HomeMy WebLinkAbout19950501_regular277
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 1,1995
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Maetzold,
Paulus, Smith and Richards.
of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Paulus and carried
unanimously for adoption of a Proclamation naming May 6, 1995,
as League of Women Voters of Edina Day. The Proclamation noted
that in 1954, the League of Women Voters of Edina was organized
to educate voters and address significant city issues through
the preparation and distribution of non-partisan and unbiased
materials, promote community recycling efforts, establish the
Edina Community Center, and monitoring and support of gender equality in Edina schools. accepted the Proclamation on behalf of the Edina League of
Women Voters.
40TH ANNIVERSARY PROCLAIMED FOR LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Motion
Connie Hondl and Carol Frisch
J4ARCELLA M. DAEHN DAY PROCLAIMED IN EDINA Motion of Member
Smith was seconded by Member Kelly and carried unanimously
proclaiming April 28, 1995, as Marcella Daehn Day in Edina. As
noted on the Proclamation, Marcella Daehn began her career with
the City of Edina on January 17, 1977, and was promoted to the
position of City Clerk, June 1, 1983, from which position she
is now retiring. She has exemplified the highest standards of
public service and is retiring after 18 years of tireless,
faithful and indefatigable service.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED
and was seconded by Member Maetzold to approve and adopt the
Council Consent Agenda items as presented with the exception of
removal of Item V.A. - Sanitary Sewer and Watermain - The
Coventry at Centennial Lakes 2nd Addition.
Motion was made by Member Smith
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF JOINT HRA/COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1995, REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1995, AND SPECIAL COUNCIL M EETING OF
APRIL 3, 1 995, APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was
seconded by Member Maetzold to approve the Minutes of the Joint
HRA/Council Regular Meeting of April 17, 1995, Regular Meeting of
April 17, 1995, and Special Council Meeting of April 3, 1995.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED ON LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, CARLSONIS
PARK (4904 AND 4912 MERILANE)
was seconded by Member Maetzold for adoption of the following
resolution.
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute
separate parcels:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, CARLSONIS PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Motion was made by Member Smith and
RESOLUTION
278 5/1/95
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to
subdivide said tracts into the following described new and
separate parcels:
PARCEL A:
That part of Lot 2, Block 1, CARLSON'S PARK, Hennepin County,
Minnesota lying northerly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2
distant 60.45 feet south from the most westerly corner
of said Lot 2; thence easterly 263.02 feet to a point on
the easterly line of said Lot 2, distant 101.70 feet
south, along a curve concave to the west having a
central angle of 8 degrees 53 minutes 45 seconds and a
radius of 655.00 feet, from the most northerly corner of
said Lot 2.
PARCEL B:
That part of Lot 2, Block 1, CARLSONIS PARK, Hennepin County,
Minnesota lying southerly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 2
distant 60.45 feet south from the most westerly corner
of said Lot 2; thence easterly 263.02 feet to a point on
the easterly line of said Lot 2, distant 101.70 feet
south, along a curve concave to the west having a
central angle of 8 degrees 53 minutes 45 seconds and a
radius of 655.00 feet, from the most northerly corner of
said Lot 2.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will
create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts
of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections
810 and 850.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the
City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as
separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements
and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby
waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate
tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to
any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels
unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the
City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be
provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this first day of May, 1995.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*RESOLUTION AMENDING MARCH 20, 1995 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -
COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 2ND ADDITION Member Smith introduced
the following resolution and moved its approval:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled 'ITHE COVENTRY AT
CENTENNIAL LAKES 2ND ADDITIONI', platted by Centennial Land Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, an undivided 91.43%
interest, and John W. Hedberg, an undivided 8.57% interest, and
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a
public body corporate and politic under the laws of the Sate of
Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of the City
Council of March 20, 1995, be and is hereby granted final plat
I
5/1/95
approval.
Motion was seconded by Member Maetzold.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
279
pp L LEN
CIRCLE CONTINUED TO MAY 15, 1995 Member Smith stated he would not
participate in the discussion or vote on the proposed vacation of
a portion of Glenbrae Circle due to a possible conflict of interest ,
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed
on file.
Presentat ion by Enaineer
Engineer Hoffman explained that a property owner at 5300 Glenbrae
Circle had petitioned the City to vacate a portion of Glenbrae
Circle, or re-build it. After an analysis, the Public Works
Department concluded that vacating a portion would be the most
effective and would require no assessment to any property owner. The adjacent land on the east and south sides of the vacated
portion is currently City open space.
apprised of this proposal and do not object to the vacation.
Staff would recommend the vacation if the Council approves.
Utility companies have been
Planner Larsen submitted written comments on the proposed vacation
that:
1.
2.
Lots at 5300 and 5404 would continue to comply with Zoning
Ordinance standards that require at least 30 feet of frontage
on public streets.
The proposed vacation would severely limit future subdivision
of the properties.
conceivable that the properties could cooperate in a
subdivision. If the street were vacated, necessary frontage
would be lacking to support an additional lot.
The lots are large and it would be
Member Maetzold inquired if the vacation were approved would the
roadbed would be left to deteriorate. Engineer Hoffman said all
that is left of the asphalt is a very thin layer and some of it
would be hauled away.
replanted with grass seed and bollards placed on both ends,
Extra fill could be dumped on the area and
Resident comments
Lori Quist, 5301 Glenbrae Circle, said she has lived in that
location for 46 years and voiced concern with access for 5300 and
5304 Glenbrae Circle.
egress is available for both lots which would not be affected by
the vacation.
vacated portion and the vacated portion could be allowed to return
to a natural setting.
Julie Harper, 5300 Glenbrae Circle, explained she initiated the
petition.
it would not be improved. Her house has been on the market and
did not sell because the street resembles a !!war zone1!. If the
vacation is approved, her hope is that the look of the area will
improve, possibly with a walking trail incorporated into the area.
She does not want the expense of the road repair to be her
responsibility.
Engineer Hoffman explained that adequate
Glenbrae Circle would be maintained up to the
She does not want to lose her street but realized also
288 5/1/95
Wayne Briggs, 5325 Ayrshire, said he had just moved to the area
would prefer the area be returned to its natural state.
I Council Comments/Action
Mayor Richards asked if the resident at 5304 had commented on the
proposed vacation. Engineer Hoffman said no comments or concerns have been received.
Member Maetzold said he would concur with removal of the road and
reverting it back to a natural area.
introduction of a public access, walking path which would be owned
and maintained by the City.
He would agree to the
Mayor Richards agreed with the proposed vacation and plan, but he
would feel more comfortable if additional contact were made and
views received from the resident at 5304 Glenbrae Circle, and that
it be back on the agenda May 15, 1995.
Motion was made by Member Maetzold to continue the proposal for a
vacation of a portion of Glenbrae Circle to the regular Council
meeting of Nay 15, 1995, allowing further contact with the
resident at 5304 Glenbrae Circle. Motion was seconded by Member
Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Richards
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 1995-2 AD OPTED - AMENDING CO DE SECTION 300 TQ
REGULATE PLACE MENT OF EL ECTRONIC PET CO NTAINMENT SYSTEMS
Assistant Manager Hughes reminded Council that on April 17, 1995,
the Council granted First Reading of the subject Ordinance.
Ordinance regulates placement of invisible fencing systems.
proposed Ordinance prohibited the placement of such systems within
20 feet of the travelled portion of a public street.
I The
The
At the April 17, 1995, meeting, the Council directed staff to
consider revisions to the Ordinance to include setback
requirements from sidewalks. Assistant Manager Hughes said based
on this direction, the Ordinance has been amended to provide a 10
foot setback requirement for the travel portion of the street or a
10 foot setback from the public sidewalk if a sidewalk is present
along the street.
Assistant Manager Hughes noted that staff has also had the
opportunity to discuss the proposed Ordinance with representatives
of Invisible Fence Corporation.
that electronic pet containment systems are designed such that the
animal under control typically is prevented from moving within 10
feet of the buried conductor. Based upon this information, the
Ordinance was further revised to prohibit systems which allow an
animal to occupy an area within 10 feet of the sidewalk or within
10 feet of the street. The actual location of the conductors,
therefore, may be closer to the sidewalk or the street than 10
feet .
These representatives advised
Member Paulus inquired whose expense it would be to remove an
electronic fence if it were placed in the right-of-way.
Hoffman said that in the past the City has repaired any damage
that has been done.
should be installed off the right-of-way.
Engineer
He would suggest any fence being installed
5/1/95 281
Scott Gensmer, Invisible Fence Corporation, said he was available
to answer questions or concerns. Invisible Fence Corporation has
installed approximately 250 systems for Edina residents.
Mayor Richards asked if any of the 250 were installed within the
right-of-way. Mr. Gensmer said he believed a large portion of
them were, because the desire of the consumer is to give their pet
as much freedom to roam their property as possible.
portion is installed along the property boundary much like a
chain-link fence, however, the ideal for effective containment
would be an eight foot signal field on each side of the wire.
signal field can be set up to 40 feet or as narrow as three feet.
The process to realign the wire on a per yard basis would cost
approximately $47.00 for a service call or the resident could do
it themselves. Mr. Gensmer offered to inform existing customers
of the ordinance and a copy of the ordinance could be included
with the self-install kits.
The hardware
The
Member Smith inquired what frequency the system operates on.
Gensmer said his systems operate on either a 7k or a 10k frequency. Anything above 8 megahertz is regulated by the FCC.
Member Smith asked what would happen to a dog that was walked on a
leash close to another electronic system. Mr. Gensmer indicated
that most dogs that are electronically controlled do not want to
leave the yard because of the electric shock.
encouraged by the owner to leave, usually the electronic collar is
removed and replaced with a regular collar.
Mr.
If they are
Member Paulus asked if this system is 100% effective. Mr. Gensmer
said he has been in the business since 1983 and the company has a
98% containment rate.
because of a wire break caused by landscaping, an underground
activity or a low battery.
If a dog leaves the yard, it is generally
Council Comment/Actioq
Member Paulus stated she agrees with the City Engineer that
nothing should be buried in the right-of-way.
installation flags placed at the curbline frequently and that
concerns her.
She has observed
Member Smith concurred with Member Paulus that nothing should be
placed in the right-of-way.
Mr. Gensmer said flags are always set directly on top of the wire,
yet dogs cannot get within eight to ten feet of the flags or wire
during the initial training session. The flags are used to train
the dog visually of the barricaded area. The wire is actually the
irrelevant part of the system and he asked that use of the right-
of-way for pet containment not be restricted.
Member Maetzold stated he likes the ordinance as written with the
10 foot setback from the public sidewalk or travelled portion.
Further, it doesn't bother him that the wire is installed in the
right-of-way because it is a minor electrical device and would be
inexpensive to move if necessary.
Member Smith asked if the City should be responsible for
relocation of the wires much like irrigation systems. Member
Maetzold responded that the City should not be responsible for any
5/1/95
relocating of the pet containment system.
in the ordinance be added that the cost of relocation would be the
responsibility of the homeowner.
Member Paulus indicated that an opinion should be sought from the
City Attorney whether language could be added stating whose
responsibility the relocation would be. Attorney Gilligan said language could apply to future installation but he would need to
research how previously installed systems could be brought into
compliance.
He suggested language
282
I
Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No.
1995-2 as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Member Smith offered an amendment to the motion to include
language that would not allow a pet containment system to be
installed within the public right-of-way. Motion failed for lack
of second.
Member Paulus moved Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1995-2, as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. '1995-2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 300 OF
THE CITY CODE TO REGULATE THE PLACEMENT
OF ELECTRONIC PET CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
Subsection 300.01 of Section 300 of the City Code
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
is amended by amending the following definition:
Section 1.
IlAnimal Enclosure.
structure or area including pens, dog houses, kennels, and
outside runs that are principally used or designed for use as
a place for the keeping of animals.
Section, an electronic pet containment system shall not be
deemed to be an animal enclosure.11
Section 2.
W3lectronic Pet Containment System. A system created by the
installation of conductors on the ground or under the ground
which emit or cause to be emitted an electronic signal for
the purpose of confining animals within a predetermined
area . 11
Section 3. Subsection 300.17 of Section 300 of the City Code
IWubd. 4. Electronic Pet Containment Systems. No electronic
pet containment systenk shall be installed which allows any
animal confined by the system to occupy any area within ten
feet of a public sidewalk or within 10 feet of the travelled
portion of a public street if there is no public sidewalk.
Electronic Pet Containment systems installed within any
public right-of-way or public easement shall be owned and
maintained by the owner of the system.
direct the removal or relocation of an Electronic Pet
Containment System from any public right-of-way or public
easement at the sole cost and expense of the owner of the
Electronic Pet Containment System if the Engineer determines
the system interferes with the publicls use of the right-of-
way or easement. The cost of any repair to Electronic Pet
Containment systems which are damaged due to the publicls use
of a public right-of-way or public easement shall be borne
I Any building or portion thereof,
For purposes of this
Subsection 300.01 of Section 300 of the City Code
is amended by adding the following definition:
is amended by adding a new Subd. 4 as follows:
The Engineer may
5/1/95 283
solely by the owner of the system.'
Section 4. Subsection 300.17 of Section 300 of the City Code
is amended by renumbering Subd. 4 and Subd. 5 as Subd. 5 and Subd.
6 respectively.
upon passage.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Mayor
was seconded by Member Maetzold.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
Member Paulus suggested that names of other pet containment system
installers be acquired and notified of the impending regulations.
BID AWARDED FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN - THE COVENTRY AT
CENTENNIAL LAKES 2ND ADDITION Member Maetzold said he asked that
this item be removed from the Consent Agenda and questioned the
note on the bottom of the Purchase Request which stated rprices
for this project came in higher than anticipated and staff would
recommend discussion with the developer prior to Council approval.
Engineer Hoffman explained that the developer was out of town when
bids were opened and because the bid came in higher than was
estimated, they wanted to give the developer time to review and
accept it. After the developer reviewed the bids, he concurred to
award the bid.
Member Maetzold made a motion for award of bid for sanitary sewer
and watermain at the Coventry at Centennial Lakes 2nd Addition to
recommended low bidder, G. L. Contracting, Inc., at $42,407.40.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards '
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR CONCRETE
seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for concrete to
recommended low bidder, Model Stone, Co., at $54.80 per yard.
Motion was made by Member Smith and was
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TWO DUMP TRUCK CHASSIS Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for two
dump truck chassis to Boyer Ford Trucks at $88,890.00 through
State Contract #C-79094-0276-01.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TENNIS COURTS RESURFACE/REPAIR Motion was made
by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Maetzold for award of
bid for tennis courts resurfacing and repair to recommended low
bidder Mikkelson Construction Co. Inc:, at $8,950.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
I.
284 5/1/95
*BID AWARDED FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM - NORMANDALE PARK Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Maetzold for award
of bid for irrigation system at Normandale Park to recommended low
bidder, Green Acres Sprinkler Company at $6,480.00. I Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FIBERGLASS TRUCK BODY FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded
Maetzold for award of bid for fiberglass service
maintenance truck to recommended low bidder, ABM
Supply, Inc., at $7,711.67.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
by Member
body for park
Equipment and
*BID AW2lRDED FOR 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS DISPLAY - PARK AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for Park and
Recreation 4th of July Fireworks Display to sole supplier, Remote
Effects Systems, Inc., at $7,100.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR POLICE PROFESSIONAL TZABILITY INSURANCE Motion
was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member.Maetzold for
award of bid for Police Professional Liability Insurance to
recommended low bidder, St. Paul Fire &
Marine at $29,145.00.
*BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY INSURANCE Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Maetzold for award
of bid for Public Officials Liability Insurance to recommended low
bidder, National Union Fire at $16,674.00.
Motion was made by Member Smith and was
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ELECTRIC CRANQ
and was seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid for an
electric crane to recommended low bidder, Twin City Truck
Equipment at $6,478.00.
Motion was made by Member Smith
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FIBERGLASS SERVICE BODY Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Maetzold for award of bid
for a fiberglass service body to recommended low bidder, ABM
Equipment & Supply at $10,287.90. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
DONATION/SPONSORSHIP POLICY PRESENTED - CONTINUED TO JUNE 5. 1995
At the April 3, 1995, Council meeting, staff was directed to
revise and incorporate input that was received into the original
donation/sponsorship policy that was presented.
Member Maetzold said he was remiss in not submitting written input
regarding the policy for donations/sponsorship. The approach he
wished to depict would be affirmative and proactive towards
donations and sponsorships. As appropriate, sponsorships should
be pursued for fund-raising.
donation/sponsorship policy to affect a pro-active approach to
fundraising if the Council concurs.
I He offered to work with staff on the
Member Smith commented that he would not agree to a
5/1/95
donation/sponsorship policy being adopted.
285
Member Kelly questioned how 1) sponsorship conditions could be
measured to be commensurate with value and 2) if the fireworks
display is 100% funded by outside sources, whose responsibility
the liability would be.
listed in each issue.
to give his time and work with staff on the policy, his expertise
should be utilized.
The School Board newsletter has donations
She concluded if Member Maetzold is willing
Member Paulus asked if philosophically this policy could be an
added benefit and possibly replace budgeted items. The fireworks
display last year was fantastic and will be again this year even
without the $3,000 from Norwest Bank. She questioned whether the
corporate world try to use public means to advertise.
Member Maetzold reiterated that his ideas would be pro-active as
appropriate in nature.
troubles him that, was a rule, staff will not seek private funding
for existing programs unless directed by the Council'.
Mayor Richards said until input is received from everybody and a
policy is established, he suggested continuing the issue until the
June 5, 1995, regular Council Meeting. Council members concurred
with this continuance.
One statement in the original policy
*1995 CONTRACT WITH LOCAL 49 - INTERNATIONAL OPERATING ENGINEERS
APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Maetzold approving the 1995 Contract between the City and
Local 49 of the International Union of Operating Engineers as
presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
DISCUSSION HELD ON JOHN SENIOR, JR. HEARING, CONTINUED TO MAY 15,
1995. COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Richards said that a Closed Special
Meeting of the Council had been called on April 27, 1995, at 5:OO
P.M. pursuant to Section 150.20 of the Edina City Code, having to
do with Volunteer Firefighter, John Senior, Jr.
After a brief Council discussion, the decision was made to make
testimony transcriptions and exhibits available for the Council to
read and examine prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting
of May 15, 1995.
HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY PERSONNEL ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL Milton
Goldstein, Immediate Past President of the Hennepin County Library
Board, explained that the library board had traveled to 42
different cities within the library system and shared pertinent
information concerning the County library system.
He introduced Charles M. Brown, Library Director, who told that
the Hennepin County Public Library is a well known and respected
institution throughout the United States.
Public Library, the Hennepin County Public Library is one of the
two largest library systems between Chicago and the west coast.
The system has 25 locations now, soon to be 26, with two mobile vans that serve many communities. A staff of 750 (450 full-time
equivalent) serves the.public with a operating budget of $24
million dollars. Renovation of facilities is a continuous task.
Along with the Houston
286 5/1/95
Keeping up with technology both with the printed word and the
Internet is a financial challenge.
individual access to library services by way of modem, self-check
out machines and automated telephone reserve notification. Forty-
five percent of library usage is by children 12 and under and will
continue to be a main priority.
Julia Morgan, Manager of the Southdale Library, the busiest in the
State of Minnesota, said after 2 1/2 years, the fences are down
and the construction is complete. The facility was constructed in
1973, and has undergone many small renovations. The latest
renovation created 15,000 additional square feet and completed
renovation of both interior and exterior of the building. Ninety-
nine people are employed at the library, sixty-five on a full time
basis. She told that librarians handle over 100 questions per
hour all year long.
community meeting rooms, quiet area, media lab, CD-ROM
workstations and an extensive reference library. Children's
services include storytime, school visits, collection work and
even help with homework. Summer programs for children are well
received also. Adult programs include dark room techniques for
photographers, book talks, how to use the library for investment
services and how to use the card catalog.
Future plans include
Additional services at the library are
Mary Wilson-Swatosh, Manager of the Edina Community Library and
the Head Librarian for a cluster of libraries which include the
Eden Prairie and Minnetonka Libraries shared background on how the
League of Women Voters served as a catalyst to study the library
situation in Edina and recommendation that the Community Library
not be absorbed by the Southdale Library System.
Library has approximately 15,000 square feet and houses 40,000
books, books on tape and compact discs. An active "Friends of the
Library" group exists which offers in-kind and monetary support as
well as sponsoring authors programs. "Friends of the Library"
recently took part in the successful Human Relations Commission
event "Everyday Heroes".
The Community
Mayor Richards thanked the representatives of the Hennepin County
Library System for their excellent presentation.
RESIGNATION OF EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
ANNOUNCED
Executive Director of the Edina Chamber of Commerce has resigned
effective the end of May, and has accepted a position with the
Burnsville Chamber.
Manager Rosland informed Council that Keith Hilgendorf,
CLAIM FROM CHECK REGISTER DATED APRIL 13, 1995 PAID Manager
Rosland explained that at the April 17, 1995, meeting Check No.
154722 to National Business Financial in the amount of $25,946.38,
was removed from payment for additional detail. After a brief
explanation, Member Smith made a motion to approve payment for
Check No. 154722 to National Business Financial at $25,936.38.
Member Paulus seconded the motion. I Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID
following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated
Member Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the
5/1/95
April 27, 1995, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund
$184,062.26; C.D.B.G. $1,000.00; Communication $152.95; Working
Capital $16,832.16; Art Center $9,994.41; Swimming Pool $585.00;
Golf Course $70,632.06; Ice Arena $5,251.62; Gun Range $58.15:
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $20,072.00; Utility Fund $310,502.09;
Storm Sewer $330.76; Recycling $21.60; Liquor Fund $59,776.47;
Construction Fund $4,343.23; IBR #2 Fund $18,529.213 TOTAL
$702,143.97. Motion was seconded by Member Maetzold.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the C
Richards declared the meeting adjourned
287