Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-10-16 COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS OCTOBER 16, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of October 2, 2012 and Work Session Of October 2, 2012 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 10/04/2012, TOTAL $ 497,988.19 And Per Pre -List Dated 10/11/12 TOTAL $1,156,864.09 C. Request For Purchase —Aquatic Center Utility Repairs Contact No. PK12 -5 D. Request For Purchase —Truck Body And Plow Replacement — Public Works E. Request For Purchase — Tandem Axle Cab And Truck Chassis — Public Works F. Request For Purchase — Braemar Arena Three Furnaces And Air Conditioning Units G. Resolution No. 2012 -143 Authorizing An Application To The Metropolitan Council For A Livable Community Act Tax Base Revitalization Account For The Redevelopment Of The Pentagon Park Property V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Fire Department Certificates of Merit —Tom Shirley and Doug May B. Kids Voting VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is Agenda /Edina City Council October 16, 2012 Page 2 relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING — Special Assessments Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -370— Resolution No. 2012 -124 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS — - Site Plan Review, Bruce Carlson, 7501 France Avenue, Resolution No. 2012 -143 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARINGS — Southdale Apartments — Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, Front Yard Setback Variance, Parking Stall Variance and Subdivision at 10 Southdale Center for Stuart Development Company, Resolution Nos. 2012 -141 and 2012 -142 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) D. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Ordinance No. 2012 -18 Amending Section 850 — Produce Stand in the RMD, Regional Medical District (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present=to approve except where noted) A. Consider Special Assessment Roll - Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -334— Resolution No. 2012 -121 B. Resolution Nos. 2012 -138, 2012 -139 & 2012 -140 Awarding Sale Of G.O. Bonds Series 2012A, 2012B & 2012C C. Second Reading Ordinance No. 2012 -15 Franchise Ordinance CenterPoint Energy D. Second Reading Ordinance No. 2012 -16 Franchise Ordinance Xcel 1 Tues Tues Mon Mon Tues Fri Sat "4on as aes Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council October 16, 2012 Page 3 E. Sketch Plan Review Restaurant Proposal At 7700 France Avenue F. Resolution No. 2012 -137 Accepting Various Donations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Edina Transportation Commission, August 16, 2012 2. Heritage Preservation Board, September 11, 2012 and October 1, 2012 3. Park Board, September 11, 2012 4. Building Construction Board, July 23, 2012 5. Art Center Board, June 28, 2012, July 26, 2012, and August 23, 2012 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Oct 16 Work Session — Art Center Study /Business Meeting 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 5 Work Session — Human Services Funding/Liquor Ordinance 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 6 ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M. Nov 9 Canvass of Election Returns 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 10 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M. —Noon EDINA SENIOR CENTER Nov 12 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 20 Work Session — Finalize 2013 Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 4 Work Session — Name Your Neighborhood 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 18 Work Session — Park Brd Work Group Donation /Naming Policy 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 2, 2012 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. IL ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.F. Resolution No. 2012 -134, approving encroachment agreement for 4402 France Avenue; and, Item IV.H. Resolution No. 2012 -136, no parking on Antrim Road from West 70th Street to Valley View Road and on Cahill Road from Dewey Hill Road to West 78th Street, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular, work session, and closed meeting minutes of September 19, 2012 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 20, 2012, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $432,197.36; Police Special Revenue $104.93; Working Capital Fund $860,264.80; Equipment Replacement Fund $169,560.99; Construction Fund $17,086.38; Art Center Fund $932.98; Aquatic Center Fund $7,042.25; Golf Course Fund $79,956.87; Ice Arena Fund $4,086.16; Edinborough Park Fund $3,659.26; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,399.48; Liquor Fund $164,268.05; Utility Fund $661,368.36; Storm Sewer Fund $256,128.20; PSTF Agency Fund $597.90; Centennial TIF District $1,184.91; TOTAL $2.660.838.88 and for approval of payment of claims dated September 27, 2012, and consisting of 36 pages; General Fund $293,913.80; Police Special Revenue $105.46; Working Capital Fund $144,898.21; Equipment Replacement Fund $750.00; Art Center Fund $4,451.05; Golf Dome Fund $4,957.82; Aquatic Center Fund $741.76; Golf Course Fund $26,631.02; Ice Arena Fund $394,091.94; Edinborough Park Fund $2,698.84; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $6,359.19; Liquor Fund $206,655.88; Utility Fund $249,420.94; Storm Sewer Fund $33,324.72; Recycling Fund $32.86; PSTF Agency Fund $9,843.91; TOTAL $1.378.877.40: and, Credit Card Transactions dated July 26 - August 25, 2012; TOTAL $34.111.43. IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -131, 2012 -132, and 2012 -137 providing for sale of G.O. Bonds Series 2012A, 2012B and 2012C IV.D. Adopt Resolution 2012 -133 appointing election judges for general election IV.E. Approve one -year extension of the City Facilities Refuse and Recycling Collection Contract with Aspen Waste IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -135, authorizing special assessments for water service line repair, 6033 Wooddale Avenue H Rpnol-.tion No 2019_136 aFki Rg OR Antrim Road irem West 7& and- en Cahill Ra-ad- fir-a-m- Dewey Well Read- to 1AWIP14 0-StFeet Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2, 2012 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -134 ADOPTED — APPROVING ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR 4402 FRANCE AVENUE Engineer Houle explained the encroachment agreement would allow an extension of utility service under the alleyway. Attorney Knutson advised the encroachment agreement language adequately addressed the issue of liability. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -134, approving encroachment agreement for 4402 France Avenue. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.H. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -136 ADOPTED — NO PARKING ON ANTRIM ROAD FROM WEST 70TH STREET TO VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND ON CAHILL ROAD FROM DEWEY HILL ROAD TO WEST 78TH STREET Council members asked about the proposed resolution to prohibit parking on the east side of Antrim Road. Mr. Houle stated that staff had determined that the majority of residential properties were on the west side of the street, meaning that on- street parking on the west side would provide convenience parking to more homes. In addition, the long block from West 70th Street to Valley View Road would allow for a continuous bike lane adjacent to the continuous parking lane. Mr. Houle affirmed that the church on the east side of Antrim Road had an off - street parking lot and that the side street south of the church provided additional spaces for on- street parking. Mr. He-ule indicated staff ,- e-+„r..,,.,,,a the F *ty .,f r s*deF;tial had an „ff_stFee,. .,.long !At and the side street allei .ed .,along Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -136, for parking restriction on Antrim Road from West 70th Street to Valley View Road and Cahill Road from Dewey Hill Road to West 781h Street. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. 100 BEST COMMUNITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ANNOUNCED Heather Haen Anderson, Executive Director for Connecting with Kids, announced the City of Edina had been named by America's Promise Alliance, for the third consecutive year, as one of America's 100 best communities for young people. Julie Rogers Bascom, Service Learning Coordinator with Edina Public Schools, thanked all who had contributed to the application and Edina's recognition. V.B. FIRE PREVENTION WEEK PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring Fire Prevention Week. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving proclamation declaring October 7 -13, 2012, Fire Prevention Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Fire Chief Scheerer accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council for its continued support of the Fire Department, which had resulted in a historically low number of fires given its population. He encouraged residents to test smoke detectors and recognized Police Officer Ryan Schultz for rescuing family members during a recent fire. V, C. POLICE COMMENDATIONS ANNOUNCED Page 2 w Minutes /Edina City Council /October.2.2012 Police Chief Long presented Distinguished Officer Awards to Police Officers Vik Konters and Jim Rygg. The Council and audience responded with a round of applause. VI. PUBLIC HEARING5HELD.— Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A.. .SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Mr. Houle described the final assessments public hearing process, in compliance with Chapter 429, and ° summarized options for payback, repayment periods, and interest charged at 1 %. over the net interest rate. Finance Director Wallin explained the 1% over net interest rate was to cover the City's cost for bonds to finance the assessments, underpayments, and negative arbitrage. VI.A.1. TREE REMOVAL —IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -12 —RESOLUTION NO. 2012-116 ADOPTED Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Kattreh presented Code Section 1055 that called'for the removal of trees with Dutch elm or oak wilt disease. She described the process to identify diseased trees, property owner notification, and options for removal. Ms. Kattreh presented the assessment roll for six properties to be assessed for tree removal plus an administrative fee. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by.Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett,. Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -116, levying special assessments for Improvement No. TR -12 Tree Removal. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.2. AQUATIC WEEDS: IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -12 —RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -117 ADOPTED Ms. Kattreh presented the assessment roll for City - administered aquatic weed control service upon request by homeowners. She displayed a map of the areas of improvementand presented the assessment roll for 33 Indianhead. Lake residents to be assessed $399..93 per home for a total of $13,197:78; 36 . Arrowhead Lake residents to be assessed $380.32 per home for a total of $13,691.46;.and,.63 Minnehaha Creek'Mill Pond properties to be assessed $69.05 per home for a total of $4,350.00. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:40.p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -117, levying special assessments for Improvement No. AQ -12 Aquatic Weeds. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Page 3 Minutes /Edina :City Council /October 2.2012 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V1. A.3. WEED MOWING. IMPROVEMENT NO. .'WD -12 —RESOLUTION NO. 2012-118 ADOPTED Ms. Kattreh reviewed the Code requirement for maintenance of vegetation and the process used by the City's Weed Inspector to notify -the 7property owner to comply. If compliance was not gained, the weeds were. cut by Park Maintenance staff and the cost assessed. Ms..Kattreh presented the assessment roll for eight properties `that would be certified to. the County Assessor for collection in addition to .an administrative fee: Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. . Public Testimony No,one appeared to comment. MemberBrindle made,a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -118, levying special assessments for Improvement No:, WD -12 Weed Mowing. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett; Brindle, Sprague; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.4. SOT" & FRANCE MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -12 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-119 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the assessment roll for properties within the 50th and France maintenance area that would' be assessed $0.6906 per square foot, an increase. over 2011 due to additional paver replacement within the area. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7 :45 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to'comment... Member Sprague made a: motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague,. Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -119, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. - VI.A.S. GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT, MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO., G -12 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -120 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the assessment roll for properties within the Grandview Business District to be assessed $0.0144 per square foot, a decrease from 2011 due to replacing fewer plants. It was noted that staff anticipated an increase in the 2014 assessment for additional plant replacements and modifications to the irrigation system. Page 4 . :Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2, 2012 Mayor Hovland. opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. Public Testimonv No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -120, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Swenson seconded the motion. -- Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.6. MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO.. BA -334 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-121 POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 16, 2012 Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the Minnehaha Woods neighborhood street reconstruction project totaling $1,550,781.54 with a total project cost (including utilities and bridge) of $4,581,773.19. The City's contribution towards utility costs was $3,030,991.65 (66% of the total project). The assessment cost was $1,989,775.51 or $10,363.41 per Resident Equivalent Unit (REU). It was noted this assessment was 12% lower than the estimated assessment of $11,800.00. Mr. Houle indicated an e-mail of objection had been received from David Liebl of 5536 Park Place. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Public Testimonv Jeremiah Kearney, 5420 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Council. Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, addressed the Council. Mark Swenson, 5501 Dever Drive, addressed the Council. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Larry Lomax, 5516 Park Place, addressed the Council. John Crabtree, 5408 OaklawrrAvenue, addressed -the Council. Darren Wennen, 5525 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Elizabeth Johnson - McGarry, 5513 Brookview, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Paul Pasko, SEH Engineering, and Mr. Houle addressed issues raised. during public testimony. Mr. Pasko explained the contractor provided a one -year warranty that began September 2012 and items would be placed on a punch list and resolved with the contractor. In addition, performance bonds were in place. Mr. Houle indicated the sod had a 42 -day warranty, which was a Mn /DOT specification, and had been an Page 5 'Minutes /Edina Citytouncil /October 2, 2012 issue on all projects due to the drought. He stated staff would determine whether hydroseeding was an option and potential funding source. L Mr. Pasko. apologized that mis- scheduling had occurred and resulted in additional costs to residents. He explained a lot of effort goes into assuring those conflicts do not occur between the - City's contractor and resident's private contractor. The Council questioned the higher engineering percentages charged for an engineering consultant in comparison to in -house engineering. Mr. Pasko explained the City generally called upon engineering consultants for projects that required additional technical expertise and bench strength. It was considered to be competitive when within a range .17% to 21% of the project cost. Mr. Houle reviewed engineering Dercentaees -for :past groiects. He exigla;,;ed that iRthe Bast. the City SP-d- 1594- fA-.r iR-h--,;4 +^ *"^ d;rp t r lip ^f ° ^^Fecentage. He explained that in the past, the City had applied a charge of 15% of project cost for in -house engineering. The Special Assessment Policy had been revised to charge direct engineering costs instead of a p f.-Mr. Neal advised that prior to'the lawsuit, the charges between City engineering and private consultant engineering were comparable. He stated SEH was not over charging but, perhaps, the City was undercharging and not attributing all overhead +'or total compensation costs towards the project. It was noted the engineering percentage for this project was within an appropriate range; Mr. Pasko described the difference between Type,l and Type II trunk sanitary sewer construction and costs for each. The Council discussed the methodology of estimating private sewer line replacement costs and situations where the private. contractor charged more than -the City's contractor. Mr. Houle stated this was the second of three projects where the upgrade of the private sanitary sewer was required. In this project, the contractor bid the open cut portion lower than the SEH estimate. But, by that time, many of the homeowners had already contracted with a aprivate contractor. Mr. Houle noted if the majority of homeowners had utilized the City's contractor, the cost per service would have been higher because it would have included trenchless work. The Council asked questions of staff related to timing of the bid, notification to residents, number of Type I and Type II properties, and when residents received updates. Mr. Pasko explained the need to keep the project moving forward with a project of this 'size,, so it would not, involve two seasons for street reconstruction. Mr. Houle indicated for the next y'ear's projects, the schedule would be moved up with public hearings held the first week in December, bids received in February/March, and numbers would then be available to help residents make an informed decision. Mr. Pasko explained that based on the Country Club project where approximately eighty percent of the property owners contracted privately raedel --ef _89/20, it was assumed that not all property owners would use the City's contractor so the assumption was backed off to about sixty peecent.private contractors vs., forty percent Project contractor. He stated it was known if property would be Type I or Type ,II but the issue was the estimate on the number of residents who would use a private contractor and who would use the City's contractor so staff used a past - project model. In,this project, homeowners knew as early as February which type of process (cured in place /open cut) was required for their property and the approximate cost. The Council indicated it understood this was difficult work and the intention was to determine where money could have been saved for residents. Member Bennett T"-, wnei asked whether Ci y tall, shad received all of the special assessment agreements, noting it appeared about 20 were missing from the information provided in the meeting packet. Mr. Knutson advised that all of the assessment agreements had to be received prior to taking action. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2. 201 With regard to notifying residents that the City's contractor might charge a lower fee for sewer connections, Mr. Houle explained that based on the higher base prices with the Country Club project, staff anticipated this project would also be higher. Based on that assumption, staff had encouraged residents to complete work on their private property. However, the same contractor was awarded both bids and also had the Richmond Hills project so it wanted to get private contractors out of the right -of -way and estimated lower prices. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to postpone indefinitely consideration of Resolution No. 2012 -121, levying special assessments for public improvements. Mr. Neal recommended postponing to October 16, 2012. Member Bennett made a substitute motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to postpone consideration of Resolution No. 2012 -121, levying special assessments for public improvements to October 16, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.7. GOLF TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION —IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -355 —RESOLUTION NO. 2012-122 ADOPTED Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the Golf Terrace neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $1,016,002.93 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $2,469,733.92. The City's contribution towards utility costs was $1,453,730.99 (59% of the total project) The assessment cost was $1,126,525.73 or $12,379.40 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 4-OA 0.3% lower than the estimated assessment of $12,417.58. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:02 p.m. Public Testimony Susan Covnick, 4715 Golf Terrace, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Houle addressed the landscaping concern raised during public testimony, explaining it was bid separately from the general contractor and had a two -year maintenance contract. He indicated staff would determine how often it had been maintained and suggested residents not perform maintenance since it was the responsibility of the landscape contractor and the rain garden had been designed by a professional landscape architect. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -122, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.& WEST 70TH STREET NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -367 & A -241 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-123 ADOPTED Member Sprague recused himself and left the chambers as his property was within this improvement project. Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the West 701h Street neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $496,192.96 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $3,199,527.46. The City's contribution toward utility costs was $702,335.47 (46-- 21.95% of the total project). The assessment cost was $511,316.51 or $3,706.54 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 2% lower than the estimated assessment of $3,795.70. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2. 2012 Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:20 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -123, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. 1 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague returned to the Council dais. VI.A.9. CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 — PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION NO. 2012-124 CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 16, 2012 Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the Carson's Hill neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $1,143,811.37 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $1,827,254.08. The City's contribution toward utility costs was $683,442.71(37% of the total project). The assessment cost was $1,254,398.85 or $7,743.20 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 17% lower than the estimated assessment of $9,316.77. Mr. Houle advised that a letter of objection had been received from Chris Johnson of 5308 Highwood Drive. The Council indicated there were 161 REUs in the project area; however, the assessment roll was based on 162 REUs. Mr. Knutson advised if the assessment amount increased, the Council would not have to hold another hearing but the change would have to be noticed. Mr. Houle recommended a continuance to allow time for staff to verify the number of REUs. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to continue the public hearing for consideration of Resolution No. 2012 -124, levying special assessments for public improvements, to October 16, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.10. KILLARNEY SHORES NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -371 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-125 ADOPTED Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the Killarney Shores neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $509,039.12 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $941,408.03. The City's contribution toward utility costs was $432,368.03 (42 45.9% of the total project). The assessment cost was $554,147.85 or $7,196.73 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 26% lower than the estimated assessment of $9,740.26. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:33 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2. 2012 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -125, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.11. MCCAULEY HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -372 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-126 ADOPTED Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the McCauley Heights neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $140,851.43 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $216,189.50. The City's contribution toward utility costs was $75,338.07 (35% of the total project). The assessment cost was $169,683.31 or $6,476.46 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 2-& 7.6-% lower than the estimated assessment of $7,000. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:35 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -126, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.12. OSCAR ROBERTS NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -373 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-127 ADOPTED Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the Oscar Roberts neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $305,633.20 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $639,888.91 The City's contribution toward utility costs was $334,255.71 (52% of the total project). The assessment cost was $358,757.60 or $4,429.11 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 15% lower than the estimated assessment of $5,200.00. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:38 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -127, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2. 2012 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.13. WEST 44' STREET NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -383 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-128 ADOPTED Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the West 44`h Street neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $211,591.94 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $2,499,540.33. The City's contribution toward utility costs was $1,229,512.04 (49% of the total project). The assessment cost was $218,566.21 or $2,031.85.94 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 5% lower than the estimated assessment of $2,138.24. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -128, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.A.14. RIDGE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -384 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-129 ADOPTED Mr. Houle displayed a map of the improvement area and presented the costs for the Ridge Road neighborhood reconstruction project totaling «^ $',� -781. $142,210.15 with a total project cost (including utilities) of $^,581 -2.19 $713,632.87. The City's contribution toward utility costs was $3,93965 $571,422.72{&6 80% of the total project). The assessment cost was $261,622.00 or $10,930.82 for 17.67 REUs and $9,787.26 for o7 REUS. It was noted this assessment was 42LOA .63% lower than the estimated assessment of $11,000.00. It was also noted the assessment roll had been corrected to address the type of curb and gutter installed. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:45 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -129, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 10 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2. 2012 VI.B. CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES IMPROVEMENT NO. DU -12 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 130 ADOPTED Mr. Wallin presented certification of delinquent utilities per Statute 444.075 and City Code. He described the notification process for utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent 15 days or longer. It was noted customers had opportunity to pay overdue balances up until November 16, 2012. A $30 administrative fee would be added and assessed for one year at 6.5% interest. Mr. Wallin noted the assessment roll included three Edina properties that received St Louis Park utility service. Four Edina properties received Richfield utility services pursuant to agreements between the cities; however, none were included in the delinquent list. Mr. Wallin reported that in August, 950 properties were sent notices for a total of $382,346.29. He compared that number to previous years. It was noted the final delinquent list would be attached to the draft resolution and sent to Hennepin County for certification. Mr. Wallin answered questions of the Council related to a commercial establishment that, in the past, had been delinquent in payment of utilities. Mr. Wallin advised that business was not on this current list but continued to owe Hennepin County for past certifications and taxes. Mr. Neal indicated that business was in compliance with the agreement reached. Mr. Wallin reviewed the circumstances of the $13,000 delinquency on a commercial establishment and indicated that 90% of certifications were paid within one year and the remaining 10% paid over a five to six year period. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:55 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -130, authorizing the certification of delinquent utility charges to the Hennepin County Auditor. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-114 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -114 accepting various donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. Page 11 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 2. 2012 IX.B. PETITION DO. TOWN REGARDING PARK AND PLAYGROUND AT LAKE EDINA PARK— RECEIVED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to receive do.town petition regarding park and playground at Lake Edina Park. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. C. ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE. 1. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, AUGUST 9, 2012 2. EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION, AUGUST 28, 2012 Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 16, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 2, 2012, meeting available. Page 12 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 2, 2012 5:09 P.M. CALL TO ORDER /ROLL CALL Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:09 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte,- Communications and Technology Services Director; Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering; Ann Kattreh; Assistant Park & Recreation.. Director;,, Ari Klugman, City Manager, Intern; Karen. Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City_ Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Brian, Olson, Public Works Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief; and John Wallin, ,Finance Director.t 2013 -2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVIEWED Manager Neal explained that the proposed 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Program had been prepared with a different process. A staff subcommittee made up of Karen Kurt, Eric Roggeman; and Ari Klugman reviewed all of the staffs' submissions and assigned a prioritization number to them. This was then reviewed by the Executive Leadership Team. Following the Council's review staff will make any requested updates. Assistant Finance Director Roggeman gave a brief overview of the biennial budget process that the City has begun following. This included a review of the 2013 proposed tax levies, the funds available for Construction Fund projects, why prioritization was important, and the staff prioritization process followed. Mr. Roggeman listed the factors the subcommittee considered while prioritizing the CIP and the CIP prioritization scale, the process followed by staff, brought up new items to consider, reviewed the HRA fund and budget timeline. Items discussed during the Council's review included: Wooddale Park accessible playground, use of private donations to fund" public .projects, Lake Edina Park needs, Braemar Golf Course's cart path project and driving range project, 2013 Pedestrian* and- !Bicyclist Safety Projects (Xerxes Avenue, Normandale Avenue,, West 42 "d Street and School Road), West Wd /France Avenue Bridge, Bike Boulevard, Living Streets, and public safety projects. Questions includedJunds available, time and funds necessary for planning projects as well as construction of projects, what happened to projects that had been on the 2012 CIP but were now off, and what happened to projects put into the "parking lot ". Staff would make adjustments and get more data as directed by Council, update the proposed 2013 -2017 CIP and get it onto the website to allow time for citizen input before the proposed December 4, 2012 hearing. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 16, 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor �:, R_55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 1 912812012 — 10/412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364033 9/28/2012 100961 POSTMASTER.- USPS 7,009.31 ABOUT-TOWN POSTAGE 298448 092712 . 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 7,009.31 364034 101412012 130923 24-7 POWER 250.00 GENERATOR SERVICE 00001193 298577 1340 - EDINA 5900.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 250.00 364035 10/412012 130913 365 CONSTRUCTION INC. 4,400.00 SEWER REC 298312 ED116174 5901.4645 WATER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 8,800.00 WATER REC 298312 ED116174 5901.4645 WATER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 26,015.00 SAC..REFUND - 298312 ED116174 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 39,215.00 ' 364036 1014/2012 125324 3M 25.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00001146 298578 02038624 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.00 364037 101412012 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 22:52 SOD 00001139 298070 4187 1643.6543 SOD &BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 22.52 364038 101412012 101871 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 349.53 HOSES, CLAMPS, 00001180 298449 1- 843275 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 349.53 364039 101412012 105075' ABSOLUTE RAINING. 668.91 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00002311 298434 31292 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES 668.91 364040 1014/2012 — 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS' 741.00 UB TEMP 298071 36346338 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 644.67 UB TEMP 298579 36370394 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 1,385.67 364041 101412012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 142.80 298497 1616271 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 70.80 298498 1616266 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING ' 175.60 298683 1616265 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 389.20 364042 10/4/2012 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 16.47 PART FOR POOL HEATER 00001178 298580 171953 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.23 GALVANIZED PIPE 00001189 298581 172801 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1013/2012 8:27:42 Page- 2 Business Unit POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 26.70 364043 . 101412012 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 1,000.00 TRAILER JACKS 00003826 298582 27871 421480.6710 600.00 00003826 298583 28168 421480.6710 1,600.00 364044 10/412012 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 28.42 PEST CONTROL 298584 750455 5421.6102 28.42 364045 101412012 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 650.88 CLOCK REPAIR 298585 35651 5511.6406 650.88 364046 101412012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 144.95 COFFEE 298586 156062 5730.5510 144.95 364047 1014/2012 130912 ALLARD, BARRY 35.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 298313 092412 4090.4751 35.00 364048 101412012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 564.19 DEF FLUID, MUD FLAPS 00005576 298072 AFS- 222640014 1553.6530 217.00 FUEL SUPPLEMENT 00005525 298073 AFS- 222560018 1553.6530 781.19 364049 101412012 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 489.39 RADIO REPAIRS 298587 32190 1470.6180 489.39 364050 1014/2012 130915 ANDERSON, STEVE 177.44 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 298314 7700 GLASGOW DR 5900.2015 177.44 364051 10/412012 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 452.00 FOOD 298074 1802394 5730.5510 1,235.90 FOOD 298315 1802636 5421.5510 1,687.90 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1013/2012 8:27:42 Page- 2 Business Unit POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CITY OF EDINA 1013/2012 8:27:42 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/2812012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364052 1014/2012 118491 APPLE INC. 988.31 IPAD 00004361 298075 4204036318 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 988.31 364053 101412012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS - 106.38 COFFEE SERVICE MAINTENANCE 298588 ' 1036997 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 106.38 364054 10/412012 120451 --ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDE 5,254.58 ENGINEERING SERVICES 298589 SEPTEMBER 2012 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 5,254.58 364055 101412012 100256 AT&T MOBILITY, 25.96 IPAD DATA 298350 287240706569X91 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 712 25.96 364056 1014/2012 127214. ATLAS FOUNDATION COMPANY 19,370.00 BRIDGE ABUTMENTS 00001879, 298450 988413 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 19,370.00 364057 101412012 101196 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 213.64 PUMP 00005303 298451 151969 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.64 - -' 364058 101412012 126300 BAUMAN, DOUG 190.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298653 092812 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 190.92 1 364059 101412012 130924 BEARING INDUSTRIAL & SUPPLIES -- 166.75 BALL BEARINGS 00005626 298452 0033040 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.75 364060 101412012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,839.40 298365 75198600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD11000R VERNON SELLING 832.65 298366 75198300 5842.5512 COSTOF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 675.35 298367 74534400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 772.40 298368 75198400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.43 298369 87339800 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 54.26 298370 87363800 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 432.65 298499 75288100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 42.55 20.50 117.18 364061 CITY OF EDINA 125139 BERNICK'S WINE Council Check Register 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 298500 75198200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 298684 75287900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 298685 87392300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 298686 625080D 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 298687 87392200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 364061 101412012 125139 BERNICK'S WINE 352.00 298501 21409 5842.5514 352.00 364062 1014/2012 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 131.50 COFFEE 298590 1043176 5520.5510 150.95 COFFEE 298591 1043191 1552.6406 282.45 364063 101412012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 35.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003073 298592 WO- 797087 -1 1400.6513 76.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003081 298593 WO- 798404 -1 1400.6513 211.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003086 298594 WO- 799953 -1 1400.6513 322.70 364064 101412012 130922 BI WORLDWIDE 5,852.00 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION AWARDS 298453 ME- 663654 1513.6103 5,852.00 364065 101412012 130569 BINTNER, ROSS 72.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298454 091712 1260.6107 60.00 CLEAN WATER SUMMIT 298455 092112 1260.6104 132.92 364066 101412012 103250 BLOOMINGTON MEDALIST BAND 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 10114112 298316 092512 5710.6136 75.00 364067 1014/2012 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 763.20 DOOR REPAIR 298595 578862 5421.6180 763.20 364068 10/412012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 88.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 298076 80159 1495.6406 48.67 298077 80108 1495.6406 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page- 4 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 10!3/2012 8:27:42 . Page- 5 INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES. GENERAL 87.00 298371 16782 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS.SOLD MIX R55CKREG LOG20000 5,943.15 298372 167281 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 820.45 Council Check Register 167278 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.75 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 167277 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 147.84 298078 80107 1495.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES'. 285.18 _ 114.00 298502 94467 364069 1014/2012 YORK SELLING 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,316.81 AMBULANCE-SUPPLIES 00003868 298596 80878839 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES: 20.20 00003879 - 298597 80881020 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 5430.6186 HEAT . 158.25 00003879 - 298598 80882162 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1551.6186 HEAT 1,495.26 480.19 5546504 -1 298082 5546504 -9112 364070 101412012 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 114690 BRILL, DON - 8034001 -1 298083 8034001 -9/12 1552.6186 HEAT 750.00 FIREWOOD 00002310 298435 092112 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6186 HEAT 750.00 2,381.79 364071 101412012 119626 BRYANT.GRAPHICS INC. 123898. CENTURYLINK 796.80 OCT NEWSLETTER 298079 29132 1628.6575 PRINTING 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 796.80 364072 101412012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO ' . 15.00.. BACKGROUND CHECK - 298654 092812- 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15.00 364073 101412012. 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 10!3/2012 8:27:42 . Page- 5 INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES. GENERAL 87.00 298371 16782 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS.SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,943.15 298372 167281 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 820.45 298373 167278 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.75 298374 167277 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6,867.35 364074 101412012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE _ 114.00 298502 94467 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 114.00 364075 101412012 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 16.27 5596524 -8 298080 5596524 -9/12 5430.6186 HEAT . RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,704.20 5591458 -4 298081 5591458 -9/12 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 480.19 5546504 -1 298082 5546504 -9112 1470.6186 HEAT . FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.89 8034001 -1 298083 8034001 -9/12 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19,24 298456 5528973 -9112 1552.6186 HEAT CENT -SVC PW BUILDING 2,381.79 364076 101412012 123898. CENTURYLINK 63.80 952 922 -2444 - 298351 24449/12 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 6 9128/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 117.98 952 920 -8166 298352 8166 -9/12 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 56.62 952 920 -8632 298655 8632 -9/12 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 238.40 364077 1014/2012 130911 CHAMBERLAIN, USA 30.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 298317 092412 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 30.00 364078 1014/2012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 184.95 298375 483292 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING .184.95 364079 10/412012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTIUTIES 326.84 00113667- 0120835016 298084 120835016 -9/12 5111.6189 SEWER & WATER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 3,470.91 00077479- 0113317143 298085 113317143 -9/12 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 49.28 00110793- 0173001000 298318 173001000 -9/12 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER RANGE 49.28 00110793- 0173001001 298319 173001001 -9/12 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 3,857.55 00110793- 0155200000 298320 155200000 -9/12 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 110.03 00110793- 0155250018 298321 155250018 -9/12 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 326.84 00079303 - 0155300018 298599 155300018 -9/12 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 49.28 00079303 - 0155300009 298600 155300009 -9112 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 8,240.01 364080 101412012 105194 CITY OF RICHFIELD 352.61 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE BANQUET 298086 EDINA SR CENTER 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 352.61 364081 101412012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 259.20 298503 0108036514 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 259.20 364082 101412012 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800.80 OCT 2012 MAINTENANCE 298322 10/01/12 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 800.80 364083 10/412012 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 150.00 SIGNAULIGHTING CERTIFICATION 298457 REGISTRATION 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 150.00 364084 1014/2012 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 158.22 CLEAN /FLUSH RADIATOR 00005636 298601 17187 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 158.22 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 7 Business Unit -,PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET .364087 101412012 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 13,990.40 Council Check Register 00001283 298656 10257 5913.6103 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 DISTRIBUTION Check # Date Amount- Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 364085 101412012 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 371.72 PRO.SHOP GIFT_ CERTIFICATES 298602 00063809 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 371.72 364086 10/4/2012 130131 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE 191.31 DEGREASER 00005618 115.01 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 285397 5845 BEARD AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN S 84.43 DISINFECTING SPRAY 115.01 ' 2512319 1646.6406 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 7 Business Unit -,PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET .364087 101412012 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 13,990.40 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001283 298656 10257 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 13,990.40 364088 101412012 104020 DALCO 191.31 DEGREASER 00005618 298087 2511820 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.43 DISINFECTING SPRAY 00001185 298088 2512319 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 141.78 HAND TOWELS 00001454 298458 2511827 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 417.52 364089 101412012 102478 DAY.DISTRIBUTING CO. 36.80 298376 669813 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 788.40 298377 669812 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 66.30 298378 668843 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,383.30 298379 668842 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 827.10 298380 669814 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING - 119.60 298381 669815 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK'SELLING 4,855.78 298504 669811 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 44.80 298505' 669810 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,122.08 364090 101412012 100718 -DELEGARD TOOL CO. 91.70. FLUID EVACUATOR; HEX BITS 00005532 298459 729713 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.67 PLIERS 00005533 298460 729795 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.77 MOWING TOOL 00001135 298603 729786 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.14 364091 101412012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 44.32 . BAKERY 298323 427043 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 75.34. 298324 427279 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 77,26 298325 427274 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 196.92 R55CKREG L6G20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 364092 101412012 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 9,193.84 AUG 2012 SURCHARGE 298424 15007053060 1495.4380 9,193.84 364093 101412012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 56.30 650243624 298436 650243624 -9/12 5760.6122 56.30 364094 101412012 121546 DICK, KENNA 62.97 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 298708 091712 1400.6104 62.97 364095 101412012 130819 DOLCE VITA JAZZ 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 10/7/12 298326 092512 5710.6136 150.00 364096 101412012 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 166.38 BITS 00001160 298461 09278701 1301.6556 166.38 364097 101412012 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 46.00 GYM PERMIT 46090 298089 13660 1623.6406 154.00 GYM PERMIT 45962 298089 13660 1624.6406 200.00 364098 101412012 130918 ELMHORST, ANNA 102.00 CLASS REFUND 298421 092612 5101.4607 102.00 364099 10/412012 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 3,802.44 T -90 REPAIRS 298604 63993 1470.6180 3,120.07 T -90 REPAIRS 298605 63915 1470.6180 6,922.51 364100 101412012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 37.10 RADIATOR TANK 00005594 298090 1- 3993949 1553.6530 23.20 ELEMENT 00005594 298091 69- 077596 1553.6530 36.44 CREDIT 298353 1- 3988528 1553.6530 166.13 WINDSHIELD FLUID 00005594 298462 1- 3994570 1553.6530 134.24 WIPER BLADES 00005594 298463 1- 3994800 1553.6530 15.43 THERMOSTAT 00005594 298464 69- 078625 1553.6530 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 8 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SURCHARGE ADVERTISING OTHER INSPECTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300 00 ANNUAL USER MEETING 298657 52975 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 364104 1014/2012 100764 G & K SERVICES Council Check Register 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 298607 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 5422.6201 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description' 1006135584 5422.6201 12.52 WHEEL SEAL _00005594' 298465 69- 078640 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 83.00- _RETURN 298466 69- 077609 1553.6530 REPAIR.PARTS 101412012 269.18 364101 101412012 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298658 093012 1130.6107 53.49 HARDWARE 00001022 298092 MNTC2113698 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.49 364106 _ 364102 101412012 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC- 423.02 HALLIGAN TOOLS. 00003886 298606 7644 1470.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 1324717 1646.6530 423.02 155.01 364103 1014/2012 104446 FORELRESERVATIONS INC. - 364107 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300 00 ANNUAL USER MEETING 298657 52975 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE 300.00 364104 1014/2012 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 298607 1006113382 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 298608 1006135584 5422.6201 LAUNDRY . 30.00 364105 101412012 120776 GAGE, NATHAUE 36:57 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298658 093012 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 36.57 364106 101412012 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 155.01 GASKET 00001240 298093 1324717 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 155.01 - 364107 101412012 103186 GERTENS- 53.44 TREE 00001136 298094 267331 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 53.44 364108 101412012 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 461.75 POOL BOILER REPAIRS 298609 108854 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 461.75 364109 101412012 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 250.00 STRIPING AT NORMANDALE PK 00001144 298437 12091 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00 354110 'i 1014/2012 101103 GRAINGER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKREG LOG20000 101412012 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 500.00 SPEAK UP, EDINA 298354 38553 9/28/2012 —1 D14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 403.46 PLATES, UTENSILS, CUPS 00005625-298467 9932426142 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 161.60 DEGREASER, BATTERY CHARGER 00006172 29861 D 9930196317 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 88.75 AIR FILTERS 00002213 298611 9919503954 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 570.46 COLD CATHODE LAMPS 00002200 298659 9920042414 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 213.92- RETURN 298660 9920998904 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,010.35 364114 101412012 364111 10/412012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 10 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 364112 101412012 120201 GRANICUS INC. 500.00 SPEAK UP, EDINA 298354 38553 1130.6124 295.01 OCT WEBSTREAMING 298355 38561 1130.6124 795.01 364113 101412012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 889.50 298383 144185 5662.5513 364.50 298506 144186 5842.5513 1,254.00 364114 101412012 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 12,700.00 2012 FINAL QUARTERLY PMT 298269 092512 5410.6132 12,700.00 364115 101412012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 76.13 MOWER PARTS 00001141 298438 113300 1641.6406 76.13 364116 101412012 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 117.46 THERMAL REGISTER TAPE 00007514 298095 111390 5822.6512 117.46 364117 1014/2012 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY 1,438.60 HVAC SERVICE 298612 160001666 7411.6103 1,438.60 364118 101412012 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,297.05 OCT 2010 PREMIUM 298363 6034605 -3 9900.2033.05 9.50 COBRA 298364 OCT 2012 1550.6043 5,306.55 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES MOWING 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 10/3/k -_ 8:27:42 Page - 11 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS CDBG REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 252.47 DISWASHER REPAIR 00006336 298425 30655020 CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTED REPAIRS R55CKREG LOG20000 252.47 364126 101412012 Council Check Register 9/28/2012 — 10/412012 298384 Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 364119 1014/2012 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB,, i 1,705.50 298386 618019 5842.5514 500.00 MINNETONKA FIELD FEE.' 298096 092012 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL . 617747 5862.5515 500.00. SIMMON'S MEMORIAL CHECK 298096 092012 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL ._ 617828 5862.5514 1,000.00 VERNON SELLING 3,737.50 364120 _1014/2012 103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY - HOUSING DE_ PART '. 364127 101412012 129748 .HOLLE, AMANDA 36,191.97 REHAB LOAN PAYBACK 298327 092512 2101.4205 FEDERALAID 091212 5310.6610 36,191.97 POOL ADMINISTRATION 22.48 364121 101412012 103838 HENNEPIN.TECHNICAL COLLEGE - 364128 101412012 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 806.80 PRE - EMPLOYMENT CPAT 298613 00273578 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 806.80 364122 101412012 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC. 1,995.00 SEWER REPAIR- 0001078E 298661, 13403 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING.INSPECTION 1,995.00 ` 364123 1014/2012 _ 102079. HIGHVIEW,PLUMBING,INC 3,500.00 SEWER REPAIR 0001079E 298662 13402 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,500.00 364124 101412012 103753 HILLYARD,INC- MINNEAPOLIS ` 421.97 FOAM WASH, MOPHEADS 00002216 298097 600401664 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 421.97 364125 101412012 100806. HOBART SERVICE 10/3/k -_ 8:27:42 Page - 11 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS CDBG REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 252.47 DISWASHER REPAIR 00006336 298425 30655020 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 252.47 364126 101412012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 729.50 298384 617808 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,051.50 298385 617746 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,705.50 298386 618019 5842.5514 COST OF.GOODS SOLD BEER . YORK SELLING 56.00 298507 617747 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 195.00 298508 617828 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,737.50 '. 364127 101412012 129748 .HOLLE, AMANDA I 22.48 PETTY CASH 298663 091212 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 22.48 - 364128 101412012 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,596.00 INSURANCE ADJUSTMENT 298426 092612 1550.6200 INSURANCE PRINTING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLUMBING PERMITS WEB DEVELOPMENT 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 12 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SVC PW BUILDING ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,596.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 364129 1014/2012 VERNON SELLING 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 550.78 EDINBOROUGH PARK BROCHURES 298614 31845 5710.6575 550.78 364130 10/412012 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 378.28 UNIFORM EXPENSE 298707 092812 1400.6203 378.28 364131 101412012 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 79.54 FROSTED LEMONADE 298098 1834544 5730.5510 79.54 364132 101412012 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 337.00 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS 298615 D241785 -IN 1470.6180 337.00 364133 101412012 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 3,460.02 MAIL WATER BILLS 298616 68401 5910.6103 3,460.02 364134 10/412012 128368. INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 527.15 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001195 298468 IN- 000223111 1552.6406 527.15 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001195 298468 IN-000223111 1260.6406 1,054.30 364135 1014/2012 127243 JACK PIXLEY SWEEPS INC. 122.60 PERMIT REFUND 245600 ED102329 1495.4112 122.60 364136 10/412012 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 4,150.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 298664 JJ5058 1130.6124 4,150.00 364137 10/4/2012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,683.68 298509 1905686 5842.5514 18.00 298510 1905685 5842.5513 56.35 298511 1905687 5842.5515 18.00 298512 1905681 5862.5513 3,329.50 298513 1905679 5862.5514 PRINTING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLUMBING PERMITS WEB DEVELOPMENT 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 12 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) CENT SVC PW BUILDING ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 1013/2012 827:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 9/28/2012 - 10/412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation POW Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 39.05 298688 1905677 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6,144.58 364138 101412012 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. \ 245.81 SPREADER 00001121 298099 62687342 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 203:78 WEED SPRAY 00001024 298100 62684193 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 449.59 364140 101412012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 41.98 298514 1398231 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,052.82 298515 1398230 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 988.88 298516 1398238 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,998.99 298517 1398233 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD`LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,152.89 298518 1398237 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,342.51 298519 1398240 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 298520 1398218 5862.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,012.32 298521 1398241 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,651.28 298522 1398235 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,013.38 298523 1398242 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 376.13 298524 1398239 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,774.52 298525 1398234 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .56 298526 1398212 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,696.16 298527 1398227 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,781.99 298528 1398224 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 903.48 298529 1389645 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 350.60 298530 1398216 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 740.14 298531 1398232 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,808.19 298532 1398228 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.37 298533 1398222 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,637.26 298534 1398221 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.90- 298535 548961 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE YORK SELLING 6.73- '298536 547966 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.92- 298537 547965 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORKSELLING 6.73- 298538 548502 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13.80- 298539 548501 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.90- 298540 548960 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.59- 298541 548499 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.70- 298542 548498 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.88- 298543 548500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,012.32 298689 1398229 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,301.78 298690 1398220 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,407.52 298691 1398215 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 370.76 298692 1398214 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 33,359.80 364141 10/412012 114049 JOHNSON, DICK 87.82 SENIOR GOLF BANQUET 298101 CENTERPIECES 1628.4392,02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 87.82 364142 10/412012 111018 KEEPRS INC. 81.58 UNIFORMS 00003840 298617 194652 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.99 00003791 298618 189911 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 243.77 00003843 298619 195970 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.89 00003560 298620 194595 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 385.85 00003843 298621 195782 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 834.08 364143 101412012 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 18.53 PETTY CASH 298439 092512 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 27.76 PETTY CASH 298439 092512 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 34.32 PETTY CASH 298439 092512 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 80.61 364144 101412012 129942 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 389.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298440 092812 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 389.72 364145 101412012 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 336.00 AUG - SEPT 2012 SERVICE 298102 092512 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 336.00 364146 101412012 130919 KOSS, RITA 69.00 CLASS REFUND 298422 092612 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 69.00 364147 10/412012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 22.20 WIRE 00005597 298356 9301110295 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 448.99 FITTINGS, WASHERS 00005613 298469 9301117582 1553.6530 - REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 86.45 AIR COUPLER 00005529 298470 9301113793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 557.64 364148 1014/2012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 347.78 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 298665 092812 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10/312012 8:27:42 Page - 15 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 162.00 FALL CLASS REFUND 298666 092512 5511.6136 CITY OF EDINA 162.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 364162 101412012 101483 MENARDS Council Check Register 102.86 LUMBER, HARDWARE 00001247 298103 5199 1646.6577 LUMBER 9128/2012 - 1014/2012 LUMBER, HARDWARE Check # Date Amount Supplies / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account. Description 298331 05133 347.78 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 72.04 HARDWARE 00001247 298441 364149 101412012 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101792 LUKE -TECH 78.84 LUMBER, SCREWS - 00001140 298442 5566 1646.6577 LUMBER 1,290.04 DIESEL 00006143 298328 2070570 5422.6581 GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 806.45 GAS 00006142 298329 2070569 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 45.66 972.97 GAS 00006142 298330 2070571 5422.6581 GASOLINE 615.94 1,265.83 GAS 00006142 298622 2109488 5422.6581 GASOLINE 100885 METRO SALES INC 1,214.38 DIESEL 00006143 298623 2109489 5422.6581 GASOLINE 298105 683.54 GAS 00006142 298624 2109487 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,233.21 364154 10/412012 102729 METROPOLITAN' FORD OF EDEN PRAI 364150 1014/2012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005634 298473 207358 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 52.81 PRESSURE STAT 00005628 298471 2124960 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 52.81 364151 101412012 128428 MARVIN, KRISTINE 10/312012 8:27:42 Page - 15 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 162.00 FALL CLASS REFUND 298666 092512 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 162.00 364162 101412012 101483 MENARDS 102.86 LUMBER, HARDWARE 00001247 298103 5199 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 100.61 LUMBER, HARDWARE 00001127 298104 5011 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 94.55 COAT & HAT HOOKS, DRILL BIT 00002218 298331 05133 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 72.04 HARDWARE 00001247 298441 5274 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 78.84 LUMBER, SCREWS - 00001140 298442 5566 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.94 GLOVES 00001190 298472 4523 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 85.44 BULBS 00001190 298472 4523 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 45.66 MULCH 00002193 298625 16096 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 615.94 364153 101412012 100885 METRO SALES INC 2,431.96 COPIER USAGE 298105 477719 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,431.96 364154 10/412012 102729 METROPOLITAN' FORD OF EDEN PRAI 3 047 83 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005634 298473 207358 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,047.83 364155 101412012 130914 MICKELSON, DAVID 85.00 REIMBURSE FOR FALL SEMINAR 298332 " 092512 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 ,. Council Check Register Page - 16' ' 9/28/2012 = 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger_ Account Description Business Unit 364156 101412012 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR& INDUSTRY 40.00 BOILER LICENSE - STATION 2 _ 298667 ABR00378081 1470.6260 LICENSES &PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 364157 101412012 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. ' 32.18 WINDOW CLEANING 298333 928002028 5861.6180 " CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 42.75 298334 928002027 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 10.69 = 298335 928002029 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 85.62 364158 101412012 i100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 22.00 < HANDICAP 298336 45- 0150 -13 -9/12 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 220.00 HANDICAPS :298337 45- 0150 -16 -9/12 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 242.00 364159 101412012 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 1,188.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASS 298626 629430 -2982 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 = 1,188.00 364160 101412012 112908 - MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 408.43 EMULSION 00001259-298668' 67859 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 408.43 364161 101412012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 10.69 . STAINLESS STEEL 00005572 ,298106 0096220 7IN 1553.6530 ,REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. _ 382.06 VALVE ASSEMBLY, GASKSETS 00005526 .298107 0096219 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 392.75 364162 101412012 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS &.SERVICE:GROUP 23.22 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005577 298474. 506861F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN P 23.22 364163 101412012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 381.91 HYDRAULIC MOTOR 00006349 298627 873900 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 381.91 364164 101412012 130910 • - MURPHY, JOANNE 25.00 PARKING PERMIT OVERPAYMENT 298338 092412 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 25.00 a 364165 101412012 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 211.00 298387 76146 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/312012 8:27:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/2812012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation .. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 806.50 298388 76141 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS "SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,017.50 364166 101412012 102551 -:NFPA 924.81 POSTERS, STICKERS .00003865 298628 5619782Y 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 924.81 364167 1014/2012 130227 NIKUNEN, JESSICA 170.60 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PURCHASES 298669 092812 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 170.60 364168 1014/2012 120235 NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE LLC 16.20 GAUZE 00003079 298629 IN110026 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16.20 364169 101412012 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 189.01 STEEL 00005387 298475 238758 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 350.12- CREDIT 00005373 298476 CM238716 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. - 22.91 STEEL 00005387 298477 238867 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.04 STEEL 00005415 298478 238963 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 381.29 STEEL 06005530 298479 242922 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343.13 364170 1014/2012 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 556.13 LIGHTSAR 00005286 298480 31025 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN j 556.13 364171 101412012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 8.88 PAPER 298339 1506950383 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 98.88 BATTERY, USB DRIVE, FLASH 298340 1507525662 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 107.76 364172 101412012 102712 OFFICE OF E_ NTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 23.80 298670 W12060656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING'MAINTENANCE d 23.80 298670 W12060656 1554.6188 TELEPHONE , CENT SERV GEN - MIS 47.60 298670 W12060656 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 47.60 298670 W12060656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING,MAINTENANCE 71.40 298670 W12060656 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 92.10 298670 W12060656 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.20 298670 W12060656 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 95.23 298670 W12060656 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 119.00 298670 W12060656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 18 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 142.80 298670 W12060656 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 163.52 298670 W12060656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 209.20 298670 W12060656 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 209.20 298670 W12060656 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 333.20 298670 W12060656 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 370.80 298671 W12060662 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.80 298672 W12070650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.80 298672 W12070650 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 42.84 298672 W12070650 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 47.60 298672 W12070650 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 47.60 298672 W12070650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.40 298672 W12070650 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 92.10 298672 W12070650 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.20 298672 W12070650 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 95.20 298672 W12070650 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 119.00 298672 W12070650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 142.80 298672 W12070650 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 162.94 298672 W12070650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 209.20 298672 W12070650 5760.6188, TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 209.20 298672 W12070650 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 333.20 298672 W12070650 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 370.87 298673 W12070656 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.80 298674 W12080655 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 23.80 298674 W12080655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.60 298674 W12080655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.60 298674 W12080655 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 47.60 298674 W12080655 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 71.40 298674 W12080655 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 92.10 298674 W12080655 5210.6188. TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.20 298674 W12080655 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 95.20 298674 W12080655 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 119.00 298674 W12080655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 142.80 298674 W12080655 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 162.96 298674 W12080655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 209.20 298674 W12080655 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 209.20 298674 W12080655 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 333.20 298674 W12080655 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 371.05 298675 W12080661 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 6.222.91 364173 101412012 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 R 55CKREG LOG20000 - Council Check Register Page - 19 9/28/2012 - 1014/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 230.80 CHAIN, RATCHET BINDER 00005627 298357 505210 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 230.80 364174 101412012 130927' OLSON, INEZ 66.03 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 298676. 5712 ZENITH AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET - 66.03 364175 1014/2012 101470 ORVIS, JOAN _ 9,346.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTION 298677 092512 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 9,346.00 _ 364176 101412012 - 130917 OWL ENGINEERING & EMC TEST LAB 750.00 T- MOBILE INTERMODULATION STUDY 298358 3239 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 750.00 364177 101412012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,130.50 298389 8367781 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,122.76 298390 8367784 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,436.83 298391 8367771 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 7,690.09 364178 1014/2012 .100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 3,975.00 INSTALL NEW WALKWAY- BRIDGE 00001147 298630 174 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 3,975.00 364179 1014/2012 119935 PET CROSSING 58.00 K9 EXAM 298631 122831 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 58.00 364180 1014/2012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 93.76 298392 2304709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 43.07 298544 2307978 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 347.10 298545 2307976 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 245.60 298546 2307975 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 317.78 298547 2307981 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 812.80 298548 2307982 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING " 1,099.11 298549 2307983 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.24 298550 2307984 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 70.77 298551 2307971 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,255.40 298552 2307980 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING :1 850.79 298553 2307977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 645.44 298554 2307974 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 20 9/2812012 - 1014/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 723.36 298555 2307089 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 957.70 298693 2307973 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 302.48 298694 2307972 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,879.40 364181 101412012 - 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 3,750.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE CLEANUP 298632 312458 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,750.00 364182 101412012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,335.27 TIRES 00005481 298481 210016299 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,864.47 TIRES 00005481 298482 210018208 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.41 TIRE 00005481 298483 210018653 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,837.40 TIRES 00005595 298484 210020484 1553.6563 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005595 298485 210021733 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.00 TIRE REPAIR 00005595 298486 210021768 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 526.30 TIRES 00005595 298487 210021728 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 296.72 TIRES, SCRAP CHARGE 00005595 298488 210022023 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 263.15 TIRES 00005595 298489 210022092 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005595 298490 210022585 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355.38 TIRES 00005595 298491 210022586 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.41 TIRE 00005595 298492 210023164 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,998.51 364183 10/4/2012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 190.00 PI PERMIT#376 298108 STANDARD 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 190.00 364184 10/4/2012 106152 POWERPLAN 481.63 FORESTRY TOOLS 00001138 298678 P80480 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 481.63 364185 1014/2012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,052.94 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002312 298443 5744 5765.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 1,052.94 364186 1014/2012 103094 PROTECTION ONE 184.05 SECURITY MONITORING 298633 #12743654 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 184.05 364187 101412012 114115 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT LLC 1,249.00 LASERIRADAR CERTIFICATION 298634 3515 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page- 21 GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE. MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 300.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 364190 101412012 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY Council Check Register CLEAR FLOOR DRAIN 298635 60125 5420.6180 9/2812012 - 1014/2012 136.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description' 1,249.00 364188 1014/2012 200.00 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 298341 092512 5710.6136 1,017.45 EMULSION 00001260 298679 3502 1301.6519 ROAD OIL 988.38 EMULSION 00001260 298680 3537 1301.6519 ROAD-OIL 2,005.83 2,289.00 FORKLIFT OPERATORS TRAINING 00005635 364189 101412012 92412 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 2,289.00 11.79- SAFETY BOOTS 298109 2680000000280 1301.6610. SAFETY EQUIPMENT 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS - 298109 2680000000280 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 161.79 SAFETY BOOTS 00005169 298493 2680000000255 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page- 21 GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE. MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 300.00 364190 101412012 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 136.00 CLEAR FLOOR DRAIN 298635 60125 5420.6180 136.00 364191 101412012 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 10/11/12 298341 092512 5710.6136 200.00 364192 101412012 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 2,289.00 FORKLIFT OPERATORS TRAINING 00005635 298494 92412 1281.6104 2,289.00 364193 101412012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 28.66 0402 23730 6935 0 298110 092012 1624.6406 28.66 364194 101412012 104788. SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 74.80 FOOD DRIVE STICKERS 298636 SH2O69 5862.6575 74.81 FOOD DRIVE STICKERS 298636 SH2O69 5822.6575 74.81 FOOD DRIVE STICKERS 298636 SH2O69 5842.6575 224.42 364195 101412012 130921 SCHAEFER, LISA 238.10 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298444 092112 1120.6107 4.00 PARKING FEE 298445. REIMBURSEMENT 1120.6107 29.97 USB DRIVES 298445 REIMBURSEMENT 1120.6406 272.07 364196 101412012 127049 SCHNEIDER, KATHERINE' 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page- 21 GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE. MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/28/2012 - 101412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 480.00 FITNESS TRAINING 298637 092412 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RENTAL OF PROPERTY INSURANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 480.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 364197 101412012 VERNON SELLING 100995 SEH VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 563.25 ANTENNA PROJECT 298359 260688 1001.4722 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 563.25 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 364198 101412012 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 604.50 SEPT PARTICIPANT FEES 298681 898420 1550.6200 604.50 364199 101412012 130909 SHINN, STEPHANIE 250.00 DEDUCTIBLE - CLAIM 298342 092512 1553.6180 250.00 364200 101412012 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 434.93 STAFF SHIRTS 298638 482704 7410.6406 434.93 364201 101412012 123471 SISTER KENNY GOLF PROGRAM 250.00 GREENS FEES REIMBURSEMENT 198192 102308 5401.4593 250.00 364202 1014/2012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 603.50 298393 1898243 5822.5513 151.96 298394 1917411 5862.5512 561.00 298395 1898248 5842.5513 1,365.14 298396 1917447 5862.5512 264.50 298397 1887165 5862.5513 1,301.50 298398 1898258 5862.5513 21.88 298556 1885370 5842.5512 1,389.00 298557 1887166 5842.5513 321.50 298558 1901648 5842.5513 3,011.00 298559 1898257 5842.5513 427.70 298560 1917445 5822.5512 2,259.97 298695 1917450 5842.5512 527.00 298696 1898256 5822.5513 12,205.65 364203 1014/2012 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 250.00 RECODE LOCKS 00005579 298495 121189 1553.6180 250.00 RENTAL OF PROPERTY INSURANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Page - 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364204 1014/2012 130640 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS IN 6,030.18 .HORNETS NEST ADA DESIGN 298639 29786 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 7,744.31 = CONSTRUCTION ADMIN - 298640 29785 5500.1705 CONSTRJN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 93,774.49 I , 364205 101412012 130710 SPRING, PAUL 50.00 8/23/12 PERFORMANCE 296237 ADDITIONAL. 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 56.00 364206 101412012 i 104672 SPRINT 4.62 298360 873184124.118 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 6.51 298360 873184124 -118 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 17.26 298360 873184124 -1.18 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES _ ELECTION - 34.44 298360 873184124 -118 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 40.11 .298360 873184124 -118 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.36 298360 873184124 -118 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 54.40_ 298360 873184124 -118 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 56.20 298360 873184124 -118 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 63.84 298360 873184124 -118 5720.6188 TELEPHONE - EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 80.43 298360 873184124 -118 1553.6188 TELEPHONE = EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.05 298360 873184124 -118 5422.6188 TELEPHONE : MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 100.17 298360 873184124 -118 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 140.28 298360 873184124 -118 1495.6188 TELEPHONE .; INSPECTIONS 184.43 298360 873184124 -118 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 195.21 298360 873184124 -118 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 345.87 298360 873184124 -118 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK•MAINTENANCE GENERAL 391.17 298360 873184124 -118 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 479.82 298360 873184124 -118 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 719.82 298360 873184124 -118 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,778.31 298360 873184124 -118 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,824.30 36420.7 101412012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 19.07 CO2 00001248 298111 S2610457.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 124.40 CAP ASSEMBLIES 00007700 298641 S2609019.001 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 143.47 364208 1014/2012 101015. STREICHERS 144.98 UNIFORM 00003083 298642 1959787 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 41.99 UNIFORM 298643 1960072 1400.6203. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 139.99 UNIFORM SHIRT CARRIER 298644 1960682 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 364215 101412012 10/312012 8:27:42 198.00 COBRA ADMIN Council Check Register IN111086 Page - 24 198.00 912812012 — 10/412012 113549 TENNIS WEST Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 699.99 BALL. VEST 298645 1960686 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 298345 00774156 69.98 PANTS, BELT 00003087 298646 1960747 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,096.93 364209 1014/2012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 51.05 HANDLE, BEZEL 00005578 298496 424189 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.05 364210 101412012 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 123.10 MERCHANDISE 298343 22980 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 123.10 364211 101412012 101910 SUNGARD PUBUC SECTOR INC. 611.47 WINDOWS SERVER EDITION 298709 54754 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 611.47 364212 101412012 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 340.43 LIQUID FERTILIZER 298647 5558 -RGR 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 340.43 364213 101412012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 2,428.00 298399 005867 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,320.00 298400 005946 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 942.00 298697 005971 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,690.00 364214 1014/2012 101027 TARGET BANK 152.62 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 298344 UTILITY KNIVES, 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION BATTERIES 152.62 364215 101412012 130357 TASC 198.00 COBRA ADMIN 298361 IN111086 1550.6103 198.00 364216 101412012 113549 TENNIS WEST 2,962.00 TENNIS COURT REPAIRS 00001036 298648 12- 007717 1647.6103 2,962.00 364217 1014/2012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 240.00 298345 00774156 5421.5514 3,030.20 298561 714682 5862.5514 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/312012 8:27:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ' Business Unit 111.25 298562 714683 5862.5515 COST OF:GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,381.45 364218 1014/2012 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 298346 2012 -70922 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 298346 2012 -70922 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 298346 2012 -70922 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 875.00 364219 10/412012 130920 TINATATI, ASH 53.00 CLASS REFUND 298423 092612 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 53.00 364220 101412012 129996 TOWEY, DEBRA 12.00 SUPER SUNDAY REFUND 298347 092412 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL - 12.00 364221 101412012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 185.15 ADAPTER, GASKET 00005571 298362 J165808 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 185.15 364222 101412012 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 307.00 BENTGRASS SEED 00002305 298446 28762 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 307.00 364223 1014/2012 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 810.00 RECERTIFICATION CLASSES 298682 092612 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 810.00 364224 101412012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. -476.76 TISSUE, TOWELS, CAN LINERS' 00001124 298112 249252 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ 524.10 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 298348 249323 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,115.54 TOWELS, TISSUE, LINERS, CUPS 298349 249310 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 48.09 CUP LIDS 298427 249310 -01 . 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 97.61 CAN LINERS, UTENSILS 298428 249321 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 343.07 LIQUOR BAGS 298428 249321 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,605.17 364225 1014/2012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 89.09 120V BOLT (HEATERS) 298649 6672260 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 89.09 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 26 9128/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364226 10/412012 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 147.21 GLOVES, EAR PLUGS, WIPES 00001128 298447 307322 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 147.21 364227 101412012 119454 VINOCOPIA 722.50 298401 0063598 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 75.38 298402 0063599 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 522.00 298563 0063675 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 529.00 298698 0063597 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,848.88 364228 101412012 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 1,750.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 298429 212029 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 1,750.00 364229 101412012 101075 WEIGLE, SUE 150.00 GOLF BANQUET PRIZES 298113 091912 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 150.00 364230 101412012 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 30.93 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 298650 092812 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 157.62 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 298650 092812 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 188.55 364231 101412012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,879.10 298403 310425-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 915.20 298404 310281 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 128.00- 298564 310162 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.00- 298565 310231 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 368.40 298699 310282 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,020.70 364232 101412012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 400.00 298405 424188 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15.88- 298406 58988 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,031.20 298566 425007 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,068.32 298567 425005 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,714.76 298568 425008 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 265.23 298569 425006 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 136.00 298700 425096 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,406.33 298701 425004 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 113.12- 298702 59024 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/312012 8:27:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit _ 8,892.84 364233 101412012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 921.70 298407 107130 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 91.51 298408 110820 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,039.87 298409 110818 5842.5512 COST OF, GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 146.20 298410 110815 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING . 5,084.82 298411 110814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,425.16 298412 110811 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,674.08 298413 110817 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ' 4.50- 298414 866854 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.91- CREDIT ON ACCT 298415 CUST 0939 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,220.49 298570 110821 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 341.00 298571 111758 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,625.58 298572 110816 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING _ 1,617.51 298573 112760 5942.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 114.20 298574 112761 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 181.15- 298575 856383 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34.53 298703 110813 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 639.50 298704 111759 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 65.96- 298705 869277 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.58- 298706 869086 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 24,699.05 364234 101412012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,157.80 298416 960101 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 298417 960103 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,510.20 298418 959554 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.00 298419 959206 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING _ 4,037.85 298420 959205 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 912.00 298576 962281 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,687.35 i 364235 101412012 105740 -WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,757,50 SOUTHDALE TRAFFIC STUDY 298114 2- 01686 -340 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 518.00 CL COFFEE SHOP TIS 298115 2- 01686 -310 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,730.50 SOUTHDALE PARKING STUDY 298116 2 -01686 -350 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 7,006.00 364236 10/4/2012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 91.85 51- 6050184 -2 298270 340733416 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 24.60 51- 8976004 -9 298271 340931455 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/2012 8:27:42 Council Check Register Page - 28 9/28/2012 - 10/4/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 8.69 51- 0193479 -4 298272 340798283 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 3,462.65 51- 9011854-4 298273 340929168 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 77.50 51- 9608462 -5 298274 340936720 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 25.92 51- 0194596 -8 298275 340633510 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 97.38 51- 9770164 -7 298276 340784137 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 20.09 51- 9770163 -6 298277 340791986 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 29.53 51- 0223133 -2 298278 340635073 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 22.65 51- 0160483 -1 298279 340633582 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 5,764.80 51- 9603061 -0 298280 340936447 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 35.61 51- 4420190 -3 298281 340863206 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 126.41 51- 8987646 -8 298282 340935854 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,216.95 51- 6644819 -9 298283 340898500 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 111.93 51- 9337452 -8 298284 340934776 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,203.83 51- 5107681 -4 298285 340871539 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 24.51 51- 8997917 -7 298286 340775819 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 30.03 51- 6541084 -2 298287 340745740 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,602.31 51- 4159265 -8 298651 340865375 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 22,977.24 364237 10/412012 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 240.00 WEB DESIGN 298117 2971 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 543.75 MOVIE MAKER 298118 3087 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 783.75 364238 101412012 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 117.90 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 298652 54069014 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 117.90 497,988.19 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 497,988.19 Total Payments 497,988.19 10/3/2012 8:28:19 Page - 1 We confirm to the best of.`our knowledge = and belief, that,these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City. of Edina purchasing' policips, 9nd procedures e red o �� CITY OF EDINA - R55CKSUM LOG20000 Council Check Summary 9/28/2012 - 10/412012 Company Amount' 01000 GENERAL FUND 160,929.94 02100 CDBG FUND 36,191.97 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,799.47 _ 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 274.29 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,600.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,681.22 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 325.58 _ 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 600.02 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,759.69 - 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 24,822.47 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 25,168.02 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,983.08 05800 LIQUOR FUND 156;382.33 05900 UTILITY FUND 42,542.04 . 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 8.69 - 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,622.33 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,297.05 Report Totals 497,988.19 10/3/2012 8:28:19 Page - 1 We confirm to the best of.`our knowledge = and belief, that,these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City. of Edina purchasing' policips, 9nd procedures e red o �� R55CKREG LOG20000 - CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 1 10/11/2012 - 10/1112012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364239 1011112012 100613 AAA 1,018.52 PLATES FOR 29 -122 298797 100212 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,018.52 364240 1011112012 124613 ABM JANITORIAL- NORTH CENTRAL . 2,782.41 OCT 2012 SERVICE 298710 4406302 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,782.41 -- 364241 1011112012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 151.60 299057 1618157 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 135.60 299058 1618163 5842.5515 COST'OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 287.20 - 364242 1011112012 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 450.66 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 288926 22515 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.66 364243 1011112012 102716 :ALLEGRA EDINA 132.95 HOTEL PASSES 298927 94805 5710:6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 132.95 364244 1011112012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 148.73 COFFEE 298928 156085 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 148.73 364245 10111/2012 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 64.98 298798 093012 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 101.08 298798 093012 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 132.88 298798 093012 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 135.48 298798 093012 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 142.60 298798 093012 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 249.78 298798 093012 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 366.96 298798 093012 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,193.76 364246 1011112012 130931 ANDERSON, JUDITH 21125 ART WORK SOLD_: 298779 100212 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 211.25 364247 10/1112012 119976 AP LAWN 490.25 WEED CONTROL 00002317 298979 CTLKPK912 5765.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROMENADE EXPENSES 490.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1019/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 2 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount. Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No' Subledger. Account. Description Business Unit 364248 10/1112012 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 483.03 FOOD 298711 1806556 • 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 483.03 364249 10/1112012 103709 ARM OF MINNESOTA 1,400.00 RECERTIFICATION CLASSES 299132 100812 1260.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,400.00 364250 10/1112012 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 31.26 CEILING, TILE 00001241 298929 10052506 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - POOL OPERATION _ 31.26 364251 10111/2012 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 151.57 GAS SPRINGS, STUDS 00005539 298930 10105671 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.90 CLUTCH ASSEMBLY 00005640 298931 10105293 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343.47 364252 10111/2012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.60 298817 100112 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 298817 100112 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 298817 100112 - 5111.6182 RUBBISH- REMOVAL ART CENTER- BLDG/MAINT 56.55 298817 100112 1645.6182 RUBBISH,REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 66.29 298617 100112 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 298817 100112. 1628.6182 RUBBISH.REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 298817 100112 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 90.08 298817 100112 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 298817 100112 5861.6182 RUBBISH, REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY . 207.79 298817 100112 1551.6182 RUBBISH' REMOVAL' CITY HALL GENERAL 211.25 298817 100112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL " 217.25 298817 - 100112 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 224.58 298817. 100112 5511.6182 RUB BISH.REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 233:31 298817 100112 1301.6182 RUBBISHAEMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE . 233.32. 298817 100112 1552.6162. RUBBISH: REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 301:74 298817 100112 .5311.6182 - RUBBI5H''REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 399.03 298617 100112 5420.6182 RUBBISH'REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 436.59 298817 '100112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 646.03 298817 100112 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS. 251.91 298980 10/1112 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,928.64 364253 10/1112012 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC,OF BLOOMINGTON I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # Date, Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ti Business Unit 267.13 'STARTER REPAIRS .- 00005304 298932 151987 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS. = EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 267.13 364254 1011112012 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC_ DESIGN 225.38 .BUSINESS CARDS 298712 490 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 225.38 364265 1011112012 120814 BAGGALLINI INC. 131.67 BAGS 298981 IVC00522731 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 'PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 131.67 364256 1011112012 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. - 2,216.05 ICE PAINT 298982 00090723 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 741.89 GOAL NET, PAD SUPPORT 00008083 298983 00090855 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 183.83 ICE PAINT 298984 00090844 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS . 3,141.77 364257 1011112012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION .. 152.15 298818 75288300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 384.05 298819 75288000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 675.35 298820 74534700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR ', VERNON SELLING 10.39 298821 87392400 5822.5515. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 295.66 299059 6253900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 114.49 299060 87423500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX - VERNON SELLING " 6.78 PRICING NUMBERS 299061 87423600 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 77.55 299062 75385000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING _ 91.55 299063 75386000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST.SELLING 28.53 299064 87424600 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS, SOLD MIX 60TH ST SELLING - 173.23 299065 87424500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD.MIX - YORK SELLING 388.65 299066 75385800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,282.00 299067 75385900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,680.38 • 364268 1011112012 117379 BENIE_K PROPERTY SERVICES INC. , 680.50 LAWN CARE 298985 139944 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 680.50 364259 1011112012 126847' BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 136.50 COFFEE 298986 1044582 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 136.50 364260. 1011112012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 4 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 278.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 298713 WO- 800900 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 99.77 CALCULATOR, INDEX 298714 WO- 800977 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 148.16 ENVELOPES, FOLDERS 298715 WO- 800880 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 216.07- RETURN 298716 CP- WO- 800900 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 310.21 364261 10/11/2012 130922 BI WORLDWIDE 126.00 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION AWARDS 298717 ME- 663771 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 126.00 364262 1011112012 127340 BIDDLE CONSULTING GROUP INC. 599.00 CRITICALL MAINTENANCE RENEWAL 298718 41709 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 599.00 364263 1011112012 124677 BORCHERT, SUE 17.00 WESTWOOD HILLS TRIP REFUND 298719 100212 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 17.00 364264 10/11/2012 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 110.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003883 298933 80891669 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,023.73 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003883 298987 80891668 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,133.93 364265 10/1112012 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 382.00 299068 110012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 382.00 364266 10111/2012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 18.90 GASKETS 00005582 298720 674699 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 512.23 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE KIT 00005582 298721 674270 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 531.13 364267 1011112012 130633 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE 160.07 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION LUNCH 298722 2040 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 160.07 364268 10/11/2012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 299055 100812 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 364269 10111/2012 102149 CALLAWAYGOLF 563.26. GOLF CLUBS 298988 923878860 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 10/912012 7:44:01 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 563.26 364270 1011112012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,119.15 298822 171182 5842.5514 _ COST OF:GOODS.SOLD BEER- YORK SELLING 82.35 298823 171183 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 832.25 298824 171184 5822.5514 COST_ OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,033.75 364271 - 1011112012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 809.00 298825 94548 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD YORK SELLING 809.00 364272 1011112012 129923. CAWLEY 14.95 NAME BADGE 298723 V123413 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 10.00 NAME BADGE 298989 V123920 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 21.11 NAME BADGES 298990 V123918 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 8.65 NAME BADGE 298991 V123919 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 54.71 364273 10/1112012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 163.40. ENVELOPES 298724 70547 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 163.40 364274 1011112012 123898 CENTURYLINK 327.76 952 927 -8861 298725 8861 -9/12 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 56.38 952 929 -0297 298726 0297 -9/12 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 40.82 952922 79246 298727 9246 -9/12 1400.6188 ,TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.93 952 831 -0024 288728 0024 -9/12 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 546.91 364275 10/1112012 130933. CHAPEK, STEPH 90.00 VOLLEYBALL CLINICS 298934 CLINICIAN 4077.6103-- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 90:00 364276 10111.12012 119725 _CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 343.00 298826 483816 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 281.30 299069 483721 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 624:30 364277 1011112012 118580 CITY OF EDINA 139,469.21 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. 298729 PAMELA PARK 4409.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS . PAMELA PARK SA PREPAYMENT _ 139,469.21 R55CKREG LOG20000 122.75 CITY OF EDINA 299070 1694 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 122.75 10/11/2012 -10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 364278 10/1112012 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 251.40 299071 450.00 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 298992 COM1256 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 450.00 364279 1011112012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 1011112012 120433 COMCAST 209.53 00113607- 0170005201 298935 170005201 -9/12 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER 209.53 8772 10 614 0177449 298993 177449 -9/12 364280 10/1112012 CLUB HOUSE 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 90.85 8772 10 614 0164959 298994 216.35 JACK PINS 00005559 298936 146495 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 216.35 8772 10 614 0165667 298995 165667 -9/12 364281 10/11/2012 RANGE 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 269.83 101912012 7:44:01 Page- 6 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.75 299070 1694 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 122.75 364282 10/11/2012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 251.40 299071 0188088711 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 251.40 364283 1011112012 120433 COMCAST 96.52 8772 10 614 0177449 298993 177449 -9/12 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 90.85 8772 10 614 0164959 298994 164959 -9/12 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 82.46 8772 10 614 0165667 298995 165667 -9/12 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 269.83 364284 1011112012 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 125.00 CONTRACT ADMIN 101 299133 100812 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 125.00 364285 1011112012 114283 COMPAR INC. 85,363.20 TOUGHBOOK SERVICE AGREEMENIF0003038 298937 IN2006 -1 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 85,363.20 364286 10/1112012 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 354.81 STAFF T- SHIRTS 298938 16313 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 354.81 364287 1011112012 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 282.82 DAIRY 298996 092412 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 282.82 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 7 364291 1011112012 102831. DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 162.25 651972955 298940 651972955 -9112 5710.6122 820.63 110311893 298998 110311893 -9112 5410.6122 982.88 364292 1011112012 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,660.18 REFUSE 298999 1431748 3,688.20 299000 1427066 7,368.38 364293 10/1112012 125188 EDINA ART.CENTER 4095.6103 4095.6103 42.86 BOOK BY BARBARA LAVALLOUR 299037 EDINA SCULPTURE 1551.6406, 42.86 364294 10/1112012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 SEPT CHAMBER MEETING 298799 32388 25.00 364295 10111/2012 100049 EHLERS 2,55000 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 298733 63343 - 1,975.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 298734 63335 4,525.00 9232.6106 3301.6103 3301.6103 ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET.RUBBISH CITY HALL GENERAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT PIR DS REVENUES PIR DS REVENUES 10/11/2012- - 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. Business Unit 364288 10/11.12012 -. 102478_ ,DAY DISTRIBUTING, CO. 1,391.40 298827 670881 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 982.55 298828 670880 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,218.30 298829 670879 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,896:00 298630 669816 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ' 6,488.25 364289 1011112012 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT, 154.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298939 100412 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 154.85 364290 1011112012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 79.87 BAKERY 298730 427914 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 104.49 298731 .428024 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.32 298732 428025 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 42.96 298997 428745 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 364291 1011112012 102831. DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 162.25 651972955 298940 651972955 -9112 5710.6122 820.63 110311893 298998 110311893 -9112 5410.6122 982.88 364292 1011112012 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,660.18 REFUSE 298999 1431748 3,688.20 299000 1427066 7,368.38 364293 10/1112012 125188 EDINA ART.CENTER 4095.6103 4095.6103 42.86 BOOK BY BARBARA LAVALLOUR 299037 EDINA SCULPTURE 1551.6406, 42.86 364294 10/1112012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 SEPT CHAMBER MEETING 298799 32388 25.00 364295 10111/2012 100049 EHLERS 2,55000 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 298733 63343 - 1,975.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 298734 63335 4,525.00 9232.6106 3301.6103 3301.6103 ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET.RUBBISH CITY HALL GENERAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT PIR DS REVENUES PIR DS REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS Council Check Register REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 364296 1011112012 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 122.38 MANAGEMENT FEE 298735 093012 1550.6155 122.38 364297 1011112012 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 488.82 WEAR RINGS 00001104 298736 0048170 -IN 5921.6530 488.82 364298 1011112012 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 192.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003732 298941 1498916 1470.6510 192.00 364299 10111/2012 130935 ENERGY MISERS LLC 19,654.00 EEEP IMPROVEMENT -5034 FRANCE 298942 PROGRESS PMT1 4414.6103 19,654.00 364300 10/11/2012 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,812.00 SEPTEMBER BILLINGS 299041 100312 1470.6103 6,812.00 364301 1011112012 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 100.50 299129 125 -1881 5822.5515 100.50 364302 1011112012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 75.87 . FVP 35 00005594 298737 69- 078860 1553.6530 93.89 GEAR LURE 00005632 298800 69- 079369 1553.6530 59.09 TIRE REPAIR KIT 00005643 298943 1- 3998989 1553.6530 53.91 FILTER ELEMENT 00005594 298944 69- 078978 1553.6530 16.03- CREDIT 298945 1- 3999279 1553.6530 266.73 364303 10/1112012 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 133.71 PUNCH SET 298816 MNTC2113722 1301.6556 556.66 WRENCHES, TOOL CARRIER 00001275 299042 MNTC2113684 1301.6406 690.37 364304 1011112012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 549.31 METER 00001281 298738 S01393252.001 5917.6406 549.31 364305 1011112012 103985 FLOR, JON Subledger Account Description BANK SERVICES CHARGES REPAIR PARTS FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page- 8 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA EMERALD ENERGY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page - 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 50TH8.FRANCE MAINTENANCE 364307 1011112012 101475 FOOTJOY 867.29 ' CITY OF EDINA 208.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 298740 4586158 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council' Check Register MERCHANDISE 298741 4584690 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012' COST OF GOODS -- PRO SHOP Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 50.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 298739 2317 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50.00 MERCHANDISE 299002 4599653 - 364306 10/1112012 105072 FLYNN, MARY, PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 30.00 PARKING:PERMIT REFUND 299038 100812 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS -. 36.00 REPAIR PARTS 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page - 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 50TH8.FRANCE MAINTENANCE 364307 1011112012 101475 FOOTJOY 867.29 ' 208.72 SHOES 298740 4586158 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 284.93 MERCHANDISE 298741 4584690 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 306.25 SHOES 299001 4593804 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS' PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6739 MERCHANDISE 299002 4599653 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF RANGE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 867.29 364308 10/1112012 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 57.73 REIMBURSEMENT 298780 092812 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.73 364309 1011112012 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 336.74 AUTO PARTS 299043 093012 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 336.74 364310 1011112012 119737 GLOCK INC. 617.95 MISC. GUN ITEMS 00003069 298742 711492 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 617.95 364311 10111/2012 130052 GLOWSHOT�TARGETS-LLC- 234.67 TARGETS 299003 43 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 268.20 299004 174 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 502.87 364312 10111/2012 101103 GRAINGER - - 174.65 VALVES, FITTINGS 00001244 298743 9932028500 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.63 BATTERIES 00005639 298801 9938347086 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 48.97 MOTOR 299005 9941383672 7412.6530 REPAIR PARTS 240.25 364313 1011112012 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE B AUTO - CAHILL 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005644. 298947 42214 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 54.95 364314 1011112012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF RANGE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 10 10/11/2012 — 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 356.50 298831 144456 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 142.25 298832 144462 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 498.75 364315 1011112012 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 145.97 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 298948 100312 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 145.97 364316 1011112012 120834 GREEN, RICK 158.72 OUTDOOR FALL DISPLAY 299006 100412 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 158.72 364317 10/1112012 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 4,947.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 299007 100412 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 4,947.00 364318 10111/2012 119985 GRINNELL, MARGIE 260.00 ART WORK SOLD 298781 100212 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 260.00 364319 1011112012 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,194.52 OCT PREMIUM 299044 606005578 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,194.52 364320 10/1112012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,583.84 CHEMICALS 00005243 298744 3389189 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,642.29 CHEMICALS 00005243 298745 3389216 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,226.13 364321 10/11/2012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES _ 298746 024137 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 364322 1011112012 128208 HEINZMAN, DAN 32.89 UNIFORM PURCHASE 298802 100212 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 32.89 364323 10/1112012 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 298747 QB21228 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 364324 1011112012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 11 10/11/2012 — 10/11/2012 Check # . Date Amount Supplier l Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description : Business Unit 661.69 SEPT BOOKING FEES '298949 1000020912 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 661.69 364325 1011112012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 298950 1000020849 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING-- POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 298951 1000020850 1190.6105 DUES B SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 320.62 364326 1011112012 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 95.00 VEHICLE INSPECTOR'RECERT 00005638 298748 00273793 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 95.00 364327 1011112012 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY - 2,318.68 PCS 00004370 298952 51813601 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,318.68 . 364328 1011112012 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 87:09 WAND 00002219 298953 700047728 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES, EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.09 L 364329 1011112012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. . 2,122.40 298833 618934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,250.00 298834 618649 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD, BEER VERNON SELLING 870.50 299072 618755 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,242.90 364330 1011112012 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 192.30 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS 298954 D242080 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - - 192.30 _ 364331 1011112012 - 101468 IIMc 210.00 DUES - DEBRA'MANGEN - 298955 #6555 1120.6105 DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 210.00 364332 1011112012 - .108618> JEFFERSON FIRE`& SAFETY INC. ' 3,717.21 TURNOUT GEAR 00003882 298956 190230 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3;717.21 — 364333 1011112012 102146 JESSEN PRESS 10,424.00 AUTUMN ABOUT TOWN 299008 34571 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS. 10,424.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 12 10/1112012 - 10111/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 364334 10/11/2012 121075 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 454.75 SERVICE FOR ARTS FESTIVAL 454.75 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00002315 299009 58105 5761.6182 Subledger Account Description RUBBISH REMOVAL Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 364335 10/1112012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,092.10 298835 1905721 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 41.80 298836 1905722 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,297.10 298837 1905676 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 90.60 299010 1940806 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 95.95 299073 1890179 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 35.10 299074 1905733 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,557.85 299075 1905732 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 16,210.50 364337 1011112012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,945.03 298838 1398226 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,012.32 298839 1398219 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,963.36 298840 1398213 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,436.05 298841 1403491 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .28 298842 1403475 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 298.86 298843 1403495 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,682.25 298844 1403493 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 490.84 298845 1403477 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,787.41 298846 1403492 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,688.90 298847 1403494 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,073.56 298848 1403490 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 118.59 298849 1403489 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 701.20 298850 1398217 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON.SELLING 4,066.97 298851 1398236 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 166.24 298852 1399535 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,590.75 298853 1398211 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 731.74 298854 1398225 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,801.87 298855 1398223 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 55.13- 298856 549375 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 299076 1403482 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 631.08 299077 1404740 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 703.24 299078 1403488 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,414.70 299079 1403484 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 99.12 299080 1404739 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,676.10 299081 1403486 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,584.72 299082 1403485 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _ YORK SELLING 1,378.60 299083 1403487 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 280.48 3,563.64 1;004.64 2,854.14 779.65 415.32 335.87 1,248.97 8.42- 35.84 364338 CITY OF EDINA 102047 KLITZKE, PAUL Council Check Register 10/11/2012 -10/11/20.12 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - 299084 1403476 5842.5513 299085 1403483 5842.5513 •299086 1403473 5822.5513 '299087 1403478 5822.5513 299088 1403480 5822.5513 299089 1403481 i 5822.5512 299090 1403479 5822.5512 299091 1403474 5822.5512 299092 549930 5822.5513 299093 549206 5842.5512 299094 549637 5842.5512 364338 10/1112012 102047 KLITZKE, PAUL 125.00 PIANO TUNING, 299011 27459 125.00 364339 10111/2012 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 124.56 REPAIRS TO TRACTOR 00002094 299012 248385 124.56 364340 1011112012 118780 LAWNS R US INC. 7,314.00 RESEEDING 299134 W 79TH ST 7,314.00 364341 1011112012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 19.21 FITTINGS 00005613 298749 9301124709 575.02 ADAPTERS, BITS, SCREWS 00005531 298750 9301124708 104.26 CARB & CHOKE CLEANER 00001055 298803 9301052699 669.20 RODS, TUBING 00005637 298804 9301138765 1,367.69 364342 1011112012 103396 LENT, WILLIAM 470.70. FIELD TRIP EXPENSES 298957 FALL 2012 470.70 364343 1011112012 117681 LINDSTROM EMBROIDERY INC. 590.97 UNIFORMS 00003890 298958 6928 590.97 364344 10111/2012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 893.49 298857 139785 5420.6406 5761.6180 01367.1705.21 1553.6530 1553.6530 1301.6406 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD, WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 101912012 7:44:01 Page - 13 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier [Explanation PO #.:. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,287.19 299095 140251- 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,180.68 364345 10/1112012 129667 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 3,337.50 MILLING BITS 00001274 299045 8657 1301.6406 1,678.80 PRO LASERWELD SEGMENTS 00001274 299046 8656 1301.6519 GENERAL SUPPLIES ROAD OIL REPAIR PARTS SENIOR TRIPS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,016.30 SEWER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 364346 1011112012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 73.69 COLLAR 00005575 298805 2124964 1553.6530 73.69 364347 10/1112012 124778 MADOLE, MARY JANE 65.00 SENIOR TRIP REFUND . , 298959 100112 1628.4392.07 65.00 364348 1011112012 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 800.00 DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT 298960 8083 1400.6103 800.00 - 364349 1011112012 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 34.97 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 299047 100512 1240.6107 34.97 364350 10/1112012 101483 MENARDS 8:43 LUMBER 00001143 298806 5819 1646.6577 8.43 364361 1011112012 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME - 353,674.67 SEWER SERVICE 299013 0001000352 5922.6302 353,674.67 364352 10/1112012 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDENPRAI 75.35 FLOOR MATS 00005305 298807-.., 481900. "1553.6530 - 75.35 364353 10/1112012 124204- METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 10/3112 299014 100512 5410.6103 300.00 364354 10/1112012 104650 MICRO CENTER - 32.05 IPAD ACCESSORY 00004368 298961 4073408 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ROAD OIL REPAIR PARTS SENIOR TRIPS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 15 10/11/2012 — 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation.,- PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 32.05 , 364355 1011112012 127639 MIDWAY FORD 15,042.55 FORD FOCUS 00003777 298962 91382 421495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT 15,042.55 364356: 10/1112012 101161 MIDWEST. CHEMICAL SUPPLY 470.41 TOWELS, CAN LINERS, TISSUE 00003889 298963 31478 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 470.41 364357_ 1011112012 102582 .MINN DEPT OF LABOR &INDUSTRY . 50.00 BOILER INSPECTION 298964 ABR00540141 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES -CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50.00 364358 1011112012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,102.50 IRRIGATION CONDUIT 00001280 298751 34200 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS. DISTRIBUTION 2,450.00 GATE VALVE REPAIR 00001280 298752 34199 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS' `' DISTRIBUTION 3,552.50 364359 10/1112012 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 31,160.70 WATER PURCHASE 298753 431 - 0005.300 -10 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION /12 31,160.70 364360 1011112012 112908 -MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. ` 750.80 EMULSION 00001259 298754 68065 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 750.80 364361 - 1011112012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 107.94 RING, SHOP SUPPLIES 00005538 298808 0096343 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 176.34 BACKPACK SPRAYER 00002307 299015 0096300 -IN 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 284.28 ' 364362 1011112012 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 321.39 PRINT UTILITY'BILL STUFFERS 00001282 298755 12072 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 38.34 AUTHORS STUDIO POSTERS' 298756 11951 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 359.73 { 364363 10/1112012 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 83.73 SENSOR KITS 00005664 298809 507017F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 16 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # ^Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 364364 10/1112012 102976 NASH FINCH COMPANY 1,705.47 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 299039 ACCT# 350025480 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,705.47 364365 10/1112012 130934 N- FLATABLES 2,137.14 JUMPER FOR GREAT HALL 298946 ORDER 77432 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,137.14 364366 1011112012 130932 NORTHERN CYLINDER HEADS 40.90 CYLINDER HEAD REBUILD 00001276 298810 353 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.90 364367 10/1112012 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 136.83 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003885 299016 900153041 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 136.83 364368 10111/2012 127377 NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL 15.00 RENEWAL - BENNEROTTE 299130 100512 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 15.00 RENEWAL - DENFELD 299130 100512 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 15.00 RENEWAL - MARTIN 299130 100512 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 15.00 RENEWAL - GILGENBACH 299130 100512 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 EXPLORING POST 3411 299130 100512 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 364369 10/1112012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 76.15 OIL PAINTS 00009060 299048 42636800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 76.15 364370 10/11/2012 122129 NPELRA 150.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES -LISA SCHAEFER 298782 32515 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 150.00 364371 10/1112012 105575 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO. INC 1,800.18 AR &LE ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 299017 25773 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 1,800.18 364372 10/11/2012 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 153.00 298858 876 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 153.00 364373 10/1112012 103576 OFFICE DEPOT 82.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009203 299049 1508635336 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO " CITY OF EDINA 10/912012 7:44:01 . R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 10/11/2012 —10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 82.55 364374 1011112012. 121444 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STA 120.00 NOTARY COMMISSION -AMY BACHLER 298783 FEE 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120:00 364375 1011112012 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,868.80 PLAY STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE 298965 2309 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,868.80. 364376 1011112012 129470 PALMER PRINTING 927.93 GOLF SCORECARDS 00002314 299018 122445 -01 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 927.93 364377 1011112012 129485 PAPCOINC. -- 76.81 BRUSH HEAD, TISSSUE 299019 74014 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 74.77 TOWELS 299020 74126 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES. PSTF OCCUPANCY 151.58 364378 10/11/2012 100347 PAUSTIS &SONS 3,210.12 298859 8368977 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,389.69 298860 8368988 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF, GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING " 589.87 299096 8368986 -IN 5822.5513. COST OF GOOD&SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,189.68 364379 10/1112012 126492 PAYPALINC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 298784 19330199 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 364380 1011112012 - 106945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,248.68 299021 07145140 5520.5510 COST. OF GOODS.SOLD - °.. ARENA CONCESSIONS 326.20 299022 07145139 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ' GRILL - 425.90 299097 07067029 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,000.78 364381 10/1112012 130929 PFLAUMER, JOYCE 230.00 CLASS REFUND 298785 106212 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 230.00 364382 1011112012 160743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,379.68 298861 2311639 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 1,839.51 298862 2311631 5862.5513 COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 10111/2012 . CITY OF EDINA 101138 PLEAA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register 190.00 Page - 18 298786 100212 10/11/2012 -10/11/2012 190.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1.12 298863 2311630 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,402.93 298864 2311637 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 212.31 298865 2311641 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 451.12 298866 2311638 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,484.32 298867 2307979 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 299098 2311627 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 315.99 299099 2311632 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 906.58 299100 2311626 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 685.44 299101 2311633 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,488.70 299102 2311634 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 200.00 299103 2311927 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,932.58 299104 2311635 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,866.97 299105 2311629 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 790.61 299106 2311636 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 299107 2311628 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 364383 1011112012 100119 PING 132.65 PUTTER 132.65 364384 10/1112012 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 256.00 299023 11486003 5440.5511 299108 16535 299109 16536 364385 10111/2012 101138 PLEAA 190.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 298786 100212 190.00 364386 10/1112012 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 299024 3354099 46.30 364387 10/1112012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 565.58 TIRES 00005595 298966 210024605 565.58 364388 10/1112012 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 592.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 299040 100812 592.25 5862.5515 5842.5515 1400.6104 7411.6103 1553.6583 4077.6103 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY TIRES & TUBES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10111/2012 -10111/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No ` 364389 1011112012 .130928 RIEGERT, BILL 137.50 CLASS REF,UND�' 298787 100212 5101.4607 137.50 - 364390 1011112012 130930 - ROLLOFF, MARY. ANN 178.75 ART WORK SOLD 298788 100212 5101.4413 178.75 364391 1011112012 130936 SCHAFER, APRIL 28116 UTILITY ACCOUNT REFUND, .299131 .: 5525 ZENITH AVE 5900.2015 281.16 364392 10/1112012 102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC. 986.93 LABELS - 00003888 298967 192996 -01 1470.6406 986:93 364393 1011112012 101666 SHRED4T USA MINNEAPOLIS 22.30 DOCUMENT.SHREDDING 298789 8120012919 1400.6406 22.30 364394 10111/2012 120784 SIGN PRO . 1,763.44 ICE LOGOS 299025 5956 5521.6406 1,763.44 364395 10/11/2012 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 109.94 CAPS TO SELL 299026 483291 7410.6406 .109.94 364396 10/1112012 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 4,609.00 4TH QTR OPERATING FEES 299050 6823 1470.6221 6,229.00 4TH QTR OPERATING FEES 299050 6823 1400.6221 10,838.00 364398 10111/2012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 4,705.11 298868 1892951 5842.5513 96.50 298869 1940606 5842.5513 6,812.05 298870 1917451- 5842.5512 86.25 298871 1917519 5842.5512 2,279.20 298872 1917480 5842.5512 1,394.00 298873 1898260 5822.5513 750.09 298874 1892950 5822.5513 587.55 298875 1917446 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description CLASS REGISTRATION ARTWORK SOLD CUSTOMER REFUND GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES' RANGE RENTAL RANGE RENTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page - 19 Business Unit- - ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ICE MAINT PSTF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG L_OG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/1112012 - 10/1112012 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Page - 20 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 89.00 298876 1901647 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,698.08 298877 1898263 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,977.51 298878 1892952 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 353.00 298879 1940605 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 216.00 298880 1917481 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,063.20 298880 1917481 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,826.18 298881 1917448 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,306.06 298882 1917511 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 226.30 298883 1901653 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 554.44 299110 1917512 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 244.65 299111 1917487 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 200.50 299112 1940618 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 351.89 299113 1917486 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,880.35 299114 1917513 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 144.50 299115 1901669 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 32,842.41 364399 1011112012 105152 SPAIN, MARK - PW 189.51 UNIFORM PURCHASE 298968 092812 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 189.51 364400 1011112012 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 3,400.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001843 298757 1221 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 944.40 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 298758 1220 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,344.40 364401 10/1112012 129745 ST LOUIS PARK DQ GRILL AND CHI 17.99 BIRTHDAY PARTY CAKE 298969 591 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 17.99 364402 10/1112012 101015 STREICHERS 2,357.76 TRAINING AMMO 00003061 298759 1960760 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,357.76 364403 1011112012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 22.11 CAP 00005665 298811 425478 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.11 364404 10/1112012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 59.95 PUBLISH NOTICE 298790 1399765 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 47.96 PUBLISH NOTICE 298791 1399766 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 92.92 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -17 298792 1401082 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 ' Council Check Register Page - 21 10/11/2012 - —10/11/2012 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # — Doc No Inv No - Account No . Subledger Account Description Business Unit 200.83 364405 1011112012 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 287.98 FREIGHT.CHARGES ON INV.54057 298793. 56218 . 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 .287.98 - 364406 1011112012 _ 120998 SURLY BREWING CO: - 1,004.00 298884 006198 5862.5514 COST. OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,190.00 298885 006151 5842.5514 COST OF GOODVSOLD BEER YORK SELLING 920.00 299116 006275 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,114.00 364407 1011112012 120602 TEAGUE;,CARY. - 211.62 CONFERENCE LODGING 298760 100212 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 211.62 364408 1011112012 - 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,510.50 298886 715891 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 180.00- 299027 00774215 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,330.50 364409 10/1112012 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 14,607.72 MEDIA UPGRADE 299051 637592 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 14,607.72 364410 10/1112012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE'SECRETARIAL 200.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 9118/12 298794 M19336 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 126.25 ..BOARD MEETING MINUTES 299052 M19354 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 326.25 364411 1011112012 103277• TITAN MACHINERY 10,272.25 UTILITY TRAILER 00005288 298970 15260 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT. REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 10,272.25 ` 364412 1011112012 101474 TITLEIST 1,328.87 GOLF BALLS 299028 0961256 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -'PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 219.68 GOLF BALLS 299029 0975971 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,548.55 364413 1011112012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 29.59 OXYGEN 00001179 298761 108846 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 40.68 WELDING CYLINDERS 299030 449071 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 22 10/11/2012 —10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.27 364414 10/1112012 130066 TRUSIGHT 6,000.00 COMPENSATION PROJECT 299053 215995 4412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMP STUDY PROJECT 6,000.00 364415 10/1112012 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 74.80 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 299031 101970510 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.80 364416 1011112012 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 650.36 FILTERS 00008082 299032 0518755 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 650.36 364417 10/1112012 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 3,180.82 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 00005643 298971 377188 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,180.82 364418 10/11/2012 103048 U.S. BANK 900.00 TRUSTEE FEE 298763 3223562 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 900.00 364419 10/1112012 101049 UHL COMPANY 386.00 HVAC REPAIRS 298972 15095 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 386.00 364420 10/11/2012 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 9.67 SHIP SAMPLES 00001115 298762 TRAN:8932 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 9.67 364421 10/1112012 101908 US FOODS 81.04 FORKS, TRAYS 299033 093012 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 332.70 DETERGENT, GLASS CLEANER 299033 093012 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 2,230.36 FOOD 299033 093012 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,644.10 364422 1011112012 100050 USPS - HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #79583 299056 100812 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,000.00 364423 10/11/2012 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,118.00 WATERLINE REPAIRS 298973 18117 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION i CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 R55CKREG LOG20000 - Council Check Register Page - 23 10/11/2012 - 10111/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,118.00 i 364424 10/1112012 105910 VAN METER'& ASSOCIATES INC. 250.00 INV 00 -16122 298795 TRAINING 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 INV 00- 16121 298795 TRAINING 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 500.00 364425 10/1112012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1;210.00 GOLF CART RENTAL 00006016 298764 64762 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 1,210.00 364426 10111/2012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 946.50 FUSES, COIL 00001254 298813 6721726 _ 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 946.50 364427 1011112012 119454 VINOCOPIA 189.50 298887 0063894 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 189.50 364428 10/1112012 - 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 434.24 BULBS 00005629 298974 15212028 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 434.24 364429 10/1112012 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 267.19 JURIED SHOW PROGRAMS 299054 52543 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 267.19 364430 10111/2012 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 58.53 HANDLES 00005663 298814, 608701 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 11.33 HANDLES 00005583 298975 608574 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 69.86 364431 1011112012 129240 ,WARNACUT, MARCELLA - 53.99 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT .264266 060911 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 53.99 364432 1011112012 (130674 WATSON COMPANY 342.31 CONCESSION PRODUCT 299034 817856 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 313.44 299035 818075 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ` ARENA CONCESSIONS - 655.75 " 364433 1011112012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/2012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 24 10/1112012 - 10111/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 805.20 298888 311072 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 911.85 298689 311065 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,177.00 298890 311063 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 328.40 299117 311275 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,222.45 364434 10/1112012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 406.72 298891 425484 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 265.12 298892 425995 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 779.20 298893 425993 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 917.15 299118 425991 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 494.16 299119 425992 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,237.91 299120 425994 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,100.26 364435 10/11/2012 117482 WINECONNECTINC. 159.24 WEB - OCT 2012 298765 1024 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 364436 10/1112012 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 1,592.50 FERTILIZER 00002316 299036 000058157623 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,592.50 364438 10/1112012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 4,268.50 298894 113403 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,509.96 298895 114675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,383.25 298896 113404 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,910.45 298897 110812 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,890.29 298898 114672 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,828.80 298899 114674 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 743.45 298900 112759 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,087.23 298901 112758 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,336.20 298902 113407 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 127.15 298903 113406 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 883.21 298904 114676 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 165.27 298905 114679 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,882.16 298906 114678 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,181.41 298907 114680 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,220.30 298908 113408 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,995.60 298909 110819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,883.98 298910 113409 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,507.95 298911 113411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/912012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 25 - 10/11/2012 -10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41.10 298912 114682 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,043.19 298913 114681 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.10 299121 116330 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 669.45 299122 116329 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 79.92 299123 109395 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,400.78 299124 114677 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING . 98.77 299125 114673 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 79,195.47 - 164439 10/11/2012 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 119.20. 298766 962038 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 413.90 298767 962082 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,419.80 298914 962662 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,956.81 298915 962294 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 136.50 298916 962295 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 48.00 298917 962296 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,632.00 298918 960102 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 51943:27 298919 962280 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 72.00 298920 962034 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 298921 962033 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,698.10 298922 962032 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,581.60 298923 963250 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 240.00 298924 963252 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 I 298925 963251 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,292.56 299126 965359 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 96.00 299127 965127 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,514.10 299128 965126 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 29,206.84 364440 10/1112012 118395 WITMER'PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 355.89 TURNOUT SUSPENDERS 00003844 298976 E997905 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 355.89 364441 1011112012 101726 XCEL ENERGY . 17.89 51- 8102668 -0 298768 341288753 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 165.82 51- 5938955 -6 298769 341425405 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 1,881.83 51- 9013604 -6 298770 341783437 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER DISTRIBUTION 1,008.59 51- 5847121 -5 298771 341736789 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR - 21.08 51- 7567037 -0 298772 341602842 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 28.48 51- 6692497 -0 298773 341081290 1460.6185 LIGHT& POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 16,711.75 298774 341229687 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 411.59 51- 6046826 -0 298775 341427263 5422.6185 LIGHT &POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 101912012 7:44:01 Council Check Register Page - 26 10/11/2012 - 10/11/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 628.27 51- 9251919-0 298776 341307534 5765.6185 LIGHT &'POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 18.71 51- 4151897 -6 298777 341555067 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE = 7,968.83 51- 6955679 -8 298778 341635262 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 17.28 51- 5634814.2 298815 341577544 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 28,880.12 364442 1011112012 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 202.48 SEPT USAGE -PARK & REC 298796 064083550 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 98.11 COPIER USAGE 298977 064083625 1628.6103 / PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 300.59 364443 10/1112012 - 101091 . 23EGLER INC 6,106.65 GENERATOR REPAIRS 00005569 298978 SWO50188838 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,106.65 1,156,864.09 Grand Total Payment instrument Totals Check Total 1,156,864.09 Total Payments 1,156,864.09 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 113,156.19 - 02300, POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 287.98 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 1.900.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,525.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 180,740.04 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 110,678.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,710.42 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 4,451.00 ' 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 17,365.48, 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,821.08 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,407.06 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,435.28 05800 LIQUOR FUND 283,236.20 . - 05900 UTILITY FUND 402,481.72 -. 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 17.28 07400. PSTF AGENCY FUND 16,399.79 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 57.05 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,194.52 Report Totals 1,156,864.09 j - CITY OF EDINA 10/912012 7:44:46 Council Check Summary Page - 1 10/11/2012- 10/11/2012 We confirm =to the best of our knowledge and. belief, that these claims comply in all materialrespects with the requiremerits of -the City of Edina purchasing=poli 'es nd procedure ttc �' —fJj_-nWW1 rector C' ager To: Mayor & Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering Date: October 16, 2012 Subject: Aquatic Center Utility Repairs Contract No. PK 12 -5 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: October 9, 2012 Company: 1. Red Pederson Utilities, Inc. 2. Minncomm Utility Construction Company Recommended Quote or Bid: Red Pederson Utilities, Inc. General Information: owe 0 • `��RPat1p`K�O • 1000 Agenda Item #: IV. C. The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: December 9, 2012 Amount of Quote or Bid: I. $24,825.00 2. $33,975.00 $ 24,825.00 The Aquatic Center Utility Repairs Project was initiated due to a broken water service pipe at the Aquatic Center. The water service pipe broke in August near the end of the season. A temporary pipe was used so operations could continue to the end of the season. This project will install a new water service pipe to the Aquatic Center to allow operations to begin in the spring. Staff recommends awarding the bid to Red Pederson Utilities, Inc. If approved by Council, the project must be completed by November 21, 2012. G:IPWICENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTSI2012WC 12 -SPK Aquatic Center Water SerMDMIMMISQItem IV. C. Request for Purchase Aquatic Center Utility Repairs Contract No. PK 12 -5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50-h St - Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council IIIH:I Agenda Item #:IV.D The Recommended Bid is From: Brian Olson, Director of Public Works lijm — ® Within Budget ❑. Not Within Budget Date: 10/02/2012 Subject: Purchase of truck body and plow equipment. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: 7/20/2012 2/28/2013 Company: Towmaster truck equipment. Recommended Quote or Bid: Towmaster truck equipment. State contract # 38250 Amount of Quote or Bid: $ 105,439.67 General Information: This is the equipment that will be installed on the cab and chassis of the truck. This will be an order that will be filled in 2013 and come from the utilities capital equipment replacement budget and payment will not be required until the truck is delivered before the snow season of 2013 -2014. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council From: Brian Olson, Director of Public Works C� Date: 10/02/2012 Subject: Purchase of cab a tandem axle cab and chassis truck. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 7/12/2012 Company: Astelford International Trucks. Recommended Quote or Bid: Astelford International Trucks, state contract # 31563 A, O Le N \ Jaw; Agenda Item #: IV.E ,The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: 10/31/2012 Amount of Quote or Bid: $84,308.83 General Information: This truck will replace a 2000 Sterling tandem axle dump truck with plow equipment. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50d, St • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Susie Miller, Braemar Arena Date: October 10, 2012 Subject: Braemar Arena Three Furnaces and Air Conditioning Units. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: October 3, 2012 Company: I. McQuay, Factory Service 2. Flare Heating and Air Conditioning .w9sN o Ce: t4 v Cn �y • ,�roRPORp`��� • 1849 Agenda Item #: IV.F. The Recommended Bid is Within Budget 0 NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: N/A Amount of Quote or Bid: $35,769.43 $22,390.00 General Information: This is an emergency repair. The 3 furnaces are located in the lower level of the Arena and heat the upper level office, ticket booth, and additional spaces in the lower level. The existing furnaces were installed in 1987 and are residential units that are only 80% efficient. Recently, while network wiring was being completed at the Arena, the venting for the 3 furnaces broke. Terry Klapperick, City of Edina HVAC Specialist, red tagged the furnaces. Due to the age and condition of the equipment, attempts to repair the deficiencies were unsuccessful. The proposed furnaces are 96% efficient. This is an unbudgeted emergency repair, however, the Arena has saved nearly $30,000 in the last 12 months in electricity and gas due to energy efficient changes implemented within the Arena. The air conditioning units are included due to their age and condition and there is a $1500 rebate for completing all projects at once. After rebates, the total price will be $20,040.00. We have attempted to receive additional quotes from three different companies. Flare Heating and Air Conditioning is a company Terry Klapperick has worked with often and he highly recommends. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: October 16, 2012 w O e� Cn Agenda Item #: IV. G. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -143 Authorizing An Application To The Metropolitan Council For A Livable Community Act Tax Base Revitalization Account For The Redevelopment Of The Pentagon Park Property Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution so that the application for grant funding can be submitted in advance of the November Ist deadline. Information / Background: ABOUT TBRA: The Met. Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) is a competitive grant program that funds the investigation and clean -up of polluted areas that have lost commercial /industrial activity. The grants are intended to help make such under - performing sites available for economic re- development that enhances the local and regional tax base while promoting job retention and job growth. Grant funds are awarded twice annually. The source of funds is the Metropolitan Council and the grant requires NO matching City funds. Program rules require that the City of Edina apply for the grant on behalf of the private developer /owner. When grants are awarded, the City will then enter into a sub - recipient agreement with the developer /owner. PREVIOUS GRANT AWARD: In 2008, the City and previous owner were awarded a $317,400 TBRA grant for asbestos abatement in the mid -rise office building at West 77th Street and Highway 100. Due to the failure of that previous redevelopment effort, the grant agreement was never executed and the funds were retained by the Metropolitan Council for other eligible projects in the region. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' Sc • Edina, MN 55424 CURRENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT: Located in Edina's Gateway Redevelopment Area, several parcels in the Pentagon Park office complex have been purchased by Pentagon North, LLC, which is owned by Hillcrest Development, LLLP. The 37 -acre site includes eleven separate buildings constructed in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Despite their outstanding location, the buildings have exceptionally high vacancy rates. The building's age, outdated systems and deferred maintenance hinder the productive re -use of the site. A previous redevelopment effort was unable to secure financing and the site has declined for the last several years. The new owner is prepared for and committed to a long -term redevelopment effort. The first phase of redevelopment focuses on the seven low -rise office buildings located along West 77th Street. Several of these buildings will be gutted, stabilized and remodeled to restore their desirability for occupancy. This work requires the removal of significant amounts of asbestos and lead -based paint. Extensive environmental survey work has been completed by Pentagon North, LLC. These investigations indicate that a substantial amount of asbestos and lead -based paint removal is necessary. These hazardous materials are required to be addressed for these properties to achieve their highest and best uses. Subsequent phases of redevelopment will perform similar work on the remaining buildings on the site. Additional grant applications are anticipated to increase the viability of the future phases of reinvestment. The developer /owner will clarify the extent of the work once the level of grant funding is determined in January 2012. Failure to secure the environmental grant funds will require Pentagon North, LLC to reconsider the redevelopment strategy and likely limit site redevelopment alternatives. Such limitations are likely to result in delayed occupancy and less investment in the City's office/industrial district. Attachment Resolution No. 2012 -143 L111 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -143 AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE COMMUNITY ACT TAX BASE REVITALIZATION ACCOUNT FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PENTAGON PARK PROPERTY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council'of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS.the City of Edina is a participant in the Livable Communities Acts Local Housing Incentives Account Program for 2012 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore . eligible to make application apply for funds under the Tax Base Revitalization Account; and WHEREAS the City has identified a contamination clean -up project within the City that meets' the Tax Base Revitalization Account's purpose /s and criteria; and WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project and grant administration; and WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract grant(agreements; and WHEREAS the City finds that the required contamination cleanup will not occur through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future without Tax Base Revitalization Account grant funding; and WHEREAS the City represents that it has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure funding for the activities for which Livable Communities Act Tax Base Revitalization Account funding is sought but was not able to find or secure from other sources funding that is necessary for cleanup completion and states that this representation is based on the following reasons and supporting facts: Due to existing conditions and lack investment by the previous ownership, the property has limited occupancy; by the end of October 2012 it will be 85% vacant. The property's condition and value.will' continue to decline until it is properly repositioned and stabilized. • Due ;to the extent and location of asbestos containing materials and lead -based paint throughout the ' buildings; redevelopment of the properties for their highest and best use is extremely difficult and not feasible without grant assistance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, if the. City is awarded a Tax Base Revitalization Account grant for this project, the City Council of Edina, Minnesota acknowledges it will be the grantee and agrees to act as legal sponsor administer and be responsible for grant funds expended for the project contained in the Tax Base Revitalization grant application submitted on November 1, 2012. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 16th day of October, 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) n CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October 16, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Marty Scheerer, Edina Fire Chief Date: Oct. 16, 2012 Subject: Fire Department Certificates of Merit o e` g�m: y O Agenda Item#: V. A Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑X Action Requested: Present Centennial Lakes Park Manager Tom Shirley and Park Maintenance Supervisor Doug May with the certificates of merit from the Edina Fire Department for their life saving actions on Oct. 2, 2012. Information / Background: On Tuesday, Oct. 2, a small group was dropped off at the entrance of Centennial Lakes Park for a morning of walking, chatting and fresh air. A 96- year -old man separated from the group with a fishing pole and proceeded toward the lake north just north of Hughes Pavilion. The man stepped down onto the lowest step near the lake and lost his balance. He fell into the water. Panic set in and the man began flailing and sent himself further out into the lake. Park Manager Tom Shirley rushed over to see what the commotion was about as the group gathered around. Attempts to direct the man safely back to the side of the lake or to stand were deemed hopeless, as neither he nor most of the people in his group smoke any English. As the man's head began sinking under the water, Shirley and Park Maintenance Supervisor Doug May both jumped into the lake and quickly brought the man above water and lifted him onto the landing. 9 -1- I was called and the two stayed with the man until medical personnel took over. Thanks to the quick actions of Shirley and May, tragedy was averted. Shirley and May are presented with a Certificate of Merit. As defined by the Edina Fire Department Directive No. 165.00: "Certificate of Merit may be given to department members or other persons for a distinguished administrative project or program that greatly benefits the Edina Fire Department or the City of Edina. This award may also be given to some other person for saving a life or property, attempting to save a life or property and is the highest award given to non -Fire Department members." City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 iv�n� +vii _ LITHO. IN U.S.A. tc P7 7_777 I CATE OF MERIT AM . . . . . . . . . . A'-� This certificate is awarded to ,tom - = q Tom Shirley ti 'MIN. -F 0-" On behalf of the Edina Fire Department, in recognition of heroic life savin s actions on Oct I ')nl') CITYoPEDINA, MINNESOTA tii 1 h v .2 , A—S 1. _))GOM4621. s. 77 W Mar= Schecrcr, Fire Chief Scott Neal, City Manager w" .2- Oct. 16, 2012 21. i9N g"1 Oct 16, 2012 �Wr ZED W"TT r, qw�c-, "7 MAW LITHO, IN U.S A. • j \� Vp • less AGENDA ITEM V. B. Kids Voting No packet data Oral presentation Information coming` e 0 e Cn 1Sao To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action X❑ Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Continued Public Hearing - Special Assessments Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -370 — Resolution No. 2012 -124. Action Requested: ' Approve assessments as proposed for Improvements BA -370. Information / Background: The final assessment hearing was continued due to an error in the final assessment roll. The public hearing was not closed and no public testimony was received prior to continuing the public hearing. The final assessment roll was revised to reflect the correct Residential Equivalent Units (REU). The home at 6101 Idywood Drive is constructed on two lots: 6101 and 6105 Idywood Drive, see attached aerial photo. The preliminary assessment roll included a total of two REU's for these lots. Staff re- evaluated the REU assignment for this property with the Community Development Department. The Community Development Department considers 6105 Idywood Drive a non - conforming R I lot; meaning that the property cannot be sold as a separate lot, therefore the REU's have been revised to I REU for both lots. The $7,743.20 from the previous assessment roll has been transferred to the water fund to maintain the same assessment cost for the remaining properties. Attached you will find a Revised Analysis of Assessment, Revised Final Assessment Roll, and Certificate of Mailing including the Notice of Public Hearing. Also included with this report is a letter of objection from Chris Johnson of 5308 Highwood Drive. Staff has contacted Mr. Johnson to talk about the appeal process. ATTACHMENTS: • Improvements BA -370 Revised Analysis of Assessment, Revised Final Assessment Roll, Certificate o Mailing, Notice of Public Hearing, and Resolution No. 2012 -124. • Objection Letter from 5308 Highwood Drive Dated September 20, 2012. • Aerial photo of 6101 and 6105 Idylwood Drive. &Ipwladminlassessments12012 asessmentslba -370 arsons hillUtem A& continue public hearing - special assessments arson's hill neighborhood reconstruction - imp no. ba -370 - resolution no. 2012- 124.doc City of Edina • 4801 W. 501" St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS. OF ASSESSMENT (REVISED 20121016) FOR: Roadway Improvements: BA -370 LOCATION: Carson's Hill Neighborhood Improvements Proposed Actual (Pending) CONTRACTOR: Midwest Asphalt Corporation $ 1,136;068.17 $ 1,500,000.00 MICS EXPENSES $ 7,243.41 $ 1,143,311.58 PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: $ 500.00 LABOR COST: $ 80,472.79 PROJECT FINANCE COST: $ 22,370.83 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 1,246,655.20 $ 1,500,000.00 ASSESSABLE UNITS: 161.00 $ 7,743.20 $ 9,316.77 TOTAL $ 1,246,655.20 ASSESSABLE COST ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT = $ 9,316.77 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT = $ 7,743.20 TOTAL ASSESSABLE"COST $ 7,7.43.20 LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: 15 YEARS Page 1 of 4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 Revised October 16, 2012 PID # NO STREET OWNER City/State/Zip ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST 2911721330007 5321 Blake Rd Kendal Masica Edina, MN 55436 1/3 $2,581.07 3211721220037 5401 Blake Rd Timothy Carter Edina MN 55436 1/3 $2,581.07 3211721230049 6000 Eden Prairie Rd Michael & In erid Mohn Edina, MN 55436 1/3 $2,681.07 3211721210036 5600 Heather Ln Harvey D Devries Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721240062 5604 Heather Ln David S & Karen J Rulifson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210037 5605 Heather Ln Thomas R Brambilla Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240068 5607 Heather Ln Gary C Johnson & Lance H Olson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240063 5608 Heather Ln Yi Liu Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240059 5609 Heather Ln Roberta Cole Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240064 5612 Heather Ln Erica J Klausen Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240060 5613 Heather Ln Steven G McCormick Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240065 5616 Heather Ln Brenda L Ram Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240061 5617 Heather Ln Ben & Janet Presley Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210008 5500 Highwood Dr Martin Barke Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210009 5504 Highwood Dr Jung Lee Kim Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210002 5505 Highwood Dr Robert D Whyte & Julie A Grey Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210010 5508 Highwood Dr Gregory E Nevins Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721210003 5509 Highwood Dr Shelley N C Holl Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240050 5512 Highwood Dr Lauren M & Paul A Stewart Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210004 5513 Highwood Dr Christopher R & Katherine Johnson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210005 5517 Highwood Dr David A Ostlund & Megan Yuen Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210006 5521 Highwood Dr Jeffrey & Margie L Goodnuff Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210007 5525 Highwood Dr Marjorie J Fiedler Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230069 5600 Highwood Dr Bruce W Coles & Lucy C Peterson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240051 5601 Highwood Dr William Collins & Dana Ann Lajoie Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7.743.20 3211721230068 5604 Highwood Dr Kelly Mccoy Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240052 5605 Highwood Dr Stacy J Geiss Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230067 5608 Highwood Dr Daniel & Lee A Azar Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721240053 5609 Highwood Dr Michael R & Pamela J Levoir Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230066 5612 Highwood Dr Rodric J & Phyllis C Pelo Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721240054 5613 Highwood Dr Paul Thomas Beutell Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 32117212300iF 5616 Highwood Dr Nathan P & Amanda J Kremer Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330043 5228 Highwood Dr W Carol L Doughman Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330049 5229 Highwood Dr W Gene N Haugland Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330044 5232 Highwood Dr W Roger Scharton Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330048 5229 Highwood Dr W Gene Haugland Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 2911721330045 5236 Highwood Dr W Cynthia Mcgarvey Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 2911721330047 5239 Highwood Dr W James H & Kathleen R Zavoral Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330046 5240 Highwood Dr W Barbara L Schulz Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330009 5300 Highwood Dr W Charles E White Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 29117213300111 5301 Highwood Dr W Penny Newkirk Winslow Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 29117213300171 5304 Highwood Dr W Ross A & Laura L Haymaker Edina, MN 55436 1 1.00 $7,743.20 29117213300121 1 ILarkin Plaza lJohn C Larkin Wells, MI 49894 1 1.00 $7,743.20 Page 2 of 4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 Revised October 16, 2012 PID # NO STREET OWNER City /StatelZip ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST 2911721330018 5308 Highwood Dr W Christopher D Johnson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330013 5309 Highwood Dr W Timothy J & Lori A Dolan Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330019 5312 Highwood Dr W Patricia M Christopulos Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330015 5313 Highwood Dr W John S Mcdonald Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330010 5316 Highwood Dr W Susan Jo Lee Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220028 5400 Highwood Dr W Lang W & Mary A Johnson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220029 5404 Highwood Dr W Thomas H & Patricia L Igel Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220027 5405 Highwood Dr W John P & Sharon R Engelbert Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220030 5408 Highwood Dr W Sunny Sik Kim Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220026 5409 Highwood Dr W Vera G Green Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220031 5412 Highwood Dr W Robert W Bakke Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220025 5415 Highwood Dr W Jerald J & Stella M Rezac Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220032 5416 Highwood Dr W Charles Moberg Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220024 6709 Highwood Dr W Barbara P Morley /E Wenkus Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220033 5420 Highwood Dr W Erle C & Helen J Reiter Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220023 5421 Highwood Dr W Thomas Cheme & Lee Robison Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220021 5423 Highwood Dr W Phillip & Susan C Little Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220034 5424 Highwood Dr W Reed S Gilbert Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220016 5425 Highwood Dr W Karin Lynn Van Dyke Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721220035 5428 Highwood Dr W Amit Dhingra Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220017 5429 Highwood Dr W James R Gray Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220036 1155 Cedar View Dr Harold Lazaretti 2007 Gift Trust Minneapolis, MN 55405 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220004 5501 Highwood Dr W Peter Jr & Deborah P Mahon Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220003 5507 Highwood Dr W William C Hollway Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220052 5510 Highwood Dr W Lon Oberpriller Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220002 5511 Highwood Dr W Todd C & Susan M Young Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220057 5514 Highwood Dr W Mark L & Lota Lou E Werth Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230004 5515 Highwood Dr W Dustin & Jennifer Ordorff Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220056 100 Wilderness Way #349 Frank W Bonvino Naples, FL 34105 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230017 60 Seagate Dr #803 Paul T Faust Naples, FL 34103 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220018 6000 Idylwood Dr Robert M Paule Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220076 6001 Idylwood Dr Jeffrey A Wessels Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220077 6005 Idylwood Dr Jonathan K Newburg Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220078 6009 Idylwood Dr Craig C & Ann P Lagorio Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220019 6012 Idylwood Dr Brian T Ostenso Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220079 6015 Id (wood Dr Jamie A Garza Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220020 6016 Idylwood Dr Corilus K & Rebecca A Weber Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220010 6020 Id (wood Dr Eric T & Carla C Dahl Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220015 6021 Idylwood Dr Scott A Harness & Eileen Mccarthy- Hamess Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220009 6100 Id lwood Dr Sue H Santrach Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220013 6101 Ildy1wood Dr James K O'Neill Edina, MN 55436 0.00 $0.00 3211721220008 6104 1 Idylwood Dr Richard J Anderson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220014 6101 1 Idylwood Dr James K O'Neill Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 Page 3 of 4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 Revised October 16, 2012 PID # STREET OWNER ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT NO City /StatelZip REU COST 3211721220007 6108 Idylwood Dr John & Sharon Howell Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220012 6109 Idylwood Dr Mark J & Lori J Lamere Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220006 6112 Ildy1wood Dr Jill Jelenko Angen Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220011 6113 1 Idylwood Dr Robert & Kristine Dickey Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721230056 6100 jJeffrey Ln Randy M & Kristi L Olinger Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230038 6101 Jeffrey Ln John H Horns Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230037 6103 jJeffrey Ln Richard N & Laura -B Kuyath Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230055 6104 1 Jeffrey Ln Nickie J Haddad Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230036 6105 jJeffrey Ln James V Davis Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7.743.20 3211721230035 6109 jJeffrey Ln B & L Monahan Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230018 6112 jJeffrey Ln Mary Kaye Covey Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230034 6113 jJeffrey Ln Julia N Goetsch Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230064 6000 Kaymar Dr Gregory B Kalogerson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230063 6004 Kaymar Dr T S Kohlbry Jr & G Kohlbry Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230062 6008 Kaymar Dr Richard D & Megan K Stone Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230061 6012 Kaymar Dr Christopher S & Margaret Davis Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230060 6016 JlKaymar Dr JMS Custom Homes LLC Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230048 6017 1 Kaymar Dr Jeanette L Swofford Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230059 6020 1 Kaymar Dr Rick C Bredice & Mary A Kenealy - Bredice Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7.743.20 3211721230058 6024 1 Kaymar Dr Jay D & Ilene S Goldberg Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230047 6025 lKaymar Dr Sarah L Chamberlain Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230057 6028 lKaymar Dr Steven A Woit Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230046 6029 Kaymar Dr Chad & Laura Vandertop Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230045 6033 Kaymar Dr Thomas G Nevers Edina, MN 55436 .1.00 $7.743.20 3211721230044 6037 Kaymar Dr Linda L White Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230043 6101 lKaymar Dr Richard Grussendorf Jr Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230039 6104 Kaymar Dr Alan P & Joan C Mercure Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230042 6105 Kaymar Dr Gary A Gabrielson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230040 6108 Kaymar Dr Elizabeth Patten Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230007 6109 Kaymar Dr Glenn & Anne Pierskalla Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230041 6112 Kaymar Dr Max A Boller Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230006 6113 Kaymar Dr John A West Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230005 6117 1 Kaymar Dr A T Hanson III Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721220058 6000 Leslee Ln Denis J Rooney Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7.743.20 3211721230016 6001 1 Leslee Ln Geoffrey M & Kathleen J Allen Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220059 6004 1 Leslee Ln Michael & Jennifer Mclenighan Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230015 6005 1 Leslee Ln Thomas J & Laura C Koch Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220060 6008 1 Leslee Ln Yanda Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230014 6009 1 Leslee Ln James Bloedel Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7.743.20 3211721220061 6012 Leslee Ln Jeffrey R & Cynthia S Engelking Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230013 6013 iFoxtail Leslee Ln David L & Lynn A Cookson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220062 6016 Leslee Ln Andrew S & Luann M Wyatt Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230012 447 Dr Leonard L & Barbara M Stoltz Longs, SC 29568 1.00 $7,743.20 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-370 Revised October 16, 2012 PID # NO STREET OWNER Ctty /StatefZip ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST 3211721220063 6020. Leslee Ln Kyle V & Kelly Quinn Kirsch Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220064 6024 Leslee Ln Mr & Mrs John C Skinner Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721230019 6028 Leslee Ln Jeffrey Jarvey Edina, MN 55436. 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721340048 ,5980: Pine Grove Rd : Neal & Susan Erickson Edina, MN 55436, 1.00" $7743.20 2911721330035 6000 Pine Grove Rd John C & Margaret H Miller Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721210071. ; 6001 - Pine Grove Rd Jon & Kathryn Perlinger Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220081 6005 Pine Grove Rd Peter M & Kathi J Wright Edina, MN 55436 1.00 ' $7,743.20 2911721330036 6008 , Pine Grove Rd Richard & Anne Nygaard Edina, MN 55436 1.00' $7,743.20 3211721220042 6009 -- Pine-Grove Rd. Richard H & Julie K Romens Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7`743.20 2911721330037 6012 Pine Grove Rd Matthew C Peterson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220043 6013 Pine Grove Rd Michael R Doyle Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 2911721330038 6016 Pine Grove Rd Daniel W &.Donna F Melville Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220044 6017 Pine Grove Rd . Rolf J & Jennifer B Pederson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 - $7 743.20 2911721330039 6020 Pine Grove Rd Joseph E & Mary Ann Clinton Edina, MN 55436 1.00 • . $7,743.20 3211721220045 241 Parkins' St Unit F303 Navalpakkam & Shanthi Ramakaishnan Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 1.00 $7 743.20 2911721330014 6024 Pine Grove Rd J Timothy & Colette Diegel Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220046 6025 Pine Grove Rd Jay H & Marie Kathryn M Krachmer Edina, MN 55436 - 1100- $7,743.20 3211721220047 6029. Pine Grove Rd Larry & Jeanne Wood Edina, MN 55436 1:00 $7,743.20 3211721220048 6000 Saxony;,Rd Winston & Norma Sletterdahl Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220049 6004 Saxony; Rd Melanie H Hylok Edina, MN 55436 .1.00 $7743.20 3211721220053 6005. Saxony; Rd Stephen D & Judith M Carle Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220050 6008- . Saxony; Rd Timothy D Kehr Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220054 6009 Saxony, Rd Gregory A & Stefanie A Trebil Edina, MN 55436 - 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220051 6012 ,. Saxony. Rd Brian & Krista Doyle Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,7.43.20- 3211721220055 6015 Saxony; Rd Barry J Bremer & Beth Turco_ . Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743. 0 3211721220066 6020 Saxony; Rd Vance R & Victoria Philips Edina, MN 55436 1.00. $7,743.20 3211721220071 6021 Saxony; Rd Mark J & Sherrie J Hornung Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220067 6100 Saxony; Rd Chris & Mary Kalogerson Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220072 6101 Saxony, Rd R Scott & Victoria L Forbes Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220068 6104 Saxony! Rd Holden J Hsiao Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7,743.20 3211721220073 6105 Saxonj Rd Robert I & Nancy J Goeme Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721220069 6108 Saxony; Rd Richard H & Mary L Hendrickson, Edina, MN 55436 1.00 $7 743.20 3211721220074 6109 . Saxony! Rd John A & Phyllis A Tornquist Edina, MN 55436 1.00. $7,743.20 3211721220070 3211721220075 6112 6113 Saxonyl Rd Saxonyl Rd Matthew D Frauenshuh Vel & Ambereen Angamuthu Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 1.00 " 1.00 $7,743.20 $7,743.20 rotal Page 4 of 4 $1,246,655.21 PRELIMINARY TOTAL ROADWAY COSTI $ 1,246,655.20 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REU 161.00 AVERAGE COST PER REU $ 7,743.20 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 14, 2012, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Carson's Hill Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA -370 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 17 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. . ' NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand_ and the seal of said City this 14th day of September, 2012. R1 Edina Cit,, �j NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 The Edina City Council, will meet at 7 p.m. Oct. 2, 2012, at City Hall, 4801 W. 50t' St., Edina, MN, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the Carson's Hill Neighborhood: Property Identification No. 321 1721220047 The special assessment to this property for roadway reconstruction is: $7,743.20. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $1,254,398.85. The proposed assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. Payment Options The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years at the rate of 3.1 percent. Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the Oct. 2 meeting, you may pay the assessment in one of these ways: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest.to the City on or before Nov. 30, 2012. 2. Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment by Nov. 30, 2012. The remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be' payable with your real estate taxes. in 2013, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 3.1 percent per annum from Oct. 2, 2012 to Dec. 31, 2013. 3. Pay the as with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid by Nov. 30, 2012, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real _ _estate.taxes_in20.13, with. interest_o'n_ the_entire'assessment at -the _rate_of 3.1_ percent..per_annum_from.. Oct..2, 2012 to Dec. 3 1,1013. Deferment The City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for a homestead property owned by a person age 65 or older for whom it would be a hardship, to make payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. at Edina City Hall. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by Nova 9, 2012: 'Cut the bottom section and mail in with your payment if paying on or before November 30, 2012: PAYMENT PROCEDURE • If paying on or. before Nov. 30, 2012, please cut and return this stub with your payment. • Make check payable to the City of Edina • Mail payment or,pay in person: Edina City Hall, Assessing Division, 4801 W. 50`h Street, Edina, MN 55424 Pay this amount by If not paid on or before. Nov. 30, 2012, PID Impr. No. November 30, 2012, to the assessment will be placed on your avoid interest charges. property taxes at 3.1 % annual interest rate, spread out over 15 years. 3211721220047 BA -370 $7,743.20 3211721230049 Michael & Inge6d Mohn 6000 Ec166.Prairie Rd Edina, MN 55436 321172121,0037 Thomas,R .Brambilla 5605 Heather, Ln Edina; MN 55436 3211721240059 Roberta Cole 5609 Heather Ln Edina, 'MN 55436 3211721240065 Brenda L Ram 5616 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721210009 Jung Lee Kim 5504 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210003 Shelley N C ,Roll 5509 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210005 David A Ostlund & Megan Yuen 5517 Highwood D'r Edina, MN 55436 3211721230069 Bruce W Coles & Lucy C Peterson 5600 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 11721240052 oracy J Geiss 5605 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 2911721330007 Kendal Masica 5321 Blake Rd Edina, MN 55436 321.1721210036 Harvey D Devries 5600 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721240068 Gary C Johnson & Lance H Olson 5607 Heather L.n Edina, MN 55436 3211721240064 Erica J Klausen 5612 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721240061 Ben & Janet Presley 5617 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721210002 Robert D Whyte & Julie A Grey 5505 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220037 Timothy Carter 5401 Blake Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721240062 David S & Karen J Rulifson 5604 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721240063 Yi Liu 5608 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436, 3211721240060 Steven G McCormick 5613 Heather Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721210008 Martin Barke 5500 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210010 Gregory E Nevins 5508 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721240050 3211721210004 Lauren M & Paul A Stewart Christopher R & Katherine 5512 Highwood Dr Johnson Edina, MN 55436 5513: Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210006 -- - 321'1721210007 Jeffrey & Margie L Goodnuff Marjorie J: Fiedler 5521 Highwood Dr 5525 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721240051 William Collins & Dana Ann Lajoie 5601 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230067 Daniel & Lee A Azar 5608 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230068 Kelly Mccoy 5604 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721240053 Michael R & Pamela J Levoir 5609 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 5543.6 3211721230066 3211721240054 3211721230065 Rodric J & Phyllis C Pelo Paul Thomas Beutell Nathan P & Amanda J Kremer 5612 Highwood Dr 5613 Highwood Dr 5616 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330043 2911721330049 2911721330044 Carol L Doughman Gene N Haugland Roger Scharton 5228 Highwood Dr W 5229 Highwood Dr W 5232 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330048 2911721330045 2911721330047 Gene Haugland Cynthia Mcgarvey James W& Kathleen R Zavoral 5229 Highwood Dr W 5236 Highwood Dr W '5239 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55.436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330046 2911721330009 2911721330011 Barbara L Schulz Charles E White Penny Newkirk Winslow 5240 Highwood Dr W 5300 Highwood Dr W 5301 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436. Edina, MN 55436 2911721330017 2911721330012 2911721330018 Ross A & Laura L Haymaker John C Larkin Christopher D Johnson 5304 Highwood Dr W 0 Larkin Plaza 5308 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Wells, MI 49894 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330013 2911721330019 2911721330015 Timothy J & Lori A Dolan Patricia M Christopul6s John S Mcdonald 5309 Highwood Dr W 5312 Highwood Dr W 5313 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330010 3211721220028 3211721220029 Susan Jo Lee Larry W & Mary A Johnson Thomas H & Patricia L Igel 5316 Highwood Dr W 5400 Highwood Dr W 5404 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220027 3211721220030 3211721220026 John P & Sharon R Engelbert Sunny Sik Kim Vera G Green 5405 Highwood Dr W 5408 Highwood Dr W 5409 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220031 3211721220025 3211721220032 Robert W Bakke Jerald J & Stella M Rezac Charles Moberg 5412 Highwood Dr W 5415 Highwood Dr W 5416 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220024 3211721220033 3211721220023 Barbara P Morley /E Wenkus Erie C & Helen J Reiter Thomas Cherne & Lee Robison 6709 Highwood Dr W 5420 Highwood Dr W 5421 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436, Edina, MN 55436 3211721220021 3211721220034 3211721220016 Phillip & Susan C Little Reed S Gilbert Karin Lynn Van Dyke .54.23 Highwood Dr W 5424 Highwood Dr W 5425 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220035 3211721220017 3211721220036 Amit Dhingra James R Gray. Harold Lazaretti 2007 Gift Trust 5428 Highwood Dr W 5429 Highwood Dr W 1155 Cedar View Dr Edina, 'MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Minneapolis, MN 55405 3211721220004 3211721220003 3211721.220052 Peter & Deborah P Mahon William C Hollway L`on Oberpriller 5501 Highwood Dr W 5507 Highwood Dr W 5510, Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436' Edina,, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220002 3211721220057 3211721230004 Todd C.& Susan M Young Mark L & Lota Lou E Werth Dustin & Jennifer Ordorff 55.11 Highwood Dr W 5514 Highwood Dr W 5515 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 321.1721220056 3211721230017 3211721220018 Frank W Bonvino Paul T Faust Robert M Paule 100 Wilderness Way #349 60 Seagate Dr #803 6000 Idylwood Dr Naples, FL 34105 Naples, FL 34103 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220076 3211721220077 3211721220078 Jeffrey A Wessels Jonathan K Newburg Craig C & Ann P Lagorio 6001 Idylwood,Dr 6005 Idylwood Dr 6009 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN .55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220019 3211721220079 3211721220020 Brian T Ostenso . Jamie A Garza Codus K & Rebecca A Weber 6012 Idylwood Dr 6015 Idylwood Dr 6016 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 321172122001 -0 - 3211721220015 T — - 3211721220009 Eric T & Carla C Dahl Scott. A Harness & Eileen Sue H Santrach 6020.Idylwood Dr Mccarthy- Harness 6100 Idylwood Dr Edina, M,N 55436 6021:ldylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina,, MN :55436 3211721220013 3211721220008 321`1721220013 James K O'Neill Richard J Anderson James K O'Neill 6101 Idylwood Dr 6104 ldylwood Dr 6101 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 ?11721220007 3211721220012 3211721220006 john & Sharon Howell Mark J & Lori J Lamere Jill Jelenko Angen 6108 Idylwood Dr 6109 Idylwood Dr 6112 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220011. 3211721230056 3211721230038 Robert & Kristine Dickey Randy M & Kristi L Olinger John H Horns 6113 Idylwood Dr 6100 Jeffrey Ln 6101 Jeffrey Ln Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230037 3211721230055 3211721230036 Richard N & Laura B Kuyath Nickie J Haddad James V Davis 6103 Jeffrey Ln 6104 Jeffrey Ln 6105 Jeffrey Ln Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721.230035 3211721230018 3211721230034 B & L Monahan Mary Kaye Covey Julia N Goetsch 6109 Jeffrey Ln 6112 Jeffrey Ln 6113 Jeffrey Ln Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230064 3211721230063 3211721230062 Gregory B Kalogerson T S Kohlbry Jr & G Kohlbry Richard D & Megan K Stone 6000 Kaymar Dr 6004 Kaymar Dr 6008 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230061 3211721230060 3211721230048 Christopher S & Margaret Davis JMS Custom Homes LLC Jeanette L Swofford 6012 Kaymar Dr 6016 Kaymar Dr 6017 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230059 3211721230058 3211721230047 Rick C Bredice & Mary A Jay D & Ilene S Goldberg Sarah L Chamberlain Kenealy- Bredice 6024 Kaymar Dr 6025 Kaymar Dr 6020 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230057 3211721230046 3211721230045 Steven A Woit Chad & Laura Vandertop Thomas G Nevers 6028 Kaymar Dr 6029 Kaymar Dr 6033 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230044 3211721230043 3211721230039 Linda L White Richard Grussendorf Jr Alan P & Joan C Mercure 6037 Kaymar Dr 6101 Kaymar Dr 6104 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230042 3211721230040 '3211721230007 Gary A Gabrielson Elizabeth Patten Glenn & Anne Pierskalla 6105 Kaymar Dr 6108 Kaymar Dr 6109 Kaymar Dr - Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230041 3211721230006 3211721230005 Max A Boller John A West A T Hanson III 6112 Kaymar Dr 6113 Kaymar Dr 6117 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220058 3211721230016 3211721220059 Denis J Rooney Geoffrey M & Kathleen J Allen Michael & Jennifer Mclenighan 6000 Leslee Ln 6001 Leslee Ln .. 6004 Leslee Ln Edina,`MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721230015 Thomas J & Laura C Koch 6005 Leslee Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721220061 Jeffrey R & Cynthia S Engelking 6012 Leslee Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721230012 Leonard L & Barbara M Stoltz 447 Foxtail Dr Longs, SC 29568- 321.1721230019 Jeffrey Jarvey 6028 Leslee Ln Edina, MN 55436 :3211721210071 Jon & Kathryn Perlinger 6001 Pine.Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220042 Richard H & Julie K Romens 6009 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220060 Yanda Living .Trust, Stephen R & Debra J Yanda 6008 Leslee Ln Edina; MN 55436 3211721230013 David L &.Lynn A- Cookson 6013 Leslee Ln Edina, MN;55436 3211721220063 Kyle V & Kelly Quinn Kirsch 6020 Leslee Ln Edina, MN 55436 2911721340048 Neal & Susan Erickson 5980 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220081 Peter M & Kathi J Wright 6005 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 2911721330037 Matthew C Peterson 6012 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721230014 James Bloedel 6009 Leslee Ln Edina, MN 55436 3211721220062 Andrew'S & Luann M Wyatt 6016 Leslee to Edina, MN 55436 3211721220064 Mr & Mrs John C Skinner 6024 Leslee Ln Edina, MN 55436 2911721330035 John C & Margaret H Miller 6000 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 2911721330036 Richard & Anne Nygaard 6008 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220043 Michael R Doyle 6013 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 2911721330038- - - -_ _- 3211721220044 - = 291 - 1721330039 -- — Daniel W & Donna F Melville., Rolf J & Jennifer B Pederson Joseph E &.Mary Ann Clinton 6016 Pine Grove Rd 6017 Pine Grove Rd 6020 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220045 N avalpakkam & Shanthi Ramakaishnan 241 Parkins St Unit F303 Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 - x.11721220047 rry & Jeanne Wood 6029 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 2911721330014 J Timothy & Colette.Diegel 6024 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220048 Winston & Norma Sletterdahl 6000 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220046 Jay H & Marie Kathryn M Krachmer 6025 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220049 Melanie H Hylok 6004 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220053 3211721220050 3211721220054 Stephen D & Judith M Carle Timothy D Kehr Gregory A & Stefanie A Trebil 6005 Saxony Rd 6008 Saxony Rd 6009 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220051 3211721220055 3211721220066 Brian & Krista Doyle Barry J Bremer & Beth Turco Vance R & Victoria Philips 6012 Saxony'Rd 6015 Saxony Rd 6020 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220071 3211721220067 3211721220072 Mark J & Sherrie J Hornung Chris & Mary Kalogerson R Scott & Victoria L Forbes 6021 Saxony Rd 6100 Saxony Rd 6101 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220068 3211721220073 3211721220069 Holden J Hsiao Robert I & Nancy J Goerne Richard H & Mary L Hendrickson 6104 Saxony Rd 6105 Saxony Rd 6108 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN.55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721220074 3211721220070 3211721220075 John A & Phyllis A Tornquist Matthew D Frauenshuh Vel & Ambereen Angamuthu 6109 Saxony Rd 6112 Saxony Rd 6113 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-124 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -370 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 3.1 % per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2013. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year. on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Carson's Hill Neighborhood Levy No. 18282 15 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special. assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 16th day of October, 2012 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro $oulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.99v • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Resolution No. 2012 -124 Page Two . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk i SEP Z0� Lkv) (P.. ON 1` 1 f_�... Win- 579kjC� W_ _d r7 k_ (>�N III O1l 1N 1�}E N(-,V was NCT N P6cr MY A�6 M6 _ T-,O I Nro � U (vy �SL1��� ��►? .������(,� � � ) _ __ _ l NFL N �c1.G� ���' ��,� -owl �� � /��,►`� � � ��nl�W r N� <ja ri Pqj\)Y ao my S t �J N�� c Sri M Ndy - Pal +ter �rJN��SSi� n � OC`TT(�;/z rl Nr A tV ru 12% v r- �i j ih LVOT-�, To /-3-ee-6MPL)SH I-iUS-r ) T i -ro 20 <U O L NTf7 0j-,j) tJ 5 6J I °PeiC;r YnA Cg- 5309 •� +mot - I:�'� �_._�� `. • � � 't14,��" '�'' �� '� ' I �` � � . , , � fir• �fa aw �i --^ ei _ �.ar -�_. a►19E#� ara�r�w�•�• a �.Qe.•�_r 1. r • .�Fo�1.i rtl li F U o Le �,, • J�roRPOiiA�F'� • X888 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.B From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012. Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Site Plan Review, Bruce Carlson, 7501 France Avenue, Resolution No. 2012 -143 Action Requested: Cancel the Public Hearing. Information / Background: The applicant has revised the site plan; therefore, it will go back to the Planning Commission for consideration. The City Council would likely see this proposal in December. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St • Edina, MN 55424 o e ,f • ,�CORPOBl, • less To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Southdale Apartments — Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, Front Yard Setback Variance, Parking Stall Variance and Subdivision at 10 Southdale Center for Stuart Development Company, Resolution Nos. 2012 -141 and 2012 -142 Action Requested:. Continue the Public Hearing to November 5, 2012. Information / Background: The applicant has requested that consideration of this proposal be continued to November 5th, so they can provide additional information regarding how the proposed development would impact residents of the Westin located to the South. The applicant is creating renderings of what the new buildings would look like from the Westin property. Residents of the Westin are concerned about views of downtown Minneapolis being blocked by the new 10 -story building. The applicant will be meeting with residents of the Westin to present and discuss this new information prior to consideration by the City Council on November 5th. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 St. • Edina, MN 55424 PROJECT SUMMARY FLOOR TOTAL LL -1 PKG LL -2 PKG 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOOR 5TH FLOOR 6TH FLOOR 7TH FLOOR 8TH FLOOR 9TH FLOOR 10TH FLOOR BUILDING FOOTPRINT 58,495 DATE oe -17 -I2 DRAWN BY 1® OIECKED BY [M1M COMMESION NO. 1834.01 58,495 SF FLOOR AREA 49,711 48,512 44,342 45,564 45,564 37,029 27,297 26,357 12,701 12,701 11,887 11,621 360,166 SF DWELLING UNITS 232 UNITS PARKING —SITE PARKING — TOWNHOME 134 142 51 (surface) 367 STALLS 20 driveway) 20 arage) PERVIOUS 93,370 SF 42% PERVIOUS LOT SIZE 221,718 SF 221,718 sf (5.1 acres) UNIT DENSITY 232 units / 5.1 acres 45 units per acre FLOOR AREA RATIO 257,140 sf / 223,838 sf 1.56 (1.14 w/a parking) KEY NOTES OIPNDSWE BERMINC; (SEE CML) O2 CORTEN STEEL RETAINING WA15 OINTEGRATED SEATING STRUCTURE O8' CONCRETE WA AT OS 5' CONCRETE WANWAY OBIKE RACKS OCORTEN STEEL SCREEN WALL FEATURE OB PERVIOUS PAVERS O9 PEWOUS ASPHALT D BOLLARDS OENTRY SITE FEATURE 12 RAN CARDEN OPEDESTRIAN BOARDWALK- BRIDGE ' l LIMESTONE WALL 15 RASED CORTEN STEEL ENTRY PIANMR 18 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO SOUTHOALE AND GVlERIA LEGEND GREEN ROOF RANDAFEEN PAVER(A) PAVER (d) I \ I I \ I 1 I \ I I 1 E II I \I 1 I I � I 1 1 I ® I I I 1 \ 11 1 � 1 \ / •r Beau I 1 1 I I / g / I / 1 I I I \ I 1 1 11 BKV G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kr'oos Vogel Group Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Facsimile: 612- 339 -6212 www.bkvgroup.com STUARTCO oue KOMS OMF ro—R. U r Southdale Housing CERTIFICATION Ihh�Y � * Dm 3ua ph, q' c. a- KePOrt— p,q-.d M me Kr -1elmy dr - .p niion ad tlet l em a duly License Number REVISIONS No. DATE DATE oe -17 -I2 DRAWN BY 1® OIECKED BY [M1M COMMESION NO. 1834.01 SITE PLAN L100 0 2011 BKV Group, Inc EOE I ICI oilil ul Ili�ill I I��a d oir I . „I FM I�It I " Ic � � • �Ij I,E� � � 1,, I' fA ! 1 RA fin lost I b�- FA Ila OF 1 0C - �I v r i i d � Z.� .... . -�.�� ��� nit �. a.. •_ - -� ■ ■ -•- r � � I 1 i� -'- its: r■ ,*" spa /�i� � i,. 1� i ll 1 - � `' II �I ��' � � '��,� � � V r�. a '� !�I 1• i-'r' rl .I�I I• � ~I ( r r� • �~` s-t.� jr y.. � -..-- i Y ��i' � l 1 1 ■■ II r4 or r� �� � {��{ � � a! itr I�■ � , � !- I I ' � I � �U� � ��I` '�'1��'N � �.�I,rl� � ♦,r . � h�G �l ,! Dal "i r � -�' ���' r ' 1 � ���.� I � �rl 1 I I, .�tl'��. G:I �a.i- � •I!1 � i' ����IM ��� ,i ,-�,� 1 1�1_�1`•�1 rl �► �r.� . �rr�!I. , I..••. A�`� ,,f �' �LI�►111,� �� .:� ��� ..111 c•�ti IN-Do � % �II��� 11, u1:;�/,,,� ;� �,�� I�� , = 1,!!�tpy ■tr�il �IIrJ�� '•�.'r) trill �• � �.e, i i11,�1i • �f PI Land � , a ��° � ti.? i, to G i d � Z.� .... . -�.�� ��� nit �. a.. •_ - -� ■ ■ -•- r � � I 1 i� -'- its: r■ ,*" spa /�i� � i,. 1� i ll 1 - � `' II �I ��' � � '��,� � � V r�. a '� !�I 1• i-'r' rl .I�I I• � ~I ( r r� • �~` s-t.� jr y.. � -..-- i Y ��i' � l 1 1 ■■ II r4 or r� �� � {��{ � � a! itr I�■ � , � !- I I ' � I � �U� � ��I` '�'1��'N � �.�I,rl� � ♦,r . � h�G �l ,! Dal "i r � -�' ���' r ' 1 � ���.� I � �rl 1 I I, .�tl'��. G:I �a.i- � •I!1 � i' ����IM ��� ,i ,-�,� 1 1�1_�1`•�1 rl �► �r.� . �rr�!I. , I..••. A�`� ,,f �' �LI�►111,� �� .:� ��� ..111 c•�ti IN-Do � % �II��� 11, u1:;�/,,,� ;� �,�� I�� , = 1,!!�tpy ■tr�il �IIrJ�� '•�.'r) trill �• � �.e, i i11,�1i • �f PI Land � , a ��° � ti.? i, =,I-- I\ velopment o um -esic entia' Do Prefinished Metal Panel/ Painted Fiber Cement Black Champagne Silver Composite Wood Panel Color - I Cast Stone Color -2 Fiber Cement Siding Color -3 Le ���� roRess Toc MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance No. 2012 -18 Amending Section 850 — Produce Stand in the RMD, Regional Medical District Action Requested: Waive second reading and approve the proposed Ordinance Amendment. Information / Background: Robb Gruman on behalf of Fairview Southdale Hospital is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would allow produce stands in the Regional Medical District, similar to those allowed in the PCD, Planned Commercial District. As a part of the Do Town initiative, Fairview Hospital would like to have a very small scale farmers' market at the northeast corner of 65th and Drew. The market would consist of no more than five vendors, selling, fruit, vegetables, herbs and fresh cut flowers. The market would only be open one day per week, on Tuesdays from 2:00 — 5:00 pm from June through October. Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 27, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Ordinance Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance 2012 -18 •. Minutes from the September 27, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, September 27, 2012 City of Edina • 4801 W. 5011 St. • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -18 J AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING PRODUCE STANDS IN THE RMD— REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850'.03. Subd. 3. Definitions is hereby amended to add the following definition: Produce Stand. A temporary seasonal structure or area, at which products such as vegetables, fruit, herbs, cut flowers and plants are sold. Section 2. Subsection 850.18. Subd. 2. is hereby amended as follows: 850.18 Regional Medical District (RMD) Subd. 1 Principal Uses. A. Hospitals. B. Medical and dental offices and clinics. C. Laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services, including, but not limited to, medical research, radiology, hematology, serology, immunology, allergy, biochemistry, basal metabolism, microbiology, parasitology, pathology, histology, cytology, toxicology and pharmacology. Laboratories engaged in the production or manufacture of goods or products for commercial sale or distribution shall not be considered laboratories within the meaning and intent of this paragraph. Subd. 2 Accessory Uses. A. Living quarters and recreational and educational facilities for nurses, interns, staff members, hospital employees and volunteers, if the uses are located within or are contiguous to the principal building. B. Off - street parking facilities for ambulances, service trucks and automobiles owned by tenants, employees, patients and visitors. C. Within principal buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX feet or more, ten percent of the floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 and PCD -2 subdistricts, if the primary function of the uses is to serve the needs of occupants of, and visitors to, the principal use. D. Helistops for use by helicopters involved in emergency rescue operations. E. Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the City Manager. The produce stand(s) may only occur one day per week, and only operate during the months of June through October. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX City Clerk 2012. 2 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 7:00 P.M. / I. Chair Grabic\called the meeting to order at 7: II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll ca were Comm' sinners Scherer, Forrest, Kilberg, Platteter, Cherkassky, Carpenr, tau te nto ischer Grabiel. Absent from the roll: Schro er and Potts III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was fi)6d as submitted. \ IV. Commissi Ffier Fischer moved approval of th September 12, 2012, meeting minutes. Commis oner Platteter seconded the motion. ll voted aye; motion carried. V. C MU l N ne VI. REPORTS Ordinance Amendment to Allow Produce Stands in RMD Zoning District Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission that Robb Gruman on behalf of Fairview Southdale Hospital is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would allow produce stands in the Regional Medical District, similar to those allowed in the PCD, Planned Commercial District. As a part of the Do Town initiative, Fairview Hospital would like to have a very small scale farmers' market at the northeast corner of 65th and Drew. The market would consist of no more than five vendors, selling, fruit, vegetables, herbs and fresh cut Page 1 of 3 flowers. The market would only be open one day per week, on Tuesdays from 2:00 — 5:00 pm from June through October. This type of use is currently allowed as a permitted accessory use in the PCD -1, PCD -2 and PCD -3 zoning districts. It is listed in the Ordinance as: "Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the City Manager." In practice, the City of Edina has had very few requests for this type of use. Occationally, there has been a produce stand at Southdale. The Ordinance before the Planning Commission uses this same concept, but has placed additional restrictions to limit the use. The goal of the ordinance is to allow this type of use on a very limited bases so as to protect existing businesses in Edina that sell this same type of product within an existing retail building. Produce stands are not currently defined in the Zoning Ordinance, therefore, a definition is also recommended, and been added to the proposed Ordinance Amendment. Aaker concluded that staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Ordinance, subject to any revisions that you would deem necessary. Appearing for the Applicant Robb Gruman, Fairview Southdale Hospital Discussion Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Aaker if there is a permitting process in place for "Produce Stands ". Aaker responded in the affirmative. Continuing, Aaker explained that "Produce Stands" are also a permitted use in the Planned Commercial District (PCD) and are subject to specific conditions and pursuant to a permit issued by the City Manager. Commissioner Fischer commented that he was curious why this issue even needs to be addressed. He pointed out that currently the hospital is permitted accessory uses (gift store, pharmacy, and cafeteria), adding this is accessory too. Planner Aaker agreed, however, Code is firm on controlling the type of merchandise sold and the location of outdoor sales. Aaker explained the City doesn't want to see anyone selling shrimp out of a truck and similar items throughout the City. Commissioner Carpenter questioned if the produce stands are required to operate during specific hours. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative adding the hospital would establish these hours. She reported hours of operation are required to be listed on the application. Applicant Presentation Robb Gruman, Fairview Southdale Hospital informed the Commission hospital staff was approached through the Do Town initiative and believe that allowing produce stands on Page 2 of 3 the hospital campus is a good thing. Gruman explained that at this time the Fairview system currently allows produce stands on three of its campuses. Gruman said they found produce stands benefit everyone from hospital residents and their visitors to hospital employees and venders. Continuing, Gruman said the hospital would limit the hours of operation to four (4), and one day of operation per week. Hours could be from 1 -4 PM or 2 -6 PM, adding he's not certain of the final times or day of week. Concluding Gruman pointed out there would be no on or off - loading of fresh vegetables, fruits and flowers on the street noting the campus has a staging area to accommodate drop offs and pickups. Gruman reiterated he believes this is a great opportunity and a good thing. Chair Grabiel asked Mr. Gruman if he believes there could be an issue with people parking their car to gain access to the stand. Gruman responded there is that possibility; however, security is placed at that end of the hospital and the security guards would move traffic along. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved to forward this amendment request to the City Council for their action. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS None. IX. STAFF COMMENTS No Comments X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Scherer moved adjournment at 7:35 PM. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. l70te, 110044x& e Respectfully submitted Page 3 of 3 .J � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # VILA Cary Teague September 27, 2012 Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Robb Gruman on behalf of Fairview Southdale Hospital is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would allow produce stands in the Regional Medical District, similar to those allowed in the PCD, Planned Commercial District. (See location and applican'ts narritive on pages A3 —A8.) As a part of the Do Town initiative, Fairview Hospital would like to have a very small scale farmers' market at the northeast corner of 65th and- Drew. (See location on pages A5, A6 and A8.) The market would consist of no more than five vendors, selling, fruit, vegetables, herbs and fresh cut flowers. The market would only be open one day per week, on Tuesdays from 2:00 — 5:00 pm from June through October. This type of use is currently allowed as a permitted accessory use in the PCD -1, PCD -2 and PCD -3 zoning districts. (See existing Ordinance on page A9.) It is listed in the Ordinance as: "Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the City Manager." In practice, the City of Edina has had very few requests for this type of use. Occationally, there has been a produce stand at Southdale. The Ordinance before the Planning Commission uses this same concept, but has placed additional restrictions to limit the use. The goal of the ordinance is to allow this type of use on a very limited bases so as to protect existing businesses in Edina that sell this same type of product within an existing retail building. Produce stands are not currently defined in the Zoning Ordinance, therefore, a definition is also recommended, and been added to the proposed Ordinance Amendment. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Ordinance, subject to any revisions that you would deem necessary. Draft 9 -14 -2012 ORDINANCE NO. 2012- AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING PRODUCE STANDS IN THE RMD— REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.03. Subd. 3. Definitions is hereby amended to add the following definition: Produce Stand. A temporary seasonal structure or area, at which products such as vegetables, fruit, herbs, cut flowers and plants are sold. Section 2: Subsection 850.18. Subd. 2. is hereby amended as follows: 850.18 Regional Medical District (RMD) Subd. 1 Principal Uses. A. Hospitals. B. Medical and dental offices and clinics. C. Laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services, including, but not limited to, medical research, radiology, hematology, serology, immunology, allergy, biochemistry, basal metabolism, microbiology, parasitology, pathology, histology, cytology, toxicology and pharmacology. Laboratories engaged in the production or manufacture of goods or products for commercial sale or distribution shall not be considered laboratories within the meaning and intent of this paragraph. Subd. 2 Accessory Uses. A. Living quarters and recreational and educational facilities for nurses, interns, staff members, hospital employees and volunteers, if the uses are located within or are contiguous to the principal building. B. Off - street parking facilities for ambulances, service trucks and automobiles owned by tenants, employees, patients and visitors. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX I Added text — XXXX N C. Within principal buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 and PCD -2 subdistricts, if the primary function of the uses is to serve the needs of occupants of, and visitors to, the principal use. D. Helistops for use by helicopters involved in emergency rescue operations. rroduce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the City Manager iThe produce stand(s) may only occur one day per week, and only operate during the months of June through Octobers - Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX 4 a 2 A) City of Edina ■ : iiiii -_ _:.u.uulu.un {ItYi.u.l _ __ __ _ __ == _ __ == �� _ �. 11 - . - ME ME zz Legend Lakas El Park* -IIIr111- .. .= IIIII 1111 - 11111 1lllt :- as al 922 . ii ii ... =� _ = wa via �II� �. -r -. Ill a- �■ ` - -'.. _. ■..Cp - -■___ 111111111 !.�� "- ��-�= �iPo.0 _ 1 ■■ f■ Irr11� �� -'�►. 1111 � ■11, �� = = =.. . ■■ ■■ �Igjr: �jlll Illljj� �� - :: a - . ■■ ��.�I. �I 9 I ,nom �C : �i:: ■ ■ ■� �_� t r ■- ::a �■ '�i iii w � �r..111111. -• �.,. - f1�� #fir'■ ■ � r����l{{�i :� � /Ili :� �� :�� +'♦ ♦ +� ♦,���w j���ff::�a �w If• i wmom ii i� j Q ♦1 �� � 111 11111.1 �11�� ��ii Mom on f.1111t{ ■tl 1/.e ■ �� ii +�.. 1112, ,111 i� �� •• I.UI �a �� . C i1t1111r 1\ �: ►*11 A 1 r �..... .� C� ♦♦� �� .. ��r�1a1 #I i ::i: as: �� A4 A)- M City of Edina t 6705 d7J1 1' _ 6]01 1700 _ ^, 610 6.700 670} I/ ` !' �1- TA DR _ • M1 "- 6.10.i Legend Surrounding House Number Labels LICd 6J 0 ) 1� ,6705 p01 670! Tqs � r •� 6 a Glfl, 4 dJ i 6 +u0 p0! 7 670! ^ � 67ei i r I(- i 3 e � n ' �� _ � � House Number Labels Street Name Label. ! ,�. G]il 767 11' 6717 6,7 }I 67}7 7 IE+ I � t .; lr - I&L V City Limits I ` Creeks ( ;16719 L �. 9 ,. g Lake Names Lakes dJ1x 11 + Parks 6337 1 _ VV Parcels 2009 Aerial ,�.,..�'. I Plioto 676 3 . . __, � 4.. Rd7T[. \• "a -{�t2 c- 7- _ , �. '6700 l � s,. r+ . .,r. 1 OrP' IJ--1;Q. 6400 ke r 1 K ' 0 ..: `t 4 1' S �•. � 7? ��11 4005, 6313 �^ fi 15' - - R a E500 6316 ' LOC� K. fi v1.41 r4 a 24 s 1 ,6525 1 - . 1'yi �� -: •r�4 -�,.. �.i it / 1 - _- 1 S:iiiiii• N - 6577 1 J {•� �.: 1 e.t♦ jai X� p. 11 Y 4w !5'.`f�ap - 3501 C 1 e, PID:2902824230169 ©k Qti,,� r, 6401 France Ave S N 12 Q ' tie Edina, MN 55410 dl • r��Y64� ir,�r~ . 7!77717 A)- M i 1 City of Edina rM iqi IM M ! T M fl^ 'yTl r 1 N9 { . ..y AL Legend Surrounding Hwse Number Labels House Number Labels Street Narm Labels .! City Umits /, %/ Creek■ Lake Names ❑ Lakes EJ Parks Parcels 2009 Aerial Photo slit Loce,4- rrs - rr'G7 � � A pr ma ®Tram . T' e'e`l r ...x.�us�cmw+�u:x cwxn r��aA na-rr Rte as. w •�� r • ya 4 F� City of Edina rM iqi IM M ! T M fl^ 'yTl r 1 N9 { . ..y AL Legend Surrounding Hwse Number Labels House Number Labels Street Narm Labels .! City Umits /, %/ Creek■ Lake Names ❑ Lakes EJ Parks Parcels 2009 Aerial Photo slit Loce,4- 130 FAIRVIEW Bradley Beard Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue South Edina, MN, 55435 To whom it may concern: Fairview Southdale Hospital wishes to implement at Farm to Fairview at Southdale Market. It is our understanding that in order to implement this market, an amendment is needed in the city's zoning ordinances. Fairview is participating in do. Town as a member of both the Edina worksite coalition and the Health Care Leadership Council. We feel this project would add value to our wellness program, enhance patient and visitor experience at the hospital, as well as provide a community benefit to the neighborhood adjacent to the hospital. It also brings the City of Edina one step closer to becoming a do. Town. Fairview has offered several other farmers' markets, located at our University and Riverside Hospitals and at our Stinson office location. They are a great employee morale booster, offer . convenience and affordable produce at the worksite, and help strengthen our community partnerships. The Farm to Fairview at Southdale Market will be a small -scale farmers' market on the property of Fairview Southdale Hospital off of 651h and Drew Avenue (see enclosed photograph). The market will consist of no more than 5 vendors, selling locally grown fruits, vegetables, herbs and flowers. We anticipate having the market open on Tuesdays from 2:00 pm -5:00 p.m . While we realize it is late in the season, we'd like to open the market for a few weeks through mid -late October. We would anticipate a June - October season starting in 2013. Additionally, since the market will be held on Tuesdays, it will not directly compete with the existing Thursday evening market at Centennial Lakes. Vendors will have 10X10 space available and will provide their own tents and equipment. Hand washing and restroom facilities will be available at the hospital through the Emergency Room entrance. The market is not in a parking lot; therefore parking spaces are not affected. Parking will be available for vendors in the adjacent power plant parking lot. We do not anticipate this being a destination market; therefore nearby customer, patient, or employee parking will not be affected. As a proud supporter of do. Town, we feel that having a farmers market at our hospital will have a positive impact on our community, our employees, and those who visit or seek services from Fairview Southdale Hospital. Everyone can benefit from having fresh, local produce in a convenient location, encouraging healthy living and fostering a community of shoppers who buy local. We thank you for considering our request. Sincerely, ,d. - Bradley Beard, Fairview Southdale Hospital President A-7 Proposed location for Farm to Fairview, Southdale Farmers' Market 1- �. N Y A Noma _- a i*i..- { JI • � I I � .1 I i �' l j� i Map r Traffi c .. M �j r• uImagey 0201 2 Googla, Alec aata '-ogle • Edit ire Google Map Maker Report a probl ern We propose to have the vendors set up on the lawn outside our power plant building. Parking for vendors will be available in the power plant parking lot. All vendors will be required to follow health codes and keep food off the ground. City of Edina Sexually oriented businesses. Subd 5.Principal Uses in PCD -4. Automobile service centers. Car washes. Gas stations. Subd. 6. Conditional Uses. Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.16 A. PCDA and PCD -2. Multi - residential uses. B. PCD -3. Automobile agencies selling new, unused vehicles. Boat or marine stores or agencies selling or displaying new, unused boats. Multi- residential uses. Offices except offices allowed as a permitted accessory use. All non - residential uses that increase the FAR to more than 0.5. Subd. 7. Accessory Uses in PCD -1. Off - street parking facilities. Buildings for the storage of merchandise to be retailed by the related principal use. Not more than two amusement devices. Drive through facilities, except those accessory to financial institutions. A restaurant may have a drive - through facility subject to the requirements in Section 850.07, Subd. 14.F. Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the Manager Subd. 8. Accessory Uses in PCD -2. All accessory uses allowed in PCD -1. Drive - through facilities. Amusement devices. Subd. 9. Accessory Uses in PCD -3. All accessory uses permitted in PCD -1 and PCD -2. Automobile or boat and marine stores or agencies selling used automobiles or boats, if (i) such a use is accessory to and on the same lot as a related principal use selling new automobiles or boats, and (ii) the total floor area and lot area devoted to the accessory use does not exceed that of the principal use. 850-84 Supplement 2012 -01 Section 2. Subsection 850.16, Subd. 6 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the Manager" Permits would be subject to the following conditions: 1. Consent of property owner 2. Adequate parking to support stand and principal use 3. Location of stand will not cause traffic problems on -site or on public right of way 4. Stands shall not be larger than 180 square feet 5. All signage must be affixed to the stand 6. Permits valid from June 1, to October 1, on a given year 7. Permits will be issued only for properties located in the PCD -1,2 or 3 districts Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. First Reading: February 18, 2003 Second Reading: CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50'" STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 Application For Temporary Retail Sales from Produce Stands FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Approved Planning Dept Date Approved City Clerk Date • Complete this application in ink or use a typewriter. Please refer to City Code 850.16 Subd. 7. Owner of Property City Name of non - profit Organization (if applicable Describe Products Offered For Sale Phone State Zip Dates of Temporary Sale Hours of Operation Size of Signage (Attach Detailed Drawing) Contact Person Phone No. and Fax No. This Contact person will receive all legal notices.. Your entity is responsible to keep this information current. Minnesota Tax ID Number Federal Tax ID Number If a Minnesota Tax ID is not required please explain N THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number or Social Security Number. This information may be used to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your license if you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties, or interest. The. Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, the State of Minnesota Driver License Section, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, and Ramsey County Warrant Office. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. Your residence address and telephone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and telephone number. Please Sign below to indicate that you have read this notice: Signature I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Number I hereby certify all the information given is complete and accurate. X X Applicant's Signature Date FOR CITY USE ONLY: Forms required with this application: Workers' Compensation Insurance Proof Form Other ow e Cn • ,�roRPpIiP��� • 1888 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: Vlll. A. " From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Consider Special Asse$sment Roll — Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -334 — Resolution No. 2012 -121. Action Requested: Approve assessments as proposed for Improvements BA -334. Approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements. Information / Background: At its October 2 City Council meeting, the City Council closed the public hearing on the final assessment for the Minnehaha Woods Roadway Reconstruction project. The City Council voted to delay the vote on the issue until the October 16 City Council meeting so that staff could re- evaluate the Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements, further explain the difference between the estimate and final costs of sanitary sewer service upgrades, and comment on the engineering fees. Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement (Agreements The Agreement allows residents to add the cost of upgrading their sanitary sewer service and the water service to the special assessments for this project. Staff processed a total of 95 Agreements; I I of these Agreements were approved at the June 21, 2011 City Council meeting, I I Agreements have not been signed by the owners and are not included in the final assessment roll. Staff re -sent the I I agreements on October 5 and had not received any back at the time of this writing. Staff'will now invoice these property owners for the work that was completed by their plumber. Due to the Agreement waiving all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments a property owner could still have his or her sanitary sewer service added to the special assessment if the Agreement is processed at a November City Council meeting. All of the Agreements including the unsigned Agreements are included with this report. Staff is not requesting that the City Council approve the non - signed Agreements until after the property owner signs them. Sanitary Sewer Service Upgrades: Sanitary sewers are designed to drain by gravity. Most neighborhoods have sanitary sewer services at normal depth at the beginning of the sanitary sewer mainline and deeper sanitary sewer services at the outlet of the neighborhood. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`" St. • Edina, MN 55424 W ^*9 Item VIII. A. Special Assessments Page 2 of 3 The cost estimate for the feasibility study was based on a total of 191 services. It was assumed that 189 services were of normal depth and 2 services were at a deeper depth. The normal depth services were assumed to be replaced using an open -cut method whereby where you dig down to the service and replace it. The deeper services were anticipated to be replaced not by digging up the service, but by using a cured - in- place -pipe (CIPP) method. These service replacements that we are referring to were from the sanitary sewer mainline to the right -of -way line. The overall cost of the sanitary sewer service replacements were then divided by the total number of services. It was anticipated that each property owner would pay the same regardless of what type of service was used. The table below indicated the cost estimate for the feasibility study: Type of Service Repair Quantity Cost per Service Total Cost Normal Depth — Open Cut 189 $ 4,436 $ 838,404 Deeper Depth — CIPP 2 $ 11,298 $ 22,596 Total Cost 191 $861,000 Average Cost per Service $ 4,500 During the December 9, 2010 and February 10, 2011 informational meetings, staff and consultant encouraged the property owners to have the entire sanitary sewer service, from the mainline to their home, upgraded by private plumbers. Based on data from the previous project in the Country Club District, staff believed that a homeowner could potentially save some money by having their entire service replaced. During the preparation of the bid documents the method of service replacement was refined to three different types of service replacements. The bid documents included 73 normal depth services using open cut method, 26 normal depth services using CIPP method, and 23 deeper depth service using CIPP method for a total of 122 sanitary sewer services bid with the project. The remaining 69 services were anticipated to be completed by the property owners or were services that were upgraded within the last 15- years. The bid prices for these service replacements are: Type of Service Repair Quantity Cost per Service Total Cost Normal Depth — Type 1 73 $ 1,472.00 $ 107,456.00 Normal Depth —Type I CIPP 26 $ 4,000.00 $ 104,000.00 Deeper Depth — Type 11 CIPP 23 $4,100.00 $ 94.300.00 Average Cost per Service $ 2,506.26 Cost per Service if you include engineering and cost of borrowing. $ 3,463.13 The estimated cost per service after the bids were approved was not communicated to the residents, since the final cost per service is dependent on the final ratio of the three types of replacement methods. The final quantities resulted in much lower than anticipated participation rate along with a much lower ratio of Normal Depth — Type I CIPP and Deeper Depth — Type 11 CIPP to the Normal Depth — Type I replacements. The final quantities resulted in a much lower cost per service: Item VIII. A. Special Assessments Page 3 of 3 Type of Service Repair Quantity Cost per Service Total Cost Normal Depth — Type I 11 $ 1,472.00 $ 16,192.00 Normal Depth —Type I CIPP 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 Deeper Depth — -Type II CIPP 0 $4,100.00 $ 0.00 Total Cost 12 $ 20,192 00 Average Cost per Service $ 1,682.67 A hypothetical final quantities show that the final ratio of the three types of replacement methods does indeed affect the final cost: Type of Service Repair Quantity Cost per Service Total Cost Normal Depth — Type 1 5 $ 1,472.00 $ 7,360.00 Normal Depth —Type I CIPP 23 $ 4,000.00 $ 92,000.00 Deeper Depth — -Type II CIPP 21 $4,100.00 $ 86,100.00 Total Cost 49 $ 125,460.0-0- Average Cost per Service $ 3,784.90 Cost per Service if you include engineering and cost of borrowing. $ 5,230.07 The discussion above affected 53 of the 191 services; 41 services were replaced by private plumbers and 12 services were replaced by the City's contractor. The remaining 72% of the services were either previously upgraded or were replaced from the sanitary sewer mainline to the home by private plumbers. Staff believes that the cost difference should be evaluated using the bid cost analysis of $3,463.13 compared to the final cost of $1,682.67. Staff agrees that this process does not provide a clear cost early enough for a resident to make an informed decision. Therefore, on projects constructed in 2013 and beyond, staff will recommend a refined process that does not depend on a final quantity of the different types of replacement methods. Engineering Fees: The engineering fee for the Minnehaha Woods project is very similar to'other complex construction projects such as the Country Club Project and the recent Ridge Road project. These are the types of projects that the City's Engineering Department recommends to contract out due to the additional expertise and the lack of additional capacity of the Engineering Department. The comparison of overall fees is: Project Overall Cost Engineering Cost Percent of Cost Minnehaha Woods $ 4,581,773 $ 929,707 20% . Country Club $ 12,951,576 $ 2,320,170 18% Ridge Road $ 713,633 $ 252,076 35% ATTACHMENTS: Improvements BA -334 Final Project Costs Analysis, Final Assessment Roll, Certificate Mailing, Notice of Public Hearing, and Resolution No. 2012 -121. Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements. glpwladminlassessments12012 assessments%ba -334 minnehaha woodslitem viil.a. consider special assessment roll - minnehaha woods neighborhood reconstruction - imp ba334 resolution no. 2012- 121.doc CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: J lS Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements Proposed CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: Roadway Improvements: BA -334 LOCATION: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements Proposed Actual Pendin CONTRACTOR: Palda and Sons, Inc. $ 1,550,781.54 $ 2,260,000.00 MICS EXPENSES $ 375,013.54 ,$'1,925,79&08 . PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: $ 500.00 LABOR COST: $ 27,994.97 PROJECT FINANCE COST: $ 35,485.46 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 1,989,775.51 ASSESSABLE UNITS: 192.00 $ 10,363:41 $ 11,800.00 TOTAL $ 1,989,775.51 ASSESSABLE COST ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT = $ 11,800.00 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT = $ 10,363.41 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST $ 10,363.41 LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: 15 YEARS PLEASE�NOTE THAT FORTHS ASSESSMENT $401,000 WAS PROPOSED, FOR SEWER PIPE REPLACEMENT IN THE ROW, TO .',BE ASSESSED TO RESIDENTS. THIS AMOUNT IS'NOT INCLUDED HERE BECAUSE IT VARIES BASED ON EXACT WORK THAT EACH RESIDENT DID AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY CHOOSE TO ADD THE COST TO,THEIR ASSESSMENT. REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-334 PID TAXPAYER NAME ADDRESS CITY /STATE/ZIP Street Uality pgra es (Sewer and/or Water ) Total Assessment Rate REU Agreement No. pprove by City Council 1902824120016 STEVEN W RIDER & MARY V RIDER 5400 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1,682.67 $12,046.08 1 WA 1902824120017 DAVID G STOLPESTAD & CHRISTINA L STOLPESTAD 5404 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,845.00 $14,208.41 1 65 1902824120018 SUSAN E GERLICHER - OLSON & RICHARD J OLSON 5408 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 6,675.00 $17,038.41 1 5 6/21/2011 1902824120019 TAMARA L RICHARDSON & JONAS A RUNQUIST 5412 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120020 CONRAD LEIFUR 5416 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 3.196.00 $13 559.41 1 91 1902824120015 ROSEMARY SIEVE & LORAS SIEVE 5417 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 5,250.00 $15,613.41 1 86 1902824120021 FREDERICK W NIEBUHR PO BOX 390108 EDINA MN 55439 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120014 MARK A TYSON 5421 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120022 JODY L S ROSS & DALE R ROSS 5424 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.4l.. 1 N/A 1902824120013 ELDON NERHEIM 5425 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1,682.67 $12,046.08 1 WA 1902824120023 CONNIE L GRADY 5428 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,100.00 $13,463.41 1 90 1902824120012 BRIAN PANKRATZ 5429 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120024 JOHN F BLOODSWORTH & DIANE G HEACOX 5432 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,996.00 $14,359.41 1 81 1902824120011 PETER & STACY ENXING SENG 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 7,465.00 $17,828.41 1 1 84 1902824120025 ADAM J & MARGARET E GILDNER 5436 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1,682.67 $12,046.08 1 N/A 1902824120010 MICHAEL & STACY SULLIVAN 4536 DUPONT AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 $10,363.41 $ 5,250.00 $15,613.41 1 88 1902824120115 BRUCE A MACHMEIER 5500 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120157 ADAM C JOHNSON & DEANNA E HARTER 5501 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1 682.67 $12,046.08 1 N/A 1902824120116 TRACY K LANGEVIN & TODD R LANGEVIN 5504 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 5,829.00 $16,192.41 1 73 1902824120156 ISTEVEN D BRYAN & NATALIE S SYNHAIVSKY 5505. BROOKVIEW AVE IEDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 1,682.67 $12,046.08 1 N/A 1902824120117 ISHERYL BARE & ROBERT KIRK 5508 BROOKVIEW AV I EDINA MN 55424 $1036341 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120 L 09 DI 5424 10 363. 65 .00 5 018.41 1 55 1902824120118 CASSIDY R STEINER & ANDREW G STEINER 5512 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 5,600.00 $15,963.41 1 53 1902824120154 ELIZABETH M JOHNSON- MCGARRY 5513 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,625.00 $14,988.41 1 85 1902824120119 WILLIAM M MEYER & TOBIE J MEYER 5516 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120153 THOMAS A GARTON 5517 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4.760.00 $15,123.41 1 66 1902824120120 JOANNE M NOVAK 5520 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120152 THOMAS E FISCHER & BARBARA J FISCHER 5521 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120121 ROBERT A PECK & LISA E PECK 5524 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 5,600.00 $15,963.41 1 92 1902824120151 TRICIA T CLARKE & DONALD E CLARKE 5525 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 1 N/A 1902824120122 JAMES W STANGL & BRIDGET A STANGL 5528 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,295.00 $13,658.41 1 34 1902824120150 SHADOW PROPERTIES LLC 18312 MINNETONKA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 $10,363.41 $ 3,450.00 $13,813.41 1 78 1902824120123 JOHN C STEPHENSON 5532 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $10,363.41 1 16 See Note 1 1902824120149 MICHAEL S TRESSLER 5533 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824110090 1 MARCY G SWENSON 5501 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 7 300.00 $17,663.41 1 69 1902824110081 ISARAHMSPENCE 5504 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41. 1 WA 1902824110088 IWILFRIDO R CASTANEDA & SARAH R CASTANEDA 5505 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $10 363.41 1 94 See Note 1 1902824110082 HAROLD D COVLIN 5508 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,700.00 $14,063.41 1 4 6/21/2011 1902824110088 MICHAEL J CALVO & AMY R SCOTT 5509 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 2,400.00 $12,763.41 1 1 6/21/2011 1902824110087 JUSTIN A WAHLS & ANNA L WAHLS 5513 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110106 SCOTT A CARD & JULIE W CARD 5517 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 P0,363.41 $10,363.41 1 20 See Note 1 1902824110103 NANCY J CAVEN 5521 DEVER DR IEDINA MN 55424 10.363.411 $ $10,363.41 1 WA . 1902824120055 GREG J HERNANDEZ & ANNA L HERNANDEZ 5400 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.411$ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120054 KATHRYN C KOESSEL 5401 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 8,550.00 $18,913.41 1 1 41 1902824120056 COLIN S & MINNA K BROOKS 5404 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 1 WA 1902824120053 SANDRA E ROSS 5405 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1 682.67 $12,046.08 1 1 WA 1902824120057 WILLIAM E MCDONALD & MARYAN M MCDONALD 5408 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 8,600.00 $18,963.41 1 1 40 1902824120052 1902824120058 1902824120051 1902824120059 1902824120050 1902824120060 PATRICK E FLANAGAN REBECCA MCCAUGHEY & MARK MCCAUGHEY RICHARD J SHEEHAN & ELIZABETH A SHEEHAN TRACY L HOLTAN SUZY S KRONFELD BAUM & DAVID R BAUM DAVID G PARRY 5409 KELLOGG AVE 5412 KELLOGG AVE 5413 KELLOGG AVE 5416 KELLOGG AVE 5417 KELLOGG AVE 5420 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $10 363.41 $10,363.41 1 10 363.41 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 $ $ $ 5,600.00 $ 5,000.00 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 $ 15,963.41 $15 363.41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 1 WA N/A 22 43 75 See Note 1 See Note 1 1902824120049 1902824120061 1902824120048 1902824120062 1902824120063 1902824120047 19028" "A 1902E 6 BARRY STREIT & KELLY STREIT DORIS ANDERSON PATRICK T LEE THOMAS C BERINGER WILLIAM R LONGER 8 LAURA A LONGER FERDINANDA L OTNESS 5421 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 5424 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 5425 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 5428 KELLOGG AVE igg INA MN 55424 5432 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 5433 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 5436 KELLOGG AVE MN 55424 5437 KELLOGG AVE NN 55424 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 $10 363.41 $10 363.41 $10,363.411 $ $ 5,600.00 $ - $ 5,690.00 $ $ $10,363.41 $15,963.41 $10,363.41 $16 053.41 $10,363.41 $10,353.41 1 1 1 1 1 1 N/A 42 NIA 46 1 WA N/A KAREN R TAYLOR $10,363.411$ 5,750.00 $16 113.41 1 57 MARK T SULLIVAN & JULIE G SULLIVAN R10.363.411$ 5.790. $16:1 53.41 1 60 REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-334 PID TAXPAYER NAME ADDRESS CITYISTATEOP Street uturry upgrades (Sewef andlor Water) Total Assessment Rate REU Agreement No. APPrOVe by City Council 1902824120075 PAUL J DONNAY THREE LLC 4655 63RD AVE N " " MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 $10,363:41 . $- 5.740:00- $16,103.41 1 61-- 1902824120114 JAMES C & KELLY`AJACKSON 5501 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424- —$10.363.41 $ : $10 363.41 1 WA 1902824120076 NANCY K CARLILE &CHRISTOPHER S.CARL'IL'E -: 5504 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 1 181 See Note 1 1902824120113 BHARAT CHARAN .' 5505 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120077 MARY E KOTTKE 901 MARQUETTE AVE #2700 - MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 $10,363.41 $ - 7,050.00 $17,413.'41 - 1 54 1902824120112 GAIL M COLLINS _ 5509 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ % . 9,100.00 $19,463.41 1 71 1902824120078 BRUCE C RUSSELL = 5512 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10363.41 $ $10,363:41 ' 1 N/A 1902824120111- KATHRYN AMERTZ & DONALD'K MERTZ `" - 5513-KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,36141 '$�- 3; 660:00 '- $14,043.41 1 5&, 1902824120079 GORDON E & KATHY L-OTTERLEI 4207 52ND ST W EDINA MN 55439 $10363.41 $ 1 682.67 $12,046.08 1). N /A_ . 1902824120110 = DANIEL J GIONET & ANDREA S GIONET 5517 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363Al $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120080 CAROLYN R COCHRANE & ANDREWS COCHRANE 5520 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,695.00 $14 "058.41. 1 74 1902824120109 • NICHOLAS'J SOLINGER &-LISA 'L,SOLINGER ": 5521 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,750.00, .•:$15 113.41 _ 1 33 1902824120081 SARAH J GRIFFIN & GREGORY J PFLASTER 5524 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 10.363.411 $ 1,995.00E $12358.41 -1 39 1902824120108 JOHN PLOTNICKY 5525 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120082 MICHAEL M & AMY K STAGGS 5528 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120107 MARGARET A REYNOLDS 5529 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 - 1 N/A 1902824120083 MARY ELLEN BRATTLAND 5532 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120106 MARGARET P GALBRAITH 5313 320TH ST CUSHING MN 56443 $10,363.41 $ 3,695.00- $14,058.41 1 44 1902824120084_ JOANNE MCRAE 5536 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120105 DIANE N SPANGLER &"DAVID RSPANGLER 5537 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,450;00 $14 813A1 1 45 1902824130070 PAMELA E SCHWIER & JAMES G SCHWIER 5600 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.41 $- $10 363.41 1 WA - 1902824130062 IDONA M DARKENWALD & CLEMENT B DARKENWALD 5601 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $.. �6 800.00 $17 163.41 1 12' ' 1902824130069 JACKIE K DUMMER & DALE,M DUMMER 5604 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 6,500:00 -$16;863.41' 1 32 1902824130063- ROBERT J:DALY & KAREN E DALY- .: 5605 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $. 4,500:00 _ $14;863:41 1 3- 6/21/2011 1902824130068' ANDREW C TEITSCHEID & AMY J TEITSCHEID 5608 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ -$10 363A1 - 1 N/A 1902824130067 DONALD 'E LAREAU 5612 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10363.41 $ $10 363.41 _. 1 N/A 1902824130066 BRYAN T & ARON M BARNETT 5616 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 '$— 1,682.67 $12,046.08 1 N/A 1902824130065 CHRISTINE A VANDONGEN 5620 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424_ $10,363.41 $. $10,36141 1 N/A 1902824130061 SCOTT D ASPENSON & AMANDA K ASPENSON 5625 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,361 1 $ $10,363.41 . 1 N/A 1902824130064 TODD S EMERSON & AUDRA'M O.EMERSON' . 5628 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120036 THOMAS K BROWER & PETRA S BROWER 5400 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3'995.00 .$14,358:41 1 37 1902824120035 BRYAN D COLWELL 5401 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1. - N/A 1902824120037. RONALD L KALIEBE &'CAROL B FLINT - KALIEBE 5404 OAKLAWN AVE, EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $- $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120034 MARY L DYKSTRA & DENNIS D DYKSTRA" 5405 OAKLAWN AVE IEDINA MN:55424 $10,363.41 $ 5,125.W $15'488:41 1 36 1902824120038. JOHN R CRABTREE 5408 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 1 15 See Note 1 1902824120033 ROCKY, B OSBORN &JENNIFER A OSBORN 5409 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,350.00 $14,213.41 1 48 1902824120039 GLORIA L SULLIVAN 5412 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 2,800.00 $13,163.41 1 51 1902824120032 KATHRYN A BENNETT & EDWARD -L BENNETT ' 5413 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363:41 1 N/A 1902824120040 LOU A GILBERT _ 5416 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 1 77 See Note 1 1902824120031 KRISTEN D SUTLEY & DANIEL E LEPTUCK - 5417 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120041 RODNEY G THOLE & ;CAROL J HOLE; TRSTES OF THOLE FMLY REV TRS 220 COLLIER BLVD S #501 MARCO-ISLAND FL 34145 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120030 SAMUEL PACE 5421 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 §1120,363.41 363.41 $ 2,975.00 $13,338.41 1 93 1902824120042. MARJORIE A ADLER 5424 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $. 4,650.00' - $15,013.41 1 13 1902824120029 KENT P FREDRICKSON 35 OXFORD AVE LAREND N HILLS I 60514 ' $10,363.41 $ 4,550.00 $14,913.41 1 52 1902824120043 STEVEN L SEVERSON & SARA E'SEVERSON 5428 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 1 N/A 1902824120028 MARIA K EGGEMEYER 5429 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,36141 $' 6,775.00 _ $17,138.41 1 1 59- 1902824120044 JOHN FALLDIN 5432 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10;363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120027 MAUREEN 0 ENGER 5433 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 2,950.00 $13,313.41 1 89 1902824120045 REFINED LLC 5905 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 10,363.411 $ 1,682.67, $12046.08 1 N/A 1902824120026 NANCY H KING & DOUGLAS E KING 5437 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,890.00 $15,253.41 1 47 1902824120095 GORDON R HILLEQUE & EMILY ERUSHA HILLEQUE 5500 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3'675.00 $14,038.41 1 68 1902824120134 RICHARD W WEIGE 5501 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,600.00 $14,963.41 1 14 1902824120096 SHAWN K OLSEN & DANA R OLSEN 5504 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,076.00 _ $14,439.41 1 62 1902824120133 KELLY INGVALDSON & ERIC INGVALDSON . 5505 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 4,650.00 $15,013.41 1 -38 1902824120097 CAROLINE E OSTROM & JOHN E KARTHAUS 5508 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120132 SUSAN L MORK 5509 OAKLAWN AVE 15512 EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120098 WILLIAM H KELLY & CARYN E KELLY OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 4.5 $15,303.41 1 29 1902824120131 CELESTE A GERVAIS 5513 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1 $10 363.41 1 N/A 1902824120099 1 CAROLYN DONNELLY 5516 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1 $10.363.411$ 1 $10 363.41 1 N/A REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-334 utility upgrades ApprOV0 (Sewer and/or Total Assessment Agreement by City PID TAXPAYER NAME ADDRESS CITY /STATE2IP Street Water ) Rate REU No. Council 1902824120130 LISA L CARVER & JONATHAN A CARVER 5517 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363 1 N/A 1902824120100 JOSEPHINE BAUER 5520 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA-MN-55424 $10,363.41 $ $10363'41 1 N/A 1902824120129 KARI FINBERG- SCHOOLER 5521 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ - $10"36341 1 N/A 1902824120101 THOMAS P DAVIS & BRIDGET W DAVIS 5524 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $ 3.100.00 $13,463.41 1 31 1902824120128 HEIDI V WENNEN & DARREN J WENNEN 5525 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 _$10,363.41 $10.363.41 $ 2,950.00 $13,313.41 1 1 26 18312 MINNETONKA 1902824120102 SHADOW PROPERTIES LLC BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 $10,363.41 $10,363.41 1 95 See Note 1 1902824120127 CHRISTOPER C LONG 5529 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120103 HARRIET E BUSDICKER 5532 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 31950.00 $14,313.41 1 56 1902824120126 BRIAN A BELANGER 5533 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902824120104 CATHY L REED 5536 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 4,250.00 $14,613.41 1 50 1902824120125 ROBERT H DALY & LAURA Z DALY 5537 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10 363.41 1 N/A 1902824130060 RAYMOND J BOOK & JULIE A PARKE 5600 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 10.363.411 $ 4,650.00 $15.013.41 1 64 1902824130001 PATRICIA M VAYDA & DOUGLAS W VAYDA 5601 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 -$10,363.41 1 17 See Note 1 1902824130002 ROBERT DOUG GREEN & CYNTHIA TUPY 5609 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 4,396.00 $14.759.41 1 1 27 1902824130003 JAMES D ALT & DEBORAH K MCKNIGHT 5617 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ - $10,363.41 1 1 N/A 1902824120001 JOANNE S GORSKI - ALKIRE & DAVID ALKIRE 5400 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120002 PAUL J SHLAFER & BARBARA S SHLAFER 5404 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ - $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120003 STRONG & KIMBERLY S STRONG 5412 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 4 500.00 $14,863.41 1 25 1902824120004 GGS & CATHERINE TRIGGS 5416 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 3 196.00 $13 559.41 1 76 1902824120005 NSE & RONALD SKANSE 5420 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10 363.41 1 WA 1902824120006 "RUSSELL ORN & ELIZABETH A DORN 5424 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10 363.41 1 N/A 1902824120007 STEWART 5428 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10 363.41 1 WA 1902824110073 KE & JEFFREY A BALKE 5429 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 4 316.00 $14 679.41 1 49 1902824120008 KRISKE & CATHERINE G KRISKE 5432 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120009 JOAN M MOONEY 5436 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110074 KATHLEEN M FLESHER 5437 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120138 BRIAN J & LINDA J DOUGHTY 5500 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,353.41 $ 2,400.00 $12,763.41 1 2 6/21/2011 1902824110011 MARK R BIRCHARD 5501 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 6,400.00 $16,763.41 1 70 CYNTHIA GEKELER STANTON & BRENT PHILIP 1902824120139 CHELGREN 5504 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 1,682.67 $12 046.08 1 N/A 1902824120140 EUGENE N BALE 5508 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.4115 $10,363.41 1 1 N/A 1902824110012 CATHERINE R BRIGGS 5509 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.411 $ $10 363.41 1 1 N/A 1902824120141 SHARON E BROWN & ANDREW R BROWN 5512 PARK PL EDINA MN 55410 $10.363.411 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110013 LORI CEDERHOLM GROTZ 5513 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 10,363.411 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120142 BARBARA L WENDT 5516 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824120143 CRAIG & LEEANNA KALSCHEUR 5520 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3 996.00 $14 359.41 1 9 6/21/2011 1902824110052 RODNEY D TEACHOUT & KATHLEEN K TEACHOUT 5523 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10 363.41 1 WA 1902824120144 ANDREW G WAY 5524 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ 2 350.00 $12,713.41 1 28 1902824110053 SARA E SWANSON 5527 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 5.132.00 $15.495.41 1 30 1902824120145 WILLIAM E HIDDING 5528 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.41 $ 2,975.00 $13,338.41 1 24 1902824120146 SUSAN V KLEVEN & BRUCE M KLEVEN 5532 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.41 $ 4,050.00 $14,413.41 1 6 6/21/2011 1902824110054 MARK G BUSYN 5533 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3,196.00 $13,559.41 1 79 1902824120147 MIA M LIEBL & DAVID M LIEBL 5536 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 2,600.00 $12,963.41 1 82 4525 PARK COMMONS ST LOUIS PARK MN 1902824110055 ERIK & KATE SCHMITT #212 55416 $10.36141 $ 1,682.67 $12,046.08 1 N/A 19028241400SR LAURA L R HEMLER & DAVID M HEMLER 5601 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $3 454.47 $ $3.454.47 0.333 N/A 1902824110064 THOMAS & MARY VON KUSTER JR 5413 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 512000 $15.483.41 1 8 6/21/2011 1902824110065 ROBIN J CARPENTER 5417 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 5!195!00 $15,558.41 1 87 1902824110075 JEREMIAH J KEARNEY 5420 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 Z510,353.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110066 R B WEIGEL & C L WEIGEL R W WEIGEL 5421 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.411 $ 3 100.00 $13,463.41 1 10 6/2112011 1902624110067 DAVID C RAMSAY 5425 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110068 KRISTINE T DONATELLE & KRISTINE T DONATELLE 100 2ND ST N E #540 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 $10 363.41 $ $10 363.41 1 N/A 1902824110105 BENJAMIN CRABTREE 5428 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.411 $ $10 363.41 1 N/A 1902824110069 MARK A BRETHEIM 8 JENNY L BRETHEIM 5429 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.411$ 4,775.00 $15,138.41 1 67 1902824110079 SARAH B MAENNER 5432 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110070 PETER MICHIELUTTI & LYNDA R MICHIELUTTI 5433 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 10.363.411 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110107 BRENDA B BECKER 5437 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10 363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110080 MARK K BORDEN & JANE S BORDEN 5440 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 2,795.20 $13,158.41 1 83 1902824110108 ROBERT J MURNEY JR 5441 WOODCRE 55424 $10,363.41 $ $10,363.41 1 WA 1902P' X83 KAREN L LANZ 5500 WOODCREST DR MN 55424 1 $10,363.411$ 4,940.20 $15,303.41 1 63 JAMES B ROTH & DEEPALI ROTH 5501 WOODCREST DR MN 55424 19021 92 $10.363.411 $ $10,363.41 1 WA REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-334 PID TAXPAYER NAME ADDRESS CITY /STATE2IP Street upgrades (Sewer and/or Water ) Total Assessment Rate REU Agreement No. ApproVed by City Council 1902824110084 SARAH A ERICKSON & RYAN -M ERICKSON 5504 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 °$ $10,363.41 1 N/A' 1902824110093 LYNNE P ROHKOHLA JAY D'ROHKOHL 5505 WOODCREST DR _ EDINA MN 55424 $10363.41 $ 8,100.00 $18463.41 1 7 '6/21/2011 1902824110085 KRISTIN ANNE & JASON STOKES 5508 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ 3900.00 $14,263.41 1 72 1902824110094 STANLEY E DAVIS 5509 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424. $10,363.41 $ 5,600.00- $15,963.41 1 19 1902824110086 JOSHUA J ROBERTS 5512 WOODCREST DR IEDINA MN 55424 $10.363.411 10 363.41 1 23 See Note 1 1902824110056. JUDITH J CARVERS 5515 WOODCREST DR I EDINA MN 55424 $10.363.411$ 4,850.00 $15,213.41 1 35 1902824110059 CRAIG D & CHELSEY GRIMES - 5516 WOODCREST DR I EDINA MN 55424 $10;363.41 $ 1,682.674 $120460 1 N /A' EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 1 13.41 1902824110060 JAMES W. ROCKWELL 5520 WOODCREST DR $10 363.41 $- $10 363.41 1 - N/A 1902824110058 JAMES R CAMPBELL & CARMEN D CAMPBELL 55211WOODCREST DR ' EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 _$ $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110061 GLENN &.CATHY CHAFFIN 5524 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 41 2,995.00 $13,358.41 1 11 6/21/2011 1902824140048 LEONARD A NELSON 5525 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 '$' $10,363.41 1 N/A 1902824110062 THOMAS J RAIH 5528 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $10,363.41 $ _ " : $10 363.41 1 . N/A 1902824140049 MARK WSHEFFERT JR 5600 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $3 454.47 $ . $3 454:47 0.333 N/A 1902824140053 IROBERT J OWEN & JUDITH K OWEN 15601 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1 $3.454.471$ $3,454.47 " 0.333. N/A .p �,a40,r r9.rc .n �ro,VVO.Wi - �c;vua,acu.ro Paz Total Project Assessment $1,989,775.51 Note 1: Property owners did not return a signed agreement STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being'the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 14, 2012, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA -334 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 17 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 14th day of September, 2012. 'P! NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED -SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT. NO. BA -334 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Oct. 2, 2012, at City Hall, 4801 W..Xh St., Edina, MN, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood: Property Identification No. The special assessment to this property is: Roadway: $17,500.00 Sewer and /or. Water Upgrades: Total Assessment: The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $1,989,775.51. The proposed assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only. notice you will receive regarding payment. Payment Options The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years at the rate of 3.1 percent. Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the Oct. 2 meeting, you may pay the assessment in one of these ways: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the City on or before Nov. 30, 2012. 2. Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment by Nov. 30, 2012. The remaining balance will be . certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable .with your real estate taxes.in 2013; with interest on the.entire assessment_at the rate of 3.1.percent- per-annurn from Oct. 2, 20'12 to Dec. `31, 2013: .3. Pay the assessment with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid by Nov. 30, 2012, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will .be payable with your real estate taxes in 2013, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 3.1 percent per annum from Oct. 2, 2012 to Dec. 31, 2013. Deferment The City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for a homestead property owned by a person age 65 or older for whom it would be a hardship to make payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office at Edina City Hall. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by Nov. 9, 2012. C Objections /Appeals If you wish to object or appeal to this assessment: I. File a signed, written objection with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing, or present the written objection to the Mayor at the assessment hearing. 2. Serve notice of the appeal to the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and file such notice with the District Court within 10 days after the notice was served to the Mayor or the City Clerk. To comment on the special assessment, you may: a Write to City of Edina, Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439. • Email to mail(g7EdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Engineering. a Attend the Oct. 2 public hearing and offer comments. If you have questions regarding the project, please call the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. If you have questions about paying your assessment, please call the Assessing Division of the Community Development Department at 952 - 826 -0365. September 14, 2012 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk PAYMENT PROCEDURE 0 If paying on or before Nov. 30, 2012, please cut and return this stub with your payment. • Make check payable to the City of Edina 0 Mail payment or pay in person: Edina City Hall, Assessing Division, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Amount Enclosed: Name: 3 Pay this amount by If not paid on or before Nov. 30, 2012, PID Impr. No. November 30, 2012, to the assessment will be placed on your avoid interest charges. property taxes at 3.1 % annual interest rate, spread out over 15 years. Amount Enclosed: Name: 3 -- 33 1902824120016 s. STEVEN W'RIDER & MARY V RIDER 5400 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120019 I . TAMARA L RICHARDSON & JONAS A RUNQUIST 5412 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120021. .'FREDERICK 'W NIEBUHR PO BOX 390108 EDINA MN 55439 1902824120013: ELDON NERHEIM 5425 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120017 1902824120018 DAVID G STOLP.ESTAD & CHRISTINA L SUSAN E GERLICHER — OLSON & . STOLPESTAD RICHARD J OLSON 5404 BROOKVIEW AVE 5408 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA.MN 55424 1902824120020 CO,NRAD LEIFUR 5416 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA, MN 55424 .1902824120014 MARK A TYSON 5421 BROOKVIEW AVE. EDINA "MN 55424 1902824120023 CONNIE L GRADY 5428 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120024 1902824120011 JOHN F'BLOODSWORTH & DIANE G PETER& STACY ENXING SENG HEACOX 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE 5432 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA WIN 55424 1902824120010 MICHAEL & STACY SULLIVAN 4536 DUPONT AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 1902824120116 TRACY K LANGEVIN & TODD `R LANGEVIN 5504 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA.MN 55424 1902824120155 'KATHLEENM"BUEGLER 5509'BROOKVIEW AVE'- EDINA MN 55424 1902824120119 WILLIAM'M MEYER & TOBIE J MEYER 5516 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA WIN 55424 1902824120115 BRUCE A MACHMEIER 5500 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120156 STEVEN D BRYAN & NATALIE S SYNHAIVSKY 550$ BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824.120118 CASSIDY R STEINER & ANDREW G STEINER 5512 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120153 THOMAS A GARTON 5517 BROOKVIEW. AVE, EDINA WIN 55424 1902824120015 ROSEMARY SIEVE & LORAS SIEVE 5417 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120022 JODY L S ROSS & DALE R ROSS 5424 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120012 BRIAN PANKRATZ 5429 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120025 ADAM J & MARGARET E GILDNER 5436 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120157 ADAM C JOHNSON & DEANNA E HARTER 5501 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120117 SHERYL BARE & ROBERT KIRK 5508 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120154 ELIZABETH M JOHNSON - MCGARRY 5513 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824.120120 JOANNE M NOVAK 5520 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 ?02824120152 1902824120121 1902824120151 ICIMAS E FISCHER & BARBARA J ROBERT A PECK & LISA E PECK TRICIA T CLARKE & DONALD E FISCHER 5524 BROOKVIEW AVE CLARKE 5521 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 5525 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120122 JAMES W STANGL & BRIDGET A STANGL - 5528 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120149 MICHAEL S TRESSLER 5533 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120150 SHADOW PROPERTIES LLC 18312 MINNETONKA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 19028241.10090 MARCY G SWENSON 5501 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110089 1902824110082 WILFRIDO R CASTANEDA & SARAH R HAROLD D COVLIN CASTANEDA 5508 DEVER DR 5505 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110087 JUSTIN A WAHLS & ANNA L WAHLS 5513 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824120055 GREG J HERNANDEZ & ANNA L HERNANDEZ 5400 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1 902824120053 SANDRA E ROSS 5405 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824110106 SCOTT A CARD & JULIE W CARD 5517, DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824120054 KATHRYN C KOESSEL 5401 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120123 JOHN C STEPHENSON 5532 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824110081 SARAH M SPENCE 5504 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110088 MICHAEL J CALVO & AMY R SCOTT 5509 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110103 NANCY J CAVEN 5521 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824120056 COLIN S & MINNA K BROOKS 5404 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120057 1902824120052 WILLIAM E-MCDONALD & MARYAN PATRICK E FLANAGAN M MCDONALD 5409 KELLOGG AVE 5408 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 5412 KELLOGG AVE 1902824120058 1902824120051 1902824120059 REBECCA MCCAUGHEY & MARK RICHARD J SHEEHAN & ELIZABETH A TRACY L HOLTAN MCCAUGHEY SHEEHAN 5416 KELLOGG AVE 5412 KELLOGG AVE 5413 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120050 1902824120060 1902824120049 SUZY S KRONFELD BAUM & DAVID R DAVID G PARRY BARRY STREIT & KELLY STREIT BAUM 5420 KELLOGG AVE 5421 KELLOGG AVE 5417 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120061 DORIS ANDERSON 5424 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120063 WILLIAM R LUNGER & LAURA A LUNGER 5432 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120048 PATRICK T LEE 5425 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120047 FERDINANDA L OTNESS 5433 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120062 THOMAS C BERINGER 5428 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120064 KAREN R. TAYLOR 5436 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120046 MARK T SULLIVAN & JULIE G SULLIVAN 5437 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120075 PAUL J DONNAY THREE LLC 4655 63RD AVE N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 1902824120076 1902824120113 NANCY, K CARLILE & CHRISTOPHER S BHARAT CHARAN CARLILE 5505 KELLOGG -AVE 5504 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120112 GAIL'M COLLINS 5509, KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120079 GORDON. E & KATHY L OTTERLEI 4207 52ND ST W EDINA MN 55439 1902824120109 NICHOLAS J SOLINGER & LISA L SOLINGER 5521 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120082 MICHAEL M & AMY K STAGGS 5528 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120106 MARGARET P GALBR.AITH 5313 320TH ST CUSHING MN 56443 1902824130070 PAMELA E SCHWIER & JAMES.G SCHWIER 5600- KELLOGG PIL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130063 ROBERT J DALY & KAREN E DALY 5605 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120078 BRUCE C RUSSELL 5512 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424` 1902824120110 DANIEL J GIONET & ANDREA S GIONET 5517 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120081 SARAH J GRIFFIN & GREGORY J PFLASTER 5524 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120107 MARGARET A REYNOLDS 5529 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120084• JOANNE MCRAE 5536 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130062 IDONA M DARKENWALD & CLEMENT B DARKENWALD 5601 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130068. ANDREW C TEITSCHEID & AMY J TEITSCHEID 5608 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 ?02824130066 1902824130065 ;YAN T& ARON M BARNETT CHRISTINE A VANDONGEN 5616 KELLOGG PL 5620 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120114 - JAMES C & KELLY A JACKSON 5501 KELLOGG. AVE EDINA MN.55424 . 1902824120077 MARY E KOTTKE 901 MARQUETTE AVE #2700 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 1,902824120.111 . KATHRYN A MERTZ & DONALD. K MERTZ 5513 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120080 CAROLYN R COCHRANE & ANDREW S COCHRANE 5520 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120108 JOHN PLOTNICKY 5525 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120083 MARY ELLEN BRATTLAND 5532 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120105 DIANE N SPANGLER & DAVID R SPANGLER 5537 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130069 JACKIE K DUM'MER & DALE M DUMMER 5604 KELLOGG PL .EDINA MN 55424 1902824130067 DONALD E LAREAU 5612 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130061 SCOTT D ASPENSON & AMANDA K ASPENSON' 5625 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130064 1902824120036 1902824120035 TODD S EMERSON & AUDRA M O THOMAS K BROWER & PETRA S BRYAN D COLWELL EMERSON BROWER 5401 OAKLAWN AVE 5628 KELLOGG PL 5400 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120037 1902824120034 1902824120038 RONALD L KALIEBE & CAROL B MARY L DYKSTRA & DENNIS D JOHN R CRABTREE FLINT - KALIEBE DYKSTRA 5408 OAKLAWN AVE 5404 OAKLAWN AVE 5405 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120033 1902824120039 1902824120032 ROCKY B OSBORN & JENNIFER A GLORIA L SULLIVAN KATHRYN A BENNETT & EDWARD L OSBORN 5412 OAKLAWN AVE BENNETT 5409 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 5413 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120040 1902824120031 1902824120041 LOU A GILBERT KRISTEN D SUTLEY & DANIEL E RODNEY G THOLE & CAROL J THOLE, 5416 OAKLAWN AVE LEPTUCK TRSTES OF THOLE FMLY REV TRS EDINA MN 55424 5417 OAKLAWN AVE 220 COLLIER BLVD S #501 EDINA MN' 55424 MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 1902824120030 1902824120042 1902824120029 SAMUEL PACE MARJORIE A ADLER KENT P FREDRICKSON 5421 OAKLAWN AVE 5424 OAKLAWN AVE 35 OXFORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 CLARENDON HILLS IL 60514 1902824120043 1902824120028 1902824120044 STEVEN L SEVERSON & SARA E MARIA K EGGEMEYER JOHN FALLDIN SEVERSON 5429 OAKLAWN AVE 5432 OAKLAWN AVE 5428 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120027 1902824120045 1902824120026 MAUREEN O ENGER REFINED LLC NANCY H KING & DOUGLAS E KING 5433 OAKLAWN AVE 5905 FAIRFAX AVE 5437 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120095 1902824120134 1902824120096. GORDON R HILLEQUE & EMILY RICHARD W WEIGE SHAWN K OLSEN & DANA R OLSEN ERUSHA HILLEQUE 5501 OAKLAWN AVE 5504 OAKLAWN AVE 5500 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120133 1902824120097 1902824120132 KELLY INGVALDSON & ERIC CAROLINE E OSTROM & JOHN E SUSAN L MORK INGVALDSON KARTHAUS 5509 OAKLAWN AVE 5505 OAKLAWN AVE 5508 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120098 1902824120131 1902824120099 WILLIAM H KELLY & CARYN E KELLY CELESTE A GERVAIS CAROLYN DONNELLY 5512 OAKLAWN AVE 5513 OAKLAWN AVE 5516 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120130 LISA L CARVER & JONATHAN A ._CARVER 5517 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120101 THOMAS P DAVIS & BRIDGET W DAVIS 5524 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120127 CHRISTOPER C LONG 5529 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120104 CATHY. L REED 5536 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130001 PATRICIA M VAYDA & DOUGLAS W VAYDA 5601 OAKLAWN AVE DINA MN 55424 1902824120001 JOANNE S GORSKI - ALKIRE & DAVID ALKIRE 5400 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120004 JAMES TRIGGS & CATHERINE TRIGGS 5416 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120007 JEFFREY O STEWART 5428 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120009 JOAN M MOONEY 5436 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 -)02824110011 ,ARK R BIRCHARD 5501 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120100 JOSEPHINE BAUER 5520 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120128 HEIDI V WENNEN & DARREN J WENNEN 5525 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120103 HARRIET E BUSDICKER 5532 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120125 ROBERT H DALY & LAURA Z DALY 5537 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA.MN 55424 1902824130002 ROBERT DOUG GREEN & CYNTHIA TUPY 5609 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120002 PAUL J SHLAFER & BARBARA S SHLAFER 5404 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120005 TANYA SKANSE & RONALD SKANSE 5420 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110073: LISA C BALKE & JEFFREY A BALKE 5429 PARK PL " EDINA MN 55424 1902824110074 KATHLEEN M FLESHER 5437 PARK PL ' EDINA MN 55424 1902824120139 CYNTHIA GEKELER STANTON & BRENT PHILIP CHELGREN 5504 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120129 KARI FINBERG- SCHOOLER 5521 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120102 SHADOW PROPERTIES LLC 18312 MINNETONKA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 1902824120126 BRIAN A BELANGER 5533 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130060 RAYMOND J BOOK & JULIE A PARKE 5600 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130003 JAMES D ALT & DEBORAH K MCKNIGHT 5617 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120003 RUSSELL B STRONG & KIMBERLY S STRONG 5412 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120006 SCOTT R DORN & ELIZABETH A DORN 5424 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120008 PATRICK M KRISKE & CATHERINE G KRISKE 5432 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120138 BRIAN J & LINDA J DOUGHTY 5500 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120140 EUGENE N BALE 5508 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110012 1902824120141 1902824110013 CATHERINE R BRIGGS SHARON E BROWN & ANDREW R LORI CEDERHOLM GROTZ 5509 PARK PL BROWN 5513 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 5512 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55410 1902824120142 1902824120143 1902824110052 BARBARA L WENDT CRAIG & LEEANNA KALSCHEUR RODNEY D TEACHOUT & KATHLEEN 5516 PARK PL 5520 PARK PL K TEACHOUT EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 5523 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120144 1902824110053 1902824120145 ANDREW G WAY SARA E SWANSON WILLIAM E HIDDING 5524 PARK PL 5527 PARK PL 5528 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824120146 1902824110054 1902824120147 SUSAN V KLEVEN & BRUCE M MARK G BUSYN MIA M LIEBL & DAVID M LIEBL KLEVEN 5533 PARK PL 5536 PARK PL 5532 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110055 1902824140052 1902824110064 ERIK & KATE SCHMITT LAURA L R HEMLER & DAVID M THOMAS & MARY VON KUSTER JR 4525 PARK COMMONS #212 HEMLER 5413 WOODCREST DR ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 5601 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110065 1902824110075 1902824110066 ROBIN J CARPENTER JEREMIAH J KEARNEY R B WEIGEL & C L WEIGEL, R W 5417 WOODCREST DR 5420 WOODCREST DR WEIGEL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 5421 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110067 1902824110068 1902824110105 DAVID C RAMSAY KRISTINE T DONATELLE & KRISTINE T BENJAMIN CRABTREE 5425 WOODCREST DR DONATELLE 5428 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 100 2ND ST N E #540 EDINA MN 55424 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 1902824110069 1902824110079 1902824110070 MARK A BREfHEIM & JENNY L SARAH B MAENNER PETER MICHIELUTTI & LYNDA R BRETHEIM 5432 WOODCREST DR MICHIELUTTI 5429 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 5433 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110107 1902824110080 1902824110108 BRENDA B BECKER MARK K BORDEN & JANE S BORDEN ROBERT J MURNEY J 5437 WOODCREST DR 5440 WOODCREST DR 5441 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110083 1902824110092 1902824110084 KAREN L LANZ JAMES B ROTH & DEEPALI ROTH SARAH A ERICKSON & RYAN M 5500 WOODCREST DR 5501 WOODCREST DR ERICKSON EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 5504 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110093 1902824110085 LYNNE P ROHKOHL & JAY D KRISTIN ANNE & JASON STOKES ROHKOHL 5508 WOODCREST DR 5505 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110086 1902824110056 JOSHUA J ROBERTS JUDITH J CARVER 5512 WOODCREST DR 5515 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824110057 1902824110060 STAN GEYER &;BEVERLY L GEYER & JAMES W ROCKWELL ANNIE E GREGORAK ' 5520 WOODCREST DR 5200 FRANCE AVE #4 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55410 ` 1902824110061 1902824140048 GLENN & CATHY CHAFFIN LEONARD A.NELSON 5524 WOODCREST DR 5525 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824140049 MARK W SHEFFERT JR 5600 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824140053 ROBERT J OWEN & JUDITH K OWEN 5601 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110094 STANLEY E DAVIS 5509 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110059 CRAIG D & CHELSEY GRIMES 5516 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110058 JAMES R-CAMPBELL & CARMEN D CAMPBELL 5521 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110062 THOMAS J RAIH 5528 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-121 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -334 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest -at a rate of 3.1 % per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2013. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Levy No. 18279 15 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor; partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the. special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall. be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 16th day of October, 2012 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metrq $oulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Resolution No. 2012 -121 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1 I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and- foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 2012 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular. Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk Agreements Signed by owners Approved by City Council June 21-, 2011 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I day of , 20 `, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, • a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and N1: i<,e— Qo,-k V <3- , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 6, Block 21, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5509 Dever Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co: of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,400.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services, 5790 Quam Ave NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1698 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. i 698 for the amount of $2,400.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,400.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper, Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 James B. Hovland,' Mayor (SEAL) AND Nea , City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN .) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a ` day of 20 (, , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City MarWger of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. /6L NOTARY PUBLIC sloa'is . 419. PROPERTY OWNER: .. . N39M V030 MIN. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instr ment i 20� , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1 380 Corporate Center Curare gan, Minnesota 55121 .`alephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn GWEN A. RRET SMITH ". Notary Public State of Minnesota My Commission Expires +• ,m •• January 31, 2016 2 w 91�3A o et2, v � .3y •rte Q• cbxroa � PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of y ��� , 20 t , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and T) iAL3 ►p (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1, Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5500 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,400.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services, 5790 Quam Ave NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement 'and Purchase Order No. 1699 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1699 for the amount of $2,400.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,400.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www,C-ityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 James B. Hovland, .Mayor AND co H. a City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 'The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisoZt'jf day of 20L, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Mar6ger of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DEBRA MAPICEN V. .• WTAMPUBLIC•NIIMOTA • IllyCov eE'=Am 91,2015 ::.. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( s's. COUNTY OF 'e��� �^) ,—,---The foregoing instrument was \'Uo v2. , 20A-, by — DRAFTED ;BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center '386 Corporate Center Curve -agan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (61 2) 452 -5000 RNK:srn r NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWN k ovule ged b fore met day of 51Ad%,--- && NOTARY PUBLIC 2 OHARM ALAWM 1j� • ?100fiPORAT£9 IBBtl /Ii^ PE ID Y � ®y� \ 0i... 0132011 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I O * day of J yNC—i , 20 < < , by and betwe the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 41 Block 1, of Colonial Square having a street address of 5605 Kellogg PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of th Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,500.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1665 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1665 for the amount of $4,500.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 (SEAL) AND colt eal, Ci anager STATE OF MINNESOTA. ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ` ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. j NOT PUBLIC PROP TY OWNER: 9VMLWlQKUW LW -,4 STATE, OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument w� 20_LL, by — DRAFTED BY: - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve igan, Minnesota .55121 dephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn acknowled ed before me this- day of LIC 2,. nnnn Wo St1AROM K MCKU D NftyNftftM 0 ��nm�eetonFi�e�.l�►Sf,'Otb PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this � day of v titi > , 20 , by and between the CITY .MINA a Mi nesorjr�, nicipal corporation ( "City ") and Qi,. ��'� i , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2., Block 1, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5508 Dever Rd, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost L the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,700.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1695 was issued to the Contractor. The wort: is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1695 for the amount of $3,700.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,700.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper, Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofE�ina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 (SEAL) AN Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The forego g instrument was acknowledged before me this day of L-- , 20 ` , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Hager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. „�. SHEILA MARIE CRAMER Nntary Public k� ;t Minnesota 1,4y CO:Tirnlssion Expires January 31, 2012 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: (1A Dill) C4 ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve gan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of w91�1r� • `�mn d. Ewa . � !0 %IAA 11Ni � 4� 5 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �` �E�� of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of ;_ JOP , 20_[L, by and betwee the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and 1 C Dg��>� �"j�� , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 31 Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5408 Brookview Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11-5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer & water and has requested that the City assess th cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,675.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1006 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1006 for the amount of $5,675.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,675.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 fames-rs. rioviana, mayor (SEAL) Scott H. - .- STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss: COUNTY OF,HENNEPIN ) The foregoing_instrumert was acknowledged before me this',,')day of 20�, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and' City Man . er of the City of'Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. " DEBRA MANGEN NOTARY PUBLIC .. �..' NOTARY pUBLIC•MINNESOTA . .' My C0mmI sion Expires Jan. 31, 2015 PROP OWNER: 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) r (ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing "instrument was acknowledged before me this i day of 20, by Cc " . f 62n °t- (�- N TAR PUBLIC DRAFTED BY:, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association q =WGW 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve ,gan, Minnesota 55121 -a ------ ----------- =_ ------ . "alephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm 2 'W91N�11� o V '� .by • ,CORPOB �O PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and (;? r V c e ALE V1-=N , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5532 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,050.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1037 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1037 for the amount of $4,050.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,050.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952-826-0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) A Scott H. Neal, City Man ger The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .20 11, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manad6r of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DEBRA MANGEN NOTARY PUBLIC • M WESOTA My Cwwftsion Expires Jan. 31, 2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF jla4!W,'k%- ) MIF PROPERTY WNER: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11- day of c)0no— , 201 t , by L3rrtce 1,gevz., avn,, &, row, KLe_v,a,-, DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve pagan, Minnesota 55121 :lephone: (612) 452 -5000 r<NK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC CHARTRIE VODNG Notary Publ ,... Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 4 U) NCO �y �ORroM T &EIIED SUN 14 2011 C1�19F ED'" PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of iyrie, , 20_LL, by and between the CITY OF ED INA a Minnesota munici al corporation ( "City ") and r I. ��„ ,husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3, Block 3, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5505 Woodcrest Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost c the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,100.00 (the " "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1020 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the Citv referring to Purchase Order No. 1020 for the amount of $8,100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF E James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AN Scott H. Neal, City M nager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20LL, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Ma ger of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DEBRA MANGEN ~ �,z NOTARYPUBUC-MINNESOTA MY won Expires Jan. 31, 2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF ) \ The foregoing instrument JUy1e, ,20jU_,by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve igan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBEIG PROPERTY OWNER: acknowledged before me this i & day of ARY 2 IMUaQuYu05S NOTAWKSIC-URNMA 8 4'91NA �1 a 0 • �HRIR�N.T60 RECEIVE ►141011 .. r OF EQIPd;: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ENSiNEFRin °e r; .. City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of I'A z , 2011 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and F Ito, ,AQ5 W . van K-e-.rwz 7R M., 51.5 4A1 Von/ eu.11-rce- , husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of.: Lot 21 Block 1, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5413 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of th Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,920.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1669 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1669 for the amount of $5,120.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,120.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. - BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper" Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF >HENNEPIN CITY OF James t� Hovland, Mayor ANDS Scott H: Neal, City anager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o�?- day of 1.4 i 20 L1, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Ma ger of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal`corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. N TARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF 4ha ) The foregoing instrument JcWe , 20 fl, by DRAFTED BY: - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve ,igan, Minnesota 55121 ,''elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn PROPERTY OWNER: acknowled ed before me this ��� day of g_ Y NOTARY PUBLIC 2 LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARYPUBUC- MINNESOTA My ComMssion Expires Jan. 31, 2016 w91N�11� l.bR %MTE a PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I "' day of &I� , 20-�L, y and e e e CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and 4 (�= S husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 6, Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5520 Park PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of th Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,996.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1682 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1682 for the amount of $3,996.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,996.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1+ FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEclina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF (SEAL) 1 Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Ne , City Mapfager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a 1At- day of 20 1 l , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DEBRA MANGEN _ K= NOTAW PueLIC. MINNESOTA MY Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF�' t.►�) The foregoing instrument was ack , 201L, by Wi 1) DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve .gan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn PROPERTY OWNER: ed before me this 94_A-_ day of NO Y PUBLIC 2 Mia &MRONKWK�q lib�►Pliilo-Mn�ol� O1Ca1r1�n6�1�tJ�►�1.010 w9�NA o� e � SON J PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT _ City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20_�L, by and betweeil the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corpo ation ( "City ") and 6I1� Jq y y lam hurb md and wife (the "Pr perty Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5, Block 1, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5421 Woodcrest Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co, of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1008 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1008 for the amount of $3,100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND cott H. Nea , City M ger The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I.Q day of 20_jj by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Man Aber of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DEBRA MANGEN NOTAW PURIC•MINNESOTA NOTARY PUBLIC ;.. � MY Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2015 PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument 20 /1 ,by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve gan, Minnesota 55121 ;lephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn acknowledged Pefore me this '"l ,— day of 2 MRDSFIARONKWI AM MARA, �a11�ne�1e " A�jrOa+lnlweaB�pl�i►�b>� 4'91N��j� e PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of _ J i w r , 20J, by and between the CITY O DINA, M' cta municipal corporation ("City") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3., Block 2, of Colonial Grove Fifth Add'n having a street address of 5524 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. - The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced water and has requested that the City assess the cost of th. Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,995.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1680 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the'City referring to Purchase Order No. 1680 for the amount of $2,995.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,995.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Properi, Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, ) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND ott N& AI, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before.me this D1,of_ day of 20_L 1, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Man er of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council DEBRA MANGEN NOTARY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA \ My Qrnrnission Expires Jan. 31, 2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF fffvkvle �') he.,foregoing instrument was x , 20_ by L G DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office. Center 380 Corporate Center Curve agan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn '� ILI LOA A . PROPERTY OWNER: j - P"11 =jj1j ie this, of NOTARY PUBLIC 2 ... .. E INAMMILALLOW Agreements Signed by owners TO.be approved by City Council /2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this r day of J A-1 `- , 20_LL, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Clem & Idona Darkenwald, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3, Block 1, Colonial Square having a street address of 5601 Kellogg PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin 1424 Third St. No., ' Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1666 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1666 for the amount of $6,800.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,800.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.eov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James -B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL). AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA (.ss. y COUNTY OF HENNEPIN . ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l qON, day of 20 / , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Hager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 201 , by NO Y PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: n CAMPBELL KNUTSON'�* , Professional Association" 317 Eagandale Office Center�%I� 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota `55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this a day of 20 y and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and +�' •'�► �� , �rui#®•(the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7, Block 9, of South Harriet Park having a. street address of 5424 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,650.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1326 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1326 for the amount of $4,650.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The .City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,650.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The. Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement.shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded againO the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov 9 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, ,Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland 'and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Ma,nager,of:the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) .(ss. COUNTY OF L!N) Thj�e foregoing instrument w s acknowledge4�� fiRre me this a`t�,� day of �IOer , 20lQ,,, by k V1 QnV i T [� NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON SWiICTersau Professional Association VIMNMW- 341 AWUW 317 Eagandale.Office Center NOS'", -11 NO �. 1380. Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota '55121; Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 I�roHPOa �g9 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of kL� , 20 by andbetween th CITY O INA, a innes to municipal corporafFbn ( "City ") and 0, �� ftkNe O r lk , husband and wife (the "Prope Owner'). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 20, Block 13 of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5501 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the coF' of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4.600.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So, Minneapolis, MN 55406, (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement: Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1009 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1009 for the amount of $4,600.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 4f1- 1*gainst the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Nroject No. ENG *11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. -Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Properfi Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded again the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA. C�2 BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City. Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 I' 1 , by James B. Hovland and by ScottH:, Neal; respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a' Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to. the authority granted by its City Council. r NOTARY PU IC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) `' (ss.i COUNTY OF `'/0P�1 ) . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o?� day of 20 II , by r�i dI0 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srrn' NOTARY PIOLIC x �r s� t =z• TERRI JO WILSON Notary Public-Minnesota My Coff=LWon Expim Jan 91, 2015 )�91, 2 /9 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this �p day of ()Ctft6er , 2012�_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Stanley Davis, (the Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4 Block 3, Shady Pines Addn having a street address of 5509 Woodcrest, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject. Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $9,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin 1424 Third St. North Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1017 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1017 for the amount of 5600.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.., 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,600.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. . ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 ..n.n,rPAinamV vnv • 952 -R26-0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 "ny (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY O (14)( ss. 14 ) (ss. -The foregoing instrument 20 by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professionai Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve -Eagan, Minnesota 55121. Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Stanley Davis i wledg before me this i day of, `� NOTARY PUBLIC 2 SHARON R ALLISON NOTAiiYP SIXaMINNESOTA VY WNJ1L31,2015 PUBLIC IMAPNROVEMENT City of Edilia SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of ,— , 20, by nd etween t OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (" '.) and I �IQ /in 1 husband and wife (the "Property Owner".). RECITALS .A. ' ...Property Owner is the owner of lot B., Block 14.. of South Harriet Park having a street address of .5528 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). 9, The City has requested that :Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the. trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the .right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement') '.and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 =5. G. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE; IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS .FOLLOWS, 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,975.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Seaver & Water, 323.3 45th Ave. So.., Mpls, MN 55406 .(the "Contractor") to construct the .Public Improvement. Property Owner entered Into a contract With the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1000 was Issued to the Contractor. . The work 'is completed and the Contractor 'has .submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No: 1000 for the amount of $2,975.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2.- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City Will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 2975.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the-special assessments and.-to the Public Improvement and to City Project No..ENG 11 -5, Including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the .assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST SOTH STREET FAX 952- 826 -039A EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedln8.corn TTY 952 - 826 -0379 D�3yi'L•1 y 4171 ffd BY: (SEAL) (:12191 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF S� ) NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: M The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z-7—, day of 201y, by U) i7 L L d N ARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn gJANEEN M. BRUUN Notary Public - Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I`1 - day of by and between the CITY . Y OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") Ad R. B. Strong and K. S. Strong, husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4, Block 7, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5412 Park PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,200.00 . (the "Project Cost") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1683 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1683 for the amount of $4,500.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City. Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING bEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) =►I STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF Uf ) The foregoing instrument was c�u , 20 _a, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale,Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC A�-" K. & Strong I L. +V) 2 ALYSA MARIEVAESMEA NOTARY PUBLIC - IN8�90TA W COMMISSlON.MM0041118 M�9 YE® DEC 12 2011 CITY OF EDlNA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT q4 b) AGREEMENT made this day of Y' O y , 20 1 ��,Dan�dD ween the CITY OF ED,INA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and �� Pe-, e - j,J�ne,� , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 14, Block 13, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5525 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the c of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,950.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1328 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1328 for the amount of $2,950.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,950.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Prop Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agL the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott'H.'Neal, City Manager (ss. COUNTY OF'HENNEPIN .) Theloregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of �C61>ti -vim , 20 &, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H: Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority, granted by its City Council. LYAIETTE BIUNNO NOT RY PUBLIC N=FW PUBLIC -MWNWA W— I W Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA PROPERTY OWNER: t ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center,Curve Eagan, Minnesota, 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARYPUBLIC 2 PUBIC uvlrrcwcw1r-w I AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT —,-j -- - - - - - -- AGREEMENT made this -7 day of 0 , 20 ]L, by and between the CITY OFDINA , Mi nesgta� mu icipal corporation ( "City ") and / ! , husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS��� A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2, Block 1, of Edwards Addition having a street address of 5609 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement) and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,396.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water Inc. P.O. Box 247 Loretto MN 55357 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1674 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1674 for the amount of $4,396.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,396.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Pror Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded ag the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET �gr��r��r.C�tyOfEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) _►o STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this f f 14 day of 1 eCe0Jh -eV , 20 F 1 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. &7 TARY PUBLIC LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUgW-MiNNESO?A My Commmion Expires Jan. 31, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) PROPERTY OWNER: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of ow e 0 m ` "m„FO�w�y9• ..a RECEIVED 26 201 CITY DF EDINIk L PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 7 .1. , 201L, by and between the CITY T DINA, a Mi ne of m ��� cporatio ( "City ") and plc pR ,husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7, Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5524 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the c of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,200.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services 5790 Quam Ave NE St. Michael, MN 55376 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1002 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1002 for the amount of $2,350.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,350.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Pror Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded ag, the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) Wl STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OFzrL►ui,.�,,� ) Q�Z foregoing instrument 20JLL, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY WNER: a°, me this _7A day of NOTeY PUBLIC 0i EllMCl�ly 11 won left jastm .411 �.10 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT , ` AND ��I�� O� �'�C:�Illl SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 20_LL by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (" ity ") and Caryn & William Kelly, husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4, Block 12, , of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5512 Oaklawn Ave, Ed -ina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property, NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of 4 940.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ellingson Drainage P.O. Box 68, West Concord, MN 55985 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1330 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1330 for the amount of $4,940.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,940.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project'No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 I FAX 952 - 826.0390 4801 WEST SOTH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofL(Iiiia.coni TTY 952 -826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, city Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland. and by Scott N. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ►� ) NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNERS: y, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ 20_1L, by , �nj KeAt"j— DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Offlce Center 1360 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK!srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 $I,I.KVEEM NOTARY PUBLIC • MLNNWA �Iy�oMad{S$IQI�p(PIAES1�31f20f3 day of /tr A., 49�°�lU o e s; O ,a0 r• �ti Cry„ ,i�J:l 30 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Jadiria AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 215, day of f ✓C/f , 20 1 f , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and �''�Q,ro -- Su "tgdy�,- , husbaad -and -wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2, Block 8, of Colonial Grove Third Addition having a street address of 5527 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) . from the , trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their, sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against. the. Subject Property. _ NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,132.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ellingson Drainage P.O. Box 68 West Concord, MN 55985 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public. Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1329 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1329 for the amount of $5,132.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,132.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING; This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors, and assigns.; .This. Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. C 1 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdinA.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA MN (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9 _ day of 0! - &be. , 20A, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUIJLIC PROPERTY OWNER: GRETAT. OPHOVEN Notary Public Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF -P'1'� vl ) The foregoing instrument was ackno% ()c40 , 20JL, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn SW a.in So r, before me this day of OTARY PL J BLIC N 4,9SN�1j'y. e 1 Cn o 1`J .ay PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT � , 20 (�, b and between the CITY AGREEMENT made this � day of Y OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporati n ( "City ") ands :- 9 R t7 G E-T- ` o AVA S , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7, Block 12, of South Harriet.Park having a street address of 5524 Oaklawn, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the c Of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, ,IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,100-00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1323 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an .invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1323 for the amount of $3,100.00- The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work p e nForm. ed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 11100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Prop Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded % the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall 1 FAX 952- 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor. (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal,.City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (' ss: COUNTY OF"HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged' before me this day of 20 , by James B.; Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: f STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was o ledged 'bef e e this ; 20_ /I by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional. Association �r '� S'NA. BENEDICT 317 Eagandale, Office Center WoTARY PLIEM 1380 Corporate Center Curve _ MINNESOTA, Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 EMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT 'Ir Iva., ,y of Edina AGREEMENT made this day of JUG , 20L, by and between the CITY O DIN a �it esot municipal corporation ( "City ") and ���� ' �� Mc-�� ,husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 71 Block 2 of Colonial Square having a street address of 5604 Kellogg PI., Edina, Minnesota (the Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement) and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer & water and has requested that the City assess cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,500.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water 3233 45th Ave. So. , Mpls MN 55406 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1667 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1667 for the amount of $6,500.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing, requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. and assigns. This nAgreelmen binding may be upon ecorded ac, Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors 9 the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 -826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) { ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,day of 20 : , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corpora" orporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: " kt, �1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) I�A'V( ss. CO UNTY OF jw. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me:ithis 4� day, of 20, by i iS-tu' / �t�� NOTAKY.VUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center LUNETTE BIUNNO 1380 Corporate Center Curve WTA'PMUC -Mir q 7-agan, Minnesota 55121 WC0M &SjM&PkMJmM. 2016 felephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this �p day of , 20_LL, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporatio ( "City ") and �c.c�st! LI >O\ Ina , husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 15, Block 12, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5521 Kelloqq Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,750.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. 3233 45th Ave. So. , Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1685 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1685 for the amount of $4,750.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,750.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3.. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agains" the title to the Subject Property. 952 -927 -8861 City Hall 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 0* CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager d(,p,, ®��® FyGirypFFp�J V01t STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me :this day of =20 , by Jdrnes,6. Hovland and'by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor. and City Man r of the_Gity of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on' behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF .1AM'q61'4 ) The foregoing instrument was acknc _,`20 by DRAFTED. BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve agan; Minnesota 55121 felephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn Aged before me this �'.' day of PUBLIC 2 L'fNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC• MINNESOTA MYQMMiMi0n,ExpiM' Jan. 31,2016 r vva,.w Novel . - .... ... _... , AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of G , 20 6 I , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and husband and wife (the "Properly Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 8, Block 13, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5528 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ('Public Improvement) and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENO 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,295.00 (the "Project Cost) from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1687 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1687 for the amount of $3,295.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,295.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded ag the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com (SEAL) CITY OF EDINA AND James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City - Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The. foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20` , by James. B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant,to'the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPS OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY "OF'' `,A The foregoing instrument was acknowledged, before me this. : , day of 20 tl , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317:Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (61'2) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 is PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �'�°� City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ` Y" day of d % l , 20jL, by and between the CITY F EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Ar �� �� �� husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1, Block 1, of Colonial Grove Fifth Add'n having a street address of 5515 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin 1424 Third St North Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1677 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1677 for the amount of $4,850.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and.will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,850.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com CI1y OF EJDO 4 2011 ENGINEERING C!! r Fi ;�Grr� �D DINA 75 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �'�°� City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ` Y" day of d % l , 20jL, by and between the CITY F EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Ar �� �� �� husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1, Block 1, of Colonial Grove Fifth Add'n having a street address of 5515 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin 1424 Third St North Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1677 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1677 for the amount of $4,850.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and.will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,850.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com (SEAL) CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE.OF`MINNESOTA ) (.ss. COUNTY, OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged. before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manage, of the City `of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on, behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 1. LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA LQMy Commission Expires Jan; 31, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY'OF ) Ir NO ARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: The.foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20' , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY. CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve - 'Eagan; Minnesota 55121. Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 491��j''lr • `N�Reo���0 e �FcFi PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT � of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this :7!U day of , 20 /1, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minn of unici a corpo tion ( "City ") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 19, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5405 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement') and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,125.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1035 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1035 for the amount of $5,125.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,125.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agains' the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA . CJ (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was , 20 1/ , by - DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: �� 1 before me this o�D day of i l �&h .. TERRI JO WILSON Notary PubRo- Minnesota My Comm>s5wn dreg ,an 31, 2013 2 11.�, N y SEP 19 V1 QF EDINA (? �i • �M1 b0 mReaa .,'I: DEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 \ , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnes to municip corporation ("City") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner'). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1. Block 9, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5400 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer sere ce''line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the r ` of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,995.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin 1424 Third St North Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1003 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor. has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1003 for the amount 0995. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,995.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081: 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded aga, --,t the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 �) 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The fo egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �_ day of 204, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON BETH HUGHES Professional Association �'° UURAEViA INNESOTA 317 Eagandale Office Center NOTARY PUBEVIMM�31,2014 1380 Corporate Center Curve MICOffinwo Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 w9sN�.r� ° H�o ay FIMCEWED 6 2011 • I��bRPOM,�E9 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of I/ , 20a, by and between the CITY OF EDINA; a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and t:Vl G �(alkAgh ke11V A/�i1i1 ,husband and wife (the "Property OvVier"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 19, Block 13, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5505 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement') and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the c of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,650.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1013 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1013 for the amount of $4,650.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,650.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Prop, Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded aga. the title to the Subject Property. City all 952- 927 -8861 y FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEina.com CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) ►p STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) � i� (ss. COUNTY O U IVI 1 ) The foregoin instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn valds�� roc. Ong SARA ANN BUESGENS MyConrNMME NAMM2 0) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT Lfty Ot LcIffia AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 1 r , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and PhAs rrn ate 5cAo, FR,rJ , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7, Block 10, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5524 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cc,-'* of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $1,995.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1700 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1700 for the an ,ount of $1,995.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $1,995.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded. agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA go (SEAL) _►D STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14 day of Dim b-t( , 2011 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City M rager of the City. of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF i e, /)r)• ) The foregoing instrument Nt -V') , 20 l/ , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTAAY PUIKIC PROPERTY OWNER: re me this 14 day of NOTARY PUBLIC F) Mary L. Jenkins NOTARY PUBLIC State of Minnesota ur Comnsson Eons 1- 31 -2015 .ry'91N�11.,�, ok a fit' �RroBM�T B RECEIVE, ,;IiL 5 2011 , l.i:� E��= PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT �' of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of c�J1, , 20A I bYY�� Edd between he CITY OF EDINA, a Mi ota nicipal corporation ( "City ") and IIM cty qr �� A 0. , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 31 Block 10, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5408 Kellogg Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer & water and has requested that the City assess cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,600.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Beniamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1679 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1679 for the amount of $8,600.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,600.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper` Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai, the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA W (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: l Y j: 1go , As STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ZAh f ) 1 6t 1. The foregoing instrument was ack owledged before me this day of 20 by TRY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center LYNETTE BIUNNO 1380 Corporate Center Curve P1OTARYPUBIIC- MINf�SOTA Eagan, Minnesota 55121 MiC01m�^FxPftsJW31.9016 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn [C] w o e `i� • ,��bRPOM2�9 �ee0 SP 12 2011 rr Y OF EDINP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT '-----'City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _ day of �SX aJ:9,,M,) e r , 20 I , by and between the CITY OF E INA, a Mi nesota m nicipal corporatio City") (" ityity") and ,T h [L KIDIESS f I , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 20, Block 9, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5401 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,550.00 (the "Project Cost") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1004 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1004 for the amount of $8,550.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,550.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA . Am James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of.th'e City.of Edina, a Minnesota,municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befor me this, day of , 20A, , by i it NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Association ar TERRI JO WILSON . :. Professional p : Notary PubfiAAinnesota at. 317 Eagandale Office Center r.;wr MrcoM F*►esaens,,2o13 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 4�9jN�,r� o� e U) � ♦� 69 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT � f Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of .2 r 3 20 i i , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 007, Block 10, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5424 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. - The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,600.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1001 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and th Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1001 for the amount oiP600. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and wili pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount o4�'600 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the 'Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 (SEAL) CITY OF EDINA AND James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20LI _, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.. LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUSUC•MWNEWTA My Com ftm &PftS JM, 31,2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) r NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of w9� A,r� o� e s2 • f ^�RBP80� T9� • � � Q PUBLIC IMPROVEMEN City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 'ST day of SgPl�MrOK , 201 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and DA%/'U 9e 13A W tl►d SUzZy Kadrel -P -94UA , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 16, Block 9, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5417 KeiloQg Ave, (Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City asse --° the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC, IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1007 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1007 for the amount of 5600. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,600.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA FMA (SEAL) UZIND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of respe 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, ctively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) Th foregoing instrument r_ 91 , 20�, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC PROPE OWNER: 2 0 r ,r� oe PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT city Of Edina clay of u,�-� , 20 1, by and WNW n I� AGREEMENT made this ._ "" and E ' N Minneseta Iclpal corporafii ('�CRY'�) Owner "). husband and wife (the "Prope R CITA Block 12 of So Warne Park having ra street p. Property Owner is the owner of Lv � -, � address of 5 3 elloggAve, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property'), B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace e on existing sewer service Subject Property ("Public from the thank sanitary rawer pipe to w lie ter right-of-way line frorri the step box in conjunction with City Improvement) and also consider replacing Project No. ENG 41 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property, NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: q, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of JQ9_6 0he eContracto )sto �trom n view Plumbirto� Inc. X 01 Hi__ view F are Knost construct the Public Improvement, Property Owner Order 024 was contract ssued o he Contractor. The construct the Public improvement and Purcha refen work is completed and the Contractor has submitted receipt of afilian waver for the wtork performed and No.� 0P.4 for the amount of $3,695.00, The City is p will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City wiNwil be ssesserl Project unde tike same terms amount s City 33.695.0 -0 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost to Project No. ENG 115, The Property Owner waives and to City Project No ENGa11 ntive -5, nc�luding but the special assessments and to the Public improvement not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Spit. 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall ntbmay be upon ecorded Property against Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. Th 9 the title to the Subject Property, 952. 927-Pfil City Hall W 952.926 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.Cityof�� ina.com TTY 952. 876 -wq EDINA, MINNESU'I'A, 55424.1394 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS' COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -day of 20„ , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER. J STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OI~ Crow P"'Aq ) s�. Tha foregoing instrument, 201L by DRAFTED BY: CABIiP851 -L KNl.1T80N Pmfessionaf Association 317 Eagandale fate aentes' 1360 Corporate Center Curve F-agan, Mlnne5ote 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn before me�fts alb - day of 2 C 0.A RRON RICHARD STbEN Notary Public Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2014 RECEINE® a 29 2011 r t7F EDINA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 201 by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and QO\ V i A- O+n.aL husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 11, Block 12, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5537 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,450.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So:, Mpls, MN 55406 he "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1031 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1031 for the amount of $4,450.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,450.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai, the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA L." (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -2 :� day of A-c'aLA-,o i— , 201 1, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OFP�,cK The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this 2 74t day of 20 I t , by �o�v;�I�r �.�� ���.,� -�. Spa DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 .ZNK:srn ter 2 JONATHAN DANIEL SHRADER NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA MYCOMI�SSION EXPIRES 01191116 a AGREEMENT made this �`' day of , 20 // y and between the CITY OF A, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 8, Block 10, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5428 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the c�� ` of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,690.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Hiqhview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1021 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 102 AI for the arnount of $5,690.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,690.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Propefi- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded aga the title to the Subject Property. I - City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. mo?en -;. Lid NOTARY PROPERTY OWNER: / r SYLC. dG <s STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 4NOe--) (ss. COUNTY OF he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this C2 day of 2011 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm ARY PUBLIC 2 LYNETTE 81UNNp WTARYPUg -c.Wry TA won Expires Jan.31, 2016 tigZ1.lA.11�1`Ir �1 o� e Cn iaee RECEIVED AM»sn CITY OF ®INA l PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this , day of ; 2(OJL, by and bpyeen the CITY OF EDI a Minne o a municipal corporatiran City ") and MA hu and wife (the "Prope caner ). W. RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 11 , Block 8, South Harriet Park , of having a street address of 5437 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cc'-` of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,890.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1313 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and-the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1313 for the amount of $4,890.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,890.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor AND ,i' , Scott H. Neal, City Manager ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )' The fore oin instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 9 9 9 Y. 20 r l , by James B. Hovland and by.Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manag606fthe City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC LYNEITE BIUNNO PROPERTY OWNER: t NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA M) Commission Expires Jan. 31.2016 % STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of A20 , . by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan,. Minnesota 55121 .elephone: (612) 452 -5000 ,1NK:srn 2 4,9S�1r� 0� e �` U) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of -�- '20_d, by and between the CITY OF DIN a Minn sot municipal corporati ( "City ") and �%i' q[- egy �� �Q husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 18, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5409 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,350.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1694 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 'i6944 for the amount of $4,350.00. The City is in receipt of alien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,350.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF JJQLAKe h( ( ss. Th foregoing instru ent u , 20, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 - elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC N PUBLIC this day of uixrn NPJMAAALUS'Vi ,sue, v '� �y Rg PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND City of Edina SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of S� , 20�, b be a the CITY OF EDT a Minnesota municipal corporate ( "City ") and e e LSO-, 30, �C�Q,, , husband and wife (the "Prope O er'). RECITALS A. Propert�l Owner is the owner of Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5429 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,316.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1314 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1314 for the amount of $4,316.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,316.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed underthe same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this t 5`r day of aLxSr , 20 11 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF file- ,,A ( ss. ) The foregoing instru ent i 2011 by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 �elephone: (612) 452 -5000 :NK:srn PROPERTY OWNER: k1yn11i1. ' .1 2 DAVID BENSON Notary Public Minnesota 0 (emy Commission Expires Janua 31 2013 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I (Q*-day of AX)o sx- , 20 l l , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and en *k<i-k'Ay (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 10 , Block12, South Harriet Park , of having a street address of 5536 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co-, of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,250.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1032 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1032 for the amount of $4,250.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,250.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Propertv Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me -this " day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota rriunicipal.corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to,the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF.MINNESOTA ) 1 (ss. COUNTY OF ) y The foregoing instrument was a nowled! ,.20_LL, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1,380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 ZNK:srn 0 w9lr�ll� U) v � .3y • o ', PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT inn AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 1) , by and between the CITY O EDIJVA, a Minnesota municipal core ation � "City ") and (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4, Block 9, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5412 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,800.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1034 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1034 for the amount of $2,800.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,800.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: (SEAL) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrumentwas.acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by,James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively,the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota. municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss, COUNTY OF I l) J,he foregoing linstrument was by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: cknowl dged before me this I day of .-q e— i rL O ARY PUBLIC LYNETTE 81UNN0 NOTARY PU8UC•MIN*WA my cammksion &OMS Jan, 31, 2016 2 w91NA11� ok e 4� .�y I PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND City o Edina SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20ZL, by and between the CITY OF E A, a Minnesota municipal c rp ation ( "City ") and �,,� (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 14, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5425 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also ,consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1028 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1028 for the amount of $4,550.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,550.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) EM-31 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ' ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF A&Plak�ni ) The foregoing instrument was 14 1 20A_, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELLKNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 .RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: frC��Ti: 2 YY II�� me this `C _ day of t0 w1ja LfNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commimion Expires Jan. 31, 2016 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 3 day of J �'"� , 20 �� , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Cass• •-cam , husband and wife (the "Property O er" ). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4., Block 13, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5512 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,600.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1689 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1689 for the amount of $5,600.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,600.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded again the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ( §s- COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the•Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY O ) The foregoing instrument was -. , 20;11 ,by_ DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate, Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK :srn NOTARY PUBLIC P OPERTY OWNER: A before me thi day of • DOROTNY J. JOW40N NOTARY PUBM.AsufmTA IOU 2 I ore v � �y •f�`bo Two. 4118 Ply� N�DPi ��NA i PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 21st day of July , 2011 by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and teary Kottke (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3, Block 111 of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5508 Kellogg Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1676 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1676 for the amount of $7,050.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,050.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the .benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall i 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) 3TI STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this z b +"v1 day of Qa6L'04 , 20j, by Car -U,.da 5`• �1ksi DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 tNK:srn NOTARY PUBLI i z .t 2 w91NA j- o e.. 0 a'�XEIVED AN 15 2011 CITY OF EDI NA mm� %2e9 u�uu��uwiu u�r i, �� PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota -- Municipal corporation ( "City ") and husbei9d and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 181 Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5509 Brookview, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,655.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1015 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1015 for the amount of $4,655.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,655.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai, the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) ZI Re STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: nn A STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ( ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this - , 204�, by Kt-N WA (M NOT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 .NK:srn 2 � day of `�✓If1f. /f. . . ��JJJ_ /J. /. /.1. /!JJ 'III. /- l!_ / ', � C `o:.' ''; n�. �=/: �'rJ'./r✓1.11llrff./�_/Y.1I11J1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT 1�y vi 1- 4ultla AGREEMENT made this day of �'� , 20AL, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and (the " Vroperty Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 12, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5532 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the' Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cc-' of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,950.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1697 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1697 for the amount of $3,950.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,950.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 -927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofElina.com TTY 952 - 8260379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: ,i F24 , STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ( ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this hv' I j 416fSSr- , 20-IL, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curare Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 ,NK:srn day of 2 DEACON ALES NOTARY PUSUC • MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1/31/19 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 10' day of luGG« , 20 1 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and L.�RC --o✓ L . ei#e(the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 10, Block 10, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5436 Kellogg Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co" of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,000.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North Minneapolis MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1691 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1691 for the amount of $5,750.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor_ 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,750.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 -927 -9861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of —,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ( ss. G ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of � , 20�, by ,drPrl for oG areas 4 NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 tNK:srn ANNETTE B. OZER NOTARY PUSUC•MINNESOTA. of CsmmMM E*res Jm. 31, 2015 ■ 6VV~ O 2 o e t4 .3y `^'�� °. a. � �, O PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 4 U 6 U S 7- , 20:I 1, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and 0 01vA-t.D /�-M jo A4 6Y2 -7-_2___ , husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 17, Block 12, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5513 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co-' of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,680.00 (the "Project Cost") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave So Mpls MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1027 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1027 for the amount of $3,680.00. The City is in receipt of a lie^ `dJaiver for tlhe vforl: performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,680.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Propertv Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded again the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 =826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA 7.139 (SEAL) James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF �� L ) The foregoing instrument V- , 20_�/, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 NK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: acknowledged _before ARY PUBLIC this 4 day of `lJ_�I. 1, /l /lllll_/_/ll,/lJllll./JIJ�( 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _ day of v✓f , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and , hweb"d and -wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 13, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5429 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "), B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement') and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City asse ° - the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,775.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So Mpls MN 55406 he "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1025 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1025 for the amount of $6,775.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,775.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor .(SEAL) AND. Scott H. Neal, City Manager IDN STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing .instrument was acknowledged before me.this f day of 20-Y-1 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City ana er of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 4MARY PUBLIC ETTE BIUNNO NY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. PROPERTY OWNER: L9 A- COUNTY.'OF ) the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 NK:srn 2 w91'AA ok e V1 0 tom' �nIBBB / �c ,9 tD Cl/-Y ap! p OF£ , fFRilUn_ „�hA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of kS , 20_6_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and k , husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 11, Block .9. of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5437 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City asse- the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,790.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place Minnetonka MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1022 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1022 for the amount of $5,790.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,790.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property/ Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET � FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: J , STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF ,� ) The foregoing instrument was a nowledged a ore me this / 7 day of a,tj , 20 6! , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON COLM KOM Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center M►4 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 .NK:srn PA 4,91A,r� ok e PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT iECEINED min 29 2011 AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , b and b en khe C OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation City ") and� husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1, Block 11, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5500 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co -4 of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,795.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Hiqhview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1029 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1029 for the amount of $5,740.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,740.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager "Fl? .r Co The regoing instr ment was acknowledged before me this I day of joby James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Nlana r of he City Edma, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. `... LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY Puux- MINNESOTA My Commksion Expires Jan. 31, 2016 PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MIN CCk MINNESOTA ) S7 `S ��� �� COUNTY OF (ss. aL:f�q�� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 �glephone: (612) 452 -5000 NK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 w9S�,r� J w • l��bRPOMS� • � \ oe 9 o 2 !TY OF 'aaa �- 11tEER1NGl PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of[��_, , 20-11, by and be Veen the CITY OF DINA, a Minnesota municipal corporat —ion ( "City ") anda(�`i"� husband and wife (the "Prope Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2, Block 12, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5504 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cr of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property, NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,076.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc. P.O. Box 247 Loretto MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1671 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1671 for the amount of $4,076.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,076.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Properr•- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair. the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) ► R STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager NG /NF�JNG The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of S+ , 20_y_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manag r of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC LYNETTE BIUNNO PROPE OWNER: NOTARY pUBUC•MIt6`IWA My 6pmmi.Zion 6cpkea Jan. 31, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 ,by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association ' 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve ' Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 0) v .by • �nCOflPOW �E9 ieae so A°� (P3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of � , 201 , b and between the CITY OF PINA, a Minnesota municipal corpor tion ( "City ") and E r , husband and wife (the "Pr erty Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Part of Lot 11 Block 2, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5500 Woodcrest Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,940.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ellingson Companies, 56113 State Hwy. 55, West Concord, MN 5985 -6066 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1023 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1023 for the amount of $4,940.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,940.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded again the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofE3ina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA F--W (SEAL) umb STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this JD :rj—i day of Tut jr _,2011 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. WW H ;1. WOOLSEY o" blWMlnnesota Evim Jan 31.2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF JA OQEPt J ) PROPERTY OWNER: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /D*� day of ,J (A N E , 20_Lt__, by LE P.t k zr • Vii oo LS e V NOTA Y PUBLI DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELLKNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn MUM LEAH J. WOOLSEY NoWyy PubHo- Minnesota My Comm = SOW Jan 31. 2M5 2 NbR�p �9 (40/' , PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT C f VA; AND U IIla SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of i2ece-4 J , 201, b nd betweggn the CITY OF ED A, a inngsota municipal corporation ( "City ") and s Ili PQ rIL L I\ (S,O 4— , husband and wife (the Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot ,Block , of having a street address of 5600 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,650.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1325 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1325 for the amount of $4,650.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,650.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agains* the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 / EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -037 CITY OF EDINA L (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was V- , 20_., by _b_X; DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: /�) f/ � ) z V this i) day of Q (YIdVI r� ��k Qna JulI e ho pwt LISA N SNp PPARD Notary Minnesota Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2012 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this /Otk day of - a44G' , 20 /2., by and beeen the CITY OF EDINA, a Min es to municipal corporate ( "City ") and �yi'Uf7asLQ �7��/c , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2., ,Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5404 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,695.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1688 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1688 for the amount of $3,845.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,845.00 against the Subject Property. The 'Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai, the title to the Subject Property. City Hall - 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 f (SEAL) CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, -City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY 'OFHENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 10 day,of lof uj # rM 1 ,20Jd-, by Jaynes B. Hovland and by Scott H. (Veal, respectively. the Mayor and City Manager of he ,Cityof Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. LYNETTE BIUNW N ARY PUBLIC NOTW PU&X- sore MNCrAr`3''io'e PROPE1( OWNER:,4/ / A ? STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF NL PJ ) The foregoing. instrument' was irlUGt/1'L1 , 2012, by i DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn i TH I I' i/ � i _/ • ,• rim 1 ti N AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I �fi% day of AL t4 Ks -r , 20A, by and between the CITY OF,EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and 6 tai a.c a AeA e 1 ?a r--i -o , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 161 Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5517 Brookview, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,760.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services, 5790 Quam Ave NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 `the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1005 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1005 for the amount of $4,760.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,760.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA AN (SEAL) _►e STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF A-bkA ( ss. ) . The foregoing instrument was J 2 , 20 !2, by — DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: 1 me this 'P' day of S1dkl �. �� 2ze �;. ' 2 0 0 JULIE A. JOHNSON NOTARY PUBUC•MINNESOTA My Commission DOM Jsn. 31.2015 ■ 'W41N�' \rte Cn MC28 ,.. CITY OF EGA: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City OC Edina AND � SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 20 I , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota m rcrpaI corporation ( "City ") and %1W /jMl1 JL9. m qluppb , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 1, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5429 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s). from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the' stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. f C. Property Owner has. replaced. their sewer and .has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement :against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,475.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1681 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1681 for the amount of $4,775.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,775.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public,Im.provement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to, hearing requiremgnts, and. any claim. that the assessment exceeds the .benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 -927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA', MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -626 -0379 `// CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23 day of , 20 1 (, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a3 day of 20L�_, by Mo vyL A,. (3,r�a: ^'� ^`"� ancL nn�-� 4Ey►.^ T3rcy'�e�• DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 W:srn NOTARY PUBLI WW 19 MEIONDRA L JEFFERSON NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131115 it nRronw PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 It by and between the CITY OF EQINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and e I/V!i ty 4 C -Joydoy) husband.and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 01 , Block 12. South Harriet Park, of having a street address of 5500 Oaklawn, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the co-'- of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. VOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,675.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1319 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1319 for the ie amount of $3,675.00. The City is in receipt of alien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,675.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agaii the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 -927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofrJina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 a CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager 6 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of L44V , 20 II , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. LT1VrI IEtxufww (AA PUBLIC NOTARYPUBUC•MMI M M 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) PROPERTY OWNER: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 .NK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this A-I'*' day of OkenAP41 , 20 L , by and b tween the CITY OF ED114A, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and i-L I M G 6A SO , husband and wife (the "Property Ow er'). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 8, Block 2, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5501 Dever, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement "). and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,300.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Groth Sewer & Water, 775 Tower Drive Hamel MN 5340 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1038 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice.to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1038 for the amount of $7,300.00. T lie City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the ;work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,300.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural. and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The. Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. . 3.: BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This_ Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner -and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 V CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY_OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day;of by Jame&'B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of ,.the e City of Edina, a Minnesota rnunicipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant "to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF 'MINNESOTA (ss. COUNTY:0171ehh ) The foregbing;instrument was acknowledged before me this day of D 20—�X , by CRomy. 'F, y,,ehsrnn , Shaer a �n NOTARY PUBLIC., DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve ,�°" "r pAME LA J• STENZEL Eagan, Minnesota 55121 NctarY Public A41 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 ;;y ������ ®fl €dies Jan s1, 1015 RNK:srn N e U) 0 • ,^�APOM�ED . ieao ?ECEIVED\ DEC 16 2011 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CITY OF EDINA, y of Edina AND ENGINEERI S L SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this /5' day of 4 , 20IJ, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesot municipal cor oration ( "City ") and �'14ok P_ A= , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Part of Unplatted 19 028 24, having a street address of 5501 Park PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of t' Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,000.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water Inc., P.O. Box 247 Loretto MN 55357 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1692 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1692 for the amount of $6,400.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,400.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Proper- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair, the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofE3ina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 P__11 CITY OF EDINA Am (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF I VIf1 i w91r�1f� o et t v, � �y • I�COp ��0 ..tl • B PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this A r day of anVer the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and ci� (,, Jr ►�1� % (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 18, Block 12, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5509 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $9,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1316 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1316 for the amount of $9,100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 9 100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) Wl STATE OF MINNESOTA Scott H. Neal, City Manager i ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_0—, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H.. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City "of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and . pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. :K+ '�j8 °`' TERRI JO VVILSOfV 'c Noiary Public Minnesota . ;�ii'i� + MY Commission Expires Jan 31, ^c013 NOTARY P PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing, instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_1,?-, by �twi UJ►I' NOTARY NBLIC DRAFTED BY: ``- TERM JO WILSON. �,�,vz�;: CAMPBELL KNUTSON i tt� Notary P ubic-Minnesota Professional Association =_ A9y Commission Expires Jan 31,2013 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 - elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn \j o G F. t4 U) �y n• FES ,- .16 Clly ZQ�? PIYBvct�!NA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 2.0% day of u , 20 /Z., by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and JjMmej 14. ,NJ -i�Wot( At Sept I , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3, Block 2, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5508 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of. 3 900.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ellingson Companies, 56113 State Hwy. 55, West Concord, MN 55985 -6066 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1670 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1670 for the amount of $3,900.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,900.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 FAX 952-826-0390 9 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) ► N STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �r.�` (ss. COUNTY OF r- NV t� ) The foregoing inst ment 207,2-� by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: i ire me t day of r-\ ahA 6 �n NOTARY AA IWAMY MICHELE JENSEN otary PubUo-Minnesota CommlWon F�tree Jan 31. 2015 2 w9�N� \rte ok e U) �0 �3 PUBLIC I AND VEMENT City Of Ed1116 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this t . day of ��� �� , AZ , by and between the CITY OF EDI A, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Ci ") and - T�S 1 7 �Q 1, C Fr-Iv , husband and wife (the 71roperty Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2, Block 13, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5504 Brookview Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,829.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ellingson Companies, 56113 State FIM. 55, West Concord, MN 5985 -6066 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1010 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1010 for the amount of $5,829.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,829.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5, The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agains; the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA L'-'1 (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument 20_L_)-.by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curare Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: m �owledgeed before mq this t &A' day of c '1: SHARON M. AUJSON WrARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA MYCOMMI a INO N- 31, 2015 2 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ki day of J&v4ful , 20 13' by nd between he CITY O DINA, a Mi nesota municipal corporation (" ity ") and on Q 46 iiit Oaol (cl�tfZ. , husband and wife (the "Property wner"). RECITALS :Rs Property Owner is the owner of Lot 6, Block 11, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5520 Kelloqq Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way, line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cr of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,695.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1686 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1686 for the amount of $3,695.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,695.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Properb, Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai. the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952 - 8260379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 0-, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. IN STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) N ARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office. Center 1380 Corporate Center Curare Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of �qZ A �1 o� e NCO �y • �roAPON+�E� 1980 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this < z4 day of �A '� , 20) �; by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Sarah and David Parry, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 6, Block 10, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5420 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,000.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ellingson Drainage, P.O. Box 68, West Concord, MN 55985 the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1331 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1331 for the amount of $5,000.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The -City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,000.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City'Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 ; by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the.Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council STATE OF MINNESOTA ,) - (ss. COUNTY OF The,foregoing instrument was 20 lZ, by DRAFTED BY: - CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Sarah Pa ick,nowledged before me this day of OTARY PUBLIC �. r BRENDA LOUISE SCHUSTER NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31.2013 r 2 o� e • ,^Cb�roM ��9 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 3 ° day of M6 A- "- � , 20 l25 by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and V 4"- C, rA,e ,1,.✓ e- TR i G y./ , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5, Block 7, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5416 Park PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,196.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1663 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1663 for the amount of $3,196.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,196.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the .assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) I �,., � • � ss. COUNTY O rte^ Thp foregoing instrument `Y I ckrU -N , 201_;�t, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 -elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC ERTY OWNER: (77 l this day of ef11a+ 2 IA •1 ryN1jy, o� e t4 a2� �y nronnTE� oen r EQ; I JUL 12011 ecn- or- ED11VA M PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this /6 04/ day of 7441e-, , 20//, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, an Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Gl415s $` S� husband and wife (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 13, Block 14, of South, Harriet Park having a street address of 5529 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No, ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,450.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1672 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1672 for the amount of $3,450.00. The City is in receipt of a !ien waiver for the work performed and will Nay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,450.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn: Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (St. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Q__1 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively. the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OFy�f The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5 day of 20 jam, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON 4BAREBARA Professional Association A. EDESKUTY 317 Eagandale Office Center Notary Publk-Winnewta 1380 Corporate Center Curve y oommW lw �W si, 2°'s _Eagan, Minnesota 55121 -elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 'r a� PUBLIC IM AND PROVEMENT City of Edina SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of ',-:S —v �— V , 20�, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3, Block 8, of Colonial Grove Third Addition having a street address of 5533 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,196.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1696 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1696 for the amount of $3,196.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,196.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was 2011 , by_ DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curare Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: before me this V day of NOTARY PUBLIC 2 LYNE RE BIUNNO NOTARY P(/gW.MINAESOTA A1Y commisspn Expires Jan. 31, 2016 AGREEMENT made this o? / day of Nom_ , 20 //, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minne to municipal corporation ( "City ") and � � C Y 2 —y r- , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 21 Block 1, of Colonial Grove Fifth Add'n having a street address of 5517 Woodcrest Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer & water and has requested that the City assess t1- cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1673 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1673 for the amount of $8,550.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,550.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Propert- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agaii the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) _►e STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ---------------- --------------------- --------------- LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF 4fiLeV ( ss. ' ) The foregoing instrument J u.ny, , 20 l l , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELLKNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn a� before me this NOTARY PUBLIC 2 a ) ` day of o e Cn U PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20V, by and between the CITY OF EDINA a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and la dc c)4 husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Properly Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5432 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,996.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1684 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1684 for the amount of $3,996.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,996.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was a JLL4�-A- - , 20 // , by 7 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 .elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn - ged before me this a day of inn .,. TERRI.JO WILSON ` Notary Publio-Minnesota p W CommiVkn S#res d8n 31, 2013 2 w91N�11'r�,, o� e �y • /n roRPOB SF9 O a PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City f Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of Lae , 20 _&, by nd between the CITY OF DIN , a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and V[ /,� � f ti , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 10, Block 14. of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5536 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,600.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services 5790 Quam Ave NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1026 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1026 for the amount of $2,600.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,600.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded againf the title to the Subject Property. City Hall I 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) B The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of - - - - - - - - by,James-B. Hovland ' an d by Scott H.- Neal, respectively the May& and -City - Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY oFJ�ji^e P ) The foregoing ,instrument was'acknowledged before me this / day of ''tGr ✓ , 20__LL,,bY ARY P B IC - DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON JIM KOZICKY . Professional Association Notary Public Minnesota 317 Eagandale Office Center Commission Ex fires Janua 31, 2015 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 0) X11 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edii10 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this Ito day of Mlh'< , 20_�_L, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and k, 7SVwkt, husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 81 Block 2, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5440 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of V Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,795.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing, Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1675 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order 'No. 1675 for the amount of $2,795.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,795.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Prope,` Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agai the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA Fin (SEAL) ump STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this i (S? day of JIAK)e , 20A_, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 .elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn Z� NOTARY PUBLIC } 0) 4,91NA �1 U) v�p 0 ^^ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT i AGREEMENT made this S day of J (A Ae./„ , 20 by d b t eert the CITY OF EDINA, Minnes to municipal corporation ("City") and � rg , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 121 Block 7, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5433 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer & water and has requested that the City assess th^ cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,465.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1664 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1664 for the amount of $7,465.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,465.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agaii the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ). (, ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Thejoregping instrument was acknowledged before me this day.- of________ -__ -. 20 - - - - -- - - - - - -- — 2 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal,, respectively the Mayor and City Manager. ofthe City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. kvil-ew Ave- S q-z STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. S COUNTY.OF )' The, foregoing instrument w -,2011 � by_ DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121. 'elephone: (612).452-5000. .iNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: 'nowled ed before me this o :( day of NOTARY PUBLIC 2 LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jam 31.2016 wvl ^j�. sz 'A • $9. C.. i}F Co. �.- gS .o PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 20,x, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and bl, M. SV6 C1- C� (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 171 Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5513 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. . C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of V Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,625.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1690 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1690 for the amount of $4,625.00. The.City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,625.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Prope,4- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded aga, the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1i FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEJina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA 1-33 (SEAL) Map STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this oho rte day of 20A, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Maij6her of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pu ant to the authority granted by its City Council. /, A A I I . n STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTYOF�Mivl ss. The foregoing instrument was 20__U, by Iq DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve ciagan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn PROPERTY OWNER: NOTARY 2 EVA me this 20 day of I LRIAOI V ANGEL M. JOHNSON NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My Cmwde" EWM J■L 31, 2015 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM ■ W w ANGEL M.JOHNSON NOTARY PUBLIC•MINNESOTA W co -dww Eom JUL 31, 2015 ■ Z� PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this —Z-7AIA day of J L( &) C , 20 l k, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municip I corporation ( "City ") and 2?6 END, R �I�% St EVE , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 161 Block 7, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5417 Brookview Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of th- Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,250.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1678 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1678 for the amount of $5,250.00. The City is in receipt of alien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,250.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Propertv Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: o STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �rr .. (ss. COUNTY OF /4e® , ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged bef!?re me this day of s�c.r Ll-z , 20 /(, by L, o r 3-3 d jK6-.w .e c-r, y'r S 1 rc , �' / DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve pagan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn srfsrs.�l�rrrr rs.�.���1�rfrlr �Zr1A, ll?r Ok e In • r��bxronr4�9 �eee PUBLIC IMAPP ROVEMENT City Of Edina SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of J(,t. U , 201, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and �i i q�sbaed -and -wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3, Block 1, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5417 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,195.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1693 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1693 for the amount of $5,195.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,195.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF , i ✓� ) The foregoing instrument was ,5 Lr\j;L , 20j I_, by —1. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: L(�cq I �iT C Ixec"n (4 r"r' i.. before me this ZOt(I-day of DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON AMON& Professional Association SEAN PATRICK CORCORAN Notary Public-State of Mbinesota 317 Eagandale Office Center My Commission Expires 1380 Corporate Center Curve January 31, 2012 7agan, Minnesota 55121 alephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 w9iN�1r� • fN�APes A��O a PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND City o �C�I11� SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 27 day of TV (r , 20 t l , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and F,-- U 67 F q i= PE C E (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 11,. Block 7, of Sbuth Harriet Park having a street address of 5437 Brookview, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,250.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1016 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1016 for the amount of $5,250.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed-and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,250.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA (Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing. instrument was- .acknowledged- before -me- this -- day -of -- :20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE.OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this _ day of �cn , 20. 1(, by et Cc IF ci.. av NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association MARILYN R. MUSOLF 317 Eagandale Office Center NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA 1380 Corporate Center Curve y WPowiWon Expires Jan. 31,201:5 Fagan, Minnesota 55121 )lephone: (612) 452 -5000 <NK:srn 2 w91N� \lam o�e..V6 Cn �y •' ^'�uaronwKE° r� JU1. � 2p11 S1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT Clt of Edina AND Y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this o3o day of , 20 //, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corp ation ( "City ") and (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 12, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5433 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,950.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1030 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1030 for the amount of $2,950.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,950.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA ul (SEAL) Mil STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF- ih ) IF I he foregoing instrument was It j wxc , 20 (, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 'elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: owledged before me this �D�"day of Wt; -P:6 u &C3 NOTARY PUBLIC 2 LYNETTE 81UNNO NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My C°mmission Expires Jan. 31, 2016 o e Cn v /4::�q o PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day, of IJ V t , 20 t 7 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and C` y t�1► —� r= t- , 1��1'�� , husb in he "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 8., Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5428 Brookview, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1701 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1701 for the amount of $3,100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Properfi- Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded agair the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The fore_going_instrument was acknowledged_before.me -this _ -_. -_ _ .day -of -- - - 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively.the Mayor: and City Manager of the' City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF _ j T he foregoing instrument was 201 (, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380. Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota: 55121 -elephone: (612) 452 -5000 rRNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC - PROPERTY OWNER: nowledged before me this day - of v NOT RY PUBLIC • "" LYNETTE BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Cammission Expires Jan. 31, 2016 4 0 e • Po.FAT�� A PUBLIC IMAPP ROVEMENT City of Edina SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 2- 2 day of J Q4 <-- , 20 11 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, A a Mffesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and r ovlV �, ,V— I h, wh a md -acid #e -(the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5416 Brookview Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement') and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,995.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1036 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1036 for the amount of $3,196.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay . the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in' the amount of $3,196.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was c-U 11-e— , 201( , by C DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 - elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Co i4y-a-d Ce r�r bg pre me this o'1 a day of ? + -E W- ARY RUBLIC 2 4�9SN�,j�l. o e V .by • `ArOpobe AZQ'9 1 ��1. 7 2�4} � PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND City of Edina SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ®-� day of , 20 I I , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and R-0 96y-T" A. �-, Ltelk 6 . PEeC_ , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7, Block 13, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5524 Brookview, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $5,600.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1018 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1018 for the amount of $5,600.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,600.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) :►- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of J , 20jj_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manag4 of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF kevin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this J , 20_LL, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 6LA�-a 02�' �:r NOTARY PMBLIC TERRI JO WILSON Notary Public Minnesota a �f}#: MY Commission Expires Jan 31, 2013 2 day of rUoL %.o unrrwvV-1r1V-111 City t' Edina AND y SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 1JU 201 L, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota unici,al corporation ( "City ") and Y71Q �CGC�� , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 15, Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5421 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,975.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1312 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1312 for the amount of $2,975.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,975.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 1 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 (SEAL) CITY OF EDINA : James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN . ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day.of. 20 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of-the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss. COUNTY OF ` ) \\ The-fore going instrument was acknowledged by ',� 1�(,�i ; DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office. Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn ARY P 2 h bD Dre me�this LP, day of A 6 Q mom RITA LOUISE AROLA Notary. Public JNinnesota My Corttm. Expires Jan 31. 2015 Aareements Unsigned by Ow. ners r-1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of .20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and John Crabtree, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3. Block 9. South Harriet Park having a street address of 5408 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,906.20 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services, 5790 Quam Ave NE St. Michael MN 55376 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1321 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1321 for the amount of $3,906.20. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,906.20 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor AND ' Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by.its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: John Crabtree STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of M PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and John Steuhenson, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 13, South Harriet Park having a street address of 5532 Brookview Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,500.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Beniamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1317 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1317 for the amount of $3,500.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: John Stephenson STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20____, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of 11-1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Patricia & Douglas Vavda, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1. Block 1. Edwards Addn having a street address of 5601 Oaklawn, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,475.00 (the "Project Cost") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. 3233 45th Ave. So Mpls MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1318 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1318 for the amount of $4,475.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,475.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 -826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Patricia Vayda Douglas Vayda STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Christopher & Nancy Carlile, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 2. Block 11. Shady Pines Addn having a street address of 5504 Kellogg Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1315 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1315 for the amount of $8, 100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 8 100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING1DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. -Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager -of "the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporations on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Christopher Cadile Nancy Carlile STATE OF 'MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY'OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ;20 ,by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL`KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curare Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK :srn 2 ;ko PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Scott and Julie Card, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 01 B. Block 2, Shady Pines Addn having a street address of 5517 Dever Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,500.00 (the "Project Cost") from Metro General Services, 5790 Quam Ave NE, St. Michael MN 55376 he "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1011 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1011 for the amount of $2,500. 00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: (SEAL) _�D STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 —' by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Scott Card Julie Card STATE OF MINNESOTA. ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNKsm NOTARY PUBLIC 'r_a day of Al PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Patrick Flananan, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 18, Block 9. South Harriet Park having a street address of 5409 Kellogg Ave., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1668 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1668 for the amount of $6,800.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,800.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINGIDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: (SEAL) F\D STATE OF MINNESOTA -) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Patrick Flanagan STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 201 by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC 0) A 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Tracy Holtan, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5. Block 10, South Harriet Park having a street address of 5416 Kellow, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $7,550.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1324 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1324 for the amount of $6,800.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,800.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERINdDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Tracy Holtan STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 ,by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota, 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC 2 R3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Joshua Roberts, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 4. Block 2. Shady Pines Addn having a street address of 5512 Woodcrest, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,610.00 (the "Project Cost") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1019 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1019 for the amount of $4,610.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4.610. 00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEF.RINCJDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 -826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James.B. Hovland, M_ ayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF. HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me1his day of 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H., Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and. pursuant`to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Joshua Roberts STATE .OF MINNESOTA ) { ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ,'by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional. Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 13,60 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 -q 4 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Lou Gilbert, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5, Block 9, South Harriet Park having a street address of 5416 Oaklawn, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,950.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 451h Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1033 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1033 for the amount of $2,950.0 0. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,950.0 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN . ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Lou Gilbert STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of N PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Wilfrido & Sarah Castaneda, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 7. Block 2. Shady Pines Addn having a street address of 5505 Dever Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $1,850.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin, 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1320 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1320 for the amount of $1,850.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $1,850.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss,. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by James �B. Hovland and.by Scott -H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal. corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City" Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Wilfrido Castaneda Sarah Castaneda STATE'OF MINNESOTA ) (ss.. . COUNTY OF, ) The foregoing instrument was 'acknowledged before me this day: of , 20 ) , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center,Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 9115 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Shadow Properties, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 8, Block 12, South Harriet Park having a street address of 5528 Oaklawn, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,250.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave So Mpls MN 55406 (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1014 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1014 for the amount of $3,250.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,250.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.F,dinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 CITY OF EbINA M. (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 209 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Shadow Properties STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20_, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELLKNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNKsm NOTARY PUBLIC day of -A SEH October 11, 2012 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 -3037 Dear Wayne: RE: City of Edina Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements — 5501 Oaklawn Avenue SEH No. 113734 14.00 Thank you for sharing with us the email attached to this letter as Exhibit 1 from Richard and Mary Jean Weigel at 5501 Oaklawn Avenue. In their email, they. pose several questions. For your convenience, we will answer their questions one at a time below. 1. Is there a design flaw in the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvement (project) that is causing their basement to flood? No. The scope of the City's project work was sensitive not to alter the existing geology of the subgrade soils beneath the streets where ground water resides. Street reconstruction did not import materials that would affect groundwater patterns outside of the roadbed. Utility reliabilitation included use of several trenchless methods to upgrade both the hunk main pipe for the sanitary sewer and water main. Concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer catch basins and pipe were installed on the west and north sides of 5501 Oaklawn Avenue to convey surface storm water away from the property. Prior to the project, storm water would collect at the edge of the Street and slowly percolate into the ground. 2. What could be done in the future to alert homeowners of this potential problem? Based on our experience, the City already adequately alerts and asks property owner's in its street reconstruction projects about ground water during its 2 open houses and I information meeting. Furthermore, property owners are asked in a questionnaire at the start of the design process whether or not they own drain tile, footing drain, sump puinp, or if they would consider connecting their roof drains to a sump drain pipe. We recommend the City continues its practices of asking and alerting. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive; Suite 300. Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sei)inc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax Mr. Wayne Houle, PE October 11, 2012 Page 2 3. Should the City pay for the unnecessary expense incurred by the Weigel's? No. The City recognized the presence of groundwater in the neighborhood as shown in the map labeled Exhibit 2 attached to this letter. As shown, several properties within the neighborhood appear to deal with ground water problems as evidenced by ownership of a sump pump labeled by a red `S'. Storm Water ponding and surface drainage problem areas. are indicated by blue ovals or thick lines respectively. This map was created based on questionnaire responses received from property owners in the neighborhood arid, presented to residents at the informational meeting, the public hearing and was posted on the City's website. In our opinion, the City recognized the presence of groundwater.apd sump pumps operafing in the neighborhood: Part of the City's project costs included installation of a sump drain. pipe (pipe) and sump pump stub (stub) where the City believes ground water may be a problem. This pipe and stub is availableto the Weigel's if they want to use it to dispose of water from their recently installed drain tile. Please contact me at 952.912.2616 or.tmuse0_seliinc.com with questions or comments. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRI.CKSON INC. I NIP- Tob Muse, PE Proj . It Manager Attachment c; Chad Millner, City of Edina Paul Pasko, SEH _ plae,etdinAl II734%1gen1114- corA20121011 Itr response!o 55010aWaH-a.dou ,A 1 - : Minnehaha Woods street & sewer project - Request for reimbursement of damages Mary Jean Weigel to: mail, WHoule, tmuse 10/06/2012 08:58 AM Hide Details From: "Mary Jean Weigel' <mjwl 19 @gmail.com> To: <mail@EdinaMN.gov >; < WHoule@ EdinaMN .gov >,' <tmuse @sehinc.com >, History: This message has been forwarded. October 5, 2012 Dear Major, City Council, Wayne Houle and Toby Muse, After attending the October 2 Special Assessment Hearing for the street project known as Minnehaha Woods I am filing an objection, We have lived for 30 years in in our house on the SE corner of 55 t 1. and Oaklawn Avenue. During those years we have had occasional water seepage in the SE_ corner of our basement the unfinished side:) which was easily contained. This included the 1987,18 inch rain and 1991 flooding. Last year the new street and sewer project was completed in our neighborhood. To our surprise when the first heavy rain of spring came on May 3 /4th of this year our basement flooded. The seepage came from the west and north sides. These are the sides that parallel the new.street construction. We pulled up the not very old carpet and waited. The next rain a few weeks later also seeped in immediately. I called Carter (project engineer). He explained that ground water had been diverted due to new storm sewer placement and private sewer lines replacement meant water that used to stay In the system were now just in the ground water. The diverted water is now flowing into my basement. Many of our neighbors have drain tile systems but we did not. We use our finished basement space and felt we could not ignore the new water problem so we were forced to install drain the ($6,600) replace the carpet ($2800) and some wall board and paint was needed ($700). We do have sewer backup insurance but the seepage cannot be covered by our homeowners' insurance policy. .So we were hit with a $10,000 surprise expense for a space that for the last 30 years. had been dry before the new streets and sewers were installed. Was this.a design flaw? What could be done in the future to alert home owners of this potential problem? Should the City pay for this unnecessary expense that I Incurred? (not to mention the 3 months It took to put things back together) My across the street ne.ighbor's and my father's sprinkler systems were repaired by the City. A Brookview homeowner had her retaining wall rebuilt 3 times to meet her satisfaction. (to name only a few of the project's damages fixed by the City already). With 30 years without our basement flooding, it is clear that our damage was also directly caused by the project and we should be reimbursed accordingly. We hereby make it request. Sincerely, Richard and Mary Jean Weigel 5501 Oaklawn Avenue 952- 920 -2151 file://C:\Documents and Settings \tmuse \Local Settings \Temp\notesB5354C \— webl3111tm 10/10/2012 "; 'k ; i ! " .,,- q--o 1 • M To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: October 16, 2012 A, o e ..X • I���nRPOR�`SFO• 1BH8 Agenda Item #: VIII. B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution Nos. 2012 -138, 2012 -139 & 2012 -140 Awarding Sale Of G.O. Bonds Series 2012A, 2012B & 2012C Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2012 -138 Awarding the Sale of $11,935,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A, Resolution 2012 -139 Awarding the Sale of $820,000 Taxable General Obligation Bonds Series 2012B and Resolution 2012 -140 Awarding the Sale of $2,115,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C. Information / Background: Attached are the resolutions awarding the sale of bonds as drafted by the City's bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney. The $11,935,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A has five purposes. The first three purposes are funding of approximately $6,825,000 to net $6,738,000 for various.water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer projects. The fourth purpose is funding of approximately $2,870,000 in principal to net $2,757,700 to the permanent improvement revolving(PIR) fund for the 2012 street reconstruction projects. The fifth purpose is to issue approximately $2,240,000 refunding bonds to refund $3,710,000 of the Series 2007C GO PIR Bonds using $1,500,000 of accumulated prepaid assessments and net of $30,000 issuance costs. The $820,000 Taxable G.O. Bonds, Series 2012B is to finance the portion of the Braemar Arena improvements project that is the leased training facility and can only be financed with a taxable bond issue. The Drive for the Hive donation received went to finance the leased retail portion of the project and a portion of the leased training facility. The payment schedule is set up to pay off the taxable portion of the financing first then begin paying the principal portion of the tax exempt issue. The $2,115,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C is to finance the tax exempt portion of the Braemar Arena improvements project specifically the locker rooms, renovation of the Zamboni room, ADA upgrades and the upper level railings. The bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, October 16. The bids and Ehlers & Associates analysis will be presented to the City Council at the October, 16 Council meeting. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2012 -138 Resolution 2012 -139 Resolution 2012 -140 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50" St • Edina, MN 55424 1 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $11,935,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012A Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 16, 2012 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through 23 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-138 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $11,935,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in.the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of.the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said`corporation, and. -correct and'complete copies ,of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said-meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly, held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer, this day of October, 2012. . Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that (_) proposals had been received prior to 10:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $11,935,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2012-138 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $11,935,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2005 -70, adopted on August 16, 2005, the City created a revolving fund as contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 7a, designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund, and established certain accounts within such Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. The City owns and operates a municipal storm sewer utility (the "Storm Water Utility ") and a municipal sanitary sewer and water utility (the "Sewer and Water Utility," which together with the Storm Water Utility is called the "Utilities "). This Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $11,935,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A (the "Bonds ") for the purpose of (i) financing from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the cost of the construction of various local street improvement projects designated as the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway, Countryside, Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction (Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue), Viking Hills Neighborhood and Valley Estates Neighborhood (together, the "Improvements "); (ii) financing various improvements to the Utilities, including water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvement projects associated with street reconstruction projects (together, the "Utilities Improvements "); and (iii) to currently refund the City's General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2007, dated May 24, 2007 maturing in the years 2014 through 2019 in the aggregate principal amount of $3,720,000 (the "Refunded Bonds "). The Refunded Bonds will be redeemed on February 1, 2013 (the "Redemption Date "). This Council hereby determines to issue and sell the Bonds to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the Improvements, the Utilities Improvements and to refund the Refunded Bonds, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65. The portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements are referred to as the "Improvement Bonds" and are issued pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 475, the portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Utilities Improvements are designated as the "Utilities Bonds" and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and Chapter 475, and the portion of the Bonds issued to refund the Refunded Bonds are referred to as the "Refunding Bonds" and are issued pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 475 The allocation of the Bonds for this purpose is set forth in Section 2.01 hereof. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (—) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of , of , and associates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, to issue and sell the Utilities Bonds to pay the costs of the Utilities Improvements, and to pledge to the payment of the. Utilities Bonds net revenues to be derived from charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities. The City presently has certain outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. Such obligations permit further pledges and appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities to be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation of net revenues of the Utilities to pay such obligations. The City Council hereby determines that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Utilities Bonds and such outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Utilities Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Utilities Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Utilities Bonds forthwith. 1.05. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Improvement Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the assessments to be levied for the cost of the Improvements. Section 2. Bond Terms, Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A, shall be originally dated as of November 15, 2012, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall -2- bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, from November 15, 2012 until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2014 $1,030,000 2022 $915,000 2015'. 1,225,000 2023 930,000 2016 1,230,000 2024 195,000 2017 1,255,000 2025 200,000 2018 1,230,000 2026 205,000 2019 1,100,000 2027 215,000 2020 870,000 2028 220,000 2021 890,000 2029 225,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Improvement Bonds: Year Amount 2015 $170,000 2016 170,000 2017 175,000 2018 175,000 2019 175,000 2020 180,000 2021 185,000 2022 190,000 2023 190,000 2024 195,000 2025 200,000 2026 205,000 2027 215,000 2028 220,000 2029 225,000 -3- The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Utilities Bonds: Year Amount 2014 $630,000 2015 655,000 2016 660,000 2017 665,000 2018 670,000 2019 685,000 2020 690,000 2021 705,000 2022 725,000 2023 740,000 The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Refunding Bonds: Year Amount 2014 $400,000 2015 400,000 2016 400,000 2017 415,000 2018 385,000 2019 240,000 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2013, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Re ister. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form -4- satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of:the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal.. amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for. exchange the.Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge . upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be :paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated Lost; Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar, shall deliver anew Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the -5- Registrar of an appropriate bond 'or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. 0) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Pang Agent The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2014 through 2021 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2022 through 2029 shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2021 and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount] Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call. for redemption thereof to'be published as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the, call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected.by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds'are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction, of the City Finance Director, and. shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City. Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a' facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he.or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any, security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon -7- payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the following form: MM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2012A Interest Maturity Rate Date % February 1, 20_ REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: Date of Original Issue CUSIP November 15, 2012 THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February I and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2013 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 - day year composed of twelve 30-day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. -8- This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $11,935,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to serial number, maturity date, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 16, 2012 (the "Resolution "), to maintain the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund of the City, a permanent fund established for the financing and refinancing of local improvements for which special assessments may be levied against property specifically benefited thereby, and to finance the costs of improvements to the storm sewer utility and to the sanitary sewer and water utility of the City, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Section 444.075 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2021 and earlier years are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 2022 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2021 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium.] At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of the Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in -9- exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at. the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the improvements financed and refinanced by the Bonds collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on such portion of the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become due, and has appropriated such special assessments to the Revenue Account (the Revenue Account) of its Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund previously established by the City; and that, on or before each date the City is obligated to pay principal of or interest on such portion of the Bonds, the City will transfer from its Revenue Account to a separate General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2012 Bond Fund an amount sufficient for the payment of such principal and interest on such date; and the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds net revenues of the storm water utility and sanitary sewer and water utility of the City; that in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed with the owner of the Bonds that it will impose and collect charges for the service, use and availability of its storm water utility and sanitary sewer and water utility at the time and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds and on all other bonds payable from net revenues of the storm water utility and sanitary sewer and water utility as such principal and interest respectively become due; that if needed to pay the principal and interest on this Bond, ad valorem taxes will be levied upon all taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. -10- This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the.City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA City Manager Mayor ..CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is. one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative p The following abbreviations, when used; in the inscription, on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were -written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA ...........:..... Custodian ...................... in common (Cust) : (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... TEN ENT -- as tenants (State) by entireties '11- JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book - Entry System The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. -12- (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the `Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it, is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository -13- and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. Use of Proceeds.. 3.01. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. All proceeds of the Bonds received from the Purchaser allocated to the Refunding Bonds are irrevocably appropriated to pay and redeem the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to redeem the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date. 3.02. General Obligation Bonds Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2012A Improvement Construction Fund. The City hereby establishes as a special subaccount in the Construction Fund of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2012 Improvement Construction Fund (the "Series 2012 Improvement Construction Fund ") as a separate bookkeeping account on its books and records. There shall be deposited into the Series 2012 Improvement Construction Fund, when and as received, the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds allocated to the Improvement Bonds. There shall be established a separate account within the Series 2012 Improvement Construction Fund to record expenditures for each Improvement. The moneys in the Series 2012 Improvement Construction Fund will be disbursed by the City, in accordance with this Resolution and the -14- City's normal procedures, to pay (or reimburse the City for) the costs of the Improvemenrts, including also the issuance costs of the Improvement Bonds pursuant to Section 9 hereof. At such time as the Improvements are completed the City shall transfer any remaining balance in the Series 2012 Improvement Construction Fund as provided in Resolution No. 2005 -70. 3.03. General Obligation Bonds Series 2012A Utilities Construction Fund. There is hereby established in the official books and records of the City, a separate General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A Utilities Construction Fund (the "Series 2012 Utilities Construction Fund "). The City hereby appropriates to the Series 2012 Utilities Construction Fund all proceeds of the Bonds received from the Purchaser allocated to the Utilities Bonds and to pay the issuance costs of the Utilities Bonds pursuant to Section 9 hereof. The Series 2012 Utilities Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Utilities Improvements, including but not limited to the transfer to the Utilities Bond Fund, created in Section 4.02 hereof, of amounts sufficient for the payment of interest, due upon the Utilities Bonds prior to the completion of the Utilities Improvements and the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Utilities Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Utilities Improvements, any balance of the proceeds of Utilities Bonds remaining in the Series 2012 Utilities Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in part, of any other improvements to the Utilities, as directed by the City Council, but any balance of such . proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid to the. Utilities Bond Fund. Section 4. Bond Funds. 4.01. General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2012 Bond Fund. So long as any of the Improvement Bonds or the Refunding Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City shall maintain a separate debt service fund on its official books and records to be known as the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2012 Bond Fund (the "Improvement Bond Fund ") within the Debt Service Account of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (the "Debt Service Account "), and the principal of and interest on the Improvement Bonds and the Refunding Bonds shall be payable from the Improvement Bond Fund. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Improvement Bond Fund (a) all moneys transferred with respect to the Improvement Bonds and the Refunding Bonds from other accounts within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Debt Service Account in accordance with this Resolution; and (b) all other moneys as shall be appropriated by the City Council to the Improvement Bond Fund from time to time. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on the Improvement Bonds and the Refunding Bonds are to be paid by the City in accordance with this resolution, the City Finance Director shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Debt Service Account. in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Improvement Bond Fund an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Improvement Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all Improvement Bonds and Refunding Bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the City Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient -15- amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory limitation. 4.02. Utilities Bond Fund. The Utilities Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Utilities Bonds, Series 2012A Bond Fund (the "Utilities Bond Fund "), which the City agrees to maintain until the Utilities Bonds have been paid in full. If the balance in the Utilities Bond Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on bonds payable therefrom, the City Finance Director shall nevertheless provide sufficient money from any other funds of the City which are available for that purpose, and such other funds shall be reimbursed from subsequent receipts of net revenues of the Utilities appropriated to the Utilities Bond Fund and, if necessary, from the proceeds of the taxes levied for the Utilities Bond Fund. The City Finance Director shall deposit in the Utilities Bond Fund the proceeds of all taxes levied and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of such bonds and interest, including the net revenues of the Utilities herein pledged and appropriated to the Utilities Bond Fund, all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Utilities Bonds, and all other moneys received for or appropriated to the payment of the Utilities Bonds and interest thereon. Section 5. Leyy of Special Assessments. Faith and Credit Pledged. 5.01. Leyy of Special Assessments. The City has previously levied special assessments against lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited by the improvements financed by the Refunded Bonds, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20 %) of the cost of such improvements. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of each of the Improvements it will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20 %) of the cost of the Improvements. In the event that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City's officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property._ The Council presently estimates that the special assessments levied for payment of the cost of the Improvements shall be in the principal amount of $ payable in not. more than 15 installments, the first installment to be collectible with taxes during the year 2014, and that deferred installments shall bear interest at the rate of per annum from the date of the resolution levying said assessment until December 31 of the year in which the installment is payable. 5.02. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably. pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the -16- Bonds, and the Bonds shall be payable from the Improvement Bond Fund and the Utilities Bond . Fund in accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this resolution. It is estimated that the special assessments levied and to be levied for the payment of the Improvements and net revenues of the Utilities pledged to the payment of the Utilities Bonds will be collecte&in amounts not less than five percent (5 %) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements of the Bonds. Section 6. Imposition of Charges: Additional Bonds. The City hereby covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Utilities Bonds that so long., as, ny of the Utilities Bonds are outstanding, the City will impose'and collect reasonable charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities to the City and_its inhabitants according to schedules calculated to produce net revenues which, will be sufficient to. pay all principal and, interest when due on the Utilities Bonds and all other�obligations..payable from the net revenues of the Utilities. Net revenues of the Utilities; to the ektent necessary, are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the principal of the Utilities Bonds and interest thereon; provided that nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and . appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities for the payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the City Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Utilities Bonds and paid therefrom and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of said net revenues may be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation herein made, as to the application of net revenues received from time to time. Section 7. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment- thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the-due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its, obligations with respect to any prepayable' Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal` t6 the principal, interest and 'redemption premium,'if any, which are then due, prow ded`that notice of such redemption- has been duly given as provided herein. The. City-may also at any discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent" for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 8. County Auditor Registration Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money Arbitrage and Official Statement. -17- 8.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 8.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 8.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations ") as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 8.04. Arbitrap-e Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 8.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 8.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated October 4, 2012, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized of behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering -18- price, the interest:rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange. Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. .8.07. Reimbursement. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect, to the financed facilities which the City paid or will'have paid more than 60 .days prior to the issuance of the Bonds , unless, with, respect to such prior expenditures, the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies' with the provisions,of Section' 1.150 -2 of the Regulations, provided that a declaration of official intent shall not be required (i) I with respect to certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the financed facilities meeting the requirements of Section 1.150- 2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to "preliminary expenditures" for the financed facilities as defined in Section 1.150- 2(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the "issue price" of the Bonds. Section 9. Continuing - Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this'Section 9, any. person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of.any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce.performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 9, including an action.for a writ of . mandamus or specific performance. Direct,. indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 9 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this Section 9, "Owner" or `Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar -19- or any "Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, "Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in'Section 6 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information"): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the -20- Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 9 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 -TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; -21- (H) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or a similar event with respect to the City; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material and (1) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 9 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 9 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). SWA __ ___ _ (2) All documents provided to.the MSRB pursuant to this subsection:(c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1), iThe covenants of the City in this Section 9 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 9 shall terminate and be, without further effect as of any date on which the'City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative. actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to :comply with the requirements of this Section 9 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the =Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1'934; as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 9 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, onbetter complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 9 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect atgthe time of the primary offering; and (iii) such-amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or opdratingi data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph. (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 10. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. -23- Attest: Adopted this 16th day of October, 2012. Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -24- COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies, that there has been filed in my office a'certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on October 16, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $11,935,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012A, dated as of November 15, 2012. I further certify that. said Bonds have been entered on my bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of October, 2012. -25- CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $820,000 TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012B Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 16, 2012 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through 18 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-139 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $820,000 TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012B I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. October, 2012. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of Debra Mangen, City Clerk a It was reported that () proposals had been received prior to 10:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $820,000 Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] RESOLUTION NO. 2012'139 then,introduced the following RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING, SALE, PRESCRIBING THEFORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $820,000 TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012B BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City,of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section' 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. The City has presently outstanding its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009B (the "Series 2009B Bonds "), initially dated as of April 29, 20099 and its General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2009C, initially dated as of December 10, 2009 (the "Series 2009C Bonds "), issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (the "Act"), and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Series 2009C Bonds and a portion of the Series 2009B Bonds are payable primarily out of the net revenues to. be derived from the municipal golf courses, ice arena, swimming pool and liquor stores of the City, (the "Net Revenues "). This Council has previously determined to issue and sell. $820,000 principal amount of Taxable General Obligation Bonds; Series 2012B, of the City (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in connection with the construction of a training center at Braemar Arena (the "Project "), including every item Iof cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota. Statutes, Section 475.65: The Bonds are payable primarily out of the Net Revenues (the "Net Revenues "). The Project to be financed by the Bonds does not include any portion of the construction at . Braemar Arena of space to be used for the operation of a sporting goods store. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds the City is,also issuing its General Obligation. Bonds, Series 2012C (the "Seri es 2012C Bonds "), pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, which will be payable, primarily out of the Net Revenues. 1.02. Findings: It is hereby found, determined and; declared that the Net Revenues in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on the - Bonds, the Series 2009C Bonds, the Series 2012C Bonds and the portion of the Series. 2009B for which the Net Revenues are pledged (the "Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds"). 1.03. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475:60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, . (__) proposals. for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of of , and associates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to'be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates, Payment. The Bonds shall be designated Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B, shall be originally dated as of November 15, 2012, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, from November 15, 2012 until paid at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate 2014 $105,000 2015 120,000 2016 125,000 2017 125,000 2018 125,000 2019 130,000 2020 90,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2013, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. -2- 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Re ister. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds: Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer; in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed.by the registered-owner thereof or by an attorney duly, authorized by the registered owner in writing, the . Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees,. one or in ore�new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the.books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is.presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal; in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized (f) Persons Deemed Owners., The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond -whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange. of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. =3- (h) Mutilated Lost Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it,and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. 0) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying Agent. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. The Bonds are not be subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: -4- Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount] [Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its. stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice 'of the call for redemption thereof to be published as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest.] Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals.. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall, cease to be such officer before the delivery` of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and'sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office uhtil'delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or, entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until I a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. -5- 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2012B Interest Maturity Rate Date % February 1, 20 REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: R Date of Original Issue CUSIP November 15, 2012 THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, without option of prior payment, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2013 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $820,000,.all of like date and tenor, except as to maturity date, interest rate, and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 16, 2012 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of financing improvements to the City's ice arena, and is issued pursuant to and in full -6- conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. Notice of redemption shall be given as provided in the following paragraph.] As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that, by the Resolution the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds the net revenues of the City's golf courses, swimming pool, ice arena and liquor stores as shall be required to pay such principal and interest and on a parity with the pledge of such net revenues to the payment of other outstanding bonds of the City; that if necessary for payment of -7- the principal and interest, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA City Manager CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION. Mayor This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA ................. Custodian ...................... in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... -8- TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants (State) with right of survivorship and • not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns`and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change ' whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor•.institution" meeting the T equirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership_ or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) orsuch other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange'Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] -9- a r 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book -Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the "Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. -10- (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. 2012B Taxable General Obligation Bonds Construction Fund. Proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in a separate Series 2012B Taxable General Obligation Bonds Construction Fund (the "Construction Fund ") which shall be created and maintained on the books of the City as a separate account. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Project and of costs of issuance of the Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Project, any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund shall be credited and paid to the Bond Fund created pursuant to Section 4 hereof. Section 4. Bond Fund. 4.01. 2012B Taxable General Obligation Bond Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund "), which the City agrees to maintain until the Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which -11- other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Bond Fund. There shall be credited to the Bond Fund the following: (a) All collections of any taxes levied for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the Net Revenues herein pledged and appropriated to the Bond Fund. (b) The sum of $ from Net Revenues, which amount shall be credited to a separate subaccount in the Bond Fund as a reserve for the Bonds as required by the Act, and which amounts equal the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds and is required to be deposited therein pursuant to the Act. (c) Any other funds appropriated by the City for the payment of the Bonds. 4.02. Pledge of Net Revenues. The Net Revenues are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon when due and the maintenance of the reserve account required by the Act. The pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Bonds and maintenance of the reserve account is on a parity with the pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the Net Revenues for payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated Net Revenues will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to the payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and additional obligations, for payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of Net Revenues may be made superior or subordinate to, or on a parity with, the pledge and appropriation herein made. Section 5. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. It is, however, presently estimated that the funds appropriated pursuant to Section 4 hereof will provide sums not less than 5% in excess of principal and interest on the Bonds when due, and therefore no tax levy is presently required. Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, -12- provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 7. County Auditor Registration Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money Arbitrage and Official Statement. 7.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require; and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and finnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 7.03. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 7.03, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 7.03, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding -13- anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 7.03 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this Section 7.03, "Owner" or `Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any `Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, `Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 6 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. -14- Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements. as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall, provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. ,The, City shall clearly. identify.in the Disclosure Information each document so 'incorporated by reference. If any.part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations.of the City.have materially chan ged or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City` includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as de .fined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 7.03 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of any of the following events, with respect to the Bonds: (A) Principal, and interest payment delinquencies; (B): Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D)' Unscheduled "draws on creddenhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events . affecting the tax status of the Bonds; -15- (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or a similar event with respect to the City; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material and (1) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 7.03 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 7.03 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: -16- (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term-, Amendments, Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 7.03 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 7.03 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar, an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of. legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 7.03 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 7.03 (arid the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies. with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 7.03 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in. the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 7.03 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 8. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the -17- payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Adopted this 16th day of October, 2012. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the of adoption r p the.foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon,. the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies' that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on October 16, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota; setting forth the form and details of an issue of $820,000 °Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B, dated as of November 15, 2012. I further certify that said,Bonds have been entered on my bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. „ WITNESS my hand. and official seal this day of , 2012. County Auditor (SEAL) CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $2,115,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012C Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 16, 2012 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages .1 through 19 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-140 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $2,115,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012C I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and. other actions taken and of all documents approved by-the governing body at said meeting, so.far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of October, 2012. Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that (__) proposals had been received prior to 10:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $2,115,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2012 7140 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $2;115,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2012C BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina; Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. The City has presently outstanding its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009B (the "Series 2009BBonds "), initially dated as of April 29, 20099 and its General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2009C, initially dated as of December 10, 2009 (the "Series 2009C. Bonds"), issued pursuant'to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (the "Act "), and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Series 2009C Bonds and a portion of the Series 2009B Bonds are payable primarily out of the net revenues to be derived from the municipal golf courses, ice arena, swimming pool and liquor stores of the City (the "Net Revenues "). This Council has previously determined to issue and sell $2,115,000 principal amount of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C, of the City (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in connection with the construction of improvements to Braemar Arena (the "Project "), including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65. The Bonds are payable primarily out of the Net Revenues (the "Net Revenues "). The Project to be financed by the Bonds does not include any portion of the construction at Braemar Arena, of space to be used. for the operation of a training center or a sporting goods store. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds the City is also issuing its Taxable'General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B (the "Series 2012B Bonds "), pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, which will be payable primarily out of the Net Revenues. 1.02. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the Net Revenues in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal" year on the Bonds, the Series 2009C Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds and the portion of the Series 2009B for which the Net Revenues are pledged (the "Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds "). 1.03. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, C_) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of , of , and associates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities: Interest Rates; Denominations; PaMent.. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C, shall be originally dated as of November 15, 2012, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, from November 15, 2012 until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate 2020 $ 45,000 2021 135,000 2022 140,000 2023 140,000 2024 145,000 2025 150,000 2026 155,000 Year Amount Rate 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 $155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered fdrm. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2013, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. -2- 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar"). The effect of registration and the rights and duties`: of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Re ig ster. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. _ (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner:.thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form. satisfactory, to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly'authorized by the registered.owner'inwriting; the Registrar shall authenticate and'deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or, transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount. and maturity, as requested. by the transferor: The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount -and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith; to make transfers_ which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City,and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Borid'is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether'such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's' order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to,the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. -3- (h) Mutilated Lost Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. 0) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying Agent. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon'thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2020 through 2022 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2023 through 2033 shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2022 and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption -4- date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amountl Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, -5- executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the following form: Iw UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2012C Interest Maturity Rate Date % February 1, 20_ REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: Date of Original Issue CUSIP November 15, 2012 THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, without option of prior payment, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2013 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. -6- This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,115,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to maturity date, interest rate, and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 16, 2012 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of financing improvements to the City's ice arena, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any - multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2022 and earlier years are payable on their respective, stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates -in 2023 and later years are each subject to.redemption and; prepayment. at the option of the City, in.whole or in part, and if in part in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2022 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. Notice of redemption shall be given as provided in the following paragraph.] As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof.together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational -7- arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that, by the Resolution the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds the net revenues of the City's golf courses, swimming pool, ice arena and liquor stores as shall be required to pay such principal and interest and on a parity with the pledge of such net revenues to the payment of other outstanding bonds of the City; that if necessary for payment of the principal and interest, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA City Manager CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Mayor This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: -8- U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they.were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA ................. Custodian ...................... in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... TEN ENT -- as tenants (State) by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bon&and all.rights thereunder, and hereby, irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment . must correspond. with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. -9- Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an ".eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book -Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the `Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of -10- and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with. respect to the principal anddriterest on the Bonds to the. extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the.effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to :do so, the City, and the Registrar shall COOP erate "with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able,-upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the, Bonds, or 0i):. o make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering -ownership'ttansferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that.it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to, be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository. in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e), Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal, and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f)" In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section --is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g); the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. '(g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only`System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements. with the securities depository described herein; and;thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. -11- Section 3. 2012C Recreational Facility Construction Fund. Proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in a separate Series 2012C General Obligation Recreational Facility Bond Construction Fund (the "Construction Fund ") which shall be created and maintained on the books of the City as a separate account. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Project and of costs of issuance of the Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Project, any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund shall be credited and paid to the Bond Fund created pursuant to Section 4 hereof. Section 4. Bond Fund. 4.01. 2012C Recreational Facility Bond.Fund. The Recreational Facilities Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2012C Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund "), which the City agrees to maintain until the Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Bond Fund. There shall be credited to the Bond Fund the following: (a) All collections of any taxes levied for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the Net Revenues herein pledged and appropriated to the Bond Fund. (b) The sum of $ from Net Revenues, which amount shall be credited to a separate subaccount in the Bond Fund as a reserve for the Bonds as required by the Act, and which amounts equal the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds and is required to be deposited therein pursuant to the Act. (c) Any other funds appropriated by the City for the payment of the Bonds. 4.02. Pledge of Net Revenues. The Net Revenues are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon when due and the maintenance of the reserve account required by the Act. The pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Bonds and maintenance of the reserve account is on a parity with the pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the Net Revenues for payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated Net Revenues will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to the payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and additional obligations, for payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of Net Revenues may be made superior or subordinate to, or on a parity with, the pledge and appropriation herein made. Section 5. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, -12- credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. It is, however, presently estimated that the funds appropriated pursuant to Section 4 hereof will provide sums not less than 5% in excess of principal and interest on the Bonds when due, and therefore no tax levy is presently required. Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City,may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by by with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called, for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according'to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal., interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided.herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 7. 7.01. ColnAuditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the -City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under, their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 7.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken-by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations ") as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of -13- issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 7.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 7.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 7.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated October 4, 2012, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized of behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC" }under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. -14- If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 9, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 9, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive,' damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 9 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in''this Section 9, "Owner" or "Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing iri'the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any `Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner, provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficiA16wriers14 in form arid, substance .reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, "Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " mean s when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 6 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, ;. commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 the following financial information and operating data in respect.of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law. as m`'effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such fmancial statements have not been prepared in: accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for. reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and• certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material.respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material -15- respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can. no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 9 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; -16- (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the.issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, °or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; ,(H) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; •(J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or a similar event with respect to the City; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of-the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement, to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material.. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City. to provide the Disclosure Information; required under.paragraph (1) of this subsection (b),,at the time specified thereunder; (B)' the amendment or, supplementing of this Section 9 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this- Section 9 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and -17- (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 9 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 9 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 9 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 9 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 9 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 9 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. -18- Section 9. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds all to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Adopted this 16'' day of October, 2012. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -19- COUNTY AUDITOR'S ChK"1.W1CA 1 r; AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin t - County, Minnesota; hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office.a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on October 16, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $2,115,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C, dated as ofNovember 1.5, 2012. I fixrther certify that said Bonds have been entered on my;bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as required by'Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475,.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day.of 201.2. County Auditor (SEAL) �gtrTA, p e ,see To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.C. & D. From: John Wallin Action X❑ Finance Director Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Second Reading Ordinance No. 2012 -15 Franchise Ordinance CenterPoint Energy and Second Reading Ordinance No. 2012 -16 Franchise Ordinance Xcel Action Requested: Adopt second readings of Ordinance 2012 -15 and Ordinance 2012 -16 creating franchise fees for the City's natural gas and electric utilities. Information / Background: At the Council's retreat meeting in February idea was introduced of implementing a modest franchise fee of the Edina customers of Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy to create a new revenue stream that would be specifically dedicated to funding new improvements sidewalk, trail and non - motorized transportation projects around the city. These projects are currently funded from the City's annual Capital Improvements Plan or from special assessments. The Council expressed interest in the franchise fee concept and asked staff to research the issue in more depth. At the Council's June 5 Work Session, in addition to conducting a review of the City's Special Assessment Policy, the Council also considered a more formal proposal to fund a new sidewalk, trail and non - motorized transportation improvement program through the adoption of utility franchise fees. The Council formally considered two new ordinances at the August 6 Council meeting and approved first reading to implement new utility franchise fees for the purpose of funding for new sidewalks, . trails, lighting, street markings and related costs that will increase the safety of the City's pedestrian, cyclist and non - motorized transportation system. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' Sc • Edina, MN 55424 If the two new ordinances are adopted by the City Council, the City will create a new fund called the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS Fund) to account for the new franchise fee revenues. The franchise fee revenues will be a dedicated revenue to the PACS Fund. The PACS Fund will be used to fund construction and maintenance activities, lighting, right -of -way acquisition, consulting and staff costs related to the expansion and improvement of the City's sidewalk, trail and non - motorized transportation system. The proposed franchise fee for a residential utility account is $1.45 /month for both Xcel and CenterPoint customers for a total of $2.90 /month. According to data supplied to the City by the two utilities, the average residential customer natural gas bill is $90.25 /month and average residential electric bill is $89.17 1month. The addition of the proposed franchise fees raises the monthly bill in each case by approximately 1.6 %. There are higher monthly fees for commercial accounts that are described in detail in the ordinances. In all classes of customers, however, the new franchise fees are flat fees that do not vary with the consumption. Franchise fees are applied to each customer meter regardless of the property tax status of the customer. Non - profit organizations, schools, churches and government utility customers will be assessed franchise fees based on the type of meter /service status they have through their respective utility companies. If adopted by the Council, the proposed franchise fee structure in the new ordinances will create approximately $1.1 million each year in new revenue for the purpose of increasing the safety of the City's pedestrians, cyclists and drivers at a financial impact to our residents of $2.90 /month. If the Council wishes to continue to proceed with the adoption of the franchise fees, the next step in the process is to adopt second reading on the two ordinances (2012 -15 and 2012 -16) at the October 16, 2012 Council Meeting. Following adoption on first reading on August 6, 2012, the City provided an official 60 day notice to each utility of the City's impending action. During that 60 day period, the utilities were allowed to comment on the proposed ordinances. The 60 day time period has been completed and the Council may proceed with second reading of the ordinances. The Xcel Energy did not submit any changes to the proposed Ordinance. CenterPoint Energy sent a proposed change and the proposed Ordinance 2012 -15 was changed to reflect the request to clarify that the surcharge can only be passed on to residents of the city, in this case residents of the City of Edina. The updated language is with added language underlined is: SECTION 8. SURCHARGE. The City of Edina recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt second reading on the two new franchise fee ordinances. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 2012 -15 Ordinance No. 2012 -16 ORDINANCE NO. 2012-15 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING A GAS ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA GAS ( "CENTERPOINT ENERGY") FOR PROVIDING GAS ENERGY SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) City means the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. (2) Company means CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas ( "CenterPoint Energy"), its successors and assigns. (3) Franchise Ordinance means Ordinance No. 2003 -2. (4) Notice means a writing served by any party or parties on any other party or parties. Notice to Company shall be mailed to CenterPoint Energy, Minnesota Division Vice President, 800 LaSalle Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55402. Notice to City shall be mailed to the City Clerk at 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. SECTION 2. PURPOSE. The Edina City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide natural gas and electric services within the City. Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on Company. SECTION 3. FRANCHISE FEE STATEMENT AND SCHEDULE. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Company commencing with the February, 2013 billing month, and in accordance with the following fee schedule: Customer Classification Residential Firm A Firm B Firm C Sm Vol, Dual Fuel A (SVDF A) Sm Vol, Dual Fuel B (SVDF B) Lg Vol, Dual Fuel (LVDF) Amount per Account per Month ($) $ 1.45 $ 2.90 $ 9.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 SECTION 4. ACCOUNT FEE. This fee is an account based fee and not a meter -based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this Ordinance has more than one meter, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. In the event any entities covered by this Ordinance have more than one account, each account shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any account, the highest possible fee amount shall apply. SECTION 5. PAYMENT. Franchise fees are to be collected by the Company and submitted to the City as follows: January —March collections due by April 30. April —June collections due by July 31. July — September collections due by October 31. October — December collections due by January 31. SECTION 6. RECORD SUPPORT FOR PAYMENT. The Company shall make each payment when due and, if requested by the City, shall provide a statement summarizing how the franchise fee payment was determined, including information showing any adjustments to the total made to account for any non - collectible accounts, refunds or error corrections. The Company shall permit the City, and its representatives, access to the Company's records for the purpose of verifying such statements. SECTION 7. PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS. Payment to the City will be adjusted where the Company is unable to collect the franchise fee. This includes non - collectible accounts. SECTION S. SURCHARGE.. The City of Edina recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. SECTION 9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this ordinance or for such other relief permitted by law. SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FRANCHISE FEE. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after sending written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to Company by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. SECTION 11. RELATION TO FRANCHISE ORDINANCE. This ordinance is enacted in compliance with the Franchise Ordinance and shall be interpreted as such. SECTION 12. PERMIT FEES. The Company will administer the collection and payment of franchise fees to the City in lieu of permit fees, or other fees that may otherwise be imposed on the Company in relation to its operations as a public utility in the City so long as the following requirements are met: (1) The Company applies for any and all permits, licenses and similar documentation as though this provision did not exist. (2) The Company requests the fee to be waived at the time of application. FIRST READ at .a regular meeting of ,the City Council of the City of Edina on the 6 day of August, 2012, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16 day of October, 2012. First Reading: August 6, 2012 Second Reading: October 16, 2012 Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2012-16 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC SERVICE FRANCHISE FEE ON NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, D /B /A XCEL ENERGY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The City of Edina Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The Edina City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of Edina. (a) Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 1995 -4, an ordinance granting a Franchise to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d /b /a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d /b /a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns, in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 9 of the Northern States Power Company Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A. Subdivision 2. Franchise Fee Statement. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d /b /a Xcel Energy, its successors and assigns, under its electric franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with the Xcel Energy February, 2013 billing month. This fee is an account -based fee on each premise and not a meter -based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this Ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. if the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the .franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this Ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Subdivision 3. Payment. The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9.3 of the Franchise. Subdivision 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission allows the utility company to add a surcharge to customer rates to reimburse such utility company for the cost of the fee and that Xcel Energy will surcharge its customers in the City the amount of the fee. Subdivision S. Record Support for Payment. Xcel Energy shall make each payment when due and, if required by the City, shall provide at the time`of each payment a statement summarizing how the franchise fee payment was determined, including information showing any adjustments to the total surcharge billed in the period for which the payment is being made to account for any uncollectibles, refunds or error corrections. Subdivision 6. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default. regarding this Ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Subdivision 7. Effective Date of. Franchise fee. The effective date of this. Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to Xcel Energy by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. First Reading: August 6, 2012 Second Reading: October 16, 2012 Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: Electric Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise /per month based on metered service to retail customers within the City: Class Residential Sm C &I, Non -Dem Sm C &I, Demand Large C &I Amount Per Month $ 1.45 $ 2.90 $ 9.00 $40.00 Franchise fees are to be collected by the Utility at the rate listed below, and submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: January — March collections due by April 30. April —June collections due by July 31. July — September collections due by October 31. October — December collections due by January 31. ,w91A' Ok! ne ��bttr88 ,ads To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.E. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion ❑X Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Sketch Plan Review Restaurant Proposal At 7700 France Avenue Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to develop the northeast corner of the 7700 France with a single -story 7,500 square foot "fine- dining" restaurant building. The site is 17 acres in size and contains a six -story 319,000 square foot office building and a 7,623 square foot single -story office building (bank) in the southeast corner of the site. Planning Commission Consideration: On September 12, 2012, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) The consensus of the Commission was to support a rezoning to PUD to facilitate construction of a freestanding restaurant. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the September 12, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, September 12, 2012 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`h St. • Edina, MN 55424 spaces to 6,442 spaces based on staff findings and subject to staff co ions. Fischer a recommended that approval is to include direct pedestrian ess to the Sou ale Mall via a 45 degree angle and to also include pede ian access to the transit cility. (Fischer also asked that special thought b� given to find a way to preserve t trees along that access route). Co�,as idner Potts seconded the motion. Ayes, cherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Poteter, Car penter, Staunton, Fischer and Gra 1. Motion carried 9 -0. Commissioner Stauntokmoved to rec mend Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff findings and subiec o staff conditions to include direct pedestrian access to the Southdale Mall a 45 degree angle and to also include pedestrian access to the transit facili Co issioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; Scherer, Forrest, S roeder, Po , Platteter, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer and Grabiel. Motion ca ed 9 -0. Commissio Carpenter moved to recomm d re -plat approval. Commissioner Potts sec ded the motion. All voted aye; Sche r, Forrest, Schroeder, Potts, Platt r, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer and Grabiel. Motion carried 9 -0. VII. REPORTS A. Sketch Plan, Frauenshuh, 7700 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to develop the northeast corner of the 7700 France with a single - story, 7,500 square foot "fine- dining" restaurant building. The site is 17 acres in size and contains a six - story 319,000 square foot office building and a7,623 square foot single story office building in the southeast corner of the site. The restaurant would be designed for seating up to 250 people, and would provide 93 dedicated parking spaces in addition to the shared parking with the office buildings. Teague said the proposed building would be made of high quality stone, glass and metal. An area for outdoor dining would also be provided, however, is not guaranteed to be utilized. Teague asked the Commission to note that the primary issues with this request is that a free - standing restaurant is not a permitted use in the POD -2 zoning district; however, a restaurant is a permitted accessory use within an office building. Teague said if the Commission and Council are receptive to allowing a restaurant in this location the applicant would needs to decide on two options; 1) a PUD rezoning and 2) Ordinance amendment to allow restaurants as a permitted use in the POD -2 zoning district. Page 10 of 12 Concluding Teague also stated if this proposal "moves forward" a traffic study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways. Appearing for the Applicant David Anderson, Frauenshuh. Comments f Questions' Commissioner Fischer said this seems reasonable considering the size of the tract and asked Planner Teague if he knows the reason a freestanding restaurant isn't allowed in a POD -2 zoning district. Teague responded he really doesn't know the history behind this decision. Commissioners said maybe the decision to exclude freestanding restaurants in this zoning district was to prevent fast -food restaurants from popping up. Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson briefed the Commission on the history of the property. He said the site is 17 acres that consists of a principal multi -story office building totaling 319,000 square -feet. Anderson explained that the site includes underground parking spaces for building tenants and ample surface parking with over 1,400 parking spaces for building tenants and guests. Continuing, Anderson said the property has a solid appeal in the market place and is in a sound financial position. Anderson said this.request is a direct response to market interest. He noted the property is very large and the proposed building isn't very large. Anderson introduced Eric Reiner of Sperides Reiner Architect. Mr. Reiner informed the Commission that at this time they are not working with a particular restaurant. company. They are only working_off directives to develop a restaurant that engages France Avenue and complements the office building(s). Chair Grabiel noted if you look up and down France Avenue there are a number of restaurants. Grabiel asked if there was a decision on the type of restaurant. Mr. Reiner responded that their goal is an upscale high service restaurant. Commissioner Carpenter asked if the applicant viewed the site in broader terms. Mr. Anderson responded that if one views the site the proposed location of the restaurant is on a natural pad. Anderson explained that at this time the office market is slow; however, if a PUD is granted the option of amending the PUD would remain. Concluding, Anderson said at this time they believe a high -end restaurant addressing France Avenue is a great fit for the area and of benefit to the site itself. Commissioner Forrest said she agrees with a rezoning to PUD, adding it's a great idea trying to incorporate the restaurant to work with the public realm. Page 11 of 12 Commissioner Platteter agreed that a PUD rezoning is this situation was best. Platteter said in his opinion changing the Ordinance to allow this isn't the way to proceed. Changing the Ordinance could open the door to less desirable proposals. Commissioner Fischer said he likes this concept and in his opinion PUD is the correct way to proceed. Fischer added this fits the "theme" of doing innovative things with large parking lots. Commissioner Schroeder stated he agrees this is a good concept; however, the pedestrian physical connection is missing because the area lacks sidewalks. Chair Grabiel stated the consensus of the Commission appears to support a rezoning to PUD to facilitate construction of a freestanding restaurant. Grabiel encouraged the applicant to proceed to the City Council with their sketch plan. VII. CORRESRONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel ackno edged back o/pake aterials. VIII. CHAIR AND COM SION CChair Grabiel said the joint w k seeen the City Council and Commission was constructive. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported.th , Starbuck will be back before the Commission on October 10th with a revised plan/Potts T ague told the ommission Starbucks is rotating their building similar to the ade. by.Commis 'oner Staunton. Jordan Gilgene Commission to n tea new interactive City website SpeakUpEdin X. ADJOURN Commissiond adjournment at 10: 0 PM. Commissioner Plattete r seconded th voted aye; motion to a 'ourn carried. !%aa�iie �{oo Respectfully submitted Page 12 of 12 City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: September 12, 2012 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — Restaurant (7700 France Avenue) :1Mc w9SN�11'� o e v � �O The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to develop the northeast corner of the 7700 France with a single -story 7,500 square foot "fine- dining" restaurant building. (See property location on pages Al —A4a; and the sketch plan proposal on pages A5 —A10.) The site is 17 acres in size and contains a six -story 319,000 square foot office building and a 7,623 square foot single -story office building (bank) in the southeast corner of the site. The restaurant would be designed for seating up to 250 people, and would provide 93 dedicated parking spaces in addition to the shared parking with the office building. A shared parking operation would work well here given the differing peak time of operations for the restaurant and office. The proposed building would be made of high quality stone, glass and metal. An area for outdoor dining would be provided, however, is not guaranteed to be utilized. The primary issue with this request is that a free - standing restaurant is not a permitted use in the POD -2 zoning district. A restaurant is a permitted accessory use within an office building. If the Planning Commission and Council believe the proposed use is reasonable for the site, there are two options on how a formal application may be pursued: 1. Rezone the site to a zoning district that allows a restaurant. PUD rezoning could be a possibility. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow restaurants as a permitted use in the POD -2 Zoning District. Attached are maps that show where the POD -2 Zoning Districts are located within the City of Edina. (See pages All Al 3.) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO 1j.�, Compliance Table Traffic /Parking A traffic study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard (POD -2) Proposed Building Setbacks 10- story building Front — France 35 feet 35 feet Side - North 20 feet 30 feet Side — South 20 feet 200+ feet Rear — West 20 feet 200+ feet Building Height 4 Stories or 48 feet whichever One story 20 is less feet tall Building Coverage 30% 15% Maximum Floor Area .50 of the tract .44 of the tract Ratio (FAR) Tract size = 17 acres or Gross s.f. = 740,520 s.f. 326,623 s.f. Parking Stalls (Site) 1358 spaces office + 1400+ spaces restaurant Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Traffic /Parking A traffic study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Rf Edina mc — Ing milic gm Z-- mc Mr. ZZ M:M! Ow Legend Illighlighted Feature City LI.R. H Creeks Lako. ED Parks Par-1. one N W -rem INJU wirpal-A lose min ,::•= 1111 III Iflllll ,1111 I�IIB :: •• •■ • ■II _, =, 11111111.E +R /�: \ ►II fRR1, ►R�11� i �i ii Me 2 �/ t/. �fJ..� '■ � ii j .1i illlllliiiiiiii ��'.' �', � `��-■ logo : ='r ������i■ � L Am NEIN I All, 41 City of Edina . -7319 IOR 7J21� 7J1i0 .[t B02 90.7sp /-0�y1 +517 •SJpxl1'73]]li 7717 73767710 1777 SM•- rylr.. ' &1i R�22a0.'11701 7,73JT_7401 • .Y .7790 - 7377 ' i" 2205101 •71 113 " 203k 7707 1140] �•* 712102 100 -71I ♦1 F���`� ,o, . 4 J _ y t R 709 I2r F 7 v ` U *•.� 7151 � 1101 "1 ■1■ UL'it - arJ1 ,...0 r� 72.r 1, '' „� p .s. 4' JJIS � �t 1 • I r i 1. J�151 1775 'y\422p - SSSE .. F I •' ' r, .i yY-W;^ � �• '] S U .J « JSSU SJtJ” 400 ' 4fU0 1 7550 fir SrF V1 S 5JJ5 -�` JU •.•._ _ ]e jN ST iY � S� 1 t in 7600; t r' � ' � � ! 'f}. • . I • r 7600 7415 JJSf `�• G L7TbR.td 7... - - 7r'� \� _:yltf ' •' f !I7 4175• �'1i :•C:.T:Y3.::: .7803 -y: Y �'3F01H /. -•~ Js3p� y uoljj� -�� :6t:^ 7175 Y r�i.ni:� Y. 14' lt+ 0.: �' dJ251� 4225' J, �•[ � ` T F JL � t: i 1 sv..M g} x I'7'IT471T 72 �k #.�niy anwex7: a ram -r- J7Jp �j TA 3901 .tom 7sooi f a` i? 4 360, t a t a'a. 4250 1300 2001 • Tear l4 :e �410f 11,1 v PID:3102824440013, le 7700 France Ave S Nl,d Ip N IV L Edina, MN 55435 Legend Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels N City Limits Creeks OLake Names OLakes E] Parks E] Parcels 2009 Aerial Photo City of Edina - -:_ *� ♦ '. • i a+3' t'--�� r +�a j, ��7 Li Legend ne ul Surrwndi House Number 1cr'+s: w Labels _•R- 4 r ` ¢r ra'. -- - .. - 1 ,.I ml s/ I' t i •■ ■ _ _ 7 1 .,a. ■ r�■�ay 1 rc 'y: ��r({el Nr jcNIF■ ■v 1. i _ r • House Number Label. Street Name Labels �/ City Limits rr■[�rlt■ I arsr h� v�x we'►w11ii1 M � t :. III - - - - _ `/1/- Creeks Lake Names ;. s L tm °/�,l�xR��piR�fi 7605 - si O I _ - 7600 •: „[ 1 : •f- Lakaa Parks r _!!�R (1 = r r .-., �_ - • _ V 1 1 n Sr T - E] Parcels ..T ",�N ■1■ it - f ill �::: =��. j•��y►y'"�• fly -- ��, - 2009 Aerial Photo .r, _ .■t 11 ■. i �i' ■ .E'... r. ' r �f trove �. w �1 _ ■ M rr, F__ r _ ' L ' _ - ;Ilf ■r /Mrtln 1■YMi A N . r■ , .faall■.1' Nt �.''r'f -a ^l \ _ '.l �: ■EI1'w►gtil■fr Ra � t �. '.,• -7651 � 2 15 .. r - -•� 7;. rrly.. r�,� -t ,.,rr r- anwlarlrta[�t,F�ny�.., • i �_� �` A n n..A' C MSS _1g7■•1 -` ^' R`•� I' 4Y11 f'1. Ir �. l..'r A as - v,[ ;al.. rrrrarum ramnr /TLtp01[ Illt<m:a ri Ira it p'j(yi %1'- y ia A ':�a� \. rj f1leuAtr'Ifla,lln Iteautear ■r{x+�Ij''aaa.�rm!i�n�� - t ski• I; �: T[pRtltifr0ae�■r rltlrigi 1 lefljllrrrfa7l � `- ?� rl -# - `� mre ln■nf<frvw ■Irw �� r I'm �rn'aawan lnaxilx- :p'J''1 • s' rRFjx4� ' .._ j. axe e t77or t `' r- t_■ fer:rlrs.lt�osf nl1 enrrlrnll'11taxT _ e• % It IIMEI�,�rrrltrl�oplilc r4rlt f ! s '�' � fi I r, -n1�11 i •MIj f r r'rrtM F ""' "�'trw- t • [ Im xf[if al[ Ialilntll f fl{/r�r1�I�tW fir[ � ■ ` j�- T 1kAS11■ -'1't NH�1111 ■Ir ttaT41 t � _+ -�'•� �t�rr L; 1 WNWOiA DR' - I �Tr 4201 N 4100 ■4f 7811 4 II1 4 1 PID:3102824440013 7700 France Ave S�, tia 4 Edina, MN 55435 f. a ��Ct)i�uuii ��� • A City of Edina �♦ s ��`■ - - - ♦ ■ me Legend •�Jj• �: IN - ■ City Llmlts Creeks Parks �� �� zorling ♦ lead .�. ■� ���::: �: ����� �` - ■ r�ru��t •n rur■ a ■. ■�. ..; C rriarr�i ��� � i !purr/ rCy ED . 1 SO �r1 I +r�..,_I�l��I��i �� .■ ...� �. ��:" II 4r �. mill ■ .. Millis mc WAR 2 00a ... �trrlrlrurr . , ■ ��, ■1111uuunu -- :� , -- : unuuna�rranrr :/ .�y���.. ■� __ C� Ull AP IA t S dp pppp- dw ir0 AV t' t FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group August 17, 2012 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Restaurant Development 7700 France Avenue, Edina, MN Dear Mr. Teague: Af1UtAuT W�RRI1frvE K 6 �� it i✓ I - - L-1 7700 France Avenue LLC ( "Owner ") has initiated a site planning evaluation for the development of an approximately 7,500 square foot one story restaurant building on the property located at 7700 France Avenue. Property Background The property is comprised of approximately 17 acres consisting of a principal multi -story office building totaling 319,000 square feet. The building provides a limited number of underground parking spaces for building tenants and ample surface parking with over 1,400 parking spaces for building tenants and guests. In 2005, the Owner constructed a one -story office building consisting of approximately 7,623 square . feet on the southeast corner of the property occupied by Fidelity Investments. Common access drives and surface parking on the east portion of the site serve the principal office building and the Fidelity office building. The property has solid appeal in the marketplace and is in a sound financial position. In 2011, the Owner invested substantial proceeds into exterior entry area upgrades including landscaping, sidewalks and other entry features and amenities. Over the years, the Owner has continued to make substantial investments into common area improvements and ongoing enhancements to the property to appeal to a diverse tenant base in a competitive southwestern suburban office market. Site Plan Concept In assessing market conditions, position of the property and response to strong market interest, the Owner has prepared a layout for a one -story free - standing restaurant of approximately 7,500 square feet on the northeast corner of the site (see attached site plan). The Owner desires to . incorporate a restaurant use both in response to market interest and as a local amenity for office tenants as well as residents and visitors, of the area. rl 7101 West 78th Street, Suite 100 ® Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ® Telephone: 952.829.3480 ® FrauenshuhCommercial.com Cary Teague City of Edina August 17, 2012 Page 2 The restaurant would be designed for seating for up to approximately 250 and would provide approximately 93 dedicated parking spaces in addition to shared parking. The restaurant concept may or may not operate outdoor seating, but the plan would incorporate provisions for such use. Given the ample parking for the overall site, the parking requirements for a restaurant can be easily accommodated during all times of the day and evenings. In addition to dedicated parking, it is anticipated that the restaurant would likely include valet service that would disperse parking to less -used parking areas during operation. Additionally, the peak hours of use for the restaurant (evenings /weekends) would be highly compatible with the daytime /weekday office use of the site. The property is uniquely positioned with excellent France Avenue visibility and frontage, convenient access and ample parking to accommodate the operational requirements for the restaurant. It has not yet been determined whether a separation of the restaurant parcel is necessary but may be a consideration in the development process for functional or zoning purposes. In such case, provisions for cross access, parking and other site plan standards would be evaluated in order to complete a parcel separation and/or rezoning of the property. Si na e The incorporation of both building signage and site signage (monument) integral to the design, scale and overall aesthetic will be an important element of the project. A specific signage plan will be created based on the unique requirements of the user /operator. Restaurant Category /Architectural Concept The restaurant would serve the fine dining market category. The restaurant would be full service with dedicated meal courses designed and operated by an experienced restaurateur /proprietor, credentialed chef and food service staff with a distinctive menu, atmosphere and character. The architectural vision of the project would include "signature" architecture incorporated into a building comprised of high quality materials (stone, glass, metal), distinctive and attractive architectural features and a pedestrian and dining experience that is pleasing for customers. The palette of class A exterior finish materials, including natural stone, brick veneer and architectural metal panels, together with aluminum windows and curtain wall on a liberal scale combine to create an exclusive and refined aesthetic. Materials, colors and composition, especially in the brick, will be carefully selected to complement the existing office building while elegantly projecting the restaurant's brand image. Rich, natural colors and varying roof heights on all sides of the restaurant work togethe�r� ith the unique materials to create a truly four -sided structure that addresses those vi ' �'3i1r`�bu' ding, as well as the other structures on the site in which it's developed. ArtiW�� ' alie vast ar s of windows enclosing the dining areas will create a distinctive corn �et weer� t -fiesta ant �� Cary Teague City of Edina August 17, 2012 Page 3 interiors and the surrounding outdoor spaces, as well as France Avenue and its adjacent pedestrian walks. When completed, this building will complement the streetscape, elevate the street -front image along France Avenue, and create another destination for fine dining in Edina. Timing The Owner has not selected a concept and operator but anticipates moving forward with specific zoning, site plan and project development approvals in the near term horizon. Therefore, feedback from the City on the sketch plan and project concept will be helpful in guiding the next step in the development of this project. We look forward to discussing the plan and concept in further detail with the City's staff, Planning Commission and City Council in the near future. If you have questions in the meantime, please contact me at (952)829 -3480. Sincerely, Davi . Anderson Senior Vice President Enclosures: Site Location/Aerial Conceptual Site Plan Conceptual Floor Plan Conceptual Building Elevation cc: Gary Lindstrom, 7700 France Avenue LLC Eric Reiners, SRa .N' I I i r c SHARED 93 DEDICATED SHARED i 'PARKING RESTAURANT PARKING { PARKING I SPACE \ II I bil +' RESTAURANT e BITUMINOUS � � '. I ( ' PAD SITE ±ul.l a�I RESTAURANT _ i .. ..... TER .f, I u_ t I ) , PATIO =• r r-- — — — — — — — - -- -- -- -- i - - - --• - ---- - ---- ---------- ---- -- --- ------ ----- - - - -- - ---- -- - -- -- ____ - OU)I N.S.P. DOCNO 7972A9'�' ~. )/ EASFMENf PFR VLAI I A' - \��NWS oET. .v.LL -III I:. T J OU ] LASEM NT R I C M1 U 1 I I 1_ I , I O �j Q dd n DEDICATED OFFICE �!NE TRAIT C R.t.S. 990 ;i '`' I AND GUEST PARKIN( BITUMINOUS I'. .,. '.., - -�,.'# I l 0 \ N ERLYING TRACT J I' Z II _ I I I 1.3I % 'M1'tl � / 1DRA ` _%� ._ -1 R ET UTIALI,�Y ' - T YAN FEPL l l l l l l l l l Jill I'll _ j t EXISTING OFFICE v 1 ^••POINT OF CUSP BITUMINOUS Il I T- -'Ij BUILDING - - �- - - �- �, ...19.to L ♦ . ` 7 fiAi i - j jl - 1oc.00 PONGNC EASEMENT EI DOC PUBLIC ROAC EASEY HT II I / - S n ,y5 N0. 1.3216421 T OITUNINOUI. Z N lLL. O I OND ..... - -�`� n` n 1 5.tl9 d1 _ 4'O.B. • 43324 �LFC.DO - -�� v EASEMENT PER PLAT Y.V`; t A,I�MEAS)ES`( D C.) .. I (1ti STREET EASEMEN yI�.. '%'LR WC.NO.3 ?52149 --'—' 41 TRAFFIC SIGNAL Fn3ENfNT MANN FRANCE PER DOC.NO.3252149 r— TH STREE I „4 ^JEST 6 ST EE- CAWMFNT �« AKA VINNESOTA Olt. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAI I I . NO. 1321642 ST ~412.49 -- •EAST 1216.60 b AVENUE THEATRE SITE MASTER PLAN NOT TO SCALE ..r SPERIDES REINERS CfS,INC. 7 m W WIN h I Par 11 L EAST ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE s R S ",PrRlr)rs RE PFRIDrS IEINERSA#cr S SOUTH ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE SRa. ammunmmmcmmw- 7700 FRANCE AVE. EDINA, MN ENLARGED PLAN rj c +r A `0' 0 c —i 0 PARTIAL SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE IV }}��,��C~ INt J KITCHEN r,1 4 OFF. M WAIT } DINING. ROOM r r I , I I r I , I I t i PATIO I i I � I I I i Z Q V) 1 S T I ui I LU U T I� LL SAN — FA srglemFS , nvc. 1 City of Edina — - -- - - - Legend Street Name Lebelc ./ City Limits /" - -_ -- Creeks Lake Names .� WAY Lekes JOFH HAFAM Parks Zoning 8RA URDLVD ® APO IAut —.&P —g D —I Omoo ISIam D pnt Dialid, .moo - slMaod D-..�dop—;. nantndnd) P.an.nar Pa4 IC..un ey F.I. .I ■ Moo elMOnd D—p— David) ■ PCD I IPJ ..Cenvna Dsj ■ PGD•21PWnd Comv+ermiDatMl ■ PCD a,Pdnna cemtr Dwju __ ■ Pco Aipb—i Comn -w ouwal / �✓ L v 1 O Dm IPWmdl��uatrulD�s1J El PDD 11- -Off --1&1) r® DPOD- 2lPbnnad O11re Datnd) PR D.I IPtah nd ResiCmW Db finl PRD-21Pl — R-- tWO.—I PRD 31P -.,e P—d—tW oi, j PR01IPband R--e Dcfj ■ PRD -S lPUnnsd ResdvtlW Dnri.l i° ■ PSR.AIPtmnnd Senbr Datrn) f� R I I Smgk D—ft., Und) ■ R210ouob Dwevrp Untl RMDJP,n Mdyy David) ElParcelc I c T � e Yaoearfan A�i15 CmyyeiCl = =.a5 G6 RM 0 HiMt: y��J3 _ rr�I Fe o \1 LJ • 411 -11 1 Yccam'+nhrNS C�- q+iC)t_ BLS ]lY Al k o ce City of Edina IIIIi 11� �1�rs', j1j��♦ %�1 ►i�����4r■�rt Legend {1111 Ii. /'�i M��' �; �! ►err: �= f ►i� , •. ► ■iMw r Street 14— Lsbe15 City Li.it. Lk. N�rnps Lkes ►r�r~ _� r11f[j�t.. wr• I�1l� ttt ■ IME *.1 lll� �1 �i_■ �.. OWN �■,■ 111 1 � , Arm +._�,�': BRINK ■ 1111111: �.: El 7 ��Il■ �Mis�� i�1 ■ I ME 0111 lip► �� �� `.1 ft-11S.SUD vu-) Yccam'+nhrNS C�- q+iC)t_ BLS ]lY Al k o ce �l3 of Edina 1 -- -- - - Legend i�V City Limits 1�� ■1 IIIIIR U 1,111: �` � �: � e .1.' r� � M. �I �' •.a on-, on „ ■ iiiii 1111 11r1/1 �� -- 1 1111111 -:11 ED ■ . PRD M El :- �� fllj ��1111111 :. �� iu ■Illlluuuu■ ,C uuuuw uum J 11111111/ C ► :11111 :: P � rtllll ^: = IM i� �l3 Owe���, o �y offt��A� ,Rg. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: Vlll. F. From: Debra Mangen Action 0 City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: October 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -137 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. Attachment: Resolution No. 2012 -137 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50°i St • Edina. MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -137 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Gloria Layton 22 Art Books & Pottery Tools Delores Muntz $25.00 2012 Members Juried Art Show Dated: October 16, 2012 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952- 826 -0390 U) CpRP00 To: Mayor Hovland & Council Members Agenda Item #: IX. A. From: Debra Mangen Action ❑ City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: Oct. 16, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: CORRESPONDENCE Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. No action is necessary. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina Attn: City Council distribution Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Minnehaha Woods Assessment Assessment, Hearing Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council, What procedures and controls. does the City have in place to allocate costs from City hired temporary help? If ;City staff decides it does not Want to do "as built - plans for one of its projects and farms out such. work to a contractor, is it not hiring temporary help? If such work has traditionally been done by City staff in the past what is your position as,to who should pay for such temporary help? Shouldn't this be allocated to the City Engineering department budget? I'S it fair for Minnehaha Woods residents.to be separately assessed for such work and then to pay for such work done on other projects from property tax levies after those project assessments have been levied by the City Council. Please see attached email from City staff. It appears. Minnehaha Woods is subsidizing other City projects. I also note there was 278 foot strip of City property in the Minnehaha Woods project for which no City contribution is being made. This property is heavily used by residents traveling down Minnehaha Creek when the water levels permit such activity. Other City projects have received some City contribution in the past. Thank you for your consideration of the above. Regards, James Grotz 5513 Park Place Edina, Minnesota 55424 Daytime Tel #_952-925-5150 jim @jimgrotz.com a. b. C. d. James Grotz From: Chad Millner <cmillner @EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 12:14 PM To: James Grotz Cc: Sharon Allison Subject: Information Jim, Below are a summary of your questions with answers. Did the engineering work done on MW include "as built plans" ? How much of the work done was for doing City GPS work locating key landmarks (example: fire hydrants) in Minnehaha Woods ? That may not be found in the ledger entries. We are trying to find out how much "other engineering work" which City staff are capable of doing was rolled into this project. We know from the old "as built plans ". those plans were off by 10 to 20 feet from the actual in ground utilities on some streets. Yes engineering work on MW did include asbuilt plans. This is typical to have the consultant complete all the work necessary to final a project. If we did not include it in the engineering fees, City staff would have to complete the work at a later date when workload allowed. We do not know how much of the work was for GPS work as the contract is for construction phase services which includes GPS. 2. We are also looking for the Curb and Gutter breakdown info on Minnehaha Woods to see what was allocated to Curb and Gutter for engineering costs. Also what is the "running footage" for the street surface in Minnehaha Woods, Golf Terrace and Carson's Hill ? Thank you for your assistance with this request. Curb and gutter is funded under the storm sewer column and engineering is spread between the various funding sources. A percentage of the engineering cost is applied to the sewer, water, storm, etc so that residents are not assessed the full engineering costs; for example, based on the proposed amount for each utility, Minnehaha's costs were divided as follows: Sanitary Sewer 16% Storm 17% Water Main 34% Street 34% The running footage of each project is not used for quantity calculation purposes. We use square yards of paving for most of the calculations. Please find the estimated pre- construction square yards of paving as 32,552 SY, 23,549 SY, and 35,412 SY for MW, Golf Ter, and Carsons, respectively. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer E3 r' 952 - 826- 0318IFax 952 -826 -0392 cmillner(a)EdinaMN.QOV l www.EdinaMN.QOv �''' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business \1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:59 AM To: Scott Neal; Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike Lanes on Wooddale Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal. and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 9U -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 I Ibiunnoat7EdinaMN. -g l www.EdinaMN.gov ...FOr hiving; Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Peter Foley II rmailto:pfoleyii(&gmail.coml, Sent: Friday, October '12, 2012 8:49 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Bike Lanes on Wooddale Mayor Hovland, ; As a lifelong Edina resident I have been extremely disappointed with the City Council's desire turn our streets into bike paths. ,.I appreciate your comments in the Sun Current when you stated, vehicle's are now in a secondary position. Vehicles are now totally in a secondary position and why? To appease a Group with Federal dollars? The residents of Wooddale Ave did not want this and now it is total disaster. I commend you for recognizing that this is not working and implore you to make our road safe again. I don't think the City wants to open it self up to liability issues if god forbid some real serious accidents occur. I would be interested to know what the Vote was on this very serious'issue. Who voted for it and who voted against it. I believe it was 3 -2 in favor of creating bike lanes on Wooddale Ave. Thank you and I appreciate your time, on this very serious issue. Peter T. Foley fI, CPCU 5905 Wooddale Ave Edina MN 55424 612 - 978 -2752 i Susan Howl Name: Kathryn Peterson Organization: Website: Address-1: 4303 Country Club Rd Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: kMeterson00@gmail.com Phone: 612 - 751 -1906 Referrer: Message: Mr. Mayor and City Council: I am writing because I feel that the Wooddale Avenue bike lanes are confusing and dangerous. There barely appears to be enough width for cars if the bike lanes are used. While the signs are helpful, the natural instinct of drivers is not to drive over the lines and not to drive in bike lanes. Just a few feet away on Valley View are bike lanes you cannot drive in. I think the biggest issue is that there is no center line and it is unclear where you are supposed to be. It is not intuitive at all. There will always be new, confused drivers on Wooddale. Today on Wooddale I observed 2 people and a dog jogging in the east bike lane. Cars were swerving to avoid the people and it was not clear who belonged where. I sincerely hope you consider removing these lanes before accidents ensue. Thanks, Kathryn Peterson MY qlrne- 4- PO V 49d /o— Vi)Avo�2 c,ty off. E��,N MA/, cvaclv • el e ON �n a Ida i-f- /00 y C�oIV4 - A":el We'll; ka R, 9Lt A/ C A )V f rn y 1 )-wd /4 /40 z-7-op V/ t!.. w t. o �' Yh q ,v A- i a � -rm e- N t4- ee,v don/ Iv �,/ wo ° y2 fSG c ON e oP)/�(,Vol/�,�IVkJ colaA;Olov Tx 7�R e e e cd ,A� ,fin h-, e ti7'`' 01✓ 7-ie ��o 7_/, �7` w," 1l Yr�s� /1E LJ Rt 4Q e el � 1.44 N,i T �19tjz)Je �e_ Ixrq. T19)9Yl a c �S A /2�i4�}/ V� =,e�/ ��V y/ Iyv GtJ W l l Vc LC 1 jj/ �e J� e 'C�x A � . VR A �-rl —, - 2 �L. e v -vh 6 9 'S S 4- 4, -�w e e iJ ,4A)cI I Z I e a S' a it! �tRce-t Gil I�2S'e� CoYY)Yhe -►J�� 0-041V d SeN %o (V cc) /v - D L'C., y L16 Le 3Zoog �AIlekiA IT X 3-s- ag X12, J-� e Ile P i F4 P-,4 k- A dr Ann & Dan Bros 3209 Galleria Unit 1101 October 6, 2012 To the Edina Mayor and Edina City Council: The current project poses some challenges for the City of Edina. This is a excellent opportunity to make this a truly green project for everyone concerned. The City has a chance to be creative in this regard and make it a model for mall redevelopment. Our biggest concern is about foot, bicycle and auto traffic on 69th Street. It seems that too many questions remain on traffic issues. We feel that the planned new entrance would not be safe. Our apartment faces West and South and therefore we witness traffic flow from a unique perspective. We have used the blinking pedestrian crossing area near Gabbert's as well as the crossing between the Galleria and Target. Not all cars observe these areas and we often feel the necessity to race across the traffic lanes and onto the median to cross safely. Did the traffic study include counting all cars traveling 69th Street for a week or so? How will the current interior perimeter road at Southdale Shopping Center be reconfigured? How will left turns be safely made from the South side of Southdale? If a new entrance /exit is built closer to the new development and across from the Westin the traffic turning west onto 69th Street from York could become a huge problem. At the very least roundabouts should be installed to slow traffic such as those on 70th Street. This should also include a bike lane, pedestrian crossing and sidewalks if you are working toward a greener lifestyle. Currently there are no bike lanes East of France near or around Southdale Mall. As an Edina taxpayers we would like to see a comprehensive plan for traffic flow and contingencies for a safe entrance /exit for pedestrians, bicycles and cars before this project is started. Can we work out these logistics in a week or would it be better to take a month or two to understand the complexities first? Let us consider the safety issues before we rush forward with this plan. Thank you, Ann & Dan Bros l 09 P.S. Today's feature article in the Twin City + region section of the Star and Tribune underscores the necessity of planning for pedestrian safety. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:28 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: To Mayor Hovland about Minnehaha Woods assessments Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Elizabeth McGarry fmailto:eimcgarry @comcast.netl Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 4:56 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: To Mayor Hovland about Minnehaha Woods assessments Mayor Hovland: I write in reference to the assessment to homeowners for last year's road and sewer repair. It was unsettling to learn at the last council meeting that the contractor had failed to notify homeowners of a cost option for sewer work much lower than the estimate we had been given originally. During the time that that information was withheld, we were urged to get the work done from our houses to the city's turnoff privately, with the implication that the city's cost to do the work would be higher than a private company's. In addition, those of us whose roads would be done first were also urged to hurry to be done by May 15, so the city work could commence. It seems only fair that our assessments be adjusted to reflect the lower cost of the individual sewer work. I request that the city issue a credit for the difference between the amount paid and the lower estimate, which was withheld, to each homeowner who overpaid for the house -to- shutoff sewer and water updates. It would seem appropriate that this sum be deducted from the payment to the contractor at fault, the one who failed to divulge the updated estimate to the homeowners. You will note that I have not used the terms Type 1 /Type 2, Stage 1 /stage 2, and above 11 feet /below 11 feet. During the discussion. Those terms, which refer to different conditions, were used interchangeably by several speakers from the dais. In any case, types, cuts, or stages, the problem is the same: We were pushed to get work done privately and quickly for the convenience of the project, and we were led to alternatives that were more costly than they should have been. We need to be relieved of the extra expense. Thank you for your attention. Elizabeth Johnson McGarry 5513 Brookview Avenue Edina 55424 952 - 925 -5775 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:43 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Contact Us form submission Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1, IbiunnoCo�EdinaMN.pov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: maiKi)EdinaMN.gov [mailto:mail@EdinaMN.govl Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:14 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Kris Norton Organization: Website: Address 1: 7007 Cornelia Drive Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55435 Email: kainorton(a gmail.com Phone: 952- 200 -1451 Referrer: google Message: Just a frustration note re: The Thurs. night City Council /Mayor \ "debates /discussions /et al.\" Really? The night of the Vice Presidental Debate is, well..., the same. This is the best you can do? Perhaps a different night for Edina since many of us (ok, me) will probably want to see the broadcast. 0 i Susan Howl From: James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:35 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Buckthorn Removal - Edina Day of Service Lynette Biunno, Receptionist E! 9,92-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCa?EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Brian Olson Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 7:56 AM To: 'Heather Haen Anderson' Cc: Scott Neal; James Hovland; ssandrolCdcomcast.net Subject: RE: Buckthorn Removal - Edina Day of Service Heather, In an effort to keep you more informed I have summarized the results of the game plan for the upcoming week or so. Yesterday morning Bob Prestrud, Tom Horwath and Steve Sando met to discuss the concerns and issues at the corner of 54`" Street and Minnehaha. The volunteers will be removing Buckthorn, by hand cutting, and spraying the stumps with Glyphosate (active ingredient in Roundup). The Buckthorn they are spraying is far enough away from the creek that it's o.k. to use. The city tree crew will pick up all the Buckthorn they cut. The city crew will trim deadwood, hangers, and lightly raise a prominent Willow tree at this site. This was requested by Mr. Sando. They will schedule this as soon as possible. There also is a bit of old graffiti on the bridge. Mr. Sando asked if anything could be done about this. This will also be taken care of by a private company that the City hires. We will schedule this as soon as possible as well. Tom Horwath provided Mr. Sando with the stump killing chemical and a good hand saw. Since Steve didn't know how many volunteers will be helping yet, other tools were not made available, however Tom told him to be in touch prior to this weekend if he feels he needs anything else. Because of liability issues we told him he couldn't bring a chain saw to do any of this work. The Buckthorn that he proposes removing was all small enough to be cut by hand. I hope this email finds you well and thank you for helping with this very important day. Please let me know if there is anything else you need for us. Thanks, Brian P.S. Mr Sando, If you see anything that is not accurate in your meeting with the City Forester and Parks Supervisor, please let me know. Ann & Dan Bros 3209 Galleria Unit 1101 October 6, 2012 To the Edina Mayor and Edina City Council: The current Southdale project poses challenges for the City of Edina. This is a excellent opportunity to make this a truly green project for everyone concerned. The City has a chance to be creative in this regard and make it a model for mall redevelopment. As as a Westin owner our biggest concern is about foot, bicycle and auto traffic on 69th Street. It seems that too many questions remain on traffic issues. We feel that the planned new entrance would not be safe. Our condo faces West and South and therefore we witness traffic flow from a unique perspective. We have used the blinking pedestrian crossing area near Gabbert's as well as the crossing between the Galleria and Target. Not all cars observe these areas and we often feel the necessity to race across the traffic lanes and onto the median to cross safely. Did the traffic study include counting all cars traveling 69th Street for a week or so? How will the current interior perimeter road at Southdale Shopping Center be reconfigured? How will left turns be safely made from the South side of Southdale? If a new entrance /exit is built closer to the new development and across from the Westin the traffic turning west onto 69th Street from York could become a huge problem. At the very least roundabouts should be installed to slow traffic such as those on 70th Street. This should also include a bike lane, pedestrian crossing and sidewalks if you are working toward a greener lifestyle. Currently there are no bike lanes East of France near or around Southdale Mail. As an Edina taxpayers we would like to see a comprehensive plan for traffic flow and contingencies for a safe entrance /exit for pedestrians, bicycles and cars before this project is started. Can we work out these logistics in a week or would it be better to take a month or two to understand the complexities first? Let us consider the safety issues before we rush forward with this plan. Thank you, Ann & Dan Bros P.S. Today's feature article in the Twin City + region section of the Star and Tribune underscores the necessity of planning for pedestrian safety. T.I. T: R ut i:0 0401A; om , di� ell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Av I ET A IIE ""UP ,01i ROO_ 11 bhbdim* -Sift 46 11, Wz.A. Oak& FT I I . j 1 NO, LA I 'I CROSSWALK FR®N Rl 8mk7besA& Sam aam aye t �o effac&m Chm the scmdu.d �anew gde elm iJl 11 1 •.il: II 1' 71:1111. - .I. .1'.1' :t .1.. 1 "1•.11.. ■1.,' Y!t�_Vltli '.Iltt•: -.':: :: -' ���'�7 � I�l'1N �1 �;'�YII II., (', 1:.. � am W ladi— —d (D.— �e� 'fm ma IGa mom.° �— aY+sson2�� Eft -Mv #_ it IF "1 -u' u IT, 17 •I 7T 1 J, r' _ - U, ,u ru 1 :l..iir 11 :1 E -jbIt i3C"fiin £3n• 41aq''; + , 1•glu4ly Mw - _ Brian Olson, Public Works Director 952-826-03111 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 i bolson(c?EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Heather Haen Anderson [ mai Ito: infoCa )connectingwithkidsedina.orcil Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:41 PM To: ssandrol(@comcast.net; Brian Olson Subject: Buckthorn Removal - Edina Day of Service Hi Steve and Brian, Scott Neal gave me your contact information in regards to a possible buckthorn removal project along Minnehaha Creek for the Edina Day of Service. The EDS is this Saturday, October 13th. There are not currently any buckthorn removal projects that I know of - though that doesn't mean that one can't be planned! Projects are generally planned by groups or individuals and if they choose to they can open them up to the public by getting posted on the EDS website. The site is there to offer options for people who would.like to participate in the EDS but don't necessary want to plan a project on their own. Knowing that, if you post a project to the EDS site, you may or may not get extra volunteers who show up. Another option is to plan a "closed" project - one that is not open to the public. Some churches and athletic teams go this route. Sometimes it's just a group of friends who get together. Often I do not even know about them ahead of time. Closed projects are welcome, too, of course! The goal of the Edina Day of Service is to celebrate a culture of service in Edina, so as long as the service works toward the common good that .goal is met. Obviously, if that service promotes closer bonds between youth and adults it's all the better! Let me know if you have any questions. Heather Heather Haen Anderson Executive Director Connecting with Kids 952 - 688 -8081 www.ConnectingWithKidsEdina.org 2 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, October 10; 2012 11:29 AM o: Wayne Houle; Scott Neal c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Advisory Lanes Good morning, r This message has.been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members,5cott Neal and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I!Fax 952 - 826 -0389 k' Ibiunno(cilEdinaMN.gov I wwmEdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising, Families & Doing Business From: Michael Truman Finailto:mikeCa)MNTRUMAN.COMI Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:13. AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Advisory Lanes I am writing to inform Edina of my displeasure with the "advisory lanes ". With all the social and economic problems in our society today you vote on this? Waste of money. I will be voting all city council and the mayor out of office. Regards, Mike Truman 5113 Grove Street Edina, MN 55436 612 - 940 -2447 1 Susan Howl Name: Carla Deinema Organization: Edina Resident Website: 5708 Camelback Drive Address 1: Address 2: 5708 Camelback Drive City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55436 Email: cdeinemancomcast.net Phone:9529386360 Message: I would like to go on record to state how ridiculous the new bike lanes are. I drive on 70th multiple times each day - I will never bike. this. I usually have 2 - 3 hockey bags in my hatch. The lanes are now very narrow and the paint is not as distinct as the textured pavement. Why must you do this? I have been driving this route for many years and there have not been bikers on this road. If bikers were present - there was ample room. Edina has a spending problem and this is just the latest incident. Please reconsider these - especially the Woodale area. I worry for my kids on bikes and the false security they may have if biking. I also worry about my soon to be 16 year old driving on these streets. Please reconsider this idea. Thank you- Carla Deinema Susan Howl Subject: Edina Seasons 6455 York Ave S. Sent: Tue, Oct 9, 2012 1:00:57 AM Marc Schillace, Property Manager Prime Management Company Edina Seasons Apartments 6455 York Ave S. Edina, MN 55435 Marc, I have to say that I regret moving into your apartment complex. I should have known from the first day meeting you that this would be the case. We set an apointment to see the place and you didnt show or even have enough respect to call when you didnt come for the showing appointment. We rescheduled by calling you. Again you were not there at the next appointment. We called you again (you didnt call) and you said you were 15 minutes away and would be there soon, we waited 40 minutes for you before you showed up. We see the place and you say you will follow up with us to write up a lease and get a deposit, you never do. We really like the place (the building) and we call you back asking when we could fill out application. You say you will call us back the next day to schedule, YOU DONT. We call you and set an appointent to which you are again 20 minutes late to. We fill out the application and give you the deposit, etc and you say you will follow up with us the next day on an answer. you dont. Guess what, 2 days pass before I again call you. You say no answer back yet but you dont see why it wouldnt all be ok and that you would call us the next day to set up a time to meet to do the lease. AGAIN you dont call and I call you and set the appointment. At that appointment we cannot sign the lease because you are hesitant to put in writing the verbal promises that you have made us, so I write them on the lease (which were that we could have a satellite dish for TV service and that you would stand behind the free Internet that you promised us and even advertised in your rental ad) and you say we will have to come back again to sign lese after you get the OK for the promises which you made to us now that it is written on the lease. *(We never got either by the way) I call you back again when you don't get back to us on those 2 things and we come the next day and sign the lease. Then you offer for us to move in early, we don't ask, you offer and we say great. You don't get back to us on it. Then when I call you on it, you now say we can but that you haven't had a chance to clean the unit but that if we agree to clean it that we can move in early, now it has conditions. (It took 3 of us 5 hours to clean the refridgerator, tubs that were disgusting, the clogged drains, the oven, the microwave, the toilets, the grease staurated fans, shower tile, windows, etc.) Then it comes to the day before we are to move in and you haven't even offered or given us keys to do so. There is no office in the building that is manned by anyone so how am I to get them? I call you to get them. You say you will call me back on it but you don't. Its now the night before the morning we are to move in and I have not yet heard back from you on the several messages that I have left needing keys, garage remotes, etc. and say that I am paying movers $110.00 an hour starting early in the morning and I cannot have them just sitting around because I cannot move in. I finally get you at the apartment and you don't have keys. You have no idea where the keys are from the previous tenants which is kind of a problem. You say you will make copies of the one master you have in your office and leave them in the apartment for me, of course you don't. I call again and you finally do late that night, you leave 2 keys for 3 residents. I ask for those keys, a garage door opener, etc over the next week. I leave 4 voice -mails asking for keys, a punch -list, apartment problems such as stained rugs, broken screens, doors, etc. You never call back. I then see you the next week at the front of the building and you are on your cell phone. I patiently wait well you are on your call and you pause and say I will call you in a little while Tom and then you go back to your call. A week passes and again you never do. I send 2 emails to you and your corporate office and no one responds. I call your corporate office and leave a voice -mail but no one ever calls back. I call you again and your voice - mail is full so I text you. Again you never call back. Milissa calls you and you finally stop by one day when I am not home. She tells you are refrigerator leaks and that is kind of urgent as our kitchen floor is covered in water. She gives you a list of our other home issues along with my written name and phone # on the list and asks that you call me stating that I wanted to speak with you but weeks pass and you never call me. It's now been 2 months and you still have not called me! She calls you because I have given up on you. She speaks to you about a month ago and says we want a punch list to document things wrong with our apartment so it is noted and does not affect our deposit. You say well normally you just do a walk - through but that we moved in early so you wont be doing one. It doesn't matter when we moved in, that is irrelevant, the condition of the apartment is the condition of the apartment regardless of when we take occupancy. She calls you again a week and a half ago and you tell her you will come do a walk - through this last Saturday at l Oam. We wait for the appointment you set and of course you do not show OR even call. She leaves a massage and you don't even call her back until the next day. You say you forgot but that you would come today at 5pm. I leave work early to meet you and AGAIN you no show, no call and now it is 750pm and I have still not even heard from you! You are the most disrespectful, irresponsible person that I HAVE EVER MET! It is just plane rude what you have done to us. We are nice . people and do not deserve this unprofessional treatment from you or this outfit. This letter serves as legal documentation that you have not only refused to do repairs in our apartment but that we have also made not less than a dozen attempts to get a move -in punch -list or walk - through and because of your refusal to do so, that none of our security deposit will be affected by it. Enough is enough. Your lack of follow through, professionalism and respect will not constitute any forfeiture of our deposit as we have tried everything possible. City of Edina please note the following.- This building has no staff on -site that can be spoke to in any kind of office, The managers emails listed to contact do not even live or work here any more and no one responds to them. Marc the property manager addressed in this email (the other manager listed to contact in our lease) does not respond to calls, voice -mails or emails. This buildings corporate office is in a smoke shop and gas station in Bloomington and no one answers the door there, the phone when you call there or returns, voice -mails or emails when you leave or send them. There is no one to speak with here or anywhere about issues or problems (more: like when�our power has been, out). It has only been 2 months since we moved in here.and frankly, ,l am already sick of living here! Tom Stenvig cc in printed letters:_ Edina City Council, MN Tenants Union, Homeline MN (tenant advocacy group) and John Broeker (Attorney). We have asked also not less than than 10 times now to have our locks changed for security purposes but you . refuse to do it. There are keys floating around from previous tenants that you have no idea where they are and we have a 18 year; old daughter that is frightened by this and all of our lifelong possessions are in this home. Thanks for the. irresponsibility. Last, we pay.a lot more to live here than EVERY other apartmeni+we looked at. But we chose this one because it was Edina and .we had an, expectation that it would be better ran because of it, (held to higher standards thaa other cities) and worth the additional rent we pay. This place is a disgrace! 3 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:45 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Is Woodale a one way now? Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tim Robb fmailto:tgrobb @vahoo.coml Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 10:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Is Woodale a one way now? I recently drove Down Woodale ave between 50th and valley view and it looked like there are only two bike lanes and one car lane? Is this right? Are there really more bikes than cars in Edina? Sent from my iPhone F105 Thunderchief Susan Howl From: Marty Scheerer Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:35 AM To: 'mellum.julie @gmail.com'; Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: RE: Fire Danger Very High /bordering Explosive: BAN UNNECESSARY BURNING NOW Ms. Mellum, Good morning and thank you for the suggestion. The City of Edina has banned all recreational fires until further notice since last Thursday October 4`h. It has been posted on our website and the recreational fire hotline. This ban in Edina was prior to the DNR burning resections that were put in place for Hennepin County. Thank you Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief 952 - 826 -0332 1 Fax 952 -826 -0393 mscheerer(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Fire From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:29 AM To: Scott Neal; Marty Scheerer Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Fire Danger Very High /bordering Explosive: BAN UNNECESSARY BURNING NOW Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council member, Scott Neal and Marty Scheerer. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(cbEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Fan Doing Business From: Julie Mellum mailto :mellurnJulie(aDgmail.coml Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 7:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: DNR: Fire Danger Very High /bordering Explosive: BAN UNNECESSARY BURNING NOW Cear Edina Clerk: Please distribute this email to the Mayor, Scott Neal and City Council Members. Thank you. Dear Mayor Hovland, Scott Neal and Council Members, You are probably aware that the DNR has issued burning restrictions, yet word of it has not gotten out in Edina. Please see the attached memo below. There is currently a ban on campfires in Hennepin County. What better time could there be to request a complete ban until further notice, due to extremely dry conditions and extreme fire danger. This is an opportunity to educate the public and to alert the fire department and police department to 1 put out illegal fires when out on routine patrols. Please perhaps place a notice in the Sun - Current and placed in radio announcement that there is no burning until further notice. It is the right thing to do. Thank you, Julie Mellum From the Fire Department's Website: Minneapolis Fire Department Here are the general guidelines for the type of recreational fire you can have in Minneapolis: • A Permit is NOT required • Allowed only between 9am -10pm • Banned when wind gusts are greater than 10mph. • Banned when the state has issued Burning Restrictions. DNR News 10/05/2012: Restrictions on campfires and open burning in southeastern and central Minnesota take effect Sunday Full story 10/03/2012: Fire danger hits record high; public assistance needed Full story According to DNR FIre Danger Map -- Hennepin County is at very high danger and counties bordering are at the Extreme danger level: Very High Fires start very easily and spread at a very fast rate. Fires start easily from all causes, spread rapidly and intensify quickly. Spot fires are a constant danger. Fires burning in heavy fuels may quickly develop high- intensity characteristics, such as long - distance spotting and fire whirlwinds. Direct attack at the head of such fires is rarely possible after they have been burning more than a few minutes. Extreme: The fire situation is explosive and can result in extensive property damage. Fires under extreme conditions start quickly, spread furiously, and burn intensely. All fires are potentially serious. Development into high - intensity burning will usually be faster and occur from smaller fires than in the very high danger class (item 4). Direct attack is rarely possible, and may be dangerous, except immediately after ignition. Fires burning in heavy slash or in conifer stands may be unmanageable while the extreme burning condition lasts. Under these conditions, the only effective and safe control action is on the flanks until the weather changes or the fuel supply lessens. Susan Howl From: Gary & Gayle [mailtomIgiscrow(cDcomcast.netl Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:54 PM To: Edina Mail; Wayne Houle Subject: Additional Street Signs Monday, October 08, 2012 4201 Dunberry Ln. Edina, MNH 55435 Dear Mayor, Council Members, Mr: Houle, Yesterday was a beautiful fall day.. So — after witnessing the Colts defeat the Packers on TV, I decided some exercise was in order, and taking a walk should be my chosen method. I live, and have lived for some 39 years, in what is known as the Southdale Edition of the City. Consequently my neighborhood walks will generally take me North on Cornelia Dr. and around back toward home -- South on Southdale Rd. Today I encountered, for the first time, several strange signs painted on the roadways of both Cornelia and Southdale. The print part of the signage says BLVD which I interpret as an abbreviation meaning Boulevard, and the rest, a rather odd abstract rendering of a riderless bicycle. Now first here, does the City really have a right to change these street designations from Drive and Road respectively -- to being considered as Boulevards? And secondly, the meaning of these signs, as well as the need for these signs, not only escapes me ... but also escaped everyone else I talked with on my walk. And if the reason is to alert drivers to the possibility of bicycle riders on these streets, what about signs signaling the possible presence of persons who run, as well as walk dogs on these "BLVD "s. Why do these kinds of people not deserve to have similar signage? As bicycles have been used and allowed on these streets for as long as I can recall — why are these signs necessary now? What do they mean? Who are they for? What was the cost to the city (I. E. taxpayers) for this additional signage. Who ordered these signs, and who approved this expense? Thirdly, paraphrasing Council person Brindle's remarks regarding her "unhappiness at" not being informed of a prior activity by the traffic dept. (in that case I believe she was referring to the recent striping of Wooddale between V.V. and 501h St.), as a citizen I also like to exercise the right to say here — not only -- that these odd surprises that make sense to no one, are unwelcome. In ending, I submit that it would behoove everyone to consider the "SIGN POLLUTION" happening in our beautiful city. Area's are at risk of beginning to look not only silly, but tacky. Additionally, when /where there is excessive signage — few, if any, are as likely to be read and /or considered. That's a pretty well accepted little factoid of human psychology. Respectfully yours, Gayle L. Crow 952 - 920 -2554 Susan Howl Dear City Council, I am forwarding Bob Vogel's feedback on creating a photo database of CCD homes to use in the evaluation process at the HPB. As you know, I've proposed that the HPB use existing homes in Country Club as a guideline to evaluating remodels and new homes. My rationale is that we have numerous examples of what a "Country Club tudor" looks like rather than relying on generic, academic description from a book. I disagree with Mr. Vogel. How can a home be "visually compatible" if architectural style is not considered? As you saw when I shared the photo library with you during the appeal of 4524 Bruce, there are some strong stylistic similarities between the homes. The benefit of using existing homes as a reference point will give not only the board, but the builders as well , a concrete, visual reference of what will is visually compatible. Furthermore, it's been Mr Vogel who has encouraged the use of "contemporary materials" on new homes. That's why some have been approved. Shouldn't he be the one to protect the architectural standards? Mr Vogel has quite a broad interpretation of what is acceptable when not considering architectural style. Mr Vogel thought the home next to us was visually compatible with the neighboring houses.It was not. He thought the original house design at 4602 Bruce was compatible. It was not and was changed based on resident input. Most recently he thought the original home presented at 4524 Bruce was compatible. It also was not compatible. Luckily the neighbors disagreed and changes were made to all of these projects. Shouldn't the Heritage Preservation Board, and not the neighbors, be the one to raise these concerns? Had the Board utilized a more objective evaluation, these issues would have been addressed in the review process and would not have required appeal to the Council. It would also have saved the builder's time and money and seller's uncertainty. Let's reduce the "subjective" review of these projects and make it more objective. It is a win -win. I am recommending a change in the COA process to include architectural style to the evaluation. I am not optimistic that the Board will agree, but wanted to let you know my concerns. Kitty O'Dea From: Joyce Repya <JRepyaCa_�EdinaMN.gov> Subject: FW: Tudor style Date: October 8, 2012 11:45:24 AM CDT To: "Kitty O'Dea (kodea.mn(d)-gmail.com)" <kodea.mn(a-)_gmail.com> Hi Kitty- Attached you will find Robert Vogel's advice to the HPB on the concept of a photo inventory. Joyce Repya, Associate Planner 952- 826 -0462 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 JRepya(cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov/Plannin g ...For Living, Learning, Raising I anu ies ��c lloing Business From: Robert Vogel [ mailto :rcvogel(abspringgrove.coop1 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 5:05 PM To: Joyce Repya Subject: Tudor style Joyce: The architectural classification of houses is problematic for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, there is no standare classification system for American houses — architectural historians and preservationists are all over the map when it comes to how they classify historic houses. The National Register recommends A Field Guide to American Houses by Virginia & Lee McAlester, which is the resource we provide to members of the Heritage Preservation Board. The chapter on Tudor style houses is particularly applicable to the Country Club District. Most Country Club Tudors built between 1924 and 1944 are actually contractor versions of the basic suburban cottage prototype that was built throughout the United States —many architectural historians consider these houses to be vernacular houses rather than houses of style. Only a handful of homes in the Country Club were designed by architects as authentic specimens of the Tudor Revival style, reflecting a school of design theory and practice. The great majority of the houses are contractors' interpretations of standard plan houses that were designed for mass - production in suburban subdivisions, where the "Tudor" detailing was little more than a skin -deep embellishment of the basic, boxy two -story suburban cottage. Thank goodness, the Tudors make up roughly 40% of the historic homes in the district (roughly equal to the "Colonials" which reflect precisely the same mix & match design elements) and none of them qualify individually for landmark designation on the basis of their artistic value. For the sake of convenience, we have lumped all of the Tudor -like houses together whenever they exhibit steeply pitched gable roofs, decorative half- timbering, massive chimneys, or windows with multi - pane glazing, which the McAlesters consider "identifying features ". Some Tudor houses possess all of the identifying features, but many do not. The district plan of treatment encourages new construction (as well as remodeling on existing homes) to be visually compatible with the pattern of architectural features common to historic homes in the district. The emphasis is on size, form, proportions and massing, not architectural "style ". Design of new houses especially needs to consider the individuality and variation of features that occur in the historic homes. Some of these features (such as Tudor half - timbering and cut stone trim) commonly recur on houses throughout the district that were built during the period of significance. Then and now, much of this architectural embellishment was probably added merely as an afterthought, rather than fully integrated with the overall design (which is why the vast majority of the homes are properly treated as specimens of vernacular architecture). Which, I think, is the best rationale for not devoting a great deal of time and energy to inventing (or re- inventing) an elaborate architectural classification system based on "style" for houses in the district. We should continue to treat them as unstyled vernacular creations with wide variations in decorative detailing. It is fun to look at old houses and compare them to each other. We should encourage people to study them and record their appearance. Let folks argue over what's a Tudor and what's an English Cottage. But I think it would be a mistake for us to invent some kind of Country Club Tudor architectural template for design review purposes. There is no "perfect" Tudor against which we need to compare all others. Architecture (like history) is really quite messy. The houses in the district are important because they illustrate the developer's vision of a planned suburban neighborhood, not because they individually possess high architectural value or represent some kind of significant aesthetic achievement. Robert PATHFINDER CRM, LLC HISTORIANS, ARCHAEOLOGISTS, ARCHITECTS & PRESERVATION PLANNERS 1 18 EAST MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 503 SPRING GROVE, MINNESOTA 55974 (507) 498 -3810 (800) 206 -8704 TOLL FREE WWW.PATHFINDERCRM.COM Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail ,went: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:56 AM o: Wayne Houle; Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Street Striping Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnora2EdinaMN!M I www. Edina MN.aov �- ...For Livi.ng, Learning, Raising Fatuities &Doing i3tLSiness From: Mary Ratelle [mailto•mary ratelle(dhriskstrategies.com1 Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 8:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: City Street Striping I am very concerned about the poor planning and waste of taxpayer money used to stripe the streets of Edina for bike lanes. Valley view road north of Crosstown highway has car lanes that are not wide enough for the cars, so cars are either required to cross the double yellow lines into incoming traffic or the turn lanes or the cars are required to drive in the biking lanes. This is even more true on Wooddale road between Valley View and 50th, where you left off the yellow stripe in the middle, but the driving lane for two -way traffic is slightly wider than needed for 1 way traffic. I was driving on Wooddale this weekend and there were bikers and runners using the bike lane on the west side and two -way traffic trying to manage the driving lanes. I believe that the city has created more confusion for drivers and additional hazard for all citizens (drivers, pedestrians, and bikers) with the poorly planned street markings. How much wasted money has been spent on poor planning and striping of our streets? Mary P. Ratelle, FSA Health Risk Strategies, LLC 6804 Brittany Road Edina, MN 55435 direct (952) 920 -9700 fax (952) 920 -0494 mary .ratelle @hriskstrategies.com www.hriskstrategies.com PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This message and any attachments may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive for the recipient, you are notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply e- mail and delete the message and any attachments. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:45 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Minnehaha Woods street & sewer. project - Request for reimbursement of damages Lynette Biunno, Receptionist c �(E� i i'. `• 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 (�rW ��,t ` Ibiunnona.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov mot' ` For Living, Learning, Raising Families. Doing Business From: Mary Jean Weigel rmailto:mjw119Cd)gmail.comI Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 8:58 AM To: Edina Mail; Wayne Houle; tmuse sehinc.com Subject: Minnehaha Woods street & sewer project - Request for reimbursement of damages October 5, 2012 Dear Major, City Council, Wayne Houle and Toby Muse, After attending the October 2 Special Assessment Hearing for the street project known as Minnehaha Woods I am filing an objection. We have lived for 30 years in in our house on the SE corner of 55`h and Oaklawn Avenue. During those years we have had occasional water seepage' in the SE corner of our basement (the unfinished side.) which was easily contained. This included the 1987, 18 inch rain and 1991 flooding. Last year the new street and sewer project was completed in our neighborhood. To our surprise when the first heavy rain of spring came on May 3/4`h of this year our basement flooded. The seepage came from the west and north sides. These are the sides that parallel the new street construction. We pulled up the not very old carpet and waited. The next rain a few weeks later also seeped in immediately. I called Carter (project engineer). He explained that ground water had been diverted due to new storm sewer placement and private sewer lines replacement meant water that used to stay in the system were now just in the ground water. The diverted water is now flowing into my basement. Many of our neighbors have drain tile systems but we did not. We use our finished basement space and felt we could not ignore the new water problem so we were forced to install drain tile ($6,600) replace the carpet ($2800) and some wall board and paint was needed ($700). We do have sewer backup insurance but the seepage cannot be covered by our homeowners' insurance policy. So we were hit with a $10,000 surprise expense for a space that for the last 30 years had been dry before the new streets and sewers were installed. Was this a design flaw? What could be done in the future to alert home owners of this potential problem? Should the City pay for this unnecessary expense that I incurred? (not to mention the 3 months it took to put things back together) My across the street neighbor's and my father's sprinkler systems were repaired by the City. A Brookview homeowner had her retaining wall rebuilt 3 times to meet her satisfaction. (to name only a few of the project's damages fixed by the City already). With 30 years without our basement flooding, it is clear that our damage was also directly caused by the project and we should be reimbursed accordingly. We hereby make it request. Sincerely, Richard and Mary Jean Weigel 5501 Oaklawn Avenue 952 - 920 -2151 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:59 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Praise for Do -Town Lynette Biunno, Receptionist i V " 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno aOEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families �& t Doittg Business From: Darren Wennen [ mailto:DWennen(olsterilmed.coml Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 8:35 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: flyn n Caddo- town.org Subject: Praise for Do -Town Mayor Hovland, I have recently had the opportunity to engage with Flynn Rico - Johnson, a representative from the Do -Town organization relating to an attempt by local parents to improve the school lunch program in the Edina School District. Flynn and the Do -Town staff have been extremely knowledgeable and professional in assisting our endeavor, and as I learn more about what they are doing in the community, I applaud not only their efforts, but the city government for supporting this organization as well. I believe that government should be pushed down to the lowest level possible. I appreciate the fact that Edina is taking the initiative to improve community service and support at a level that Do -Town operates at (directly with the city and county management). I firmly believe that their continued efforts will lead to a more vibrant and healthy community. Thanks for supporting this effort. Best regards, Darren Wennen 5525 Oaklawn Ave Edina, MN 55424 952 - 221 -5478 dwennen(a)sterilmed.com 1 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 4:12 PM Subject: FW: Wood Smoke This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and all member of the City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant rrf (`i `5 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 �s.J ekastnerna EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Livin;;, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jane Levin ,[mailto:jjkiwi(5)gmail.com1 Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 3:54 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Wood Smoke. To the attention of Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: I have lived in Edina for 19.years and love this city. However, the proliferation of chiminea has made living here in the summer untenable. Several nights a week, we suddenly smell the wood smoke and go running around the house closing all the windows and doors. When it is a cool evening, we are closed in. When it is warm, we cannot use fans, but have to use air conditioning. If we are out for the evening and come home to a house filled with wood smoke, we start coughing and our eyes tear. Why should we be exposed to second -hand smoke, a health risk? Why should we have to close up our home so that others can sit in front of a wood fire? Please, please ban all outdoor burning in the City of Edina. Thank you. Jane Levin 4235 Alden Dr. Edina 55416 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail .Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 12:16' PM Subject: FW: Stop sign at 61 st & Kellogg This message has also been forwarded to the Mayor and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax:952- 826 -0389 ekastner @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Angie Porter f mailto':crowleyporter@kmail.coml ,. Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:18 AM To: btheis@edina- ov Edina Mail; ionibennett12@comcast.net; Mary Brindle; loshspra>;ue @edinarealty.com; swensonanniOgmail . com Subject: Stop sign at 61st & Kellogg I am emailing to express my support for stop signs at the intersection of 61st & Kellogg in Edina. Currently, there are yield signs, and I believe they are actually dangerous. In conversations with neighbors, I have heard of issues and accidents, and it seems that stop signs would be an effective and appropriate solution. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my email. ,Angie Porter 5905 Fairfax Ave Edina 55424 1 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:05 AM Subject: FW: Biking on sidewalks in Edina This message has also been forwarded to the Mayor. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952 - 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastner @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: tpaulsonL@1992ventures.com [mailto:tpaulson 1992ventures.comI Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:08 AM To: Edina Mail; ionibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; loshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl@gmail.com Cc: Jeff Long Subject: Biking on sidewalks in Edina Dear City Council Members: I am writing today with regard to the City ordinance that prohibits riding a bicycle on the sidewalk. It is my understanding that City Council is considering an amendment to the City Code that would allow biking on sidewalks and I support such an amendment. I encourage any Council member who would oppose such an amendment to go to Concord Elementary School at 3:05pm today as it is walk /ride to school day and hundreds of kids have ridden their bikes to school. If you oppose such an amendment, please tell the kids (and adults) riding on the sidewalks that they are in violation of City Code and that they need to be riding on the streets. Please also tell them why you are opposed to them riding their bicycles on the sidewalks. Respectfully, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:51 AM Subject: FW: TLC bike lanes on Wooddale Ave.. This message has also been forwarded to the Mayor. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952 - 826 -0342 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 ekastner @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: tpaulson 1992ventures.com f mailto :tpaulson @1992ventures.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:48 AM To: Edina Mail ionibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; loshspra�ue @edinarealtv.com; swensonannl @�mail.com Subject: TL "b,ike lanes on Wooddale Ave. Dear City Council Members: I am writing today with regard to the recently painted bike lanes on Wooddale Ave. As I recall from the discussion leading to the vote to approve the bike lanes, both the City Council and the Transportation Commission said it was incumbent upon those two groups to educate the public on how to.use the new roadways. And yet, at.the October 2nd City Council meeting you were still discussing how to educate the public - after the lanes were painted! In my opinion, this "education" should have come before, or simultaneous to, the road being painted = not`after. Which group has failed it's residents here: City Council or the Transportation Commission? Also; today is walk /ride to school day for Concord Elementary School and a popular route to school.is Wooddale Ave. I have children at Concord so I was on Wooddale Ave. six different times between 54th Street and 59th Street from 7:30am to 9:30am. today. Along that route I did not see a single sign directing traffic patterns nor. did I see a single Council member or a single Transportation Commission member educating the public. However, the street sweeper was sweeping up and down�Wooddale which added to the clanger-arid confusion of the roadway. Could the City:have coordianted with "Concord to avoid sweeping Wooddale during school commuting hours on walk /ride to school day? I was dissappointed when the bike lanes were approved; but even more dissappointed at how they have been rolled- out. Respectfully, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue 1 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:07 AM Subject: FW: Bike Lanes on Woodale and 54th This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952 - 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastner @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bob Aderhold imailto:bobader @comcast.netl Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 11:11 PM To: Edina Mail; ionibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshsprague @edinarealty.com; swnsonannl @gmail.com Subject: Bike Lanes on Woodale and 54th Dear Mayor and Council Members: I want to let you know that I appreciate the work that the City has done on this project and your willingness to be a little out there on the cutting edge. I live at 3529 West 54th Street and drive and bike on the roadways affected. I must say that, as a driver, it took me a little while to understand how the advisory lanes work. However, now that I've gotten to know them, I'm starting to understand and appreciate them. As you know, the lanes let drivers know that cyclists also are users of the road and may be present and, therefore, that they should proceed cautiously. The solid lines make clear that certain portions of the road are intended for parking - this is a good thing too. I also think that the striping makes the road feel narrower and, therefore, less like the freeway feel that one gets on relatively wide roads. My hope is that it changes actual behavior. The new roundabouts in the blocks adjacent to my house have the same effect. I'm all in favor of street treatments that slow down traffic on residential streets - especially the one my family lives on where the street is fairly wide. One concern I have is that, when cars are parked close to the roundabouts, it can be challenging for cars passing through. I'm not sure if anything can be done about that. But I think it would be something for the engineers to give some thought. Thank you for everything you do on our behalf! Regards, Robert Aderhold 3529 West 54th Street Edina, 55410 Susan Howl 9/30/2012 To Whom It May Concern, My name is Anna Berg and I'm writing in support of the Lake Edina Park Path and Playground. I would like this idea soundly placed in the city's 2013 -2017 capital improvement budget. I am currently the Community Manager at Edina Park Apartments, a community of 79 apartments and a home for many children. Lake Edina Park is located across the road from one of my buildings off of Parklawn Court and in close proximity to the other three buildings making up Edina Park Apartments. I personally have no children of my own, but being the Community Manager here am involved in the safety and well being of the children in this community. Currently there is no space for the kids to safely play, walk, or bike. I find myself constantly reminding them to stay out of the parking lots and roads for safety reasons, and to be careful in the small grassy areas available due to the close proximity to the apartments, windows, patio doors etc. when they are playing soccer, baseball, or football. Though Centennial Lakes is nearby, it is unrealistic and unsafe for the children to walk up there and cross France Avenue. Additionally, there are very few kid activities there, especially if the children's parents aren't able to attend with them. As an apartment manager I am also having trouble keeping the kids out of the hallways. Because there is no safe place for them to gather, they are constantly kicking balls in the hallways, knocking on doors, and trying to find things to entertain themselves. Growing up, I was blessed with a large backyard and a place to run and play. Not only would these sidewalks and a park provide a place for children it would provide an outlet for them to exercise and socialize. The benefits of a park in this area would highly outweigh any negatives that may surface throughout this process. This would be the perfect area to put in a Playground and Sidewalk simply for the fact that there is such a concentrated population in this area. Majority, if not all, of Parklawn Avenue is apartment buildings housing many children and families. I have heard many voices in support of this initiative and hope that it is considered very seriously, and eventually approved. I would like to see the many kids growing up in apartments be able to have a place to walk safely to school with their friends, as well as a place to run around and socialize. Thank you for your consideration, time, and attention to this matter. I am excited to be involved and become a strong voice in support for Edina Park Apartments. Thank you, Anna Berg Community Manager Edina .Park Apartments Vice: ice: 952- 83.1 - .19.11 Fax: 952- 831 -1157 rnanager370 ),edinapark.corn Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:24 AM Subject: FW: Edina Bonfires This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant .41''ti`- 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 yV ekastneKaDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov '=" ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: O'Meara, Patrick [ mailto : patrick— o'meara @irco.com] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:06 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina Bonfires Mayor Hovland, Good morning. I wanted to get your perspective on the recent activity to outlaw outdoor fires in Edina. My wife and I recently installed a stone patio and fireplace in our backyard and cannot begin to tell you how much enjoyment we have received. Our children actually turn off the TV and spend time with us in front of the fire — amazing! We host our neighbors on a regular basis and it has provided the perfect gathering spot for friends and family. I was very concerned to see that a group wants to take away our freedom to have outdoor fires. It seems like each year more and more legislation is passed that hinders the American citizen's ability to make decisions for ourselves. I never thought a wood fire could be the target of a similar campaign. I know you have far greater issues to deal with than 'roasting marshmallows' but would certainly appreciate your feedback on this situation. I hope our recent investment in the home is not rendered useless by this effort. We moved to Edina 4 years ago and cannot think of a greater community that we have ever lived in. You and your staff have done a wonderful job. Best regards, Patrick O'Meara The information contained in this rnessage is priviieged and intended only for the recipients named. If the seeder is not a repre:enlative of the inll?nded recipient, arly reVifhll, itiSS ITIInation or copying of this message or the irlforrmatlDn it contains Is prohibited If yoU have Ieceived this message In orrof, pli,ase IIYIr1)ediF)tel }' notify the 5•: n 1r r. and deleeie the original rnessage and attachinents ...... Susan Howl From: info @minnesotagoplan.org Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:09 AM To: info @minnesotagoplan.org Subject: Adopted: Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan Transportation Stakeholders, MnDOT is�pleased to announce the adoption of the Statewide Multimodal - Transportation Plan 2012- 2031. The updated plan is;the result of extensive collaboration between -MnDOT, partners, citizens, and stakeholders like you. Thank „you for engaging in the process to craft a plan reflective of statewide interests. The adopted Plan can be found on the project website at: http://www.miiinesotapoplan.org/d6cs.html. The Statewide Multimodal'Transportation Plan will be used, to shape subsequent MnDOT plans and investment decisions while serving' as a framework moving forward. It will serve as the foundation for MnDOT modal investment plans. MnDOT.is currently in the process of updating the 20 -year State Highway Investment Plan. To become involved in this process; please visit the project website at http: / /www dot state inn us/ planning /statehiphwayinvestmentplan /index.html or sign -up to receive periodic project updates by clicking here. We look forward to future partnering opportunities to advance Minnesota's multimodal transportation system. Thank you, Kirby Becker MnDOT Office of Statewide Multimodal Planning 1 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:05 AM Subject: FW: Bicycle Lanes This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastnerCa�EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov :k ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: r sheridanC&comcast.net [mailto:r sheridan @comcast.netl Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Bicycle Lanes Mayor Hovland, write tonight to strongly object to the new bike lanes on Wooddale and Valley View Road. I live at 6332 Millers Lane, just south of the Valley View and Wooddale intersection. When will the City of Edina stand up to the bicycle community? I am an Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, and part of my job is representation of the County Public Works Department in the acquisition of property for road projects, so I have some understanding of road design and function. These roads, in their current width, were not designed for bike lanes and cars, they were designed for cars, period. Trying to wedge these bike lanes onto this right of way is dangerous to both the bicycles and motor vehicles. I grew up in the house I am living in. When we were kids, we biked all over Edina and beyond. We would routinely bike to Braemar and to the City lakes. We did not need any bike lanes. We avoided Wooddale like the plague, we took side streets!! What a concept. Simply put, these bike lanes represent the catering to a small group and are only useable part of the year. Finally, let me share a story of bike community influence. The new Lowry Avenue bridge was designed with a separate bike and pedestrian lane on each side of the bridge, separated from the vehicle lanes by physical barriers. This was not enough for the bikers. After the design had been approved and was too far along to change, they insisted on, and got, bike lanes added to the main vehicle traffic lanes on the bridge which required modifications to how the bridge was constructed. This is absurd! The bike lanes on Wooddale and Valley View are equally absurd. I urge you and the council to reverse this horrible decision. Respectfully, Rick Sheridan P.S. I am supporting you for Mayor. Good luck!! Services lull M Commuter Services — A program of the I -494 Corridor Commission 2012 annual Report Summary at 9 Months na = Not Assigned Goal Result Employers/Multi-Tenant Properties Commuter fairs with employers and multi- 140 149 tenant properties Meetings with employers and property na 80 managers about promoting commute options Travel Demand Management Plans na 12 (Normandale Community College, Polar Semiconductor, Windsor Plaza, United Health Group, Fingerhut/Bluestem Brands, Syngenta Seeds, Lifetouch, One Southwest Crossing, Master.Technology Group, Prairie Oaks Corporate Center, Golden Triangle Tech Center, Phillips & Temro Industries) Commute Benefit Coordinators at large 400 728 companies Manage Preferential Carpool Parking for 16 American Medical Systems, ATK, Best Buy, Employers Crescent Ridge, Cargill, Emerson, Express Scripts, Mammoth- WEBCO, Medica, Normandale Community College, One Liberty Corporate Center, Starkey, Supervalu, UnitedHealth Group, US Bank, Windsor Plaza Employer Displays with bus schedules, na 185 rideshare and bicycle commuting information to employers Commuter New carpoolers 225 529 New vanpoolers 10 51 New transit riders 200 1,750 New bicycle commuters 300 410 New teleworkers 100 750 Total Single Occupant Vehicle 19000 35,490 Conversions r�1 M�] a Results from 2012 Commuter Challenge Over 17,000 people made a pledge to use an alternative mode this year, up from 15,000 people last year, making it the biggest campaign yet! 97% of drive alones said they fulfilled their pledge to ... carpool, bike, take the bus or train, walk, etc... 89% of the drive alones said they are more frequently choosing to use alternative modes for transportation 26% of the drive alones said they converted to using an alternative EVERY DAY = 4,420 people! 36% of pledgers were male 64% of pledgers were female 79% of pledgers say employer sponsored transportation benefits would be a major influence on their decision to change their commuting behavior Walk_ 8% Vanpool 2% Pledges by Mode Other 2% ight Rail 9% Northstar 1% ® Bus: 538 u Light Rail: 365 Northstar: 62 Bike: 1,008 Carpool: 1,120 Vanpool: 95 Walk: 350 Telework: 603 Other: 82 To: Mayor and Council Members From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: October 16, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS Action Requested: None. l�roRPORAT�� 7888 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑X Information / Background: Attached are letters and a -mails received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan Howl. From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday,. October 16, 2012 11:13 AM To: Ann Braden; Courtney Whited; 'Jennifer Janovy'; 'Michael Thompson'; Nathan Franzen; 'Paul Nelson'; Steven Schweiger; Surya lyer; Tom LaForce Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Council and Edina Transportation Commission - in support of Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r 1.952- 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(,EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov k 1 or Li�1ng, Learning, Raising Families �Sz Doing Business From: Kate Khaled fmailto:kate.downing @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:06 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: City°Council and Edina Transportation. Commission - in support of Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund To Whom It.May Concern, My name is Kate Downing Khaled and I live at 6713 Southdale Road. I, along with my husband and our two young sons, recently moved back to Edina in August 2012 (my husband grew up in Edina, and we are very glad to have come back'home'). Our neighborhood is ideal: we are close to shopping, groceries, parks, highways and one of the best school systems in the state. For all these reasons, we couldn't be happier. But one part of Edina life concerns me: this is not a walkable or bikeable city. Each day, I see our very elderly neighbor head out for his walk. Each time I see him walking in the middle 'of'the street (there are no sidewalks here) I cringe. I worry about the numerous young families who live in our neighborhood who have no dedicated space to walk their dogs or push their strollers. I wish I could feel confident allowing my children to bike to the park or to Cornelia elementary. Our streets need to be safer and healthier. As they stand now, they are one of the only major hindrances to Edina community life. Luckily you have an innovative and easy choice in front of you. Please support the pedestrian and bicycle improvement fund. It's a low - impact and forward thinking solution to what our community desperately needs for it's future health and vitality. lam grateful to the Commission and the Council for considering this letter, and I thank you for your continued commitment to creating a healthier community by making neighborhoods more walkable and bikeable. Sincerely, Katherine Downing Khaled, MPH 612.607.4743 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 9:25 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: New bike lanes ;:.. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 :.` Ibiunno(a-EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.pov `J =r' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Marcia /John Jones [mailto:M jones3(&comcast.netl Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 4:36 PM To: Edina Mail _ Subject: New bike lanes Dear Mayor Hovland, Having just returned from a bike and barge tour in southern France, I read with interest the controversy that has arisen over the new bike lanes on Wooddale Avenue. Having ridden for one week along the margins of busy roads in a foreign country and through the heart of traffic clogged French towns and cities, I decided today to do a couple errands on my bike. I biked to the post office and then to the library. Knowing that drivers might be looking for bikers, Wooddale Avenue was the easiest part. I only wish that 50th Street offered the same ... it's quite a puzzle to decide how to bike safely to the heart of our town. encourage you not to despair so quickly. I think drivers will soon become accustomed to the bike lanes and how to drive the street. They will soon be happy to have one less car in their way. Sincerely, Marcia Jones 4709 W. 44th Street Edina 55424 952 - 922 -2502 1 J Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:08 AM To: Wayne Houle; Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: roads and bike lanes Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal, Jeff Long and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist T- el F�11 °.' 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 k fh f "I IbiunnoCa?EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Busine, From: RICHARD YOUNG rmailto:richardyoung1145 msn.coml Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 7:43 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: roads and bike lanes Please route to the mayor and city council. Besides not liking the idea, I have a few things to discuss. First: I would like to know what the intersection of 70th St and HW100 is going to look like. Approaching from west on 70th at the first stop light it is already a difficult turn and playing around with an addition lane is going to be a nightmare. Second, in reading the article in the Sun the police mentioned about starting to enforce the new lane structure. As these lanes are a.two year experiment perhaps the police could just give out non -fee citations and track the occurances. If you think people are upset now, wait until you start handing out tickets for lane infractions on roads where there is miniscule bike traffic. If an accident is involved then proceed as usual. Third: what criteria / data will be collected to determine if the lanes stay or not? For that matter what is the base line for comparison? Fourth: putting paint on a road does not make it change peoples driving habits. People know how to drive on roads ; roads that are susposed to be straight and in some instances MIDDLE lines are required. These lines are to assist drivers in high traffic roads (the side roads in Edina are driven daily with minimum issue). By now having roads with painted lines which no longer show the middle one must ask are we really.helping our driveres or just making life (driving ) more difficult. Another point: these roads are used by non- residents. How are we going to TRAIN them. Richard Young 5804.Brook DR Edina .J Susan Howl Subject: Advisory Bike Lanes on Wooddale Ave Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council Members and others it may concern, I'm writing to express my concern about the recent addition of the advisory bike lanes on Wooddale Avenue. I can understand how a city- approved construction funded by Bike Walk Twin Cities is an enticing idea to bike enthusiasts, but to local residents such as myself, the new bike lanes pose a threat to the safety and to the peace - of -mind of drivers and bikers alike. I was extremely nervous the first time I drove on the newly painted pavement, and was convinced there would be further construction, or at the very least there would be an addition of the standard yellow dashed markings down the middle of the road. After driving Wooddale Ave with two other people (both just as confused and nervous as I was- one almost ran a stop sign while trying to figure out what was going on), and after reading the "Bike Lanes" article in the Edina Sun Current, I began to understand how to maneuver down Wooddale. However, I am no more comforted by this realization than when I thought I was driving in a construction zone. My attitude toward the recent addition of bike lanes is partly due to the fact that I don't think there was adequate communication and education regarding this unexpected change, and partly due to my belief that it is not safe nor sensible to cram two bike lanes, two car lanes, and a parking lane on a street that doesn't seem to have reasonable space for all of them. I don't think swerving over imaginary yellow double lines to accommodate bikers is a sound approach to including them in the next generation of transit goers. After speaking with friends and family, we agree that we do not feel comfortable driving on Wooddale Ave. I am personally worried that I may get in an accident with a bike or other vehicle while trying to drive along this road. The no fault law doesn't placate my worry, since serious injury to myself or others is a realistic concern. I fear how others, who are unfamiliar with the area, will react in a dangerous, spontaneous situation. My resolution is to return the street to motor vehicles, and to expand sidewalks to accommodate both pedestrians and cyclists. Or at the very least, to ensure separate spaces for motor vehicles and bicyclists. I sincerely appreciate any advice or other response you may have to my grievance. SARA BUCHANAN 4616 Casco Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:34 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: 'Minnehaha Woods Street Construction Timeline Attachments: Minnehaha Woods Timeline.pdf '.. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist JB PVC} 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno( EdinaMN.aov'I www.EdinaMN.gov For hiving, Le arning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Andrew Brown rmailto: and rew. r. brown Q&att. net'l Sent: Saturday, October.13, 2012 6:17 PM To ion ibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshspragueCdiedinarealty com; swensonanniC�gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott Neal; John Wallin; Wayne Houle;;:jimCajimgrotz:com ,CrabtreejrCabaol.com; cathats @comcast.net . mark.swenson @esgarch.com; Iarry.lomax(&gmail.com; jjkminn aol.com; Edina Mail Subject: Minnehaha Woods Street Construction Timeline The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor Members of the Edina City Council City Manager Scott Neal City Finance Director John Wallin City Engineer Wayne Houle My name is Andy Brown and I am a homeowner at 5512 Park Place in the Minnehaha Woods neighborhood. Attached is a time line spreadsheet along with backup regarding what the neighborhood knew and when. In my case I would have taken the $1,400 charge provided by Palda as most cure in place type 1 charges were ranging in the $3,300 range. This would have saved me $1,900, this combined with the engineering cost differential between SEH,and internal Edina Engineering Staff labor of $1,500 per house means that I potential could have saved $3,400. In total,. I spent $13,600 when I could have spent $10,200 on this project. am very upset that I was never informed about the Palda bid at $1,400 and I also am very upset other neighborhoods received cheaper engineering charges no matter what type of work was done. The $3,400 1 could have saved is over 3 /5th's my annual property tax. request that the City more equitably allocate the engineering, cost that Minnehaha Woods incurred through no fault of its own and that the City claws back certain monies to offset the neighborhood's inability to utilize the ' Palda bid at $1,400. SEH's zero communication on the bid is at the very least professional negligence and should be cause for concern on any other City of Edina contract. Thank.you Andy Brown 5512 Park Place Edina MN 55424 612- 220 -3045 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:41 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction Public Hearing Attachments: 2nd City Council Letter.pdf - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Oi 1t 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.00v I www.EdinaMN.gov = ...For Living, Learning, *, Raising Families & Doing Business From: jjkminn(&aol.com [mailto jjkminn(abaol.coml Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 7:09 AM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; ioshsprague(Qbedinarealty.com; ion ibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; Scott Neal; Wayne Houle; John Wallin; andrew.r.brown @att.net; jim0jimgrotz.com; larry.lomax(�gmail.com; pauMmwdevelopmentllc.com; mark.swenson(&esgarch.com; ejmcgarry(&comcast.net Subject: Minnehaha Woods Street ReConstruction Public Hearing The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor Members of the Edina City Council City Manager Scott Neal City Finance Director John Wallin Director of Public Works and City Engineer Wayne Houle Ladies and Gentlemen: Attached is some additional information to the Public Hearing on the Minnehaha Woods Special Assessment. My understanding is that the Public Hearing was closed and probably will not be open. Even if it was re- opened, I'm traveling this week and could not attend. Therefor, I'm transmitting this information in response to Council Member Swenson's invitation to continue to provide information. I think the issues that have been raised by me and others raise substantial questions about the private sanitary sewer service pipe reconstruction that have cost Minnehaha Wood's residents hundreds of thousands of dollars. Given that each resident's 3 minutes of speaking time is hardly sufficient to fully discuss the issues and has heightened the frustation level of me and many other residents, is there some other process available. Perhaps a publicly noticed meeting among the residents, representatives of the City Council, the City engineering staff and SEH. Thank you for your consideration. Jerry Kearney. cell: 612 -- 916 -7730 The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor Members of the Edina City Council City Manager Scott Neal' City Finance Director John Wallin City Engineer Wayne Houle My name is Jeremiah Kearney. My wife Pam and I have lived at 5420 Woodcrest Drive since 1988. lam writing to follow -up my written and oral presentation to the City Council on October 2,2012. In reviewing the video of that meeting and additional information, I have the following additional questions and comments to -my issues: I . Allocation of: Engineering Costs. While Director Houle explained that the Minnehaha Woods percentage of Total: Engineering Costs to Total Project Costs of :approximately 20 % was the norm, he'did not explain why Golf Terrace and Carson's Hill were so far below.the norm at 8 % and 7.1% respectively. Nor did he explain why Edina allocated more of its engineering staff time to Golf Terrace and Carson's Hill than to Minnehaha Woods. In fact, Director.Houle's comment that Edina essentially undercharged for its engineering services exacerbates my expressed concern that Edina failed to allocate its staff resources to benefit all taxpayers in order to avoid one neighborhood subsidizing (by having to pay third party engineering costs) the reconstruction costs of other neighborhoods (that received the, lower cost Edina engineering department services). To economically balance that mis- allocation we respectfully request that Edina consider reducing our special assessment by at least $1,500. This could be done by decreasing the percentage of engineering costs allocated to the street reconstruction and increasing the percentage allocated to the storm and sewer utilities fund. 2. Private Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction and Assessment. In his discussion with Mr. Pasco of SEH, Mayor Hovland crystallized the issue by asking the question "where could . we have saved the homeowners some money" and then answering his own question by stating that "we didn't do it ". The further question is whether anyone is going to be held accountable for that failure? The Minnehaha.Woods residents have unnecessarily spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (several thousand of dollars per REU) on their private sanitary sewer service pipe reconstruction. By way of contrast and as an illustration of the City Council's willingness to save homeowners Money on special assessments, the City Council, in response to Richmond Hills residents' Vociferous complaints about its proposed reconstruction project, amended the City's Special Assessment Policy in August, ,2012. The identified cost saving was approximately $730 per $10,0.00. assessment. Each Minnehaha Woods' homeowner has incurred unnecessary costs that are several times that savings in connection with the reconstruction of their private sanitary sewer service pipes. The facts,are clear: A. The City., in consultation with SEH prepared, and distributed to the Minnehaha Woods residents, a cost estimate of $4,500 for Segment C (from trunk line to ROW) that appears to have been incorrectly calculated because it was not based on the methodology that the City .would use to calculate the final cost. That final cost methodology calculates a single special assessment base on both the cost per Type .1 or Type 2 of reconstruction and the ratio of Type 1 or Type 2 residents ultimately using the City contractor. In his September 29, 2012 email explaining to Council Member Sprague why the final cost was lower than the estimated cost, Director Houle provided the following figures for the initial estimate: SEH ITEM TYPE EST REU' EST COST TOTAL COST 74 Type 1 -Open Cut 73 $2600 $189,800 75 Type 1 -CIPP 26 $4000 $104,000 76 Type 2 -CIPP 23 $4500 0 5 0 TOTALS 122 $397,300 ESTIMATED REU COST: $397,300/122= $3,257 It appears that the disclosed estimated cost was the highest estimated cost and not a blended estimated cost based on the City's and SEH's stated assumptions as to the ratio of Type 1 or 2 that would use the City's contractor. Taken from SEH's Bid Tabulation- 73/122 =the 59.8% described in Director's Houle's 9/29/12 email to Council Member Sprague and cc'd to Mayor Hovland, other Council Members and City Manager Neal Taken from Director's Houle's 9/29/12 email B. Neither the City nor SEH disclosed the assumptions and variables underlying the estimated cost. No written communication from the City or SEH explained that the estimate was based on assumptions as to the number of Type 1 -Open Cut, Type 1 -CIPP and Type 2 -CIPP residents who would elect to use the City contractor and the cost of each Type. Thus, residents did not have the proper information on which to evaluate the disclosed estimated cost. C. The City and SEH established a May 15, 2011 deadline for completion of the Stage 1 private sanitary sewer service pipes that was not synchronized with the March and April contract bidding and awarding process that was concurrently running with the private reconstruction process. This made it impossible for Stage 1 residents to have current cost information prior to making a decision whether to engage their own private contractors or to use the City's contractor. A fair reading of the City's and SEH's communications to residents in the February to April, 2011 period shows that the City and SEH repeatedly emphasized the need to complete the private work by May 15, 2011 in order to make sure that homeowners would not be working in the ROW when Palda was on site. Not once did the City or SEH tell the homeowners that it might be in their interest to wait until more accurate and updated estimates could be provided once the construction bids were received and evaluated and the contract was awarded. In effect, the disclosed erroneous original cost estimate established an inaccurately high ceiling for the private work being negotiated by homeowners for completion in February and March and probably into the early summer. The inaccurately high ceiling further substantially increased the amount of unnecessary costs paid by homeowners because it was also used for negotiating the costs for Segment D, the privately owned portion of the sanitary sewer service pipe from the ROW to the house. D. By March 22, 2011, the City and SEH knew that the original cost estimate was inflated. SEH's bid tabulation provided the following information Unit Total Palda Price Price Est Cost Item 74: 73 Sanitary Service Type. 1 -Open Cut $1,472 $107,456 Item 75: 26 Sanitary Service Type1 -CIPP $4,000 $104,000 Item 76: 2-3-Sanitary Service Type 2 -CIPP $4,100 1-24-30 122 REUs $305,756 $2,506 . Northwest Asphalt Item 7-4:_.73 Sanitary Service Type'1 -Open Cut $ 875 $ 63,875 Item 75: 26 Sanitary Service Type1 -CIPP $6,732 $175,032 Item 76: ZA Sanitary Service Type 2 -CIPP $7,242 $ 66 122 REUs $405,473 $3,324 Minger Construction Item 74: 73 Sanitary Service Type 1 -Open Cut $ 415 $ 30,295 Item 75: 26 Sanitary Service Type1 -CIPP $2,990 $ 77,740 Item 76. 23 Sanitary Service Type 2 -CIPP $3,395 $ 78.085 122 REUs $186,120 $1,526 When the City Council. awarded the contract to Palda on April 5, 2011, the City and SEH knew, or should have known, that the updated estimated cost exceeded the original estimated cost by $1,994, based on. the City's and SEH's assumptions as to the ratio of Type 1 -Open Cut, Type 1 -CIPP and Type 2 -CIPP that would use the City's contractor. Notwithstanding this knowledge, the City's and SEH's April 22, 2011 update to the Minnehaha Woods' residents did not inform the residents (such information would now be too late for Stage. 1 residents because of the looming May 15, 2011 completion date) of the reduced estimated costs, but again emphasized the May 15' and July 15. deadlines for private sanitary sewer service' pipe reconstruction. By way of contrast, the City and SEH sent a letter dated April 5, 2012 to the Richmond Hills residents notifying them of the contract award to Palda and stating that: The final assessment cost will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing tentatively scheduled for the fall of 2013. However, the bid does reflect a '38% reduction in 1 the combined street and sanitary sewer service special assessment, which we are anticipating'to be approximately $13,000. The original estimated cost was $16,800. Neither the City nor SEH disclosed the new estimated cost for the private sanitary sewer service pipe reconstruction. In summary, the City and SEH failed to establish a procedure that would provide the Minnehaha Woods residents with the information necessary to allow them to make an informed economic decision' about whether to privately reconstruct their Segment C pipes, or use the City's contractor. In addition to following a flawed procedure, the City and SEH appear to have provided an inaccurate original estimated cost because it was not calculated in accordance with the methodology that would be used in calculating the final cost and then failed to update the estimated cost after the contract was awarded. To put it bluntly, I was sandbagged. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the City find a way to compensate the Minnehaha Woods residents for their payment of thousands of dollars of unnecessary costs. This would require not only some reduction in the private sanitary sewer service pipe assessment but also some relief to 3 l the residents who paid their private contractors and did not apply to be specially assessed for that amount. Thank you for your consideration. Jerry Kearney 952 - 925 -3071 do-.. to'wn BLOOMINGTON E0114A RICHFIELD Dear Commissioner and Council My name is Doug Grennan. Our Family consists of 6 members. Kids ages: Twins °at 6 yrs , daughter 4 and infant 6 months old. We live at 6101 Halifax ave. We moved here 2 years ago because my wife and I wanted. our children to be raised in the best community and education system in the Twin Cities. After moving here we were thrilled to learn of the quality of people and age of families that live in our neighborhood. However: we were surprised,to find throughout.the city the sheer lake of pedestrian /bike friendly route.access,offered here. Its counter intuitive to us that such a family friendly and.generally healthy /safety_ conscience community would lack such access infrastructure to support such quality of life. priorities. Of course, we recognize that pedestrian/ bike infrastructure is not free. We also recognize that successful implementation of these routes would, require many individual concessions by homeowners around the community for the greater good of the community. My wife and I are here to do our part in both financial support and access support. We do not have a sidewalk on our street. We would welcome one. As a family, we often ride bikes in our neighborhood and walk to our local Pamela Park. It would be our hope our children could one day walk safely to their school at Normandale. It would also be our hope that we could ride our bikes on safe trails /routes in Edina that connect directly to the CLR /other systems tor be able to ride recreationally on the multitude of bike routes the Twin Cities has to offer or, for myself, ride to work Downtown. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund is a fantastic start to spur on the improvements needed in our community. The amount asked for on a monthly basis is very minimal even in these economic challenging times by virtually everyone in the community. The idea of spreading out the collections to the whole community as well as spreading the cost overtime makes the fund that much more embraceable. The risk of course is the creation of a fund that could get dumped into general expenditure needs for the city at a later. time. Hopefully there is a substantial lock box around the purpose of these funds, My Family and I support strongly the.creation of this fund. and thank the Commission and the-Council for their' commitment to create a more pedestrian /bike friendly community making it safer, healthier, enjoyable and accessible to all in our family friendly community of Edina. Sincerely, The Grennan's : Doug, Karel, Stella, Everett, Lucy, Elise Edina City Council October 15, 2012 Greetings good people of the Edina City Council and Transportation Commission, I am a long -time Edina resident. I grew up in Edina, graduated from Edina High School in 1974, and moved back to Edina 20 years ago. I live in the 58`h and France neighborhood. I am writing to commend you on your forward- thinking, progressive support of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund. This is exactly the kind of program that makes a substantial difference in my life and the life of my family. By creating this fund, you put in place improvements that will help make the streets safer for all of us. Why is this so- important to me? Both my son and I are regular bicycle commuters. He is a sophomore at Edina High School and commutes by bicycle to school, as do several of his friends. Safe routes to school could not be more important in helping us create the next generation of active, fit adults! By creating this fund, you are creating a mechanism to enable continued development of safe bicycling infrastructure for our younger riders and commuters. As for me, I commute an average of three times each week, year- round. For a woman in her "late 50's," the health effects of regular riding are dramatic: Lower cholesterol and healthy weight management resulting in less use of our medical resources. Quality of life is enhanced dramatically as well. Not only is riding a bicycle is just plain FUN, but our collective ability to walk and bike helps to create a sense of community. Notice neighbors talking with each other on the street, rather than offering a wave while driving by! Safe riding routes in and through Edina and neighboring communities (I ride to south Bloomington) are critical to Edina's success as an attractive and livable community! Again, thank you so much for your commitment to the community of Edina. By creating the Edina Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund to support Edina as a walkable and bikeable community, you create a future where residents can connect with one another, be fit and healthy, and enjoy cleaner air and friendlier streets! With deep appreciation, Lori Richman 5828 Ewing Avenue South (952) 920 -7838 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 3:23 PM To: Ann Braden; Courtney Whited; 'Jennifer Janovy'; 'Michael Thompson'; Nathan Franzen; 'Paul Nelson'; Steven Schweiger; Surya lyer, Tom La Force cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Council and Edina Transportation Commission - in support of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund -<1 ~, Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Y rf?i i`,,;i 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(- EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN.gov `....For Living, Learning, Rai ing Families & Doing Busin. ess t From: LaVonne Leih jmailto:lavon he. lei h @gmail.coml Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 3:16 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: City Council and Edina Transportation Commission in support of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund Dear City Council and Edina Trasportion Commission, My name is LaVone Leih and I live on Lincoln Drive in Edina, MN. My family and I moved to Edina from Hopins in June 2011, so we have lived there just over a year. I know that cities are under pressure to provide better living and recreational spaces, but don't always have the funding necessary meet these needs. I also know that it can be hard to ask residents to help pay for the changes they would like to see within their communities, or to locate other resources that are willing to fund those changes. Having said all this, Edina residents are progressive and the Improvement Fund offers a way for us to pitch in on the cost, while ensuring that it is not a large financial burden on any of our residents. I would like to thank the City of Edina and the Transportation Commission for recognizing and addressing the safeey and health concerns of our communities, and creating the Pedestrain and Bicycle Improvement Funs. in response. In my neighborhood, there are no sidewalks. This means that anyone walking must do so in the street. This creates a safety concern that extends to all types of residents: the elderly, children going to or coming from their bus stops, people out walking with small children or pets, etc. There are also no bicycle lanes, and while I know members of my community that have. bikes, I rarely see anyone riding them in the neighborhood. I would like to see sidewalks and bicycle lanes on both sides of Lincoln Drive and Lincoln Circle, as well as along the frontage road on'the east side of Highway 169 and on the streets leading to the parks located in the area. I don't feel that a few dollars a month are too high a price to pay for the safety and health of my family and my neighbors. Sincerely, LaVonne Leih Edina Resident Oa 1 _ rd SatUayy -�_ Octo 2 0 , 110 so • • AN join us for a FREE shredding event! Shred documents you no longer need in a safe and secure way. Bring five non - perishable food donations to support VEAP and receive a 10% off coupon for Edina Liquor. �,. I„ �; ,�O r. � � �� �> >t Susan Howl From: James Hovland Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 4:01 PM 'c: Susan Howl subject: FW: Southwest Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement Available for Review & Comment :.., Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ': f 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 "� Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov J, ...For Living, Learning, Raisin, Families & Doing Business From: Southwest Transitway [ mailto :swcorridor(&co.hennepin.mn.usl Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:56 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Southwest Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement Available for Review & Comment U you're Laving trouble viewing ti,is ernail, you fray see it Online. Share this:: r- Efan§itujoy Southwest Transitway DEIS Available The Southwest Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) is now available for your review and comment. The DEIS documents the potential social and environmental impacts of the Southwest Transitway project and discusses the purpose and need for the project, the alternatives considered, the impacts of those alternatives, and the agencies and people consulted. Where can I read the DEIS? The DEIS and supporting technical memoranda and appendices are available on southwesttransitway.org. Hard copies have been placed in city halls and libraries along the corridor. Click here for a list of locations. How do I comment on the DEIS? Comments must be submitted by Tuesday, December 11 and may be submitted: By Email: swcorridor(cDco.hennepin.mn.us By Mail: Hennepin County Housing, Community Works & Transit Attn: Southwest Transitway 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Or at a Public Hearing: Tuesday, November 13 4:00 — 5:00 pm Open House; 4:30 pm Public Hearing Hennepin County Government Center 300 South Sixth Street A -2400 Minneapolis, MN 55487 Wednesday, November 14 5:00 — 6:00 pm Open House; 6:00 pm Public Hearing St. Louis Park City Hall 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Thursday, November 29 5:00 — 6:00 pm Open House; 6:00 pm Public Hearing Eden Prairie City Hall 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 For more information please visit www.southwesttransitway.org 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 1 Minneapolis, MN 55415 www.southwesttransitway..org 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 1 Minneapolis, MN 55415 US This email was sent to jhovland(fti.edina.mn.us. To ensure that you continue receiving our emails, please add us to your address book or safe list. manage your preferences I opt out using TrueRemoveCR). Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails. Susan Howl From: Julia Parenteau rmailto:iuliap @mplsrealtor.coml Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 2:08 PM _ To: Edina Mail Cc: Scott Neal Subject: Edina Housing Statistics - September 2012 Good Afternoon,Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council - Attached please find the most recent housing statistics from the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS ®, for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities metro area.. This report describe_ sour market in September 2012. Please let me know if you have any questions. As always, if you are interested in seeing more in -depth statistics and figures for your�city or other cities and counties in the metro – please feel free to check out our online statistical reports at www.mplsreal.tor.com. The Thing, our interactive market analytics tool, is very useful, as it offers many choices of variables for your review. Check it out here: http : / /thething.mplsrealtor.com/ (October 10, 2012) – Local housing market recovery continues to roll forward in the Twin Cities 13- county metropolitan area. In September, more homes sold in less time at higher prices and for closer to asking price than last year. The median sales price was up 12.3 percent to $174,000; the only missing component was seller_ confidence. Sellers brought 5,341 properties to the market, 4.1 percent fewer than last year. The number of homes for sale on the market fell 29.4 percent to 15,996 -near a 9 -year low – making seller conviction and optimism increasingly critical. The number of homes for sale has dropped for 20 consecutive months and is below 16,000 for the first time since December 2003. Months' supply of.inventory fell 40.9 percent to 4.0 months. This indicates that the` market is on the brink of favoring sellers. Figures below 4.0 months supply are moving toward a sellers' market. The landscape for sellers continues to brighten..On average, homes sold in 101 days, 28.7 percent faster than last year at this time. Sellers received, on average, 94.8 percent of their list price, 4.1 percent more than last year. Cashbuyers made up 19.3 percent of all closed sales. ".Interest rates in the Twin Cities are around 3.4 percent and buyers have a justified sense of urgency," said Andy Fazendin, MAAR President= Elect. "Housing has gone from.a laggard the past few years to leading the charge in 2012." Julia Parenteau Public Affairs Director Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® p. (952) 988 -3124 e. iuliap@mplsrealtor.com i Local Market update - September 2012 ��► A RESEARCH TOOL. PROVIDED HY -,HE MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS(. MINNEAPOLIS AREA Aps- iarinn o REAI- .TORS` -4.1% +4.3% +12.3% ---------9------------------------------ Twin Cities Change in Change in Change in New Listings Closed Sales Median Sales Price ------------------------ ---------- - - - --- Region September Year to Date 5,571 5,341 -4.1% + 4.3% New Listings Closed Sales 56,469 53,638 -5.0% +16.9% New Listings Closed Sales I... .:r�'':Ir; .. ,..3. ...,.. ..r.'3 :li ll i.:3 f'C .F�Q<j •UI F.7a- ,.. a. ,..,i :. f'•., ..y ....rJ,•.,. F ?rr,,. .. ::E)...,• ,,, .+1:. .. ..,n;n -Z-Z1 ..u, 2011 2012 +/- 2011 2012 New Listings 5,571 5,341 -4.1% 56,469 53,638 -5.0% Closed Sales 3,735 3,897 +4.3% 31,332 36,613 +16.9% Median Sales Price' $155,000 $174,000 +12.3% $151,000 $165,500 +9.6% Average Sales Price' $194,830 $217,290 +11.5% $194,134 $208,210 +7.3% Price Per Square Foot` $94 $105 +11.3% $93 $99 +6.4% Percent of Original List Price Received` 91.1% 94.8% +4.1% 90.5% 93.9% +3.8% Days on Market Until Sale 142 101 -28.7% 150 121 -19.3% Inventory of Homes for Sale 22,663 15,996 -29.4% -- -- Months Supply of Inventory 6.7 4.0 -40.3% September 2011 02012 Year to Date 2011 .2012 5,571 5,341 -4.1% + 4.3% New Listings Closed Sales 56,469 53,638 -5.0% +16.9% New Listings Closed Sales I... .:r�'':Ir; .. ,..3. ...,.. ..r.'3 :li ll i.:3 f'C .F�Q<j •UI F.7a- ,.. a. ,..,i :. f'•., ..y ....rJ,•.,. F ?rr,,. .. ::E)...,• ,,, .+1:. .. ..,n;n -Z-Z1 ..u, -2.9% -14.9% New Listings Closed Sales +1.8% +35.5% New Listings Closed Sales :1..1 r'; 0 1: 1� r,.- J7, e, :.,,! 1", 1, 1 j,", "'I r o' 1 T rl :1 f e. 1 111, ,j e% Ali 4 Tirim R" I Mult. o�. l. J Local Market Update - September 2012 A RT.SI,_ARGI1 1 '14. MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORSO MI N N I AP () 1. AR W A A R E A [-TO R S' -2.9% -14.9% +13.0% ---------------------------------------- Change in Change Change Edina Listings - - - - - - - ---------------------------- Closed Sales - - --- Median Sales Price September Year to Date 2011 2012 2011 2012 New Listings 105 102 -2.9% 1,050 1,069 +1.8% Closed Sales 74 63 -14.9% 533 722 +35.5% Median Sales Price* $324,000 $366,000 +13.0% $345,000 $347,000 +0.6% Average Sales Price* $360,970 $442,622 +22.6% $434,913 $430,912 -0.9% Price Per Square Foot* $144 $153 +6.0% $159 $158 -0.7% Percent of Original List Price Received* 91.4% 91.5% +0.1% 90.8% 92.3% +1.7% Days on Market Until Sale 139 114 -18.1% 153 143 -6.7% Inventory of Homes for Sale 462 298 -35.5% Months Supply of Inventory 7.8 3.9 -50.0% oe vminl for ionk n,n dow) r 1 September 2011 n2012 Year to Date 2011 02012 105 102 1,050 1,069 -2.9% -14.9% New Listings Closed Sales +1.8% +35.5% New Listings Closed Sales :1..1 r'; 0 1: 1� r,.- J7, e, :.,,! 1", 1, 1 j,", "'I r o' 1 T rl :1 f e. 1 111, ,j e% Ali 4 Tirim R" I Mult. o�. l. J Susan Howl , Subject: FVV: City Council and Edina Transportation Commission — in support of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund Subject: City Council and Edina Transportation Commission — in support of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Fund Dear Edina City Council, and Transportation Commission, My name is Jessica Schaeppi, and I am a resident of the Country Club neighborhood. My husband and I moved to Edina 2.5 years ago to live in a community that was walkable and bikeable. I am writing to express my support for the numerous bike and pedestrian improvements that Edina has moved forward in the last year. I am particularly excited by the Edina City Council's support of a fund to support bike and pedestrian improvements. The minimal monthly fee are well worth the impact of the fund. These improvements are critical to making our community successful in the future. I know it is a challenge to allocate valuable resources to bicycle and pedestrian improvements, as they often fall to the bottom of many cities priorities. But Edina's commitment to a walkable and bikeable community is why we believe our family will want to stay in Edina for the majority of our lives. I am excited to teach my son, Asa, to ride his bike, and walk to meet his friends. I lived in NYC for 7 years, and we lived in downtown Minneapolis for a year. In downtown Minneapolis, walking and biking should have seemed easy- but it didn't- groceries and stores were far, bike parking was limited. I missed walking and biking like I did in NYC. One of the chief reasons we bought a home in Edina, and Country Club was how walkable and bike friendly the community seemed. I am incredibly happy that this has improved in our time in Edina. While our community is walkable- there is maintenance to do on some of our sidewalks. I walk my son to daycare most days, and the sidewalks along 50th and our neighborhood are starting to crumble. A fund like the Council is planning is critical to maintaining and improving the walkability of my community. I also believe the sidewalks in our neighborhood are a key part of maintaining our property values. I am thankful that Edina has done more in the last year to build a community that is truly walkable and bikeable. I can easily get groceries on foot, or safely teach my son to bike to school one day. I know we will use improved sidewalks, and enjoy the safety afforded by the bike lane on Wooddale. Please continue this important work, as it makes Edina the healthy, pedestrian and bike friendly community 'I want to raise my kids in. Thank you for your consideration. Warmly, Jessica Schaeppi 4600 Bruce Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 1:48 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Invitation to Interfaith Forum on Domestic Violence Attachments: DV faith training.pdf Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(_EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kaye Aho jmailto:kayeaho(cbyahoo.coml Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 1:46 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Invitation to Interfaith Forum on Domestic Violence Dear City of Edina Mayor and Council Members, You are invited to Cornerstone's Interfaith Forum on Domestic Violence on October 28th from 1 -4PM. Attached is detailed information including our registration link. We hope to see you there. Please email infoCcr�cornerstonemn.org with questions. Thank you, Kaye L. Aho Cornerstone Board of Directors W*' f , Are you concerned about the issue of domestic violence and how it may affect members of your congregation? In this training you will learn how to effectively support someone experiencing domestic violence, what it means to hold a batterer accountable and what your congregation can do about this issue. Cornerstone will be offering this training free of charge. Being held at Edinbrook Church in Brooklyn Park 4300 Edinbrook Parkway North Sunday, October 28, 2012 from 1 -4 pm Register at http : / /dvchampions,eventbrite.com or email: info @cornerstonemn.org with questions. Cornerstone 1 1000 East 80th Street Bloomington, MN 55420 952.884.0376 1 corners tonemn. org MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM AUGUST 16, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Franzen, Iyer,Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was amended; by member Janovy to move the BETF to after Community Comment to accommodate Sgt Olson who was in attendance for the Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion. Motion.was made by member LaForce and seconded !by`member Iyer approving the amended aeenda. ,All voted ave. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 19 2012 Member Whited amended :the minutes to add the following to. the Streetcar Presentation to the 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence, 'one stop parking option stands to help emphasize Southdale as a go to place; and this mode of operation is more friendly travel for seniors.' Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Janovy to approve the amended Julv 19 minutes. All voted ave. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Gretchen Cooper and Bill, 58th & Chowen, said their concern has gotten progressive over the last 7 years with the number of cars that are speeding between 57th & 58th and the increase in cut thru traffic during the school year. She said -)ne month ago she yelled at a driver going about 40 -45 mph and the driver turned around, came back and'yelled explicits at her and said.she was speeding because she was coming down the hill. Ms. Cooper said something needs to be done. She said she is aware that speed bumps are a problem for snow plows and she knows the police are monitoring the area but the pro blemincreases on the weekends and holidays usually. She said the drivers are both teens and adults. Director Houle was asked if speed data was available and he said he would need to check. He said if the occurrences are at the same time every day the police can be notified for smart enforcement. A school bus was noted as a culprit that speeds through'the same time every day. Mr. Houle said larger vehicles can often appear to.be going faster than they really are. Member Whited.said the issue is that the area is convenient for cut_thru traffic and Mr. Houle said it is scheduled for.reconstruction in a couple years and they can look at plans to address the issues. Member Janovy said this . area has.come up a.few times and wondered if a slightly different approach should be taken: °:She said reviewing speed, volume; historyof,.traffic safety'requests and crashes is` probably a`good starting point but asking residents to wait a couple years might not. be. Suggested solutions were putting out the speed monitor to educate drivers of how fast they . are driving and adding:it to,Pthe Traffic Safety'Committee (TSC) report in-order to.track'it. Mr. Houle said .staff will provide all the data at the next meeting and also add this to the TSC. Member lyer asked if staff tracks calls or issue areas and Mr. Houle said:yes,.they arearacked on a map. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS Sidewalk.Ordinance Discussion, Member Janovy said at the TLC Bike Blvd public hearing, someone asked about bikes, strollers and wheelchairs on sidewalks and it was the first time she realized that bikes were not allowed. She brought the issue to the BETF and her ,eport is from their discussion that recommends changing the ordinance to liberalize biking on sidewalk, allow biking on sidewalks in business districts and also allow parking on sidewalks. In conversation with the City.of Minneapolis' bike A coordinator, he told her that they allow biking on sidewalks but not in business districts but he knows it happens and they are studying the issue. Peter Kelley, chair of the BETF and member Janovy met recently with Sgt. Olson to discuss the issue. BETF liaison, Sgt. Tim Olson, was in attendance to explain the Police Department's opinion on biking on sidewalks which he said is based on safety. Sgt. Olson said allowing bikes on sidewalk would increase the safety risks at the expense of a small percentage of bikers. He said the City was aware of what they were doing when the ordinance was put together. He said further that the City is making an effort to provide bike lanes on the roads and that state statute has specific rules for biking on roadways. Sgt. Olson said he met with members Janovy and Kelley and they agreed there is a public safety issue by riding on the sidewalk. He said the department is reluctant to support open use of the sidewalk but recognizes exceptions and inconsistencies, e.g., a child learning to ride on the sidewalk and a parent riding with the child are not safety concerns because they would be riding slow; the upcoming France Avenue sidewalk project is not a concern because of the width of the sidewalk — it will not present a risk; and having parking stations on sidewalks. He said the ordinance could be modified to address these exceptions and inconsistences. Additionally, the ordinance references a bike registration law that was repealed by the state in 2005, so it is in effect adhering to an outdated law. Discussion Member Whited asked about bike collisions with seniors and Sgt. Olson said to date, there have not been any collisions on sidewalks. He said they do not actively enforce the sidewalk ordinance and in fact, most ordinances are enforced based on complaints but at least the ordinance is in place when enforcement is necessary. Member lyer asked if the ordinance should be used for high traffic areas like 66th & Valley View versus a residential street. Sgt. Olson said the biking population is so small, it does not warrant changing the ordinance. He said the focus should instead be on what is convenient for pedestrians, not for bikers. Member Bass said there are adults who do not like being in the streets and she sees both children and adults on sidewalks every day. She said some riders are comfortable in the streets while others are not. She said also that people do moderate their behavior accordingly and there have not been any crashes; however, they should allow for people who are making a safe choice based on comfort level and ability to do so legally. He said the ordinance is effective because there have not been any accidents and allowing for change has the potential for problems. He said the current system works well and there is no need to increase the risks to pedestrians based on a small population of bikers who already have a place to ride. Member La Force said the ordinance is a good policy but he also thinks it is a problem when they have ordinances that do not reflect the practices of what is going on. He said most people are probably not aware that it is illegal to ride on sidewalks and he wondered what behavior change they would see if they were to tell people. Sgt. Olson said he believes most people would prefer to not have more bikers on the sidewalk. Member lyer said it does increase the risks if they add bikers to sidewalks. Sgt. Olson asked what is the need to put bikes on sidewalk when there is an adjacent roadway. He said the City is making strides to accommodate bikers with bike lanes like they have on 70th. He said integration of the different modes of transportation will create problems. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Iver to table the current discussion and allow them to think over what was learned for discussion at a later date. All voted ave. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of August 1. 2012 Section A.I. Member Janovy did a revision of the speed table policy for discussion. She did not include a speed threshold because 27 mph, in context, could be considered unsafe so why wait for 30 -35 mph to do something. Member Thompson ask to remove item #6 and allow for engineering judgment and member Janovy said she would prefer not to. Members lyer and Nelson agreed that item #6 should be removed. Member Franzen said the revision is concise and well written and agreed with deleting #6. Member Janovy agreed. Motion was made by member Iver and seconded by member Franzen to adopt member Janovv's revised speed table policy without item #6 and without the notation section. All voted ave. Motion carried. ,ection A.2 Member Janovy said °the revision is nicely improved: She asked about item #4 because she came home recently and found a contractor had closed Morningside Road. She said they had pulled a street bond but not a road closed permit. She asked if -it should specify pulling both and also notifying residents because a resident coming home for lunch would not have had access. Mr. Houle said a road closed permit would require the contractor to post a detour but in this case he did not pull one. Regarding item #5, member Janovy asked if it would be helpful to reference the parking requirement either here or in item #6. Member Janovy will forward her comments to Mr. Houle for inclusion. Section A.3 Member Janovy said the statement "The City of Edina policy regarding parking restrictions requires present conditions that im pacts. traffic safety in order to restrict parking" is not reflected in the current Parking Policy as the only factor. She said there are other reasons to restrict parking and noted the sentence as inaccurate or misleading. . Section B.2 Member Janovy circulated a memo explaining the background of this intersection. She said this is a long standing issue from the 2005 NE Study. She said a raised intersection with marked crosswalk was originally planned.but all raised intersections were taken out by the City, Council. She said crossing at Grimes is difficult because of visibility and there is frustration after having stopped at six stops signs previously. She said the intersection serves as crossing for the Country Club, 50th & France, and 44th and France. Member Bass said another stop sign is adding a problem further down the road and suggested a traffic.circle, not to stop cars but slow them down. Member Janovy said a traffic circle was recommended in a Resident Area Safety Improvement plan but since that time the curb line was reconstructed. Mr. Houle said the intersection was realigned to fix a surface water issue but that if could be realigned to fit a traffic circle and crosswalks could be included. He said he would prefer to do a study so that he could include to the east where speeding is occurring. Member Thompson agreed and suggested a corridor study instead of spot review. Mr. Houle suggested deferring this to a later date to lay out a plan for j corridor study. This was moved to section C. Motion made by member Bass and seconded by member Thompson to approve the amended August 1 TSC report. All voted ave. Motion carried. 2012 Bikeways Project Mr. Houle said City Council requested that Alliant Engineering look at the plans and Mike Anderson's memo and mark- ups were distributed. He said the BETF also reviewed the plans and their memo and mark -ups for 70th & Antrim were also distributed and he recommended accepting their suggestion. Member Janovy said she compared the original plans to the mark ups and will,give Mr. Houle her findings. Additionally, Mr. Houle sought support for using a resolution or an ordinance to designate bike lanes. The consensus was to use an ordinance and to-revise the draft ordinance. to end at '...Section 169:222.' in section 1420.04. Mr. Houle said the plans will go back to City Council on Sept 4 and the Public Works Department will begin shortly thereafter. Motion made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to support the bike and striping plans with clarification of questions raised and'ordinance.with deletion of everything after 169.222 in section 1420.04. All voted ave. Motion carried. Updates Student Member Mr. Houle said a new student member was appointed and she will begin next month. s Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of July 12, 2012 Member Janovy said the BETF voted to become a working group of the ETC because it is currently not part of the City structure and this was made very clear by CM Neal when chair Kelley sought reimbursements for expenditures related to the BETF website and he was told the BETF was similar to the Hockey Association and reimbursement was not approved. She said they discussed whether or not they would be able to continue to function as it has, if it becomes a working group. She said they have their own website and gets in kind donation and would they be able to continue this way. She said the BETF was set up for a specific task and the task was completed but they've continued to operate as though they were part of the City structure. Discussion to be continued. Living Streets Working Group Member Thompson said he asked for comments on the overview that the consultant gave at the last meeting and those comments were received and forwarded to the consultant. He said the handout is a revision that includes the comments. Member Thompson said the next step is to meet with staff, other commissions, other stakeholders and public outreach. Member Laforce asked if people have heard about this process and have provided any feedback. Member Bass said people who are interacting with Do.Town have been told about Complete Streets. Member La Force said he is fairly certain that there is a candidate running for State Legislature that is against it. Moving forward, phase 1 is done said member Thompson and phase 2 is unfunded. He said No. St. Paul spent approximately $150,000 developing their plan. Member Janovy asked if franchise fees could be used for policy development. Mr. Houle said he included $200,000 in his budget for this type of work, plus a transportation engineer and he could reword it. Member Bass suggested putting together a progress report for the original funders and see if they have additional funds for phase II. Member Janovy said she had asked this of Robin and she said did not have any more funds. Mr. Houle recommended having a consultant and transportation staff both working on this so he will redo his budget. Member Bass said Do.Town staff is available until March 2013. Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said they reviewed VEAP's program to see how it can serve Edina's needs. Her agency, PRISM, and VEAP will be agencies that Hennepin County will rely on to serve communities when they break up their downtown service center. Next month, Becky McBride, project manager from the Met Council will be in attendance to talk about the BE Line so the group can see if it can BE for Edina and the timing is perfect as they are looking at revamping this line. The working group minutes will be included in the ETC packet from now on. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS— None. Member Janovy asked if this is when they would talk about 581h & Halifax and member Whited said she wondered the same about her neighborhood and if it should be discussed under Living Streets. Mr. Houle said the correspondence was sent to Council and staff and it is not clear to him what should be brought forward to the ETC. He said it is difficult when staff is being pulled in so many directions when they are already doing so much and residents do not believe that staff is doing anything to help. He said it is difficult when there are no funding, limited state aid funds or requests not meeting state aid requirements. Member Thompson said part of it is education and recognizing that they cannot help everyone. Member Bass said the goal is to generate support now for when street projects come around. Member Janovy said it is also getting people involved with programs like as Operation Lead Foot. They talked about inexpensive ways to deal with speeding such as equipping residents with radar guns, flagging speed limit signs to draw attention and getting residents involved at the neighborhood level. Chair Nelson asked if these emails are forwarded to the traffic safety coordinator and Mr. Houle said this was the first of its kind so they need to develop a process because they will be receiving more. Member Bass said engineering is the best approach since not everyone will become involved but it looks like the City Council is responding residents and this is helpful. 4 r CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 2013 Work Plan Chair Nelson said CM Neal wants this by September. Suggested items were Sidewalk Plan; Way Finding for sidewalks/ pedestrians and standard for signage; France Ave Crosswalks; Safe Routes to School; Review Transportation & CIP; Pedestrian Plan; same items as last year's plan excluding the TLC Bike Blvd; and communication /education. Chair Nelson will update the 2013 Work Plan and email to everyone. Chair Nelson said he spoke with Floyd Gabriel, chair of the Planning Commission (PC) about scheduling a meeting between the two commissions to talk about planning and transportation and the meeting is scheduled for September 27, 6 -7 p.m.,(one hour before the PC's regular schedule meeting). He said it is not a mandatory meeting for the ETC and the agenda is still to be defined. Chair Nelson said Hennepin County is drafting a Pedestrian Plan and Rose Ryan is willing to attend the next meeting to talk about it. He said they are having community meetings but nothing is planned for Edina - the closest meeting is in the Crystal /New Hope area. Member Janovy said Councilmember Brindle mentioned contraflow bike lanes on Normandale between 66th & 701h. She said the shoulder has been mistaken for bike lane and asked if it could be striped for bike lane. She asked what the process is when a councilmember brings up something that is related to transportation during a council meeting. Mr. Houle said they generally follow up with the councilmember and staff is currently working on a feasibility study for bike lanes and sidewalk on Normandale between.66th and 70tH Member Janovy said at TAB they still do not know how much federal money they will be getting. She said the Met Council has a new website, Thrive Msp.com, and wants people to weigh in on what's needed to thrive in 2040 — housing, jobs, transportation, etc. Member Whited said a new neighbor parks his car with a cover for days at a time and wondered if this was legal. Mr. Houle suggested contacting Sgt. Olson. Member lyer.said his neighbor asked him about the new special assessment interest rates. Mr. Houle said he will cover this in his staff report. Member Franzen said he attended the 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting and it was one of the best ran public meetings he's ever attended and in speaking with neighbors they also felt the same way. He said it was very.decisive and residents knew what was or was not allowed and there was no room for them to go off on tangents about things such as the special assessment. Chair Nelson said there appear to be street projects going on that the ETC did not know about, i.e. the frontage road 'near City Hall. Mr. Houle said Public Works is doing a mill and overlay project. Member Janovy said this type of work provides opportunity for restriping. Mr. Houle said he will speak with Brian Olson, Public Works Director to learn their schedule. STAFF COMMENTS France Avenue Update — Mr. Houle said option 3 was approved by City Council for a $4M budget; staff is working with property owners to acquire ROW at no cost; the monuments were taken out; existing sidewalk at Whole Foods will stay; starting detail plans immediately; finalizing memo to the state within the next week; and will reach out to Hennepin County for funding gap. It is unknown at this time if the newly acquired ROW would become the City's or Hennepin ounty's. ti. TLC Bike Boulevard Update — this project will begin next week - Wooddale to be seal coated by Public Works; and a counter /video monitor was mounted today at 60th & Wooddale to take bike and pedestrian counts as part of the project. Status 2012 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Proiects — Richmond Hills, Countryside, and Tracy Ave projects will be going through September /October; others will be completed by Labor Day. Status 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Proiects — informational meeting held for 4 of 5 neighborhoods; Normandale is scheduled for September 5 (being consulted to SEH); staff incorporated recommendations from the communications audit that was done (executive summary will be shared with the ETC); draft feasibility studies will be ready for the next meeting; checking to see if staff can have a special public hearing meeting with City Council to approve all the projects at once. On August 6, City Council approved first reading of afranchise fee per home to fund sidewalks, trails and street lights so no longer assessed. The special assessment policy was revised to include payback from 10 to 15 years and interest rate from 2 to 1 percent above the bond interest rate. At the next City Council meeting they will reconsider including the 2011 project areas into the policy change. Member Janovy asked for an update on W. 44th at the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall - Community Room Tuesday, September 1.1, 2012 -7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Carr, .and Members Stegner, Davis, Curran, Anger, Moore, Christiaansen, Mellom, Sussman, and Johnson. Absent were Members Davis and Good. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Curran moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Regular meeting of August 13, 2012 Member Christiaansen moved approval of the minutes from the August 13, 2012, meeting of the board. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT A. Kitty. O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue Ms. O'Dea introduced a photo inventory of homes she has identified as Tudor style in the Country Club District and asked the HPB to access the database at http: / /photobucket.com /ehpb password: preserveCCD, review the. photos, and 'provide her with feedback on the following: I. Would the photo inventory be a useful tool? 2. What functionality the-HPB would like to see (e.g. sort)? 3. What tags /key words for sorting should be added (e.g. street, style, age, etc.)? Chair Carr thanked Ms. O'Dea.for her efforts to assist the HPB in identifying the built environment of the Country Club District. Member Stegner commented that the HPB should also refer to previous inventories to ensure that the information provided in the photo inventory is consistent with previous studies of the district. Ms. O'Dea asked that the HPB provided her with their feedback prior to the October meeting. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes September 11, 2012 B. Thomas Raeuchlel, 4634 Bruce Avenue Mr. Raeuchle addressed the board with a request that when considering projects related to a Certificate of Appropriateness application the HPB use the plan of treatment as the guide, and not be driven by. personal style or preference. He observed that houses evolve over time, and if tastefully done, a renovation project can introduce more contemporary elements, and should not be -forced to introduce fake historic elements. Mr. Raeuchle concluded that he encouraged the HPB to keep an open mind when reviewing COA applications. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Certificate of Appropriateness #H -12 -6 4901 Bruce Avenue Request: Changes to Street Facing Facade for Attached Garage Addition Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the southeast corner of Bruce Avenue and Country Club Road. The home, constructed in 1934 is a Colonial Revival style with an attached one story 2 -car garage accessed from the north on Country Club Road. The proposed project entails reconstructing the 2 car attached garage with a small deck above leading into a second story master suite addition; and a first floor kitchen and dining space added to the rear of the home. The plan also includes converting the existing den on the south side of the home back to the original screened porch, replacing the aluminum siding with a 5 7/8" architectural horizontal lapboard from LLP Smart Side, as well as replacing all the home's windows (which will include providing two. sets of windows flanking either side of the front entry on both the first and second story of the front elevation). A revised front entry is also proposed with the removal of the brickwork surrounding the doorway and adding traditional pilasters on either side of the door and a rams -head pediment over the door. In keeping with the Colonial architectural style, the existing louvered shutters will be replaced with new. It is the intention of this project to update the home to meet the needs of the homeowner, and at the same time add traditional Colonial style elements which are currently lacking. Preservation Consultant Vogel provided an evaluation of the project and determined that the proposed changes the home will visually enhance the historic character of the neighborhood and will not detract from the district's historic significance. Planner Repya concurred with Mr. Vogel's evaluation and recommended approval of the COA request subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque added to the addition. Findings supporting the approval recommendation included: • No significant historic architectural features or fabric of the home will be destroyed. • The proposed alterations are compatible with the historic character of the house. • The plans provided with the subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of f 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes September 11, 2012 the project. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of,the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment: . Applicant's Mark and Kristina Dietzen, 4901 Bruce Avenue answered questions and provided the board with clarification on the proposed plans. Members Anger; Stegner and' Curran: commented that the proposed plans enhance the original home; adding that they liked the symmetry,of the plans for the front elevation. Member Anger observed that while he struggles with master suite additions on the historic homes, the plans do improve upon the existing structure. Member Sussman opined that the plans are handsome; however he questioned the lack of symmetry provided with the addition on the north elevation where the original home had been symmetrical. Member Moore stated that he liked the plans which capture the Colonial elements of the home, while transcending the family's needs into the 21st century. Member Stegner too appreciated the design commenting that it was clean, not over detailed and compatible with the historic neighborhood. Student Member Johnson shared that he too liked the symmetry of the plans for the front elevation,: noting that the project will „really enhance the home. Member Curran stated that the proposed plans provide for a classic Colonial home that is a good fit for its surroundings. Chair Carr observed she agreed with the previous comments that the proposed changes are compatible with the historic homes in the, Country Club District. Member.Stegner then moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness subject to the plans presented:and,a year :built.plaque placed on the exterior of the addition. Member Curran seconded the motion. All voted'aye. The motion carried. VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. 2013 Work Plan Planner Repya explained that the City Council has asked all boards and commissions to submit 2013 work plans using a new uniform format to them for consideration at an upcoming.work session. Because the due date for the for work plans was prior to the HPB meeting, Planner Repya and Chair Carr -provided the City Council a woik plan taking into consideration the previous work plan discussions of.the board. Ms. Repya concluded that the City Council will meet with the Chairs of all the boards and commissions for a work session on September 19th to discuss the plans provided. 3 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes September 11, 2012 A copy of the HPB 2013 work plan was provided for board members information. Board members shared the following ideas for potential items to consider adding to the work : P Ian: • Member Anger suggested working on having all of the landmark properties identified with a plaque. • Member Stegner observed that he would like to see a stronger reference to expanding the list of properties determined eligible for landmark designation. Chair Carr thanked Members Anger and Stegner for their input, pointing out that the work plan will be a helpful communication tool between the Board's and the City Council, and she looked forward to filling the HPB in on the outcome of the September 19th work session with the Council. B. 4524 Bruce Avenue — COA — Modified Plan Meeting Date Planner Repya reported that the applicant requesting a COA for construction of a new home at 4524 Bruce Avenue has modified the plans originally approved at the July 9th HPB meeting, per the orders from the City Council on August 6th. In the past, when a COA has been appealed, an extra meeting of the HPB has been called to consider the revised plans. Recently, the current owners of the property, Lorie and Jeff Ericson requested a meeting on October I st or 2nd in lieu of waiting for the regular October 9th meeting. The Ericson's reported that if the item were not to be heard until October 9th, their closing on this home with JMS and the purchase of a new home would be in jeopardy. Board members agreed that the Ericson's request was reasonable. Upon taking a tally, the Board agreed that Monday, October I n at 7:00 p.m. would work best for them. Ms. Repya agreed to notify the Mr. and Mrs. Ericson, JMS Custom Homes, as well as the surrounding neighbors who had received previous mailings of the meeting date to hear the COA. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Carr— HPB Meeting Procedures Chair Carr reported that during the NAPC (National Association of Preservation Commissions) conference she attended this past summer, there was a session offered for preservation commission chairpersons which provided some great tips on running an efficient and informative meeting. Some of the suggestions she thought would benefit Edina's HPB would be to have an announcement at the beginning of each meeting explaining the mission and goals of the board; explaining the meeting procedures; and asking board members if they have had any ex -pane conversations, or conflict of interest relative to issues to be addressed. Chair Carr added that she would also like Planner Repya to provide an explanation of the process and review criteria prior to introducing a new Certificate of Appropriateness request. Board members agreed that providing the public with information on the goals /process/ and criteria used for review would go a long way to providing an understanding of the preservation issues pertinent to a topic, as well as to help the board focus on the relevant aspects of a project. 4 a Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes September 11, 2012 Following a brief, discussion on identifying the relevant issues to be discussed when the board reviews a COA request, Member Curran pointed out that the relevant issues should be pertinent to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the Country Club District's Plan of Treatment, not one's personal opinions. Ms. Curran than.offered to compile a set of guidelines. the board could use when reviewing COA applications. Board members agreed that would be a great idea and thanked Member Curran for taking the initiative to provide clarity to the decision.making process. Member Stegner A. Invitation to Morningside Bungalow Homeowners Member Stegner commented that upon reviewing g-a copy of the proposed letter to the six bungalow property owner on the north side of W. 44th Street inviting them to an information meeting for landmark designation, he was surprised that there was not a signature line for the Mayor. Mr. Stegner recalled that at the HPB work session with the City Council last June, it was discussed that having the Mayor's signature included on the letters of invitation for landmark designation would add a level of importance to the letters and signify the City Council's support. Planner Repya agreed'that she could redraft the letters to include the Mayor's signature. Mr. Stegner also suggested that the owner of one of the private homes locally designated could attend the in meeting to provide share their experiences and perhaps quell some fears and misconceptions. The board agreed that would be a good idea. Ms. Repya stated that she would contact some of the landmark owners-to see if they would help with the information meeting. Member,Sussman asked if the HPB was only considering the landmark designation of the six bungalow homes on W. 44th Street, or if other Morningside Bungalows would be considered. Ms. Repya explained that the HPB would entertain landmark designation requests from any owner of a Morningside Bungalow property. B. Coldwater Springs Park & Ft. Snelling — Preservation Initiatives. Member Stegner alerted the board to a current preservation issues in the news at Coldwater Springs Park and at nearby historic Ft. Snelling. , At Coldwater Springs, located at the south end of Minnehaha Park, and known as the historic birthplace of Minnesota, the National Park Service has announced that they-have fnished their work on preserving the native prairie grasses in the area. At Ft. Snelling, there is an ongoing initiative to tear down dilapidated buildings at the historic fort. Mr. Stegner stressed the importance of these issues to preservation in the region and encouraged his fellow, board members to check them out, adding that there is good information on line. Member Mellom — France Avenue Apartments (Minneapolis) Member Mellom reported that a plan to build an apartment building on the east side of 4500 block of France Avenue has been stalled by a Linden Hills neighborhood group concerned by the height and density of the proposed building and the fact that there is currently a moratorium on new development in the area. Although located in Minneapolis, the proposed site abuts Edina s White Oaks neighborhood Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes September 11, 2012 and a potential redevelopment of the site with many more dwelling units than currently exist could have ramifications to traffic and view sheds in Edina. Ms. Mellom added that the City of Minneapolis made the right decision by upholding the current moratorium on new development in the area. IX. STAFF COMMENTS None XI. NEXT MEETING DATE October 9, 2012 XI1. ADJOURNMENT 8:50 p.m. Member Davis moved the meeting be adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Member Curran seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 6 n �w 4 MINUTES Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall - Community Room Monday, October I, 2012 7:00 `p.m. J. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 11. ROLL-CALL Answering roll call was, Chair Carr, and Members Stegner, Davis, Curran, Anger, Moore, Chris' daansen, Sussman,' Johnson'and "Good. Absent was Member Mellom. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Curran moved to approve,the meeting agenda. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The "motion carried. IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Certificate of Appropriateness #H -12 -3 4524 Bruce Avenue Request: Modified Plan for Certificate of Appropriateness,(COA) to demolish existing home and construct a new home and attached garage Planner Repya reported that on July 9, 2012 the Heritage Preservation Board issued a Certificate of Appropriateness approval for the construction of a new home at 4524 Bruce Avenue: The decision for approval was appealed to the City Council and heard at their August 6th meeting. The City Council approved the appeal and on August 215, adopted the following Findings in support of the approval: .1. The materials board was not presented to the Heritage Preservation Board for their consideration. 2. The proposed home's use of a non - traditional exterior material' is not appropriate because the two homes on both side of the proposed new home have real or traditional stucco. The proposed exterior siding, therefore; does. not "relate to the pattern of existing adjacent historic. home's or respect the `rhythm and continuity of similar,features along the street," as required in_ the District's Plan of Treatment. 3. The front porch, ,as proposed, is not compatible with the Country Club neighborhood. It does not "relate to the pattern of existing adjacent historic-homes or. respect the rhythm and continuity of similar features along the street," as required in the District's Plan of Treatment. .4. The size of the third -story window is not appropriate for the District. Typically, third -story windows in the District are smaller; therefore it too does not "relate to the pattern of existing adjacent historic homes or respect the rhythm and continuity of similar features along the street," as required in the District's Plan of Treatment 5. The proposed home should be redesigned and reconsidered by the Heritage Preservation Board. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes October 1, 2012 Ms. Repya explained that following the direction of the City Council, the applicant, JMS Custom Homes has submitted revised plans for a new home with attached garage. The revised plans have not changed with respect to the size, scale, and massing of the home which were found to be consistent with homes in the District and not subject to the appeal. Rather, the revised' plans reflect changes to the design identified by the City Council in their Findings in support of the appeal — namely: I . The proposed house is now clad in traditional stucco rather than the Hardi -board stucco panels, thus considerably reducing the amount of false timbering on all elevations. 2. The front porch has been removed from the plan in favor of a small covered entry that emulates the air lock entries found on many Tudor inspired homes in the District. 3. The size of the third floor window and the scale of the dormer have been reduced 4. A material board will be provided for the Heritage Preservation Board's review. Ms. Repya observed that the revised plans do a good job of addressing the issues raised in the appeal of the original plan and reflect the direction provided by the City Council in their Findings. Approval of the revised plans dated September 20, 2012 is recommended subject to the following conditions: I. Historical and architectural documentation of the existing house and garage is provided to include digital photographs and a written description of the house and its known history. 2. The home is built subject to the final approved plans — any changes must be brought back to the HPB. 3. A sign (not to exceed 6 sq. ft.) with a rendering of the approved home is displayed on the property. 4. A year built plaque is displayed on the home. S. The HPB's staff liaison is provided a final inspection of the home prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction shall be provided once the house is completed. Ms. Repya clarified that the recommendation for approval reflects the following changes made to the previously approved plan as directed by the City Council in the. Findings of Fact associated with the August 6, 2012 appeal of the COA decision: 1. The Hardi -board stucco material originally proposed for the exterior of the proposed home was replaced with traditional stucco which is appropriate and consistent with the pattern of existing adjacent historic homes. 2. The front porch was removed from the plan and replaced with a covered front entry which is compatible with the historic homes in the Country Club neighborhood. 3. The third -story window was reduced in size to typify other homes with third story windows in the District. 4. The redesigned home relates well with the pattern of existing adjacent historic homes and respects the rhythm and continuity of similar features along the street. 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes October 1, 2012 Public Comment A. Bill Jadkwoski , 4610 Bruce Avenue Mr. Jadkowski explained that his wife Kitty O'Dea was unable to attend the meeting and asked that he read the following statement she prepared: In her statement, Ms. O'Dea explained that she has been out of the country and although Ms. Repya sent her the revised plans electronically, she was unable to open the file. However, she asked that when the HPB evaluates the plan they take into consideration not only how the home is compatible with the Country Club District's Plan of Treatment, but how the home compares to other Tudor style homes as well as the surrounding homes on Bruce Avenue. In her statement, Ms. O'Dea asked the board pay particular attention to the following issues: I . Ensure that the elevation at the front door is consistent with the neighboring homes. 2. Ensure that the building materials are consistent with neighboring homes with the use of traditional stucco and natural stone is appropriate with the surrounding homes. 3. Ensure that untypical forms such as a front porch, trim in the eaves are not included, and that the window and roof forms are consistent with the surrounding homes. Ms. O'Dea's statement concluded that although she had not seen the revised plans, she would encourage the HPB to vote for approval if they are completely comfortable with the design. However if there is any doubt, she encouraged a no vote; citing that the HPB should not compromise on a home that will stand for the next 50 years and change the face of the street. B. Ann Wordelman, 4522 Bruce Avenue — Abutting neighbor to the north Ms. Wordelman asked for clarification on the following issues: 1. The plans indicate that the 3rd floor window has been reduced. What is the size of that window? • Planner Repya explained that the original window was. 17.5 square feet in area, and now the proposed window measures 13.5 square feet. • Jeff Schoenwetter, JM S Custom Homes explained that the window has been reduced to the smallest egress window available. Ms. Wordelman observed that there are no other historic homes on Bruce Avenue that have 3rd story windows facing the front fagade. New Tudor style homes built at 4602 Bruce Avenue and 4601 Drexel Avenue are very similar in design, however neither home has a 3rd story window. She added that this was not a major concern; however she wanted to make sure that everyone was comfortable with introducing this new element into the street scape. She added that natural light is provided from the windows on the south elevation of the 3rd story, thus it wouldn't be disastrous if natural light was not provided from the front fagade. 2. The plans indicate "stucco ". Is that the traditional material found on the adjacent homes to the north and south? • Matt Hanish, JMS Custom Homes responded that the home will be clad in traditional stucco similar to the homes on either side. Mr. Hanish then presented a material board which demonstrated the materials to be used on the exterior of the home. 3. The plans indicate that the material used on the building's trim is LP SmartSide, a composite wood material rather than natural wood. She recalled that at the City Council meeting the use of composite materials was called into question. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes October 1, 2012 • Ms. Repya explained that the engineered wood product has the authentic look of natural wood, but is more durable, does not absorb water, thus is resistant to warping and bug infestation. Also, paint adheres very well to this product which requires less maintenance than a natural wood product. Ms. Repya added that the engineered wood trim product is the same product approved for the new home at 4624 Bruce Avenue earlier this summer. 4. Ms. Wordelman observed that the plans demonstrate a one foot increase in the first floor elevation which will site the home close to the same elevation as her home to the north, but 2.9 feet above the home to the south. She pointed out that she wanted to be sure that everyone understood the need to increase this elevation and was comfortable with that. Ms. Wordelman concluded that she was pleased to see that traditional stucco will be used on the home, and observed that through the feedback and iterations of the process, the modified project is an improvement. C. Dan Dulas, 4609 Bruce Avenue Mr. Dulas questioned the following elements of the plan: I . Mr. Dulas questioned the height of the proposed home. Jeff Schoenwetter responded that the 31 foot height to peak of the proposed home is actually I /10th of afoot shorter than the existing home. Furthermore, the one foot increase in the first floor elevation is within the City's criteria for new construction. Mr. Dulas observed that although the peak of the existing home at 31 feet is comparable to the existing home; the mass of the proposed home at the top floor is much greater than the existing home which does not have living space on a third level, but rather the roofline comes to a sharp peak. 2. Mr. Dulas questioned where the grading and drainage from the downspouts would be directed on the property, noting that it may not be within the prevue of the Heritage Preservation Board, but he did not see where that information was provided in the plans. 3. Mr. Dulas also questioned the width of the driveway and whether the half -wall on the front elevation was positioned on the driveway. Responding to the questions of the drainage and driveway width, Jeff Schoenwetter commented that the City's Engineering Department oversees the drainage on the site which will not be directed on adjacent properties, but would be contained on the site. Addressing the proposed driveway width, Mr. Schoenwetter explained that the half -wall will not be built on the driveway, a new curb cut will not be required, and the width is proposed to be less than 12 feet which is applicable to the city codes. 4. Lastly, Mr. Dulas asked if any of the existing trees on the property would be removed. Mr. Schoenwetter explained that the boulevard trees would remain, however a silver maple in the front yard would be removed. 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes October 1, 2012 D. Bruce Leslie, 4526 Bruce Avenue — Abutting neighbor to the south Mr. Leslie explained that his home is directly south of the proposed property and he would like to thank JMS for making good faith efforts to meet the concerns of the neighbors raised at previous meetings. of the HPB and. City Council with the proposed plan. He opined that he is confident that the new home is a good thing — it will be replacing a home that does not fit in with the street scape with a new home that will fit in well with its surroundings and be good for the street and the neighborhood. Mr. Leslie concluded the he encouraged the HPB to approve the plan so the new home can be built this winter with a minimal disruption to the neighborhood. Board Member Comments A. Member Curran — Asked for a pointof clarification as to whether the previous plan had a window on the 3rd story of the front fadade. Planner Repya verified that the previous plan did have a window on the 3rd story of the front facade. Ms. Curran then commented that the revised plan reflected all of the changes'the City Council identified; she appreciated that, and thanked JMS for that follow- through. B. Member Stegner — Mr. Stegner agreed with Ms. Curran commenting that the applicant has done a good job of responding to the changes to the plans that were outlined by the City Council. C. Member Moore — Mr. Moore concurred that the proposed plan did a good job of addressing the direction provided by the City Council. He added that he liked the proposed home - particularly the stone work, and found the new rendition to be a great improvement. D. Member Anger — Mr. Anger thanked JMS for the plan revisions and the neighbors for their comments. E. Member Sussman — Mr. Sussman commented that the plans have improved in several ways and the changes responded to the direction provided by the City Council. He added that he is a new member of the HPB, and understands that the board has previously approved plans for new homes using alternative products. He wondered for future reference if the use of Hardi -board products would be viable product in the Country Club District. Member Curran responded that.the Plan of Treatment specifesahat. non- traditio,nal�products,should be evaluated on a case - by -case basis. In this case, the City Council deemed the�;Hardi- board stucco panels to be inappropriate — that decision would not apply district - wide., F. Member Christiaansen — Ms. Christiaansen thanked JMS for all of their hard work and efforts. The revised plan meets the Plan of Treatment the HPB is required to look at when reviewing new homes, and addressed the City Council's direction and would be a good addition to the streetscape. G. Member Davis - Mr. Davis stated that he voted for approval of the initial home and feels very good about voting in favor of this home too. JMS has done an outstanding job of addressing the City Council's concerns, and this home will be a nice addition to the Country Club District. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes October 1, 2012 H. Member Johnson — Mr. Johnson commented that he had no questions about the revised plans. He agrees with the other board member's comments and finds the home to be very beautiful. I. Member Carr — Chair Carr concurred with the comments of her fellow board members, adding her opinion that the plan's revisions addressed the direction given by the City Council, and provide for a home that will be compatible with the surrounding historic homes. Ms. Carr also wished to thank the developer for the hard work they put into the project; and the neighbors for providing their input on the project. She pointed out that heritage preservation is a collaborative community effort and the input from the neighborhood and City Council is important and greatly appreciated. Motion & Vote Member Davis moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness application for the revised plans dated September 20, 2012 subject to the following conditions: I. Historical and architectural documentation of the existing house and garage is provided to include digital photographs and a written description of the house and its known history. 2. The home is built subject to the final approved plans — any changes must be brought back to the HPB. 3. A sign (not to exceed 6 sq. ft.) with a rendering of the approved. home is displayed on the property. 4. A year built plaque is displayed on the home. 5. The HPB's staff liaison is provided a final inspection of the home prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 6. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction shall be provided once the house is completed. Member Stegner seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS A. Chair Carr — MN Preservation Conference, Fergus Falls — Sept. 13 & 14 Chair Carr reported that she, Planner Repya and Member Sussman attended the annual State Preservation Conference in Fergus Falls, September 13th and 14th. There was great information provided on sustainable building practices, grant programs available, preservation marketing, as well as an archaeological canoe trip. Ms. Carr pointed out that of particular interest was the old State Hospital for the Medically Insane located in Fergus Falls which is currently owned by the city and considered one of Minnesota's endangered historic structures. The hospital known as Kirkbride, after the doctor who designed the building in the 1800's is a magnificent structure which originally sat on 600 acres, and was self - sustaining. Ms. Carr added that some of the presentations will be available online, and more information will be provided at the regular October 96 meeting next week. 7 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes October 1, 2012 B. Member Stegner— 125th Anniversary Meeting Kick -Off, Thursday, October 4th Member Stegner reported that there will be a kick -off meeting of the 125th Anniversary Committee this coming Thursday, October 4th from 5:00 — 7:00 pm at Braemar Club House. VII. STAFF COMMENTS - None VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE October 9, 2012 IX. ADJOURNMENT 8:15 p.m. Member Curran moved the meeting be adjourned at 8: 15 p.m. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya r� 4 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL September 11, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm II. WELCOME NEW STUDENT MEMBERS The student members were not in attendance. III. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson John O'Leary arrived at 7:37pm IV. APPROVAL OFMEETINGAGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: -. Dan Peterson; Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto; Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn- Peterson - Motion Carried V. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approval of Minutes — Retreat meeting on Monday, August 13, 2012 Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT Ann Larson, 5025 Lincoln Circle, informed the Park Board she was bitten by a dog at the Edina Dog Park in June because the owner in question was not paying attention to his dog as well as his dog was not under voice control which it states in the rules. She stated that the owner did not have a dog collar for his dog and in fact did not have any identification tags. She explained the owner was on his cell phone half -way across the park with his back turned to, the dog when the dog bit her in the forearm. She informed the Park Board she had to get a series of rabies shots because the owner's dog did not have updated shots. She pointed out this raises some issues that have been ongoing at the park in terms of it does not seem like the park is really policed and rules are not being followed. In addition, there are a lot of people using the park that are not paying for it as well as there is a lot of dog poop that owners are not picking up. Herb Anderson, 3 Wellesly Place, informed the Park Board that people who do not belong in the dog park are using it and telling their friends because they know it is not being policed anymore and it really is getting out of hand. He asked if there could be better rules and perhaps put a flyer in with the notice when it's time to renew the dog license collars and also saying if you don't pick up after your dog(s) you won't be allowed in the park. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. August 13, 2012 Park Board Retreat Review Member Jones indicated she thought the retreat was a great event; however, it was different from what she had expected. She noted that they never discussed the surveys they filled out and asked if they will be given a time to do that. She commented if they were just going to brainstorm a work plan she would have never suggested the meeting not be televised because the public does have every right to hear them brainstorm and discuss a work plan. Member Jacobson stated that she also wished they could have reviewed the survey results and figure out how they could work more efficiently together because a lot of times she feels they are on different pages and if they could figure out how to corral that into an efficient meeting it would help all of them. Member Segreto explained since it was originally her idea it really was her intent to work on interpersonal communications but, with all due respect, unless you really are skilled in that field or had some professional assistance from outside it really would be hard for a chairperson to do. She commented that she would like to do that and they do have the survey to work with. She stated it was a productive meeting; however, it wasn't what her expectation was. Chair Steel replied they certainly can do that moving forward; however, it is a little frustrating because she did present the agenda in advance and she thought it was pretty clear. She noted they can put this on the agenda for discussion at a future meeting. Member Jones responded she is not sure what they would be discussing because it sounds like this is something that is not possible to do without a facilitator; therefore, maybe they could bring in a facilitator and plan it as a non - televised meeting. She added that she doesn't want them to waste their time filling out a survey and then do nothing with it and asked Ms. Kattreh if she could find out if there is someone on staff who could provide some kind of facilitating. Member Hulbert responded he thought that is what they originally had asked for and were told no. Member Segreto replied that is correct, when she first brainstormed the idea with Mr. Keprios he said they had never done something like that before and really didn't have the budget for it. She commented that maybe this is something they could do next summer and maybe they could get a budget line to have a facilitator help them. Chair Steel clarified that each question on the survey was taken into consideration and after meeting. with Ms. Kattreh and Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, they identified'what they felt were the key issues. While interpersonal relationships is certainly a component there are other components they felt were more important to impacting their work right now which is they need to have a work plan turned in tomorrow. Therefore, if the Park Board doesn't understand their role they are not going to be able to function so she did have to make 'a decision to prioritize but going forward they can continue to look at" the other components to make them more effective. Member Deeds indicated that he thought the retreat was good and the only change he would make in the future is that there be no "block voting "'because it becomes a little biased: VII.B. 2013 Park Board Work Plan — Keeya Steel, Chairperson Chair Steel informed the Park Board that she worked with Mr. Keprios and Ms. Kattreh on this and that she would like to go through it item by item. "Strategic Planning with a Comprehensive Needs Assessment" - Chair Steel indicated that she thought it was apparent that they need more strategic planning throughout their activities and that this item would most comprehensively include the different questions they had at the Park Board retreat. She stated that she really didn't think it made sense to start new programming without having a strategic plan and a needs assessment before investing money into specific programs or facilities. 2 "Edina Senior Center" - Chair Steel explained the reason she did not include this under the Strategic Plan is because it's looking at existing data and this has already been talked about and has a $900 budget. Member Segreto asked what is the $900 based upon to which Ms. Kattreh replied that is something Mr. Keprios put together and she does not have the answer but will find out. Member Hulbert commented he believes former Park Board Member Bill Lough was very interested in this and maybe they could reach out to him and see if he has the desire to have community involvement with the study of the Edina Senior Center. Chair Steel replied it does state under Park Board duties it includes former working groups or committees and therefore feels communicating that to him would be very valuable. Member Jacobson stated she has one tangential question on the Edina Center Study: is it more about the use of the building when it's not in use as a Senior Center or is it about the Senior Center activities or both? Chair Steel replied she believes both. Member Jones commented that she would like to add parking to the study. "Cost Recovea Goals for Enterprise Facilities" - Chair Steel stated they did pass a recommendation asking City Council that they study this again. She pointed out there is an overlap with the Strategic Plan in everything they will be doing because it will be comprehensive. However, this will be a little different because again they are looking at existing data and also one of the items mentioned at the retreat was classification and therefore thinks that also plays into this initiative. She commented that she believes the recommendation they passed to the City Council has not been acted on yet and that once the "Work Plan" goes to City Council they will have a chance to review it. Member Jones asked if they could add a discussion of what makes something an enterprise facility, what are the principles and maybe it should include enterprise budgets, statistics and business plans to which Member Deeds added criteria classification. Member Kathryn Peterson commented that was the point of the classification to try to make head or tail of what is or is not considered an enterprise. Member Dan Peterson stated that with respect to cost recovery they need to know what is the cost to keep it going and how many people use it and how many people they need to use it in order to recover the cost; however, he is not sure if those numbers are available. Chair Steel indicated that right now it says "review enterprise facility budget" and doesn't know if that's sufficient. "New Initiatives" - Chair Steel explained there were a few more items added and under the "Ongoing Responsibilities" they have their CIP but Scott Neal expressed that he would like articulated separately and she was informed by staff that these are necessary to include. She added all of these items will be addressed in 2013. "Renovate Garden Park Baseball Field Initiative" - Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board this initiative was brought forth by the Edina Baseball Association. There are some fields that they would like to see improved and first on their list is Garden Park and the plan is for the City to partner• with the EBA. The EBA is offering a $100,000 donation and the City is applying for a grant for approximately $260,000 through Hennepin County Youth Sports. If they receive funding this is a project they will be working on and there will be action in the form of a public hearing in October. If everything passes they will begin working on the project in 2013. "Barrier Free Replacement Playground Equipment at Wooddale Park Initiative" - Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board this initiative was brought to them by an Edina resident who lives in the neighborhood and is interested in putting together a fundraising campaign to replace the playground equipment with a completely barrier play structure. She noted they are anticipating a budget of approximately $300,000 and they do have some matching funds that they can put in their CIP for 2013. She noted this is an addition to this year but they are looking at it as being completely done by the neighborhood's fundraising effort. She added they are in the very preliminary stages right now but anticipate it being more of an initiative in 2013 as well. - "Lake Edina Pathway Initiative" - Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board this is an initiative that came about in conjunction with "Do Town" as well as interest by some City Council members in an attempt to try to bridge the Parklawn neighborhood and Cornelia School. This will give kids in that neighborhood a safe route to access the school and the playground. She noted it was added to the 2013 CIP and is something that will take place in the form of a public hearing with the neighborhood. "Countryside Park Master Plan" — Ms. Kattreh indicated they have been working on this for over a year and are getting very close to completing a master plan. She indicated they will be asking Park Board to review and comment on a play structure to which they've been working on the design for several months. She noted that Member Hulbert has volunteered to serve on the committee to replace the shelter building. Member Jones asked where the one million dollar budget on that item came from. Ms. Kattreh replied they had $330,000-in their CIP for this year to replace the playground equipment and pathways. In addition, they received $6951'000 in a park dedication fee from the "Waters Development" which is the reason they are able to move forward with the entire master plan. "Ongoing Responsibilities ". - Chair Steel informed the Park Board they have a list of ongoing responsibilities which. basically are annual duties as well as a list of work plan ideas to be considered in the future: CIP, Fees and Charges; Donations Policy, Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy, User Fee Policy, 2014 -2015 Operating Budget, Edina-Veteran's- Memorial, Update Bylaws,- Election -of Officers and the 2014 Park Board Work Plan. "Other Work Plan Ideas'.Considered for Current Year or Future Years" — Chair Steel informed the Park Board of the following other work plan ideas: Cooperative Agreement with the School District; Sports Dome and the Masters Parks Plan, which again had interest from City Council. Member Deeds.indicated that being a part of the Sports Dome Committee he would like to see it come to a conclusion and would like to see it somewhere on the Work Plan with a deadline date and get it done. He stated they need to find a location and make a decision, pick a date and get a plan to present to the Park Board and then move it on to the City Council rather than have it on the "Other Work Plan Ideas ". Ms. Kattreh responded the reason it was put on the Work Plan is because it's titled "New Initiatives" and this is more of a current year initiative.- She stated that she totally agrees and maybe it's a matter of keeping it where it is with a final date; however,,they certainly can move it to the "New Initiative" section as well. Member Deeds stated that he would like to see a general timeframe where.there will be a recommendation, review and comment on the Sports Dome on a calendar. Chair Steel replied the Park Board will have a chance to review the calendar but the idea of this is to make sure that the City Council is in agreement with their initiatives. Member Jones indicated they have several initiatives that are going on right now that they hope to have completed and the Sports Dome is one of them. She stated that in looking at "Ongoing Responsibilities" she would like some clarification that the Donations and Naming Policy Working Group is not considered- ongoing because she thought they were done so likewise there will be expectations of their involvement in the future. Therefore, she would not recommend them to be on their Work Plan. Chair Steel replied that is a good point and suggested that they be put under "Ongoing Responsibilities" and move the Sports Dome into that as well and after each item write "completed by such date ". Member Jones indicated that they are different than "Ongoing Responsibilities" such as the CIP, fees and charges, operating budget, bylaws and election of officers. 4 Member Kathryn Peterson asked if they could put an item under "Ongoing Responsibilities" that says "Policy Review as needed ". Chair Steel replied she doesn't think that speaks to the Sports Dome and . suggested adding a new, category. "Ongoing Initiatives ". Members Jones commented that she thinks the target completion dates are good and she likes the form for the "New Initiatives" but she would cut, the word "New" out of there for the other initiatives like the Sports Dome. Chair Steel asked if it is the general consensus that the Donations and Naming Policy, User Fee Policy and Sports Dome are initiatives that should be completed in 2013 to which Member Deeds replied he thought -some of those were completed. Chair Steel replied that the City Council will continue to work on the Donations and_Namirg.Policy with the Park Board and the City Council did pass the User Fee Policy. However, if they start receiving new data they will need to work on the policy. Member Jones indicated that regarding the "Edina Veterans Memorial Committee" she would suggest they open it up`again to have a Park Board member be a representative on that committee and find out if there is going to be a target completion date or is it going to,be. ongoing forever. Chair Steel °replied that she thinks having it on the Work Plan is sufficient for being able.to talk about it; however when they start discussing the calendar they will try to get those specifics regarding the memorial. Member Jones commented on the "Master Parks Plan" for the "Other Park Plan Ideas" she considers it to be something similar to the Strategic Planning and Comprehensive Needs Assessment and therefore would like to put it under the first Initiative. Chair Steel replied she thinks it's a little different and asked Ms. Kattreh to explain what a "Master Parks Plan" looks like. Ms. Kattreh explained the difference with the "Master Parks Plan" would be an actual study of each park facility itself and its uses and possible modifications. She explained the "Strategic Plan" is looking at their operations, programming and how it relates to the economy today as well as how it relates to our vision and mission statements. The . Master Parks Plan being very park facility specific and the other more operational mission and vision related. Member Deeds asked if Countryside Park already has a master plan and therefore this is just a plan that is moving forward on a plan that exists, correct? Ms. Kattreh replied yes and added they are able to move forward with that plan because of the Park Dedication fee from the "Waters Development". Member Jones indicated that she has a different definition of a "Master Parks Plan". For example,. there is a master plan for Countryside Park in existence and there is a master plan in existence for Garden Park; however, other communities create Master Parks Plan and showed the Park Board two examples of Master Parks plan from other communities. One community is a city in Illinois with similar demographics to Edina and in it they talk about a needs assessment and they talk a little bit about a strategic plan -and it's all a part of the Master Parks Plan. It takes a ten year vision of where they want to be and looks at all of their facilities. She stated the other city she looked at was Roseville and they do have the aspects of what goes on in each individual park but it's a broader strategic plan. She stated that with these two master plans, since they incorporate the "strategic plan and the needs assessment, they talk about the process those cities used in order to create a needs assessment in order -to create the strategic plan and that might be a good tool for them as they work on the first work plan. She noted she would ask staff to say if there are other cities that have similar things. She commented that sometimes she feels like she is developing knowledge of how to create the mechanics of something so that they can advise on policy when in fact there are many different cities that have tried to do the same thing that we've done and we might figure out how that fits. She noted she would suggest as they move forward this may be something for them to consider. Chair Steel asked Member Jones if she is suggesting seeing a "Strategic Master Parks Plan" instead of a "Strategic Plan" to which Member Jones replied yes, a "Master Parks Plan" which would include strategic planning and comprehensive needs assessment. Chair Steel noted she could be wrong but she doesn't think the Parks Plan usually includes the enterprise facilities because it's looked at differently. Ms. Kattreh pointed out that she thinks they are arguing over semantics because she has seen different plans called different things but thinks it's very important that you are specific about what it is that you want. For example, are you looking for a master plan like you've seen 5 for Countryside Park, where they are creating a more efficient facility or are they looking at something more general such as this is what you want to see at the park and this is how it relates to the recreation and sport programs as a whole. It could include enterprises or not include enterprises, it really is a scope that would be determined by you because all master plans are done differently and called different things so it depends on the scope you want to see so if there is something you want done in one year or in multiple phases you need to determine what the key points are that you will be looking for immediately in 2013. Member Segreto stated that she is really weary of spending lots of money on a consultant for an independent study on master plans. She indicated that while she supports a strategic plan for them to understand and sort through what their strategy is for a five year period she is really not a proponent. She commented that in looking at the plan that was just circulated it's so full of just statistics that they will have yet another thing on the shelf and she has full confidence in Edina Parks staff to work with the strategic plan that the Park Board comes up with. She added they could use the money that they would spend on their planning process and put into their parks. Member Jones indicated she thinks they need to clarify if they're looking at a five or ten year plan and what are the objectives. She agrees they need to begin with a comprehensive needs assessment and strategic plan and see where they go from there. Chair Steel responded she thinks they are getting a little ahead of themselves on whether they want a five year strategic plan that's going to cover these facilities and will have this level of detail because that is going to take some discussion. Member Jones asked if they can look at adding anything to the Work Plan because she believes the City Council consensus was reached regarding the Grandview process on the following: Park Board to address community needs, use of public spaces, and specific building programming which would drive building design. Chair Steel responded that she has included that under the Strategic Plan under rationale it states "Park Board has shown interest in needs assessment including but limited to nature programming, winters activities and then the Grandview Community Center programming/amenities ". She stated that by making sure they do a needs assessment they are including all of the items that are coming up. Member Jones stated that she sees the target completion date is "ongoing" so this is a small area plan where the City Council would like to have some guidance so that they can develop that area. Therefore, she would recommend that they get a target completion date because it appears the Park Board is to address the community needs, the use of public spaces and civic building programming which would drive the building design. Member Jones stated she thinks that they would need either to have that as a separate item under the work plan or just a target completion date for the needs assessment. Member Deeds asked if we want Grandview cut out as a separate item because you think it's more eminent time wise. Member Jones replied maybe and maybe the City Council will say it's not, she would just like some clarity. Chair Steel noted that she is hesitant and it depends if they decide to do an internal needs assessment or not. Member Deeds suggested they ask the City Council for some guidance on what their time frame looks like for Grandview. Ms. Kattreh indicated that the September 19`h meeting has a work session and if Park Board would like to add Grandview then she would suggest adding it as a new initiative if you would like to give them some verbiage for that. The City Council can then decide whether they want to keep it or choose to eliminate it. Chair Steel indicated that her only reservation about adding it as a separate item is because she doesn't want to spend money on a needs assessment and then do another needs assessment. Member Jones replied she thinks that was quite clear that they are looking at consolidating and potentially what it is that they might need in that space and how it might all fit together in a comprehensive needs assessment. She would never recommend there be more than one needs assessment. Chair Steel asked would it be sufficient under rationale to write "address" and then the language "City Council's action" to which Member Jones replied she thinks that would be great. 6 Member Dan Peterson indicated that he believes a few weeks ago the City Council copied emails to the Park Board regarding community gardens and noted that two or three years ago he tried to get the Park Board interested in that issue and there was no interest. He stated they are the only city in the western suburbs that does not have a community garden. He commented that the easy way to get going on, it is to see where the need would be the greatest and that is around Centennial Lakes with all of the apartments and condominiums. He noted that he thought the YMCA has some land which Mr. Keprios thought could be used just across York. He commented if staff could figure out what's going on at the YMCA and let the Park Board know in the next couple of months. Chair Steel asked Ms. Kattreh what the City Council has done recently as far as community gardens. Ms. Kattreh replied there have been some discussions particularly related to "Do Town" about community gardens but they haven't received any specific directives. Member Jones commented that she agrees that keeps coming up and most likely is going to be part of a needs assessment. She asked are they really going to say the needs assessment is going to take place this year and they will move forward with it next year. She stated that she thinks it's worth discussing whether or not they want to try to move faster on this. She noted that she is a little surprised this hasn't ended up in their work plan because there seems to be many initiatives that weren't even part of their CIP last year and not even part of the five year CIP and she feels very reactionary. Member Hulbert indicated that he thinks they always have the ability to add things as the year progresses, he thinks they always have flexibility if the time would permit. Chair Steel suggested adding it under "Other Work Plan Ideas ". Chair Steel informed the Park Board that she agrees with Member Jones about the CIP items and she also had the same conversation with staff but some of the items are already supported by City Council. Member Jones commented that she is very excited about some of the things they have added but does get a little frustrated because it seems as if they are constantly reacting to the next thing to which Chair Steel replied she feels the same way. Member Jones informed the Park Board of one more idea she had and that is to talk about Green Energy and try to add that to the work plan. She explained that other cities are becoming very active in working with third parties and/or creating solar community gardens which would work for a community like Edina. She pointed out Minneapolis has been able to save $14,000 a year in electricity and considering what their arena burns in electricity she would like to at least evaluate some other methods of green energy. Member Segreto asked if it would be more appropriate for the Energy and Environment Commission to work on to which Member Jones replied she thinks it would be a great thing for them to work together on and the savings could go towards the parks. Member Segreto commented that programmatically should they not be the spear leader on the effort. Member. Jones replied she is just saying if it's parkland, then it is something that she thinks they should be involved in and maybe they could suggest a joint work group. Member Jones pointed out that when looking at reducing cost for the enterprise facilities and when they look at how much energy is burned heating the ice arena, etc., none of their work plan programs' have really tried to target a reduction in cost. Strategic Planninz With a Comprehensive Needs Assessment Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to accept the initiative "Strategic Planning with a Comprehensive Needs Assessment" and add under rationale "address City Council's actions on the Grandview Area - Plan ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried. Edina Senior Center Study Chair Steel commented that Member Jones made the suggestion to add "Parking" under proposed changes on the Park Board duties. 7 Member Dan Peterson indicated he does not understand why it is on the agenda because it seems to him it is not broken. Member Deeds replied that they discussed last year that the utilization is extremely low as well as have very dow.utilization.rates and the cost that they are running relative to utilization is quite high. Therefore, he thinks there is a good indication that they need to figure out a better use for the space and believes that is the rationale for it, there is good evidence that it needs to be looked at. Member Jacobson commented that she wishes it would state that in the Park Board duties because it sounds more like it's trying to look at the Senior Center as a.whole and not utilizing the capacity or the potential income for the building. Member Jacobson made a motion, seconded by Hulbert to add the statement of "increase the utilization of the building ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke to approve the initiative itself. Member Jones. stated.-she is trying to figure out how many working groups they are assigning themselves right now; she would like to get a tally of what is ongoing and what they have just approved. She added they need to be clear and a good thing about creating a work plan is now they will be intentional about what they'ask each other to do."' She noted they have the "Sports Dome Committee" that is going to-. continue work this year and asked if there are any others that are ongoing. Member Deeds asked about the "Naming and Donations" to which Member Jones replied they are pretty much done, there is one more meeting. Member Jones stated they have the_Sports Dome and the Senior Center and asked 'if the "strategic planning" is going to be a working group to which Chair Steel replied no; that will be the full Park Board. Member Deeds commented that is going to be a lot of working groups and would guess -will take anywhere from one to three years because. if you do a good job on a strategic plan it will take a` lot of time, energy, effort and a lot of data collection. They are not going to be able to do it as one massive board so there is a lot under that one initiative there. Member Jones commented that she thinks that alone will be a board task. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Cost Recovery Goals for Enterprise Facilities There was a suggestion to add in 'criteria for classification. Member Hulbert made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson to approve the initiative Cost Recovery Goals for Enterprise Facilities. Member Deeds indicated as they start stacking up what they are putting forward as initiatives for 2013 that's a lot of work. He knows this "probably needs to be done but these are some big projects and asked is this a 2013 project or a 2014 project. Member Kathryn Peterson suggested they push out the completion date. Member Deeds commented that he thinks they need to think about prioritization a little bit because they all have jobs and lives. Chair Steel asked is there a preferred completion date. Member Dan Peterson stated that he thinks this is a very important study and: he doesn't seethe economy getting any better for anyone quickly and feels the City Council is going to have to come to grips with can we afford to do this stuff that doesn't pay their own way. He suggested they all give it some thought and let Ms. Kattreh or Mr. Keprios know what we think should be the elements of the study and put that in writing and then talk about it in three or four months. He asked is this something that needs to be done in the next 12 months. Member Kathryn Peterson suggested making the completion date June of 2014. 8 Member Kathryn Peterson made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to change the completion date to June 2014. Amendment Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Amendment carried. Motion to approve the initiative. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Renovate Garden Park Baseball Field Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to approve the initiative to renovate Garden Park Baseball Field. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Barrier Free Replacement Plawround Equipment — Wooddale Park ry Member Kathryn Peterson asked if this is strictly for the replacement of the tot lot area as opposed to any other improvements or changes to the park to which Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct. Member Jones stated there are many playgrounds that are quite old and there is a replacement schedule for those and asked if this is when it would normally be replaced or are they moving ahead of others. - - -Ms. Kattreh -- replied -it is moving approximately eight years -ahead of the normal- replacement schedule.. -- which is why they are asking for the fundraising campaign. Member Jones asked if it is similar to the "Hornet's Nest" that unless a certain amount of funds are raised the City will not replace it ahead of time. Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct but they have not yet had those discussions or a recommendation from the Park Board or City Council to say they need to raise 100% and she is hoping to get some involvement from the Park Board to help with that but at this point they are hoping for a 100% contribution in fundraising. Member Kathryn Peterson asked in the context of providing a barrier free playground has there been any discussion about which park might be best suited to do that. Ms. Kattreh replied those are some discussions they've had with the neighbors and as staff. She pointed out that at this point because of the proximity to the home of the person that is spearheading this campaign Wooddale Park is the primary focus. She noted they did discuss other parks in Edina and it might be something that with the involvement with the Park Board they may want to do at other park locations as well. Member Deeds asked if they currently have any barrier free playground places or is this a new addition to which Ms. Kattreh replied this would be a new addition to the playgrounds in Edina; there currently is no completely barrier'free. playground equipment in Edina. Member Kathryn Peterson asked if barrier free parks .will bring in.people from outside the city and might there be parking issues as a result. Ms. Kattreh replied those are some discussions that they've had and thinks they would see people coming in from outside Edina but they definitely want to keep the neighborhood park feel and don't want to overrun the parking or the neighborhood so they are definitely going to keep it at a scale that will be very reasonable for that park. Member Jones indicated that this is the first time she has heard of this project and it sounds like a wonderful project but if this passes as part of the work plan does that mean it's part of the CIP budget. Ms. Kattreh replied they did put a dollar amount in the CIP budget that you will be looking at and the City Council will have an opportunity to approve later in the year. Ms. Kattreh commented that Member Jones talked about being reactionary at times and as staff they also feel that they are being very reactionary but she tries to look at that in a positive mode. She noted they listen to what the residents are D asking for and they hope to be able to act and respond in a timely manner. In this case where they have someone that might be looking at making a $200,000 or $300,000 donation to improve a park eight to ten years ahead of time may be viewed as ,reactionary but as staff they look at it as they are trying to be proactive to what the residents are requesting. Chair Steel pointed out that they want to be careful when they are wording their initiatives that they are not approving the specific project they are just getting it on their calendar. Ms. Kattreh commented that to completely answer Member Jones question you are not approving a dollar amount and in this case they put a $300,000 budget just to give an idea of what they think the entire project might cost but believes they put $100,000 in the CIP for the project but are thinking the whole project may cost $300,000. Member Deeds commented that he would like to speak in favor of putting this on because he thinks with the improvement and barrier free that is being talked about it is going to become an ADA issue and thinks you are either going to need to do it or get sued because it's going to become an access issue and they might as well be in front of it. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to approve the initiative Barrier Free Replacement Playground. Equipment at Wooddale Park... Member. Jones made an amendment to• he motion, seconded by Member. Hulbert, to add "Park Board will:be,asked.to review and comment on design and hold standard public notice ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel,` Deeds,'Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Amendment came. Motion to approve, Initiative Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Lake Edina Pathway Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to approve the initiative. Lake Edina Pathway as one of the 2013 new initiatives. Ayes: Dan.Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Countryside Park Master Plan Member.Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, to approve the initiative Countryside ParkMaster Plan as one of the 2013 new initiatives. Member Dan Peterson asked staff to.give some thought to what percentage of new playground equipment should be barrier free and to let them know at a future meeting. Ms. Kattreh replied this is going to be their first playground that they are going to be putting in a completely poured in place safety surface so that it will be 100% accessible. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried._ OnQoinz Responsibilities Chair Steel identified the "Ongoing Responsibilities" are: CIP, fees and charges, operating budget, bylaws, election of officers and the work plan. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to approve the Ongoing Responsibilities. 10 Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Creatine a New Cateeory Chair Steel indicated they talked about creating a new category "Ongoing Initiatives" which would include: Donations and Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy, User Fee Policy, Edina Veterans Memorial and Sports Dome. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to approve the "Ongoing Initiatives ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Other Work Plan Ideas Considered for Current Year or Future Years Ms. Kattreh explained both Creek Valley School and Cornelia School have property lines that are unusual because there is school use on city property and there is city use of ball fields on school property. Historically this has been a handshake agreement but they would like to firm up these relationships in a more formal agreement so they know what is going on, what they can and cannot do, as well as possibly discuss field improvements and those sorts of things. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, to approve the Cooperative Agreement with School District for use, upgrade and maintenance of Creek Valley Park athletic fields and Cornelia School Park athletic fields. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Master Parks Plan Member Segreto stated she thinks they are all in agreement and they just passed that the Strategic Planning would be part of the "2013 New Initiative" on the work plan; however, she wants to make sure they are not trying to create what was just handed out. She thinks Ms. Kattreh said it perfectly that it could be a matter of semantics so she is not in favor of that kind of planning, it's overwhelming. Chair Steel explained that the rationale behind this is the City Council expressed interest in a Masters Parks Plan. Member Segreto suggested they should wait until the City Council gives them an official direction if that is what they want them to do. Member Jones stated she has a separate opinion on this. She explained they have a schedule so they are able to tell neighborhoods that in so many years they are going to get a new swing set and this is the type of strategic planning; however, the Master Parks Plan is a little more detailed and feels it is something Edina could use. Member Hulbert indicated that his impression of what Member Jones handed out was different than what the Master, Parks Plan is that the Park Board is being asked to approve. Chair Steel stated that she really thinks it comes down to what you make it. Member Deeds commented that he thinks what they are talking about is if they put a strategic plan together it's going to set forth goals, visions and what it is they think Edina should have in terms of amenities, etc., going forward over the next decade. He noted the Master Parks Plan then follows as the implementation. How is it they are going to achieve these goals; specifically what are they going to do with the parks they have as well as what new things are needed and it begins to go into more detail. Member Deeds pointed out that the only challenge with this is you have to have the first one done well before they can do the second one. Member Dan Peterson commented that he thinks they need further background with what the City Council is thinking about. 11 New Items Suggested Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to put Community Gardens on the agenda. Member Hulbert indicated that he thought there was some potential land use around the YMCA that could potentially be used for a community garden and thinks a lot of people would like it and so if it is a possibility he would like to see it explored. Member Deeds asked what is specifically being proposed; is it proposing working group? Member Hulbert replied he thinks it should be on the "Ongoing Responsibilities" and have staff give updates as to what is going,on with the land by the YMCA. In addition, see if there is a possibility they could enter into an agreement so they could have a discussion as to whether or not it would be feasible to put in a community garden. Member Dan Peterson suggested they put this on their November agenda because Mr. Keprios will be back and he can give them the current status. Chair Steel made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to include this item under "Other Work Plan ideas ". Member Dan Peterson accepted the friendly motion so they could vote once. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. Member Jones commented that she has been thinking about what Member Segreto has said about Energy and Environment and so her motion would be that she would suggest that they put it under "Other Work Plan Ideas" considered for current year or future year and suggest that they somehow ask the Energy and Environment Commission if they would be willing to co -chair a work group to pursue that. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to add a working group with the Edina Energy and Environment Commission to talk about green energy assessment and implementation in the parks. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Gieseke, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion carried. VIII. WELCOME NEW STUDENT MEMBER — Chair Steel welcomed the new student, John O'Leary, who then gave the Park Board some information about himself. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Ms. Kattreh indicated there is one letter that has been placed in front of the Park Board members. X. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Jones informed the Park Board that the City Council did hear the Naming and Donations Policy because they basically said it was something that was too complicated to take into consideration during a meeting and would prefer to discuss it at the December work session. Chair Steel informed the Park Board that she presented the User Fee Policy to the City Council and they pretty much accepted the recommendations in the interest of collecting data, and they may take another look at it. Member Deeds asked where they stand on the Sports Dome location. Ms. Kattreh replied they have been working with Creek Valley Church and have had discussions on their site and thinks at this point they have enough information to be able to report back to the group so she will be scheduling a meeting soon. 12 Member Hulbert commented that in regards to the letter they received regarding adding baskets for disc golf he would ask that staff touch base. with Tom Horwath, City Forester, first because it does scar up those old trees and is not sure what it will do to the health of those old trees. Ms. Kattreh replied that does bring up another point in that they receive requests like this on a regular basis and Mr. Keprios and she had talked about wanting the Park Board to come up with a very specific policy and procedure on how they would like staff to address these concerns. She noted even if there was a policy on the website where if someone has a request or there is something they would like to see in the park that there is paperwork that would need to be filled out, there is a petition that needs to be signed and explain the process that will need to be gone through with the Park Board. This is something they would like the Park Board to consider. XI. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that in front of them is a resolution that they will pass on to the City Council next week as part of their Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant. She explained that they need to have the City Council pass this resolution which essentially states they have the ability to staff and the funding to be able to maintain the field at Garden Park that they are requesting funds for. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that the Hornet's Nest project is moving along very smoothly and they are still on track for an early December opening date. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that regarding the golf dome they are working with RJM as a construction manager and they are in the process of determining what they need in a new golf dome and they are putting together some figures. She explained once they have a building plan and some figures in place they will go back to the insurance company to work on negotiating those fees. She stated that they are not going to be able to have the golf dome open for this golf season but that the opening date is anticipated for October of 2013. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 pm 13 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUILDING CONSTRUCTION BOARD COMMUNITY ROOM JULY 23, 2012 7:30AM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Sean Wenham called the meeting of the Edina Building Construction Board to order at 7:30 AM. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Sean Wenham, Eric Strobel, Scott Busyn, Pete Simpson Members Absent: None City Staff Present: Chief Building Official Steve Kirchman, Environmental Health Spec Solvei Wilmot, Permit Tech Jackie Onischuk, Fire Chief Marty Scheerer Guests: Applicant DeeDee Drays, Neighbors Martin and Dona Freeman (5537 Woodcrest Dr), Ann Marie Rogers(5541 Woodcrest Dr) III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes Member Strobel moved approval of the minutes of March 23, 2012 with member Busyn 2 "d. All voted aye motioned carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS City Environment Health Specialist Solvei Wilmot noted that City Code 450.25 requires a fence around the pool at 5633 Woodcrest Dr and does not provide for a variance. The applicant, DeeDee Drays is looking at the creek as an alternate which would have to meet or exceed the fencing requirements. The creek bed itself when it is dry is not adequate enough to meet these requirements. Vegetation as a barrier can be trimmed, cut or die off and is not a substitute for fencing. Fencing on the neighbor's property does not complete the enclosure of the Drays.property, someone can wander into this property. For these reasons Wilmot has denied the applicant's request to use Minnehaha Creek as a fence for her pool. Wilmot showed photos of the property which were included in the packet. These 4. Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 photos were taken 2011 when the creek was low. When the building permit packet was submitted approved plans included the fence. Drays has now come back and wishes to not include the fence but to get approval for using the Minnehaha Creek as the fence line. Wilmot went on with more pictures explaining the issues relative to the request. Concerns of hers were life and safety issues on having children wandering into property when creek is low. Member Simpson questioned if we have helped others in similar situations. Wilmot said no. Simpson asked about the boulders on property being considered as fencing. Wilmot said that it would not be considered as a fence because they are climbable. Simpson asked who had more authority over the Creek - the Watershed District or the City. Building Official Steve Kirchman noted that the Watershed District regulates the creek, and if they don't allow fencing a certain distant from the creek then the fence or some other method for surrounding the pool must be in place. The Watershed and City have different rules and he doesn't know which agency trumps the other in this case. Member Strobel asked what the set back was from creek. Kirchman said typical setback is 50' for structures, but doesn't know if fences are considered structures by the MCWD. Chair Wenham asked if the City contacted MCWD. Kirchman said that we did not. Wenham noted that if we were to follow the code exactly, (on the enclosed survey) it would be the green line which would be her property line there would have to be 4' fence around the entire pool area but the fence can also be put around the entire property. Is there a rule on where fence can be put in relation to the creek? Wilmot said that it would be have to be around that whole area but could be just around the pool. Wenham asked if a 4' fence around the whole property would be acceptable. Wilmot said correct. Wenham asked if there was a rule to where the fence could go in relation to the creek? Wilmot mentioned that we do not have clarity on that. Strobel while looking at the survey with the red line as lot lines it is 15 -20 feet from creek. Wilmot said that there would be an accurate survey in with the permit packet with correct survey lines. Drays said that the overhead is an accurate survey. Member Strobel said that you could not put a fence along the creek because she does not own the property. Drays said no that it would cut through the middle of the backyard. Strobel asked if there was a barrier that is not on the Drays property back by the creek would that count? Because the edge of the creek is not on the property. Wilmot said that was correct. We (the City) look at it as the property owner's responsibility to apply fencing on her own property and since the creek is not her property she cannot use that. Strobel asks if there is any difference of concern between the feeder creek and the access points along that of the Minnehaha Creek? Wilmot said that any access point at any location of level to get into the backyard to have access to the swimming pool. Strobel said that it looks like it is easier to walk over the feeder creek then Minnehaha Creek, so if you put a fence across from the Freemans green fence straight across blocking the feeder through all the brush would it satisfy the requirements? Wilmot said that it does cover the rear yard of the property. Kirchman said he believes it may be adequate. You are here today to consider an alternate. Her alternate is the creek and whatever else is there. If that is adequate for you fine, if you think you want to add something to that, additional plants then that I believe that is OK. Kirchman pointed out different areas of where her fence could go. As long as someone can't get to the pool without crossing a 4' fence or its equivalent. Strobel said that we can't relieve the homeowner of the requirements of the ordinance is but what we can do is approve other materials in lieu of a fence. And so the ordinance specfically allows other materials approved by the Building Official and we can advise the Building Official to approve different materials. So if we think grass is equivalent to a non - climbable fence, we could approve this. Member Busyn asked if we have ever granted someone else in this situation for not having a fence. Wilmot said no. Busyn noted that the neighbor has a fence, so we've never had an alternative fence approved? Wilmot said that as you have Page 2 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 indicated the neighbors do have a fence which is on an elevated property and they have a wall and it is considered a non - climbable, 4' high fence. Member Simpson questioned that if there.were another set of rocks that surrounded the pool and came to 4' would that be acceptable? Wilmot said that the boulders she felt�would not be acceptable as they were climbable. Simpson noted that in the report the City first approved it and then did not approve why was that? Wilmot said it was first an inquiry without a permit submittal and was discussed with Kirchman to have an alternative fencing. It was not approved at that time for we did not have a permit application with plans and survey. Busyn noted that there was a letter forwarded to her. Wilmot said that after the permit and plans were received was when we did not approve the use of the creek. Strobel asked that when we say non - climbable, non - climbable by who? He went on to read the ordinance in saying it's an 11 gauge woven wire mesh material that's what the definition of non - climbable is. Members moved to the aerial photo. Member Simpson pointed out he couldn't get across the creek at his height. Came by side area and would rather go crossover the creek area. It's a fairly good size moat in the back. Also on the aerial it was pointed out where the side area (feeder) was from the Minnehaha Creek, area. Simpson noticed that the side creek is over grown in the winter time that might not be as bad and not quite a threat at that time and hopefully there would be a cover on the pool. Chair Wenham said that he thought a young child would not wander across the creek but could wander through the feeder creek area. He walked through there and it was not a pleasant experience. He saw three barriers in question, the creek on one side, the feeder which is very, very dry and the access. through the brush behind the neighbor's fence. And do all provide sufficient barriers to children wandering through? In his opinion, yes. Does it satisfy the requirements of the code, no. But that is why we are here is to decide. Are the 3 areas acceptable? Member Strobel wanted to know if we were aware of anytime previously where the City has denied a similar application where a property owner wanted to use the creek as a barrier. Wilmot said there were no other requests but would like to take a moment to point out that we look at the property owner as the responsible party and for you to consider park land as an acceptable alternative does not relive the property owner of their responsibility. Member Strobel asked if we instructed the homeowner to maintain a vegetation fence along the creek and then the city or whoever owned the property came along to cut it down the homeowner would not be able to stop it. Wilmot said that is correct. They can only manage what is on their property. Member Busyn noticed a rain garden. Drays said that was a requirement for the pool. Busyn wanted to know if they'also asked for a wetland; buffer? Kirchman said no, the rain garden area itwas simply to replace the fill that she put in the area regulated by the MCWD. Simpson asked if there was a letter from the Watershed District allowing a berm near the creek would that satisfy the requirements. Busyn said that they would make you dig another hole for flood issues. Drays mentioned that the Watershed District has asked her to be part of the creek preservation program which is meeting on Friday. They are designing what they want to do in the tall grass and what they want to do is to build it up and plant native grasses because there is erosion that is happening along the creek and the native grasses /plants and rocks that they put up there root better and help prevent erosion from going into the creek so I have to sign an affidavit that says I will maintain it and continue to keep it that way because it is provided fr the property owners at no expense. And they do have to get my permission, they can't do it without my permission even though some people in here say Page 3 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 it is creek property they consider it my property. And if I am in the program I have to maintain it for as long as I am in that home. She went on to mention that she did measure the depth of the creek from the bottom of the creek to the top of the grass not just the water line but there is a steep bank you have to climb up and at the low point it was 4'8" so it is higher than 4' because people cannot walk on water so it does meet the 4' requirement as an alternative. Strobel asked what she meant when she said top of grass? Drays explained that the creek water in Oct 2011 was at an all -time low it was between 18 -20" at its lowest point and with weeds that a small child would not be able to navigate through but from the low water level you still have several feet of the creek bank to get into my yard which is over 4'. This is a point that should not be overlooked. Member Simpson asked what the insurance company says? Drays said that they are fine with side yard fences. They consider the creek and, feeder creek to be barriers. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District said it has always been considered a barrier for purposes of fence requirements. They do not want to see fence along the creek. To me the process has been really frustrating when I hear at the beginning of the meeting that alternatives could have been purposed along the way. Property laws are entirely different from where I moved from. Did not realize all the "red tape" needed to build the pool and also home. The process of building the pool was a lot of interaction between myself, a surveyor, who I paid thousands of dollars, the Watershed District and the City. It was quite a process. I don't know at some point who had authority over what because everybody needed to work together. But at all times the Watershed was clear that the creek was a barrier and it wasn't until the bitter end of this planning that on August 28 from Solvei I was told the creek is not an acceptable barrier and then met with Kirchman on September 23 in his office. In order to get my permit Solvei came to the site and changed her mind that now I have to fence something that I never planned to fence during this entire design process and being told the creek is a natural barrier. So really frustrating that if I was told to put boulders 1 foot higher than the boulders you selected you would be fine. Do this or do that it would have been really good to know. Member Strobel asked when was the pool put in? Drays said that the pool was started last fall and wasn't finished until end May beginning of June of this year. Nothing was started until final approval plan of the pool. But the plan there had been months and months of planning of the design, location the shape of the pool, had she known that the creek was not a natural barrier I would of loved to of had open dialog, where someone would of said to me, we are not going to take that position anymore and it is not going to be a natural barrier. But the City. and Watershed very much work together on this process and all along the creek tells me no you are not allowed to put a fence up along the creek, we don't want a fence on the creek the creek is a natural barrier and so now I have 2 %: to 3 foot high boulders. Had I known that I would of selected 4 foot tall. Strobel asked when was the pool permit approved? Drays said it was September 23, after I had to changed things from Solvei's letter. Simpson asked if there were City inspectors on the property before September. Drays said that Solvei came in September. Simpson asked when did you file for the permit? Drays thought it was in June. Simpson then said the permit was put in on June and no one from the City appeared on the property until September? Drays said that was correct, which is frustrating because a lot of planning goes into it, from looking at the site, there is no requirement to fence in my entire yard there is a requirement to just fence in my pool. This pool based on so many different variations, such as setbacks, you're going to dig a hole and hit a spring from the creek and it is going to lift the pool out of the water. The nonsense that was encountered, I could keep you here for a long time. So I shrink down the pool to half the size of the pool that I originally had hoped for. It doesn't connect to two points of the house. One side of the pool (overhead) connects to the house where the other side where a fence would have to enclose it would attach to an open air patio. I would of liked to of had pool the length of the house, put a fence around it but that is not an option. Page 4 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 Drays went on showwhere she thought the fence would have to go. It's really frustrating hearing alternatives. Someone from the City could have been to my.house, many,, manymonths. This process went back and forth. Steve could probably show you how thick the file is and how many surveys I had. All this happened before the pool permit was issued. Then to find out`September 23, "oh guess what, we never mentioned this before, and now we are changing what we told you.in August and now what the creek has told you all along you can't rely on. Member Strobel questioned if the letter you received September 23 from Wilmot was received after your pool design was already finalized based on side yard fencing and was about to submit it for issuance of my pool permit. Drays explained that she was trying to get her: pool permit issued, she had applied many, many months before, permit couldn't be issued,, Kirchman said l should apply for the permit showing a fence and appeals later. Strobel wanted to know, if as of September 24, was there a hole in the ground? Drays: No ` Strobel: So, by the time you found out that the City was not going to allow you to proceed you had not done any construction. Drays: No construction. Strobel: So you proceeded with construction of the pool and the design that you chose knowing that it wasn't going to be approved Drays: Knowing that I had a really great chance at winning this. Strobel: You knew it had not been approved Drays: Correct.So the side yard setback, I have 2 young children and went to great expense, and my pool company will tell you how complicated it was to do a pool cover with the corners. The pool cover can withstand adults walking on top of it and when I am not at home that pool cover is on all the time. The side yard fences, the Freemans are here (5537 Woodcrest) who have lived much longer that me (18 years), I have never had a child enter my property from the creek,never even seen one —you would have to give your child a machete for them to go through .this. . Wenham: Let's have the'.Freemans talk, and4et's keep mind that young children would move into the neighborhood as well. We have to cover our bases. Mr. Freeman: I spend a huge amount of time in the back yard and sometimes get.across the feeder creek it is a chore. I do wild life photography and in the 18 years I've lived there I have not seen kids or anyone wander in off the creek you really have to work at it. Mrs. Freeman : It might be worth mentioning that on the other side of the feeder creek is Pamela Park, and is a wilderness and from there to 58`h St is brush, weeds, cattails, pond. The pond that is open to the street. Mr. Freeman: Actually you go across the feeder pond and there is fairly large pond with a muddy bottom and if you are concerned with drowning risks someone wandering into something Pamela park is full of Page 5 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 those things and that is what we are next to. It just seems to me that just getting across the creek or feeder creek and navigating around the swampy pond can go from anything from muddy residue to over flowing in a rainy time. Can vary a lot and quickly. There are so many natural hazards around there. My perception is the side yard fence that the real risk is people coming off of the street and right now there is no barrier to that. The side yard fence would accomplish that. If you go there and look, which I know a few of you have, and you look at the big picture that the hazards are really everywhere and apparent to the topography of the park and creek which is why we moved there. It is not easy to get through. Drays: There are no requirement to fence the whole yard that's clear. What is the alternative fencing around the pool? Side yard fencing would prevent children from drowning in the pool as well as the creek. Putting a side yard fence in would. prevent children from coming in, I don't understand why that wouldn't be a solution where now you have a home that protects children from drowning in the pool and drowning in the creek. Wenham: It's not your intentions are really in question here right? Drays: But there are no requirements that I do a whole yard, either we fence the pool or do side yard fences. I understand this and if this is really the issue, I would be happy to do put fencing to close this off. Strobel: You can't Wilmot: The City of Edina owns right there. Wenham: While I was there, there was the old concrete bases from other fence posts from a long time ago it was part of a chain link fence it had been grown through and married to the buckthorn that had grown into it but it was not connected all the way up (pointed to the bottom corner or property picture.) Drays: This is supposed to be the City of Edina's easement, this meets 4' alternate, you go from the bottom of the creek to where my yard starts you have 4' and higher, and this is actually pretty deep also The water is not deep the ditch this is very dry and often doesn't have flowing waters. Busyn: Why don't you want to put a fence around the pool? Drays: Because working with the watershed it kept shrinking smaller, smaller in size where originally before I knew setbacks, springs popping up it was going to be much larger it would be more connected to the house. Busyn : You didn't want to just put a fence around the perimeter of the pool? Drays: No there is no logical point for it to connect to the house. It's open. She showed on the survey pictures why it would not work. If I had known I would of picked 4' boulders but you still need some type of access point down I still feel that the side yard fences are such a simple dual protection, protecting children from pool and creek. Minnehaha Creek has always been considered an acceptable barrier for fence purposes. Wenham: A asked for any more community comments. Page 6 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 Ann Marie Rogers: who lives at 5641 Woodcrest Dr is here to support Drays and thinks the side yard fence would be adequate. Wenham: Asks Drays if she is done and any questions for her, 'Any thoughts on solutions? Simpson: I have read the code and one of the things that bothers me about black and white codes and black and white interpretation is the City of the Edina. It is very, very important that we protect the people but I also now we have to be realistic about it. When I walked the property I didn't realize how deep the creek was. It's very difficult to get across and to me it is a very formidable barrier. Second thing is the side creek there is a swamp on the other side and if the City might grant.permission to.pot the fence back up. I saw those rocks and it is an effort to get up them. I think we have a barrier on the creek, and barrier if a fence put back up. I think we really protect the intent of the law and maybe not the letter of the law. Wenham: So you would be comfortable the way it is? Simpson: Yes, with the side fencing and the City of Edina letting her add to that fence and the side creek. Adding some fencing down to the feeder creek. Walking around the pond in Pamela Park is a swamp. Strobel: There is a trail around Pamela Park over by the feeder. You can cross the creek with easy access. It is not a steep bank it is a gradual sloop. It would be easy for a 6 year old to crossover. Members examined overhead pictures showing where the trail was and the easy access to Drays property for a child. Concerned about people accessing an attractive nuisance. You can't pick a better spot than Pamela Park for a little child to come in and screw around. It's easy to get into the Drays yard. Drays:I know where you are talking about and those branches are about 25' from where the actual land ends. The:overhanging branches were in the way for kayaks. Strobel: These are not overhanging branches, these are branches lying in the creek bed. Drays: Went to overhead and went to show where the branches were in relation to her property, the property. Strobel: At the overhead he showed the area he was referring to and pointed out that they were 2 feet from property line. So it is not 60' from property,. and it is less than 10' from the trail. Ann Marie: Mentioning that is very hard to navigate through all the brush. We don't see kids back there. Strobel: You can see the trail head from Drays property. I don't think you can see it from your property(Rogers). In fairness across the creek from your property it is very much more dense then the Drays property. Wenham: What is your suggestion? Page 7 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 Strobel: Minnehaha Creek is a barrier, but the feeder creek is not. It is an attractive nuisance that draws kids, not keeps them away. If you can put a fence across to block from the feeder creek to the edge of Minnehaha Creek behind the tree that is on the corner of your property and do side yards I would be far less concerned about kids accessing the pool. Solvei: what I am hearing is that you are putting responsibility to the City of Edina to provide fencing for her pool on what is City land. Drays: I could put it in at my expense Strobel: Went on showing where he thought the fencing should go Drays: Showed where her trampoline was which is City property, doesn't know at what point the City easement is pertaining to creek. Would need City permission to put up a fence in feeder area. Strobel: So the side fence is good and even a 4' wall on the creek side doesn't provide an entire barrier around the pool. The reality is you just have to walk up to the deck to get into the pool you need some barrier. Busyn: I empathize with the applicant. It would of been great to come up with a solution for the wall. I don't think It is the City's responsibility to do design, it is up to your contractor. I walked the property and it's was pretty manicured with low vegetation 6" tall. At the house is there was an open spot. I don't think you should rely on the grasses as a barrier. I'ts not permanent, it dies in off in fall, new homeowners mow down to the creeks edge, I've build new homes on the creek and have seen people mow right down to the water's edge. I'm concerned about the grasses being considered a fence and the fact the 4' barrier being the creek bed is also variable over time. When creek goes up boaters would have access to property. The Creek could dry up and provide access that way. These are over the course of time that is why the codes are written, to prevent the maybe unlikely scenario. I'm concerned about the creek being the barrier, I do think there is a way to put a fence that is attractive to you. There was discussion between Busyn and Drays on ways to fence off her property. Busyn: I would like to see fence around the pool Wenham: I did not go across Pamela Park and see the vulnerable area along the feeder creek. If a child is going to wander and have a drowning accident it is going to be in the creek not the pool. I believe that the creek provides a barrier, the feeder creek is the only vulnerability that I see and whether it's a fence or some other format it needs to be taken in consideration. The City is not required to fence all the ponds here as well to prevent a child from wandering. My solution is to have more discussion on what we do around feeder creek. I would accept Minnehaha Creek as a barrier knowing that there are sideyard fences on both sides. Something in that bottom section needs to be done. I think it is in our interest to make recommendations for how to do that. We are also a city of residents who are taxpayers, and we have to make sure those are the true customers of the city and protect the children. Wilmot: I still have concerns. It was brought to our attention that where the property line is and we are relieving the property owner of the fencing requirements because we are having the park land act as part of her fencing. I am concerned about the property line with the code. Page 8 of 10 Construction, Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 Wenham: We are not making a judgment right now. We are making a recommendation and discussion and we will have to put together our complete `recommendation. Will we do that today Steve? Kirchman: We are at the point now where a motion can be.made and hopefully seconded and then there will probably be more a little more discussion to massage the motion, make changes to,:the . ,.motion to make sure everyone is OK with the motion and then you vote on it. If it passes fine if not make another motion.. Wenham: I will make two motions. First is to support the Minnehaha Creek as a barrier and the second is,how to deal with the bottom piece the feeder. I would like to make a motion to accept Minnehaha 'Creek as an appropriate-boundary along that line of the property with the consideration of the side yard fences are installed. Second: Simpson, Aye: Strobel, Nay: Scott Wenha'm: My second motion would be that we defer for the moment the recommendation on that , bottom piece until we all have had a chance to go out and visit Pamela Park and see it again from a pretty important perspective that Member Strobel saw and be able to come back and make a judgment that we think a fence should be installed or not and how that fence would work since it is City property not Drays property. Strobel: So I think the appropriate motion is to table consideration of the solution to the SE quradrant of the property for further discussion at another meeting pending two points. One, we need clarity of the property line and the City of Edina:interest as opposed to the Watershed's interest in that piece property and then pending adequate survey by the members I would move to table that consideration until a future meeting. There was discussion on getting an accurate survey. r Strobel: Wants to know who controls that ou lot. Kirchman: Went to overhead to clarify what was accepted and what needed at the future meeting. Wenham' Asked if;,Kirchman could find out who owns that piece of property by.the.feeder creek. Strobel: Tabled the motion until our -next meeting. There was discussion about the orange fencing that is up right now and where,Drays can place it. Question was &we would accept a construction fence by the feeder creek until that question is resolved. Wenham: Once the side fences are in can the orange fencing go up along the creek, but not before. Strobel: If the City or Watershed says no you cannot fence on the SE border where does that put us? Kirchman: You have accepted the creek as the barrier. If Drays can't provide a barrier around the pool because the City or MCWD won't let her put.a fence up at SE corner she is really back at square one as to complete the rest'of the barrier. Your motion is to accept the creek as a barrier really gets her only Page 9 of 10 Construction Board of Appeals - Meeting Minutes, 7/23/2012 part way there, but she should realize that it doesn't get her all the way there. The feeder creek section of the barrier still has to be resolved. If it can't be resolved by some type of fence she will have to put a fence somewhere else. Strobel: For clarity you should have an amendment to the motion clarifying that the feeder creek is not an acceptable barrier. Minnehaha Creek is an acceptable barrier but feeder creek is not. There was more discussion on where the temporary orange fence can go. Kirchman went up to the overhead to point out where acceptable areas for the temporary orange fence. Wenham: All in favor to the amendment to the motion Ayes: Strobel, Simpson, Busyn Strobel: The amendment is the Minnehaha Creek will be accepted as an alternative under section 450.25 for the fencing requirements. The feeder creek would not satisfy the requirements under 450.25. Second: Simpson, Ayes: Wenham, Nay: Busyn VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None was received VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Simpson would like to see senior management review through•this entire process from a to z It concerns me as a resident of Edina that we are in a reactive mode with the city staff. We pay top dollar for the expertise of City staff and they see a hundred lots a year with this kind of stuff. I would like to have staff go through and to give options. Chair Wenham said that have opportunities to do that now that we have an annual meeting scheduled. Member Simpson would like to see why it took June to September to get the Drays plans accepted. IX. STAFF COMMENTS No Comments X. ADJOURNMENT Chair Strobel motioned to adjourn, Member Busyn 2nd. All voted aye Motion passed. Adjournment at 9:00 am Page 10 of 10 Edina Art Center Board Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Art Center Studio 14 June 28, 2012 4:30 P.M. I. Call.to Order Mr. McCabe called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. II. Roll Call Members Present: Bill McCabe, Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Hafed Bouassida, Kitty O'Dea, Ray Meifert and Colin Nelson Members Absent: Justin Moran, Tara Mohtadi, John Swon and Thomas Raeuchle Interim Director. Frey noted that Marsha Buchok has resigned: Staff Present: Michael Frey, Interim Director; Phil Johnson, Peggy Kelly Media Studios Manager; Claire Lukens, Arts & Culture Intern; Ari Klugman, Intern to City Manager Scott Neal. Community Members Present: Katherine Bergstrom, Sutton & Associates. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Mr. McCabe noted the. meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. No additions to the agenda voiced. The agenda as stated is approved and will be followed. IV. 'Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes Chair McCabe asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 24, 2012. Member La Valleur requested on page 4, paragraph 4, change Edina "Watch Log" to Edina "Patch Blog Motion by Member Bouassida and seconded by Member O'Dea to approve the May 24, 2012 Minutes as presented with the change noted. Ayes: Bill McCabe, Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Hafed Bouassida, Kitty O'Dea, Ray Meifert and Colin Nelson. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Introductions Chair McCabe introduced Ms. Claire Lukens, intern for the Arts & Culture Working Group; Ms. Ari Klugman, intern to City Manager Scott Neal; and Ms. Katherine Bergstrom, Sutton & Associates. Each introduced themselves and provided education and background. The Board welcomed the interns and the Sutton consultant. B. Elections — Edina Art Center Board Chair & Vice - Chair — Action Chair McCabe provided a brief explanation of election rules then opened the floor for nominations Member Lappin nominated Member Bouassida for Chair to which he accepted the nomination. V Member Nelson nominated Chair McCabe for Vice - Chair. Chair McCabe replied nominations need to be done one position at a time. Member La Valleur questioned limitations. Chair McCabe requested the Board vote on the nomination of Bouassida for Chair. Voting was unanimous and the Board congratulated him. Member Bouassida and Member Nelson nominated Chair McCabe for Vice - Chair. Member La Valleur nominated Member Meifert to which he accepted the nomination. Member La Valleur expressed concern that while she valued Chair McCabe the outgoing Chair position should be to groom the incoming Chair and didn't need to be Vice -Chair to provide this knowledge. Chair McCabe questioned withdrawing. He noted he has to leave the Board entirely in January so could only be Vice - Chair until then. Member O'Dea questioned having two Vice - Chairs. Member Nelson questioned if it would make a difference if Chair McCabe had a title for a reason to be involved. Chair McCabe noted his involvement in several groups, plus consulting, and stated he didn't feel the need for official titles to participate. Member Bouassida stated he would like to see current issues continued for the next six months and by the time Chair McCabe is at term limitations, they will have been implemented. Interim Director Frey commented Chair McCabe can continue to serve on the Public Arts Committee since he is a resident. He added City code would need to be checked regarding having two Vice - Chairs. Member Bouassida proposed Chair McCabe be Vice -Chair through term limitations in January then Member Meifert would take over as Vice - Chair. Chair McCabe requested the Board vote by secret ballot on the two nominations for Vice - Chair. Director Frey collected and counted the votes noting the results were 4 to 2 with Chair McCabe abstaining. Chair McCabe will be Vice -Chair until his term limitation and then Member Meifert will become Vice - Chair. Chair McCabe thanked everyone for their support and the Board thanked Chair McCabe for his leadership. C. EPAC — Action Member La Valleur reviewed the EPAC file and commented on a received donation of $500 from Jim & Linda Masica. She noted discussion regarding possibly increasing the stipend for sculpture artists, from $500 to $1,000, due to time spent to make and that their work remains for a year. She stated the June meeting involved discussion regarding the reception and thanked those Board members who attended. Possibly lighting for some sculptures and the cost were also discussed. Member La Valleur stated Lois Ring announced at the reception they would be holding small tours of the sculptures, starting in July, and Board approval is needed. Motion by Member La Valleur and seconded by Chair McCabe to approve having small tours done by volunteers pre- selected by Ms. Ring. Member Bouassida asked the qualifications of those making the tours. Member La Valleur replied an interested group will gather on The Promenade and go themselves. Member O'Dea suggested publishing the tours and possibly coordinating with the garden tour. Member Bouassida questioned busing those on a tour. Member Nelson questioned the liability issue. Chair McCabe replied it is the same as anyone walking in the park. Ayes: Bill McCabe, Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Hafed Bouassida, Kitty O'Dea, Ray Meifert and Colin Nelson. Motion carried. The Board commended Member La Valleur on the reception. <� Director Frey stated the new City of.Edina website'is now up and running and has beautiful photos thanks to Member La Valleur. D. Edina Art Center Consultant Interim Director Frey stated the working group has had several meetings with Sutton & Associates to strategize how to approach the process. He requested input from the Board regarding the.mission statement and asked to send any information to Ms. Lukens and himself. Interim Director Frey stated.-the mission .-statement discussion meeting has been moved and the organizational structure 501(c) (3) discussion is moved to July 12th due to pending discussion regarding Southdale Shopping Mall. Interim Director Frey stated Simon Property Group, Inc. is asking for an artistic presence at Southdale Mall and the architect for Simon will attend the meeting.. He clarified the Art Center would not be moving to Southdale but they would have a presence there. He added'Simon is offering two years rent free and a longer contract would be negotiated moving forward. He noted it is'premature to do anything now. Interim;Director.Frey noted Minnetonka Art Center's presence of three years at Ridgedale and the challenges they face, which resulted in having had to change their strategy frequently. Member O'Dea questioned who is involved -inthe mission`statement process to whicli Interim Director Frey named the groups involved. . Member O'Dea questioned what information is being_used to evaluate whether the current mission statement is appropriate and noted it should be broader. Ms. Bergstrom replied the mission statement currently focuses on the facility itself instead of any impact. Member,O'Dea suggested input from current users to understand further, what the role is in the community. Interim Director Frey replied he will relay to George Sutton. Ms. Lukens added she will be working on the resident's aspect and noted she could add a question to the survey. Interim Director Frey read,the current mission statement noting it is fairly limited. The Board "agreed it is time for a change. E. Arts & Culture Working Group Chair McCabe stated they had a meeting earlier this,month with a.small group in attendance and people are still grasping what it is all about. He added public members are having a hard time separating ACWG from ACB. Ms. Lukens stated she has been looking at.various art centers and provided a list of several centers across the country with the same or similar population as Edina that had great mission statements for the Board to review. She asked for input and provided her contact. information. She added a list will be compiled to present at the next meeting. Ms. Lukens noted they are looking "at Edina's Art Center presence in the community. -She noted they will be working on a survey and sending online to Edina Art Center members as well as others and will be posted on the website. Member- B'ouassida.commented on the backtracking in meetings, as some have not previously attended. He noted they are planning on meeting every two weeks now instead of once a month. Proposed ideas from these meetings will be entered into a database and by October or November, they will come up with a final presentation to City Council. Member La Valleur mentioned that the Edina Patch Blog posted last week talked about the working group and helps get the word out. She asked for comments about business and art supporting each other in Edina for the.blog. F. Film Festival This item was not discussed. G. Members' Juried Show — 281h Annual Chair McCabe stated they met this week and are soliciting individuals and businesses for donations. He noted they selected the jurors. Interim Director Frey noted the jurors. Chair McCabe stated shortly they will solicit work from artists. Interim Director Frey stated the number of printed JS programs is limited but they would like to include more of an advertising presence, perhaps sell ads in the program. H. Membership Member Lappin reported on current memberships and stated the report now includes the number of members who have renewed in previous months, which is 'a constant flow. She noted those who have expired and those who have renewed. Member Lappin stated regarding the Speaking Tour she, wiII sit down with Mr. Johnson and come up with a schedule; possibly beginning again in the fall. Member Bouassida commented on membership growth. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair McCabe asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Member Comments Member O'Dea stated a student Alex Fisher from Edina Art School made a documentary about bullying and there are open shows at the Edina Theater, to check the blog. IX. Staff Comments A. Interim Director Report Interim Director Frey stated they have started summer camps with most (68 %) of them being clay camps and have strong registration for kid's camps. He added adult classes are not doing as well; almost half (44%) were canceled in June. Interim Director Frey reviewed membership and gift shop numbers. Member O'Dea asked if the mix for June classes was similar to last year. Interim Director Frey replied they added a number of new classes for spring and summer and some for fall but they are similar to last year. He noted beading is incredibly big with kids. Interim Director Frey noted the opening for The Ming Chiao Chapter Brush Painting Exhibit is tonight, upstairs. X. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 5:41 p.m. it �I {�! Edina Art Center Board Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Art Center Studio 14 July 26„2012 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Vice - Chair McCabe called the meeting to order at 4:33 p.m. II. Roll Call Members Present: Bill McCabe, Hafed Bouassida, Barbara LaValleur, Ray Meifert; Colin Nelson, Kitty O'Dea, Thomas Raeuchle, and John Swon. Members Absent: Dana Lappin, Tara Mohtadi, and Justin Moran. Staff Present: Michael Frey, Interim Director; Phil Johnson, Peggy Kelly Media Studios Manager; Claire Lukens, Arts & Culture Intern; Ann Kattreh, Assistant Director, Parks & Recreation; Sandra Shaughnessy, Pottery Studios Manager and Anne Spooner, Program & Gallery Coordinator, Monica Sullivan, Front Desk Staff. Community Members Present: George Sutton, Sutton & Associates; Katherine Bergstom, Assistant to George Sutton; Jim . Van Valkenburg, and Lois Ring. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair McCabe noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. He suggested the agenda be modified to consider items VI.D., VI.E., and VI.F. before items VI.A., VI.B., and VI.C. to allow the Board to devote more time to the first three topics. No objections were voiced. The agenda was approved as amended. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of June 28, 2012 Chair McCabe asked if there were`changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 28, 2012. No changes voiced. The minutes were approved as circulated. V. Community Comment I. None VI. Reports /Recommendations D. Film Festival - See Attachment A Member Swon provided an update on the Film Festival and advised that the date has been changed to October 25 -27, 2012, in order to avoid competing with the Twin Cities Film Festival.. He thanked Member Meifert for the contribution from 3M and stated they are on track to hit their budget numbers. He stated they have -a great selection of films for this year and expressed thanks to Mickie Turk and the rest of the committee for all of their help. Member Bouassida stated he was pleased that the date for the Film Festival was changed. He requested a meeting with Dick Crockett and Member Swon to discuss ways for Dick Crockett to participate in the Film Festival. E. Members' Juried Show - See Attachment B 16 Chair McCabe advised that a report was provided to the Board by email yesterday. He stated that current donations have reached $875. E. Membership Mr. Frey stated the 2012 membership goal is 1,000 members and there are currently 1,014 members. He thanked Member Lappin for all of her work and stated it has made a significant difference in the Art Center's membership. Barbara La Valleur stated they had their first tour today of the sculptures and they hope to promote this on Facebook and by other means. She requested that everyone take time to vote before the next meeting. Mr. Frey distributed ballots to the Board. A. Introduction —George Sutton, Sutton & Associates Chair McCabe introduced George Sutton, Sutton & Associates. B. Edina Art Center Consultant— Update & Mission Statement Mr. Sutton stated the Scope of Work authorized by the City Council includes a review of the current programs and services, review of the mission statement, review of the current structure to provide a recommendation regarding whether the Art Center should be a 501(c)(3) organization or a hybrid of a public /private partnership or owned by the City, and a review of current operations to determine if there are efficiencies that can be created within the organization. He indicated the Advisory Board will be conducting a tour of three regional art centers on August 6. He added that the Arts & Culture Working Group has been asked to join the Board to obtain broader input regarding the mission statement. Mr. Frey noted the Arts & Culture Working Group will join the Board at 6:00 p.m. tonight. Member Bouassida asked Mr. Sutton if he felt the current mission statement was inadequate. Mr. Sutton replied the mission statement was included in the Scope of Work in the RFP and added he felt the mission statement merits further discussion. Chair McCabe recited the current mission statement and stated the mission statement might not accurately represent what the Art Center does. Member La Valleur stated the mission statement should be updated and be a short, impactful mission statement. Chair McCabe stated a 501(c)(3) organization allows tax exempt donations and serves as an incentive for people to donate money, e.g., hospitals and churches. He stated the Art Center is currently set up as a unit of city government and has a relationship with the Edina Community Foundation that is a 501(c)(3); in addition, the Art Center board serves as an advisory board appointed by and advising the City Council. He indicated a 501(c)(3) organization would be separate from the City and the Minnetonka Center for the Arts is an example of a 501(c)(3) organization and they own their own building and raise their own funds. He stated another option for the Art Center would be a government or city -owned facility with a separate 501(c)(3) organization to raise funds and support the operations of the facility. Member Raeuchle suggested stepping back one step to understand why the consultant is looking at the Art Center's organizational structure and stated the question was brought up by the City Council as to whether there is another organizational form that would make it easier to raise funds that would come either in addition to or as a replacement of the city funds. He stated each of the options has its advantages and disadvantages and the consultant and Board were asked by the city to see if there is a form that would lend itself better to the continued operation of the Art Center. Mr. Sutton stated his observation was that the Art Center currently has one of the best systems because it is a public sector entity with a reliable funding source that is responsible for maintaining the facility and providing operating support. He stated the Art Center has not historically had fundraising staff and the city is interested in seeing what other funding sources could be accessed to support the mission of the Art Center. Member Bouassida stated the role of the Board has not been clear whether it should raise money or conduct the business of the Art Center. Mr. Sutton indicated that fundraising has not previously been the role of this Board and the city is constantly looking for ways to leverage taxpayer resources from the broader taxpayer pool and there is currently II` no structure in place within the Art Center to do fundraising. He stated if the Art Center wants to have a dedicated person for fundraising, the organizational structure has to be reviewed and given the existing structure, the Art Center is limited in terms of the grant funds it receives. Member Bouassida stated the idea of creating a "Friends of model means that board members have to start that process and give money to participate. Member Raeuchle stated other institutions request giving targeted toward specific events and exhibits and the Art Center has never had a structure where it would request giving fora specific project, e.g., a new kiln, and added that requesting money to be used for operational expenses of the,Art Center would be a hard sell. Member.Meifert felt that the discussion regarding the Art Center's organizational structure was premature and felt the Board should first work on its mission statement. Mr. Sutton stated the organizational structure is within the Scope of Work that the City Council authorized and felt the opportunity exists now to seek incremental change, to safeguard the Art Center's position, and to leverage its position. Member Bouassida requested the Board take an informal vote on.the three options presented by Mr. Sutton for the structure of the Art Center. Member Raeuchle felt-the current Art Center structure was adequate and the city should continue to contribute funding for the Art Center in the same way it does for other recreational activities in the city. He questioned if there were other things the Board could do to increase awareness and outreach of the Art Center. Member.Bo,uassida.stated he would prefer the second model presented by Mr. Sutton and then down the road come up with 501(c)(3) organization to raise money. After a show of hands, the majority of Board Members were in favor of Option 1— No change to the organizational structure, with three Board Members in favor of Option 2 — a 'Friends Of' model, and no Board Members in favor of Option 3 — a separate 501(c)(3) organization. Mr. Johnson clarified that the Art Center staff does not currently fund raise. He stated the municipal liquor stores were established specifically to support city activities and' sports and recreation activities including the arts and that was the rationale for creating the municipal liquor stores. Member Swon stated he was in favor of Option 2 and felt it would behoove the Board to begin the process regardless of the organizational structure,and to begin formulating a fundraising committee. Member Bouassida stated tfie choice of organizational model has to be determined first then the rest of the things will come into play, i.e., the mission statement and operational structure. Mr. Sutton presented the current organizational chart noting the Art Center has a lot of part-time people, which puts a lot of administrative responsibility on the Director to manage all the staff and keep productivity high. He stated the current operational structure.is -not very efficient and questioned, whether it was possible to'fhave a smaller group of full - time employees 'who are qualified to serve „the mission of the Art Center in a more efficient way. He added there are currently 14 people serving.five to six full =time positions within the organization. Member LaValleur concurred with Mr. Sutton's conclusion. and felt it would be more efficient to have fewer part -time staff and use more full-time staff. Member Bouassida agreed and stated the current organizational structure takes a lot of effort to manage and schedule. He added he would like to see full =time people in charge of a particular aspect of the Art Center. Member Nelson noted there was an advantage to all the effort and energy that the current staff members bring but acknowledged the difficulty in managing all these people; he felt if there was a core of three full -time people each handling a particular area, you could fit in all sorts of volunteers and'still keep the staff small. Member O'Dea felt the Art Center loses some opportunities because the current structure is so fragmented. Member Bouassida stated the current structure adds up to 5.29 FTE. Member Raeuchle stated the management effort to manage all these people can soak up more than one individual's time and added there is currently no label of marketing or outreach in the current structure. Chair McCabe stated the Art Center has a very dedicated staff and the Board is interested in looking for efficiencies within the organization. C. Arts & Cultural Working Group Mr. Frey advised the Arts & Cultural Working Group will join the Board at 6:00 p.m. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair McCabe asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Member Comments Member LaValleur stated she recently met Mr. Lund who told her he was interested in having public art incorporated in the design of the new Byerly's on France Avenue. She advised she met with their real estate manager last week to discuss public art and will follow -up with them. Lois Ring stated she felt the Board should expand its call for the juried art show. She asked that the Art Center consider hosting a reception after the Film Festival. Member Swon agreed with the idea of a reception following the Film Festival noting there is an issue with timing because the reception would have to be scheduled on a day the festival is not running because the festival runs until around 11:00 p.m. each night. IX. Staff Comments Mr. Frey thanked Anne, Phil, and Sandra for all of their work. He stated all of the Art Center staff view the work of the consultant as an opportunity and are pleased that the Art Center operations are being re- examined. Member Bouassida requested that the next Board agenda include a report and discussion regarding the Southdale proposition. Chair McCabe directed staff to place this on the agenda for next month. Mr. Frey advised that a letter will be distributed to the Board regarding this issue. Member O'Dea asked about the fall catalog. Mr. Frey reported that the 32 -page fall catalog went to print yesterday. He stated it was too late to change the dates for the film festival and apologized that the catalog will not contain the new dates. X. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 6:09 p.m. Edina Art Center Board Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Art Center Studio 14 August 23, 2012 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Chair Bouassida called the meeting to order at 4:31 p.m. II. Roll Call Members Present: Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Hafed Bouassida, Kitty O'Dea, Ray Meifert, John Swon,. Bill McCabe, Colin Nelson and Thomas Raeuchle Members Absent: Justin Moran and Tara Mohtadi Staff Present: Michael Frey, Interim Director; Phil Johnson, Media Manager; Claire Lukens, Intern. Community Members Present: George Sutton, Sutton & Associates; Katherine Bergstrom, Sutton & Associates. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair Bouassida noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. Chair Bouassida requested that the Edina Art Center Consultant — Update be discussed first under Reports/ Recommendations. The agenda as revised, with one change, is approved and will be followed. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes Chair Bouassida asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 26, 2012. Member La Valleur requested "Chair McCabe" be changed to "Vice Chair McCabe." Motion by Member Swon and seconded by Member Meifert to approve the July 26, 2012 Minutes as presented with the change noted. Ayes: Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Hafed Bouassida, Kitty O'Dea, Ray Meifert, John Swon, Bill McCabe, Colin Nelson and Thomas Raeuchle. V. Community Comment None VI. Reports /Recommendations . A. Arts & Culture Working Group This item was discussed after Edina Art Center Consultants — Update. Member Raeuchle noted during their meetings, thirteen topics were investigated while several other topics are yet to be discussed. He provided upcoming meetings whereby they will start drawing conclusions. There are people looking for space to perform their art and to exchange information but there is no space in Edina that is affordable and /or available. He provided an update of top topics, which will be presented to the city. He noted there are a lot of opportunities out there with little cost that will enhance the visibility of the Center. Chair Bouassida requested Ms: Lukens extend her internship. Director Frey replied there is a meeting next .week to discuss that issue. Motion by Member Raeuchle and seconded by Member Nelson to request City Council provide more support from the city. Mr. Sutton suggested before information is disseminated, the Board have clarity on where the gaps are. Member Meifert suggested they need to have a firm plan to organize the data. Member Raeuchle replied the working group will be analyzing the data. Vice Chair McCabe questioned the budget for extra support. Members Raeuchle and Nelson accepted a friendly amendment to add to the motion: "for three more months." Ayes: Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Hafed Bouassida, Kitty O'Dea, Ray Meifert, John Swon, Bill McCabe, Colin Nelson and Thomas Raeuchle. B. Edina Art Center Consultant — Update This item was considered before Arts & Culture Working Group. Mr. Sutton provided a brief overview of where they are in the process. He noted the program and services are remarkable and they produce a good amount of revenue even with the limitations. There is more opportunity to look at how to educate the community. He noted the Center's strengths and weaknesses and the marketing budget. Member Meifert asked if they would be recommending a budget. Mr. Sutton replied they will not, but will be providing examples. Member Meifert suggested they provide recommendations in terms of marketing. Mr. Sutton replied they will review and provide a percentage. Member Raeuchle noted it is imperative they keep appropriate statistics on class participation. Member O'Dea indicated they are leaving a lot of seats empty so there is current opportunity. Member Raeuchle suggested assistance with social media advertising. Mr. Sutton noted the mission statement was discussed at the last meeting and is not adequate. He asked the board for examples of what he could provide to City Council. He noted the report deadline is September 14. Member La Valleur replied they are not ready to provide something today, but will in the near future. Discussion ensued regarding the report deadline versus the next meeting date, as it needs to be voted on by the board. Member La Valleur read versions of the mission statement the working group has developed thus far. Mr. Sutton suggested the mission statement be one sentence. Chair Bouassida requested the working group continue developing the mission statement. Motion by Member Raeuchle and seconded by Member La Valleur to schedule a meeting in two weeks to approve the mission statement. Member Raeuchle cautioned the technicalities of scheduling and cancelling meetings. After further discussion, the board agreed to vote on the mission statement at the next regular meeting. Member Raeuchle withdrew the motion. Member O'Dea suggested the board review the mission statement ahead of time. Chair Bouassida asked the working group to provide a draft ahead of time so the board can respond. Member Raeuchle requested the group send out what they currently have for responses. The Board discussed staffing issues. Director Frey noted they will be meeting to discuss the 2013 work plan. C. Film Festival Mr. Johnson presented the staff report regarding the film festival, noting they put works together that were more inspirational. He presented a letter that will be sent to a list of organizations and provided an example of the brochure, updated from last year that will be sent with the letter. He also reviewed each day of the festival schedule, noting it will not be mailed. Member Meifert provided a brief overview of some films that will be played during the festival. Member La Valleur asked about times available. Mr. Johnson noted the schedule and indicated they will be doing follow up contacts once the mailings go out. Chair Bouassida noted cost is the big issue. D. Members' Juried Show Director Frey noted donations received stating .a letter and advertising specifications. were sent to businesses with little response. They are now working on artwork for the program. He indicated donations are down and suggested board members assist in making calls for donations. Instead of videotaping the opening reception, Mr. Johnson suggested videotaping when the judges review the works and indicate why they like the pieces. Board consensus was reached to video tape the judges. E. Membership Member Lappin reviewed the membership numbers noting September is a big month for renewals due to the Members' Juried Show. She added their goal was achieved last month and offered to send out the numbers. F. Public Art Committee Member La Valleur referenced the report sent out earlier. She noted the Healing Sculpture on the promenade has been vandalized three times so they are looking into surveillance. The artist would like to donate the sculpture to the city. She suggested the information be disseminated to the community and ask them to be more vigilant. Member La Valleur stated they are looking at expanding the area on the promenade and requested the Board ask the city to accept this donation. Vice Chair McCabe noted the EPAC Committee should make the recommendation to the Board. Member La Valleur reviewed the volunteer schedule for Fall into the Arts. G. Southdale Opportunity Chair Bouassida stated they have no additional news. Director Frey replied,they handed out the original proposal with a presentation from the architect. He provided a brief overview of the third floor of Southdale and that Edina has first right of refusal. He noted the complications of having the art center at that location. Member O'Dea asked about a limited presence. Member Raeuchle replied the space is not a desirable location for retail. Director Frey noted there would be a staffing issue. He added they talked with marketing at The Galleria to display artwork. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Bouassida asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Member Comments Chair Bouassida noted the City of Edina has a large amount of dollars allocated and the Art Center is not on the list. The board suggested they could buy a registration system with extra dollars. Member Raeuchle asked if they could bring that matter to the council. Director Frey noted the 2013 budget is closed but they can discuss it at future work sessions. He noted the new website has the capability to eliminate the current system and go to an automated system. Vice Chair McCabe suggested they discuss this matter at the joint council meeting in September. IX. Staff Comments A. Interim Director Report None X. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 6:18 p.m.