The contributors to housing value and affordability will be covered in more detail in a follow-up housing study5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met CouncilDraft Comprehensive Plan Public Review2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan3 1 Chapter 2: Community Profile2.5 Morningside area is cut off in figure 2.5Adjust map to show area completely79 1 Chapter 2: Community Profile1 High Property Values Are a Positive Not a NegativeThe document throughout treats high property values as an obstacle or problem. They are the opposite. High values reflect Edina’s desirability. They attract high-value, high-skill residents. They allow retirees to downsize with money to spare or to fund retirement with home sales. The Draft uses the misleading term “affordability” to cast high values as something to be overcome. High values reflect high-value businesses, great schools, ample amenities, low crime, and good neighbors. The Draft should have as a goal to increase property values as much as possible throughout Edina.High values reflect a glaring fact the Draft ignores: Edina is an intentional community. Edinans, by and large, choose Edina. They plan and save and work to live here. This intentionality, and the high values it produces, is the magic of Edina – we want to be here, we worked hard to get here, we place a very high value in living here with all that Edina offers, and we work hard to keep it excellent and make it better. We have “skin in the game.” The Draft laments that Edinans spend a higher percentage of income on housing – that’s because Edinans place a higher value on living in a great community, and they are willing to spend more of their income to do it. That is the common bond that links us in Edina. Allowing housing for people who do not place such a high priority on it fundamentally disrupts Edina. Chapter will be reviewed to ensure property value references are treated neutrally5 4 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design7 "How can the City balance the desire of some residents for larger homes with state-of-the-art features and developers seeking to offer housing units that appeal to today's market, with the interests of neighbors who object to the size and scale of some new construction." Good question, but it frames the issue incorrectly. Smaller homes would also appeal to today's market. Smaller homes can have state-of-the-art features. But developers are choosing to build larger homes, to meet the demands of this segment of the market. For all we know, some people are moving into homes that are larger than what they want, but that is what is available in Edina. Consider a more nuanced framing.This topic will be addressed in a follow-up housing study6 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design7 "...an increased interest in mixed-use/live-work scenarios." Whose interest? How has this been determined? Provide language and data from Vision Edina process to support this.7 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design7 "Additionally, younger residents who are now reaching adulthood have shown interest in different land use patterns, in particular, better connected mixed-use districts." What is the basis for this statement? It may be true, but how true is it? What data from Edina supports it?Provide data as to housing preferences from Vision Edina process. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan8 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design9 First and second bullet points under top paragraph: What does this mean?Add more explanatory language regarding content and purpose of comprehensive amendments9 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design9 Reference to "Grandview Heights" in bottom paragraph. Delete "Heights."Make change as requested10 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design10 "Long known as a retail center for the southwest metro area, Edina also contains prime office space whose occupants include several large corporations."Use of "whose" -- rephrase to "occupants of which include several large corporationsPrime office space -- I have been told there is no class A office space, or very little. Is it prime office space? Several large corporations -- vagueThis is an example of a sentence that doesn't say much because it is too general. These should be cut, because all they really add are words, or rephrased.Rephrase sentence to be more specific, based on Economic Competitiveness chapter's evaluation of office market11 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design10 "Richards" is included in list of golf courses but is no longer a golf course. Delete.Make change as requested12 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design10 Railway paragraph. I have only heard residents refer to the rail line as CP or Dan Patch, not Soo Line, so I don't know that "Soo Line" is how it is known locally.Clarify name of rail line, including as it is known locally13 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design11 "However, this is not always allowed under ordinance or encouraged by policy. An example of this situation could be a location where land values may make it economically feasible to develop at a scale beyond what is allowed under city policy and regulation."How true is this? What specific city policy or regulation? Since the council can change city policy and regulations to allow for developments, and that is what they do, why not say that instead?Reword as suggested14 2 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design21 Reference to Grandview Development Framework (2012). It is not a SAP and was not included in the SAPs attached to this document. Will it be incorporated by reference? If yes, why, when it is not a SAP and when there has been significant public input on the area since? Edina resident Stephanie Mullaney prepared and submitted a consolidation of public input related to Grandview. It should be included along with the Framework if the Framework is included.Clarify that Grandview plan referenced here is a development framework, not a small area plan15 2 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design22 Figure 4.4North France Avenue was listed as a potential area of change in the 2008 comp plan. It is not shown as a potential area of change in the 2018 draft. Some explanation would be appropriate.Small area plan covered the area where change is occurring. Will evaluate the need to study North France Avenue in the future, with potential development of E Line. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan16 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design24 Table 3.5 and others: source of data not provided. Should be provided.Add data sources to tables17 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design25Weber Woods is guided as low density residential. It was discussed to be a dog park and storm water facility--essentially stay open space. When did it change to low density residential?Make adjustment to map as discussed with City staff18 2 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design27 Table 3.6 -- "maximum FAR per zoning code"It would help to know what zoning districts correspond to which land use categories, and also how this relates to PUD.Remove references to FAR from chapter. Zoning districts may be changed or amended based on the comprehensive plan, so there is not a full correspondence between districts and land use designations.19 6 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design1 General comment/question: the chapter does not include building heights. SAPs do. Will height overlay districts map be updated to reflect heights as shown in SAPs? Will height, FAR, density limits in zoning districts be updated to reflect height, FAR, density in tables in this chapter and/or SAPs? If there is a discrepancy between height/FAR/density in SAPs and this chapter, which governs?Building heights are included in small area plans. The only height overlay change resulting from the small area plans will be in the 70th & Cahill area.20 4 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design35 "Public utilities and services have already been extended to all parts of the city, so there is no need to show staging for extension of infrastructure."What about expansion of infrastructure? For example, proposed conversion of DQ office building was rejected due to insufficient water or sewer.Public Works will be undertaking studies of capacity needs where needed.21 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design37 1 and 3 under Principles -- rephrase so both are easily understandable.1 under Guidelines -- "Recent zoning changes have PARTIALLY addressed this issue." Add "partially."Make changes as requested22 2 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design41 Building Placement and Design -- need illustrations to show what this means.General comment -- photos should be labeled. what are they illustrating?Adding graphics illustrating building placement and design, as well as captions where needed to explain point Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan23 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design43 In general, goals are not succinct and clearly actionable. It is better to have fewer, tighter, more actionable goals. The plan will be edited for clarity and conciseness24 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design44 Reference the Implementation chapter for implementation steps.Add reference as requested25 3 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design2 I fundamentally disagree that land use should be based around accommodation of growth – in population, the economy, public services, or anything else. I understand part of this direction is coming from the Met Council and I'll tell them the same thing.When we speak about sustainability, the truly sustainable approach is to have a vision toward a post-growth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-growth) community.Specifically, I'm commenting on this language: "Since a plan to accommodate growth is one of the central functions of this comprehensive plan, this land use element will focus primarily on how this can be accomplished in a way that is sustainable and consistent with overall community goals."This is a baseline assumption of the structure of the comprehensive plan. While there are alternative ways to structure it, that was not the direction given.26 6 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design7 A big "Heck yes!" to this snippet:"Adding walkability and bikeability. Much of Edina was developed during post-WWII decades, when auto-oriented suburbs did not prioritize accommodating pedestrians and bicycles. A transportation network that allows for additional transit and non-motorized travel options increases the movement capacity of the existing public right-of-way and capitalizes on resident needs for more active lifestyles."Thank you for your comment27 6 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design8 7% of total acres in 2016 are for golf courses – the 3rd highest use of space in Edina. In what way does this align with the vision and priorities set in the rest of the draft Comp Plan? At the very least, I would hope that the City would eventually get out of the running of golf courses business. Despite hearing arguments for maintaining the golf course status quo – from financial, environmental, social, or other angles – I'm still left with my eyes bulging at the wasted opportunity that such a commitment of land and resources entails.Comment acknowledged28 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design11 Is Edina double counting Fred Richards and/or Braemar as both a Parks and Rec area and Golf Course area? I'm referring specifically to this snippet:"Parks and Recreation. Edina has an extensive public park system that serves the community and area residents. Parklands include a golf course O Golf Course. Edina has four major golf courses located in these public parks and private country clubs: Braemar, Interlachen, Richards, and Edina."Should there be a statement on the City's commitment to the golf course?72 6 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design3 I think there needs to be a focus on the reason for projected growth. What I hear from Edina citizens is a desire for "no change", "no growth", "stay the way we are". To just say there is "projected growth" is not enough for those folks!The chapter is consistent with city guidance for responding to expected growth and change Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan73 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design39 I'm not seeing much, if anything, that looks innovative in the single-family principles. I notice we want to manage massing in east Edina's smaller lots. What about the large lots in west Edina. There are half-acre+ lots that could accommodate several households. Imagine two large adjacent lots being turned into a cute pocket neighborhood with some shared common space. Right now all the incentives point to redeveloping with 4000+sf homes. How about creating incentives and a mechanism to create some new 1000-1500 sf homes that aren't in highrise buildings?Different housing types will be covered in a follow-up housing study. The current plan generally addresses preserving and strengthening neighborhoods77 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design20 This sentence has a big message but I don't believe it is phrased correctly: "For the purposes of transportation planning, it is an indicator of wheredevelopment can support non-motorized modes such as transit."Transit, as I think of it, is motorized. Examples would be LRT, buses, and streetcars. These all are multiple passenger forms of transit which work better in areas of higher density. Correct sentence phrasing as recommended95 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design1This is a very convoluted process for obtaining public input on the comp plan. It is a full time job to try and review then cite all the specific pages of each particular chapter to comment. If this is how residents are to supply input, then this review period should be extended to 6 months at minimum. Thirty days is not sufficient. There is not adequate time to make detailed comments in this format in a timely and efficient manner. I would recommend a different format be utilized for something as broad as public input on the entire comprehensive plan.With that said, with regard to land use, zoning and density, I have major concerns with the increased density across many areas, particularly the areas indicated as change areas. The city of Edina is designated as Urban, not urban core or urban center. An Urban designated city, per Met Council, is to have an average density per developable acre of 10. The proposed increased density in this new comprehensive plan is an average density of 20 units per developable acre. That is DOUBLE what it should be as an Urban area. Twenty units per acre is consistent with an Urban Center designation, which the City of Edina is not. This absolutely needs to be reduced or it will have negative impact on market sustainability and infrastructure, artificially inflates values, impacts taxes and affordability, can lead to future instability in the marketplace, and is inconsistent with an Urban designation. We should not be doubling the recommended density. Comprehensive metro-wide planning occurs for a reason and we as a city should not be exceeding recommendations.In addition, the city has already exceeded the Met Council projections for needed housing units by the year 2040. By rough count, we have added approximately 1700+ multi-family housing units and the projected need, per Met Council, is 1595 by 2040! We are well over that number already. If we continue to allow developers to triple and quadruple units per acre on future development, we will have a complete saturation of market which will have a negative affect on property value across the city, could lead to high vacancy rates, and many of these new developments are funded with TIF, which if continued at the proposed allowed pace and density, could ultimately result in a negative outcome for the tax payer and residents on their investment. The plan includes an increase of multi-family zoning and a loss of office/retail/commercial/industrial acreage. I am concerned at the loss of land for economic development opportunities that would otherwise sustain a greater population growth, higher rents and sale prices that go along with inflated values. I think this needs to be addressed and accounted for, and revised to ensure we maintain and promote adequate opportunity for economic development, not just low paying, becoming-obsolete-retail. The average rent, per the plan, of the new developments exceeds the incomes of the renters who are living in these areas. This is NOT sustainable development. We MUST consider economic development as an equal means.Also, there are serious infrastructure concerns. The congestion that will result with the density proposed cannot be managed with current infrastructure. There is also no where for infrastructure to expand with the current plan. We must take this into consideration before it results in the need for eminent domain. The plan does not account for the expansion of infrastructure in any way, shape or form. This MUST be a part of the comprehensive plan, but it is not. We need to consider and add this. This will have a huge impact on quality of life as well. My final comment here is my concern for the ultimate lack of form-based planning. If we remove specific building height restrictions and give developers broad ability to densify areas without proper controls, we lose our ability to effectively manage development to ensure it fits in a long term comprehensive plan. By removing such specificity from the plan, we set a precedent for uncontrollable development and outcomes. Amendments and variances are granted for a reason - to maintain the ability to properly govern and control development that is in the best interest of the city, its residents and businesses. If we remove that control, we no longer have the ability as a city to adequately plan for the future and ensure outcomes can be managed effectively. Please take these issues seriously. The future of our city depends on it! The plan will be available for public review and comment during a six month period starting later this year. This initial review is just to prepare the plan for its initial release for wider review.The density ranges included in this plan are the result of small area plans that were recently completed through community-based processes and adopted by the City Council. They represent participants' vision of what is appropriate for these areas in terms of desired development.Employment is expected to grow at a slower rate than residential, based on regional forecasts, and growth patterns have been adjusted accordingly. Add reference to Economic Competitiveness chapter, which outlines approach to economic development.Height restrictions are not being removed. They will be maintained largely as is within the city's zoning code. They were removed from the Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan98 4 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design6 On p. 3-6 it says " How can the City balance the desire of some residents for larger homeswith state-of-the-art features and developers seeking to offer housing units that appeal to today’s market, with the interests of neighbors who object to the size and scale of some new construction?" There is no answer to this question later in the chapter. I suggest the city sponsor a design contest in which designers could submit plans they have developed for low-rise but modern and desirable homes for families. The focus could include up-to- date features like "visitability" (universal design that makes the house in a way that when you have a visitor with a disability, they can manage well in your home); energy-efficient design, and flexible-use spaces (e.g. so part of the home can become a "grandma" or "boomerang-kid" apartment at some point). Houses don't have to be tall to be wonderful.A complementary approach would be to have a set of straightforward plans for upgrades to 50s ramblers and other legacy homes, along with promised streamlining of permits if the plans are followed. Developers are not original thinkers, especially in nweighborhoods where they can't sell a new house for over amillion dollars. Please help out the older and less expensive neighborhoods!These recommendations can be explored in more detail in the housing study that is recommended as an implementation step for the comprehensive plan88 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design25 These pages (25-35) should be revised to reflect the lower maximum dwelling units per acre and the new Mixed Used designation adopted by the Council on April 2. Update numbers and calculations to reflect most updated density ranges100 1 Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design2 Table 3.1 shows data from MSP Thrive as of January 2019. This table shows population growing from 47,941 in 2010 to 63, ,600 in 2040 or 33% growth. When I visit the official Met Council Thrive website it shows (as of January 1, 2019) the population growing from 47,941 in 2010 to 59,600 in 2040 or 24% growth. I know the Met Council will revise their forecast based on input from the local government so I am assuming the City Council requested this upward revision in the projected population. These numbers drive the Comp Plan so it would be great to have an explanation of this change. There seems to be a general argument being made that the Comp Plan is the City's response to how it will manage its fair share of the regional growth. If in fact the City has successfully requested higher population growth than the MET Council originally projected, this should be clearly pointed out and the reasons why clearly explained. These forecasts have been revised based on mutual agreement between the City and Metropolitan Council. Additional language will be added to clarify that in this section.29 1 Chapter 4: Housing3 Use of the word "currently." Some data 3 years old. Is it current? Change to "as of this writing" or similar. Revised text as suggested30 1 Chapter 4: Housing1 "The City of Edina has taken proactive steps regarding affordability via its Housing Succession Plan and the subsequent adoption of its Affordable Housing Policy, but evaluation is needed to determine if this is sufficient."Housing Succession Plan was from 2005. Was it reviewed for relevance? Was it enacted? Remove, or if left in, add date. Add date to Affordable Housing Policy. It is now renamed. Note that it is limited in scope to inclusionary affordable housing.Revised text as suggested Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan31 4 Chapter 4: Housing12 "The city's inclusionary housing policy is a key example. of this, but will need to be supported by addressing the barriers to creating affordable housing such as zoning restrictions." p. 12Promote the preservation and production of affordable housing through the areas of Edina accessible to transit by addressing financial and zoning barriers." p. 20"Edina has worked for decades to protect and grow value, sometimes to the extent of excluding types of development or even people. Now is time to change course, to be more welcoming and inclusive by seeking to provide housing for households with a broader range of incomes." p. 11Comments: Has zoning prevented affordable housing construction? If yes, how and when? If there are zoning restrictions that prevent affordable housing development, specify them or remove. It does not help to repeat these ideas if they are not founded in fact."...sometimes to the extent of excluding certain types of development or people." If factual, specify. What types of development have been excluded in the past decade or so? What people have been excluded? There is a history of racial covenants and redlining, as there was in other communities, and there are ongoing disparities as a result. If that is what this is referring to, be specific."...by seeking to provide housing for people with a broader range of incomes." What is the income distribution now? Much of Edina's housing stock is modest, and much is occupied by people who could not afford to buy the same house today, but whose housing costs are low because they have lived in their homes for many years. Edina has an identity of an affluent community and it can be as though the many people living in modest homes, on modest incomes, are unseen.Use of the word "diversity" (multiple pages). Be specific. When not defined, does "diversity" refer to economic, racial, age, or other demographic?This topic of affordble housing will be addressed in a follow-up housing studyThe term diversity will be clarified where appropriate. If not otherwise specified, it refers to a broad range of diversity by race, income, ethnicity, origin, age, etc.32 2 Chapter 4: Housing1 'General comments about the chapter:--Most info is surface level. Wish the city would have drilled down more to identify the types of housing that fit specific needs in the community, whether housing with services, senior coop, or other.--Related, I wish the chapter would have looked at how housing stock shapes a community. For example, how the ratio of owner-occupied to rental housing is shifting as more rental units are being constructed. As a higher percentage of residents are renting, what impacts does that have (sure some research has been done on this).--I wish the chapter would have looked at property taxes and TIF. The property tax burden is primarily borne by residential property owners (non apartments). The number of new developments in TIF districts heightens this. Related, I wish the chapter would have looked at how property taxes are burdening many who live in more affordable homes--especially in areas where there have been teardown/rebuilds. Also, how special assessments can burden property owners. Those in modest properties pay a high percentage of their home's value in special assessments. Edina's reliance on the tax capacity of residential properties (non apartments) means that it has an interest in increasing values, which can work against goals for affordability. Edina's reliance on revenue from special assessments for road reconstruction means those in more modest homes are generally more burdened than those in more expensive homes. The chapter would have been both more interesting, and more useful, if it had dug into these issues.--Overall, it is too wordy. Cut as much as possible. Put as much as possible into tables, charts, maps, etc. and minimize narrative.Add examples of housing types in response to identified needsAdditional topics related to affordability will be covered in a follow-up housing study. Include cross references to Economic Competitiveness chapter. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan33 1 Chapter 4: Housing2Most of my changes are suggestions to improve accuracy or clarity. I support the overall themes of the chapter. I am especially pleased with how it incorporates affordable housing.p 4.2 The change in population from 2020 to 2040 per the bar chart is +8,600 or 15.6% not +5,800 or 24% as stated in the textp 4.5 Please define the "Twin Cities Region" as (the 7 county greater metropolitan area) in the box on Definition - affordability. Using this broad area to define AMI has significant implications. p4.6 I don't know if you can change Table 4.1 as it comes from the Metropolitan Council but it could be improved. The total should appear at the top of each subsection as it does in the first two subsections. In the the third subsection the total is at the bottom. The Housing units subsection has two further subsections that both total to the overall total. The use of bold dividing lines or an additional blank row might help the readability of this chart.P4.6 Table 1 shows a total number of affordable units at 7,525. Later in Table 4.4 there is a goal cited of 1220 affordable units. I have heard at City Council and Planning Commission meetings that our number of affordable units is more like 994. The disconnect between the 7525 number and the much smaller numbers shown later must be explained.p4.11 Please explain what is meant by the parenthetical expression (formally and informally) related to high density housing in the second to last sentencep4.12 Please explain what is meant by the term "value capture" in the sentence: In general Edina needs approaches that are focused on value capture of current and forecasted growth. This may be familiar jargon in the planning world but it is not to me.P4.12 The last sentence ends with: addressing the barriers to creating affordable housing such as zoning restrictions. Would it help to provide an example of this type of zoning restriction in parentheses?p4.13 Please provide a definition of congregate housing.p4.14 In the section on Missing Middle housing please repeat the list of examples you provided in the first section on page 4.12. This is an important concept so the repetition will help ensure people understand it.p4.15 "Live and work" - Is Centennial Lakes a model for this concept - ie housing in close proximity to office buildings and retail workplaces. If it is then list it as an example. p4-15 There is a new multifamily affordable housing policy. Should this be included in this section about the City's Affordable Housing policyp4.16 Here is an example of some language that occurs through the remainder of this chapter: "Housing for young families, including first-time homebuyers. The strength of the school district in Edina attracts families with school aged children. There will be a continued need for housing options that work for families, including affordably priced ones." The latest demographic study for the school system pointed out that the type of housing with the highest yield for students was the most expensive single family homes (+$750,000). Hazel made the point that families with kids are now often older than in earlier generations. We should be careful that this document does not perpetuate concepts that are not borne out in the latest demographic data. (young families/first home buying families are the source for kids for the school. While certainly true as a general statement, in Edina it may be that middle age move-up families are the primary source for kids in school)p4.17 Again reconcile the disconnect between chart 4.4 and chart 4.1 on p4.6p4.19 Under Goal 1, section 3. e there is the sentence : Providing lifecycle housing opportunities for community renewal. I am not sure what this means. I understand the idea of housing for each part of someone's life cycle but the link to community renewal is a little vague. Does this mean: we want to ensure that there are always sufficient housing options for each lifecycle stage so that with each new generation we can start the lifecycle journey over again?p4.19 Goal 2 Point 2 Please add the NOAH acronym at the end. (so it becomes familiar)Make changes as requested to increase clarity43 3 Chapter 4: Housing1 Include strong provisions in the plan to protect of the number of existing number affordable housing units especially as part of a redevelopment project with a clear one for one replacement policy that preserved both the number of affordable units by bedroom size.The plan includes a policy that existing affordable units be preserved. The issue will be addressed in more detail in a subsequent housing study. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan44 4 Chapter 4: Housing1Include a more liberal use of R-2 zoning and allow single family housing to convert space to efficiency and one bedroom units in existing homes, over garages or a “ casita ” (a small house next to a large home found in the US southwest and some Latin American homes) to allow homeowners to accommodate extended family or cover housing expenses. A sudden or gradual change in the economy or household preferences may not be able to support all these supersized houses that have been built recently. The plan includes a policy supporting the exploration of potential for accessory dwelling units. The issue will be addressed in more detail in a subsequent housing study.45 4 Chapter 4: Housing1 Promote limited equity cooperative housing for seniors such as 7500 York along with subsidies for lower income seniors to buy existing shares.A reference to cooperative housing models is included in the implementation section of the chapter. The issue will be addressed in more detail in a subsequent housing study.46 4 Chapter 4: Housing1 Promote of affordable rental and owner occupied townhouses for families with children such as the designed used at York Townhomes.The plan recommends affordable housing for families, among other types. The issue will be addressed in more detail in a subsequent housing study.47 4 Chapter 4: Housing1 Study the possible impact and change in housing demands due to the 2018 Federal Tax changes that impose a limit on the deduction of state and local taxes such as property taxes and the interest from mortgages that were over $750,000 Homeowners may be less inclined to take on large mortgages and properties with high real estate taxes because of these changes and shift their spending on other items.The issue will be addressed in more detail in a subsequent housing study.48 1 Chapter 4: Housing1 I would like to see a greater emphasis on the links between housing policy and climate change throughout this and the Land Use chapter. A recent NYTimes article, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opinion/california-home-prices-climate.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepagepoints out that according to recent research, higher densities not only facilitate affordable housing development, they also support public transportation that reduces greenhouse gas emissions from cars. Research showed that the impact of housing policies had a greater effect on reducing carbon emissions than the promotion of electric cars. Insisting that Edina maintain its disproportionate land use devoted to solely to low and very low density single family home neighborhoods raises land prices, reduces housing affordability, inhibits/prevents the development of public transit, and increases car traffic and greenhouse gas emissions. (And the same people who oppose higher density hate increased traffic.)Higher densities and mixed use developments are fine near existing public transit lines but we need to promote the possibility of higher densities in single family residential areas as well. (You could easily get four housing units in to a new McMansion not far from my house in the Concord neighborhood). Otherwise we'll never meet our growing need for affordable housing or build out public transit fast enough to meet the Add language to the plan regarding the role housing policy has in supporting sustainability goals, with reference to Energy & Environment chapter Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan49 1 Chapter 4: Housing27 First, there needs to be a definition of "senior housing". Do you mean different housing models for older adults, or age-segregated housing?I have led several discussions about housing options with the "baby boomer" generation (of which I am one). It appears that traditional age-segregated "senior housing" is not favored by many in this very large cohort--unless there is some need for special services with the housing.. Most I've talked to value a more natural, multigenerational "neighborhood" setting either by aging in place in their own homes, or in, for example, co-housing communities. I would strongly suggest that the City have a conversation with "seniors" before building more age-segregated senior housing. I think many boomers want out of that box!Add definition of senior housing to cover the range of housing options typically given this title. Senior housing, in various forms, has been identified repeatedly as a priority for Edina as existing residents transition from single family homes.61 6 Chapter 4: Housing1 I am oppose to the significant increase in density which probably requires undesirable height. The strength of Edina is the single family neighborhoods and surrounding them with high density is wrong. Not only does density challenge the neighborhoods, but it also challenges our infrastructure. Developers will use "public realm" and "Affordable Housing" to force Edina into decisions not in the interest of the City or residents.The emphasis of Affordable Housing is miss directed. 1. When 20% is forced into a new apartment project, the result is troublesome for 2 reasons: a. It forces market rate units in the project to a higher rental to cover the rental shortfall from the Affordable units, or b. I t requires huge public subsidy. 2. Edina should use all the available methods to develop Affordable Housing and on a permanent basis. Home ownership is far better than rentals. a. To increase Affordable Housing, Edina should assist families to purchase NOAH (SFR) homes. Programs like return to Edina are good. TIF should be used to ex[pand this type of program. b. Edina should also encourage NOAH as apartments age such as Galleria Flats. c. Edina should develop cooperative programs with Affordable Housing Experts such as AEON. These will result in building such as West 66th and the proposed West 76th projects. This type of effort will help increase our numbers rapidly.The use of TIF needs a plan and limits. Despite Mike Fischer's presentation, I still believe it takes funds from the Schools District. As noted in the StarTribune today, Governor Walsh indicated many districts in MN are facing serious problems supporting the teachers and staff. Similar problems are happening all over the nation. We need to get ahead of the problem(s).Updating our infrastructure is also a better use of TIF rather than marginal Public Realm items.The focus on affordable housing in the plan is consistent with past City Council direction and adopted policy.The programs identified in this comments are included as potential tools in the chapter's implementation section. A more specific and targeted approach may be developed in a subsequent housing study recommended as an implementation step. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan78 1 Chapter 4: Housing1 Data Is SuspectThe data is in many places suspect, particularly in the Housing section. That section uses Census tract data to calculate average home prices and incomes. This is wildly off the mark. The tract where I live, 239.03, has a “hard division” of street grid between 2 dramatically different land uses. East is large multi-family apartment buildings (and commercial) while west is large-lot single-family homes. Yet the home prices and incomes are calculated collectively, with no accounting for this dramatic difference. When I lived in an apartment, I couldn’t possibly have afforded my house – I expect the same is roughly true here. It’s misleading at best and dishonest at worst to claim that housing is too expensive because the average income of apartment-dwellers and homeowners is not enough to buy the homes. We cannot trust any calculations based on this faulty background data. The final Plan must correct this faulty data and faulty use of it.Other bad data includes population projections – The Met Council projects slow growth, up to 53,000 in 2040 (2015 System Statement) yet the Draft projects 63,000, fully 20% higher. From the same source, the Met Council projects need for 878 low- and moderate-income housing units, while the Draft projects 1,220. The Draft uses units per acre as a density measure, when in reality people per acre is a much better measure – a one-bedroom apartment creates much less density than a single-family home with 6 or more people, and that’s magnified where it is a single elderly retiree versus a big busy family, yet the Draft counts both as 1 unit. The Cost Burden tables of 4-8 are estimates made by comparing average cost of housing in an area with average income. That’s hogwash. If I have a modest home and a small income and my neighbor has an expensive mansion and a huge income, averaging both incomes and housing costs might show that both of us are “experiencing cost burden” when in fact neither of us are.Census tract data are used to provide comparable information to what is in the existing plan. Unfortunately, it is not possible to correct for arbitrary boundaries within commonly available data sets. However, citywide data show similar patterns related to affordability. The projections used here have been revised upwards from the 2015 System Statement, based on mutual agreement between the City and Metropolitan Council. While this is stated elsewhere in the plan, it will be added here as well for clarification.Units per acre are used as a baseline because of Metropolitan Council requirements. This is also reflected in city zoning. However, population forecasts are also included, as they are more relevant to identifying needs for services like schools and parks.The cost burden tables are based on HUD and Metropolitan Council analysis of Census microdata, which pairs households and incomes. It is not based just on averages in these areas. Information about how this is calculated can be added to the plan for clarification.80 4 Chapter 4: Housing1 Property Taxes Needlessly Drive Up Housing CostsI see no mention of property taxes in the Housing sections or sections about housing and land use. Property taxes are a he contributor to the cost of living in Edina. In many neighborhoods, and average home will pay around $1,000 per month in property taxes. My taxes have more than doubled in 14 years, while my assessed value has risen about 50%. I own property in other cities where the taxes have grown far, far less – most are around 50% growth, reflecting values that have grown about 50%in that span. The cost of government is far too high in Edina, and the residential tax portion of that is ridiculously high, considering the enormous property taxes Edina reaps from high-value commercial property. These ultra-high property taxes needlessly force prices up. Edina’s government must get more efficient and cost less. A failure to do so is the major controllable contributor to Edina’s high housing cost.The contributors to housing value and affordability will be covered in more detail in a follow-up housing study Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan82 4 Chapter 4: Housing1Housing DeceptionEdina is the most expensive large suburb, with 3 of the 4 wealthiest zip codes in Minnesota. Despite that, fully one-third of it’s total housing units are “affordable” to households making 80% of the median income, including 1,351 units available to the “very poor” 30% median income level (4-6). This is incredible – all of the amenities of living in Edina, including schools, parks, sports leagues, public safety, shopping choices, jobs, etc. are freely available to thousands of households making an income well below average, and are available to more than a thousand of the very poorest tier of households. The Draft itself states that “the Metropolitan Council has recognized that affordable housing is a regional issue.” Further, housing is specifically cited as an issue to keep low-paying jobs: “employers may have trouble finding all the workers they need for these [low-wage] jobs.” (4-16).Edina should not tax its residents to subsidize housing so that low-wage businesses can have a pool of workers. We read daily about Wal-Mart workers needing government benefits so that Wal-Mart can keep paying them such low wages. Edina’s residents are not paying property taxes so that businesses can pay lower wages. This is particularly true when Richfield and South Minneapolis, both within walking distance of Edina’s biggest job concentrations, have thousands more units of lower-cost housing. I all the discussion of “affordable” housing, the Draft fails to mention any negative financial impact. Yet the industry widely publicizes that affordable housing requires a subsidy of $80,000 to $140,000 per unit, and that this subsidy will continue to increase. The 1,220 units will therefore require a subsidy of, at minimum, $100,000,000, with a maximum approaching $200,000,000, over the next 10 years. Is the Metropolitan Council prepared to contribute that amount of regional funds for this regional issue? Several other funding mechanisms are mentioned, many of which either cost Edina taxpayers directly (tax abatement, City-funded infrastructure, site assembly), divert collected taxes from other Edina uses (TIF, bonds), or depress assessed values (rent controls and other property restrictions), resulting in lower tax revenues. Edina will be deprived of the higher tax revenue which would be yielded by the same building at higher market rents (because revenue stream determines building value). Because of these factors, the true cost of 1,220 income-restricted units is likely to exceed the $200,000,000 cost over the next 10 years. Where does the subsidy come from, and who replaces the money Edina diverts or never collects? The Draft provides no reckoning of this enormous cost, and in fact, so far as I can see, fails to even mention it as an issue.The Housing section undermines other land use controls, stating several times that the City is willing to impose zoning controls on market-rate housing but waive it for income-restricted housing. The sole difference between market-rate and income-restricted housing is the income of the residents. The building is the same size, produces the same traffic, and throws off the same externalities whether the residents make 80% of the AMI or 90% or 110%. Any other claim is absurd. There is simply no way the City can credibly impose zoning restrictions on market rate housing yet waive it if the exact same building is placed under income restrictions. In limited cases, this can be upheld due to the lower impact of senior housing, but this is valid only for senior housing.One of the major factors adding value to housing is accessibility to high-value jobs, such as the skilled doctors at Fairview Southdale. So it is surprising to see the emphasis on increasing Edina’s land-use devoted to housing and decreasing the amount devoted to such high-paying jobs. This is especially puzzling for areas with excellent transportation access (Pentagon Park and the south Cahill Road area have two major freeways, multiple access points, a major arterial at 77th Street, a rail line, and in addition 9 Mile Creek, a lovely natural feature). Both these areas are extremely attractive to business, and high-value jobs should be preferred there over relatively low-value, high-externality housing.I’m spending so much time on housing because this section of the Draft, if allowed to stand, poses the greatest threat to Edina. Adding 13,000+ residents in tall high-density housing with the attendant traffic and crowding, including thousands of households of low-income housing will fundamentally change Edina. It will be bigger, busier, denser, more congested, more polluted, and poorer. The Draft notably fails to provide any comparisons with any other cities or neighborhoods that look like what is proposed for Edina’s future. Does it look like east Richfield? South Minneapolis? The Draft doesn’t tell us. That unknown is scary enough. The fact that Edina homeowners might pay to subsidize it is even scarier. At a minimum, the Draft should declare that regional, state or other subsidies, and not City funds, will be used Clarify in the plan the need for public subsidy to support affordable housing, and the community goals that are met by that housing, particularly for seniors and young families. Additional detail on housing strategy and approach will be addressed in a subsequent housing study recommended as an implementation step.Clarify that new residential development in the plan is primarily in areas guided for mixed use, so that housing and commercial/office can be incorporated in the same development. Also clarify that growth forecasts show a stronger demand for growth in population/households than in new jobs for the city through 2040.85 2 Chapter 4: Housing1 ConclusionThe Draft, if followed, will fundamentally change Edina to be bigger, busier, more congested, more polluted, and poorer. Edina’s family neighborhoods of single-family homes that parents have worked hard and highly prize, will largely be overwhelmed, politically and by the externalities, of the 20% population increase, consisting largely of people who don’t necessarily want to live in Edina but for whom it just happens to be convenient and cheap. This will be particularly galling to the prosperous families who paid high taxes to subsidize the growth, while those same high taxes undercut the price of homes and drive seniors out of their lifelong family homes. I would urge a different path of preserving the predominance of high-value single-family homes, allowing the free market to produce new housing at prices set by the collective action of the market, and to increase the price of existing homes as it has in past decades, so that Edina maintains a population of people who intentionally choose to live and invest in Edina. Growth should return to historic levels, not the inflated levels of the past 5 years, continuing to 2040 and beyond. I would urge a clear and unequivocal statement that Edina’s taxpayers will not bear the burden of alleviating regional problems, and that Edina will not compromise its building and zoning standards solely to socially engineer the income levels of building residents.Clarify the role and benefits of affordable housing to the community, based on City Council direction and adopted policy.Clarify that single family neighborhoods are guided to remain largely the same, according to this comprehensive plan. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan86 1 Chapter 4: Housing11 The topic of walk-ability is mentioned. Can you tell where your data came from that Edina residents want improved walk-ability from what we currently have? Edina is mostly a community of sprawling single family neighborhoods with land. It's Edina's proximity to urban areas, while maintaining quiet residential neighborhoods with larger lots that is one of the reasons for it's high demand. Add reference to feedback from prior planning efforts, including Vision Edina and the recent bicycle/pedestrian plan.87 1 Chapter 4: Housing17 "The strength of the school district in Edina attracts families with school aged children." Your arguments for affordable housing follow this sentence. But in reality, neighborhoods are currently turning over to younger families without any affordable housing measures driving the turnover. Young families are buying homes and tearing them down or buying newly built teardowns in combinations with buying existing homes. The young families that are moving to Edina can afford the homes being sold. Elementary schools are not seeing a decline in local enrollments. Add reference to regional data regarding income levels, including feedback from residents that family members are unable to find housing here90 1 Chapter 4: Housing6 I'm very concerned about affordable housing, as a member of Edina's Affordable Housing Group under chair Hope Melton. Why doesn't NOAH include ownership rather than just rental as part of the category? Is there any way to stop teardowns in East Edina that bring about "McMansions"? I think it is important that officials focus on need heavily, and minimally on residents' preferences. Granted City Council is elected and must respond to people who voted for them, but they also have a larger responsibility to the community at large.. I think this needs to be pointed out to the "naysayers" regarding affordable housing.Add clarifications as needed that NOAH includes both rental and ownership housing.Housing afffordability will be discussed in more detail in follow-up housing study Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan94 Chapter 4: Housing1I'm not sure how you legislate or plan for equality and diversity. The plan says "Now is time to change course, to be more welcoming and inclusive by seeking to provide housing for households with a broader range of incomes." Edina is an inclusive community. Show me the statistics that show Edina has a high rate of hate crime, racial tension, and discrimination. Our minority rates are in line with Minnesota demographics percentages and when comparing the demographics of our average household incomes and home values, Edina's % of minorities in those incomes and home values exceeds averages. The solution to increase Edina's diversity can't be solved by Edina's City Council. This is a complicated social-economic issue that has to do with many factors. It seems through this plan that Edina'a solutions are more high density housing, more multi-use development, and more low income housing. None of these solutions guarantee diversity. In certain minority groups, their average household income and average home values are lower. It would take social-economic change and advancements within those groups to be more represented in Edina, a community of higher than average household incomes and higher than average home values. Edina's property values are based on desirability. Edina's proximity to Minneapolis, their highly rated schools, and their quiet wooded neighborhoods drive the housing prices. Edina's housing prices perpetuate the demand in that people move here because they know their home will appreciate and hold its value. It doesn't matter what type of housing you build in Edina, the high demand will drive it's price up. The only way to reverse that would be to enact policies that go against every reason most of us moved to Edina; or in other words, to enact policies that decrease home values and decrease school ratings.Edina residents do not want the increases in traffic and infrastructure that high density housing brings. Edina residents do not want crowded schools that high density housing brings. Edina residents do want their neighborhoods re-zoned.What about the large area of Edina residents in the Northwest corner of our city whose Children are not zoned in Edina schools? Why aren't we focusing on bringing all families who live within the city limits of Edina into our schools? In other words, why are we not focusing on the needs of our own residents instead of focusing on an ideological dream of transforming our community from the outside?Your housing plan seems like it's goal is to be more like Minneapolis. Many of the families who have moved to Edina came from Minneapolis and left there because of the schools. Why are we are looking to be more like Minneapolis when clearly many of the policies they have enacted have caused a large wage gap among residents, high density areas of poverty, areas of low property values, crime, and poor school ratings?We elect our City Council members to look out for the best interests of our residents; which are to uphold policies and ordinances that to maintain our property values, maintain our highly rated schools, maintain our streets and parks, maintain the character of our community, and allow our police and fire departments to keep us safe. It is not the City Councils job to legislate a vision of the future that does not align with the current residents' best interest. Add reference to city's stated positions on equity and diversity in adopted directives and policies. Include link to Human Rights chapter where issues are discussed in more detail.96 4 Chapter 4: Housing15 "desire to protect and enhance the neighborhood". How do we convince people that some density is not going to wreck their neighborhood??The chapter includes language on the benefits of growth and density, and indicates that the most recent levels were set through community-based planning processes.97 1 Chapter 4: Housing26 Is there any way to increase the categories of financing that would deal with 30% of AMI? There seems to be only spot wher that percentage comes up. Many of the jobs in the Greater Southdale area are service jobs that would fit into this category of income.Many of these tools are intended to cover levels of affordability up to 80% AMI, inclusive of 30%. Add language that clarifies that point. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan99 1 Chapter 4: Housing16 I would like to see more discussion of affordable home ownership for the young families mentioned on page 16. Affordable rental units, especially those at the 30%, 50% and 60% level, are greatly needed. However it is also desirable to have ownership options, and these need not all be single-family detached homes. Duplexes, triplexes and condominiums can also be part of the affordable home ownership mix.Add more discussion on these points as indicated101 1 Chapter 4: Housing10 Add to household types that need specialized housing: childless couples, single professionals, empty nesters. There is a need to a different type of housing for these groups who do not want to be in a multi-unit building. The concept of ADUs (Accessory Development Units) or "Granny Flats" who provide a smaller square footage single family home that would allow a more affordable dwelling type as it could be built on the same property as a single family home. Minneapolis has successfully implemented this housing type. They could also be rented under specific guidelines such as requiring the lessor to live in the main house on the property. This would be a great options for families who want to care for their senior parents.Add household types as indicated. The plan already includes a recommendation to consider the possibility of allowing ADUs in the future102 4 Chapter 4: Housing21 Under housing affordability add: Reduce excessive permitting and other new construction fees to improve housing affordability. Housing tools to support affordability will be covered in more detail in follow-up housing study103 4 Chapter 4: Housing15 Big ideas housing types should include:* ADUs (Accessory Dwelling Units) also called "Granny Flats" would allow small square footage single family homes on land with existing single family homes. This would provide a more affordable home to fit the lifestyles if empty nesters, single professionals, childless couples, and children of homeowners just exiting college and starting their careers.*Pocket Neighborhoods: This would be small, clustered, cottage style single family home that would be built on land adjacent to transportation nodes. This would lower land costs and make a single family home more affordable for empty nesters, single professionals, childless couples, and children of homeowners just exiting college and starting their careers.The plan already includes a recommendation to consider ADUs. Additional strategies will be covered in follow-up housing study104 4 Chapter 4: Housing15 Eliminate goals for affordable housing. Edina residents should not subsidize housing for people who can't otherwise afford Edina housing. Those people can instead live in lower cost neighborhoods, probably outside Edina, where they can afford to live without subsidy.For example, I have a close relative with limited income. He bought a home in St Paul about five years ago for $57,000. He has since made improvements that he did himself and that probably increased his total investment to $70,000. His family of three lives there and enjoys it. The cost per person is about $70,000/3 = $23,000 per person. I contrast that with 66 West which cost $10M for 39 single unit apartments. The cost per person is $256,410. This is over TEN TIMES the cost per person of my relative! IT'S NUTS! This is not social justice - this is most definitely social injustice!When I was a young man I lived in an Army barracks for a year - one room shared with 39 other guys. We each had half a bunk bed and a locker. It was fine, in fact it was luxurious compared to my subsequent housing in Vietnam. And I was a college grad. Where is the justice in requiring Edina residents to subsidize people to live in $256K single occupant housing? The same thing goes for seniors (and I'm a senior). Edina residents should not subsidize senior housing. If a senior can't afford to live in Edina without subsidy, he/she should move to a neighborhood and a home that he/she can afford (without subsidy) Affordable housing goals are set at a regional level and supported by adopted city policy. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan34 3 Chapter 5: Transportation54 Just a question, no change: What does “Not Endorsed by City Of Edina” refer to for the three areas crossed out refer to?These represent roadway segments that Hennepin County would like to "turn back" to the City of Edina. The City does not agree with the County and would prefer that the County maintains jurisdiction over these segments.35 3 Chapter 5: Transportation1 I would like the city to acknowledge the fact that access to Maple Rd from 48th and 49th St off France Avenue has created an opportunity for an increasing number of vehicles to bypass the congestion at 50th & France. These vehicles do not obey the stop signs nor the posted speed limit. We have already witnessed a vehicle rollover right in the middle of Maple Rd last summer. Excessive speed and disobeying the stop sign were contributing factors! We would like the city to reduce and enforce a 20 MPH speed limit, enforce vehicles to obey the stop signs, and possibly install some form of speed reduction.With the construction of Nolan Main, we have also observed an increase number of vehicles parked on Maple Rd, specifically at the corner of 50th and Maple. These cars are parked for 6-8 hours per day, sometimes on both sides of the street making it very difficult to turn left onto Maple especially during rush hour. Turning left from Maple to 50th is almost impossible during rush hour causing significant back up on Maple Rd.I am not against the development at 50th and France, I just want the city to acknowledge and address these issues.Concerns in this comment address localized traffic issues. The Comp Plan's focus is on regional issues. The 50th & France Small Area Plan is the appropriate document for addressing local traffic issues and that document does recognize that there are local traffic issues that can result from implementation of new development and includes a policy to address these types of impacts. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan50 1 Chapter 5: Transportation196I can supply a Word document with changes marked, if requested. Summary of changes: 1. DOT's system is known as "intercity", so the parentheses should be reversed. 2. The sentence at the end of the first paragraph clarifies the intercity rail concept. 3. At the start of the third paragraph, "commuter" was changed to "light". The interest of residents was in exploring light rail concepts, not heavy, hazardous commuter rail. 4. The recommendation was that the City not continue the study, so so "not to" was changed to "that the City not". 5. The paragraph added at the end recognizes other's efforts that may have a significant effect on transportation planning in Edina. The changed text: Passenger RailMnDOT’s 2015 update to the Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Rail Plan guides the future of both freight and intercity (passenger) rail systems and rail services in the state. While there is no specific mention of Edina, the plan generally provides strong support for increased investment in passenger rail as a response to growing congestion on highways serving the metropolitan area and exurban communities. The Rail Plan identifies a passenger rail line that extends from the Twin Cities to Northfield that would pass through the City of Edina by way of the Canadian Pacific Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway (CP MN&S) subdivision. This corridor is also known as the Dan Patch Corridor and is identified as a Phase 1 project in the plan. This identification indicates it is a desirable project within a 0- to 20-year (2015 - 2035) implementation horizon. Intercity rail is a concept for express service between Minneapolis and Northfield with fast, heavy trains moving through Edina and other communities with no stops along the way. A study conducted in 2002 examined the feasibility of establishing commuter rail service along the Dan Patch corridor. At that time, responding to opposition from residents, former State Representative Ron Erhardt introduced legislation that would prohibit state and regional agencies from spending any money to study, plan or design a commuter rail line in this corridor. This legislation, which was passed and has been referred to as the "gag order," applies to state agencies and affected Regional Railroad Authorities but not cities.Based on interest in light rail expressed by Edina residents, the City in 2017 conducted a study to gauge public support for passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor through Edina. The majority of public feedback was not supportive of passenger rail in the corridor; particularly noted are comments coming from residents who live along the route. The study, which is documented in the Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report, concluded with a recommendation that the City not pursue passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor at that time. The City may benefit from interest in light rail by other communities, particularly Savage, which sees a light rail crossing of the Minnesota River and connection to Southwest Light Rail as a means to relieve congestion on the US Highway 169 bridge. Light rail concepts being considered are less noisy and safer than heavy alternatives such as intercity and commuter rail, can be implemented quickly, and will cost a small fraction of recent Twin Cities light rail projects. If implemented, a light rail system between Saint Louis Park and Savage along the Dan Patch corridor (with two or three stops in Edina) will have a profound effect on transportation, will The information provided in the Comprehensive Plan is technically accurate. These comments address stylistic preferences. This section will be reviewed and, where appropriate, changes in style will be made.51 1 and 4 Chapter 5: Transportation1 To encourage the use of MTC's express bus service by promoting access during the week to underused parking lots located near bus stops and owned by public and private owners. Perhaps incentives could be made to reward owners who offer some of their underused parking spaces for this purpose.Language will be added to the Goals, Policies, and Implementation sections to address this concern. Additionally, the concern will be directed to the ETC for consideration outside the Comp Plan. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan52 4 Chapter 5: Transportation1 Modify Edina's on street parking ordinances to allow commuters to park their cars on public streets for up to 12 hours located within two hundred yard of bus stops especially on express bus stops. Because express buses are not within walking distance for most residents, these two changes in parking options, would encourage the use of express bus services serving primarily downtown Minneapolis and could reduce the heavier use of private vehicles in and around Edina. This concern will be directed to the ETC for consideration outside the Comp Plan.89 3 Chapter 5: Transportation48 The section on page 48 regarding 50th and France should reflect the SAP decision to require a traffic study one year after the completion of Nolan Mains. This section should further note the need to be sensitive to the impact of cut-through traffic on adjacent neighborhoods. The sections on France Avenue should also note that the 44th and France working group discussed the need for additional pedestrian safety at 44th and France. Concerns in this comment address localized traffic issues. The Comp Plan's focus is on regional issues. The 50th & France Small Area Plan is the appropriate document for addressing local traffic issues and that document does recognize that there are local traffic issues that can result from implementation of new development and includes a policy to address these types of impacts.36 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources6 Reference to Fred Richards Golf Course -- it is no longer a golf course.A correction will be made to the Comp Plan that goes to adjacent cities for review and the Met Council.37 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources8 Weber Woods is not included in Open Space table. Is it included with Weber Park acreage or is it not considered park land? It is in the current CIP to be a dog park.A correction will be made to the Comp Plan that goes to adjacent cities for review and the Met Council.38 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources9 Policy 1-C -- will the city also consider purchasing land for park use and/or converting publicly owned land from existing use to park use? If yes, add it. If no, why not?Yes. Policy 1-C should have opened with the following line: “It is the intent of the City to maintain and, when feasible, increase its current park and open space property.” Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan39 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources10 Policy 3-A -- what about the parks strategic plan, community center study, parks/recreation data from community surveys, etc. Not clear why only Vision Edina (2015) and Big Ideas Workshop (2017/2018) are referenced as providing guidance when other valuable guidance is found in these other documents.Indeed. Many sources were considered in the development of this plan, and many will help guide recommendations in the future. While Park Master Plans and Small Area Plans are called out in other policy aspects of this goal, it is a miss NOT to also include the Edina P&R Strategic Plan as a core guiding document to future recommendations. This would be a good addition to Policy 3-A in the Parks section.40 3 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources1 General statement -- the goals are vague and, as a result, not that useful. Perhaps some can be combined, made more specific.We will continue to refine goal statements to add specificity. Combining goals does not seem to make sense as that would tend to further dilute intent.41 3 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources2 Questions:1) How did we come to 15% as the commitment number for parks and green space? Why isn't it higher or lower?2) Does the mention of hardscape mean that future hardscape spaces will count towards parks and open space areas – even if they aren't naturally occurring spaces?I'm commenting specifically on this snippet:"Edina has committed to a minimum of 15 percent of its land area to be used as parks and green space. (As of the most recent census, we are right at this threshold.) Future standards will need consider “hardscape” environments as represented in the Greater Southdale District Plan."To the best recollection of staff, the 15% target was based off of insight from the NRPA (National Recreation and Park Association). Yes – future hardscape spaces would also likely be included in this metric as they would be serving a particular role as a park.63 3 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources1 Shouldn't there be more information on what will happen with Fred Richards Park included? Like a timetable of completion, cost, parking, etc? There is a separate Master Plan, approved by City Council, that addresses the improvements at Fred Richards. Details regarding that plan are available through the city. It is not the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to include all broad strategic or specific park master plans. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan64 3 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources1 The Major Challenge text box: Edina's population has increased 14.6% this decade (2010-2020). It is expected to increase at a lower rate over the next two decades (about 9% over 20 years). We are in the challenging growth period now. The challenge is that we are not yet seeing the full impacts of this growth. Looking forward is good, but there is also a need to seek to understand how this growth is affecting Edina now.A good point. Addressing “Edina now” comes from the direction of City Council and the priorities of our last strategic plan. Setting some guidance for “Edina future” is the intent of this Comp Plan.65 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources2 The 2016 population number used is outdated at this point. The 2020 (next year) estimate is 55,000. This works out to about 28.5 acres per 1,000.By 2030, it will be about 26 acres per 1,000 and by 2040 just under 25 acres per person. Yet, there is no policy in this chapter to purchase land for park and open space use when good options become available. Good catch. A line was dropped from the initial draft that should be added back as the opening line of Policy 1-C: “It is the intent of the City to maintain and, when feasible, increase its current park and open space property.”66 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources9 Policy 1-C addresses potential of selling parks/open space property. It should also address possibility of purchasing property for parks/open space used and also converting non-park public property (such as parcels the city currently owns) to park/open space use. Policy 1-C should have opened with the following line: “It is the intent of the City to maintain and, when feasible, increase its current park and open space property.”67 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources10 Policy 3-A. What about recommendations in the parks strategic plan, community center study, quality of life surveys, etc. Why only Vision Edina and the Big Ideas workshop. The exclusion of other parks/recreation processes that happened in recent years seems strange. Indeed. Many sources were considered in the development of this plan, and many will help guide recommendations in the future. While Park Master Plans and Small Area Plans are called out in other policy aspects of this goal, it is a miss NOT to also include the Edina P&R Strategic Plan as a core guiding document to future recommendations. This would be a good addition to Policy 3-A in the Parks section Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan68 4 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources10 Policy 3-CIs the EPRD and PARC going to be taking an active role in development review? If yes (or no) what does it mean to "support the successful development and execution of" small area plans? What if the plans conflict with increasing parks/recreation facilities? The Small Area Planning process has been driven by the Edina Planning Commission. It has been a community focused effort to provide a thoughtful approach to what fits best for the future structure and utilization of these designated areas. Both ERPD and PARC members have been engaged in those development processes. Going forward, these plans will become another input in the future direction of Edina’s parks and programs.69 1 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources10 Policy 1-CWhat does it mean to reduce wild life migration away from their natural habitat?Someone's backyard can be the natural habitat for a coyote, rabbit, raccoon, deer or other urban wildlife. Not sure what this means.This item under the Natural Resources section could be stated more clearly. The intent behind this policy is the following: “Wildlife will be nurtured and protected. Animal and bird populations that are considered a threat to public health or safety, or may be considered hazardous to the environment or infrastructure within Edina, will be proactively managed.” We will review for a better statement of the intent.70 3 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources11 Policy 1-G"The structure, content, and oversight of these plans will be at the sole direction of the City Council in coordination with the Edina city manager." What is the intent of this statement and is it necessary? Is it saying the PARC has no role?The PARC is an advisory body. The City Manager is the operational lead. The City Council is the decision making authority. The PARC believes that part of its role as an advisory council is to also ensure an adequate amount of transparency to monitor the successful use of assets in our parks and programs. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan92 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources62 and soon mountain bike trails. Can the city elaborate on this. I've seen the plans but have not seen any updates on actual trail building. With the Edina HS having a mountain bike team it would seem very beneficial to have a trail system so close. Also, cyclists will come from other cities to ride & spend money. Look at Lebanon Hills Eagan & Theodore Wirth in Golden Valley. These trails bring in riders from miles around. Edina has the terrain and space to make and excpetional trail. 83 4 Chapter 6: Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources1 Develop Parks, Eliminate BuckthornFred Richards Golf Course closed 5 years ago. Aside from the Regional Trail, nothing has happened there. Braemar has been closed for 3 years and buckthorn continues to take over, moving northward from the Hyland Park are where it has completely taken over the formerly-beautiful woods. Park areas that people do not use decline, and in this area that means buckthorn takes over or worse. Buckthorn should be totally eradicated from Braemar by 2020 – this can be done with volunteer labor, using simple hand tools and painting the stumps with herbicide. This should be done immediately. The easiest way to enlist volunteer labor is to design, and promise to construct, a trail system. Separate trails can be laid out for ski, snowshoe, mountain bike, and hiking/running. This trail network should wrap around at least the south and west sides, with extension across Braemar Drive to the ballfields, creek and north of the golf course if possible. This area is a gem from the standpoint of terrain, accessibility, and existing oak stock. This issue will be refered to the Parks and Recreation Commission.42 4 Chapter 7: Water Resources1 Since we don't have the geography or topography to create a new spring to rival the amazing Frederick Miller Spring in Eden Prairie, how about public access to groundwater via wells or pumps? There are many of us in Edina who prefer spring water to tap water for the taste, environmental impact, or personal health impact.To channel Daniel Vitalis for a moment, there's a HUGE difference between whole, natural water and processed water. We've gotten really good at distinguishing between whole or unprocessed foods, but not thinking about water in the same way. And people may think, "Well, does that matter? Isn't it just the same?" No, it's not the same.Municipal water has chlorine (an antibiotic and disruptor to the gut microbiome), fluoride (a neurotoxin, see: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/pubhealth/hat/selected/fluoride/neuro- index.html), potential acids or alkaloids to treat the pH of the water to maintain the pipe infrastructure, and other things that can't be completely filtered out like pharmaceutical drugs. If Edina is being visionary, they will have a plan to provide drinking water that doesn't come from a water treatment facility and doesn't require residents to drive to Eden Prairie to get the water we've evolved to flourish with.Refer to Public Works staff and Energy & Environment Commission for consideration53 Chapter 8: Energy and Environment8.2 P. 8-1: I would like to see this as the first "chapter highlight" as it is the most important: "The City will make sustainability a foundational element of its decision-making process. The decision-making process should also take into account the goal of an equitable distribution of benefits."P. 8-2: The greenhouse gas reduction goals are incorrect on p. 8-2. It's 30% by 2025.The order of the chapter highlights was chosen specifically by the Energy & Environment CommissionGreenhouse gas reduction goals will be review and corrected/clarified as needed Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan71 4 Chapter 8: Energy and Environment10 The first change that I would suggest to improve this chapter is to set a deadline for the completion of the "integrated environmental action plan," since I believe that this could be the basis of all future environmental actions and lay out the strategy with which different aspects (waste, climate change, etc.) would be addressed. Seeing as we haven't been able to meet the goals we've set in the past and since there are environmental issues that have to be addressed with urgency such as climate change, I believe that it is important to have an action plan created as soon as possible. Additionally, a detailed and inclusive plan can help us structure and lay out the way in which we can make the necessary changes in the most efficient, beneficial and cost-effective way possible. Another change I would suggest would be to lower the time-frame given to make the transition to renewable energy. The IPCC report, which is referenced in the chapter, explains that we need to reach net-zero green house gas emissions globally by mid-century if we want to limit the global temperature; therefore, the current goal of "80% emission reduction by 2050" is not proportional to the scale of the actions that we have to be taking. For this reason I believe that our goals should be bolder and that we should create a plan to reach net-zero green house gas emissions by 2050 or earlier. This is being tackled outside of the Comp Plan It is on the EEC's Work Plan to make a recommendation to Council this year on deadline and framework to discuss future goals91 4 Chapter 8: Energy and Environment13 In both the energy and environment section and the natural resources section, there should be a discussion of the impact of emerald ash borer on the city's tree canopy. Other cities have incurred substantial unanticipated costs in treatment, removal, and replacement of ash trees. Edina should direct the city forester to plan for the expected loss of trees and to explore treatment options where appropriate. There are bills currently moving in the state legislature that will provide grants to cities for this work. In addition, there are now treatments that are effective for preserving some trees and avoiding the wholesale loss of large numbers of trees at the same time. Currently, Chapter 8 states an action of: Trees – Tree canopy has many stacked benefits (carbon sequestering, reduction in heat island effect, storm water mitigation, supporting wildlife, etc.). Review policy and actions that support tree canopy and benefits.We could focus on Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) but that narrows the scope as we don't know what the next disease will be. Currently, Forester has a strategy to manage EAB in the tree canopy in parks and right of way including diversification of tree replacements. Connect with Forester and Parks Commission if detailed action needs to go the Comp Plan or if this is a communication of current actions or a deep dive for next year's work plan. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan59 4 Chapter 10: Economic Competitiveness and Economic Development2There should be an outline of how staff works and will work with existing business to stay, grow, and prosper. The recent loss of major employers is not a good sign about the ability of Edina to be destination for employers. This concern is already identified in Goal #3 on page 10-15. Full details of a retention/attraction strategy will be developed later (after the Comprehensive Plan is completed and approved).62 3 Chapter 10: Economic Competitiveness and Economic Development3 If Edina is giving 40% of commercial/industrial tax base to other cities as stated shouldn't the City of Edina get some type of credit for affordable housing other cities are creating with those dollars? Could this percentage be decreased to offset the TIF used for new affordable housing? Not sure how the policy is written but with Edina offsetting other Cities budgets from a policy setup 40 years ago it should be updated to meet modern financial times/needs. The 40 percent referred to by the commentor is derved through the Fiscal Disparities Program, which was established in 1971 by the Minnesota State Legislature (Minnesota Fiscal Disparities Act of 1971). Rules for the program do not include "credit" for affordable housing.76 1 Chapter 11: Human Rights and Relations1 In the sentence on page 1 below the bullet points, the phrase "One of the aims of this chapter is to ensure that steps are taken to ensure that the City looks at its departments ..." has a redundancy. It should read, "One of the aims of this chapter is to ensure that the City looks at its departments..."The green box contains the "themes" for the chapter, which belong under the section heading, "Trends, Challenges, and Themes."On page 5, the word "increasing" in the third line of the green box should not be capitalized.The percent of population that is white in 2016 in Table 11.1 is 86.5%. On the top of page 4, it says that 85 % of residents are European American - is this a current statistic, i.e., 85% as of 2018 or 2019 (rather than 2016, when 86.5% are white).The last paragraph on page 6 was identified as a "Theme," along with the items in the green box on page 1 . The subheading "theme" has been eliminated so it appears that the last paragraph on page 6 is a "challenge." The text for the "themes" that are contained in the green box on page 1, should be [repeated] on page 6 under a subheading "themes."The suggested language will b incorporated in the version of the Comp Plan that is reviewed by adjacent municipalities, agencies, and the Metropolitan Council. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan84 4 Chapter 11: Human Rights and Relations1Don’t Be RacistAs I have noted to many of you previously, the Race and Equity Task Force Report lacks essential veracity, because none of the reported incidents were ever confirmed - only 1 was investigated, and it was proven to be without merit (presaging Jussie Smollett). Edina’s laws and policies are all 100% non-discriminatory (obviously if I am wrong on that, any discriminatory laws/policies should be changed immediately). As the Draft notes, restrictive covenants have been illegal to enforce for 71 years. Edina’s population of racial minorities doubled from 2000-2016. In particular (as I have noted to City officials) a strong Indian community has taken root in southeast Edina, including a prominent Hindu Temple (just down the street from an African Christian church) and a tremendous racial mix at Centennial Lakes and on the 9 Mile Creek Trail. The Draft notes that 24% of Edina Public Schools students are minorities.Despite the obvious mixing that is occurring without social engineering, and even after acknowledging that Edina offers equality, the Draft endorses the politically-correct term “equity”. It defines “equity” as “everyone gets the supports they need.” (11-3). This leaves unanswered the obvious question: Need for what? The desired outcome is never specified. Without stating the desired outcome, we can’t possibly know what “supports” “everyone” should get. This is crucial because the Draft states Goals and Policies based on “equity”: “evaluate progress toward race equity goals” “focus on eliminating policies that create and maintain inequities based on race”. The Draft subjects the City to these undefined, subjective terms, opening the City to legal liability should it ever fail to do anything that someone says is needed for “equity.”In particular, the City will be asked to exercise favoritism by race, in hiring, housing, and other areas. Once the City commits to “equity” it will be argued that it is violating its own policy by refusing to take any “equitable” step. The City will face this challenge forever, or until there is “equity” (these are the same thing.) I would urge you not to go down this road. Instead, make your judgments based on the content of a person’s character, not the color of their skin. All the evidence supports conclusion that making race a central focus of policy debates, and adopting the subjective term “equity” as your lodestar, increases rather than decreases racial discord. You will be trading a temporary peace from race activists (which you’ll lose as soon as you deny anything they demand, however outrageous) in exchange for creating a two-tiered city, in which some Edinans are more equal (favored by official city “race equity” policy) than others. This is especially true when the 2016-2017 process to produce the Race and Equity Report was so fatally flawed by unproven and proven-false information.Comments wil be referred to Human Rights and Relations Commission. All comments will be forwarded on to the City Council.105 4 Chapter 11: Human Rights and Relations7 Eliminate Goal #4. The term "economic equity and justice for all" is ambiguous and our residents will have wildly differing opinions on what this means and how it should be addressed. My opinion is that free market forces are the best (albeit imperfect) way to make it happen. Those who contribute more should, and generally will, receive more and those who contribute less should, and generally will, receive less. Other residents will hold different opinions. But it should not be the business of our city to circumvent market forces or to transfer wealth from one resident to another.Goal 1 Policy 5 - I also find this ambiguous. I agree if the "inequities" refer to inequities in behavior toward different racial groups. I disagree if this implies the city should give preferential treatment to any racial group, even if that group is considered disadvantaged in some manner.Comments wil be referred to Human Rights and Relations Commission. All comments will be forwarded on to the City Council. Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan75 1 Chapter 15: Implementation31 The last box under "Strategy/Action Steps" Human Rights and Relations Goal 1, which begins, "Task the Human Rights and Relations Commission to develop and implement educational and other related projects..." is the implementation step for Human Rights and Relations Goal 2. This is the only implementation step for Goal 2.The "Strategy /Action Steps" listed for Goal 2, is one of the implementation steps for Goal 3 (the correct implementation step for Goal 2 is currently listed under Goal 1, as previously described). The second "Strategy/Action Step" that is listed for Goal 3, which begins, "Through the normal course of review and modification, departments will evaluate..." is one of the implementation steps for Goal 4.The last "Strategy/Action Step" that is listed for Goal 4, which begins, "Work in strong collaboration with the Edina City Council and Mayor to establish an effective working model for including the perspectives of arts and culture..." is NOT an implementation step for any Human Rights and Relations Goal; this implementation step is for an Arts and Culture goal.There is no Human Rights and Relations Goal 5 nor Goal 6 - these both describe Arts and Culture Goals.Also, there is a typo on page 15-37 in the last box under "Strategy /Action Steps: there needs to be a space between "arts" "and".The suggested language will b incorporated in the version of the Comp Plan that is reviewed by adjacent municipalities, agencies, and the Metropolitan Council.54 2-Jan SAP: 50th & France37 Issue: CLARITY OF STUDY AREA BOUNDARIESBecause the commercial node directly abuts the single family neighborhood to the north and east, it is essential to provide an absolutely clear explanation and understanding of the study area BOUNDARIES. We have received many communications from adjacent residents concerned about subterfuge. In order to avoid further misunderstanding, enlarge the map (an excellent graphic) from page vii of the Executive Summary to use here to explain the study area, or else overlay the Study Area boundary on top of an actual Hennepin County Property Interactive Map aerial photo. The scale used in Figure 1 is far too small to be readable. Then include a clearly WRITTEN description of the Study Area as suggested below:The study area is limited to only the public street rights-of-way and several commercial, multi-family or mixed use parcels in the immediate vicinity of the intersection of West 50th Street and France Avenue South. The NORTHERN boundary is defined by 3901 W. 49th St., exclusive of all single family residences on 49th St. W., and inclusive of all commercial, multifamily and mixed use properties on 49-1/2 St. W. (Market St.) The EASTERN boundary is defined by all commercial, mixed use, and multifamily properties to the east side of France Ave. S. The SOUTHERN boundary is defined by all commercial, multifamily, and mixed use properties to the north of 51st St. W. and including 4075 W. 51st St., 5000 Halifax Ave., and 4121 50th St. W. The WESTERN boundary is defined by all commercial, multifamily and mixed use properties to the east of the property line formed by First Building Corporation parcels, excluding the easement buffer strip.The study area's boundaries have been discussed by the the 50th and France Work Group and the Planning Commission, and decisions have already been made to leave the easement buffer strip in the study area. Revised language has already been included on page 37. "The existing 50-foot wide easement/buffer strip of land on the west side of the First Bank site within the study area is subject to an easement benefiting adjacent homeowners, pursuant to a 1972 deed executed by the then-Village of Edina. This easement restricts public use of this land, including a prohibition against use as a public park, except for public utility easements, if any, existing as of the date of the deed. Although this land is within the study area, the restriction against its development is noted. For public clarity, this easement is identified in green in drawings included with this small area plan as a buffer area between the neighborhood to the west and developable private property within the study area." Comment # PC Direction Chapter Page # What change would you suggest to improve this chapter?Suggested Response5. No Change - Comp Plan doesn't address this level of detail/follow up study planned after Comp Plan6. This question was already answered/this is a statement1. Change - Consultant change in version to Met Council2. Potential Change - Discussion by Planning Commission to consider change3. No Change - Provide reason why4. No Change - Refer to Commission/Staff to consider outside of Comp Plan55 1 SAP: 50th & France32 Issue: COLORS IN LEGEND ARE OFFThe legend shows BEIGE as "low density residential" and YELLOW as "Low Density Attached Residential. These colors do not correspond to the map. The map appears to be various shades of green.This map and the associated legend will be reviewed and corrected.93 1 SAP: 50th & France34Pages 34-35 of the SAP should be re-drafted to include the Council's recommendations on April 2 to lower the maximum density and revise the language about when the city should allow heights of over 4 stories.The Council's recommendation has already been included.56 5 SAP: 70th & Cahill24 Estimate the direct and indirect cost to existing property tax payers with the objective of minimizing tax burdens. I cant believe you left this out. It shows how far out of alignment our interests are.This is beyond the scope of a small area plan.57 4 SAP: 70th & Cahill12While talking about the creating new green space and amenities for new development, why not put solid plan to refurbish the Luwis park nearby by upgrading the more than 20 years old playground? Lewis Park was not included within the 70th and Cahill small area plan boundaries. This comment will be referred to the Parks and Recreation Commission. 58 3 SAP: 70th & Cahill44 Without convincing school capacity impact and school bus data and modeling, the residential density proposal would not make the whole picture here. In another view, this place is already in heart of a low density neighborhood, it will be very incoherent to bring in a big chuck high density building with possible traffic nightmare. It is indeed A "Small Area" as the SAP title says.According to a professional demographer who has studied population and school enrollment in Edina, 88 percent of Edina Public Schools students live in single-family houses. The higher the market value of the house, the more likely it is to have school-age children. For example, houses valued at $750,000 or more yield about 0.7 students per house. Those valued at less than $300,000 yield just 0.23 students. The CITY of EDINA 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update City Council Public Hearing May 7, 2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing April 24, 2019 Presentation Overview 2 •Metropolitan Council Regional Planning •Edina Comprehensive Plan Update Process •Big Ideas Workshop •Small Area Plans •Update Comprehensive Plan •Population Forecasts •Land Use Guide Changes •Public Meetings/Public Input •Better Together •Comprehensive Plan Schedule •Thank You Comprehensive Plan Update Process 3 Vision Edina 2015 Foundation Big Ideas Workshop 2017 Bridge Small Area & District Planning 2016-2019 Working Groups Comprehensive Plan Update 2019 Commissions, Staff & Agencies Planning Commission What is Edina’s Comprehensive Plan? 4 The Edina Comprehensive Plan is designed as a framework for guiding future development, redevelopment, and community enhancement. How will it be used? •To shape Edina’s collective future growth. •To protect what Edina values. •To create an even more attractive and sustainable Edina. Step 1: Big Ideas Workshop 5 Big Ideas Public Meeting Workshop April 19 and April 22, 2017 What did we do? •Bridged Vision Edina and Comprehensive Plan •Discussed current relevance •Discovered new ideas Step 2: Small Area Plans 6 The City of Edina is fully developed. The Small Area Plans were identified as potential areas of change, growth and investment. What did we do? •Planning Commission established Small Area Plan working groups •Focus Areas: o Community livability, connectivity, walkability o Density of development o Traffic Flow o Height o Respect adjacent neighborhoods o Transit Use o Bicycle Use o Linkages & Connections *All Small Area Plans have been approved by the City Council and will be included in the Comprehensive Plan Small Area Plan Goals: •Preserve the integrity of single-family and low-density neighborhoods; •Utilize existing infrastructure capacity; •Encourage efficiency in new infrastructure investments in streets, sidewalks, transit lines, water and sewer lines, stormwater management, and parks. Step 3: Update Comprehensive Plan 7 All comprehensive plans have to meet Met Council requirements. The following chapters are required: In addition to Met Council requirements, Edina has identified six additional priorities. What did we do? •Commissions and City Departments reviewed, updated and developed chapter content •30-day Comment Period •Planning Commission will make recommendation to City Council o Land Use o Housing o Water Resources o Transportation o Parks & Trails o Implementation o Economic Competitiveness o Resilience o Arts & Culture o Heritage Preservation o Energy & Environment o Health o Human Rights o Community Services & Facilities Met Council Regional Planning 8 Met Council Region Map 9 What are Forecasts? 10 •Population Forecasts are long range projections of expected growth largely based on regional macroeconomic, demographic and market assumptions. •Met Council Forecasts are not goals or targets -forecasts are intended to be realistic estimates used to guide investments in infrastructure and public services –there are no incentives or penalties. •Forecasts are provided by the Metropolitan Council and provide a shared foundation for planning by the Met Council and local governments •Metropolitan Council periodically adjusts forecasts based on new data, to ensure they are as accurate as possible. This has occurred recently with Edina and several other cities. Why Use These Forecasts? 11 •It’s to the City’s advantage to have realistic forecasts, including any needed upward adjustments. •The Metropolitan Council has a broader perspective on growth trends in the region that can inform local understanding. Why accommodate Growth? •Funding public services. •Keeping residents here. •Supporting workplace innovation. •Enabling multimodal transportation options. •Advancing regional sustainability. Met Council Forecasts for Edina 12 •Approximately 7% of Edina’s total land area is forecast for population increase •44 Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) •8 TAZs (18 %) are forecast for increased population between now and 2040 •36 TAZs (82 %) are forecast to remain the same or decrease in population Table 3.5: Guided Land Use Acres Category Current Density Units Per Acre 2018 Plan Acres % of Total Acres Low Density Residential 1-5 1-5 4,613 45.1% Low Density Attached Residential 4-8 4-8 126 1.2% Medium Density Residential 5-20 5-20 225 2.2% High Density Residential 12-30 20-60 179 1.7% Greater Southdale District Residential 12-30 50-100 68 0.7% Office Residential 12-30 20-75 315 3.1% Office 69 0.7% Neighborhood Node – 70th & Cahill Neighborhood Node – Vllyvw/Wddale Neighborhood Node – 44th & France 10-50 Up to 30 units 12 and up 10-50 Up to 30 units 12 and up 26 0.3% Mixed-use Center – Grandview Mixed-use Center – 50th and France 20-100 20-100 20-100 12-75* 69 0.7% Community Activity Center Mixed use Center - Southdale 12-105 12-150 90-150 12-150 135 93 228 1.29% .9% 2.2% Industrial 279 2.7% Open Space and Parks 1,312 12.8% Public/Semi Public 561 5.5% Regional Medical 12-80 50-100 45 0.4% Right-of-Way 2,111 20.6% Total 10,224 100.0% Land Use Guide Changes 13 •Units per acre were all approved as part of each Small Area Plan. •7% of Edina has been guided for increased density •93% of Edina will remain guided for no change in density or will experience a decrease. •Suggested ranges do not mean that is the density for a site.Number of units allowed on sites is a decision of the City Council in a Rezoning application. *Decrease 7% of the land Area in Edina is proposed for a density increase. These areas are entirely within the Greater Southdale Area. Public Meetings 14 •City Council/Planning Commission work sessions •Comprehensive Plan Task Force work sessions •Edina Boards and Commissions meetings •Big Ideas workshops •Southdale District Plan Work Group meetings •Southdale District Plan Open Houses •Small Area Plan Work Group meetings •Small Area Plan Community Meetings •Planning Commission Public Hearings •City Council Public Hearings 178 public meetings between February 2017 and April 2019 Comprehensive Plan Review Public Input 15 HOW TO PARTICIPATE: BY THE NUMBERS: •Visits (1,500) •Most visitors in one day (185) •FAQ (27) •Q&A (7/9) •Comment Form (27/105) •Documents (21/78/106) DATES: March 7 to April 8 16 Better Together Edina Visitors •1,049 AWARE Visitors •253 INFORMED Visitors •31 ENGAGED Visitors 17 Better Together Traffic Channels What did we accomplish? 18 •Awareness •Engagement Foundation •Registrations •Communication •Information Review, Analyze & Categorize Comments 19 Categories include: Next Steps for Comments: •50 of the 95 comments resulted in changes/improvements to the draft plan •Amendments for the Planning Commissions consideration •Full report available on BetterTogetherEdina.org Change 1. Change made in version for Met Council Potential Change 2. Planning Commission consider/potential change No Change 3. Provide reason why 4. Refer to Commission/Staff to consider 5. Plan doesn’t address this level of detail/potential follow up study 6. The question was already answered/this is a statement Approval Schedule 20 Thank You! 21 •Edina Residents •Edina Businesses •Edina Commissions •Small Area Plan Working Groups •City Council •Edina Staff Edina Population and Households 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 28501 I 723 I 44046 3005 46073 46070 7961 9860 111 47425 47941 0996 0672 51804 2309 63600 60000 55000 7700 9800 4000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 • Population • Households Source: US Census and Metropolitan Council EDINA'S COMPUTATIONS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING ARE NOT RELEVANT EDINA SHOULD USE ITEM USES HENNEPIN CTY IRS ACTUAL MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME $ 91K/YEAR $125K/+YEAR 'WORKFORCE' FACTOR 60% $ 54.6K/YEAR $ 75K/+YEAR 30% 'AFFORDABLE' MAX RENT $ 16,389/YEAR $ 22,500/YEAR MONTHLY RENT $ 1,366/MONTH $ 1,875/MONTH A 22-YEAR OLD TEACHER WITH A BATCHELOR'S DEGREE IN EDUCATION STARTS OUT IN THE EDINA SCHOOL SYSTEM AT ABOUT $46K/YEAR. A NEW HIRE POLICE OR FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE IN THE CITY OF EDINA STARTS OUT AT ABOUT $55K/YEAR. BUT THE HENNEPIN COUNT lf NUMBERS ARE FOR 'HOUSEHOLDS' WHERE THERE ARE NORMALLY WORKING ADUILYS. TWO NEW TEACHERS (ROOMMATES) HAVE A HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF $97K TWO NEW FIRE OR POLICE (ROOMMATES) HAVE A HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF / $110K EDINA IS NEEDLESSLY STRANGLING ARCHITECTS AND DEVELOPERS IN THEIR BOXER SHORTS TO ADD "X" % OF AFFORDABLE UNITS TO EACH NEW APARTMENT BUILDING WHEN, IN FACT THEIR MARKET RATE RENTS ARE ALREADY BELOW THE COMPUTED AFFORDABLE RATES. cgF YOU WOU_D ONLY USE THE CORRECT NUMBERS. ALL OF THE CITY COUNCIL'S FOUR,HOUR MEETINGS AND FIVE DIFFERENT AGONIZING REDESIGNS OF PROPOSED HOUSING ARE FOR NAUGHT. MY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL MATH TEACHER EXPLAINED TO ME THAT YOU CAN DIVIDE ANY NUMBER BY ANY OTHER, AS LONG AS THE DIVISOR ISN'T ZERO. THAT'S STILL TRUE TODAY, 60 YEARS LATER. IF NEW, YOUNG WORKFORCE EMPLOYEES INSIST ON LIVING ALONE, (ONE PERSON PER APARTMENT), LET THEM LIVE IN HOPKINS OR RICHFIELD OR 'UNPRESTIGIOUS EAST BLOOMINGTON AND COMMUTE TEN MINUTES TO WORK IN EDINA. POOR BABIES !! CREDIT OPINION 29 May 2018 Edina (City of) MN Update to credit analysis Edina (City of) MN 2012 Total Full Value ($000) $9,360,281 Population 48,155 Full Value Per Capita $194,378 CNG 2t 6,4 + for + /6 % 2013 2014 2015 2016 $9,322,091 $9,922,330 $10,890,198 $11,272,241 48,574 48,940 49,373 49,976 $191,915 $202,745 $220,570 $225,553 Economy/Tax Base U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Approve Recommendation for Residential Recycling Request for Proposal Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve staff recommendation for residential recycling collection contract and provide direction for staff to begin negotiations with vendor. INTRODUCTION: At the March 5, 2019 City Council meeting, staff was directed to conduct community engagement to determine resident sentiment regarding frequency of recycling collection. The public engagement report is attached. Staff will review the curbside recycling contract process and present staff recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Approve Recommendation for Residential Recycling Request for Proposal Recycling Phone Survey Summary Public Engagement Report May 7, 2019 Mayor and City Council Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist/Recycling Coordinator Tara Brown, Sustainability Manager Approve Recommendation for Residential Recycling Request for Proposal Information / Background: Edina has provided residential curbside recycling collection since 1985. The current bi-weekly citywide 7- year contract for residential recycling collection with Republic Services will end on December 31, 2019. As a result, a request for proposals (RFP) for curbside residential recycling collection was released. Three companies responded to the request for proposals: Republic Services, Waste Management and Eureka Recycling. At the March 5, 2019, City Council meeting, staff presented three options for moving forward with selection of a recycling vendor, as shown below: 1. Award bi-weekly collection contract with Republic Services – public engagement to determine resident interest in weekly collection 2. Award weekly collection contract with Eureka Recycling beginning January 1, 2020 3. Defer contract, conduct public engagement regarding weekly vs. bi-weekly by May 1, 2019, and award contract by May 7, 2019 Option three was selected by Council. Public Engagement Summary After receiving direction at the March 5 Council meeting, staff utilized a public input process to gather data regarding the community’s preference on recycling frequency. Two methods were used to gather input. 1. The Morris Leatherman Company was contracted to conduct a phone survey regarding recycling pickup frequency. 2. A recycling project page was created on Better Together Edina. This project page hosted a forum for residents to comment regarding recycling pickup frequency. STAFF REPORT Page 2 The full report of the public engagement process is attached. Staff used this information to determine the following recommendation. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends selecting the bi-weekly collection proposal submitted by Republic Services. This proposal contains the lowest per household monthly cost at $3.59. Republic Services is the current vendor, which allows residents to keep the existing carts. 1 The Morris Leatherman Company 2019 CITY OF EDINA RESIDENT SURVEY OF RECYCLING SERVICES SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Curbside Recycling Service Preference: Respondents were told: The City contract for curbside recycling collection ends on December 31, 2019. The City is considering two options. The first would be to keep the curbside recycling collection the same and have it collected every other week. Starting on 2020, the cost to residents would be $3.59 per month. Another option would be to switch to collection every week. The cost to residents for this option would be $6.47 per month starting in 2020. They were then asked: Which do you prefer – every week or bi-weekly curbside recycling collection? Do you feel strongly that way? Preference Response Every week/strongly 14% Every week 18% Bi-weekly 28% Bi-weekly/strongly 23% Don’t care (Volunteered) 17% Don’t know/refused 1% By a 51%-32% majority, respondents prefer the current bi-weekly service. Intense opinions also split in favor of the current service schedule by an over 3-to-2 margin. Respondents offering an opinion were asked a follow-up question: Could you tell me one or two reasons for your decision? Reason Response WEEKLY: Not enough room/Cart overflows 29% Won’t have to wait as long if collection is missed 2% Less recyclables end up in trash 2% Won’t have to remember collection week 2% Less odors 2% 2 BI-WEEKLY: Have enough cart space 31% Fine as is 13% Opposed to higher fee 12% No extra truck traffic 5% SCATTERED 1% The key reason for the support of weekly recycling collection is “lack of room in the current resulting in a potential overflow;” this issue alone is raised by 78% of the supporters. There are three main reasons for support of the current bi-weekly system. The major one is “currently having enough cart space.” Two subsidiary reasons are “collection system is fine as is” and “opposed to a higher fee.” Arguments in Favor and Opposed to a Recycling Collection Schedule Change: Respondents were initially instructed: Let me read you some of the arguments people are making in SUPPORT of switching to weekly curbside recycling collection. For each one, please tell me if it makes you much more likely to SUPPORT the switch, somewhat more likely to SUPPORT it, or if it makes no difference to you. The table below shows the statement followed by the percent who report it makes them “much more likely” to support the change and the percent who report the argument makes no difference to them. Argument Much More Likely No Difference A recent study by Hennepin county indicated almost 15 of trash collected was recyclable material 20% 54% It is frustrating being out of town or missing collection day and then having to wait another two weeks 33% 46% There is not enough room in the recycling cart to hold all the material accumulated over two weeks 24% 64% Bear in mind most of the respondents reporting they are much more likely to support the change already support a weekly collection; in other words, the arguments strengthen initial opinions. The only argument reaching a moderate impact, at 33%, is frustration over being out of town or missing collection days and then waiting another two weeks. Next, respondents were instructed: Let me read you some of the arguments people are making in SUPPORT of keeping bi-weekly curbside recycling collection. For each one, please tell me if it makes you much more likely to SUPPORT keeping bi-weekly collection, somewhat more likely to SUPPORT it, or if it makes no difference to you. The table below shows the statement, followed by the percent who report it makes them “much more likely” to support the current schedule and the percent who report the argument makes no difference to them. 3 Argument Much More Likely No Difference My needs are being met with current bi-weekly collection, there is no need to make this change 49% 38% Weekly collection will increase the number of trucks on city streets 35% 38% It is not worth the increase in cost for weekly recycling collection 38% 45% Again, bear in mind most of the respondents reporting they are much more likely to support the change already support a weekly collection; in other words, the arguments strengthen initial opinions. All three arguments post a greater impact than any of the arguments supporting the change. The major argument supporting no collection schedule change is the lack of need for weekly collection; but, increased cost and increased truck traffic both have a moderate impact on residents. Finally, the preference changes due to the six arguments were assessed: After hearing more information, sometimes residents change their minds.... Which do you prefer – every week or bi-weekly curbside recycling collection? Do you feel strongly that way? New Preference Response Every week/strongly 16% Every week 18% Bi-weekly 26% Bi-weekly/strongly 28% Don’t care (Vol.) 13% “Don’t care” responses dropped by four percent and were evenly split between the two collection schedules. Overall, by a 54%-34% majority, residents favor the current collection system. Sample Demographics: Respondents were initially asked: Approximately how many years have you lived in the City of Edina? Residential Longevity Response Less than two years 5% Two to five years 12% Six to ten years 19% 11 to 20 years 27% 21 to 30 years 16% Over thirty years 22% The median residential longevity is 16.1 years. Thirty-six percent resided in Edina for ten years or less, 27% lived there for 11-to-20 years, and 38% resided in the City for 21 years or more. 4 Next, household composition was assessed: Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following age groups live in your household? Let’s start with the oldest. Be sure to include yourself. First, persons 65 or over? Number in Household Response None 71% One 17% Two or more 12% Refused 1% Twenty-nine percent of Edina households contain seniors. Adults under 65? Number in Household Response None 16% One 14% Two 61% Three or more 9% Refused 1% Sixteen percent of Edina households are composed exclusively of seniors. The typical household contains two non-senior adults. School-aged or pre-school children? Number in Household Response None 65% One 15% Two 16% Three or more 4% Refused 1% School-aged or pre-school children can be found in 34% of Edina households. What is your age, please? Age of Respondent Response 18-34 16% 35-44 21% 45-54 20% 55-64 21% 65 and over 22% The median age of adult Edina residents is 51.3 years old. 5 Gender of respondent? Gender Response Male 48% Female 52% Women outnumbered men by two percent in the sample. Area of the City? Quadrant of the Community Response Northeast Quadrant 25% Northwest Quadrant 25% Southeast Quadrant 25% Southwest Quadrant 25% The residential location of residents is evenly split across the community. Conclusions: 1. Only about one-third of the community supports changing to a weekly recycling collection schedule. In fact, a majority of residents support the current bi-weekly collection of recyclables. Even after hearing arguments both in favor and opposed to a change, opinions remain essentially unchanged. 2. The most persuasive arguments – albeit very limited in their impact – pose “convenience” (missing collection day and then waiting two weeks) against “lack of need” (current schedule works for households and no need to increase costs). 3. Groups providing majorities in support of weekly collection include 6-10 year residents, households containing children, and 35-44 year olds. Groups posting even strong majorities supporting the current schedule include households containing seniors and single adult households. Groups more apt to be indifferent or undecided include less than two year residents and under 35 year olds. 4. Overall, this scheduling change appears to be a solution seeking a problem for a majority of residents. A schedule change is just not a “ripe” policy action now. Methodology: This study contains the results of a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected residents of the City of Edina. Survey responses were gathered by professional interviewers across the community between April 9th and 15th, 2019. The average interview took six minutes. The non-response rate was 3.0%. All respondents interviewed in this study were part of a randomly generated sample of Edina residents. In general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to their respective universe within ± 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. ENGAGEMENT REPORT I RECYCLING I CITY OF EDINA 1 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT PROJECT: RECYCLING COLLECTION FREQUENCY ENGAGEMENT PLAN DECISION TO BE MADE - Determine frequency of recycling collection (stay with bi-weekly or move to weekly) - Project Decision: Staff will make a recommendation to City Council PROJECT TIMELINE - March through May - Council decision May 7, 2019 - Service contract begins Jan. 1, 2020 PARTICIPATON LEVEL CONSULT - Goal: We will work directly with the public throughout the process to ensure that public concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered. - Promise: We will work to ensure that your concerns and aspirations are directly reflected in the alternatives developed and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. PROCESS 1. Project Introduction 2. Public Participation 3. Approval 4. Close the Loop ENGAGEMENT REPORT The recycling project page on Better Together Edina was launched on March 25. STAKEHOLDERS - Residents participating/paying for recycling collection ENGAGEMENT REPORT I RECYCLING I CITY OF EDINA 2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Date Techniques Measures April 1 to Present - Better Together Edina Project Page - Site Visits: 1.3K - Aware Visitors: 872 - Informed Visitors: 535 - Engaged Visitors: 170 - FAQ Views: 115 April 1-19 - Forum (tool on Better Together) - 160 Comments April 8-19 - Phone Survey - 400 residents FINDINGS DESIRED INPUT The public input process was designed around answering these two questions. 1. How often residents prefer recycling pickup 2. What drives their preference on pickup frequency PHONE SURVEY The phone survey was conducted by the Morris Leatherman Company. This survey offers the City statistically relevant information with the following findings. Bi-weekly 51% Weekly 32%. FORUM The City hosted recycling forums on Better Together Edina to offer a way for those to be part of the conversation if they were not randomly selected phone survey. The forums had active participation for 20 days. On the first day, the City sent communication about the project page going live which resulted in the page being visited over 1,000 times by 374 visitors. These numbers represent a strong community interest in the topic. Staff conducted an analysis of the forums and identified supporting comments for each bi-weekly and weekly. Bi-weekly 72 comments, Weekly 78 comments. Outside of Project (10 comments). In addition to signifying recycling pick up frequency, we received comments on the following topics. These topics expand outside of this project decision. - Organics collection - Organized hauling - Open hauling - Customer Service Issues - Recycling techniques - End Result of recycling PREFERENCE DRIVERS In both the phone survey and forum, the feedback on “why” individuals select a specific frequency are similar. Weekly Preference Bi-Weekly Preference - Capacity Issue - No Capacity Issue - Truck Volume ENGAGEMENT REPORT I RECYCLING I CITY OF EDINA 3 FEEDBACK SUMMARY There is significant community interest in the decision around recycling frequency. The public input process has provided information to show while there are drivers to consider moving to weekly, it may not be a large enough “appetite” at this time. NEXT STEPS CITY COUNCIL - Council approval of recycling collection frequency CLOSE THE LOOP The City will let the public know how their input influenced the decision. - What input was used - What input was not used, and why The public input process highlighted a common capacity challenge with bi-weekly recycling for some residents. When staff closes the loop, there is an opportunity to better understand what is driving the capacity issue and present options (i.e. education, additional bins, etc). Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Comprehensive Housing Strategy Task Force Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the Comprehensive Housing Strategy Task Force and direct staff to initiate implementation. INTRODUCTION: The City Council has previously discussed the advisability of establishing an ad hoc task force to develop a comprehensive housing strategy for the City. The task force charge document to create such an ad hoc task force is attached. If approved by the Council, staff will begin immediate implementation with a goal of completing the assigned task by the end of this calendar year. ATTACHMENTS: Description Comprehensive Housing Strategy Task Force EDINA ADVISORY TASK FORCE I HOUSING STRATEGY I CITY OF EDINA Page 1 CITY COUNCIL TASK FORCE CHARGE PROJECT: EDINA HOUSING STRATEGY PURPOSE Support the City’s development of a comprehensive housing strategy. OBJECTIVE Gatherer information, perspectives and provide analysis that assists in the development of a comprehensive housing strategy for the community. STRATEGIES Stage 1: - Obtain public input on experiences with housing in Edina - Study other communities and best practices - Review past City studies/initiatives, including the 2006 Housing Succession Plan Stage 2: - Develop a recommendation for City Council using information from stage 1 TIMELINE - May 2019 through December 2019 KEY DATES May 7, 2019 Council authorizes the establishment of City Council Task Force June 4, 2019 City Council appoints Task Force members STAGE 1: GATHER INFORMATION/EXPLORATORY Aug. 7, 2019 Task Force presents initial findings report for Council to affirm (work session) STAGE 2: HOUSING STRATEGIES/RECOMMENDATION Dec. 3, 2019 Task Force presents final strategy to Council Dec. 17, 2019 Council adopts final strategy COMMITMENT - Appointed members will be asked to fulfill their work until Council adopts the final strategy in December 2019 - Appointed members should expect to meet at least monthly with additional off-line work - Appointed members should consider project timeline prior to appointments MEETINGS EDINA ADVISORY TASK FORCE I HOUSING STRATEGY I CITY OF EDINA Page 2 - The Task Force will establish their schedule including meeting times and dates as needed to complete the work - Conclusion of work must fall into the indicated timeline - Meetings are public LEVEL OF AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL The establishment and appointments of a City Council Task Force are conducted by the Council. The Council has the authority to appoint/remove members. CITY MANAGER The City Manager has the authority to: - Designate the Staff Liaison and any additional staff support needed - Authorize financial resources - Enter into a service contract with a subject matter expert/consultant - Make recommendations to Council on adjustments to this Task Force charge TASK FORCE The Task Force has the authority to: - Conduct public engagement and collect input using the City’s public engagement protocols - Make adjustments/refinements to the strategy based on input and research - Recommend the final strategy which will be presented to Council for consideration TASK FORCE LEADERSHIP City Council will designate a member of the Task Force to serve as the Chair and another member as the Vice Chair. The role of the chair will include: - Prepare agenda - Lead meetings and facilitate discussions - Maintain meeting decorum - Encourage participation of all members The Vice Chair will support the Chair as needed and perform the chair duties if the Chair is unavailable. STAFF LIAISON City Manager will designate the staff liaison to the Task Force. Liaison role includes: - Support Task Force chair in preparing agendas and meeting materials - Provide technical expertise and access to City resources - Relay information from City Council to Task Force and vice versa - Submit packet materials for City Council review The Task Force does not direct the work of the liaison. RESOURCES AVAILABLE EDINA ADVISORY TASK FORCE I HOUSING STRATEGY I CITY OF EDINA Page 3 - The Task Force will have access to City resources available for advisory groups i.e. marketing/communications, meeting supplies, etc - Also, see City Manager’s level of authority OUTCOMES - Comprehensive housing strategy with the following priorities: o Types of housing o Sizes o Affordability o Location MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION The City of Edina’s Volunteer Edina program will manage the recruitment, application and onboarding process. CONSIDERATIONS & COMPOSITION City Council will appoint up to seven members with a variety of perspectives and experiences on housing in the community. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Receive Petition Requesting Street Reconstruction of Woodland Road and Brookview Avenue with Curb & Gutter and Storm Sewer Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to receive the petition and refer it to the Engineering Department for consideration. INTRODUCTION: This is an amendment to a petition that was submitted to Council Nov. 7, 2018. T he amended petition includes four new signatures that were not on the original petition. On Mar. 19, staff recommended "completing street reconstruction of the Woodland Road area when it is due as part of our P avement Management Program. Therefore, we recommend no action on this particular petition." ATTACHMENTS: Description Woodland Road & Brookview Avenue Amended Petition between 4 KJoodkuld -Read and 30 WOba between ADDRESS (4)1 13(COVVi etc Av€ and ADDRESS 610(,5 Bi'ooLvinu Ave between ADDRESS and ADDRESS between ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS W od lard 'Road LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME i{covvift,) p-ve, LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) t.'d,e, I I dean Ry(i-e/( (.4-plet Q [-CA/ (4,1 Vet vt City of Edina, Minnesota -AYY1-eVdrn-evt, CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD cr6 DAnr il EIVED: itr7 irr PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL 0 SIDEWALK STORM SEWER q CURB AND GUTTER ONLY To the Mayor and City Council: 0 ALLEY PAVING 0 WATER MAIN 0 SANITARY SEWER D STREET LIGHTING PERMANENT STREET 0 OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. This petition was circulated by: PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) t q wood ki.vi iN v\,[us, -0 91. 43 c,c,ovULAitd_ S 4004 NAME tti ()(141-j lik) 00d ickmd Ron ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (PRINTED) PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. A1=4111_2008 Emily & John McWhite 16 Woodland Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 612-805-1577 jkmcwhite@cbburnet.com March 14, 2019 Mr. Chad A. Millner Director of Engineering City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Woodland Road Street Reconstruction Dear Mr. Millner: I live at 16 Woodland Road and have for the last 4 years. Although we absolutely love the neighborhood, the road has been a constant problem and it's getting worse. We have 3 young boys (10, 8, 4) and unfortunately, the road has become so bad that it's impacting our enjoyment of the neighborhood. In the summer, the road is constantly holding water and the pot holes become so bad that it's difficult for them to ride their bikes or even play. We have no drainage or storm sewer and due to that it's also ruining my lawn, along with my neighbors. In the winter be we have no drainage, the street is like a skating rink. It's dangerous to even go for a walk. This, along with other reasons is why I am one of the persons signing the most recent petition pertaining to Woodland Road. I ask that you please reconsider our proposal to re- due the street. Every professional I have spoken with has looked at the situation and agrees that the street was not engineered properly and needs to be permanently fixed. I have a copy of your report and your recommendation and I know you would feel differently if you saw firsthand what the street looks like during rain storm or the week following it. I look forward to your response. Yours truly, Emily and John McWhite Cc: James Hovland, Mayor A---Trfwv, iv( vi From: Tina Steger tinags424@gmail.com e Subject: Woodland Road - Petition Amendment Date: April 2, 2019 at 9:49 AM To: CityCouncil@edinamn.gov To our City Council, I am writing to voice my concern in reference to the Woodland Road Petition. I understand the petition which the residents of Woodland Road recently submitted requesting the improvement of Woodland Road, including water drainage solutions, was denied. This concerns me as a resident because the road has serious deficiencies in its ability to properly manage the flow of water. Our home was a new construction that was completed in December of 2017, so I am confident in the grading that was completed on our lot, specifically because it was completely re-graded during the construction and landscaping process. Along with our builder and landscaper, we worked diligently to mitigate water table issues on our own lot, so we are fully aware that our immediate neighborhood has a high water table. Consequently, it is imperative that water is adequately managed with proper curbs, gutters and storm drains, all of which are currently lacking on our road. As an example, I have attached a photograph for your reference. This photo was taken today and depicts the large pool of standing water directly in front of our lot and driveway. The water collects from flow from homes on a higher slope than ours and pools in front of our home... right where our children wait for and return from the school bus every day. This situation creates an unsanitary environment over which we have no control as it can only be remedied with an improvement of the road and implementation of adequate curbs, gutters and storm drains. I see similar standing pools of water in front of several neighboring homes, as well. Kindly review and reconsider our petition seeking an improved road for our beautiful street and lovely neighborhood. We appreciate your consideration. Sincerely, Tina & Todd Steger 22 Woodland Road Fk) tlrl Vti//tc IM Y) nr.evric af-fer i-t- was 1401- KOOMA-erld-e0( -1'haf 6"1444v PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 4111° ed by: This petition 116)4 (-k CIACLI'V) NAME {; \t\i (cci (Ad Id Pc, ckd ADDRESS (;hei yi PHONE PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD ifikQpet-, DATE RECEIVE9j_I- 1 r 0 SIDEWALK 0 ALLEY PAVING 0 WATER MAIN STORM SEWER 111 SANITARY SEWER 0 STREET LIGHTING 0 CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET 0 OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. '1 Wood icul d "Road and 30 Woodic4-id go Rd ADDRESS AVe ADDRESS 51.0 I 2_ '13 t a0- vi 6 10 and r-- tO 1 5 .-6100 K_V ICI) AVE. ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS and oodla_rid '20(0 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME mov_vieu A e LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between between between between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) -'1,1ery iociK HefrufLia A-ukt 4 te-GtV _\(.4 c16,v L1/4) ÷r-vin-3 c -j A4/ .A) r ( 6-4_ .40_10 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) V00001fri -?octal ,910 i)U0 0 d 14 0 oe4 11- Rci OZ'( CA/oecaaq QC( e) ;37:Cot-A_ There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) eh r bact.vtfl lip Pt crc&e"g. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) woocitciytd Road V- woobt*-4> fql> 22- Woolko-.4) goAA Pr AIL Fr/ KAI tiMA 171)6 \N11 01( ,Kifiqditio4-ttoit Wok() te4--e.ev abs of-- 0 orr,,_ cic ole_ (?)(iqh 4 l'Avv\f if This petition was circulated by: Avevt-(1 OLIE t-1-6(At arav) 1 MOaliCak( 400teL ADDRESS The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 aketece/' 4/914c1 Azo /61,24) 1 • 1•• CA. cu-ettrx-14-11-)Tb (4306,0 Lent)(A eckacgzvet rea r er2-r gfietIngUkce, al 1 rp. vitvlat- • d • 2 _ Lir —de rah* PHONE Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached is correspondence received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina MN 55410-1756 no dashes or spaces Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Thursday, May 2, 2019 Mayor and City Council, Enclosed please find 1 letter with 2 attachments, concerning false pretense that was used to justify the City's removal of Building Height restrictions from the current draft of the City of Edina’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan 10-year Update document. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png 2019May2_Letter to CC_CompPlanBuildingHeight.pdf 525.49KB ATT-1)_2018_CP_PDF132_Text3- 42_Item12_Height.pdf 354.85KB ATT-2)_2019Feb13_MetC-CDC_Edina_7200- 7250Fr.pdf 1.07MB 2019May2_Letter to CC_CompPlanBuildingHeight R. Castellano, Page 1 of 2 Delivered via the online Correspondence Submission Form Mayor and City Council, Many residents of Edina have been concerned about the pace of development in Edina, and the scope approved for many developments, e.g. Density and Height. Let’s look at the issue of Building Height. Adding Building Height limits into the Comprehensive Plan in the 2008 Update was one way to recognize the significance of this issue within our community. Many residents are concerned because the City has removed Building Height limits from the citywide 2018 Comprehensive Plan 10-year Update Draft Document. In the Comp Plan Draft (Table of Contents dated 3-6-2019), in Paragraph #12 on PDF Page 132 / Text Page 3-42, the City states that removing height restrictions “will allow for more flexibility in the development review process.” [ATT-1] https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6290/City-of-Edina-Comprehensive-Plan-2018-Draft- PDF I don’t know about you, but when I see the word “flexibility”, I immediately think of the Estelle towers that were proposed in what is supposed to be a transition area to the Cornelia neighborhood (and which was ultimately defeated due to an uproar of protest from the neighborhood)! How big of a problem has Building Height been? At the April 18, 2017 City Council Public Hearing for the Nolan Mains project (Edina Market Street) at 50th & France, Community Development Director Cary Teague’s testified to this issue during his presentation. Here is a link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXB6QOZFFCU 35.37 Cary Um, in- as we were preparing for our upcoming Comprehensive Plan, the Met has [clears throat]. We’ve had a lot of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, just regarding height, and the feedback that we typically get is, that’s really a function of zoning and not a Comprehensive Plan. But that was not true, and you do not have to take my word for it. Let’s check the Met Council’s Comp Plan Review Record for Edina, from 2008 to the present. The most up-to-date record that I am aware of is from Feb 13, 2019, the Met Council’s Community Development Committee (CDC) report, which was prepared due to Edina’s request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) for the 7200-7250 France Avenue project. [ATT-2] The CDC report itself is an 11-page pdf. The “Review Record” starts on the third page, with the list of Comp Plan amendments beginning down at the bottom, under the heading “Previous Council Actions”, starting with 20413-1, Edina’s 2008 Comp Plan 10-yr Update (the 2030 Plan). Each CPA after that is described in a bulleted paragraph, and is numbered in succession, so 20413-2, 20413-3, 20413-4, etc. It is efficient and easy to follow. Now, if you look at each bulleted paragraph in order, you will see, for example, several where the Land Use Planning Category was changed. 2019May2_Letter to CC_CompPlanBuildingHeight R. Castellano, Page 2 of 2 However, by the time you get to Nolan Mains in July-Nov 2017, “the Mixed Use Center (MXC) Districts – Density and Height amendment” at 20413-10 and 20413-11, you will realize that you have not yet seen a single amendment “just regarding height”. Moreover, it appears the first “Height Only” amendment did not occur until AFTER the Nolan Mains hearings. On PDF Page 5, at the top, you will read that: “The Building Height at 6000 France amendment (Review File No. 20413-13) was reviewed administratively on January 11, 2018”. Director Teague reiterated his statement one year later at the City Council’s April 17, 2018 public hearing for the 3650 Hazelton project (Guitar Center site). However, he did not qualify it as “just” for height, but I think you will see that such exclusivity is implied. Here is a link to that video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6yGxcuBIiE 27:22 Cary Um, what staff and the Planning Commission are recommending for the height, uh, we’ve talked about this, and the Council directed staff and the Planning Commission to take a look at, um. As you know, over the last 10 years, we’ve received a lot of Comprehensive Plan Amendments for height. In order to justify a need for greater “flexibility” in building height, the City has publicly utilized a false pretense. During the public hearing for the 3650 Hazelton project, the Council did approve language in the CPA to weaken the Comp Plan Height limits, which involved a number of areas in the city. I call on the City Council to not approve the citywide Comp Plan Update as currently drafted. Further, until the City accomplishes open, upstanding, and forthcoming communications with the public concerning this matter, and pending the results of such communications, Building Height restrictions should remain in the citywide 2018 Edina Comprehensive Plan 10-year Update document. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410-1756 Encl: ATT-1)_2018_CP_PDF132_Text3-42_Item12_Height (1 page) ATT-2)_2019Feb13_MetC-CDC_Edina_7200-7250Fr (11 pages) (GLQD&RPSUHKHQVLYH3ODQ /DQG8VHDQG&RPPXQLW\'HVLJQ&KDSWHU'UDIW ´(GJHµ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o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·V]RQLQJFRGHDQGLQWKHVPDOODUHDSODQV Page - 1 Committee Report Business Item No. 2019-31 Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of February 13, 2019 Subject: City of Edina Office Residential (OR) District Density Amendment (7200/7250 France), Review File No. 20413-17 Proposed Action 1. Adopt the attached Review Record and allow the City of Edina to place the Office Residential (OR) District Density Amendment (7200/7250 France) into effect. 2. Find that the amendment does not change the City’s forecasts. 3. Advise the City to implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Forecasts and Housing. Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Senior Planner Michael Larson presented the staff’s report to the Committee. No representatives from the City of Edina were in attendance. The Community Development Committee unanimously recommended approval of the proposed action with no questions or discussion at its meeting on February 4, 2019. Page - 1 Business Item No. 2019-31 Community Development Committee Meeting date: February 4, 2019 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of February 13, 2019 Subject: City of Edina Office Residential (OR) District Density Amendment (7200/7250 France), Review File No. 20413-17 District(s), Member(s): District 5, Vacant Policy/Legal Reference: Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. § 473.175) Staff Prepared/Presented: Michael Larson, AICP, Senior Planner, Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1407) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Planning Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the attached Review Record and allow the City of Edina to place the Office Residential (OR) District Density Amendment (7200/7250 France) into effect. 2. Find that the amendment does not change the City’s forecasts. 3. Advise the City to implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Forecasts and Housing. Background The amendment proposes to increase the allowable density range for the Office Residential (OR) District at 7200/7250 France Avenue from 12-30 units per acre to 12-60 units per acre. The amendment supports a development by France Equities, LLC that includes 299 units and 30,000 square feet of retail space on 5.2 acres. Twenty percent of the units (60 units) are affordable to households at or below 60% of the Area Median Income. Rationale The proposed amendment conforms to regional system plans, is consistent with Council policies, and is compatible with the plans of other local communities and school districts. Thrive Lens The proposed amendment is reviewed against the land use policies in Thrive MSP 2040. To achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive, the metropolitan development guide defines the Land Use Policy for the region and includes strategies for local governments and the Council to implement. These policies and strategies are interrelated and, taken together, serve to achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive. Funding None. Known Support / Opposition None known. Page - 1 Review Record City of Edina Office Residential (OR) District Density Amendment (7200/7250 France) Review File No. 20413-17, Council Business Item No. 2019-31 BACKGROUND The City of Edina (City) is a first-ring suburban community of approximately 16 square miles, located in southeastern Hennepin County. It is bordered by the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Richfield, and St. Louis Park (Figure 1). Consistent with the policies adopted by the Council in June 2014 (Business Item 2014-143) regarding review of local comprehensive plans, this amendment is being reviewed under Thrive MSP 2040 and its policy plans. The proposed amendment was found complete for review after January 1, 2016. Thrive MSP 2040 (Thrive) designates the City with an “Urban” community designation. The Council forecasts that from 2017 to 2040 the City will grow from 52,497 to 59,600 population and 22,657 to 27,200 households. The Council also forecasts that between 2017 and 2040, the City’s employment will increase from 48,521 to 56,100 jobs. The Metropolitan Council reviewed the City of Edina 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update (Update), Review File No. 20413-1, on August 12, 2009. This is the fifteenth amendment since the Update was reviewed. REQUEST SUMMARY The amendment proposes to increase the allowable density range for the Office Residential (OR) District at 7200/7250 France Avenue from 12-30 units per acre to 12-60 units per acre. The amendment supports a development by France Equities, LLC that includes 299 units and 30,000 square feet of retail space on 5.2 acres. Twenty percent of the units (60 units) are affordable to households at or below 60% of the Area Median Income. OVERVIEW Conformance with Regional Systems The amendment conforms to the Regional System Plans for Parks, Transportation (including Aviation), and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these plans. Consistency with Council Policies The amendment is consistent with the Thrive MSP 2040, with the Housing Policy Plan, with water resources management, and is consistent with Council forecasts. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Jurisdictions The amendment will not have an impact on adjacent communities, school districts, or watershed districts, and is compatible with the plans of those districts. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIONS • The Council acted on the City’s Update on August 12, 2009 (Review File No. 20413-1, Business Item No. 2009-239). Page - 2 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • The Council acted on the Waters amendment (Review File No. 20413-2, Business Item No. 2010-232) on June 21, 2010. The amendment reguided 6.27 acres from Public/Semi-Public to High Density Residential to support a 150-unit senior nursing and assisted living complex. • The Residential Density Range Adjustments for Mixed-Use Areas amendment (Review File No. 20413-3) was reviewed administratively on June 27, 2014. The amendment corrected erroneous density designations for residential development within the City’s mixed-use districts that were inconsistent with other elements of the comprehensive plan. • The Lennar amendment (Review File No. 20413-4) was reviewed administratively on June 27, 2014. The amendment re-guided 1.2 acres from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center to support a mixed unit development on a larger site that included 240 housing units. • The Council acted on the Regional Medical District amendment (Review File No. 20413-5, Business Item No. 2014-273) on November 12, 2014. The amendment amended the Regional Medical District to allow both senior housing and affordable housing with supportive services at a density range of 12-80 dwelling units per acre. • The Pedestrian Facilities amendment (Review File No. 20413-6) was reviewed administratively on January 9, 2015. The amendment revised the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Transportation element of its comprehensive plan. • The Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan amendment (Review File No. 20413-7) was reviewed administratively on November 13, 2015. The amendment incorporated the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan into the City’s comprehensive plan, created a new land use designation of Neighborhood Node, and reguided 6.5 acres from Neighborhood Commercial and High Density Residential to Neighborhood Node. • The Council acted on the CAC Density and Gateway Point amendment (Review File No. 20413- 8, Business Item No. 2016-33) on February 24, 2016. The amendment increased the maximum allowable residential density in the Community Activity Center (CAC) district from 75 to 105 dwelling units per acre, and re-guided approximately 0.3 acres from Low Density Residential to CAC. • The Council acted on the Millennium at Southdale amendment (Review File No. 20413-9, Business Item No. 2016-152) on July 27, 2016. The amendment reguided 8.08 acres from Regional Medical District (RMD) to Community Activity Center (CAC), which supported a 372-unit residential development project on 5.67 acres. The Council increased the City’s forecasts by 400 households and 1,000 population in 2020, 2030, and 2040. • The City submitted the Mixed Use Center (MXC) Districts – Density and Height amendment (Review File No. 20413-10) on July 14, 2017, which was suspended by the City on August 2, 2017 and then subsequently withdrawn on September 26, 2017. • The Council acted on the Mixed Use Center (MXC) District – Density and Height amendment (Review File No. 20413-11, Business Item No. 2017-249) on November 8, 2017. The amendment increased the maximum allowable residential density in areas guided as MXC in the Grandview and 50th & France Districts from 30 to 100 dwelling units per acre. The amendment also increased the maximum allowable height for buildings along Market Street. The amendment was associated with 165-unit senior housing development proposal in the Grandview District and a 100-unit, mixed-use development proposal in the 50th & France District. The Council increased the City’s forecasts by 300 households and 700 population in 2020, 2030, and 2040. • The Edina Flats amendment (Review File No. 20413-12) was reviewed administratively on January 4, 2018. The amendment reguided 0.6 acres from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Node. The project supported the Edina Flats development, an 18-unit owner- occupied residential development on 1.27 acres. Page - 3 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • The Building Height at 6000 France amendment (Review File No. 20413-13) was reviewed administratively on January 11, 2018. The amendment changed the mapped height guidance in its comprehensive plan (from 4 to 8 stories) associated with a redevelopment project at 6600 France Avenue. • The Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update (AUAR Update) (Review File No. 20052-4) was reviewed administratively by Council staff on September 12, 2018. Council staff concluded that planned improvements to the regional wastewater system were sufficient to serve the development scenario that is associated with Review File 20413-14. • The Council acted on the (MXC) & Office Residential (OR) District Density and Building Height Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Review File 20413-14, Business Item 2018-321) on November 28, 2018. The amendment increased the allowable density range in the MXC District in the Greater Southdale Area to 100-150 dwelling units per acre and was associated with a 19- story, 186-unit apartment building on a 1.25-acre parcel at 3650 Hazelton Road. The amendment also increased the guiding density range to 30-55 units/acre for a specific set of parcels in the OR District in the Pentagon Park/Gateway Study Area that was associated with a multi-phase development proposal that could include up to 1,500 units. The Council increased the City’s household forecasts to 23,500 for 2020; 26,000 for 2030; and 27,200 for 2040. The Council also increased the City’s population forecasts to 53,700 for 2020; 57,900 for 2030; and 59,600 for 2040. • The Council acted on the 44th & France Neighborhood Node Small Area Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Review File 20413-15, Business Item 2018-327) on December 12, 2018. The amendment incorporated the Small Area Plan for area into the comprehensive plan and reguided 5.9 acres from Neighborhood Commercial (5-12 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Node (12-60 dwelling units per acre). • The Office Residential District Density Amendment (4100 76th Street) (Review File 20414-16) was reviewed administratively on January 14, 2019. The amendment increased the allowable density range for the Office Residential (OR) District at 4100 76th Street from 12-30 units per acre to 12-40 units per acre. The amendment supported an 80-unit affordable housing development. ISSUES I. Does the amendment conform to the regional system plans? II. Is the amendment consistent with Thrive MSP 2040 and other Council policies? III. Does the amendment change the City’s forecasts? IV. Is the amendment compatible with the plans of adjacent local governmental units and affected jurisdictions? ISSUES ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Conformance with Regional Systems The amendment conforms to the regional system plan for Regional Parks, Transportation, and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these system plans. Additional and advisory comments for regional parks and wastewater are included below. Regional Parks Reviewer: Colin Kelly (651-602-1407) The proposed amendment conforms to the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan. A portion of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail alignment is located on the south side of Gallagher Drive, which borders the south side of the amendment location (Figure 2). The increase in allowable density will not have an impact on Page - 4 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL the regional trail or other elements of the Regional Parks System. There are no other existing or planned regional parks, trails, or search corridors within 0.5 mile of the amendment location. Wastewater Reviewer: Roger Janzig (651-602-1029) The proposed amendment conforms to the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan. The amendment location is served by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Interceptors 1-RF-491 and 1-RF-491R, which have capacity for the increase in flow associated with the increase in allowable density. Consistency with Council Policy The amendment is consistent with Council policies for land use, forecasts, housing, and water resources. Additional review comments regarding consistency with land use, forecasts, and housing policies are detailed below. Land Use Reviewer: Michael Larson (651-602-1407) The proposed amendment is consistent with the land use policies in Thrive, which designates the City as an Urban community. The increase in density range is consistent with overall density expectations for Urban communities, which is a minimum of 10 units per acre for new growth, development, and redevelopment. The amendment is also consistent with the Thrive policy to “align land use, development patterns, and infrastructure to make the best use of public and private investment.” As shown in Figure 3, the amendment area is currently guided as Office Residential with a residential density range of 12-30 dwelling units per acre (units/acre). The guiding land use remains the same, but the amendment increases the allowable density range at this location to 12-60 units/acre. Table 1. City of Edina Planned Residential Density 2010-2030 Change Density Range Net Acres Min Units Max Units Category Min Max Medium Density Residential 5 12 21 105 252 Neighborhood Node 5 12 7.1 36 85 Neighborhood Node - 44th & France 12 60 5.9 71 354 High Density Residential 12 30 48.67 584 1460 Office Residential - 4100 W. 76th Street 12 40 2 24 80 Office Residential - 7200/7250 France Ave. 12 60 5.2 62 312 Office Residential - Gateway 30 55 28.91 867 1590 Community Activity Center (CAC)- 5% Res 12 75 7.16 86 537 Regional Medical District 12 80 42.4 509 3392 Mixed Use Center - 50th/France & Grandview 12 100 4.55 55 455 Mixed Use Center - Greater Southdale 100 150 1.25 125 188 TOTALS 174.14 2523 8705 Overall Density 14.49 49.99 Table 1 shows guiding land uses, densities, and acreage of expected redevelopment in the City, with changes shown underlined. As a result of the amendment, the acreage at 7200/7250 France Avenue is Page - 5 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL now added to planned land use inventory as it had not been previously expected to change from its current land use. This reguiding has a slight impact on the City’s overall minimum planned density, which decreases from 14.57 to 14.49 units per acre. The decrease in overall minimum density is due to the reguided minimum density being slightly lower than the City’s current overall planned density. Forecasts Reviewer: Todd Graham (651-602-1322) The amendment increases the allowable density range for 7200/7250 France Avenue, associated with a development with 299 units. The amendment is consistent with a proposed forecast revision that City and Council staff have discussed accompanying the City’s 2040 comprehensive plan update. A forecast adjustment is not needed with this amendment. Advisory Comments As the City prepares the 2040 comprehensive plan update, Council staff advise that 2020, 2030, and 2040 forecasts should be adjusted to fit known developments and planned land uses. Housing Reviewer: Hilary Lovelace (651-602-1555) The amendment is consistent with the Council’s 2040 Housing Policy Plan. The City currently provides sufficient land to address its share of the region’s 2011-2020 need for affordable housing, which is 212 units. After this amendment, the City will be guiding more than 140 acres of medium- and high-density and mixed-use residential land such that at least 2,215 units could be built. The project associated the amendment will include 60 units (twenty percent) that are affordable to households at or below 60% of the Area Median Income (AMI), consistent with the City’s Affordable Housing Policy for projects that require comprehensive plan amendments. The most recent affordable housing planned in Edina is an 80-unit development proposed by Aeon for 4100 West 76th Street. All 80 units would be affordable to households at 60% of AMI. The Council administratively reviewed an amendment associated with this project on January 14, 2019 (Review File 20414-16). The City participates in Livable Communities Act (LCA) programs and has requested and received grant funds recently. In 2017, the City received a Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) grant award of $338,900 for the construction of 110 mixed-income apartments in their 49½ Street Mixed Use Redevelopment project. In 2016, the City received a total of $1,300,000 in grants from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account-Transit Oriented Development (LCDA-TOD) and Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) as well as project-based vouchers. These resources supported the Beacon Interfaith 66 West project, which opened in 2017 and provides 39 rental units for youth experiencing homelessness. Advisory Comments The City should be aware that with the City’s share of the region’s 2021-2030 need for affordable housing is 1,220 units. In preparing the 2040 comprehensive plan, the City should note that the minimum density of land guided to address this need is 8 units per acre. The City is encouraged to contact their Sector Representative or Council housing staff with any questions regarding the Council’s housing policy for the 2040 comprehensive plan. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Governmental Units and Plans of Affected Special Districts and School Districts The proposed amendment is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. Page - 6 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ATTACHMENTS Figure 1: Location Map Showing Community Designations Figure 2: Location Map Showing Regional Systems Figure 3: Guiding Land Use Page - 7 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 1: Location Map Showing Community Designations Page - 8 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 2: Location Map Showing Regional Systems Page - 9 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 3: Guiding Land Use 7200 / 7250 France Avenue amendment location City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Carole Chivatero 7056 Cahill Rd Edina Mn 55439 6126187601 no dashes or spaces carolej@juno.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Good day Council Members, I would like to express my concerns about the Amundson Flats project. I do not feel this project fits the neighborhood for a variety of reasons. Traffic during rush hours is already tremendously difficult and 60+ additional cars, buses and school buses will make it unbearable. There is no easy way to turn left from 70th on to Amundson without causing tremendous backups and there are already huge backups at 70th and Cahill. The project created parking does not appear to be adequate for the additional vehicles. I further question the need to add a 100% affordable housing project to any neighborhood. All other affordable housing consists of a percentage of the project. this project does not provide resident children with green recreational space. Please do not move forward on the project without a traffic study. I believe that is minimally what you owe to the current Cahill residents. Thank you for giving my concerns consideration. Carole Chivatero Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Comments * Mayor & City Council Susan Covnick 4715 Golf Terrace Edina Minnesota 55424 9529200340 no dashes or spaces susan55424@gmail.com I would like to discuss consent agenda item "G" I have pictures of the Lake Harvey rain gardens that have not been maintained. The amount of $3,000 has been suggested by staff to correct the situation. I think this will not be sufficient to make the proper improvements. I have pictures of the problem. I would like to share the data I have gathered with the council. These two rain gardens on the shores of Lake Harvey were built in 2012 at a cost of $16,164.73...but they have received very little maintenance....There are safety and clearing of buckthorn issues... plus general cleaning of debris. File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Casey Casella, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission March 14, 2019 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the Energy and Environment Commission minutes of March 14, 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes of March 14, 2019 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/11/2019 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Energy and Environment Commission Edina City Hall Community Room Thursday, March 14, 2019, 7:00 PM I. Call To Order Chair Jackson called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call were Chair Jackson, Commissioners Horan, Hussian, Manser, Satterlee, Hoffman, and Glahn Late: Maynor Absent: Lanzas, Seeley, Fernands Staff Present: Liaison Brown III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Glahn made a motion to approve the March 14, 2019 meeting agenda. Commissioner Horan seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Commissioner Hoffman to approve the February 14, 2019 minutes. Motion seconded by Commissioner Horan. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Better Together Preview, MJ Lamon MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator, gave an update to the commission regarding the City’s new online engagement platform called Better Together. The platform aligns with budget goal #4 to foster an inclusive and engagement community. Commissioner Maynor arrived at 7:10 PM VI. Community Comment No Community Comments. VII. Reports/Recommendation A. Project Timelines for 2019 Work Plan Initiatives The Commission had a discussion on the 2019 work plan initiatives timelines. Updates discussed were: • Initiative 1: Promoting curbside organics. Organics will be presented to Council on May 19. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/11/2019 • Initiative 2: Business Recognition Program. Group met with Chamber of Commerce and is supportive. Will speak at the May 17 Chamber of Commerce Sunrise Breakfast. Will be doing a tiered recognition system. Looking at using kids during May of 2020 term if you have a project they really own. • Initiative 3: Building Energy Benchmarking. Plan to have stakeholder meeting on March 26 and April 10. April will bring a draft to vote on policy. • Initiative 4: Pollinator Resolution. Tom Swenson and Jessica Vanderweff Wilson met with Student Earth Group to discuss pollinator work on city. Discussion topics were: what is the statement of value and the city to hold accountable with turnover in staff and Council. • Initiative 5: Climate Action Plan. Plan to present a formal report to the group sometime between August to September. Commission to give lead commissioner input on needs and concerns. Satterlee requested commissioners to give her feedback in the next month or two. Reach out to Commissioner Lanzas and Fernands. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions A. Working Group Minutes • Minutes received from the BEWG Working Group. IX. Chair and Member Comments A. Joint Meeting of Energy and Environment Commission The Commission will provide their yearly update at the April 16 City Council work session. B. Ride and Drive Event in St Louis Park Commissioner Hoffman gave an update on an event in SLP on June 8 that the Commission could table at. C. Parking Lot Ideas The chair facilitated a discussion on updates for the commission’s work plan parking lot items. • The cities of Eden Prairie, Bloomington and Richfield are looking to coordinate an event with residents. • Liaison Brown reported the City is applying for a Green Corp member. D. EEC Initiative 5: Study and report on Climate Action Plan Framework Commissioner Satterlee covered her update in the Project Timelines for 2019 Work Plan Initiatives under the Reports and Recommendations section. E. Speaking Engagement Opportunity Chair Jackson was asked by Edina Indivisible to speak about climate change on April 24th at the Southdale Library. X. Staff Comments A. Comp Plan Public Meeting Update Liaison Brown gave an update on the March 11th Comprehensive plan meeting. The Comprehensive plan is on Better Together for public comment until April 8, 2019. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/11/2019 B. Chloride Reduction Liaison Brown gave an update on the chloride reduction bills SF 1667/HF 1502 in the MN State legislature. XI. Calendar of Events XII. Adjournment Motion made by Glahn to adjourn the March 14, 2019 meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion seconded by Hussain. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Tara Brown Sustainability Manager Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: C.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Transportation Commission, March 21, 2019 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes of the Transportation Commission from March 21, 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Transportation Commission, Mar 21, 2019 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/18/2019 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room March 21, 2019 I. Call To Order Chair Richman called the meeting to order II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Ayelomi, Johnson, Kane, McCarthy, Richman, Ruthruff Absent: Commissioner Ahler, Olson, Scherer, Veluvali, Zimbwa III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner McCarthy to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Ruthruff and seconded by Commissioner Johnson approving the February 21, 2019 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations Community Engagement Coordinator, MJ Lamon presented the new community engagement site, www.bettertogetheredina.org. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2018 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Report Planner Scipioni presented the 2018 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report. B. Proposed 2019-2020 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Projects Planner Scipioni presented the proposed 2019-2020 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Projects • Some suggestions were made in regards to the upcoming projects. o Temporary bike and pedestrian facilities should be installed on W 60th St during construction in Chowen Park A/B and W 58th St. o Show past and future projects on one map. • Comment was made about lack of equity between bike projects and sidewalk projects. • Comment was made expressing the desire to view proposed projects through race & equity lens Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/18/2019 C. Traffic Safety Report of February 26, 2019 Motion was made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by commissioner Ruthruff to approve the February 26, 2019 traffic safety report. All voted Aye. Motion Carried. D. 2019 Work Plan Updates • #1 Two meetings will be held with the working group on 3/25 and 4/15 • #3 Community columns will be published in the Sun Current • #4 Planning to continue service and possibly add a second loop VIII. Chair And Member Comments Commissioner McCarthy said he has some concerns with the shared space for vehicles, cyclists and pedestrian in the approved 7200/7250 France development plan. Commissioner Kane said he would like to see past and future bike/pedestrian projects on one map. Commissioner Richman said that publishing a map would be very helpful and people like to see that kind of information. IX. Staff Comments • The W 58th St open house was held a few weeks ago; small group meetings are next step in the process. • CloverRide will be launching an additional marketing campaign. • Draft comprehensive plan is out for 30-day public review; Planning Commission public hearing is April 24th. • Director Millner met with board members of Grandview Square to discuss Grandview District Transportation Study. • Planner Scipioni and Traffic Safety Coordinator Bauler attended the Minnesota Transportation Conference, attended seminars on variety of topics. • Council approved the MOU with Lime, waiting to hear schedule for deployment. • Traffic Safety Coordinator Bauler presented the 2018 Traffic Safety Summary Report to Council this week, was well-received. • Spack Consulting will be creating the educational presentation on traffic studies for the ETC. • There will be no Traffic Safety Report in March. • Annual Boards and Commissions Recognition dinner is April 30th at Braemar. X. Schedule of Meeting and Events as of March 1, 2019 For information purposes only, no discussion. XI. Adjournment at 7:23 p.m Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/18/2019 Motion was made by Commissioner Kane and seconded by Commissioner Ruthruff to adjourn the March 21, 2019 meeting. All voted Aye. Motion Carried. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 3 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 33% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 3 100% Kane, Bocar 1 1 2 67% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 2 67% Olson, Larry 1 1 2 67% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 3 100% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 3 100% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 2 67% Veluvali, Shankar 1 RESIGNED 1 33% Emmanual Ayelomi (s) 1 1 33% Yeukai Zimbwa (s) 0 0% Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: C.3. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission March 26, 2019 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the Human Rights & Relations Commission minutes of March 26, 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission March 26, 2019 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/23/2019 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights & Relations Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room, March 26, 2019, 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call: Chair Nelson, Commissioners Arseneault, Edwards, Jones, Meek, and Student Commissioner Waldron Staff Present: MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator; Heidi Lee, Race & Equity Coordinator; and Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Absent: Commissioners Beringer, Epstein, and Kennedy Arrived late: Commissioner Stringer Moore and Student Commissioner Moss-Keys III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the March 26, 2019 meeting agenda, seconded by Commissioner Edwards. Motion carried. Moss-Keys arrived at 7:06 p.m. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the Feb. 26, 2019 meeting minutes, seconded by Commissioner Edwards. Motion carried. Stringer Moore arrived at 7:08 p.m. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Welcome to Race & Equity Coordinator Heidi Lee. a. Community Engagement Coordinator introduced Heidi Lee. b. Lee introduced herself and shared her past experience with St. Paul Public Schools. B. Welcome to new Commissioner Ron Jones. a. Commissioner Jones introduced himself and gave information about his background. b. All Commissioners present introduced themselves to Commissioner Jones and Race & Equity Coordinator Lee. VI. Community Comment—None Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/23/2019 VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2019 Commission Work Plan • Commission reviewed their approved 2019 work plan. • Commission discussed the Bias Offense Initiative. Chair Nelson reviewed the recent bias offense incident (discussed at last month’s meeting) for the benefit of new Commissioner Jones. • Commissioner Arseneault gave an update on the Days of Remembrance event, set for 1 to 2:30 p.m. on April 28. Commission discussed advertising in the Edina Sun Current and Star Tribune, as well as advertising on social media. Commissioners Meek and Stringer Moore will approach newspapers to pitch a story on the event. Student Commissioners Moss-Keys and Waldron will promote the event at Edina High School. Motion by Commissioner Arseneault to authorize $100 in advertising for social media and to authorize the work group to decide if they need advertising in Star Tribune and Sun Current based on newspaper coverage of event. Commissioner Meek seconded. Motion carried. • Commissioner Meek gave update on Sharing Values, Sharing Community event, which is set for Oct. 6. The committee is still discussing topics. • Discussed Public Art initiative. There will be a Public Art meeting from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. April 25 and they would like HRRC Commissioners there. An invite was sent out via email. B. 2019 Chair and Vice Chair Motion by Commissioner Arseneault for Nelson as Chair and Beringer as Vice Chair for another year. Commissioner Stringer-Moore seconded. Motion carried. VIII. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Arseneault showed the posterboards for Days of Remembrance that date back to beginning of the DOR event, and asked the HRRC to consider commissioning new posterboards for next year. Commissioner Arseneault also shared that Hannah Klein, a member of the Arts & Culture Commission and part of the Days of Remembrance work group, is working with an art teacher at the Edina French Immersion School to have the students do an art project around this year’s Days of Remembrance theme. • Commissioner Waldron will work on getting the word out about Days of Remembrance to French students and teachers. • Commissioner Moss-Keyes will also help get word out about Days of Remembrance to French teachers, students. And will share information with U.S. History and World History classes at Edina High School. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/23/2019 IX. Staff Comments • Community Engagement Coordinator Lamon asked Commission members to RSVP to the Boards & Commission Recognition event April 30. X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Arseneault to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Meek. Motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: XII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrea Rich, Financial Analyst Item Activity: Subject:2019 Q1 Finance Quarterly Report Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Information Only. INTRODUCTION: Attached is the 2019 Q1 Financial Report for your review. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2019 Q1 Financial Report 1 Quarterly Financial Report AS OF MARCH 31, 2019 CITY OF EDINA INSIDE THIS ISSUE: General Fund Expenditures by Department ............................................3 Utility Fund Revenues and Expenses ....4 Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses ...5 Parks & Recreation Enterprise Funds ..6 Cost Recovery .............................................9 Investments ...................................................10 Debt ................................................................12 Overview • The first installment of property taxes does not arrive until the second quarter while General Fund expenses are spread evenly at 25% per quarter. • The City’s investments are earning more year-over-year with higher interest rates. • Personal Services in the General Fund are up for: • Expected increases in salary and benefits as well as planned additions in the Police Department and Fire Department, • Increases at Public Works for snow and ice removal, and • Severance payments hitting the Human Resources Department. • Liquor store Q1 sales are flat to prior year (1% down) which is also attributed to the weather. • Parks and Recreation enterprises are gearing up for spring/summer with the sale of golf memberships, Braemar dome reservations and pool season passes. While memberships and dome sales are up, pool season passes are off to a slower start. • Depreciation expense for 2019 will not be booked until the 2018 audit is complete. For purposes of this report, depreciation has been estimated at a quarter of the 2019 budget. • Overall, Q1 is consistent with previous years and is performing as expected. General Fund Revenue and Expenditures • TAXES – Property taxes are the primary revenue source and are received in June and December. • FRANCHISE FEES – Franchise Fees are remitted in the month following quarter end; thus, Q1 will be received in April. • LODGING TAX – Variance is due to timing. For example, January Lodging Tax was received by the City in February, and 95% was paid out to Explore Edina in March. • LICENSES & PERMITS – Decrease versus prior year is due to the number/timing of construction deposits (down $181k) and permits (building and mechanical permits down $181k and $92k, respectively). • CHARGES FOR SERVICES – Decrease is mostly due to ambulance collections. Transition to new ambulance billing service has temporarily delayed collections. • INVESTMENT INCOME – Investment income is recorded in this account throughout the year and allocated out for final financials. Investment income year-over-year is higher due to an increase in rates. • PERSONAL SERVICES – Salary and benefits are right on target at 25% of the annual budget. Variances among the departments are presented in General Fund Expenditures by Department. (Continued on next page) 2 CITY OF EDINA • CONTRACTUAL SERVICES – Increase over prior year is due to Race & Equity Citywide training in 2019 and public safety annual software payment. The Race & Equity Citywide training was new this year as a result of the Race & Equity plan. These drivers in the year-to- date variance are timing and will not impact the full year budget. • UTILITY CONTRIBUTION IN – New in 2018, City facilities are being charged for water/ storm/sewer usage. Expenses appear under Contractual Services and are deducted on this line for a zero impact. 3 CITY OF EDINA General Fund Expenditures by Department • In general, expenses approximate 25% per quarter. • HUMAN RESOURCES – Impacted by the amount of severance (i.e., compensated absences) in any given year. Year-to-date severance expense is $243k. Liability for compensated absences is reserved in the General Fund assigned fund balance. • PUBLIC WORKS – Increase over prior year is mostly in Personal Services (snow and ice removal), $152k higher for Q1 2019 versus Q1 2018. Remainder of the increase is due to Light & Power ($31k) and Salt ($42k). Light & Power is higher in 2019 due to timing of invoices – 2019 contains three months, and 2018 contains only two months. • POLICE – Increase is due to Personal Services as well as Contractual Services. Personal Services is higher due to additional staff in response to growing workloads and requests for services, staff movement (e.g., retirements, replacements) as well as annual salary and benefit increases. Contractual Services is higher due to payment of annual public safety software. • FIRE – Increase due to Personal Services with additional staff, changes in staff, as well as annual salary and benefit increases. • PARKS & RECREATION – Similar to prior year, but behind budget due to higher expenses during summer period for camps/programs. 4 CITY OF EDINA Utility Fund Revenues and Expenses • Water, Sewer and Storm Sewer fees increased 5%, 5% and 15%, respectively in 2019 over 2018. • Water Rec Fee and Sewer Rec Fee are dependent upon the number of new connections. • Disposal Charges is Met Council sewer service. • Non-operating revenues/(expenses) is mostly interest paid on bonds. The budget has offsetting bond discount amortization which is booked annually at year end. 5 CITY OF EDINA Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses • Inventory has increased from $1.7M at year-end 2018 to $2.0M at end of the first quarter 2019. Inventory turns for 2018 were 6.4 compared to an industry average of 6.2. Increase in inventory in Q4/Q1 is due to fiscal year-end buying opportunities and a shift away from value labels in wine. Annualized Q1 inventory turns are 4.4; however, liquor store sales are more heavily weighted toward the back end of the year (21%, 25%, 25% and 28% for Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4, respectively) which will increase turns. • Revenues are flat with a decrease of 6k in customer counts quarter over quarter. Decrease in customers is attributable to the weather (closed early five times this season) as well as change in advertising. Advertising spend has been reserved to launch delivery. While customer counts are down, sales are comparable to 2018 due to spikes leading up to the storms and a focus of staff on ATV (average transaction value) and UPT (Units per Transaction). • Total gross margin is 30% compared to industry average of 26% (2018) and 26.1% for metro area liquor store operations (2017). • Q1 physical inventory adjustment was net $8k (less than .5% of inventory). Braemar Arena and Field • Utilization represents hours scheduled out of total hours available. Prime versus nonprime is dependent upon the time of day and time of year. • Building Rental is favorable due mostly to the Sports Dome ($119k) which represents advance bookings (City Sports Connection, Softball Finder, Tonka United, etc.) made in 2018 and reclassed to 2019 revenue. • Advertising Sales is negative revenue due to termination of contract with our external sales representative. Termination of the contract paid commission on advertising sales that have not yet been collected (two and three year contracts). • Personal Services is less than prior year due to severance payments made in 2018. Braemar Golf Course and Dome • The regulation golf course was closed in 2017 and 2018. Increase in revenue year-over-year is mainly due to the golf dome benefiting from a late spring arrival and anticipation of new course opening May 18th. 6 CITY OF EDINA Parks and Recreation Enterprise Funds 7 CITY OF EDINA Edinborough Park • ASSOCIATION FEE – Decrease in park maintenance fees is due to reduction in payment from Edina Residence Inn for previous overpayment, annual impact of $45k. • LODGING TAX – New in 2018, Edinborough will receive net 5% of Edinborough Residence Inn (remainder goes to Explore Edina), approximate annual impact of $7k. • OTHER RENTAL – For increased visibility, pool revenue was moved to Other Rental in 2018. Decrease year-over-year is due to timing of payments. • PERSONAL SERVICES – Half of year-over-year increase is due to severance payout in 2019. Aquatic Center • Season passes are on sale now. Early-Bird pricing is in effect through April 30th. First quarter sales are down thus far – 290 in Q1 2019 vs 481 Q1 2018. The long winter may be driving slower sales. Centennial Lakes • In 2018, the City collected $80k in back association fees. • Other revenue at Centennial Lakes is dependent upon the weather. Art Center • Previously tracked number of class registrations, but classes differ in length. Class prices are based upon number of instructional hours and price per hour. Going forward, the number of instructional hours will be tracked to better match revenues. CITY OF EDINA 8 CITY OF EDINA 9 Cost Recovery Cost Recovery percentages indicate a facility’s ability to cover operating expenses. In 2018, the City established two cost recovery calculations. The first calculation, Total cost recovery (Total CR) represents all operating revenue/operating expenses. The second calculation, Management cost recovery (Mgmt CR) adjusts the total operating expenses to exclude depreciation, central services, water/storm/sewer. Initial 2018/2019 annual targets have been established based upon three years of historical data. Annual targets will be set with each budgeting cycle as an approximate expectation of annual results. The below represents full year 2018 percentages, first quarter 2019 percentages and annual targets by both the Total CR and Mgmt CR. Differences between quarterly results and annual targets are due to the timing of revenues and expenses. For example, Aquatic Center is selling season passes now, but it has limited expenses, with the exception of depreciation, until open. 10 CITY OF EDINA The City’s investments are held in various accounts: –4M: MN Municipal Money Market Fund sponsored by the League of MN Cities. The City uses this fund to manage bond proceeds to ensure compliance with IRS regulations. Funds from the 2017A, 2017B, and 2018A are included in this account. These bonds were issued to fund road reconstruction projects and the new golf course. As construction continues, the balance in this account will decrease. –HRA Series 2009A Bonds: The City owns the 2019 through 2028 maturities of the $1.52M Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A. –Tradition Capital Bank: A 1-year $243,000 FDIC insured Certificate of Deposit. –US Bank (Sweep): City’s main checking account at US Bank. Funds not required to clear checks is automatically “swept” into a money market account. The balance in this account changes daily based on the amount of checks outstanding. Biweekly payroll is also taken out of this account. –US Bank 2023 (Securian): Securian is the City’s outside investment manager replacing Nuveen in January 2018. They oversee a $20 million portfolio. These securities are held in a custodian account at US Bank. Funds in this account are not needed for cash flow and can be invested in longer maturities. The benchmark for this portfolio is a combination of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Mortgage Backed Securities Index. Allowable investments include U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to (but not including) 10 years and agency mortgage backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA), and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). –US Bank 2023A: This account is managed internally. The City uses a network of four institutional brokers who recommend securities in compliance with our Investment Policy. Funds in this account are managed primarily for cash flow purposes. Investments At the end of the 1st quarter, the City’s investment portfolio totaled $78 million. The portfolio has benefitted from the increase in short term interest rates. One example of this is the earnings rate on the City’s money market which has increased from 0.66% in 2017 to the current rate of 2.31%. This has helped the internally managed portfolio generate total income of $325k, an increase of $126k over prior year Q1. The following is a breakdown of total investments by custodian: The following represents the total investment pool by sector: Following represents the same data buy only for the internally managed piece under custodianship of US Bank: 11 CITY OF EDINA The following are quarterly investment results against a similar benchmark. The internal and external portfolios have different investment strategies. The internal portfolio is intended to remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to manage daily City cash flow as well as debt payments. At the end of Q1 2019, the average days to maturity for the internal portfolio is 680 days (or 23 months), excluding the money market account. Maturities range from one day (money market) to five years. The one year US Treasury bill reflects the future return of the investment compared to the actual return reported for the internal portfolio. While the amounts should trend in the same direction, the internal portfolio is expected to lag behind the benchmark rates. The external portfolio has longer term investment options to optimize return within our investment policy. The external portfolio benchmark of Bloomberg Barclays Intermediate US Government/Mortgage Index, represents an investment pool including U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to (but no including) 10 years and agency mortgage backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA), and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). At the end of Q1 2019, the average days to maturity for the external portfolio is 11.5 years with maturities ranging from July 2019 to August 2048. The later maturities represent mortgage backed securities. Early results have been impacted by the transition from one investment manager to another and from rising interest rates. As shown in recent quarters, returns have improved. Detail reports by investment are available upon request. 12 CITY OF EDINA Debt Below represents the City’s annual debt service requirements to maturity for existing bonds. The 2019 – 2023 Capital Improvement Plan calls for total capital spending of about $143 million, of which debt will account for roughly $70 million. Of that total, $47 million is for utility infrastructure including a new water treatment plant payable from utility revenues and $23 million for street reconstruction projects payable from special assessments assessed to benefitting properties. The term of the bonds range from 10 to 15 years depending on the project. NOTES –Go Bonds: obligations which pledge the full faith and credit of the municipality to their payment. This currently represents refunding bond issues. –Public Project Revenue: represent the 2009A (Public Works facility), 2014A and 2015A HRA bonds –EEEP SA Revenue: 2012 Edina Emerald Energy Program –GO PIR Bonds: used to finance any public improvement that may be specially assessed under Chapter 429; the most common include roads, water improvements and sewer improvements –Revenue Bonds: obligations for which the City promises to pay principal and interest only from a specific revenue source such as utilities and other enterprises (Braemar Golf Course, Aquatic Center, etc.) Date: May 7, 2019 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Council Upcoming Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Summary of upcoming meetings and events for City Council. Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, May 7 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Parks & Recreation and Transportation Commissions Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers T hurs, May 16 7:30 a.m.HRA Regular Meeting Council Chambers Tues, May 21 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Community Health Commission Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Mon, May 27 Legal Holiday – Memorial Day T hurs, May 30 7:30 a.m.HRA Regular Meeting Council Chambers Tues, June 4 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Quality of Life Survey Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers T hurs, June 13 7:30 a.m.HRA Regular Meeting Council Chambers Tues, June 18 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Water Treatment Plant Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers T hurs, June 27 7:30 a.m.HRA Regular Meeting Council Chambers