HomeMy WebLinkAbout19950905_regularMINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 5,1995
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Maetzold, Paulus, Smith and Mayor Richards.
Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:03 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Maetzold and
was seconded by Member Smith to adopt the Council Consent Agenda as presented
with the exception of item 1V.B. new 3.2 beer license for Davanni’s Pizza and Hot
Hoaggies.
Rollcall: ,
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CONSTITUTION WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Maetzold was seconded by
Member Kelly and carried unanimously proclaiming September 17 through 23 as
Constitution Week in Edina. The proclamation stated it is a privilege and duty of all
Americans to commemorate the two hundred sixth anniversary of the drafting of the
Constitution of the United Sates with appropriate ceremonies and activities during the week
of September 17 through the 23.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, q995 Motion was made by
Member Maetzold and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of August 21,1995.
I
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON OVERALL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PARCELS E AND F,
CENTENNIAL LAKES (UNITED PROPERTIES) Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation bv Planner
Planner Larsen informed the Council the subject property is located east of France Avenue
and south of West 76th Street. The area measures approximately 25 acres and represents
the remaining undeveloped land within the Centennial Lakes project. The originally
approved Overall Development Plan for the site calls for 403 dwelling units in mid to high
rise housing plus 1,150,000 square feet of office development. The developer, United
Properties, is requesting an amendment to the 1988 Overall Development Plan which would
eliminate all of the housing and would increase the office space to 1,160,000 square feet.
In 1990, the Council considered a similar amendment to the Overall Development Plan. At
that time, the plan amendment illustrated five office buildings totaling 1 , 100,000 square feet
with all residential development eliminated. No action was taken on the revised plan. I
Page 1
MinutedEdina City Council/September 5,1995
RETAIL: 201,600 s.f.
THEATRE: 39,050 s.f.
HOTEL: 250 ROOMS
RESTAURANT: - 0 -
HOUSING: 1,085 D.U.
Planner Larsen stated that the current proposed Overall Development Plan amendment
shows a restaurant located between buildings one and two. A restaurant is a permitted use
under the current MDD-6 Zoning. The proposed plan amendment retains public functions
and facilities of previous plans including the ponding area, pedestrian paths and the
tramway. However, the amendment is different in that the pedestrian and tramway functions
are separate, not combined as in the balance of the project. The tram would circulate on the
outside of the proposed buildings while pedestrians would have exclusive use of a path
adjacent to the pond.
RETAIL: 201,600 s.f.
THEATRE: 39,050 s.f.
HOTEL: -0-
RESTAURANT: 395 SEATS
HOUSING: 348 D.U.
The following table shows the 1988 Overall Plan compared to the proposed amendment:
I PARCEL A: HOUSING 406 D.U. I DEVELOPED WITH 98 D.U. I
PARCEL B: THEATRE 39,050 s.f.
OFFICE 106,900 s.f.
PARCEL C: HOUSING 276 D.U.
PARCEL D: RETAIL 201,600 s.f.
PARCEL E: HOUSING 403 D.U.
DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO MASTER
PLAN
DEVELOPED WITH 250 D.U.
DEVELOPED AS PLANNED
ELIMINATED AND SPACE
INCORPORATED INTO PARCEL F
OFFICE 1,160,000 s.f.
HOTEL ELIMINATED - DEVELOPED AS
RESTAURANT WITH 395 SEATS
I OFFICE: 1,256,900 s.f. I OFFICE: 1,266,900 s.f.
Staff supports the proposed plan amendment. Eliminating the residential component and
spreading the same amount of office space over the entire parcel significantly reduces the
crowding of buildings and parking facilities. However, Planner Larsen noted that even with
staff support, several details need to be addressed during the final site plan approval for
each building:
A.
B.
Curb cut location on Edinborough Way
Curb cut location on West 76th Street
Page 2
MinutedEdina Citv Council/September 5,1995
C.
D.
E. Tramway circulation pattern
F.
Approval of curb cut on France Avenue by Hennepin County
Lake size, shape and capacity
Parking structure setbacks; location and amount of lots and ramps (proposed
development requires approximately 3,800 spaces)
Presentation bv Proponent
Boyd Stofer, President of United Properties, said United Properties has been involved in
this project since inception in 1988. The proposed amendment is a part of a master plan
redevelopment that includes 25% of the 100 acres devoted to public park developed in a
publidprivate partnership. Mr. Stofer stated that throughout the entire development process,
United Properties has worked closely with City staff to develop a plan responding to both the
public as well as private needs. The proposed amendment would continue the public park,
transportation hub, the pedestrian walkways, and landscaping that has formed the concept
of the already completed park. Mr. Stofer explained that after seven years, a plan
modification is now desirable because the market has undergone a major change and it is
economically feasible to develop attractive office buildings within the 25 acre site. With the
proposed amendment, the Overall Development Plan would be completed with one million
square feet less of floor space than was approved in 1988.
I Mr. Stofer said United Properties has received letters from both Centennial Lakes and
Edinborough Homeowners Associations with concerns and questions. He believes these
concerns expressed will be answered during the presentation.
Brian Carey, United Properties Development Director, I) reviewed the approved 1988
Overall Development Plan and the proposed amendment, 2) gave reasons for the changes
in the plan and 3) addressed residents’ concerns as well as Planning Commission and staff
concerns.
Mr. Carey stated the 1988 Overall Development Plan approved four large ofice towers of
approximately 300,000 square feet each. Present market conditions indicate a much smaller
demand exists for 300,000 and 400,000 square feet office buildings. Thus, the amended
proposal depicts mid-rise office units constructed on France Avenue taking advantage of the
grade and capitalizing on location. Location is a necessity for new Class “A” office space,
which France Avenue would guarantee as well as the additional amenities of covered
parking and food service.
Jim Benshoof, Traffic Consultant with Benshoof and Associates, explained that the resultant
traffic with the proposed plan amendment would be a reduced by approximately 1700 fewer
trips daily from the original plan. Fewer trips would be the result of a reduction in area
density by 900,000 to 1,000,000 square feet of occupiable office space. The ramp at 76th
Street and Edinborough Way would have significant landscaping and could be made very
attractive. He also stated that a change to the five story 76th Street ramp not depicted on
the plan, would be to construct two levels below grade, one level at grade and two levels
above grade.
Page 3
MinutedEdina City Council/September 5. 1995
Howard Stewart, Architect with Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart and Associates of
Atlanta, explained that he has worked with United Properties since the 1980’s. He
presented a slide display depicting architectural designs similar to the amended proposal.
The architectural focus was to shift masses, reduce the total number of buildings and
reorient them from Edinborough Way. Office buildings make good neighbors with quiet
nights and weekends. Mr. Stewart concluded with his belief that the proposed amendment
improves the Overall Development Plan.
I
Resident Comment
Dennis Siemers, President of the Edinborough Homeowners Association, voiced surprise
with the proposal and its dramatic disregard for the well-being of Edinborough residents.
Edinborough is a fantastic place to live but why are they now being blocked in like a prison.
He indicated his main concerns were that the 1) residential housing has been eliminated in
the proposal, 2) parking ramps will be a major eyesore and 3) traffic will be a burden with
the major office development planned on Edinborough Way. Mr. Siemers suggested re-
orienting the development 180 degrees towards France Avenue. He asked United Properties
why this wasn’t considered. He felt the audience should know that the Planning Commission
denied the proposal with a seven to one vote at their August 2, 1995, meeting. The letter
of notification contained a technical error that confused residents, that the property was
located west of France Avenue when actually it is east. He presented a petition with 320
residents signatures to the Council, against the proposal.
Albert Mayer, Vice President of the Centennial Lakes Homeowners Association, said he
personally could not speak about anything in the area previous to 1992 but residents feel
that 1) Edina is a residential community, 2) their property will be devalued, 3) the proposal
shows no smooth transition between residential and commercial, 4) housing would be a
more desirable buffer between residential and commercial, 5) the 15 story office building
should be built on France Avenue rather than Edinborough Way to fit with the Francel76th
area, 6) Minnesota Drive from Edinborough Way to France Avenue drops 30 feet making
buildings less obtrusive, 7) if proposal gains approval, ramps should be below grade to
minimize loss of aesthetics, 8) additional traffic would be better handled by France Avenue
rather than Edinborough Way, and 9) they would recommended a traffic study be done at
8:OO A.M. and 500 P.M.
Kathleen Kuha, 7621 Edinborough Way, said she concurs with the previous speaker but
Edinborough Way is a frightful place to put a traffic stop because of the curve. The
drawings depicting mature trees are attractive but the footprint of the ramps is enormous.
She asked if additional berming is being proposed and questioned why the area was being
developed in this fashion at all. On Labor Day she drove around and every existing office
building has ‘For Lease’ signs on them and questioned why more office space is being
proposed. Good aesthetics is important for occupants of the offices but having a bunker
across from her residence is a problem to her.
Brock Buehler, 7635 Edinborough Way, asked why a restaurant is being proposed now and
questioned whether a Class “A” office building had always been planned. Traffic numbers
Page 4
MinutesIEdina City Council/September 5,1995
at a reduction of 1700 trips per day seems wrong; he asked if additional study could be
done. He questioned why the office building is being proposed at the high end of the grade
rather than at the low end. A revision has already been proposed for the ramps and he
asked if they could be further reduced to one to two stories above grade.
Pat Boettger, 7609 Edinborough Way, asked further clarification on the reduction of trips in
the area. He believed the City is walking into a snafu at Minnesota Drive and 76th Street
during rush hour, especially as concerned with emergency vehicles.
Debbie Sit, 7601 Edinborough Way, said when she bought her unit in 1988, over half of the
residents were single women and there was a sense of security for them. She believes her
sense of security will be taken away with a wall of parking garages.
Marielle Lachambre, 7601 Edinborough Way, said when she purchased her unit, she
believed a multi-level family building would be built in the area. With the amended plan,
her home will face a parking lot and she believes her property will be devalued instantly. She
asked the Council to take the responsibility to I) look at what will happen to the residents
quiet community, 2) scale the development away from the residents and towards
commercial and 3) seriously consider putting as much parking below grade as is possible.
John Glavan, 7615 Edinborough Way, stated residents view the area as a real community
and not an urban area. He has gleaned from conversations with other residents that the
1988 plan was not all that great. It is more desirable to attract families to the area to
maintain the community rather than empty offices. If the amended plan receives approval
tonight, what assurance do the residents have that the market won’t dictate another change
to the plan in the future.
Sandra Stoltz, 7520 Edinborough Way, said her unit faces 76th Street and she is very proud
of her home. If 1700 trips per day have been eliminated from the area with the new
amended plan, how many actual trips are expected for the area. She voiced concern with
1) changes in air quality with the number of cars increasing and, 2) her property being
devalued, 3) safety while walking Centennial Lakes, 4) will other office buildings in Edina
deteriorate, and 5) how long construction will take on Phase I and Phase 11 and what steps
are being taken to control noise and traffic during this time.
Megan Maloney, 761 8 York Avenue South, explained that she was one of the first property
owners at Edinborough and she has watched progress on the development. She does not
believe more commercial property is the best idea. She asked the Planning Commission and
Council to become more consistent with the development around the award winning
Edinborough and Centennial Lakes. Ms. Maloney said most of the area residents have a
difficult time understanding what one million square feet of commercial is or when traffic is
lowered - lowered to what. She raised concern with safety of the seniors living in the area.
If the project receives approval, will residents of the area be assessed to pay for it. She
further inquired what benefit the city derives from the proposal. I
Page 5
MinutedEdina City CounciVSepternber 5, 2995
Sandra Hammers, 7520 Edinborough Way, commented that she is proud to live at
Centennial Lakes. When the Coventry townhomes were proposed, Mr. Laukka and Mr.
Jarvis made sure that upon entering the area you would not immediately be confronted with
driveways and garages. All residents at the Coventry have underground, heated parking.
She inquired why the proposed amendment could not be built with all underground, heated
parking also.
I
Orrin Field, 7440 Edinborough Way, an Edina resident for 35 years and a registered
architect said he did some measuring of the plans and the parking ramp on the corner is
huge. He informed Council that in order for emergency vehicles to utilize parking ramps,
ceilings must be 12 feet high with an additional safety wall of six feet on the top floor
creating a very unfortunate situation even for residents on the third floor.
Bob Roberti, 7601 Edinborough Way, stated that parking lots are attractive nuisances. He
voiced concern that the police would need to be posted to keep kids from utilizing them for
rollerblading or skateboarding. He further commented that the concentration of cars in the
same location at the same time would be like two 747's landing on the same runway at the
same time.
Joel Alberts, 7635 Edinborough Way, said he likes the quiet peace of the area and fears the
residential aspect will be taken away. He questioned why the developer has not held focus
group meetings to inform residents of the proposed plan amendment.
Angela Kamstra, 7635 Edinborough Way, voiced anger with her safety being taken away,
as a single female. She reminded the Council that condominiums have 'one' view and if it
is obliterated with a parking ramp, it's gone. She further voiced concern with her property
being devalued if the proposed plan gains approval.
I
Leo DW, 761 5 Edinborough Way, stated his opposition to the proposal. In 1988 there was
a glimmer of sky to the west, with the new development that will be gone.
Judy Bezanson, 7635 Edinborough Way, indicated this is a gorgeous area and how
wonderful it would be to live and work in the same place. She inquired where the park would
be located.
Rose Carlson, 7625 Edinborough Way, asked why if the office development was not needed
in 1988, do we need more office space now.
Gus Gulsvig, 7400 Edinborough Way, said after visiting the area, he sold his home in Texas
which his wife designed to move to the most unique area in the world. He asked that the
concept not be changed to commercial.
Connie Larsen, 7520 Edinborough Way, voiced concern with traffic being bad now, what will
happen when the proposed plan is completed.
Page 6
MinuteslEdina Citv Council/SeDtember 5,1995
ProDonent's Response and Comments
Jim Benshoof, Benshoof and Associates, explained that to project traffic flow, traffic counts
were taken including rush hour, information was gathered from Hennepin County and then
the projections were made. He stated that 76th Street and Edinborough could be utilized
as four lane roads and that with additional traffic signals the area would have adequate
traffic capacity.
Brian Carey, United Properties Development Director, thanked the public for the positive
remarks regarding the completed portion of the development. He looked at the proposal as
a modification in the 1988 concept only and said this would be a critical development for the
community. Consideration had been given to reorient the buildings but it is not economically
feasible . The plan is being presented for reasons as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Visibility is essential for commercial entities to be economically feasible,
Proposing all parking be underground would add 20% to the cost,
Air quality as addressed in 1988 studies would not change nor would noise increase,
The proposed park will be seven acres in size, and
Office space is now in demand, not like in 1988. Office buildings will not be built if
there isn't a demand.
Council Comment
Mayor Richards said after examining the whole picture, a mixed use development consisting
of retail, housing, office and public use is best for all disciplines. It is not anyone's desire
to do anything to diminish the neighborhood. Waters are publicly owned at all parks and the
amended proposal would complete the area. Historically, the City does it's planning in
advance and compared to the 1988 plan, this works. Mayor Richards took exception with the
comment that parking ramps in Edina were attractive nuisances. Ramps in Edina have been
safe in the past. The Urban Land publication calls this development the best anywhere. He
believes the area should be completed.
Member Maetzold concurred with the Mayor's comments and reminded the audience that
the area could be used for a power shopping center rather than the proposed use. The
amended plan is quite similar to the I988 plan, but the concern is with the elevation of the
ramps. He believes proper landscaping will create an acceptable view and he would support
approval of the amended plan.
Member Paulus elaborated that this is not an isolated neighborhood and reminded the public
that the Council votes in the best interest of the whole community. Homeowners have a
personal responsibility to keep apprised of any change or proposed development in their
area. Wth completion of the area, she believes the demand for homes will only increase and
values will be retained. Member Paulus noted that historically, commercial offices do not
show an increase in crime rates. Further, a misconception exists that this is a quiet nature
area. How this could be possible with Highway 494 and National Car Rental abutting the
neighborhood. This neighborhood was planned when Hedberg concrete was removed. She
feels it is a good plan and supports the amendment.
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/September 5. 1995
Member Kelly admitted that eleven years ago she was against the public portion of the
project but has now changed her mind. She voiced approval of the concept as presented
with the exception of the height of the parking ramps.
I
Member Smith recalled that many people wanted to do different things with this parcel. He
thanked Larry Laukka for his mixed use idea and with the outcome. He said parking ramps
have always been a part of the plan although he shares a concern with their height. He
pointed out that all of Edina has an investment in the park and surrounding property and
noted that the Council would be examining all plans during the construction. He would
support the proposal as presented.
Mayor Richards asked clarification if the amendment would be approved, would it include
1) landscaping both east and west on Edinborough Way, 2) like materials would be used on
the office buildings and ramps, and 3) the northeast parking ramp would be reduced to five
levels, not six as depicted on the plan presented. He asked the possibility of the plantings
along east Edinborough Way being done as part of the first phase allowing them to mature
and possibly buffer future construction. Mr. Stofer answered he would be willing to do this.
Mayor Richards suggested the proponent work with the associations.
Mayor Richards called for further public comment or concern. No further comment was
received.
Member Smith made a motion to approve the overall development plan amendment
for Parcels E & F, Centennial Lakes, United Properties, conditioned upon, 1)
addressing the location of the Edinborough Way curb cut, 2) addressing the location
of the proposed West 76th Street curb cut, 3) Hennepin County approval of an
additional curb cut on France Avenue, 4) the size, shape and capacity of the lake, 5)
circulation of the tramway pattern, 6) setbacks for the proposed parking structures
and amount of parking and location of parking lots and ramps, 7) additional
landscaping on east Edinborough Way, 8) reduction in height of northeast ramp to 5
stones, 9) like materials on both buildings and ramps and IO) the developer to work
with the associations. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
I
Member Kelly offered an amendment to the motion that the developer be required to
appear before the Council with each new portion of the development. Motion died for
lack of a second.
Mayor Richards called the question.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 18,1995, SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion
was made by Member Maetzold and was seconded by Member Smith setting
Page 8
MinuteslEdina Citv Council/September 5.1995
I September 18,1995, for the following planning matters:
I)
2)
Preliminary Rezoning, R-I, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD-I Planned Office
District, 5015 West 70th Street, Especially for Children; and
Preliminary Plat Approval and Final Development Plan for Kunz Oil, 5200 Eden
Avenue.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
"BID AWARDED FOR WATER MAIN (WM-317A). CURB AND GUTTER AND STORM
SEWER (BA-3081 Motion was made by Member Maetzold and was seconded by
Member Smith for award of bid for watermain at Fuller Street and West 55th Street;
Curb and Gutter and Storm Sewer for Lakeview Drive to recommended low bidder,
Penn Contracting, Inc., at $262,744.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON WATER SERVICE TO 4119 WEST 62ND STREET Assistant
Manager Hughes explained that July 31 , 1995, a notice was sent Dr. Byron Armstrong of
41 19 West 62nd Street, advising Dr. Armstrong of the City's intent to terminate his water
service for non-payment of sewer and water charges totaling $334.49. Dr. Armstrong
exercised his rights under Section I I00 of the City Code and requested an opportunity to
be heard by the City Council. Accordingly, the City may not terminate the water service until
the hearing has been conducted.
Assistant Manager Hughes stated that City staff attempted to resolve the matter per his
letter dated August 24, 1995 to which Dr. Armstrong did not respond. He reviewed Council's
options which are to: I) order termination of the water service, 2) certify delinquent charges
to Hennepin County for collection with the 1996 payable taxes or, 3) authorize collection of
the delinquent charges by other means permitted by law. Staff recommends that delinquent
charges be certified to the County for collection with the 1996 payable taxes and Dr.
Armstrong be advised that future delinquencies would result in termination of water service.
I
Dr. Armstrong commented that he has not been able to get an answer from the water
department regarding charges during the 15 months he was not living in his home. Assistant
Manager Hughes said a detailed accounting of the bill had been submitted with the August
24, 1995, letter explaining that from May 8, 1992, to November 5, 1993, the bill reached
$541 -70. A credit has been applied for that portion of time, reducing the amount owing to
$334.49.
Member Smith made a motion that the outstanding water bill at 41 I9 West 62nd Street
be paid within three days or I) the charges would be certified to Hennepin County for
collection with taxes due and payable in 1996, and 2) the property owner be advised
that future delinquencies would result in termination of the water service. Member Kelly
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Page 9
MinuteslEdina City CouncillSeptember 5, 1995
Motion carried. I
ISSUANCE OF 3.2 BEER LICENSE FOR DAVANNI’S CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 18.
1995 Member Smith said he requested the issuance of the 3.2 beer license for Davanni’s
removed from the consent agenda for further clarification of the Ordinance whether ordering
food is a requirement in the issuing of a 3.2 beer license as it is with strong beer.
After a brief discussion, Council consensus was to continue the issuance of the license for
Davanni’s to the September 18, 1995, meeting to allow clarification of the ordinance and
additional information to come forward.
BUILDING OFFICIAL INTRODUCED Manager Rosland introduced Ron Wasmund, the new
Building Official. Mr. Wasmund held the position of Community Development Director in
Rosemount, prior to coming to Edina.
1996 PROPOSED BUDGET ADOPTED AND 1996 TAX LEVY ESTABLISHED Mayor
Richards reminded the Council that action .must be taken to adopt a proposed budget and
tax levy for 1996 for certification to Hennepin County.
Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed 1996 budget. No comment or
objection was heard.
Mayor Richards moved adoption of the following resolution reflecting a 4.97% I
increase in expenditures for 1996:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEARS 1996, AND ESTABLISHING
PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR THE 1996 PAYABLE IN 1996
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section I. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1996, is hereby
proposed as follows:
Section 2. Estimated receipts other General Tax Levy, including HACA aid, are hereby
proposed as follows:
Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal
property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows:
Adopted this 5th day of September, 1995.
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $1 6,504,290
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $4,325,850
FOR GENERAL FUND $1 2, I 78,440
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted I TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING DATE SET Manager Rosland reminded Council that the
Page 10
MinuteslEdina Citv Council/September 5.1995
I City is required to inform Hennepin County of its Truth in Taxation hearing dates. Truth in
Taxation hearings for all governmental bodies must be held during the period November 29
through December 20, 1995.
Member Smith made a motion setting November 29,1995, at 5:OO P.M. for the Truth
in Taxation hearing and December 15,1995, at 5:OO P.M. as the continuation hearing
date. Motion was seconded by Member Maetzold.
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Mayor Richards noted he would be abstaining from the final vote because
a family member has submitted a claim for payment. Member Kelly made a motion to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated August 30, 1995, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $310,489.09;
C.D.B.G. $4,760.00; Communication $6,245.85; Working Capital $I ,831.67; Art Center
$7,805.46; Swimming Pool $1,546.55; Golf Course $51,175.56; Ice Arena $17,036.00;
Gun Range $105.52; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $23,162.75; Utility Fund
$306,478.97; Storm Sewer $3,348.73; Recycling $1 53.00; Liquor Fund $74,858.1 I;
Construction Fund $6,379.1 I; IBR #2 Fund $646.25; TOTAL $816,022.62. Motion was
seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith
Abstaining: Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:23 P.M.
City Clerk
!ah nq
Page I1