HomeMy WebLinkAbout19920420_regular94
l!UNUTES
OF THE REGULBB MEETING OF THE
APRIL 20, 1992
EDIW CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITP HBLL
ROUCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
TROOP 254 WEBELOS WELCOMED
Troop 254 from Katherine Curran/John Ireland Schools in Hopkins, who were working
on citizen merit badges.
Mayor Richards welcomed members of Boy Scout Webelo
CONSENT AGENDA- ITEMS APPROVED
by Member Smith to approve and adopt the Council Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Motion was made. by Member Paulus and was seconded
-
Rollcall :
Ayes : Kelly, Paulus , Rice , Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MIMJ!lZS OF THE REGUIAR MEETING' OF APRIL 6. 1992 APPROVED Motion As made by
Member Paulus and vas seconded by Member smith to approve the Council Minutes of
the regular meeting of April 6, 1992.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HEIS ON DRAFT EDR?A CODE: DRAFT SECTIONS 410 AND 475
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Mayor Richards opened the third public hearing on the draft Edina City code by
stating that Council during the last six months has been reviewing the draft code
with the intention of holding a series of public hearings to allow input from
residents prior to the adoption of the code in June, 1992.
the code will be specifically focused upon at the hearings.
also be given to certain chapters after the sections are discussed.
I Certain sections of
Consideration will
DRAFT SECTION 410 - BUILDING CODE (RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL FIRE PREVENTION AND
FIRE SUPPRESSING SPRINKLING SYSTEMS)
Assistant Manager Hughes explained that draft Section 410 would adopt optional
chapters of the Minnesota State Building Code and the Uniform Building Code.
Chapter 55 which relates to membrane structures has been adopted. Staff would
recommend adoption of two additional optional chapters: Chapter 1335 relating to
floodproofing regulations, and Chapter 3808 relating to fire suppression systems
Fire Chief Paulfranz commented that information on optional Chapter 3808 was
mailed to persons that could be adversely impacted.
held with representatives from Minneapolis Building Owners and Managers
Association (BOMA).
suppression (sprinkler) systems and would apply to new buildings and buildings
where the occupancy classification has changed or the structure has been
increased in size or floor area. The effect would be to transfer some of the
increased costs for fire protection to those properties requiring increased
protection.
In addition, a meeting was
Chapter 3808 deals with installation of automatic fire
The Council questioned if Chapter 3808 would apply to a change of building
ownership, if there would be a cost benefit for building expansion, and if the
draft code as proposed would give the Council the authority to grant a variance
from the requirement to install sprinkler systems.
that a change of ownership of a building usually triggers a code compliance
inspection.
requirements are advisory and some are mandatory.
I Chief Paulfranz clarified
The existing building code is the standard used. Many of the
Any order issued under
4/29/92 95 i.'.
Chapter 3808 could be reviewed by the Building Construction Appeals Board.
board's decision would be acted upon by the State Building Code Division and
could also be appealed to the City Council.
to final adoption of the City Code, he needed to know who has the final decision
as to whether or not sprinkling systems are required to be installed if Chapter
3808 is adopted as it could be an unfair economic penalty in some cases.
The
Mayor Richards commented that, prior
Phil Engel, General Growth Management Company, testified that installation of
fire sprinklers in commercial or office buildings is absolutely necessary for
life safety. The sprinkler system cost today is the same as it was 20 years ago - $1.10 to $1.35 per square foot for new construction, $2.25 to $2.75 per square
foot for existing structures with an adequate water service.
from Buildings magazine "If you can afford to put carpet on the floor yoa-can
afford to put sprinklers in a new building."
standpoint you are looking at a two to five times penalty in insurance costs.
Sprinklers pay for themselves in a relative short period of time.
the more sprinklered buildings the City has the more efficient the fire
department can be in rendering service - it is a cost saving to the taxpayers.
Member Paulus asked if the proposed code goes far enough. Mr. Engel said the
draft code is standard in the industry and would give the City flexibility in
dealing with the area of life safety.
.Member Paulus asked Attorney Gilligan if the City would be liable for a fire
occurring in a building that was granted a variance by the Council from the
requirement to install a sprinkler system. Attorney Gilligan said he would
research the question and bring back an opinion.
Mr. Engel quoted
In most cases from a life safety
Additionally,
No further comment was heard.
SECTION 475 - PARKING RAMPS .
Assistant Manager Hughes observed that Section 475 - Parking Ramps is a new
section to the code'and would require the following: - Ramps and structured parking over five years old would require an annual
license. - Inspection and certification by qualified engineer would be required to
obtain a license.
In response to Member Rice, Assistant Manager Hughes said this would also apply
to City ramps.
1.
2.
3.
A qualified'engineer is defined as follows:
Registered by the state as a professional engineer in civil or
structural engineering.
Demonstrated experience and expertise in parking ramp inspection.
Maintains professional liability insurance with a company authorized
to do business in the state in the amount of not less than one
million dollars.
No public comment was heard on Section 475.
CHAPTER 9 - LIOUOR
Section 900 - Liauor and Wine
The following changes have been made to'the existing ordinance: - Elimination of the six month waiting period for a new business to obtain
a 3.2 beer license. - Elimination of provisions addressed by State Law. - Clarification of temporary beer license requirements:
1. Thirty days between licenses.
2.
3.
No more than four licenses per location annually.
Three day maximum per license.
Section 905 - ODen House Parties
The existing ordinance requirements apply only to adults who are present on the
premises during a party.
well.
Requirements have been expanded to include juveniles as
No public comment was heard on Chapter 9.
4120192 . ~. 96
CHAPTER 10 - MISDEMEANORS AND NUISANCES
Section 1000 - Crimes and Forbidden Conduct
The following changes have been made to the existing ordinance:
I - Antiquated provisions have been deleted. - New provisions:
(Covered by statute)
1. Terroristic threats. (Penalty for threats of harm.)
2. Fraudulent identification. (Returning merchandise for cash. )
Section 1015 - Hoax. Obscene or Annoving - Telephone Calls
The following provision has been added to the existing ordinance:
Section 1040 - Noises Disturbing the Public Peace
The following changes have been made to the existing ordinance:
hours changed to begin at 7:OO A.M.)
snowfall exceeding four inches in depth.
Section 1050 - Maintenance of Vegetation
The following substantial revisions have been made to the existing ordinance:
requirement is 12 inches.)
once during growing season.
Section 1055 - Control and Prevention of Shade Tree Diseases
The following provision has been added to the existing ordinance as directed by
Council :
- Includes 911 emergency calls.
- Adoption of PCA definition of daytime and nighttime hours.
- Exemption for snow removal from private property within 24 hours of a
(Daytime- .
-
- Weeds and grasses must not exceed 10 inches in height.
- Ornamental grasses and groundcovers must observe setbacks and be mowed
(Present
(Includes crown vetch and similar vegetation.)
- Cost of removal of diseased boulevard trees to be paid by homeowner.
Donna Nye, 5821 Zenith Avenue So., spoke to Section 1035 - General Nuisances.
She explained she had submitted a letter and photographs regarding overfeeding of
birds by a neighbor and the mess it creates.
Council to enact and enforce an ordinance in zoned residential areas which would
prohibit ground feeding of birds and wild animals and which would restrict the
size and number of bird feeders per square feet of property.
Council that Sanitarian Velde had visited the neighbor and told her to only fill
the bird feeders and to refrain from spreading food on the ground. The neighbor
has not complied. David Nye said an ordinance that would prohibit ground feeding
would substantially reduce the problem. It was noted that a court ruled against
a northern suburb in a case against a resident for overfeeding of geese on a lake
shore.
I Her letter had petitioned the
Ms. Nye told
Wallace Lilja, 6933 Moccasin Valley Road, said he was concerned about lack of
maintenance of residential properties in the City.
enforce compliance for reasonable maintenance of residential property from both a
health and aesthetics point of view.
Disneyland Edina but felt a spectrum of acceptability should be agreed upon.
Mayor Richards answered that the Council has discussed the need for an inspection
process when properties are sold, for example.
government should involve itself in that kind of activity, (condition of exterior
paint or other physical elements) but rather that the market place should make
those type of decisions.
with refuse and garbage.
properties up for sale but lack of maintenance on a continuing basis.
He asked if the City could
He said he is not trying to create a
There has been no consensus that
He added that the City does have ordinances that deal
Mr. Lilja interjected that the problem is not with
Member Smfth elaborated that when a lawn is not maintained or weeds are allowed
to grow, the City must mow and bill the owner or assess the property.
is used to maintain the City's standard.
trimming, roofs, siding, etc., it would mean additional expending of public funds
for aesthetics.
issue that was before Council recently.
Tax money
If expanded to include shrubbery
Member Rice commented that this is similar to the ground cover
In that case legal counsel had advised
4/29/92
97 ~ +. .
that it would be difficult to regulate such activity.
Member Paulus mentioned that many public dollars have been spent in trying to
defend and define the term "nuisance".
resident's right that they cannot be told to maintain their property to any
particular standard unless it becomes a health concern.
that could not be upheld in a court of law.
ordinance created by the City must be in line with federal laws and standards.
No further public comment was heard on Chapter 10.
The court system has defended a
Why create an ordinance
She reminded Council that every
CHAPTER 11 - PUBLIC UTILITIES
Section 1100 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Svstem
The following-provision has been added to the existing ordinance: - Hearing process prior to termination of water service.
Section 1105 - Connection Charaes
The following change has been made to the existing ordinance:
No public comment was heard on Chapter 11.
public hearing closed.
- Flat rate connection charges for sewer and water.
Mayor Richards then declared the
The Council briefly discussed the issue of excessive/ground feeding of birds and,
in specific, the problem on Zenith Avenue.
staff to contact the Zenith Avenue residents involved in an attempt to resolve
the problem through West Suburban Mediation Services.
Member Rice.
Member Kelly made a motion directing
Motion was seconded by
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY REZONING R-1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT TO R-2 DOUBLE DWEUING GRANTED FOR
LOT 3. BLOCK 1. MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 8TB ADDITION Affidavits of Notice were
presented, approved and ordered placed on file..
Presentation bv Planner
Planner Larsen explained that the subject property, Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley
Heights 8th Addition, is a vacant 20,000 square foot lot which is zoned R-1,
Single Dwelling Unit District.
rezoned to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District.
lot subdivision approved in 1977. Lots 1, 2, and 3 remain vacant. At the time
of subdivision, a house existed on Lot 5 and Lot 4 has since been developed as a
double bungalow. Lots 1, 2, and 4 are zoned R-2 and Lots 3 and 5 are zoned R-1.
The Comprehensive Plan designates this lot and adjacent lots fronting on McCauley
Trail as Low Density Attached Residential; R-2 zoning is consistent with that
designation.
and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet for an R-2 lot. The subject lot
conforms to these requirements.
The proponents have petitioned to have the lot
The subject lot is part of a five
The Zoning Ordinance would require a minimum lot width of 90 feet
Access to the subject lot was originally provided from McCauley Terrace because
of the steep grade along McCauley Trail.
strip is somewhat problematic.
development plan which would serve one unit from McCauley Trail and the other
from McCauley Terrace.
Staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as it is consistent with the
zoning status of adjacent properties and with the Comprehensive Plan.
problems can be handled, avoiding the shared driveway is desirable.
Commission considered the rezoning request on April 1, 1992, and recommended
approval.
McCauley Trail and the other unit be accessed from McCauley Terrace.
Serving two units from this narrow
The proponents have submitted a conceptual
If grade
The Planning
The Commission also recommended that one unit be accessed from
412019 2 98
Presentation for Proponent
Dennis McCauley, said he was speaking on behalf of his mother, Betty McCauley,
proponent who resides on Lot 5.
design for Lot 3 appeared to be more acceptable for a single dwelling home.
was left zoned as R-1 until such time as a potential purchaser desired to
construct a double bungalow.
Public Comment
Dennis Chase, 6455 McCauley Trail, said he resided on Lot 4. He stated he did
not object to the rezoning, but was concerned that the large boulder wall
retaining his property could be displaced by the construction of a double unit on
Lot 3. He said he was also concerned that his property may develop surface water
drainage problems.
Terrace because of the topography and the traffic on McCauley Trail.
conclusion Mr. Chase said he would like some assurance that any damages to his
property would be taken care of.
When the subdivision was originally platted the I It
He suggested that egress from both units be to McCauley-
- In
Council Comment/Action
Mayor Richards commented that the City does not function as a guarantor and could
not use public moneys for that purpose.
property was damaged as a result of the construction, Mr. Chase would have just
cause for a claim against the property owner or contractor.
Attorney Gilligan opined that if his
Member Rice said he has no problem with the land use but questioned what could be
physically built on the lot because of the topography. Planner Larsen pointed
out that when a building permit is applied for staff will review the plans for
code compliance.
Answering Member Kelly, Planner Larsen said that ingress/egress from the property
could not be a condition for the rezoning.
Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 825-846 for First Reading as follows:
THE
the
and
ORDINANCE NO. AM
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DUELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R-2)
CITY COlJNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDIJ!?A, l¶INIESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
following thereto:
Section 1.
"The extent of the Double Duelling Unit District (Sub-District R-2) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
See. 2.
publication.
Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition."
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted.
BOD OF APPI3AI.S DECISION REVERSED - VARIANCE GRANTED FOR SIDEYAFLD SETBACK
VARIANCES - LOT 30. BLOCK 10 COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION (4609 BRUCE AVENUE1
Presentation bv Planner
Assistant Planner Aaker advised that the subject property, located at 4609 Bruce
Avenue, is a two story colonial with an attached two car garage in the rear yard
area.
concrete drive, fence and oak tree in the rear yard. The house is situated on a
narrow 50 foot lot, and is non-conforming in terms of the north sideyard setback.
Currently the home is set back 4.75 feet along the north property boundary, The
ordinance requires a minimum 5 yard setback.
A graphic was presented illustrating the existing building footprint,
4/29/92. 99 . y.
The owners, Bruce and Laura Zimmerman, are proposing to convert the existing side
loading garage located in the rear yard into a family room, dinette, mudroom and
half-bath, to add a master suite with bathroom above the converted garge and to
construct a new attached two car garage to the south of the remodeled existing
garage.
would require a variance.
area above the new garage which has also been omitted.
Originally, the plans called for a deck which has now been omitted as it
In addition, the original plans proposed a storage
To accomplish the proposal as modified would require a 2.25 foot north sideyard
setback variance for the second story addition and a 2 foot south sideyard
setback variance for the attached garage.
bur oak tree in the rear yard area, the premise for the location of the new
attached two car garage.
would also provide open space in the rear yard area.
constructed in the rear yard area that would meet ordinance requirements.
Staff believes the proposed addition is a logical extension of the home based on
the following findings:
The proponents desire to preserve a
In addition to preserving a mature tree, the proposal
A detached garage could be
1) The north setback of the home is currently non-conforming.
2) The garage structure to be converted is an existing structure producing
less visual impact than the introduction of a completely new structure in the
rear yard.
3)
existing floor plan.
4)
preservation of an oak tree.
5)
order to be more conforming to ordinance requirements.
6)
boundary so only the southwest corner of the garage will be three feet from the
south lot line.
7)
8)
The second story master bedroom seems to be a logical extension of the
The proposed new attached garage arrangement would allow the
The attached garage has been reduced in size from original plans in
The new south facing garage wall angles away from the south property
Adjacent neighbors support the variance.
Similar variances have been approved in the past for properties along
Bruce, Casco and Arden Avenues in the Country Club District.
On April 2, 1992, the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments heard and denied the
request for variances based on lack of demonstrated hardship.
have appealed the Board's decision to the Council.
The proponents
Presentation bv ProDonent
Bruce Zimmerman, proponent, said that the plan as originally submitted to the
Board of Appeals is a well thought out and rational plan for the proposed
expansion to their home. The hardship is based in part in that the house was
initially built on a non-conforming basis.
the 150 year old bur oak'tree and to conform to.ordinance requirements for a two
car garage necessitates the south setback variance.
the house lines the architect has recommended that the north wall be kept flush
with the balance of the house. They also wish to extend the existing garage by
addition of a second story.
adjoining neighbors in terms of maintaining the back yard open space.
Further, that in order to preserve
To maintain the integrity of
He concluded that they have the support of the
Laura Zimmerman commented that the Board of Appeals was concerned about light
exposure for the neighbor to the north and the architect has advised that two
feet would not make a difference in the neighbor's vantage point.
Public Comment
Mike Casserly, 4611 Bruce Avenue South, commented that he disagreed with the
Board of Appeals' decision to deny the variances.
residents in the area living on 50 foot lots have a hardship when attempting to
He submitted that all
4/20/92 10 0
expand living space that is more appropriate to today's life style.
that they received a variance about 12 years ago to add an addition to their
home.
preferable to a detached garage in the rear and that it will be a nice
enhancement for the property.
He noted
He said the plan as proposed, which leaves the back yard space open, is
It was noted that letters in support of the proposal have been received from
Michael and Beverly Casserly, 4611 Bruce Avenue South, and Joyce L. Thomas, 4607
Bruce Avenue. Regarding the bur oak, Tom Horwath, Consultant City Forester,
opined "it is a tree of such grandeur that it benefits not only your lot, but
also aesthetically enhances the neighborhood immediately surrounding it."
Council CommentlActian -
Mayor Richards asked for a summary of the Board's decision to deny the variances.
Associate Planner Aaker said Board comments included the following:
should not be held hostage by a tree even though worth saving; 2) Potential for
modifications to the design; 3) A jog in the master bedroom in the rear yard
portion of the addition would enhance the aesthetics.
the Board regarding an appropriate design solution for the lot and they
encouraged the proponents to bring the matter to Council.
commented that he did not feel a hardship exists for granting the variances,
however slight they might be.
1) Board
There was no consensus by
Mayor Richards
Member Paulus commented that there are inconsistencies in the Board's report..
From a historical standpoint the Heritage Preservation Board has a concern
regarding front loading garages.
to minimize the impact.
attempted to define massing it was impossible.
destroy exigting green space and add mass.
with the Board's decision and would support the variances as requested.
Member Smith pointed out that the neighborhood is full of variances on sideyard
setbacks. He suggested staff leadership be provided for the Board when
considering variance requests in the Country Club area.
the proposal as a variance on the south side for the garage and a continuation of
an existing structure on the north.
A suggestion was made to incorporate a hip roof
The issue of massing was also raised. When the Council
A new detached garage would
She commented that she did not agree
Further, that he sees
Member Rice observed that he is still troubled by the massing issue but would
support the request for the slight variances.
Member Kelly commented that upon examination of the property she felt that the
proposed addition would be an improvement.
Mayor Richards said he was bothered by the term "slight variances". He recalled
that there was strong opposition by the neighbors to the addition to the home on
Drexel Avenue which required no variances whatsoever.
government should not legislate massing but that the ordinance requirements for
setbacks should be maintained as no hardship has been demonstrated.
He concurred that
Member Rice made a motion to grant the 2.25 foot sideyard setback variance and
the 2.0 foot south sideyard setbackvariance for 4609 Bruce Avenue, based on the
findings outlined by staff. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith
Nays : Richards (No hardship demonstrated. )
Variances granted. I
*BID AWARDED FOR MI;L POND WEED EARVESTING Motion was made by Xember Paulus and
was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Mill Pond weed harvesting to
recommended low bidder, Midwest Aqua Care, at $6,080.00.
4/23/92
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
101
*BIDS REJECTED FOR ASPHALT ROKLER: TO BE RE-BID Motion was made by Member Paulus
and was seconded by Member Smith to reject all bids for an asphalt roller and to
re-bid the equipment.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ?fINOTES OF APRIL 14. 1992 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman
briefly reviewed the discussion that occurred at the Traffic Safety Committee
meeting on April 14, 1992.
Member Smith made a motion to approve the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of
April 14, 1992, with no requests-for action in Section A and to aclmowledge-
Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY LEASE.REOUEST CONTINUED TO 5/4/92
explained that the request from Cemstone Products Company to lease City property
at 1-494/County Road 18 to set up a concrete plant operation had been continued
from April 6, 1992. Cemstone has been awarded the sub-contract for concrete to
construct the two mile stretch of the Bloomington ferry bridge over the next
three years. At Council's request, Cemstone has submitted additional information
as to operation, water and electricity, and environmental data, together with a
site plan and photo of a typical plant layout.
Engineer Hoffman
The site plan is laid out so that the pad location is tucked into an area
shielded by trees.
and has approved a grading permit.
felt it had merit because the City would be left with a usable area for concrete
or asphalt recycling of City materials or other possible recycling or composting
uses. One of the staff concerns has been the ever-increasing costs for disposal
of construction materials and the need to recycle.
concrete and bituminous to a recycling area out of the City is $10,000 per year.
Currently, the City is removing black dirt as needed from the west end of the
site and this results in approximately $5,000 savings per year without having to
purchase outside materials.
property is developed.
The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans
Staff reviewed the preliminary proposal and
Current costs for disposal of
The site would work until some other use of the
The Council Members raised the following questions: 1) Could the plant be seen
from the 16th tee of Braemar Golf Course; 2) Could a cancellation provision be
added to the lease agreement if dust or noise impacts the golf course; 2) Hours
of operation; 4) Has Cemstone been awarded the contract for the bridge; 5) What
does the City get upon completion of the bridge project; 6) Ingress/egress to the
site, 7) Responsibility for any environmental problems resulting from the plant
operation, and 8) Lease rent.
Engineer Hoffman answered that the Cemstone site would be approximately 900 feet
from the golf course. Bloomington residents may be impacted visually because of
their higher elevation.
minimal.
frontage road (MNDOT right of way) to a City cul-de-sac. Repair of the entrance
of the cul-de-sac would be the responsibility of the City after the three years.
When trees are leafed out the view of the plant would be
The entrance/exit to the site would be via the West 78th Stree,t
I road would be the responsibility of Cemstone during the leasing period. Repair
Tim Becken, Cemstone Products Company, informed Council that they have done
environmental studies on all Cemstone facilities.
residential areas within 600 feet of homes, and have not had a problem with dust
or noise.
They have placed plants in
They would be willing to include a cancellation provision in the lease
concrete plant is mostly from trucks running.
6:OO A.M. to 6:OO P.M. weekdays, reserving the right to work on an occasional
Saturday with a three week’s advance notice.
sub-contract for the bridge project.
$39,000.
by City vehicles, plus $2,000 in water revenues and $5,000 per year of rent.
Hours of operation would be
Cemstone has been awarded the
Set-up costs for Gemstone are estimated at
In summary, the City would receive a very usable site easily accessible
Considerable discussion followed regarding terms to be included in the lease
agreement, bonding and negotiation of the rental fee.
Member Kelly made a motion for conceptual approval for use of City land by
Cemstone Products Company for a portable concrete plant operation, subject-to-
- CouncZl approval of a lease agreement on May 4, 1992, terms and conditions
thereof to be negotiated by the Mayor, Manager, Engineer, City Attorney and
representatives of Cemstone Products. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Nays: Rice
Motion carried.
CODIFICATION WORK SESSION SET FOR 5/11/92
concurred that an additional codification work session would be necessary.
Member Padus made 8 motion setting my 11, 1992, at 7:OO P.M. for a codification
work session. Member Rice seconded the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
After brief discussion, the Council
CIAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to
approve payiient of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated April15, 1992, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $249,070.06; CDBG
$1,000.00; Cable $9,159.51; Working Capital Fuud $2,270.42; Art Center $1,613.64;
Capitol Fund $606.94; Pool $123.28; Golf Course $20,856.61; Arena $1,517.06; Gun
Range $48.20; Edinborough Park $25,913.44; Utilities $19,001.78; Stom Sever
$1,948.03; Liquor Dispensary $98,245.17; Construction Fund $17,293.10; IMP Bond
Redemption#2 $2,004.37; TOTBL $450,671.61; and for confirmation of payment of
the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 31,
1992, and consisting of 14 pages: General Fund $172,539.29; Communications
$18,338.21; Recreatton Center fund $775.00; Liquor Dispensary Fund $190,201.68;
Construction Fund $2,772.20; TOTAL $384,626.38.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
I
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared
the meeting adjourned at 9:45 P.M.
7&&%- a
City Clerk