The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012-12-04 COUNCIL MEETING_ AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DECEMBER 4, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.). A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of November 20, 2012, Work Session Of November 20, 2012, Closed Meeting of November 20, 2012 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 11/22/2012, TOTAL $2,931,736.16 And Per Pre -List Dated 1/29/12. TOTAL $1,106,392.37 and Credit Card Transactions Dated ?? TOTAL: $ C. Request For Purchase For Soil Remediation At Braemar Public Works Area, Improvement No. A -243 D. Resolution No. 2012 -164 Approving Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base Conditional Use License Agreement E. Resolution No. 2012 -165 Approving Senior Citizen Special Assessment Deferrals F. .Selection.MMKR As City Auditor G. Cunningham Group Architecture, Inc., Architect Services Contract Agreement H. Request For Purchase — Asphalt Paver Replacement I. Request'For Purchase — Mobile Production System J. Ordinance No. 2012 -23 Providing Fee For Alternative Water Meter Reading Program K. Resolution No. 2012 -166 Setting Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees For 2013 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Agenda /Edina City Council December 4, 2012 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Review Of 2013 Operating Budget And 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Program — (Hold Hearing) B. PUBLIC HEARING — 2013 Liquor License Fees— (Hold Hearing) C. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat With Lot Width And Lot Area Variances. Jerrod Lindquist, 5945 Concord Avenue, Resolution No. 2012 -159 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) D. PUBLIC HEARING: Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, Front Yard Setback Variance, Parking Stall Variance and Subdivision, 10 Southdale Center For Stuart Development Company, Resolution Nos. 2012 -160, 2012 -161 and 2012 -162 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) E. PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning From PSR -4 To PUD and Amending Subsection 850 Establishing The PUD -2 Zoning District For 3420 Heritage Drive, Erik's Ranch, Ordinance No. 2012 -21 (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2012 -163 Accepting Various Donations Agenda/Edina City Council 1 December 4, 2012 t Page 3 B. Ordinance No. 2012 -20 Concerning Council Salaries (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. Ordinance No. 2012 -22 Amending Schedule 185A Setting Fees For 2013 (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Park Board, October 9, 2012 2. Human Rights & Relations Commission, October 23, 2012 3. Planning Commission, November 14, 2012 4. Edina Transportation Commission, October 25, 2012 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Dec 4 Work Session — Name Your Neighborhood 5:00 P.M. Tues Dec 4 Regular Meeting . 7:00 P.M. Tues Dec 11 Special Meeting — Public Improvement Hearings 6:00 P.M. Tues Dec 18 Work Session — Finalize 2013 Work Plans 5:30 P.M. Tues Dec 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY —City Hall Closed Tues Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 1 NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 8 Work Session - HRA Planning 5:30 P.M. Tues Jan 8 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jan 15 Work Session - Naming & Donation Policy Review 5:30 P.M. Ties Jan 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. n Jan 21 DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed ,aes Feb 5 Work Session - Legislative Update 5:30 P.M. Tues Feb 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Feb 18 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Feb19 Work Session —Jnt Meeting Art Center Board & Wk Groups 5:30 P.M. Tues Feb 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 20, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members _Bennett, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent and excused was Member Brindle III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.E., Encroachment Agreement, 4166 Monterey Avenue; IV.G., Request for Purchase, Countryside Park Playground; IV.K., Waiver of Building Permit Fees; and, IV.L., Revised RJM Construction Management Services Contract, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of November 5, 2012; Canvass meeting minutes of November 9, 2012; and, Town Hall meeting minutes of November 10, 2012 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 8, 2012, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $118,653.19; Working Capital Fund $101,181.53; Equipment Replacement Fund $14,510.42; Art Center Fund $4,773.77; Golf Dome Fund $10,974.20; Aquatic Center Fund $2,399.38; Golf Course Fund $6,383.25; Ice Arena Fund $24,753.31; Edinborough Park Fund $4,445.47; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,391.33; Liquor Fund $213,233.16; Utility Fund $111,285.31; Storm Sewer Fund $19,084.20; PSTF Agency Fund $24,949.61; Payroll Fund $3,348.54; TOTAL $661,366.67 and for approval of payment of claims dated November 15, 2012, and consisting of 23 pages; General Fund $95,734.59; Police Special Revenue $7,798.84; Working Capital Fund $21,878.60; Equipment Replacement Fund $7,182.43; Art Center Fund $1,723.18; Aquatic Center Fund $1,237.05; Golf Course Fund $18,758.44; Ice Arena Fund $1,265.17; Edinborough Park Fund $10,442.19; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,501.83; Liquor Fund $191,879.29; Utility Fund $369,156.95; Recycling Fund $34,192.80; PSTF Agency Fund $24,229.88; Centennial TIF District $4,927.54; TOTAL $791.908.78. IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -152 receiving feasibility studies for 2013 Neighborhood Street Improvements IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -154 authorizing Public Improvement and Special Assessment for 5504 Kellogg Avenue, 5517 Dever Drive, 5416 Kellogg Avenue, 5416 Oaklawn Avenue, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue, and 5409 Kellogg Avenue RA& rwwreaGhme nt Ae.re.e.ment 4166 MGnte.re y A.ee...,p IV.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -155 approving Lot Division, 7309 -7311 Glouchester Drive IV.H. Renew Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health entities in Minnesota Mutual Aid Agreement IV.I. Renew Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division IV.J. Review Public Health Emergency Preparedness Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20.2012 IV.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -157 setting December 18, 2012, hearing date for consideration of Vacation of Utility Easement, 6500 France Avenue and 4005 West 65th Street Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA I V. E. ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT, 4166 MONTEREY AVENUE —APPROVED Engineer Houle answered questions of the Council relating to the grade of the unimproved right -of -way on the subject site that would be lowered slightly. He noted the location of a retaining wall along the newly created driveway and indicated a swale would be created. Mr. Houle reviewed the location of trees that were removed and indicated that four new trees would be planted. The Council acknowledged there was a drainage issue in this area and it appreciated that a swale would be created to provide infiltration. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving Encroachment Agreement, 4166 Monterey Avenue. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.G. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE —COUNTRYSIDE PARK PLAYGROUND —APPROVED Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Kattreh indicated the citizen group process worked well and the same process would be used for the park shelter building. She displayed a picture of the primarily metal Countryside play structure and indicated it was selected for the amount of play value it provided. It was noted that the structure would be completely poured in place (rubber structure), including the area under the swings and moved to a more shady area. Ms. Kattreh indicated staff would pursue donation opportunities for the existing play structure. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving Request for Purchase, the Countryside Park Playground, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Minnesota Wisconsin Playground at $173,337.97. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.K. WAIVER OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES —APPROVED Manager Neal stated that he was requesting waiver of permit fees for the Golf Dome, and the roof replacement projects for the Grange Hall and the Cahill School. The Council discussed the past practice of waiving building permit fees, noting the City did not have a principal policy to address that issue. It was noted that if fees were paid for the two projects that were not separate city enterprises, i.e., the Grange Hall and Cahill School, the fees , it would come from the General Fund and then go back into the General Fund. Member Bennett added that because city enterprises have their own budgets, there would be a loss of transparency if building permit fees that would have been paid from enterprise funds were waived. Member Bennett concluded that she preferred that the waivers of building permit fees be considered separately for city enterprises and city facilities funded through the General Fund. le« of tFaAS aFe..G., if the building p M.it fees were waived Mr. Neal responded that if building permit fees for the Golf Dome were waived, the city could apply more of the insurance proceeds toward construction rather than administrative costs. Mr. Neal advised that the golf dome as it existed before it burned down would require a cash contribution unless the City, together with Travelers, were successful in pursuing the electrical contractor or equipment manufacturer for damages. At this point, the amount of contribution had not yet been determined but was expected to be Page 2 E Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 ^� �� ^� ^•^ *� °^ $100,000. In response to Member Sprague's question about energy efficient changes recommended by the Energy & Environment Commission, Mr. Neal replied they would add $70,000 to $90,000 to the cost of the project. !",r; NPA He indicated staff would conduct a cost analysis to determine how long it would take to recover the City's investment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to approve waiver of building permit fees for the Golf Dome, and the roof replacement projects for the Grange Hall and the Cahill School. Ayes: Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Abstain: Bennett Motion carried. IV. L. REVISED RJM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT —APPROVED Mr. Neal provided an update on the golf dome project, indicating staff was working through the cost to rebuild the dome using the same service levels and quality of play and with Travelers Insurance to determine how to best maximize the insurance coverage for improvements. He described the work and permitting process completed to date, anticipated construction schedule, and cost considerations that would be presented to the Council in the future. With regard to the Watershed permitting process, Attorney Knutson stated the conditions were imposed because a new building would be constructed. There was no distinction that it would be a replacement building since more than 50 cubic yards of dirt would be moved. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the revised RJM Construction Management Services Contract, in an AIA format, to provide construction management services for the Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Project. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. PROCLAMATION— PREVENTION WORKS CAMPAIGN Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring the weeks of November 18, 2012, through January 2, 2013, to be the Prevention Works! Campaign in the City of Edina. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the proclamation declaring Prevention Works! Campaign, November 18, 2012, through January 2, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Chemical Health Coordinator Iverson accepted the proclamation and thanked the City Council for its support. She described prevention measures and events planned during the Prevention Works! Campaign. She indicated the information provided was available on the website. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. SITE PLAN — STARBUCKS, 7510 FRANCE AVENUE —RESOLUTION NO. 2012-156 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented a map of the subject site and request of Bruce Carlson, on behalf of Centennial Lakes Plaza, for Site Plan review to build a 1,750 sq. ft. Starbucks Coffee Shop with a drive - through window on the west side and an outdoor seating area within the parking lot of Centennial Lakes Plaza at 7501 France Avenue. Mr. Teague reviewed the parking requirement and indicated the proposed plans meet all of the City's minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. The Planning Commission recommended approval on a 5 -2 vote conditioned on the City Engineer's recommendation that the required sidewalk improvements per the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvements (an 8 -foot wide sidewalk) be completed on the site within ten years of the Site Plan approval or when the France Avenue sidewalks on the adjacent properties to the north and south were installed, whichever comes first. The two dissenting Commissioners had concern with the stacking lane between the building and sidewalk. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 The Council considered whether to require a Proof of Stacking Agreement should the stacking lane for 13 cars be inadequate and result in traffic backing up onto the drive aisle. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council and indicated 840 parking spaces were proposed, after 61 spaces were removed and six or seven were constructed in front of the building. Tony Hepplemann, WSB & Associates, presented its analysis of the traffic study, impacts associated with the proposed Starbucks Coffee Shop, and finding that it would generate 78 trips during peak hours and 3�8 _148 trips during Saturday peak. This would result in a not noticeable three - second vehicle delay at any of the intersections. Levels of service (measure of delay) would be unchanged and remain at an acceptable level. Mr. Hepplemann indicated the queuing average was 11 vehicles with a maximum of just over 13. It was the professional opinion of WSB there would be no issues relative to the additional traffic this use would generate. Mr. Hepplemann indicated that special event situations causing additional need could be addressed by signage to not back out into the entry. Proponent Presentation Bruce Carlson, Project Director Mid - America Real Estate, described the new businesses at the Center, indicating its success, and presented the Starbucks Coffee Shop Site Plan. He explained the orientation of the building had been changed from being perpendicular to being parallel to the France Avenue corridor to better accommodate stacking. While it caused some view corridor issues, the tenants had agreed to move forward. Mr. Carlson displayed an aerial image of the Center and noted the area proposed for the Starbucks indicating little or no activity mid -day. He also displayed pictures of the area proposed for Starbucks during the morning, its peak time, indicating no vehicles or activity. Mr. Carlson stated they were excited about bringing the shopping center closer to France Avenue to encourage pedestrian and bicycle use instead of adding more parking spaces. He stated property management does not want stacking into the central entrance and that could be addressed with yellow stripes in the entrance as well as signage, if needed. The Council discussed the Site Plan and asked questions of the proponent. Mr. Carlson indicated the Center had a 10 -20% vacancy in the lower level. He explained Starbucks wanted a drive through at this location, which would relieve pressure on other Starbucks in Edina. With regard to parking in front of Old Navy, Mr. Carlson stated Old Navy had indicated it supported the Starbuck's application, thinking it would potentially increase traffic to Old Navy. Mr. Carlson stated the amount of shared parking left between Starbucks and Old Navy would not create concern in attracting future tenants. Mr. Carlson presented the Site Plan depicting the crosswalk and indicated it would include a State standard crosswalk sign. He felt vehicles could not gain too much speed between the pick -up window and crosswalk. The Geunri Member Bennett suggested a "belt and suspender" approach by adding a stop line. Mr. Carlson accepted that suggestion and indicated "STOP" would also be painted in the drive aisle. Kathy Alexander, Architectural Consortium, presented an elevation graphic depicting scale, noting Starbucks was only 1,700 sq. ft. with a 40 -foot wall length. She opined the proportion of this building and elevation on France Avenue created asymmetry and a handsome building. It was indicated the Planning Commission had not seen this particular graphic. Ms. Alexander noted the trash enclosure location next to the building to address functionality with a large landscaped buffer to soften the aesthetic. She indicated this was an urban setting with the building next to the street so delivery trucks would probably pull up to the door. The Council reviewed the landscaping plan and indicated there was a need for more colorful and varied landscaping on the west elevation, additional landscaping between the sidewalk and drive aisle to soften the effect, and better pedestrian connection. Ms. Alexander explained it was important for the landscaping to remain low to screen the building base and not block signage /windows. In addition, they needed to leave room to accommodate the sidewalk expansion to eight feet. Ms. Alexander stated the Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 Centennial Lakes landscape architect prepared the plan to repeat the established France Avenue landscape theme. The Council addressed the limited ability for a pedestrian or bicyclist to safely access the Starbucks site. Mr. Carlson stated this shopping center was built in 1988 and does not have those types of pedestrian connections; however, this proposal would be a big improvement over what existed. Ms. Alexander noted this was one stretch of France Avenue that had sidewalks but the safest pedestrian passage was at the storefronts. Mr. Carlson mentioned they would also request a bus stop. The Council indicated the City was trying to engage the street in a more effective way to create an urban presence, and discussed alternate building orientations that would result in the dining area engaging France Avenue rather than the parking lot. Ms. Alexander explained that drive through vehicles would not block the dining area window, as vehicles stack prior to the pick up window; moving the pick up window to the other side would result in cars stacking in front of Old Navy and impact the ability to park cars close to the building /providing safe pedestrian passage into the building; and, moving the patio to the other end of the building would impact leasing of the Old Navy location. Ms. Alexander explained one project cannot solve every issue, but she found this to be a good design. It v ^t-°'- the ether nt -atien o the Sun en the dining and patio spaces. Member Bennett stated that she liked the location of the patio on the east side of the building because it would be warmed by the morning sun but shielded from the hot afternoon sun. Laura Lamberg, representing Starbucks, advised the preliminary schematic showed 30 -35 seats. She advised that Starbucks currently had 55 stores, 25 with drive throughs but it wanted drive throughs at all of its stores. Ms. Lamberg indicated they had not considered gas use or pollution as a concern because it was only 45 seconds from order to pick up. With the traffic on France Avenue, Starbucks found a drive through at this location was important for convenience of its customers. It was noted that Starbucks had previously closed a location in Edina that did not have a drive through. Mr. Carlson pointed out a drive through also addressed safety of its customers, especially those with children who would not need to bring them into the store or leave them in the car. This was a convenience and enhancement for many of its customers. The Council raised the option of providing additional landscaping to separate the six parking spaces from the dining area and provide more intimacy for those diners. Mr. Carlson stated a decorative railing or planter boxes could be installed; however, some customers like an urban feel, energy, and excitement, and prefer to not be hidden away. The Council agreed that more landscaping was needed since the building design did not well address the Comprehensive Plan in building design and engagement of France Avenue. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. Public Testimony Bob Aderhold, 3529 West 54`h Street, addressed the Council, to ask about bicycle parking facilities. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Tony Heppleman, WSB, representing the proponent, noted the location of a bicycle rack near the outdoor seating area. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -156, approving Site Plan at 7501 France Avenue to build a 1,750 sq. ft. Starbucks, based on the following findings: Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinance for a Site Plan. 2. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. 3. The revised lane for the drive - through window would provide adequate stacking space, and would not interfere with traffic on France Avenue. And subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 18, 2012 • Grading plan date stamped October 18, 2012 • Landscaping plan date stamped October 18, 2012 • Building elevations date stamped October 22, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. S. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated November 8, 2012; with the exception that the required sidewalk improvements per the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvements (an 8 -foot wide sidewalk) shall be completed on the site within 10 years of the Site Plan approval or when the France Avenue sidewalks on the adjacent properties to the north and south are installed, whichever comes first. 6. The bicycle rack shall be moved to the northeast side of the building, north of the east entrance door. 7. Enhanced landscaping in three areas: 1) along the western elevation of the building; 2) between the drive aisle and the sidewalk along France; and 3) around the outdoor eating area. The enhanced landscaping shall be subject to staff approval, and must include color. 8. A formalized Proof of Stacking Agreement that is filed with the property. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ms. Alexander presented the building materials board, noting it was identical to the building materials presented to the Planning Commission. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, thanked residents of 52 "d and Abbott and the Minneapolisait neighborhood associations that networked with Edina to stop the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC)'s rerouting of air traffic over Edina without representation and prior to allowing community input. The Council thanked Jim and Lori Grotz for the e-mail that alerted the City of this situation. Bob Aderhold, 3529 West 54th Street, requested expansion of the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program to include residential projects. Marc Donnelly, 6821 St. Patricks Lane, indicated the St. Patricks Lane traffic study had been conducted late July, a time during which school was not in session and church activities were few. He requested a new traffic study be conducted during the school year. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. SPORT DOME RECOMMENDATION —RECEIVED Ms. Kattreh presented the study of the Park Board Sports Dome Working Group and recommendation of the Braemar Soccer Field as the site for further study for potential development of a sports dome, the need for funding of the renovation of the two rectangular fields at Pamela Park to be included in this project, and that the Cuningham Group,r„enande Anderson Johnson /Associates be hired to complete a site feasibility study of the Braemar Soccer Field. The Park Board also recommended that the forward motion of the dome not occur until the issue of expanded playing fields was addressed, solved, and budgeted. Ms. Kattreh suggested a temporary solution, if a dome was built, to increase field space through a swap between the Edina Football Association and Edina Soccer Club to move football to the turf field in the fall to free up the Lewis Park fields for soccer and allow the ability to rest one of the fields at Lewis Park. She noted there was also ability on the very westerly field at Lewis Park to run two soccer fields width wise, similar to that at Braemar, creating a soccer complex. It was noted the Public Works Director and maintenance staff had indicated this was a viable solution. The Council agreed there was a need to address the shortage of field space and potential for increased demand as additional sports become popular. Ms. Kattreh explained the swap was intended to be a temporary solution until the City was able to resolve the field shortage issue. She indicated it would be ideal if a field could be added to Pamela Park as studies had clearly indicated it was a need. The Council indicated support for the swap option, need to plan for the future with a broader vision, and preference to build to projected need rather than existing requests. Discussion ensued relating to use of Fred Richards Golf Course as an amenity (but not as a site for a dome) and possible turfing of McCarthy (school property), since it would be able to sustain three times more usage than a grass field, would fit the "do Town" initiative, and support youth activities. Ms. Kattreh stated the action requested by the Park Board was to further study the Braemar athletic sites by consultants used in the first two phases to determine the kind of dome, cost, and financial feasibility, (create a business model) conditioned on resolving the need for expanded playing fields. The Council supported a parallel track to also study needed hours, projected hours, and potential solutions to field shortages. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, receiving the Sports Dome recommendation conditioned upon studying the issue of expanded playing fields and financing for those expanded playing fields. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED — 5109 -5125 WEST 49TH STREET Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented a map of the subject site and the Sketch Plan request to redevelop three lots at 5109 -5125 West 49`h Street. The proponent proposed to tear down the existing two apartments and single - family home and build an 18 -unit attached housing development. The subject properties were 1.28 acres in size so the proposed density of the project would be 14 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan guides these properties as low density residential (1 -5 units per acre) and indicates over 12 units per acre was high density and between 5 -12 units per acre was medium density. Mr. Teague advised that on October 24, 2012, the Planning Commission considered the Sketch Plan proposal and determined it generally believed that a medium - density residential designation was more appropriate for the site than high- density residential. At the time of the Planning Commission's review, the vacated right -of -way adjacent to the site was not used in the density calculations. However, using that acreage, the site area would be 1.43 acres and the density would be 12.57 units per acre. Proponent Presentation Daniel Hunt, 6516 Interlachen Boulevard, President of Hunt Associates, stated they previously came forward with two other larger proposals that were abandoned due to finding no common ground with the Page .7 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 neighbors and receiving negative comments from the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Hunt stated the residential for sale market had dramatically improved, which was the genesis of this plan, a significant improvement on the existing buildings, answered opposition received relating to height of the building, traffic generation, and sunlight impact to the north. He noted some revisions had been made to the plan since Planning Commission consideration. In addition, as reported by Director Teague, they had approached the Canadian Pacific Railroad, owner of a 175 -foot strip of property to the west and learned it needed only a 100 -foot strip and was open to selling a portion, which would lower the density of this project to fewer than 13 42 units per acre. Chris Palkowitsch, architect with the BKV Group, presented a revised Site Plan, noting it better fit the project into the neighborhood by reducing the scale to smaller -sized townhomes and continuing a wider bicycle trail /pedestrian pathway in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Plan. Mr. Palkowsitsch indicated the project would include two types of townhomes: Type A abutting Vernon Avenue would be 2 -story units above grade; and, Type B along 491h Street were 2%: -story units and slightly recessed to grade. The project would comprise a total of 18 units with garages slightly set back to allow for guest parking (38 visitor stalls in total). Mr. Palkowsitsch presented elevations depicting project views, noting the base of the ridgeline would fit the residential homes on the north side. Exterior treatments would incorporate gables, dormers, and brick subject to additional study on materials within the neighborhood and market. The Council discussed the Site Plan and asked questions of the proponents. Mr. Palkowsitsch explained that a height of 2.5- stories would provide for the underground parking and enough living space. The current zoning allowed for40 35 feet at the ridgeline or 2.5 stories, whichever was less. The Type A units facing Vernon Avenue were 25 feet high but with the first level tucked under ground on the rear side to accommodate the 23 -foot grade change in topography. Mr. Palkowsitsch indicated exploration remained on water gardens, cisterns, and /or rain barrel collection. Mr. Palkowsitsch indicated the requested density allowed offset of major site costs related to topography and drainage. Mr. Hunt explained they had done little work on the architecture of the site, but all units would have large front porches and back decks, providing adequate programmed space. He pointed out this site was very unique with single - family homes to one side and non - residential uses on the Vernon Avenue side, requiring two faces. Mr. Hunt suggested that too much of a standard residential appearance would be out of place on the busy street and it would need more substance (architectural features) to hold its place. It was noted the eight larger units had a main floor master suite while the other units contained upper level bedrooms, allowing attraction of a different market. Following discussion, the Council indicated that townhomes provide a needed lifecycle choice and including -14 .15 acres from the railroad would be of benefit. It supported the proposed pathway, the attempt to engage Vernon Avenue, and found that creating housing along with commercial was intriguing. However, the Council indicated that 18 units created too high of a density for this site. Members Sprague and Swenson and Mayor Hovland stated a willingness to entertain a medium- density range to gain economic viability. Member Bennett stated her rationale to prefer a low- density range of 10 -12 units, as guided by the Comprehensive Plan, to allow creation of a buffer space /transition between the single family homes across the street and this project uses, aR ^^ #,,.,' ^^^^^r * ;^^ *^ the neighb^F"^ ^^', 'less impact on neighborhood streets, and improved quality of life. The Council found that additional green space and a common amenity would enhance the project. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-146 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -146 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -19 — AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF EDINA CODE CONCERNING BICYCLE LANES — ADOPTED Mr. Houle reviewed that at the September 4, 2012, meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2012- 17 amending Chapter 14 of the City Code to designate bike lanes on specific roadways. However, the new portion of Tracy Avenue was not included in that ordinance amendment. Attorney Knutson read the ordinance language related to definition of bicycle lanes indicating if there was no striping, it was not a bike lane. He recommended adding language to define the bike lane location. Member Bennett made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2012- 19, Amending Chapter 14 of the Edina City Code concerning Bicycle Lanes, revising 1420.01 (1) to indicate: Tracy Avenue from approximately 100 feet south of Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue." Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council agreed with the need to expediently address bicycle lane (yellow) striping on Wooddale Avenue so it could be completed when weather permitted, which would involve an additional federal approval process. Mr. Neal recommended that discussion be scheduled on December 18, 2012, which would provide staff enough time for better preparation and not impact syncing with federal approval if the Council determined to move forward. VIII. E. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-153 ADOPTED —TRACY AVENUE SPEED LIMIT Mr. Neal presented Resolution No. 2012 -153, a housekeeping measure to reduce the speed limit to 25 mph along Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue due to the establishment of bike lanes upon Tracy Avenue. being a designated bieyele ane. He indicated staff expected to receive a lot of resident feedback when this speed limit was reduced. Police Chief Long provided a differing opinion on lowering the speed limit to 25 mph based on the experience of the Police Department. and everall ^t it net as °4°6tive ber;a, ° Chief Long stated it diverted cut - through traffic to other narrow and highly populated residential streets. He indicated there was a 99% failure rate for bicycles to stop at stop signs and described the dangerous situation that existed on Warden and Johnson when traffic backed up at Vernon Avenue during peak hours. Chief Long indicated public safety had not provided input on these changes yet it had to deal with the impacts and unintended consequences on a daily basis. The Council discussed whether traffic diverted to avoid backed -up peak hour traffic and on Tracy Avenue the queuing lane to make a turning movement or the lowered speed limit. All agreed there were more deaths and greater risk of injury eyeF iRjU when a pedestrian was hit by a vehicle traveling 30 mph than 25 mph. In addition, Tracy Avenue was part of Safe Routes to Schools and eemplete tFe a school walkingshed that accommodated children on foot, and also led to a major park. Chief Long concurred that 25 mph was a safer speed for residential areas and while he was not opposed to reducing the speed limit, preferred a more uniform speed limit b'°^k °ted speed It was acknowledged that speeds on 70th Street were 38 mph pre - project construction and dropped to about 32 mph post construction following a period of time during which drivers adapted. The Council agreed that flow of traffic and longer queues at rush hour were the tradeoffs of complete streets that Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 20, 2012 lowered speeds to create calmness 'and a better /safer experience for pedestrians, bicyclists, and neighborhoods. Chief Long stated a. d there was a difference between .^what was seen when in a patrol card and what the Council was describing and wanted to happen. ' The Ge, ineill Member Bennett noted the City was developed with a street grid where some were through streets while others ended, not providing a parallel roadway to accommodate bicycle routes. Because of that, Wooddale was an essential bicycle route on the east and Tracy Avenue was the same on the west. The eptien was Faised to ;.,,..,,.,s„ safety Member Bennett asked that other measures be considered to diminish commuter use of side streets, perhaps limits on some turning movements during rush hours. The Council 'agreed that planning for bicycle and pedestrian facilities needed to consider the full street network and not unintentionally create conditions contrary to intent. Mr. Neal stated staff had discussed the need for a better system to get Public Safety entities involved through inclusion at ETC meetings when it reviewed and commented on design. The CGUAG" Feee,,nizea Mayor Hovland stated that Edina was a car centric community but that does not mean drivers do not have to behave in a civilized manner when adding other modes of travel and movement into the system. 4 -The Council supported enforcement measures when traffic exceeded the posted speed limit. The Council also acknowledged that vehicle drivers would adapt, given time, to lower speed limits. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -153 designating a 25 mph speed limit on Tracy Avenue between Benton Avenue and Vernon Avenue. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council requested that the ETC address and provide recommendation on establishing speed limits in a more comprehensive manner in partnership and cooperation with the Police Department. VIII.F. ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -20 — AMENDING CHAPTER I OF EDINA CODE CONCERNING COUNCIL SALARIES — TABLED TO DECEMBER 4, 2012 Member Swenson presented the draft ordinance that would increase Mayor and Council Member salaries to a median level, noting if adopted it would not go into effect until 2015. The Council discussed the mechanism approved in 2006 to review Council salaries based on non -union City staff. Following discussion, the Council asked staff to provide survey information that included comparison and contrast with other communities. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to table consideration of Ordinance No. 2012 -20, Amending Chapter 1 of Edina Code concerning Council Salaries, to December 4, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.G. 2012 MEETING DATES AND HOLIDAYS — APPROVED City Clerk Mangen presented and recommended approval of the 2013 calendar for City Council, Board, and Commission meetings, noting the new terms would start on January 7, 2013. Mr. Neal asked the Council to also consider canceling the July 2, 2013, meeting date. The Council discussed the July 2013 meeting schedule and consensus was reached to not schedule the July 2, 2013, meeting unless necessary. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the 2013 meeting dates as revised to include canceling the July 2, 2013, meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 10 :, Minutes /Edina City. Council /November 20, 2012 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. B. MINUTES 1. PLANNING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 10& 24, 2012 2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, OCTOBER 9, 2012 3. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, OCTOBER 1, 2012 Informational; no action required. W.C. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION— EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION :1. LIVING STREETS PROPOSAL Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X.A. REQUEST TO CREATE A .DESIGNATED COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVE POSITION — METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE — RESOLUTION NO 2012 -158— ADOPTED Member Swenson presented a resolution requesting c+ea#+eg a designated community representative position on the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise Oversight Committee (NOC). It was noted the NOC by -laws would need to be changed to allow Edina participation. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No..2012 -158, requesting the Metropolitan Airports Commission to create a Designated Community Representative position for the City of Edina on the Noise Oversight Committee. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XII. CLOSED SESSION OF CITY COUNCIL — POTENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to recess the meeting at 11:50 p.m. and move to closed session to consider potential real estate acquisitions. Ayes: Bennett; Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X11. ADJOURNMENT The regular session reconvened at 12:40; a.m. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett; to adjourn the regular session at 12:40 a.m. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried.. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 4, 2012. Video Copy of the November 20, 2012, meeting available. Page 11 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 20, 2012 5:11 P.M. CALL TO ORDER /ROLL CALL Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:11 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Brindle was absent and excused. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. Manager Neal stated the Council had indicated a desire to discuss the City's liquor ordinance and some potential areas that may need to be updated. Members of the Council indicated a desire to review the portion of the code that requires on -sale intoxicating liquor license holders to maintain a ration of liquor sales to food of 40/60. Staff presented a survey of 15 metro suburbs' sales ratios which showed Edina to have the lowest allowed percentage of alcohol to food sales. Discussion included: change in type of business with more small plates costing less than an expensive drink, patrons ordering one dinner and splitting it while each individual has their own beverage, would a change have an effect on enforcement, did the change in allowing "happy hour" change the sales ratios in the current license year. The Council indicated no desire to change the seating ratio or to allow games of skill beyond what has already been allowed. Staff was directed to gather more information and compile the reported sales of existing license holder when they submit their renewal documentation and bring the data back for a conversation in the early second quarter of 2013. Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief gave a presentation on rental housing. Mr. Scheerer stated the City adopted the International Property Maintenance Code in 2010 giving it the ability to investigate and control communicable diseases and regulate public and private housing. He explained the City responded to approximately 150 -200 complaints annually, typically regarding noise, maintenance or potential negative behavior of residents. The discussion following the presentation included concerns expressed by residents to Council members over maintenance of housing stock, number of cars parked adjacent to a residence, condition of exterior of dwelling and property, behavior of residents and tenants' issues with landlords. Council indicated that based on the number of calls to Council members; there may be more complaints than have been received by City staff. The Council expressed an interest in some form of mandatory registration of rental housing as a possible step in the direction of licensing. Staff will bring back to a Council a registration program for review and property owners and tenants were encouraged to contact the City regarding their views on a potential rental housing licensing program. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 4, 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CLOSED MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 20, 2012 11:50 P.M. CALL TO ORDER . Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 11:50 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Edina City Hall. He announced the purpose of the closed session was to allow the City Council to discuss potential real estate acquisitions ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Brindle was. .absent and a sed. Staff members present included Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, .City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; and Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager. Jack Rice, Real Estate Consultant was also present. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague to close the session. Ayes: Bennett; Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. City Manager Neal explained staff wanted to update the Council on the following properties: • Hooten Cleaners, 3944 West 49 Y2 Street • Nelsons Building, 3930 West 49th Y2 Street • Wolfson. Property, 3655 Hazelton Road City Staff, Jack Rice and the City Council discussed the possibility of the City acquiring each of these properties.. IDiscussion included potential public purposes, possibility of negotiated sales and potential fo use of eminent domain Dise ssien included the ^ ^t ^.,t;- l ff ge«,bl° °.,, nent dema.^ ^^t^^t„l .,,stir. ^„r ^d vWheth°• ° getiated sale w• uld be ^ ^"' ^r Following the discussion, Member Swenson made, a motion authorizing staff to negotiate for a potential purchase. Member Bennett seconded the motion. . Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague made a motion to recess the closed session at 12:40 p.m. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion. carried. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 4, 2012 t Page 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 21.50 CITY OF EDINA 365517 1112212012 Council Check Register 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 365512 1112212012 130923 24-7 POWER 365518 1112212012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 250.00 SERVICE CALL FOR PROGRAMMIN00001268 301715 1355 -001 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AFS- 223110008 1553.6530 250.00 13.43 365513 11/2212012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 1112212012 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 741.00 UB TEMP 301771 36676815 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111312 1318.6406 741.00. 254.07 365514 1112212012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 1112212012 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC 46.80 301632 3511255026 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 9361580 1400.6105 66.00 301633 1627722 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX #340587 1400.6105 51.20 301911 3511277028 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 164.00 - 365521 1112212012 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 365515 1112212012 129469 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 530.52 'FOOD 301561 1827420 5730.5510 5,141.26 WATER TREATMETNT PLANT #6 301955 37288963 05473.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1829884 5730.5510 5,141.26 365516 1112212012 131077 ALEXANDER, DONNA 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 1 Business Unit STREET EQUIPMENT GENERAL (BILLING) YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND- 301878 110712 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 21.50 365517 1112212012 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 63.44 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 301772 117589 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.44 365518 1112212012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 13.43 MIRROR 00005696 301879 AFS- 223110008 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 13.43 _- 365519 1112212012 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 254.07 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 301716 111312 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 254.07 365520 1112212012 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC 92.00 MEMBERSHIP - JAN RODRIGUEZ 301773 9361580 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 69.00 MEMBERSHIP - LAURENE DRAPER 301774 #340587 1400.6105 DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS 161.00 - 365521 1112212012 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 530.52 'FOOD 301561 1827420 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 544.54 FOOD 301562 1829884 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 61.25 FOOD 301563 1829883 5730.5510 787.00 FOOD 301969 1834049 5421.5510 1,923.31 365522 1112212012 130217 APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 495.00 AIR SAMPLING 301855 28684 7412.6103 495.00 365523 1112212012 131089 AQUATIC ROCK FORMATIONS LLC 12,935.00 WATERFALL RENOVATION 00002237 301970 PARTIAL PAYMENT 5700.1705 12,935.00 365524 1112212012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 368.88 COFFEE 301856 915876 7411.6406 368.88 365525 11/22/2012 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 207.77 CEILING TILES 00003892 301880 10053348 1470.6530 207.77 365526 1112212012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 326.75 20YD ROLLOFF 301529 1 -9640 1 -10/12 5511.6136 326.75 365527 1112212012 120995 AVR INC. 1,365.86 READY MIX 00005242 301717 71853 4416.1705 546.25 READY MIX 301718 72040 5913.6520 2,121.88 READY MIX 301718 72040 1314.6520 638.58 READY MIX 301719 72672 1314.6520 4,672.57 365528 11122/2012 102503 BAGS & BOWS 101.89 GIFT BAGS 00009214 301896 0090550658 5120.6406 101.89 365529 1112212012 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 176.00 GENERAL LABOR ISSUES 301564 107786 - 1120.6103 454.46 301565 107785 1120.6103 630.46 365630 11122/2012 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 159.51 PAINT 301530 00091691 5511.6406 Su6ledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 11/20/20131:57:54 Page- 2 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2011 GF SURPLUS BLDG UPGRADES CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11122/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No 5842.5515 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 5520.5510 5520.5510 1552.6406 7410.6513 5110.6513 1260.6107 1260.6104 47079.6710 4095.6103 1550.6043 1550.6040 11120120121:57:54 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST.OF GOODS SOLD MIX 159.51 - YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 365531 1112212012 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 53.27 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 301634 75832100 VERNON SELLING 316.18 YORK SELLING 301635 87576400 23.40 301636 87576300 394.65 301637 6266300 608.76 301638 75832000 675.35 301639 74534900 109.55 301640 75831900 661.35 301912 75940900 97.55 301913 75940800 2,940.06 365532 1112212012 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 22.50 WATER 301531 1053718 51:50 COFFEE, WATER 301532 1054038 150.95 COFFEE. 301720 1052220 224.95 365533, 1112212012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 137.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3D1857 OE- 302609 -1 33.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009212 301897 OE- 301779 -1 170.93 365534 1112212012 - 130569 BINTNER, ROSS 39.97 REIMBURSEMENT 301956 110912 155.00 REIMBURSEMENT 301956 110912 194.97 365535 1112212012 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 134,521.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 301961 110212 134,521.85 365536 1112212012 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL 301721 16 -1284 412.54 365537 11112212012 102645 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 16,712.50 PREMIUM 301601 DEC 2012 151,219.00 PREMIUM 301602 2012 i 167,931.50 5842.5515 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 5520.5510 5520.5510 1552.6406 7410.6513 5110.6513 1260.6107 1260.6104 47079.6710 4095.6103 1550.6043 1550.6040 11120120121:57:54 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST.OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK PATHWAY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11120/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 4 11/22/2012 - 11/2712012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365638 1112212012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 207.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003516 301881 81691 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 207.88 _ 365539 1112212012 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 18,332.80 PROSECUTING 301603 OCT2012 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 18,332.80 365540 1112212012 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 115.00 301641 110619 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 650.50 301914 110716 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 765.50 365641 1112212012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 464.82 SENDER, GASKET, RECEIVER 00005693 301722 686295 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 464.82 365542 1112212012 131067 BRETEY, SCOTT 174.79 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 301839 4949 POPPY LANE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 174.79 365543 1112212012 131073 BREUER, JIM 10.75 FALL CLASS REFUND 301846 110612 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 10.75 365544 1112212012 103239 GRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 598.81 DOOR REPAIR 00002337 301604 520004S 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 598.81 365545 11/2212012 122074 BUIE, BARB 5.00 PETTY CASH 301605 111312 5760.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 6.49 PETTY CASH 301605 111312 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 11.79 PETTY CASH 301605 111312 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 19.07 PETTY CASH 301605 111312 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 26.79 PETTY CASH 301605 111312 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 28.49 PETTY CASH 301605 111312 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 97.63 365646 1112212012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 135.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 301982 111912 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 135.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING Council Check Register 11/22/2012 -11/2212012 Check # Date i Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 365647 1112212012 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 34.85 301642 193719 5842.5515 13,774.80 301643 193718 5842.5514 694.15 301783 193717 5822.5514 584.00 301915 195549 5842.5514 15,087.80 365548 1112212012 131062 CARROLL, DAN 100.00 TALENT SERVICES 301606 110712 1130.6103 100.00 365549 1112212012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 1,054.00 301784 96896 5842.5513 810.00 301785 96912 5862.5513 1,864.00 365550 1112212012 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 301533 110112 5821.6186 23.11 301533 110112 5861.6186 26.94 301533 110112 5841.6186 34.06 301533 110112 5422.6186 52.14 301533 110112 1481.6186 75.80 301533 110112 5430.6186 139.92 301533 110112 5913.6186 174.01 301533 110112 5921.6186 186.19 301533 110112 5761.6186 213.20 301533 110112 5420.6186 329.58 301533 110112 5111.6186 381.92 301533 110112 1552.6186 508.32 301533 110112 1628.6186 599.49 301533 110112 1646.6186 1,127.55 301533 110112 5911.6186 ` 2,562.88 301533 110112 5511.6186 6,447.93 365551 1112212012. 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 2,482.12 301607 2505112 5720.6186 45.96 301608 2505582 5311.6186 2,528.08 365552 1112212012 123898 CENTURYLINK 11120/20131:57:54 Page- 5 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT - HEAT HEAT HEAT YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING BOTH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK FIRE STATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE DISTRIBUTION SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE WELL PUMPS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY 01- tDINA 11/20ieu121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 6 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 205.94 952 835 -6661 301723 6661 -11/12 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 107.25 952 835 -1161 301724 1161 -11/12 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 155.37 952 285 -2951 301775 2951 -11/12 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 58.28 952 9441841 301776 1841 -11/12 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 526.84 365553 1112212012 131071 CHAPURAN, KELLEN 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND 301843 110912 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 21.50 365554 1112212012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 243.45 301644 487092 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 243.45 365555 1112212012 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF 76.73 GOLF CLUB 301971 3886830SO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 76.73 365556 1112212012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 392.40 301916 0198114313 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 392.40 365557 11/2212012 120433 COMCAST 4.52 301566 23973 -11/12 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1.55 301567 220686 -11/12 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 6.07 365558 1112212012 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 883.66 CABLE TV I WEB 301568 OCT 2012 5662.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 883.67 CABLE TV / WEB 301568 OCT 2012 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 883.67 CABLE TV / WEB 301568 OCT 2012 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,651.00 365559 11/2212012 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 526.23 ASPHALT 00001837 301882 103112 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,469.42 ASPHALT 00001837 301882 103112 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 3,995.65 365560 1112212012 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 53.05 MATERIAL TESTING/INSPECTIONS 301569 P00000732 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 134.09 MATERIAL TESTING/INSPECTIONS 301569 P00000732 01382.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE 405.69 MATERIAL TESTING /INSPECTIONS 301569 P00000732 01368.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 11122/2012 — 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 669.45 MATERIAL TESTING/INSPECTIONS 301569 P00000732 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 1,262.28 365561 1112212012 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 73.83 POTTER'S TOOLS 301898 8200383475 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 73.83 366562 1112212012 123653 CROSSTOWN.CONCRETE 17,460.00 PAVER AND CONCRETE REPAIR 00002329 301609 110912 - 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 17,460.00 365663 1112212012 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 149.08 114 - 09855665-4 WATER 301858 103112 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 149.08 365564 11122/2012 131072 CURME, STACY 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND 301844 110712 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 21.50 365565 1112212012 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 6,208.80 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 301570 10278 5913.6103 .,_ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 6,208.80 365566 1112212012 104020 DALCO 128.83 GLASS CLEANER 301534 2532303 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 191.31 PUNCH DEGREASER 00005742 301725 2532454 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS .. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.82 TOWELS 00009208 301899 2531639 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 418.96 365567 1112212012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 4,220.55 301645 676568 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 90.10 301646 676567 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 88.70 301647 676564 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,938.60 301648 676565 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,200.10 301649 675620 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 483.10 301786 676566 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,021.15 365568 1112212012 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURAN 1,773.65 STD INSURANCE 301726 DEC 2012 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 1,773.65 R55CKREG LOG20000 A -244 TRACY AVE LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACYAVE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACYAVE Council Check Register 11/2212012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 365569 1112212012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 91.06 BAKERY 301535 433766 5421.5510 91.06 365570 11/2212012 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 12,489.33 OCT 2012 SURCHARGE 301957 15539053060 1495.4380 12,489.33 365571 1112212012 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 480.94 CARBIDE KITS 301727 802141614 1335.6406 721.41 CARBIDE KITS 301728 802141680 1335.6406 1,322.58 CARBIDE KITS 00001181 301729 802141250 1335.6406 810.11 STEEL SPACER KITS /CARBIDE KITS00001181 301730 802141204 1335.6406 1,820.83 PAINT 00001255 301731 802141653 1335.6532 698.96 PAINT 301732 802142078 1375.6406 5,854.83 365572 1112212012 123162 DISH NETWORK 111.78 8255 7070 8142 2839 301859 110412 7411.6406 111.78 365573 1112212012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 NOV MEETING 301610 32602 1130.6106 25.00 365574 1112212012 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 420.00 TOUR DE EDINA EVENT 301900 111612 1428.6010 420.00 365576 11/2212012 102956 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 120.88 10/7112 WESTWOOD HILLS TRIP 301777 12 -101 1629.6406 120.88 365576 1112212012 105906 EGAN COMPANY 6,952.60 INSTALL LOOP DETECTORS 00001382 301733 JC10074634 1553.6180 6,952.60 365677 1112212012 130604 EUREKA CONSTRUCTION 1,984.13 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 301962 110912 01244.1705.30 7,092.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 301962 110912 08058.1705.30 27,362.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 301962 110912 05526.1705.30 44,631.16 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 301962 110912 03472.1705.30 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/20/20121:57:54 Page- 8 PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A -244 TRACY AVE LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -58 TRACY AVE LIGHTING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACYAVE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACYAVE CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. Business Unit 48,600.61 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 301962 110912 04388.170530 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACY AVE 175,277.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 301962 110912 01368.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON 304,948.51 365578 1112212012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 74.81- CORE RETURN 301734 1- 4027849 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.78 BATTERY 00005659 301735 1- 4028585 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 234.82 GENERATOR 00005659 301736 6- 1304497 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 309.97 GENERATOR 00005659 301737 69-082454 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.19 BATTERY 00005659 301738 69- 082672 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.27 REMAN STARTER 00005659 301883 70- 123934 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 777.22 365579 1112212012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 182.46 CS BOLTS, BOXES 00001402 301571 0000429 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5,859.96 METERS 00001402 301572 0000407 5917.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES METER REPAIR 6,042.42 365580 1112212012 130699 FLEETPRIDE 452.59 MULTIFASTER,KITS 301739 50907284 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 452.59 365581 1112212012 131074 FLORA, TALLEY 10.75 FALL CLASS REFUND 301847 110612 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 10.75 365582 1112212012 101475 FOOTJOY 74.46 SHOES 301536 4664813 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.46 365583 1112212012 131059 FOSTER, ELIZABETH 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 301611 111312 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 365584 11/22/2012 131066 FOUNTAINWOOD CONDO ASSOC. 4,033.53 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 301778 ACCT #161239003- 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 4,033.53 365585 1112212012 131075 FRANGIPANE, BETH 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND 301848 110712 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 21.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20191:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 10 11/27/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365586 11/2212012 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 301972 1006201856 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.00 301973 1006224091 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 30.00 365587 11/2212012 123619 GENE'S WATER & SEWER INC. 83.44 PERMIT REFUND 301612 ED118000 1495.4114 HEATING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 83.44 365588 1112212012 127515 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 211.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 301613 111312 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 211.18 365589 1112212012 129797 GM CONTRACTING INC. 128,344.62 FINAL PAYMENT 301963 112112 05500.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -500 RAW WATER WELL7 TO WTP6 128,344.62 366590 1112212012 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,379.40 OCT TICKETS 00001403 301573 52413 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,379.40 365591 1112212012 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 311.54 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 301884 773 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 311.54 365592 1112212012 101103 GRAINGER 398.75 LIGHT REPAIR 00008000 301537 9957290191 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 146.76 PLATES, CUPS 00005662 301740 9967054983 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 10.00 FLASHLIGHTS 00005743 301741 9970908456 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 44.61 SAFETY GLASSES 00005743 301741 9970908456 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 83.79 CABLE PROTECTOR 301860 9974980253 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 683.91 365593 1112212012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 112.00 301917 00029281 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 112.00 365594 1112212012 120201 GRANICUS INC. 3,323.10 WEBSTREAMING 301538 39950 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,604.00- CREDIT 301539 103112 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,719.10 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 11 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA R65CKREG LOG20000 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES LAKE EDINA B Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 1112212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 365595 1112212012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 927.25 301787 146108 5862.5513 1,030.75 301918 146109 5842.5513 1,958.00 365596 1112212012 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 187.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001308 301574 125478 1314.6180 357.50 301575 125479 1314.6180 481.50 301576 125519 4091.6406 1,026.00 365597 1112212012 100788 H &L MESABI 9,440.91 SNOWPLOW BLADES _ 00005306 301742 86120 1553.6530 9,440.91 365598 11/22/2012 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 55.58 . BLACK DIRT, SOD 301743 103112 1301.6517 80.42 BLACK DIRT, SOD 301743 103112 1643.6543 143.74 BLACK DIRT, SOD 301743 103112 1314.6406 448.67 BLACK DIRT, SOD 301743 103112 5913.6406 728.41 365599 11122/2012 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 27.39 HUBS, LATH 00001754 301577 9034 013961705.31 27.40 HUBS, LATH 00001754 301577 9034 01397.1705.31 54.78 HUBS; LATH 00001754 301577 9034 01395.1705.31 219.14 HUBS, LATH 00001754 301577 9034 01393.1705.31 219.14 HUBS, LATH 00001754 301577 9034 01398.1705.31 547.85 365600 11122/2012 127602 HAROLD.J. PIETIG & SONS LLC 235.91 LOWER DRIVEWAY REPAIR 301578 5408 BROOKVIEW 01334.1705.21 235.91 365601 1112212012 125270 HARTFORD, - PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,297.05 DEC 2012 301836 6097569 -5 9900.2033.05 6.65 COBRA 301837 DEC 2012 1550.6043 5,303.70 365602 1112212012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,178.65 CHEMICALS 00005243 301579 3386177 5915.6586 2,039.14 CHEMICALS 00005243 301580 3403650 5915.6586 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 11 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION MATERIALS/SUPPLIES BRAEMAR HILLS C MATERIALS /SUPPLIES LAKE EDINAA MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BRAEMAR HILLS B MATERIALS/SUPPLIES MENDELSSOHN A MATERIALS /SUPPLIES LAKE EDINA B CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 12 11/2212012 —11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,217.79 365603 1112212012 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 169.08 PIPE 00001307 301581 5698757 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 169.08 365604 1112212012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 546.12 RADIO ADMIN FEE 301744 121038076 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 546.12 365605 1112212012 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 3,700.00 HARDWARE FOR CITYWORKS SERA @04374 301838 51945793 5930.1730 OFFICE FURN & EQUIPMENT STORM SEWER BALANCE SHEET 6,022.64 HARDWARE FOR CITYWORKS SER\EMH04374 301838 51945793 5900.1730 OFFICE FURN & EQUIPMENT UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 9,722.64 365606 1112212012 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 678.65 CLEANERS, FOAM WASH 00002239 301582 600464196 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 678.65 365607 1112212012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,502.00 301650 624001 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 84.00 301651 624002 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,587.00 301788 624286 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 637.50 301789 624092 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,810.50 365608 11/22/2012 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 6,302.07 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 301745 012 -042 -3 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH 6,302.07 365609 1112212012 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 1,703.00 MONITORING SERVICE 301540 3603810 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,703.00 366610 1112212012 131078 HUYNH NGUYEN, JUSTIN 37.50 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 301852 111312 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 37.50 365611 1112212012 130244 HYNEK, EVAN 37.50 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 301853 111312 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 37.50 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365612 1112212012 121629 ICLEI USA - LOCAL' GOVERNMENTS 600.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 301614 M2012 -4504• 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 600.00 366613 11/2212012 131084 INSOLIA, BETH, 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 301861 110612 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 98.00 365614 1112212012 125031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 33.70 ST PATRICK CHURCH AD 301541 1225394 -10/12 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 33.70 365615 11122/2012 124330 - JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 1,470.00 CRANE RENTAL. 301746 6687 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,470.00 366616 1112212012 100828 JERRY S FOODS 4.59 301615 103112 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44,62 301615 103112 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44,79 301615 103112 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 58.19 301615 103112 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.89 _ 301615 103112 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 139.78 301615 103112 1400.6104 CONFERENCES& SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 354.86 365617 1112212012 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 92.49 TOILET SERVICE 301974 60119 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 65.45 301975 60120 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 157.94 365618 11122/2012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 93.80 301652 1937333 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,057.05 301653 1937331 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 17.50- 301654 1925229 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 59.50- 301655 1924998 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 37.00- 301656 1924995 5822.5514 COST OF.GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21,20- 301657 1925243 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 41.80- 301658 1925239 5822.5514 COST OF, GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 83,25- 301659 1925247 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 72.50- 301660 1925246 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21,55- 301661 1925248 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 38.10- 301662 1925292 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20131:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 14 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 38.50- 301663 1925289 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 35.30- 301664 1924993 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 87.90- 301665 1924989 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3.05- 301666 1924979 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 100.30 301790 1937379 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,815.89 301791 1937378 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 126.06- 301792 1937380 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,383.83 301795 1435214 5862.5512 985.00 301796 366620 11/2212012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 759.83 301667 1429834 5822.5513 419.41 301668 1429836 5822.5513 1,211.63 301669 1429837 5822.5513 1.12 301670 1429831 5862.5515 120.12- 301671 554229 5842.5512 2.53- 301672 554228 5842.5512 15.78- 301673 554943 5822.5512 84.68- 301674 554226 5822.5512 97.07- 301675 554225 5822.5512 457.63 301793 1435229 5862.5512 6,139.99 301794 1435228 5862.5512 1.12 301795 1435214 5862.5512 985.00 301796 1435232 5862.5512 893.76 301797 1435234 5862.5512 740.60 301798 1431369 5842.5512 1.31 301799 1429825 5842.5512 2,927.96 301800 1429845 5842.5512 77.50 POPCHIPS 301862 1433490 5730.5510 365.88 301919 1435216 5842.5513 2.52 301920 1435212 5842.5512 15,111.40 301921 1435221 5842.5512 20.99 301922 1435226 5842.5513 3,419.24 301923 1435223 5842.5513 4,104.31 301924 1435225 5842.5513 1.12 301925 1435213 5842.5515 3,746.16 301926 1435224 5842.5512 1,143.68 301927 1435227 5842.5512 4,271.97 301928 1435222 5842.5513 1,929.61 301929 1435211 5822.5512 154.78 301930 1435218 5822.5512 193.80 301931 1435220 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING BOTH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 11/22/2012 — 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount' Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 12.85- 301932 555102 5842.5512 7.63- 301933 555100 5842.5513 11.03- 301934 555101 5842.5513 48,730.63 365621 11/2212012 100849 LAKELAND ENGINEERING 1,004.10 VALVES 00001350 301583 12255679 -01 5915.6530 1,004:10 365622 1112212012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 566.11 FITTINGS, ADAPTERS, SCREWS 00005721 301747 9301226011 1553.6530 566.11 366623 1112212012 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 599.93 SAND 301976 BRAEMAR - FISCHER 5422.6517 10/12 1,284.42 TOPSOIL 301977 OCT312012 5422.6543 1,884.35 365624 1112212012 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 2,655.00 AED /CPR TRAINING 00001387 301748 LL -4549 1281.6104 2,655.00 365625 1112212012 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 752.60 RESCUE TUBES, WHISTLES 301584 INVO86423 5311.6406 30.28 LIFEGUARD HIP PACKS 301585 1WO88939 5720.6406 782.88 365626 11/2212012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 221.55 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 301885 111612 1400.6406 221.55 365627 1112212012 131063 LLOYD'S CYLINDER HEAD REPAIR 1,173.24 CYLINDER HEAD REPAIRS 301749 10826 1553.6530 1,173.24 365628 1112212012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 2,146.36 301676 142261 5842.5515 2,146.36 365629 1112212012 120742 M. MILLER TRUCKING INC. 522.00 TRANSPORT SCREENER 301750 18120 1301.6180 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 16 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 522.00 365630 1112212012 130155 MACDONNELL, STEPHEN 324.00 MODELING 301901 111612 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 324.00 365631 1112212012 131081 MAO, GUGHE 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 301863 111512 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 98.00 365632 1112212012 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 320.00 HOSTING FEE 301616 176 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 320.00 365633 1112212012 128428 MARVIN, KRISTINE 10.75 FALL CLASS REFUND 301645 110612 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 10.75 365634 1112212012 105297 MAYER ELECTRIC CORP. 4,340.00 GENERATOR FOR PROJECT 301542 100619 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,340.00 366636 11/22/2012 131057 MCFILINO LAKES 675.00 WORK CREW SERVICES 301543 106507 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 675.00 WORK CREW SERVICES 301864 108132 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,350.00 365636 11124/2012 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 374.03 BELTS 301586 2584031 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 494.42 BOILER LEAK REPAIRS 301587 2584084 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 868.45 365637 1112212012 103944 MED COMPASS 13.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 20.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 39.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 65.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 104.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 104.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 169.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES 8 MAINTENANCE 520.00 HEARING TESTS 301909 20466 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 — 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount. Supplier /_Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 28.00 HEARING TESTS, 301910 20486 5910.6103 2800 HEARING TESTS 301910 20486 1644.6103 1470.4329 1646.6406 5422.6406 5511.6406 1552.6103 1400.6230 1495.4307 1553.6530 01382.1705.30 5311.6103 5510.6103 5913.6180 5913.6180 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 17 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,194.00 365838 1112212012 131060 MELANDER, SHIRLEY 387.17 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 301617 111312 387.17 365639 11122/2012 101483 MENARDS 20.24 WRENCH, SCREWS 00001223 301751 7204 127.35 ANTI- FREEZE, HEET 00006285 301978 9234 147.59 366640 1112212012 100885 METRO SALES INC 490.11 COPIER USAGE 301544 484909 2,645.44 COPIER USAGE 301588 481850 2,277.10 COPIER USAGE 301886 485740 5,412.65 366641 1112212012 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 234,135.00 OCT 2012 SAC CHARGES 301589 111312 234,135.00 365642 1112212012 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 54.22 KIT 00005698 301887 482374 54.22 365643 1112212012 100891 MIDWESTASPHALT CORP. — 294,478.78 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 301964 112112 294,478.78 365644 11/2212012 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 40.00 BOILER FEE 301866 ABR00583241 150.00 PRESSURE CHECKS 301867 ABROO595701 190.00 365645 .1112212012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,102.50 CURBSTOP REPLACEMENT 00001401 301590 34233 1,102.50 GATE VALVE REPAIR 00001404 301752 34238 2,205.00 365646 1112212012 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 1470.4329 1646.6406 5422.6406 5511.6406 1552.6103 1400.6230 1495.4307 1553.6530 01382.1705.30 5311.6103 5510.6103 5913.6180 5913.6180 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 17 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 46.89 CO2, METHANE 301865 171052695 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 46.69 365647 1112212012 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT.INC. 21.38 WINDOW WASHING 301958 928004026 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16.09 301959 928004027 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 37.47 365648 1112212012 117357 MINNESOTA DAILY, THE 126.88 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 301618 LR5023 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 126.88 365649 1112212012 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 C LICENSE FEE 301591 DAN HEINZMANN 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 365650 1112212012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 173.96 STEEL REPAIR 00005725 301888 0096736 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 173.96 365651 11/22/2012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 2,182.93 BEARINGS, SEALS, BELTS 00006002 301979 880799 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,182.93 365652 1112212012 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 455.45 FILTER WORK AT MELODY LAKE 301592 1660 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 455.45 365663 11/2212012 129580 NELSON, JAMIE 37.50 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 301851 111312 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37.50 365664 1112212012 131088 NICHOLSON, KYLE 150.00 ART CENTER REPAIRS 301902 111612 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 150.00 365655 1112212012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 238.68 UNIFORMS 00002338 301619 945344790 5761.6201 LAUNDRY 238.68 365656 11/2212012 131087 NIKONOV, ELENA 162.50 ART WORK SOLD 301903 111412 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 11/20/20131:57:54 Page Business Unit PSTF FIRE TOWER YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PONDS & LAKES LIQUOR INSPECTION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 220.00 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 365659 11122/2012 121497 NORTHWESTASPHALT INC. Council Check Register Page- 19 1,882.34 FINALPAYMENT 1112212012 — 11/22/2012 112112 05523.1705.30 Cheek # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 162.50 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 03469.1705.30 365657 1112212012 2,873.25 131078 NORDSTROM, NICK 301965 112112 01400.1705.30 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND 301850 110912 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 21.50 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 01401.1705.30 365658 1112212012 13,512.20 131080 NORRGARD, LOIS 301965 112112 01386.1705.30 220.00 RENTAL REFUND 301854 111312 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS POLAR CIRCLE VIKING HILLS GLACIER PLACE VERNON CT & VERNON HILLS GLEASON COURT VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD VIKING HILLS GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 220.00 365659 11122/2012 121497 NORTHWESTASPHALT INC. 1,882.34 FINALPAYMENT 301965' 112112 05523.1705.30 2,599.64 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 01402.1705.30 2,770.33 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 03469.1705.30 2,873.25 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 01400.1705.30 5,128.35 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 01403.1705.30 6,732.54 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 01401.1705.30 13,512.20 FINALPAYMENT 301965 112112 01386.1705.30 14,466.52 FINAL PAYMENT 301965 112112 04385.1705.30 49,965.17 365660 1112212012 118639 NORTHWEST LASERS INC. 95.00 NON- WARRANTY REPAIR 301593 5100054370 1260.6406 95.00 366661 1112212012 130141 DENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 130.25 301801 963 5822.5513 130.25 365662 11/2212012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 19.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 301545 1521989482 5410.6513 10.62 SHIPPING 301546 1521976260 5440.6122 30.00 365663 1112212012 130454 OVEN HEARTH WHOLESALE BAKERY 34.36 CONEY BUNS 301547 319078 5520.5510 34.36 CONEY BUNS 301548 319128 5520.5510 68.72 365664 11122/2012 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 301620 47100 5761.6230 720.75 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS POLAR CIRCLE VIKING HILLS GLACIER PLACE VERNON CT & VERNON HILLS GLEASON COURT VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD VIKING HILLS GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 365665 1112212012 PAPCO INC. 131086 PADILLA, EDUARDO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 110.12 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 133.00 110.12 301868 365666 11122/2012 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 133.00 9,446.69 FINAL PAYMENT 14,731.88 FINAL PAYMENT 11/2212012 18,810.93 FINAL PAYMENT PAUSTIS & SONS 218,678.50 FINAL PAYMENT 261,668.00 2,771.61 365667 1112212012 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 8374309 -IN 23,292.77 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 4,465.84 68,152.53 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 301802 148,198.76 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 422,012.81 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 661,656.87 8375547 -IN CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register .11/2212012 —11/22/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 301904 ACCT 306725005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 301966 112112 301966 112112 301966 112112 301966 112112 301967 110912 301967 110912 301967 110912 301967 110912 366668 1112212012 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 129486 PAPCO INC. YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 133.00 TOWELS, CLEANERS, SPRAY 301868 74745 133.00 365669 11/2212012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,771.61 301677 8374309 -IN 4,465.84 301802 8375521 -IN 118.25 301803 8375547 -IN 264.75 301804 8374985 -IN 1,101.55 301805 8375534 -IN 264.75 301806 8374987 -IN 8,986.75 365670 1112212012 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 619.30 301678 07761522 224.26 301869 07787644 843.56 365671 1112212012 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 4,317.50 FINE GRADE, TURF REPAIR 301753 180 4,317.50 365672 11122/2012 131083 PESCHEL, PETER 03468.1705.30 05522.1705.30 04384.1705.30 01385.1705.30 05525.1705.30 03471.1705.30 04387.1705.30 01388.1705.30 7411.6511 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLEANING SUPPLIES 11/20/201211:57:54 Page - 20 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/2212012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 301870 110612 5511.6136 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES 11120/20131:57:54 Page - 21 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 98.00 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 365673 1112212012 VERNON SELLING 119372 PETSMART#463 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 52.55 K9 SUPPLIES 00003104 301621 T-5179 4607.6406 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 52.55 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 365674 1112212012 216.94 100743 PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRITS 210028371 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,300.79 506.83 210032648 301679 2330146 5822.5513 1,517.73 59.02 301680 2330151 5822.5513 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 156.48 301681 2330150 5822.5513 666 5410.6575 553.86 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 301682 2330145 5822.5512 404.70 301807 2333900 5862.5512 2,703.38 301935 2333896 5842.5513 228.48 301936 2333892 5842.5513 2,999.28 301937 2333898 5842.5513 2,153.01 301938 2333897 5842.5512 297.62 301939 2333894 5822.5512 21.94- 301940 3493950 5842.5513 7.58- 301941 3493949 5842.5513 3.33- 301942 3493948 5842.5513 10,029.81 365675 1112212012 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 280.00 301943 16786 5842.5515 280.00 365676 1112212012 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 144.60 REPAIRS 00006003 301980 51689789.001 5422.6180 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES 11120/20131:57:54 Page - 21 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 144.60 365677 1112212012 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 4,295.63 PLANT MAINTENANCE 301594 313084 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,295.63 365678 1112212012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 216.94 TIRES 00005633 301754 210028371 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,300.79 TIRES, MOUNTIDISMOUNT 00005659 301889 210032648 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,517.73 365679 11122/2012 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 1,772.10 2013 PATRON CARDS 00006094 301755 666 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CITY OF EDINA EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,772.10 365680 11/2212012 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 69.84 622833 WATER 301595 622833 -10-12 5720.6406 69.84 365681 1112212012 131076 PRENTICE, STEPHEN 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND 301849 110712 5511.6136 21.50 365682 11/2212012 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 108.00 BLADE SHARPENING 301549 262110 5511.6406 108.00 365683 11122/2012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 301.33 GLOVES, WIPES, LINERS 00008008 301550 5812 5511.6511 426.74 FOAM CLEANER, LINERS 00002240 301596 5806 5720.6511 617.43 ICE MELT 00002235 301872 5808 5720.6406 524.39 TOWELS, GLOVES, LINERS 00002241 301873 5813 5720.6406 1,869.89 365684 1112212012 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 474.56 POWER OUTAGE REPAIR 301871 61140 5511.6180 474.56 365685 11/22/2012 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 644.68 ZAMBONI SUPPLIES 301551 0050998 -IN 5511.6406 644.68 365686 1112212012 131068 RADABAUGH, JOHN 97.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 301840 6705 VERNON AVE 5900.2015 97.72 365687 1112212012 131061 RAINDROP IRRIGATION SERVICES L 195.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 301622 EDINBOR PARK 5720.6180 195.00 365688 1112212012 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 980.00 REPAIR PROMENADE FIXTURES 00002342 301779 96901 5765.6180 980.00 365689 1112212012 131069 REFINED LLC Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 22 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description' 81135 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 301641 4222 ALDEN DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 81.35 365690 1112212012 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 50.36 SOFTENER SALT 301756 00275779 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.36 365691 1112212012 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 89.25 VALVE HANDLE 00005691 301890 00000070000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 89.25 365692 1112212012 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 303.00 DUES - JENNIFER BE14NEROTTE 301623 1442 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 303.00 365693 1112212012 104939 RUBY TUESDAY 1,579.93 DEPOSIT REFUND 301757 101612 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE 1,579.93 365694 1112212012 117807 SAM'S CLUB 19.32 TRAINING FACILITY SUPPLIES 301875 SOUTH METRO 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 35.00 TRAINING FACILITY SUPPLIES 301875 SOUTH METRO 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 131.67 TRAINING FACILITY SUPPLIES 301875 SOUTH METRO 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 185.99 365695 11122/2012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 441.49 101 """'9350 301552 TELEVISION 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.84 101 - """9350 301874 111312FOOD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 492.33 365696 1112212012 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 545.04 QUARTERLY BILLING 301905 8103299027 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 545.04 366697 1112212012 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 604.50 VEBA/FSAADMINISTRATION 301891 008816- NOV2012 1550.6200 INSURANCE 604.50 365698 1112212012 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 184.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 301960 110812 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 184.93 11/20/201211:57:54 Page - 23 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CITY HALL GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 365699 1112212012 VERNON SELLING 131082 SIEMON, KELLEY VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 93.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 301876 111512 5511.6136 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 93.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 365700 1112212012 50TH ST SELLING 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 50TH ST SELLING 85.50 TIME CARDS 301553 65044 5510.6406 37.41 TIMECLOCK FEE 301597 65109 5310.6105 122.91 365701 1112212012 131070 SOREM, GRACE 21.50 FALL CLASS REFUND 301842 110912 5511.6136 21.50 365702 1112212012 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 926.72 REFRIGERATOR MAINT CONTRACT 301554 33371 5421.6230 926.72 365704 1112212012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 267.12 301684 1944182 5842.5512 465.00 301685 1940677 5822.5513 1,793.50 301686 1920323 5822.5513 1,723.00 301687 1940697 5822.5513 241.00 301688 1930452 5822.5513 310.50 301808 1940714 5842.5513 523.00 301809 1940681 5842.5513 978.60 301810 1967422 5842.5512 7,088.40 301811 1944123 5842.5512 1,879.08 301812 1967418 5842.5512 88.50 301813 1940711 5822.5513 2,891.50 301814 1940712 5862.5513 337.50 301815 1940702 5862.5513 109.00 301816 1930451 5862.5513 3,021.40 301817 1944120 5862.5512 407.75 301818 1967420 5862.5512 4,011.51 301819 1967416 5862.5512 5,922.32 301820 1920349 5862.5513 7,046.00 301944 1920371 5842.5513 1,720.50 301945 1940713 5842.5513 597.44 301946 1967417 5822.5512 244.65 301947 1967421 5822.5512 41,667.27 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 11/2u, i2l1:57:54 Page - 24 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register t 11/22/2012 -11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description' 365705 11/2212012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 559.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001344 301758 52627203.001 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 559.44 365706 1112212011 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 41.76 KEYS FOR SHELTERS 00007163 301892 902369146 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.76 365707 11122/2012 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 700.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 301598 A13318908 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 700.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 301598 A13318908 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 700.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 301598 A13318908 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,100.00 365708 1112212012 101015 STREICHERS 85.99 UNIFORM 301624 1971887 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 25.62 NAMEPLATE 301780 1972595 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 139.99 SHIRT CARRIER 301893 1973172 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 251.60 365709 1112212012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,057.29 VEHICLE REPAIRS 301759 619019 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,057.29 365710 1112212012 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 272.21 TIRES 00005699 301894 10113479 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES 272.21 366711. 1112212012 118760 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INC. 61,996.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT N0: 1 301968 112112 01245.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 61,996.05 365712 1112212012 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.72 PHONE LISTING 301760 110412 5861.6188 TELEPHONE . 42.74 PHONE LISTING 301760 110412 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 42.74 PHONE LISTING 301760 110412 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 128.20 365713 1112212012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 789.00 301689 007478 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,716.00 301690 007469 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 591.00 301691 007314 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 11/20/20131:57:54 Page - 25 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN A -245 HANSON RD RETAINING WALL VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20ieu1211:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 26 11122/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,096.00 365714 1112212012 131085 SWEENEY, KEVIN 25.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 301906 111512 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH8FRANCE MAINTENANCE 25.00 365715 11/2212012 106673 TAPCO 13,624.43 SOLAR MESSAGE BOARD 00001277 301761 1406728 4416.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2011 GF SURPLUS BLDG UPGRADES 13,624.43 365716 1112212012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 35.30 301692 721749 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 35.30 365717 11/2212012 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 996.70 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 301981 3000289029 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 996.70 365718 11122/2012 120595 T MOBILE 42.62 SURVEY PHONE 301599 102712 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 42.62 365719 1112212012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 42.04 WELDING TANKS 301625 450698 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 31.53 WELDING GAS 301762 450697 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.57 365720 1112212012 124763 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 225.14 COPIER USAGE 301877 215648528 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 225.14 365721 1112212012 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 301600 28373 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 301600 28373 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 301600 28373 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.75 365722 1112212012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 12.23 OIL FILL CAP 00005191 301763 M102148 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 186.90 GEAR 00005414 301764 M102366 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.05- RETURN TINES 301765 JC07177 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 147.08 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 11/22/2012 —11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount'_ Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 366723 1112212012 131065 UMR GEOTHERMAL 1,605.00 PURGE AND FILL LOOPFIELD 00001226 301766 5970 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,605.00 . 365724 1112212012 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,797.45 UNIFORMS 301626 OCT 2012 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,477.04 CARTRIDGES 301626 OCT 2012 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,012.71 EXPLORERS UNIFORMS 301627 138271 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 5,287.20 366725 11122/2012 125032 UNI- SELECT USA 1,137.48 AUTO PARTS 301628 103112 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,137.48 365726 1112212012 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 310.15 CONDUIT, SEALS 00001333 301907 607464 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 310.15 365727 11122/2012 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 18300 PAGERS 301629 V0319246K 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 183.00 366728 1112212012 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 627.40 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 301781 25474400 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 332.33 LIQUOR BAGS 00007511 301908 254723 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 959.73 366729 1112212012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 56:78 PULL LINE 00001376 301767 6834019 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 56.78 365730 11122/2012 119454 VINOCOPIA 244.00 301693 0066434 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 244.00 365731 1112212012 100423 WACONIA FARM SUPPLY 31.90 THROTTLE CABLE 00001159 301768 76732 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.90 365732 1112212012 130574 WATSON COMPANY 1,944.58 CONCESSION PRODUCT 301555 OCT 2012 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,944.58 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 28 365733 1112212012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 881.90 301821 315086 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 294.30 301822 314986 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 294.30 301823 314984 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 458.30 301824 315085 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,024.75 301825 315087 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 488.25 301826 314985 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,441.80 365734 1112212012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 4,209.24 301694 430912 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 912.00 301695 430999 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 325.60 301948 432032 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,343.81 301949 431962 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 180.00 301950 431198 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 80.00 301951 431200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,050.65 365735 11/2212012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,027.86 301696 131827 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,103.06 301697 131828 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 71.95 301698 131829 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 188.65- 301699 872090 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 48.65- 301700 871737 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,466.35 301827 135297 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,413.00 301828 135295 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 264.00 301829 133530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 61.93 301830 135302 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,292.31 301831 135300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 96.99 301832 135301 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,689.68 301833 135303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD,WINE YORK SELLING 55.95 301834 135304 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1.15- 301835 872091 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,895.94 301952 137105 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,616.10 301953 135298 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35,816.67 365736 11122/2012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 184.60 301701 980804 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 348.75 301702 981440 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 11/20/20121:57:54 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Page - 29 Council Check Register 11/2212012 -11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 301703 981441 .5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,028.00 301704 981442 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 72.00 301705 11912 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 231.00 301706 982046 5842.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,388.85 301707 982047 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 43.00 301708 982048 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 360.00 301709 980803 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 301710 980802 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,566.06 301711 981053 5862.5514 COST OF GOOD'S ISOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 301712 981054 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,772.75 301713 981030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,662.35 301954 984270 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,698.07 22,376.96 365737 1112212012 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.50 301714 67022 5862.5513 81.50 365738 1112212012 101726 XCEL ENERGY LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 1,208.72 51- 5847121 -5 301556 346414864 5914.6185 5,076.64 51- 5888961 -7 301557 346414639 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 7,270.48 51- 6824328 -7 301558 346431630 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 301559 346396172 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 630.64 51- 4197645 -8 301560 346417535 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7,360.52 51-6121102 -5 301630 346917400 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 6,427.68 51-5619094-8 301769 346911305 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 41.54 51- 5276505 -8 301782 346919740 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 30,844.48 51- 5665640 -1 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,050.88 51- 6227619 -3 301895 347111706 60,911.58 366739 1112212012 100568 XEROX CORPORATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 202.48 OCT USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 301631 064664951 1550.6151 202.48 365740 1112212012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24,774.60 UNLEADED GAS / DIESEL 301770 523736 1553.6581 24,774.60 365,741 1112212012 131090 ABDULLE, ABDULLAHI 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302006 112012 173.06 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 30 11/2212012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365742 1112212012 131091 ABENA, STACY 177.94 ELECTION JUDGE 302007 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.94 365743 11/2212012 123475 ABRAMOVITZ, USHA 97.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302008 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 97.50 365744 1112212012 104517 ACKER, RITA 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302009 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 365745 1112212012 108555 ALT, JOHN 180.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302010 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.38 365746 1112212012 104518 ANDERSON, CAROLYN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302011 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 366747 1112212012 130719 ANDERSON, MARY LOUISE 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302012 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365748 1112212012 131092 ANDERSON, NOAH 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302013 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365749 1112212012 131093 ARONSON, JOHN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302014 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365750 1112212012 131094 BARNES, ABIGAIL 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 302015 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 365751 1112212012 108557 BAULEKE, CHRIS 121.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302016 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 121.88 365752 11122/2012 127094 BECKER, MARY 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302017 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20131:57:54 R55CKREG LOG20000 - Council Check Register Page - 31 1112212012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 143.81 365753 11/2212012 104598 BEUERLEIN, CYNTHIA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302018 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365754 11122/2012 106479 BOEMER, JULIET L. 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302019 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 365755 11122/2012 127096 BOOK, MARY 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 302020 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 365756 1112212012 130720 BOOK, RAYMOND 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302021 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION -- 146.25 365757 1112212012 116939 BORGEN, HOLLY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302022 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365768 1112212012 104580 BRADBURY, KATHERINE 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302023 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 244.69 365759 11/2212012 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302024 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 199.69 365760 1112212012 106482 BRELLENTHIN, ADELE 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 302025 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 365761 1112212012 123152 BROWER, KATHY 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302026 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 365762 1112212012 106485 BURNETT, JAMES H. 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302027 . 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 R55CKREG LOG20000 146.25 CITY OF EDINA 302030 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION Council Check Register 146.25 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 365763 11122/2012 123153 BUSDICKER, HARRIET 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302028 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 165.75 365764 1112212012 106487 CALGREN, MARY C. 365767 11/2212012 131095 CARDWELL, LINDA 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302029 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 148.69 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302032 365765 11122/2012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE 11/20/20121:57:54 Page- 32 Business Unit ELECTION ELECTION 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302030 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365766 1112212012 104584 CARDLE, JOHN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302031 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365767 11/2212012 131095 CARDWELL, LINDA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302032 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365768 1112212012 117116 CARLSON, JOHN 153.56 ELECTION JUDGE 302033 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 153.56 365769 1112212012 127412 CARLSON, NANCY 177.94 ELECTION JUDGE 302034 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.94 365770 1112212012 117117 CARLSON, SANDRA 225.00 ELECTION JUDGE 302035 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 225.00 365771 1112212012 129678 CARPENTER, JANE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302036 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365772 1112212012 104524 CARROLL., PAULINE 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302037 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 365773 11/22/2012 123156 CHRISTIANSEN, MARILYN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302038 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1, Explanation Council Check Register 146.25 Page - 33 365774 1112212012 - 11/22/2012 114404 CIPOLLA; JUDY PO # Doc No 180.38 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account'Description Business Unit 180.38 112012 365775 1112212012 ELECTION 104586 CONLEY; KATHERINE 112012 1180.6013 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302041 112012 168.19 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365776 1112212012 112012 104526 COOKE, EILEEN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 302044 365777 1112212012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104527 CRACRAFT, JOHN 302045 112012 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 302046 146.25 1180.6013 365778 1112212012 302047 104528 CRACRAFT, MARIAN 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 1180.6013 146.25 ELECTION 366779 1112212012 104529 CREW, COLLEEN 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 233.44 365780 11122/2012 127416 DALE, BYRON 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 365781 1112212012 127415 DALE, JUDITH 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 151.13 365782 1112212012 131096 DALLMAN, ANGELA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 366783 11122/2012 .104530 DANIELSON, GLORIA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 33 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account'Description Business Unit 302039 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302040 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302041 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302042 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302043 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302044 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302045 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302046 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302047 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302048 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 365784 1112212012 131097 DAVIS, ALEX 11/22/2012 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE PO # Doc No 165.75 Account No 365785 1112212012 302049 105069 DAWSON, PAT 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.03 ELECTION SUPPORT 112012 1180.6013 168.03 ELECTION 365786 1112212012 1180.6013 120361 DEAN, FRED ELECTION 302052 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 112012 365787 1112212012 ELECTION 108564 DEBERG, GLORIA 112012 1180.6013 270.00 ELECTION JUDGE 302055 112012 270.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 366788 11122/2012 112012 131098 DEEDS, CONNOR SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 302058 365789 11122/2012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 123158 DEMAREST, AMY 302059 112012 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 160.88 365790 1112212012 106513 DEZELLER, DELPHA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 365791 1112212012 104531 DILL, PATRICIA 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 239.06 366792 11122/2012 130722 DIMMOCK, JOHN 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 156.00 365793 1112212012 120362 DOMKE, LISA 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 136.50 365794 11/2212012 130723 DONOVAN, WENDY 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 11/20/20131:57:54 Page - 34 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11122/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302049 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302050 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302051 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302052 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302053 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302054 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302055 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302056 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302057 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302058 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302059 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/20/20131:57:54 Page - 34 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 R56CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 35 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 151.13 365795 1112212012 108565 DOUGLAS, SUZANNE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302060 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365796 1112212012 127084 DUHN, SHEILA 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302061 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 365797 1112212012 123161 DUNN, SALLY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302062 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 365798 1112212012 130724 EBERLEIN, EMMA - 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302063 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 365799 1112212012 130725 EBERLEIN, ERIKA 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302064 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 366600 1112212012 123164 EIDAM, DON 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302065 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 366801 1112212012 120520 EIGEN, RITA 107.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302066 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 107.25 365802 1112212012 120545 ELLINGBOE, ANNA 224.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302067 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 224.25 365803 1112212012 127420 ENGEBRETSON, JEANENE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302068 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 366804 1112212012 116947 FALKMAN, KURT 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302069 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 36 11/2212012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365805 11122/2012 131099 FARAH, MAHAMED 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302070 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 365606 1112212012 116948 FIEDLER, BOB 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302071 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365807 1112212012 104534 FINK, PAUL 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302072 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 199.69 365808 1112212012 131100 FLESHER, MOLLY 180.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302073 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.38 365809 11122/2012 116950 FLOR, ARDELLE 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302074 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365810 1112212012 106527 FLORENZANO, JOSEPH 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302075 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365811 1112212012 127086 FOSSUM, JOHN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302076 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 365812 1112212012 123167 FREY, GINNY 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302077 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 213.75 365813 1112212012 105393 FREY, KATHERINE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302078 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365814 1112212012 130726 FULUVAKA, SUZANNE 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302079 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365815 1112212012 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE 281.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302080 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount ; Supplier/ Explanation Council Check Register 281.25 Page - 37 365816 1112212012 — 1112212012 120241 GIESEKE, DANIEL PO # Doc No 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 146.25 112012 365817 1112212012 ELECTION 116951 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH 112012 1180.6013 272.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302083 112012 272.81 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365818 1112212012 112012 103889 GRETTE, MYRTLE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.38 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 180.38 302086 365819 1112212012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 117132 GRIES, PATRICIA 3D2087 112012 177.94 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 302088 177.94 1180.6013 365820 1112212012 302089 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE III 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 1180.6013 146.25 ELECTION 366821 1112212012 124340 GRIMES, DORIS 153.56 ELECTION JUDGE 153.56 365822 1112212012 130587 ' GROTE, DARCY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 365823 1112212012 106510 HABECK, MUZA 168.19. ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 365824 11/2212012 123501 HAGEDORN, LYNNE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 365825 11/2212012 106566 HAMAN, EUGENE E. 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 196.88 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register i Page - 37 1112212012 — 1112212012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302081 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302082 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302083 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302084 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302085 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302086 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 3D2087 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302088 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302089 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302090 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20191:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 38 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365826 1112212012 120269 HANSEN, BRIAN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302091 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365827 1112212012 117134 HANSEN, JUDITH 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302092 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365828 1112212012 131101 HANSEN, RACHEL 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302093 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365829 1112212012 106570 HANSON, JOAN B. 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302094 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 366830 11/2212012 120372 HARRIS, GEORGE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302095 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 365831 1112212012 108570 HARTFELDT, SHAWN 121.86 ELECTION JUDGE 302096 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 121.88 365832 1112212012 120244 HASNUDEEN, BUDDY 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302097 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 365833 1112212012 120245 HASNUDEEN, MARY 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302098 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 365834 1112212012 123603 HATZUNG, LISA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302099 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365835 1112212012 123504 HAYDOCK, CHERIE 180.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302100 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.38 365836 1112212012 127079 HIED, SHARON 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302101 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount `, Supplier 1. Explanation - 146.25. Council Check Register 365837 1112212012 Page - 39 106676 HELEY, CHERYL 11/22/2012 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 136.50 Inv No 365.838 1112212012 Subledger Account Description 131102, HIGGINS,ABIGAIL 302102 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE , SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 302103 365839 1112212012 1180.6013 127429 HIGGINS, JAMES ELECTION 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 170.63 ELECTION 365840 1112212012 112012 130728 HOLST, ALAN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES. 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 143.81 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365841 1112212012 302107 105396 HOPF, NANCY 1180.6013 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302108 146.25 1180.6013 365842 1112212012' ELECTION 117139 HOPPE, JUDY. 112012 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 146.25 112012 365843 1112212012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 108573 HUDOBA, TERRI 302111 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 202.50 365844 1112212012 131103 HUNT, MAGGIE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 365845 1112212012 131104 HUSSEY, CONOR 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 366846 1112212012 106397 HYKES,,MYRA 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 199.69 CITY OF EDINA 11/20120121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 39 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302102 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302103 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302104 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302105 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES. ELECTION 302106 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302107 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302108 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302109 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302110 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302111 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365847 1112212012 130730 JELLEN, ROSEMARY 153.56 ELECTION JUDGE 302112 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 153.56 365848 1112212012 104606 JOHNSON, KATE 286.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302115 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 286.88 365849 11/22/2012 131105 JOHNSON, LAURA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302113 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365850 11/2212012 106600 JOHNSON, SHIRLEY M. 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302114 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 366851 1112212012 123510 JOST, MARCE 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302116 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 244.69 365852 1112212012 106608 KACHAN, MARY K. 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302117 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365853 1112212012 131106 KAJER, MARGARET 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302118 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365854 11122/2012 106538 KAPAUN,ANN 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302119 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 365866 1112212012 123613 KAT7, DALIA 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302120 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365856 1112212012 116349 KAY, KATIE 138.94 ELECTION JUDGE 302121 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.94 365857 1112212012 106539 KEENAN, ANN 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302122 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/20/20121:57:54 Page - 40 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier. / Explanation Council Check Register P 199.69' Page - 41 365858 1112212012 —11/22/2012 123176 KELLAMS, LOUISE PO # Doc No I 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description B Business Unit 170.63 112012 1 365859 11/22/2012 ELECTION 131107 KERR, NATALIE 112012 1 1180.6013 S 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE, 165.75 365860 1112212012 116954 KETCHUM, KATHERIN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 365861 1112212012 131108 KIKER, SHARON 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 i 365862 11122/2012 131109 KIM, MIRIAM - 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 365863 1112212012 106640 KINGSTON, JESSICA 241.88 ELECTION JUDGE 241.88 365864 11122/2012 106541 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 148.69 365865 1112212012 131110 KNUTSON, MARY 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 365866 1112212012 105399 KOESTER, MARCIA 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 227.81 365867 1112212012 106543 KOPP, JANET 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 E 302125 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302126 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302127 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302128 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302129 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302130 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302131 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302132 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 1 11/20/20131:57:54 Council Check Register P Page - 41 11/22/2012 — —11/22/2012 PO # Doc No I Inv No A Account No S Subledger Account Description B Business Unit 302123 1 112012 1 1180.6013 S SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES E ELECTION 302124 1 112012 1 1180.6013 S SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES E ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 42 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365868 1112212012 106645 KOSTERS, JULIA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302133 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365869 11122/2012 120381 KOUATLI, MARTHA 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302134 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365870 11/2212012 130764 KOUDSI, HANA 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302135 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 365871 11122/2012 123177 KRINSKY LEON, KAREN 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 302150 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 365872 1112212012 131111 LAHAYE, KATELYNN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302136 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365873 1112212012 131112 LAIR, CASSIDY 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302137 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 365874 11/2212012 123179 LANDBERG, JAMES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302138 ` 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365875 11/2212012 106550 LANDBERG, MARY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302139 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365876 1112212012 121626 LANE, PAUL 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302140 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365877 11122/2012 123180 LANZ, KAREN 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302141 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 365878 1112212012 127437 LAPPIN, GERTRUDE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302142 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation Council Check Register. 165.75 Page - 43 365879 11/2212012 - 11/22/2012 131113 LARREA, NATHAN PO # Doc No 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 160.88 112012 365880 1112212012 ELECTION 123181 LARSEN, KRISTINE 112012 1180.6013 131.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302145 112012 131.63 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365881 11/2212012 112012 130765 LARSON, BARBARA SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 175.50 302147 365882 1112212012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 131114 LAUER, WYATT 302148 112012 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 302149 170.63 1180.6013 366883 1112212012 302151 131115 LAWYER, GEORGIA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 1180.6013 168.19 ELECTION 366884 1112212012 1180.6013 123182 LEER, BONNIE ELECTION 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 160.88 365885 11/2212012 130766 LEMMER, KELSEY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 365886 1112212012 123522 LEWIS, DIXIE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 365887 11122/2012 123523 LINDSAY, SUSAN 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 163.31 366888 1112212012 127104 LOEWENBERG, ELLEN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE' 148.69 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register. Page - 43 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302143 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302144 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302145 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302146 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302147 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302148 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302149 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302151 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302152 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302153 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 44 11/2212012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365889 1112212012 127089 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 302154 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 365890 1112212012 120249 LUCAS, WILLIAM 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 302155 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 365891 1112212012 130767 LUNDHOLM, KAREN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302156 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365892 11/2212012 131116 MACINNES, GABRI 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302157 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365893 1112212012 123183 MAEDER, BARBARA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302158 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365894 1112212012 108574 MAETZOLD, LINDA 153.56 ELECTION JUDGE 302159 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 153.56 365895 11122/2012 108575 MAHONEY; JILL 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302160 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365896 1112212012 131117 MALONE, ZACHARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302161 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365897 11122/2012 131118 MANION, CHARLES JOHN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302162 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365898 1112212012 130768 MAZZARA, PAT11 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302163 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365899 11122/2012 131119 MCCLURE, PAUL 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302164 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20131:57:54 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 45 11/22/2012 — 11122/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 170.63 365900 1112212012 131120 MCCOLLOW, MEG 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302165 112012 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.86 365901 1112212012 106586 MCFARLANE, BARBARA 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302166 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 244.69 365902 11/2212012 106589 MCGOLDRICK, FRANCIS 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302167 112012 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365903 11122/2012 106592 MCHENRY, JOY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302168 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365904 1112212012 127092 MCMILLAN, JOAN - 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302169 112012 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 365905 1112212012 104647 MELICHAR, MARGARET C. 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302170 112012 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 365906 1112212012 104612 MELLER, JANE 119.44, ELECTION JUDGE 302171 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 119.44 365907 1112212012 120250 MENZEL, MARVIN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302172 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365908 1112212012 104548 MERRITT HOLMES, PAT 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302173 112012 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.36 365909 1112212012 103848 METIL, LUANA 118.44 ELECTION JUDGE 302174 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 119.44 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 46 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365910 11/22/2012 127087 MILLER, KAREN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302175 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365911 11127/2012 116961 MILLER, NANCY 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302176 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 365912 11/2212012 127090 MOBERG, JANET 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302177 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365913 1112212012 131121 MOHAMUD, OMAR 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302178 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365914 1112212012 106606 MONTEZ, PATRICIA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302179 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365915 1112712012 104551 MONTGOMERY, BETH 194.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302180 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 194.06 365916 1112212012 131122 MOOTY, ALI 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302181 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365917 1112212012 131123 MOYNIHAN, CAROLINE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302182 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365918 1112212012 131124 NAYMAN, CHRISTINE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302183 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365919 11122/2012 120393 NAZARUIN, BARBARA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302184 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365920 11122/2012 131125 NEALON, SARAH 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302185 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount. Supplier/ Explanation Council Check Register 170.63 Page - 47 365921 1112212012 - 11/22/2012 131126 NELSON, BERT PO # Doc No 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 173.06 112012 365922 11122/2012 ELECTION 103669 NELSON, PAULA 112012 1180.6013 525.92 ELECTION, JUDGE 302187 112012 525.92 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365923 1112212012 112012 131127 NICHOLAS, HALLE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 302191 365924 1112212012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN 302192 112012 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 302193 222.19 1180.6013 365925 1112212012 302194 121126 NYBERG, ABIGAIL 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 1180.6013 160.88 ELECTION 366926 1112212012 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 267.19 ELECTION JUDGE 267.19 365927 1112212012 131128 OLSON, BREA 180.38 ELECTION JUDGE 180.38 365928 11/2212012 130769 OLSON, MARDE 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 227.81 365929 1112212012 120264 O'NEILL; ORDELL 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 365930 1112212012 131129 OPP, JENNA 170.63 . ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 CITY OF EDINA 11/20120121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 47 1112212012 - 11/22/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302186 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302188 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302187 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302189 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302190 112012. 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302191 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302192 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302193 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302194 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302195 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 48 11/22/2012 -11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365931 11122/2012 123194 OWENS, NORMAN 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302196 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 365932 11122/2012 106632 PATE, MARY 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 302197 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 365933 11122/2012 106631 PAULSON, DARLA J 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302198 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365934 11/2212012 120256 PEARCE, JEAN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302199 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 366935 1112212012 123195 PEARCE, WAIN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302200 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365936 1112212012 131130 PECK, ALAN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302201 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365937 11/22/2012 127099 PETERMANN, HEATHER 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302202 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365938 1112212012 120257 PETERSON, JOHN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302203 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 366939 1112212012 131131 PETRY, ALEX 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302204 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 365940 11122/2012 116967 PLATT, DOUGLAS 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302205 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.50 365941 11122/2012 104556 POLLITT, BETTY 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 302206 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20181:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 49 11122/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 148.69 .365942 11/2212012 104618 PRESTHUS, LINDA 131.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302207 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 131.63 365943 1112212012 131132 PROBST, CAROLINE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302208 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365944 1112212012 120400 QUINN, JOYCE 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302209 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365945 1112212012 120259 REED, ROBERT 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302210 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365946 1112212012 130770 REHM, ERIC 153.56 ELECTION JUDGE - 302211 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 153.56 365947 1112212012 106564 ROBERTSON, LOIS M 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302212 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365948 1112212012 106275 RODGERS, JUDITH 205.31 ELECTION JUDGE 302213 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 205.31 365949 1112212012 127081 RODGERS. WILLIAM 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302214 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365950 11122/2012 122600 ROE, JOAN 160.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302215 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.38 365951 11/2212012 130771 ROSENTHAL- ERICKSON, LUANN 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302216 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20120131:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 50 11/22/2012 - 11/2212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365952 11/2212012 130772 ROTHE, CAROL 131.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302217 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 131.63 365953 1112212012 123537 RUSH, MILAGROS 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302218 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365954 1112212012 131133 RUWE, CAROLINE 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302219 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 365955 11/2212012 105405 RYAN, MARY E. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302220 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365956 11122/2012 123199 SAWATZKY, RANDY 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302221 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 365957 1112212012 106587 SCHRAMM, CONSTANCE E. 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 302222 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365958 1112212012 131134 SCHREINER, AUNDRIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302223 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365959 11122/2012 116970 SCHWIEBERT, SARA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302224 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365960 11/2212012 121624 SCOFIELD, CRAIG 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302225 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 365961 11/2212012 131135 SEATON, HILORY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302226 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 365962 1112212012 127100 SEDOFF, MARILYN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 302227 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Cheek # Date Amount. Supplier l Explanation Page - 51 168.19 —11/2212012 365961 1112212012 PO # Doc'No 106585 SELID; MARION P. Account No Subledger Account Description 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 1180.6013 143.81 ELECTION 365964 1112212012 1180.6013 127095 SEWELL, KATHERINE ELECTION 302230 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 112012 365965 11122/2012 ELECTION 108588 SHAUGHNESSY, THOMAS 112012 1180.6013 121.88 ELECTION JUDGE 302233 112012 121.88 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365966 1112212012 112012 121625 SHEA, LINCOLN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 19.50 302236 365967 11122/2012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 131136 SHULL, MARY 302237 112012 146:25 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 146.25 366968 1112212012 124803 SKELLY, MICHAEL 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE. 165.75 365969 1112212012 130774 SKIBBE, MARGARET 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 148.69 365970 1112212012 123204 SKOY, MARY 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 141.38 365971 1112212012 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 239.06 365972 11/22/2012 127097 SMITH, SUSAN 146.25 -- ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20121:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 51 11/27/2012 —11/2212012 PO # Doc'No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit i 302228 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES - ELECTION 302229 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES.TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302230 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302231 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302232 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302233 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302234 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302235 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302236 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302237 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 365973 1112212012 106612 STALPES, GAIL 11/22/2012 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE PO # Doc No 19.50 Account No 365974 11/2212012 302238 123208 STEBLAY, VIVIAN 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 112012 1180.6013 165.75 ELECTION 365975 11/2212012 1180.6013 131137 STONE, JAN ELECTION 302241 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 - 365976 1112212012 ELECTION 106622 STRANG, LEE M 112012 1180.6013 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302244 112012 146.25 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 365977 11/2212012 112012 123209 SWANSON, ANN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 302247 365978 11/22/2012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 123210 SWEET, PHILOTHEA 302248 112012 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 141.38 365979 1112212012 108593 THOMPSON, ANN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 365980 1112212012 131138 THOMPSON, ELIZA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 365981 11/2212012 131139 TIGELAAR, MARIE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 365982 1112212012 123211 TREMMEL, DONNA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 365983 1112212012 106629 ULVIN, JANET M 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 11120/20121:57:54 Page- 52 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/22/2012 - 11/22!2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302238 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302239 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302240 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302241 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302242 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302243 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302244 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302245 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302246 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302247 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 302248 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11120/20121:57:54 Page- 52 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20131:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 53 11122/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Und 239.06 365984 1112212012 131140 ) URBAN, PETER 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE' 302249 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 365985 1112212012 104626 VANEK, MARY 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE', 302250 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP. EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 365986 1112212012 131141 VANHOVE, JULIE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302251 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 i 365987 1112212012 104627 VAURIO, PATRICIA 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302252 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.50 365988 1112212012 116979 VOSS, RAY 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 302253 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 365989 11122/2012 120521 WADDICK, LOUANN 250.31 ELECTION JUDGE 302254 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250.31 365990 1112212012 131142 WAGENAAR, BRIAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302255 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 365991 1112212012 129679 WALDIN, DEB 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302256 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 4 365992 1112212012 130776 WALLANDER, DONNA 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 302257 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 365993 1112212012 106638 WASHBURN, VIRGINIA 219.36 '' ELECTION JUDGE 302258 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11120/20131:57:54 Council Check Register Page - 54 11/22/2012 - 11/22/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365994 1112212012 116981 WEBER, JENNY 168.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302259 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.75 365995 11127/2012 108597 WEEKS, DEANNA 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 302260 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 213.75 365996 11/22/2012 123212 WEHRMEISTER, PAUL 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302261 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365997 11/2212012 130777 WENGER, WAYNE 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302262 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 365998 1112212012 106640 WESTERDAHL, BIRDIE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 302263 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 365999 11/2212012 104630 WEXLER, ARDIS 112.13 ELECTION JUDGE 302264 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 112.13 366000 11/2212012 130778 WOLFF, ELIZABETH 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302265 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 366001 1112212012 116984 WOOD, LINDA' 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 302266 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 366002 11/22/2012 123217 WOXLAND, KATHRYN 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 302267 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 366003 1112212012 130779 WU, GEORGE 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 302268 112012 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 366004 1112212012 104634 YEE, MARY 112.13 ELECTION JUDGE 302269 104634 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R556KREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 112.13 366005 1112212012 131143 ZHOU, ANNA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 158.19 366006 1112212012 127101 ZIERDEN, DEBORAH 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 175.50 366007 11122/2012 111696 ZVERINOVA, MARGARET 63.38 ELECTION JUDGE 63.38 2,931,736.16 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/27/2012 —1112212012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302270 112012 1180.6013 302271 112012 1180.6013 302272 112012 1180.6013 Payment Instrur Check Total Total Payments SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION •lent Totals 2,931,736.16 2,931,736.16 11/20120131:57:54 Page - 55 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/20/20122:00:59 Council Check Summary Page - 1 11/2212012 - 11/22/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 591,107.13 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,370,962.06 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 250.00 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 235.91 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,274.13 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 875.97 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 17,682.22 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 15,765.12 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 42,285.24 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,319.91 05800 LIQUOR FUND 245,380.46 05900 UTILITY FUND 397,358.07 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 234,232.27 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,936.97 09900 PAYROLL FUND 7,070.70 Report Totals 2,931,736.16 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll9les and procedures date,_ I 1 111-1 l s R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/27/2012. — 11129/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 366008 1112712012 105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 312.00 BAL DUE - EDINA SR CENTER 302530 ORDER#463774 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 312.00 366009 1112912012 131158 A MORRELL TRUCKING INC 3,000.00 EXCAVATION AND BACK FILL 00002330 302608 516962 5750.1720 BUILDINGS 3,000.00 366010 11129/2012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 741.00 UB TEMP 302342 36702059 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 741.00 366011 1112912012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 72.40 302273 1629426 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 59.60 302439 6611292026 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 132.00 .366012 1112912012 122056 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. 44.50 DECALS 00003517 302515 186724 421480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 44.50 366013 - 11129/2012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 40.61 DEF FLUID 00005730 302343 AFS- 223210005 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 40.61 366014 1112912012 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 80.00 IAFCI MEMBERSHIP 302344 112012 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 80.00 366015 1112912012 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 245.00 RADIO REPAIRS 302516 33312 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 245.00 366016 1112912012 131167 ANTOM OTTERDAHL INC. 1,006.21 DRIVEWAY REPAIR 302609 6412 GLEASON CT 01401.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,006.21 366017 1112912012 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC 69.00 MEMBERSHIP - TAUNYA HEGYI 302517 ID#358661 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 69.00 366018 11129/2012 100644 BARRETT MOVING AND STORAGE 11/28/20127:47:50 Page- 1 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET GENERAL (BILLING) VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GLEASON COURT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING ACCT #110762005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 11/27/2012 - 11129/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 794.00 MOVE ELECTION EQUIPMENT 302345 8283- 2453 -2/1 1180.6103 801.55 794.00 302349 WO- 808047 -1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 366019 1112912012 65.70 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 302519 OE- 301747 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 21.32 BATTERIES 302346 018 - 280435 1400.6406 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 87.58 BATTERIES 00001442 302347 018 - 286081 1646.6406 108.90 366024 11129/2012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 366020 1112912012 102580 BELL LUMBER & POLE COMPANY 12.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 7,075.13 LIGHT POLES 00001346 302348 INV24419 1647.6103 17.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7,075.13 81921 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 366021 1112912012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 81921 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 82.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302274 75940600 5842.5515 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 284.05 47.21 302275 75940500 5842.5512 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.95 302276 87613900 5822.5515 81921 1552.6406 223.51 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 302277 6268500 5862.5515 49.92 302278 87614000 5862.5515 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 252.85 302638 75940700 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 2 Business Unit ELECTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 366022 1112912012 131149 BELSHEIM, JEFF 55.57 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 302518 ACCT #110762005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 55.57 366023 1112912012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 801.55 SHREDDER 302349 WO- 808047 -1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 65.70 LABELS 302519 OE- 301747 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 32.03 PENS, MESSAGE FLAGS 302520 OE- 302635 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 899.28 366024 11129/2012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 12.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 81921 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 81921 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 17.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 81921 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 81921 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 47.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 81921 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 60.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 302350 81921 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 191.14 366025 1112912012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 18.38 HOSE 00005727 302351 690546 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG .LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page- 3 11/27/2012 - 11129/2012 Check #: Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation- PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description '- _ Business Unit 191.35 PASS- THROUGH 00005727 302352 690548 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,832.66 AIR�COMPRESSOR SEAL 00005727 302353 690539 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.98 GOVERNOR, GASKET_ S 00005727 302354 690627 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 139.26 COOLANT 00005732 302355 691383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.15 SENDER- 00005734 302356 691743 1553:6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENTOPERATIONGEN' 6.28 GASKET, CONNECTOR 00005733 302357 691675 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 170.62 VALVE 00005734 302358 691665 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.12 MANIFOLD 00005734 302359 691737 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.50 ANTIFREEZE 00005736 302521 691806 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT - PERATION GEN 2,652.30 366026: 11129/2012 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 3;568.25 MATERIALS TESTING 302522 362201 01382.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE 4,835.50 MATERIALS, TESTING 302523 362200 01368.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON 276.50 MATERIALS,TESTING 302524 361245 01238.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 2,806.15 GUN CLUB RAP & SPECIFICATION 302525 360921 05535.1705.20 _ CONSULTING DESIGN. PW BRAEMAR SITE LEAD ABATEMENT 11,486.40 366027 1112912012 103239 BRIN;NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 366.00 INSTALLNEWWWINDOW, 00001408 302360 520123S 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 366.00 INSTALL NEW WINDOW : °00001408 302361 520124S 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES, 732.00 366028 1112912012 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 1,494.11 NEWSLETTER 302526 29690 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,494.111, 366029 1112912012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 66.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 302665 112612 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 60.00 366030 11/29/2012 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/6/12 302341 112012 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER_, EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200:00 366031 1112912012- 106153 CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN INC. 4,056.38 DEPOSIT REFUND 302362 111912 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 4,056.38 366032 11129/2012 106153 CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN INC. 5,791.64 LICENSE RENEWAL REFUND 302363 LICENSE NO. 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 50320 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 5,791.64 366033 1112912012 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10,040.74 LEGAL 302527 2851- OOOG68 1195.6131 10,040.74 366034 1112912012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 17.65 302440 00010377 5822.5515 687.40 302441 00010376 5822.5514 1,962.45 302442 00010378 5842.5514 2,667.50 366035 1112912012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 240.00 302279 96911 5822.5513 222.00 302443 96954 5042.5513 462.00 366036 1112912012 131146 CAVALLO, PAUL 1,306.64 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 302528 112112 1470.4329 1,306.64 366037 11129/2012 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.87 9546705 -6 302364 9546705 -11/12 5911.6186 706.36 8034001 -1 302365 8034001 -11/12 1552.6186 61.67 5596524 -8 302529 5596524 -11112 5430.6186 780.90 366038 1112912012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 421.97 ENVELOPES 302366 70675 1550.6406 421.97 366039 11/2912012 123898 CENTURYLINK 59.33 952944 -6522 302367 6522 -11/12 5511.6188 59.33 366040 11129/2012 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 207.45 302280 487403 5862.5514 71.00 302282 487408 5822.5514 278.45 366041 11129/2012 101803 CITY OF BURNSVILLE 230.00 POWER LIMITED TECHNICIAN CLASS 302531 PART 2 2012 5410.6104 11/28/20127:47:50 Page- 4 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL HEAT WELL PUMPS HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 302281 1982 Council Check Register 356.80 11/27/2012 — 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 230.00 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 366042 1112912012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 317.80 4,534.80 00103426- 0345052006 302368 345052006 -11/12 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 412.11 00105263- 0335037016 302532 335037016 -11/12 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER 4,946.91 366046 366043 1112912012 105693 CITYSPRINT 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 11/28120127:47:50 Page- 5 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 30.38 COURIER FEE 302369 2739D 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 30.38 366044 1112912012 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK PRINTING ELECTION CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 356.80 302281 1982 5862.5514 356.80 366045 1112912012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 317.80 302283 0178021205 5862.5515 317.80 366046 1112912012 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 47.07 MATERIALS TESTING/INSPECITONS 302533 P00001139 01238.1705.21 137.35 MATERIALS TESTING/INSPECITONS 302533 P00001139 01382.1705.21 157.78 MATERIALS TESTING /INSPECITONS 302533 P00001139 01368.1705.21 342.20 366047 1112912012 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE 17,310.00 REPLACE BRICK PAVERS 00002510 302534 50TH & FRANCE 4090.6406 17,310.00 366048 1112912012 131144 CULLIGAN -METRO 142.00 101 - 10156610 -3 WATER 302535 860032 01388.1705.20 142.00 366049 11129/2012 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 320.63 VOTER RECEIPT PADS 302370 289766 1180.6575 320.63 366050 1112912012 104020 DALCO 49.41 TOWELS 00009208 302536 2533474 5111.6511 49.41 366051 1112912012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK PRINTING ELECTION CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CITY OF EDINA 11/28/2ui27:47:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,123.10 302284 677476 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 302285 677477 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,278.60 302444 677473 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 22.40 302445 677475 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,468.90 366052 1112912012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 97.50 BAKERY 302537 434646 5421.551U COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.96 302538 434922 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 10.56 302610 434922 -1 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.02 366053 1112912012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 153.47 302611 650487671 -11/12 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 153.47 366054 1112912012 121646 DICK, KENNA 50.40 CONFERENCE MEALS' 302371 112012 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.40 366055 1112912012 129062 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 512.35 ARCHITECTURAL FEES 302372 0051639 5750.1720 BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET 512.35 366056 1112912012 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 107.28 OCT 2012 WASHES 302373 5270 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.28 366057 1112912012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 30.00 EMERGING LEADERS MEETING 302539 32648 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 30.00 366058 1112912012 105875 EDINA EATERY INC. I PICKERMAN' 255.00 BOX LUNCHES 302374 2249 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 255.00 366059 1112912012 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 218.12 WINE FOR ROTARY EVENT 302375 12 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 218.12 WINE FOR ROTARY EVENT 302375 12 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 218.12 WINE FOR ROTARY EVENT 302375 12 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 654.36 RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 7 11/27/2012 — 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 366060 71/29/2012 165224' EDINA`P_OLICE RESERVES 1,470.00 SPECIAL EVENT. SECURITY 302612 112612 1428.6010 SALARIES'REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 1,470.00 366061 1112912012 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 9,526:37 T-90 REPAIRS 302540 64295 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9,526.37 366062 1112912012 131154 EUGENE PETERSEN ESTATE 131.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 302541 ACCT#201131006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 131.72 366063 1112912012 - 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 7,875:00 ROW ACQUISITIONS 302542. 00 -10542 10044.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB 7,875.00 366064 1112912012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 82:29 BULBS, FILTERS 00005659 302376 69- 083159 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.86 PARTS . 00005659 302377 69- 083358 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.86 PARTS 00005659 302378 1- 4037860 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.91 SENSOR 00005659 302379 69- 083458 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 204.83 BATTERY 00005659 .302380 1- 4038862 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.92- CREDIT 00005659 302381 69- 083510 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN, 464.83 366065 11129/2012 . i 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 147.82 SAW 302613 MNSTU44626 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 147.82 366066 1112912012 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 180:18 CARD PRINTING 00006364 302543 62200028537 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 180.18 - 366067 1112912012. 126004 . FERGUSON WATERWORKS 190,682.53 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 302544 113012 05536.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER METER REPLACEMENT 190,682.53 366068 1112912012 116492 FINANCE'AN15 COMMERCE 113.17 AD FOR BID 302614 10169506 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 113.17 366069 1112912012. 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - e 11/2712012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 425.00 ROWAY 302545 2458393 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 366070 11129/2012 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 336.00 302286 5402 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 80.00 302287 5401 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 416.00 366071 11129/2012 102727 FORCE AMERICA 321.65 AUGER MOTOR 00005731 302546 01395074 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 636.89 AUGER MOTORS 00005731 302547 01395073 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 958.54 366072 11129/2012 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 284.00 REIMBURSE CRAFT SUPPLIES 302548 111912 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 284.00 366073 1112912012 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 169.00 VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS 302382 84365 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 169.00 366074 11129/2012 104877 GENERAL SPRINKLER CORP. 920.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 00006081 302549 14984 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 920.00 366075 11/2912012 119936 GLOBAL OAK 37.50 ART CENTER &COMMERCE 302383 010931 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 543.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 302383 010931 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 693.75 ARENA&COMMERCE 302383 010931 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 750.00 ARENA E- COMMERCE 302383 010931 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,025.00 366076 .1112912012 124471 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC. 2,150.00 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY 302550 130129736 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,150.00 366077 1112912012 103855 GRAHN, LEON 380.73 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 302615 112612 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 380.73 366076 11129/2012 101103 GRAINGER 121.15 EAR PLUGS 00003107 302384 9976405010 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28120127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 9 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 111.15 BROOMS 00005747 302385 9976616962 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355.74 SCREWDRIVERS, HAMMERS 00005744 302386 9977747741 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 29.60 FLASHLIGHTS 00005744 302387 9977287789 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 155.05 WRENCHES 00005744 302388 9977287771 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8.64 ELECTRICAL TAPE 00005750 302389 9978480342 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 164.21 RATCHET, SOCKET 00001397 302390 9978125541 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 25.10 CORNER GUARD 00001343 302616 9958023773 5641.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 25.10- CREDIT 302617 9972963509 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 31.03 CORNER GUARD 00001343 302618 9958107394 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 183.24 CORNER GUARDS 00001375 302619 9968228040 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 1,159.81 366079 1112912012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 115.00 302268 00029282 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 115.00 366080 11129/2012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 836.50 302446 146285 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 551.25 302447 146358 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,387.75 366081 1112912012 101738 GTS EDUCATIONAL EVENTS 820.00 MN GOVERNMENT IT SYMPOSIUM 302551 1041027 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 820.00 366082 1112912012 102210 RAGE CONCRETE WORKS 1,215.00 6116 CRESCENT DR DRIVEWAY 302552 00001672 01385.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD 1,215.00 366083 1112912012 101255 HASLER INC. 318.61 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 302391 16346125 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 318.61 366084 1112912012 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 1,471.37 LIDS, HYD MARKERS 00001400 302392 5765087 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,471.37 366085 1112912012 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 11,139.90 DEC 2012 302393 41857717 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,299.83 302394 41856218 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 12,439.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 10 11127/2012 - 11/2912012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 366086 1112912012 115599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFF 381.51 DWI FORFEITURE 302395 112012 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 381.51 366087 1112912012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,068.60 RADIO ADMIN FEE 302553 121038014 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,068.60 366088 1112912012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,283.45 302448 625038 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 135.00 302449 625062 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 258.00 302450 625137 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 763.50 302639 625138 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 2,439.95 366089 11/2912012 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 240.00 OFFICIATING FEES 302396 274 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 240.00 366090 11/2912012 131150 JEREMIASON, SARAH 118.16 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 302554 ACCT#307036007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 118.16 366091 1112912012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 57.55 302289 1937371 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,823.05 302290 1937370 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 6,030.95 302291 1937372 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 36.50 302451 1967019 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 83.40 302452 1967016 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,990.30 302453 1967015 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,052.13 302640 1967018 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 14,073.88 366093 11/2912012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,567.81 302292 1435219 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 996.05 302293 1435215 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 493.92 302294 1435217 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,871.77 302295 1435231 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,765.71 302296 1435233 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,586.81 302297 1435230 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 141.45 302298 1435710 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.00 302299 1435708 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 1 Council Check Register Page - 11 11/27/2012 - 11/2912012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 475.00 302300 1435709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 744.32 302454 1439354 5842.5512 COST 0F'GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,894.10 302455 1439352 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,010.85 302456 1439350 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD,LI000R YORK SELLING . 614.96 302457 1435707 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,204.34 302458 1437490 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,249.32 302459 1437491 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,206.17 302460 1437495 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 997.92 302461 1437494 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,062.60 302462 1437492 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _ VERNON SELLING 2,110.83 302463 1437493 5862.5513 _ COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 45.22- 302464 553376 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.90- 302465 553036 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 70.12- 302466 551747 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - VERNON SELLING 30.28- 302467 551748 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . VERNON SELLING 33.09- 302468 554233 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.03- 302469 554232 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.28- 302470 554231 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 46.87- 302471 554230 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .09- 302472 549555 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108.59 302641 1439338 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 965.27 302642 1439339 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 172.24 302643 1439340 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 194.89 302644 1439343 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,158.42 302645 1439353 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,368.41 302646 1439351 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 880.67 302647 1439349 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15.88- 302648 554227 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.70- 302649 554286 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.12- 302650 552487 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 40,608.84 ' 366094 11/29/2012 111018 KEEPRS INC. 332.33, UNIFORMS 00003843 302555 195782 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 332.33 366095 1112912012 _ 104979 :KOCON, ED 248.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT _ 302620 112612 5410.6107 ' MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 248.64 366096 11129/2012 101332 KOJETIN, ROBERT 67.63 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES, 302556 111912 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11127/2012 — 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 67.63 366097 11/2912012 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 180.56 DWI TOW 302397 112012 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONCESSION EQUIP ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS SENIOR TRIPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 11128/20127:47:50 Page - 12 Business Unit DWI FORFEITURE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING FIRSTAID SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 180.56 366098 1112912012 131159 LAKE STATE CONCRETE LLC 1,795.00 CONCESSION STAND WALL 302621 ICEARENA 5500.1785 1,795.00 366099 11129/2012 131145 LANDVIK, LORNA 258.35 ART WORK SOLD 302557 111912 5101.4413 - 258.35 366100 11/2912012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 674.08 SCREWS, WASHERS, FITTINGS 00005723 302398 9301244700 1553.6530 674.08 366101 11129/2012 104144 LEW, DOUG 116.00 TRIP REFUND (2) 302558 112112 1628.4392.07 116.00 366102 11129/2012 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 151.51 COPIER USAGE 302399 1485192 1553.6406 151.51 366103 1112912012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,151.54 302301 142408 5862.5515 1,151.54 366104 1112912012 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 416.00 OXYGEN 00003649 302559 05821344 - 1470.6510 416.00 366105 11129/2012 130990 MAY, PAM 41.52 SUPPLIES 302622 112312 5511.6406 160.00 SYCROINSTRUCTOR 302622 112312 5511.6103 201.52 366106 11/29/2012 101483 MENARDS 113.65 TAPE, LUMBER 00001251 302400 5525 5913.6406 2.66 CATCH BASIN PLUG 00001380 302401 9641 1322.6406 CONCESSION EQUIP ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS SENIOR TRIPS GENERAL SUPPLIES 11128/20127:47:50 Page - 12 Business Unit DWI FORFEITURE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING FIRSTAID SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 13 11/27/2012 — 11129/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit ' 116.31 366107 _ 1112912012 100885 METRO SALES INC 3,841.00 COPIER,USAGE 302402 481746 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 347.34. RENTAL COPIER 302403 36230A 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 143.21 COPIER USAGE 302560 485986 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 4,331.55 366108 1112912012 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 142.50 .. OFFICIATING FEES - 302404 4205 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 142.50 366109 - 1112912012 130914 MICKELSON, -DAVID 66.00 REIMBURSE FOR LICENSE 302561 111912 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 66.00 _ 366110 1112912012 104650 .MICROCENTER 58.74 DVDS 00003111 302562. 4173407 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.74 366111 1112912012 110506 MID AMERICA METER INC. 2,473.80 LARGE METER SURVEY 00001406 302405 012 -2369 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 2,473.80 366112 11129/2012 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 489.75 TOWELS, +SOAP, NAPKINS 00003515 302563 33603 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 489.75 366113 1112912012 118464 MIDWESTTESTING 25.00 METER TEST 00001546 302406 2644 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 245.00 METER TEST 00001546 302407 2652 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR ' 270.00 366114 1112912012 101225 MILLERBERND 4,125.38 SHAFTASSEMBLIES 00001848 302408 098460 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 4,125.38 366115 1112912012 127062 MINNEHAHABLDG. MAINT, INC. 5.34 WINDOW WASHING 302564 928004332 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5.34 - 366116 1112912012 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 14 11/27/2012 - 11129/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22,105.00 CONNECTION FEE 302409 10-12 TO 12/12 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,105.00 366117 1112912012 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,815.93 HYDRANT FITTINGS 00001409 302410 0293243 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,815.93 366118 11/2912012 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 75.00 REI PERMIT 302565 7501 IKOLA WAY 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 75.00 366119 11129/2012 121257 NATIONAL CREATIVE ENTERPRISES 19.81 SALES TAX DUE 302411 13050.2 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.81 366120 11129/2012 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 324.50 302473 77391 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 324.50 366121 1112912012 116697 NORBLOM PLUMBING 20.08 PERMIT REFUND 302567 ED118366 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 20.08 366122 11129/2012 100180 NORTH HENNEPIN COMMUNITY COLLE 1,452.72 CLASS REGISTRATION 302568 11695296 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,452.72 366123 1112912012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 103.39 PAINT 00009217 302569 43274000 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 41.97 PAINT 00009211 302570 43192302 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 145.36 366124 1112912012 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 23.80 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.80 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 23.80 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 47.60 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 47.60 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.60 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 71.40 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 71.40 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 71.40 OCT 2012 302624 W12100658 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation COST 92.10 OCT 2012 SOLD WINE 95.20 OCT 2012 - 11/29/2012 117.95 OCT 2012 Inv No 119.00 OCT 2012 302624 168.01 OCT 2012 TELEPHONE 168.02 OCT 2012 5821.6188 238.00 OCT 2012 W12100658 370.80 TELEPHONE 302624 1,797.48 1646.6188 366125 1112912012 302624 120855 OLSON, VICKI 5710.6188 7.77 MEETING EXPENSES W12100658 45.00 MEETING EXPENSES 302624 52.77 1622.6188 366126 1112912012 302625 130294 O- MALLEY, KELLY 5420.6188 405.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIR - 5100 WINDSOF 302475 965.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIR - 5103WINDSOR COST 1,370.00 GOODS 366127 1112912012 VERNON SELLING 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 8373729 -CM 600.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND OF 600.00 - 366128 1112912012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,193.58 460.50 165.81 33.25 121.25- 1,105.54 1 250.74 366129 11/2912012 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 1,275.00 IT CONSULTING 1,275.00 366130 1112912012 100949 PDI NINTH HOUSE 8,250.00 FIRE MARSHALL ASSESSMENTS 8,250.00 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 15 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE SKATING & HOCKEY CLUB HOUSE 302412 111712 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 302412 111712 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 302623 351013 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 302623 351013 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 302413 111612 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 302302 CITY OF EDINA COST OF Council Check Register SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11/2712012 - 11/29/2012 5862.5513 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302624 W12100658 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 302624 W12100658 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 302624 W12100658 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 302624 W12100658 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 302624 W12100658 5710.6188 TELEPHONE 302624 W12100658 5760.6188 TELEPHONE 302624 W12100658 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 302625 W12100664 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 15 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE SKATING & HOCKEY CLUB HOUSE 302412 111712 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 302412 111712 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 302623 351013 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 302623 351013 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 302413 111612 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 302302 8376262 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 302303 8375832 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 302304 8375531 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 302305 8375539 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 302306 8375952 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 302474 8376260 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 302475 8376265 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 302651 8373729 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 302571 111712009 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 302572 1101310056 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 16 Business Unit VERNON SELLING GRILL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11/27/2012 - 11129/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 366131 1112912012 VERNON SELLING 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 298.60 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 302476 07067297 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 267.63 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 302573 07787693 5421.5510 566.23 366132 1112912012 125978 PETSMART#459 112.38 K9 SUPPLIES 00003106 302414 T-1458 4607.6406 112.38 366134 1112912012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 91.88 302307 2334180 5862.5515 1,239.41 302308 2333891 5822.5513 468.48 302309 2333895 5822.5513 2,440.48 302310 2335341 5862.5513 147.36 302311 2335338 5862.5513 1,285.88 302312 2335339 5862.5513 3,095.37 302313 2333901 5862.5513 114.24 302314 2333893 5662.5513 1,050.30 302315 2333899 5862.5513 1,439.09 302477 2335340 5862.5512 337.16 3D2478 2336665 5842.5512 36.00- 302479 3492038 5862.5513 6.06- 302480 3493951 5862.5513 8.92- 302481 3493952 5862.5513 16.76- 302482 3493953 5862.5513 27.58- 302483 3494092 5862.5513 185.76 302652 2336658 5822.5512 316.48 302653 2336659 5822.5513 2,986.57 302654 2336664 5842.5513 1.12 302655 2336663 5842.5512 2,155.67 302656 2336666 5842.5513 212.48 302657 2336657 5842.5513 17,472.51 366135 11129/2012 129727 PRIOR LAKE WINDJAMMERS 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1214112 302340 112012 5710.6136 150.00 366136 11129/2012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 2,565.00 FLOOR SCRUBBER 302415 5826 5761.6406 2,565.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 16 Business Unit VERNON SELLING GRILL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Council Check Register 11/27/2012 — 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount -. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 366137 - 1112912012 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.60 '-EP ENTERTAINMENT.12/2/12 302339 112012 5710.6136 100.00 366138 1112912012 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 1,372.50 DASHERBOARDAD SALES 302416 1012151 -8 5510.6103 440.00 DASHERBOARD AD.SALES 302417 1112151 -8 5510.6103 1,812.50 '366139 1112912012 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 363,602.91 HORNETS NEST CONSTRUCTION 302418 1207021803 5500.1705 363,602.91 366140 1112912012 129348 SAFETY.ON SITE LLC 1,797.00 HARNESSES, LANYARDS 302574 111412 1301.6610 '1,797.00 366141 1112912012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 15.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE' 302626 999999 -10/26 5710.6103 15.00 3661.42 1112912012 118168 ,SANSIO ''50.00 EMS FAXING 302575 INV -08810 -2012 1470:6160 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 302576 INV 09060 -2012 1470.6160 783.00 366143 1112912012 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 767.25 QUARTERLY BILLING 302627 8103324608 1628.6103 767.25' ,366144, 1112912012 100991 SCHWAB- VOLLHABER - LUBRATT 7,084.45 HEAT PUMP REPAIR/PARTS .302577 120831 -008 1552.6406 7,084.45 -366146 1112912012 104689 • SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 158.07 NAME PLATES 302419^ 43137 1180.6103 158.07 366146 1112912012 103219 SGN WENDEL 3;312.00 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 302420 3611 47078.6710 3,312.00 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH R55CKREG LOG20000 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11127/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 366147 1112912012 131147 SHERMAN, AUDREY 61.00 SR. TRIP REFUND 302578 111912 1628.4392.0 61.00 366148 11129/2012 120784 SIGN PRO 197.72 DASHER BOARD AD 302628 6156 5511.6406 197.72 DASHER BOARD AD 302629 6162 5511.6406 197.72 DASHER BOARD AD 302630 6170 5511.6406 197.72 DASHER BOARD AD 302631 6185 5511.6406 790.88 366149 11/2912012 127737 SONOSITE 18,809.50 ULTRASOUND SYSTEM 00003511 302579 1238722 421470.6710 18,809.50 366150 11/2912012 131148 SORTEBERG, KEN 300.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 302580 ACCT #153819017 5900.2015 300.00 366151 1112912012 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTER 336.66 CARPET CLEANING 302421 950 5861.6162 224.44 302422 951 5821.6162 561.10 366152 11129/2012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 262.72 302316 1964804 5862.5513 225.00 302317 1964805 5842.5513 1,652.00 302318 1920353 58215513 1,184.35 302464 1967454 5862.5512 906.00 302485 1940729 5862.5513 4,536.82 302486 1982224 5862.5513 1,178.00 302487 1982225 5822.5513 5,262.31 302488 1967471 5842.5512 1,978.44 302489 1967464 5842.5512 108.50 302490 1940745 5842.5513 6,133.16 302491 1982228 5842.5513 863.60 302658 1967459 5822.5512 24,290.90 366153 1112912012 130640 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS IN 7,050.05 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 302425 29877 5500.1705 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT CUSTOMER REFUND SERVICES CUSTODIANS SERVICES CUSTODIANS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 75.00 CITY OF EDINA 302338 111612 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL'SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH'ADMIN18TRATION Council Check Register 75.00 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # - Date - Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO #` Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 7,050.05 1,319.90 TRAINING AMMO 00003102 302426 566154'; 1112912012 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS - 122455. SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 1,319.90 2,188.80 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001405 302423 1235 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES 366158 1112912012 2,188.80 366155 11129/2012 101004 SPS COMPANIES REMOVE DECALS 00005753 302581 620057 1553.6180 28.97 PVC PIPE, COUPLING 00001399 302424 S2640775.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.97 366156 1112912012 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 103658 ST LOUIS PARK'COMMUNITY BAND 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 19 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 11118/12 302338 111612 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL'SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH'ADMIN18TRATION 75.00 366157 1112912012 101015 STREICHERS 1,319.90 TRAINING AMMO 00003102 302426 1970737 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS - POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,319.90 366158 1112912012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 125.00 - REMOVE DECALS 00005753 302581 620057 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.00 366159 1112912012 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 537.33 TIRES 00005735 302582 10113739 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 537.33 366160 11/29/2012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS - 65.95 PUBLISH NOTICE 302583 1404760 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 29.98 PUBLIC ACCURACY TEST 302584 1404759 1120.6120 ADVERTISING' LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 44.96 ST PATS LIQUOR LICENSE 302585 1406042 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL : - ADMINISTRATION 215.82 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -15 302586 1406043 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 173.86 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -16 302587 1406044 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 98.92 PUBLISH ORD 2012 =18 302588 " 1406045 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 71.92 PUBLISH SAMPLE BALLOT 302589 1407393 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 152.83 EDINAELECTION 302590 1407392 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 224.75 BRAEMAR AD FOR BID 302591 1407394 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 59.95 PUBLISH NOTICE 302592 1407395 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 35.97 PUBLISH NOTICE 302593 1408700 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 56.95 - AD FOR BID - PAVER 302594 1408701 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 56.95 PUBLISH NOTICE 302595 1409819 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1,288.81 R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL Council Check Register 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 366161 11/2912012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 955.00 302319 007588 5822.5514 1,534.00 302492 007681 5862.5514 1,910.00 302659 007726 5842.5514 4,399.00 366162 11/2912012 130367 TASC 223.00 COBRAADMIN 302632 IN138939 1550.6103 223.00 366163 1112912012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,895.40 302320 722890 5862.5514 172.30 302321 722891 5862.5515 114.00 302493 723734 5862.5514 1,177.95 302494 723735 5862.5514 201.00 302596 00774573 5421.5514 4,560.65 366164 11/2912012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 293.75 COUNCIL MINUTES 10/2/12 302427 M19369 1120.6103 325.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 10/16112 302428 M19405 1120.6103 168.75 COUNCIL MINUTES 11105/12 302429 M19437 1120.6103 787.50 366165 1112912012 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 2,912.82 2012 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 302597 002012003254 1260.6103 2,912.82 366166 11129/2012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 73.91 NOZZLES 00005724 302430 116253 1553.6580 73.91 366167 11129/2012 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 287.50 HARNESSES 00001358 302431 56938 1330.6215 287.50 366168 1112912012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 413.07 MULCHING MOWER BLADES 302432 SI32399 1641.6530 413.07 366169 11/2912012 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 64,182.66 TASERS 00003085 302433 141353 421400.6710 11/28/20127:47:50 Page - 20 Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRAFFIC SIGNALS MOWING POLICE EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28120127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 21 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 64,182.66 366170 11129/2012 119476 USPCA REGION 12 135.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 302598 112112 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 135.00 366171 1112912012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 20.52 PLATES, UTENSILS 302434 254659 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 759.50 LIQUOR BAGS 302434 254659 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 780.02 366172 1112912012 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 92.88 302633 2826900628 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 32.97 302634 2827562044 5952.6188 TELEPHONE RECYCLING 32.97 302634 2827562044 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 40.01 302634 2827562044 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 40.01 302634 2827562044 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 41.75 302634 2827562044 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 288.58 302634 2827562044 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 569.17 366173 1112912012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 522.47 CONDUIT, KITS 00001383 302435 6859425 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS 522.47 366174 11129/2012 131160 VOIGT & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 302635 8 -2873 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,000.00 366175 1112912012 129142 WALLY S SERVICE STATION INC. 46.88 NON - OXYGEN GASOLINE 00003576 302599 110912 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.88 366176 1112912012 101501 WENZEL HEATING & AIR COND 323.46 PERMIT REFUND 302600 ED118139 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 323.46 366177 1112912012 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 758.09 BACKGROUND CHECKS 362436 825985899 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 758.09 366178 11129/2012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page - 22 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,479.47 302495 315487 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,016.85 302496 315485 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 388.40 302497 315486 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,884.72 366179 1112912012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,071.86 302322 429988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 180.00 302323 431197 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 100.00 302324 4312D9 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,284.97 302325 432393 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 704.08 302326 432392 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,302.40 302327 432030 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 302328 432033 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,997.36 302329 431963 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,127.48 302330 431960 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 651.20 302331 432031 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.00 302498 431202 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 200.00 302499 431196 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.00 302500 431199 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12- 302501 59565 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 194.99- 302502 59566 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,197.17 302660 432726 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 313.16 302661 432723 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17,094.69 366180 11129/2012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 31.02 302332 135296 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,489.06 302333 137104 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,115.80 302334 135299 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 122.20 302503 138640 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,114.17 302504 138638 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,429.81 302505 138639 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 806.75 302506 137718 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,518.53 302507 137717 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,388.66 302508 137715 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ VERNON SELLING 190.36 302509 137716 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 56.00- 302510 871850 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,259.92 302662 138636 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 407.73 302663 138637 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 246.03- 302664 871633 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21,571.98 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/28/20127:47:50 Council Check Register Page- 23 11127/2012 — 11/2912012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit '366181 1112912012 124529. WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,758.65 302335 963997 5822.5514 COST OP GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 153.10 302336 984291 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,575.55 302337 984290 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,750.30 302511 985061 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. VERNON SELLING 2,002.65 302512 985062 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.00 302513 985063 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1211.00 302514 985064 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12,403.25 366182 11129.12012 121682 WMCA 160.00 IIMC_MEETING/DIALOGUE 302601 112612 1180.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ELECTION 160.00 366183 1112912012 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 907.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 302602 25 05516.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION W 44TH ST RECON 1,370.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 302603 38 1260.6103 PROF_ ESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,277.50 366184 11/2912012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 7,790.41 51- 6644819 -9 302636 347959457 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 7,790.41 366185 1112912012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 3,427.10 DIESEL FUEL 00005975 302437 514280 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,544.65 UNLEADED GAS 00005975 302438 514281 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 12,690.00 DIESEL FUEL 302604 516207 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19,594.60 UNLEADED FUEL 00005975 302605 516871 . 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,703.40 DIESEL FUEL 00005975 302606 521063 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. 5,874.15 UNLEADED FUEL 302607 521064 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,850.89 GENERATOR FUEL 00001413 302637 11147 -11152 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 55;684.99 1,1061392:37 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals . - - Check Total 1,106,392.37 Total Payments 1,106,392.37 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EUINA 11/28��_ ,17:49:14 Councll Check Summary Page - 1 11/27/2012 - 11/29/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERALFUND 170,102.03 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 562.07 04000 .WORKING CAPITAL FUND 34,041.54 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 83,036.66 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,288.06 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 92.10 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 23.80 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 3,425.78 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 377,132.23 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,498.42 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 6,245.37 05800 LIQUOR FUND 161,383.50 05900 UTILITY FUND 239,527.84 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.97 Report Totals 1,106,392.37 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies nd procedures 10 [ o I- w91�,r'� O e CORPORI*� lees To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. C. The Recommended Bid is From: Wayne D. Houle P.E. ® Within Budget Director of Engineering ❑ NotWithin Budget .. Date: December 4, 2012 Subject: Soil: Remediation at Braemar Public Works Area, Improvement No. A -243 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: October 31, 2012 December 31, 2012 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: 1. Belair Sitework Services $79,702.00 2. "Carl Bolander & Sons Co. $80,300.00 3. Veit & Company, Inc. $88,235.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Belair Sitework Services $79,702.00 General Information: This project will remove contaminated soil.that was deposited with the soil remediation project in 1998. The soil is contaminated with low levels of lead and was left onsite to save money at the original time.of cleanup. The soil removal will allow for additional outside work area for the Public Works and Park Maintenance Staff, the area is approximately. 100' by 140'. This area will be used for recycling roadway materials that are generated from typical work activities such as watermain breaks or park improvement projects. Tests performed on the adjacent pond do not indicate any contamination of the pond water. This project will be completed in December. The 2012 -2016 CIP allocated $200,000 for this project. GAI'MCENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \A243 Braemar Sports Dome & Lead Abatement \DESIGN \Soil Re medlation \Item IV C Soil Remediation at Braemar Public Works Area, Improvement No. A- 243.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 P To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda. Item #: IV. D. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date:. December 4, 2012 Information ,0 Subjects Resolution No. 2012 -164 Approving Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base Conditional Use License Agreement Action Requested: Adopt:resolution No. 2012 -164 approving Hennepin County Electronic Data Base Conditional'Use License Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to sign attached agreement. Information / Background: The Conditional Use License Agreement is the standard document Hennepin County asks governmental entities to sign when the County provides the entity with an electronic geographical digitized database (computerized mapping information) of the City. The Agreement is to protect the County's proprietary interest and removes the restriction on the City's use and /or distribution of hardcopies made from the County data. This renewal is for the extension of the 2000 EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement to December 31, 2013. Attachments: Resolution No. 2012 -164 Hennepin County EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement No. A00279 . G: \PW \ADMIN \COMM \INTERNAL \CORR -'ENG \HC EPDB Agreements \2013 \Item IV. . Resolution No. 2012- Approving Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base Conditional Use License Agreement.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -164 RESOLUTION APPROVING HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY DATA BASE (EPDB) . � CONDITIONAL USE LICENSE AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. ', Recitals. Hennepin County (the "County ") has developed an Electronic Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) (the "Data Base "), which the City desires to utilize. There has been prepared and presented to' the City a Conditional Use License Agreement (the "Agreement ") between the City and County, pursuant to which the County grants the City a limited license to use the.Data Base as provided in-the Agreement. Section 2. Approvals: The form of the Agreement is hereby approved, and the City Manager is authorized' to enter into the Agreement on- behalf, of the City in substantially the form presented. to the City with such: changes or modifications thereto as do not change the substance of the Agreement and are approved` by the City Manager, such approval to be conclusively presumed by the execution and delivery of the Agreement by the City Manager. . Dated: December 4, 2012 ... Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. . WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov • 952426 -0371 a Fax 952- 826 -0392 ; v Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department Survey Division - Suite A -703 612.348.3131 Phone Hennepin County Government Center 612.348.2837 Fax Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 www.co.hennepin.mn.us November 8, 2012 Wayne D. Houle City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Agreement # A00279 Hennepin County desires to extend the above referenced EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31, 2013. If you as a Government Unit, Consultant/Third Party or Private Corporation, desire to extend the above- reference Agreement, the following requirements must be satisfied as they pertain to your entity. Please return the required information to Hennepin County, Attention: Robert Moulder (at the address stated at the top of this page). A.) GOVERNMENTAL UNIT MUST FURNISH TO THE COUNTY A COPY OF. THE ACTION OF USER'S GOVERNING BODY AUTHORIZING THIS AGREEMENT EXTENSION. HOWEVER, IF AN OFFICIAL OF USER IS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR CHARTER TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT OF THIS NATURE THEN THIS ORIGINAL LETTER SIGNED BY SUCH OFFICIAL AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION MUST BE RETURNED TO THE COUNTY. NOTE: SUCH OFFICIAL MUSTATTACH70 THIS LETTER A COPY OF THEIR STATUTORY OR CHARTER A UTHORITY TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENTS. B.) CONSULTANT /THIRD PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE COUNTY A COPY OF AFFIRMATION BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT THAT YOU WILL CONTINUE AS CONSULTANT AS STATED IN AGREEMENT NO. THROUGH THE YEAR 2013. IN ADDITION, . CONSULTANT /THIRD PARTY MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. C.) PRIVATE CORPORATION MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. As authbrized;by, the.-AgreementaM nbting.the. above idqLiiiiihdhts, which pjertziri wyptk specificaJ1y, please indicate below your ifitenfi6n to dztirid 6i• riot to extend this' agreement, through the' year 2O I . please: return the 6riginals of this Og&-ihd ihi ac)mo*16dge"m"6n't pagi.3- and`a copy of affirmation as CorLsu ltanVnird Party, ais r6q . uir , ed: to the attention of Robcit Moulder at the ad&d§9 shown M the top of page I as soon as possible; Please eheok (X). appropriate ate boxi It is our in-1eirt . i t0i'vOeqd this agreement through the year 2013. It is NOT our inObtl6n towerid.this iigreement through the year 2013. We n0, I—onger:req"iiir'e-.this.inf6r.m4tipn. . Sig h0ure: Date-.- Atithorized Signature Title: If you have any.qu*tibns hb6iUtlhis notice, please call Robert Moulder at 612 - 348 -2618 for assistance. Sincerely, Richard P. Johnson County Adrainistrator To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL o1�e Agenda Item #: IV. E. From: Robert C. Wilson, CAE, ASA, City Assessor Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2012 — 165 Approvng Senior Citizen Special Assessment Deferrals Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2012 -165 authorizing special assessment deferral for 4011 W 44" St and 5607 Sherwood Ave. Information / Background: State Statutes and City policy allow the deferment of special assessments for property owners who meet the required eligibility standards and complete an application. An application for deferment has been received and a resolution has been prepared. A copy of this resolution is attached for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution 2012 -165 G:\PW\CENTRALSVCS\ENGDIV\PROJECTS\CONTRACTS\2012\ENG 12 -4 Richmond Hills \SS471 \Private Sewer Repairs \Item IV.H. Approve Special Assessment Agreements - Richmond Hills Park.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -165 APPROVING DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Page 2 WHEREAS, certain applications and authorization for deferral of special assessments have been received by the City of Edina from citizens seeking to have the special assessments for their properties deferred as allowed by provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following applications are hereby granted the requested deferral of special assessments: PID PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS LEVY NO. 07- 028 -24-44 -0001 Lloyd R. Flynn 4011 W 44th St 18286 19- 028 -24-23 -0010 Richard J. Russell 5607 Sherwood Ave 18280 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2012 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of ,20 . Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: John Wallin, Finance Director Date: December 4, 2012 Subject: Selection MMKR As City Auditor C, e ry • fNroRPOPXT • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. F. Action Discussion O Information 0 Action Requested: To select Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR) as the City's Auditor for a three year term and to authorize staff to sign the Auditor Engagement Letter when delivered by the auditor and as prescribed by auditing standards. Information / Background: The Finance Department sent out request for proposals (RFP) for professional auditing services and received 7 replies. A pre - proposal meeting was held on October 31 to answer any questions about the RFP. One firm at the pre - proposal meeting did not respond with a proposal, otherwise all firms present at the pre - proposal meeting submitted a proposal. An Auditor Selection Committee consisting of Eric Roggeman, Bill Neuendorf, Wayne Houle, and myself was formed to review and make recommendations. Bill Neuendorf and Wayne Houle were chosen because of their experience at reviewing proposals and to give the process a review from outside the Finance Department. The first criteria of the RFP is to determine the expertise of the audit firm and the staff that would be assigned to the City's audit. The RFP requests information on the firm's qualification and experience and a listing of similar engagements that the firm has. With the number, frequency and complexity of new governmental accounting standards and with the complexity of the City of Edina's financial statements including Liquor Stores, Golf Courses, Art Center, special assessments and others, the City requires a firm to have the expertise that comes with dealing with other cities the size and complexity of the City of Edina. Of the 7 proposals received, three of the firms handled substantially all of the cities that the City of Edina compares itself to including Brooklyn Center, Burnsville, Plymouth, Golden Valley, Bloomington, Chanhassen, St. Louis Park, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Roseville, and Woodbury. Further research was done to compare the firm's similar clients and their enterprises and other special needs to that of Edina and that research again pointed to the same three firms with MMKR in front, followed by HLB Tautges Redpath Ltd. and KDV. The Audit Selection Committee selected these three for further consideration and Finance staff called references from the three finalists and representatives from each of the three firms were also interviewed by the Auditor Selection Committee. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The current audit firm of MMKR has the highest number of clients having the same complexities as the City of Edina and the lowest audit fee of the three finalists. The Auditor Selection Committee would recommend again utilizing MMKR to perform the Audit for the City of Edina. The 2011 audit cost $38,000. The proposal from MMKR for the 2012 audit to be completed in 2013 will be $33,400 amounting to a reduction in audit fees of $4,600. Below is the list of the 7 proposals received for Audit services and the dollar amount of the proposal for the three years requested in the RFP: Smith, Schafer & Associates, Ltd $97,835 MMKR $101,400 Clifton LarsonAl len LLP $103,275 HLB Tautges Redpath Ltd. $108,000 KDV $109,975 Abdo, Eick & Meyers LLP $110,424 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP $1 1 1,500 Attachments City of Edina's Request for Proposals CITY OF EDINA O, 1888 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 0 PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES: City of Edina South Metro Public Safety Training Facility October 18, 2012 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services 1. Introduction a) General Information The City of Edina (City) is requesting proposals from qualified firms of Certified Public Accountants to audit its financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 with the option, upon mutual agreement, of auditing the financial statements for each of the two subsequent fiscal years. The audit of the City is to be performed in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Govemment Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the MN State Legal Compliance audit requirements, as well as all other Federal, State and local requirements in effect now or placed in effect during the engagement. In addition, the audit must comply with the provisions of the federal Single Audit Act of 1996 and U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A -133, Audits of State and Local Governments, if such an audit is required. There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City to reimburse responding firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request. To be considered, three copies of the proposal must be received by John Wallin, Finance Director by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, November 9, 2012. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted. The City reserves the right, where it may serve the City's best interest, to request additional information or clarifications from proposers, or to allow corrections of errors or omissions. At the discretion of the City, firms submitting proposals may be requested to make oral presentations as part of the evaluation process. The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and to use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposals (RFP), unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted. b) Term of Engagement A three -year contract with the City is contemplated, subject to an annual review by the City. Based on satisfactory performance, the City may extend the agreement annually without solicitations from other firms. In the event of unsatisfactory performance, or when in the best interest of the City, proposals may be solicited before the end of the three year period. City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services The agreement between the City and the auditing firm shall be the request for proposals and it will include any issues addressed in the RFP. c) Subcontracting No subcontracting will .be allowed Witte, express prior written consent of the City. 2. NATURE OF SERVICES REQUIRED a) Scope of Work to be Performed The City desires the auditor to express an opinion on the fair presentation of its basic financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. For the City of Edina, the auditor is required to audit the basic financial statements, Required Supplementary Information, combining and individual.fund statements. The auditor is not required to audit the statistical section of the report. b) Auditing Standards to be Followed To meet the requirements of this RFP, the audit for the City of Edina shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards set forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the standards for financial audits set forth in the U.S. General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards, the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1996 and the provisions of U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of State and Local Governments. c) Reports to be Issued i) City of Edina Following the completion of the audit of the fiscal year's: financial statements, the auditor shall: (1) Issue an. opinion letter on the City's basic financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 2 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services (2) Issue a report on the consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting. (3) Issue a report on the City's compliance with applicable laws and regulations. (4) Communicate in a letter to management any reportable conditions found during the audit. (5) Special Considerations (6) If a single audit is needed, the schedule of federal financial assistance and related auditor's report, as well as the reports on the internal controls and compliance will not be included in the CAFR. These reports will be the responsibility of the auditor. ii) South Metro Public Safety Training Facility (SMPSTF) Following the completion of the audit of the fiscal year's financial statements, the auditor shall: (7) Issue an opinion letter on the basic financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. (8) Issue a report on the consideration of the internal control over financial reporting. (9) Issue a report on compliance with applicable laws and regulations. (10) Communicate in a letter to management any reportable conditions found during the audit. (11) Special Considerations (12) If a single audit is needed, the schedule of federal financial assistance and related auditor's report, as well as the reports on the internal controls and compliance. These reports will be the responsibility of the auditor. 3 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services d) Working Paper Retention and Access to Working Papers All working papers and reports must be retained, at the auditor's expense, for a minimum of three (3) years, unless the firm is notified in writing by the City of the need to. extend.the retention period. The auditor will be required to make working papers available,. upon request, to the City or its designees. In addition, the :firm shall respond to the reasonable inquiries of successor . auditors _'and allow successor auditors to review working. papers relating to matters of continuing accounting significance. 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF EDINA a) Background The City, incorporated in 1888,. is a fully developed first -ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 48,262. Currently, 98% of the City is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways and 11.8% supporting the park and open spaces. The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial and public /semi - public uses. The City is empowered to .levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries. The City has operated under the Council- Manager form of government since 1955. Policy- making and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor, and four other members, all elected on a non - partisanbasis. Council members serve four -year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor also serves a four -year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large: The`City,provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and. maintenance of.,highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational and cultural, activities and events. Please refer to the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a complete description of the. governments and their financial operations. The financial statements, budget, and capital improvement plan can be found on the City's website, edinamn.gov. On the home page, click on "City offices" then "Finance ". 4 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services b) Federal Financial Assistance A single audit in accordance with the provisions of US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A -133 was not required for 2011. At the time of this RFP, the City believes it is unlikely, but possible, a single audit will be required for the 2012 fiscal year. Proposals should include costs for these services as a separate item from the other services that are to be provided. We also ask that you provide an estimate on what these services would cost in future years in the event a single audit is required for 2013 and /or 2014. c) Finance Department The Finance Department of the City of Edina is headed by John Wallin, Finance Director and Treasurer and consists of 7 full -time employees and 1 part-time employee. The principal functions performed and the number of employees assigned to each are as follows: Function Number of Employees Finance Director 1 Assistant Finance Director 1 Accountant 1 Accounting Associate 1 Accounts Payable 1 Utility Billing 1 FT, 1 PT Payroll Associate 1 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY ASSOCIATION (SMPSTF) a) Background SMPSTF is a joint powers organization, financed by owner contributions. The owners of SMPSTF have determined that it is in the best interest of their communities to undertake, in a cooperative fashion, the construction of a facility to be used for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. SMPSTF was established in accordance with Minnesota Statutes that authorize governmental units to join together to provide services or perform duties that they could not do themselves. SMPSTF is considered a governmental unit, but is not a component unit of any of its owners. As a governmental unit, SMPSTF is exempt from federal and state income taxes. City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services SMPSTF is governed by a board consisting of one representative from each owner governmental unit. The owners of SMPSTF include : the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, and the Metropolitan Airports Commission. In addition to owner contributions, SMPSTF is supported by providing training and renting the facility, when. available, to other governments and groups. SMPSTF also opens its shooting range to the general public :for. a fee during designated hours. The City of Edina Finance Department acts as the fiscal agent for the SMPSTF and :provides all treasury, accounting, payroll as well . as other services. Most business processes between the two entities are similar or identical. For this reason, the two entities have historically had the same auditor, although the two governing bodies reserve the right to act independently. b) Separate fees The SMPSTF is a legal entity separate from the City of Edina and may choose to have a different auditor. Proposals should include a cost for these services as a separate item from the other services that are to be provided. The City and the SMPSTF may choose different auditors based on the fees, qualifications, or other factors as they deem appropriate. c) SMPSTF Scope SMPSTF has one full -time employee who coordinates all activities and several part-time staff that perform basic facility maintenance and after -hours staffing. The annual budget is less than $1 million dollars, and they have approximately $250,000 in cash and investments at a given .time, which is the biggest asset other than. the. capital assets. There is no bonded debt outstanding. Additional . information can be obtained. on the website: htfp:// www. southmetrotraining .com /index.htmi.. Additional information on the finances or electronic copies of past audits can be obtained from Assistant Finance Director Eric Roggeman ' at (952) 826 -04.14 or eroggeman@edinamn.gov. 6 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services 5. TIME REQUIREMENTS a) Anticipated Proposal Calendar The following is a list of key dates regarding the selection process: Pre - proposal meeting Due date for proposals Finalist Interviews, as necessary City Council Approval b) Notification October 31, 1:00 pm November 9, 4:30 pm November 13 -30 December 4 It is anticipated that the staff recommended firm will be notified prior to December 4. c) Schedule for the 2012 Fiscal Year Audit (this schedule is for the City of Edina, but the SMPSTF would follow a similar schedule should a different auditor be selected) Each of the following should be completed by the auditor no later than the dates indicated. i) Entrance conference — December 2012 The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss prior audit issues (if applicable) and the interim work to be performed. The auditor shall provide the City at the Entrance Conference both a detailed audit plan and a list of all schedules to be prepared by the City. If by mutual agreement it is determined this meeting would be better placed after interim work is completed, this will be an acceptable alternative. ii) Interim Work — January 2013 The schedule for interim work will be determined upon completion of selection process. It is desirable to complete as much work as possible on an interim basis. City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services iii) Fieldwork — April, 2013 The auditor shall complete all fieldwork by the middle of April. It is desirable that fieldwork be completed in one block of time. The auditor will schedule progress conferences as needed to discuss the status of fieldwork and any potential issues that arise. iv) Exit Conference — April or May 2013 The. purpose of this meeting will be to summarize the results of fieldwork, review significant findings,' and review reports to be issued. The auditor shall have drafts of the audit reports and final recommendations to management available for review at or prior to the Exit Conference. v) Final opinions and reports delivered to the City — May 31, 2013 vi) City of Edina auditor presentation at formal City Council meeting in June, if requested. Historically this involves a 10 -15 minute presentation with visuals. vii) SMPTF auditor presentation to Board in July, if requested. Historically this involves a brief oral presentation covering the audit process and any issues encountered. A similar time schedule will be developed for audits of future fiscal years if the City or SMPSTF. exercises its option for additional audits. 6. REPORT PREPARATION a) The City of Edina will :prepare and print its own. financial., statements. The auditor is. responsible for reviewing, editing, and providing the Independent Auditor's Report. b) The auditor will prepare and print financial statements for the SMPSTF. City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services 7. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS a) General Requirements i) Pre - Proposal Meeting There will be an optional pre - proposal meeting for all interested firms on October 31, 2012. This meeting will be held at Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 1:00 p.m. Interested firms are encouraged to submit questions in advance. The City will respond to all questions (advance and impromptu) in good faith at the meeting. Should follow -up to any questions be required after the meeting, the City will prepare and distribute written answers to interested firms on or about November 7, 2012 by request. The City reserves the right to extend the time to submit written questions after the pre - proposal meeting if necessary. ii) Contact Inquiries concerning the request for proposals must be made to: John Wallin, Finance Director (952) 826 -0414 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 iii) Submission of Proposals Four copies of each of the following materials are required to be received by John Wallin at the above address by 4:30 p.m. November 9, 2012 for a firm to be considered: a. Title Page Title page showing the request for proposals' subject; the firm's name; the name, address and telephone number of the contact person; and the date of the proposal. b. Table of Contents J City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services c. Transmittal Letter A signed letter of.transmittal briefly stating the proposers understanding of the work to be done, the commitment to .perform the-'work within the time period, a statement why the firm believes itself to be 'best qualified to perform the engagement and a statement that the proposal is a firm and irrevocable the, engagement, the three year period. d. Detailed Proposal The detailed proposal should follow the order set forth in Section 7b of this request for proposal. L Executed copy of Proposer Guarantees and Warranties (attached to this request for proposal- Appendix A) ii. Schedule of Professional Fees and Expenses for the Audit (attached to this request for proposal- Appendix B) b) Technical Proposal i) General Requirements The purpose of the Technical Proposal is to demonstrate the qualifications, competence and. capacity of the firms seeking to undertake an independent audit of the City in conformity with the requirements of this request for proposal. As such, the substance of the proposal will carry more weight than their form or manner of presentation. The technical Proposal: should demonstrate the qualifications of the firm and of the particular staff to be assigned to this engagement. It should also specify an audit approach that will meet the request for proposal requirements. The. Technical Proposal should address all the points outlined . in the ?request for proposal. The ,proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, .concise description of the proposer's capabilities to satisfy the requirements-of the request for proposal. While additional data may be presented, the following subjects, items Nos. ii through ix, must be included. They represent the criteria against which the proposal will be evaluated. 10 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services ii) Independence The firm should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of the City as defined by generally accepted auditing standards. The firm also should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of all the component units of the City and the SMPSTF as defined by those same standards. iii) License to Practice in Minnesota An affirmative statement should be included that the firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in Minnesota. iv) Firm Qualifications and Experience The Proposer should state the size of the firm, the size of the firm's governmental audit staff, the location of the office from which the work on this engagement is to be performed and the number and nature of the professional staff to be employed in this engagement on a full -time basis and the number and nature of the staff to be employed on a part-time basis. The firm is also required to submit a copy of the report on its most recent external quality control review, with a statement whether that quality control review included a review of specific government engagements. The firm shall also provide information on the results of any federal or state desk reviews or field reviews of its audits during the past three (3) years. In addition, the firm shall provide information on the circumstances and status of any disciplinary action taken or pending against the firm during the past three (3) years with state regulatory bodies or professional organizations. v) Similar Engagements With Other Government Entities For the firm's office that will be assigned responsibility for the audit, list the most significant engagements performed in the last three years that are similar to the engagement described in this request for proposal and are cities awarded the GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. These engagements should be ranked on the basis of total staff hours. Indicate the scope of work, date, engagement partners, total hours, and the name and telephone number of the principal client contact. Ii City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services vi) Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience Identify the principal supervisory and management staff, including engagement partners, managers, other supervisors and specialists, who would be assigned to the engagement. Indicate whether each such person is licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in Minnesota. Provide information on the government auditing experience of each person, including information on relevant continuing professional education for the past three (3) years and membership in professional organizations relevant to the performance of this audit. Provide as much information as possible regarding the number, qualifications, experience and training, including relevant continuing professional education, of the specific staff to be assigned to this engagement. Indicate how the quality of staff over the term of the agreement will be assured. Audit personnel may be changed at the discretion of the Proposer provided that replacements have substantially the same or better qualifications or experience. vii) Specific Audit Approach The proposal should set forth a work plan, including an explanation of the audit methodology to be followed, to perform the services required in this request for proposal. In developing the work plan, reference should be made to such sources of information as the City's budget and related materials, organizational charts, manuals and programs, and financial and other management information systems. Proposers should provide the following information on their approach: a. Proposed segmentation of the engagement b. Level of staff and number of hours to be assigned to each proposed segment of the engagement c. Sample size and the extent to which statistical sampling is to be used in the engagement d. Type and extent of analytical procedures to be used in the engagement e. Approach to be taken to gain and document an understanding of the internal control structure f. Approach to laws and regulations that will be subject to compliance test work 12 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services g. Approach to be taken in drawing audit samples for purposes of tests of compliance viii)Report Format The proposal should include sample formats for required reports. ix) The proposal should include an acknowledgment of the required audit schedule and a statement as to the firm's ability to meet the schedule. c) Dollar Cost Proposal (Appendix B) The City will not be responsible for expenses incurred in preparing and submitting the proposal. Such costs should not be included in the proposal. i) Total all- inclusive maximum price The dollar cost proposal should contain all pricing information relative to performing the audit engagement as described in this RFP. The total all - inclusive maximum price to be bid is to contain all direct and indirect costs including all out -of- pocket expenses. ii) Rates by Partner, Specialist, Supervisory and Staff Level Times Hours Anticipated for Each The dollar cost bid should include a schedule of professional fees and expenses, presented in the format provided in the attachment (Appendix B) that supports the total all- inclusive maximum price. iii) Rates for Additional Professional Services If it should become necessary for the City to request the auditor to render any additional services to either supplement the services requested in this RFP or to perform additional work as a result of the specific recommendations included in any report issued on this engagement, then such additional work shall be performed only if set forth in an addendum to the contract between the City and the firm. Any such additional work agreed to between the City and the firm shall be performed at the same rates set forth in the schedule of fees and expenses included in the dollar cost bid. 13 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services iv) Manner of Payment Progress payments will be .made on the basis of hours of work completed during the course of the engagement and out -of- pocket expenses incurred in accordance with the firm's dollar. cost .bid. proposal. Interim billing shall cover a period of not less than a calendar month. 8. EVALUATION PROCEDURES a) Review Committee A review committee of City and /or SMPSTF staff will evaluate proposals submitted. b) Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be evaluated using three sets of criteria. Firms meeting the mandatory criteria will have their proposals evaluated and scored for both technical qualifications and price. The following represent the principal selection criteria, which will be considered during the evaluation process: i) Mandatory Elements (1) The audit firm is independent and licensed to practice in Minnesota (2) The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed by the firm for the City and /or SMPSTF (3) The firm adheres to the, instructions in this request for proposal on preparing and submitting the.proposal .(4) The firm submits a. copy'of. its: last external quality control review report and the firm has a record of..quality audit work ii) Technical Qualifications: (1) Expertise and Experience (i) The firm's past experience and performance on comparable government engagements (ii) The quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the engagement and the quality. of the firm's management support personnel to be available fortechnical consultation 14 City of Edina, Minnesota Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services (2) Audit Approach (i) Adequacy of proposed staffing plan for various segments of the engagement (ii) Adequacy of analytical procedures and sampling techniques (iii) Ability to meet scheduled deadlines iii) Price The cost of the audit for the years 2012 -2014 should be calculated on the "Schedule of Professional Fees and Expenses" (Appendix B). Cost will not be the only factor the review committee will use to evaluate proposing firms. iv) Oral Presentation During the evaluation process, the review committee may, at its discretion, request any one or all firms to make oral presentations. Such presentations will provide firms with an opportunity to answer any questions the review committee may have on a firm's proposal. Not all firms may be asked to make such oral presentations. v) Final Selection The City intends to select a firm based upon the recommendation of the review committee. It is anticipated that the Council will approve the recommended firm on December 4, 2012. The SMPSTF Board only meets quarterly. The next meeting will be in late January to formally approve an auditor, although we will attempt to gain informal approval from Board Members earlier. vi) Right to Reject Proposals Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposal unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted. The City and SMPSTF reserve the right without prejudice to reject any or all proposals. 15 �t ,N]VA0I®�N v o ,colt or-ST o leas To: 0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV.G. From: John Keprios, Director Action X❑ Parks & Recreation Department Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Cunningham Group Architecture, Inc. Architect. Services Contract Agreement. Action Requested: Approve the attached Architect Services Contract Agreement between the City of Edina and Cunningham Group Architecture, Inc. who will provide architect services for designing the replacement of the Braemar Golf Dome and required amenities. Information / Background: As stated in the attached Architect Services Contract Agreement (AIA Document B 132 -2009) which is the form recommended by City Attorney Roger Knutson, the contract calls for compensation fee to Cunningham Group Architecture, Inc. of one - hundred eighty-six thousand, six - hundred dollars ($186,600) plus reimbursables. The initial 6/15/2012 contract agreement with Cunningham Group Architecture, Inc. for the Scoping/Schematic Design Phase was for $25,000 because at the start of the project the extent of the total replacement project was an unknown. This brings the architect fees for the project to a total of $211,000 which is approximately 7.2% of the construction cost of an estimated $3 million. This is within the 6 -8% of project construction cost fee range anticipated in the initial.6/ 15/2012 agreement. ATTACHMENTS: • AIA Document B132-2009 (Agreement Between Owner and Architect) City of Edina • 480 1' W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 AIA Document B132 TM -2009 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition AGREEMENT made effective as of the Tenth day of September in the year 2012 This document has important legal (In words, indicate day, month and year.) ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: Minneapolis, MN 55414 The author of this document has BETWEEN the Architect's client identified as the Owner: added information needed for its (Name, legal status, address and other information) completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original City of Edina Parks & Recreation AIA standard form. An Additions and Edina City Hall Deletions Report that notes added 4801 W. 50th Street information as well as revisions to the Edina, Minnesota 55424 standard form text is available from Telephone Number: 952- 927 -8861 the author and should be reviewed. A 6364 John Harris Drive vertical line in the left margin of this Edina, Minnesota 55439 document indicates where the author and the Architect: has added necessary information (Name, legal status, address and other information) and where the author has added to or The Construction Manager: deleted from the original AIA text. Cuningham Group Architecture, Inc. This document has important legal 201 Main Street SE, Suite 325 consequences. Consultation with an Minneapolis, MN 55414 attorney is encouraged with respect Telephone Number: 612- 379 -3400 to its completion or modification. Fax Number: 612- 379 -4400 This document is intended to be used for the following Project: in conjunction with AIA Documents A132Tm -2009, Standard Form of (Name, location and detailed description) Agreement Between Owner and Contractor, Construction Manager as Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Adviser Edition; A232Tm -2009, 6364 John Harris Drive General Conditions of the Contract Edina, Minnesota 55439 for Construction, Construction Design Development Through Construction Phase Services. Manager as Adviser Edition; and C1321m -2009, Standard Form of The Construction Manager: Agreement Between Owner and (Name, legal status, address and other information) Construction Manager as Adviser. RJM Construction AIA Document A232Tm -2009 is 7003 West Lake Street, Suite 400 adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other St. Louis Park, MN 55426 general conditions unless this Telephone Number: 952- 837 -8600 document is modified. Fax Number: 952- 832 -9600 The Owner and Architect agree as follows. AIA Document 8132T — 2009 (formerly 8141 mCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Wt WARNING: This AIA* Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. l This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1 39 61 97 70 5 -1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 INITIAL INFORMATION 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 4 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 6 COST OF THE WORK 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11 COMPENSATION 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1 INITIAL INFORMATION § 1.1 This Agreement is based on the Initial Information set forth in this Section 1.1. (Note the disposition for the following items by inserting the requested information or a statement such as "not applicable, " "unknown at time of execution" or "to be determined later by mutual agreement.') Architect understands that the City intends to replace /rebuild the Braemar Golf Dome at 6364 John Harris Drive, Edina, Minnesota 55439 following a fire. We understand the Project will include the following listed elements. These are as described in: (i) the Schematic Design and additional professional services provided under the prior agreement with the Owner; And (ii) in Quote Package 1, Bid Package 1, and the Accessory Building Design Development sets by Cuningham Group, during drafting and finalization of this Proposal and Agreement (to be billed under this Agreement), together with the Estimate Summary dated 11/13/2012 prepared by City's Construction Manager RJM Construction: 1. Replacement of the dome fabric and cables, with attachment to the same footings. Potential conversion to insulated membrane as an Alternate. Change to attachment of cables at roughly 50' section where it was connected to the building and where new footings will be required. 2. Replacement lights, by dome supplier. 3. Replacement and relocation of the standby mechanical unit that was in the building. Other units to remain. 4. Replacement of deck for second level driving stations with one of non - combustible construction. 5. New fire sprinkler system as required for full -year use of dome, including 'fire cannons' for full dome, and possibly also a fixed system over the driving deck. 6. New padded artificial turf over asphalt, from roughly 5' in front of the deck to the back of the air structure. 7. A replacement accessory building to include entry/lobby, check -in counter, refreshments area, restrooms, office and mechanical room. 8. Underground utilities, to include underground infiltration chambers to handle stormwater run -off for disturbed areas, per Watershed requirements. 9. Repair and enlargement of the parking lot. AIA Document B132- — 2009 (formerly 13141T CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. IniL WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 2 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) Note: Scope does not include design of any demolition to the existing building or dome components; we understand the Owner's Construction Manager will perform that work. § 1.1.1 The Owner's program for the Project: (Identify documentation or state the manner in which the program ivill be developed.) Owner's program was developed under an earlier agreement and is reflected in the documents listed in 1.1 above. § 1.1.2 The Project's physical characteristics: (Identify or describe, if appropriate, size, location, dimensions, or other pertinent information, such as geotechnical reports; site, boundary and topographic surveys; traffic and utility studies; availability of public and private utilities and services; legal description of the site; etc.) NA § 1.1.3 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, as defined in Section 6.1: (Provide total and, if known, a line item breakdown) The Owner's budget is not finalized, but is generally reflected in the Estimate Summary dated November Thirteen, Two Thousand Twelve, prepared by the City's Construction Manager. § 1.1.4 The Owner's anticipated design and construction schedule: .1 Design phase milestone dates, if any: Phase I: Design and documentation to be complete by November Eighth, Two Thousand Twelve; Phase II: Design and documentation to be complete by January Two, Two Thousand Thirteen. .2 Commencement of construction: To be determined; either January, Two Thousand Thirteen, or April, Two Thousand Thirteen .3 Substantial Completion date or milestone dates: Fall, Two Thousand Thirteen .4 Other: § 1.1.5 The Owner intends to retain a Construction Manager adviser and: (Note that, if Multiple Prime Contractors are used, the term "Contractor" as referred to throughout this Agreement ►vill be as if plural in number.) [ ] One Contractor [ X ] Multiple Prime Contractors [ ] Unknown at time of execution § 1.1.6 The Owner's requirements for accelerated or fast -track scheduling, multiple bid packages, or phased construction are set forth below: (List number and type of bid/procurement packages.) Two major bid packages and two major construction phases; to be finalized by January, Two Thousand Thirteen. AIA Document B1 3211 — 2009 (formerly 8141 T"CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init WARNING: This AIA* Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° 3 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No. 1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 1.1.7 Other Project information: (Identify special characteristics or needs of the Project not provided elsewhere, such as environmentally responsible design or historic preservation requirements.) N/A § 1.1.8 The Owner identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 5.4: (List name, address and other information) Todd Anderson, General Manager Braemar Golf Course 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 § 1.1.9 The persons or entities, in addition to the Owner's representative, who are required to review the Architect's submittals to the Owner are as follows: (List name, address and other information.) N/A § 1.1.10 The Owner will retain the following consultants: (List name, legal status, address and other information.) .1 Construction Manager: The Construction Manager is identified on the cover page. .2 Cost Consultant (if in addition to the Construction Manager): (If a Cost Consultant is retained, appropriate references to the Cost Consultant should be inserted in Sections 3. 2. 6, 3. 2. 7, 3. 3. 2, 3. 3. 3, 3. 4. 5, 3 .4.6,5.4,6.3,6.3.1,6.4 and 11.6.) None. Owner's Construction Manager will review all Project Cost Estimates. .3 Land Surveyor: Previously Retained .4 Geotechnical Engineer: Previously Retained AIA Document B1321" — 2009 (formerly B141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init WARNING: This AIA* Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° 4 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. / This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11129/2012 under Order No.1396197705 -1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) , T .5 Civil Engineer: N/A .6 Other consultants: (List any other consultants retained by the Owner, such as a Project or Program Manager, or scheduling consultant) N/A § 1.1.11 The Architect identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 2.3: (List name, address and other information.) Kathryn M. Wallace, AIA, Principal Tunde Olusanya, Technical Support 201 Main Street SE, Suite 325 Minneapolis, MN 55414 § 1.1.12 The Architect will retain the consultants identified in Sections 1.1.12.1 and 1.1.12.2: (List name, legal status, address and other information.) § 1.1.12.1 Consultants retained under Basic Services: .1 Structural Engineer: Clark Engineering 621 Lilac Drive North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 -4609 .2 Mechanical Engineer: Hallberg Engineering, Inc. 1750 Commerce Court White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 .3 Electrical Engineer: Hallberg Engineering, Inc. 1750 Commerce Court White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 .4 Civil Engineer: Anderson - Johnson Associates, Inc. AIA Document 81321" — 2009 (formerly 8141 T"CIUa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® rJ Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11129/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12108/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669} 7575 Golden Valley Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 § 1.1.12.2 Consultants retained under Additional Services: N/A § 1.1.13 Other Initial Information on which the Agreement is based: N/A § 1.2 The Owner and Architect may rely on the Initial Information. Both parties, however, recognize that such information may materially change and, in that event, the Owner and the Architect shall appropriately adjust the schedule, the Architect's services and the Architect's compensation. ARTICLE 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 2.1 The Architect shall provide the professional services as set forth in this Agreement. § 2.2 The Architect shall perform its services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances. The Architect shall perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with such professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project. § 2.3 The Architect shall provide its services in conjunction with the services of a Construction Manager as described in AIA Document C 132Tm -2009, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager. The Architect shall not be responsible for actions taken by the Construction Manager. § 2.4 The Architect shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Architect with respect to the Project. § 2.5 Except with the Owner's knowledge and consent, the Architect shall not engage in any activity, or accept any employment, interest or contribution that would reasonably appear to compromise the Architect's professional judgment with respect to this Project. § 2.6 The Architect shall maintain the following insurance for the duration of this Agreement. If any of the requirements set forth below exceed the types and limits the Architect normally maintains, the Owner shall reimburse the Architect for any additional cost. § 2.6.1 Comprehensive General Liability with policy limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 ) for each occurrence and in the aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. § 2.6.2 Automobile Liability covering owned and rented vehicles operated by the Architect with policy limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 ) combined single limit and aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. § 2.6.3 The Architect may use umbrella or excess liability insurance to achieve the required coverage for Comprehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability, provided that such umbrella or excess insurance results in the same type of coverage as required for the individual policies. § 2.6.4 Workers' Compensation at statutory limits and Employers Liability with a policy limit of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00 ). § 2.6.5 Professional Liability covering the Architect's negligent acts, errors and omissions in its performance of professional services with policy limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 ) per claim and in the aggregate. AIA Document B132T — 2009 (formerly 8141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright 01992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA* 6 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No. 1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 2.6.6 The Architect shall provide to the Owner certificates of insurance evidencing compliance with the requirements in this Section 2.6. The certificates will show the Owner as an additional insured on the Comprehensive General Liability, Automobile Liability, umbrella or excess policies. ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES § 3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described in Article 3 and include usual and customary civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in this Article 3 are Additional Services. § 3.1.1 The Architect shall manage the Architect's services, consult with the Owner and the Construction Manager, research applicable design criteria, attend Project meetings, communicate with members of the Project team and report progress to the Owner. § 3.1.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner, the Construction Manager and the Owner's other consultants. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of services and information furnished by the Owner, the Construction Manager, and the Owner's other consultants. The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error, omission or inconsistency in such services or information. § 3.1.3 As soon as practicable after the date of this Agreement, the Architect shall submit to the Owner and the Construction Manager a schedule of the Architect's services for inclusion in the Project schedule prepared by the Construction Manager. The schedule of the Architect's services shall include design milestone dates, anticipated dates when cost estimates or design reviews may occur, and allowances for periods of time required (1) for the Owner's review, (2) for the Construction Manager's review, (3) for the performance of the Owner's consultants, and (4) for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. § 3.1.4 The Architect shall submit information to the Construction Manager and participate in developing and revising the Project schedule as it relates to the Architect's services. § 3.1.5 Once the Owner and the Architect agree to the time limits established by the Project schedule, the Owner and the Architect shall not exceed them, except for reasonable cause. § 3.1.6 The Architect shall not be responsible for an Owner's directive or substitution, or for the Owner's acceptance of non - conforming Work, made without the Architect's approval. § 3.1.7 The Architect shall, at appropriate times, in coordination with the Construction Manager, contact the governmental authorities required to approve the Construction Documents and the entities providing utility services to the Project. In designing the Project, the Architect shall respond to applicable design requirements imposed by such governmental authorities and by such entities providing utility services. § 3.1.8 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. § 3.2 Schematic Design Phase Services § 3.2.1 Performed under prior agreement. (Paragraphs deleted) § 3.3 Design Development Phase Services § 3.3.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents, and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work pursuant to Section 5.4, the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Owner's approval and the Construction Manager's review. The Design Development Documents shall be based upon information provided, and estimates prepared by, the Construction Manager and shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans, sections, elevations, typical construction details, and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, and such other elements as may be Init. AIA Document B132m — 2009 (formerly 8141 MCMa — 1992). Copyright ®1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA! Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this A10 7 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) appropriate. The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish in general their quality levels. § 3.3.2 Prior to the conclusion of the Design Development Phase, the Architect shall submit the Design Development Documents to the Owner and the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Construction Manager to review the Design Development Documents. § 3.3.3 Upon receipt of the Construction Manager's information and estimate at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase, the Architect shall take action as required under Sections 6.5 and 6.6 and request the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents. § 3.4 Construction Documents Phase Services § 3.4.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents, and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall prepare Construction Documents for the Owner's approval and the Construction Manager's review. The Construction Documents shall illustrate and describe the further development of the approved Design Development Documents and shall consist of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the quality levels of materials and systems and other requirements for the construction of the Work. The Owner and Architect acknowledge that in order to construct the Work the Contractor will provide additional information, including Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples and other similar submittals, which the Architect shall review in accordance with Section 3.6.4. § 3.4.2 The Architect shall incorporate into the Construction Documents the design requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. § 3.4.3 During the development of the Construction Documents, if requested by the Owner, the Architect shall assist the Owner and the Construction Manager in the development and preparation of (1) bidding and procurement information that describes the time, place and conditions of bidding, including bidding or proposal forms; (2) the form of agreement between the Owner and Contractor; and (3) the Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary and other Conditions); and (4) compile a project manual that includes the Conditions of the Contract for Construction and may include bidding requirements and sample forms. § 3.4.4 Prior to the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase, the Architect shall submit the Construction Documents to the Owner and the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Construction Manager to review the Construction Documents. § 3.4.5 Upon receipt of the Construction Manager's information and estimate at the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase, the Architect shall take action as required under Section 6.7 and request the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents. § 3.5 Bidding or Negotiation Phase Services § 3.5.1 General The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in establishing a list of prospective contractors. Following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents, the Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in (1) obtaining either competitive bids or negotiated proposals; (2) confirming responsiveness of bids or proposals; (3) determining the successful bid or proposal, if any; and (4) awarding and preparing contracts for construction. § 3.5.2 Competitive Bidding § 3.5.2.1 Bidding Documents shall consist of bidding requirements and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.2.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in bidding the Project by (Paragraph deleted) .2 participating in a pre -bid conference for prospective bidders, and .3 preparing responses to questions from prospective bidders and providing clarifications and interpretations of the Bidding Documents in the form of addenda. AIA Document 813210 - 2009 (formerly B1411 "CMa - 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® $ Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No. 1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 3.5.2.3 The Architect shall consider requests for substitutions, if the Bidding Documents permit substitutions, and shall consult with the Construction Manager and "prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective bidders. § 3.5.3 Negotiated Proposals § 3.5.3.1 Proposal Documents shall consist of proposal requirements, and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in obtaining proposals by .1 facilitating the reproduction of Proposal Documents for distribution to prospective contractors, and requesting their return upon completion of the negotiation process; .2 participating in selection interviews with prospective contractors; and .3 participating in negotiations with prospective contractors. § 3.5.3.3 The Architect shall consider requests for substitutions, if the Proposal Documents permit substitutions, and shall consult with the Construction Manager and prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective contractors. § 3.6 Construction Phase Services § 3.6.1 General § 3.6.1.1 The Architect shall provide administration of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as set forth below and in AIA Document A232Tm -2009, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition. If the Owner and Contractor modify AIA Document A232 -2009, those modifications shall not affect the Architect's services under this Agreement unless the Owner and the Architect amend this Agreement. § 3.6.1.2 The Architect shall advise and consult with the Owner and Construction Manager during the Construction Phase Services. The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in this Agreement. The Architect shall not have control over, charge of, or responsibility for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, nor shall the Architect be responsible for the Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Architect shall be responsible for the Architect's negligent acts or omissions, but shall not have control over or charge of, and shall not be responsible for, acts or omissions of the Construction Manager, or the Contractor or of any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.3, the Architect's responsibility to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and terminates at the end of the one year Contractor's Construction Warranty Period. § 3.6.2 Evaluations of the Work § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.3.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and report to the Owner and the Construction Manager (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent construction schedule, and (2) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work. § 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents and shall notify the Construction Manager about the rejection. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect, upon written authorization from the Owner and notification to the Construction Manager, shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. AIA Document B13211 — 2009 (formerly B1411mCIVta — 1992). Copyright ®1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIAO 9 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of the Construction Manager, Owner, or Contractor through the Construction Manager. The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. § 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by Contractor, and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The Owner's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term is defined in AIA Document A232 -2009, the Architect shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.3 Certificates for Payment to Contractor § 3.6.3.1 The Architect shall review and certify an application for payment not more frequently than monthly. Within seven days after the Architect receives an application for payment forwarded from the Construction Manager, the Architect shall review and certify the application as follows: .1 Where there is only one Contractor responsible for performing the Work, the Architect shall review the Contractor's Application and Certificate for Payment that the Construction Manager has previously reviewed and certified. The Architect shall certify the amount due the Contractor and shall issue a Certificate for Payment in such amount. .2 Where there are Multiple Prime Contractors responsible for performing different portions of the Project, the Architect shall review a Project Application and Project Certificate for Payment, with a Summary of Contractors' Applications for Payment, that the Construction Manager has previously prepared, reviewed and certified. The Architect shall certify the amounts due the Contractors and shall issue a Project Certificate for Payment in the total of such amounts. § 3.6.3.2 The Architect's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on (1) the Architect's evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2, (2) the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment or the data comprising the Project Application for Payment, and (3) the recommendation of the Construction Manager, that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief, the Work has progressed to the point indicated and that the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject (1) to an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, (2) to results of subsequent tests and inspections, (3) to correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion, and (4) to specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. § 3.6.3.3 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment or a Project Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work, (2) reviewed construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and material suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor's right to payment, or (4) ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract Sum. § 3.6.3.4 The Architect shall maintain a record of the applications and certificates for payment. § 3.6.4 Submittals § 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Construction Manager's Project submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or withhold approval. The Architect's action in reviewing submittals transmitted by the Construction Manager shall be taken in accordance with the approved submittal schedule or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness while allowing sufficient time in the Architect's professional judgment to permit adequate review. § 3.6.4.2 In accordance with the Architect - approved Project submittal schedule, and after the Construction Manager reviews, approves and transmits the submittals, the Architect shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon the Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for the limited purpose AIA Document B132TM —2009 (formerly B141 T"CMa — 1992). Copyright 01992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. [nit WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIAo 10 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/0812012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review of such submittals is not for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such as dimensions, quantities, and installation or performance of equipment or systems, which are the Contractor's responsibility. The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or, unless otherwise specifically stated by the Architect, of any construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. § 3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractor to provide professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials or equipment, the Architect shall specify the appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review shop drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the design professional retained by the Contractor that bear such professional's seal and signature when submitted to the Architect. The Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services, certifications and approvals performed or provided by such design professionals. § 3.6.4.4 After receipt of the Construction Manager's recommendations, and subject to the provisions of Section 4.3, the Architect shall review and respond to requests for information about the Contract Documents. The Architect, in consultation with the Construction Manager, shall set forth in the Contract Documents the requirements for requests for information. Requests for information shall include, at a minimum, a detailed written statement that indicates the specific Drawings or Specifications in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification requested. The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon, or otherwise with reasonable promptness. If appropriate, the Architect shall prepare and issue supplemental Drawings and Specifications in response to requests for information. § 3.6.4.5 The Architect shall maintain a record of submittals and copies of submittals transmitted by the Construction Manager in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5 Changes in the Work § 3.6.5.1 The Architect shall review and sign, or take other appropriate action, on Change Orders and Construction Change Directives prepared by the Construction Manager for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5.2 The Architect may authorize minor changes in the Work that are consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents and do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time. Such changes shall be effected by written order issued by the Architect through the Construction Manager. § 3.6.5.3 The Architect shall maintain records relative to changes in the Work. § 3.6.6 Project Completion § 3.6.6.1 The Architect, assisted by the Construction Manager, shall conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of Substantial Completion and the date of final completion; issue Certificates of Substantial Completion prepared by the Construction Manager; receive from the Construction Manager and review written warranties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor; and, after receipt of a final Contractor's Application and Certificate for Payment or a final Project Application and Project Certificate for Payment from the Construction Manager, issue a final Certificate for Payment based upon a final inspection indicating the Work complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.6.2 The Architect's inspections shall be conducted with the Owner and Construction Manager to check conformance of the Work with the requirements of the Contract Documents and to verify the accuracy and completeness of the list submitted by the Construction Manager and Contractor of Work to be completed or corrected. § 3.6.6.3 When the Work is found to be substantially complete by the Construction Manager and Architect, and after certification by the Construction Manager and the Architect, the Architect shall inform the Owner about the balance of the Contract Sum remaining to be paid the Contractor, including the amount to be retained from the Contract Sum, if any, for final completion or correction of the Work. AIA Document B132- — 2009 (formerly 8141 TM CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init WARNING: This AIA! Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 11 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11129/2012 under Order No.1 3961977051 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 3.6.6.4 Upon request of the Owner, and prior to the expiration of one year from the date of Substantial Completion, the Architect shall, without additional compensation, conduct a meeting with the Owner to review the facility operations and performance. ARTICLE 4 ADDITIONAL SERVICES § 4.1 Additional Services listed below are not included in Basic Services but may be required for the Project. The Architect shall provide the listed Additional Services only if specifically designated in the table below as the Architect's responsibility, and the Owner shall compensate the Architect as provided in Section 11.2. (Designate the Additional Services the Architect shall provide in the second column of the table beloly. In the third column indicate whether the service description is located in Section 4.2 or in an attached exhibit. If in an exhibit, identify the exhibit.) Services Responsibility (Architect, Olvner or Not Provided Location of Service Description (Section 4.2 below or in an exhibit attached to this document and identified beloly 4.1.1 Programming 4.1.2 Multiple preliminary designs 4.1.3 Measured drawings 4.1.4 Existing facilities surveys 4.1.5 Site evaluation and planning (B203TM -2007 4.1.6 Building information modeling 4.1.7 Civil engineering 4.1.8 Landscape design 4.1.9 Architectural interior design B252TM -2007 4.1.10 Value analysis B204TM -2007 4.1.11 Detailed cost estimating 4.1.12 On -site project representation (B207rM -2008) 4.1.13 Conformed construction documents 4.1.14 As-designed record drawings 4.1.15 As- constructed record drawings 4.1.16 Post occupancy evaluation 4.1.17 Facility support services B210TM -2007 4.1.18 Tenant- related services 4.1.19 Coordination of Owner's consultants 4.1.20 Telecommunications /data design 4.1.21 Security evaluation and planning (B206Tm-2007) 4.1.22 Commissioning B211TM -2007 4.1.23 Extensive environmentally responsible design 4.1.24 LEED' certification B214TM -2007 4.1.25 Historic preservation B205TM -2007 § 4.1.26 Furniture, furnishings, and equipment design B253TM -2007) § 4.2 Insert a description of each Additional Service designated in Section 4.1 as the Architect's responsibility, if not further described in an exhibit attached to this document. § 4.3 Additional Services may be provided after execution of this Agreement, without invalidating the Agreement. Except for services required due to the fault of the Architect, any Additional Services provided in accordance with this Section 4.3 shall entitle the Architect to compensation pursuant to Section 11.3 and an appropriate adjustment in the Architect's schedule. [nit AIA Document 81 32m — 2009 (formerly B141 T"CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights re served. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIAe 12 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 4.3.1 Upon recognizing the need to perform the following Additional Services, the Architect shall notify the Owner with reasonable promptness and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. The Architect shall not proceed to provide the following services until the Architect receives the Owner's written authorization: .1 Services necessitated by a change in the Initial Information, previous instructions or recommendations given by the Construction Manager or the Owner, or approvals given by the Owner, or a material change in the Project including, but not limited to, size, quality, complexity, building systems, the Owner's schedule or budget for Cost of the Work, constructability considerations, procurement or delivery method, or bid packages in addition to those listed in Section 1.1.6; .2 Making revisions in Drawings, Specifications, or other documents (as required pursuant to Section 6.7), when such revisions are required because the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget, except where such excess is due to changes initiated by the Architect in scope, capacities of basic systems, or the kinds and quality of materials, finishes or equipment; .3 Services necessitated by the Owner's request for extensive environmentally responsible design alternatives, such as unique system designs, in -depth material research, energy modeling, or LEEDS certification; .4 Changing or editing previously prepared Instruments of Service necessitated by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations or official interpretations; .5 Services necessitated by decisions of the Owner or Construction Manager not rendered in a timely manner or any other failure of performance on the part of the Owner, Construction Manager or the Owner's other consultants or contractors; .6 Preparing digital data for transmission to the Owner's consultants and contractors, or to other Owner authorized recipients; .7 Preparation of design and documentation for alternate bid or proposal requests proposed by the Owner or Construction Manager; .8 Preparation for, and attendance at, a public presentation, meeting or hearing; .9 Preparation for, and attendance at a dispute resolution proceeding or legal proceeding, except where the Architect is party thereto; .10 Evaluation of the qualifications of bidders or persons providing proposals; .11 Consultation concerning replacement of Work resulting from fire or other cause during construction; or .12 Assistance to the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect. § 4.3.2 To avoid delay in the Construction Phase, the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services, notify the Owner with reasonable promptness, and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. If the Owner subsequently determines that all or parts of those services are not required, the Owner shall give written notice to the Architect, and the Owner shall have no further obligation to compensate the Architect for those services: .1 Reviewing a Contractor's submittal out of sequence from the initial Project submittal schedule agreed to by the Architect; .2 Responding to the Contractor's requests for information that are not prepared in accordance with the Contract Documents or where such information is available to the Contractor from a careful study and comparison of the Contract Documents, field conditions, other Owner- provided information, Contractor- prepared coordination drawings, or prior Project correspondence or documentation; .3 Preparing Change Orders, and Construction Change Directives that require evaluation of Contractor's proposals and supporting data, or the preparation or revision of Instruments of Service; .4 Evaluating an extensive number of Claims as the Initial Decision Maker; .5 Evaluating substitutions proposed by the Owner, Construction Manager or Contractor and making subsequent revisions to Instruments of Service resulting therefrom; or .6 To the extent the Architect's Basic Services are affected, providing Construction Phase Services 60 days after (1) the date of Substantial Completion of the Work or (2) the anticipated date of Substantial Completion, identified in Initial Information, whichever is earlier. § 4.3.3 The Architect shall provide Construction Phase Services exceeding the limits set forth below as Additional Services. When the limits below are reached, the Architect shall notify the Owner: .1 Two ( 2 ) reviews of each Shop Drawing, Product Data item, sample and similar submittals of the Contractor .2 Twenty Four ( 24 ) visits to the site by the Architect over the duration of the Project during construction AIA Document B1321" — 2009 (formerly B141 TMCIIAa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 13 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) .3 Two ( 2 ) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents .4 Two ( 2 ) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine final completion (Paragraph deleted) ARTICLE 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 5.1 Unless otherwise provided for under this Agreement, the Owner shall provide information in a timely manner regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project, including a written program which shall set forth the Owner's objectives, schedule, constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relationships, flexibility, expandability, special equipment, systems and site requirements. Within 15 days after receipt of a written request from the Architect, the Owner shall furnish the requested information as necessary and relevant for the Architect to evaluate, give notice of or enforce lien rights. § 5.2 The Owner shall retain a Construction Manager to provide services, duties and responsibilities as described in AIA Document C 132 -2009, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager. The Owner shall provide the Architect a copy of the executed agreement between the Owner and the Construction Manager, and any further modifications to the agreement. § 5.3 The Owner shall furnish the services of a Construction Manager that shall be responsible for creating the overall Project schedule. The Owner shall adjust the Project schedule, if necessary, as the Project proceeds. § 5.4 The Owner shall establish and periodically update the Owner's budget for the Project, including (1) the budget for the Cost of the Work as defined in Section 6.1, (2) the Owner's other costs, and (3) reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. The Owner shall furnish the services of a Construction Manager that shall be responsible for preparing all estimates of the Cost of the Work. If the Owner significantly increases or decreases the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall notify the Architect and the Construction Manager. The Owner and the Architect, in consultation with the Construction Manager, shall thereafter agree to a corresponding change in the budget for the Cost of the Work or in the Project's scope and quality. § 5.4.1 The Owner acknowledges that accelerated, phased or fast -track scheduling provides a benefit, but also carries with it associated risks. Such risks include the Owner incurring costs for the Architect to coordinate and redesign portions of the Project affected by procuring or installing elements of the Project prior to the completion of all relevant Construction Documents, and costs for the Contractor to remove and replace previously installed Work. If the Owner selects accelerated, phased or fast -track scheduling, the Owner agrees to include in the budget for the Project sufficient contingencies to cover such costs. § 5.5 The Owner shall identify a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner shall render decisions and approve the Architect's submittals in a timely manner in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Architect's services. § 5.6 The Owner shall furnish surveys to describe physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project, and a written legal description of the site. The surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property and structures; designated wetlands; adjacent drainage; rights -of -way, restrictions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and necessary data with respect to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and information concerning available utility services and lines, both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. All the information on the survey shall be referenced to a Project benchmark. § 5.7 The Owner shall furnish services of geotechnical engineers, which may include but are not limited to test borings, test pits, determinations of soil bearing values, percolation tests, evaluations of hazardous materials, seismic evaluation, ground corrosion tests and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for anticipating subsoil conditions, with written reports and appropriate recommendations. § 5.8 The Owner shall coordinate the services of its own consultants with those services provided by the Architect. Upon the Architect's request, the Owner shall furnish copies of the scope of services in the contracts between the Owner and the Owner's consultants. The Owner shall furnish the services ofconsultants other than those designated in Init AIA Document B132m - 2009 (formerly B141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA* 4 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705 -1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) this Agreement, or authorize the Architect to furnish them as an Additional Service, when the Architect requests such services and demonstrates that they are reasonably required by the scope of the Project. The Owner shall require that its consultants maintain professional liability insurance and other liability insurance as appropriate to the services provided. § 5.9 The Owner shall furnish tests, inspections and reports required by law or the Contract Documents, such as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, tests for air and water pollution, and tests for hazardous materials. § 5.10 The Owner shall furnish all legal, insurance and accounting services, including auditing services, that may be reasonably necessary at any time for the Project to meet the Owner's needs and interests. § 5.11 The Owner shall provide prompt written notice to the Architect and Construction Manager if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, including errors, omissions or inconsistencies in the Architect's Instruments of Service. § 5.12 Except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents or when direct communications have been specially authorized, the Owner shall endeavor to communicate with the Contractor through the Construction Manager, and shall contemporaneously provide the same communications to the Architect about matters arising out of or relating to the Contract Documents. Communications by and with the Architect's consultants shall be through the Architect. § 5.13 Before executing the Contract for Construction, the Owner shall coordinate the Architect's duties and responsibilities set forth in the Contract for Construction with the Architect's services set forth in this Agreement. The Owner shall provide the Architect a copy of the executed agreement between the Owner and Contractor, including the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. § 5.14 The Owner shall provide the Architect access to the Project site prior to commencement of the Work and shall obligate the Construction Manager and Contractor to provide the Architect access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. ARTICLE 6 COST OF THE WORK § 6.1 For purposes of this Agreement, the Cost of the Work shall be the total cost to the Owner to construct all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect and shall include the contractors' general conditions costs, overhead and profit. The Cost of the Work includes the compensation of the Construction Manager and Construction Manager's consultants during the Construction Phase only, including compensation for reimbursable expenses at the job site, if any. The Cost of the Work does not include the compensation of the Architect, the costs of the land, rights -of -way, financing, contingencies for changes in the Work or other costs that are the responsibility of the Owner. § 6.2 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work is provided in Initial Information, and may be adjusted throughout the Project as required under Sections 5.4 and 6.4. Evaluations of the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work represent the Architect's judgment as a design professional. § 6.3 The Owner shall require the Construction Manager to include appropriate contingencies for design, bidding or negotiating, price escalation, and market conditions in estimates of the Cost of the Work. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of estimates of the Cost of the Work the Construction Manager prepares as the Architect progresses with its Basic Services. The Architect shall prepare, as an Additional Service, revisions to the Drawings, Specifications or other documents required due to the Construction Manager's inaccuracies or incompleteness in preparing cost estimates. The Architect may review the Construction Manager's estimates solely for the Architect's guidance in completion of its services, however, the Architect shall report to the Owner any material inaccuracies and inconsistencies noted during any such review. § 6.3.1 If the Architect is providing detailed cost estimating services as an Additional Service, and a discrepancy exists between the Construction Manager's cost estimates and the Architect's cost estimates, the Architect and the Construction Manager shall work cooperatively to conform the cost estimates to one another. § 6.4 If, prior to the conclusion of the Design Development Phase, the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect, in consultation with the Construction Init AIA Document B132TM —2009 (formerly 8141 ° CIVIa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 15 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/2912012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) Manager, shall make appropriate recommendations to the Owner to adjust the Project's size, quality or budget, and the Owner shall cooperate with the Architect in making such adjustments. § 6.5 If the estimate of the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall .1 give written approval of an increase in the budget for the Cost of the Work; .2 in consultation with the Architect and Construction Manager, revise the Project program, scope, or quality as required to reduce the Cost of the Work; or .3 implement any other mutually acceptable alternative. § 6.6 If the Owner chooses to proceed under Section 6.5.2, the Architect, without additional compensation, shall incorporate the required modifications in the Construction Documents Phase as necessary to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase Services, or the budget as adjusted under Section 6.5.1. The Architect's modification of the Construction Documents shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility as a Basic Service under this Article 6. § 6.7 After incorporation of modifications under Section 6.6, the Architect shall, as an Additional Service, make any required revisions to the Drawings, Specifications or other documents necessitated by subsequent cost estimates that exceed the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, except when the excess is due to changes initiated by the Architect in scope, basic systems, or the kinds and quality of materials, finishes or equipment. ARTICLE 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES § 7.1 The Architect and the Owner warrant that in transmitting Instruments of Service, or any other information, the transmitting party is the copyright owner of such information or has permission from the copyright owner to transmit such information for its use on the Project. If the Owner and Architect intend to transmit Instruments of Service or any other information or documentation in digital form, they shall endeavor to establish necessary protocols governing such transmissions. § 7.2 The Owner shall be deemed the owner of The Instruments of Service, including the Drawings and Specifications, and shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including copyrights. Submission or distribution of Instruments of Service to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the reserved rights of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. (Paragraphs deleted) § 7.3.1 In the event the Owner uses the Instruments of Service without retaining the authors of the Instruments of Service, the Owner releases the Architect and Architect's consultant(s) from all claims and causes of action arising from such uses. The Owner, to the extent permitted by law, further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Architect and its consultants from all costs and expenses, including the cost of defense, related to claims and causes of action asserted by any third person or entity to the extent such costs and expenses arise from the Owner's use of the Instruments of Service under this Section 7.3.1. The terms of this Section 7.3.1 shall not apply if the Owner rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause under Section 9.4. (Paragraph deleted) ARTICLE 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES § 8.1 General § 8.1.1 The Owner and Architect shall commence all claims and causes of action, whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, against the other arising out of or related to this Agreement in accordance with the requirements of the method of binding dispute resolution selected in this Agreement within the period specified by applicable law, but in any case not more than 10 years after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work. The Owner and Architect waive all claims and causes of action not commenced in accordance with this Section 8.1.1. § 8.1.2 To the extent damages are covered by property insurance, the Owner and Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors, consultants, agents and employees of the other for damages, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance as set forth in AIA Document A232 -2009, General Conditions of AIA Document B132T0 — 2009 (formerly 8141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ®1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this Ale 16 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) the Contract for Construction. The Owner or the Architect, as appropriate, shall require of the Construction Manager, contractors, consultants, agents and employees of any of them similar waivers in favor of the other parties enumerated herein. § 8.1.3 The Architect shall indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner's officers and employees harmless from and against damages, losses and judgments arising from claims by third parties, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses recoverable under applicable law, but only to the extent they are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Architect, its employees and its consultants in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. The Architect's duty to indemnify the Owner under this provision shall be limited to the available proceeds of insurance coverage. § 8.1.4 The Architect and Owner waive consequential damages for claims, disputes or other matters in question arising out of or relating to this Agreement. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, to all consequential damages due to either party's termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in Section 9.7. § 8.2 Mediation § 8.2.1 Any claim, dispute or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to binding dispute resolution. If such matter relates to or is the subject of a lien arising out of the Architect's services, the Architect may proceed in accordance with applicable law to comply with the lien notice or filing deadlines prior to resolution of the matter by mediation or by binding dispute resolution. § 8.2.2 The Owner and Architect shall endeavor to resolve claims, disputes and other matters in question between them by mediation which, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise, shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Mediation Procedures in effect on the date of the Agreement. A request for mediation shall be made in writing, delivered to the other party to the Contract, and filed with the person or entity administering the mediation. The request may be made concurrently with the filing of a complaint or other appropriate demand for binding dispute resolution but, in such event, mediation shall proceed in advance of binding dispute resolution proceedings, which shall be stayed pending mediation for a period of 60 days from the date of filing, unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the parties or court order. § 8.2.3 The parties shall share the mediator's fee and any filing fees equally. The mediation shall be held in the place where the Project is located, unless another location is mutually agreed upon. Agreements reached in mediation shall be enforceable as settlement agreements in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 8.2.4 If the parties do not resolve a dispute through mediation pursuant to this Section 8.2, the method of binding dispute resolution shall be the following: (Check the appropriate box. If the Owner and Architect do not select a method of binding dispute resolution below, or do not subsequently agree in writing to a binding dispute resolution method other than litigation, the dispute will be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction.) [ ] Arbitration pursuant to Section 8.3 of this Agreement. [ X ] Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction. [ ) Other: (Spec) (Paragraphs deleted) ARTICLE 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION § 9.1 If the Owner fails to make payments to the Architect in accordance with this Agreement, such failure shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination or, at the Architect's option, cause for suspension of performance of services under this Agreement. If the Architect elects to suspend services, the Architect shall give seven days' written notice to the Owner before suspending services. In the event of a suspension of services, the Architect shall have no liability to the Owner for delay or damage caused the Owner because of such suspension of Init AIA Document B132TM— 2009 (formerly 8141 T CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 17 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and Is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) services. Before resuming services, the Architect shall be paid all sums due prior to suspension and any expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.2 If.the Owner suspends the Project, the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, the Architect shall not be compensated for expenses incurred-in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. § 9.3 If the Owner suspends the Project for more than 90 cumulative days for reasons other than the fault of the Architect, the Architect may terminate this Agreement by giving not less than seven days' written notice. § 9.4 Either party may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. § 9.5 The Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written notice to the Architect for the Owner's convenience and without cause. § 9.6 In the event of termination not the fault of the Architect, the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Section 9.7. § 9.7 Termination Expenses are in addition to compensation for the Architect's services and include expenses directly attributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated, plus an amount for the Architect's anticipated profit on the value of the services not performed by the Architect, up to a maximum of Two Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars ($2,000.00). § 9.8 The Owner's rights to use the Architect's Instruments of Service in the event of a termination of this Agreement are set forth in Article 7 and Section 11.9. ARTICLE 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 10.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located. § 10.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those in AIA Document A232 -2009, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. § 10.3 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their agents, successors, assigns and legal representatives to this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except that the Owner may assign this Agreement to a lender providing financing for the Project if the lender agrees to assume the Owner's rights and obligations under this Agreement. § 10.4 If the Owner requests the Architect to execute certificates, the proposed language of such certificates shall be submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to the requested dates of execution. If the Owner requests the Architect to execute consents reasonably required to facilitate assignment to a lender, the Architect shall execute all such consents that are consistent with this Agreement, provided the proposed consent is submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to execution. The Architect shall not be required to execute certificates or consents that would require knowledge, services or responsibilities beyond the scope of this Agreement. § 10.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the Owner or Architect. § 10.6 Unless otherwise required in this Agreement, the Architect shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous materials or toxic substances in any form at the Project site. § 10.7 The Architect shall have the right to include photographic or artistic representations of the design of the Project among the Architect's promotional and professional materials. The Architect shall be given reasonable access to the completed Project to make such representations. However, the Architect's materials shall not include the Owner's confidential or proprietary information if the Owner has previously advised the Architect in writing of the specific AIA Document B132TM — 2009 (formerly B141 mCMa — 1992). Copyright ®1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) information considered by the Owner to be confidential or proprietary. The Owner shall provide professional credit for the Architect in the Owner's promotional materials for the Project. (Paragraph deleted) ARTICLE 11 COMPENSATION § 11.1 For the Architect's Basic Services described under Article 3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of or basis for, compensation.) A stipulated sum of One Hundred Eighty Six Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars ($186,000.00) § 11.2 For Additional Services designated in Section 4. 1, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of or basis for, compensation. If necessary, list specific services to ivhich particular methods of compensation apply.) N/A § 11.3 For Additional Services that may arise during the course of the Project, including those under Section 4.3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amo:int of or basis for, compensation.) Hourly, per Architect's Hourly rates attached as Exhibit A, plus Reimbursable Expenses § 11.4 Compensation for Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when not included in Sections 11.2 or 11.3, shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus Fifteen percent ( 15 %) § 11.5 Where compensation for Basic Services is based on a stipulated sum or percentage of the Cost of the Work, the compensation for each phase of services shall be as follows: (Rote deleted) Design Development Phase Twenty Eight percent ( 28 %) Construction Documents Phase Thirty Eight percent ( 38 %) Bidding or Negotiation Phase Six percent ( 6 %) Construction Phase Twenty Seven percent ( 27 %) Eleven (11) month walk through One percent ( 1 %) Total Basic Compensation one hundred percent ( 100 %) The Owner acknowledges that with an accelerated Project delivery or multiple bid package process, the Architect may be providing its services in multiple Phases simultaneously. Therefore, the Architect shall be permitted to invoice monthly in proportion to services performed in each Phase of Services, as appropriate. § 11.6 When compensation is based on a percentage of the Cost of the Work and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for those portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on those portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 11.5 based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal, or (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent estimate of the Cost of the Work prepared by the Construction Manager for such portions of the Project. The Architect shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with this Agreement for all services performed whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. § 11.7 The hourly billing rates for services of the Architect and the Architect's consultants, if any, are set forth below. The rates shall be adjusted in accordance with the Architect's and Architect's consultants' normal review practices. (If applicable, attach an exhibit of hourly billing rates or insert them below.) See Attached Init AIA Document B1321" — 2009 (formerly B141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 19 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) (Table deleted) § 11.8 Compensation for Reimbursable Expenses § 11.8.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants directly related to the Project, as follows: .1 Transportation and authorized out -of -town travel and subsistence; .2 Long distance services, dedicated data and communication services, teleconferences, Project Web sites, and extranets; .3 Fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project; .4 Printing, reproductions, plots, standard form documents; .5 Postage, handling and delivery; .6 Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, if authorized in advance by the Owner; .7 Renderings, models, mock -ups, professional photography, and presentation materials requested by the Owner; .8 Architect's Consultant's expense of professional liability insurance dedicated exclusively to this Project, or the expense of additional insurance coverage or limits if the Owner requests such insurance in excess of that normally carried by the Architect's consultants; .9 All taxes levied on professional services and on reimbursable expenses; .10 Site office expenses; and .11 Other similar Project- related expenditures. § 11.8.2 For Reimbursable Expenses the compensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants plus Fifteen percent ( 15 %) of the expenses incurred. (Paragraphs deleted) § 11.10 Payments to the Architect (Paragraph deleted) § 11.10.2 Unless otherwise agreed, payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid Forty Five ( 45 ) days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Insert rate of monthly or annual interest agreed upon.) One percent ( I %) per month § 11.10.3 The Owner shall not withhold amounts from the Architect's compensation to impose a penalty or liquidated damages on the Architect, or to offset sums requested by or paid to contractors for the cost of changes in the Work unless the Architect agrees or has been found liable for the amounts in a binding dispute resolution proceeding. § 11.10.4 Records of Reimbursable Expenses, expenses pertaining to Additional Services, and services performed on the basis of hourly rates shall be available to the Owner at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Special terms and conditions that modify this Agreement are as follows: Schematic Design Services were carried out under a separate Proposal and Agreement dated June Fifteen, Two Thousand Twelve (6/15/2012), and services under this Agreement will be based on the designs established under this prior Proposal and Agreement. § 12.1 The Architect must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the Owner pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Architect pursuant to this Agreement. The Architect is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event the Architect receives a request to release, data, the Architect must immediately notify the Owner. The Owner will give the Architect instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Architect agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the Owner, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers AIA Document B132 TO — 2009 (formerly 8141 *MCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 2( Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) harmless from any claims resulting from Architect's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or unlawful use of protected data. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. § 12.2 Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.25, Subdivision 4a, the Architect must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Architect's receipt of payment from the Owner for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Architect must pay interest of one and one -half percent (1 -112%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred and Noll 00 Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) For an unpaid balance of less than One Hundred and No /100 Dollars ($100.00), the Architect shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Architect shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. ARTICLE 13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT § 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. 13.2 This Agreement is comprised of the following documents listed below: .1 AIA Document B132TM -2009, Standard Form Agreement Between Owner and Architect, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition AIA Document E201TM -2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: AIA Document E202T "1-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: Other documents: (List other documents, if any, including additional scopes of service forming part of the Agreement.) Exhibit "A" — Architect's Hourly Rates This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER (Signature) Scott Neal City Manager (Printed name and title) OWNER (Signature) James Hovland, Mayor (Printed name and title) ARCHITECT (Signature) Kathryn M. Wallace, AIA Principal (Printed name and title) AIA Document B132T" — 2009 (formerly B141 TIC Ma_ 1992). Copyright 01992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Init. WARNING: This AIA! Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® 21 Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. t This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705 -1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B 132"m — 2009 This Additions and Deletions Report, as defined on page 1 of the associated document, reproduces below all text the author has added to the standard form AIA document in order to complete it, as well as any text the author may have added to or deleted from the original AIA text. Added text is shown underlined. Deleted text is indicated with a horizontal line through the original AIA text. Note: This Additions and Deletions Report is provided for information purposes only and is not incorporated into or constitute any part of the associated AIA document. This Additions and Deletions Report and its associated document were generated simultaneously by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012. PAGE AGREEMENT made effective as of the Tenth day of September in the year 2012 City of Edina Parks & Recreation Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Telephone Number: 952- 927 -8861 Cuningham Group Architecture, Inc. 201 Main Street SE, Suite 325 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Telephone Number: 612- 379 -3400 Fax Number: 612 - 379 -4400 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 Design Development Through Construction Phase Services. RJM Construction 7003 West Lake Street, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Telephone Number: 952- 837 -8600 Fax Number: 952- 832 -9600 PAGE 2 Architect understands that the City intends to replace /rebuild the Braemar Golf Dome at 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 following a fire. We understand the Project will include the following listed elements. These are as described in: (i) the Schematic Design and additional professional services provided under the prior agreement with the Owner: And (ii) in Quote Package 1, Bid Package 1, and the Accessory Building Design Development sets by Cuningham Group, during drafting and finalization of this Proposal and Agreement (to be billed under this Agreement), together with the Estimate Summary dated 11/13/2012 prepared by City's Construction Manager Construction: Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B1321" — 2009 (formerly 8141 T "CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA* Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) 1. Replacement of the dome fabric and cables, with attachment to the same footings. Potential conversion to insulated membrane as an Alternate. Change to attachment of cables at roughly 50' section where it was connected to the building and where new footings will be required. 2. Replacement lights, by dome supplier. 3. Replacement and relocation of the standby mechanical unit that was in the building. Other units to remain. 4. Replacement of deck for second level driving stations with one of non - combustible construction. 5. New fire sprinkler system as required for full -year use of dome, including 'fire cannons' for full dome, and possibly also a fixed system over the driving deck. 6. New padded artificial turf over asphalt, from roughly 5' in front of the deck to the back of the air structure. 7. A replacement accessory building to include ent , /ry lobby, check -in counter, refreshments area, restrooms, office and mechanical room. 8. Underground utilities, to include underground infiltration chambers to handle stormwater run -off for disturbed areas, per Watershed requirements. 9. Repair and enlargement of the parking lot. Note: Scope does not include design of any demolition to the existing building or dome components; we understand the Owner's Construction Manager will perform that work. PAGE 3 Owner's program was developed under an earlier agreement and is reflected in the documents listed in 1.1 above. NA The Owner's budget is not finalized, but is eg nerally reflected in the Estimate Summary dated November Thirteen, Two Thousand Twelve, prepared by the City's Construction Manager. Phase I: Design and documentation to be complete by November Eighth, Two Thousand Twelve: Phase II: Design and documentation to be complete by January Two, Two Thousand Thirteen. To be determined: either January, Two Thousand Thirteen, or April, Two Thousand Thirteen Fall, Two Thousand Thirteen [ X ] Multiple Prime Contractors Two major bid packages and two major construction phases: to be finalized by January. Two Thousand Thirteen. PAGE 4 Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 TM —2009 (formerly B141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11129/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) N/A Todd Anderson, General Manager Braemar Golf Course 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, Minnesota 55439 N/A PAGE 5 1 Construction Manager: The Construction Manager is identified on the cover page. 1f a Gent-• etief h4anagei: has not been Feliained as efthe date efthis Agreement, siate the afitieipated date ef , None. Owner's Construction Manager will review all Project Cost Estimates. Previously Retained Previously Retained N/A N/A Kathryn M. Wallace, AIA, Principal Tunde Olusanya, Technical Support 201 Main Street SE, Suite 325 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Clark Engineering 621 Lilac Drive North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 -4609 Hallberg Engineering, Inc. 1750 Commerce Court Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132TM —2009 (formerly 8141 TM Ma — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 3 reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 Electrical Engineer: Hallberg Engineering Inc. 1750 Commerce Court White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 .4 Civil Engineer: Anderson - Johnson Associates, Inc. 7575 Golden Valley Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 PAGE 6 N/A N/A § 2.6.1 Comprehensive General Liability with policy limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 ) for each occurrence and in the aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. § 2.6.2 Automobile Liability covering owned and rented vehicles operated by the Architect with policy limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 1 combined single limit and aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. § 2.6.4 Workers' Compensation at statutory limits and Employers Liability with a policy limit of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1.000,000.00 ). § 2.6.5 Professional Liability covering the Architect's negligent acts, errors and omissions in its performance of professional services with policy limits of not less than One Million and No /100 Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 ) per claim and in the aggregate. PAGE § 3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described in Article 3 and include usual and customary civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in this Article 3 are Additional Services. § 3.2 Schematic Design Phase Services § 3.2.1 . Performed under prior agreement. Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132TM — 2009 (formerly B141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/0812012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) PAGE 8 PAGE 9 § 3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.3, the Architect's responsibility to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and terminates en !be @cc !he ;;ehite;,; issues 11be final C •'fl fer- Payment. at the end of the one year Contractor's Construction Warranty Period. Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132T■ — 2009 (formerly 8141 mCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA* Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705 1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. — User Notes: (1381517669) Y. . " • • • \ . • 9TH r ■ \ • ■ \ _ ■ ftrr-Trm F.91 M7.9 PAGE 8 PAGE 9 § 3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.3, the Architect's responsibility to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and terminates en !be @cc !he ;;ehite;,; issues 11be final C •'fl fer- Payment. at the end of the one year Contractor's Construction Warranty Period. Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132T■ — 2009 (formerly 8141 mCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA* Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705 1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. — User Notes: (1381517669) PAGE 10 § 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by ontractor, shall net and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The Mehiteet:'s Owner's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. PAGE 13 § 4.3.2 To avoid delay in the Construction Phase, the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services, notify the Owner with reasonable promptness, and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. If the Owner subsequently determines that all or parts of those services are not required, the Owner shall give written notice to the Architect, and the Owner shall have no further obligation to compensate the Architect for those services: .1 Two ( 2_) reviews of each Shop Drawing, Product Data item, sample and similar submittals of the Contractor .2 Twenty Four ( 2L) visits to the site by the Architect over the duration of the Project during construction .3 Two ( 2J inspections for any portion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents .4 Two ( L) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine final completion PAGE 16 § 7.2 The Owner shall be deemed the owner of The Instruments of Service, including the Drawings and Specifications, and shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including copyrights. Submission or distribution of Instruments of Service to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the reserved rights of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 TM — 2009 (formerly B141 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA* Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) PAGE 17 § 8.2.2 The Owner and Architect shall endeavor to resolve claims, disputes and other matters in question between them by mediation which, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise, shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Mediation Procedures in effect on the date of the Agreement. A request for mediation shall be made in writing, delivered to the other party to the Contract, and filed with the person or entity administering the mediation. The request may be made concurrently with the filing of a complaint or other appropriate demand for binding dispute resolution but in such event, mediation shall proceed in advance of binding dispute resolution proceedings, which shall be stayed pending mediation for a period of 60 days from the date of filing, unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the parties or court order. Wan aFbitfatien [ ] Arbitration pursuant to Section 8.3 of this AgFeefneRtAgggment. [ X ] Litigation in a court of competent jHFisdietieRjurisdiction. §— $3Afbilf2N9R § 8.3.1 if the howe the fef- binding dispute elaifa, dispute puties seleeted afbitfafien as fnethed reseltitien in this Agfeemea�� er. ether. Faaaer- in AgFeement questien wising eut ef eF related fe this subjeef s but Bet Feselved by, mutually s unless the paf4ies agfee ether-wise. A demand fer of bitFatien be in deliveFed Agreefnenf� § 8.3.1.1 shall made %Tking; to the ether pafty te this and filed with the person eF entity administeFing the aFbitFfttiefl-. A demand f8F aFbilffifien shall be than filing but ift ne made ne eaflier- eeHewFenfly YAth the ef a Feques4 fer- Fnediaiien, event shall k be made the deAe the institution legal afteF when ef eF equitable preeeedings based en the elaeffl, pur-peses, . § 8.3.3 The awafd rendeFed by the arbifFalleF(s) be final, be § 8.3.4 § 8.3.4.1 shall andjudgment may entered upeH it in aeeerdanee wi!h Consolidation OF joindeF BitheF at its sele diSeFefien, Pak)', may eenseiidate aH aFbitlFatieft eendueted tifider this Agreement with afly Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document 8132*" —2009 (formerly 8141 OCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11129/2012 under Order No.1 396 1 9 7 7 05 -1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) _ nsrees�reRrer�nrr NMIopr-rof.pIn PAGE 18 § 9.2 If the Owner suspends the Project, the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, the Architect shall not be compensated for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. ' sehedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.7 Termination Expenses are in addition to compensation for the Architect's services and include expenses directly attributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated, plus an amount for the Architect's anticipated profit on the value of the services not performed by the "fet-.Architect, up to a maximum of Two Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars ($2,000.00). § 10.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located. PAGE 19 "business prepr-idar-y," the reeeiviRg paFty shall keep sueh ififer-fHatien stfietly eenfidential and shall net diselese it fe A stipulated sum of One Hundred Eighty Six Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($186,000.00) N/A Hourly, per Architect's Hourly rates attached as Exhibit A, plus Reimbursable Expenses Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132TM — 2009 (formerly 8141 T"CMa — 1992). Copyright O 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 8 reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11129/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) § 11.4 Compensation for Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when not included in Sections 11.2 or 11.3, shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus pereent ( 9;), eF as ethe<,rise stated bele;T Fifteen percent( 15 %) t� evi Design Development Phase Twenty Eight percent ( 28 %) Construction Documents Phase Thirty Eight percent ( 38 %) Bidding or Negotiation Phase Six percent ( 6 %) Construction Phase Twenty Seven percent ( 27 %) Eleven (11) month walk through One percent 1 L-1 See Attached PAGE 20 § 11.8.2 For Reimbursable Expenses the compensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants plus Fifteen percent ( 15 %) of the expenses incurred. P, MMM- § 11.10.2 Unless otherwise agreed, payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid Forty Five (45 ) days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. One percent (1 %) per month Schematic Design Services were carried out under a separate Proposal and Agreement dated June Fifteen Two Thousand Twelve (6/15/2012), and services under this Agreement will be based on the designs established under this prior Proposal and Agreement. § 12.1 The Architect must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 as it applies to (1) all data provided by the Owner pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received stored used maintained, or disseminated by the Architect pursuant to this Agreement. The Architect is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Govemment Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13 08 as if Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B1132T" —2009 (formerly B141 TOCMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA* Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA* Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) it were a govemment entity. In the event the Architect receives a request to release, data. the Architect must immediately notify the Owner. The Owner will give the Architect instructions conceming the release of the data to the reguesting Dan before the data is released. Architect agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the Owner, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any Claims resulting from Architect's officers', agents', owners', partners'. employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and /or unlawful use of protected data. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. & 12.2 Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.25, Subdivision 4a, the Architect must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Architect's receipt of payment from the Owner for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Architect must Day interest of one and one -half percent (1 -1/2 %) per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penally payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred and No /100 Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten and No /100 Dollars 010.001 For an unpaid balance of less than One Hundred and No1100 Dollars ($100.00), the Architect shall pay the actual penally due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Architect shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attomev's fees, incurred in bringing the action. PAGE 21 Exhibit "A" — Architect's Hourly Rates Scott Neal .City Manager Kathryn M. Wallace, AIA Principal OWNER (Signature) James Hovland, Mayor (Printed name and title) Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132TM —2009 (formerly B14111CMa — 1992). Copyright ® 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIAO Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 10 reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/2912012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) Certification of Document's Authenticity AIA® Document D401 TM -2003 I, Kathryn M Wallace, AIA, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, that I created the attached final document simultaneously with its associated Additions and Deletions Report and this certification at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No. 1396197705_1 from AIA Contract Documents software and that in preparing the attached final document I made no changes to the original text of AIA® Document B 132TM —2009, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition, as published by the AIA in its software, other than those additions and deletions shown in the associated Additions and Deletions Report. (Signed) (Title) (Dated) AIA Document D401 rN — 2003. Copyright ® 1992 and 2003 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:31:51 on 11/29/2012 under Order No.1396197705_1 which expires on 12/08/2012, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1381517669) To: Mayor and Council From: Brian Olson, Director of Public Works EEO Date: 12/04/2012 Subject: Request For Purchase — Asphalt Paver Replacement Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 11/26/12 Company: Ziegler Cat Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Weiler Model: P385 Asphalt Paver oe,10 NUJ �0 lddd Agenda Item #: IVA The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: 12/25/2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $ 177,412.50 General Information: On 11/26/12 at 2 pm, we received one responsive bid based on the specifications. This would replace a Gilcrest Paver that was purchased and has been used since 1996 and was beyond its useful lifespan. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor & City Council From: Scott Denfeld Video Production Coordinator Date: Dec. 4, 2012 Subject: Request for Purchase — Mobile Production System Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Nov. 27, 2012 Company: Z Systems Amazon.com B &H Photo Video Recommended Quote or Bid: Z Systems General Information: A, En • ,��RPOIiE`��O • IBBB Agenda Item #: IV.I. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: N/A Amount of Quote or Bid: $24,407.21 $24,423.21 $24,553.79 To maintain high standards of video production and adapt to changing video production and broadcast technology, the Communications & Technology Services Department has planned through the 2012 Capital Improvement Plan for the purchase of a mobile production system (Project COM -10 -005). The proposal is for a NewTek Tricaster 455, a self - contained system that allows crews to produce live events in a broadcast - style format. Multiple cameras, inputs such as computers with PowerPoint presentations, as well as graphics and music can all be edited and broadcast live on location. Though staff had originally considered a Ross CrossOver mobile switcher system, the NewTek Tricaster was deemed a better fit for Edina Community Channel 16 because of its advanced keying and virtual set functions. Such a system will allow City staff to offer the same style of production on location that we currently offer in the Council Chambers, including the ability to record and edit on the fly. By significantly streamlining the process of video production while offering new capabilities, this will serve to enhance events such as the State of the Community, Town Hall -style events, concerts and other community events. It also offers us the ability to "key -on- the -fly," which allows staff to insert backgrounds via green screen, much the same way that news and weather organizations do. This is something that we do now in a much less efficient manner, costing additional staff hours. We are recommending the purchase be made through Z Systems because of their low bid and because they are a local company that provides product support. City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 .�/ ON LINEAR VIDED 7 y'�� •9GOroN ` Systems, inc. 3724 Oregon Avenue South m Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 s cy SYSTEMS 4Z Tel. 952 - 974 -3140 .fy�c Fax.: 952 - 974 -3141 11n0N . SALES 0. vvww.zsyst.com fueling creativity SOLD TO: City of Edina Jennifer Bennerotte 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Purchase Agreement DATE: 11/28/2012 QUOTE #: 24636 P.O. #: FOB: TERMS: Net 15 PROJECT: Try a TriCaster 455 Q4 '12 SHIP TO: City of Edina Scott Denfeld 4801 W. 50th Street Component, SD -SDI, SD Component, Y/C (BNC) or Composite Edina, MN 55424 NT- FG- 000017 -RO01 NewTek TriCastern 455 - includes Control Surface and additional Media 1 19,995.00 19,995.00T Drive • 4 simultaneous live video sources, in any combination of HD -SDI, HD Component, SD -SDI, SD Component, Y/C (BNC) or Composite connections and resolutions . 14 switcher channels • 5 channels for static graphics or watch folder • 24 HD live virtual sets, with multiple camera angles, real -time reflections, specular highlights, animated zoom and presets • Configurable for up to 8 output connections and 2 independent A/V output signals 2 x SDI (Program and AUX) 2 x Analog configurable for Component or Y/C (BNC) + Composite (Program and AUX) Multi- track, multi - format recording of up to 4 simultaneous channels via IsoCorderl technology HDMI output (Program) Network output for live streaming (Program) VIRTUAL SET EDITOR NT -FG- 000005 -RO01 NewTek TriCasterl Virtual Set Editor 2 (includes two licenses / 1 1 1,347.00 1,347.00T stand -alone and 1 TriCaster ) MONITOR BTL2150PJ Panasonic 21.5" HD /SD monitor w/ x 1080 resolution (LCD) Video: 1 1,410.00 1,410.00T BNC .x 1, Y /PB /PR: BNC x 3, SDI: BNC x 2, HDMI: HDMI (type.A) x 1 (HDCP supported, VIERA Link not supported), PC: D -SUB 15 pin x 1 Shipping (Shipping Charges Will Be Added To The Final Invoice) 1 0.00 O.00T I As an authorized representative of the organization listed above, I hereby order and agree . to purchase these products and /or services from Z Systems based on the terms and conditions . set forth.in this agreement and the attached or included 'Z SYSTEMS INC. Terms and Conditions Rev 3.14.08,' which can be found at www.zsyst.com /terms.pdf. All pricing quoted is subject to change / management approval at time of order entry/acceptance. Any returns, if accepted by our vendors, will be subject to a 20% restocking fee. SIGNATURE: Thanks for your interest in Z Systems Subtotal: Sales Tax: (7.275 %) TOTAL: $22,752.00 $1,655.21 $24,407.21 �IZ., ;POO 'T /R:C©M :NDATIOON To: City Council Agenda Item #: IV J From: Brian Olson, P.E. Director of Public Works Action Discussion ❑ Date: 12/4/2012 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2012 -23 Providing Fee For Alternative Water Meter Reading Program Action Requested: Adopt Ordinance No. 2012 -23 and request waive of 2nd reading of the attached Ordinance revision Information / Background: During the completion of our water meter replacement program, we have had requests from residents to install a metering device that does not transmit the readings via radio technology. Our current City Code (Section 1100.04) does not allow for the flexibility for Staff to approve this request. The attached revision to the City. Code, allows for the resident to request a meter that does not utilize the standard technology but also recognizes the increased cost and effort required to _manually read each of these meters. The program revision is modeled after the City of St. Paul water utility that offered two alternatives to the standard installation. Beyond our standard installation, our program will allow for a radio device affixed to the outside of the house at no cost to the resident and it will also allow a non -radio read technology device to be affixed to the outside of the house. Our recommendation is to add an additional $20 per quarter to the accounts that choose this option as we will be required to physically touch each household that exercises this option. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 "v REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2012-23 AMENDING SUBSECTION 1100.04 OF CITY CODE CONCERNING THE METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section I . Subparagraph A of Subdivision I of Subsection 1100.04 Meters; Meter Reading; Billing; Payment is amended to read as follows: A. All permanent service connections to the City water system shall be metered by a metering device and remote radio -meter reading device issued by the City. The metering device and remote radio meter reading device shall be installed by the owner of the property in accordance with Section 440 of this Code. A resident may request the installation of a metering device that requires a manual meter read. The fee for a manually read meter shall be as set forth in Section 185 Schedule A. Section 2. Effective Date: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage and publication according to law. First Reading: December 4, 2012 Second Reading: Waived Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL ow e H�v � �y Cn J88B Agenda Item #: IV. K. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -166 Setting Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees For 2013 Action Requested: Approve Resolution 2012 -166 Setting Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2013. Information / Background: Attached is Resolution 2012 -166 Setting Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2013. The fees that are proposed to change from 2012 to 2013 are in bold. Attachment: Resolution No. 2012 -166 Setting Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees For 2013. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 1 S i RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -166 SETTING AMBULANCE AND MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES FOR 2013 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and, set the,followirig ambulance service and miscellaneous fire fees for 2013. AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation to a medical facility: CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 2012 2013 Level 1- ON SCENE TREATMENT Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved ALS TREATMENT = NO TRANSPORT Admin. Of One or more medications with no transport $375.00 $380.00 Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) BASIC LIFE SUPPORT Vital Signs, - Splinting, Bandaging $830.00 $845.00 Level 3 - MODERATE CARE ALS -1 ALS Assessment, - 02, IV, Nitroglycerin Translingual Spray, ASA, Nitrous Oxide, 3 -12 Lead EKG,Monitoring, Spine Immobilization, Ultrasound, Glucose Monitoring, CO Monitoring, 02 Monitoring $1375.00 $1400.00 Level 4 - MAJOR CARE ALS-2 ALS Assessment and any of the following: 3:or more Medications Cardiac Pacing Cardioversion Defbrillation Intraosseous Infusions Surgical Airway Management Chest Decompression Endotracheal lntubation Central Venous Line, End -Tidal CO2 Monitoring - PCT-(inflated) Cardio /Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) - $1645.00 $1675.00 RESPONSE.TO SCENE AND NO TREATMENT OR TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED No Charge No Charge OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION Included in above Included in above CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 f. .I Resolution No. 2012 -166 Page Two MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $21.00 /mile $21.00 /mile ADDITIONAL STAFFING OR MECHANICAL EXTRICATION $610.00 /hour $620.00 $485.00 1 hour minimum 1 hour minimum VEHICLE DECONTAMINATION HazMat Unit* $710.00 $725.00 $840.00 $855.00 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES for 2013 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following miscellaneous fees for 2013: SPECIALIZED RESPONSE 2012 2013 Engine /Fire Company* $475.00 $485.00 Ladder Company* $630.00 $640.00 HazMat Unit* $710.00 $725.00 Special Operations Team* $895.00 $910.00 Limited Response* $240.00 $245.00 Gas Line Rupture Response* $420.00 $425.00 Specialized Equipment* Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost +-15% administrative charge Supplies or Additional Personnel Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Disposal Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Ambulance Standby* $215.00 $220.00 * Charges are per hour — one hour minimum Dated this 4th day of December, 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _ day of 120—. City Clerk o e H�v r1 �y To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director Action ❑ Discussion Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Review of 2013 operating budget and 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Plan Action Requested: Hold a public hearing for the proposed 2013 levy and budget and the 2013 -2017 CIP. Information / Background: On December 6, 2011, Council adopted the 2012 -2013 Budget, the first two -year budget for the organization. The rationale behind a two -year budget was to spend more time in the second year working on the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and less time making changes to the operating budget. The City has followed that plan during 2012, making relatively minor changes to the 2013 budget while implementing a new prioritization process for the CIP. Important dates for the 2013 Budget and CIP process were: • June 27, 2012 Executive Leadership Team (ELT) staff meeting was the official kickoff for staff level work on the process. • August 21, 2012 work session, Council and staff discussed the budget and CIP process and targets. • On September 4, 2012, Council adopted a preliminary tax levy. The increase was approximately 2.5% and was identical to the 2013 levies originally proposed in the 2012 -2013 Budget. • October 2, 2012 work session, Council and staff discussed the preliminary CIP & priority results. • December 4, 2012, Council holds a public hearing on the proposed 2013 budget and levy and 2013- 2017 CIP. • December 18, 2012, Council is required to adopt a final 2013 budget and levy. The final levy may be lower, but cannot be any higher than the preliminary levy adopted in September. Staff will recommend adoption of the 2013 -2017 CIP on this date as well, but there is no similar legal requirement that Council must act on. The proposed 2013 levy is identical to the 2013 levies originally proposed in the 2012 -2013 Budget; however, some of the other budget line items have changed due to changes that were not predicted when the 2012 -2013 Budget was originally adopted in late 2011. These changes may be due to changes in the economy or due to changes in operations that have been approved since late 2011. Examples of these changes include the concession stand at Braemar Arena, operational changes at Edinborough Park, a new City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund to account for a utility franchise fee, a staff reorganization and compensation study, and certain changes to the CIP that are reflected in the Construction fund budget or some of the Enterprise fund budgets. The proposed 2013 -2017 CIP includes standardized priority rankings for the first time in Edina for all projects other than equipment replacements funded through the Equipment Replacement Program. The priority ranking process started with division leaders and Department Heads ranking their own projects in July and early August. All submitted projects were reviewed by a staff CIP subcommittee. Members of the subcommittee included Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt, Finance Director John Wallin, City Manager Intern Ari Klugman, and Assistant Finance Director Eric Roggeman. The CIP subcommittee worked to standardize all of the Department Head rankings into a citywide ranking system. The CIP subcommittee considered various factors in their ranking, such as strategic goals set by Council, project descriptions, justifications, and Department Head rankings, and the type of project (repair, expansion, or new). Each project was given a priority ranking on a 7 point scale, with I representing "critical" projects and 7 representing "desirable" projects. The resulting priority rankings were then compared to available funding sources. What the CIP subcommittee found is that there were more project requests than available funding sources, particularly in the Construction Fund. The CIP subcommittee determined that projects with the highest priority rankings (1 -5) in the Construction Fund could be funded as submitted by Department Heads. Projects with priority rankings 6 -7 cannot be funded with currently available sources, so all of these projects were deferred until 2015, with the reasoning that prior to 2015 we will reprioritize the CIP again and all of those projects can be reconsidered at that time if appropriate. The resulting proposed 2013 -2017 CIP was previewed by the ELT on September 12, 2012. The ELT was given the opportunity to review and have their comments heard by the City Manager. On October 2, 2012, the CIP was discussed with Council at a work session. Council recommended a few changes that were incorporated into a revised CIP and distributed to Council on October 16, 2012. That version is essentially the same version attached here, with some editing improvements (grammar, spelling, etc.). The 2012 -2013 Budget and the proposed 2013 -2017 CIP are available on the Finance Department page of the City's website. Attachments: Proposed 2013 levy and budget Proposed 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Plan 676- • General Fund Levies General Operating Levy Equipment Levy NOTE ' General Fund Subtotal Debt Service"Fund, Levies City Hall Debt Service Equipment Certificates Gymnasium Debt Service Fire Station Debt Service Public Works Facility Debt Service Park Bond Market Value Levy Debt Service Fund Subtotal Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy NOTE ' Construction Fund Subtotal Total Property Tax Levy CITY OF-EDINA 2013 Levy and Budget Property Tax Levies - All Funds 2009 2010 2011 Budget 2012 2013 $ 20,193,052 $ 20,737,472 $ 21,004,000 $ 21,604,402 $ 21,989,994 1,009,639 - - - - 21,202,691 20,737,472 21,004,000 21,604,402 21,989,994 1.15% 1.79% 2.53% 1,040,436 1,039,561 949,850 9.50,800 949,850 84,191 164,010 164,010 67,500 - 180,000 381,793 396,444 411,644 396,444 457,950 454,591 431,544 432,744 431,544 588,453 1,172,802 1,232,460 1,178,202 1,536,743 600,212 602,250 615,837 610,862 615,837 2,951,242 3,815,007 3,790,145 3,651,752 3,930,418 - 940,494 992,072 992,072 992,072 - 940,494 992,072 992,072 992,072 $ 24,153,933 $ 25,492,973 $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 $ 26,912,484 General + Equipment Levy Increase 4.37% 2.24% 1.47% 2.73% 1.71% Debt Levy Increase (Decrease) 28.80% 29.27% -0.65% -3.65% 7.63% Total Property Tax Levy Increase 6.85% 5.54% 1.15% 1.79% 2.53% Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE 2 7.01% 5.68% 1.12% 1.86% 2.57% NOTE 1: Prior to 2010, the Equipment Replacement program was budgeted for in the General Fund. The Equipment Replacement program was moved to the Construction Fund for the 2.010 budget year, meaning the levy also had to be moved. NOTE 2: Tax capacity levies include the general fund,.city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station . and public works levies. The.Park Bond ;Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from this calculation, which results in different values. _1- CITY OF EDINA 2013 Levy and Budget Budget Summary - All Funds 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 25,122,113 $ 24,972,166 Reductions - - Net tax revenue 25,122,113 Tax increments 4,488,073 Special assessments 6,746,186 Franchise fees 692,288 Licenses and permits 2,410,314 Intergovernmental 4,068,378 Charges for services 3,014,894 Fines and forfeitures 1,203,767 Operating revenue 35,767,789 Investment income 680,409 Other revenue 881,624 Transfers 3,483,539 Debt issued 11,718,658 Other financing sources 160,903 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ FINANCING SOURCES $ 100,438,935 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION (110,000) General government $ 6,629,599 Public works 15,017,174 Public safety 17,767,915 Parks & recreation 4,214,897 Debt service 15,510,061 Utilities 11,119,053 Liquor 11,594,643 Aquatic center 751,767 Golf course 3,543,558 Community activity centers 4,401,887 Transfers 3,483,539 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, 4,088,545 EXPENSES AND OTHER 3,131,700 FINANCING USES $ 94,034,093 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE 91,913,842 Cost of goods sold $ 9,916,630 Personal services 27,073,939 Contractual services 13,942,772 Commodities 3,459,053 Central services 3,955,762 Equipment 1,244,480 Capital outlay 12,273,298 Depreciation 3,174,559 Debt service 15,510,061 Transfers 3,483,539 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET ASSETS 24,972,166 4,083,345 4,502,112 722,160 2,724,763 3,178,315 3,181,961 1,243,426 36,884,765 881,688 719,750 10,406,256 3,428,097 209,773 $ 97,138,577 $ 26,248,226 $ 26,912,484 (110,000) (113,000) 26,138,226 26,799,484 3,980,000 3,990,000 3,200,512 3,724,308 700,000 1,530,000 2,526,600 2,891,814 1,170,125 1,120,125 3,146,264 3,327,248 1,071,821 1,091,821 37,690,588 39,190,842 482,700 480,350 531,800 670,000 4,088,545 2,643,850 3,131,700 4,251,000 3,000 203,000 $ 87,861,881 $ 91,913,842 $ 6,419,019 $ 6,783,506 $ 7,050,521 17,754,398 11,595,886 14,308,729 15,773,221 16,372,434 16,511,739 4,331,572 4,889,768 4,781,512 6,758,068 7,844,476 6,670,685 12,130,685 13,306,188 13,804,880 11, 727,106 11,916,531 12,139,472 718,027 777,486 930,209 3,390,949 3,642,413 3,726,719 4,687,916 4,997,338 5,326,764 10,406,256 4,088,545 2,643,850 $ 94,097,217 $ 86,214,571 $ 87,895,080 $ 10,106,122 27,143,845 13,555,604 3,207,158 4,223,952 1,834,683 12,471,184 3,585,812 7,562,601 10,406,256 $ 10,154,149 29,306,990 14,891,962 3,655,903 4,450,668 1,797,309 5,530,925 3,635,099 8,703,021 4,088,545 $ 10,453,331 30,411,256 15,020,603 3,779,759 4,623,900 1,409,170 7,943,421 4,049,960 7,559,830 2,643,850 $ 94,034,093 $ 94,097,217 $ 86,214,571 $ 87,895,080 $ 6,404,842 $ 3,041,360 $ 1,647,310 $ 4,018,762 -2- • r� CITY OF EDINA 2013 Levy and Budget Combining Budget Summary - All Funds 2012 2013 3- Governmental Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER 26,912,484 (113,000) FINANCING SOURCES 26,799,484 26,799,484 Property tax levy $ 26,248,226 $ $ 26,248,226 Reductions (110,000) 1,530,000 (110,000) Net lax revenue 26,138,226 26,138,226 Tax increments 3,980,000 1,120,125 3,980,000 Special assessments 3,200,512 1,091,821 3,200,512 Franchise fees 700,000 39,190,842 700,000 Licenses and permits 2,526,600 480,350 2,526,600 Intergovernmental 1,060,125 110,000 1,170,125 Charges for services 3,146,264 - 3,146,264 Fines and forfeitures 1,071,821 - 1,071,821 Operating revenue 91,913,842 37,690,588 37,690,588 Investment income 300,700 182,000 482,700 Other revenue . 516,800 15,000 531,800 Transfers 2,993,545 1,095,000 4,088,545 Debt issued 3,131,700 - 3,131,700 Other financing sources 3,000 12,139,472 3,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER 930,209 930,209 FINANCING SOURCES $ 48,769,293 $ 39,092,588 $ 87,861,881 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER 1,203,750 1,440,100 FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION $ 50,526,936 $ 37,368,144 $ General government $ 6,783,506 $ $ 6,783,506 Public works 11,595,886 22,627,171 11,595,886 Public safety 16,372,434 9,499,016 16,372,434 Parks & recreation 4,889,768 3,779,759 4,889,768 Debt service 7,844,476 1,409,170 7,844,476 Utilities - 13,306,188 13,306,188 Liquor 4,049,960 11,916,531 11,916,531 Aquatic center 7,559,830 777,466 777,486 Golf course 3,642,413 3,642,413 Community activity centers - 4,997,338 4,997,338 Transfers 2,668,445 1,420,100 4,088,545 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 50,154,515 $ 36,060,056 $ 86,214,571 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER, FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ - $ 10,154,149 $ 10,154,149 Personal services 21,813,763 7,493,227 29,306,990 Contractual services 5,556,548 9,335,414 14,891,962 Commodities 1,673,097. 1,982,806 3,655,903 Central services 3,269,952 1,180,716 4,450,668 Equipment 1,797,309 - 1,797,309 Capital outlay 5,530,925 - 5,530,925 .Depreciation - 3,635,099 3,635,099 Debt service 7,844,476 858,545 8,703,021 Transfers 2,668,445 1,420,100 4,088,545 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER r FINANCING USES $ 50,154,515 $ 36,060,056 $ 86,214,571 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET ASSETS $ (1,385,222) $ 3,032,532 $ 1,647,310 3- Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total $ 2.6,912,484 $ $ 26,912,484 (113,000) (113,000) 26,799,484 26,799,484 3,990,000 3,990,000 3,724,308 3,724,308 1,530,000 1,530,000 2,891,814 2,891,814 1,010,125 110,000 1,120,125 3,327,248 3,327,248 1,091,821 1,091,821 39,190,842 39,190,842 310,600 169,750 480,350 655,000 15,000 670,000 1,574,450 1,069,400 2,643,850 4,251,000 - 4,251,000 203,000 203,000 $ 51,358,850 $ 40,554,992 $ 91,913,842 $ 7,050,521 $ - $ 7,050,521 14,308,729 14,308,729 16,511,739 16,511,739 4,781,512 4,781,512 6,670,685 - 6,670,685 - 13,804,880 13,804,880 12,139,472 12,139,472 930,209 930,209 3,726,719 3,726,719 - 5.326,764 5,326,764 1,203,750 1,440,100 2,643.850 $ 50,526,936 $ 37,368,144 $ 87,895,080 $ $ 10,453,331 $ 10,453,331 22,627,171 7,784,085 30,411,256 5,521,587 9,499,016 15,020,603 1,726,184 2,053,575 3,779,759 3,424,968 1,196,932 4,623,900 1,409,170 - 1,409,170 7,943,421 - 7.943,421 4,049,960 4,049,960 6,670,685 889,145 7,559,830 1,203,750 1,440,100 2,643,850 $ 50,526,936 $ 37,368,144 $ 67,895,080 $ 831,914 $ 3,166,646. $ 4,018,762 CITY OF EDINA 2013 Levy and Budget 2013 Governmental Fund Budgets -4- Braemar Ped & Debt General HRA CDBG Police SR Memorial Cycle Safety Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 21,989,994 $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,930,418 $ 992,072 $ 26,912,484 Reductions (113,000) (113,000) Net tax revenue 21,876,994 3,930,418 992,072 26,799,484 Tax increments - 3,990,000 - - 3,990,000 Special assessments - - 2,072,269 1,652,039 3,724,308 Franchise fees 730,000 - 800,000 - - 1,530,000 Licenses and permits 2,866,814 - - 25,000 2,891,814 Intergovernmental 760,000 145,365 104,760 - - 1,010,125 Charges for services 3,277,248 - - 50,000 3,327,248 Fines and forfeitures 1,034,000 - 57,821 - 1,091,821 Investment income - 169,000 600 300 30,000 110,700 310,600 Other revenue 655,000 - - - - 655,000 Transfers 600,000 559,350 415,100 1,574,450 Debt issued - - - - - 4,251,000 4,251,000 Other financing sources 3,000 200,000 203,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 31,800,056 $ 4,159,000 $ 145,365 $ 163,181 $ 3,300 $ 800,000 $ 6,592,037 $ 7,695,911 $ 51,358,850 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General government $ 5,703,900 $ 820,256 $ 145,365 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 381,000 $ 7,050,521 Public works 6,753,475 200,000 - - 800,000 6,555,254 14,308,729 Public safety 15,361,169 - 243,654 - 906,916 16,511,739 Parks & recreation 3,981,512 - 100,000 700,000 4,781,512 Debt service - - - 6,670,685 - 6,670,685 Transfers 559,350 644,400 1,203,750 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 31,800,056 $ 1,579,606 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 100,000 $ 800,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 9,187,570 $ 50,526,936 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $ 22,427,600 $ 109,256 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,315 $ 22,627,171 Contractual services 4,346,367 711,000 145,365 85,574 25,000 208,281 5,521,587 Commodities 1,682,529 - - 18,655 - - 25,000 1,726,184 Central services 3,343,560 - 80,004 1,404 3,424,968 Equipment - - - - 1,409,170 1,409,170 Capital outlay 200,000 139,425 75,000 719,996 6,809,000 7,943,421 Debt service - - - - 6,670,685 - 6,670,685 Transfers 559,350 644,400 1,203,750 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 31,800,056 $ 1,579,606 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 100,000 $ 800,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 9,187,570 $ 50,526,936 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ - $ 2,579,394 $ - $ (80,473) $ (96,700) $ - $ (78,648) $ (1,491,659) $ 831,914 -4- Utilities Liquor Fund Fund CITY OF EDINA 2013 Levy and Budget 2013 Enterprise Fund Budgets Aquatic Golf Center Course Arena Fund Fund Fund Art Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERSIN Operating revenues $16,819,093 $13,600,099 $ 944,000 $ 3,745,050 $ 1,630,400 $ 454,500 $ 1,239,700 $ 758,000 $39,190,842 Intergovernmental 110,000 - - 110,000 Investment income 98,000 - 33,250 38,500 169,750 Other revenue - 15,000 - 15,000 Transfers 270,000 330,000 202,800 266,600 1,069,400 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERSIN $17,027,093 $13,600,099 $ 944,000 $ 4,015,050 $ 1,960,400 $ 672,300 $ 1,539,550 $ 796,500 $40,554,992 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities $13,804,880 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $13,804,880 Liquor 12,139,472 12,139,472 Aquatic center - 930,209 980,209 Golf course - 3,726,719 3,726,719 Community activity centers - - - 2,102,277 709,888 1,557,280 957,319 5,326,764 Transfers 100,000 1,340,100 1,440,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,904,880 $13,479,572 $ 930,209 $ 3,726,719 $ 2,102,277 $ 709,888 $ 1,557,280 $ 957,319 $37,368,144 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ - $ 9,836,831 $ 39,200 $ 356,800 $ 76,500 $ 22,000 $ 105,000 $ 17,000 $10,453,331 Personal services 1,631,949 1,407,064 359,223 1,838,829 814,397 431,070 713,484 588,069 7,784,085 Contractual services 7,092,708 494,108 138,400 597,750 579,650 136,750 319,000 140,650 9,499,016 Commodities 1,056,250 65,525 113,050 383,900 87,750 57,000 187,700 102,400 2,653,575 Central services 630,348 215,484 19,236 141,840 42,660 40,068 57,096 52,200 1,198,932 Depreciation 2,600,000 120,460 250,000 404,500 420,000 23,000 175,000 57,000 4,049,960 Interest 793,625 - 11,100 3,100 81,320 - - 889,145 Transfers 100,000 1,340,100 1,440,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,904,880 $13,479,572 $ 930,209 $ 3,726,719 $ 2,102,277 $ 709,888 $ 1,557,280 $ 957,319 $37,368,144 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 3,122,213 $ 120,527 $ 13,791 $ 288,331 $ (141,877) $ (37,588) $ (17,730) $ (160,819) $ 3,186,848 -5- This page left blank intentionally. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2013 -2017 EDINA CITY COUNCIL Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember James Hovland Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Josh Sprague Ann Swenson � RA, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA �t TABLE OF CONTENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESCRIPTION PAGE INTRODUCTION • Organization 1 • Policy 2 • Process 2 • Priorities 3 • Financing 3 • Use of estimates 7 ,1iJ411JiIJ, /_l:VI • Construction Fund Balance 8 • Capital Improvement Plan Summary 9 DETAIL PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS • Administration — Liquor Store 17 • Community Development & HRA 25 • Engineering 29 • General Government Functions 60 • Park & Recreation 69 • Parks — Aquatic Center 89 • Parks — Arena 96 • Parks — Art Center 107 • Parks — Centennial Lakes Park 110 Parks — Edinborough Park 114 • Parks — Golf Course 134 • Public Safety Functions 142 • Public Works 151. This page left blank intentionally. , CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA �� `scetiz g �0 INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ORGANIZATION The City of Edina operates under a "Plan B" council- manager form of government. The City Council determines all matters of policy and appoints the City Manager. The City Manager is responsible for implementing policies and carrying out the business of City government. City services are provided by a staff that includes about 270 regular full -time employees, nearly 100 regular part-time employees and several hundred seasonal workers (mostly in parks and recreation programs). Many volunteers assist the staff. The customer service- oriented City is divided into the following departments and offices: Administration, Communications & Technology Services, Community Development, Engineering, Finance, Fire, Human Resources, Parks & Recreation, Police and Public Works. Staff work is guided by Edina Vision 20/20, the City's long -range strategic plan. According to Vision 20/20, the City's mission is to provide effective and valued services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. The City's vision is to be the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business distinguished by: • A livable environment • Effective and valued city services • A sound public infrastructure • A balance of land uses, and • Innovation Page 1 w�� CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o er � .ay INTRODUCTION i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) POLICY The goal of the City's CIP is to develop a comprehensive program for use by decision makers to guide capital investments based on an assessment of the community's needs, taking into account the best use of limited resources while providing efficient and effective municipal services. The City will develop a five -year plan for capital improvements and update it annually. The CIP process includes analyzing projects contributing to the public health and welfare, projects helping to maintain and improve the efficiency of the existing systems, and projects that define a future need within the community. The City will identify the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal in the CIP. Purchase contracts for equipment and projects included in the CIP must still be properly authorized according to the City's Purchasing Policy. The CIP will include equipment and projects from any City fund. Adopted by City Council February 20, 2007 Revisions: March 20, 2007 December 15, 2009 PROCESS The City implemented a two -year budget cycle process beginning with the 2012- 2013 operating budget. The objective is to take an alternating year approach to the operating budget and CIP processes. While both the operating budget and CIP will be reviewed every year, the majority of the planning, focus and effort will alternate between the two. During odd - numbered years, the City's focus will be on the operating budget. Extra efforts are dedicated to citizen engagement processes and a two -year operating budget, which will take effect on January 1 of the following even - numbered year. The CIP is reviewed but only updated if necessary. During even - numbered years, the City's focus will be on the CIP. Extra efforts are dedicated to reviewing the projects in the CIP and prioritizing them based on information available at the time. The operating budget is reviewed but only updated if necessary. Page 2 , CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o` e �v ` .o INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PRIORITIES While prioritization has always been part of the CIP process, the City implemented a formal process that standardizes, priorities across functions and departments, beginning with the 2013 -2017 CIP: The: prioritization process considers strategic goals and objectives, `which are set by the City Council and interpreted by City staff. The recommended CIP and priorities are then submitted back to the City Council for consideration, modification, and adoption. The City uses a 7 -point prioritization scale that is represented as follows: 1. Critical 2. 3. Significant 4. 5. Important 6. 7. Desirable The CIP prioritization process is completed once every two years, as described in the preceding "Process" section. Typically most higher - priority projects are scheduled to be completed in the first couple years of the CIP with the lower- priority projects scheduled later in the 5 -year CIP timeline. However, the City recognizes that circumstances and priorities can change over time and in some cases may cause the timing of some projects to be moved forward or back after adoption of the CIP. These changes are considered by the Council on a case -by -case basis. FINANCING Planning for capital improvements requires sound and economical financing. The City of Edina is able to utilize several financing mechanisms ranging_ from cash reserves to special - purpose funds as well as borrowing through bond sales. The exact financing method for each improvement is based on the =general = policies, jurisdictions and legal requirements: The final selection and. scheduling of proposed capital improvements is then based on the ability of the City to draw upon various funds. The total cost for each project includes construction costs, administration costs and interest. Page 3 ,aA, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA H I� �: { Q' .�y INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN In analyzing the financial viability of the capital improvements in the current plan, the following methods of financing were examined: 1. Construction Fund — This fund is designed to provide a funding source for capital improvements that otherwise would not have financing available. Revenues for this fund are derived from such sources as investment income and transfers from other funds. The City's Fund Balance Policy specifies that this is the preferred destination for any unassigned fund balance in the General Fund at the end of each year. Continuing this practice will provide money for high - priority projects to move forward. 2. Equipment Replacement Program — This program is designed to provide a funding source to replace all the equipment currently used by General Fund departments when it is time to be replaced. This revolving fund is replenished by a tax levy and allows the City to buy needed equipment without the additional costs of issuing debt. Equipment purchased under this program includes squad cars, fire trucks, plows, passenger cars and trucks, and even lawn mowers, among other items. 3. Enterprise Funds — The City's enterprise funds include Utilities, Liquor, Aquatic Center, Golf Course, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough Park, and Centennial Lakes. Capital Improvements and equipment purchased in the enterprise funds may be financed through revenues derived from user charges for the respective services, when available. When an enterprise fund does not have enough cash to pay for a specific project, the City may decide to use money from another source (usually the Construction Fund) or the City may decide to issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds. See below for further description of these financing methods. 4. Tax Increment (TIQ Funds — These funds are derived from tax increment districts including 50,n and France, Southeast Edina, Grandview, and 70th Street and Cahill Road. In tax increment districts, property owners pay ad valorem taxes at the full rate levied by the units of local government within the taxing jurisdiction. Page 4 o` e ti H, `sub O CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN At the time the tax increment district is created, property values are "frozen ". The units of local government receive taxes based on the frozen property values. Any additional taxes paid by property owners based on the increase in property, values since the district was created is known as the "increment ". The increment revenue is then used to finance physical improvements within the district. 5. Pedestrian Bike Safety Fund — The City, is considering setting up a new fund for 2013 that would collect money from a utility franchise fee to be used .for projects that promote pedestrian and bike safety. 6. Special Assessments — Special assessments are based on the concept that when land is benefited from a particular improvement, all or part of the costs of the improvement should be levied against those properties to finance such improvements. Since it often takes several years for the City to collect special assessments, the City may decide to. issue bonds for cash flow purposes. See Public Improvement Revolving Bonds for further description of this financing tool. 7. Municipal State�Aid (MSA) — The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) provides :funding assistance for improvements to those municipal streets which are rdesignated as part of its MSA system. Money for this fund is supplied with a dedicated portion of revenues collected from road use and gasoline taxes. Funds are released for improvements on those streets on the system whose design and construction meet MSA standards. Funds may be expended for any street on the MSA system at any time, and MSA funds may be accumulated over several years. 8. Grants and Donations — The City sometimes receives external sources of financing including .grants an nd donations from the Federal, State, and other local governments. We also may receive donations from local residents, businesses or community organizations. Minnesota Statute 465.03' allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens provided the City Council authorizes such acceptance via resolution adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. Page 6 A, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA O~ a tf � ? 0, �` .ay INTRODUCTION r" M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 9. Bonds — The City may decide to sell bonds to pay the upfront costs of a project when cash on hand is not sufficient for a project. There are many different bond programs that the City uses, each with slightly different names. A few of the programs the City uses most often are listed below. • Enterprise Revenue Bonds — Most of the Enterprise Revenue Bonds that the City issues pay for Utility Fund project costs, but the City may issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds for any of our enterprises. These bonds are designed to be repaid with revenues from the enterprise facilities that benefit from the projects financed, therefore no levy is required. • Tax Increment Bonds — The City has previously issued Tax Increment bonds to pay TIF project costs. The bonds are repaid with the tax increment revenue that is generated by the district; therefore no additional levy is required. • Public Project Lease Revenue Bonds — These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City through an annual appropriation. • Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds — PIR bonds are generally issued for street improvement projects and are repaid with special assessment receipts over a ten -year period. These bonds are supported through special assessments, therefore no levy is required. • General Obligation (GO) — There are several types of GO debt available for the City to use. Although no new issues are included in this plan, the City currently has park & recreation bonds and equipment certificates outstanding. Both of these types of GO debt require a levy. Page 6 w°Sil� CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA el �+ O v INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Current $100,000. $90,000 DEnterprise Revenue $80,000 OTax Increment $70 000 $60,000 oPublic Imp Revolving $50,000 $40,000, a Public Project $30,000 ■General Obligation $20,000 $10,000 $- City of Edina Debt and Projected (In Thousands) r #' 3 i i 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 This chart shows the projected effect on the City as a whole if future debt is issued according to this capital improvement plan. The General Obligation bonds category shown here includes Capital Improvement bonds, park and recreation bonds and equipment certificates ESTIMATES The preparation of a 5 year CIP requires City staff to make material estimates about project scope, costs of labor and materials, future interest rates and other items. Many times these estimates come from staff experience, projections published in other sources, vendor estimates, or a combination of several sources. Generally the estimates for earlier years are more precise than later years. Actual results could differ from such estimates. Page 7 A . , CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o` e . r 0 CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Projected Construction Fund Unreserved Fund Balance Estimate Budget Forecast 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Revenues Property taxes $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 Special Assessment 1,723,765 1,652,039 1,237,872 1,361,088 1,344,038 1,259,338 License and permits 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Intergovernmental 50,000 200,000 2,680,000 880,000 1,050,000 1,260,000 Charges for service 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Interest (1.5 %) 151,600 110,700 88,300 62,900 (4,100) (33,000) Total Revenues 2,992,437 3,029,811 5,073,244 3,371,060 3,457,010 3,553,410 Expenditures General Government 259,500 381,000 396,900 1,368,900 587,900 255,000 Park & Rec 997,500 700,000 333,000 1,742,325 983,255 931,600 Public Safety 1,041,809 906,916 1,361,845 721,925 284,760 70,000 Public Works 7,454,236 6,555,254 7,385,395 6,443,842 6,918,420 6,511,415 Total Expenditures 9,753,045 8,543,170 9,477,140 10,276,992 8,774,335 7,768,015 Other Financing Sources /(Uses) Transfers In/(Out) 822,395 (229,300) (205,500) (1,181,600) (273,400) (1,524,600) PIR Bonds 3,131,700 4,251,000 2,917,200 3,619,200 3,662,100 3,361,800 Total Other Sources 3,954,095 4,021,700 2,711,700 2,437,600 3,388,700 1,837,200 Increase (Decrease) $(2,806,513) $(1,491,659) $(1,692,196) $(4,468,332) $(1,928,625) $(2,377,405) Beginning Balance $10,186,483 $ 7,379,970 $ 5,888,311 $ 4,196,115 $ (272,217) $(2,200,842) Endina Balance $ 7.379.970 $ 5.888.311 $ 4.196.115 $ (272.2171 $ (2.200.8421 $ (4.578.247) The charts above show the projected impact this CIP will have on the Construction Fund along with a five -year history of Construction Fund balances. The current plan is affordable for 2013 -2014, after that the projection shows the Construction Fund balance turning negative sometime during 2015. The City intends to reassess and reprioritize during the next CIP planning process scheduled to occur in fall 2014 and issue a new CIP for the years 2015 -2019. Page 8 City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total lAdministration - Liquor Stores 50th: Store Remodel LIQ -02 -005 1 150,000 150,000 York: Replace Rooftop HVAC LIQ -10 -004 2 40,000 40,000 Vernon: Replace Load Leveler Dock LIQ -10 -006 5 15,000 15,000 All Stores: Video & Software Upgrades LIQ -11 -004 5 60,000 60,000 Vernon: Replace Rooftop HVAC LIQ -11 -005 5 25,000 25,000 Vernon: Replace Entrance & Exit Doors 1-I0-11 -006 5 30,000 30,000 Vernon Tasting Area LIQ -13 -001 5 25,000 25,000 Liquor Signage- InteriorlExterior LIQ -13 -002 3 80,000 80,000 Administration - Liquor Stores Total 230,000 65,000 130,000 425,000 Liquor Fund 230,000 65,000 130,000 425,000 Administration - Liquor Stores Total 230,000 65,000 130,000 425,000 Community Development & HRA Promenade Phase III HRA -11 -002 5 2,000,000 2,000,000 France Ave and TH62 Reconstruction HRA -11 -003 1 600,000 600,000 Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study HRA -13 -001 2 200,000 200,000 Pedestrian Bridge over TH62 HRA -13 -002 1 3,000,000 3,000,000 Community Development & HRA Total 200,000 5,600,000 5,800,000 Tax Increment Funds 200,000 5,600,000 5,800,000 Community Development &HRA Total 200,000 5,600,000 5,800,000 Engineering Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Program ENG -13 -001 1 5,300,000 3,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,100,000 21,900,000 Water Main Improvments ENG -13 -002 1 1,375,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 8,375,000 Sanitary Sewer Main Improvements ENG -13 -003 1 1,451,000 690,000 931,000 700,000 1,100,000 4,872,000 Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements ENG -13 -004 1 1,200,000 2,200,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 11,200,000 Piping Wells #15 and #9 to Treatment Plant No. 6 ENG -13 -005 4 1,100,000 1,100,000 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety Projects ENG -13 -006 2 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000 Bridge Rehabilitation: 78th St W and Gus Young Ln ENG -13 -007 1 150,000 150,000 Reconstruct: 2nd Street South ENG -13 -008 1 150,000 150,000 Reconstruct: Valley View Road ENG -13 -009 4 100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 PROPOSED Page 9 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Department Project# Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Reconstruct Tracy Avenue ENG -13 -010 5 100,000 200,000 1,100,000 1,300,000 2013 -2014 Flood Protection and Water Improvements ENG -13 -011 4 30,000 35,000 250,000 315,000 2014 -2015 Flood Protection and Water Improvements ENG -13 -012 4 50,000 275,000 45,000 325,000 2015 -2016 Flood Protection and Water Improvements ENG -13 -013 5 50,000 275,000 325,000 Momingside Neighborhood Water Main Relining ENG -13 -014 5 Pedestrian Bike Safety Fund 200,000 100,000 300,000 Mill and Overlay: Benton Avenue ENG -13 -015 5 5,200,000 Special Assessments 450,000 450,000 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan ENG -13 -016 5 4,240,000 22,465,000 45,000 45,000 Stone Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENG -13 -017 4 45,000 1,120,000 6,617,000 Utility Fund - Storm 45,000 NMWD Petition Projects - Phase 1 ENG -13 -018 4 3,400,000 180,000 140,000 12,925,000 320,000 Engineering Department Equipment Replacement ENG -13 -019 n/a 41,000 2,260,000 45,000 25,000 28,000 139,000 Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 4 11,557,000 13,735,000 13,296,000 450,000 450,000 Reconstruct W 54th St (Wooddale to France) PW -01 -012 1 150,000 950,000 1,100,000 Reconstruct W 58th St (Wooddale to France) PW-04 -001 4 150,000 950,000 1,100,000 Bridge: 54th Street Bridge PW -05 -003 1 180,000 820,000 75,000 75,000 1,000,000 Mill & Overlay: Olinger Blvd (Vernon - Tracy) PW -05 -006 4 COMA 3-002 800,000 800,000 Remove Lift Station No. 1 UT -03 -010 3 150,000 COM -13 -003 n/a 186,000 150,000 New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) UT -07 -002 4 150,000 Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 7,000,000 7,150,000 Piping Wells #5 and #18 to WTP #5 UT -08 -008 1 100,000 375,000 Electronic Document Management GG -11 -004 100,000 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining UT -08 -014 5 540,000 600,000 155,000 Assessing Division Equipment Replacement 1,140,000 W 69th Street and York Ave Water Main Loop UT -10 -011 5 30,000 150,000 30,000 150,000 Asset Management Update UT -12 -008 4 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 225,000 Cooper Circle Pond Outlet UT -12 -009 5 80,000 80,000 Engineering Total 11,887,000 13,505,000 13,396,000 13,060,000 19,208,000 71,056,000 Bonds - Public Improvement Revolving Bonds 150,000 100,000 50,000 70,000 370,000 Construction Fund 120,000 120,000 Equipment Replacement Program 41,000 45,000 25,000 28,000 139,000 Municipal State Aid 2,580,000 880,000 1,050,000 1,260,000 5,770,000 Pedestrian Bike Safety Fund 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000 Special Assessments 5,300,000 3,640,000 4,640,000 4,645,000 4,240,000 22,465,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 2,166,000 1,470,000 971,000 890,000 1,120,000 6,617,000 Utility Fund - Storm 1,330,000 2,495,000 3,400,000 3,000,000 2,700,000 12,925,000 Utility Fund - Water 1,650,000 2,350,000 2,260,000 2,350,000 8,840,000 17,450,000 Engineering Total 11,557,000 13,735,000 13,296,000 13,110,000 19,358,000 71,056,000 General Government Function� City of Edina Wireless Network COM -13 -001 3 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Gateway Signs COMA 3-002 7 935,000 380,000 1,315,000 Communications and IT Equipment Replacement COM -13 -003 n/a 186,000 136,900 53,900 32,900 80,000 489,700 Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 6 225,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Electronic Document Management GG -11 -004 5 65,000 65,000 25,000 155,000 Assessing Division Equipment Replacement GG -13 -001 n/a 30,000 30,000 PROPOSED Page 10 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Department Project# Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Election Equipment Replacement GG -13 -002 n/a 30,000 30,000 HRIS/Payroll HR -13 -001 2 50,000 150,000 200,000 General Government Functions Total 376,000 426,900 1,343,900 562,900 260,000 2,969,700 Construction Fund 140,000 200,000 1,260,000 530,000 150,000 2,280,000 Equipment Replacement Program 186,000 171,900 83,900 32,900 110,000 584,700 Other - 2010 Unassigned Fund Balance 50,000 55,000 105,000 General Government Functions Total 376,000 426,900 1,343,900 562,900 260,000 2,969,700 Park & Recreation 100,000 1,650,000 800,000 850,000 3,830,000 Equipment Replacement Program 20,000 Pamela Park: Renovate senior athletic field PK -00 -033 7 100,000 Pamela Park: New athletic field PK -07 -004 6 4,440,180 Lewis Park: Pathway lighting PK -08 -006 5 30,000 Pamela Park: South Parking Lot Expansion PK -10 -005 6 Pamela Park: North Parking Lot Expansion PK -10 -006 6 Pamela Park: West Parking Lot Expansion PK -10 -007 6 Bredesen Park: Comfort Station Renovation PK -11 -006 5 75,000 Normandale Park: Replace Warming House/Shelter PK -11 -007 6 VanValkenburg Park construction PK -12 -002 7 Parks Department Equipment Replacement PK -13 -001 n/a 20,000 Utley Park: Bathrooms Renovation PK -13 -002 1 80,000 Lake Edina Park: Pathway PK -13 -003 5 85,000 Highlands Park: Basketball Court PK -13 -004 7 Garden Park: Baseball Field PK -13 -005 5 300,000 Wooddale Park: Playground Equipment PK -13 -006 5 Weber Park: Playground Equipment PK -13 -007 5 Arden Park: Replace Shelter Building PK -13 -008 5 Strachauer Park: Playground Equipment PK -13 -009 5 Parks Comprehensive Master Plan PK -13 -010 7 Park Planning and Design PK -13 -011 n/a 60,000 330,000 400,000 40,000 45,000 60,000 650,000 600,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 25,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 31,600 200,000 650,000 330,000 400,000 30,000 40,000 45,000 60,000 75,000 650,000 600,000 310,180 80,000 85,000 25,000 300,000 200,000 200,000 650,000 200,000 100,000 60,000 Park & Recreation Total 650,000 283,000 1,692,325 933,255 881,600 4,440,180 Construction Fund 430,000 100,000 1,650,000 800,000 850,000 3,830,000 Equipment Replacement Program 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 31,600 310,180 Grants & Donations 200,000 100,000 300,000 Park & Recreation Total 650,000 283,000 1,692,325 933,255 881,600 4,440,180 Parks - Aquatic Center Replace Heaters AQC -12 -002 1 40,000 40,000 Pool Deck Repairs AQC -12 -003 2 50,000 50,000 Bathhouse Roof and Other Improvements AQC -12 -004 2 52,000 52,000 PROPOSED Page I I Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Department Project#. Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Replace Pool Filters AQC -12 -005 4 170,000 165,000 62,000. 855,000 62,000 SCS Play Structure AQC -12 -006 5 170,000 165,000 160,000 135,000 225,000 325,000 325,000 Main Pool Boiler AQC -13 -001 1 47,000 160,000 135,000 225,000 855,000_ - 47,000 Large Slide AQC -13 -002 5 500,000 Parks - Art Center 500,000 Parks - Aquatic Center Total 87,000 102,000 62,000 -500,000- 325,000 1,076,000 Aquatic Center Fund 87,000 102,000 62,000 500;000 325;000 1,076,000 i Parks - Aquatic Center Total 87,000 102,000 62,000 500,000 325,000 1,076,000 Parks - Arena Water System Repairs A -10 -003 5 80,000 80,000 Replace Zamboni A -12 -001 3 140,000 140,000 Make -up Water.Tanks A -12 -002 1 35,000 35,000 Low E Ceiling Replacement - West Arena A -13 -001 4 75,000 75,000 Painting East Arena A -13 -002 4 25,000 25,000 Ballet Room Remodel A -13 -003 3 25,000 25,000 Low E Ceiling Replacement - East Arena A -13 -004 5 80,000 80,000 Bathroom/Locker Room Upgrades/Remodel A -13 -005 5 100,000 100,000 Rubber Floor Replacement A -13 -006 5 35,000 35,000 Arena Roof A -13 -007 5 225,000 225,000 Parking Lot Resurfacing A -13 -008 2 35,000 35,000 Construction Fund 37,800 85,000 122,800 Parks - Art Center Total 37,800 85,000 122,800 Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Replace HVAC Units CL -06 -005 2 25,000 25,000 Replace Park Sound System CLa -008 7 32,000 32,000 Replace HVAC Units CL -12 -001 5 25,000 25,000 One -Ton Truck CL -13 -001 5 28,000 28,000 PROPOSED Page 12 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Parks - Arena Total 170,000 165,000 160,000 135;000 225;000 855,000 Construction Fund 170,000 165,000 160,000 135,000 225,000 855,000 Parks -Arena Total 170,000 165,000 160,000 135,000 225,000 855,000_ Parks - Art Center Parking Lot Expansion ART -11 -004 7 85,000 85,000 HVAC ART -11 -005 3 22,800 22,800 MaxSolutions Enterprise Acquisition ART -13 -001 2 15,000 15,000 Parks - Art Center Total 37,800 85,000 122,800 Construction Fund 37,800 85,000 122,800 Parks - Art Center Total 37,800 85,000 122,800 Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Replace HVAC Units CL -06 -005 2 25,000 25,000 Replace Park Sound System CLa -008 7 32,000 32,000 Replace HVAC Units CL -12 -001 5 25,000 25,000 One -Ton Truck CL -13 -001 5 28,000 28,000 PROPOSED Page 12 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Department Project# Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 71,800 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 5 Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Total 43,100 43,100 25,000 32,000 25,000 28,000 110,000 189,500 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 3 42,000 110,000 I Construction Fund 25,000 32,000 25,000 28,000 Parks - Centemual Lakes Park Total 25,000 32,000 25,000 28,000 110;000 Parks - Edinborough Park Replaster Pool EP -00 -017 3 71,800 71,800 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 5 43,100 43,100 Pool and Wall Tile EP -08 -021 3 189,500 189,500 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 3 42,000 42,000 Track Floor EP -09 -015 7 65,000 65,000 Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 4 153,800 153,800 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 3 26,000 26,000 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 5 32,300 32,300 Track Air Conditioning EP -11 -005 7 66,600 66,600 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP -11 -006 3 26,300 26,300 Exterior Entryway Doors EP -11 -007 5 90,500 90,500 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 5 67,900 67,900 Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 6 30,800 30,800 Adventure Peak Renovation EP -11 -010 5 33,100 33,100 Park Boiler EP -12 -003 5 26,900 26,900 POS System EP -13 -001 5 28,300 28,300 Ramp to Track EP -13 -002 5 41,000 41,000 Provide Larger Locker Rooms EP -13 -003 1 582,000 582,000 Window Washing EP -13 -004 3 26,300 26,300 Roof Repairs EP -13 -005 5 110,400 110,400 Parks - Edinborough Park Total 266,600 892,100 264,700 143,500 186,700 1,753,600 I Construction Fund 266,600 120,600 264,700 143,500 -186,700 982,100 Edinborough Fund 771,500 771,500 j Parks - Edinborough Park Total 266,600 892,100 264,700 143,500 186,700 1,753,600 Parks - Golf Course Driving Range Expansion GC -12 -005 7 75,000 925,000 1,000,000 Braemar. Carpeting GC -12 -006 7 25,000 25,000 Braemar. Slit Drainage 3 Fairways GC -12 -007 7 50,000 50,000 Braemar. Clubhouse Roof Replacement GC -12 -008 5 80,000 80,000 160,000 Cart Path Repair/Expansion GC -12 -009 3 25,000 25,000 75,000 75,000 200,000 Maintenance Equipment Replacement GC -13 -001 5 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 615,000 Tee Renovation GC -13 -003 4 50,000 70,000 100,000 220,000 Irrigation System Replacement Phase 1 GC -13 -004 5 1,500,000 1,500,000 PROPOSED Page 13 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Department Project# Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Parks - Golf Course Total 245,000 310,000 1,330,000 385,000 1,500,000 3,770,000 Construction Fund 170,000 310,000 1,055,000 385,000 1,500,000 3,420,000 Grants & Donations - Braemar Memorial Fund 75,000 275,000 350,000 Parks - Golf Course Total 245,000 310,000 1,330,000 385,000 1,500,000 3,770,000 PS -12 -008 5 40,000 Public Safety Functions Police to Community Software PS -11 -005 3 25,000 25,000 PD Alarm Billing Software PS -12 -007 3 50,000 50,000 PD License Plate Reader PS -12 -008 5 40,000 40,000 Fire Department Equipment Replacement PS -13 -001 n/a 475,000 154,000 273,000 165,000 95,000 1,162,000 Police Department Equipment Replacement PS -13 -002 n/a 251,916 923,345 448,925 24,760 10,000 1,658,946 Inspections Division Equipment Replacement PS -13 -003 n/a 15,000 18,000 60,000 93,000 Health Division Equipment Replacement PS-13 -004 n/a 16,500 16,500 FD Plan Review Software PS -13 -005 3 250,000 250,000 CityWorks Code Enforcement Software PS -13 -006 3 50,000 50,000 Public Safety Functions Total 906,916 1,361,845 721,925 189,760 165,000 3,345,446 Construction Fund 165,000 250,000 415,000 Equipment Replacement Program 741,916 1,111,845 721,925 284,760 70,000 2,930,446 Public Safety Functions Total 906,916 1,361,845 721,925 284,760 70,000 3,345,446 Public Works Public Works: Braemar Cold Storage: Improvements PW -02 -006 7 50,000 50,000 Braemar Cold Storage - Fire Suppression PW -08 -004 3 70,000 70,000 GPS Electrical System PW -11 -006 7 30,000 30,000 Industrial Park Lighting PW -13 -001 3 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 416,000 Bridge Repairs PW -13 -002 1 100,000 170,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 570,000 Parking Ramp Repairs PW -13 -003 3 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 Public Works Equipment Replacement PW -13 -004 We 390,254 511,395 314,842 664,420 563,415 2,444,326 Utilities Equipment Replacement PW -13 -005 3 260,000 237,000 465,000 270,000 80,000 1,312,000 Well #13 Rehab Project PW -13 -006 5 120,000 120,000 Well #17 Rehab Project PW -13 -007 5 120,000 120,000 Well #6 Rehab Project PW -13 -008 5 120,000 120,000 Well #5 (West 69th Street) UT -08 -009 4 120,000 120,000 Well # 2 Rehab Project UT -09 -010 1 120,000 120,000 Water Meter Replacement Project UT -10 -006 1 2,100,000 2,100,000 Well #9 Rehab Project UT -10 -008 1 200,000 200,000 Well # 11 Rehab Project UT -10 -009 3 120,000 120,000 Well #10 Rehab Project UT -11 -006 4 120,000 120,000 Stone Water Lift Station #3 Rehab UT -11 -007 1 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 14 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Department Project# Priority 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Sewer Camera and Cable Reel UT -11 -008 3 40,000 40,000 Well No. 8 UT -12 -006 4 35,000 35,000 SCADA Radio System Upgrade UT -12 -007 4 60,000 60,000 Public Works Total 3,509,254 1,372,395 1,213,842 1,528,420 863,415 8,487,326 ~Construction'Fund = 304,000 x304,000 :314,000 ' - V 234;000 100 000 = ' 1256,000 Equipment Replacement Program 390,254 51;1,395 :314 842 664;420 563 415 T2 444,32 6 Utility °Fund.- "Sewer J73,000 440,600. 104;000 - 40000 >. 757;000 'Utility "Fund —Storm '° 103,060 `397,000. L 63,000 563,000 Utility Fund -Water 2,539,000 160,000, 145,000 _463,000 .: .160,000 ` 3,467,000 Public Works >Torcil 3,509,254 1;372,395 `1',213;842 ',.. „1,528,420 . ;863,415;, : , ;8,487326 Grand Total 18,565,570 24,108,240 20,431,692 17,462,835 23,642,715 104,211,052 PROPOSED Page 15 Tuesday,, October 16 2012 This page left bank intentionally. Page 16 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# LIQ -02 -005 Project Name 50th: Store Remodel 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration - Liquor Stores Useful Life Unassigned Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Remodel interior of 50th liquor store to bring it up to date with current stores. Last remodeled in 1998. Carpet and liquor shelves are in need of replacement. Lighting needs to be redone to fit needs of current layout. Employee bathroom needs updating. Justification - Remodeling the 50th liquor store reflects the Vision 20/20 plan, objective #3, in providing capital investment in public facilities. By remodeling we will align our Edina liquor brand to be more consistent with other stores. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 30,000 30,000 Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 EquipNehicles /Fumishings 20,000 20,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 PROPOSED Page 17 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -10 -004 Project Name York: Replace Rooftop HVAC 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration - Liquor Stores Useful Life 20 years Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 2 Status Active Description Replace 2 rooftop 14VAC units on the York store. Current units were installed in 1996 and have reached their useful life, which is 15 -20 years. New units are more energy efficient and will save on utility expenses right away. Justification By replacing the HVAC units we are aligning the liquor store with the city work plan in promoting environmental health by increasing energy efficiency and working to keep the City of Edina a Green Step city. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 PROPOSED Page 18 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project LIQ- 107006 Project Name Vernon: Replace Load Leveler Dock 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration -Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace mechanical leveling dock due to age. Current dock was built in 2001 and repairs are starting to happen on a more regular basis. Justification 3y replacing dock it allows us to be more efficient in our jobs with less down -time with deliveries due to repairs. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 15,000 15,000 Total Funding Sources 15,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 15,000 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000. 15,000 PROPOSED Page 19 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -11 -004 Project Name All Stores: Video & Software Upgrades 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration - Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Equipment Priority 5Important Status Active Description iteplace all video equipment with newer IP type technology. Most current equipment will be going on 10 years old. Newer technology will allow for better imaging and better access by liquor management and police. Justification Will allow us to better track the day to day activities of the stores and it will align us with other departments within the city using the same echnology. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 60,000 60,000 Total Funding Sources 60,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 60,000 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 PROPOSED Page 20 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -11 -005 Project Name Vernon: Replace Rooftop HVAC 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration - Liquor Stores Useful Life 20 years Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace rooftop HVAC at Vernon store. It will be going on 15 years and is reaching end of life before costly repairs. Justification Replacing the-HVAC unit will save us energy and money with a more efficient unit. It shows the community that we are environmentally responsible in having our buildings and equipment run at peak performance. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total Funding Sources 25,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 25,000 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 21 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -11 -006 Project Name Vernon: Replace Entrance & Exit Doors 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration -Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace interior and exterior doors at Vernon store due to age. Current doors were installed in 2000 and open and close around 800 times per day 6 days a week. Chemicals used during winter have eaten away at parts of doors over the years and repairs are becoming more frequent. Justification Takes advantage of newest technology in doors energy efficiency and safety standards. Less customer interruption with properly working doors. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 PROPOSED Page 22 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City. of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -13 -001 Project Name Vernon Tasting Area 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Administration -Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Redesign tasting area to make it more useful for customers and staff. Store was remodeled 10 years ago and we are looking to utilize the space better for staff and customers. Justification Opening space more will allow customers to stop and sample product more easily without clogging main isle. Increasing customer knowledge by sampling will in turn lead to increased sales. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 'row 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future . Total Liquor Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 23 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -13 -002 Project Name Liquor Signage- Interior/Exterior 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Administration - Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Buildings Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description teplace all interior and exterior signage with redesigned logo and graphics. Replace all outdoor signage with energy efficient LED lighting. Justification By changing the signage we will lower energy usage which is environmentally friendly. It will also lower our energy costs making our stores more fiscally responsible. It will allow us to be consistent in our branding of our three stores to our residents and community. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Liquor Fund 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 PROPOSED Page 24 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# H" -11 -002 Project Name Promenade Phase III 2013 /hru 2017 Type Expansion Department Community Development & HR Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description Complete the westerly Promenade section South of Hazelton Road: The westerly section of pathway was placed as a bituminous pathway until the properties t6 the west of the Promenade are redeveloped. The plan also includes a substantial water feature along this corridor. Justification Promenade Phase III supports the following Edina Vision 20/20 objectives: - Maintain strong residential neighborhoods, and - Take an active role in future redevelopment strategies. The greater Southdale area is seeing increasing mixed -use development. Both the Promenade and Centennial Lakes have played a key role in creating an environment that is attractive to both business and residential projects. Promenade Phase III was included in the 2007 Edina Promenade - Urban Design Plan, which states "The Promenade is a vital and key link in Edina's pathway network system, which provides internal circulation within the study area, as well as access from the adjoining neighborhoods and regional trail system." Following through with the Promenade Dhased Dlan will sunnort continued redevelopment through this corridor. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenanee 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total 2,000,000 2,000,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total 2,000,000 2,000,000 PROPOSED Page 25 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # HRA -11 -003 Project Name France Ave and TH62 Reconstruction 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Community Development & HR Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Hennepin County has developed an improved design of the interchange system at France Avenue and.TH62 Interchange. The improvement will reduce the potential for crashes at this interchange for the next 30 years. Hennepin County currently does not have funding for this improvement programmed in their CIP. Justification France Avenue is an important commercial corridor in Edina. Providing adequate and safe access from TH62 to France Ave helps to support Vision 20/20 objectives of- - Accomodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina and - Taking an active role in future redevelopment strategies The France Avenue and TH62 Interchange is one of the most congested interchanges in the metropolitan area. This congestion leads to many crashes at the intersections to the on ramps to TH62. This project would relieve the congestion at this interchange, therefore creating a safer access throueh France Avenue and to and from TH62. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction /Maintenance 600,000 600,000 Total Funding Sources 600,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 600,000 2016 2017 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 600,000 600,000 Total 600,000 600,000 PROPOSED Page 26 Tuesday. October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # 1 RA -13 -001 Project Name_ Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Community Development & HR Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Complete an overall Transportation Study of the Southdale Area to include pedestrian, bicycle and motorized traffic movement within the transportation system. Justification The greater Southdale areais an important commercial and residential corridor for both Edina and surrounding communities. Conducting a study of the transportation system will 1) assist the City in planning for future improvements, 2) enable the City to advocate more clearly for improvements at the county, regional and state level, and 3) prepare the City to apply for external funding, should those funding sources become available. The transportation study supports the City's current focus in Living Streets, as well as the following Edina Vision 20/20 objectives: - Accomodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina and - Taking an active role in future redevelopment strategies Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013. 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 27 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina. MN Project # HRA -13 -002 Project Name Pedestrian Bridge over TH62 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Community Development & HR Useful Life Contact Engineering Category infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Replace pedestrian bridge over TH62 west of Valley View Road to be ADA compliant. Justification Che current pedestrian bridge over TH62 is not ADA compliant. The location of this pedestrian bridge provides safe routes to both City park acilities, such as Rosland Park and Aquatic Center and to Edina Schools, such as Southview Middle School. This improvement will enhance he first phase of the Bike Boulevard project that will be implemented in fall of 2012. viding adequate and safe access for pedestrians and bicyclists helps to support Vision 20/20 objectives of- - Accomodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 3,000,000 3,000,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 3,000,000 3,000,000 PROPOSED Page 28 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # ENG -13 -001 'roject Name Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Program Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description 2013 thru 2017 These projects will provide for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of various local streets throughout the City. The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and pavements. These ratings are used to rank the local neighborhoods to determine potential future projects, which currently are: 2013: Mendelssohn A, Normandale, Braemar Hills B, St. Patricks Lane, Gleason Circle, and Lake Edina 2014: Clover Lane Addition, Hawkes Addition, Walnut Ridge, Edina Terrace, and Morningside 2015: Glen View Addition, Edina Highlands Lakeside, Holands, and Hyde Park 2016: Edina Bel -Air, Parkwood Knolls B, and Golf Terrace 2017: Townes Road, Birchcrest Addition, Colonial Court, Bekeley Heights, and Edina Valley Estates Please note that the above neighborhood names are reflective of the largest Subdivision Plat name found for that particular area and does not incorporated the neighborhood names that are currently being formulated by the Administration Department. Engineering will rename the projects, once neighborhood names are established. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the ap-ine infrastructure of the Citv." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 5,300,000 3,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,100,000 21,900,000 'total 5,300,000 3,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,100,000 21,900,000 21,900,000 Total 5,300,000 3,500,000 4,500,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Special Assessments 5,300,000 3,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,100,000 21,900,000 Total 5,300,000 3,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,100,000 21,900,000 PROPOSED Page 29 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -002 Project Name water Main Improvments 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description Update water system when reconstructing local neighborhood streets. See Project No. ENG -13 -001 for potential neighborhoods. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" by providing clean and adequate water supply and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The majority of the existing water system consists of unlined cast iron pipes. These pipes are more susceptible to failure than a lined ductile iron pipe or a pvc type pipe. The newer lined ductile iron pipes or pvc pipes will provide better water quality and water pressure. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,375,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 8,375,000 TOW 1,375,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 8,375,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 1,375,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 8,375,000 Total 1,375,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 11800,000 8,375,000 PROPOSED Page 30 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -003 Project Name Sanitary Sewer Main Improvements Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description 2013 thru 2017 The repair and replacement of sanitary sewer mains when reconstructing local neighborhood streets. See Project No. ENG -13 -001 for potential neighborhoods. lost of the sanitary sewer system consists of clay pipe that was installed up to the 1970's. This type of pipe is more prone to failure than the :urrent PVC and concrete pipes. The clay, pipe is typically more susceptible to root intrusion that decreases pipe capacity and contribute to Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Chapter 8 of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan also requires "Improving infrastructure to reduce inflow and infiltration." The upgrade to the sanitary sewer system will help reduce inflow and infiltration into the system due to deteriorating sanitary manholes, leaking pipe joints, and leaking manhole covers. These improvements reduce energy and treatment costs due to pumping and treating excess clear water. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,451,000 690,000 931,000 700,000 1,100,000 4,872,000 Total 1,451,000 690,000 931,000 700,000 1,100,000 4,872,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 1,451,000 690,000 931,000 700,000 1,100,000 4,872,000 Total 1,451,000 690,000 931,000 700,000 1,100,000 4,872,000 PROPOSED Page 31 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # ENG -13 -004 Project Name Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description The repair, replacement, and upgrading of the storm sewer system when reconstructing local neighborhood streets. See Project No. ENG -13- )01 for potential neighborhoods. This includes the addition of sump drain pipe for roof drains and sump pump discharge pipes. Justification need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and through "A Sound lic Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of City." pter 8 of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan also requires "Improving infrastructure to reduce inflow and infiltration." The City ected all properties in the late 1990's and continues to inspect 20% of properties per year. The program identified all homes in the City have sump pumps and other easement water problems. Inflow and infiltration will continue to be reduced by incorporating maintenance of iage swales & ponds and installation of sump drain pipes. These storm sewer improvements will provide a conduit for clear water harges especially during the winter months. This project also furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2011 City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,200,000 2,200,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 11,200,000 Total 1,200,000 2,200,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 11,200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 1,200,000 2,200,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 11,200,000 Total 1,200,000 2,200,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 11,200,000 PROPOSED Page 32 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -005 Project Name Piping Wells #15 and #9 to Treatment Plant No. 6 Type New Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 4 2013 thru 2017 Status Active Description Install last segment of raw.watermain from Wells #15 and #9 to Water Treatment Plant No: 6. This project was bid out in late August 2012 and the bids were over the estimate in the •2011 to 2015 Capital Improvement Program. Treatment Plant No. 6 is currently operating below the 4,000 GPM design. Connecting to these wells will complete the overall plan for this treatment plant. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,100,000 1,100,000 Total 1,100,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 1,100,000 1,100,000 Total 1,100,000 1,100,000 PROPOSED Page 33 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -006 Project Name Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety Projects Type New Useful Life Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 2 Status Active 2013 thru 2017 Description I These projects will provide new sidewalks, bikeways, and lighting throughout the City. An overall study of the system will need to be completed prior to prioritizing individual projects. Justification Che need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" by providing clean and rdequate water supply and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." The objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 also support this initiative hrough "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods." need is also emphasized in Chapter 12: Implementation of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "Work in conjunction with structure improvement projects to identify and implement sidewalk and bikeway networks within the City" and also "Diversify types of aortation methods within the Citv." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 250,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 650,000 Construction/Maintenance 550,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,550,000 Total Funding Sources 800,000 1,100,000 11100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Pedestrian Bike Safety Fund 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000 Total 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 11100,000 1,100,000 5,200,000 PROPOSED Page 34 Tuesdc� October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN d 2013 thru 2017 Project # ENG -13 -007 Project Name Bridge Rehabilitation: 78th St W and Gus Young Ln Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description These projects will,rehabilitate the 78th Street West bridge and the Gus Young Lane bridge`:over_the Canadian Pacific Railroad. These4wo bridges were identified in the 2011 bridge inspection as requiring a more in depth repair. Our bridge consultant is performing a °feasibility study during the fall of 2012 to identify in detail the work to be completed in 2013. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 20,000 20,000 Construction/Maintenance 150,000 150,000 Total 20,000 150,000 170,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 . Future Total Bonds - Public Improvement Re 20,000 150,000 170,000 Total 20,000 150,000 170,000 PROPOSED Page 35 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina. MN Project # ENG -13 -008 Project Name Reconstruct: 2nd Street South 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description The City of Hopkins is planning to reconstruct the Hopkins side of 2nd Street South between Monroe Avenue and Harrison Avenue, which the southerly half of this roadway is within the City of Edina. Reconstruction within the Edina side is to rehabilitate the storm sewer catch basins, retain the existing curb and gutter, and replace the roadway section. Justification fhe need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 120,000 120,000 Utility Fund - Storm 30,000 30,000 Total 150,000 150,000 PROPOSED Page 36 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -009 Project Name Reconstruct: Valley View Road Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description This project will reconstruct Municipal State Aid designated Valley.View Road from McCauley Trail South to Hilary Lane. This roadway will provide _for a new.roadway section and will bring the road into compliance with Municipal State Aid standards. Bike lanes along with a sidewalk.will,be included with this.upgrade._ Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." IThis need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 100,000 200,000 300,000 Construction/Maintenance 800,000 800,000 Total 100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Municipal State Aid 880,000 880,000 Special Assessments 140,000 140,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Water 40,000 40,000 Total 11100,000 1,100,000 PROPOSED Page 37 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN "roject # ENG -13 -010 'roject Name Reconstruct: Tracy Avenue 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project will reconstruct Municipal State Aid designated Tracy Avenue from TH62 to Benton Avenue. This roadway will provide for a new roadway section and will bring the road into compliance with Municipal State Aid standards. Bike lanes along with sidewalk(s) will be included with this upgrade. The bridge over TH62 is not included in this Capital Plan sheet. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to 'continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the Citv." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 200,000 164,000 364,000 Construction/Maintenance 936,000 936,000 Total 200,000 1,100,000 1,300,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Municipal State Aid 700,000 700,000 Special Assessments 145,000 145,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 145,000 145,000 Utility Fund - Storm 90,000 90,000 Utility Fund - Water 220,000 220,000 TOW 1,300,000 1,300,000 PROPOSED Page 38 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # ENG -13 -011 Project Name 2013 -2014 Flood Protection and Water Improvements Type Expansion Useful Life Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 4 Status Active Description The Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) prioritizes 46 construction projects (C1 -46) and 16 engineering (E1 -16) studies to improve local flood protection -and surface water quality. Most engineering studies will result in additional construction project recommendations. This item proposes to study and design projects E1, E3, E5 -10, in 2013 and 2014. Estimated construction costs will be programmed into the 2013 Capital Improvement Plan and will be constructed in 2015. Projects are one of, or a mix of the following types: Maintenance and improvement of, conveyance and storage systems that reduce storm runoff peak discharge rates and volumes and provide local flood protection, or treatment systems that remove sediment, phosphorus and nitrogen and other particulate bound pollutants. Projects in this improvement are spread around the City. Improvements such as grading, and plant material can have extremely long useful lives and can partially self - maintain. The project also include durable infrastructure such as pumps, pipes and stone erosion treatments with variable lifespans ranging from 30 to 100 years. Sediment capturing features such as ponds and sediment traps have highly variable useful lives, and depend more on maintenance to extend lifecvcle. Justification I . This project furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2011 City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 30,000 35,000 65,000 Construction/Maintenance 250,000 250,000 Total 30,000 35,000 250,000 315,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund- Storm 30,000 35,000 250,000 .315,000 Total 30,000 35,000 250,000 315,000 PROPOSED Page 39 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # ENG-13 -012 Project Name 2014 -2015 Flood Protection and Water Improvements Type Expansion Useful Life Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 4 Status Active Description He Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) prioritizes 46 construction projects (C1 -46) and 16 ;ngineering (E1 -16) studies to improve local flood protection and surface water quality. This item proposes to study project E12 and design )rojects C3, C 13 -16 in 2014 and construct them in 2015. This group of projects is in and around Braemar Golf Course. :s are one of, or a mix of the following types: Maintenance and improvement of; conveyance and storage systems that reduce storm peak discharge rates and volumes and provide local flood protection, or treatment systems that remove sediment, phosphorus and n and other particulate bound pollutants. :ments such as grading, and plant material can have extremely long useful lives and can partially self - maintain. The project also durable infrastructure such as pumps, pipes and stone erosion treatments with variable lifespans ranging from 30 to 100 years. it capturing features such as ponds and sediment traps have highly variable useful lives, and depend more on maintenance to extend Justification project furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2011 of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 50,000 275,000 50,000 275,000 Total Funding Sources 50,000 Prior 2013 2014 275,000 2015 2016 325,000 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 50,000 275,000 325,000 Total 50,000 275,000 325,000 PROPOSED Page 40 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # ENG -13 -013 Project Name 2015 -2016 Flood Protection and Water Improvements Type Expansion Useful Life Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 5Important Status Active Description I The Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) prioritizes 46 construction projects (CT -46) and 16 :ngineering (E146) studies to improve local flood protection and surface water quality. This item proposes to study project E12 and design projects C1,2,4 -6 in 2015 and construct them in 2016. This group of projects is in and around Fred Richards Golf Course and South East :s are one of, or a mix of the following types: Maintenance and improvement of; conveyance and storage systems that reduce storm peak discharge rates and volumes and provide local flood protection, or treatment systems that remove sediment, phosphorus and :n and other particulate bound pollutants. Improvements such as grading, and plant material can have extremely long useful lives and can partially self - maintain. The project also include durable infrastructure such as pumps, pipes and stone erosion treatments with variable lifespans ranging from 30 to 100 years. Sediment capturing features such as ponds and sediment traps have highly variable useful lives, and depend more on maintenance to extend Justification This project furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2011 City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 50,000 50,000 Construction/Maintenance 275,000 275,000 TOW 50,000 275,000 325,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 50,000 275,000 325,000 Total 50,000 275,000 325,000 PROPOSED Page 41 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a ENG -13 -014 Project Name Morningside Neighborhood Water Main Relining Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description 2013 thru 2017 This project provides for cement lining of the water mains that have not been lined in the Morningside Neighborhood. These streets include Oakdale Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Crocker Avenue, Grimes Avenue, Morningside Road, and Branson Street. Staff anticipates using the City of Minneapolis's watermain lining contractor to perform the lining of the water mains. Scott Terrace and Alden Avenue are also scheduled to be lined as part of the Neighborhood Street Reconstruction progam (ENG -13 -001). Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 200,000 100,000 300,000 Total 200,000 100,000 300,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water Total 200,000 100,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 300,000 PROPOSED Page 42 Tuesday. October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -015 Project Name Mill and Overlay: Benton Avenue 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project involves milling 2" of the distressed pavement and repaving a new surface of Municipal State Aid designated Benton Avenue from Hansen Road to TH100. This type of rehabilitation" technique along with proper sealcoating will provide approximately 20 additional years to the life of the pavement. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 70,000 70,000 Construction/Maintenance 380,000 380,000 Total 450,000 450,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Bonds - Public Improvement Re 70,000 70,000 Municipal State Aid 380,000 380,000 TOW 450,000 450,000 PROPOSED Page 43 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # ENG -13 -016 Project Name Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan Type New Useful Life Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 5Important Status Active Description Surface water management plans typically are updated on a ten year cycle, with policy and flood prediction and water quality modeling updates happening at a more frequent interval. This item would update the C WRMP through a major amendment that would include revised policy and a revision of the water models used for decision making. Justification This project furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2011 City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 PROPOSED Page 44 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -017 Project Name Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Type New Useful Life Category Infrastructure Description Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 4 Status Active 2013 thru 2017 In 2010 the Minnesota Pollution Control' Agency began the process of revising the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) general permit. The process is near completion and it is anticipated that the new permit will go into effect in 2013. This project meets the initial requirements of the revised permit by planning and revising the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP.) This revision will be prepared by an outside consultant with oversight of the Council, Staff and Advisory Commissions, and will be presented to the Council for consideration. The revised MS4 permit is expected_to put significant new regulatory burden on staff time and construction costs as described in the 2011 Utility Rate Study. This project meets the requirements of the newly revised state general permit for MS4 permit. Some of the unfunded mandates passed on by the state overlap well with the comprehensive plan and the clean water and flood protection goals articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comnrehensive Plan, while manv do not. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 PROPOSED Page 45 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ENG -13 -018 Project Name NMWD Petition Projects -Phase 1 Type New Useful Life Category Infrastructure Description Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 4 Status Active 2013 thru 2017 In 2011 The City of Edina petitioned the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (WD) to undertake a series of clean water and flood protection projects in and tributary to Nine Mile Creek. The first phase of the project will work in the stream bed and nearby public areas to prevent erosion and sedimentation from upstream area, ensure adequate flood flow capacity, provide resistance to scour and reduce nutrient flow to the stream. The Feasibility report currently estimates this project costs at $2.4 million. The majority of the project costs are borne by the Watershed District, but the City is required to pay 75% of easement acquisition costs and 50% of ancillary (non -water quality related) project costs. Easement acquisition is expected to take place in late 2014, and construction in early 2015. Improvements such as grading, and plant material can have extremely long useful lives and can partially self - maintain. The project also include durable infrastructure such as pipes and stone erosion treatments with variable lifespans ranging from 30 to 100 years. Justification This project furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the 2011 City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Land Acquisition 180,000 180,000 Construction/Maintenance 140,000 140,000 TOW 180,000 140,000 320,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 180,000 140,000 320,000 Total 180,000 140,000 320,000 PROPOSED Page 46 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a ENG -13 -019 Project Name Engineering Department Equipment Replacement Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active llescrtptzon 2013 thru 2017 Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Engineering department's equipment includes several vehicles, survey equipment and some software. Most of the 'vehicles have estimated useful lives of 10 years, the survey equipment varies between 7 -15 years, and the software is scheduled for 10 years. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 41,000 45,000 25,000 28,000 139,000 Total 41,000 45,000 25,000 28,000 139,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 41,000 45,000 25,000 28,000 139,000 Total 41,000 45,000 25,000 28,000 139,000 PROPOSED Page 47 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thra, 2017 1dLT Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 50,000 50,000 Construction /Maintenance 400,000 400,000 Total 450,000 450,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Bonds - Public Improvement Re 50,000 50,000 Municipal State Aid 350,000 350,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 25,000 25,000 Utility Fund - Storm 15,000 15,000 Utility Fund - Water 10,000 10,000 TOW 450,000 450,000 PROPOSED Page 48 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, XW Project # PW_01 =012 Project Name Reconstruct: W 54th St. (Wooddale to, France) Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical 2013 thru 2017 Status Active.. : ............. m......... Description This project will reconstruct Municipal State Aid desigriated'54th Street West.from Wooddale Avenue toTrance Avenue. This roadway will provide for a new`roadway section and will bring the road into compliance with Municipal State Aid standards. Bike lanes along with sidewalk(s) will be included with this upgrade. This project will be constructed in conjunction with the reconstruction of the bridge over Minnehaha Creek. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure ". This.project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 150,000 158,000 308,000 Construction/Maintenance 792,000 792,000 Total 150,000 950,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Municipal State Aid 880,000 880,000 Special Assessments 140,000 140,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Water 40,000 40,000 Total 11100,000 1,100,000 PROPOSED Page 49 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # PW -04 -001 Project Name Reconstruct: W 58th St (Wooddale to France) Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description This project will reconstruct Municipal State Aid designated 58th Street West from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue. This roadway will provide for a new roadway section and will bring the road into compliance with Municipal State Aid standards. Bike lanes along with sidewalk(s) will be included with this upgrade. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 150,000 158,000 308,000 Construction/Maintenance 792,000 792,000 Total 150,000 950,000 1,100,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Municipal State Aid 880,000 880,000 Special Assessments 140,000 140,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Water 40,000 40,000 TOW 1,100,000 1,100,000 PROPOSED Page 50 Tuesday, October l6 2012 i Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a PW -05 -003 Project Name Bridge: 54th Street Bridge Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life 100 years . Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical 2013 rhru 2017 Status Active Description This project will reconstruct the bridge over Minnehaha Creek. The bridge will be reconstructed in conjunction with the roadway I econstruction project, see ENG -12 -018. - Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and "Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 180,000 100,000 Construction /Maintenance 720,000 280,000 720,000 Total 180,000 820,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 .2017 Future 1,000,000 Total Municipal State Aid 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 PROPOSED Page 51 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 1hru 2017 Project # Pw -05 -006 Project Name Mill & Overlay: Olinger Blvd (Vernon - Tracy) Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description This project involves milling 2" of the distressed pavement and repaving a new surface of Municipal State Aid designated Olinger Road from Vernon Avenue to Tracy Avenue. This type of rehabilitation technique along with proper sealcoating will provide approximately 20 additional years to the life of the pavement. Justification the need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public infrastructure." This project also meets the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 of "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and 'Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina." need is also emphasized in the infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning/Design 100,000 100,000 Construction/Maintenance 700,000 700,000 Total 800,000 800,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Bonds - Public Improvement Re 100,000 100,000 Municipal State Aid 700,000 700,000 Total 800,000 800,000 PROPOSED Page 52 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 rrglecr a UT -03 -010 Project Name Remove Lift Station No. 1 K? . I fd Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 3 Significant j Status Active Description The rehabilitation of Lift Station No. 1, located at 4041 Sunnyside Road, was originally in the 2009 to 2013 Capital Improvement Plana Staff had determined that the lift station could be eliminated if a gravity line was constructed draining to the south to the gravity line on Meadow Road. The cost difference between reconstructing the lift station and eliminating the lift station by constructing a gravity line is $82,000; total cost over 30. ears is $219,000 due to op eratin and maintenance of the lift station. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and "A Sound Public Infrastructure." The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Land Acquisition 20,000 20,000 Construction/Maintenance 130,000 130,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 PROPOSED Page 53 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -002 Project Name New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) Type New Useful Life 50 years Category Infrastructure Description Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 4 Status Active 2013 thru 2017 (Conduct feasibility / implementation study to construct Water Treatment Plant No. 5 north of Southdale Water Tower. The feasibility study I will provide staff with a timeframe of when this treatment plant needs to be online due to development in the greater Southdale Area. The treatment plant will filter water from Well No. 5 and 18, see UT -08 -008. Justification need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" by providing clean and uate water supply and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to dinue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." During the summer months, the majority of the water supplied in the City does not treat for iron or manganese. This unfiltered water in part contributes to the aesthetic problems including red and/or brown water complaints. The new treatment plant will help reduce the amount of complaints that we receive from the issue of aesthetic water complaints. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 150,000 150,000 Construction /Maintenance 7,000,000 7,000,000 Total 150,000 7,000,000 7,150,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 150,000 7,000,000 7,150,000 Total 150,000 7,000,000 7,150,000 PROPOSED Page 54 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project 4 UT -08 -008 Project Name Piping Wells #5 and #18 to WTP #5 Type New Department Engineering Useful Life 100 years Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical 2013 thru 2017 Status Active Description Install last segment of raw watermain from Wells #5 and #8 to be treated at WTP #5. The first and second 'segments were installed during West 70th Street Round -about and the Promenade projects. This will provide untreated water to the proposed Water Treatment Plant No. 5, see UT -07 -002, located north of the Southdale Water Tower. This project is anticipated to be constructed simultaneously with the France Avenue Intersection Enhancement project. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" by providing clean and adequate water supply and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." During the summer months, the majority of the water supplied in the City is not treated for iron or manganese. This unfiltered water in part contributes to the aesthetic problems including red and/or brown water complaints. The new treatment plant will help reduce the amount of complaints that we receive from the issue of aesthetic water complaints. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 450,000 100,000 550,000 Total 450,000 100,000 550,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 ,2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 450,000 100,000 550,000 Total 450,000 100,000 550,000 PROPOSED Page 55 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -08 -014 Project Name Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Type Replace or repair Useful Life Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Engineering Priority 5Important Status Active 2013 thru 2017 Description During the fall and winter of 2012 Engineering, with help of a consultant, will have conducted a feasibility/implementation study to line an existing trunk sanitary sewer along the Minnehaha Creek from West 50th Street to Xerxes Avenue and also along Nine Mile Creek. The study will provide a phasing plan for a two year project to line these sanitary sewer trunk lines. Justification need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and through "A Sound lic Infrastructure." This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of City. 8 of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan also requires "Improving infrastructure to reduce inflow and infiltration." The upgrade to [ary sewer trunk line will help reduce inflow and infiltration into the system. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 Total Funding Sources 60,000 Prior 540,000 2013 600,000 2014 2015 2016 1,200,000 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 Total 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 PROPOSED Page 56 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -10 -011 Project Name W 69th Street and York Ave Water Main Loop Type New Useful Life 100 years Category Infrastructure Department Engineering Contact Utility Supt. Priority 5Important Status Active 2013 thru 2017 Description This project completes the water main loop from the easterly side of the 69th Street Apartments located on 69th Street West and Xerxes Avenue to 70th Street West and York Avenue. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure ". This need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." A goal of every water system is to provide redundancy of the system. This project provides the redundancy, which also provides enhanced fire flows and overall better quality of water. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 PROPOSED Page 57 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -12 -008 Project Name Asset Management Update Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Equipment Priority 4 2013 /hru 2017 Status Active Description This project provides for updating our current asset management system computer software to be more interactive with the public and mobile with City staff. The current system contains information on all infrastructure assets, such as water system, sanitary sewer system, storm sewer system, traffic signs, street lights, etc. Staff can perform basic functions such as keeping track of the assets, request for service and work orders. The public will be able to report an issue via their smart phone and the issue will be recorded directly into the system. City staff will then be able to receive service requests and create work orders in the field vie smart phones, tablets, or laptops. Therefore becoming more efficient with their daily tasks. These upgrades will also allow for the consolidation of software systems that we currently use to issue permits and the addition of others stems such as fleet services, building management, etc. Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment," "Effective and Valued City Services," "A Sound Public Infrastructure," and "Innovation." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 287,000 Total 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 287,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 21,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 96,000 Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 95,000 Utility Fund - Water 21,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 96,000 TOW 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 287,000 PROPOSED Page 58 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -12 -009 Project Name Cooper Circle Pond Outlet Type New Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important 2013 thru 2017 Status Active Description This project provides fora storm sewer outlet from the' landlocked - Cooper Circle Pond. This storm sewer outlet will eliminate City staff from needing to pump this pond during periods of high water. Therefore, reducing the flooding potential around this pond.- =Justification The need to improve this infrastructure was initiated by the vision of Edina's Vision 20/20 - "Livable Environment" and through "A Sound Public Infrastructure." This project also furthers the goal of clean water and flood protection as articulated in Section 8.2 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and the JCity of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 PROPOSED Page 59 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # COM -13 -001 Project Name City of Edina Wireless Network 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department General Government Functions Useful Life Contact IT Manager Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description To meet the demands of our customers, the Communications & Technology Services Department began working with LOGIS to develop a plan :o implement free wireless network and internet access (Wi -Fi) in 2012. The goal of the initial Edina wireless project was to establish Wi -Fi :overage to be used by the public and City staff at Edina City Hall, Edina Art Center, Braemar Arena, Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park, Edina Senior Center and the Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility. Future expansion of the project is planned :o include additional City facilities and buildings, including fire stations and some parks. wireless internet access has become so commonplace that people visiting City Hall and other City facilities expect it. As Wi -Fi capable ;es continue to become increasingly more prevalent in the daily lives of the public and City staff, offering this service adds a significant 6t to the City's residents, customers and staff, and is in alip-nment with the Citv's Vision 20/20 Dian. Justification one of the City Leadership Priorities in the 2012 Work Plan is "Improve Communications Tools." One of the objectives toward meeting that ;oal was to implement the "EdinaOpen" Wi -Fi system at City facilities. of the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 is to "Evaluate and advancements to Drovide Citv services." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 PROPOSED Page 60 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # COM -13 =002 Project Name Gateway Signs 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department General Government Functions Useful Life Contact Communications Category Infrastructure Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description k gateway sign,is.often the first impression people have'of a city, development, business park or other public place. A well planned and :xecuted gateway sign is important because it gives an immediate sense of a brand and denotes a sense of pride and caring, and makes visitors :eel welcome. fhe City's Branding Committee and Communications & Technology Services Department recommends the placement of "Welcome to Edina" ;ateway signs. Further, the committee and Communications & Technology Services Department recommends coordinating park and business Iistrict signs. Business district signs are recommended for 50th & France (replacing the dated ones there), Southdale and Grandview. They night also be considered for 44th & France and 70th & Cahill. Id this project be approved, a consultant would be hired to design the signs, which would be fabricated and installed over the next few Suggested order of implementation is gateway signs, large park signs, regular park signs, business district signs. Stone gateway signs lighting are estimated to be $125,000 to $175,000 each. Coordinating metal monument entrance signs for large parks such as Arneson s, Braemar, Bredesen, Pamela, Rosland and Van Valkenburg parks are estimated to cost $10,000 to $20,000 each. Basic park signs are sated to cost $3.000 to $10.000 each. Justification One of the City Leadership Priorities in the 2012 Work Plan is "Improve Communications Tools." One of the objectives toward meeting that goal is to implement branding standards. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning/Design 20,000 20,000 Construction/Maintenance 915,000 380,000 1,295,000 Total 935,000 380,000 1,315,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund. 935,000 380,000 1,315,000 Total 935,000 380,000 1,315,000 PROPOSED Page 61 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # COM -13 -003 Project Name Communications and IT Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department General Government Functions Useful Life Contact Communications Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Communications & Technology department has a variety of equipment including video production equipment, cameras, monitors, servers, switches and routers. Most of this type of electronic equipment has a useful life between 5 -10 years. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 186,000 136,900 53,900 32,900 80,000 489,700 Total 186,000 136,900 53,900 32,900 80,000 489,700 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 186,000 136,900 53,900 32,900 80,000 489,700 Total 186,000 136,900 53,900 32,900 80,000 489,700 PROPOSED Page 62 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project q CW -02 -001 Project Name Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department General Government Functions Useful Life 30 years Contact IT Manager Category Infrastructure Priority 6 Status Active Description fhe City's installed fiber optic network provides connectivity from City Hall to remote City facilities and LOGIS, facilitating voice and data ;ommunication at very high speeds. Fiber optic technology is secure, reliable and fast, and has a useful life expectancy of approximately 30 /ears. Nearly all of the City's staffed facilities are now connected via fiber optic lines. fhe City has used fiber optic technology to replace traditional copper and leased circuit connections in order to improve bandwidth, ;onsolidate connectivity needs, and reduce or eliminate telephone and data communication expenses. By leveraging a single owned connection nethod for multiple technology and communication needs, the City has been able to eliminate expensive recurring T -1 voice and data ;onnections, while dramatically improving performance and management of the City's voice and data network. wing completion of the remaining staffed facilities, the focus of fiber optic installations would be directed toward the Edina Police rtment's precinct at Southdale Center, Fred Richards Executive Golf Course and the City's various warming house and comfort station ions, replacing slow and costly telephone circuits used for security and access control systems, allowing for eased and consolidated gement of these systems. Additionally, fiber is envisioned to run to all of the City's lift stations, wells, water treatment facilities and towers. Currently, those Utilities systems operate on SCADA radio systems, which are susceptible to wind, rain and ice storms that the systems vulnerable. If fiber is run to those facilities, the Public Works Department would have redundancy in place that does not today. City has used fiber optic technology to replace traditional copper and leased circuit connections in order to improve bandwidth, ;olidate connectivity needs, and reduce or eliminate telephone and data communication expenses. ' By leveraging a single owned connection iod for multiple technology and communication needs, the City has been able to eliminate expensive recurring T -1 voice and data sections_ while dramatically imorovine oerformance and management of the Citv's voice and data network. - - Justification Dne of the City Leadership Priorities in the 2012 Work Plan is "Improve Communications Tools." of the objectives of Edina's Vision 20/20 is to "Evaluate and advancements to provide City services." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 225,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Total 225,000 75,000 75,000- 375,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 225,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Total 225,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 PROPOSED Page 63 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GG -11 -004 Project Name Electronic Document Management 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department General Government Functions Useful Life Contact City Clerk Category Equipment Priority 5Important Status Active Description Develop either a Request for Quote (RFQ) or Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit vendors for implementing an Enterprise Document Management System. Such a system would incorporate the following objects: - Avoid duplication of information and records - Reduce document production costs - Increase productivity due to easy automated access - Control access to sensitive records - Protect vital records against security threats, disasters - Preserve data integrity via controlled storage and delivery - Share information across multiple departments and with the Public - Records Retention and Records Destruction Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 2 states the City provides a level of services that sets Edina apart from other communities. Implementing a city-wide electronic record management program will bring more efficiency to local government and accessibility of public data to the public. In achieving this goal Edina will: - Enhances service to internal and external customers of Edina - Reduce the cost of storage space, supplies and search time - Allow secure document back -up for off -site storage and disaster recovery - Improve workflow efficiency Vision 20/20 Objective 7 states the City will evaluate and efficiently employ technological advancements to provide City services. Implementing an enterprise document management system would enhance communication with constituents by allowing more electronic access to our "archived" records. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance EquipNehicles /Fumishings 65,000 65,000 25,000 25,000 130,000 Total Funding Sources 65,000 Prior 2013 65,000 2014 25,000 2015 2016 155,000 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 65,000 65,000 25,000 155,000 Total 65,000 65,000 25,000 155,000 PROPOSED Page 64 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GG -13 -001 Project Name Assessing Division Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department General Government Functions Useful Life Contact Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Assessing division currently has 3 vehicles that are part of the equipment replacement program, each with an estimated useful life of 10 years. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 30,000 30,000 TOW 30,000 30,000 PROPOSED Page 65 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# GG -13 -002 Project Name Election Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department General Government Functions Useful Life Contact City Clerk Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description I teplace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Elections equipment includes mostly voting stations. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 PROPOSED Page 66 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, NW Project # HR -13 -001 Project Name HRIS/Payroll 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department General Government Functions Useful Life 10 years Contact Category Equipment Priority 2 Status Active Description I Implement an HRIS / Payroll system with the ability to manage employee information including compensation, benefit elections, electronic :ime card entry, personnel files, performance information, and employee demographic information. Justification I Each.year, the City hires approximately 10 -30 full -time employees and 500 new and returning seasonal employees. Approximately the same lumber leaves employment each year. There are also numerous changes to individual compensation, benefits, and other information :hroughout the year. Our current system has been in place for well over a decade. It does not allow us to easily track, change, and access nformation in useable formats. e of the goals for the newly created HR Department is to modernize and streamline 14R services. Previously, most HR transactions (job )lications, time card entry, benefits elections, etc ) required extensive manual tracking. This made the process time consuming and fficient as well as reduced accuracy due to a lack of centralization of information. In 2012, the City launched an online job application. The y is now working on the second phase which is online completion of new employee paperwork. The benefits to both systems include: - Candidates can apply on line without obtaining and mailing in a paper copy. - Candidates and returning employees will now only need to complete one application for various positions. - Rehires can easily update their information online, instead of completing new application materials each year. - Hiring managers and HR will work off of one system so there will be faster and more streamlined tracking and evaluation of applications. - The Onboarding system will reduce the number of forms required for new employees, and allow hiring managers, HR, and payroll to more quickly and efficiently track and process the many legal and logistical requirements for new employees. In 2013 -2014, the City hopes to take the next step in planning for a new HRIS/Payroll system including electronic timecards, compensation administration, benefits administration, performance management and personnel files. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 20,000 50,000 150,000 - 220,000 Total Funding Sources 20,000 Prior 50,000 2013 150,000 2014 2015 2016 220,000 2017 Future Total Construction Fund Equipment Replacement Progra Other - 2010 Unassigned Fund 20,000 - 50,000 60,000 35,000 55,000 60,000 35,000 125,000 TOW 20,000 50,000 150,000 220,000 PROPOSED Page 67 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN PROPOSED Page 68 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -00 -033 Project Name Pamela Park: Renovate senior athletic field 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life .Unassigned Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description ?,e-grade the soccer field turf and provide new sand and peat mixture sub -soils and re- install the underground irrigation system. This soccer field is in need of re- grading for proper drainage purposes and to correct uneven turf conditions. The irrigation system is in keeping with the Turf Management Plan which relies on proper irrigation and drainage to allow for reduced use of herbicides. Upgrading this field will help to improve our facilities which are stressed beyond capacity. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects re purpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 330,000 330,000 Total 330,000 330,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 330,000 330,000 TOW 330,000 330,000 PROPOSED Page 69 Tuesday. October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -07 -004 Project Name Pamela Park: New athletic field 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 6 Status Active Description I Develop a new multi - purpose athletic field adjacent to the senior athletic field on the south end of Pamela Park. Justification There is more demand for multi - purpose athletic fields than there is supply. The same multi - purpose athletic fields are used to support the games of football, soccer, lacrosse, rugby and ultimate frisbee. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 400,000 400,000 Total 400,000 400,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 400,000 400,000 Total 400,000 400,000 PROPOSED Page 70 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -08 -006 Project Name Lewis Park: Pathway lighting 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project would include decorative pathway lighting fixtures along the pathway at Lewis Park. Justification The pathway around the perimeter of Lewis Park receives a tremendous amount of use on a year round basis. There are'many elderly adults that enjoy walking on the pathway year round. During the late fall through early spring the park pathway receives a lot of use during the hours of darkness. Pathway lighting would enhance safety and further promote walking on the pathway on a year round basis. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These oroiects reouroose aeine infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund - 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 PROPOSED Page 71 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -10 -005 Project Name Pamela Park: South Parking Lot Expansion Type Expansion Useful Life Category Parks 2013 thru 2017 Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority 6 Status Active Description The project involves expansion of the parking lot on the south end of Pamela Park. The redesign will include striping of the parking lot to make more efficient use of existing parking. 20 -23 additional parking stalls are proposed to be added to the south parking lot. Justification On occasional evenings, there is not enough parking capacity to serve scheduled programs and as a result, park users are parking on the grass. The new additional small rectangular athletic field is also expected to require some additional parking capacity. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 40,000 40,000 Total Funding Sources 40,000 40,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 PROPOSED Page 72 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -10 -006 Project Name Pamela Park: North Parking Lot Expansion 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 6 Status Active Description This project proposes to improve :the flow of traffic into the north parking-lot (near the park shelter building), create more parking capacity ` where possible and stripe the'lot fo make parking safer and more efficient. Justification The existing north parking lotdoes not have well defined parking stalls, which leads to an inefficient and unsafe parking lot. As a result, park users park unlawfully on the grass. During high peak scheduled activities, there are not enough parking stalls to accommodate the demand. Additional parking stalls will make the lot safer, more efficient and keep park patrons from parking on neighborhood streets. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total' Construction/Maintenance 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 PROPOSED Page 73 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -10 -007 Project Name Pamela Park: West Parking Lot Expansion Type Expansion Useful Life Category Parks Description 2013 thru IC 17 Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority 6 Status Active Pamela Park's west parking lot renovation includes removal of existing asphalt surface, developing a new sub -base, installing a new wear- course of asphalt followed by a finish coat of asphalt and adding concrete curbing around the perimeter. The plan calls for an expansion opportunity to add 37 more parking stalls to the west lot. Justification The west parking lot will be in need of total renovation in 2013. Concrete curbing is needed to deter people from parking on the grass or driving through the park. Additional parking is needed to keep visitors from parking on the grass during peak use periods. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These nroiects revurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 PROPOSED Page 74 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -11 -006 Project Name Bredesen Park: Comfort Station Renovation 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project calls for complete renovation of the plumbin&system that serves the mess and womens restroom facilities at the Bredesen Park comfort station. The system will be redesigned which also involves relocating existing interior walls and underground piping. Justification The plumbing system including the sanitary sewer design at the Bredesen Park comfort station has long been in need of a new design that will eliminate the continual and frequent expensive repairs. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: 'Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 PROPOSED Page 75 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 thru 2017 Project # PK -11 -007 Project Name Normandale Park: Replace Warming House /Shelter Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 6 Status Active Description I this project involves replacement of the Normandale Park warming house /shelter building with a more modem design similar to the concept at Weber Park and Cornelia School Park. Justification I The Normandale Park shelter building was designed and built in the 1970's and no longer meets resident's needs and expectations. The community has expressed an interest in having a shelter building that is more user friendly for social gatherings and meeting spaces on a year round basis, similar to the newer shelter buildings at Weber Park and Cornelia School Park. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 650,000 650,000 Total 650,000 650,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 650,000 650,000 Total 650,000 650,000 PROPOSED Page 76 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK =12 -002 Project Name VanValkenburg Park construction 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description This project involves the development of the Van Valkenburg Park playground area that was designed by Brauer and Associates with input from resident neighbors. The plan includes a small playground, park benches, a tennis court, a half -size basketball court, walking path and landscaping. It is the area immediately next to the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Park Terrace (just east of the water tower). After the completion of the homes and development along Interlachen Boulevard and Park Terrace, residents requested the development of city- owned park land to serve as a mini -park. The next closest playground for neighborhood children is Alden Park which is approximately 1/3 of a mile away from Van Valkenburg Park. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability ". Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 600,000 600,000 Total 600,000 600,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 600,000 600,000 Total 600,000 600,000 PROPOSED Page 77 Tuesday. October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -001 Project Name Parks Department Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Parks department has a•wide variety of equipment that includes grass mowers and other parks maintenance equipment, passenger vehicles and heavy equipment. The expected useful life of this equipment ranges from about 7 years for some of the mowers up to 10 years for most of the passenger vehicles. A few pieces of the heavy equipment are expected to last 111) to 20 vears. Justification tegular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 31,600 310,180 Total 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 31,600 310,180 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 31,600 310,180 Total 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 31,600 310,180 PROPOSED Page 78 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -002 Project Name Utley Park: Bathrooms Renovation Tvne RenInre nr rennir Denartment Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 1 Critical ,Status Active Description This is for the renovation of the men's and women's restrooms at Utley Park to comply with ADA law to make the restroom facilities handicap accessible, updated, more Welcoming-and user friendly. The renovations will be completed in unison with the renovations scheduled for the adjoining utility well building structure. Justification The Utley Park bathroom facilities are over 40 years old and thus do not meet ADA requirements and are outdated not user friendly. These undersized restrooms have the original bathroom fixtures, wall coverings, flooring and partitions. There is a non - accessible step to enter the bathrooms that needs to be redesigned. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 PROPOSED Page 79 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -003 Project Name Lake Edina Park: Pathway Type New Useful Life Category Parks 2013 thru 2017 Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority 5Important Status Active Description This is for the construction of a new 10' wide asphalt pathway in Lake Edina Park that will create a connection for pedestrians and cyclists aetween Parklawn and Kellogg. Justification There is a much needed safe hard- surface pathway connection for walkers and cyclists to travel between Kellogg and Parklawn Ave. This project is in keeping with our Attitude and Interest Survey results which show the community's strong interest in more trails. This project also lines up with Objective 41 in the Vision 20/20 Plan where one of the strategies includes "Work to construct sidewalks adjoining State Aid streets and to promote safe pedestrian travel." This new pathway will help connect neighborhoods and also serve as a safe route to school. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 PROPOSED Page 80 Tuesday, October l6. 20/2 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -004 Project Name Highlands Park: Basketball Court Type New Useful Life Category Parks 2013 thru 2017 Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description This is for the construction of a new half -size basketball court for the east side of Highlands Park. Justification For many years, neighbors of the Highlands Park neighborhood have requested an outdoor basketball court. The majority of the park is consumed with scheduled soccer games and practices. The neighbors have long requested more park amenities for neighboring families and their children for unscheduled play. A basketball court has been the most frequent request. A half -size basketball court is favored over a full - size court to detract from becoming a destination basketball court for adult games in a park that is already heavily used by residents throughout Edina for scheduled athletic play. There are only six outdoor basketball courts within our 40 parks. This park improvement is in keeping with Vision 20/20 that calls for "A Sound Public Infrastructure... Edina streets, utilities, parks and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 81 Tuesday. October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -005 Project Name Garden Park: Baseball Field 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description This is a $300,000 project to completely renovate the Garden Park baseball field and add batting cages, dugouts, scoreboards, storage and concessions. The project also requires the replacement of existing fencing and irrigation system. The Edina Baseball Association is offering to donate $100,000 towards the project costs and the proposal is to apply for a $100,000 grant from the Hennepin Youth Sports Grant administered by the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission. Justification I The Garden Park baseball field is in need of renovation mainly because the field has a very poor drainage system. The field remains wet and unplayable for a lengthy period following a rain event. The field has poor sub -soils and was originally filled will street and sidewalk demolition debris (concrete and rebar). The project engineer has designed a financially reasonable solution. This is the only other large baseball field venue for the oldest youth and adult baseball program. There is a strong desire in the baseball community to bring the Garden Park baseball field up to the same standard as the Courtney Field #1 baseball field which hosts the varsity boys baseball program. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 300,000 300,000 Total Funding Sources 300,000 Prior 2013 2014 300,000 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund Grants & Donations 100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 Total 300,000 300,000 PROPOSED Page 82 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK=13 -006 Project Name Wooddale Park: Playground Equipment 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description This is a $200,000 project to replace the existing playground equipment at Wooddale Paile with a primarily barrier free designed- layground structure. A neighboring resident has offered to organize a fundraising effort to cover a large share of the replacement cost and also pursue a $100,000 grant from the Hennepin Youth Sports Grant administered by the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission. The success of fundraising and success of receiving grant monies are unknowns and therefore staff proposes that a not to exceed project fund of $100,000 be set aside from the construction fund as a fallback position for the 2013 Capital Improvement Plan. Justification There has been a past practice of encouraging residents to secure fundraising dollars as a means to place a park improvement higher on the priority list. The construction of Fox Meadow Park and the most recent project at Braemar Arena (the Hornets Nest) are excellent examples of how fundraising efforts have resulted in successful park improvement projects. This project is in keeping with Vision 20/20 as being an "innovative" park improvement project that will result in an "effective and valued city service by providing a sound infrastructure in a park Isetting that will lead to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construdion/Maintenanee 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 100,000 100,000 Grants & Donations 100,000 100,000 Total 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 83 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -007 Project Name Weber Park: Playground Equipment 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description This is a $200,000 project to replace the existing playground equipment at Weber Park which was installed in 1997. Justification There are 23 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system and the Weber Park equipment will be 20 years old by the year 2017. A budget of $200,000 is proposed in order to plan for a more accessible and barrier free design which is more costly due to the preferred safety surface. This project is in keeping with Vision 20/20 as being an "innovative" park improvement project that will result in an "effective and valued city service by providing a sound infrastructure in a park setting that will lead to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 84 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, NW Project a PK -13 -008 ProjectName Arden Park: Replace Shelter Building 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description This $650,000 project involves replacement of the Arden Park shelter building with a more modern design similar to the concept at Weber Park and Cornelia School Park. Justification The Arderi Park shelter building was designed and built in 1974s and no longer meets resident's needs and expectations. The community has expressed an interest in having a shelter building that is more user friendly for social gatherings and meeting spaces on a year round basis, similar to the newer shelter buildings at Weber Park and Cornelia School Park. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 650,000 650,000 Total 650,000 650,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 650,000 650,000 Total 650,000 .650,000 PROPOSED Page 85 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -13 -009 Project Name Strachauer Park: Playground Equipment 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description This is a $200,000 project to replace the existing playground equipment at Strachauer Park which was installed in 1997. Justification There are 23 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system and the Strachauer Park equipment will be almost 20 years old by the year 2016. A budget of $200,000 is proposed in order to plan for a more accessible and barrier free design which is more costly due to the preferred safety surface. This project is in keeping with Vision 20/20 as being an "innovative" park improvement project that will result in an "effective and valued city service by providing a sound infrastructure in a park setting that will lead to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These oroiects reournose aeine infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total Funding Sources 200,000 Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 200,000 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 86 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, NW Project a PK -13 =010 Project Name Parks Comprehensive Master Plan Type New Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description. This comprehensive process will involve hiring a professional consulting firm to work with neighborhood groups, Park Board, City Council and staff and will take several months to complete. Justification Developing a comprehensive master. plan for all parks addresses Edina's Vision 20/20 Plan primarily in Objective #3 which is "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability". The master plan process should result in an assessment of park and recreation, needs and how the parks should be renovated.to meet those needs. These capital investment plans will balance the need and affordability in a manner that continue to make Edina the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 PROPOSED Page 87 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina. MN Project # PK -13 -011 Project Name Park Planning and Design 2013 Ihru 2017 Type New Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority n/a Status Active Description Plan and design proposed park projects for Lake Edina Park (PK -13 -003) and Wooddale Park (PK -13 -006). It is possible the planning and design done in this project could change the scope, cost and timing of the related projects. Justification This project was included in the CIP based on a Council worksession discussion on October 2, 2012. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 PROPOSED Page 88 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital. Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -12 -002 Project Name Replace Heaters 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks -Aquatic Center Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description I . Replace the water heaters in the bath house with higher efficiency heaters. Currently, we -have two water heaters that heat water for the bath house. The expected useful life for the water heater is 10 -12 years. This was an approved 2012 CIP project that we moved to 2013. The water heaters were installed in 1997 and have exceeded the expected useful life. We had the water heaters assessed in 2011 and the recommendation was to replace in 1 -2 years. The water heater heats the water for the bath house so is essential for operations. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 PROPOSED Page 89 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -12 -003 Project Name Pool Deck Repairs 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 2 Status Active Description I teplace deteriorating concrete in sections of the pool deck and around the area near the north trellis. Justification Over the years, we have replaced deteriorating concrete in several sections. Some areas of the pool deck are still original and showing age. We are seeing more cracks each season and are concerned that the deck will become a safety issue if not replaced. We have been patching sections as needed but will eventually have to replace larger portions of the deck. In the area around the north trellis the pressure treated wood on the trellis is shrinking and splitting. Replacing the deteriorating concrete will keep the quality standards that are expected from an Edina facility. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 PROPOSED Page 90 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -12 -004 Project Name Bathhouse Roof and Other Improvements Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 2 Status Active Description Replace the bath house roof, air conditioners and concession equipment. Justification The bath house was built in 1997 and the roof is the original. We have not had any leaking but the roof is showing age and starting to wear thin. The air conditioners and concession equipment have most likely reached useful life. We do annual preventative maintenance on all of the concession equipment which has increased useful life. The convection oven, pizza spinner, and freezers are all showing signs of age and costing us more each year to maintain and repair. We generate over $124,000 in revenue from concessions so having this equipment is essential to operations. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 52,000 52,000 Total 52,000 52,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund 52,000 52,000 Total 52,000 52,000 PROPOSED Page 91 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -12 -005 Project Name Replace Pool Filters 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Aquatic Center Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 4 Status Active Description Replace the pool filters in the main pool, plunge pool, and zero depth pool. The approximate useful life on a filter is 2 -15 years. Justification Pool filters are needed to keep the pool water clean and clear. The main job of the filter is to protect the pool pump from any debris that may have been sucked into the main drain or through the skimmer. If this debris were to get into the pump, it could severely damage the motor or potentially ruin the entire unit. The filters were installed in 1997 which exceeds the approximate useful life. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 62,000 62,000 Total 62,000 62,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund 62,000 62,000 Total 62,000 62,000 PROPOSED Page 92 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project a AQC -12 -006 Project Name SCS Play Structure Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace the SCS play structure located in the zero depth pool. The play structure was installed in 1997 and is a heavily used attraction. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 2 states the City provides services that sets Edina apart from other communities. The zero depth play structure is one of the Aquatic Center's main attractions. This feature attracts people to Edina from all over the Twin Cities Metro area. It is one of the key attractions that drive gate sales. The SCS Zero Depth Pool play structure was installed in 1997 and may need to be replaced due to heavy use. Preventative maintenance has helped increased the longevity of the play structure but will need to be replaced in the next few years. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 325,000 325,000 Total 325,000 325,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund 325,000 325,000 Total 325,000 325,000 PROPOSED Page 93 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -13 -001 Project Name Main Pool Boiler 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Aquatic Center Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description I 2eplace the main pool boiler. The useful life is expected to be 10 years. Justification We have recently replaced the boilers in the plunge pool (2012) and the zero depth pool (2011). All of the boilers were originally purchased around the same time (2002). The boiler is expected to run 10 years with appropriate preventative maintenance. There is slight damage to the tube bundle. Gilbert Mechanical evaluated the condition of the boiler in August of 2012 after we closed the facility for the season. The tube bundle and burners are in very poor condition. The recommendation was to replace the boiler with a dual boiler system. We need a boiler to heat the water in the main pool. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 47,000 47,000 Total 47,000 47,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund 47,000 47,000 Total 47,000 47,000 PROPOSED Page 94 Tuesday, October l6 2012 n Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina. MN Project # AQC -13 -002 Project Name Large Slide 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace the large tube slide. The 'slide is original and was installed in 2002. This feature is heavily used and starting to show wear and tear. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 2 states the'City provides services that sets Edina apart from other communities. The slide is one of the Aquatic Center's main attractions. This feature attracts people to Edina from all over the Twin Cities Metro area. It is one of the key attractions that drive gate sales. The gel coating on the slide is wearing thin from heavy use. There is color deterioration and the surface is increasingly difficult to maintain. Replacing the slide in 2016: -Will keep us competitive with other outdoor pool facilities. - Create excitement in the community to come to the pool to use the improved slide. -Will keep the quality standards that are expected from an Edina facility. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 500,000 500,000 Total 500,000 500,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Aquatic Center Fund' 500,000 500,000 TOW 500,000 500,000 PROPOSED Page 95 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # A -10 -003 Project Name Water System Repairs Type Replace or repair Useful Life Category Buildings 2013 thru 2017 Department Parks -Arena Contact Park & Recreation Priority 5Important Status Active Description fur current water softening equipment is outdated. This project would increase energy efficiency by saving in salt and water-treatment costs. Justification majority of arenas use tap or sometimes well water to make and maintain ice. In certain regions this has been successful; however it erally results in a poor quality sheet of ice. Untreated source water contains many minerals that are added to provide safe drinking water are not conducive to the ice making and maintenance process. These same minerals migrate upwards and concentrate at the ice surface as a ilt of the freezing process. The negative effect this has on the ice surface is compounded further with each additional flood and a nomenon called 'sublimation' (where ice changes directly from a solid to a gas without first becoming a liquid). During this sublimation ;ess more minerals are deposited on the ice surface resulting in a snowy, scaly and slow ice surface. The Reverse Osmosis process is the ;t environmentally friendly method of demineralizing water. There are absolutely no chemicals and the end product is potable. The Water Systems Repairs that were included in the 2013 CIP is an item the Arena feels is important, however other projects have been identified by Braemar Arena staff as a higher priority. Therefore we are moving this project to 2015. Water treatment helps keep the scale down in the equipment which also lengthens the life span of the equipment. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 PROPOSED Page 96 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Irojcct # A -12 -001 'roject Name Replace Zamboni 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks -Arena, Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description The`'desired:useful life of a Zamboni is 10,000 hours, which'egu-ates to'about 10 years.' Braemar has historically held on to Zambonis for 13 -17 years. With the replacement of this Zamboni, our daily use fleet were purchased in 2010, 2012 and 2014.0ur "back up" machine was purchased in 2001. The next Zamboni replacement will be in 2020. This will continue to put us on a path to have reliable equipment. This machine will replace the 1997 ice resurfacing machine. Justification This is a routine equipment replacement purchase. The 1997.zamboni will be 17 years old in 2014 and is due to be replaced. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: 'Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These nroiects reouroose aeine infrastructure and allow us to urovide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 PROPOSED Page 97 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a A -12 -002 Project Name Make -up Water Tanks 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Arena Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Make Up Water Tanks are a part of the ice refrigeration system. The Make Up Water Tanks hold treated water so when the cooling towers call for water it is ready in the tank. Originally the Make Up Water Tanks were budgeted for 2015, however we need to move them up to 2013 because of a small leak in one, and the other two are also deteriorating. Our preventative maintenance company recommended replacement in 2013 due to current condition. The estimate has also been decreased with more accurate bids. Justification This equipment is critical for the Ice Refrigeration system. The water that is leaking is treated, which means we are also losing chemicals when losing water. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These oroiects replace aline infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 35,000 35,000 TOW 35,000 35,000 PROPOSED Page 98 Tuesday, October l6. 20/2 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a A -13 -001 Project Name Low .E Ceiling Replacement - West Arena 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks- Arena Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 4 Status Active Description Low E Ceiling is panels that are hung the width of the "sheet of ice. The intent of the Low E Ceiling is to provide energy efficiency,. the space and provide a more - appealing look. It has a life expectancy of approximately 20 years. Justification I The Low E Ceiling installed in the West Arena is falling down. Last season we needed to remove 2 of the panels because they were hanging down and pucks were getting stuck in them. Since the West Arena is our main rink for high school games, figure skating show, and large special events, it is important to replace them as soon as possible. The Low E Ceiling panels were installed in 1994. The West Arena went through a major renovation in 2010 and will receive some other valuable improvements as a part of the Hornets Nest project in 2012. This will complete urgent repairs. The estimated annual savings is $17,000 per year. (Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: I "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equip/Vehicles /Fumishings 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 PROPOSED Page 99 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # A -13 -002 Project Name Painting East Arena Type Replace or repair Useful Life Category Buildings 2013 thru 2017 Department Parks -Arena Contact Park & Recreation Priority 4 Status Active Description Painting East Arena. The East Arena is known as the "barn" at Braemar. The grey concrete blocks make the arena the least desirable. We have received multiple requests from both our figure skating and hockey community to paint the space to make it more welcoming. The East Arena was enclosed in 1987. There have been very few improvements made to the space since that time. Justification will help meet the goal of making Braemar Arena the premier facility. The East Arena is also where we see the most vandalism. If we iten the space and make it more desirable, it will receive less vandalism. 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. )roiects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total Funding Sources 25,000 Prior 2013 2014 25,000 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 100 Tuesday, October /6. 20/2 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a A -13 -003 Project Name Ballet Room Remodel 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Parks -Arena Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description The Ballet room'is located between the East and the South Arenas. The Ballet room was constructed in 1998.: For the past 14 years the Ballet room has been used for the Figure Skating Club. The Arena is opening up the space for multi - purpose use. We will schedule Birthday Parties, team meetings, facilitate dance class_ es and other fitness classes for our guests. The room is need of significant updates and improvements to the floor, walls, window` coverings, furniture and other media components. This will increase fee based use of the space. Justification Braemar Arena has had a goal of providing a high quality on ice experience for our guests. While that is our primary responsibility, we also seek to improve other areas of the facility to increase revenues. We are only estimating $5,000 per year in additional revenues, however this space will be used by tournament coordinators. The Minnesota Hockey Advanced 15's is an example of one tournament that would utilize this space. We are currently negotiating a 5 year contract. This tournament will generate $8,100 per year. They plan to use this space for coaches and scouts visiting from around the country. 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. )roiects repurvose a¢ina infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 101 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # A -13 -004 Project Name Low E Ceiling Replacement - East Arena 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks -Arena Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Low E Ceiling are panels that are strung the width of the sheet of ice. They intent of the Low E Ceiling is to provide energy efficiencies, brighten the space and provide a more appealing look. The Low E Ceiling installed in the East Arena is falling down. For the visual appeal, as well as providing energy efficiencies this project has been included on the CIP and included for 2015. Justification The East Arena Low E Ceiling Replacement is due for replacement in 2014. The estimated annual energy savings is $17,000 per year. The replacement of the torn panels also improves the aesthetics of the arena. Vision 20/20, Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 PROPOSED Page 102 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project tt A -13 -005 Project name Bathroom/Locker Room Upgrades/Remodel Type Replace or repair Useful Life Category Buildings 8 2013 /hru 2017 Department Parks -Arena Contact Park & Recreation Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project will remodel the West 1 and West 2 locker room rest rooms. Justification Many of the bathrooms /locker rooms in Braemar Arena are outdated. They receive significant use on a daily basis and are in need of upgrades and improvements. The project will include re- tiling, new partitions, counter tops, and mirrors. It will also make our lower East restrooms accessible. Currently there are two stalls that are not accessible. The floors are rubber and are difficult to clean. Tiling the floors with skate safe rubber matting would be best. As the facility ages, it is important for us to continue to improve the Arena. Currently the upper West, lower East, lower West and lower South are all needed. The West 1 and West 2 locker rooms are also in need of significant improvements. These are very visible to our users and we need to continue to invest in the improvement of our facilities. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These vroiects revurpose aaine infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 100,000 lo0,000 Total 100,000 100,000 PROPOSED Page 103 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # A -13 -006 Project Name Rubber Floor Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Arena Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description The East and South Arenas need new Rubber Flooring. The replacement would be in the main areas= lower tunnel corridors, locker rooms and players benches/penalty boxes. The rubber floor allows for players to walk throughout the lower level of the facility with their skates on. The rubber flooring throughout the South and East Arenas was installed in 1997. Previously the East Arena only lasted for 10 years and currently the flooring is 15 years old. The flooring for the West arena and locker rooms was replaced in 2010. The flooring is wearing out in high traffic areas and becomes difficult to clean with our floor scrubber. Justification This project provides for ongoing maintenance and upkeep of Braemar Arena. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects re purpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 PROPOSED Page 104 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # A -13 -007 Project Name Arena Roof 2013 rhru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Arena Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description I. . The current roof was installed in 1996..It is a rubber membrane roof with -rock ballast. With improvements made in 2012, we'were able:to increase the life of the roof by 5 years. In 2017 the roof will have well exceeded its expected life of 15 -18 years. We will be replacing the roof over the main lobby, South Arena, and the East lobby. It is recommended to again replace the roof with the rubber membrane and rock. Since our roof has-been installed, there have been significant improvements in this product and it was recommended by two contractors. Justification The roof has exceeded its life and is in need of replacement. Currently there are minimal leaks throughout the facility. In 2017 the roof will be 21 years old, far exceeding the 15 -18 year expected life. Vision 20/20, Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction /Maintenance 225,000 225,000 Total 225,000 225,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 225,000 225,000 Total 225,000 225,000 PROPOSED Page 105 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # A -13 -008 Project Name Parking Lot Resurfacing Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Arena Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 2 Status Active Description This project is to resurface the lower level parking lot near the south arena. The parking lot was installed in 1997 and has not been resurfaced since. It was recommended by the City of Edina engineering department to resurface this lot to avoid more significant repairs in the future. Justification The existing asphalt is deteriorated and at the end of its life. Will avoid more expensive repairs in the future if we resurface in 2013. Vision 20/20, Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects replace aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 PROPOSED Page 106 Tuesday, October 16. 20/2 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ART -11 -004 Project Name Parking Lot Expansion 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Parks -Art Center Useful Life Contact Category Parks Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description In May 2009, the Edina Engineering Department requested companies to provide bids to remove bituminous pavement and concrete sidewalk and install new curb and-gutter' and. re-pave a newly designed entry and exit system for the Edina Art Center Parking Lot. The bids were in response to a plan to change the Art Center parking lot from a single entry/exit driveway to a dual entry/exit system. In addition, expansion of the Art Center parking lot'was proposed with 10 additional parking spaces. The dual entry/exit system would increase safety for persons and vehicular property. Bids from the Engineering Department came in at $25,811.25, with bids from other companies coming in at $361082.50/ $37,467:50/ $42,597:501 $36,328.75./ $33,210.50. These figures from May 27, 2009. I am unable to locate information_ regarding the $85,000 amount request. Useful life is 20+ years. Lines were repainted in March 2012, and are slowly fading. We need painted lines to designate where cars should be parked to optimize the area. Replacement, and concrete repair and replacement for access sidewalks. Justification 'reation of dual entry/exit driveways and expansion of parking lot with 10 new spots and redesign drop off area would allow for larger >atronage usage and allow for easier customer access to the Edina Art Center. A major factor in the re- design is for the safety of patrons of the enter. During openings and receptions, attendees must park along the poorly lit frontage road and walk to the Center. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014. 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 PROPOSED Page 107 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ART -11 -005 Project Name HVAC Type Replace or repair Useful Life 20 years Category Buildings Description 2013 thru 2017 Department Parks - Art Center Contact Priority 3 Significant Status Active The Edina Art Center HVAC system is comprised of one boiler, 5 roof top units and one famace. The boiler on the lower level is 14 years old, was installed in 1998 and has a life expectancy of 25 -30 years. The average life of the roof top heating/cooling units is 15 years. Two units are made by York; one installed in 2001 and one in 2002 and are 11 and 10 years old respectively. The remaining three units, two roof top units and one furnace, were made by Carrier and installed in 1998 with the recent addition of the Media Studios. These three units are 14 years old with an average life of 15 years. The ductless split which serves the upper level, or Loft, of the Art Center was installed in 2011 and is less than one year old. Price of the roof top units needing to be replaced in the next year or more is estimated to be between $7,000 - $8,000 per unit, but can go as high as $10,000 per unit with the variance in price due to the cost of metal at time of purchase. Justification 2013 would be the scheduled replacement of roof top HVAC Carrier systems over the Media Studios at the end of the 15 year life expectancy. The replacement of the HVAC units, upgrade of the ventilation and exhaust systems would be in line with the Comprehensive Plan as a necessity for heating and cooling of the building and comfort of the patrons. In addition, appropriate management of health and safety issues and hazardous material management for participants and visitors is a top priority for a high quality center. Vision 20/20 speaks to the quality of services and quality of life the city provides to its residents. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 22,800 22,800 Total 22,800 22,800 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 22,800 22,800 Total 22,800 22,800 PROPOSED Page 108 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # ART -13 -001 Project Name Ma %Solutions Enterprise Acquisition 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department NarxS -Art Center Useful Life 11- 20years Contact Category Equipment Priority 2 Status Active DOc_ription Acquisition of MaxSolutions Enterprise software, terminal and training for Art Center staff. Technology update for Art Center for memberships, point of sale, registration, and reporting. Justification Alignment with Art Center Consultant study and Art Center work plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000 15,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 15,000 15,000 TOW 15,000 15,000 PROPOSED Page 109 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL -06 -005 Project Name Replace HVAC Units 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 2 Status Active Description Replace 2 of the 4 HVAC units for the Centennial Lakes Pavillion. The current heating and air conditioning units were installed in 1990 and are reaching the end of their life expectancy. Newer units will also be more energy efficient than our current models, allowing us to save on energy costs. Justification New HVAC units will help maintain the interior building at comfortable temperatures for special event clients and other park users. A Sound Public Infrastructure is listed as part of the City Vision Statement; replacement of these HVAC units will align with this goal. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These vroiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 110 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL-09 -008 Project Name Replace Park Sound System 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description The sound system for the Centennial Lakes pathways currently consist of over 160 in- ground speakers, eight pole- mounted speakers, -and 10 trnplifiers, all connected by several miles of low voltage wire. The majority of this system was installed in 1999 with an anticipated useful life 3f 810, years. The system allows us to play music throughout the park for the enjoyment of park patrons as well as make announcements as seeded. We or000se to reolace all necessary components of the system with new comoonents. Justification The park music system is a unique amenity that is important in establishing Centennial Lakes as a premier public facility, which aligns with the Vision 20/20 mission statement. Walking trails were identified as extremely important to Edina residents in the 2006 Community Attitudes and Interest survey. A properly functioning sound system will enhance the park walkways for walkers and runners alike. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 200- Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 32,000 32,000 Total 32,000 32,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 32,000 32,000 Total 32,000 32,000 PROPOSED Page 111 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL -12 -001 Project Name Replace HVAC Units 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace 2 of the four HVAC units for the Centennial Lakes Pavilion. (The other two units are scheduled for replacement in 2014.) current heating and air conditioning units were installed in 1990 and are nearing the end of their life expectancy. Newer units will be enerev efficient than our current models. allowine us to save on enerev costs as well as reduce maintenance exnense. Justification Jew HVAC units will help maintain the building interior at comfortable temperatures for special event clients and other park users. A Sound 3ublic Infrastructure is listed as part of the City Vision Statement; replacement of these HVAC units will align with this goal. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 112 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 hil Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL -13 -001 Project Name One -Ton Truck 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Vehicles Priority 5Important Status Active Description Our current one -ton truck will be 20 years old in 2017 and in need of replacement. The one -ton truck, which has beefed up suspension and a heavy duty steel dump box, is used to haul out all of the organic material and debris from the care and maintenance of the plants, trees and grass areas at Centennial Lakes Park. Since we have no dumping area for these types of items at. Centennial Lakes, all of this material is trucked over to the main City dump site at Braemar. In addition, it is used to haul mulch, soil and landscane materials back into the nark. Justification k reliable vehicle will help in our efforts to provide a premier public facility as desired by the Vision 20/20 mission statement. 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equip/Vehicles /Furnishings 28,000 28,000 Total 28,000 - 28,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 28,000 28,000 Total 28,000 28,000 PROPOSED Page 113 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -00 -017 Project Name Replaster Pool 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description Re- plaster and restore pool shell at Edinborough Park. The pool shell is the original constructed in 1987. Justification I Edina parks and facilities are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The pool needs an update to be considered a premier Edina facility. The original pool shell at Edinborough Park is cracked and badly discolored. Pieces of plaster are coming off of the shell. The pool shell needs a new surface coat of gunite, sprayed applied concrete. Our goal at Edinborough Park is to increase usage of the pool. It is essential to have a comparable pool with other providers in the area. Failure to make this repair will cause cracking or heaving of the pool shell which could compromise the structural integrity. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 71,800 71,800 TOW 71,800 71,800 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 71,800 71,800 Total 71,800 71,800 PROPOSED Page 114 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN ,Project # EP -08 -007 Project Name Security Camera System 2,013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Install a new web based security camera-system with the ability for video surveillance. Included in the system are "cameras, DVR and monitors. The useful life is anticipated'to be 10 years. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 7 states to evaluate and efficiently employ technological advancements to provide City services. The current system was installed in 2006 and has many. limitations. A more efficient system would allow us remote access to view the park, maintain a safe environment for the public, and view clear images of the facility. This system is being used effectively at the Aquatic Center and Public Works buildings. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future, Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 43,100 43,100 Total 43,100 43,100 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 43,100 43,100 Total 43,100 43,100 PROPOSED Page 115 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -08 -021 Project Name Pool and Wall Tile 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description I Replace the tile on the walls of the pool along with the deck tile. The tile is original to the park and was installed in 1987. Justification I Edina parks and facilities are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The pool needs an update to be considered a premier Edina facility. The deck and wall tile is original to the park over 26 years old. There are several cracked and damaged pieces along the east wall, and buckled tile along the north wall. We have replaced several larger areas of deck tile that are discolored. The wall tile is fractured n several areas and could potentially become a safety issue. Our goal is to increase usage of the facility with a strong focus on the pool. 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. )roiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 189,500 189,500 Total 189,500 189,500 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Edinborough Fund 189,500 189,500 Total 189,500 189,500 PROPOSED Page 116 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -09 -014 ProjectName Lift to Birthday Party Area 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Parks - EdiAorough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description Lift from,the great hall floor to the Birthday Party Plateau - the old tot lot area. Justification This area was not designed to be handicapped accessible. We are currently providing two other birthday party sites in different locations with accessibility. We are receiving an increased number of requests for handicapped accessible areas in the park. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 42,000 42,000 Total 42,000 42,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 42,000 42,000 Total 42,000 42,000 PROPOSF,D Page 117 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -09 -015 Project Name Track Floor 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description Replace the track floor with a similar rubber surface. The useful life is anticipated to be 20 years. Justification na parks and facilities are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The Parks and Recreation Facilities and Services Needs essment Survey confirmed that having indoor exercise facilities and an indoor running /walking track is important to the residents of Edina. track surface was originally installed in 1987. The track has experienced significant wear over the years. Portions of the track surface wearing thin causing potential tripping hazards. The current surface is a deterrent to many people. Improving the surface of the track will us achieve our goal of increasing usage of the facility. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 65,000 65,000 Total 65,000 65,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 65,000 65,000 Total 65,000 65,000 PROPOSED Page 118 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -09 -016 Project Name Concrete repairs 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description Repair deteriorated concrete on west sidewalk as well as concrete and drain tile near the parking ramp entrance. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 1 states the City maintain strong residential neighborhoods. Maintaining and improving the condition of our neighborhood street and sidewalks is essential. Concrete on the west sidewalk is deteriorating and may become a tripping hazard. This sidewalk is used by many residents accessing the park and other businesses located in the Corporate Center. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. :ly, in the parking ramp entrance we have water seeping into the entryway, loading dock entrance, and hallway underneath. Concrete would prevent further deterioration and damage. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 153,800 153,800 Total 153,800 153,800 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 153,800 153,800 Total -153,800 153,800 PROPOSED Page 119 Tuesday,. October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -09 -021 Project Name Adventure Peak Remodel 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description I Replace worn events on Adventure Peak. The useful life on most of the events varies depending on use and materials, but most events last less than 10 years. Adventure Peak opened in 2004. Justification I Adventure Peak brings in approximately $600,000 a year in revenue for Edinborough Park. We have one of the largest and most used play structures in the country. Replacing the worn events is critical for maintaining the safety of the play structure. Replacing the events will also refresh the look of the structure and keep it fun and exciting for the enjoyment of our customers. New play structures are opening all over the Twin Cities and it's critical that we continue to renew and modify the play structure to maintain interest and customer base. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 26,000 26,000 Total 26,000 26,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 26,000 26,000 Total 26,000 26,000 PROPOSED Page 120 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -10 -011 Project Name North Sidewalk 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department. Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replace . the deteriorating concrete on the sidewalks on the North side of the facility. The concrete is original to the park and was poured in 1987. The useful life on concrete is approximately 20 years but varies depending on use, weight and weather. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective l states the City maintain strong residential neighborhoods. Maintaining and improving the condition of our neighborhood streefand sidewalks is essential. The concrete on the North sidewalk is deteriorating and may become a tripping hazard: This sidewalk is used by many residents living in the condos to access the park and businesses in the Corporate Center. Over the years, we have patched several sections and even those sections are starting to crumble. Replacing the concrete would decrease the tripping hazard. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 32,300 32,300 Total 32,300 1. 32,300 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 32,300 32,300 Tom 32,300 32,300 PROPOSED Page 121 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina. MN Project # EP -11 -005 Project Name Track Air Conditioning 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description Odd air conditioning to the track and exercise area. The useful life is anticipated to be 10 years. Justification ly, there is no air conditioning in the track area. The track is surrounded by windows that cannot be opened. During the summer temperatures can exceed 90 degrees. Exercising at these temperatures can become a safety and health issue for anyone, especially The addition of air conditioning to the track will make the facility a more appealing alternative for the community to enjoy year round. ision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: 'rovide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. hese nroiects reoumose acing infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 66,600 66,600 Total 66,600 66,600 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 66,600 66,600 Total 66,600 66,600 PROPOSED Page 122 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -006 Project Name Adventure Peak Wave Slide 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description 2eplace the triple wave slide on Adventure Peak. The useful life is anticipated to be 10 -12 years. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 2 states the City provides services that sets Edina apart from other communities. Adventure Peak brings in approximately $600,000 a year in revenue for Edinborough Park. We have one of the largest and most used play structures in the area. Each year thousands of children play in Adventure Peak. Adventure Peak attracts people to Edina from all over the Twin Cities metro. The slide is an original play feature and is wearing out. The coating on the slide is wearing thin from heavy use. There is color deterioration and the surface is increasingly difficult to maintain. In order to continue to attract large numbers of users, it is important to continually renew and -update the play structure. Our guests notice and appreciate the investment. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 26,300 26,300 Total 26,300 26,300 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 26,300 26,300 Total 26,300 26,300 PROPOSED Page 123 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -007 Project Name Exterior Entryway Doors 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description The exterior doors are the original doors installed when the park first opened in 1987. They are over 25 years old and have become difficult to lock. The interior components of the doors are also deteriorating and have become expensive to repair. New doors would also be much more enerav efficient. Justification is parks and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The exterior doors are the first thing people see n they enter Edinborough Park. The doors are original to the park and have corroded components. The doors do not lock well which could It in safety issues inside the park. The doors are difficult to open which is a challenge for kids and older adults. The doors are discolored look poorly to the public using the park. One of our goals is to increase usage of the facility. We are updating the look of the facility by wing overgrown trees and filling in the Grotto. Replacing the doors will create a positive first impression of the facility. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction /Maintenance 90,500 90,500 Total 90,500 90,500 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 90,500 90,500 Total 90,500 90,500 PROPOSED Page 124 Tuesday, October l6. 20/2 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -008 Project Name Interior Entryway Doors Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important , Status Active Description The interior doors are the original doors installed when the park first opened in 1987. It is my recommendation to replace the interior lockable doors on all four entrances to the park. JustiScation Edina parks and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The interior doors are the. first thing people see when they enter Edinborough Park. The doors are original to the park and have corroded components causing instability. New doors would be much more'energy efficient. The doors are faded and do not represent the image that we want to portray to our guests. In 2017, Edinborough Park will be 30 years old. Our goal is to update the look of the facility and replacing the interior doors will help us achieve that goal. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 67,900 67,900 Total 67,900 67,900 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund Total PROPOSED Page 125 67,900 67,900 67,900 67,900 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -009 Project Name Upstairs Restroom Remodel 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 6 Status Active Description enovate and remodel the upstairs restrooms at Edinborough Park. The useful life is anticipated to be 15 -18 years. Justification parks and facilities are the essential components of the foundation of our city. I recommend replacing the tile, countertops, lighting s, and toilet partitions. These are heavily used restrooms and are showing their age. The tile is chipping in certain areas and could be a concern. The restroom facilities look very outdated and do not represent the quality that is expected from an Edina facility. 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. )roiects reouroose aeine infrastructure and allow us to urovide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 30,800 30,800 Total 30,800 30,800 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 30,800 30,800 Total 30,800 30,800 PROPOSED Page 126 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project a EP -11 -010 Project Name Adventure Peak Renovation Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park &Recreation Category Equipment Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replacement of deck pads and thick foam pipe covering throughout Adventure Peak. Adventure Peak was built in 2003 and the foam pipe covering is original and is starting to wear out and tear due to heavy use. Justification I Each year thousands of children play in Adventure Peak. Adventure Peak attracts people to Edina from all over the Twin Cities metro area. Exterior foam and soft deck pads wear out with use. The thick foam padding covers all of the structural piping throughout Adventure Peak. Kids hang on and bump into the pads. Replacing deck pads and foam pipe covering is essential to maintaining safety standards on the Peak. Edinborough Park has a reputation in the community to be a safe facility for families to enjoy. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: 'Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These Droiects reouroose aeine infrastructure and allow us to Drovide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 33,100 33,100 Total 33,100 33,100 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 33,100 33,100 Total 33,100 33,100 PROPOSED Page 127 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN "roject # EP -12 -003 "roject Name Park Boiler 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description I Replace the main park boiler at Edinborough Park. The boiler provides heat to most of the park including the entryways, locker rooms, pool and track. The useful life on a boiler is approximately 10 years. Justification The main park boiler was installed in 2004. The boiler provides heat to most of the areas in the park. By 2015, we will have surpassed the useful life of an average boiler. Providing heat in the facility would be necessary for us to operate during the months we experience colder weather. Vision 20/20, Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 26,900 26,900 Total 26,900 26,900 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 26,900 26,900 Total 26,900 26,900 PROPOSED Page 128 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 /hru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # EP -13 -001 Project Name POS System Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 5Important Status Active Description Implement.a'new Point of Sale system with the ability to manage aspects of daily operations in the park. The current Point of Sale system was installed in 2006. The useful life is anticipated to be 10 years. Justification Vision 20/20 Objective 7 states the City evaluates and efficiently employ technological advancements to provide City services. Implementing a new Point of Sale system will bring more efficiency to accessing information to improve daily operations. The benefits include: - Improved customer tracking - Billing and receivables - Facility scheduling - Marketing tools, reporting, etc Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 28,300 28,300 Total 28,300 28,300 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 28,300 28,300 Total 28,300 28,300 PROPOSED Page 129 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project 4 EP -13 -002 Project Name Ramp to Track 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Add a ramp to access the track and exercise area. Currently, an individual who wants to use the track must go up a minimum of four stairs, limiting access for individuals using a walker, wheelchair, or have other physical limitations. Justification I 'urrently, the track is not handicapped accessible. The ramp is needed to make the track and exercise area handicapped accessible to allow note people to utilize the track and exercise area. For Edinborough Park to increase the cost recovery percentage to 90-100% we will need to nake updates to the facility to accommodate all user groups. Many people utilizing the track are individuals living in the Condos and in Park 'laza both with aging residents. By adding the ramp to access the track, we will provide an inclusive opportunity for all residents to utilize. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 41,000 41,000 Total 41,000 41,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 41,000 41,000 Total 41,000 41,000 PROPOSFD Page 130 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement. Plan City of Edina, MN Project# EP -13 -003 Project Name Provide Larger Locker Rooms Type Expansion Useful Life Category Buildings 2013 thru 2017 Department Parks - Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description - Renovate and expand both the men's and women's locker rooms. The locker rooms are original to the park and have always been significantly undersized for the needs of our customers. We would convert a storage area to create a new locker room.- The result would be doubling the size of both locker rooms. The lockers rooms are original to the park. We continually receive feedback that the locker rooms are too small to accommodate our customers. The locker rooms can comfortably accommodate 8 -10 people, with the dressing areas only able to accommodate 4 or 5. We have water exercise classes with over 18 participants. The Edina Swim Club has over twenty kids in some levels that will need the locker rooms. We have entered into an agreement with the Edina Swim Club to be the home of their club, hosting approximately 4 hours of practice time daily, a minimum of five days /week. Our goal is to increase the cost recovery percentage for Edinborough Park to 90 -100 %. To accomplish this goal it's essential we increase usage of the facility thus requiring adequate facilities to accommodate our customers. Expanding the locker rooms would enable us to accomplish the following, resulting in increased revenue: - Update the look of the locker room facilities to appeal to the public - Improve the comfort of the locker rooms by improving air quality and water drainage - Accommodate larger groups - rentals, group reservations and/or birthday parties -Offer additional programming opportunities - water zumba, zumba, yoga, etc. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These proiects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 582,000 582,000 Total 582,000 582,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2.014 2015 2016 2017 Future. Total' Edinborough Fund 582,000 582,000 Total 582,000 y 582,000 PROPOSED Page 131 Tuesday,'Ocrober l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina. MN Project # EP -13 -004 Project Name Window Washing 2013 rhru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description Wash the interior and exterior windows in the park. There are several areas in the facility that we do not have access to with our current ; quipment. Several of the windows in the park have never been washed due to access issues. Justification I :dina parks and facilities are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The windows in certain areas have not been cleaned in wenty five years. There are several interior windows that we cannot reach with current equipment. This project would require special equipment and personnel which explains the high cost. In order to keep the aesthetic appeal of the facility it is recommended that the windows )e cleaned. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 26,300 26,300 Total 26,300 26,300 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 26,300 26,300 Total 16,300 26,300 PROPOSED Page 132 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a EP -13 -005 Project Name Roof Repairs 2013 /hru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Make all necessary repairs to` eliminate water leaks in'the Park. This includes roof repairs and also window glazing replacement::. The windows and "glazing are original to thepark. :Justification Edinborough Park is twenty six years old. It is recommended to make the necessary improvements to the roof. With steady rain we have several areas throughout the park where water is leaking into the facility from the windows and/or roof. Over the years, we have seen an increase in the number of leaks causing more damage to the facility. The location of some of the leaks presents safety concerns for possible slipping when the public is in the park. Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 110,400 110,400 TOW 110,400 110,400 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 110,400 110,400 Total 110,400 110,400 PROPOSED Page 133 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -005 Project Name Driving Range Expansion Type Expansion Useful Life Category Parks Description 2013 thru 2017 Department Parks - Golf Course Contact Park & Recreation Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Expansion of Driving Range increasing depth and width. The benefits of expansion are increased capacity for peak times, improved turf quality, and eliminating safety concerns of customers being hit by golf balls while on the Executive Course and "teaching tee ". The expansion would include talking the current second and third holes of the Executive Course as part the Driving Range. The two current Par 4's would turn into four Par 3's makine the Executive Course (now Par 29) into a Par 3 Course (Par 27). Justification this was the top priority for CIP improvements by the National Golf Foundation consultant report. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) •eport also confirms justification: "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are 'living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. xoiects reouroose aeine infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning /Design Construction /Maintenance 75,000 925,000 75,000 925,000 Total Funding Sources Prior 75,000 2013 2014 925,000 2015 2016 1,000,000 2017 Future Total Construction Fund Grants & Donations - Braemar 75,000 650,000 275,000 650,000 350,000 Total 75,000 925,000 1,000,000 PROPOSED Page 134 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -006 -- Project Name Braemar: Carpeting 2013 Ihru 2017 usetul Ltte w years Contact rarK R xecreanon Category Buildings Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description Replace carpeting in Pro Shop and lower level. Useful life 10 years. Justification Replacement needed to keep facility up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. In strategic alignment with Edina's mission statement to "offer premier public facilities" and Edina's Vision 20/20 Section 2.2 Vision and Goals of A Sound Public Infrastructure "Edina streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathin " assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 135 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -007 Project Name Braemar: Slit Drainage 3 Fairways 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Parks -Golf Course Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description Slit drainage for fairways will create better surface drainage effectively eliminating the need for cart paths in high traffic areas. This will also improve turf quality playability. The process creates small trenches that are filled with sand to improve drainage with minimal disruption. The effective life 10 -15 years. Justification I The National Golf Foundation's consultant report recommended to improve the cart path system while improving turf quality/playability. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification: "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system ". Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These oroiects renumose aeine infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 PROPOSED Page 136 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -008 Project Name Braemar: Clubhouse Roof Replacement Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Golf Course Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Buildings Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replacement of Clubhouse and`.Pro Shop roof consisting of flat roof and cedar shake areas. The useful life is 20+ years. A number of repairs have been performed over the years, with areas of the roof still leaking. Areas of the roof are over 25 years old. This project would: -Avoid additional ongoing repair costs - Reduce exposure of potential water damage to building, equipment, and merchandise Justification Jecessary to keep building up to acceptable standards. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 80,000 80,000 160,000 Total 80,000 80,000 160,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017' Future Total Construction Fund 80,000 80,000 160,000 Total 80,000 60,000 160,000 PROPOSED Page 137 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -009 Project Name Cart Path Repair /Expansion 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Parks -Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description Repair /replace existing asphalt and gravel/class 5 cart paths. Expand some asphalt cart paths in addition to gravel/class 5 paths which when combined with improved drainage in some fairway areas would effectively create a "wall to wall" cart path system which would allow cart usage after heavy rains without the ongoing repair /replacement costs of "wall to wall' asphalt paths. Justification This was the second highest ranked CIP recommendation for Braemar Golf Courses by the National Golf Foundation's consultant report. In strategic alignment with Edina's mission statement to "offer premier public facilities" and Edina's Vision 20/20 Section 2.2 Vision and Goals of a sound public infrastructure "Edina streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification: NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 75,000 75,000 200,000 Total 25,000 25,000 75,000 75,000 200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 75,000 75,000 200,000 Total 25,000 25,000 75,000 75,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 138 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -13 -001 Project Name Maintenance Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Golf Course Useful Life 11 -20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Priority 5Important Status Active Replacement of maintenance equipment such as mowers, utility vehicles, and sand pros on an as- needed basis. The equipment has a useful life 10 -15 years. Replacement of equipment as needed will increase help improve course conditions, reduce labor and repair costs, in addition to maintaining good trade -in values of used equipment. Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system ". 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: le capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. 3roiects reouroose aQine infrastructure and allow us to Drovide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 615,000 Total 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 615,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 615,000 Total 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 615,000 PROPOSED Page 139 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -13 -003 Project Name Tee Renovation 2013 thru 2017 Type Expansion Department Parks - Golf Course Useful Life 20 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 4 Status Active Description Renovating existing tee areas including improving soil quality, leveling, and utilizing heartier newer strains of turf. Some new tees areas will also be as needed. Many of the existing tees have become uneven and the soils have compacted over time. The effective life is 20 years. Justification The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification: "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system ". Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose a in infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 50,000 70,000 100,000 220,000 Total 50,000 70,000 100,000 220,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 50,000 70,000 100,000 220,000 Total 50,000 70,000 100,000 220,000 PROPOSED Page 140 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, NW Project # GC -13 -004 Project Name Irrigation System Replacement Phase 1 Type Replace or repair Department Parks - Golf Course Useful Life 30 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Parks Priority 5Important Status Active Description Replacement of Irrigation system (installed in 1980). This is the first of three planned phases. The useful life is 30+ years. A new system will reduce ongoing repair and -labor costs, improve course conditions, and be mote efficient and environmentally friendly. Justification" This was a recommendation for Braemar Golf Courses by the National Golf Foundation's consultant report. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system ". Vision 20/20, Objective 2 states: "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities" and Objective 3 states: "Provide capital investments that balance need and affordability" and the Comprehensive Plan discusses maintaining Park infrastructure. These projects repurpose aging infrastructure and allow us to provide a level of service that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintemnce 1,500,000 1,500,000 Total 1,500,000 1,500,000 . Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 1,500,000 1,500,000 Total 1,500,000 1,500,000 PROPOSED Page 141 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 City of Edina, MN Project # PS -11 -005 Project Name Police to Community Software Type New Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description This enhancement to our software suite will enable our agency to utilize the internet to host a portal for citizens to retrieve, enter and print reports. This browser -based solution provides a convenient means for citizens to perform simple searches, download reports and complete applications online. Citizens can search accident reports, view the daily bulletin, view missing persons, view the agency's event calendar, agency announcements and enter basic, non-emergency incident reports. Justification P2C (Police To Citizen) enhances accessibility, engages citizens with the agency and provides citizens with convenient access to public information. Additionally, this module will simplify operations, increase efficiency and reduce workload. In 2011, officers spent 708 hours responding to and taking theft reports alone. The entry of even half of those reports by citizens using P2C will increase the time officers are on the street and available for higher priority events. Other reports suitable for P2C include abandoned vehicles, lost property, property damage and traffic complaints. Providing citizens with the means to search and print copies of reports will free records technicians for more critical and beneficial tasks. The acquisition of the P2C module aligns with Objective #7 of Edina Vision 20/20 and is also part of the Police Department's Work Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 PROPOSED Page 142 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # PS -12 -007 3roject Name PD Alarm Billing Software 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description The Cry Wolf sofitware and interface automates the documentation, processing and billing of alarm calls. The two -way interface exports false alarm call information and billing data from our Computer Aided Dispatch system (CAD) when alarm calls are generated and dispatched. Additionally, the program builds and imports accurate and detailed premise information into CAD, enhancing officer and citizen safety. We.currently use an outdated data -entry program (Access) requiring redundant documentation of alarm calls. With an average of over 2400 alarm calls annually, the Cry Wolf software interface will reduce the amount of time spent by officers, dispatchers and support staff on alarm tracking and billing. Additionally, this interface will improve billing accuracy, enabling us to maximize revenue in this area Justification This program would eliminate redundant data -entry for billing purposes. Integrated reports allow for easy tracking of outstanding invoices, repeat offenders and locations with multiple alarms on the same date. Additionally the program maps alarm patterns to determine problem areas. In the event the City adopts an alarm registration/permit program, CryWolf automatically tracks registered and unregistered locations, potentially saving hundreds of clerical hours. Using current technology to increase efficiency and maximize revenue is aligned with Objective #7 of Edina Vision 20/20. In addition, the acouisition of this interface is part of the Police Department Work Plan. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 PROPOSED Page 143 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -008 Project Name PD License Plate Reader 2013 Ihru 2017 Type New Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Priority 5Important Status Active Description , icense Plate Recognition (LPR) is an image - processing technology used to identify vehicles by their license plates. This technology is used. in ✓arious security and traffic applications. It is available to "add on" to our current "in -car" video system. The camera finds and initiates license )late checks without the officer taking their eyes of the road and hands off the steering wheel. the LPR's significant advantage is that the system can keep an image record of the vehicle which is useful in order to fight crime and fraud. Phis is innovative technology that would assist the police department in locating stolen vehicles; vehicles wanted in other crimes; persons with ,varrants; and non -valid drivers. It is like having a second officer in the car to complete the computer work needed to "run" license plates in he computer. My recommendation is we ourchase two mobile units. The averaee life exoectancv of a LPR is five vears. I Justification I The reason why the police department would like to purchase several LPR units is because it follows Edina's 20/20 Vision plan. The 20/20 Vision plan talks about innovation and providing technological resources that improve the quality of life for the residences. LPR will provide innovative technology to reduce crime and apprehend violators. Objective #2 in the 20/20 Vision states, "Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities." Currently very few of our surrounding cities have implemented LPR technology. With integrating LPR technology into Edina's patrol fleet, it will set us apart as a Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 PROPOSED Page 144 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # - pS -13 -001 Project Name Fire Department Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Fire Department Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment rep] acement4chedule. The Fire department's equipment list includes passenger vehicles, fire ticks, ambulances and'rescue equipment, among other items. We estimate the useful life of this equipment to be around 6 years for an ambulance up to about 20 years for a fire truck. The Fire department also maintains a network of warning sirens located around the city. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 475,000 154,000 273,000 165,000 95,000 1,162,000 Total 475,000 154,000 273,000 165,000 95,000 1,162,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 475,000 154,000 273,000 260,000 1,162,000 Total 475,000 154,000 273,000 260,000 1,162,000 PROPOSED Page 145 Tuesday, Ocro&er 162012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# PS -13 -002 Project Name Police Department Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Police department has squad cars, dispatch and communications equipment, and software included on their equipment replacement list. The useful lives of these items ranges from 3 years for a squad car up to 10 or even 15 years for some of the dispatch and communications equipment. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 251,916 923,345 448,925 24,760 10,000 1,658,946 Total 251,916 923,345 448,925 24,760 10,000 1,658,946 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 251,916 923,345 448,925 24,760 10,000 1,658,946 TOW 251,916 923,345 448,925 24,760 10,000 1,658,946 PROPOSED Page 146 Tuesday, October l6 2012 i Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project s PS -13 -003 ProjectName Inspections Division Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Fire Department Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Inspections division has several passenger vehicles used to get Inspectors to various work sites around the City. These vehicles have an estimated useful life of 10 years. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 15,000 18,000 60,000 93,000 Total 15,000 18,000 60,000 93,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 15,000 18,000 60,000 93,000 Total 15,000 18,000 60,000 93,000 PROPOSED Page 147 Tuesday. October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a PS -13 -004 Project Name Health Division Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Priority n/a Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Health division has one passenger vehicle with a useful life of about 10 years. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 16,500 16,500 Total 16,500 16,500 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 16,500 16,500 Total 16,500 16,500 PROPOSED Page 148 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 rhru 2017 City of Edina, MN 'roject # PS -13 -005 3roject Name FD Plan Review Software Type New Department. Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Fire Department Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active ,Description . This request is for Plan Review software for the Building Inspections division. The software is requested-by our customers and would improve communications with the customer and reduce the time to approve designs and architectural plans. Currently all plan review is done with very large paper plans. The proposed software would allow for immediate transmissions of questions and results with the customer. The building and fire aepartmentpersonnel that need to work on approving the plans would be notified automatically with the process:, Applicants are notified .when re- submission is required and the process repeats itself until final approval. Inspectors can also access projects and drawings from any location to make notes for updates to approved plans. Upon completion,,plans can be archived electronically. The cost is an estimate. Justification The purpose of the proposed software is to meet the demands of the customer, improve our plan review accuracy, reduce the length of delay in plan review, and improve approval of changes that occur during the building process. The software would improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of the staff in the building inspections and fire inspections division, which will save taxpayers time and money, dramatically reduce Dauer consumption. and Drovide a more transparent and efficient Dermittina arocess. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 PROPOSED Page 149 Tuesday. October 16, 20/ 2 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -13 -006 Project Name CityWorks Code Enforcement Software 2013 /hru 2017 Type New Department Public Safety Functions Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description Cityworks is a data management software program which empowers GIS to manage both physical infrastructure and land- focused asset management. Cityworks is currently utilized by Engineering and Public Works to manage physical infrastructure assets in Edina. Land focused management will be used by other city departments providing services in conjunction with properties and businesses regarding planning/maintenance /enforcement responsibilities. These responsibilities may include permits, licenses, planning activities and code enforcement cases. The software management system provides a central location for these activities, requests and functions to help city departments coordinate by property address. Service requests, work orders, inspections and projects are used to track citizen concerns and all types of work activities with their associated costs. Combining land- focused asset management with infrastructure asset management enables our organization to complete our asset management system. Building, Health and Planning will be key system users with Fire, Assessing, Licensing, Finance and Administration being secondary. addition to the Justification an annual user's fee is required and is estimated to be $1 (Expanding our Cityworks Software Program to incorporate the Code Enforcement component provides a comprehensive software management system for our organization by adding land- focused asset management to existing infrastructure asset management. The software system will address needs of various departments to coordinate information tracking and quality customer service response. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Planning/Design 50,000 50,000 'row 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 PROPOSED Page 150 Tuesday, October 16, 1011 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2013 rhru 2017 Project # PW -02 -006 Project Name Public Works: Braemar Cold Storage: Improvements Type New Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Buildings Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description Complete construction of concrete floor at Braemar Public Works Cold Storage Building. This improvement has a 50 year life and will eliminate the need to continuously wash equipment that gets dusty from the dirt floor that exists in this facility. Justification The Braemar Public Works Cold Storage Building was constructed in 1998 -99 to store off season equipment for both Public Works and Park Maintenance. Public Works Staff has placed concrete on the center drive aisle to reduce dust throughout the building. The remaining storage areas are in need of a hard surface floor. This is a project that was projected to be completed in 2012 but was delayed due to the discussion about the possibility of Sports Dome being located on this site. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction /Maintenance 40,000 50,000 90,000 Total 40,000 50,000 90,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 40,000 50,000 90,000 Total 40,000 50,000 90,000 PROPOSED Page 151 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan 2013 thru 2017 n . ^- 1• 1 AT Justification The Braemar Public Works Cold Storage Building was constructed in 1998 -99 to store off season equipment for both Public Works and Park Maintenance. The building is 17,000 SF and is not fire protected. This project would provide fire suppression to the existing building. This is a project that was projected to be completed in 2012 but was delayed due to the discussion about the possibility of Sports Dome being located on this site. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction /Maintenance 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 PROPOSED Page 152 Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -11 -006 Project Name GPS Electrical System 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Equipment Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Description The intent of this project is to provide electrical locations for all of the electrical services for over 63 municipal facilities and City owned facilities. Justification As a developed community,.the city's infrastructure generally including roads, utilities, and public buildings and electrical equipment is aging and is in need of ongoing maintenance and replacement. Maintaining and replacing infrastructure represents a formidable challenge in the years ahead because of the potential magnitude and cost of probable improvements. Knowing an exact location of these facilities will increase the efficiency of the Public Works Department and will increase the protection of the life safety and welfare of the general public by allowing us to locate these services more accurately. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction /Maintenance 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 PROPOSED Page 153 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # Pw -13 -001 Project Name Industrial Park Lighting Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Infrastructure Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description 2013 thru 2017 The intent of this - project is to provide a change out of lighting in the industrial park near the Public Works facility. These poles have deteriorated at rapid pace and need to be replaced. Normal lighting changes can be accomplished during a reconstruction project and normally are assessed back to the adjacent property owners. Due to the irregularity of lot sizes, it is the intent of this project to changout the lighting fixtures and poles with new poles and change the terms of the Contract with Excel to install meters and reduce lighting costs and increase responsiveness of lighting repairs for this area. There are 64 lights and this simply cannot be performed under the current budget. Justification a developed community, the city's infrastructure generally including roads, utilities, and public buildings and electrical equipment is aging d is in need of ongoing maintenance and replacement. Maintaining and replacing infrastructure represents a formidable challenge in the ars ahead because of the potential magnitude and cost of probable improvements. This system is over 30 years old and there isn't a road ; onstruction project in this area for years to come. The pole bases are rusted and badly in need of replacement. The total cost of these provements is estimated at $416,000 including pole replacement, underground wire replacement, and potentially adding LED light fixtures. e determined that it was most fiscally responsible to complete this project over a four 4 year period. part of Edina's Vision 20/20, one of the goals is to maintain a sound public infrastructure because it encourages the development of a )le private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will eniov. This oroiect meets that eoal. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 416,000 Total 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 416,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 416,000 Total 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 416,000 PROPOSED Page 154 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -13 -002 Project Name Bridge Repairs Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description 2013 /hru 2017 The intent of this funding is to provide additional revenue for bridge rehab and repairs other then the funds currently available in the general fund under bridge repairs (program 1343) There is $10,800 in the budget for 2013. Justification The city receives an annual bridge report from our certified consultant on 26 bridges in town.This report indicates the need for a more. aggressive preventative maintenance program to extend the useful life of these structures. Although most of these bridges are on State Aid Routes. State aid funding is generally used for total reconstruction. This funding also replaces a past project to paint the Centennnial Lake bridge railings that was estimated at $70,000 in 2015. Due to lack of this painting, these,railings now need replacement as they are badly rusted and in need of repair. Maintaining a sound infrastructure is a stated goal of Vision 20/20 and a sound bridge infrastructure is critical to the safety and quality of life of its residents. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 170,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 570,000 Total 100,000 170,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 570,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 100,000 170,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 570,000 Total 100,000 170,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 570,000 PROPOSED Page 155 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a Pw -13 -003 Project Name Parking Ramp Repairs Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Infrastructure Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description 2013 thru 2017 The intent of these funds is to extend the life of three city owned parking ramps by leveraging private investment and providing a City funding source to jumpstart each of the ramp retrofits. These funds will be used for larger rehab and maintenance projects. ie: major joint repair, deck coating, stairwell repairs or replacement, door replacement, camera system etc. and capitalize on the major reconditioning and/or expansion of these facilities in the upcoming years. The cost of these repairs may be billed back to the 50th & France Association if it is the City Council desire but is designed to leverage private investment for larger renovations. Justification ks part of the 50th & France Business Area there are three parking ramps located in the downtown area. Maintaining sound public nfrastructure is essential to offering premium public facilities. It is highly recommended by our consultants to set up a regular scheduled naintenance program. This program will address the ongoing Deterioration and extend the life of these structures. One of the first accomplishments that is mentioned in the original Vision 20/20 is establishing and upgrading the 50th and France commercial neighborhood starting in the 1930s. It also mentions that a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction Fund 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 Total 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 156 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # -pw -13 =004 Project Name public .Works Equipment Replacement Type Replace or repair Department Public Works" Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Equipment Priority n/a 2013 /hru 2017 Status Active Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Public Works department has over $6 million of.equipment covered under this program. Types of equipment include small machinery, passenger vehicles and heavy equipment. Most of this equipment has an estimated useful life of between 10 -20 years. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 390,254 511,395 314,842 664,420 563,415 2,444,326 Total 390,254 511,395 314,842 664,420 563,415 2,444,326 Funding Sources Prior_ 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Equipment Replacement Progra 390,254 511,395 314,842 664,420 563,415 2,444,326 Total 390,254 511,395 314,842 664,420 563,415 2,444,326 PROPOSED Page 157 Tuesday, October 16'2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a Pw -13 -005 Project Name Utilities Equipment Replacement 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description fhis.project includes normal replacement of vehicles that are part of the utilities division fleet. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. We cannot perform the functions of a Public Works Department without a reliable fleet. Vehicles are replaced on a minimum of a 10 year schedule and vehicles have reached their life expectancy. This includes a fleet vehicles, (trucks), tandem in 2013, a street sweeper in 2014, replacement jetter truck in 2015 and backhoe reDlacement in 2016. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicies /Fumishings 260,000 237,000 465,000 270,000 80,000 1,312,000 Total 260,000 237,000 465,000 270,000 80,000 1,312,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 133,000 440,000 104,000 40,000 717,000 Utility Fund - Storm 63,000 197,000 63,000 323,000 Utility Fund - Water 64,000 40,000 25,000 103,000 40,000 272,000 Total 260,000 237,000 465,000 270,000 80,000 1,312,000 PROPOSED Page 158 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # Pw_13 -006 Project Name Well #13 Rehab Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 6 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 13 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2009. This is a well that runs year round. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 159 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # Pw -13 -007 Project Name Well #17 Rehab Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 6 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description this project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 17 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. Justification ks outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Zomprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to )rovide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2007. This is a well that runs year round and is past due for Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 160 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -13 -008 Project Name Well #6 Rehab Project. 2013 lhru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 6 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category infrastructure Priority 5Important Status Active Description This project would include. the rehabilitation of Well # 6 by repairing or replacing the well pump;,motor, and other wom equipment. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its ,municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2007. This is a well that runs year round. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 161 Tuesday, Ocroher l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a UT -08 -009 Project Name Well #5 (West 69th Street) 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 15 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 5 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. It also includes converting the existing well pump to a submersible pump and removal of the building that is in the median of West 69th Street after it is hooked up to the new water treatment facility. The timing of this work has been pushed back so that it coincides with new water treatment facility in the Southdale area. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 15 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its seasonal municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2002. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 162 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan Project it UT -09 -010 Project Name well # 2 Rehab Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 6 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure, Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 2 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. It also includes removal of sand from the well hole as this is a well that now pumps into the new water treatment facility. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City, services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its munici al water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2006. This is a well that runs year round. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total PROPOSED 120,000 120,000 Page 163 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project 4 UT -10 -006 Project Name water Meter Replacement Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 20 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description This project is a continuation of the project that was initiated in 2012 and under contract with Ferguson Water Works. It includes replacing all of our existing water meters with new radio read meters. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. As mentioned above, this is a project that is currently under Contract. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 1,600,000 2,100,000 3,700,000 Total 1,600,000 2,100,000 3,700,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 1,600,000 2,100,000 3,700,000 Total 1,600,000 2,100,000 3,700,000 PROPOSED Page 164 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -10 -008 Project Name Well #9 Rehab Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 15 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 9 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other wom equipment. It also includes building modifications as this is a well that now pumps into the new water treatment facility. As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2006. This is a well that runs year round. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 165 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -10 -009 Project Name well # 11 Rehab Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 6 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 11 by repairing the well pump, motor, and other wom equipment. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2007. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 166 Tuesday, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -11 -006 Project Name well #10 Rehab Project 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 6 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 10 by repairing the well pump, motor, and other worst equipment. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City's water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 7 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its ,municipal water wells. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2008. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 PROPOSED Page 167 Tuesday-, October 16 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a UT -11 -007 Project Name Storm Water Lift Station #3 Rehab 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 30 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project would include the upgrade of the Melody Lake Lift Station by providing new electrical equipment, new pumps, etc. Justification ks outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. This lift station is located in the southeast Minnehaha Creek drainage area as referenced in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. It regulates the elevation )f the water level and provides flood protection in Melody Lake and has become unreliable due to its age and condition. It simply needs to be Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Storm 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 PROPOSED Page 168 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# UT -11 -008 Project Name Sewer Camera and Cable Reel 2013 thru 2017 Type New Department Public Works Useful Life 15 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Equipment Priority 3 Significant Status Active Description This project would include the purchase of a sewer'catnera to mounfdirectly on.the sewer fetter truck to'-give the Utility employees the ability to televise the larger sewer mains and storm sewers within the City of Edina: Justificatio_ n As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services and maintain a sound public infrastructure. With our current equipment, it is nearly impossible to televise our larger sewer mains and storm sewer system. Televising our system provides an im ortant mechanism to proactively diagnose and correct deficiencies in our infrastructure. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehides /Fumishings 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund `- Sewer 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 20,000 Total 40,000 40,000 PROPOSED Page 169 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# UT -12 -006 Project Name Well No. 8 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Infrastructure Priority 4 Status Active Description This project would include the replacement of the siding, roof, soffits and fascia on the entire building. This wellhouse is located within a residential district and needs maintenance to blend into the adjacent land use. Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the goal of the City Council to provide balance of land uses. In order to be a model of urban development, it is the intent of this project to blend into the surrounding land use and provide a more manicured look to this important piece of infrastructure. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 35,000 35,000 Total Funding Sources 35,000 Prior 2013 2014 35,000 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Water 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 PROPOSED Page 170 Tuesday, October l6 2012 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -12 -007 Project Name SCADA Radio System Upgrade 2013 thru 2017 Type Replace or repair Department Public Works Useful Life 30 years Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Equipment Priority 4 Status Active Description Replace all radios on the Gleason Water Tower leg of the SCADA system. Justification The Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition is the communication system for our water and sewer systems. It allows the system to alert our employees when there is a problem and creates the backbone of a sound public infrastructure. The SCADA system allows Public Works Staff to provide effective and valued public service to our residents as outlined in the City of Edina's mission statement. These older radios are outdated, nor repairable and highly unreliable and need to be replaced. Expenditures Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources Prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Future Total Utility Fund - Sewer 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Water 20,000 20,000 Total 60,000 60,000 PROPOSED Page 171 Tuesday, October 16. 2012 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 4, 2012 Subject: Public Hearing: 2013 Liquor License Fees Action Requested: Hold public hearing. Information / Background: ow e ch • PORP`9 1888 Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action ED Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Minnesota Statute 340A.408 Subd 3a requires the City Council to hold a public hearing after a thirty day notice to license holders of its intention to raise any of its liquor license fees. I have attached a copy of the notice that was mailed to our licensees November I, 2012, showing the proposed 2013 liquor license fees. I would point out that the Club, Wine and Sunday license fees are at the limit allowed under statute. This year we are suggesting a slight increase in the On -Sale Intoxicating License fee. The modest increase of $50.00 will aid to cover the cost of enforcement and administration of the licenses. Staff also feels that the beer license fees should continue an incremental increase to keep pace with the City's increased costs for administration and enforcement. Staff is not requesting any action on this item from the Council other than to hold the hearing. When the annual fees and charges ordinance is adopted the fees will be included in the ordinance. Attachments: 2013 Notice of Liquor License Fees City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER INCREASING THE FEE FOR LIQUOR LICENSES The Edina City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 4, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. to consider increasing the fees for on -sale intoxicating, on -sale and off -sale 3.2 beer licenses, and temporary on -sale 3.2 beer licenses effective January 1, 2013, as follows: Club On -Sale Liquor License On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor On -Sale Wine On -Sale 3.2 Beer Off -Sale 3.2 Beer Sunday On -Sale License Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Beer License Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating 2012 Fee $300 Under 200 members $500 201 -500 members $650 501 -1000 members $800 1001 -2000 members $1000 2001 -4000 members $2000 4001 -6000 members $3000 Over 6000 members $8800.00 $2000.00 $660.00 $660.00 $200.00 $91.00 /event $200.00 /event All persons who desire to be heard on this issue can either: Pr000sed 2013 Fee $300 Under 200 members $500 201 -500 members $650 501 -1000 members $800 1001 -2000 members $1000 2001 -4000 members $2000 4001 -6000 members $3000 Over 6000 members $8850.00 $2000.00 $670.00 $670.00 $200.00 $95.0 %vent $200.00 /event 1. Submit a letter to the Edina City Council, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, before the date of the hearing. 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony. This notice is given in compliance with Minnesota Statute 340A.408, Subd. 3A. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Debra Mangen City Clerk Dated: November 1, 2012 4,95/A,l�,. ow e In "roF 'o To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action X❑ Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Plat with Lot Width and Lot Area Variances. Jerrod Lindquist, 5945 Concord Avenue, Resolution No. 2012 -159. Action Requested: Adopt the attached Resolution No. 2012 -159, denying the requested Subdivision with Variances. Information / Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — December 18, 2012) Jerrod Lindquist is proposing to subdivide his property at 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots. If the request is approved, the existing home would be torn down and new homes built on each lot. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A7 —A15 of the Planning Commission staff report.) Also attached to the back of the report are signatures from adjacent property owners that support the project. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A Subdivision (Preliminary Plat); 2. Lot width variances from 77 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 10,028 square feet to 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. Planning Commission Recommendation: On October 10, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the request on a vote of 5 -4, per the findings outlined in the Planning Commission staff report. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -159 • Minutes from the October 10, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, October 10, 2012 • Supplemental Information from the applicant City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-159 DENYING A PRELIMINARY PLAT, SUBDIVISION, AND VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY AT 5945 CONCORD AVENUE IN EDINA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Jerrod Lindquist ( "Applicant ") has applied for preliminary plat approval, subdivision approval, and zoning variances for property with a street address of 5945 Concord Avenue legally described as: Lots 13 (a 50 x 135 foot lot) and 14 (a 50 x 135 foot lot), Block 9, Fairfax, Hennepin County, Minnesota ( "Subject Property "). 1.02 The applicant is the property owner and resides at the subject property. 1.03 Applicant purchased the Subject Property in 1996. 1.04 The two lots that constitute the Subject Property are held in common ownership by Applicant. Subsection 850.07, Subd. 20B4a of the Zoning Ordinance provides: "If a non - conforming lot or parcel is, or at any time since October 22,1951, has been, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining or abutting parcel or lot which together comply with, or come close to complying with, the minimum width, depth, area, and lot width to perimeter ratio, requirements of this Section, then such non - conforming lot or parcel and such adjoining or abutting parcel or lot shall be considered as one lot and shall not be decreased in size below such minimum requirements. If in a group of two or more adjoining or abutting lots or parcels owned .or controlled by the same person, any single lot or parcel does not meet the full minimum depth, width, area or lot width to perimeter ratio requirements of this Section, such single lot or parcel shall not be considered as a separate lot or parcel able to be conveyed and developed under this Code." CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Area Lot Width Depth City Code Requirement - Median 10,028 s.f. 77 feet 135 feet Lot 1 6,794 s. f. * 50 feet* 135 feet Lot 2 6,800 s. f. * 50 feet* 135 feet 1.02 The applicant is the property owner and resides at the subject property. 1.03 Applicant purchased the Subject Property in 1996. 1.04 The two lots that constitute the Subject Property are held in common ownership by Applicant. Subsection 850.07, Subd. 20B4a of the Zoning Ordinance provides: "If a non - conforming lot or parcel is, or at any time since October 22,1951, has been, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining or abutting parcel or lot which together comply with, or come close to complying with, the minimum width, depth, area, and lot width to perimeter ratio, requirements of this Section, then such non - conforming lot or parcel and such adjoining or abutting parcel or lot shall be considered as one lot and shall not be decreased in size below such minimum requirements. If in a group of two or more adjoining or abutting lots or parcels owned .or controlled by the same person, any single lot or parcel does not meet the full minimum depth, width, area or lot width to perimeter ratio requirements of this Section, such single lot or parcel shall not be considered as a separate lot or parcel able to be conveyed and developed under this Code." CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-62 Page 3 �neoa. s` 1.05 The Subject Property is guided Single F a : esidential under the City's Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 1.06 Applicant proposes to subdivide and plat the Subject Property into two lots: Lots 1, and 2, Block 1, Lindquist Addition. 1.07 Applicant has applied for multiple zoning variances: 1. Lot width variances from the 77 feet required in the R -1 zoning district to 50 feet for each lot. 2. Lot area variances from the 10,028 square feet required in the R -1 zoning district to 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. 1.08 On October 10, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the preliminary plat, subdivision and variances. 1.09 On December 4, 2012, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed subdivision. Section 2. FINDINGS. 2.01 The proposed plat and subdivision do not meet ordinance standards for a subdivision, because the proposed lots do not meet the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot area, lot width, and lot depth. 2.02 The variance standards have not been met: 1. The Subject. Property is a conforming single - family residential lot with a new single - family house and has a taxable market value of $266,900. Reasonable use of the property exists today. 2. The proposed variances are not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance which is. to require nonconforming lots in common ownership: to be developed as a single..parcel. . 3. There are no practical difficulties, in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. Applicant does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the zoning ordinance. The Subject Property is only 3,566 square feet larger than the required minimum lot.size. The proposed lots which are approximately 32% below the minimum lot size requirement are not reasonable. 4. The practical difficulty alleged by the applicant's proposal to subdivide the property is self- created. CITY .OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street e Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov a 952 - 927 -8861 e Fax 952 - 826 -0389 . RESOLUTION NO. 2012-159 Page Two. 5. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant's desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. 6. There are no circumstances unique to the Subject Property that justify granting multiple variance to enable the Applicant to create nonconforming lots. The Subject Property is similar in size to several lots to the east. Section 3. The preliminary plat, subdivision and variances are denied. Adopted this 4th day of December, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS October 10, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. Chair Grabiel called the eting to order at 7:00 PM II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Sche r, Forr ,Schroeder, Kilberg, Potts, Platteter, Cherkassy, Carpenter, Staunton Fis er d Grabiel. III. The agenda was filed as IV. Commissioner C enter moved approval of th September 27, 2012, meeting minutes. Co ssioner Staunton seconded the N n. All voted aye; motion carried. V. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Subdivision with Lot Width and Lot Area Variance for Jerrod Lindquist, 5945 Concord Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Jerrod Lindquist is proposing to subdivide his property at 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots. If the request is approved, the existing home would be torn down and new homes built on each lot. Also attached to the back of the report are signatures from adjacent property owners that support the project. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 77 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and Page 1 of 13 3. Lot area variances from 10,028 square feet to 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. Teague noted that Lot 2 would gain access off Concord Avenue, and Lot 1 would have the option of access of Concord or 60th Street. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council deny the proposed two lot subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue and the lot width variances from 77 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 10,028 square feet to 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The Subject Property is a conforming single - family residential lot with a new single - family house and has a taxable market value of $266,900. Reasonable use of the property exists today. 2. The proposed variances are not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance which is to require nonconforming lots in common ownership to be developed as a single parcel. 3. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. Applicant does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the zoning ordinance. The Subject Property is only 3,566 square feet larger than the required minimum lot size. The proposed lots which are approximately 32% below the minimum lot size requirement are not reasonable. 4. The practical difficulty alleged by the applicant's proposal to subdivide the property is self- created. 5. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant's desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. 6. There are no circumstances unique to the Subject Property that justify granting multiple variance to enable the Applicant to create nonconforming lots. The Subject Property is similar in size to several lots to the east. Appearing for the Applicant Jerrod Lindquist, applicant and property owner. Discussion /Comments & Questions Commissioner Staunton asked for clarification on the 500 -foot neighborhood radius. Planner Teague responded that the 500 -foot radius is found in both the subdivision and zoning ordinances as a way to establish "neighborhood ". Chair Grabiel asked for clarification on the lot description(s). Teague responded that the subject property is identified as Lots 13 & 14, Block 9, Fairfax, Hennepin County, Page 2 of 13 Minnesota. Application Presentation Jerrod Lindquist addressed the Commission and delivered a power point presentation explaining his reasons for subdividing and addressing the variances requested. Lindquist said his intent is to do what's best and right for the neighborhood. Lindquist highlighted the following: • Home was constructed in 1948 and it's not family - friendly by today's standards. • Cost prohibitive to improve the home. • House is functionally obsolete and not architecturally significant. • Legal description indicates Lots 13 and 14, Block 9 of the Fairfax Addition. • Believes the establishment of the 500 -foot radius is out of date and was meant for other parts of the city. • A precedent was established by approving subdivisions in this area. • Current zoning laws were created after the Fairfax addition was designed, approved and build out. • Character of the "immediate" neighborhood is preserved and enhanced by these two lots. • Neighborhood support. Public Comment Ray Sharp 5940 Ashcroft Avenue acknowledged to the Commission his "lot" is also a "double lot ", adding he recognizes there are those in Edina that are opposed to subdividing and the further redevelopment of these 100 -foot "lots ". Concluding, Sharp said he supports the subdivision request, adding it makes sense to approve this request noting it was originally platted as two 50 -foot lots in the 50 -foot lot neighborhood of Fairfax. Gary Dorrian, 4708 west 60th Street, told the Commission he does not support the subdivision request as submitted. He noted that variances are needed, adding he can't support a subdivision that doesn't align with the 500 -foot neighborhood lot size requirements. Jeff Johnson, 5825 Ashcroft Avenue stated he supports the subdivision as proposed and acknowledged his home does not fall within the 500 -foot neighborhood. He said Edina is a mature fully developed City with limited options for growth. He said in his opinion Edina is chosen for its schools, adding the new houses built on these smaller lots are almost always purchased by young families with kids. He also noted architects are also finding ways to build desirable houses on the 50 -foot wide lots. Concluding, Johnson said if one looks at the facts and analyses the area, 60th Street is a major divide between "neighborhoods ". The lot and homes south of 60th Street are larger and Page 3 of 13 were constructed 15 years after the lots were platted and houses were built north of West 60th Street. Mary Lokowich, 6000 Ashcroft Avenue said in her opinion she feels that allowing the applicant to build two homes on these lots makes sense. Concluding, Lokowich added the two new houses would look better than one overly large house on a larger than average lot. Edina needs to continue to allow growth for families and this is one way to encourage that. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone else would like to speak to this issue; being none Commissioner Staunton moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion /Comments Commissioner Forrest told the applicant she appreciates his presentation and is not adverse to subdivision; however, in this instance the criteria needed to support the variances is not there. Continuing, Forrest further explained that the Commission cannot consider economic circumstances in the decision making process. Concluding, Forrest said in her opinion changing the ordinance is the way to proceed; especially in these smaller lot neighborhoods. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged the Commission has considered a number of subdivision requests in this immediate area with differing outcomes. He added this "immediate neighborhood" was platted with 50 -foot wide lots but "sits' at the edge of a change in neighborhood character. Fischer acknowledged one could come to the conclusion that in this instance the methodology the City has chosen to determine "neighborhood" does not measure its character. Fischer agreed with previous comments that the "neighborhood" changes south of West 60th Street. Concluding, Fischer acknowledged the applicants outreach to the neighborhood and the neighborhood support. Commissioner Scherer stated she isn't persuaded by the original plat to support the subdivision request as submitted. Scherer pointed out the ordinance was changed in the 1950's to require 75 -foot wide lots, adding that should also be taken into consideration. Continuing, Scherer did acknowledge the differing outcomes for recent subdivisions in the area; however, she pointed out this one is different. This subdivision not only doesn't meet the 75 -foot lot width zoning ordinance requirement it doesn't meet the median required in the subdivision ordinance. Scherer concluded she can't support this request, adding in this instance she is relying on the Code. Chair Grabiel pointed out that there is and always has been a stipulation in the zoning ordinance that allows variances so requesting a variance is permitted under Code and not unreasonable. Scherer agreed, reiterating in this instance she doesn't find a hardship. Page 4 of 13 Commissioner Carpenter said he finds this frustrating on many levels. He explained that the Commission has attended hearings where neighbors are very much opposed to a subdivision but in this instance it's the opposite; neighbors support the request. Continuing, Carpenter said it is difficult to know what the right answer is. Carpenter said what it comes down to for him is that he can't find practical difficulties to support the request for variance. He noted the lot(s) can be used by remodeling the existing home or building a new house. Commissioner Schroeder said he agrees with comments expressed by Commissioner Carpenter on the challenge of finding practical difficulties to support the granting of variances. Schroeder said he just can't find them; a house can be constructed on this lot. Continuing, Schroeder said he finds it interesting to think in terms of character, questioning if character is the plat; lines on paper or is character what one sees. Concluding, Schroeder added whichever way one views this subdivision; one lot or two this corner will change. Commissioner Staunton agreed with Commissioner Fischer that cataloging the requests for subdivision within this area can be difficult, adding he believes an attempt should be made to be consistent. Continuing, Staunton said for him a difficulty arises because the new "lots" do not meet the median; therefore variances are required from both the zoning and subdivision ordinances. Staunton acknowledged that the Fairfax plat is mostly comprised of 50 -foot wide lots; however, this lot(s) is located at a change in neighborhood. Concluding, Staunton said he cannot support the subdivision with variances as presented. Chair Grabiel said that best way.to ask "what's the neighborhood" is to ask the residents. Grabiel said it appears that the majority of residents within this neighborhood support the request as submitted and believe they reside in an area comprised of mostly 50 -foot lots-in a neighborhood of families with young children. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend denial of the preliminary plat based on staff findings. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Carpenter, Staunton. Nays; Fischer, Potts, Platteter Grabiel. Motion to deny carried 5-4. B. Comprehen n Amendment, P ezoning from POD -1, Planned Office Distric ned Unit Development, and Preliminary Development Plan nt Pr s, 4005 West 65th Street and 6500 France Edina, MN. Page 5of13 w9& A,r o e ica PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda Item Cary Teague October 10, 2012 VI.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Jerrod Lindquist is proposing to subdivide his property at 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots. (See property location on pages Al —A3b.) If the request is approved, the existing home would be torn down and new homes built on each lot. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A7 A15.) Also attached to the back of the report are signatures from adjacent property owners that support the project. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 77 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 10,028 square feet to 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. Lot 2 would gain access off Concord Avenue, and Lot 1 would have the option of access of Concord or 60th Street. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 10,028 square feet, median lot width is 77 feet, and the median lot depth is 135 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A4 —A6 and Al 5.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low - density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site is a corner lot and contains a single - family home and attached garage on the east side of the lot. Access is gained off of 60th Street. (See pages A3, A3a, and Al 1.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single - dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and submitted comment. (See page A17.) If the project is approved, a condition of approval should be that the conditions outlined in the city engineer memo must be met. Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Concord Avenue, and /or 60th Street. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in the Area The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this area. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests on page Al 6. Please note that the medians were smaller than the subject proposal.) The following is the history in the past five years: Requested Subdivisions in the last five years 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66 -foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED - Median 10,028 s.f. 77 feet 135 feet Lot 1 6,794 s. f. * 50 feet* 135 feet Lot 2 6,800 s. f. * 50 feet* 135 feet * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and submitted comment. (See page A17.) If the project is approved, a condition of approval should be that the conditions outlined in the city engineer memo must be met. Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Concord Avenue, and /or 60th Street. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in the Area The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this area. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests on page Al 6. Please note that the medians were smaller than the subject proposal.) The following is the history in the past five years: Requested Subdivisions in the last five years 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66 -foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50 -foot lots by Bravura Construction; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100 -foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied their request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) Again, within the above mentioned neighborhoods, the median lot size was smaller than the subject subdivision area. The median lot sizes in these other areas were typically less than 7,000 square feet and lot width was 50 feet. The median in this neighborhood is 10,028 square feet and 77 feet wide. Primary Issue • Are the findings for a variance met? No. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are not met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? No. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the 3 code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes that the property already has reasonable use with a single family home that complies with all minimum lot size requirements. It is the same size as the adjacent lot to the east. (See page A2.) Additionally, while the proposed lots would be similar in size to the lots to the north, they would however, be much smaller than the lots to the west, south and east. (See pages A4 —A6.) These lots all far exceed the proposed lot width of 50 feet and lot area of 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. Because these lots are larger, the median lot area and width in this neighborhood is larger than the areas that had previous requests for subdivisions. (See previous pages.) The action or request by the applicant to subdivide the property causes the practical difficulty. The request to subdivide the lot causes the need for the variances; therefore the practical difficulties are self- created. Applicant does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the zoning ordinance. The Subject Property is only 3,566 square feet larger than the required minimum lot size. The proposed lots which are approximately 32% below the minimum lot size requirement are not reasonable. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The condition of this oversized lot is not unique to this neighborhood. There are three lots to the east that are the same size as the subject property. While the lots to the west and south are smaller than the subject lot, they are much larger than the proposed new lots. (See pages A4 =A6.) Again, this is a self- created hardship or practical difficulty caused by the applicant's request to subdivide. The circumstances are self- created due to the request to subdivide the property. C) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. To subdivide this corner lot into 50 -foot wide lots, it could alter the essential character of the intersection of 60th and Concord. Each lot on the corner is currently larger than the proposed 50 foot wide and 6,800 square foot lot. 4 Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed two lot subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue and the lot width variances from 77 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 10,028 square feet to 6,794 and 6,800 square feet. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The Subject Property is a conforming single - family residential lot with a new single - family house and has a taxable market value of $266,900. Reasonable use of the property exists today. 2. The proposed variances are not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance which is to require nonconforming lots in common ownership to be developed as a single parcel. 3. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. Applicant does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the zoning ordinance. The Subject Property is only 3,566 square feet larger than the required minimum lot size. The proposed lots which are approximately 32% below the minimum lot size requirement are not reasonable. 4. The practical difficulty alleged by the applicant's proposal to subdivide the property is self- created. 5. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant's desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do.not constitute practical difficulties. 6. There are no circumstances unique to the Subject Property that justify granting multiple variance to enable the Applicant to create nonconforming lots. The Subject Property is similar in size to several lots to the east. Deadline for a City Decision: January 2, 2013 11 City of Edina 5881 5801 5800 Sad? 58110 5[01 S500 Legend Sd04 Stl05 Mm 58 0 5805 5801 $d06 - HiOhlighted Feature 3889 SkH 580.9 SBDO 3809 Surrounding House Number 560D 012 W#3 3817 5817 5812 Sal 6106 Labels S1f7 5816 —5817— SS77 5818 Sill $812 N House umber Lapels SRf 5610 5821 582[ 5821 4848 5011 D827 Street Name Labels 2! 6R4 5129 3RD a 3625 5831 5816 3625 am 5615 SR9 Sd71 362a ./ City Limits /�% C S1 3J sue sa3J sn1 . ei Creaks 3 5631 3116 5877 Sam 5817 48 SD37 58]6 � Lake Names 8610 5047 5677 5110 3617 3148 1 Lakes SS43 L61 5811 SW45 5144 5645 St44 5145 5611 Parks 3961 5900 !90 5908 3901 a97N 5760 5900 SDOi 3988 Pls El arce SaTK Srw 3901 0901 5 590 5903 5904 5905 5904 pD3 / e 5905 5908 -3611- 30770 Swe 3877 5908 3909 _5912r- Swa am 4870 30 5911 3918 ,y 5911 $912 I60f 4dB6 IDOE 48'72 3871 591d 3177 > K 4817 5916 > 3917 16 0927 3910 692 59 5957 59m 2 3020 3911 5925 592 5920 5926 Sr4u7ar1v 5929 sX X Sl28 AM am l80.S "01147331' M 4TM 1727 7 U ROS 5939 F-51"--1 5920 0� 5929 n 5929 S9t7 .7031 3917 Mal- 3920 $932 SR2 SbW 26 5933 14 John'sP h 5937 3948 5537 $936 4820 4816 4812 4 "4 017600 172 -11720 4116 $712 4708 3941 ` 3973 3940 4811 1 5960 3945 59W 3941 5915 5914 5941 TN [OSl w .482/4111.4617 4881 5721 1717 6000 N09 ROS RO} 6P01 (OOB 5007 6000 600 6000 6001 8000 am 6003 6604 am 6004 6005 6001 8005 6001 6005 6001 6003 6004 IM2 600.9 [01 6066 wo [806 6009 D008 6009 8006 6009 6006 ,b6e 6009 G0°9 4d0t {600 6012 6012 6017 6072 6013 6013 4877 8017 6017 6012 724 6013 >. 720 1M sold �� '4712 6017 6076 Win, 6077 6011 606 9017 6016 6011 6021 1020 6016 4108 4704 6020 6R/ 6070 700 48os 7'q({f7, 4607 4225 4127 �Y, 4821 482t 4620:4610 6025 6010 6011 6015 6024 6025 6104 qf7 4617 6029 �� 6109 713 6}05 709 1705 4608 46P4 2D K y 6708 6113 [172 i 6104 Rol ¢ [409 R13 64835 6-100 6031 4316 4508 24 ¢ 6701 808470/ 6176 a 6117 S 6173 4700 81Q3 6104 a }07 6700 45M 6120 6121 btt6 6117 6112 G 6100 1705 670-1 4713 860 6109 6t0 6115 [114 6121 6116 b ViFLipa LN 6109 6103 6121 ni9 6171 6125 6120 m 6711 008.807 ua,o.r 6'.emr x7,eriifEfOR 6Nf 8712 6111 8148 6109 4 2t 4545 Ly PID:1902824310101 1. t� „ 5945 Concord Ave Edina, MN 55424 Juuu 11 City of Edina - - - - - J Legend 697NSrw Highlighted Feature — Surrounding House Humber 590J 5904 390T 5900 Labels SM 5706 8903 5961 House Number Labels Street Name Labels 5909 5906 5909 SkM .! /' City Limits – Creaks 4810 3613 5911 59/1 Ej Lake Names MY 5916 5916 3917 Lakes DParks 5911 5910 r< �r 59X1 ¢ Parcels a 9C70.70c q° Sl7S 5911 q 3919 3926 C 687! 4717 41 r3 4709 4105 3931 5916 59" 5973 7! _...._..__- St P"I $ 4716 r.11 4705 4704 5944 �5 Soo I EOTM s7 w �_ - - S , 6001 6000 6Mt 6tNk1 4717 6000 4109 4705 4101 6003 6004 6005 6004 6004 6005 6001 s 6003 z 6006 6009 6008 6006 6008 eoo6 , 60,7 6013 6617 6617 6017 - -- 8011 6017 y 6017 6017 Q30 4716 6016 6016 6016 4117 6071 601! 41a 6010 4764 nhc>AL4 �.¢K1le ®6ffi 6 N�fl 6070 PID: 1902824310101 a '1 I0 5945 Concord Ave Edina, MN 55424 . �i ��cie4Rtt.s�Z� roan 941 s94s &XISTiN& kdPiE A36\ -Awl:. - IF'-, 2.1 1 . . I " x , City of Edina Nor 3900 -- — m9 -,— G 590E 4310 3 do/ a G b 6!], oc.scs am Sh PID:1902824310101 5945 Concord Ave Edina, MN 55424 McAlgh 6t 4rcq - 141 Da$ s' F. 6a297 Sf W 590/ 3900 ON K �y2y_ 7'le� �. 5908 � Surrounding House Number 5920 382E { 31 Sc �: 4717 4rt3 4709 1705 q,3 392 $941 o a•a 0 5932 Street Name Labels Gi Srt J V S ./ City Limits / e Creaks u Lake Names u lakes w Parks 4r1i 4.' 12 470E 4704 � 0 7 . 44 DIN U,71 39,5. 5E69 — 60rNnW 4717 6000 4709 4105 4701 Q6665 dam O -10 ' ',533 S,f• s.f, f. 6004 6003 6061 6006 n 66ft 6 M 6012 10"d 4120 4716 0717 6016 1a,703 6020 oc.scs am Sh PID:1902824310101 5945 Concord Ave Edina, MN 55424 McAlgh 6t 4rcq - 141 Da$ s' F. 6a297 Sf W 590/ 3900 5903 590f 3909 5908 Surrounding House Number 5920 G D � >9� �3 G Sc �: $941 o a•a 0 6001 6665 6000 6013 6017 6021 6000 6004 6006 6012 6020 -9A1 Proposia = �, 7q4- sx (Lot I) (, (goo 5 ,F 4 -- Legend Highlighted Feature Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels ./ City Limits / Creaks u Lake Names u lakes w Parks e Parcels 4 u,d 3GH= RD City of Edina 590/ 3900 5900 iA 3903 59W M Js� s923 -�j� 4,'t7 1713 4709 4705 393260 SM 5029 �0 G 24 S., John'. Pert (�17 J 5117 39,6 ('ys s9� 69 4i10 47,2 4703 4704 � II l 6 City of Edina 590/ 3900 5900 iA 3903 59W M Js� j b SIM Boa s`03569 s101 v 5117 5330 SM 5029 �0 G 24 S., John'. Pert (�17 J 5117 39,6 ('ys 9921 9910 5-p3923 f]s 5921 5923 ioo SYi'�" So }0.]7 5436 5"0 " sw 9m49ry SG to qri 41,17 6oro g ua aas 47e1 a bas Gros Sa+13 V 5 .6600035 6008 6009 45- ! � 7Sta:7 6012 603 47M 60,6 17,6 4117 16021 <708 OC 4104 t1 zfr srw 3901 5900 SD 3905 5904 j b SIM Boa So511, � V 3916 v 5117 5330 SM 5029 �0 G 24 S., John'. Pert (�17 J so 39as 6000 S.. 6rof 6000 60044 6003 J, 6ro1�y,t 60(t9 6003 6013 ro,2go60,2 6017 6016 90 6076 6021 60M .:. 6020 PID:1902824310101 5945 Concord Ave Edina, MN 55424 i • �z•J Lam, �t�Alrtu..Kt' MeJmv, Lo f W, Pk = 77 Fe4 pnv�OSCdI SO Ecr+ CLo � 1) 4 Legend Highlighted Feature Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Label. r/ City Limits Creeks OLake Names ❑ Lakes D Parks 0 Parcels City of Edina 1 1311' 1 59'00 I 46ro J 5900 5T)rS t 1i' 5949 5306 WSJ 5916 5917 5920 SFJln(a. Jw 5929 f 3978 5941 5978 �� 4117 tf1J 1709 4103 os 477E 1717 4706 4761 ` �� _ 3 i Il t11 5945 5940 �3� 667N 57 iV 4.•17 6PP0 4709 .705 476, 6001 I 1 s 6000 `11� �� 8004 6W4 6005 61184 6009 2,1 9 600a 6008 6006 �3 b � s a6r2 6017 60/2�( A0.8 ' J i 7 4770 6016 4716 4717 60116 ` 4161 6021 -� 607U ws� ci:orr..c am I at� .4 o v . 6an4 5r w 5901 5900 5305 5904 5949 5306 WSJ 5916 5917 5920 5121 5929 5933 5941 5945 6001 1 6" 6005 6604 6M 6013 6012 6017 6016 6021 �7es:: 6070 PID:1902824310101 J; 5945 Concord Ave E!v Edina, MN 55424 �`i� Mdlol Lloi� Oq � k z7 135, frJ �Un4R tLA�� iuun PPo�osr�l = 13 S 4 cc � 6" I 13S_ �re� (C0{�� W Legend Highlighted Feature Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels .I City Limits Cr9eks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels "L4 CA lu r ,PAR R*Ti JERROD C. LINDQUIST 5945 Concord Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 952.925.7921 •952.221.0762 (cell) • ierrodl _amail.com Applicant Narrative My name is Jerrod Lindquist and I am the property owner at 5945 Concord Avenue in Edina. I have lived within our wonderful city for the past 20 years and at this current address for 16 years. I am seeking approval of subdivision/variance of my property at 5945 Concord Avenue in Edina into the original two platted lots, 5941 and 5945 Concord Avenue. My lots are currently recorded as lots 13 and 14. of the Fairfax Addition. I understand that this requires a subdivision and variance as the resulting lots would be less 75 feet wide at 50 feet wide, even as they were originally designed and remain shown this way. I have submitted the required applications and fees and am submitting this information to illustrate why they have been submitted and also why these applications should be approved. In support of this endeavor, I have done much research and due diligence through which I have discovered the following: 1. Neighborhood Support. There is overwhelming support within the neighborhood for granting approval of the subdivision and variance applications. I conducted an exhaustive survey of the neighborhood, focusing on and using the 500 foot circle the City uses and requires for notification purposes. The 500 foot circle encompasses 82 homes, including my home. I personally visited with the homeowners (and residents of non- homeowner occupied homes) of 80 out of the 82 homes and had the following results: 71 In Favor 0 Against 9 Neutral /Passive 2 No Ariswer Available/Possible (Please see Appendix for a full description of the survey, my methodology and the results) The overwhelming opinion of my neighbors is in support of the subdivision/variance, little apathy and precisely no opposition. The discussions with each neighbor also covered the following topics which are more fully detailed below. Also, I will bring letters of total support from the two adjacent neighbors — whom, of course, are most affected by this subdivision /variance. 2. Lot Size. The subdivision will result in.two 50 foot lots which will match every other west- facing . lot of the 5900 block of Concord Avenue. The resultant lots also match the vast majority of lots to the north and east, all of which were originally subdivided into 50 foot width lots (although not all homes were built that way, but a large majority were). These lots were all part of the Fairfax Addition. The lots to the south and west of my lots were part of later additions (South Concord and Valley View Terrace 2 °d, to be specific) which added slightly larger lots to Edina. The South Concord and Valley View Terrace 2nd additions actually begin just across the street from my lots, to the west and south, respectively and thus my lots are the most southeastern of the Fairfax Addition. I am proposing that these lots be considered with respect primarily to the rest of the Fairfax Addition and the resultant lot size is the same as the large majority in the addition and only slightly smaller than those in the adjacent additions. In conclusion, two 50 foot lots will be a) in keeping with and b) within the character of the neighborhood as well as the original plat and, once again, has the full support of the neighborhood. 3. Resultant House(s). The houses built/remodeled /redeveloped on the lots would better fit the neighborhood vs. one large house. There have been several houses built on 50 foot lots in the neighborhood over the last several years and building two houses on these lots, given approval, would result in a better fit for the neighborhood. One large house built, as my current house sits, in the middle of the two lots, would not fit the neighborhood as well. Two houses is much preferred over one based on the survey with the 80 homeowners /residents with which I had conversations. I know that the neighbors have noted at least one much larger house built on a larger lot in the neighborhood and while there isn't much opposition to the redevelopment that has taken place, the neighbors would much prefer the two house approach the this subdivision/variance gives. 4. Community Investment. As a smaller but no less valid point, the two house opportunity would result in a larger overall contribution to home values to the neighborhood, boosting per house value (not to mention a higher tax base for the city). This was also the consensus opinion of the neighbors. Plus, granting approval of this subdivision keeps investment dollars flowing into our great city. Conclusion Given the evidence and the history, reality of today and future resultant benefits, I humbly believe and submit that the logical conclusion is to grant acceptance of the subdivision and variance applications. I can also certainly arrange these points into the categories listed specifically in the variance application but have noted that the City Council hearings don't necessarily follow that format. I remain available at the above phone number (my cell number is best) and address if there are any questions or concerns that I can address. I thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jerrod C. Lindquist MIR= 11-_J F0 Appendix Neighborhood Survey Results I endeavored to talk with each and every homeowner /resident within the 500 foot notification circle. Over the period of several weeks, I was able to have a conversation with at least one homeowner /resident of 80 of the 82 homes within this circle. Prior to giving the results, I will .describe the topics covered within these conversations. 1: Background. I explained my history how I came to the subdivision process, which is as follows: a. I was planning to improve my house through interior upgrades /renovations and perhaps an addition. b. Current. valuation.is set at $289.2k as an assessed value. c. Current transactions for similarly -sized houses purchased just for lots (specifically for redevelopment) have been greater than this amount, in some cases significantly greater. In any case, the land is worth much more than the house, which is a unique situation, to be sure. d. Conversations with several local officials and builders led me to the conclusion that it would take upgrades /additions of a very high value to realize the return of the investment, should I ever want to sell the house, especially, given the large amount of redevelopment taking place in the neighborhood and city. There is just no return of investment not to mention no return on investment = return on investment, while. not uncommon for residential housing, is real nonetheless and must be.considered carefully in today's and the foreseeable future's economic climate. e. I, along with several other experts, concluded that my house was basically obsolete and my land would be best redeveloped. As I don't need a large house, I concluded that the property should be sold and I would look for a smaller house in the neighborhood. The conclusion and consensus was also that the neighborhood and city would be best served if the lots were subdivided back to the original 50 foot lots for this redevelopment. 2. Neighborhood Opinion Needed. I had noted the success. and failure of other subdivision endeavors.in the city.(though first -hand experience-and research). "I determined that although the city staff and many officials had supported each subdivision (especially those almost identical to my proposal), .it was vocal neighborhood opposition that scuttled the few that weren't ultimately approved by the Edina City Council. , So I set out to determine how my neighbors felt about my conclusions and plans before I speinfthe'money (not a'small amount!) and time in seeking approval of the subdivision /variance. 3. Survey Designed. I made special forms for each of the properties within the 500 foot circle, provided by the staff at the City of Edina Planning Department and set off knocking on doors: 4. Survey Executed. I thoroughly described my thought and research processes as thoroughly as I could (or was allowed) to each homeowner. This included as much of the information included under items 1 and 2 in this appendix and I was sure to emphasize that they could say NO!, they didn't support my plan and they wouldn't offend me. If they were to be against it, however, I would want to know why so that I could collect the reasons and possibly correct any misconceptions that they had (but reinforcing that they could still be against it, of course), given my extensive work and research into the topic. Results The results of the survey are as follows: 71 In Favor 0 Against 9 Neutral/Passive 2 No Answer Available/Possible Notes: 1. The Neutral/Passive category contains: a. Mostly homeowners that sincerely had no opinion one way or the other b. A few rental homes whose owners weren't available, although logic would dictate that they would be in favor of the subdivision and resultant neighborhood investment. c. One home within which resides one Edina City Council member. 2. The No Answer Available/Possible category contains: a. One home whose resident was just home from the hospital and I didn't want to disturb her b. One home that doesn't seem to be occupied at this time, at least not with any regularity as I could never see evidence of anyone home beyond the grass being mowed one time. 3. While there were none in the Against category, there were three or four that were initially against the subdivision. After short discussions, all of these homeowners voluntarily moved their positions to In Favor or Neutral, all the while their potential vote in the Against category was not discouraged. Conclusion The neighbors are overwhelmingly in favor of granting acceptance of the subdivision and variance requests. Alb Poo is IJA (rN 11V Q, JERROD C. LINDQUIST 5945 Concord Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 952.925.7921 a 952.221.0762 (cell) • jerrodl _gmail.com Applicant Narrative My name is Jerrod Lindquist and I am the property owner. at 5945 Concord Avenue in Edina. I have lived within our wonderful city for.the past 20 years and at this current address for 16 years. I am seeking approval of subdivision /variance of my property at 5945 Concord Avenue in Edina into the original two platted lots, 5941 and 5945 Concord Avenue. My lots are currently recorded as lots 13 and 14 of the Fairfax Addition. I understand that this requires a subdivision and variance as the resulting lots would be less 75 feet wide at 50 feet wide, even as they were originally designed and remain shown this way. I have submitted the .required applications and fees and am submitting this information to illustrate why they have been submitted and also why these applications should be approved. In support of this endeavor, I have done much research and due diligence through which I have discovered the following: 1. Neighborhood Support. There is overwhelming support within the neighborhood for granting approval of the subdivision and variance applications. I conducted. an exhaustive survey of the neighborhood, focusing on and using the 500 foot circle the City uses and requires for notification purposes. The 500 foot circle encompasses 82 homes, including my home. I personally visited with the homeowners (and residents of non - homeowner occupied homes) of 80 out of the 82 homes and had the following results: 67 In Favor (47 Signed, 20 Unsigned/Unavailable to Sign (to date)) 2 Against 13 Neutral/Undecided/No Answer Available. or Possible (Please see Appendix A for a full description of the survey, my methodology and results) The overwhelming opinion of my neighbors is in support of the subdivision /variance; little Apathy and very little opposition. TheAiscussions with each neighbor also covered the following topics which are more fully detailed below . and in the letter sent to neighbors (see Appendix B): Also, I will bring the support from the two adjacent neighbors — whom, of course, are most affected by. this subdivision and variance. 2 Lot Size. The subdivision will result in two 50 foot lots which will match every other west-facing lot of the 5900 block of Concord Avenue. The resultant lots also match the vast majority of lots to the north and east, all of which were originally subdivided into 50 foot width lots (although not all homes were built that way, but a large majority were). These lots were all part of the Fairfax Addition. The lots to the south and west of my lots °d were part of later additions (South Concord and Valley View Terrace 2 , to be specific) which added slightly larger lots to Edina. The South Concord and Valley View Terrace 2nd additions actually begin just across the street from my lots, to the west and south, respectively and thus my lots are the most southeastern of the Fairfax Addition. I am proposing that these lots be considered with respect primarily to the rest of the Fairfax Addition and the resultant lot size is the same as the large majority in the addition and only slightly smaller than those in the adjacent additions. In conclusion, two 50 foot lots will be a) in keeping with and b) within the character of the neighborhood as well as the original plat and, once again, has the full support of the neighborhood. 3 Resultant House(s). The houses built/remodeled /redeveloped on the lots would better fit the neighborhood vs. one large house. There have been several houses built on 50 foot lots in the neighborhood over the last several years and building two houses on these lots, given approval, would result in a better fit for the neighborhood. One large house built, as my current house sits, in the middle of the two lots, would not fit the neighborhood as well. Two houses is much preferred over one based on the survey with the 80 homeowners /residents with which I had conversations. I know that the neighbors have noted at least one much larger house built on a larger lot in the neighborhood and while there isn't much opposition to the redevelopment that has taken place, the neighbors would much prefer the two house approach the this subdivision/variance gives. 4 Community Investment. As a smaller but no less valid point, the two house opportunity would result in a larger overall contribution to home values to the neighborhood, boosting per house value (not to mention a higher tax base for the city). This was also the consensus opinion of the neighbors. Plus, granting approval of this subdivision keeps investment dollars flowing into our great city. Conclusion Given that my property will be sold and slated for redevelopment as soon as this decision is made, it comes down to the simple question of one McMansion or two reasonably sized homes that better fit with the neighborhood. Given the evidence and the history, reality of today and future resultant benefits, I humbly believe and submit that the logical conclusion is to grant acceptance of the subdivision and variance applications to allow two homes to be built. I can also certainly arrange these points into the categories listed specifically in the variance application but have noted that the City Council hearings don't necessarily follow that format. I remain available at the above phone number (my cell number is best) and address if there are any questions or concerns that I can address. I thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jerrod C. Lindquist AM) Appendix A Neighborhood Survey Results I endeavored to talk with each and every homeowner /resident within the 500 foot notification circle. Over the period of several weeks,1 was able to have ,a conversation with at least one homeowner /resident of 80 of the 82 homes within this circle.. Prior to giving the results, I will describe the topics covered within these conversations. 1. Background. I-explained my history how I came to the subdivision process, which is as follows: - a. I was planning to improve my house through interior upgrades/.renovations and perhaps an addition: b. Current valuation is set at $289.2k as an assessed value. c. Current transactions for similarly -sized houses purchased just for lots (specifically for redevelopment) have been greater than this amount, in some cases significantly greater. In any case, the land is worth much more than the house, which is a unique situation, to be sure. d. Conversations with several local officials and builders led me to the conclusion that it would take upgrades /additions of a very high value to realize the return of the investment, should I ever want to sell the house, especially given the large amount of redevelopment taking place in the neighborhood and, city. There is just no return of investment not to mention no return on investment — return on investment, while not uncommon for residential housing, is real nonetheless and must be considered carefully in today's and the foreseeable future's economic climate. e. I, along with several other experts, concluded that my house was basically obsolete and my land would be'best redeveloped. As I don't need a large house, I concluded that the.property should be sold and I would look for a smaller house in the neighborhood. The conclusion and consensus was also that the neighborhood and city would be best served if the lots were subdivided back to the original 50 foot lots for this redevelopment. 2. Neighborhood Opinion Needed. I had noted the success and failure of other subdivision endeavors in the city.(though first -hand experience and research). I determined that although the city staff and many officials had supported each subdivision (especially those almost identical to my proposal), it was vocal neighborhood opposition that scuttled the few that weren't ultimately approved by the Edina City Council. So I set.out to determine how my neighbors felt about my conclusions and plans before I spent the money (not a small amount!) and time in seeking approval of the subdivision/variance. 3. Survey Designed. I made special forms for each of the properties within the 500 foot circle, provided by the staff at the City of Edina Planning Department and set off knocking on doors: 4. Survey Executed. I thoroughly described my thought and research processes as thoroughly as I could (or was allowed) to each homeowner. This.included as much of the information included under items 1 and 2 in this appendix and I was sure to emphasize that they could say NO!, they didn't support my plan and they wouldn't offend me. If they were to be SID �, against it, however, I would want to know why so that I could collect the reasons and possibly correct any misconceptions that they had (but reinforcing that they could still be against it, of course), given my extensive work and research into the topic. Results The results of the survey are as follows: 67 In Favor (47 Signed, 20 Unsigned/Unavailable to sign) 2 Against 13 Neutral/Undecided/No Answer Available or Possible Notes: 1. The Neutral/Undecided/No Answer category contains: a. Mostly homeowners that sincerely had no opinion one way or the other b. A few rental homes whose owners weren't available, although logic would dictate that they would be in favor of the subdivision and resultant neighborhood investment. c. One home within which resides one Edina City Council member. d. One home whose resident was just home from the hospital and I didn't want to disturb her e. One home that doesn't seem to be occupied at this time, at least not with any regularity as I could never see evidence of anyone home beyond the grass being mowed one time. 2. While there were two in the Against category, there were three or four others that were initially against the subdivision. After short discussions, all of these homeowners voluntarily moved their positions to In Favor or Neutral, all the while their potential vote in the Against category was not discouraged. Conclusion The neighbors are overwhelmingly in favor of granting acceptance of the subdivision and variance requests. AIDA JERROD C. LINDQUIST 5945 Concord Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 952.925.7921 • 952.221.0762 (cell) • jerrodl @gmail.com Dear Neighbor, As you know, I have applied for subdivision of my two lots at 5945 Concord Avenue and the other enclosed letter is the form letter notification we discussed that goes to homeowners within a 500 foot radius of my property — a total of 82 homes! I received the ok from the planning department to enclose this letter because, as we also discussed, the letter isn't very descriptive about the process and I also.wanted to take this opportunity to update you on the situation as it stands today. Over the past several weeks, I've been letting you know . in person about my plans and asking for . your opinions and questions about the subdivision of my two lots. To refresh your memory, my house is built in the middle of two 50' lots to make one 100' lot. Even though this was the original design, the city requires that a subdivision take place in order to build two separate houses on these lots. The support for my plan has been very positive with 80 out of 82 homes visited and 70 being positive about the plan, 2 against and 8 neutral (neutrals include rentals, a city official and others who honestly have no opinion or no desire to take a position). That is some nice neighborhood support! I thank you for this as this is important to me as my neighbors, neighborhood and Edina mean very much to me (and has been an expensive undertaking, to say the least!). So that's the good news and now for the not so good news. The city planning department has just informed me that they intend to not support this subdivision, if only because the resultant lot sizes fall below the median for the 500 foot radius. I will describe this is more detail in the coming items. Needless to say, this is troubling to hear this late in the process and seems to ignore the facts that: 1..The neighborhood is overwhelmingly in favor of it, as the survey results mentioned above show. I am also happy to have the total support of my adjoining neighbors, which is important to me. It also makes common sense. (which I will also describe) but I wanted to know there was neighbor support before starting, which there certainly.was. 2. It is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. All of the other_ west- facing lots on Concord Avenue are 50' lots so this subdivision makes them all the same. My two lots are the most southwestern of the Fairfax Addition to Edina while the lots immediately to the west and south were of additions of different design (non - rectangular in many cases, slightly larger design - look at the Hennepin County Assessor map for referernce.or call me and I'll gladly show you my map). This is why my standard two 50' lots are below median. However, a very large majority of Fairfax Addition lots are 50' wide but the 500' circle captures too . many of the lots to the west and south for my subdivision to be above median. 3. Last; but most importantly, itallows two smaller houses to be built vs. one large house, again in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. We have seen the houses that have been built on 50' lots and while some believe they are -too large:for the lot area, it is far better than having:one large McMansion built on a larger lot. We have also seen this done close by and a vast majority of us are in favor of two smaller houses, based on my talks. 4. Similar, subdivisions have been granted in the past with successful, responsible redevelopment results that are popular with the neighborhood, as this one would also be. All this being said, the city planning recommendation is just that, a recommendation and there is hope in that there is at least one precedent set for subdivisions gaining the approval of the Planning V� I� Commission and City Council that were not initially recommended. So, I am humbly asking for your help. But not just to help me but to help our neighborhood and your neighbors. Please note that there is no question that my lots will be redeveloped — it is plain economics at this point as the land is simply worth more than my house. It is not economically feasible to improve the existing house and so it must be moved or removed. It is not my first choice for the property but I (and we) cannot ignore this reality. If the lots are redeveloped as one lot, one large house will be built on them and that is not the best result. So, we must work to have the lots split into their original design. You can help accomplish this by: 1. Appearing and testifying with me at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. The ultimate deciding meeting is the City Council meeting but the Planning Commission meeting is also important to the process. This is the most impactful thing you can do and City Council and Planning Commission members have told me that this is an important factor. Testifying is not as scary as it looks! Plus, being involved in the process is certainly good. 2. Write a letter or email of support. You can write an email to me at JERRODL @GMAIL.COM or send a letter to my address above. I will make sure that your voice is heard at the meetings. The Planning Commission meeting is set for 7pm on October 10th and the City Council meeting is set for November 5`h, also at 7pm. Please let me know in advance if you can come and find me at the meeting to let me know you're there. Thanks so much in advance for those who can come to show and talk about their support — it means so much! Please know that I believe the approval of the subdivision and responsible redevelopment of these two lots is in the best interest of everyone in the neighborhood. This is what we'll get with approval of the subdivision: 1. Two new families in the neighborhood, most likely with kids that will go to Concord and/or Southview! A good situation for these families, to be sure, but also for everyone else. 2. The overall valuation of two houses will almost surely be more than that of one house — resulting in a higher average home values which then results in: a. More investment in the neighborhood — market momentum is a powerful thing especially, with the uncertainty of the current economy, not to mention housing! b. Higher home values c. Potentially less expensive financing (lower rates with lower loan -to -value ratios) d. Easier financing (for additions, improvements or even refinancing) e. A higher tax base for the city that will keep taxes lower for all Edina residents. In conclusion, I thank you for your attention to this letter and your support -- I hope to stay in the neighborhood, if I can. Please feel free to call me on my cell phone, 952.221.0762, to discuss your plans to support this effort, any questions you may have or if you need more information. You may call me at any time as this is the most important thing in my professional life for the next six weeks. Sincerely, .f Jerrod C. Lindquist 410C r Appendix B Neighbor Letter Note: This letter has been updated for latest homeowner survey results and formatted for ease of reading but content is equivalent to original letter. Original letter is available.for review and submitted to City Staff for inclusion at their discretion. JERROD C. LINDQUIST 5945 Concord Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 952.925.7921 • 952.221.0762 (cell) • jerrodl @gmail.com Dear Neighbor, As you know, I have applied for subdivision of my two lots at 5945 Concord Avenue and the other enclosed letter is the form letter notification we discussed that goes to homeowners within a 500 foot radius of my property — a total of 82 homes! I received the ok from the planning department to enclose this letter because, as we also discussed, the letter isn't very descriptive about the process and I also wanted to take this opportunity to update you on the situation as it stands today. Over the past several weeks, I've been letting you know in person about my plans and asking for your opinions and questions about the subdivision of my two lots. To refresh your memory, my house is built in the middle of two 50' lots to make one 100' lot. Even though this was the original design, the city requires that a subdivision take place in order to build two separate houses on these lots. The support for my plan has been very positive with 80 out of 82 homes visited and 67 being positive about the plan, 2 against and 13 neutral /undecided/no answer (neutrals include rentals, a city official, others who have no opinion or no desire to take a position and those undecided). That is some nice neighborhood support! I thank you for this as this is important to me as my neighbors, neighborhood and Edina mean very much to me (and has been an expensive undertaking, to say the least!). So that's the good news and now for the not so good news. The city planning department has just informed me that they intend to not support this subdivision, if only because the resultant lot sizes fall below the median for the 500 foot radius. I will describe this is more detail in the coming items. Needless to say, this is troubling to hear this late in the process and seems to ignore the facts that: 1. The neighborhood is overwhelmingly in favor of it, as the survey results mentioned above show. I am also happy to have the total support of my adjoining neighbors, which is important to me. It also makes common sense (which I will also describe) but I wanted to know there was neighbor support before starting, which there certainly was. 2. It is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. All of the other west - facing lots on Concord Avenue are 50' lots so this subdivision makes them all the same. My two lots are the most southwestern of the Fairfax Addition to Edina while the lots immediately to the west and south were of additions of different design (non - rectangular in many cases, slightly larger design — look at the online Hennepin County map for reference or call me and I'll gladly show you my map). This is why my standard two 50' lots are below median. However, a very large majority of Fairfax Addition lots are 50' wide but the 500' circle captures too many of the lots to the west and south for my subdivision to be above median. 3. Last, but most importantly, it allows two smaller houses to be built vs. one large house, again in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. We have seen the houses that 410(n- have been built on 50' lots and while some believe they are too large for the lot area, it is far better than having one large McMansion built on a larger lot. We have also seen this done close by and a vast majority of us are in favor of two smaller houses, based on my talks. 4. Similar subdivisions have been granted in the past with successful, responsible redevelopment results that are popular with the neighborhood, as this one would also be. .All this being said, the city planning recommendation is just that, a recommendation and there is hope in that there is at least one precedent set for subdivisions gaining the approval of the Planning Commission and City Council that were not initially recommended. So, I am humbly asking for your help. But not just to help me but to help our neighborhood and your neighbors. Please. note that there is no question that my lots will be redeveloped — it is plain. economics at this point as the land is simply. worth more than my house. It is not economically feasible to improve the existing house and so it must be moved or removed. It is not my first choice for the property but I.(and we) cannot ignore this reality. If the lots are redeveloped as one lot, one large house will be built on them and that is not the best result. So, we must work to have the lots split into their original' design.. You can help accomplish this by: 1. Appearing and testifvinQ with me at the Planning Commission and Citv Council meetings. The ultimate deciding meeting is the City Council meeting but the Planning Commission meeting is also important to the process. This is the most impactful thing you can do and City Council and Planning Commission members have told me that this is an.important factor. Testifying is not as scary as it looks! Plus, being involved in the process is certainly good. 2. Write a letter or email of support. You can .write an email to me at JERRODL @GMAIL.COM or send a letter to my address above. I will make sure that your voice is heard at the meetings. The Planning Commission meeting is set for.7pm on Wednesday, October I oth and the City Council meeting is set for Monday, November 5th, also at 7pm. Please let me know in advance if you can come and find me at the meeting to let me know you're there. Thanks so much in advance for those who can come to show and talk about their support - it means so much! . Please know that Lbelieye the approval of the subdivision and responsible redevelopment of these two lots is. in the best interest of everyone in the neighborhood. This is what we'll get with approval of the subdivision: 1. Two new families in the neighborhood, most likely with kids that will go to Concord and /or Southview! A good situation for these families, to be sure, but also for everyone else. 2. The overall valuation of two houses will almost surely be more than that of one house — resulting in a higher average home values which then results in: Alpy a. More investment in the neighborhood — market momentum is a powerful thing especially with the uncertainty of the current economy, not to mention housing! b. Higher home values c. Potentially less expensive financing (lower rates with lower loan -to -value ratios) d. Easier financing (for additions, improvements or even refinancing) e. A higher tax base for the city that will keep taxes lower for all Edina residents. In conclusion, I thank you for your attention to this letter and your support -- I hope to stay in the neighborhood, if I can. Please feel free to call me on my cell phone, 952.221.0762, to discuss your plans to support this effort, any questions you may have or if you need more information. You may call me at any time as this is the most important thing in my professional life for the next six weeks. Sincerely, Jerrod C. Lindquist A"! 0 � I a i ; l eso.lS COTH STREET W. a N o j - ,--------------------- I I I \ 0— 0— I t I I I I Mvrlldaxnch AI,.J A 937 Cu AK - Ed v. MM 5. 424 00 60 An.4 A W. I MN ' d7 - - -- - 11> UN 55414 I I I , I ' ` I I i I II "-`-- \ I 996 AlzR A e Cd . M11 55424 5. I dw -� I _ TI I / �5to me I �Qmk a _ el l_ jr •� • - ---- -i-r'"-' o•- -- 589°57Z18 "E I dd9 y �- / -- M--c, 135 - ----- I------------ - - - - -- - _L_ - w i =; _ I I ail V 1 as /.r.• r �� -- - - /1-- No.5945 i ------- - - - -�— •.�� _ I �^ Pram . :my No.5940 ams Eo �'i'•Q y I I Z I ds3 z /oe..i. 09 0— � `� t' i I .-0 7 - T° •• , � r rt G59A4a0 MAw 4 554 24 AW `N89'rsT18 °W135.97 n -- ... -- ---- --- - - - - -- I a i ; l eso.lS COTH STREET W. a N o j Qom, � �o X01 I I LCGCND_ O Ovix. om b- ays NawvcAt . .- M - ,--------------------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ j 0— I t Y.NAn"'blId. 0— GCAW I C—d A.r. I Mvrlldaxnch Ed v. MM 5. 424 00 60 An.4 A W. I MN ' 55424 Qom, � �o X01 I I LCGCND_ O Ovix. om b- ays NawvcAt . .- M E 3: --- ------- 0— E&-, W 33424 Story F� No.5937 l—k —I,-V P—m nm-- I'll Tl 2 ------------- 5 89,57'1a"E 1: Eesetrrent II r-----------------`--- ---- ---- ------ --------- - - -- -= L------------------------------------ Lj� ............ N 89*57'18"W 135.97 . ........ . 60TH STREET W. 0= L— DU- 553 G A ---- i * AW. . Garages 7 6y0 — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — Owen AlW 5Y,24 -- --------------- ------------------'- --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0— Me— twdl-ft 0- 6001 C. A— Mark U* —ft Mark f2— MM —55424 60177 A LEGfiVD Cl D- 0 Mr-Fe —W—W— Olwl—d W- HEFT INOEK Stow 1 g candw= 1 Shod I =ary Plat Sheet 3ltl Lot. Sheet 4 - Gmding. b.b. M7 aL90 Fi, 3: --- ------- 0— E&-, W 33424 Story F� No.5937 l—k —I,-V P—m nm-- I'll Tl 2 ------------- 5 89,57'1a"E 1: Eesetrrent II r-----------------`--- ---- ---- ------ --------- - - -- -= L------------------------------------ Lj� ............ N 89*57'18"W 135.97 . ........ . 60TH STREET W. 0= L— DU- 553 G A ---- i * AW. . Garages 7 6y0 — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — Owen AlW 5Y,24 -- --------------- ------------------'- --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0— Me— twdl-ft 0- 6001 C. A— Mark U* —ft Mark f2— MM —55424 60177 A LEGfiVD Cl D- 0 Mr-Fe —W—W— Olwl—d W- HEFT INOEK Stow 1 g candw= 1 Shod I =ary Plat Sheet 3ltl Lot. Sheet 4 - Gmding. b.b. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS . 1. The 2005 edition of Ore ronneaole Depedment of .. Trangm t tlon 681andard, SpeditaUons for conso cUm- and the City of Edim s Spedrpflwm 2. The latest adMon of the U[Ma-aai Mar W of Unlram Tm lc mtrd dwAcos. 3.. The latest onion of the aty Engineers Assoda0on of 0- I Minnesota Stendard Spclfloagons. . r . .. 9987 54W 1 ee,v. mm Nd✓5542! .. I i - pq9 I r r5. �r vyp7 s pr ls5 A Mv c tronP u Ae. � .. . Mvs5,z4 110.5.937 CONSTRUCTION' NOTES I I n r r.. a - _O .1. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO ANY cnC a 9.6 xN I I _______ aGG1 EXCAVATION. aaa, ( reo S89°5",8'E ri(DIAL 111 pp Z __ _RILKd50d D 135. I _ _ Syr ( ^� - - - - - - - - - - 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. d 1 ` - - - - 3. PROTECT ANY EXISTING STREET CATCH BASINS _ -� I •� C' WITH INLET PROTEGON DEVICES \ ' _ 'U1 19O _ _ I - _ `10 I `� a• N� - - 4, AFTER EXISTING DRIVE'NAY REMOVAL INSTALL 0, _ i ,N . by I r ROCK CON9TRUCTION ACCESS FOR SITE ACCESS. C� 10 ,,..e sv u, �D'! IKS� AL OU YDIrl \ p ❑ er State One Call 0 -.a rmN aTY ARTAt 681- 45h0002 -Story Prime - TOIL FREE: 1-800- 252 -1164 S89. 57'18 E 135.95 ue No.5940 Go 11, -, 1 OI 1 �� GRADING PLAN LOT KEY I i__ NM3 4 1 1 0- 2.5 5- 1fOAah- *Aloe. 0.9 [oho. Mrs s'Y4 z4 ew0.6 090.4 e9 c� I I ` \ ~� _ : \ esz -'�-- a J S ` 2• U U's. p a w " - ---- - - --- -- U I \ _ "O sxree 1ci T — --- — — — — emena C�r 60 Buhu 7yx 09ard .. l>udnJ Pad - 1 . LRY- TXA7.0 I _ R' � rcnOZd 60TH 5TRFET .W. I ` I -- ----- -. - - -- Oem- -- mr . x e ra I 0„rr: CCO/ C--d A- I Mu:E LOhv , • •- I i i I - 'iQv, MN 55424 ( G=AMcn>RAw. - rw... A°/ 55424 SLT FENCE - - .o¢ 0it£T PROTEC aN- - rvatI rams r nc• Av, ar,1 57D. 2' %3' STOf W 51RVCNRE ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE [114fMp'S1pP.N G ' .. 511RrAtt PUBIC troy ' - nLTEa ILL ev m- a . O9).6 4V.• �i� -- 9TRCCT 56M�sp€nbq dm�6of StM R.11cb IaWfi L262ND sn.u,. Gm&,a.Dmk mU 1N,.'Am P:rpra roar- C Dose ha, Alk n Set &s* 4 nY� tAke € Jvhe Sacks / 5937 Cu icc.d Avc. " I 2dr1)a, N:N 5.5424 � \ 1491.1 :h-te — — — I � / {r•17.r� - "i �Y la.nv+e O:.hots :i936 Ashcroft A.e. 14:Pria, MN 5_•424 I -.5tory Framc , No.593I " 1 I I MP y 11 Garage - _ - - _ - 669.4 N.1 ` zKS a S89--57'18'E 0 135 ' sroposed Dra- a - ,F,SSSr ent — — — — — — — - t Y- 3 en 4bj I I :d1, y`E+y. ♦/ J , ` \ — . _ ^..{gel ` ` ` I �' , `� - I c I 14 yy I ( � ♦ •SO.@ If \ \ �.. _ – – .j 10 � nr- Ar : O q mac$ dd1+.4 �w O h7:,:•0wCy N T +\ 4 .� "h:e 13 r Well tit - – 'tap). 1-0 `_ f l-5tor-yFrame 064.0 I I b! r NO. 5940 ft' 04 o I eea,c It. S eq CM I rA�J`.l_"}y, I�� !\ d: � � _ 1� i { •+.f �'' r O t :'1 VJX5 :rr \ w- +:O*xc:4' \ R O 11 ,� /•f ♦ \ 1 (1 t' -Pay 10 .I' ♦ - ` / 1 O /° d Cannnc Si)arp r- I - -G33. r? I J ` ♦' `♦ 092.5 •' i ". I 5940Ahao%tAvc. UN 59424 u: tr , ` , ' . – 692 ` i` ♦ user c.7 `�.. ^ -- -- ^ 35.97 - -- — --- - - - - -- - s� l �. @gr.J t: •vC•. I apt, `1 ^^ 1 f f I 60TH ' 1 / PrcpOa - a9•r.ccm • r6T)�EET ..W 1 \ I - O - g �v ------- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - -- -------- - - - - -- - -- �/ - . 1 i.lm SCALE: V = 100' 5837 5836 5837 6�1 �5^��,qp 5913'1 5912 $HEFT INGEx 3Neet 1 -E-19 Contlillons Surrey 514881 2- Prellminary 1I41 s wIIMn 3001n1915abjan PN 14x, _:6- Gm01rg, Crainage, UAAIy •M Tree (tan �•3'CH S.TNd 5906 5913 LU 5921 s 5929 ¢ F 5933 594'1 TALI l ri ST W 6EaIl1 t 6000 60,65 61JC�3 V. psnyle Adaren Owner N.- - -A.- Va- D DEPDI AAfAHLFT 72 717 1_00 1 `07094705 +4 701. LU 219 -0}83631 -01115901 CONCORD AVE BENIAMIN RAUN& MEGAN BANI 5 0'1 X927 592(O 59@CONCGRO AVE EDINA MN 55433 S SC1400 R[3_ 65u❑ c. 4 "r 6[C15 i SaffT _ U 5)928 5924 FOIL 6009 } • -, _ _ . I �..,.. 5928 0 5929 x_13 6017 I- ...``:,� 'a'+ f fr -�t ,f '- .;6021 583 I :14 90 62L #OJM 6009CONCORDAVE KAANIUM &IsAnO 6 60@CONCCADAVE EDINA MN 55424 7 5928 6933 W13Cp 0) AVE EDINAMN55424 7 7B 192 -1 f81 2432-00}5 59x8 C0NCORD AVE DAVIOq JEN50N 5 591BCONCOROAVE FOINA MN 5St24 5932 59a000NOORDAVE RBMMR¢&RBIAWR¢ a 59 6 ON pRDAVf EDINAMN 55¢4 W ass 693r I Sgs n-. { t gi ..�`I f i Id y 40 75 IIA 9338 . X2618@82433- 0¢1359W__AVE YATHf ILLANN POMERO 5 59W0.5X[RORAVE FMNAMISSdN 4 48.91 1358 6'190 of 2S 19 SADASHCRIBRAVE fMNAMISSS14 5 $HEFT INGEx 3Neet 1 -E-19 Contlillons Surrey 514881 2- Prellminary 1I41 s wIIMn 3001n1915abjan PN 14x, _:6- Gm01rg, Crainage, UAAIy •M Tree (tan �•3'CH S.TNd 5906 5913 LU 5921 s 5929 ¢ F 5933 594'1 TALI l ri ST W 6EaIl1 t 6000 60,65 61JC�3 V. psnyle Adaren Owner N.- - -A.- Va- D DEPDI AAfAHLFT 72 717 1_00 1 `07094705 +4 701. eeQ01 6000 4 219 -0}83631 -01115901 CONCORD AVE BENIAMIN RAUN& MEGAN BANI 5 5901CONCORDAVE EDINA MN SIAN 4 43.@ 135.8 B7BB 1-Deo9 5909CONCDRDAV RI &1MMEREDYK 5 59@CONCGRO AVE EDINA MN 55433 S SD us. 65u❑ c. 4 "r 6[C15 i SaffT ---� �- j 59IS CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55926 S 600 f soQS i FOIL 6009 } • -, t40C19 6008: I . 6013 6012 i..:., . y 16171 6012• ,..�c1 ,...... x_13 6017 I- ...``:,� 'a'+ f fr -�t ,f '- .;6021 $HEFT INGEx 3Neet 1 -E-19 Contlillons Surrey 514881 2- Prellminary 1I41 s wIIMn 3001n1915abjan PN 14x, _:6- Gm01rg, Crainage, UAAIy •M Tree (tan �•3'CH S.TNd 5906 5913 LU 5921 s 5929 ¢ F 5933 594'1 TALI l ri ST W 6EaIl1 t 6000 60,65 61JC�3 V. psnyle Adaren Owner N.- - -A.- Va- D DEPDI AAfAHLFT 119 @8263]01al SNSCONCORDAVE 1EINODCUNDDUIST 5 59600NCORDAVE EDINAMHSS424 = = 135.97 13594 219 -0}83631 -01115901 CONCORD AVE BENIAMIN RAUN& MEGAN BANI 5 5901CONCORDAVE EDINA MN SIAN 4 43.@ 135.8 B7BB 1-Deo9 5909CONCDRDAV RI &1MMEREDYK 5 59@CONCGRO AVE EDINA MN 55433 S SD us. 619-0J63b3] -0]D711111NCOADAVf tRGTAJO RAMR¢ETAL 5 591703 -RDAVE EDINA MN 55414 1 135% 6]90 )14 018 26 31.01065911CONCORDAVE AA URuDGE &SJ BURBIDGE 5 59IS CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55926 S So 135.86 6'P_1 819- @8243IIll 5925CO- 11DAVE TSGBOT&MTGBOT P P.DAVF EDINA MN 5584 6 6191 9 190}E- }631.01035929 CONCORDAVE DWNASBARGEN/TMNA .E. 5 59ID CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55,36 1 1359 6]91 -mW 5 5937-00RDAVE EDINA MHSSC24 W W 135M 692 31 I 69m CDNCORDAVE EMNAMNSSai9 e es 135 11659 583 I :14 90 62L #OJM 6009CONCORDAVE KAANIUM &IsAnO 6 60@CONCCADAVE EDINA MN 55424 7 75 13).5 1006 ER-lA W W13Cp 0) AVE EDINAMN55424 7 7B 192 -1 f81 2432-00}5 59x8 C0NCORD AVE DAVIOq JEN50N 5 591BCONCOROAVE FOINA MN 5St24 ED ]353) 59a000NOORDAVE RBMMR¢&RBIAWR¢ a 59 6 ON pRDAVf EDINAMN 55¢4 W ass 3300.1 @ EMCONCDgDAVE EDINA MH S_ 3 3645 { t tplp}. ,b19U182b33 -1465 Wl2 CONCORD FVE DgRYLPF1Eg5oN I II ClooRD AVE EDINAMNS- 7 75 IIA 9338 . X2618@82433- 0¢1359W__AVE YATHf ILLANN POMERO 5 59W0.5X[RORAVE FMNAMISSdN 4 48.91 1358 6'190 of 2S 19 SADASHCRIBRAVE fMNAMISSS14 5 50 13536 67W W 19-0Ia- 3431-00 %59160.5H[ROPTAVE IASONLABLEITNER 5 5916ASHCROEf AVE EDINA 29',55)24 5 50 13586 -I 9P3243I- Bl..IHCROFFAVE SAMH f-A- 9 9ID SN RORAVE EDINAMN55416 S SD uss. 69 s7 I 31140382631-009) 5914ASHCROFFAVE BICMTER &PACRATER 5 59NAEH11FTAVE EDNAMN- 4 5 50 -1 6293 LLI s sa 39-026]b31 -0098 59]BASHCROFTAVE K &PCFISLHER 5 5938 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA 29)55424 I IBM Q. j 91 13638@8 + m 1 Z39HR82LNfiJ6 _ +6 #OObs fI100ABIHCR -AVE r 6SYDASHC -AVE E9NAMx55324 1 _ASHGOFTAVE lASWgNSON &If SWANSDN W W04 ASXCBOFTAVE ED NA MN 55424 a as 135fi 11533 * ` `.92 19 @83434W6.1 6008 ASNLROFFAVE HOPE HFFFELFINGER 6 6069ASHCROPTAVE FONAMN-14 8 85 13fi 11435 F, 9 92634 -00A fi0MA5N[ROFFAVE DIGRTFq&1 ATER T TA'ID ASHCRGFTAVF FdNA I.1N 55114 9 91 151 13811 -iO r r11 @82631011]5001ASH[ROfIAVE MBKLEIH&5K3fN 5 5901 x3HCPOFIAVE EMNA MN SSIN 4 4891 ]358 6654 Q L - 419 @8263]29 MIASHCADITAVE TONIA BEAST 5 5905ASKI -AVE ENNAMJ35424 5 50 .BI 6W4 . 939018.3631- @45aNASRIII-AVE DDRO3HYKRONLOKKENTRUS'IFE 5 5903ASHCRDFTAVE EDINA kW 55414 W W 13583 6W5 - 19-028.2631-0113591-IffAOFTAVE T14RESA LJOSV.1 -LANG 5 5917 A9NCROR EDNA MN 55124 E ED 13585 6806 599 .6 4 @8263 All2 91AH RD PYF AM SDOI3ON 5 5911AS -09AVE EDINAMN 55414 W W 2586 6806 -0.9 D1A263101215929AKI-AVE IJLEE &I LAI 5 599ASNCROFfAVE EDINAMN55424 1 1W ]359 13613 9028 - 363103205933 ASHGOFi AVE IC &MB WDOND, - - ASHGOFTAVE IDNAMNSSSI4 1 13591 @11 BRANDERS,', &S KANDEASON 5 5941ASXEROFTAVE NNAMN5512q F Fv _sa 1% 5:94!SZ 19@82631 W%@DLASNGORAYE KIMLGS[NLFNDER FTAL 6 6W1ASH[ROFiAYE FDINF MN 55tH B BS ]35 13599 %1901826 #eDS9 Ex BASHCROFTAVE E &MBREKKE - - ASHCROFTAVE EDIN.AM1155326 7 75 135 W17ASHE0.0FTAVE SRERUNG&LCERUNG W WP ASXGOFT AVE EDINA MN 554N A AO 136 FE 5 IB. t f GSV® r 9119400I&_Io11659205T10NN5 AVE 1- 11CMCCDMEERW F 59405r1OHN5 AVE EDINAMNSMN I Is 1133s. I toss ExxST1oHN5 AVE 1EFFRMBERtE/ANN MOBERLE 6 60WSTIOHNSAVC ED NA MN 55424 W W 395 1m 6 14@b3i34 D0J-• W005T11 -AVE A1.1 T.VERMOEN - - 110HNSAVE EDNAMR -44 9 93 136 ]3486 [yFJ.�3 6 6313- 02826 #ORH WI35T10xN5gVE DOUGLI55[HAFFMICnIESCHAFF a a0st-OHNSAVE MNA111121 I Is ]35 1196 f 6 6419-01 &2633-009) lexVIRGINIAAVE PJ&CAMICHAEL 19 W W@VIR3EU EDINAMN55424 B Be 115 11426 I QL1L -i f 11- 113 -1600 VI11WAVE TSBOWDfN- DossGFN W WD3 v Re AAVE EDINA MN 55424 ] ]5.5 -1 1@SY 330DR 60 NRG NR, Ve PL &LMWANDN W@VRGINAAVE EO NA MN5 +4 9 91 2 092 631 ) )0194DR #33-oDA 6 @3VIRG NM ARE CWSTE 11eITEEL 6 60.11 GINAAVE EDNAMN 55134 9 9&5 1@ 8303 ]8 @ &24334RIsa 4T1160THSTW DAVIDO&RAMNELSON 4AD60MITW EDINAMN 559', ED 175 11262 6012 n 9-0&6340061929 56@85}1 BONNIfTGUARI 4T&fOM STW EdNA MNS 14 W OII )3190]8#33 -00604T660MSTW CMSEDNEU IMORN-FEB AA9 W60MST ENNA -B-4 as 135 7 6DMSTW R&BNELSON 4�3]WWIH ST EMNA MN 554', 90 1]5 1795 7 6U 14 29•@&1433 DD49 4]IT ]514@8 2632 -0036 47d E01H5TW MD&KLGRESHAM 4]03 fOfN STW EMNAMN554N 8371 1306 10w5 �M14 @8263200%6] @60295}1 G SDORRIAN& KSDORRIAN 470J601HSTW FMR1AMR— 83.11 V 021 I 6O1C 6i �TV 18 @8263800364'/116OIHSTW rAITONgR &1 LTOK0.R 4]126@85}1 EdNA MN 55124 BLTl 129.06 1095 YJ 6' 63xaos]4716mms]w swunrory &Kqux7on 4n6aom srw EaNR Mx ssaz4 �7914@82b320N >429SSCNOMRD IOHNBMARCX& MA MARCH a765_.,a. EIN0. MIJ 55424 8353 : 1D@a T'195[IJOOLRO GJ GRDONA &0.P BERNAL 6]095CHGOLRD EDINAMN554N 8352 i 8119Hrz81632-00454)]35[NOOLpO RIC9NNEU. HFCONNELLTR 4721BIHOOLRD EDINA MN SSf14 83.51 l20 10@8 Ax IB0 3bODL4T1)S. RRD WIRSK ESSENDRUP 471) SCHOOL RD EDINA MN S 6352 IroIE 1DTA. TOTALS 82 ¢ 598]31 l[e9] A6Bq FANNVEAAGE —AVERAGE ) MEDIA MEDRA. n I35n ]IAn Lot areas shown from Hennepin County Tax Records Lot Wdth and Depth as dmennlned by the Cly Of Edina'a do nation shown In Seollon 850 of the City Code. Lot lnformatl,n from Hennepin County. R -1 LOTS WITHIN Sf10 FEET OF PROPOSED LINDOUIST ADOI Jerrod Lindquist 5945 Concord Ave. Edina. MN 55424 NOTES: Poesty AdtraaR 5945 Cam', Ax, Edina, MN 55124 PIBpMy 6RNMCaa4n Nunber.lG2M- 249idF% EA-DZ EChsslRmRm- R- ,(HBple DMNp LMI Dlaepr) Plopoaad Zoning clxs 11-- 161(S81p4 D,N*V UM ¢eek ) RewlreN Bru3nCA x 55baa Ie4pcR11NwRa 40.8 Teel Canmr4 el6om BlAn Currr SIBa Slree�- t5 fen Eke : Varies xllb 6NllNrq MI9M (S /M mMNNm) Roar YamM: 15Jee1 T9bl Arx dROp ty ISS9i sg.e ro.B, +oAS1 �.a�n anbr9rd1. h uumc 3l�'t�� r �I`� Legal Descdpkigm,_,.I Luc 13 and 14, 131 a 9, F.Wit, Ii-eply C-t7, AUen LINDQUIST ADDITION For. Jerrod Lindquist 5945 Concord Ave. Edina, MN 55424 CERTIFlCATION iti Prry Rnammm .nw.n ary pour ANN 61 nme ar Immmaam 1 lunlrynallnB nan.sPecNmam, Pr nuenvnpemrealy ms0 .,Nerwlm me ma1l.m4 &4YU«.+raa Imo sr..aw, mgarma rwym mwn ww mtln wa:,ls >n, P preNaPl?V4maaeidNnggpmpeny. DNae Ia zm 9 nNrz sWNk n.ymRao-rrNS9z 0iia1i"tl LOT SURVEYS COMP, unro suRVeroas )60170R0 AVENUE N. BROOKLYN PARK MN 55625 603093 pMne 18358835}2 (ax As Nq x._Nr4rx..wnrAP rJSra 1160 -72 as - AH93 She MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371. A. Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com w�tpp1.1 m 0 Date: October 4, 2012 H'o crs a .. • �'�'rrgnuu•� To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle - Director of Engineering Re: Linquist Addition Dated August 30, 2012 Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plat and offer the following comments: Sheet 2 of 4: • Curb cut permits will be required for both driveways. Lot I will be required to access their lot from 60`h Street West. Sheet 4 of 4: • . The majority of the drainage, including all of the roof drainage, is required to drain to either Concord Avenue or 60`' Street West due to potential flooding issues in the rear yards of the properties to the north. • A full width (curb to curb / saw -cut to saw -cut) repair of Concord Avenue will be required when installing the new sanitary sewer and water service connection. Engineering will required a more in -depth review of the project if it is advanced. Engineering Department .• 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Subdivision Susan Anderson <bssgox @aol.com> To: jerrodl @gmail.com Jerrod, Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:01 AM Thank you for keeping us informed about the process of subdividing your 2 lots at 5945 Concord Avenue. We support your efforts and prefer the building of 2 homes of moderate size than to have another McMansion that doesn't fit the character of our neighborhood. Best of luck in having your issues successfully resolved. Bryan and Susan Anderson 5941 Ashcroft Ave.. Upcoming Planning Commission Meeting marcia cabot <mtcuandme @yahoo.com> Reply -To: marcia cabot <mtcuandme @yahoo.com> To: Jerrod Lindquist <jerrodl @gmail.com> Jerrod: -om and I will be sending an e-mail in support of your subdivision. Good Luck. Marcia 5925 Concord Avenue Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:32 PM Upcoming Planning Commission Meeting Mary Nelson <jmjt33 @gmail.com> Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:28 AM To: Jerrod Lindquist <jerrodl @gmail.com> Jerrod, I am out of town, but want to make certain that you and the commission have my full support of your proposal to subdivide. It is practical, sensible and reasonable. You have been thoughtful and communicated clearly. I have no objections whatsoever. Sincerely, Mary J. Nelson 4701 W 60th St Edina, MN 612- 940 -6772 Sent from my Phone Sacks, Mike <MSACKS1 @fairview.org> To: Jerrod Lindquist <jerrodl @gmail.com> Edina City Council; Edina Planning Commission: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM My name is Mike Sacks. My address is 5937 Concord Ave. My property is immediately adjacent to the north of Jerrod Lindquist's property at 5945 Concord Ave. My wife, Julia, and I have been in residence since Dec. 1990. Mr. Lindquist has been upfront and informative about his attempt to sub - divide his property into two buildable lots. My wife and I feel we are well informed on the repercussions of this subdivision and support Mr. Lindquist's efforts n this matter. Thanks you for your consideration, Subdivision 5945 Concord Avenue hack to the 00ginal Design the hest Path Forward Jerrod Lindquist, Property Owner Jerrod Lindquist, Property owner ❑ Edina Resident ❑ 20 Years ❑ 16Years at this address ❑ Involved in the community ❑ Interested in doing what's best and right for the neighborhood Overview ❑My Home ❑ My Lots ❑ Neighborhood Definition ❑ Variance Finding Are Met ❑ Location within Our City ❑ Neighbor Survey Li Conclusion My Home ❑ Built in 1948 ❑ 2 Bedroom, 1 %2 bath = not family - friendly by today's standards ❑ Based on building activity, it is cost prohibitive to improve the home which has led to redevelopment ❑ House is functionally obsolete and not architecturally, historically significant ❑ Change is difficult to embrace and met with trepidation, but it is here today for you to decide upon fthbmab�� My Lots ❑ Legal description Lots 13 and 14, Block 9 of the Fairfax Addition so' 14 so' 13 136' Neighborhood Definition ❑ The 500 foot radius neighborhood definition seems out of date and is the main reason for City Staff's opinion of not meeting variance requirements ❑ Meant for other parts of the city for new development ❑ Does not account for existing lot design, modern building practices and design ❑ Is not followed consistently to define character of neighborhoods ❑ Evidenced by changes contemplated by Edina * No changes yet, handling each on case -by -case basis moil, Variance Findings ARE met ❑ Practical difficulties =The current zoning laws cause practical difficulties in building two homes as the lots were designed and the use of two lots for two homes is certainly reasonable. There is precedent for approving subdivision here. ❑ Relieve practical difficulties =The current zoning laws were created after the Fairfax addition was designed, approved and built -out. Approving this subdivision to allow two homes to be built to best fit the character of the neighborhood is best. ❑ Functional and aesthetic concerns are Icey to the neighborhood and the primary reason for overwhelming neighbor support. Variance Findings ARE met ❑ The circumstances that are unique to the property are that it was designed as two lots, the lots were combined for tax purposes only in 1948 and now the city is best served by subdividing them back to the original design to allow two homes to be built rather than one big house. ❑ This circumstance is not self- created. It is created by the development of the 50' lots in the neighborhood. Which is a good thing, by the way. ❑ The character of the neighborhood will be enhanced by the subdivision of the two lots. Please see the following pictures: The Four Corners of 60,h & Concord Houses are close together....except Variance Findings ARE met ❑ My house has much room around it ❑ Every other house on 601h& Concord has minimal space between houses (as is every other house on the block, even to the south). ❑ Drive down Concord, my house is different. ❑ In fact, there is only one other house not built that way within the 500 foot radiuis. ❑ It is standard, even for new homes, to have minimal space between homes to allow. larger front and back yards. My house and the other are exceptions to the character of the neighborhood. ❑ Therefore, the character of the neighborhood is preserved, even enhanced, with two 50' lots vs. one. �S Y �o Example of Subdivisorr/Var°iarrces Granted Example: 5920 Oaklawn *, Granted subdivision /variance of two 50 foot lots Conclusion: Every part of section two is met with the condition of 5945 Concord Avenue Resolution 2009 -72, Findings, Section 2 5945 Concord Avenue Comparison a. "There is a unique hardship to the property Every lot on the west side of Concord caused by the existing property which is two Avenue ending with 5945 Concord times the size of every lot on the block." Avenue, the very western edge of the Fairfax Addition, is half the size of this lot. It would be equal to the size with a granted subdivision. b. "The requested variances are reasonable in the This entire statement is true of 5945 context of the neighborhood. The existing lot is Concord Ave both larger and wider that most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood." C. "The proposed lots would be the same as the lots This entire statement is true of 5945 were originally platted." Concord Ave d. "The variances would meet the intent of the This entire statement is true of 5945 ordinance because the proposed lots are of Concord Ave similar size to others in the neighborhood." e. "The property owner owns a lot that was This entire statement is true of 5945 originally platted as two lots on the block, and Concord Ave without the benefit of a subdivision, can't do what the neighboring property owners do with the same space." f. "The City approved a small lot subdivision in the This entire statement is true of 5945 5900 block of Ewing & France, subject to the Concord Ave condition that building footprints, setbacks and building height be consistent with existing homes in the neighborhood." * See attachment for outlines paragraphs Example of Subd vlson/Var fiances Granted Example: 5920 Oaklawn, Granted subdivision of two 50 foot lots Conclusion: Every part of section two is met with the condition of 5945 Concord Avenue. The recommendation is the opposite, however. Incidentally, 5901 Oaklawn Avenue is larger than stated in the report and thus many statements aren't entirely correct. This subdivision was approved by an 8 -1 vote of the Edina Planning Commission and 3 -2 by the Edina City Council. Many other subdivisions that were recommended for passage and were ultimately successful follow many, if not most or all of these points. They also apply to 5945 Concord Avenue and I ask that they be W Ied using the same standard. Planning Commission Staff Report, Primary Issue Section Is the proposed four lot subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes this site is reasonable for three reasons: 1. `The proposed lot areas, lot widths and lot depths would This is true for 5945 Concord Avenue as be consistent with the original plat and every lot on this every west - facing lot of the 5900 block of block. Most lots are 50 feet wide and 134 feet deep as Concord Avenue is 50 feet wide and 136 proposed." feet deep. (The facing lots average under 65 feet wide and 135 feet deep but were also part of different additions) 2. "Reduced building footprint...:' This is true for two subdivided lots as two homes must necessarily have a smaller footprint over one home. 3. "The proposal meets the finding for a variance..." a. "The hardship is due to the fact that the subject property This is true for 5945 Concord Avenue. is double the size of all lots on the block. This area was originally platted with 50 foot lots, including the subject property If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area." b. "The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to This is also true for 5945 Concord Ave, as the Oaklawn area. Most lots are 50 feet wide. Every lot previously stated. I also did not combine on this block is 50 feet wide, with the exception of the the original lots and they were combined subject lot. The applicant did not combine the original for property tax purposes, mainly. Edina lots." benefits from more property taxes from subdividing these lots. C. "The variance will result in an improved plat with single This is true for 5945 Concord Avenue. family homes built on each lot." d. "No. Given the size of other lots in the area, the variances This is true for 5945 Concord Avenue as would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The stated under item 1 of this section. resulting lots would be the same size as every other lot on the block." Variance Findings ARE met Precedents have been set: ❑ Note the example, which was recommended and granted a subdivision & variance, in addition to others ❑ The conditions here are similar: "Two times the size of every lot on the block" "reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood ... larger and wider....two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood" "same size as the lots were originally platted" "The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed the neighborhood." lots are similar to the others in Variance Findings ARE met 5920 Oaklawn (cont): "The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are similar to the others in the neighborhood." "The property owner owns a lot that was originally platted as two lots on the block, and without the benefit of subdivision, can't do what the neighboring property owners do with the same space." "The City approved a small lot subdivision in the 5900 block of Ewing & France" Variance Findings ARE met 5920 Oaklawn (cont): "The proposed lot areas, lot widths and lot depths would be consistent with the original plat and every lot on this block. Most lots are 50' wide and 134' deep as proposed." "Reduced building footprint..." ❑ Hardship NOT self-created: "Hardship is due the fact.... "double the size" "originally platted with 50 foot lots" "The applicant did not combine the original lots" "The variance will result in an improved plat with single family homes built on each lot" — better city planning Variance Findings ARE met 5920 Oaklawn (cont): "The property owner owns a lot that was originally platted as two lots on the block, and without the benefit of subdivision, can't do what the neighboring property owners do with the same space." "The City approved -a small lot subdivision in the 5900 block of Ewing & France." ❑ Subdivision was granted to Kirby Herman in 2011 was a similar situation, not recommended by Edina Staff but wisely passed by the Planning Commission and City Council Location within Our City nn eu IA► ¢ loA at lot/ t1A 1 "l Il_1l 1l IN 7tN 00Za + 8 i7 911 -1 i�0ai9 BWA aa[1 Iat/ p[a tl it I LoOL/ 1 aotl lau 0011 ton M1 /O11t" ally tila 0110 Ala I AI OZI HI NI 8 Y i 11 y m Llla tits 0110 -- '� 1\ wlf Clla LIN T. .1 , ILI/ all$ 9Cte Ulf ail/ site Sala Bala 6010 - -- —_— I'- &1 1111 111/ 3 fiN alle KN p ��_ly-ti,� 6010 J Ct A OLI0 4118 y Sul 1010 �p 1011 _6011 �� 111 (!1/ A me IA1///7�� - - 0010 IOl/ Sots 9011�a'- 11N solo tll/ F 11111= _- MII one sl� 7(�-� g > > J �.ItM :t 7 NIB 101. till t11: 10U 4901. _ sole - - -- -?M ,► a i Hot Kotjl upp le gip/ L l f Ica �Iws nio1'1 acalr g.A /lot 1101 0101 Llo/ i tlot LI06 clot a Llaot -- ps It , L106� Clot . Clot 1 1106 1o0a Ba90 �p 1001 tea Not � soot rasa j 9p1 6oeo woo — 090 �.00 11w1 om! Ion aooB low M is H oo _ �_ seta — — }409 9664 __p I AN 0100 Mtclm ies - 16eo 0 We afy C mos 6L69� tro,9- "Of t u" SZ69 0 rats 9IM 1I va 5269 fLas stag o _OiOi _liQ9J 'LSE 1 f Oleo O m _GIGS Llt7d Ellis CI o9 LIB CINr 9110 16 aces 9009 Does woo TOtE _SQOE �QO ,M, — s y t M Is Him N97 9ml M "rL I 0181 Is s Asp lMf :Ku 9CB9 Me OM 79 ; 9019 Un ues eo °o cts y Uss cm - i1eo BLBS 0 9109 f s o alas OLtS I > 01-09 pE ?S2a s s 01 Lleo y LIeo Zito oleo It" ales t19p_ ?in Cleo log ilt9 Cleo > [189 app lim om K 6 sat Es9i toes spas . _ 1.K OW .1"S 9007 :. taep OOZE_ 10". "it N1 /9 1 ►,� IaA °°°`, son 1v' '"W� `_-� G _. M ac luq,_ 3 �$y IOL9 tJ t 3v 8 AY X 011138 No 6801 6800 6801 6800 i 5801 1 6600 - 5801 -x5800 6801 ssoo _5801 5800 - 5805 6804 6805 6604 5805 6804 6806 6804 6805 5806 6804 -- 6808 6809 6608 5809 5808 6609 6808 6809 6808 5808 Boos 5800 6812 6813 6812 j 5813 5812 6613 6813 6812 6812 6617 6816 581_7 5816 5817 6816 6817 �2. 12 5817 6818 5818 2_§_8l - = 6821 6820 5821 5820 6821 6821 S8� 6817 6820 6824 _1 6820 y Fairfax ' 58296 5828 2 5825 X28 58829 5628 6829 28 _682.9 6828 5829 5828 — _- __._.__ _ -- 5833 6832 6833 6832 5833 6832 6833 6832 683 6832 5832 5837 6838 5837 6836 5817 5838 6837 6636 f5841 837 6836 !683:7 6836 5841 5840 6841 5840 6841 5840 6841 5840 5840 6840 • • 5844 6845 5844 6845 5844 6845 6844 845_ 5844 45 5844 Addition6901 5900 6901 6900 5801 6900 5801, 5900 5801 1 5900 6901 5900 6905 8901 6905 6904 ! 5905 6904 5905 ; 5904 5905 5904 6905 5904 ! 5909 _6908 6909 5gp8 -- 5908 6809 5908 6909 5908 5909 _ 5908 , Plat Map 5913 6912 )6.1929 5913 5912 6.913 1 5912 5913 5912 6913 6912 — 916 —. 5917 6918 [ ! 6917 5918 - 6817 -6916 6917 6916 6817 5918 5921 5920 820 E 6926 6920 5921 6920 6921 6920 ' 5921 5925 1 5924 5y24 6925 6924 5925 5924 6926 5929 fi 6829 6929 5928 b829 5926 6929 6928 6928 5933 5929 5933 5932 5933 6932 6933 6932 6937 5937 5936 5937 5938 6941 6940 4 6941 5940 ' 6941 5940 6946...__5944- 5845 6944) i 5945 f 5944 5-11-9- 6 6941 A preponderance of 50 foot lots 6001 1 6000 I 6001 6000 6004 1 1- 6005 6004 6005 -a - - -I 6008 6009 6008 6009 1 6012 6013 6012 6017 j 8016 i 6017 8016 6021 ; 6020 8021 6020 6025 1 6024 6026 5024 6029 6028 6029 Mn 6033 6032 6033 6032 i 6037 6038 6037 6036 6037 604, 6949 6039 t -- so14 Boas soi6- sou soar 6161 6100 Sidi- 6100 6101 6100 6104 6105 6104 6104 -- -- 6108 6109 6108 6,09 '6108 8112 6113 6112 6113 5112 8115 6117 6116 6117 6117 6120 -__ —_ 6121 _6120_ _8121 6120 6121 8125. 5124 8125 6129 6128 8129 6128 8129 13337 6132 6133 - -- 6133 .-_44 12 8136 8137 8138 6137 \ 4404 6145 8144 6141 �rr� ar w Unplatted • South Con or 2nd Platte othCn MTH n w i a Y i aily,View _ - Terra0e 3rd 1 a 8- , A Crossroads of Additions Fairfax Addition Plat Map Y,MA� 5801 590— 1 6800 I 6801 h_ ' 6800 1- 6801 5800 69Dd 6801 Sm 5805 6804 6805 T 680d 5805 6804 6805 i 6804 5924 6806 6809 _ 6808 5809 6808 6812 6809 6813 6808 6812 6808 5813 6809 6813 6808 5924 , 6928 6819 6672 i 6817 -- -. -.... 6816 6817 _ .. 6816 - _....... 6817 ____._._- 6817 __._......_......_. 5812 5817 _..._.. 6816 5821 6820 5 6821 6820 5821 5821 6820 5821 5820 6825 6824 Y� ! 5825 6824 5825 d5840 6826 6828 6029 6028f 6826 6828 6829 5828 -- - 6828 5_629 6829 6037 6036 : 6037 6829 8037 5831 5832 6833 6832 5851 6833 6832 6044 5833 6832 1 6837 6836 5837 6836 5937 5837 6836 81 6837 5838 5841 6640 6"1 5840 i 6841 5841 6840 6117 6841 6840 6120 6121 6120 " - -- 6121 ° 8125 6845 6844 -. 6846 5844 ;; 5901 _ 6905 1 6909 t 5913 590_0 ( 6904 5908 5912 6901 _ 69_00 6906 6904 6909 69W 6913_ 5916 1 5917 6921 5920 [ 69� pRp 9 5933 -- 6841 6946 5901 5905 16813 - : 6917 6925 6929 6933 6937 5900 _6904 5908 5912 6916 ., 1 6901 6906 6909 6913 6817 6921 5925 6929 6933 5937 .5945... n. 5900 69Dd 5908 5912 5916 5917 6916 5921 6920 6920 6924 6920 5925 5929 5924 5924 6828 i 6833 6928 6828 5932 5936 .5936 6840 - 6944.. 6924 1 6929 6928 ;�;, 5924 , 6928 6940 _6941 6946 5944 .. But still a part of Fairfax, designed with the rest of Fairfax. Two 50' lots fit with the rest of Fairfax, neighborhood 6801ry'*5800 5805 6804 5809 6806 6812 6917 U20 j 6825 5824 5829 6828 333 583322 5837 6m 6945 6840 5944 6901. 6800 5901 5900 5906 5904 5905 5904 6909 5908 5909 5908 5813 5912 6913 5912 ` 6917 6918 5917 5816 6921 6920 6925 $921 x6925 59 1I I 6924 1 6929 6928 6 286 9 5924 , 6928 5933 5932 6837 5936 5941 6940 6945 6944 6933 5937 ' 6941 ' 6946 6932 ,, 6838 _I 6940 1 6944 6001 8000 6001 6D00 6005 6004 6005 6004 -- - - - - -- 6008 i 6009 6012 6009 6013 6008 6012 8017 6016 6021 6020 i 6017 6018 6020 6026 6024 6024 6029 6028f r6021 6028 6033 6032 6032 6037 6036 : 6037 36 8037 6041 _6040 6039 — 8045 6044 6041 6044 6045 6101 8100 nn ' 6101 nr 6100 6101 8100 ■f 6104 8108 _6105 (6109 6104 6109 81 6104 7 6108 � 6112 6113 6112 8113 6112 6116 6117 6116 6117 6117 R 6_120 6121 6120 6121 6120 " - -- 6121 ° 8125 6124 8125 -. 6129 6128 8129 6128 6129 - 1333 6132 6133 - - 6133 • 4412 6136 6137 8136 6137 �� 4404 6141 6141 6146 .6144. 6143 Our Block Currently: o 24 Lots Total o 18 Lots of 50 foot width • 2 Lots of 60 foot width • 2 Lots of -70 foot width • 3 Lots of 100 foot width, all consisting of two 50' lots SGHODLRD 5928 5932 5940 5944 s 0 5901 5900 5905 5904 5909 5908 5913 5912 5917 5916 5921 5920 5925 5924 5929 5928 5933 5937 5936 5945 5940 D i Our Block 0 All originally 50 foot lots Currently: ® 21 Lots Total 18 Lots of 50 foot width • 3 Lots of 100 foot width, all consisting of two 50' lots � t � 5901 5900 5905 5904 5909 5908 5913 5912 5917 5916 5921 5920 5925 5924 5929 5928 5933 5937 5936 5945 5940 V Our Block All originally 50 foot lots Currently: 11 Lots Total 10 Lots of 50 foot width ® 1 Lot of 100 foot width, consisting of two 50' lots Definition of neighborhood used for approved Brookview subdivision 5945 Concord Avenue: V. 0 z 5901 5905 5909 5913 5917 5921 5925. 5929 5933 5937 5945 Legal Description: Lots 13 & 14, Block 9, Fairfax Addition '� t Neighbor Survey I did it to determine support or lack thereof • Previous subdivisions had run into trouble because of this • If neighbors were against it, I wouldn't do it • Good neighbors • It's expensive Once the near neighbors (including most importantly, the adjacent neighbors) were found to be in total support and after discussions with others in Edina, started the process y * See letters of support from neighbors, more on the way! Neighbor Survey Results: • 71 Yes* • 8 Neutral or Not Available • 3Against * 58 Signed, 13 unsigned /yet to recontact — copies available SCHCJL HD eoTH sT w S K O O N 3 59TH ST W n� i 0 h f Yes (signed) Yes (not signed) Neutral Against Neighbor Survey Lots with sightline to 5945 Concord Avenue • 25 Lots •24 Yes • 1 Neutral . IDTH 5T w 0 0 U 0 U ■ Yes (signed) ■ Yes (not signed) Neutral Against What Does the Neighborhood Want? Given that redevelopment will take place, the neighborhood wants: 4- - MMOMM TWO LOeTS � ® Overwhelmingly in favor of two homes vs. one ® Fits better with design and character of neighborhood ® Two houses designed for 50' lots is wanted by far ® Spacing between two houses fits every other house on the block — fits the existing design ® Redevelopment has already taken place (now to 12 yrs) ® Affordable housing for families with children, next to 3 schools ® Families are moving into new homes built on 50' lots New Development Solid development for families, a good thing for the neighbors and neighborhood! What does Edina get? ® Homes for two families Total value of investment of $I.5MM vs. I.OMM Ll Homes that better fit the neighborhood LJ Increased home values ® Benefits for neighbors A better neighborhood Fact: Redevelopment is here for 5945 Concord Avenue, the question Is: Two Homes -- or -- One McMansion? Pal- Attachments Neighbor Letters of Support Previous Reports ,. Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. �. ��S�h ��. ✓,� U, Ste► �c Printed e Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone�p TT a or Email ith the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: DAVID 0 & MARY NELSON - Address: 4701 60TH ST VV Taxpayer. Name: DAVID 0 & MARYJ NELSON :Taxpayer Address: 4701 60TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0062 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two to for redevelop t. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: C M SEBER & J I MORIN TRSTES Address: 4709 60TH ST W Taxpayer Name: CHRISTINE M SEBER JAMES I MORIN Taxpayer Address: 4709 W 60TH ST EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0060 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed L Printed Name Yes, I :am, interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: M D & K L GRESHAM Address: 4704 60TH ST W Taxpayer Name: MICHAEL D & KRISTA L GRESHAM j Taxpayer Address: 4704 60TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0034 No: 75 Loft Yes, support t e subdivision of 59 o into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: Address: Taxpayer Name: Taxpayer Address: Property ID: No: 77 M J TOKAR & J L TOKAR 4712 60TH ST W MICHAEL &JEAN LTOKAR 4712 60TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 19- 028 -24 -32 -0036 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment., 7 1 At Q Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming-to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: JOHN B MARCH & MARY C MARCH Address: 4705 SCHOOL RD Taxpayer Name: JOHN & MARY MARCH Taxpayer Address: 4705 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0047 No: 79 F\71 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed gel y © Y/ & Printed Name FYes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: R J CONNELL & H F CONNELL TR Address: 4713 SCHOOL RD Taxpayer Name: RICHARD & HELEN CONNELL Taxpayer Address: 4713 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0045 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed:.. Please,inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: JERROD C LINDQUIST Address: 5945 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: JERROD C LINDQUIST Taxpayer Address: 5945 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0101 No: 1 Signed Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. 0 Printed Name �J ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or . Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: Address: Taxpayer Name: Taxpayer Address: Property ID: No: 3 P R & W M ARNEBERG 5905 CONCORD AVE PAUL R & WENDY M ARNEBERG 5905 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 19- 028 -24 -31 -0110 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. No: 5 Printed Name F1Yes, lam interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: . Phone or Email with the schedule for; this meeting. Owner Name: NATHAN C STEINBAUER Address: 5913 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: NATHAN C STEINBAUER Taxpayer Address: 5913 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0108 No: 5 LAYes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: A M BURBIDGE & S J BURBIDGE Address: 5921 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: JAMES L BROWN Taxpayer Address: 5921 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0106 No: 7 Printed Name Yes, I am interested i in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council No: 7 Signed Yes, i support tnetne subdivision of 5945 �Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. r //") Printed Name r—T Yes, I am interested incoming to the Planning; Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me,via: Phone. or Email . with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: D W HASBARGEN /T M HASBARGEN Address: 5929 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: DONALD & TERESE HASBARGEN Taxpayer Address: 6213 SCHAEFER CIR EDINA MN 55436 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0104 �. Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment., Signed li,G Printed Name F-1 Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone gg or Email the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: M B & J D SACKS Address: 5937 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: MICHAEL B & JULIE D SACKS Taxpayer Address: 5937 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0102 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: RUTH SCHMOLL Address: 6005 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: RUTH SCHMOLL Taxpayer Address: 6005 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0079 No: 13 � .. . - � � ! V ✓vim Uf ��r - � . _/ Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: M E KRUEGER & M S KRUEGER Address: 6013 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: MICHAEL E & MARTHA S KRUEGER Taxpayer Address: 6013 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0077 No: 15 ❑ Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Fl. Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone. or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: JAMES T & ANN P SWENSON Address: 6021 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer-Name: JAMES T SWENSON Taxpayer Address: 6021 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0075 No: 17 . s Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: KATHLEEN M MORAN Address:. 5932 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: KATHLEEN M MORAN Taxpayer Address: 5932 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0006 No: 19 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed �a L� Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning, Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: MARY LOU LEE TRUSTEE Address: 5944 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer.Name: MARY LOU LEE Taxpayer Address: 5944 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0032 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name F-1 Yes, I am interested incoming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: A S M HASAN /M L STOLTZ HASAN Address: 6008 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: ASIF S M HASAN MAURA L STOLTZ HASAN Taxpayer Address: 6008 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0064 No: 23 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945*Conco rd Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am. in in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone. or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: DAILIS L GRAUZE ETAL Address: 6016 CONCORD AVE Taxpayer Name: DAILIS L GRAUZE Taxpayer Address: 6016 CONCORD AVE S EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0066 No: 25 F1Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or _Email with the schedule for this meeting: Owner Name: DARRELL BRUCE PEARSON Address: 5904 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: DARRELL B PEARSON Taxpayer Address: 4604.VI NCENT AVE 5 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 Property ID: 19- .028 -24 -31 -0092 No: 27 — Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. At Signed K. R'5) Printed Name r& V tA I' ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: PAUL) DONNAY THREE LLC �—� � )�igt� Address: 5912 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: PAUL DONNAY THREE LLC Taxpayer Address: 965563 RD AVE N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 Property ID:. 19- 028 -24 -31 -0094 No: '29 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed F1, Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: SARAH E MCCARTHY ` Address: 5920 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: SARAH E MCCARTHY . Taxpayer Address: 5920 ASHCROFT,AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0096 No: 31 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone Email Owner Name: Address: Taxpayer Name Taxpayer Address: Property ID: No: 33 or with the schedule for this meeting. K M FISCHER & P C FISCHER 5928 ASHCROFT AVE KEVIN & PAMELA FISCHER 5928 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 19- 028 -24 -31 -0098 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed flAyfilo/vo X Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone / J ?i ~ 91 t4 or YYIS.� +�01%� Email i� S f 4 A ! 10 6 3 with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: CORINNE M SCOTT Address: 5940 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: RAY & CORINNE SHARP Taxpayer Address:.. 5940 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property. ID: 197028 -24 -31 -0100 s t the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name F1Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: Address: Taxpayer Name: Taxpayer Address: Property ID No: 37 J A SWANSON & L E SWANSON 6004 ASHCROFT AVE JAMES & LYNNE SWANSON6004 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 19- 028 -24 -34 -0066 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed. Printed Name F] Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: JOHN V HARKER TRUSTEE Address: 6012 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: ROSS M ROBINSON TaxpayenAddress: 6012 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0068 Nb: 39 KrYes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council �. J meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: 'Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: D J CARTER & J M CARTER Address: 6020 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: DAVID J & JANICE M CARTER Taxpayer Address: 6020 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0070 No: 41 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name F-1 Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: TONI A GERST Address: 5905 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: TONI A GERST Taxpayer Address: 5905.ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0126 n Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name F1, Yes, I am interested in coming.to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when.this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: WELLS FARGO BANK N A Address: 5913 ASH CROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: WELLS FARGO BANK NA MAC X7801 -013 Taxpayer Address: 3476 STATEVIEW BLVD FORT MILL SC 29715 Property 1D: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0124 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed 0 ks Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or E m a i with the schedule for this_' meeting. Owner Name: JAMES D OLSON Address: 5921 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: JAMES D OLSON. Taxpayer Address: 5921 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0122 No: 47 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested,J6 coming to the Planning Commission meeting -and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name:. J C &.M B WEIDNER Address: 5933 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: JOHN C & MARY B WEIDNER Taxpayer Address: 5933 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0120 No: 49 Signed Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. DY Printed Nam I ' ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: MICHAEL GROVE & MARY GROVE Address: 5945 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: MICHAEL K GROVE MARY K GROVE Taxpayer Address: 5945 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0118 Yes, I s ort the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for rrredevelopment. l �j Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: ANN L TORGERSON Address: 6005 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: ANN L TORGERSON Taxpayer Address: 6005 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 734 -0057 No: 53 i� �� L-P24 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, 'I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone: or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: E & M BREKKE Address: 6013 ASHCROFT AVE Taxpayer Name: ERIC BREKKE MARIANNE BREKKE Taxpayer Address: 6013 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0059 No: 55 JNYes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Sign Printed Name F-1 Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: J PAWLICKI & E PAWLICKI Address: 5908 ST JOHNS AVE Taxpayer Name: JUSTIN & ELIZABETH PAWLICKI Taxpayer Address: 5908 ST JOHNS AVE EDINAMN55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0114 No: 57 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: PETER.0 MCCOMBER Address:: 5920 ST JOH NS AVE Taxpayer Name: PETER C MCCOMBER Taxpayer Address: 5920 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -31 -0116 No: 59 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed: Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. -Owner Name: M B REILAND & T OVERMOEN 'Address*. 6004 ST JOHNS AVE .: Taxpayer Name: MELANIE B REILAND TODD OVERMOEN Taxpayer Address: 6004 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0096 No: 61 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: DOUGLAS SCHAFF /NICOLE SCHAFF Address: 6012 ST JOHNS AVE Taxpayer Name: DOUGLAS SCHAFF NICOLE SCHAFF TaxpayerAddress: 6012 STJOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -34 -0098 r Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested..in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council ❑ meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: T S BOWDEN & E H BOWDEN Address: 6004 VIRGINIA AVE Taxpayer Name: THOMAS.S BOWDEN ELLEN H BOWDEN Taxpayer Address: 16162 PALAMINO VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92127 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0051 No: 65 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: RODNEY TOFT & KAREN FETTIG Address: 6012 VIRGINIA AVE Taxpayer Name: RODNETTOFT KAREN FETTIG Taxpayer Address: 6012 VIRGINIA AVE S EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0053 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council F] meeting when this will be discussed. ,'Please inform me via: Phone. or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: ANDREW BEHM & KIMBERLY BEHM Address: 6009 VIRGINIA AVE Taxpayer Name: ANDREW BEHM & KIMBERLY BEHM Taxpayer Address: 6009 VIRGINIA AVE EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19.- 028 -24 -33 -0071 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. J U. -Vj� (-s'► Printed ime EYes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: // Phone LO ��' "I`—/ b —'� �- or Email 3 3 6J w- l - G�with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: DAVID 0 & MARYJ NELSON Address: 470160TH ST W Taxpayer Name: DAVID 0 & MARY NELSON Taxpayer Address: 470160TH ST W EDI,NA MN 55424 Property ID: 19.- 028 -24 -33 -0062 No: 71 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two to for redevelopm t. Signed Printed Name . ❑ .Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: C M SEBER & J I MORIN TRSTES Address: 4709 60TH-ST W Taxpayer Name: CHRISTINE M SEBER JAMES I.MORIN Taxpayer Address: 4709 W 60TH ST EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -33 -0060 Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed t �,4VJ Printed Name ❑Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: M D & K L GRESHAM Address: 4704 60TH ST W Taxpayer Name: MICHAEL D & KRISTA L GRESHAM Taxpayer Address: 4704 60TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0034 ❑ Yes, support t e subdivision of 59 or venue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name ❑Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will. be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: M J TOKAR & J L TOKAR Address: 4712 60TH ST W Taxpayer -Name: MICHAEL J & JEAN L TOKAR Taxpayer Address: 471260TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0036 No: 77 Signed Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Printed Name ❑ Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: JOHN B MARCH & MARY C MARCH .Address: 4705 SCHOOL RD Taxpayer Name: JOHN. & MARY MARCH Taxpayer Address: 4705 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0047 No: 79 F] --t calminsiffia- © Yes, I support the subdivision of 5945 Concord Avenue into two lots for redevelopment. Signed Printed Name Yes, I am interested in coming to the Planning Commission meeting and City Council meeting when this will be discussed. Please inform me via: Phone or Email with the schedule for this meeting. Owner Name: R CONNELL & H F CONNELLTR Address: 4713 SCHOOL RD Taxpayer Name: RICHARD & HELEN CONNELL Taxpayer Address: 4713 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424 Property ID: 19- 028 -24 -32 -0045 No: 81 Ow e., W 0 ^'�oxaraogw To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, Front Yard Setback Variance, Parking Stall Variance and Subdivision, 10 Southdale Center for Stuart Development Company, Resolution Nos. 2012 -160, 2012 -161 and 2012 -162 Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolutions approving the requests. Information / Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — December 18, 2012) Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are proposing to develop the southeast corner of the Southdale site with a 232 -unit luxury rental apartment and townhome development. The site is currently an overflow parking lot for Southdale and is used by park -n- riders for Metro Transit. The applicant is proposing to develop the site with an upscale 10 & 6 -story apartment building; and a 3 -4 story townhouse building. A S. I acre site would be created on the Southdale site. To accommodate the above request, the following is requested: I. Site Plan Review. 2.Conditional Use Permit to allow the residential use. 3. Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 and 42 feet. 4. Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 to 6,442 spaces. 5. Re -Plat of the Southdale Site. To reconfigure the existing lots. Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 12, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests subject to the findings and conditions in the Planning Commission staff report, with the added condition that a direct pedestrian access to both Southdale and the new transit facility be provided. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 St • Edina, MN 55424 Since the review of the proposed plans by the Planning Commission, the applicant has met with residents of the Westin, and provided them the attached renderings of the proposed buildings from the Westin date stamped 11- 27 -12. Additionally, in response to the Planning Commission's added conditions, the applicant has proposed the attached pedestrian connection plan. Note that the plan does not include the direct connection recommended by staff and the Planning Commission from the apartments to Southdale, rather, they are recommending the connection be made from the pathway leading to the transit station along York Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -160, 2012 -161, and 2012 -162 • Minutes from the September 12, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, September 12, 2012 • Revised memo from the director of engineering dated November 28, 2012 • Building renderings from the Westin • Proposed pedestrian connections RESOLUTION NO. 2012-160 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN WITH A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FROM 115 FEET TO 63 AND 42 FEET AND A PARKING STALL VARIANCE FROM 6,747 SPACES TO 6,442 SPACES FOR SOUTHDALE APARTMENTS. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are proposing to develop the southeast corner of the Southdale site with a 232 -unit luxury rental apartment and townhome development. The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.02 The applicant is proposing to develop the site with an upscale 10 & 6 -story apartment building; and a 3 -4 story townhouse building. A 5.1 acre site would be created on the Southdale site. Parking would be primarily provided underneath the apartments and within two -stall attached garages for the townhomes. Visitor surface parking is provided north and south of the buildings. Primary access would be off of 69th Street and from the Southdale frontage road. Proposed density would be 45 units per acre. 1.03 To accommodate the above request, a Site Plan and Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 is required for the 10 -story building and 42 feet. Additionally, a Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 to 6,442 spaces is required for the entire Southdale Site. 1.04 On September 12, 2012 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Site Plan and the proposed Variances. Vote: 9 Ayes, 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdiiiaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-160 Page Two a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. b. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. C. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. d. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. e. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) g. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. h. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. i. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. j. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. k. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity - generating uses. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine - grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. m. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. 3. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-160 Page Two 4. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. 5. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. 6. The proposal meets the variance criteria. 7. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. Section 850.16. Subd.12. C. of the Zoning Ordinance states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 8. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue and would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 9. The City's code requirement for buildings to be setback an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and does not encourage an active pedestrian environment suggested in the Comprehensive Plan. 10. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 11. The proposed setback is similar to the Westin and CVS pharmacy, which were also brought up closer to the street than allowed by City Code. 12. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 13. A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan and Variances at 10 Southdale Center. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-160 Page Two • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 and November 27, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 and November 29, 2012 • - Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide an additional direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 28, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. A direct pedestrian connection to Southdale Mall must be provided; and it is preferred that no existing trees are eliminated to accommodate the new pedestrian connection. 9. The project must ensure that there is a public sidewalk to the new transit station. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on December 4, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2012-160 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012 City Clerk Exhibit A That port of Tract G. Registered Land Survey No. 432, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1641, Hennepin County, Minnesota, distant 281.80 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract; thence Southerly along said Easterly line and its Southerly extension a distance of 285.00 feet; thence Southerly to the Northeast comer of Tract D, said Registered Land Survey No. 1641 and there terminating. and Tracts G & H, Registered Land Survey No. 629. and Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 1641. and Tracts A & B, Registered Land Survey No. 1642. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-161 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A RESIENTIAL USE AT SOUTHDALE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are proposing to develop the southeast corner of the Southdale site with a 232 -unit luxury rental apartment and townhome development. The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.02 The applicant is proposing to develop the site with an upscale 10 & 6 -story apartment building; and a 3-4 story townhouse building. A 5.1 acre site would be created on the Southdale site. Parking would be primarily provided underneath the apartments and within two -stall attached garages for the townhomes. Visitor surface parking is provided north and south of the buildings. Primary access would be off of 69th Street and from the Southdale frontage road. Proposed density would be 45 units per acre. 1.03 To accommodate the above request, a Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the residential use. 1.04 On September 12, 2012 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Vote: 9 Ayes, 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. 2. With the inclusion of additional pedestrian connections, the proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit Criteria. 3. With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 -826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-161 Page Two 4. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only tota1.43. 5. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. 6. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 and November 27, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 and November 29, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide a direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 28, 2012. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-161 ' Page Two 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. A direct pedestrian connection to Southdale Mall must be provided; and it is preferred that no existing trees are eliminated to accommodate the new pedestrian connection. 9. The project must ensure that there is a public sidewalk to the new transit station. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on December 4, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HEN_ NEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012 City Clerk Exhibit A That part of Tract G. Registered Land Survey No. 432, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1641, Hennepin County, Minnesota, distant 281.80 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract; thence Southerly along said Easterly line and its Southerly extension a distance of 285.00 feet; thence Southerly to the Northeast comer of Tract D. said Registered Land Survey No. 1641 and there terminating. and Tracts G & H, Registered Land Survey No. 629. and Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 1641. and Tracts A & 8, Registered Land Survey No. 1642. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-162 APPROVING A RE -PLAT OF THE SOUTHDALE PROPERTY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are requesting a Re- Plating of the entire Southdale site. 1.02 The parcels are described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.03 No new lot is being created. Lot lines are simply being shifted to accommodate a new residential development in the southeast corner of the site. 1.04 On September 12, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Re -Plat on a Vote of 9 -0. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Re- Platting of Southdale. Adopted this 4th day of December, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk CITY OF EDINA T- e Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 4,Oi�1r,1,� Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com e .3y Date: November 28, 2012 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Revised Memo Review of Planning Submittal for Southdale Housing Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O It appears that all storm water is treated on -site; provide all storm water calculations that indicate this. O A developer's agreement will be required for the revisions to 69th Street West — enhanced pedestrian crossing at easterly entrance. Other items that need to be included are the public sidewalks along York Avenue and also along 69th Street West, and the intersection improvements at York Avenue and the entrance into Cub Foods. All of these items will be at the cost of the developer. O All improvements along West 69th Street will need to meet Municipal State Aid standards and along York Avenue will need to meet County State Aid standards. O Provide sidewalk easement over all public sidewalks along York Avenue and 69th Street West. O Provide better pedestrian walkway between project and Southdale Center. Sheet C2.1 Site Plan: • Provide plans and install an enhanced pedestrian crossing through the median island between the easterly entrance of Southdale Center and Galleria to the south. The Promenade Crossing at Hazelton Road should be the template for the design of this pedestrian crossing. • Provide a "No U- Turn" sign in the westbound 69th Street West left turn bay at the Galleria entrance. This will prevent vehicles from exiting the right -out exit at the apartments and weaving across two through lanes to then go east bound on 69th Street West; the route to go eastbound would be to use the internal roadway system of Southdale Center to access York Avenue. • Provide an updated intersection detail for the intersection improvements at York Avenue and the entrance into Southdale / Cub Foods. The intersection improvements should include enhanced pedestrian crossings similar to what is being proposed on France Avenue at 66th Street West, 70th Street West, or 76th Street West. • Eliminate boardwalk on sidewalk along York Avenue. The sidewalks along York Avenue and 69th Street West will become public sidewalks where the City will be maintaining these sidewalks. Provide 8 -ft wide sidewalks with a minimum of 8 -ft wide boulevards in these locations. Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 MEMO w9iN�1r� o e:� 0 A� • The attached turning radius indicates that an ambulance can maneuver through the turn - around. Sheet C4.1 Utility Plan: • Staff has analyzed both public utility systems to be certain that this development will not burden the public system. Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) reviewed the existing water main system. SEH determined through the water main computer model that the existing water main has capacity to provide water service, irrigation, and fire flow protection to the 232 units while still maintaining the same level of protection to the City. Barr Engineering (BARR) reviewed the existing sanitary sewer system. The additional sanitary flow generated from the proposed 232 unit development was incorporated into the sanitary sewer model. BARR determined that there is sufficient capacity in the existing sanitary sewer lines to accommodate the proposed development. • There is a note below the Utility Notes that states the developer is analyzing a "Living Machine Sanitary Sewer System" in lieu of connecting into the sanitary sewer system. Staff does not recommend that this system be approved until staff can be reassured that the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services along with the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency approve such treatment. • Indicate on plan that all utilities shown are "Private ". Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. G: \PW \ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \S Streets \Southdale Center \2012 Apartments \20120906 WH -Edina Review Southdale Housing.doc Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 —j I � Re6.Y00� L \0226 I / kt I $g S1 IC) �• lu L, S La229.04 �i C I V= N REGISTERED LAND SUURVEY NO. :.:£'::;E S I j 1�3:NN/F R.^:,? � wo, Nna.rtxT mr. 1-0 xrcx nis OwOrE9 aox NoaA¢xT scum. exam mix Rli )� —' � Jr —�LV�— I1100.1e¢E55 OR6Rm5: 910m1. _ 55,17 5, Rac7 t) xwo L� pL.kx9 eve P sva.flpx S69 �YJ6F /60.819 SSR27'45Y19'E n�iE Wr gRa6 Sft C TTSR 117 � u IS 1x0 0 240 1.7/.24 , ^ A55199D i0 xAYE A eEA101G 6500'1521'2 fP .� SCALE d 9EET I I 4+ 000 ♦ I nervy I—ily llat N eredmce rive we -I— of Glyph 5015. 4Nnemta SNWu of 1949, m mrmEm. I k —,IId Ine I1\ Ar c m y tier/ IolowNp Ocacrim Pr.Pny YWelea N Ne C—ILY al Hemcpin, Slate of YWNaotc b NL C.- ♦9 �\ TnV pat el Tmc1 O Rmlelam Lmd Survey No 432. NvmmN Comly. emb. I�np WIWI of aw Imo.Np vkm IN V. 5�_° ,,, r.v. r_.i. y BepMNp 't a p III m wa Eeelmy Ma of Trecl C. flep4tam Lmd SvwY No. fi47, XennmN CwntY• Mivlemla 1-1 2.1.150 leel n el we Swwm4 cam r el mN Trod: IrNA t't"DY tlan9 W &-L=y INe and Ile Se —y eNm 14lmce e \•v �• iH100 Idet: wane SurN[Ay to eNa NmNmal cans o1 Tbcl B, 4tid fle9etaeE Lmd Su—y Nw M.1 entl IM1ere crmNoWg. •:.i2 --R.:• aC aysdn �` Cb^ Narss:z9r _ r �2`rWrak M9OW/Ol' �� BQ619 ' /1592 ' N00'04'00'E / &64 I / cj TIMU B 4 x, flepistam Lam Surrey Nc W9. Nls•'PQ�l'� S i�Q '16'E •r�9 [♦ ^/ I/ i� Tr «t B. ReWtam lnm S., Nee 19.1. 1, N45 /% ryKo 1/ ♦, and \O / y I' Tract. A k 0, Reel —d ben -1 Ne 16.2 I( I ha Willy wol vela Rlglslam Lmd S.I.y k p t Mm mlatb of wa PWWIY 9ea/IEed mean: veal U fleplstae9 oYa +�db pj Lend SurwY .ae pmvm by m. v under my direst wpeMeian aN Ixel I om I mly l —d Lam Surreyv umv a Ww of we `0 \:. sbt. al YNneaw oaten wl. _ my of m_. ♦t•}l j� l\ ^.:..�. ,.�. Jt J�•SIT / 2 �— arL s xarwl Lab Svwrv. 4NnamU llm1.. xe IWO IT0 Il' L I EowA. uua¢sOTA 'WIT Nb, Re9lalaW of Savvy .m alpaeE mdmsceplm by Ilw Oly C-1 of ENna. YNn W. al a 1,, V mm ml Ntld ai a iR:•^. n �i •$� 04•� j lI / I b CITY COL M OF MINA, 4wNESOTA o o� ,1 f•� BY: Y„ yv BY: {.�M1� rAA C r A M1/ I L. TA AYER SENNCES DEPMTYENT. N mN Canty. Yhu w TY ' "1 C] I ? a papHa N m— entl piv rw. Iww gem pub 1a btl mabm m wY RepM1tvee La <Y. mteY n1�y wen lmee / ^ " • � / a E; cart y'prapirc xaamN Cmnly AlNib L "YEY CMSON. NamepN Caalr. 4Nm.ola i /1 ' ^•'' Y/ t p� +�) I Plaola+t lu 1- STAY. � 595 (Iw19). wN fle9—ad land Surrey M1m 9ea1 mpewd vela mY of \ V ^ 5g A V, I Q. aiman P. &— IleaaFrl Comly Sawyor \ "'1074F .- 1 \\ �i I I RF1a5TRM OF T em ITLES• H—W Cty. UN—II I NaNy caUly Nel we NNN RepNWm Lam Surrey N> _ ma TIm N wi. olliw w4 _day of 129 i m_ of o'tloQ —4. Nm'Jl'M5'� / TL I 4a Yvlln f. NcCmnir{ Rep4try al Tit1n C� \ r v .Y• 't, rr - �5a�sb9 I ._ -- ser4xsst re4az9 -- / bbiri ST. � �,yD9e a `` s9• / ».v - =' am N� D T.9IL q to se9vr16z A8 %A 7Rq /. �u�t�C--r-C) .SImLr,1SZ 1=40 � F!5�2�yr•IZ• �— �c OO' /1Y.•W�� __c1A61 589Y]78+R42YING 1 1 I Vi Yj S9 c� r 5497176E o-lz4.12ve• _ /__�-�L•N4 I w �raw•/z7.a R -1 J3 L -fl /5 CBRG J4'OSmY'W r4 (j n8 / \ T / 1 1.00 ,� \ av v I v g A R.L.J. ;;v. 5__ l -=R. /1 58952�4'W /647./5 P V V. l L �i r Pi 59, r NQ/L1E9J __I zc6z R:_.,. ^la �-19A ^ x6D1f24a rJSb r A L MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. Chair Grab% called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll I1 were Commissioners Scherer, Forrest, Sc oeder, Kilberg, Potts, Platteter, Cherkass NKilberg. ter, Staunton, Fischer Grabiel. Chair Grabiel welctudent members and gave pecial welcome to new student member Benjamin III. Meeting Agenda was approved as IV. The minutes of the August 2012, meetin%was filed as submitted. V. C( None VI. P e Yard Setback Variance. for Jim and Crissy Field, 7312 Wooddale Avenue, Uffna, MN. Tabled indefinitely. B. Site Plan and Front Yard Setback Review for Stuart Company, 10 Southdale Center, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are proposing to develop the southeast corner of the Southdale site with a 232 -unit luxury rental apartment and townhome development. The site is currently an overflow parking lot for Southdale and is Page 1 of 12 used by park -n- riders for Metro Transit. The applicant is proposing to develop the site with an upscale 10 & 6 -story apartment building; and a 3 -4 story townhouse building. A 5.1 acre site would be created on the Southdale site. Parking would be primarily provided underneath the apartments and within two -stall attached garages for the townhomes. Visitor surface parking is provided north and south of the buildings. Primary access would be off of 69th Street and from the Southdale frontage road. Proposed density would be 45 units per acre. The site plan, building footprints and site circulation have not changed significantly from the plans reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the sketch plan review. The one -story podium structure on the first level has been reduced in size from the Sketch Plan proposal. The buildings have been specifically designed, and landscaping has been upgraded. Additionally, a pedestrian connection has been added along 69th Street to the existing sidewalk connection that exists from the Galleria to south side of the restaurant area, specifically in front of the Cheesecake Factory. To accommodate the above request, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Conditional Use Permit to allow the residential use. 3. Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 and 42 feet. 4. Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 to 6,442 spaces. 5. Re -Plat of the Southdale Site. To reconfigure the existing lots. Teague with graphics delivered a power point presentation highlighting the proposal. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Front Yard Setback Variance from 115.feet to 63 feet and Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 spaces to 6,442 spaces based on the following findings: 1. With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linier buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. b. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. C. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. Page 2 of 12 d. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. e. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. f. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) g. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. h. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. i. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. j. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. k. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity- generating uses. 1. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine- grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. m. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. 3. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR.is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. 4. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. S. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. 6. The proposal meets the variance criteria. 7. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. Section 850.16. Subd.12. C. of the Zoning. Ordinance states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 8. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue and would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 9. The Cit/s code requirement for buildings to be setback an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and does not encourage an active pedestrian environment suggested in the Comprehensive Plan. Page 3 of 12 10. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 11. The proposed setback is similar to the Westin and CVS pharmacy, which were also brought up closer to the street than allowed by City Code. 12. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 13. A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17; 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17; 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide an additional direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. S. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated September 7, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. The construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access. Teague also recommended that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a residential use on this Southdale site based on the following findings: Page 4 of 12 1. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit Criteria. 3. With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 4. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. 5. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. 6. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. Utility plan date.stamped August 17, 2012. Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan'date stamped August 24, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide 'a direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 4. The property owner is_responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. S. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated September 7, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. The construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access. Planner Teague stated staff also recommends that the City Council approve the proposed re -plat. Page 5 of 12 Appearing for the Applicant David Motzenbecker, BKV Group and Stuart Nolan, Stuart Co. Comments /Questions Chair Grabiel asked Planner Teague if staff had any issues with the re -plat. Teague responded there are no issues with the re -plat. Commissioner Fischer observed that the re -plat doesn't, include Parkland Dedication and asked Teague why this request doesn't trigger payment of Parkland Dedication. Teague explained that this request is only shifting lot lines. 'No new lot is being created. Parkland Dedication is triggered by creation of another lot. Chuck Rickart, WSB was asked to present his report on parking and traffic. Mr. Rickart addressed the Commission and explained when analyzing traffic and parking he looked at the whole site fully developed. This included the proposed 232 -unit apartment building(s) and a future restaurant (outlot). Continuing, Rickart explained two Build alternatives. Build Alternative 1 included a right - in /right -out on 69th Street and a full movement access from York Avenue so the Southdale Site. Build Alternative 2 includes roundabout for the two Southdale site access locations on 69th Street. Applicant Presentation Stuart Nolan addressed the Commission informing them this project excites him. He said the location is "Triple -A' and his market research shows a need in this area for high quality rental apartment and townhouse units: David Motzenbecker with graphics presented the proposal highlighting the following: • Enhanced greenspace. By reducing impervious surfaces we have created places to help infiltrate stormwater. • Addition of extensive publicly - accessible sidewalk adjacent to the development on both York and 69th Street. Extend sidewalk west along West 69th Street connecting with the existing crosswalk to the Galleria (the same connection will also connect to one of the Southdale Mall entries). • Bike parking racks will be added to the front and rear of the buildings and will also be located in the underground parking garage. • Promote environments that make it safe and convenient for people to integrate physical activity into their daily life. The site will provide a fitness room, club room, Page 6 of 12 central courtyard with swimming pool, bocce ball court and the connected walkways. Green roofs. Motzenbecker introduced Mike Krych with BKV to further address the Commission. Mr. Krych explained to the Commission the Westin established the level of quality the development team wanted to incorporate into this development. Krych said their approach was to achieve a sophisticated, timeless, fresh look. The idea being that this site is at the center of an active vibrant retail area. Krych presented the materials board pointing out the exterior building materials are contemporary but timeless. He added when one views the buildings no two sides are exactly alike, creating buildings that appear to change'and move. Krych also noted that the - green roofs also add energy to the site. Concluding Krych said the goal has been to create a unique housing experience within a very animated friendly pedestrian environment. Discussion Chair Grabiel thanked the applicants for their presentation and asked them if they are amenable to staffs condition to relocate the pedestrian connection to the Southdale Mall. Grabiel said in his opinion the shortest distance is a straight line adding he believes staffs recommendation /condition makes sense and would be the "path" used. Mr. Motzenbecker responded they have been working with Simon on making a connection to the Southdale Mall, adding some concern was expressed over the possibility of losing parking spaces and trees if the connection is made per staffs recommendation. Chair Grabiel questioned if there actually is a market for luxury apartments in this area. Mr. Nolan responded that his company operates a large number of apartment units adding the rents in some of those buildings are as high as 5- thousand per month. Nolan explained that many of the apartment buildings in the area were constructed in the 1960's and 1970's and with the addition of a new dings century building this would create choices at another level. Nolan stated he,is confident in his research that in this specific area luxury apartment and townhomes are needed. Commissioner Carpenter asked with respect to the referred demand for luxury units was that determined from an outside or internal study, adding what was found. Nolan reiterated he is very confident with the research done on this product by his staff reaffirming that the market analysis indicates a demand for this type of mixed rental living; townhomes and apartments. Commissioner Carpenter asked Mr. Nolan his vacancy rates. Nolan responded vacancy rates are 2 %. Concluding, Nolan stated at this time his company is renting units that are still under construction. Commissioner Schroeder commented that in the past the Commission has granted setback variances to allow buildings to be built closer to the street if an active pedestrian Page 7 of 12 environment was created. Schroder said usually that meant that the building had active operable doors on the street. He pointed out in this instance there is a buffer between the building and sidewalk with no active storefronts addressing the street. Mr. Motzenbecker acknowledged that point. Continuing, Motzenbecker said what this project is trying to accompli is striking a balance. He explained this is not a mixed use project, adding they are attempting to achieve an active environment by creating layers. Motzenbecker said it is his hope that this would be a catalyst for the area; noting this proposal will create more of an active pedestrian environment than what is there today. Concluding, Motzenbecker said it is their belief that the main focal piece is the entrance, adding he believes that's where all the energy starts creating a more active York Avenue and West 69th Street. Commissioner Platteter said what he doesn't want to see is this development becoming an island. Platteter said he wants the "path" to the Mall to be more direct (as per staff) and he also wants a viable connection to the new transit facility. Continuing, Platteter said the attractive thing about this project is that the residents won't need a vehicle (if they don't want one). With this proposal its entirely possible amenities including a bus to work, medical care, etc. can be accessed without using a car. Concluding, Platteter stressed the importance of enhanced pedestrian connections. Chair Grabiel said in his opinion Southdale Mall is very important to Edina. Grabiel said during the past several years there appears to have been a decline at Southdale Mall. Grabiel asked if anything else was being done to rejuvenate the, Mall. Laurie Van Dalen, of Simon Group (Southdale Mall) explained that at this time the entire Mall is being rejuvenated. She reported 18 stores are under. construction, along with a new "food court ". Van Dalen noted the rejuvenating process is a continuing process and important to Simon. She also reported that crime at the Mall is down 30 %. Concluding, it was noted that this development proposal was a "key piece" in the redevelopment puzzle pointing out that the proposal adds permanent residents to the area further "knitting" the area together. Commissioner Forrest said when reviewing the plans she had difficulty locating the connection to new transit facility. Mr. Motzenbecker with graphics referred to the access to "bus stops" on York Avenue and West 69th Street and explained that part of the approved Southdale Transit Plan calls for Southdale to provide "connections" to the Transit Center. Forrest said as previously mentioned by Commissioner Platteter, she doesn't want this connection to be forgotten; it's important. Public Testimony Bill Lindberg, 3209 Galleria, told the Commission he lives on the 9th floor of the Westin facing north. He said from the discussion thus far he was somewhat reassured. He added his concern was if building setback variances were granted loss of greenspace /vegetation would occur. Lindberg said that presently he views greenspace, adding he doesn't want to lose that. Page 8 of 12 Les Wanninger, 3209 Galleria told the Commission his concern is with the traffic and traffic flow along West 69th Street between France and York Avenues. Wanninger said he understands the differing traffic scenarios but wants the Commission to ensure safety for both cars and pedestrians. Commissioner Staunton asked Mr. Wanninger if he ever walks to Cub, CVS, etc. Wanninger responded in the summer he walks; however, in the winter he drives. Waninger commented that in his opinion the round -about on West 70th Street has been successful, adding as mentioned "Build 2" (Round- about) could also be successful on West 69th Street. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone else would like to address this proposal; being none Commissioner Fischer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Forrest asked for procedural clarification if the Commission hears this request once. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Staunton said in his opinion the proposed 232 -unit development with Conditional Use Permit allowing residential makes sense. Commissioner Potts said he agrees with Commissioner Staunton adding he supports the Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit to achieve this project, adding in his opinion in this area an increase in density is a good thing. Continuing, Potts also stated he supports the variance, adding he doesn't want to see the building pulled back farther from the street. Commissioner Scherer asked what the applicant believes is the age of the average renter. Mr. Nolan responded that in his opinion the majority of the tenants would be empty nesters; however, he believes the product will appeal to everyone. Commissioner Platteter echoed Commissioners comments and stressed he doesn't want to miss an opportunity to provide connectivity in this area. Commissioner Schroeder added he also supports the project noting on the Southdale campus this area is the least used. Schroeder said he would also like the Commission to further study and define what we believe is an active pedestrian environment. Commissioner Fischer said he agrees with previous comments adding if one looks at Edina as a whole this intersection is in the top five as far as high visibility goes. Continuing, Fischer said this project also aids in breaking up the "super block ", adding he likes the project. Concluding, Fischer stated this corner is strong and there is great value in keeping the corner residential, active and green. Motion Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend Site Plan approval to include a front yard setback variance from 115 feet to 63 feet and parking stall variance from 6,747 Page 9 of 12 spaces to 6,442 spaces based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Fischer also recommended that approval is to include direct pedestrian access to the Southdale Mall via a 45 degree angle and to also include pedestrian access to the transit facility. (Fischer also asked that special thought be given to find a way to preserve the trees along that access route). Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Potts, Platteter, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer and Grabiel. Motion carried 9 -0. Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions to include direct pedestrian access to the Southdale Mall via a 45 degree angle and to also include pedestrian access to the transit facility. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Potts, Platteter, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer and Grabiel. Motion carried 9 -0. Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend re -plat approval. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Potts, Platteter, Carpenter, Staunton, Fischer and Grabiel. Motion carried 9 -0. VII. REWORTS A. Ske Plan, Frauenshuh, 7700 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presen i n Planner Teague repo d that the Planning Com/square ng asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to develo he northeast corner once with a single- story, 7,500 square foot "fine- dining" taurant building. Tres in size and contains a six - story 319,000 square foot o e building and a foot single story office building in the southeast corn f the site. The restaurant would be designed it dedicated parking spaces in addition Teague said the proposed buildi would An area for outdoor dining wo also be utilized. Sng up to 250 people, and would provide 93 e shared parking with the office buildings. made of high quality stone, glass and metal. Wided, however, is not guaranteed to be Teague asked the Com Sion to note that the prN ry issues with this request is that a free - standing restaur t is not a permitted use in th OD -2 zoning district; however, a restaurant is a per ted accessory use within an offi building. Teague said if Commission and Council are receptive allowing a restaurant in this location the plicant would needs to decide on two optio 1) a PUD rezoning and 2) Ordinance endment to allow restaurants as a permitted use in the POD -2 zoning district. Page 10 of 12 L gRKw 45STUARTCO Architecture Interior Design YOUR HOW OUR COMMITMENT Landscape Amfirtecture, Engineering EZZI J�D —jig BKV 0 U P STUART v +� Architecture Interior Design YOUR HOME. OUR COMMITMENT. Landscape Architecture Engineering Nop.m.= D BKV I� G it O U P S T U A R 1 T C O Archtecture Interior Design YOUR HO,MB, OUR COMMrrM @NT, l Landscape Architecture Engineering -� G3�� U ��19� IT Mil T- T B K V G R 0 U P Architecture STUARTC Interior Design YOUR.HOMC. OUR �COMMITMENT. Landscape Architecture Engineering L ail I -q, A O.A w"Im � u 7 !, . jj -f:� viam IN- BKV G R O U P 4SSTUART.O A�hfted- Intenior Design YOUR H OM i (A) - Architecture Landpe Architeum En�ineenng �� EMU •^�T.. �. . yL�r —,fir — Y Im !a-s�-oyY (,V rice tj-f A)oi PKaPbSCV� 001 1 wkA G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering 4S STU ART C0 YOUR HON!. OUR COMMITMENT. [ECROPMEP 0 Z 7 7 �--, 5 7 J a 90.0821' ah a� a� I' Nb ICj o� a� I� ) I I �'J I(a �J a g I� 2 R. Na5'18:79T /1a56 N REGISTERED L A ND'SUR VEY NO. p a d a� mTx R�s ✓/�:. —BARRX A'^r„:✓^ Mmea2xT 4T. MAR,m O[NOiES wOn u(MNENi F uNi1® vnM RI. a� 19.89 Y.E55 011d'AYAY 9'OYx. MNmES BEAWNC om MWlbPTION' a� M n N9YSSYTE � �y;� y JJ. E . X00 g90o I I I \n •E 9k M1 7',94 C 7. �4 309 E ' LHC FASTP-C TV TIIS fiEO mm Lq U wST, 120 0 130 2A0 /.2I .,. A9AUm TO xa.vE . BEMwc OF I.W.'tl•C. /y� e� SCALE 1. FEET 1 1 v� M I nmeby --it, tnel in accardmce .iln Ne amim• a1 Gapler 500. Mime•elo Sleluln of 19.9, as anmdnd. 1 n I—' INe ImawLrq dewLm prWmtY tiWeted in me CamlY eT HmnepM, 51ata al Ynnmte tp 'it . _.... Y el 20en_ Txol pmt of Tr«I G ReNislem Lmd SnKY N4 A03, Nmne in C .tn limn «. ly q E—y If Ine 11a 9 e {v / 5 w• ebt_q a am «nl an a Ea•ledyolinI .. tract N. Pvq..— Lmd —1 ... I i. H —bilin Cwn1Y. Y'vm flan' 291.80 ,ab Tr« lee Nm v Sarmmsl w e Seulnmly along veil Eoatmy 1we en it. Seumma e,lenom a •tm bf Perk v. CopM. Nwin C «ty w l m __. " / 385.00 (eel hence S4.wmy to the N «mee•t cemm of iroc! D. amd Regiatmm Lena SmKY N. 1841 on ware lermnelwq.ce /JOJ,br_- and J.J69 b'q' Tr «l, 0 k H. Regivlmnd d Survey No- 829. .r 3 and Lit K (� rr «1 B. Regimmm Lmla mr.nr N. 1e.1. 9AVEY DIVISION, NenneD'n CounlY. Ylrmevale hr ti II � a,d I Tract. A k B. Rv9i. -Id d y No. - em apprawd Niv Land Suvey xoa b day al ^ g 0 nnrmy ['Illy loaf lib Rvgialem Lend Su y ieao a 11t raprvaenlb— el lne prapelly dwi nmvdn: tndl lni>'Reegialerm a Land S.cve>n.a• Dr m,d by m r under m it p • end Nel I m e > ovnvad La1W SurnYm undm N - el In % 2 [D �— stele al M ne•am. Ootnd Nn __ day of 20_, I W9bm P. Breen HamePin Cwn1r Sarnrm Yer4 5s Hm m Lena s,r.nKr. Nmneaow Lic Ne. IswD :M.n.• C / I r — 1..NESOTA \ Mia Pegl•lmm Lwd Survey .o, aDDroKd ma etteptm by me U1Y Counc9 al Eai.4 YNneaela al a regelm maat:nq Nmml ntld / I C wa day et 20. Y �A \Y OILY COI.NUL a COINA. MINNESOTA v •r ' / -// r1 �r Y V \\ NJS•'0'11•E )2,9 129 N,0 JIWT I \\ r v ' I T—All SERVICES 111111, Mennepin C «nly. Mvmewla I — L by a ily na1 lore. by«II _ d P w am aid 1e « dnmd a Rn9i•m Ld rn. «ed ` 11m ='I171•M— ` . _.... Y el 20en_ 4m , .SaDYrJ9'E {v E� w8 Perk v. CopM. Nwin C «ty w l m GSN w,bS'O)•W L -79.&8 R.e10M SBT:_________11ePuly /JOJ,br_- J.J69 b'q' L Lit K (� ' (Or t') 9AVEY DIVISION, NenneD'n CounlY. Ylrmevale I PursumN to N. STAi. Sec J90B.5fi9 (1969), mu Regiaterad em apprawd Niv Land Suvey xoa b day al ^ g Nm''17 Yom: AACT 1. 0' A f sjSUNDE / LAND SURVEYING 3 I W9bm P. Breen HamePin Cwn1r Sarnrm b• 9T: PEUSfPM a flTlES, Nmnbbin County. Mmnveta I nermy cality Nal Ne aitnin RNginved Lond Survey No. ti wa lam r n ellice 1Na _day al Ymvn F. McCmmi 1. eq m el Till- , BY: yepuly `q rr .,."ii f) .... �. — 519'�7J6'E /6C9.T9 -- ).d -- md'77.P — =' 42m DETAIL Cr -• 'kb m 58p•IYJ9Y � r• \�RAd� C T B 8l, N I — ` 11m ='I171•M— ` . _.... 1`5.212 �. P'i119.60 4m , .SaDYrJ9'E {v Le vi w8 TLJ A /TT GSN w,bS'O)•W L -79.&8 R.e10M /JOJ,br_- J.J69 n L Lit -- ' (Or t') N89'4rJ1'W 1KS7 =' lM1SE M18 8l, N rte?`• ` 11m ='I171•M— ` 4m , .SaDYrJ9'E {v 519'41T.T 1 —_1417 ILJJ_._ 1 519Lrx _`�VSO•1221T w8 TLJ A /TT /� 7.m n ' (Or t') N89'4rJ1'W 1KS7 =' lM1SE Nm''17 Yom: AACT N19'.1:r1'W A f sjSUNDE / LAND SURVEYING Pt ` STATION Ci'nn,ections Option :' LEGEND ; Option k 4 r_n10u11y t Cut. ,�..�.�... Proposed Path: Entry /'Exit: ,. IN Y s/ fA�,i to-, - ✓' a°-• +Y.: ^`��' ��, :. ! r ,�''• * ,_! 4«.! a r� �. � . � 1 #� �«. �� '�'; .•kit �.' ' '• �4 *i � T', 4' w � �� A � � �, ,.. - �• ^, -�— _ � myµ. � - �. y44- # "" � i- �f�, v'i• i`� Stoll 1 1 2 r: n ,�" .aJh. r y :J, - +:�CS',4►:� � Irk 1 + , E! . C� Bi �"- .'� �• , ^eel E 11 _grjf I : /F a tkelt•1 F ?full IV I try �� d r j. a �. ,E► �trr t( . Eke '•. �E +■ gA` , rrntk'lfk kal.r r Haz eltine Road, � r o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 12, 2012 VI.B Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are proposing to develop the southeast corner of the Southdale site with a 232 -unit luxury rental apartment and townhome development. (See property location on pages Al —A4.) The site is currently an overflow parking lot for Southdale and is used by park -n- riders for Metro Transit. The applicant is proposing to develop the site with an upscale 10 & 6 -story apartment building; and a 3 -4 story townhouse building. (See the attached packet of plans & the narrative and plans on page A8 —A59.) A 5.1 acre site would be created on the Southdale site. Parking would be primarily provided underneath the apartments and within two -stall attached garages for the townhomes. Visitor surface parking is provided north and south of the buildings. Primary access would be off of 69th Street and from the Southdale frontage road. Proposed density would be 45 units per acre. The site plan, building footprints and site circulation have not changed significantly from the plans reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the sketch plan review. The one -story podium structure on the first level has been reduced in size from the Sketch Plan proposal. The buildings have been specifically designed, and landscaping has been upgraded. Additionally, a pedestrian connection has been added along 69th Street to the existing sidewalk connection that exists from the Galleria to south side of the restaurant area, specifically in front of the Cheesecake Factory. (See pages A58—A59.) To accommodate the above request, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Conditional Use Permit to allow the residential use. 3. Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 and 42 feet. 4. Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 to 6,442 spaces. 5. Re- Plat.of the Southdale Site. To reconfigure the existing lots. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Southdale Parking Lot; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Easterly: Key Cadillac; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Southerly: The Westin; Zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Westerly: Southdale Shopping Center; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.1 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains surface parking. The overall size of the Southdale Parcel is 80.5 acres. (See pages All— A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center (See page A5 —A7.) Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3. (See page A2.) Building Material The proposed building would be made of prefinished metal and aluminum siding, painted cement siding and composite wood panel siding. These uses are consistent with allowed building materials in the PCD -3 district. (See materials on page A23.) The applicant will have a materials board at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. Comprehensive Guide Plan The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "CAC, Community Activity Center." (See pages A5 —A7.) The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as "The most intense district in terms uses, height and coverage." "Primary uses include: retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings." "Mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites." (See page A7.) Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. This would be the first residential component on the 80 acre Southdale site. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum height of four (12) stories and 144 feet tall, and a podium height of 3 -5 stories. (See page A6.) which would connect into the pedestrian connection from The Galleria which leads to the south end of the restaurants (Cheesecake Factory), and not a main entrance to the mall. (See page A60 —A62.) Section 850.07. Subd. 24. states: "In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a Final Development Plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to Subsection 850.04. The expense of such improvements shall be borne by the applicant. A. It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property i) in locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan and ii) in other locations where the Council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. B. Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this Subd. C. Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. D. Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. E. Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the Engineer. F. Non - residential developments having an off - street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off - street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. Based on the above Zoning Ordinance requirement, a direct connection from the apartments to a Southdale entrance should be required as a condition of 5 approval. The pictures on pages A63 —A66 demonstrate an example of a possible pedestrian connection that could be made to the new entrance to the mall. Both the Planning Commission and City Council emphasized the importance of pedestrian connections during the Sketch Plan review for this project. While the proposed sidewalks are great, this additional connection should also be made. Staff would recommend a direct connection be required as a condition of approval of the project. This additional connection would meet the following Principle of the Comprehensive Plan: "Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine - grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points." The city engineer has also reviewed the pedestrian connections plans, and has offered additional comments and conditions in his review memo dated September 7, 2012. (See page A155— A157.) Transit As shown on page A158 —A163, the apartments would be located south of the future Southdale Transit Center, which as indicated in the applicant narrative, there are seven different routes (3 express) that connect bus users to downtown Minneapolis, the U of M, Normandale, the Mall of America, Bloomington, Minneapolis, Richfield, and Eden Prairie. Traffic & Parking WSB & Associates conducted a parking and traffic study. (See pages A67— A149.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. The level of service on adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. (See pages A79 A80 of the Study.) The Study does however recommend the construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access. (See page A80.) This should be made a condition of approval. The Study further concludes that Southdale would have adequate parking, despite the parking stalls being removed to provide for the development. (See page A78 —A80.) Based on the square footage of the retailer at the Southdale site, the number of seats in the existing restaurants and theater, as Southdale, 6,747 spaces are required for parking. The applicant is proposing 6,442 spaces as a result of the proposed development. Therefore, a variance of 305 stalls is requested. Based on information from the (ITE) Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, the WSB traffic study concludes that 5,952 parking spaces 2 are adequate to support Southdale. Therefore, there would be an excess of 490 stalls at Southdale. Previously a 759 stall variance was granted to Southdale in 2001, when the restaurants were added on to Southdale. (See pages All 50— Al53.) The parking stall shortage at Southdale has not been a problem over the past 10+ years. The existing parking stalls have suited Southdale well over the years. If the shortage of parking were ever to be a problem at Southdale, a structured parking ramp could always be added. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 54 overstory trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The landscape plan shows 135 existing and proposed overstory trees around the perimeter of the site & 400+ understory trees and shrubs. (See landscape plan on pages A40 —A42.) Grading & Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the plans and found them generally acceptable and offered comments in the attached memo. (See pages A155— A157.) The engineer's comments and recommendations within the memo shall be made a condition of approval. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 850.04 Subd. 5.E, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The existing utilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. A traffic study was done by WSB, which concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed development. As a condition of approval of the project the applicant will be required to construct an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access. (See pages A79 —A80 of the traffic study.) 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; WSB conducted a traffic study to determine the impact of the proposed development on the existing roadways. As demonstrated on page A79 of the 7 study, the level of service on the adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; This site is located in the CAC, Community Activity Center, which is described in the Comprehensive Plan as "the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include, retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings." In terms of the size of the Southdale site, it is underdeveloped. The allowed floor area ratio (FAR) on the Southdale site is 1.0 of the tract. With the proposed development, the FAR would be just .43. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The development fits in very well on the site. It would be located within an under - utilized parking lot for Southdale. The park and riders that currently use this area would be relocated to the new bus transit area in the northeast corner of the Southdale site. (See transit station "draft" plans on pages A158— A163.) The size of the proposed buildings would fit in well with the 18 -story Westin hotel and condominiums to the south, York Place Apartments to the east, and Southdale to the west. (See page A31.) 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and With the exception of the variances that are requested, the plans meet all city code provisions and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned above, as a conditionally permitted use within the PCD -3 District, which is primarily a commercial retail zoning district; a residential use should be integrated into the development where it is located. As proposed, the applicant is proposing to add pedestrian walkways around the perimeter of the building, and along 691h Street. (See pages A58 —A59.) The connection on 69th Street is the proposed pedestrian connection for residents to Southdale. This connection from 69th leads to the Cheesecake Factory, and the south side of the restaurants. (See page A60.) If a resident wanted to go to Southdale they would have to pass in front of all the restaurants in that area before reaching a door to Southdale. While this is a nice connection to the area, especially for residents of the Westin or the apartments at 69th and York, an additional and more direct connection should be made for these residents. The pictures on pages A63 —A66 demonstrate an example of a pedestrian connection that could be made to the new entrance to the mall. Both the Planning Commission and City Council emphasized the I:� importance of pedestrian connections during the Sketch Plan review for this project. Staff would recommend this or some type of direct connection be made a condition of approval of the project. The city engineer has offered additional comments and conditions in regard to pedestrian connections on pages Al55 —Al57. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned previously, the proposed use and density of the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as "The most intense district in term, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings. Mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites." The floor area ratio for the Southdale tract is just .43, when 1.0 is allowed by Ordinance. Variance — Building Setback Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setback. However, the City Code Section 850.16. Subd. 12. C. states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue that would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. (See pages A58 —A59.) The City's code requirement for buildings to be set back an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and does not encourage an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The City 6 Code requirement for height and some of the goals for development in the Comprehensive Plan are in conflict. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed building is not as tall as The Westin, located to the south. The proposed setback is also generally similar to the Westin and the CVS Pharmacy that was also brought up to the street. The building would add to the character of the neighborhood. Variance — Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance is reasonable. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 10 A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. The City of Edina does not want to require unnecessary paving for parking stalls that are not needed. The City would rather have additional green space and building if applicable. This proposed project would add both. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. Again, the City would rather see green space and development rather than.large parking lots that are not needed. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. Based on the parking study done by WSB, this parking would not be needed Subdivision The applicant is proposing to re -plat the entire Southdale property to create a parcel on which the proposed development would be located. There are currently nine lots on the site. With the proposed re -plat, there would also be nine lots. Because there are no new lots being created, no park dedication can be required by the City of Edina. To accomplish the re -plat, existing Parcel 4 would get combined with Parcel 3, and Tract B would be created from parts of Parcel 3 and Parcel 5. (See pages A35 —A36.) 11 Compliance Table * Requires Variance PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 12 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks 10- story building Front — York 115 feet 63 feet* Front — West 69th Street 115 feet 140 feet Side — West 115 feet 150+ feet Side — North 115 feet 200+ feet Building Setbacks 6- story building Front — York 65 feet 127 feet Front — West 69th Street 65 feet 86 feet Side — East 65 feet 165 feet Side — North 65 feet 200+ feet Building Height Twelve Stories or 144 feet Ten Stories & whichever is less 115 feet Building Coverage 30% 26% Maximum Floor Area 1.0 of the tract .43 of the tract Ratio (FAR) Tract size = 80.4 acres or Gross s.f. _ 3,499,610 s.f. 1,522,275 s.f. Density 12+ units per acre 45 units per acre Parking Stalls (Site) 232 enclosed — Based on 232 287 enclosed units & 55 surface Parking Stalls 6,747 spaces (based on 6,442 spaces* (Southdale) 1,194,731 square feet of retail,1,957 seats of restaurant, 3,447 seats of theater and 232 units of apartments Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Requires Variance PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 12 Staff Recommendation Site Plan with Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 feet and Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 spaces to 6,442 spaces. Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 feet and Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 spaces to 6,442 spaces. Approval is subject to the following findings: With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linier buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. b. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. C. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. d. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. e. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) g. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. h. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. 15 i. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. j. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. k. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity - generating uses. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine - grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. M. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. 3. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. 4. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. 5. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. 6. The proposal meets the variance criteria. 7. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. Section 850.16. Subd. 12. C. of the Zoning Ordinance states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 8. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue and would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 9. The City's code requirement for buildings to be setback an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and 16 does not encourage an active pedestrian environment suggested in the Comprehensive Plan. 10. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 11. The proposed setback is similar to the Westin and CVS pharmacy, which were also brought up closer to the street than allowed by City Code. 12. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 13. A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance'of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide an additional direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 17 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated September 7, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. The construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access Conditional Use Permit to allow the residential use. Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a residential use on this Southdale site. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit Criteria. 3. With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 4. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. 5. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. 6. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 18 Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide a direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated September 7, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. The construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access ILA Re -Plat of the Southdale Site. Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed re -plat. Deadline for a city decision: December 18, 2012 20 1 _ �• ...• •- H ■- -- IIII:IAI MM Legend V, City -Imits . I Isis• �� .. �s>.'si � � '�� .. a. a.r ■ mo �� t•.� �s e•� ./- Parks ■ r�. �� ors �� 1r � `__ — �� fit• � ■ Pamels 1. -ter ■_ C�....�r�lrr� ..m...��II11111�•r�11 11__ ■ ■�. -- a■ •_ . • x'11 -- 1 yl PID:2902824330014 Edina, MN,55435 �� • M aoln ( =i'1 24 6605 6606 12 616 6613 420 6677 16621 6621 6700 Blot 6707 6705 6708, 6709 i 671; �7 J 6717 6917 921 rg 7979 J7f15 6000 6950 4010 JD50 ]D70 8906 .xrsasa City of Edina 6430 '776423 � Legend N>6 6129 6110 Sur,un0ing House Number �43. o4J56']464?D 5441 Labels a 64416440 6445 6144 6445 6444 - - HAUse Number L.W. Streit Namx Latrels r•.ra a- __. 1e:y 0515 ff100 City Limits (,17 (525 GSr9 CS,U 2909 �/ CReks • 00 za ES21 12 -a Lake Names 21771710 JJ1G 6515 CJ Lk.. X531 7 5 .01 717 3015 3000 7015 7701 Park¢ Zoning APO {Ae1am>euPPxknq Diariaj 7200 6617 6612 6613 O xwo'. altn>i D-1, JI106612 1766216670/3 . N10 0.5 f:11isai OP.capn. tOisir..t) 3310 6616 6256629 6619 ■ 1100 -S{tub l0— !>Pn�nlllmM) X7011 JSJO ]220 6624'6376631 6677 . P00 -1 lPi nnai Caumand Oicriy) 66286641 W. 56644 ■ Pco -2 IPtinnn>i Damaaan-ial owl) 200 - (676 6645 00 301567W 6701 ■ P.:D IfPlann>i Canvc= nsl0iari_1) 6725 04 7056709 6709 na ■ PCO, P at Cemn:rvlD'elri_ -tl 70667136717 6717 P81iPbnaW tnduari>f Diaraj 7T 1 O 7716735 6721 PDD•111+b>n>i Olfo 700 O 19 6777 6719 PDD•I<Pbnaoi OM= ,7 '6755 6775 6777 ■ DAD -1 (Plano >i R:- _ii >m's/0iariaJ 7376741 6777 7456744 . PAD- 2{Pbnn>i R>di>n1LYDinvia) - - - - -- - -- 6775 6801 6804 ■ pAD•t (P:nnwi Acn:iee/c1 D:aria) 8056809 ■ 6872 PAD- 4(Pbnaci R —:.is0 aria) TI 660] 8176817 ■ PAD -S SPbnnci Red>ntii Oiari_•i) +N 6(05 6820 821 6819 6828 PSR-4(Pbnnci S_nix Dia,;aj _ R- 1(9aga Dvnl4nq lln''.) 6'�5 8316877 6676 ■ 6545 6844 A- 2(D— bb& —flinq Onl) 6841 19717 37W Ame tAq:.an>I &wi:40:^ar_t) I W L 6901 fi900 6901 I� Parcels b 60'05 9056909 6903 t 0 7121 913 6917 6917 y 19216925 6921 m 6975 9296933 6929 7710 m 1 9100 6977 6041 6936 945 6944 700170 0 7009 7008 7015 7014 7011 7010 7001 4 W 701930093001 70373005 2915 2924 2914 PID:2902824330014 * e Edina, MN 55435 it�Y9 A 1, A, is City of Edina 0 Z" 13 64di 5 _24 J6257 6511 t J;"Q 2 24 3 '655 1016 Ei 7 3200 1 i•613 C612%;1 ! 10 612 66,,6�2,S7?VT� 6620 2 662) 32 0 663) 0677 'W'23 W JJ 6626 �641 CC4 6"m Zug 6645 .t i J0156700' -K 67061- 6712 W 0721. J00 67296733'2, 673 6741 :73 72 45 6711 AL 60,04 CE05 6802 — . 0812 ca 21 , 5 :k. i 0 )s XV29 6828 31 0 09416845 6EJ4� –0 7979 7905 6900 1' �P 60 690.- 6709 ' 35 36917 2 14 V692 f 6225 6021 4040 21693 .92 0 Z?j_ 79 ic G99 693,6941 "I i 69.14 11121 _ 7 7 i 711 J 7.01 9 'o • !7 1 1� 1.014 7 gals -000, 71 .100, 7037 3005 2915 99 41" 1 PID:2902824330014 Edina, MN 55435 A3 Legend Swrm nding Hausa Number H Number Labels Stra t Name Labels City Ll.a. Creeks El Lake N. LA" Parks Parcels 2009 Aerial P W. City of Edina • . �• ..A ^- a'.3'IWIT�a,' - '♦J..1i 11 - ' • I ''• •3101- ' • I -16r3 1[i 2� 7 r _ .a - , r i 1 t-• f to r7,' tLrG EC rl• t L ��.'� jJ�ll }��j :' • i (' �: � Ji10 t 7 tf t670 x310 1a (47 '(EIS GC24 i_ • N' `C629'r'66:e y:, • •y' �_}.. -t J `^ i• r sWnma� T.. _ .I -., 0670 CF)l-'[6)2 f,��} {' 1 �'0'I 5s � �_ ]770 � F6 ?I e637S •t676 • Sri ■I CI • „ 273 0� t Ur I ccJ • Y• a �•1 !i1 - -, L62e U15 1644 } (202 \ ;Eig• 1a1s 1700 6705 TO 6725 61114 6109' 6700 dl t3l 0712 677f 3 � 4)233 �/ !/ / > .4 •' `t SO 6u0 F[YT3l A7 6775 6721 )00 11 6732 "0732 1J -,l 'f \ - •n�• •�l l / _ 'Ji � 1.1 i •6i55 • . \ �`i' \l '� . a: 6 ;ore rG740 ,S 1 ; . 7 6745• • G74, �a .. - • - 67 ' �6t111. 6100 l•• -: !� J S' y.1 ~- ` I ;, t —t, ' •J`� AR-. b- �• F'/I.' Y � I I I`_ ^� • aa jd e r5'� t :2iiy.� ! �~_.` -.� • Y6 e i -t.yl! , . _ I . - -•,. '�6c£ea2n5:•1lG1ce1et6 4 __ccoJ_y/• (661i. Le 12 + z( "cen 24 I' c l 7` yl i I l .+ '' beets. Icel,�lllLGZu h" a �.�.� >r t' Jr' ' .4. �: *aaa5•.ks'4�- i.: •:� _ 1 +'014,2`1124 :-,ia.•iF/rTaiaA7f471 P9•A' ss+u - -r.. - c9of. 63001 ! G'JOJI Y 1 + 6209 G'6'JJ110 2,1 � 6 �,7 ))) --" + _ 'I,�,r t-4'ii► k y 7112 r b91T �691G t e.�, 1 Llll� GJ20 ' "'^ � � 3:� ! ♦ 7 ` 'I�� es� 6925 69N Fr:.q: I_.• _ �.ry ' - 169295'6928 J460 fi775 • -A l�6J]]1y ilrll7 . - '� :: 2710 !. 1100 {6'lJl f G57G .. r '1: r i. i 67271 FT69•D 6245= 6914 :I% ' •.. 2w.rN �i ' °w•, 1JJi1 . °� iu1, It �' 1 1 • 7.1:.,t} ^�� I L. ' P, ,k +'',_..• � r. i ;;i F; + I ; .1r'rl � , ,j Yo9�'{t7oo`e� 2.,. :-� + •4s �_rh- alt; _(rccrms fir. n I •_ i7' '• G .,5n r •!F { •_ 1 bb r oX � a g ya PID:2902824330014 Edina, MN 55435 QII Legend Surmun6ing House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels N City Limits Crooks Lake Names —1 Lakes Parks ❑ Parcels 2009 Aerial Photo ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business o4 et ay 2008 Comprehensive Plan r L, Figure 4.3 e City of Edina Future Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 As- Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design e rZrvF-1 0 5 Miles 4 -25 14t Lpend ., _ Low Density Resldeneal OR -Offlu Revderiul - RM - Regional Medcal I-DAR- LUw Density Adached Resdenllal III O - ORICe OSP- Open Space and Pa,V, MDR - MedlumOenslty Resldenbal _MXC -Mked VS. Centel 'y PSP- PuhitcySentl-PpGllc HDR - High Density Resderiial ® CAC - Community AdAy Center tAH- United Access Higtway -MC- Neighborhood Cc —emlal I. Inmahial 3 2 3- 5 W 44th al 4 ' 2 Y 651h St 12 I 3-5 / uitl sit atlf`iiitru. -' t d" 2 12 4 Wa th 51 2 10 w ?Gib ait 3 l� O 8 8 2 3 2 LL Height Limits 4 4 2 2 Stories: 24' 2 3 Stories: 36 4 Stories: 48' 5 Stories: 60' 4 8 Stories: 96 2 2 9 Stories: 108' 4 HDR 10 Stories: 120 PailClawn Av4 7j t 4 12 Stories: 144' 2 '- ELIHeight HDR 9 u Podium Height 4 1\IDR w Tail al .l 12 4 OR W 77th al 2 2 -- — -- -OR- l nn..cl. oy OR 12 -------- I.!i0rniri� Cori Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights e F City of Edina 9 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update southeast quadrant Figure 4.6B Data Source: URS ® 0 0.5 ,wiles ti for liwng, earnmg,.�aismg families;`& doing business.j` !y 20Q8; Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines Categories MXC Established or emerging mixed Maintain existing, or Mixed -Use Center use districts serving areas larger create new, Floor to Area Current examples: than one neighborhood (and pedestrian and Ratio -Per • 50th France beyond city boundaries). streetscape current and Primary uses: Retail, office, encourage • amenities; g Zoning Code: • Grandview service, multifamily residential, or require structured maximum of institutional uses, parks and parking. Buildings 1.5 open space. "step down" in ht 1 -2 Vertical mixed use should be from intersectonsheig. i units /acre .encouraged, and may be 4 stories at 50th Et required on larger sites. France; 3 -6 stories at Grandview CAC The most intense district in Form -based design Community Activity terms of uses, height and standards for building Floor to Area Center coverage.. placement, massing Ratio -Per Example: Greater Primary uses: Retail, office, and street -level current Southdale area (not lodging, entertainment and treatment. Zoning Code: including large multi- residential uses, combined or in Buildings should be maximum of family residential separate buildings. placed in appropriate 0.5 to 1.0* neighborhoods such Secondary uses: Institutional, proximity to streets to 2 - 3 as Centennial Lakes) recreational uses. create pedestrian units /acre Mixed use should be encouraged, scale. � Buildings "step and may be required on larger down at boundaries sites. with lower - density districts and upper. stories "step back" from street. More stringent design standards for buildings > 5 stories. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer - grained circulation patterns where feasible. Applies to existing predominantly Performance Industrial industrial areas within the City. standards to ensure Floor to Area Primary uses: industrial, compatibility with Ratio: Per manufacturing. Secondary uses: adjacent uses; Zoning Code: limited retail and service uses. screening of outdoor 0.5 activities. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -29 IVARRkf / VE BKV MEMORANDUM G R b U P PROJECT: Southdale Residential Development Architecture InteriorDcs' Jn TO: Cary Teague, City of Edina Lxid_,cape Ard.Itecture En�ineeru'% FROM: David Motzenbecker, BKV Group Boarman Kroos Vogel CLIENT 1 FIRM NAME: Stuart Co. COMM. NO.: 1884.01 Group Inc. DATE: 08.17.12 222 North Second street Minneapofis. MN 55409 Ye;.epYian 6113A3752. RE: Project Narrative for Land Use Application Package (Site Plan Review, E, ,17.339.622 Variances) - Edina CPC Hearing 9.12.12 and Council Hearing 10.2.12. www.bkvgroup.com ME SITE PLAN APPLICATION - INTRODUCTION The Southdale Residential Development is anticipated to be a 232 -unit Luxury Rental Apartments and Townhome development on the parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of W. 69th Street and York Avenue South. The parcels total 223,838 square feet (5.1 acres) in size and are zoned PCD -3. The current zoning allows 12 stories /144'. We are proposing three buildings — one 3 & 4 story building for townhomes and flats, one at 6 stories /65' and one at 10 stories /115'. We envision 378 parking spaces for the 232 units, inclusive of both resident and guest parking. The development proposes 45 units per acre — a number highlighted by both the Planning Commission and the Southdale Land Use Plan as acceptable — and a Floor Area Ration (FAR) of 1.14. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of young professionals and empty- nesters alike. The City of Edina deserves the alternative of a sumptuous and convenient housing community located in such a key, vibrant district of the city. It offers an option for those who want to stay in Edina, downsize their homes, and be closer to shops, restaurants and activity. This site is 'ground zero' for higher density, more animated and pedestrian- focused residential developments to complement the ongoing improvements that both the city and Southdale Center are implementing. This is where people want to be, and we aim to fulfill this need with a development of exceptional quality and desirability. By adding an enhanced pedestrian realm with connections to both Southdale itself, as well as tying into existing connections south to the Galleria, Target, and Centennial Lakes, this development is acting as a catalyst for turning the focus away from the current auto - centric environment. The proposed development wants to jumpstart a stronger, better - connected, and more walkable pedestrian realm for this area of the city. ME Enhanced green space on site offers a respite from the surrounding impervious parking lots and creates places to help sustainably infiltrate stormwater. Extensive tree plantings will help clean the air and replenish oxygen. Planned high quality unit finishes including large open floor plans, oversized windows, granite countertops and 9' ceilings. Additional project amenities include green courtyard with outdoor pool, community room, and a cyber cafe. SITE PLAN APPLICATION — CONSISTENCY WITH COMP PLAN We believe this development is a good fit with the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update and many of its guidelines. As the plan states, "redevelopment projects should dynamically respond to the rigors of the marketplace, provide excellence in design and offer clear community benefits." We feel that adding a development of this density at this location is incredibly responsive to the current market and will bring public value to the City. The comprehensive plan projects that the acreage of high- density residential will increase from 229 acres in 2010 to 237 acres in 2015. This development will provide approximately 64% of that growth projection with an addition of 5.1 acres. Public value for the City comes from adding 232 units of housing in a vibrant and desirable location that cater to empty- nesters looking to downsize, transit - oriented young people, and families; the improvement of the under - utilized impervious parking lots with an extensive amount of green spaces, pedestrian connections and amenities. Another question the plan asks is: How can the land use plan foster transportation options for residents and workers who desire an altemative to the private automobile? By zoning this area for the height and mass associated with high- density development, the city is creating positive opportunities for transit - oriented developments, such as this, to be put in place. With its location near Hwys. 62, 100 and Interstate 494, the development allows easy vehicular access for those who have cars. However, the site also sits amongst excellent transit options — currently a bus stop exists on the corner of the property, paired with the Park & Ride use of this lot. With the lot moving nearer the JC Penney's, so too will the bus stop, however, the Southdale Transit Center is close to the site and services 7 different routes (3 express) connecting users to DT Mpls, the U of MN, Bloomington, Richfield, Normandale, MOA, and Eden Prairie. Walkability is also essential to enlivening this location — which . is situated near the center of multiple % mile pedestrian catchment areas — as outlined on page 20 in the Greater Southdale Plan. However, pedestrian improvements are necessary. One of the key elements of our site plan is how we are connecting the development to the greater Southdale area. We are planning to add public sidewalks to the York and 69th right -of -ways adjacent to the site. This will help connect our development to existing crosswalks and sidewalks, and to the shops, restaurants and amenities of the area. AA The comp plan points out the needs of Edina's aging population — how can we offer seniors recreational opportunities and a flexible transportation network? Both of these options are met with the proposed development. By siting the development at York and 69th, residents have their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more that are all within a 10 -15 minute walk from home. As cited above — the Southdale Transit Center, and frequent bus service along York allows for a flexible, less auto - dependent transportation network. Edina's scarcity of land drives the need to re -use viable, underused parcels in vibrant areas. By redeveloping this particular corner, we are bringing people, tax - base, spending power, green space and vitality to a location that is now an underused parking lot. We hope you would agree that the proposed development is a higher and better use for such precious land resources, bringing more value to the city in its proposed form. By adding pedestrian connections, proposing reconfigured intersections, and adding extensive landscaping and greenspace; we are hoping to create highly improved pedestrian realm that is safer and provides better access to the immediate surroundings. We feel confident that the development, as proposed, meets the following goals of the Future Land Use Plan & Community Design Guidelines (p.21): 1. Protect and preserve the essential character of existing residential neighborhoods. By redeveloping in an area zoned for high- density, we are keeping our development in context with its surroundings and protecting the essential character of surrounding lower- density, single - family neighborhoods. 2. Facilitate the development of new housing and recreation facilities that accommodate the special needs of aging City residents. By siting the development at York and 69th, residents have their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more that are all within a 10 -15 minute walk from home. As cited above — the Southdale Transit Center, and frequent bus service along York allows for a flexible, less auto - dependent transportation network. 3. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize the use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. See statements for #1 and #2 above. 4. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. By siting this development adjacent to Southdale, the Galleria, and other surrounding commercial areas — we N anticipate that the residents will, in turn, support the local businesses present nearby. 5. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. This development has proposed the addition of extensive publicly - accessible sidewalk adjacent to the development on both York and 69th, where there currently is none. We are also proposing an extension of the sidewalk west along 69th to connect to the existing crosswalk to the Galleria and beyond. This same connection also brings users to one of the Southdale Mall entries. 6. Ensure that public realm corridor design is contextual, respectful of adjacent neighborhood character, supportive of adjacent commercial and /or mixed use development, promotes community identity and orientation, and creates the highest quality experience for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. The proposed development's high - quality design and materials will become an icon for the City, helping to promote community identity and in turn creating an excellent pedestrian environment. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development Sustainable principles are essential to the quality of the proposed development. There will be extensive stormwater infiltration opportunities via rain gardens and the possibility of pervious asphalt drive lanes; we are exploring the possibility of a "Living Machine" to treat wastewater on -site; we are adding extensive large -scale trees and plantings to help with heating /cooling, evapotranspiration, and the calming effect that green space can have on the human psyche. Building materials will strive for sustainable principles and provenance wherever possible. Continuing on in the comprehensive plan to the.section focused on Citywide Movement Patterns and Public Spaces (p.36), we feel that the development, as proposed, meets the following principles: 1. Design public open and green linkages that bring both amenity and positive image to neighborhoods, corridors, and business precincts. This development has proposed the addition of extensive publicly - accessible sidewalk adjacent to the development on both York and 69th, where there currently is none. We are also proposing an extension of the sidewalk west along 69th to connect to the existing crosswalk to the Galleria and beyond. This same connection also brings users to one of the Southdale Mall entries. These additions will be extensively planted, creating green corridors adjacent to impervious streets. 4l 2. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity- generating uses. By adding pedestrian connections and greening them, residents have the ability'to now walk, unhindered and safely, to.their choice of numerous restaurants; retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more. This addition of activity and eyes on the street adds to the energy and vibrancy of the: Southdale locale. 3. Protect and improve the urban forest, including street trees and related landscaping, in order to provide shade and shelter for pedestrians and screening.forparki►ig and service uses. The, intent is to protect/re -use as many of the existing` mature trees on -site as is.possible. In addition, we propose to,add a large number of planted berms, new trees and plantings that will offer pedestrians a safe and calming environment, as well as screening vehicular uses. The development is also reducing impervious surface on site. 4. Create and promote environments that make it safe and convenient for people to integrate physical activity into their daily routines. By offering recreational opportunities internal to the development, such as a fitness room and swimming pool; as well as the addition of pedestrian connections to the surrounding city and its amenities, this development brings the safety and convenience of physical activity to the forefront. 5. Recognize and integrate Edina's historic landscape features, such as its stone walls and gateways,. into the design and redesign of streets, paths, and pedestrian ways. The development has taken some cuesfrom Edina's stone walls and is showcasing that material in portions of the building and on -site. 6. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine- grained and interconnected network of local streets and�paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. By adding pedestrian connections and greening them, residents have the ability to now walk, unhindered.and safely,. to their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more. 7. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings . toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. The added pedestrian connections provided by this development offer safe, pleasant, and easy opportunities for residents to access nearby transit stops and mixed -use destinations. 8. Encourage design of building, entrances that open up and link directly to sidewalks and pedestrian and bike paths. The proposed development presents a strong central entry court at the corner of York and 69t that opens directly to the surrounding sidewalk network. 9. Open spaces within new development should be attractive, interesting, comfortable, and functional for pedestrians. The proposed development will offer both an internal and external open space environment that acts as an attractive, interesting, comfortable, and functional respite for its users. Additionally, the plan section focused on Buildings, Site Design + Interconnecting Spaces (p.41), we feel that the development, as proposed, meets all five of the principles outlined: Design buildings to provide human scale, interest and variety that will encourage and support a pedestrian- scaled streetscape, as expressed through building massing, fagade articulation, materials and details. The way the building meets the ground, its materiality provide interest and variety. The building design provides a one -level podium level that projects beyond the main building facade. The podium fagade is differentiated from the upper building through the use of storefront windows and materials. The landscaping mediates the building scale with the pedestrian realm in a thoughtful and unique manner. 2. Recognize that diverse architectural styles can be employed to achieve City- building goals. The proposed development uses a modem architectural style, highlighting traditional building materials of wood, stone, and metal that reflect and complement its surrounding context, while contributing to the Edina's city building goals. 3. Locate and orient buildings to fit with their existing and /or planned context by framing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. The proposed development is located to fit into the existing context of the surrounding Southdale area, orienting the 10 -story and 6 -story buildings parallel with existing adjacent streets and arcing the townhomes to present a pedestrian -scale fagade towards the Southdale parking lot. 4. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. All surface parking lots and loading for the proposed development are screening with planted earthen berms and/or dense plantings that make up the adjacent streetscape. The site also utilizes the existing curb cut along 69th Street as an access drive that winds around the site, incorporating a second access point at the north end of the site to distribute traffic equally and provide additional access for fire and emergency vehicles. All 5. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. Scale and massing work in a complementary manner with the Westin to the south and the mass and scale of Southdale to the north and west. Paired with the Westin, the proposed development provides a gateway to 69th and Southdale. The use of 10 -story, 6 -story, and 3- and 4 -story massing allows the development to dramatically bridge the scale of the pedestrian realm up to the taller height of the Westin and the varying project heights directly adjacent to this property. And finally, in the High Density Residential Design (p.45) section focused on a "pedestrian- friendly environment °, we feel that the development, as proposed, addresses the following guidelines: 1. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. Permeable hardscape, where appropriate, is preferred over blacktop or traditional paving. Vertical "living walls" (trellis, vine - covered fences) are preferable to materials that absorb and reflect heat. 2. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian - friendly environment along streets. Porous asphalt is being considered to enhance stormwater infiltration. Surface parking has been consciously placed to the rear and sides of the proposed development and hidden behind planted earthen berms and plantings. Resident parking is found in two underground levels. 4. Design surface parking to maximize stormwater infiltration and allow for groundwater recharge, using infiltration swales, pervious pavement or similar techniques. Porous asphalt is being considered to enhance stormwater infiltration. Rain gardens and green. space are also being designed into the project for sustainable infiltration capacity. 5. Use striping, curbs and landscape treatments, centralized walkway medians and islands, and textured paving to clearly define walking spaces within parking areas and adjacent to vehicular circulation. The proposed development has created strongly defined pedestrian circulation paths around the site, as well as connecting to the front entry, and for residents, to the courtyard. Paving treatments, sculptural walls, and bollards define the boundary between vehicular and pedestrian environments at the main entry drop -off court. "Cuts" through the earth berms offer a unique pedestrian experience as they move about the site. SITE PLAN APPLICATION — CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIRED FINDINGS 1. The development as proposed will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract. We feel that the proposed development will enhance the surrounding properties, bringing more land use diversity and residents to the area enhances the tax base, and the vitality of the surrounding businesses. 2. The development will not result in an overly- intensive land use. The proposed development fits within the zoning code requirements for height and density at this site. 232 units of housing at this site will be a positive addition for the surrounding area. 3. The development will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. A traffic study is underway to determine the proposed development's impact on the surrounding traffic patterns. At this time we anticipate that the development will not result in undue congestion or hazards to traffic. 4. The development conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code (850.04). The development adheres to the provisions of this Section and other provisions of the Edina City Code. 5. The development provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. The proposed development's scale, massing, site improvements and landscaping create a strong, positive relationship with the surrounding context of the Southdale area. The results will enhance the existing use to a higher and better use that will be a positive contribution to the City and the community. VARIANCE APPLICATION A — FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM YORK AVENUE CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIRED FINDINGS The proposed development is requesting a variance of the required front yard setback along York Ave S from 115 feet to 63 feet for the main building and 42 feet for the podium level. That strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property. Due to the unique triangular shape of the lot, a factor not created by the applicant, practical difficulties exist in the limited amount of building configurations that can be sited on the lot. Currently the development is proposing adding extensive green space and pedestrian amenities along the outer h(�, edges of the parcel. Strict adherence to the ordinance would limit the footprint available for the building, causing a large elimination of desirable green space on -site. 2. That the granting of the variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Due to the unique triangular shape of the lot, limited amount of building configurations that can be sited on the parcel. Other properties in the vicinity do not have the unique situation of concurrent placement within the outline of the Southdale Mall boundaries. Currently the development is proposing adding extensive green space and pedestrian amenities along the outer edges of the parcel. Strict adherence to the ordinance would limit the footprint available for the building, causing a large elimination of desirable green space on -site and underutilization of the property. The proposed development does not have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties, since it is surrounded by large expanses of parking lots and buffered from other properties by both York and 69th. 3. That the granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Granting this variance would be in the spirit and intent of the ordinance, as the development is exceeding the setback requirements on the other three sides. The intent of the setbacks is to provide an adequate buffer for taller buildings against the street. The proposed development is creating public pedestrian connections where there currently are none existing. These connections will be extensively landscaped with trees and plantings that will mediate the scale of the podium and building beyond with the pedestrian scale of the walkways. This design keeps the buffering intention of the ordinance, but addresses it in an alternative manner. 4. Would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting this variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. In fact, granting this variance would improve the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood and commercial district by providing green space and housing where there is currently an underused surface lot. Similar to Key Cadillac and the recently added CVS across York to the southeast, the proposed development would sit closer to York, reinforcing a strong urban form and helping to create a strong architectural node at the intersection of York and 69th. A(( VARIANCE APPLICATION B — PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SOUTHDALE CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIRED FINDINGS The proposed development is requesting a variance of the required parking stalls for Southdale from 6,774 spaces to 6,239 spaces — a reduction of 535 stalls. This is effectively the number of stalls that are present on the 5.1 acre parcel slated for the proposed development. 1.. That strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property. Due to the 5.1 acre parcel in question being divided from the greater Southdale parcel, practical difficulties exist in that the space for the 535 cars is being subsumed by the new proposed development. There is no ability to replace those spots at other locations on the existing Southdale site without constructing structured parking. 2. That the granting of the variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Due to the 5.1 acre parcel in question being divided from the greater Southdale parcel, practical difficulties exist in that the space for the 535 cars is being subsumed by the new proposed development. There are not other properties in the immediate vicinity that would need a variance of such size, as they are not parking for a land use such as Southdale. 3. That the granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Granting this variance would be in the spirit and intent of the ordinance, as the development, in conjunction with Southdale, feels that a reduction in parking adheres to the goals set forth in the comprehensive plan related to advancing a more transit - oriented means of transportation. The lot in question is under - utilized and the loss of 535 stalls out of nearly 7000 would not affect the usability of Southdale. 4. Would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting this variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. In fact, granting this variance would improve the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood and commercial district by providing green space and housing where there is currently an underused surface lot. The existing park and ride will be relocated on the Southdale site, so the use would remain and not be altered significantly. Ail SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The Southdale Residential Development is anticipated to be a 232 -unit Luxury Rental Apartments and Townhome development on the parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of W. 69th Street and York Avenue South. The parcels total 223,838 square feet (5.1 acres) in size and are zoned PCD -3. The current zoning allows 12 stories /144'. We are proposing three buildings — one 3 & 4 story building for townhomes and flats, one at 6 stories /65' and one at 10 stories /115'. We envision 378 parking spaces for the 232 units, inclusive of both resident and guest parking. The development proposes 45 units per acre — a number highlighted by both the Planning Commission and the Southdale Land Use Plan as acceptable — and a Floor Area Ration (FAR) of 1.14. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of young professionals and empty - nesters alike. The City of Edina deserves the alternative of a sumptuous and convenient housing community located in such a key, vibrant district of the city. It offers an option for those who want to stay in Edina, downsize their homes, and be closer to shops, restaurants and activity. This site is'ground zero' for higher density, more animated and pedestrian- focused residential developments to complement the ongoing improvements that both the city and Southdale Center are implementing. This is where people want to be, and we aim to fulfill this need with a development of exceptional quality and desirability. By adding an enhanced pedestrian realm with connections to both Southdale itself; as well as tying into existing connections south to the Galleria, Target, and Centennial Lakes, this development is acting as a catalyst for turning the focus away from the current auto - centric environment. The proposed development wants to jumpstart a stronger, better - connected, and more walkable pedestrian realm for this area of the city. Enhanced green space on site offers a respite from the surrounding impervious parking lots and creates places to help sustainably infiltrate stormwater. Extensive tree plantings will help clean the air and replenish oxygen. Planned high quality unit finishes including large open floor plans, oversized windows, granite countertops and 9' ceilings. Additional project amenities include green courtyard with outdoor pool, community room, and a cyber cafe. Granting this subdivision would be in the spirit and intent of the ordinance, as the development feels that a tradeoff of a luxury, high- density residential development on this comer of the Southdale site for an elimination of a small percentage of impervious surface parking adheres to city goals set forth in the comprehensive plan and outlined previously in this application. This change would allow this developer to improve the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood and commercial district by providing green space and housing where there is currently an underused surface lot. kK DEVELOPER & DESIGN FIRM INFORMATION StuartCo StuartCo was founded in 1970, and over the past 40+ years has been involved in the development of 10,000 multi - family units, with a portfolio today that includes more than 5,000 units in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Omaha, NE. We currently own /manage a diverse array of properties including market rate apartments and townhomes, a senior housing campus that includes Memory Care, Independent Living and Assisted Living, affordable housing, and commercial. Local examples of some of our latest work includes: • Genesee - A 234 unit class A project at the comer of Penn and American Blvd in Bloomington, is a three building project -22 townhomes, 60 apartments over retail and 152 units in the 8 story building. All buildings are connected by 2 -story underground parking. The last building comes to market September 2012. • The View- 124 unit class A apartments in New Brighton opened July 1st 2012. • York Plaza - StuartCo owns and manages this property of 260 units in Edina, just down the road from the proposed site on York Ave S. • StuartCo also owns /manages 650 +units in neighboring Hopkins and Minnetonka. Our investors align themselves with our values to improve both their asset and the quality of life for the residents we service. We are diligent in our approach to deliver experience, consistency, value, and trust to our owners and our residents. Our commitment to these values has earned us a reputation as one of the most respected property management firms in the upper Midwest. We attract highly qualified employees and vendors, and as a result, we retain loyal residents who continue to renew and refer others to StuartCo properties. BKV Group Boarman Kroos Vogel Group (BKV Group), founded in 1978, is a full - service architectural, interior design, landscape architecture, engineering and construction administration firm with offices located in Minneapolis, Chicago and Washington, DC. Collectively we represent a practice whose expertise is cross - disciplinary and team - focused; and offers our clients a design- oriented approach to create architectural solutions. Knowing that our ultimate responsibility is to our clients, we design and provide services that satisfy the needs of each client's building program, schedule and budget. With each project, our firm continues to grow in breadth and depth, responsiveness and flexibility. As creative design professionals we engage our clients in the process of creating enduring designs that enhance our environment. 4l1 Some of those enduring designs can be seen close to home — Edina City Hall sits at the forefront; a new residential development at West End in St. Louis Park, Silver Lake Village /St. Anthony, and numerous new high - quality developments in Minneapolis — both Downtown and Uptown, such as: 1800 Lake, Flux, Blue, Eitel Building City Apartments, and Mill District City Apartments. A jb �� ' ®ri' ' I I . I � �•. Ilt , 1 111 11� ! f Ill II , t , li• }I III Ur ,It I I Ili ... _ III ��! , t nii'• Prefinished Metal Panel/ Painted Fiber Cement Blacl: Champagne Silver Composite Wood Panel Color 1 Color -2 Cast Stone Fiber Cement Siding Color -3 STI�ART,CQ isST�ARTCO 4 h a STIDARTCO 4A 11. .66. op— v Ali. I I 1 1 W AILS . 1 I.._. - — us 1 ;111 DETAIL ly 2Z T -,7; A �v,T �l A,/ /1-). 1 jw QN 'of �g A Q, 'CTA 0 71 R.L5. 1 4 . .0 ;r 4 7*9A C7. A S IF 29A 7" C p 11 B ki PARCEL 3 6 •10 PARCEL 5 N l5two -C ;-,g v PARCEL 1 , R', RCEI 2 FR.L�A= : S 7_1 =7 7= 7u4RrcawAw $OUMa4L_-M4U ff LIE M—E =--' BKV G R 0 U P Arclhft- Intem., 0e6p L-dscape Arzhit c,m Enginng Ron Kroo. V.S.1 Group I- 222 North Second Street KW pds MN 55401 Telep'p 612-339-3752 Fw:6, : 612- 339 -6212 STUARTCO Southdale Housing SURVEY . L001 :..t) cz� NROarnry nrscn snare pROPa5E0 ocsrnonae �� / � � Y� T" F aiku r • �; .-. � R •.,.r � .m1, ° ' .`.- .�..°..e,.� :. ",.' ., �.�..•�Wy��.. w m� x.d . .,, s .i .� .e .,.n , �A.,��.,.A. • .rr . v r � a i f ,y I W •-• r i w� "'fie.: a,. a 'M"�...I.uw.�.,..,:ar.:•Ia:. -•• �:�.« "� •.� . a- p J � }rs:. • -• - is•i -e in.. i- .wino y � e...ne. �l•..e. vu.r.�"iw.+�iee�•�•n w•' x.r « r.. , u � I f ° ,,.•,. o r x. w u.e w.e s.n.. x.. •sv. '.:�i.'r� �s.,.� la.x.: r.•'�.•..awb.C.: � : i::ln�"' �� •'� iC; •� -, Ill � /. ,. • R R R.,a. -« v.° a..., �,. � «. M' a u,. a'T". ,':. san .a•an \L 1 / °f yt•\ r \ / Q ai .rn rnang_ R w_y val�..roH � ,a�.. °,°..- „,:.,r"'.: (�• r. � , ��,�,% T� 1 �7E � � ..e,.._.. ,. , rnn+« � o°�°� ,`. ” «. «....,,. a...,�. ,... w ., ..w..,. r; •'�-' ��c.{'�qa l' ].11k a +. r�ir�car��rrer �.«.....e.,....�� van �.,kP e'..�, . >_ Y - '�•r•'� .-, `pd=`��II ��y�9P �-� � I• ' gyp_ ' � C� LoE�fa Mr ill r`' r m :.: ai4�.. ua��( 4. ....,....,Mx.."°�.i�...N....,s. _,.. p, e+6,�p� •-• lll�l}} +S'�� I I I II � � �P� 9�j � i _ o� •. � ....� e..m. °� a., :2; lit yx«e -. _ l I .d a I III I .., .,«.. ...M, ..n ....�,. ,.... o..x e«.. a om x. a.a.�a.... r i n i r/ n �a '.,� 1 II I g+ I I C ••r7 _ .. i�nurr• Ha�' \ / /in � a., -- I 111 n {e I r ... I .. a, ..,. .,...e _ °. >, u....,n�„.. .. \ -, �• \\ I I „rr 1'i �.-. = C w.",.«":7:. "a: Ir. Kv, F s•,r LAJ 40 Tr eYMcw :cwiµru:I / / / i I / _ If ... •... .i �...�-- e...aw, _�. u. sr•... .e.:<.... ,aeu :, 7 //r - / % / °I i� /I � er _ CJ rea ....� >.a�,_=m..... 7iCINl7Y MAP -. :i-• � -• � / / _ �y •^. ELI_ ! a F V. M •.,oar na // ' -, r CAH•_SNyrMT • '-' '-• / r/ s 4 / I ' �. m•ni_ °a,x u , tW7/LY GtI9.JS .,...• ` ".a�i e'u.x % •� �. a" see '� —_ —ems` —_ ��c a - _ ",.^'° - - `�y,i �rrti,1:•' / R w.. .r u. s,.�. .r un....�.. � � � • • - - -- ''4' — Atln'!S7!`F.NS69' -' . -• — _ �s- .,a—ww . g./ w r '•' R. L'11 w�.e w^.^�.0 a<r.�/n.wj.��.�eeaiam ._. �� .-. ._. \.-, � `\ �.... /I�..Y �.� 4 . ._. .,.. TI'•' � y\_M_` r' S'B. � ° /eF'•••...�'. ." /w I .w ° x �F a. lcia! ¢t... .,. a•. .,...,.... ."fir ._. r '°'= � / - r ar '� �,� <M �'�a� � \fir --� � w cUC"N f... o.� � �•" .-. .-. _,. L` ... %�,� -. .-. .,., r,.:q�i, ._ .-, ..., ....� 8971'! ST •... .,.. _ - � .� '-• � .,,. ..., t .-. - �iv°a�eunu°Gir�vcrF'�onwn�,c ,: R e.rp 87UAR70EVELOPMEN7 CORPORA? /O _ - -- — �- UNDE R, EO /NA MN 4 � • •- SO EN1E o / ^ °• a /n ti" a - /.; r.I �s•, L 4. p' I L... �•/ YV /sv L: / 1/ i r/v 7792 uemJ4rvnaL itll- 8UWWG MTA (wi➢or asrl .wrm vvmm� c..a m a °•a m�`w�` .� .: , -I-- INSET A ua m..asa.. uam nml.� 4� s r o®, a �`pir a �.v�n o.lm.r mo �,� r.lw M loo sv.mlr ..� am .nu ns -r vas® nmrs ml � y1 .m�+II .m � �j O..ID* mq rm vs wm�ml ar r mv,T nrT aw wm.* and .Damn laamauo v�xe.n rn.z°om"`r.�` °4L -� � �� ®W 1 tit, L i s r ex o.m.r mn 1 / I .cx na cam�r mranr .II.I a° or � °/ 6 I .;. o1m INSET / 1 9— h II IpW -1 1 es -- _-- .---- �� - -9 - -- - - qg ---- __ - - -- H ~ I W 69TH ST / H `1 I I TT k' I I i h1 M 0 Z 0 O jx i ¢ j\ U Y I � Its III BKV G R O U P Ard.b.h e kaeuior Ctlip lzndsrape Ardutwture g B- Vogel Group b¢. 222 North Se—d Street Minneapolis MN 55901 Teleph— 612- 339 -3752 m Famle 612- 339 -6212 vnvw.bkvgroup- 0M❑ and Associates, Inc. °fit : A Southdale Housing vlsns m a mreavw wn 9 _ SrM PLAN 1 n1 1 C2.1 I II I _I I I I -,I �Im 4 / H `1 I I TT k' I I i h1 M 0 Z 0 O jx i ¢ j\ U Y I � Its III BKV G R O U P Ard.b.h e kaeuior Ctlip lzndsrape Ardutwture g B- Vogel Group b¢. 222 North Se—d Street Minneapolis MN 55901 Teleph— 612- 339 -3752 m Famle 612- 339 -6212 vnvw.bkvgroup- 0M❑ and Associates, Inc. °fit : A Southdale Housing vlsns m a mreavw wn 9 _ SrM PLAN 1 n1 1 C2.1 V a Z? I- (@]ZPICAL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL W_. (@aEICAL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAII- �p PIQAL SHRUB/PERENNIAL PLANnNG pF7mu BKV G R 0 U P ArdvtectL= Interior Dcsgn Va9d Grow I- 222 North Second Streot Mh=poks MN 55401 Telephone 612- 339 -3752 F—i,M. 612_339-6212 bkvgroup. _ Is Lmau.-m SouthdaJe Housing mnurwm -Ron LANDSCAPE DETAILS L103 -fB,- 1 V J ---- fi ' -- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- q•: t , �oaont �y w m.a c meJ I 11 a N.I } yI\ =n (mJ 111 p�0�Q...i I — — W -69TH ST - --- DRAFT BKV G R O U P Ardutecmre Interior De* Bo— Woos Vogel k. 222 North Serond Street Minneapof MN 55901 Td.pha e: 612- 339 -3752 FaainWe: 612- 339 -6212 — bkvgroup.— ❑C❑ and Associates, Ins. Southdale Housing s��V'rwuvwmMineue�w �.aaNi...nb .a•m.mau. A+�e a,wimn vl: a,E GRADING PLAN SWPPP PH. 2 C3.1 o k- --F- StpY -N - - -- - -- -- -- -- ® \ STORY STRUCTURE TABLE SMITMY STRUCTURE TABLE 0 i YLLLL� STRUCNRE WUE: pETAIIS SWUCNRE RAYF' OF.TALLS r sm�s ¢ a w.T unn r zs rmrk er�ema u.x s..-m IJn �� m.o_va I i ,• �-Ipd � M. 0 1 sww smo-no b j- J til - -- - - - - _---'__•__'-_ - -- - -- - -- .r r5s� < i W 69TH ST U 0 i 1 1 vr� %' I IJn N m.o_va I i ,• �-Ipd � 0 1 BKV G R O U P Interior Design L-&—pe Ardvteoture &ginv ring eoartnsn Krom Vogel GrtRry Inc 222 North Second Street M--p.m MN 55901 Tekphonc 612 -339 -3752 Ncsh.le 612- 339 -6212 v bkvgro up.rnrn ❑o❑ IGmley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Southdale Housing l8� , LMUTY PLAN 1 C4.1 w P1 PLAN � r L - -J i I i i i i i i `----4 i i ii O V O a L(L P2 PLAN P x b >FIB II I IN b 4 BKV G R O U P Architecture Interior D"gn Landmpe AmhitecWm Engineering Do— Vogel Group Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55901 Telephone 612- 339 -3752 F—i le: 612- 339 -6212 •w,nv.bkvgroup.com camicwns NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 &1312 SOUTHDALE HOUSING oentovmm+ 't ARKING LEVEL 1 & 2 -P 1 & 2 11 /- K /j rt T-7 r DD U., o Lf bdo �� ti of % lit1 OF t ti r '• n .: i,: r1FR3ST FLOOR RAN •_~ 't,\ BKV G R O U P Ar hitecblre Imerior Dedgn Lwdxape Architecture Engineving ae.rre,n PC— Vogel Group hlc. 222 North Second Street Mmmpolis MN 55901 Telephv 612- 339 -3752 ar F-i le 612- 339 -6212 ww'ri.bkv gr oup.com O NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �.f t 0 &13-12 m yam• Lf m� SOUTHDALE " ® S HOUSING I L�I I 1� I O• I ' '� S j/ o Ile,er,wr awm.w.� v� o ..b,..ad.W O om F E r "fir I � _ 1 st & 2nd FLOOR PLANS \' A101 & +•' SENON_ OOR PLANr OM A102 tl IF S I IRD FLOOR PLAN I �rOO. I II -� II II L'SCJ O C�W-1 b 9 v Q M � a�o 8 v X10 . II II -� II II BKV G R 0 U P Archi[ecb- krteriar Draign Landsa eArchitecwre Engineering Boaman Vage1 Group Inc 222 Nar1h S—nd Stn t Mmneaporm MN 55401 Tdephonc 612 -339 -3752 : F.i.l 612- 339 -6212 — .bkvgraup.— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �re 0 &1312 SOUTHDALE HOUSING uve..xaa.- eo,aae=anna 2nd & 3rd FLOOR PLANS A103 & A104 0 c O �n- '� 9 A um / I�e ■ c� In WE �J 0 ED II I y k I � I II I R I II � 8 tl 0' W V I — ,n LEmEL 6 BKV G R 0 U P Architect, Interior Design Landsape Arch oire Engineering Boarrn Krooa V.g.1 Group Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapofa MN 55901 Uephonc 612- 339 -3752 Fa..�n . 612- 339 -6212 vm.bkvgroop- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13-12 ---0 o SOUTHDALE HOUSING _ II wre II I I I I II OHO ®BY CUAeWSalOn n0. II I Sth and 6th FLOOR PLANS III I o�rnuwen A105 & A106 e c f o— o— 04, p O ' II � I II I I -- VENTH FLOOR PLAN i ,I r0 au II I I EIGZ l" BOOR PLAN 8 i r -� II II II BKV G R O U P Archhacture Interior Design Lendsmpe Architecture Engineering B- Kroas Vogel G1 Inc 222 North Second Street Mhneapof MN 55401 Telephone 612- 339 -3752 Fa irnile 612- 339 -6212 sv+rvY. b kv g r o u P. mm NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13-12 -� SOUTHDALE HOUSING O mmnunox ��mo ua.pa,.r.wr� ah mmaoemaow.m — JJJJ asY COMMrsSIOn Ha B1EETlIRE 7th and 8th FLOUR PLANS A107 & A108 eavamnem os I i 01 k� u I r�rr WE �J V II II II III II b NIFLOOR PLA - 0 I Ij Ij I' I � b b TEH 1-.R PLnN BKV G R 0 U P AtchrteGrae Interior Design Landsapa Architecture Engineering Boam Kroor Vogel Group Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolrs MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 F.*nic 612- 339 -6212 . b k v g rou P.wm carnurwm NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13 -12 raoacr,mE SOUTHDALE HOUSING e�.�enna 9th 810th FLOOR PLANS A109 & A110 - BKV G R 0 U P AtchrteGrae Interior Design Landsapa Architecture Engineering Boam Kroor Vogel Group Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolrs MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 F.*nic 612- 339 -6212 . b k v g rou P.wm carnurwm NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13 -12 raoacr,mE SOUTHDALE HOUSING e�.�enna 9th 810th FLOOR PLANS A109 & A110 BKV G R O U P Ard iteceeo Interior Design LuW=pe Ardiiitemae Engineering 13— Vogel Group Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55901 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Far9milc 612- 339 -6212 www. b.v g roup. mm coxmrum NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13-12 ' vaoeerimE SOUTHDALE HOUSING rrmwunox nmeyurcywru+.pq m.rmem ww.nae•'wiw.�� ou. ur...ramov PR'WW MiE MTV tla Oe BY ox M0. 6MEEfTn1E ROOF PLAN Eneerxuweus _ ARP gLOBBWCLUB ROOM - OPT A BKV G R O U P Ardu ect- Interior Design Landscape Archited e Engineering Be-- Krooe Vage[ Group Inc 222 North Second Stre et Mimn -polls MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 F -dr,a] : 612- 339 -6212 wrnv.bkvgroup- corm4sarm NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -1312 SOUTHDALE HOUSING rrasmcsnan .4.wa.da.�.x.en ur"a rb.mm um..r.re conw�s,ori xo. x.�.� ENTRY /CLUB ROOM FLOORPLAN A A200 T BKV G R 0 U P h tiior Desip land=pe Architect ro Engneenng � Bearman K— Vogel Group Inc 222 North Second Street K --P.f. MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Faaunle 612- 339 -6212 —.bkvgro u p. _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13-12 SOUTHDALE HOUSING i n.ne mrr or ra, mn �.aw. u.x. w®nx �vmar aEaxae. arxn orEer $ima ROOF DECK cxu,xwmur A210 in 1 11 1'1 1 ■�■ 11 ■i■ 11.1 1 ■i■ I■■11 1[■■ W �i■ ■■ �__ !_ __ _I__ u,._i�1®1_. __ Ill 11111111! 111 Q,__I !1! 111 _m- @1!11!11 11 C!T■ 111 ■■■ 11 l �1 ,� -I. i■■■f� �11 7��1 1 1111 ��ti 1 ■�u:: -- -� -- __f 1!_ ,__[ I , 1 ilia_,,. @'__IA ll 111111 _v_ alm !l! �! � 111 i __Q111 1 1p -_Il ! I- -- 1_�I -� _I. 1. 111o? T C :'_I I._1111'111=! -': m r:�i ■® Qi ■i ■e r ■ t■ _ ■■ ■■ n� , T• ®i...�.��■n�t. ■� ■ .� - :..: -� ..gyp' - -� .11 �1 .10. 1 7�i■n 1®=- 1 me � 11 li e■11 ■1io ;,�: �� ■ : 111_1� ■��- ®�G�1. 0�1 ■mil �1YC�- ii.i ■i1._C�. �:��.i�1.ii�i.�.,Tr_ r 1�1�11111 111111_ 1111111119�IUIIIIIIn1 ■1111(111 ■1111�IIItlIJllltl�n I�Ilill�l l In II11 ■1 0 0 0 0 o c _ ■ I-hiiiilia!III ■ Ili111111 ill, No ili�al�1■ I"i 11111111' sm 1111 1111! I■■■q■■■ 1@ '1111 ■� H111 illnl ►.n -_ _ __ __ _ _ __ i ,blll O11111R 1111 1111 r "'1 �u dm♦(1111 "' 1111 1111�`i`I 11111 11111111. 111 " 11111 11!IE rii�l ■1■ IF-1' 11 j oil 11011 1111!x' NO .� _- '��1 1111 ■111 !111:, ,:! 1111!11 III :11111 !11111 11.1: ill !III E:' Hill mn 1111 :1111 ■11BI�i :, 1lll Io III ::11111 111111 mm 11111111:l:s ill NOR Ilnn i1111■iEN 811111 111111_1:1 �:o :1 Ill I i 11 _I -_� 111 I_t i _1 111 I gomm:�am C: :�i■ m� 1� ®■�!!■■ i1�u - �lG��m �■■��s■ ■■111ei91 ■�� u__�_ eat• ... �.� �;:..■ll■_P�_uli ■�.■eil. i ■i__ __ a I_l_■:_u�■■ -14-1, MIN 111 l A1-- -11 .111111 sell Mill -- _ui_ 111 III II ��' IN IN UP M 111 �11� 11,� I � :NIFIN! 111m mmol 111111111 VIII in .�• ■■■ 6711 11. L'1I ■11. :1•• n11(Illi 1:' :' !M111 11111ffia man Ill i in Ill'':':11!1!! 111 111 1:':' !11 IIIism im Ill ill Ii IN ill ''. moil �I� 11111 i11C' W� i� IM., iii --�_ ----------------- ------ -------- Mli 111 FAIN FM In Main, 11111111M �i _F107ri • WEST & NORTH 11— 12. 110MM M1111101 III ME! 11H 77 son mm 7aff 101,11111 � I I I micmimll aw mm Tm,—=§ 1 11 111111111,irm mill in M- 11m i, 111 "Ill mm BE 1; m 11111111, lilt I I mm 1 Ims 1-'- III I :,: I RII 111, im I I 1171 1111111- 1111 111 111 1 1 malummmummum Eff i I I I I I ! ',.I I mums pi I I I M is, 11 11111111 �,e .11.1 sur IP-1111M III! m 111111111 11.11.1 i.1-.1 P immum 111M iff 111 INK1110,011; 11 511 r17-mm mum A ffiffiffilimmirirroul WEST COURTYARD E n. n. nn M., 6016TH COURTYARD ELEV B KV G R 0 U 7 Interior D-jr Landscape M Envn-nng B- vov] Grow Inc North Second Minneapolis MN 55401 Tel ephone: 612- 339 -3752 F.I 6 12 3 _ —.bkvgiru.p.ccrn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08-13-12 SOUTHDALE HOUSING WEST & NORTH CM ELEVS 12. 110MM mill 11 11 1 11,111M son 1 11 loll oil ...1 1711 711 m,im IS I mm IN i��i�f:�: �i�II� :�: a �ii-a �,e o�� 6016TH COURTYARD ELEV B KV G R 0 U 7 Interior D-jr Landscape M Envn-nng B- vov] Grow Inc North Second Minneapolis MN 55401 Tel ephone: 612- 339 -3752 F.I 6 12 3 _ —.bkvgiru.p.ccrn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08-13-12 SOUTHDALE HOUSING WEST & NORTH CM ELEVS V502 n- --- - a� i BKV G R O U P Architecture Irrterior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa an ltroos Vogel Group Inc. 222 Noah Second Street Minneapolis MN 55901 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Facsimile: 612- 339 -6212 wwH.bkvgroup. corn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 -13 -12 SOUTHDALE HOUSING "T BY wet COMas Ha. OEETTntE SOUTHEAST CTYD ELEV 21"1 '�.,�. �: ,... � P z _�= s --b I --+ 1 I h.8 .'.L�OURTYARG -N DETAIL ,........w,�x dwo. BKV G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering a- lt o Vo=a1 C—W Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 fad.de: 612- 339 -6212 '. bkvgroup.conn SsTUWW Southdalc Housing u -� nFVmoea w. wn �wvm er aEOfo er off w. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION EXHIBIT EXH -0 I 0 coil uvoay-r r --b I --+ 1 I h.8 .'.L�OURTYARG -N DETAIL ,........w,�x dwo. BKV G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering a- lt o Vo=a1 C—W Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 fad.de: 612- 339 -6212 '. bkvgroup.conn SsTUWW Southdalc Housing u -� nFVmoea w. wn �wvm er aEOfo er off w. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION EXHIBIT EXH -0 I 0 coil uvoay-r IM S't i/�1 ��__`` 6E �'C�� f `i.aF'•`�W ''tf• � 4�f� � Ads :. r- rr rr • .� ;N �� a er a � � r�- Mr rr a 1 ..rr�•y.r.r �f: k rrp.q, .moo' —s+..� .. - r 16 41 vp 00 LEGEND i c. ^.A Existing Path: NA Proposed Path: LIQUOR cut x al\ ti' i f •eiT iL -L. P ..,_ � 'l;A'q•� / _ rf ✓".'..��s , as {..w� z L L rn hR.`N sR Al \ ' ► as %3' �� ,+� � l' �Y � .'t-r'.» h , ./ ,..r a _ j GALLERIA t Connections LEGEND i c. ^.A Existing Path: NA Proposed Path: LIQUOR cut x al\ ti' i f •eiT iL -L. P ..,_ � 'l;A'q•� / _ rf ✓".'..��s , as {..w� z L L rn hR.`N sR Al \ ' ► as %3' �� ,+� � l' �Y � .'t-r'.» h , ./ ,..r a _ j GALLERIA t 7k wel 1 ' � "'p a 1• 7 � J ',jj f• � i 1 q1� • 1 1 ..4 .€ v �= n it 1'69 y T '44 'i-- w"I'll, r5"-, mew =` - C.-� I Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed addition of the Southdale Residential apartments. would have on the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking, site circulation and the adjacent roadway system. Th&Mte is located in the northwest quadrant of 691" Street and York Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed plan includes the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. Existing access to this area of the Southdale Shopping Center is through two existing 3/4 movement intersections and one right -in only intersection on 69`" Street and one site entrance and one site exit intersection on York Avenue. The Southdale Residential project is proposing to modify the access on 69`" Street adding a right - out at the location of the current right -in access, and modifying the existing south exit driveway on York Avenue to a full movement intersection. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and 66`" Street • York Avenue and Southdale site entrance and exit intersections • York Avenue and 69`" Street • 69`" Street and Southdale site right in only driveway • 69t" Street and Southdale site east and west entrance intersections • 69`" Street and France Avenue Southdale site ring.road and Southdale access driveway from 69`" Street • Southdale site ring road and Southdale access exit driveway to York Avenue The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300. . ® Minneapolis, MN 55416 & Associates, Inc. Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum DATE: September 4, 2012 TO: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering City of Edina FROM. Charles Rickart, P E., PTOE RE. Southdale Residential Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -34 Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed addition of the Southdale Residential apartments. would have on the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking, site circulation and the adjacent roadway system. Th&Mte is located in the northwest quadrant of 691" Street and York Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed plan includes the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. Existing access to this area of the Southdale Shopping Center is through two existing 3/4 movement intersections and one right -in only intersection on 69`" Street and one site entrance and one site exit intersection on York Avenue. The Southdale Residential project is proposing to modify the access on 69`" Street adding a right - out at the location of the current right -in access, and modifying the existing south exit driveway on York Avenue to a full movement intersection. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and 66`" Street • York Avenue and Southdale site entrance and exit intersections • York Avenue and 69`" Street • 69`" Street and Southdale site right in only driveway • 69t" Street and Southdale site east and west entrance intersections • 69`" Street and France Avenue Southdale site ring.road and Southdale access driveway from 69`" Street • Southdale site ring road and Southdale access exit driveway to York Avenue The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 2 of 15 Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic control include: York Avenue (CSAH 31) is north/south a 4 -lane divided `B" Minor Arterial roadway. Primary access to York Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. 69`h Street is an east/west City 4 -lane divided collector roadway. Access to adjacent developments including the Southdale Shopping Center and the Galleria is provided from this roadway. The speed limit posted on 69`h Street is 30 mph. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection are as follows: York Avenue at 66`h Street - Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching 66`h St — one free right, two through, one left NB York Ave approaching 66`h St — one free right, two through, two left EB 66`h St approaching York Ave — one free right, two through, two left WB 66`h St approaching York Ave — one free right, two through, two left York Avenue at Southdale Site Entrance — Sidestreet Stop Sign control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through NB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one continuous right, two through, one left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right out only York Avenue at Southdale Site Exit — Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — two through, one left NB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through EB Site Entrance approaching York Ave — one right/through, two left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right, two left York Avenue at 69`h Street — Traffic Signal contro SB York Ave approaching 69`h St — one through /right, three through, one left NB York Ave approaching 69`h St — one right, three through, one left EB 69`h St approaching York Ave — one through /right, one left WB 69`h St approaching York Ave — one right, one through, one left 69`h Street at Southdale Right -In Only — No Traffic control EB 69`h St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through 69`h Street at East Southdale / Galleria Site Access — Sidestreet Stop Sign control EB 69`h St approaching Site Access — one through /right, one through, one left WB 69`h St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through, one left SB Southdale Access approaching 69`h St — one right only NB Galleria Access approaching 69`h St - one right only .kV' Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 3 of 15 69th Street at West Southdale / Galleria Site Access - Sidestreet Stop Sign control EB 69th St approaching Site Access — one through /right, one through WB 69th St approaching Site Access -one through/right,.one through; one left SB Southdale Access approaching 69th St — one right, one through/left NB Galleria Access approaching 691h St - one right/through/left 691h Street at France Avenue - Traffic Signal control EB 69th St approaching France Ave — one right, two through, one left - WB 69th: St approaching France Ave —one free right, two through, one left SB France Ave approaching 69th St— one free right, three through, one left NB: France Ave approaching 69th St — one free right, three through, one left PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach .counts were conducted during the weeks on July 8th — 21St, 2012. AM peak hour counts were previously conducted by Hennepin County at the intersections along France Avenue. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lower than the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hours were analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part_ of this traffic study. Figure 4 shows the existing 2012 PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. The traffic count data is included in the Appendix. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2012) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However, in order to account for. some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic to the 2014 and 203,0 analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic. Additional: Southdale. Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about.the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that following the renovations, the mall would have and additional 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space occupied by 2014 and that the background. trip generation for the mall property was the same for the 2014 and 2030 analysis. h�q Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 4 of 15 Future Restaurant Development — A future restaurant is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will be developed by 2014 and that the background trip generation for the restaurant will be the same for the 2014 and 2030 analysis scenarios. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional site traffic are based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Table 1- Estimated Additional Background Trip Generation Use Sizes PM Peak Hour Satur ay Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Shopping Center 143,880 537 263 274 704 366 338 Restaurant 8000 90 53 37 113 60 53 Total New Trips 1 627 1 316 311 1 817 1 426 1 391 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition Development Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed Southdale Residential project is shown below in Table 2. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. In addition, it was assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new and that no adjustments were made for dual purpose or pass -by /diverted trips. This also will provide for a worst case traffic condition. Table 2 - Estimated Development Site Trip Generation Use Size units PM Peak Hour Satu day Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Apartments 232 82 50 32 93 53 40 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition A70 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 5 of 15 Trip Distribution Site- generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major .routes that serve it. In general the Trip Distribution.was assumed, 30% to the north, 40% to the south, 15% to the east and 15 % to the west. Additional Southdale:Center background trips were distributed to 66th Street, 69th Street, York Avenue,. or France Avenue based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. Where one of the adjacent roadways had multiple entries or exits into the mall property, entering or exiting volumes were evenly split across both locations: The generated trips for the future restaurant development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on France Avenue or 691h Street, and were assigned based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway: The generated trips for the proposed Southdale Residential development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on 691h Street or York Avenue, and were assigned based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2014 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. Four improvement alternatives were evaluated. 1. Existing — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 2. No Build — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 3. Build Alternative 1 — Proposed roadway improvements from the development site plan including: a right-in/right -out on 691h Street; full.movement access on .York Avenue, and; revisions to the Southdale Center circulation. roadway adjacent to the development. Figure 5 shows these improvements. 4. Build Alternative 2 — Proposed roadway improvements including two full movement roundabouts on 691h Street. Figure 6 shows these improvements. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non - development traffic growth to the existing 2012 traffic counts to determine the "No- Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated Southdale Residential development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 7- 12 shows the projected 2014 and 2030 No -Build and Build PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. Alf Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 6 of 15 Traffic Operations Existing and /or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the intersections and access point on 691h Street and York Avenue. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 1. Existing 2012 Conditions 2. Projected 2014 No Build 3. Projected 2014 Build Alternative 1 4. Projected 2014 Build Alternative 2 5. Projected 2030 No Build 6. Projected 2030 Build Alternative 1 7. Projected 2030 Build Alternative 2 This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Analysis Methodoloey The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and /or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through - street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. A-] I. Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 7 of 15 Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Kl3 Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A <10 <10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20-35 15-25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80 >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Kl3 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 8 of 15 Existinz Level of Service Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS D or better during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours with all movements operating at LOS E or better. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table 4 - Existing Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2014 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Residential site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables S - 7. Detailed tables showing the LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Intersection Delay Delay LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 38 C (E) 27 York Ave at Southdale Entrance A (B) 4 A (A) 4 York Ave at Southdale Exit C (E) 22 B (D) 19 York Ave at 691h St C (E) 32 C (E) 29 69th St at Southdale Right -In A (A) 2 A (A) 2 69th St at Southdale East Access A (A) 2 A (A) 3 69th St at Southdale West Access A (C) 5 A (D) 7 69th St at France Ave C (E) 30 C (E) 26 Mall Circulation Rd at (69t St) A (A) 3 A (A) 2 East Access Mall Circulation Rd at Park n Ride A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Mall Circulation Rd at (York Ave) A (A) 1 A (A) 1 South Access C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2014 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Residential site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables S - 7. Detailed tables showing the LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 9 of 15 Table S — No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections at 66th Street and York Avenue, York Avenue and 691h Street and 691h Street at France Avenue. Table S — No Build Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. h ?5' 2014 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 38 C (E) 32 D (E) 43 C (E) 33 York Ave at Southdale A (B) 4 A (B) 5 A (B) 4 A (B) 5 Entrance York Ave at Southdale C (E) 22 C (E) 29 C (E) 22 C (E) 30 Exit York Ave at 69th St D (E) 36 D (E) 38 D (E) 38 D (E) 40 69th St at Southdale A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Right -In 69' St at Southdale East A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 Access 69t St at Southdale West A (C) 6 A (E) 10 A (D) 6 B (E) 10 Access 69th St at France Ave C (E) 30 C (E) 29 C (E) 31 C (E) 30 Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 3 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 A (A) 2 (691h St ) East Access Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Park n Ride Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 1 A (A) 2 A (A) 1 A (A) 2 (York Ave) South Access C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. h ?5' Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 10 of 15 Table 6— Build Alternative], shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, except the York Avenue intersection with the revised full movement access to Southdale, which will be operating at an overall LOS E in 2030. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the no- build condition. At the intersection of 69th Street and the Southdale East access the projected 2014 eastbound left turn volume from 691h Street into the mall is 320 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour. Although the LOS and delays do not indicate an issue, the rule of thumb for considering additional improvements is 300 vehicles per hour in a left turn lane. Currently there is no eastbound left turn lane provided at the 691h Street and Southdale West access intersection. Adding an eastbound left turn lane at the Southdale West access would distribute the traffic between the two access locations, providing a low cost solution to improve this potential issue. Table 6 — Build Alternative I Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 06 2014 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec/veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 38 C (E) 32 D (E) 43 C (E) 33 York Ave at Southdale A (B) 5 A (B) 5 A (B) 5 A (C) 7 Entrance York Ave at Southdale D (E) 43 D (E) 49 D (E) 50 E (E) 58 Full Movement Access York Ave at 691h St D (E) 36 D (E) 38 D (E) 38 D (E) 40 69'h St at Southdale A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Right- In/Right -out 69 St at Southdale East A (A) 3 A (A) 4 A (A) 3 A (A) 4 Access 69t St at Southdale West A (C) 6 A (E) 9 A (D) 6 A (E) 10 Access 691h St at France Ave C (E) 30 C (E) 29 C (E) 31 C (E) 30 Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 3 A (B) 3 A (A) 3 A (B) 3 691h St East Access Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Development Driveway Mall Circulation Rd at B (C) 12 A (D) 13 A (D) 14 C (D) 15 (York Ave) South Access C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 06 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 11 of 15 Table 7— Build Alternative 2, has similar results as Build Alternative 1 showing that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, except the York Avenue intersection with the revised full movement access to Southdale, which will be operating at an overall LOS E in 2030. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the no- build condition. Table 7 — Build Alternative 2 Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 0 2014 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at 66`h St D (E) 39 C (E) 32 D (E) 43 C (E) 33 York Ave at Southdale A (B) 5 A (B) 4 A (B) 5 A (B) 6 Entrance York Ave at Southdale D (E) 43 D (E) 47 D (E) 50 E (E) 55 Full Movement Access York Ave at 691h St D (E) 36 C (E) 33 D (E) 38 C (E) 34 69th St at Southdale A (A) 4 A (C) 4 A (A) 4 A (C) 5 Right -In / Right-Out 69` St at Southdale East A (A) 6 A (B) 7 A (A) 6 A (B) 7 Access - Roundabout 69` St at Southdale West A (A) 5 A (A) 6 A (A) 5 A (A) 6 Access - Roundabout 69`h St at France Ave D (E) 40 D (E) 35 D (E) 40 D (D) 37 Mall Circulation Rd at (691h St ) East Access A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Development Driveway Mall Circulation Rd at A (D) 16 A (C) 10 A (D) 16 B (C) 11 (York Ave) South Access C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 0 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 12 of 15 Vehicle Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2014 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the intersections in the study area. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, for the existing, and future no -build and build 2014 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, the maximum queues were exceeded. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were typically identified one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 to 4 seconds. In most cases the queues exceed the storage in left or right turn lanes adjacent to a multiple lane roadway (2 or 3 through lanes) therefore not impacting through traffic. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. Parking Impact Analysis The parking impacts to the existing Southdale Shopping Center site were analyzed based on the proposed changes in uses on the site including: the additional mall area; proposed restaurant outlot, and; proposed Southdale Residential project. Table 8 below shows a summary of each use, the exiting parking provided, parking required based on City Code and the estimated parking needs based on accepted parking generation studies. Table 8 — Site Parking Summary Use Existing Size Parking from City Code Proposed Size Parking from City Code Parking from ITE Southdale Retail 1,368,523 sf 6843 1,194,731 sf 5974 5529(1) Southdale Restaurants 2059 seats 206 1657 seats 166 NA Southdale Theater 3959 seats 396 3447 seats 345 NA Restaurant Outlot NA 0 300 seats 30 105 Apartment Development NA 0 232 units 232 318 Total Parking Spaces Required 7445 6747 5952 Total Parking Spaces Provided 6686 6442 6442 Parking Variance Required 759 305 Not Re uired (1)— Includes mall restaurants and theater area but not the future restaurant outlot (1,328,850 sf) As indicated in Table 8, the existing parking provided on the Southdale Center site is 6686 spaces with a 759 space parking variance. This variance was approved through City Council resolution (2000 -123) in December 2000. k-3 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 13 of 15 Currently with the planned mall renovation the seating in the Southdale Center restaurants and theater, the sizes are actually reduced from the approved parking resolution. With the proposed changes to the site including the future restaurant outlot and the Southdale Residential project, 6442 total parking spaces would be provided. This includes 6100 spaces on the Southdale Center site and 342 spaces associated with the Southdale Residential project:.Based on City Code the site would require 6747total spaces requiring a:variance for 305 spaces. In addition anticipated parking demand for the site was determined. The parking generation rates used to. estimate the parking demand.was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land .uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`" Edition. Table 8 shows the results of the parking demand analysis. It should be noted that the parking generation rates used for the Southdale Retail was based on a shopping center use which includes the restaurant and theater uses within the mall. The rates used for both the shopping center and restaurant outlot were for a peak weekend (Friday or Saturday) event in December,. which represents a worst case condition. Based on this analysis, only 5952 parking spaces would be needed on the Southdale Center site, which would not require a parking variance. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed. Southdale Residential project includes the addition of 232 apartment units. The:site is anticipated to generate 82 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 93 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Additional trips will be generated from vacant and renovated Southdale Center mall space and a proposed new Restaurant outlot. These uses will generate an additional 627 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 817 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways on York Avenue and 69th Street are operating at overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Two build alternatives were analyzed. Build Alternative 1 included a right - in/right -out on 69th Street and a full movement access from York Avenue to the Southdale site. Build Alternative 2 included roundabouts for the two Southdale site access locations on 69th Street. • Intersection traffic operations for both Build alternatives in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better, except the new full movement access to Southdale Center from York Avenue which would operate at an overall LOS E in 2030. Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 14 of 15 • The eastbound left turn movement from 691h Street into the mall at the Southdale East access is projected to be 320 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour in 2014. Providing an eastbound left turn lane at the 69th Street and Southdale West access would be a low cost solution to improve this potential issue. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur as a result of the proposed full build conditions in 2014 or 2030. • The existing or proposed available parking does not or will not meet the City's Code. A 759 parking space variance is currently in place for the existing Southdale Center site. With the current and proposed changes to the Southdale site, 6747 parking spaces would be required based on City Code. The current plan provides for 6442 parking spaces. This would require a variance for 305 parking spaces. • Based on ITE parking generation estimates the total parking required for the Southdale Center site is 5952 spaces. With this estimate, no parking variance would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Provide the proposed roadway improvements as shown on the proposed site plan (Build Alternative 1). 2. Construct an eastbound left turn lane at 691h Street and the Southdale West access. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Southdale Residential project or future restaurant outlot. 1t4 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 15 of 15 APPENDIX 0 m w Z wlR CI1! Ain VI fW a CH OWEN !q a a CU RVE Q X ❑� RU' W. 62 nd 2nd T S O� 3, W. w 62 nd ST. a J x a !4. a w a Ui i ST. a ? 35 r GARRI SON !q o a = a m _ 0 700 it 1400 it o 36. o w > > 35. > Cr J � m a > a a a N o v W 64 th ST. ST. 64 th ST. Q [MINNESOTA z } OK W. 64th I O W a a Li Li a a a W. 0 3 °r Cr 0� a a W. z 65 th ST. C� ssth ST. w CD O —J M U 0_ Z NI Z W ST. w a � Lake w ST. ° a m =i n z W. 66th a o0 000 � v v C Cornelia Study Area S ,� o LE a LYC- y CIf1 tMiNNESOra 68 th Project m s� 0 S7. pR TON RD BALFANZ o �Q Location > w 'Gf P�JF I I T UPPER RD. �� P' a > P W TER• a DUDS 0� • o 69th Il cOR p v~ " 4 � � L Z vP� y 0 W. 69th S a E U WA � a a � Q w � � Q Oa 000000 Pq 38. D �eERRY ° !q.° ' a x �� J ........... O C Q J �p Gy W. a a 70th o > a w ST. �° C ;C �Rk =ANDOVER RD.aMAVELL Ew� m aN a SAG � L'I yaoo w ASPgsf p ClgR�� VIDERE LA. o _ o OR. HAZELTON 40. x TRl� !q ASPASTA OR£C7RC CgRf o a o x L< N `fGM CIR. oUNy4M 0/ W. W. _ 72 nd O ST. r o S a Creed ]BISCUS o a f!lSwORTH O� DR. w CIrC! z J Us Q = 9 J AVE. �Q � O �FOAI J a y a o M O o a DELL DR. z w = 0R• PHLOX 3 x w z r � GILFORD R. 3- o° o z m LA. a . = W 4th UwJ o Lake HIBISCUS a a s 0 PARKLAWN u AVE. w ST. ST, Edina '2� 0Uq 0 o SE P ° W. 75th a 4 QOPPY SORE LA w P�� PLAZA r r W. 76th ST. Z D N U 3 = W Q � x BLVD. W. Cr Y K W Q 0 O x 77th ST. as z -� o W D� MINNESOTA VIKING w DR. N 'o �" Traffic and Parking Study Figure Southdale Residential Project City of Edina. Minnesota Project Location Map �$-a id ' 4` �p 1 l 4 bn, 1 t � s c 69TH ST BKV G R O U P Yyl 4 ]II Nevi Sao>d Sam i�� a- SSS- I�lS]I ra,a. a -min gn P2� C3.1 c 2 Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 e �? Southdale Residential Project �:. City of Edina, Minnesota Development Site Plan 6-t K.10 BE J40\Cd1Erh1bitSkS-?WO4 Traffic — P,—' \686-34 f;9-03 - S—hd,h De-b—n? PIO—Qn J"A -J L- ----------- ... it Metro Transit Site el Future Water Treatment Site I f6 swe Future Resteraunt Site 11- L ""S -069 1-9 Intersections • Analyzed With SNOY Traffic and Parking Study Figure 3 Southdale Residential Project • City of Edina, Minnesota Southdale Development Plan I��4 Aqs i11 R � • . //f ' 4! f ! t d. ♦ See Ite Plan . .� ^ of ` ` • �R ! �► '' %1 M c w _ �. yy �. ., �' - _ -* � -- __ � — l'`�• it t V 69th Street Traffic and Parking Study (� l Southdaie Residential Project 1�. City of Edina, Minnesota ME Figure 5 Build Alternate 1 a It 4r Ok I Or OW 4p. 001* N IV ► if ,& f V. O ; I, 4L 9th Street AT Wit 4r .q.-I - - - -------- m , FO Fit -it 4 1 f tit v w 'T tf 19.1 t Irv— Traffic and Parking Study Figure 6 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina, Minnesota Build Aternative 2 .q.-I Feet 9 T ..7 " ti ! h• t r++l+t , 0 250 500 1,000 f _ 4 ►a1(�; ! i. § R Is15% d { � (IM1195 J 1 t y e R pl % 11651335 1 - i•r mm ` J 1 4 r 15oIW 7�`Ii[ •. Iola J ,e } ( '' 4 •! .` �+. I W o J 1 t usln . de ;I - 1 W O — — +� .P .� IWOJ 1 1 1CAP� fl Ils9lns J 1 f _ ` • It5n 165 � _ _ I moltlst S _ tzs(m 51 Sn wloa — e t9s 11; -i s 8 �- x151zi " — ns(11W 4 Z e — Wls.n — = S twltwl i J l r tsontW J 1 \ r 3sl lo) J l r n19s1 J l t r of a J l l e ®Inn E J 1 In1w J t Ilz9l ns r Ivi J t r i t IWO J t( (22.1 J ti t r " IslnsiS —9 A S 13w1 ws —. _ R I.9al.as I Itnl il0 � B $ Itssl tsa � _ rf 1 zsl zs 1 — — — I5 %w t I % p 11151150 1 — 9 — I J� l I �� • ,� 1� 0 N Traffic and Parking Study Southdale Residential Project City of Edina Figure 7 PM (SAT) 2014 NO BUILD Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Feet s 0 250 500 1,000 g a l a 9s13o1 R 9 .- 9w13301 A J j l r 219 amt 110s11ss + S 1 r — J j 4 r 35( 40) J j r •:. L 190lzaol �c. �i. l al o 1 } r (0) o j (25)35,..�n — 'j()1 e' 5001 e It t r ! a ssl5% � • .�� l of a � � S e es a — r:ri (0o '1 t e t r 25135 -. _ { + '1 ? /• _ :r ii1111 H_ �.M. .' F a N a usltsW r M l 25135 1 S `� C► s ^ ry 5( 2D) 135(199) J' n5sl ns � 1 1 r a a - r 195(1901 J + 4 r 15011 w1 X1951190 •� $ 8 ,1155)190 7 — — , p ^ iI51t05) J j 16 r 9slw Ivs)sis -. x — a g 1 35) is — , "1 Traffic and Parking Study Southdale Residential Project ' City of Edina 9r Izs(tzol LL 51 s1 $ R a 31513901 0515�51 ^ gJ j l (3301215 4 '1 t e t e (Uq 1. 1 t r M909 1961 nz _ yr. 11¢61 lso s L Figure 8 PM (SAT) 2014 BUILD ALT 1 Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes MMM06eet� 0 250 500 1,000 A J 1 4 r n0P1W noshes + q 1 r 01 0) (110) IW g ^° 1I511n1 0 p 9 0101 I1u111s 1 - ,, J 1 4 t r I is) 15 r g 1Is) ,51 s r g {e1e I r � o of w J 1 4 r �' o(0 MA -.f " %o+ 1 t r •R'��, i < 551 sq I U) 0 9f � - v e e r 10) 0 N 'J �• J 1 l r ml1% (25) Is + �" 1 ✓ 1 it ,ls lisW �A I � S �- 151101 . t � . •1 119) m mpm I{ - < nOs% _ 3 ,n(I ssl 40(70) 0 3 3 1111170) 211:x l 51 N 3 1is 11e01 - e 4 - sm lsesl - a R lt0 hsol ~ N l r asq J 1 4 r ulss) J 1 r Ot 0) ~ E J{ L r ,sole% J l J l 4 r �s(s% 110)n ++ t r owl. + t r hsshw. + ti t r ( 010 (2 IN + q t r F I,ssrJn r $ $ utq�,e -. a _ 11ih u1 -. _ s 14M Mi — s s lul n, n 5 B 115115 1 1 s0) q 0 1 f? e q S{ Traffic and Parking Study Figure 9 Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2014 BUILD ALT 2 _ City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Alo y ,;'! a .e . _ i •t. >_ a-:'.c,• - —`"�•' _ 9 i. Feet D 250 SOU 1,000�x�,/♦ �►>jl'► .r.al,l.t ! a ,^�. - {cftvwp�I•w!i�� T! "i�l S R a 91511551 h - -w f J i t r IBBINM y � - - '• � B - of % IJSnlas � 6 �i pp� `v 8Z `� w + e e e •- lss (t151 ♦ l of o , - R r � 5• - ili �, J � t '• � •rte e � a tsollssl lsnss , - 0 b a W(140) a too llssl a Isl eM a .sl ]51 n § a iol iM a A f 215(lu) a e 3sl21s) e e Jos (m) a e e .- ass lsi°1 g ,IDltss) J 1 t r +s9 U9M J 1 L uleM J 1 t r Js19s1 J 1 L °1 m 1 1 4 r 451651 t r IMO I, t r IJmlmS I, 1 r /% o , t r I185)71° -. 0 8 15651515 53 (18M IOJ 6 & 14851495 ti _ _ (951165 9 7 35 1 � r Traffic and Parking Study Figure 10 ca x Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2030 NO BUILD City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes �q1 t Feet 0 250 500 1,000 a ORSt,;� 10130' � e e t `�. Uu1ns S t r sI8 of o) Itsq tm 1 — — � J t L r 24012a1 ' Iqo s � t r St 1 q o t r {I 1 q o 1 t r Iola G 4 i -(um T. (131 is t e •i nesns — i R t]s 11 ]sl R .- ms(rosf 9 e o �" sso111q e e r -(5sq ry .°3 ,_ "w's) J 1 nolnol J t r al,q J 1 l r osl ssl J 1 •' olq J t 4 r ssl ssl E 1 .q .0 r t i r IngnO a ti t r 3 I,ss „OS + x (M)Vs Ic Iqo Inzl,s — Traffic and Parking Study ae Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) - City of Edina �Ict Figure 11 2030 BUILD ALT 1 Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Feet 0 250 500 1,000 +(141 ^. to c Z E." q _ vs13m 3 A 'jnil} - t1E ,ry11 r S r .. J y L mum Pi _ 6 $ c sl 5) _ _ of n � •�� 1]smeis � �_ m R ' F '� _ • e g of 01 It1012�5 + 3511m ~ Imo J 1 t r J y L r iso lztm o1 0 a 1 t 1 z) 35 •» , ' .{ ,j*: I'Io I's) 15 + •d of of R e Imo 's t r j 1 sslsm Imo+ - J y L r M(n) .4 `A 4 Imo 1 t 1' • t I xsl ]s -• 3 - �' z �',) l(w"u r a a t 135(15m srt -'� � �, - -s..- t "t r.• ♦ .i a:5)' �_ 5q• r J y L r tssPa R " 3rs»r+ t slw� t ;i (165)175. -1 t r Ixm x6 -. x ce f s 5 r Ae(t /m � � ,eUl,ls) — — — L �t:.l,..�. sl s] y� 6 � t 1a1 10 a o ... 23112'5) S r •- xsiln5) st r .- ]is13w; (fs o e .1(6x01 J l L tA("ol J y l 'sled J y L r 'slvu J y L of m J 1 L � tst sm E 1.460 1 1 (165),ro 1 t f36sl,oa 1 1 t Imo 5 t P Inm,66 > > t F 1'151 xw + le,m- + 9' 13161353 1/151111 F -u 1(('(x06 + L (351 is + 156160 R r µ" Figure 12 I• Traffic and Parking Study g Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2030 BUILD ALT 2 __ City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes York Ave & 66th St 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN (',rnnnc Printarl_ I Inchiftarl File Name : York Ave & 66th St Site Code : 00000011 Start Date : 7/12/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 40 York Ave From North 19 0 66th St From East 25 127 York Ave From South 03:15 PM 46 66th St From West 18 0 Start Time Riclht I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T,wi Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.Tw 109 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.Towi Right I Thru I Left Peds I A .TO.i Int.Tolal 02:30 P M 02:45 PM 44 43 135 19 0 119 18 0 198 180 10 14 84 72 0 127 89 0 166 230 53 37 124 59 0 155 61 0 236 253 54 50 58 36 0 81 34 0 148. 165 748 828 Total 87 254 37 0 378 24 211 161 0 396 90 279 120 0 489 104 139 70 0 313 1576 03:00 PM 40 109 19 0 168 25 127 91 03:15 PM 46 84 18 0 148 19 159 69 03:30 PM 29 109 19 0 157 14 160 79 03:45 PM 33 114 17 0 164 19 164 110 Total 148 416 73 0 637 77 610 349 04:00 PM 30 110 22 0 162 15 150 92 04:15 PM 28 112 18 0 158 16 149 91 04:30 PM 24 123 17 0 164 30 176 81 04:45 PM 28 97 19 0 144 18 226 106 Total 110. 442 76 0 628 79 701 370 05:00 PM 39 95 19 3 156 18 197 84 05:15 PM 26 127 23 0 176 16 224 103 05:30 PM 28 117 15 0 160 35 180 80 05:45 PM 15 115 20 0 150 28 172 108 Total 108 454 77 3 642 97 773 375 06:00 PM 26 137 10 0 173 9 123 97 06:15 PM 35 103 11 0 149 14 109 79 Grand Total 514 1806 284 3 2607 300 2527 1431 Apprch % 19.7 69.3 10.9 0.1 7 59.3 33.6 Total % 3.4 11.9 1.9 0 17.2 2 16.7 9.5 0 243 63 130 60 0 247 1 63 130 69 0 253 63 158 65 0 293 79 133 72 0 1036 268 551 266 0 257 69 159 48 0 256 101 138 68 0 287 60 165 66 0 350 78 176 69 0 11501 308 638 251 0 299 84 185 60 0 343 82 180 63 0 295 69 186 59 0 308 86 154 62 0 1245 321 705 244 0 229 81 183 66 0 202 76 164 53 0 4258 1144 2520 1000 0 24.5 54 21.4 0 28.1 7.6 16.6 6.6 kl� 0 253 53 92 28 0 262 47 115 34 0 286 56 153 42 0 284 47 132 41 0 10851 203 492 145 0 276 66 123 36 0 307 61 153 50 0 291 61 157 29 0 323 61 202 52 0 11971 249 635 167 0 329 59 183 57 0 .325 47 169 54 0 314 46 126 44 0 302 55 149 45 0 330 41 115 39 0 293 39 104 32 0 4664 843 2112 653 0 23.4 58.5 18.1 0 30.8 5.6 14 4.3 0 173 837 0 196 853 0 251 947 0 220 961 0 840 3598 0 225 920 0 264 985 0 247 989 0 315 1132 0 1051 4026 0 299 1083 0 270 1114 0 216 985 0 249 1009 0 1034 4191 0 195 927 0 175 819 0 3608 15137 0 0 23.8 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 66th St - York Ave . Out In Total I 9801 Elp F1620 1171 4 8 3 File Name : York Ave & 66th St 2:30 -6:30 pm Peak Hour Data Site Code : 00000011 Edina, MN T North Start Date : 7/12/2012 ro � 90's F m - Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P Page No : 2 R y York Ave 3 O 66th St a York Ave 66th St. From North From East From South From West Start Time I Ri ht Thru Left Peds I A .Total I Ri hi I Thru I Left I Peds I A .T6tel I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A- .Tome I Right I Thru I Left Peds I App.T.tal I Int.Tatal Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 24 123 17 0 164 30 176 81 0 287 60 165 66 0 291 61 157 29 0 247 989 04:45 PM 28 97 19 0' 144 18 226 106 0 350 78 176 69 0 323 61 .202 52 0 315 1132 05:00 PM 39 95' . 19 3 156 18 197 84 0 299 84 185 60 0 329 59 183 57 0 299 1083 05:15 PM 26 127 23 0 176 16 224 103 0 343 82 .180 63 0 325 47 169 54 0 270 1114 Total Volume 117 442 78 3 640 ..82 823 374 0 1279 304 706 258 0 1268 228 711 192 0 1131 4318 % App. Total 18.3 69.1 12.2 0.5 6.4 64.3 29.2 0 24 55.7 20.3 0 20.2 62.9 17 0 PHF .750 .870 .848 .250 .909 1 .683 .910 .882 .000 .914 .905 .954 .935 .000 .964 .934 .880 .842 .000 .898 .954 +i T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 2581 7061 3041 0 0 Out In Total Ynk :1 ^ N H.0 -� 2 m ro rn w � r m � m O - York Ave . Out In Total I 9801 Elp F1620 1171 4 8 3 Right Thru Left Peds. Peak Hour Data N .s J T North L� ro � F m - Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P R y Unshifted 3 O N a +i T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 2581 7061 3041 0 0 Out In Total Ynk :1 ^ N H.0 -� 2 m ro rn w � r m � m O York Ave & 66th St 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 1--.— PAM-1- I 1— hiff—A File Name : York Ave & 66th St -sat Site Code : 00000011 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 11:00 AM 24 121 12 11:15 AM 23 138 17 11:30 AM 12 150 12 11:45 AM 16 182 13 Total 75 591 54 12:00 PM 26 130 13 12:15 PM 15 142 15 12:30 PM 15 150 6 12:45 PM 11 149 13 Total 67 571 47 01:00 PM 24 143 9 01:15 PM 15 147 10 01:30 PM 25 140 14 01:45 PM 18 135 14 Total 82 565 47 02:00 PM 15 138 16 02:15 PM 20 137 22 Grand Total 295 2299 221 Apprch % 10.5 81.7 7.9 Total % 2.6 20 1.9 0 157 1 71 58 0 178 13 66 73 0 174 3 58 79 0 211 0 71 84 0 720 17 266 294 0 169 0 82 76 0 172 7 76 75 0 171 6 69 88 0 173 12 71 84 0 685 25 298 323 0 176 3 71 70 York Ave From North 6 78 66th St From East 0 179 4 York Ave From South 96 0 167 66th St From West 70 62 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Ap,.T.., Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tome Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP. Tow Ri ht I Thru I Leff I Peds I App. TOmt Int. Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 16 20 122 23 0 175 12 0 161 207 7 0 43 73 0 53 79 0 123 132 63 56 85 15 0 113 49 0 163 218 7 23 36 14 0 58 19 0 57 100 504 657 Total 36 297 35 0 368 7 96 152 0 255 119 198 64 0 381 30 94 33 0 157 1161 11:00 AM 24 121 12 11:15 AM 23 138 17 11:30 AM 12 150 12 11:45 AM 16 182 13 Total 75 591 54 12:00 PM 26 130 13 12:15 PM 15 142 15 12:30 PM 15 150 6 12:45 PM 11 149 13 Total 67 571 47 01:00 PM 24 143 9 01:15 PM 15 147 10 01:30 PM 25 140 14 01:45 PM 18 135 14 Total 82 565 47 02:00 PM 15 138 16 02:15 PM 20 137 22 Grand Total 295 2299 221 Apprch % 10.5 81.7 7.9 Total % 2.6 20 1.9 0 157 1 71 58 0 178 13 66 73 0 174 3 58 79 0 211 0 71 84 0 720 17 266 294 0 169 0 82 76 0 172 7 76 75 0 171 6 69 88 0 173 12 71 84 0 685 25 298 323 0 176 3 71 70 0 172 6 78 77 0 179 4 66 96 0 167 2 70 62 0 694 15 285 305 0 169 9 77 70 0 179 15 75 92 0 2815 88 1097 1236 0 3.6 45.3 51 0 24.5 0.8 9.5 10.8 0 130 74 130 44 0 152 66 136 43 1 141 67 125 46 0 155 81 168 50 1 5781 288 559 183 0 158 94 145 59 0 158 76 167 40 0 163 87 145 58 0 167 78 153 59 0 6461 335 610 216 0 144 94 148 58 1 162 79 148 47 0 166 65 170 56 0 134 72 129 60 1 606 310 595 221 0 156 83 136 49 0 182 55 156 55 2 2423 1190 2254 788 0.1 28.1 53.2 18.6 0 21.1 10.4 19.6 6.9 kq 6 0 248 30 45 17 0 245 36 55 26 0 238 39 63 24 0 299 37 77 18 0 1030 142 240 85 0 298 40 77 18 0 283 46 65 28 0 290 49 66 26 0 290 39 70 37 0 1161 174 278 109 0 300 42 58 31 0 274 39 87 16 1 292 54 65 18 0 261 42 73 25 1 1127 177 283 90 0 268 26 79 39 0 266 39 69 36 1 4233 588 1043 392 0 29.1 51.6 19.4 0 36.8 5.1 9.1 3.4 0 92 627 0 117 692 0 126 679 0 132 797 0 467 2795 0 135 760 0 139 752 0 141 765 0 146 776 0 561 3053 0 131 751 0 142 750 0 137 774 0 140 702 0 550 2977 0 144 737 0 144 771 0 2023 11494 0 0 17.6 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 66th St 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy File Name : York Ave & 66th St -sat Site Code : 00000011 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 York Ave From North 66th St From East York Ave From South 66th St From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.W Right I Thru I Left I Peds I a .T,di Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Apo. Teel Right I Thru I Left Peds Term Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Out In Total 45 5 72 604 4 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM ) .. w o North 4-2 O1 c Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A ,�, w 11:45 AM 16 182 13 0 211 0 71 84 0 155 81 168 50 0 299 37 77 18 0 132 797 12:00 PM 26 130 13 0 169 0 82 76 0 158 94 145 59 0 298 40 77 18 0 135 760 12:15 PM 15 142 15 0 172 7 76 75 0 158 76 167 40 0 283 46 65 28 0 139 752 12:30 PM 15 150 6 0 171 6 69 88 0 163 87 145 58 0 290 49 66 26 0 141 765 Total Volume 72 604 47 0 723 13 298 323 0 634 338 625 207 0 1170 172 285 90 0 547 3074 %App. Total 10 83.5 6.5 0 2.1 47 50.9 0 28.9 53.4 17.7 0 31.4 52.1 16.5 0 �q-7 York Ave Out In Total 45 5 72 604 4 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 6 ) .. w o North 4-2 O1 c Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A ,�, w tom o r. Unshifted r `x N w v In O o CD I I Left Thru Ri ht Peds 207 625 3381 0 Out In Total �q-7 York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 Site Code : 00000008 Start Date : 7/11/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 0 York Ave From North 27 0 Entrance From East -41 0 York Ave From South 0 71 Southdale Ent From West 223 0 Start Time Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I APP. Toni Right I Thru I Left Peds A .T.., Right I Thru I Left Peds A .Ton, Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP.T.W 0 Int.Total 02:30 P M 02:45 P M 0 0 93 28 1 177 37 0 122 214 39 21 0 32 0 0 35 0 71 56 10 6 233 0 0 221 0 0 243 227 15 31 0 27 0 10 20 0 42 61 478 558 Total 0 270 65 1 336 60 0 67 0 127 16 454 0 0 470 46 10 47 0 103 1036 03:00 PM 0 156 27 0 183 -41 0 30 0 71 5 223 0 0 228 23 8 20 0 51 533 03:15 PM 0 185 39 0 224 40 0 23 0 63 16 213 0 0 229 28 6 25 0 59 575 03:30 PM 0 163 26 0 189 42 0 37 0 79 15 210 0 0 225 16 11 27 4 58 551 03:45 PM 0 179 41 0 220 32 0 32 0 64 16 238 0 0 254 18 3 25 0 46 584 Total 0 683 133 0 816 155 0 122 0 277 52 884 0 0 936 85 28 97 4 214 2243 04:00 PM 0 138 37 0 175 36 0 25 0 61 15 229 0 0 244 32 7 37 0 76 556 04:15 PM 0 175 38 0 213 33 0 34 0 67 14 246 0 0 260 18 4 27 0 49 589 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0 299 17 2 29 2 50 635 Total 0 670 149 0 819 131 0 131 0 262 55 1000 0 0 1055 82 18 116 3 219 1 2355 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40 0 36 0 76 12 -234 0 0 246 15 5 26 3 49 568 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 0 27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 05:30 P M 0 161 41 0 202 43 0 29 0 72 17 201 0 0 218 30 5 28 2 65 557 05:45 PM 0 182 49 0 231 47 0 44 0 91 15 260 0 0 275 10 7 17 2 36 633 Total 0 662 162 0 824 174 0 136 0 310 59 986 0 0 1045 84 22 105 7 2181 2397 06:00 PM 0 140 20 0 160 44 0 33 0 77 15 214 0 0 229 21 4 34 1 60 526 06:15 PM 0 167 33 0 200 31 0 32 0 63 8 213 0 0 221 16 4 15 0 35 519 Grand Total 0 2592 562 1 3155 595 0 521 0 1116 205 3751 0 0 3956 334 86 414 15 849 9076 Apprch % 0 82.2 17.8 0 53.3 0 46.7 0 5.2 94.8 0 0 39.3 10.1 48.8 1.8 Total % 0 28.6 6.2 0 34.8 6.6 0 5.7 0 12.3 2.3 41.3 0 0 43.6 3.7 0.9 4.6 0.2 9.4 W York Ave Ou I Total 308 8 2130 0 676 146 0 Right T� Left 0 82.2 17.8 0 52 0 48 0 4.8 95.2 0 0 36 6.1 53.1 2.8 PHF .000 .914. '.936 .000. .830 .000 .865 .000 .924 .779 .902 .000 .000 .901 .655 .850 .824 '.500 .776 .946 Peds Peak Hour Data _j T -- m � North � R ~2 � v — Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � y U shif e .�x N C ' a Left Thru i ht Peds 0 1050 53 0 ® 03 990 Out In Total 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 _207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0_ 299 17 2 29 2 50" .635 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40- 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 -246 15 5 26 3 49 568. 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 10 .27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 Total Volume 0 676 146 0 822 146 0 135 0 281 53 1050 0 0 1103 76 17 112 6 211 2417 %.App. Total h-9� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 file Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code :00000008 Edina, MN Start Date :7/11/2012 90's Page No :2 Southdale. Ent .York Ave Entrance York Ave.. From North From East From South - From West - Start Time Right Thru . Left .Peds Right Thru Left -Peds App, r6mi Right Thty Left Peds T °m� Right Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of i Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04.30 PM York Ave Ou I Total 308 8 2130 0 676 146 0 Right T� Left 0 82.2 17.8 0 52 0 48 0 4.8 95.2 0 0 36 6.1 53.1 2.8 PHF .000 .914. '.936 .000. .830 .000 .865 .000 .924 .779 .902 .000 .000 .901 .655 .850 .824 '.500 .776 .946 Peds Peak Hour Data _j T -- m � North � R ~2 � v — Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � y U shif e .�x N C ' a Left Thru i ht Peds 0 1050 53 0 ® 03 990 Out In Total 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 _207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0_ 299 17 2 29 2 50" .635 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40- 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 -246 15 5 26 3 49 568. 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 10 .27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 Total Volume 0 676 146 0 822 146 0 135 0 281 53 1050 0 0 1103 76 17 112 6 211 2417 %.App. Total h-9� Thru Left Peds a . r °m� 0 82.2 17.8 0 52 0 48 0 4.8 95.2 0 0 36 6.1 53.1 2.8 PHF .000 .914. '.936 .000. .830 .000 .865 .000 .924 .779 .902 .000 .000 .901 .655 .850 .824 '.500 .776 .946 Peds Peak Hour Data _j T -- m � North � R ~2 � v — Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � y U shif e .�x N C ' a Left Thru i ht Peds 0 1050 53 0 ® 03 990 Out In Total 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 _207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0_ 299 17 2 29 2 50" .635 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40- 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 -246 15 5 26 3 49 568. 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 10 .27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 Total Volume 0 676 146 0 822 146 0 135 0 281 53 1050 0 0 1103 76 17 112 6 211 2417 %.App. Total h-9� Peds Peak Hour Data _j T -- m � North � R ~2 � v — Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � y U shif e .�x N C ' a Left Thru i ht Peds 0 1050 53 0 ® 03 990 Out In Total 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 _207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0_ 299 17 2 29 2 50" .635 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40- 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 -246 15 5 26 3 49 568. 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 10 .27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 Total Volume 0 676 146 0 822 146 0 135 0 281 53 1050 0 0 1103 76 17 112 6 211 2417 %.App. Total h-9� Left Thru i ht Peds 0 1050 53 0 ® 03 990 Out In Total 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 _207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0_ 299 17 2 29 2 50" .635 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40- 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 -246 15 5 26 3 49 568. 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 10 .27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 Total Volume 0 676 146 0 822 146 0 135 0 281 53 1050 0 0 1103 76 17 112 6 211 2417 %.App. Total h-9� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Default Comments File Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 -sat Change These in The Preferences Window Site Code : 00000008 Select File /Preference in the Main Scree Start Date : 7/21/2012 Then Click the Comments Tab Page No : 1 r'rnnns Printarl_ I InszhlftArl 11:00 AM 0 From North 32 0 From East 33 0 From South 0 66 From West 182 0 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.Totai Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.ui Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App,T.w Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP.Toul Int.rotal 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 0 0 160 28 0 184 49 0 188 233 29 25 0 21 0 0 17 0 50 42 9 11 148 0 0 179 0 0 157 190 12 17 4 6 1 7 27 0 23 51 418 516 Total 0 344 77 0 421 54 0 38 0 92 20 327 0 0 347 29 11 33 1 74 934 11:00 AM 0 161 32 0 193 33 0 33 0 66 13 182 0 0 195 12 1 5 0 18 472 11:15 AM 11 96 34 0 141 36 68 6 0 110 10 131 2 0 143 24 5 10 0 39 433 11:30 AM 1 158 39 0 198 37 0 23 0 60 18 165 0 0 183 19 5 20 0 44 485 11:45 AM 0 213 37 0 250 49 0 30 0 79 16 222 0 0 238 40 2 17 0 59 626 Total 12 628 142 0 782 155 68 92 0 315 57 700 2 0 759 95 13 52 0 1601 2016 12:00 PM 0 144 33 0 177 46 0 40 0 86 3 219 0 0 222 28 5 27 0 60 545 12:15 PM 0 166 41 0 207 37 0 37 0 74 11 223 1 0 235 31 1 19 0 51 567 12:30 PM 0 160 38 0 198 46 0 33 0 79 9 211 0 0 220 17 6 22 0 45 542 12:45 PM 0 172 30 0 202 33 0 30 0 63 17 227 0 0 244 20 4 22 0 46 555 Total 0 642 142 0 784 162 0 140 0 302 40 880 1 0 921 96 16 90 0 2021 2209 01:00 PM 3 132 44 0 179 41 41 32 0 114 12 175 0 0 187 33 3 24 0 60 540 01:15 PM 0 178 29 0 207 38 0 40 0 78 15 226 1 0 242 26 3 26 0 55 582 01:30 PM 0 150 50 0 200 29 0 35 0 64 12 208 0 0 220 24 9 27 0 60 544 01:45 PM 0 145 50 0 195 36 2 34 1 73 14 211 0 0 225 25 3 34 0 62 555 Total 3 605 173 0 781 144 43 141 1 329 53 820 1 0 874 108 18 111 0 2371 2221 02:00 PM 5 161 52 0 218 35 0 31 0 66 15 195 0 0 210 33 3 25 0 61 555 02:15 PM 0 180 41 0 221 58 0 37 0 95 13 215 0 0 228 25 5 18 0 48 592 Grand Total 20 2560 627 0 3207 608 111 479 1 1199 198 3137 4 0 3339 386 66 329 1 782 8527 Apprch % 0.6 79.8 19.6 0 50.7 9.3 39.9 0.1 5.9 94 0.1 0 49.4 8.4 42.1 0.1 Total % 0.2 30 7.4 0 37.6 7.1 1.3 5.6 0 14.1 2.3 36.8 0 0 39.2 4.5 0.8 3.9 0 9.2 PDG WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Default Comments File Name York Ave.& Southdale Ent-site Change These in The Preferences Window Site Code : 00000008 Select File /Preference in the Main Scree Start Date : 7/21/2012 Then Click the Comments Tab Page No 2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 From North ' From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds n :r °m� Right Thal Left Peds App. rmi Right Thru Left Peds r °ml Out In Total ® 832 1970 0 683 149 0 Right Thru Left 0 82.1 17.9 0 56 0 44 '- 0 4.3 95.6 0.1 0 54 6.5 39.5 0 PHF :000 .802 .909 .000 .832 .908 -.000 .875. .000 .924 .609 .981 .250 .000 ..961 .725 .583 .787 .000 .896 .911 Peds. Peak Hour Data CO North c a Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A W � r r m E�; Unshifted 'o Left Ri ht Peds 8751 39 0 939 5 ®5 Out In Total 91:45 AM 0 213 37 0 250 49 0 30 0 79 16 222 0 0 238 40 2 17 0 59 626 12:00 PM 0 144- 33 0 .177 46 0 40 0 86 .. 3 219 0 0 222 28 5 27 0 60 ' 545 12:15 PM, 0 166 41 0 -207 37 0 37 0 74 11 223. 1 0 235 31 1 19 0 51 567 12:30 PM 0 .160 38 0 198 .46 0 33 0 79 9 211 0 ' 0 220 17 6 22 0 45 542' Total Volume 0 683 149 0 832 178 0 140 0 318 39 875 1 0 915 116 14 85 0 215 2280 App. Total Ri ht T Thru Left Peds r roes 0 82.1 17.9 0 56 0 44 '- 0 4.3 95.6 0.1 0 54 6.5 39.5 0 PHF :000 .802 .909 .000 .832 .908 -.000 .875. .000 .924 .609 .981 .250 .000 ..961 .725 .583 .787 .000 .896 .911 Peds. Peak Hour Data CO North c a Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A W � r r m E�; Unshifted 'o Left Ri ht Peds 8751 39 0 939 5 ®5 Out In Total 91:45 AM 0 213 37 0 250 49 0 30 0 79 16 222 0 0 238 40 2 17 0 59 626 12:00 PM 0 144- 33 0 .177 46 0 40 0 86 .. 3 219 0 0 222 28 5 27 0 60 ' 545 12:15 PM, 0 166 41 0 -207 37 0 37 0 74 11 223. 1 0 235 31 1 19 0 51 567 12:30 PM 0 .160 38 0 198 .46 0 33 0 79 9 211 0 ' 0 220 17 6 22 0 45 542' Total Volume 0 683 149 0 832 178 0 140 0 318 39 875 1 0 915 116 14 85 0 215 2280 App. Total Peds. Peak Hour Data CO North c a Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A W � r r m E�; Unshifted 'o Left Ri ht Peds 8751 39 0 939 5 ®5 Out In Total 91:45 AM 0 213 37 0 250 49 0 30 0 79 16 222 0 0 238 40 2 17 0 59 626 12:00 PM 0 144- 33 0 .177 46 0 40 0 86 .. 3 219 0 0 222 28 5 27 0 60 ' 545 12:15 PM, 0 166 41 0 -207 37 0 37 0 74 11 223. 1 0 235 31 1 19 0 51 567 12:30 PM 0 .160 38 0 198 .46 0 33 0 79 9 211 0 ' 0 220 17 6 22 0 45 542' Total Volume 0 683 149 0 832 178 0 140 0 318 39 875 1 0 915 116 14 85 0 215 2280 App. Total York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 2:30 -6:30 Edina MN 90's _ WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN C4rhiinc Printarl_ I Inahiffari File Name : York Ave & southdale ent -site 9 Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 7/12/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 35 York Ave From North 0 1 Entrance From East 0 0 York Ave From South 1 1 Southdale Ent From West 232 15 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds A .ToW Right Thru Left Peds A .Tama Ri ht Thru Left Peds Tom, Ri ht Thru Left Peds Tome Int.Tolal 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 29 33 212 0 1 217 0 1 242 251 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 250 11 0 225 9 0 261 234 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 505 485 Total 62 429 0 2 493 1 0 0 1 2 0 475 20 0 495 0 0 0 0 0 990 03:00 PM 35 203 0 1 239 0 0 0 1 1 5 232 15 1 253 0 0 0 1 1 494 03:15 PM 19 173 0 5 197 1 0 0 1 2 1 264 11 0 276 0 0 0 1 1 476 03:30 PM 32 198 0 0 230 1 0 0 4 5 0 281 12 0 293 0 0 0 3 3 531 03:45 PM 27 238 0 0 265 0 0 0 4 4 0 280 15 0 295 0 0 0 0 0 564 Total 113 812 0 6 931 2 0 0 10 12 6 1057 53 1 1117 0 0 0 5 5 2065 04:00 PM 35 217 0 2 254 1 0 0 6 7 0 286 14 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 561- 04:15 PM 37 207 0 1 245 3 0 0 4 7 1 309 18 0 328 0 0 0 2 2 582 04:30 PM 24 224 0 1 249 1 0 0 6 7 1 297 9 1 308 0 0 0 0 0 564 04:45 PM 39 210 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 317 16 1 335 0 0 0 0 0 589 Total 135 858 0 6 999 6 0 0 18 24 3 1209 57 2 1271 0 0 0 2 2 2296 05:00 PM 31 208 0 1 240 1 0 0 1 2 0 326 21 2 349 0 0 0 0 0 591 05:15 PM 28 223 0 1 252 1 0 0 3 4 0 307 19 1 327 0 0 0 0 0 583 05:30 PM 27 199 0 0 226 2 0 0 7 9 1 312 17 3 333 0 0 0 1 1 569 05:45 PM 30 221 0 1 252 1 0 0 9 10 0 293 14 1 308 0 0 0 1 1 571 Total 116 851 0 3 970 5 0 0 20 25 1 1238 71 7 1317 0 0 0 2 2 1 2314 06:00 PM 32 215 0 0 247 1 0 0 2 3 0 305 6 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 561 06:15 PM 28 174 0 0 202 0 0 0 3 3 0 259 20 1 280 0 0 0 2 2 487 Grand Total 486 3339 0 17 3842 15 0 0 54 69 10 4543 227 11 4791 0 0 0 11 11 8713 Apprch % 12.6 86.9 0 0.4 21.7 0 0 78.3 0.2 94.8 4.7 0.2 - 0 0 0 100 Total % 5.6 38.3 0 0.2 44.1 0.2 0 0 0.6 0.8 0.1 52.1 2.6 0.1 55 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 ,1001 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 File Name : York Ave & southdale ent -site 9 2:30 -6:30 roes Site Code : 00000009 Edina MN Start Date ` 7/12/2012 90's Page No : 2 York Ave Entrance York Ave Southgate Ent From North. From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds T °m, Right Thru Left Peds T. m� Right Thru Left Peds r °w Ri ht Thru Left Peds App, Inl. Total Peak Hour Analysis. From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 39 210 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 317 16 1 335 0 0 0 0 0 589 05:00 PM 31 208 0 1 240 1 0 0 1 2 0 326 21 2 349 0 0 0 0 0 591 05:15 PM. 28 223 .0 1 252 1 0 0 3 4 0 307 19 1. .327 0 0 .0 0 . 0 583 05:30.PM 27 .199 0 '0 226 . 2 0 0 7 9 1 .312 17 3 333 0 0 0 1 1 569 Total Volume 125, 840 0 4 969 5 0 0 13 18 2 .1262 73 7 1344 0 0 0 1. 1 2332 App. Total 12.9 86.7 0 0.4 27.8 - 0 0 72.2 0.1 93.9 5.4 0.5 0 0 0 100 PHF .801 .942 .000 .500 .961 .625 .000 .000 .464 .500 .500 .968 .869 .583 .963 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .986 York Ave Out In Total 267 F-9-691 1 36 125 840 0 4 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data J � North W N f- a — Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P L L a � + Unsh' ed � y O v d Left Thru i ht Peds 3 262 2 7 ® 3 Out In Total �- -? m C O _ �m rN W y x 0 � O o.� om y G, roes 36 125 840 0 4 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data J � North W N f- a — Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P L L a � + Unsh' ed � y O v d Left Thru i ht Peds 3 262 2 7 ® 3 Out In Total �- -? m C O _ �m rN W y x 0 � O o.� om y G, York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 10:30 -2:30 Edina MN pt cloudy York Ave WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Entrance File Name : York Ave & southdale ent -site 9 -sat Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 York Ave Southdale Ent 10:30 AM 32 171 0 1 204 1 0 0 1 2 0 171 12 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 389 10:45 AM 41 236 0 1 278 0 0 0 0 0 2 213 18 0 233 0 0 0 0 0 511 Total 73 407 0 2 4821 1 0 0 1 21 2 384 30 0 4161 0 0 0 0 01 900 11:00 AM 39 172 0 1 212 1 0 0 1 2 4 197 23 1 225 0 0 0 0 0 439 11:15 AM 42 205 0 3 250 1 0 0 1 2 1 151 26 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 430 11:30 AM 39 229 0 0 268 1 0 0 2 3 0 194 28 1 223 0 0 0 1 1 495 11:45 AM 36 268 0 0 304 0 0 0 2 2 1 256 32 1 290 0 0 0 0 0 596 Total 156 874 0 4 1034 3 0 0 6 9 6 798 109 3 916 0 0 0 1 1 1 1960 12:00 PM 41 208 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 251 41 1 294 0 0 0 0 0 548 12:15 PM 35 225 0 2 262 2 0 0 1 3 2 256 23 0 281 0 0 0 2 2 548 12:30 PM 29 259 0 0 288 1 0 0 2 3 1 256 23 1 281 0 0 0 0 0 572 12:45 PM 46 232 0 2 280 4 0 0 2 6 1 258 24 1 284 0 0 0 0 0 570 Total 151 924 0 6 1081 8 0 0 7 15 5 1021 111 3 1140 0 0 0 2 21 2238 01:00 PM 42 215 0 1 258 1 0 0 1 2 2 222 18 2 244 0 0 0 2 2 506 01:15 PM 35 236 0 1 272 1 0 0 2 3 0 261 29 1 291 0 0 0 0 0 566 01:30 PM 32 250 0 2 284 2 0 0 4 6 1 229 35 2 267 0 0 0 1 1 558 01:45 PM 39 203 0 0 242 1 0 0 2 3 2 239 42 1 284 0 0 0 1 1 530 Total 148 904 0 4 1056 5 0 0 9 14 5 951 124 6 1086 0 0 0 4 41 2160 02:00 PM 31 200 0 0 231 1 0 0 1 2 1 224 31 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 489 02:15 PM 42 226 0 0 268 0 0 0 2 2 0 262 29 1 292 0 0 0 1 1 563 Grand Total 601 3535 0 16 4152 18 0 0 26 44 19 3640 434 13 4106 0 0 0 8 8 8310 Apprch % 14.5 85.1 0 0.4 40.9 0 0 59.1 0.5 88.7 10.6 0.3 0 0 0 100 Total % 7.2 42.5 0 0.2 50 0.2 0 0 0.3 0.5 0.2 43.8 5.2 0.2 49.4 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 W`.1- WSB &Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave.& Southdale Ent -site 9 4=� J � 1 L� p no Z d File Name :York Ave & southdale ent -site 9 -sat 10:30 -2:30 t a r Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A o' CD o Site Code :00000009 r r - m o Edina MN - a y m Start Date : 7/21/2012 +, T F+ t cloudy Y Left Thru Ri ht Peds _ 1191 10191 51 3 Page No :2 ®0 1 6 York Ave Entrance. York Ave Southdale Ent From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds q :Toml Right Thru Left Peds T..1 Right Thru' Left Peds q ,ToGI Right Thru Left . Peds roml Int. Tolal Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 36 268 0 0 304 0 0 0 2 2 1 256 32 1 290 0 0 0 0 0 596 12:00 PM Al 208 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 251 41 1 294 0 0 0 0 0 548 12:15 PM 35 225 0 2 262 2 0 0 1 3 2 256. 23 0 281 0 0 0 2 2 548 12:30 PM 29 .259 0 - '0 288 1 0 0 2 3 1 256 23 1 281 0 0 0 0 0 572 Total Volume 141 960 0 4 1105 4 0 0 7 11 5 1019 119 3 1146 0 0 0 2 2 2264 % App. Total 12.8 86.9 0 0.4 36.4 0 0 63.6 0.4 88.9 10.4 0.3 0 0 0 100 PHF :860 .896 '.000 .500 .909 .500 .000 .000 '.875 .917 .625 .995 .726 .750 .974 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .950 York Ave Out In Total 1023 1 1105 1 21281 960 0 4 Right Thru Left Peds FJ r Peak Hour Data Z0 H 4=� J � 1 L� p no Z d —� I North ~2 m t a r Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A o' CD o tr i - U s' e - - d r r - m o a y m +, T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 1191 10191 51 3 ®0 1 6 Out In Total WSB & Associates ' 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 69th St File Name : York Ave & 69th St 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code : 00000005 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's ' Page No : 1 r,rni ine Printarl_ I Inehiftarl 03:00 PM 43 From North 11 0 69th St From East 9 16 From South 0 38 69th St From West 217 35 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP.TOW 46 Right I Thru I Left I Peds A2p. Tome Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. T.w Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App. TOW Int.Total 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 42 34 178 157 9 0 6 0 229 197 6 15 11 10 0 12 7 0 27 34 5 6 183 24 0 203 24 0 212 233 41 44 13 13 57 0 43 0 111 100 579 564 Total 76 335 15 0 426 21 23 17 0 61 11 386 48 0 445 85 26 100 0 211 1143 03:00 PM 43 171 11 0 225 9 16 13 0 38 5 217 35 0 257 34 13 46 0 93 613 03:15 PM 37 178 4 0 219 13 13 8 0 34 7 198 12 0 217 39 13 40 0 92 562 03:30 PM 39 185 9 0 233 22 6 17 0 45 7 194 28 0 229 26 23 42 0 91 598 03:45 PM 37 188 8 0 233 10 17 11 0 38 11 254 20 0 285 38 24 40 0 102 658 Total 156 722 32 0 910 54 52 49 0 155 30 863 95 0 988 137 73 168 0 3781 2431 04:00 PM 31 183 6 0 220 13 17 17 0 47 4 197 26 0 227 34 28 35 0 97 591 04:15 PM 34 191 3 0 228 13 26 10 0 49 8 230 35 0 273 41 33 39 0 113 663 04:30 PM 26 171 16 0 213 9 21 10 0 40 7 213 52 0 272 47 32 45 0 124 649 04:45 PM 45 187 11 0 243 11 16 6 0 33 8 221 37 0 266 32 35 39 0 106 648 Total 136 732 36 0 904 46 80 43 0 169 27 861 150 0 1038 154 128 158 0 4401 2551 05:00 PM 34 169 11 0 214 10 23 14 0 47 12 259 45 0 316 37 53 48 0 138 715 05:15 PM 43 200 11 0 254 8 27 12 0 47 10 267 31 0 308 30 29 42 1 102 711 05:30 PM 39 149 9 0 197 10 26 14 0 50 6 210 39 0 255 33 29 54 0 116 618 05:45 PM 46 169 7 0 222 13 33 13 0 59 10 239 29 0 278 29 14 34 0 77 636 Total 162 687 38 0 887 41 109 53 0 203 38 975 144 0 11571 129 125 178 1 433 2680 06:00 PM 44 156 13 0 213 20 16 17 0 53 7 220 41 0 268 32 26 45 0 103 637 06:15 PM 45 155 7 0 207 16 8 9 0 33 6 179 22 0 207 38 17 35 0 90 537 Grand Total 619 2787 141 0 3547 198 288 188 0 674 119 3484 500 0 4103 575 395 684 1 1655 9979 Apprch % 17.5 78.6 4 0 29.4 42.7 27.9 0 2.9 84.9 12.2 0 34.7 23.9 41.3 0.1 Total % 6.2 27.9 1.4 0 35.5 2 2.9 1.9 0 6.8 1.2 34.9 5 0 41.1 5.8 4 6.9 0 16.6 Aft WSB &Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 69th St: File Name : York Ave & 69th St 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code :00000005 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's Page No : 2 69th St 69th St From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thai Celt Peds q':Tebi Ri ht Thru Left Peds q ,Total Right Thru Left Peds A,,. T..1 Ri ht Thru Left Peds q .Tobl Int: Total Peak Hour Analysis. From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 26 171 16 0 213 9 21 10 0 40 7 213 52 0 272 47 32 45 0 124 649 .04:45 PM 45 187 11 0 243 11 16 6 0 33 8 221 37 0 266 32 35 39 0 106 648 05:00 PM. 34 169 11 0 214 10 23 14 0 47 12 259 45 0. 316 37 53 48. 0 138 715 05:15 PM 43 200 11 0 254 8 27 12 0 47 10 267 31 0 308 30 29 42 1 102 711 Total Volume 148 727 49 0 924. 38 87 42 0 167 37 960 165 0 1162 146 149 '174 1 470 2723 % App. Total 16 78.7 5.3 0 22.8 52.1 25.1 0 3.2 82.6 14.2 0 31.1 31.7 37 0.2 PHF .822 .909 .766 .000 .909 .864 .806 .750 .000 .888 .771 .899 .793 .000 .919 .777 .703 .906 .250 .851 .952 Out In Total 1 1172 924 2096 1481 7 49 0 Right Thr u Left Peds Peak Hour Data CD rn North °1 2 m m N Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � 'LOS � + Unshifted N o N _ +, T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 65 960 37 0 ® 6 0 Out In Total Left Peds Peak Hour Data CD rn North °1 2 m m N Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � 'LOS � + Unshifted N o N _ +, T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 65 960 37 0 ® 6 0 Out In Total Ri ht Peds 65 960 37 0 ® 6 0 Out In Total York Ave & 69th St 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN rZrniine Prinfc.i_ I tnahiff —I File Name : York Ave & 69th St -sat Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 11:00 AM 41 York Ave From North 10 0 69th St From East 16 18 York Ave From South 0 47 69th St From West 199 29 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds .Tom Right Thru Left Peds tool Ri hl Thti Left Peds App, Total Ri hl Thru Left Peds App. rode Inl.Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 49 35 138 8 0 183 7 0 195 225 15 12 20 10 0 12 15 0 45 39 6 8 148 20 0 179 33 0 174 220 19 26 8 34 0 14 37 0 61 77 475 561 Total 84 321 15 0 420 27 32 25 0 84 14 327 53 0 394 45 22 71 0 138 1036 11:00 AM 41 160 10 0 211 16 18 13 0 47 9 199 29 0 237 26 13 41 0 80 575 11:15 AM 43 156 3 0 202 15 11 14 0 40 8 197 28 0 233 27 21 40 0 88 563 11:30 AM 42 156 5 0 203 13 18 15 0 46 8 189 42 0 239 30 13 40 0 83 571 11:45 AM 44 231 10 0 285 8 18 14 0 40 1 244 35 0 280 55 16 44 0 115 720 Total 170 703 28 0 901 52 65 56 0 173 26 829 134 0 9891 138 63 165 0 366 2429 12:00 PM 50 154 6 0 210 22 14 18 0 54 11 228 47 0 286 42 20 47 2 111 661 12:15 PM 59 187 10 0 256 15 10 8 0 33 7 254 21 0 282 47 17 41 0 105 676 12:30 PM 44 161 7 0 212 17 21 13 0 51 5 204 33 0 242 43 23 54 0 120 625 12:45 PM 42 179 9 0 230 20 15 7 0 42 4 235 21 0 260 31 14 53 0 98 630 Total 195 681 32 0 908 74 60 46 0 180 27 921 122 0 1070 163 74 195 2 4341 2592 01:00 PM 51 146 8 0 205 17 15 12 0 44 5 212 31 0 248 42 21 56 0 119 616 01:15 PM 54 200 6 0 260 14 18 20 0 52 6 236 34 0 276 45 18 45 0 108 696 01:30 PM 56 162 6 0 224 21 19 12 0 52 7 203 44 0 254 37 21 63 0 121 651 01:45 PM 53 170 4 0 227 9 11 5 0 25 3 233 37 0 273 38 15 36 0 89 614 Total 214 678 24 0 916 61 63 49 0 173 21 884 146 0 1051 162 75 200 0 4371 2577 02:00 PM 48 168 6 0 222 6 16 14 0 36 6 224 38 0 268 43 13 49 0 105 631 02:15 PM 54 196 8 0 258 15 9 18 0 42 5 261 53 0 319 41 27 58 3 129 748 Grand Total 765 2747 113 0 3625 235 245 208 0 688 99 3446 546 0 4091 592 274 738 5 1609 10013 Apprch % 21.1 75.8 3.1 0 34.2 35.6 30.2 0 2.4 84.2 13.3 0 36.8 17 45.9 0.3 Total % 7.6 27.4 1.1 0 36.2 2.3 2.4 2.1 0 6.9 1 34.4 5.5 0 40.9 5.9 2.7 7.4 0 16.1 �to � WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 69th St York Ave From North 69th St From East York Ave From South 69th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. ro�i Right Thru Left Peds App. romi Right Thru Left Peds q .Total File Name : York Ave & 69th St -sat 10:30 -2:30 Site Code : 00000005 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 44 231 10 0 285 8 18 14 0 40 1 244 35 0 280 55 16 44 0 115 720 12:00 PM 50 154 6 0 210 22 .14 . 18 0 54 11 228 47 0 286 42 20 47 2 111. 661 12:15 PM, 59 187 10 0 256 15. 10 8 0 33 7 254: 21 0. 282 47 17 41 0 105 676 12:30 PM 44- 161 7 0 212 17 21 13 0 51 5 204 33 0 242 43 23 54 0 120 625 Total Volume 197. 733 33 0 963 62 63 53 0 178 24 930 136 0 1090 187 76 186 2 451 2682 a/o App. Total 20.5 76.1 3.4 0 34.8 35.4 29.8 0 2.2 85.3 12.5 0 41.5 16.9 41.2 0.4 PHF .835 .793 .825 .000 .845 .705 .750 .736 .000 .824 .545 .915 .723 .000 .953 .850 :826 .861 .250 .940 .931 York Ave Ou Total 63 1 21411 L 197 33 33 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 0 North 4' 1 2 � c F -♦• -2 W m Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A ra rn r r W q Unshifted LJ a H c Ra +, T r Left Thru . Ri h Peds 36 930 24 0 9 3 0 ®3 Out In Total Y—k Ava York Ave From North 69th St From East York Ave From South 69th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. ro�i Right Thru Left Peds App. romi Right Thru Left Peds q .Total Rig ht Thru Left Peds App. roes York Ave Ou Total 63 1 21411 L 197 33 33 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 0 North 4' 1 2 � c F -♦• -2 W m Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A ra rn r r W q Unshifted LJ a H c Ra +, T r Left Thru . Ri h Peds 36 930 24 0 9 3 0 ®3 Out In Total Y—k Ava 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN r-'.- P iM.A_ I 1 -hiHoA File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 7/11/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 41 Southdale Ent From North 22 0 69th St From East 13 57 Entrance From South 2 81 69th St From West 2 11 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds . T.W Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.w 92 Right I Thru I Left Peds A . Tomi Right I Thru I Left FPeds I A,,.,., Int. Total 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 48 37 6 13 1 2 19 0 68 58 10 11 53 12 0 57 14 0 75 82 17 15 1 13 0 2 11 0 31 28 14 8 86 5 0 92 0 2 105 102 279 270 Total 85 8 32 1 126 21 110 26 0 157 32 3 24 0 59 22 178 5 2 207 549 03:00 PM 41 2 22 0 65 13 57 9 2 81 7 2 11 0 20 4 87 0 1 92 258 03:15 PM 42 4 26 0 72 9 46 14 1 70 15 3 12 1 31 6 90 1 1 98 271 03:30 PM 42 5 23 0 70 17 37 4 0 58 10 0 16 0 26 4 101 0 0 105 259 03:45 PM 36 5 19 1 61 9 61 13 0 83 2 1 8 2 13 3 93 2 0 98 255 Total 161 16 90 1 268 48 201 40 3 292 34 6 47 3 90 17 371 3 2 3931 1043 04:00 PM 38 3 39 1 81 14 49 16 0 79 8 2 6 3 19 1 109 1 0 111 290 04:15 PM 43 3 19 0 65 15 60 16 3 94 7 6 10 1 24 4 88 4 0 96 279 04:30 PM 35 2 28 0 65 18 60 12 1 91 10 0 6 3 19 10 102 0 0 112 287 04:45 PM 35 4 22 1 62 17 55 14 1 87 13 1 8 1 23 2 115 0 0 117 289 Total 151 12 108 2 273 64 224 58 5 351 38 9 30 8 85 17 414 5 0 4361 1145 05:00 PM 53 1 28 0 82 9 43 4 1 57 12 0 5 2 19 4 136 0 0 140 298 05:15 PM 42 4 16 1 63 11 51 14 1 77 11 0 2 0 13 8 117 0 0 125 278 05:30 PM 43 2 17 0 62 11 56 26 0 93 10 0 6 0 16 3 124 0 0 127 298 05:45 PM 42 1 15 0 58 8 48 21 1 78 11 2 4 0 17 4 93 1 0 98 251 Total 180 8 76 1 265 39 198 65 3 305 44 2 17 2 65 19 470 1 0 4901 1125 06:00 PM 47 5 19 1 72 12 39 16 0 67 12 2 13 1 28 6 116 0 0 122 289 06:15 PM 50 4 16 0 70 13 46 21 0 80 6 1 9 0 16 3 97 1 0 101 267 Grand Total 674 53 341 6 1074 197 818 226 11 1252 166 23 140 14 343 84 1646 15 4 1749 4418 Apprch % 62.8 4.9 31.8 0.6 15.7 65.3 18.1 0.9 48.4 6.7 40.8 4.1 4.8 94.1 0.9 0.2 Total % 15.3 1.2 7.7 0.1 24.3 4.5 18.5 5.1 0.2 28.3 3.8 0.5 3.2 0.3 7.8 1.9 37.3 0.3 0.1 39.6 Ao WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdal.e Ent -site 2 'Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East Entrance From South 69th St From West Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds n :TOmi File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11 /2012 90's Page No :2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:151P,M- Peak Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 1 of 1 04:45 PM 35 4 22 1 ,62 17 55 14 1 87 13 1 8 1 23 2 115 0 0 117 289 05:00 PM 53 1 28 0 82 9 .43 4 1 57 12 0 5 2' 19 4 136 0 0 140 298 05:15 PM, 42 4. 16 1 63 1.1 51 14 1 77 11 0- 2 0 13 8 117 0. 0 125 278 05:30 PM 43 2 17 0 62 11 56 26 0 93 10 0 6 0 16 3 124 0 0 127 298 Total Volume 173. '.11 83 2 269- :.48 205.. 58 3 314 46, 1 21 3 71 17 492 0 0 509 1163 % App. Total 64.3 4.1 30.9 0.7 15.3 65.3 18.5 1 64.8 1.4 29.6 4.2 3.3 96.7 0 0 PHF .816 .688 .741 .500 .820 .706 .915 .558 .750 .844 .885 .250 .656 .375 .772 .531 .904 .000 .000 .909 .976 �� _s � J F t —� � C ~ t — � R i (5� y O � a Southdale Ent Oul Total �9 69 318 173 11 83 2 Ri ht Thru Left Peds T l [-, Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P Unshifted 41 T r Left Thru i ht Peds 21 1 46 3 Out In Total Fnt.rP � N O i —2 N o' 2 ° m � r A rn �xm U CD wm m W N _ 'Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East Entrance From South 69th St From West Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds n :TOmi Right Thru Left Peds App. romi Right Thru Left Peds roar App Right Thru Left Peds Tavi �� _s � J F t —� � C ~ t — � R i (5� y O � a Southdale Ent Oul Total �9 69 318 173 11 83 2 Ri ht Thru Left Peds T l [-, Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P Unshifted 41 T r Left Thru i ht Peds 21 1 46 3 Out In Total Fnt.rP � N O i —2 N o' 2 ° m � r A rn �xm U CD wm m W N _ 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 -sat Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 (:rn ine Prinfari_ I Inchiftarl 11:00 AM 20 2 18 Southdale Ent From North 20 2 69th St From East 11:30 AM 34 Entrance From South 11 11:45 AM 69th St From West 8 31 Start Time Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Taei Right Thru Left I Peds I App. T.w Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tome Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App, Toes Int. Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 18 19 2 8 0 2 8 0 28 29 18 10 30 14 0 32 15 0 62 57 7 12 2 6 0 5 9 0 15 26 8 9 76 2 0 107 1 0 86 117 191 229 Total 37 4 16 0 57 28 62 29 0 119 19 7 15 0 41 17 183 3 0 203 420 11:00 AM 20 2 18 11:15 AM 20 2 15 11:30 AM 34 4 11 11:45 AM 52 8 31 Total 126 16 75 12:00 PM 40 6 26 12:15 PM 39 5 24 12:30 PM 59 2 33 12:45 PM 50 10 28 Total) 188 23 111 01:00 PM 46 5 26 01:15 PM 44 4 21 01:30 PM 67 8 33 01:45 PM 53 5 18 Total 210 22 98 02:00 PM 50 4 28 02:15 PM 49 10 43 Grand Total 660 79 371 Apprch % 59.5 7.1 33.4 Total % 13.9 1.7 7.8 0 40 15 34 10 0 37 16 34 19 0 49 23 39 14 0 91 26 37 20 0 217 80 144 63 0 72 18 29 23 0 68 22 42 17 0 94 16 41 16 0 88 14 46 13 0 322 70 158 69 0 77 17 55 17 0 69 30 38 28 0 108 18 56 19 0 76 30 43 19 0__330 95 192 83 0 82 18 44 17 0 102 36 47 26 0 1110 327 647 287 0 25.9 51.3 22.8 0 23.4 6.9 13.7 6.1 0 59 8 5 10 0 23 6 92 2 0 100 222 0 69 12 2 5 0 19 8 105 2 0 115 240 0 76 11 2 8 0 21 9 107 1 0 117 263 0 83 17 3 9 0 29 7 124 1 0 132 335 0 287 48 12 32 0 92 30 428 6 0 464 1 1060 0 70 15 3 8 0 26 4 113 0 0 117 285 0 81 17 4 17 0 38 7 129 1 0 137 324 0 73 17 3 11 0 31 3 108 0 0 111 309 0 73 16 1 9 0 26 10 132 0 0 142 329 0 297 65 11 45 0 121 24 482 1 0 507 1247 0 89 14 3 6 0 23 7 151 0 0 158 347 0 96 13 0 14 0 27 8 122 2 0 132 324 0 93 16 4 6 0 26 7 113 3 0 123 350 0 92 13 1 13 0 27 4 129 1 0 134 329 0 370 56 8 39 0 103 26 515 6 0 547 1 1350 0 79 13 3 8 0 24 7 94 2 0 103 288 0 109 20 3 10 0 33 8 113 4 0 125 369 0 1261 221 44 149 0 414 112 1815 22 0 1949 4734 0 53.4 10.6 36 0 5.7 93.1 1.1 0 0 26.6 4.7 0.9 3.1 0 8.7 2.4 38.3 0.5 0 41.2 k°''ol� 69th St & Southdale Ent - site 2 Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East Entrance From South 69th St From West Start Time Right Thni Left Peds ' a r °m File Name : 69th St. &, Southdale Ent -site 2 -sat 10:30 -2 :30 2 t� � c � rn t Site Code :00000002 I y U shifted 7 O Edina, MN - i d a Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No :2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:45 PM 12:45 PM 50 10 28 0 .88 14 46 13 0 73 16 1 9 0 26 10 132 0 0 142 329 01:00 PM 46 5 26 0 77 17 55 17 0 89 14 3 6 0 23 7 151 0 0 158 347 01:15 PM. 44 4, 21 0 69 30 38 28 0 96 13 0 14 0 27 8 122 2 0 132 324 01:30 PM 67 8 33 0 108 18 56 19 0 93 16 4 6 0 26 7 113 3 0 123 350 Total Volume 207 27 108 0 342, 79 195 77 0 351 59 8 35 0 102 32 518. 5 0 555 1350 °/ A . Total 60.5 7.9 31.6 0 22.5 55.6 21.9 0 57.8 7.8 34.3 0 5.8 93.3 0.9 0 PHF :772 .675 .818 .000 .792 .658 .871 .688 .000 .914 .922 .500 .625 .000 .944 .800 .858 .417 .000 .878 .964 Southdale Ent Out In Total 0 342 1 434 207 27 108 0 Right T� Left Peds Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East Entrance From South 69th St From West Start Time Right Thni Left Peds ' a r °m Right Thru Left Peds App. r °mi Right Thru Left Peds r °m Right Thru Left Peds roes Southdale Ent Out In Total 0 342 1 434 207 27 108 0 Right T� Left Peds 41 T r Left Thru Ri h Peds 35 8 59 0 36 02 38 Out In Total �1l � HO 2 m rx� ° W Ct LL � _ N O Peak Hour Data Z F J North 2 t� � c � rn t Peak Hour Begins at 12:45 P I y U shifted 7 O y � i d a 41 T r Left Thru Ri h Peds 35 8 59 0 36 02 38 Out In Total �1l � HO 2 m rx� ° W Ct LL � _ N O 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 3 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN r:rnnne Printorl_ I Inehiftorl . 1 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 3 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 7 Southdale Ent From North 0 0 69th St From East 7 45 Entrance From South 2 80 69th St From West 0 0 Start Time Ri ht I Thal I Left I Peds I API.T.w 65 Right I Thru I Left Peds a .Toai Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.W 13 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP.T.M1 0 Int.7otal 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 8 18 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 18 8 7 43 18 2 37 19 1 71 64 23 17 0 1 0 0 0 2 24 19 8 10 77 43 0 91 31 3 128 135 232 236 Total 26 0 0 1 27 15 80 37 3 135 40 0 1 2 43 18 168 74 3 263 468 03:00 PM 7 0 0 0 7 7 45 26 2 80 12 0 0 0 12 12 65 37 2 116 215 03:15 PM 13 0 0 0 13 3 38 21 1 63 19 0 1 0 20 10 79 37 1 127 223 03:30 PM 10 0 0 0 10 10 40 14 1 65 18 0 1 0 19 17 71 29 1 118 212 03:45 PM 6 0 0 0 6 9 48 12 1 70 22 0 0 1 23 7 82 38 4 131 230 Total 36 0 0 0 36 29 171 73 5 278 71 0 2 1 741 46 297 141 8 492 880 04:00 PM 9 0 0 0 9 13 49 7 1 70 19 0 0 1 20 14 81 33 4 132 231 04:15 PM 9 0 0 0 9 15 63 11 1 90 23 0 0 0 23 12 92 35 1 140 262 04:30 PM 10 0 0 0 10 15 53 22 1 91 25 0 0 0 25 13 98 50 4 165 291 04:45 PM 8 0 0 1 9 14 55 23 2 94 19 0 0 1 20 24 94 44 0 162 285 Total 36 0 0 1 37 57 220 63 5 345 86 0 0 2 881 63 365 162 9 599 1069 05:00 PM 10 0 0 0 10 19 58 13 1 91 20 0 0 2 22 9 105 41 1 156 279 05:15 PM 14 0 0 0 14 7 64 16 0 87 23 0 0 1 24 11 91 50 5 157 282 05:30 PM 7 0 0 0 7 7 64 27 2 100 22 0 2 0 24 21 82 38 1 142 273 05:45 PM 14 0 0 0 14 13 62 21 0 96 15 0 0 0 15 7 69 47 2 125 250 Total 45 0 0 0 45 46 248 77 3 374 80 0 2 3 851 48 347 176 9 580 1084 06:00 PM 10 0 0 11 21 15 71 16 0 102 23 0 2 1 26 12 74 40 3 129 278 06:15 PM 13 0 0 1 14 16 40 13 0 69 24 0 0 0 24 15 80 49 4 148 255 Grand Total 166 0 0 14 180 178 830 279 16 1303 324 0 7 9 340 202 1331 642 36 2211 4034 Apprch % 92.2 0 0 7.8 13.7 63.7 21.4 1.2 95.3 0 2.1 2.6 9.1 60.2 29 1.6 Total % 4.1 0 0 0.3 4.5 4.4 20.6 6.9 0.4 32.3 8 0 0.2 0.2 8.4 5 33 15.9 0.9 54.8 AA- WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 3 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 3 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code :00000003 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 S a romi Int. Total 04:30 PM Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East Entrance From South 69th St From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I pp. Tome Right Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tome I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. mm I Right I Thiu I Left Ped Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 S a romi Int. Total 04:30 PM 10 0 0 0 .10 15 53 22 1 91 25 0 0 0 25 13 98 50 4 165 291 04:45 PM 8 0 0 1 9 14 55 23 2 94 19 0 0 1 20 24 94 44 0 162 285 05:00 PM 10 0 . 0 0 10 19 58 13 1 91 .20 0 0 2. 22 9 105 41 1 156 279 05:15.PM 14 0 0 .0 14 7 64 16 0 87 23 0 0 .. 1 24 11 91 .50 5 .157 282 Total Volume 42. 0 0 1 43 55 230 74 4 363 87 0 0 4 01 57 388 . 185 10 640 1137 % App. Total 97.7 0 0 2.3 1 15.2 63.4 20.4 1.1 95.6 0 0 4.4 8.9 60.6 28.9 1.6 PHF 1 .750 .000 .000 .250 .768 1 .724 .898 .804 .500 .965 .870 .000 .000 .500 .910 .594 .924 .925 .500 .970 .977 4, T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 0 871 4 9 Out In Total �li�" ;U a CA 4 —= N 2 w 0 r w w C. i a nco m x ? Southdale Ent Out In Total 1 2401 3 421 ol 0 Ri ht Thru Left Peds T 1 �► Peak Hour Data Z F� w J T CO CO CO t —► North IA C _ 55 H t Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P m .� Unshifted Q a 4, T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 0 871 4 9 Out In Total �li�" ;U a CA 4 —= N 2 w 0 r w w C. i a nco m x ? 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN (:rnnne Printarl_ I Inehiftarl File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 Site Code :00000004 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 0 Southdale Ent From North 0 0 0 69th St From East 0 0 From South 12 0 69th St From West 0 0 0 Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds a . Tomi Right Thru Left I Peds I APP.Tow 0 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I a . To i Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.W 0 Int. Total 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 23 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05 :30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Total 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 48 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aq WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code :00000004 Edina, MN Start Date 7/10/2012 90's Page No :2 �ll� Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East From South 69th St From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I p .T°bi Right I Thru I Left I Peds I p .i °ai Right I Thru I Left I Peds T °m Right Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.W �ll� Southdale Ent Out In Total I 481 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data «� J Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM- Peak 1 of 1 �E. CO E. o z —► North � y F- Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P 2 2c 0 m m j, 5 4 m r �� Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM r �? o m rn -CD . pw a- mo +, T r 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05:30 PM . 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 05:45 PM 0 0 0 '0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Total Volume 0. 0 0. 0 0 48 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 48 App, Total 0 0 0 0 -100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .923 .000 .000 .000 .923 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .923 �ll� Southdale Ent Out In Total I 481 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data «� J �E. CO E. o z —► North � y F- Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P 2 2c 0 m m j, 5 4 m r �� Unshifled r �? o m rn -CD . pw a- mo +, T r Left ru . Riaht Peds Ol Ol 01 0 Out In Total �ll� 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 -sat Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 11:00 AM 0 Southdale Ent From North 0 0 0 69th St From East 0 0 From South 10 0 69th St From West 0 0 0 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tow Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Toni Right I Thal I Left Peds . T.,, Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total Int. Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 Total 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 43 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 64 01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 01:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Total 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 37 02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 kill 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 -sat Site Code :00000004 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No :2 [::::= : Southdale Ent From North 69th St I I I From East From South 69th St From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I AP.T..l Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. T °m Right I Thru Left I Peds I App, T °6 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. ToWl Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15_ PM -Peak 1 of 1 Int. Total 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:00 PM 0 0 . 0 0 0 26 0 A 0 26 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 26 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7: 0 0 0 7 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Total Volume 0 0 0 . 0 0, _67 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 App, Total 0 - 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .620 .000 .000 000 .620 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .620 -6� H J O 2 L� � C ~ ID L Jra O � a Southdale Ent Out In Total 1 67 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Pads. Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A Uns iHed 41 T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 01 Ol 01 0 Out In Total �J UO O f_S 2 O co EF O � CD o a mm y 0 France Ave & 69th St 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN r�rniine Printari_ I Inehiftari File Name : France Ave & 69th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 7/11/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 5 181 22 France Ave From North 6 182 69th St From East 03:30 PM 8 France Ave From South 26 03:45 PM 69th St From West 182 17 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I 8pp. Tome Right I Thru I Left I Peds .Tome Ri ht I Thru I Left FpedsT P.T.., Right I Thru I Left Peds I App. T.W Int.Total 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 5 7 172 28 0 177 21 0 205 205 29 24 24 46 0 32 63 0 99 119 52 42 270 31 0 256 35 0 353 333 43 49 39 10 1 43 12 0 93 104 750 761 Total 12 349 49 0 410 53 56 109 0 218 94 526 66 0 686 92 82 22 1 197 1511 03:00 PM 5 181 22 03:15 PM 6 182 27 03:30 PM 8 207 26 03:45 PM 8 182 17 Total 27 752 92 04:00 PM 7 180 22 04:15 PM 8 173 18 04:30 PM 12 194 29 04:45 PM 9 192 24 Total 36 739 93 05:00 PM 8 175 27 05:15 PM 1 187 32 05:30 PM 4 158 31 05:45 PM 7 183 17 Total 20 703 107 06:00 PM 5 180 23 06:15 PM 4 177 26 Grand Total 104 2900 390 Apprch % 3.1 85.4 11.5 Total % 0.8 23.4 3.1 0 208 28 22 47 0 215 21 27 59 0 241 20 26 41 0 207 21 42 54 0 871 90 117 201 0 209 15 38 36 0 199 20 34 52 0 235 24 43 38 0 225 22 34 42 0 868 81 149 168 0 210 19 37 39 0 220 23 49 29 0 193 15 33 43 0 207 25 36 39 0 830 82 155 150 0 208 20 34 39 0 207 30 30 53 0 3394 356 541 720 0 22 33.5 44.5 0 27.4 2.9 4.4 5.8 0 971 46 257 48 0 1071 31 251 38 0 871 43 279 42 0 1171 42 222 39 0 4081 162 1009 167 0 89 43 293 42 0 106 36 265 47 0 105 49 296 37 0 98 41 254 41 0 3981 169 1108 167 0 95 60 318 53 0 101 54 321 44 0 91 63 287 42 0 100 52 257 33 0 387 229 1183 172 0 93 68 263 38 0 113 52 263 38 0 1617 774 4352 648 0 13.4 75.4 11.2 0 13.1 6.3 35.1 5.2 /eta 6 0 351 51 31 8 0 90 746 0 320 40 42 9 0 91 733 0 364 48 43 8 1 100 792 0 303 46 41 14 0 101 728 0 1338 185 157 39 1 3821 2999 0 378 38 38 11 0 87 763 0 348 47 47 13 0 107 760 0 382 40 47 6 1 94 816 1 337 58 62 16 1 137 797 1 1445 183 194 46 2 425 3136 0 431 46 50 8 5 109 845 0 419 41 50 5 0 96 836 0 392 47 46 11 0 104 780 0 342 33 41 7 0 81 730 0 1584 167 187 31 5 390 3191 0 369 45 46 13 0 104 774 0 353 50 44 4 0 98 771 1 5775 722 710 155 9 1596 12382 0 45.2 44.5 9.7 0.6 0 46.6 5.8 5.7 1.3 0.1 12.9 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 69th St File Name : France Ave & 69th st 2:30 -6:30 pm Site Code :00000001 Edina, MN Start Date 7 /11/2012 90's Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:30 PM France Ave From North 69th St From East France Ave From South 69th St, From West 235 Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. ToW Right I Thal I Left I Peds I App. TOW Ri ht I Thru Left I Pads I App. Toni Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tome Int.Tatal Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:30 PM 12 194 29 0 235 24 43 38 0 105 49 296 37 0 382 40 47 6 1 94 816 04:45 PM 9 192 .24 0 225 22 34 42 0 98 41 254 41 1 337 58 62 16 1 137 797 05:00 PM 8 175. 27 0 210 19, 37 39 0 95 60 318 .53 0 .431 46 50 .8 5 109 . 845 05:15 PM 1 187 32 0 220 23 49 29 0 101 54 321 44 0 419 41 50 5 0 96 836 TotalVolurne 30 7.48 112 0 890 88 163 148 0 399 204. 1189 175 1 1569 185 209 35 7. 436 3294 % App. Total 3.4 84 12.6 0 1 22.1 40.9 37.1 0 13 75.8 11.2 0.1 42.4 47.9 8 1.6 PHF .625 .964 .875 .000 .947 .917 .832 .881 .000 .950 .850 .926 .825 .250 .910 .797 .843 .547 .350 .796 .975 4 T r Left Thru Peds 1751 11891 2041 1 56 650 Out In Total Fra a A�.a France Ave ut In Joist 3 EzO 30 8 11 0 i Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data � wo — ► North -2 in Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P W W 'toy —, r. . _ r- co (D oo - d. N O 4 T r Left Thru Peds 1751 11891 2041 1 56 650 Out In Total Fra a A�.a France Ave & 69th St 10:30 -6:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN PriM -4- I I— hiff.'I File Name : France Ave & 69th st -sat Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 11:00 AM 0 137 24 France Ave From North 3 123 69th St From East 11:30 AM 8 France Ave From South 34 11:45 AM 69th St From West 157 35 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds A .Toni Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. Toll Right Thru Left Peds .T.W Right Thru Left Peds App. Tom) Int.Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 0 20 101 25 0 95 35 0 126 150 15 14 16 27 0 13 26 0 58 53 45 61 191 20 0 244 25 0 256 330 48 45 46 14 0 42 1 0 108 88 548 621 Total 20 196 60 0 276 29 29 53 0 111 106 435 45 0 586 93 88 15 0 196 1169 11:00 AM 0 137 24 11:15 AM 3 123 30 11:30 AM 8 151 34 11:45 AM 4 157 35 Total 15 568 123 12:00 PM 3 154 28 12:15 PM 4 126 37 12:30 PM 2 161 28 12:45 PM 13 150 37 Total 22 591 130 01:00 PM 16 123 29 01:15 PM 12 154 49 01:30 PM 8 138 27 01:45 PM 7 146 33 Total 43 561 138 02:00 PM 4 135 40 02:15 PM 7 148 32 Grand Total 111 2199 523 Apprch % 3.9 77.6 18.5 Total % 1 19.3 4.6 0 161 17 18 30 0 156 18 20 26 0 193 21 22 37 0 196 25 14 56 0 706 81 74 149 0 185 24 26 42 0 167 24 21 44 0 191 45 25 46 0 200 24 29 45 0 743 117 101 177 0 168 35 37 40 0 215 36 25 33 0 173 45 35 51 0 186 35 13 53 0 742 151 110 177 0 179 37 25 55 0 187 33 11 43 0 2833 448 350 654 0 30.9 24.1 45 0 24.8 3.9 3.1 5.7 0 651 48 232 19 0 64 63 232 34 0 80 52 286 34 0 95 61 283 29 0 3041 224 1033 116 0 92 63 284 17 0 89 52 294 31 0 116 51 262 28 0 98 90 350 22 0 395 256 1190 98 0 112 106 279 22 0 94 61 326 25 0 131 55 251 16 0 101 60 348 38 0 438 282 1204 101 0 117 47 238 21 0 87 44 257 34 0 1452 959 4357 415 0 16.7 76 7.2 0 12.7 8.4 38.2 3.6 CYI 0 299 37 37 12 0 86 611 0 329 42 30 6 0 78 627 0 372 27 58 15 1 101 746 0 373 54 49 15 0 118 782 0 1373 160 174 48 1 3831 2766 0 364 28 32 12 0 72 713 0 377 35 61 6 0 102 735 0 341 24 29 10 0 63 711 0 462 38 45 6 0 89 849 0 1544 125 167 34 0 326 3008 0 407 43 47 8 0 98 785 0 412 50 31 9 0 90 811 0 322 20 51 10 3 84 710 0 446 29 36 5 0 70 803 0 1587 142 165 32 3 3421 3109 0 306 37 34 10 0 81 683 0 335 31 28 7 0 66 675 0 5731 588 656 146 4 1394 11410 0 42.2 47.1 10.5 0.3 0 50.2 5.2 5.7 1.3 0 12.2 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 69th St France Ave From North 69th St - From East France Ave From South 69th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds romi File Name : France Ave & 69th st -sat 10:30 -6:30 Site Code : 00000001 Edina, MN - Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15, PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:30 PM 12:30 PM 2 161, 28 0 191 45 25 46 0 116 51 262 28 0 341 24 29 10 0 63 711 12:45 PM 13 150 37 0 200 24 29 45 0 98 90 350 22 0 462 38 45 6 0 89 849 01:00 PM 16 123: 29 0 168 35: 37 40 0 112 106 279 22 0 407 43 47 8 0 98 785 01:15 PM 12 154 49 0 215 36 25 33 0 94 61 326 25 0 412 60 31 9 0 90 811 Total volume 43 588 143 0 774 140 116 164 0 420 308 1217 97 0 1622 155 152 33 0 340 3156 % App. Total 5.6 76 18.5 0 33.3 27.6 39 0 19 75 6 0 45.6 44.7 9.7 0 PHF 672 .913 -.730 .000 .900 .778 :784 .891 .000 .905 .726 .869 .866 .000 .878 .775 .809 .825 .000 .867 .929 1 �� s o � CO H J t —i t- � N L Fca N� v d o_ France Ave Out In Total ® 2164 3 588 rl 4 3 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 12:30 Pj, Unshifted 4 I Left acts 1 971 12171 308 0 90 62 59 Out In Total o W p —2 � 2 � � N � �x A y O France Ave From North 69th St - From East France Ave From South 69th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds romi Right Thru Left Peds q .rutai Right Thru Left Peds q semi Right Thal Left- Peds ADD. TO�I 1 �� s o � CO H J t —i t- � N L Fca N� v d o_ France Ave Out In Total ® 2164 3 588 rl 4 3 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 12:30 Pj, Unshifted 4 I Left acts 1 971 12171 308 0 90 62 59 Out In Total o W p —2 � 2 � � N � �x A y O see map for site 6 2:30 -6:30 Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN r-'.— DriM.A_ r lh 1 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 0 Southdale Ent From North 0 0 0 Southdale Ent From East 17 0 Southdale Ent From South 36 0 Southdale Ent From West 17 0 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I IIPP,T.W 0 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.w 60 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.W 0 Ri ht I Thru I Left Peds a .Tom, Int.Total 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11 13 0 0 35 0 0 17 46 0 0 0 7 0 0 15 0 7 15 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 28 77 Total 0 0 0 0 0 15 48 0 0 63 0 0 22 0 22 20 0 0 0 20 105 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 19 17 0 0 36 0 0 17 0 17 7 0 0 0 7 60 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 27 0 0 38 0 0 36 0 36 16 0 0 0 16 90 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 20 0 0 33 0 0 33 0 33 9 0 0 0 9 75 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 25 0 0 41 0 0 36 0 36 7 0 0 0 7 84 Total 0 0 0 0 0 59 89 0 0 148 0 0 122 0 122 1 39 0 0 0 39 309 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 38 0 38 6 0 0 0 6 82 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 33 0 0 48 0 0 40 0 40 12 0 0 0 12 100 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 31 0 0 39 0 0 52 0 52 9 0 0 0 9 100 04745 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 28 0 0 43 0 0 57 0 57 8 0 0 0 8 108 Total 0 0 0 0 0 50 118 0 0 168 0 0 187 0 1871 35 0 0 0 35 390 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 41 0 0 57 0 0 52 0 52 9 0 0 0 9 118 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 0 0 48 0 0 61 0 61 13 0 0 0 13 122 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 46 0 0 59 0 0 46 0 46 9 0 0 0 9 114 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 37 0 0 57 0 0 48 0 48 10 0 0 0 10 115 Total 0 0 0 0 0 65 156 0 0 221 0 0 207 0 207 41 0 0 0 41 1 469 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 23 0 0 43 0 0 59 0 59 15 0 0 0 15 117 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 53 0 0 65 0 0 53 0 53 12 0 0 0 12 130 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 221 487 0 0 708 0 0 650 0 650 162 0 0 0 162 1520 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 31.2 68.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 32 0 0 46.6 0 0 42.8 0 42.8 10.7 0 0 0 10.7 A«I� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 6 Southdale Ent From North Southdale Ent From East Southdale Ent From South Southdale Ent From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. romi File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 2:30 -6:30 Right Thru -Left Peds rom c v _ t Site Code :00000006 Peak Hour Begins at 05:30 P Edina, MN ° 'L� y Class r `^ m W Start Date : 7/10/2012 900s O Page No : 2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02'.30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:30 PM 05:30 PM .0 0 0 0 0 13 46 0 0 59 0 0 46 0 .46 9 0 0 0 9 114 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 37 0 0 57 0 0 48 0 48 10 0 0 0 -10 115 06:00 PM 0 0- 0 0 0 20 23 0 0 43 0 0. 59 0 59 15 0 0 0 1s 117 06:15.PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 53 0 0 65 0 0 53 0 53 12 0 0 0 12 130 Total Volume 0. 0 0 0 0. 65 159 0 0 224 0. 0 206 0 206 46 0 0 0 46 476 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 29 71 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 000 .000 .000 .813 .750 .000 .000 .862 .000 .000 .873 .000 .873 .767 .000 .000 .000 .767 .915 Southdale Ent Out In Total 65 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds, Peak Hour Data O Southdale Ent From North Southdale Ent From East Southdale Ent From South Southdale Ent From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. romi Right Thru Left Peds mmi Right Thru Left Peds App. Toa� Right Thru -Left Peds rom Southdale Ent Out In Total 65 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds, Peak Hour Data O J UO ~ N w North �2 rn ° c v _ t Peak Hour Begins at 05:30 P d � ° 'L� y Class r `^ m W O 4, T r Le Thru Ri ht Peds 206 0 0 0 ® 06 ®5 Out In Total see map for site 6 10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 -sat Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 11:00 AM 0 Southdale Ent From North 0 0 Southdale Ent From East 15 21 Southdale Ent From South 0 36 Southdale Ent From West 0 56 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds .reel Ri hl Thru Left Peds a .roes Ri ht ThfU Left Peds a .reel Right Thru Lett Peds App. r,ei Int.Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 16 27 0 0 23 0 0 45 39 0 0 0 46 0 0 71 0 46 71 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 96 113 Total 0 0 0 0 0 34 50 0 0 84 0 0 117 0 117 8 0 0 0 8 209 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 21 0 0 36 0 0 56 0 56 1 0 0 0 1 93 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 0 0 34 0 0 72 0 72 2 0 0 0 2 108 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 0 0 38 0 0 61 0 61 1 0 0 0 1 100 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 16 20 0 0 36 0 0 76 0 76 9 0 0 0 9 121 Total 0 0 0 0 0 55 89 0 0 144 0 0 265 0 265 13 0 0 0 13 422 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 0 0 46 0 0 73 0 73 6 0 0 0 6 125 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 47 0 0 60 0 0 74 0 74 13 0 0 0 13 147 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 0 0 43 0 0 72 0 72 14 0 0 0 14 129 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 83 0 83 17 0 0 0 17 138 Total 0 0 0 0 0 54 133 0 0 187 0 0 302 0 3021 50 0 0 0 50 539 01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 0 0 44 0 0 99 0 99 10 0 0 0 10 153 01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 0 0 42 0 0 75 0 75 6 0 0 0 6 123 01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 84 0 84 3 0 0 0 3 125 01:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 36 0 0 44 0 0 77 0 77 14 0 0 0 14 135 Total 0 0 0 0 0 46 122 0 0 168 0 0 335 0 335 1 33 0 0 0 33 536 02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 0 0 32 0 0 87 0 87 16 0 0 0 16 135 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 0 0 37 0 0 70 0 70 20 0 0 0 20 127 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 207 445 0 0 652 0 0 1176 0 1176 140 0 0 0 140 1968 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 31.7 68.3 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 22.6 0 0 33.1 0 0 59.8 0 59.8 7.1 0 0 0 7.1 App WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 6 Southdale Ent From North Southdale Ent From East Southdale Ent From South Southdale Ent From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds romi File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 -sat 10:30 -2:30 m � � N O) o d — N Site Code : 00000006 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 - in Tolal Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM —Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 47 0 0 60 0 0 74 0 74 13 0 0 0 13 147 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 0 0 43 0 0 . 72 0. 72, _14,__0_ �0_ 0 14 129 12:45 PM. 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0. 83 0 83 17 0 0 0 17 138 01700 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 0 0 44 0 0 99 0 99 10 0 0 0 10 153 Total Volume 0 0 '0 - 0 0. 54 131 0 0 185 0 0 328 0 328 54 0 0 0 54 567 % App, Total 0 0 0 0 29.2 70.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .900 .697 .000 .000 .771 .000 .000 .828 .000 .828 .794 .000 .000 .000 .794 .926 5 -�O J H w O 2 m C F- c0 — a 0 o � � uJ � b y 0 D a Southdale Ent Out In Total =10 Right Th Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 12:15 P lass 1 4, Left Thru Ri ht Peds 328 0 0 0 ® 328 382 Out In Total Southdale Ent From North Southdale Ent From East Southdale Ent From South Southdale Ent From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds romi Right Thru Left Peds p ro�i Right Thru Left Peds Alp. Right That Left Peds App. 5 -�O J H w O 2 m C F- c0 — a 0 o � � uJ � b y 0 D a Southdale Ent Out In Total =10 Right Th Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 12:15 P lass 1 4, Left Thru Ri ht Peds 328 0 0 0 ® 328 382 Out In Total T O C F_S 2, O m W O C g � n � �x o m � � N O) o d — N O see map for site 7 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN f'—.— Prinfe i_ I 1 —hill —i i t File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 0 Southdale From North 0 0 0 southdale From East 25 0 Southdale From South 25 0 southdale From West 3 0 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds A .Tote Ri ht Thru Left Peds A .To al Ri ht Thru Left Peds .Tome Right I ThrU I Left I Peds I 111P.TOW 25 Int. Total 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 29 0 0 23 29 0 0 3 1 1 5 1 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 35 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 1 0 52 0 8 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 63 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 9 3 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 37 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 25 0 0 27 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 19 0 3 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 91 0 0 94 0 13 9 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 116 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 19 0 3 6 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 28 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 6 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 36 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 4 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 38 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 102 0 0 103 0 15 19 0 341 0 0 0 0 0 137 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 1 0 27 0 3 7 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 37 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 29 0 7 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 41 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 0 0 28 0 6 11 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 45 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 36 0 6 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 47 Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 115 1 0 120 0 22 28 0 501 0 0 0 0 0 170 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 0 17 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 25 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 35 0 0 36 0 5 12 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 53 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 11 409 2 0 422 0 68 73 1 142 0 0 0 0 0 564 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 2.6 96.9 0.5 0 0 47.9 51.4 0.7 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 2 72.5 0.4 0 74.8 0 12.1 12.9 0.2 25.2 0 0 0 0 0 hl a� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S .Minneapolis,. MN see map for site 7 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 2:30 -6.30 pm Southdale From North southdale From East Edina, MN southdale From West Start Time 90's Right Thru Left Peds A .Tome Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Toms 27 0 3 7 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 37 0515 PM 0 0 .. 0 0 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 0500 PM 0 29 0 7 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 Slte Code : 00000007 Start Date :7/10/M2 Page No : 2 Int. Total 05:00 PM Southdale From North southdale From East Southdale From South southdale From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds A :mai Right Thru Left Peds A .Tome Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Toms Int. Total 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 1 0 27 0 3 7 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 37 0515 PM 0 0 .. 0 0 0 —1 28 0 0 29 0 7 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 41 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 0. 0 28 0 6 11 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 45 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 36 0 6 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 47 Total Volume 0. 0 0 0 0 4 115 1 0 120 0 22 28 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 170 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 3.3 95.8 0.8 0 0 44 56 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .799 .250 .000' .833 .000 .786 .636 .000 .735 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .904 Southdale Out In Total © 1 26 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data Z� � T O J h � North d_ � 6 c 5 O Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P O C E y Unshifted O� d 41 T r+ Left Ri ht Peds 281 221 Ol 0 50 D Out , Total R;— !hdaly A �O 4—� 2 o c 'tea rx O at m O Q N N _ N O O see map for site 7 2:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN r-'.— PriMo,4_ i 1 —haft -4 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 -sat Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 0 Southdale From North 0 0 0 southdale From East 29 0 Southdale From South 29 0 southdale From West 6 0 Start Time Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.w Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Ap.Totai Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP.Tow 0 Riclht I Thru I Left Peds I Alp. 1.1 Int.ToWl 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 0 33 0 0 39 33 0 0 5 5 1 8 4 0 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 45 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 1 0 72 0 13 9 1 23 0 0 0 0 0 95 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 29 0 9 6 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 44 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 0 0 31 0 4 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 38 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 32 1 0 34 0 8 5 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 47 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 0 31 0 7 4 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 42 Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 119 3 0 125 0 28 18 0 461 0 0 0 0 0 171 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 1 0 25 0 2 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 35 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 5 7 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 51 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 0 30 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 36 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 32 0 2 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 39 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 123 2 0 126 0 13 22 0 351 0 0 0 0 0 161 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 1 0 42 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 50 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 0 0 37 0 8 5 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 50 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 1 0 35 0 6 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 45 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 41 0 9 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 52 Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 149 2 0 155 0 28 14 0 421 0 0 0 0 0 197 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 28 0 12 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 44 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 0 0 32 0 4 5 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 41 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 11 519 8 0 538 0 98 72 1 171 0 0 0 0 0 709 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 2 96.5 1.5 0 0 57.3 42.1 0.6 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 73.2 1.1 0 75.9 0 13.8 10.2 0.1 24.1 0 0 0 0 0 4[3,0 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 7 Southdale File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 -sat 2:30 -6:30 pm 01 0 0 0 Site Code : 00000007 Edina, MN Peak Hour Data V� �� Start Date : 7/10/2012 O H g0's p � .. v o r� H North Page No : 2 z — Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P n Southdale U shifted N Southdale O ° " a Southdale °o cam cn — » P From North w From East From South From West Start Time Right Thni Left Peds ' a .romi Right Thru Left Peds a .Southdale mml Right Thru' Left a .romi Right Thru L_ ft Peds .rams Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM'- Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 1 0 42 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 50 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 0 0 37 0 8 5 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 50 05:30 PM: 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 1 0 35 0 6 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 45 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 41 0 9 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 _ 52 Total Volume 0. 0 0 0 0 4 149 2 0 155 0 28 14 0 42 0 0 .. 0 0 0 197 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 2.6 96.1 1.3 0 0 66.7 33.3 0 0 0 0 0 PHI .000 .000 '.000 .000 .000 .500 .909 .500 .000 .923 .000 .778 .700 .000 .808 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .947 *- . T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 141 281 01 0 Out In Total .Cnlllhllaln' Southdale ut otal i2 32 0 EM Peds *- . T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 141 281 01 0 Out In Total .Cnlllhllaln' Southdale ut otal i2 32 0 EM 01 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data V� �� T O H p � .. v o r� H North � 2 2 ° o c z — Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P n + U shifted N fD O ° " a .. °o cam cn — » P w *- . T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 141 281 01 0 Out In Total .Cnlllhllaln' see map for site 10 2:30 -6:30 Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN r Ina Prinforf_ 1 Inehiftcri I I File Name : Southdale Ent -site 10 Site Code : 00000010 Start Date : 7/11/2012 Page No : 1 03:00 PM 0 Southdale Ent From North 51 0 Southdale Ent From East 0 0 Southdale Ent From South 03:15 PM 0 Southdale Ent From West 59 0 Start Time Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds Tobl Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ADD. Tomi Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds A .Torsi Ri ht I Thru I Lejj Peds I A .T..I Int.Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 0 0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 76 0 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 0 0 16 42 0 17 61 0 58 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 78 Total 0 33 103 0 136 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 136 03:00 PM 0 17 51 0 68 0 0 0 0 03:15 PM 0 15 59 0 74 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 20 58 0 78 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 35 46 0 81 0 0 0 0 Total 0 87 214 0 301 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 7 76 0 83 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 24 49 2 75 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 19 44 2 65 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 31 50 0 81 0 0 0 0 Total 0 81 219 4 304 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 34 49 0 83 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 29 68 0 97 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 18 65 0 83 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 23 36 0 59 0 0 0 0 Total 0 104 218 0 322 0 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 26 60 0 86 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 21 35 0 56 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 352 849 4 1205 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0 29.2 70.5 0.3 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 29.2 70.5 0.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 413a- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 74 0 78 0 81 01 301 0 83 0 75 0 65 0 81 0 304 0 83 0 97 0 83 0 59 01 322 0 86 0 56 0 1205 0 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 1.0 2:30 -6:30 Edina, MN 90's File Name :Southdale Ent -site 10 Peak Hour Data T Nort Date 7/11/2012 Page No : 2 CD Cn Southdale Ent Out In -Total zo M _ � N . 0 � a 3 2 0 Right T� Le -fl Peds C O J F C O w. 2_� c v L_ L CO h Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P Unshifted I Left Thru Ri h Peds 0 0 0 0 ® 0 D Out In Total Cnthrlala Fnl Site Code 00000010 Start �o W° � o � � y r o iD m m o d � d a O A13 3. r,rat Southdale Ent Southdale Ent Southdale Ent Southdale Ent F1=om North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds a .roar Right Thru Left Peds a .roes Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. i,m Right Thru Left- Peds App. Int. Total - Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 31 50 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 05:00 PM 0 34 49 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 05:15 PM 0 29 68 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 05:30 PM 0 18 65 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 Total Volume 0 112 232 0 344. 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 344 %A . Total 0 32.6 67.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .824 .853 .000 .887 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ..000 .000 .887 Southdale Ent Out In -Total zo M _ � N . 0 � a 3 2 0 Right T� Le -fl Peds C O J F C O w. 2_� c v L_ L CO h Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P Unshifted I Left Thru Ri h Peds 0 0 0 0 ® 0 D Out In Total Cnthrlala Fnl Site Code 00000010 Start �o W° � o � � y r o iD m m o d � d a O A13 3. r,rat _ � N . 0 � a 3 2 0 Right T� Le -fl Peds C O J F C O w. 2_� c v L_ L CO h Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P Unshifted I Left Thru Ri h Peds 0 0 0 0 ® 0 D Out In Total Cnthrlala Fnl Site Code 00000010 Start �o W° � o � � y r o iD m m o d � d a O A13 3. see map for site 10 .10:30 -2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN ('m. — DAM-4 I 1— kiff.A 4 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 10 -sat Site Code : 00000010 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 11:00 AM 0 Southdale Ent From North 18 0 Southdale Ent From East 0 0 Southdale Ent From South 11:15 AM 0 Southdale Ent From West 39 0 Start Time Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds . Toth Ri ht Thru Left I Peds I Am. Total Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.Tow Right I Thru I Lefl Ped App. Toni int. Total 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 0 0 38 23 0 39 51 0 61 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 90 Total 0 77 74 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 11:00 AM 0 6 18 0 24 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 23 39 0 62 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 32 44 0 76 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 38 59 0 97 0 0 0 0 Total 0 99 160 0 259 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 0 39 60 0 99 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 0 33 51 0 84 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 0 28 45 0 73 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 32 46 0 78 0 0 0 0 Total 0 132 202 0 334 0 0 0 0 01:00 PM 0 23 60 0 83 0 0 0 0 01:15 PM 0 22 55 0 77 0 0 0 0 01:30 PM 0 27 60 0 87 0 0 0 0 01:45 PM 0 26 62 0 88 0 0 0 0 Total 0 98 237 0 335 0 0 0 0 02:00 PM 0 38 61 0 99 0 0 0 0 02:15 PM 0 16 48 0 64 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 460 782 0 1242 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0 37 63 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 37 63 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 62 0 76 0 97 01 259 0 99 0 84 0 73 0 78 0 334 0 83 0 77 0 87 0 88 01 335 0 99 0 64 0 1242 0 t WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map site 10 , Southdale Ent _ From North Southdale Ent From East- Southdale Ent From South Southdale. Ent From West Start Time Right Thrti Left Peds' A :r °m� Right Thru Left Peds T °m� File Name :.Southdale Ent- site 10 -sat 10:30 -2:30 ,_= 2 c 0 3 Peak Hour Begins at 11:30 A m m Unshifted � �� o rn � Site Code : 00000010 o Edina, MN N a N A � Start Date : 7%21/2012 pt cloudy Page No :. 2 In Tolal Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15,PM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 0 32 44 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 11:45 AM 0 38 59 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 97 12:00 PM: 0 39 60 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 99 12:15 PM 0 33 51 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 Toial,Volume 0 142 214:. .. 0 356 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 356 App, Total 0 39.9 60.1 . 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 PHF 000 .910 892 000 899 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 :000 .000 .000 .000 .899 W H� J W. L� 6 c m— v � L J o j � N ti Southdale Ent Out In Total 0 356 1 356 0 142 214 0 Ri ht Thru Left Peds � l Peak Hour Data Southdale Ent _ From North Southdale Ent From East- Southdale Ent From South Southdale. Ent From West Start Time Right Thrti Left Peds' A :r °m� Right Thru Left Peds T °m� Right Thru Left Peds a .r °�� Right Thru Left' Peds App. Toms W H� J W. L� 6 c m— v � L J o j � N ti Southdale Ent Out In Total 0 356 1 356 0 142 214 0 Ri ht Thru Left Peds � l Peak Hour Data y C QO North G rn O ,_= 2 c 0 3 Peak Hour Begins at 11:30 A m m Unshifted � �� o rn � o N a N A � Le i ht Peds 0 0 0 ® 0 Out In Total SknTraffic Simulation Summary Existing 2012 PM - weekday Mass —al E6ec6vemss K:\ 01686 - 3401 Traf flclSynchro�20121PMIEsistlng12012 PM_MOEs TAB: [MOEs] At36 6/2912012 2: 69th Street & Soulhdds SW mnmmnn ® ©onm ©mmmn © ©oteottt ©tts mt�t�t�ttt■tot�t�t� tmnnmmnnmmntentnt�mnnoeeottatts mt�t�t�t�t�totot� omn ®mem ® ®nm ®�� o ©teneteett ©tts mtt 'mtmtmtmtmtmtetetm ©ttstt�ttmtt�ttt■ttt■ttt■ mnn ® ®nn© ©tats ©t ©t�mnn ©oeett ©tts mmememmmm ®m ®tntm,menneeett ©tts mteto ®am�� tmnnnnnnnnnnn=MlMnnnoeettstts tmttt■ttt■tt�tt�ttt■ttt■tmttn oneteen® temtet�©® monteeteteettt© tts��tattntt�ttt ■ttt■ttt■ttt■ttt■ttt■ mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnneenme mM=MMMMMM mn�nononemm�me'mn ©nteeott ©tts m��nm�� tmmotemmm © ® ®t ©et ®t�momm ©Homo 'mmmmtmo�� ommte® emmmteeet© t�onme © © ©tt ®t ©��tmtmtt ®ttsttsttts�� mn�mmm ® ®m ®m ©t ®ttemmm © ©eett ®tts mtet®tmtmtmMMM mm ®mm ®mme © ©otetommtee ©nnm© mmmtmmMMMM mmnnm ©nnmtenetet�mennooettstts MMMMMMM== on ®ennnennm ©emone ©eeeee��e = = =©n M== mnnnnnnnnnnntet mnnneteettstts MMMMMM�� is m�MMMMMMM mmenmmmno ®t ©nt ®t�,m © ©neoett ©tts M===M M=M= M=M= enm © ®em© ®Hen ®mennneoeee��e�� mnnnnnnnnnnnemlmnnneeeee mM = = = = =MM monnnnnnnnonom�mnnn00000 Im�� tmn®memn nno =MM omtemmmnme ®ts ©tmta otenntetee ©e�� MMMMMMe ®m mm ©ne ®�nmtenntetemennteteettntts mmmtemtmt = == mmmm ®mmmmoonmmm © ©n© ©000 mts ®�mm�� .. mmm ©tmm ® ©mtemnee',mnnnteoo ©o mnmeem�� mnneenn©© tenntnt�mnnmeeett�tts��e��tt © ®� meemmnm ®sorer ® ®t ®t�mneeeeettstts MMMMM ®amt® mnnnnnnnnnnnommnnnoeetets MMMMMMMMM mnnnnnnnnnnntetomnnn000totts m�� onntennnnnnnnemonneeseee ta�� m ® ®n��mnmtet ©nt ©tam ©nneeettstts m��s ®�� mnnnnnnnnnnnom,mnnnMnnt o MMMMMM =MM 'smmmom ®mtm ®mm�ommem ©nteono mmmomoo ®� ooee�s m�e�® is ®tett�lontetetente © ©��e��e��eme mnm ®�mnm� ©s ® ©t ©�meme ©net ©ts mtetmtmtmtmtmtmt® mm ®e ®mno ®nsno ©tnmmnm © ©nt ©t© mtntototototstmte K:\ 01686 - 3401 Traf flclSynchro�20121PMIEsistlng12012 PM_MOEs TAB: [MOEs] At36 6/2912012 SlmT.Me Slm "UOn Summary 811712012 2014 PM NO BUILD - Weekday Mea -msof EReclW as EP- K:1 01686340 %Trefic1Synchra120141PMWo BuIId12014 PM NO BUILD MOEs TAB: jMOEs] �` 8292012 mommeo ®memo ®ommeem© ©Hato oeat�mt ® ®�� 2: 69th Stmet S�dl, SIN me® eem®® mCnsammmm ®Cnntats�1m�sstst� . ®mts ee ®meneeCe ®n ®m�neeeeet ®ta ett,t�tm�t ®tm�ts mC ®te ®mmme © ® ® ®mmennCCesmts m�tt■�et ®e ®tm 'mn ®mmn�mena ® ®mmn ®nnnnt ©ts ms ®�� ®�� mnnmmnnmannnnm mnnnnnntetm'� msss�se�� a ©mmm ©CemCa ©arse ©sCeeests ms��ss�s� mCC ®mCC ®mCCCemmCCeoeetsts must ®�tt■ ®�tm meomosoo� © ®net�mn ©seas ®� mmmma�sss . mnnnnnnnnnnCnmmnnCOenota 1�astssstssss oCmCCCemmCes ®tmeC ® ©eoset ®ta a ®�st ®s,� ®st mnCCCCCCnCeCemmnCCSeCtsts mtstsststsstss mnnmm�enonanmmmC ©nnont ©e msssmt ®sss .. 'mn�m ® ®me ® ® ®ntmt� mm ®m ©Cnm ®A� mm�m�� ®ss !oeCO ®emem ® ® ® ®mmm ®m © © ©et© ee ®tntmt� ®�� me�te�eCn� ®aeemmm ®C ©Ceram ats ®tn ®mot ©�tm mteteteo ®mtmmna ®nmmem © ©nnmt® m ®�� ®,asses, mesnmosnmmnnmmmsnnnnnaa11mst�s ©eess� mCm ©mCm ©� ® © © ®meCC ©seer ©ts ets�� ®� ®� mnnennnennnnemmsnneeetsts e��ss�sess mnnomsameo0sammnnneeeoe ms�ss ®tse� =nnnnnnnnnn m ©enmemmm�an ®m,mnooennt ©a� ms�snaass nCnmmnnnonnae mssssssss mnmmmnafl ©e�Cm ®mmmnmmnnnme , mss�mess� e ®CmenCmeCa ©amenCn ©oee ©e MMMM=s©MM msmnssmnee ®C ®mme�eC ®setae aen�eCC�sss mtm ®temtemtmmn©nmmmmmnnnnma 'mtmmsmm ®nee ®n ®mmmnnCnoee meme�esses� mnC©© CC © ©nnnemmnnneeeets��est��mt ©�� mCCS ®C�m�C ®Cemmne ©44444 a��t ©t ©e® mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnmm asstsessstss Cl cdadon Rd mnnnnnnnnnnnmmmnnnnnnmw mssssssss onCCCCCCCCaCemenCCeeee atsss��sess me ®CS® ®semen ®mm ©CCeeese ass�aess�s mCCCCCCnnnnnnmmCCCOe9eees mssssssss mama ®e ©mom ®anmmmomnnnn a ' meemo ®mm�� emmm ®mom ® ®aseemosee ©Commm 'metetemm ® ®e ®n ©emmmmC ©CCmta aat ®�tss�t ®tm® mmnammnm ®aan ®mmm ©s ©Comm soma ®e ®me K:1 01686340 %Trefic1Synchra120141PMWo BuIId12014 PM NO BUILD MOEs TAB: jMOEs] �` 8292012 BknTraMc Simul Uon 8wr q 8111/2012 2014 PM BUILD ALT 1 -Weektl y Meezwes or 68ecll —S, K:1 01686- 3401Tmffic1Synchro120141PMSuild Alt 112014 PM BUILD ALT 1 MOEe TAB: ]MOEe] Pi 812912012 BE e© mmmn ®mmnn ®nmto ©ennnnae��'en ©�� mnne ©121212 ©nenn�mnnennnee �� ®nom m ®oem ®mnenn ©memo ©121212121212 mnmman�� . mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnnn m�� one© ®non ®neeemton ©ennn ©n��e�� mnnmmnnnnnnmmt�;mnneeeeae m��ae� mmm�mnomm� ©n ©mmn ©12121212 ©n m��nm�� I� mm�emm�m� ©m ©nemmom ©nnno��'mm ®moo�� mnmm�emm� © ® © ®mtmmm� ©12121212 mnn� ®enmm mmmmmmmmonnn ©mmoee © ©nn© mm�mmm�� meemmmnmmo ©nee ®nnnnnnan m��nn�� oem © ®n ®mm�en ©mtmnnennnee e�� ®n�� mnnnnnnnnennemtmnnneeeee m�� en © ©mn © ©mnnnnmmnn ©1212121212 m��nn�� mmno ©mnm ©nnnnomnn ©121212 ©n mnn�� oem ©oee ©e ®ennmto ©nnnnnae o��an�� men ©menen ©n ©oemnn ©ee000 a ©n��s�� mn ©menommnomnmtmn© ©121212 ©n m�� '� mm�o�e�m�omm�omonm ©12121212 mn ®en,m,�� emmmmm® mmmm�mmm�n mmnnenmteemm © © ®�memennnnn © ©n ®n��'en�m��nmtmt m ®meee�� m ®mmmme ®e ®nonememnnnn ©n m��nt�nm� . memnmemn�nnnn�mnnnnnnnn mnno� ©�� onnn ©nnnnnnnn�onnnnnnnn��e�� ©nom mn�e ®n�e�n� ©��mnnnnnn ©n m��en� ®® mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnnn m�� CimLdaUon Rd mn ©mane ©ennn ©m,mnnnnnnon 'm��nn� emnnnmemm�nnntn tonnneeeae��ea ®�� me ®nme ®mm�en ©em ®12121212121212 mmtm,ene�� mnnnnnnnnnnnneonnnnnnnn m�� - memmmemm� © ®noemmmnnnnnn ' mn ®o�mnm� omee ®ooe�n�n ®mtoeen ©12121212 m ®�em�nee memmm ©amen ® ©�mtmeen ©12121212 �� ®ems® mmmm�mmm ®e ®n ®nt;moon ©neee mn�emmn�m K:1 01686- 3401Tmffic1Synchro120141PMSuild Alt 112014 PM BUILD ALT 1 MOEe TAB: ]MOEe] Pi 812912012 Sb,Tcafllc Simulation Summary 2117/2012 2014 PM BUILD ALT 2- Waakday M..-of EBecllveroaa .. . K\ 01686 - 340 1Tref6clSyncfiro120141PM1Build Alt 212014 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOEs TAB: jMOEsj 8292012 'mse.a eeemmmemen�eeeoenneen ®e ®e... m © ®memmn� ® © © ©mmn ©nnnn ©e 'mn,_�nenn� mmm © ®nmemn ® ®memononnn ©e m�� ©m�� 3: 69th Street & Southdate BE memeemmmeno ® ©mm © © ©nnn ©n m��nn�� ems® �m ®m�eenneoeneeeen0��le��n�0�s. m ©nenene ®mene�m ©e ®eee ©e ��ee��, !mmeemn ©mmm ® ®mnlmnnnnnnnn m��snnt�� . mnnnnnnnnnnnnm�mnnnnnnon m�� mnen ®nnn�n ©e ©mmnnneenea��e��n ®�� mnnmm�nm ®nnes�mnnennnee m��oe�e ®� �mmm�mn�nnn�nntmmn ©ooao ©n m��mm�� imm�n ®m�omnnn ©mjmmomeee ®m■ mm�� ®n.o�� !mememenm ©n�nnm,menm ® © ®�© mn�m ®m ®ant me�m�emm� ® ® ©e�memn ©nnnn mens�nte�m� mm ®mm ®� ®m ®e ® ®mmmmm © ©nn© mm�mm,��w� - 'm ®mmm ®emn ® © ©ont,monnnnnan ��nn_�� 'oen 'maeennnnnmememt�,mmnneoeem. © ®mmeenen ©ntmeneneene mmo��mtmt�� m��_�� mnnmm� ©e ®n ®nom,mnn ©oen0n m��onmo��m. - mmn © ©mnmonn © ©emnn ©000 ©n mno��_�a e ©e ©e ®e ©omen ©nto ©ennnnae o�n.�ann,�� men © ©enmmnn ® ®mmnnnnnnae mnn�� me ©man ©man ©m ®�mo ©onnn ®n jm�� mmm ©�m�o�n ®mntntmoe© ©nom m ©meme�� ommme ®mnm ©enneommmnnnn© oen,m�mn�m mmmmmmm��n ®n��meeennnnmo m�m�mn! ®�� m ® ®mmmnm�n ®mmmm © ©mnnnne '�m��mtm�o ®� . memnme�n�n�n ®mtmmnnnnnen mmne�n,�� mnn © ©nnnnnnes�enmm�nnnn e��mi�� ®�� mn�m ®n�e�n ® ®mt�mn ©neee ©e �_�� ®nee® mnnnnnnnnnnnnm,mnnnnnnnn meeeveeee Ild mn ©men ©mennnmtnemnmm�nnnn 'meeoee ©me emnnmm�nn ® ®n ®�I,�nnnnnnen.��!me® ®tee ®tea me ®nm� ®nemnn��,mennnnnne m 'eee ®ememeee mennnnnnnnnno��mnnonnnon ®�� 11: 111h Streat . memm�em�� ®�nntntmn ®onnnmo ' Imemoemeee omee ®nee ® ® ®e ®ntmeen ®nnems m ®ooao ®�� memmnnn ®m ®e ®��mmem ®nnm.e �� ®eee® mmmom�mn� ® ®nmmmeen© ©one mm ©e ®o ®tee K\ 01686 - 340 1Tref6clSyncfiro120141PM1Build Alt 212014 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOEs TAB: jMOEsj 8292012 slmrramc 61m ,flm summary 8/1712012 2020 PM NO BU= - Weekday Measures of Efkdl s K701666 -3401Tra16c1Srchm120301PMWo Build12030 PM NO BUILD MOEs TAB: PMOEs] 41�b 6292012 om�mem�eeeee ®mo ©eneeeae ememmmmmm mnemmnem ®eee ©mmnneeeeee �mmmmmm ®em mmeo�mnmm ®mnmmm © ©n000 ©e moo ®mommm . mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnneeeee mmmmmmmmm on�emnmm�nm ©ntmon© ©eee ©e �,emmm ©emmm mnnnnnnnnnnnem'mnnneeeee mmmmmmmmm mmm�mmm�mmm�ntmmn ©none ©e mmmmnmmmm. '�� mmmo ®mmm�mmn ©omnmmnonon . mmmmmommm Dome ®eme ®nnnemen ® © ®ia ©m■© e ® ®m ® ®�� me�m ®nmm ®mm�mmmmme ®nee m ®emmm ©mm mmmmm ®nmomo ® ®mmeomnnno© mmmmmmmmm mmenmmon ®onnommnonooeao mmmme ©�� om ® ®emmmm © ©n ®moon ©eee ©e emmmeemmm mnnnnnnnnnnnem;mnnnneeee mmmmmmmmm 'mnneonnmmnmnnnnnnnnn nn en emmnnn000 oo mmmmmmmmm m ©enmemn ©nen ®mm ©nnoee ©e mmmmoemmm mnnnnnnnnnmmnmmmmnnnnn mmmmmmmmm ommnnn0000mmmmmmmm n m . mnm ©mn ® ©mnm ®mmmmm�oneno , mmmmm ®�� e ®nmmmnmm ©nn ®moan ©eee ©e mmmmmmmmm mmen� ®one © ®n�mmnnnr�ne ®e m ® ®emmmmm mmmmmmm ® ®mnmmmme ©nnne ®e mmmmommmm mn�n ®m�nnomnommm ©nnoe ©e mnmemmmmm mnn © ©nneennnmtm'mnnmeen ®e emmmmmeem mn�n�n� ®mn ® ©�mlmnn ©eeeee mmmmem ©e® mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnneoeoo mmmmmmmmm Cftdl.. Rd mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnnoonm mmmmmmmmm onnnnnnnnnenemennneeeee��emmmmm mmm me ®n�e�mm�mneem ©nneeeae mama©©mmm mnnnnnnnnnnnomonnn00000 mmmmmmmmm mooemmm ©mm ®nmmmo ©nnoo ®e . mmmomeomm 000e��m�mm ©emoemnieneee em ®emee ©e m ©mm�mm ®n © ©semmmem ®ranee memmmm ©mm m ®gym ® ®mmm ©nnmmmmnm © ©n ©n mmmmmmmme K701666 -3401Tra16c1Srchm120301PMWo Build12030 PM NO BUILD MOEs TAB: PMOEs] 41�b 6292012 SImrrame BImWZdon Smmnary 811712012 2038 PM BUILD ALT 1 -Weekday Measm'es of EASCdven- K\ 01686 -3401Trafid *y hro120301PM\Build All 112030 PM BUILD ALT 1 MOE. TAB: [MOE.] 8/292012 mnmm ®nmmmo ®�o��n © ©oao ©e mnnmene000enommnn ©eao ©e m��mo� m®® m� ®m ®0e © ®mteeeneeeae'�e ©e��s�� mn ®m ©neeme ©n ©�mneseee ©e �� ®��e� m ®oomoemmo ®� ®�'�me ©000eee me ® ® ©e�� mnnnnnnnnnnnommn�ne0000 m�� oom00000mo ®o ®�mo ©0000 ©� m___ ®m___ mmmmomm�o ®e� ®�m000 © ©oo© �m�m��___ �memmeem ®mnnmm menno�ea�1� ��eo�� oe ® ©mmm ©e��mt�onneeoeee e��ee�� mnnnnamm�eneemmnnneeeee �� me © ©me�oono © ©mmne ®�o��o m��s ®ms��, - - e ©m ©m ©m ©e ®nn ®gym ©eneeeee11o�� ©e�� menn0nneeee��mmneneeeee �� mm� ©�o�o��me ®ammo© ®moos ®0�mm�� . �e�nm ®gin ® ®mnm�lmmennooee mmme�� n © ®nnneeeee�enn�ean�e�� ®ems mn�n�nn�nnnnoemnnnoeoe� ��a��s�� CLctdaUon Rd, m� ® ©nn ©eom�� men ®�onme m��so�mm� me ®nme ®nm ® ®n ®gym ®1111118888 m ® ®e ©�� I ommm�mea�m�a��,meme ©n�e� e�ee�emt�e m ®mm ®em ®� ®m0 ©mmmmm © ©nmmv i�mmem ®moo K\ 01686 -3401Trafid *y hro120301PM\Build All 112030 PM BUILD ALT 1 MOE. TAB: [MOE.] 8/292012 skarrar6c Bknuladon summery 811712012 2030 PM BUILD ALT 3 - Weekday Measures of EBecti —ess K 101666- 340 1Traffic\Synchro120301PMU3ulld Alt 212030 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOFs TAB: [MOEs[ 6292012 o mm�o�mm ®�o ® ©emm ©00000 ©o m�mmomo�o em® ee� ©�e� ® ©e�e�ennnene��memenmmmm momm�mm ®m © ®n��moonnnnmo �m ® ®mm�___ m�mmm�mmeoeoo��ee ©0000 ©e m___ ®e___ mmoom� ®om� ® ©��m ©o ©00000 m___em___ . mnnnnnnnnnnnommnnnennee m________ eee © ®mm��n ©e ©�oeeeeeoeeoom___ © ®___ mnn�mnnmmnnes�mnnennnee �_____ © ®_ momomomo�o�o�mmo ©0000 ©o m___ ©�___ oememe�m ©nn�em eee © ©©� © mmmmmmmmm, memm�emn� ®e ©smmeme ®name mmmmmmmmm mm ®mmm� ®gin © ® ®mmmemn ©om® ommmmmmmm, mmemmmnm� © © ®ommnnn000ao mmmmoemmm oem © ®��e�ee ®�oeeeeeeee mmmmmmmmm mnennnnnnnnnemmnnneeoee .mmmmmmmmm me ©omn ©e ®n ®eemmnn ©nnoee mmmmmmmmm ....men mmnm©mnmonn©©mmnn©ene ©e ' mmmmmmmmm e ©m ©mmmneeen ®tee ©eneeeae��mmmmsmmmm © ®enmeee® ®gym ©n ©neeae mn ©mmmmmm me ©moommon ® ® ©�mn ©nnno ©e 'mmmmmmmmm � mom ©�m�omn ®m��moo© ©Home 'm©eo©emmm emmme ®nmm ©e ©ememmm ©gene© mmmmmmmmm mmmm��mm�e ®nnt�meoe ©ranee mmme ®mmmm m ®mmm ®omen ©mmmem ©mnnn ©e mmmmmme ®m memnmo�n�nno ®�mmennoeeo mmmmmmmmm Dann ©nnnnnees�oenmeenn.e mmmmmm ©em mnnnnoonnnnnom'mnnnnnnoe mmmmmmmmm 10: S,uthda a East Exit & M-11 Cl—dation Rd mn ©eee ©emnnet��mnnmonnoo mmmmmmmmm omen�mnnn ®mn ®�eneeeeoee mm ©mmmmmm me ®n�� ®nemnnmmmenneenne m ®menemmm mnnnnnnnn0000moonnn0000 ommmmmmmm m ©��mee��mn��me ©ononoo ' me©ommomm mmmmmmmmm me�� ®� © ®e ®e © ®�mnem ©nmm� mmmm ®mmmm mm ©e ® ®m ©� ® ® ©m�oe ©ems ©eee mm ©e ®omme K 101666- 340 1Traffic\Synchro120301PMU3ulld Alt 212030 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOFs TAB: [MOEs[ 6292012 w snnT,aMe swnwuon smeary 71:712012 - - Etls0ng:012 Sat rday f eaw M ... w of EffMivamss .. . - K1 01686- 3401TmMclSynchro120121SNT12012 SAT_MOEs TAB: [MOEs] - 6292012 mmm�mmm ®��m ®�m'monneoo ©e m 'mmmmmmmmm ®mmmmmmm .!mnnnnannnnnnemmnnneeeee I 'mnnnnnnnnnonemmnnneoeee leee ®one ®�nesee,oe © ©eee ©��emmm ®mmmm mmmmmmmmm mnon000nonmo�mmonnooeao mmmmmmmmm mmoomm�mmo ®m ®mmmmm ©nnma mmmmmmmmm em�mm�mme ®e ®eeemmme © ©� ®= ee ®mmemmm mee�oem�mn ®© ©mmm ® ® ®ne ®� m ®mmm ® ®mm m ®m�m� © ®m�mo�m�m�mn ®eo0 mmmmm ®mmm mmnnmmnnm ©nom ®m.m ®nneOeaB�� mmmm ©ommm en ®eme�� ©�emene ©eeeee mmmmm ©mmm mnnnnnnnnne�emm�neeeeem, mmmmmmmmm mn�eonneenn ® ©men��eoeoe mmmmmmmmm . m�nnnnenn�eeem,m��neeeee mmmmmmmmm 'menneennnoon�mmoeneoeoo !mn�o ',mmmmmmmmm . _ ®nom ©gin ®� ©mi�mn ©moonoe mmmmmmmmm ®�nmm�nm ©ee�mmm ©nee ®� mmme ®mmmm mommmoo�m ©n0eememn��em ®��momm ®ommm . mm�o ®�� ©mo ® ®mmme ©eoeo ©e mm ®emmmmm e�nn0�ee0ne�� ®enneeeeee emmmmmm ®m �� ®�e��ame ®m�n�eeeeee mmmmm ®me® mnnnnnnneneoomm�noeoeoo mmmmmmmmm mn��nnn�nno�ommon�eeeee (mmmmmmmmm onnnn�e0nne�em,ennneeeemt emmmmmmmm m��emm�e�neno�,m ©naeeeBa mmmmmmmmm m�nn��nn��ono�m0nnooeoo mmmmmmmmm ©m�� ®�e� ®o�m�mo ® ©nnomo mmmmmmmmm e ©a ®tee ©ems ®e ®ewe ®eoeee�m��emmemmmmm mem�m�e ®wee® ®gym ®gin ©ee ®® ® ©mmme ® ®® m�em ©mmm ®m ©ne ©m�em © ©ee�e m ®memmmmm K1 01686- 3401TmMclSynchro120121SNT12012 SAT_MOEs TAB: [MOEs] - 6292012 SO,Tr,Mc SYriulad,n suoaaary 9117/201 2014 SAT NO BUILD Measures,f EIT-11 ae,a K1 016W340 \Traf9c\Synchro120141SATWo BuIId12014 SAT NO BUILD MOEs TAB: [MOEs] Al' �- 6292012 mmmee ®emm ©nn ©mme ®m ©nn ©n m�� ®�� mnmmonmomn ©�e�mn © ©000 ©n��mmmmammmm mnnmmnnmonnnn�,mnn ©nee ©e m��mo� oe ®een ®menennteonenennan a ©�� mn ©een ©eenn ® ®mmnnneneen 'm��n ©� meoeemeem ®nn ©emen000eeo emmmmmmmm - • mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnone m�� one ©nmm�ennn ©Wren © ©nne ©n emmmmmmmm) mnnnnnnnnnnnnmlmnnneenne m�� mnenemm�mn ®n ®mmn ©noon ©e m��mm��, m ®oommmem © © ©ommoom ©en ©n mmmmmmmmm o© mmeemeenn ®nmem ®e © © ©n ©��enmmmmmmm me ®mmemmmnmenmmmme ©nenn mnnmmmnmm meemmmemmmm� ©mmmm © ©eo© mmmm ®mmmm me ©nem ©nennnem,mnnneenae m��e ®�� o ® ®emn ®mmn ©© ®;one ©ennnn emmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnneeenn mmmmmmmmm mnneonnmmnnnnt�mnnn00000 mmmmmmmmm . meenemmn ©nennmm© ©ranee ©n mmmmmmmmm onm ©mmm�mmm�nmonnnennnn emmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnneennn m�� mnnnnnoonnnnemmnnn00000 m�� ' mn�o�n ®e ®mm�m�mnomoonoo - mmmmmmmmm emnmmmnmm�ne m ®ene ®mnmenn ©moenn ®�menn ©ee ©nenn��m ®n emm�mm ©mm ® ®e ®mmmm mmem ©mmmm ©nmmme ©en ©0000 omm�om�� I� mm�© ®mmem ©n ©ntmmme ©nee ©e mmmmmmmmm 'emmmmme onnmmnnnnnnnntnloenneeeee�� ®m mnmm�nm ® ®n ®e ®�mneneeeen mmmmem ©n® mnnnnnnnnnnnnm',mnnnneenn m�� CL—"llm Rd mnnnnnnnnnnnommnone0000 m�� onnnnnnnnnnne�ennneennn emmmmmmmm mmmnmemnmmnnnmm ©nneee ©n mm ®m ©mmmm mnnnonnnnnnnommnnn000no m�� momm�emm� ©eent�lmem ©nno ®e ',mmmmmmmmm .moos omenmee ®mnm ©nt�me © © ©nnnn m ®mmmemmm memememmm�m © ®�mee ® ©nn�n me ®mem ©mn mmmmmmmmmonnemmne © ©no ©e ® ®mmm K1 016W340 \Traf9c\Synchro120141SATWo BuIId12014 SAT NO BUILD MOEs TAB: [MOEs] Al' �- 6292012 SbnTmfIlc 6bnulalion Summary IV172012 2014 SAT BUILD ALT - MeasuresofERMlverefa - K10168G 340 1TraficlSynchro120141SAT1Bulld All 112014 SAT BUILD ALT 1 WES TAB: IMOEs] hiss 8292012 'mnnmmnnnnnn © ©m mnn ©nnoanv1� m��nn� oenmenn ®m ©n © ©mmeeeeeea0 me ®�� ©a�� mnnn ®ne�nneentm,mnn ©seea0 ��_��n ®� mmenmm ®nn ® ®nemjmm ©nnnnae mn�nan�� mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnneeno m�nt��n,�� eee ©nenemnn ®omen ©eeee ®ns��le�� mnnnnnnnnnn ® ®omnn ©eee ©e mv��e ©� mnenon�mm�nnn��mn ©nnnn ©e o�� ®�� mm� ©�n�o�ooen ®moonnnnno�� mmm�om�� e ©mnmememne ®em ©nn © © © ©n© a ©mm�� ®��, mnme� ©mm� ®� © ®ntmmm�eee ®� m ©nm�� ®e�i memmmmmmm�oenntmnm © ©nnn© 'on�n 'm��snn�en ®��'� moenaen ®mn ©nnm'mnnnnno ®e oe�ene�em ® ®n ®� a ®m ©nneee" e��nvnt�� mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnneeeee ��a�� mn ® ®nnn ®mn ®nammnn ®eenn0 m�oonn�ont . 'mnnnnnn ®mnn ®e�mnn ©nnn ®e mnn_��a mmm�memennen ®ntm ©nneeeae�1m��e ®�� m ®nnnnnee�n© ®gym ®nene� ©e mem.��_�� mn ©monmmmn ©m ®�mn ©nnnn ©e m�� mmmeme�o� ®nnnntmnmmnnonn mn ®om�� emnmemnn ®nn ®nteoen� © ©nn © emm�t��mm�, mmnmemmamn ®® ®moo ©nnnnnno m�s� 'gym ®mn ®� memnme�n� ®gin ®�mmn ©nee ®e ®nenen�� °n• mn�m� ��n�e ®gym-` e�n°ee°eee1�'m��e��e�� mnnnnnnnnnnnnm mnnnnnnno mnn ®en © ®mn ®n ©m,mnnneenoo �,m��n,��nn® emnnmenn�nnnnt�mennneeen• �,� ®� ®ten, ®tea mmnmm�nn�nnn ©mmnnnnne ©� ��mnm��nt mnnnnnnnnnnnn�mnnnnnnnns � ®nt ®_ ®�_ ®_ ®_� mmmmom ®mmn ® ®o�lmoo© ©Henn K10168G 340 1TraficlSynchro120141SAT1Bulld All 112014 SAT BUILD ALT 1 WES TAB: IMOEs] hiss 8292012 SlmTraf a Simulation Summary 8110/2012 2014 8AT BUILD ALT 2 Measures of E6ecUVenesu K% 01686- 340kTraffic\Synchm%2014kSAnBuild At 212014 SAT BUILD ALT 2 WES TAB: [MOEsj Aft� 6/29/2012 ' eem® 'mmmmmmm memmm © ®ne�.m ©n ©eeeae��m��em�� ®me ©emtemeeeeee ©e m��em,mm� mm� ©�mnmm ©n © ©m,m00000eao m��mm�� 3: 69th Sired & Southdale SE meoemo ©mmn © ©omm ©© ©eee ©e im��mm�� oemmmemn� ® ©e ®moemeenen■e��e��e�� 'mmme ©mmeen ©eomimen ©eeeae m��mm�� .. . mnnnnnnnnnnnommnnnooeoe m�� eee© mnmeennnntmenneeeeee��e...em... menmmnnmmnnnemmnnmeee�e m��e ©� omm�mo�nmoonom,mo ©0000 ©e m�� ®m�� 'mm� ©�m�m ®mm�mmmeemeee ®e mm�mom�� memmm ©mm�eee ®mmmme ©nem•e m ® ®�e�e�m memmmmmm�oo ® ©mm ©nm © ©omo mm�mm.m�� memmemem ® © ©neomennoeoae m��oe�eo 'm 'meennnnnnnnnemmeeneeeee ©mem ©�mm ® ©ne�onneeeeee e��oe�� m�� mnee ®nemnne ®emimnn ©00000 m��m ©�� mmneonnemnnnmtmmen ©eee ©e mmn.�� 'me ©m000mmnon ©men ©moue ©e m�� ., ... mm�omm� ©mnmm ©mmmoo ©noon memo ©m�� mmmmemmm® eem ©meeem © ©n ®e��m ®mm ®n.m.mm mmem� ®m ®tee ®nemmnee ©ranee mm�e ® ®�� mmmmemmmm �,mem ®onommmmnnn000 m�� ®�e�� . , .: ©gin ®ram ® ©nommm© ©nee ©e mmme�� ennmmenmmne © ©�mnnneeeoe��'e��n, ®� me�mnn�m�nenmtm,mn ©neee ©e 'm�� ®ae® mnnnnnnnnnnnom�mnnneoeoo m�� II'� mn © ©mn ©mmneoo�lmnne000 ©e ' m��mm� immnnmmnnmeee ©m,mnnneeeee e�m�� mmmnmmmemeene�menneeen•e m ®�me�� 'mnnnnnoonnnnom'monn00000 m�� . .. ' moos ®mom ®me�m ®mmme ©neomo momom,mo�� e�oee ®oe� ©gin ®eee ® © ©neee lemmmm. ®�� memmmmemm ©en ©mrmeemeee ®e �e�� ®gin. 'mmmmom ®mo ®m ®mm!mee © ©ne ®e mmoo ®e�� K% 01686- 340kTraffic\Synchm%2014kSAnBuild At 212014 SAT BUILD ALT 2 WES TAB: [MOEsj Aft� 6/29/2012 ShnTranic ShOaUm Summary Avera SMasMran Traffic OUeueln feel Sby 811812012 zec0on 2030 SAT NO BUILD Left-TUm TMOUgh RIgN -TUm ' Me-S of ERecll -s ... . . . Appr LOS Ave Queue Max' Oueua Sforeg a Ave Queue Max Queue Ave Queue Max Queue Slorege K1 01686 - 340 \Tralfic\Synchro\2030\SAT\No BuiId12030 SAT NO BUILD MOEs TAB: [MOEs) 8292012 Avera SMasMran Traffic OUeueln feel Sby ®® zec0on Left-TUm TMOUgh RIgN -TUm ' WM) Appr LOS Ave Queue Max' Oueua Sforeg a Ave Queue Max Queue Ave Queue Max Queue Slorege K1 01686 - 340 \Tralfic\Synchro\2030\SAT\No BuiId12030 SAT NO BUILD MOEs TAB: [MOEs) 8292012 ® ® ®® oe� ®me ®mm © ®emeone ®wee ©� ee�ms�s�� mnommnneonn ® ®� mnne00000 m��ee� oe�e�ee�e ®m ©mmoeneeeeae a ©m�� me ®men ©e�eeoemman��eee �� ®e_ mme�m�� ©m ®m ©m�mn ©neeeeo � ®gym ©ms�� . mnonnennnnnoom,mn�ee0000 m�� meneenen�nnnemmnneee0ee m�� m�0000�o�0000�',mn ©0000 ©e o��mm_�� m ®e ®gym ©� ®e ®oammem ® ©en ®e 'mmmm ®�� o ® ®me ©mee ® © ®�eoemn © © ©e© eemm ®m ®�� memm� ®mmm ®en ©�mnom © ©oo© mm�m�m�� ©eam ©na ©nom ®mm ®nneooao m�� ®e�� nnnnnn�nnn�ammnnaeeeee m��a�� mn��onneonn ® ®��mnneeeoo� m�oo� ®o�v me��eem�mn ®n ®�Im © ©n��e ®e m�a®eeoa� mnm ©mn� ©�nnnommnnneeeee m��e� Im_�� m�on�onnnn000mmn0000�o� omnmmmn�® ®nom ®mmenn ©eee� oe�e��e�� mm�n��eemem�m�,�eme ©nee m ® ®e��s�� mm�em ® ®n�m�om�mme ©nee ©e mm ®ee ®�� anem�nnnenn� ®�ee�eeeeee e��e ®� mennnno�nn000mmooneeeo� m�� ®�� m��naone�monnee000 '�e��a�a m��e�� oe��e��ane0e�enneeeee� ®�� m ®mna�mn�een ®mm ©nneeeae m��ee�� mm ®e�m�a ®moo ® ®��om ®new ®e � ®moo ®ea ®� m ®ane ®emennn�ntmoo® ©ranee �eoo ®o�� K1 01686 - 340 \Tralfic\Synchro\2030\SAT\No BuiId12030 SAT NO BUILD MOEs TAB: [MOEs) 8292012 SbnTref c emaaallon sunaaary W19/2012 2020 SAT BUM ALT 1 Measures of EBecti- - �un©mun©®n ® ® 'I , - ® ©®©lan©uum®® ®® memmmmm ®mnn ®n�oe ©ennn ©e mnnman�� mmnmmm ®mme ®n ®mme ©nn ©nee m��nntnmm mnommnmmmnm © ®m�,mn ©ennn ©e m��am�� menmmnnmmnn © ®m�mnnnnnn ©e 'im��ne� memmmm ® ®m ® ®mneoeennnnan ee ®�� mnn © ®nnennnnnt�mnnennnen '�� ® ©� mmeemmommn�nemmm ©nnnn ©e m ®�men�� mnnnnnnnnnonommnnnnnnoo m�� ens mnnmmnnnnnnee�mnnennnan ©ensmm�nnnmen ©eeee ©n e��n�� m�� ©�� ononomm�mn�n�mmo ©onnn ©n m��m�� m ®e ©�mem ®mme ®ntmeem ©onoo mm�mom��, o ©mmmm ®mennnnteoeeennne® enem�m�� m ©ems ®oo�e� ® ®mteemennnnn �n ®��enmm memmomommo ©entmeeme ® ©oo© om�m ®m�� meemeeemmnn ® ©emnonnnnan m��nn�� e © ®emnmm ®nom ® ®mtommnnnnnn��e��n�� mnnnnnnnnnnnn�ennnnnnnn m�� mn ©eons © ©no © ©mmnnennnee m�� ©n�� mmneennmonnnommnnennn ©e mee�� oemnmemmm��nntmto mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnnn ©nnnnnan o��a ©�� m�� mn ©men ©monnnommn ©onnn ©e m�� mm�o�o� ©� ©�m�mmmmo ©name �meo�n,�� ememememee ©nneem ®ennnn© en��en�m mmmmomomm © ©emmmmomnnn ©e m��mmnm� '� mmmn�em © ®n © ®mtmtmmnnnnnoe !moee�� mnnnnnnmm�nnem ®� mn�m�n� ® ®nneem,mn ,ennneenee��e��e ®none ®n m��nen�® mnnnnnnnnnnnommennnnnnn m�� 10: S,uthdala Fast Exit & Wit Cimtdation Rd mne ©enno ©nnnam,mnmm�nnne m��nn� mmnnm ©enm ®nn ®�oennnnnan e� ©�� m ®mnm ® ®mm�nn�mm ©nnnnn ©n m� ®en�� mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnnnnnno Im�� mmmm ®mmm� © ®n ®mt,moo ©Hones mm�omtmo�� m ©memnmmmnnn ®��,mnn ®nnnnn m ©��m ®gin m® omom ©mm © ©nommnm © ©n000��momom ©�� K101686- 3401Trefi.kSynchro120301SATBuild Alt 1\2030 SAT BUILD ALT 1 MOES TAB: [MOE.) AI&(A 8282012 K:1 01686- 340%TmMckSynchrok2030 \SA- RBuild Alt 212030 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOEs TAB: [MOEs] 81292012 memmmommmnno ®m,mm�nnnn ®® 'mn��nma�� 'm�� ®n��o oil m��00�m00n ® © ©�'m ©nneenn m�i�nnn�m mme ©�m�Om ®nom ©�mnOnnnnOn D��inmO�� 'm��snn�� m0�0�� ®mm ®enn�m © ® ©nnnOn mmmo ©me ®mnnnntemnonnnnoo m��nm�� . mna�nnnmen0nom ane ©e�mn�nnmenten ,mnnee0000��m�_�� ® ©nne ©e e�� ®�� imnnmmnmm�nnnnmmnnmeenne m��nn� mmm�mmm�mn ..mme ®n ®mmnnnnnnon Im��n�� ®�mm� ® ®n ®n�mee ® ®nnnn mmntmme�� o ®mmme ®mm ®en ®mommen © ©n© en ®� ®�� m ©em�eme� ®� ® ®�mnme ®nn�n � ®entnt ® ®�� meemm ® ©mmnnn ®�mem ® © ®nn® mm�mn�� _ mmmmo ®em ®en ®nmmmnnnnnan m_��en�� o®® Bm�mBm ®n ®n�oeneennee�1'e ®�� mnnnnnnnnnnnn�mnnneenne ��e��a�� mn ®e ®n ©mm� ® ®om'mnn ®nnnon 'e�sann ®�_ mmneomnmmnn ® ®�mnn ®nnn ©n 'mn ®e�� oem© meenm ®n�e�o ®neeeem.e��e��o ©no�� mnnnnnnnnnnna�mnnnnnnne m�� mnomnnomonnnnmmn ®nnnn ©� m�� ®�� mm�e�m�omn ®n��mme © ©nnn� Imm�mme�� ommmmmmmm ©nnnmimm ®m © ©e ©� me�m��m mmemememm ©n ®��,eemmn�nnn o�oo ®�em� mom ©�e�n ® ® ®n ®�,mmn ©nnnn Denmm�ne ®ne ® ®m;Onn ©no HER 0�� ® ®� me�m��m�nn ©n�meeneoeae ��nan, ©e® mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnnn 10: S,d1hdatEaxf Exit& Wit Win® ®ono ® ©n ® ® ®mmnnnnnnnn m =s® =®nnm, omnemm ®nms�nn�oennnena� ea ®®��e m ©mne ®mnmm ®n ®� ®ennnnn ®n m��en�o�� mnnnmm�nnnnno�mnnnnnnon m��s�e� !mmmm ®o © ®mnn ® ®�',mee ©nnnnn mn�o ®ea ®� m ©memmeme ©n ® ©�,mnn ® ©nnen �em��n�n m ®mme ®amo ® ®nnnomoo ® ©nn ®mm annam�o�nt K:1 01686- 340%TmMckSynchrok2030 \SA- RBuild Alt 212030 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOEs TAB: [MOEs] 81292012 r i� � w9lN/~�l� ok �' - A o• RESOLUTION NO. 2000-123 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONCORDIA PROPERTIES LLC, SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER THEATER AND RESTAURANT/RETAIL EXPANSION City of )'A1,10 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development plan dated October 18, 2000, for Concordia Properties, LLC, Southdale Shopping Center Theater and Restaurant/Retail Expansion presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on November 21, 2000, be and is hereby approved. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 215t day of November 2000. ""-o City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk_ for the Cify o >.n id,&- ereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution as du adopted by t ie 'na City Coin ' at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2000, a)76 as recorded in the Minutes of sa -1 Regular Mrcfing. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City � 5o() 00 ..day of V_ )PCP b'VI�PI" —_ 2. City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 1TO TDD (952) 826 -0379 Minute s r City CouncilMovember 21; 2000 Conference and Section Championship. Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Kelly introducing the following resolution and moving its approval• RESOLUTION NO, 2060-118. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 2000 BOYS' SOCCER TEAM WHEREAS, the members- of the Edina High School 2000 Boys' Soccer were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section Champions and. State Ch ns; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team ause of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coache d WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the mbers of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good ortsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Ci ouncil that congr 'ons be extended to the members of the Team: Sam Awsumb Andy Witchger Benjamin on Jonathan Lewis Patrick Cronan Nicola orns Erik Nichols Alexander Darb Pet rgensen Terence O'Connell Robert Gueli Lund Daniel Roddy Philip Jo n thong Ruben Jeffrey Shideman Perek L quist Aaron Witchger Jeffrey Strickland Eric S ver David Jenson, Coach Tommy Weber Ch York Bill Garner, Asst. Coach BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED at this resoluti be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies a given to memb of the Team. ADOPTED this 21st day o ovember, 2000. Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetz Resolution adopted. -"uNuxna Ur trio UULAK 1V1LISUNUb UK NUVEMBER 6 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Member H land and seconded by Member Kelly approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 6; 2000, approved. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONCORDIA PROPERTIES L.L.C. APPROVED (SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained the owners of Southdale have submitted a request for Final Development PIan approval to allow the construction of an addition to the center containing a floor area of 120,007 square feet. The addition would house a 16- screen theater and two new restaurants. The theater would have a seating capacity of 3,959. The proposed addition would increase the total floor area of the center from 1,248,517 to 1,368,524 square feet: The additions would be located adjacent to the southwest corner of the center in an area now used for parking and for transit operations. The additions would result in a reduction of the total on-site parking from the current 7,104 spaces to 6,686 spaces. Page 3 4(5-� Minutes/Edina City Council/November 2i, 2000 Scott Pollack, Aerostreek project architect, gave a presentation using graphics of the proposed expansion. Mr. Pollack noted the expansion is proposed for the southwest corner of the site with the theater being placed between the existing truck tunnel and the existing parking deck. The ring road will be moved further out to maximize the parking inside of the ring road. that would be more comfortable to the customers. Mr. Pollack explained there are two parking fields' one east and one west of the expansion, both at different levels. From the lower parking field, there will be two entrances, the lobby entrance into the movie theater. He added patrons would be able to purchase tickets inside the theater. Next to this would be a separate entrance repIacing the existing mall entrance. This entrance would allow customers to pass through the theater and into the mall. Mr. Pollack explained that the two restaurants with outside entries would have their own identities on the outside of the mall. Mr. Pollack explained that there is an underutilized common area of approximately 20,000 feet that will be converted into tenant space with the improvement He said that there is a synergy existing between theaters and restaurants so placing them in dose proximity is important On the restaurant side of the addition, there would be entrances into the restaurants, individual retail tenants, and two mall entrances one with an escalator down to the theater. Mayor Maetzold asked how people get from the main core of the shopping center to the bus terminal. Mr. Pollack said from the lower level, people would walk through an arcade and out through the movie theater. From the upper level, they would walk along the length of the theater to the bus shelter. Member Hovland asked if it was correct that in order to reach the bus shelter persons would walk outside, and if this would be different from the present situation, where they walk out directly from the mall to a covered bus shelter. Mr. Pollack acknowledged that there is a longer distance than exists today. Member Hovland asked if there was any plan to allow access to the bus shelter through the back area of the theater or on the west side. Mr. Pollack explained that was actually the truck tunnel and would be unsafe. Member Hovland asked how far a person would have to walk to reach the shelter. Mr. Pollack replied approximately 250 feet Member Kelly asked to address the developer. Richard Taylor, the O'Connor Group, one of the general partners who own the property said he serves as the asset manager responsible for Southdale. Member Kelly said it appears the proposal is almost as if an outlot was proposed for development: While he would be willing to give up the 700 parking spaces, he needs to be convinced that it will increase traffic flow in the center and allow areas of .Southdale that have been under - performing (Mervyn to Penneys and Penneys to Dayton) to grow their traff ic. He warned that he could not support any further reductions in parking in the future after this addition. He asked how the proposed addition would increase the traffic to the Mervyns' and Pennies' corridors. Mr. Taylor responded that looking at sales per square foot, Southdale is in the top ten of the national regional malls. Penney's Court has 59,000 square feet that is about 50% occupied under permanent leases. Mervyn' Court on the lower level has about 30,000 square feet, which is about 40 % occupied. As the owner analyzed the issues of the property, they looked at these two underutilized areas plus the third level food court, which had not performed as hoped. The owners attempted to find a theater operator who would put a two or three level theater into the Penneys' Court and were unsuccessful. Theater owners said their operations need to be a single Ievel entity and the proposed location is the only one available. He added Page 5 A 1s). f 1 1 Minutes/Edina CBY Council/Noyember 21, 2000 Public.Comment David Farrier, 4612 Casco Avenue, asked if there had been any consideration of moving the mass transit location to an entirely different area from either its existing or proposed locations. Council Discussion /Action Member Kelly said he has spoken with many of the development team. He stated that his major concern is that the expansion is being. sought to increase the mall's market value allowing Southdale to be flipped without looking to the long -term needs of the area. Member Kelly said he originally thought the . expansion, would . be located nearer to J. C. Penney's and that the restaurants would be decentralized. He added that in his opinion, the development of virtually an outlot does nothing to improve traffic. Member Kelly stated further that the expansion solves a secondary problem at the cost of 700 parking spaces. He stated that future development cannot come at the cost of more parking. Member Kelly asked this be made a condition of approval for the current proposal Member Hovland said he did not share all the concerns of Member Kelly. He acknowledged that having a theater anchoring a mall was a new concept, adding that he understood the synergy existing between theaters and restaurants. Member Hovland recognized the hard work of the development team, thanking them for the presentation. Member Hovland said he was all right with the reduction in the parking, but was very concerned about affecting mass transit. He requested that the development approval be conditioned upon further design and approval of the transit hub and access to the bus shelter. Mass transit and bus ridership should be encouraged. Mayor Maetzold noted that he wished the changes were completed on France Avenue. However, he staged he liked the theater concept. Mayor Maetzold voiced concern about the east side of the property. He added he thought the developers had done a good job with traffic flow and parking, however, he shares Member Hovland's concern for the transit hub and does not want to see any negative impact on bus ridership. Mayor Maetzold does not want to see bus riders walking 280 feet outside to get to a bus shelter agreeing that a condition of approval should be further review of the mass transit portion of the project. Member Kelly questioned how many liquor licenses are still available in Edina. Mr. Hughes replied that eleven licenses are still available. Member Kelly expressed concern that the restaurants developed be of a caliber that would improve the mall. Gary Colliard responded that while his firm is the theater developer, it is also a mixed -use land developer. They will be in the center for twenty years and have a fiduciary responsibility to make sure any restaurants are a good fit and that everyone's goal was to improve the traffic and viability of the Southdale Center. Member Hovland made a motion to close the public_ hearing. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried Member Kelly made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2000 -123 granting final development plan approval conditioned upon: 1) location and design of transit hub must be approved by City Staff; 2) an easement allowing City transit vehicles the right to cross Center property; 3) a Page 7 IKr Cary Teague From: Tom Jenson Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 4:01 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Southdale Apartments Hi Cary, Here are my comments for the Southdale Apartments. 1. They are showing only one water supply to the property. More explanation is needed on how the fire sprinkler protection is going to work for 3 buildings and the parking levels. 2. I'm recommending separate water supplies coming from the new water main installed on the property to each building. The water supply for the 4 story apartment /townhouse should also supply the underground parking. 3. I'm recommending fire department connections (FDC) for each building. a. 10 story building located at the south end. b. 6 story building located at the south east corner. c. 4 story and parking garage located at the west exterior entrance to the stairway. 4. Fire hydrants shall be located on the inside of the road around the buildings so connecting to them does not obstruct fire department vehicles. a. One shall be located near the southeast corner of the 6 story building. b. One shall be located at the west exterior entrance to the stairway of the 4 story building. c. The one shown on C4.1 on the north end of the property can remain as shown. 5. Fire lane signs will be required along the access road to the buildings. I will put a copy of this with my plan set with notes on it. Thanks, ` Thomas Jenson, Fire Marshal 952 - 826 -0337 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0393 TJenson0Ed1naMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Fire Ais1 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: September 7, 2012 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Review of Planning Submittal for Southdale Housing Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O It appears that all storm water is treated on -site; provide all storm water calculations that indicate this. O A developer's agreement will be required for the revisions to 69th Street West — pedestrian crossing at easterly entrance and the westerly entrance into Southdale to include an eastbound left turn lane. Other items that need to be included are the public sidewalks along York Avenue and also along 69th Street West, and the intersection improvements at York Avenue and the entrance into Cub Foods. O All improvements along West 69th Street will need to meet Municipal State Aid standards and along York Avenue will need to meet County State Aid standards. O Provide sidewalk easement over all public sidewalks along York Avenue and 69th Street West. O Provide better pedestrian walkway between project and Southdale Center. Sheet C2.1 Site Plan: • Provide plans for the westerly entrance on 69th Street West into Southdale Center to include an eastbound left turn bay. • Provide plans for an enhanced pedestrian crossing through the median island between the easterly entrance of Southdale Center and Galleria to the south. The Promenade Crossing at Hazelton Road should be the template for the design of this pedestrian crossing. • Provide a "No U- Turn" sign in the westbound 69th Street West left turn bay at the Galleria entrance. This will prevent vehicles from exiting the right -out exit at the apartments and weaving across two through lanes to then go east bound on 69th Street West; the route to go eastbound would be to use the internal roadway system of Southdale Center to access York Avenue. • Provide an updated intersection detail for the intersection improvements at York Avenue and the entrance into Southdale / Cub Foods. The intersection improvements should include enhanced pedestrian crossings similar to what is being proposed on France Avenue at 66th Street West, 70th Street West, or 76th Street West. Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 /+I& 5~ MEMO - t�\J'� o e' i a • Eliminate boardwalk on sidewalk along York Avenue. The sidewalks along York Avenue and 691h Street West will become public sidewalks where the City will be maintaining these sidewalks. Provide 8 -ft wide sidewalks with a minimum of 8 -ft wide boulevards in these locations. • The attached turning radius indicates that an ambulance can maneuver through the turn - around. Sheet C4.1 Utility Plan: • Staff has analyzed both public utility systems to be certain that this development will not burden the public system. Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) reviewed the existing water main system. SEH determined through the water main computer model that the existing water main has capacity to provide water service, irrigation, and fire flow protection to the 232 units while still maintaining the same level of protection to the City. Barr Engineering (BARR) reviewed the existing sanitary sewer system. The additional sanitary flow generated from the proposed 232 unit development was incorporated into the sanitary sewer model. BARR determined that there is sufficient capacity in the existing sanitary sewer lines to accommodate the proposed development. • There is a note below the Utility Notes that states the developer is analyzing a "Living Machine Sanitary Sewer System" in lieu of connecting into the sanitary sewer system. Staff does not recommend that this system be approved until staff can be reassured that the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services along with the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency approve such treatment. • Indicate on plan that all utilities shown are "Private ". Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. G: \PW \ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \S Streets \Southdale Center \2012 Apartments \20120906 WH -Edina Review Southdale Housing.doc /Y SC Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 22.74 UJ 4.59 12.47 B-AUTO feet Width .7.71 Track 7.71 Lock to Lock Time 6.0 Steering Angle 47.8 AMBULANCE DETAIL -r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I, N BKV G R 0 U P Architectm Interior Design landscape Architecture Engineering Be-- vosell Group Inc 222 North second Street Minneapolis MIN SWI Telephone, 6:2-339-3752. Faaanul. 612- 339 -6212 —I6 kv g ro u p. com I(irnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2..= Southdale Housing nr VEHICLE MANEUVERS AMBULANCE Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Southdale - Proposed Transit Traffic Circulation - 2012 �'" Mr�+1•d� • t sew* •f e a � - . � � ; - e • e , s. �. R.. ors+ a s'e � � � •..lw N*w-. ! r = w • • ... ' r- 4 T--77 .► lllla lJ \JLYIlI �JIQ. - . _ ti t P.,.. ..+r.�„k a!A1w�' - � xs. re ! It R r - FIRESTONE _ nor► � ,. westbound . e New 4r ` CS Transit t� t ' - .�, Center <` CY-S I I A VVV - F� C PENNEY �• r+ X": OUTHDAL `, `�1ERBERGERS TH +HE.- vp ° -f.. = 40ld Park &Ride IV • _ 1Afn l�lL4II1 � * '� � = a � s • � a i � � - , � . - !jbW r s • . —s .t -a �, LEGEND: = Bus Flows - O `` {t , ' i New Platforms I O 125 250 500 Feet I * r Map By J. D Ifery �`�` ° Metra Transit Service Development 6129112 �i P °' " "' Council Q MetrOTransit �RkF� EXISTING DRIYE LANE �S^FN.. I E PLAT /ORM D • DEIVER EA CILITY COLORED PARR R RIDE LAYOVER CONCRETE PLATFORM SPACE _J 7 PARKING RAMP �FN7 MNARCE -- PLATFORM R P , n � • � ,tA I � K ® + Transit Center Site Plan 410 /I•' iE SITE KEY PLAN l "7 / / / �N HAY DOBBS SK. 5 A Paw IS e; iAL-Ar Jim r �� I1 i �• I I Ali z - Transit Center Illustrative Perspective J DATE: 26 Wk. 2012 PROJECT NO.: 10012.005 Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Center 7m Edina. Minnesota' 6 WO ?LIT x r6o Transit Center Illustrative Perspective VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST DATE: 22 November, 2011 PROJECT NO.: 10017.005 Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Center Edina. Minnesota A { V i I cr, LNN SK. 7 HAY DOBBS PROACT NO.: IN1I MS ;11 f, Transit Center Illustrative Perspective VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST Metro Transit - Southdate Transit Center Ali, ,� HAY DOBBS SK. 8 SIGNAGE STRUCTURE B SEATING (@RICK TO MATCH ORIGINAL SOUTHDALE COLOR) © BUTTE lY ROOF .� TRA .iH ELTER : �.. Rw 01 r. I Park & Ride Platform /Layover SIGNAGE STRUCTURE B SEATING IBRICK TO MATCH ORIGINAL SOUTHOALE COLOR) BUTTERFLY ROOF Q: TRANSIT SHELTER i BRIER TO MATCH ;ORIGINAL VTTLE COLOR Driver Facility Transit Center West Elevation BRICK TO MATCH ORIGINAL SOVTHDALE COLOR SIGNAGE B SEATING (ALIGN RICK T TD MA MATH ORIGINAL SO UtN DALE COLOR] BUTTERFLY ROOF TRANS T SHELTER Platform B Shelter STORMWATER DID- DASINS I TY PICAL) Platform A Shelter Storm water Bio Basin (Typ) Driver Facility Transit Center East Elevation DATE: 23 Now,bcr, 1011 PROJECT NO.: 10013.005 Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Center A16 SIGNAGE STRUCTURE R SEATING (BRICK TO MATCH ORIGINAL SOU THDALE COLOR) KT Park & Ride Platform /Layover HAY DOBBS SK. 9 O e k �y �RPOB Toc MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.E. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING'— Rezoning From PSR -4 To PUD and Amending Subsection 850 Establishing The PUD -2 Zoning District For 3420 Heritage Drive, Erik's Ranch, Ordinance No. 2012 -21 Action Requested: Waive the second reading and adopt the attached Ordinance approving the establishment of a PUD Zoning District on this site. Information / Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — January 15, 2013) Erik's Ranch and Retreats is requesting a rezoning of 3420 Heritage Drive from PSR-4, Planned Senior Residential to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the purpose of allowing adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) within the existing building. There are no exterior changes proposed to the site or building. The request is simply to allow adults with ASD to live within this building. The interior of the building would be remodeled. The existing building contains 59 units; 35 of those units would be used for long -term residents with ASD. The remaining 24 units would short term stays. Roger Knutson, the city attorney, has advised staff that the City could face liability for rejecting a rental application from an individual with a disability who does not meet the minimum age requirement for City housing. The attorney has recommended two options. One, rezone the site to PUD to allow the current use plus adults with ASD or two, amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow adults with disabilities or ASD within all PSR -4 Zoning District. Staff and the applicant are recommending a rezoning to PUD, rather than opening up the use City wide within all PSR -4 Districts. To accommodate this proposal, the following is requested: ➢ Preliminary and Final Rezoning from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ A Zoning Ordinance Amendment that establishes the PUD, Zoning District. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 12, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Rezoning and Zoning Ordinance Amendment as written subject to the findings in the Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission suggested that they should further study this issue as part of their on -going consideration of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance No. 2012 -21 • Minutes from the November 14, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, November 14, 2012 ORDINANCE NO. 2012-21. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 3420 HERITAGE DRIVE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 2. Planned Unit Development District -2 (PUD -2) — Erik's Ranch A. Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Rembrandt Manor, Hennepin County„ Minnesota. B. Principal Uses; (Buildings containing four or more dwellings units which are senior citizen dwelling units or dwellings units that meet the criteria for senior citizen dwelling units but which are occupied by a single adult with Autism Spectrum Disorders ,(ASD) or by two individuals at least one of whom has ASD., C. Accessory Uses:; Accessory Uses allowed within the PSR -4, Planned Senior, !Residential Zoning District., Signs allowed per the PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential Zoning District., Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX iD. Development Standards. Development standards for the PSR -4, Zoning District shall apply. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 3420 HERITAGE DRIVE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 2. Planned Unit Development District -2 (PUD -2) — Erik's Ranch A. Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Rembrandt Manor, Hennepin County, Minnesota. B. Principal Uses: Buildings containing four or more dwellings units which are senior citizen dwelling units or dwellings units that meet the criteria for senior citizen dwelling units but which are occupied by a single adult with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) or by two individuals at least one of whom has ASD. C. Accessory Uses: Accessory Uses allowed within the PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential Zoning District. Signs allowed per the PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential Zoning District. D. Development Standards. Development standards for the PSR -4, Zoning District shall apply. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. City Clerk incr ental impact these "small" redevelopments could have on parking. Schr er said th 988 plan should be revisited to ensure that over time the City is m deliberat nd cognizant when reviewing further redevelopment plans for s area. Commissione ischer said in his opinion the layout is good; howeve grees that the west elevation c Id be softened. Fischer said he isn't a big fan o for facilities; however a placement of this drive - through window i rrect. Concluding, Fischer said in his o ion the plan is reasonable. Chair Grabiel acknowledN the importance of continui Vn o achieve the goals of the City in providing pedestrian nnectivity, adding /dn t have a problem with City staff striking the 8 -foot wide si walk requiremenially sin ce the 5 -foot wide sidewalk is new and at the reque of the City. A discussion ensued about the west eTq The applicant and architect said in their are appropriate. It was pointed out the window on the west elevation along wi elevation would appear very active. this elevation. io nd if that elevation should be enhanced. on the proportions on the west elevation is active; there is a drive - through e dows in the "dining" area. At night this also ed that landscaping should soften Commissioner Schroeder co ented that he hasn't se a photo metric study of lighting and questioned if th is any impact from lighting: s. Anderson, architect for the project said there is n moval of lighting, adding nothin hould really change. Commissioner Forrest ed relocation of light poles to frame fR%building. Motion Commissioner sCher moved to recommend Site Plan Approval ba on staff findings and bject to staff conditions, adding a condition to the city gineers /Fot ion that the required sidewalk improvements per the Franc venue provements (an 8 -foot wide sidewalk) shall be completed on site s of the site plan approval or when the France Avenue sidewal on roperties to the north and south are installed. Commissioner ded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Schroeder, Carpenter, Fischer and ; Staunton and Platteter. C. Rezoning. Erik's Ranch.' 3420 Heritage Drive, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Erik's Ranch and Retreats is requesting a rezoning of 3420 Heritage Drive from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the purpose of allowing adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) within the existing building. There are no exterior changes proposed to Page 6of9 the site or building. The request is simply to allow adults with ASD to live within this building. The interior of the building would be remodeled. The existing building contains 59 units; 35 of those units would be used for long -term residents with ASD. The remaining 24 units would short term stays. Roger Knutson, the city attorney, has advised staff that the City could face liability for rejecting a rental application from an individual with a disability who does not meet the minimum age requirement for City housing. The attorney has recommended two options. One, rezone the site to PUD to allow the current use plus adults with ASD or two, amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow adults with disabilities or ASD within all PSR - 4 Zoning District. Staff and the applicant are recommending'a rezoning to PUD, rather than opening up the use City wide within all PSR -4 Districts. Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve Preliminary & Final Rezoning from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish the PUD Zoning District to allow adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) at 3420 Heritage Drive. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. There would be no exterior changes the existing site or building. 3. Each unit within the existing building would be remodeled to accommodate the new residents. 4. The traffic analysis of the proposed use done by traffic consultant, WSB & Associates concludes that there would be no impact to the adjacent roadway system. The number of residents and number of employees would not change with the additional land use. 5. The proposal meets the following goals, and policies in the Comprehensive Plan: a:. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types. b. ",Promote a vision 'of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. c. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. Appearing for the Applicant Kathryn Nordberg Discussion Commissioner Staunton questioned what's driving this zoning change. Planner Teague responded that the building owner desires to include adults with Autism Spectrum Page 7 of 9 Disorders to live within the existing building. Teague noted that 3420 Heritage Drive is zoned PSR -4 which is a seniors only zoning designation. Commissioner Forrest said she has a concern with the autism only restriction. She questioned if it should be "open" to all disabilities or at least make it broader than Autism Spectrum Disorders. Teague responded in discussions with the City Attorney it was felt that limiting the disability criteria would afford the City more protections and flexibility. Chair Grabiel referred to the applicant narrative noting it appears the applicant has designed a program to meet the needs of a specific group of adults with autism. Commissioners agreed. A discussion ensued with Commissioners struggling with the clause that limits disability citing legal concerns. Commissioners noted there are adults with multiple disabilities questioning if the City (Zoning) could be challenged on this restriction. Continuing Commissioners acknowledged the complexity of the option of changing the zoning code to permit adults with disabilities from residing in the PSR zoning districts and recommended placing this consideration on the "bucket list" for future consideration. Applicant Presentation Ms. Nordberg addressed the Commission informing them one in 88 births are autistic. Nordberg explained this program was developed to provide living, working and social opportunities for young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). She added the proposed program will interface well with the existing senior population. Public Comment Carol Bell, 6321 Barrie Road commented that while she has no objections to the proposed change in population she wants assurances that all issues were considered and that the continued safety of all Edina residents isn't jeopardized. Ms. Nordberg said she understands the`concern expressed by Ms. Bell and added that the adults would be carefully screened by licensed staff and would be mild to high functioning with no history of violence. Nordberg said that safety for all is of the utmost importance. Concluding, Nordberg said the program would be highly structured, reiterating new residents would be carefully screened and behavioral therapists would be on staff. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone else would like to speak to this issue; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Page 8of9 Commissioner Carpenter asked Ms. Nordberg what goes into the screening process. Ms. Nordberg responded that all records of the potential residents are reviewed by licensed staff. These records include all their school records, medical records and psych /behavioral records. Carpenter asked what would "deem" someone unacceptable. Nordberg responded an individual with violent tendencies and verbal abuse. Commissioner Forrest said her first impression was that it was too restrictive with regard to disabilities; however, after further consideration she believes if the City is very clear this idea would work. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved rezoning approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including adopting the proposed ordinance as written. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. C�iL«Z� Chair Grabiel a %CMISSION dged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR A COMMENTS Chair Grabiel acknowled back of packet mated Commissioner Staunton sugg ed that the C mission revisit their work plan. Staunton said the Commission s uld com re'the Comprehensive Plan with the work plan. Commissioners agreed. Chair Grabiel said in discussions w' P ner Teague it was decided that the regularly scheduled Planning Commissio eeting December 26th be cancelled noting the Holiday. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague said had no further comments. X. ADJOURNM Commissio,q,fr Forrest moved meeting adjournment at 8M. Commissioner Carpenter econded the motion. All voted aye; motion ca d. lTa��ie �oo�eiraOilde� Respectfully submitted Page 9 of 9 o� e 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague November 14, 2012 VI.0 Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Erik's Ranch and Retreats is requesting a rezoning of 3420 Heritage Drive from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the purpose of allowing adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) within the existing building. (See location on pages Al A5.) There are no exterior changes proposed to the site or building. The request is simply to allow adults with ASD to live within this building. The interior of the building would be remodeled. (See applicant narrative on pages A9— A15c.) The existing building contains 59 units; 35 of those units would be used for long -term residents with ASD. The remaining 24 units would short term stays. Roger Knutson, the city attorney, has advised staff that the City could face liability for rejecting a rental application from an individual with a disability who does not meet the minimum age requirement for City housing. The attorney has recommended two options. One, rezone the site to PUD to allow the current use plus adults with ASD or two, amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow adults with disabilities or ASD within all PSR -4 Zoning District. Staff and the applicant are recommending a rezoning to PUD, rather than opening up the use City wide within all PSR -4 Districts. To accommodate this proposal, the following is requested: ➢ Preliminary and Final Rezoning from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ A Zoning Ordinance Amendment that establishes the PUD, Zoning District. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Crosstown Highway 62. Easterly: A three -story residential apartment building; zoned PRD -5; and guided High Density Residential. Southerly: Three -story apartment buildings zoned PRD -4; and guided High Density Residential. Westerly: The Heritage of Edina — Senior Housing; zoned PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 40,663 square feet in size, is relatively flat and contains a four -story senior housing building. (See pages A4 —A7.) The building is part of "the Heritage" senior housing campus, which includes the three properties to the west. (See page A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: High Density Residential (See page A8.) Zoning: PSR-4, Planned Senior Residential District (See page A3.) Park!ng/Traffic /Site Circulation As mentioned above, there are no proposed changes to the building or the site. Access to the site would remain off Heritage Drive. The existing parking would remain unchanged. There is an underground parking facility accessed of the west side of the building. There is a circular driveway in front of the building for pick up and drop off of residents. That too would remain unchanged. The majority of the exiting residents of this building do not drive. As proposed it is anticipated that one in 35 of these residents would drive, less than those that drive now in the facility. The current staffing of the facility would not change with the change in use. There are up to 17 staff on a peak day. Currently the majority of the staffing arrives and leaves during shift changes at 7am, 3pm, and 11 pm. Transportation to activities and appointments off site for the residents is provided with two buses, two or three times per day. This also will not change with the proposed change in use. The site deliveries and normal site operations will also not change. The anticipated long -term length of stay of residents means that resident moving vehicle traffic will be greatly reduced. 2 This site is part of a four lot development of senior housing that was approved by the City back in the late 1960's and early 1970's. (See page A4.) Overall there are 257 units with 154 parking stalls. Based on the number of units in the development, 192 spaces are required; therefore, the existing development is nonconforming. The amount of parking has served the development well over the years. City staff has not received any complaints in regard to traffic or parking. The applicant would have access to the parking lots on the adjacent sites to the west. WSB Conducted a traffic study to determine the impacts on the change in use. (See pages Al6 —A18.) As demonstrated in the study, the change in use on the site would not impact the existing traffic or parking on the site. It is not anticipated to be needed, but parking stalls could be added on the existing site and adjacent site to the west in the existing lawn areas. (See page A5.) Landscaping The existing site contains mature landscaping, including understory and overstory trees. (See landscape plan on page Al 5a.) These would all remain. Based on the perimeter of the site, 21 overstory trees are required. The site contains 22, therefore, meets City Code. Building /Building Material The existing building is made of painted white brick. Again, there are no changes proposed to the exterior of the building. (See pages A6 —A7 and Al4—Al 5.) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; 3 b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City, c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The purpose of this request is to allow for the mixing of land uses within the development and allow for a variety of housing types, specifically housing for adults with ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorders. The impact to the site is minimal, and it preserves the existing structure. The inside of the building would be improved with new hardwood floor, appliances, utilities, toilets, faucets, dishwashers, and lights. 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. 4 The only new use that would be introduced to the site is that adults with ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorders would be allowed to live in the building. All other uses allowed in the PSR -4 District would continue to be allowed. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "High Density Residential - HDR," which allows for all types of high density residential housing. However, the current zoning of PSR-4 only allows senior housing. The proposal to allow adults with ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorders, would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See pages Al 9-A20 for a list of uses allowed within the PSR-4 District.) Staff has prepared the PUD Ordinance, which simply allows adults with ASD, in addition to senior housing. (See draft Ordinance on pages A21 -A22.) ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned above, the proposed uses would be senior housing and housing for adults with ASD, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. W. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and . The allowed uses on the site would limit the need for additional parking on the site. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the existing building complies with the exiting PSR -4 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone these sites to PUD, these setbacks would remain the requirements for the site. Compliance Table * Existing nonconforming use PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed use of the site reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would blend into the existing use with little impact. There are no changes proposed to the existing building or site. The number of units within the building would remain 59. Each unit would however, be remodeled with new hardwood floors, appliances, utilities, toilets, faucets, dishwashers, and lights. 2. As demonstrated in the attached traffic study from WSB, there would be no impact to the adjacent roadway system. (See pages Al6 —A18.) The number C City Standard (PSR -4) Proposed PUD Building Setbacks Front — Heritage Drive 35 feet 41 feet Side Street — North 35 feet 35 feet Side — East 25 feet 35 feet Rear — West 25 feet 40 feet Building Height Eight Stories 4 -5 Stories Parking Stalls 44 site & 192 overall 28 underground stalls + shared parking with the two adjacent properties. Total parking for thr Heritage campus is 154 stalls' Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Existing nonconforming use PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed use of the site reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would blend into the existing use with little impact. There are no changes proposed to the existing building or site. The number of units within the building would remain 59. Each unit would however, be remodeled with new hardwood floors, appliances, utilities, toilets, faucets, dishwashers, and lights. 2. As demonstrated in the attached traffic study from WSB, there would be no impact to the adjacent roadway system. (See pages Al6 —A18.) The number C of residents and number of employees would not significantly change with the additional land use. Adults with ASD are less likely to drive than senior residents. 3. The proposal meets the following goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types. b. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. c. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life.. • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site. As highlighted above, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: 1. Allow for the mixing of land uses within the development and allow for a variety of housing types, specifically housing for adults with ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorders. The impact to the site is minimal, and it preserves the existing structure. The inside of the building would be improved with new hardwood floors, appliances, utilities, toilets, faucets, dishwashers, and lights. 2. Ensure that the proposed new use, adults with ASD, would be allowed to live within this building. It would not allow adults with ASD within other PSR Zoning District. The PUD allows the City to examine this proposed use on a case by case basis to determine impacts on the site and adjacent roadways. 3. The only new use that would be introduced to the site is that adults with ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorders would be allowed to live in the building. All other uses allowed in the PSR -4 District would continue to be allowed. 4. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "High Density Residential — HDR," which allows for all types of high density residential housing. However, the current zoning of PSR-4 only allows senior housing. The proposal to allow adults with ASD would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7 Staff Recommendation Preliminary & Final Rezoning to PUD Recommend that the City Council approve Preliminary & Final Rezoning from PSRA Planned Senior Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish the PUD Zoning District to allow adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) at 3420 Heritage Drive. Approval is subject to the following findings: - 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. There would be no exterior changes the existing site or building. 3. Each unit within the existing building would be remodeled to accommodate the new residents. 4. The traffic analysis of the proposed use done by traffic consultant, WSB & Associates concludes that there would be no impact to the adjacent roadway system. The number of residents and number of employees would not change with the additional land use. 5. The proposal meets the following goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types. b. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. C. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. Deadline for a city decision: January 15, 2013 8 ki- City of Edina 6061 6040 6041 —� 1140 6045 604! 6C65 f ";4 Legend 6108 6703 6100 16701 6100 Surrounding Houso Number 6101 6100 6101 6100 6101 6100 6101 6100 Lb f. 8709 6101 6103 6104 6103 6104 6103 6104 6f05 6104 6103 6104 House Number Labels 6117 6106 6109 6106 6109 6108 6109 6108 Street Na me Labels p pp 6109 6106 6109 6108 6173 6112 6777 6171 ^/ City Limits 6117 6111 ¢ 6717 6111 6177 6112 4 6117 6116 rt 6117 6116 6117 6116 Creeks 8119 6121 Y T 6121 6120 6121 6120 Laks Names 6116 6117 6116 e m 6717 6116 m 6117 6724 6125 6 12< 6115 6124 ,- Lakes yy 6125 6124 a 6120 6121 6120 8121 6110 6121 6128 6129 6128 6129 6128 Parks m 6129 6172 6733 6132 6133 6132 Parcels 6118 6124 6125 6174 6123 6f2J 6125 6137 6176 6133 6132 6128 6129 6128 11Y71 61 6IN0 �W � p40s fON6 24 �iX x i 6100 FO }rv:E 5 6trit — Pars 62f7 6210 6217 6210 3474 3420 6200 6121 6214 #�' 6213 6714 3450 6210 6221 6220 34 6229 1 pib 6275 6226 6227 6226 OO t NER/7A GE OR 6232 6273 6232 Peery � 3705 6219 6236 6239 6238 t 6245 6244 6245 6244 0 6249 6301 6300 6301 6300 6310 6311 6711 63" 6305 6304 6310 6311 6310 16204 6316 K 6317 6314 6315 6314 0 6322 6323 6320 6321 6720 6714 6370 6327 6326 6333 6332 6338 6345 6779 6776 6345 6344 S�lfl PID: 2902824210010 ✓, ° ~� 3420 Heritage Dr -'X11 V L Edina, MN 55435 �,t� •b r� 7111711 Z AW& A3 City of Edina 6041 6040 604, 6040 6045 6044 .1 6044 Legend 0106 6103 6100 6101 6100 Surrounding Number 6161 6100 6761 6100 8101 6100 6101 6100 Labels 1109 6104 6103 6104 6705 6104 6706 6704 6103 6104 6105 6104 House Number Labels 6713 6106 6106 6109 6106 6109 6108 Street Name Labels �f" 6109 6106 6109 8108 6115 6711 6717 6112 •' 'r Clty Limits 6117 6112 6117 6712 6173 K if 71 4 611] 6117 6116 6117 6116 Creeks 6121 6716 T 6121 6110 6121 6720 El Lake Names 16119 6116 6117 6176 < H A 11 6116 m fi117 H11 6125 6114 6113 6171 ❑ i. .kes 6113 6110 6116 6129 61L 61M 6126 Park. 6124 6121 � 1170 6771 6120 6121 7.oriinO b1129 6732 6137 6172 6733 6172 6126 6124 6125 6124 6123 6124 6123 6137 6136 ■ APD(Aviwno66c P..q D.-I �� 61.0 � YDOJIMuoe De.cbPTnnl Devctl 16/71 6126 6129 6126 _rY63 ■ MDD61kte"Dvab_'D.— ■ MO044Mu"Dr,.eb - DeA1.11 82wsrw p05'rows "Onto ■ KD.11PWwti Cenww>lDmnr.l 24 ■ PCD-I lNann "CemmmmlDsirial —" 7 t ■ PCD- 3(PbWne6ComrSrmlD "nrfl i 6200 Gtr +clifwr Perk ID7197 >gs 6211 6210 ■ PCOlf (►btnatl Crm�os D�rtml • 6217 6210 ❑ M (P—M k6 —! D—el ❑ FOD -1 iPWed Off— Dstrigl ( � 34-M 3420 6200 6221 6114 6115 6114 O POD 2(P1- -ON Oia+,ki i 3450 6220 6221 6110 ■ ►RD- lift— "Reai4e^-D —il I 74 61M ■ NiD.2 (PWn "Reskanid D "rrml -i al 0233 6226 6221 611E . PRO.341 nn "R —t.lar D—cil 9FJZ9A(EMi 6232 6177 6272 ■ ►RD 4 {Wniwd RedCm�td DiMnl A{ 1436 6239 . MD -6 (Ptmtwl RentlantolOaVictl tide 3201_ 1 6278 6239 6138 ■ ►SRdIPi+^n "Smsv Datr;c7l 6249 8144 6145 6144 ❑ R t lSinpb DwWnp Unit' - I' 6249 ■ R- 240 - -00—.9 UM) 6300 6301 6300 © RMD(Rapcnal MalcalDa<nsll ✓ 6700 6310 6301 6704 6705 6304 n Parcels 6212 6311 6710 6711 6710 0716 6317 6314 6715 6314 I \ QKQ i 6104 5t 0 6711 a 6327 6320 6321 6320 w 6327 6316 6770 i 6373 6732 $ 67)0 6345 (�1 6339 6338 I W o�arwFAW6. HODS ®iDE 6)H 6)46 6344 - _ PID:2902824210010 p, 3420 Heritage Dr N 4 tiS, Ur tia Edina, MN 55435 1tt,larci:i. +'fit Z AW& A3 �R��L". R i I A�A As City of Edina 'r • •� 20 _ -� 6118 I - _ Legend Surrounding Howe Number �� 6115 e�t�' 612i �� ^a 1 1 L. yt K `6114 �.,,. {(; r -. '•6171 fi115. ' La be is House Number Labels vow s _ �- Street Name Labels ".;•..• !'. Y. City Limits 6119 617° T• ri p t i.'•...� I. P% k'+ - " "id et I '*tlf*e, .y -,2 '� y �/ Creeks O Laka Names . ` '�S�rr!.+. � T• T Lakes Parks i '�' A R. Parcels 2099 Aerial Photo s / to NtKW .v r �,. 1 yst °' IpNP ttr �f_. nry'l'. 1 ry EB MY 67 TOXEl ESA VPS d All r• 1 sy�'A 1 n j - f ' �` t • �t i` 1414 3420� • r•. T 6200 I axITA�4 a. 1 C f d "ZO1 3105 ►t w a ■ 4ym1.:�AWi. Cmry[ICI rr..�U; 91K 1 PID: 2902824210010 O �, r a 3420 Heritage Dr c a 1F� Edina ! MN 55435` y �j 4!Ilpl As '; �. �: }. �!. . _� _ ;� .�.. 1 (- a.. �.5� - �;' M ; � � �"� - -- �� . � _ �.� ; R� _� _ - .. ." .. .t � n ;i'�i i �,� fs � ��, 0 % 7��r ,Y t n iii► r, e , r-- � ;;�. � - a 1. iF 1111{`� a1 II II r- Future Land Use Plan with OVIA City of Edina Building Heights Southeast Quadrant 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Fgme4.6B Data Sauce: URS A�( ® 0 0.5 Miles J Oc May 29, 2012 OW tAN T N0RATtve The apartments will be refurbished to accommodate the new residents and their high sensory needs and allergy free environments; carpets replaced with hardwood floors, quiet appliances — toilets, faucets, dishwashers — lights that don't flicker, etc., in fi� Erik's Ranch & Retreats Request for Change of Use Heritage of Edina, Roybet Building, 3420 Heritage Drive Comparison Document: Assisted Living elderly &disabled usage /Young adult disabled usage Request for Change of Use Erik's Ranch & Retreats would like to formally request that the current zoning of Senior Housing for the Roybet building at 3420 Heritage Drive be augmented to include e r i k' S disabled adults. ranch & retreats The purpose and challenge for Erik's Ranch & Retreats begins with an estimated one in gg children who have ASD, the prevalence of which has risen dramatically over the past vision knows no bounds two decades. While much of the autism research focuses on children, the amount of Board of Directors: research and services drops dramatically for adults. With roughly half a million autistic Patrick i Bradley Karen King children reaching adulthood in the next decade and one in three young adults with autism g y g Kathryn Nordberg, CEO who have no paid experience, college or technical schooling, experts say it's an issue MedicalAdvisoryBoard: policy makers urgently need to address. It is this large and growing problem that Erik's Eric V. Larsson, Ph.D., LP, BCBA lunelyn Lazo- Pearson, Ph.D., BCBA -D Ranch & Retreats seeks to solve in a way that has not been done so comprehensively. ^ IvorLovaas, Ph.D., 2007 -2010 Rudrud, Ph.D., LP Our mission is to provide living, working, social and recreational opportunities for young Business Advisory Board. adults with ASD based on our guiding principles of lifelong learning, individual Diane Reardon Crawford Jill Galvez community building, and bidirectional integration through voluntourism (combining Tom Gerrard Larrylordan vacationing and volunteering.) We are committed to providing a rewarding life in which Karen Reis individuals with ASD will experience dignity, compassion, and continuing possibilities. Beihua Sheng Brian Stage Charles Wilson We can make significant strides in doing this with the Roybet building, at Heritage of Education advisory Board: Edina. In this planned long -term residence, 35 adults with autism spectrum disorders Penny Kodrich (ASD) will live, work, socialize and enjoy recreational activities in the safe, secure and Marylo Matchinsky nurturing environment we will provide. As the chart below indicates, despite the different demographic, operations and activities will not change significantly. We will also maintain 24 short-term stay apartments using them for respite, transition [� Ly �v7 `� Dv stays, family stays, and volunteers. This is identical to our current configuration at Heritage of Edina. We have some long -term residents, but over time, the average length of resident stays has diminished. Transportation provided to current elderly /disabled residents will be provided to the planned residents as they integrate into the surrounding communities. Traffic levels should remain relatively stable, although there will be fewer large moving vehicles as the residents will comprise a more stable, long -term population. The apartments will be refurbished to accommodate the new residents and their high sensory needs and allergy free environments; carpets replaced with hardwood floors, quiet appliances — toilets, faucets, dishwashers — lights that don't flicker, etc., in fi� accordance with the building guide Advancing Full Spectrum Housing — Designing for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Erik's Ranch & Retreats is a new paradigm for adults with ASD. There is nothing like it in the country. Our guiding principles are based on what individuals can do rather than what they cannot. Interest in our model has been shown as close as California and Nebraska and as far away as Australia. At the suggestion of the Neuroscience community, we will propose that the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) intramural program study the residents. NIMH outcome information, provided at five - year intervals, will benefit the autism community. The autistic community is noticing and the tide is turning for adults with ASD. Edina, as it has been in many other instances, will be on the forefront of implementing this cutting -edge model for young adults with autism. Roybet Building Current Planned for Erik's Retreat Heritage of Edina 3420 Heritage Drive Age of adults in 40+ 18 -30 at entry; aging together residence Type of disability Physical, emotional, mental Autism Spectrum disorders, served health including: dementia, depression. Occurrence of Alzheimer's, depression, physical disability aligns with schizophrenia, bi- polar, other. general population. Medical support allowed within Medication administration assisted living license with support allowed within RN /LPN, CNA staff. assisted living license with RN/LPN staff. Apartments 59 No change Capacity Studios /singles /doubles No change Parking Garage /surface lots No change Staff /services Nursing, aids, wellness, Behavior therapists, dietary, activities, dietary, housekeeping, janitorial, housekeeping, janitorial, maintenance / admin, PT, LPN maintenance /admin Visitors /family Growing, encouraged Similar /volunteers ' Moving In/Out Frequent/average stay two Rare /35 residents will make years this home for 50 -60 years. Transportation Provided into community Provided into community Rf1 Background — Individuals with Autism Most require assistance with: • Social skills • Some activities of daily living • Transportation (like our elderly residents, few individuals with autism drive.) • Job support • Medication management • Financial management The richness in our model comes from the volunteers /families and short-term stay residents who visit. Our permanent residents will help support the short-term volunteers /guests who stay at Heritage of Edina. We will combine the guest rooms from the four buildings and locate them in the Roybet building. In this way, our residents can provide personal concierge services to our guests, as well as have the social interaction so necessary for their well- being. In addition, we will also pair some residents with autism with elderly residents for companionship (with staff monitoring). These young people will also be integrated into the community through other work, recreation and varied social activities. Erik's Ranch & Retreats Erik's Ranch & Retreats, launched in 2008, is a 501c(3) nonprofit corporation with two locations. Our model is an innovative living, working and social model for residents and upscale volunteer /family guest accommodations at both the ranch in Paradise Valley, Montana, and the urban retreat in Edina, Minnesota. Not only will both locations become home to .young adults with autism, but what sets Erik's Ranch & Retreats apart is that these unique destinations will be supported by the residents who live there. Erik's Ranch & Retreats provides "residents with excellent housing, recreation and the ability to use their talents, follow their dreams and lead lives full of promise and possibility. Our goals are to (1) match the environment with the residents' strengths, abilities and desires, (2) increase residents' skills enabling independence and participation in the community, and (3) provide surroundings that encourage family and community participation. We will achieve these goals using our guiding principles of Lifelong Learning, Individual Community Building and Bidirectional integration. 4 I ��r°�i 1 ___ /- -_ ,��a I www A( L� Ai �- 1 L3.0 C) -7 Co NORTH OL- silver Malil, Planting Be, �61ue Sp -'" Vent cover m 19- Blue Planting U -lawn- Vent Co over Per'nhlal Bed- Planting Box —1k Vent Uvcr 12- W. e Sp,uc Aiborvltae Pl..,IZg Be. Planting Box G, Vent Vent �V—eeee oo G _12 ppl,8a, E _WnEE.' land a Snn�- b". 4=1 eau Shrub Plandnj Pa— Pado 03 shrub Z, �i , utillue, - PT4 ;z cons Shilk n� ------------ P.-, Pa.. ---------- ------ O i .' Fla Pole Ca - lawn -', He —b Ung !n.n Ul- hmb PlanU.9 (12)Judper Con. Pad Had, awn Mppl. -U.n- S' Home 6-Jap,nese �e glut Ulac son T7 Shrub =Pl..U.d 24- D.roo,ged Tne- - Z)-Sh,ub -IMCrahap E,.M,!n s1,.b_ e -H li ad 1 L3.0 C) -7 Co NORTH OL- . N o LLJ U U in Iii p� 4=1 eau 03 PT4 41 lqf 411, C.e 149p) __m; (4 va-j '7 9IN xr\ I 111��1 ,1 1.�lir ;s d2 CA /_\ T [IT EK RG I 4a) 0.- 1:42, MIN TN. -FT- __o 4:-' r4 ., 6' 41 -A.z- 4. uu a .Q mm 13 f lzx, n6 T' ..;, �. i � n 7i ��i_o-4 ie ; Cni . _._. �+yf�la'�. ��sia orrd �Wii 1 T Memorandum DATE: November 1, 2012 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, City Engineer City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE. Erik's Ranch (3420 Heritage Drive) Traffic Review City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 - 02 Background The purpose of this review is to determine any potential traffic impacts the proposed change in use for the Erik's Ranch facility located in the Roybet building at 3420 Heritage Drive would have on the adjacent roadway system. The site is located just south of TH 62 (Crosstown) west of Xerxes Avenue on Heritage Drive. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The Erik's Ranch project proposes a change in the current use to also include disabled adults with autism spectrum disorder. No changes to the site are proposed with any additional living space for residents. Access to the site is provided from Heritage Drive and will not change. Site Trip Generation The current site consists of 59 apartment units for physically, emotionally and mentally disabled adults 40 and over. 24 of the units are short term apartments for respite, transition stays, family stays and volunteers. The remaining 35 units are for the long term residents. The average age of the current residents are 89 years old. The average stay of a current resident is two years. The proposed new use of the site will not change the 59 total residential units including 24 short term and 35 long term units. The primary change will be with the age, 18 years old and over, and the primary disability, autism spectrum disorders. The average stay of the residents with the proposed change in use is expected to be for an extended period of time, up to 50+ years. A16 WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 � Minneapolis, MN 55416 & Associates, Inc. Tel: 763 541 -4600 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum DATE: November 1, 2012 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, City Engineer City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE. Erik's Ranch (3420 Heritage Drive) Traffic Review City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 - 02 Background The purpose of this review is to determine any potential traffic impacts the proposed change in use for the Erik's Ranch facility located in the Roybet building at 3420 Heritage Drive would have on the adjacent roadway system. The site is located just south of TH 62 (Crosstown) west of Xerxes Avenue on Heritage Drive. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The Erik's Ranch project proposes a change in the current use to also include disabled adults with autism spectrum disorder. No changes to the site are proposed with any additional living space for residents. Access to the site is provided from Heritage Drive and will not change. Site Trip Generation The current site consists of 59 apartment units for physically, emotionally and mentally disabled adults 40 and over. 24 of the units are short term apartments for respite, transition stays, family stays and volunteers. The remaining 35 units are for the long term residents. The average age of the current residents are 89 years old. The average stay of a current resident is two years. The proposed new use of the site will not change the 59 total residential units including 24 short term and 35 long term units. The primary change will be with the age, 18 years old and over, and the primary disability, autism spectrum disorders. The average stay of the residents with the proposed change in use is expected to be for an extended period of time, up to 50+ years. A16 Erik's Ranch Traffic Review City of Edina November 1, 2012 Page 2 of 2 The current staffing of the facility will not significantly change with the proposed change in use. There is up to 17 staff on a peak day. Currently the majority of the staffing arrives and leaves during shift changes at lam, 3pm and 11 pm. Transportation to activities and appointments off site for the residents is provided with two buses two or three times per day. This will not change with the proposed changes in use. Site delivery's and normal site operations (maintenance /janitorial) will not change with the proposed changes in use. In addition with the proposed extended length of stay of a resident moving vehicle traffic will be greatly reduced. Traffic generation rates used to estimate the current (and proposed) traffic levels is based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. Table 1 below shows the total daily, AM Peak and PM peak hour trip generation for an assisted living facility with 59 total units on the site. Table 1- Estimated Site Trip Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Assisted Living 59 Units 1 120 60 60 9 6 3 12 7 5 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the traffic review documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: ■ The proposed use of the site will change from residential units for physically, emotionally and mentally disabled adults 40 and over to residential units for 18 years old and over with autism spectrum disorders. ■ The number of units 35 long tern and 24 short term (59 total) will not change with the proposed use change. ■ The average number of staff and services will not change with the proposed use change. ■ The proposed traffic generation from the site will not significantly change with the proposed use change, which is estimated to 120 daily trips, 9 AM peak hour trips and 12 PM peak hour trips. Based on these conclusions no impacts to the adjacent roadway system would be expected, therefore, no improvements would be required to accommodate the proposed change in use for the site. A-1 Date; Printed: 11/1/2012 wee rrtenome: K: %uiocC-zyu%"a\exn-r —oo -zv ng -ui- cr—, Y op a X0911 n _m —� O y m t��! a NC-)" CD C ccCp CD 0 CD cc CD v •C•rL. I 1� IIIVVUALL II AVE. �I WILRY AN PnJOSEPH I N �� N m onll 26. 'ISHERWOOD AVE.I 3 °z BRITTANY RD. RYAN °; AVE. PARNELL: AVE. nVl O n - �7N1�OS 21 ZRGINIA AVE. D m-S rHORE DR. � < n ti o CRESTON G o m < RD.� WOOD DALe o Z ° N a o a^AVe ) A o POINT 2 DR. A `O KELLOGG AVE. OAK LAWN a AVE. / COR NELIA CIR. LOUCHEST ER A TR. = ATHERICJ BLVD. 3RIST 0�- LYMAR ° LA. LA. � SAND FE W:D oROO N � a O ~ AVE. II m �o 1 "Ul AVE. 0 Doc nn� C) O J DREW ' x I i to i n m m z z V �• o CD rt fORK r O 00 In XERXES nn ID FE W:D oROO N � a O ~ AVE. II m �o 1 "Ul AVE. 0 Doc nn� C) O J DREW AVE. i to `jF TINGDALE gm toZ Q Z> oa m z z 26. n n EW 26. LAKE -,l SHERWOOD RU TH 'L-D' 1--, AVE. or- Q RYAN AVE. Y N DR. s DALRYMPLEr = RD. O C A c = r ^' a L v PARNELL AVE' pvE °o � ST. ANDREW' SAVE. 5 VIRGINIA �� r CONCORD AVE. DR. 0 0 0 0 a AS HCROFT o AVE. m z �� x ° " ASHCROF' a ST. JOHN'S o AVE. °� °° ST. s: J0 0 S AVE. ° MILLERJS o FAIRFAX WOOD DALE F. ° A AVE. Sao SE o L0� s = o KELLOGG AVE.[ T ao N a^ O p o �' can OAKLA WN [ FT BROOKVIEW AVE. + OAKLAWN 71 AVE. ° BR00 KVIEW7 = AVE. l PL. MIN C. L g PEACEDALE 7 W�00 C FR R�' E { AVE. W000� W00 �'FST HALIFA: HALIFAX y y D� HALIFAX N HALIFAX GRIMES GF �, WOp LA. Za �2o HALIFAX LA. �, • OAVE. �� N FIB r, O N AVE. a � � 9 .�ti AVE. m _ EWING ^ AVE. EWING CIR. N DREW AVE. Ln N COLONY BEARD ' o z + CHOWEN AVE. + p � , - �. to P m WAY -' BEARD AVE 7 O ABBOTT AVE. L ± ABB OTT C D. = ZENITH o AVE. D ° m L:!X7ERXE]S ORK AVE. ° c� m AVE. Z 7 7 Y City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.13 building setbacks, as provided in paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of Subsection 850.11. E. Decks and Patios. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 850.07, the first 200 square feet of an unenclosed deck or patio shall not be included when computing building coverage. F. Basements. All double dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for the purposes of this paragraph. G. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a double dwelling unit building shall measure less than eighteen feet in width, as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. 850.13 Planned Residence District (PRD, PSR). Subd. 1 Subdistricts. The Planned Resident District shall be divided into the following subdistricts: Planned Resident District —1 (PRD -1) Planned Resident District — 2 (PRD -2) Planned Resident District — 3 (PRD -3) Planned Resident District — 4 (PRD -4) Planned Resident District — 5 (PRD -5) Planned Senior Residence — 3 (PSR -3) Planned Senior Residence — 4 (PSR -4) Subd. 2Principal Uses. A. PRD -1. Single dwelling unit buildings, double dwelling unit buildings and residential townhouses. B. PRD -2. Residential buildings containing six or fewer dwelling units. C. PRD -3 and PRD -4. All residential buildings. Also day care facilities licensed by the State. D. PRD -5. Rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes. E. PSR -3 and PSR -4. Buildings containing four or more dwelling units, all but one of which are senior citizen dwelling units. Subd. 3 Accessory Uses. A. PRD -1. All. accessory uses allowed in the R -1 District. B. All Other Subdistricts. All accessory uses allowed in the R -2 District. C. PRD -4, PRD -5 and PSR -4. Shops, restaurants and other services primarily intended for the use and convenience of residents of the principal use, provided that such 850-69 Ali Supplement 2012 -01 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.13 accessory uses are accessible only from the interior of the principal building, are located only on the ground floor of the principal building, and have no signs or display visible from the outside of the principal building. Not more than ten percent of the gross floor area of a principal building shall be devoted to these accessory uses. Subd. 4Density. A. Required Lot Area. The area of the tract shall not be less than the sum of the required lot area for each dwelling unit adjusted by the allowances permitted or imposed by this paragraph: Lot Area Per Dwellin Maximum Allowance Unit Per Dwelling Unit PRD —1 10,500 Sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. PRD — 3 7,300 Sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. PRD — 3 4,400 sq. ft. 1,500 sq. ft. PRD — 4 2,900 sq. ft. 1,500 sq. ft. PRD -5 PSR — 3 3,500 sq. ft. 1,500 sq. ft. PSR — 4 2,500 sq. ft. 1,500 sq. ft *The principal building in subdistrict PRD -5 shall riot exceed an FAR of 1.2. B. Schedule of Allowances. 1. PRD -3 a. subtract 500 square feet for each parking space within or under the principal building or otherwise completely underground. (No more than 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit shall be counted). b. subtract 500 square feet for each dwelling unit if all principal buildings conform to all specifications of Type I or II construction as defined in the State Building Code as adopted by Section 410 of this Code. c. subtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if at least a 500 foot spacing is maintained between each principal and accessory building and the nearest lot line of a lot in the R -1 District used for residential purposes. d. add 500 square feet, for each bedroom in excess of two in any one dwelling unit. e. subtract 250 square feet for each dwelling unit if the tract is within 2,000 feet of an accessible freeway interchange (nearest lot line to center of interchange). 2. PRD -4 a. all allowances permitted by paragraph B.1 of this Subd. 4 for PRD-3. 850 - 70 AJO Supplement 2012 -01 Draft ORDINANCE NO. 2012- Draft AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 3420 HERITAGE DRIVE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned. Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD)' Subd. 3. Planned Unit De velo District-3 PUD -3 s Erik' .,Ranch -- -- - -p - ment — tri — 3 (- - - -- A. Legal Description:; Lot 2, Block 1, Rembrandt Manor, Hennepin County,, Minnesota.] ,B. Principal Uses: [Buildings containing four or more dwellings units which are senior citizen dwelling units or dwellings units that meet the criteria for senior citizen dwelling units but which are occupied by a single adult with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) or by two individuals at least one of whom has ASD C. Accessory Uses: Accessory Uses allowed within_ the PSR-- 4,-Planned Senior Residential Zoning District. Signs allowed per the PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential Zoning District. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — Added text — XXXX D. Development Standards. Development standards for the PSRA Zoning District shall apply. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX �a a Caryn Sullivan: An upscale retreat for people with autism - TwinCities.com TwinCitiesecom Caryn Sullivan: An upscale retreat for people with autism Pioneer Press Updated: 10/27/2011 06 :27:58 PM CDT Caryn Sullivan Two decades ago, autism was a mysterious condition known to relatively few. These days, media reports about Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) appear daily; it's rare to find someone who doesn't have a connection to the lifelong condition affecting 1 million to 1.5 million Americans. The children who were diagnosed with ASD in the 1990s have moved through the public school system legally obliged to educate them. For this aging population, focus is shifting from causation and treatment to long -term concerns. Where will they live? How will they find meaningful work? Who will care for them when their parents are gone? While peers and siblings typically leave the family home to attend college or work, those options are often unrealistic for people with ASD. Finding meaningful employment is difficult. Housing options can include remaining at home or living in a group home or apartment with support. Opportunities for community interaction may become scarce once school programs end. Years ago, Kathryn Nordberg began searching for housing and employment for her son, Erik, now 20. Discovering no options affording the quality of life she wanted for him, she assembled a team experienced with autism, business, hospitality, technology, law and health care to develop an alternative for Erik and his peers. Drawing upon her family's 55 years of experience running an assisted living facility for some whose needs mirror those with ASD, Nordberg designed Erik's Ranch and Retreats. There, young adults with moderate to high- functioning autism or Asperger's will live and work together in a safe and supported pnvimnmpnt that fnni icps nn what thpv ran rin rather than what they cannot, she said. Page 1 of 2 Established as a nonprofit in 2007, Erik's Ranch and Retreats is designed as a self- sustaining, destination - location model Nordberg hopes will be replicated worldwide (eriksranch.org). The vision is for two upscale properties featuring private apartments for adults with ASD and guest rooms for visitors and volunteers. Tapping into the growing '.voluntourism" trend, residents will have the opportunity to earn money while they develop passions and skills by working with guests and volunteers who make a donation to stay on the property and commit to spending time with the residents. Properties donated in Minnesota and Montana will be renovated once fundraising goals are achieved. In 2013, Nordberg plans to open an urban retreat in Edina that will be home to 35 residents who may work onsite in jobs typically available in the hospitality industry - personal concierge or sous chef; for instance. The 230 -acre ranch near Boze- man will accommodate 48 individuals with ASD interested in Montana's popular outdoor tourism opportunities. Residents whose interests or skill sets are not compatible with onsite jobs may participate in the Experience Guide Program, which will be piloted this spring. The program will match individual interests with opportunities to engage with guests and to participate in the community at large. For example, a person who enjoys the theater or opera could be paid to lead a group of volunteers to a performance and backstage tour. While en route to Send 1101veX a ., . G, h [`car aiiy occasion cl j a froiii 4z_1 U99 t P1 flowers i Offer ONLY availalaw at, proflowers.com /happy or call 1.877.804.1133 Print Powered ay,C9Yfy«rrri_tDynamics ii http:// www. twincities .com/opinion/ci_19209174 10/31/2011 Caryn Sullivan: An upscale retreat for people with autism - TwinCities.com TwinCitiesecom the show, the guide would provide a briefing or history about the production and the performers. After the show, an opera singer or actor might meet with the tour participants, Nordberg said. For individuals who often struggle with social skills, spending time with visitors will produce reciprocal benefits. Volunteers will gain insight into people with ASD by teaching a class to them or working side -by -side in the kitchen or office or playing chess together. "My son isn't verbal," Nordberg said. "You can't have a conversation with him over dinner." However, he loves both people and horseback riding and could lead a trail ride with guests, she said. That interaction is a win /win, as both Erik and his companions would have a meaningful, insightful social interaction. Lifetime costs associated with ASD are more than $3 million - the majority incurred in adulthood, national autism organizations report. Erik's Ranch residents will make a long -term commitment, choosing from two options. The first is for the family to purchase a lifetime membership for $325,000. If the member leaves within the first 10 years he can receive a pro -rated refund once a new resident takes his place. The second alternative is to make a three -year commitment for about $40,000 per year. Three years is the minimum commitment, Nordberg said, because it will take time to develop and implement the resident's life plan. Drawing upon the assisted living model that offers an array of a la carte services, Nordberg anticipates residents also will pay a monthly fee from income sources, such as earnings and Social Security, depending on their needs. "We are trying to make this a model that is easy for parents to access and fair to all residents," Nordberg said. Efforts are under way to secure scholarships and financial aid options. The Erik's Ranch concept is a departure from the model in which people with disabilities spend their time at day treatment centers performing repetitive tasks like sorting ties, Nordberg said. While her model will not be for everyone, "There have to be places in society where these folks care about what they are doing and thrive." Page 2 of 2 In addition to providing them with a desirable place to live, she said, "Erik's Ranch will provide an avenue for these young people to showcase their skills and talents and to do what they love to do. Why shouldn't they ?" Caryn Sullivan of Mendota Heights is a contributing columnist for the Pioneer Press. Her website is carynsullivan scribe.com and her email address is carynsullivanscribe @gmail.com. Send. flowers for any oC',.C"asion :1, B ou pets frolll 99 S:r , $19+ 7 - Oftr ONLY available au proflowerwom /happy or call 1.877.804.1133 Print Powered By 6wtrrrinatDynarrlics ,� http:// www. twincities .com/opinion/ei_19209174 10/31/2011 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Joan Wicklund <joanwic09 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 12:07 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Heritage of Edina I am responding to the Public Hearing Notice of the Edina Planning Commission. I have no objection to the Rezoning from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential to PUD, Planned Unit Development to allow for the care of disabled adults. Peace, Joan Wiciclund 6032 Xerxes Ave S Edina, MN 55410 joanwic09@gmail.com To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 4, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -163 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: A,11?I' Ow e • r1CORPORK, 1888 Agenda Item #: VIII. A Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2012 -163 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-163 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Braemar Memorial Fund: Braemar Men's Club $441.49 Edina Police Department: Dow Water Solutions $2,300.00 Edina Park Department: Drive For The Hive, LLC $795,707.00 Dated: December 4, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK New K -9 training Equipment Drive For The Hive Braemar Expansion James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of To: Mayor Hovland & Council Members From: Scott Neal City Manager Date: December 4, 2012 w.91�: O! ne F�� lBee / Agenda Item M. VIII. B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -20 CONCERNING COUNCIL SALARIES Action Requested: Approve Ordinance No. 2012 -20 with the proposed November 20, 2012, modification of City Council salaries. Information / Background: In 2011, the City hired Springsted & Associates to conduct a compensation study for employee pay. The study also included data collection and analysis of compensation for Mayor and City Council position. There were 18 cities included in the study, including, Apple Valley, Blaine, Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Lakeville, Maple Grove, Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Richfield, Roseville, St. Louis Park and Woodbury. The 2011 data showed that our compensation for the City's elected officials was below the average of the group. The 2011 average pay for Mayor in the surveyed cities was $12,342. Edina's pay is $10,348, which is 17% below the group average. For Council Members, the average pay is $9,050. Edina pays its Council Members $7,758, which is 15% below the average. Edina's elected official pay is governed in Section 120 of the City Code. The last pay increase for the City's elected officials occurred on January 1, 2008. There have been no increases in the compensation of elected officials since January I, 2008. Section 120.6 includes an attempt to index elected official pay increases to the "percentage wage increase granted to fulltime City employees ", but this provision was effective only on January I, 2008. However, even if that provision had been made effective each year and elected official pay had been indexed to employee pay increases, Mayor pay today would be estimated to be $11,088 and Council Member pay would be estimated to be $8,033 — pay levels that would still put Edina elected official pay below the average of our 2011 compensation study. At the Council's November 20 meeting, you considered a pay increase proposal that would increase the pay of the Mayor from its current level of $10,348 to $13,500, effective January 1, 2015. This action would represent a one -time increase of 30.4 %, or $3,152. However, if the percentage is averaged out over the City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 time period from January I, 2008 to January 1, 2015, the average annual increase of this proposal is 4.3 %, unadjusted for inflation that has occurred over that time period. For Council Members, the November 20 proposal would increase pay from $7,758 to $10,740, effective January 1, 2015. This action would represent an increase of $38 %, or $2,982/Council Member /year. Similarly, if the proposed pay increase is averaged over the seven year time period during which the Council Members did not receive a pay increase, the average annual increase unadjusted for inflation would be 5.4 %. The proposed salary adjustment will increase the Mayor's pay to 105.7% of the adjusted pay for the 2011 Mayor pay group. For Council Member, the proposed action would increase pay to 114.6% of the adjusted pay for the 2011 Council Member pay group. Given the pay position of Edina's elected officials compared to their peers; their lack of pay increase since January 2008; the effects of inflation on the 2008 pay levels; and the general perceived increase in the effort and cost of serving on the Edina City Council, I strongly recommend the Council consider and approve the November 20 proposed pay increases of: Mayor - Adjust the Mayor's annual salary: Jan 1, 2015 $13,500 (+$3,152) Council Member —Adjust Council Members' annual salary: Jan 1, 2015 $10,740 (+$2,982) As mentioned earlier, current City Code links future City Council pay increases with annual pay increase of City employees. While I understand the intent of that code provision was to create a perceived level of fairness and equity between elected officials and employees, I believe it has the potential to have perverse effects on our discussions and decisions about compensation, in general. I believe the concept of indexing future pay increases for the Council is a good one. I suggest that instead of linking Council pay increases to employee pay increases, the Council instead link its future pay increases to a neutral third -party index, such as the index produced each year by the Minnesota Office of Management and Budget which indexes annual increases to the State's public employee salary cap. This index is based on the Consumer Price Index and is set by an independent analytical body over which the Council has no control. This action would add transparency and neutrality to an otherwise politically sensitive action. • REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 3 EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -20 An Ordinance Amending. Section 120 of the City Code to Adjust Salaries for Council Members THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 120 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "120.01 Salaries. The salaries.of the Mayor and Council Members shall be as follows: A. Commencing January 1, 2015: Mayor: $13,500 annually Council Members: $10,740 annually 120.02 Salary Review. The Council shall review the salaries set by this Section on or before September 1 of even numbered years." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 2015. First Reading: December 4, 2012 Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor <'NA. eCe EDY" Cn CAT �y Po To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. C. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 4, 2012 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2012 -22 Amending Schedule 185A Setting Fees For 2013 Action Requested: Discuss the proposed fees and charges to be adopted by Ordinance. Approve Ordinance 2012 -22 Amending Code Section 185 Schedule A Increasing Certain Fees. Information / Background: Attached are schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance proposed for 2013. The fees that are proposed to change from 2012 to 2013 are in bold. Utility fees are proposed as presented in the Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Utility Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates last fall dated November 2011. The report is located on the City web -site under the Finance Department. The City Council chose to not have Ehlers & Associates prepare a rate study this fall and instead rely on the rates proposed in the November 2011 rate study. The new meters currently being installed could have an effect on future rates. With currently about 2/3rds of the new meters still to be installed and with the effect of the high water used during the dry summer the effect of the new meters is unknown and would require the extensive research of a rate study. Minneapolis and Edina have entered into a contract whereas Minneapolis will charge Edina 62% of the Minneapolis inside City resident rate. We have been notified that the Mayor of Minneapolis is proposing an inside rate of $3.29 which at the 62% would equal an amount charged to Edina per unit of 100 cubic feet of $2.04. The other part of the Morningside water rate is the Edina's consumption rate which is proposed to be $.40 to equal a total water usage rate of $2.44 per 100 cubic feet. This rate would compare to $2.36 charged in 2012 ($1.98 Minneapolis rate and $38 Edina consumption rate). Attachments 1) Schedule of General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01— Schedule A. 2) Schedule of General Fund revenues as they appear in the budget. 3) Ordinance No. 2012 -22 Amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE General Code Provisions.and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A Pry _ id 2012 2013 AMOUNT DEPT REV 195 195.03 Registration of Domestic Partners 25.00. 25.00 Clerk Certified Copies of Registration 10.00 10.00 Clerk Amendments to Domestic Partners or, 10.00 10.00 Clerk Notice of Termination of Domestic Partners 200 200.04 Public Dance Permit 54.00 55.00 Clerk 4137 215 215.04 Bingo Occasion, Gambling Device, 15.00 15.00 per permit Clerk 4313 Raffle Permit . 220 220.04 Machine or Amusement Device License 15.00 15.00 annually per establishment, plus Health 4176 15.00 15.00 per machine Health 4176. 225 225.04 Special Events Application Fee 60.00 65.00 Clerk 4125 300 300.02 Subd 2 Redemption of Impounded Animals 35.00 35.00 per day for feeding & care, any" veterinarian services and impounding Police 4331 fee of: 40.00 40.00 a) If animal has not been impounded within one year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 65.00 65.00 b) If animal has been impounded once within the year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 115.00 115.00 c) If animal has been impounded twice or more within one year prior Police 4331 to the date of impounding 300 300.02 Subd 3 Disposal of Animal 50.00 50.00 per animal Police ._ 300 300.03 Subd. 3 Dog License 15.00 30.00 per dog Police 4120. 10.00 20.00 per neutered dog Late charge after March 1 :. 10.00 10.00 Police 4120 300 300.03 Subd. 4 . Duplicate Dog License Tag 6.00 6.00 per duplicate tag Police 4120 300. 300.04 Subd. 2 Commercial:Kennel,License 55.00 55.00 peryear Police 300 300.15 Permit for Extra Dogs or Cats 100.00 100.00 Police _ 4120_ 300 300.17 Dangerous Dog :.. 100.00 100.00 Registration fee Police 4120 _ 405 405:01 Landscaping, Screening; or Erosion 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 Control Site Plan Permit 410 410.02 Subd. 1 Building Permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $ 1 to 500 23.50 23.50 ' Building 4111 501 to 2,000 23.50 23.50 ' for first $500 plus Building 4111 3.05 3.05 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 Building 4111 2,001 to 25,000 69.25 69:25 ' for first $2,000 plus Building 4111 14.00 14.00 for each additional $1,000 or-fraction :thereof to and including $25,000 Building 4111 25,001 to 50,000 391:25 391.25 ' for first $25,000 plus Building 4111 10.10 10.10 for each additional $1;000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 Building 4111 50;001 to 100,000 643.75 643.75 • for first $50,000 plus Building 4111 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 Building 4111 100,001 to 500,000 993.75 993.75 ' for first $100;000 plus Building 4111 5.60 5.60 for each additional $1;000 or fraction thereof to:and including $500,000 Building 4111 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,233.75 3,233.75 ' for the first $500,000 plus- Building 4111 4.75 4.75 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including Building 4111 $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 5,608.75 5,608.75 ' for the first $1,000,000 plus Building 4111 3.65 3.65 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Building 4111 ' plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4380 Plan Review 65% 65% of Permit Fee Building 4111 G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2012 1:48 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 410 410.02 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 60.00 62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 410 410.02 Subd. 3 Residential Building Contractor, 5.00 5.00 surcharge pursuant to M.S. 326.86 Building 4380 Remodeler or Specialty Contractor License Verification 415 415.02 Permit for Moving of Building 212.00 212.00 Building 4111 415 415.02 Subd. 3 Indemnity Deposit for Damages 530.00 530.00 unless licensed by Commissioner of Transportation Building 2605 Sustained by Moving of Building 421 421.03 R -O -W Work Annual Registration 200.00 200.00 Engineer 4341 421 421.04 R -O -W Excavation Permit Administrative 75.00 75.00 Engineer 4341 Fee Per Additional Excavation -Paved Area 35.00 35.00 Engineer 4341 Per Additional Excavation- Unpaved Area 20.00 20.00 Engineer 4341 Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 45.00 45.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Directional Boring or Tunneling (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 60.00 60.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Open Trenching (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Overhead Utility/Telecom Installation 5.00 5.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) 421 421.07 Subd. 3 Street Surface Repair 50.00 50.00 Per square foot under 10 square feet Engineer 4343 40.00 40.00 Per square foot from 10 -25 square feet Engineer 4343 35.00 35.00 Per square foot over 25 square feet Engineer 4343 430 430.03 Subd. 8 Installer's Licenses: Oil Bumer; Stoker; 55.00 55.00 Building 4117 Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; Refrigeration, and Gas Piping Installers 435 435.07 Gas Piping Permit; Oil Bumer, Stoker, Minimum Fee: Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical 22.00 22.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 Building 4115 Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4115 or Refrigeration Permit Fee Calculations: $0 to 1,000 16.00 16.00 ` plus 3.10% >$ 500 Building 4115 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 ' plus 2.60 %> $1,000 Building 4115 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 ' plus 2.15% > $ 5,000 Building 4115 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 • plus 1.85% > $10,000 Building 4115 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 ' plus 1.65% > $25,000 Building 4115 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 • plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4115 ` plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 435 435.07 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related Fees 60.00 62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is Building 4115 greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 440 440.04 Plumbing or Water Conditioning Permit Minimum Fee: 15.00 15.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 Building 4112 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Fee Calculations: $0 to 300 15.00 15.00 Building 4112 $301 to 700 15.00 15.00 . plus 1.75% >$300 Building 4112 G: \Bud ;es & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2r 18 PM City of Edina Pr. id SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20121:48 PM $701 to 1,000 22.00 22.00 * plus 3.10% >$700 Building 4112 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 * plus 2.60% > $1,000 Building 4112 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 * plus 2.15% > $5,000 Building 41 T2 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 * plus 1.85 %> $10,000 Building 4112 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 * plus 1.65% > $25,000 Building 4112 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 * plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4112 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 440 440.04 Installation or Testing of RPZ Backflow 27.00 29.00 Building 4306 Preventers 440 440.04 Subd. 1. Other Permit Related Fees 60.00 62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4306 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 445 445.08 Surcharge for Prohibited Connection to 100.00 100.00 per month Building 4391 Sanit= Sewer 450 450.05 Swimming Pool Construction Same as the fees for a building permit (See 410.02 Subd.1, fees) Building 4111 450 450.28 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Swimming Pool 470.00 470.00 per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) Health 4173 License 330.00 340.00 per year for each outdoor pool Health 4173 450 450.28 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Whirlpool Bath or 170.00 170.00 per year for each bath or pool Health 4173 Therapeutic Swimming Pool License 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Sign Permit 150.00 150.00 for reface or 50 square feet or less, plus an additional Planning 4185 3.00 3.00 per square foot for signs greater than 50 square feet. 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Courtesy Bench Sign Permit 35.00 35.00 per year Planning 4185 460 460.06 Subd 6 Sign Variance Fee 350.00 350.00 Residential Property Planning 4361 700.00 700.00 Commercial Property Planning 4361 475 475.03 Subd. 1 Parking Ramp License 125.00 125.00 per year Building 4134 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Operational permits required by MSFC 60.00 62.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4322 Section 105.6 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Non - business hours inspection 85.00 87.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. Fire 4325 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Construction permits required by MSFC Section 105.7 except for those covered in City Code Section 625 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 60.00 60.00 *minimum fee Fire 4324 501 to 2,000 60.00 60.00 * for first $500 plus Fire 4324 4.00 4.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 120.00 120.00 * for first $2,000 plus Fire 4324 16.00 16.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 488.00 488.00 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 4324 12.00 12.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 788.00 788.00 * for first $50,000 plus Fire 4324 9.00 9.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 1,238.00 1,238.00 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 4324 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 4,038.00 4,038.00 * for first $500,000 plus Fire 4324 6.00 6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 7,038.00 7,038.00 * for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 4324 5.00 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% 70% of permit fee G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20121:48 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Code Compliance Inspection 60.00 62.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4326 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Day Care Fire Inspection 50.00 50.00 Per inspection per MN Statute 245A.151 Fire 4326 615 615.03 License to Service Fire Extinguishers 100.00 100.00 per year per person licensed Fire 4325 620 620.04 Permit Fee for Cleaning Commercial 90.00 90.00 Fire 4321 Kitchen Exhaust Hood and Duct Systems 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees: Per Number of Heads: 1- 5 60.00 60.00 ' (minimum fee) Fire 4161 6- 12 90.00 90.00 • Fire 4161 13- 25 140.00 140.00 • Fire 4161 26- 50 260.00 260.00 ' Fire 4161 51- 75 340.00 340.00 ` Fire 4161 76-100 400.00 400.00 ' Fire 4161 101-125 440.00 440.00 ` Fire 4161 126-150 470.00 470.00 ` Fire 4161 151-175 510.00 510.00 ' Fire 4161 176-200 540.00 540.00 ` Fire 4161 201 plus 620.00 620.00 ` for first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire Pump Installation and Associated 255.00 255.00 Fire 4161 Hardware Dry Valve Assembly 255.00 255.00 Fire 4161 Hydrant Flow Test 110.00 110.00 Fire 4161 Standpipe Installation 160.00 160.00 Fire 4161 Each Additional Standpipe 55.00 55.00 Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & alternative fire suppression permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 60.00 60.00 'minimum fee Fire 4162 501 to 2,000 60.00 60.00 ' for first $500 plus Fire 4162 4.00 4.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 120.00 120.00 ' for first $2,000 plus Fire 4162 16.00 16.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 488.00 488.00 ' for first $25,000 plus Fire 4162 12.00 12.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 788.00 788.00 ` for first $50,000 plus Fire 4162 8.00 8.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 1,238.00 1,238.00 ' for first $100,000 plus Fire 4162 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 4,038.00 4,038.00 • for first $500,000 plus Fire 4162 6.00 6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 7,038.00 7,038.00 • for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 4162 5.00 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% 70% of permit fee 625 625.04 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 60.00 62.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4325 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 635 635.02 False Fire Alarm 300.00 300.00 Residential Fire 4323 500.00 500.00 Commercial Fire 4323 G: \Bud yes & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20 48 PM City of Edina Pro.. :d SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 640 640.02 License allowing sale of Fireworks 100.00 100.00 Per year Fire 4137 716 716.02 Recycling Service: 7.50 5.25 Per Quarter - Single Family Recycle 4640 7.50 5.25 Per Quarter - Double Bungalow Recycle 4640 7.50 5.25 Per Quarter - Apartments /Condos (2 -8 units) Recycle 4640 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Food Establishment 610.00 620.00 High risk food Health 4171 380.00 380.00 Medium risk food Health 4171 110.00 110.00 Low risk food Health 4171 150.00 155.00 Base fee Health 4171 55.00 55.00 Beer or wine table service Health 4171 130.00 130.00 Alcohol bar service Health 4171 138.00 138.00 Food vehicle Health 4171 150.00 155.00 Additional facility Health 4171 200.00 200.00 Pushcart Health 4171 120.00 120.00 Itinerant food Health 4171 15.00 15.00 Food vending machine Health 4172 721 721.03 Subd 1 Restaurant Plan Review Fee 150% of License Fee Health 4353 Restaurant Plan Review Fee for Remodel 100% of License Fee Minimum Restaurant Plan Review Fee 125.00 130.00 Health 4353 735 735.03 Lodging Establishment 8.00 9.00 per room Health 4177 Supervised Group Home 45.00 46.00 Health 4177 Boarding and Lodging House License 105.00 110.00 Health 4177 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 50.00 50.00 per single tract of land (may contain more than one building under Health 4179 same ownership) 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 90.00 90.00 per garage Health 4351 Inspection Fee 745 745.04 Subd. 2 Body Art Establishment License 300.00 300.00 Health 4137 745.07 Subd. 1 Body Art Establishment Plan Review Fee 300.00 300.00 810 810.09 Subd. 3C Neighborhood Property Owner List 1.00 1.00 per property owner name Planning 4361 810 810.09 Plat and Subdivision Filing Fee 200.00 200.00 per lot for division of one or more lots where no new buildable Planning 4361 lots are created 700.00 700.00 plus $50 /lot - all plats and subdivision other than above Planning 4361 810 810.09 Subd. 2 Developer's Agreement Fee for City 6.5% of the total construction cost of such public improvements Planning 4361 Services Rendered in Connection with Required Street, Water and Sewer Improvements 815 815.03 Antennas, Dish Antennas & Tower Same as for a building permit (See Subsection 410.02 Subd 1 fees) Building 4111 Permits 820 820.01 Filing of Application for Vacation of 450.00 450.00 Clerk 4391 Street, Alley or Easement 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Tree Removal or Grading Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Open Pit or Excavation Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2012 1:48 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV G: \Bud es & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20 48 PM $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 60.00 62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 845 845.04 Restricted Access Parking Lot License 500.00 500.00 Planning 4137 Renewals: 100.00 100.00 0 - 50 spaces Planning 4137 150.00 150.00 51 -100 spaces Planning 4137 250.00 250.00 100 - 200 spaces Planning 4137 400.00 400.00 Over 200 spaces Planning 4137 850 850.04 Subd. 2 C Variance Fee 350.00 350.00 Residential Planning 4361 600.00 600.00 Commercial Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 4 A.2 Fee for Transfer of Land to Another 500.00 500.00 (One) R -2 Lot Planning 4361 Zoning District 600.00 600.00 (Two) R -2 Lots Planning 4361 1,100.00 1,100.00 All other Transfers Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2,3,4,5 Mailed Notices 1.00 1.00 A parcel Planning 850 850.04 Subd. 5 A.1 Conditional Use Permit 800.00 800.00 Fee shall be equal to City staff time expended and City's direct Planning 4361 cost incurred in processing applications. 850 850.10 Subd. 1 D Landscaping Inspection 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 3 F Site Plan Review Fee 850.00 850.00 Planning 4361 850 850.17 Subd. 5 C.1.a Temporary Retail Sales in PID Permit 400.00 400.00 First Permit Planning 4361 300.00 300.00 Subsequent Permits Planning 4361 850 850.20 Subd. 10 Certificate of Appropriateness Planning 4361 600.00 600.00 Accessory structure and facade change 1,200.00 1,200.00 New house 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees (per year) Police 4130 300.00 300.00 Under 200 members 500.00 500.00 201 -500 members 650.00 650.00 501 -1000 members 850.00 850.00 1001 -2000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00 2001 -4000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00 4001 -6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00 over 6000 members 8,800.00 8,850.00 On -Sale Intoxicating License - Restaurants only Police 4132 660.00 670.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale Police 4130 2,000.00 2,000.00 Wine On -Sale - Restaurants only Police 4131 200.00 200.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating - Max 3 days by MS Police 4130 91.00 95.00 per event - Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Police 4130 200.00 200.00 Sunday On -Sale License - Restaurants only Police 4130 1020 1020 False Automatic Alarm 25.00 25.00 for the first response per calendar year Police 4332 110.00 110.00 for the 2nd thru 4th response within one calendar year Police 4332 200.00 200.00 for the 5th and subsequent false alarm within one calendar year Police 4332 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit 22.00 25.00 Clerk 4137 1045 1045.05 Variance Fee RV's, Boats, etc. Storage 50.00 50.00 Planning 4361 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment G: \Bud es & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20 48 PM City of Edina Pro, ad SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2012 1:48 PM Buildings Containing Four or Less 49.28 51.20 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 3.08 3.20 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 44.35 46.08 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 3.08 3.20 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 49.28 51.20 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 3.08 3.20 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 3 Industrial User Extra Strength Charges As allocated to City by Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 4.A Shutting Off or Turning On Curb Water For each turn -on and each shut -off. Finance 4628 Stops at Customer's Request or Due to Non - payment of Bill 35.00 35.00 1100 1100.04 subd. 1.A Fee for Alternative Water Meter Reading 20.00 Per quarter Finance 4626 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below Finance 4626 1.24 1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet 1.64 1.74 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet 2.58 2.73 Over 6500 cubic feet 2.36 2.44 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area Finance 4626 Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.24 1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 1.64 1.74 Over 3500 cubic feet Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.64 1.74 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 2.58 2.73 Over 3500 cubic feet Meter Charge: 15.07 15.97 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 20.54 21.77 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 23.43 24.84 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 26.36 27.94 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 42.44 44.99 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 161.18 170.85 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 205.16 217.47 Per quarter for 4 inch meter Finance 4627 275.59 Per quarter for 6 inch meter Finance 4627 349.99 Per quarter for 8 inch meter Finance 4627 Flat Annual Charges as Follows: - Park Department for water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Finance 4626 - Street Department for water used for flushing street Finance 4626 1105 1105.01 Subd. 1 Service Availability Charge (SAC) 2,365.00 2,435.00 Per SAC unit X number of SAC units computed pursuant to Subsection Building 4307 1105.01, Subd, 1 of this code 1105 1105.02 Charge for Connection to City Water or 840.00 860.00 Water connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units Engineer 4116 Sewer System 420.00 430.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 20.56 21.59 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 1115 1115.03 Water Surcharges Surcharges for violation of the Irrigation Bans are determined based on the number of water restriction violations issued to an owner in the previous three years and are as follows: First Offense Written warning Second Offense 50.00 50.00 Third Offense 100.00 100.00 Fourth Offense 200.00 200.00 Each Additional Offense 300.00 300.00 1205 1205.01 Curb Cut Permit 40.00 40.00 Engineer 4344 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk Cafe Permit 650.00 650.00 Clerk 4137 1230.08 Temporary Liquor License Special Permit 320.00 320.00 Per event Clerk 4137 1230 1230.10 Off -leash Dog Park 25.00 25.00 Resident G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2012 1:48 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2012 2013 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV G: \Bud )es & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2r 18 PM 50.00 50.00 Non - Resident 1235 1235.03 Subd. 2 Parking Permit 5.00 5.00 per month pro -rated Police 4751 Refund Parking Permit - Sticker Must 5.00 5.00 per month pro -rated Police 4751 Be Returned 1300 1300.02 Subd. 1 Refuse or Recycling Hauler's License 300.00 300.00 per year for 1 st vehicle Health 4178 95.00 95.00 per year for each additional vehicle Health 4178 1311 1311.03 Peddler /Solicitor Permit 30.00 30.00 per permit - valid for 14 calendar days Police 4128 1311.04 Subd. 1 Registration for Peddling /Soliciting 50.00 50.00 per registration - valid for 90 calendar days Police 4128 1325 1325.03 Tobacco Sale License 365.00 370.00 per location Health 4170 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage Therapists 18.00 20.00 Per therapist for those businesses exempt from licensure Clerk 4137 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health Service or 290.00 295.00 Business License Clerk 4137 Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 1341 1341.05 Investigation Fee - Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 Clerk 4314 1345 1345.05 Subd. 1 Sexually- oriented Business License 5,000.00 5,000.00 per ear Clerk 4137 1345 1345.05 Subd. 2 Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 At time of original application Clerk 4137 1350 1350.06 Subd. 1 Commercial Photography 33.00 35.00 Manager Permit - Still Photography Clerk 4133 128.00 130.00 Manager Permit - Motion Photography Clerk 4133 360.00 362.00 Council Permit Clerk 4133 1400 1400.2 Truck Restrictive Road Permit 100.00 100.00 Engineer 4190 1410 1410.01 Redemption of Impounded Vehicle Fee as posted in Police Department Police 4334 G: \Bud )es & Charges\2013 Fees & Charges\2013 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2r 18 PM CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 26 FUND: GENERAL I REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED TAXES: PROPERTYTAXES $19,712,348 $20,405,035 $21,004,000 $21,004,000 $21,604,402 $21,989,994 PENALTIES AND INTEREST 20,180 39,552 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS - - (147,000) (327,000) (122,000) (125,000) 19,732,528 20,444,587 20,869,000 20,689,000 21,494,402 21,876,994 TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES FRANCHISE FEES 667,791 692,288 700,000 650,000 700,000 714,000 20,400,31 21,136,875 21 569 000 21 339 000 22,194,402 22,590,994 TOTAL TAXES LICENSE AND PERMITS: HEATNENT LICENSE 26,235 29,315 30,000 30,000 30,000 31,000 BUILDING PERMITS 1,217,654 1,427,857 1,575,000 1,421,990 1,590,000 1,640,000 PLUMBING PERMITS 124,114 122,848 125,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 HEATING PERMITS 23,360 25,981 45,000 10,000 15,000 18,000 MECHANICAL PERMITS 264,097 283,919 270,000 270,000 275,000 280,000 GRADING /EXCAVATION PERMITS 5,192 3,471 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 DOG LICENSES 40,535 59,492 50,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 BEER LICENSE 10,642 12,429 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 WINE LICENSE 15,075 19,667 22,000 25,000 24,000 25,000 LIQUOR LICENSE 145,083 151,570 165,000 142,000 155,000 160,000 PARKING RAMP 3,375 3,500 3,500 3,300 3,400 3,500 OTHER PERMITS & LICENSES 7,386 7,536 3,500 3,000 3,500 3,600 SPRINKLER PERMITS 23,017 29,579 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,500 ALARM PERMITS 11,509 15,149 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 TOBACCO LICENSE 5,600 5,840 5,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE 96,472 106,907 105,000 95,000 97,000 100,000 FOOD VENDING LICENSE 1,125 1,695 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 POOL LICENSE 26,052 25,125 25,000 24,000 24,200 25,000 AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE 1,695 1,365 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,600 LODGING LICENSE 931 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSE 11,435 19,075 11,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 PARKING GARAGE LICENSE 4,005 4,546 4,000 3,200 3,500 3,800 SIGN PERMIT 11,730 18,613 17,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 ROAD RESTRICTION PERMITS 4,820 8,462 10,000 20,000 15,000 '15,000 2,081,139 2,383,941 2,529,000 2,309,490 2,501,600 2,577 500 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID: FEDERALAID 104,906 21,442 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 STATE AID MAINTENANCE 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 OTHER STATE AID 126,973 109,645 120,000 51,000 60,000 60,000 STATE POLICE AID 338,684 332,572 340,000 355,000 350,000 350,000 STATE HEALTH AID 119,086 119,035 120,000 120,000 119,000 119,000 884,649 777,694 811,000 757,000 760,000 760,000 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENT AID CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 27 FUND: GENERAL I REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED TUMUWD BUDGETED BUDGETED CHARGES FOR SERVICES: BUILDING DEPARTMENT $ 29,132 $ 23,997 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 CITY CLERK 8,862 97,429 10,000 6,000 76,000 6,500 FIRE DEPARTMENT 31,237 22,683 20,000 30,000 20,000 20,000 AMBULANCE 1,556,146 1,648,575 1,700,000 1,545,000 1,638,000 1,720,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 172,878 183,568 300,000 200,000 260,000 270,000 ENGINEERING 210,071 155,524 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 6,580 12,933 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 16,536 24,857 20,000 27,500 25,000 25,000 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT 37,870 35,748 30,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 SERVICES HRA 28,377 21,812 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 PARK REGISTRATION FEES 103,530 112,048 103,000 98,000 100,000 105,000 SENIOR CENTER FEES 94,525 90,636 90,000 98,000 98,000 98,000 COMMUNICATIONS DEPT 101,679 76,383 66,500 66,500 70,000 74,000 OTHER FEES 1,540 1,090 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 50TH & FRANCE ASSESSMENT 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS 392,880 393,168 395,604 395,604 474,564 484,044 2,860,843 2 969 451 3,042,804 2 800 304 3,096,264 3138 244 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE FINES AND FORFEITURES: MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 1,148,440 1,162,973 1,025,000 975,000 1,014,000 1,034,000 OTHER REVENUES: INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 58,220 138,287 139,919 139,919 128,800 161,000 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 191,136 270,333 245,000 200,000 240,000 255,000 PARK RENTAL 151,310 154,672 125,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 DONATIONS 28,367 28,798 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 15,039 2,789 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 444,072 594,879 527,919 482,919 516,800 574,000 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES TOTAL REVENUE $27,819,462 $29,025,813 $29,504,723 $28 663 713 $30 083 066 $30 674 738 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM LIQUOR 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $28,584,562 $29,790,913 $30,269,823 $29,428,813 $30,848,166 $31,439,838 ORDINANCE NO. 2012-22 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: SEC- SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF AMOUNT TION FEEXHARGE 200 200.04 Public Dance Permit $55.00 225 225.04 Special Events Application $65.00 Fee 300 300.03 Subd. 3 Dog License $30.00 per dog $20.00 per neutered do 410 410.02 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees $62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 435 435.07 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related Fees $62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 440 440.04 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related Fees $62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Swimming Pool License $340.00 per year for each outdoor pool 605 605.05 Subs.1 Operational permits required $62.00 per hour with a minimum 1 hour by MSFC Section 105.6 fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections overhead, hourly wages and fringe Non - business hours benefits of employees involved) inspection $87.00 per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Code Compliance Inspection $62.00 per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 625 625.04 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees $62.00 per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 716 716.02 Recycling Service $5.25 Per Quarter - Single Family $5.25 Per Quarter - Double Bungalow $5.25 Per Quarter - A artments /Condos 2 -8 units 721 721.03 Subd 1 Food Establishment $620.00 High risk food $155.00 Base fee $155.00 Additional facility 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Minimum Restaurant Plan $130.00 Review Fee 735 735.03 Lodging Establishment $9.00 per room Supervised Group Home $46.00 Boarding and Lodging House $110.00 License 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees $62.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees (per year) $8,850.00 On -Sale intoxicating License - Restaurants only $670.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale $95.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit $25.00 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Sewer Service: 1. Single Family, Town $51.20 Per quarter to and including 1600 Houses, Two - Family cubic feet Dwellings, Apartment building $3.20 Additional from 1601 cubic feet with four or less dwelling units and over 2. Apartment building with $46.08 Per qtr for each unit over four or more than four dwelling units. $3.20 per 100 c.f. of water used, whichever is greater 3. Commercial and industrial 51.20 Per water meter or approved buildings, including schools sewage metering device on premises, or and churches $3.20 per 100 c.f. of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Water Service: 1. Per 100 cubic feet for $1.31 up to 3500 c.f. areas of City, except areas $1.74 3600 to 6500 c.f. described in #2 below: $2.73 over 6500 c.f. 2. Morningside area $2.44 per 100 cubic feet 3. Domestic accounts used $1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet by commercial and industrial $1.74 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 4. Lawn watering accounts $1.74 Up to 3500 cubic feet used by commercial and $2.73 Over 3500 cubic feet Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2013. First Reading Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen -City Clerk 3 James B. Hovland -Mayor industrial buildings, including schools and churches. 5. Meter charge $15.97 /quarter for up to % inch meter $21.77 /quarter for 1 inch meter $24.84 /quarter for 1 % inch meter $27.94 /quarter for 1 % inch meter $44.99 /quarter for 2 inch meter $170.85 /quarter for 3 inch meter $217.47 /quarter for 4 inch meter $275.59 /quarter.for 6 inch meter $349.99/ uarterfor 8 inch meter 1100 1100.04 Subd. Fee for Alternative Water $20.00 per quarter 1 Meter Reading 11105 1105.02 Service Availability Charge $2,435.00Per SAC `unit X number of SAC (SAC) units computed pursuant to Subsection 1105.01 subd. 1 of this,code 1105 1105.02 Charge for Connection to City $860.00 Water connection charge per Water or Sewer System REC unit X number of SAC units $430.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage $21.59 Per quarter pursuant to formula Char a in Subsection 11.10.03 1325 1325.03 Tobacco Sale License $370.00 per location 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage $20.00 Per therapist for those Therapists businesses exempt from licensure 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health $295.00 Business License Service or Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna. Parlor; Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 1350 1350.06 Subd.. °Commercial Photography $35.00 Manager Permit -Still 1 Photography .$130.00 Manager Permit- Motion Photography $362.00 Council Permit Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2013. First Reading Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen -City Clerk 3 James B. Hovland -Mayor To: Mayor and Council Members From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 4, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. No action is requested. rocs Le ', ) U) Agenda Item #: IX. A. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information D� f,P7� r 1� ��J��/.v. Jul �i✓�- 3'd9eJ.`�o� . Susan Howl From: Brian Olson Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:47 AM To: 'kathy.r.frey @gmail.com' Cc: Susan Howl; Jeff Long; James Hovland Subject: RE: Contact Us form submission Dear Ms. Frey, First of all, let me start by saying that I apologize for the interaction that you had with the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department takes pride in the service level that it provides to the residents of this community. You were the first person that made Public Works aware of this accident and concern about debris in the street. I have informed my Street Supervisor to get the intersection swept and notify and the County about the road signs that were hit. Thank you for providing the information. The intersection will be swept before noon. Sincerely, Brian Brian Olson, Public Works Director (Ca? _ 952 - 826 -0311 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 bolson(cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov iN ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:55 AM To: Brian Olson Cc: Susan Howl; Jeff Long Subject: FW: Contact Us form submission Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Jeff Long and Brian Olson. '> �' -•;:. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cbEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: mail(a)EdinaMN.gov [mailto:mail(aEdinaMN.gov1 Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:47 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Kathy Frey Organization: Website: Address 1: 1 Address 2: 6021 Killarney Lane City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55436 Email: kathy.r.freyggmail.com Phone: 952- 412 -3515 Referrer: google Message: Dear City of Edina, This morning, 11/27/12, on my way to work there was a most-unfort unate situation that occurred near the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen. Obviously there had just been a major . accident because all of the signs in the island on Vernon were flattened. I didn\'t realize it until it was too late, but as I was taking a left onto Interlachen from Vernon, I (and hundreds of other people in other cars) drove over piles of large shards of glass, broken plastic and sharp pieces of metal. No cop car, no lights, no public works, no one was there helping and directing vehicles around this mess. So I called the non - emergent police number and reported the problem. The dispatcher on duty replied by saying, \"Oh, that is not our job. That would be public works.\" So I asked her why they hadn \'t been notified, thought it odd that a commuter should have to do this, but asked to be connected to public works. Public works answered and replied, \"Oh, it is near the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen? That is not our job. That is the county \'s job\". At this point, I am now at work. There is a strong possibility that I will have flat tires as will hundreds of other cars and trucks who were at that intersection this morning. This is unacceptable. I have left a message with the chief of police, (he is out of town but hopefully I will hear from his deputy) and the mayor. What are our tax dollars for - if- -not this? 2 Hein de Hoog 7215 Glouchester Dr Edina, MN. 55435 November 28, 2012 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50t' Street Edina, MN 55424 Good Morning Mr. Hovland, Enclosed please find my payment in the amount $7,086.57 for the recent street "repair" done on Glouchester Drive, where I own a duplex. Please be advised that not only am I not happy with the cost of the repair, I am even less happy with the process that resulted in the decision to make the repair and how this was presented to the community. The below list of issues I have are off of memory and the amounts and course of events won't be correct, but not too far off to alter the truth of what actually occurred. The initial letter sent to the community was a generic letter indicating that the cost per household would be approximately $12,000. This letter was chuck full of information that was not correct or relevant to our street. When this amount was later revised to items relevant for our street it was reduced to approximately $5,000 per household. I believe the city used a scare tactic. Hit the owner with an over the top large amount and then when the amount is scaled back to a not as large amount, there will be less resistance. So my point is that the manner and accuracy in which this was done was very poor. Even the write up on the work that needed to be done on our street had many material errors and included things not relevant to our street. When I talked to city personal in private and pointed this out, I was told that I was correct about the inaccuracies yet at the council meeting when I brought this up and you questioned the same city personnel, it was brushed over saying a random item may be slightly over stated but nothing was materially incorrect. This second response at the meeting couldn't be further from the truth. So my point is how could the answer be different in private than in public and how much duress are city employees under to tell it the way the council wants to hear it? Of the "real" work that needed to be done, much of this could be accomplished without tearing up the street. The only remaining substantial concerns was a water main on one of the cul -de -saks that was not large enough. There were no registered complaints from the residence on this street indicating a lack of water pressure or requesting this to be upgraded. Additionally there was a patch of about twenty feet by twenty feet where the top layer of asphalt was letting go. This was also in one of the cul- de-saks. Yes, a bit unsightly, but again, no registered complaints. So my point is that even though there was "real" work that needed to be done, it was in a cul- de -sak and only affected the residents there, here, not any other residents or the city at large. Many of the residents indicated that the condition of the street was actually very good. Granted this is an opinion but nonetheless, that is how they felt about their own street. The city hired a company to make a professional assessment of the streets condition and the approximate score out of 100 points was 36. This left little room for negotiation because it was "professionals" versus opinion. Well not exactly. Again, in speaking with your. city employee prior to the council meeting I asked about alternative maintenance and we discussed a gravel spray that could. be put down at a cost to the city of approximately $50,000. At the city council meeting a man who worked for the city of Minneapolis in street repair gave all sorts of data and information about testing he had done to soil in his neighborhood some thirty years ago prior to buying and building. As, l recall, he said that we would be hard pressed to build a more solid road bed for asphalt than what was already there and that there was no reason to tear anything up from a wear stand point,-it actually couldn't be built any better. So my point here is that even "professionals" have different "opinions" based on knowledge they have and that residents uneducated in the field of street repair may still have a valid point when they say our streets are fine. Furthermore, who has who in their back pocket and why would a professional assessment company rate a streets condition so much worse than what a common sense opinion would offer. Is there a payoff for them ? ?? A petition had been presented to the city where nearly eighty percent of the residents affected by the "repair" indicated they were not in favor of the project. The motion was moved by Josh Sprague under the pretense that the council was responsible for the infrastructure of the city". I say pretense because the infrastructure in question was a horse shoe and two cul -de -saks. These streets are not used by the city at large, only the residents that were questioning the need for the "repair". The streets are in no Way a thorough fares or thru streets. If my memory serves me correctly, then the mission of the council is to represent the residents. So my point here is that I believe the very residents that the council was supposed to be representing, they didn't. Mr. Hovland, I know I have left out much detail. Furthermore, I can go in with many more examples, but clearly this letter is long enough already. I have several points I still wish to make, and I will be direct. 1 attempted to make my points at the council meeting but the three minutes allowed are hardly adequate. Between myself and the others that spoke that night I believe 5 of the 6 requested this project be table offering an opportunity for further conversation and study. A gentleman there that night even spoke saying he wasn't involved in a street repair issue but that tabling it was a great idea. The council wouldn't have it. What a shame and what was the council scared.of?. Why couldn't it be discussed further? If we as residents are responsible for "re. pair", then-so be it, we should pay for the repair. 'But if the city is responsible for'upkeep and upkeep is still a possibility, then they should pay for it. The problem with the way it is set up now is that the same people responsible for the upkeep (city) have the authority to shrug their duty and pass it off to someone else (residents). Cleary the council decided that no matter what, this project was going to pass and that no residents objections or request for further conversation would influence the decision. Shame on the council for not listening to the people that elected them and shame on you for not offering better. leadership to the council. If I lead my business' in this way I wouldn't have employees worth having and if I spent unnecessary money like this in my business, I wouldn't make it in business. This project was a terrible waste of natural resources and money! How unfortunate that you had no "real" opposition for the mayors seat in the last election. In my humble opinion your opponent didn't merit nearly the number of votes she received and that they were cast not in favor of her, but in opposition to you. And my vote would be one of them. Don't be so heavy handed and listen to your constituents. A very disgruntled Edema resident, Cc; Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, Ann Swenson Susan Howl From: Wayne Houle Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:48 PM To: 'bethhkehoe @gmail.com' Cc: Susan Howl; Lynette Biunno; Bob Wilson Subject: RE: Attn City Council and Engineering Ms. Kehoe: After reading your email I wanted to be sure that you knew that you do have choices for payment of the special assessment. I have copied and pasted below from the special assessment policy the different choices for repayment. They essentially are: 1. Pay the entire balance, which I believe you are doing. 2. Don't pay or partially pay'the special assessment and let the remaining balance be spread out over 15 years. 3. Defer payment through the Senior Deferral Program — contact the Assessing Department at 952- 826 -0365 to see if you are eligible for this program. I do realize that you were not asking how to repay the assessment, but rather stating that this is a burden on residents. I have not seen any proposals that would change this policy for future projects. Please contact me if you any questions regarding the special assessments. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering Imo' I 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 -826-0392 t r r WHoule @EdinaMN.gov 1 tinnrw.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 6. Repayment Periods: Repayment period for special assessments levied by the City of Edina vary depending on the purpose for which the assessment was levied: Repayment periods and terms are as follows: a. Maximum Repayment Periods i. Local roadway reconstruction - l5 years. ii. Sound walls — 15 yeas. iii. Garbage and debris removal, aquatic weeds, weed mowing, and maintenance districts — 1 year. iv. Tree removals -I year if under $500, 2 years if $500 to $1000, and 3 years if over $1000. v. Underground utility line replacements - 15 years. vi. Sump pump removal or redirection — 5 years b. Assessment Interest Rate —The interest rate for a special assessment shall be 1% higher than the estimated "net interest" rate of the bonds to be issued for the project. If a bond is not issued for a project then the interest rate shall be 1% higher than the net interest rate of the most recent bonds sold by the City prior to ordering the public improvement. The interest rates for 6. a. iii., 6. a. iv., 6. a. v., and 6. a. vi. shall be 6.5% C. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before certifying the assessment to the County. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment: d. The City shall inform all property owners received a special assessment of the City's Senior Deferral Program. e. Payments shall be amortized using a level annual payment schedule. From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:32 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attn City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1.} , Ibiunno(a)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Beth Kehoe [mailto•bethhkehoe(agmail,.coml Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 10:55 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Beth Kehoe Subject: Attn City Council and Engineering To Whom it May Concern,. It is with a sad heart and sick stomach that I sit here writing my check for my street assessment. It is neither something I requested, nor something I feel was necessary at this time. With the economy as it is, the time for this surprise work couldn't be worse. Yes, maybe my neighbors needed help with the drainage on the pond near me. Yes, maybe we had a few potholes on our street. Yes, a coating of asphalt may have been important. And yes, maybe that could have all been done at a time when families are getting raises at work that help them keep up with the raises in taxes and inflation. Now is not that time. It is simply sickening that we are being charged $12,379.41 right now. It is an enormous amount at any time for a middle class family. It is an ever bigger amount at this time in history. It is simply a disgrace that this type of bill would just show up in the mail one day. This day of payment has been making me and my husband sick for the last year and now the time has come to pay for it. What is even worse, is that there is now a discussion going on that maybe these surprise letters to families that they owe astronomical bills will cease to happen. That is great to hear. However, why must we bear this entire burden now? If it isn't right for future families, why is right for us, right now? The answer is, it simply isn't. We moved to Edina for a number of reasons. We pay our mortgage on time. We pay our taxes. We celebrate the city. But this type of assessment is more than a black spot on Edina's reputation. I1 is unthinkable. If, in the future, the city chooses to eliminate this type of assessment, it would be nice if families who have had to bear this burden at this time of economic hardship, would receive a refund of some or all back. Now, with a heavy heart and empty bank account, I submit my payment. Beth Kehoe 5613 Sherwood Ave Edina, MN 55424 LA L> Co � 11 A w_ S LV ' 1 Ju- ilIjIA �a November 7, 2012 Dr. Donald Geesaman 4606 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Dear Professor Geesaman: I am in receipt of your November 3rd letter. It was civil and well written. I hope you judge my response to be the same. As you might guess, the City has received a great deal of feedback on the Wooddale Avenue bike lanes, most of it negative. We have received many comments, like yours, that are not only critical of the bike lane design, but also skeptical about its need. Regarding the design of the street markings, the City consulted with transportation engineering authorities to produce a bike lane plan that meets state and federal design requirements. The bike lane design is new to Edina, and to Minnesota, so it is true that most drivers are not familiar with the new street markings right now. However, the bike lane markings you see on Wooddale Avenue will become more common in the future. I have personally observed a sea change in the manner In which drivers have learned how to navigate roundabouts in Minnesota. I believe that drivers will also learn, in time, to successfully and routinely navigate bike lanes as well. Judging the need for the bike lanes is another question entirely. I happen to be composing this letter to you on Election Day. This day Is significant to me because it is a stark reminder for me of my place in the leadership hierarchy of city government. As the City Manager for the City of Edina, I work for the elected officials that are selected by the citizens of Edina. They do not work for me, and that's as it should be. I accept their judgment about what are and are not Important issues in Edina because they are the legitimately elected leaders of the community. I advise them on issues, and I have a large degree of control over how issues are addressed, but they largely determine what important issues are addressed by city government. The Inclination of our City Council here In Edina — which is much the same as City Councils anywhere in America - is to be responsive to citizens who express needs and ask for help. Council Members have many constituents who tell them that bike lanes and sidewalks are Important. The Council believes that Edina's future will be better if we improve the pedestrian and biking Infrastructure today. I am sure you must understand that for Council Members to be responsive to their constituents who are demanding more and better biking facilities in Edina, they must, by definition be less responsive to constituents who believe that bike lane spending is unnecessary. This is the central conundrum of elected officials at all levels of government. I do not have a solution for it, just enough firsthand experience with it to assure you that it is as frustrating for the governing as it is the governed. 5HN /sh S' rely, Scott H. Neal City Manager CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina. Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 . Fax 952- 826 -0390 Swim Team November 26, 2012 Mr. John Keprios Edina Parks & Recreation Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Edina Aquatic Center Lease Renewal Request . Dear John: am writing this letter on behalf of the Aquajet Swim Team to respectfully request the opportunity to renew our lease of the Edina Aquatic Center. As you know, we have been an appreciative lessee of the Edina Aquatic Center for the past 8 years. Over this time period, we have gained the favor of the Aquatic Center staff by treating the facility as if it were our own. Bill Moir, the Edina Aquatic Center Facility Manager, has often expressed his appreciation for the way the Aquajets have maintained the facility - stating "the Aquajets always leave the pool in better condition than when we arrived." The Aquajets have approximately 350 swimmers on our team with a large portion of those swimmers living in the southwest metro area. Of the 350 swimmers, over 81 swimmers or approximately 22.4% of our team reside or go to school in Edina, just below the number of swimmers from Eden Prairie at 90 or 24.9 %. Our team has experienced unprecedented success over the last three or four years. In the past year, we are proud to have had two swimmers compete in the 2012 London Olympics - Rachel Bootsma, who earned a gold medal for the USA Olympic Team and Heather Arseth on the Mauritius Olympic Team. In addition, the Aquajets have set multiple national records and continue to be a "Gold Medal" designated team through USA Swimming. The "Gold Medal" designation recognizes the Aquajets for our success in promoting the development of a strong, well- rounded swim program that produces elite 18 & under athletes. A big part of our team's success is a result of being able to swim in facilities like the Edina Aquatic Center. Over the next 30 days, we would like to renew our permit for leasing the Edina Aquatic Center with similar terms as last year. We look forward to our discussions. If you should.have any questions, please feel free to call 'Joel Anderson at 952 -406 -2744 or me at 612- 360 -7454. Respectfully, Steven Foster Aquajets President cc: Mr. Richard Hovland — Edina Mayor Mr. Scott Neal =Edina City Manager Mr. Joel Anderson — Aquajets Board Member rrar r1..:..._./'1 —. 4 r),;•,o tr ,)rn I Friph Prnirie- Minnesota 55344 952- 351 -9928 Aquajets.com �`==^ ____.- — ' —._— - -- Susan Howl From: Lynette oiunnv on behalf vf Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November uo.o01o9:uoAM Cc: Susan Howl avodem: pW: Wild and Wooly GLP Lynette 0immnm.Receptionist 952*27*861 | Fax ooz*oo-0noo | —For Living, Learning, Raising Faniffies & Doing Business ��_��'�� From: Erik Hinkle Sent, Friday, November 3O'2O129;2SAM To: Edina Mail Subject: Wild and Wooly SLP Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, Today l am embarrassed to live in Edina. The comments made hy you, your staff, and the Edina City council rc8mdin8SLP'o "bar town" and the "wild and wooly" West End are way off base and do nothing but feed into negative stereotypes about Edina. It is astonishing that in 2012 Edina is od|| concerned about the percentage oy liquor served in restaurants. Moving tou5O'5Oratio isn't going to turn 50dh and France into u seedy, tenuous environment for families. What it will doie support un expanding base oyhigh quality establishments that are trying to compete for business from families like mine that have plenty uf options in close proximity outside o[Edina. What did you hope to accomplish hy insulting the mayor ofSL9and it's residents? I'm already hearing hom friends in GLP that are angered hy your oommenm. They take great pride in their city, as they should. VVe need to create u business friendly environment that will bring new restaurants into Edina- not encourage them to set up shop in SLP because of a puritanical, mis-informed, and unfriendly approach to managing alcohol. GrikHinkie . Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:47 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attn: City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 9527927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 _. lbiunno(@EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families& Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rick Hammond (mailto:hammond(@mac.coml Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:36 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering I am writing about the roadway improvements for Lake Edina Neighborhood that seems like a breach of fiduciary trust. My concern is the initial estimates were half of the new $12,500 assessment estimates, which does little for my trust in the City of Edina. The new dollar amount is truly unacceptable. Like many families over the past few years we have had both job and financial struggles, but we kept our family together and have been able to keep our home. You are assigning us a huge financial obligation for new curbs and asphalt on our street, which seems incredibly bloated. What else must my family give up? Please reconsider your choices. We are prepared to tighten our belts for the $6,000+ our friends in other parts of Edina paid to have their streets re -done. Otherwise honestly let the road continue to deteriorate, because a roof over our head is where I would rather put our money. Sincerely, Rick ----------------- - - - - -- Rick L. Hammond Mobile: 612 - 804 -5931 Email: hammond@mac.com -------------------------------- - - - - -- Susan Howl Subject: RE: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Mike and Sandi, Thank you for taking time to share your concerns regarding the Federal Aviation Administration's proposed changes in flight paths around Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport in order to implement performance -based navigation here. As you know, the FAA in September asked the Metropolitan Airports Commission board to endorse the plan this month. Based on extensive input from community leaders and airport neighbors like you, the MAC board on Nov. 19 voted to approve the FAA's plan exce t for departures on runways 30L and 30R. If the FAA moves forward with partial implementation of performance -based navigation as recommended by the MAC, that will mean that communities to the south and east will realize the benefits of performance -based navigation — enhanced safety, fewer aircraft emissions and less noise over many populated areas — while those to the north and west of the airport will not experience the changes in departure flight paths that would have resulted from the FAA's proposal. It remains unclear at this time whether or when the FAA will move forward with the partial implementation supported by the MAC board. Decisions regarding where and how aircraft can fly are determined solely by the FAA, not by the Metropolitan Airports Commission or other airport authorities. Regardless; we are confident the FAA will not implement performance -based navigation for departures off of runways 30L and 30R — toward Richfield Minneapolis and Edina -- at this time. Again, thank you for sharing your concerns with the Metropolitan Airports Commission. MAC board members fully considered input from community leaders and citizens, and the action the board took on Nov. 19 reflects that input. Patrick From: Genau, Mike [mai Ito: mike genau medtronic.coml Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:16 PM To: Hogan, Patrick Cc: mailCcbEdinaMN.gov Subject: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Mr. Hogan, We recently read the information on the proposed changes in air traffic for flights landing and departing from Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport and we have to say that the process the Commission and FAA is using does not appear to be fair or fully vetted. We are new to the area and are in the process of buying a home in Edina. With this news, we will likely walk away from our contract, thus losing our significant earnest money, as we feel we have no choice. The risk L property devaluation is too great. We like the area and felt it would be a good investment, and that the quality of life would be very good, as well. But, the proposed changes in flight patterns will have a SIGNIFICANT, negative impact on any real- estate investment inlEdina and the quality of life will suffer. Surely you are hearing from many people who are upset with the way this has been handled. The apparent lack of concern for the people of Edina is alarming. - At this time, we are not in favor of the proposed changes to the MSP flights and request that the vote scheduled for Monday be postponed and that the changes not be recommended to the FAA. Perhaps, after a more thorough evaluation of the ramifications of the changes, our opinion will change. We expect the same courtesy, consideration and involvement as all the other communities who are affected and do not appreciate the seemingly non4ransparent way this has been handled. Respectfully, Mike & Sandi Genau Cc: MayorJames Hovland [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the r individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http• / /emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com z Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:15 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl; Chad Millner FW: Attn City Council and Engineering - Road improvement NO BA -392 Subject: Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Wayne Houle and Chad Millner. - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist (C 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doug; Business From: rickwindharn0bg -com rmailto•rickwindham @Q.coml Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:09 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn City Council and Engineering - Road improvement NO BA -392 I was just reviewing the improvement proposed for my neighborhood and see that the part of Mendelsson east of Blake road is not included. Since all roads between Blake and Interlachen CC, except Mendelsson, are included why would the one street be left out? It would seem to have that improvement done as a small project would be very expensive and if the planned project had more houses included the cost of our project might be less per household. Can you please share the rational for this design. Rick Windham 952 - 938 -8591 1 ---------- Susan Howl Name: Steve Carlson Organization: Website: Address-1: 4530 Casco Ave Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip—Code: 55424 Email: leocarlson(2msn.com Phone: 952-926-1123 Referrer: Message: We would like to thank Jim Hovland and Scott Neal for jumping into,the MAC\'s takeoff/landing routes proposal, that would have been so harmful to Edina residents. THANK YOU! THANK YOU! We appreciate your energy and your effectiveness. Thank you also for staying on top of this issue. Best regards, Steve and Cathy Carlson I Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:38 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: 50th and France parking Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f?i 1I . 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 L... f ,. Ibiunno(c- EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov �. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Christine Braun jmailto: stork. mnO)gmail.coml Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 50th and France parking Dear Mr. Hovland, I am writing to convey my extreme displeasure with the parking situation at 50th and France. You have developed this area to draw consumers to your city and now you are driving us away with the parking situation. I have been a frequent shopper in your city. Last week I received a $42 parking citation for parking more than two hours in the ramp while shopping more than two hours and spending hundreds of dollars in this neighborhood. I will not be returning to shop in your city again until you fix the parking situation. Consumers should be rewarded and not penalized for staying longer and shopping more. Currently this is not an option in your city. Sincerely, Christine Braun a Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail ent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:40 AM .:c: Susan Howl FW: with the mayors at Edina Morningside Community Church Subject: meeting Lynette Biunno,- Receptionist rli 952 - 927 - 8861.1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ()EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov -' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: David Frenkel Lmailto:frenkelCcbatt.netl Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:57 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Steve Kirchman; feglaw gmailxom; Edina Mail Subject: meeting with the mayors at Edina Morningside Community Church Dear Mayor Hovland, I had to leave the meeting early tonight at Edina Morningside Community Church before residential redevelopment issues may have been discussed. There are certainly issues around appropriate residential development in Edina but my biggest concern is the lack of oversight both by the city and the developer at a property being developed next to my house. I have been in constant contact with city agencies and police over the past few months over a variety of road related violations including dumping of construction materials on the street, illegal parking, blocking my driveway and blocking streets. I have young children and their safety is my primary responsibility and the primary concern of the developer is to maximize their profits and these 2 goals are clashing at the development at 4511 Golf Terrace. The city of Edina needs to better regulate, monitor and fine developers for violating city and federal safety codes. Having lived in other comparably sized suburbs in Seattle and Washington, DC I have plenty of suggestions on how to rein in developers who do not play by the rules and do not put safety first. Thank you. Regards, David Frenkel 4510 Lakeview Drive 612 - 237 -1966 1 i Susan Howl Hello I was flipping channels tonight and saw the council meeting where there was discussion of a possible indoor domed sports facility in Edina. I know very little about your current plans but I thought you might be interested in the following; Several years ago (5 -6 years) there were meetings with the soccer and the baseball board presidents, as well as some representatives from Park and Recreation which was looking at the possibility of a domed sport facility. At that time, as a member of the baseball board, I noted I had a friend who was interested in this project. His name was Cyril Silberman and his company, Uni- Systems is based in Minneapolis. http: / /www.uni- systems.com/ "Uni- Systems, LLC is'a design, construction, and consultation engineering firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota specializing in kinetic architecture, or movable, mechanized structures designed to adapt to individual structures' needs. The firm has become particularly recognized for its design and installation of retractable roof systems on various sports stadiums across the United States;m Uni- Systems has been involved in the construction of five of the seven sports stadiums incorporating retractable roofs in North http: / /en wikipedia orq /wiki /Uni-Svstems America since 1999. " Mr Silberman, who is the company's president, did his own aerial studies of Edina putting together a topographical map looking for both the best location as well as the most economical approach based on multiple factors. He was doing this as a friend to myself, as well as out of interest in helping communities develop such venues. He attended one of the meetings, put together the above initial proposals, and if Im not mistaken gave them to Park and Recreation for their study. I dont believe he ever heard back from them, and the discussions lost steam. I have not spoken to Mr Silberman about this for several years, but it might be worth your while locating his original studies and recommendations ( Im thinking perhaps Mr Keprios or Mr MacHolda might still have them). Uni- Systems is a remarkable company - and you may also want to re- establish contact with Mr Silberman directly as you evaluate various facility options. Thanks Paul Bearmon Susan Howl Hello I was flipping channels tonight and saw the council meeting where there was discussion of a possible indoor domed sports facility in Edina. I know very little about your current plans but I thought you might be interested in the following; Several years ago (5 -6 years) there were meetings with the soccer and the baseball board presidents, as well as some representatives from Park and Recreation which was looking at the possibility of a domed sport facility. At that time, as a member of the baseball board, I noted I had a friend who was interested in this project. His name was Cyril Silberman and his company, Uni- Systems is based in Minneapolis. http: / /www.uni- systems.com/ "Uni - Systems, 'LLC is a design, construction, and consultation engineering firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota specializing in kinetic architecture, or movable, mechanized structures designed to adapt to individual structures' needs. The firm has become particularly recognized for its design and installation of retractable roof systems on various sports stadiums across the United States;u Uni- Systems has been involved in the construction of five of the seven sports stadiums incorporating retractable roofs in North America since 1999. " http: / /en.wikipedia.org /wiki /Uni - Systems Mr Silberman, who is the company's president, did his own aerial studies of Edina putting together a topographical map looking for both the best location as well as the most economical approach based on multiple factors. He was doing this as a friend to myself, as well as out of interest in helping communities develop such venues. He attended one of the meetings, put together the above initial proposals, and if Im not mistaken gave them to Park and Recreation for their study. I dont believe he ever heard back from them, and the discussions lost steam. I have not spoken to Mr Silberman about this for several years, but it might be worth your while locating his original studies and recommendations ( Im thinking perhaps Mr,Keprios or Mr MacHolda might still have them). - Uni- Systems is a remarkable company - and you may also want to re- establish contact with Mr Silberman. directly as you evaluate various facility options. Thanks Paul Bearmon - -- On Sat, 11/24/12, paul bearmon <mikburaer22(a),yahoo.com> wrote: Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:32 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attn City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunrio(cDEdinaMN.aov l www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raisins; Families & Doing Business From: Beth Kehoe rmailto:bethhkehoeagmail.coml Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 10:55 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Beth Kehoe Subject: Attn City Council and Engineering To Whom it May Concern, It is with a sad heart and sick stomach that I sit here writing my check for my street assessment. It is neither something I requested, nor something I feel was necessary at this time. With the economy as it is, the time for this surprise work couldn't be worse, Yes, maybe my neighbors needed help with the drainage on the pond near me. Yes, maybe we had a few potholes on our street. Yes, a coating of asphalt may have been important. And yes, maybe that could have all been done at a time when families are getting raises at work that help them keep up with the raises in taxes and inflation. Now is not that time. It is simply sickening that we are being charged $12,379.41 right now. It is an enormous amount at any time for a middle class family. It is an ever bigger amount at this time in history. It is simply a disgrace that this type of bill would just show up in the mail one day. This day of payment has been making me and my husband sick for the last year and now the time has come to pay for it. What is even worse, is that there is now a discussion going on that maybe these surprise letters to families that they owe astronomical bills will cease to happen. That is great to hear. However, why must we bear this entire burden now? If it isn't right for future families, why is right for us, right now? The answer is, it simply isn't. We moved to Edina for a number of reasons. We pay our mortgage on time. We pay our taxes. We celebrate the city. But this type of assessment is more than a black spot on Edina's reputation. It is unthinkable. If, in the future, the city chooses to eliminate this type of assessment, it would be nice if families who have had to bear this burden at this time of economic hardship, would receive a refund of some or all back. Now, with a heavy heart and empty bank account, I submit my payment. Beth Kehoe 5613 Sherwood Ave Edina, MN 55424 Susan Howl Subject: RE: Council Meeting Comments One additional fact check item for the council to be made aware of. The lot that was mentioned by a council member during Tuesdays hearing that was recently developed, that you identified as being at Wooddale and West 70'h' is actually at the corner of West Shore Drive and 70'h. The honorable Mayor inferred that the development of that vacant lot was probably in part credited to the recent street renovations on.7b'h..The fact is prior to May 2012 that lot was never developed. It was previously owned for decades by the past owner of the lot behind it at 6912 Creston Road. Until May it was one of the handful'of undeveloped residential lots left in the city of Edina. The previous home owner on Creston sold both lots back in November 2009 and the new owner never intended to hold on to the lot to the West on West Shore Drive and eventually sold the lot in 'h May of this year. Unless the most recent owner on Creston. Road was clairvoyant and hence knew back in 2009.- what.was going to be done to 70 Street the credit you gave for the lot being developed was wrong. Just another example of the council attempting to take credit when credit is not due while all the time avoiding responsibility forbad judgments. I'm all for the council being commended for their accomplishments but When you repeatedly. try to put lipstick on a pig failing to appreciate you represent a community of farmers so to-speak it's insulting to hear time and time again and should be embarrassing.to you as a body. - I have had four separate snow removal companies come to my residence at 4705 West 70'h street to bid plowing my drive. I have had bidders decline in the past to do my drive due to the traffic on the street but all five who have come out this season told me they would not be interested in bidding it out due to the traffic and the stacking in front of my residence. This was a consequence I did not foresee earlier that I want to credit you for. Would the city have any interest in assuming this responsibility? I'm done for now and my satisfaction doesn't come from anticipating any of you to respond, in fact you have shown from past experience that's not in your nature when the communication doesn't involve accolades. My satisfaction, and I was left to believe Chief Long's is similar, is simply knowing you have been informed. Have you all reached that invisible line marking your level of accomplishment in your chosen careers that you have forgotten how karma works? I hope one day the council will put as much energy into abiding by a mission statement and code of ethics as it does a comprehensive plan. Yours Truly, Hank Babb This document may contain sensitive information which is intended for the recipient only. Any unauthorized use of the material included in this message could result in criminal investigation. If you have received this message in error please notify.the- sender. From: Hank Babb Sent: WednesdayNovember 21, 2012 10:07 AM To: ']long @EdinaMN.gov' Cc: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Council Meeting Comments Chief Long, Simply Unbelievable... Maybe it was your uniform that intimidated them or maybe certain council members are simply tired of hearing the truth but whatever it was you sure struck a nerve during the last council meeting when you addressed your departments concerns regarding the reduction of speed limits on Tracy and West 70'h. They showed their true colors during the meeting in which you spoke. I applaud you for attempting to openly communicating in a transparent fashion the unintended consequences these changes have made to the neighborhoods and your clearly stated intention in doing so which was to warn the council of potential safety risks on the adjacent streets. Any reasonable person that actually listened to what you said couldn't have missed that as being your focal point. Obviously the egos that exist on the opposite side of the podium are not only unable but also unwilling to consider any opinion that differs from theirs which in and of itself displays significant risk to the residents of Edina. If and when J. Sprague becomes mayor, which has been his obvious ambition since joining the community, he will be left with the task of eventually recognizing the "Period of adjustment" he so often refers to doesn't in fact represent eventual acceptance or compliance but rather concerned residents simply giving up the fight from exhaustion. The Mayor fully appreciates and practices this philosophical approach on most issues that garner pushback from residents and it's proven to be an effective strategy so I don't expect it will change. For him to recommend you use your resources to set up what in essence would be speed traps on adjacent streets to those whose speed limits have been reduced indicates his complete inability or unwillingness to consider the concerns you raised. You indicated drivers are veering off 70'h and Tracy to connect to side streets that have speed limits of 30 mph to avoid the congestion that has been created on the main arteries. You didn't mention that your patrol officers observed reckless speeding on those side streets, just increased volumes. The Mayor then took your comment and spun it into cars going 40 -45 mph on side streets posted at 30. No one on the council attempted to correct him which again spoke volumes to me. Mr. Sprague, addressed the fact the volumes on 70th Street have resumed post construction levels and contributes that to "Period of adjustment ". The Southdale Mall is essentially barren due to reconstruction so if volumes are now back to "Normal ", I would argue the increase isn't based on adjustments but rezoning and development in the area they are responsible for. Wait until Southdale resumes normal operations and see what the traffic volumes rise to on that street. Traffic stacks up from Hwy 100 to West Shore Drive now and the light queues by speeds but if the average speed is in fact 32mph wouldn't that tell a reasonable person the street isn't currently functioning by its intended design. To hear Sprague testify the reconstruction on 70th has calmed traffic and made it more enjoyable to live on confirms he will say whatever he deems necessary to sway public opinion from reality. You live close to West 70th Street and see firsthand the impact the signal, roundabout and reduced speed limits have had so who does he think he's fooling. To have multiple members including the Mayor continue to reference members of the community who applaud the 70th Street redevelopment project simply represents their defensive posture regarding the majority of comments they have received that voice concern and frustration which they rarely if ever acknowledge in an open forum. I had a council member graciously accept my invitation to stand in my front yard and observe traffic behaviors at W 70i4 and W. Shore Drive just before the elections. The veteran council member was seasoned enough not to openly share her opinions from her observations that day with me but I assumed she had the moxie to counter argue some of the continual public comments, made by other members of the council, slapping themselves on the back for achieving their goals and meeting the neighborhoods concerns with regards to 70th Street. (I was wrong) The council mistakenly made it apparent they don't value you or your patrol officers opinions and not only that, they don't want to hear them unless it's behind closed doors. This political body represents the decay of our government in my opinion. Maybe you should get your hands on a crash dummy or two and hold a training exercise at the intersection of West Shore and 70th that would help educate the seemingly clueless citizens the increased bodily harm caused to a pedestrian who's hit by a vehicle traveling 35 mph verse 25. it appears, if the council has their way, your job description and that of your officers will be revised in the very near future unless they find a way to shut down your blog. I commend you again for stepping forward and also realize, for you to have achieved the position you have, you too have mastered posturing and power chess. If you ever get tired to the point of giving up or giving in to the machine that obviously exists in our local government I hope you will consider running for the council yourself. Hopefully if that day ever comes you will not become just another cog in the wheel of the bureaucratic system we're currently managed under. I hope I'm not the only resident that communicates their support for your decision to address your opinions and concerns directly with the body responsible for digesting and reacting accordingly to your professional expertise. It's not like you were discussing ground water issues... If they get what they're after the pay will certainly be better for a council member in a few years time. Don't forget the citizens of Edina respect the job you do and value your opinion and we encourage you not to bow down to the dysfunction of those on the council and the body as a whole. Respectfully, Hank Babb This document may contain sensitive Information which is Intended for the recipient only. Any unauthorized use of the material included in this message could result in criminal investigation. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:04 PM To: Scott Neal; Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: for Mayor Hovland Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members,•Scott Neal and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoA Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, L eitrning, Raising Families �& t Doing Business From: Rick Naymark [ mailto:ricknaymark(abgmail.coml Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: for Mayor Hovland Dear Mayor, I live just off of Wooddale on Tower Street. I drive Wooddale often and also bike it. I have concerns about the recent bike /park lane markings. I know you have heard an earful (and then some) about this issue, so I am sorry to add to the fray. But I think the situation is dangerous and still needs to be fixed. The yellow markers that were placed on the street helped a little, but they seem to be unsticking and disappearing. I have seen cars swerve all over, not knowing where to be, and I fear for a collission and injury. As a biker, I would have no problem just biking in the parking lane when heading north. I can bike around any parked cars and be on the lookout for traffic. I know some on the city council want to encourage bikeways, which I support, but Wooddale is not the place to take that stand. I'd like to see a double yellow line painted, on Wooddale and the north bike lane removed, for the safety of all think you have been on the side of the double yellow line solution, and I support you. Rick Naymark Rick Naymark Naymark Marketing, Inc. ricknaymark(a,gmail.com 61`2- 875 -9081 i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:07 PM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: 11/19/12 MAC Meeting Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www. Edina MN.aov I or Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Bob Kane Lmailto:bkane(&sssalesinc.coml Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:04 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2(&comcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshsprague edinarealtx com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Scott Neal Subject: 11/19/12 MAC Meeting Mayor, City Council & City Manager, Thank you for your efforts yesterday at the MAC meeting, and the days leading up to the meeting. You should be applauded for making connections with our State leaders, the MAC Commission, the FAA, and the Edina community in a very tight timeline. I sat among several Edina and Minneapolis residents at the meeting yesterday, who were equally impressed with the eloquent, yet firm, arguments presented by the Mayor and City Manager. Of course, the work is only starting. This is not an Edina or Minneapolis problem, this is a Minnesota problem. Much like we don't want to pollute our lakes, streams and land, we should be equally careful with our airspace. Noise pollution is a real problem. It is only magnified when we talk about air traffic. It's sobering to think the MAC wants to increase airport capacity by 35% in the near future. Expansion of the airport means more noise pollution. The MAC, like any other corporation left uncontrolled, will do as it pleases. The RNAV situation is a signal for the public to get more involved in what the MAC is planning, so we can avoid getting caught off guard again. Again, thank you for your leadership. :.. Robert S. Kane I Kane Companies, Inc. dba S & S Sales 11866 Berkshire Ln I Plymouth, MN 55441 0: 763 - 390 -8021 1 C: 952 - 270 -3672 1 F: 763 -476 -7927 bkanec@sssalesinc.com I www.sssalesinc.com i Susan Howl Subject: Airplane Noise and the Minnesota High Speed Passenger Rail Network Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members: Given the now high profile issue of airplane noise in the community, can I now suggest that we as a group now support the Minnesota High Speed Passenger Rail Initiative. This would give us a safer transportation system and in theory reduce flights and noise out of MSP. And for those that live next to the rail network, there is a new product from Dow that radically reduces the rail noise signature of the rail network. Attached below is the outfit at the state that is working on this and the Youtube video from Dow on their new product. Thanks again Andy Brown 5512 Park Place Edina MN 55424 612 - 220 -3045 http://us.mcl 815 mail yahoo com/mc /welcome ?partner =sbc& gx =1& tm= 1353507244 &.rand= baP6koa5ko4li# 12 = compose && rand= 1651050774 &clean& hash =43 fl. e6dIS77bee92aIf7898 .fl31994c2d &.lsr_and= 3768754 http / /www dot state mn us/ planning /passengerraiIforul-/index.htmI littp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zeb2QOC Gvs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45rS-KdS96w&feature=re . Imfu 1 To: Mayor & Council Members From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 4, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS A e Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received after your packets were delivered. No action is requested. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information ow a !� Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 9:01 AM 'o: Scott Neal ,c: Susan Howl Subject: FVV: Rental Property Registration Program for Edina, MN Attachments: Rental Property _Registration_Program.doc Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Scott'Neal. 't Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ' i or Li%utg, Learning Rai in,, Faruilie Doing f3usi.nrss.. From:. kagereC@aol.com jmailto:kagere(&aol.comT Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 4:02 PM To: Iisa.kaczke(d)ecm- inc.com; MartySheerer(a)EdinaMN . gov; Edina Mail; rknutson@ck- law.com; jonibennettl2()comcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshsprague(a)edinarealty.com; swensonannl@gmail.com Subject: Rental Property Registration Program for Edina, MN TO: Lisa Kaczke, Edina Sun Newspaper, Scott Neal, Edina City Manager, Marty Sheerer, Edina Fire Chief, Roger Knutson Edina City Attorney, James B. Hovland, Edina Mayor, Joni Bennet, Edina City Council, Mary Brindle, Edina City Council, Josh Sprague, Edina City Council, Ann Swenson, Edina City Council Subject; Management of rental housing in the city of Edina. Gentlemen and Ladies; Please read my attached response to the article that appeared in the Edina Sun Newspaper concerning presumed problems with the Cities management of rental housing located within.the Cities area of responsibility. It is my personal view that while the issue does present problems for the Clty and the various individuals living in the City, the proposed options are neither effective or efficient in resolving the issues presented in. the article. New programs which do not improve conditions but do increase costs and management problems for both the City, owners, and residents are not an effort that should be attempted in this time of fiscal shortfalls. New regulations need sound planning and financial efficiency to make a better future for all of the residents of the city. Thank you for your kind. consideration. Kenneth A Gere, a long time resident of Edina and a long time landlord of rental properties, both low income housing as well as high income housing. 1 R n Rental Property Registration Program For Edina, MN Of the three options presented by Fire Chief Marty Sheerer concerning the control of rental housing units in the city of Edina only one is a reasonable solution to a low cost means of management; that of the current status quo. Neither a licensing system nor a registration system create an operational plan that improves or maintains the current housing stock, nor reduces problems with bad rental building owners or bad rental tenants. The suggested solutions only increase potential legal risks for the City as well as the owners of the properties in attempting to meet expectations of the community and the neighbors of the rental building. The stated problem of some 200 complaints a year that involve rental housing units would not be reduced by either a registration system or a licensing system. While the registration system might speed the awareness of the City as to who should be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the property this information is readily available to the City now through the property tax registrations as well as to the various City departments that might have a need for this information. A licensing system would create a legal responsibility for the City of Edina that costs much more than any perceived potential gain that might be achieved by creating such a system. The promise that the City would enjoy reduced complaints and improved quality of operations with a licensing system is a false promise. Such a program would cost the City in increased legal costs in both enforcing the program and the costs of creating a legally acceptable licensing system that meets the goals and needs of the City, the owners, and the tenants who occupy the various properties. Both Minneapolis and Saint Paul are well aware of the costs of defending the City against the city's enforcement of any new code. Is the City of Edina smarter or more financially prepared to fund the defense of such a new program? While the City has legal representation and the tenants have Legal Aid to represent them, the owners would be pressed to spend untold amounts of personal funds to defend themselves under any claim created by the City concerning any complaint against the property regardless of whether the owner has any responsibility concerning said complaint. The costs of such a system would put many properties at risk of total financial failure and total loss of viability of the property to the City, the owner, or the occupants. Everyone loses. Take a serious look at the complaints and the "real" problems which the new programs are being considered to address; load noise, poor property maintenance, illegal behavior, too many people living at the property, "hoarding" by the occupants of the property, not being in the Edina school district( ?). Can anyone define a single problem that is not being addressed via current City regulations and State and Federal laws concerning rental real - estate ownership and the various legal responsibities of operation. I am not sure that peeling paint is ever going to become a class 1 violation of any building code in any community anytime soon. Concern for. the adjacent residents and for the people renting the properties are not necessarily the responsibility: of the owner of the property. Take a second look at the above listed complaints; poor property maintenance is certainly a problem that should be of major concern to the owner as well as the neighbors; but the relationships of the various occupants of the housing next to or near by the rental units is properly handled by those parties involved. Should a law be.violated the problem extends to the City of Edina's legal obligation to demand compliance with City, State, and Federal laws which are already on the books and need only to be applied to the violations as they occur. As an owner and operator of rental housing for over 30 years I can assure you that owners are as concerned about proper maintenance of the building and the quiet enjoyment of the properly by the occupants and concern for the personal needs of neighbors within the property or next door. We have always strived to be a good member of the community we are operating in and cooperative with the neighbors in maintaining a peaceful residence for all in the neighborhood. I have found that the building codes and the local laws and regulations are sufficient to maintain the proper balance between owners, occupants, and the neighbors without additional laws that create unknown legal risks, for the community and the individuals involved in the complaint under discussion at the moment: Thank you for listening. Kenneth A. Gere Edina resident and rental property owner Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:50 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Agenda 21 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message From: brian Aslesen fmailto:bahse @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:49 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Agenda 21 Dear Mayor Hovland, Would you please address the issue of Agenda 21 infiltrating the City of Edina. It is of great concern of mine that we have someone like Mr. Neal who is a member of ICMA sitting in an influential position in our city. The general population usually is not aware of the evils of Agenda 21 until AFTER they have control. Sincerely, Sara A. 0 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf, of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:10 PM Susan Howl abject: FW: Attention: 12/4 City Council Meeting Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ted Volk f mailto:volk239@�mail.coml Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:55 Pm To: Edina Mail Subject: Attention: 12/4 City Council Meeting Dear Council Members, I received a Notice of Public Hearing on roadway improvement, set for 12/11. It coincides with is a previously scheduled Hopkins Schools Budget Meeting that is also also tax - related. Mendelssohn A is the only neighborhood invited to the Public Hearing that belongs to Hopkins Schools District. Usually, the County takes care not to create a scheduling conflict; between tax - related annual meetings. Please consider moving Public Hearing on roadway improvement No. BA -393 to a different date. Also, please have the area description proposed for assessment in the Notice reconciled with the Feasibility Study ,,roject map. Currently, the Notice states "301 to 501 Blake Rd. So." but the map shows that just 5 of 22 properties with .he addresses within this bracket are subject to assessment. Following the Notice's version, estimated cost per assessable lot would be $3,041 lower (per residential equivalent unit) than the one given in the Notice. Thank you, Ted Volk 6301 Belmore Lane 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:48 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Wind Energy - Environment Minnesota Attachments: 3signed letter.doc Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.00v I www.EdinaMN.gov Families & Doin.* Bmsiness For Living, Learning, Raising From: Maria A. Herd [ mailto: mherd01Cc& ham lineuniversity.edul Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:44 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Wind Energy - Environment Minnesota Mayor Hovland, I'm emailing now to ask you to join other local leaders from across Minnesota who are calling on Congress to renew critical clean energy tax credits. As you already know, clean energy is an important part of what's powering Minnesota, providing pollution -free energy and thousands of jobs. Minnesota currently gets nearly 13 percent of its electricity from wind power, a growing industry that employs over 2,000 people across the state. Minnesota has become a leader on clean energy because of our state renewable energy standard and a set of federal incentives that support wind power. And there's more progress to be made. Minnesota's wind resource could provide nearly 25 times the electricity our state currently uses, according to the National Renewable Energy Lab. Unfortunately, critical clean energy tax credits called the Production Tax Credit (PTC) and the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) will expire at the end of this year unless Congress acts. Environment Minnesota is calling on Congress to extend these critical incentives for clean energy. I'm asking you to join us and other local leaders in standing up for clean energy. As an influential leader in our state, your support would go a long way. You can support this effort by adding your name to our letter urging Congress to extend the PTC and the ITC. (Please see the attached letter). Thank you for supporting clean energy. Please respond to this e-mail or give me a call if you would like to add your name to the list of signers. Let me know if you have any questions, would like additional information, or if there's any other assistance I can provide. You can reach me at 707- 208 -5091 and mherd01 CcDhamlineuniversity.edu. Sincerely, Maria Herd - Outreach Coordinator & Intern Environment Minnesota Hamline University student °e Dear Member of Congress, The undersigned state elected officials, leaders, and organizations, on behalf-of our members and activists in Minnesota urge you to support extending, the renewable energy production tax credit (PTC) and the offshore wind investment tax credit (ITC) as soon as possible to reduce our dependence on coal and oil and create a cleaner future for Minnesotans. Clean energy, including wind power; is a growing part of our state's energy mix — creating pollution -free energy and local jobs. These tax credits, which are due to expire at the end of the year, must not be held hostage by Congressional gridlock. Currently, Minnesota gets nearly 13 percent of its electricity from wind power, a growing industry that employs 2,000 to 3,000 people across the state. With our state renewable energy standard and federal incentives, we have been able to attract wind energy manufacturing and create new. jobs. In 2011, we were fourth. in the country for the percentage of our electricity that comes from wind. With states like Minnesota leading the way, wind power is a true American success story. Wind now powers nearly 13 million homes nationwide, including 770,000 in Minnesota. We have doubled wind capacity in the United States in just the past four years, and that means we are avoiding as much carbon pollution as taking 14 million cars off the road and saving 30 billion gallons of water each year. And there's more progress to be made.. Minnesota's wind resource could provide nearly 25 times the electricity our state currently uses, according to the National Renewable Energy Lab. Continued federal support for clean energy will allow us to tap into the true potential to repower Minnesota's economy with clean energy. This will mean more jobs across the state in manufacturing, and a future with cleaner air, cleaner water, and better energy security. Wind is on its way to being cost - competitive with traditional energy sources; the price of wind has dropped 90 percent since 1980. And the jobs are staying here. Nearly 70 percent of a wind turbine's value is now produced in the United States, up from 25 percent in 2005. In addition, we are on the cusp of seeing the first offshore wind farms off our coasts. Along the Atlantic coast alone, reaching the Department of Energy's (DOE) goal of 54 gigawatts of offshore wind power would reduce carbon pollution by the equivalent of taking roughly 18 million cars off the road. Meeting this benchmark would also generate $200 billion in new economic activity while creating more than 43,000 permanent, high - paying jobs in manufacturing, construction, engineering, operations, and maintenance, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Extending the PTC and ITC are critical for the continued growth and success of wind power in America and in Minnesota; if these policies are allowed to expire at the end of this year, we could lose an estimated 37;000 American wind jobs and hard -won momentum on clean energy. Wind power is growing local economies, adding jobs, and creating a cleaner future for Minnesotans — and we should invest in its success. Please work to extend the PTC and the offshore wind ITC as soon as possible to ensure a cleaner, healthier future for Minnesotans. Sincerely, 1 Mayor Don Ness Councilor Jake Spano Duluth St. Louis Park Councilor Amy Brendmoen Councilor Kathy Lantry St. Paul St. Paul Councilor Christ Tolbert Councilor Dan Bostrom St. Paul St. Paul Councilor David Thune Councilor Melvin Carter St. Paul St. Paul Councilor Russ Stark Councilor Ellen Kehr St. Paul Albert Lea Commissioner Gail Dorfman Representative Melissa Hortman Hennepin County District 47b Commissioner Steve O'Neil Commissioner Steve Raukar St. Louis County St. Louis County Commissioner Frank Jewell Councilor Charlie Hurd St. Louis County Mankato Councilor Jim Thompson Representative Kate Knuth Bemidji District 50b Councilor Sonja Berg Representative Mindy Greiling St. Cloud District 54a Mayor Tim Hultmann Long Lake REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Debra Manger City Clerk Date: November 20, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received after you received your packets. No action is requested. Agenda Item #: IX. A. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information ' Sman Howl From: Dennyschulstad(aaol.com rmailto: Den n yschulstad(obaolxoml Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 2:33 AM To: crcarrino@q.com Cc: Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland; Scott Neal; jeanette700(&msn.com Subject: Re: Aviation Noise - -More to Come Connie: Thank you for the e-mail about the impact of the new airport routes on our neighborhood. I had'seen the Strib article and knew something was on the way, but didn't have the details. Pam and I are in Maui for a month. During my 22 years on the Minneapolis City Council, I represented the neighborhood directly adjacent to the airport and thousands of planes flew over the. homes, with full take- off power, at very. low altitudes. The noise made us stop talking when they flew over every minute or two, even when we were inside with windows closed. I was a member of MASAC (Metropolitan Airport Sound Abatement Council) which now apparently has a new name. I attended countless meetings of MASAC and became very knowledgeable about airport noise issues and how little could be done to help. One major "solution" was pushing the MAC into soundproofing thousands of homes with new windows, insulation and air conditioning. They spent millions of dollars retrofitting those homes with the most noise. That made it much more tolerable for. residents when inside, but of course did nothing to. help when outside. Also, modern planes are much less noisy than the older models. I'm worried that Delta is keeping many of the older models here as they move many of the flights and operations to Detroit and Atlanta (I don't have the data to back that up). The major issue is the fact,we have an airport that continues to -grow and has hundreds of take -offs and landings every day. Each of them creates significant noise and the only total solution is to move the airport to a new location., That was discussed thoroughly prior to adding the North /South runway'(which.1 strenuously opposed) and spending" billions of dollars to expand the existing airport in the 1990's. Governor Arnie Carlson. strongly opposed "land banking" property south of Minneapolis for a future airport, if needed due to increased use, and won the fight. That means MSP will be in the current location forever and. if a new runway is ever needed (a third parallel), it would require removing many hundreds of homes in south Minneapolis. Enough of the history. When planes land, they must use one path aiming directly at a runway. They make a lot of noise, but not nearly as much as when taking off under full power. That path goes over Minikanda Country Club and Lake Calhoun on the way to the parallel runways that are most often used. If you live under a landing path, there is nothing that can be done to be of help:- - - - - - - - When planes take off, they do not need to use the same path. They have been scattered so everyone received some noise and a smaller percentage of the total flights over their homes. Now, from what I understand, the planes would be routed in a couple main paths for all take -offs. I don't know the exact paths, but it does seem that one of them would greatly impact the France and Highway 62 area. By the time planes get to that area, they are at a fairly high altitude and have cut back on engine power, so they are much less noisy than when they first take off over south Minneapolis. They are still very bothersome for people enjoying outside activities or with their windows open. My understanding is that the decision to consolidate planes into a couple paths rather than scattering them is due to a desire to eliminate planes over many homes by putting all of them over fewer homes. This is obviously very unfair to those living under the new paths. All flight decisions for airports are made by the FAA. However, the MAC (Metropolitan Airport Commission) has great influence over flight patterns. The MAC has total control over the terminal, runways and flight operations. Local City Councils, Mayors and Legislators have very little power other than trying to influence MAC. Notice, I didn't include the Governor. Every member of MAC is appointed by the Governor, with the exception that the Mayors of Minneapolis and St Paul (or their representative) is automatically a member. That means that the Governor (not Members of Congress or U.S. Senators) have enormous power and influence over MAC and airport operations. MAC members are not elected ... they are appointed. The Governor is elected and he alone appoints the MAC members. Federal elected officials have influence over the FAA, but not nearly as much as the Governor has over MAC. Our City Manager (copied) and Mayor /Council can and should request a delay of this MAC initiative until hearings are held to carefully explain the impact of these proposed flight changes. Perhaps they aren't as bad as we might expect. Remember, on about half of the days (depending on wind) planes take off to the Southeast (over Eagan) and landings come from the Northwest (over Minikanda Country Club). It is the other half of the days when they take off over Edina (and land over Eagan) that the paths are important. The staff members at MSP and the MAC are outstanding. They can very clearly explain and show charts about what is being proposed and why. I told Pam that after spending 22 years working on airport noise issues and attending countless meetings on the subject, I'm not inclined to get involved again. We have excellent elected officials and staff in Edina to study the issues and recommend solutions to the MAC. However, they do need input from citizens and, Connie, that is why I'm so happy to have you involved. Great appreciation to you and other neighbors who work on this very important issue for our neighborhood. Please feel free to share my remarks with others as you wish. z Happy Thanksgiving. Denny In a message dated 11/16/2012 12:13:16 P.M. Central Standard Time, crcarrinoO).g.com writes: Hi- Again, so sorry to bother you on your vacation, but I should have included you in the email below. Thought you might want to know about this. - Connie From: crcarrino(a,q.com To: "Yedda Marks" < edda ,comcast.net >, "Ari Malek" <armalek@wsiwebimpact.com >, "Sue Hanson" <suehanson@vklaw.net >, "Marcie Hamel" <mahfl yer@comcast. net >, "Scott Nelson" <snelson a,djr- inc.com >, "Ellen Grace" <ellz419 e,hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 12:12:14 PM Subject: Aviation Noise - -More to Come Greetings - Not sure if you have been following the STRIB articles about the MAC's 10 -1 decsion to re -route more air traffic over Edina? If you haven't, you might want to get up to speed on this issue. This blog from City Manager, Scott Neal, is a good summary, but you might want to check the STRIB as well. http://www.edinamn.gov/wordpress/aviation-noise-in-edina/ If this thing goes through- -and the MAC along with FAA has more pull than our City does - -not only will the air traffic noise increase in our area. (especially homes near 62 like we are), but also will have a negative impact on property values. Not sure what can be done, but wanted you to know. I sent a note to Mary Brindle yesterday and suggested that the City Council contact Amy Klobuchar.. - Connie Connie Carrino 952.920.2111 Connie Carrino 952.920.2111 C Susan Howl Subject: Airport Noise, redux Dear All - I attended the MAC meeting yesterday and have just read the Star Tribune account of the event. The article is accurate but I wanted to add a little color to the discussion. My comments are based on the facts as I heard them plus a little editorialization along the way; I'll try to keep this to a minimum: • The FAA was attempting to accelerate this project so that they could meet their own internal deadlines for implementation. They were looking for a letter of support from the MAC by the end of this month so that they could commence implementation by March 2013. Otherwise, MSP loses its 'slot' for implementation and would have to go to the end of the FAA line by approximately 16 months. The FAA is populated by people with highly technical backgrounds. Their job is to implement the new RNAV system in all airports across the country (which will take 10 + years to accomplish) which motivates them to push hard where they can. Thus, their drive to not miss deadlines and to keep pace with their internal schedules. They are not necessarily tasked with gauging public opinion or delving too deeply into the environmental impacts although they would likely dispute this comment. • MSP Airport was selected as a 'good candidate' for implementation -not sure what made it good other thar you have one major airline that controls the majority of the gates. The RNAV guidance system does 'slot' air traffic in a tighter bandwidth, which I believe is a major fuel- saving feature. Conveniently, no one from Delta was in attendance. The FAA cited their own environmental studies but these comments were loudly heckled by the crowd and for good reason: no one from the community was involved in any of these studies. Mayor Rybak from Minneapolis was excellent in his stance against the implementation, and challenged the commission to think of this RNAV implementation in a broader context: The MAC is currently developing a long -range plan for the airport (Rybak cited a projected 35% increase in air traffic over the next [10 - 15 ?1 years), which suggests that increased traffic and more precise navigational tools should be studied in tandem. He also cited the need to include the regional airport system in the discussion as well as emerging ground transportation networks. I don't believe these comments were intended to obfuscate the discussion but they did rise logically to the "not a bad idea" level. Finally, he called for the MAC and the FAA to conduct what's known as an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) which includes the public in the process. From personal experience an EIS is no picnic for the one whose project is driving its need. Many of our elected officials were in attendance: Melissa Franzen, Mayor Hovland, Scott Neal (City Manager), Mayor Rybak and adjacent officials. Not everyone was happy. The mayor of Richfield understandably, wants to concentrate traffic over those homes which have already been noise - mitigated by past practices. The proposed slots take traffic over homes that have not had this benefit, although the decoupling of north /south traffic yesterday doesn't change much for Richfield in the near term. The FAA may /may not accept the split- system motion by the MAC. The ball is somewhat in their court but there will be at least a 16 month delay in any implementation. They will require their own further environmental study. The vote yesterday was intended to satisfy most - which it did - but frankly, I personally believe all they have done is buy time for future study before a FULL implementation is completed. I tend to agree with Ron Erhardt who said, ".It's coming ". What Should We Do? Stay informed. , LOOK for information. Read the Trib, Sun Current and the City Manager's Blog on the City of Edina website; Do not assume that "someone else" is going to fix this; we need to be personally involved in whatever capacity we can to contribute; Politically, Edina will not be able to avoid future traffic once the overall system is implemented and it will be implemented (opinion). I believe our goal should be to be as involved as possible so that the current 'dispersion' methodology is basically kept intact. There will be lots of questions to be asked in the future about how to do thus, but if I understand it correctly, RNAV is basically a GPS system dea-intot the navigational system on an airplane so that it will fly a VERY tight and consistent pattern into /out of the airport. So from my perspective it's a software issue. And instead of two major slots for departing traffic to the north, why not 10? Why not some periodic rotation of the traffic? etc., etc. This is the kind of Q & A we were deprived of in this process. Mayor Hovland stated that Edina is not looking to dump the traffic elsewhere and would adopt an egalitarian approach (shared sacrifice). Politically, this is the only position he /eve can take. So we need to be involved so that we can best influence the ultimate outcome. • This is ultimately an FAA issue: if any of you has a relationship with Amy Klobuchar, Al Franken or Erik Paulsen, call their office and let them know that you are involved and participating in the outcome. Our local officials will be helpful on- the - ground, but because this is a Federal decision we need Federal involvement. Phone calls are the best; speak to someone live. E -mails get deleted. By the way, I'm not looking.to become any type of spokesman on this but wanted to pass these thoughts along to you. I think this is very important. We should all be as involved as we can be and exert our influence where we can. We each have something productive to contribute to this. Happy Thanksgiving! Paul PS - Feel free to forward as you see fit and if you think I've misstated something or have the facts wrong, please feel free to correct me as well. Susan Howl a } From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:03 PM To: Wayne Houle; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike lanes on Wooddale Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Wayne Houle and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno(@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.9ov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Nancy Haley f mailto:nhaley(&mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:46 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Nancy Haley Subject: Bike lanes on. Wooddale Good morning, I support bike lanes, however, as a daily driver on Wooddale Avenue, I find that this is not an appropriate street for such paths. If parking were not allowed on one side of the road, I believe that bike paths would be appropriate. However, even with center line tabs, drivers are confused about where to drive and are often seen driving down the center of the road. I have witnessed drivers traveling southbound who do *not* drive in the bike path when there are no bikes present. I've had to come to a dead stop until they pass as there were cars parked on the east side of the street! What will happen when our streets are covered in ice and snow and lane markers are not visible? Also, because of this configuration, cars cannot pass when bikes occupy the paths. Heaven forbid that two bikes are traveling in opposite directions - automobile traffic would be stopped! I understand that there have already been two accidents. What is the threshold for accidents /fatalities before the City will remove this bike path? I also question the argument that other streets in Minneapolis - and Europe - have such configurations. Do these streets allow for street parking thereby reducing or eliminating the possibilities for cars to pass when the bike paths are being used and cars are parked? Please make sure Mayor Hovland receives this email. I respectfully request a response. Thank you, Nancy Haley 4521 Parkside Lane 612.770.2801 Syssa�. [, From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:11 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: planning meeting Lynette Biunno, Receptionist .. ` 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 "1 ! IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising F, amilies &. Doing Business From: paul bearmon [mailto•mikburcier22(ayahoo.com1 Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:15 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettlN bcomcast.net; ,joshspra4ue(&edinarealty.com; swensonannlC�gmail.com; Mary Brindle Subject: planning meeting Dear Mayor Hovland, I would like to thank you and those members of our council who so well represented Edina at the Metro Airport planning commision meeting. The proposal was not well vetted, and placed a large part of Edina in a V shaped corrider of noise. We would have been catching it strongly from both arms of the "V." Sincerely, Paul Bearmon - -- On Sat, 11/17/12, Paul bearmon m> wrote: From: paul bearmon <mikburger22(cyahoo.com> Subject: airport noise planning meeting . To: "mail gEdinaNIN. gov" <mail@EdinaMN ov >, " jonibennettI2- acomcast.net'! <jonibennettl2Qcomcast.net >, "joshspraguegedinarealty.com" y.com >, it swensonannl �_ mail.com" <swensonannl ggmail.com >, "mbrindlega EdinaMN.gov" <mbrindleQEdinaMN.gov> Cc: rob webbl9M&mail.com Date: Saturday, November 17, 2012, 1:32 PM Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members Hopefully the Edina City council will have strong representation on this issue at the airport meeting Thank You Paul Bearmon In case you hadn't seen the Star Tribune articles and circulating emails. The Star Tribune article today starts out, "An airport noise advisory group signed off Wednesday on a plan to concentrate the routes for aircraft takeoffs, despite a parade of protests from Minneapolis and Edina residents who will have more planes roaring over their homes." See full article: http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/179374851.htmi A concern being expressed is that Edina has not had any representation on the Noise Oversight Committee that made the recommendation. The Edina city manager and mayor are working to get a voice in the process. According the the news article, the final meeting on this matter is: "Quincy said the commission will hear on Monday about Minneapolis' view that the FAA and commission didn't inform the public adequately, that the proposal increases flights over residential areas of Minneapolis and other concerns. That meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. in Room 3048A of the Lindbergh Terminal. Those who want to attend need to obtain a pass from the information desk on the terminal's tram level to get through security." Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:10 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Thank you, Mr. Hovland Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927-88611 Fax 952 -826-0389 ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN-q0v ... For Living, Learning, Raising Families. Doing Business From; Teri LaFrenz rmai Ito: teri. lafrenz0)ci ma il.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 5:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you, Mr. Hovland Dear Mr. Hovland, Thank YOU for standing up to the MAC today and getting it stopped! We are in the final stages of planning a major remodel on our home and when this airplane routing change came up in the news, it stopped us in our tracks. Should we re-invest in our home, or move? We are so happy to stay. Best regards! Teri LaFrenz 5400 Abbott Place Edina 1 Susan Howl t T From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:12 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Y�P� 1' 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 r , . y(= �t ) , Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.aov ' .. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Genau, Mike mailto• mike. enau @medtronic.com1 Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 7:53 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Lynette, Thank you for your reply. Based on what I read this evening, it looks like we won the battle for Edina, but it will likely be a long, hard fought war. Tell the Mayor and Council to keep it going! Stay the fight!! Thanks again, Mike From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunno(�bEdinaMN.govl On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:07 PM To: Genau, Mike Subject: RE: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Dear Mike and Sandi, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members. if I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist W(I r `� '' 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(&EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Genau, Mike [ mai lto•mike.genau(�medtronic.com] Sent: Saturday, November.17, 2012 5:16 PM To: patrick.hogan mspmac.org Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) 1 Mr. Hogan, We recently read the information on the proposed changes in air traffic for flights landing and departing from Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport and we have to say that the process the Commission and FAA is using does not appear to be fair or fully vetted. We are new to the area and are in the process of buying a home in Edina. With this news, we will likely walk away from our contract, thus losing our significant earnest money, as we feel we have no choice. The risk of property devaluation is too great: We like the area and felt it would be a good investment, and that the quality of life would be very good, as well. But, the proposed changes in flight patterns will have a SIGNIFICANT, negative impact on any real- estate investment in Edina and the quality of life will suffer. Surely you are hearing from many people who are upset with the way this has been handled. The apparent lack of concern for the people of Edina is alarming. At this time,,we are not in favor of the proposed changes to the MSP flights and request that the vote scheduled for Monday be postponed and that the changes not be recommended to the FAA. Perhaps, after a more thorough evaluation of the ramifications of the changes, our opinion will.change. _We. expect the same courtesy, consideration and involvement as all the other communities who are affected and do not appreciate the seemingly non - transparent way this has been handled. Respectfully, Mike & Sandi Genau Cc: Mayor James Hovland [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com 0j Susan Howl ; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Edina Sports Dome Dear Mayor Hovland, Ms. Bennett, Ms. Brindle, Ms. Swenson, and Mr. Sprague, I am writing to you to express my strong support for a sports dome in Edina. I am a resident of Edina and the 91h grade baseball coach at Edina Public Schools. I am also actively involved in the Edina Baseball Association (EBA) and with Nevers Larkin Baseball. These organizations have all expressed to you how important a sports dome is to our community and for the continuing success of our baseball program. I echo their sentiments in requesting that you move forward with the dome project. I add to my comments only one other sentiment. Please consider quality and diversity of activities a very important part of building this dome. I believe that there is a strong possibility that these domes become even more prevalent in communities in the next 5 -10 years. What has, and always will, set Edina apart from other communities is that we do things right the first time. Let's build something we can all be proud of and that will blow the competition away. It might cost more in the beginning, but in the long run, I believe it will pay off and ultimately be cheaper as everyone will be modeling their dome after our dome rather than our dome constantly needing to upgrade to catch up to the competition. Respectfully submitted, Mike O'Brien Mike O'Brien RLGAN ] X 1. \ 7760 France Avenue South, Suite 1040 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Direct: (952) 921 -2105 Fax: (952) 921 -2109 Email: mike(a�regantaxlaw.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:41 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Crime Impacting an Edina Family Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunnoP Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN -gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families .& Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Darcy Douglas [mailto:ddouglas@rarcy.coml Sent: Monday, Novembe"r19, 2012 6:50 PM To: Jeff Long; James Hovland; Edina Mail Subject: Crime Impacting an Edina Family Mayor Hovland and Police Chief Long, I am writing this evening to ask for your assistance in dealing with a crime that occurred this morning in the parking lot of the Especially For Children day care center on West 70th Street and Highway 100 in Edina. My wife, Darcy Douglas, was dropping off our two young children at the day care center when her car window was smashed and her purse stolen. She called Edina Police to the scene and received a case number (case number 12- 002802). Later in the day, we spoke with members of Edina Police and shared tracking data from our mobile phone that demonstrated that at least the phone was located in a home in Saint Paul. We also shared data about the times and places where the thieves used our credit cards to buy gas, groceries, and other items, in hopes that store cameras could be used to identify those involved. We were told by a dispatcher that several purses were stolen today. What is most concerning about this event is the audacity of the thieves to steal in front of a day care center. In my wife's purse were pictures of our children and a medical card with their names. I am extremely concerned for their safety, and I am worried for other parents and children if this crime is indicative of a pattern. My wife called Edina Police this afternoon, but did not receive a commitment to temporarily increase patrols around the area of the day care center. I am hoping that this can be arranged. My wife and I wish to cooperate and share as much data as we can in hopes of helping the Edina Police team build a case against these individuals. We would both appreciate a call or message regarding this incident. Thank you very much to you and the Edina Police team for helping keep our city and children safe. Sincerely, Ryan and Darcy Douglas 7025 Comanche Court Edina, MN 55439 (952) 681 -2755 Susan Howl a Mr. Hovland - I met you recently at the Shoemates house prior to the election. I introduced Jeni at the event and you and spent some discussing the residential construction in the neighborhood. I am also a member of the Edina Soccer Club board and feel passionate about Edina doing something special when it comes to the overall solution for indoor green space. I feel that most of ideas being considered are inferior solutions in the grand scheme of community green space. Having been on the board for 4 years, I am not uninformed of the challenges in our community in achieving the solution. I have personally addressed the Park and Rec board to help resolve the issues in a collaborative way. The topic that I have never presented is clearly the greatest solution for multi sports green space demand during our 5 months where we can't use outdoor fields. Please help me understand the challenges that would preclude the city from redeveloping the Fred Richards golf course into a multiplex for all of our sports. Looking at the location from Google Maps, it appears you could fit over 7 full size football fields on the property. • Location in office park with very few homes affected • It could accommodate hockey rinks, turf fields, and enough parking • It could generate direct income that would far exceed the revenues from the golf course as a venue for tournaments hosted by our clubs and associations • It could accommodate a complex that reflects Edina rather than the temporary or band aid type solutions being considered • It could generate indirect income from the close proximity of Edina shopping and restaurants featured at nearby France Ave The access for other communities off of 494 /France makes it a great location Mayor Hovland, I can't imagine why our community wouldn't make this the primary target real estate for our solution. It appears to have fewer obstacles than any other location, and offers by far the greatest upside for our entire city, and will provide our athletic associations a dream facility that we can all be proud of, because it it financially feasible and profitable. Let's do this ..... I will see you at the meeting on Tuesday night! Jeff Carlson 4303 Oakdale Ave Edina MN 55424 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:01 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject FW: airport noise planning meeting Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www- EdinaMN.gov -'�-' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: paul bearmon ,rmailto:mikbur er22 yahoo.coml Sent: Saturday, November 17,, 2012 1:32 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; ioshspragueOedinarealty.com; swensonannl(ftmail . com; Mary Brindle Cc: rob.webb1998(a)gmail.com Subject: airport noise planning meeting Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members Hopefully the Edina City council will have strong representation on this issue at the airport meeting Thank You Paul Bearmon In case you hadn't seen the Star Tribune articles and circulating emails. The Star Tribune article today starts out, "An airport noise advisory group signed off Wednesday on a plan to concentrate the routes for aircraft takeoffs; despite a parade of protests from Minneapolis and Edina residents who will have more planes roaring over their homes." See full article: http://wvvw.startribune.com/local/minnE)apolis/17937 851.html A concern being expressed is that Edina has not had any representation on the Noise Oversight Committee that made the recommendation. The Edina city manager and mayor are working to get a voice in the process. According the the news article, the final meeting on this matter is: "Quincy said the commission will hear on Monday about Minneapolis' view that the FAA and commission didn't inform the public adequately, that the proposal increases flights over residential areas of Minneapolis and other concerns. That meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. in Room 3048A of the Lindbergh Terminal. Those who want to attend need to obtain a pass from the information desk on the terminal's tram level to get through security." 0 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:03 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Contact Us form submission - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �N 1 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(a�EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov f} ... ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: mail(&EdinaMN.gov [mailto:mail0)EdinaMN.4ovl Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: David Sullivan - Nightengale Organization: Self Website: Address 1: 1132 Norton Street Address 2: City: Saint Paul State: MN Zip_Code: 55117 Email: dsullivannightengale@yahoo.com Phone: 651- 247 -6410 Referrer: Message: Dear Edina: I heard you have been recently confronted by a proposed change to flight patterns at Minneapolis /Saint Paul International Airport. I\'ve analyzed aviation safety data both in graduate school and professionally inlcuding award winning research at Embry - Riddle Aeronautical University and within the Office of the Secretary of Defense for support of Defense Safety Oversight Council initiatives. I \'ve also represented the Department of Defense at the FAA - sponsored Joint Implementation Measurement Data Analysis Team. So, I can tell if the FAA is really going to be providing a margin of safety or not with changes to flight routes based on FAA and airline collected data. If you are interested, I can have a look at the data and compared to a known list of hazards. I am wondering what data the FAA showed you and if I can take a look a, it. I do not charge anything as this is part of my involvement with the System Safety Society volunteering for i - - - - - - - - - - - - - support of civic activities. Please feel free to call or e-mail me Best regards, David I Sul I ivan-Ni ght.engale, ASP System Safety Engineer Susan Howl Name: David Sullivan- Nightengale Organization: Self Website: Address 1: 1132 Norton Street Address 2: City: Saint Paul State: MN Zip—Code: 55117 Email: dsullivannightengalegyahoo.com Phone: 651- 247 -6410 Referrer: Message: Dear Edina: I heard you have been recently confronted by a proposed change to flight patterns at Minneapolis /Saint Paul International Airport. IVve analyzed aviation safety data both in graduate school and professionally inlcuding award winning research at Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University and within the Office of the Secretary of Defense for support of Defense Safety Oversight Council initiatives. I\'ve also represented the Department of Defense at the FAA- sponsored Joint Implementation Measurement Data Analysis Team. So, I can tell if the FAA is really going to be providing a margin of safety or not with changes to flight routes based on FAA and airline collected data. If you are interested, I can have a look at the data and compared to a known list of hazards. I am wondering what data the FAA showed you and if I can take a look at it. I do not charge anything as this is part of my involvement with the System Safety Society volunteering for support of civic activities. Please feel free to call or e-mail me Best regards, David J. Sullivan- Nightengale, ASP System Safety Engineer ____ _ _ S isan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail ,Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:07 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnona.EdinaMN.aov l www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6i Doing Business From: Genau, Mike [mai Ito: mike genau(�medtronic.coml Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:16 PM To: patrick.hogan mspmac.org Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed Changes at MSP (MAC /FAA) Mr. Hogan, We recently read the information on the proposed changes in air traffic for flights landing and departing from Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport and we have to say that the process the Commission and FAA is using does not appear to be fair or fully vetted. We are new to the area and are in the process of buying a home in Edina. With this news, we will likely walk away from our contract, thus losing our significant earnest money, as we feel we have no choice. The risk of property devaluation is too great. We like the area and felt it would be a good investment, and that the quality of life would be very good, as well. But, the proposed changes in flight patterns will have a SIGNIFICANT, negative impact on any real- estate investment in Edina and the quality of life will suffer. Surely you are hearing from many people who are upset with the way this has been handled. The apparent lack of concern for the people of Edina is alarming. At this time, we are not in favor of the proposed changes to the MSP flights and request that the vote scheduled for Monday be postponed and that the changes not be recommended to the FAA. Perhaps, after .a more thorough evaluation of the ramifications of the. changes; our opinion will change. We expect the same courtesy, consideration and involvement as all the other communities who are affected and do not appreciate the seemingly non - transparent way this has been handled. Respectfully, Mike & Sandi Genau Cc: Mayor James Hovland [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http• / /emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com Susan Howl , From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:08 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina City Council- airport noise Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ,' 952 - 927 -8861 I Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCaD_EdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.aov �1- For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Kathy Thurlow [ mailto•kathrynCai)blackhole.coml Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:52 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council- airport noise Mayor Hovland, The incr airport noise over Edinborough /Centenial Lakes has been severely incr since summer 2011 (incr the next wk after Mpls complained of noise). It is interesting that they have chosen the more mod priced housing to incr noise over. One response is that it would reduce fuel use -How would this happen since they will not report they are decr flights. We in Edina had no input regarding this just like this latest proposal. I moved from Lake St/West River Rd due to suddenly incr daily noise at 12:30 -2 AM and 5:30AM to mid AM. Never could get any sleep. I looked for several areas to buy a condo seven yrs ago and thought Edina was well managed and had no significant airport noise. Now there is alot of noise early in the morning sometimes every 30 -60 sec (more on weekends) so that your sleep is interupted. The noise makes it difficult to hear evening movies /music at Cent Lakes. This is espec irritating as there has never been airport noise here and now this will affect my property value. Mpls and south of the river residents knew what the noise levels were as it has always been mod to severe. I had planned to stay here long term but now the past yr I have been thinking about leaving Edina due to this noise problem. I would appreciate you and the council fighting for our representation about airport noise. Thank you, Kathryn Thurlow 7610 York Ave S #3304 Edina, MN 55455 952 - 835 -4268 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:08 PM cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina City Council - airport noise -< Lynette Biunno, Receptionist . ....... .: , �f'• r,, 2-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kathy Thurlow rmailto•kathUn(!5)blackhole.coml Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:52 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council- airport noise Mayor Hovland, The incr airport noise over Edinborough /Centenial Lakes has been severely incr since summer 2011 (incr the next wk after Mpls complained of noise). It is interesting that they have chosen the more mod priced housing to incr noise over. One response is that it would reduce fuel use -How would this happen since they will not report they.are decr flights. We in Edina had no input regarding this just like this latest proposal. I moved from Lake St/West River Rd due to suddenly incr daily noise at 12:30 -2 AM and 5:30AM to mid AM. Never could get any sleep. I looked for several areas to buy a condo seven yrs ago and thought Edina was well managed and had no significant airport noise. Now there is alot of noise early in the morning sometimes every 30 -60 sec (more on weekends) so that your sleep is interupted. The noise makes it difficult to hear evening movies /music at Cent Lakes. This is espec irritating as there has never been airport noise here and now this will affect my property value. Mpls and south of the river residents knew what the noise levels were as it has always been mod to severe. had planned to stay here long term but now the past yr I have been thinking about leaving Edina due to this noise problem. I would appreciate you and the council fighting for our representation about airport noise. Thank you, Kathryn Thurlow 7610 York Ave S #3304 Edina, MN 55455 952 - 835 -4268 1 Susan Howl , From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:09 PM Cc: Subject: Susan Howl FW: Edina to be inundated with flights overhead no public hearings? Importance: High Lynette Biunno, Receptionist rrir'i 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(ZDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov % ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business From: Keith McCracken I McCrackenAP rmailto:keith(�omccrackenap.coml Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 10:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina to be inundated with flights overhead - no public hearings? Importance: High Dear Mayor Hovland, I am completely dismayed along with everyone I have spoken to in the last few days since we heard that the MAC will vote on Monday (tomorrow) to approve new flight patterns for MSP; the net result of which will redirect flights over SW suburbs and non more so than the city of Edina. I do not know where to begin with regard to the nuisance, health hazard and property value issues are concerned but setting these huge concerns apart for a moment, I had ego ask why hasn't there been public hearings on the matter so citizens could at least be informed and just possibly be able to influence decisions in this regard? I apologize for the eleventh hour nature of this email but the story about the impending vote was only announced this week in the Star Tribune and he surreptitious nature if the flight path initiative is also a growing area of concern on the part of the people I have spoken with or heard from. On behalf of everyone in the flight path of the new routes, may I ask you to intercede so that the MAC vote can be postponed at least until after more information is made available to the public? Thank you Andrew Keith McCracken 89 Woodland Circle, Edina, MN 55424 -1454, USA Tel: 952 927 4202 Cell: 612 203 6003 Fax: 612 395 5254 Email: mccracken @onvovmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:44 PM To: Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for the sports.dome in the right location Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f'�C'i ' t `: 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ,r •;.i,l.; IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I www. Edina MN.pov ...For. Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Iisa.Eckroth Lmai Ito: leckroth @me.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:56 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Mike Eckroth Subject: Support for the sports dome in the right location Dear Mayor, We are residents of Edina and the parents of two children that participate in multiple sports and activities. My I 1 year old son plays football and soccer competitively for Edina. We are writing to express our support for building a sports dome in Edina. The dome provides numerous benefits for the city including: a place for winter activities and sports for children and adults and enhanced standard of living for our community. However, we are not in favor of using the current Braemar soccer field location for this dorne. Those fields are extremely valuable to the soccer program as our program is already very limited on space. These fields also represent some of the best soccer facilities in the entire metro area and we would not want to lose that space to gain winter space. We hope that you join us in support of this initiative to build a sports dome in a location that meets all programs needs. Thanks for your consideration. Lisa and MIke Eckroth Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:49 PM To: Ann Braden; Courtney Whited; 'Jennifer Janovy'; 'Michael Thompson'; Nathan Franzen; 'Paul Nelson'; Steven Schweiger; Surya lyer; Tom LaForce Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Wooddale Bike Lanes again ... For City Council and Transportation Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and the Transportation Commission members. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(- EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Busincss From: Kathy Dahlheimer [ mailto'kdahlheimer&comcast.netl Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:45 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Wooddale Bike Lanes again ... For City Council and Transportation Hello ... Just returned from one of my usual 4 -5 trips on Wooddale Avenue and really could not believe what I saw at rush hour. As I checked the oncoming traffic going south on Wooddale in order to make a right from West 60th I observed a car basically thinking the road was a one way so they were pretty much in the left. You can imagine the mess as people at Valley View are trying to make a right to go North on Wooddale. At least 5 near misses for an accident. This happened because these markings are just a big mess and create confusion. I just read the article in the Sun Currant and must note that Wooddale Avenue in Edina really should not be compared to Europe! This may work in Europe but it is not workinE on Wooddale. Thanks for whatever you can do to make this road safer. Kathleen Dahlheimer S san Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail ent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:55 PM ;C: Susan Howl Subject: FW: new flight patterns over Edina '- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist IL4; 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 IbiunnoeEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaWgov -J For Living, learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Pearson, Dave Lmailto:DPearsonOWnthrop.coml Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 3:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: new flight patterns over Edina I live at 4513 Browndale Ave in Edina. I am very concerned about the proposed changes to the flight patterns. It will divert significant air traffic over my neighborhood. I fled south Minneapolis to get away from airplane noise and now it is coming back!! This is very bad for Edina and will adversely affect property values and the quality of life. Please make an effort to stop this. Thanks. David P. Pearson Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. Shareholder (612) 604 -6692 dpearson @winthrop.com vCard I Bio Capella Tower I Suite 3500 1 225 S 6th Street I Minneapolis, MN 55402 Notice: Important disclaimers & limitations apply to this email. Please click here for our disclaimers and limitations. 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:56 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Flight paths Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message From: Lisa Bjerken fmailtodbierken @ earthlink.netl Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 5:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Flight paths Jim The most important issue for residents right now is the proposed flight path changes over Edina. This will devalue our home and severely impact our quality of life where we have lived for 30 years. The FAA and MAC are ramrodding their predetermined outcomes through. The process is not democratic or transparent and lacks adequate public input. The denial of our city manager's request for further review /study was denied. A very few are being asked to bear the brunt of the noise for the entire metro area. This is a much higher transportation issue than bike paths. Thanks for your advocacy on this issue. Lisa Bjerken and Dana Widstrom Sent from my Wad S san Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail gent: Monday, November -19, 2012 2:57 PM Susan Howl Subject: FW: New flight paths -- -easy online petition Lynette, Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoaEdinaMN.gov I www,EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From:. Grant Templeton Lmailio•granttempleton icloud.coml - Sent: Friday,- November 16, 2012 9:34 PM To: Edina Mail;- Ron Erhardt; Keith Downey; Melisa Franzen Subject: Fwd: New flight paths --- easy online petition With this hot issue, we are hearing that Edina_ didn't have a voice in this matter. We are wanting to .make sure that someone will be there on Monday that will have some influence. 1. This is a huge issue; along with the noise, we are VERY concerned about our property values. It is our feeling that everyone should share in these flight patterns, not just a concentrated zone. We have been emailing and calling our friends and neighbors to get the word out. Please be a strong advocate for Edina. Grant Templeton Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: Laura -Gail Templeton Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:08 PM Subject: FW: New flight paths -- -easy online petition Hi everyone, With the proposed flight plan discussion heating up, I just got this from our neighbor and wanted to pass it on to as many as I could. Looking at the proposed plan online, a lot of Edina residents will be affected by this and we really haven't had the opportunity to learn more and discuss this with our representatives and the decision makers. There has been discussion that home affected by this change could see a drop in home values of 20 %. For many people, it has been hard finding more information on all of this and they are voting on the changes on Monday at fpm —odd scheduling with many out of town and busy with the Thanksgiving Holiday. Apparently there has been no representation on behalf of Edina. We are planning to be at the meeting Monday to speak against it. We aren't expecting no traffic, but an equal distribution of flight patterns— everyone uses the airport either through transportation of self or goods. 1 These articles from the Star Tribune seem to highlight it all pretty well: http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/179374851.html http• / /www.startribune.com /local /blogs /179530671.htmi This is the link to the online petition, please consider signing it and passing this email on to as many people as you can before Mondays vote. http•/ /www change org/ petitions / metropolitan - airport- commission - mac - stop - building- an- airplane- freeway- over -our- neighborhoods ?utm campaign= petition created email &utm medium = email &utm source = guides Wanted to pass along this very important issue Thanks Laura -Gail Templeton Begin forwarded message: H i, I hope you all are doing great! I just became aware of the airport wanting to change air traffic routes the other day and became concerned of the implications it would have on our neighborhoods. If you are interested below is an online petition. Please feel free to sign and pass on if you would like. Here is a petition that was just emailed to me ......:........... Here is a link to a petition if you haven't seen or done this yet sign it as well. http•/ /www change org /petitions /metropolitan- airport- commission - mac - stop - building -an- airplane - freeway- neighborhoods ?utm campaign= petition created email &utm medium = email &utm source = guides Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r af=t. 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 1IbiunnoOEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: mail EdinaMN.gov Lmailto mail0EdinaMN.gov1 Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 12:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject' Contact Us form submission Name: Marie D Jackson Organization: Website: 4604 Drexel Ave Address 1: Address - 2: 4604 Drexel Ave City: Edina . State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: Mari edjacksonggmail.com Phone:9522858417 Referrer: someone-in-the-neighborhood Message:. Please advise what the Mayor and city officials intend to do about the MAC decision to make my neighborhood a new highway for air traffic. I want to know if any city officials intend to be at the meeting on Monday November 19 at Ipm. Why did this entire situation come as such a surprise to everyone in Edina If you expect the support of residents in this city you need to do your job this situation shows that someone in the city office should have known about this I am beyond angry as I have watch my property value assessment increase year over year -- how will you deal with the decrease in home values WHAT IS YOU PLAN Marie Jackson 1 From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:59 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Contact Us form submission Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r af=t. 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 1IbiunnoOEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: mail EdinaMN.gov Lmailto mail0EdinaMN.gov1 Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 12:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject' Contact Us form submission Name: Marie D Jackson Organization: Website: 4604 Drexel Ave Address 1: Address - 2: 4604 Drexel Ave City: Edina . State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: Mari edjacksonggmail.com Phone:9522858417 Referrer: someone-in-the-neighborhood Message:. Please advise what the Mayor and city officials intend to do about the MAC decision to make my neighborhood a new highway for air traffic. I want to know if any city officials intend to be at the meeting on Monday November 19 at Ipm. Why did this entire situation come as such a surprise to everyone in Edina If you expect the support of residents in this city you need to do your job this situation shows that someone in the city office should have known about this I am beyond angry as I have watch my property value assessment increase year over year -- how will you deal with the decrease in home values WHAT IS YOU PLAN Marie Jackson 1 November 12, 2012 City of Edina page,1 of 2 , Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Tree Removal Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: We have been discussing the completion of a written settlement agreement with respect to the removal of our two corner spruce trees. You have suggested the agreement and the elements it should contain, yet when you received a draft of it, you changed your position and refused to complete it. After reviewing the situation with our legal counsel, we will discontinue our pursuit of such an agreement with you. You do not appear willing to honor your verbal commitment. And our attorney points out that there is no reason to ask you to agree to not disturb the remaining trees, since their existence does not violate any ordinance or section of our city code (as confirmed by a comprehensive legal review conducted this past year that you are in possession ot), nor do they restrict any sight line (as confirmed by a sight line study conducted by a professional traffic engineering firm, at your suggestion, that you are also in possession of). After speaking with several of you, I think we can agree that the ordeal that you have put us through the past year and a half does not represent a model process. Let me review what has transpired: • An informational meeting was held in June, 2011 with respect to a proposed temporary asphalt sidewalk along Valley View Road. 68 area residents signed a letter opposing this sidewalk. The matter was discussed during a City Council meeting and voted down. • This must have upset two residents, Dianne Plunkett- Latham and Linda Zempel, who circulated a petition to remove 30 of our trees along Valley View Road. (Ironically, neither lives on Valley View.) • A sight line study by WSB was completed one day after the petition was delivered to the City. You indicated the study was the result of the petition, but when we pointed out the impossibility of receiving it in one day, you indicated that the study had nothing to do with the petition. Curious. • In September you sent us a letter indicating that during an upcoming meeting the City Council planned to discuss the matter and a recommendation to require the removal of all 30 trees. • Several signers rescinded their signatures after discovering what the petition was really for (they were told it was for merely trimming back two corner trees, but it was really for removal of 30 trees). • Since signatures were obtained under false pretenses, the matter should have ended then and there. • We wrote City Council to state that the petition was misrepresented, calling the timing of the WSB study into question, reviewing the Edina City Code to confirm the trees do not violate any part of it, indicating that removal would actually violate Section 830, and informing Council that the trees were originally planted in 1992 at the recommendation of the City of Edina Planning Office. • In October you sent us a letter demanding the removal of our 30 trees. No reason was stated. • It became apparent that you were not interested in listening to us, nor to facts and reason, but rather were willing to listen to the demands of two residents that you knew misrepresented the neighborhood. • A council member advised us to hire our own traffic engineer to conduct a sight line study. We did. • The study was conducted by RLK, a professional traffic engineering firm, concluding that none of our trees were obstructing the sight line required by MnDot Road Design Manual standards. • We felt we had to hire legal counsel, and also appear at a City Council meeting to appeal. • A comprehensive legal review of the city code by legal counsel determined no violations of any section. = - - - -- -- -- - - - - -. - -- - Cit _ of Edina page 2 of 2 • Knowing the trees are in compliance, you indicated that the real issue is one of safety at the intersection. • A review of accident history with the Edina Police Department determined there is no record of any accident at the intersection. There appears to be no safety issue. It was simply made up to excite people. • The, previous owner of our home wrote a letter confirming that the majority of the trees were planted in 1992' at the recommendation of the Planning Office of the City of Edina itself. • In November we spoke at a Councilmeeting and reviewed the situation, to include the RLK study. • In December you determined we only needed to trim back several trees to open up the sight line. The City Engineer marked the trees with ribbons indicating how much to shave off. We complied. He inspected the tree line and stated we had complied with City's request. • In January, 2012 you changed the request to require full de- limbing of six trees to a height of eight feet. • Our lawyer sent you a letter reviewing the facts and that there is no legal basis for demanding anything. • You requested that we enter into formal, mediation proceedings. We agreed. _ • In April we spent for hours in mediation, concluding with what the mediator thought was a compromise where we remove two trees and you agree to take no action on the rest of them. • The next day you changed your position and continued to demand de- limbing of four trees. This caused us to return to mediation for a second session. After two hours, the mediator terminated the proceedings on the grounds that the City was not mediating in good faith. Even the mediator was frustrated with you. • You asked us to mediate, and then you would not do so in good faith. This cost us thousands of dollars. • You returned to your pre- mediation demand to de -limb the trees. • Our attorney sent you a letter re- iterating the facts... questionable petition, rescinded signatures, no legal sight line issue, no legal violation of City Code, no safety issue, your refusal to mediate. • At this point the neighborhood was upset by your treatment of us. A letter was submitted by approximately 60 residents requesting that the City cease all actions with respect to us and the trees. • In August, 2012 the Mayor suggested we come to an agreement to remove two trees, and should have a written settlement agreement identifying the two trees, requiring the maintenance of the currently existing sight line, and agreeing to leave the rest of the trees alone. We agreed. • We prepared a draft settlement agreement for your review. You did not respond. • In October; 2012 you sent us a letter demanding removal of two trees. We reminded you about the agreed -upon settlement agreement. It was your idea, but you refused to discuss it. o You sent a follow -up' letter demanding: removal of two different trees. The letter was received on November 2 "d and required us to remove the two trees by - November 9t'. That's not much time to arrange to have them removed. We have 'removed the two trees at our expense and hope the ordeal is finally over. We (and many, in the neighborhood) are very upset over your approach to this situation. it is clear this is a case of politics over facts, and represents a method of persuasion akin to the bullying in our schools that you rail against with great fanfare. You have received quite a bit of critical correspondence lately regarding your attitude toward the citizens of our city and the processes you have been following lately. We would like to think that this was not a process you would elect to repeat again. Respectfully, Douglas and Jill Benner Cc: _James Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, –City Manager — — — -- — — David K. Snyder, Johnson and Turner Susan Howl , From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:17 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Sports some complex Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno CED Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jenny Chapman [ mailto:ia.chapman(@comcast.netl Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:16 AM To: Edina Mail; ionibennettl2(@comcast.net; Mary Brindle; swensonannl @gmail.com; ioshsprague edinarealty.com Subject: Sports some complex Hello, I am an Edina resident and have 5 children that are active with Edina based sports. The activities range from, soccer, football, hockey and lacrosse. I strongly view the dome as an excellent opportunity for the City of Edina to continue to excel and provide ample opportunities for our youth and community to be active. Please support this project. Thank you for your consideration. Jenny Chapman 5721 Kemrich Drive Edina, MN 55439 612 - 325 -1363 1 Susan How From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:43 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Need the Dome ...._ Lynette Biunno, Receptionist '�; � .:�; + 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cI)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov —1 ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Eric Olson jmailto •ericolson333 @cjmail:coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Need the Dome Please support,the intiative for the Braemar Field Dome . We need this type of facilities /Fields. i Susan Howl , A From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:44 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Dome ,._:. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(ZbEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Broderick, Sean [ mailto : Sean. BrodericWchsinc.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:23 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2Cabcomcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague(a edinarealty.com; swensonanni @gmail.com Subject: Edina Dome Hello- I appreciate the fact that you continue to look at an indoor dome as a viable, necessary option for those of us that have children in multiple activities. Running over to Holy Angels to play in a soccer dome never made sense to us at all, and our kids are only 7 & 9 -the front end of the curve of the target market! _ This will NOT bean under -used facility, and is much needed. I realize it is not without challenges to get it done, but this is the type of project that we expect of our elected officials, and fellow Edinans! Have a great day, and thank you for your time. Debbie and Sean Broderick (and Tommy -9 & Billy -7) 6521 Limerick Dr. Edina, MN 55439 Sean Broderick CHS 5500 Cenex Dr. MS 365 Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 -1733 800 769 -1066 sean.broderick @chsinc.com This outbound email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Skyscan service. For more information please visit http: / /www.symanteccloud.com 1 ---------- Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:45 PM Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike lanes Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Ib" i1 i 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cD-EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Doug jmailto•dougdodge alyahoo.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:42 PM To: lisa kaczke ecm- inc.com; jloncl( edinamn.com; Edina Mail; jhovland(abedinamn.corri; Wayne Houle; Byron Theis; katiei lizzie2(wahoo.com Subject: Bike lanes I am but just one of the majority that wants our old streets back. The current set -up with the new bike lanes is ridiculous and dangerous. We all know that -- we've already had two car accidents that can be blamed on the redesigned streets. That's great that these bike lanes are modeled after successful lay -outs in Europe. Unfortunately, they don't translate very well into "American ". (After a couple years, many drivers are STILL struggling with the concept of roundabouts.) If an "advisory" telling motorists how to use a road needs to be posted on a huge sign there is obviously a design problem. Some people ride their bikes during the winter. How well will the new lanes work when there is a layer of ice /snow covering the fancy paint on the road? Will the bikers be "discriminated" against in the winter? What happens when the temporary markers on Wooddale are gone? Even bikeedina.org claims the new lanes go "against nearly 40 years of prevailing wisdom ". Change is hard and not always needed. No amount of "positive" propaganda from the task force or the city engineer can smooth over all of the obvious impossibility of trying to force a square peg into a round hole which is what this project attempts. This was a total waste of federal funding! I am not anti -bike; my family and I all ride bikes. But it seems as though the "bike task force" set out to fix something that wasn't really broken. Bicyclists and motor vehicle drivers have long co- existed under the old street designs. And there will always be incidents, it's the sad truth. These new lanes lack some important properties: Feasibility, practicality and safety. Let's cut our losses now and revert back to the safety of normal roads. We all make mistakes and the current bike lanes in Edina ARE a mistake. Happy Thanksgiving, Doug Kenyon 6100 Saint Johns Ave 952- 920 -0454 Susan *nw| From: Lynette Biunno on behalf n, Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19.un1u1u:4gPm Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FvV Edina Sports Dome Support nmtteBXunno, Receptionist oou*xromo1|mm000�un*000 | ...For Living, Lemming. Bai"inoFamffies & Doing Bmiiiess From: philip miller Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:24 AM To: Edina Mail; jon iben nettl 2(cbcomcast. net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague(cbedinarealty.com; swensonannl(acimail.com Subject: Edina Sports Dome Support I am a resident of Edina and the parent cf2 children that participate in multiple sports and activities. l am writing to express my support for building a sports dome in Edina. The donne provides numerous benefits for the city including: a place for winter activities and sports for children and adults and enhanced standard of living for our community. [ hope that you join me in my support of this initiative. Thank you, Phil (& Michele) Miller 7219 Lanham Ln, Edina ` 1 Susan Howl. From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:50 PM cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK Dome Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: The Laskins f mailto:rglaskin @hotmail.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:49 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Dome We support the Dome project in Edina. My kids regular participate in programs at Holy Angels in Richfield and Eden Prairie. We spend between north $1,000 a year in programs that a Dome in Edina could support. It would be great to have a multi -use facility in Edina. We support it! Roisin Laskin Cell: 612 - 240 -4609 1 Susan Howl Thomas lilies From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:59 PM To: Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Sports Dome... Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ? ( 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cD Edina MN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov .,.For hiving, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Tom Illies rmailto:tbillies@)fig05.comI Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:25 PM To: Edina Mail; ion ibennettl2C5comcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshspraaue(d)edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Edina Sports Dome... To current city council members, I am a 12 year resident of Edina and the parent of 4 children that participate in multiple sports and activities. My wife and I are neither from Edina, albeit MN, but had always looked to the city of Edina with admiration on many fronts. There is no doubt in my mind our community needs a dome ... none. The multiple athletic associations (I am currently an active member of the Edina Football Board) and other activities in dire need would make it financially feasible to build. The number of people in our city who would benefit from a dome i staggering. Thanks, Tom Thomas lilies District Manager 8441 Wayzata Blvd #220 Minneapolis, MN 55426 ;: t.; ;• Y o P: 763- 450 -0750 x11 F: 763 - 450 -0749 Susan Howl From: Lynette.Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 20124:16 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Why I signed -- This technology will unfairly w - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist (%' ,,' 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(a) Edina MN.aov www.EdinaMN.gov =' J :' For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Judy Johnson Lmailto•mail@change.orcll Sent: Friday, November 16,. 2012 11:37 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Why I signed -- This technology will unfairly Dear Mr. James Hovland (Mayor, City of Edina), I just signed Steve Kittleson's petition "Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC): Stop Building an Airplane Freeway Over Our Neighborhoods" on Change.org. Here's why I signed: This technology will unfairly burden us with more noise and more carbon dioxide emissions, leading to lower quality of health and lower property values. Sincerely, Judy Johnson Minneapolis, Minnesota There are now ^903 signatures on this petition. Read reasons why people are signing, and respond to Steve Kittleson by clicking here: oba„aP nra/nptitinnc/rnetronolitan- airport- commission - mac - stop - building -an- airplane - freeway oyer- our -nei ghborhoods ?response= 9e88bb8aff8b i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:19 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Why I signed -- affects my house, quality - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ? �l 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(- EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov �! For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jill DeSanto Lmailto:mailCd)change.orgl Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:37 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Why I signed -- affects my house, quality Dear Mr. James Hovland (Mayor, City of Edina), I just signed Steve Kittleson's petition "Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC): Stop Building an Airplane Freeway Over Our Neighborhoods" on Change.org. Here's why I signed: affects my house, quality of life and neighborhood Sincerely, Jill DeSanto Minneapolis, Minnesota There are now 904 signatures on this petition. Read reasons why people are signing, and respond to Steve Kittleson by clicking here: our - neighborhoods ?response= 9e88bb8aff8b Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:19 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina, compete in the Earth Hour City Challenge Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I' www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: theo teske (mailto:theo.teske @ gmail.coml Sent :.Friday, November 16, 201211:45 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina, compete in the Earth Hour City,Challenge Dear Mayor Hovland, I am 10 years old and am concerned about our future. As I am also an Edina resident, I'm writing to urge you to protect My family and our city from the consequences of extreme weather by participating in WWF's Earth Hour City Challenge, a competition between cities to prepare for a changing climate. If we participate, Edina could receive resources and gain recognition for our efforts to curb carbon pollution and prepare our community for the harmful consequences of climate change. More and more, we are facing heavier rainfall and dangerous flooding. As climate change gets worse, dangerous weather is getting more frequent or severe - or both. But we can take action to prepare for the changing weather such as improving air quality, protecting our water supplies, reducing flooding and making it easier for us as citizens to protect ourselves and our homes. If we take these actions, they will keep our families and community safer and healthier. How is our city preparing for these changes in climate? Are we doing enough? I think Edina should compete in WWF's Earth Hour City Challenge. I hope you will participate and protect my family and other residents of Edina by preparing for the extreme weather our community is facing. You can learn more at worldwildlife .org /citychallenge. Sincerely, Theo Teske 4705 Wliford Way Edina, MN 55435 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:21 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Why I signed -- There is no reason Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 lbiunnoAEdinaMN..qov I www.EdInaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Tim Keehn rmai Ito: mai l(a)cha ncie.orql Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:47 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Why I signed -- There is no reason Dear Mr. James Hovland (Mayor, City of Edina), I just signed Steve Kittleson's petition "Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC): Stop Building an Airplane Freeway Over Our Neighborhoods" on Change.org. Here's why I signed: There is no reason for extra noice in such a dense area. Sincerely, Tim Keehn Mpls, Minnesota There are now 908 signatures on this petition. Read reasons why people are signing, and respond to Steve Kittleson by clicking here: our -iieighborhoods?response=9e88bb8aff8b 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail .Sent: Monday, November 19, 201210:50 AM Vic: Susan Howl Subject: FW: sports dome <:_,•. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �@ 11 :0' 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 W Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Tara Johnson [mailto:twotdjs(&mac.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:17 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: sports dome ar Mayor Hovland, I am a resident of Edina and the parent of 4 very active children that participate in multiple sports and activities. I am writing to express my support for building a sports dome in Edina. The dome provides numerous benefits for the city including: a place for winter activities and sports for children and adults and enhanced standard of living for our community. I hope that you join me in my support of this initiative. Thank you, Tara and Troy Johnson and family 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:55 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: I support the sports dome -:. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6& Doing Business From: Christopher Boyer Lmailto•cwawboyer(&gmail.com1 Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:23 AM To: Edina Mail; ionibennettl2lacomcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague(aOedinarealty.com; swensonanni @cLmail.com Subject: I support the sports dome Hello Council members, I am a resident of Edina and the parent of two children that participate in multiple sports and activities. I am writing to express my support for building a sports dome in Edina. The dome provides numerous benefits for the city including: a place for winter activities and sports for children and adults and enhanced standard of living for our community. I hope that you join me in my support of this initiative. Thank you! Christopher Boyer 5615 Brookview Avenue Edina, MN 55424 S san Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:56 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Dome Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �F: ! 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ......:.... "'. IbiunnoCcaEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov J. - - ' For 1_iving, Ixarning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Dan Arom [mailto•arom.danC&gmail.coml Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:35 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina Dome Mayor Hovland, I would like to express my support towards the construction of a domed facility in Edina! I appreciate all of your efforts to make Edina a vibrant and multi - generational community. Growing up in Edina and living here for the better part of 25 years and being part of three generations living here, one of the truly great components of living in Edina are the facilities and activities that form this community and the bonds between residents. Facilities such as the proposed dome will serve so many individuals from multiple age groups, that I believe there is a wonderful opportunity to act on the proposal to build the facility. Sincerely, Dan Arom I Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:57 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction - objection to sidewalk Attachments: Photos Trillium and Hibiscus.pdf .;., Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r�C'7 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov = ...For. Living, Learning, Raising families Si Doing BiLsiness From Chuck Wojack [mailto:cwojack @Sebesta.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:41 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Kelley Wojack Subject: FW: Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction - objection to sidewalk Please forward to the Mayor and City Council regarding the public hearing regarding the BA -398 Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Improvements. Any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Chuck Wojack ;i si;':.. i..... �.;.i ^'w� i :i ;i';1....•34 i':'7ci tv1 952 2319.3616 1 F 651.6-34.7400 This message has been sent via the Internet. Internet communications are not secure against interception or modification. Sebesta Blomberg therefore cannot guarantee that this message has not been modified in transit. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. 'If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and destroy your copies of the message and any attached files. From: Chuck Wojack Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 7:15 PM To: 'WHoule @EdinaMN.gov' Cc: 'Kelley Wojack'; 'lyonthomash @MSN.com'; 'SAllison @EdinaMN.gov'; 'cmillner @EdinaMN.gov'; 'jcynor @EdinaMN.gov' Subject: FW: Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction - objection to sidewalk Wayne: I sent this to Jamie and hopefully he passed in on, but I wanted to make sure it is noted that there is strong opposition to the sidewalk in the Feasibility Report to be submitted to the City Council on November 20, 2012. The more I look into this sidewalk, the more I am convinced it is the wrong thing to do. Also based on the timing of events, I am concerned there is not enough time for the due diligence required to determine if and where sidewalks would best benefit the neighborhood, and how to incorporate the sidewalks into a neighborhood that was not designed for them and has evolved without them. What was noted as a recommendation in the ETC meeting on 10/25 as a suggestion, now appears to be in the project. Based on the typical sections and the plans presented at the November 7 meeting, I believe there are issues with our property (7212 Trillium) and the property at 4754 Hibiscus that are not addressed. As noted below, there is a significa, slope to the curb which will need to be addressed. I appreciate you looking into this and would like the opportunity to discuss this with you if you are available. You can reach me,on my cell phone at 952 - 239 -3816. Please confirm receipt of this e-mail. Sincerely, Chuck Wojack Prl.ler.i t':lanaoer sc,t: rata ,:real ; P 651.634.7 27 5 M 552.239.3316 1 F 651.634.7400 This message has been sent via the Internet. Internet communications are not secure against interception or modification. Sebesta Blomberg therefore cannot guarantee that this message has not been modified in transit. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and destroy your copies of the message and any attached files. From: Chuck Wojack Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 6:01 AM To: 'jcynor @EdinaMN.gov' Cc: 'Kelley Wojack' Subject: RE: Lake Edina Roadway Reconstruction - objection to sidewalk Chad I am unavailable to attend the informational meeting on Nov. 7, 2012 and wanted to make my objection noted regarding the ETC recommendation to install a sidewalk along the east side of Normandale Road from West 70`h Street to Hibisicus Avenue and along the north side Hibiscus Ave from Normandale Road to West Shore Drive. We oppose the sidewalk on multiple levels, as a home owner, as a resident of the neighborhood and tax payer. 1. We have been residents of Edina living at 7212 Trillium Lane for over 15 years. The proposed sidewalk will run along the south edge of our property and we feel would cause undue hardship to us a residents and reduce our property value. The proposed sidewalk would require significant modifications to our property including loss of mature trees, modification of the existing grade and relocation of a stucco fence at a minimum. The grade slopes considerably from our fence to the top of the existing curb (over 2 ft drop in 9 ft). Without seeing a design, there appears to be considerable technical challenges due to the grade in our yard and adjacent lots. See attached photos. 2. As a resident of the neighborhood, we use the streets regularly for walking our dogs and jogging. I am also a regular bike commuter (2 -3 times per week weather permitting to work). We use the streets extensively in our neighborhood and we do not think a sidewalk would be a= benefit to 'our neighborhood. The streets are wide enough for us to safely walk our dogs on Normandale Road and Hibiscus Ave. Our view appears to be consistent with our neighbors :§,d 1 8'50 of the residents surveyed indicated that they see a need to add sidewalk in our neighborhood. 3. As a tax payer, we '-do not think it is prudent to spend money on a sidewalk the residents do not have a need for and or want. There are surely more pressing concerns we can spend our money on. In summary, we think the sidewalk would cause us undue harm; is not needed or wanted by the residents and is a waste of tax payers funds. I appreciate the city looking at options, but we do not think this option is worthy of future consideration. As stated above, I am unavailable to attend due to travels for business, but I am extremely interested in finding out why this is being considered and what the process is oppose this. Please feel free to forward this to the ETC and others as you feel appropriate. Any questions, please contact us at your convenience. Since Chuck and Kelley Wojack 7212 Trillium Lane Home Phone — 952 - 927 -7919 Chuck's mobile - 952 - 239 -3816 Corner of Trillium Lane and Hibiscus -51 south edge of 7212 Trillium Lane 00 . Corner of Trillium Lane and Hibiscus -51 south edge of 7212 Trillium Lane Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:58 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Sport dome... = Lynette Biunno, Receptionist i'' 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(&- EdinaMN.gov ! www.EdinaMN.gov _i ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Chris Blum jmailto•blumtown5 @yahoo.com1 Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:43 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina Sport dome... Hello James. Just wanted to offer my two scents on the Athletic dome idea ... I currently have 3 boys under age 12. Between the three of them they play about seven different sports. As parents we'd love to have something closer to home and also agree it would be great for them to have the year round option to practice or do sport camps during the winter. Our vote is a resounding YES for the Edina Sport dome! Thank you, Chris & Lee Blum i Susan How) From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail :Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:02 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Dome Lynette Biunno, Receptionist .' 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoC�EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Brian J Kruse jrmailto•brian.i kruseCaoampf.coml Sent: Monday, November, 19, 2012 10:47 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Dome Mayor, I have three kids in Edina athletics. After traveling to all surrounding communities for events, I can tell you that Edina is lacking in not having a dome. It is time to make the investment and get it built. Thanks for your consideration. Brian Kruse 5029 Bedford Ave *********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e -mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you." 1 Susan Howl r- From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:17 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Sports Dome Support Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f�G'; 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 �, - :D Ibiunno(@EdinaMN.aov 1 www.EdinaMN.aov -' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Klemmensen, Todd Lmailto•Todd Klemmensen(5)mts.com1 Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:07 AM To: swensonanni (ftmail.com; t shsprague@edinareal_ty.com; Mary Brindle; Joni ben nettl2C)comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: Edina Sports Dome Support Dear Edina City Council: I am a resident of Edina and the parent of 2 children that participate in multiple sports and activities. I am writing to express my support for building a sports dome in Edina. The dome provides numerous benefits for the city including: a place for winter activities and sports for children and adults and enhanced standard of living for our community. I hope that you join me in my support of this initiative. Thank you, Todd Klemmensen 1 0 17-/ C� ruG i� THANK YOU Lj,�n��s.�j '� ' �" � ��'� �' s `�° � � ,►-,�,�,�. mil%' � . Susan Howl } From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 3:14 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: ATfN: Mayor Hovland Attachments: RNAVs noise contours.pdf Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 'Iry1 ` 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 `� Ibiunno cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov _ ,tf -: ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & . i ?oing 13tvsiness From: Mandelman, Elizabeth [mai Ito: Elizabeth. Mandel man (5)mai1.house.clov1 Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 2:46 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: ATTN: Mayor Hovland Dear Mayor Hovland: Congressman Ellison has alerted me to your concerns regarding the current RNAV proposal being considered by MAC. As Congressman Ellison's transportation staff person, I wanted to let you know that our office has been regularly updated on the relevant issues concerning the RNAV proposal. I'm attaching to this email a map that you may find useful. It illustrates the current MSP noise contours and the proposed RNAV contours. It appears from the map that the concentration of noise will remain fairly stable. I hope that this information is helpful. If you'd like to talk about your specific concerns, please feel free to give me a ca at 202.225.4755. Best, Liz Elizabeth Mandelman - Legislative Assistant Office of Congressman Keith Ellison (MN -05) 1027 Longworth House Office Building 202.225.4755 • ellison.house.gov 1 1 = = Susan How! From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail 'Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:14 PM Cc: Susan Howl . Subject: FW: Why I signed -- I maoved from a Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(DEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ' = For Living, learning, It<aising Families &Doing Business From: Bev Turk ,[mailto•mailCa)change.or41 Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:35 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Why I signed -- I maoved from a Dear Mr. James Hovland (Mayor, City of Edina), I just signed Steve Kittleson's petition "Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC : Stop Building an Airplane Freeway Over Our Neighborhoods" on Change.org. Here's why I signed: I maoved from a neighborhood where the airplane noise was intolerable - don't want any more of that. Sincerely, Bev Turk Minneapolis, Minnesota There are now 901 signatures on this petition. Read reasons why people are signing, and respond to Steve Kittleson by clicking here: .. _, -:— --+ ,.,,,, —, oc, ,,,,- mn,,- (ztn„- h„ilclinu- an- aimlane- freewav -over- our neighborhoods ?response= 9e88bb8aff8b i Susan Howl I # From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 3:03 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Why I signed — I live in close - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Ih?; 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I I IbiunnoCrDEdinaMN.pov I Wvrw.EdinaMN.gov _.._. -J - ,_ 1, ...For Living, Learning, B wising Families & Doing Business From: Susan McShane Lmailto•mail(@chanae.oral Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:33 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Why I signed -- I live in close Dear Mr. James Hovland (Mayor, City of Edina), I just signed Steve Kittleson's petition "Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC : Stop Building an Airplane Freewav Over Our Neighborhoods" on Change.org. Here's why I signed: I live in close proximity to TWO of the proposed new flight pattern "freeways ". You've got to be kidding!! Sincerely, Susan McShane Minneapolis, Minnesota ... __ _ There are now 900 signatures on this petition. Read reasons why people are signing, and respond to Steve Kittleson by clicking here: httn: / /www.change ory /petitions /metropolitan- airport- commission- mac - stop - building -an- airplane- freewal our - neighborhoods ?response= 9e88bb8aff8b 1 I I Figure 17: 2011 Actual Noise Contours and 2011 RNAV Adjusted Noise Contours . .. . ...... 17 q 39.4 Acre Reduction in the 60+ DNL ( D" '-.ii W- .7s.: Ji 11J a" 13 ij 1j. } f! I 111 1. J 1 P k I 1JJ1. ..LJ U. . ..... .... Noise Contours i7*! RNAV Contours M 2011 Actual Contours 0 L "IF, 2 MA.. A; U V --- H09 11 t S ....... V 70 DNL 65 DNL t / I ' 60 DNL Eagan Comparison of 2011 Actual and RNAV Adjusted Noise Contour Acreages 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total 2011 Actual 5,733.5 2,459.8 808.8 578.8 9,580.8 2011 RNAV �. 5,42� 7 3.1 576.7 9,541.4 ' . 8 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 2:59 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: 25 more people signed: Kyle G, Robert Harvey <• Lynette Biunno, Receptionist FIi 4'.:• 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ,yL {{ �.:: • Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Susan McShane [mailto:mail change.orgl Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:33 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 25 more people signed: Kyle G, Robert Harvey 25 people recently add their names to Steve Kittleson's petition "Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC): Stop Building Airplane Freeway Over Our Neighborhoods ". That means more than 500 people have signed on. There are now 900 signatures on this petition. Read reasons why people are signing, and respond to Steve Kittleson by clicking here: http• / /www change org /petitions /metr politan- airport- commission- mac - stop- buiIding- an- aimlane- freeway -over- our- neighborhoods ?response= 9e88bb8aff8b . Dear Mr. James Hovland (Mayor, City of Edina), The FAA wants to install Performance -Based Navigation (PBN) technology, which will redirect and increase the number of flights over our neighborhoods. This technology will unfairly burden us with more noise and more carbon dioxide emissions, leading to lower quality of health and lower property values. The FAA needs approval from the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) to move forward with the plan, but they have NOT provided enough time or information for the public to completely understand the impact of these changes. We urge the MAC to vote against PBN technology at the November 19, 2012 meeting, delaying launch of the PBN technology until 2014 so the public has more time to adequately evaluate the proposed changes to our neighborhoods. Sincerely, 876. Kyle G Minneapolis, Minnesota 877. Robert Harvey minneapolis, Minnesota 878. Sam Eberhart Minneapolis, Minnesota 879. Alicia Liddle Minneapolis, Minnesota 880. Jonna Connelly Minneapolis, Minnesota 881. Kathleen Muffly Minneapolis, Minnesota 882. kathie smith minneapolis, Minnesota 883. Chris Tripp Minneapolis, Minnesota 884. Robert Reiling Minneapolis, Minnesota 885. Mary Vrabel Minneapolis, Minnesota 886. Mary Arneson Minneapolis, Minnesota 887. Ryan Plewacki Minneapolis, Minnesota 888. Megan Kuhl - Stennes Minneapolis, Minnesota h 889. Pamela Schuh Minneapolis, Minnesota 890. Shireen Stone Minneapolis, Minnesota 891. Peter West Minneapolis; Minnesota 892. Kelly Gilbertson MPLS, Minnesota 893. alicia rae Minneapolis, Minnesota 894. Daniel Harrell Minneapolis, Minnesota 895. Philip Stanchfield Edina, Minnesota 896. Mark nissen Minneapolis, Minnesota 897. Launa Ellison Minneapolis, Minnesota 898. sarah caswell st.louis park, Minnesota 899. Katherine Lust Minneapolis, Minnesota 900. Susan McShane Minneapolis, Minnesota 2 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL October 9, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:06 pm II. WELCOME NEW STUDENT MEMBERS Chair Steel welcomed new student member Yasmeen Almog III. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Dan Peterson, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Almog, O'Leary Cathy Cella arrived at 7:55 pm IV. APPROVAL OFMEETINGAGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes:- Dan- Peterson; Deeds,- Jones,- Gieseke, Steel, Kathryn-Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto Motion Carried V. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Ayes: Dan Peterson, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto Motion Carried VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. Garden Park Public Hearing Regarding Baseball Field Renovations John Wright; indicated he is not a member of the Edina Baseball. Association. (EBA) but does have a son who is now, 16 and has played baseball. Mr. Wright gave a power_ point presentation. He informed the Park Board that Garden Park is built on. road construction landfill and,when there is a moderate,rainfall the fields are not good and they would love to renovate the playing surface and solve the drainage and playa bility .issues, that are currently there. In addition, they would like to improve the aesthetics of the field as well as have some player improvements. He noted the fields for the younger kids are more than adequate but as they get older it's important for them to have several fields that they can play on that meet the size standard and the amenities standard. He added they have had trouble with the school fields as far as keeping them mowed during the summer and on more than one occasion he has taken his own Toro and mowed the fields but try to do their best with the school fields they are able to use. Mr. Wright informed the Park Board of a few proposed improvements: dugouts, batting cages and modifications to the fencing. He then went over a quick summary of what has been proposed and put into the grant as part of the Hennepin County Youth Sports Program which includes taking out the infield and replacing it with sand peat material so the infield can drain. Also, put drain tile in the s outfield, re -grade and plant new grass with an irrigation system (the current one has not worked for several years). In addition, the backstop would be heightened and the chain link fence would be raised; he commented that Mr. Keprios suggested black vinyl fencing because it is more aesthetically appealing to the neighborhood. Also a place for pitchers to warm up inside the fence along with dugouts and a shed on one side and possibly a very small concession stand. In addition, put in batting cages, an' electronic scoreboard and some bleachers behind the fence. Mr. Wright indicated there is a lot going on at Garden Park every night during the summer and they did stress in the grant what Garden Park is used for and that is for a certain age group for baseball as well as all families that use Garden Park for other sports and in general. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that the total estimated cost of construction is $382,660 and with a $100,000 from the EBA that leaves them with a total cost of $282,660 which they submitted the grant for last week. She explained that staff did make a $100,000 CIP request for this just in case they receive partial grant funding and not the whole $282,660. Member Gieseke asked how it can cost $5,000 for a flagpole to which Ms. Kattreh replied that question did come up amongst their group and is not quite sure other than it is a construction estimate but assumes it must include footings, possible lighting and up to three flagpoles which can cost up to $1,500 each. Member Segreto asked how many of their baseball fields have electronic scoreboards, what is the useful life and what maintenance is involved. Ms. Kattreh replied she would need to refer to park maintenance staff for those answers but would expect it to last between 10 and 15 years and added that the four fields at the Courtney ball fields each has an electronic scoreboard. Brad Burley, EBA Board Member, indicated they are pushing 15 to 20 years with the scoreboard on Courtney Field #4. Member Kathryn Peterson indicated she knows there was a lot of damage done by vehicles this past spring and asked if fences will be constructed in such a way so vehicles cannot get through. Ms. Kattreh replied they are planning to put up a fence that would open up to allow vehicles to have access; however, when the fence is closed neighbors would still have access to the field when it's not being used in a scheduled manner. Member Jones asked how many games are being played on that field to which Mr. Wright replied approximately 90 to 100 games from May through the end of July and that does not include practices. Member Kathryn Peterson added that the high school starts using it in April for their sophomore and JV games. Member Jones asked what happens if they don't get the grant money to which Ms. Kattreh responded the first thing they need to determine is if they receive funding through the CIP. If grant funding is not received, we will sit down with the EBA and decide if they still want to make the $100,000 contribution and then determine how they could prioritize and phase in the improvements. Member Jones asked if there would be adequate parking to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes, there is plenty of parking for what they have available as far as field space. Casey Hankinson, 6615 Parkwood Lane, indicated he has played many years of baseball and thinks Garden Park is severely underutilized from a playability standpoint and certainly could use an upgrade. He drives by Garden Park many times and does see water on the fields to the point where other fields become impacted and thinks whatever improvements made to Garden Park are to be applauded. He congratulated EBA on donating $100,000 towards the project and as a resident he would be thrilled and thinks it would be a real perk to have another fine, outstanding facility in Garden Park. Brad Burley, 4510 Arden, informed the committee he has been involved in baseball in the community for a very long time and as sports have grown in the community with lacrosse, soccer, softball, etc., the erosion of the baseball fields in the community has impacted their ability to practice. Therefore, when Garden Park is shut down for a period of time there really is nowhere else to go because the fields at Courtney are for games only and there are not a lot of 90' baseball fields to practice on or reschedule games and it's really putting a crunch into the organization. Jeff May, 5724 Dale Avenue, President of the EBA, thanked Ms. Kattreh and staff for all of the hard work they put into the grant application. He noted that in a number of aspects he thinks it reflects how good of a project it is for the community. It first reflects the cooperation between the EBA and the City coming together with FBA's contribution and the City's help with the grant and in putting together a terrific plan that will really serve the community. He indicated they've had a lot of discussions about field capacity and the growth of athletics in the community and the need to add field capacity in which this a project that will dramatically improve the usability and capacity of Garden Park and hopes the Park Board'will support this project. Keelin Kane, 5533 Warden Avenue., informed the Park Board that she and many other neighbors use the park for things other than sports, they like to walk and enjoy the ambiance of having a park in their neighborhood. She indicated she is all for sports and thinks it's delightful to hear jolly sport behavior and laughing during the summer; however, one concern she has is traffic although it doesn't sound like there will be an increase in traffic. She commented she would like to hear a little more about the terms of a better facility because it may eventually cause people to want more use of the field and night games and she is concerned about the night sky and the lights that may be put up and so forth. Member Hulbert asked if it is necessary to illuminate the flags if that is what part of the plan is to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes. Member Dan Peterson commented that he thinks the other option is to spend $150 on a good flag pole that is in a stand and take it out of the storage area for the games and put it back into storage when the game is over. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, that they approve this with the elimination of the flagpole in the project. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto Motion Carried. VH.B. Walnut Ridge Shelter Building Winter Lights Holli Hankinson, 6615 Parkwood Lane, informed the Park Board that last year she came up with the idea of wouldn't it be neat if the warming house and adjacent tree at Walnut Ridge Park were professionally lit with white Christmas lights if the neighborhood was willing to pay for them. She pointed out she started a petition and has gathered 21 names of neighbors who are willing to support it and that she tried to contact most of the neighbors that are in direct sight of the.lights. She indicated that she has contacted three different vendors that would be professionally lighting them and they came up with the cost of $1,200. She stated that with Park; Board approval she will then try to gather donations from the neighbors. She indicated that the rink is 'a neighborhood gathering place and so anything to make it a little more festive is what they thought so they are proposing to have the lights lit the end of November until the rinks shut down which she believes is February Member Segreto commented that she feels a little conflicted with the proposal because there have been discussions about how the City should strive for a certain sense of uniformity in some of the park structures, being the shelter buildings. However, she does like the idea of personalizing park structures to add to the festivities and sees that as important to the feeling you get in the neighborhood. She stated that in looking at where the signatures have been obtained in connection with the petition many of them are not along the perimeter of the park and those are the people she would see as being most affected by the lights. Chair Steel asked if the donations were collected would this need to be brought back to the Park Board. Ms. Kattreh replied she would ask for approval stating if they receive the donations you would give the approval to do this and would also want the City Council's approval, on this item. She noted if Park Board gives approval she would give the neighborhood another month to raise the funds prior to City Council approval. Chair Steel asked if they would be able to have a- public hearing or notify the houses in that area to which Ms. Kattreh responded they had not planned on doing a public hearing but if that is the process the Park Board would like to take she would be happy to do it. Chair Steel asked about the electricity costs to which Ms. Kattreh replied the proposal is for LED lights which are very efficient; however, without the use of LED lights they would not have considered this proposal. Member Gieseke commented that he loves the lights but if there are some concerns would you be open to having the holiday lights on in December and go two weeks into January or some kind of combination. Ms. Hankinson replied they would consider anything to have the winter lights. She added there are quite a few Jewish people in their community and she, has talked to .them and gathered their opinion and they are all fine with it, but winter lights is what they are thinking. Mr. Hankinson informed the Park Board. that it is - probably 75 to 100 yards to the nearest residence and the hockey rink is lit to full exposure. He commented,if there was a timer on. the lights he thinks there would be very little impact from those actual lights to the residents and added if there was one resident inclose proximity .and did not like it they would- certainly not want to put them up. They really would like to have some holiday cheer. around the ice area that everyone uses at night and it's just a way to spruce it up through the winter. Member Deeds commented this is not a permanent change to the park in any,way,,shape or form and if the neighborhood) supports it and is willing to fund it he can't possibly see the objection to it. He indicated that he', does think there needs to be some kind of a process to let the neighborhood know this is going to be happening. Member Jones asked what the $1,200 pays for. Ms. Hankinson replied for the first year it would be putting LED lights on three sides of the warming house and one',of the adjacent trees, installation, removal, storage and any maintenance throughout the time frame they are. -lit. Member Jones asked if they are just proposing this for this year to which Ms. Hankinson replied'that is•something she wanted to ask. If they do get approval do they need to come back every year and go through the same process? Member Jones asked•who would be the party that would be donating, is it your neighborhood association? Ms: Hankinson replied the Parkwood Knolls Association she believes is donating $300 out of the $1,200 and the rest would come -from neighbors door to door. She also informed the Park Board there is a Parkwood Knolls newsletter which goes to the entire neighborhood and she put an article in that newsletter asking if anyone is opposed, has concerns or questions to contact.her. Chair Steel asked Ms. Kattreh what she would recommend goingforward if they make a recommendation tonight. Ms. Kattreh replied she thinks it would be a good idea to look at it again before they approve it next year by a neighborhood mailing asking f&r feedback. Member Hulbert asked if they approve this couldn't they just say if you are doing the same thing -next year and as long as the intention doesn't change they could do the same to which Ms. Kattreh replied absolutely. Member Jones noted that she would request that the City create some donation agreement so that the City would be indemnified from any problems that the contractor might experience or anyone else might experience from this. Ms. Kattreh replied that's true and they could make sure that the potential contractor is licensed, bonded and insured. 4 Member Hulbert made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, to approve the request with the stipulation that in subsequent years they notify staff of the intention to do the same and not expand it. Member Deeds noted that he does think they probably need to put a notification out to the neighborhood in terms of process. Member Hulbert asked how wide they would do it to which Member Deeds replied he would say the neighbors around the perimeter of the park. Member Hulbert commented that Christmas lights are up all season and he doesn't know what the disagreement is going to be to which Member Deeds responded he agrees; he just thinks legally they probably have to. Member Kathryn Peterson stated that the rinks lights are far bigger than the little LEDs. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert Nays: Segreto Motion Carried. VII.C. 2013 =2017 Enterprise Capital Improvement Plans The Enterprise Managers gave power -point presentations explaining their CIP. items. Edina Aquatic Center — Susan Faus — Replace Heaters, Pool Deck Repairs, Bathhouse Roof and Other Improvements, Replace Pool Filters and Main Pool Boiler. Member Hulbert asked Ms. Faus if they have looked at repairing the posts to which she replied they have but because they are buckling straight down into the concrete it was recommended that they replace the posts at the same time. - Member Deeds asked if the pool itself is still chlorine based or have they gone to a salt base system to which Ms. Faus replied it's chlorine based. He asked if they have considered going to a salt based system to which Ms. Faus replied they have not but it is probably something they will take a look at in the next few years. Member Deeds explained the reason he asks is given the changes that are being made with the filters would it make sense to do something along those lines at the same time. Ms. Faus replied it is certainly something they can look into. Member Jones asked Ms. Kattreh to explain the new process and what those numbers mean as well as how it is going to function in terms of getting things done' during the year. Ms. Kattreh explained they are entering into a two year CIP process and how it works is staff was asked a couple of months ago; as a department, to prioritize all of their capital improvement projects. She noted the Parks Department, including the enterprise facilities, had approximately 78 to 80 capital improvement projects which were ranked in order from 1 to 80. Staff then submitted those with their descriptions to the Finance Department and the City Manager for their review and at that time took all of the projects in addition to all of the departments within the.City and gave them priority rankings. They then ranked all of the city's capital improvements projects on a priority scale from 1 to 7 and those items ranked from 1 to 5 are likely to receive funding between now and 2015. Those items.ranked 6 or 7 are still ranked as important projects but they don't have the funding in the next two year cycle to be able to fund those. She explained from the proposed CIP that she emailed to the Park Board three weeks ago was the plan staff submitted because she wanted to give everyone an opportunity, with plenty of time to be able to review all of those projects. She commented that she realizes it's a lot of information and between then and October 2 "d when the City Council and staff had first opportunity to review that priority system was where the draft proposal came into play; therefore, you will see a difference in the two proposals. She indicated that the City Council is very interested in hearing Park Board's input and feedback and just because a project is ranked a 6 or 7 doesn't necessarily mean that it's not going to receive funding because City Council needs to hear if you feel some of those projects are more important. Ms. Kattreh pointed out now having said that there is a finite source of funds to be able to fund these projects which is why they are not all receiving 1 through 5. 5 Member Dan Gieseke commented the wall of the new Flowrider that faces 66`'' Street is all grey cement and asked if they've talked about beautifying that up. Ms. Faus replied they have planted some trees and shrubs along that area and they will look at painting it or something to at least change the color. Braemar Arena — Susie Miller — Wall System Repairs, Replace Zamboni, Make -up Water Tanks, Low E Ceiling Replacement/West Arena, Painting East Arena, Ballet Room Remodel, Low E Ceiling Replace/East Arena and Parking Lot Resurfacing. Member Kathryn Peterson asked what is going to be painted because she is wondering about the $25,000 price tag. Ms. Miller replied it is the walls on the backside and because they are concrete block it is more expensive because they need to use higher quality paint so they don't have peeling issues. Member Kathryn Peterson asked if the price to replace the Zamboni included netting out the trade -in value. Ms. Miller replied no and explained they just replaced one this year and it actually netted out to be approximately $108,000 with tax after trade -in value which cost a lot less than they expected. She stated that she is new to the business and it's her understanding they can fluctuate in price and other staff felt they should keep it at $140,000 and hopefully they will have the same success. Member Jacobson asked in regards to the Low E Ceiling Replacement are there other alternatives besides that fabric because it seems like spraying foam may last longer and be more energy efficient. Ms. Miller replied that this has been determined to be the best. She indicated that recently three of her staff went to a conference where they found this other product where it was framed in rather than the cabling and sounds like it's going to be less expensive. She added that Mankato State University just installed it in their arenas last year and have zero issues, it's super durable and they could not say enough great things about it. Member Almog commented she was a figure skater for a long time and remembers the "barn" and from her perspective she would support painting it because she remembers practicing in there and it was pretty sketchy. Member O'Leary indicated he was a hockey player and also remembers practicing in the East Arena and never looked forward to those because it seemed darker, not as friendly and practices weren't run as well and there was a weird vibe going on. He also noted that he remembers a painting on the wall of a figure skater. Ms. Miller replied that they will be putting both a hockey player and figure skater on the wall; however, they do want the figure skaters to feel like it's their home because the hockey community has kind of taken over the other two arenas with the number of state championship banners that Edina continues to accumulate. She does agree they need to make it a little more multi- purpose. Member Dan Peterson asked Ms. Miller if she had any comments on the priority rating system and does she agree with all of them to which she replied they are very happy. Member Jones stated she knows there are going to be other capital improvements that came with the Hornet's Nest which were not part of last year's CIP and asked Ms. Miller to talk about that. Ms. Miller responded they are part of the bonding so there is going to be a portion of the bonding. Those items are relocating the Zamboni room, which provides for safety. That's moving it from. the south end to the north end which provides for safety. The staff are very excited about that. The railing is under construction right now there a little bit of a challenge because of the wall but it will happen. It's just a matter of figuring out some minor details. That's to help accommodate the seating that was taken out for the walkway. The ADA pathway was completed. We shut down for the month of September they had to open it up the last sat in September because hockey tryouts were going on. They achieved the goal and it opened on time and it's beautiful. D Member Gieseke asked what the expected life span is of the more durable ceiling replacement material. Ms. Miller replied she does not know but the person kept saying "lifetime warranty" so she is assuming close to 20 years but will double check•on that. Ms. Kattreh asked Ms. Miller to talk about her great plan for repurposing the office and concession area. Ms. Miller informed the Park Board they have funding from a surplus from 2011 so they are going to remodel the concession stand and administrative area. She explained when they took over the concession stand on July I' it felt very separate from the administrative area. They could not cross utilize staff. She explained the plan to the Park Board and noted the benefit is they will be able to share staff and therefore may only need to schedule one person in each area. In addition, the new plan is actually a little more welcoming and staff will now be more out in the lobby area. She pointed out that another benefit is they are going to open up some.space that could be used for meeting space and possibly put in a sofa and chair and maybe video equipment and books for coaches. She indicated she may actually have, somebody that will help with the funding of it. She commented since kids spend so much time at the arena she thought it could also be a place where hockey players and figure skaters can go and hangout with friends, kind of like a second home. She stated the goal is if it's their second home they will look to them not only for their regular season ice but for offseason training as well. Chair Steel indicated the East.Arena and Ballet Room costs are the same but are different priority levels and .wondered if there was some strategy behind that. Ms. Miller replied she wasn't involved in the prioritizing but thinks the benefit of the Ballet Room is they will be able to generate additional revenue by offering classes as well as renting it out for meeting space. She stated it is functional the way it is right now but would first like to make a statement to the figure skaters and hockey community by brightening up the East Arena and making it a place they want to be. Braemar Golf Course — Todd Anderson — Driving Range Expansion, Carpeting, Slit Drainage 3 Fairways, Clubhouse Roof Replacement, Cart Path Repair/Expansion, Maintenance Equipment Replacement, Tee Renovation, Clubhouse Remodel. Member Hulbert stated their packet shows the driving range expansion in 2015 but the presentation showed 2013 -2014 and asked if there was a change. Mr. Anderson responded in 2013 they have $800,000 and in 2014 they have $200,000. Member Hulbert asked how they will break that up over two years; are you going to keep the range in operation and just do half at a time. Mr. Anderson replied the bulk.of the construction will be in 2013 but they are trying to reasonably split out some of the costs that are going to be on the tail end in 2014. Mr. Hulbert asked when they hope to break ground to which Mr. Anderson replied if it's approved they would be looking at September. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that ,as staff they ranked this very high in their priority but on the draft CIP it's ranked a 7 so at this point in the process there is currently no funding in the CIP for it. However, they are working with the City Manager and the Finance Department to try to come up. with some viable options to get this project taken care of. Member Cella stated that in her packet she does not see a listing for the clubhouse remodel to which Mr. Anderson replied that was his error, he did not submit a form for that. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board this is a slightly different funding source, it doesn't come from the construction fund like the majority of their projects, it comes from the endowment. The way it works is they still need to submit the CIP forms to show that it's coming out of the endowment. She noted that was the piece they missed and apologized for the error and added this is also a new process for staff so they've made 'a few errors but they are working with the Finance Department to see if they can still make that addition to the CIP for this next year. Member Cella asked what the total cost of the clubhouse is.to which Mr. Anderson replied phase I would be $75,000 and the rest would be tables and chairs for approximately $30,000 to $35,000. Member Cella asked is that well within the Memorial Fund to which it was noted yes. 7 Member O'Leary asked if putting up a big net to block the golf balls from going any further was an option to which Mr. Anderson replied people really don't like netting because anytime you have limited flight or limited club selection it is not optimal and people do not care for it. Member Dan Peterson asked Mr. Anderson approximately what's the revenue from the driving range this year to which Mr. Anderson responded to date they are at $287,000. Member Dan Peterson stated that it seems to him that a priority 7 is wrong for something that brings in that kind of revenue. He asked if that million dollars includes the redo of the executive course to make it all par 3 as well as. close the two holes to which Mr. Anderson replied yes. Member Dan Peterson' asked what the procedure is to see if there is support to change the priority ranking on that item. Ms. Kattreh replied it is a hot topic and they have had a lot of discussion about it at the City Council work session on October 2 "d. ,She stated that as she had mentioned they are working on trying to determine other potential funding sources, even bonding and phasing the project. Ms. Kattreh indicated that it is important for her to mention it is a million dollar project and the overall CIP budget for two years for the entire City. is 2.6 million dollars and that's a problem. She commented that it's not that the City doesn't value or see the need for this project, it's purely a matter of money; however, it is very important that the City Council hear your concerns and desires. Member Jones commented that last y ear this project was only going to cost about half of that and asked what happened. Mr. Anderson explained that $550,000 was actually the estimate they had and that the National Golf Foundation's estimate was $300,000 to $400.000' with. the thinking that part of it could be done in -house which they have found out that is not the case; we really don't have the equipment. The cost estimates c_ ame from the golf course architect and he is'currently in the process of getting two _ - -. _ - _ -- additional cost estimates so they should have a betterr feel but again the range is $799,000 to 1 3- million. Member Jones indicated that she understands they are going to increase the size as well as be able to give, the tees a break and asked Mr. Anderson how much revenue he thinks they would be getting if they? were to put this in. Mr. Anderson replied no.formal'estimates have been made but he is guessing on'the r_F . capacity on the public range during peak times would increase'by at least 20% which would be, approximately $75,000 to $100,000,.but more so than the capacity is the improved turf quality because. They are losing play to other ranges. He indicated they are a one stop destination and if they have a quality range it would exceed what you would think as far as increased capacity. Member Jones asked if they will be able to completely redo the golf dome without any capital improvement. Mr. Anderson replied the insurance money will not totally recover the replacement cost but they are hoping to get the dome up and running in March, not the-building but the dome itself', He added it's an ongoing battle with the insurance company and there are additional expenses thatthey never anticipated as far. as building codes. Ms. Kattreh added they are still trying to determine the overall cost for the replacement of the golf dome and it is another one of those items that might get added to the CIP at some point in the process before final approval in December. Member Gieseke asked if there is any capacity to increase fees if they would complete this project as you see surrounding competitive driving ranges to -which Mr. Anderson replied definitely. Member Gieseke asked by how much, what percentage. Mr. Anderson responded he thinks they could definitely go up to $9.00 for a large bucket once they have a better range with better turf. Member Gieseke asked Mr. Anderson if he could imagine a way to phase this in one piece at a time to which Mr. Anderson replied they really haven't had an architect look at that and tell them what they can do. Chair Steel asked what the limit is on the CIP and how it is determined -and if there is a surplus does that affect the current CIP or are there opportunities to push projects forward; how does the City go about that for each of the different areas. Ms. Kattreh replied that some of the surplus does go into the CIP and there are several different sources of funds for the Construction Fund and in the next year they will have approximately 2.6 million dollars from a variety of sources that will make up the capital improvement pool of money. She indicated there is the ability to move projects forwards or backwards 8 to try to achieve different goals at different times; therefore, if you see projects as a priority in 2013 and they are ranked in 2015 those are comments that the City Council would like to hear. Chair Steel asked if the items listed for 2015 through 2017 are based on projections. Ms. Kattreh . explained they are based on staff recommendations; however, if you see a project in 2015 with a rating of 6 or 7 it likely means it was a project that staff had rated sooner and it was moved up to 2015 for discussion in the next two year CIP cycle. She.pointed out you will see a lot of the projects in 2015 through 2017 have a lower ranking because that-is when staff felt that they should be replaced. Chair Steel asked if they can expect the funding in 2015 through 2017 to stay the same or you have no idea to which Ms. Kattreh replied they have no idea. Member Kathryn Peterson indicated there seems to be ample demand for the driving range and it appears there is no increase in the driving range fees; however, it looks like there are other communities that do charge more and that there is a lot of demand regardless of the condition of the driving.range. She stated that it seems to her you might be able to increase the fees-a little bit and maybe start building a fund to help pay for some of it. Mr. Anderson replied that peak demand times are very interesting in that you could be hitting off of concrete and it really wouldn't matter; however, the rest of the time people are cognizant of the pricing and unless they went to different pricing for peak times and non -peak times they would have a hard time with that. Member Hulbert asked how often people call to ask if they are hitting off of mats or grass to which Mr. Anderson replied all of the time. He noted if they had a greater surface area it would solve a lot of problems and they could raise their price point but it's tough right.now especially when they have a new competitor a few miles away with quality. turf. Member Dan Peterson asked is there any support from the Park Board for moving this to a one or two priority. Three Park Board members raised their hands. Centennial Lakes - Tom Shirlev - Replace HVAC Units and Replace Park Sound System Mr. Shirley informed the Park Board there were a number of other items that were on last year's five year plan that did not make it through this year's process but are putting much more into their operating budget the next few years rather than the CIP. Member Jones asked if the speakers at the outdoor skating rink work or do they need to be replaced. Mr. Shirley replied those speakers are only used during the winter and a couple of them are getting a little crackly, especially the main ones at the Centrum building. He stated that right now they are all working but they are going to start failing. Unfortunately, when they find out they are not working, it's going to be during the winter and then the problem is getting up the poles to replace them. Member Jones asked if it is possible to separate those speakers from the whole in ground speaker system that is running throughout the park. Mr. Shirley replied yes, they have a number of amplifiers right now and thinks they have approximately a dozen amplifiers that are controlled separately so they can turn those off during the summertime. Member Jones asked about the cost for this project since it is a rated 7 because she is trying to.think about when she is at the park where they experience music. She noted she thinks it would be important to maintain the sound system if it's broken in the Centrum and outdoor speakers. She commented for movie night she doesn't know if these are the same speakers, so if they do need to replace those, she would suggest those be a priority within the next five years. She added she is not sure about the in ground speakers. Mr. Shirley replied they have a program where they are replacing them continuously throughout the year and that a lot of them are pretty old. Member Jones asked what it would cost to replace to which Mr. Shirley replied that it depends on the speaker, how they get to it and the quality, but they are approximately a $1,000 a speaker. Again, the problem is getting up to the speakers because that adds a big cost right there. Edinborough Park — Susan Faus — Replaster Pool, Security Camera System, Pool and Wall Tile, Lift to Birthday Party Area, Track Floor, Concrete Repairs, Adventure Peak Remodel, North Sidewalk, Track Air Conditioning, Adventure Peak Wave Slide, Upstairs Restroom Remodel, Park Boiler, Ramp to Track, Provider Larger Locker Rooms and Window Washing. Member Segreto indicated that for concrete repairs it shows a lump sum of $153,000 and asked if some of the really bad areas that are safety hazards should be given a higher priority. Ms. Faus replied that they got that number from the City and they recommended replacing the entire area and because of the current damage and where it's leaking they recommend replacing it all at one time. Ms. Kattreh added that the $153,000 is to primarily replace the main park entrance concrete including the entrance off of the parking lot. She indicated that actually what Member Segreto is proposing they are doing in that they are taking a look at the most serious and potentially dangerous issues that they've attempted to patch that can no longer just be patched. Member Segreto stated that it's her recollection that Adventure Peak produces quite a bit of revenue from birthday parties and is a very popular destination not only for Edina residents but residents across the Twin Cities. She noted that it concerns her that a number of items related to Adventure Peak are low priorities and it seems to her that all of the Adventure Peak items should be the same priority. She asked if City Council would give a little consideration to increasing their priority if this is a revenue stream for Edinborough. Ms. Faus agreed that Adventure Peak is a primary revenue source for them. Member Kathryn Peterson asked if they would cement over the existing steps to make the ramp in the same spot to which Ms. Faus replied yes. Member Kathryn Peterson commented that the price tag of $41,000 seems really high as well as the pool and wall tile costing almost $190,000 seems like a crazy amount of money to her. She stated that in her own personal experience working on past projects with the City it seems the City gets the worst deal ever of everything and it seems like everything costs twice as much as any of them could go out and find it for. Ms. Kattreh responded that the prices are actually based on architect estimates so that isn't necessarily what they will end up paying because they rely on experts to give them estimates. She explained when it actually comes time to doing the projects they will receive multiple competitive bids for a project like that and would go through a sealed bid process so therefore they would get the best pricing available. Ms. Kattreh pointed out in regards with the ramp to the track they actually don't have enough distance to be able to concrete over those steps or to add any sort of an easy type of a chair access. They will need to build adjacent to those stairs from the windows in the track all the way down the entrance to the concession stand. It would be approximately a 30 foot ramp that would be overhanging in the Great Hall and because of the width of those steps there is just no structural way to do anything within that footprint. She added that amount is in the architects estimate. Member Dan Peterson asked why not just make the steps a ramp to which Ms. Kattreh replied because of the code requirements the ramp would not even fit if you were to go from the track door to the entrance of the concession stand and there is a restroom access right in between so that eliminates that possibility. Member Jones commented they are building a ramp to the track; however, the track floor has been given a priority 7 and is curious what the track floor looks like and what it needs. Ms. Faus replied they did put that in the initial CIP but it wasn't considered a high priority; however, the condition of the track floor is definitely worn and there are certain areas where it has worn down and could be a potential hazard. Member Jones asked if anything else needs to be done on the track level because it doesn't make logical sense to her if they are going to spend that much money on a ramp to get up there but are not going to improve the surface of the floor so that once you get there it's not safe is inconsistent. Ms. Kattreh pointed out that part of the goal in the renovation of Edinborough is to improve its overall handicap accessibility and that is one area where they are lacking significantly. She thinks that is probably the reason the rating committee ranked that one a little higher. Member Jones asked if you took a wheelchair to the track right now would it be safe to which Ms. Faus replied yes she believes it would be safe. 10 Member Jones asked regarding the POS (point of sale system) that is scheduled for 2017 she remembers last year talking about having the ability to have one POS for all of the enterprises and wondered where that went. Ms. Kattreh responded they are working in that direction and just installed that POS'system at the Aquatic Center and as the POS are in need of replacement they are working towards the same system. Member Jones asked regarding the security system that is scheduled to go in is that a similar system that is used in the other facilities to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes it's the same system used at City Hall, Public Works and the Aquatic Center. Chair Steel stated she�feels strongly about moving up the priority for the lift to the Birthday Party area and noted it's a higher priority than the ramp to the track but the same amount. She -noted that it's hard weighing two different accessibility projects where the ramp to the track is more resident oriented and the lift to the birthday party area serves fewer Edina residents but nonetheless children. She asked Ms. Faus for some insight and felt it should be pushed to 2013. Ms. Faus replied again she was not part of how the projects were prioritized but did note that they currently do have the ability to create another birthday site by putting people into the amphitheater which does have access. Therefore, personally for her the priority would be access to the track. Member Kathryn Peterson commented that she finds the new process to be somewhat frustrating. It appears to her that it went from staff to the City Council and then Park Board gets to look at it but it seems like a lot of the priorities have already been decided which begs the question what is the Park Board's role except to hear presentations and ask questions which she is not sure changes any outcomes. She indicated that she is a little frustrated as to why they are doing this because to her it would make sense to go from staff to the Park Board to the City Council. Member Segreto stated that she feels the same way. Member Deeds commented that if it's going to go from staff to City Council then don't waste the Park Board's time because that is one hour of his life that he won't get back. VII.D. 2013 Proposed Fees and Charges Member Cella asked why the fee went down for photo shoots in the Great Hall and asked if it had to do with fewer trees or something. Ms. Faus replied that was a mistake the fee will remain the same as in 2012. Member Deeds indicated that the golf fees remained the same as in 2012 and noted given the increasing fuel costs and assorted other things means your cost recovery will go down and you are not keeping up with inflation and asked why no movement. Mr. Anderson replied because last year they raised the fee $2.00 for 18 holes and $1.00 for 9 holes in addition to raising the patron card fee by $5.00 and added they had never done those three things in one year. Member Hulbert asked wasn't it also part of the study to have an every other year review of the rates and try to keep them consistent for a couple of years and not jack them up year after year to which Mr. Anderson replied that is correct. Member Jacobson asked Ms. Kattreh where they stand regarding the. folks who live at Edinborough and the contract they have that is expiring. She asked did they make an agreement to renew or are they willing to pay fees for using the facility. Ms. Kattreh replied they have not heard a final answer from any of their neighbors but are still trying to get a contract signed. VILE. Sports Dome Location Recommendation Member Jacobson gave the Park Board a recap of where the Sports Dome Committee netted out their main recommendation. The Committee felt that doming the soccer field at the Braemar Facility was not enough so they recommended to add on the improvements of Pamela Park fields as kind of a bundled version and believes it did go to City Council. Ms. Kattreh replied -that City Council is looking for a recommendation from Park Board tonight. 11 Member Jacobson explained that one of the main things that the Edina Soccer Club (ESC) is concerned with is if they put a dome over the soccer field at Braemar they Are reducing the size of that field; therefore, if it's smaller it's less useable which means that -they have really gone down on the number of fields that are of a high quality that can be used for ESC. She noted that is why the recommendation is to add additional field capacity or add on or. improve the Pamela Park soccer field in width so that it is a useable field for play. Member Kathryn Peterson commented that she knows one of the things that has come up is possibly stopping the current practice of resting one of the fields at Lewis Park and asked if that could also be bundled'in terms of an approach to satisfy the concerns that ESC has. Ms. Kattreh replied she did have that discussion with ESC and they feel with the additional field at Lewis Park it would be most beneficial'in the fall. They do not feel this woul&be enough of an addition to take the place of what they could potentially be losing at Braemar if they were to lose the width of that field. However; she.thinks it is something they should take a.hard look at with their maintenance crew and with the recommendation from the Park .Board as well it would be helpful to review the use of the Lewis Park fields. Member Kathryn Peterson asked would the new field at Pamela meet the requirements in terms, of the field size that is being.lost. Ms. Kattreh replied they wouldbe very close, the width of the renovated field at Pamela would. be 230 feet and the width of Braemar right now is 240 feet. She pointed out they would also be proposing to add an upgraded field at Pamela because right now that field space,is being used as practice space. She explained if they were to upgrade to a sand peat type of a field surface it would definitely be an improved game and practice venue and that is where they would really be getting the net gain in the field with the addition of the renovation of that field and they would also,be improving the width of the existing senior field. Member Jones asked,to be brought up to speed and asked if there is an approach the'.City could take to meet the demands that would satisfy them. Ms. Kattreh explained that prior to the;Financial Committee's review of the CIP this year the renovation.of the fields at Pamela Park would- accomplish „ this goal. As the review team took a first look at;the CIP and the funding sources available they felt the Addition and renovation of the field was not a priority so those fields were moved back and thatis'where this glitch came into the process. She commented that was the reason in the delay, of the last sports dome meeting because she was -looking.for the results of the initial CIP review to try to.alleviate the field problem involving the dome at Braemar. Chair Steel commented it is her understanding that tonight they are just recommending the location instead of worrying about the funding. Ms. Kattreh replied they would recommend asking the City Council to take the'next step in hiring a consultant to then look at the Braemar site and determine the feasibility, the cost and the size of the field that they would be able to put there as well as the dollar numbers needed to move forward. Member Jacobson informed the Park Board at the end of their last meeting a suggestion talked about off the table was that one of the.stipulations that City Council had was that they can't look at any school properties. However, it seemed to them like one of the most economical ways to do.this project and leave Braemar alone. If the City were able to partner with the School District and look at putting a dome on Kuhlman it would be much cheaper and they would leave their best field alone. Member Hulbert asked didn't they try that once to which Member Jacobson replied yes. Member Deeds stated that the current proposal is that the domed Braemar field gets them a dome and they can say they have a dome and other than that it does not seem to him to be a substantial benefit and use of public money. He stated that actually it would probably be a net loss in terms of play time if they simply dome Braemar. He indicated that Kuhlman is the best solution and the idea of doming the large soccer field at Braemar is convenient, it's easy, it will not be cheap and they will lose field space for it. He commented that he doesn't see it as beneficial, he has been on the committee and he has gone through this and at the end of the day it doesn't solve the problem and it will end up costing 1.5 million 12 to.3 million dollars to do it and he doesn't support it. He added that if the ESC is not going to support it and is not going to step up and commit to the hours on it, it doesn't dome anywhere close to penciling out. He pointed out that notonly is it an expensive capital improvement but it's a net loss every year in terms of operating costs because they will have a dome up and taking it down and they don't have a commitment on the largest tenant to fill it. He commented that as it stands he doesn't think the project should move forward until some level of understanding is reached. It just doesn't make sense to spend money for consultants right now on Braemar or move this project forward until something gets worked out. Mr. Deeds indicated that they were told by .City Council that they cannot consider neighborhoods or school property which meant they had the field at Braemar; they looked at a bunch of other sites that they knew were never going to work but at the end of the day Braemar is a lousy choice; it doesn't solve the problem; all it does is allow Edina to say we have a dome. To him it is a lousy use of public money. Member Kathryn Peterson indicated the ESC response says with some minor tweaks they are ,ready to support this and commit to the hours we've discussed. She stated to her minor tweaks, doesn't sound like a different location necessarily and therefore thinks the door might.be open to having another field, such as Pamela, that might be a replacement for that. She noted that at the same time she would agree that Kuhlman would be the more logical alternative and asked if there was a way to move forward and say "continue to look at both sites and do some cost comparisons" because she thinks it will show up that there are some significant cost savings about one location versus the other. Member Almog asked why Kuhlman Field was ruled out in the first place. Member Kathryn Peterson replied because at one point in the past there was an active neighborhood group that fought against it, that was quite some years ago and people change but in some people's memory it is still quite vivid. She stated she doesn't know if that group still exists and doesn't know if people have the same passion. Member Cella commented that it was part of a proposal a number of years to dome Kuhlman and there was a very active neighborhood group of people who surround if that didn't want it in their neighborhood. Member Cella pointed out that another problem with Kuhlman would be parking because they are already at the very line of how many parking spaces they need and that may be an issue. She stated she also has concerns moving forward with Braemar without specifying a size, since size seems to be a huge issue and the original recommendation of the consultant was saying it could only fit 200 feet and we are attaching a picture that says 230 feet and the ESC wants 240 feet. Therefore, if they are just throwing that proposal out without making a recommendation on size or even knowing if the architect could get more than 200 feet seems to be a waste of a recommendation. Member Almog asked what is wrong with Braemar. Member Deeds replied the problem isn't necessarily Braemar because it is a nice field and location; however; the size of the field can be split in half and they can play 8 and 8 so two games can be played at the same time. He pointed out that. if they shrink the field to fit the dome they lose that capacity. Member Deed informed the Park Board they are two to three fields short and if they have to shrink a current field so it can be domed it will actually leave them with a net loss in terms of overall playing time. It doesn't solve the overall problem they are facing which is they don't have enough full- size playing fields. Member Jacobson pointed out another thing with doming Braemar field is you can't play on it all summer and so they are down even one more field so unless they do some kind of improvements to Pamela they wouldn't have a place to play all summer. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that for clarification it was not the City Council that decided not to look at school district sites, it was the School District that asked not to use School District sites and they passed the word on through the City Council. Secondly, the Braemar site has not yet been studied so 13 they don't know how large of a dome could fit on that site. Ms. Kattreh reminded the Park Board that when the consultants did the study that was the size field they recommended based on the use they projected in Edina. She indicated if they were to look at the Braemar site they could certainly ask the consultants to consider two things. First, is there enough width if they cut into the hill on the west side by the Hornet's Nest to expand that field to a domed field of 230 or 240 feet? She stressed that it's important to remember that at this point Braemar has not yet been looked at by a consultant. Secondly, they will want the consultant to look at the size of the dome and figure out how much it's going to cost to operate the dome and with the revenues it could generate would it work. Chair Steel noted that her sentiment is more along the lines of Member Deeds that we are not solving an issue and this is a lot of money. Member Hulbert stated that he agrees with Member Deeds as well as the last sentence from the Report/Recommendation that states "Staff will continue to pursue land purchases options and field renovations to improve the quality and quantity of field space in Edina ". Chair Steel indicated that they could recommend that they continue to explore those options and should an opportunity arise then they will act on it. Member Gieseke stated that he would like to revisit Kuhlman Field. Member Jones commented that she is disappointed in the letter they received from ESC because she doesn't think they realize that without the ESA, EBA, EFA and the community are behind this and are willing to work towards solutions and are saying yes they really want this and they are willing to do what it takes. She pointed out that the EBA just said they are willing to work with getting a grant and they are going to spend association money to make this happen because it will make Edina a better place. She noted that she remembers getting all sorts of letters in the beginning of the process of people who really wanted a dome and she is very disappointed after all of staffs time and consultant money that they are left with a letter that is basically not very helpful and feels if they do try to find a way to make this work maybe the ESC will agree with it. She commented she has been working with this group for a while and to be told this at the last minute is quite disappointing. Member Gieseke pointed out that in all fairness to the ESC they have been voicing these kinds of objections during the entire process so when this came to fruition these are the results of their last meeting they objected forcefully and forthrightly. He stated they were honest about it and said this is not the solution they were looking for. Member Jacobson commented she thinks they would like to take the letter back if Park Board was willing to say here is a field you can play on but we haven't provided that option. Member Kathryn Peterson asked is that the minor tweak to which Member Jacobson replied yes. Member Deeds stated that it's the stipulations: Field Dimensions, Pamela Lighted Field and Pamela "Net- New ". Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct, that is what they were intending and that is what was included in their original CIP. Member Jones stated she would prefer that staff take a look at this before they just say we are not going to go any further. Ms. Kattreh replied that she feels very confident that what they have heard from the ESC is if they were able to dome the existing size field then they would not feel like it was a loss of field space; however, then their concern is where they would play during the construction year. They don't feel like there is any field space in Edina and quite frankly they don't want to go outside of Edina for field space so the issue would be the year of construction. Chair Steel commented that earlier they were talking about the driving range at the golf course and that is a very clear project with a very clear return on investment with support and is taking quite a bit of time to fund. She stated with this project there are all of these questions and issues and thinks they need to direct their energy a little more strategically. Member Kathryn Peterson commented that she doesn't read that as being about the dome but reads it as recovering other field space. 14 Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Chair Steel, to discontinue evaluating Braemar as a site for the potential domed sports facility and instead remain open to pursue land purchase options and field renovations to improve the quality and quantity of field space in Edina. Member Kathryn Peterson asked can they make it more inclusive to not eliminate Braemar but to say that we want to look at other things. Member Jones commented that she believes they did look at purchasing property and found that it was cost prohibitive and found that Braemar was an excellent site given the fact that it already has parking and is not going to bother any neighbors. She noted it is already flat or relatively flat and it probably has synergies with the arena and`will hopefully improve the arena facility because of the increased activity. She stated that she thinks it's an excellent site and that there is already a bus from the high school going there. She:knows there are other associations in addition to soccer that are very excited and interested in making this happen for Edina and therefore feels that looking at other sites doesn't make sense to her. Of all of the sites that have been looked at this is the best site. Chair, Steel indicated that she sees Member Kathryn Peterson's point about adding the School District and;would like to add that as a friendly amendment. Chair`Steel made a friendly amendment, in addition to land purchase and field renovation options looking at school district options. Member Segreto stated she would like in her motion to say she does not want staff to spend a lot of time in looking for purchase options, they will be open for purchase options and are trying to increase fields in the City. Member Kathryn Peterson replied she also doesn't want to exclude -the Braemar site; she understands there are shortcomings there but there are limitations here and to say they have to reasonably work within those limitations. She is okay with the possibility of looking,at other sites and she agrees there probably aren't any except for Kuhlman which is only if the City and School District can play nice which seems to be a challenge. She stated that she doesn't want to discard Braemar and based on what the ESC said their acceptance of it can happen there are just other things that have to be packaged with it. Member Deeds pointed out that Braemar works as part of a package, it does not work on its own. The problem he has is if they move this forward in his estimation the City Council is looking so solve this issue by putting up a dome somewhere so it is off of their plate and they can say they have a dome. Therefore, Pamela fields being tied in, etc., are going to get:completely ignored and that is going to make the problem worse and not better and will be spending a significant amount of money on it. It doesn't seem to. him like it is a worthwhile investment of public money simply to have a sports dome that bides three months on one field. Chair Steel stated that she believes the motion was "not to recommend Braemar Soccer field as the site but'for staff to continue to pursue land options and field renovations to improve the quality and quantity of field space in Edina." Chair Steel's, friendly amendment would be to add school district's. as well. Memlier Segreto accepted. Member Gieseke noted that he would like to add specifically Kuhlman field, Member Segreto accepted. Member Jones asked to clarify that the motion states that Braemar is no longer going to be considered. Chair Steel responded it says it does not recommend that Braemar is the site. Member Segreto responded it states "no positive recommendation to direct further interest in that intent ". Member Jones asked Member Segreto if she is saying we reject the committee's ... Member Segreto responded yes, based on some of the rationale that Member Deeds presented. 15 Member Gieseke indicated he would like to make a different motion to recommend the study of Braemar because it's a viable option and at the same time they do not recommend moving forward beyond that point until they can couple that dome site if it does happen with other field renovations and acquiring more fields and specifically Kuhlman. Chair Steel asked Member Segreto if she is comfortable with that, they need to vote or she needs to withdraw the motion. Member Segreto stated that she doesn't want to amend the motion anymore, she feels there is no payback on this dome. Economically she feels as though maybe it's not the right time for Edina to be building the dome and would like to keep her motion the way it is. Member Cella asked are they voting on, which amendments. Chair Steel replied the motion is "to not recommend the sports dome committee's recommendation of the Braemar Soccer field site and for staff to continue to pursue school district, particular Kuhlman field, land purchase options and field renovations to improve the quality and quantity of field space in Edina ". Ayes: Steel, Hulbert, Dan Peterson, Segreto Nays: Jones, Cella, Deeds, Gieseke, Jacobson, Kathryn Peterson Motion Failed Ms. Kattreh indicated if you look at staff's recommendation based on the recommendation from the committee maybe she didn't word it strongly enough based on the recommendation from the Sports Dome Committee. Perhaps there needs to be a little bit stronger language regarding the Pamela fields. Member Kathryn Peterson suggested using words like "requires" or "necessitates" with respect to the funding of the renovation of the fields at Pamela. Member Deeds stated he thinks their recommendation should include that no further study of Braemar be undertaken until study and approval of the field expansion at Pamela Park be approved by the board. Member Kathryn Peterson asked if they could somehow throw Kuhlman in there. Member Jones asked if they could put not only Pamela but other fields in both the School District and city because the school district has many fields that could be upgraded and they have talked about putting a dome over their field and she is thinking about potentially putting in turf at a field. Member Cella asked if she is talking about the School District paying to turf a field because they would love to be able to turf more fields; however, that is not in their budget. Member Deeds replied he thinks what they are talking about is the city and the school district working and playing well together and figuring out a way to improve fields, such as Creek Valley for example, with the City's help so that they are more playable and consider a dome on Kuhlman. Member Cella commented she thinks the Kuhlman dome is going to be a complete non - starter with that neighborhood and with the parking and thinks they are going to be distracting themselves from the issue because that whole neighborhood will get whipped into frenzy and you will lose focus on getting a dome done. Member Deeds commented he thinks if you put up a dome it's not like they are going to be drawing crowds like they do for football and it's not going to overrun the parking lot. Member Gieseke indicated that he doesn't understand the parking issue, no activity is going to take place there that is not taking place there right now and parking is fully functional. Member Cella explained that they have state requirements of how many parking spaces they need given the amount of buildings they have, if you are going to add one more activity they are required to count how many activities are potentially in those buildings. Member Gieseke replied he understands that but they are not adding an activity to which Member Cella replied they would be adding people coming to a covered over dome that is currently not used during the winter. Member Gieseke stated that when they do accommodate a football game and they do accommodate other activities there they have no parking problem and there is no incremental addition. Member Cella responded she's assuming they would be using it approximately from November through March and that she doesn't know exactly how they count parking spaces, she just knows they are on the edge of how many parking spaces they have and it's going to be an issue. 16 Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, that the continued study of Braemar and the forward motion of the dome should not occur until the issue of expanded playing fields is addressed, solved, and budgeted for. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Kathryn Peterson, Jacobson, Hulbert, Segreto, Cella Motion Carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Ms. Kattreh indicated the correspondence and petitions she received were included in the packet regarding Garden Park and the Walnut Ridge Park lighting issues. X. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None XI. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board they are hoping to have the golf dome up and operational in February, or March 2013. The first bid packages are going out for the fabric and for the turf which are due'on October kh. Meeting adjourned at 10:07 pm 17 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION October 23, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:09 PM. IL ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston, and Student Members Mohtadi. Staff present: Scott Neal, City Manager and temporary Staff Liaison; and Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton and seconded by Commissioner Seidman approving the meeting agenda of June 26, 2012. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED IV. A. September 20, 2012 Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore and seconded by Commissioner Finsness to approve the September 20, 2012 minutes with the following revisions submitted by Commissioner Newell prior to the meeting. Ayes: Bigbee; Cashmore, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Under II. ROLLCALL Add Commissioner Finsness and Student Members Maggie Stang and Tara Mohtadi to roll call. Under VI. Reports and Recommendations A. Carrie Cabe, Edina Resource Center Replace "is also in charge of with "also works with." Under VI. Reports and Recommendations A. Carrie Cabe, Edina Resource Center Revise: The Edina Resource Center has received a grant from B1ueCross BlueShield, to go towards community organizing. Cabe may be reframing the grant money to move it towards outreach at the school because they have not gotten many responses when they walk the area or call and talk to apartment managers. To: The Edina Resource Center has received a grant from B1ueCross BlueShield, to go towards community organizing. Cabe will be targeting the grant money to move it towards outreach at the school because this has been the most effective form of outreach. Under VI. Reports and Recommendations A. Carrie Cabe, Edina Resource Center Remove: Under VI. Reports and Recommendations A. Carrie Cabe, Edina Resource Center Revise: Manager Neal said he is not sure how aware of the Unite 273 issue the commission is, but the Council has meet with the School Districts and they did talk briefly about these school district lines. To: Manager Neal said he is not sure how aware of this issue the city is, but the Council has met with the School Districts and they did talk briefly about these school district lines. IV. A. August 28, 2012 Minutes City Manager Intern Klugman explained, Commissioner Erhardt was left out of the August 28, 2012 minutes. Staff submitted a revision to the minutes adding Commissioner Erhardt throughout. Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee and seconded by Commissioner Winnick to approve the August 28, 2012 minutes with the revisions submitted by Staff. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS V1. A. Fartun Weli Commissioner Newell introduced our speaker Fartun Weli, the founder and present director of Isuroon, an initiative created to serve the estimated 1 in 3 Somali -born immigrant women struggling with infertility, a disorder considered a "failure of womanhood" in traditional Somali culture and guest John Ford, Equity and Inclusion Specialist for the Edina School District. Weli provided background information on Somalia. Somalia is a long, narrow country that wraps around the Horn of Africa. It has the longest coast of any African nation, bordering on both the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. Mogadishu is the capital and largest city. Unlike many African nations, Somalia is composed of a single, homogeneous ethnic group. Although Somalis may differ in nuances of local lifestyle, they share a uniform language, religion, and culture, and trace their heritage to a common ancestor. Weli explained the role of respect in Somali culture. The person must have a strong character ( trust worthy, are able to lead, are educated, are wealthy, are able to communicate with everyone, and have knowledge of the Qur'an, tribal and family history. Children and elders share mutual respect. When addressing another family member or friend, words for "aunt," "uncle," "brother," "sister," and "cousin" are used depending on the person's age relative to the speaker. Men are usually the head of the household. Women manage the finances and take care of the children. It is considered culturally unacceptable for a man to not be perceived as being in charge of his home. At the wedding ceremony, the groom is told by the elder /sheik/father /father -in -law that he is responsible for feeding his family and respecting his wife. Weli provided some suggestions on how to engage new American's and create community ownership in the process. The process Weli suggested is called MAPP, which stands for Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships. MAPP emphasizes a community- driven and community–owned approach — because the community's strengths, needs, and desires drive the process, MAPP provides the framework for creating a truly community- driven initiative. This creates stronger connections throughout the community and provides access to the collective wisdom necessary to addressing community concerns. Weli proposed the following process: Phase 1 • Find Somali Edina residences • Identify those who are active and may be leaders • Form Somali committee Phase 2 • Develop questionnaires for quick needs assessment to identify Somali resident needs • Survey questions for Edina residents to find • What they know about Somali community? • What they need to know /concerns Phase 3: • Meeting to share the needs assessments and survey. Phase 4: • Form a coalition between Somali community and leaders. • Share the needs assessment information and the survey • Agree on strategy to address the needs of both groups. Weli then took questions from Commissioners. Commissioner Bigbee asked if there are members of the community that cannot read either English or Somali, and how can they be engaged. Weli responded saying by training and finding community leaders who can meet and read the survey to the members. She pointed out a lot of times this is better than just having a yes or no answer. The committee would have to be formed. Commissioner Stanton asked about finding leaders and whether they would have to live in Edina. Weli stated the point would be to engage new Somali's in Edina. There are other more active communities that can be used as resources to help reach out, but the goal is to transfer the skills to the Edina community. Commissioner Bigbee asked about how we identify and if there are other groups in Edina besides Somalis. John Ford responded there is a large East African population in the Parklawn area. Commissioner Bigbee suggested doing something besides just identifying but something to interact. Weli agreed that interaction is important. The more a community is isolated the more religious the group can become. Sometimes that produces more hostile interactions. Commissioner Winnick pointed out the Hopkins group already exists and asked how different agencies are interacting, for instance the City or School District. Weli explained in Hopkins there is a huge educational gap between the school district and the Somali population. For instance, the group has told the school district we need help with reading, writing and math in kindergarten through seventh grade, but the school wants to focus on preparing high school students for college. Commissioner Cashmore suggested using any involvement we already have in the communities, for instance the Police department. Weli pointed out that at times the police department is not the best to make the first interactions because of the position of authority. Commissioner Finsness asked Student Member Mohtadi about how the interaction works in the school. Student Member Mohtadi stated it is not terrible, but they could do a better job reaching out. She suggested including student members in any potential committee. Carrie Cabe is going to connect with Weli by email to talk about some next steps. VI. B. Plan for November's Annual Televised Meeting Chair Kingston reminded the commission the Chair and Vice Chair elections process will take place in January. Commissioner Winnick will be in charge of the process since he is administrative chair. Since the December meeting of the HRRC is cancelled, any proposed changes or comments will need to be submitted at the November meeting for discussion. Commissioner Seidman asked if the plan to bring in different guests for the November meeting had been finalized. Chair Kingston stated the issue was unresolved and was moved to be decided upon tonight. Chair Kingston asked Commissioner Newell to remind the group of her proposed guest. Commissioner Newell explained, she wanted to set aside a period of time for Karmit Bulman from the Conflict Resolution Center (CRC) to come in as a guest and speak about their services. Commissioner Seidman asked Commissioner Newell to explain what the CRC does and how it relates to the goals and objectives of the HRRC. Commissioner Newell explained they offer mediation for stuff like dog bites, family custody issues and have trained mediators available for groups. City Manager Neal explained the City uses them to handle issues through police or neighborhood disputes. Commissioner Finsness explained they could offer an explanation of services for the City and suggested making the annual televised meeting informative. For instance, last year we had the census person come in and explain their relation to the Commission. Commissioner Stanton asked why the group would be coming to speak to the HRRC; there is a Human Services Taskforce that now makes the decisions related to which service groups to fund. Commissioner Bigbee suggested focusing the meeting on the issues, how can the HRRC make a difference and link with other City objectives. For instance the new Economic Development initiative, there will be Human impacts on proposed projects. Commissioner Winnick asked for a decision on the CRC speaking at the November meeting and suggested Karmit be prepared to focus the presentation on Human Rights, if she speaks. Commissioner Cashmore suggested focusing the meeting on encouraging public comment. This could be done by putting the meeting on PIE, City Hall's front sign, etc. 'Commissioner Newell stated Karmit would only need 15 to 20 minutes. Chair Kingston asked the Commission if they wanted to focus on organizations providing services or how the HRRC gets into the community. Commissioner Seidman suggested using the meeting to highlight what they have done over the past year, and what they are .working on. Commissioner Stanton made and Commissioner Winnick seconded a motion to limit mediation to 10 minutes with 10 minutes for discussion. Commissioner Seidman asked to amend the motion for the presentation to follow the HRRC year in review. Commissioner Finsness stated the Commission should be more respectful of the'CRC's time. Commissioner Cashmore suggested a power point presentation to add texture to the presentation. The Commission voted on the original motion. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Abstain: Cashmore Motion carried. The Commission then discussed what to include in their PowerPoint. The following events were suggested: resolutions, events, sponsorship, religious observance policy. City Manager Intern Klugman will put together the PowerPoint with Chair Kingston. Commissioner Cashmore suggested publicizing the annual meeting. VI.A. Voter ID Guest Editorial Commissioner Winnick moved to submit the Voter ID editorial to the Sun Current. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. V1. B. General Work Plan Updates I: Monitor Domestic Partner Ordinance This item will'be continued at the Commission's joint meeting with. the Council. IL Initiate Census Research Funding Recommendation. Commission Stanton stated there are no further updates, we will'stay close for opportunities with the Somali Community. Commissioner Winnick shared he plans to share the Work Plan with the Community Council to help promote. 111. Anti - Bullying Event and Education Commissioner Finsness and Commissioner Bigbee met with Dick Crocket and Emilie Kastner about an April feature on Edina Reads. The Commissioners would also like Student Members Mohtadi and Stang to help them with the event. Chair Kingston mentioned the books for the event could possibly be bought out of this year's budget. Commissioner Newell suggested leaving the books after they were read in a public location to be shared. Commissioner Cashmore moved to buy as many book as possible with this years budget. Commissioner Bigbee seconded the motion. The Commission would like to put some logo or endorsement on the books from the Author or City to distinguish them. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. IV. Marriage Amendment Editorial Commissioner Stanton shared the Sun Current ran their own feature. The item can be removed after the election results can be shared at our next meeting. V. Tom Oye Award Commissioner Winnick shared the About Town article information with the Commission and asked the Commission to think of ways to reach out to potential nominees or nominators. The information has been sent to the school district to include in their newsletters. The deadline for the process is going to be moved to January 15d' to allow time for the Commission to look at submissions in January. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS There was no correspondence or petitions. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Cashmore shared he had spoken with Council Member Brindle about a Human Trafficking meeting that was held in Edina. He suggested possibly looking at this issue in 2013. Commissioner Newell shared the YWCA had an event called It's time to talk dialogue on race. At the event she met Roxanne Giben's the chair of the African American Museum of Minnesota. Giben's told her about an African American family who was among the founders of Edina, called the Yancey's. The information came from a book by Debrah Morris -Kahn on the History of Edina. Perhaps in 2013 the Commission could do something to create or fundraise for an exhibit at the History Museum. Commissioner Stanton shared Marilynn Carlson spoke at the Carlson School on the Marriage Amendment and made a very good business case for voting no. Commissioner Finsness shared this year marks the 10's anniversary of Senator Wellstone's death. Finsness also mentioned at the MEA Conference Senator Klobuchar spoke against both amendments and against Citizen's United. Commissioner Bigbee shared information about a non - profit theatre called morphology Pangea World Theatre, who is doing a piece on forced prostitution. Bigbee also shared 2013 is the 125`h anniversary of Edina and they are working to get groups together to help celebrate. Commissioner Bigbee and Student Member Mohtadi are going to work to come up with something the HRRC can do. Commissioner Winnick asked about the SE corner where the school district is different and what the city can do to create an ordinance to notify apartment owners notify about the school district. Manager Neal said they can do some consumer protection but at most it is a misdemeanor and enforcement is light. Neal shared the Council is to discuss rental housing on November 20. Commissioner Winnick and Newell are going to go to the worksession to discuss and give input about rental housing. Chair Kingston reminded the group to start thinking about Chair and Vice Chair positions. The election will be in February. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Manager Neal shared November 5'h the Human Services Taskforce will present their recommendation to Council. On November 1P the Mayor has invited the HRRC to Diwali at 7pm at the Temple. Manager Neal also announced starting in January the HRRC meetings will be recorded. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Commissioner Bigbee moved and Commissioner Winnick seconded adjournment of the meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 9:33 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, November 27, 2012 Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern Jessi Kingston, HRRC Chair MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 14, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Grabiel called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Forrest, Schroeder, Kilberg, Platteter, Carpenter, Staunton Fischer and Grabiel. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was filed as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Staunton moved approval of the October 10 & 24th meeting minutes. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. Chair Grabiel asked Commissioner Platteter, one of the'three Commission members of a sub working group discussing topic such as subdivisions of smaller lots, grading and retaining walls etc. to give a brief update on their progress. Commissioner Platteter reported that the subgroup has met a couple times with the goal of future meetings to include meetings with City Staff, fielding a "working group" to gather specific information on a number of topics. Platteter said that all information gathered would be brought back to the Commission for further discussion. He concluded that so far the subgroup has received a number of comments from residents through different avenues. A. Lot Division. 7309 -7311 Glouchester Drive, Edina, MN Page 1 of 9 Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Robert and Yvonne Leslie are proposing to split their existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separation of the existing double - dwelling at 7309 & 7311 Glouchester Drive. There is an existing shed in the rear yard that would be relocated to the northern lot, so not be located over the proposed lot line. Teague explained that the east and south side of Glouchester Drive, where the subject property is located, is made up of duplexes and are all Zoned R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. Several of the duplexes in this neighborhood were divided in a similar manner, including the adjacent properties to the north and south. Teague reported that the duplexes in this area were constructed with a fire -rated wall separating the two units. The property owner has verified that this structure was similarly constructed. Documentation verifying that a fire -rated wall separates the two units shall be condition of any approval for this request. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the lot division as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The two units must be separated by a fire -wall as approved by the building official. 2. The existing shed shall be relocated"to the north lot. 3. The approving resolution will not be filed until both of these items have been completed. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none; Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Fischer said that this request is similar to others routinely approved and moved to recommend approval of the lot division request for 7309- 7311 Glouchester Drive, Edina, MN. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Site Plan. Bruce Carlson. 7510 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported Bruce Carlson, on behalf of the Centennial Lakes Plaza, is requesting a Site Plan review to build a 1,750 square foot Starbucks Coffee shop with a Page 2of9 drive - through window and an outdoor seating area, within the parking lot of Centennial Lakes Plaza at 7501 France Avenue. The project complies with all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. The Planning Commission previously reviewed this plan. at the August 22, 2012 Planning Commission meeting. As a result of the discussion and concern over the location of the drive - through stacking lane, the applicant has revised the plan by relocating the building so it is parallel to France Avenue, which allows for longer and more clear stacking lane that would not interfere with on -site circulation, The proposed Starbucks would experience its most activity during the morning hours, when the shopping center is not at its busiest time. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan for Starbucks located at 7501 `France Avenue. Approval is based.on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan. 2. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. 3. The revised lane for the drive - through window would provide adequate stacking space, and would not; interfere with traffic on France Avenue. Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the .conditions below: •. Site plan'date stamped October 18, 2012. •: = Grading °plan date stamped ,October 18,.2012. 'Landscaping plan date stamped October 18, 2012. o Building elevations date stamped October 22, 2012 •. Building.materials board as presented at the. Planning Commission and'City Council, meeting. 2. Prior the issuance. of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must,be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing °the required landscaping, screening, or.erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required. landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions. required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 8, 2012. Page 3 of 9 Appearing for the Applicant t Bruce Carlson, Project Director Mid - America Real Estate Applicant Presentation Mr. Carlson addressed the Commission and explained after their last meeting with the Commission he took back the Commissions suggestions to the development team and tenants of Centennial Lakes. Carlson asked the Commissioners to recall that originally the building was not parallel to France Avenue, adding the revised plan now orients the building parallel to France, adding all parties agreed with the revised orientation. With the aid of graphics Carlson displayed aerial photos of the site focusing on the area where the proposed coffee shop would be located. Carlson asked the Commission to note the activity on the site; pointing out the proposed location for the coffee shop is relatively deserted, especially during peak morning hours. Carlson noted the photos were taken in April and October 2012. Concluding, Carlson said he does have difficulty with Engineer Houle's suggestion to upgrade the sidewalk to reflect the new 8 -foot wide sidewalk standard in the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvements study. He pointed out the 5 -foot wide sidewalk is a new sidewalk and asked that this "condition" be lifted. Planner Teague interjected that staff is willing to rescind that condition if the Planning Commission felt it was appropriate. Discussion Commissioner Staunton noted the revisions to the plan and questioned how a pedestrian walking on the sidewalk along France Avenue would access the coffee shop. Carlson responded there will be a pedestrian crosswalk to access the shop. Staunton said he believes the access is awkward and asked if they.ever considered reversing the flow. Carlson explained because of the location of the driver the circulation can't be reversed. Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Carlson if a Stop sign would be added. Carlson responded in the affirmative. A discussion ensued on the internal circulation on the site and the sidewalk. Planner Teague explained that the current sidewalk along France Avenue is the sidewalk staff asked the applicant to build as a condition of approval for Whole Foods. Teague reiterated staff is agreeable to striking that condition from the engineering Memo. Commissioner Fischer commented when Whole Foods was approved it wasn't common procedure for the Commission to condition site plan approval on sidewalk construction; adding this condition was suggested to aid in the City's goal of connectivity and the Page 4 of 9 applicant agreed. Fischer pointed out along this span of France Avenue there were no sidewalks; now there is. This was a start of connectivity. Commissioner Schroeder commented that the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvement study has indicated that sidewalks along France be 8 -feet wide; not 5-feet as was constructed. Mr. Carlson said to clarify; he put in the sidewalk he was told to do, adding he just found out about the 8 -foot requirement from the engineering memo. Chair Grabiel asked if there was anyone in the audience that would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Carpenter said in his opinion he likes what's been done. He said he likes the reorientation of the building and the spacing for stacking. At this time Carpenter said the only issue he sees is the sidewalk. Commissioner Schroeder acknowledged the sidewalk along this span of France Avenue is new and built at the City's request; however the goal of the pedestrian committee is to achieve 8 -foot sidewalks along France Avenue. 'He said the Commission could suggest in 10 -years if there are more sidewalks along France Avenue at 8 -feet that the sidewalk along this span be reconstructed to 8 -feet. Commissioner Staunton acknowledged that this request is for site plan review which is a minimal review; however, in reviewing the Comprehensive Plan and the guidelines in the Land Use section that he struggles with the building layout and circulation. Staunton pointed out having a drive aisle between a building and sidewalk doesn't appear to conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Forrest said she wasn't too troubled by the location, orientation of the building or traffic circulation, adding it should be remembered that this coffee shop is being located in a parking lot of a shopping center, it's not vacant land. Continuing, Forrest said she is fairly comfortable with this plan, adding she likes the windows on the west elevation, it's a good compromise from what the Commission last viewed. Forrest commented that with regard to the sidewalk 5 -feet vs. 8 -feet she has no strong feelings either way. Forrest said she's happy there's now a sidewalk, adding her concern is with maintenance of the sidewalk in both the warm and cold months. She concluded she wants this sidewalk to be carefully maintained year round. Commissioner Platteter said he agrees with the comments from Commissioner Forrest; however is concerned with the west elevation. Platteter said in his opinion the west building elevation needs to be "broken" up to reduce its mass. He added to him it's very important to better address France Avenue. Commissioner Schroeder noted one thing to keep in mind is parking and the Page 5 of 9 ti incremental impact these "small" redevelopments could have on parking. Schroeder said the 1988 plan should be revisited to ensure that overtime the City is more deliberate and cognizant when reviewing further redevelopment plans for this area. Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion the layout is good; however, agrees that the west elevation could be softened. Fischer said he isn't a big fan of drive - through facilities; however the placement of this drive - through window is correct. Concluding, Fischer said in his opinion the plan is reasonable. Chair Grabiel acknowledged the importance of continuing'to achieve the goals of the City in providing pedestrian connectivity, adding he doesn't have a problem with City staff striking the 8 -foot wide sidewalk requirement, especially since the 5 -foot wide sidewalk is new and at the request of the City. A discussion ensued about the west elevation and if that elevation should be enhanced. The applicant and architect said in their opinion the proportions on the west elevation are appropriate. It was pointed out the fagade is active; there is a drive - through window on the west elevation along with the windows in the "dining" area. At night this elevation would appear very active. It was also noted that landscaping should soften this elevation. Commissioner Schroeder commented that he hasn't seen a photo metric study of lighting and questioned if there is any impact from lighting. Ms. Anderson, architect for the project said there is no removal of lighting, adding nothing should really change. Commissioner Forrest noted relocation of light poles to frame the building. Motion Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend Site Plan Approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions, adding a condition to the city engineers recommendation that the required sidewalk improvements per the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvements (an 8 -foot wide sidewalk) shall be completed on the site within 10 years of the site plan approval or when the France Avenue sidewalks on the adjacent properties to the north and south are installed. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Schroeder, Carpenter, Fischer and Grabiel. Nays; Staunton and Platteter. C. Rezoning. Erik's Ranch. 3420 Heritage Drive, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Erik's Ranch and Retreats is requesting a rezoning of 3420 Heritage Drive from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the purpose of allowing adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) within the existing building. There are no exterior changes proposed to Page 6of9 the site or building. The request is simply to allow adults with ASD to live within this building. The interior of the building would be remodeled. The existing building contains 59 units; 35 of those units would be used for long -term residents with ASD. The remaining 24 units would short term stays. Roger Knutson, the city attorney, has advised staff that the City could face liability for rejecting a rental application from an individual with a disability who does not meet the minimum age requirement for City housing. The attorney has recommended two options. One, rezone the site to PUD to allow the current use plus adults with ASD or two, amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow adults with disabilities or ASD within all PSR - 4 Zoning District. Staff and the applicant are recommending a rezoning to PUD, rather than opening up the use City wide within all PSR -4 Districts. Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve Preliminary & Final Rezoning from PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish the PUD Zoning District to allow adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) at 3420 Heritage Drive. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. There would be no exterior changes the existing site or building. 3. Each unit within the existing building would be remodeled to accommodate the new residents. 4. The traffic analysis of the proposed use done by traffic consultant, WSB & Associates concludes that there would be no impact to the adjacent roadway system. The number of residents and number of employees would not change with the additional land use. 5. The proposal meets the following goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types. b. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. c. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. Appearing for the Applicant Kathryn Nordberg Discussion Commissioner Staunton questioned what's driving this zoning change. Planner Teague responded that the building owner desires to include adults with Autism Spectrum Page 7 of 9 Disorders to live within the existing building. Teague noted that 3420 Heritage Drive is zoned PSR -4 which is a seniors only zoning designation. Commissioner Forrest said she has a concern with the autism only restriction. She questioned if it should be "open" to all disabilities or at least make it broader than Autism Spectrum Disorders. Teague responded in discussions with the City Attorney it was felt that limiting the disability criteria would afford the City more protections and flexibility. Chair Grabiel referred to the applicant narrative noting it appears the applicant has designed a program to meet the needs of a specific group of adults with autism. Commissioners agreed. A discussion ensued with Commissioners struggling with the clause that limits disability citing legal concerns. Commissioners noted there are adults with multiple disabilities questioning if the City (Zoning) could be challenged on this restriction. Continuing Commissioners acknowledged the complexity of the option of changing the zoning code to permit adults with disabilities from residing in the PSR zoning districts and recommended placing this consideration on the "bucket list" for future consideration. Applicant Presentation Ms. Nordberg addressed the Commission informing them one in 88 births are autistic. Nordberg explained this program was developed to provide living, working and social opportunities for young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). She added the proposed program will interface well with the existing senior population. Public Comment Carol Bell, 6321 Barrie Road commented that while she has no objections to the proposed change in population she wants assurances that all issues were considered and that the continued safety of all Edina residents isn't jeopardized. Ms. Nordberg said she understands the concern expressed by Ms. Bell and added that all applicants would be carefully screened by licensed staff and the population would consist of mild to high functioning adults with no history of violence. Nordberg said that safety for all is of the utmost importance. Concluding, Nordberg said the program would be highly structured, reiterating new residents would be carefully screened and behavioral therapists would be on staff. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone else would like to speak to this issue; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Page 8of9 Commissioner Carpenter asked Ms. Nordberg what goes into the screening process. Ms. Nordberg responded that all records of the potential residents are reviewed by licensed staff. These records include all their school records, medical records and psych /behavioral records. Carpenter asked what would "deem" someone unacceptable. Nordberg responded an individual with violent tendencies and verbal abuse. Commissioner Forrest said her first impression was that it was too restrictive with regard to disabilities; however, after further consideration she believes if the City is very clear this course would work. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved rezoning approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including adopting the proposed ordinance as written. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Grabiel acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Staunton suggested that the Commission revisit their work plan. Staunton said the Commission should compare the Comprehensive Plan with the work plan. Commissioners agreed. Chair Grabiel said in discussions with Planner Teague it was decided that the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on December 26th be cancelled noting the Holiday. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague said he had no further comments. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Forrest moved meeting adjournment at 8:45 PM. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. lTac�ie �oo��rr��e� Respectfully submitted Page 9 of 9 r. MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS OCTOBER 25, 2012 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Director Houle called the meeting to order in the absence of the chair and vice - chair. He explained that the bylaws require the commission to nominate an acting -chair under this circumstance. Member Janovy was nominated as acting -chair by member Franzen and the nomination was seconded by member Surya. No other nominations were made and the nomination closed. All Voted aye. Motion carried. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Schweiger, Sierks and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member LaForce to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF SEPT. 20, 2012 The following corrections were made: Page 2, Traffic Safety Committee, 3`d paragraph, delete '30 mph' and replace with '25 mph;' delete 'pick the speeds that 85% of drivers are traveling' and replace with 'the 85rn percentile speed is the speed at which 85% of drivers are traveling at or under,' and page 3, delete 'None' and add 'Receive minutes of Aug. 14, 2012.' Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member 1yer to approve the amended minutes of Sept. 20, 2012. All voted aye: Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS do.town Update Mr. Flynn Rico - Johnson explained the do -town initiative is a partnership with -the cities of Bloomington, Edina and. Richfield and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota which'aims to address unhealthy and inactive lifestyles and` make residents healthier. They are doing this by conducting walking audits. Residents volunteer to walk certain streets and evaluate the infrastructure to see what is wrong with it. He. said-the point is not to avoid certain streets but to identify what can,be done -to make improvements; e.g. no sidewalk, no streetlights; etc. The audits are for people of all ages and focus on places most often traveled such as schools, parks, major shopping districts, etc. =He said Edina is a vibrant city and they are looking for ideas and help with getting the information out so that they can do more audits and help the City address the concerns when projects are done. Member Janovy said the City Council and the ETC received letters from residents that have done the walking audit. She asked if the audit is better done person by person or in a group. Mr. Rico - Johnson said the 50th /Halifax Ave area audit included different families and this brings different perspectives because each family may have different reasons for walking and because of this, they prefer to have as many 'Y people involved. He said they would like to do walking audits during the winter too and volunteers can contact him at flynn @do- town.ore or info @do.town.ore. Member Janovy asked if they are doing similar audits for biking and he said it is more difficult to do but they are working on it. He said the biking audit can be done by an individual riding his /her favorite route and evaluating it. Hennepin County Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan Ms. Rose Ryan, pedestrian and bicycle planner with Hennepin County said they are working on their first ever county -wide pedestrian plan funded by a five year grant from the Centers of Disease Control called Communities Transformation Grant. She said the purpose is to prevent chronic disease and since walking is an easy physical activity with great benefits, they are using pedestrian/ bicycle planning to set up a framework for a healthy community design. To accomplish their goals of increasing the rates of walking, safety of walking and improved health of county resident, Ms. Ryan said they will be identifying sidewalk gaps, difficult crossings, prioritize improvements to the pedestrians system and coordinate with other agencies /organizations to reach their goals. Ms. Ryan said planning began this past summer with 10 workshops in various communities and the final plan will be submitted to the County Board next summer. She asked for feedback and said the draft plan would be available for review. Mr. Houle noted that the map of existing sidewalks in Edina that Ms. Ryan was working from was inaccurate as it reflected proposed sidewalks and not actual sidewalks. Some areas suggested were missing gaps on France Avenue, Xerxes Avenue, Vernon Avenue by Schaefer Road and View Lane, W. 66th from France to York, and York Avenue. Xerxes Avenue Restripine — from 60th Street West to TH62 Director Houle said this was initiated by a resident through the TSC. The issues were congestion and lanes that are not clearly marked by TH62. This was referred to Hennepin County and they drafted a restriping plan. Area residents and city of Minneapolis are supportive of the plan and staff would like feedback from the ETC. Two suggestions were made that Director Houle will take back to Hennepin County. They were to taper the line where parking ends to make it clear; and add no parking sign where the full width of parking ends because drivers tend to park over the white line where tapering ends. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Policy Member Janovy said Manager Neal is seeking feedback from the ETC on his draft Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Policy. The franchise fee would come from Edina customers of Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy to be used for non - motorized transportation. After discussion, which included the reasons for implementing the franchise fee and the lack of funding for sidewalks, the ETC discussed the following options: 1. Use funds for construction only, not for staffing; 2. Change the name from Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund to Active Living Infrastructure Fund to emphasize active living; 2 3. Identify a certain percentage that will be used for construction vs staffing; 4. Chair Nelson's suggestions which is attached; 5. Clarity on the meaning of 'maintenance' and consider changing it; 2013 Work Plan Member LaForce likes the revised plan. Member Janovy suggested changing Living Streets Policy: Implementation to Living Streets Policy and Implementation Plan; Director Houle will check to see if Safe Routes to School Comprehensive Plan is the correct name;" and change. Ordinance Review for Policy to Review Ordinances for Conformance to Policy. Member Janovy asked if the $150,000 would be in the budget for the Living Streets Policy and Director Houle said he did not know. Motion was made by member lyer and seconded by member LaForce for members Thompson and lyer to write-an advisory communication to the City Council to consider putting $150,000 in the budget to fund Living Streets Policy development. Member Franzen suggested laying out exactly how the $150,000 would be spent. Member LaForce concurred and said he is not sure what the amount is or should be. Director Houle said the amount was identified by the consultant and that he could contact him for a breakdown. All voted aye. Motion carried. 2013 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Director Houle presented the four 2013 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects with the primary focus being on transportation - related reconstruction and not utility. He said a second survey was sent to residents to see if they would like sidewalks and streetlights now that they are to be funded by the franchise fees and majority of respondents said no. A special public hearing meeting is scheduled for Dec. 11 for the City Council to consider approvals. Director Houle said the feasibility studies were also distributed to fire, police, public works, parks and recreation, the school district, and BETF for feedback, but to date, have not received any feedback. Member Janovy suggested identifying for each group how the feasibility study relates to them, e.g. identify the walking zone for the school district. Director Houle said all of the streets in all four neighborhoods are in similar condition - - constructed in the 1960's and'have alligator cracks, exposed base course and utility issues. Mendelssohn A Proposed improvements are new bulkhead curb and gutter, except for Spruce Road which is 14 ft. wide and will get rainbow curbs instead, and new pavement. The proposed assessment is $16,150. Member Janovy said she submitted feedback to staff on the feasibility studies. She asked if Director Houle had considered splitting this neighborhood in two and he said he hadn't but will take a look at it. Normandale Proposed improvements are spot repair to curb and gutter, new pavement, and a sidewalk on W. 66th Street. Proposed assessment is $16,100, including private sanitary sewer upgrades; and $12,300 for a few residents whose sanitary sewer is not in the street and therefore not required to upgrade. 3 Member Janovy said the BETF said West Shore Drive is a primary bike route and recommended separated bike lanes or road markings and signage. Member lyer concurred and recommended dedicated bike lanes. He said parking should not be an issue because there is a parking lot nearby. Member Janovy suggested an off -road trail for consideration. Director Houle said he will schedule an informational meeting with residents to share the suggestions and gather feedback. Braemar Hills B, St. Patrick's Lane, Gleason Circle These three neighborhoods will be presented in one feasibility study but they will be approved separately by City Council. Proposed improvements are spot repair to curb and gutter and new pavement. Proposed assessments are: Braemar Hills B: $9,325, St. Patrick's Lane: $11,300, and Gleason Circle: $11,600. Lake Edina Proposed improvements are spot repair to curb and gutter and new pavement, plus narrowing the curb line at Hibiscus Avenue & West Shore Drive to reduce storm water run -off. Proposed assessment is $11,900. Member Janovy recommended a sidewalk on Normandale Road to Hibiscus Avenue to Kellogg Avenue because of speed and volume and to connect with the Nine Mile trail that is coming soon. Director Houle said he will schedule an informational meeting with residents to share the suggestion and gather feedback. Traffic Safety Committee Report of Oct. 3. 2012 There were no action items in this report. Director Houle will follow up on the counts that were done in member Whited's neighborhood and on W. 44th Street. Updates Student Members Member Schwieger noted that 'fascism' was still painted on,the stop sign. Director Houle will follow up on this. Bike Edina Task Force — Sept. 13, 2012 Minutes A new member was added to the BEFT. Living Streets Working Group No update. Transportation Options Working Group Received minutes of Sept. 18, 2012. Member Whited reported that John Dillery and Jill Hentges from Metro Transit attended the Sept. 18 meeting and talked about Metro Transit's transportation options in Edina. Member Janovy said the time limit is up for this working group and asked if the ETC would like it to continue for another year. Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member La Force for the working group to continue for another year. Member Whited said they need new members. Director Houle will work with 4 communications director Bennerotte to do a press release for new members. Member lyer suggested notifying residents who have applied for boards and commissions position's. All voted aye. Motion carried. Communications Committee Member LaForce said they met with communications director Bennerotte and they now have a good sense of how the committee will work with her. First, the committee will not produce communications or set budget, but instead will.provide ideas, tactics, strategies, etc. Secondly, they will provide feedback on the educational material for the Wooddale bike lanes that staff is working on. And lastly, they are planning to have online forums instead of regular meetings which are new for them so they will evaluate its effectiveness and maybe other groups could do the same. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Received correspondences from City Council packet relating to transportation issues CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member.lanovy said she received a traffic safety request concerning the traffic on South View Lane that she forwarded to Director Houle. Director Houle said the request for flashing lights has been forwarded to the TSC. He said the area will not meet warrants for flashing lights and suggested reviewing the Crosswalk Policy when they create the Pedestrian Plan. In the meantime, they will be rotating the in -road pedestrian signs to this area and they should be there this week (there are 10 -12 that are rotated throughout the city). Member lyer said he's noticed some errors on the bicycle facility map that he will forward to, Director Houle. Regarding the bike lanes on Wooddale Avenue, Member La Force said he is hopeful that they will be able to figure out a way to help residents but he said they should be thinking about ways to reach those who are coming to the city for the first time. STAFF COMMENTS The biking on sidewalks ordinance will be on the Nov. 20 City Council meeting. The Southwest Transit Environment Impact Statement is available for review in Community Development - Planning in City Hall. Continue to observe the Wooddale Avenue advisory bike lanes and the number of signage may be reduced. Staff is considering installing yellow tabs as a temporary measure to delineate the center line. Director Houle said City of Minneapolis did the same striping on 14th Street and it did not generate the kind of responses that Edina's is getting; he also said W. 54th Street was restriped similarly and it has not generated the kind of responses either. Member lyer asked if Edina's communication was the same or different from Minneapolis and Director Houle said it was very similar. Member La Force asked if there have been any accidents since it was restriped and Director Houle said there have been two — one with a parked car and the other was a rear - ended. Other thoughts and suggestions were: removal of signs that are not required; W. 54th Street has symmetry with parking lanes on both sides; Minneapolis too has symmetry with parking lanes on both sides that are 5 often filled with parked cars while the parking lane on Wooddale is usually empty and gives the impression that it is a driving lane; adding yellow tabs could add more confusions and expectation of adding a permanent line. Director Houle said this project has a two year experimental timeframe from the Federal Highway and staff would need their approval as well as Mn /DOTs' to make changes. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTACHMENT Attendance spreadsheet. 1^ Wayne Houle From: Paul Nelson <pnelson @shawlundquist.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 4:32 PM To: Scott Neal; Wayne Houle Subject: October ETC meeting Scott and Wayne, I was out over the weekend, so am just getting to the packet today and. have just a few comments to share as 1 Will not be in attendance at the Thursday evening meeting. _ Item VI.B. Hennepin County, Pedestrian /Bicycle Plan My apologies to Ms. Rose Ryan for my not attending the meeting after setting up the meeting. Item.VI.C. Xerxes Avenue Restriping. I am iri'agreement with the decision to make this change, thank you for sharing this with the ETC. Item VI.D. Pedestrian'& Cyclist Safety Fund Policy. 1) • There is no escalation clause or opportunity for this fund to be increased over time. While I don't see the immediate need for this, I would anticipate that over time there will be a need to keep up with inflation, construction costs, employee costs. I am also not sure how this is handled in other areas of the City—so there may also be some coverage for this already. 2) As the policy relates to the lighting (safety) aspect, where do the funds come from for operational (electrical) expenses? Hopefully we will look at cost effective lighting (LED) fixtures, but with hundreds /thousands of new lights across the City there would be some increased expenses. Again, not -sure how this is handled for the existing dusk -to -dawn lighting currently in existence on our roadways. 3) Considering a new staff person specifically designated to handle this PACS Fund seems to be a luxury. While there is no doubt additional staff time required to initially set up a new decision matrix of needs /wants of the citizens and staff, the ongoing 1.0 FTE seems a bit excessive to me for this one area of expanded government. I don't know the actual answer to how much time should be allotted to this individual, but a full time person seems to be too much, even considering being the new liaison to the ETC. Item VI.E. Revised 2013 ETC Work Plan My packet did not have the work plan attached, perhaps it is being distributed at the meeting. Item VILA. Wayne, please make mention and perhaps list on- screen the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Study (DEIS) for the Southwest Transitway project. Other: Advisory Bike Lanes on Woodale /Valley View. Communication has been better since lanes have been striped, however I'd have felt better about getting the word out prior to this just happening and causing an uproar in the community. I do want to keep the lanes intact and feel that the majority of drivers now understand the "advisory" aspect of the lanes. However we do need to get permanent signage up as soon as feasible. Thanks for including the comments from the variety of citizens. Paul 1 TRANSPORTATION Type "1' under the month on the meetings' line. COMMISSION Regular Meeting w/o Quorum NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Bass, Katherine 2/1 /2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 82% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 73% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 82% lyer, Surya 2/1/2015 ;;' ;; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1 /2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1 /2015 ;_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100°/0 Nelson, Paul 211 /2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Schweiger, Steven student 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 73% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 2 100% Thompson, Michael 2/1 /2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1' under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1' under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type '1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1' under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type '1' under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. "A rescheduled meeting occurs when members ere notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice Is given, the previously - scheduled meeting Is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: