HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-02-14 EEC Meeting PacketAgenda
Energy and Environment Commission
City Of Edina, Minnesota
City Hall Community Room
Thursday, February 14, 2019
7:00 PM
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes
A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission January 10,
2019
V.Special Recognitions And Presentations
A.Recycling and Organics Contracted Services
VI.Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues
or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the
number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items
that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment.
Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their
comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for
consideration at a future meeting.
VII.Reports/Recommendations
A.Election of 2019 Chair and Vice Chair
B.Energy Benchmarking
VIII.Correspondence And Petitions
A.Correspondence
IX.Chair And Member Comments
A.Fresh Energy's Building Electri/cation Informational
X.Sta0 Comments
A.SolSmart Certi/cation
B.Ethical and Respectful Conduct Reminder
XI.Calendar Of Events
A.2019 EEC Schedule and Roster List
XII.Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public
process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli/cation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: IV.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
Minutes
From:Casey Casella, City Management Fellow
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission
January 10, 2019
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve the January 10, 2018 Minutes for the Energy and Environment Commission.
INTRODUCTION:
Receive the Energy and Environment Commission Minutes of January 10, 2018.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Minutes: January 10, 2019
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Energy and Environment Commission
Edina City Hall Community Room
Thursday, January 10, 2019, 7:00 PM
I. Call To Order
Chair Jackson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering Roll Call were Chair Jackson, Commissioners Horan, Hussian, Kostuch, Manser, Lanzas,
Satterlee, Hoffman, Glahn and Fernands
Late: Maynor
Absent: Seeley
Staff Present: Liaison Brown, Casey Casella
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to approve the January 10, 2019 meeting agenda. Horan
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion made by Commissioner Manser to approve the November 8, 2019 minutes. Motion seconded by
Kostuch. Motion carried.
Commissioner Maynor arrived at 7:03 PM.
VI. Community Comment
No community comments.
VII. Reports/Recommendation
A. 2019 EEC Work Plan
Commission walked through the commission’s work plan for 2019. Discussion topics were:
• Importance of student engagement in the organics engagement and business recognition initiatives.
• The business recognition initiative working group start meeting in February.
• The energy benchmarking initiative will need help with audits, production confidentiality and public
engagement.
o Commissioners Maynor, Satterlee, Lanzas, Hussian and Manser expressed interest in
working on the initiative.
• The pollinator initiative lead will have a meeting with Project Earth and two City staff.
• The climate action plan initiative lead will meet with Liaison Brown to discuss initial research
opportunities.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
B. Greater Southdale District Plan Consideration
The City Council is looking for comments on the district plan revision. Liaison Brown shared a brief
update of the ETC discussion at their last meeting. Chair Jackson and commissioner Manser mentioned
the storm water re-work of managing the system the City currently has.
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions
A. Working Group Minutes
• Minutes received from the EOWG Working Group.
IX. Chair And Member Comments
A. Advisory Communication
Commissioner Kostuch introduced an advisory communication regarding maintaining reliable GHG-free
electrical power by supporting removal of MN ban on new nuclear power plants.
Discussion topics on the advisory communication were:
• Minnesota’s nuclear power plant plans. Commissioners were interested in Xcel Energy’s nuclear
plan.
• The legislature’s involvement with nuclear legislation.
• There was expressed concern with the lack of information on the topic.
• There was concern with the price and commitment of building a nuclear reactor.
• There was discussion on the technology and the waste of the nuclear plants.
• There was discussion about the competitiveness of lifting the ban in Minnesota.
Motion made by Kostuch to approve the advisory communication and send the report to the
City Council. Glahn seconded. Commissioner Kostuch, Glash, Hoffman voted aye.
Commissioners Horan, Manser, Fernands voted nay. Commissioner Hussain, Lanzas and
Satterlee abstained. Motion does not prevail.
B. Chair Comments
a. Thanked Commissioner Kostuch for his 8 years of service to the Energy and
Environment Commission.
b. The Chair recommended looping the Mayor into youth groups that are outside out
community.
c. The Chair will be attending a meeting at Hennepin County about composting.
C. Student Commissioner Updates
a. Commissioner Fernand’s youth group It Can’t Wait met with Governor Walz in January.
b. The group It Can’t Wait has a state bill that will be sponsored by Rep. Hornstien.
c. There will be a Youth Climate Justice Summit at the MN Capitol this session.
d. Project Earth is conducting an initiative about school waste.
D. Commissioner Satterlee
a. Recommended to disband the Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG)
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
Commissioner Glahn made a motion to disband the EOWG. Hoffman second. All vote aye.
Motion prevails.
X. Staff Comments
Liaison Brown gave an oral update on organics.
A. Tree Grant
Liaison Brown presented an update on the staff’s submission to a Hennepin County Healthy Tree Canopy
Grant. Staff will hear on the outcome at the end of the month.
B. Solar Ordinance Passes
Management Fellow Casey gave an update about the final passage of a solar ordinance and the City’s
submission to the SolSmart certification.
C. Chloride Pollution Prevention
Management Fellow Casey gave an update on the advisory committee on the chloride pollution prevention
advisory committee.
XII. Calendar Changes
A. Work session date for the EEC has changed to April 2.
B. November meeting is not the second Thursday, it is the first Thursday Nov. 7.
XII. Adjournment
Motion made by Glahn to adjourn the January 10, 2019 meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion seconded by Lanzas.
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Casey Casella
City Management Fellow
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: V.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
Report and Recommendation
From:Solvei Wilmot, Recycling Coordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:Recycling and Organics Contracted Services Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Comment on Recycling Coordinator's recommendations.
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Recycling recommendation for Council
Organics recommendation for Council
Recycling and Organics Questions
07 09 2018 EEC review and comment
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
February 14, 2019
Energy and Environment Commission
Solvei Wilmot - Environmental Health Specialist/Recycling Coordinator, Tara Brown –
Sustainability Coordinator, Jeff Brown – Community Health Administrator
Residential Curbside Recycling Collection Provider Recommendation
Review and Comment on questions from memo ‘Recycling and Organics questions’.
Information / Background:
Edina has provided residential curbside recycling collection since 1985.
The current bi-weekly citywide 7-year contract for residential recycling collection with Republic Services
will end on December 31, 2019. As a result, a request for proposals for curbside residential recycling
collection was released. Three companies responded to the request for proposals: Republic Services,
Waste Management and Eureka Recycling. Proposers were permitted to submit alternate proposals to
allow for innovation or creative programs. Staff evaluated the proposals with respect to contract cost,
market variability, sustainability, and other factors. State and County waste reduction goals were also
considered during the evaluation of the proposals. The staff recommendation is as follows:
Accept Eureka Recycling’s alternate proposal for weekly residential recycling collection, and direct staff to
enter into contract negotiations with the company. This proposal is for a 7-year contract with weekly
recycling collection, including 100% revenue sharing with the City after processing costs. Total annual cost
to the City is dependent upon the market for recycling commodities, as these revenues are used to offset
processing costs. Staff anticipate approximately $7.80 monthly cost per household for weekly residential
recycling collection for 2020. The proposal includes 3% annual increases to base collection fees, in addition
to annual adjustments in response to commodity markets. The graphic below shows the 2019 bi-weekly
recycling contract rate per household and Eureka Recycling’s bi-weekly and weekly proposed rates for 2020.
As well as estimated market adjustments with commodity values averaging $54 per ton. As indicated, per
household cost will increase with either option.
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2
Proposed Monthly Household Recycling Fees
$54/Ton Commodity
Market Average
Current
Bi-Weekly
Eureka
New Bi-Weekly
Eureka
New Weekly
Contract Rate $2.84 $4.14 $6.47
Estimated Market
Adjustment $2.32 $1.33
Total Monthly Rate $6.46 $7.80
Eureka’s proposal expects the City to make up the deficit when commodity revenue does not cover
processing costs. Residential monthly collection fees will be adjusted annually to accommodate contract
terms and varying commodity revenues, and operating deficits.
Other factors that made Eureka the recommended vendor:
• Eureka’s commitment to education and capturing clean recyclables
• Customer service center and headquarters located in Minnesota
• No walk-up fee for residents that need this service
• A non-profit company with a vision to assist individuals, organizations, and communities in achieving
their zero waste goals
• Fleet management in regard to sustainability that was on par with competitors
• Are working on race and equity issues within their operations. Work includes starting a People of
Color and Indigenous People caucus, creating a Diversity and Inclusion committee, and providing an
annual Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Opportunity Report.
Accepting this proposal would mean a shift to weekly collection, rather than every other week. This is in an
effort to meet Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Hennepin County waste reduction goals, by
providing more frequent collection opportunities for residents and reducing the amount of recyclable
materials placed in the trash because of full recycling carts. Hennepin County waste sort, City of
Minneapolis Waste Characterization Study and Recycling Analysis, September 2016 revealed that
approximately 14.6% of trash is recyclable. Increasing collection frequency captures more recyclables and
improves service to residents.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
February 14, 2019
Energy and Environment Commission
Jeff Brown, Solvei Wilmot, Tara Brown
Residential Curbside Organics Collection Provider Recommendation
Review and Comment on questions from memo ‘Recycling and Organics questions’.
Information / Background:
A Hennepin County waste sort, City of Minneapolis Waste Characterization Study and Recycling Analysis,
from September 2016 revealed that 25% of trash is made up organic materials. This is the largest category
within the trash that could be diverted from landfilling. In an effort to meet Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency and Hennepin County waste reduction goals, the City of Edina put out a request for proposals for a
residential curbside organics collection contract. Four companies responded to the request for proposals:
Republic Services, Waste Management, Eureka Recycling and Vierkant Disposal. Proposers were permitted
to submit alternate proposals to allow for innovation or creative programs. Staff evaluated the proposals
with respect to contract cost, additional City staffing requirements, sustainability, and other factors. The
staff recommendation is as follows:
Accept Vierkant Disposal’s proposal for weekly residential organics collection, beginning in 2020. This
proposal is for a 5 year contract. Monthly collection cost per household for weekly organics collection is
proposed at $5.00 as the rate for all 5 years of the contract. One additional City staff member is necessary
for management of the program, including outreach and education to residents to support the positive
behavior change needed to meet waste reduction goals. Staffing costs would be added to the per household
cost, and are estimated to be $.50 to $.60 per household per month.
Not only will implementation reduce the amount of material in the trash, current Hennepin County grant
funding for recycling is being shifted to organics, which means there will be funding available to offset costs.
The funding is based on participation rates. Additionally, startup grants are available for cities who begin
programs in the next year, which may reduce program cost.
Other factors considered: Vierkant Disposal’s existing organics customer base in the City (approximately
11%), headquarters location in Bloomington, and commitment to customer service.
Energy and Environment Commission
February 14, 2019
Please see some policy questions below regarding the residential curbside recycling and organics collection proposals.
City Council will be interested in Energy and Environment Commission member comments regarding these items. Please
include responses to them with your other comments when submitted to City Council.
• What are the advantages of shifting curbside recyclable collection from bi-weekly to weekly? Who benefits from
this change? What are the collateral benefits/costs of the proposed change? What is the cost of this change? Is
the proposed increase in LOS worth the increase in cost?
• What are the benefits of a recyclables collection vendor that fixes their fee vs. one that floats their fee based on
their processing costs? What are the benefits and challenges to the City’s customer base if cost changes?
• Are the vendors bidding the recyclable collection contract equally vigilant about monitoring for contaminated
recyclables and driving customer behavior change? How should this factor into vendor choice?
• Should the City allow residents to “opt out” of the curbside recyclable and/or organics program? Is the City
prepared to levy the costs of the program on to all impacted residential properties to ensure higher participation
rates?
• Should the City be concerned with the business practices of the vendor it selects to provide this service? Who
will monitor this aspect of the contract? How should this factor into vendor choice?
• The total monthly cost to residents of the current level of service (LOS) (Bi-weekly Recycling) is much lower than
the total monthly cost to residents of the recommended LOS (Weekly Recycling + Organics Collection). Compare
the cost increase from current to proposed. Is the increase in service worth the increase in cost?
July 9, 2018
Mayor and City Council
Tara Brown, Liaison to Energy and Environment Commission
Residential Organics Recycling
Action Requested:
Select resident organics recycling policy to be implemented by staff.
Situation:
Energy and Environment Commission’s (EEC) 2018 Work Plan charges the commission to
‘Review and comment on policy options for residential organics recycling.’ Below are the EEC’s
comments on this report and the recommendation.
Background:
Attached is the staff report dated, June 8, 2018 listing the policy options for the EEC to review.
Council stated their goal was to increase the residential organic recycling rate. Based on
Council’s goal, staffed recommended that while all policies have trade-offs, the policy that will go
beyond incremental increase in organic recycling rates and has proven results in the metro area
is creating a policy and program around curbside organics recycling. Staff recommended starting
a program that would bid out with the next recycling program, and would require one full-time
person to manage the RFP, launch the program, and manage the program.
EEC Commissioner
Comments:
Fernands – It’s reinforced in society at schools and wouldn’t be a huge societal shift. It was a
success in other cities
Glahn – Edina simply can't afford to be the region's leader on every single issue. I'm comfortable
in letting other communities take the lead on this topic. I don't see that the bottom line benefit
is worth the cost to the city's citizens and consumers at this time. Let other communities work
out the bugs in a program for citywide organics recycling and then we can reconsider later.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Horan – I support the recommendation and it’s the best way to have organics recycling received.
We’ve seen other cities succeed. Our kids are doing it at school, and it would allow them to
continue the practice at home, help their parents and establish lifelong behaviors. Food in
landfills is a huge production of methane gas.
Hoffman – I support as proposed.
Hussain – I’m undecided as to whether the proposal is what I agree as there are too many
unknowns and variables. For our house, there is more recycling than garbage.
Jackson – It addresses the inertia to get people to make the change. I support a residential
organics recycling policy as proposed. We should piggyback on the recycling RFP.
Kostuch – This would be a rate charged to all households. Currently recycling cost is $23.80,
the other cities with organics and recycling is $60 which will be double the current recycling
rate. As a resident, the Council is getting very good on indirect taxation and that will cause a
problem down the road.
Manser - Having lived in a City that has a successful organics recycling program, it took the path
of mandatory organics recycling. A fundamental component of GHG reduction is to keep
organics out of landfills. I am sensitive of the cost of organics recycling to Edina residents, but the
hidden cost of continuing to send food waste to landfills and the true cost of not recycling
organics is greater. I support the solution provided.
Satterlee – The case studies and related data from other city's methods of implementing organics
recycling programs detailed in the report demonstrate that the method recommended in the
report is the most likely to result in Edina achieving success with organics recycling. This is the
same model that was successful for Edina in increasing traditional recycling participation rates
significantly. The know from engagement with residents that there is interest. We can issue a
RFP with the recycling contract and then make a recommendation on implementation based on
the results of the RFP.
Seeley – I support the recommendation.
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
From:Carolyn Jackson, EEC Chair
Item Activity:
Subject:Election of 2019 Chair and Vice Chair Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Commission to vote on Chair and Vice Chair for 2019.
INTRODUCTION:
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: VII.B.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
From:Carolyn Jackson, EEC Chair
Item Activity:
Subject:Energy Benchmarking
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Benchmarking and beyond
Energy
Benchmarking
What are the benefits of benchmarking?
• Help building owners understand building
performance
• Supports meeting Minnesota’s GreenStep Cities program
• Supports city climate action plans
• Building peer comparison
• Create a demand for energy efficiency in the property market
With over $80 million spent on gas and electric in Edina, there is a large potential for
energy savings
Two basic policy arms:
1. Benchmarking and disclosure
2. Advanced policies (a.k.a ‘beyond benchmarking’)
a. Energy efficiency study or audits
b. Timing of disclosure
c. Required energy upgrades
City examples:
Energy
Benchmarking
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: VIII.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
From:
Item Activity:
Subject:Correspondence
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Correspondence from resident
Attachment to Correspondence
City of Edina Correspondence Submission
Correspondence
Selection *
Data Practices Advisory:
Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all Board or Commission members. You are not required to
complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name, street address or your email address, your
comments will not be sent to the Board or Commission members.
Open Meeting Law
Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Members cannot
engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You
might also receive a response from a City staff member.
Name *
Street Address
City
State
Zip Code
Phone Number
Email
Comments *
File Upload
By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above.
Energy & Environment Commission
Janey Westin
6136 Brookview Ave.
Edina
MN
55424
6128343799
no dashes or spaces
janeywestin@usa.net
Please read the attached--
A Proposal for a Building Height and Shadow Solution
Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png
A Proposal for a Building Height and Shadow
Solution.pdf
219.44KB
A Proposal for a Building Height and Shadow Solution:
A Sunlight Setback
As developers in Edina press for more height in buildings (both residential and commercial), and
as utilization of solar power becomes more necessary in regard to climate change, solutions to
this issue are sought. I am going to throw out to you an idea for solving this problem that may
seem radical at first, but makes quite a bit of sense. So, here goes…
A Sunlight Setback requirement:
Require that all new buildings (starting with the second floor and going up) must step back a
certain distance on all sides, so as to never cast a shadow across its property boundary lines at
ground level between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm in any given season of the year.
Developers would most likely roll their eyes at this prospect, and many architects, too.
HOWEVER, this could be an intriguing challenge for others to take up. A bit of astronomy and
math will give the needed step-back requirements.
This Sunlight Setback requirement would erase all objections from neighbors to having a lack of
sun in our long winters affecting their mental health and property values. This would encourage
solar panel installation, reducing carbon emissions. It would allow better sunlight conditions for
more trees and greenery to be planted around buildings to help cool and clean the air. Every
floor could have a walkout deck with more plantings and gardens on them. That top floor
penthouse or office suite would bring top dollar.
It would simply make people happier. Wild idea? Maybe not.
Janey Westin
6136 Brookview Ave., Edina MN 55424
612-834-3799
January 23, 2019
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: IX.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
From:Carolyn Jackson, EEC Chair
Item Activity:
Subject:Fresh Energy's Building Electrification Informational
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
INTRODUCTION:
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: X.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
Other
From:Casey Casella, City Management Fellow
Item Activity:
Subject:SolSmart Certification Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Casey Casella will provide a verbal update on the SolSmart Gold certification for the City of Edina.
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: X.B.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
Other
From:Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:Ethical and Respectful Conduct Reminder Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Tara Brown will provide a reminder about the Ethical and Respectful Conduct of Boards and Commissions at the
City of Edina.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Ch. 5 of Commission Guidebook: Ethical and Respectful Conduct
5. Ethical and Respectful Conduct
Boards and Commissions New Member Orientation Binder
Conflict of Interest
Definition: any member who has a financial interest in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any
BC action or if there is potential for the appearance of conflict of interest.
Members who have a conflict of interest must:
• Disclose the conflict of interest to the group, and
• Abstain from discussing or voting on the matter.
Gifts
• Members may not receive gifts from any “interested person” in conjunction with their BC duties.
• BC can recommend acceptance of general gifts through the City’s donation policy.
Respectful Behavior
Members should strive to:
• Treat people with courtesy, politeness and kindness.
• Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas.
• Listen to what others have to say.
• Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes.
• Recognize cultural differences.
Members should avoid:
• Speaking over or cutting off another individual’s comments.
• Insulting, disparaging or putting down people or their ideas.
• Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing
comments.
Violence or the threat of violence is not tolerated.
The Chair or the Staff Liaison can call for the removal of any anyone who threatens or commits an act
of violence.
Code of Ethics
• I have been entrusted by the Edina City Council to perform my duties and services as a volunteer
Board or Commission Member in manner that is always in the best interests of the community of
Edina.
• While honest differences of opinion may develop, I will work harmoniously with other Board or
Commission members to assure residents the services they require.
• I will invite all residents to express their opinions so I may be properly informed prior to making
my decisions. I will make them based solely upon the facts available to me. I will support the final
decision of the Board or Commission.
Ethical and Respectful Conduct 1 | Page
• I must devote the time, study and thought necessary to carry out my duties.
• I understand that the Board or Commission members recommend policies, the City Council
establishes policies and the staff is responsible for administering the policies of the City Council.
• I understand that as a Board or Commission Member, I have no authority outside of the proper
meeting of the Board.
• I understand that all Board meetings shall be open to the public, except as provided by law.
• I understand that it is my duty as a Board or Commission member to treat all residents, staff and
fellow Board and Commission members in a respectful and professional manner at all times.
• I will withdraw from discussions and decision-making actions in cases where I have a conflict of
interest and I will disclose those conflicts of interest when they arise.
Ethical and Respectful Conduct 2 | Page
Date: February 14, 2019 Agenda Item #: XI.A.
To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type:
Other
From:Casey Casella, City Management Fellow
Item Activity:
Subject:2019 EEC Schedule and Roster List Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
See attachment for schedule and roster list as of February 4th, 2019.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
2019 EEC Meeting and Roster List Final
2019 Meetings and Events
Day Date Event Time Location
Thurs Jan 10 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs Feb 14 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Mon Mar 11 NEW: Open House for Comp Plan 6:30 pm Public Works
Thurs Mar 14 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs April 11 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Mon April 15 Volunteer Recognition 5:00 pm Braemar Golf Course
Tues April 16 Work Session w/ City Council 5:30 pm Community Room
Tues April 30 BC Member Annual Reception 6:00 pm Braemar Golf Course
Thurs May 9 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs June 13 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs July 11 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs August 8 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs Sept 12 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs Oct 10 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs Nov 7* Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Thurs Dec 12 Regular Meeting 7:00 pm Community Room
Attendance at Regular Meetings and Rescheduled Regular Meetings are counted towards attendance policy.
*Note: November meeting is the first Thursday in November
Chair and Vice Chair specific meetings
Tues April 30 Chair and Vice Chair Annual Meeting 5:00 pm Braemar Golf Course
Tues Oct 1 2020 Work Plan Review w/ Council (Chair only) 5:30 pm Community Room
Roster
Name Email
Glahn, Bill billglahn@aol.com
Fernands, Maddy maddyfernands@gmail.com
Hoffman, Howard howard.hoffman@gmail.com
Horan, Michelle mhoran00@gmail.com
Hussian, Paul pahussian@hotmail.com
Jackson, Carolyn
(Chair) bjandcj@aol.com
Lanzas, Bayardo blanzas@artaxstudio.com
Manser, Richard
(Vice Chair) richardmanser@icloud.com
Maynor, Chloe chloem20475@isd273.org
Satterlee, Lauren lauren.mpls.mn@gmail.com
Seeley, Melissa msee10@me.com
Brown, Tara (Liaison) tbrown@edinamn.gov
Casella, Casey (City Fellow) ccasella@edinamn.gov