HomeMy WebLinkAbout19870921_regular18 MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 21, 1987
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED.
Member mer to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 17. 1987 APPROVED. Motion vas made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the Regular
Meetjng of August 17, 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONCLUDED: ASSESSMENTS LEVIED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL NO. TS-87 AND
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S-35.
hereinafter recorded on the following proposed assessments:
Public hearings were concluded and action taken as
1. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TS-87
Location: Intersection of West 70th Street and Cornelia Drive
Engineer Hoffman stated that the public hearing on the proposed assessment for
Traffic Control Signal Improvement No. TS-87 had been continued at the meeting of
September 14, 1987 at the request of the Edina School Board to allow discussion of
the proposed assessment at their meeting of September 14, 1987. He recalled that
at the public hearing on the project held on June 17, 1985 it was reported that
the State had approved funding for one-half of the cost of the signal installation
from State Aid funds and that 50% of the cost required a local funding source.
The three proposed.alternatives for funding the local share of the project were:
1) City General Fund, 2) City General Fund and School District funds, and 3)
special assessment of the neighborhood which was defined as the approximate
walking area for students attending Cornelia School.
notified of the public hearing and of the potential assessment.
Minutes of the June 17, 1985 meeting record that a motion was discussed to fund
the traffic signal project by special- assessment to the School District and the
City. However, that motion failed to pass. An alternative motion was passed
adopting a resolution ordering the traffic control signal system with the
recommendation that the one-half of the construction cost not funded by State Aid
funds be assessed 1/3 to the City, 1/3 to the School district and 1/3 to benefited
property owners.
$14.00 per lot for property owners, $15,000 for the City, and $15,000 for the
School District.
Engineer Hoffman stated that the balance of construction cost of $45,870.60 after
applying State Aid funds to the project is proposed to be assessed as follows: one
year assessment of $17.80 per. lot against 818 assessable lots, City of Edina
$16,037.80 and School District No. 273 $15,290.00.
traffic signals in the community are placed at the intersection of a county road
and a municipal State Aid street and most of the funding comes from gas tax funds.
An exception was on France Avenue between West 66th and West 69th Streets where
there are two 'traffic signals that serve the'southdale Office Center and Southdale
Center.
subject traffic signal would be the second time that the cost is proposed to be
assessed against benefited property owners. . Services for School District No. 273, in reference to the September 15, 1987 - ,
letter from the School Board clarified that in checking they did uncover a file
containing the notice of public hearing for the traffic signal project and a copy
of the Council Minutes of June 17, 1985. He said that the position of the School
District would have been that installation of traffic signals in the community was
a responsibility of the City and that the funding would be best coming from State
Aid funds, County and City sources. He added that given the circumstances of this
traffic signal installation, the pressure from the community and lack of funding
for the total cost, the District realized that this may not be possible.
Therefore the position of the District at this time is that the assessment be on.
an area-wide distribution based on the values of the properties, the District
being one of those property owners and that they take exception to the 1/3
approach.
needed was because of the elementary school located there.
that the traffic signal is used by many people in the area and that she would be
open to spreading the assessment area further.
realizes that the traffic signal is of great benefit to the children attending
Cornelia School and that it has had a positive affect in reducing the speed of
vehicles through the area. Member Smith pointed outJhat there is a park that
surrounds two sides of the school which is owned by the City and that there is a
mutual benefit at that intersection.
clarified that the School District's position is that the 2/3 cost be assessed
over the entire property of the area of which the School District owns some
property. This would leave the City to be assessed for 1/3 of the cost. Engineer
Hoffman said if the Council were to approve the assessment as suggested by the
School District it would amount to an assessment of approximately $35.00 per legal
Approximately 800 homes were
The Council
That recommendation resulted in an estimated assessment of
As presented at the public hearing on September 14, 1987,
He explained that typically
Those signals were assessed 100% against the benefitted properties. The
Jim Hamann, Director of Business
.
Mayor Courtney commented that the main reason a traffic light was
Member Kelly commented
Mr. Hamann said the School
In response to Member Smith, Mr. Hamann
!-
1
9/21/87
19
parcel of property.
equitable based on property value, recognizing that the property of the School
District has more value than a residential lot.
this would be difficult to do. Member Kelly said that she felt the assessment as
proposed by the City is equitable and suggested that the assessment be spread over
a longer period of time inasmuch as the School District had not budgeted for this
expenditure.
Member Turner commented that she agreed that the assessment distribution that the
Council discussed in June of 1985 was an appropriate one; that there is no
precedent for this kind of thing and that the City's philosophy has been to
generally identify the benefited owners; that the proposed distribution of the
cost made sense because of the use of the signal at that intersection; and that
spreading the.assessment over a longer period of time was a good idea.
comment being heard, motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner and
carried unanimously to approve the assessment as proposed with the exception that
the assessment to School District No. 273 and to the City would be spread over
five years.
Mr. Hamann said their intent was that the assessment would be
Engineer Hoffman indicated that
Mr. Hamann said that would be the District's fall-back position.
No further
(Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.)
2. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S-35
Location: West 44th Street, Park Place and Woodcrest Drive
Engineer Hoffman stated that the public hearing on the proposed assessment for
Sidewalk Improvement No. S-35 had been continued at the meeting of September 14,
1987 to allow staff to re-check the proposed assessments for several property
owners who had submitted letters of objection.
findings: 1) 5600 Woodcrest Drive - owner was contacted and it was determined that
the owner had replaced five sidewalk panels a few weeks prior to the two panels
done by the City; recommendation is that the owner should be assessed for only two
panels, 2) 4315 Eton Place - City records indicate that a boulevard tree was taken
down in 1981; recommendation is that the assessment be adjusted for the cost of
two panels where the sidewalk had buckled because of the tree, 3) 4200 West 44th
Street - owner had been given due notice of the project hearing. In conclusion,
Engineer Hoffman recommended that the Council approve the assessment of a total of
$25,569.52 as opposed to the proposed assessable total cost of the sidewalk
improvement of $27,728.81 which would reflect the above adjustments and that the
difference be funded from the City's tree budget for the two panels involving tree
damage and from engineering fees collected as a revenue on the project and that
there be no other changes to the assessment as proposed at the meeting of
September 14, 1987. No public comment was heard. Motion of Member Turner was
seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously to approve the assessment as
proposed with the exception that the total amount to be assessed be reduced to
$25,569.52 to reflect the two recommended adjustments and that the difference be
funded as recommended by the City Engineer. (Assessment levied by the following
resolution.)
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
He reported the following
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEWENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1.
assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such
hearings held on September 21, 1987, has considered all oral and &itten
objections presented against the levy of such assessments.
2.
assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City
Clerk for the following improvements:
The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed
Subject to the amendments made in paragraph 3 of this resolution, each of the
Traffic Control Signal Improvement No. TS-87
Sidewalk Improvement No. S-35
does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot,
tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby
adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective
improvements to be spread against the benefited lots, parcels and tracts of land
described therein.
3. Said assessments are hereby amended as follows: Traffic Control Signal
Improvement No. TS-87 - assessment to School District No. 273 and to the City be
spread over five years; Sidewalk Improvement No. S-35 - Total amount to be
assessed be reduced to $25,569.52.
4. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of
said installments, together with interest at a rate of 8.9% per annum on the
entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1988, to be payable with
the general taxes for the year 1988.
added interest at the above'rate for one year on all then unpaid installments..
The number of such annual installments shall be as follows:
To each subsequent installment shall be
Name of Improvement
"FIG CONTBOL SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT
NO. TR-87 (LEVY NO. 10661)
Number of Installments
/ 1 year (LEW NO. 10864) 5 years
SIDEWAIX IMPROVEMENT NO. S-35 10 years
5. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a
copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each
then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the
tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
9/21/87
20
6.
payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any
right-of-vay as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4,
and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer
shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said
Section.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
The City Clerk shall also nail notice of any special assessment which may be
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
I APPEAL FROM BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION (MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES. INC.) CONTINUED TO
11/2/87. .Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Michael Halley Homes, Pnc. from the Board of Appeals Decision concerns the
Interlachen Country Club.
25 foot setback variance and a 15 foot height variance to erect protective netting
between the driving range and a new dwelling.
all structures be set back a minimum of 50 feet and to not exceed 40 feet in
height.
the likelihood of a golf ball from the practice tee striking the home or residents
on property owned by Michael Halley Homes, Inc. at 6212 Interlachen Boulevard.
The proposed location of the netting is to be in the wooded area and out of view
for the most part from the residence. The ground in that area slopes to the north
resulting in the need for the additional height. Planner Larsen presented a
graphic showing the locations of the proposed netting and the new residence. The
portion of the netting in the wooded area would be of metal mesh and that portion
in the open area would be a retractable netting made of fiberglass. The variance
request was before the Board on two different occasions and the Board approved the
variance as requested at its meeting of August 20, 1987. The Board's decision was
appealed by Michael Halley, owner of the subject dwelling. Since the appeal was
filed there have been attempts between Interlachen Country Club and Mr. Halley to
come to a private solution of this matter which would protect both parties.
noted that representatives of both parties were present.
Bamett, stated that he represented Interlachen Country Club and that Ken
Lindgren, President and Don Abel, Manager were also present. Mr. Haugh said that
Interlachen Country Club had asked for the variances to be approved so that they
could protect against any possible risk to the home which was recently constructed
very near to the property line.
an alleged claim that there is risk there and wished to take steps to protect
against any potential problem.
already and that is to move the target flags on the practice tee away from the
home. In the event that there is a problem, the Club would like to be able to
solve it by putting up a high netting close to the property line which would catch
golf balls which might possibly invade the subject property.
understood there is a proposed buyer of the property and would be happy to work
with that individual regarding the netting.
wooded area, would be a green nylon type of mesh and would not be obvlous.
Crouch, Gray, Plant et al, stated he represented Michael Halley Homes, Inc. He
said that since drafting his letter dated September 17, 1987 there has been a
change in circumstances that he felt changed dramatically what would be
appropriate for the Council to consider at this time.
reflected the change which was that the house was sold over the-weekend as
evidenced by a purchase agreement dated September 18, 1987.
that the Council hold in abeyance its consideration of the request for'the
variances for the reason that.the purchaser, whose closing date is November 15,
1987, has expressed a willingness to sit down with the Club to consider what other
solutions might be workable to each of the parties.
requested that this matter be continued for four weeks so that if possible the
Council will not become embroiled in a dispute which might be very contentious and
expensivs for everyone. Mr. Crouch stated that they have had three meetings so
far with representatives of the Club and there are prospects for resolving this
other than the erection of something that will be an eyesore and will impose a
burden on his client. Mr. Crouch then presented several proposed solutions for
re-directing the flight of golf balls from the practice tee. In conclusion, Mr-
Crouch said that they would like to see if the new buyer can make its peace with
the Club and work out something to their mutual satisfaction..
that they have attempted to negotiate on this matter and will continue to do so
with either Michael Halley Homes, Inc. or with the new buyer.
advised the Council that she is a pool/tennis member of Interlachen Country Club
and that she did not feel she should abstain from voting because of that fact.
Member Smith commented that there are two homes there built by two qifferent
developers; that he would like to see the Council not involved and would like to
see this matter resolved between the affected parties.
the appeal from the Board of Appeals Decision be continued to the Council meeting
of November 2, 198P.
if the parties involved could not come together, he felt the party seeking the
variance should make their case before the council so that all the facts could be
weighed before making its decision. Ken Lindgren spoke to the motion to continue
Planner Craig Larsen informed the Council that the subject of the appeal of
The request that was before the Board of Appeals was a
The Zoning Ordinance requires that
Interlachen Country Club desires to erect a protective netting to reduce
.
-
He
Bill Haugh, Moss and
I The Club was made aware by the property owner of
He pointed out that the Club has taken one step
Mr. Haugh said they
The netting would be mainly in'a
John
He presented a letter that ..
He felt that dictates
In his letter Mr. Crouch had
I Mr. Haugh responded
Member Kelly
Member Smith moved that
Motion was seconded by Member Richards who commented that,
9/21/87
21
the matter stat,ng that they had met wit
received a letter in early June from him demanding that the Club close its
practice area because golf balls were landing on his property.
considered that a very serious threat to the activities that the Club had
conducted on their property for over 70 years. Solutions that were discussed at
the meeting all involved a great deal of expense on the part of the Club who did
not think they were practical but they were ready to listen.
suggested the proposed netting as an alternative to avoid the burden of a solution
that would involve great expense and may not be possible on the Club's property.
He said that they have attempted to negotiate with Mr. Halley in good faith but
have not been successful. He concluded that the Club would like to move forward
to protect their legitimate interest in the use of their property by putting up
the protective netting. Member Turner commented that, while she understood the
frustration of both parties in attempting to'communicate, any time a solution can
be reached that does not involve government as part of the solution it is worth
taking the extra time; that there is a new party to the discussion and that she
hoped that a solution can be reached before November 2.
Mayor Courtney then called the motion.
Mr. Halley shortly after the Club had
The Club
The Club then
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR PONDWOOD ESTATES CONTINUED TO 10/5/87. Affidavits
of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Craig Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Pondwood
Estates, generally located east of County Road 18 and north of West Trail.
property measures approximately 5.7 acres in size and is developed with a single
family dwelling located in the west central portion of the property.
significant feature of the site is the pond along the easterly portion of the
property.
create ten new buildable lots.
He advised that lots in the proposed plat range from 14,300 square feet to 20,200
square feet with an average size of 16,833 square feet.
nearly identical in size and shape to lots in the neighborhood along Pawnee Road
and Apache Road. The preliminary plat suggests the extension of Apache Road,
which currently dead ends into the subject property, west through to McCauley
Trail to serve six lots and a new cul-de-sac (Hume Circle) to serve the five
northerly lots.
from Hennepin County adjacent to Lots 1 and 5, Block 1. This would allow
increased lot sizes and would move the house on Lot 3 further from the pond.
Continuing, Planner Larsen explained that storm water enters the pond from Apache
Road and Indian Hills Road as well as run-off from adjacent property.
there is no outlet for the pond. The recent heavy rains caused the yards of homes
along Pawnee Road to flood and the only way to reduce the level of the pond was to
pump out the excess water. The developers are proposing to install an outlet for
the pond which would connect to the county system in McCauley Trail. In addition
to the outlet the developers are suggesting other changes to the pond which could
improve its appearance.
bubblers or fountains to retard algae growth and possibly an augmentation well to
provide year around water in the pond if approved by the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources.
certain neighbors regarding their proposal for the lots, the improvements for the
pond and the roadway system.
meeting of September 2, 1987 the central issue that was discussed regarding the
proposed subdivision was the extension of Apache Road. Three proposals were
discussed: 1) extension of Apache Road through to McCauley Trail (supported by
staff for reasons of overall traffic equity in the area, access by emergency
vehicles and ease of snowplowing), 2) extension of Apache Road to the west with a
cul-de-sac before it reaches McCauIey Trail, and 3) access by means of a
cul-de-sac from McCauley Trail.
preliminary plat on a 4 to 3 vote, subject to the following conditions: 1) Final
Plat approval and subdivision dedication, 2) Execution of a Developer's Agreement,
3) Acquisition of excess right of way along McCauley Trail, 4) Staff approval of
dredging plans for the pond with neighborhood involvement through the developer,
5) Issuance of permits required by Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and 6) Amendment of the Comprehensive
Plan to change the land use designation for the subject property from Park to
Single Family Residential. Michael Halley, proponent, commented that at the first
several meetings with the neighborhood they had concentrated on the pond situation
which became very aggravated following the July rainstorm.
Engineer is comfortable with what is proposed as far as installing an outlet for
the pond to avoid future flooding. At the Planning Commission meeting it became
obvious that the neighbors on Apache Road would prefer that it remain stubbed as
it now exists and that.a cul-de-sac be constructed from McCauley Trail eastward
towards Apache Road.
because of the larger asphalt area a cul-de-sac would require the houses to be set
back further.
feet closer to the pond and would need a substantial setback variance. The other
concern is that the City may require a finished end to the Apache Road stud which
would really crowd the property.
The
The most
The proponents have submitted a request for subdivision which would -
Lot 6 would be retained for the existing dwelling.
The proposed lots are
The proposed plat assumes the acquisition of excess right of way
Currently
These changes may include some dredging and reshaping,
In conclusion he noted that the developers have met with
At the Community Development and Planning Commission
The Commission recommended approval of the
He said that the City
Mr. Halley said his only concerns with that were that
The home on the proposed Lot 7 would be pushed approximately 30
He said that the neighborhood had objected to
9/21/87 . -_ 22
the extension o
traffic and the noise from County Road 18. Mr. Halley illustrated on a graphic
the various alternatives and how they would relate to the proposed subdivision.
He concluded by saying he would defer to whatever the Council would decide
regarding the street and asked that a variance be granted if needed for Lot 7 and
also asked how the end of Apache Road would be treated.
Apache Road, said that the neighborhood was generally happy with the proposed
subdivision of single family homes. He said they had objections to the extension
of Apache Road through to McCauley Trail for several reasons: 1) traffic and 2)
loss of a stand of trees which would allow noise and visual pollution from County
Road 18.
Trail as is being proposed for Hume Circle. He said they have been trying to get
together with the developer to avoid debating this issue in a public hearing. He
concluded by saying that they hoped the Council would approve a cul-de-sac coming
in from McCauley Trail .and leave Apache Road as is. Engineer Hoffman commented
that if there is a sense on the part of the Council to cul-de-sac either end of
Apache Road the grades for that alternative should be reviewed by staff as the
proposed plat which was reviewed was predicated on the extension of Apache Road
through to McCauley Trail.
preliminary plat approval for Pondwood Estates to the Council meeting of October
5, 1987 to allow for staff review of the grading for the proposed cul-de-sacs.
Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
the homes oriented towards Edina rather than towards the industrial area to the
west, that he supported a cul-de-sac at one end or the other and that because of
the vote by the Planning Commission he would hope for more input so that the
Council could come to the best resolution possible when this issue is decided.
Yale Dolginow, 6608 Pawnee Road, said that he lives on the pond and that he was
concerned that a delay would affect financing for the project as proposed. He
said he had heard a rumor that if this project fell through that it could be
developed with multi-unit dwellings.
for the developer and either solution for the roadway has an engineering solution
and that they could work out any grading problems.
would favor a cul-de-sac coming in from McCauley Trail.
from reading the Planning Commission minutes, the staff report and the discussion
to this point, the focus is on the issue of where the street should go and how the
lots should be laid out. In order to make a decision on that issue she said she
needed the staff analysis based on the grading plan. Mayor Courtney then called
the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Apache Road through to McCauley Trail "ecause of the through
.
Marvin Ingber, 6705
Their proposal would be to construct a cul-de-sac entering from McCauley I
Member Smith moved to continue the hearing on
Member Richards said he would prefer to see I
Bob Thene, said he was the civil engineer
Member Smith commented that he
Member Turner said that
1 In response to concerns voiced by several neighbors that a delay may end the
proposed project for single family homes, Member Richards asked Mr. Halley if he
would lose the deal by a delay of two weeks.
proposed anything other than single family and that he could live with a two week
delay.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR SZECHUAN STAR RESTAURANT. Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
Craig Larsen presented the request for Final Development Plan Approval for
Szechuan Star Restaurant, generally located east of France Avenue and south of
Hazelton Road.
is developed with a 4,730 square foot restaurant facility containing 122 seats.
The proponents are requesting approval of a plan to add an additional 40 seats
within a 750 square foot expansion.
parking stalls available on site.
Ordinance is 66 parking spaces.
existing brown roofing panels and the existing brick will be re-used.
plan will also be reviewed by staff as well as other site improvements.
addition conforms to all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance as well as private
deed restrictions and design requirements specified at the time of the original
Yorktown plat. At its meeting of September 2, 1987 the Community Development and
Planing Commission recommended approval of the Final Development Plan, subject to
the following conditions: 1) Staff approval of the landscaping plan and schedule,
2) Re-striping of the parking area to more clearly define available stalls, 3)
Repair, replacement or removal of damaged lighting fixtures in the parking area,
and 4) Health Department approval of associated storage facilities. Mr. Larsen
concluded his presentation by indicating that Michael McCalvy, contractor for the
project, was present to answer any questions.
received from Harold Benjamin,'7220 York Avenue So.
being heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved
adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ed-, Minnesota, that the Final
Development Plan for Szechuan Star Restaurant, 3655 Hazelton Road, presented at
the regular meeting of the City Council of September 21, 1987 be and is hereby
approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Mr. Halley said that he never
Planner
The subject property is zoned PC-3 Planned Commercial District and
* '
The parking requirement specified by the Zoning
A landscape
The proposed parking plan illustrates 70
The materials of the addition will match the
The
I
A letter of objection had been
No additional objections .
Rollcall :
Resolution adopted.
'Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
9/21/87
23
*HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER.' Motion of Member Smith was seconded by
Member mer to set October 4, 1987 as the hearing date for the following
Planning matter:
1) Rezoning - R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD-5 Mixed Development
District and Preliminary Plat Approval - United Properties - General located east
of France Avenue, north of 1-494 and south of Dayton's Home Store (Hedberg
property).
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 9/15/87 APPROVED. Motion of Member Richards
was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action as
listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 15, 1987:
1) Installation of a "STOP" sign at the newlx constructed intersection of Timber
Trail at HcCauley Trail,
2) Installation of a "CAUTION - DEAF CHILD" sign near 5716 Zenith Avenue,
and to acknowledge Section C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION SUPPORT OF INTER-FAITH PEACEMAKERS OF EDINA CONFERENCE
APPROVED. Ceil Smith, Assistant to the Manager, informed the Council that the
Human Relations Commission has requested Council approval for their endorsement of
the "Peace Issues Conference" to be held on October 31, 1987 sponsored by the
Inter-Faith Peacemakers of Edina. The intention of the conference is to encourage
dialogue about how U.S. foreign policy should be formulated, in light of the
changes taking place, to best serve our long-term peaceful interests. Roger
Heegaard, Program Chair, said that 1987 is the fifth anniversary of the
organization, that they are trying to develop more community interest in the
issues around the nuclear arms race and the risks of global conflict, and that
they are hoping leading civic organizations will agree to support them.
discussion followed in which it was clarified that approval of endorsement by the
Human Relations Commission is intended to endorse dialogue and to not take a
position on the issues.
approve the Human Relations Commission endorsement of the "Peace Issues
Conference".
for the Commission to endorse such an effort with the full knowledge that the
Commission reflects the Council.
may make a judgement that the Council is endorsing a stand on the issues.
A brief
Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly to
Member Turner commented that she felt this was an appropriate role
Mayor Courtney stated that he felt that people
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner
Nays : Courtney
Motion carried.
ROLE OF CHAC SUB-COMMITTEE OF HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION NOTED. Member Turner
noted that the Human Relations Commission is taking a more formal role in an
advisory capacity to the Edina School District through its Chemical Health
Advisory Sub-Committee (CHAC). As part of that they have been working on an
application for a Federal Drug-Free Schools grant of $16,533.
supported the Commission and in particular CHAC in this new role.
COUNCIL BROCHURE READY FOR PRINTING.
the new Council brochure is ready for printing after the addition of pictures and
should be available for meetings soon.
She said she
Manager Rosland informed the Council that
TAXI CAB RATE INCREASES DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised the Council that a
request had been received collectively from four taxi cab companies for approval
of a meter rate increase due to a considerable rise in the cost of operating a
taxi cab. He recalled that it has-been the Council's policy in the past to not be
involved in setting rates and to let private industry competition determine fares.
It was informally agreed by the Council members to maintain its policy of not
regulating fares.
1988 BUDGET HEARINGS CONCLUDED: 1988 CITY BUDGET OF $11,849,806 ADOPTED. The
hearings on the proposed 1988 Budget were continued from the Budget Meeting of
September 17, 1987.
presentation of the 1988 Budget and would respond to any further questions of the
Council.
Manager's 1988 compensation. The report was discussed and it was concluded that
the concept of merit increase should be considered by the Council at a later time.
Mayor Courtney called for public comment on the proposed 1988 Budget and hearing
none the hearings were considered closed. The Council Members then individually
presented their viewpoints on the proposed 1988 Budget, indicating support or
non-support for specific programs and line items. The Council discussed at length
the various programs and line items that had been identified and reached a
consensus thereon.
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
No formal action was taken.
Manager Rosland stated that staff had concluded its
Member Kelly presented the report of the Personnel Committee on the
Following agreement on the debatable items, Member Smith
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR CITP OF EDINA
FOR THE YEAR 1988, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR
THE YEAR 1988 PAYABLE IN 1988
9/21/87
._ 24
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITP OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLTAWS:
Section 1.
adopted as hereinafter set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore:
GENERAL .FUND
The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1988 is hereby
GENERAL GO-
Mayor and Council $ 53,500
Planning 172 , 119
Administrat ion 545 , 625
Finance 255 , 123
Election 79 , 605
Assessing 270 , 951
Legal and Court Services 300.000
$ 95,438
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration
Engineering 382 , 933
Highways 2.496.585
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
Police $2,914,751
Fire 1 , 785 , 416
Civilian Defense 23,518
himal Control 51 , 788
Public Health 254,802
Inspection 205.860
.I TOTAL GENERAL GOvER"T $1,676,923
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 2,974,956
TOTAL PROTECTION OF PERSONS
AND PROPERTY 5 , 236 , 135
PARK DEPARTMENT
Administration $ 547,027
Recreation 102,050
Maintenance 840,775
TOTAL PARK DEPARTHEXW $ 1,489,852
NON-DEPARTMENTAL EXPENI)IT[IRES
Contingencies $ 80,000
Special Assessments on City Property 75,000
Capital Plan Appropriation 138 , 000
Commissions &nd Special Projects 178.940 I TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL
EXPwDI!riJRES $ 471.940
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $11,849,806
Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby established Section 2.
as hereinafter set forth:
GENERAL FUND
Licenses and Permits $ 565,200
Municipal Court Fines 500 , 000
Department Service Charges 746 , 166
Other 187,500
Transfer from Liquor Fund 350 , 000
State Apportionments - Sales Tax 549 , 697
Income on lnvestments 65 , 000
Aids - Other Agencies 180 , 000
Police Aid 137.000
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $ 3,280,663
That there be and hereby is levied upon all taxable real and personal Section 3.
property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts
hereinafter set forth:
Motion for adoption of the resolution.was seconded by Member Kelly.
FOR GENERAL FUND $ 8,569,143
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
2 1 I ORDIN-4NCE NO. 171-A27 (TO INCREASE. ADD AND DELETE CERTAIN FEES) ADOPTED: SECOND
READING WAIVED.
adopt the following OrdiDazlce, waiving Second Reading:
Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner to
ORDINANCE NO. 171-A27
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO INCREASE OR DEC-E
CERTAIN FEES. TO ADD FE NOS. 14ab-1 & 251AND TO DELETE FEE NOS. 140. 1411, 14x
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
to Ordinance No. 171 are amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC. -- NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE/CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
43281 15 Plumbing permit, Each fixture 8.00 14a
gas fitting Rough-in ffxture 6.00 14b
permit Setting fixtures on previous
rough-in 6.00 14c
Beer dispenser (when connected
with water supply 5.00 14d
Section 1. The amounts of the following described fee numbers of Schedule A
9 121187
25
.a
43281 15 Plumbing permit,
gas fitting
permit
cu Ln
m Q:
433 6(a) Warm air,
ventilation,
air conditioning,
warm air winter
Zieating work
permits
433 6(b) Warm air all-year
conditioning
system work
permits
Blow off basin 9.00 14e
Catch basin/flammable waste trap 9.00 14f
Electric water heater 9.00 14g
Hydraulic valve 9.00 14h
Manholes 9.00 141.
New ground run for existing
building 9.00 14j
Roof drains 9.00 14k
Sump and receiving tanks 9.00 141
Water treating device (softener) 9.00 14m
For extending water lines:
up to 1-1/2" 9.00 14n
Automatic washer
Refrigerator cut into water line
Air conditioning
Sprinkler system Cfire or lawn)
Sewer - sanitary or storm 18.00 14P
Water 18.00 14q Installing water meter 18.00 14r
Taps :
3/4" 100 :oo 14s
1" 100.00 14t
Blacktop, per 2.~4' hole 120.00 14v
Concrete, per 2.~4' hole 120.00 14w
Road repair:
Gas (for three openings):
up to 2" 13.00 14Y
Each additional opening up
to 2" 2.00
Over 2" 18.00 142
Each additional opening
over 2" 2.00
14~-1
142-1
Gas stove 9.00 14aa
Hot water heater, up to 99,000
BTU' s 9.00 14ab
Gas light 9.00 14a
Gas barbecue 9.00 14ad
Incinerator 15.00 14ae
Minimum permit fee 12.00 14af
1. Furnace - including ducts,
registers, etc.
Gravity ) Up to & including
Mechanical) 100,000 BTU's input $23.00 15a-1
Each additional 50,000 BTTJ's 8.00 15a-2
2. Replacement - furnace only
13.00 15a-3 Mechanical) 100,000 BTU's
Each additional 50,000 BTU's
input or fraction thereof 8.00 15-a4
3. Alteration, additions or
repairs to existing system '
(such as air cleaner, humidifiers,
ducts, etc)
Up to $500.00 13.00 15a-5
Each additional $500.00 or
fraction thereof 8.00 15a-6
4. Air conditioning coils added
to existing system
up to 1,000 CPH 18.00 15a-7
Each additional 1,000 CPH or
fraction thereof 8.00 15-a8
5. Direct gas fired unit used as Fee 15-a9
a winter air conditioning system
1. Furnace - air conditioning coil,
ducts, registers, air cleaner,
humidifier , etc :
100,000 BTU input heating and
Gravity ) Up to & including I.
same as
#1 above
1,000 CFM air conditioning 33.00 15b-1
Each additional 50,000 BTTJ input
heating and/or 1,000 CPH air
conditioning or fraction thereof 8.00 15b-2
2. Duct systems-heating-air condi-
tioning (other than steam or hot
water heating plant, equipment,
cooling coils or electric heating
equipment):
n
9/21/87
26
433 6(c) Summer air
conditioning work
permit (such as
attic units w/fan
coil or fan coil
in basement)
6(d) Ventilation vork
permit
6(e) Electric heating
systems work
permits
6(f) Gas burner, gas
stove, range, gas
log, etc work
permits
6(g) Oil burners, tanks
and equipmentwork
permits
Up to $500.00 13.00
Each additional $500.00 or
fraction thereof 8.00
5. Alteration, additions, or
repairs to existing system:
-Up to $500.00 ’ 13.00
Each additional $500.00 or
fraction thereof 8.00
work-registers:
Up to and including 1,000 CFH 18.00
Each additional 1,000 CFH or
fraction thereof . 8.00
1. Each system-including duct
1. General ventilation -
including fan and duct system:
Up to and including 2,000 CFH
Each additional 1,000 CFH or
fraction thereof
2. Noxious vapors and/or
flammable material spraying,
painting or dipping ventilation -
including fan and duct system:
Up to and including 2,000 CFH
Each additional1,OOO CFH or
fraction thereof
3. Domestic type kitchen or bath-
room exhaust system:
Each system when vented
individually in single or
multiple dwellings
Each additional system
For first 28 kilowatts 96,000 BTU
Each additional 14 kilowatts
48,000 BTU
In addition to the electric
heating permit, the usual electric
permit shall be required
1. For any permit for installing
gas stoves, ranges, gas water
heaters, process gas burners, or
other similar gas burning devices
not used in connection with a
heating system, the fee charged
shall be as follows for each such
device included in such permit:
Input :
Not exceeding 99,999 BTU
100,000 BTU but not exceeding
200,000 BTU but not exceeding
400,000 BTU but not exceeding
600,000 BTU but not exceeding
1,000,000 BTU but not exceeding
2,500,000 BTU but not exceeding
2. Alteration or repairs to
existing burner or equipment:
up to $100.00
Each additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof
3. L.P. gas installations:
199,999 BTU
399,999
599,999 BTU
999,999 BTU
2,499,999 BTU
9,999,999 BTU
Tanks:
500 gallons or less
2,000 gallons or less
Over 2,000 gallons
Including piping, controls,
diluter, etc
1. For any oil burner or its
equipment connected to a fuel oil
tank not buried or enclosed:
For inputs not over 2 gals/hr
For inputs not over 7 gals-
For inputs not over 18 gals-
For inputs not over 500 gal-
18 .OO
8.00
20 IO0
8.00
18.00
7.00
18.00
9.00
9.00
13.00
18.00
31.00
44.00
76.00
100.00
13.00
8.00
13.00
19.00
30.00
15.00
42.00
76 -00
144.00
15b-3
15b-4
15b-9
15b-10
15d-1
15d-2
15d-3
15d-4
15d-5
15d-5a
15e-1
15e-2
15f -1
15f -2
15f -3
15f -4
15f -5
15f -6
15f -7
15f -10
15f -11
15f -12
15f -13-
15f -14
15g-1
15g-3
15g-4
15g-7
27
433 6(h) Gas piping vork
permits I .i
6(i) Refrigeration
system work
u-) I
5 m
6(j) Factory built
chimney and
fireplace work
. permits
6(m) Steam or hot water
system work
permits
6(n) Steam or hot water
system (for other
than heating) work '
permits
6(0) Steam, hot water or
chilled water coil
vork permits
6(p) Power plant work
permits
For inputs over 500 gals/hr
2. For any tank not buried
or enclosed:
560 gallons or less
Over 560 gallons
For any tank buried or to be
enclosed:
560 gallons or less
Over 560 gallons
Over 2,000 gallons
1. Up to 2" piping with 3 or
less openings
2. Over 3 openings - per opening
3. Over 2" piping with 3 or less
openings
4. Over 3 openings - per opening
1. For each system up to and
incl%ding 36,000 BTU 3 tons
Each additional 36,000 BTU or
fraction thereof
2. Alterations, additions or
repairs to existing system
up to $500.00
Each additional $500.00 or
fraction thereof
1. For installation of factory
built chimney
Up to 8" inside diameter
Over 8" inside diameter
2. For installation of factory
built fireplace, Franklin
stove, fireplace stove, etc
when installed with factory
built chimney
1; Boiler and total system -
including piping, radiators,
coils, converters, etc:
Up to and including 100,000 BTU
input Each additional 50,000 BTU
input or fraction thereof
2. Boiler only - in connection
with an existing system:
Up to and including 240,000 BTU
input Each additional 50,000 BTU
input or fraction thereof
3. For the installation of a
piping system or miscellaneous.
piping, or additions, alter-
ations or repairs to a system:
Up to $500.00 cost
Each additional $500.00 or '
fraction thereof
1. The fees shall be the same as
in subparagraph 6(m) of this
section
Each system including coils,
piping controls, valves, etc
from existing system:
1. If heating or cooling up to
and including 100,000 BTU
Each additional 50,000 BTU or
fraction thereof
2. If coil is for heating and
cooling-up to and including
100,000 BTU
Each additional 50,000 BTU .
or fraction thereof
3. Additions, alterations or
repairs-the fee shall be the
same as in subparagraph 6(m)3.
of this section
1. For any permit for install-
ation of a power plant, for each
such boiler or furnace and
boiler or power plant to be
installed having an input not
.
210.00 15g-8
13.00 15g-9
16.00 15g-10
13.00 15g-11
18.00 15g-12
34.00 15g-13
13.00 15h-1
2.00 15h-2
18.00 15h-3
2.00 15h-4
13.00 151-1
8.00 15i-2
:13.00 151-3
8.00 151-4
12.00 15j-1
14.00 153-2
,17.00 15j-3
22.00 15m-1
8.00 15m-2
13.00 15m-3
8.00 15m-4
13.00 15m-5
8.00 15m-6
,.
15n
18.00 150-1
10.00 150-2
22.00 i50-3
12.00 150-4
150-5
150-5
9 121 I87 ._ 28
434 27(f)
612 6
644 3(d)
661 1
731 5
-.
-. .
902 10
exceeding 200,000 BTU per hour
2. For each additional 100,000 BTU
per hour or 3 H.P. or fraction
3. For any permit for alteration
or repairs to any existing power
plant or boiler or furnace and
boiler in connection with a power
plant, where the cost of proposed
4. For each additional $500.00
or fraction thereof, in the
or 6 H.P. 12.00 15p-1
thereof 8.00 15p-2
work does not exceed $500.00 12.00 15p-3
cost of such proposed work 8.00 15p-4
Public or semi-public
swimming pool license
$230.00 per annum for each
pool enclosed part or all of the year 17a
$125.00 per annum for each outdoor pool 17b
$50.00 per annum for each
bath or pool 18
Public or semi-public
vhirlpool bath or
therapeutic swimming
pool license
Special hazard permits Class I: General hazard and
fire safety inspections requiring
a special hazard permit under
Ordinance No. 612 - $25.00
Class 11: Special hazard
inspection involving various
hazardous materials and/or
processes in occupancies of
buildings less than 3000 sq ft
Class 111: Special hazard
but not lhited to, buildings or
occupancies 3000 sq ft or larger
where any of the following are
present :
A. Multiple hazards
B. Storage, handling, and/or
processes involving dangerous
or toxic materials, substances
and/or processes
C. Occupancies in which evaluation
or high valuation presents unique circumstances - $100.00 21b
$30.00 for each permit 50
21
21a * area - $50.00
- inspection primarily directed at,
Permit fee for cleaning
of commercial cooking
of- commercial cooking
ventilation systems
False fire alarm response 22a $165.00 for third and each
calendar year
$320.00 per annum ($270 certified) 25a
plus $80.00 per annum for each
additional facility
$100.00 per annum
fee subsequent response within one
Food establishment
Take out facility . $215.00 per annum ($165 certified) 25al
25a2 Packaged food sales
25a3 Food warehouse $45.00 per annum
Catering food establishment $320.00 per annum ($270 certified) 25a4
; plus $80.00 per annum for each
additional facility $45.00 per event 25b
25c
25d
$30.00 per annum
$50.00 per annum
Itinerant food
establishment
Retail candy shop
Readily perishable food
vehicle Fleet of 5 or more readily $250.00 per annum 25e .
perishable food vehicles
Bakery food vehicle
Catering food vehicle
Perishable food vehicle
Fleet of 5 or more
perishable food vehicles
Sunday (Clubs only)
intoxicating limr
sale license
25f $45.00 per annum
$120.00 per &m, plus $10.00 per 25g
annum for each additional vehicle
25h $50.00 per annum
25i $250.00 per annum
36a $250.00 per annum
2
9 /21/87
29
cu Ln
u-) I m a
902 16 Non-intoxicating malt
liquor license
On-sale $165.00 per annum (renewal)
Off-sale $165.00 per annum (renewal)
$220.00 per annum (new)
$220.00 per annum (new)
14 Temporary non-intoxicating $35.00
malt liquor on-sale
license
culture and health
service or club,
reducing club or salon,
sauna parlor, massage
parlor or escort service
1353 6(a) License for physical $200.00 for business license
Sec. 2. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the
following thereto:
ORD. SEC. -- NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE/CHBRGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
43281 15 Plumbing permit, Hot water heater
gas fitting permit Each additional 100,000 BTU
or fraction thereof - 6.00 14ab-1
establishment license fee based
upon ultimate food establishment
license category
2. Addition to, remodeling, repair 251-1
or renovation of existing food
facility - 50% of food establish-
ment license fee based upon ultimate
food establishment license category
73188 1 Food establishment 1. New construction - 100% of food 251
plan review
3. Minimum fee - $25.00 251-2
h Sec. 3. Fee Nos. 140, 14u and 14x to Schedule A of Ordinance No. 171 are
hereby deleted.
January 1, 1988, except that Fee No. 47a became effective July 16, 1986 upon
passage and publication of Ordinance No. 1353-82.
Sec. 4. Following publication, the effective date of this Ordinance shall be
ATTEST:
%&%.U
City Clerk
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance Adopted.
36c
36d
36f
36~-1
36d-1
47a
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED APPROVING 1988 FEES FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE AND PARK AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT.
Turner for adoption of the following resolution:
Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member
RESOLUTION SETTING PARK & RECREATION DEPAR!IXEN!l!
FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1988
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following Fees and Charges for
the year 1988, as submitted by the Park Board, be approved:
Park and Recreation
Playground $ 7.00 T-Ball $21.00
Aquatic Instruction 21.00 Tennis Instruction 21.00
Memberships : Class Fees: (8 weeks)
~ Art Center
Family 35.00 Adult Member 65.00
Individual 25.00 Adult Non-Member 72.00
Child Member 40.00
Art Center Rental 45.00/group Child Non-Member 44.00
Single Hour Rate
Contract Rate (lo+ hours)
Late Night (midnight or later)
Open Skating (Youth & Adult)
Skate Rental
Skate Sharpening
Summer Rental Pavilion
Season Tickets (Effective 10/1/87)
Resident Family
Resident Individual
Non-Resident Family
Non-Resident Individual
Classes (as of January 1, 1988)
Arena
(As of September) $ 80.00
75.00 .
60.00
2.50
.1.06
1.50
500.00/day
$52.00
32.00
62.00
37.. 00
40.00 ’
Gun RanPe
9/21/87
-_ 30
Pistol - 1/2 hour 4.00
25 Rounds Trap 4.50
Building - per hour 45.00
Season Tickets: Daily Admission:
Pool
Resident Family $44.00 Adult and Youth $2.50
Resident Individual 28.00
Non-Resident Family 50.00
Non-Resident Individual 33.00
Patron Cards:
Individual
Additional Family
Member
Computerized Handicaps'
Golf Cars :
18 Holes
9 Holes
Group Golf Lessons:
Adult
Junior
18 Hole Non-Patron
18 Hole Patron
9 Hole Non-Patron
9 Hole Patron
Group Fees
Group Fees 9 Hole
Group Car Fees
Adult Non-Patron
Adult Patron
Golf Car - everyone
Pall carts
Group Fee
Braemar Room:
Night Rate Resident
Night Rate Non-Res.
Braemar Golf Course
Lockers :
50.00 Hen's 72" 33.00
Hen's 42" 22.00
45.00 Ladies' 72" 14.00
10.50 Club Rental 5.00
Pull Carts 1.75
Golf Cars - Seniors:
18.00 18 Holes 15.00
9.50 9 Holes 8.00
44.00 Large Bucketball 3.75
22.00 Small Bucket/balls 2.50
Golf Range :
Warm Up Bucket 1.00
Braemar Green Fees
13.00 Seniors :
9.50 18 Hole Non-Patron 12.00
8.00 18 Hole Patron 8.50
6.50 9 Hole Non-Patron 7.50
9 Hole Patron 6.00 .
16.00
10.00
20.00
Ekecutive Course Green Fees
6.00 Sr. & Jr. Non-Patron 5.00
5.00 Sr. & Jr. Patron 4.00
6.00
1.75
7.00
Braemar Clubhouse
450.00 Day Rate Resident 225.00
500.00 Day Rate Non-Res. 275.00
Edinborough Park
Pool/Track/Skating:
Daily Pass - Youth and Adult
Annual Pass -- Individual
Annual Pass - Family
Lockers
Towels
Skate Rental
ParkRentals:
Edina Resident (per hour)
Arena 60.00
Grotto 60.00
Pool 110.00
Theatre 110.00
Great Hall 150.00
After Hour Rentals
(includes use of
Great Hall, Theatre,
Grotto and Arena 800.00
Program A $ 6.00
Progrim B 8.00
Box bch Program:
Program C 10.00
Catering Kitchen: (assessed for use
Groups size over 200 50.00
Groups size over 300 75.00
Groups size over 500 100.60
Exclusive all day use 2000.00
Commercial Use: (trade shows, etc.)
2.50
150.00
200.00 -
.25
.50
1.25
Non-Edina Resident (per hour)
Arena - 85.00
Grotto 85.00
Pool , 125.00
Theatre . 135.00
Great Hall 175.00
. After Hour Rentals
(includes use of
Great Hall, Theatre,
Grotto and Arena 1000.00
i
of kitchen)
Miscellaneous Charges :
Table set-ups in
Great Hall 15.00/table
Children's Birthday
Group size:
Parties in Arena: (includes space rental, skating, pool, track, set-up)
15 minirmrm 50.00
9/21/87
31
25 75.00
35 100.00
50 maximum 125.00
Braemar Ballfields:
General Park Areas:
Picnic Shelters:
Shomobile :
Rental of Athletic Field:
Portable Bleachers:
Recreational Picnic 'equipment
Tupa Park
Rentals
$ 35/hr - no lights
55/hr - With lights
50/hr - commercial use
35 up to 50 people
65 over 50 people (Lake Cornelia Pk)
30/game
50/game with lights
(i.e. TV commercials)
550/day
lOO/day or 50/hr + delivery charge
Free usage,
125/day
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted .
RESOLUTION SETTING AMBULANCE FEES
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the
following ambulance service fees:
Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and/or
transportation to a medical facility:
Level I - Basic Life Support (BTS) $235.00
AMBULANCE FEES
Vital signs
OXJrgen
Splinting - Backboard
Bandaging, etc.
I.V. Setups
Drug Therapy
EKG Monitoring
Mast Trousers
Extrication, etc.
Cardiac Arrest
Any problem needing Code 3 transport to hospital
Additional Charge for Transportation to Downtown Hospitals
Abbott/Northwestern, Minneapolis Children's Medical
Center, Mt. Sinai, Fairview (Lutheran) Deaconess,
Hennepin County Medical Center, Metropolitan Medical
Center, 'Fairview Riverside/St. Mary's, University of
Mbnesota, North Memorial Medical Center, Veterans'
Administration
Specialized medical services performed at scene with
no transportation involved.
Level I1 - Advanced Life Support (ALS)
Level I11 - Code 3 Transport (AIS)
On Scene Treatment 50.00
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
285.00
335.00
. '50.00
RESOLUTION ADOPTED ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION RATES.
Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby establish the following
salary schedule for fulltime personnel for 1988:
Step 1 step 2 Step 3 Step 4
$46 , 566 $50 , 648 $54 , 730 $58 , 214 Management I11
Management I1 36,880 37 , 856 40 , 872 43 , 472
Management I 29 , 302 31 , 876 34 , 450 36 , 634
Technical Management 26 , 754 29 , 068 31 , 408 33 , 410
Technical IV 23 , 608 25 , 714 27 , 742 30 , 732
Technical I11 21 , 398 23 , 270 25 , 142 26 , 780
21 , 008 22 , 828 24 , 648 26 , 234 Technical I1
Technical I 18 , 722 20 , 436 22 , 100
General I11 17 , 576 19 , 110 20 , 644 21,996
19 , 162 20 , 410 General I1 16 , 328 17 , 706
General I 14 , 508 15 , 756 17,030 * 18,148
Motion was made by Member
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION RATES
23,478 *
Public Safety:
PS Management I11
PS Management I1
PS Management I
PS General I1
PS General I
39,494 42 , 952 46 , 410 49 , 348
36 , 946 40,196 43 , 394 46 , 176
33,592 36,504 39 , 494 41 , 990
20 , 514 22 , 334 24 , 192 .25 , 688
16 , 328 17 , 706 19 , 162 20 , 402
.. 9/21/87 32
BE IT PClRTHEB RESOLVED that the City of Edina does hereby establish the following
compensation schedule for part-time personnel for 1988:
Year Round
Level A Level B
Step 1 $4.40 $4.80
Step 2 4.75 5.30
Step 3 5.00 5.80
Step 4 5.50 6.30
Step 5 6.00 6.80
Managerial 7.00 8.00
Level 1 $3.70
3.95
4.10
Level 2 ’ 3.85
4.15
4.25
Level 3 4.30
4.60
4.75
Level 4 4.60
4.85
5.00
Level 5 4.75
Rollcall: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Seasonal
CSOII Public Safety
$7 * 35
6.00
7.85
i
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to approve
payment of the following claims as per pre-list dated 9/21/87: General Fund
$1,111,950.82, Art Center $4,732.33, Swimming Pool Fund $4,115.04, Golf Course
Fund $16,408.22, Recreation Center Fund $9,591.77, Gun Range Fund $595.12,
Edinborough Park $13,858.85, Utility Fund $37,911.60, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$51,416.75, Construction Fund $109,677.78, Total $1,360,258.28.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. I 1
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, the meeting was adjourned
at 10~25 p.m. by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Turner and carried
1
unanimously.
%&%a - City Clerk .
i