The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018_2_13_Meeting(959)Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Edina City Hall Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call was Chair Birdman and members Loving, Moore, Sussman, Kelly, Nymo, and student member Seeley. Absent were members Blake, Mondry and student member Sipes. Staff Liaison, Emily Bodeker, and Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel were also in attendance. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by Moore to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. The Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Nymo to approve the minutes from the October 10th, 2017 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Comprehensive Plan Staff Liason Bodeker explained the Chapter Assessment Tool. She inserted the 2017 Comp Plan Goals & Policies that the HPC previously worked on. The Heritage Preservation Commission approved the document be passed on to the Planning Commission and the Comprehensive Plan Consultants. B. Grandview Green Lid Development Heritage Preservation Consultant Vogel discussed the Grandview Green Lid development and the potential impact on heritage landmarks (Cahill School and Minnehaha Grange Hall). The Commission agreed they would like to stay ahead of the project and hope to look further into the properties by Springtime. C. Preservation Resources: Minnehaha Creek Watershed Heritage Preservation Consultant Vogel discussed preservation resources in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and expressed that the Commission should reach out to the Watershed District. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: D. Archaeological Modeling Heritage Preservation Consultant Vogel informed the Commission that pre-application for grants will be opening up soon. Vogel expressed to the HPC that there may be an opportunity to apply for a grant for archeological modeling. The Commission was interested in Vogel applying for this grant. VII. Correspondence And Petitions: None VIII. Chair And Member Comments: Commissioner Moore announced the following upcoming Edina Historical Society events: • History of Agriculture in Edina, November 16, 2017, Grange Hall 7:00 PM – 8:30 PM • Christmas in the North Star State, November 30, 2017, Grange Hall 7:00 PM – 8:30 PM • Christmas Tea & Vintage Hats, December 2, 2017 Grange Hall 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM • 100 Years of Christmas at Dayton’s, December 6, 2017 Grange Hall 7:00 PM – 8:30 PM • Christmas on the 8th Floor: The Magic that was Dayton's/Marshall Field's/Macy's, December 14, 2017Grange Hall 7:00 PM – 8:30 PM Commissioner Nymo announced that the 88th Mount Olivet Lutefisk dinner is on Friday, December 1st from 3:00pm -7:00 pm. IX. Staff Comments: Staff Liaison Bodeker told the Commission that she is planning to do a presentation on the History of Housing to an Edina High School class. X. Adjournment: 8:00 p.m. Motion made by Moore to adjourn the October 10th, 2017 meeting at 8:10 p.m. Motion seconded by Nymo. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily BodekerEmily BodekerEmily BodekerEmily Bodeker February 13, 2018 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Bodeker, AICP, Assistant City Planner Certificate of Appropriateness: 4518 Drexel Avenue – New Detached Garage Information / Background: The subject property, 4518 Drexel Avenue, is located on the west side of the 4500 block of Drexel Avenue. The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness request includes a new detached garage, a rear yard two story addition, and a home remodel. The home, built in 1924, is a Spanish Colonial Revival (Mediterranean) style. The existing stucco on the exterior of the home will be replaced with “real stucco,” an acrylic material, and will have a less textured finish. The applicant will also be replacing 2 side yard doors with windows. Primary Issues: The existing garage will be torn down and replaced with the proposed detached garage. The rear yard addition will not be visible from the public street and therefore is not required to be reviewed with the Certificate of Appropriateness. The existing stucco on the house will be removed and replaced with “real stucco,” an acrylic material, and will have a less textured finish. The applicant is also proposing to replace two existing side doors with windows. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel’s Comments: The existing garage is not historically significant. Based on the plans presented, the proposed new garage meets the design guidelines in the district plan of treatment and should enhance the overall historic character of the property. Mr. Vogel added that the City does not require COAs for exterior remodeling unless the project involves substantial demolition or alteration of a property’s distinguishing architectural characteristics. Based on the plans presented, the proposed exterior remodeling appears to maintain the historic character of the house with minimal changes; no historically important architectural character defining features will be removed and all of the essential elements of the façade will be retained. The proposed two-story addition is placed on a secondary elevation and appears to be architecturally compatible with the design, size, scale, proportions and materials of the 1924 house. Staff Recommendation & Findings: Staff concurs with Consultant Vogel’s evaluation of the proposed plans for the new detached garage, also recommending approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request. Findings supporting the recommendation include: The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed projects. The proposed detached garage is consistent in size, scale, massing, and material with other new detached garages approved through the COA process in the District. The proposed garage would not detract with the historic character of the house. The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Conditions for approval: The plans presented Placement of a year built plaque on the exterior of the new detached garage. Deadline for City Action: March 13, 2018 4518 Drexel - The Mediterranean (Spanish Colonial Revival) w.b. builders is proposing a whole house remodel to include the following: While preserving the integrity and curb appeal of this entire home, we are proposing the following maintenance type updates to its classic historic architecture. NEW GARAGE: To build a new detached garage that will similarly match the style and feel of the existing garage. This completely new detached garage will be ﬁnished with “real stucco” an acrylic less textured look and feel that provides the same historic presence. Barrel roof tile accents to compliment the shallow pitched roof. The new garage will be accompanied with a new concrete driveway installed to the front yard sidewalk. HOME REMODEL: To remove and replace the exterior stucco with “real stucco,” an acrylic, less textured look and feel that provides the same historic presence. Installation of all new windows & doors to match existing grid and style throughout the house. A rear yard, 2 story, addition for the new Family Room, Kitchen, and Mud Room will share similar Mediterranean style architecture. The 2nd ﬂoor Master Suite will feature the same low pitched barrel roof tile and ﬂat balconets to compliment its true period style. We are replacing 2 side yard doors with windows: 1) the 2nd ﬂoor (SE corner) bedroom side door with a window and 2) the main ﬂoor (North side) driveway side entry and stoop with a window. Our updated home and its improvements will ensure its existence over the next 100 years while enhancing the neighborhood’s historic presence. CRAFT ROOM001REC ROOM002BEDROOM003BATH005CLOSET004LAUNDRY/MECHANICAL006EGRESS29' - 3 1/2"8"4 1/2"14' - 11"3 1/2"4' - 4 1/2"3 1/2"7' - 4"4 1/2"8"5' - 11 1/2"3 1/2"7' - 2"4 1/2"8"14' - 9 1/2"EGRESS3 1/2"13' - 4 1/2"4 1/2"8"005A003A004A006A001A006BE9E81' - 6"2' - 11"5' - 3 1/2" R.O.3' - 9"9"2' - 11" R.O.1' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 1"STORAGE007S12S137' - 6"6' - 4"NNoo..RRoooomm NNaammeeRRmm##TypeUnit SizeNNootteess//RReemmaarrkkss001A003ABedroom003Width x HeightDOOR SCHEDULE005ABath005Mechanical/Storage001004ACloset004006ALaundry/Storage006006BLaundry/Storage006E2E3E4No.Frame Size WxHPella Window #Notes / RemarksE1WINDOW SCHEDULE3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella1' -8" X 2' -8 1/2"Existing (Missing on Pella List)2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/Pella2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaE5E61' -3" X 3' -8"E72' -7" X 4' 1 1/2"Custom/PellaE8E93' -2 1/2" X 1' -0"ExistingExisting2' -7 3/4" X 1' -0"Existing (Missing on Pella List)4' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"E10E114' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"Custom/PellaCustom/PellaS1S2S3S4S52' -5" X 3' -11"S6S72' -5" X 3' -11"5' -6 1/2" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"S83' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/Pella3757375745574557Custom/Pella29472947S93' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/PellaS103' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS113' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS122' -11" X 3' -3"3541S135' -4" X 3' -3"2925 2WEgressEgress3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"ScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, ArchitectsAs indicatedA101Lower Level PlanKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18NMKBRevisions DateIssued for Review 12.27.2017 1/4" = 1'-0"1Lower Level Plan UPDNDNDN1A301MUD108PANTRY107R29' - 6 1/2"15' - 0"ENTRY101LIVING102OFFICE103DINING104P.R.110FAMILY105KITCHEN1061' - 7 1/2"2' - 9 1/2"2' - 9 1/2"7' - 2 1/2"5 1/2"28' - 7 1/2"5 1/2"2' - 1"11' - 8" R.O.2' - 7"6' - 4" R.O.6' - 9 1/2"3 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"10"7' - 10"DWOBARPATIOBOOKSBOOKS6' - 0 1/2"3 1/2"2' - 1"6' - 11 1/2"3 1/2"21' - 2"5 1/2"6' - 9" R.O.101A103A109B108AW3S8107AHALL109109A110A1' - 5"1' - 2"3' - 1" R.O.11"5' - 0"11"3' - 1" R.O.8 1/2"E4N3N4S6S7S10S11E5 E6E7E8E9S9W5W46' - 4"7' - 6"NNoo..RRoooomm NNaammeeRRmm##TypeUnit SizeNNootteess//RReemmaarrkkss101A103AOffice103Width x HeightDOOR SCHEDULE108AMud108Entry101107APantry107109AHall109110A109BHall109P.R.110N1N22' -10" X 4' -7 1/2"Custom/PellaN3N4E2E3E4No.Frame Size WxHPella Window #Notes / RemarksE1WINDOW SCHEDULE2' -11" X 3' -5"2' -11" X 3' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella4' -0" X 3' 9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella1' -8" X 2' -8 1/2"Existing (Missing on Pella List)2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/Pella2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaE5E61' -3" X 3' -8"E72' -7" X 4' 1 1/2"Custom/PellaE8E93' -2 1/2" X 1' -0"ExistingExisting2' -7 3/4" X 1' -0"Existing (Missing on Pella List)3541 4W 4' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"E10E114' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"Custom/PellaCustom/PellaS1S2S3S4S5W1W2W32' -5" X 3' -11"S6S72' -5" X 3' -11"5' -6 1/2" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"2' -10" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -1" X 3' -2"2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"S83' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/Pella3757375745574557Custom/Pella29472947Custom/PellaCustom/Pella3757 3WS93' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/PellaS103' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS113' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS122' -11" X 3' -3"3541S135' -4" X 3' -3"2925 2WW4W511' -8 7/8" X 6' -10"EgressEgressEgressCustom/Pella3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"Custom/PellaScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, ArchitectsAs indicatedA102Main Level PlanKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18NMKBRevisions DateIssued for Review 12/27/2017 1/4" = 1'-0"1Main Level Plan DNDNDN1A301MASTER BEDROOM204MASTER HALL210MASTER BATH209MASTER CLOSET205CLOSET206BEDROOM202BATH201STORAGE207HALL20818' - 6"BEDROOM2035' - 9 1/2"5 1/2"7' - 10"15' - 0"1' - 3"2' - 5" R.O.7' - 11"2' - 5" R.O.10"7' - 2 1/2"15' - 0"18' - 11" VERIFY13' - 1"3 1/2"2' - 2"3 1/2"8' - 2 1/2"5' - 0 1/2"3 1/2"4' - 4 1/2"3 1/2"4' - 2"12' - 10" R.O.5 1/2"3' - 11 1/2"9' - 8" R.O.3' - 11 1/2"5 1/2"W1S31W2203BS3202B201A202A208B208A203A210A205A209AS2S4S5E2E3N1E1N210"NNoo..RRoooomm NNaammeeRRmm##TypeUnit SizeNNootteess//RReemmaarrkkss201A202ABedroom202Width x HeightDOOR SCHEDULE203ABedroom203Bath201202BBedroom202203BBedroom203205AMaster Closet205208AStorage208208BStorage208209AMaster Bath209210AMaster Hall210N1N22' -10" X 4' -7 1/2"Custom/PellaN3N4E2E3E4No.Frame Size WxHPella Window #Notes / RemarksE1WINDOW SCHEDULE2' -11" X 3' -5"2' -11" X 3' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella4' -0" X 3' 9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella1' -8" X 2' -8 1/2"Existing (Missing on Pella List)2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/Pella2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaE5E61' -3" X 3' -8"E72' -7" X 4' 1 1/2"Custom/PellaE8E93' -2 1/2" X 1' -0"ExistingExisting2' -7 3/4" X 1' -0"Existing (Missing on Pella List)3541 4W 4' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"E10E114' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"Custom/PellaCustom/PellaS1S2S3S4S5W1W2W32' -5" X 3' -11"S6S72' -5" X 3' -11"5' -6 1/2" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"2' -10" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -1" X 3' -2"2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"S83' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/Pella3757375745574557Custom/Pella29472947Custom/PellaCustom/Pella3757 3WS93' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/PellaS103' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS113' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS122' -11" X 3' -3"3541S135' -4" X 3' -3"2925 2WW4W511' -8 7/8" X 6' -10"EgressEgressEgressCustom/Pella3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"Custom/Pella201A202A208B203A210AW/D201A202A208B203A210AW/DScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, ArchitectsAs indicatedA103Upper Level PlanKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18NMKBRevisions DateIssued for Review 12.27.2017 1/4" = 1'-0"1Upper Level Plan 1/4" = 1'-0"2Upper Level Plan - Option 1 1/4" = 1'-0"3Upper Level Plan - Option 2 Main Level Plan902' - 2 1/2"Upper Level Plan911' - 7"Upper Level Ceiling919' - 7"Lower Level Ceiling901' - 4"Main Level Ceiling910' - 8 1/2"E6E7E2E3E4E8E9E10E11E5E1Main Level Plan902' - 2 1/2"Upper Level Plan911' - 7"Upper Level Ceiling919' - 7"Lower Level Ceiling901' - 4"Main Level Ceiling910' - 8 1/2"N1N3N4N2N1N22' -10" X 4' -7 1/2"Custom/PellaN3N4E2E3E4No.Frame Size WxHPella Window #Notes / RemarksE1WINDOW SCHEDULE2' -11" X 3' -5"2' -11" X 3' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella4' -0" X 3' 9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella3' -11 1/2" X 4' -9 1/2"Custom/Pella1' -8" X 2' -8 1/2"Existing (Missing on Pella List)2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/Pella2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaE5E61' -3" X 3' -8"E72' -7" X 4' 1 1/2"Custom/PellaE8E93' -2 1/2" X 1' -0"ExistingExisting2' -7 3/4" X 1' -0"Existing (Missing on Pella List)3541 4W 4' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"E10E114' -3 1/2" X 7' -2"Custom/PellaCustom/PellaScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, ArchitectsAs indicatedA201Exterior ElevationsKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18NMKBRevisions DateIssue for Review 12.27.2017 1/4" = 1'-0"2East 1/4" = 1'-0"1North Lower Level Plan894' - 3"Main Level Plan902' - 2 1/2"Upper Level Plan911' - 7"Upper Level Ceiling919' - 7"Lower Level Ceiling901' - 4"Main Level Ceiling910' - 8 1/2"S3S8S2S4 S5S6S7S10S12S13S9S11S1Main Level Plan902' - 2 1/2"Upper Level Plan911' - 7"Upper Level Ceiling919' - 7"Lower Level Ceiling901' - 4"Main Level Ceiling910' - 8 1/2"W1W2W3W5W4S1S2S3S4S5W1W2W32' -5" X 3' -11"S6S7No.Frame Size WxHPella Window #Notes / RemarksWINDOW SCHEDULE2' -5" X 3' -11"5' -6 1/2" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"2' -10" X 4' -7 1/2"3' -1" X 3' -2"2' -10 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"S83' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/Pella3757375745574557Custom/Pella29472947Custom/PellaCustom/Pella3757 3WS93' -1" X 4' 7 1/2"Custom/PellaS103' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS113' -7 1/2" X 7' -1 1/2"Custom/PellaS122' -11" X 3' -3"3541S135' -4" X 3' -3"2925 2WW4W511' -8 7/8" X 6' -10"EgressEgressEgressCustom/Pella3' -9" X 4' -9"3' -1" X 4' -9"Custom/PellaScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, ArchitectsAs indicatedA202Exterior ElevationsKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18NMKBRevisions DateIssued for Review 12.27.2017 1/4" = 1'-0"1South 1/4" = 1'-0"2West Lower Level Plan894' - 3"Main Level Plan902' - 2 1/2"Upper Level Plan911' - 7"Upper Level Ceiling919' - 7"Lower Level Ceiling901' - 4"Main Level Ceiling910' - 8 1/2"8' - 0"8' - 6"ScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, Architects 1/2" = 1'-0"A301Building SectionKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18NMKB 1/2" = 1'-0"1East/West Section Through Family/Kitchen Garage Level899' - 2 1/2"Garage Ceiling909' - 2 1/2"Height of GarageParapet911' - 8 1/2"Garage Level899' - 2 1/2"Garage Ceiling909' - 2 1/2"Height of GarageParapet911' - 8 1/2"Garage Level899' - 2 1/2"Garage Ceiling909' - 2 1/2"Height of GarageParapet911' - 8 1/2"Garage Level899' - 2 1/2"Garage Ceiling909' - 2 1/2"Height of GarageParapet911' - 8 1/2"Garage Level899' - 2 1/2"Garage Ceiling909' - 2 1/2"Height of GarageParapet911' - 8 1/2"Garage Level899' - 2 1/2"Garage Ceiling909' - 2 1/2"Height of GarageParapet911' - 8 1/2"6A5007A50022' - 0"26' - 0"4' - 9 1/2"18' - 0 1/2" R.O.3' - 0"ScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, ArchitectsAs indicatedA500Garage Plans,Elevations & SectionsKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18DPWKB 1/4" = 1'-0"2East Elevation of Garage 1/4" = 1'-0"3North Elevation of Garage 1/4" = 1'-0"5South Elevation of Garage 1/4" = 1'-0"4West Elevation of Garage 1/2" = 1'-0"6East/West Section Through Garage 1/2" = 1'-0"7North/South Section Through Garage 1/4" = 1'-0"1Garage Level CRAFT ROOM001REC ROOM002BEDROOM003BATH005CLOSET004LAUNDRY/MECHANICAL006EGRESSEGRESS001ASTORAGE0078" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL WITH #4'S @ 16" O.C. VERTICAL AND #4'S HORIZONTAL @ 24" O.C., MIN. (OFFSET TO INSIDE FACE, TYP.) W1P1GROUT TOP 2 COURSES BY 2'-0" WIDE SOLID AT BEARING LOCATION, MIN.J1...B7(2) 2X10'S (FLUSH)B7B7F120"x8" CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING WITH(2) #4'S CONTINUOUS, MIN.J1W1F1U.N.O.U.N.O.P1P15.7 4.6 9.19.1P1VERIFY EXISTING CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING2'-0" WIDE X 8" THICH, MIN.(BASED ON 2,000 PSF SOIL).11ScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, Architects 1/4" = 1'-0"S101Lower LevelStructural PlanKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18DPWKB 1/4" = 1'-0"1Lower Level Structural Plan UPDNDNDNMUD108PANTRY107ENTRY101LIVING102OFFICE103DINING104P.R.110FAMILY105KITCHEN106BOOKSBOOKSHALL1092J/1KJ12X10'S @ 16" O.C. (HEM-FIR #1 AND BETTER) OR EQUALJ211 7/8" TJI 110'S @ 16" O.C.J1J2J1B1(2) 2X8 [1J/1K]B1B1B2(2) 1 3/4" X 9 1/4" 1.8 E. LVL'SB2B4(2) 1 3/4" X 9 1/2" 2.0 E. LVL'SB4B5(3) 1 3/4" X 11 7/8" 2.0 E. LVL'SB5B52J/1K 3J3J3J3J/3K3J/3K 2J/2K 2J/2KB6(2) 1 3/4" X 14" 1.8 E. LVL'S ORW8X18 STEEL BEAMB6ScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, Architects 1/4" = 1'-0"S102Main Level StructuralPlanKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18DPWKB 1/4" = 1'-0"1Main Level Structural Plan DNMASTER BEDROOM204MASTER HALL210MASTER BATH209MASTER CLOSET205CLOSET206BEDROOM202BATH201STORAGE207HALL208BEDROOM203205AT1ROOF TRUSSES @ 2'-0" O.C.B1(2) 2X8 [1J/1K]B2(2) 1 3/4" X 9 1/4" 1.8 E. LVL'SB3(2) 1 3/4" X 11 7/8" 1.8 E. LVL'S [2J/2K]T1T1B2B1B1B1B3G.T.ScaleProject ArchitectDateDrawn byChecked by5100 Edina Industrial Blvd Suite # 201Edina, MN 55439952.426.1932www.kurtbaumassociates.comKurt Baum & Associates, Architects 1/4" = 1'-0"S103Upper LevelStructural PlanKBHarmel Residence4518 Drexel Ave, Edina MN1.24.18DPWKB 1/4" = 1'-0"1Upper Level Structural Plan S1Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-796417917 Highway No. 7Web: www.advsur.comCLIENT/JOB ADDRESSSHEET TITLESHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 2DWG ORIENTATION SCALEDRAWING NUMBERDATE SURVEYED:JANUARY 17, 2018DATE DRAFTED:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lot 10, Block 6, Country Club District Fairway Section, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of ourservices does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legaldescription with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it iscorrect and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey havebeen shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property.4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.5.Showing and tabulating building coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of suchgovernmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctlyshown before proceeding with construction.6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site.We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site.The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark andcheck at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this siteor before beginning construction.7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existingeasements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, thissurvey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.8.While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposedplans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements andproposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, weare not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officialsin this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may havejurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction orplanning improvements to the property.STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:"භ" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted.OCTOBER 25, 2017DATE SURVEYED:# 52716LICENSE NO.Joshua S. RinkeDATEJANUARY 17, 2018SURVEYED BY:ADVANCED SURV.& ENGINEERING, CO.40'20'0GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES:BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGINxInstall silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of theconstruction area.xSediment control measures must remain in place until finalstabilization has been established and then shall be removed.Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short termconstruction activity but must be replaced before the next rain.xA temporary rock construction entrance shall be established ateach access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inchrock extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site andshall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. Theentrance shall be maintained during construction by topdressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sedimentsonto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that arenot so protected shall be closed by fencing to preventunprotected exit from the site.xContractor shall install inlet protection on all existing stormsewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inletprotection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewerinlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inletprotection must be installed in a manner that will not impoundwater for extended periods of time or in a manner that presentsa hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic.DURING CONSTRUCTION:xWhen dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of siltfence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment ladenrunoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain inplace for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded withMinnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.xA dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal ofconstruction debris. These dumpsters shall be servicedregularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacentproperties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall inaccordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agencyrequirements.xA separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardouswaste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordancewith MPCA requirements.xConcrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch shownRQWKLVSODQIRU³&:´DQGGLVSRVHRIZDVKLQJVDVVROLGZDVWHxSediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and aftermajor rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired asnecessary to provide downstream protection.xStreets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and iflitter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed.xIf necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall becleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areasxMoisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust asneeded.xPortable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use byworkers and shall be properly maintained.xIf it becomes necessary to pump the excavation duringconstruction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas sothat the double silt fence around these areas can filter the waterbefore it leaves the site.xTemporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist ofbroadcast seeding with Minnesota Department ofTransportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed bycovering with spray mulch.xErosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan arethe absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporaryearth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencingas deemed necessary to control erosion.SITE WORK COMPLETION:xWhen final grading has been completed but before placementRIVHHGRUVRGDQ³DVEXLOW´VXUYH\VKDOOEHGRQHSHU City ofEdina requirements to insure that grading was properly done.xWhen any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seedingshall be completed including any erosion control blankets forsteep areas.xWhen turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection andother erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacentstreets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver asite that is erosion resistant and clean.xContractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2%slope away from proposed building.PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGEHOUSE 1,673 SQ. FT.GARAGE 572 SQ. FT.PATIO 146 SQ. FT.PATIO CREDIT -146 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING 2,245 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 8,433 SQ. FT.BUILDING COVERAGE 26.6%SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGEHOUSE 1,455 SQ. FT.GARAGE 404 SQ. FT.DECK 404 SQ. FT.DECK/PATIO CREDIT -150 SQ. FT.TOTAL EXISTING BUILDINGS 2,113 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 8,433 SQ. FT.BUILDING COVERAGE 25.1%EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGEHOUSE 1,455 SQ. FT.GARAGE 404 SQ. FT.DECK 404 SQ. FT.SIDEWALK/STOOPS 231 SQ. FT.DRIVEWAY 1,368 SQ. FT.TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 3,862 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 8,433 SQ. FT.BUILDING COVERAGE 45.8%PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGEHOUSE 1,673 SQ. FT.GARAGE 572 SQ. FT.PATIO 146 SQ. FT.SIDEWALK/STOOPS 239 SQ. FT.DRIVEWAY 1,506 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 4,136 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 8,433 SQ. FT.BUILDING COVERAGE 49.0% 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Commission Instructions WORK OBJECTIVES Commissions are being asked to: 1. Review and analyze policies and goals outlined in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan to determine their current relevancy 2. Identify which existing 2008 policies and goals should be: a. eliminated or retained b. retained and modified c. completely re-written or d. created for inclusion in a current chapter and/or new chapter 3. Engage with other commissions a. identify overlapping topics/issues b. work together to determine relevancy of each other goals and policies c. assist with writing additional goals and policies 4. Make recommendations to policies, goals and/or the addition of content a. Commissions will meet report on recommendations at a Planning Commission work session. b. Schedule: March 28 Heritage Preservation Commission (5:30pm) Transportation Commission (5:50pm) Energy and Environment Commission (6:15pm) April 11 Parks and Recreation Commission (5:30pm) Arts and Culture Commission (6:15pm) April 25 Community Health Commission (5:30pm) Human Rights and Relations Commission (6:15pm) 5. Final Commission Review and Comment a. Each commission will review a draft of the 2018 Comprehensive plan and provide final comments back to the Planning Commission. b. Expected timeline: July 2018 INSTRUCTIONS & TIMELINE October 2017 A 2008 Comprehensive Plan chapter(s) will be given to the Commission whose work is most closely related. For example, members of the Edina Transportation Commission will receive the Transportation Chapter from the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Objective 1 November 2017 Commissions will discuss their chapter(s), giving attention to goals and policies at the conclusion of each chapter to determine their current relevancy. It is anticipated that the discussions will include critical evaluations of the goals and policies using the following considerations and documents: Changes that have taken place since the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Examples of changes include: Economy, Environment, Demographics, Housing, etc. Vision Edina 2015 and Big Ideas Report (2017) Commissions should review chapters through the eight Vision Edina strategic focus area lenses. Additional Edina Guiding Documents Chamber of Commerce – Economic Development/Stakeholder Engagement Analysis (January 2017) Quality of Life Survey (August 2017) Living Streets Plan (2015) Affordable Housing Policy (2015) Parks, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan (2015) Metropolitan Council System Statement for the City of Edina (2015) Objective 1 November 2017 Determine if the goals and policies outlined in 2008’s Comprehensive Plan should be: eliminated or retained retained and modified completely re-written or created for inclusion in a current chapter and/or new chapter Objective 2 Dec 2017/ Jan 2018 Engage with other to discuss overlapping issues and assist with writing appropriate goals and policies. Objective 3 Jan/Feb 2018 Complete work objectives Objective 1,2,3 March 2018 Make recommendations to policies, goals and/or the addition of content Commissions will present recommendations to the Planning Commission at March work sessions. Objective 4 July 2018 Review and Comment on draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan Objective 5 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHAPTERS A Commission will be provided a chapter(s) as the lead reviewer. This does not mean Commission’s cannot provide input on other chapters AND there may be cases when a Commission creates content that might be better served by its own chapter. The 2008 chapters includes: Land use Transportation Housing Water Resources Parks Health Heritage Preservation Sustainability Community Facilities and Services Chapter Responsibility Chart: We will look to Commissions for input on chapters most closely related to the goals and missions of the Commission. The chart designates the chapter or chapters your commission will be asked to focus on. Chapter Title Commission(s) Community Profile Human Rights and Relations Commission Community Health Commission Landuse & Community Design Planning Commission Housing Human Rights and Relations Commission Heritage Preservation Heritage Preservation Commission Transportation Transportation Commission Water Resources Management Energy and Environment Commission Parks, Open Space and Natural Resources Parks and Recreation Commission Arts and Culture Commission Energy, Environment, and Resilience* Energy and Environment Commission Community Services and Facilities Parks and Recreation Commission Community Health Commission Human Rights and Relations Commission Arts and Culture Comprehensive Plan: Chapter Assessment ToolChapter Title: Heritage PreservationCommission Name: Heritage Preservation Commission1Adopt a Heritage Preservation Plan.2Integrate heritage preservation planning with other city planning for community development. 3The City will develop strategies and establish priorities for the restoration and rehabilitation of City-owned heritage resources. 4Participate in the federal-state-local government heritage preservation partnership. aThe City Council will adopt and maintain a Heritage Preservation Plan as part of the city's Comprehensive Plan.bAll preservation program activities will be carried out in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.cThe City will use the Hertiage Preservation Plan to establish policies, procedures, and plans for managing the preservation, protection, and use of significant heritage resources. dThe HPB will conduct research to augment, refine, and revise the thematic study units outlined in the 1999 historic context study. The Heritage Preservation Plan will establish local historic contexts and the Heritage Preservation Commission will undertake research to revise and update these study units. eHeritage preservation planning will be integrated with other city planning for community development. [See planning goals.]fThe City will provide the HPC with the resources needed to prepare and implement the comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan. gBecause comprehensive planning is a continuous cycle, the HPC will periodically review and update the Heritatge Preservation Plan. hThe City will continue to participate in the Certified Local Government (CLG) program and cooperate with neighboring cities in other communities in developing their heritage preservation plans. 1Identify significant heritage resources worthy of consideration in community planning. aThe HPC will carry out a comprehensive survey of heritage resources within the City limits and maintain and inventory of all properties recorded. bThe City will create heritage resources survey plans that advance the goals and priorities of the historic contexts. The HPC will establish survey goals and priorities based on historic contexts. cAll of the information gathered on each property surveyed will be placed in the permanent records of the Heritage Preservation Board. The results of the surveys will be systematically gathered, recorded, and made available to those responsible for heritage preservation planning. d Update the information in the heritage resources inventory and convert it to electronic form so that it can be manipulated, used, and retrieved quickly. In addition, the inventory should be made adaptable for Geographic Information System (GIS) users. Provide greater access to the information generated by the heritage resources survey by investing in the techological infrastructure that will bring the informaiton to all users who obtain information through the Internet. eMake the heritage resources inventory data adaptable for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) users and map the location of heritage resouces and their relationship to other layers of information. fAll surveys will be prepared by personnel who meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (or other applicable qualification standards) with in their professional field. Program Area III: Evaluation of Heritage ResourcesGoalsPoliciesGoalsPoliciesProgram Area I: Preservation PlanningProgram Area II: Identification of Heritage ResourcesGoals 1The HPB will evaluate all properties identified by the ongoing Heritage Resouces Survey and issue a finding of significance for those properties that meet defined crieteria. All heritage resources identified by survey will be evaluated for heritage landmakr eligibility using established criteria applied within historic contexts. 2The HPC will maintain an accurate up-to-date inventory and map depicting the heritage resources evaluated as significant, including all properties designated or determined eligible as heritage landmarks. aFor each property evaluated as eligible for heritage landmark designation the HPC will issue a finding of significance with a report documenting its location, ownership, date of consctruction, the relevant historic context and property type, and the criteria on which the finding of significance was based. bHPC determinations of landmark eligibility may be provisional and it may be necessary for the HPC to conduct additional studies prior to initiating the landmark nomination process. 1Significant heritage resources will be rezoned as designated Edina Heritage Landmarks or Landmark Districts. aThe HPC will norminate historic properties and districts for designation as Heritage Landmarks or Landmark Districts by the City Council. bA landmark nomination study will be completed for each property nominated; the nomination study will located and identify the subject property, explain how it meets one or more of the landmark eligibilty criteria, and make the case for historic significance and integrity. cEach landmark nomination study will include a Plan of Treatment that will develop recommend property-specific approaches to design review and treatment. dExcept in extraordinanry circumstances, the HPC will not conimate a property for landmark designation without the consent of the owner. eThe City may, upon recommendation by the HPC, nominate properties for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 1 Protect Heritage Landmarks and Landmark Designation Districts through design review and compliance with heritage preservation standards. 2Carry out public facilities maintenance and construction projects in such a manner that significant heritage preservation resources are preserved and protected. 3 Encourage voluntary compliance with historic preservation treatment standards. aThe City will take all necessary steps to ensure that no significant heritage preservation resources is destroyed or damaged as a result of any project for which a Certificate of Appropriateness has been issued by the HPC. bThe City will cooperate develop partnerships with property owners in to developing plans for their properties, advise them about approaches used in similar preservation projects, and provide technical assistance in historic property rehabilitation and restoration treatments. cThe HPC will work with the Planning Commission and other citizen advisory boards and commisisons to ensure that heritage resource management issues are taken into account in planning for residential, commercial, and industrial development projects. dEvery application for a preliminary plat, rezoning, conditional use permit, or variance from the zoning code that may affect an Edina Herigate Landmark or Landmark District will be reviewed by the HPC, which will advise the Planning Commission whether or not the requested action will have an adverse effect on a significant heritage preservation resource. eWhen demolition or site destruction cannot be avoided, careful consideration will be given to mitigating the loss by moving the affected Edina Heritage Landmark/Heritage Preservation Resources, Landmark District or Historic Building heritage resource to another location, recording it prior to demolition, or by salvaging architectural elements or archaeological data for reuse or curation. PoliciesProgram Area IV: Designation of Heritage LandmarksGoalsPoliciesProgram Area V: Design Review and Compliance GoalsPolicies fIn cases involving permits that are not subject to design review, a reasonable effort will be made to preserve and protect important historical, architectural, archaeological, and cultural features. gThe HPC and its staff will work with the city manager, city engineer, community development director, and others to ensure that Edina Heritage Landmarks/Heritage Preservation Resources/Landmark District or Historic Buildings heritage preservation resources are taken into account in project planning. hThe HPC and its staff will review voluntary requests for design review of work that would not ordinarily be subject to regulation under the heritage preservation ordinance and issue Certificates of Appropriateness for projects that meet preservation treatment standards. iThe City will consider development of financial incentives for the preservation, rehabilitation, and adaptive use of heritage resources, such as including but not limited to tax incentives, grants, loans, easements, and subsidies. jThe HPC and its staff will help project planners identify the historical, cultural, aesthetic and visual relationships between heritage landmarks and their surroundings. 1The City will Provide the public with information on about heritage preservation resources and public history education activities. in the city. aThe HPC will design and maintain a high-quality heritage preservation page on the City's website. bThe City HPC will develop facilities and programs that interpret heritage resources for the public. cThe HPC will make a special effort to reach out to and involve partner with the Edina Historical Society, neighborhood groups, and other community organizations with shared particular interests in the preservation, protection, and use of historic properties or community development to develop effective public education and outreach programs. dAll current heritage resource survey reports and other studies carried out under the auspices of the HPC will be published or made available to the public through other appropriate media surch as the City's website.***New language is underlined; text found in the 2008 plan that should be deleted is indicated by strikethrough***PoliciesProgram Area VI: Public Education and OutreachGoals PRESERVE MINNESOTA Annual Conference Call for Session Proposals Proposals Due: April 6, 2018 Location: Winona Meeting Dates: September 12-14, 2018 The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is currently accepting proposals for speaker sessions for Preserve Minnesota, the 2018 Annual Statewide Historic Preservation Conference. The conference will take place in Winona, Minnesota from Wednesday, September 12 to Friday, September 14, 2018. Sessions should highlight topics related to Minnesota preservation, archaeology, history, architectural history, preservation planning, heritage tourism, sustainability, advocacy, incentives for preservation, and other related topics. The conference planning committee is interested in sessions that are relevant to the broader issues facing the preservation community, will stimulate and engage the audience, present new and fresh approaches, and can be applied to a range of attendees from across Minnesota. Proposals must include the following six parts. Please prepare and submit them via email as a Word document. 1. Title: Provide a title that will capture the audience’s attention. 2. Summary: In 250 words or less, describe what the session will be about. This statement will allow the planning committee to understand what is to be achieved and why it is important. 3. Learning Objectives: Specify three learning objectives that will be fulfilled for those who attend your session. Having these will further allow the planning committee to understand your proposal, and will assist in having the session considered for continuing education credits from the American Institute of Architects, and/or the American Planning Association/American Institute of Certified Planners. 4. Topic Statement: The Topic Statement of 50 words or less becomes the description in the conference program; it succinctly states what is being presented. 5. Speaker Contact Information: For each speaker, provide: • Name as it would appear in the conference program • Title • Affiliation • Mailing Address • Phone • Email • For a panel, note who is the best to contact with questions 6. Biography: In 150 words or less, describe each speaker’s education, background, relevant experience, role in the project, etc. Deadline: Friday, April 6, 2018 Please submit your proposal to Michael Koop, Certified Local Government Coordinator at the Minnesota SHPO by email: NOTE: Because SHPO is moving on Feb. 26-28 to a new home at the Minnesota Department of Administration, you will need to email your proposal to one of two addresses: If submitting before March 1, 2018, send to michael.koop@mnhs.org If submitting on or after March 1, 2018, send to michael.koop@state.mn.us If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Michael Koop by email or by phone: 651.259.3452