Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-01-17 COUNCIL MEETINGs 9 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 17, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of January 3, 2012, Work Session of January 3, 2012, Work Session of January 5, 2012 and Work Session of January 9, 2012 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 01/05/2012, TOTAL $1,317,436.12; Pre -List Dated, And Pre -List Dated 01/12/2012 TOTAL $1,612,649.82; C. Resolution No. 2012 -16 Approving Grant With Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force for 2012 D. Request To Purchase —Two 2012 GMC Sierras — Police Department E. Request To Purchase — One 2013 Ford Police Interceptor — Police Department F. Request To Purchase — One 2012 Ford Explorer — Police Department G. Request To Purchase — One 2012 Chevrolet Traverse — Police Department H. Request To Purchase —Two Lucas Chest Compression Devices — Fire Department I. Request To Purchase —Ice Resurfacer— Braemar Ice Arena J. Resolution No. 2012 -20 Requesting MNDOT Funding For Tracy Avenue And TH62 Ramp Intersections K. Resolution No. 2012 -21 Requesting MNDOT Funding For France Avenue and TH62 Ramp Intersections L. Engineering Services For Bike Boulevard Improvement M. First Reading - Ordinance No. 2012 -03 Amending Section 905 Open House Parties N. Resolution No. 2012 -22 Approving Agreement No. 00354 Minnesota Department of Transportation — Bike Boulevard Project. i Agenda/Edina City Council January 17, 2012 Page 2 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvement No. BA -385, Resolution No. 2012 -18 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING: Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvement No. BA -388, Resolution No. 2012 -19 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2012 -17 Accepting Various Donations B. Award of Contract —Water Meter Replacement Project Contract No. PW12 -1 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS t f Tues Tues Mon Mon Mon Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues is .es Tues Tues Wed Agenda/Edina City Council January 17, 2012 Page 3 XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA -REGULAR MEETING OF, JANUARY 3, 2012 III. APPROVAL OF EXPANDED WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC AND CITY OF EIDNA IV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Jan 17 Work Session — Boards & Commissions Update Jan 17 Regular Meeting Jan 23 Board & Commission Interviews Feb 6 Joint Work Session - HRRC Feb 6 Regular Meeting Feb 7 PRECINCT CAUCUSES Feb 20 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Feb 21 Joint Work Session - EEC Feb 21 Regular Meeting Feb 28 Joint Work Session With Pln Comm & GrandView Str Com. Mar 6 Work Session - TBD Mar 6 Regular Meeting Mar 19 Annual Boards & Commissions Dinner Meeting Mar 20 Work Session — Sports Dome Report Mar 20 Regular Meeting Apr 3 Work Session — TDB Apr 3 Regular Meeting Apr 17 Work Session — TDB Apr 17 Regular Meeting Apr 23 Annual Volunteer Reception 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 -7:30 P.M. MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. HUGHES PV. CENTENNIAL LAKES 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M.BRAMAR RM WARREN HYDE CLUB HS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 3, 2012 7:05 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.D., Resolution No. 2012 -02, designating official newspaper for 2012; IV.M., Annual appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector, IV.O., 2012 bike routes recommendation; IV.P., Traffic Safety Committee report of December 7, 2011; and IV.S., Resolution No. 2012 -15 calling for public hearing for Centennial Lakes TIF District, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of December 20, 2011 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 22, 2011, and consisting of 36 pages; General Fund $295,331.55; CDBG Fund $82,000.00; Communications Fund $14,618.24; Police Special Revenue $104.80; Working Capital Fund $2,897.88; Art Center Fund $14,021.19; Golf Dome Fund $2,097.91; Aquatic Center Fund $9,840.61; Golf Course Fund $8,265.65; Ice Arena Fund $24,614.09; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $18,099.57; Liquor Fund $190,791.15; Utility Fund $478,125.61; Storm Sewer Fund $589.16; Recycling Fund $19.42; PSTF Agency Fund $1,469.54; TOTAL $1.142.886.37 and for approval of payment of claims dated December 29, 2011, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $85,569.17; Communications Fund $10,852.87; Police Special Revenue $35,246.63; Working Capital Fund $232,262.46; Equipment Replacement Fund $14,110.03; Construction Fund $62,783.32; Art Center Fund $3,157.59; Golf Dome Fund $47.36; Aquatic Center Fund $42.99; Golf Course Fund $2,117.10; Ice Arena Fund $5,625.29; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $9,467.80; Liquor Fund $248,620.38; Utility Fund $406,400.53; Storm Sewer Fund $75,772.43; Recycling Fund $32.72; PSTF Agency Fund $5,183.58; TOTAL $1,197.292.25: and, Credit Card Transactions dated October 26 —November 26, 2011; TOTAL 57.584.33. IV.C. Approve re- appointment of Mayor Pro Tem 1410 ReSAlat iAn Ne �n� n� a a:...... #:.:..:., s... 203 IV.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -03, signatory resolution IV.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -04, designation of Director /Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -05, designation of Director /Alternate Director of LOGIS IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -06, authorizing facsimile signatures IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -07, designating official depositories IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -08, appointment to Edina Fire Relief Board Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 IVX Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -09, approving Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) Conditional Use License Agreement IV.L. Approve setting 2012 date for Board of Appeal & Equalization A-4-A& Ann-Mal appointment of Assistant I-A-le-e-d- Inspede IV.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -12, setting February 21, 2012, public hearing for Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -368 V A 9012 L.ILe . ute- resemmendiation IV. P. T.a ffiG Safety Committee .e e.a e f 19ese.. be. 7 9011 IV.Q. Approve engineering services for 50th and France streetscapes IV.R. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -14 delinquent utilities certificate corrections 14A S. Res..l..rr:..n Ala 9019.15 Gal 1aRg ie.... 13 G heaFaRg ie. CeAte. Real 1 aloes TI[ Dist -Fe A Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA W.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -02 ADOPTED —DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2012 The Council agreed to revisit the issue of whether the Edina Sun Current was delivered to apartments and townhomes. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -02, designating official newspaper. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. W.M. ANNUAL APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPROVED The Council discussed appointment of the Assistant Weed Inspector. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving annual appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. W.O. 2012 BIKE ROUTE RECOMMENDATION ACCEPTED Assistant Engineer Sullivan indicated staff supported the ETC recommendation. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to accept 2012 bike route recommendation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.P. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 2011 ACCEPTED Mr. Sullivan responded to the Council's questions relating to the recommendations of the Traffic Safety Committee. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to accept the Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 7, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.S. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-15 ADOPTED — CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES TIF DISTRICT Mayor Hovland requested the Council reschedule the public hearing to February 21, 2012, because he would be out of state on February 6, 2012. Mayor Hovland introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -15, calling for public hearing by the City Council on the proposed adoption of a modification to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and the proposed adoption of a modification to the tax increment financing plan for Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 District, a redevelopment district, as amended to schedule the public hearing on February 21, 2012. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD - Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. VIKING HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -386 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10 ADOPTED Mr. Sullivan explained the City's schedule for road inspection and how the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was determined based on visual inspection of the pavement condition plus other factors. The PCI ranked streets with zero being in the worst condition and 100 being in the best condition. By using this method, the City created a schedule that assured streets in the poorest condition were reconstructed first and CIP dollars were appropriately allocated towards reconstruction and maintenance with the goal of minimizing long -term expenses for the City while maintaining a high quality of pavement. Mr. Sullivan presented the feasibility study for the staff - initiated Viking Hills Street Reconstruction Improvement. He identified the project area, described existing conditions, and the proposed improvement to streets, spot repair to utilities, and upgrade of fire hydrants. It was noted the Council received a petition from Glacier Place residents requesting removal from this project. Mr. Sullivan indicated staff had not proposed to install sidewalks. He clarified there would be individual assessments for each of the five roadway projects. The estimated road projects' cost was as follows: Arctic Way $342,000, Glacier Place $70,000, Gleason Court $175,000, Polar Circle $73,000, and Vernon Court and Vernon Hills Court $157,000. Utility work would be funded through the respective utility funds. A single - family home would be assessed for one Residential Equivalent Unit (REU). The preliminary estimated assessments were as follows: Arctic Way at $7,600; Glacier Place at $7,000; Gleason Court twin homes at $6,250 per side; Polar Circle at $8,112.11; Vernon Court and Vernon Hills Court at $4,815.95 and $7,705.52 for the townhomes (depending on density) and $9,631.909 for the one single - family home. Mr. Sullivan presented the project schedule and indicated staff recommended authorization to complete plans and specifications and take bids if the Council found this project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible. The Council discussed the proposed project and PCI for the five roads proposed for reconstruction. Mr. Sullivan indicated that one side of Vernon Hills Road was State owned right -of -way and not proposed to be assessed because Statute 429 required proof of benefit and the City's assessment Policy was tied to access. In this case, the Mn /DOT right -of -way had no access to the roadway, so it would not receive benefit. With regard to how REUs were calculated for twinhomes, Mr. Sullivan explained the current policy does not have a lot of language on multiple dwelling units. Therefore, staff referred to the State Aid Policy regarding multi - family dwellings to base REUs and determined that since a townhome typically generates fewer trips than a single - family dwelling, a charge of .8 REUs was the appropriate assessment per the twin -home development. Staff determined the five townhome units on the west end would fit into the condominium category and proposed an assessment of .5 per REU. Mr. Sullivan explained the analysis and finding of ITE engineers that single - family homes generated ten trips daily compared to twin homes which generated eight trips daily. That analysis was used to determine the number of REUs to assess per twin -home and townhome. The Council indicated that twin -homes and Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3, 2012 townhomes should be treated equally and this issue should be reviewed between now and the assessment hearing. To address drainage, Mr. Sullivan indicated staff recommended installing boulevard sump pump drain tile to which residents could redirect storm drainage from their property. It was noted the Police Department had been informed about the traffic issues on Vernon Avenue, which were considered to be related to driver compliance. Mr. Sullivan addressed the funding for road projects and benefit of curb and gutter to improve drainage and extend pavement life. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Public Testimony Gary Hoch, 6610 Vernon Hills Road, addressed the Council. Bill Peters, 6650 Vernon Hills Road, addressed the Council. Brent Reichert, 6416 Glacier Place, addressed the Council. Charles Hanna, 6510 Gleason Court, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Sullivan addressed the issues raised during public testimony and answered questions of the Council. He explained the four payment methods for assessments as well as the City's methodology to determine whether the property received benefit and could be assessed. Mr. Sullivan described the resident notification process and apologized that the December letters were confusing. The Council asked for staff's analysis on why a particular road had a poor PCI at 18 years. Mr. Sullivan described staff's analysis from the aerial photos and explained that a different aggregate standard was used for the sub -base than today's standard for road construction. In addition, the street was constructed in 1981, had been capped with two inches of blacktop, and used by construction vehicles while the neighborhood was built. The two inches of blacktop lasted from 1981 till the present, but would not be adequate into the future. Staff acknowledged that the estimates contained some contingency dollars that if not used would result in a lower amount assessed. Mr. Sullivan indicated staff would review bids to assure a qualified competent contractor, adequate construction methods, and costs that were at or below estimates. Manager Neal explained projects were financed with GO Bonds and Edina, as an AAA rated City, received the lowest possible interest rates the market allowed, currently in two percent range. He noted the increment between the City's interest rate and assessment interest charged was set by Council action. The Council discussed methods to fund road projects and explained the City had gone before the Legislature to establish a street utility; however, that process was not approved. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -10, receiving feasibility study and ordering improvement for Viking Hills Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -386. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 Motion carried. The Council directed staff to address the definition of townhomes /twinhomes in the City's assessment policy before the special assessment hearing that will be held after the project has been constructed. The REU language should be clearly stated so residents know how their housing has been defined. The Council asked staff to assure that letters sent to residents were accurate, clear, explained rationale and if a revision became necessary, the notice clearly stated it was a revision to avoid future confusion. VI.B. VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION NO. BA -387 —RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -11 ADOPTED Mr. Sullivan presented the feasibility study for the staff - initiated Valley Estates Street Reconstruction Improvement. He indicated a large percentage of the neighborhood had signed a petition asking that the project not move forward. Mr. Sullivan identified the project area, described existing drainage and road conditions, proposed improvement to streets, and spot repair to concrete curb and gutter. He described the location of a proposed sidewalk segment as requested by the School District and Edina Transportation Commission (ETC). The project also included sanitary sewer spot repairs, modifications to storm sewer, and upgrade of fire hydrants. Mr. Sullivan indicated the preliminary street project cost was estimated at $760,000 with the City paying $290,000 for improvements to the sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer. Each single - family home would be assessed for one REU in the amount of $9,000, with the School District paying five REUs in the amount of $45,000 for its soccer fields. Mr. Sullivan presented the project schedule. Mr. Sullivan stated residents had raised the question whether the soccer field parking lot was large enough, so a separate questionnaire had been sent to ask residents whether it was a problem and what they would recommend. Since responses were varied, staff recommended moving forward with the project as presented, and if parking becomes a problem it could be addressed by the Traffic Safety Committee. Staff recommended authorization to complete plans and specifications and take bids if the Council found this project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible. Mr. Sullivan answered questions of the Council related to the proposed sidewalk location and recommendation to remove asphalt from the "stub" street at the east end of Creek Valley Road and replace it with an environmentally friendly surface that could accommodate maintenance and emergency vehicles. He indicated staff had discussed whether the sidewalk should extend and connect to the trail and could work with the School District on whether to extend the sidewalk to the east. The ETC recommended the sidewalk segment on Nordic Circle, and staff found that to be a good starting point. Mr. Sullivan explained that the ETC reviewed the feasibility prior to Council but after the neighborhood meetings, so residents might not yet be aware of the sidewalk issue. The Council noted the average PCI for the subject streets was 29, indicating the pavement condition was poor enough to be reconstructed. The Council referenced resident letters indicating there was no problem with the condition of the roadway and asked whether drainage could be addressed without full reconstruction. Mr. Sullivan stated his opinion that it would be difficult to make drainage improvements beneficial to the neighborhood without major impacts to the pavement surface in certain locations. He indicated the overall neighborhood's PCI was low enough to warrant all roads reconstruction. Staff recommended approval to get the best price based on economy of scale, disturb the neighborhood only once, complete the project before schools starts in 2012, and not be back for 40 years. The Council acknowledged that resident input on the parking issue varied because it appeared to be an episodic issue related to field use when vehicles were parked on the streets not in the parking lot. The Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3, 2012 Council asked staff to work with the School District, Park and Recreation Department, and Soccer Association to address parent education on the need to use the parking lot during games to reduce the impact to the neighborhood and increase the safety of players. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:17 p.m. Public Testimony Mike Slaughter, 6625 Nordic Drive, addressed the Council. Dan Ballard, 6517 Nordic Drive, addressed the Council. Carol Korupp, 6200 Creek Valley Road, addressed the Council. Peter Schnorbach, 6221 Balder Lane, addressed the Council. Garry Woessner, 6602 Scandia Road, addressed the Council. Terry Korupp, 6200 Creek Valley Road, addressed the Council. Jerry Edwards, 6513 Nordic Drive, addressed the Council. Dawei Tian, 6220 Boulder Lane, addressed the Council. Stacey Eidsvold, 6209 Balder Lane, addressed the Council. Michelle Tressel, 6620 Scandia Road, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Sullivan and Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle addressed the issues raised during public testimony and answered questions of the Council related to the need for this project based on the PCI ranking and rate of deterioration once pavement became cracked and brittle, resulting in creation of potholes and undermining of the subgrade. With regard to sidewalks, Mr. Houle recommended inclusion of a bid alternate and allowing staff to obtain additional input from the School District and residents. Mr. Sullivan indicated there was general consensus on the need to address back yard drainage. He explained the City could construct a storm sewer network at the curb that would residents to redirect storm drainage from their lots into the City's system mitigating some of the area's drainage issues. Mr. Sullivan explained that due to topography this would not be a solution for all properties in this neighborhood. The Council asked staff to also inform residents of possible grant opportunities through the Nine Mile Watershed District. The Council addressed the number of RELIs assigned to the School District and asked whether the School District could be assessed more RELls based on additional information received relating to the high level of field and parking lot usage. Attorney Knutson advised this issue could be addressed between now and the final assessment hearing. The Council asked that residents be provided with the Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 feasibility study and project area map depicting the PCI. Mr. Sullivan displayed the information and advised it was available at the engineering department and the City's website. The Council discussed the sidewalk issue. Mr. Sullivan explained he had attended a meeting with Creek Valley Elementary staff to discuss the issue of pedestrians walking north of Gleason Road trying to find the least obstructed path to the school away from vehicle traffic turning on and off of Gleason. Mr. Sullivan indicated the sidewalk segment recommended by the ETC was not part of the Comprehensive Plan but staff was concurrent that it would lend a safe alternate route for bicycles and pedestrians. It was acknowledged that the resident input process related to sidewalks could be improved. The Council indicated the purpose of the sidewalk was to facilitate walking and asked staff how the City could assure it was not used to facilitate bus loading and unloading. Mr. Neal indicated signage could be installed. He suggested staff raise the issues of the soccer fields, parking, school buses, and sidewalk /trail maintenance at its quarterly meetings with the School District. The Council indicated that a visual inspection by a lay person was not a reliable source to determine whether the road needed reconstruction. The Council reiterated the City's commitment was to providing sound public infrastructure. The Council stated it was committed to being a good steward of City funds and if roads were allowed to deteriorated too far, that could result in a more expensive reconstruction projects. The Council encouraged residents continue voicing their opinions and concerns by attending meetings or submitting petitions. The Council cautioned that listening to input does not mean the Council and residents would always agree because the Council had an obligation to the City as a whole and not just one neighborhood. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -11, receiving feasibility study and ordering improvement for Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -387. Member Bennett seconded the motion. The Council indicated the decision on the funding allocation of sidewalks would be made at a later date pending additional input and directed staff to re- examine the REUs assigned to the School District. Member Brindle stated her intention to vote against the motion because she thought the roadway looked fine. She said she was not bothered by the appearance of a "patchwork" pavement if that would extend the life of the roadway. Member Brindle indicated she understood there would be continued pavement degradation so the reconstruction would be needed at some point but she would not support it until it was absolutely necessary. The Council indicated it needed to rely on the recommendation of professional engineers and make decisions based on the best interest of Edina. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Brindle Motion carried. VI.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -13 ADOPTED — APPROVING A PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT AT 7777 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH FOR XCEL ENERGY Planning Director Teague presented the request of Xcel Energy for preliminary and final plat approval for property located at 7777, 7801, 7807, and 7815 Washington Avenue South. The proposed plat was located in both Edina and Bloomington with only one lot located in the Edina. The requested plat would create a reconfigured lot in Bloomington where Xcel Energy proposed to build a new electric sub - station. Staff and the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat subject to findings as identified in the draft resolution. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:16 p.m. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 Public Testimony No one appeared to testify. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -13, approving a Preliminary and Final Plat for 7777 Washington Avenue South, based on the following findings: 1. The existing property located within the City of Edina would not be impacted. 2. The existing building and associated parking areas would now be located on the same lot. And subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat approval by the City of Bloomington. 2. All necessary approvals must be obtained from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. t VI.D. ORDINANCE NO. 2012-01 ADOPTED —REGARDING REVISIONS TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN Mr. Teague presented the draft ordinance defining when changes might be made to approved site plans that were not yet built. He explained the Code did not clearly define "minor changes" so it was always brought before the Council. If approved, the amendment would allow staff to approve, on a one -time basis, a minor change if the proposed change met five criteria: there was no increase to the proposed number of dwelling units; the change would not increase the floor area of structures on site by more than 5% of the gross floor area; the change would comply with Code requirements; the change could not change any condition required on a site plan; and, the property was not located within the Edina Heritage Landmark District. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval at its December 14, 2011, meeting. The Council acknowledged that multiple changes could be considered under an administrative approval as long as none exceeded the criteria. The Council discussed whether the criteria should include a square footage threshold, such as 10,000 sq. ft., in addition to the 5% limitation. It also discussed whether the language should include "Edina Heritage landmark" as well as "Edina Heritage Landmark District" since a landmark might not be residential. Mr. Teague indicated this method of approval only involved a project with a site plan, such as a PUD. It would not apply to a CUP. The Council considered whether it was necessary to include both a square footage threshold and percentage threshold and whether the square footage threshold would be considered arbitrary. S ppeFt was eXpFessed for the erdi.,.,nce as a nted b,,,,. use the use Member Bennett stated support to include language indicating: "...5% or exceed 10,000 sq. ft., whichever is less," noting the percentage in larger -sized projects could be substantial and result in a substantial impact. It was acknowledged that the language applied to the process by which a change could be made, allowing an administrative approval rather than a Planning Commission /City Council process that included public input. AttOFney Knutson .,, ted- the r-,,,,.,,.ik artien to appFeve a site plan .pFebably included cenditiens (i.e., limit en height) and- t-We ef the ffiteFia fer ad-Ministrative appF9val U „s +h.,+ Rdit;AP-; .,.,.,F, val ,dd nAt h,nge Attorney Knutson stated that conditions of approval could not change, and that if a specified height was made a condition of approval, it could not change. Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 Mr. Teague expounded on the discussion of the Planning Commission and advised that "gross floor area" meant all square footage within the building and not just the floor plate. Member Bennett referenced past Planning Commission meeting minutes and indicated she felt the Planning Commission had done a deliberative job of bringing this forward and the conversation tonight seemed to be a disagreement in interpretation of the Planning Commission's recommendation. The Council discussed the ordinance language and acknowledged that Edina was already very conservative in giving approval authority to staff. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:42 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion to grant First Reading and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2012 -01, amending the Zoning Ordinance concerning revisions to approved site plans. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VI.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2012-02 ADOPTED —REGARDING THE REGULATION OF UTILITY EQUIPMENT Mr. Teague presented the draft ordinance regulating utility /mechanical equipment. He explained this ordinance amendment was drafted as a result of the 100 square foot, 12 -foot tall air conditioning unit installed at York Gardens within the required setback. Mr. Teague explained the changes to the ordinance and described the Planning Commission's deliberation in determining the 36 sq. ft. threshold at its December 14, 2011, meeting. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:48 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague made a motion to grant First Reading and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2012 -02, amendment concerning the regulation of utility equipment. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council discussed the R -1 setback requirement for this equipment was five feet and that a permanently installed generator might raise the same concerns. Members Sprague and Swenson accepted a friendly amendment to amend Ordinance No. 2012 -02 to add "and other privately owned mechanical equipment in the R -1 and R -2 District." Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 3. 2012 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT Ralph Campbell, 6700 Point Drive, thanked the Council for its public service and the West 70th Street improvement project that created a higher level of safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. Steve Willett, 5705 Kemrich Drive, expressed his concern related to integrity of public officials. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-01 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -01 accepting various donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS— Received XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 17, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 3, 2012, meeting available. Page 10 W MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 3, 2012 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Members of the Park Board in attendance included Park Board Members: Deeds, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Neville, Peterson, Steele, Weicht, and Chair Hulbert. EDINBOROUGH STUDY PRESENTATION Jeff King, Ballard & King, introduced his firm and explained its role to complete a market analysis, program assessment, and operational feasibility of Edinborough Park. The role of ATS &R was to complete a facility assessment, concept plan, and cost estimates. Mr. King provided a PowerPoint presentation that included the following: identifying the 20 -mile radius service area driven by location of current customers of Edinborough Park; demographic characteristics within the service area; Spending Potential Index (SPI) and market conditions; and alternative service providers. Mr. King indicated they found less 4% f9UF peFeent of admissions received at Edinborough Park were derived from the fitness component due to limited space, low diversity of equipment, no group exercise option, and lack of locker space and child watch. The desire for fitness facilities remains strong but for the City to pursue and compete in that market, it would require a significant outlay of 5 -7,000 sq. ft. Mr. King added there was no assurance the City would be successful if they pursued an update to Edinborough' s fitness facilities, in part because of the public perception of Edinborough Park as a place for youngsters to play, and not as a premiere fitness center. In addition, a mixed audience of kids and adults does not always work well and there was a strong and significant local competition in the fitness market. Mr. King indicated Edinborough's lap pool was one dimensional, lacked water depth for competition swimming and had inadequate support spaces such as locker rooms and seating. About 19% of the City's population participated in swimming; however, Ballard and King's analysis indicated about 4% was actually interested in t-he swimming for exercise and competition conventienal peel layeut. He advised that market appeal would require a change in format to a leisure pool incorporating lap lanes, water slide, lazy river and zero depth entry. This , uld- -h„ the kind of faeility EdiA1,.,FeUgh . WId ., „a W h,,..,,..,e t„ be GIBFRpetiltiVe. Mr. King said it was questionable whether such an operation could fit into the existing site or generate enough revenue to offset operating costs. Mr. King indicated the pool facility was under performing and underutilized. He pointed out that operating without life guards could be a liability issue Mr. King stated they looked at Adventure Peak as the identifying moniker for Edinborough Park and Edina, and the reason the service area was a 20 -mile radius. They found Adventure Peak had been the driver to generate revenue, was heavily utilized and hosted over 1,300 birthday parties last year. Mr. King suggested the City may need to keep reinvesting in Adventure Peak to keep it performing, since other entities in the area would attempting to emulate the City's success through duplication. Mr. King noted there was a conflict of use with the theater area due to noise from Adventure Peak. He stated the theater was under utilized over the course of the week, primarily due to lack of support space for seating, storage and acoustics. Tammy Magney, ATS &R, indicated the building was in good condition, and ATS & R would recommend the City complete the CIP projects to maintain this first class facility. She presented their recommendation to Page 1 OV Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /January 3. 2012 provide program improvements through a phased plan. Phase 1 included a project to infill the pool and create a soft play area and party rooms in that space; modify the lower level locker rooms for family restroom and coats; and modify the upper level restrooms for unisex restrooms and storage. Phase 2 included modification of the track for offices, meeting rooms and a picnic deck. Phase 3 included creating a challenge course to increase options for older kids. Phase 4 included a project that would infill the lower area grotto to provide three or more interactive play areas and interactive tech zones on the amphitheater floor. Ms. Magney presented the proposed energy efficiency projects, an option to reduce the planting areas by two - thirds which would reduce labor and lighting costs, and described each of the four phases in detail. Bill Martin, ATS &R, described the proposed CIP and energy improvements and referenced the written report's appendixes that contained cost estimates. Mr. King clarified that all options would have a positive impact on the operating budget over the long term. Member Bennett noted the Council had previously discussed its intention to look at everything, even the sale of the building; however, the report only examined current uses and analyzed future uses confined to expanded kid options. She noted the study indicated that during a three -month period, only 6.5% of the birthday parties were scheduled by Edina residents. Mr. King indicated that was correct, as reflective of having a 20 -mile service radius. Member Bennett stated it appeared to be a tax subsidized birthday party facility. If serving an aFea ',primarily users outside Edina, she felt Edinborough should be self- sustaining. Member Bennett stated she was disappointed the study did not include a broader analysis with more ideas. Mr. King indicated the study provided tools to help the Council with its decision making process. Member Bennett stated she had not found any information in this analysis whether competitors in the area would or would not undertake renovations and asked if that would impact projections. Mr. King answered it would not impact projections because they had been very conservative with the birthday party element. He explained that expanding beFthday paFties by 0 year-. Mr. King urged the Council not to overlook that this facility was a contributor to the overall economic health of the community because the people coming to Edinborough Park, in many cases, make additional purchases. Member Swenson noted the City currently gave a considerable amount of money to this facility and asked whether the proposed improvements would create additional revenue to cover the City's contribution. Mr. King answered that the soft play option would have a positive cash flow of almost $144,000 towards operations. Across the board, all three options would generate more revenue for the operations and less reliance on General Fund support. Mr. King indicated that debt service was not part of the calculations at this point. Member Swenson asked about the City's contractual obligation to the condo association and hotel with the pool and track. Edinborough Park Manager Kattreh advised it could potentially be $200,000, and it was staffs intention to ask the City Attorney to look into that question. Member Brindle reviewed the student enrollment estimates of the School District. Mr. King indicated the age group distribution would contribute to and not decrease revenues. With regard to fitness, Mr. King indicated it was not a passing fad but had become a way of life. He explained types of sports fluctuate over time, but there had been a movement from team sports to individual activities. Member Brindle advocated retaining the amphitheater because it was the only activity that brought in adults. She suggested the challenge course not be extended above the stage to assure there was no impact to lighting or acoustics. Member Brindle noted this facility, which opened in 1987, had evolved over time, and the storage rooms were originally green rooms for performers. With regard to the grand piano, she supported either selling it or donating it to the Senior Center. Member Brindle noted the value of Page 2 e Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /January 3. 2012 Edinborough Park to the residents at Edina Park Plaza could change if this became more of a teen and younger park. She pointed out that use of the amphitheater was held to certain times based on resident request, so adding a tech feature in the grotto may create noise concerns. Member Brindle stated the Park needed to be of value to Edina Park Plaza residents since part of their rent goes to the Park. Mr. King added that economic conditions had also changed over time, noting that a fee for use was not charged when the Park first opened. Park Board Chairman Hulbert asked about the impact to parking should more areas be changed to facilities that increase density by attracting more children and young teens. Ms. Kattreh explained that the lower level of the parking ramp was not used on the weekend by the Corporate Center, so she recommended asking the Corporate Center to use that space over the weekends. Mr. Hulbert asked if there was an estimate on the number of vehicles /parking spaces needed to accommodate higher densities. Mr. King stated the City's parking ratio would give guidance for parking stall requirements. From a programming perspective, they tried to expand the core business and looked at components of interest to the "tween" population to spread out the concentration at Adventure Peak. Mayor Hovland asked whether constructing all three phases would offset existing losses. Mr. King answered that all three options would increase expenditures by $212,000, and create additional revenues of $350,000, a difference of $135,000. Park Board Member Deeds presented his estimate that Phase 1 would result in a 6.7% return on investment and if borrowing, Phase 1 improvements would cover debt load but result in only a 2.5% return on investment annually. Mr. Deeds agreed the primary usage was for children 8- year -olds and under and indicated he was amazed that Ms. Kattreh was able to schedule so many birthday parties. He indicated the proposed improvements would not get Edinborough Park to a break even point but would close the gap somewhat and make for better utilization and overall utility benefit to having this type of facility in the community. Mr. Deeds stated he was skeptical the proposed uses would attract 10- to 14- year -olds to the facility but thought the potential to grow revenues through birthday parties and optimizing activities for under 10- year -olds was where the City could maximize financial returns on the building. He noted that the $200,000 from the condo association was important and if that income went away, none of the proposed improvements made sense. Member Sprague agreed that risk had not been factored into the analysis and asked how many functionally obsolete facilities had been analyzed. Mr. King indicated Ballard & King had completed over 500 feasibility studies across the country and about 125 facilities were in operation. He noted they were not architects, so not every project the firm analyzed was built. Mr. King indicated Edinborough Park was a very unique facility in the marketplace of the entire country and the study incorporated realistic expenses and conservative revenue projections. Member Sprague questioned whether Edinborough Park was unique because no other "adventure" uses had survived because it was not financially feasible. He indicated he recognized the uniqueness of Edinborough Park but questioned whether the operations were sustainable. Mr. Deeds stated he thought the numbers were conservative but would like the consultant to provide the assumptions used for traffic, usage growth and best /worst than expected range. He noted the facility was currently marketed by word of mouth and a marketing budget was not included. Park Board Member Jones suggested what makes this Park unique was the large organic presence in the middle of the winter. She noted there were other soft play areas, but the organic presence was what caused people to drive 20 miles to Edinborough Park. Ms. Jones stated she had also hoped the study would Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /January 3. 2012 include all options and asked whether Edinborough tenants were surveyed on what they may want for expansion of services or different services they would be willing to pay for. Ms. Kattreh indicated 600 respondents were surveyed a year ago for a four -month period and a lot of the items the consultants have provided were what the customers were looking for in terms of concessions and soft play specifically for toddlers. It was noted that Edina Park Plaza tenants, hotel and business owners were not surveyed. Member Bennett stated it seemed that what was unique about Edinborough Park was not the kid play space because there were similar offerings by other providers but, rather, the distinguished setting in which this function was set. However, once the phases were built out, there would not be much left of what makes Edinborough Park unique. She expressed concern that the report text does not recommend the theater remain due to conflict of uses. She said that expanding children's play usage into the entire facility would make most other uses incompatible. Member Bennett stated she would like to know what it would cost to operate the facility as a park without the fitness facility and pool. Member Swenson explained the decision had been made to approve Adventure Peak because Edinborough Park was losing money. Mayor Hovland confirmed that was the case so it was decided to invest $250,000 into Adventure Peak, which worked since the original investment was recouped in eight months. Mr. Deeds noted the pool and fitness areas were poorly designed and underutilized, so it was not a matter of losing space that people were making use of today. The options would be to either redevelop those areas or shut down the pool and fitness areas and run Edinborough Park as an open park facility. Member Brindle indicated she had additional questions related to whether Edinborough Park should be an enterprise facility, become a City park or were other options available. In addition the Council must address how important each aspect of Edinborough Park was to Edina being Edina. Member Sprague requested information on new construction options. He noted the Grandview Report included a community center so analysis was needed on whether to move this function and avoid expensive capital improvements. He asked whether the money should be put into a new facility where improvements could be made at a lower cost than to retrofit an older space. Park Board Member Lough stated many good questions were posed tonight and suggested those answers be received prior to the next joint work session. The Council agreed this decision necessitated additional discussion and study. Council consensus was reached to schedule a joint meeting with the Park Board to discuss this information and give opportunity to ask more questions. Mr. Neal indicated the Council was booked for commitments through the end of February, so a joint work session would not occur until March. This timing would give staff sufficient time to work with the consultants and possibly bring in other resources to answer the questions posed tonight. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:23 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 17, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 3, 2012, meeting available. Page 4 A. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY",,, 2012 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall :were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending When persons were being interviewed for their, respective boards 'or commissions were:; Floyd Grabiel Planning Commission Chair; Diane PlunkettLatham,.Energy and Environment Commission Chair; and Jennifer Janovy, Edina Transportation Commission Chair. Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, and Debra Mangen, City Clerk, were also in attendance. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to interview applicants for appointment to the various City Council Advisory Boards, Committees and Commissions. The following candidates for appointment were interviewed: Jennifer Christiaansen, David Davision, William F. Donnelly, Wayne Dvorak, Ron Erhardt, Daniel Gieseke, William Glahn, Tom La Force, Karen' Lanz, Courtney Whited, Kathryn Peterson, Kip Peterson and Michael Schroeder Following the interviews, the Council deliberated briefly. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen,.City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 17, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 - Council Check Register Page - 1 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 354987 11512012 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 210.00 ANNUAL DUES 278861 2012 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 210.00 354988 11512012 100613 AAA 43.75 TAB RENEWAL 278607 122911 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.75 354989 1/5/2012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 617.66 UB TEMP 278588 34563985 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 617.66 354990 11512012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 115.00 278426 580209 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING _ 95.60 278427 - 0816100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 108.05 278640 0816142 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 38.00 278802 0816139 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 356.65 354991 1/512012 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 60.79 PIPE: 00001440 278608 122428 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 60.79 364992 116/2012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 81.53 COFFEE CUP LIDS 278705 20409 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 81.53 354993 11612012 129795 ALAMI,,MIMI 41.60 ART WORK SOLD 278793 123011 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.60 . 354994 11612012 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 168.04 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 278706 110906 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK .168.04 354995 1/5/2012 102715,: ALLEGRA EDINA 196.60 PARK PRESS EVENTS 278707 90909 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 196.60 354996 11512012 103285 AMEM - 100.00 ANNUAL DUES 278862 2012 -00421 1460.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CIVILIAN DEFENSE 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 114/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 2 i. 1/5/2012 — 1/5/2012 i Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364997 11512012 129836 <- AMERICAN.CERAMIC SOCIETY 903.60 POTTERY BOOKS �" 278601 CP992493 -3 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 903.60 354998 11512012 102470 - AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN'..- 4,390.00: PREMIUM 278863 6100000132325 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,390.00 364999 11512012 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 424.37 CONCESSION PRODUCT 278708 1667442 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 437.72 CONCESSION PRODUCT 278709 1668457 '5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 360.83 CONCESSION PRODUCT 00002039 278729 1668725 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,222.92 355000 11512012 101566 APPRAISAL INSTITUTE .. 330.00 DUES 278864 85749 -2012 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 330.00 355001 11512012 103191 ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ' 15.00 DUES - TOM HORWATH 278865 849 -000- 1779/20 1640.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 12 15.00 • 355002 11512012 129829 ARC-MATE MANUFACTURING CORP. 461.78 GARBAGE PICKERS 00001302 278374 INVO03947 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 461.78 355003 11612012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 331.00 CONSTRUCTION DUMPSTER 278730 1136498 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER i 331.00 355004 11512012 119465 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNT 319.00 2012 DUES 278866 33651 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 319.00 355005 11512012 102660 AUDUBON INTERNATIONAL 200.00 DUES - BOB ATOL 278867 GC539012012 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 200.00 355006 115/2012 120995 AVR INC. - 800.23 READY MIX 278731 55814 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 115/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 800.23 356007 11612012 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 1,410.29 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 278732 3652 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 235.02 PUSH BUMPER 278733 3649 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,645.31 356008 11612012 100638 BACHMAN'S 150.81 TREE TOPS 00006403 278589 10260660 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 150.81 355009 11512012 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 1,633.63 RUBBER MATTING 00002014 278734 00087234 1,633.63 355010 11512012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 39.55 278428 71475300 1,277.58 278429 71475200 140.05 278430 71475400 480.17 278431 71491400 456.46 278432 71491300 1,654.50 278433 71475500 30.00- 278434 71389300 52.00 278435 86186100 285.90 278435 86186100 101.82 278436 86186000 113.00 278436 86186000 133.54 278437 86185900 64.70 278803 71566200 226.20 278804 71614300 20.50 278805 71614400 1,030.35 278806 71566100 650.70 278807 71601400 226.70 278808 86218900 124.60 278809 86208700 135.64 278810 86218800 7,183.96 355011 11512012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 131.97 BINDERS 278710 WO- 741924 -1 80.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 278711 WO- 742649 -1 16.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 278712 WO- 742715 -1 5630.6406 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5862.5513 5842.5512 5860.6406 5862.5515 5822.5515 5822.6406 5842.5515 5822.5512 5822.5513 5862.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5515 5842.5515 5822.5515 1550.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page- 3 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 712.79 CITY OF EDINA 355012 Council Check Register 129832 BOILER SERVICES INC. 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 346.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 278735 WO- 742135 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 44.88 BULLETIN BOARD 278736 OE- 273892 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.88- RETURN 278737 CP- WO- 738114 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 136.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009113 278798 OE- 273676 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page- 4 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 712.79 355012 11512012 129832 BOILER SERVICES INC. 2,612.00 TRUCK WASH HEATER- PARTIAL PAM001087 278738 32003 4402.6710 2,612.00 355013 11512012 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 481.77 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003680 278739 60680713 1470.6510 384.00 00003635 278740 87317755 1470.6510 67.20 00003637 278741 87319336 1470.6510 38.76 00003634 278742 87319780 1470.6510 971.73 355014 11612012 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 187.00 278546 106237 5842.5513 187.00 355015 11512012 111706 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO. 1,962.03 LADDER SYSTEM 00001494 278609 210612 1552.6406 1,962.03 355016 11612012 103264 BRO -TEX INC. 229.78 RECYCLE SORBENTS 00005768 278743 411906 1553.6530 229.78 355017 11612012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,419.55 278438 20630 5842.5514 33.50 278439 20629 5842.5515 821.50 278547 20628 5822.5514 5,274.55 355018 115/2012 100677 CARGILL INC. 10,862.72 DEICER SALT 278610 2900276275 1318.6525 7,789.49 278611 2900278719 1318.6525 18,710.45 278612 2900289923 1318.6525 37,362.66 355019 11612012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page- 4 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL ' RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 -Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 346.00 278440 92105 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 87.00 278548 92120 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 433.00 355020 11512012 124184 CC SEPTET 125.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/8/12 278855 122211 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 125.00 355021 11512012 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 142.83 5596524 -8 278375 5596524 -12/11 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2,395.81 5546504 -1 -278515 5546504-12111 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL , 5,368.61 5591458 -4 278516 5591458 -12/11 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL, 658.72 5528973 -0 278613 5528973 -12/11 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,509.27 5584304 -9 278744 5584304 -12/11 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 36.50 ' 5584310 -6 278745 5584310 -12/11 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 60.90 5590919 -6 278746 5590919 -12111 7413.6186 HEAT - PSTF FIRE TOWER 10,172.64 355022 1/512012 123898 CENTURYLINK 121.28 952 8310024 278517 0024 -12111 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 114.15 952 920 -8166 278518 8166 -12/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 80.07 952 922 -2444 278519 2444 -12/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 315.50 355023 11512012 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 2,465.61 - FLOOR SCRUBBER 00003703 278747 516819 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,465.61 355024 11612012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 139.99 278811 462793 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 139.99 355025 1/5/2012 122084 CITY OF. EDINA - UTILITIES 3,315.36 00110793 - 0155200000 278376 155200000 -12111 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 311.69 00113667 - 0120835016 278377 120835016 -12/11 5111.6189 SEWER & WATER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 77.69 00102561- 0192920000 278378 1,12920000 -12/11 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 3,704.74 . 355026 11512012 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE. 38.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT -- 278748 123011 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 38.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 6 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355027 11512012 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800.80 JAN 2012 MAINTENANCE 278868 010112 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 800.80 355028 11512012 120433 COMCAST 2.23 278713 373022 -12/11 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 4.53 278713 373022 -12/11 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.76 355029 11512012 129426 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PARTNERS 270.25 MANAGEMENT FEES 278590, 113011 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 270.25 355030 115/2012 101704 COOK, BARBARA 258.12 ADAPTIVE PROGRAM SERVICES 278591 11 -1586 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 258.12 355031 11512012 101832 CORNERHOUSE 2,577.06 FORENSIC INTERVIEW SERVICES 278869 2012 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,577.06 355032 11512012 125059 CREATIVE COMMUNICATION SERVICE. 590.00 2012 SERVICES 278859 4013 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 590.00 355033 11512012 104020 DALCO 141.78 HAND TOWELS 00001454 278614 2408655 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 141.78 355034 1/512012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,707.55 278441 631831 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 112.00 278442 631832 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 66.30 278549 631820 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 22.40 278550 631818 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 312.00 278551 631817 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,125.65 278552 631819 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,345.90 355035 1/512012 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 47.81 PLIERS, WORK LIGHT 00005787 278615 649128 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.81 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 7 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355036 1/612012 118189. DEM -CON LANDFILL LLC 94.20 TREE WASTE DISPOSAL 00001137 278379 02- 00343282 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 94.20 355037 11512012 129834 DEWERFF, MARY 54.60 ART WORK SOLD 278794 122911 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 54.60 355038 115/2012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 101.80. 650243624 278749 650243624 -12111 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 101.80 355039 11512012 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,308.25 • REFUSE 278380 1326529 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,980.14 REFUSE 278381 1320095 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 5,288.39 355040 11612012 128084 DIETZ, LISA 96.85 ART WORK SOLD 278353 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 96.85 355041 1/512012 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 65.79 LIQUOR STORE FLYERS 278750 4515 -01 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 65.79 LIQUOR STORE FLYERS 278750 4515 -01 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 65.79 ,LIQUOR STORE FLYERS 278750 4515 -01 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 197.37 355042 11512012 103521 ECOLABEQUIPMENTCARE .4.47 O -RING 278714 92221145 5620.6405 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 14.35 SPACER 278715 92221144 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 18.82 355043 11512012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF.COMMERCE 1,000.00 GALA SPONSORSHIP 278870 30888 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,000.00 GALA SPONSORSHIP 278870 30888 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,000.00 GALA SPONSORSHIP 278870 30888 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 3,000.00 355044 1/512012 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 270.00 YOUTH WINTER COURSE AD 278716 YWC -03 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 270.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2072 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 8 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check #- Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355045 11512012 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC 315.00 278812 W- 477266 5862.5515 COST. OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.00 355046 .11512012 100146 FACTORY -MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 439.71 PIPE ASSEMBLIES 00005643 278616, 1- 3793635 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.65 THERMOSTAT 278617 69- 055660 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.60 ROTOR, DISTRIBUTOR CAP 278618_ 69- 055864 '. 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 185:99. SENSOR 278619 69- 055932 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.40 SPARK PLUGS, WIRE KIT- 278620 69- 055863 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.87 OXYGEN SENSORS 278621 1- 3797985 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.43 OXYGEN SENSORS 278622 69- 055944 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 992.65 355047 11512012 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 11.54 PHOTO PROCESSING 278592 8326063 -T2 -3080 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 20 11.54 355048. 1/5/2012 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 2,285.00 PPV FAN 00003688 278751 49302 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,285.00 355049 11512012 128313 FJELLANGER, STUART - 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 278354 122211 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES_- ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 355050 11512012 , - 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 443.91 278813 3512 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 443.91 355051 11512012 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 784.00 RINK ATTENDANTS ATTIRE 278520 82848 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY 784.00 355062 115/2012 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.13 R -91 PHONE 278752 3562633 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.13 355053 11512012 117811 GOLBERG, CAROLYN 154.05 ART WORK SOLD 278355 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 154.05 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 9 1/5/2012 - 1/512012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365054 1/512012 100025 GOLDEN SHOE STABLES INC. 800.00 HORSE -DRAWN SLEIGH RIDES FESTIVAL 278851 123011 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 800.00 - 355055 11512012 101103 GRAINGER 6.67 SAFETY GLASSES 00005754 278521 9713855543 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 106.19 JAW INSERT SET 00005712 278522 9714518306 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.93 SAFETY GLASSES 00005754 278523 9714933190 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 211.03 SIGNS, TAPE 00001435 278623 9711936436 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 107.05 LOCKOUT SAFETY KIT 00001447 278753 9716040010 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 404.82 PIPE MARKER, THERMOMETERS 00001447 278753 9716040010 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 119.22 RELAYS, DRILL BITS 00001442 278754 9715453818 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 986.91 355056 11512012 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 439.78 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005756 278524 33574 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 439.78 366057 11612012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 164.50 278553 134903 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 316.50 278554 134904 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 481.00 355058 115/2012 124022 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING INC. 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.28 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 57.26 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 57.27 BULB RECYCLING 278624 11 -6921 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 629.87 355059 11512012 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 342.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 278795 123111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 342.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 200.00 CITY OF EDINA 122911 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Council Check Register 200.00 1/5/2012 — 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 355060 1/512012 100918 GRIMSBY, NANCY 600.00 PROGRESS BILLING -PW INITIATIVE 278594 166.40 ART WORK SOLD 278356 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 166.40 278595 3477 355061 11512012 ADMINISTRATION 100155 GRITTON, KAY 6,550.00 150.00 GIFT SHOP SERVICES 278796 123111 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 355066 11512012 150.00 123248 HARMONIC RELIEF 355062 11512012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/15/12 278857 934.42 FORESTRY TOOLS 00001347 278382 14867 1644.6556 TOOLS 934.42 355063 11512012 101387 HAPPY FACES 115/2012 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP TREES & MAINTENANCE 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/31/11 278593 122811 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 355064 11512012 101387 HAPPY FACES 200.00 FACE PAINTING FESTIVAL 278853 122911 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 355065 11612012 129207 HARLEY CONSULTING & COACHING 600.00 PROGRESS BILLING -PW INITIATIVE 278594 3476 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 5,950.00 278595 3477 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 6,550.00 355066 11512012 123248 HARMONIC RELIEF 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/15/12 278857 122211 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 355067 115/2012 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 872.44 PIPE, FLARED ENDS 00001403 278525 4197505 5933.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PONDS & LAKES 872.44 355068 11512012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 263.04 MEAT PATTIES 278755 023617 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 263.04 355069 11612012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 700.00 ACE SYSTEM 278526 1DEC62011 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 700.00 355070 11512012 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/412012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 11 1/512012 -1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 278596 QB19675 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE_ DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 355071 11512012 127282 HEUN ENTERPRISES INC. 184.50 278443 3297 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 184.50 365072 11612012 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 284.60 MOPS, SQUEEGEES 00002270 278717 600058391 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 197.90 SOAP, SANITIZER 00002268 278718 600056663 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 482.50 355073 11512012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,709.00 278641 584422 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 99.00 278814 584873 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 56.00 278815 584669 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,149.50 278816 584668 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 746.50 278817 584725 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 145.00 278818 584724 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,905.00 355074 11512012 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 10.66 MILL PIECE 278625 121311 01370.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON 467.96 EXTENSION CORDS 278625 121311 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 478.62 355075 115/2012 101233 IAAPA 559.00 MEMBERSHIP - ANN KATTREH 278871 2012 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 559.00 355076 1/512012 125093 ILVONEN, ILONA 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 278357 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 69.55 355077 1/5/2012 129359 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 75.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 278872 120511 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 180.00 CONFERENCE FEES 278872 120511 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 255.00 355078 11512012 112558 ISAAMAN, TREVOR 190.38 MATERIALS REIMBURSEMENT 278383 122711 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 190.38 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 366079 1/5/2012 355080 11512012 355081 11512012 366084 11612012 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1419.6102 1322.6180 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page - 12 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5842.5514 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F YORK SELLING 5862.5514 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 278873 010112 100.00 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 124330 JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 300.00 CRANE RENTAL 00001443 278626 6466 300.00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 106.20 VERNON SELLING 278444 1682075 8,624.79 5862.5513 278555 1682094 146.40 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 278642 1682095 103.30 YORK SELLING 278643 1682097 2,146.25 5842.5512 278644 1682096 310.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 278645 1682104 12,134.14 50TH ST SELLING 278646 1682103 23,571.38 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. YORK SELLING 5842.5513 72.72 YORK SELLING 278445 1197707 1,592.48 5842.5512 278446 1201151 40.12 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 278447 1201150 258.22 50TH ST SELLING 278448 1201136 22.11 5842.5513 278449 1201137 517.60 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 278450 1201434 1,288.06 278451 1201433 225.61 278452 1201143 2.24 278453 1201135 8,481.86 278454 1201144 37.12 278455 1201139 221.52 278456 1202326 300.81 278457 1201138 24.00- 278458 520047 30.72- 278459 519946 3.83- 278460 519944 6.17- 278461 519945 9.00- 278462 519706 517.60 278556 1201435 49.12 278557 1201432 9.00- 278558 520488 517.60 278647 1205195 1419.6102 1322.6180 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page - 12 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier. / Explanation 5,453.59 1/4/2012 15:32:51 - 2,244.86 Council Check 1,207.35 1,806:78 2,119.25 - 1/5/2012 1,324.86 113.12 Inv No 883.03 Subledger Account Description 361.97 278648 144.78 5842.5512 234.50 YORK SELLING 673.83 1204997. 517.60 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,942.68 278650 483.15 5842.5512 342.95 YORK SELLING 1,178.07 1204999 1,637.81 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,927.63 278652 137.52- 5842.5513 218.16 YORK SELLING 49.02 1204995 39,789:54 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 355085 11512012 103654: JOHNSON, DENISE 39.65 ART -WORK SOLD 39.65 BOTH ST SELLING • 355086 1/512012 '123696. JOHNSTON, TORI - 85.15 ARTWORK ,SOLD 85.15 278656 278358 122111 278359 122111 355087 1/512012 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 99.33 VACUUM REPAIRS 278756 809 99.33 355088 11512012 120296 'KAASA, GUNNAR 250.00 BUNN HOT WATER DISPENSER 278799 123011 250.00 355089 1/612012 102080 KATTREH, ANN 155.96 OCT MILEAGE 278719 122911 5101.4413 5101.4413 1470.6180 1552.6406 5621.6107 ART WORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description Business Unit 278648 1204998 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 278649 1204997. 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 278650 1205000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 278651 1204999 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278652 ,1204996 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278653 1204995 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278654 1204992 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 278655 1204991 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 278656 1204990 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 278657 1204989 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 278658 1204988 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 278659 1204987 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 278660 1205207 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 278661 1205004 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 278662 1205007 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 278663 - 1205003 • 5862.5512 COST OF.GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 278664 1205002 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 278665. 1205006 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON.SELLING 278666 1205001 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 278667 520530 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 278819 1205552 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278820 1205005 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 278358 122111 278359 122111 355087 1/512012 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 99.33 VACUUM REPAIRS 278756 809 99.33 355088 11512012 120296 'KAASA, GUNNAR 250.00 BUNN HOT WATER DISPENSER 278799 123011 250.00 355089 1/612012 102080 KATTREH, ANN 155.96 OCT MILEAGE 278719 122911 5101.4413 5101.4413 1470.6180 1552.6406 5621.6107 ART WORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000' CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 14 1/5/2012 — 115/2012 Cheek # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 166.50 NOV MILEAGE, 278720 123011 5621.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 322.46 355090 115/2012 100536 KATZ4AMES,.GAIL 26.00 ART-WORK SOLD 278360 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES i 26.00 355091 11512012 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD_ 25.00 BOILERS LICENSE RENEWAL - 278757 123011: 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 25.00 355092 11512012 128224 LAMBDA ALPHA INTERNATIONAL 250.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES - 278874 2012 1100.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY COUNCIL 250.06 365093 11512012' 100605 LANDS'.,END BUSINESS.OUTFITTERS 976.81, LOGO CLOTHING 00004002 278384 11019686 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 976.81 355094 11512012 115852 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 284:66 TRACTOR PARTS 00002025 278758 237648 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 284.66 355095 1161`2012 100852 .LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. I 173.95 LURE, HANDLES.` 00001248 278759 9300362223 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 173.95 " 355096 1/512012 101887 LEAGUE OF MIN N HUMAN, RIGHTS CO 246.75 MEMBERSHIP DUES 278875 2012 1504.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 246.75 355097 11512012 103396 LENT, WILLIAM - 2;467.50: FIREARMS SAFETY TRAINING SUPPLIES 278895" 122811 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 2,467.50 355098 11512012 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 80.00 278463 12465 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 80.00 355099' 115/2012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 1,237.42 REIMBURSE FOR TASK FORCE ITEMS 278760 123011 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,237.42 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/5/2012 — 115/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355100 11512012 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 142.79 VALVE 00005702 278627 00048380 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.79 355101 11512012 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 104.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278761 123011 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 104.12 355102 11512012 101792 LUBE -TECH 624.64 OIL 00006123 278385 1992708 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 60.00- CREDIT 278386 515408 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 564.64 355103 11612012 122036 M -K GRAPHICS 1,257.77 A/P CHECKS 278597 5818 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 1,257.77 355104 11512012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,135.71 278464 122871 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 827.68 278821 123048 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,963.39 366105 115/2012 116376 MA.C.IA. 25.00 DUES 278858 122811 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 365106 11512012 101361 MJA.MA. 145.00 2012 MEMBERSHIP 278879 1775 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 145.00 355107 11512012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 95.80 SWITCH BLOWER 00005603 278628 2120655 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.80 355108 11512012 120502 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SOLU110 1,494.11 GUEST SERVICES CAMERAS 278721 1678 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,494.11 355109 1/512012 129830 MAPMO 100.00 DUES 278876 2012 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA , 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 16 1/5/2012 - 115/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355110 11512012 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT 1,144.82 COMMERCIAL ESTIMATOR 278877 1051890 -2012 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,144.82 355111 11512012 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 59.94 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278762 123011 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.94 355112 11512012 103944 MED COMPASS 3,068.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS 278763 18847 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,068.00 355113 1/512012 103232 MEHA 35.00 SOLVEI WILMOT OOOODUES278878 2012 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 35.00 CHERYL ENGELMAN OOOODUES278878 2012 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 70.00 355114 11512012 101483 MENARDS 15.09 LUMBER 00001344 278598 97083 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.18 LUMBER 00001343 278599 96990 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 14.44 DOOR STOPS, JOINT COMPOUND 00001444 278629 97051 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 114.56 STG SYSTEM, DRYWALL 00001449 278764 98689 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.73 LUMBER 00001245 278765 75408 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 18.09 POLY SATIN, VENEER 278766 78360 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 45.12 LUMBER 00001328 278767 87234 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 24.03 PAINT 00001332 278768 87999 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 22.92 STOWAWAYS 00001420 278769 91931 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 43.97 BRUSHES, PAINT THINNER 00001259 278770 79017 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 12.73 BIT HOLDERS 00001310 278771 83259 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 371.86 355115 11512012 101987 MENARDS 23.20 GRINDING WHEELS 00002033 278772 55311 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 23.20 355116 11512012 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 694.90 TISSUE, CAN LINERS, TOWELS 00003705 278773 32264 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 694.90 355117 1/512012 122772 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC. 21,426.53 FINAL PAYMENT 278894 123111 07102.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #. .. Doc No Inv No Account No 21,426.53 355118 1151.2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,470.00 REPLACE WATER:SERVICE 00001410 278630 34002 5913.6180 - 1,470.00 _ 355119 11512012 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 111.00 MLS ACCESS FEE 278880 1684892 1190.6105 111.00 355120 11512012 117724. MINNEAPOLISIST PAUL BUSINESS J 95.00 1 YR:SU_BSCRIPTION 278881 3343141 -2012 1190.6105 95.00 355121 11612012 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS 130.00, ,DUES -DAVE NELSON. ., 278882 2012 1400.6105 265.00 DUES,- JEFF LONG 278883 #2012 1400.6105 395:00 355122 1/5/2012 101912. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 15.00 PESTICIDE LICENSE 278884. 20017719 1643.6260 120.00 PESTICIDE LICENSES (12) 278885 2012 16416260 30.00 PESTICIDE LICENSES (3) 278886 #2012 5410.6105 165.00:' 355123 . - 1/512012 102137 ,MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATI 390.00 2012 ANNUAL DUES 278887 12456 -2012 1240.6105 390.00 365124 11612012 126997 MISSION: ELECTRIC LLC 713.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 278387 CLUB HOUSE 5420.6180 745.00 ELECTRICAL- WORK 278388 GOLF DOME 5210.6180 1,458.00 355126 11612012' 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS 931.00 WELL PERMITS AND FEES 278527 2011 WATER USE 5422.6103 931.00 355126 11512012 102776 MRPA 105.00 MRPA AWARDS LUNCHEON 278600 ANNUAL MEET 1600.6104 105.00 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page - 17 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4� PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CLUB HOUSE GOLF DOME PROGRAM MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R65CKREG LOG20000 1,750.00 CITY OF EDINA 355128 116/2012 Council Check Register 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 355127 11512012 102776 MRPA 227.44 175.00 ANNUAL DUES 278860 2012 5410.6105 175.00 ANNUAL DUES 278860 2012 1640.6104 350.00 ANNUAL DUES 278860 2012 5710.6105 350.00 ANNUAL DUES 278860 2012 5760.6105 700.00 ANNUAL DUES 278860 2012 1600.6105 5424.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 05473.1705.30 1470.6406 5760.6105 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6585 Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1/412012 15:32:51 Page - 18 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,750.00 355128 116/2012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 215.86 PICKER PARTS 00006114 278389 822093 -00 227.44 SEALS 00006130 278390 823186 -00 55.68 MANIFOLD 00006125 278391 822888 -01 409.61 ROLLERS, WASHERS, BEARINGS 00006127 278392 822950 -00 628.47 FLOW METER ASSEMBLY 00006118 278393 822447 -00 486.04 BOOM VALVE 00006125 278394 822888 -00 2,023.10 355129 11512012 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 845,203.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 278849 123111 845,203.68 355130 1/512012 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 2,344.96 HOSE TESTER 00003711 278774 SO_245806 -1 2,344.96 365131 1/512012 100916 MUZAK LLC 231.43 MUSIC SERVICE 278888 A742226 231.43 355132 11512012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 29.16 MERCHANDISE 00006149 278395 937821022 103.25 278396 938053714 103.25 278397 938053715 235.66 365133 1/512012 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 163.52 FLAT ALUMINUM 00005716 278528 221004 234.11 ALUMINUM SHEETS 00005696 278529 221002 74.38 ANGLE IRON 00005714 278530 22103 472.01 355134 1/512012 115212 NORTH STAR CHAPTER 5424.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 05473.1705.30 1470.6406 5760.6105 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6585 Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1/412012 15:32:51 Page - 18 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/512012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 DUES - ROBERT WILSON 278889 2012 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 150.00 355135 116/2012 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 166.87 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003636 278775 ' P319445000019 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 166.87 366136 1/5/2012 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 172.82 DOT_ FLASHER 00005789 278631 .29431 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 172.82 355137 11512012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC - SUPPLY CO. 16.18 LIQUIN 00009101 278398 41466801 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 401.26 WATER COLORS, CANVAS 00009109 278399 41626200 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART. SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 417.44 356138 1/5/2012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 20.03 PLANNER, REFILL . 00002027 278776 590588260001 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 16.71 WHITE BOARD, MAGNETS 278777 1422171728 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 36.74 355139 115/2012 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 370.48 278400 W11110661 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.64 278401 W11110655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.64 278401 W11110655 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.28 278401 W11110655 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAWT 47.28 278401 W11110655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 70.92 278401 W11110655 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 94.56 278401 W11110655 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 94.56 278401 W11110655 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 118.20 278401 W11110655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 141.84 278401 W11110655 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 162.72 278401 W11110655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 165.08 278401 W11110655 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 208.88 278401 W11110655 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 208.88 278401 W11110655 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 330.96 278401 W11110655 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 2,108.92 355140 116/2012 124675 OKEE DOKEE BROTHERS 300.00 'EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/12/12 278856 122211 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 300.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 20 1/5/2012 - 115/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355141 1/5/2012 118891 OLS6N, LYNN 141.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 278778 122911 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 141.98 355142 115/2012 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC._ 226.29 COOKIES 278402 81045156 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 226.29 355143 11512012 129485 PAPCO INC. 136.76 CAN LINERS, ANTICEPTIC FOAM 278779 69055 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 136.76 355144 115/2012 102440 PASS, GRACE. . 191.76 ART WORK SOLD_ 278361 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 191.76 355145 11612012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 58.65.. 278465 8332061 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 239:75 278466 8332173 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.25= 278467 8332275 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,207.50 278559 8332679 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,908.26 278560 8332696 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.25 278668. 8332700 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 278.25 278669 8332691 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,685.41 355146 1/512012 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 278800 14735203 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 355147 115/2012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 326.10 .278670 59014120 5842.5515 COST OF,GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 326.10 355149 11512012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 404.72 278468 2173295 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 661.30 278469 2172838 5842.5513 COST,OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 124.00 278470 2172840 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 129.25 278471 2172839 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 222.15 278472 2173300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 111.57 278473 2173299 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10.00- 278474 3473409 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 27.15- 278475 3473410 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.50- 278476 3473408 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.66- 278477 3473411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.35- 278478 3473178 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4.67- 278479 3473139 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.00- 278480 3473177 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12- 278481 3473413 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.58- 278482 3473412 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.33- 278483 3473415 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.66- 278484 3473414 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 632.32 278561 2174078 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295.98 278671 2176002 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,298.81 278672 2176003 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,287.58 278673 2176004 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 278674 2176005 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 220.94 278675 2175995 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 625.46 278676 2175996 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 438.47 278677 2175997 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,063.39 278678 2175999 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 278679 2176001 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,744.51 278680 2176000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 577.74 278681 2175998 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.46- 278822 3474033 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 30.00- 278823 3474034 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 6.90- 278824 3474082 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 11,720.05 355150 1/512012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 342.26 TIRES 00005587 278531 044692 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 342.26 355151 1/5/2012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 UTILITY BILLING PERMIT #939 278896 010312 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 355152 11512012 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 487.06 PRINTING NOTICES, CARDS 278780 059663 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 487.06 355153 1/512012 126290 PRESTRUD, MARY CLARE 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 278362 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 22 115/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 48.75 355154 1/612012 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 50.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00001348 278403 257092 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 50.00 355155 11512012 129833 PRINTING ENTERPRISES INC. 353.51 ADOPT A HYDRANT POSTCARDS 278781 47131 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 353.51 355156 11512012 100971 QUALITY WINE 44.00 278485 552179 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 492.00 278486 552067 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 444.26 278487 552162 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,330.23 278562 553828 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,949.35 278563 553724 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,844.71 278564 553596 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 795.85 278565 553723 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 595.21 278566 553827 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,061.47 278567 553564 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 185.60 278682 553829 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,114.66 278683 553725 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 441.33 278684 553597 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 161.60 278685 554436 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10.67- 278825 551419 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.92- 278826 553249 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.84 278827 553241 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 179.33- 278828 555391 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26.65- 278829 554897 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 40.67- 278830 551417 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.00- 278831 553247 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 14,144.19 355157 11612012 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 374.06 MAIL WATER BILLS 278601 6642 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 374.06 355158 1/512012 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 131.74 SAFTEY BOOTS 00005758 278632 2680000000082 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8: GROUNDS 430.48 SAFTEY BOOTS 00005758 278632 2680000000082 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 562.22 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 1/5/2012 — 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355169 116/2012 125936 REINDERS INC. 147.74 ROPE 278404 1366396-00 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 142.57- REBATE 278405 339873 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5.17 365160 1/512012 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,790.00 FIRE TRUCK WATER LINE MAINT 278782 58661 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,790.00 355161 1/612012 106171 ROSE, SARAH 87.75 ART WORK SOLD 278364 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 87.75 355162 11512012 129827 ROSELIUS, DAVID 32.50 ART WORK SOLD 278363 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.50 365163 11612012 102066 RUST, ROGER 240.00 ICE CARVING DEMONSTRATIONS FESTIVAL 278852 123011 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 240.00 355164 1/5/2012 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 249.33 PARTS WASHER SOLVENT 00005761 278633 56573911 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 249.33 355165 1/512012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 50.00 SERVICE FEE 278890 CF111204 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50.00 355166 11512012 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 64.35 ART WORK SOLD 278365 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 64.35 355167 1/512012 102075 SCULPTURE ICE 126.11 ICE BLOCKS FOR FESTIVAL 278850 123011 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 126.11 355168 11512012 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 212.75 CUSTOM SIGNAGE 278722 42584 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 212.75 355169 1/512012 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/412012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 16.03 RUST TREATMENT, BRUSHES 00001249 278783 9416 -5 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16.03 355170 11512012 105664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 455.00 ALARM PANEL REPAIR 278723 67303668 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 455.00 365171 11512012 100629 SMITH, AMY 90.47 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278784 123011 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 90.47 355172 11512012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 72.50 278488 1684229 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,205.00 278489 1659321 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 123.50 278490 1684232 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.50 278491 1684234 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 161.00 278492 1684231 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 505.50 278493 1680597 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,845.25 278568 1659109 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,012.00 278569 1696615 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 399.97 278570 1659384 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 40.62 278686 1659383 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,045.17 278687 1659388 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,302.50 278688 1659108 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 822.00 278689 1659120 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,520.97 278690 1659382 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 40.62 278691 1659377 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 708.50 278692 1659124 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12,877.60 355173 11512012 110977 SOW, ADAMA 331.50 ART WORK SOLD 278366 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 331.50 355174 1/512012 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 278367 122111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 355175 11512012 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 3,913.76 TRASH CAN LIDS 00001282 278602 17160 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 3,913.76 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012- 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 25 1/5/2012 - 115/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No . Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355176 11512012 ,101007 STAR TRIBUNE 145.60 _ SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 278785 122511 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 145.60 " 355177 1/512012 129409 STEEN, BARB 79.95 ART WORK SOLD 278368 122111 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 79.95 1 355178 11512012 102639 . STROHMYER, TOM . 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/5112 278854 122211 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 355179 11512012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,049.83 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005757 278532 603091 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.049.83 365180 11512012- 101336 SULLIVAN, MONICA 790.00 ART CENTER ADMIN 278369 122111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 105:00 ART CTR ADMIN SERVICES 278797 123111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 895.00 355181 1/5/2012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS . 307.33 NEW YEARS EVE AD 278406 1354400 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 307:33- NEW YEARS EVE AD 278406 1354400 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 307.34 NEW YEARS EVE AD 278406 1354400 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER -VERNON SELLING 922.00 355182 11612012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO.. 1,178.00 278494 V001215 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 509.00 .278495. V001204 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 601.00 278832 JM7783 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,288.00 355183 11612012 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 128.05 ART WORK SOLD 278370. 122211 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 128.05 355184: 11512012 102299 - TAPPER, ELIZABETH 97.50 ART WORK SOLD - 278371 122211 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 355185 11512012 101027 TARGET BANK R55CKREG LOG20000 ART CENTER REVENUES COST,OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier [Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1104.70 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 278407 - 121811 5410.6406 104.70 355186 11512012 120602 TEAGUE; CARY 82.14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278603 122811 1140.6107 82.14 355187 116/2012 102227 THOMPSON, PAUL 58.50; ART WORK SOLD _ 278372 - 1122211 5101.4413 58.50 355188 11612012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 53:50, 278571 669485 5862.5515 3,404.95;, 278572 669484 5862.5514 144:75 - -. 278693. 664546- 5862.5515 3,603.20 _355189,, 1/5/2012 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 114.34 ., HEALTH & WELLNESS PRIZES 278786 123111 1513.6218 114.34 355190 . 11612.012 103277:, TITAN MACHINERY 122.96 SEAL 00005706 278634 9C03806 1553.6585 558.19 FILTERS, 5G HYTRAN 00005719 .278635 9C04036 1553.6585 27.11- CREDIT 00005720.278636 9C04065 1553.6585 654.04 355191 1/512012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 69.37 SHIELD CAPS 00005701. 278533 377083 1553.6585 55.83 FLUX & WELDING COMPOUND 00002026 278787 . 376352 5630.6406 125.20_ 355,192 11512012 103153, TREUTING,.KRISTEN . 47.45 ARTWORK SOLD 278373 122211 5101.4413 47.45 355193. 115/2012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 376.11 - BLADES, SHAFT 00006124 278408 S129142 5422.6530 154.14- CREDIT 278409, TC01065 1553.6583 221.97 355194 116/2012 123969 .TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page - 26 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST,OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER = VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES REPAIR PARTS - MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN J R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page- 27 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 278788 101864363 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20.00 355196 1/612012 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 912.16 SCISSORS LIFT REPAIRS 00002249 278724 100053401 -001 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 912.16 355196 11612012 124504 US HWY 169 CORRIDOR COALITION 3,000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 278891 2012 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 3,000.00 355197 11512012 101354 USGA 110.00 BRAEMAR GC MEMBERSHIP 278892 010112 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 110.00 355198 11512012 123319 VACATION SPORTS 1,169.87 WINTER UNIFORMS 278410 2116 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 1,169.87 355199 115/2012 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 204.96 OXYGEN 00003649 278789 03781802 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 204.96 355200 1/5/2012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 486.61 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 278725 221891 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 25.47 CAN LINERS 278790 221890 -00 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 512.08 355201 11512012 119464 VINOCOPIA 266.00 278496 0049717 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 612.00 278573 0050028 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.00 278833 0049718 -IN 5642.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 883.00 365202 11512012 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 480.08 LIGHTING 00001438 278637 15194922 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 484.81 LIGHTING 00001438 278637 15194922 -00 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 835.58 ELECTRIC EYE MOTION SENSOR 00001339 278638 15194159 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,800.47 365203 11612012 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 2,793.94 MOTOROLA COST ALLOCATION 278893 70972 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,793.94 355204 11512012 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 134.56 NOZZLE 00005783 278639 0043906 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 134.56 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page - 28 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355205 115/2012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,417.26 278497 288476 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 725.20 278498 288475 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,712.92 278574 288603 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 731.55 278575 288771 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,744.44 278576 288764 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 118.15 278577 288767 -00 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 865.44 278834 289047 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,314.96 355208 1/5/2012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 200.46 278499 390921 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 584.96 278500 390977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 83.87 278501 390763 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 875.71 278502 390922 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.68- 278503 56226 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,572.56 278694 391685 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,822.77 278695 391687 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .47 278696 391686 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,133.50 278697 391688 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,245.62 365208 11512012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,231.32 278504 679616 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 162.99 278505 679618 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 668.12 278506 679617 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 187.30 278578 681064 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,617.54 278579 681063 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22,095.45 278580 681068 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 323.88 278581 681069 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,393.95 278582 681070 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 655.25 278583 681072 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 196.35 278584 681071 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,620.37 278585 681060 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,819.17 278698 681062 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 201.92 278699 681061 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/5/2012 - 115/2012- Check # Date Amount - Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 74.67 278700 681066 5822.5515 337.85 278701 681065 5822.5512 1,130.90 278702 681067 5822.5513 84.07- 278703 •849944 5842.5512 4,077.22 278835 682627 5842.5512 261.69- 278836 683356 5842.5512 2,433.10 278837 683726 5822.5513 7,838:54 278838 683725 5862.5513 5,348.80 278839 683727 5842.5513 161:10= 278840 850593 5862.5513 105:53- 278841 850398 5822.5512 67,325.68 355209:..• 11512012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER - .01 278507 840765 5862.5514 278508 840764 5862.5514 .03 278509 840763 5862.5514 .03 278510 840762 5862.5514 3,127.64 278511 840766 5862.5514 3,299.45 278512 841551 5842.5514 215.00 278513 841553 5842.5514 86.00 278514 841552 5842.5515 3,308.50 278586 841554 5862.5514 1,527.64 278587 840567 5822.5514 .03 278704 840566 5822.5514 901.49 278842 643335 5822.5514 2,800.55 278843 843551 5862:5514 172.20 278844 843552 5862.5515 47.90 278845 843766 5862.5514 83.95 278846 843734 5822.5514 2,715.02 278847 843531 5842.5514 18,285.47 - 355210 116/2012 118395, WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 655.65 HELMETS 00003687 278791 E904230 1470.6552 655.65 355211 1/512012 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY - 1,147.71 PICKER DRUMS '00006129 278411 269101 5424.6530 . 1,147.71 355213 115/2012 101726 XCEL ENERGY Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST, OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page- 29 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING, YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING- 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Council Check Register Page - 30 1/5/2012 - 11512012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv-No. Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 62.46 51- 4420190 -3 278412 308233850 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,990.24 51- 5547446 -1 278413 308411165 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 8,730.22 51- 6644819 -9 278414 308428302 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 73.70 51- 8976004 -9 278415 308457560 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 262.34 51- 8987646 -8 278416 308458123 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 227.25 51- 9337452 -8 278417 308464616 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 65.11 51- 8997917 -7 278418 308324958 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 128.64 51- 8526048 -8 278419 308304972 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 548.38 51- 8324712 -5 278420 308305884 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 389.45 51- 9251919 -0 278421 308315067 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 10.09 51- 65410842 278422 308276035 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.61 51- 68922245 278423 308283782 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,215.41 51- 5107681 -4 278424 308401693 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 54.98 51- 9422326 -6 278425 308476858 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 818.94 51- 9011854 -4 278534 308470444 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 89.41 51- 9608462 -5 278535 308477493 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 10.09 51- 60501842 278536 308284839 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 123.70 51- 97701647 278537 308325263 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.76 51- 9770163 -6 278538 308326126 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,511.96 51- 9603061 -0 278539 308468415 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 36.90 51- 0193479 -4 278540 308339226 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 52.20 51- 0223133 -2 278541 308178464 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 28.25 51- 0194596 -8 278542 308178862 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 34.70 51- 0160483 -1 278543 308176335 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 62.17 51 -6692497 -0 278544 308516023 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 2,185.53 51- 6223269 -1 278545 308419402 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 241.02 51- 4621797 -2 278604 308239755 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 43.23 51- 5276505 -8 278605 307255924 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,387.83 51- 4159265 -8 278792 308231799 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 6,710.40 51- 6955679-8 278848 308969575 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 35,156.97 355214 11512012 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 108.33 STAPLES 278726 117346068 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 108.33 355215 11512012 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 124.44 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 278606 54167838 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 124.44 1,317,436.12 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount. Supplier/ Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/5/2012 — 1/5/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Check Total Total Payments Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1/4/2012 15:32:51 Page- 31 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Coundl Check Summary 1/5/2012 - 1/5/2012 Company; Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 138,731.15 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 11.54 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 29,815.63 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,694.34 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,095.61 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 57.26 05400 `GOLF COURSE FUND 11,631.46 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 145.00 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 18,607.85 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,584.00 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND - 1,947.54 05800 LIQUOR FUND 248,347.79 05900 UTILITY FUND 851,313.09; 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 909.34 07400 -PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,544.52 Report Totals 1,317,436.12 _1, FAF 1/4/2012 15:33:32 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing:policies and R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 1 1/12/2012 - 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355216 111212012 100609 .50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIA 572.00 ANNUAL DUES 279015 7 -689 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 572.00 355217 111212012 100613 AAA 31.00 VEHICLE PLATES 279016 010412 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 77.00 VEHICLE TABS 279017 JAN04 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.00- 279272 01/04/12 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.00 355218 111212012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 895.26 UB TEMP . 278925 34607568 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 895.26 - 355219 111212012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 122.00 279053 0816177 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 78.80 279315 0816180 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 200.80 355220 111212012 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 27.47 SWITCH; CAP, BEARING 00005730 279018 S026940 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.47 355221 111212012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 251.28 COFFEE 279203 126529 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 251.28 355222 1112/2012 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 2,303.24 REBUILD KITS 00001405 279204 110601 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 2,303.24 355223 111212012 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 327.90 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 279205 110905 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 327.90 355224 111212012 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 11.38 ART WORK SOLD, .. 279137 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 11.38 - 355225 1/1212012 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO.. 60.46 ACCESS ROPE 00002263 279206 3142838 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 60.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/12/2012 -1112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 355226 1112/2012 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page- 2 C 32.28 279207 123111 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 51.76 279207 123111 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 57.06 279207 123111 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 143.34 279207 123111 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 191.70 - 279207 123111 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 234.83 279207 123111 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 360.70 279207 123111 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,071.67 355227 111212012 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 781.41 COPIER PAPER 279274 10308809 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 781.41 355228 1112/2012 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE - 180.00 ' GIFT SHOP SERVICES 279133 123111 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 180.00 366229 117212012 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE _ 882.22 CONCESSION PRODUCT 279208 1669594 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 582.43 CONCESSION PRODUCT 2792.75 1671695 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,464.65 355230 1/1212012 100634 -ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 1,344.44 REMOTE CONTROL 00005775 279209 10095291 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.83 BEARINGS 00005718 279210 10095294 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.83- CREDIT ON ACCT 279211 10086602 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 411.31 CRANE REPAIR 00001604 279252 10095472 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,854.75 356231 111212012 120637 ASSOCIATION OF MINN BUILDING O 400.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 279276 010112 1495.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 400.00 355232 111212012 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 144.23 ALTERNATOR 00005595 279154• 109692 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN • 144.23 355233 1112/2012 112862 AXELSON, MARY 15.60 ART WORK SOLD 279138 . 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 C R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 3 1/12/2012 - 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355234 111212012 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 17.05 BATTERY 00005729 279019 020 - 237089 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.11 BATTERIES 279155 018- 255308 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.39 . BATTERY REBUILD 279212 018 - 250682 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.55 355235 111212012 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 84.64 DEC MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278978 123111 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 84.64_ 355236 111212012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 280.10 279316 71687700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 279.10 279317 71698600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 34.71 279318 71698500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,653.46 279319 71687800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 31.07 279320 71696500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 205.38 279321 86234300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 144.11 279322 86234200 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,627.93 355237 111212012 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 105.30 ART WORK SOLD 279139 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 105.30 355238 111212012 117697 BENSON, NANCY 107.25 ART WORK SOLD 279140 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 107.25 356239 111212012 115067. BENSON, RON PAUL 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 279141 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 355240 1/1212012 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 40.64 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279156 010311 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE _ POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.64 355241 1112/2012 106670, BERNER, JIM 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/22/12 279269 010112 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 355242 1112/2012 100648 = BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/12/2012 -1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 26.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009111 279157 OE- 275025 -1 5120.6406 1344.6180 1550.6040 1550.6043 1552.6406 1552.6406 1552.6406 1495.6406 4402.6710 5101.4413 1553.6585 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS HOSPITALIZATION COBRAINSURANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page 4 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ACCESSORIES 26.65 GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355243 111212012 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,155.00 REPAIR LANNONSTONE WALL 00001842 278927 996 -3 -2 GEN 12,155.00 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION 365244 111212012 REPAIR PARTS 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION 152,152.00 PREMIUM EQUIPMENT OPERATION 279277 00099 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 11,397.00 PREMIUM EQUIPMENT OPERATION 279278 11006 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 163,549.00 355245 1/12/2012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 42.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 278928 73561 103.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 278976 73665 54.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 278977 73652 37.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 279253 73353 238.10 366246 1112/2012 129832 BOILER SERVICES INC. 20,896.00 2ND PARTIAL PMT -TRUCK WASH 00001087 279213 32003 20,896.00 355247 111212012 117411 BONK, RICHARD 15.60 ART WORK SOLD 279142 010512 15.60 355248 111212012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 404.86 PANEL 00005489 278979 574599 8.13 CAP 00005489 278980 574565 2.67 CAP 00005703 278981 587349 399.52- CREDIT 00005489 278982 574599 75.93- CREDIT 00005051 278983 524378 216.38 - CREDIT 00005489 278984 574492. 187.46- CREDIT 00005489.278985 574565X1 81.44 CREDIT 00005389 278986 564447 81.44 CREDIT 00005384 278987 562342 75.30- BEACON 00005707 278988 589265 211.52 FILTERS 00005698 278989 590558 229.60 BUSHING KIT 00005698 278990 590576 218.91 BUSHING KIT 00005698 278991 590576X1 76.82 MIRRORS 00005730 279020 594516 1344.6180 1550.6040 1550.6043 1552.6406 1552.6406 1552.6406 1495.6406 4402.6710 5101.4413 1553.6585 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6585 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS HOSPITALIZATION COBRAINSURANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page 4 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/1112012 ` 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 5 1112/2012 - 1/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 8.02 CAPS 00005795 279021 594558 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 305.63 CONTROL 00005797 279279 595108 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 499.29 355249 111212012 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 142.75 MATERIALS TESTING 278929 345105 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -383 W44TH ST 315.50 278930 345295 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 341.00 278931 345072 01355.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD 192.00 278932 345103 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 156.00 WATER SAMPLES 00001409 279280 1105447 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 1,147.25 355250 1/1212012 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 48.00 SLU CONFERENCE 279314 010912 1100.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 48.00 355251 111212012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 1,920.00 CONNECTION CHARGES 279214 33639 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 355252 1/12/2012 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/26/12 279270 010112 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 355253 111212012 100391 CALL ONE INC. 182.79 HEADSETS 279281 260989 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 182.79 355264 111212012 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 279143 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 355255 1/1212012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,069.00 279054 23744 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 563.35 279055 23745 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 33.50 279056 23742 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 2,665.85 355256 111212012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 356.00 279057 92165 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199.50 279058 92166 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 555.50 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/k ._ 7:43:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 1/12/2012 - 1/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365267 111212012 _ 100681 CATCO 136.50 PURGE VALVE KITS 00005786 279215 3 -21676 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 273.00 PURGE VALVE KITS 00005786 279216 3 -21729 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 409.50 355258 1112/2012 123898 CENTURYLINK 55.73 952 929 -0297 279022 0297 -12/11 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 306.86 952 927 -8861 279023 8861 -12111 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 107.72 952 826 -7398 279024 7398 -12/11 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 83.52 952 941 -1019 279025 1019 -12111 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 55.97 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12111 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.67 -612 Z28 -0146 279026 _ 0146 -12/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 117.41 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12/11 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 120.68 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12/11 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY, 140.09 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12111 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 166.17 612 Z28 -0146 - 279026 0146 -12/11 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 228.61 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12/11 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 235.07 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.74 612 Z28 -0146 279026 0146 -12/11 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,062.12 612 Z28-0146 279026 0146 -12/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.17 952 922 -9246 279158 9246 -12/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,045.53 355259 111212012 129845 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 206.29 PREMALUSE 00005601 279217 583341 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 206.29 356260 111212012 129487 CHALK TALK 450.00 MENU PRICE BOARD 279218 11 -3304 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 450.00 355261 1/1212012 120613 CHATTERTON, LINDA 38.97 'ART WORK SOLD 279144 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 38.97 355262 111212012 101264. CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 424.00 2012 SAFETY BOOTS 00005771 279027 9502 .5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 444.00 2012 SAFETY BOOTS 00005771 279027 9502 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 996.00 2012 SAFETY BOOTS 00005771-279027 9502 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,864.00 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page - 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS Council Check Register 111212012 -- 1/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 355263 111212012 124964 CHIDESTER, THERESA ,. 17.71 ART WORK SOLD 279145 010512 5101.4413 17.71 356264 111212012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 65.50 279059 463043 5842.5514 65.50 355265 111212012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 311.69 00079303 - 0155300018 278992 155300018 -12/11 5511.6189 - 47.36 00079303- 0155300009 278993 155300009 -12111 5511.6189 359.05 355266 111212012 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 20.65 % XCEL STORM LS 00001414 278933 5101 5934.6185 20.65 355267 111212012 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11.00 BOX LUNCH FOR MEETING 00130654 278994 35217 1100.6106 11.00 355268 11121.2012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 255:80 279323 0198030106 5842.5515 " 255.80 355269 111212012 .120433 COMCAST 88.28 X8772 10 614 0177449 279028 177449 -12/11 5420.6188 74.95 :8772 10 614 0165667 279029 165667 -12/11 5422.6406 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 279030 199138 -12111 5422.6188 82.60 8772 10 614 0164959 279282 164959 -12/11 5430.6188 304.83 365270 111212012 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 879.98 CABLE TV AND INTERNET 278995 12/2011 5822.6122 879:98 CABLE N AND INTERNET 278995 12/2011 5842.6122 879.99 CABLE TV AND INTERNET 278995 1212011 5862.6122 2,639.95 355271 1/1212012 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 400.86 CLAY 00009108 279159 INV000065490 5110.6564 58.98- CREDIT 279160 R200375984 5110.6564 341.88 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page - 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE _ GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE , RICHARDS GOLF COURSE , ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 I - Council Check Register Page - 8 1/1212012 - 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount .Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355272 1/1212012 100697 COOL AIR, MECHANICAL 2,958.33 • . HVAC MAINTENANCE 278996 76646 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,958.33 355273 1/12/2012 124910 COURSE-TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING SOFTWARE 279031 178957 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION i. - 100.00 355274 111212012 104020 DALCO 2,007.26 ICE MELT 00001341 278934 2408663 4090.64061- GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,007.26 355275 111212012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,148.76 279060 632691 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,780.45 279061. 632690 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 87.80 279324 632701 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,017.10 279325 632700 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,034.11 355276 111212012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 20.00 278997 110312148 -12/11 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 20.00 278997 110312148 -12/11 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 20.00 278997 110312148 -12/11 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,369.10 279161 110311893 -12/11 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,429.10 355277 111212012 115356 DIEKMAN, LARRY 131.94 2012 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279032 010112 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 131.94 355278 111212012 112663 'DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 279033 28582 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 279033 28582 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 683.34 , DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 279033 28582 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,050.00 .355279 1112/2012 129848 DOUGLAS COUNTY 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 279283 010512 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 355280 111212012 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES j CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 9 - 1/12/2012 — 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,956.31 CHEMICALS 00001840 279254 82701947 -11 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,956.31 355281 111212012 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 72.00 CARAMEL CORN 279219 1517 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 72.00 355282 111212012 123253 DYNAMIC PUBLISHING LLC 1,926.66 2012 TOWN PLANNER AD 279034 120048 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,926.67 2012 TOWN PLANNER AD 279034 120048 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,926.67 2012 TOWN PLANNER AD 279034 120048 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5,780.00 355283 111212012 103521 ECOLAB EQUIPMENT CARE 60.12 SEAL, O -RING, PLUG 279220 92224417 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 60.12 355284 111212012 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 264.36 T -90 REPAIRS 279221 59412 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 264.36 355285 1/1212012 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,077.00 DEC BILLING 279162 010412 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,077.00 355286 111212012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 65.54 FILTERS 00005766 278935 69- 056165 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.26 'U- JOINTS 00005766 279035 69- 056362 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.59 CV SHAFTS 06005766 279036 69- 056324 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.45 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005766 279284 69- 056461 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 319.84' 365287 111212012 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 168.00 279326 4009 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 168.00 355288 111212012 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 257.83 DOOR LOCK REPAIRS 00006421 279222 267963 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUBHOUSE 257.83 355289 111212012 101475 FOOTJOY 108.47 SHOES 279163 4066279 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 10 1/12/2012 -1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 67.78 MERCHANDISE 279164 4067048 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 176.25 355290 1112/2012 102727 FORCE AMERICA 427.50 PUMP 00005790 279165 01376777 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 176.89- CREDIT 00005677 279166 01376851 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 250.61 355291 111212012 106351 FOSTER; REBECCA " 79.37 DEC MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278936 123011 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 79.37 355292 111212012 100764 G & K SERVICES 73.87 SHOP TOWELS 279223 - 1006473128 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 73.87 279224 1006495126 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 11.10 279311 1006517001 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 158.84 355293 1/12/2012 127497. GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES INC 1,185.00 ..BENEFITS BOOKLETS 278937 13619 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,185.00. 355294 111212012 119737 GLOCK INC. - 55.79 MAGS 279167 649749 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.79 355295 111212012 129838 GLOWING HEARTH & HOME 70.96 PERMIT REFUND. 278998 ED112147 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 70.96 355296 1/1212012 101156 GOPHER SIGN CO. 3,975.75 SIGN POSTS 00001451 278938 86816 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 3,975.75 355297 1/1212012 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 399.75.- DEC SERVICE 00001417 279225 29892 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 399.75 355298 1/1212012 114710 GORSE] SHERRY 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 279146 010312 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 l R55CKREG LOG20000 5,451.00 CITY OF EDINA 135022 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 182.25 279063 135052 .5842.5513 1/12/2012 - 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description, 355299 111212012 355301 101103 GRAINGER 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 60.47 LIGHT BULBS 00002269 279226 9714342129 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 278939 101.19 AIR FILTERS 00002274 .279227 9716109641 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 269.73 85.31 FILTERS 00002274 279228 9716109633 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 355302 24.62 POWER CORD 00005722 279229 9717537741 1553.6556 TOOLS 95.00 HOSE; FITTINGS, NOZZLES 00001497 279230 9718156301 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 010612 28.50 BENCH GRINDER KITS 00005724 279231 9718013668 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 395.09 355303 355300 111212012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page- 11 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WELL HOUSES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,451.00 279062 135022 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 182.25 279063 135052 .5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,633.25 355301 1/1212012 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 269.73 DEC MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 278939 123111 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 269.73 355302 111212012 120834 . GREEN, RICK 348.00 _GRINDING EQUIPMENT ROTORS 279285 010612 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 348.00 355303 111212012 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 3,206.00 GOLF LESSONS 279168 010412 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 4,859.00 GOLF LESSONS 279168 010412 5401.4602 LESSONS, GOLF REVENUES 8,065.00 355304 1/12/2012 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 51.77 PAPER 00001429 278940 284213 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 106.53 OCE & HP PAPER 279255 284211 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 158.30 355305 1112.12012 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 15.01 SOD 00001414 278941 2- 125184 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 37.41 SAND, ROCK 00001132 278942 1- 124331 5932.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL STORM SEWER 52.42 355306 111212012 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS - 112.22 THERMAL PAPER 278999 103696 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 112.22 355307 111212012 129847 HART, JOHN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 12 1/12/2012 -1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier L Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 256.00 CLASS REFUND 279286 010312 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 256.00 355308 111212012 125270. HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUNTS • 5,101.39 PREMIUM' 279288 5692088 -7 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE- 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 9.50 BASIC LIFE COBRA 279289 JAN 2012 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL i 5,110.89 355309 111212012 122150• HAUER, NORM 75.00 CARICATURE ARTIST 279287 010312 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 75.00 j 355310 111212012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 TIER BUNDLED SERVICE 279232 1000010373 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 160.31 355311 1.11212.012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 TIER 2 BUNDLED SERVICE 279233 1000010372 1400.6160. DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 355312 111212012 100801' HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 869.79 DEC BOOKING FEES 279234 1000010406 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 869.79 355313 111212012 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY _ 2,017.80 LAPTOPS 279169 50481444 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS " 1,284.33 PCS 00004382 279170 50555556 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 653.92 VIDEO LINK PC' 00004385 279171 50557678 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,284.33 COMPUTERS 00004385 279172 50558328 1281.6579 TRAINING AIDS TRAINING 1,284.34'. COMPUTERS 00004385 279172 50558328 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 885.98 NEW SERVER FOR BGC 00004390 279173 50569968 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 428.84' LCD MONITOR 279174 50587499 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING . POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 7,839.54 355314 1112/2012 104332 HILL, PRISCILLA 1,055:00 FALLIWINTER SCHEDULE 279134 123111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,055.00 355315 111212012 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 228.81 PAINT 00002266. 279235 003476141 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 228.81 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 R66CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/12/2012 — 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 355316 1/1212012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 337.25 279064 585215 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 494.00 279327 585410 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 465.00 :' 279328 585411 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,296:25 355317 111212012 100808 'HORWATH, THOMAS 328.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 279312 123111 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 328.00 355318 111212012 ,124898 HOYE, PAMELA 17.06 ART WORK SOLD 279147 010312 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 17.06 355319 1/1212012 100031 144 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 11,026.43 MEMEBERSHIP DUES 279271 010612 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 11,026.43 355320 111212012 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 162.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 279236 11129909 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 162.00 356321 111212012 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 1,680.00 EDUCATION INSTITUTE 279290 010112 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 1,680.00 355322 1/1212012 129359 -IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 115.00 MEMBERSHIP -'KAREN KURT 279037 1/12 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 1.15.00 355323 1/12/2012 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 71.00 2012 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279291 010612 5913.6201 LAUNDRY- DISTRIBUTION 71.00 355324 111212012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISH OF MINN 3,143.12 279065 1682136 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,610.80 279329 1682129 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD' BEER VERNON SELLING 1,454.00 279330 1682130 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,207.92 355326 111212012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 364.00 279066 1203990 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1111/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 14 - 1/12/2012 - 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount' Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 22.11i 279067 1209255 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.87 279668 1209241 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11,491.52 279069 1209249 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 279070 1209250 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,494.02 279071 1209253 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 900.47 279072 1209256 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 497.78 279073 1209259 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 529.48 279074' 1209261 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.11 279075 1209262 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,231.52 .279076 1209257 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .65 279077 1209244 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,660.37 279078 1209258 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.12 279079 1209263 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,094.12 279080 1209260 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 966.60 279331 1209591 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK BELLING 229.90 _ 279332 1209247 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 110.21 279333 1209248 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 581.10 279334 1209243 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 520.83 279335 1209242 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,028.41. 279336 1209245 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,445.72 279337 1209254 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,666.72 279338 1209252 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 2,817.38 279339 1209251 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33,810.13 355327 111212012 106839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 255.79 BEARINGS 00005717 279175 D990332 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 255.79 355328 111212012 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 121.03 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279176 123111 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.03 355329 111212012 111018 . KEEPRS INC. - 143.97 UNIFORMS 00003685 279237 179034 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.99 00003684 279238 179033 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.99 00003712 279239 179491 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 766.01 00003670 279240 179001 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,056.96 355330 1112/2012 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 114.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 278943 4661886 01237.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1111/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/12/2012 -1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit • 114.40 355331 111212012 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 331.20 INSTRUCTOR AC 279135 123111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 331.20 355332 111212012 120734 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GRO 256.50 K -9 SOFTWARE 279038 12592 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 256.50 365333 111212012 _ 101466 LIEBER, JUDY 8.45 ART WORK SOLD 279148 010312 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 8.45 355334 111212012 100858 LOGIS 1,202.00 279202 34483 1554.6160 DATA-PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,535.00 279202 34483 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,079.00 279202 34483 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,126.00 279202 34483 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,193.00 279202 34483 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,215.00 279202 34483 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,942.00 279202 34483 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 26,292.00 355335 111212012 116625 LORENTZ, MICHAEL 68.96 2012 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279039 010112 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.96 355336 111212012 129840 LOVEGROVE, WENDY 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 279149 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 355397 111212012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 430.88 279340 123616 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,230.74 279341 123507 5642.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,661.62 ' 355338 111212012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 1,508.97 ROLLERS; TOW BAR ASSEMBLIES 00005759 278944 2120678 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 614.89 ROLLERS, SHOE RUNNER 00005763 278945 2120684 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,408.90 IMPELLER, SWITCHES, CABLES - 00005597 279040 2120379 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18,895.50 SNOQUIP XX BLOWER 00005590 279041 1120006 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT CITY OF EDINA i 1/11/2ul2 7:43:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 j t 1/12/2012 —1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25,428.26 355339 111212012 105677 MAGC 305.00 MEDIA WORKSHOPS 279256 SW11ED 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 305.00 355340 111212012 ' 105677 MAGC 60.00 MEMBERSHIP - BENNEROTTE 279292 010312 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 355341 111212012 120502 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SOLUTIO 2,351:25 REPLACE DVR UNIT 279000 1679 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 2,351.25 355342 1112/2012 100869 MARTIN -MCA LUSTER 800.00 PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS 279177 7717 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 800.00 355343 111212012 122878 MARTT, DOROTHEA - 150.00 HOSTING FEE 279178 164 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 365344 111212012 122564 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 324.29 OXYGEN 00003649 279241 03860375 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1 324.29 355345 111212012 113941 MEDICA 479.57 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 278946 DESIRAY LEE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 479.57 355346 111212012 129636 MELANDER, MARK 606.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279179 123111 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 606.94 355347 111212012 101483 MENARDS 177.29 DRYWALL, LUMBER, GYPSUM 00001311 279257 83318 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 52.43 YORK SUPPLIES 279258 93044 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 217.84 STEPLADDER; TAPE 00001500 279259 428 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 9.99- RETURN 279260 34942 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 437.57 3553481 100885 METRO SALES INC R56CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 17 1/1212012 — 1112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 143.21 COPIER USAGE 278947 438045 5110.6161 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3 841 00 4TH QTR USAGE 279242 439800 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PIPE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADAPTIVE RECREATION 3,984.21 355349 1112/2012 102507 .METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 137.50 OFFICIATING FEES 279294 4044 4077.6103 137.50 355350 111212012 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,674.67. SEWER SERVICE. 279295 0000978907 5922.6302 353,674.67 355351 1/1212012 128988 MICRON TECHNOLOGIES 91.23 FILTER BAGS 00001455 279243 020892 1552.6406 91.23 355352 1112/2012 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 14,318.53 WATER PURCHASED 278948 431 - 0005.300111 5913.6601 12 14,318.53 355353 1112/2012 101302 MINNESOTA CITYICOUNTY 175.00 SEMINAR - SCOTT NEAL 279042 010412 1120.6104 175.00 355354 111212012 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 60.00 MN GROWN LICENSE - FARMERS MOM02012 279043 20128859 5760:6105 60.00 355365 111212012 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 1,110.22 PIPE 00001404 278949 0278442 5932.6535 1,110.22 355356 111212012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 8.50 FITTINGS 00005792 279044 0091867 -IN 1553.6530 8.50 355367 111212012 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 43.38 POSTER PRINTING 279293 10549 1629.6406 43.38 355358 111212012 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PIPE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADAPTIVE RECREATION R55CKREG LOG20000 111212012 104350 NIKE USA INC. CITY OF EDINA 1/1112612 7:43:27 16.56 CAP SAMPLES Council Check Register 279180 Page - 18 5440.5511 16.56 1/12/2012 - 1/1212012 Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No "Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/19/12 i 279268 010112 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 CLEAR ACETATE SHEETS 00009109 279181 41626202 5120.5510 355359 111212012 116.41 113819- MORRISON COUNTY 355364 1112/2012 220.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 279045 010212 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 220.00' JAN 2012 SERVICES 279297 80593829 1400.6230 355360 '.111212012 557.72 104431 NENA' 356366 111212012 85.00 2012 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 279296 300000235 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.00 CLASS REFUND 279298 010412 5101.4607 355361 1112/2012 13.00 100076 NEWiFRANCE WINE CO.. 355366 1112/2012 65.50 116114 OCE 279081 70993 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355362 111212012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 16.56 CAP SAMPLES 279180 938104638 5440.5511 16.56 355363 111212012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 75.60 FAUX SQUIRREL FLATS 00009109 278950 41626201 5120.5510 40.81 CLEAR ACETATE SHEETS 00009109 279181 41626202 5120.5510 116.41 355364 1112/2012 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 JAN 2012 SERVICES 279297 80593829 1400.6230 557.72 356366 111212012 129846. O'BRIEN, LISA 13.00 CLASS REFUND 279298 010412 5101.4607 13.00 355366 1112/2012 116114 OCE 74.21 DEC MAINTENANCE 278951 987611040 1552.6103 74.21 355367 1/12/2012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 31.23 CALENDARS 00008098 279001 589681712001 5510.6513 62.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00008098 279002 589681110001 5510.6513 93.66 355368 111212012 103624 P..& L AUTOMOTIVE INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ; COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 .R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/12/2012 - 1112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 171.00 REMOVE TINT 00005769 278952 221875 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.00 ,. 355369 1/1212012 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. 122.14 ONCE OVER 1095/1595 PACKS 00001432 279003 18334 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 122.14 355370 1/12/2012 129485 PAPCO INC. 61.79 MICROFIBER CLOTHS 278953 68795 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 61.79 365371 111212012 100347 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 622.25 279082 8333462 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,78926 279083 8333454 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 531.50 279342 8333459 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2;943.01 355372 11121201.2 - 100,960 PETTY CASH 1.08 279200 123111 5110.6021 JURY PAY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2.67 279200 123111 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5.36 279200 123111 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 8.13 279200 123111 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES. ARENA ADMINISTRATION 8.56 :279200 123111 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 9.52 279200 123111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.68 279200 123111 1100.6106 MEETING.EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 10.00 279200 123111 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11.66 279200 123111 5910.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL (BILLING) 12.79 279200 ,.123111 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 19.08 279200 123111 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 19.28 279200 123111 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.54 279200 123111 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 21.26 279200 123111 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 23.46 279200 123111 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 24.14 279200 123111 1600.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 30.00 279200 123111 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 31.92 279200 123111 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 33.60 279200 123111 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 35.00 279200 123111 1600.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 35.00 279200 123111 1640.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 40.00 279200 123111 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 43.85 279200 123111 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 50.83 279200 123111 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1/1212012 - 111212012 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 51.18 279200: 123111 1190.6106 55.00 279200 '. 123111 5860.6107 5828 279200 123111 2210.6406 60.00 279200 123111 1160.6106 64.29' 279200 123111 5510.6406 70.00 279200 123111 1495.6104 140.00 279200 123111 - 2210.6103 1,005.14 365373 111212012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE\ &SPIRITS 86.00 784:64 279084 2179160 5842.5513 1,797i01 279085 2179166 5842.5513 300.36- 279086 3474168 5842.5512 663:55 279087 2179168 5842.5513 927.42 279088 2179167 5842.5512 226:88 279089 2179163 5862.5513 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 190:48 279090 2179171 5862.5513 589.37 279691 2179169 5862.5513 410.31 279092 2179170 5862.5512 5:33- 279093 3473405 5822.5513 24.08- 279094 3473406 5822.5513 22.66- 279095 3473407 5822.5513 625.72 279343 2179162 5822.5513 346.34 279344 2179165 5822.5513 Subledger Account. Description MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES' CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES i2 7:43:27 Page - - 20 Business Unit ASSESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS FINANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS,SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,209.31 355374 111212012 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 46.30 '• PEST CONTROL 278954 2731080 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 841.21 PEST CONTROL 279046 2724893 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 887.51 355375 1/1212012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 86.00 SCRAP TIRE PICK -UP 00005767 279299 060058 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 363.03 . TIRES 00005767 279300 065567 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 443.03 355376 111212012 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 559.32 HOSE CART REPAIRS 279244 21527 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 559.32 355377 1/1212012 102364 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 283.77 MOUTHGUARDS, LACES 279004 310743 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/12/2012 -1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283.77 ' 355378 1/1212012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 406.36 TISSUE, LINERS, SOAP 00008003 279005 5478 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 123.39 LINERS 00008001 279006 5467 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 440.62 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002042 279245 5472 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 122.50 CUPS;. LIDS 00002042 279246 5476 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,477.67 TISSUE, TOWELS, ICE MELT 00002273 279247 5480 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,267.30 PLASTICWARE FOR PARTIES 00002277 279248 5479 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 5,837.84 355379 1/1212012 103094 PROTECTION ONE 176.43 ALARM MONITORING 279047 12743654 -1112 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 176.43 355380 1112/2012 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,017.61 279096 557337 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 358.40 279097 557017 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,387.02 279098 557137 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 334.27 279099 557138 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,319.72 279100 557135 -00 5842.5512 COST OF�GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 342.80 279101 557335 -00 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 116.60 279102 557336 -CO 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 461.60 279103 557016 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192.80 279104 557018 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . 50TH ST SELLING 115.60 279345 553563 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,364.05 279346 557338 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,622.00 279347 553560 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,902.00 279348 553562 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 115.60 279349 553561 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 13,650.07 355381 111212012 120036 RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,310.26 ENGINEERING SERVICES .379261 15629- 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 4,400:00 279262 15630 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 2,000.00 279263 15631 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 7,710.26 355382 111212012 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 139.99 2012 SAFETY BOOTS 00005773 279048 268000000094 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.00 2012 SAFETY BOOTS 00005773 279048 268000000094 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 280.48 2012 SAFETY BOOTS 00005773 279048 268000000094 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE l R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 22 1/1212012 — 1/1212012 Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 280.48- CREDIT 00005770 279182 26800000085 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE j 289.99.' 355383 1/1212012 123757 RIECHMANN.PEDERSON DESIGN INC 350.00 ART CENTER POSTER DESIGN 279183 1211151 -6 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 350.00 356384 1/1212012 101902 -RINK SYSTEMS INC 513.00 TEMPERED GLASS 279007 1100618 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 513.00 355385 111212012 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 619.88 SOFTENER SALT 00008000 279008 00261616 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 619.88 355386 111212012 129827 ROSELIUS, DAVID 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 279150 010512 :, 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 i 366387 111212012 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005774 279184 _925717452 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 366388 1112/2012 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 545.04 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 279049 8103088998 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 545.04 355389 111212012 100995 SEH 2,657.45 RECONSTRUCTION 279009 251733 03460:1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,821.62 RECONSTRUCTION 279009 251733 04375.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,681.71 RECONSTRUCTION 279009 251733 05511.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,797.15 RECONSTRUCTION 279009 251733 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 16,957.93 356390 1/1212012 100997 SESAC INC. 621.00 LICENSE FEE 279301 3429354 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 621.00 355391 1/1212012 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 272.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 279136 123111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 272.00 r R55CKREG LOG20000 278956 123011 5510.6103 CITY OF EDINA ARENA ADMINISTRATION 3,405.30 Council Check Register 355401 - 111212012 127878 SOUTHERN.WINE AND SPIRITS 1112/2012 - 1/1212012 1667505 Check # Date Amount. -. Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description '' 355392 1112/2012 279107 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 402.50 279108 1666334 53.41 PAINT 00001431.. 279264 0572 -4 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1667503 5662.5512 53 :41 VERNON SELLING .355393 1112/2012 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM - 122.60 NOV /DEC MILEAGE 279185 010412 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 122.60 355394 1/1212012 101556 SHRED -IT USA INC. _ 141.00 DOCUMENT SHREDDING SERVICE 279302 0253895003 - 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 141.00 355395 1/1212012 129841, SIGL, LINDA 109.85 ART WORK SOLD 279151 010512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 109.85 365396 1/1212012 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 109.00 POLO SHIRTS 278955 436408 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 109.00 355397 111212012 116501 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 86.98 2012 UNIFORM PURCHASE 279050 010412 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 86.98 366398 111212012 129842: SIMP..SON, CANDICE 4.88 ;ART WORK SOLD 279152 010312 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 4.88 355399 111212012 101000 SIR SPEEDY 88.17 BUSINESS CARDS 279186 71193 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 88.17 355400 1/1212012 129104 SOLDO CONSULTING P.C. 1111/2012 7:43:27 Page - 23 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES PSTF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,405.30 COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION 278956 123011 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 3,405.30 355401 - 111212012 127878 SOUTHERN.WINE AND SPIRITS i - 335.71 279105 1667505 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,613.32 279106 1710401 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 458.00 279107 1696663 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 402.50 279108 1666334 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 587.64 279109 1667503 5662.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 'j Council Check Register Page - 24 1 1/12/2012 - 1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,846.90 279110 1659152 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,254.07 279111 1667502 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING _ 3,543.52 279112 1710400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ? 773.75. 279350 1664113 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE SOTH ST SELLING 371.50 279351 1696664 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING j 13,186.91 355402 111212012 112668'tSTONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 319.10 LATCH ASSEMBLY - . 00005731 279303 21331 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 319:10 i 355403.. 111212012 _ - 101765 STROH;STEVE 57.48' UNIFORM PURCHASE` 279187 010512 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL \ 57.48 356404 111212012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET i�- 51.05 BEZEL, HANDLE " ". 00005800 279304 369082 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.60 LAMP 00005727 279305 367729 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN � i 114:65 355405 1/1212012 100900 SUN!NEWSPAPERS .- 48.90 EDINA LIQUOR AD 279265 1355150 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 48.90 EDINA LIQUOR AD 279265 1355150 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 48.90 EDINA LIQUOR AD 279265 1355150 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 146.66 ART CENTER AD 279265 1355150 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1 I. 146.66 CENT LAKES PARK AD 279265 1355150 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION .146:66 EDINBOROUGH PK AD 279265 1355150 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION i . 146.66:` BRAEMAR,ARENA AD 279265 1355150 - 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 146:66 • BRAEMAR GOLF AD 279265 1355150 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION i 880.00 355406 1/1212012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,060.00 279113 V001273 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 687.00 279352 V001268 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,747.60 355407 111212012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 221.48 GOLF CLUB 279188 17145393 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES - 140.58 GOLF CLUB 279189 17129194 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 140.58 GOLF CLUB 279190 17129195 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 350.52- CREDIT 279201 16527311 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 152.12 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP WELDING SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES DEPT UNIFORMS BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FIREFIGHTING FOAM PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/1212012 - 1112/2012 Check # Date - i Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No - 365408 1/1212012 101636 THOMPSON, SCOTT 32.89 REIMBURSE SHIPPING CHARGES 279191 010512 1400.6406 32.89 355409 111212012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,983.80 279353 670340 5862.5514 3,983.80 365410 111212012 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 444.29 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 279051 140288 5510.6105 444.29 355411 111212012 127318, TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 600.00- FITNESS TRAINING 279306 INV433 1470.6104 600.00 356412 '111212012 101474 - TITLEIST - 25.60 GOLF BALLS 279192 0118623 5440.5511 35.28 279193 0122254 5440.5511 219.68 279194 0122015 5440.5511 270.64 279195 0126523 5440.5511 551.20 355413 111212012 101038 TOLL GAS' &'WELDING SUPPLY 18.65 WELDING GAS 00005776 279249 434722 1553.6580 18.65 355414 1112/2012 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 165.00 LOCK REPAIR 278957 494215 1552.6103 165.00 355415 111212012 129849 ..TYNER ASSOCIATION 1,770.00 CD SCREENS 279313 010612 1400.6406 i i,770.00 355416 111212012 100363 U.S. BANK 39.98 279250 123111 1470.6510 183.42 279250 123111 1470.6408 303.20 279250 123111 1470.6558 330.15 279250 123111 1470.6405 561.30 279250 123111 1470.6557 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP WELDING SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES DEPT UNIFORMS BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FIREFIGHTING FOAM PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL p POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5,173.64 .. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 111212012 Council Check Register 103048 U.S. BANK Page - 26 1/12/2012 —1/12/2012 Check # Date Amount = Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit " a 1,142.85 279250 123111 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,612.74 279250 123111 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5,173.64 .. DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE.SHEET 355417 111212012 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYING`AGENT 278958 3025703 5510.6103 425.00 355418 111212012 125032 UNISELECT USA ' "q 2,030.93 AUTO PARTS 279266 123111 1553.6585 2,030.93 355419 111212012 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED - - 3,098.76 279251 123111 1400.6203 38.50 UNIFORM SHIRT 279307 102850 1419.6203 3,137.26 355420 111212012 104223 -UNITED PROPERTIES ,q 529,415.49 TIF ASSISTANCE PAY 2011 279308' 010612 1000.1303 529,415.49 355421 1/12/2012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 3,149.51 POWER LOGGER... 00001421 278959 5997063 1330.6215 3,149.51 355422 1/1212012 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 1,750.00 2012 ANNUAL RETAINER 279309. 211030 1140.6103 `j 1 1,750.00 355423 111212012_ 102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 7,053.79 50TH & FRANCE PROJECT 279010 21377800003 1375.6103 7,053.79 355424 111212012 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING'. 254.36 ENVELOPES 00009114 279196 46815 5110.6513 254.36 355425 111212012 1019" , WATERSTREET, JOAN M 148.50 2011 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 279197 010412 1554.6107 .148.50 - 356426 1/12/2012 127768 WIGLEWANDASSOCIATES' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE.SHEET 'EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/12/2012 - 1112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 2 137 50 WEB MAINTENANCE 279011 0000013 1120.6103 5101.4413 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page - 27 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,137.50 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355427 111212012 50TH ST SELLING 129843 WILDER, JENNY COST-0 F GOODS SOLD WINE 'YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF,GOODS SOLD MIX 64.84 ART WORK SOLD 279153 010412 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 64.84 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 355428 111212012 VERNON SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 670.25 5822.5512 279114 289232 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,034.52 5842.5514 279115 289239 -00 226.20 279354 289238 -00 1,930.97 355429 1112/2012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 649.66 279116 392401 73.12- 279117 56437 1,109.93 279355 392399 445.66 279356 392400 2,132.13 355430 111212012 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEB - JAN 2012 279052 923 159.24 355431 111212012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 3,185.93 279118 684467 3,681.30 279119 684484 14,820.55 279120 684485 130.17 279121 684486 41.05 279122 684483 845.46 279123 684482 65.55 279124 664477 5,196.00 279125 684475 1,786.42 279126 684476 79.79 279127 684479 1,819.17 279128 684480 2,595.96 279129 684481 4,540.29 279130 684478 38,787.64 356432 111212012 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,281.65 279131 844225 5101.4413 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page - 27 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5642.5513 COST-0 F GOODS SOLD WINE 'YORK SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST -OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF,GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF.GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Council Check Register Page - 28 1/12/2012 - 1/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.50 279132 844226 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 825.20 279357 845934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 279358 845771 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,149.30 279359 845770 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD) BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,299.15 355433 111212012 105740' WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 402.00 VALLEY VIEW RD STUDY 278960 5- 01686 -220 01238.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 347.37: 44TH ST PROJECT 279012 15/01686 -170 06045.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-45 W 44TH ST RECON 427.10 44TH ST PROJECT 279012 15/01686 -170 03466.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-466 W 44TH ST RECON 1,708.38 44TH ST PROJECT 279012 15/01686 -170 04301.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS 301 SUNNYSLOPE, WOODHILL 3,781.21 44TH ST PROJECT 279012 15/01686 -170 05516.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION W 44TH ST RECON 7,972.44 44TH ST PROJECT 279012 15/01686 -170 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -383 W44TH ST 56.29 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14/01686 -180 03457.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION 375.28 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14/01686 -180 05503.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 750.56 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14/01686 -180 06043.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-43 W 70TH ST RECON 806.85 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14/01686 -180 08057.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION L -57 W 70TH ST RECON 919.44' 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14/01686 -180 06044.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON 1,838.87 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14/01686 -180 04369.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -369 W 70TH STREET 14,016.71 70TH ST PROJECT 279013 14101686 -180 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 6A -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 5,542.00 TRACY'AVE PROJECT 279014 1/01686 -250 01368.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -368 TRACY AVE M &O 38,944.50 355434 111212012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 45.82. 51- 0194596 -8 278961 308675563 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 184.80 51- 6229265 -9 278962 308786520 1481.6185 LIGHT &POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,760.02 51- 6229265 -9 278962 308786520 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 975.37 51- 6979948 -4 278963 308969412 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,312.68 51- 6979948 -4 278963 308969412 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,537.73 51- 6979948 278963 308969412 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 299.76 51- 6046826 -0 278964 308782510 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 242.79 51- 6137136 -8 278965 309113031 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 44.14 51- 7567037 -0 278966 309131572 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 38.98 51- 8102668 -0 278967 308648558 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 634.52 51- 4827232 -6 278968 308592277 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 19.33 51- 4151897 -6 278969 309087914 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 33,833.43 51- 4621797 -2 278970 308613645 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 104.20 51- 5938955 -6 278971. 308781784 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 19,637.99 51- 4888627 -1 278972 309096714 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 646.98 51- 5634814 -2 279198 308775025 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 5,204.65 51- 4966303 -6 279199 308761857 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 111212012 — 1112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 937.79 51- 5847121 -5 279267 309277851 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 67,460.98 355435 111212012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 11,477.45 UNLEADED FUEL 00001200 278973 470024 2,716.02 UNLEADED FUEL 278974 470021 9,347.70 DIESEL FUEL 278975 470025 23,541.17 355436 1/1212012 _ 129844 YOGA CENTER OF MINNEAPOLIS 85.00 FITNESS TRAINING 279310 010412 85.00 1,612,649.82 Grand Total 1553.6581 GASOLINE 1553.6581 GASOLINE 1553.6581 GASOLINE 1/11/2012 7:43:27 Page 29 Business Unit TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,612,649.82 Total Payments 1,612,649.82 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1111/2012 7:44:12 Council Check Summary Page - 1 1/12/2012 - 1/12/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 882,319.93 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,022.82 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 182.79 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 55,004.71 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 18,895.50 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 6,112.65 r' 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,813.59 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,206.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 8,344.78 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 9,015.22 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 31,473.91 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 8,615.77 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 450.00 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,263.43 05800 LIQUOR FUND 170,801.26 05900 UTILITY FUND 398,166.87 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 8,450.87 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 408.33 -09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,101.39 Report Totals ( 1,612,649.82 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and - belief, that.these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City .fv v • % i REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.C. From: Jeff Long ® Action Chief of Police F-1 Discussion Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -16 Approving Grant With Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force for 2012. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -16 authorizing the grant agreement to fund the Edina Police Departments participation in the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. INFORMATIOWBACKGROUND: The Edina Police Department has received state grant monies to participate in the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force since 2005. The existing grant agreement expired on June 30, 2011. Additional funding is available through June 30, 2013, at a rate of $50,000 per year. We would like to continue our participation due to the rapid increase in identity theft and organized groups involved in fraud activity. The Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force addresses major financial crimes and attempts to coordinate the private sector and law enforcement's response to this crime trend. We have assigned one detective to the Task Force on a full -time basis. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and grant copy RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -16 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS FROM MN BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION WHEREAS, the Edina Police Department is a member of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has approved the Edina Police Department for grant funds for their participation with the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina has authorized the Edina Police Department to receive funds from the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for their participation with the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and Mayor are authorized to execute any necessary agreements relating to the grant with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Attest: Adopted this 17th day of January. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF.CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk SWIFT Contract No: 38408 STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT This grant contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Public Safety Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force 1430 Maryland Avenue East St Paul MN. 55106 -2802 ("State ") and City of Edina. Police Department 4801 West 50a' Street. Edma MN 55424 ( "Grantee "). Recitals 1 Under Minn. Stat. 66 299A.01. Subd 2 (4) and 299A.681. Subd 7. the State is empowered to enter into this grant contract. 2 State funds for this grant contract are provided in Laws of Minnesota 299A.681, for the purpose of investigating identity theft and related financial crimes. 3 The State is in need of services that fulfill this purpose. 4 The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to the satisfaction of the State. Grant Contract Term of Grant Contract 1.1 Effective dale, Luly 1 0 110 the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later. Once this grant contract is fully executed, the Grantee may claim reimbursement for expenditures incurred pursuant to Clause 4.3 of this grant contract. Reimbursement will only be made for those expenditures made according to the terms of this grant contract. 1.2 Expiration date. June 30, 2013 or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Survival of Term. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices; 12. Publicity and Endorsement; 13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 15. Data Disclosure. Grantee's Duties 2.1 Activities. The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will: (1) Investigate major financial crimes by organized groups or individuals related to identity theft e.g. bank fraud, wire fraud, credit fraud, loan fraud illegal contraband fraud, commercial fraud, retail fraud and other economic fraud (MN 609.52.) (2) Investigators will prepare an investigative plan for each case assigned to include the identification of witnesses and witness statements, obtaining appropriate bank and business records and their analysis. Preparation of a case synopsis includes witness list and relevant evidence for presentation to state and/or federal prosecutors for prosecution. (3) Investigators will follow appropriate state and/or federal laws in obtaining arrest warrants, search warrants and civil and criminal forfeitures. Investigators will follow proper legal procedures in securing evidence, including computer recovery. (4) Investigators will understand and use appropriate legal procedures in the handling of informants including documentation of identity, monitoring of activities, use and recordation of payments. . (5) Investigators will use, as appropriate, a broad array of investigative technologies and techniques including surveillance, covert technologies and undercover assignments. (6) Investigators will interview and prepare reports on the victims of a financial crime and will be able to direct those victims to appropriate public and private resources to assist them in the recovery of their identities. (7) Investigators must be full -time and dedicated to the task force for the duration of the term of this grant contract. (8) Investigators. must be a. licensed peace officer. (9) Assigned investigators will investigate cases involving cross jurisdictional and/or organized financial crime and high value theft schemes. The assignment may require investigator; to travel to Greater Minnesota and throughout the five county metro area as investigations expand or as assigned by the task force commander. (10) Investigators will be assigned to and report to the Commander of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force (MNFCTF) and will work out of the task force headquarters except for those investigators assigned to a specific task force geographic area. Identity lheffinancid Crimea (11/11) SWIFT Contract No: 38408 (11) Investigator's home agency will provide that investigator with an undercover vehicle and basic equipment (gun, handcuffs, vest, etc.). 2.2 Reporting Requirements (1) Financial Reporting. Grantee shall submit a financial reporting form to the State utilizing the format identified by the State within 30 days after the end of the reporting period. (2) Progress Reporting. Grantee shall use forms prescribed by the State to submit a quarterly progress detailing progress achieved towards the accomplishment of the program goals and objectives within 30 days after the end of reporting period. (3) Other Requirements. Grantee shall submit such other reports and attend meetings and training as State shall reasonably request. (4) Evaluation. State shall have the authority, during the course of this grant period, to conduct an evaluation of the performance of the Grantee. (5) Requirement Changes. State may modify or change all reporting forms at their discretion during the grant period. (6) Special Requirements The State reserves the right to include in the grant, at anytime during the tern of the grant, special administrative requirements deemed necessary to assure the Grantee's successful implementation of the program. The State will notify the Grantee in writing of any special administrative requirements. 3 Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this grant contract, time is of the essence. Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract as follows: (1) Compensation. The Grantee will be reimbursed an amount not to exceed $100.000.00 according to the breakdown of costs contained in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated into this grant contract. The Grantee will submit any revisions to Exhibit A as described in Section 4.2 (2) of this grant contract and the revised budget must be approved in writing by the State's Authorized Representative before any expenditures may be made based on the revised budget. (2) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee under this grant contract will not exceed $100.000.00. $50.000.00 is available from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012. 50$ .000.00 is available from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. Funds not expended by the Grantee for this program through June 30, 2012 are available to the Grantee until June 30, 2013. 4.2 Fiscal Requirements. (1) Budget Revisions Graritee shall submit a written budget revision. request to the State's Authorized Representative before any expenditure may be made based on the revised budget. Submission and approval of a budget revision is necessary if a) a line item will deviate by $200 or 10 %, whichever is higher, from the approved budget, or b) a new line item that was not part of the approved budget will be created. (2) Closeout. Grantee shall have until 30 days after the Expiration date of this grant contract, to submit a report of all -funds and interest received and disbursed. if a report is not submitted within this time period, expenses claimed on the report may be disallowed and the State may request a refund of those monies from the Grantee. (3) Records. Grantee shall retain all financial records for a minimum of six (6) years after the date of submission of the final financial status report, or until completion of an audit which has commenced before the expiration of this six-year period, or until any audit findings and/or recommendations from prior audit(s) have been resolved between the Grantee and State, whichever is later. Identity Thea/Fhie=W Crime (i 1/11) SWIFT Contract No: 38408 4.3 Payment Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted timely and according to the following schedule: itemized invoices will be filed in arrears at least quarterly and within 30 days of the period covered by the invoice for services satisfactorily performed. The final invoice pertaining to each state fiscal year of this grant contract must be received by July 31 of th at calendar year, Reimbursements from the next state fiscal year(s) may commence on or after July 1 of that calendar year, The final invoice must be received no later than 30 days after the Expiration date of this Brant contract, Expenditures for each state fiscal year of this grant contract must be for services performed within the applicable_ state fiscal Year Every state fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. 4.4 Federal requirements. (Where applicable, if blank this section does not apply) Payments under this grant contract will be made from federal funds obtained by the State through CFDA The Grantee is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed on these funds and accepts full financial responsibility for any requirements imposed by the Grantee's failure to comply with federal requirements. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract must be performed to the State's satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Patrick M Henry Commander MNFCTF P.O. Box 21007, Columbia Heights MN 55421 763 -502 -7756 Patrick.M.Henrv(astate.mmus or histher successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee's Authorized Representative is James Hovland. Mayor, 4801 W 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424.612- 874 -8550. i.hovland(@,krausehovland.com . If the Grantee's Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant contract, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Contract Complete 7.1 Assignment The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.2 Amendment,~ Any amendment to this grant contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it 7.4 Grant Contract Complete. This grant contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either ply. Identity IUMimmcig Crimes (11/11) SWIFT Contract No: 38408 8 Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant contract by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract. 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this grant contract are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant contract. 10 Government Data Practices The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. 11 Workers' Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility. 12 Publicity and Endorsement 12.1 Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the. State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. 12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services. 13 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota 14 Termination 14.1 Terminadon by the State. The State may cancel this grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed 14.2 Termination by the Grantee, The Grantee may request termination upon 30 day's notice to the State's Authorized Agent. Upon termination the Grantee. is entitled to payment for services actually performed and agrees to return any unused funds to the State. 14.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, Identity TheMbiancial Comes (11/11) 4 SWIFT Contract No: 38408 for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the grant contract is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other.fimding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of fimding within a reasonable time of the State receiving that notice. 15 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any, or pay other state liabilities. 1. ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certjJies that funds have been enctanbered as required by Minn. Slat. §§ 164.15 and 16C.05. Sided: Date: Grant Contract No.: 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that-the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: 3. STATE AGENCY By: (with deleptrd authority) Title: Date: Distribution: Amy Grantee State's Authorized Representative Identity ThoWinaneial Crimes (11/11) 5 L, °� Le �� y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS of \v $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER less To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.D. From: Jeff Long Chief Date: January 17th, 2012 Subject: Request for purchase in excess of $20,000.00 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 12/16/2011 10/31/2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Nelson Auto Center 1. $49,337.26 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $49,337.26 Contract # 37907 Release T -642 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of two marked Animal Control Officer /Community Service Officer vehicles per equipment replacement schedule. Vehicles: Two 2 2012 GMC Sierra 1500 AWD Ext Cab SLE 1111, .11 Police SOnature Department The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within bu XJ hn Wallin, Financ 'Director Sc t eal, City Manager F- � Le y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF \. �B ^.. - $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To:_ MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.E. From: Jeff Long Chief Date: January 17th, 2012 Subject: Request for purchase in excess of $20,000.00 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 12/29/2011 Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 10/31/2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Nelson Auto Center 1. $26,527.61 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $26,527.61 Contract # 37669 Release A -174 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of one unmarked police department vehicle per the equipment replacement schedule. Vehicle: One 1 2013 Ford Police Interceptor Sedan 7 Police gnatur Department The Recommended Bid is X 4 within budget not within budget W16., Wallin, Fin ce Director Scott Neal, City a ager o Le y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.F. From: Jeff Long Chief . Date: January 17th, 2012 Subject: Request for purchase in excess of $20,000.00 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 12/22/2011 Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 08/31/2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Midway Ford 1. $24,459.40 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $24,459.40 Contract # 35458 Release A -175 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of one unmarked police department vehicle per equipment replacement schedule Vehicle: 2012 Ford Explorer 4WD Police igna Department _ c The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within bud et Joh Wallin, Finance Dire or co Neal, City Man ger otte REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.G. From: Jeff Long Chief Date: January 17th, 2012 Subject: Request for purchase in excess of $20,000.00 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 12/21/2011 08/31/2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet 1. $24,525.35 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $24,525.35 Contract # 35472 Release A -175 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of one unmarked police department vehicle per equipment replacement schedule Vehicle: 2012 Chevrolet Traverse AWD Police tignaturEo Department The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within budget Joh allin, Fina ce Direc r r lic-&ft Neal, City kfar raor REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE -ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.: IV. H From: Marty Scheerer Fire Chief Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Fire Department Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Equipment Description: LUCAS 2 Chest Compression Devices x 2 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: January 3, 2012 February 3, 2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid .1. Physio Control (Sole Supplier) 1. $26,373.50 2. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Physio Control $ 26,373.50 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase, request is for two LUCAS 2 Chest Compression Devices. The Fire Dept. received a donated LUCAS 2 in October 2011; the device has proved to be extremely effective in improving, survival rate of patients in Cardiac Arrest. The two devices requested would allow us to place a devicq on each of our three ambulances. The funding for the devices would come rom th a ital Improvement Program. Aill Pid ature The Recommended is within budget Fire Department owes Cn • fNCORPORAK� • ' 'ass REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $201000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. I. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Ice Resurfacer — Braemar Ice Arena Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: January 11, 2012 March 11, 2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Frank J. Zamboni & Company, Inc. 1. $108,111.77 (includes sales tax) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Frank J. Zamboni & Company, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:00 a.m., bids were opened for the purchase of a new electric powered ice resurfacer machine for Braemar Arena. The specifications called for bids to include a credit for trade -in of a 1996 Zamboni Model 552 electric powered ice resurfacer machine. Only one bid was received and opened. The base bid before trade -in credit from Frank J. Zamboni & Company, Inc. was $116,157.21 for a new electric powered Zamboni Model 552 ice 'resurfacer. The credit for the trade -in was $15,000.00 which leaves a balance of $101,157.21 plus 6.875% for Minnesota State sales tax. The total bid price with sales tax is $108,111.77. The bid includes purchase and delivery of the new Zamboni Model 552 ice resurfacer and an 80 volt output microprocessor controlled charger. The new ice resurfacer includes a manufacturer's warranty that states: " Zamboni warrants all parts and materials manufactured by Zamboni and installed on the ice resurfacer to be free from defects in material and workmanship under normal use for a period of two (2) years or 2,000 hours, whichever comes first, (1 year parts and labor, 1 year parts replacement only) following shipment from our factory to the original user. All parts purchased by Zamboni and installed on the ice resurfacer will carry the guarantee of their manufacturer." This purchase was budgeted under the Braemar Arena 2012 Equipment Replacement Budget at $140,000. If approved by Council, the company will begin manufacturing the unit which is anticipated to be built and delivered between seven and nine months. John p ios, Director This Recommended bid is -,,,x within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department n ith budge n Wallin, Fi nce Director Scott 64al, City ger REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.J. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE / City Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -20 Requesting MNDOT Funding for Tracy Avenue and TH62 Ramp Intersections ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached resolution 2012 -20 requesting Minnesota Department of Transportation funding to improve the Tracy Avenue and TH62 Ramps. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is implementing a Local Road Improvement Program where the State Legislature has appropriated $10M to be dispersed in $500K increments. One of the areas the program is targeting is Routes of Regional Significance. The application is due on February 3 and concepts or solutions do not need to be completed for this application. Staff will copy the resolution to the Edina Transportation Commission; however the timing of the application does not allow staff to go to the ETC first. The ETC will be fully involved in any of the solutions proposed. The Tracy Avenue and TH62 interchange has been identified as having potential safety issues. Tracy Avenue is anticipated to be reconstructed in 2015. Therefore staff has contracted with WSB to start analyzing this interchange for potential improvements and to prepare the application. Staff and WSB feel that this interchange is on a Route of Regional Significance with the adjacent Fire Station and Edina High School / Middle School. If we are successful with the application then a proposed schedule / process will be established for this project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -20 g:\pw\central svcs \eng div\projects\impr nos\ba368 tracy ave fr vernon - xtown\prelim design \tracy ave interchange \item iv. j. resolution no. 2012 -20 requesting mndot funding for tracy avenue and th62 ramp intersections.docx d�s RESOLUTION NO. 2012-20 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDING FROM MN /DOT THROUGH THE LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (LRIP) WHEREAS, the City of Edina wishes to improve the safety and operation of Tracy Avenue at the TH 62 ramp intersections; and, WHEREAS, the City of Edina is requesting financial participation in the project from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) through the Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP); and, WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to providing the local share of the costs if the project is selected as part of the upcoming Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP); and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. The City of Edina is requesting funding from Mn /DOT for safety and operational improvements to the Tracy Avenue at the TH 62 ramps intersections. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward certified copies of this resolution to MnDOT as directed by the City Engineer. ADOPTED this 17th Day of January, 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 2012 City Clerk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.K. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F1 Discussion Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -21 Requesting MNDOT Funding for France Avenue and TH62 Ramp Intersections ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached resolution 2012 -21 supporting Hennepin County's Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) application requesting Minnesota Department of Transportation funding to improve the France Avenue and TH62 Interchange. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is implementing a LRIP where the State Legislature has appropriated $10M to be dispersed in $500K increments. One of the areas the program is targeting is Routes of Regional Significance. The application is due on February 3 and concepts or solutions do not need to be completed for this application. Staff will copy the resolution to the Edina Transportation Commission; however the timing of the application does not allow staff to go to the ETC first. The ETC will be fully involved in any of the solutions proposed. Hennepin County and the City have identified France Avenue and TH62 interchange as having safety issues. This interchange has had 65 crashes in the past three years. Hennepin County has a short term solution that they feel will reduce the crashes at this interchange. Additional analysis will be completed to see if this solution could become a long term solution. Hennepin County and City of Edina staff believes this route is on a Route of Regional Significance. Hennepin County is willing to do these improvements with or without this funding in 2012. Therefore, staff will be presenting their solutions in a future ETC meeting, which will then be brought to the City Council for support. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -21 g:\pw\admin \comm \external \general corr by streets \f streets \france ave \th62 interchange \item iv. k. resolution no. 2012 -21 requesting mndot funding for france avenue and th62 ramp intersections.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -21 SUPPORTING HENNEPIN COUNTY'S APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE AID FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION OFFICE FOR THE (LRIP) FUNDING FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AND CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS TO CSAH 17 AT TH 62 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has jurisdictional control over Hennepin County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 17 (also referred to as France Avenue) within the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Transportation Department has identified safety and capacity improvements for the intersection of CSAH 17 (France Avenue) at TH 62; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County desires to apply for Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP) funds from MnDOT for these proposed improvements with the support of the city of Edina City Council and staff; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has expressed desire to complete improvements at this intersection whether or not LRIP funds are received; and WHERAS, Hennepin County is committed to working with the City of Edina engineering staff on the city's upcoming study project for the general area of CSAH 17 (France Avenue) at TH 62. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council hereby provides support for Hennepin County's proposed safety and capacity improvements for the intersection of CSAH 17 (France Avenue) at TH 62 and the county's related LRIP grant application to MNDOT for these improvements and Edina engineering staff is hereby authorized to work with Hennepin County staff during the project development and construction phases of this project. ADOPTED this 17th Day of January, 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 2012 City Clerk 01VU REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. L. From: Jack Sullivan, PE . ; -17, Assistant City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Engineering Services For Bike Boulevard Improvements Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to approve the attached proposal for Engineering Services for the Bike Boulevard Improvements. Info /Background: Staff has recently received approval from MnDOT to proceed with soliciting Request for Qualifications from consultants to provide engineering services for the Bike Boulevard Improvements. The project was delayed by MnDOT in order to gain the necessary authoriziation by the Federal Highway Administration. Attached is the proposal from Alliant Engineering for preliminary and final engineering services for the Bicycle Boulevard Project as awarded by Transit for Livable Communities. Staff solicited Request for Qualifications for this project from the consultant firms of Alliant Engineering, Community Design Group, SEH and WSB and Associates. After reviewing and scoring the returned proposals staff has selected Alliant Engineering, Inc. Alliant brings considerable experience in planning and implementing of Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) and federal aid projects. They have successfully delivered bike improvement projects with the TLC and the City of Minneapolis. Staff has contacted Steve Clark, the TLC representative for this project, and he's confident of Alliant Engineering, Inc. expertise in creating a successful project. GAPW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\A238 TLC Bike & Ped Way Phase I\PRELIM DESIGNWEASIBLITMPublic Hearing\Item N.L. Engineering Services For Bike Boulevard Improvments.docx ATTACHMENTS: • Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. • Engineering Proposal for Bicycle Boulevard Project in Edina — Dated January 11, 2012 • ENGINEER'S 2012 Hourly Fee Schedule • Email correspondence from the Steve Clark - TLC GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIWROJECTSUMPR NOS\A238 TLC Bike & Ped Way Phase MRELIM DESIGN\FEASIBLITIY\Public HearingUtem N.L. Engineering Services For Bike Boulevard Improvments.docx AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made on the day of , 2012, between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "CITY "), and ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation ( "ENGINEER "). The CITY and the ENGINEER agree as follows: 1. Contract Documents. The ENGINEER agrees to provide engineering services to the CITY in accordance with the following contract documents which are incorporated herein by reference: A. This Agreement for Engineering Services. B. ENGINEER'S Proposal for Bicycle Boulevard Project in Edina including attachments "A" and `B" dated January 11, 2012. C. ENGINEER'S Fee Schedule dated .2012. In the event of conflict among the documents, the conflict shall be resolved in descending order of priority, with the document listed first having the highest priority and the document listed last having the lowest priority. 2. Compensation. ENGINEER shall be paid on an hourly basis in accordance with the Fee Schedule and shall be reimbursed for out -of- pocket expenses without mark -up. The total cost, however, including out -of- pocket expenses, and taxes, if any, may not exceed $30,000.00. This not to exceed cost shall not be adjusted even if the estimated hours to perform a task, the estimated number of meetings or any other estimate or assumption are exceeded. 3. Method of Payment. ENGINEER may request progress payments as the work is performed. The CITY will normally make payment within thirty -five (35) days of receipt of a properly itemized bill. 4. Change Orders. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the Edina City Council. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 5. Warranty. ENGINEER shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work and shall promptly make necessary revisions or corrections resulting from errors and omissions on the part of ENGINEER without additional compensation. ENGINEER shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily 16212301 RNK:01 /12/2012 possessed and exercised by a professional engineer under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement or in any drawing, specification, report, or opinion produced pursuant to this Agreement. 6. Subcontractor. ENGINEER shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the CITY. The ENGINEER shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the ENGINEER'S receipt of payment by the CITY for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the ENGINEER fails within that time to pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the ENGINEER has received payment by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the rate of 1 -1 /2 percent per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the ENGINEER shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the ENGINEER shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 7. Independent Contractor. The CITY hereby retains the ENGINEER as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The ENGINEER is not an employee of the CITY and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. ENGINEER shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. ENGINEER shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for ENGINEER'S performance under this Agreement. CITY and ENGINEER agree that ENGINEER shall not at any time or in any manner represent that ENGINEER or any of ENGINEER'S agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. ENGINEER shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for ENGINEER'S own FICA payments, worker's compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self - employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 8. Non - Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the ENGINEER shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, or age. The ENGINEER shall post, in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non - discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The ENGINEER shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. 9. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 162123v01 2 RNK:01 /12/2012 10. Indemnification. The ENGINEER shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, its officials, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the work or services provided for herein, to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions, willful misconduct, or breach of any substantive provision of this Agreement by the ENGINEER, its officials, agents or employees in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately perform the ENGINEER'S obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 11. Insurance. A. General Liability. During the term of this Agreement, ENGINEER shall maintain a general liability insurance policy with limits of at least $2,000,000 for each person, and each occurrence, for both personal injury and property damage. This policy shall name the CITY as an additional insured for the services provided under this Agreement and shall provide that the ENGINEER'S coverage shall be the primary coverage in the event of a loss. B. Worker's Compensation. The ENGINEER shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect ENGINEER from claims under the Worker's Compensation Act and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of ENGINEER'S services under this Agreement. C. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall secure and maintain a professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the CITY, in the insured's capacity as ENGINEER, if such legal liability is caused by an error, omission, or negligent act of the insured or any person or organization for whom the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide minimum limits of $2,000,000 with a deductible maximum of $125,000. The policy shall also insure the indemnification obligation contained in Paragraph 10 above. D. Certificate of Insurance. A certificate of insurance on a form acceptable to the CITY which verifies the existence of this insurance coverage must be provided to the CITY before work under this Agreement is begun. 12. Records Access. The ENGINEER shall provide the CITY access to any books, documents, papers, and records which are directly pertinent to the specific contract, for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions, for three (3) years after final payments and all other pending matters related to this Agreement are closed. 162123v01 3 RNK:01 /12/2012 • 13. Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. ENGINEER must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the CITY pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement. ENGINEER is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event ENGINEER receives a request to release data, ENGINEER must immediately notify CITY. CITY will give ENGINEER instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold CITY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from ENGINEER'S officers', agents', city's, partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports, and information generated in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall become the property of the CITY. The CITY may use the information for its purposes. Any modifications made by the CITY to any of the ENGINEER'S documents without written authorization or adaptation by the ENGINEER will be at the CITY'S sole risk and without liability to the ENGINEER. 15. Copyright/Patent. ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the CITY from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 16. Governing Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County District Court. 17. Permits. ENGINEER shall obtain all necessary permits required for completion of ENGINEER'S services. 18. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 19. Termination. CITY may terminate this Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the ENGINEER. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable 162123v01 RNK:01/12/2012 4 F expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the CITY terminates the Agreement because the ENGINEER has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the ENGINEER, and the CITY may retain another contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in the Contract Documents. If as a result, the CITY incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed the not to exceed amount specified in the Contract Documents, if any, then the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount. CITY OF EDINA LE James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED By: Its: 16212301 cJ RNK:01 /12/2012 Alliant Engineering, Inc: January 11, 2012 Mr. Jack Sullivan Assistant City Engineer City of Edina — Public: Works 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 RE: Proposal for Bicycle Boulevard Project in -Edina Dear Mr. Sullivan: Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal -to provide preliminary and final engineering services for your Bicycle Boulevard project. Our scope of work, staff hour, and cost estimate detailing our proposed services are included in the following attachments:.. • Attachment A: Scope of Work • Attachment B: Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Based on our understanding of the project and the project process there are several critical paths to implementing the bicycle boulevard in 2012. Meeting the project schedule is contingent upon timely agency reviews and a quick Mn/DOT State Aid turnaround on any design exceptions`submitted. The following outlines key target dates: • Mid to End February, 2012 — Public Meeting • March 15, 2012 - Submit updated project memorandum and. any design exceptions (if applicable) • April 1, 2012 - Submit 95% construction plans to Mn/DOT State Aid 46 June 1, 2012 _ Advertise for bid • August 15, 2012 — .Begin Construction • September 30, 2012 — Complete Construction Alliant Engineering will invoice the City of Edina on an hourly basis not to exceed the contract limit of $30;000. . Please contact me (612- 767 -9340) if you have any questions.or need additional information. Sincerely, Alliant Engineering, Inc. Michael R. Anderson, PE, PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer 233 Park Avenue South, Suite 300, Minneapolis Minnesota 55415 -1108 Phone 612.7583080, Fax 612.758.3099 Attachment A Scope of Work Page 1 of 4 Bicycle Boulevard Design Proposal January 11, 2012 The following documents the scope of work for the City of Edina Bike Boulevard project. The bicycle boulevard consists of the following segments: • 54th Street (France Avenue to Wooddale Avenue) • Wooddale Avenue (54th Street to Valley View Road) • Valley View Road (Wooddale Avenue to TH 62) • Valley View Road (TH 62 to 69th Street) • Valley View Road (69th Street to 70th Street) Task 1.0 Document Existing Conditions 1.1 Document street widths (Edina to provide). 1.2 Obtain Microstation or AutoCad topo files (Edina to provide) 1.3 Document existing traffic volumes at key intersections and roadway segments (Edina to provide — where available) 1.4 Conduct existing sign and pavement marking inventory. Pavement markings will be digitized from aerial photography. 1.5 Document existing traffic control devices. Note: Any bicycle count data required will be provided by the City of Edina. Task 2.0 Develop Conceptual Layouts 2.1 Develop pencil sketch conceptual alternatives for bicycle boulevard or bicycle lane configurations, based on the existing roadway width, existing issues and alternatives developed working with TLC and City of Edina. 2.2 Compare and evaluate conceptual alternatives, where more than one feasible option exists. (Up to three alternatives per segment). 2.3 Identify intersection design treatments to improve bicycle operations where appropriate. 2.4 Document preferred alternative for each segment. 2.5 Identify required MSA design exceptions and/or FHWA request to experiment items. 2.6 Prepare preliminary cost estimates for conceptual alternatives, where applicable. Task 3.0 Construction Documents 3.1 Obtain standard construction details, standard specifications and standard plans (Edina to Provide). If Edina does not have their own standard details or specifications, then Mn/DOT standards will be utilized. 3.2 Obtain CADD standards (if applicable) to be used (Edina to Provide). If Edina does not have their own CADD standards then Mn/DOT CADD standards will be used. Alliant Engineering, Inc. Attachment A Bicycle Boulevard Design Proposal Scope of Work January 11, 2012 Page 2 of 4 3.3 Prepare 95% plan construction documents and submit for Mn/DOT State Aid review. (Note: our scope of work assumes the construction plan will consist of only roadway signing and pavement marking plans). The construction plans will include: • Title sheet / Layout map • Sign panel details • Sign details • Pavement marking details • Statement of estimated quantities • Sign tab • Pavement marking tab • Roadway signing and pavement marking removal plan • Roadway signing and pavement marking plan 3.4 Coordinate with Mn/DOT State Aid. State Aid coordination includes submittal of 95% and 100% construction plans, special provisions, State Aid forms and any parking resolutions required. 3.5 Prepare 95% plan special provisions. 3.6 Review Mn/DOT State Aid comments and submit 100% construction plans and special provisions for State Aid approval. 3.7 Prepare engineer construction cost estimate. 3.8 Prepare project bidding manual. (Note: assumes Edina will provide to Alliant their standard bidding document forms, general conditions and general specifications). 3.9 Update the project memorandum (if necessary), submittal of design exception reports (if necessary) and FHWA request to experiments (if necessary). To complete the project scope within the City allocated design budget, our work scope, staff hour and fee does not include the following items. 1. Intersection surveys and utility mapping. 2. Utility locates, plans, utility coordination, utility meetings or utility plan tabulations. 3. SWPPP Documents. 4. Detailed traffic control plans. However, typical MUTCD traffic control layout configuration details will be referenced or included in the plan if applicable. S. Pavement, curb and gutter or any other roadway or utility construction elements. 6 Roadway sign installation will be shown in the plan at the approximate locations. The City of Edina or the Construction Engineer will field locate the signposts upon installation to avoid utilities, etc. 7. Corridor alignment plan. Alignments shown in plan will be localized to a control point and will be assumed based on geometric drawings provided by the City of Edina. 8. No cross- sections. Typical sections will be provided in accordance with State Aid requirements. Alliant Engineering, Inc. Attachment A Scope of Work Page 3 of 4 Bicycle Boulevard Design Proposal January 11, 2012 9. Detailed landscape plans. If required by project, minimal landscaping plans could be included. 10. Signal design, signal justification reports, or any electrical plans. 11. Bidding coordination, bid advertisement or contract award process will be conducted by the city of Edina 12. Construction services, construction inspection or construction engineering. Task 4.0 Project Management and Community Involvement 4.1 Public involvement • One Public Information Meeting. It is assumed the public information meeting will be held at a point in the project design process where the proposed options are supported by both the City of Edina Public Works and TLC. 4.2 TLC coordination • Support City staff in coordinating design alternatives with TLC. It is assumed the City will lead the coordination effort. (Assume 3 meetings total). 4.3 Project management coordination • Weekly discussions between Alliant and City's PM • Meetings as necessary (assume 1 per month during design phase). 4.4 City Council One City Council Meeting. Attend and present at one City Council Meeting. The project will be presented either following the identification of the preferred conceptual alternative or to present the approved construction documents. The timeframe /purpose for the City Council meeting will follow Edina process. Note that this task does not include substantial public involvement meeting setup on the contractor's part. The City will be responsible for and not limited to the following: coordination, mailers, meeting location determination and arrangements, and meeting invitation response. Alliant Engineering, Inc. Attachment B Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Page 4 of 4 Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Bicycle Boulevard Design Proposal January 11, 2012 Work Task Project Manager Senior Engineer Project EngineerH SeniorTec6 TOTAL HOURS ESTIMATED COST BY TASK Mike Anderson Steve Weser Katie Bruelheide Kris Sharbono 1.0 Document Existing Conditions Obtain and Review Cfty provided Data 1 2 3 Validate Existing Topo and Conduct Sign and Marking Review 1 6 8 15 Document EAsting Data 1 2 3 SUBTOTAL TASK 1.0 1 3 0 10 8 21 $1,860.00 2.0 Develop Conceptual Layouts Develop Concept Akematives 4 16 20 Develop Cornparison Matra 4 12 16 Identify Intersection Design Treatments 4 4 8 Document Preferred Alternatives 1 2 1 1 2 4 PreMnirtary Cost Estimmtes 8 SUBTOTAL TASK 2.0 14 0 42 0 48 $5,460.00 3.0 Construction Documents Prepare Construction Documents and Specificatims 12 24 140 60 136 Mn/DOT State Aid Coordination 4 12 16 Pro' ct Biddin Manual 4 8 12 Pre re Estimated uantities and Cost 2 4 22 Project Memo Update and Design Exception 8 SUBTOTAL TASK 3.0 30 48 56 60 186 $18,900.00 4.0 Project Management and Community Involvement Public Involvement 1 meeting) 4 4 4 12 TLC Coordination 3 meetings) 6 6 Project Management and Coordination 5 meetings) 10 10 City Council i meeting) 4 1 4 SUBTOTAL TASK 4.0 24 4 4 32 $3,540.00 Total Staff Hours 71 48 112 72 287 Average Hourly Rates $120 $120 $90 $75 Estimated Labor $8,520_ $5,760 $10,080 $5,400 $29,760.00 Reimbursables (Mileage, Copying, Deliveries $240.00 SUBTOTAL $30,000.00 TOTAL.ESTIMAT- ED;GOST;NOT TO EXCEED $30;000.00 Alliant Engineering, Inc. Rate Category Billing Table List Thursday, January 12:599:: 06 6 PM Alliant Engineering, Inc. Table Employee Employee Name Effective Date Rate Sequence 22 City of Edina Available for Project Planning Organization: Principal: Project Manager: Supervisor: Code: Category 30 Project Engineer II 90.0000 30 Category 40 Category 50 Category 81 Category 103 Project Engineer 1 80.0000 40 Landscape Architect II 100.0000 50 CADD Tech II 75.0000 81 Project Manager 120.0000 103 v6.2.300 (PROUNSVILLE) - Page 1 of 1 Jack Sullivan 'rom: Steve Clark <stevec @ticminnesota.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:10 PM To: Jack Sullivan Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Edina Bike Boulevard Great. Thanks Jack. From: Jack Sullivan Imailto :jsullivan(@ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:45 PM To: Steve Clark Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Edina Bike Boulevard Steve, Yes, staff solicited RFQ's from 4 firms (SEH, WSB, CDG and Alliant) Here is a recap of the 4 firms: Alliant — Most implementation experience and considerable experience with TLC and federal projects. WSB — Considerable federal experience but did not have as much experience with the TLC CDG- Considerable experience in planning bike facilities however lacked implantation of projects and ederal process. SEH- Respectfully declined to submit. Staff is excited to see the experience that Alliant brings to the project. We fully expect this firm to shepherd this project from planning into implementation in the most efficient manner possible for the City of Edina. Regards, jack X Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -0445 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 a sullivanAci.edina.mmus I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Steve Clark [ mailto:stevec@ticminnesota.orgj Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:28 PM To: Jack Sullivan Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Edina Bike Boulevard I haven't looked at this Jack but just curious if you had any other proposals and if you were able to let other potential onsultants know about this opportunity. Alliant does good work, so that is not an issue. 1 Steve From: Jack Sullivan [ mailto :jsullivan(a)ci.edina.mn.usj Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:16 AM To: Steve Clark Cc: whoule@)cLedina.mn.us Subject: FW: Edina Bike Boulevard Mr. Clark, Attached is a proposal from Alliant Engineering for the Edina Bike Boulevard TLC project. Our goal is to have this agreement approved by Council at the January 17, 2012 meeting. I ask that you review the proposal, especially the delivery dates on the cover sheet, and make any comments prior to this going to Council. The Council packet will need to be sent out to Council by end of the day on Thursday January 12th. That is the time I'd like to have comments from you. Thank you in advance for your review of the proposal. Regards, jack Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -0445 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 isullivanOci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Mike Anderson [ mailto :manderson(cballiant- inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:05 AM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: RE: Edina Bike Boulevard Hi Jack, Attached is our proposal. Let me know if you see any changes. I will be out of the office at meetings from 9:15 until around 2pm today. I can send back any revisions after 2. Thanks, Mike From: Jack Sullivan [ mailto :jsullivan(dci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:11 PM To: Mike Anderson Cc: whoule@)ci.edina.mn.us; rknutson(a ck- law.com Subject: Edina Bike Boulevard Mr. Anderson, Thank you for submitting your proposal for the Request for Qualifications for the Edina Bike Boulevard Project. Your firm has been selected as the preferred consultant for this project. 2 ,+ Please forward in electronic format a proposal for $30,000 by 10 am Wednesday January 11, 2012. I will forward that proposal to our City Attorney, Roger Knutson, for him to draft up an engineering agreement between Alhant and the City of Edina. Our goal is to get this approved by Council on January 171h. In order to accomplish this we'll need to have the proposal and agreement in the council packet by Thursday January 12th. Please email or phone me with any questions. Regards, Jack X Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -0445 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 isullivanna.ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! ,atte REPOR RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.M From: Jeff Long Chief of Police ® Action F-1 Discussion 11 Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Ordinance No.2012 -03 Amending Section 905 Open House Parties ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2012 -03. INFORMATIOWBACKGROUND: When this ordinance was originally written, the definition of "Alcoholic Beverage" was written as "Any beverage containing more than one -half of one percent of alcohol by weight ". The true definition changes the last word from "weight" to "volume ". With this change, the definition of alcohol will be compatible with Minnesota State Statute. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 2012 -03 Amending Section 905.01 ORDINANCE NO. 2012- 03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING OPEN HOUSE PARTIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The definition of "Alcoholic Beverage" in Subsection 905.01 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Alcoholic Beverage. Any beverage containing more than one -half of one percent of alcohol by volume. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk ,e e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. N. From: Jack Sullivan, PE� i Assistant City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -22 Approving Agreement No. 00354 Minnesota Department of Transportation — Bike Boulevard Project Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to sign resolution, and Mayor and City Manager to sign attached agreement. Info /Background: This agreement is required by the State of Minnesota in order for the City of Edina to receive federal funds from the Transit for Livable Communities grants. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -22 • State of Minnesota Agency Agreement Between Department of Transportation and the City of Edina for Federal Participation in Preliminary Engineering — MNDOT Agreement No. 00354 G1PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DRAPROJECT&IMPR NOS\A238 TLC Bike 8 Ped Way Phase 11PRELIM DESIGNWEASIBLITMPublic Hearinglltem W.N. Resolution No. 2012 -22 Agreement.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2012-22 APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF EDINA FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MNDOT AGREEMENT NO. 00354 WHEREAS, the City of Edina has been awarded federal funds for transportation projects; WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Stat. Sect. 161.36, the Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as Agent of the City of Edina to accept as its agent, federal aid funds which may be made available for eligible transportation related projects; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Mayor James B. Hovland and City Manager Scott H. Neal, are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into an agreement with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and contained in " Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency Agreement No. 00354 ", a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. ADOPTED this 17th day of January, 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk MnDOT Agreement No. 00354 STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF EDINA FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR S.P. 120 - 091 -001; M.P. NMTP 2712(079) This agreement is entered into by and between City of Edina ( "City ") and the State of Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ( "MnDOT "), Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.36, the City desires MnDOT to act as the City's agent in accepting federal funds on the City's behalf for the construction, improvement, or enhancement of transportation financed either in whole or in part by federal funds, hereinafter referred to as the "Project "; and The City is proposing a federal aid project to hire a consultant to preform prelimanry engineering for the proposed Edina Bicycle Boulevards project, hereinafter referred to as the "Preliminary Engineering;" and The Preliminary Engineering is eligible for the expenditure of federal aid funds, and is identified in MnDOT records as State Project 120 - 091 -001, and in Federal Highway Administration ( "FHWK) records as Minnesota Project NMTP 2712(079); and MnDOT requires that the terms and conditions of this agency be set forth in an agreement. THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: DUTIES OF THE CITY. A. DESIGNATION. The City designates MnDOT to act as its agent in accepting federal funds in its behalf made available for the Project. B. ELIGIBILITY / COSTS. The estimated cost of the Preliminary Engineering is $30,000. 1. It is anticipated that 100% (up to $ 30,000) of the cost of the Preliminary Engineering is to be paid from federal funds made available by'the FHWA. The City will pay any part of the cost or expense of the work that the FHWA does not pay. 2. Any costs incurred by the City prior to authorization of the Federal Funds, will not be eligible for federal participation. (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 1 3. Eligible cost and expense, if approved, may consist of the following: a) The cost of developing an environmental document, performing necessary design surveys, development of construction plans and specifications, and any testing necessary for the development of plans for the Edina Bike Boulevard project, b) The direct labor charges for City employees for the time that said employees are performing work pursuant to this agreement must be documented in a Public Interest Finding and approved by the FHWA. Said labor charges may include the prorata share of 'labor additives" applicable to said labor charges. Costs to the City of 'labor additives" consisting of holiday pay, vacation, sick leave, retirement, pension, unemployment taxes, compensation and liability insurance, lost time charges and similar costs incidental to labor employment will be reimbursed only when supported by adequate records. c) The applicable equipment rental charges for City owned equipment used by the City and mileage charges for employee owned vehicles used by the City on work performed pursuant to this agreement, at rates reflective of the City actual cost. d) Expenditures for materials, supplies, mechanical data processing and equipment rental, limited to the actual expenditures for the purposes of this agreement. e) The cost incurred by the City to employ outside forces to perform any or all of the work pursuant to this agreement, subject to the provisions of section I.D. SUBLETTING. 4. Expenditures for general administration, supervision, maintenance and other overhead or incidental expenses of the City are not eligible for federal participation. 5. Acceptability of costs under this agreement will be determined in accordance with the cost principles and procedures set forth in the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulations, Contract Cost Principals and Procedures, 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 31 which is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement. 6. For costs expected to exceed $ 30,000, the City must request the preparation and execution of a supplement to this agreement, prior to incurring such costs. C. STAFFING. 1. The City will designate a publicly employed registered engineer, ( "Project Engineer"), to be in responsible charge of the Project and to supervise and direct the work performed under any contract let for the Project. If City elects to use a private consultant for engineering services, the City will provide a qualified, full - time public employee of the City, to be in responsible charge of the Project. The services of the City to be performed pursuant to this agreement may not be assigned, sublet, or transferred unless the City is notified in writing by MnDOT that such action is permitted under 23 CFR 1.33 and 23 CFR 635.105 and state law. This written consent .will in no way relieve the City from its primary (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 2 responsibility for performance of the work. 2. During the progress of the work on the Project, the City authorizes its Project Engineer to request in writing specific engineering and /or technical services from MnDOT, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39. Such services may be covered by other technical service agreements. If MnDOT furnishes the services requested, and if MnDOT requests reimbursement, then the City will promptly pay " MnDOT to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the current MnDOT labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. Provision of such services will not be deemed to make MnDOT a principal or co- principal with respect to the Project. 3. The City will furnish the personnel, services, supplies, and equipment necessary to properly supervise, inspect, and document the work for the Project. D. SUBLETTING. The City will prepare request for proposals in accordance with Minnesota law and applicable Federal laws and regulations. 1. The City will solicit proposals for Preliminary Engineering after obtaining written notification from MnDOT that the FHWA has authorized the Project. Any Project advertised prior to authorization will not be eligible for federal reimbursement. 2. The City will prepare the request for proposal, which will include all of the federal - aid provisions supplied by MnDOT. 3. The City will prepare and publish the proposals solicitation for the Project as required by state and federal laws. The City will include in the solicitation the required language for federal -aid contracts as supplied by MnDOT. The solicitation will state where the City will receive the sealed proposals. 4. The City may not include other work in the contract for the authorized Project without obtaining prior notification from MnDOT that such work is allowed by FHWA. Failure to obtain such notification may result in the loss of some or all of the federal funds for the Project. 5. The City will prepare proposal packages and prepare and distribute any addendums, if needed. 6. The City will receive open, and evaluate proposals. 7. After the proposals are opened, the City will consider the proposals begin negotiations on the price of the Preliminary Engineering in accordance with the practice commonly known as Quality Based Selection. If the proposal contains a goal for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, the City will not award the bid until it has received certification of the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise participation from the MnDOT Equal Employment Opportunity Office. 8. This written consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for performance of the work. Subcontractor agreements must contain all appropriate terms and conditions of this agreement. (MOOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 3 E. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 1. The City will request approval from MnDOT for all costs in excess of the amount of federal funds previously approved for the Project prior to incurring such costs. Failure to obtain such approval may result in such costs being disallowed for reimbursement. 2. The City will prepare reports, keep records, and perform work so as to enable MnDOT to collect the federal aid sought by the City. The City will retain all records and reports in accordance with MnDOT's record retention schedule for federal aid projects. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the Project Engineer will determine 'whether the work will be accepted. F. PAYMENTS. 1. The entire cost of the Project is to be paid from federal funds made available by the FHWA and by other funds provided by the City. The City will pay any part of the cost or expense of the Project that is not paid by federal funds. 2. The City may request partial payments not more than once each thirty (30) days. The Project Engineer will certify each partial payment. 3. The invoice and supplements thereto, will contain all details that may be necessary for a proper audit. Such details will consist of at least the following: (a) A breakdown of labor by individual, classification, dates and hours worked times the applicable rate to arrive at a total dollar amount for each individual. (b) The labor additive shall be applied to total labor dollars. (c) The equipment charges shall be broken down by type of equipment times the applicable rate and dates used to arrive at total equipment charges. (d) A detailed breakdown of outside services used and supporting invoices and documentation that costs of outside services have been paid. (e) Detail for materials, supplies, and other items with the description, units, and unit prices included in the invoice. If materials or supplies are purchased from an outside source, a copy of that invoice should be included. (f) The invoices will include 100% of eligible charges applicable to the Preliminary Engineering so that the prorata share of federal and City participation can be applied to'the total costs. 4. Following certification of the final estimate, the City may request reimbursement for costs eligible for federal funds. The City's request will be made to MnDOT (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 4 and will include a copy of the certified final estimate along with the required records. 5. Reimbursement of costs under this agreement will be based on actual costs. G. LIMITATIONS. 1. The City will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations. 2. Nondiscrimination. It is the policy of the FHWA and the State of Minnesota that no person in the United States will, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance (42. U.S.C. 2000d). Through expansion of the mandate for nondiscrimination in Title VI and through parallel legislation, the proscribed bases of discrimination include race, color, sex, national origin, age, and disability. In addition, the Title VI program has been extended to cover all programs, activities and services of an entity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether such programs and activities are Federally assisted or not. Even in the absence of prior discriminatory practice or usage, a recipient in administering a program or activity to which this part applies, is expected to take affirmative action to assure that no person is excluded from participation in, or is denied the benefits of, the program or activity on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. It is the responsibility of the City to carry out the above requirements. 3. Workers' Compensation. Any and all employees of the City or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required or permitted by the City under this agreement will not be considered employees of MnDOT, and any and all claims that may arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of Minnesota on behalf of said employees, or other persons while so engaged, will in no way be the obligation or responsibility of MnDOT. The City will require proof of Workers' Compensation Insurance from any contractor and sub- contractor. H. AUDIT. 1. The City will comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circular A -133 including amendments and successors thereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 2. As provided under Minnesota Statutes. Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, all books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City are subject to examination by the United States Government, MnDOT, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate, for a minimum of six years. The City will be responsible for any costs associated with the performance of the audit. I. MAINTENANCE. The City assumes full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of any facility constructed or improved under this Agreement. CLAIMS. The City acknowledges that MnDOT is acting only as the City's agent for acceptance and disbursement of federal funds, and not as a principal or co- (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 5 principal with respect to the Project. The City will pay any and all lawful claims arising out of or incidental to the Project including, without limitation, claims related to contractor selection (including the solicitation, evaluation, and acceptance or rejection of bids or proposals), acts or omissions in performing the Project work, and any ultra vires acts. The City will indemnify, defend (to the extent permitted by the Minnesota Attorney General), and hold MnDOT harmless from any claims or costs arising out of or incidental to the Project, including reasonable attorney fees incurred by MnDOT. The City's indemnification obligation extends to any actions related to the certification of DBE participation, even if such actions are recommended by MnDOT.. K. FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT ( FFATA). This Agreement requires the City to provide supplies and /or services that are funded in whole or in part by federal funds that are subject to FFATA. The City is responsible for ensuring that all applicable requirements, including but not limited to those set forth herein, of FFATA are met and that the City provides information to the MnDOT as required. The City shall comply with the following: 1, Reporting of Total Compensation of the City's Executives. (a) The City shall report the names and total compensation of each of its five most highly compensated executives for the City's preceding completed fiscal year, if in the City's preceding fiscal year it received: i. 80 percent or more of the City's annual gross revenues from Federal procurement contracts and Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act, as defined at 2 CFR 170.320 (and subawards); and ii. $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts), and Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act (and subawards); and iii. The public does not have access to information about the compensation of the executives through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (To determine if the public has access to the compensation information, see the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission total compensation filings at httD://WWW.sec.aov/answers/execomp.htm.). Executive means officers, managing partners, or any other employees in management positions. (b) Total compensation means the cash and noncash dollar value earned by the executive during the City's preceding fiscal year and includes the following (for more information see 17 CFR 229.402(c)(2)): Salary and bonus. (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 6 ii. Awards of stock, stock options, and stock appreciation rights. Use the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004) (FAS 123R), Shared Based Payments. iii. Earnings for services under non - equity incentive plans. This does not include group life, health, hospitalization or medical reimbursement plans that do not discriminate in favor of executives, and are available generally to all salaried employees. iv. Change in pension value. This is the change in present value of defined benefit and actuarial pension plans. V. Above - market earnings on deferred compensation which is not tax qualified. vi. Other compensation, if the aggregate value of all such other compensation (e.g. severance, termination payments, value of life insurance paid on behalf of the employee, perquisites or property) for the executive exceeds $10,000. 2. The City must report executive total compensation described above to the MnDOT by the end of the month during which this agreement is awarded. 3. The City will obtain a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and maintain its DUNS number for the term of this agreement. This number shall be provided to MnDOT on the plan review checklist submitted with the plans for each project. More information about obtaining a DUNS Number can be found at: http://fedqov.dnb.com/webform. 4. The City's failure to comply.with the above requirements is a material breach of this agreement for which the MnDOT may terminate this agreement for cause. The MnDOT will not be obligated to pay any outstanding invoice received from the City unless and until the City is in full compliance with the above requirements. DUTIES OF MnDOT. A. ACCEPTANCE. MnDOT accepts designation as Agent of the City for the receipt and disbursement of federal funds and will act in accordance herewith. B. PROJECT ACTIVITIES. 1. MnDOT will make the necessary requests to the FHWA for authorization to use federal funds for the Project, and for reimbursement of eligible costs pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 2. MnDOT will provide to the City copies of the required Federal -aid clauses to be included in the proposal solicitation and will provide the required Federal -aid provisions to be included in the Proposal. 3. MnDOT will review and certify the DBE participation and notify the City when certification is complete. If certification of DBE participation cannot be obtained, then the City must decide whether to proceed with awarding the contract. Failure (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 7 to obtain such certification will result in the project becoming ineligible for federal assistance, and the City must make up any shortfall. C. PAYMENTS. 1. MnDOT will receive the federal funds paid by the FHWA for the Project, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 161.36, Subdivision 2. 2. MnDOT will review and certify each partial pay request. Following certification of the partial estimate, MnDOT will reimburse the City, from said federal funds made available to the Project, for each partial payment request, subject to the availability and limits of those funds. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the City will prepare a final payment request in accordance with the terms of this agreement. MnDOT will review and certify the final payment request with a final audit. 4. No more than 90% of the reimbursement due under this agreement will be paid until completion of the final audit and approval by MnDOT's authorized representative. 5. If MnDOT does not obtain funding from the FHWA or other funding source, or funding cannot be continued at a sufficient level to allow for the processing of the federal aid reimbursement requests, the City may continue the work with local funds only, until such time as MnDOT is able to process the federal aid reimbursement requests. D. AUTHORITY. MnDOT may withhold federal funds, if MnDOT or the FHWA determines that the Project was not completed in compliance with federal requirements. E. INSPECTION. MnDOT, the FHWA, or duly authorized representatives of the state and federal government will have the right to audit, evaluate and monitor the work performed under this agreement. The City will make available all books, records, and documents pertaining to the work hereunder, for a minimum of seven years following the closing of the construction contract. III. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. Each authorized representative will have responsibility to administer this agreement and to ensure that all payments due to the other party are paid pursuant to the terms of this agreement. A. The City authorized representative is Wayne Houle, Edina City Engineer, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN 55424, or his successor. B. MnDOT's authorized representative is Lynnette Roshell, Minnesota Department of Transportation, State Aid for Local Transportation, 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mail Stop 500, St Paul, MN 55155, phone 651 - 366 -3822, or her successor. IV. TORT LIABILITY. Each party is- responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of any others and the results thereof. The Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736, governs MnDOT liability. (MnDOT Agreement No. 00354) Page 8 V. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party will assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this agreement without prior written approval of the other party. VI. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments /supplements to this Agreement must be in writing and be executed by the same parties who executed the original agreement, or their successors in office. VII. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This agreement will be effective upon execution by the City and by appropriate State officials, pVrsuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, and will remain in effect for five (5) years from the effective date or until all obligations set forth in this agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. VIII. TERMINATION. This agreement may be terminated by the City or MnDOT at any time, with or without cause, upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. Such termination will not remove any unfulfilled financial obligations of the City as set forth in this Agreement. In the event of such a termination the City will be entitled to reimbursement for MnDOT- approved federally eligible expenses incurred for work satisfactorily performed on the Project to the date of termination subject to the terms of this agreement. Remainder of this page left intentionally blank. (MnDOTAgreement No. 00354) Page 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused,this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT_ ATION City' certifies that the appropriate person(s) . have executed the contract on its behalf as required by By: applicable resolutions, ordinances, or charter provisions Title: Director State Aid for Local Transportation By: Date: Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION Title: By: Date: By: Date: Title: /r: a 0 REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VI.A. From: Jack Sullivan, PE �� Assistant City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Public Hearing — Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvement BA -385, Resolution No. 2012 -18. ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2012 -18 accepting the feasibility study and approving Countryside Neighborhood Roadway, Improvement No. BA -388, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff initiated this project. The proposed project involves reconstructing the existing roadway, adding or replacing curb and gutter, replacement of the water services, and upgrades to the sanitary and storm sewer systems. The overall project cost is estimated at $1,433,723, which includes City owned utility repairs and replacement. Funding for the roadway cost will be from a special assessment of 100% of the roadway cost. All City owned utility repairs will be from the respective utility funds. The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the Feasibility Study at a special meeting held on January 9, 2012. The ETC is recommending the addition of sidewalk as shown in Figure 3 of page 9 of 12 in the Feasibility Report. Staff has analyzed the feasibility of this sidewalk and determined that the assessable cost per REU would be approximately $1700 due to the topography and site impacts. If the City Council would like to move forward with the sidewalk component Staff would recommend that the public hearing be continued until February 6, 2012 in order to give proper notice due to the sidewalk not being included in the public hearing notice. GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DMPROJECTS\E-APR NOS\BA385 Countryside(2012)\PRELRA DESIGNTEASJEB.IMPUBLIC HEARINGS\Item VIA PH Countryside Res 2012- 18.docx t Staff,. has analyzed the project and feels that' the project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -18 Feasibility Study: BA -385 'Draft Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes from January 9, 2012 and ETC Advisory Communication GAMYTENTRAL SVCSMjG DIVIPROJECTSMOR NOMBA385 Countryside(2012)\PRELIM DESIGNTEASBIUMPUBLIC HEARINMItem VIA PH Counhyside Reg 201Y1S.d. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-18 RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -385 WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council, adopted the 20th day of December, 2011, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA -385, the proposed improvement of Countryside Neighborhood Street Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 17`d day of January, 2012, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: January 17, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted'by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk FEASIBILITY V .�y F ' I hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer unde the,, laws of the State of Minnesota. `- 42375 — (- 1,;2-_ ck D. Sullivan ,, JJ Re /g. No.D Date Approved ��s� / /ij/ 1 v Wayne D. Houle, PE Date Director of Public Works /City Engineer ,l''ir ok a FEASIBILITY STUDY — BA 385 �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT • �ro �t�9. CITY OF EDINA COUTRYSIDE NEIBHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS JANUARY 17, 2012 LOCATION: The Project includes Crescent Drive, Crescent Lane, Highland Road, Hillside Road, Hunter Street, Ridgeway Road and Westridge Boulevard. The drawing below is a detailed project location map of the Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvements (Figure 1). m mm 6001 \550 6610 salt 66w 80pgi '5600 1 600, 5401 mm mot 8006 ■:069 J °°os eooa 6001 NFGRLARD RD — 0008 / 0060 W 0613 0600 0665 0 1 � ( a101 M17 5550,, 80 12 0 mm 6007 0012 6073 �!�etm / 8013 q 6008 ' ./^ 0673 mm 6504 6660 00 ,e 0100 /i� 10610 -I--- —' / 6011 6017 0010 m1z 5306 -5101 ./0109 \��,� RD_IIIER ST _ 6024 0 6021 ODW mat aim ` et�08 j� � e1<$pp�BJO7 etat 6028 9 6101 aim el 12 � ff et6S elm 1 atm 08 % �\+. M17 5104 0104 '9 2 9160 6106 0104 6113 el 15 •. 0700 I a a e1o6 01x7 0121 aloe else � 6104 0701 '01as �� — all 3 0112 a 801 6113 8101 5113 / 6124 8125 0112 0177 ' Bile 6108 e1tt _._ 6117 ; \_ RDGE WAY RD` a122 et to 0121 ... 0160 a a /' I� J C 5712 ° 8 6701 5760 z1 ' / 6170 912 0129 0123 0732 0728 O = 9 A e.•.� , . 0120 r 0133 0120 � 0125 60 61 a a @01 0206 \ \ 0200 0204 elm 0200 8201 R00 0201 .1 j \ 0212 B 8207 EST 02W 0207 .__ 8205 O2� B20B _. __..^\< 0200 0209 9207 1S p ..� 0147 �/T l �- 6212 F� 0600 1 s15 \,moo ' 6210 �� 0211 ezn $i26 8205 `11`0277 am �\ 0220 8227 ozm%\ \ / 0224 m2s 021 1 /0230 am � �o ,�em 6060 mm um ez� 6213 6212 .C„� mm ate, 0232 v7 0293 5307 5306 {II�33 03 ,0 006, 6006 0609 - -- a I 0337 _. 1100 5320 6000 5300 6000 \ 0600 6028 6017 0307 m mm \\ X/ 21 11307 mtt :e3A 25 D 8 mm Y 6327 a 'a a 930 08 0304 a a a a s� mm mm ' 0460 Project Area e Countryside Street Reconstruction Jai- Improvement No: BA -385 n 601." Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 INITIATION & ISSUES: The-. Countryside Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City's street reconstruction program and as identified in the Capital Improvement Program. This project addresses updating aging infrastructure issues associated with the pavement condition, storm water, sanitary sewer and watermain systems. All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, .Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Sidewalk Facilities Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalks facilities and funding options within the City. As shown in Figure 7.10 of Appendix J there are no proposed sidewalk facilities indicated within the project limits. Bicycle Facilities Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed. bicycle facilities within the City as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. As shown in Figure 7.11 of Appendix J there are no bicycle primary or secondary routes indicated within the project limits. Citv of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan The Countryside Neighborhood project is .located within the Nine Mile Creek Watershed district. The Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan indicates two known or modeled storm water issues in the neighborhood. The area on Crescent Drive, between Highland Road and Hunter Street and the area near Valley View Road and Hillside Road will be evaluated for possible mitigation measures. Staff Issues The following are existing features and resident comments that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: ® Surface rainwater drainage thru private yards ® Poor condition of existing pavement ® Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. O Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies • Existing mature trees • Existing lighting • Over -sized Intersections Resident Input As part of the Engineering Departments, practice of notifying residents two years prior to a potential reconstruction project the residents were invited to an Open House on September 20, 2010 and again on September 13, 2011 to discuss the City's process for street reconstruction. This meeting was followed up with a questionnaire sent to the property owners on October 4,, 2011. The questionnaires were completed and Page 2 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 returned by 78 of the 120 property owners, a return rate of 65 %. The -full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix C and D. The two key issues that were addressed in this questionnaire were the addition of new sidewalks and installation of decorative lighting. The responses to those questions are shown in Table 1. COUNTRYSIDE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —. Results from October 4, 2011 Questionnaire Sheet Questionnaires Questionnaires Prefer New Sidewalk Change Existing Sent Returned Lighting Yes No Yes No 120 78 4 73 13 65 % of Returned 65% 5 %* 94 %* 17 %* 83 /o ° * Questionnaires * Percentages are based on responses of returned'questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered on questionnaire. Table 1. Results from Questionnaire A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on October 24, 2011 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was attended by 20 residents representing 17 properties. Input from this. meeting and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in Appendix G and K. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer Historical 'records indicate there have been only a few sewer backups or blockages in the area. The trunk sanitary sewer system has been televised and has been evaluated for areas that will need repair. Watermain The existing watermain system consists of Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) with one stretch of 1 '/2" copper that will be upgraded to a 6" watermain. The system has experienced. relatively few breaks since being installed. The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood and lack the newer STORZ nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. Storm Sewer The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundary of Nine Mile Creek Watershed. Resident questionnaires commented on a few locations of localized surface drainage issues that will be addressed where feasible with sump pump drain pipe. The larger street• network of storm sewer is being reviewed with the help of BARR Engineering to determine if storm sewer upgrades are feasible since the two issues raised in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan stretch well beyond the practical limits of this project. Page 3 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric, communications and cable television utilities are present in the neighborhood. All the utilities are overhead with the exception of the gas lines and some of the communication. Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at.intersections. Streets The majority of the roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the early 1950's. The majority of the neighborhood currently does not have concrete curb and gutter and the roadway widths vary from 26 to 31 feet wide. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood and is in relatively poor condition (Photos 1 & 2). The average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the City of Edina is 51 and the. average PCI for Countryside as calculated in October 2011 is 18. Examples of the raveling and alligator cracking can be seen in photos 1 & 2. The City of Edina recently hired a consultant to evaluate all bituminous roadways within the City. The streets were. graded based on a number of conditions such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling and potholes. Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; with 0 being extremely poor and 100 representing .a brand new road surface. It is the City's practice to complete a total reconstruction of the streets when the PCI is less than 45, a Mill and Overlay project when the PCI is between 45 and 65, and Seal Coats for PCI greater than 65 and less than,95. . Street grades vary widely throughout the area with some areas that are extremely flat allowing storm runoff to collect along the edges of the roadway causing additional deterioration of the pavement. The pavement throughout these streets appears to be near the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement is no longer feasible. Landscaping Some properties have vegetation, hardscapes (such as boulders and retaining walls) or other landscaped items within the City right -of -way. Many of these landscape items are located directly behind the curb or around existing fire hydrants. Some of these landscape items will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary reconstruction work. Page 4 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 1. - Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition Page 5 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The Countryside Neighborhood project involves rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer trunk line, upgrades to the storm sewer system, and upgrades to fire hydrants, construct new concrete curb and gutter, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The trunk sanitary sewer has been televised and based on our preliminary evaluation the trunk sewer will be upgraded by cured -in- place -pipe (CIPP). Staff is reviewing the feasibility of upsizing the segment of sanitary sewer on Hillside Road between Tracy Avenue and Valley View Road from the 9" diameter to 12" diameter to provide additional capacity. Watermain There is an undersized watermain on Hillside Road between Crescent Drive and Valley View Road that will be replaced with a new six inch watermain. The balance of the watermain will remain as is with the exception ,of the gate valves and fire hydrants that will be upgraded. With the large number of teardowns and major remodeling project in the neighborhood, staff is recommending upsizing all the water services from three quarter inch to one inch to provide the recommended flows. Storm Sewer The addition of barrier style B618 concrete curb and gutter is proposed for all streets within the project that currently do not have curb and gutter. The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Installation of sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Private Utilities The local gas utility company, CenterPoint Energy, has indicated that they may upgrade or replace gas mains within the project limits. CenterPoint Energy may also coordinate moving gas meters to the exterior of the homes. This work is not part of the City's project but will be coordinated to occur prior to our construction activities. The other privately utility owners have expressed some interest in upgrading some of their networks within the project limits. Page 6 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 Streets The City is recommending the addition of barrier style concrete curb and gutter on all streets within the project. The project will reconstruct the streets with a bituminous pavement surface. In addition to the new bituminous pavement surface staff is also recommending to tighten up the oversized intersections at: • Crescent Drive and Hillside Road • Crescent Drive and Westridge Boulevard (Southern intersection) • Crescent Drive and Westridge Boulevard (Northern intersection) • Crescent Drive and Highland Road An example of one of the more substantial reductions in the intersection size is at Crescent Drive and Highland Road as shown in figure 2. The pavement at this particular intersection will be reduced from 15,810 square feet to 9,630 square feet. Reconfigurations of these intersection reduces storm water runoff, provides traffic calming and assignment of right -of -way. \ 600' \ O 5500 1 1 \ \ - PROPOSED CURB LINE 00'- 1 \ EXISTING \ EDGE OF ROADWAY -, 5501 \ Figure 2. Intersection Detail at Crescent Dr and Highland Rd Page 7 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 The proposed design acknowledges and addresses many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the engineering and public works staff. Residential Roadway Lighting_ The questionnaire asked if residents wanted to reconstruct the street lights in the project area. The results from Table 1 show that property owners do not want to reconstruct the street lights. The lighting of the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections. Staff is not recommending making any revisions to the current street lighting. Sidewalks At the October 24, 2011 neighborhood informational meeting staff indicated to the residents that sidewalk within the neighborhood was not going to be recommended to Council. The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the proposed reconstruction plan at their November 17 2011 meeting. The ETC had an in depth discussion regarding the need for sidewalk in the neighborhood. The Countryside Neighborhood is within the 0.7 mile walking zone of Countryside School. The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC)" are recommending adding, sidewalk along the following roadways as shown in Figure 3: 9 along Westridge Boulevard and Highland Road from Valley View Road to Tracy Avenue to create a connection from areas east of the Canadian Pacific (CP) rail to Countryside Elementary School. ® along Crescent Drive and up Hillside! Road to access Countryside Park. The proposed ETC recommendation to construct sidewalk in the Countryside Neighborhood has not been communicated to the residents since the ETC meeting was held about a. month after the Countryside Neighborhood Informational Meeting. After gathering the input from the residents and the Edina Transportation Commission staff is not recommending the addition of sidewalk within this project based on not being identified as a location in the City of Edina. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update and the overwhelming negative neighborhood responses. Page 8 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 HIGHLAIID RD MITER ST 0 O °J 4 G U U RIDGE WAY RD a � g W Q OLHI GER BLVD y W ci CREST L11 } O� ¢ �O t OQ` a` a4' AI,{ o� Figure 3. Sidewalk Proposed by Transportation Commission Page 9 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way for Crescent Drive, Crescent Lane, Highland Road, Hillside Road, Hunter Street, Ridgeway road and Westridge Boulevard is 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $2,833,725 (Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from start of project to final assessment hearing. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. The estimated roadway construction cost is $1,433,725 and will be 100 percent funded by special assessments. The new concrete curb and gutter is included under the storm sewer fund not under the roadway special assessment. Utility improvements and repairs amount to $1,400,000 and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Item Amount Total Cost Roadway: $1,433,725 Roadway Total: $ 1,433,725 Utilities: Storm Sewer $ 530,000 Watermain $ 470,000 Sanitary Sewer $ 400,000 Utility Total: $ 1,400,000 Total Project: $ 2,833,725 Table 2. Estimated Proiect Costs ASSESSMENTS: The assessments are based on the City's Special assessment policy, dated September 7, 2010. Based on this policy there are 116 residential equivalent units (REU); six of the properties are shown as a 1/3 REU's. The estimated assessment per REU is $12,360. (Figure 4) Page 10 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 1 e000 cool %0, 5520 5519 5512 6091 � 5491 6009 6004 B906 ; _ 05 ! 9004 0000 ,T HIf,HLAIID RD eO0 0006 6008 01 5617 5613 6608 8805 66 - -- 9012 0009'- 80,3 9004 8012 05 c,- 9010 5612 600'. 00 17 • 90n 9912 BD05 IUM117IR ST ■ ■ ■i �p 9018 9020 ■ 0021 8009 y81 5113 01 0039 ■ 8101 B 8 s - --8105 0 9100 9109 100 dt' 6117 81041 : 9104 `9 8100 6105 8109 8105 8113 r 8,04 81 9,21 6108 ■ 8108 n 8104 6109 ■ 0108 6121 6113 6112 11 0100 8113 8117 91 6125 61 • 8113 0108 _ I'- 8117 ■ 8118 5112 RIDGEWAY RD t 8117 `_ 9129 81 -1 . 9120 „� J 5712 �' 5704 5700 9119 m ■ 8124 ry 6121 5137 6123 9128 8132 8 W 9133 81 W i 8178 � �' 3 o 0 ■ 8263 MOO 6200 i 8201 �� 8208 9201 62 o V 1 0 8201 ■ 9204 9212 1 -R EST LII. 0206 8205 �' "� • 8208 a 8209 82'01 92_ 82� •: ■ 0212 8209 8218 �e. 9208 15 9217 8213 ■ 83� 53 9206 i�` 17 ■K 8220 6221 8240 'AQ �1 ` 19 0,160 @p 6225 �h 6209 6300 8228 ■ 9239 X40 " -- 6223 838 6279 8213 0232 i �FbG 27 8250 9301 ` 82 ■ _ 18233 8301 8305 Z 0304 0305 0 B30320 0309 ■ e324 e324 8300 ■ 8308 0328 9317 C307 83 8300 ' 8308 1 ~ -•1 21 8304 L63 8312 8313 255 g g 38 8308 Preliminary Assessments ' 116-" 9327 9330 v - $ 113 REU 9344 $ 1 REU oe S h e3 Preliminary Assessments Countryside Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -385 E^ctoer, 20ept Oa6er, 2011 Figure 4. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 11 of 12 MW 5999 5819 5813 701 8812 5815 PROJECT LIMITS 1 08 a S S 195412 5408 5912 5D 5917 5816 N ^ o y O O N N N O 5409 5a,s 20 1 e000 cool %0, 5520 5519 5512 6091 � 5491 6009 6004 B906 ; _ 05 ! 9004 0000 ,T HIf,HLAIID RD eO0 0006 6008 01 5617 5613 6608 8805 66 - -- 9012 0009'- 80,3 9004 8012 05 c,- 9010 5612 600'. 00 17 • 90n 9912 BD05 IUM117IR ST ■ ■ ■i �p 9018 9020 ■ 0021 8009 y81 5113 01 0039 ■ 8101 B 8 s - --8105 0 9100 9109 100 dt' 6117 81041 : 9104 `9 8100 6105 8109 8105 8113 r 8,04 81 9,21 6108 ■ 8108 n 8104 6109 ■ 0108 6121 6113 6112 11 0100 8113 8117 91 6125 61 • 8113 0108 _ I'- 8117 ■ 8118 5112 RIDGEWAY RD t 8117 `_ 9129 81 -1 . 9120 „� J 5712 �' 5704 5700 9119 m ■ 8124 ry 6121 5137 6123 9128 8132 8 W 9133 81 W i 8178 � �' 3 o 0 ■ 8263 MOO 6200 i 8201 �� 8208 9201 62 o V 1 0 8201 ■ 9204 9212 1 -R EST LII. 0206 8205 �' "� • 8208 a 8209 82'01 92_ 82� •: ■ 0212 8209 8218 �e. 9208 15 9217 8213 ■ 83� 53 9206 i�` 17 ■K 8220 6221 8240 'AQ �1 ` 19 0,160 @p 6225 �h 6209 6300 8228 ■ 9239 X40 " -- 6223 838 6279 8213 0232 i �FbG 27 8250 9301 ` 82 ■ _ 18233 8301 8305 Z 0304 0305 0 B30320 0309 ■ e324 e324 8300 ■ 8308 0328 9317 C307 83 8300 ' 8308 1 ~ -•1 21 8304 L63 8312 8313 255 g g 38 8308 Preliminary Assessments ' 116-" 9327 9330 v - $ 113 REU 9344 $ 1 REU oe S h e3 Preliminary Assessments Countryside Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -385 E^ctoer, 20ept Oa6er, 2011 Figure 4. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 11 of 12 Feasibility Study Countryside Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -385 January 17, 2012 PROJECT SCHEDULE: FEASIBILITY: APPENDIX: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Project Open House 2010 September 20, 2010 Project Open House 2011 September 13, 2011 Neighborhood Informational Meeting October 24, 2011 Council Orders Public Hearing December 20, 2011 Receive Feasibility Report and Public Hearing January 17, 2012 Bid Opening March /April 2012 Award Contract Spring 2011 Begin Construction Spring 2012 Complete Construction Fall 2012 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2013 Staff believes the construction of this project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to improve the public infrastructure in the Countryside Neighborhood. A. 2010 Open House Meeting Letter and Presentation B. 2011 Open House Meeting Letter and Presentation C. Property Owners Questionnaire D. Property Owners Questionnaire Results E. Informational Meeting Letter F. Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentation G. Attendance List and Public Comment H. Recommendation to Set Public Hearing, Notice of Public Hearing to residents and Notice of Public Hearing Advertisement I. Preliminary Assessment Roll J. City Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities (Fig. 7.10 and 7.11) K. Resident Correspondence L. Edina Transportation Commission Review Data and Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 12 City of Edina September 7, 2010 RE: 2012 Street, Reconstruction Projects Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2012 for your neighborhood. The first step is to have an open house to familiarize you with the City's process for street reconstruction. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on Monday, September 20, 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, see attached map on the back. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special Assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000. To prepare for the meeting, please review the enclosed brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ". Also, for additional information on our Street Reconstruction process visit our website at http: / /www.CityOfEdina.com/ FutureProjects. Please contact Assistant City Engineer, Jack Sullivan if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend and would like more information on the process. Jack can be reached at isull_iv_an(@ci.edina.mn.us or 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer G:\Engheering\ Infrastructure \Streets\Pavement Management \Neighborhood Reconstruction Program\2011 And 2012 Street Recon\2012 Open House Letter.Doc City (Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 0 �c J J a w 70rH Sr 0 0 W 74TH ST I O �y New Public Works / Building / W 76TH ST EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD - - - - -, W 70TH ST W 77TH ST City of Edina ^�� New Public Works Building a� 7450 Metro Blvd " Edina, MN 55439 W S E D J fn Z J � N E- Ui� 2 W 74TH ST I O �y New Public Works / Building / W 76TH ST EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD - - - - -, W 70TH ST W 77TH ST City of Edina ^�� New Public Works Building a� 7450 Metro Blvd " Edina, MN 55439 W S E OPEN HOUSE lfeT, Neighborhood Roadway Improvements 2011 and 2012 I TYPICAL TIMELINE FROM FIRST NOTIFICATION TO END OF CONSTRUCTION August Kick -off informational letter to residents Mid - September Open House (for preceding two years) Mid - October/ November Neighborhood informational meeting – detailed project plans and estimated cost are provided December I January Feasibility report and public hearing January / February I March Plan Preparation / Bidding April I May Construction starts October/ November Construction finishes Spring Warranty work Summer / Fall Final Assessment Hearing 3 FUNDING Special Assessment pays 100% of the following (approximately $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU): • Roadway - replacing entire roadbed • Sidewalks • Decorative Streetlights (optional) • Traffic Management (optional) 5 AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions 2 PROCESS FROM START TO END END START c.,�e Mw .n cowed a,mrmi� J, ra F�tituFib�y P1w P bbc drMed. lU'vind AAviue R..­' f bid. �f•J farcJ CwxJ vJm a dcfu�® a eounat relects — Rim t••iat woiect. Protect goes r1Or"� to the bo-m of 15 -30 d y.. :cnee�ie FUNDING The Utility Fund which covers sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main pays 100% of the following: Curb 8 Gutter Sanitary Sewer — trunk pipe only in the roadway Storm Sewer — trunk pipe in roadway and in easement on private property • Water main — trunk pipe in roadway up to the curb stop of private property Sump Pump Pipe — for residents to connect sump pumps WHAT DO YOUR TAXES PAY FOR? Allocation The Portion of Your Property Tax • Police that the City Receives Our first contact with you is when we inform you of the informational meeting, followed by public hearings notification; of Edine 2 °% • Fire •Parks Pay mere • Public works 0 City of Edina communication to you is the notice of final special assessment 0 Omer Snowplowing tlox DO. paymerd $0,000 to Pay 25% $12,000 min Pothole Repairs Payable .- Seal coating 014 to year Other Street 10 years wwrry Maintenance r 91 1 Weekly construction updates will be sent via the "City Extra" email. Stay in the loop by signing up for this free service. Letters maybe delivered to inform you of time - sensitive events such as water shutoff the next moming. 7 RESIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE The property owners questionnaire generally gathers information on the following topics: Sump Pump Discharge Service Line — do you have one and the location? Residential Roadway Lighting — do you want decorative street lights, style and pole location? Pedestrian Issues — what are the issues and do you favor sidewalk? Private Underground Utilities —do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? Local Drainage Problems — have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? " %1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS — PAYMENT COMMUNICATING WITH YOU OPTIONS Our first contact with you is when we inform you of the informational meeting, followed by public hearings notification; Z. house; surveys; project plans and schedules; and Pay mere onstruction update letters via regular mail. Our last mount by communication to you is the notice of final special assessment riov 30 hearing. DO. paymerd $0,000 to Pay 25% $12,000 min r Public bearings will be published in the Edina Sun- Current Payable .- Questionnaires will be sent during the early planning stage to 014 to year help staff fornulate a decision in areas such as street lighting 10 years wwrry and style of street lighting. 91 1 Weekly construction updates will be sent via the "City Extra" email. Stay in the loop by signing up for this free service. Letters maybe delivered to inform you of time - sensitive events such as water shutoff the next moming. 7 RESIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE The property owners questionnaire generally gathers information on the following topics: Sump Pump Discharge Service Line — do you have one and the location? Residential Roadway Lighting — do you want decorative street lights, style and pole location? Pedestrian Issues — what are the issues and do you favor sidewalk? Private Underground Utilities —do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? Local Drainage Problems — have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? " %1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS — PAYMENT OPTIONS A final special assessment \ Pay mere heanng is held Ile fall aNer mount by the project is completed riov 30 (sometimes one year later) DO. paymerd $0,000 to Pay 25% $12,000 min W-65 Payable .- yin. 014 to year aid 10 years wwrry Wait Rol mgr! �Fnal assessment am uo nl� amor6dba are determined al that time, yon \ but cannot exceed 10% of P oWty' cues pending assessment. HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT AND STAY INFORMED? •— .CityofEdina.com Visit our website regularly. Information from open houses and other communications are archived on our website. • edinamail aci.edma.com Drop us an email •952 -826 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00 -3:30 p.m. • Stop by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7450 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952-826 -0371 10 j . BOULEVARD AREAS Property owner items located within the City's right of way may be damaged during construction: • Irrigation and pet containment systems will only be restored if indicated on the resident questionnaire. • Prior to construction, residents will be given an opportunity to remove plantings and other landscape features in the boulevard. • Boulevards will be restored with grass — regardless of previous planting or 12 WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • That the City will keep you informed of activities • Private utility companies updating their systems prior to City's contractor • Dusty, noisy, muddy (watering trucks will help to keep dust down) • May be asked to limit water use May be connected to temporary water WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PREPARE FOR THE PROJECT? • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification 5 �p WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • Irrigation system and pet containment may be damaged • May not be able to access your driveway for up to seven days • May not be able to access the roadway for a few hours • Contractor will accommodate special needs THANK YOU 0 §. . .. e j �{ . . § . ,`!!oleo ! } } »/t ~[° , TTOZ � �f f!t � � E \(� 4 �;� ®��, / G ^ [ } - e. \) O e t� U) �y a ,ACOflPoMS�� August 30, 2011 RE: 2012 Street Reconstruction Projects Dear Resident: City of Edina Last fall you were notified that the City of Edina initiated the process of street and utility improvements for your neighborhood for the summer of 2012. At the same time you were also invited to an open house to learn more about the process. Once again, you are invited to attend a similar open house on Tuesday, September 13, 7:00 p.m., at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." Please keep in mind that this meeting will not cover project specific details, that meeting will come at a later time. The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $6,000 to $9,000. For additional information on our street reconstruction process please see our brochure at http:// www. cityofedina.com /FutureProiects. To better communicate the overall happenings of the project, the City has introduced the City Extra e -mail notification service. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e -mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /citvextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to your neighborhood project name (Countryside). Please contact the City at 952 -927- 8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 If you cannot attend the open house and have questions on the process please contact either Assistant City Engineer Jack Sullivan at 952 - 826 -0445 or email at Sullivan @ci.edina.mn.us or Project Manager Jamie Cynor at 952 - 826 -0440 or email jcynor@ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer cc: City Council Edina Transportation Commission 9/13/2011 OPEN HOUSE for 2012 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions PROCESS FROM START TO END Kick -off informational letter to residents �nrnl 6 of Intrr E`wlu.l° �D° END START M1ood,N°- sl detailed project plans and estimated . ..rcJ. F °NYn ,baflot Ilevinr A�I.vius Re�Jen� fir dJi rd It Councll rejecls a project It goes to the bottom of 15 -20 year schedule,. 0 kill: 17e1:tM47 M:I =1;1:w • For Engineering staff to communicate to residents the reconstruction process directed by Council • Staff is not here to debate the process but rather to educate and to gather input from residents • Council determines if a street reconstruction project proceeds z TYPICAL TIMELINE FROM FIRST NOTIFICATION TO ENO OF CONSTRUCTION August Kick -off informational letter to residents Mid - Seplember Open House (for preceding two years) Mid - October / November Neighborhood informational meeting - detailed project plans and estimated cost are provided December / January Feasibility report and public hearing January / February / March Plan Preparation / Bidding April / May Construction starts October / November Construction finishes Following Spring Warranty work Following Summer / Fall Final Assessment Hearing a AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions 6 FUNDING Special Assessment pays 100% of the following (approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU): • Roadway - replacing entire roadbed • Sidewalks • Decorative Streetlights (optional) • Traffic Management (optional) AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions 3 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS — PAYMENT Allocation OPTIONS A linal special assessment hearing is held the tall alter Pay enllre amh unt the project is completed Nov 30 (sometimes one year later). 5. Dater $6,000 to Pay 25% in. payment $9,000 Balance rolls Il over65 Paoyeble to yow yrs. old er 70 years pro pes Seal coating tapes • Other Street Ron entire Maintenance 0 amount to your property Ones n FUNDING The Utility Fund which covers sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main pays 100% of the following: • Curb & Gutter (will be added or may be replaced) Sanitary Sewer - trunk pipe only in the roadway Storm Sewer - trunk pipe in roadway and in easement on private property Water main - trunk pipe in roadway up to the curb stop of private property • Sump Pump Pipe - for residents to connect sump pumps 3 WHAT DO YOUR TAXES PAY FOR? AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Allocation The Portion of Your Property Tax • Police that the City Receives •Fire I '0Edoa '" • Parks 5. • Public Works D C,ty of Edina What can I do to prepare for the project? ao% 13 Snowplowing Pothole Repairs Seal coating • Other Street Maintenance 0 AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions COMMUNICATING WITH YOU Our first contact with you Is when we Inform you of the Informational meeting, followed by public hearings Wr notification; open house; surveys; project plans and schedules; and construction update letters via regular mall. Our last communication to you Is the notice of final special assessment hearing. SPIN ° Public hearings will be published In the Edina Sun- Current Questionnaires will be sent during the early planning stage to help staff formulate a decision In areas such as street lighting and style of street lighting. Weekly construction updates will be sent via the "City ® Extra' email. Slay In the loop by signing up for this free service. E 4m Letters may be delivered to Inform you of time - sensitive =- events such as water shut -off the next morning. RESIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE The property owners questionnaire generally gathers Information on the following topics: • Sump Pump Discharge Service Line - do you have one and the location? • Residential Roadway Lighting- do you want decorative street lights, style and pole location? • Pedestrian Issues - what are the issues'and do you favor sidewalk? • Private Underground Utilities - do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? • Local Drainage Problems - have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? 1s WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • That the City will keep you informed of activities • Private utility companies updating their systems prior to City's contractor • Dusty, noisy, muddy (watering trucks will help to keep dust down) • May be asked to limit water use m '�'a=.� HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT AND STAY INFORMED? • www.CityofEdlna.com Visit our webslte regularly. Information from open houses and other communications are archived on our webslte. • edlnamall(acl.edlna.com Drop us an email • 952 - 626 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00.3:30 p.m. • Stop by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7450 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952 - 826.0371 14 f1) AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions 1e WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • Irrigation system and pet containment may be damaged. The irrigation system will not be fixed until the end of the project. • Prior to construction, residents will be given an opportunity to remove plantings and other landscape features in the boulevard. • Boulevards will be restored with grass - regardless of previous planting or landscaping. 1171 WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • May be connected to temporary water WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • May not be able to access the roadway for a few hours. Some days it may not be accessible by vehicle. Contractor will accommodatespecial needs. 11121 *' WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PREPARE FOR THE PROJECT? • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification 23 WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • May not be able to access your driveway for up to seven days . ; . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions I THANK YOU 24 � � � §� :«s / Property O \f\u \^)�is \ }z 2\ �t� \ w� ! . \) /!;lam ;K }': October 4, 2011 RE: 2012 Countrvside Improvements - Resident Questionnaire City of Edina Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2012 for your neighborhood. The first step was to hold an open house on September 13, for you to become familiar with the process. Things to know and consider: Residents pay a portion of the overall', project cost in the form of a special assessment. A typical special assessment ranges from $6,000 to $9,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and is payable over 10 years. The estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2013. Components of a project vary and are based on questionnaire responses. The special assessment typically includes cost of new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special assessed. Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the same year. The next step is to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The information you share with us is essential in determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. This information will be discussed at the project informational meeting scheduled for October 24. The following information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed is attached to the back of this letter. After reading this letter completely, please complete the questionnaire and return by October 18, in the self - addressed stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection Do you use a sump pump or have you considered installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. If a sump drain system is installed you could connect to it; however, the line from your house to the City sump drain would be your responsibility, including any plumbing modifications needed to connect. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 2012 Countryside Improvements - Resident'Questionnaire Page 2 of 3 A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner's lawn. This can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor's lawn, your basement if your lawn drains back to your home or with the street if the sump pump constantly runs down the gutter line promoting algae growth. Discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system using floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both by City Ordinance and State Statute. If the topography and. final street designs favor a City sump drain system we will need to know if you currently have a sump pump or a footing drain. The City sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. We also would like to know about any local drainage problems.. This , might be an opportunity for the sump drain system to correct these issues. II. Local Drainage Problems Does storm water run -off stand in the street or sidewalk in front of your house? As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if this or similar. situations are occurring in your' area. If so, please describe it in the local drainage problems section of the questionnaire. We will review for possible corrective action. III. Private Underground Utilities Some residents install private underground utilities in. the City owned boulevards, also called the right -of -way (ROW). These utilities are usually lawn irrigation or pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged, they will be restored only if you indicate that you have these systems on your returned questionnaire in the private underground utilities section. Additionally, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, they can attempt to avoid damaging them during construction. IV. Residential Streetlights As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents favor upgrading their streetlight system. In some cases, the streetlight system is at the end of its useful life and requires upgrading. We do not know yet the condition of your specific streetlight system; an evaluation will be done later 'on. Funding for streetlights are currently through special assessment. The typical cost is approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU or, per property. In the residential streetlight option section of the questionnaire are examples of the different styles of streetlighting that could be installed in your neighborhood. Please rank your style preferences. Please note that ranking your style preferences does not mean you are in favor of streetlights. V. Pedestrian Issues As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks in the neighborhood. Funding for sidewalks is split between special assessment, City of Edina and the Edina School District (if the sidewalk falls within a school walking zone). The typical cost to add a couple blocks -of sidewalks to a multi - block area is $300 -$600 per REU or, per property. \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA385 Countryside (2012)\PR ELI M DESIGN \INFO MTG \BA -385 Survey- Letter.doc 2012 Countryside Improvements — Resident Questionnaire Page 3 of 3 If you know of a problem at a pedestrian crossing, missing sidewalk or other pedestrian issues please tell us about it in that section of the questionnaire. VI. Traffic Management The Edina Transportation Commission typically reviews traffic issues on local streets. We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues. Please tell us about it in the traffic management section of the questionnaire. Receive Project Updates via City Extra If you sign up for our "City Extra" e -mail notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. During feasibility study preparations, such updates are usually notifications of upcoming meetings. Later, if the Council chooses to proceed with construction of this project, the updates will occur weekly. During construction, the updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited or when to have your contractor repair your private lawn irrigation system if it was ,damaged by construction activities. The "City Extra" is our best form of communication with you. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /cityextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to this project's name, "Countryside Street Reconstruction" Please contact the City at 952 - 927 -8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. Questions If you have questions after reading this letter, please contact either Assistant City Engineer Jack Sullivan at 952 - 826 -0445 or email at jsullivan @ci.edina.mn.us or Project Manager Jamie Cynor at 952- 826 -0440 or email jcynor @ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Property Owner's Questionnaire Self- Addressed Stamped Envelope \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA385 Countryside(2012) \PRELIM DESIGN \INFO MTG \BA -385 Survey_Letter.doc MCI] 6004 8003 FJJ 17 80 t2 6018 0021 5105 J~ 6104 01 6113 6109 81013 5712 5704 57017 9919 5701 PROJECT LIMITS �� � 1 _;2F0 5903 g 5312 5315 h 5 �� 1� �� �� I„ I � 1 R 1 2141 ■ ■ I w ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■wa �- -io 25. 6000 6001 5520 {5518 5512 5508 55041 5500'11 8001 }I — 8004 6005 no 5804 6005 HIGHLAIID RD — 6009 f3o 5808 8101 5617 5513 5509 5505 , 8012 6013 ___ -- 8013 6105 ` .' 9112 5508 X04 5600 I •_ 6016 _ ~8100 f 5518 — — _ + 6017 �� — l P+ l _ HUIITER S_T ## 6101 ` = 6104 � — —T� , — -- 4 -- 8027) : '• / 8009 l" ' 8108 y` x 8113 � 5509 I 5501 6101 15 1 8109 8112 ,,• 8105 100% .... r 6117 6104 8116r -- 6109 8105 8104 i 812D '} 8121 6103 6109 8117 8121 x8124 r 6125 8112 l dl 13 t. _ . � • � •„ 8117 6112 �- RIDGE4VAY RD 6117 / _ --T - -f 5.1 8129 Clio p� 8121 8118 f I i m (- 6120 8124 8128 16132 'I 612'3 u.l i �F 8121 I r,? 6133 612} ' 6125 8201 �`. 1~203 6204 1 6201] 1— 8201 � 6201 8 X12 CREST LII I 6208 f 02M I 6205 / 6201 �- C201v • �(� tr�8213 8209 1 am 041 6215 18217 ^213 . i d'� B20B 1 / 6iC0 L} )e213 '•.5tn�` 8217` F p ti 6212 .' 6221 � I mot. 02� (6228 1 :{ , 5212 5l< ��' 82217 8301 r 3C0 K241 1, 6229 6318 6233 `, • -- - b237 it 6333 8305 n304 8305 000 8324 f 6309 5303 �ti, S . 6309 6329 1 21 10313 23 83 8312 25 6377 8219 e.3o0 8223 CS \13 s 6301 Project Area Countryside Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -385 6024 6100 9903 6104 913 9912 � 8112 6118 °917 5316 6120 2 r) q7 I N 6124 c� � 2=7 5020 6200 620i h 5401 8000 6245 8004 6209 " 8008 6212 -- 5 �3 _ 53 63216 8012 6221 n, 5225 M — 6024 6100 6104 3 81 Ct4 � 8112 6118 6120 2 r) q7 I N 6124 c� � 6128 — 6200 620i h 6120 — 6245 6203 6209 " 6212 -- 5 �3 _ 53 63216 6220 6221 n, 5225 M — 6224 6228 62�9 r 6232 8304 8 ?013 e� h In L7 6300 8403 M� II Engineering Dept Fugust.2011 �e PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE ° 0 2012 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EDINA Please do not answer these questions until after you have read the entire newsletter. Please complete and return this survey by October 18, using the self- addressed stamped - envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? O Yes O No OUnknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? O Yes O No OUnknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump O Yes O No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains O Yes O No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location and approximately where along the right -of —way (ROW) line you would like the service connection pipe located. LINE HOUSE EXAMPLE GARAGE HOUSE SERVICE OCONNECTION PIPE HERE ROW CU__RB ______LINE ----------------------- II. Local Drainage Problems — please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City's right -of -way? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) O Yes O No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way? i O Yes O No IV Residential Streetlights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a special assessment cost of approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU)? 71 Yes O No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being most liked. Please answer even if you answered "No" in section IV. A. Acorn: Coach: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope from Valley View Rd to South View Ln, neighborhood, just north of Edina City Edina. Hall, Edina. Dislike 0 0 0 O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 Arlington Lantern: Style can be viewed in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 501h St along Wooddale Ave, Edina. Dislike 0 0 0 0 0 Like 1 2 3 4 5 V. Pedestrian Issues: Dislike O 13 0 0 0 Like 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 101 and W 78"' St North, Maple Grove. Dislike 0 0 0 O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood? 0 Yes B. If Yes, Where? E U• C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? ® Yes O No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? Thank you for your cooperation. Please return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped - envelope. Please complete all questions and return to the City of Edina by October 18. APPENDIX D Property Owners Questionnaire Results Data Entered By: Susan Waack Last Date Data Entered: Oct 21, 2011 Due Date: Oct 18, 2011. Questionnaires Sent Out: 120 Questionnaires; Returned: 78 ' Percent',Returned:. 66% ' COUNTRYSIDE[NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTON 1 2012 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIRE 'IMPROVEMENT NO. BA 385 Sump Pump Discharge Service Line Drainage Private Underground Utilities ' Residential Roadway L I ghting Option Pedestrian Issues Traffic Management Willing to Connect [Willing to Connect Inggation sys. In et containment Favors pgrading ;; Sidewalk Draintile or Footin Drain Has Sump Pump to Citv Drain Roof Drains - Local Drainage Problems blvd. system Street Li hts Preferred Styles Need Returned Arlington K o n ADDRESS Survey Yes -' No ' Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Yes No Yes No Atom Coach , Lantem Later 'Yes No Construct new sidewalks where? S ec ific N'hood Pedestrian Comments Yes No If. es where? House # Street Name - � r r , r J ti x. ,- � .r , I a > t1„ n I_- _ 1- t L 3 . I ..5 5r. .._ _, 3. 1� s _ z�. _ I _ 6117. Ridgeway Rd 9 Y 1 1' 1. 1. 1 1 1 1 3 4, 2 1 ., ; 1 ,.. ,.. ! •1.� k ,.. .�, ., _ r , _ ,. > a .. d trr ,_ r, _.r _ rr ,. �. .. ,..- , . r _.,.. ,,.: 4. _ ,.. ..a„i .-: :u , r . l I. L . _ , �., • . .,- _.. .f-. . r r :. r. water Dols In our erd from net hbors _... P _. Y .- __. 3, .. . , :- .._. i r r w r - t - t • rG ,. .. .. , _ , ,. ". �. t . > -= r _ :, t ,. ,. .•- .' .'rt; >"„ ,v .. � .r,• -. c r - , .s .., .: utter and drelna a water F t >. __.- ..a' -F P,S v , Lt p. ,t > e: -'... L ?':� t: ....�,e- c, �. Y•.. k. "a. q. --E' z 6132 R d ewa Rd r iY p sa I s. I i - -. _..._. _ s. .. __ b -._.. �7.. {L .+, � _ .. __r,�, .�_n�._r s. a ... •_. «., me awn ,_ ..,.. -.., �-.,. ,....., ., _.__. _ ,. -- _., ., E_,_.. i';_rv.._ ! ..,i.r_> r.1. ,_� , e� -, 5' 1 x1•'J r :.na aJr 2, -c ti - 6228 Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 4 2 1 • 1. i., 1:J, -i t. l hombledrene _ ..• ., _ 1_ , L', t f. t. -. -.. -, _,..a. ., $ ",. , .< r, /, _. I . ". .,.,... ,, ., _ 1 •, c ._, .._ .x.. ., ... -.., ... >.,. 1- ., r _ ,_... e m sum worked .- > _ ..,.,... .- .. t} - - 3 S _,._ -�, .. _ .r a ,. .•.. , M � , _ ,.. f.. a •.,,,. _ ,. ,,, , _. z ,,, s ,.,. r �`'� _ t <, �. ,.. _ .. , , , n W scan all summer on a co let,: .. _ nY .. . b uP , . _ �a -'z _ _ i. ,_'� _ z ,. ,., .., ¢` , .�,„. -,r .-,- r. , ,,, � -t: 4. r. u ,.�_ -. I �,. existin' �fi lits'a finelriewli�titsS re _ -, - t"E . t.'• - : L _.- _„ ",,_,,,. .:. ,. ___, -.,,_ .-5;t _.., r- _..,._n.., Et .__„ .. ,_._�... u„ __ ,_,,.._ ,- 1_.,� -,,.._ u..,•x da , ...r_- e,. =:,, •, z_ .. ., .. _.. r inches soli then all da r .. Y.. , . =mo-,_,. _,_ ., .. -_, ..__ ,�- .,_.___.- ., h . -_.;yS _ � r: ,_.;.ls , _ , r_u__:a - _, ...,_. _.�.. [. . •" - ,�..FT„r - ..._.. i• r_, _,+., ,x._ki .1. f ._, •^:2 waste'of'nrone I c I j 1 going fromHillside to Tracy is terrible, especially with the ??? Project going on, also baseball games at the park all the 6213 Hillside Rd .. 1 1 1 1 1 DON'T NEED NEW ROADSI 1 1 . 1 5 1 WE DON'T NEED SIDEWALKS 1 time -they park on our street all the time .. ,. ,. .- - - Y _ T_.. , . , _ ...d. ,- � ,f.. 5 -, .><•n. ,- ,., l _ �.. ., _- _ - � •z^ r - c .. .:- x. r. ( - R > 75, . w . 4 1. '.j , .a ,-�i 2 ,. > >. r.. ,. �.. ,. - , ... `t. 'ter. .•> „ ._ .. .. , e F•, v..... . r -+ .. _ e _ ., , „x ..Yr , . .� �__, .. r- st E _ "}•.,_ . � iztr . .ia sT, ,Z, ,, mss- _ ,z r `there Is anove own'blind'cunr`e In - r9._ ,� - a f ti r. •,t .7a^ ;,.. i. i- r -zh J � • ate.: ,F ` 4,• • x stormdremnearo rd e a r .. u m b dcsl n :. •, .�� .•. � f [< C . ._ a _,. ., ., �".;; r .', T_ ». tt ._ c � :. `�_ kk _ t» , ,.. i ;:. s :: v ,r r e '• front`ofOlJf�011$emakn d • { d n' a erousfor� edestdan and• 1 - r „�. Cr E .� � •,[, .. _. r f f 5 •,. ..e , � .. ., „ .. r?, .. . _r. , Crescent Dr ,, ., _ ,. ,e' . _ , , , � .t � r r 4 r ,..r �. r . -._ _,_ •: ..r .. - •,,. . _- F t+-• : i t e r - ,PAP_ - 9 - .�•�, _.., 6013 _ _ 'r .. , v. ... . _.. ,, -... , �,3..r .,, .. x , _. . - .. 1, _, t, . r,.., .v .. _ a b .: � 1 C f:s /4 ". .. 7t. L. ... ._ • s - Y _o ,. ... 5x ,� s .. 1 ..._ _ �,, : N ,. y -L�ti ,... , _ -_. _. tiS... ._ �. , , , _ ..-_,_ _s ., . ., ,. . -. 1, e, a. __. •1. � -. .Aa,-= -" 4. , .,. sx 1.. .. t.,.- ._.,,: also o I al end of diive n rnelt/rein P.e [�.. - -,._. _R,. _ s. -� � °2 r .1" 9 9 sr 6201 _ Crest Ln „ : :" - . _ ... ,. ., ., �f..- , , r , _ n ..a .. ... �� -._., ,. r F ,. .. , <.. a ... ,. k. , �, , .. , a.. ... .,,v ZI, , .. .. �_. � .-. ., [' H. _ .5'1 r.,•t, ... _ _ , •... _ •4e• _ r £ }i' .1 't o-,`•rn . .r "'_'fv r; ..�. =a f: . ^:ar,r x '` �- 'iF•F' . - 1*-. S f.. -a'4. - ,vys :: ^.. -�z. .t, _... .s.r -e ,._. _ ..n e. _.. ,. ♦ ,,. _� r .. _.. Y. ..._ ..s ..,, a > 7 .. _. r .. ,. _ .. .. _ r ._ .. .. ,.. i r ,.. .v . ,. ,. .. :�. ., ,._ r. .e! .:� •F i �q.. &..r ..I E s '�7.' _t t„ .%7^ r' -C' -• 7 621 c. I. ,._._.- ,. Cr scent Dr ,_ •. _ _..... -_.� _eIJ.... .. , _ __. .. _- _..tea _. _.., .. ,, . ".r_.- a>- _. " A. ,._ ... " _ .. _ _....�.., .. I, . � .w,. _,a _ . ,_!- l.. > �: -_, ., "c. ., a 5-,_ r__ P„ - -, s_ ar'i•... -_� ...iii -J. w1 . -....� ,...4 v._�,.. .-- ...._.., � ti ,_..rra... i`.. .:,L.�, r - 'L',` -al t_.. 7... ..r_•,- r'.�il Thick biirsh/shrubs at intersections; hard to 6235 Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 see'around curves ' Hillside and - , •. .... . S.J.. .-_ ,.. ._.. .!.r , d e _ .r_ ,__ ,. ,.. ., �. .. .,.. .._ ,: I. 4 1 t ! Rd Crescent inteisectlon Is'' t _ ` 6221 _ __ ,,,.> _•:_.,_ <,.�_ _... _. ,, >,-. _.�... _.s__ r... _.. __. 1....C._.S .>_.•C._,4 ly.r ,.- ._.... k. <__._, ra _.___. _ , ,.. i _ _s.. � -__- < .. ..- . ,.. < .-� .,, >.. ,,. .r. a.t ,. .._ _:. ,. •._.aJ.. r :. ., ._ . , 1,. -„6 K :,a• a i - A..- t 't <Y` f •r' - crv... _a.. �i �.� iC t:, blind` a eadi wh nh n north,_ 5501 Countryside Rd 1 1 1, ' 1 r 1 1 1'; 1` 2 3 5 4 1 1. t,. .i .. .,. �. .,,, It °n. c � _ •t .. k, ,n , ... �` F. ` . ,. ,. F s ,,._ L, , > . » •, , ^•+I{�'u ,- Y. _ �': ., ..1,1 ,w -r .l: ,i,i ,. .�1', -. f - . L_. -" .... _,. .. n_...Y n .,, ,�, .. .. t _. .. ,:, •Y -, H ,_..,_nr,... recce t Dn C n _,.,..., .- :.._..,,..,aa. ,. .�, r._,. .x.A .. �.x ,,, ,_ '_ I- •.� -.r_, L: + =:- s , .. - ,ca , n ;: �. ,: ,._,.�: ._ . _, .., 6 l,'r .e! .l.r. „n. r..r ! _. 1., .:,L•_ f -,-_t: ta. •.'44 :, 3. 1' i, i y .1.: - �..,._... },...v..' _:-1' L? ': �! T '._J?F t 6112 Ridgeway Rd 'S 1 1` 1 e - CG W x 6.i - .,..:.. _... -,, � ._. ,.- . _ _._..., .4 :.. I: . ,- ., ., ".a• � -S L-' ,fir 2 9 . ._ stnd eBbdl ro- Ilk, _ . _ _ _.a _1. ,�,.• .. + 1 _ a .. .. .r_ .r,: -_ _. C � : .... 11., ;,.? _.:5 r- a- ,<.... _ 1 .:. _. , rv. 1 .•, .,:- .. - .. c,.J ' r . ^... ,' _f:-_ -W'. ;, i..., - .il.:i,. ,ter � � ", :3h 6212 • Westridge Blvd 1' 1 1 1 1 1 s v.. l g,. �. Cr ! 1. �'..• -. _ ., _ __� J.. -' _ :, s_ 1. .r , „ -v r' !• .. tX _- ., .h .' - _ ^. ,r._ , .. r , .. - -r , .... _. ., P ,. _1 .ft .... ..• .. ,. . ,..,., :, , A\ - .G. J•' ,� Bari eious witA schoo anG hea� , traffic`s : .. _ _ _ 4 ... :.. .. , .. ".. _. , , -., _ ..... ... ✓�, -. . E .... .. r- .L. F- _ ,. >• i it ,. _ .. _ . ,._ . iw -4c.., _. _.. ,. .� , , : r -.: , , % , tr a_..< _ S ..+i, - � •4:e � - - '.� 1 ,z. R. � -k: - d,-- - _y FuTr :.5 i -. 61 ." ..., -, .. _.. a Blvd, -t -. _ ,- .. , .. _-v, ,_.. _ ... .•...:. _ ,. �. _.. , .. , , e ... . r .i _ _ , ... .*.. a .. " 6108 ``�, Crescent Dr 1 - 1 _ 1 :. 1 _ 1 _ >.- .- ...r. r ..__ _ _ i - ... P ._,. ._. ,,.... __ - 3 r.,r rn. - - -.1 .., -. ,. , .•. F, -- x I,kr .t. i t - _, s. _ ,. �.. ., r Ss 1_ . r _ r -_ -... ,. � ., � s ; - .. i�•_ -� [ I 1 St. ,,a r` :s_ _:-s E - - ,. [611 2 ,.. ..s ..z _ z >- r _.,. v ... _ .... a �, , ,,, ., J .. .. <. .... , , ..z, u. .>s`,. .. . .., I n ., .. i5 n .rY t. ,t 4 • backyards hold water insprinpgavy 1 ;• Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 rein 1 1 1 3. 1 3 5 1 1 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTON 2012 PROPERTYIQUESTIONNAIRE 6120 Westridge, Blvd Sump Pump Discharge Service Line Drainage Private Unden iround Utilities Resldentlal Roadway Lighting Option Pedestrian Issues Traffic Management 1 1 Willing to Connect Willing to Connect 1 Iriggation sys. in Pet containment Favors pgreding 1 Sidewalk 1 1 5 1 1 Countryside neighborhood around east comer to Crescent Draintile or Footina Drain Has Sump Pump to City Drain Roof Drains Local Drainage Problems blvd. s stem" Street Li hts Preferred Styles Need 1 1 : , 1 Returned - 1 1' - 1 1 :. t 4 ::. , 5. 1 no heed for sidewalk on Hillslde it teas very light traffic 1 eWentrance to Hwy 62 when you get off-` hwy going west hard tomake left turn on ' Tracy, b fflc fight would lie nice 6241 Crescent Dr mg on Round 1 1 1 ADDRESS Survey Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Yes • No Yes No Acorn Coach Lantern Latem Yes No Construct now sidewalks where? S cific N'hood Pedestrian Comments Yes No It yes. where? 1... 1 1 1 1 1 2 ._. 4 ` 5 3.,: 1 . 1 6121 Ridgeway Rd 1 1 1 d d 1 1 a few houses down at bottom of hill on 1 _ 1 5 5 5 2 1 1 1 `. Westridge Blvd. -: 1 .. F 1 1 1 .. 6116 . Westri 9 a Blv - .. _. .,._ ; . : .a - . - a ,..., , ..._ . , . .. 1 ,.. .. . • _ . ., .. ;... 2 1 . 1 1,:_ . ,. 1` 1 , water pools in street and backyard in 6001 Crescent Or 1 1 cars drive in the wrong lane when they turn 1 springtheavy rain 6001 -6009 Crescent 1 1 1 2 4 2 4 1 1 speeding 6208.'• Crest Le off Tracy onto Ridgeway Rd in front of 1.. 1 ,1• �.- _ - 1 - . 6215 Westridge Blvd 1 1 6117, and drive that way for several 6120 Westridge, Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 because there is no curb 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 Countryside neighborhood around east comer to Crescent 1 houses, partially in the wrong lane 6201 21_ V, Tra Ave - cy. 1 :. 1... 1 1 : , 1 to south of m house water pec irnulates y , fora short time in sprinpiavy rain: It 77777. Under Tracy Ave pipe : ` ,., - 1 1' - 1 1 :. t 4 ::. , 5. 1 no heed for sidewalk on Hillslde it teas very light traffic 1 eWentrance to Hwy 62 when you get off-` hwy going west hard tomake left turn on ' Tracy, b fflc fight would lie nice 6241 Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 front yard ::. 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 3 1 already exist 1 1 Rd 6205 ;. Crescent Dr - : -. 1 _:. , 1 . 1 1 1... 1 1 1 1 1 2 ._. 4 ` 5 3.,: 1 . 1 6121 Ridgeway Rd 1 1 1 1 1 a few houses down at bottom of hill on 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 1 1 6120 Westridge Blvd. -: 1 .. = 1 1 1 .. 1 1 north side of Crescent Dr, 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 • . ,. 1 . water drains from backyard and high ground behind property line south side then out onto street and north to comer Need 4 way stop at comer Tracy and of Westridge and Crescent SW low Valley View. Other comments on blank 6223 Westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 comer 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 2 5 1 1. area of packet All the lampslook kind of • cheap. which (lamps) keep light from need stop sign Westridge Blvd (only) as it Water collects at the end of our penetrating skyward? Light pollution intersects with Highland Idnd of a blind 6104 WesMdge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 driveway' . - 1 1 1 3 1_ is a prolem 1 intersection There are several blindspots along streets water pools in some areas of street, and because vegetation planted too close to don't run along curbline effectively at least one side of road in road and sidewalk along Highland and 5505 Highland Rd 1 1 1 1 1 because there is no curb 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 Countryside neighborhood around east comer to Crescent Water from Highland Rd drains into my - K -tums 100' in from Tracy Ave on Highland 6013 - Tracy Ave _ 1 1 1 front yard ::. 1 1 . 1 5 5 2 2 ;.1, already exist 1 Rd 5500 Hunter St 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a few houses down at bottom of hill on 6113 Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 north side of Crescent Dr, 1 1 1 5 4 ., 2 5 1' • . ,. 1 • ; . water pools in street and backyard in 6001 Crescent Or 1 1 1 1 springtheavy rain 6001 -6009 Crescent 1 1 1 2 4 2 4 1 1 speeding 6208.'• Crest Le 1.. 1 ,1• �.- _ - 1 - . 6215 Westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6117.: .Crescent Dr . _. 1 1 1 ; : ' 1 ' 1 1 .. . =,.1 . ' 1 2 1.: It 1 we r poo s at point all ouses in neighborhood meet in back something 6204 Crest Ln 1 1 1 1 must be donel 1 1 1 4 3 3 5 1 1 between 6308 86312 Hillside Rd and' .. _ 6308 , Hillside Rd , - 1 s •, .1 - _ 1 1 1 - . , 8338 VelleyView Rd v 1 ; { 1 .' 1 1' 1 Tracy and ValleyVieiv 6227 Westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 6120 : rescent C Dr : - < - . ,. °:: .. ;.: ; . • ,. 1 �1 c i - 1 1 .�. Street is flat and water has hard time 6125 Westddge Blvd 1 1 1 1 flowing north 1 1' 1 5 3 2 1 1 some speeding 1 Crescen(Dr. 1 1,. • 1 5 T,. -. 6125. .. -. . .. .. .>•.1„ ...... ...... ...._, .... .. .._..., - _ :, ,1 MD- NT81EngPubWksV WICENTRAL SVCStENG DMPROJECTSIIMPR NOS%BA385 Countryslde(2012)1PRELIM DESIGN11NFO MTG%Survey Tabulation.xls 122012 2 of 4 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION 2012 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIRE IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-385 ADDRESS 6116 Crescent Dr Returned Survey 1 Draintile or Footin Drain Yes No Unkn 1 Sump Pump Discharge Service Has a Sum Pump Yes No Unkn 1 Line Willing to Conned to C' Drain Yes No 1 Willing to Connect Roof Drains Yes No 1 I Drainage Local Drainage Problems Explain We have a hage driveway and want Hage to replace section, what are our opti ons? Private Underground Inggation sys. in blvd. Yes No 1 Utilities et containment system Yes No 1 Residential Roadway Lighting Option Favors pgradmg Street Li hts Preferred S es Arlington ou Yes No ACOm CoaChl Lantern Latem 1 1 5 2 4 Pedestrian Issues Si ewalk Need Yes No Construct new sidewalks where? Specific N'hood Pedestrian Comments 1 T Traffic Management Yes No If Yes. where? 1 6100 6201 6112 Ridgeway Rd Hillside Rd Crescent Or 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 YaiNspnng frfroom street to backyard 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 4 5 2 1 1 1 leave things the way they are 1 _ Blvd so more sof the traffic fliows down that way, renovate Trarys road with asphaill 1 Parking on both sides of Hillside by Countryside Park during games 1 6220 Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 none known 1 1 1 1 absolutely notl Don't need sidewalks here 1 not in favor of work at this time, long note attached 6300 Hillside Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 6201 6209 5520 6129 Crescent Dr Crescent Or Highland Rd Westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 4 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 speeding an Tracylll 5608 6237 5504 5517 5508 Highland Rd Crescent Or Highland Rd Highland Rd Highland Rd 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 none known none -this project is a waste of taxpayer moneyl lots of hard to read notes and pictures in here, there is a drainage issue, need a stone drain? water runs down street and collects in my front yard drain flooding on Crescent between Highland and Hunter, street erroding at comer Highland and Westridge 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 kids walking to Countryside NONE NEEDED -DON'T WASTE MY 1 1 People running the stop sign at Olinger Rd and Tracy Ave, dangerous for pedestrians, Police should spend a few hours there and Issue tickets 1 1 eastbound traffic on Highlands too fast and elearvlew issues at curve 1 5509 6121 6113 Hunter St Crescent Dr Ridgeway Rd 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 flooding between neighbor to west and in back in spring/rain 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 5 1 1 1 lValley 1 View Rd 1 1 ValleyYew Rd at Tracy hard to cross Tracy coming oft Hwy 62 during rush hour 1 5604 Highland Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5508 Hunter St 1 1 1 1 1 6113 Hunter has a low spot In front where water collects 1 1 1 1 1 there on both ends of Hunter St and Crescent Or are dearvlew (trees) issues Highland Rd andCrescent intersection too open, no lane markers, see sketch 5500 6117 6128 Highland Rd Westridge Blvd Westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Major drainage issues, and no stone drains, see sketch so you ll know how to fait street drainage issues, lake at the end at driveway in spdnghain 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 1 3 5 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 6133 Westrldge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2' 1 1 prefer an oiled bronze street lamp 1 1 6209 Crest Ln 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 3 1 OED- NTB%EngPubWkstPMCENTRAL SVCStENG DIVIPROJECTSVMPR NOS1BA385 Countryside(2012)1PRELIM DESIGNUNFO MTG1Survey Tabulatlonxls 12/2012 3of4 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTON 2012 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIRE IRM11120f% 10 tACwIT M^ nw -5 ADDRESS Returned Survey Sump Pump Discharge Service Una Willing to Conned Willing to Connect Draintile or Fooling Drain Has a Sump Pump to Citv Drain Roof Drains Drainage Local Drainage Problems Private Underground Utilities nggation sys. in Pet containment btvd. s stem ResldentlaI Roadway Ughting Option Favors Upgrading Street LI hts Preferred Stvies Pedestrian Issues Sidewalk Need Yes NO Construct new sidewalks where? Specific N'hood Pedestrian Comments Traffic Management Yes No es ere Yes No Union Yes No Union Yes No Yes No Explain , . Yes No Yes No Yes No Acorn Coach mg o Lantern Latem 6204 Westridge Blvd 1. 1 1 . -` : 1' _ 1- - lawn collects water no aeeess to sewer raised when new home built now drains through our side yam and into the stone sewer on the as comer of oui lot during anybody else's and someone behind me has a large opening that runs into my badryam 1 1. 6208 Hillside Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6200 1westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 6104 Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 3 1 6205 Hillside Rd . 1.- 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Crosstown and Tracy 5504 Hunter St 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6109 - Crescent Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 4 1 6201 Westridge Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 5 1 1 people cut through from ValleyView to Tracy 5516 - Highland Rd 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 2 4 5- 1 6204 Hillside Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 cars park in the road during baseball games lother Cars go from 62 at Gleason and Tracy exits and go down Tracy past Jerry's to areas of south Minneapolis 78 23 42 13 36 42 9 51 6 68 21 67 7 71 19 65 127 167 152 168 4 73 18 57 Urveys Sent 120 65% 19% 35% 11% 30% 35% 8% 43% 5% 57% 18% 48% 6% 59% 11% 54% 3% 61% 15% 48% Surveys Returned 78 100% 29% 54% 17% 46% 54% 12% 65% 8% 87% 27% 73% 9% 91% 17% 83% 5% 94% 23% 73% MD- NT81EngPubWksTVVACENTRAL SVCStENG DMPROJECTSIIMPR N0S%BA385 Countryside(2012)1PRELIM DESIGN11NFO MTGISurvey Tabulabon.xis UM012 4of4 APPENDIX E Informational Meeting Letter October 17, 2011 City of Edina RE: Countryside Neighborhood Roadway and Utility Improvements Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2012 for your neighborhood. As part of the public involvement process the City held an open house on September 13, 2011, to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specific to your neighborhood. We are hosting a neighborhood informational meeting for the Countryside Neighborhood Roadway and Utility Improvements on October 24, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation starting shortly after 7:00 p.m. that will cover such items as work to be done, preliminary project costs, estimated assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer session. Please see the map on the back side of this letter for the preliminary project area. If you cannot attend the informational meeting the presentation can be made available to you after the meeting. Please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. Sincerely, tJGll,F% V. VUt IIV Q1 t, 1 .L. Assistant City Engineer GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG D1V\PR0JECTS \1M9R NOSXBA385 Countryside(2012)\PRELIM DESIGN\INFO MTG \Info_Mtg_Lett.doc City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 9903 9319 ` 9312 F315 5701 _ _ 5512 PROJECT LIMITS e � 1812 W -B 6000 6004 r 6008 61)CO 6004 600 6012 3 6013 CO 17 6012 OD05 - 6016 8020 EO21 f—A 6009 J 6101 2 0° 6100 6105 - 61134 0 "1 6113 8103 6103 5712 55704 57CX] �'1 K1 B24) 6 � 211 9415 ! ■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ r -- 1 — -iu w■ 6001 &,__,3'1,6520 5516 5512155M 5504 5600 ` 6001 6005 5504 y 8005 ,r HIGHLAIID RD 6008 f 8009 5503 f r 101 5517'I, 5513 5509 5505 5601 6713. ` 8013 6105 z~ ^ I - - -- f 5512 5503 5604 i1 555100 J--- 6616 _ f 8017 6101{, 1, @104 _-'-_ HUIITERST__ t _ / 8105 8106 i` 6113 5508 5601 ,� +f 8101 PPP ~ + '`- 8108 r 6112 6106 ' - 6117 6104 1 6105 6113`- 6109 6104 T 6120 813 ~ 6121 6106 y _ � I 6113 14 6121 81 � � 6125 6112 III 6117 .:: 1 — 6112 — RIDGEWAY RD -- " - -1 8117 1� j/ +~ �T 6129 I 61 10 6121 I 6116 � � � ��� �� 1 y f 6120 ' 6114 i 6123 6132 6128 I, Cc ~ —� 8121 f I G (I 6133 8120 to 6125 $201 82iZ5 C2Ct3 6204 8204 4 8201 �) oWG 6201 —_- 6212 CREST Ul 8208 + t. I _ 6209 jf 51120�1 4 L_ 6205 ._ T f x~ Y - 8201 '�*` `' 3 8209 �. 16213 04 , �j ! \ 620l 8215 6217 8205 8217 8209 6203 l 6221`. 6219 _ ? 6220 Q1 - %' 6300 6223 4 at �, 8223 8303 6213 5212 F-. M1 GQ- {�'S', (A2d] � '(i 822E 6,251) 6301 31300 - -- [� �, 6229 6+31$ l 16233 _ 237 I 63e1) 8305 6304 I �� I 6324 f __-_ -- 6309 6308 '•,` 6'328 j 31 6317 % 21 2313 _ 63 6312\L 25 1 6327 ad � a w a - t 6323 8301 Project Area e Countryside Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -385 r•" 59[18 5812 5816 5820 y 9401 8000 60134 6003 6012 6024 63133 8023 6100 6104 C 6103 6112 =3 '3 6116 6120 6124 6125 — 6200 "� 62 01 6204 :3 621:6 i 6300 6208 620? 6212 - 8216 6216 �� 2 62221 8224 64 03 6225 62`,3 6223 6232 II ±�- I Engineering Dept Argust, 2011 63133 63[14 "� :3 6300 2 !3 64 03 II ±�- I Engineering Dept Argust, 2011 !'w' INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION City of Edina October 24, 2011 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Countryside Roadway Improvements BA -385 i. 'Q ®CITY OF EDINA Input Opportunities PURPOSE OF MEETING IS TO INFORM AND TO GATHER PUBLIC INPUT FROM YOU • Use Post -it notes and place on map • Fill out comment cards • Tell us /Phone us • Write /Email us • Speak at Public Hearing HOLD ALL QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER PRESENTATION CITY OF EDINA Typical Process Special Assessed Projects Chapter 429 of MN State Statute • Initiation of improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Public Open House to inform residents of project and to take comments and input. • Ten days notice is sent to affected property owners and legal notice is placed in paper (Edina Sun) prior to Public Hearing. • Feasibility Report prepared by Professional Engineer and accepted by Council. 1-qO CITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule ..,',013 CITY OF EDINA Introductions Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule Agenda OO CITY OF EDINA Typical Process (continued) • Conduct Public Hearing to order the project. • Ordering of improvement project requires a majority of Council if petitioned by residents o normally 3 of 5 Council votes if >35% signatures of assessed properties, or o 4 of 5 Council votes if project is not initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures) • Levy of special assessments is typically held at the completion of the project through a Final Assessment Hearing. 1 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION ?0 CITY OF EDINA Typical Process (continued) • All assessments are preliminary until project is completed. • Once City Council orders project, assessments become pending. • Typically assessments are lower than pending amount. CITY OF EDINA Typical Process Assessment Policy Interest Rate: Typically 5.5% to 7.5% Based on 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2% Payback Period: up to 10 years CITY OF Agenda Introductions Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule 1: CITY OF EDINA Typical Process Assessment Policy Neighborhood reconstruction: Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • Adjacent properties with side yards are assessed 1/3 REU • Based on address of property CITY OF ED INA Typical Process Assessment Policy Final assessment Hearing After Project is Complete Special Assessment Payment 1. Pay entire balance 2. Partial payment (25% minimum) 3. Spread payment over 10 years 4. Senior deferral 7 mMEN WMY IN Will a�lm c 600000a® Do C m =0 MU339000 s • o e�ov �• m ;oOGp o. �011�9� m O o n 0 0 0. �JO!)70 _.quo °arc• �aea�o 7 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION q CITY OF EDU. Project Details • Project initiated by City staff. • Street originally constructed mid to late 1950's. • Watermain constructed in late 1960's. • Normal maintenance performed on street. • Street pavement approaching end of useful life. • Typical life of street varies ( -35 years). • Storm water drainage issues. • Steel gas main and service pipes. Project Details • Majority of the neighborhood currently has no curb and gutter • Street widths vary from 26 -31 -ft • Sandy -Clay soils Project Details Issues / concerns we do know about: • Varied driveway materials. • Cost of the project. • Inconvenience (e.g. access, dust, noise, etc.) -- it Questionnaire CITY OF EDINA Results • 67 of 120 questionnaires returned - 56% • Many people noted the need for drainage improvements Comments on sight issues in the wide street intersections • 82% of residents do not want changes to the street lights • 93% of residents do not want to add sidewalk CITY OF cUINA Project Details Issues / concerns we do know about: • Storm water drainage issues. • Landscaping placed in boulevard. • Irrigation systems & pet containment fences y J 1 u Project Details Proposed Street Improvements: • B618 concrete curb and gutter along all streets. • Concrete driveway aprons. 3 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION CITY OF EDINA Project Details ;CITY OF EDINA Project Details Improvements do not include: Based on returned questionnaires • Sidewalks • Street lighting CITY OF c��i.' - •. Assessment History CITY OF EDINA Project Details Proposed Utility Improvements: • Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement • Watermain replacement and service upgrades • New fire hydrants • Storm sewer upgrades • New sump pump drain pipe o� CITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule CITY OF EDINA Project Details Preliminary Assessments Countryside Neighborhood $1,450,000 Special Assessed 116 REU's $12,500 per REU INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION 0Go CITY OF EDINA Project Schedule 00 Anticipated Schedule Open House Meeting ...................... Sept. 13, 2011 Informational Meeting ........................Dec. 2, 2011 Tentative Feasibility Report/Public Hearing............ .....January 2012 Bid Opening ........... ..........................March 2012 Award Contract ...... ..........................March 2012 Begin Construction .... ............................May 2012 Complete Construction ..........................Fall 2012 Final Assessment Hearing ...........................2013 CITY OF EDINA Introductions Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule CITY OF EDINA Questions? Comments? Agenda �5 0 00 0Go CITY OF EDINA Project Schedule 00 Anticipated Schedule Open House Meeting ...................... Sept. 13, 2011 Informational Meeting ........................Dec. 2, 2011 Tentative Feasibility Report/Public Hearing............ .....January 2012 Bid Opening ........... ..........................March 2012 Award Contract ...... ..........................March 2012 Begin Construction .... ............................May 2012 Complete Construction ..........................Fall 2012 Final Assessment Hearing ...........................2013 CITY OF EDINA Introductions Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule CITY OF EDINA Questions? Comments? Agenda �5 CIF, %kl IIN� on COUNTRYSIDE INFORMATIONAL MEETING OCTOBER 24, 2011 NAME ADDRESS 1 qr -5-so 5t 2 C�OA te5 �o tr �Wt ma C11 dA °LS 5M O t 4Q h +Th) SA. 3 S'ed 55"0 S f4iahlewd 12oozc� 4 S ®�N C l" /Z�( €�iz �Lo i[ 1 S i D-c Z 5 ,r/s ov �a �z� s «-ry 7 6 2Q 7 -Y -ct SlkP-V- 1 Z Lv es cp4J D ✓ - 8 VL p tr 9 �13a - 1 0 o �.. � c r-�a S bA 1N k t� -N - nl� 13 (��� �•(% l% d' 15 Srb + B°T 6DU^d �0 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 F301 COUNTRYSIDE INFORMATIONAL MEETING OCTOBER 24, 2011 NAME ADDRESS 2 L at, c& X06 /,c,esT�� dg,p v a 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 QUESTION COMMENT CARD A-6v t"c' v Z_- ex Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT 6 APPENDIX H Recommendation to Set Public Hearing, Notice of Public Hearing to Residents and Notice of Public Hearing Advertisement REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.H. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action City Engineer F-1 Discussion D Information Date: December 20, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -132, Setting January 17, 2012 Public Hearing for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction: 1. BA -385 Countryside Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 2. BA -388 Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Street Reconstruction ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2011 -132, calling for Public Hearing on January 17, 2012 for: 1. BA -385 Countryside Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 2. BA -388 Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Street Reconstruction INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting public hearings for two neighborhood street reconstruction projects. All projects are initiated by staff and have included an extensive public process. The feasibility reports for the projects will be provided to Council prior to the public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -132 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -132 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 17, 2012 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION FOR: COUNTRYSIDE, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -385 RICHMOND HILLS PARK, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -388 City of Edina NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 17`h day of January, 2012, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider street reconstruction in the neighborhoods of: • Countryside, Improvement BA -385; • Richmond Hills Park, Improvement No. BA -388; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: December 20, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 20, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk City Hall 952 -927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 January 3, 2012 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -385 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for Countryside Neighborhood. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2012 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2013. The estimated project cost is $1,433,723. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $12,360 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 5421 to 5501 Countryside Rd; 6001 to 6241 Crescent Dr; 6201 to 6212 Crest Ln; 5500 to 5608 Highland Rd; 6201 to 6313 Hillside Rd; 5500 to 5516 Hunter St; 6100 to 6132 Ridgeway Rd; 6013, 6101 and 6201 Tracy Ave; 6316 Valley View Rd; 6100 to 6227 Westridge Blvd. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -385 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Estimated Total Assessment Cost Improvement No. BA -385 $1,433,723 The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed improvements includes all properties between and including: 5421 to 5501 Countryside Rd; 6001 to 6241 Crescent Dr; 6201 to 6212 Crest Ln; 5500 to 5608 Highland Rd; 6201 to 6313 Hillside Rd; 5500 to 5516 Hunter St; 6100 to 6132 Ridgeway Rd; 6013 to 6201 Tracy Ave; 6313 Valley View Rd; 6100 to 6227 Westridge Blvd. These properties are proposed to be assessed at approximately $12,360 per residential equivalent unit; Debra Mangen City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON December 29, 2011 and January 5, 2012 PLEASE SEND TWO (2) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION. BILL TO CITY OF EDINA. APPENDIX I Preliminary Assessment Role 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 PENDING A WENT ROLL COUNTRY SIDE. JVEMENT BA -385 STREET PID LEGAL HOUSE NO OWNER ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT AMOUNT LOT BLOCK COUNTRYSIDE RD 3211721410021 5421 PAMELA & FREDERICK NORDAHL 1/3 $ 4,119.89 3211721410022 5501 ZACHERY & PAULINE NARELL 1/3 $ 4,119.89 CRESCENT DR 3211721440052 6001 HARRIETT HERB 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440053 6005 STEPHEN & ELLEN DOSDALL 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440054 6009 PETER & MARGARET KOETS 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440055 6013 ROBERT & CARMEN EIDE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440056 6017 JOHN & JEANIE MURPHY 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440057 6101 TRACY & MICHAEL BENNETT 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440049 6104 JULIETTE & ERIC SCHNEIDER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440058 6105 MARJORIE MEESTER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440048 6108 SHANNON & EMIL BUSSE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440059 6109 MARK & HELENE ROBACK 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440047 6112 MELISSA KOENING & ITAI SHER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440060 6113 ROGER & ADA STRACHOTA 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440046 6116 KOULA E TRIANTAFYLLOU 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440061 6117 DUANE A SCHLEY 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440045 6120 WALTER & ALICE LEHRKE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440062 6121 ROSEMARY& PATRICK MANION 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440063 6125 DENISE & CLARK SMITH 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110052 6200 ALEXANDER A GIACOMUZZI 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110054 6201 TIMOTHY & LAUREN MCNAMARA 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110053 6204 MARILYN & BERNARD BJERKEN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110055 6205 LISA HEIM 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120048 6208 SETH SMITH & M. HAIGH -GRIAK 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110056 6209 ALLEN D MILLER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110057 6213 SAVINA GHELFI & DAVID LOWE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621110058 6217 ROBERT & NANCY GRANSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120037 6220 PAUL & JANE SCHLUTER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120036 6228 GEORGE & BARBARA JACHIMOWICZ 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120020 6229 JENNY COVINGTON & B CRAGGS 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120019 6233 RICHARD & BARBARA METZGER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120035 6236 SHARON & DAVID STRAND 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120018 6237 TIMOTHY & ANNE TINBERG 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120017 6241 ROBERT & DOROTHY POOL 1.0 $ 12,359.68 CREST LN 511621120041 6201 RUDOLPH RUZICKA 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120045 6204 MARY & GORDON CLEAVELAND 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120044 6208 THOMAS &LYNN CEDERGREN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120042 6209 VAUGHN & HANS KOENIG 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120043 6212 ISAAC H JACOB 1.0 $ 12,359.68 HIGHLAND RD 3211721440026 5500 JUDITH & GEORGE ROOT 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440034 5501 LARRY BETH FORBORD 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440025 5504 MARY E KALB 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440035 5505 RICHARD & CARI KAPSNER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL COUNTRY SIDE IMPROVEMENT BA -385 STREET PID LEGAL HOUSE NO OWNER ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT AMOUNT LOT BLOCK 3211721440024 5508 ROBERT & MARILYN SEDOFF 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440066 5509 M LISTVAN & J GAASEDELEN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440023 5512 MICHAEL & LISA ECKROTH 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440067 5513 SARA & MATTHEW MCLENIGHAN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440022 5516 TODD & JENNIFER MILLER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440038 5517 SCOTT & AMANDA COFIELD 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440021 5520 SEAN & LEAH KELLENBERGER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430061 5600 Y ORANDI & D SLUZEWSKI 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430060 5604 ROBERT J LOMICKA 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430051 5608 RICHARD & ANGELIA PERRIN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 HILLSIDE RD 511621120029 6201 TIMOTHY& MARIAN E OLSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120004 6204 ALFREDA TERRY 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120030 6205 MARY & JOHN LAMB 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120005 6208 SPENCER & MIRIAM TURNER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120031 6209 ANTHONY D OLSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120006 6212 MALVERN THOMPSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120032 6213 SUSAN & JEFFREY PETERSEN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120033 6217 MARC SANDLER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120034 6221 TIMOTHY & SARAH ROBB 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120007 6300 MARY & MARK VIDELE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120008 6304 DAVID W ANDERSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120028 6305 JEAN & DAVID WIKOFF 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120009 6308 DELORES R STROM 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120027 6309 KATHERINE & JAMES OSTLUND 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120065 6312 GAIL & DONALD HAYDEN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120026 6313 TODD & SANDRA WAKEFIELD 1.0 $ 12,359.68 HUNTER ST 3211721440033 5500 EMMA G CHARLES 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440050 5501 PHYLLIS & ARDEN AANESTAD 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440032 5504 RICK & CAMERON ROMER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440031 5508 BETH R MOORHEAD 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440051 5509 MARK & JILL GIERACH 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440030 5512 VICTORIA CARR & M. BRENDEL 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440029 5516 STEVEN & JULIA SCHOONMAKER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 RIDGEWAY RD 3211721430033 6100 SHARON & BRUCE MARTINSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430032 6104 KIMBERLY & CHAD NYBERG 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430040 6105 VERA M SCHLETZER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430031 6108 JENNIE & GREGORY JOHNSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430041 6109 PETER & PAN F EBERHART HALL 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430030 6112 PAUL & JANET FREDRICKSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 32117214300421 6113 ITHOMAS & MARY BATES 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430029 6116 IWALDEMAR DANIELSON 6117 -HARD & KRISTA PETERSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430043 1.0 1.0 $ 12,359.F $ 12,359.6 3211721430028 1 1 611 (RICE SULLIVAN & KENNETH FISCHER 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 PENDING A' 'MENT ROLL COUNTRY SIDE . JVEMENT BA -385 STREET PID LEGAL HOUSE NO OWNER ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT AMOUNT LOT BLOCK 3211721440016 6121 MARK LIDKE & BETSY KITSLAAR 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430027 6124 DONNAY HOMES INC 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430026 6128 MICHELLE & ANGEL ARREOLA 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440015 6132 STEPHEN CLARK & K COLLINS -CLARK 1.0 $ 12,359.68 TRACY AVE 3211721430050 6013 CATHY& BRUCE UTNE 113 $ 4,119.89 3211721430039 6101 JANE & HERMAN BAINS 113 $ 4,119.89 511621120003 6201 ALEXANDRE & ADRIANA PIMKINE 113 $ 4,119.89 VALLEY VIEW RD 511621120022 6316 CAROL VOGT 1/3 $ 4,119.89 WESTRIDGE BLVD 3211721430046 6100 SANDRA & BRIAN BARRY 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440027 6101 BRIGID & ALEXANDER SCOTT 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430045 6104 JOYCE & JAMES SUTHERLAND 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440028 6105 SUMA & BADRINATH KONETY 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721430044 6108 RHONDA & GERARD GREENE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440020 6112 LISA S HAWKS 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440039 6113 GERALD & BEVERLY KOCH 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440019 6116 SHARON & RODGER PEISSIG 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440040 6117 PETES & AMANDA DUPONT 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440018 6120 THEODORE & KAREN OLSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440041 6121 PAUL & JULIE ANDERSON 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440017 6124 ROBERT W SIT 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440042 6125 ANGELINE & ANDREW PORTER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440014 6128 ELIZABETH & CHRISTOPHER PSIHOS 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440043 6129 BONNIE L WEYNARD 1.0 $ 12,359.68 3211721440044 6133 KIMBERLY & ANDREW NOOLEEN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120046 6200 MARCELYN & LOWELL MCCALLA 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120047 6201 NANCY & GEORGE WINTER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120040 6204 JEFFREY & BARBARA MANDEL 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120039 6208 STEPHEN E MCLANE 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120038 6212 JEFFREY KAHRMANN & EILEEN WHELAN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120049 6215 CHARLOTTE M SEGUIN 1.0 $ 12,359.68 5116211200501 1 6219 1 ROBERT & NYDIA CARVER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120021 6220 SCOTT SAKAGUCHI & LAURIE MILLER 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120051 6223 ROBERT & KAREN REED 1.0 $ 12,359.68 511621120052 6227 DIANE M PLUME 1.0 $ 12,359.68 Total 116 PRELIMINARY TOTAL ROADWAY COST $ 1,433,722.73 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REU 116 AVERAGE COST PER REU $ 12,359.68 � ; tS �./ < \ \ \ \ i ® idewalk nd 4 } \ e Coco # -: Faconties (Fig.- 7.10 and 7 r 1 ) 158 AM MWACIU X1100 .A 21 17 3'1 il iii i I Loa 0- val � 494m 158'OMMINlACIIII S ,100 62 ,494. 17 21 31 m Jamie Cynor From: Pam_Nordahl @bluecrossmn.com Sent: Monday, September 12, 20117:52 AM To: Jamie Cynor Subject: Countryside Road project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Hello there. I live at 5421 Countryside Road which is the first house on the corner at the end of street cul -de -sac. We received the letter regarding the project and assessment. None of my other neighbors in the cul -de -sac received the letter. A surveyor in the area told us that he thought the assessment would be only for those needing curbs. We have curbs so we are wondering if we will be charged an assessment or not. Thanks for your help, Pam Nordahl Pam Nordahl Director I Claims Operations p 651- 662 -1808 1 f 651 - 662 -1808 Pam nordahl(aD-bluecrossmn.com fie° D VI MN For the health of all. Important news about email communications If our business rules identify sensitive information, you will receive a ZixMail Secure Message with a link to view your message. First -time recipients will be asked to create a password before they are granted access. To learn more about ZixMail, ZixCorp Secure Email Message Center, and other ZixCorp offerings, please go to ht(o:// userawareness .zixcorD.com /secure4 /index.t)ht) ---------------------- - - - - -- The information contained in this communication may be confidential, and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. if you have any questions concerning this message, please contact the sender. Unencrypted, unauthenticated Internet e-mail is inherently insecure. Internet messages may be corrupted or incomplete, or may incorrectly identify the sender. Jack Sullivan From: Jamie Cynor Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 1:36 PM To: Pam_Nordahl @bluecrossmn.com Cc: Jack Sullivan Subject: RE: Countryside Road project Attachments: Countryside Project Limits.pdf Pam, Our project limits for this project doesn't include Countryside Road so the neighbors in the Cul -de -sac would not receive the letter. Please see attached map to see the project limits. The special assessment portion would be for the reconstruction of the roads. Any curb and gutter and other utilities would come out of their respected utility fund. For additional information you can go to our city website under future projects, which is http: / /www.ci.edina.mn.us /Departments /L5 -17a Construction Projects future.htm and download the brochure or watch the short video. Please contact me with any further questions or clarifications. Thank you 0 �'"' '', Jamie Cynor, Project Manager " B ' w' 952- 826 -0440 1 Fax 952 -826 -0392 }- JCvnor(d)ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Pam Nordahl(c3)bluecrossmn.com [mailto:Pam Nordahl @bluecrossmn.coml Sent: Monday, September 12, 20117:52 AM To: Jamie Cynor Subject: Countryside Road project Hello there. I live at 5421 Countryside Road which is the first house on the corner at the end of street cul -de -sac. We received the letter regarding the project and assessment. None of my other neighbors in the cul -de -sac received the letter. A surveyor in the area told us that he thought the assessment would be only for those needing curbs. We have curbs so we are wondering if we will be charged an assessment or not. Thanks for your help, Pam Nordahl Pam Nordahl Director I Claims Operations p 651- 662 -1808 1 f 651 - 662 -1808 Pam nordahl - bluecrossmn.com . .IMN For the health of all. Important news about email communications: LOGISMap Output Page Page I of 1 http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OVSDE &Client V ... 8/22/2011 Jamie Cynor From: alscott68 @aol.com Sent: Thursday, October 06, 20117:15 AM To: Jamie Cynor Subject: countryside curb & gutter question hello jamie, i just got your letter & questionnaire regarding curb & gutter improvements for our countryside neighborhood. there are 2 questions that ask if i would be interested in connecting roof drains /sump pumps to city drain. i understand that would be our expense, but i am wondering if you work with a contractor that does this kind of thing on your projects or do we solicit bids ahead of time. i checked the box "yes ", but obviously that is conditional upon the amount of extra cost. do you have any idea what kind of prices people are paying for this kind of thing? i have 2 sump pumps. thank you alex scott 6101 westridge blvd. 612 -275 -2506 Jamie Cynor From: anooleen @comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 20118:22 AM To: Jamie Cynor Subject: Re: Countryside meeting Oct 24th? Thanks:) Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my B1ackBerry® From: "Jamie Cynor" <JCynor@ci.edina.mn.us> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 201107:09:40 -0500 To: Andrew Nooleen <anooleen@comcast.net> Cc: Jack Sullivan<jsullivan ,ci.edina.mn.us>; <JCynor@ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: RE: Countryside meeting Oct 24th? Kim and Andy, The survey letter just wanted you to be aware that we would have an up and coming meeting regarding the Countryside project. You should receive a letter today or tomorrow stating the details for the October 24th meeting. If after reading the letter and you have additional questions please feel free to contact me. Thanks ( 0 Ad Jamie Cyn or, Project Manager 952- 826 -04401 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 JCynoredina.mmus I www.CitvofEdina.com ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Andrew Nooleen [mailto:anooleen(a)comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 17, 20118:16 PM To: Jamie Cynor Cc: 'Nooleen, Andrew'; 'Andrew Nooleen' Subject: Countryside meeting Oct 24th? Hi Jamie, We read in the last letter Oct 4th that there would be a meeting on Oct 24th however we have not received any details about this. Do you know when and where then meeting will be? O Thanks for the info- Kim and Andy Nooleen From: Jamie Cynor [mailto:JCynor0ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 201110:03 AM 1 To: Andrew Nooleen Subject: RE: Y2011 letter to residents + sidewalk plan Kim and Andy, Here is the letter and the project limits for your neighborhood. I will also attach the existing /future sidewalk plan that is in our Comprehensive Plan that was approved by council. Please contact me with any further questions. Jamie Cynor, Project Manager 8 ' x 952 -826 -04401 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 e JCvnoraci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Andrew Nooleen [mailto:anooleen @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 20118:09 AM To: Jamie Cynor Cc: 'Andrew Nooleen' Subject: Y2011 letter to residents + sidewalk plan Hi Jamie Thank you for your time at the meeting this week. Per our discussion, we just purchased a home at 6133 Westridge Blvd. 1. please email me the letter that was sent to the residents Y2011 regarding the upcoming project. 2. Please email me the current sidewalk plan if there is one for the Countryside neighborhood O Thanks, Kim and Andy Nooleen 2 Jack Sullivan From: Itai Sher <isher @umn.edu> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 1:15 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Jack Sullivan Subject: Attn City Council: Countryside Road Construction Project Dear council members, I am writing with regard to the proposed Countryside road construction project. People often comment on the beauty of our neighborhood, due to its rustic feel. Adding curbs, as the current project proposes, would take away some of our neighborhood's character. From conversations, I know that some of my neighbors feel similarly. At the recent informational meeting, other neighbors raised similar concerns. One resident pointed out that many of us moved here to begin with because of the country feel and that curbs can become quite ugly when not maintained (if I understand, there is no plan to do so for twenty years). Another pointed out that our neighborhood is called "countryside" precisely for this reason. Similar sentiments probably account for the fact that on the engineer's survey 93% of respondents voted against sidewalks. However, the engineer's survey did not ask us about curbs. I believe that a similarly large percentage of residents would oppose curbs if they were asked. I could be wrong, but there is no way to know unless we ask. If we leave it to individual initiative, then only a small percentage of residents are likely to contact the city council. In contrast, if the city council were to send out a survey on this question to residents, this would generate much more feedback. I believe that 56% of residents responded to the engineer's survey, and if a similar percentage responds on the question of curbs, then we should have a good idea about how the neighborhood feels. I believe that a survey is the best way to inquire about public opinion because it will be unbiased, revealing both the sentiment in favor of and sentiment opposed to curbs, giving everyone an accurate picture of people's attitudes. So I am requesting that you perform such a survey and publicly release the results before the upcoming meeting at which the city council will vote on the project. I am aware that the charge for curbs is not part of the special assessment, but we are the ones who will have to live with them. The city council still has the option to vote for curbs even if a majority or large majority oppose them. But I think that a vote taken with knowledge of people's feelings is better than one taken without knowledge. The results of such a survey would add to the transparency and public accountability of the process, and would also make people feel better for having been consulted on a decision that affects them. Sincerely, Itai Sher 6112 Crescent Dr. Edina, MN 55436 Jack Sullivan From: Kathleen Collins Clark <kjcclark @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 11:21 AM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Countryside Street Reconstruction Hi Jack, It was very nice to meet you on Monday night. Steve and I live at 6132 Ridgeway Rd. We discussed a few things that am just confirming in this email. 1. We agree with many neighbors that curbs are not ideal in our "country" neighborhood as well as wishing we did not have this project to begin with, considering the cost. But given that it looks like we will be going through with the curb installation next summer we would like to discuss what options there are to address the drainage issues we have on our property. 2. When we first bought our home we did not have any standing water issues but over time an area in the back of our yard had standing water for weeks in the spring. As the neighbor behind us built up his garden with leaves each fall and perhaps as land settled, we had more issues. 3. However, those drainage problems quadrupled when a large house was built close to our property and higher than our lot. Now we have a large area of our backyard that has standing water in the spring which requires us to pump it out so that our trees do not die. Additionally, our sump pump in our basement pumps consistently through the spring and summer due to runoff from our neighbor's property. We have had a surveyor out to see what we could do but he said that the street was actually a few inches higher than our lot making the situation more difficult. We really appreciate that you are willing to work with us before the project begins and look forward to the next step. Please let us know how you would like to proceed. Best regards, Kathy and Steve Clark Kathleen Collins Clark Market Research Consultant Market Research Solutions, Inc. Office: 952 - 920 -9366 Cell: 952 - 913 -6998 Jack Sullivan From: Spencer Turner <turnersa12 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 3:14 PM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Countryside Roadway Improvements Jack First, hats off to the City and you for making a great effort to keep the citizens informed on the upcoming improvements and for giving us a chance to give you "on the ground" suggestions. I appreciated the meeting you held on October 24. There are 3 items I'd like to call to your attention. 1) Where Hillside Rd meets Tracy Ave. The resident at 6201 Hillside Rd has planted some arborvitae trees fronting Tracy. It has become difficult to see traffic coming from the south on Tracy as one tries to pull out from Hillside onto Tracy. The problem will get worse as the trees grow. The solution is to remove several of the trees that block the view. 2) When there are baseball games at Countryside Park spectators of the games park on both sides of Hillside near the stop sign. Turning on to Hillside from Tracy one finds themselves on a one lane street. The solution would be to put a no parking sign on one side of the street. 3) Coming south on Crescent Dr between Highland Rd and Hunter St bushes and large trees block the view of the road ahead. The street is very narrow at that point as well. The solution would be to either aggressively trim the bushes and trees or remove them entirely. Thanks for listening. Spencer Turner 6208 Hillside Rd. 952 - 929 -6216 APPENDIX L Edina Transportation Commission Review Data and Meeting Minutes � e Nov.. 1 c9-0// ,�� REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Co�vt.,�5.ow Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Review Chair Janovy explained that they will receive the feasibility reports for the neighborhood reconstruction projects for review and then make recommendations to Council. She said tonight is an opportunity for them to give input before the feasibility reports are completed. Mr. Sullivan said nothing unusual is planned for any of the 2012 neighborhoods. Regarding Valley Estates, he said the area is in the walking shed for Creek Valley Elementary and he and member Bass met with school officials and discussion included adding a sidewalk on Creek Valley Road. Mr. Sullivan said staff was not proposing a sidewalk in this neighborhood. The current sidewalk funding policy is 25% school district, 25% City and 50% assessed to residents. After discussion, the following recommendations were made: 1) sidewalk on Creek Valley Road; 2) inform residents of options for private rain gardens and possible funding (due to drainage issues); 3) review parking issue on Nordic Circle /Creek Valley Road; 4) try to address drainage issue if in ROW through rain gardens or other environmentally sound ways; and remove stump street [street name ?] to reduce impervious surface. In Countryside, upgrades will include water main and water service upgrades, certain intersection upgrades to minimize impervious surface, and new curb and gutter. Discussion included narrower intersections and pedestrian safety. The question was asked how the decision is made to include sidewalks? Is it based on 750 cars per day or on other initiatives that the Council may be focusing on, such as walkable communities? It was noted that the City is making decisions now that will have an impact for 40 years. After discussion, the following recommendations were made: adding sidewalk on one side of Westridge from Highland to Valley View and on one side of Crescent from Hillside to Tracy; and to review curb radius of narrowed intersections to ensure adequate turning radius for larger vehicles, especially school buses. Concern was expressed that a too -short curb radius will not necessarily slow down vehicles but will cause vehicles to turn into the oncoming traffic lane of the receiving roadway. Mr. Sullivan said they generally plan for a 20 ft. curb radius and they have tested this with school buses. A slightly longer radius was suggested. Additional discussion focused on the need for a sidewalk on Valley View /Whiting; the need to review the Valley View /Whiting and Tracy intersection, per resident concerns; and the need to review safe crossing locations from the neighborhood to Countryside Park. In Vikings Hill, Mr. Sullivan said upgrades will include spot utility repairs. Mr. Sullivan was asked about the STOP sign at Arctic and Vernon, per resident concerns. Does it have a stop line and double yellow? He thought so, but said he would check. An effort to improve STOP sign compliance was recommended. Also discussed was the need to improve pedestrian facilities along Vernon and Gleason and safe crossing locations. It was noted, however, that Vernon and Gleason are outside of the project area. Mr. Sullivan said in December, Tracy Avenue, Gallagher Road, and Richmond Hills Park will be presented. TLC Phase 1 Bike Boulevard — Steve Clark. Transit for Livable Communities Mr. Sullivan said a 2 "d open house is scheduled for December 12, 7 p.m. at Public Works and Park Maintenance, 7450 Metro Blvd. He said staff should have a consultant selected by next Monday from the two companies that responded to the RFQ. Regarding advisory bike lanes, Mr. Sullivan said MnDOT said they have never seen them before and the street in Minneapolis where it was used did not require MnDOT's involvement. He said if advisory lanes are approved, it would be the first of its kind in the state and the country. Update of Proposed 494 /Xerxes Avenue Public Open House Mr. Sullivan said MnDOT would like to attend the December ETC meeting to present their proposed plan and they will be holding an open house on November 29. 2 Neighborhood Attributes Neighborhood: Countryside Curb ADT Street Width Bit Conc Type Bulk Sur Sidewalks Parking (2011) 85th % Location Schnnl 7onp \ \ED- N-- �EngPubWks \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA ? "' Countryside(2012) \PRELIM DESIGN \INFO MTG \Traffic lnfo_Countr '°.xlsx Hillside Road 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed 190; 77 29.5; 26.3 1; 2 Yes both sides Westridge Blvd. 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed 283; 127 26.8; 25.9 3; 7 Yes both sides Crescent Drive 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed 257 23.6 4 Yes both sides Ridgeway Road 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed 121 26.4 5 Yes both sides Highland Road 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed 187 24.6 6 Yes both sides Hunter Street 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed NA NA NA Yes both sides Crest Lane 30' Bituminous City None None Allowed NA NA NA Yes both sides \ \ED- N-- �EngPubWks \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA ? "' Countryside(2012) \PRELIM DESIGN \INFO MTG \Traffic lnfo_Countr '°.xlsx Countryside Crash Data (2001 -2010) Crash Statistics Year: 2001-2010 Intersection: Countryside Total Crashes: 10 Breakdown by Year Year: 2010 Total: Severity: Year: 2009 Total: Severity: Year: 2005 Total: Severity: 4 3 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 1 Injury: Possible Injury 0 Injury: Non - Incapacitating Injury 0 Injury: Incapacitating Injury 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 0 Injury: Possible Injury 0 Injury: Non - Incapacitating Injury 0 Injury: Incapacitating Injury 1 0 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 0 Injury: Possible Injury 1 Injury: Non - Incapacitating Injury 0 Injury: Incapacitating Injury Location 1;2;4 Location 5 Location R Year 2002 Total: 2 Severity: 1 Property. Damage: No Apparent Injury 1' Injury: - Poisible_Injury 0 Injury:_ Non- Incapacitating Injury 0. Injury: Incapacitating Injury- Year 2001 Total: 2 Severity: -12 Property =Damage:_No,Apparent'lnjury Q Injury:; Possible Injury 0 I ury -_Non= Incapacitating Injury - - 0 Injury: Incapacitating Injury Location 5 1 Location 3; 4 PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE OCT. 24, 2011 Cn7 OF EDNA 8 U Cv U a I�vce) Q;;�)�✓ COUNTRYSIDE RD - s62, I: ssn l . sa s \•061 ^T 5509 5501- 9 I 335 5521 5517 I i 1 it .. � I I 5809 . I I' ' .. I >_ ' I ' I � ..�. II' I �.f • i �' V , I . __ \ .. I . ' \ -T—. I ` ? 7, iA i r 6001 I \ \ } { I I I tool ' 800- 11--^^ _ ._ -.-•- . \ c_.- }} '�' 11' 11+,2. 1 5508 ' 5504 i 5300 5520.. l: 5310 r. I I - 6005, .. 3600 _•-- -•••}— __=�-_- -- -�.• 1 r I r. 1 I 6004. •�%r �,�,�, .j0. � 1 � 1. : - .tr, - ^l c_ > 2,1._..._._ �q " .�s.s.. ',-] •Ha G.H_ . -L-A- _ N-D _ 1 RD � - - . _ ..•T � ptI •. y " a�r� ��`~. - +,�',., �, .6-00 r9-: , — w 5604 .BOOB 5505 F- y — I I .. I..,. 14.6013- " t•��C; f�°, \�4r I!' `�'� I 6012 y. •fipT.•!': :. •' ` n �` "l' r -'��_ 4 I. • �., "-.. -. r �.` aI Y'.= J'J� ! r' 1� ' y\ .. j /i \ .I ,r � I •3506 .!I 1 5504 f � 5500 bola i / .vim f` sstx ;'Iff .\ ' ":, r -� •n r - �i '�• - 6104 JUI 'i 6101 / ?' w\ `.44444\ _ "�- WK`•- - q`�CI /� ' 6020 t' -. /- `1 / /i♦ J 'l;f 06 .'d. /,•_ • • `- 5509, i ! .I 5501 j ! 6101. I \: : `�, .,� �, /r \ r ,•�y� 6,13 I:r - u � r%� l ' � �_ .-. - - \ _.L + � %; 6,09 � ; - �•°' � � _ � J i - 1''•, - - `., - ' •� •� / / 6116 '6117 , .I 4 �6(,.' 604 \ 11 ''i% / a� rn,. r' :1 4 .-:-'t • '_ "� �V' 8106. I , _ t- ' ` • 1 ,.'-. 6113 < �"'."" \ ," . �- ^ ► .�' ' 1 6120 4 _ �t0s 6121 A :* 6109 / 1 i �' ' 4•'. -. r - ft _ '' 6113 I j � ,,,�• /� ,1\ . }�•' \:i'•" __ __ � � 1 - _ 1� ,..r•`- .-.-r' Y,..• .G -•r -6124. "•� ��. I• ~8T12 •1k. i 6115` I. 'y. /' ,;' 42 •` \,1,`., ` 321 I r) '6125 ,I,.. 1 l+ ..•6117 I I� nloe_ewAY rto T ! / C.f a Vii/ 11 `et,7.. 3i20` / ti - i� I x129- : _ 6116 A 0121 I. f / / ( 6I2 +^t __ 1 / 'f ' •� // I. - i 6132 8131II al2r' alts t .I .. // ,. \ ~ \. r.; 1 I I 6200 i... I ? •� 6201, z I 6200 F• � ' � 6201ti, � s� CREST u 6204 :1 lZ2 Z. '--�,.z -� • \.,• i! / _. \ \'' . l . _. •�:'� • .'!e _ _ _- ,t' , 5205 •. I �i' \ 6201 \� / ✓. �. 621] r - � �� 6204 •� �� � " I bias _ `• • ' +` f J,\ , \ ' 621. a 1 . 0208 1 1 6209 . ;t,, ,� \.��• B� `221, - r / 6212 ,� 1 ,•`.� I 6213 1d 11I ,' - _ I I��l / v»„�•� - .,6241. 6305 I� t\ n r *f • 6306_ I 1 63121, WHITING AVE P N, 6201-. - 16204f7 6209:' • \ ' . . I ,, 1 6 } 5211 .. ��pp�_��, 6208' 7 1 - .r \621 �J I - I \', \ � is � .6219 is / � • �. i - r.` �l }= •: 62x01• , r: l I a 136 I 6226 ;• • \ \'.. % �'� -��. /.I•� 1 I 1 , I. j`' �• f °�•I X� ,',o.�J�•- 6300 63M f , V�',. -��� .` . -tip ±;' • 6229- / `'� -1,. �.�� ,I� �'_�_•_ f.d,� ��J`•- '62�] ..�'i i•� /.n`�\ .63,6 ��' � ��, r`• - \ y CITY OF EDINA � \N� 2� 7450 T METRO BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �� e a, Edina, MN 55439 -3037 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION B ,�� )1y Ph: 826 -0371 Fax: 826 -0392 :1 -38/ LEGEND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED CURB S GUTTER - - - EXISTING ROAD CJ- EXISTING STREET LIGHT - - - - LOT LINES — — RIGHT OF WAY LINES 8 U Cv U a I�vce) Q;;�)�✓ COUNTRYSIDE RD - s62, I: ssn l . sa s \•061 ^T 5509 5501- 9 I 335 5521 5517 I i 1 it .. � I I 5809 . I I' ' .. I >_ ' I ' I � ..�. II' I �.f • i �' V , I . __ \ .. I . ' \ -T—. I ` ? 7, iA i r 6001 I \ \ } { I I I tool ' 800- 11--^^ _ ._ -.-•- . \ c_.- }} '�' 11' 11+,2. 1 5508 ' 5504 i 5300 5520.. l: 5310 r. I I - 6005, .. 3600 _•-- -•••}— __=�-_- -- -�.• 1 r I r. 1 I 6004. •�%r �,�,�, .j0. � 1 � 1. : - .tr, - ^l c_ > 2,1._..._._ �q " .�s.s.. ',-] •Ha G.H_ . -L-A- _ N-D _ 1 RD � - - . _ ..•T � ptI •. y " a�r� ��`~. - +,�',., �, .6-00 r9-: , — w 5604 .BOOB 5505 F- y — I I .. I..,. 14.6013- " t•��C; f�°, \�4r I!' `�'� I 6012 y. •fipT.•!': :. •' ` n �` "l' r -'��_ 4 I. • �., "-.. -. r �.` aI Y'.= J'J� ! r' 1� ' y\ .. j /i \ .I ,r � I •3506 .!I 1 5504 f � 5500 bola i / .vim f` sstx ;'Iff .\ ' ":, r -� •n r - �i '�• - 6104 JUI 'i 6101 / ?' w\ `.44444\ _ "�- WK`•- - q`�CI /� ' 6020 t' -. /- `1 / /i♦ J 'l;f 06 .'d. /,•_ • • `- 5509, i ! .I 5501 j ! 6101. I \: : `�, .,� �, /r \ r ,•�y� 6,13 I:r - u � r%� l ' � �_ .-. - - \ _.L + � %; 6,09 � ; - �•°' � � _ � J i - 1''•, - - `., - ' •� •� / / 6116 '6117 , .I 4 �6(,.' 604 \ 11 ''i% / a� rn,. r' :1 4 .-:-'t • '_ "� �V' 8106. I , _ t- ' ` • 1 ,.'-. 6113 < �"'."" \ ," . �- ^ ► .�' ' 1 6120 4 _ �t0s 6121 A :* 6109 / 1 i �' ' 4•'. -. r - ft _ '' 6113 I j � ,,,�• /� ,1\ . }�•' \:i'•" __ __ � � 1 - _ 1� ,..r•`- .-.-r' Y,..• .G -•r -6124. "•� ��. I• ~8T12 •1k. i 6115` I. 'y. /' ,;' 42 •` \,1,`., ` 321 I r) '6125 ,I,.. 1 l+ ..•6117 I I� nloe_ewAY rto T ! / C.f a Vii/ 11 `et,7.. 3i20` / ti - i� I x129- : _ 6116 A 0121 I. f / / ( 6I2 +^t __ 1 / 'f ' •� // I. - i 6132 8131II al2r' alts t .I .. // ,. \ ~ \. r.; 1 I I 6200 i... I ? •� 6201, z I 6200 F• � ' � 6201ti, � s� CREST u 6204 :1 lZ2 Z. '--�,.z -� • \.,• i! / _. \ \'' . l . _. •�:'� • .'!e _ _ _- ,t' , 5205 •. I �i' \ 6201 \� / ✓. �. 621] r - � �� 6204 •� �� � " I bias _ `• • ' +` f J,\ , \ ' 621. a 1 . 0208 1 1 6209 . ;t,, ,� \.��• B� `221, - r / 6212 ,� 1 ,•`.� I 6213 1d 11I ,' - _ I I��l / v»„�•� - .,6241. 6305 I� t\ n r *f • 6306_ I 1 63121, WHITING AVE P N, 6201-. - 16204f7 6209:' • \ ' . . I ,, 1 6 } 5211 .. ��pp�_��, 6208' 7 1 - .r \621 �J I - I \', \ � is � .6219 is / � • �. i - r.` �l }= •: 62x01• , r: l I a 136 I 6226 ;• • \ \'.. % �'� -��. /.I•� 1 I 1 , I. j`' �• f °�•I X� ,',o.�J�•- 6300 63M f , V�',. -��� .` . -tip ±;' • 6229- / `'� -1,. �.�� ,I� �'_�_•_ f.d,� ��J`•- '62�] ..�'i i•� /.n`�\ .63,6 ��' � ��, r`• - \ y CITY OF EDINA � \N� 2� 7450 T METRO BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �� e a, Edina, MN 55439 -3037 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION B ,�� )1y Ph: 826 -0371 Fax: 826 -0392 :1 -38/ :219 9312 53'15 5?01 4 I R�?JEc LIMITS q `� :W (5412 - t� 33C6 i $ `a, •.3 . 13 1G ii .11 3 Lv, s$ �� p 3 21�z 1 8415 �� � ©� ©� or3em om ©r3 m�� $o 0000 9]01 53[171,6627 E6118 6512 Cf I E6 04I. E6CA 1., �1 w61 i I i 1 67175 EOd4 C+7C15 � Er;� �� _ � 3 HIGHLAIID RD 1— J _r - -- 9]04 \ �'I ^; - I I 1 ---1 l MIA _ 97 [0 f l 6101 " 311E it 5613 1 f,09 F6Cb r�5Q1 y [ 9713 1 ,r ' -- -�___� L _— EO 1.3 OCO 08 8012 SQ3 604 ' - -- - -- d' .012 6 I c 1 55637 o C0!78 __ - 8100 f"'7a�. �'`Ffi16 r R L_ 1 ! «]1r 017 6]12 MC15 �~ - t !� `� `t l_ HURTER ST z_. 1 ° 8316 }# 6109 .." Fo104 --�. -� ! CM020 _ 5021 s ' ^8145 �' 51CO \� 6113 55C2 6601 t 6101 0 6]02 •,w r' i '� t^ 1 '� —o ` ^ ^° 6112 `R ` —i 6405 v - - -- 6401 ^�-r ^, 6108u� ` ~\ `� —� 8104 t o 81 U3 t r� x71[0 " 105 t ` "~ ~ ~x3116 _ 1,40 147 4 i 8103 a 6105 f `�. 8'104 iY^ ^61.13 \ - x l i 6120 8424 6103 El __ $113 ° 6104 � 6103 �. ^ "1 •�811F y6424 t 81 CO 4l 012' 6125 6112 3 3 611.3 - ^' 6117 6103 — 112` ! k[DGEWAY RD 011E J`d , - 6429 81 J I 6421 704 67(0 /8146 8120 X89 24 8128 ! 81 a2 l 81211 l u� a 6421 t pn 6.133 4 6120 6125 ° ;6200 � 62x71 E2 CO C 6201 6203 6204 6201 secs 1�� I 82.2 CREST L11 6203 •, 8203 i 15 05 �.1 7 •�\ J0 8204 4-- �� —�' Y� 8201 _ '`.. f 1,i\i�\ 6213 ! "\ "x• �� 82a3 �\ 82Ced' 'o :�'r t / \ ` _ ' 6216 6217 1� 13 ` o , 621Tf.. f`r 8212 _� 6219 0209 \ 622@ \ ?1 ; . /'� EGO) \� 6238 82213 ` �yi c), 1 ' 6223 83CO 1 8213 � ,,• ,1.� {, is 8220 � F= ^ J -- - _ ` "Q� ^•' .t ,f'1 c^ x62' I t 6297 6301 fu00 6241 -I 1E2^ 1 EGOI 826 �!� 3�0 r 6305 83134 C r)6320 = _ 02 105 J��^ ` ^ 63 Cu ., Cv C0,09 W.08 l ' ' 63Ce3 E323 f� 631T W055 "^ ,.1 L. ," 21 `\ ` ft313 23 r `, ` 8327 `- C 1 far ;3 �U r V e C,�l Project Area ' Countryside Street Reconstruction Improvement No". 6��_30 3303 W12 3318 EA27 MI a a a Ev $72 61CO 61 Ci4 0'112 61'13 612] 6124 61L ^o 672CO U2 CO 6S2W. 6'212 6216 6220 622A a228 S2C2 j E'''ra J� 23 2 �3 6307 �- r=3 C3 E�03 rr + _E t�gineerin•3 0�E rkh3rJ_'v, i�111 Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication Date: January 12, 2012 Subject: Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvements — BA -385 Attachments: DRAFT January 9, 2012 ETC minutes Situation: The ETC recommends including sidewalks in this project. Background: At our November 2011 regular meeting, the ETC reviewed resident feedback; speed, volume and accident data; and proposed improvements in the project area, which is within a school and park walking zone. The ETC recommended that sidewalks be included in the project and identified locations for the sidewalks. The main reasons were: • The project area is within a school and park walking zone; • The sidewalks would provide a connection between a future sidewalk on Valley View and the existing sidewalk on Tracy; • There will not be an opportunity to add sidewalks as part of a street reconstruction project for another 30 -50 years; • Sidewalks are consistent with the policy directions currently being developed. The project feasibility study addresses the ETC sidewalk recommendation on p. 9 -10. The feasibility study does not concur with the ETC recommendation. At our January 9, 2012 special meeting, the ETC reviewed the feasibility study and voted to forward this advisory communication to affirm our sidewalk recommendation. (Please see next page.) Assessment: The ETC acknowledges the following: • The sidewalks are not shown in Figure 7.10 of the Comprehensive Plan; • All streets in the project area have low traff ic volumes and 85'h % speeds are below the posted limit; • The sidewalk routes were not presented to residents at neighborhood open houses; • The report does not discuss the feasibility of the sidewalks; • Residents will be assessed for 50% of the cost. The ETC also acknowledges that sidewalks are: • Consistent with the vision for our community as stated in the Comprehensive Plan; • Consistent with the policy directions currently being developed; • Part of a broader pedestrian network; and • Context sensitive (within school and park walking zones). Recommendation: Include sidewalks in the project as proposed by the ETC. Routing From To Action Requested Jennifer Janovy, ETC chair Jack Sullivan Please distribute to the Council for the Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvements public hearing on January 17. MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING PUBLIC WORKS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM JANUARY 9, 2011 6:00 p.m. City Council asked ETC to call a special meeting to advise the ROLL CALL: Answering roll call were members Bass, BrAd`eq, Janovy, COMMUNITY COMMENTS — None REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS REVISED FEASABILITY REVIEW Public Hearing on January 17, 2012. and Schold Davis. Richmond Hills Park \ �, Assistant City Engineerullivan introduced o Mufrom - EH, the`co�n ultant for the project. Mr. Sullivan started goyiirfd-an,w�, iew of th F'E ,iIity�Reportt • This neighborh d has so , a curb an quitter rready. All�new curb and gutter will be installed. Roadway will re�mai in abo t "t a same locatio . • Selected utility rep semen 1, include water main, sanitary sewer and some storm sewer to �• iNarMck and`K,ent, V11�dsof and`Kent -"inteers'ekcfi`ons will be redesigned to more traditional "T" intcsrsections to ir�rlDrove defi iition of roadwav and riaht- of -way. From`r e \�g on Decemb� �h, prio di ussion included radius at these locations, bus operations, and drainage co cerns. General o ensus f the ETC at that time was not to include sidewalk on 56th Street or on any otheroadway withioh�projec . ) Discussion amohg E - \C members oh January 9, 2012: • This area is 62 side ttJ 6 s liool walking zone and is an "all bus route" to Countryside Elementary. There is a paved�nal wa, along Normandale from Benton Avenue to Eden Avenue. • Mr. Sullivan was ask e what is looked at when evaluating a project for pedestrian improvements. Is it the sidewalk figure in the comprehensive plan and the potential to add sidewalks, or are there other improvements also considered, such as marking crosswalks, improving drainage (to reduce ponding on street), evaluating sight lines. For bike lanes, Mr. Sullivan was asked whether they look at the storm grates and longitudinal joints for example. Mr. Sullivan indicated they do replace storm grates, address ponding, and consider the longitudinal joints. Mr. Sullivan was encouraged to communicate to the Council and public the level of detail that is thought through with regard to pedestrian and bicycling improvements. \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Minutes \2012 Minutes \MINUTES for January 9, 2012—Special Meeting.docx • Mr. Sullivan was asked whether street lighting is evaluated and whether current lighting is sufficient, for example for pedestrians. Mr. Sullivan stated that most are traditional lighting at intersections to delineate the intersection. • Mr. Muse indicated questionnaires have been sent out to residents. He indicated six residents stated the need for sidewalks and even fewer preferred changing street lights. • Members noted the project cost increased from the cost stated in the original communication to residents. Mr. Sullivan indicated that the original letter was a generic amount and neighborhoods that need more extensive restoration are not accounted for in original letter. Mr. Muse mentioned that the increase is partially due to repair to sanitary servi e lines, which have extensive root infiltration. 7 • Mr. Muse addressed the issue of school buses maneuve ing)n redesigned intersections. There will be a little overlap of the bus into the oncoming traffic,6ne, but this is typical of buses in any area of town. Cars have a tighter turning radius so will not,orespnt�roblem. • Mr. Muse commented that residents have reviewed_the change at the informational meeting and there was minimal comment regarding the reducti n in pavemer�at�he intersections with Warwick and Kent and the Windsor and Kent inten�ectI'o s. Mr. Sullivam.stated that with the increase in boulevard space, driveways and irrigatio�isyst�ms will be extended accordingly. Snow plowing and snow removal will not be affected. Streit �I hting will be changed accordingly to illuminate the intersections. �. \ /� \ \� • The ETC commented on the need for a • Members discussed the exii Eden Avenue down to Bentc streets of the project. Mr. Sul suggesting enhancing the crc • Members asked what the pi addressed thr tt§h� e,,ppro should be id tified- to�addre • Mr. Sulliva w asked w ei them. There a some dill of the survey. does the policy_direction, suph as Li4 • have. The Edina report. ETC doesn't have plan. Countryside Neighborhood ct (i.6, these er resi( ilk alond�Ndfmand< len terminates \at East :edlhat since these stq to visu4y ontinue "paf \for addressing traffic i ainonai; stop signs, ty balance . Streets. Th stion was a dewalk in ti argue for'`si ale Frontage RoadAhat extends from View Lane. This trail crosses seven ;ets have low level of traffic staff is not ,ment concerns that will not be ing on Richmond). A process ormed -that W)rether a sidewalk is installed is up to ;idents could get that impression from the wording responsive to resident preferences with an overall -d for a pedestrian plan was noted. "Where should our priorities be ?" Although the i hborhood, it is not opposed to a sidewalk, The Iks in this neighborhood based on the information is recommending the improvements as indicated in the feasibility particular project but it is triggering discussion regarding a pedestrian Mr. Sullivan started by giving an overview of the Feasibility Report and the discussions held at the November 17, 2011 ETC meeting. • The neighborhood will have all new curb and gutter • New water services and other selective utility rehabilitations • Realignment of four intersections along Crescent Drive \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Minutes \2012 Minutes \MINUTES for January 9, 2012—Special Meeting.docx • The ETC recommended the addition of sidewalk along Westridge Boulevard and Hillside Road. Discussion among ETC members on January 9, 2012: • Recognize that putting sidewalks throughout is expensive. Since there are kids walking to school and nearby parks, the ETC thought it was a reasonable compromise to increase the walk - ability and look at the most natural pathway through the neighborhood to the school and park. The most logical path would be Westridge Boulevard and Hillside Road to access Countryside Park and Countryside Elementary School. • Mr. Sullivan stated that if the sidewalk was added, accommodate the addition of a 5' boulevard and 5' heat from street and sidewalk and tends to dry tho tightened up. • Mr. Sullivan stated that very preliminary estimates he An assessment amount of f/ school -25 %, residents -50% and the City-25%. Th in the project area. The residents are not aware of tt • In all projects sidewalks and drainage should be,c routes. If Council sees this as theolicy, then it is r project. For future projects, letters andloes residents that Edina has a walk - ability goal a • Reiterated that there is Countryside �arkg,, Recognize we developing a Living StIre ," throughout the City ? -­Identifyy the best`plac Where does the�e;/idl pt's jnpO come in whe • With limited dol(lars to be spet, would the\( Mr. Sullivan indicaie� we have more need # to work within. • Recommendation from prior eetL(�was if crosses Discussionxaba where- crossw • S , ould ''feasibility study be 4nstplred, evaluafrrg,drivew The ETC reiterateupport for recommendation i4a ed on this principles and would rgalke�a good The ETC will create an , Janovy will complete and for the`side tilting trees onnaire C the the i could be shifted slightly to better than 5' boulevard creates too much Intersections on Crescent will be ng approximately $140,000. c is 1700. The cos Would be split between the additional assessment\Y�& ld include all residents le ETC's recommendatio : to add sidewalks. ISidered ' create pedtaI and bicycle safe easb�abI that they are being�nsidered for any t \r\esi ents should address this policy to educate irk,\ :and school near to the project area. do we Implement it, what are the priorities nd then\l \o at when reconstructing area? ation for,.pddrity sidewalks be opportunity driven? ng sources; but also have time -lines that we have side. a s end at Tracy do we need to look at additional Iks shoo d be placed. 3alk? \From staff perspective, felt the sidewalk could be and -place sidewalk on most appropriate side. ks as -shown on page 9 of 12 of the feasibility report. Their ng in a school zone, near a City park, consistent with Living Streets ion for any future sidewalk along Valley View Road. unication to forward to Council as part of the public hearing. Chair I will review. Bass moved to create an Advisory Communication for the Countryside project, seconded by Schol Davis, the motion passed. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Minutes \2012 Minutes \MINUTES for January 9, 2012—Special Meeting.doar REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VI.B. From: Jesse Struve, PE Utility Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Public Hearing — Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvement BA -388, Resolution No. 2012 -19. ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2012 -19 accepting the feasibility study and approving Richmond Hills Park Roadway Improvement, Improvement No. BA -388, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff initiated this project. The proposed project involves reconstructing the existing roadway, adding or replacing curb and gutter, replacement of the water main, and upgrades to the sanitary and storm sewer systems. The overall project cost is estimated at $6,583,000, which includes City owned utility repairs and replacement. Funding for the roadway cost will be from a special assessment of 100% of the roadway cost. All City owned utility repairs will be from the respective utility funds. Staff and our consultant SEH Inc. has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -19 Feasibility Study: BA -388 Draft January 9, 2012 Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA388 Richmond Hills Park(2012) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY\PUBLIC HEARINGS \Item VI. B. PH Richmond Hills Park Res 2012- 19.docx RESOLUTION NO.2012 -19 RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR RICHMOND HILLS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -388 WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council, adopted the 20th day of December, 2011, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA -388, the proposed• improvement of Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Street Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given., and the hearing was held thereon on the ,1.7`d day of January, 2012, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: January 17, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I; the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution .was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk l 0 V A rte FEASIBILITY STUDY — BA -388 o G ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Ear n t �y� CITY OF EDINA RICHMOND HILLS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS January 3, 2012 LOCATION: The project area includes Normandale Court, Yvonne Terrace (Normandale Road to 56th Street), 56th Street (Normandale Road to Code Avenue), Warwick Place (56th Street to Kent Avenue), Kent Avenue (Normandale Road to Windsor Avenue), Windsor Avenue (Normandale Road to Cul -De -Sac), Richmond Drive (Normandale Road to Code Avenue), Code Avenue (56th Street to Richmond Drive), Richmond Lane and Richmond Circle. The drawing below is a detailed project location map of the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements. MIMCI PROJECT LOCATION iHVUr one ■ . .. ..� ■.■w.■■.... .........a ' S w I H Me. 1 S(]I. it IfN /........4* .......... 1-rr ......... ....../ INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by the City's Engineering and Utility Departments as part of the City's street reconstruction program and Capital Improvement Program to update aging street infrastructure. Included in the Appendix of this study are the results of a property owner questionnaire (questionnaire) the City sent to the project area on September 28, 2011. 115 of the 173 questionnaires sent were completed and returned. Comprehensive Plan Figures 7.10 and 7.11 in this study's Appendix are from the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. The figures show that sidewalk and bicycle trails are not proposed in the project area. Figure 13.3 in the Appendix is from the City's 2011 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. This figure identifies a low area that exists in the backyards of 5213 and 5217 Richwood Drive that has the potential to cause flooding during storm events. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS: The majority of the neighborhood's streets and public utilities were constructed from the early 1950's to the early 1960's. Streets The neighborhood's existing streets are surfaced with bituminous pavement. Patches, overlays, and sections of alligator cracking are present at random locations throughout the project area as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 - Looking East on Kent Avenue towards Normandale Road The streets vary in width between 26 feet and 30 feet. While the pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood, it is generally in poor condition. In 2010, City street crews completed a thin overlay patch along Richmond Drive, Richmond Lane and Code Avenue due to failed pavement conditions and to prevent city plows from inadvertently gouging chunks of bituminous and throwing them towards vehicles, homes and boulevards. Approximately 44% of the streets in the project area have concrete curb and gutter, and 60% of this existing concrete curb and gutter is in poor condition. As part of this study, 15 soil borings were taken in the project area. The borings identified shallow fill and predominantly glacial till soils consisting of silty sand, clayey sand, and sandy lean clay beneath the street pavement. A visual review of the base material layer beneath the bituminous pavement indicated the material may not meet MnDOT criteria for an aggregate base course. The absence of an adequate aggregate base layer contributes to the visible distresses in the street surface. The existing geometry of the intersections at Windsor Avenue and Kent Avenue and at Warwick Place and Kent Avenue creates large surface areas of pavement, intersection corners with long radius curb - lines, and possible Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 3 encroachment onto private property at 5516 Warwick Place. This existing geometry allows vehicles to comfortably maneuver through the intersection at speeds higher than typical or desirable for conventional intersections. This situation can lead to diminished pedestrian crossing safety and requires additional city resources during snow removal operations. The existing geometric configuration of the intersection is shown in Figure 2. aoa, 5056 XISTING I ISTING IVEWAY 5046 5044 5103 StG ND -- — GUTTER 'KENT AVE ENCROACHMENT _ 1 ' , 5516 a \Gy P 5517 5041 5520 Figure 2 - Existing Geometric Configuration at the Windsor Avenue /Kent Avenue and Kent Avenue/Warwick Place Intersections There is one (1) driveway featuring brick paver blocks in the project area. Twenty (20) decorative landscaping features are located in the right -of -way (ROW) in the project area. Figure 3 depicts the brick paver driveway and a typical landscaping feature found in the project area's right -of -way. h 5105 Richmond Drive — Paver Driveway 5113 Richmond Drive — Landscaping Feature Figure 3 Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 4 Storm Sewer In addition to the storm sewer pipe conveying runoff from the intersection of Code Avenue and 56th Street, Melody Lake also receives runoff from a storm sewer pipe in Melody Lake Drive serving the neighborhood south and west of Melody Lake. Based on the City's closed- circuit television inspections of these two (2) pipes, separated joints and root infiltration are present in each of these pipes between Code Avenue and Melody Lake. A natural ridge aligned north -south just west of Normandale Road divides storm water that falls on the project area. Storm water falling. east of this ridge flows overland east to existing storm sewer inlets and pipe along Normandale Road. The runoff is conveyed by this storm sewer to a storm sewer interceptor pipe under,Hwy 100 and eventually into Minnehaha Creek. Storm water falling west of the ridge flows overland along the street edges, a concrete valley gutter in Richmond Lane, bituminous valley gutters at other intersections, and along concrete curb and gutter to storm sewer pipes and inlets on Yvonne Terrace and at the intersection of 56th Street and Code Avenue. These pipes convey the runoff into Melody Lake. At. Normandale Court, storm water falling west of the ridge flows overland along the street edges to storm sewer pipes and inlets near Normandale Court's cul -de -sac Terrace. These pipes also convey the runoff into Melody Lake. Storm water runoff travels 2 to 3 times further overland in the neighborhood than the recommended maximum distance of 500 feet before entering an inlet. This longer distance causes runoff to pool along the edges of many of the streets or at select intersections. Thirty -five (35) residents reported storm water runoff pooling problems via the questionnaire. Below is a list of worst locations of pooling runoff. • The intersection of Richmond Circle and Richmond Drive. • The intersection of Windsor Avenue and Kent Avenue • The intersection of Windsor Avenue and Code Avenue • Temporary street flooding during storm events occurs in the street at 5045 Yvonne Terrace and at the intersection of 56th Street and Warwick Place due to a less than recommended number of catch basins. • Runoff leaving the edge of the 56th Street and flowing up the driveway and into the front yard of 5532 Code Avenue. Storm water runoff is only .marginally conveyed by the neighborhood's valley gutters and longitudinal street.slopes to the existing storm sewer pipe network on 56th Street. A low area exists in the backyards of 52,13 and 5217 Richwood Drive.-.The area is across the Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks opposite the Windsor Avenue cul- de -sac. Because the area's natural outfall for pooling runoff is° higher,than the elevation of the lowest entrances into both .5213 and 5217. 'Richwood Drive, during large storms, the potential exists to flood 5213 and 5217 Richw,00d Drive. The low area is shown in Figure 4. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 5 RICHWOW DR i axu $217 EICSTNG ' EOP 1 E 1$ �AFt EA \XSE�ER EIOSTMG •NIEIIYAIN� ovoaA AVE - -- I JIR TIAOCS WAND" y� Y Sol Figure 4 - Existing Low Area at 5213/5217 Richwood Drive Figure 5 below shows the intersection of Windsor Avenue and Kent Avenue and the resultant stormwater pooling during a recent rain event. Figure 5 — Pooling Runoff at the intersection of Windsor Avenue and Kent Avenue Looking Northeast Fifty -two (52) home owners told us they operate sump pumps via returned questionnaires. They use these pumps to discharge ground water away from their homes. In most cases, their pumps discharge the ground water into their yards or an adjacent street. The discharges either seep back towards their, or their neighbor's home, or pool along street edges. Trunk Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Pipes Trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipe materials are cast iron and clay pipe respectively. The trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipes were constructed from the early 1950's to the early 1960's. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 6 Six -inch (6 ") diameter trunk water main pipes serve the neighborhood. The valves and fire hydrants along the trunk water main pipe are operable. Drawing No. 1 in the Appendix shows that since 1989, when the City began documenting its trunk water main pipe and City -owned water service pipe breaks, there have been seventeen (17) trunk water main pipe and City -owned water service pipe break and leak repairs. Trunk water main pipe was never installed along Richmond Lane or along Kent Avenue between Warwick Place and Windsor Avenue. While fire fighting needs are satisfactory without these missing trunk pipes, fire fighting is not optimal. Additionally, the missing pipes cause the water service pipes at 5101 Windsor Avenue and 5048 Kent Avenue to be twice the recommended length. Nine -inch (9 ") and ten -inch (10 ") diameter trunk sanitary sewer pipes serve the neighborhood. Based on the City's closed- circuit television inspections of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes, twelve (12) areas have been identified with problems including; cracked pipe, sagging pipe, collapsed pipe and offset joints. In addition to the twelve identified problems, multiple joint locations along the pipe showed extensive root infiltration into the trunk main pipe. Figure 6 below shows extensive root infiltration and a cracked pipe location. Richmond Drive — Root Infiltration Windsor Avenue — Cracked Pipe Figure 6 Private Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Service Pipes While construction and maintenance records are not available for these pipes, they are the same age as the trunk pipes. The service pipes are likely in a condition similar to the trunk pipes. Water main service pipes within the neighborhood are copper pipes and vary in diameter. Sanitary sewer service pipes are likely 6 -inch diameter clay pipes. Based on their age, the City should expect that cracks and separated joints have developed along these pipes similar to the trunk main. These faults in the pipe facilitate tree root intrusion and the inflow and infiltration of clear ground water into the City's sanitary sewer network. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 7 Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric, telephone and cable television utilities all have infrastructure in the neighborhood. These utilities are either overhead on poles or buried underground both within and outside of the street right -of -way (ROW). The gas main trunk and service pipes are made of steel. Forty -four (44) residents told us they own and operate either an underground pet containment or lawn irrigation system within the project boulevards. Residential Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks The neighborhood's roadway light network consists of standard cobra head lights mounted on wood poles. These lights are typically located at intersections. A sidewalk / secondary bicycle route is present along the west side of Normandale Road at the east edge of the project. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The project involves installing concrete curb and gutter and reconstructing the bituminous pavement. It also involves extending the existing storm sewer pipe network and connecting sump pump drain pipe to the storm sewer pipe. The sump pump drain pipe will allow property owners to discharge ground water from their sump pumps into the trunk storm sewer pipe network. The project will also involve reconstructing the trunk water main and trunk sanitary sewer pipe. The scope of the water main, sanitary and storm sewer reconstruction will meet the following parameters. • Protect boulevard trees. • Provide continuous sewer and water service to residents. • Maintain pedestrian and vehicle access in the neighborhood. • Reconstruct private sanitary sewer service pipes between the sanitary sewer trunk pipe and right -of -way (ROW) line. -- - -- . Encourage propert y owners to reconstruct_ their private sanitary sewer- service pipe between the ROW line and their homes prior to construction. • Reconstruct the City -owned water service pipe between the trunk water main pipe and curb stop box. Reconstruction should also include replacing all of the curb stops. • Encourage property owners to reconstruct their private water main service pipes between the curb stop and their homes. Streets The project will reconstruct the streets with a bituminous surface to approximately their existing widths. The project will recycle and mix the existing bituminous street pavement and the minor amounts of aggregate base below it Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 8 together to form a material suitable to replace poor subgrade soils. The project will also recycle the segments of Richmond Drive, Richmond Lane and Code Avenue that received the thin overlay patch in 2010. The thin overlay patch will increase the quality of the recycled material. All of the streets in the project will receive a new layer of aggregate base prior to the installation of the new bituminous pavement. The project will remove and replace all of the sections of existing concrete curb and gutter. Since a majority of the existing concrete curb and gutter is in poor condition, spot repairs are not as cost effective for the City as complete removal and replacement. New concrete curb and gutter and concrete driveway aprons are proposed for all the streets whether it is present today or not. As shown in Figure 7, the project will reduce the curb radii at the intersection of Windsor Avenue and Kent Avenue and at the intersection of Warwick Place and Kent Avenue. These reductions will reduce turning vehicular speeds, make vehicle turns more deliberate for drivers and predictable for pedestrians, eliminate the possible encroachment onto private property at 5516 Warwick Place, and decrease the amount of future maintenance performed by the City at these intersections. The project will likely install a low berm with trees atop it in the right -of -way (ROW) in front of 5048 Kent Avenue. The berm and trees will minimize the amount of possible vehicle headlight glare into 5048 Kent Avenue from traffic travelling northbound on Warwick Place. The project will extend affected driveways and boulevards at these reduced intersections to match the proposed curb lines. The orientation of the proposed house at 5517 Warwick Place will be taken into account when determining the final location of its driveway at the reduced intersection. Figure 7 – Proposed Geometric Configuration at Windsor Avenue /Kent Avenue Intersection and Kent AvenuefWarwick Place Intersection t� ` STING ..,� DRIVEWAY OOia yH, PROPCI5�D-/ CURB /lND1.. -a 5i0J GUTTER t / S,m i Posse E —` Y i KENT AVE ENCROACHMENT ROPOSED _ —_ _ ROPOSED DRIVEWAY •��G`� BOULEVARD EXTENSIO% P 5570 EXTENSION 5517 50/, Figure 7 – Proposed Geometric Configuration at Windsor Avenue /Kent Avenue Intersection and Kent AvenuefWarwick Place Intersection Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 9 Storm Sewer Wherever possible the project will mitigate pooling storm water runoff along street edges and intersections by both installing concrete curb and gutter along all neighborhood streets and extending the existing storm sewer pipe network at 56th Street and Warwick Place north to Kent Avenue, Windsor Avenue, Code Avenue and Richmond Drive. The project will correct the list of worst locations of pooling runoff given on page 4 of this study as follows. • The intersection of Richmond Circle and Richmond Drive will receive storm sewer catch basins. • The intersection of Windsor Avenue and Kent Avenue will receive storm sewer catch basins. • The intersection of Windsor Avenue and Code Avenue will receive storm sewer catch basins. • 5045 Yvonne Terrace and the intersection of 56th Street and Warwick Place will receive additional storm sewer catch basins. • The project will extend concrete curb and gutter and a driveway apron along the 56th Street frontage of 5532 Code Avenue to capture runoff before it leaves the edge of the 56th Street. The project will install one (1) storm water runoff treatment manhole each in the street near 5045 Yvonne Terrace and at the intersection of Code Avenue and Melody Lake Drive. These special manholes remove most of the sandy sediment and floatable debris from storm water runoff before it enters the existing storm sewer trunk pipe that flows directly to Melody Lake. The 2 storm sewer pipes between Code Avenue and Melody Lake, that convey runoff into Melody Lake from the intersection of Code Avenue and 56th Street and from Melody Lake Drive, will be removed and replaced with a single combined pipe still out letting directly to Melody Lake. Because the Windsor Avenue cul -de -sac is at a lower elevation than the low area in the backyards of 5213 and 5217 Richwood Drive, the project offers an opportunity to drain runoff trapped in the low area at 5213 and 5217 Richwood Drive. As shown in Figure 8, a storm sewer pipe will be installed by trenchless methods beneath the Canadian Pacific Railroad. The storm sewer pipe will outlet into the boulevard at the west end of the Windsor Avenue cul -de -sac. The runoff will flow across the boulevard into Windsor Avenue and flow overland to proposed storm sewer inlets at the intersection of Windsor Avenue and Code Avenue. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 10 DR =3 EMTM Lft E%IST''NG AKA 1�7ARI f TERy AWC� Sim NK / OW-AM to � ow AVE .(1/51MGJ L__ 7RACKS - /., WNDSOR A !7„ j Figure 8 Proposed Storm Sewer at 5213/5217 Richwood Drive The project will install one storm sewer catch basin manhole with a two -foot sump at 5020 Normandale Court. This City standard manhole will serve to catch additional sediment from storm water runoff before it enters the existing storm sewer trunk pipe that flows directly into Melody Lake. The project will address ground water flow issues by installing a 6 -inch sump drain trunk pipe behind the concrete curb and gutter throughout the majority of the project wherever it is feasible. This pipe allows the property owner to connect their sump pump discharge service pipes to the storm sewer pipe network. Such connections prevent their sump pumps from discharging back into their yards or an adjacent street. A 4 -inch service line pipe will be installed towards the ROW line in front of the resident's home from the sump drain trunk pipe. From their ROW line, the resident is responsible for installing an underground pipe and any plumbing modifications needed to connect it to their sump pump or footing drain at their own cost using their own contractor. Trunk Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Pipes Even though fewer breaks and leaks have been repaired south of 56th Street; they are the same age as those installed north of 56th Street in similar subgrade soils. The City anticipates the frequency of break and leak repairs to increase during the life of the proposed street pavement both south and north of 56th Street. Rather than make frequent excavations through the proposed pavement and concrete curb and gutter, the City will take advantage of street reconstruction to reconstruct the entire trunk water main pipe network and City -owned water service pipes and curb stop boxes. r e' Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 11 Due to the depth and location of the trunk water main pipes, traditional open cut pipe reconstruction methods involving the excavation of a trench will be used on a limited basis in non - sensitive areas. Limiting the use of open cut method will protect boulevard trees and landscaping. The project will reconstruct 80% of the trunk water main trunk pipe network using a trenchless reconstruction method called pipe bursting. The project will increase the size of the trunk water main pipe from six -inch to eight -inch diameter along Richmond Circle as recommended by the American Water Works Association for dead end trunk water main pipe conditions. New trunk water main pipe will be installed between Richmond. Drive and Windsor Avenue along Richmond Lane and along Kent Avenue between Windsor Avenue and Warwick Place. By installing these pipes, the City will optimize water flow for fire fighting in the neighborhood and decrease the length of service pipes to 5101 Windsor Avenue and 5048 Kent Avenue to acceptable lengths. Drawing No. 2 in the Appendix shows the proposed combination of open cut and pipe bursting reconstruction methods to be deployed in this project. During the reconstruction of the trunk water main pipe, residents will have continuous water service. Temporary water main and service pipes will be strung out on the ground along the boulevards and front yards of the neighborhood's streets. These temporary pipes are connected to sections of the existing water main already, or not yet, reconstructed. Continuous water service is provided to each home via its outside garden hose spigot. The contractor will need access into each home in the neighborhood to make a proper temporary water main connection. The project will replace all of the existing fire hydrants with new City standard hydrants. The project will move hydrants that are too close to an edge of a driveway pavement to the nearest boulevard location adjacent to side -yard property lines. The project will add hydrants in locations where the distance between the existing hydrants exceeds the recommended 500 -foot spacing. The project will reconstruct the trunk sanitary sewer pipes using a trenchless reconstruction method called cured in place pipe lining. Spot repairs will be made to the trunk sanitary sewer pipes that have sagged, cracked or where offset joints occur. The City's closed circuit televsion inspections provide the exact locations of these repairs. Wherever necessary, the repairs will be completed using open cut repair methods. In sensitive locations, repairs will be completed using trenchless repair methods. Private Utilities CenterPoint Energy reports that they want to take advantage of street reconstruction in the project area to upgrade their steel gas trunk main and service pipes to plastic pipe. The City would coordinate this upgrade with CenterPoint Energy prior to the start of street reconstruction. The City will repair any damage to privately -owned pet containment and irrigation utilities caused by street and City utility reconstruction activities. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 12 Private Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Service Pipes Reconstructing the trunk water main pipe using pipe bursting method destroys the connection between the City -owned water service pipe and the trunk water main pipe. A small excavation is needed to restore this connection. The City will take advantage of this excavation, make it larger, and reconstruct the entire City - owned water service pipe including the curb stop box, labeled A and E, respectively in Figure 9 below. Figure 9 — Typical Section Showing Utility Ownership Because CenterPoint Energy will reconstruct its gas main and service pipes that are beneath the neighborhood's streets, the only non - reconstructed existing utility that will remain beneath the new streets are the private sanitary sewer service pipes. To protect the investment in new streets made by the property owners and the City, the City will reconstruct with this project each private sanitary sewer service pipe labeled Segment C in Figure 9. Figure 9 also shows the limits of the service pipes owned by the property owners. Reconstructing the service pipes to these limits with this project mitigates the opportunity for future potential damage to the new street surface due to future private sanitary sewer service pipe repairs. Furthermore, property owners would not have to pay the cost to patch the new street while accomplishing a future repair. Because the City will reconstruct Segment C with this project, residents can avoid potential future blockages and eliminate the inflow and infiltration of clear ground water along the balance of their sanitary sewer service pipe by reconstructing Segment D at their own cost using their own contractor. Based on the City's experiences reconstructing private sanitary sewer service pipes during the Country Club Area's Sewer Water and Street Reconstruction Project during 2008 and 2009 and the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Project during 2010, the City believes property owners in Richmond Hills Park may discover it costs about the same amount to have their r ii Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 13 own contractor reconstruct Segments C & D. as it does for the City's contractor to reconstruct only Segment C. Residents should take advantage of the coming disruptions in the neighborhood caused by the project and complete their service pipe reconstruction work before the City's contractor begins their work. This schedule for the residents is necessary to maximize the progress of the City's contractor. If a property owner chooses to reconstruct Segment C of their private sanitary sewer service pipe, 'the City will allow the property owner's plumber to leave a temporary patch in the street pavement and temporarily restore the City -owned boulevard. During street reconstruction, the City's contractor would complete the final restoration of the street pavement and City -owned boulevard. If a resident chooses to reconstruct Segment D of their sanitary sewer service pipe, it would likely be the best time to also reconstruct Segment B of their water service pipe at their own cost using their own contractor. Because the sanitary sewer and water service pipes are likely near each other, a resident can usually reconstruct both of these service pipes to their home by excavating only one trench across their yard. Furthermore, a resident will likely realize a cost savings if they reconstruct both of these service pipes simultaneously, versus reconstructing each service pipe separately. If a resident has reconstructed their private service pipe(s) within approximately the past 15 years, there is probably no need for that resident to again reconstruct their service pipe(s) now. Residents can discover whether or not their service pipe(s) have been reconstructed by contacting the City's Building Department. Options do exist for residents to reconstruct both of their service pipes across their yards with minimal digging. Residents can use the new trenchless pipe reconstruction methods the City intends to use to reconstruct its trunk water main and sanitary sewer, pipes. While these options can be more expensive to accomplish, they can protect a resident's landscaping, sidewalk, or driveway that may be located above both of the service pipes. At the November 29, 2011 informational meeting, neighborhood property owners were encouraged to reconstruct Segments B, C and D before the City's reconstruction project begins. In an effort to facilitate this reconstruction work by the property owners, the City made available to property owners at the informational meeting a Plumbers Questionnaire Summary dated November 29, 2011. That summary is included in the Appendix of this study. Residential Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks The questionnaire asked if the project area wanted to reconstruct the street lights and add a sidewalk to the project area. The results report that the project area's property owners do not want to reconstruct the street lights or add a sidewalk to the project area. These items are not included in the proposed improvements. At their December 15 meeting, the Edina Transportation Commission recommended not extending sidewalks in the project area. . RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate ROW exists to implement this project. Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 14 EASEMENTS PROJECT COSTS: ASSESSMENTS Easement acquisition is not anticipated to reconstruct this project area. The total estimated project cost is $6,583,000 (2012 Dollars). The estimated total project cost is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of Total Estimated Project Cost ITEM ESTIMATED COST 2 ASSESSMENT' CITY RESIDENTS Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe $1,020,000 Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Between the Trunk Pipe and the Right -Of -Way line' Total $573,000 Water Main Trunk Pipe and Service Pipe Up To and Including Curb Stop Box $1,490,000 Storm Sewer $1,200,000 Street Reconstruction $2,300,000 Sub -total $3,710,000 $2,873,000. Total $6,583,000 ' Cost to be assessed to residents 2 Costs are given in 2012 dollars The total estimated cost includes indirect costs for engineering and clerical and finance costs from the start of construction to the final assessment hearing. An estimated special assessment rate of approximately $16,800 (2012 Dollars) per residential equivalent unit (REU) is proposed to be levied against the property owners in the project area. There are 171 REU's in the project area. The estimated total assessment rate is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Summary of Total Estimated Assessment Rates per REU ITEM ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT' Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Between the Trunk Pipe , $3,400 and the Right -Of -Way line Street Reconstruction $13,400 Total $16,800. ' - Assessment rate is given in 2012 dollars Drawing No. 3 in the Appendix of this study summarizes the application of the estimated assessment rates. According to City policy,. properties that abut the project but their addresses are not included in the project are either not assessed due to past assessments or assessed at either 1/3 or 2/3 of the estimated rate. No 1/3 or 2/3 assessments are proposed for this project. The City will consider deducting that. portion of the assessment rate for the sanitary sewer service pipe repair if the resident: Feasibility Study Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 3, 2012 Page 15 • Repairs, using their own contractor, their own private sanitary sewer service pipe between at least the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and ROW line before reconstruction is underway, or • Reconstructed their sanitary sewer service pipe between at least the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and ROW line with PVC pipe or by use of trenchless methods in the last 15 years. A copy of the preliminary assessment roll is included in the Appendix. FEASIBILITY: City staff and its consulting engineer believe the improvements are necessary, cost- effective, and feasible from an engineering stand point. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The estimated schedule shown in Table 3 is feasible from an Engineering standpoint. Table 3 Project Schedule Event Date Pavement Rehabilitation Open House September 13, 2011 Neighborhood Informational Meeting November 29, 2011 Public Improvement Hearing January 17, 2012 Bid Opening March 2012 Award Contract April 2012 Begin Construction May 2012 Complete Construction Fall 2012 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2013 - this page left intentionally blank - APPENDIX Figure 7.10 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.11 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Bicycle Facilities Figure 13.3 City of Edina 2011 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan — Low Area at- - 5213 and 5217 Richwood Drive Drawing No. 1 City of Edina Richmond Hills Park Water Main & Service Breaks Drawing No. 2 Water Main Reconstruction Drawing No. 3 Assessment Summary ➢ Certification Page ➢ Local Street Reconstruction Program Open House Invitation dated September 7, 2010 ➢ Local Street Reconstruction Program Open House Invitation dated August 30, 2011 ➢ Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements - Resident Questionnaire Transmittal Letter and Questionnaire dated September 28, 2011 ➢ Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Property Owner Questionnaire Results Summary as of November 3, 2011 ➢ Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting Invitation dated November 16, 2010 ➢ Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting Attendance Roster dated November 29, 2011 ➢ List of Questions asked by Residents and answers provided at the November 29, 2011 Informational Meeting ➢ Plumbers Questionnaire Summary Provided to Residents at the November 29, 2011 Informational Meeting ➢ Preliminary Assessment Roll ➢ Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Improvements Explanation of Conflicting Estimated Special Assessment Rate Amounts dated December 28, 2011 ➢ Notice of Public Improvement Hearing dated December 28, 2011 - this page left intentionally blank - LEGEND: Existinngg Proposed School I Proposed Note: Park Palhways are Included on Figure 7.f I Sidevralk Business S!dewalk State-AM Sldewatt °AA_"''1T City of Edina Update 2008 Comprehensive Plan U ,9 p p u4 Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.10 - this page left intentionally blank - B a a LEGEND: Existing Existing Hennepin PI, sod From the 2007 Edina Comprehensive Bicycle 7ranspodatlon Plan Park Pathway County Corbors P81 POIWay I I , T j Pfimary Roue .. . • Secondary Route City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Bicycle Facilities Figure 7.11 - this page left intentionally blank - �RIGWAIOND . PIR � MOOD 44 14W Aga WINDSOR- AVE 513TI-I - ST W Figure 13.3 SOUTHEAST MINNEHAHA CREEK HYDRAULIC MODEL RESULTS Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan City of Edina, Minnesota City of Edina Boundary Potential Flooding During Roads/Highways 100-Year Frequency Event Cfeek/Strearn Pipes mao0y LakefWelland Manhole La� Minnehaha Creek - Manhole Surcharge During 0 Southeast Drainage Basin 1100-Year Frequency Event Manhole Surcharged During Subwatershed 10-Year Frequency Event - this page left intentionally blank - � o 1a i _ m o O w�ivivivVK S � ernu i �iL 53 5252 5256 5260 5245 5241 5400 5051 24 OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH R�CHVIOOD DR 5z64 5405 !w 5268 5108 5104 5020 5012 5008 5245 5249 5253 5408 5048 5044 5040 5036 5032 5028 5024 5016 1 5241 5052 c 5257 5412 O24 5112 C-) 1 2 52oa oP 5100 pR 1 5216 5212 5208 P�� 5124 5120 5116 ���f, R\CNMONp i 5201 \�\GQ 128 - 5401 5041 5037 5029 5025 5021 5017 5011 500 r ± 1 5205 SIR I 1 5209 �PQ�F 5400 t 5405 5040 5036 5032 5028 5024 5020 5016 5012 500 1 I22 5221 5217 GP 132 5117 5113 5109 5105 �� \O 1 5213 \� WINDSOR -AVE 1 of 53A 5300 5208 5204 5200 5120 5112 5108 5104 5100 5053 5049 045 5041 5037 5033 5029 5021 5017 500950051 1 ¢� 24 of 5301 5056 < 5217 5213 5209 5205 5201 SO4B 5044 5036 5028 5020 12 5004' p� 5117 5113 5109 105 5103 5032 5024 16 I 7f 5101 J 1 5520 Q �KENTAVE w 5517 5516 � 1 5524 O 5041 5037 5033 5029 5025 5017 5013 `SM 1 15228 5224 5220 5216 5212 5208 U 5521 5520 5517 5528 .. V 1 —_ _ _ � — 1 3 5008 50,. 1 - -- �- — -- � 553= 5525 510 5524 8 5104 5048 5040 5036 5032 5028 5020 5016 5012 1 56TH'STw - 1 5601 5221 5217 5213 5209 5201 1 5109 5105 5600 W29 5601 5041 5037 W33 � 5025 5021 5017 1 5013 5009 5005 , 5603 "/ 5604 5600 �% 5053 5040 5036 5032 5028 5024 5020 5016 5012 5008 5004 , 5605 5608 24 �� CODE AVE 5049 YVONNE'TER 1 5612 24 5045 5605 5604 5025 5021 5017 5013 5009 5005 1 °o 5613 5615 5605 24 5041 5037 sa2s ; o 0 5617 5608 0� 5016 5D12 5008 5004 5517 1 5620 5018 1 = 5621 5612 �� 5609 5717 1 a 57TH ST W 5701 5616 5713 5721 5701 5700 5020 5025 5009 i1 1 MF�o o 1 Legend 5712 �YCq 5725 MELODY LAKE 5024 5029 Service Break 5715 5724 28 5033 1 0 Water Main Break 5729 5100 50� � 5728 Existing Trunk 5733 5032 Water Main 50 1 4 5120 11111111 -jIIIIIIIIIA Mai + 5110 -- 24 GROVE ST 5805 5801 5213 5209 5205 5201 5121 5117 5113 � 5109 5105 5101 5801 5809 Richmond Hills Park Project J Drawing EDINA118570 Water Main Neighborhood Roadway Improvements No. ?�E✓: No. BA -388 Print Date and Service SEH Edina, Minnesota 12/15/2011 Breaks - this page left intentionally blank - b sN i 5' 5252 5256 5260 5245 F 5241 5400 5051 2 5264 5405 OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH R�rHWOOD DR 5404 >•r s art• �,• M M M s M ' 5268 5245 5249 5253 5408 5108 5104 5044 5040 5036 5032'5028 5024 "20 5016 5012 5008 ' 5241 5257 24 I 5112 �l _ 5412 pPS) Cy 5100 5216 5212 5208 5204 5201 G�P�� 5124 5720 5116 5029 5025 5021 5017 5011 5005 / 128 1 5041 5037 ' 5205 �0 5209 P�\P , 5400 5040 5036 5032 5028 5024 5020 5016 5012 5008 f5221 5217 GP` 132 5113 5109 5105 yp �� 5117 5404 5213 WINDSOR�AVE 3 5300 5208 5204 5200 5120 5112 5108 5104 5100 X5045 5041 5037 W29 5021 5017 09 OS ¢� -- - 24 �J 5301 / 4 ##0 5056 5217 5213 5209 5205 15201 r�48 5044 5036 5028 5020 12 5004 0 5117 5113 5109 105 5103 5032 5024 5016 5008, �� m m oo W 5101 _ sszo a —. KENVAVE ' W 5517 5516 - - 5524 O v " 5517 5041 5037 5033 5029 5025 5017 5013 5009 ' 5228 5224 5220 5216 5212 5208 5521 5520 ssza CS — 55 5532 5525 5108 5104 24 5048 5040 50M 5032 5028 5020 5016 5012 5008 5004 ' 5601 5221 5213 5209 5201 5109 5105 5600 MffiolW415037 `5033 5029 5025 5021 5017 5 ' 5217 -- - 5603 �� �� `,, 5053 5040 5036 5032 5028 5024 5020 5016 5012 5008 5004 ' 5sos �� 24 ,+ CODE AVE 5 049 YVOIJNE`TER ' - -- 5609 5612 5045 24 5025 5021 5017 5013 5009 5005 , °o 5029 ' 5613 5616 5605 24 5041 5037 5016 ' o _ 5617 5608 O� 5012 f008 5004 5018 5617 5620 y� ; w 5621 5612 509 5717 57TH ST W O� ~ 5713 5721 ' Legend 5020 IR. 5025 5009 - 4 Reconstruct Pipe Using Y� 5725 MELODY LAKE 5024 5029 '1 / '�— Pipe Burst Methods � °'• I, / pn X24 5033 Reconstruct Pipe Using 5729 5100 50i 5032 / Open -Cut Methods 5733 / New Pipe Using 5036 / Open -Cut Methods MMMMMM .� 5114 5110 24 GROVE ST 5805 5801 5213 5209 5205 5201 1 5121 5117 5113 5109 5105 5101 5801 09 Richmond Hills Park Project Neighborhood Roadway Improvements EDINA118570 Water Main Drawing `) SEH No. BA -388 Print Date Reconstruction o Edina, Minnesota 12/15/2011 2 - this page left intentionally blank - J o i N - a 5252 5256 5260 5245 5241 5400 r 5264 5405 5051 R\CNWOOD DR OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH \ 5404 fi � � 7 � 5268 5108 5104 1 r�gOti5036 5071,5078 5012 5008 1 5024 5016 5245 5249 5253 5408 �\ _ 5052y 5044 I 5241 5257 44 5112 ` ` 1 5412 � 5204 QOP� 5120\ "�~ \C��y��5100`y -O -- — 1 2 5216 5212 5208 5201 \GQP���� 5124 5116 OZO (Z�C'� r�37 5o� 5029 x5025 5021 5017 `5011 1 5005 1 X5128 504+ 1 5205 �QP`� � 5401 ` 1N ___ 5209 P�\P I 5400 y� `� 5024 .22 5221 5217 GPI 132 5113.5109 " 5105 �0y'� 5405 T `' 040 `�36 50325028 502015016 5012 5006 1 5213 _ __ --- 5117 �_ _.___ __r, 5404 �! 1._._..1 --- __ .__. I 1 --7 WINDSOR AVE 1 o 5 `5300 5208 5204 5200 5120 511215108 5104 5100 —1 l 504 55041 5037 5033 5029 5021 5017 5009 051 Ca — - _ / \5053 0 24 5301 � 5056 }"` -- � 5217 5213 52055201 5117 5113 5109) 105f 5103 ��� 5048 �� 5036 5032 5028 5024 50205016 12 OS fit• — - w / 5101 w KENT AVE o 5517 5516 ;- _.S - j � 5524 O ._...,. 1 5517 + 5041 5037' 5033 5029 5025 5017 5013 5009 1 5228 5224 5220 5216 5212 5208 U 5521 5520 Qv l _� �..- _ _ _­_ _ } 1 5528 - _' ` T _ I 5524 �J 5048 5pg0'5036 5032 5028 `5020 T5016 5012 500 5004 1 - -_ 5532 5525 5108 { 5104 i 1 �■ 56TH ST W 1 -- - - Toll 1 5601 5221 5213 5209 5201 f 5109 5105 5600 5601 1 5041 1 5037 ; 5033 5029 S0� 5021 5017 5013 5009 5005 1 5217 1 - tr - 5603 - ^5053 t 0 5036 5032 5028 5024 5020 5016 5012 5008 5004 1 5608 �� 5600 —_� - - — - 5605 CODE AVE 24 �% 5049/ YVONNE TER , 5609 24 �� � - - -- �� 5025 5021 5017 1 5013 5009 J 5005 1 5612 � - -- 5605 5604 1 I 5613 5616 �m 5605 2'— 5041 �� __ -- 5617 5608 �p 5016 5012 a 5006 50°4 � 1 5617 5620 5018 , 5621 5612 5609 5717 / \ 1 57TH ST W 1 � 5701 5700 570 5616 5713 5721 ` � ' 5020 5 r \5025 }5009 ', 1 Legend �I 1 REU -Estimated $16,800 Assessment 5725 MELODY LAKE X24 %�`92Q� ' Lam' (2012 Dollars) / y 5724 5028 5033 i Not Assessed 5729 5100 / 1 5032 Project Limits '� ■ 1 ��77 ■ 5036 j 0 0 O z x w 5725 1 5724 J I I I I I L -- 05 24 GROVE ST 5605 5801 5213 5209 5205 5201 5121 5117 5113 5109 5105 5101 5801 Richmond Hills Park Project Drawing Neighborhood Roadway Improvements EDINA 118570 Assessment No. SEH No. BA -388 Pnnt Date Summary 3 Edina, Minnesota 1211512011 - this page left intentionally blank - FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA -388 RICHMOND HILLS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SEH No. EDINA 118570 January 3, 2012 hereby certify that this report was prepared -by me or under my direct supervision, and that [ am a duly Licensed 'Professional Engineer under the Jaws of the State of Minnesota Date: Reviewed by:. �e/ ® Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 - 9301 952.912.2600 - this page left intentionally blank - September 7, 2010 RE: 2012 Street Reconstruction Protects Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2012 for your neighborhood. The first step is to have an open house to familiarize you with the City's process for street reconstruction. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on Monday, September 20, 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, see attached map on the back. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics Such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special Assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in tirne for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000. To prepare for the meeting, please review the enclosed brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ". Also, for additional information on our Street Reconstruction process visit our website at http: / /www.CityOfEdina.com/ FutureProjects. Please contact Assistant City Engineer, Jack Sullivan if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend and would like more information on the process. Jack can be reached at jsLtllivan(a_)ci.edina.mnlLis or 952- 826 -0445. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer G:1 EngineeringllnfraslructurelStreetslPavement ManagemenMeighborhood Reconstruction Program12011 And 2012 Street Recon12012 Open House Letter.0oc lerH sr J U J Y O LU W 74TH ST O New Public Works �- Building W 76TH ST EDINA INDUSTRIAL 4BLVD W 70TH ST W 77TH ST City of Edina New Public Works Building a - � r , 7450 Metro Blvd W ` E Edina, MN 55439 6 An ��]l r4��, _---------- -r, Your nelgfib .N& r�~.� '' ``c,=' - `, q°= =r:cx'��_=�- .,=.� st be _v---__ ~`, ,.` ,== =^= ' -_n��_' ..,-�-' -� .-` � `- on, our -'-��r ,To,' b0ftef -Com, M, unic-cite 'the -overall: happenings oflhe. pr6joct, th16-Clity b61§1. We -topic .0 an place a c 1 If you cannot attend the open house and have questions on the process please contact either Assistant City Engineer Jack Sullivan at 952 - 826 -0445 or email at jsullivan @cl.edina.mn.us or Project Manager Jamie Cynor at 952 -826 -0440 or email jcynor @ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, *'OW'4�0� Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer cc: City Council Edina Transportation Commission /.1 September 28, 2011 City of' rCiillu RE: 2012 Richmond Hills Part( Improvements — Resident Questionnaire Dear Resident: The City of Edina has Initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2012 for your neighborhood. The first step was to hold an open house on September 13, for you to become familiar with the process. Things to know and consider: O Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost In the form of a special assessment. A typical special assessment ranges from $6,000 to $9,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and Is payable over 10 years. The estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report Is completed. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2013. • Components of a project vary and are based on questionnaire responses. The special assessment typically includes cost of new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special assessed. • Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the some year. The next step is to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The Information you share with us is essential In determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. This Information will be discussed at the project Informational meeting on October 17. The following Information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed Is attached to the back of this letter. After reading this letter completely, please complete the auestionnalre and return by October 10, In the self- addressed stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection Do you use a sump pump or have you considered Installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private properly. If a sump drain system Is Installed you could connect to It however, the line from your house to the City sump drain would be your responsibility, Including any plumbing modifications needed to connect. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, SS424.1394 www.CityofEd ina.coni 952 - 927 -0061 FAX 952.826 -0390 TTY 952.826 -0379 i 201. Richmond H)Ils Nrk linprovements Resident Questionnaire .Page A; typical sump, pump discharges onto q.'homeowner's lawn: This can cause problems with your`.lawn, your n.'eighbor's lav�in,, Your Uciserrient if your Iawn drains ,back to your home or with the street. if the sump pump constantly runs down :the gaffer line prornot)ng 'algae groW th Discharging; the sump. pu p :into the sanitary sewer, system using 'floor drains: or IaUndry tubs is:against the law, both by City Ordinance and`State Statute: If the ;topography and ,final street. designs favor a City sump drain system' we, will need' to. know if,;you currentl have asuit" - ✓" y p pump :or d fioolirig drain. Th'e. City sump. drain system.,is• funded through the `storm sewer utility fund; We also would iike to know about any local drainage' problems: `This might be an opportunity.for'the sump drainaystern to correct theseassues. '- ' 11.'Cocal brat' nage Problems, Does storm;water run -off stand.'tn'the street or,side ' Ik in front of your house ?: As partof the storm; sewer and sumpi rain design process we would like, to know If this or similar situations, are occurring in your,area `lf so please describe it in the local.drainage problems section of the questionnaire VVe wdl review °tor possible corrective action: III': Private Underground 'Utilities Sorne r`esidents.install:private underground utilities m the City owned boulevards 'also=calledf the righf-of way (ROW) These utilities are'usually lawn irrigation or pet containment systems.. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage theseutilities, If they are damaged; they will be restored only if you indicate that you.'have :these systems on your returned quesfionnaire In J46 private underground utilities section Additiondlly, if the" contractorzknov✓s`fhe location: of these private utilities; they..can dttempt to avoid damaging them during construction; IV Resid�entiai�Streetlight "s "; As,part :of all, reconstruction projects staff typically asks if residents favor upgrading their• streetlight-system. In_some, cases; the streetlight system is at the end of its e-. and: requires upgrdding We do not know. i*,.ik6 condition of your specific streetlight system, an. evaluation will be done later on Funding for streetlights are currently through sp:ectal assessrment. '7he typical °cost is approximately '$2;000 to $3;000 per REU or, per property a In the residential streetlight gption section of the questionnaire are .examples of the different styles of streetlig ,.ing, thq,: gquld„ pp. installed In your neighborhood Please rank your'siyte preferences: Please; note that ranking ;your siyle preferences ;does not mean you are In favor ofstreetlighfs: V; Ped'estrian;,l'ssues> As part of -all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks If residents see a need tq add sidewalks in the neighborhood Funding' for sidewalks Is split between special' assessment, City of Edina and the Ediria'Schoai District (if tt `e "sidewalk.falis within a school walkingzone) Th_e Typical cost to add a. couple blocks.of sidewalks:: #o a; mulfi block area,is $300 $600 per° REU,or; per property: G \PW\CENFRAI SVGS \FJ7G DiV\PROJECISVI IPR NOS \BA388 RKJvnotW H b PaA rI012) \PRELLM;DESIGNVNFO MTG \BA 3W S,way_l61160cc ­ R . 2012 lcht'hbri Hills P6* Improvements Resident Quip4tionnaire., Page '3:df;3 if youlnovo f,:aprobletn at:a pedestrian-crossing,,'m'i's*sinqs'id'e-'w6lkdr6th6r,.O*ed6st(cinl§s(:i�es, please "i e' ff us ;:about It = in of theqVestionnaire0 VI; Aiallic Manappmprt The - T'-*E6i'-na�':.'i.ra-'.'n.sp,6t,tdtidh -COffimiss-ion' typically reviews traffic Issues _ _ j ' - . on: local - streets: Wq would' like t 0�ybutr6ddWdy,h §.dhy ra ic� s sue s, PIe us aboufrif k the lrdtfil ques 't' on nc6e, Recely :Project Updatesyla'Otij Ektia If I for our !!City, Exf�, Pe�mqil notification.'sp!vItpi- you wit[ receive updates es you .. ..... they dy, preparations , suc h updates are usually ,n6tificd 16 s rig Mpqfiogs, Later, .,'If the Council chooses to prqqpp� with w n� .corucno:of "th.1 S: the a Will -W&6kly . D06ho construction the updates will __ncIbd,6. information such When.qccess-tO yppr, driveway m'Ibht:b6- limited 6r- • W-he'n"'. to, h, avo your eont'ractor your prrVdtb IdWn Irrigation s _ystem It was :damaged by construction q ji, ti YJ, 0_. The 6' ur beif form of communication With -you ., Thjs,servicb b,fr6e- dnd'6116M variety To'I r messages rom e.. 71 ihdiVIdOdIs to sign up t&r66biV.,b bei" 'oil V -'-d-ty on a . p for f:htjp:// ityeAr c: -c p:f lhe service lgq to City Extrq,.web�ifq a c a' N&bdina.., om-and' place. a bh6dk mark in" 'the box next to this nomb Richmond .Park Street ReconilrU6116fi' P aving, roub. e. signing up, for- QritV'Ekt-rd:. Questions If " ,you hd V 'LJ'OUbsti( Sincerely; qc k, D. Sullivan, P"E", Assistant .,,.y ,.r)g!n,eer this i6fibr,"Ploaso "donfia, 0 either ,.Assistant -,City:Engineer 6KN-60: anagerkrble, Enclosed: Rroperty Owner's Questionnaire, Self Add 0 r s*4§tamped Ehyelop6 ., 'EWiALiki\ DMPROJECI ...WWR NOS_\B 531. � 7 331 -301 PROJECT LIMITS 5252 5256 260 5245 5241 5400 5071 5264 5405 5404 .—Mom sa ■• wo■ •o• 5168 5108• o �o 10 5104 , `, •r� o r`Oi °j v N 24 t 5245 5249 5253 5408 5257 5204 5412 .14 I p rr �� 1� �, . ?- , RICHWID DR 48 `��p 1. 216 21' 20 0 5201 124 122 �- 128 16_- 48 5205 _ 5401 � �00 `� N °0 481 ••-'1 D] Ol 522 5217 52135209 30- 5 11 113 10si 105 r. 6405 $ IR &j 1, %n 32 -- - -, 5404 - -�— — VAUDSOR AVE ` �� 5 I ca 5130 r`i 5100 r ti 5300 M� 1 5021 5017 5056. q t oQa� 5217 ' a t� m o 5048 044 5036 O moo �• a M ip n In %5101 - -� - WIT AVE_ — -"�- '21 [ 6520 - g 5617 6618 �Z?v. � : _ I -- 228 5124 521 5624 - u 5621 6620 i 5517 41 373315029 5025 5017 21( 20 5529 _ - -1 11 _ n � i X C. 5048 503215028 5020 5w32 fS L W 66TH ST N 5213 5209 201 51095105 5600 5601 41 03750331 2fl 25 0211 017 13 095005 5603 5053 5040 5036 503115028 5024 5020 50165012 5008 5004 5604 5600 � 5608 ....._ -� -- 5605 5049` -" YVOIIIIE TER 5609 5612 5045x` 5025 21 5017 5013 5009 $005 5605 5604 � '5041 5029 - 5G13 5616 � 5037 5617 5608 5605 { /' 5016 55012 5008 5004 5G17 5610 °40 5018 - 5621 5612 5713 5721 � - 5701 5700 5701 5616 5620 5717 5020 5015 g' � � 5705 5704 5705 5712 5725 5021 5713 5624 M24 r" 5709 5708 5716 '� �� 5 +321 � 5713 5712 5724 5729 5100 5028 A 5033 5717 5716 5637 33 5625 5728 - 5032 - 562 5733 5721 5720 5030 e3 e�oosac�aeao� sae• 5125 5724 5208 5204 5200 5124 5120 H5110 -�' Project Area t� , 1} Richmond Hills Park Street Reconstruction Improvement No: QA -388 �AiguE1,2 °' • A,pu�t,sDlt September',281 2014 PROPERTY -OWNERS QU'ESTIONN IRE 2012 RICHMON -D HILLS .PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY AND `t�ibsnNt4o,�f' UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EDINA 'Please do�not an "saver theseluestions until _aftery. 6Whave: read the entire newsletter Please compiete and. return this survey by,October 10, using the;self addressed stamped_ envelope: I:, Drainage Service Connection: A. boes:your hom have a drain the %footing.drain? O Yes O:'No O:Unknown B Does your home have a sump pump ? = O'Yes p'No Mhknown C Would you be willing to connect your sump pump O Yes O No Up- to. a City drain if provided (at your own cost)_,, D 1Nould you be'Willing; to connect your roof drains O Yes O No, up to a'City drain if provided (at your own cost)? Please sketch!in. the•space to the right your house, garage, driveway; sump ;pump; discharge locafion': and approximately where, along the right of =way (ROV ' M e, you would 'like the service ;connection pipe located. .Local Drainage Problems ;please, listspeclfic;surface.water dra'age problems in your neighborhood: III.; Private Underground'.Utllltles. A.. Do you have an underground. lawn irrigation system in the Cityl's right of -way? :`(Typically the right of way is 10' to 1'5',behJnd the roadway:j; 0 Yes: 0 No B . D'o you. have an under, round.electnc pet containment sysfem,inthe City's right of way? 9 M, Yes O No' September 28, 2011 IV. Residential Streetlights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a special assessment cost of approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU)? ❑ Yes ■ Mk B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being most liked. Please answer even if you answered "No" in section IV. A. Acorn: Coach: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope from Valley View Rd to South View Ln, neighborhood, just north of Edina City Edina. Hall, Edina. Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Like 1 2 3 4 5 Arlington Lantern: Style can be viewed in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 5d" St along Wooddale Ave, Edina. Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Like 1 2 3 4 5 V. Pedestrian Issues: Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ CI ❑ Like 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 101 and W 78t" St North, Maple Grove. .y q Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Like 1 2 3 4 5 A. Do you see a need to add sidewalks in your neighborhood? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. If Yes, Where? C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? Cl Yes O No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? Thank you for your cooperation. Please return this questionnaire in the enclosed self - addressed, stamped - envelope. Please complete all questions and return to the City of Edina by October 10. - this page left intentionally blank - o I �� PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE N 2012 RICHMOND HILLS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EDINA Questionnaire Results Summary I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? 49 Yes 36 No 30 Unknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? 52 Yes 53 No 13 Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? 10 Yes 83 No D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? 9 Yes 90 No H. Local Drainage Problems— please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: Comments available upon request. III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City right -of -way boulevard and if so which company services your irrigation system? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) 36 Yes 79 No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way Boulevard? 8 Yes 106 No IV. Residential Street Lights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a direct cost of approximately $1,500 to $2,500 per REU)? 19 Yes 96 No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5 with 5 being most liked. Acorn Coach Arlington Round Number of questionnaires mailed 173 Number of returned questionnaires 116 1 Percentage returned questionnaires 67% I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? 49 Yes 36 No 30 Unknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? 52 Yes 53 No 13 Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? 10 Yes 83 No D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? 9 Yes 90 No H. Local Drainage Problems— please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: Comments available upon request. III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City right -of -way boulevard and if so which company services your irrigation system? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) 36 Yes 79 No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way Boulevard? 8 Yes 106 No IV. Residential Street Lights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a direct cost of approximately $1,500 to $2,500 per REU)? 19 Yes 96 No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5 with 5 being most liked. Acorn Coach Arlington Round 188 226 216 224 I of 2 V. Pedestrian Issues: A. Knowing that residents pay a portion of sidewalk costs in Edina, do you see a need to add new sidewalks in your neighborhood? 6 Yes 105 No B. If yes, Where? Comments available upon request. C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below (e.g. crossing adjacent busy roadways, etc.). Comments available upon request. VI. Traffic Management: A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? 26 Yes 84 No B. If yes, where is it and where does it occur? Comments available upon request. 2of2 o e & N O City of Edina November 16, 2011 RE: Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2012 for your neighborhood. As part of the public improvement process the City held an open house on September 13, 2011 to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specifically to your neighborhood. We are hosting an information meeting for the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood on November 29, 2011 at 7 :00 p.m. in the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation that will cover such things as work to be done, estimated project costs, estimated proposed assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer period. A public hearing is tentatively set for January 17, 2012. You will be notified of the exact date, time and location of the hearing. If you can not attend this open house and would like additional information please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 - 0371. City Hall 952- 927 -0861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952.826 -0390 TTY 952.82G -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 W AV.GtyofEdina.co111 - this page left intentionally blank - 21-wik NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING $EH ATTENDANCE ROSTER P= xidbeNW I ili s Pt&xe"boaiiooaRoadwv hV- - Fdma,D�T . p9%9%W%tease:: Toby D�e,PE Date of Meeftw Tm o of meetinx SEHNo.: ILW/li 7:OD PM Bft& Pow WcftP W EM-TA IUM 14AO Name Address Telephone e-mail Lam system- Corrl�nmmrt sysbm PLUMP O Yes O Yes es OW O Yes O Yes O Yes (3 No ONo 0 N O Yes O Yes D Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes 13 No 0 N 13 No 13 Yes C3 Yes OYes C3 No C) No C3 No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes Cl No 13 No (3 No O Yes D Yes O Yes D No O No O No O Yes O Yes D Yes O No O No O No Cl Yes O Yes O Yes 13 No (3 No C3 No J NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Re: R dMbPwkNd*bo&OodRoa & myImFovemms PAWI UN Rodiedummm Towmwrlm Dace of Ma PHI kg. II" raw of M*etuig 7:ao PM Lacalion of t1mag Erma Pabbr. Wad x Fad► SEH No.: ERIK& 11M 14.00 Name Address Tetepdome e-maU I am Rot Srsp ` a ms � ; . C" � Conbiamut Pups O Yes O Yes O Yes ND'NO --,36 .e. �..� •�`n es ONo O Yeas C3 O O Yes BlQo LIU % plLyes Cl No Q Yes J5 No O Yes No :�SA L .µ p _ J3 Q' J ?M,,50 1 17 W �U c �d �+ oZ ! �! O Yes No O Yes XNo WYes O No O Yes WI b O Yes G'No O Yes 346 x Lt»z,�o+•� S /t7 �L�,Q gS2-�/27 —J y ,,,�,� . cp,,,, =4et es O No O Yes O Yes may.' c1. �No �No orz• KhAb �' tC�•1s /&�tl�+kvt64-�Wu,cctv,gNo O Yes O Yes .. XNo es O No V Sas% �iJ °%j1 �6's �fY!' `/ 1p, /� cPtA + 9 � !' O Yes SLNo O Yes A No Yes Cl No M�Yes O Yes O Yes bvtwer q No Jws -i s 1 �:.,a t .►„.. `rZ - 41 zG- y�{/ �k R�r•�s� Ion . airy.,. c..p O Yes O Yes O Yes 6�`Ato .A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Rec Ric hmomd Hills pg& - -e boyhood B�dwaq anao� B&M DST P:r* Tcb9W=%PB !name of mccow mom of meeaw. Loa n of Meeffm Sm No 1 =1i 7:00 PM M=Pd tin Wadca F=ft EMN& 1I&M 14.40 Name Address Telephone eqrau lawn trrigatioo Pet Cortta Steep Ptmvs • e, { .� O �iJ�1��d ��'S�S'F .�AS�LSCSNi41G- oa Sygt= System O Yes D Yes O Yes ( Soy Z- (,()t aswz q�'2 9' �9�6 n - O•Al6 � Q f � O Yes O Yes 91yes, O No SooB �r vpso� ol�i� asi s , .gfossr+ � es O No O Yes b6b es O No O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No es O Yes Yes 1 Zya„��i4� �a�v- -•e�•• $ -�3c: �1ik� �etca�`taL+�,C�" O No O Ab J 0 O Yes aft O Yes DC* 5�A 5 OVA k2� ..a. s 14'S w s% O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No cs� a wj �r / /�6� �—' �--- es O No O Yes O No ATVs O No O Yes O Yes O Yes 15 7 f - fe 4`-476 94'�PI'r, / 7. �� �c�C� °�iGas�;a,ef O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes 1 No ANo 0 1 L, N !RAU - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Pa EMPadcNdo*o&oodRoadwV mFov==s Ems. Wq Project . TobgMumPE Tune of Meeting tar lion of MeefiW sal Noz lsr�t/t ' 7= PM SdmaP*b-. Waft FMUY WMA IIWM 14M Name Address , Telephhow j e mm _ eo# Scunp p 0 yes Js� Es cv A 5532 �a'� �Lle�� 59bp �a.�l�v- 1�,�fv�s.�•� a � Yes O Yes O Yes 1�1 Gvo �D Z0 2z ��I Wz 2bo - ,tom it t'e� Ef�i Y I. caw, '%O Nb rlo f,00 O Yes O Yes [3'iFes r'�C �Y�G Y v���� 1S'a- Y� A40 G� s�• Cd rya Orb Yes O Yes O Yes 11 of /y 55 0 !Y'Gti�CkA rZ'f�1 ` AM( C . Orb rb � � c( f �f (' 5101 W r&- %,' �J`� �j�/j �� r/ C�� • YV 1 ���/'+ �� / �/�. +Qi Kt � �ti�lrl + i No 0 No Ines O NO a Yes es O Yes O Yes 1l' tr No X14W 4M dah (.3 csJrr s n IR Yes O No O Yes rb )Q Yes O No .21 q s�2 O Yes O Yes C7 Yes �.- 4�2.gfUCe(e O No O No O Ab ,! O Yes Z140 O Yes zlio O Yes 0<0 Owe i O Yes JWYes O No O Yes 49M S'W- NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SEH ArMNDANCE ROSTER P= His Pa&WeW*a&wd P"dw;Y Bdbm mx Projed TobyMw4 PB Deft of meefinx Time of Yeetimg: Location of Meeting SEH No_ Il/29Ljj 7:00 PM Edina PdAw Waft Facay EDM 118570 1400 Now AddMSS Telephone e-mail Lawn 1 Pei; SUMP lrrigadon system ConI alntr10 - systun Ptmtps Cl Yes O Yes O Yes O No Cl No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No Cl No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No Cl No O Yes O Yes O Yes Cl No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No Cl No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes 0 No O No 0 No - this page left intentionally blank - SEH MEMORANDUM TO: City of Edina FROM: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) DATE: December 6, 2011 RE: Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements — List of Questions asked by Residents at the November 29, 2011 Informational Meeting SEH No. EDINA 118570 1. What is the width of the boulevard and what is the typical project limits? The right -of -way is 60 feet wide and the roadway, including curb, is approximately 30 feet wide. This leaves approximately 15-feet behind the curb to the right -of way. The project typically disturbs 5-8-feet behind the proposed curb. 2. What if we don't want to have our sanitary sewer service done at this time? If a resident chose to wait until after the project was completed, the cost of restoring the roadway and boulevard as part of reconstructing your sanitary sewer service would be much higher than completing the work now. 3. What is the purpose of adding new trunk water main pipe on Richmond Lane and Kent Avenue? When the entire neighborhood's trunk water main system is analyzed as a whole, the addition of the pipes along Richmond Lane and Kent Avenue essentially 'loop' the water system together that causes an increase the fire flow capacity to more desirable levels. 4. Why is there storm sewer pipe proposed up to Richmond Circle? The property owner questionnaire noted several drainage issues with this intersection. 5. Why is our neighborhood being reconstructed? The City prioritizes neighborhood streets and utilities for reconstruction based on need and in conjunction with the five year Capital Improvement Plan approved by the council. 6. Why are the preliminary assessments doubled from what was noted in the open house invitation letter? The letters sent were formed letters used for all of the City projects being introduced. The estimates quoted were not detailed estimates for the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood. A. detailed estimate is typically only available at the project specific informational meetings. 7. Why can't the overhead.private utilities be buried? The private utility companies typically assess the work to bury overhead lines and the costs are very high. 8. What is there an advantage of having a private contractor do the sanitary sewer service reconstruction work? The City's contractor will only reconstruct your sanitary sewer service from the trunk pipe in the street to the right -of -way and typically a private contractor can reconstruct your entire sanitary sewer service from the trunk pipe in the street to your house for the same cost or a little more than the City's contractor. You are getting a_ better cost per lineal foot. 9. What if I have a tree over my sanitary sewer service pipe? The City's contractor would be required to use a trenchless method of reconstruction of your sanitary sewer service. 10. How big is the proposed concrete apron? The City standard apron measures 3 feet from the back of curb towards your property and matches the width of the existing driveway. . 11. What is the construction process identified for the sanitary sewer service reconstruction? The proposed method of reconstruction for the sanitary sewer services is open trench method unless there are existing obstacles such as trees or landscaping. 12. What happens to the landscaping and/or walls in the right -of -way? City policy says that landscaping boulders and structures in the boulevard are not acceptable. If it affects roadway safety and specifically snowplowing operations, it will likely be removed, otherwise the project team will work with affected property owners on these issues. 13. What is the reason to change the intersections at Windsor Avenue /Kent Avenue and Kent Avenue/ Warwick, Place? When possible, the City reduces pavement areas in intersections for safety and maintenance purposes and to match typical intersections installed throughout the City. p:\ae\e\edma \l 1373415f naNeasibility repon\appendix\neighb mig res quations.do - Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9301 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 651.490.2150 fax - this page left intentionally blank - SEH City of Edina . Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Open House Plumbers Questionnaire Summary November 29, 2011 Revisions: 2128/08 Updated Information based an 2/15/08 Meeting w/ Plumbers. 12/30/10 Updated Plumber Information. 0126/11 Updated Plumber Information. 02/2111 Updated Plumber Information. DISCLAIMER: The City of Edina does not endorse any contractor listed on this list'The list is being provided to you only as a beginning reference In your search for a contractor. This list was created in 2005 and revised Feb. 2008, Dec. 2010, Jan. 2011 and Feb. 2011. - . Trenchless Methods for Sa tary Sewer Se lee Pipe Reconstruction Trenchless Methods for Water Service Pipe Reconstruction Contact Information .. Contractor Private Service Pipe Reconstruction - Services' Slip Line Method Cured in Place ,Pipe Method Pipe Bursting Method ' Other Trenchless Methods Directional° Drilling Method Other Trenchless Methods Contact Name. ' Day Phone . Email Address Aqua City Plumbing Yes No Yes No No NUMA Gopher Dave Vogelgesang:,, 612.827.2871 Co in Plumbinci Yes No No No Yes Lance Co in.. 9524722316 Ellingson Companies Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Todd Hoffman 888.527.2294 507.251.4372 thoffman(Mellingsondreinage.com Benjamin Franklin Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional Drilling and Pilot Tube Pullback Yes Tunneling w/ Pneumatic Gopher. With pipe bursting equipment can pull water service at same time. Paul Gavic 763.755.6468 pgavicftgmail.com Gene's Water & Sewer Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Drop hole - tunnel Yes Drop hole - tunnel Craio Peterson 612.781.3737 www.geneswateraridse"r.com H' hview Plumbing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Drop hole - tunnel Yes . Drop hole - tunnel Dan Swanson 952.933.8600-. hi hn aol.com Inter City Water & Sewer Yes No No No Yes Gary Skjod 763.498.7292 'uliesk'od oomcest.net Jeche Excavating Yes Yes No No No No Gopher, Tunnel, Directional Bore Bob Jeche 612.720.7456 Metro General Services Yes No No Yes Directional Drillinri Yes Tunnel Dale Cazett 763.428.2938 metr enerai hotmail.com Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water Yes Yes Yes No Yes - Directional Drilling and Pilot Tube Pullback Yes Handtunneling, underground piercino tool (Gopher Kevin Hoyhtya 612.861.6076 khoyt@aol.com, MSSWINC@aol.com Mr Rooter Plumbing Yes Yes Yes'" Yes Yes - Directional Drilling and Pilot Tube Pullback Hor¢ontal Directional Boring John Wilder 763.551.0555 iugal.agarwal(Mgmail.com Nova Frost, Inc. Yes Yes No Yes Yes = Directional Drilling Yes Tunneling Michael Frost 651.480.8575 novafrost(Wearthlinknet Olson Construction Yes No No Yes - Directional Drilling and Pilot Tube Pullback Ron Olson - 952.448.6674 Ouverson Sewer & Water Yes Yes Yes No Yes - Directional Drilli NUMA Gopher Troy Ouverson 612.751:6888 fro linem ewer com Parrott Contracting, Inc. Yes Yes No No Yes - Directional Drilling and Pilot Tube Pullback rYes Directional Boring Dave Parrott 507.248.9697 dpamott(�fromiemet.net Richfield Plumb' Co. Yes Yes. No No " Yes - Directional Drilling_ Pneumatic Go her Bob Adelman 612.919.1381. service richfueld Iambi .tam Roto Rooter Services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional Drilling With pipe burstin g equipment can pull water service at same time. Blaine Weiss, 763.519.3928 David.skanet(rDrse.com Sunset Construction Inc. Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional drilling, pd launched red pusher, vacuum boring Yes Pd launched directional drilling, pd launched red pusher, vacuum boring Bob Froverp 612.701.9739 or 763.479.1044 Thompson Plumbing Yes No No No Yes - Directional Drilling No Directional Boring Keith Gauss, 952.933.7717, keithathompsonplumbing.net 3B's Sewer & Drain Service Yes No Yes No No None Bart Carlson 320.587.0900 bart3bohotmai7.com Underground Utilities, Inc. Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Jason Johnson 612.860.0401 iohnson@uuimn.eom Valle Rich Co. Inc. Yes Yes Yes Yes Directional Drilling Yes Pneumatic Gopher John Mikl a 952448.3002 'ohm valle - rich.00m Westonka Mechanical Yes Yes Yes Yes The yes answers above are done by us and No Brian Clark 612.741.9779 Dasen Contracting Yes No No No Yes Gordy Larsen or Todd Larsen 952.461 -2100 daseocomrecnna0yahoo.com Valley-Rich Co. Inc Yes 1, Yes Yes 1 Yes Pneumatic Gopher Yes Pneumatic Go her John Mika - 95248 3002 ohm a cn co Pi eri ht Plumbin Yes No Yes No No No Chuck Kea 612- 789 -6126 cnarleskes aol cdm WiidmerConst. I Yes I No- I Yes I No No No lTonyVanderlinde - 952- 9555062 Ivand erBne frontle etnet - this page left intentionally blank - -A e SEH City of Edina Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Improvement No. BA-388 Preliminary Assessment Roll 11129/2011 Revisions: 12/20/11 Update names P:\AE\E\Edina \718570\4- prelim- dgn- rprtsWssessment\[Pend Assess RoUdsx]Sheetl PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right -of -Way Line Estimated Total Assessment Rate 3311721210004 James & Kathleen Lane 5004 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240030 Matthew A & Alissa L Movern 5005 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210005 Jill Emanuel 5008 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240031 Darwin F & Margaret M Dahl, III 5009 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210006 James & Patricia Klobe 5012 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240032 Judith M HaWey 5013 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210007 Michael S & Suzanne V Robb 5016 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240033 Ronald E & Susan Pray 5017 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210008 Nancy J Litwin 5020 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240034 Theodora & Leonard En man 5021 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240035 Thomas J Wurst 5025 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210009 Thomas John Wurst 5028 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240036 William & Dorenne R Just, Jr 5029 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210010 Christopher J & Kristin L Mo uist 5032 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240037 Lori A Sandvig 5033 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00. 3311721210011 Peter S & Tiffany G Bils 5036 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240038 Chris & Dawn Rofidal 5037 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210012 Gary L & Lisa A Wi nes 5040 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240039 Genevieve M Grove 5041 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210033 Mary T Dunphy 5044 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210013 Herbert Royce 5048 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210026 David R & Anne S Braun 5104 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240042 Gregory H & Susan M Keane 5105 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210027 Scott L Thorp 5108 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240043 Thomas A & Judith E Forker 5109 56TH ST W $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210030 Neva B Waters 5517 CODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.001 $16,800.00 Page 1 of 5 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right -of -Way Line Estimated Total Assessment Rate 3311721220042 David C & Lori A Kunz 5520 CODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210029 Scott R Strand & Katherine Thomson 5521 ICODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220043 Gerald Pe lin 5524 CODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210028 Keith Curtin 5525 CODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220044 Mark A & Lisa E Cox 5528 CODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220002 James A Ankeny & Lucinda A Winter 5532 CODE AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210079 Mark L Van Sloun 5004 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210080 Ann M Hanson Mary Elena & Doris M Martin/ Life Estate 5008 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210022 Sumner Adam & Jennifer I Musolf 5009 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210081 Jeffrey J Johnson 5012 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210021 James M & E Jean Smith 5013 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210082 Damodara Annareddy & Ruth S Potta 5016 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210020 Donald L & Suzanne L Reading 5017 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210083 Sam K & Stephanie M Porter 5020 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210084 William & Shawn Buss 5024 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210019 Patrick J & Margaret B Huber 5025 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210085 Stanley & Katherine Wasley 5028 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210018 Anthony Schroe fer 5029 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210086 Norman D & Debra A Mead 5032 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210017 Gerard & Elizabeth Shannon 5033 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210087 Teric M & Katherine A Steines 5036 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210016 Harold & Mary A Schwind 5037 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210015 Mary L Throndrud 5041 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210088 Erik & Joanna Engstrom 5044 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210089 Beniamin S Fife 5048 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16 800.00 3311721210090 Justin Malser & Elizabeth Cutshall 5056 KENT AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240048 Grant & Susan Johnson 5004 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240050 William J & Patricia Hanson 5008 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240028 Jordan M Mauer 5009 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240051 Dale R & Marci A Lore 5012 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240052 Jeffrey S Skoog & Annick H L Pellefter-Skooq 5016 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240053 Don Henderson 5018 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240027 James M Ostlund 5020 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240026 Paul A & Diane S Schroeder 5024 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240029 Anne L Olstad 5025 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240025 Gary L Domann & Brian P Ellingson 5028 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240022 Don E & Virginia L Washburn 5029 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240024 Patricia H Brodsky 5032 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240021 Morgan S & Susan M Brown 5033 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240023 Daniel J & Joanne F Kersten 5036 NORMANDALE CT $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210041 Almon G Hoe 5100 RICHMOND CIR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210040 Willard & Grace Raymond 5104 RICHMOND CIR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210039 1 Kermit F Johnson 5108 RICHMOND CIR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 Page 2 of 5 PID Taxpayers Name Street #• Street Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right -of -Way Line - -. Estimated Total Assessment Rate 3311721210038 Jerome.H Schlink- 5112 RICHMOND CIR $13,400.00 43;400.00' $16,80000 3311721210037 Sreeran•ini R.Seetharam & Ach uth V I en ar - - 5116 RICHMOND CIR $13 400:00, .... $3,400.00 : $16,8001. 3311721210001 Susan C R Khatri - 5005 RICHMOND DR $131400:00 $3;400.00;. $16,800.00. 3311721210053 Loretta G Knab 5008 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400:00, .. $16,800.00"- 3311721210002 Glad s.M Morgan - 5011 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3 400.00' $16 800.00_- 3311721210052 Christo her -W & Kathryn F Jones 5012 RICHMOND DR $13,400:00 $3,40U0 $16,800 :00 3311721210051 Nathaniel S & Chelsea A -Dick 5016 RICHMOND DR $13;400.00 $3;400.00. $16,800.00 3311721210061- Keith'B Thompson &Renata M Vi•ums - 5017 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00' $3,400:00. $16,800.00 3311721210050 Dou las Erickson 5020 RICHMOND -DR $13,400.00- $3;400.00. _ -, $16,800.00 3311721210060 Frank W &-Rennetta A Barr. -. 5021 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 3,400.001 $16,800.00 3311721210049 John W & Beverly H Haw ll 5024 RICHMOND DR - $13,400:00: $3,400.00r :: $16,800.00 3311721210059 Dou las G & Andrea L Doebbert .5025 RICHMOND -DR $13;400.00 $3,400:00:7 ..$16,800.00 3311721210048 Colin J &Abi ail K Rooney 5028 RICHMOND DR, $13,400.00 .$3,400.00 . <.:._$16;800.00 3311721210058 Matthew M & Emily D Knodt 5029 RICHMOND-DR $13,400.00 $3,400 :00' ... $16,800.00 3311721210047 Jaconda Hawkins &C/0, Mary Moncur. 5032 RICHMOND DR $13;400.00 $3,400:00 . -_ $16,800.00 3311721210057 Yuriy Malinin ;5033 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210046_ Engels 5036 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 _ _$3,400:00 $16,800.00 3311721210056 Charles Spear . 5037 RICHMOND DR $3,400.00' $16,800.00 3311721210045 Christopher M Johnson 5040 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00. $3,400:00 $16800.00 3311721210055 John P &.Lucille.F Schneiderrrrust 5041 RICHMOND -DR $13,400.00. -$3,400.00 $16,800:00 3311721210044. John Hatch 5044 RICHMOND DR $13,400:00 $3,400.00 _ $16,800.00 3311721210043 Terrence G& Karen -Ann Roach . 5048 RICHMOND;DR- $13;400.00 $3,400.00 $161800.00: 3311721210042 Timoth `'J & Sarah K Sullivan 5052 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00•. $16,800:00 3311721210073 Thomas D &Rochelle F Crowley 5105 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 .,,$16,800.00 331 - 1721210072 Richard.Rooney 5109 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16800.00 3311721210071 Martha H & Larry J Dover 5113 RICHMOND DR $13;400.00 .$3,400.00 $16 800.00 3311721210115' Steven J Stroncek & Pamela E Erickson 5117 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00. $16;800.00 3311721210036 Eric E;& Meredith K Wold 5120 RICHMONDDR $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210035 John W & Karin Marshall 5124 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3 400:00 $16,800.00 3311721210034 Thomas W Lasalle 5128 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00- $16,800.00 331:1721220007 June B Re an 5132 RICHMOND DR $13,400.00 $3,400.00,.: $161800.00 331;1721210074 Richard -D Stresnak - 5400 RICHMOND LA $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00. 3311721210054 Gre o A Bassett 5401 RICHMOND LA $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210075 Carrie E.Wikman •5404 RICHMOND LA $13,400:00- $3,400:00 $16,800.00 331172121.0069 Leah Rae.Schibur 5405 RICHMOND LA - $13,400:00 $3`400 :00. $16,800,00 3311 721 21 0023 George Frey,-Jr 5516 WARWICK PL $13,400.00• $3,40U0 : $16 800:00 3311721210014- Michael A Ennis & Linda L Tate :5517 WARWICK PL $13,400.00 • $3,400.00.. $16;800.00 3311721210024 Verne S Goodmanson.. 5520 WARWICK PL $13,400.00 $3,400:00 $16,800.00. 3311721210025,-, Nathan &Gretchen Gru s 5524 WARWICK PL • $13,400.00 $3;400.00. $16,800.00 331,1721240041 Carol L °Bros. 5600 WARWICK PL $13,400.00 $3;400:00 $16,800.00 3311721240040 Jerril A,& Mary J.Palmer 5601 WARWICK PL $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210101 Michael W &'Janis A Kimmel 5005 WINDSOR AVE $13;400:00 $3,400 :00 $16;800.00 3311721210031 IMarc E &:Mar aret Grossman. 5008 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 331.1721210100 1 Neil A Murphy & Brid et M Stevens-MUrphy. I 5009 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00. $16,800.00 Page 3 of 5 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right -of -Way Line Estimated Total Assessment Rate 3311721210032 Robert J & Sharon A Hartung 5012 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210062 Richard D & Lorelei S Becker 5016 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3 400.00 1 $16,800.00_ 3311721210099 Todd F & Sydney S Taggart 5017 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210063 Ray E Nelson & Sally A Dunn 5020 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210098 David & Alison Auerbach 5021 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210064 Jacques A & Kellianne B Williamson 5024 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210065 Linda Moen 5028 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210097 Lorie Mahoney 5029 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210066 Matthew E W & Dina K Scholl 5032 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210096 Michael R & Janice K Bolin 5033 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210067 Janice Joshua 5036 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210095 Christopher Lee & Judith A G Thommes 5037 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210068 Gordon A Brown, Jr 5040 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210094 Richard J & Madonna B Loeffler Trustee 5041 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210093 John Basill 5045 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3 400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210092 Robert D & Suzanne K Carman 5049 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210091 John D Shively 5053 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210102 Steven L & Susan B Meyer 5100 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210107 Lambert Meidin er, Jr 5101 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210108 David C & Susan L Arenson 5103 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210103 William S Steinke 5104 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210109 Caral Heffernan 5105 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210104 Florence A O sahl & Cecilia Cofield 5108 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210110 Saharla A Jama 5109 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210105 Todd W & Mary Peterson 5112 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210111 Richard J & Maggie A Mccracken 5113 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210112 Eve S Schnell Clarke 5117 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721210114 Todd B & Jody S Nelson 5120 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220063 Kim Kuffel 5200 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220058 Peter J & Laura S Hoffman 5201 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220064 Duane N Hall & Patricia Korth 5204 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220059 Jason R & Breann A Robinson 5205 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220065 James T & Victoria A Seveland 5208 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220060 Radoslav Atanasoski 5209 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220061 Michael J & Sheryl A Bertrand 5213 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721220062 Pauline T Sateren 5217 WINDSOR AVE $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240080 Richard D Borland & Lynda L Lorenz 5004 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240076 Dorothy M Krueger 5005 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240056 Kurt K Knutson & Clara Case 5008 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240075 Thomas Divine 5009 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240057 Kathleen Galarneau 5012 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240074 1 Raymond J Kenning, Mary E Kenning & Pi er K Webb 5013 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240058 1 Paul A & Paula L Joy I 5016 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240073 1 Dianne S Blake & Thomas Tessman I 5017 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 1 $16,800.00 Page 4 of 5 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Street.. Reconstruction ,Sanitary SewerService Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right -of -Way Line - Estimated Total. Assessment Rate 3311721240059 Ran Ballin er: &An ie McConnell 5020 YVONNE TER $13;400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240072 David & Ann K F Dickey, 5021 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240060 Mark DA Mary Ann Grovak. 5024 YVONNE TER - $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240071 Robert Fitzsimmons Jr 5025 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00. $16,800.00 3311721240061 Matthew & Amy C Olson 5028 YVONNE TER $13,400:00. $3,400.00. $16,800:00 3311721240070 _ Andrew E & Laura R Giertsen 5029 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240062 Kurt M & Nancy O Dalsin 5032 YVONNE TER $13,400:00 $3,400.00 $16,800. 00 3311721240063 Kraig D Knutson Bridget Towe 5036 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 - $16,80000 3311721240078 Janice B Ber ren 5037 YVONNE.TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 $16,800.00 3311721240064 Jeffre T & Barbara A Meyer 5040 YVONNE TER $13,400.00 $3,400.00 _. $16,800.00 331. 1721240079. Susan- WI(eator 5041 YVONNE TER $13,400:00'" $3,400.00.. $16800.00 3311721240067' Phili AA Dorinda K Johnson 5045 YVONNE TER $13400.00.: ..$3,400.00 $16;800.00 3311721240066 IJames D & Nancy L Jaeckels I 5049 YVONNE TER $13;400.00 $3,400.00 - $16,800.00 3311721240065' Warren:D & Joann GSn der I 5053 YVONNE TER' $13,400.00 -$3,400:00 $16 800.00 Page 5 of 5 r - this page left intentionally blank - 2 -I-ew, VI . B. Sharon Allison From: Wayne Houle Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:53 AM To: Sharon Allison Subject: FW: Richmond Hills Park Project Sharon: Please make a copy for the City Council meeting tonight. Thanks Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works @ cia 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 WHouleOc!.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Tim Sullivan [mailto:mplsullyca)msn.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 10:21 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: tmuse(a)sehinc.com Subject: Richmond Hills Park Project Wello, My family is affected by the proposed Richmond Hills roadway project proposed for summer of 2012. We have lived at 5052 Richmond Hills since April of 2004. I find this increase in proposed assessments unacceptable. In this current market and economy we can not endure an assessment that is roughly 5 times our current property tax and 5 -10% of home values. Help us understand how a project that does not propose sidewalks, streetlights or pavers; a project that does not assess for water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer as your September 28, 2011 letter states, can evolve into one of the more expensive assessments in Edina? Please look at other options for street improvement which can lower the costs substantially or delay this project until we have a more robust real estate market to counter these additional hits to our real estate values. The timing is just not right for residents to digest another substantial burden on our properties. Tim Sullivan 5052 Richmond Drive Edina, MN 55436 952 - 948 -0873 mplsullyCabmsn.com 4�SN�A.,r'L o .ay Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Date: December 28, 2011 City of Edina To: Property Owners of Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Edina, Minnesota From: City of Edina and Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.(SEH) Reference: Explanation of Conflicting Estimated Special Assessment Rate Amounts Improvement No. BA -388 Due to questions stemming from the Neighborhood Informational Meeting on November 29, 2011 regarding special assessment amounts, we thought this would be a good time to explain why you have been seeing varying levels of special assessment amounts in previous correspondence to you. On September 7, 2010 the City sent you a letter inviting you to a neighborhood open house. This invitation letter stated that "The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000." At that open house the City introduced you its roadway reconstruction process. On August 30, 2011 the City sent you another letter inviting you to a second neighborhood open house. This invitation letter stated that "The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $6,000 to $9,000." At the second open house, which was a repeat of the 2010 open house, the City reminded you about its roadway reconstruction process. Both of these invitation letters were form letters used by the City to invite property owners living in all of the City's upcoming project areas to learn about the City's street reconstruction process. The estimated assessment amounts quoted in these 2 letters were not detailed estimates for the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood (Richmond Hills) project. Instead they were representative amounts from a cross - section of recently completed City roadway reconstruction projects. We report representative amounts from a cross - section of recently completed projects because we are.inviting property owners living in all of the City's upcoming project areas. Some of the Cities upcoming projects are of course less and more complex 1 expensive than a representative project. We included the representative amounts in the invitation letters to educate property owners that the City uses special assessments to pay for part of the project's cost. In the event the project moves forward, the City encourages property owners to begin planning financially for the assessment as soon as they can. Additionally, the representative amounts quoted in the invitation letters attract more curious property owners to the neighborhood open houses. The more property owners attending an open house the greater the benefit to the potential project. City Hall 952.927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 Explanation of Conflicting Estimated Special Assessment Rate Amounts December 28, 2011 Page 2 As we mentioned at the 2 open houses, the City's process includes preparing a feasibility study specifically for each upcoming City street reconstruction project. Enough of the study for Richmond Hills was complete at the Neighborhood Informational Meeting on November 29, 2011 to provide Richmond Hills' property owners with a more accurate estimated assessment amount of $16,800. This amount consists of an estimated $13,400 for the roadway portion and $3,400 for the portion of the sanitary sewer service pipe that is in the right -of -way. We understood the frustration expressed by Richmond Hills' property owners at the Neighborhood Information Meeting that $16,800 is more than the $6,000 to $9,000 stated in the second invitation letter. The Richmond Hills project contains a total upgrade of the water and sanitary sewer system. A more representative project to the Richmond Hills project is the 2011 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood project. In Minnehaha Woods, the City also completely upgraded the water and sanitary sewer system. Minnehaha Woods has a pending assessment of $16,300 ($11,800 for the roadway portion and $4,500 for the portion of the sanitary sewer service pipe that is in the right -of- way). Hindsight is always much better — so in the future the City will not include representative amounts from a cross - section of recently completed projects in its invitation letters to neighborhood open houses. The City Council will consider accepting the Richmond Hills feasibility study and ordering the preparation of bidding documents at the public improvement hearing on January 17 at 7:00 p.m. at Edina City Hall. Enclosed with this letter is the official notice informing you of the public improvement hearing. If you would like to view other documents before the hearing, please visit the City's web page for the Richmond Hills project at the following link: http: //www.ci.edina.mn.us / Departments/ L5_ ConstructionProjects _RichmondHills_BA388.htm To better communicate the overall happenings of the project, the City has introduced the City Extra e- mail notification service. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /cityextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to your neighborhood project name (Richmond Hills Park). Please contact the City at 952.927.8861 if you are having trouble signing up for the City Extra. We look forward to seeing you at the Public Improvement Hearing on January 17. Please contact either of us with questions or comments. Wayne D. Houle, PE Toby Muse, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Project Manager City of Edina SEH Inc. 952.826.0443 952.912.2616 whoule(cD-ci.edina.mn.us tmuse a.sehinc.com 11� City of Edina December 28, 2011 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -388 RICHMOND HILLS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2012 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2013. The estimated project cost is $2,873,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessments. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $16,800 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed improvements includes all properties between and including: 5004 to 5036 Normandale Court; 5004 to 5053 Yvonne Terrace; 5004 to 5109 56th St W; 5516 to 5601 Warwick Place; 5004 to 5056 Kent Avenue; 5005 to 5217 Windsor Avenue; 5517 to 5532 Code Avenue; 5400 to 5405 Richmond Lane; 5005 to 5132 Richmond Drive; 5100 to 5116 Richmond Circle Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952- 826 -0379 a MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING PUBLIC WORKS MULTIPURPOSE ROOM JANUARY 9, 2011 6:00 p.m. City Council asked ETC to call a special meeting to advise the ROLL CALL: Answering roll call were members Bass, COMMUNITY COMMENTS — None REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS REVISED FEASABILITY REVIEW Richmond Hills Park Assistant City Engineer; 'Sullivar>; Mr. Sullivan started g�yiCg an,l • This neighbgrhood has s Roadway will ��m�ai in ak • Selected utility replpem From'ieefng on December drainage�ocerns. General`s or on any otoe� roadway withi Discussion a f of tKq rb and same Of Public Hearing on January 17, 2012. novy, the and Schold Davis. Itant for the project. curb and gutter will be installed. , sanitary sewer and some storm sewer to ns will be redesigned to more traditional "T" iht- of -way. lion included radius at these locations, bus operations, and ETC at that time was not to include sidewalk on 56th Street January 9, 2012: • This area is o side t s pool walking zone and is an "all bus route" to Countryside Elementary. There is a pave a way�along Normandale from Benton Avenue to Eden Avenue. • Mr. Sullivan was askewhat is looked at when evaluating a project for pedestrian improvements. Is it the sidewalk figure in the comprehensive plan and the potential to add sidewalks, or are there other improvements also considered, such as marking crosswalks, improving drainage (to reduce ponding on street), evaluating sight lines. For bike lanes, Mr. Sullivan was asked whether they look at the storm grates and longitudinal joints for example. Mr. Sullivan indicated they do replace storm grates, address ponding, and consider the longitudinal joints. Mr. Sullivan was encouraged to communicate to the Council and public the level of detail that is thought through with regard to pedestrian and bicycling improvements. \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Minutes \2012 Minutes \MINUTES for January 9, 2012—Special Meeting.docx • Mr. Sullivan was asked whether street lighting is evaluated and whether current lighting is sufficient, for example for pedestrians. Mr. Sullivan stated that most are traditional lighting at intersections to delineate the intersection. • Mr. Muse indicated questionnaires have been sent out to residents. He indicated six residents stated the need for sidewalks and even fewer preferred changing street lights. • Members noted the project cost increased fr residents. Mr. Sullivan indicated that the orig that need more extensive restoration are not that the increase is partially due to repair t infiltration. • Mr. Muse addressed the issue of school buses be a little overlap of the bus into the oncoming town. Cars have a tighter turning radius so will • Mr. Muse commented that residents have revi there was minimal comment regarding the redi and Kent and the Windsor and Kent inte ec boulevard space, driveways and irrigatio sys�e snow removal will not be affected. Str et lig intersections. • The ETC commented on the need for a sidewal • Members discussed the exit in --sidewalk al Eden Avenue down to Benton a tRie termi streets of the project. Mr. Sullivtn at Natt s suggesting enhancing the cross Ik to visualF. • Members asked what the procet' is for addr addressed thr9u§fi new project (i.e addition should be id tifre to, duress these or�cern • Mr. Sulliva6w�s ked \ helther residents \afe them. Theree\a� some dis us�ion abou\row i of the survey. Hoy l �oes th Ity balance hei poli_y direction, ss , ,c s l i ing Streets. The n <ETC--�Inot: egaramg'a si aewai �edo nmmen nsensus wa to not ehave. \ Rend lion The Edina Tra spartation Com report. ETC doesn't have plan. Countryside Neighborhood argue om the cost stated in the original communication to final letter was a generic amount and neighborhoods accounted for in original letter. Mr. Muse mentioned o sanitary seryic,,e lines, which have extensive root redesigned intersections. There will this is typical of buses in any area of ; dd -the chdngge "t the informational meeting and Ict�n in pavement at \he intersections with Warwick O s. Mr. Sullivan�tated that with the increase in ms will be extended accldingly. Snow plowing and Iing will be changed accordingly to illuminate the ono \N�ofmandale Frontage Road,-that extends from nates���t E��st View Lane. This trail crosses seven ince these s`E�eets have low level of traffic staff is not y�continue.ppOway. essing traffics%eanqgement concerns that will not be stogy signs, peoing on Richmond). A process brmed That W ether a sidewalk is installed is up to sidents could get that impression from the wording responsive to resident preferences with an overall ,d for a pedestrian plan was noted. , "Where should our priorities be ?" Although the ii hborhood, it is not opposed to a sidewalk, The Iks in this neighborhood based on the information is recommending the improvements as indicated in the feasibility particular project but it is triggering discussion regarding a pedestrian Mr. Sullivan started by giving an overview of the Feasibility Report and the discussions held at the November 17, 2011 ETC meeting. • The neighborhood will have all new curb and gutter • New water services and other selective utility rehabilitations • Realignment of four intersections along Crescent Drive \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Minutes \2012 Minutes \MINUTES for January 9, 2012_Special Meeting.docx • The ETC recommended the addition of sidewalk along Westridge Boulevard and Hillside Road. Discussion among ETC members on January 9, 2012: • Recognize that putting sidewalks throughout is expensive. Since there are kids walking to school and nearby parks, the ETC thought it was a reasonable compromise to increase the walk - ability and look at the most natural pathway through the neighborhood to the school and park. The most logical path would be Westridge Boulevard and Hillside Road to access Countryside Park and Countryside Elementary School. • Mr. Sullivan stated that if the sidewalk was added, the ai accommodate the addition of a 5' boulevard and 5' wal . A I heat from street and sidewalk and tends to dry tho�� tightened up. • Mr. Sullivan stated that very preliminary estimat ha a the si An assessment amount of S6AA --;I AA -eerie e_ fter adds school -25 %, residents -50% and the City-256/6' this in the project area. The residents are not awa�of� • In all projects sidewalks and drainage should be. routes. If Council sees this as the ", olicy, then it is project. For future projects, letters andiestionnair residents that Edina has a walk - ability o I a, safe • Reiterated that there is Countrysi � ar , r dE. Recognize we developing a Living Stl et�polic -,,,b throughout the City ?�l-dee the best 'places City Where does the re d ts�np�lt�ome m w er�rr • With limited do rs to be speq,t, would the etefmii Mr. Sullivan ind' te� we have a need th n fu c to work within. 7\ • Recommendation from prior eetiWwas if sidewa cross a�ri 1ks. Discussion'apoiat where - crosswalks shr • Sould'fesibility study begone for the dristalyd. evaluatiho drlveways: eiistina i could be shifted slightly to better than 5' boulevard creates too much Intersections on Crescent will be approximately $140,000. c is 1700. The cb$t Would be split between the additional assessment\Yw6uld include all residents ie ETC's ecommendatioritd\,add sidewalks. onsider'ed t create pedest iah and bicycle safe easnab that they are bein�,c�nsidered for any to resi , ents should address this policy to educate irk, \ and school near to the project area. dow� �i eplement it, what are the priorities rid th%e \Ico � at when reconstructing area? ation for prior ty sidewalks be opportunity driven? ng sources; gut also have time -lines that we have end at Tracy do we need to look at additional be placed. Im staff perspective, felt the sidewalk could be sidewalk on most appropriate side. The ETC reitergted\ support for �idbwalks a's /shown on page 9 of 12 of the feasibility report. Their recommendation is , ased on this ar a��eing in a school zone, near a City park, consistent with Living Streets principles and would aloe a good c nn ction for any future sidewalk along Valley View Road. The ETC will create an A vls Co munlcatlon to forward to Council as part of the public hearing. hair 9 Janovy will complete and Me ber, elson will review. Bass moved to create an Advisory Communication for the Countryside project, seconded by Schol Davis, the motion passed. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Minutes \2012 Minutes \MINUTES for January 9, 2012—Special Meeting.docx f, ffovte 'o I'. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -17 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -17 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -17 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real City of Edina or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Braemar Golf Course Memorial Fund For Future Golf Course Equipment Purchases: John Adams $25.00 Douglas Polich $50.00 Richard Leonard $50.00 Jerald Sitek $25.00 Mark Gaasedelen $25.00 John Valliere $15.00 Anton Melin $25.00 Michael Welbaum $40.00 Edina Fire Department: Thurl Quigley $50.00 Edina Park Department: Edina Community Foundation $950.00 Browndale Park Improvements Dated: January 17, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 day of www.CityofEdina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 o le 1&)1�1 , - R EQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF �� o $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER :� To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. VIII. B From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Award of Bid - Contract No. PW 12 -1 Water Meter Replacement Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: January 10, 2012 March 10, 2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid , 2. Ferguson Waterworks $ 3,617,504.29 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ferguson Waterworks $ 3,617,504.29 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is to replace all of the water meters within the City. During the mid- 1990's the City upgraded the water meters to a radio read system; meaning that the water meters are read via a vehicle traveling down a roadway. The batteries that energize the radios are failing at an alarming rate. This project is part of the current Capital Improvement Plan; the anticipated project was to replace the majority of the batteries and not the entire meters. During the design of the bid documents, staff discovered two issues that wouldn't support just replacing the batteries. The first issue is the band width that the FCC has appropriated for'the original radios will not be available for public use starting on January 1, 2013; staff is applying for an extension. The second issue is that most current meters contain a very small amount of lead in the meter body. Beginning in 2014, any meter containing lead will not be allowed to be installed. Given these issues, staff designed the project to include a total replacement of the meters to be completed by June of 2013. Two bids were received for this project. The bid from Dakota Supply Group did not meet specifications; therefore staff is recommending that this bid be rejected. The Capital Improvement Plan budgeted $1,200,000 for this project. Due to the pressing need for these meters and we believe the bids are competitive, staff is recommending that Treatment Plant No. 5 not begin until 2014 -2015. This will re- appropriate funds within the water fund to implement the meter replacements. Staff recommends awarding this bid to Ferguson Waterworks. 110 Public Works Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget- John Wallin, Finance Director City G: \PW \INFRAS \UTILITIES DIV\WATER \Water meters\Item VIII. B. Award of Bid Contr PW 12 -1 Water Meter Replacement.docx 0 e H�v �y REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: JANUARY 17, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Susan Howl n"ECENEC� -1 -_ From: Susan Khatri [ mailto :dragontales3lC&hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 13,2012 1:50 PM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ To: mbrindleO)comcast.net Cc: Scott Neal; Emilie Kastner Subject: RE: follow up proposed Richmond Hills Park street project Hi Mary, Thanks for your note. Thank you very much. I appreciate creative ideas about these sorts of dilemmas that cities and residents face. In 2010 this project was street reconstruction and the price was 8K -12K, and the only water piece envisioned was the storm sewer piece. No one, not the standing room only crowd of residents & not the city, was concerned/ worried /alarmed /planning /raising the issue re any necessity of totally replacing all the water & sanitary sewer at the same time as the street was done. It was street & curb & gutter 8& storm sewer, and it was based on review and evaluation of street conditions. This is unlike the Country Club project, where it was planned since maybe 2005 that the whole OLD water system needed to be replaced, where there were water, main breaks and lots of damage and expense and emergency repairs. In contrast, our water system is not that old, the condition is not that bad (yet) and this is a prospective replacement, (without an inspection of the water system). It is an additional burden and I think we need to rethink how all these expenses get allocated. The city says they don't need to inspect the water system in the Richmond Hills Park area to see how it really is - because they're going to do it now anyway, since they are doing the street and they MIGHTAS WELL. It adds to the cost a lot. A cost that is altready high. It worsens the already significant impact of the unfair way we pay for city street projects by burdening the homeowners too much. It is money saving for the city and an additional expense for the homeowners to align these projects. Why should it be true that street replacement and water replacement are always on the same schedule? They really are not & they do not have the same life span. It's just we might as well do it once while we are there. It is more "convenient." In 2011, a policy decision was taken that we might as well pile it on as long as the street is being reconstructed while we are there we might as well do the water and sanitary sewer too which does make sense it also is a bit bridezilla, if you know what I mean. As long as we are flying down to the Bahamas for the wedding we might as well do this and have that while we are there and going to all that trouble - never mind whether or not the people who are paying for it can afford the wholesale replacement of the water system at this time, without inspection or the degree of "need" that guided previous projects. We're doing it now because we might as well, while the opportunity exists, while the street is being reconstructed anyway. Makes sense, but it also spending other people's money and money they don't have. There's almost no limit to what bridezilla can pile on. We might as well allow people to pay for sump pump connections to the storm sewer... (there are some sump pumps but I doubt those owners can afford it or think they need that on top of everything) and maybe we might as well REDO the whole gas connections to every house (but that wouldn't cost the residents anything) and we might as well! The city wants to do a wholesale replacement of the city water system at the time of street reconstruction. The area's water system is not being inspected for weak points or likely breaks. Why? Because they say they don't need to inspect it now, because it's all going to go anyway. Does that mean residents want the water system to fall apart first ?? No, but it means there could be time to work out a better, way to pay for these very pricy projects. It's like a problem in search of a solution. The contractor has experience on these big mega projects, they want to do it, it makes sense for them, the city-finds a feud examples of some water "problems" in the area and we might as well replace the whole thing. It burdens. residents. My next door neighbor put her house up for sale. Of course I agree that anything like "trips" is not a reasonable or workable or sensible approach to allocating the expense of street reconstruction. Rather I think the costs of these projects should be a city wide expense and.the basis for contributions from property owners is related to their property values. I like value because it is`often a reasonable proxy for "ability to pay ". There is some precedent to this just as there are some protections in place for seniors, and particularly low income seniors re their property taxes and'special assessments, generally because it is assumed they are on a fixed income. Not everyone is in a position to generate extra income needed to contribute10 replacing the water and sanitary sewer and the street. It's -about $185 /month, 'every month for 10 years, -if it is all financed -at 5.75 %. I expect people are /will be resigned to the project. Somehow these things need to get done. Yet the way these projects are to be paid for- is not fair and not right and not the only way and not the way other cities have managed to maintain their streets and safe water supplies. Best - regards, Susan N Susan HoWl I C E I" E ru I JAN 13 2012 From: Steve Mereness rm6i1to:smereness(d)dsginc.biz1 Sent: Fri 1/13/2012 10:38 AM To: Emilie Kastner; joni ben nettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague edinarealty.com Cc: David Goergen; Wayne Houle; Jesse Struve; Mike McNabb; Jon Bradley; Dave Sinclair Subject: Water Meter Replacement Bid Honorable Mayor and City Council members, We would like to respectfully request the'opportunity to address the Edina City Council at the upcoming council meeting regarding the bid for Water Meter Replacement Project. Representatives from Dakota Supply Group will. be at the meeting. City officials may contend that the Badger ORION radio read product, produced by Badger Meter of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, does not meet the City bid specification. Dakota Supply Group (DSG) acknowledges the specification was weighted in favor of a competing product, so much so that we were not going to be able to submit a bid. However, the City requested that DSG provide a bid. Specifically, that we bid the Badger ORION product. We have documentation illustrating this request. Furthermore, the City indicated that the ORION product would be considered an "equal' to the specified product. Sealed bids were received by the City on the afternoon of January 10, 2012. Dakota Supply Group was the low bidder by a margin of $132,000. Later that evening, we were informed that the City had decided to consider another cost variable that was not included in the sealed bid - namely battery replacement cost. If this cost variable was of such importance, and would in fact be used as the deciding factor in the bid, then this cost variable should have been included in the sealed bid. We also question the veracity of the data used in computing the "battery replacement costs" for the ORION system. It is our position that Dakota Supply Group was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder and should be awarded the contract. Thank you for your time and consideration. Regards, Steve Mereness Metering Technology Group Manager smereness(- dsginc. biz Phone #: 952- 890 -3811 Direct #: 612 -518 -8892 Fax #: 952 - 890 -8418 Toll Free #: 800 - 325 -0514 �l www.dakotasupplygroup.com Susan Howl E-1 CE ED From: Gary Cheezig jmailto :garycheezi4Cabcomcast.netlM�,� � Sent: Thu 1/12/2012 6:04 PM To: Emilie Kastner - Subject: Edina City Council Mayor Hovland, I spoke with you and all of the council members except Joni Bennett who-did not return my call regarding my encounter With' theEdina city attorney wfien i went to traffic court1ast week. Josh Sprague asked me to.:write the information and send itto him which I did. l assume he has'sent the email to you., I am still waiting to hear back from anyone as to what is going to be done as well as the•name of the contracted firm and the names of the attorneys associated with that firm. As 1 wrote to Josh Sprague at this time I am not sure how I will proceedhowever I will for sure be reporting the firm and-the specific attorney involved in this matter to the Minnesota Bar Association. Gary Cheezig 952- 925 -0015 1 Susan Howl e R E C E WE D� JAN 13 2012 From: Susan [mailto:] Sent: Thu 1/12/2012 7:32 PM To: Emilie Kastner Cc: susanpetersen55436(o)gmail.com Subject: Countryside Reconstruction Please forward this to City Council I live on Hillside Road where the roads are going to be redone this coming summer.I am on the countryside neighborhood steering committee. I was invited to a steering committee meeting at City Hall with Wayne Houle,Scott Neal etc to discuss topics that concern the countryside neighborhood. This coming summer the countryside neighborhood will be having our roads redone. In the last open house, it was brought to our attention that our assessment may be up to $12,000.00 which is a lot of money, which most people do not have. I was informed tonight that ETA is recommending adding sidewalks to this project which has not been notified to our neighborhood. I am City Council to decline the sidewalk project because of late notice to the neighborhood. I was also informed that it will cost an additional $1700.00 to each neighbor. Our neighborhood completed questionaires that we returned and stated that we do not want sidewalks or we do not need them. Their are sidewalks on Tracy which are not used that often, and not many people take walks down our street. Susan Petersen 6213 Hillside Road\ Edina, Mn 55436 Susan Howl JAN 13b From: Sasha Pimkine jmailto:apimkineCabhotmail.coml Sent: Thu 1/12/2012 10:43 PM ------ -s. - -- - -- To: Emilie Kastner Subject: Countryside Neighborhood Improvements Please forward this to City Council I live at the corner of Tracy Ave and Hillside Road. I am writing to express my concern about the plan to add the sidewalk along Hillside Road. I have been living at this location for over last five year and have not seen much foot or car traffic along Hillside Road. From my point of view adding the sidewalk is unnecessary, very expensive for residents and has not been communicated properly to affected parties. Please, consider not putting the sidewalk. Thank you for your consideration. Best Regards, Alexandre Pimking 6201 Tracy Ave Edina, MN 55436 NA71111ain Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane, 1!;,1ina, \4\ .55436. 952-927-9421, - lbrli`l:n?ranhlink.net. Dear Mr. Sullivan: I would like to pass on some comments regarding the Tracy Avenue Rehabilitation Project.. The Roundabout I believe that you arc correct in stating that roundabouts improve the flow of trallic and are safer than normal cross streets concerning vehicles. I lound documentation to agree with your comments about t.rallic. I could not find any data regarding pedestrian safety. Our concern is more For the safety of our children limn traflic flow. When we were in Sweden last year crosswalks at busy roundabouts had lights to stop lrallic and signals that indicated when it was sale to cross for pedestrians. There was also a continuous beeping that only stopped when the trallic light changed. This allowed pedestrians to know when it was sale to cross and when to stop. Perhaps you should consider something like that for school children that would have to cross at the roundabout. Bicycle Lancs The inliormation I fiOund regarding bike lanes stated a guideline Nviddi ol' from 4:5 feet depending on location. Retarding bike lanes in Edina - When I checked actual width measurements they were From 43" to 49" with most of the new ones at 5 acct. One of tic specifications stated that if tic bike lane was adjacent. to a parking lane, the bike lane could be reduced to 4 lect. That could apply to (lie bike lane on tic East side ol'Tracy. Butler Lanes This is tie grassy lane between the curb and the sidewalk. This guideline again varied between none to 5 feet depending on location. If there is not a parking lane or not a bike lane .die live -foot guideline should be followed. However, where there is a bike lane or a parking Imne next to the curb a buffer lane is not deemed necessary. This makes sense since Here would be a natural buffer lane next to the curb of from 5 to 12 feet on die East side of Tracy. Edina has streets widnout buffer lanes between the curb mid sidewalk and they do not have a parking lane or a bike-lane now. As you probably know the grassy buffer Imncs are also dillicult to maint in. On the west side of the street the 6- 10 lest next. to the street. is lull ol' weeds every spring, because ol' the salt during tic winter, unless homeowners maintain theill. Unless you decide to not install parking and bike lanes you could gain 5 feel. by eliminating dnc grassy buffer lane. This would make up die 4 lest you plan to add to the West side of Tracy Ave. The lour feet. was a major issue for many residents that said you would be encroaching on their privacy and eliminating many trees dial are part. of the neighborhood. The majority ol' dnosc attending your last meeting requested that. you take 2 Feet. From each side of the street. 11' you have to have lour feet to meet. your total footage requirements. A better compromise would lie to eliminate tic bulfcr lane. Sidewalks The guideline I Found For sidewalks was from 4 -6 leer The majority ol' dne guidelines were live feet wide. I do not think any neighbors had an issue wide this. REC EWED January 5). 2012 JAN 1 1 2012 Mr. ,Jack 1). Sullivan, P.E. City of L'dina Engineering Department. 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 Dear Mr. Sullivan: I would like to pass on some comments regarding the Tracy Avenue Rehabilitation Project.. The Roundabout I believe that you arc correct in stating that roundabouts improve the flow of trallic and are safer than normal cross streets concerning vehicles. I lound documentation to agree with your comments about t.rallic. I could not find any data regarding pedestrian safety. Our concern is more For the safety of our children limn traflic flow. When we were in Sweden last year crosswalks at busy roundabouts had lights to stop lrallic and signals that indicated when it was sale to cross for pedestrians. There was also a continuous beeping that only stopped when the trallic light changed. This allowed pedestrians to know when it was sale to cross and when to stop. Perhaps you should consider something like that for school children that would have to cross at the roundabout. Bicycle Lancs The inliormation I fiOund regarding bike lanes stated a guideline Nviddi ol' from 4:5 feet depending on location. Retarding bike lanes in Edina - When I checked actual width measurements they were From 43" to 49" with most of the new ones at 5 acct. One of tic specifications stated that if tic bike lane was adjacent. to a parking lane, the bike lane could be reduced to 4 lect. That could apply to (lie bike lane on tic East side ol'Tracy. Butler Lanes This is tie grassy lane between the curb and the sidewalk. This guideline again varied between none to 5 feet depending on location. If there is not a parking lane or not a bike lane .die live -foot guideline should be followed. However, where there is a bike lane or a parking Imne next to the curb a buffer lane is not deemed necessary. This makes sense since Here would be a natural buffer lane next to the curb of from 5 to 12 feet on die East side of Tracy. Edina has streets widnout buffer lanes between the curb mid sidewalk and they do not have a parking lane or a bike-lane now. As you probably know the grassy buffer Imncs are also dillicult to maint in. On the west side of the street the 6- 10 lest next. to the street. is lull ol' weeds every spring, because ol' the salt during tic winter, unless homeowners maintain theill. Unless you decide to not install parking and bike lanes you could gain 5 feel. by eliminating dnc grassy buffer lane. This would make up die 4 lest you plan to add to the West side of Tracy Ave. The lour feet. was a major issue for many residents that said you would be encroaching on their privacy and eliminating many trees dial are part. of the neighborhood. The majority ol' dnosc attending your last meeting requested that. you take 2 Feet. From each side of the street. 11' you have to have lour feet to meet. your total footage requirements. A better compromise would lie to eliminate tic bulfcr lane. Sidewalks The guideline I Found For sidewalks was from 4 -6 leer The majority ol' dne guidelines were live feet wide. I do not think any neighbors had an issue wide this. -------------------------- . _ . Proiect Cost The cost ol' the project is still a difficult item. for die Countryside residents to buy into that do not feel, a bike lade is necessary even if it is in die compreliensive plan. Countryside residents have been hit with lower home values, higher taxes, and a zoning. change. I for one do not Iecl a responsibility to sup�ioh bikers that. are few and probably not residents. Is there any way to reduce the cost. ol' die project. or charge bikers an additional registration fee to support bike lanes? Please consider some of these guidelines and thoughts that I have researched and outlined. I believe that the neighborhood goal for this project is to iilaintain the residential look, keep die same width of the street or keep it to a minimum. You might want to lake it strain vote on what the neighborhood wants at the "next meeting. Thank you again for your meetings and willingness to hear our concerns and hopel'ully be open to compromise. Sincerely, William Rodgers Cc: Edina Mayor and City Council Members Scott Near Karen Kurt Barbara Hoganson Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno ,Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:54 AM Susan Howl Subject: W EC E O V' q E Subject: FW: Thoughts on the Public Works Site Attachments: CaseForCommunityCenter.pdf; ATT3327171.txt JAN 1 1 2012 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @cLedina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Laura Nisi (mailto:lnisi @mac.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:01 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thoughts on the Public Works Site Happy New Year Council Members. I wanted to forward, to you a piece of writing I've been working on regarding the fate of the Public Works Site within the Grandview Area Small Plan. At a recent public meeting I expressed the hope that that area would be considered for a Community Center and one of those in attendance said "We already have a community center." I disagree with that statement and wanted to clarify why. Attached are those thoughts. Thank you for your attention. Laura Nisi (nisi @mac.com T.. fTOA,F IVEC> Susan Howl Dear friends on the. City Council & Mayor - Jim, Mary, Josh, Ann & Joni, I'd like to add, another thought regarding our pending street improvement project. I wonder if one option would be a one year moratorium on this project while funding mechanism alternatives are further explored. I suggest this because it's not the case that the city's current REU approach is long standing, the only way forward or even the way things have really been done up. till now. We are not stuck with this system with its unfair disproportionate impacts on residents.. Better alternatives for funding projects going forward can be identified and implemented, perhaps gradually over time to reduce these unfair inequities and hardships. It has to do with Big Picture Values = we value diversity and ;fairness, we. value safe `streets and water supply, maybe.we even value less wear and tear onrour.streets - why stick with SIX different trash haulers (so a dozen different trucks can go up and down our streets on yard waste &,trash day every week from April till November). Let the city contract with .GarbageMan - they use little trucks, they are more local and green and they are a lot cheaper, as the economy minded people in my neighborhood would know. A good example of some application of at least some equity to the funding process for street reconstruction is the recent Country Club, project. Did every owner in the Country Club pay (or get assessed) the same.for their recent street project? No, they didn't. Before the project commenced, residents were repeatedly'asking „legitimate questions like the one paraphrased below and the city listened o them: "Should owners residing on streets Iike Arden and Bruce pay the same for the-street project as owners residing on streets like Edina Boulevard and MoorlandPT' Is that fair? right? reasonable? appropriate? And the answer wa "s no. Their assessments differed by about $4K`or about 20 %. Areas A -2 13 and L -43 of the Country Club were assessed $11,467 for street and $4,705 for sanitary sewer or $16,172. Areas A -214 and L -49 of the Country Club were assessed $15,370 for the street and $5,0;18.96 for sanitary sewer or $20,390. The "basis" for this difference was lot size, but it really amounts to a real difference in property values. The smaller lots were lower value and they paid significantly less for the project, under the approach the city,adopted for the Country Club final assessments in 2010, not so long ago. There was no real difference in street use between areas A -213 and A- 214. There is no real relationship between linear feet on the road and what you should pay for the street. There is some logic to lower value properties paying their fair share of a city improvement project and not a disproportionate share. In the Country Club, we see the lower value property owners got a break, essentially because their property was valued lower since they owned less land Now owners in Richmond Hills Park, an area of significantly less average value than either A -213 or A -214, are faced with the disproportionate burden and understandably the reaction from the neighborhood is one of significant concern. Thank you again. Sincerely yours, Susan Khatri, 5005 Richmond Drive Susan Howl JAN 1 1 2012 Dear Mayor Hovland, Scott Neal, Karen Kurt, and Council Members Bennett, Swensen, Brindle and Sprague: Having read Richard Novack's email (below),I want to correct some erroneous information. While Take Back the Air addresses the most prevalent neighborhood air pollutants, we are not advocating for a ban on anything except outdoor recreational wood burning. We are trying to educate the public while pressing, for healthier alternatives. We would at least like to see ordinance changes to mitigate wood smoke in some ways. For instance, if you can get a permit'for having a rec fire, shouldn't it be possible to get a permit for clean air? Or disallow wood burning in the parks? Or have'some no -burn days? I'm aware that this "hired gun" has been paid to deny the seriousness of wood smoke issues and to incriminate someone who is doing her best to educate the public and limit toxic wood smoke (me). In line with the ADA Guidelines, it makes sense that parks and other public spaces should be accessible to everyone. Especially those with asthma - -and others to whom wood smoke presents an actual "physical barrier ". You may want to check, out how many authorities now claim that wood smoke not only causes asthma but also cancer, and that it is implicated in birth defects and premature death in people of all ages. See www. burning issues.orq. It also concerns me that Mr. Novack appears to be using a blackmail -like technique to intimidate city officials from addressing wood smoke. As savvy politicians, you probably sense what's going on here. As always, thank you for your consideration. Julie Mellum From: "Richard Novack < Richard _politicalmoderates.org> Date: December 31, 2011 2:07:10 PM' C,ST To:. "'Edina City Council "' <edinamail(c_ci.edina.mn.us> Cc: "'Joni Bennett "' <jonibennett12�D_comcast.net >, "'Josh Sprague "' <joshsprague edinarealty.com >, "'Mary Brindle "' <mbrindle(a_ci.edina.mn.us >, "'Scott Neal "' <sneal(a-)_ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: Looming Pollution Controversy in Edina Mayor, Council, and Manager Neal A man connected with my political work, work which some of you.also are aware, wants to hire me to create a public outcry and resident firestorm over Julie Mellum's "nonsensical" anti - pollution efforts through the council. To be truthful, his first request was for me to run a recall campaign of council members who supported, the Centennial fireplace change "and waste of money ". I explained that Minnesota law doesn't have a petitionable council recall process. After that he asked that I "surprise pack" a city council meeting with people wanting to make public comment. There is enough money available to mail thousands of incendiary pieces to carefully targeted recipients — and Ms. Mellum certainly has provided sufficient ammunition for me. I've attached PDF's of her website where she not only`wants to ban woodsmoke, but backyard grills, lawnmowers, yard chemicals, perfumes, laundrV fragrances. Much of the.reference. mate rial and brochure she quotes was written by ....:.... her. (attached] Her letter to'the editor last week, especially as (I assume)-Katy headlined it, must have made your skin crawl. I have a mantra I sometimes forget to follow "never argue with a fanatic, never argue with a .... ".But sometimes you have to take them on whenthey are about to do damage. I'm not sure any of you were on the Edina Council the last time I caused city hall to be packed with riled up crtiieris for an issue.'l've done it a number of times since about 1967. And frankly, Mgr. Neal has predicted this was going to get ugly in his blog as I recall. This is an.important.set of issues to a lot of people in our community who DO.care a lot about the environment but are also rational practical people. Personally, I would like to keep it that way. There are quality of life issues and other considerations for living in Edina. One "next step" that:was raised to me and was:posted on Facebook's Politics in Edina a while back is that natural gas— primarily methane — is a considerable carcinogen, so would -we next ban its use? Or automotive exhaust? Or school bus diesel exhaust? Or batteries and CFL lamps because of mercury? Or electric devices because generation plants cause greenhouse gases and wireszemit radiation? There really is no end, but there is practicality. This isn't going to go away, but I think we could all manage it practically. I'm sure each of you already think so too. I have way too much to do in this coming election year that I don't want this contract — but would do it if necessary both because I too care, and rather than let some outsider.be brought in. I'm sure you too want this off the Council's plate as there is a lot more important work to do. Yes, I regularly watch council meetings (and school boards, and legislature, etc.) in the background as I do other work. You have plenty already lined up. So if someone, maybe Jim, wants to let me know if we can find a good path, please -let me know. If you want to hold some kind of pre - planned hearing on these issues this year, maybe I can get them to spend the money on mustering people out for that, rather than the council attack and media - circus method. I really think Mgr. Neal and his staff have more important things'to do within today's budgeting. Lastly, in wishing all of you a Happy New Year, let me share, in both seriousness and humor of the season, another PDF by Troy Walker [attached] re: Santa Claus's dilemma in a Politically Correct world. Dick Novack Richard V Novack PoliticalModerates. org The Case for a Community Center as part of the Grandview Small Area Plan Background At a public meeting last month of the Grandview Small Area Plan group, someone expressed a hope for a community center at the old Public Works site. At that time, another person in attendance remarked "Why do we need a community center -- we have a perfectly good one across the street ?" This sentiment has been heard before, in reference to the building known as the "Edina Community Center" on Normandale Boulevard. While called a community center, this building is actually home to the Edina school district offices, Normandale elementary school, Early Childhood Education, a handful of district- related organizations, as well as numerous community -based organizations. Of course, Community Education offices are there and they use a handful of classrooms for some of their programming, which is apparently why the "Community Center" title is used., While this building is an important resource for the community, I suggest that it does not serve as a true community center for many reasons. First, most of the space is neither intended nor available for community use, as it is designated for many other purposes. Secondly, the building itself is cumbersome, confusing, and very outdated. Third, parking is limited at best, and sometimes completely unavailable if there is a function at the middle school. Last, due to the many scheduled events, there are little to no "open" times in the building, which is compounded by the fact that the building is closed on Sundays. What is called the Edina Community Center is not a civic- oriented building, but rather a school district entity not operated by the city. What We Have and What We Lack Edina has many public facilities, to be sure. However, not one of them, with the possible exception of the Art Center (a facility sorely in need of upgrade itself) exists solely for the use and benefit of the community at large and on a year -round basis. The Aquatic Center, obviously, has a very narrowly prescribed use and season, and is also meant to draw from outside the community to sustain itself. The space at Edinborough offers limited opportunities, is shared with residential and commercial entities and is far from the center of the community. Braemar is another example of a single focus, seasonal amenity. The Library /Senior Center near Grandview Square doesn't fit the bill of being available to the community at large, by definition of its age limits and the limited hours and space the library has. The space at Arneson Acres is limited in focus and times of use as well. What Edina is missing is a facility that serves the entire community in both structured and unstructured ways, that is accessible seven days a week year round. A facility that is centrally located and designed for this new millennium. In short, what we have are disparate facilities that each serve a segment of the community with a special interest. What we lack is a central place to gather, to exchange ideas and information, to learn, to play and to connect. The ODDortunl Here is a description from the website of another city of their community center: "This state -of -the -art facility is designed to be the community's center, a focal point of civic pride and a resource for every Suisun City resident." We have an opportunity right now to designate the Public Works Site as a place to act as this community's center. To be that focal point of civic pride and to be a resource for every resident of Edina, from birth to retirement. What that looks like doesn't really matter at this point. Clearly an accessible, flexible, welcoming and vibrant space. Maybe the focus is on recreation, with a walking track, gyms, fitness areas, and a pool combined with a lounge and rooms for meetings, classes, and large gatherings. Maybe the focus is on performance and education, with a theater, classrooms, craft rooms and snack area. Maybe it is a combination of all of these things. What does matter is the opportunity, right now, to decide to make this intersection of Edina a focal point for connections and engagement. With the plan for a possible redesign of the entrances /exits at HWY loo, a great connection would exist between city hall and this new space that would make this area a centerpiece of civic pride and experience. We would then have an opportunity to say on our own website: "This state -of- the-artfacility is designed to be the community's center, a focal point of civic pride and a resource for every Edina resident." Kali na, Will, Gisvold & Q;I k, PLLP ra INEPEOVED Annie P. Baldwin, Ph.D. JAN 0 9 2012 5628 Xerxes Avenue South, Edina, Mn 55410 -2637 -- ------- - - - --- January 9, 2012 Mr. Josh Sprague Councilman. Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, ,MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mr. Sprague: I write in response to an e -mail message that you sent, a few weeks ago, to my neighbor, Dr. Bill Price. You responded to questions raised about the proposed installation of sidewalks on Xerxes Avenue South. Although the city, county and state have agreed to pay for the construction of the sidewalks, there are other issues that must be given serious consideration before proceeding with this project. There are disabled and senior citizens who reside on Xerxes Avenue South. An extremely important issue of who will bear the additional financial burden for expenses associated with this sidewalk installation, especially snow removal. While some residents may not have a problem clearing snow from portions of the sidewalk, there are those of us who cannot remove snow because of arthritic, cardiovascular and other health conditions related to aging. The absence of good physical health and life on fixed incomes make the entire proposition an untenable situation, at best, for me and others. In addition to the circumstances cited above, the slope of my front yard, as with some others, requires the purchase and installation of a retaining wall to help prevent or reduce soil erosion. The proposed construction also dictates that the yards will have to be torn apart and reconstructed. This will be accompanied by uprooting and replanting trees, as well as bushes/ shrubbery, and the removal and replacement of decorative rocks and other landscaping items. All of this, as indicated previously, becomes an additional financial burden to everyone, like me, who cannot afford that financial imposition. Has anyone taken into account that there are native trees more than 50 years old growing in many yards on Xerxes Avenue South? An environmental impact and feasibility study needs to be conducted before any real serious consideration is given to (or actually doing so) in cutting down trees, planting Mr. Josh Sprague January 9, 2012 . Page Two. new trees, replacing the sod, and other. There will be a loss of habitat for native birds and squirrels'that.live and nest. in these trees. Why not keep the green space that already exists?, It is difficult to believe that the City of Edina is -not committed to a green environment in as many sectors as possible. Certain actions should be taken before Edina City Council imposes its' authority on the residents of Xerxes Avenue South. The:_least, of these actions is giving my neighbors and: me the courtesy of a visit to the neighborhood with sufficient time to, speak directly to residents in a sincere effort_ ,to learn about their concerns and to understand the actual layout of community. It is extremely reasonable to expect and ask that you and other members of the City Council poll the residents,and Bold public meetings after your initial visit to the neighborhood to gather as many perspectives as possible. for direct consideration. Capital im provements should never be undertaken with a "one size fits all" assumption. It is an unreasonable way to treat tax - paying citizens. I urge you and your colleagues to not move forward with this project without giving firm, non - superficial, fair consideration to the issues raised in this communication, as well as others that you will glean from talking to and hearing from your constituents. My neighbors and I look forward to your working with us and placing real value to our opinions and concerns as they pertain specifically to the proposed sidewalk construction project on Xerxes Avenue South. I am available to discuss the issues raised at a time of our mutual convenience. Sincerely yours, Annie P. Baldwin, Ph.D. Cc: Joni Bennett Mary Brindle James B Hovland Ann Swenson IAN 0 5 1012 Edina City Council; Enclosed is a copy of the letter I sent to you on 6/6/11. 115/1 5008 W. 56`x' St. Edina, MN 55436 I had and still have the expectation of a reply. I am requesting that you read and respond to my concerns outlined in the 6/6/11 letter. Sincerely, 9,4� 6,n anz�J Jill Emanuel 6/6/11 5008 W. 56th St Edina, MN 55436 Edina City Council James Hovland Joni .Bennett Mary Brindle Josh Sprague Ann Swenson Edina City Hall 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 This past ,Sunday, 6/5/1 1, several cars on the street where I live were cited in violation of City Code: Section 1400.10 Subd. 7 Limited Parking Zones. B. Six Hour Parking. No person in charge of any vehicle shall. park or permit the vehicle to stand upon any street or-'highway for more than six consecutive hours, unless otherwise designated on erected and installed signs. This paragraph shall not apply to vehicles used by persons while such persons are present and actively engaged in services performed on the premises of others, such as painting, home construction or repair, installation of appliances, cleaning, or fumigating. D. Shifting of Parked Vehicle. To regulate limited parking, any vehicle moved a distance of not more than three tenths of a mile during the limited parking period shall be deemed to have remained stationary. The majority of the cars cited belong to the homeowners. We were all surprised as not a single neighbor. I talked to was aware of this I have lived in Edina fora total of 36 years, and most of my neighbors are also long time residents. My concern over this issue is that the city of Edina has not made it known to the majority of residents about the 6 hour limited parking., Why does the' city choose to enforce such a little known regulation witout first informing home owners if they are in violation and give them the chance to correct it and /or learn the regulation, as is done when a home owner is in violation of a city code involving "nuisances" on their property? .. The officer writing out the "tickets" explained that the cars on our block were being ticketed as a complaint had been issued. It is very hard for us residents to understand that cars, less than %a block away, can park for a length of time- longer than 6 hours. My neighbors and myself are being required to follow a set of rules that the majority of Edina residents do not have to. Along with responding to the above stated concerns, I would also like to have you respond to the following questions. At times .in the future, I will be having family members, (along with my 2 children who are, home from college and have their own cars), staying at my house. They will be overnight guests, and there will'be more cars at my home that can not fit in my driveway. What are practical solutions for this, as this is a common occurrence for many of the families living on my block? As cited in the code, for a car to be considered "moved" it has to be moved a distance of more than 3/10 of a mile. On Sunday, my brother - in -law's car was parked on the street in front of my house and his tires had been marked. Around noon, he took his car and ran several errands. He returned home about an hour later. He observed the officer ticketing cars, so he spoke briefly with the officer. He questioned if he would receive a ticket as he had moved his car, yet he was planning on parking his car on the street directly in front of my house where it had been when the tires were marked. The officer recommended that he park in the driveway. My question is, could he have been ticketed as he had moved the car, and had been gone for at least an hour, and he had moved it for a total of much more than the 3/10 mile. Would he have received.a ticket if he had returned to the same general area and the, police officer did not know that that car had been driven? Also, does the "clock" start again after the first 6 hours? After that first 6 -hour violation, can the car be parked on the street ... does the "clock" start again at that time. for a 6- hour time frame? In conclusion, I feel as if my neighbors and I are being targeted /harassed by a neighbor. If only a specific area is being held accountable, and it is only due to one complaining neighbor, I view this as a form of harassment. Thank you for attention to this.matter and I look forward to hearing your response to my questions and concerns. Sincerely, Susan Howl Subject: FW: Richmond Hills street and sewer project Dear friends on the City Council & Mayor - Jim, Mary, Josh, Ann & Joni, Happy 2012 and thank you all for your dedicated service. JAN 0 i 2012 I wanted to pass on my part of a conversation taking place in our neighborhood book club re the pending street project. I wonder if there is some proactive way to more forward with the necessary projects and also address the significant issues about how we are funding our projects? Thank you. Susan Khatri 5005 Richmond Drive From: dragontales3l @hotmail.com To: madoriebl3 yahoo.com; abby.rooney( gmail.com; alisonjanel2 msn.com; bellfaerie(dyahoo.com; bhltate(&comcast.net; teena.bolin @gmail.com; dohnson66900)msn.com; dickbevrooney @aol.com; esclarke06burnet.com; ianvincelCabaol.com; kanecarman comcast.net; kellianne williamson @yahoo.com; emily knodt0uhc.com; IottiezQ@hotmail.com; meredithwold0hotmail.com; susanmeyerl3(a)comcast.net; mich- alCabcorricast.net; molly@imaoinecoaching.com; renata .thompson(aOmedtronic.com; sks0873(cbmsn.com; scrowley (a)mspcommunications.com; sims0007 @umn.edu; svucenich@hotmail.com Subject: RE: Richmond Hills street and sewer project Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:45:26 -0600 Hi Book Clubbers, Thanks for mentioning this project Marge. While I agree this project is necessary and the results will likely be pretty nice (I sure hope so for nearly 17K), I hope the city can recognize the disparate impact of the funding mechanism for these, street /sewer projects on our neighborhood and do something positive about this disparate impact, instead of just throwing up their hands because "they've always done it this way" and therefore they are somehow bound forever to do it this same way. The fact is, the mechanism used by the City of Edina is a not a fair or reasonable or appropriate way to fund this project because of the disparate impact on the property owners re: this assessment, relative to other projects in the city. Always and forever are very long times and the mechanism Edina has used to fund street projects is not the_ only fair way these projects can be successfully undertaken. It shouldn't be necessary to wait forever to address this fundamentally unfair approach to repairing our streets and sewers. The costs for this project should be borne in a manner that at least approaches some degree of fundamental fairness that I'm sure all homeowners can accept. The Country Club project interest rate (set in October 2010, after the project was completed) was 5.75% over ten years. The interest rate on our project may be similar or possibly even less? The Country Club project included the brick paver crosswalks, sod, and side walk repairs (since the neighborhood already has sidewalks on both sides and already has decorative lighting.) The neighborhood successfully prevented some proposed traffic calming measure like speed bumps. The costs per REU for the Country Club project were either $16,172 per REU ($11,467 for street and $4,705 for sanitary sewer for areas A -213 and L -43) or $20,390 per REU ($15,370 for the street and $5,018.96 for sewer for areas L -214 and L -49), so you'd have to say the costs are similar for about the same thing, with the current estimate of $16,800 per REU for our project. My view is the disparate impact of the way-we fun_ d our improvement projects is.fundamentally unfair and requires review. My property taxes are just under $3500. The proposed assessment -is almost five times my property taxes. So, over. ten years, this special assessment represents about a 50,percent increase in what I will pay. This impact is way out of proportion to the impact of other projects. There are `plenty of houses on Browndale, for example, where,the property taxes are in the neighborhood of $16K to $20K to`$22K and UP per year, so for those REUs, the' street &sewer improvement project was a "mere" single multiple of their annual property _tax or less. For a- similar impact as our project, their special assessment could have been in the neighborhood of 100K, an absurd amount and more than it actually cost of course, or about five times their annual property taxes.... which is what this proposed assessment means to me and my family. Property taxes are some indication of relative value and also some indication of what property owners may find. reasonable to afford. For my street to cost me five times my annual property taxes,. while a few,, blocks away the- street expense, is about one year's worth of property tax bump (give ortake) demonstrates the fundamental unfairness of this funding approach to street and sewer replacement. My vie ww is the city is tone deaf •about this project, with their repeated inquiry about home owner's pet containment fences and underground sprinkler systems and advising people to consult with their various contractors and service employees:... We've lived here about fifteen years now and I don't find it a neighborhood.of invisible pet- fences or a lot of underground sprinkler systems. Rather I see a .neighborhood of about half black, top driveways, half dated concrete driveways and perhaps one paver driveway -on our street (that.the city featured. in their power point presentation) that I believe was installed by the homeowners-themselves. Plus, our neighborhood project does not include either decorative, lighting or any sidewalk anywhere. - I expect part of the' lack of interest in those'amenities. [cited by the,city in the. ir letter] was due to the projected cost people likely felt they just couldn't afford any decorative lighting or enjoyany sidewalks on top of the street..and sewer costs of the project, even when the project cost was thought to'be $8K = ..$12K, as it was described. at the standing "room only meeting I attended about the project. Last night my daughter needed to go to the house at the corner of Richmond Lane and` Richmond Drive. It was so dark and •icy she needed a ride. It is.not the case that our neighborhood does not want safe lighted streets or safe pedestrian walk ways, people just know they can't afford it on top of everything else. So, bottom line, this project will almost certainly move forward and is necessary - and I really like the proposal for the Windsor /Kent/Warwick Place area - and who doesn't think part of Kent looks pretty down at the heels streetwise? Yet I don't agree it is impossible to devise a more equitable and fair way to fund these projects, given their disparate impact on the community. The impact of this project on homeowners will extend to 2023. The city's historicaLfunding approach has an impact that is fundamentally- unfair and deserves to be reviewed now for more equitable alternatives. I don't agree that the only option for funding these sorts of projects is to continue as they have been funded in the past. Sincerely yours, Susan Khatri 5005 Richmond Drive P.S. My mom lives on West 44th between Wooddale & Browndale (since 1966) and her share of that major street project will be $2;200. It all depends on the kind of street you live on. For example; the new sidewalk project completed on Valley View Road this summer (new sidewalk, new driveway aprons (and sometimes about half the driveway), watered sod and some stone retaining walls, plus city plowing of the sidewalk, was all completed at no cost to the homeowners. Yes, of course, West 44th and Valley View Road are major streets with more traffic They are a different sort of street. Our residential neighborhood streets are subject to different funding sources for replacement. Yes, of course I bought a house next_, to Highway 100 because of its lower cost and lower property taxes. It makes all the difference. Yet, the funding sources for our residential city streets should have some more rational relationship to fundamental equity and fairness than the current approach. Susan Howl �IS��U V E��� January 4, 2012 �A� i �0? i Mayor Hovland and City Council member Josh Spraque, _ _ _ _ .......... It was apparent from your laughter and comments, after I spoke last night, that you once again missed the significance of my remarks. In case others missed them as well lam copying the entire council on this email. It is critical tlidfwe are allowed to speak freely (loquacious) when the topic impacts the livelihood of our families and our freedoms and where knowlege of the truth [by officials able to help] could spare grave injustices and tragic consequences. However, when a person (one that professes to be open - minded) combines their lack of knowledge (ignorance) with open defiance of any attempt to seek the truth, ignores requests that can be validated with inquiries, and refuses. to engage, outside assistance (B CA) to address a very serious offense (vandalizing Edina churches), possible police corruption, etc. - then arrogance, combined with ignorance, will only make matters worse for everyone. When I said that I did not want the City Council to "pass the baton" on their responsibility and obligations to investigate a residents concerns, it was meant to inform you about accountability in a lawsuit. The extent of your E &O insurance, the financial coverage of Edina and the police department to lawsuits, the insurance companies awareness of my requests as the normal course of reviewing possible or pending litigation, and all other avenues for addressing the cost of city lawsuits - should play a role in determining the council's actions. If you,continue to ignore my requests to engage the BCA, it is my intent that each of you, individually and collectively, be held accountable for the full financial impact of any lawsuit. It would be wrong for the residents of Edina to bear any financial impact. It was December 5th when I made my first written request. There has been no response provided. I spoke with Detective Konters around 9PM last night. He was on duty outside the council meeting room. He informed me that the reason the drug evidence (my 911 call) was marked for destruction, and not sent to the crime lab for fingerprinting, was because of lack of money. Also according to Vik, the reason the DUI driver was not brought up on charges was they [Edina police] don't have time or money to pursue petty misdemeanors. All citizens of Edina should be aware of the handling of this incident as it is a public safety issue - and one that. obviously needs to be addressed. Please forward this email to the insurance provider for the City of Edina and provide me with a name and contact information. Sincerely, Steve Willett 5705 Kemrich Drive Edina, MN 55439 Susan Howl ED JAN 0 4 2012 From: DUHRHAMMER16d)comcast.net Lmailto :DUHRHAMMER1Ca)comcast.netl Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 5:33 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jonibennettl2()comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague@edinareality.com Cc: aoorter @refinedllc.com Subject: 6109 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, MN; Proposed subdivision of Lots 22 and 23, Block 23, Fairfax, Hennepin County, Minnesota Dear Council Members: First let me introduce myself. My name is Dan Uhrhammer, and I reside at 6101 Oaklawn Avenue. My Home is at the corner of 61st, and Oaklawn. Just north of the property listed above which is proposed for subdivision. I have resided at this location since 1991. As I'm sure you have already realized. I have major concerns regarding this subdivision, and the impact it will have on my home aesthetics, personal privacy, view, access to sun, and more importantly the value of my home. I have had a personal meeting with Andy Porter of Refined, LLC at my home to discuss this subdivision. His reponse was basically( they will build to the customers liking, with a price point of $800,000 for each property). The homes will be positioned 5 feet from the property lines, and will be located forward to the street set back line. I was then informed that they would be similar to the homl they are building at the corner of 59th and Fairfax. To the point of my correspondence. I would like to invite each of you to visit me at my home, prior to the hearing on January 11, 2012. Then you can see firsthand the effects that this subdivision and the building of two homes like that on Fairfax, would have on my property. I am available to you days at your convenience. Please feel to contact me at 651- 248 -5542 at any time. Thank you for your consideration! Sincerely, Dan Uhrhammer 6101 Oaklawn Ave. Edina, MN. 56171 ---------- ..... . --------------------------- - ----------- ------ - ------- Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 8:57 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Viking Project - thanks you C JAN 0 4 2012 ----------- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ---- v. ,: 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 J I lbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living. Learning, Raisin- Families Doing Business We're a do.too.;n ... working to make the healthy choice the easy Choice! From: gary hoch rrnaiIto:gatyhochCahotrnaiI.corn1 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:31 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Viking Project - thanks you To: Edina City Counsel cc Jack Sullivan. Tonight I appeared before the Edina City Council for the first time. I want to thank the council members for their professional and courteous handling of our concerns regarding the proposed special assessment against Vernon Hills Road. Thanks for the hard work you do for the City of Edina. Gary Hoch 6610 Vernon Hills Road Edina, Mn.55436 952-929-1942 galyhoch 2chotmail.com 1 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 3, 2012 10:15 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. I. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 19, 2011, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 19, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Ih RESOLUTION 2012 -02 ADOPTED REQUESTING THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A MODIFICATION TO THE SOUTHEAST REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Executive Director Neal explained the City Council had previously directed staff to investigate the process necessary to expand the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District. He stated the requested action of the HRA directing the City Council to conduct a public hearing on a possible modification to the Southeast Redevelopment Plan and to possibly make a modification to the tax increment financing plan For Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District. The action, taken both by the City Council and the Council in its role as the Housing & Redevelopment Authority, would initiate the formal process to amend the District in a manner that will expand the geographic area in size where the City could expend funds from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Mr. Neal stated that staff would prepare a map of the proposed amended District, publish the necessary notices and prepare all documentation necessary to allow the modification to take place according to the following schedule: January 25, 2012 Planning Commission reviews modifications to determine if they are in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan and adopts a resolution approving the modifications. January 26, 2012 Date of publication of hearing notice and map (at least ten days but not more than 30 days prior to hearing. February 6, 2012 HRA adopts a resolution approving the modifications. February 6, 2012 City Council holds a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and the proposed Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District (County No. 1203) and passes resolution approving the modifications. 2012 Ehlers files modifications with the MN Department of Revenue, Office of the State Auditor, and Hennepin County. Chair Hovland noted he would be out of town on February 6, 2012, and asked the proposed hearing be moved to February 21, 2012. Commissioner Brindle made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sprague to adopt Resolution No. 2012 -02 requesting the Edina City Council conduct a public hearing on a modification to the Southeast Redevelopment Plan and a modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District noting the change of the hearing date to February 21, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Neal reviewed two possible areas that could be considered in the proposed modification: MINUTES /EDINA HRA /JANUARY 3, 2012 Option A would expand the Southeast Redevelopment District to include the Grandview Square Areas, 44th and France Area, West 70th Street and Cahill area and the Highway 62 Pedestrian Bridge Area. Option B would expand the Southeast Redevelopment District by connecting the Centennial Lakes area to the Grandview area, but would not include the other areas detailed in Option A. Commissioner Swenson noted that she would like to see the 50th and France area included in the District's expansion to allow the use of TIF Funding for the proposed parking improvements. Commissioner Sprague asked for clarification regarding which pedestrian bridges would be included in Option A. Staff explained that Option A would include the 50th and France area. Commissioner Bennett stated she was adamantly opposed to the inclusion of the area of 44th and France into the Development District. She stated many years ago a Redevelopment Plan was created had existed that put a pall over the area. Member Bennett stated that it took a great deal of work on the part of the Morningside Neighborhood Association in 2004 „°a.to have the previous plan rescinded and she would not support any action placing that geographic area into a Redevelopment Plan. Commissioner Bennett added that with the proposal not presented to HRA members before the meeting, she had not had any time to review and study it. Following the discussion Commissioner Sprague made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Swenson to use the geographic area as shown by Option A. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Ill. RESOLUTION 2012 -01 ADOPTED AUTHORIZING REDEMPTION OF CERTAIN MATURITIES OF PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2009A Mr. Neal explained the City Council adopted a budget resolution at the December 20, 2011 City Council meeting that included a transfer of $950,000 to the Debt Service Fund to call a portion of the Series 2009A Public Works Bonds. The original discussion was to call the principal maturities of February 1, 2013 through 2017 maturities and the February 1, 2029 and 2030 maturities. The rational for these maturities was the 2013 through 2017 bonds would coincide with the last five years of G.O. Park and Recreation Bonds originally issued in 1996 and refunded in 2005 (after the final maturity in 2017 annual tax supported debt service will decrease by approximately $600,000 per year). The rational for the final two maturities was these maturities were the highest interest rate. He presented a draft resolution, which staff recommended the HRA adopt, which would authorize the redemption of the certain maturities of the 2009A bonds described above. Commissioner Swenson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sprague adopting Resolution No. 2012 -01 authorizing the redemption of certain maturities of Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned-at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director w9NNA� �?l O e rota i REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III (HRA Agenda) From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion 0 Information Date: January 17, 2012 Subject: Expanded Walkway Easement Agreement between Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. and the City of Edina. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the proposed Amendment to the Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement between Jerry's Enterprises and the City of Edina to expand the southern pedestrian bridge between the parking ramp and Jerry's Hardware and Grocery. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Jerry's Enterprises is requesting consideration by the City of Edina's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to expand the existing pedestrian bridge that currently connects the City parking ramp to Jerry's Grocery Store. The existing bridge is four feet wide, and used as an exit from the grocery store. (See attached pictures.) The bridge is located on property owned by the City of Edina. Therefore, as the property owner, the decision to expand the bridge and amend the Easement rests with the HRA. With the change of use of Jerry's Pharmacy to Jerry's Hardware, Jerry's is requesting that the pedestrian bridge be expanded from four to ten feet wide to provide a direct access to the hardware store in addition to the grocery store. The new entrance would be used to provide a customer access to the rental and repair area of the hardware store. In doing so, the bridge would be widened for customers bringing in or taking out larger equipment, such as lawn mowers and snow blowers. This access would allow an alternative to bringing in and taking out this type of equipment through the front of the store. One parking stall would have to be removed from the parking ramp. Jerry's Enterprises would pay for and construct the proposed new pedestrian ramp. The plans for the new pedestrian ramp are attached to the agreement and labeled as Exhibit D. The city attorney has reviewed the attached agreement, and found it to be acceptable, if the City Council is agreeable to allowing the expansion of this pedestrian bridge. ATTACHMENTS: Pictures of the existing pedestrian ramps that connect from the parking ramp to Jerry's Proposed Amendment to the Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement I �I' ,r,....__._� __ w _ , ., . .� , ., , ' � W� M aNf 9 L i� I J � S J IF f rj P. C7 �; y �" �'' :\ efi �tyy� -- . =.�K3 - ►f -`^�� ,may f y, �' x�* 4n' "'dAi"riE t '4+q � , '��y -a .. '.: -r THIRD AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT (this "Third Amendment ") is made as of January , 2012, by and among the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "HRA" ), and JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Jerry's "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City, the HRA and Jerry's entered into that certain Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of February 1, 1987, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on March 19, 1.987, as Document Number 5242349 and in the office of the Hennepin County'Registrar of Titles on January 29, 1988, as Document Number 1905238 ( "Original Easement "), as amended by,(a) that.certain First Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of May 28, 1987, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on April 26, 1988, as Document Number 5400795 and in the office.of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on April 22, 1988, as Document Number 1922982 ( "First Amendment ") and (b) that certain Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of July 7, 2011, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on July. 11, 2011, as Document Number A9671595 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 11, 201.1; as Document Number 7486999;1 ( "Second Amendment "). WHEREAS, the City is the:owner of certain real property legally described on Exhibit A attached to this Third Amendment ( "City Property "). WHEREAS, a parking ramp is constructed on the City Property ( "Parking Ramp„) DOCS - 059891345 WHEREAS, Jerry's is the owner of certain real property legally described on Exhibit B attached to this Third Amendment ( "Jerry's Property "). WHEREAS, a multi -story office and commercial building is constructed on the Jerry's Property ( "Building "). WHEREAS, the Original Easement, the First Amendment and the Second Amendment are collectively referred to as the "Easement" in this Third Amendment. Terms not otherwise defined in this Third Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed in the Easement. WHEREAS, Section 2(B) of the Original Easement provided Jerry's with the right to construct pedestrian bridges connecting the Building to the Parking Ramp ( "Pedestrian Bridges "). WHEREAS, Exhibit C attached to the Original Easement depicts the location of the Pedestrian Bridge Easement in the location in which a Pedestrian Bridge was originally constructed. WHEREAS, Exhibit C attached to the Original Easement fails to depict an additional initial Pedestrian Bridge which was constructed in conjunction with the construction of the Parking Ramp and has been used since that time, which additional initial Pedestrian Bridge is located southerly of the Pedestrian Bridge Easement shown on Exhibit C attached to the Original Easement and which southerly Pedestrian Bridge is depicted by crosshatching on Exhibit C attached to this Third Amendment. WHEREAS, Jerry's now desires to widen that southerly Pedestrian Bridge, to encompass the entire area depicted on Exhibit C attached to this Third Amendment as the southerly Pedestrian Bridge Easement. WHEREAS, the parties desire to correct the Easement to accurately indicate the existence of the southerly Pedestrian Bridge Easement and to provide for the widened area of that southerly Pedestrian Bridge Easement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Southerly Pedestrian Bridge. The Easement is hereby corrected to accurately provide for an expanded southerly Pedestrian Bridge Easement with a maximum width of 10 feet in the location depicted on Exhibit C (page 1) attached to this Third Amendment and as depicted on the Exhibit attached hereto as Exhibit C (page 2). 2. Exhibit C. Exhibit C attached to the Original Easement is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit C attached to this Third Amendment. 156730v2 2 DOCS- 0598913 -0 3. Confirmation. Except as specifically set forth in this Third Amendment, the Easement is hereby confirmed and ratified. IN AGREEMENT, the parties have executed this Third Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA By Its Mayor And by Its City Manager JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. By Its President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its Chairman And by Its Secretary The foregoing Third Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2012, by James Hovland, the Mayor, and by Scott Neal, the City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public 156730v2 DOCS- #3598913 -v5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Third Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2012, by James Hovland, the Chairman, and by Ann Swenson, the Secretary, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota body politic and corporation, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Third Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2012, by Robert N. Shadduck, the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. (DKP) 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 (612) 371 -3528 156730v2 4 DOCS43598913 -0 CONSENT BY MORTGAGEE Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance corporation, as the Mortgagee of a portion of the Jerry's Property, as described in the foregoing Third Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement, pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated May 16, 1995 and recorded May 17, 1995 in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 6428384 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2608876 hereby consents to the terms and conditions of the foregoing Third Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement. ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY And STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF COOK ) Its Its The foregoing Consent by Mortgagee was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2012, by and , each an Authorized Signatory of Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance corporation, on behalf of the insurance corporation. Notary Public 156730v2 5 DOCS- 0598913 -0 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of City Property Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 3, Grand View Heights, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 15673M 6 DOCS43598913 -0 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Jerry's Property Lots 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 3, Grand View Heights, according to the plat thereof on file or of record with the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, Block 3, and Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 4, Grand View Heights, according to the plat thereof on file or of record with the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that portion thereof taken for highway purposes. That part of Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, Block 4, Grand View Heights, and that part of the adjacent portion of West Half of vacated Summit Avenue adjoining Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of the North line of said Lot 13 and the South line of said Lot 15, all of which lies Easterly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of State Highway No. 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. That part of Lot 16 lying East of a line drawn from a point on the South line thereof distant 28 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 16 to a point on the North line of said lot distant 47 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, Block 4, "Grand View Heights and that part of the West Half of the adjoining vacated Summit Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 16, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. 156730v2 7 DOCS- 43598913 -v5 EXHIBIT C — page 1 Depiction of Pedestrian Bridaes . � .. ,,rte �.r�..; , •c_ yey ��4� QF � • V� '4}j r • 1 Mgj � ht:sswsT,u�..1 ��ttI11It :� 15673M 8 DOCS- 43598913 -v5 EXHIBIT C — page 2 Depiction of Southerly 10 Foot Wide Pedestrian Bridge FY .......... ....... ........ Ll :ica �OUNIT FER Mo . .. . ....... 4`1 ........ ........ ..... IFET TLL6, .... ...... . . .... je v, r x A, . . . ....... . ..... ..... .. ....... ...... 15�,. /z ok? . . ..... EXIT NO FREND XnT. CONr,,. F! OOR - H7, RA E.'.j-.E,/AT0R' SOLI S-i I CON RETI.r ....... ...... . .. .. ........ . Ct,41J HALL ITO 51E "A.-NITLD 156730v2 9 DOCS-0598913-0 'S-lAJNTA /'XT J 145, MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thurs., Nov. 10, 2011 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Members Gubrud, Gupta, Jennings, Kostuch, Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Tucker, and Chair Latham. Late Arrival: lyer and Zarrin Absent: Paterlini Staff Present: Jesse Struve and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Agenda was approved as written. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Agenda was approved as written. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Working Group. Commissioner Paterlini is joining the Energy Working Group. Perspective Member Susan Danzl was removed as a prospective member from the Water Quality Working Group. B. B3 data update. On November 101h Sarah Steinman was approved as the new intern to assist Jesse Struve with entering Edina's B3 data. C. Energy WG 1. Solar panel project. Jesse Struve gave an update on the installation process with the Building Department. 2. Solar /wind ordinance amendments task force. Chair Latham reviewed comments received from Planning Director Cary Teague. The Planning Commission will review the ordinance prior to it being reviewed at a future City Council work session. 3. PACE commercial energy district. City Manager Scott Neal, Lynn Hinkle and Brad Hanson gave an update on the progress of PACE also known as the Edina Emerald Energy Program (EEEP). Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Tucker to approve the EEEP Resolution and support the EEEP Program Report and Administrative Guidelines that was distributed on November 9th to EEC Members. Roll Call was taken: Ayes: Gubrud, lyer, Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Tucker, Zarrin, Latham Abstain: Kostuch Absent: Paterlini Motion Carried PACE will be presented at the November 15th City Council Meeting. D. Purchasing Report. Commissioner Kostuch met with City staff and gave an update on the draft purchasing policy. The City Council will review the policy at their next work session. E. Air Quality WG Report. Chair Latham requested the work group to design where they would like to have the No Idling Signs installed at schools and only at Parks where there is known idling. The Edina Transportation Commission will need to review the proposed placement of signs. The City Council will review the purchasing and sign install during a future work session. 1. Centrum. The conversion of the three wood burning fire places to gas at the Centrum will be presented at the November 15th City Council meeting. 2. Drive Through City Code. The Planning Commission will review the ordinance at their December meeting. F. Recycling & Solid Waste WG 1. Refuse Report and ordinance. The first reading of the ordinance will occur at the November 15th City Council meeting. 2. City park recycling bin. The Park Board will review the EEC recommendation at their December 13th meeting. G. Turf Management Task Force. The Park Board will review the EEC recommendation at their December 13th meeting. H. Education Outreach WG. Commissioner Gubrud thanked everyone who participated in the Edina Day of Service. 1. Educational Program. Dr. Jonathan Foley from UMN will speak on April 19th at EHS auditorium. The EOWG to provide more details at the 1 -12 -12 EEC meeting. 2. Project Earth. Commissioner Jennings gave an update about the removal of Buckthorn at the High School. 3. Eco Film Festival. Chair Latham gave an update on how films are scheduled and staffed at the Metzold Amphitheater during the summer. Chair Latham will ask Tom Shirley about showing one or two environmental films on Thursdays during the summer. The EEC will continue to support the movie series at the Hennepin County Southdale Library that John Howard and Paul Thompson coordinate. I. Water Quality WG 1. Coal Tar ordinance. The first reading of the ordinance will occur at the November 15th City Council meeting. J. City Website. The City will be redesigning their website. K. EEC Website. The topic was tabled. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 1. Commission process discussion. Commissioner lyer lead a discussion on how the process of topics should be brought through each work group and then to the Commission for approval. Chair Latham gave an update about the Grand View Small Area Plan. Chair Latham reviewed the definition of term limits for a Commissioner. Chair Latham reviewed the Commissioner's attendance requirements. Commissioner Thompson promoted Alliance for Sustainability on November 15th at Roseville. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Jesse Struve. Sherry Engleman and Solvei Wilmot requested the Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group to hold a December meeting to review single sort recycling. 1. EEC Budget. Jesse Struve reported that as of 11 -10 -11 the remaining balance is $1500. Chair Latham requested that all commissioners submit any outstanding 2011 bills. Jesse Struve has been directed to prepay the ICLEI fee of $600 if there remains a surplus in the budget by December 15th. After ICLEI and staff time there'll be $878 remaining. The December 8th Energy and Environment Commission meeting has been cancelled. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Latham declared the meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Motion made by Member lyer and seconded by Member Gubrud to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator 'R y Y MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY. COUNCIL CHAMBERS DECEMBER 14, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Grabiel called the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Forrest, Scherer, Potts, Platteter, Cherkassky, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer, Grabiel Absent from the roll call was Commissioners Rock and Schroeder. ' III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of the December 14, 2011 meeting agenda. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Agenda approved. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Platteter moved approval of the November 9, 2011, meeting minutes. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS B -11 -13 Matthew and Stacy Bogart 6200 Belmore Lane A 128.&foot front yard setback variance Page 1 of 10 Planner Presentation i Planner Aaker informed the Commission.the subject property is located on the north side of Belmore Lane and adjacent to Interlachen Golf Club, The Property consists of a one and one half story home with an attached two car garage built in 1917. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing home and rebuild a new home on the property. The site is a 44,657 square foot lot. The existing home is located 28.7 feet from the front lot line. The new home will be built 71.58 feet from the front lot line. The applicant is seeking a front yard setback variance to allow the new- home to.be .built.farther back ,on the lot than the existing home. The front yard setback is established by averagingahe front yard,. setback of ' homes on either side of a property or if there is only one home adjacent, then the subject home must match the. .e: setback of the adjacent neighbor. In this instance, the only property affecting front yard setback is the home directly east of the subject property that provides a 200 foot front yard setback from Belmore Lane. Planner Aaker reported that the new home will be substantially larger than. the old home and will conform to all of the zoning ordinance requirements with the exception of the required front yard setback.. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning, Commission approve the variance based on the following findings:. 1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with the average front yard setback surrounding properties and will be two and one half times farther back from the front lot line than the existing home currently is. b. The imposed setback severely limits design opportunity. The unique circumstance is the original nonconforming placement of the home. Approval was also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Survey date stamped: November 23, 2011. Building plans/ elevations date stamped: Oct. 2, 2011. Page 2 of 10 i` Appearing for the Applicant Matthew and Stacy Bogart, property owners. Applicant Presentation Mr. Bogart told the Commission he was available to answer;questions. Public Comment Dennis Hogan, 6204 Belmore Lane, addressed, the, Commission and read his comments into the record (attached as Exhibit "X). Motion to close Public Hearing Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the `motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Mr. Bogart addressed the comments from Mr. Hogan. Mr. Bogart-explained when they began studying house design and placement they learned that the Sycamore tree on their property was not only an old tree; but also a very rare tree. To save the tree and to preserve views of the golf course for the Hogan property they centered their home on the lot. Mr. Bogart.reported that he worked with Mr. Hogan and his sister on house placement, etc. Mr. Bogart acknowledged they have children and that the proposed driveway is long. Mr. Bogart, added, he was willing to provide landscaping along the. common property line with the Hogan's to provide additional buffering, of the driveway. Concluding, Mr. Bogart noted that Mr. and Mrs. Hedblom property owners to the north were also present in support of the'project. Commissioners Forrest and Scherer expressed their opinion that the proposed driveway appeared too long and wide; albeit met code. Planner Aaker reported that the proposed driveway met code- in both setback and width. Aaker also pointed out driveways can be built right up to the property line; no setback. Commissioner Staunton acknowledged that Mr. Bogart was amenable to planting landscaping along the common property line; however, it's possible that additional buffering could actually block the view of the golf course from the Hogan property. Staunton asked Planner Aaker for clarification on the variance. Planner Aaker explained that the requested variance was to allow the new house to be built closer to the 'street than ordinance allows. In this instance the front yard setback for the subject lot is established by the front yard setback of the Hogan house. All Page.3 of 10 r other setback and lot coverage requirements are met. Planner Aaker concluded that the subject lot was'. large. Commissioner Fischer'commented that in this instance there is foundation for granting a variance, adding that he believes the plans as presented work well with the site. Fischer acknowledged the accommodations made by the applicant to accommodate the neighbor. Motion Commissioner Staunton: moved> variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest- acknowledged the work between the applicant and the Hogan's but-'pointed out the Hogan lot would be impacted by construction of a new house. - Continuing, Forrest said additional requirements could be placed as conditions of approval. Commissioner Staunton said in his opinion the variance as requested actually benefits the-adjacent Hogan property. Commissioner Carpenter said he agrees with the comment from Commissioner Staunton, adding that if the Commission feels strongly the Commission could add an additional condition of approval that would require the applicant to provide'additional landscaping along the common property line. The Commission could also suggest that the applicant and west neighbor (Hogan) work together on the landscaping plan Mr. Bogart addressed the Commission and reiterated he was very willing to commit to a landscaping buffer along theicommon property line with the Hogan's. Mr. Bogart said his commitment was to his property. A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging that the Bogart's and Hogan's had worked together on house placement and that the verbal commitment by Mr. Bogart to provide additional landscaping -on his property was sufficient. Chair Grabiel called for the vote; all voted aye; motion to approve a front yard setback variance carried. 2011.0013.11a Preliminary Plat Approval Newboy Addition Xcel Energy 7777 Washington Avenue South, Edina, Mld Page 4 of 10 �f Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Xcel Energy is requesting Preliminary and Final Plat for property located at 7777; 7801, 7807-and 78.15.Washington Avenue South. The proposed plat is unique, in that it is located in both Edina and Bloomington. There is only one lot located in the City of Edina. -(7777 Washington,Ave.) No nevv lot would be created with this plat, and lot located, in Edina lot would: not change, with the exception of a portion of the 7801 Washington Avenue South lot would be attached to it. In doing so, the parking lot and building at 7777 Washington would be located on the same lot. They currently are located on separate lots. The remaining 7807 and 7815 lots would be combined and reconfigured. The requested Plat would create a reconfigured lot in Bloomington, on which Xcel Energy could.,build a newelectric substation. (See page A8.) The applicant is working with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and City of Bloomington to obtain the necessary permits, approvals and platting to accommodate this request. Any approval in the City of Edina should be contingent on approval from the City of Bloomington. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of the Newboy Addition for Xcel Energy at 7777 Washington Avenue South based on the following findings: The existing property located within the City of Edina would not be impacted. The existing building and associated parking areas would now be located on the same lot. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. Final Plat approval by the City of Bloomington. 2. All necessary approvals must be obtained from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Appearing for the Applicant Chris Rogers, representing Xcel Energy Discussion Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Teague if Edina gains more land with the proposed reconfiguration of lots. Planner Teague responded if approved everything remains the same. Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Teague if the Park and Recreation easement Page 5 of 10 remains intact. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone would like to speak to the issue; being none; Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved preliminary plat approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Drive - Through Facilities Planner Teague informed the Commission that Julie Risser, member of the Energy and Environment Commission was present to address proposed changes to the zoning ordinance concerning drive - through windows. To summarize Teague said the proposed ordinance would prohibit drive - through facilities in the PCD -1 District, which was consistent with the recommendation of the Planning Commission in 2009. Teague said the ordinance changes would also add conditions to all drive - through facilities in all zoning districts; including setback requirements, non - idling signage, traffic impact study and air quality standards. Concluding, Teague noted that proposed condition K which addresses air quality standards would be hard to enforce if adopted. Julie Risser addressed the Commission and explained she was present on behalf of the Energy and Environment Commission. Risser presented to the Commission a draft of a Zoning Ordinance amendment regarding drive - through facilities in the City of Edina. Risser reported that Karwyn Kata (previous student member of the Planning Commission) did much of the research and writing of the proposed ordinance draft. Discussion Commissioner Potts asked Risser where the 300 -foot setback was established. Risser said that currently Edina's setback requirements for drive - through facilities was minimal, adding she believes the proposed 300 -foot setback would be measured from the window itself. Commissioner Scherer asked Risser how other cities polled address air quality standards. Risser responded most cities don't address this issue and if approved as recommended Edina would be on the cutting edge. Scherer asked Risser if she knows Page 6 of 10 how often air quality standards exceed a rating of 101. Risser responded that it does occur; but mostly during the months of July and August. Risser said at"this time the air quality standards are being reviewed. Commissioners raised the following issues with regard to air quality-standards: o Who issues an air quality alert — Risser: responded -the PCA issues, the alert. o Is the intent of the ordinance amendment to have the drive- through windows closed if an alert was issued; and if;so how, would that be enforced. ® Is issuing an alert site specific; could areas within Edina have different readings Commissioner Staunton commented that condition H. on non - idling "makes:sense; but wondered if there's confusion on this. He.asked Risser if any studies had been done on emissions from stopping and restarting vehicles. Risser said data supports turning off the vehicle; however, the signs would ask drivers to Ip ease turn off their vehicles as they wait. It's not mandatory they turn their vehicles off. A discussion ensued on if turning off ones vehicle actually was of benefit.. It was also pointed out that if the recommended signage asks, patrons to Ip ease turn of their vehicles as they wait; some will and some won't. Risser agreed that turning off the vehicle was voluntary; however she explained that the thought process behind the proposed signage was to educate drivers by making them aware of how long their vehicle idles as they wait at a drive - through; not to mention the -gas used. Commissioner Forrest asked Risser if the EEC ever conducted a study on headlight pollution. Riser said the EEC hasn't tackled light pollution; however it's a good idea. The Commission,questioned the reason a setback for a drive - through window from a residential property was established . Risser said an established setback from residential properties reduce noise pollution, control traffics flow and promotes walkability. The proposed ordinance amendment was to interface with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Risser said the EEC really wants to reduce noise from drive - through establishments. The Commission noted that the 300 7foot setback from the drive-through window was one point to measure distance; however, emissions and headlight pollution also impacts residential properties. Maybe reconsider where to establish the setback. The discussion returned to air quality with the Commission requesting that the following points be- reconsidered and reviewed by the EEC before the. Commission makes a decision on amending the current ordinance. The Commission asked Risser to further study the proposed ordinance bearing in mind the following: ® Air quality is monitored by the PCA which is regional. The issue than becomes what impact would strict enforcement of the 101 standard create for Edina business owners — would they have to close their "window" and if so how would Page 7 of 10 this impact Edina's businesses when businesses in Richfield, Minneapolis, etc. are not required to comply with the air quality standard.. • Clarify the intent of the "non - idling sign. • Create a map pinpointing an Edina drive-through 300 -foot setback scenario. How many ofrEdina's'drive- through facilities woul&be impacted by.-the 300 -foot setback: regardless of where it was taken., perimeter of the site or window. • Is.there science supporting turphlb, off the engine vs. idling. The .Commission expressed the opinion that,the 300 - foot distance was good; it made sense, but when, amending and - creating new ordinances it's. good, to know if the proposed, changes have ramifications. The Commission also questioned if in.this instance businesses with drive - through windows were notified that the.City was considering prohibiting or adding conditions too their operation.. Planner Teague said he agrees it would be fair to notify drive= through operators that an ordinance had been drafted. before the Council. holds the public hearing:, Continuing, Teague said another way to "handle" drive- through` windows could ,be through the Conditional Use Process. Chair Grabiel thanked'Risser for her work and the work of the EEC on the proposed ordinance, adding with all due respect that Risser and the EEC take another look at the proposed ordinance. Risser said she would do.,that and thanked the.Commission. A discussion ensued on:the most efficient way for the Commission to. discuss ordinance amendments and new ordinances. It was suggested when time.permits that the Commission go back to the "work session" format or have a two -part process before the Commission. Planner Teague agreed adding usually a topic was introduced and the discussion(s) followed. Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Revisions to Approved Site Plans Planner Teague reminded the Commission that the Planning Commission previously discussed this issue and as a result of the past discussions staff revised the Ordinance to address the concerns. Changes to the Ordinance were to Conditions #4 and #5.These changes were added to ensure1hat minor changes to site plan approvals do not include changes to any conditions required, including building material or color; and no changes may occur in the Heritage Preservation District. Page 8 of 10 1 Discussion Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify for him what the "one time" constitutes. Is there a time limit? Planner Teague clarified that the "one time" has an expiration date of 2 -years after final approval. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend Ordinance Amendment approval as modified. Commissioner Scherer seconded_ the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Utility & Mechanical 'Equipment Ordinance Planner Teague said the Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment on a number of occasions and the following changes have been added. 0 The size of the utility and mechanical equipment that must meet required setback has been reduced from 80 to 36 square feet. o Grouped equipment that exceeds 36 square feet must also meet the required setbacks. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked for clarification on if the 36 square feet refers to the footprint of the utility equipment. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Carpenter suggested that the reference to 36 square feet be modified`. to include the word footprint. Teague agreed with the suggested modification. Commissioner Forrest said another form of utility equipment to keep, in mind is the wind generator. Planner Teague agreed adding that wind generators are currently addressed by Ordinance. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Ordinance Amendment approval with the clarification that the 36 square feet refers to the footprint of the utility equipment. Commissioner Forrest'seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 9 of 10 VIII. COORESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel acknowledged receipt of the Council Connection. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Staunton .updated the Commission on the progress of the Grandview Small Area Plan Committee. Staunton said a draft of the "small area plan" can be found on the City's website. Staunton invited everyone to a public meeting the morning of January 7 h. Chair Grabiiel said another venue to get information. on what's happening in the City is Facebook on the City's website. X. STAFF COMMENTS None. XI: ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Potts moved meeting adjournment at 9:00 PM. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Backe &ogg gckey. Respectfully submitted Page 10 of 10 Comments of Dennis E. Hogan owner of 6204 Belmore Lane regarding the request for a setback Variance For a new home at 6200 Belmore Lane. Edina Planning Commision Meeting Dec, 14th 2011 To the Commission : The Hogan family built and has resided in our residence at 6204 Belmore Lane for the last 55 years. We originally acquired our property from the former owners of 6200 Belmore Lane Richard and Margaret Wilhoit. I support Matt and Stacy Bogart's request for a variance as presented with the following concerns : 1) In order to save the Sycamore tree near Belmore, the 4 car garage is positioned directly behind the new home and very close to the picture windows of our house. Also the new drive way to service this garage is very long and and runs very near to about half the length to our current (6204) home. This is a,concern because the Bogarts have children ranging in age from about 15 to the age of 8. It is almost certain to result in substantial amount of car and /or motorcycle traffic for the next 15 years. If there is a way to mitigate this possible problem it would be deeply appreciated. 2) The reason the Bogarts located the garage where it is, is an attempt to accommodate our Family's desire to at least partially preserve a small view of Interlachen golf course. We would prefer this arrangement over the closer setback (which would block this view) . But we are wondering if there is any way to locate the garage closer to Belmore, shorten the driveway, preserve the Sycamore and maintain the view ? I am not a architect but I feel there must be a way to do this. Thank you very much for your.consideration. We look forward to welcoming Matt and Stacy Bogart and their family as our new neighbors. MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall.— Council Chambers December 13, 2011 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:05 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chairman Ste gner,.and Members Anger, Davis, Moore,, Rehkamp Larson, Schwartzbauer, Copman and Ellingboe: Absent were Members Carr, Curran and Ahlstrom. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. . III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Davismoved to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Member Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Regular meeting of November 7, 2011 Member Schwartzbauer moved approval of the minutes from the November 7, 2011 meeting of the board. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Certificate of Appropriateness #H -11 -9 4907 Arden Avenue Request: A new front entry canopy Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4900 block of Arden Avenue. The existing home, a Mediterranean /Spanish Colonial style, was constructed in 1925. The Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) request is for the addition of a new protected front entry canopy. The proposed 55 square foot front entry canopy requires a COA because it is a structural change to the street facing facade of the home. The stoop is shown to be 9 feet wide and projects 4' 11" from the house - 6' including the steps. The new canopy is designed to not only provide protection at the front entry, but also correct a flat front facade with an entry door and sidelights that are not in proportion to each other. The design provides a hip -roof clad in clay tiles, stucco posts supporting the arched front and side openings, and wrought iron railings, all complimenting the Mediterranean architectural style of the home. Consultant Vogel reviewed the plans and observed that the new work was compatible with the size, scale, building materials, and architectural character of the historic house. Furthermore, no significant historic architectural features will be removed or destroyed, and the new additions and exterior alterations should not impair the historic significance or integrity of nearby historic homes. If Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 13, 2011 Planner Repya concluded that Staff recommends approval of the plans for the front entry canopy. Findings supporting the recommendation include: • The front entry canopy will compliment the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate_ of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Plan of Treatment and Zoning Ordinance. Approval is conditioned on the plans presented. Board members briefly discussed the proposed plan receiving clarification on several design elements. Member Davis then moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new front entry portico as proposed. Member Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. 'The motion carried. B. Certificate of Appropriateness #H -11 -9 4511'Bruce Avenue Request: A new detached garage in the rear yard and an addition to the rear and south side of the home Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the.east side of the 4500 block of Bruce Avenue. The existing home, an Italian Renaissance Revival style, was constructed in 1924 and currently has a 2 -car detached garage accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property which is setback 20 feet from the rear property line. The Certificate of Appropriateness request is two -fold. The first component of the plan entails the construction of a new detached garage in the northeast corner of the rear yard. The second element includes a 459 square foot two -story addition to the rear and south side of the home. The plans for the garage call for demolition of an existing 380 sq. ft. (19'x 20') detached garage situated in the northeast corner,of the rear yard.4.5 feet from the side lot line and 20 feet from the rear lot line. A proposed 576 square foot garage will be constructed continuing the 4.5 foot setback,from the side lot line; however the rear setback will be reduced to 4.5 feet to provide an additional 15.5 feet of livability to the rear, yard. A new curb cut will not be required since the proposed garage will be accessed by the existing driveway. Ms. Repya pointed out that the design of the,proposed garage compliments the Italian Renaissance Revival architectural style of the home with a 12/4 hip roof, asphalt shingles, stucco clad walls with brick wainscot, and frieze board with dental molding. Two 9' x 8' cedar overhead doors are proposed for the front /west elevation and a single 7' x 8' cedar overhead door is proposed for the south elevation. The height 'of 'the hipped roof is shown to be 13.5 feet at the highest peak which meets the height standard required for new garages in the district. Attention to detail with wainscoting and windows and /or doors is demonstrated on the west and south elevations. The north and east elevations do not show similar architectural detailing because they directly abut 6' high privacy fences. Addressing a 2 foot reduction in grade from the house to the rear lot line, the plans also include a 2 foot retaining wall along the entire rear /east lot line to flatten out the remaining yard area and control overall drainage. Ms. Repya further explained that the plans for the two -story addition demonstrate that a footprint of 459 square feet, or an additional 918 square feet of living space be added to the rear /east and side /south elevations Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 13, 2011 of the home. The addition will extend 9 feet 3 inches to the south side and 12 feet from the rear of the home. The addition is shown to be set back 6 feet from the north wall of the home, thus not visible from the front street on the north end of the property; however the addition will be visible from the street on the south end of the property.. The addition is shown to be setback 11.25 feet from the front /west wall of the home, and opens up to a small patio in the southwest corner. The brick chimney on the south elevation will be demolished and replaced with a new stucco chimney located slightly west on the elevation to accommodate the addition. The original hip roof and flat roofs of the previous additions will be replaced with two hip roofs. A "monitor" or "Cupola" is proposed in the area of the roof system where the hip roofs'intersect and is provided to add natural light to the upper stair and hallway area. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel reviewed plans for the proposed garage and addition to the home and determined that the subject house is not individually eligible for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark but it does contribute to the historic significance of the district as a whole and is therefore worthy of preservation. The plans submitted depict a two -story structural addition on the south side that appears to be compatible with the original structure and should not destroy or obscure any important historic character defining features. Furthermore, the addition does not appear to drastically change the scale and character of the historic home. Addressing the proposed rooftop cupola, Mr. Vogel observed that such architectural embellishments were historically seen on Greek Revival and Italianate styled houses, which pre -date development in the Country Club District by 50 -100 years. Mr. Vogel added that the cupola would be out of context with the surrounding homes in the Country Club District. The plans for construction of a new garage that will match the architectural character of the house, meets the criteria set out in the Plan of Treatment for new detached structures, and -should not visually detract from the property's historic character Mr. Vogel concluded that the addition, new garage, and minor exterior alterations (excluding the cupola) should not have an adverse effect on the historic character and integrity of the historic house or the neighborhood. The proposed work appears to preserve the property's distinctive architectural characteristics while adding more living space and enhancing the, Mediterranean flavor of the primary fagade. Vogel recommended approval of the new-detached garage as proposed and the addition without the rooftop cupola. Planner Repya pointed out that Staff concurred with Mr. Vogel's evaluation of the new garage and two -story addition and recommended approval of the garage as proposed, and the addition without the rooftop cupola. Findings supporting the recommendation include: The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. The proposed garage and addition appear compatible with the architectural character of the house and will not visually detract from the property's historic character with the exception of the rooftop cupola Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 13, 2011 ,which is not contextual with the other homes in the Country Club District. The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Member Rehkamp Larson commented that the composition of the facades for the proposed work is nice, and while she liked the cupola from an architectural standpoint, it would not fit into the architectural context of the Country Club District homes, and to approvesuch an element,could set a dangerous precedence in the District. Ms. Rehkamp Larson also pointed out that the roof plan does not appear to be complete, and the windows on the second story of the front facade while appearing the same; are actually awning and casement windows, -which when opened will look very different. Member Moore stated that he liked the plans for both the garage and the addition, with.the exception, of the cupola which sticks out and appears out of place. Member Anger agreed that the plans were quite attractive, however questioned the impact the cupola would have on the integrity of the neighborhood. Member Davis questioned the height of the cupola relative to the neighboring homes. He observed that when he initially reviewed the plans for the addition, he wasn't sure the Idesign fit within the Country Club,District, however as he analyzed them more closely, he came to conclusion that the plans were very attractive and he would be able to support the request. Member Stegner stated that heaoo liked the plans; however the proposed rooftop cupola does not appear consistent with the architecture in the Country Club District. He added that considering a strong'.' r recommendation from Consultant Vogel that the cupola not be included, he would not be able to;support that portion of the plan. Eric J. Hansen, AIA, Architect for the homeowners addressed the plan and had the following responses to questions raised by the Board: • The proposed rooftop cupola is a functional architectural detail that has been around for centuries, designed to let natural light into the upper stair /hallway area and to accommodate the various intersections of hip roofs from the old to the new. Also, the height of the proposed cupola is close to the same as the ridgeline of the home to the north - it's shown to be slightly taller than the home to the south. • The.windows on the front facade /second story are proposed as casement and awning style to fulfill the building code requirement of providing egress in the bedroom area. Homeowner, Andy Matysik explained to the Board that this is his boyhood home where he and his wife are focused on ensuring that their plans are consistent with the historic integrity of the surrounding properties and the District at large. He added that when he first viewed the cupola element, he.questioned it too. However, overtime, he has grown to like that feature. That being said, he added that if the Board decided to delete the cupola from the approved plan, he would be agreeable to that decision. A brief discussion ensued amongst the Board. Member Schwartzba•uer then moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new detached garage and addition to the home subject to the conditions recommended by Staff to include: 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 13, 2011 • The plans presented, with the exception of -the rooftop cupola which should be removed. • The placement of a year built plaque on the exterior of the detached garage. Member Moore seconded the motion. A brief discussion ensued regarding the types of windows proposed for the front facade. Member Rehkamp Larson commented that she did not want to amend the motion to require consistent windows on the front fagade; however she strongly recommended consideration of her concerns. Chairman Stegner called the question. Members Schwartzbauer, Moore, Anger, Rehkamp Larson, and Stegner voted aye. Member Davis voted nay. The motion carried. C. 2011 Year in Review Planner Repya reported on the Board's accomplishments over the past year. She pointed out that the following items were provided to the Minnesota Historical Society in an annual report as.a requirement for Certified Local Government participation: • Morningside Bungalow Study — Final revisions to neighborhood bulletin. • Preliminary Discussion of Heritage Award Nomination Process - Advertise " • New Fiscal Year — Annual Meeting in March • Orientation of New Board Members • Election of Officers • Review of Possible Award Nominations • City of Edina Recognition Event - March 21n, Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion • Goal Setting for the Year Approval of Heritage Award Winner — St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, 4439 W. 50th Street • Plan Preservation Month Recognition Activities • Proclamation "May —Preservation Month ", — May 3`d • Joint Activity with Edina Historical Society: Open House — Cahill School & Grange Hall — May 101h • Work Session with City Council — May 17th, 5:00 p.m. • Presentatiorrof Award to St. Stephen's Episcopal Church • Southdale Center artifacts discussion - subcommittee appointed • White Oaks Neighborhood walking tour • History of Massing in Edina — Report from Planner Cary Teague, 9 Concept of conservation districts vs. landmark designations discussed • Executive Summary of Thematic Study for Heritage Resources Associated with Edina Women report received • MN Historic Preservation Conference - September 22 -23 report from attendees • Review inventories of historic resources — appointed subcommittee .to create an electronic database Additionally, the Board reviewed nine Certificates of Appropriateness for homes in the historic Country Club District. 5 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 13, 2011 Chair Stegner thanked Ms. Repya for the report. He then shared the ways in which each board member participated in the•work of the HPB over the past year. The information provided was a testimony to the boards' commitment to heritage preservation in the community. D. Planning Ahead — Future Projects Planner Repya provided the Board with the following materials in preparation for evaluating the 2012 work plan at their next meeting on January 10, 2012: • A list of potential work items for 2012 • Comprehensive Plan's long range goals, benchmarks and policies • 2012 Work Plan calendar Ms. Repya asked the Board to review the information provided, and before the January 2012 meeting, evaluate how the work items listed should be scheduled on the calendar for the year. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - An email received on 12/06/11 from Jamie Heidt expressing interest in the history of Southdale VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS X Edina Historical Society Membership Member Moore reported that after agreeing to join the Edina Historical Society to fulfill the Certified Local Government's requirement that at least one HPB member belong to the EHS; he has now been appointed to the Historical Society's. Board of Directors. Mr. Moore's fellow. HPB members thanked him for representing the HPB at the Historical Society and agreed that the common tie will be beneficial to both the. HPB and the EHS. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Movie from 1930's highlighting the construction of St. Stephen's Episcopal. Church The movie highlighting the construction of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church was aired at the end of the meeting. The Board agreed that the movie, highlighting the '2011 Heritage Award winner was an excellent way to close out the preservation year.... looking forward to a productive 2012: X. NEXT MEETING DATE January 10,,2012 XI. ADJOURNMENT 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 1 0 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 13, 2011 7:01 PM L CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm II. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Steel, Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Segreto, Neville, Weicht IIL APPROVAL OFMEETINGAGENDA Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Lough, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Steel, Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Segreto Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by- Member Deeds approving -the consent agenda as — - follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes —Regular Meeting of Monday, November 7, 2011 Ayes: Steel, Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Segreto Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VIA. Edina Park Recycling Bin Recommendations - Dianne Plunkett Latham, Edina Energy, & Environment Commission Dianne Plunkett Latham, Chair of the Edina Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) gave a presentation to the Park Board on having recycling bins in the parks. She explained that both Mr. . Keprios and she feel that there is still more work to be done before a recommendation can be made and therefore feeNhat a Task Force would be a good way to do that with people who specialize in recycling. Ms. Latham suggested that the Task Force consist of the four members from the Recycling Solid Waste Working group, Vince Cockriel, Solvei Wilmot, Tom Shirley, and herself as well as any Park Board members who would be interested in serving. She pointed out that once the Task Force is set up they will evaluate what the best way is to get the recycling bins in the parks. Mr. Keprios commented that staff is in support of expanding the recycling program and feels it would make the most sense to have the Task Force report directly to the EEC and continue to do so until they have formed a plan of action and then forward that to the Park Board. Member Deeds asked if there is any impact on the operating budget on the recycling bins in terms of Park and Recreation. Mr. Cockriel replied it has been a little bit of extra work but once it gets into__ motion he thinks it will depend on the recycling contractor and how picky they are regarding contaminants. Ms. Latham added that the technology at the material- recycling facilities has improved significantly over the years and therefore she doesn't envision there being a problem. 1 VI.B. Revised Turf Management Plan — Dianne Plunkett Latham, Edina Energy & Environment Commission Ms. Latham informed the Park Board that since the September 13, 2011 meeting Ms. Paterlini . and herself met with Mr. MacHolda because there were some errors on how some of the athletic fields were categorized. Ms. Latham went through those changes.. Ms. Paterlini informed the committee that typically when a field is sprayed it says to stay off of it for, three days and the EEC is proposing to change that to seven days. Also, some boulevards were added where children seemed to play quite a bit. A summary of those changes were given to the Park Board. Member Meyer indicated that he thinks there should be some kind of a recovery plan if something were to get out of whack; staff would have the consent to fix it because`if staff had to go through a.certain chain of commands they could lose days and all of a sudden there would be a huge mess that could cost thousands of dollars to fix _He noted if there was an aberration because of-weather or something else and weeds totally takeover an_.area there should be a recovery plan so that they can react versus coming to boards to get approval: Ms. Latham replied there shouldn't be a problem and she would rather change the policy if a situation like that happene&a6d something needed to be sprayed. She stated it's pretty balanced right now and if they, look at it every couple of years she thinks they can keep it balanced. Mr. Keprios. asked Member Meyer when he says he thinks they should consider a recovery plan is he suggesting the use of pesticides, at -that point for;recovery or is he suggesting to re -turf the. areas. -- - --- Me n ber- Meyerresponded tliatwhat he sayingis -he doesn'twantto build a system that is-'so rigid that they.are short of fields or they destroy scenic areas because they can't,respond to what is going on. Member Deeds asked if someone will oversee it on a quarterly or at a minimum on an annual basis whether it is working or not so that probably won't happen. He stated that he thinks in order to get at the issues that are being raised.,there should,be a regular discussion around some of the designated areas whether it's working or not and whether some areas are out of control. He added that it,could also be that some areas_a.re working so well they could move them from B to OC. He indicated that since it's a learning process there should be a review process. Ms. Latham asked Member Deeds how often he would recommend to which Mr. Deeds replied he would ask Mr. Cockriel his thoughts. Mr. Cockriel replied that the plan itself states they can expect a minimum of three years for organics to actually start working where they get integrated into the system enough where they are doing something so to review it before then probably doesn't make any sense. Member Deeds asked if during the summer of. :2013 would be a good time to look at it to' which Mr. Cockriel replied that the best time to see what is working and what is not working is shortly: after the spring bloom of weeds. Member Lough asked if it would be possible to construct some sort of emergency response plan that may not have to be reviewed and approved beforehand but would require approval, so to speak, after the fact. He explained that way if something were to happen like that then higher authorities can look at it and understand the reasoning that was used. Ms. Latham indicated that is the problem to have requisite transparency versus the ability to do it. She stated that many parents want to know what is happening with a particular field and they need to have something with transparency and approval. Ms. Paterlini asked what would constitute an emergency and "asked Mr. Cockriel how many emergencies he has seen to which Mr. Cockriel replied that to him none of them are emergencies. Ms. Paterlini commented "that it seems to defy the purpose of any policy that can be invalidated every time they see a dandelion. Member Deeds responded he doesn't believe it would be invalidated every time they see a dandelion but he does believe things can get out of balance due to weather where they could lose a large area of land that they would need to clear out and re -sod. Ms. Latham stated maybe they need to have annual reviews. 2 l Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that both Mr. Cockriel and he do not support the recommendation of staying off the grass for seven days after being sprayed. He explained that they have been required by law and continue to do. notifications as required by the federal government and the state government as is labeled on every product that their trained, professional park maintenance people use; none of which 'state to stay off for seven days. Ms. Latham,asked Ms. Paterlini if she thought they could live with whatever state law requires to which Ms. Paterlini replied yes. Member Steel added if parents choose to keep their kids off longer they can see the posted dates of application and can make their own decision. Ms. Paterlini pointed out that their first intent is trying to make people" h ave chemical awareness and there are lots of substances around. Member Deeds suggested a page be put on the city website that simply states when the parks were sprayed and what was sprayed., Mr. Cockriel replied that there are so many factors with weather conditions that go into spraying that it would require a lot of data entry that would not have very accurate information. 'Mr. Cockriel indicated that a notice ahead of time on the website that says these Are the fields that are - sprayed on a yearly basis and typically the spray time is between May 15 and June 15. He added they could also list the products and their websites that are used so people can look them up. Member Steel stated a press release in the spring would be a good vehicle for educating people. Mr. Keprios noted that he agrees they need to devote some space to educate the public about the turf management plan and that signage will be the instant information to educate people; however, he thinks it-might be confusing- if they - start -p lacing signs that- say -they don't -spray in-certain- areas because then - people will assume that we spray every place that does not have a sign. Therefore, he would not like to go down that road which is a part of the recommendation that the Task Force can debate and come up with some recommendations. Ms. Latham stated she is only in favor of where they are actually spraying. She added.that may result in a lot of extra effort and maybe they should strike it. Mr. Cockriel stated they should also put on the website that they never spray within 30 feet of playground areas. Member Deeds suggested putting a map on the website with the designations of what is being sprayed where. Ms. Latham commented that she has talked to Rebecca Foster, GIS Administrator, about.putting together a map like that through the city's GIS system. Mr. Cockriel responded it would be a very confusing map if they GIS every little spot because some parks have areas that are not sprayed. He not that he also talked to Ms. Foster and she said it would be a handful to take each park and break it into a half dozen different categories. Ms. Latham asked so it is doable, it would just take a lot of time, effort and money to which Mr. Cockriel replied correct. Ms. Latham asked with those two corrections that they made she will bring this to the EEC and if no further corrections are made they will recommend that it.go to City Council. VI. C. Edina Senior Center — Bill Lough, Edina Park Board Member Lough indicated that Ms. Weigle gave a good presentation of the Senior Center at last month's meeting. He noted that 'She also did a good job of outlining some of the challenges that the Senior Center experiences in trying to conduct its operations. He informed the Park Board that for 2011 the Senior Center is budgeted to lose approximately $90,000 and add to that the salary and benefits of a full- time director and an additional $20;000 which is cross charged to Hennepin County each year and a depreciation estimate of $100,000. He pointed out as a Park Board they were pretty interested'in enterprise facilities that were losing approximately $100,000 and were quite concerned about how they might improve the operations.. Therefore, he thinks that if the same rules apply to the Senior Center they should take an interest in exactly what they have there. 3 Member Lough informed the Park Board that he feels the real issue is revenues and thinks the lack of revenue is really coming from underutilization of the building itself. Member Lough went through the usage of the various classrooms and facilities within the Senior Center. He stated that the building itself does not have a high occupancy rate and so he thinks they are not getting revenues to cover the costs of running the building. He added that it is also his understanding that programming outside of the building is also losing money; however, he does not think that is the biggest issue in terms of the revenues. Member Lough pointed out that the challenge to this is the parking issue. He noted that programming at the Senior Center has been scheduled during times so as to not create conflicts with the library or with people who are trying to overlap and use the Senior Center itself. He stated that he thinks revenue utilization is something they should be concerned about regardless of parking. Member Lough added that he has also advocated opening the Senior Center or parts of the Senior Center during the evening at times over the years and thinks cost is usually raised as an issue. Member Lough pointed out that he has heard from a number of sources that it is hard to find meeting space in this town and that if you need to hold a meeting you have to ask for it well ahead of time. He noted that it would seem to him that the Senior Center along with other buildings might be a possible source of use to increase or to optimize the meeting space in this town. He stated there may even be other programs using the space for revenue; it doesn't have to be senior programming. He commented maybe they explore synergies by meshing with other groups in the community to better utilize the facility. Member Jacobson indicated that she also remembers Ms. Weigle mention that she didn't want to add additional programming because they would need additional staff. She stated she would be curious to find out how much staff they would need to support the cost. Member Meyer asked are there options to fix the parking issue. Mr. Keprios responded they have been working with the new management, who has taken over the office building, regarding access to their ramp. He noted that if worse comes to worse they could convert what is left of Grandview Square Park and convert it to asphalt and make it a parking lot. He stated it is a big issue and a tough problem because we want to be good neighbors with the library and the office tenants and condominium tenants. It's a team effort and they don't want to consider themselves in competition with the library and all of a sudden disregard their need for parking. Member Jones indicated that there is on -road parking spaces on Grandview Square Park marked for Grandview residents and guests only. She noted that she would like to see what type of agreement the city has with them that give them permission to park on the road and have it be exclusive for their use. Member Deeds indicated that even given parking constraints it seems that they are way underperforming and it would probably be worth having someone take a look at utilization as well as what else could be put there. Member Meyer commented that staffing costs should not be the reason that a meeting room is not being provided for a professional group who are Edina citizens, it's a city resource. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Lough, in order to get a better understanding of the parking situation at the Senior Center as well as to inform the Grandview Small Area Planning Committee for potential improvements to this site for both the short and long term the Park Board requests that the City Council directs staff to examine the parking situation 4 adjacent to the Senior Center Hennepin County Library building and report back to the Park Board at its January meeting. The report should answer the following questions: How many additional parking spaces would be needed to allow the city to more fully utilize the Senior Center and what is the contractual agreement with Grandview Condominiums and office buildings for the 22 on- street parking spots across from the Senior Center that are currently restricted and the contractual relationship, if any of the ramp across the street from the Senior Center. Mr. Keprios asked Member Jones if he heard correctly, that she is requesting staff to have, a report ready by the January City Council meeting. Member Jones replied not the January City Council meeting but the January Park Board meeting. She explained the reason for January is because the Grandview Commons meeting is right around that time and she would like to be able to tell the consultants what they feel they need in terms of net parking spaces: Mr. Keprios replied because staff s plate is so full right now that he would be able to come up with something very brief but would not be able to get an in depth study done in that time frame. Member Meyer asked shouldn't they be involving somebody else in this such as the Planning Commission or Transportation Commission. He suggested maybe the answer is a summary that comes in January with a synopsis of what they are able to do so far and shoot for a full report come February or March. He also pointed out that the fact Grandview is marking city street parking spaces as being their own also raises some issues. - - - -- -Member Deeds stated -that he also thinks it's important to see what-can be done within the constraints that exist that are not currently being.done. Member Segreto asked what the contractual agreement is that gives the townhouses the right to park on a City street. Mr. Keprios replied he will look into it and get that information. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that if there are agenda items, such as this, they would like placed on the agenda it would be nice to have those specific ideas far enough in advance so that staff can do the adequate research and be better prepared to answer more intelligently so that Park Board can have the right information to make informed decisions. Member Steel.asked Mr. Keprios if he would be able to provide Member Jones with some concrete evidence showing they really need this. Mr. Keprios replied that he will meet with Ms. Weigle and they will come up with the number of parking stalls that they feel they are currently lacking. He added they will go back into the records and find what it is that Ms. Weigle,and he recommended at the time of the design but obviously did not happen. Member Jones stated that for the record she recently counted`the parking spaces and there are 138 on and off road parking spaces.near the building. There are 100 off road and 38 on -road spaces. She pointed out that with the capacity of around 300. for the Senior Center and the equal footprint for the library 138 spaces is not adequate. Ayes: Lough, Jones, Meyers, Steel Nays: Fronek, Segreto, Deeds, Jacobson Motion failed VI.D. Work Plan — Keeya Steel, Vice Chair Edina Park Board Member Steel indicated that given the amount of work Park Board is doing and the different topics they are covering as well as annual items she suggested the Park Board should come up with some kind of Work Plan. Mr. Keprios responded that he thinks he can put together a pretty good work plan in time for the January meeting for the Park Board to consider and discuss. . 5 Member Steel indicated that she thinks it will be helpful to include working groups as well. Member Deeds noted that the sports dome study should be ready for the February 14`h Park Board meeting. Member Meyer commented that it seems like there is getting to.be a capacity of issues and suggested they may want to look at having a couple of extended workshops. He indicated they are starting.to get into a. lot of things, although he thinks temporarily, but the volume they are trying to accomplish may not fit the meeting schedule. Member Fronek suggested when they review the enterprise facilities it can get to be a bit too much and suggested spreading those out over the year. Member Fronek'noted he would recommend that the Senior Center be put on the work plan for next year. Member Steel suggested they correlate that with Edinborough Park because they are based on and serviced on kind of similar discussions. VIE. Donations Policy & Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy Working Group Update: - Ellen Jones, Edina Park Board Member Jones informed the Park Board that they have completed the naming policy and procedure recommendation; however they are. not going to take a final vote until they finish the donation policy and procedure. VI.F User Fees Policy Working Group U P date— Ke e a Steel, Vice Chair Edina P a rk Board _ Member Steel informed the Park Board they have received a lot of information and at their meeting tomorrow they will be focusing on costs and fee structures of the athletic associations. She noted that coming up they will be discussing what it means to be a priority user association and what kind of services those associations receive. She added that she is putting together a document outlining -the information they have received because she thinks it will be educational for the Park Board and City Council as they move along. VI. G. Grandview Plan Update — Ellen Jones, Edina Park Board Member Jones informed the Park Board the Grandview Plan is moving along and on December 20`h a draft will be presented to the City Council and on January 7`h the Steering Committee will meet and come up with recommendations that they feel are capable of being presented to the boards. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Fronek stated that he would formally like to recognize Ed MacHolda and his service to the . City; it's a big loss to the City. He stated on behalf of the Park Board he would like to extend a thanks and gratitude for his service. IX 'STAFF COMMENTS ' IX.A. 2012 Park Board Meeting Calendar. — Mr. Keprios pointed out to the Park Board that the only meeting not being held on the second Tuesday of the month this year will be the August meeting. He noted that due to the primary election the Park Board meeting will be held on Monday, August 13`h. Mr. Keprios introduced and informed the Park Board that Ann Kattreh is now the Park and Recreation Assistant Director. He indicated that he appreciates Member Fronek's comments on Ed MacHolda and C: that staff misses him and is saddened that he voluntarily resigned and chose to move onto something else. They wish him the very best. Mr. Keprios handed out the following Staff Updates. Work Session Meeting Notice: • The Park Board is asked to attend a Joint Work Session with the City Council.on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. in the Community Room to hear the Edinborough Park consultant's study results and recommendations. Staff Updates: 1. The general skating.rink at Countryside Park is being flooded and maintained for this year's skating season. The warming house will be open and will have a Warming House Attendant on duty throughout the outdoor skating season. 2. Last week the City of Minneapolis staff approached me and the Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of St. Louis Park to re -open the discussion of using the City of Minneapolis Water Works Department property at 40`h and France as an off- -leash dog park. 3. The Edina Soccer Association has offered to donate funds to convert the softball field at Highlands Park into a soccer field. It would involve removing the backstop at Highlands Park, plant grass or place sod in the softball field infield area and install irrigation. 4. The Lacrosse Association is requesting that the baseball field at Wooddale Park be converted to a lacrosse field. 5. At the December 6, 2011 City Council meeting, former Edina Park Director Bob Kojetin handed out the attached letter dated December 4, 20 1.1 and he also handed out the attached "Oral History" done by Bob Kojetin. 6. The Edina Hockey Alumni Association will be giving the Park Board a presentation at a future Park Board meeting regarding a $4 million addition to Braemar Arena to build locker rooms for boys and girls Edina Varsity and Junior Varsity hockey teams on the main floor and a dry-land training facility on the second level which will be run by a private organization. 7. The Edina Aquatic Center Flowrider amenity is under construction. 8. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. has been hired to further analyze the proposed phase one - development of the Countryside Park master plan. X. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:50 7 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE EDINA CITY HALL ' DECEMBER 1, 2011 4:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL: Answering roll call were Bernice Amacher, Pat Beaver, Naomi Griffith, Chip Jones, Amy Kerber, Mark Lidke, Barbara La Valleur, Bill McCabe, Lois Ring, Ruth Valgemae. Staff Present: Michael Frey, Anne Spooner. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA: Motion made by Mr. McCabe and seconded by Ms. Valgemae to approve the meeting agenda. AYES: Amacher, Beaver, Griffith, Jones, Kerber, Lidke, La Valleur, McCabe, Ring, Valgemae. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA: No additions to the agenda. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT: No members present. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Financial Report/New Donations CITY BALANCE (UTILITY BILL PAYMENTS APPLIED THROUGH 11/30/11) TOTAL REVENUES 52,980.93 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 631646.32 EXPENDITURES OVER REVENUES - 10,665.39 2011 2011 BUDGET 2011 7,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2011 6,317.10 SUPPLIES 2011 287.92 CITY BALANCE 2011. .894.98 EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 377.00 TOTAL : 1,271.98 Mr. McCabe reported that the city balance does not carry forward and Ms. Ring suggested that these funds be applied to expenditures. Motion made by Mr. Jones and seconded by Ms. Beaver to use the city balance of $894.98 for payment toward the purchase of 30 new Public Art Books for placement at EAC. AYES: Amacher, Beaver, Griffith, Jones, Kerber, Lidke, La Valleur, McCabe, Ring, Valgemae. Motion carried. B. Design Updates: Map Card and Call for Artists Committee members will send map card changes to Michael Frey who will communicate these changes to Kaylin Martin. Ms. La Valleur and Mr. Lidke began revisions on the Call for Sculptors invitation and will be ready once funding is approved on December 20. A separate meeting will be set up soon to finalize the Call for Sculptors. C. SOth and France /Sculpture Exhibition Ms. Kerber reported that Mr. Lidke and Mr. Jones met with Rachel Hubbard of the 50th & France Business Association about placement of sculptures. Ms. Ring reported that there is concrete under the pavers at 50th and France so sculptures can be securely anchored. The association has agreed to pay for three artist's stipends. The selection process will include Rachel Hubbard and others from the association. They will choose three locations for the sculptures and will notify EPAC of their selections. Ms. Ring remarked that these locations will need to be added to the site list. D. Website Improvements Mr. Frey reported that the City of Edina will have a new website as of December 31. Current information will be transferred over to the new website. He recommended that it is better to purge it now, making for an easier transition. Suggestions and comments should be sent to Mr. Frey who will communicate them to Jennifer Bennerotte. Mr. Frey, Ms. Ring and Ms. Griffith have a scheduled meeting on December 7th at 10 a.m. to discuss the EPAC pages on the website. EPAC members are invited. E. Public Art Book Update /City Hall Book Update Ms. La Valleur presented a proof of the new Public Art Book she has been hard at work on. Final changes were made and the book is near completion. Each book will be sold through EAC for approximately $35 and the proceeds will benefit EPAC. Ms. Valgemae continues revisions of the EPAC book at City Hall. She commented that this book contains the entire history of EPAC and includes thorough written information along with many pictures documenting EPAC's activities. F. Proposal for Funding for 2012 The EPAC funding will be determined at the December 20 City Council meeting. G. Legacy Fund Mr. McCabe reported that there were questions raised regarding EPAC's eligibility. Mr. McCabe will report back with a final determination. H. Lighting of Sculptures Ms. Ring reported to Tom Shirley that the Gyr Family Cycle solar light was burnt out and needs to be replaced. (.Other A. Holy Big Bird Ms Ring reported that information was sent by e-mail about a possible interest in the purchase of Holy Big Bird. Ms. Ring will follow up on this and provide an update. B. Lady Diva Ms. Ring asked the committee if Lady Diva could stay another year. It is a sculpture that was shipped from out of state and is difficult to install. Ms. Kerber mentioned that we typically do not invite sculptors who did not receive many votes to remain. Another suggestion was to place it at 50th and France where it would be more fitting. More discussion to follow. Mr. McCabe reported the December 15 EAC Board meeting will be held in Edina City Council Chambers beginning at 4:30 and will be televised on Channel 16..EPAC is invited to attend. Ms. Ring will be reporting on behalf of EPAC. ADJOURNMENT: 5:15 p.m. ■ Conducted the annual Together We Stand Campaign. Partnered with schools, BER Police Chiefs, faith communities and other community organizations to deliver key campaign messages: "Celebrate without Alcohol" and "Graduate without Alcohol." ■ Twenty -two area hotels and motels joined Together We Stand efforts for the first time this year. Their participation expanded the campaign's influence in the community to deter underage drinking. ■ Designed and distributed a brochure with guidelines for deterring underage drinking in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield hotels and motels. • Passed a social host ordinance in Bloomington on August 15, 2011. Developed and implemented a communication plan to inform the community about the ordinance and create greater awareness about the underage drinking issue. • Provided two parent workshops in Edina on the topics of adolescent brain development and positive parenting. Over one hundred fifty parents participated. • Provided two positive parenting workshops for Spanish- speaking parent groups in Bloomington and Richfield. Thirty parents participated. • Supervised several Bloomington Youth Action Crew (BYAC) projects to prevent underage drinking. BYAC produced two public service announcements on underage drinking prevention, created and distributed underage drinking prevention posters, facilitated a retreat with youth and adults and developed and distributed a brochure called "Adults We Have Something to Say" to promote the importance of caring adults. BYAC received the "Outstanding Youth Group of the Year" award at the statewide Shutting Off the Tap to Teens conference for their work. ■ Conducted the Bloomington Community Readiness Survey to gather residents' opinions on alcohol, tobacco and other drug use. ■ Completed a bi- annual evaluation of Tri -City Partners Coalition steering committee members. The evaluation rated the coalition on aspects related to planning, implementation, leadership, local and statewide involvement, communication, participation, progress and outcomes. ■ Evaluated feedback from forums and events held in the community. ■ Evaluated how Bloomington High School students used the Bloomington Youth Action Crew map and their impressions /response to the underage drinking prevention public service announcements. Now Tri -City Partners Coalition is funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and the Sober Truth On Preventing Underage Drinking (STOP) grant. For more information, contact us at 952- 563 -8984 or www.tricitypartners.org. • Working together, we continue to accomplish a great deal. Try -City Partners Coalition for Healthy Youth and Communities .O Public Health Prevent. Promote. Protect. Bloomington Public Health Division j Tri -Gity Zbl Part ners o for Healthy Youth and Communities oornington TCP coalition members work with the community to identify current and emerging problems or gaps related to healthy youth development. It works to resolve these by involving the community in developing and implementing solutions. Currently, the TCP Coalition concentrates on the following areas: • Underage drinking prevention • Marijuana and other drug use prevention • Policy change • Youth development /promoting youth protective factors ■ Positive social norm marketing campaigns ti • Sustainah!.,ty and Cultural '� Competence The TCP Coalition uses the Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF) during the planning process (graphic at right). The SPF is a community -based risk and protective factors approach to prevention with a series of community -level guiding principles. It requires the following systematic process: 1. AsseSS TCP's prevention needs based on data 2. Build TCP's prevention Capacity 3. Develop a strategic Plan 4. Implement effective community prevention programs, policies and practices 5. Evaluate our efforts for outcomes ■ Analyzed, prepared and presented Minnesota Student Survey (MSS) data for Bloomington, Edina and Richfield (BER) school districts. ■ Presented MSS data to 16 BER community groups including 2 school boards, Bloomington Safe and Drug Free Advisory Council, Richfield Collaborative, Edina Chemical Health Partners (ECHP), Richfield Residents Engaged in Asset Development for Youth (READY), two Bloomington parent focus groups and at the annual Bloomington Schools Chemical Health Workshop. ■ Monitored monthly BER school and city staff reports for youth alcohol, tobacco and curfew violations. ■ Created and disseminated Youth Health Reports based on MSS data for each city. Added electronic versions of the reports to TCP and City of Bloomington Public Health websites. ■ Partnered with BER Police Departments to prepare for and monitor alcohol and tobacco compliance check results in the three cities. Recognized successful establishments in TCP E -News. ■ Surveyed 75 youth aged 12 -18 regarding 1) alcohol, tobacco and marijuana use, 2) perception of risk, 3) level of parental disapproval and 4) tobacco and drug use. The survey's purpose was to assess our impact in our communities and identify areas for targeted improvement. ■ Conducted two parent focus groups in collaboration with Bloomington Schools to gather input on engage parents in Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug (ATOD) prevention. ■ Conducted 20 key informant interviews with community leaders to gain their perspectives regarding youth substance abuse issues within the communities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield. Bloomington Public Health continued to provide contract services to coordinate the Safe and Drug •Free Schools Program for Bloomington Public Schools. This resulted in numerous joint prevention activities which included 1) sponsoring a Chemical Health workshop for Bloomington schools staff, 2) providing a parent workshop on marijuana use, 3) distributing substance use prevention messages to parents and students, 4) conducting parent focus groups and 5) re- launching the Bloomington Safe House Parent Network. • Assisted in planning and carrying out two statewide Shutting Off the Tap to Teens and Young Adult's skill - building conferences. • Collaborated with MADD on Youth Jam which provided youth with opportunities to enhance their skills in the area of underage drinking prevention. • Prepared and distributed the TCP Coalition e- newsletter to 350 people each month. • Drafted a cultural competency plan and presented it to the TCP steering committee. • Organized a culturally specific train - the - trainer session on facilitating the "Positive Parenting" workshop. The purpose was to build TCP's capacity to reach Somali and African American parents. ■ Supported three different community high school youth initiatives for ongoing, underage drinking prevention efforts. Groups involved in the initiatives included Edina High School Sober Squad, Kennedy High School IGNITE, and Jefferson High School Positive Forces for Change. ■ Promoted Tri City Partners Coalition efforts in three community cable television interviews. Two interviews aired on "Bloomington Today" and one aired on "In Edina." �■ Promoted two Hennepin County Drug Collection Take Back events. ■ Provided TCP orientation to four new coalition members. ■ Provided training to TCP coalition steering committee members on environmental strategies. Jay Jaffee from the Minnesota Department of Human Services presented the training. ■ Convened two action teams. A Policy Action Team worked on preparing for Social Host Ordinances and a Social Norms Action Team worked on the Together We Stand campaign. •■ Facilitated a "Planning for Success" strategic planning workshop for the TCP Coalition. ■ Recruited five hotel /motel managers for a pilot project to draft guidelines for deterring underage drinking in hotels /motels. ■ Developed prevention materials for parents including "Raising Drug Free Kids: Advice by Age."