Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19871019_regularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY H OCTOBER 19, 1987 49 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Turner and Mayor Courtney. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21 AND BUDGET MEETINGS OF SEPTEMBER 8. 15 AND 17, 1987 APPROVED. Motion vas made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 21, and Bu'dget Meetings of September 8, 15 and 17, 1987 as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote, three ayes. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR NOB HILL (MARNIE DEVELOPMENT, INC.): Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Craig Larsen presented the request of Marnie Development, Inc. for preliminary plat approval for Nob Hill, generally located south of West 66th Street and west of Highway 100. The subject property measures approximately 5.05 acres in size. Four property owners have combined all or portions of their property in this proposed subdivision. The subdivision would create five new buildable lots; Lots 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8 would be new lots and Lots 1, 5 and 6 would be retained for existing dwellings. 34,600 square feet in size with an average size of 29,795 square feet. The proposed new lots would be served by the extension of Nob Hill Drive; currently Nob Hill Drive exists to the southerly boundary of the property. Right of way for this extension was dedicated by the Oak Ridge of Edina plat. proposed plat meet or exceed the Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. Council the City commissioned Barr Engineering to do a storm water analysis of the area to determine impact of further development in the internal portion of the area. For purposes of analysis, Barr Engineering assumed 17 additional lots would be developed following the Oak Ridge of Edina plat which was significantly more dwellings that are now proposed. development of 17 new lots there would be adequate storm water capacity. Larsen advised that this request was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission on two occasions. with two failing to meet the standard for lot width. The Commission referred it back for study and also criticized the road grades and widths and requested more detail on the use of retaining walls that would be required. returned with a revised plat that complied with ordinance requirements, reduced the number of lots to five, reduced the grade for the proposed extension of Nob Hill Drive and provided a detailed plan as to how the retaining walls would be constructed. Given those revisions, the Commission recommended preliminary plat approval subject to: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) Grading permit from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and 4) Developer's agreement which would include specifications for retaining walls and a street width between 24 and 28 feet in order to save some of the trees. Mr. Larsen advised that Robert Engstrom, representing the developer, was present to respond to questions. Eva May, 5023 Knob Hill Drive, explained that she lives on the property adjacent to proposed Lot 8. retaining wall to be constructed and the potential traffic hazard because'of the grade incline of the street. Ed Curtiss, 5009 Nob Hill Drive, said that he was concerned about the retaining wall and the effect of the failure plane on the adjacent property as he felt there was an error in the sketch submitted by the consultant as to the actual street elevation. He added that he was also concerned about the capacity of the pond to contain water run-off in the future. Member Turner asked for an explanation of the proposed retaining walls and the pond capacity. and the road grades and the relationship to the Mae property. said that the Timber Ridge development has grades and conditions that are more severe in terms of construction. to hold the area that would meet the failure plane criteria. A second graphic illustrated the location and type of the trees on the site and indicated the right of way for both a 24 and 28 foot street. within the roadway construction area and that the grading plan could be modified before final plat approval. As to the pond, Engineer Hoffman explained that the water level is unusually high now because of the 11 inch rainfall this summer. There is an outfall pipe which allows storm water to drain down to Nine Mile Creek. support of the subdivision, Mr. Engstrom stated that he felt they had done an excellent job in responding to the concerns of the neighbors, had gone to considerable expense to retain the existing oak trees on the site and are proposing to develop it at less density than would be permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. Richard Schulze, 5015 Nob Hill Drive, said he was concerned about storm water run-off from the site and whether the existing storm sewer system would be adeouate to handle water cominE from two directions so that he would not Planner The new lots would range in size from approximately 23,200 to All lots in the At the time the Oak Ridge of Edina plat was considered and approved by the Their analysis concluded that even with the Planner The first proposal illustrated six new lots The proponents She expressed her concerns about the height and proximity of the Engineer Fran Hoffman presented a graphic showing the retaining walls In comparison, he He stated that a retaining wall could be built He noted that a number of trees are In 10/19/87 50 have water overflowing onto his property. In response, Engineer Hoffman explained that during hearings on the first subdivision, Oak Ridge of Edina, the City asked Barr Engineering to do a storm water analysis of the entire area and the impact of development on the pond. developed following the Oak Ridge of Edina plat and concluded that the additional development could occur without adversely impacting surrounding properties. said he had again talked with Barr Engineering regarding the subject development and the capacity of the pond. As to the existing storm sewer system, he said that no one designs a system to handle the abnormal 11 inch rainfall that was experienced this summer and if that type of event should occur again the same kind of flooding and soil erosion could be anticipated. adequately handled by adding more catch basins in the cul-de-sac to take the water down ints.the pipe. catch and hold water in the cul-de-sac. The Barr engineers concurred that because the cul-de-sac is not very long it would not contribute a high volume of water and that the system would be adequate in a normal rainfall. Nob Hill Drive, said one of the major concerns was access to the proposed subdivision. cul-de-sac and he asked if that was ever considered. He also asked if the retaining walls would be two-tiered. walls adjacent to Lot 2 are anticipated to be two-tiered. is proposed for the portion adjacent to the Christianson property. access from West 66th Street, he clarified that the Planning Commission did discuss that as an alternative but they felt the proposed access from the existing cul-de-sac was a reasonable approach to the development. this proposed subdivision represented full development for that area. Mr. Larsen said that at this point it does; the property owner to the west was asked if he were interested so that the whole area could be developed at this time. He has expressed no interest in being part of the subject development and wished his property to remain as is. Ron Oberpriller, 5000 Nob Hill Drive, voiced these concerns: 1) traffic safety with a 5.6 grade roadway, 2) capability for fire vehicles to turn around in the cul-de-sac, 3) whether an existing easement for right of way guarantee the right to develop any subdivision, 4) access should be- from West 66th Street. traffic issue was that the roadway should be 28 feet wide given that the oak trees could not be saved even if the roadway was constructed at 24 feet. provide for snow storage on each side. standard for the City and will accommodate fire vehicles normally used in residential areas. With regard to an existing easement for right of way, Manager Rosland.explained that the easement was created for potential future development, that each subdivision request must be heard by the Council at which time all factors are considered and that the Coyncil then either approves or denies the plat; an existing easement does not guarantee anything. Engineer Hoffman clarified that if the roadway is designed carefully it will fit more naturally into the hillside. on the uphill s5de but instead of a large cut it could be sloped up on the downhill side. cul-de-sac, the retaining walls and the free standing guard rail. Hoffman said that the developer must pay for all required improvements'to public facilities and that no part will be assessed to adjacent property owners. Curtiss said he had a grave concern for the mature oak trees and asked if preliminary plat approval would grant permission to begin cutting trees to clear the site. Watershed District permit to begin grading including cutting down of trees. Following preliminary plat approval by the Council and the obtaining oE the - permit, he would have the authority to begin grading and cutting.trees. Attorney Erickson advised that there are ordinance requirements for protection against erosion, etc. that must be implemented before grading and cutting can begin, that the Council does have the power to impose conditions on preliminary or final approval if they are not contrary to ordinance. Member Turner moved preliminary plat approval and adoption of the following resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1) Final plat approval. 2) Subdivision dedication, 3) Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit, 4) Execution of a Developer's Agreement to include plans and specifications for retaining walls and street width between 24 and 28 feet, 5) No trees would be cut or grading begun until final plat approval, and 6) That the City Engineer review and approve improvements to the storm water drainage system and the design of the roadway adjacent to the Mae property. commented that in looking at the proposed subdivision it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the density and lot size are consistent with-the neighborhood and that the lots are larger to account for the difficult topography. Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the subdivision request. That analysis assumed that 17 more lots would be He Normal rainfall could be Berming could also be provided on the down slope side to Jeff Christianson, 5008 One option suggested was accessing from West 66th Street with a Planner Larsen responded that the retaining A single retaining wall Regarding Member Turner asked if In response, Engineer Hoffman said the answer as to the This would The cul-de-sac with a 70 foot radius is As to the access, It would still result in a high retaining wall Mr. Curtiss asked who would pay for improvements to the Engineer Mr. Engineer Hoffman responded that the developer would need a Nine Mile No further comment being heard, Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Turner Mayor Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR CAHILL TOWNHOUSES. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered.placed on file. a lO/l9 /87 Sl Planner Larsen presented the request of Ron Clark Construction for final development plan and preliminary plat approval for Cahill Townhouses. property is located West of Cahill Road, south of Village Drive and north of Oak Glen Road, measures 2.05 acres in size and is developed with a single family dwelling which is in a state of disrepair. The property was zoned PRD-3 with the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance in 1984 with the provision that actual development plans for the property would have to go through the final development plan process. On April 15, 1985 the Council approved a final development plan and preliminary plat for the subject property. That plan called for a 26 unit, 3 story condominium building which was essentially identical to the Highpointe Condominiums immediately adjacent. The proponents have dropped that plan and have returned with new development plans for the property. illustrated a 17 unit townhouse development in three separate buildings; three units in Building A, six in Building B and eight in Building C. The revised plan is proposed at a density of 8.3 units per acre, while the 1985 plan was 12.7 units per acre. As a point of reference, the townhouse development to the northwest of the subject property is developed at 7.9 units per acre, Highpointe I is 11.5 units per acre and the townhouse/apartment project to the south and west (Oak Glen) is developed at 12 units per acre. All units are proposed as two level units plus a rear walkout level, with attached two-car garages. materials are primarily horizontal lap siding with some brick accents. Main floor areas range from 1,390 square feet to 1,584 square feet of living area. Planner Larsen explained that as proposed in 1985 several of the setbacks failed to meet Zoning Ordinance setback requirements. Prior to the hearing before the Community Development and Planning Commission a revised site plan was submitted that corrected all of the setback deficiencies and that was the plan that was reviewed by the Commission. recommended approval of the revised Final Development Plan which basically made some adjustments in the location from Cahill Road for Building A, moving Building B in to the east and slightly to the south and reduced the size of all units to conform to the required setbacks. Final Development Plan and Preliminary Plat subject to: 1) Final plat approval, 2) Execution of a Developer's Agreement, and 3) Subdivision dedication. Planner Larsen advised that the proponent, Ron Clark, was present to answer questions. Member Kelly asked what the market range of the development would be. response was that the units would be at $175,000+. Lowell Swanson, 5501 Village Drive, commented that when they purchased their condominium unit in Highpointe from Ron Clark they were under the impression that they would be sharing some of the amenities in the new proposed development and a caretaker, and had approved and agreed with the look of the proposed L-shaped building with a courtyard in the front which would be viewed from their unit. With'the proposed townhouses that will not occur. He said his other concerns were that this would be a 3-story complex, that a townhouse development would allow children while basically condominiums do not, and that they had received no notice about this major change and would like to review it before approval. that the walkout units would give the impression of three levels. The rules that apply in this case do not require that public notice be mailed; the requirement is that it must be heard before the Planning Commission with recommendation to the Council. caretaker and restriction on children would be private matters. As to required notification, the statutes requires a public hearing before the Council and that is also the time of public notice. before the Planning Commission. Darlene McDonald, resident of Highpointe, said she had talked with Mr. Clark and had told him they would like to have some input to be sure this building is compatible with Highpointe. concerned about their view to the south and if they would be facing a road. Clark, the developer, compared the 1985 proposal with the revised plan under consideration. plan are 2-story from the front and 2 1/2-story from the rear which gives the entire project a lower profile. units compared to the present plan downsized to 17 townhouse units. out that, obviously, there will be less traffic, a lessor amount of on-grade parking and asphalt and driveway. Clark said that this is a separate parcel from Highpointe. When the association for Highpointe was set up, he retained the right that when the next building was built he could combine the associations into one association if that was more efficient. not make sense to combine them, it would be set up with its own association. Because the proposal now is for townhomes, it would not be feasible to combine ,the associations because the two will be different kinds of properties. As to sharing amenities, he said there were none to share. He recalled a conversation regarding possibly sharing a caretaker if the second condominium building was constructed. Mr. Clark concluded his remarks by saying that he hoped the Council would look favorably on his request for approval so that they could do the grading before the cold weather. Highpointe as to their concerns. should have its own character. submitted. The subject The revised plan Exterior At its meeting of September 30, 1987 the Commission The Commission recommended approval of the The In response, Planner Larsen said Attorney Erickson stated that the issues of shared amenities and Prior notice is not required for hearings She also said she was Ron The 1985 plan was for a 3-story condominium building. The present In looking at density, the 1985 plan was for 26 He pointed With regard to the comments about sharing, Mr. If it was deemed to be a different kind of a project or that it did He said he would be open to talking with the residents of He added that architecturally each project Member Turner asked if a landscape plan had been Planner Larsen said that plans have been submitted and appear at or 10/19/87 -_ 52 above minimum standards and would be reviewed before a building permit is issued. No further comment being heard, Member Turner moved Final Development Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval and adoption of the following resolutions, subject to: 1) Fhal plat approval, 2) Execution of a Developer's Agreement, and 3) Subdivision dedication: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Cahill Townhouses, submitted by Ron Clark Construction, generally located west of Cahill Road, south of Village Drive and north of Oak Glen Road, be and is hereby approved. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESOLUTION GRBNTING PREIJHINARY PLAT FOR CAHILTi TOWNHOUSES I BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Cahill Townhouses", platted by Ron Clark Construction, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of October 19, 1987, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolutions adopted. *COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDED FOR OUTLOT B. INDIAN HILLS ARROWHEAD ADDITION. The proposed amendment would change the designation of Outlot By Indian Hills Arrowhead Addition from Park to Single Family Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Single Family plat for the property, Pondwood Estates. by the Planning Commission and is consistent with Council discussions of the property several months ago. for adoption of the following resolution: The change would be consistent with the recently approved The change was recommended Motion of Member Turner vas seconded by Member Kelly RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO CITY OF EDINB COHPREZENSIVE PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approved and adopts the following Amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan 1980/90: Designation for Outlot B, Indian Hills Arrowhead Addition is changed from Park to Single Family Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Hap. Motion carried on rollcall vote, three ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH STREET LIGHTING. Motion of Member Turner vas seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Edinborough Street Lighting to recommended low bidder, Collins Electric, at $117,148.00. Motion carried on rollcall'vote, three ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES 'OF 10/13/87 APPROVED. seconded by Member Turner to approve...the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Raffic Safety Committee Minutes of October 13, 1987: 1) Installation.of "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs on the west side of Xerxes Avenue from 6616 through 6628, 2) Installation of advlsory "ONCOMING TRdppIC DOES NOT STOP" signs below the existing stop signs on southbound Valley View Road at County Road.62,' and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion of Member Kelly was Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. LMC 1988 PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE POLICIES TO BE DISCUSSED 11/2/87. advised the Council that the LMC 1988 Proposed Legislative Policies are being reviewed by Department Heads as to how the proposed legislation may,affect the City. discussion by the Council at its meeting of November 2, 1987 in preparation for the LMC Policy Meeting on November 18. Member Turner mentioned that she would also like to have the Council look at key legislative policies of the AMM and the MLC so that the positions of all three organizations could be discussed at the same time. Rosland said the MLC is meeting on October 21 and that he would have information on the MLC's legislative policies for the next meeting. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT EAST BUSH LAKE ROAD AND WEST 78TH STREET APPROVED. previously approved the plans for construction of a traffic signal at East Bush Lake Road and West 78th Street; A cost estimate has been submitted by Hennepin County which is considerably more than originally estimated. However, the City has been advised that its allocation of State Aid funds will be approximately $80,000 more than expected so that funds will be available for the project. He recommended approval of the cooperative agreement. Motion of Member Turner vas seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Wnnesota, adopted a resolution on July 20, 1987 approving the plan submitted by Hennepin County for the improvement and signalization of the intersection of East Bush Lake Road and West 78th Street; and Manager Rosland He said he would prepare comments on the legislation for consideration and She said she would prepare information on the AMM's policies. Manager I No action was taken. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Council had . 53 u-) I m a WHEREAS. Hennepin County has submitted for Council approval a revised Construction Cooperative Agreement No. 43-11-87, County State Aid Highvay 28, Hennepin County Project 8529 for the above named project; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, does approve Construction Cooperative Agreement No. 43-11-87, subject to the condition that the City's share of the cost of the project be funded from municipal State Aid funds; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PARK & RECREATION TASK FORCE MEMBERS DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland recalled that an element of the 1987-1988 Strategic Work Plan is the establishment of a task force to review the City's Park and Recreation facilities and programs. is to be comprised of three Park Board members and eight citizens - two from each quadrant of the City. individuals for the task force so that appointment could be accomplished at the meeting of November 2. Absent members will be advised and asked to also submit names and the matter will be placed on the Council Agenda for November 2, 1987. This task force He suggested that the Council members submit names of PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING BRAEMAR GOLF LEAGUE POLICIES DISCUSSED: CONTINUED TO 11/2/87. recommendation of the Park Board as stated in their minutes of October 13, 1987 that the Council accept the "City of Edina Park and Recreation Department Proposed Braemar Golf League Policies" as presented at their meeting. proposed in order to facilitate the growing demands of residents wanting to participate in league play and still give adequate numbers of open golf time. is recommended that the proposed new policies be started with the 1990 season which would give adequate time for affected leagues and golfers to make adjustments in their membership and rules. Basically, the policies are: 1) All golf league members must be residents; present non-residents may continue through 1989; 2) Beginning with 1990, all league members are limited to only one league or division; 3) All league membership shall be capped at present limitations, 4) It may become necessary to adjust day of play and/or starting times; and 5) Beginning with 1990, the National Car Rental, Hennepin County and Singles leagues will be eliminated. Manager Rosland suggested that the golf league policies be publicized in the Edina Sun-Current prior to Council action to avoid criticism that golfers did not know this was proposed. Member Turner commented that this matter should be held until the meeting of November 2, 1987. continue the matter to the Council meeting of November- 2, 1987. Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to the The policies are It It was informally agreed to NO ACTION TAKEN ON TAX-FORFEITED LANDS LIST 705-NC. Manager Rosland called to the attention of the Council a list of tax-forfeited Lands (List 705-NC) received from Hennepin County with the request that the Council take action to approve the parcels for public auction, auction to adjacent owners or request a conveyance to the City for public use. 1) 06-116-21-21-0005 - Bradley Investment Co. - repurchase amount of $228,449.41 of which $201,075.98 represents special assessments; 2) 06-116-21-21-0006 - Edina Lodge No. 343 - repurchase amount of $55,758.66 of which $52,060.49 represents special assessments with interest, 3) 33-117-21-22-0086 - Robert T. Schmidt - single family lot, and 4) 19-028-24732-0009 - State Land Dept. - small strip of land adjacent to a developed lot. Manager Rosland said that with regard to the two parcels on which there are unpaid special assessments the concern is that if the parcels are auctioned the City may not recover the special assessments. There is no apparent need by the City for conveyance for public use. of staff is that the City take no action on these parcels at this time. The Council has a ninety day period from October 9, 1987 to act and by taking no action it leaves the door open for potential development. taken. He presented the following data on the parcels: The recommendation No formal action was HEARING DATE SET FOR IMPROVEMENT NOS. P-C-145 AND P-BA-279. Motion of Member Turner vas seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEBRING ON GRADING & R.O.U. IMPROVEMENT NO. P-C-145 AND PERWANEM: STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO.'P-BA-279 1. the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, November 2, 1987, at 7:OO p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official nevspaper once a week for tvo successive veeks, the second of which publication is to be not less The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, 10/ 19/87 than three days from the date of said meeting, an^ to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITP OF EDINA 4801U. 50th Street Edina, lfinnesota 55424 NOTICE-OF PUBLIC HEARING GRADING & R.O.W. IMPROVEMENT NO. P-C-145 PFXWNENT STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. P-BA-279 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, November 2, 1987 at 7:OO p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: The ESTIMAmD COST GRADING & R.O.U. IMPROVEMENT NO. 6-145 $273,352.58 PEWANENT STREET SURFACING IHTROVEMENT NO. BA-279 $436,726.92 The projects are proposed to be funded by State Aid Gas Tax Funds. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Rollcall : I Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ! CONDOLENCES EXPRESSED TO ASSISTANT MANAGER. of the death of the father-in-law of Gordon Hughes, Assistant Manager. Member Rzrner was seconded by Member Kelly expressing condolences to Gordon Hughes, 011 behalf of the Council, on the death of his father-in-law, Marvin Teigert . Manager Rosland informed the Council Motion of i I 1 Motion carried unanimously. AMENDMENT TO JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CDBG PROGRAM APPROVED. County for action by the Council on an amendment to the Joint Cooperation Agreement with the county for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. program with Hennepin County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Recently, HUD has made some language changes to which the county must respond. The amendment basically does the following: a) defines the term "Metropolitan City", b) satisfies assurance that the Agreement will be effective for however long it takes to expend granted funds, c) satisfies that all participants are bound by the required certification of compliance, d) satisfies requirements relative to program income, and e) satisfies the requirement of setting forth standards applicable to activities of real property acquisition or improvement. Staff would recommend approval of the amendment. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have executed a Joint Cooperation Agreement, County Contract No. 70467, for the purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Hausing and Urban Development Conmnrnity Development Block Grant program for Fiscal Years 1988, 1989 and 1990; BE IT PURTHW RESOLVED, that Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Cooperation Agreement, County Contract No. 70467 be approved, and that the Mayor and the Manager be authorized to sign Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the City. Planner Craig Larsen advised that a request was received from Hennepin He explained that the agreement regulates the administration of the RESOLUTION I I Rollcall : Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney j Resolution adopted. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly to approve papent of the following claims as per pre-list dated 10/19/87: $339,889.89, Art Center $11,783.98, Swimming Pool Fund $1.30, Golf Course Fund $17,467.61, Recreation Center Fund $3,828.15, Gun Range Fund $1,586.75, Edinborough Park $9,825.78, Utility Fund $17,616.41, Liquor Dispensary Fund $75,178.08, Construction Fund $75,189.63, Total $552,367.58. General Fund I Motion carried on rollcall vote, three ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for adjournment. Adjournment at 9:25 p.m. %A%- w City Clerk