Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-08-07Council Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 7,2001 200 P.M. I ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Agenda Item III.B., Street, Curb, Gutter for 7P Street and Highway 100 Interchange Contract 01-07 (Engineering). Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTIONS PRESENTED TO 4TH OF JULY PARADE COMMITTEE Mayor Maetzold presented Resolutions of Appreciation to the 4th of July Parade Committee and thanked them again for their tireless efforts in making the Parade an outstanding event. “MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TULY 17,2001, APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 17,2001, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. “HEARING DATE SET OF AUGUST 21, 2001 - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, REPLAT OF OUTLOT A PARKWOOD KNOLLS 25m ADDITION (PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh setting August 21,2001, as hearing date for Preliminary Plat Approval for Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition, Replat of Outlot A Parkwood Knolls 25& Addition (Parkwood Knolls Construction Company). Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. “RESOLUTION NO. 2001-54 ADOPTED APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR 4810/4812 BYWOOD WEST (TENSEN HOMES) Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh introducing the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-54 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 4810/4812 BYWOOD WEST WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present two single tracts of land NORTHERLY PARCEL: That part of Lot 41, Rolling Green, which lies southerly of a line bearing North 83 degrees 52 minutes East from a point in the Northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION distant 122.28 feet Southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn at a right angle to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 41 from a point therein distant 290 feet Northwesterly of the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 41, which corner is the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Page 1 MinutesEdha Citv Council/August - 7,2001 Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 117, Range 21; and Lot A, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION, except that part thereof which lies Northerly of a line bearing South 83 degrees 52 minutes West from a point in the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 122.28 feet Southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1. For purposes of this description, the Northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION is assured to bear South 38 degrees 04 minutes East. SOUTHERLY PARCEL Lot 2, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION. AND WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tracts into separate parcels (therein called "Parcels") described as follows: NORTHERLY PARCEL: That part of Lot 41, Rolling Green, which lies southerly of a line bearing North 843 degrees 52 minutes East from a point in the Northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION distant 122.28 feet Southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn at a right angle to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 41 from a point therein distant 290 feet Northwesterly of the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 41, which corner is the Northeast comer of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 117, Range 21; and Lot 1, Block 1, BECKSTROM Addition, except that part thereof which lies Northerly of a line bearing South 83 degrees 52 minutes West from a point in the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 122.28 feet Southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1. Also except that part of said Lot 1 which lies southerly of a line drawn east at right angles to the West line of said Lot 1 from a point thereon distant 56.00 feet north from the most southerly corner of said Lot 1. For purposes of this description, the Northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION is assumed to bear South 38 degrees 04 minutes East. AND SOUTHERLY PARCEL: Lot 2, Block 1, BECKSTROM ADDITION; ALSO, that part of Lot 1, said Block 1 which lies southerly of a line drawn east at right angles to the West line of said Lot 1 from a point thereon distant 56.00 feet North from the most southerly comer of said Lot 1. W€IEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances t Page 2 MinutesEdina City CounciVAugust 7,2001 of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 7th day of August, 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. “BID AWARDED FOR TWO SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK CHASSIS FOR PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh for award of bid for two single axle dump truck chassis to Boyer Trucks, Inc., under State Contract #425861 at $112,765.00. I Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. AWARD OF BID FOR STREET, CURB AND GUTTER WORK AT WEST 77rH STREET AND HIGHWAY 100 INTERCHANGE (BA-315) Member Housh asked that the award of bid for street, curb and gutter work at West 77th Street and the Highway 100 interchange be removed from the Consent Agenda for further information. Engineer Hoffman elaborated that the state asked the City to take the initiative in getting the signals installed at both ramps, replacing the Pentagon Park driveway, adding phasing on the signals, creating five lanes across 77th Street across the bridge, and widening of the southbound off ramp. Member Kelly made a motion for award of bid for street, curb, gutter construction for 77th Street and Highway 100 Interchange, State Aid Improvement Number 120-136-13, BA-315 for an approximate total of $1,767,322.60. Rollcalk Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. “BID AWARDED FOR RESTORATION AND PAINTING OF COMMUNITY CENTER WATER TOWER Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh for award of bid for restoration and painting of the Community Center water tower to recommended low bidder, Odland Protective Coatings, Inc., at $319,500.00. I Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. “HEARING DATE SET FOR SEPTEMBER 19, 2001, FOR VACATION OF PORTION OF SPRUCE ROAD Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-56 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION PORTION OF SPRUCE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 462.348, Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at 200 P.M. on the 19th day of September, 2001, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks in the Edina Sun-Current, the official newspaper of the City, to post such notice, in at least three public and conspicuous places, as provided in Minnesota Statutes. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA Page 3 I MinutesEdha City CounciVAugust 7,2001 4801 WEST 50m STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on September 19,2001, at 7:OO P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a public hearing for the proposed vacation of the following described portion of Spruce Road street right-of- may: All of the unimproved portion of Spruce Road as platted in Mendelssohn, north of and adjacent to Lot 10, Block 2, Mendelssohn, according to the recorded plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the registrar to titles, Hennepin County Minnesota. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. Adopted this 71h day of August, 2001. RIGHT-OF-WAY (SPRUCE ROAD) I Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-55, APPROVED FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Engineer Hoffman explained the City of Edina and the City of Minneapolis have been working to develop an improved traffic flow plan in the 50th & France area. The agreement includes physically connecting the Edina signal at Halifax and 50th Street to the Minneapolis system along France at West 49 v2, West 50th and West 51St Streets. The agreement allows Minneapolis to install their controller in the Edina system to improve east/west flow on West 50th Street The estimated cost for the project is $22,000.00. The funding for this would be derived from the traffic signal equipment maintenance budget in Public Works. A similar agreement exists for the three signals on France Avenue. Cooperative signal agreements such as this are common with the City and ˙ also the City and Hennepin county. Mr. Hoffman recommended the Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement Work on the project would be done in the fall of 2001. I Following a brief Council discussion, Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-55 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TRAF'FIC CONTROL SIGNAL BETWEEN Page 4 . '. , :' , .I_;. .' .. I I I Minutesfidina Citv CounciVAugust 7,2001 THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND THE CITY OF EDINA INVOLVING THE 50TH AND HALIFAX SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina and the City of Minneapolis have been working together to develop an improved traffic flow plan at the 50th Street and France Avenue area; and WHEREAS, the proposed plan would include physically connecting the Edina signal at Halifax Avenue and 50th Street to the Minneapolis system along France Avenue at West 49 */2, West 50th and West 5lSt Streets, allowing Minneapolis to install their controller in the Edina system improving the easvwest flow on West 50th Street; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina's estimated share of this proposed plan would be $22,000 to be derived from the Public Work's Traffic Signal Equipment Maintenance Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the proposed signal improvement is hereby authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to enter into an agreement with the City of Minneapolis to accomplish the mutually agreed upon improved traffic flow as previously stated. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. WATER REPORT UPDATE PRESENTED Engineer Hoffman introduced Assistant City Engineer Houle and Naeem Qureshi, from PCE, who will make presentations on Edina water. Assistant Engineer Houle explained a graphic depicting the individual well depths and aquifer formation for the City of Edina. He indicated the reasons why there is brown water: Unlined cast-iron watermains (from 1920 - 1970) Seasonal wells Watermain breaks Dead-end watermains Drawing from hydrants Directional flows in system change Turning watermain off/on Street sweeping operations Sewer cleaning operations Skating rinks Seasonal flushing Fires Water softener malfunctions No water softener Galvanized piping Low water consumption Internal problems Naeem Qureshi of PCE, explained that Edina residents are served by two water sources. Both meet all primary drinking water standards. 1. Mississippi water through the Minneapolis Water Works for the Morningside area of Edina is softened. 2. 18 groundwater wells and 4 iron removal plants for the balance of the City have in- house softening. 3. 83 contaminants tested to ensure compliance with primary standards. Page 5 MinutesEdina Citv CounciVAugust 7,2001 Primary Standard - Health Related Secondary Standard - Aesfietic CENTRALIZED WATER SYSTEMSERVES MANY CITIES Single Plant Saves Operational Costs Higher Well Collector Piping Costs Larger Mains From Plant to System Contamination in Well Field Can Be a Problem No Redundanq in Single Plant Several Sources of Water Smaller Mains Flow Pattern Change as New Sources Come Online Stains on Plumbing Fixtures Stains on Laundered Clothing Reduced System Disinfectant Residuals EDINA SYSTEM IS DECENTRALmD PROBLEMS CAUSED BY IRON/MANGANESE Disagreeable Tastes in Drinking Water Shields Micro-organisms in Distribution System SECONDARY STANDARDS ARE NOT HEALTH RELATED IRON 0.30 ppm MANGANESE 0.05 ppm 40% of raw water supplies exceed these standards Sequestering (Control) wifh Polyphosphate or Sodium Silicate Removal Seven have iron and manganese removal Eleven (seasonal) have no iron and manganese removal Varying dissolved iron High total dissolved solids Varying residence time Water from different directions (wells, flushing, main breaks, fires) Piperust REMEDY TREATMENT OPTIONS MOST OF EDINA RESIDENTS RELY ON 18 WELTS WELL SUPPLY QUALITY VARIES Several wells wifh no iron and manganese removal SOFTENING Removes iron, manganese and hardness Messy sludge disposal Cost prohibitive - scattered wells Most residents have in-home softening systems IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL AT WELLS Exceeding secondary standards Seasonal use - not cost ef€ective ADD POLYPHOSPHATE Already underway Reduced quality complaints Page 6 MinutesEdina Citv Council/Aumst 7,2001 TREATING ALL WELLS WILL NOT PRODUCE IMMEDIATE RESULTS Removing particulate matter in pipes takes a long time 0 Rusting of iron pipes will not be affected OVER 80% OF WATER MEETS SECONDARY STANDARDS FOR IRON AND MANGANESE Member Masica inquired whether the water that does not meet secondary standards comes from a common source. Mr. Qureshi said it depends upon which aquifer the water is coming from. Ms. Masica asked how often are pipes replaced. Mr. Houle said when roads are reconstructed, services are checked and upgraded if necessary. Mayor Maetzold asked if lining water pipes would be a solution. Assistant Engineer Houle said research on relining water pipes has not yet been done. Member Hovland commented that the report seems to have taken a cost conservative approach and he asked to what extent the polyphosphate treatment is working and can it be expanded. Mr. Houle gave an example of one well going down and brown water calls going up so its apparent the addition of polyphosphates is working. Mr. Qureshi explained the polyphosphates creates a thin film between the wall of the pipe and water therefore preventing the iron from entering the water system. He said there is a limit of how much polyphosphates can be added to the water. Mr. Hovland asked if polyphosphates are added to City wide water. Mr. Qureshi said where water is treated, polyphosphates are added. Mr. Hovland asked if Mr. Qureshi had experience with the lining of water pipes. Mr. Qureshi said not recently. Mr. Hovland asked about the residue from softening a water system. Mi. Qureshi explained home softening systems use an ion exchange system and that is not cost effective in a municipal system. To soften Edina's water, a lime system would be effective with the disposal of the lime sludge creating another problem. Member Housh asked for history of why Edina does not have a decentralized water system. Mr. Houle elaborated that most wells were installed from the 1930s to 1989 and were put in as the City grew. I Mr. Qureshi summarized if the City is concerned with improving the water quality, consideration could be given to the installation of a water plant to decrease the amount of untreated water going into the system. He further recommended that the City prioritize how the wells are brought into use. Wells with high iron/manganese should be the last to come on. A centralized plant would be very costly but one or two gravity type plants would be beneficial. Mr. Houle concluded that staff could, 1) survey the operation of the existing wells, and 2) study whether another treatment facility is feasible, and 3) install a Utility Data Collection System to monitor the wells and water towers. Mr. Maetzold inquired whether any lining of pipes is being considered. Mr. Houle said a test portion in east Edina is being considered. Mr. Hovland asked the cost of installing another treatment facility. Mr. Qureshi said the cost of the plant would be approximately $750,000.00 to treat one million gallons of water per day. Member Masica asked how many households wold be served by this facility. Mr. Qureshi estimated about 400 households. Member Housh asked if the iron/manganese levels are within the acceptable range. Mr. Qureshi said recently constructed water treatment plants were designed to meet 80% of the secondary Page 7 MinutesEdha Citv CounciVAugust - 7,2001 standards. Some cities treatment facilities are designed to meet 100% of the secondary standards. The EPA has not yet set standards for iron/manganese allowed in the water. Maurice Dixon, 6515 Gleason Court, explains he spends approximately $600.00 per year on bottled water and softening his water. He calculated that for the 400 homes that would be served by having another water treatment plant constructed, approximately $240,000.00 would be saved. He inquired whether the seasonal wells could be rotated to clean them up. He questioned if Edina's water quality affects home values. Mr. Dixon encouraged the City to go forward with building an additional water treatment plant. KeIsey Smith, 4801 West 44th Street, stated his water comes from St. Louis Park even though his address is Edina. He said he would like to be connected to Edina's water system if the new treatment facility is built. Mr. Housh asked staff to do a survey of other cities water treatment and softening systems and present the information at a future Council meeting. No Council action was taken. POLICE DEPARTMENT RENOVATION OVERVIEW PRESENTED Assistant Manager Anderson reported that the Phase I building audit and preIiminary floor plan for the proposed Police Depariment (library building) has been finished. He introduced David Kroos of the Boarman, Kroos and Vogel Group (BKV), architects on the project. Mr. Anderson explained that three weeks ago, ground was broken for the library/senior center on the Grandview Square site. Occupancy of that facility is scheduled for February, 2002. Numerous meetings have been held and floor plans examined thoroughly to see if the 'fit' is good. I Mi. Kroos, said he has been working with the City since 1996 when a needs assessment was done of City Hall, including the Police Department. In 1998 he was called back for a 'fit! plan for a police facility. BKV did a facility audit of all systems including necessary repairs, electrical, structural, sound, etc. that might impact the cost The building was built in 1967 and is in good repair with one problem, the mechanical system. The wide-open space of the existing building affords good possibilities for enclosed support and office spaces but wilI require additional mechanical work. The roof is adequate but some water damage on the brick walls need corrective actions. The largest challenge, in Mr. Kroos estimation is site parking. Mr. Kroos displayed a graphic of the building footprint explaining a more efficient use of the facility. Mr. Housh inquired about the exterior aesthetics of the building changing, especidy the windows. Mr. Kroos said various means of visual protection from 50th considered. Mr. Anderson said the process with the Police Station has been exciting and City Hall will begin soon. By December cost estimates should be in place should begin on the Police station in March. street are being the renovation of and construction Following a brief discussion, no formal Council action was taken. "PETITION RECEIVED REOUESTING SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT AT 5615 WOODCREST I DRIVE Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh acknowledging Page 8 MinutesBdina Citv CounciVAugust 7,2001 receipt of petition for sidewalk replacement from residents at 5615 Woodcrest Drive, and to refer the petition to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Motioncarried on rollcall vote - five ayes. SOUTHDALE CENTER CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED - MAGGIANO'S RESTAURANT LIOUOR LICENSE Assistant Manager Anderson explained a letter was received from the Christopher J. Cummins, General Manager of the Southdale Center, dated August 2, 2001, requesting that the language in Section 900.08 of the City Code be changed allowing Maggiano's to apply for a liquor license. Maggiano's is a Brinker International Restaurant and Brinker is the corporate owner of Macaroni Grill and Big Bowl. When the liquor ordinance was designed, only one license per corporate entity was allowed. Macaroni Grill and Big Bowl were grandfathered because they both existed before the adoption of the current code. The Council feared all Edina's licenses would be used up quickly by one corporate entity if the Code did not include specific language limiting licensees to one license. Mr. Cummins' letter requests an amendment to the Code allowing up to three licenses per corporate ownership. Member Kelly said his concerns have not changed regarding one company controlling a majority of Edina's on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses. He added that Maggiano's was the type of restaurant that should be in Edina. Therefore, he would consider granting a variance, but not amending the ordinance. Attorney Gilligan explained a liquor ordinance could not be granted a variance. The ordinance could be amended allowing a limited number of licenses under one corporate entity. Mayor Maetzold voiced his support of an ordinance amendment allowing no more than three licenses to be issued under one corporate entity. Member Masica asked if the Council wants to limit the number to three licenses under one corporate head since the City has nine unfilled licenses at present. Mr. Anderson said the opportunity exists to come back to the Council with a request for an additional license. Member Kelly made a motion directing staff to prepare an ordinance amendment for consideration at the next meeting allowing up to three licenses to one corporate owner or entitiy. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS Kelsey Smith, 4801 West 44th Street voiced concern that he was not included in the mailings regarding the traffic concerns in the Country Club area. He said it has come to his attention that approximately $20,000 of taxpayers money has been spent on consultants, etc. He asked what direction the Mayor, Council and City Manager are giving to the Country Club area residents and whether further study will be done. He elaborated that traffic patterns at the neighborhood level can not be dictated. Mayor Maetzold responded that traffic is a huge issue and solutions need to be found. The grass-roots effort was for the good of the neighborhood. The committee has not come before the Council with suggestions to c& traffic in the area. I - Mr. Houle said he believes a report from the committee will come before the Council. Other areas of the City are 'waiting in the wings' to alleviate traffic concerns in their neighborhoods as well. Page 9 MinutesEdha City Council/August 7,2001 Ms. Masica reiterated that the Country Club Committee's purpose was to develop a prototype situation that other neighborhoods could use to find a solution to the traffic problem. She said she believes ihe problem lies with not involving the surrounding communities early in the process. TONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 19, 2001, and consisting of 38 pages: General Fund $198,570.67; Communications Fund $10,935.91; Working Capital Fund $25,695.68; Construction Fund $216,003.88; Art Center Fund $8,665.12; Golf Dome Fund $2,155.46; Aquatic Center Fund $16,505.86; Golf Course Fund $28,786.11; Ice Arena Fund $22,637.05; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $23,073.39; Liquor Fund $150,933.88; Utility Fund $456,041.81; Storm Sewer Fund $39,165.58; HRA Fund $125,000.00; TOTAL $1,324,170.40; and the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 26,2001, and consisting of 40 pages: General Fund $339,797.79; CDBG $37.00; Communications Fund $1,160.07; Working Capital Fund $4,803.66; Construction Fund $2,374.89; Art Center Fund $12,337.67; Golf Dome Fund $918.99; Aquatic Center Fund $27,610.49; Golf Couse Fund $23,820.67; Ice Arena Fund $108.00; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $4,020.26; Liquor Fund $148,247.00; Utility Fund $29,918.36; Storm Sewer Fund $44.73; Payroll Fund $255,000.00; TOTAL $850,199.58; and the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 1, 2001, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $127,23833; Communications Fund $6,892.66; Working Capital Fund $4,309.30; Construction Fund $6,793.26; Art Center Fund $424.25; Aquatic Center Fund $2,939.59; Golf Course Fund $25,047.10; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $7,676.50; Liquor Fund $99,010.01; Utility Fund $22,676.54; Storm Sewer Fund $465.00; HRA Fund $100,000.00; TOTAL $403,473.04. I Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. BUDGET HEARING DATE SET Assistant Manager Anderson indicated a budget meeting had been held recently and a tentative calendar set. He suggested setting a budget hearing date for 5:OO P.M. September 11, 2001. An alternative date could be set for Wednesday September 19, 2001, previous to a regularly scheduled Council meeting. Member Hovland made a motion setting September 11,2001, as the budget hearing date at 500 P.M. in the Council Chambers. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 9:lO P.M. Page 10