Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19850603_regular112 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 3, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Turner and Xayor Courtney. FIN& PLAT APPROVED FOR VERNON WOODS 2ND ADDITION. the petition for final plat approval for Vernon Woods 2nd Addition, generally located on Vernon Avenue just north of County Road No. 62. At its meeting of February 25, 1985, the Council had given approval for a revision of the plat showing the elimination of the proposed tennis court on the southerly portion of the town- house site and the relocation of the westerly two townhouses further south. Staff would recommend that final plat approval be granted. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Planner Craig Larsen presented . I No objections being heard, RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR VERNON WOODS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Vernon Woods 2nd Addition", platted by Vernon Woods Invest- ments, Inc., a Minnesota General Partnership, Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota Corporation, and Vernon Woods Homeowners Association, a Minnesota Non- profit Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 3, 1985, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOX WILLIAM C. HANSEN ADDITION. Planner Larsen advised that the subject property is located at the southeast corner of Johnson Drive and Grove Street. Preliminary plat approval was given by the Council on April 15, 1985, subdividing the property to build one new buildable lot. The proponent has now presented the final plat for approval and is in the process of satisfying the condi- tions imposed by the preliminary approval which are: 1) relocating the existing utilities to a new easement on the westerly portion of the property, 2) relocating the driveway so that the existing house would access from Johnson Drive. recommend final plat approval be given, subject to subdivision dedication. objections being heard, Member Richards moved final plat approval, subject to a sub- division dedication fee of $1,600.00 and introduced the following resolution: Staff would No RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR WILLIAM C. HANSEN ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "William C. Hansen Addition", platted by William C. Hansen and Patricia G. Hansen, husband and wife, and Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 3, 1985, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Richards setting June 17, 1985, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) 2) 3) Zoning Change - Second Reading - R-1 to PRD-3 for Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road Preliminary .Plae- - Foster Green Addition Appeal from Board of Appeals & Adjustments Decision - 4528 Bruce Avenue - Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried.. I COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS FOR FRANCE AVENTJE XMPROVEMENT APPROVED. Engineer Hoffman recalled that on January 7, 1985, the Council had approved a prelimi- nary plan and variance request for the proposed France Avenue Improvement Project which is a cooperative project involving MNDot, Hennepin County and the cities of Minneapolis, St. Louis and Edina. It prcposes the reconstruction of France Avenue from W. 49% Street to Excelsior Boulevard with the City of Minneapolis responsible for the administration of the project. It is now requested that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing execution of a cooperative agreement with Minneapolis for preliminary engineering and design for the project. Member Kelly as to how the proposed project would affect the homes on Meadow Ridge and other homes close to the street, Mr. Hoffman said there would be no effect as the street will be moved approximately one foot .to the east. issue, the Council will make that decision later in the year when the final design comes back for final hearing. y In response to question of Regarding the sidewalk Member Richards asked about the funding of Edina's ti 6/3/85 173 share of the project. State Aid funds and special assessment to benefited property owners. There being no further comment, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BE MADE WITH THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN OF Mr. Hoffman explained that it could be funded either with FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH FROM EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD TO WEST 49% STREET WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on January 7, 1985, and the Council authorized the reconstruction of France Avenue; and WHEREAS, Minneapolis has jurisdiction over the entire east half of the roadway and has taken the lead role in the administration of the project; and WHEREAS, a variance has been granted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to construct France Avenue in accordance with the preliminary plan approved by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized and directed to execute an agreement with the City of Minneapolis to provide for payment by the City of Edina to the City of Minneapolis for the City of Edina's share of the cost for preliminary engi- neering design work of France Avenue South from Excelsior Boulevard to West 49% Street. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. REQUEST FROM ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GRANT FROM CITY DISCUSSED. referred to a letter received from the Animal Humane Society, asking for a grant in the amount of $685.00 from the City of Edina per Minnesota State Statute 343.11. During 1984 the Animal Humane Society received approximately 274 unwanted pets from the City of Edina. The Police Department would recommend approval of the requested grant based on the fact that the removal of those animals from the City has reduced the number of calls made to our Animal Control Officer, and further that the Society does not charge for dropping off dead animals. stated that before responding to the request he would like to have more infor- mation as to where the other contributions to the Society come from. Turner commented that she would support the contribution but that we should get more information to justify it. No formal action was taken. Mr. Rosland Member Richards Member PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE LMC CONSTITUTION DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland called the Council's attention to the proposed amendments to the League of Minnesota Cities Constitution for consideration at the annual meeting on June 13, during the LMC 1985 Annual Conference. The most important of the amendments involves the dues structure and a three-year schedule is recommended involving a 7.5 percent increase for 1986 and a six percent increase for 1987 and 1988. would be the minimum necessary funding for the League to maintain the quality and quantity of services which the membership desires and expects. pointed out that the City's dues would increase approximately $2,000 per year. Member Richards commented that he is concerned that the League benefits the large and the small city and that it does not seek alternative funding such as user's fees. at the.annua1 meeting on June 13 and that these points should be made: 1) that user fees should be considered, 2) that regional meeting costs should be covered entirely by user fees, and 3) that the League should ,try.,to.keep the dues increase at 5 percent. the City Manager would bring those points before the annual meeting for discussion. No formal action was taken. These increases Mr. Rosland Member Turner suggested that the proposed fees increase should be discussed Mayor Courtney agreed with the comments made and said either he or EDINA COMMIJNITY CENTER FIVE YEAR PLAN DISCUSSED. Member Turner advised that the Community Center Advisory Board presented their report on the Edina Community Center Five Year Plan to the School Board recently. That study was commissioned by the School Board. Member Turner suggested that the Board present that report to the Council, with the understanding that the School Board has not yet taken specific action on implementation, because it does have implications for the City. It was informally agreed that Member Turner would contact the Board and as to a convenient time for the matter to be placed on the Council's agenda. WOODDALE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMITTEE REGARDING WOODDALE PARK DISCUSSED. Member Turner asked if a Wooddale neighborhood committee to work on the planning of Wooddale Park has been implemented. has had one meeting, .with a second meeting scheduled for June 19 with Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, to.give input on the park plan and that all neighbors contiguous to the Wooddale park property have been invited to attend. No action was taken. Mr. Rosland replied that.a committee has been formed and . 6/3/85 ZONING CHANGE FROM R-1 TO R-2 DISTRICT FOR VACANT LOT AT 425 WASHINGTON AVENUE TO BE REHEARD; HEARING DATE SET FOR 7/15/85. request for zoning change from R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2 Double Dwelling Unit District for the vacant lot at 425 Washington Avenue was heard by the Council on May 20, 1985 and First Reading failed to pass, he has reconsidered the request upon visiting the site and viewing the four existing doubles which are zoned R-2 and the two legal, non-conforming doubles on Washington Avenue as had been pointed‘ out by the staff report. like to request a rehearing on this matter. the Council rehear the request for zoning change from R-1 to R-2 District for the lot at 425 Washington Avenue. Turner. Mayor Courtney commented that since the He added that he has come to the conclusion that he would Mayor Courtney then made a motion that I Motion to rehear the request was seconded by Member Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards - Member Kelly then moved to sei July 15, 1985 as hearing date for the request for zoning change from R-1 to R-2 District for the lot at 425 Washington Avenue. was seconded by Member Turner. Motion Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays : Richards Motion carried. OPENINGS IN STATE AGENCIES NOTED. Cities has sent a notice of various openings in State agencies and that he would have the list sent to the Council Members so that they could indicate any interest they may have. No action was taken. Mr. Rosland advised that the League of Minnesota LETTER DISCUSSED REGARDING 4008 SUNNYSIDE ROAD RENTAL HOUSE. Mr. Rosland referred to a letter he had received from concerned neighbors on the 4000 Sunnyside Road block in regard to their concerns about an unpleasant and unsafe situation created by tenants at 4008 Sunnyside Road. night, excessive vehicles parked on the street, number of individuals living there, liquor consumption by minors, fire hazard, dog barking and running loose, and safety for the ten children under 10 years of age who live in the block. advised that the following action has begun: 1) activities at subject house will be monitored closely by the Police Department, 2) letter’will be sent to owner of the house, and 3) neighbors will be asked to keep staff posted as to any actions that can help to resolve the problem. . Their concerns included loud parties late at . Mr. Rosland No Council action was taken. 100% PETITION FOR W. 59TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Mr. Rosland advised that a 100% petition for reconstruction of W. 59th Street between Wooddale Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue has been received and that the petitioners have asked that the cost be assessed against their properties. Motion of Member - Kelly was seconded by Member Turner to refer the petition to the Engineering Depart- ment for processing. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-8 (WEST 70TH STREET AT CORNELIA DRIVE). staff, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: As recommended by 1- RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-8 1. the feasibility of the proposed Traffic Control Signal System described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improve- ment, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. Tiis Council shall’meet on Monday, June 17, 1985, at 7:OO p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvement. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be publiched in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to I (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 .. 4. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-8 , S .A.P. 120-145-15 6/3/85 115 d 0 m 5 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 17, 1985, at 7:OO P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be con- structed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: The WEST 70TH STREET AT CORNELIA DRIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-8 S .A.P. 120-145-15 $70,000.00 The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of proposed improve- ments includes all properties with the South & of Sec. 30, T. 28, R..24 .and-the North k of Sec. 31, T. 28, R. 24. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly, ESTIMATED COST Marcella Daehn, City Clerk Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 812-A2 (REGULATING RADIO AND TELEVISION ANTENNAS, DISH ANTENNAS, AND TO-WERS) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that the Council had discussed Ordinance No. 812-A2 at its last meeting with regard to setback require- ments for dish antennas in particular, and had continued the matter to this meeting to permit drafting of an ordinance that would place a moratorium on antennas, dish antennas .and towers.through October 2, 1985. The draft ordinance has been prepared; however, staff would recommend that the moratorium ordinance not be adopted. Mr. Rosland then presented alternative ways of con- trolling the location of antennas as outlined by the Planning Department staff memorandum dated May 30, 1985, as follows: 1) require that antennas, towers, and dish antennas maintain the same minimum setbacks required for accessory buildings or structures - R-1 District - 15 ft side street, 5 ft interior sideyard, 5 ft rear yard, 2) require that they maintain the same minimum setbacks required for principal buildings - 15 ft side street, 5 ft interior sideyard (less than 75 ft lot width) 10 feet (all others), 25 ft rear yard, 3) in addition to minimun setbacks, the City could also control'location of antennas relative to adjacent dwellings - a) no part of any antenna, tower, or dish antenna shall be closer than 25 feet to any part of the principal structure on any adjacent lot, or b) no part shaU be closer than 25 feet to the allowed buildable area for a principal structure on any adjacent lot, or c) IN NO instance shall any antenna, tower, or dish antenna be located closer to a principal structure on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal structure on the lot where it is located. Member Richards commented that he could-support the ordinance with the alternative location No. 2 as stated coupled with the requirement No. 3(c), with the understanding the issues of dish antennas and other similar types of accessory uses of personal property and their location (e.g. recreational vehicles, boats, etc.) will be studied by staff, be reviewed by the Planning Commission and a report brought back to the Council. Member Kelly indicated that she wou'ld prefer alternative No. 1 and No. 3. Member Turner commented that she still believes that alterna- tive.No. 1 is the best location for antennas, but that it is important that-we have an ordinance in place to deal with the numerous requests for dish antennas. Further, that after the study it would be easier to amend the ordinance to make it less festrictive than to make it more restrictive. that as part of the study we take into consideration Federal regulations regard- ing dish-antennas. Ordinance No. 812-A2 for Second Reading, with alternative No. 2 and requirement 3(c), as follows: Member Turner suggested There being no further discussion, Member Richards offered ORDINANCE NO. 812-A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 812 TO REGULATE -. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATION, TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNAS, EXTERIOR DISH ANTENNAS AND SUPPORTING TOWFRS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section of of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 1. Definitions. Words and phrases used in this ordinance which are defined in Ordinance No. 825, as amended from time to time, (said ordinance, as amended from time to time, is herein called the "Zoning Or.dinance"), shall be construed herein according to their definitions contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The following words and terms shall have the following meanings in ~ this ordinance: (a) Antenna: equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the'exterior of, or outsdde of, any building or structure, and includes a dish antenna. apparatus) which is'used for receiving telecommunication, television or radio (b) Dish Antenna: a parabolic shaped antenna (including all supporting 6/3/85 signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any building or structure. an antenna is attached, or which is designed for an antenna to be attached, and all supporting lines, cables, wires and braces." Sec. 2. Sec. 2 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2. Permit Required; Exemptions. No antenna or tower of any kind shall hereafter be erected, constructed or paced, or re-erected, reconstructed or replaced, anywhere within the City without first making an application for and obtaining from the City a permit therefor. (c) Tower: any pole, spire or structure, or any combination thereof, to which I (a) Exemptions. No permit shall be required for the following: (i) in cross sectional area, which do not exceed six feet in height. (ii) (iii) Dish antennas not greater than 30 inches in diameter or five square feet All other towers or antennas which do not exceed six feet in height. Antennas and towers erected or constructed by the City for City purposes." Sec. 3. Sec. 3 or Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended ro read as follows: "Sec. 3. Application for Permit; Issuance; Fees. Application for a permit required by this Ordinance shall be made to the Building Official in the same manner, and containing the same information, as for a building permit pursuant to Ordinance No. 406, as amended from time to time, and the Minnesota State Building Code thereby adopted. For a permit required by this ordinance, an application fee as set forth in Ordinance No. 171 shall be required for the purpose of defraying the cost of examining and processing the application for permit and the cost of inspecting the installation and maintenance of such antennas, dish antennas and towers." Such permit shall be issued by the Building Official. Sec. 4. .Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby divided into three sections, being Sec. 4, 5, and 6, and is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 4. General Requirements. All antennas, towers and dish antennas, including supporting wires, for which a permit is required shall comply with the following requirements: requirements set forth in the Minnesota Building Code thereby adopted, as such ordinance shall be amended from time to time. strike by lightning and shall comply, as to electrical wiring and connections, with all applicable City and state statutes, regulations and standards. base of the antenna and tower to the nearest overhead electrical power line (except individual service drops), less five feet. zed persons. reflectors, flashers or other illuminating device, or any signs, banners or placards of any kind, except one sign not over 10 square inches indicating the name of the manufacturer and/or installer. zny piatform, catwalk, Crow's nest or similar structure. corrosive-resistant, non-combustible materials. or made of wood, including timbers'and logs. No part of any antenna or tower, nor any lines, cables, equipment, wires or braces used in connection with any tower or antenna shall, at any time, extend across or over any part of a street, sidewalk or alley." (a) All applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 406, including wind loading (b) Antennas and towers shall be grounded for protection against a direct (c) No antenna or tower shall exceed a height equal to the distance from the (d) (e) Antennas or towers shall be protected to discourage climbing by unauthori- No antenna or tower shall have affixed to it in any way any lights, .-\ (a; No tower shall have constructed thereon, or attached thereto, in any way, (g) All towers shall be constructed of corrosive-resistant steel or other Towers shall not be constructed -(h) .. :!$ec, 5 : Location. (a) In all Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: (i) tained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, within any setback required by the Zoning Ordinancd for a principal building or structure for the Zoning District in which the antenna or tower is located. Additional requirements for lots in the R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts as No part of any tower or mtenna shall be constructed, located or main- (b) established by the Zoning Ordinance other than lots developed with a conditional use : (i) the roof of a principal or accessory building. (Ti) (iii) (iv) maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, closer to the allowed buildable area on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building or structure on the lot on which it is located." Dish antennas greater than 30 inches in diameter shall not be located on Dish antennas shall only be located in rear yards. No antennas or towers shall be located in the front .yard. No antenna, tower, or dish antenna shall be constructed, located or "Sec. 6. Height Restrictions. (a) In the R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts as established (i) No ground mounted tower shall be in excess of 50 gram the ground elevation at the base of the tower to + tower. by the Zoning Ordinance: feet in height, measured the highest point of the * 6/3/85 (ii) Towers mounted on a building or structure shall not extend over 25 feet above the highest.point of the roof of the building or structure. (iii) Antennas shall not extend more than 15 feet above the highest point of a tower. Antennas not mounted on a tower shall not be in excess of 15 feet high, measured from the highest point of the roof of the building to which the antenna is attached to the highest point of the antenna, or from the ground elevation at the base of the antenna to the highest point of the antenna. from the ground elevation at the base of the antenna to the highest point of the antenna. Dish antennas not greater than 30 inches in diameter, which may be mounted on the roof pursuant to this ordinance, shall not exceed six feet in height, measured from the point at which the antenna is amounted to the roof to the highest point of the antenna. ' (iv) Dish antennas shall not be in excess of 15 feet in height, measured (v) (b) In all other Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: in height, measured from the base of the tower or antenna, whichever is lower, to the highest point of the antenna or tower, whichever is higher. for either a ground mount or roof mount." Sec. 5. Sec. 5 (Existing Antennas and Towers; Continued Use; Replacement) of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 7. Sec. 6. Sec. 6 (Lights and Signs; Crows' Nests) or Ordinance No. 812 is hereby deleted in its entirety. Sec. 7. Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 8 and is amended to read as follows: (i) No antenna, no tower and no tower with an antenna shall exceed 75 feet (ii) Dish antennas shall have an overall height of no more than 26 feet ri c'l 5 00 m "Sec. 8. Number of Towers and Antennas Allowed. . no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a permit under the provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any one time on any single lot. that one exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a permit under the provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any one time on any single tract. In all Districts zoned other than residential by the Zoning Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one tower over 20 feet in height, and two dish antennas shall be allowed at any one time on any single tract." (a) In the R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: (b) In other Districts zoned residential by the Zoning Ordinance: no more (c) Sec. 8. Sec. 8 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumber Sec. 9 and is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 9. Variances. Variances from the literal provisions of this ordinance shall be processed and granted or denied in the same manner as variances are handled under Ordinance No. 825." Sec. 9. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumber Sec. 10 and is amended to redd as follows: "Sec. 10. . is not used for six successive months, commencing after the effective date of this ordinance, shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed in the same manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for dangerous or unsafe-buildings established by Ordinance No. 471 or by Ordinance No. 406, as such ordinances are amended from time to time, or by the Building Codes adopted by Ordhance No. 406, as amended, or by Minnesota Stautes, Sections 463.15 to 463.26, as amended." Sec. 10. Sec. 10 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 11 and is amended to read as follows: Abandoned Antennas and Towers; Removal. Any antenna or tower which "Sec. 11. Violation; Penalty. shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to Ordinance NO. 175 , as amended. as amended, the City may exerci'se, with or separately from such penalties, all and any other legal and equitable remedies then available to the City by this ordinance, or by statute, or other ordinances of the City, or by applicable rules or regulations, to enforce this ordinance, including, withput limitation, injunction. shall be jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the City in enforcing this ordinance against such persons, including, without limitation, attorneys fees , witness fees and administrative expenses , with interest on such fees and expenses from the dates incurred until paid at the highest rate then allowed by law, and if no maximum rate be established by law, then at twelve (10%) percent per annum, and shall also be jointly and severally liable (a) Misdemeanor. Any person who shall violate any provision of this ordinance (b) Other Remedies. In addition to the penalties imposed by Ordinance No. 175, (c) Costs of Enforcement. The person or persons violating this ordinance .- . 6/3/85 -- I78 for all costs, including attorneys' fees, of collecting such fees, expenses and interest, with interest on such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same rate as is payable on such fees and expenses." Sec. 11. No. 812 are hereby renumbered Sec. 12 and Sec. 13, respectively. Sec. 12. passage and publication. Motion was for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Sec. 11 (Partial Invalidity) and Sec. 12 (Interpretation) of Ordinance This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: 7fi4 5% & City Clerk CLAIMS PAID. the following claims dated 6/1/85: Golf Course Fund $22,477.06, Recreation Center Fund $3,408.16, Gun Range Fund $427.50, Water Fund $8,135.08, Utility Fund $26,980.94, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,222.50, Construction Fund $1,726.41, Total $125,255.46. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for payment of General Fund $54,570.29, Art Center $6,307.52, Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. *&%-a City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 17, 1985 .5:00 P.M. In-attendance were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. CITY'S STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEWED. was scheduled so that the Council could review the City's Strategic Plan which had been developed in 1984. changes were suggested. Key Issues were reviewed and discussed. were the Goals and Long-term Objectives that had been developed. Council looked at the Short-Term Objectives. After considerable discussion, it was agreed that the following should be the Short-Term Objectives for the remainder of 1985: 1) Faramedic Services, 2) Capital Plan, and 3) Upgrading of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Rosland stated that this special meeting ' The Mission Statement was reviewed and no Also reviewed Lastly, the Because the purpose of this special meeting was to review and discuss the Strategic Plan, no formal action was taken. The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. ! %4%. &L- City Clerk