HomeMy WebLinkAbout19850715_regularMINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 15, 1985
197
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
MINUTES of the Regular and Special Meetings of June 17, 1985 were approved as
submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 825-A5 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING; PRD-3 ZONING APPROVED FOR FOSTER
GREEN ADDITION (BRUTGER COMPANIES). Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the subject
property is located west of Cahill Road and.south of Dewey Hill Road.
June 17, 1985 meeting, the Council had heard the request for final rezoning and
preliminary plat approval and had referred the matter back to the staff and the
Community Development and Planning Commission to consider changes to the landscap-
ing plan so that it would be consistent with adjoining properties and to allow an
opportunity for the residents of the adjoining condominiums to comment on the plan.
Brutger representative Steve Wilson met with members of Windwood Condominiums and
Dewey Hill Condominiums on Monday, June 24, 1985. At the Planning Commission
meeting on June 26, 1985 the developer presented a revised landscape plan. Also
submitted at that meeting were petitions from residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums
in opposition to the proposed development.
a letter from the president of Windwood Condominiums Association approving the
revised landscape plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the revised landscape plan
substantially increases the sizes of the stock and also increases the number of
plantings and emphasizes perimeter screening on the north, west and south sides of
the development. The Planning Commission at its meeting on June 26 recommended
approval of the revised landscape plan. Mr. Larsen clarified that the referral to
the Planning Commission was for review of the landscape plan and that the request
before the Council now is for final rezoning and preliminary plat approval. Mayor
Courtney stated that he had received many letters from adjoining residents, copies
of which have been provided to the Council I4embers. Bob Gunderson, attorney for
Brutger Companies, noted that the concept for the project has been approved, sub-
ject to further review of the landscape plan and that the developer had met with
the adjoining residents for their comments. Steve Wilson, Brutger Companies,
stated that some changes have been made to the landscape plan and in meeting with
representatives from the Windwood Association they have found it acceptable as
indicated in the letter from the president of the Association dated June 26, 1985.
In the meeting with representatives of Dewey Hill Condominiums, the conversation
tended to move away from the landscape plan and there was no resolve of the matter.
Mr. Wilson then reviewed the landscape plan pointing out the changes in type, size
and number of trees and submitted that it is now compatible with the landscaping
found on adjacent properties. Mayor Courtney stated that from the letters he had
received the chief objection to the development was that townhouses were proposed
rather than a condominium building such as Dewey Hills Condominiums.
concerns and objections were Alvin liiller, Jack Eorciea and Albert Levine of 5501
Dewey Hill Road, and Alvyn Pope of 5601 Dewey Hill Road. Mr. Gunderson responded
that the project will offer new housing for families to enter Edina and support
the community, that the development is a quality project and will bring in quality
people.
adopt.ion of Ordinance No. 82545 as follows:
At its
The Planning Commission also received
Voicing their
No further comments being heard, Member Turner moved Second Reading and
ORDINANCE NO. 825-A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD-3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA. ORDAINS:
Section 1.
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub-District PRD-3) is
enlarged by the addition of the fallowing property:
Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet of the North 30 acres of the
NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, according to the U.S. Government Survey."
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage Sec. 2.
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
1
ATTEST :
74d3 lL.L-
City Clerk
7 115 185
Member Turner commented that each of the Council Members has listened to the
concerns expressed, has viewed the property and area, and reviewed the land-
scape plan.
the Comprehensive Plan and the density is appropriate.
concerns raised, Member Turner stated that if warranted we have measures for
reviewing increased traffic and the need for some kind of control.
commented that the Council must be guided by the Comprehensive Plan in attempting
to deliver various types of housing for the community and that she is satisfied
that it will be a first class project.
PRELMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
propo.sed plat for the Foster Green Addition, generally located west of Cahill
Road and south of Dewey Hill Road, which illustrated a lot for each individual
building and all other property would remain as an outlot and be controlled by
a condominium association. The site plan illustrates 26 townhouse units and
24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven buildings.
Levine, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, stated his objections to the proposed plat. He -
said there should only be one curb cut onto Cahill Road, that guest parking was at
a bare minimum, that the northwest building should be set back further, and that
there was an intense use of ground cover and urged the Council to limit the
number of units to be placed upon the site.
Iviember Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
The proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and
Regarding the traffic
Member Kelly
There were no further comments.
D PlannerQarsen@re&r&ed a
Albert
No further comments being heard,
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Foster Green Addition", platted by Brutger Companies, Inc.,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be
and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Hotion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR \?ARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
presented the petition for preliminary plat approval noting that the subject
property is located south of Grove Street and on the east end of the cul-de-sac
on Oak Lane. The property is part of an earlier subdivision of the area and
measures 138 feet in width, 239 feet in depth and is 33,057 square feet in size.
The proponent is requesting a subdivision which would create one buildable lot
of 12,237 square feet with the remaining 20,830 square feet designated as an
outlot.
extension of Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue.
acquired before this could take place.
temporary cul-de-sac which terminates in the northwesterly corner of the property.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proponent's intent is to create one buildable lot
while reserving the balance of the property for future subdivision.
balance of the property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be buildable
without replatting.
in the vicinity. At its June 26, 1985 meeting, the Community Development and
Planning commission approved the preliminary plat.
Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAZ,
Planner Larsen
A previous replat of this property included the dedication of an
The property is now accessed by a
Additional right of way must be
Since the
The lot size of the proposed lot is similar to other lots
No comment being heard, Hember
4 WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City.Counci1 of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Wa;den Acres Austin Replat", platted by Curtis E. Austin,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be
aod is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member.Turner. I Rollcall :
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 825-A7 GRANTED FIRST READING; R-1 to R-2 ZONING FOR ROBERT ANDERSON
(425 WASHINGTON AVENUE).
and ordered placed on file.
located at the corner of Washington Avenue and Naloney Avenue. County Road 18 is
located to the immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is to the south.
The property is a vacant lot measuring 70 feet in width, approximately 125 feet
in depth and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area. Robert Anderson, proponent,
is requesting rezoning of the site from R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2
Double Dwelling Unit District to allow tlie construction of a two-unit dwelling.
This request was heard at the llay 20, 1985 Council Neeting at which time the motion
for rezoning failed. At its mzeting of June 3, 1985, the Council took action to
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved
Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is
199
re-hear the request. Nr. Larsen pointed out that on the two-block stretch of
Washington Avenue there exists a variety of R-1 lots and R-2 lots.
there are six R-2 lots ranging in width from 76 feet to 124 feet with most being
76 to 79 feet in width.
45 and 78 feet in width.
Comprehensive Plan as suitable for conversion to this type of use.. Since the -
last Council Meeting the proponent has presented a petition from several neighbors
in the area in support of his petition for the rezoning.
ment and Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. Zlr. Larsen noted that,
.if the Council were to approve rezoning, the request would still have to petition
the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances for lot width and lot size.
Robert Anderson, the proponent, referred to the photograph he had submitted to
the Council and said the proposed dwelling would be similar and that he understood
that the plans would have to be approved by the Board of Appeals. He added that
he had talked to his neighbors and no one objected to the double unit dwelling.
No further comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced Ordinance No. 825-A7
for First Reading as follows:
Currently,
. There are eleven existing R-1 lots rangingbetween
Lots fronting on Washington Avenue are shown by the
The Community Develop-
ORDINANCE NO. 825-A7
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R-2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
the following thereto:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
"The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub-District R-2) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
Lot 14 and the south 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block 9, "West Minneapolis
Heights", except that part of said Lot 14 lying southwesterly of a
line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00
feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot 14 to a point on the
south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet east from the southwest
corner of said Lot 14."
Sec. 2.
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner who commented
that she supported the proposal for the reasons that it is a transitional area, it
is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as low density attached residential axd
that the proposed dwelling is appropriate for this site because of the busy highway
and other doubles in the area and that, even thought variences are required, it
would not set a precedence.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
Mayor Courtney said he agreed with Member Turner.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR CREEK VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH (6400 TRACY AVE.)
Planner Larsen presented the request of the Creek Valley Baptist Church, located
at 6400 Tracy Avenue, for a Conditional Use Permit.
is proposing construction of additional classroom space, restrooms and general
storage.
feet of which would be on the main floor, and would be to the south of the existing
structure.
changes to the site are contemplated at this time.
a Conditional Use Permit for any expansion of a church in the R-1 District.
on the 132 seats in the sanctuary, 44 parking spaces should be provided.
ing parking lot provides parking for 53 cars.
church is situated in a relatively isolated location.
City owned open space areas and to the north is the Crosstown Highway.
contains mature landscaping that provides additional screening.
materials of the addition will match the existing building and parking will be
provided in adequate numbers.
heard the request at its meeting of June 26, 1985 and recommends approval. No
comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) .
have been met, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825
have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Condi-
tional Use Permit to the Creek Valley Baptist Church at 6400 Tracy Avenue for the
purpose of constructing a 3,780 square foot addition to. their existing building,
according to plans submitted;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Permit be subject to the following condition:
1) Building materials for the addition must match the existing materials.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Creek Valley Baptist Church
The addition would contain a total of 3,780 square feet, 2,680 square
All classroom activities are currently held in the basement. No other
Based
The exist-
The Zoning Ordinance requires
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the
To the west and south are
The site
The design and
The Community Development and Planning Commission
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT
Rollcall :
Resolution adopted. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney *I
7 115 185
200
UPDATE GIVEN ON WOODDALE SCHOOL.
event held on July 13, 1985, as a
Edina Foundation, was a success.
IIr. Rosland advised that the Wooddale-Edinamite
goodbye to the school and a benefit for The
He has met with representatives of St. Stephens
Episcopal Church, 50th and Wooddale Avenues, regarding the parking lots - 42
spaces in Wooddale Park and 52 spaces in Utley Park, estimated at a cost of
approximately $100,000 and they have indicated that they feel the church will
participate in an assessment project for the parking lots, payable over 20 years.
Mr. Kojetin has met with the neighborhood group and they have concluded that the
park plans fit well with one exception. They are concerned about the total amount
of parking between the two parks.
parking now at Wooddale School consists of 88 spaces so, basically, the church
would be preserving the present parking.
hold a hearing so that the neighborhood residents could offer their comments
regarding the parking improvements. Following some discussion, it was informally
agreed to place the Wooddale Park improvements on the August 5, 1985 Council
agenda and to notify the Country Club District and immediate adjoining residents.
Bfr. Rosland pointed out that the existing I Mr. Rosland suggested that the Council
BID AWARDED FOR REMOVAL AND BACKFILL OF WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for the removal and backfill of Wooddale School showing Carl
Bolander & Sons Company at $123,500 .OO , Minnesota Lumber & Wrecking Corporation
at $127,955.00, Doty & Sons, Inc. at $163,000.00 and Duluth Superior Erection
at $174,500.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award
of bid to recommended low bidder, Carl Bolander & Sons Company at $123,500.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR TWO FALLS MODEL TAH-9 WINGS FOR SNOW PLOWS.
sented tabluation of bids for two Falls Model TAH-9 Wings for snow plows showing
LaHaas Manufacturing & Sale at $7,373.00 and Little Falls Iiachine at $7,410.00,
Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to
recommended low bidder, LaHaas Manufacturing & Sale at $7,373.00.
Mr. Rosland pre-
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
I BID AWARDED FOR EKERGENCY REPAIR TO PUMP FOR TBLL f6. Mr. Rosland advised that
emergency repairs were required for the pump for well #6.
showed Layne Minnesota, Inc. at $6,855.00, Keys Well Drilling at $8,275.00, and
E. H. Renner & Sons at $8,050.00.
Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Layne Minnesota, Inc. at
$6 , 855 . 00 .
Tabulations of bids
Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JULY 9, 1985 APPROVED.
was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action as
listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 9, 1985:
1) That NO PARKING ANYTIME signs be installed along the east and north sides of
Olinger Boulevard from Vernon Avenue to Olinger Road simultaneously with the
opening of the Bredesen Park parking lot,
Member Kelly's motion
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER FIVE YEAR PLAN REPORT GIVEN.
the Edina Community Center Advisory Board (ECCAB), advised that the ECCAB is
appointed by the school superintendent and has been in existence for four years.
Initially the ECCAB was responsible for all the closed schools in addition to
operating the Edina Community Center. Iir. Kelly stated that the parking problem
will be.a'lleviated by the addition of the new parking lots which will provide
230 additional spaces and the re-striping of the South View parking lot will
double the caFacity for overflow parking from the Community Center.
the ECCAB this year was to develop a Five Year Plan of operations and recommenda-
tions related to the long term structure of a Community.Center for the City of
Edina. A conceptual outline whLch was presented to the ECCAB in 1984 was . -
summarized with the comment that it formed the basis for the recommendations and
the Plan.
leaseable and non-leasable; hours of scheduled use; actual area use versus
potential use; projected use for next five years; five year expense summary of
capital improvements totaling $464,764; rental operation financial overview and
organizational structure. Mr. Kelly gave a.summary of the Board's recommendations
as follows: 1) A non-profit Edina Community Center entity be established to be the
responsible operating entity for the Center, 2) The School District and the City
of Edina be equal direct participants in the governance of the entity, 3) The
School District lease the Community Center building and appurtenant land to the
non-profit entity for 20 years or longer for $l.OO/yr., 4) The School District
Michael Kelly, Chairman of
I The task of
Graphics were presented showing Community Center space use, both
7/15/85
201
lease space back that is currently occupied and used by the District, 5) The School
District and the City support the capital needs of the Community Center, 6) The
five year operating budget be adopted, and 7) The principal planning recommendations
be adopted. Mr. Kelly stated they are hoping to have the building in operation as
an independent entity by the end of 1985. The Community Center has had a success-
ful beginning under the auspices of the District.
enough experience in operation to assure its future and is now ready to become a
true community directed facility.
School Board. The District plarsto work with the City on a planning committee level
to talk about a joint participation in the operation of this facility as a community
center. No action was taken by the Council.
It is an active facility, with
This information has been presented to the
AIRPLANE NOISE OVER CITY DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney stated that he has received many
telephone calls from residents regarding the increased aircraft noise over the City.
Mr. Rosland pointed out several factors which have contributed to this: 1) there
are more flights in and out of the metropolitan airport, 2) recent heat/humidity
do not give the planes lift and 3) wind conditions mandate use of the main runway.
In discussing the problem with the staff, the following suggestions were made:
1) Staff will attend the meeting of local and state officials representing rhe
communities surrounding the airport to be held at Richfield City Hall on July 25,
2) If, in fact, the airport authorities are moving the flights around to distribute
the noise burden, they should publically inform the populace of their procedures so
that people can understand what is happening, and 3) A report will be brought back
to the Council. No formal action was taken.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR NUMEROUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. As recommended by staff,
Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR
GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C-141
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-352
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-137A
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M-85
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-368
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-174
STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. L-25, L-26
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for
the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing form hereinafter recorded, and
the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and parcels
of land within the districts affected by said improvements, and said proposed
assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby approved and
the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to public inspection
pending hearings thereon as herein provided.
2.
form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the Clerk's
action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official newspaper in accord-
ance with law is hereby approved.
This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of Hearing
Notices being as follows:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
HEARING FOR ASSESSMENTS
Grading Improvement No. C-141.
Watermain Improvement No. WM-352
Street.Improvement No. BA-137A.
Maintenance Improvement No. M-85.
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-368
Storm Sewer Improvement No. St. S-174.
Street Lighting Improvement Nos. L-25, L-26.
- NOTICE OF PUBLIC
EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at. the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina,
Minnesota on Monday, September 16, 1985, at 7:OO P.M. to hear and pass upon
objections, if any to the.following proposed assessments. These assessments
are now on file in the office at the Edina City Clerk and open to public Inspect-
ion.
interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 11%% per annum from the date of
the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1986.
Assessment on the following will be payable in one equal installment with
1 CONSTRUCTION OF MAINTENANCE IMPROVEE'lENT NO. M-85..
District description: 50TH STREET AHD FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICT.
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 21,
22 and South 42% feet of Lot 20 and North.7Q feet of Lot 23, except road; that part
of Lot 24 lying South of the North 37 feet of Lot 24; Lot 25 and North 147 feet of
Lot 29 and East 1 foot of North 147 feet of Lot 30; Lot 26 thru 28 and South 3 feet
7/15/85
of Lot29 also West 65 feet of South 119.9 feet of Lot 30.and East 1 foot of South
133 feet of Lot 30 except street; West 119.9 feet of Lot 33; South 126 feet of Lot
34 and East 13 feet of Lot 35; West 28 feet of East 41 feet of South 90 feet of Lot
35; commencing at a point in South line of Lot 35 distance 41 feet West from South-
east corner thereof thence North 90 feet thence East 28 feet thence North 36 feet
thence West to East line of West 74.2 feet of Lot 35, thence North along said East
line to North line of South 160.3 feet of Lot 35 thence West along North line to
West line thereof thence South to Southwest corner thereof thence East to beginning
also that part of South 150.3 feet of Lot 36 lying Easterly of a line running from a
point in South line thereof distance 21.9 feet West from Southeast corner thereof to
.a point in North line thereof distance 21.45 feet ?est from Northeast corner thereof;
East 85 feet of West 120 feet of East 172 feet of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot
36 except street; that part of South 150.3 feet of Lot 36 lying Westerly of a line
running from a point in South line distance 21.9 feet West from Southeast corner
thereof to a point in North line thof distance 21.45 feet West from Northeast corner
thereof except street; that part of the following described premises lying below the
elevation of 899 feetmean sea level1929 adjustment: the South 43.5 feet of North
166.5 feet of West 54 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172
and the South 2 feet of East 6 feet of North 166.5 feet of Lot 43 and that part of
Lot 43 lying South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey
1426 and Northerly of a line drawn from the most Southerly and Easterly corner of
Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point oq the East line of Vest 107 feet of
Lot 44, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 distance 181.05 feet North of South line
thereof also that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 lying South of North
123 feet thereof; Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 and the North 166.5 feet of
East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdividion No. 172 and that part of Lot 43 lying
South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and
Northerly of a line dram from the most Southerly & Easterly corner of Tract A,
Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point on East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 distance 181.05 feet North of South line thereof
except that part of the above described premises lying below the elevation of 899
feet mean sea level 1929 adjustment described as follows: the South 43.5 feet of
of East 6 feet of North 166.5 feet of Lot 43 and that part of Lot 43 lying South of
North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and Northerly of a
line drawn from the most Soucherly & Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land
Survey 1426 to a point on the East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44 distance 181.05
feet North of South line thereof also that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey
1426'lying South of Eorth 123 feet thereof; West 107 feet of North 120 feet of Lot'
44; that part of Lot 45 described as commencing at a point in Northwest corner of
Lot 47 thence South to Southwest corner thereof thence West 13.9 feet thence South
1.1 feet thence West 36.1 feet thence South 2.4 feet thence West to a point 7 feet
East from West line of Lot 45 thence North 134.75 feet thence Vest 4 feet thence
North to South line of West 50th Street thence East 87 feet thence South to be-
ginning; South 70 feet of East 150 feet of -Lot 45 and North 2 feet of East 1/2 of
Lot 49; North 102 feet of East 1/2 of South 1/2 of Lot 49 except road; commencing
at a point in East line of Lot 49 distance 2 feet South from Northeast corner
thereof thence South 40.16 feet thence West to a point in West line of East 1/2 of
Lot 49 distance 43.3 feet South from Northwest corner thereof thence North 41.3
feet to a point 2 feet South from North line of said Lot thence East to beginning;
South 177.5 feet of Lot 31 except street; South 177 1/2 feet of Lot 32 and that
part of the North 1/2 of Lot 34 lying East of West 14.75 feet thereof and South
of Allatas 1st Addition except street; thence West 49 feet of Lot 47 and that part
of the East 51 feet of Lot 47 lying North of the South 2.45 feet thereof; the North 113 feet of the South 183 feet of East 150 feet of Lot 45, Auditor's Sub-
division No. 172 except that part,thereof below the elevation of 897 feet above
mean sea level and lying North of a line described as follows:
the Northeast corner of said South 183 feet thence on an assumed bearing of 50
degrees 20 minutes 20 seconds along the East line of Lot 45 a distance of 4.15
feet to the point of beginning of the line being described thence West 48.18
feet thence Westerly 49.02 feet along a tangential curve to the left with a
radius of 101.29 feet thence South 62 degrees 16 minutes 17 seconds West to a
distance of 32.39 feet thence Southwesterly 43.93 feet along a tangential
curve to the left with a radius of 50 feet to the West line of the East 150 feet
I
-North 166.5 feet of West 54 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43 and the South 2 feet
1
Commencing at
I .
of Lot 45 and there ending; East 52 feet of South 150.feet of North
36 except street, all in Auditor's Subdivision No. 172; Lot 8, Lund
Tract Cy Registered Land Survey 1426; Lot 1 and the West 35 feet of
of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision No.
street; Replat Lot 6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addition; Lot I, Block 1,
2. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET LIGHTING IM?ROVEMENT NO. L-25
District description:
The area proposed to be assessed is as folhws:
Between 6209 and 6217 Parnell Avenue.
West 1/2 of Lot
1/2 of Lot
Kruse Addition;
East 172 feet
172 except
Steven' s First .
2, Block 2;
West 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 2; East 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 3; East 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 3;
NORMANDALE ADDITION.
7 I15 I85
203
3. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-26.
District description: Corner of Ashcroft Lane and West 63rd Street.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lot 19, Block 2; Lot 8, Block 3;
VALLEY VIEW RIDGE ADDITION; Lot 16, Block 3; Lot 1, Block 4; VALLEY VIEW RIDGE 2ND
ADDITION.
Assessment on the followizlg will be payable in three equal installments over a
period of three (3) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of
ll%% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31,
1986.
4. CONSTRUCTION OF WATEWIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-352.
District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
5. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-368.
District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1, 'mNDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
6. CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING IMPROVEM33NT NO. C-141.
District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
7. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. ST.S.-174.
District description:
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows:
MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
Assessment on the following will be payable. in ten equal installments Over a period of ten (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of
11%% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31,
1986.
Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1,
8. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-137A.
District description:
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows:
Hansen Road from Vernon Avenue to West 60th Street.
Commencing at West line of Gov't
Lot 6 at a point 143.95 feet South from the Northwest corner of South 1/2 of Lot 6,
thence East 327.9 feet to a point in the West line of Block 4, Codes Highview Park
distance 143.87 feet South from the North line of South 1/2 of Gov't Lot 6, thence
South along West line of said Block 4, a distance of 123.87 feet, thence West 327.9
feet to a point in the West line of Lot 6, distance 123.95 feet South from beginning,
thence North to beginning except road; SEC. 33, TWP 117, RANGE 21 (33-117-21-32-0001);
Lots 7 thru 12, Block 3, CODES HIGHVIEW PARK ADDITION; Lot 1 (that part of the South
16 rods lying East of RR right of way); Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, EMIL P. ERICKSON
ADDITION; Lot 6 (South 135 feet of North 202.7 feet lying East of RR right of Way);
that part of Lot 6 lying East of RR right of way and North of South 399 feet thereof
ais0 that part of Lot 7 lying E of R.R right of way; that part of the North 202.7 feet
of Lot 6 and of Lots 7,8 and 9 lying West of a line de'scribed as follows: Commencing
at a point 55.6 feet West from West line of RR right of way and 264 feet North from
South line of Lot 6, thence North 3' East 146 feet thence North 20' East 630 feet,
thence North parallel with East line of Garden Park Addition to South line of Eden
Prairie Road, all in GARDEN PARK ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, E.V. KLOPP'S SUB-
DIVISION; Lots 11 thru 16, Block 3, MELODY KNOLLS SIXTH ADDITION; Lots 1 and 2,
NAOMI ADDITION; Lot 1 and West 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, HAYDEN ADDITION; Lot 1 and
adjacent part of Lot 33,.Wardea Acres lying East of RR right of way; Lot 2 and South
90 feet of North 190 feet of that part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of RR right
of way; Lot3 and South 109 feet of that part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East Of
RR right of way; Lot 4, all in Block 1, THEO. NELSON'S ADDITION; Lots 13,14 and that
part of Gov't Lot 3 lying Northwesterly of M.N.&S. RR right of way as widened except
road, Lots 15 and 16, RICHMOND HILLS THIRD ADDITION; Lots 5 thru 8, Block 1, TOWN'S
FIRST EDINA ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES BERG REPLAT; Lots 7 thru
9, Block 7, WESTCHESTER KNOLLS ADDITION; Lots 1,2,5, Block 1, WOODY POINT ADDITION.
First payment of these assessments will be payable with the taxes for the year 1985
collectible in 1986.
same rate for one year on all unpaid installments.
assessed for the above improvements may pay the whole of the assessment without
interest to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1985, or make payment with
accrued interest to the County Treasurer.
the District Court pursuant to ~nnesota Statutes, Section 429.081, by serving
notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty
(30) days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing
such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the
The owner of the property
Any owner may appeal the assessment to
However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection
signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of
Edina prior to the hearing'or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing.
7/15/85
204
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,.the City of Edina has adopted standards and guide-
lines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons
65 years of age or older for whom payments would be a hardship. To obtain deferment,
application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close of business on
the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph
of this notice. For further information and application forms, please call or visit
the City Assessor's office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk I Rollcall :
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BLAKE SCHOOL REQUEST FOR DRIVEWAY ACCESS DISCUSSED.
Manager, advised that Blake Schools, Hopkins, has requested the use of a portion
of the streetcar right of way which is located on the south side of the Blake
Schools property to route school bus traffic out the southwest corner of their
parking lot.
car right of way, existing onto Second Street South. Edina and Hopkins each own
a portion of the streetcar right of way.
the street is approximately 400 feet.
A public informationalmeeting was held by Blake Schools for concerned neighbors
on July 10, 1985.
for the City of Edina to grant permission for the subject area to be improved to
accommodate bus'traffic, staff would suggest a public hearing be set for August 5-,
1985 with notices to abutting property owners on the Edina.side.
that Marlys Canter and Mr. Stoddard were present representing Blake Schools. In
response to Member Kelly's question as to the amount of bike traffic, Mr. Hughes
said it was substantial and was an active bike trail.
greater concern was unauthorized use by cars and other vehicles trying to short
cut into the school parking lot.
a legal problem with allowing a private use of public property.
made a motion setting a public hearing on the matter for August 5, 1985 if the
City Attorney determines that there is no legal problem with the proposed use of
public property.
Gordon Hughes, Assistant City
The proposed school bus exit route would be onto the vacated street-
The distance from the parking lot to
Currently, it is being used as a bike path.
The request is presented so that if there is the possibility
Mr. Hughes noted
He pointed out that the
Attorney Erickson submitted that there might be
Member Kelly
, Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS MADE TO EDINA FOUNDATION AND HEALTH BOARD; FOUNDATION BY-LAW CHANGES
DISCUSSED; OTHER VACANCIES CONTINKED. Mayor Courtney recalled that at its last
meeting, the Council informally agreed to hold the appointment of two directors
and to see if any other individuals are interested in serving on the Board.
a brief discussion, Member Kelly made a motion that Robert Sherman and John Skager-
berg be reappointed to The Edina Foundation Board for terms to be established by
the amended Bylaws; Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
'to The Edina Foundation so that the matter of staggered terms could be determined
After
James Van Valkenburg, President of The Edina Foundation, reported that he had met
with the School Board regarding proposed changes to the Bylaws,..They had agreed'. .I
that the Bylaws be anended'to stagger the .terms so that in any given year one repre-
sentative from the School District, the City, and the membership at large is
appointed.
terms.
of the City and that ten years should be the maximum for serving on the Foundation
Board.
the changes as directed by the Council and the School Board.
then submitted that Eileen Cooke, 3705 W. 61st Street, had submitted her name for
appointment to the Advisory Board of Health.
by Member Kelly appointing Eileen Cooke to the Advisory Board of Health for an
unexpired term to February 1, 1986.
Also discussed was the matter of residency and number of successive
The School Board had indicated that six board members should be residents
It was informally agreed that draft Bylaws should be-prepared reflecting
Mayor Courtney
Motion of Member Turner was seconded
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Mayor Courtney pointed out that there is a vacancy on the Community Development
and Planning Commission and also on the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and that
a number of individuals have submitted their names for appointment. It was
informally agreed to ask those individuals who have not done so to submit back-
ground information/resumes to aid the Council in making the appointments at the
next Council meeting.
CONSUMER DEPOSIT LEVIED AGAINST ICEST 4 OF .LOT 5, BLOCK 3, AND EAST 30 FEET OF
LOT 1, BLOCK 4, WOODBURY PARK NEAR LAKE HARRIET. Mr. Rosland advised that a
request has been to allow Sheryl L. and David M. Waterman, 3800 West 55th Street,
7 /15/ 85
205
to pay the water connection charge from Watermain No. 335 to their property,
the West 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 3 and the East 30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury
Park near Lake Harriet, over a period of six years at the applicable interest
rate.
connection charge would be a consumer deposit so that if the watermain is ever
extended in the f.uture, a portion of the deposit would be refundable.
Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assessment
of a consumer deposit for water connection for Watermain No. 335 in the amount
of $2,645.62 to be levied against the West 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 3, and the East
30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury Park near Lake Harriet over a six-year period
at an interest rate of 7%. .
It was explained that this is a longer run connection than normal and
Member
RESOLUTION
Rollcall: .
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
UMBRELLA INSURANCE DISCUSSED; LIABILITY INSURANCE CAP OF $500,000 AFFIRMED.
Mr. Rosland advised that a quote for $1,000,000 umbrella insurance has been received.
The cost would be $77,000, plus an additional $20,000 to bring the Police liability
up to $1,000,000. A major condition is that the City would be required to purchase
additional coverage to bring the City's liability insurance up to $1,000,000. This
additional coverage was quoted at $82,000.
to purchase the $1,000,000 umbrella, the final cost would be $179,000. Staff would
not recommend this option. As an alternative, because the City's current liability
coverage is $500,000 and does not meet the liability cap set by the State of
$200,000/600,000, it is recommended that we bring the City's liability coverage up
to $1,000,000 and not purchase the excess umbrella coverage. The cost to the-City
under this option would be $82,000 and would put our level of liability in excess of
the State cap.
spectively rather than retroactively to impose liability where people have been
acting reasonably upon the statutory limitations.
brought their liability coverage up to $1,000,000 it would be covered as to tort
liability by exceeding the statutory minimum except for one area.
recently added a third catagory of liability for cities which was the release or
threatened release of toxic substances which established the maximum liability at
twice the liability for other kinds of torts. Therefore, the City would have a
possible exposure for hazardous substances of $1,200,000.
insurance companies at the present time will not write hazardous substances insur-
ance. If ,the Council elected not to increase the City's liability coverage, it
would in effect be self-insuring for any judgment over the City's coverage. After.
further discussion, Member Bredesen made a motion to stay with the current liability
coverage of $500,000 and not to purchase the umbrella coverage as quoted.
was seconded by Member Kelly.
The net result would be that in order
Attorney Erickson explained that the courts have been acting pro-
He pointed out that if the City
The statute also
Mr. Rosland .advised that
Motion
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Bredesen asked that the staff document the City's risk management program
far'xeview by the Council at its August 5, 1985 meeting to determine if it is
adequate, that it is documented and that a rational person would agree that the
City took reasonable steps to prevent loss problems from occuring.
bridge replacement
ON STREET3 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (WEST 44TH STREET) APPROVED;
Engineer Hoffman presented a Feasibility Report on street and
for West 44th Street from T.H. 100 to the So0 Line Railroad,
advising that the project was previously approved by the Council but reconfir-.
mation is required prior to bid opening. The report Also recommended sidewalk
repair at various locations in the Country Club District.
-
Member Bredesen intro-
duced the following resolution and moved adoption: '. 1 I.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
IMPROVEMENT NO. P-BA-262
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P-s-34
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to '
the feasibility of the proposed Street and Bridge Replacement and Sidewalk
Replacement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to
the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed
to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvements.
3.
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be
not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to
This Council shall meet on Monday, August 5, 1985, at 7:OO p.m. in the Edina.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
all affected properties in substantially the following form:
7/15 /85
.. 206
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PERkWENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVMNT NO. P-BA-262
S.A.P. 120-140-01
SIDETJALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P-S-34 I The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 5,
1985, at 7:OO P.M., to consider the following proposed improtements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set
forth below:
West 44th Street - T.H. 100 to Brookside Court
Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete
Curb and Gutter - Improvement No. P-BA-262
ESTIMATED COST
$323,404.87
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvements includes Lot 17 and 19, Aud. Sub'd. No. 176; Lots 10 and 11,
Thielen's Brookside; Lots 7 and 8, Subd. No. 176; Lots 1, 2, and 3,
Block 4, Arden Park Third Addition; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Arden Park
3rd Addition.
Country Club District
Sidewalk Replacement Improvement No. P-S-34
ESTIMATED COST
115,338.88
The area proposed to be assessed includes all properties in the Country Club
District, Brown Section and Fairway District.
Marcella M. Daehn, City
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Ro.llcal1:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Clerk
HEARING DATE SET FOR EDINBOROUGH UTILITIES AND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO SOUTH-
EAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT.
seconded by Member Kelly, setting August 19, 1985, as hearing date for Edin-
As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was
borough utilities and amendment to Agreement to Southeast Edina Redevelopment.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON EDINA PROSECUTION. Mr. Rosland stated that, in response to the
Council's request, a report has been prepared on the matter of Edina prosecution
and resulting costs which in 1985 have been running above the .amount budgeted.
In preparing the 1986 Budget, the Council may wish to consider a policy question
on the degree of enforcement the City should pursue. Mr. James Van Valkenburg
reviewed the report noting in particular the increased number of DWI citations
and a total of 12,243 citations issued by the Police Department in 1984. He also
pointed out the complex procedure of a file through the court system.
Hallberg, Prosecuting Attorney, commented that there is a trend towards requiring
community service of defendants instead of imposing fines resulting in reduced
revenues. Personalities involved in the court system also have a great effect
upon how efficiently the system may run which also affects revenues. Member
Bredesen commented that, if the public policy of the State is to encourage.cit:fes
to prosecute DWIs and other offenses and then impose a financial penalty for
strict enforcement, this should be addressed to our representatives in the
legislature; that the residents of the City should not be forced to pay the cost
associated with DTJI prosecution through their tax levy.
letter communicating this be sent to our representatives andlor the Municipal
Legislative Comission. No formal action was taken.
FIRE DEPT C)RGANIZATION/PARAMEDIC PROGRAM DISCUSSED; CONT'D TO 7/22/85 Mr . Rosland
stated that the paramedic program has been under discussion for several years
and that the Council, after consideration of alternatives and recommendations,
will decide if the paramedic service will continue to be delivered by the City or
by some alternative system. Mr. Rosland then called on Robert Buresh, Public
Safety Director, to explain the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system.
Mr. Buresh explained that the City's authority starts with the State who by
statute regulates EMS at least to the Advanced Life Support (ALS) level. We
also get our authority through an Hennepin County EMS Ordinance which regulates
various aspects of the EMS program. Medical direction comes from a Hennepin
County EMS medical director who monitors all operational aspects of the program,
The records part of the system is regulated through the Community Health Depart-
ment who monitors us via reports in relation to the other ambulance services in
Mr. Marsh
He suggested-that a
.
7 115185
207
the community.
was developed, made up of representatives from all parts of the system, to over-
see the process and the Council is continually reviewing the many aspects of the
system to upgrade it to meet current needs. If the City chooses to give up its
license from the State, we notify the Community Health Department and they in
turn would refer the request to the Zoning Committee of the Council. The Zoning
Committee will evaluate this service area to see where it most likely should go.
Mr. Buresh noted that local requests as to provider usually prevail. In the
alternative, the City could negotiate directly with another provider for EMS
services. Hennepin County is interested in taking over this zone at an estimated
cost of $375,000 per year to operate one unit around the clock, plus administra-
tive costs for an approximate total of $500,000.
would be a lose situation as EIG senrice in Edina will not generate $500,000 in
revenue. William Feck, Fire Chiet, then presented graphics showing the following:
1) emergency medical calls and response times, 2) 1984 costs for 27-man fire
suppression force and ambulance fee revenues, 3) paramedic program costs for 1984,
27-man fire suppression force, 4) Edina Fire Department 1985 budget with added
costs for two additional paramedics, 5) paramedic program costs for 1985, 29-man
suppression force, 6) paramedic program costs and revenues, and 7) comparision
of ambulance service fees.
force would remain the same if the City were not doing paramedic work.and if the
force were reduced would there not be a major savings in cost.
that when fire suppression services are inter-related with another service it
becomes more complex.
to handle an initial response to a structural fire of one of Edina's average largest
the normal response as set out by the national standards for fire suppression.and
pointed out that problems can develop quickly if you operate with short manpower.
This response requires a team of 10 to 13 firefighters to suppress the fire safely.
It means that 8 men must be scheduled on a day shift to work out vacations/holidays,
plus the chief officer and 3 people in the fire prevention bureau. On evenings and
weekends the schedule can-be stripped down to a &man shift because it-is easier to
get off-duty response and volunteer help.
6 to 10 working fires per year of this type that involve the entire structure; many.
are caught in the earlier stages. He explained that service levels are a function of
economics, tradition, politics, professional opinion, management, attitudes and related
services.
the development of the building insp'ections program which involves the Department
in plan review of new building construction and remodeling, beginning with Southdale
Center in 1955.
including fire suppression, emergency medical services and fire prevention and
control. The Department has integrated the firefighters into the related services
of the City. If the EMS service.iS reduced, it would give.the Department more man-
hours to be involved in other aspects of fire suppression. If the fire suppression
side of the Department is reduced, it would definitely affect the related services. . Mr. Rosland stated that he has been working with John Maloney, union representative,
as to how the union perceives the survival of the paramedic program. They have
proposed the following: 1) paramedics would continue to be firefighters principally,
2) within three months the City would bring the Department up to 29 men, 3) the City
would maintain at least 3 paramedics per 24-hour shift and when this number is not
possible, the paramedics on duty would be kept from all but emergency duties; they
would also not be asked to change shifts to avoid this problem, 4) the City would
make every effort to recruit and train paramedics from within the Department, and
5) if the preceding were accomplished, 7 of the present 8 paramedics would continue
as paramedics through 1986. Mr. Rosland advised that in researching other alter-
natives, there are three other providers, Hennepin County, Smith-Vartin and Fair-
view-Southdale Hospital. He introduced Dr. Timothy Crimmins, emergency physician
at Fairview-Southdale Hospital, advising*.that he.-is the new.medica1 director-for the
Center, is chairman of the Ethics Committee of the EMS Council and has had the oppor-
tunity to observe the EMS system through the metro area and is very familiar with
each of the ambulance services. He identified five areas to consider when looking at
ambulance service: 1) how fast can we get an ambulance to the patient's home, to
that instution, to that public place or out on the highway, 2) what quality of
medical care can we deliver once there, 3) professional attitude of the paramedics,
4) what other'services can the paramedics provide to the community, and 5) who can
do it at the lowest cost.
after investigation by WCCO and alledged serious wrongdoings has been bought out by
another entity and are going through reorganization to improve their quality of care.
Hennepin County Medical Center has excellent quality of care and have good response
times, but not as good as the Edina based service.
covering a large area.. They are constantly moving their paramedics around through-
out the system and tend to be a little out of service at times.
that the Edina paramedics are very familiar with the community and buildings in the
Because the system is complex, the Hennepin County EMS Council
It was pointed out that this I
Member Bredesen asked why it is assumed that the fire
Mr. Buresh responded 0 00
c') a homes. Anything more than that would be handled by mutual aid. He illustrated
On the fire suppression side, the department is geared up
Mr. Buresh pointed out that there are
A major factor in keeping the Fire Department budget in line has been
Mr. Buresh presented a graphic showing a typical service level
I
. paramedic program. Dr. Crimmins stated that he trained at the Hennepin County Medical
He evaluated the alternative providers. Smith-Martin,
Hennepin County is a big service
Dr. Crimmins said
7/15/85
208
City and know how to get to patients fast, that they have a very professional
attitude, and that by maintaining the service in Edina the City has control of
its funding. The Edina paramedics provide other services to the community,
e.g. fight structural fires, inspect buildings, are involved in community
education and teach CPR to first responders in the community. He also noted
that there is 'an unseen factor of cooperation with the Police Department.
the team effort at the scene of an emergency results in better medical care.
Dr. Crimmins stated that he felt the Council should make the commitment to add
at least two paramedics to make the Edina fire-based system work.
senthal, 6936 Hillcrest Lane, made a plea to increase the paramedic force to
insure that the residents of Edina are served prop.erly and:promptly in emer-
gency situations. Mr. Rosland recalled that in 1979 a study was made of the
manpower and organization of the Fire Department and it was felt that the City
could survive the paramedic system with a 29-man suppression force with help
by re-establishing the volunteer system.
established.- Fees for ambulance service have been raised to surpass the county
level and a tougher collection policy has been adopted.
in 1985 fees will generate revenue in excess of $200,000 which will pay for
two additional paramedics on the regular firefighter salary as well as picking
up approximately the $113,000 cost of the paramedic program. Mr. Rosland said
he would recommend that the City hire two additional paramedics to survive the
fire-based paramedic program.
program, we would have to look at the size of our fire suppression force and
look at a level of service the City could provide.
excellent opportunity to work with Fairview-Southdale Hospital to provide EMS
service and that if the Council should decide to look at other providers, the
staff would like the opportunity to let those providers present a full and
detailed report to the Council as to their EMS services.
5020 Richmond Drive, urged the Council to continue the Edina paramedic program.
Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany Road, also spoke in support of the recommendation.
Member Bredesen commented that he would like to have time to digest the infor-
mation presented before acting on the recommendation and suggested it be brought
back on the Council agenda or considered at a special meeting.
said she concurred with Member Bredesen.
the consideration of two additional paramedics to the special meeting scheduled
for July 22, 1985, at 5:OO p.m. No formal action was taken.
ORDINANCE REGARDING SPECIAL PURPOSE POOLS TO BE DRAFTED. Member Kelly advised
that she had received a telephone call from a resident concerning requirements
for wading pools.
the Council's consideration at the next meeting.
UPDATE GIVEN ON PROPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT IN BLOOMINGTON. Mr. Hughes gave a
brief report on the hearing before the Metropolitan Council and their comments
on the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Homart development in
Bloomington.
write a letter to Mayor Lindau of Bloomington with the request that the two
councils meet to discuss the development.
draft of our concerns regarding the density and traffic impact of the project.
No formal action was taken.
That
James Fel-
That volunteer system has been
It is estimated that
He added that if we find we cannot survive the
He stated that there is an
Douglas Erickson,
Member Kelly
It was informally agreed to continue I
Mr. Rosland advised that an ordinance will be drafted for
After a brief discussion, it was suggested that the Mayor again
Staff was also asked to prepare a
ALISON FUHR APPOINTMENT TO REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD SUPPORTED. Mr. Rosland
advised that the Regional Transit Board is meeting on July 22, 1985 to consider
applications for members of the Board whose membership is being reduced from
15 to 9 members. Mrs. Alison Fuhr is currently serving on the Board and would
like to continue. A letter of recommendation on her behalf has been sent to
the Board and she would welcome Council support.
AMM SEEKING MEMBERS TO SERVE ON LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES. Mr. Rosland advised
that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is seeking persons to serve
on various legislative committees.
Housing Committee.
the General Legislation Committee.
No formal action was taken.
He noted that Member Turner chairs the
Mayor Courtney said that he has volunteered to serve on
MLC LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR JULY 24. Mr. Rosland informed the Council
that the Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee has scheduled a
legislative dinner at-the Decathlon Club on- July 24, 1985 , with Representative
William Schreiber as speaker and asked that the Council Members contact him if
they wish to attend.
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT REORGANIZATION NOTED. Mr. Rosland said
that the Hennepin County Park Reserve District is re-forming and members of the
Minneapolis Park Board will no longer be serving on the Board after September 1.
In their place, commissioners will be appointed from the suburbs, two to be
7/15/85
209
4 0
appointed by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and one will be appointed
by the four remaining suburban members. The name will be changed to the Suburban
Hennepin Regional.Park District. Mayor Courtney said he was interested and would
appreciate the Council's support.
name to be considered for appointment.
Mr. Rosland said he would submit Mayor Courtney's
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-262. As recommended by staff, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND
FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING & CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
IMRPOVEMENT NO. BA-262
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
I
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-262
CONTRACT #85-8 (ENG)
'S .A.P. 120-140-01
BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 7, 1985
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street at 11:OO A.M., Wednesday, August 7, 1985. The Edina
City Council will meet at 7:OO P.M., Monday, August 19, 1985 to consider said
bids. The following are approximate major quantities:
1200 L/F, Concrete Curb and Gutter
500 Tons, Bituminous Paving
600 L/F, 10" Steel H-Piling
79 C/Y, (1A43) Structure Concrete
196 C/V, (3Y43) Structure Concrete
1 Remove Old Bridge and Replacement
24,910 Pounds, Reinforcement Bars
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids shall be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving
them may be returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans.and specifications on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
$25.00 (by check).
specificatidns with a bona fide bid.
and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk in the
amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. The City Council
reserved the right to reject any or all bids.
check for $5.00 payable to the' City of Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of
Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and
No bids will be considered unless sealed
All plans mailed, enclose separate
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Rollcall :
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS
AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS; AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND
PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE. Mr. Dalen recommended that the City authorize the
issuance and public sale of $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds to
finance the Edinborough redevelopment project and of $1,200,000 General Obligation
Go15 Course Bonds to finance the construction of improvements to Braemar Golf
Course. Member Kelly introduced the followi'ng resolution and moved its adoption:
7/15/85
210
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985; AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985; AND $1,200,000 GENERAL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and beneficial for the City to
construct improvements to the municipal golf course consisting of the construction
of a maintenance building, the upgrading of the par 3 golf course and the con-
struction of an addition to the clubhouse.
betterment of recreational facilities for the City of Edina, it is necessary for
the City to issue and sell its General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985
in the principal amount of $1,200,000 (the Golf Course Bonds) pursuant to Minn-
esota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. This Council
estimates that the net revenues derived from the operation of the municipal
liquor stores, in excess of the cost of operation and maintenance thereof, in the
fiscal year which ended December 31, 1984, equals or exceeds the maximum amount of
principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on all of the out-
standing Golf Course Bonds of the City, dated as of December 1, 1963, on all of
the outstanding Recreation Center Bonds, dated as of November 1, 1978 of the City
and on the Golf Course Bonds, as proposed to be issued under the terms set forth
in this Resolution. Prior to the delivery of the Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985,
to the purchaser, the Council will establish a fund for the payment of principal
and interest on the Golf Course Bonds.
to such fund an amount of revenues of the municipal liquor stores which is equal
to the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Golf
Course Bonds.
2. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and
462.581 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City does
authorize the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985 (the Tax Increment Bonds) in the principal amount of $12,000,000 for
the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs
needed for a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, subdivision 10, to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan, within a tax increment financing district, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, previously established by
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina and approved
by the City. The Golf Course Bonds and the Tax Increment Bonds are hereinafter
collectively ref erred to as the "Bonds".
3. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.54, subdivision 2, the
maturities of the Tax Increment Bonds are combined with the maturities of the
General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1981, of the City, for the purpose
of compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475<-54, sub-
division 1.
4. It is hereby determined that this Council shall meet at the City Hall at
7:OO o'clock P.M. on August 19, 1985 to receive, open and consider bids for and
award the sale of the Bonds.
5.
and purpose of said sale to be published at least 10 days in advance of the bid
.opening in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a
periodical published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, giving financial news and of
general circulation throughout the State, which notice shall be in substantially
the following form:
This Council further determines that in order to finance this acquisition and I
The Council will appropriate and credit
1
The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place
NOTICE OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
' TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$i,200, ooo GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS,
SERIES 1985
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will meet at the City Hall
in Edina, Minnesota at 7:OO o'clock P.M. Central Daylight Time, on Monday, August 19, 1985, to receive, open and consider the
bids for and award the sale of $12,000,000 General Obligation
Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 and $1,200,000 General
Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 (the Bonds) of the
City.
financing the construction of improvements to the City's
municipal golf course, and the Tax Increment Bonds will be
issued for the purpose of financing the public redevelopment
cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance
with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan.
September 1, 1985, the Bonds will mature on January 1 in the
following years and amounts:
The Golf Course Bonds will be issued for the purpose of
Dated
7/15/85
211
d 0 00 0
5 m
Year
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
200.5
2006
Golf Course Bonds
$ 50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
$1,200,000
Tax Increment Bonds
$ 150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
200,000
200.000
400,000
900,000
900,000 . 900,000
900,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,050,000
1,050,000,
$12,000,000
Total
$ 50,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
300,000 .
300,000
500,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,050,000 .
1,050,000
1,050,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,QOO
1,000,000
1,050,000
1,050,000
$13,200,000
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually on each Jmuary 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue
maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part, akd if in part, in inverse order of maturities of this issue and
by lot within maturities of an issue, on January 1, 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued
to the date of redemption. each issue of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned.
A legal opinion with respect to
Dated: July 15, 198s.
-.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn,
.. .
... . City Clerk
6.
.issuance of the Bonds, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
cause the following terms and conditions to be incorporated in material
distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds.
The following shall constitute thc terms and conditions for the sale and
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will meet at 7:OO o'clock P.M., Central Daylight Time, on Monday,
August 19, 1985, to receive, open and to consider bids for and award the general obligation bonds (the Bonds) of the City in the aggregate principal amount of $13,200,000 to be issued by the City upon the following terms and conditions:
PURPOSE
The Bonds will comprise two issues:
$1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 to be issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to finance the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf
course; and
$12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 to be issued to finance the public redevelopment cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581, Chapter 475.
BOND REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT
AND PAYING AGENT
The City will select a suitable bank or trust company
. to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register.wi.11 be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The
City will pay the charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint
a successor.
DATE, TYPE AND DENOMINATION
The Bonds, as originally issued, will be dated as of
September 1, 1985. The Bonds,will be issuable only as fully registered Bonds i'n denominations of $5,000 or any multiple
thereof, of single maturities, with interest payable by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name each Bond is
7/15/85
212
registered at the close of business on ehe 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month preceding each interest
payment date, as shown by the register maintained by the Registrar. Principal is payable ugon surrender of each Bond at maturity or upon prior redemption at the office of the
Registrar.
MATURITIES
The Bonds of each issue will mature on'January 1 in
the following years and amounts:
--. Golf course Tax Increment Year Bonds Bonds Total .-
1988 $ 50,000 $ 50.000
1989 50,000 $ 150,000 200,000
1990 50,000 150.000 200,000
1991 50,000 150,000 200,000
1992 50,000 150,000 200,000
100,000 200,000 300,000 1993
1994 . 100,000 200 8 000 300 I 000
1995 100,000 400,000 500,000
1996 100,000 900 # 000 1,000,000
1997 100,000 900 8 000 1,000,000
1998 150,000 900,000 1,050,000
1999 150,000 900,000 1,050,000
2000 150,000. . 900,000 1,050,000
2001 1,000,000 1,000,000
2002 1,000,000 1,000,000
2003 1,000,000 1,000,000
2004 - 1,000,000 1,000,000
200s 1,050,000 1,050,000
2006 1,050,000 1,050,000
$1,200,000 $12,000,000 $13,200,000
REDEMPTION
Bonds of each issue maturing in 1997 and subsequent
years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in
inverse order of maturities and by lot within maturities, on January 1,.1996, and any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus
accrued interest to the date of redemption.
INTEREST
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semi-annually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1.
Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of
issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. in an integral multiple of 5/100 or 118th of 1%. an6 no rate of interest or the net effective rate af any issue of Bonds may exceed the maximum rate to be determine6 in accordance wizh Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 4.
All
Each rate must be
DELIVERY
Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver
to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. notify the Registrar, at least 5 business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be
initially registered and the authorized denominations of the
Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the
original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the bonds is then
pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designateddepositary on the date of closing in immediately available funds.
The original purchaser of the Bonds must
&GAL OPINIONS
A legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be provided by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be printed on the appropriate Bonds at the request of the purchaser. The legal
opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their -terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by-
State of Minnesota or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights generally.
TYPE OF BID AND AWm
Sealed bids for not.less than $12,945,000 and accrued interest on the principal sum of $13,200,000 must be mailed or
delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time stated above. bidder after the time specified above for opening bids. bid must be unconditional and accompanied by a cashier's or certified check or bank draft in the amount of $264,000,
No bid may be altered or withdrawn by the
Each
I
.I
1
I
7/15 / 85
213
4 0
m
U
payable to the City, to be retained as liquidated damages if ghe bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The bid offering the lowest net interest cost (total interest
from date of Bonds to stated maturities, less any amount more than $13,200,000 or plus any amount less than $13,200,000 bid for principal) will be deemed most favorable. In the event
that. two or mote bids stated the lowest net cost, the sale of the Bonds will be awarded by lot.
less than $12,945,000 for principal, plus accrued interest on all Bonds will be considered. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive informalities in the bid, and
to adjourn the sale.
No oral bid and no bid of
CUSIP NUMBERS
The City Will assume no obligation for the assignment
or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the
purchaser, if the pruchaser waives any extension of the time of delivery caused thereby.
obtained from the undersigned. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk
7. The City Treasurer-Finance Director, is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare on behalf of the City an official statement to be distributed to potent-
ial purchasers of the Bonds.
of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 6 hereof and such other
information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to adequately describe
the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds.
Such official statement shall contain the statement : Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Turner, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the
Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
None
LIQUOR FUND REPORT as of May 31, 1985 was presented, reviewed and ordered placed
on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner, for payment
of the following claims dated 7/15/85:
$6,881.82, Swimming Pool Fund $1,205.90, Golf Course Fund $74,754.97, Recreation
Center Fund $3,530.50, Utility Fund $14,511.86, Liquor Dispensary Fund $89,437.88,
Construction Fund $296,965.60, IMP Bond Redemption f2 $7,265.99, Total $580,959.67.
General Fund $86,405.25, Art Center
Ayes: Bredesen, Ke.lly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
City Clerk