HomeMy WebLinkAbout19900820_regularOF TBE
ED= CITY
ROLLCAKL Answering rollcall were
Kelly.
D.A.R.E. OPFICERS COMMENDED Sgt.
HINOTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
COlJNCIL HELD AT CITY HALT.
AUGUST 20, 1990
161
Members Paulus, 'Rice, Smith and Mayor Pro-Tem
Ken Kane and Officers Chris Eidem and Phil
Larsen were commended for their work in introducing the Drug Abuse Resistance
Education (D.A.R.E.) program into two Edina elementary schools. '
CONSENT AGENDA ITEPIS ADOPTED
Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Rollcall :
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ALIXY PAVING IWROVEKEN!C NO. E-32 CONTINUED TO 9/4/90
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Engineer Hoffman stated that the City received a petition from residents
requesting review of the condition of the alley located south of West 51st Street
between Oxford and Bedford Avenues. Staff has prepared a public hearing notice
for a concrete paving project as the best long term solution.
with some of the residents, most would prefer a lower cost solution and asphalt
paving would be their preference.
use the alley and do not desire to pay for any alley paving.
presented showing the addresses, garage use and location of properties abutting
the alley and indicating those properties in support of the project.
However, in talking
Also, all residents 'abutting the alley do not
Graphics were
Estimated range of proposed assessment per lot is $1,211.78 to $2,120.61 for
concrete, depending on assessment against 8 lots or 14 lots. The estimated range
of proposed assessment per lot is $712.10 to $1,246.17 for asphalt paving,
depending on assessment against 8 lots or 14 lots. Staff would recommend
assessment against 14 lots because of potential use of the alley by any abutting
property or service to any property by service vehicles.
would be spread over ten years.
The proposed assessment
Options presented for consideration were: a) no build, b) concrete alley assessed
against 14 lots at estimated cost of $1,211.78 per lot, c) bituminous alley
assessed against 14 lots at estimated cost of $712.10 per lot, and d) temporary
bituminous alley assessed against 8 lots at estimated cost of $1,246.17.
It was noted that a letter in support for the project was received from David A.
Morris, 5116 Bedford Avenue. Letters objecting to the project were received from
Debra Strege, 5113 Oxford; John P. Madgett, property owner at 5104 Bedford, and
David B. Olson, 5125 Oxford. A petition in opposition was signed by residents at
5101 Oxford, 5109 Oxford, 5113 Oxford, 5125 Oxford, 5104 Bedford, 5108 Bedford and
5128 Bedford.
Speaking in support of the project were: David Morris, 5116 Bedford; Clement
Bieker, property owner of 5129-5131 Oxford; David Battle, 5108 Bedford; and Connie
Wasley, 5120 Bedford. Speaking in opposition were: Jewel Olson, 5125 Oxford; and
Jon and Nancy Wilbur, 5100 Bedford.
Member Smith commented that, because the original petition presented was to
investigate alternatives towards pavement of the alley and not a petition to the
Council for the project, he would like to continue the hearing so such a petition
could be circulated and brought back to the Council.
Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing to the Council Meeting of
September 4, 1990, to allow time for a petition to be circulated that vould
81 20/90 162
specifically request the improvement of the alley, cost of which would be assessed
against benefitted properties.
Ayes: Rice, Smith, Kelly
Nays: Paulus
Motion carried.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
PUBLIC HE3RING CONDUCTED: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S-50 APPROVED Affidavits of
Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
this public hearing is on the construction of a sidewalk on Valley Lane along the
South side from approximately 110' east of the centerline of Doron Lane easterly
to the So0 Line Railroad tracks; Ridgeview Drive along the south and west side
from the So0 Line Railroad to West 66th Street; West 66th Street along the north
side from Ridgeview Drive to Warren Avenue. The hearing has been called as a
result of a petition from 24 residents in the area who would like Ridgeview Drive
become a safer street for pedestrians. The section of proposed sidewalk between
Creek Drive west to the existing sidewalk was added to the project by staff to
complete a partial link of the total from Tracy Avenue to Normandale Park.
Under current City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk would be the
responsibility of the City.
$60,956.13 which would be funded by state aid gas tax funds. The-sidewalk is
proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. Alignment will be
varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible.
sidewalk is proposed to be constructed in late 1990 or early 1991.
Engineer Hoffman said
The estimated construction cost of the project is
The
Speaking in opposition to the project were: Bob Kimmel, 5521 Valley Lane (opposed
sidewalk on Valley Lane from Doran Lane to Creek Drive); Leland James, 6544 Warren
Avenue (sidewalk construction would leave them with only 11-12 feet of driveway);
Leigh Marquardt, 5501 Valley Lane (presented petition from residents on Valley
Lane and Creek Drive in opposition to sidewalk on Valley Lane); Gordon Hoff, 5517
Valley Lane (opposed sidewalk on Valley Lane); and George and Mary Simms, 6501
Valley Lane. A letter of opposition to sidewalk construction along Valley Lane
from Jack and Mary Ann Heinen, 6501 Limerick Drive was noted.
Speaking in support of the project were: Nancy and Gary Braun, 6508 Ridgeview
Drive; Lee Schubert, 5509 Valley.Lane; Richard Novack, 6521 Ridgeview Drive;
Gerald Augst, 6524 Ridgeview Drive; Mark Lawrence, 6512 Ridgeview Drive and Nancy
Peters, 6505 Ridgeview Circle. A letter in support of the sidewalk from H. Jed
Hepworth and Lee Hepworth Schubert, 5509 Valley Lane was noted.
Member Paulus moved adoption of a resolution ordering Sidewalk Improvement No.
S-50 from the end of existing walk on Valley Lane to Normandale Park on West 66th
Street -
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Member Paulus then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly mailed to owners of each parcel
within the affected area on the following proposed improvement:
RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEUATX IMPROVEMENT S-50
SIDEWALK IMPROVIDENT NO. S-50 - South side of Valley Lane from Creek Drive
easterly to the So0 Line Railroad Tracks; Ridgeview Drive along the south and
west side from the So0 Line Railroad to West 66th Street
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully
advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the
construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary
in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for
construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby
8/20/90 163
designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT NO. S-50, cost of which shall be paid from Hunicipal State Aid Funds.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly
Nays: Rice
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMEJCC NO. BA-292 ORDERED
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Engineer Hoffman stated that the City has received a petition for street surfacing
with concrete curb and gutter to service the new project called "The Lincoln" on
Lincoln Drive.
assessed against the property of the petitioners at $81.01 per lineal foot over a
ten year period. The proposed project would be constructed late in 1990 or early
1991.
Estimated cost for the project is $82,013.92 proposed to be
Speaking in support of the project was petitioner Norman P. Bjornnes, Jr. No
other comments or objections were heard.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of
each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed
improvement :
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEBENT
STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB h GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-292
From South Lot Line of Lot 1, Block 1, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition
South to mid-block of Lot 2, Block 2, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully
advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the
construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary
in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for
construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby
designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: STREET
SURPBCING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-292, and the area to be
specially assessed therefor shall include:
All of Lot 1, Block 2, and that part of Lot 2, Block 2, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD
ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows:
Lots
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence South 0 degrees 02
minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the West line of said Lot 2,
a distance of 207.17 feet; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds
East, a distance of 355.00 feet; thence North 41 degrees 34 minutes 58
seconds East, a distance of 199.34 feet to the Easterly line of said Lot 2;
thence North 40 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds West, along the Easterly line
of said Lot 2, a distance of 13.61 feet to a point of curve in said Easterly
line; thence Northwesterly a distance of 58.23 feet along said Easterly
line, being a tangential curve, concave to the East, having a radius of
323.28 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 19 minutes 13 seconds, to the
Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence North 89 degrees 58.minutes 00
seconds West, a distance of 445.01 feet, along the North line of said Lot 2
to the point of beginning.
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the -
recorded plat thereof.
"hose parts of Lot 2, Block 2, Outlot A and vacated Lincoln Drive, all in
INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, described .
as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1; thence South 77
degrees 07 minutes 56 seconds West, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a
8/ 20 /30 164
distance of 227.31 feet in the northwest corner of said Lot 1, being the
point of beginning of the land being described; thence South 0 degrees 11
minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 92.00 feet; thence South 52 degrees 25
minutes 51 seconds Vest, a distance of 186.55 feet to an intersection with
the northerly extension of the west lines of Lots 29 through 35, in said
Block 1; thence South 0 degrees 11mirmtes 19 seconds East, along said
extended line, a distance of115.00 feet to the northwest comer of Lot 35 in
said Block 1; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance
of 155.00 feet to the westerly line of said vacated Lincoln Drive; thence
southerly along said westerly line of vacated Lincoln Drive to the southeast
corner of Lot 34, in said Block 1; thence east to the southwest comer of
Lot 5, in said Block 1, being the easterly line of vacated Lincoln Drive;
thence northerly along said easterly line of vacated Lincoln Drive, to the
point of beginning.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEBRING CONCLUDED: AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES
EIJQENT (PARKS - JUPITEX AND BEYOND) ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file.
hearing for the Comprehensive Plan amendment was continued from July 16, 1990 to
allow for comments from the Metropolitan Council.
favorable and the City has been advised that it may place the amendment into
effect immediately.
The Park Board approved the new Park and Recreation Plan, Jupiter and Beyond, and
referred it on May 8, 1990 to the Community Development and Planning Commission
for public hearing.
1990 and voted to recommend adoption of the Plan.
was heard.
Planner Larsen stated that the public
Those comments have been
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17,
No public comment or objection
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING COMMUNITIES FACILITIES
EIEKENT TO THE COMPREHEMSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina adopeed the Comprehensive Plan 1980
on December 21, 1981, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development and Planning Commission of the City of Edina
has on June 17, 1990 approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980; and
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Edina has reviewed such amendment and is
in concurrence with the decision of the Community Development and Planning
Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that it
hereby adopts as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980, community facilities
element, the Park Plan "Jupiter and Beyond".
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEBRIPJG ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LINDELL ADDITION CONTINUED TO
9/4/90 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Lindell
Addition located at 7017 Antrim Road. The subject property is a developed single
family lot 66.,500 square feet in area. The proposed subdivision would create one
new buildable lot with an area of 31,000 square feet.
house would have an area of 35,500 square feet. Both lots exceed the median size
and dimensions of the 500 foot neighborhood as provided for in Ordinance No. 804
and no variances are required.
The lot for the existing
8/20/90 165
The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the proposed plat in
public hearing on August 1, 1990. Discussion focused on these issues: 1)
drainage, both existing and future following development, and 2) access to the new
lot.
these conditions: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, 3) utility
connection charges, 4) drainage pattern from new lot be approved by City Engineer,
5) new lot have access only to Antrim Road, and 6) installation of silt fence
during construction.
The Planning Commission recommended preliminary plat approval subject to
Henry Langer, 7101 Antrim Court, expressed his concern about runoff from the new
lot coming down Antrim Road and onto his property.
that the solution to the problem would be a change in the driveway grade to keep
the runoff water going down the street.
Member Paulus made a motion to continue the hearing on preliminary plat approval
for Lindell Addition to September 4, 1990 so that the City Engineer could conduct
a review of drainage on Antrim Road relating to the property immediately to the
south. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Engineer Hoffman explained
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
*PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO PCD-2.
PLANNED COMMERICAL DISTRICT - JERRY'S ENTERPRISES/OPUS CONTINUED TO 9/4/90 Motion
was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the public
hearing on Preliminary Rezoning from Planned Industrial District to PCD-2, Planned
Commercial District - Jerry's Enterprises/Opus, to September 4, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR RENEWAL OF BOILW INSURANCE
was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for renewal of the City's
boiler/machinery equipment insurance to recommended low bidder, Travelers, at
$6,053.00.
Motion was made by Member Smith and
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TEE OASES FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid %or six tee oases for
Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape Contractors, at
$13,792.00.
Motion was made by Member
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 8/14/90 APPROVED
Rice to approve the following recommended actions listed in Section A of the
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 14, 1990:
1) To install advisory signs at Ayrshire Boulevard, to reinstall the crossvalk
and signing on Doncaster Way, to ask the Council for a temporary path on the north
side of Ayrshire in the park area, to add "STOP" signs for southbound traffic at
Doncaster Way and Ayrshire and to advise Council to be receptive to a petition for
sidewalk in this neighborhood.
2) To install universal "pedestrian warning" signs on Kemrich Drive, to
centerline stripe Kemrich Drive west of Lanham and on the vest side of Fleetwood
Drive - 150' aldng Kemrich at each intersection, to encourage clearview
compliance, to refer to traffic enforcement study and enforce where necessary, and
to install "YIELD" signs as a reminder to residents on Fleetwood Drive and Lanham
Lane,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Motion was made by Member
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
REPORT PRESENTED ON PROPOSED 49 1/2 STREET PARKING RAMP PROJECT Assistant Manager
Gordon Hughes presented a report on the proposed 49 1/2 Street Parking Ramp
166 8/20/90
Project which the Council had approved on June 4, 1990.
hearing, staff and representatives of the business community have met to discuss
design elements of the ramp. It was suggested that the City develop retail
storefronts on the frontage of the ramp to: 1) increase retail presence'on 49 1/2
Street, and 2) to improve the facade of the ramp.
Since the project I
Staff has studied this concept and would recommend to the Council that staff
proceed with ramp design without inclusion of the retail store fronts.
believed that the disadvantages of including storefronts outweigh the advantages
for these reasons:
Staff
1) Feasibilitv - Jackson, Scott & ASSOC., retail consultants, recommended that
2)
the City not consider adding retail in this location.
Set-back Variance -
facility.
the northerly extreme of the site with zero setback.
Besign and Cost Issues - If retail storefronts were included, the facility
would be enclosed on at least three sides. Such design would require
ventilation and sprinkler equipment, cost of which would offset any revenues
gained.
Proiect Schedule - Present plans are to proceed with final design and solicit
bids for the work this winter. If the retail concept were to be pursued it
would necessitate a redesign effort and method to sell/review project plans
for retail.
The site is extremely small for construction of a parking
Retail storefronts would necessitate relocating the structure to
3)
4)
Speaking in opposition to the ramp being setback to the north property line were;
Lee Arnold, 3947 W. 49th Street and Ted Dean, owner of 3925-27 West 49th Street,
who said their street has been deteriorating since the establishment of the group
home on W. 49th Street.
Member Smith made a motion to reject the design concept of retail storefronts as
part of the 49 1/2 Street Parking Ramp Project.
Rice.
Motion was seconded by Member
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
*NAMES TO BE SUBMITTED FOR AD HOC COMMITTEE ON ALTERNATIVE REVENUE SOURCES
Manager Rosland reminded the Council Members to submit names to Mayor Richards for
the Ad Hoc Committee on Alternative Revenue Sources.
*ELEXRING DATE OF 9/17/90 SET FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the.following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEBRINGS
FOR VARIOUS IMPROVWEN!I!S
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of'the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for
the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing form hereinafter recorded, and
the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and
parcels of land vithin the districts affected by said improvements, and said
proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby
approved and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to
public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of
Hearing form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the
Clerk's action in publishing notice of said hearings in the official newspaper in
accordance vith lav is hereby approved.
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MEFNESOTA
PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR:
Notices belng as follows:
8/20/90 167
lW3THUNCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M-90
WATERMAIN IMPROVEWNT NO. WH-370
TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEWNT NO. TR.-90
AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-90
STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. L-33, L-34
STREET IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA-282, BA-283, BA-284, BA-287, BA-288
Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at
4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on September 17, 1990, at 7:OO P.M. to hear,
consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to proposed special
assessments for the following improvements:
1. -CE IMPROVEMENT NO. M-90
50th Street and France Avenue Business District
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Woodland Road to service: 10 and 11 Woodland Road
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
TOTAL AMOTJNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follovs:
All
parcels contained within the 50th and France Avenue Business District.
$42,338.24
2. WATERHBIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WH-370
Lots 10
and 11, COLONIAL GROVE ADDITION. (19-028-24-13-0013) (19-028-24-13-0014)
$7,300.44
3. TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-90
West 74
feet of that part of Lot 17 lying South of the North 10 feet thereof, AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION NO. 259 (28-117-21-21-0043); South 85.5 feet of North 306.5 feet of
West 200 feet of Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 except road, SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP
117, RANGE 21 (32-117-21-31-0001); Lot 3 and East 65 feet of Lot 1, Block 1,
MCPHERSON ADDITION (32-117-21-31-0042); north 100 feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH
HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION (18-028-24-44-0024) Lot 37,
2ND ADDITION (18-028-24-44-0050); Lot 1, Block 3, EIXWOOD TERRACE ADDITION
(19-028-24-11-0030); Lot 6, Block 8, FAIRFAX ADDITION (19-028-24-31-0074).
4. AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-90
Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Mill Pond and Indianhead Lake
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Eden Prairie Road from Kaymar Drive to Blake Road
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
through 7, Block 1, JONES' KN0I;LS ADDITION; Lots 9 through 13, Block 2, VALLEY
PARK ADDITION; all units in APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 190, PARKWOOD MANOR
CONDOMINIUMS; all units in APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 76, WHITEHALL, A CONDOMINIUM;
all units in APAR!MENT OWNJXRSHIP NO. 189, PARKWOOD VIEW CONDOMINIUM.
$3,215.50
All lots
I
reparian to Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond.
$13,871.50
5. STREET LIGHTING TPIPROVEMENT NO. L-33
Lots 4
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Delaney Boulevard from Dewey Hill Road to West 78th Street
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
through 3, Block 2, SMISEX ADDITION; all units in APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 99,
WINDWOOD EDINA CONDOMINIUMS; Lots 1 through 6, Block 1; Lots 1 through 6, Block 2;
Lots 1 through 6, Block 3; Lots 1 through 6, Block 4; Lot 1, Block 5, PONDWOOD
ADDITION; Lots 1 through 11, Block 1; Lots 1 through 19, 26, 27, Block 3, DEWEY
HILT,, SECOND ADDITION; all units in APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 291, DEWEY HILL WEST, A
CONDOMINIUM; all units in APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 324, DEWEY HILT,, EAST, A
CONDOMINIUM, Lots 1 through 51, Block 1, FOSTER GREEN SECOND ADDITION.
$3,939.47
6. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-34
Lots 1
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills West Addition
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
through 11, Block 1, INDIAN HILI23 WEST ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
$2,551.77
7. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-282
Lots 1
$38,245.58
I
8/20/90 168
8. STREET IMPR0V"T NO. BA-283
Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to Pine Grove Road
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement ,s as follows: Lot 8,
Block 1; Lot 8, Block 2, PAMWOOD KNOLIS 3RD ADDITION; Lots 1, 2, 12, 13, Block 1,
PARKWOOD KNOIJS 5TEf ADDITION: Lot 9, Block 1, PARKUOOD KNOLTS 6TH ADDITION: Lot 9,
Block 1; Lot 9, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLIS 7TH ADDITION; Lots 10, 11, 12, Block 1,
PARKUOOD KNOIJS 8TEf ADDITION: Lot 1, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2, IDYLWOOD ADDITION;
Lots 1 through 5, Block 1, IDYLWOOD 5TH ADDITION; Lot 4, Block 2; Lot 5, Block 3,
LUCE HIGHUOOD ADDITION; Lots 16, 17, Block 1, LES ANDERSON'S HIGHUOOD 2ND
ADDITION; Lots 1, 8, Block 1, VALLEY PARK ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, JONES' KNOW
ADDITION; that part of Tract A lying Southerly and Westerly of the plat of Jones'
Knolls, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 194; all units in APARTMENT ORNERSHIP NO. 189,
PARKWOOD VIEW CONDOMINIUM; Tract By REGISTERED IAND SURVEY NO. 1286 and part of
Lot 10, Block 1, Parkvood Knolls 8th Addition (31-117-21-14-0057)
(31-117-21-14-0058); Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1286.
9. STREET IMPROVEME" NO. BA-284
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
$508,874.94
All
units in THE VILTAGE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LBKES CONDOMINIUM, CONDOMINIUM NO. 641;
Lots 1, 2, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, Block 3; Lot 1, Block 4, Outlot By Outlot D, SOUTH
EDINA DEVELO-.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Fox Meadow Lane from existing cul-de-sac to 200 feet West
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
Pinewood Trail from Shemood Avenue to cul-de-sac
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:
$164,425.65
10. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-287
Lots 1
through 3, Block 1, OAK PONDS OF INTWLBCHEN 2ND ADDITION I $27,040.57
11. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-288
Lots 1
through 4, Block 1, PINEWOOD ADDITION
These proposed assessment rolls are now on file in the office of the City Clerk
and are open to public inspection.
APPEBL
Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the
City of Edina vithin thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City
Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days
after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is
filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the
presiding officer at the hearing.
DEFERRAL
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and
guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by
persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain
deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close
of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in
the first paragraph of this notice.
forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
$14,195.10
However, no appeal may be taken as to an
.
For further information and application
I Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR T.J.'S OF EDINA Motion was made by Member Smith and
was seconded by Member Rice approving issuance of a 3.2 On-sale Beer License to
T.J.'s of Edina, 7100 Brmmdson Road.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
8/20/90 169
*HEARING DATE OF 9/4/90 SET FOR VACATION OF DRAINAGE/UTILITY EASEMENTS ON LOTS
1,2.3.4.5. BLOCK 1. RJTERLBCHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION CALTJNG PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EBSEMENTS FOR DJUINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota as follows:
1.
drainage and utility purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance
with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 106.29:
I
It is hereby found and determined that the following described easements for
Existing drainage and utility easements over the westerly 10 feet of Lots 1,
2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD BDDITION, being those
dedicated in the plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
2.
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun-Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
421.851.
This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC EEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINJ!XSOTA
NOTICE IS BEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
September 4, 1990 at 7:OO p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the
proposed vacation of the following easements for drainage and utility purposes:
Existing drainage and utility easements over the westerly 10 feet of Lots 1,
2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, INTERIACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, being those
dedicated in the plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed vacation of easements is in the public interest and should be
made shall be heard at said time and place.
to which such proposed easements vacation affects existing easements within the
area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto,
for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
The Council shall consider the extent
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*HEARING DATE SET OF 9/4/90 FOR VACATION OF EBSEMENTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES ON PART
OF OUTLOT A. INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
Motion vas made by Member Smith and
RESOLUTION CALTJNG PUBLIC JEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota as follows:
1.
public park lands, public open space and storm water pond and holding area should
It is hereby found and determined that the following described easements for
8/20/90
be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 106.29:
That part of Outlot A, I" HILIS 3RD ADDITION according to the
recorded plat thereof, which lies east of the northerly extension of the west
lines of Lots 29 through 35, Block 1, in said INTERIACHEN HII;LS 3RD ADDITION.
2.
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a veek for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun-Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
421.851.
This Council shall meet at the the and place specified in the form of notice
Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
IN TBE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, KtNNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801W. 50th Street on
September 4, 1990 at 7:OO p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the
proposed vacation of the following easements for public purposes:
That part of Outlot A, INTERLACHEN HILIS 3RD ADDITION according to the
recorded plat thereof, yhich lies east of the northerly extension of the west
lines of Lots 29 through 35, Block 1, in said INTERLACHEN HILTS 3RD ADDITION.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed vacation of easements is in the public interest and should be
made shall be heard at said time and place.
to which such proposed easements vacation affects existing easements within the
area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto,
for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or a11 of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
I The Council shall consider the extent
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*HEXRING DATE OF 9/4/90 SET FOR VACATION OF EASEMFCNTS FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
(GALLERIA)
adoption of the following resolution:
Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for
RESOLUTION C-G PIJBUC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EBSKMENTS FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ed-, Hennepin County,
Minnesota as follows:
1.
utility purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 106.29:
It is hereby found and determined that the following described easements for
The West Sixteen (16) feet of the East Six Hundred Forty-eight (648) feet
of the South Two Hundred Eighty-two and Ninety-one Hundredths (282.91)
feet and the East Eight (8) feet of the West One Thousand Two Hundred
Forty-six and Fifty-one Hundredths (1246.51) feet (except the North
Twenty-seven (27) feet thereof and the South Two Hundred Eighty-two and
Ninety-one Hundredths (282.91) feet thereof) all in Tract "J" Registered
Land Survey Number Six Hundred Tventy-nine (629), Hennepin County,
8/20/90 171
Minnesota, recorded as Watermain Easement Doc. No. 595310.
The 'Rest Eight (8) feet of the East Six Hundred Forty (640) feet (except the
North Twenty-seven (27) feet thereof and the South Two Hundred Eighty-two and
Ninety-one Hundredths (282.91) feet thereof) of Tract "J", Registered Land
Survey Number Six Hundred Twenty-nine (629), Hennepin County, Minnesota,
recorded as Watermain Easement Doc. No. 595309.
2.
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for tvo weeks, in the Edina
Sun-Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
421.851.
This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EBsICMENTS FOR UTILITP PURPOSES
IN TEE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MNNeSOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
September 4, 1990 at 7:OO p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the
proposed vacation of the following easements for utility purposes:
The West Sixteen (16) feet of the East Six Hundred Forty-eight (648) feet
of the South Two Hundred Eighty-two and Ninety-one Hundredths (282.91)
feet and the East Eight (8) feet of the West One Thousand Two Hundred
Forty-six and Fifty-one Hundredths (1246.51) feet (except the North
Twenty-seven (27) feet thereof and the South Two Hundred Eighty-two and
Ninety-one Hundredths (282.91) feet thereof) all in Tract "J" Registered
Land Survey Number Six Hundred Twenty-nine (629), Hennepin County,
Minnesota, recorded as Watermain Easement Doc. No. 595310.
The West Eight (8) feet of the East Six Hundred Forty (640) feet (except the
North Twenty-seven (27) feet thereof and the South Two Hundred Eighty-two and
Ninety-one Hundredths (282.91) feet thereof) of Tract "J", Registered Land
Survey Number Six Hundred Twenty-nine (629), Hennepin County, Minnesota,
recorded as Watermain Easement Doc. No. 595309.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made
shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to
which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area
of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto,
for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED REQUESTING MTC TO CONTIN[Tp. BUS SERVICE ON ROUTES THRU EDINA
Planner Larsen said that staff has received a number of requests from individuals
in the Southdale area asking the City's help to prevent elimination of
Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) Routes 36, 78, 88 and 89 all of which serve
8/ 20 / 90 172
Edina. The reason for MTC's proposed discontinuance of these routes is financial.
MTC tries to hold all routes to a subsidy of $2.45 per passenger or less - all of
these routes have been averaging over $4.00 per passenger subsidy.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Wansit Commission (HTC) is considering discontinuing
routes 36, 78, 88 and 89 which serve the City of Edina; and
lJHm.EW, many people who live and work in Edina rely on the existing service
provided by these HTC routes; and
QEEREAS, a large population of senior citizens livlng in southeast Edina rely on
public transit for access to shopping and medical services, and
WHEREAS, there continues to be considerable new development in the 1-494 Coriridor
area which will add to the ridership on these routes; and
RHElUMS, routes 78, 88 and 89 provide alternatives to automobile trips on
Interstate 494 during peak hours; and
QEEREAS, discontinuation of the existing service would prove to be a great
hardship to transit riders who have no alternate means of transportation;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina requests that the Metropolitan
Transit Commission not discontinue service as proposed until such time as
reasonable alternative transportation is available along MTC routes 36, 78, 88
and 89.
ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1990.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
RESOLUTION
Rollcall :
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted .
I *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 08/20/90 and consisting of 38 pages: General Fund $302,093.45,
Communications $938.07, Art Center $16,132.32, Capital Fund $688.20, Svimming Pool
Fund $1,627.87, Golf Course Fund $35,220.21, Recreation Center Fund $4,082.72, Gun
Range Fund $953.83, Edinborough Park $14,143.35, Utility Fund $15,418.61, Storm
Sewer Utility $1,787.56, Liquor Dispensary Fund $113,013.02, Construction Fund
$310,317.86, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $705.15, Total $817,122.22, and for
confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check
Regiszer dated 07/31/90 and consisting of 18 pages: General Fund $841,892.43,
Communications $3,696.93, Art Center $2,445.32, SVimming Pool Fund $7,804.11, Golf
Course Fund $12,233.02, Recreation Center Fund $11,319.81, Gun Range Fund $308.31,
Edinborough Park $9,867.96, Utility Fund $31,726.71, Storm Sewer Utility
$1,005.07, Liquor Dispensary Fund $156,828.68, Total $1,079,128.35.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Pro-Tern Kelly
declared the meeting adjourned at 11:20 p.m.
City Clerk