HomeMy WebLinkAbout19870803_regularI
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
AUGUST 3, 1987
472
a* Tirp
Answering rollcall were Members Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED.
Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by
Rollcall :
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 20 AND THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 27,
1987 APPROVED.
approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 20 and the Special
Meeting of July 27, 1987.
*FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BUILDING EXPANSION - CINEPLEX ODEON CORPORATION (EDINA i
THEATRE) CONTINUED TO 9/14/87.
Member Turner to continue the public hearing on Final Development Plan for
September 14, 1987,
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by I I
I
Building Expansion of Cineplex Odeon Corporation (Edina Theatre) to the meeting of i
! Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
REPORT GIVEN ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
attention to information provided by Planner Craig Larsen to aid the Council in
their review of the Comprehensive Plan.
density, medium density, and high density residential from the Plan.
designation was then related to the appropriate Zoning District for which density
ranges are provided. Also included were the multi-unit projects and their actual
density which the Council has approved since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in
1980. Mayor Courtney commented that there seemed to be some inconsistencies
between the allowed units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan and the allowed units
per acre in the Zoning Ordinance.
projects approved since adoption of the Plan seem to be in the mid-range of the
density allowances in the Zoning Ordinance. In some cases the proponents asked
for the maximum units per acre but the approval granted was more in the middle
range,
into account many properties in the City that were already zoned and developed.
The goal was .to not make them non-conforming by adoption of the Zoning Ordinance
and this resulted in the density ranges contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr.
Hughes added that the range of densities allowed in the Zoning Ordinance are
firmed up by a schedule of allowances contained in the Ordinance (i.e. underground
parking, reduced lot coverage, spacing, distance to freeway interchange). Under
the present Zoning Ordinance a developer can earn increased density through better
construction and locating structures as far as they can from other residential
buildings. Member Smith referred to the ComDrehensive Plan definition for medium
Manager Rosland directed the Council's
The .report listed definitions of low 1
Each
1
I
Assistant Manager Hughes responded that the
I . He said that when the Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1984 we had to take
density-residential and suggested that similir language be drafted for the
definition for high density residential and brought back for the Council's review
and decision on changes to the definitions.
in definitions should be sent to the Community Development and Planning Commission
to be heard as the same time they consider the land use designation changes which
the Council has suggested. No formal action was taken.
CDBG PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY APPROVED.
that the City of Edina and 42 other Hennepin County communities jointly receive
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds through Hennepin County. Edina's
participation is made possible by a Joint Cooperation Agreement with the county.
The existing agreement expires October 1, 1987.
provides federal funds for local community development activities it is necessary
to execute a new agreement to cover the next three years.
formatting, there are only a few changes from the Joint Cooperation Agreement in
effect since 1984.
limiting the number of activities to three per community per year and each to a
minimum of $7,500 (exceptions are joint activities and instances where the
planning allocation is less than $7,500).
provision for crediting program income back to the community from which it
The Council agreed that any changes
Manager Rosland advised
To continue the program which
Othe? than some
One is the inclusion of the current administrative policy
The new agreement also includes a new
i
1
!
I'
I
I
originates for reprogramming to eligible and fundable activities.
recommend execution of the agreement.
activities per community per year would affect any program the City is now
running. Assistant Manager Hughes said staff did not feel it would eliminate any
basic programs such as handicapped accessibility, housing rehabilitation and land
acquisition programs.
existing multi-city program and would be exempt.
that Hennepin County for administrative purposes is using the three activity limit
as a way to encourage cities to sponsor joint programs,like the H.O.M.E. program,
instead of having each of the individual cities running small programs.
Richards moved adoption of the following resolution:
Staff would
Member Turner asked if the limit of three
1 The H.O.M.E. program would still qualify as it is an
He said his understanding was
Member
8/3/87
473
rc
c/)
u-) 7z
5 m
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute on behalf of the City the
Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County to continue the Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant Program for federal fiscal years 1988,
1989 and 1990.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted .
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 2. BLOCK I. CONN HEIGHTS. Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
RESOLUTION
Parcel A: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Conn Heights, Lying easterly
of the line described as follows:
of Lot 3, Block 1, Conn Heights thence easterly to the southeast
corner thereof, the actual point of beginning, thence deflecting
right 135 00' to the southerly line of Lot 1, there terminating; and
Parcel B; Lot 2, Block 1, Conn Heights;
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels") described as follows :
Parcel A: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Conn Heights, Lying easterly
of the line described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner
of Lot 3, Block 1, Conn Heights thence easterly to the southeast corner
thereof, the actual point of beginning, thence deflecting right 135 00'
to the southerly line of Lot 1, there terminating; except for all that
part of the North 4 feet of Lot 1, lying between the Southerly extension
of the East and West lines of said Lot 2, all in Block 1, Conn Heights;
and
Parcel B: Lot 2, and all that part of the north 4 feet of Lot 1, lying
between the southerly extension of the east and west lines of said Lot 2,
all in Block 1, Conn Heights.
Commencing at the southwest corner
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as'separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*HEARING DATE SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS. Motion was made by Member Smith
and seconded by Member Turner setting August 17, 1987 as hearing date for the
following Planning Matters:
1)
2) Amendment to Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit - To Allow
3)
Preliminary Plat Approval - Rolling Gr'een Parkway Addition - Generally located
west of Rolling Green Parkway and south of Annaway Dr
Retail Sale in Phase I1 Office Building - Edinborough
Final Development Plan - Building Expansion - Thexton Manufacturing Company -
Generally located east of Parklawn Av and north of W. 77th Street
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS HEARD.
their comments. Walt Sandison. 4612 W. 58th Street, congratulated the City's
sewer and water departments for the terrific job they did on Friday following the
flood on Thursday night. Jim Elving. 5601 Blake Road. also congratulated the
water department who responded to a flooded condition at his home.
to proceed in approaching the Council to determine if there is something that can
be done to alleviate the flood potential in this area.: He also asked if Blake Road
was going to be improved.
flooded homes on Leslie Lane and that the last time this had happened was in 1977.
Because that was considered to be a 100 year occurrence, nothing was pursued by
the residents.
through the City Clerk's office requesting the Council to have the City
investigate making improvements to the storm sewer system. A public hearing would
then be held so that the affected residents could determine if they felt it was a
reasonable expenditure. With regard to Blake Road, Mr. Hoffman said it is a State
Aid street and it could be rebuilt to State Aid standards (32 - 36 feet wide).
Mayor Courtney asked residents to present
He asked how
Engineer Hoffman said that he had been in some of the
He explained that the procedure would be to file a petition
8/ 3/87
476
* Northwesterly line of Lot 10 distance 10 feet Northeasterly from most Westerly
comer thereof to the most Southerly corner of said lot; Fractional Lot 11 and
that part of Easterly 10 feet of fractional Lot 12 and that part of fractional
Lot 10 described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 10, then
Northeasterly 10 feet along the Northwesterly line thereof, thence South to
Southwesterly corner thereof, thence North to beginning; Fractional Lot 13 and
that part of Lot 12 lying Westerly of the East 10 feet thereof; Fractional Lots 14
& 15, all in Block 11, BROWNDALE PARK ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Lots 2, 3,
6, 7, Block 2; Lots 1, 2, 5 thru 9, 11 thru 16, Block 3, COLONIAL GROVE 6TH
ADDITION.
including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated; That part of Lot 81 lying South
of the North 130 feet including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated; That part
of Lot 83 lying South of North 174 feet thereof including adjacent 8 feet of Main
Street vacated; That part of Lot 84 lying South of the North 344 feet thereof
including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated; That part of Lot 87 lying South
of North 148 feet and East of the West 20 feet thereof including adjacent 8 feet
of Main Street vacated; That part of Vest 20 feet of Lot 87 and the East 30 feet
of Lot 88 lying South of the North 148 feet thereof including 8 feet Main Street
vacated; East 1/2 of Lot 89 including adjacent 8 feet Main Street vacated; West
1/2 Lot 89 including adjacent 8 feet Main Street vacated; West 50 feet of Lot 90
including adjacent 8 feet Main Street vacated; East 50 feet of Lot 90 including
adjacent 8 feet Main Street vacated; West 1/2 Lot 91 including 8 feet Main Street
vacated; That part of East 1/2 Lot 92 lying S of North 150 feet including adjacent
8 feet Main Street vacated, MORNINGSIDE ADDITION; Lots 14, 15 and 16, MELVIN
GRIMES SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 8, 9, 10, GRIMES HOMESTEAD ADDITION; Northwest 1/2 of
Southeast 200 feet of Lot 11 including adjacent 8 feet Main Street vacated;
Southwest 1/2 of Southeast 200 feet of Lot 11 except street including adjacent 8
feet Main Street vacated; Southeast 163.5 feet of Lot 12 and Southeast 163.5 feet
That part of West 50 feet of Lot 80 lying South of the North 130 feet
of Northeast 15.5 feet of Lot 13 including adjacent 8 feet of West-44th Street
vacated; Southeast 150 feet of Southwest 59.5 feet of Northeast 75 feet of Lot 13
including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated, GRIMES HOMESTEAD ADDITION; Lots
25 and 26 including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated, RILEY'S SUBDIVISION OF
LOTS 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 30 and 31, GRIMES HOMESTEAD ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS IS: $27,779.34
6. TREE REMOVAL ASSESSMENT NO. TR-87.
The area proposed to be assessed for said assessment is as follows: East 165
feet of North 56 feet of South 322 feet of Southeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 except
road, SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 028, RANGE 24; That part of West 215 feet of Lot 41
lying north of a line running East at right angles from a point in West line of
said lot distance 98.89 feet South from center line of County Road No. 39,
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 196; That part of Lot 1 lying West of East 120 feet thof
except road, Block 4, CODES HIGHVIEV PARK ADDITION; Lot 10, Block 3, CREEK VALLEY
ADDITION; Commencing at a point in West line of Southeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4
distance 531.82 feet North of Southwest corner thereof thence North 87 degrees
East 406.15 feet thence South parallel with West line of Southeast 1/4 of
Northwest 1/4 to North line of Edina Highlands Lakeside Addition thence East and
Northeasterly along the Northerly line of said addition to East line of Southeast
I
1/4 of Northwest 1/4 thence North to Northeast corner thereof thence Westerly and
Southwesterly along center line of old road to West line of Southeast 1/4 of
Northwest 1/4 thence South to beginning except road and Hwy, SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP
117, RANGE 21; Lot 3, Block except highway, EDINA RIDGE ADDITION; That part of
Lot 8 lying Easterly of a line commencing at a point in the Southerly line of Lot
8 distance 32.09 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner of said lot and
running Northerly through a point in the West line of Lot 8 distance 81.58 feet
North from said Southwest comer, Block 2, HILLDALE ADDITION; Lot 23, Block 6, LA
BUENA VISTA ADDITION; That part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of a line running from a
point in North line of Lot 2 distance 100 feet East from Northwest corner-thereof
to a point in Southerly line of Lot 2 distance 100 feet Easterly from Southwest , comer thereof, PROSPECT HILLS ADDITION; Lot 33, ROLLING GREEN ADDITION; Lots 1
and 5, Block 1, SMABY ADDITION; Lot 12, Block 10, SOUTH HARRIET PARK ADDITION;
That part of Lot 22 lying West of the Southerly extension of a line running from a
point in North line of Lot 28 distance 84 feet West from Northeast corner thereof
to a point in South line of Lot 24 distance 63 feet West from Southeast corner
thereof, Block 1, also Lot 38, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION; Lot 2,
THIELEN'S BROOKSIDE ADDITION; Lot 7 and that part of Lot 8 lying North of State
Hwy 5, Block 4, TINGDALE BROTHERS BROOKSIDE ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 3, VALLEY
of alley vacated, Block 13, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS ADDITION; Lot 2, Block 1,
WYMA"S SOUTHVIEW 2ND ADDITION; South 50 feet of Lot 37, PORNINGSIDE ADDITION.
I ESTATES ADDITION; North 19 feet of Lot 22 and all of Lot 23 including adjacent1/2 i
'' TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $9,362.50
7. TRAFFIC SIGNAL ASSESSMENT NO. TS-87
The area proposed to be assessed for said assessment is as follows: Bounded
on the IJest by West Shore Drive, on the North by West 66th Street, on the East by
Valley View Road and Lynmar Lane, on the South by Gilford Drive.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS;
i i $45,886.70 I 8. BLACKTOP STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-177
West 59th Street from Wooddale Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue
8/3/87
477
The area proposed to be assessed for said assessment is as follows: Lots 12
thru 14, Block 3; Lots 12 and 13, Block 4; Lots 1 and 24, Block 13; Lots 1 and 24,
Block 14, FAIRFAX ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $11,126.80
9. BLACKTOP, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-261
Westridge Court from Valley View Road to cul-de-sac
The area proposed to be assessed for said assessment is as follows: Lots 1
thru 5, Block 1, COLONIAL COURT ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $11,800.85
10. BLACKTOP, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-263
Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
and 2, 7 and 8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $20,777.68
11. BLACKTOP, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-269
York Avenue from West 76th Street to 1-494 Bridge
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
thru 11, Block 1, EDINBOROUGH ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, AL JOHNSON ADDITION;
Commencing at a point on East line of Lot 1 distance 177.36 feet South from
Northeast corner thereof thence North 89 deg. 52 min. 23 sec. West 193.87 feet to
East line of A1 JOHNSON ADDITION thence South to’southeast corner of said Addition
thence West to Southwest corner thereof thence Southerly and Southeasterly along
Westerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, PAUL KLODT 1ST ADDITION to most Southerly corner
of said Lot 1 thence North along East line thereof to beg, Block 1, PAUL KLODT
FIRST ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS :
‘
$83 , 554.96
12. BLACKTOP, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-270
West 76th Street from Xerxes Avenue to Edinborough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 1,
Block 1, EBENEZER SOCIETY 1ST ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 11, Block 1, EDINBOROUGH .
ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, AL JOHNSON ADDITION; That part of Lot 1 lying Northerly
of following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1
thence South along the East line thereof a distance of 177.36 feet to a point of
beginning of line to be described thence North 89 deg. 52 min. 23 sec. West 193.87
feet to East line of AL JOHNSON ADDITION and there terminating, Block 1, PAUL
KLODT FIRST ADDITION; Lot 5, LYNDALE BUILDERS ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, MEADOW
LANE SECOND ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, YOWALE TOWNHOMES OF EDINA.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $54,269.76
13. BLACKTOP, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-271
Edinb orough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said assessment is as follows: Lots 1
thru 11, EDINBOROUGH WAY ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
These proposed assessment rolls are now on file in the office of the City Clerk
and are open to public inspection.
APPEAL
Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the
City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City
Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days
after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is
filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the
presiding officer at the hearing.
DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65.YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and
guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by
persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain
deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor’s office by the close
of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in
the first paragraph of this notice.
forms, please call or visit the City Assessor‘s office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
$280,909.42
However, no appeal may be taken as to an
For further information and application
1988 BUDGET HEARING DATES SET.
Member Turner setting the following date for 1988 Budget Hearings:
Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by
Tuesday, September 8 4:30-6:30 p.m.
Tuesday, September 15 4:30-6:30 p.m.
Thursday, September 17 4:30-6:30 p.m.
Monday, September 21(Adopt budget) 7:OO p.m.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
STATUS REPORT GIVEN ON HEDBERG PROPERTY.
Members on the status of the Hedberg property, advising that since the last report
on July 2, 1987 City staff and legal counsel have conducted two meetings with the
Hedberg project development team.
Manager Rosland updated the Council
The first meeting focused principally on
8/3/87
480
07 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 92.79 feet to a point which lies
30.76 feet westerly as measured along said line from the east line of said
Lot 22 and the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence
North 11 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 18.50 feet;
thence South 78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 8.90 feet;
thence South 11 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 5.66 feet;
thence South 78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 33.93
feet; thence South 11 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of
12.84 feet; thence North 78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds East to the
point of beginning,
:.
by the property adjacent to the south and which lies above an elevation of
890.32 N.G.V.D.
and
Parcel B: That part of Lot 22, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS THIRD ADDITION,
Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies South of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said Lot 22; thence on an assumed
bearing of South 10 degrees 28 minutes 12 seconds East along the west
line of said Lot 22 a distance of 93.69 feet to the point of beginning
of the line to be described; thence North 78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds
East a distance of 123.55 feet to the East line of said Lot 22 and there
terminating.
Together with an easement to allow use, maintenance and repair over that part
of the property which is described as:
1 !
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 22; thence on an assumed
bearing of South 10 degrees 28 minutes 12 seconds East along the west line
of said Lot 22 a distance of 93.69 feet; thence North 78 degrees 07 minutes
38 seconds East a distance of 92.79 feet to a point which lies 30.76 feet
westerly as measured along said line from the east line of said Lot 22 and
the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence North 11
degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds West a distance 0f~18.50 feet; thence South
78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 8.90 feet; thence .
South 11 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 5.66 feet; thence
South 78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 33.93 feet;
thence South 11 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 12.84
feet; thence North 78 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds East to the point of
beginning,
by the property adjacent to the north and which lies above an elevation of
890.32 N.G.V.D.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the amended resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RETIREMENT RECEPTION FOR BOB BURESH NOTED.
Members of the retirement reception planned for Bob Buresh, retired Public Safety
Director, on Wednesday, August 5, 1987 at Braemar Clubhouse from 5 to 7 p.m.
LETTER OBJECTING TO EARLY POOL CLOSING NOTED. Manager Rosland referred to a
letter from Phyllis Kohler, 4512 West 70th Street, objecting to the proposed early
closing of the municipal pool on August 23. This has been discussed with Bob
Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, and it has been determined that the
pool will be kept open until Labor Day unless the weather turns cold.
ADDITION TO FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL PLANNED.
Fairview Southdale Hospital has brought in plans for a 20.,000 square addition to
the hospital.
request for Final Development Plan approval to construct a medical office building
the consultant had stated that Fairview Southdale Hospital presently had no plans
to expand the hospital.
public hearing. Member Turner asked why it would not have to come to the Council
for approval.
provides that if the expansion increases the floor area by 10% or more it triggers
a review of the Final Development Plan by the City Council.
expansion of the hospital would be less than 10% of the floor area. Mr. Rosland
said that the Planning Department has not yet had the chance to review the plans
Manager Rosland reminded the Council
Manager Rosland advised that
He recalled that during the public hearings on the hospital's
Mr. Rosland said that this addition may not require a
Assistant Manager Hughes explained that the Zoning Ordinance
The proposed
and determin all th fa
8/3/87
ts to determine the procedure,. No action was
481
aken .
%LAIMS PAID.
approve payment of the following claims as per pre-list dated 8/3/87:
Fund $148,543.58, Art Center $1,630.36, Capital Fund $2,250.00, Swimming Pool Fund
$2,849.44, Golf Course Fund $13,040.84, Recreation Center Fund $3,312.51, Gun
Range Fund $439.75, Edinborough Park $4,136.16, Utility Fund $248,876.76, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $4,839.71, Construction Fund $2,131.10, Total $432,050.21.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to
General
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion for adjournment was
made by Member Smith, seconded by Member Kelly and carried unanimously.
Adjournment at 8:58 p.m.
T&&%. w-
City Clerk
I
m 5