Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19841119_regular.-. 24 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR EIEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 19, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. MARCELLA DAEHN COMIGNDED. Mr. Rosland commented that Marcella Daehn'started working for the City in January of 1977 as secretary to the City Manager and was appointed as City Clerk in June of 1983. He commended her for her efforts in administering the General/City Election held on November 6, noting that it was an exceptionally challanging election requiring paper ballots in addition to the voting machines. Mr. Rosland added that there is an excellent working relationship between her and all departments of City Hall. her. Members of the Council added their commendation and thanks. I A silver pen bearing the Edina Logo was presented to PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE FROM R-1 TO MD-5 FOR EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 12/3/84. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt to continue the public hearing on the zoning change from R-1 Single Dwelling Unit Dist- rict to MD-5 Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located west of Pork Avenue and south of West 76th Street, to the Council Meeting of December 3, 1984. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH (5051 EDEN AVENUE SO.) Mr. Hughes presented the petition of Our Lady of Grace Church for a Conditional Use Permit, advising that the Church is proposing a 23,650 square foot addition to their existing church building. This addition will house a new sanctuary, a small chapel, meeting rooms and other related facilities. into a gymnasium for use by Our Lady of Grace School. contain pew seating for 848 people and space for overflow seating for an additional 133 peop.le. the balance of the church property. required as a result of the addition. requirements by about 127 spaces which should provide more than adequate parking. The parking expansion shown on the site plan is not proposed as part of this project but may be constructed in the future if needed, Othen than a minor extention and redevelopment of the main entry drive, no other changes to the balance of the site are proposed. side. single family home to the south; existing landscaping effectively screens the pro- posed addition from the homes to the south. Zoning Ordinance requires the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit prior to church expansions. mission on October 31, 1984. the issuance of the permit have been met and recommended approval. Commission heard the proposal they did not review a landscape plan which has since been supplied and been found by staff to meet the Ordinance requirements. Justice, of Hammel, Green, and Abrahamson Architects, was present to answer questions. ET0 objections being heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have-been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Our Lady of Grace Church, at 5151 Eden Avenue, for construction of a 23,650 square foot addition to their existing church building, according to plans submitted, Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. The existing sanctuary will be converted The proposed new sanctuary will Mr. Hughes noted that the proposed addition requires few alterations to No new parking lots are proposed and none are The current parking count exceeds Ordinance 1 The church property is bordered by residential uses only on its south The proposed new sanctuary will be located about 350 feet from the nearest Mr. Hughes pointed out that the new The request was heard by the Community Development and Planning Com- , The Commission found that the findings required for At the time the John RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - -I Rollcall : -Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Abstaining: Bredesen. Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEXRING FOR PmLIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF VICTORSEN'S VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION CONTINUED TO 12/3/84; FINDIEGS TO BE PREPARED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed'on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition of Folke Victorsen for preliminary plat approval of Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition, generally located south of Valley View Road and west of Brookview Avenue. applicant requests a two lot plat of two pre-existing unplatted parcels. The west- erly unplatted parcel has been owned by the proponent for many years, is landlocked and is, therefore, unbuildable. single dwelling unit building fronting on Brookview Avenue. acquired by the applicant. The The easterly unplatted parcel is developed with a This parcel was recently The proposed plat is requested to provide a 20 foot strip 25 across the easterly parcel to provide access for the westerly parcel. a new single dwelling unit is proposed for the westerly lot. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the proposed plat also requires the grant of a subdivision variance. Zoning Ordinance requires that the minimum lot width of 75 feet must be met at a point 50 feet from the front lot line. measured 50 feet from the front lot line is 20 feet. Thus, a 55 foot variance is needed. single parcel of property. to Southdale Center, Inc., thereby creating the westerly landlocked parcel. Staff has been unable to find that the City approved the division caused by this 1956 sale and also cannot determine the reason for Southdale's desire to own the property. Mr. Hughes noted that in 1962, the applicant platted Victorsen's Valley View which adjoins the landlocked parcel to the north. structed an eight unit apartment building on this property. the applicant acquired the landlocked parcel. acquired the easterly parcel which separates the landlocked parcel from Brookview Avenue. proposed new lot is located about 45 feet from the Garrison Lane cul-de-sac. gain access to Garrison Lane, the applicant would need to acquire property from the homeowner to the west.which he has been unable to do. Mr. Hughes advised that both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance have policies and standards which pro- hibit the type of subdivision that is being proposed. this case revolves around the requested variance and the City's determination as to the existence of unique circumstances and undue hardship while recognizing the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. Council should be aware of several points in making this determination: 1) the division which created the westerly landlocked parcel apparently was not approved by the City; 2) the landlocked parcel is not a non-conforming lot", i.e. a lot which complies with our Ordinances when created, but which does not now comply due only to a change in the Ordinance and has always been unbuildable, 3) the randlocked parcel and the easterly parcel have now, in essence, been combined by virture of their present common ownership'into one, con- forming lot, and 4) the landlocked parcel could be accessed better from Garrison Lane as the access would be shorter and would likely result in a more logical orientation of a new building. Mr. Hughes stated that the Development and Planning Commission had reviewed the request at their October 31, 1984 meeting and recommended that the subdivision should be denied. Karlins, Siege1 and Brill, was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Goodman re- viewed the history of Parcel A and presented arguments in support of the requested variance for the necklot: 1) that the Victorsens at the time of the sale of the apartment building to the north in 1970 had no knowledge that the lot division f. created in 1956 when Parcel A was sold to Southdale had not been approved by the City, 2) that both parcels as proposed meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in and of themselves in this R-1 Single Family Dwelling Unit District, 3) that only a single family home is being proposed to be build on Parcel A and 4) that the pro- posed home will not interfere with any surrounding property. Victorsen commented that they had removed many diseased elm trees and have cleaned up the lot in general and that they now were requesting the variance for the plat with the intent of building only a single family home on Parcel A and that their initial plan for a double bungalow has been dropped. the proposed plat and variance were Garth Holmes, 6220 Brookview Avenue, who pre- sented a petition signed by 30 residents of the immediate area on Brookview, and Neal Swant, 4428 Garrison Lane. Arguments in opposition were that approving this variance fo-r a neck lot would set a precedence for other properties, that there is no provision for storing snow from the long access driveway to Parcel A, and that the residents on Brookview Avenue were strongly opposed. There being no further comments, Member Bredesen moved that the staff be directed to prepare Findings, Decision and Reasons in support of the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff for denial of preliminary plat approval and the subdivision variance and to bring back the Findings to the Council at its meeting of December 3, 1984. Motion was seconded by Member Turner, ciimmenting that the Council and staff had spent considerable time discussing neck lots when adopting the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and that there were no unusual circumstances to warrant approval. If approved, The The lot width of Parcel A of the new plat Apparently, the land composing the property in question was originally a The westerly portion of the property was sold in 1956 In the same year, the applicant con- On January 8, 1964, Earlier this year, the applicant He pointed out that the applicant no longer owns the apartment site. The To The principal question in ;; He noted that Tom Goodman, of Grossman, Mr. and Mrs. Folke Speaking in opposition to Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for Final Plat approval for Valley View Heights 2nd Addition, generally located south of Valley View Road, east of Tracy Avenue and adjoining the Crosstown Highway on the south. Council granted preliminary plat approval on July 16, 1984. Mr. Hughes advised that there has been a change between the preliminary plat sub- mitted and the final plat. Both of the plats proposed five single family lots; however, in the preliminary plat there was a small cul-de-sac proposed just off Valley View Road that would provide access to four of the lots. The proposed final 11/19/84 -. 26 plat suggests that there simply be five conventional lots that front onto Valley View Road. He noted that a considerable portion of Lot 5 as well as portions of Lots 3 and 4 would be subject to drainage easements for ponding purposes. staff's viewpoint, it is not considered a significant change from the preliminary plat and would recommend approval, subject to subdivision dedication and a signed developer's agreement. No objections being heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to execution of a developer's agreement and subdivision dedication to the City in the amount of $8,000.00: From RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Valley View Heights 2nd Addition", platted by Kent P. Swanson and Sharon J. Swanson, husband and wife, and Paul C. Kingbay and Carol E. Kingbay, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 19, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution vas seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney 7/1/85 Council Minutes.) I (See revised resolution in Resolution adopted. %.n. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR SVANOE ADDITION (SVANOE REPLAT). Mr. Hughes presented the petition for Final Plat approval for Svanoe Addition, generally located south of West 70th Street and east of Lanham Lane. The proposed plat received preliminary approval from the Council on December 19, 1983. A condition to that approval was that the owner execute and deliver to the City a declaration of restrictive cove- nants prohibiting construction of any house, porch or deck, on that part of the Westerly lot of Carolane Addition lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 124 feet Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of the lot. Mr. Hughes advised that the declaration has been prepared, approved by the City Attorney and signed by the owners of the property and staff would recommend final approval, subject to subdivision dedication. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to subdivision dedication in the amount of $2,000.00 to the City: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR SVANOE ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Svanoe Addition", platted by Tkilliam R. Svanoe and Myrtle A. Svanoe, husband and wife, owners and proprietors and Richfield Bank and Trust'Company, .a Minnesota corporation, mortgagee, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 19, 1984, be and is-hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. I Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Abstaining: Schmidt Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR SIX FULL-SIZED SEDANS FOR POLICE USAGE. Mr. Rosland presented tabu- lation of bids for six full-sized sedans for police usage showing Suburban Chevrolet at'$10,831.00 per vehicle, total of $64,986.00, Thane-Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $10,886.00 per vehicle, total of $65,316.00, and Brookdale Ford at $10,967.75 per vehicle, total of $65,806.50. for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Suburban Chevrolet, for $64,986.00. ; Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COPMITTEE MINUTES OF 11/13/84 APPROVED. No comment being heard, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minute? of November 13, 1984: I) That additional curve and advisory speed signs be erected on Gleason Road near and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Scotia Drive, Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR HOLIDAY STATION STORE AT 50TH STREET & INTERLACHEN. Mr. Rosland advised that an application has been received for an Off-sale Beer License for the Holiday Station Store at 14. 50th Street and Interlachen Boulevard. application has been approved by the*Police Department and Coucil approval is recom- mended. No comments being heard, Member Bredesen moved approval of an Off-sale Beer License for the Holiday Station Store at 5200 Interlachen Boulevard. seconded by Member Turner. The Motion was Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 11/19/84 27 BOARD OF REVIEW TO MEET ON MAY 13, 1985. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Richards setting May 13, 1985 at 5:OO p.m. as the date for the Board of Review to hear all persons considering themselves aggrieved by their assessment. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. COMMISSIONER-ELECT JOHN KEEFE INTRODUCED TO COUNCIL. John Keefe', County Commissioner- Elect for the Third District, introduced himself to the Council Members, assuring them that he would continue the fine representation of Edina on the Board that Commissioner Kremer had given. promised that he would in the same manner convey anything he felt would affect the City of Edina to the Council. He offered to meet with the Council periodically to discuss the mutual concerns and problems that may confront the City. suggested that Commissioner Keefe continue to meet with the City Manager as his predecessor had done. No action was taken. He asked that Council Members convey any concerns to him and Mayor Courtney 1985 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE FOR CITY EPPLOYEES APPROVED. schedule of 1985 Holidays for City employees and commented that there is no change from previous years. the following schedule of holidays for 1985: Mr. Rosland presented a proposed . Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt approving New Year's Day (January 1) Veterans' Day (November 11) Presidents' Day (February 18) Thanksgiving Day (November 28) Good Friday (April 5) Friday after Thanksgiving Day (November 29) Memorial Day (May 27) Christmas Eve Day (December 24-% day) Independence Day (July 4) . Christmas Day (December 25) Labor Day (September 2) New Year's Eve Day (December 31-% day) Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AMM GENERAL MEETING DATE NOTED. the Association of,Metropolitan Municipalities would be held on Thursday, December 6, 1984, at Richfield City Hall, starting at 7:30 p.m. and that all Council Members are invited to attend. He stated that Mr. Rosland and he would be attending the meeting. Mr. Rosland called Council's attention to the proposed Legislative Policies of the AMM which had been included in the Council packets and asked that the Council Members let him know if they differed with the AM4 policies on the various issues so that the Council's position could be presented. Mayor Courtney advised that the General Meeting of No action was taken. rl 0 00 c') m a METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROPOSED HOUSING CHAPTER DISCUSSED. Member Turner advised that the Metropolitan Council has drafted a revision of their Housing Chapter and that she had asked Mr. Hughes to summarize the document. Mr. Hughes advised that a hearing will be held by the Metropolitan Council on November 29, 1984, to determine if the Housing Chapter should be adopted. the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities's (AMM) recommendationg regarding the revised Housing Chapter of the Metropolitan Council as follows : 1) Community Index - Should be used only as a planning tool, not a regulatory tool. 2; .LPfe:.Cycle Housing - Should be viewed on a regional basis, not a community basis. 3) Resonsibility for Subsidized Housing - Fund should not be the obligation of the . cities. 4) Influences of Market Place on Housing - Metro Council should recognize and discuss the role of the market place over which cities have little control. 5). Local Plan Monitoring - Metro Council should not be an overseer of the implementa- tion of local comprehensive plans. Mr. Hughes noted that the Housing Chapter also contains a proposed Legislative Agenda for the coming year on the issues of taxation, preservation of existing housing, .special needs, housing revenue bonds, landlord/tenant relations and local initiatives. He recommended that the City should appear at the hearing on November 29 to testify as follows: 1) That the AMM's recommendations should be endorsed, 2) that the Community Index is a good planning tool but should not be implemented as a regulatory tool, and 3) that the proposed Legislative Agenda is premature and should not be pursued by the Metropolitan Council. Bredesen that the City of Edina appear at the Metro Council hearing on November 29 and testify as recommended by staff. He presented graphics and gave an overview of Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. MLC JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT RATIFIED. Legislative Commission has asked each city council to ratify an amendment to the Joint Powers agreement which authorizes an increase in the financial contributions to the Commission. Member Schmidt moved the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby ratifies the following amendment to the Municipal Legislative Commission's Joint Powers agreement: Mr. Rosland advised that the Municipal RESOLUTION 11/ 19 I84 .. -- "XI. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 2. shall be per capita. annually determined by the Commission not to exceed $0.35 per capita by February 15, of each year based on the most recent Metropolitan Council population estimates, however, no individual municipality shall contribute more than $14,000 per year, This amount may be used by the Commission to pay all legal and consultant costs and expenses and other expenses as approved by the Board. in the per capita charge for all members upon majority vote." Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. The financial contributions of the Parties in support of the Commission Each of the Parties shall pay to the Commission an amount as The Board may authorize changes Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. CITY HALL SPACENEEDS TO BE STUDIED. Member Richards advised that in response to the Council's request that Member Turner and he coordinate a study of City Hall space needs, they have prepared a questionnaire to be completed by all City Departments to solicit background information regarding present accomodations, whether they need to be upgraded, expanded, contracted, consolidated with other governmental functions, whether city, school, state, etc. Mr. Rosland stated he had asked the staff to look at their space needs and they would respond-to the question- naire. naire is brought back to the Council that the next step would to proceed with appointment of a committee. with the questionnaire, asking that responses by completed and returned by no later than December 31, 1984. Member Turner added that when the information obtained from the question- It was unanimously agreed by the Council to proceed RESIGNATION FROM SHHSC NOTED. one of the appointees to the South Hennepin Human Services Council has resigned leaving an opening on that board for her unexpired term to 2-1-85. would like to fill the vacancy as soon as possible and after discnssian,ig>was agreed that the Council Nembers should submit names for consideration to the Mayor so that the position could be filled as soon as possible. Member Turner mentioned that Sally Tang also sat on the Hennepin County Cornunity Health Services Committee. Member Schmidt advised that Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Edina Advisory Board of Health, has applied for that position, being nominated by the Third District Nursing Association and would be excellent for that committee. Mr. Rosland stated he would contact Commissioner Kremer or Commissioner-Elect Keefe and ask them to support the nomination. Member Turner informed the Council that Sally Tang, The board -_ I SEMINAR FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS ON DEALING WITH METROPOLITAN AGENCIES NOTED. Mayor Courtney.stated he received an announcement of a seminar to be conducted by Gene Franchett, former Executive Director of the Metro Council, on "How to Deal With Metropolitan Agencies." Anyone interested should contact the City Manager. No action was taken. WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE HEARING PROCESS OUTLINED. Mr. Rosland informed the Council that the consultants on the Wooddale School site have proposed several alternatives for the site. Recommended procedure would be to hold two informational meetings at Wooddale School approximately a week apart (January 8 and January 15) at which the consultants would present their report and recommendations to area residents and other interested persons. the Council Agenda at the Council Meeting of February 4, 1985. meetings would be advertised and letters would be sent to area residents informing them of the dates and advising that the.meetings are not public hearings. notice would then be given for the public hearing. Street. ing process as outlined by Mr. Rosland. WINE REFERENDUM/LICENSING DISCUSSED. As a follow-up to the recent:advisory poll.- on the issue of wine licenses at the November 6, 1984, General Election, Mr. Rosland asked for.direction by the Council as to what the staff should do in anticipation of a request that the issue of Wine Licenses be placed on the Council Agenda. Member Richards responded that in light of the poll results he felt a draft ordinance should be prepared which would include all the possibilities of how to regulate wine lic- censes, control measures, possible locations involved, etc. Attorney Erickson pointed out that another aspect to consider would be the license fee in relationship to the fee for liquor licenses at the.City's country clubs. local ordinance can be more restrictive than the State Statute. Member Bredesen submitted that he felt any costs involved should be borne by the people who will benefit from the issuance of wine licenses. Mr. Rosland stated that staff will keep track of the costs incurred by staff and counsel. .- A public hearing then would be scheduled for' The informational Required Recommended area to be notified 44th Street to IJ. 54th would be from Halifax Avenue to Highway 100 and from W. -, After discussion, the Council informally agreed to proceed with the hear- I He noted also that a No formal action was taken. 11/ 19 / 84 29 REPORT GIVEN ON APPEAL TO STATE OF MINNESOTA REGARDING COUNTY'S INCREASE IN ASSESSED EVALUATIONS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN EDINA. Mr. Rosland stated that an order has been received from the Minnesota Department of Revenue in response to the City's appeal regarding the 3% increase set by Hennepin County on evaluations of single family homes. Assessor Johnson pointed out that, subsequently, ratios have come out for all mun5cipalities in Hennepin County and it appears that Edina is lowest in the County after the 3% increase. He explained that this community and a few others are the only ones experiencing any overall growth in value. The order stated that the request for a lower evaluation is denied. No action was taken. MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES NET INCOME REVIEWED. chandising approach the City has been working toward has started to pay dividends and that the net income is up $58,510.00 in the first nine months. Mr. Rosland advised that the mer- No action taken. STAFF WISHES COUNCIL A HAPPY THANKSGIVING. Mr. Rosland extended the wishes of the staff to the Council Members for a Happy Thanksgiving Holiday. ORDINANCE NO. 1353-A1 (MASSAGE/SAUNA ORDINANCE) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Council was reminded that First Reading of Ordinance No. 1353-A1 was given at the meeting of November 5, 1985. and adoption of the ordinance as follows: NO objections being heard, Member Schmidt moved Second Reading ORDINANCE NO. 1353-A1 AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS, REDUCING CLUBS AND SALONS, MASSAGE PARLORS, SAUNA PARLORS, AND ESCORT SERVICES, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN BUSINESSES FROM THE REQUIREEENT TO OBTAIN A LICENSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 1353 is hereby amended by adding thereto a new paragraph (c) as follows : "(c) The preceding provisions of this section notwithstanding, no business as described in this section shall be required to obtain a license under this section if it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by affidavits and other documents, including that set out at 4. below, submitted to and in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the City Clerk: Section 1. Exemption from Business License Requirements. Section 2 of 1. 2. 3. The principal activity of the business shall not be the performance of massage services; The activity of the business is conducted and performed on the business premises ; No more than two persons licensed to perform massage services under this ordinance shall perform such massage services at any one time on the business premises; and 4. The annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage services is less than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown by financial statements of the kind specified in Section 4 (a) 10 of this ordinance. '' Sec. 2. There is hereby added to paragraph (a) of Section 4, a new subpara- "lo. A financial statement, certified as true and correct by an independent accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be licensed for the then last three fiscal years of such business, or shorter period of time that applicant may have been in the business to be l-icensed, itemized as to each activity of the business, including without limitation, the gross income from performing massage services." graph 10 as follows: Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : City Clerk U d LIQUOR FUND REPORTS as of August 31, 1984 and September 30, 1984, were presented, reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 11/19/84 CLAIMS PAID. mation of payment of the following claims dated 10/31/84: Park Fund $1,321.99, Art Center $254.67, Swimming Pool Fund $10,819.42, Golf Course Fund 7,404.60, Recreation Center Fund $2,506.95, Gun Range Fund $235.64, Waterwork Fund $3,909.21, Sewer Rental Fund $160.99, Liquor Dispensary Fund $281,659.21, DIP Bond Redemption #2 $606.00, Total $286.907.42; and for payment of the following claims as per Pre-List dated 11/19/84: General Fund $155,781.50, Park Fund $21,560.74, Art Center $8,838.65, Swimming Pool Fund $6,801.75, Golf Course Fund $5,460.17, Recreation Center Fund $8,041.60, Gun Range Fund $466.52, Waterwork Fund $22,239.96, Sewer Rental Fund $3,998.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $95,901.19, Construction Fund $61,570.40, IW Bond Redemption #2 $3,433.09, Total $394,094.52. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Motion of Member Turner, was seconded by Member Schmidt for confir- General Fund $178,028.54, I There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. AflA%. u City Clerk