HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-02-06 Reg Mtng MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 6,2012
7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
11. ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland.
111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED
Member Bennett made a motion,seconded by Member Swenson,approving the meeting agenda.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as
revised to remove Item IV-D., Prosecutor Contract 2012-2015; and, Item IV.E., Resolution No. 2012-23,
approving lot division of 5239 Highwood Drive,6008 and 6000 Pine Grove Road,as follows:
IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of January 17, 2012, and Work Session of
January 23,2012
IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January
19, 2012, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $191,069.41; Communications Fund
$18,226.00; Police Special Revenue$262.44;General Debt Service Fund$2,000.00;City Hall Debt
Service $2,100.00; Working Capital Fund $7,035.90; Equipment Replacement Fund $15,466.16;
Art Center Fund $2,063.89; Golf Dome Fund $16,950.07; Aquatic Center Fund $198.00; Golf
Course Fund $11,168.11; Ice Arena Fund $6,384.47; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund
$1,582.02; Edinborough Park Fund$2,751.29;Centennial Lakes Park Fund$1,973.64;Liquor Fund
$130,410.98; Utility Fund $64,532.84; Recycling Fund $38,820.60; PSTF Agency Fund $1,960.47;
Payroll Fund$1,702.35;TOTAL$516,658.64 and for approval of payment of claims dated January
26, 2012, and consisting of 25 pages; General Fund $430,281.38; Communications Fund
$7,965.69; Police Special Revenue $614.96;Working Capital Fund$14,632.61; Construction Fund
$341.00; Art Center Fund $2,170.19; Golf Dome Fund $2,667.19; Aquatic Center Fund $45.96;
Golf Course Fund $440.53; Ice Arena Fund $2,531.71; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund
$18,586.88; Edinborough Park Fund $11,774.30; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,272.24; Liquor
Fund $133,207.40; Utility Fund $30,839.80; Storm Sewer Fund $7,362.81; PSTF Agency Fund
$30,362.59; Payroll Fund $5,034.25; TOTAL$700,131.49; and,for approval of payment of claims
dated February 2, 2012, and consisting of 28 pages;General Fund$392,550.74; Communications
Fund $2,669.08; Police Special Revenue $23,007.49; PIR Debt Service Fund $3,000.00; Working
Capital Fund $68,202.72; Equipment Replacement Fund $9,981.15; Construction Fund $3,878.62;
Art Center Fund $4,392.29; Golf Dome Fund $32.36; Aquatic Center Fund $455,243.49; Golf
Course Fund $21,770.36; Ice Arena Fund $2,788.94; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund
$556.47; Edinborough Park Fund $6,640.43; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $771.37; Liquor Fund
$131,788.12; Utility Fund $1,786,383.49; Storm Sewer Fund $30,181.66; Recycling Fund $66.29;
PSTF Agency Fund$1,490.62;TOTAL$2,945,395.69.
IV.C. Waive Second Reading Adopting Ordinance No. 2012-03 Amending Section 905 Open House
Parties
144.0- 12.r0__SeGUtGr-Contract-!
14-9.& Re-Se-lution Ale. 2012 23, appFoying lot divisilen of 2229 Mighwe9d Wive, 6008 and 6000 Pine
G Feve-Read
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
IV.F. Request for Purchase, Job Evaluation/Classification Consultant Project, awarding the bid to the
recommended low bidder,TruSight, Inc. at$40,972.50.
IV.G. Request for Purchase, Millwork Supply, Edina Liquor York Remodel, awarding the bid to the
recommended low bidder,Aaron Carlson at$32,756.40.
IV.H. Request for Purchase, Resilient Flooring and Carpeting, Edina Liquor York Remodel, awarding the
bid to the recommended low bidder, MCI (Multiple Concepts Interiors)at$34,200.00
IV.I. Request for Purchase, Electrical Work, Edina Liquor York Remodel, awarding the bid to the
recommended low bidder,Burnsville Electric at$29,100.00
IV.J. Approve Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Beer License Our Lady of Grace Church for their Lenten Fish Fry
on March 23,2012
IV.K. Request for Purchase, Street Sweeper, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
MacQueen Equipment,Inc. at$181,333.00
IV.L. Request for Purchase, Survey Equipment, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Leica Geosystems at$25,398.50
IV.M. Adopt Resolution 2012-24 correcting Resolution No.2010-58—designating bicycle lanes on West
581h Street between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and designating a 25 mph speed limit
IV.N. Waive First Reading Ordinance No. 2012-04,amending the Edina City Code concerning the use of
tobacco in City parks
IV.O. Adopt Resolution 2012-25, changing public hearing date to March 6, 2012, Tracy Avenue
Roadway Reconstruction BA-368
IV.P. Approve Edina Emerald Energy Program(EEEP)
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
IV.D. PROSECUTOR CONTRACT 2012-2015 APPROVED AS AMENDED
Manager Neal stated he had every confidence in the decorum and skill of the prosecuting attorney, having
personally seen his work in court. Mr. Neal stated that Mr. Leach handled a tremendous workload with
skill and respect. The Council acknowledged the City's prosecuting attorney was the "face of Edina."
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving prosecutor contract 2012-
2015, amending Section 3c to reflect the postage was 50 cents per mailing piece and Section 4 to
indicate: "The Attorney will purchase and maintain sufficient insurance to protect Attorney against
claims for malpractice and provide evidence of the same to the City."
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IV.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-23 ADOPTED —APPROVING LOT DIVISION OF 5239 HIGHWOOD DRIVE,
6008 AND 6000 PINE GROVE ROAD
Planning Director Teague indicated the drainage and utility easements would remain in the property
owner's back yard. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012-23,
approving a lot division of 5239 Highwood Drive,6008 and 6000 Pine Grove Road,with correction to the
compliance chart relating to lot width, both existing and proposed of 5329 Highwood Drive, from 181
feet to 60 feet. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague,Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
None.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD—Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
VI.A. PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCES, REFINED LLC, 6109 OAKLAWN AVENUE—DENIAL FINDINGS
OF FACT ORDERED
Planning Director Presentation
Planning Director Teague presented the request of Refined LLC to subdivide the property at 6109 Oaklawn
Avenue into two lots; lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and, lot area variances from
9,000 square feet to 6,699 and 6,693 sq. ft. The existing single-family home would be torn down and two
new single-family homes would be built on the new lots. The result would be turning the lot into two 50-
foot lots as it was originally platted. In 1951 the ordinance was amended to require new lots to be 75 feet
in width and a minimum of 9,000 sq. ft. in lot size but this lot had been platted prior to that amendment.
In this area, the median lot width was 50 feet and the median lot size was 6,701 sq. ft. so the two
proposed lots would be just under the lot size median. The primary issue considered by staff and the
Planning Commission was if the variance findings were met in this instance. Mr.Teague presented each of
the required variance findings and the Planning Commission's determination on which its recommendation
for approval was based. A map was displayed depicting two locations where similar lot subdivisions had
already been approved. Mr. Teague advised the Planning Commission, at its January 11, 2012, meeting
recommended approval of the preliminary plat and variances on a 6 to 3 vote subject to the findings and
conditions as detailed in the staff report dated January 11, 2012.
Proponent Presentation
Andy Porter, Refined LLC, representing the property owner, stated the proponents were pleased to have
received staff support and the Planning Commission's logical conclusion to overwhelmingly support this
proposal. He clarified it was their preference and plan to market the opportunity to build a new home to
individuals and families; however, it was not yet known who that client would be or the type of home the
client would prefer. Mr. Porter indicated the proponent would abide by Edina's massing ordinances, one
of the most restrictive in the metro area. He addressed the issue of tree impact, noting the City currently
does not have a tree ordinance in place so any property owner had the right to trim, remove, or plant
trees on their property. Mr. Porter believed that creating two lots would match the flow of this
neighborhood's established lotscape that had been intentionally platted as two 50-foot lots.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m.
Public Testimony
Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council
James Durr, 6100 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council
Mark Petersen, Petersen, PLC, 228 East Chestnut Street, Suite 3, Stillwater, Minnesota, representing
Sawbill Strategic, Inc. (SSI), addressed the Council.
In response to the question of ownership raised by Mr. Petersen, Attorney Knetsch advised the City's
ordinance did not specify who had to sign the application so the fact that SSI had not joined the application
did not result in an incomplete application. Under Minnesota statute, ownership interest was not
extinguished because of a Sheriff's sale and the property owner of record retained the ability to redeem
the property for a period of six months. The City's determination was whether the variance standards
were met and the involvement of SSI and Mr. Bohlander(property owner of record) would not factor into
that determination. The City had 120 days to take action on the subdivision application, once deemed
complete.
The Council discussed the ownership situation and whether the application should be withdrawn until an
agreement was reached between the two parties. Mr. Porter stated he was part of the application and it
was his understanding that Mr. Bolander (property owner of record) had a redemption period so Mr.
Petersen's signature was not required to file for subdivision. Before the subdivision was filed the
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
proponent would close on the property, allowing Mr. Bolander to redeem with his lenders. The
redemption period does not expire until May.
Mr. Bolander, applicant and property owner of record, stated that was also his understanding of the
process and that he had the right to redeem the property. He believed Refined, LLC had properly handled
the application and would do what was right for the property and neighborhood. If the subdivision was
approved, the closing with Refined LLC, would occur prior to expiration of the redemption period and he
would be able to redeem the property.
Kathy McGuire,6104 Oaklawn, addressed the Council.
Mickie Turk,6141 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Dick Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue,addressed the Council
Bill Landgren, 6104 Brookview Avenue,addressed the Council.
Jackie Whitbeck,6128 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council.
Member Brindle made a motion,seconded by Member Swenson,to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague,Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
The Council and Mr.Teague addressed questions raised during public testimony. Mr.Teague indicated the
required side yard setback on a 50-foot wide lot was 5 feet compared with a required side yard setback of
10 feet on a 100-foot wide lot and an additional 6 inches of setback was added for every foot above 15
feet in building height. The maximum height was 35 feet (measured from existing grade), bay windows
were not exempt from required setbacks, the front yard setback was the average of homes on either side
(not average setback of the entire block), a detached garage could be constructed within three feet of the
property line, and the allowable lot coverage on a 50-foot lot was 2,250 sq. ft. (which could result in a
4,400 sq. ft. home). The Council discussed setbacks resulting from different building heights and required
first floor elevation.
It was noted the City of Minneapolis' zoning code measured floor area ratio limiting it to 50% of lot area,
which was more restrictive than Edina's ordinance. Mr. Teague stated Edina had considered a floor area
ratio but it was not approved. The Council noted there was about a two-foot elevation difference between
the two lots, if approved. Mr. Teague indicated the building height would be measured from the existing
grade and the first floor elevation could not exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home.
The Council discussed whether a condition could be placed that closing occur prior to expiration of the
redemption period. Mr. Knetsch indicated such a condition was not viable as it was not enforceable and
Mr. Bolander was correct that if the property was redeemed it would extinguish the interest of SSI and
eliminate the need for their consent to file the plat.
The Council acknowledged the Zoning Code did not allow the ability to require design review. It was
pointed out that this neighborhood was originally platted, including Pamela Park, into 50-foot lots but was
actually developed with varied lot widths, 50-foot, 60-foot, 70-foot, 100-foot, and even wider lots. The
Code was amended in 1951 to require a minimum lot width of 75 feet and area of 9,000 sq. ft. Staff was
asked whether there had been a downward departure defined or formula specified in the Code. Mr.
Teague indicated there was not except for lots in excess of 75 feet in width or 9,000 sq.ft. in area.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
Mr. Teague clarified that practical difficulties was not self created because the applicant had not created
the 100-foot lot. The practical difficulty was that everyone else on the block had a 50-foot wide lot and if
this application was not approved, this property owner would be denied a property use that all other
property owners on the block enjoyed.
With regard to drainage, Public Works Director/City Engineer Houle advised the grades would be reviewed.
In this neighborhood of smaller lots and difficult infiltration soils, the applicant would be required to direct
drainage from at least 50% of the area towards the street and connect downspouts and sump pumps to
the drain tiles at the curb.
Member Bennett indicated she does not find a practical difficulty with this application because the owner
had the same right to live on, develop, and redevelop the property as any other lot owner, regardless of lot
width, and economic considerations alone would not constitute practical difficulties. In addition,the Code
required a 75-foot lot width and does not contemplate, prescribe, or regulate a departure downward; the
City was required to find that a variance was consistent with Comprehensive Plan; the proposal would
result in impacts to neighboring privacy, and approval would break faith with existing neighborhood
residents who had purchased their property in reliance on the zoning code.
Mr. Teague noted this was a 100-foot lot of record as opposed to a 50-foot lot of record as every other lot
on the block. He indicated another consideration was the "reasonable use" standard and if the application
was denied, it would deny the use previously granted to a property owner a block away. With regard to
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Teague explained the application was not in harmony with
the Code, resulting in the request for the variances. In terms of the Comprehensive Plan it does not
prescribe zoning ordinance requirements. The site was guided for single-family homes, as being proposed
by the applicant.
Member Brindle indicated she would not support the application because she felt the existing 100-foot lot
created more benefit to the neighborhood than the creation of two 50-foot lots. She stated the existing
100-foot lot contained three landmark oak trees, provided an aesthetic,an area of relief in a neighborhood
of 50-foot lots, and swale to collect water. In addition, she would not want the City to become involved in
the legal battle between the two property owners during the redemption period.
Member Sprague stated his intention to support the application since this request was similar to
previously approved subdivisions and the same findings should result in the same conclusion. He believed
new development would not preclude quality of life and noted the house to be built was controlled by the
Zoning Code relating to setbacks and the market would dictate housing style.
With regard to the finding of practical difficulties, Mr. Knetsch supported Mr. Teague's comments and
indicated the property owner cannot enjoy a 50-foot wide lot like others on the block, which was a
distinction.
Member Swenson stated she would not support the application because while this street might have all
50-foot lots,the block does not and contained three very large lots.
Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012-27, approving a preliminary
plat with variances at 6109 Oaklawn Avenue based on the following findings as noted in the written
document. Mayor Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Sprague, Hovland
Nays: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson
Motion failed.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, directing staff and the City Attorney to
prepare written findings of fact for denial of the requested preliminary plat with variances at 6109
Oaklawn Avenue for consideration at the February 21,2012,Council meeting.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
W.B. SITE PLAN — PRIMROSE SCHOOL Of EDINA, MINNESOTA/CHILDEN'S DESIGN GROUP, 7401
METRO BOULEVARD—RESOLUTION NO.2012-28 ADOPTED
Planning Director Presentation
Planning Director Teague presented the request of Children's Design Group for a site plan review to
develop the recently created lot at 7401 Metro Boulevard with a Primrose Day Care Center. He indicated
the project meets all minimum zoning standards. This use would have 20 employees and 180 children, at a
maximum, so 480 parking stalls would be required. The site plan identified 485 stalls and proof of parking
to 506 stalls on the site. The parking study indicated 309 stalls would adequately serve these two uses and
the existing roadway system could support the project. The Planning Commission,at its January 11, 2012,
meeting recommended approval of the site plan subject to the findings and conditions as detailed in the
staff report dated January 11, 2012.
The Council discussed the shared parking arrangement between the proposed use and office use and
drainage of the parking lot. Mr. Houle stated the property was required to have an infiltration system that
retained the first inch of any storm event.
Proponent Presentation
Michael Brandt, 2676 Whitehurst Road, Deland, Florida, representing the applicant, stated this was a new
facility with an existing franchisee for a second school. He clarified there would be 22 employees and
children as young as six weeks. He indicated the proposal met State mandates relating to number of
employees and square footage and peak timing for drop-off and pick-up of students.
The Council discussed the application including setbacks, building height and coverage, drive aisles, and
parking.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:55 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared to comment.
Member Sprague made a motion,seconded by Member Bennett,to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012-28, approving a site plan for
7401 Metro Boulevard, based on the following findings:
1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan.
2. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact and parking study, and concluded that the existing
roadway system could support the proposed project, and there would be more than enough
parking.
And subject to the following conditions:
1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the following plans,unless modified by the conditions below:
• Site plan date stamped November 28,2011
• Grading plan date stamped November 28,2011
• landscaping plans date stamped November 28,2011 and January 5, 2012
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
• Building elevations date stamped November 28, 2011 and January 6, 2012
• Building materials board including colors as presented at the Planning Commission and City
Council meeting.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff
approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for
one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscape, screening, or
erosion control measures.
3. Before issuance of a building permit, a shared parking arrangement with the southern lot must be
executed.
4. The property owner was responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies.
5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to
the approved plans to meet the District's requirements.
6. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new building.
7. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated January 5,2012.
Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT
No one appeared to comment.
VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO.2012-22 ADOPTED—ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS
Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be
adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.
Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012-22 accepting various
donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.B. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO VARIOUS BOARDS, COMMISSIONS,AND COMMITTEES
Member Swenson thanked Clerk Mangen for her support during the interview process and presented the
recommended slate of appointments and reappointments. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded
by Member Bennett, approving the following new appointing with a term ending February 1, 2015
unless noted differently: Art Center Board: Marsha Buchok and Ray Meifert; Board of Appeal &
Equalization: Steven Suckow; Community Health Committee: Nancy Ott-Pinckaers, M.D.; Construction
Board of Appeals: Scott Busyn; Energy & Environment Commission: John Heer and Tim Rudnicki;
Heritage Preservation Board: Jennifer Christiaansen, Joyce Mellom, and Peter Sussman; Human Rights
and Relations Commission: Ron Erhardt; Park Board: Daniel Geiseke and Kathryn Peterson and School
Board Representative Cathy Cella with a term ending February 1, 2013;and,Transportation Commission:
Surya lyer,Tom LaForce,and Courtney Whited.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the following
reappointments: Art Center Board: Colin Nelson with a term ending February 1, 2014; Community
Health Committee: Adnan Qureshi, M.D. with a term ending February 1, 2014; Human Rights &
Relations Commission: John Cashmore with a term ending February 1, 2013; Park Board: David Deeds
with a term ending February 1, 2014; and Planning Commission: Michael Schroeder with a term ending
February 1,2015.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2012
Motion carried.
VIII.C. ENERGY IMPROVEMENT—GRANDVIEW TIRE AND AUTO, 5415 WEST 70'STREET—RESOLUTION
NO. 2012-26 ADOPTED
Utility Engineer Struve presented the request of Grandview Tire and Auto, 5415 70th Street, requesting
$31,686 from the Edina Emerald Energy Program (EEEP) to be a special assessment against the property.
This was a portion of the $131,375 construction costs to install solar panels on top of its facility, which
would reduce energy consumption. It was noted that per City policy, capitalized interest would be added
to the amount requested to bring the total assessment levied against the property to $34,030. Staff
recommended approval.
The Council discussed and agreed to waive the 2% overhead proposed to be charged above the loan
interest rate of 7% since the City had received a $10,000 grant to defray the City's costs to start this pilot
program. Mr. Struve stated the attorney had agreed to cap legal costs for drafting the forms and
agreements at $10,000 (the grant amount). The Council discussed the benefit of securing lower cost
financing to assure the project/program was successful since it served the public purpose of energy
savings. Mr. Neal indicated this had been a pilot project, treated as such, and administrative costs to
administer the debt would be nominal.
Rick Murphy, Grandview Tire and Auto, stated if the 2% overhead was waived, he would make application
to the PACE for a loan of $31,686. He stated 7% interest was higher than market rate but it was an
investment on their behalf to make the program work.
It was noted that even if the City did not charge 2% overhead above the bond rate, the full cost of the
bonds would be repaid by the assessment to the applicant. The Council acknowledged a similar conduit
financing had been used with Fairview Southdale Hospital and the Volunteers of America and the public
purpose was environmental benefit. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution
No. 2012-26, approving agreement and adopting assessment, waiving the 2% overhead charge since the
City received a grant to defray legal costs. Member Brindle seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of
various correspondence.
X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS—Received
Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS—Received
X11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at
10:20 p.m. 1
Respectfully submitted, 1
Debra a en, City lefierk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 21, 2012.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the February 6, 2012, meeting available.
Page 8