Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19990119_regularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HELD AT CITY HALL EDINA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19,1999 - 200 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall. were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold and Mayor Smith. CITY ENGINEER HOFFMAN RECOGNIZED Manager Hughes informed the Council that City Engineer Hoffman recently received the City Engineer of the Year Award from the City Engineer's Association of Minnesota. EDINA HIGH SCHOOL CAREER EXPLOSION ANNOUNCED Edina High School student Mike Johnson shared information on the Career Explosion being held February 1,1999, from 5:OO - 8:OO P.M., at the High School. The venture is a joint project between the Edina Public Schools and the Edina Chamber of Commerce and is sponsored by Fairview Southdale Hospital. Three City departments will be represented at the 'Explosion' to explain career opportunities within the City. APPOINTMENT OF FIRE CHIEF ANNOUNCED Manager Hughes introduced to the Council Marty Scheerer the newly appointed Fire Chief for Edina. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: I Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 21,1998, YEAR END MEETING OF DECEMBER 29,1998, AND REGULAR MEETING OF TANUARY 4,1999, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 21,1998, Year End Meeting of December 29,1998, and the Regular Meeting of January 4,1999, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CONCEPT PLAN FOR PAMELA LAKWAMELA PARK WETLAND RESTORATION AND WATER QUALITY PROTECT APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation bv Engineer - Engineer Hoffman stated that Pamela Park has been in existence since around 1901. He displayed an aerial photograph from 1960 showing the lake wetland area as it existed previously. Over the years the lake quality and depth have been degraded due to pollution and run-off. The lake has become very shallow and susceptible to infestation with weeds. Engineer Hoffman explained that the staff has been working with the neighbors concerning the condition of Pamela Lake. In addition, he noted the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has been in contact with staff regarding development of a water qualify ponding program in this sub-region of the Watershed District. Engineer Hoffman said that staff working with Barr Engineering has I Page 1 Minutes/Edina City CouncWanuarv 19,1999 developed a concept plan for a proposed Wetland/Lake Restoration and Water Quality Ponding Improvement for the Pamela Park and Pamela Lake areas. Engineer Hoffman added the proposed project would include: 1. Partial dredging of Pamela lake; 2. Creating smaller ponding area entering Pamela Lake to reduce sediment from storm sewer reaching Pamela Lake; 3. Construction of a series of smaller water quality/wetland ponds on the northerly end of Pamela Park to intercept two large stormwater drainage area before they enter Minnehaha Creek; and 4. Construction of a north/south pathway near these wetlands and ponds to create a walking/nature trail such as exists in the Lake Cornelia and Bredeson Park areas. He noted that the proposed improvements will not impact any actively scheduled portion of Pamela Park, but will instead utilize passive park areas and already existing wetlands. Engineer Hoffman stated the proposed project is before the Cound for concept approval only. After the public hearing the following steps would be needed 1. Approach the Watershed; 2. Watershed and City conduct a feasibility study; 3. Watershed holds a public hearing; 4. Joint project ordered by both Watershed and City; 5. Permits acquired from necessary government agencies (DNR); 6. Joint Powers Agreement between Watershed and City; and 7. Construction of ponds/rehabilitation of Pamela Lake I Staff will present the plan to the Park Board for review, and the Council will have an opportunity to review the plan after its feasibility is determined. Member Maetzold asked staff to summarize potential financing for the proposed project. Engineer Hoffman explained the majority of the project would be financed through the watershed with a portion coming from the stormwater utility fund. Member Faust asked how the purple loose strife would be eradicated from the lake. Engineer Hoffman responded that the City would work with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, but most likely would use some type of chemical treatment. Engineer Hoffman, introduced Monica Gross, a member of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Board of Directors. Ms. Gross said she was the Watershed District’s liaison to Edina. She indicated that ale Watershed would be interested in the proposed project because of the potential for phosphorus removal from stormwater. Ms. Gross invited the Council and staff to contact her with any concerns. Mayor Smith opened the hearing for public comment as follows: I Public Comment Joe Goldberg, 5809 Brookview Avenue, expressed concern with the proposed ponds stating he believes the proposed improvements will bring flood water nearer to his home and increase the chances of him having water in his basement Engineer Hoffman explained that the proposed Page 2 Minutesmdina CiW Councimanuary 19,1999 , improvements to Pamela Lake and Park will not change the regional flooding and will marginally change the temporary holding capacity of the area. ’ Martin Freeman, 5637 Woodcrest Drive, stated he was concerned about: the drainage creek that drains into Minnehaha Creek; the aesthetics after the project; and how the project will affect property values. Engineer Hoffman explained that the drainage ditch Mr. Freeman referred to will remain, and that it is dredged about every ten years. He reiterated that the project is a water quality improvement, noting that wetlands are being restored, not filled in; and that the open area in Pamela Park will be used partially for the underground sanitary sewer tank on the east side, and the west side will be utilized for temporary storm water storage. Dave Watrud, 6109 Halifax Avenue, stated he thought the proposed project was a great idea. However, Mr. Watrud asked what was proposed for the wooded area south to France Avenue, and what happens to the little creek behind his property. Engineer Hoffn-tan responded that there is a plan to do some dredging, but the little creek Mr. Watrud referred to will remain. Annemarie Rogers, 5641 Woodcrest Drive, expressed concern over the construction shed on the east side of Pamela Park, and the creek on the north end of Pamela Park. Engineer Hoffman explained the drainage ditch on the north end of the park will remain primarily a flood control ditch. He added that after the construction of the underground sanitary sewer tank is complete, there will be some collars visible above the ground, but the field will be re-seeded and restored. Scott Armstrong, 5800 Halifax Avenue, stated he was excited about the project, but had concern about the area near West 58th Street. Mr. Armstrong suggested re-locating the wetlands to allow more passive play area. Mr. Armstrong also asked if the area would be dredged where the culvert meets the creek. Engineer Hoffman reiterated there will be no new water directed onto the site, He added the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will not allow the area Mr. Armstrong asked about to be dredged. Barbara Hultmann, 5817 Brookview Avenue, asked if she understood correctly that there should be no difference in the amount of water in the area. Ms. Hultmann said that to her it looked as if dirt was being removed to create a larger bowl. Engineer Hoffman acknowledged that the improvement will most likely provide short term storage of storm water and that Ms. Hultmann understood correctly. Christa Hudson, 6008 Halifax Avenue, stated she is excited about the project because she has seen the deterioration over the years. Ms. Hudson hoped chemical treatment to Pamela Lake will able to be reduced as a result of the project. She added that she and her family are heavy users of the park, and her concerns are more with the ecology of the area than with developing more play areas. Carol Carmichael, 6112 Brookview Avenue, explained that she was a twenty-five year resident and had many questions about the proposed project. She asked when and how the plan originated. Ms. Carmichael said she was very concerned about: wild life nesting areas; the dumping of snow in Pamela Park; how one joins the Pamela Lake Association; and overflow parking in the area. Engineer Hoffman replied the proposed project is a water quality improvement. The neighborhood residents on the east side of the lake had approached the City two or three years ago. Staff met with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and asked if there were any funds for a water quality improvement in the area. The concept has been reviewed by the Watershed District and the Page 3 Minutes/Edina Citv Councivranuary 19,1999 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources who have made suggestions and also told the City where they may dredge. Engineer Hoffman acknowledged that the City has been dumping snow off 50t” Street in the Park, adding that a new location for the snow is being sought. He concluded that all the improvements proposed are passive in nature and should not impact parking needs. I John Peterson, 5820 Brookview Avenue, asked if area storm sewers will empty into the proposed ponds. Mr. Peterson asked if there was not a weir under 58th Street going into Minnehaha Creek. Engineer Hoffman explained the ponds will have water in them all the time and that the 5W Street weir will be reviewed. Paul Schoenecker, 6024 Halifax Avenue, stated he was representing the Pamela Lake Association. Mr. Schoenecker explained that he lived on Pamela Lake in the 70’s when the lake was six to eight feet deep and wildlife prospered. Over the years run-off has filled in and polluted the lake. Mr. Schoenecker and some neighbors formed a coalition (Pamela Lake Association) with the common interest of restoring Pamela Lake. The Association then approached the City with their concern over the potential death of the lake. Mr. Schoenecker presented a petition that stated, “We the neighbors of Pamela Park/Lake endorse the proposed Wetland/Lake Restoration and Water Quality Improvement It is our understanding the project will not result in any special assessments.” Mr. Schoenecker stated the petition presented contained approximately 180 signatures from residents in the Pamela Park/Lake area. He added that common comments heard by the neighborhood canvassers included it’s about time and I was worried about the Lake. Mr. Schoenecker said it seems there is a window of opportunity to work with the City and the Watershed District to restore Pamela Lake to its former state. He urged the Comcil to take advantage of the opporfxnity. Bob Winter, 4200 Philbrook Lane, expressed concern that the storage pond will be located right next to his basement. He was worried about seepage. Engineer Hoffman stated this can be looked at during the project’s design to mitigate any risk to Mr. Winter. I Mary Engelke, 4201 Philbrook Lane, voiced concern about seepage from the holding pond also. Ms. Engelke was concerned that the ponds would take away play area. She asked if basketball courts could be installed behind the tennis court. Engineer Hoffman explained the improvement will improve holding capacity during small rainfall events and no additional water will come into the area during a regional flood. Additionally, the proposed project will not use any currently scheduled play area. Giovana Ingram, 6000 France Avenue, voiced her support of the proposed improvement. However, Ms. Ingrm stated she has noticed many teens in the park old enough to drive who are damaging the grass with ATV’s and four wheel drive vehicles. She suggested the installation of some barrier to deter driving on the grass. Clara Gooding, 5824 Halifax Avenue, stated that there are many problems in the back of her home. She was concerned that the creek and woods behind the tennis courts and her home be preserved. Ms. Gooding said she and her husband have spent considerable effort to entice WildIife and beauidy their property; and she did not want to see the WildIife gone or her property damaged by flooding. Engineer Hoffman stated the proposed project should help with small rainfall events’ holding capacity and that no more water will come into the area during a regional flooding event. Council Discussion Page 4 MinutesEdina City Councimanuary 19,1999 Mayor Smith asked how the project would proceed and does Edina retain design control. He endorsed the projec,t pointing out it was a water quality4 project. Engineer Hoffman explained that if the proposed project is given concept plan approval then staff will work with the Watershed District to design a plan and bring it back before the City Council. Member Hovland stated conceptually the proposed improvement is terrific. He commended the Pamela Lake Association for their initiative. Member Faust voiced her support of the project. She added she remembers playing with friends at Pamela Lake during the 50's. Member Maetzold voiced his support for the project. Member Kelly reiterated previous Council members support. understood the proposed project should bring no new water into the area. He added he hoped people Motion by Member Faust and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the Concept Plan for the Pamela Lakepamela Park Wetland Restoration and Water Quality Project. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. DRAFT LIQUOR ORDINANCE AND POLICY DISCUSSED Manager Hughes explained that as instructed January 4,1999, staff has prepared the draft ordinance regulating the issuance of on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses. The draft also reformatted the entire liquor code improving its readability. Additionally, a draft resolution was prepared, providing a policy statement for the issuance of the initial licenses. The resolution contemplates that license applications will first be received from restaurants currently holding on-sale wine licenses. Following receipt of such applications, the Council would be in a better position to establish criteria for issuing the remaining licenses. Manager Hughes pointed out some highlights from the draft ordinance: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Section-900.04 A. - On-SaleClub Liquor License - Limits Club licenses to establishments possessing licenses on December 31,1998; Section 900.04 F. - Temporary On-sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses - Continues limiting issuance to the Edina Foundation once per calendar year; Section 900.06 - Public Hearing Requirement - Prior to issuance of new intoxicating licenses - public hearing must be held but is not required upon renewal or transfer; Section 900.07 - Refunds - Provided for the first time under specific conditions, they are entitled to a pro-rata refund based upon months of operation - added because of sigruficant application fee; Section 900.08 N. - One Intoxicating Liquor License allowed per person - may be concern for some existing restaurants; Section 900.09 Subd 5 - Limits eligible locations for licenses to PCD-2, PCD-3 or Mixed Development District - not allowed in C-2; should not be allowed in building containing more than 150 seats due to parking concern and have limited it to 150 seats; and Section 900.10 - Subd 16 - Adult Entertainment Prohibited - clarified that any establishment with an adult entertainment component would not be allowed to have a liquor license. Page 5 MinuteslEdina City Council/ranuary 19,1999 Manager Hughes reviewed a draft resolution that could provide a policy statement for issuance of the initial licenses. The resolution would allow license applications to be received from restaurants holding on-sale wine licenses for a specified period. Following receipt of such applications, in staff's opinion, the Council could better determine criteria for issuance of the remaining licenses. Following a brief Council discussion, Tuesday, February 16,1999, was set for the hearing date on the issuance of on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses. Mayor Smith reminded the Council the draft ordinance will be back before the Council on February 1, 1999, and the public hearing held on February 16,1999. council comments: Mayor Smith inquired who were the 'certain organizations' referred to in Section 900.04 G. Manager Hughes said they are non-profits and are defined later in the draft ordinance. Mayor Smith further questioned 900.04 - Proof of Financial Responsibility. Manager Hughes explained it is an insurance requirement imposed by Statute. Mayor Smith asked if the Edina Police Department could be included in 900.04 D. He believes the CPA certification should automatically be required within the process of licensing. Mayor Smith turned the remainder of the Council meeting over to Mayor Pro-tem Maetzold and left the Council Chambers Member Kelly said he had nothing further to add. He believes the draft ordinance looks terrific and he would not change anything. He voiced some concern with the preference period and questioned whether it is necessary to have one, but would concur with the 30 days. Member Faust asked if 44" & France is being eliminated from the allowable locations. Manager Hughes said the locations being proposed to be eliminated are mainly the PCD-1 locations - 44th & France, Wooddale & Valley View and 70th & Cahill. Member Faust clarified we would then have the 50th area, greater Southdale and Grandview areas. Manager Hughes added plus the Mixed Development District of Edinborough/Centennial Lakes. Member Faust believed previously the number of licenses was going to start with 10 and go up after that point after we saw how it all worked. Manager Hughes replied the number of licenses issued will be a Council decision. The resolution allowed a preference period for the wine licensees. If all the wine licensees applied and all were issued, 16 of the allowable 19 licenses would be used. Manager Hughes believes not all 16 wine license holders will apply for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license. A decision on a cap would be easier to make after having heard and decided upon all the existing wine licensees. Member Faust asked if legally it would easier to set a limit before the applications are submitted rather than after. Manager Hughes said he and Attorney Gilligan had a concern with granting a preference to the wine licensees and then imposing a cap that would not accommodate all of them. Mayor Pro- tem Maetzold asked if we had 16 eligible and the cap is set at 10, how would the 10 be decided upon. Member Kelly stated that was the reason he questioned whether preferences were a good idea or not. Manager Hughes said it seems if the Council wishes to have a cap, it is best to then not have a preference. Member Kelly said if all 16 licensees apply that is not positive, but he believes this will not happen. Member Faust asked how the number could be limited ahead of time. Manager Hughes said a limit could be enacted by resolution. Member Faust asked if the criteria would need to be established aliead of time so we would not be discriminating after we see the applications and who would we prefer. Attorney Gilligan stated a fair amount of discreGon exists in Page 6 MinutesBdina Citv Counciwanuarv 19,1999 picking and choosing between applicants as long as it is not discriminatory and a reasonable basis exists for doing it. Member Faust said she .believes itlwouldtbe easier to limit the number ahead of time. Attorney Gilligan said the message needs to get out that just because you apply does not mean you will be licensed. Member Faust asked if the Council consensus is that the number should be limited now. Member Kelly said he does not feel strongly about it one way or the other. He has trouble with the preference because if you are an existing restaurateur in the City and want a liquor license, you will apply immediately for an evaluation whether the City gives them a preference or not. He further does not believe preferences later will be a big issue. If we want to restrict the number it makes sense to get rid of the preference. He would like to see some new, high-quality, fine-dining restaurants come into the City. Member Faust felt the City should go slowly, and can always decide after the fact if we believe 13,14, or 15 are all right but we could not go back. Mayor Pro-tem Maetzold said he likes the concept of giving preference to the wine licensees. They have made an investment in the community and have passed licensing requirements already and he believes they should have preference. As long as Attorney Gilligan stated the number could be reduced at a later date he would favor not putting on a cap. Member Hovland asked clarification from Attorney Gilligan that the Council would have flexibility in making subsequent determinations as to who we wanted to have licenses should we decide to limit our licenses at our statutory predetermined number. He knows we have the legal ability to waive off the cap, as Bloomington has done, and could expand the number of licenses. Attorney Gilligan said the residents of Edina would have to vote on whether to raise the number of licenses over 19. Member Hovland said after we see who applies during the 30 day period and after determining how many licenses we want to issue, he would be comfortable with letting the existing wine license holders come forward first and have a 30 day preference. He concurs with Mayor Pro- tem Maetzold that existing wine licensees should be given a running start. He concluded he is comfortable with the way the ordinance is drafted. Member Hovland questioned the definition of hotel. Attorney Gilligan answered the definition is directly out of the State Statute. Member Hovland asked about Section 900.06 where the ordinance states no hearing will be required for renewal of the license which makes sense, but questioned the transfer of an existing on-sale intoxicating liquor license. He examined Section 900.13 showing a restriction on a license. He inquired whether the word "license" should be included in the definitions as defined in Section 900.04. When it is stated as restrictions on transfer of license and with no definition included, it could become ambiguous as to which license is restricted for transfer. He noted the person applying (transferee) would have to apply as if he were a new owner. If an applicant is applying in the same manner a new owner would, but is buying a license from someone else, he should have to comply with all hearing requirements as a new owner. Attorney Gilligan said if liquor were already served at that premise, a hearing could be required on a license transfer. Member Hovland asked if any public issues could be particular to the proposed transferee and should be addressed in a public hearing. Attorney Gilligan answered a public hearing could be held if the existing operation would change a great deal. Background checks and investigations are done just as if it were a new applicant. Member Kelly stated he believes the review process is covered well in the proposed ordinance. Member Hovland asked clarification of the return of investigation fees. Manager Hughes said we have always refunded investigative fees' monies not spent as required by Statute. The change recommended is with the application fee and the existing ordinance does not allow refunding. Member Hovland again asked about the definition of hotel and asked if we are avoiding dealing Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/ranuarv 19,1999 wih hotels. Attorney Gilligan said a hotel is subject to the same limitations on bar seating, but is done on a hotel wide basis as well as the percentage of sales. Manager Hughes said the ordinance should clardy that hotels will be viewed collectively rather than incrementally. Attorney Gilligan said it was anticipated the license would be issued to the hotel as a licensed premises. Member Maetzold asked what happens if a bottle (in its original package) of liquor is delivered to a room. Does the City want to permit this or not and would it be appropriate to say this in the ordinance. Manager Hughes said whether the bottle is opened or unopened is irrelevant. What the ordinance says is, liquor in any form in a room whether it be unopened or by the drink, the hotel has to comply. Manager Hughes offered that these questions within the proposed ordinance would be re-examined. Member Maetzold said the proposed ordinance states that no micro-brewing can take place on premises. Police Chief Bernhjelm stated that issue is dealt with in the State Statute and takes precedence over City ordinances. Manager Hughes said a micro-brewery is not a manufacturer under State Law. Member Hovland asked clarification of when a refund might be issued on an annual license fee. Manager Hughes explained the City may not be issuing on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses until after April 1, therefore, all wine licensed restaurants will have already purchased their licenses and could be entitled to a refund. He reminded there would be no need to hold a wine license if you have been issued an on-sale intoxicating liquor license. Member Maetzold inquired if a wine license is renewed on April 1st and they submit a on-sale intoxicating liquor application on May l", does a whole new investigation take place. Manager Hughes said staff's thought was that we can only extract an investigation fee equal to the amount we spend. If an investigation had just been completed for a wine license, there perhaps would not be any investigation for an intoxicating license. Their money might be refunded or a cursory review fee charged. I Member Faust asked if an elected official could be licensed to sell on-sale intoxicating liquor. Manager Hughes replied that under the existing code granting an elected official a license would be the Council's discretion, but the draft ordinance has language prohibiting a City employee or elected official from obtaining a liquor license. No formal Council action was taken. *RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 16,1999, FOR VACATION OF PORTION OF WEST 41ST STREET (4024 GRIMES AVENUE) Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Maehold approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION OF WEST 41ST STREET - 4024 GRIMES AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. It is hereby found an determined that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 42.348. Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at EO0 P.M. on the 16fh day of February, 1999, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. Page 8 MinutesEdina City Council//anuary 19,1999 (Official Publication) 'CITYOFEDINA ' 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON 4024 GRIMES AVENUE IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on February 16,1999 in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a public hearing for the proposed vacation of the following public street: The northerly thirty (30) feet of the unimproved portion of West 41st Street as platted in Morningside Oaks, South of Lot 9, Block 2, Morningside Oaks, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of @e proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. Dated this 19th day of January, 1999. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Adopted this 19th day of January, 1999. VACATION OF PORTION OF WEST 41ST STREET - I Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. HEARING DATE OF FEBRUARY 1,1999, SET FOR STREET NAME CHANGE - MCINTYRE ROAD TO MCINTYRE POINTE AND COUGAR COURT TO CHALICE COURT Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Maetzold setting a hearing date of February 1, 1999, to consider an ordinance changing the names of MacIntyre Court to MacIntyre Pointe and Cougar Court to Chalice Court. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. "HEARING DATE OF APRIL 12,1999, SET FOR 1999 BOARD OF REVIEW Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Maetzold setting April 12,1999,5:00 p.m. as hearing date f or 1999 Board of Review. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. STRATEGIC PLAN MEETING DATES SET Manager Hughes explained he recently met with Mark Koegler of the Hoisington Koegler Group for the purpose of establishing initial meeting dates with respect to the Edina Strategic Plan. Following a brief discussion, February 16, 1999, at 5:30 U Page 9 Minutesbdina City CounciVranuary 19,3999 P.M., at City Hall was set for a kick-off meeting. The Community Visioning Session was tentatively set for Braemar Golf Course on April 13 or April 15,1999, at 700 P.M. EDINA SUN-CURRENT EDITOR INTRODUCED Manager Hughes introduced and welcomed Jennifer Wilkinson, the newly assigned community editor of €dim Sun-Current. I CLAIMS PAID Member Hovland made a motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 13, 1999, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $566,699.08; Communications $10,094.70; Working Capital $6,206.89; Art Center $11,880.85; Golf Dome Fund $10,194.25; Swimming Pool Fund $314.84; Golf Course Fund $70,645.64; Ice Arena Fund $35307.93; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $28,306.13; Utility Fund $128,747.89; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $5,909.25; Recycling Program $34,101.17; Liquor Dispensary Fund $219,122.03; Construction Fund $117,177.38; Park Bond Fund $1,742.50; TOTAL $1,246,650.53; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 5, 1999, and consisting of 3 pages: General Fund $142,813.46; Communications $3,300.00; Working Capital $336.58; Art Center $2,766.75; Swimming Pool Fund $245.45; Golf Course Fund $12,112.00; Ice Arena Fund $5,058.79; Edinborough/(lentennial Lakes $161.46; Utility Fund $6,483.06; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $211.36; Liquor Dispensary Fund $106,428.28; 1-494 Commission $8,311.77; TOTAL $288,228.96. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting adjourned at 9:20 P.M. Page 10