Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-02_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 2, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items (narked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of July 20, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL - SOLUTION NO. 2010 -45 COMMENDING BOYS HOCKEY TEAM RESOLUTION NO. 2010-46 COMMENDING GIRLS TENNIS TEAM RESOLUTION NO. 2010-47 COMMENDING BOYS SWIMMING & DIVING TEAM 2010 IMAGES OF EDINA PHOTO CONTEST AWARDS * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 20, 2010 and Work Sessions of July 20, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During 'Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. Agenda /Edina City Council August 2, 2010 Page 2 A. PUBLIC HEARING — SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement No. S -106, Resolution No. 2010 -65 (Favorable majority vote of Council Members to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING — SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No. S -104 Resolution No. 2010 -66 (Favorable majority vote of Council Members to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING — AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN — Resolution No. 2010 -67 Cypress Equities (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members to approve.) III. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Affirmative of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A Resolution No. 2010 -63 Accepting Various (Affirmative vote of four Council Members to approve) * B. Shops At Yorkdale Amendment To Reciprocal Agreement C. Second Reading Ordinance No. 2010 -11 Amending Student Membership Provisions to Boards, Committees and Commissions (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) D Resolution No. 2010 -68 Setting the Interim City Manager Salary E. Request Authorization To Apply For Local Government Renewable Energy Grant Program IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. V. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated July 22, TOTAL $937,534.14; and Pre -List dated July 29, 2010, TOTAL $1,528,979.96. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence Mon Mon Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council August 2, 2010 Page 3 VII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS VIII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Aug 2 Work Session — PDI, City Manager 4:30 — 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 2 Work Session — Variance Issues & Dispatch Services 5:00 — 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 3 Night To Unite Aug 3 Filing Opens — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy CITY CLERKS OFFICE Aug 10 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Aug 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 17 Filing Closes — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy CITY CLERKS OFFICE Aug 24 Study Session — Budget Review 11:30 A.M. —1:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 24 City Manager Applicant Interviews With City Council 4:30 — 8:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sep 6 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sep 21 Work Session — Utility Budget & CIP Review 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sep 28 Study Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review 4:30 — 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 5 Work Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review Cont. 5:00 — 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 26 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM PO Work Session Staff Report To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. From: Heather Worthington Assistant City Manager ❑ Action ® Discussion Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject:. Discussion regarding contracting emergency dispatching services with City of Golden Valley to provide INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina was approached several months ago to provide a proposal for emergency dispatching services for the City of Golden Valley. Edina, St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis submitted proposals. Currently, Golden Valley contracts with St. Louis Park. Golden Valley.has informed Edina that they are interested in moving forward with the negotiation of a contract for the provision of emergency dispatching services. Staff is.in the process of determining a timeline for the transfer of services from St. Louis Park to Edina, and has researched the impact on Edina in the following areas: 1. Call Volume 2. Impact on staffing needs 3. Technology needs and costs Call Volume: Currently, Edina's peak call volume is at 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Golden Valley's peak call volume is at 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Golden Valley handles administrative calls on a 24 -hour basis, therefore only 9 -1 -1 and non- emergency calls (such as burglar or fire alarms) would be routed to the Edina PSAP. The number of police and fire Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) events processed annually would be increased by approximately 18,000 per year, including traffic stops (includes fire calls). 9-1=1 trunk line and non - emergency call volume has not yet been received. Golden Valley maintains a 24 -hour NCIC terminal at their station and handles routine hot files and criminal history checks in- house. Staffing Needs and Costs: Based upon the increased call -load generated by consolidation, it is recommended that 2 additional full -time dispatchers be hired to. maintain minimum staffing levels as follows: Three dispatchers on -duty during peak hours (approximately 8:00a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) Two dispatchers during non -peak hours with the possibility of reducing to one dispatcher between the hours of 3:00am and 6:00 a.m., when call volume for both agencies is at its lowest. The. staffing minimum ensures that a consistently high level of service is provided. For 2009, the average full -time salary (including overtime, training pay, working alone pay) was $56,616.51. We estimate that our benefits package equals 30% of the salary; therefore, the average salary plus benefits is $73,601.46, (including overtime, training and, working alone pay). This figure is on the high side because the majority of our staff have higher salaries due to longevity. Using this average, the cost of adding two full -time positions would be $147,202.92 in 2010 dollars. Edina's proposal was $145,000; however, that number did not include ongoing technology costs, and would have to be revised to reflect higher personnel costs. . Technology Needs and Costs: One -time upgrades to our Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system, as well as server expansion. would total $37,500. Golden Valley would have the option to include mobile computer terminals in their car at the cost of approximately $1,200 each. Qwest has advised Edina that it can handle additional telephone trunk activity with no further trunk lines added.. There will be minimal costs for moving emergency service numbers from St. Louis Park to Edina. Golden Valley will need to change their published non - emergency number to Edina's non - emergency 24 hour number. Dispatchers will answer non - emergency calls "Police and Fire "; 911 calls for both agencies will be answered "9 -1 -1 emergency ". Because both police agencies operate on the 800 MHz frequency, they will share main and secondary talk groups or channels. The two fire departments will operate on separate channels unless it is determined that sharing a channel would be beneficial. Golden Valley does not operate an ambulance services. Proposed Next Steps: Staff would propose that we introduce, at the next council meeting, a recommendation to allow the Interim City Manager and Police Chief to negotiate a contract with Golden Valley for the provision of 911 Emergency Dispatch Services. We anticipate that it would take approximately one month to draft and negotiate such an agreement. Once completed, we would bring that agreement back to the City Council for consideration. Concurrently, we would be developing a final timeline and budget for implementation of this agreement. We have additional work to do in the area of technical specifications for the transfer of services from St. Louis Park to Edina. City of Edina Planning. Dept.,- .' To: " Mayor and Council From: Jackie Hoogenakker a Date: Monday, August 2, 20101 . Re:. Pre - Council Work Session /Ruling State of Minnesota in Supreme Court A08 -1988 Front of packet material. Please find the attached Supreme Court decision filed June 24, 2010. I_ 1 Court of Appeals Beat L. Krummenacher, vs. City of Minnetonka, JoAnne K. Liebeler, STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT Appellant, Respondent, Respondent. Gildea, J. Took no part, Dietzen, J. Filed: June 24, 2010 Office of Appellate Courts Paul W. Chamberlain, Ryan R. Kuhlmann, Chamberlain Law Firm, Wayzata, Minnesota, for appellant. George C. Hoff, Shelley M. Ryan, Hoff, Barry & Kozar, P.A., Eden Prairie, Minnesota, for respondent City of Minnetonka. James M. Susag, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren Ltd., Bloomington, Minnesota, for respondent JoAnne Liebeler. Susan L. Naughton, St. Paul, Minnesota, for amicus curiae League of Minnesota Cities. 1 SYLLABUS 1. Although Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le(a) (2008), restricts the ability of property owners to expand their nonconforming uses, subdivision le(b) authorizes a municipality to allow an expansion pursuant to ordinance. Because the legislature gave the municipality discretion to authorize the expansion of a nonconforming use, the decision to allow respondent to seek a variance under the ordinance to expand a nonconformity was consistent with Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le. 2. Under Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6, to establish the "undue hardship" required for a variance, a variance applicant must establish that "the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use" without the variance. 3. Because the municipality applied the wrong standard, a remand for reconsideration of respondent's variance application under the correct standard is appropriate. Reversed and remanded. OPINION GILDEA, Justice. This case involves the decision of respondent City of Minnetonka to grant a variance to respondent JoAnne Liebeler so that she could expand her nonconforming garage. Appellant Beat Krummenacher is Liebeler's neighbor and he challenges the City's decision. The district court upheld the City's variance, and the court of appeals affirmed. See Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 768 N.W.2d 377, 384 (Minn. App. 2009). Because we conclude that the City applied the wrong standard to Liebeler's 2 variance request; .we reverse and remand to the City for reconsideration under the correct standard. s Liebeler owns property located in Minnetonka. Krummenacher is Liebeler's neighbor to. the west. Liebeler's property consists of a 2.4 -acre lot, which contains a 2,975 - square 400t home and an attached two -car garage The property also contains, a detached flat - roofed garage that -a previous owner constructed sometime in. thele 1940s. The City has an ordinance requiring that the detached garage be set back a minimum of 50 feet fr "om the property's boundary line. Minnetonka City Code § 300.10. Liebeler's garage was constructed before this ordinance went into effect, and it does not satisfy the setback requirement.. Specifically, the "garage is nonconforming because it is set back ,only. 17 feet from the front yard lot line. Because the garage was constructed before the ordinance became effective, however, the garage is a permissible nonconformity. On March 31, 2008, Liebeler applied for a variance to expand the detached garage by adding a pitched roof and a second -story room above the garage that could be used as a yoga studio and craft room. Liebeler's proposal was to renovate the garage itself, both to fx its leakage problems and improve its appearance, and also to expand the garage by adding a living space above. it. Because adding a second story to the garage would result in a vertical expansiorii of ' a nonconforming structure, Liebeler was required, under the Minnetonka City Code, to apply for a variance from the City.' $66 Minnetonka City 1 It appears that Liebeler did not attempt to move the garage to a conforming location because the unusual characteristics of the lot made relocation impracticable. Liebeler's lot is L- shaped with only 45 -feet of frontage on the road. Moreover, there is a (Footnote continued on next page.) 3 Code § 300.29.3(g). Liebeler's proposed addition would not alter the footprint of the garage and would comply with the City zoning requirements for a detached garage with respect to maximum height and size. The City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15, 2008, to consider Liebeler's request. Both Liebeler and Krummenacher had an opportunity to present their arguments at that hearing. Liebeler explained that she believed that the flat roof was causing leakage problems and that the structure itself needed to be updated. Krummenacher objected to Liebeler's proposed project, explaining that the added height of the garage would obstruct his view to the east. The Planning Commission approved Liebeler's request for the variance. The Planning Commission based its decision on the following findings: (1) the denial of a variance would cause "undue hardship" because of the "topography of the site, width of the lot, location of the driveway, and existing vegetation "; (2) the preexisting nonconforming setback was a "unique circumstance "; (3) Liebeler's proposal would comply with the "intent of the ordinance" because it satisfied the "zoning ordinance requirements for a detached garage for maximum height and size" and did not alter the footprint of the garage; and (4) the proposal would not alter the "neighborhood character" because it would "visually enhance the exterior of the garage" and because there was (Footnote continued from previous page.) significant slope immediately behind the garage, making it difficult to move the garage back. 0 another detached garage on a nearby property that was also set back only 17 feet from the road. Krummenacher appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the Minnetonka City Council. The City Council held a public hearing on the variance request on June 30, 2008, at which both sides presented their arguments. After an examination of the record, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision and findings. The City Council found that Liebeler's "proposal is reasonable and would meet the required standards for a variance." The council listed four requirements and found that the variance satisfied those requirements as follows: (1) Undue Hardship: there is an undue hardship due to the topography of the site, width of the lot, location of the driveway and existing vegetation. (2) Unique Circumstance: The existing, non - conforming setback is a circumstance that is not common to every similarly zoned property. (3) Intent of the Ordinance:. The improvements would not increase the footprint of the garage, and would comply with the zoning ordinance requirements for a detached garage for maximum height and size. (4) Neighborhood Character: The garage improvements would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The improvements would visually enhance the exterior of the garage. There is also a detached garage on the property to the east that is set back 17 feet from [the street]. Krummenacher then brought suit in district court challenging, among other things, the City's finding of undue hardship. Krummenacher served discovery requests asking for additional documents from the City, but the City objected to providing more than the City's record on the grounds that the case was properly subject to record review. The court declined to order the City to produce the additional documents, and affirmed the 5 City's decision to grant the variance to Liebeler, concluding that the City's decision was not "arbitrary and capricious." Krummenacher appealed to the court of appeals. On appeal, he raised three issues. First, he argued that Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le(a) (2008), prohibits the City from granting a variance to allow the expansion of a nonconforming use. Krummenacher, 768 N.W.2d at 380 -81. Second, he argued that the City's approval of the variance request was "arbitrary and capricious" because Liebeler had failed to meet the "undue hardship" standard of Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. See Krummenacher, 768 N.W.2d at 382 -84. Last, he argued that the district court erred in refusing to compel additional discovery by the City. See %d. at 384. The court of appeals affirmed the district court's decision in all respects. We granted Krummenacher's petition for review. On appeal to our court, Krummenacher advances the same three arguments he made to the court of appeals . 2 I. We turn first to Krummenacher's argument that Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le, prohibits a municipality from granting a variance that allows for the expansion of a nonconforming structure. Section 462.357, subdivision le, provides in relevant part: (a) Any nonconformity, including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this chapter, may be continued, including through repair, Z On January 26, 2010, Liebeler filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that we should dismiss the case on the grounds that construction of the expanded garage has been completed, rendering Krummenacher's claims moot. The motion to dismiss is denied. 2 replacement, -restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion .... (b), A municipality may, by ordinance, permit an expansion or impose upon nonconformities reasonable regulations to prevent and abate nuisances and to protect the public health, welfare, or safety. 3 (Emphasis added. Krummenacher argues that because the plain language of paragraph (a) of subdivision le prohibits the expansion of any nonconformity, the City's decision allowing Liebeler to expand her nonconforming garage must be reversed. The _City argues that subdivision le(a) restricts the ability of property owners to expand nonconforming uses, but that under subdivision 1 e(b), a municipality is permitted to allow an expansion pursuant to ordinance. The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Clark v, LindquiSt,-683 N.W.2d 784, 785 (Minn. 2004).4 To interpret a statute, we first assess 3 In its brief, the City cites the 2009 version of section 462. 357, subdivision le(a) which reads: Except as otherwise provided by law, any nonconformity, including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this chapter, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion .... Minn. Stat. § 462.357.(Supp., 2009) (new language in italics). The "except as otherwise provided" language in this version of subdivision 1e(a), however; did not become, effective until May 22, 2009, which was. after the City granted the variance. See Act of . May 21, 2009, ch. 149, § 45 2009 Minn. Laws 2025, 2028. We therefore do not rely on this version of the statute. We apply the 2008 version of subdivision le, the version of the`statute in' effect when the variance was granted: 4 Liebeler did not propose to expand the footprint of her garage, and it is undisputed that even- as remodeled the garage would still be 17 feet from the yard line. In other (Footnote continued on next page.) 7 , "whether the statute's language, on its face, is clear or ambiguous." Am. Family Ins. Group v. Sehroedl, 616 N.W.2d 273, 277 (Minn. 2000). If the law is "clear and free from all ambiguity," the plain meaning controls and is not "disregarded under the pretext of pursuing the spirit." Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2008); Phelps V. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 537 N.W.2d 271, 274 (Minn. 1995) ( "Where the intention of the legislature is clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language ... no construction is necessary or permitted. "). The legislature has also stated that it intends the entire statute to be effective. Minn. Stat. § 645.16 ( "Every law shall be construed, if possible, to give effect to all its provisions. "). This case is about a structure that does not conform with local land use restrictions. We have recognized that a local zoning ordinance "may constitutionally prohibit the creation of uses which are nonconforming." County of Freeborn v. Claussen, 295 Minn. 96, 99, 203 N.W.2d 323, 325 (1972). As to "existing nonconforming uses," however, these "must either be permitted to remain or be eliminated by use of eminent domain." Id. But a local government "is not required" to permit the expansion of such nonconformities. Id. Subdivision le is consistent with these principles. We read the subdivision in its entirety and give effect to both paragraph (a) and paragraph (b). Minn. Stat. § 645.16; (Footnote continued from previous page.) words, the scope of the nonconformity would not be expanded if Liebeler's request were granted. The City nevertheless concedes that the variance sought an "expansion" for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le, and we treat it as such for purposes of this opinion. see also In re Kenney, 374 N.W.2d 271, 274 (Minn. 1985) ( "A statute will be construed so as to give effect to all of its parts. "). In paragraph (a), the legislature, with certain exceptions not relevant here, prohibits a municipality from ordering the removal of nonconformities.5 Further, the legislature has given property owners the right to repair or replace a nonconformity so long as they do not expand the nonconformity. In other words, as long as the property owner does not expand the nonconformity, she does not need municipal approval to take corrective or remedial action on the nonconformity. But under paragraph (b), if the property owner seeks to expand the nonconformity, the municipality may, by ordinance, permit the expansion. Consistent with the authority the legislature granted to it in paragraph (b) of subdivision le, the City has an ordinance that addresses the expansion of nonconformities. See Minnetonka City Code § 300.29(g)(1). This ordinance provides that "an expansion of any non - conforming use may not.be done without first obtaining a variance." /d. Liebeler's proposed addition to her detached garage required a variance because she proposed to "occup[y] space within a non - conforming area that was previously not occupied ... vertically." /d. Krummenacher argues that because state law is superior to municipal law, the City cannot grant a variance pursuant to its own ordinance if that variance violates state law. 5 The statute allows the municipality to require a nonconformity to be discontinued when it "is discontinued for a period of more than one year," or "is destroyed by fire or other peril to the extent of greater than 50 percent of its market value, and no building permit has been applied for within 180 days of when the property is damaged." Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le(a)(1) and (2). D See Denney v. City of Duluth, 295 Minn. 22, 26, 202 N.W.2d 892, 894 (1972) ( "It is fundamental that a municipality's power to regulate land use by zoning exists by virtue of authority delegated to it by the state. "). But Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le(b), grants the City the discretion to permit the expansion of a nonconformity by ordinance. The City provided a mechanism for expansion in section 300.29(g)(1), through a variance application, and Krummenacher makes no argument that Liebeler's request for a variance did not satisfy that section of the City Code. Because the legislature gave the City discretion to authorize the expansion of Liebeler's nonconforming garage, we hold that the City's decision to allow Liebeler to seek a variance under the ordinance to expand a nonconformity was consistent with Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. le. Il. We turn next to Krummenacher's argument that the City's decision must be set aside because it was arbitrary and capricious. Municipalities have "broad discretionary power" in considering whether to grant or deny a variance. VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights, 336 N.W.2d 503, 508 (Minn. 1983). We review such decisions "to determine whether the municipality "was within its jurisdiction, was not mistaken as to the applicable law, and did not act arbitrarily, oppressively, or unreasonably, and to determine whether the evidence could reasonably support or justify the determination." In re Stadsvold, 754 N.W.2d 323, 332 (Minn. 2008) (internal quotation omitted). 10 A. Krummenacher argues that the City's decision was arbitrary and capricious because the City did not apply the proper standard to determine whether Liebeler demonstrated "undue hardship" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. This provision allows a city to grant a variance "from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration." Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. Minnesota Statutes § 462.357, subd. 6, provides a definition of "undue hardship," and that definition requires that three factors be met. Specifically, the statute defines "undue hardship" as meaning, the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. /d.6 To receive a variance, the applicant must show that he or she meets all of the three statutory requirements of the "undue hardship" test. /d. In addition to satisfying the "undue hardship" requirement, the statute allows municipalities to grant variances only 6 The Minnetonka City Code has almost identical provisions. Minnetonka City Code § 300.07.1(a) ( "A variance may be granted from the literal provisions of this ordinance in instances where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and when it is demonstrated that such actions would be consistent with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. Undue hardship means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by this ordinance, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. "). 11 "when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance." /d. Krummenacher argues that Liebeler's application does not meet any of the requirements for "undue hardship." The first factor a variance applicant must establish to satisfy the statute's definition of "undue hardship" is that "the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls." Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6; see also Minnetonka City Code § 300.07.1(a). Krummenacher argues that based on the plain and unambiguous language of the statute, a municipality may grant a variance only when the property cannot be put to any reasonable use without it. According to Krummenacher, Liebeler had a reasonable use for her garage without the addition of a yoga studio and craft room —its current use as a storage space for vehicles. Krummenacher argues therefore that the City did not have the statutory authority to grant the variance. The court of appeals rejected this argument, relying on its decision in Rowell V. Board of Adjustment of Moorhead, 446 N.W.2d 917 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec. 15, 1989). The court in that case interpreted the "undue hardship" section of Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6, as requiring a variance applicant to show that the "property owner would like to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance." /d. at 922. The City urges that we should embrace the interpretation of "undue hardship" from Rowe //, and it appears from the record that the Rowell "reasonable manner" standard is the standard the City used in evaluating Liebeler's request for a variance. The City 12 determined that the expansion of the garage was a reasonable use of the property and that the request met the other requirements of the statute. Specifically, as reflected in the City Council Resolution, the City found that "the proposal is reasonable" and with respect to "undue hardship," that "[t]here is an undue hardship due to the topography of the site, width of the lot, location of the driveway and existing vegetation." The plain language of the statute and our precedent compel us to reject the City's invitation to adopt ROWelt s interpretation of "undue hardship." The statute provides that to prove "undue hardship," the variance applicant must show that "the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use" without the variance. Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. Notwithstanding this language, the court of appeals concluded that "[t]his provision does not mean that a property owner must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance." ROWS //, 446 N.W.2d at 922. The court of appeals essentially rewrote the statute to mean that a municipality may grant a variance when the "property owner would like to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance." /d. at 922. Although the ROWOH "reasonable manner" standard has been used for over 20 years, we simply cannot reconcile that standard with the plain language of the statute. The ROWOH standard is also inconsistent with our precedent. In support of the application of a "reasonable manner" standard for determining "undue hardship," ROWOH cites Curry v. Young, 285 Minn. 387, 173 N.W.2d 410 (1969), for the proposition that a variance is "required where a setback requirement would force a property owner to build a much smaller structure." /d. at 922. The version of Minn. Stat. § 462.357 in effect 13 when Curry was decided did not contain the definition of "undue hardship" that is in the current version of the statute. See Minn. Stat. § 462.357 (1969). Moreover, while we discussed in Curry the dimensions of a structure that could theoretically be built to comply with the statutory requirements, we based our determination that the variance was properly granted on the municipality's ordinance. That ordinance required a showing of "particular hardship," and we concluded that the standard was met because the "plaintiffs' lot, in the absence of a variance, would be unusable for any purpose." Curry, 285 Minn. at 388 -89, 396, 173 N.W.2d at 411, 415. The standard we applied in Curryis more rigorous than the "reasonable manner" standard adopted in Rowell, and appears consistent with the plain language of the first part of the "undue hardship" definition that is in the current statute. See Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. In addition, in formulating the "reasonable manner" standard, the court in Rowell appears to have relied on the "practical difficulties" standard.' See Rowell, 446 N.W.2d at 922. But we have made a clear distinction between the "practical difficulties" standard and the "undue hardship" standard. See Stadsvold, 754 N.W.2d at 328 -31. As we explained in Stadsvold, the "practical difficulties" standard applies to review of county decisions to grant area variances, while the "undue hardship" standard applies to all In support of the application of this standard, the court of appeals cited Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonough, 297 Minn. 285, 289 -90, 210 N.W.2d 416, 419 (1973), overruled on other grounds by Northwestern College v. City of Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865, 868 n.4 (Minn. 1979). As in Curry, the version of Minn. Stat. § 462.357 in effect when Merriam Park was decided did. not contain the definition of "undue hardship" that is in the current version of the statute. See 297 Minn. at 289 -90, 210 N.W.2d at 418 -19 (quoting statute). 14 municipal decisions to grant variances. /d. at 327 -28 & n.2. Compare Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6, with Minn. Stat. § 394.27, subd. 7 (2008).8 In StadSVold, we interpreted Minn. Stat. § 394.27, subd. 7, which sets forth the statutory standard for county variances. This statute contains both the "practical difficulties" standard and a "particular hardship" standard. Specifically, section 394.27 authorizes a county to grant variances from "the terms of any official control" but only when the property owner would face "practical difficulties or particular hardship" in meeting "the strict letter of any official control." Minn. Stat. § 394.27, subd. 7.9 We distinguished the "less rigorous `practical difficulties' " standard that applies to area variance applications from the more rigorous "particular hardship" standard that applies to use variance applications. StadSVO /d, 754 N.W.2d at 330 -31.'0 8 While Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6, and Minn. Stat. § 394.27, subd. 7, both set forth standards for granting variances, section 462.357, subdivision 6, applies to municipalities and section 394.27, subdivision 7, applies to counties. 9 The same dichotomy of language at issue in StadSVold existed in the predecessor to the municipal zoning statute, section 462.357. Until 1965, section 462.22 (enacted in 1929, repealed in 1965) granted municipalities the power to vary or modify the application of a zoning regulation where there were "practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship" in complying with the strict letter of the regulation. Minn. Stat. § 462.22 (1961). In 1965, the legislature replaced Minn. Stat. § 462.22 with Minn. Stat. § 462.357. Act of May 22, 1965, c. 670, § 7, 1965 Minn. Laws 995, 1000 -03. The new statute replaced the "practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship" standard with the current single "undue hardship" standard. /d. "Undue hardship" was undefined in the statute until 1982, when the legislature, borrowing the definition of "hardship" from the county variance statute, Minn. Stat. § 394.27, added the current definition of "undue hardship" to the statute. Act of Mar. 22, 1982, ch. 507, § 22, 1982 Minn. Laws 592, 593. 10 As we discussed in StadSVold, "[t]here are two types of variances: use variances and area variances. `A use variance permits a use or development of land other than that (Footnote continued on next page.) 15 Adopting the Rowell "reasonable manner" standard would be inconsistent with the distinction we made in Stadsvold between the "practical difficulties" and "hardship" standards. The legislature defined the "hardship" standard in the county statute the same way it defined the "undue hardship" standard in the municipal statute." Because the legislature used the same language in both the county and city variance statutes when defining "hardship," our analysis in Stadsvold requires us to conclude that the "undue hardship" standard in Minn. Stat. § 462.537, subd. 6, is more demanding than the "practical difficulties" standard the court of appeals appears to have relied on in Rowell, 446 N.W.2d at 922. Moreover, with respect to the "practical difficulties" standard, we identified in Stadsvold several factors the county should consider in assessing whether that standard was met: (1) how substantial the variation is in relation to the requirement; (2) the effect the variance would have on government services; (3) whether the variance will effect a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or will be a substantial detriment to neighboring properties; (4) whether the practical difficulty can be alleviated by a feasible method other than a variance; (5) how the practical difficulty occurred, including (Footnote continued from previous page.) prescribed by zoning regulations.' ... An area variance controls `lot restrictions such as area, height, setback, density and parking requirements.' " 754 N.W.2d at 329 (quoting In re Appeal of Kenney, 374 N.W.2d 271, 274 (Minn. 1985)). i i " `Hardship' as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." Minn. Stat. § 394.27, subd. 7. 16 whether the landowner created the need for the variance; and (6) whether, in light of all of the above factors, allowing the variance will serve the interests of justice. 754 N.W.2d at 331 (footnote omitted). Rowelts interpretation of the "undue hardship" standard, requiring only that the proposed use be "reasonable," would render the "undue hardship" standard in section 462.357 less stringent than the "practical difficulties" standard and much less stringent than the "particular hardship" standard in the county variance statute, which the "undue hardship" standard appears to parallel. See Stadsvold, 754 N.W.2d at 331. In short, our analysis in StadSvold simply does not leave room for the Rowell "reasonable manner" standard. 12 12 The City argues that, even if Rowell was based on an erroneous reading of the text of section 462.357, subdivision 6, the standard in Rowe // has been used by municipalities for many years in determining whether to grant a variance. See, e.g., Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park, 643 N.W.2d 623, 631 (Minn. App. 2002); Nolan v. City of Eden Prairie, 610 N.W.2d 697, 701 (Minn. App. 2000); Sagstetter v. City of St. Paul, 529 N.W.2d 488, 492 (Minn. App. 1995). The City suggests that, because the legislature has amended section 462.357 many times since Rowel/ and has not disturbed the court of appeals' interpretation of the "undue hardship" standard, we should treat the legislature as having ratified the Rowell standard. But the legislature has provided that "[w]hen a court of last resort has construed the language of a law, the legislature in subsequent laws on the same subject matter intends the same construction to be placed upon such language." Minn. Stat. § 645.17(4) (2008). The court of appeals is not "a court of last resort." See Anderson- Johanningmeier v. Mid Minnesota Women's Dr., Inc., 673 N.W.2d 270, 276 (Minn. 2002) (stating that the court of appeals is not the court of last resort with respect to statutory construction). Nor does the denial of a petition for review give a court of appeals decision more precedential value than a court of appeals decision from which no review was sought. Murphy v. Milbank Mut. Ins. Co., 388 N.W.2d 732, 739 (Minn. 1986). We therefore reject the City's argument that the legislature has ratified the Rowell standard. 17 We recognize that the standard we apply today, while followed elsewhere, is not the universal rule.13 For example, in Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of Newington, 766 A.2d 713 (N.H. 2001), the New Hampshire Supreme Court provided a thorough and insightful review of the development of land use variance law, and its practical construction in modern times. The New Hampshire statute did not contain a specific definition of "unnecessary hardship," like our statute does, and the court concluded that its prior definition of the statutory term "unnecessary hardship" "ha[d] become too restrictive in light of the constitutional protections by which it must be tempered." Id. at 717. The New Hampshire Supreme Court framed the issue in the following terms: Inevitably and necessarily there is a tension between zoning ordinances and property rights, as courts balance the right of citizens to the enjoyment of 13 While most jurisdictions use the phrase "unnecessary hardship" rather than "undue hardship" as the applicable standard, many jurisdictions appear to require that the variance applicant establish real hardship if the variance is denied rather than simply requiring that the applicant show the reasonableness of the proposed use. See, e.g., Larsen v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Pittsburgh, 672 A.2d 286, 290 -92 (Pa. 1996) (holding that the "mere desire to provide more room for a family member's enjoyment" is insufficient to constitute "unnecessary hardship" under the statute and requiring applicants to show that, if the variance request is denied, the property will be "practically useless "); OK Properties v. Zoning Bd. of Review of Warwick, 601 A.2d 953, 955 (R.I. 1992) ( "The court has determined that unnecessary hardship exists when restricting the property to the permitted uses within the zoning ordinance will deprive the property owner of all beneficial use of the property and that granting a variance becomes necessary to avoid an indirect confiscation of the property. "); Cochran v. Fairfax County Board of Zoning Appeals, 594 S.E.2d 571, 577 (Va. 2004) ( "[T]he [Board of Zoning Appeals] has no authority to grant a variance unless the effect of the zoning ordinance, as applied to the piece of property under consideration, would, in the absence of a variance, interfere with all reasonable beneficial uses of the property, taken as a whole. ") (internal quotation marks omitted); 3 Anderson's Law of Zoning § 20.16 (Kenneth H. Young ed., 4th ed., 1996) (describing different states' approaches to the "unnecessary hardship" standard and suggesting that most states give the term a fairly restrictive construction). IT: l private property with the right of municipalities to restrict property use. In this balancing process, constitutional property rights must be respected and protected from unreasonable zoning restrictions. /d. at 716 -17. In "light of these considerations, the New Hampshire Supreme Court said, that "unnecessary hardship" would, 'in the future, be established when a landowner showed that (1) a zoning restriction as applied interferes with a reasonable use of the property, considering the unique setting of the property in its environment; (2)' no fair and substantial relationship exists between the general purposes of the zoning ordinance and the specific restriction on the property; and (3) the variance would not injure the public or private rights of others. /d. at 717.14 Had the Minnesota Legislature not defined "undue hardship" in Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6, we might consider the approach articulated in Simp/eX.15 A flexible variance standard allows municipalities to make modest adjustments to the detailed application of a regulatory scheme when a zoning ordinance imposes significant burdens on . an individual, and relief can be fashioned without harm to the neighbors, the community, or the overall purposes of the ordinance. See David W. Owens; The Zoning Variance: Reappraisal and Recommendations for Reform of a Much - Maligned Tool, 29 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 279, 317 (2004) ( "If the variance power is to be used both as a These standards were subsequently codified. See N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 674:33 (Sapp. 2009). ' S The factors set forth in Simplex are not dissimilar to the factors we embraced in Stadsvold in construing "practical difficulties." See 754 N.W.2d at 331 (discussing factors for consideration under the "practical difficulties" standard). 19 constitutional safeguard and as a tool for flexibility, zoning enabling acts and local ordinances should be amended to delineate these two purposes and set different standards for each. The failure to make such a distinction underlies much of the past controversy regarding variances. Courts and commentators have traditionally viewed the variances as the former —a very limited tool for avoidance of constitutional infirmity in extraordinary cases. Most variance petitions, and consequently most board of adjustment decision- making, have viewed the variances as the latter —a tool to provide flexible implementation rather than constitutional infirmity. ") We recognize that the ROWOH "reasonable manner" standard represents a longstanding interpretation of the undue hardship standard in Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6, and that Minnesota municipalities have been granting variances under the "reasonable manner" standard for many years. We also recognize that our decision will result in a restriction on a municipality's authority to grant variances as compared with the "reasonable manner" standard. But whatever value we may find in a more flexible standard, particularly with regard to area variances, we cannot ignore the plain language of the statute. See State V. Peck, 773 N.W.2d 768, 773 (Minn. 2009) ( "We have no opportunity to ignore part of the legislature's definition. "). We are unable to interpret the statutory language to mean anything other than what the text clearly says that to obtain a municipal variance, an applicant must establish that "the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls." Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. Therefore, unless and until the legislature. takes action to provide a more flexible variance standard for municipalities, we are constrained by the 20 language of the statute to hold that a municipality does not have the authority to grant a variance unless the applicant can show that her property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. Based on the plain language of the statute, and our precedent interpreting language similar to "undue hardship" in the context of a local government's authority to grant variances, we reject the "reasonable manner" standard from ROwell. We hold that the City inaccurately applied the first factor in the "undue hardship" definition of Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6. Our resolution of this issue makes it unnecessary for us to resolve the other issues Krummenacher raises on appeal. Having concluded that the City applied the law incorrectly, we must address the remedy. In cases where a variance has been denied, the general rule is that "[i]f the zoning authority's decision is arbitrary and capricious, the standard remedy is that the court orders the permit to be issued." Stadsvold, 754 N.W.2d at 332; see also In re Livingood, 594 N.W.2d 889, 895 (Minn. 1999). But there is an exception to this general rule "when the zoning authority's decision is premature and not necessarily arbitrary." StadSvold, 752 N.W.2d at 333 (internal quotation omitted). For example, in Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton, where it was unclear whether the zoning authority had applied the relevant statutory provisions, we remanded to the zoning authority for "renewed consideration" under the appropriate standard. 513 N.W.2d 460, 463 (Minn. 1994). 21 Similarly, in StadSVo /d, we remanded a variance application to the county board because the board applied the wrong standard: The Board, using an "adequate hardship" standard, did not consider practical difficulties. The Stadsvolds argue the Board's decision was therefore arbitrary and capricious. The Board did not have the benefit of our holding in this case regarding "practical difficulties." We cannot tell whether the Board's decision was arbitrary and capricious. Therefore, remand is required to allow the Board to consider the Stadsvolds' variance application in light of our holding that applications for area variances are to be considered using the "practical difficulties" standard in Minn. Stat. § 394.27, subd. 7. StadSVo /d, 754 N.W.2d at 332. Our precedent therefore supports the conclusion that a property owner is entitled to have his or her variance application heard under the correct legal standard, which supports a remand in this case. A remand is particularly appropriate in this case because a property owner seeking to utilize her property should not be penalized due to the City's application of the wrong legal standard. We reverse and remand the matter to the City for renewed consideration of Liebeler's variance request in light of our rejection of the "reasonable manner" standard from Rowell. Reversed and remanded. DIETZEN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 22 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 20, 2010 7:06 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Housh for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 6. 2010, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for July 6, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -01 ADOPTED APPOINTING HEATHER WORTHINGTON, INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Housh adopting Resolution No. 2010 -01 appointing Heather Worthington, Interim Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority.. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Gordon H. Hughes, Executive Director RESOLUTION NO. 201045 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 2009 -2010 BOYS' HOCKEY TEAM City of Edina WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 2009 -2010 Boys' Hockey Team were Classic Lake Champions, Section 2AA Champions and MN State Class AA Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the State Championship Team: John Ankeny Blake Chapman Jon Cote Ryan Cutshall Max Everson Steven Fogarty Connor Girard Jake Heck Tom Holtzman David Jarrett Joey Kopp Cole Kretzman Lou Nanne Ben Ostlie Parker Reno Jake Sampson Michael Sit Brett Stolpestad Charlie Taft Ben Walker Curt Giles, Head Coach Don Beaupre, Assistant Coach Dick Blooston, Assistant Coach Dave Langevin, Assistant Coach Erik Vetsch, Assistant Coach Jason Williams, Assistant Coach BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 2010. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 James B. Hovland, Mayor www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-46 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 2009 -2010 GIRLS' TENNIS TEAM City of Edina WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 2009 -2010 Girls' Tennis Team were Classic Lake Conference Champions, Section 6AA Champions and MN State Champions; and WHEREAS, this is the 13th consecutive year for these Championship titles; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the State Championship Team: Annabel Ansel Lauren Bachmeier Lauren Barden Maddie Boyer Molly Harris Adele Henke Sheri Hickey Caroline Hintz Taylor Johnson Catherine Kerwin Minisha Lohani Morgan Marinovich Katherine Medlar Mollie Meldahl Jane Okerman Elizabeth Templin Meghana Vasireddy Caroline Ward Steve Paulsen, Head Coach Perry Forster, Assistant Coach BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 2010. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 James B. Hovland, Mayor www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 201047 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 2009 -2010 BOYS' SWIMMING AND DIVING TEAM City of Edina WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 2009 -2010 Boys' Swimming and Diving Team were MN State Champions and True Team Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the State Championship Team: Jeffrey Beyerl Will Braun Brian Carpenter Max Cartwright Jimmy Cochrane Fin Delahanty Evan Flack Mike Gratz Chris Greeno Evan Hromada John Jesperson Drew Johnson David Kakalios Robert Larson Danny Lenselink Mitch Lentz Andrew Lindberg Samuel Linden Jacob Loff Sam LoPresti Keenan Madson David Malone Patrick Malone Greg Massey Peter Nash James Neville Sean Nevins Matthew Norris Joey O'Connell Chico Pagitt Evan Pawlyk Andrew Petersen Max Rauchle Buzz Rehnberg Erik Rehnberg Chris Satterthwaite Tim Satterthwaite Arman Shahriar Jack Staunton Joseph Toth Bobby Vinson Kyle Yoerg Art Downey, Head Swimming Coach Scott Johnson, Assistant Coach Rick Jacobson, Diving Coach BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 2010. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 James B. Hovland, Mayor www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 w1N�,r'� -e 0 � eas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL I Agenda Item From: MARTY DOLL Consent COMMUNICATIONS Information COORDINATOR Only Date: AUG 2, 2010 Mgr. Recommends Subject: 2010 IMAGES OF EDINA PHOTO CONTEST RECOMMENDATION: ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Present the 2010 Images of Edina photo contest awards to Diane Schroeder, Connie Greiman, Sonja Ritchie Roy, Cacky Wyatt-Bell, Paul Zdechlik and Dave Dettmann. INFO /BACKGROUND: The City established the Images of Edina photo contest in 2004 to recognize and collect photographs that capture Edina as a preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Each year, residents and employees who work in Edina are called to submit their favorite "Edina" photos taken over the past year The photos are judged on subject matter, composition, clarity, depth of field, lighting, quality of color or black and white, artistry and drama, degree of difficulty, Edina relevance and overall impact Entries for the 2010 contest were due in mid -June. This year, we received 88 photographs submitted by over 4o different photographers This year's panel of volunteer judges included Pat Brink of Brink PR, Jolene Goldade, Communications Manager for Edina Public Schools; and Bret Ryan Art Director for Edina Magazuie. From the 88 entries, they chose winning photographs in five categories representing the City's vision statement: Living, Learning, Raising Families and Doing Business. The Communications & Marketing Staff also choose a "Staff Favorite" photo. The winners of the 2ono Images of Edina Contest are: • "Lake Ripples," by Diane Schroeder, winner of the "Living - People" category. • "Dragonfly," by Connie Greiman, winner of the " Living- Plants/Wildlife" category. • "First Day of Kindergarten," by Sonja Ritchie Roy, winner of the "Learning" category. • "Drinlang Up Summer," by Paul Zdechlik, winner of the "Raising Families" category. • "Taking a Business Call," by Cacky Wyatt -Bell, winner of the "Doing Business" category; • "Joy," by Dave Dettinarin, winner of the "Staff Choice" award. Of the five category winners, one photo was chosen as the overall winner, and will be announced at the Aug. 2 Council meeting. Awards will be presented by Mayor Jun Hovland to all winners. All of the award winners are expected to be in attendance and will pose for a photo with the Mayor. The photos will be framed and hung in the Finance Department at City Hall, along with the winners of the 2009 contest. The photos will also be printed in Edina Magazine, and may also be used in City's publications, such as About Toum. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 20, 2010 7:07 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exception of Items III.E., Award of Bid, Edinborough Park bathroom addition, and IV.I., Resolution No. 2010 -64 authorizing condemnation of land for sidewalk purposes, France Avenue sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -101. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE MARK AWARD PRESENTED Fire Chief Scheerer stated Edina Fire Fighter and Paramedic, Brian Hanrahan, was being recognized because while off -duty, he responded to a pager call in April of 2010. Mr. Hanrahan conducted CPR on a neighbor and following defibrillation by the paramedics, his neighbor responded and survived. Chief Scheerer noted this was not the first time Mr. Hanrahan had responded while off -duty this past year. Adam Weinblatt, Liberty Mutual, presented Brian Hanrahan with the Fire Mark Award, recognizing his efforts that were above and beyond the line of duty. The Council and audience showed their appreciation by responding with a standing ovation. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 6. 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF JULY 6, 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving the minutes of the regular meeting of July 6, 2010, and work session of July 6, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON THE WATERS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL REZONING — RESOLUTION NOS. 2010 -61 AND 2010 -62 ADOPTED — ORDINANCE NO. 8S0 -A -34 GRANTED FIRST READING Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. City Planner Presentation Assistant City Manager Worthington advised that Colonial Church had requested to develop the south parking lot and vacant wooded portion of their site located at 6200 Colonial Way to build a three - story, 139 -unit senior convalescent home for The Waters Senior Living of Edina (The Waters). She presented the majority recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval of the final rezoning and final development plan for a senior assisted living facility proposed by the Colonial Church of Edina /The Waters of Edina, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the staff report dated June 30, 2010. Proponent Presentation Jay Jensen, The Waters Senior Living, 1600 Hopkins Crossroads, Minnetonka, advised of their efforts to significantly redesign the proposed project in response to neighborhood input and indicated they were in agreement with the staff report and all proposed conditions. He presented detailed Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 renderings and a "fly over" that depicted the proposed project. Mr. Jensen advised that the market study results identified a need for 700 units of senior housing and 450 units of memory support housing. He detailed their rationale for choosing this well - located site, how the project would fit into the neighborhood, why people would move to this assisted living facility, and rationale for the number of units proposed. Mr. Jensen stated this zoning only allows senior housing and no variances were being requested. In the future, affordable housing would be addressed. Dan Rectenwald, HGA, 5611 Sherwood Avenue, reviewed his Company's past projects and intention to use architectural details from existing Colonial Church, reduction of the proposed building's scale, and how landscaping screening elements would create an enjoyable ambiance to the project. Ted Yoch, representing Colonial Church, 6224 Braeburn Circle, thanked the Council for its work to make Edina a wonderful community and described the considerations made by the Colonial Committee in determining which senior housing development to pursue. Mr. Yoch requested the Council's support for approval. The Council reviewed approximate distances of senior housing from residences and asked questions of Mr. Jensen and staff. Mr. Rectenwald presented the exterior materials board and indicated it would be compatible with Colonial Church and in context with the neighborhood. Opponent Presentation John Harden, 5829 Jeff Place, representing the Countryside Neighborhood Coalition, presented the reasons the Coalition believed the Planning Commission's recommendation should be set aside. He read a statement from the RFP prepared by Colonial Church, noting it said nothing about a goal to enhance the City or neighborhood. Mr. Harden stated the Countryside neighborhood felt it had been "on trial" and their valid concerns had not been acknowledged. He presented the following points: based on their independent research, there was no proof that seniors would sell their homes to move into the proposed facility; if homes were needed for young families, the City should provide a process to build such homes; the proposed project would create more and dangerous traffic at this southern gateway entrance into the Countryside neighborhood of 2,000 homes; noise would be caused by delivery trucks, buses, medical vans, and ambulances; the transient population would be unstable for a residential neighborhood; the project should be located closer to services; the park dedication fees should not be waived; and the proposed trees would take 20 -30 years to mature and had no leaves seven months of the year. Mr. Harden addressed State statutes and City ordinances that regulate rezoning; stating why Countryside residents did not believe the Water's application met the requirements to consider rezoning. He cited a court ruling that rejected a proposed development based on the finding that residents had relied on zoning, in place for 35 years, when they purchased their homes. In addition, residents believed approval of this application would result in spot zoning, granting a discriminatory benefit, and would not be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, which in their view was revised without a proper public process. The residents believed The Waters was actually rental apartments since it would not be licensed as a nursing convalescence home and as such would not be able to meet those parking requirements of Edina's Code. Jane Paulus, 5048 Logan Avenue S., commented on the importance of strict zoning to attract prospective buyers and neighborhood impact when local churches become metropolitan churches. She believed the decision being made by the Council was precedent setting for all Edina churches and Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 urged the Council to carefully determine how the "dirt" of Edina would be used for its future, noting people were the City's number one resource, but they come and go. Mayor Hovland indicated that one hour of public testimony 'would be entertained and opened the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. Public Testimony Robert Scroggins, 6256 Sandpiper Court, addressed the Council in support. Barbara Griffiths, 5844 Creek Valley Road, addressed the Council in opposition. Mike Lewis, 17496 Frondell Court, Eden Prairie, addressed the Council in support. Christine Henniger, 5816 Jeff Place, addressed the Council in opposition. Dave Andreasen, 5334 Red Fox Lane, addressed the Council in support. Burt Shacter, 5800 Arbor Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition. Stephen Richardson, 7068 Cahill Road, addressed the Council in support. David Murphy, 4701 Annaway Drive, addressed the Council in support. Rosemary Sundin, 5805 Tracy Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition. Bert Ledder, 6709 Cheyenne Trail, addressed the Council in opposition. Douglas Beardsley, 7715 Stonewood Court, addressed the Council in support. Peggy Dodge, 6117 Sherman Circle, addressed the Council in opposition. Ted Springer, 6300 Pheasant Court, addressed the Council in support. Kent Gravelle, 5609 Tracy Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition. Steve Williams, 4717 Aspasia Circle, addressed the Council in support. Susan Clark, 5812 West 61St Street, addressed the Council in opposition. Glen Bruder, 6405 Cherokee Trail, addressed the Council in support. Dr. Lawrence Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, addressed the Council in opposition. Greg Anderson, 4212 Oakdale Avenue, addressed the Council in support. David Henry, 5712 Creek Valley Road, addressed the Council in opposition. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 Carol Rothe, 6105 Arbor Lane, addressed the Council in support. The Council noted the allotted hour to accept public input had been surpassed, but consensus was reached to continue the open discourse. Eileen O'Shaughnessy, 4216 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council in opposition. Nancy Frykman, 6028 Schaefer Road, addressed the Council in support. Joe Lambrecht, 5324 Maddox Lane, addressed the Council in opposition. David Williamson, 7913 Wyoming Court, Bloomington, addressed the Council in support. Tim O'Shaughnessy, 6308 Valley View Road, addressed the Council in opposition. Susan Shulze, 6800 Paiute Drive, addressed the Council in support. John St. Pierre, 6005 Arbor Lane, addressed the Council in opposition. Jerry Potter, 5025 West 60th Street, addressed the Council in support. Jeanne St. Pierre, 6005 Arbor Lane, addressed the Council in opposition and read a letter from Stephen and Jessica Berg, 5828 Olinger Road, in opposition. Ron Randall, 5565 West 70th Street, addressed the Council in support. Mary McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane, addressed the Council in opposition. Eric Hansen, 5212 Glengarry Parkway, addressed the Council in support. Michelle Johnson, 5045 Yvonne Terrace, addressed the Council in opposition. Gene Holderness, 6807 Dovre Drive, addressed the Council in support. Dadi Setiadi, 5841 Jeff Place, addressed the Council in opposition. Bob Shulze, 6800 Paiute Trail, addressed the Council in support. Gayle Gaumer, 5209 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council in opposition. Michael Hime, 5300 Chantrey Road, addressed the Council in support. Kevin McCoy, 5809 Jeff Place, addressed the Council in opposition. James Foster, 4707 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council in support. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place, addressed the Council in opposition. Sharon Allemong, 6328 Falcon Court, addressed the Council in support. Dorothy Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, addressed the Council in opposition. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked questions of staff regarding issues raised during public testimony, including the ability of The Waters to rent to residents under 55 years of age, which would increase the need for parking; and the validity of case law citations used. Attorney Knutson advised that some of the legal cases cited involved other issues, such as a variance request, and noted that in the last 30 years, not one of the City's rezoning decisions had been overturned. With regard to establishing a precedent, Attorney Knutson advised a legal precedent would not be established should this application receive approval. He continued, stating any property owner had the right to request a rezoning. The Council discussed the rezoning request and questioned the State licensing requirement. The proponents explained under Minnesota Statutes 144G, an assisted living building was registered with the Minnesota Department of Health as housing with services, and they had a license for a Class F home care agency to provide home care services to those living within a registered housing building. The Council asked questions of Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle regarding infrastructure availability and he confirmed the existing utility and roadway systems were adequate for the proposed building. The Council also reviewed past discussion related to housing and desired neighborhood amenities. Mr. Hughes stated the final plat was being held until after the rezoning decision was rendered. The request for final plat would then be presented and the proponent may request the City waive park dedication. Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -61, approving a final development plan for the Colonial Church site at 6200 Colonial Way, based upon the following findings: 1. The final development plan is consistent with the High Density Residential guiding of the property. The 139 -unit assisted living facility is high density. 2. The final development plan meets the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. c. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This broad vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure- capacity through wise land use. g. Facilitate the development of new housing and recreation facilities that accommodate the special needs of aging City residents. h. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 3. The final development plan is consistent with the preliminary development plan and contains the City Council imposed conditions. 4. The project approved by the, final development plan will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The property is bounded on the south by Highway 62, on the north by a City park, on the east by the fire station, and on the west by townhomes. The project location provides a reasonable transition between a major arterial roadway, a City park, and an R -1 residential neighborhood. The scale and mass of the project will be of limited impact to the single family neighborhood by virtue of distance. 5. The project approved by the final development plan is consistent with the high density guiding of the property and will not result in an overly intensive land use. 6. The project approved by the final development plan will not result in undue traffic congestion of traffic hazards. The existing roadways will handle the trips generated by the project. Both the RLK and WSB engineering firms determined that the existing roadway system will support the project. The potential traffic impacts are concentrated near a major arterial roadway, Highway 62. 7. The project approved by the final development plan provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open spaces, and natural features. Approvals subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 28, 2010 • Grading plan date stamped May 28, 2010 • Lakescape plan date stamped May 28, 2010 • Building elevations date stamped May 28, 2010 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting 2. Prior to any development, the site must be subdivided and plated as a separate lot. 3. The following must be submitted to the City before a building permit is issued: a. A copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. b. Per Section 850.10 Subd. 3B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. S. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated June 25, 2010. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the Fire Marshal in his memo dated June 15, 2010. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 7. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 8. Implementation of the applicant's Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM), as submitted. 9. Cross - easements must be established over the exterior parking lot of the senior housing project, to allow the church access to those spaces. And Resolution No. 2010 -62, adopting findings of fad for the rezoning of property to Planned Residence District-5, based upon the following findings: 1. The property is currently zoned Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). 2. The property is guided in the City's Comprehensive Plan as High Density Residential. 3. The legal description of the property is set forth on the Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Office of Edina City Hall. 4. The rezoning is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan's high density residential guiding. The rezoning will allow rest homes, convalescent homes, and nursing homes, which are all high density. The current zoning is not consistent with the guiding because it only allows single - family dwellings on 9,000 square foot lots which is low density. 5. The rezoning furthers the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land designated for residential /commercial mixed -use while complementing the character of existing development and promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. b. Seek to accommodate the total projected 1,500 new households projected to locate in the City by the year 2030. c. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina's residents. This board vision of community is a cornerstone to promoting workforce housing that includes a wide range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. Also, this housing vision strengthens and reinvigorates community institutions and makes the City an attractive destination for young families. d. Increase the appeal of Edina's housing stock in order to attract new residents and retain current residents. e. Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. f. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and support the expansion of existing transportation infrastructure- capacity through wise land use. g. Facilitate the development of new housing and recreation facilities that accommodate the special needs of aging City residents. h. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 6. The rezoning is compatible with present and future land uses in the area. The property is bounded on the south by Highway 62, on the north by a City park, on the east by afire station, and on the west by townhomes. The property being rezoned provides a reasonable transition between a major arterial roadway, a City park, and an R -1 residential neighborhood. The scale and mass of development allowed by the rezoning will be of limited impact to the single - family neighborhood by virtue of distance. 7. The proposed housing fits Edina's demographics. According to the 2000 census, 22.7% of Edina's population is age 65 or older. Many of these residents continue to live in single - family Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 homes. The proposed housing development offers an opportunity for these residents to move out of their single - family home and remain in Edina, resulting in an opportunity for a young family to move into the vacated single - family homes. 8. The existing roadways will handle the trips generated by the rezoning. Both the RLK and WSB engineering firms determined that the existing roadway system could support the proposed rezoning. Potential traffic impacts will be concentrated near a major arterial roadway, Highway 62. And First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 -A -34, amending section 850 of the Edina city code rezoning property to Planned Residence District -5. Member Swenson seconded the motion. It was noted that when the Comprehensive Plan Amendment was granted, all five members had supported the initial vote because the Council felt this was an appropriate location for the use. Their concern had been with the proposed project's mass, not the location. After that meeting, one Council member had reconsidered her position. Member Bennett stated she had continued to study the issue, had epiphanies, and determined the issue was about the Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and size. She indicated she would like to be more thoughtful and develop a principle that would include intergenerational living, and this was not that model. Member Brindle felt this type of facility was needed and noted that rezoning would be required no matter where it was placed. However, she preferred a location where such a project would thrive, closer to amenities, with a bustling first floor, and senior housing above. Members in support noted the site was well located with complementary assets and a significant distance from traditional neighbors. It was noted that a walkable location, such as at 44th and France, was not available and the City needed to look at Edina as a whole, to assure future sustainability by meeting the needs of a changing community. Members in support indicated analysis had not found any impact to property values or the neighborhood as a result of this type of project, and Edina had to provide housing options for all of its citizens, including its high number of seniors per capita. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Bennett, Brindle Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — SOIL RETENTION TIE -BACK SYSTEM FOR BRAEMAR WEST ARENA BLEACHERS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for soil retention tie -back system for Braemar West Arena bleachers to the recommended low bidder, Atlas Foundation Company at $46,930.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — TRACK LOADER — EDINA PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for track loader, Edina Park Maintenance Department, to the recommended low bidder, St. Joseph Equipment, Inc. at $27,184.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 *AWARD OF BID — INDOOR SWEEPER FOR PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for indoor sweeper for Public Works Facility to the recommended low bidder, Tennant Sales & Service Company at $36,604.14. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — WEST 44T" STREET MILL AND OVERLAY— BROOKSIDE AVENUE TO BROOKSIDE TERRACE, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -379 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for West 44th Street mill and overlay, Brookside Avenue to Brookside Terrace, Improvement No. BA -379 to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, Inc. at $40,977.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. AWARD OF BID — EDINBOROUGH PARK BATHROOM ADDITION Mr. Hughes noted this item was removed from the consent agenda because it was over budget. He noted last year, the first bids were over budget, and the project was redesigned. However, the second bids were only lower by $2,500. Edinborough Park Manager Kattreh advised there was currently only one restroom at this facility, located on the other side of the park, causing difficulties and complaints from patrons. Ms. Kattreh reported an additional restroom nearer to the play structure was the number one request of customers at Edinborough. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, awarding the bid for Edinborough Park bathroom addition to the recommended low bidder, Jan Lasserud Construction at $96,250.00. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -11 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Mr. Hughes stated the ordinance would increase student appointments from the current one member per commission, some of whom were voting members; to two non- voting members per commission. The Council agreed the language should be revised so the number of adult members on commissions would not be decreased. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2010 -11, amending the City Code concerning appointment of students to boards, commissions and committees, and directing staff to revise language so adult membership would not be decreased. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -59 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING FACSIMILE SIGNATURES Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -59, authorizing use of facsimile signatures by public officials. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -60 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -60, authorizing investment agreement. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 *SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -08 APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to approve the publication of the summary of Ordinance No. 2010 -08, amending section 850 of the Edina City Code adding a building height overlay district. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -58 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -58 accepting various donations. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *EHS HOCKEY ALUMNI DONATION TO BRAEMAR WEST ARENA ACCEPTED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to accept the Edina High School hockey alumni's donation to purchase and install a tribute to former Edina High School hockey coach Willard Ikola at Braemar West arena upper level corridor. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. STUDENT MEMBERS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES APPOINTED The Council thanked Members Bennett and Brindle for their work to make these recommendations. It was noted that 25 applications were received and 23 were interviewed, not all from Edina High School. The recommendation would place seniors and those with strong demonstrated interest in the area of appointment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, ratifying student appointments to one year terms, beginning September of 2010, as follows: Art Center Board: Maria DePesa (senior) and Thea Zerbe (junior); Energy & Environment Commission: Karwehn Kata (senior) and Alma Pronove (junior); Community Health Committee: John Beuerlein (senior) and Francesca Sifferlin (BSM senior); Heritage Preservation Board: Katherine McLellan (senior) and Lauren Thorson (senior); Human Rights & Relations Commission: Zack Antar (senior) and Daria Brosius (senior); Park Board: Austin Dummer (senior) and Felix Pronove (senior); Planning Commission: Tara Mohtadi (sophomore) and Matt Rock (junior); and, Transportation Commission: Sarah Engebretson (senior) and Bodhe Scheerer (senior). Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF JULY 7, 2010 ACCEPTED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh to accept the Traffic Safety Report of July 7, 2010, as submitted. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -64 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF LAND FOR SIDEWALK PURPOSES — FRANCE AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -101 The Council discussed the project and asked questions of Mr. Houle. Attorney Knutson advised that the issue of the fence and required variance would be discussed at the August 2, 2010, meeting. Mr. Houle stated that staff intends to continue negotiations in an effort to reach a settlement, but this resolution would authorize condemnation. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. Page 10 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 2010 -64, authorizing condemnation of land for public purposes. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PARK CENTRUM RENAMED "HUGHES PAVILION" Mayor Hovland explained the Council determined it would like to honor Gordon Hughes for his service to the community and to rename Park Centrum to "Hughes Pavilion." It was noted that precedent existed for this action in the naming of "Warren C. Hyde Clubhouse" in honor of Edina's first City Manager and "Rosland Park" after the retirement of City Manager Ken Rosland in 1998. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving the renaming of Park Centrum at Centennial Lakes Park to "Hughes Pavilion" in honor of retiring City Manager Gordon L. Hughes. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Hughes stated this was as an honor and deeply appreciated. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Housh approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 8, 2010, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $155,394.45; Communications Fund $1,272.47; Working Capital Fund $14,138.99; Equipment Replacement Fund $140.01; Art Center Fund $3,043.49; Golf Dome Fund $1,201.28; Aquatic Center Fund $13,384.05; Golf Course Fund $32,349.66; Ice Arena Fund $24,708.08; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $26,501.48; Liquor Fund $245,470.43; Utility Fund $27,942.73; Storm Sewer Fund $266.71; PSTF Agency Fund $16,347.45; TOTAL $562,161.28 and for approval of payment of claims dated July 15, 2010, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $101,283.68; Communications Fund $4,729.90; Police Special Revenue $6,250.00; Working Capital Fund $135,256.67; Equipment Replacement Fund $1,178.00; Art Center Fund $7,442.10; Golf Dome Fund $32.03; Aquatic Center Fund $7,153.01; Golf Course Fund $23,303.37; Ice Arena Fund $133,144.90; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $3,829.30; Liquor Fund $165,027.81; Utility Fund $405,752.10; Storm Sewer Fund $47,106.84; Recycling Fund $37,683.00; PSTF Agency Fund $1,766.95; TOTAL $1,080,939.66; and, Credit Card Transactions dated May 26, 2010 — June 25, 2010; TOTAL $8,249.17. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. GORDON HUGHES ACKNOWLEDGED The Council members recognized this was Mr. Hughes' last meeting as the City's Manger and stated their thanks for his outstanding service. The Council and staff gave Mr. Hughes a standing ovation. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:09 a.m. July 21, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Page 11 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 20, 2010 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 2, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the July 20, 2010, meeting available. Page 12 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 20, 2010 4:30 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present: Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor called the meeting to order, and a telephone call was placed to Harry Brull, the City's consultant for the City Manager search, at PDI Ninth House. There was a discussion based on results of the interviews held by City Staff, Department Heads and the citizen panel. and FesideRtS ^a n +.e +ive .ef the busiRess eemmwRity. Four candidates were selected to continue on in the search process for a new city manager. The next step is the interview done by a panel of metro area City Managers to be held on July 22, 2010. The discussion continued, focusing on the next events and when they would take place. • July 23 - Results of City Manager Panel transmitted to the City Council • August 2 - Selection of three candidates for testing with PDI. t^^ei _r#s. Determine the format for City Council interviews of finalists. • Two -week assessment of the three candidates finalists by PDI with the results to the City Council on August 13. • August 17 — City Council will meet to determine which candidates to invite to be finalists. The Council will determine questions and make any other final preparations for the City Council interviews of the finalists. final p ati.+ s for the Pity G9 .-il WP-PAP&N .,f the finalists_ • August 24 — Interviews will be conducted by the City Council members of the candidates. There will be a short orientation starting at 4:30 p.m. . Interviews of the finalists will be at 5:00 p.m., 6:15 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. Interviews will be held in the City Council Chambers and the public is invited to observe the interviews. The fiFSt eandldate will -staFt be i Ftcrviewed at q ;Q() p.m the S.P_r_-9_Ad iRteFview will be iRteFvie_v.;e_d_ at 645 p.m., and if there is a thiFd final Gaf;didate, that peFsen 'll h + d at :7.]n I + will h^ hPld it the Ge eil GhambeFs r The call with Harry Brull ended. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 2, 2010. Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manger James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 20, 2010 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; John Keprios, Park Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Public Works Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose of the meeting was to begin work on the City's preliminary 2011 Operating Budget. Manager Hughes said the Council needed to review and give direction on the following items: Budget Calendar Staff reviewed the proposed calendar for the City's adoption of its 2011 Operating Budget. The Council must adopt its maximum levy at their September 7, 2010, meeting. Staff explained this would not be the detailed budget, but a preliminary budget. Then between September and December when the final budget must be adopted, the detailed budget would be prepared for review. The Capital Improvement Plan would be reviewed. It was pointed out that no utility rate study was planned for this year. Staff will discuss the conservation rate with the rate study consultant. Enterprise Budgets The Council discussed the type of enterprise fund budgets that would be prepared. Staff explained that the Council has reviewed business plans; budgets have been prepared, and a sample presented to the Council. These budgets have been made available to the public upon request. Staff will prepare the enterprise fund budget per the sample presented and these budgets would be reviewed later in the fall before the final adoption. Dispatch Services Request From Golden Valley Staff explained Golden Valley had issued a request for proposals for dispatching service. The City of Edina has expressed interest in responding to the RFP. The Council will discuss this possibility in more detail at their August 2, 2010, work session. Issues to consider included technical ability, capacity, and budge. Utility Franchise Fees Manager Hughes explained that he had put the utility company on notice that the City may be considering a franchise fee ordinance. It was suggested that a review of a possible franchise ordinance be started at the second meeting in August. Mayor Hovland closed the meeting at 6:00 p.m. to allow discussion of labor negotiations. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 2, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL J U LY 20, 2010 6:05 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Also attending was Cy Smythe, Labor Relations Associates, consultant. Mayor called the meeting to order and stated the purpose of the meeting was to discuss pending labor negotiations with the City's labor unions. The City Council received information from Mr. Smythe and City staff regarding the status of negotiations with the City's labor unions. The City Council gave direction to staff regarding the ongoing negotiations. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 2, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 'o-vile REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: 11. A. From: Wayne Houle, PE Lj�s ® Action Public Works Director/ Discussion City Engineer Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing — Sidewalk Construction Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement No. S -106 Resolution No. 2010 -65 ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2010 -65 accepting the feasibility study and approving Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Improvement, Improvement No. S -106, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The project was initiated by a petition accepted on September 8, 2009 by the City Council. The proposed project includes a 5 foot concrete sidewalk to be constructed on the side of Interlachen Boulevard between Bedford Avenue and William Avenue. The Feasibility Study was received at the July 6, 2010 City Council meeting. The public hearing notice and list of labels are included in this report. The Engineering Department has received additional correspondence and a petition against the installation of the sidewalk, since the Feasibility Study was received. The estimated project cost is $85,000. Municipal State Aid funds are proposed to be used to fund the project. Staff has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. GAEngineering\Improvements \S106 Interlachen Blvd fr Bedford to Williams Ave (Petitioned)MESIGNTEASIBILITY (incl. all pre design) \PUBLIC HEARINGS\20100802_RR_S106.doc ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -65 Resident Correspondence and July 27, 2010 Petition Public Hearing Notice Mail Notification Area Map G: \Engineering \Improvements \S106 Interlachen Blvd fr Bedford to Williams Ave (Petitioned) \DESIGN \FEASIBILITY (incl. all pre design)\PUBLIC HEARINGS\20100802 RR_S106.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2010-65 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION FOR: INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD FROM BEDFORD AVENUE TO WILLIAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT NO. S -106 City of Edina WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 6t' day of July, 2010, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed sidewalk construction, Improvement No. S -106; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed noticed and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of August, 2010, for Improvement No. S -106 constructing sidewalk along Interlachen Boulevard from Bedford Avenue to William Avenue at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. S -106 constructing sidewalk along Interlachen Boulevard from Bedford Avenue to William Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. S -106 constructing sidewalk along Interlachen Boulevard from Bedford Avenue to William Avenue is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of the improvement to be completed during the 2011 construction season. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the feasibility report for Improvement No. S -106 is hereby received by the Edina City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Adopted this 2nd day of August, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 2, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 JOSEPH J. CHRISTENSENt* ROBERT P. LAUE MICHAEL W PLAMBECK CHARLES A. DELBRIDGE CHRISTENSEN & LAUE, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 400 5101 VERNON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55436 TELEPHONE (952) 927 -8855 FACSDIH.E (952) 927 -5427 July 7, 2010 VIA E -MAIL isullivan@ci.edina.mn.us Mr. Jack D. Sullivan City of Edina. City Hall 4801 West 50' Street. Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Re: Proposed Sidewalk 5313 Interlachen Boulevard Dear Jack: WALTER C. GusTAFsoN OF CouNsEL (1981-2004) tREAL PROPERTY LAW SPEcmun CMrnF :D BY MINNESOTA STATE BAS AssocmnON "Also AnNnTrm IIY WlscoNsDr As you know, our firm represents Sandra Strom, the owner of the property located at 5313 Interlachen Boulevard. This letter follows our telephone conversation and e-mail correspondence related to Ms. Strom's concerns with the proposed sidewalk encumbering her property. I have had the opportunity to review the documents you forwarded to me by e -mail on July 6 and have the following comments and concerns: Right -of -Way. As we previously discussed, the plat of Rowland's Addition does not indicate a right -of -way in favor of the city along Interlachen Boulevard. Please provide me with documentation demonstrating the city's right -of -way, including dimensions. 2. Width of Right- of -Way. The city's feasibility report indicates that the sidewalk would be constructed wholly within the city's right -of -way and would include a five (5) foot wide boulevard and a five (5) foot wide sidewalk. This presumes a ten (10) foot wide right -of -way onto Ms. Strom's property as indicated above, a survey showing the right -of -way would alleviate some concerns. 3. Maintenance of Sidewalk. The report indicates that Edina Public Works Department will maintain the sidewalk and be responsible for snow removal. However, we have concerns that if the City does not timely Mr. Jack D. Sullivan July 7, 2010 Page 2 maintain the sidewalk or remove the snow in a timely fashion, if an accident were to occur, the victim in any such accident would not look to the City alone, but to the property owner for damages. In order to resolve this concern, it appears that an indemnification agreement whereby the city agrees to indemnify Ms. Strom and hold her harmless from and against any damages related to the city's failure to maintain the sidewalk and timely remove the snow, including attorney's fees, would be appropriate. 4. Damage to Property. It is my understanding that installation of the sidewalk will require the removal of certain landscaping items on Ms. Strom's property including, without limitation, bushes which Ms. Strom purchased within the last year or two. Ms. Strom should be compensated for the loss of these items. Additionally, the City should provide, in writing that it will repair Ms. Strom's property if it is damaged as a result of the City's maintenance of the sidewalk. We look forward to you response. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CHRISTENSEN & LAUE, P.A. "IN11 Michael W. Plambeck Attorney at Law MWP /mw cc: Ms. Sandy Strom Mr. Jim Wilson Jack Sullivan From: Michael Plambeck <mwp @edinalaw.com> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 3:34 PM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Sandra Strom Sidewalk Issue Jack: I understand there is a public hearing on Monday regarding the sidewalk issue. I am renewing my request for the staff report for Monday's hearing, as well as the drawings /survey of the proposed sidewalk (including, without limitation, documentation showing the City's right -of -way). I am willing to meet with you at City Hall to discuss this if you are not able to e-mail this information to me. Thank you, Mike Michael W. Plambeck Attorney at Law Christensen & Laue, P.A. 5101 Vernon Avenue South Suite 400 Edina , MN 55436 Telephone: (952) 927 -8855 Facsimile: (952) 927 -5427 Toll Free: (800) 958 -8855 The information contained in and accompanying this e -mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e -mail in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at (952) 927 -8855. Jack Sullivan From: Jack Sullivan Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 9:41 AM To: Michael Plambeck Subject: RE: Sandra Strom Sidewalk Issue Mr. Plambeck, I will send you a follow up email in a few minutes responding to this request and your previous 4 questions. Regards, Jack Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer City of Edina Direct: 952.826.0445 fax: 952.826.0389 jsullivan(@,ci.edina.mn.us From: Michael Plambeck [mailto:mwp @edinalaw.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 3:34 PM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Sandra Strom Sidewalk Issue Jack: I understand there is a public hearing on Monday regarding the sidewalk issue. I am renewing my request for the staff report for Monday's hearing, as well as the drawings /survey of the proposed sidewalk (including, without limitation, documentation showing the City's right -of -way). I am willing to meet with you at City Hall to discuss this if you are not able to e-mail this information to me. Thank you, Mike Michael W. Plambeck Attorney at Law Christensen & Laue, P.A. 5101 Vernon Avenue South Suite 400 Edina , MN 55436 Telephone: (952) 927 -8855 Facsimile: (952) 927 -5427 Toll Free: (800) 958 -8855 The information contained in and accompanying this e -mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the 1 Jack Sullivan Subject: 5313 Interlachen Boulevard Attachments: Sullivan 7- 7- 10.pdf; 5313_ Interlachen _Survey.pdf; Brookside Heights _1 of2.pdf; Brookside Heights_2of2.pdf; Parcel Sketch.pdf Mr. Plambeck, You contacted the City via email regarding 4 comments and concerns, per the attached file titled Sullivan 7- 7- 10.pdf. The following is my response to those four topics. 1. Right of Way: I have included the original plat (Brookside Heights, 2 pages), the lot reconfiguration (Rowland's Addition) and the lot survey on file at the City building department(5313 Interlachen Survey). In addition, I have included as parcel sketch (parcel sketch.pdf) that illustrates the relationship between the platted right of way and 5313 Interlachen Blvd. With all this supporting documentation, we are constructing the sidewalk within the public right of way. 2. Width of right of way: The right of way is 33 feet. Refer to answer #1 for more information. 3. The City will maintain the sidewalk. The City has not agreed or entered into any indemnity agreements on any other public sidewalk within the City. The City would not enter into any agreement for this parcel. 4. The sidewalk construction is expected to impact landscaping and fencing located within the City right of way. All of our construction can be done within the City owned right of way. The City will relocate the decorative fence and bushes to the right of way line as part of our project. In addition, the staff report (you already have the feasibility report) will be available after lunch today. I'll email the link to the Council Agenda at that time. Please contact me with any additional questions. Regards, Jack Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer City of Edina Direct: 952.826.0445 fax: 952.826.0389 jsul ivanP,ci.edina.mn.us INTERLACHEN BLVD a SECTION LINE r a r' r Conch Q ROW LINE r, — I— 4— 4 r o_ �:v .- O I 5313 53 5 5000 I �; '- - -t� n " iu Aar w ROWLANDS ADDI HENNEP /N COUNTY, MINNESOTA ONN E. CAROARLLLE SU.PVEYOR mn � /it, MiNwrib /NTERLA CHEN BOULEVARD ro j Q V QQ 60 ALLEY � I ON KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE ROBERT L. ROWLAND A/VO BARBARA C fOWL AND. /I /S FE, OWNERS AND PROP,P /ETORS,AND T//E TW IN C/TY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIAT /ON, A PPORATION ORGAN /ZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF TlIE UN /TED STATES OF AMER /CA, MORTGAGEE THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA, WIT' LOT FOUR 14/ ANO LOT F /VE /S/ BLOCR THREE /3/ B.POOA'S /OE HEIGHTS AS OF RFeo^9 /N THE OFF /CE THE REGISTER OF Ors", NENNEPIN COUNTY, M/NNfSOTA. NAVE CAUSED 7NE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PLATTED AS ROWLANDS ADD /T /ON ANO SUBJECT TO tE U7IL/TY EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED PLAT /N WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR NANOS AMD 4F,-IXEO OUR SEALS, AND THE TWIN C/TY OERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOC /AT /ON HAS CAUSED THESE PRESENTS TO BE S /GNED BY /TS PROPER T/CERS AND /TS CO.PPpRATE SEAL TO BE NE.PEUNTO AFF /XED TN /S .d .S .. OAY OF .. /956, AD N ..A.0. IM, RESPECT /YEL Y. AO IN PRESENCE OF: S /GNED: dal ... THE TWIN C/TY FEDER SA{' /7N0. LOAN ASSOe -.4 V posy is "Y ✓ .. .. ... ... ... ................ ... ... .... .._ ..... ' .. ASS /STANT SECRETARY STATE OF MINNESOTA] COUNT Y , .2 TN /S . �. d... DAY OF .. � A.O. /9SS BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBL /C, /T.H /N AND FOR SA /O COUNTY ANO STATE• PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT L. RONLAN.0 ,d V9 BARBARA C. Q WLANO, // /S W/FE, TO ME PERSONALLY KNOWN TO BE TI/E PERSONS OESCR /BED IN ANO WNO EXECUTED I� n 2 b •� �b.:J `y ALLEY � I ON KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE ROBERT L. ROWLAND A/VO BARBARA C fOWL AND. /I /S FE, OWNERS AND PROP,P /ETORS,AND T//E TW IN C/TY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIAT /ON, A PPORATION ORGAN /ZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF TlIE UN /TED STATES OF AMER /CA, MORTGAGEE THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA, WIT' LOT FOUR 14/ ANO LOT F /VE /S/ BLOCR THREE /3/ B.POOA'S /OE HEIGHTS AS OF RFeo^9 /N THE OFF /CE THE REGISTER OF Ors", NENNEPIN COUNTY, M/NNfSOTA. NAVE CAUSED 7NE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PLATTED AS ROWLANDS ADD /T /ON ANO SUBJECT TO tE U7IL/TY EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED PLAT /N WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR NANOS AMD 4F,-IXEO OUR SEALS, AND THE TWIN C/TY OERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOC /AT /ON HAS CAUSED THESE PRESENTS TO BE S /GNED BY /TS PROPER T/CERS AND /TS CO.PPpRATE SEAL TO BE NE.PEUNTO AFF /XED TN /S .d .S .. OAY OF .. /956, AD N ..A.0. IM, RESPECT /YEL Y. AO `%v' T IF FOREOOINO INSTRUMENT AND ACRNOWLEOGEO THAT THEY EXECUTED .THE SAME AS THEIR OkKV lPEE A T ANO OEEO. _ !///�> Lp Oenrr:s /Pan n.wvuwe.r: NOTARY AWL le, MEN EP�TY, M/NNESO TA SEPTEMBER /956 MY COMMISS /ON EXP /RES uw ua°,ys.T,ti�,,,a:•;.'.'`,'. "�.:, 574TE OFMINNFSOTA (SS u. ..�,,: <; . 1a:J. i::ia: COUNTYOFHENNEP /N / ON 711ISY.' -.'PAY 0,1,AZ.!• ,,, A.O. 19SS BEFOREIMF, ANOTARY PUBL /C, Pl' THIN AND FOR SAND COUNTY ANO STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED N.M. MUHNL EY ANO .4 W/NOSOR WHO E CN BEING DULY SWORN C/O SAY TWAT THEY ARE RESPECT -1XFLY THE ASSISTAN7 SECRETARIES OF E TW /N C/TY FEDERAL SWINGS AND LOAN ASSOC/A T /ON, A CORPORAT /ON 0AM4NIZE0 ANO EXISTING UNOER rA F SAWS OE THE UN /TED STATES OF AMERICA, ;r//S COR,-O eAT /ON NAMEO /N THE FOREGO /NG INSTRUMENT AND T i SEAL AFF /XED TO THE SA ID INSTRUMENT /S THE CORPORg7 SEAL OF SAID CORPORATION, ANO THAT SAID / SMOMENT WAS S /GNED ANO SEALED INBEMALF OF S,4 1,9 CORPORATION BY AUTHORITY OF lTt BDARO OF D fECMRS, AND SA /D NM IMIINLEY 44V A. WINDSOR AC,YNCWL EOGEO SA /D INSTRUMENT TO B THE FREE ACT A D DEED OF SA /O CORPORATION NOTARY PUBL /!, HENNEP /N COUNTY, M/AWESOA'�• �b'0°p1 C0i memo- MY COMM /SS /ON EXP /RES .. • ............. . / HEREBY CERTIFY HAT IHAVE SUPYEYEO AND PLATTED TW£ PROPERTY DESCR /BED ON TW /S PLAT AS ROWLANDY A00 17101Y, TWAT THIS PLAT /S A CORRE 7 REPRESENTAT /ON OF SA /O SURVEY; THAT ALL 0/STANCES ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAT !N FEET AND DEC /MACS OFA O7; THAT MONUMENTS FOR•GUIOANCE OF FUTURE SURVEYS NAVE BEEN CORRECTLY PLACEO IN THE GROUND AS SHOWN ON THE PLA ; THAT THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY LINES ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAT,• ANO THAT THERE AAIS NO WET LANDS OR N/GWWAYS TO BE DES /GNATEO ON SAID PLAT OTHER TNgN As Shv;vN HEREON SURVEYaP STATE OFM/NNESOTA S S Jl joiCaii7Ti`M" S6A%;fiyt',vo. SEE COUNTY OE NENNEP/N ABOVE CERTFF/CATE SUBSCRIBED ANO SWORN M BEFO.PE 'ME THIS .?! f,. PAY NO ARY PU999999LL1L///LL !!!!!! ENNEP/ O 'M /N . . TN /S PLAT WAS CAM EO AND iOPPROYED TN /S 28JhDAY OFykvfc /r<DLcti"pAG /- 9f[n'd1�q MY CONM JJ /ovE P/plJ .f /P( L.j..... yPWPl6h HENNEP /N La/Ny J �PrE�R / V TN /S PLAT WAS RECD MFNOEO FOR APPROYAL BY THE e,EA/ N //,VG COMMISSION OF THE Y/LLAGE OF ED /NA, MINNESOTA, AT A REGULAR MEE71N6 7 EREOF, MELD T111S.X14-;.DAY 0,1..C::.�.. -:4'C .` ^.,. AA /9SG PLANNING COMM/SS/O A, TW /S PLAT WAS AP ROYEO 9N0 ACCEPTED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL Of SOMA, MINNESOTA, AT A aUL iLJEE7 /NG TMEREOA HELD TW /S .7.i3LOAY OF. �.�= {•!'•........ A.O /9S6 IULLAG�j�UNC/ /NA,MNNESOTA ......!` /iLN?�t. .. YILLA5EM4N4SER r:. d J IN PRESENCE OF: S /GNED: THE TWIN C/TY FEDER SA{' /7N0. LOAN ASSOe -.4 V 4 .. .z. ASS ISTANT SECRETARY "Y ✓ .. .. ... ... ... ................ ... ... .... .._ ..... ' .. ASS /STANT SECRETARY STATE OF MINNESOTA] COUNT Y , OF HENNEP /N J ON TN /S . �. d... DAY OF .. � A.O. /9SS BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBL /C, /T.H /N AND FOR SA /O COUNTY ANO STATE• PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT L. RONLAN.0 ,d V9 BARBARA C. Q WLANO, // /S W/FE, TO ME PERSONALLY KNOWN TO BE TI/E PERSONS OESCR /BED IN ANO WNO EXECUTED `%v' T IF FOREOOINO INSTRUMENT AND ACRNOWLEOGEO THAT THEY EXECUTED .THE SAME AS THEIR OkKV lPEE A T ANO OEEO. _ !///�> Lp Oenrr:s /Pan n.wvuwe.r: NOTARY AWL le, MEN EP�TY, M/NNESO TA SEPTEMBER /956 MY COMMISS /ON EXP /RES uw ua°,ys.T,ti�,,,a:•;.'.'`,'. "�.:, 574TE OFMINNFSOTA (SS u. ..�,,: <; . 1a:J. i::ia: COUNTYOFHENNEP /N / ON 711ISY.' -.'PAY 0,1,AZ.!• ,,, A.O. 19SS BEFOREIMF, ANOTARY PUBL /C, Pl' THIN AND FOR SAND COUNTY ANO STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED N.M. MUHNL EY ANO .4 W/NOSOR WHO E CN BEING DULY SWORN C/O SAY TWAT THEY ARE RESPECT -1XFLY THE ASSISTAN7 SECRETARIES OF E TW /N C/TY FEDERAL SWINGS AND LOAN ASSOC/A T /ON, A CORPORAT /ON 0AM4NIZE0 ANO EXISTING UNOER rA F SAWS OE THE UN /TED STATES OF AMERICA, ;r//S COR,-O eAT /ON NAMEO /N THE FOREGO /NG INSTRUMENT AND T i SEAL AFF /XED TO THE SA ID INSTRUMENT /S THE CORPORg7 SEAL OF SAID CORPORATION, ANO THAT SAID / SMOMENT WAS S /GNED ANO SEALED INBEMALF OF S,4 1,9 CORPORATION BY AUTHORITY OF lTt BDARO OF D fECMRS, AND SA /D NM IMIINLEY 44V A. WINDSOR AC,YNCWL EOGEO SA /D INSTRUMENT TO B THE FREE ACT A D DEED OF SA /O CORPORATION NOTARY PUBL /!, HENNEP /N COUNTY, M/AWESOA'�• �b'0°p1 C0i memo- MY COMM /SS /ON EXP /RES .. • ............. . / HEREBY CERTIFY HAT IHAVE SUPYEYEO AND PLATTED TW£ PROPERTY DESCR /BED ON TW /S PLAT AS ROWLANDY A00 17101Y, TWAT THIS PLAT /S A CORRE 7 REPRESENTAT /ON OF SA /O SURVEY; THAT ALL 0/STANCES ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAT !N FEET AND DEC /MACS OFA O7; THAT MONUMENTS FOR•GUIOANCE OF FUTURE SURVEYS NAVE BEEN CORRECTLY PLACEO IN THE GROUND AS SHOWN ON THE PLA ; THAT THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY LINES ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAT,• ANO THAT THERE AAIS NO WET LANDS OR N/GWWAYS TO BE DES /GNATEO ON SAID PLAT OTHER TNgN As Shv;vN HEREON SURVEYaP STATE OFM/NNESOTA S S Jl joiCaii7Ti`M" S6A%;fiyt',vo. SEE COUNTY OE NENNEP/N ABOVE CERTFF/CATE SUBSCRIBED ANO SWORN M BEFO.PE 'ME THIS .?! f,. PAY NO ARY PU999999LL1L///LL !!!!!! ENNEP/ O 'M /N . . TN /S PLAT WAS CAM EO AND iOPPROYED TN /S 28JhDAY OFykvfc /r<DLcti"pAG /- 9f[n'd1�q MY CONM JJ /ovE P/plJ .f /P( L.j..... yPWPl6h HENNEP /N La/Ny J �PrE�R / V TN /S PLAT WAS RECD MFNOEO FOR APPROYAL BY THE e,EA/ N //,VG COMMISSION OF THE Y/LLAGE OF ED /NA, MINNESOTA, AT A REGULAR MEE71N6 7 EREOF, MELD T111S.X14-;.DAY 0,1..C::.�.. -:4'C .` ^.,. AA /9SG PLANNING COMM/SS/O A, TW /S PLAT WAS AP ROYEO 9N0 ACCEPTED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL Of SOMA, MINNESOTA, AT A aUL iLJEE7 /NG TMEREOA HELD TW /S .7.i3LOAY OF. �.�= {•!'•........ A.O /9S6 IULLAG�j�UNC/ /NA,MNNESOTA ......!` /iLN?�t. .. YILLA5EM4N4SER r:. d J 6TRIAL C. E. COULTER e LAND SURVEYOR (jY LOT6 GRAPHIC MAPPING REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 3300 LYNDALE AVE. SO. MINNEAPOLIS a. MINN. TAYLOR 4 -0370 �'iunean.c'a (�Prtitit�fP ,�; L c I�1 ileor i., za,�" r 9 •9 3G p I n PLATfINO FARM SURVEYS LAKESHORE JUDICIAL N `JCQI'° :1" - 2O fro' '• i nI L %. I hereby certify that the above is a true. and correct plat of a survey of Lot One (1), Block One (1), RGWI,AMI S ADDI1.'ICv, Hennepin County, E.innesota. As surveyed by me this 9th day of September 195b A. D. 3i-ned Vinnesota Registration rho. 25.64 1 I t I C J p1.7J Go V, v,isrry e;7 we .. ha — 4 lY�l�ytg6� ann<!sd a7 t. Ir.,•�i t�.nr v.rty>.ie6..11�r.Jr.rsrrJ_n < __ __ �_ _ ee_trrlr<.rlrinNOeJ /�ti WON.mN7aria /N TERLACh/EN Bout EYAR 0 � 6o a rJ 'a a d' re arJSr a a J+ ta w 1 4 f4 i !t � d\ n/ r , oac A s T t� ( A,,, ! A", S` 4 3 2 15 4 d 2 u' a,ePoa st .s rnrr . l . pr: • '�c"N'•." 't l � y / /s ;f,• nr.aa ii '' /era, JJt,/ Ce „.h grl. C.r»., la,: On eA.: 26–dy� Ao rJ• w Z3 w B W w L3 !9* B y 4 9 Y /4 zh,.s N. Iara.l1. 4 /re.90 P /alts �' /rr90 arAn.vlyd7•d rA,t xe •> —e.,r eA, rae.., r+ xu Q v Q 4 4 ljSA o .f 4 y, 6 J . V � /J {J N 9 Q � 8 /Ja o /o SIB ST Gid l7 ff:17" L6 Z4 O /, I.N• /2 g71 /l .7l /F Af• 2 `i4 21 Z� J,os 4� nn°s Jse°J O .,..t J,r.I v. Ja<l /Jap \. o /7.• s a S o o•• 20 0 o S 4 ` Ln Y y S y � °y 20 y ,°• 9 y �� z /, 'rre./ - '.h '� �' ' / � aM Q�'� J // J.li. /1 � JJw /.// •p J9 rl J d9./3i.3 /Js.3' 0 /9 /r, a/ /A! 4/ • 4+ / • 0 ?0 d N B o e /7 0,• g a • 17 e�o 8 e• m /7 / O.se M y' J7e.et i� 4 /Je.J, ti r J! e ti /r.Jt Ja6e /J•.rr b P/ • '• 9 0 /& o! � :9 � y, . /6 • � 9 ti y /L. y . ti 9 � /JZJs ytRt a/o y /J" /io,Zf /J,Ja /3 •'/P J 079 /� 7Q / e.7a Nr.X (23 C y /30.91 4 /30.lJ M � 7w J - .fa81 Ji l /3r. N OJ" O ,Z4 e y. ' o /,► o /2 a o /3 M /a y.. M •+v GO JJe.r 60 ° r 60 ,a •r s ri 60 o xs rn_ .1jat0 ,f,rRRNStp r lf,. C,rn1y J / /Pn Pri J On thr:x+f p•w•na77y eypea,vd Ot.1 fL!<ro.n,v. "d•mrr, t exJtnrmrnf and Je ash•ner. /rd7r8 lire hr <r<r Slak eJ J�9 +'nnr!•t i S5+ C vn ty �f/tnnepeit 1 On th,i ,t* day °/•' y<r+.,.allq n ypm red C! r<nrr E. H 77, 1. m• , cnJqu m•nt awd A• orhn.e7edysa tha7 dr sr Q. tr yMrnn /ee4. { St: N Gnnty �Hsnnrpin J On tA6.2 4 d-- p<Jwna77y ayp•a red f. „4.rpA• /v. eA -E d Ab.; and wA. etaruled tae /.rr7sin7 in+rra narnl a SFat, •/ M.itur +.ta t SJ; C,+tnty� / /rnhrpiw J z Arrray rrta(y rh, BROO,YS /DE f-/.,MS'/TS';eAa/ r. Jk,vm nrt ZA, 77ae ,b pre and drrdma7r .> PLred ,'n tAr gr•.rnd a+ rA..em °.. eAa pla e. err,p. ray �rtA. z nd e. ee.rret7y sA.�m •.r pl t OtArr lion ar >A.wa thrrron. The abrr, csrt�r'e, tr s•ar ,w3tar4bea and !•Ye array <ar Cs%y thae eA. aar°a p7et year v U 7r y Ear;.a ata. �i.6ur -�•% T�Pd[Dlid 1mvo o, TASEE eo JUL 1913 tyr,w, AL P, MM US, Audit, � S / /J .1jat0 ,f,rRRNStp r lf,. C,rn1y J / /Pn Pri J On thr:x+f p•w•na77y eypea,vd Ot.1 fL!<ro.n,v. "d•mrr, t exJtnrmrnf and Je ash•ner. /rd7r8 lire hr <r<r Slak eJ J�9 +'nnr!•t i S5+ C vn ty �f/tnnepeit 1 On th,i ,t* day °/•' y<r+.,.allq n ypm red C! r<nrr E. H 77, 1. m• , cnJqu m•nt awd A• orhn.e7edysa tha7 dr sr Q. tr yMrnn /ee4. { St: N Gnnty �Hsnnrpin J On tA6.2 4 d-- p<Jwna77y ayp•a red f. „4.rpA• /v. eA -E d Ab.; and wA. etaruled tae /.rr7sin7 in+rra narnl a SFat, •/ M.itur +.ta t SJ; C,+tnty� / /rnhrpiw J z Arrray rrta(y rh, BROO,YS /DE f-/.,MS'/TS';eAa/ r. Jk,vm nrt ZA, 77ae ,b pre and drrdma7r .> PLred ,'n tAr gr•.rnd a+ rA..em °.. eAa pla e. err,p. ray �rtA. z nd e. ee.rret7y sA.�m •.r pl t OtArr lion ar >A.wa thrrron. The abrr, csrt�r'e, tr s•ar ,w3tar4bea and !•Ye array <ar Cs%y thae eA. aar°a p7et year v U 7r y Ear;.a ata. �i.6ur -�•% T�Pd[Dlid 1mvo o, TASEE eo JUL 1913 tyr,w, AL P, MM US, Audit, � . A x"dr.'aA 2328 +� � 87fl5Q7 i 3 9 b { r 1 f I I I lr 1 I`C 7 9�b S R00KSIOE HEIC•�°ITS A,IN- 1�y °�° � ' .r ri1lr.au.ruea.GSLtAa.e,�e. HEN NEPIN COUNTY MINN :wp ........a.awmu..r . xa malfm•.aJflarp.a„J f4lrrykh'l1:amN.r.,ar :r,x +r.._.rr.nrr.ar: na/DutAh. .,r.i..r..nnJf6.,. N f.S/" ...............A.W/3.a%.. wnrr. r ax d6.. AN rA °.dwNrjY � +8qm: •f•'i,G w.lt'• l••:wP a : � irry .:m.a :. er. Ja /t N• a,.b and C xi% K •x 6 , rr / .t,. er wn <a at Ot/ . uA.wdrrr qP! 'f{ .n I �y q,lx i •.,: '.�y�. hArelL- �.m_yP3 ��� 4HO�tfa mo4Jn ONN.,rl,Ran)r&'.& .c 01/N: ,inr rc , +rx LPe ..... EJI ,.,•pr cr)%bi c, B/,hOKS /DE NE /6NT5• • - '^c^• -•. ,(f+�( ana ur xcrtir .4x.n .nJ nJ:md• 4 tit yulh: us /..+.r, .A fJ• Jt A „R.. rhq! ,nr s..lr...d ., ,r,•,w .. N. ”' "'txy rnxxed V. ,r Z.— vi.»y xr L» 1 x .4 mr u. Anxdr e4 PV7d ,, A- - _. � p w x. • •! d, L ll�rL4:cJ,v a A nx.�G•• r -_ -- -- _ _�•/a ns.a..k,nc+�m.rrmasaR• -- --- — - - - -- '••••••x•� .wY:.w.r rr... :IS,r,( 'lktrasa _ /NTERLACNEN BCWL EVARLf w R 7[,� L ..r ��- 6 E /4[, fa N 6o N F JI as ar+• Ge r ! f. J1 •'^ bo JJ h Jd fJ lf.N ° cJ " � A.l rN /•` y 1 it •••rq.•x abe_Juw. a ♦ / ZE 4 4 2° / Zf 4: a0` t / a Araa JaayM:w.... 1 J ,,f w � .a � �a a•.er di�L/ .+ ! G.why4Gaa.)er OalA•:- rl-d.JY'�,N ,•g» • 6•• • D/ • • ♦ •tam Z r• • {a •j M'7r:— N.Ja.r,r,v. %.•x, r. w, p »•.Jry Jxr LN/re ya,w lxx:W: •..d wJ.»»yl j.»r.,y .:•Mw,wl ,. A Ir ter/ n r r e „r +! a,rn.r1J /r aet ie arxxad rL a. w••+. iu .ww�ewr.wd n°!. /y/ r�DNA °� 1 • / ♦ rc {♦ ',J { { q n I ` vas I I IE Tsi 1 1 �. 9 , d Q sr • Z ? rr , Z // ; rtH ; C /• i I W 51a • t , A z I ♦ Z 2r ♦ ; 2 u p 9 rr•rr I GO ` Y CA I-S- ------"------ wrrrr- -a o { ♦ ST• to s• i /•J n rte. /7 rS /6 /J N kiiJ , a ti d AYN ' 7J qtr ; r9a Q V nr.J i s �T H M [Y N >u b r~� /s tA! to al tl ra JGG �Na:nx•G 1!x '.eriiil C +.Jy fin• y,i, •• O HdN/dq y�a'r•,tanJLpr+mr.a.r.r/6a4: ..•r..: awaJ,.+... crwtgwn ,ry�� ym.rrlq .rl ° ^d JlxI.QO,Nn.v'r. , r, .Jm.,..rry darn 'L Ja rJ. yxa.w d•w:D.r .:. nwd w e...wAd. �16Jt�na.rwa sauyN.:aa•.a l ar. �Y _:.r.�r C xryYM•n P.: 1 q,� On di, xµ QrJp•- +tA/11I,7• %,. nRn N.G.P /aDA: r,'lA,w,tIJ,. +°ri C•rary nn.r�_ /rar.../Iy npye. tad er nlNa'/ /,L n. pan . ra //J An.rr r..'J, fL y,wx• eur a5. n.d wL r,..rM ra•FitYr�y�P44 wn.wmr and J• xAw.rNJJaz rA.r Ae eye•r!M tre a+w.• .• i.: wx /.x ��� .•�4 { "• 3. + � ' ,bj e._ w• a.. er),Fe t7{ Jrg /a�ri. .. �.f C.r nfj yAnray:n \ >�n on pww•lJ9 ay)m,al A:,,4w>•rl d •/n N' ir�m,a ,Aa if� MgMK b�•.� rp,LV,pm,w Jy lw..•. a4Ur yew.. �,:+ildiq.� axe aA, enrufl eL f..ry+:,) ia,nxmad and a,, .alw•r/earad eAat tAry rr��rr��rraR. �'A- +..r� �..p r�a.�+......��!•¢j%(js!�( N.P9. a�Nw.sy, f ryiA. C.x ( N 9Y f•Pw J • 0,!.v 4� tae »79 n/q wrr A•.• ,r.sryra.wa rn4Nar fL y »)xg s.,n: Jar. u,: �l.r . $BOONS /DE rd :. A.. rr r.:°rr...r•.rr�..,nnn:,. q••. + +..aq•rJ.r.fr d:•n..,,n ».::».try• A.wn an trr )P•t au ; ;a,r dx:+..4 A: te r, w..r w,wnJ>. -.l +.m,•y /.b» •••,+r• a••- J.w. ar..xrh pL»d .: rL q ana ! . a. yon /A f a. ^i..e•.a lh » e .a.Rd• dN,j.afr .wN )4t, eAnr LPt /N.le rrr y/L Z.. /NNeAe pw n J eA.e Lbn n• wN /«, J•dla: A •q, e;{la..yn.ry- .,.�•w �� t •� e rA.r IN. .. wwn tx... �. R+.'J. ».y :s+r .nd r °•rn Lay» n.r L>a tr•m.rde>'•"'•RO ?�t )' v: +- A/p t•x mitre r�,iw OO'rx //- /�� �71'�/ ra Ax,Jq nul�/q 4.0 rA. dI,» rl e y 6ROOKS 1OE yN•✓'ll qa e/Edann xta >�L//�✓ mrAiV !Axed ]fd Urr >9Ad /Ap!/tq�j_a'�,✓� ,;. ,. 'rn iutl Pxoca \nA w�•n Y,l(�r � •rd,� '.��` TD]11Cr>�JlTI�11� {r�A ""OIX��YYC WMUIY 1 RL r Jr • • 'f RJ>alAl�02 Axgra nMW I o 5 I City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: oy e ` + «� CITY COUNCIL t }° 48(ll. West 501" Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -3861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD UEAL PETITION TO TrHE CITY COUNCIL e v ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUT':I'ER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURI+ACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER TO the Mriyor and City Council: ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER:_&O ..... S T bx;WAL:{ The Pei-Solis who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements Jistcd above to the locations listed below. tN`-1'ERLACHEN...._. BLVD. ......... ---- .-- betwcen.BEDFORD AVE. and LOCATION Or INIPROVEiNIENT BY STREIET NAME ADDRESS LOCATION OF INIPROVL NIENT BY STREET NANiE LOCATION O1 111PROVI. \iliNl' B1' STRE'ET N,-1ME LOCH HON OI' IMPROVEN'IENI W STREET NANIE ADDRESS WILLIAM;- AVE ADDRESS ADMESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: TINE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE .IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM TILE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL, AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGN THE 1 ' r r� OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) SANDRA K. STROM /3 G,,� c'A a V, 'f'h' petilon \'as r 1-culated b PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 5313 :INTER;LACHEN BLVD. __ _553.1_.3— T- UTERLA 'n. EDTn1A ---- g_52_-21 6 — 8 4 1G NAME ADDRESS PHONE Therc is space foi— moi-c signatures oil the back. APRIL 2008 PROPIR`I'Y OWNE'R'S OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) This titi n va'. clrculat'd b NDRA K_ . STROM WILSON NAME PROITRTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 5313 INTERLACHEN BLVD. EDINA ADDRESS 952 -926 —_8416 PHONE The Mimiesom Dula Practices Act requires that we inform twit of your rights above the priiatle data we al-e requeslbtg on thus form. Under the laut your telephone number is private data. This pelition when submitted gill became public information. Thera is no consequence for reJicsing to supple this informalion. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 LOGISMap Output Page PAIY 5340 5348 5344 5340 4545 4544 a a 4548 x� 5324 5304 5300 6 14CV LYWOM RD 5311 5309 5305 5301 5317 4816 5017 5319 5324 5320 5316 5312 5332 5328 Page 1 of 1 4545 4g4q 4545 454a 48�7H 51 W' } 5238 5234 5232 E224 6220 5216 4801 4 5241 52 :j:'� OF0,5ea �4e 4817 � 4621 5230 5224 5220 40 5236 4824 WTERLACHENBLVD 5313 5343 5000 :J5333 5319 5321 ;5501200 50 5005 5012 5013 5012 5013 5016 5013 5016 5017 5016 24 ? a 5020 5021 5020 K 5021 5020 333 5024 5024 5025 5024 5028 5029 5028 m 5028 5029 5032 5033 5032 5032 5036 5037 5036 5037 5036 5040 5040 5041 5040 5045 5044 5045 5044 5044 5113 5155T ST W 5100 5101 5100 5101 5100 5104 5104 5108 5109 5108 5109 5108 M� aaYaa v.cti ams • C�Tt4n ICl coci3Gts 2005 5237 5233 5225 5221 5013 5012 5017 5016 5021 5025 5024 5029 5028 5033 5032 5037 5036 6040 5041 5224 5701 5705 5109 5215 15211 5013 5017 v 5021 5025 2 5029 5033 5037 SO4J 5045 5049 SfOQ 5105 5100 5108 zsui 5010 5100 J y h a esi�C�aJ St � V cZi� s4 5 5 w� 1 I< - ec �v �. a7/ ao�0 l �xd:L: -I h hft„• / /rric lnrria nrrr/T 0('JQ Arr•TA/TQ /imc7QarviraNama =art T.C)CUR Pn 0V0sT)F.9rCIiPntV 7 /,?9 / ?oln July 22, 2010 REVISED DATE FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. S -106 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD FROM BEDFORD AVENUE TO WILLIAM AVENUE A letter sent to you dated July 16, 2010 had incorrectly stated the public hearing date. The correct information is as follows: The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 2, 2010, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing for the Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk from Bedford Avenue to William Avenue. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2010. The cost of the project will be funded by State Aid Gas Tax Funds and therefore, you will not be assessed for this proiect. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties within the project area. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. 4520 4517 4516 ,4517 4520 4517 516 _ 4 4520 -4521 4520 4521 E 4521 4524 4525 4524 14521 4528 4525 4524 ¢ 4525 4533 4532 4529 4528 6 4536 d53fi 4533 4532 3 4529 4532 4529 4537 W 4537 4536 $ 4537 4540 4541 4540 4540 4544 4'`45 4544 4545 :5,4'.41 4 4545 4537 4544 24 d548 5324 5304 5300 5238 523 32 5224 5220 5216 4801 5209 5205 5201 5332 ,...._..,_.� ,-.-'� --�- RD 4805 4808 HOLLYWOOD j \ 4809 5340 !f 5371 5241 5237.'S233j 5229 5221 5217 4812 4810 5 I 5309 5 305 5301 I i I! I 4813 ,` 7 5317 4817 4816 d8 fT 4816 _.. ' ,., �' �I 4821 4825 5348 5319. '`' �I 4821 4820 5400 ;_ - - -- 5230 5224 - 5210 5404 ( 5321.'53201 5314 5340 5332 5325 531G. 5312 } 5240 5236 4824 4828 4832 4836 4840 bVTEfZ ACHEN BLY0 .. I ------------ 5313 21 4900 5415,24 5403 5401 5343 5000 50015333 5329 5321 30511, 5237 5233 255221 5215 5' 1152 _ I I 5005 Ve '5002 5405 I 5012 �5013�(` 5012 5013 5012 5013 sm "5013. 5200 5016 1 5013 II 5016 -� ( { - -5017 5016 1 501 "1 224 5020 . 1 5020 g ( 5021. _ � 5020 � 'C 1__ 5021 5016 � I 5021 X10 24 5021 C r 5017 5024 5024 5015 5024 `-1 1 5025 5024 (_5025 5000 5029 - p� I - 029 5028 Se 5028 of 5028 -Iy 5029 -1-5028- - `1 5029 a rn 5029 I 5033 5032 I 5033 JO3 5033 5032 ....... 5037 5017 5036 � 5037 [1032 SOJ6 SOJ7� SD36 5040 1 5040 5041 I5037 5040- 5041 5100 5013 5044 504 5044 i 5D45' 5041 =5224 5045 5113 51ST ST W J 5049 5100 5101 5100 5101 5100 5101 5100 5105 5017 5104 5104 5105 5104 24 5108 5109 5108 5108 5108 5109 5108 5112 5117 5112 5113 5109 5112 5113 5112 5116 5121 5116 5117 5116 5117 h h 5116 5117 5120 5121 5120 5121 5121 5120 Y o� 5125 5124 5115 5124 5125 5128 5124 5129 5128 5129 5128 SiT9 o A� 5125 5120 24 5132 5133 132 5137 5132 24 5136 5137 5176 5137 5117 5140 24 5140 5141 5140 5148 aax U. d-r A,.MS•CWp4l {CI LCGIS G.S 7005 S141 i 36511 MAIL NOTIFICATION AREA MAP L REPORURECOM MEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: II. B. From: Wayne Houle, PE Y. � :F50�— ® Action Public Works Director/ Discussion City Engineer 0 Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing – Sidewalk Construction Normandale Road and Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement No. S -104 Resolution No. 2010 -66 ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project Council shall adopt Resolution No. approving Normandale Road and Improvement No. S -104, authorize plE taken. to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, 2010 -66 accepting the feasibility study and Valley View Road Sidewalk Improvement, ns and specifications to be completed and bids INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff initiated this project at the request of Council. The proposed project includes a 5 foot concrete sidewalk to be constructed on the east of Normandale Road and along the north side of Valley View Road from Benton Avenue south to Concord Avenue. The Feasibility Study was received at the July 6, 2010 City Council meeting. The public hearing notice and mailing area are included in this report. The Engineering Department has not received any additional correspondence since the Feasibility Study was received. The estimated project cost is $200,000. Municipal State Aid funds are proposed to be used to fund the project. Staff has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. G:\Engineering \Improvements \S104 W Rd fr Concord to Normandale to BentoMDESIGNTEASIBILITY (All Pre - Designs) \PUBLIC HEARINGS\20100802 RR S104.doc ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -66 Public Hearing Notice Mail Notification Area Map G:\Engineering \Improvements \S104 W Rd fr Concord to Normandale to Benton\DESIGNTEASIBILITY (All Pre- Designs)\PUBLIC HEARINGS\20100802_RR_S 104.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -66 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION FOR: NORMANDALE ROAD AND VALLEY VIEW ROAD FROM BENTON AVENUE TO CONCORD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT NO.�S -104 City of Edina WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 6t' day of July, 2010, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed sidewalk construction, Improvement No. S -104; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed noticed and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of August, 2010, for Improvement No. S -104 constructing sidewalk along Normandale Road and Valley View Road from Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, . does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. S -104 constructing sidewalk along Normandale Road and Valley View Road from Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. S -104 constructing sidewalk along Normandale Road and Valley View Road from Benton Avenue to Concord Avenue is hereby ordered as proposed with construction of the improvement to be completed during the 2011 construction season. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the feasibility report for Improvement No. S -104 is hereby received by the Edina City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. Attest: Adopted this 2nd day of August, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 2, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 July 22, 2010 REVISED DATE FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT- PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. S -104 VALLEY VIEW ROAD FROM CONCORD AVENUE TO NORMANDALE ROAD AND BENTON AVENUE A letter sent to you dated July 16, 2010 had incorrectly stated the public hearing date. The correct information is as follows: The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 2, 2010, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing for the Valley View Road Sidewalk from Concord Avenue to Normandale Road and Benton Avenue. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the. summer of 2010. The cost of the project will be funded by State Aid Gas Tax Funds and therefore, you will not be assessed for this uroiect. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties within the project area. The City Council can authorize . the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. 5900 5904 5908 �4 m s 4 m 0 = z m Y2 i 0 BENTON AVE 5901 q 5905 ¢ C �__ 5901-5900 590115900 5901 50-�,S -5901 - -- 5905 5904 5905 +5904 5905 5909 4813 4$09 4801 5909 5908 5909 5908 590 4810 5913 5912 5913 5913 , 5917 5916 5917 5917 5913 5004 7 04 480 4732 5921 5920 5921 5920 �� e$4805 087 "� �_ -- 5925 5924 5925 �� -- 5928 5929 5929 5929 4816 `,.4� 48f�480fij 12147!7 4709 47r 05.5932 5933 5928 5933 Y4 5933 490024 t4816 ggi2 4804 4800 4724` 6 4712 47-0 +4 5�0 5937 5936 5941 5941 5944 5945 5940 1 i X4720 i. 4708) 5945 594„ 11829 5 4817;4813 4801 4714709 4705 4101 0001 D000 6001 6000 6001 P�/� ////4809 6004 i 6005 6004 6005 gpOq 6005 " °18 ^4810%% 6tl08 6005 60041 6005 6004 600/8 6008` 16009 6008 6009 6008 6009 812, 4808 6009 5009 1 6013`6012 4804 4800 6012 �1— 6012 6013 60 7 6012 60- `" 4724 6013, 1 6017 L 4835 4833 '� 4720 6016 6016 6016 5 4829 4825 `` 716 >}�47,12 470 6021 i t 6021 }SO o° L 4831 (4809 4801 4� r 4700 1.6020 � 6020 qY 4704• 4628 6025 6 4624; °'� -6104 47214717 11 1 46201" 4616 4612 602d 61091" �6f05 4713 4705 , - / 46046028 6108 6119 6112 ¢ 6104 d701 4629' 4608 ( f 6109 _ _ 4712 6100 6031 12 6108 4708 A- ( 4625 l 6101 6116 611761131 L 1 4700 6105 b /04 6100 ° 6120 6121 6116 �6 17 6111 4704 ` �61 6105 1109 6108 F112461 ?Sr6124 0. 612 6116 4709.` 6169 L61 4 6128— 6119 1)6128 6125 6120 6121 4701 6ydy 6112 6113 8 6116 6f17 6112 4816 4812 4808 4804 6129'472'0 6124 6125 4704 6145 16120 6121 6116 �J 4800 l l 1 1 6140 o ` c ll i 5701 5801 5800 58015800 5801 5800 5805 5804- 5805-5804 5805-5804 5809 5808 5809 5808 5809-5808 5812 5813 5812 5813-5812 5817-5816 5817 5816 5817.5816 5821 5820 5821 5820 5821 5820 5825 5824 5825 5824 5825-5824 5829 5828 5828 5829-5828 5833 5832 5833-5832 5833-5832 n 5837 5835 5837-5836 5837-5836 58491 5900 5841 5840 5841-5840 5841-5840 5844 5845 5844 5845-5844 5013 T- ;016 50 6100 u 104 62016200 620! 6 0 6201 6200 Z21461'74613 4605 621 z W16.. 9 f X620 6209 6208 1 6209 6208 .6209'6208 626 ?09 6208 6204 620 6217 6216 62 n 6216 6217 6216 2 f 6213�%rl� 6225 6224 M 6225 6224 6225 6224 6217 6217 66209 - r? . 6205 �OyByf 6232 6233 6232 6233 6232 46241452) 6221 6201 n 6225 6304 'rya f%�Y 761 13016300 6301 6300 6301 6300 6301 630, t(C)LOC.YSGtS AlS yd? 6305 MAIL NOTIFICATION AREA MAP 1 580f,5800 5801 5805 5804 & 5805 5809 5808 5809 5813 to 5813 5817 5812 > 5817 X 5821 5820 h5821 ¢ 5825 < 5825 5829 5828 m 15� 5833 5832 k 5837-583 6 5833– 5841 5840 5837– 5845 5844 5841 – 5845– 5901"5900 5901 5905 5904 5905 5909 5908- 15909 5913 5912 15913 5917 5916 15917 5921 5920 15921 5925 5924 5925 59295928 5929 5933 5931 5933 5937 5936 5937 5940 '5941 5945 5944 5945 6001 6000 6001 6005 6004 6005 6009 6009 6008 6017 60'13 6012 !6021 6025 6017 6016 6029 6020 6033 6021 6037 4j 6025 6041 A 6045 )7A � 7 t 5�,^ vl O REPORT/RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.C. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® ❑ 11 Action Discussion Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Amendment to Final Cypress Equities Development Plan — Resolution No. 2010 -67 ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution approving an Amendment to a Final Development Plan for Cypress Equities at 7311 France Avenue. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Planninq Commission Recommendation: On June 30, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of an amendment to the final development plan to allow outside amplification. Vote 4 Ayes; 3 Nays (See attached minutes.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On July 28, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed revision to the building elevation to include additional sliding glass doors /panels; noting that the changes to the building elevation meet all zoning ordinance requirements and meet the acceptable building materials requirement established in the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant withdrew the request for an outdoor fireplace. Vote 8 Ayes; 0 Nays (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance 2010 -67. • Withdraw letter of wood - burning fireplace. • Planning Commission Minutes. • Planning Commission Staff Reports. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -67 OVfNC AN AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 7311 FRANCE AVENUE FOR CYPRESS EOUFFIIES City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Amendment to the Final Development Plan requested by Cypress Equities for 7311 France Avenue based upon the plans submitted June 24, 2010, with the exception of the fire place, is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval is subject to the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2) The sound study done by David Braslau Associates, Inc,, concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. Approval of the Amendment to the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Building must be developed per the building elevations date stamped June 24, 2010; with the exception of the outdoor fire place, which was requested for removal from the plan by the applicant. 2) Outdoor amplification is allowed for building C provided that decibel levels may not exceed State noise standards or be audible to residents on their property on the east side of Centennial Lake. If amplified sound exceeds State noise standards or is audible to residents on their property on the east side of Centennial Lake on two or more occasions within a 90 -day rolling period and the incidents are independently confirmed by a police officer or other City employee, subsequent outdoor amplification will be prohibited. 3) From the source of the speaker, the maximum sound level may be 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck; and 60 dBA from the upper deck, to meet state law regarding noise at the adjacent residential lot line. 4) A "Loudspeaker" permit must be obtained from the City of Edina, and meet all applicable conditions of the permit, including that the loudspeakers must be turned off at 10:00 pm. 5) All other conditions required in Resolution 2007 -63 would continue to be in effect, unless otherwise stated above. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 ww\v. c it),ofed i na. com 952 - 927 -8881 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -67 Page Two Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 2, 2010. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUN'T'Y OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 2, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2010. City Clerk Jackie Hoogenakkelr From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:42 AM Ter: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Pinstripes - - - -- Original Message---- - From: dale [ mailto:dalel @att.blackberry.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:47 AM To: Gordon Hughes; Jim Hovland Cc: Mike Fischer; Heather Worthington; Cary Teague; Kirk Williams; Steve Kiehn Subject: Re: Pinstripes Gordon, As requested, at this time Pinstripes will not proceed with a wood- burning fireplace on the second floor, and as such the elevations will be adjusted to eliminate the minor "chimney" earlier shown in elevation. We will evaluate gas burning fireplaces as an alternative, and if I can find a beautiful gas option (that does not burn natural firewood), then we will consider such a gas fireplace for the first and /or second floor, and in such case there will be no elevation issues and we will submit our specific plans to Steve Kiehn and his team as part of our current building permit submission process. Thank you all for your continued support throughout this process, and we look forward to beginning construction in early August and opening before Thanksgiving so that we can all enjoy Pinstripes together and have fun! Dale - - - - -- Original Message----- - From: Gordon Hughes To: Jim Hovland To: Dale black Cc: Mike Fischer Cc: Heather Worthington Cc: Cary Teague Sent: Jul 28, 2010 10:20 AM Subject: RE: Pinstripes Thank you mayor. It would be preferable if Mr. Schwartz would send Cary and me a brief e -mail as soon as possible which summarizes their plan change. We would then forward this to the Planning Commission and Mr. Bohan et.al. as soon as received. (By copy of this e -mail, I'm advising Mr. Schwartz of this request.) From: James Hovland [ mailto :jhovland @krausehovland.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:05 AM To: Gordon Hughes 1 L l Cc: Mike Fischer; Heather Worthington Subject: Pinstripes Gordon, I had a couple of phone conversations with Dale Schwartz yesterday relative to wood burning versus gas fireplaces at the Pinstripes location. After giving it some thought, Dale called me last night to let me know he will convert his request from wood burning to gas for the outdoor fireplaces at Pinstripes. You may want to let John Bohan know that in advance of the Planning Commission meeting this evening. Dale also thought we should notify the neighborhood prior to this evening if possible. I think by notifying John, there is a good chance he can notify much of the neighborhood. Call if you have any further questions. James B. Hovland Krause & Hovland, Chtd. 31D Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612- 874 -8550 612- 874 -9362 (fax) Sent via BlackBerry - a service from AT&T Wireless. z DRAFT MINUTES PC MEETING OF DULY 25s 2 010 ll. NEW BUSINESS: 2010.0005 Amendment to the Final Development Plan to allow a glass partition and fireplace Cypress Equities 7311 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported to the Commission that at this time Pinstripes has indicated they will not proceed with a wood - burning fireplace on the second floor. Teague explained that Pinstripes will evaluate gas burning fireplaces as an alternative sometime in the future; reiterating that at this time the wood - burning fireplace and chimney have been removed from the elevations and are not part of the discussion this evening. Planner Teague delivered a power point presentation highlighting the elevations of the building. Appearing for the Applicant Dale Schwartz, Pinstripes Discussion Commissioner Scherer asked Planner Teague if the sound studies included noise. that would be generated from inside the building. Planner Teague responded that he believed so. He noted past photo's indicated that the sound speakers generating noise were located at the building wall. Decibel levels were also taken at different levels. Chair Fischer said the focus this evening (because of Pinstripes withdrawing the fireplace) is now only on the sliding glass doors. Chair Fischer acknowledged that the majority of the correspondence received by the Commission pertained to amplification and the fireplace. Fischer said in his opinion its best if the Commission doesn't comment on minor design changes and leaves that review in the hands of City staff, adding if the applicant returns with a gas fireplace he would trust staff to review and approve or deny the fireplace and not have the Commission also review it. Fischer said of course the Commission would want to weigh in on changes to building height, etc. but not design detail changes that meet ordinance requirements. Commissioner Schroeder agreed and questioned if the Commission even has the authority to deny the applicants request for sliding glass doors when the doors meet ordinance and building code standards. Planner Teague explained to the Commission that the City Council has established a policy that when a project is approved the project is approved by City Council subject to the plans presented, and there are changes are made to the plans or building elevations, even minor, those changes are brought back before the Council. The Council then makes a determination if the changes rise to-the level of needing additional review by the Planning Commission and additional public hearing. Teague said in this instance the Council decided to refer the changes in the buildings elevation to the Commission for comment. Teague acknowledged this is the first time since the policy has been established that the Commission has been asked to review changes to a building's facade. Applicant Presentation Mr. Schwartz addressed the Commission and explained that at this time Pinstripes has made the decision to eliminate the wood - burning fireplace, adding that because of the elimination of the fireplace there will be no chimney; the purpose of the chimney (depicted on the plan) was to funnel smoke. No smoke, no chimney. Continuing, Schwartz said that he wasn't ruling out adding a gas fireplace sometime in the future, adding if he finds something.very distinctive one may be added. Concluding Schwartz said if a gas fireplace was added in would be low like the gas burning unit at Tavern on France. Public Comment Sylvia Jesse, 6612 Logan Ave, Richfield, thanked the applicant for eliminating the fireplace, adding because of her disabilities the wood - burning fireplace (if constructed) would have been harmful to her health. Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Forrest acknowledged that Commissioners received comments from residents on the sounds, fireplace and glass panel issue. Motion Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend approval of the revision to the building elevation to include sliding glass doors /panels noting the changes to the building elevation meet all zoning ordinance requirements and meet the acceptable building materials requirement established in the Uniform Building Code. Commissioner GPabie8 seconded the motion, All voted ayes motion Carried. Chair Fischer thanked the applicant for listening to the neighbors about their concern with the wood- burning fireplace. �, MEETING MINUTES o E) �, Regular fleeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, June 30, 20105 7°00 P.M. �o Edina City Hall Councils Chambers o �o MEMBERS PRESENT. Chair Alike Fischer, Michael Schroeder, Jeff Carpenter, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, Steve Brown, Arlene Forrest and Karwehn Kata MEMBERS ABSENT Floyd Grablel STAFF PRESENT. Cary Teague and ,hackie Hoogenakker 1. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the May 26, 2010, Planning Commission meeting were filed with a correction. Chair Fischer addressed the Commission and public and briefly explained the function of the Planning Commission. Fischer said Commissioners are neighbors and volunteers, appointed by the Mayor and Council for a 3 -year term with a term limit of 9- years. Continuing, Fischer said the Commission has two roles; legislative and quasi - judicial and briefly explained the role the Commission plays with each. II. - NEW BUSINESS 2010.0005 Amendment to the Final Development Plan Cypress Equities 7311 France Avenue South, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant is requesting an amendment to the approved Final Development Plan to accomplish the following: Revise the approved renderings of Building C (the restaurant component). The revisions include adding sliding glass panels /doors to the outdoor patio area, a new metal panel, and a fire place on the upper balcony. The stone on the fire place would match the existing stone on the building. Remove a condition from the original approval that did not allow outdoor amplication for restaurants. The intent of the request is to provide background music for customers in the outside dining areas. In 2007, the City Council approved construction a 31,000 square foot single level retail building along France Avenue, a 22,000 square foot retail building with a 5 level parking ramp above, and a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. Total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. Planner Teague asked the Commission to recall that they recommended denial of the Final Development Plan. Continuing,. Teague explained that the restaurant building has sat vacant since its construction. A restaurant called Pinstripes would now like to occupy the space. Pinstripes would have outdoor dining on the patio and second story balcony. These uses are permitted within the MDD -6 Zoning District. Teague noted that concern was raised the last time this project was reviewed, and during the pre - development, developer neighborhood meeting regarding the outdoor eating areas. As a result, the applicant had previously agreed to the condition of approval regarding noise; therefore, no amplification or outside speakers was allowed for the development. However, the restaurant that would now like to go into this space wishes to have outside amplification of music, therefore, the applicant is requesting that that condition be eliminated from the approved plan. Concluding, Teague recommended that the city council approve the amendment to the final development plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities based on the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2) The sound study done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. Approval of the final development plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Building must be developed per the building elevations date stamped June 24, 2010. 2) Outdoor amplification is allowed for building C. Decibel levels may not exceed the state noise regulations. 3) A "Loudspeaker" permit must be obtained from the City of Edina, and meet all applicable conditions of the permit, including that the loudspeakers must be turned off at 10:00 pm. 2 4) All other conditions required in Resolution 20.07 -63 would continue to be in effect, unless otherwise stated above. Appearina for the Applicant Kirk Williams, Cypress Equities, Dale Schwartz, Pinstripes and David Braslau A.ppi ant Presentation Mr. Williams addressed the Commission and explained Cypress has entered into a long term lease with Pinstripes, a high quality and entertainment restaurant. Pinstripes is very interested in opening and operating its business in a manner that is satisfactory to the community's interest as well as alleviating any concerns regarding noise issues in the neighborhood. Continuing, Williams explained that in 2007 Cypress entered into a Final Development Plan with the City which contained several conditions. One of the imposed conditions was a requirement that "no amplification" is allowed for outdoor restaurants, which is referred to as condition #15. Pinstripes has a strong desire to play amplified music on its outdoor patios and balconies. The request at this time is to have Edina remove this condition by amending the Final Development Plan. Williams told the Commission that Pinstripes and Cypress recently completed a Sound Level Assessment by David Braslau Association, Inc. to help determine, in a scientific manner, the affects to an activated balcony /patio. Concluding, Williams stated Pinstripes has requested that it be allowed to play amplified background music on the outdoor patio/baicony as long as the decibel level is below 65 at the property line. Mr. Braslau explained to the Commission the methodology behind the sound assessment. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked if the proposed outdoor music for the restaurant would be similar to the piped in music heard around the park. Mr. Schwartz acknowledged that the restaurant is part of the park and the music played in the restaurants outdoor area would be considered background music. Schwartz said conversation is paramount, reiterating the music played in the outdoor area would be background, no rap, hard rock, etc. just high quality background music. Chair Fischer commented that not all restaurants have outdoor dining with music. Mr. Schwartz agreed; pointing out that in the area there are a number of restaurants with outdoor seating and music; Cao Bella, Tavern on France and Salute. Both Cao Bella and Salute are located in close proximity to residential developments. Chair Fischer said his concern was if background music is played too loud, conversation gets louder to be heard over the music and tranquility is lost. Mr. Swartz said in is important for them to be a good neighbor, adding if music becomes an issue it can be turned 3 A discussion ensued on the allowed decibel levels and the threshold provided in the sound level assessment. It was noted there was a difficulty in obtaining levels, pointing out this area is an active park with canned music played throughout. Measurements were generated from a triangular portion of the upper deck and from the lower deck. Applicants stressed it is their goal to be an asset to Edina, and to the Centennial Lakes neighborhood. Chair Fischer said what he was hearing from the proponents was that the music from this establishment shouldn't be heard across the lake, and if it is heard across the lake it would be turned down. Mr. Williams and Mr. Schwartz agreed with that comment. Chair Fischer opened the public testimony. Residents that spoke in support of the protect. A resident gave testimony in support of the request. Kerry Kisling, 410 Coventry Place gave testimony in support of the request. Girt Lavin, Coventry resident gave testimony in support of the request. Residents that spoke in opposition of the project. Brad Winter spoke in opposition of the request. Sue Dixon, 802 Coventry Place, spoke in opposition of the request. Myra Starkenberg, resident spoke in opposition of the request. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, spoke in opposition of the request. Residents who spoke neutrally about the project (if they can't hear the music; no Issue Cindy Jarvis, 1016 Coventry Way Discussion Commissioner Brown said in his opinion this is a situation where reasonableness needs to fall in line. Brown pointed out the applicant has expressed their sincerity to abide by the conditions established by staff in support of removing condition #15. Brown stated he supports the request as submitted. Commissioner Scherer said she can't support the request. She said this location is too unique because of its proximity to the park. Concluding, Scherer said in her opinion there is no compelling reason to rescind #15. Commissioner Risser said she agrees with Commissioner Scherer, adding one issue (if #15 is rescinded) of concern would be with the type of music played. Commissioner Brown said in this situation the onus is on the applicant and they have agreed to lower the music if it violates the conditions set forth by staff. There is no down side, reiterating the onus is on them. Commissioner Carpenter said he tends to agree with Commission Brown Commissioner Risser acknowledged that the applicant appears sincere, adding maybe the Commission could add an additional condition of approval stating if the noise level is violated three times (during a specific period) the music is turned off. Commissioner Forrest pointed out that Centennial Lakes is a mixed use development, adding the Commission may not need to specify 3- strikes; however language could be crafted to ensure compliance and enforcement. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that this condition was added by the City Council, adding that presently there is an ordinance that stipulates noise standards and the means to enforce compliance with those standards. Commissioner Schroeder noted that the Commission doesn't have the reasoning behind the Council's adding of condition #15, adding the Council should be the body that eliminates this condition, not the Commission. Chair Fischer agreed, however, eliminating this as a condition is required to be heard by the Commission. Commission Brown said if the Commission would have received a concrete reason from the City Council for no amplification for this building that would be one thing, but at this time it appears the proponents are acting in good faith and have stated they would be willing to turn the music down if it becomes too loud. Concluding, Brown noted the City already has an ordinance in place regarding noise. Motion Commissioner Brown moved to recommend approval to amend the Final Development Plan for Cypress Equities condition #15s based on staff findings and subject to the following staff conditions. 1. Building must be developed per the building elevations date stamped June 249 20'10. 2. Outdoor amplification is allowed for building C. Decibel levels may not exceed the state noise regulations. 3. A "loudspeaker99 permit must be obtained from the City of Edina, and meet all applicable conditions of the permit, including that the loudspeakers must be turned off at 16.00 prn 40 All other conditions required in resolution 2007 -63 would continue to be in effect, unless otherwise stated above. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. Chair Fischer asked Commissioner Brown and Staunton hove they would feel if the wording of the motion were to read "if noise from the amplification can be heard" pointing out both the residents and proponent have stated "if we can't hear the music no problem" and "if they can hear it we will turn it down ". Commissioner Brown said he feels it would be best to go with the conditions set forth in the staff report, adding that the proponents appear to be agreeable to "keeping" the noise down and working with the residents. Commissioner Carpenter said he agrees with Chair Fischer and suggested the following amendment to the motion. "amend the proposal to allow for amplification to such levels that are not audible to residents on the east side of the lake and if the noise is audible in a manner that can be substantiated by a representative of the City on three occasions that the'right °or original restriction would apply" Commissioner Schroeder asked what happens if the proposed amendment is in conflict with what's allowed in the Loudspeaker permit. What if the noise doesn't violate the permit. Chair Fischer suggested that the City Attorney look at the wording of the motion and amendment to ensure that it is correct and asked Commissioners Brown and Staunton if they would accept the friendly amendment to their motion. Both responded in the affirmative. Mr. Knuston said he would review the motion and craft wording. Chair Fischer called for the votes motion carried. 4 -3 2010o0001e10b Final Rezoning, Final plat and Final Development Plan The Waters Senior Living of Edina /Colonial Church 6200 Colonial flay, Edina, MN Chair Fischer welcomed everyone acknowledging the interest many people have expressed for the project and established ground rules as follows: 0 City of Edina sh- Fa- Members of the Edina Planning Commission Fronr. Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager coo File Datw. 7/22//2010 Re: Cypress Equities Request to amend facade with glass partition and fireplace. At their July 6, 2010, meeting the City Council referred two items to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. The items for review and comment are for a glass partition and fireplace to accommodate a new restaurant at 7311 France Avenue. information Backciround In 2007, the City Council approved construction of a 31,000 square foot single level retail building along France Avenue, a 22,000 square foot retail building with a 5 -level parking ramp above, and a 32,960 square foot two -level retaiUrestau rant. Since construction the restaurant element of the two -level retaiUrestaurant has been vacant. As you are aware, the proposed tenant, Pinstripes has submitted plans for the vacant restaurant space. As part of their build -out they would like to change the 2007 building elevations dated June 5th to include sliding glass doors in lieu of windows on the south elevation and a new double sided stone fireplace. Please find for your review: 1. Fleeting Minutes City Council Fleeting of July 6, 2010 2. June 30, 2010, staff report 3. Building elevations. Action Requested Review and comment. 1 Minutes /Edina City CounclIJJuIy 6. 2010 and seconded by Member Swenson setting a public (bearing date gsf.JWy 2D, 20.10 fcF. The Waters, Final Development Plan, Final Plats and Final Rezoning. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING ITEM. AMENDMENT TO FiNAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN — CYPRESS EQUITIES (S/2(2010) It was noted that resident concam remained regarding the Cypress Equities project. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, requested that the public_ hearing allow comment on the applicant's June 11, 2010, request for amplification of music; the June 24, 2010, request for revised - elevation to add sliding glass doors and a Nvo -sided wood burning fireplace; and, that the August 2, 2010, public hearing notice clarify these two points. Attorney Knutson explained the public hearing before the Planning Commission only addressed amplification of music with the intention that the other two issues (sliding glass doors and wood buming fireplace) would come directly before the Council for determination whether the amendments were minor not requiring a public hearing or should be referred to the Planning Commission for hearing. The Council discussed the amendments and application timing. Mr. Hughes noted that should the Council elect to defer the two items to the Planning Commission for public hearing, it could be accommodated at their July 28, 2010; meeting. In addition, both published and mailed notice could be given for the Planning Commission'and Council meetings. Member Swenson made e- motion, seconded by. Member. Housh, setting public hearing date for planning item: amendment to final development plan, Cypress Equities, to August 2, 2010, and referring the requested amendments for the glass partition and fireplace to the Planning Commission for review and comment. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -64 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING USE OF CENTRAL COUNT BALLOT COUNTER FOR PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS The Council asked questions of City Clerk Mangen regarding the type of paper.reports generated by the ballot counter and process to count absentee ballots. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010~54, authorizing election equipment central counter for absentee ballots. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. =GRANT ACCEPTED — AGREEMENT FOR OUTDOOR_ HOCKEY RINKS PROJECTS, HENNEPIN COUNTY YOUTH SPORTS, APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson accepting the $60,000 grant awarded by the Hennepin Youth Sports Program of Hennepin County and approving the agreement for outdoor hockey rinks project as submitted and required by Hennepin County. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -66 ADOPTED — APPOINTING INTERIM CiTY MANAGER The Council noted Manager Hughes' last day would be July 30, 2010, at 4:30 p.m. and consensus was reached to revise the resolution to indicate that Interim City Manager Worthington would be appointed on an interim basis starting on July 30, 2010, at 4:31 p.m. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -56, appointing City Manager on an interim basis as revised above. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson; Hovland Motion carried. Pan= d �9tN�11� o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator fleeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague Dune 30, 2010 20%0005.10a Director of Planning Brien Description: Amendment to the Final Development Plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities. (The District.) Recommended Action: Recommend that the City Council approve the amendment. Introduction The applicant is requesting an amendment to the approved Final Development Plan to accomplish the following: Revise the approved renderings of Building C (the restaurant component). The revisions include adding sliding glass panels /doors to the outdoor patio area, a new metal panel, and a fire place on the upper balcony. The stone on the fire place would match the existing stone on the building. (See page A4.) • Remove a condition from the original approval that did not allow outdoor implication for restaurants. The intent of the request is to provide background music for customers in the outside dining areas. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages Al —A28.) In 1997, the City Council approved construction a 31,000 square foot single level retail building along France Avenue, a 22,000 square foot retail building with a 5 level parking ramp above, and a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. Total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. (See approved plans on pages A37 —A38, and the Council minutes on pages A45 —A47.) The Planning Commission recommended denial of the Final Development Plan. (See minutes on pages A40 —A44.) The restaurant building has sat vacant since its construction. A restaurant called Pinstripes would now like to occupy the space. Pinstripes would have outdoor dining on the patio and second story balcony. These uses are permitted within the MDD -6 Zoning District. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Poses Northerly: Macy's Home store; zoned and guided commercial. Easterly: Centennial Lake and condominiums; zoned for mixed use and guided multiple - family residential. Southerly: A five -story medical building; zoned for mixed use, and guided commercial. Westerly: A three -story office building; zoned and guided office. Existing Site Features The subject property is 4.2 acres in size, and contains two retail buildings totaling 86,000 square feet, and a 5 -level parking ramp. Planning Guide Plan designation: Commercial Zoning: MDD -6, Mixed Development District Building Design The changes to the building would include the addition of the sliding glass panels /doors, the metal panels and the outdoor fire place on the upper balcony. (See pages A4 —A6.) The stone on the fire place would match the existing stone on the building. Staff would consider these changes to be minor. The building would continue to meet the zoning ordinance requirement for allowed building materials. There would be no change to building height or setback. These additions to the building would be subject to building permit approval, which would include meeting all applicable building and fire code requirements. Outdoor Eating Areas Concern was raised the last time this project was reviewed, and during the pre - development, developer neighborhood meeting regarding the outdoor eating areas. As a result, the applicant had previously agreed to the condition of approval regarding noise; therefore, no amplification or outside speakers was allowed for the development. (See resolution approving the final development plan for the site on page A3.) 2 However, the restaurant that would now like to go into this space wishes to have outside amplification of music, therefore, the applicant is requesting that that condition be eliminated from the approved plan. A sound study was done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., which concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. (See Sound Study on pages A9 A28, and the specific conclusion on page Al2.) The result of the speakers turned up to those decibel levels the result would be a decibel level of no greater than 40 dBA at the residential boundary to the east. (See page A21 of the Sound Study.) The sound readings would comply with the State Noise Standards as attached on pages A29 —A34.) The sound study further concludes that ambient noise or existing noise generated in the area provides more noise than would be generated from the outdoor music when measured at the residential lot line on the east side of the lake. (See page A21.) Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The comprehensive plan designates the site for commercial use. The proposed use is permitted within the MDD -6 zoning district, which this property is designated. No variances were requested as part of the original approval. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; The proposal is for an amendment to the final development plan; therefore, a preliminary development plan is not necessary in this instance. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The proposal to allow outdoor amplification would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. A sound study was done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., which concludes that a maximum sound level of 60 -65 dBA would be acceptable for the site, and would not exceed the States acceptable decibel readings at residential property. (See Sound Study on pages A9 - A28.) Sound levels from the amplification would not exceed ambient sound levels at the residential lot line on the east side of the lake. (See page A21.) d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; There is no change in the uses that were originally proposed for the site. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; Again, the proposed plan does not change the square footage of the building. Therefore, there would not be an increase in traffic. t) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and Again, there are no significant changes to the building. The applicant would be required to obtain all necessary permits regarding building construction of the new glass panels and the fire place. An amplification permit would be necessary for the outside speakers. (See attached City Code provision regarding "Loudspeakers or similar devices," and the permit application on pages A35 —A36.) Please note that the speakers would be required to be turned off by 10:00 pm: g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Primary Issue o Are the proposed amendments to the final devellopment place reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed amendments would meet all .applicable City Code requirements. The previous final development plan that was approved for this site did not include any variances. Therefore, they are entitled to the uses and plan that were presented. Outside amplification is an allowed 51 use, as long as acceptable decibel levels are met, and a loudspeaker permit is obtained. Therefore, it is reasonable to allow this use on the site. 2. The sound study by David Braslau Associates, Inc., concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. (See Sound Study on pages A9 A28, and the specific,conclusion on page Al2.) 3. The proposed revisions to the building elevation meet al -1 minimum zoning ordinance requirements and would meet the acceptable building materials that would be allowed by City Code. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council approve the amendment to the final development plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2) The sound study done by David Braslau Associates, Inc., concludes that a maximum sound level of 65 dBA (decibels) on the lower patio and upper triangular part of the upper deck and 60 dBA from the upper deck would be acceptable for the site to meet state law regarding noise. Approval of the final development plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Building must be developed per the building elevations date stamped June 24, 2010. 2) Outdoor amplification is allowed for building C. Decibel levels may not exceed the state noise regulations. 3) A "Loudspeaker" permit must be obtained from the City of Edina, and meet all applicable conditions of the permit, including that the loudspeakers must be turned off at 10:00 pm. 4) All other conditions required in Resolution 2007 -63 would continue to be in effect, unless otherwise stated above. Deadline for a city decision: 6 c, 0i r � —f �— 01 5 Carlyle /Cypress Edina, LLC 8343 Douglas Avenue, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75225 June 10, 2010 Nir. Cary Teague, AICP Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50x, Street Edina, MN 55424 Re. Centennial Shops — 7311 France Avenue, Edina MN Dear Mr. Teague. "KL o C As you are aware, Cypress Equities has entered into a long tenn lease with a high quality dining and entertainment tenant known as Phistripes that will occupy the entirety of the lake building of our development located at 7311 France Avenue. As has been discussed on numerous occasions, Pinstripes is keenly interested in opening and operating its business in a manner that is satisfactory to the community's interest as well as alleviating any concerns regarding noise issues in the neighborhood. On June 5, 2007, Cypress Equities entered into a Final Development Plan with the City of Edina, which contained, among other items, several City Council imposed conditions for Cen #ennial Shops. One of these imposed conditions was a requirement that "no amplification is allowed far outdoor restaurants" (condition #15). As Pinstripes strongly desires to play amplified music on its outdoor patios and balconies, our request is have the City of Edina remove this condition by amending the Final Development Plan. In an effort to alleviate any sound concerns regarding the removal of this condition which prohibits amplification for outdoor restaurants, we believe that the following thoughts are, e easonable "solutions" to the issues being discussed, and we would propose that the City and Pinstripes /Cypress work together to accomplish these mutual goals. First, with regard to amplified,musie, Pinstripes and Cypress Equities very recently completed a Sound Level"" by David Braslau Associates, Inc. to help determine, in a very scientific manner, the affects of an activated balcony /patio (inclusive of playing amplified nnusic) on the surrounding neighborhood. The conclusions of this report are very straight forward and clearly state that the sound generated from the activity of Pinstripes' outdoor areas will not create audible levels that are greater than those ambient levels that currently exist at surrounding neighborhoods. Second, with respect to the specific prohibition on "outside amplified music," Pinstripes requests that it be allowed to play "amplified" background music on the outside patios and balconies as long as the decibel level is below 65 at the property line, in which case (per the attached sound analysis) such background music will not be audible at the path adjacent to the lake on the far east side. Upon initial design, Pinstripes will be able to set the volume level of music, and also Mr. Cary Teague, AICP City of Edina Page 2 the location and direction of its speakers, and sound engineers will ensure that the decibel levels will be such that the music will be background in nature and will not be heard across the lake. Third, please note that the attached Sound Level Assessment does not contemplate the attenuating affects of a glass wall that could be erected to further mitigate any sound reaclung the Coventry development. This Sound Level Assessment does, however, discuss the vast attenuating affects of the existing glass windows at the site and the fact that interior sound generated at Pinstripes will not be heard by any establishment in the Coventry. That said, we are still open to erecting a -U- I length (from floor to ceiling) glass wall at the balcony corridors as earlier proposed, but only in response to the City of Edina allowing for outdoor amplified music for outside enclosed and/or non - enclosed areas. In conclusion, we want to again thank the City of Edina for their attention to our request for an amendment to our Final Development Plan that will allow for the conditional "amplification of outdoor restaurants' at Centennial Shops. As always, we welcome any questions or comments that you may have and we look forward to discussing this with you soon. Best regards, J. Kirk Williams, CCIM Senior Vice President of Development Cc: Brett Witzig Dale Schwartz Enclosure(s) ,� a'- Ph (214) 561 -8800 Fax(214)283-1600 ° PO -63 ESL I . APPROVING Al IENDN-1ENT TO n- 1ASTEP PLAN �+ — AND FINAL DEVELOPTA4ENT PLAN CYPRESS EQU1'I'IES BE IT RESOLVED, that the Amendment to the Nlasler PLm and Final Development Plan requested by C)-press Equities for 73 -I1 France Avenue based ul?on the plans submitted at the June 5, 2007 City Council meeting is hereby approved including setback variances along the west and north sides of file property. B1: IT PURTHFlt It1SOLVl =D drat the approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to shif approval, die site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the comlifions below: • Site plan date stamped April 4, 2007-date changed to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council • Grading plan date stamped April 4, 2007, • Building elevations elate stamped April 4, 2007 - date changed to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council. 2. Final grading, drainage and uiilily plaiis, submitled with the building permit, are subject to review and approval of die city engineer. 3. Providing storm water best mamig;entent practices on site and submission of plans and Specifications to Nine Mile Creel: Watershed District for approval. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's recluirements. 4. ExecUti011 of a developer's agreement. 5. Dedication of a transit easement across the property. 6. A cross access easement is required to allow access to 7373 France Avenue, properly to the south. 7. Submission of proof of permission (oascmenls) to City Engineer from the owner of 7235 Prance Avenue to access 7311 Trance Avenue across their property; or S. Submission of plans and specifications to Hennepin County Engineer for work completed with County right -of -way; 9. A,;reement to provide a signal agreement and roadi,+ny modification permits with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 70. The property mvi-jer is responsible for replacing any require cl landscaping that dies. 11. Receipt of executed amendment to exislirnf; covenants agreement addressing park maintenance assessment if trees -,ire eilowod to be removed in the park. Submission of plans and specifications to Park Direclor for any proposed work to City part: property for approval. 12. The Centennial Lakes paths must remain open and usable throughout die construction of the project. 13. The bituminous padj%%,ay must be 1niiled a11cl overlaid. 14. Developer must prepare plans for covering; and reducing sound of the outdoor delivery area and regulate delivery time to reduce 111115ance effects to adjoining properties. 15. No amplification is allowed for aulcloor rrsiaurlults. . 16. Approvals do not include any signaoc. Separate Sion permits would be required for any signage. Signs that do not meet the sign ordinance would require variances. 17. The project shall be built with materials as shown on the plans and specs, and the parking structure shall have louvers on all four sidCS with Lhe north side elevation architect ral (jeh i15 and augmented landscaping acceplab)c Lo Edina c;iy staff. Adopted this 5t1, day of June, 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, C'it), __ -- James B. Hovland, A•faynr �Ci y Hall 952 - 927 -88G1 4801 WEST 507H STREET t FAX 952 - 826 -M90 LDINA, ,MINNESOTA, 55-12-1-1394 wwar.cilyc�ledina.cu>n1 TTY 952 -426 -0379 Nl+i glnnw faH�n, r . � " t -- N[w (lllll< S NU%TKtllm F•+I.r � %r�liMA. f j , ' - Erl1/AR V41vM1 GMdd + %Ip r Perspective June 2411h, 2010 Pinstripes Aria Group Puchitecte,Inc. Edina, Minnesota r r.�............,....I_....—. Existing Wood Cladding i South Elevation Pinstripes June 24th 2-010 Edina, Minnesota m Aria Group Architects, Inc. M in ..... ............................... I� � � I I II I I' 1 1 i 1 I� I� -JI . Perspective r .r i; A11 / i :r! - ',_r•'`.vr •rte'., Existing stone Veneer New Slone Fireplace r New Glass & Aluminum Entry Vesllbule C Exisling Wood Cladding ,_4 New Metal Fence to Match Existing r New Sliding Glass Doors Existing Metal Columns- . i I ; } 44 r I r_ ', 1, PiPinstripes June 24th, 2010 nstri es . Allies GeeupAxrhlteetc.Inc. Edina, Minnesota ONO ^• ° " "•` ••• "' " "" • " •" '1e° '| ! . ' i' � S �L | ' .� [ South Elevation | . . ' ' ! 1 � _�� � —[ l ! � � —` � � [ —+ Stan. Ve=er Existing Slorefroni New Sliding Glass Door. *�_� ' me Fireplace =���°��"_�/ Wood Cladding New Metal Panels at Low Wall ' Pinstripes June 24th, 2010 Edina, Minnesota �w Ajia Group ArcWterts, Inc. Scale 118" = T-O" Pinstripes - I st floor plan June 24, 2010 Edina, Minnesota .:7pl c-� Pinstripes - 2nd floor plan 5cale 118 12 -100 N Edina, Minnesota 1-1. 1- (D SG nd Level Assessment Pins -trl es- Resta-ut rant Ediga5 !Aianesata Prepared for Cypress Equities Dallas, 'pews by David I3rasIau Associates, Inc. 1313 5`h St. SE Suite 322 NUnneapohs, -TVIN 55414 612 -331 -4571 May 2010 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. IAA% Sound Level 4ssessme ', T able of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ .............................12 2.0 NOISE CONCEPTS AND TFR-T�UN CLOG Y ................................. ............................... 3 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ............................... ............................... 4 4.0 ARIBIENT SOURED LEK VEL MY-PAS =I K T ANTS ........................... ............................... 6 5.0 SOURED LEVEL PIS. EDICTIONS ..................................................... ............................... 9 5.1. Sound Level of Voices and Music on the Deck of Patio .................. ............................... 9 5.2. Sound Level Projections ................................................................... ............................... 9 6.0 RESTAURANT AA PLIFFEID SOUND SBIULUAT ION ............ ............................... 12 6.1. Sound Simulation Setup ................................................................. ............................... 12 6.2. Patio Sound Simulation .................................................................. ............................... 12 6.3. Deck Sound Simulation .................................................................. ............................... 13 7.0 HUSIC INSIDE THE RESTAU1-LA-NT .......................................... ............................... 14 8.0 RECOY5,12:NDED AMPLIFIED SOUND IJDMTS ..................... ............................... 16 APPENDIX A Photographs of Loudspeaker for Sound Simiulation Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Eraslau flssociates, bzc. �y �1 � V Pinstrioes Restaurant —Edina, A9J Sound Level Assessment- List of Figures l g-nre 3.1 Proposed Restaurant Location and Sound Level Analysis Sites ...... ............................... 5 Figure 4.1 Statistical Sound Lewes Distributions at Site 1 ................................... ............................... 7 Figure 4.2 Statistical, Sound Lewes Distrihation at Site 2 .................................... ............................... S Figure5.1 Sound Level Projections of Voices and Music .................................... ............................10, Figure 5.2 A eraBe Spectra at receptor Sites with Predicted Music and Voices Spectra ............ 1i 1 Figure 7.1 Fstiunated Sound Level at Site 2 frown m0 dRA Music Inside the Restaurant ..............15 List of Tables Table 4.1 Ntmuesota Noise Standards .......................... Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page ....................... 2 Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina An' Sound Level Assessment E3MCUTY HM A�y The proposed Pinstripes Restaurant is to be located on the west side of Centennial Lakes North Park in Edina, Minnesota. To the east of the lake is the residential community of Coventry Townhomes. The nearest unit in the development is approximately 290 feet east of the proposed restaurant. Residences at the southeast corner of the lake are approximately 500 feet from the restaurant. Pinstripes is a bowling, bocce, and bistro establishment, two stories tall. Bowling will be an indoor activity. There will be seating areas on the ground floor patio and on the deck. Pinstripes will be open year round; however outdoor activity will be minimal to non - existent at times due to weather conditions. The facility will be operating into the nighttime hours. The objectives of this sound level assessment are to establish the existing ambient sound levels at the Coventry Townhomes, to demonstrate compliance with state noise standards of any sound emanating from the restaurant, and to establish limits on amplified sound to ensure minimum impact on the existing ambient sound level environment at the residential area. Potential impacts are assessed with respect to the State of Minnesota nighttime noise standards and measured existing ambient sound levels. Ambient soundlevel measurements were made at the two locations shown on Figure 3.1 to represent existing background sound levels at the Coventry Townhomes. These readings were taken on Saturday afternoon and evening, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. The conditions were selected to represent a typical summer evening when the Pinstripes deck and patio would be in operation. Sound level projections were made of voice and music at each of the two residential sites from the deck, patio, and triangular deck.. Based upon these projections, expected sound levels are well below the Minnesota nighttime L10 55 limit and also well below the ambient level at each of the sites. Simulation of sound levels from the deck and patio was performed to provide an opportunity to measure sound levels from the proposed restaurant and used to establish limits to have minimal impact on the Coventry Townhomes development. Because of considerable ambient noise and the need to clearly associate any observed or measured sound form the simulation loudspeaker, a unique swept sine wave signal was used that could be easily recognized. Based upon theoretical predictions and simulated sound testing on the restaurant patio and deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the ground level patio. Because the deck is higher and more exposed to the environment, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 60 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the deck. While no simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck, the theoretical predictions which take into account additional distance from the lake show that a sound level on this portion of the deck would be about 5 dBA lower than at the east end of the deck. Therefore, for amplified sound on the triangular portion of the deck, it is recommend that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page I Pinstrii2es Restaurant — Edina MV Sound Level Assessmeni 1.0 UgTRODUCF ION, The objectives of this sound level assessment are to establish the existing ambient sound levels in the vicinity of the proposed Pinstripes Restaurant in Edina, Minnesota, and to assess expected sound levels in the residential area across the lake to the east and the level of background sound from loudspeakers that can be provided on the deck and patio with windows open without impacting the areas. For varying sources such as voices and background music, the 1Viinnesota L10 standard, or that level exceeded for 10% or 6 minutes of an hour, is the applicable standard. Since residential land uses or receptor sites are involved and the restaurant could operate beyond 10 pm into the nighttime (10 pm to 7 am) hours as defined in the Minnesota rules, sound levels from the restaurant will be compared with the L10 55 dBA residential niEhttime standard. The state noise standards (MIST Rule 7030.0040) are presented in Table 1.1. Sound levels in the table are specified in terms of the dBA or A- weighted decibel. It should be noted that, while these are receiving land use and not source standards, they have been interpreted by the state as applying to sources that impact the receiving land use. Thus, they do not include ambient levels not associated with the source in question. This sound level metric or measure is commonly used throughout the world in evaluating environmental and community noise levels and is a single number that combines all frequencies of sound by weighting the level of individual frequencies similar to that which is done by the human ear. Table 1.1 NUt janesata Noise Standards This sound assessment analyzes the most sensitive receptor sites which are the closest residential structures to the site that would be exposed to sound from the restaurant. For this study, two sites were selected to represent the residential neighborhood east of the lake are shown on the aerial photograph in Figure 3.1. Site I was chosen to represent the area at the southeast end of the lake. Site 2 was chosen to represent the closest residence to the proposed patio and deck. Ambient sound levels were measured in the afternoon to describe existing daytime levels and after 10 pm to represent existing nighttime levels. Spot ambient spectral (or multiple frequency) sound levels were also taken at these sites to help establish permissible background sound levels in the restaurant without having a significant impact on existing sound levels. Sound levels in the neighborhood are currently dominated by traffic on France Avenue, on Parkland Avenue, especially the bridge at the south end of the lake, the fountain in the lake, sound from park walkway loudspeakers, pedestrian conversations on the walkuray along the lake, persons using paddle boats on fl1e lalce, and overflying aircraft. Prepared for Cypress Equities by Dmdd Braslau Associates, Inc. AI3 Page 2 Daytime (7 am to 10 m ) Ni httime (10 pm. to 7 am Noise Area Classification L10 L50 L10 I L50 NAC -1 (residential) 65 60 55 50 NTAC -2 (commercial) 70 65 70 65 NAC -3 (industrial) 1 00 75 80 75 This sound assessment analyzes the most sensitive receptor sites which are the closest residential structures to the site that would be exposed to sound from the restaurant. For this study, two sites were selected to represent the residential neighborhood east of the lake are shown on the aerial photograph in Figure 3.1. Site I was chosen to represent the area at the southeast end of the lake. Site 2 was chosen to represent the closest residence to the proposed patio and deck. Ambient sound levels were measured in the afternoon to describe existing daytime levels and after 10 pm to represent existing nighttime levels. Spot ambient spectral (or multiple frequency) sound levels were also taken at these sites to help establish permissible background sound levels in the restaurant without having a significant impact on existing sound levels. Sound levels in the neighborhood are currently dominated by traffic on France Avenue, on Parkland Avenue, especially the bridge at the south end of the lake, the fountain in the lake, sound from park walkway loudspeakers, pedestrian conversations on the walkuray along the lake, persons using paddle boats on fl1e lalce, and overflying aircraft. Prepared for Cypress Equities by Dmdd Braslau Associates, Inc. AI3 Page 2 Pinstripes Restaura?zt —Edina A7 Sound Level.Assessment 2..0, NGENE CONCEPTS .A-ND TERMENGLOGY An excellent introduction to noise levels and common terminology can be-found in the publication by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota, which was updated in October 2008 and can be found at the following website: hM://www.Rca.state.=.ILs/publicaticns/R-gen6-01.2 df Excerpts from the guide's summary are presented.below: Minnesota's noise pollution rules are based on statistical calculations that quantify noise levels according to duration over a one -hour monitoring period. The L10 calculation is the noise level that is exceeded for 10 percent, or six minutes, of the hour, and the L50 calculation is the noise level exceeded for 50 percent, or 30 minutes, of the hour. There is not a limit on maximum noise. The statutory limits for a residential location are L10 = 65 dBA and L50 = 60 dBA during the daytime (7:00 a.m. —10:00 p.m.) and L10 = 55 dBA and L50 = 50 dBA during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. — 7:00 a.m.) Oviinn. State Noise Pollution Control Rules 7030.0040). This means that during the one -hour period of monitoring, daytime noise levels cannot exceed 65 dBA for more than 10 percent of the time, and cannot exceed 60 dBA more than 50 percent of the time. Decibel 6evcis of common noise sour -ass 140 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Jet Engine (at 25 meters) 130 --------------------------- - - - - -- Jet Aircraft (at 100 meters) 120 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Rock Concert 110 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Pneumatic Chipper 100 ---------------------------- - - - - -- Jackhammer (at one meter) 90 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Chainsaw, Lawn Avower (at one meter) 80 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Heavy Truck Traffic 70 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Business Office, Vacuum Cleaner. (at three meters) 60 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Conversational Speech, Typical TV Volume 50 ------------ ---------------------- Library 40 ---=------------------------- - - - - -- Bedroom 30 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Secluded Woods 20 ----------------------------- - - - - -- Whisper The L10 level is commonly used to address varying sources, i.e. sources that are not continuous such as mechanical equipment. Potential sound levels from the proposed restaurant are compared with this standard to ensure that the restaurant will be in compliance with state noise standards. In addition to compliance with state rules, limits on background music sound levels are recommended to ensure minimal impact on existing ambient sound levels. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau ,Associates, Inc. Page 3 �•f `I Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina MAI Sound Level Assessment i Figuire 3.1 Firoposed Resiaomnwi 1Locafionn and `i punnnd ILeveg Annallysns SUcs Prepared.for Cypress .Equities by David .Braslau ilssociates, Inc. Page 5 .0 p� 2w � }I - -- - S07/_nd Level ,Assessment Pinsn i es Restaurant — Edinc. 1 A 3�0, ilR(a—JECT DDESCREPTIGI A,ND, L- OEA TIG The proposed Pinstripes Restaurant is to -be, located on the i,�est side of Centennial Lakes North Park in Edina; Minnesota To the east.of the lake is the residential community of Coventry Townhomes. The nearest unit-in the development is approximately 290 feet east of the proposed restaurant. Residences at the southeast cover of the lake are approximately 500 feet from the restaurant. strip es -is _abowl>l g.boccz,'_4nd bistro_ establishment, two stories tall. Bowling will bean indoor activity. There will be seating areas on the ground floor patio and on-the deck. Pinstripes will be open yzar round; ho,,�,var outdoor actiYit) will be minimal to non - existent at times due to weather conditions. The facility u!ill be opara-tinc, into the nighttime hours. PrePared for C�;Press Ea, z%ities by David Braslau .4ssocic_ies, P-rc. r� f Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. A1Ai Sound Level Assessment 4.01 A36BIENT, SOUND L1:YTL IN x AS URk N + NTS Ambient sound level measurements were made at the two locations shown on Figure 3.1 to represent existing background sound levels at the Coventry TmAmhomes. These readings were taken on Saturday afternoon and evening; May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. Weather conditions were ideal for sound level monitoring, i.e. no wind, no precipitation, and moderate temperatures. The conditions were selected to represent a typical summer evening when the Pinstripes deck and patio would be in operation. Continuous statistical sound levels for one hour were collected using Larson Davis Model 700 Type 2 Sound Level Meters using 1- minute intervals to identify any unusual occurrences during the monitoring period. Spot sound level readings were also taken using a Casella CEL 593 Type 1 meter at each of the continuous monitoring locations as a check on the continuous readings and to provide a basis for establishing limits on amplified sound from the restaurant to ensure minimum impact on existing ambient sound levels. A range of statistical descriptors were taken that help characterize the ambient noise environment. The LO1 (level exceeded 1 % or 36 seconds per hour) represents the noisiest events during the hour. The L10 (level exceeded 10% or six minutes per hour) represents relatively loud levels that regularly occur in the hour such as passing traffic. The L50 (level exceeded 50% or 30 minutes per hour or median level) is often used to represent the average noise level during the hour. The L90 (level exceeded 90% or 54 minutes per hour) is commonly used to represent the ambient or background sound level environment since it is only quieter than this for six minutes of the hour. Statistical distributions of sound level at Site 1 are shown on Figure 4.1. Statistical distributions of sound level at Site 2 are shown on Figure 4.2. Traffic noise, especially at 5 pm on a weekday, is considerably higher than during other periods. Prepared for C }press Equities by David BI'aslau Associates, Inc. Page 6 �{ r i Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina MIV Sound Level Assessment 70 65 60 55 50 z 45 40 35 30 ... ---- .. -.... ...�- �- �,� -,-. , ...... . C'J r- Cl) CO CO CO (7 CO M OD C7 OD 10 CO Figure 44.1 Staitisticag Sound ]LeveA Distributions at S®te I Prepared, for Cypress Equities by David Brastatr Associates, Inc. Page 7 O (O 2 C:' N 0 '0 OF' (V, i�CD i'0 O O O N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N Hour I � INote:Noise from down 1 R , I Note: Background noise up due to crickets, etc. 1 • 1 • 110:00 0 L01 Ll 1 1 •1 30 ... ---- .. -.... ...�- �- �,� -,-. , ...... . C'J r- Cl) CO CO CO (7 CO M OD C7 OD 10 CO Figure 44.1 Staitisticag Sound ]LeveA Distributions at S®te I Prepared, for Cypress Equities by David Brastatr Associates, Inc. Page 7 O (O 2 C:' N 0 '0 OF' (V, i�CD i'0 O O O N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N Hour � A .o l'1 c� b A 4 A A ti 0 n a� m ti 1 C%± _P a_ c e a e C O� g e� v;� w 17:38 0 17:41 17:45 17:49 17:53 17:58 18:02 18:06 18:10 18:14 18:18 18:22 18:26 18:30 18:34 x 22:05 22:09 22:13 22:17 22:21 22:25 22:29 22:34 2:38 2:42 22:46 22:50 22:54 22:58 23:02 xx (dBA) w A a cn cn rn o o Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. A& Sound Level _Assessment 5.0 SOUND LDR VTJL PREDICTIGNS 5.1. Sound Level of Voices and Music on the Deck of Patio Predicted sound levels from voices on the deck and patio were based upon published speech level spectra of loud male and female voices Predicted sound levels from music from loudspeakers on the deck and patio were based upon a measured spectrum of typically loud classical music adjusted to a level of 70 dBA at 16 feet from a loudspeaker. 5.2. Sound Level Projections Sound level projections of voice and music at each of the two residential sites from the deck, patio, and triangular deck are shown in Figare 5.1. Based upon the theoretical projections of sound levels, expected sound levels are well below the Minnesota nighttime L10 55 limit and also well below the ambient level at each of the sites. The spectral characteristics of the monitored ambient sound levels shown in Figure 5.2 are compared with the predicted spectra for voices and speech at the nearest residence (Site 2). When any frequency associated with voices or amplified music lies below the ambient spectrum, the sound is generally considered to be inaudible. The figure shows that the spectra for voices and amplified music are well below the ambient spectrum at all frequencies and are therefore likely to be inaudible under the observed conditions. Without crickets at night some music if played at 70 dBA on the patio may be minimally audible although levels below 70 dBA will likely be masked by ambient sound levels.. Based upon theoretical. predictions and simulated sound testing on the restaurant patio and deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the ground level patio. Because the deck is higher and more exposed to the environment, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 60 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted on the deck. While no simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck, the theoretical predictions which take into account additional distance from the lake show that a sound level on this portion of the deck would be about 5 dBA lower than at the east end of the deck. Therefore, for amplified sound on the triangular portion of the deck, it is recommend that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA (measured 16 feet from the loudspeaker) be permitted. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David BI'aslau _Associates, Inc. Page 9 11 a 0 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina AIN Sound Level Assessment .1 50 40 ICI 30 a 9 20 10 W P rea06ded Home LevWs [Voice level based on 40 people on balcony with half speaking at a loud voice effort] [Music level based on L10 70 dBA at 15 ft from loudspeakers] [10:00 pm monitored L10 levels are also shown] Voices - Deck Voices - Patio Il+iguWc 5.1 Residence 2 ambient at 10 pm --56 dBA Residence 1 ambient at 10 pm - 53 Voices - Music - Deck Music - Patio TriangleDeck Sound ]Level Firojectioans oll'Voices 2nd Music Prepared.for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 10 Music - TriangleDeck Cl Res 1 O Res 2 t PinsA•iryes Restaurant — Edina. A47V Sound Level Assessment Xi]it, 50.0 40.0 v a� T 3 30.0 s Q ►11 10.0 0.0 _ _ N _ _ _ _ = N O N O O N O ul O O M N f7 In W O O O n N W W Y O N f'1 In W � Y N N [! 1Figulre 52 Average Spectra at Receptor Sites with Predicted Music and Voices Spectra Prepared, jor Cypress Equities by David Bi-aslau Associates, Inc. Page ' ' — 0 Site 1 5pm r"^�Site 1 10 pm -- Site 25pm —Site 2 10 pm —— Voices on Deck at Site 2 ® Music 70 dBA at 15 feet Jq — �. Music background Finale level based upon orchestral music (example here Is of GaM Parlslenne) N. Voice level assumes 40 people on nearest deck sliling around 10 tables with half of them speaking al.lhe same time with loud voices and a 00/40 male /female mix - 290 0.0 _ _ N _ _ _ _ = N O N O O N O ul O O M N f7 In W O O O n N W W Y O N f'1 In W � Y N N [! 1Figulre 52 Average Spectra at Receptor Sites with Predicted Music and Voices Spectra Prepared, jor Cypress Equities by David Bi-aslau Associates, Inc. Page ' ' — 0 Site 1 5pm r"^�Site 1 10 pm -- Site 25pm —Site 2 10 pm —— Voices on Deck at Site 2 ® Music 70 dBA at 15 feet Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina .h9\r Sound Level Assessment 6.0 RESTAURANT AN[PL ' 1 N D SOUND UATIO 6.1. Sound Simulation Setup Simulation of sound levels from the deck and patio was performed to provide an opportunity to measure sound levels from the proposed restaurant and used to establish limits to have minimal impact on the Coventry Townhomes development. The simulation also provides an opportunity to substantiate predicted sound levels or identify potential problems with the simulation setup. Because of considerable ambient noise and the need to clearly associate any observed or measured sound form the simulation loudspeaker, a unique swept sine wave signal was used that could be easily recognized. Photos of the equipment placement are included in Appendix A. Only the top loudspeaker shown in the photos was used in the patio and deck simulation tests. while any loudspeakers would be directed away from the residenti al area or mounted in the ceiling, the speaker faced the residential area in the simulation to provide a clearer signal for the test and the opportunity to measure the flee field sound level unimpeded by reflections off the exterior glass wall along the patio and deck. The signal was calibrated at 60, 70 and 80 dBA at a distance of 16 feet, which is the approximate distance of ceiling speakers or column mounted.speakers facing away from the residential area 6.2. Patio Sound Simulation By plotting the time history of the measured sound level spectrum, it is possible to "see" how sound behaves over time. Since the test used a unique periodic signal sweeping from low to high frequency, it could be easily identified among the complex sound environment created by existing sources in the area- For example, sharp high random peaks at high frequencies due to bird. songs or from voices along the walkway around the lake could not be confused with a steady periodic sound level. During the measurement at Site 2 with a loudspeaker on the patio, the signal could just be heard when listening carefully for the signal. The ambient sound level just after the test was measured at 48 to 49 dBA. The sound level with the 70 dBA test signal was measured at 48 to 49 dBA so the overall level did not change. The predicted L10 70 dBA amplified music level from the patio at Site 2 was 35 dBA (Figure 5.1). While the simulated 70 dBA level could not be measured since it was below the background level, it is estimated that the maximum simulated signal at Site 2 would have measured approximately 38 to 39 dBA. Since the L10 for music can be 4 to 10 dBA below the maximum level, a music level with maxim''— m vel of 70 dBA would have an estimated L10 of 30 to 35 dBA which compares favorably with the predicted L10 Level of 35 dBA. With the test signal strength on the patio increased to 80 dBA, the time history sound level measurement at Site 2 clearly showed the periodic signal and the sound was clearly audible at this level. The overall dBA level with the 80 dBA signal was about 50 dBA, or 1 to 2 dBA above ambient. If the 80 dBA signal is subtracted from the total level using decibel subtraction, the sound level due only to the 80 dBA signal alone is estimated to be 48 to 49 dBA. This is consistent with the estimated 10 dBA lower 70 dBA signal level which was estimated in the paragraph above at 38 to 39 dBA. Thus, based upon the sound simulation, a maximum level of 70 dBA for amplified sound on the patio could be considered an upper limit. To provide some margin of safety a maximum level of 65 dBA when measured 16 feet from a loudspeaker in the direction of the Coventry Townhomes, could be set as an initial target for level on the patio. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 12 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. MV ,Sound Level Assessment At Site 1, an initial test signal level of 80 dBA was followed by a lower signal of 70 dBA. While the 80 dBA signal could be clearly identified from the data, the 70 dBA signal was again lost in the ambient sound. The ambient sound level at Site 1 was measured at 45 dBA compared with 48 to 49 at Site 2. The measured sound level with the 80 dBA signal was 48 dBA, or an increase above ambient of 3 dBA. Using decibel subtraction, the 80 dBA signal at Site 1 should measure 45 dBA. Thus; a 70 dBA signal would be 10 dBA lower or 35 dBA. With the L10 level for music 4 to 10 dBA lower, the music L10 level would be expected to be about 25 to 30 dBA (compared with 35 dBA at Site 1). This value is also consistent with the lower predicted music L10 level at Site 1 shown on Figure 5.1. While the 70 dBA signal is about 5 dBA lower at Site 1 than at Site 2, the ambient level at Site 1 is also lower by about 3 dBA. Therefore, a 70 dBA limit to amplified sound on the patio is expected to have a similar minimal impact on the ambient at Site 1. The 65 dBA maximum limit on amplified sound on the patio should therefore provide the same protection or safety margin at Site 1 as at Site 2. 6.3. Deck Sound Simulation For the deck sound simulation at Site 2, the test began with the 80 dBA signal followed by the 70 dBA signal. The 80 dBA signal could be clearly identified in the data After dropping the level by 10 dBA to 70 dBA, some periodicity from the test signal could still be detected. Unfortunately no reading was taken at the 60 dBA level since wind was beginning to be a factor and additional readings at Site 1 were needed. However, a 5 dBA reduction in the test signal to 65 dBA would not be sufficient to bring the signal down below the ambient level at Site 2. Therefore, a limiting level of 60 dBA would be needed for amplified sound on the deck to ensure minimum audibility at the nearest residence (Site 2). The 80 dBA signal from the deck at Site 1 was not clearly audible and was masked by other sharp high frequency peaks that were due in part by birds and in part by the wind which was starting to rustle leaves in the area and adding to the high frequency levels. Reducing the signal to 70 dBA did not have any effect on the sharper high frequency peaks, confirming that these were due to sources other than the test signal. When the signal was reduced to 60 dBA and the meter sensitivity increased to capture that level, wind on the microphone as well, as in the trees dominated the sound level although no periodic peaks associated with the 60 dBA signal could be detected. Thus, based upon the deck sound simulation data for Site 2 and Site 1, a 60 dBA level should ensure minimum audibility at these sites. Prepared for Cypress Equities by Dm,id Braslau Associates, 177c. Pae 13 ,�'�� g Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina. W Sound Level slssessnieni 5.0 MUSIC DiSI E THE RESTAUI RANT An additional concern addressed here is the leakage of sound from inside the restaurant to outside areas. Prior to simulating sound from the patio and deck, indoor -to- outdoor sound level measurements were made only on the patio level since glazing is identical on the first and second floor. A steady signal at 103 dBA at 10 feet with a flat spectrum from 50 Hz and above was generated inside the space and measurements taken at several distances and locations inside and outside of the space. An ambient measurement was also taken to ensure that the measured difference in sound from inside to outside was not affected by the outside sound level. The outdoor ambient level at the patio railing was 50 dBA wlule the test signal was measured at 63 dBA. The ambient level was more than 10 dBA below the test signal level and therefore did not affect the measurement of attenuation by the Mndows. . Based upon an average of readings inside and outside windows, it was determined that the windows provide an attenuation of 31 dBA. With an 80 dBA interior level at the windows, a sound level of only 49 dBA can be expected at the patio railing. When projected to the nearest residence (Site 2), the sound level spectrum would be well below the observed ambient as shown on Figure 7.1. This assumes that the patio windows are open. If the patio windows are closed, the level could drop another 25 to 30 dBA, depending upon the windows and window installation. This reduction in level would also apply to any sound on the patio or deck if the windows were closed. Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates. hoc. Paoe 14 Pinstripes Restaurant — Edina A47V Sound Level Assessment 60.0 50.0 40.0 i a+ 30.0 a 9 CO) OUR ill"I 0.0 4- 100 Flz 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1k25 1 k 2k 216 3k15 4k 5k Flz Hz Flz Hz Hz Flz Flz Flz Hz Hz Flz Hz Hz Hz Flz Hz Flz ]Figu ire 7.1 E, stiumatedl Sound ILevcH at Site 2 1Grom 80 dBAi Music lusidie the Restauira ®t Prepared, for Cypress Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 15 —� Music Ambient Pinstripes Restaurant —Edina n' Sound Level Assessment Ap�eID di Location of loudspeaker on the patio. The top speaker only was used for the simulation. 1 p C � - r. l� �J Location of loudspeaker on the deck. i Prepared for C} p•ess Equities by David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 1 pinstri es Restaw -ant —Edina Ate' Sound Level Assessment s.a RDvCQ-lP'II�2R'D)�D AIWIPLIIaILI� � U� LLr\' FS Loudspeakers can be appropriately designed to direct amplified sound where it is needed and to limit sound where it is not needed. When ceiling speakers are used, an appropriate coverage angle directed towards the floor can be used to limit spillover of sound outside of the desired area Where small loudspeakers are wall or column- mounted; they can be directed away from the residential area, carefully aimed to avoid reflections off the glass exterior, and if necessary provided with sound shielding behind to limit radiation of sound behind the loudspeaker. The recommendations below refer to limited sound levels at the edge or railina of the patio or deck which is essentially the property line of the restaurant. The sound system designer can select loudspeaker types, locations, orientation and sound levels that can comply with these limits. The sound level at the east or south edge of the patio should not exceed the limits below based upon the acoustic power needed to generate that level at 16 feet from the loudspeaker. Based upon theoretical predictions and simulated sound testing on the restaurant patio and deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA be permitted on the ground level patio. Because the deck is higher and more exposed to the environment, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 60 dBA be permitted on the deck. While no simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck, the theoretical predictions which take into account additional distance from the lake show that a sound level on this portion of the deck would be about 5 dBA lower than at the east end of the deck. Therefore, for amplified sound on the triangular portion of the deck, it is recommended that a maximum amplified sound level of 65 dBA be permitted. y: \jobs\20IOjobs\210029\r port\pinstrpes- edina- sound - level- assessment- d,a$2.doc Prepared for Cypress Equities by David Braslau-Associates, Inc. page 16 r C1, TER 7030 14D N i+SOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL GENERALLY 7030.0010 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. 7030.0020 DEFINITIONS. 7030.0030 NOISE CONTROL REQUIREMENT. 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS. 7030.0050 NOISE AREA CLASSIFICATION. 7030.0060 MEASU�tEMENT METHODOLOGY. 7030.0070 SOUND ATTENUATION MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY. 7030.0080 VARIANCE. 'MOTO'R VEMCLE NOISE LlNUTS 7030.1000 DEFINITION. 7030.1010 PROHIBITIONS. 7030.1020 SCOPE. 7030.1030 EXCEPTIONS. 7030.1040 NOISE LMT FOR VEHICLES OVER 10,000 POUNDS. 7030.1050 MOTOR VEHICLE NOISE LIMITS FOR MOTORCYCLES. 7030.1060 NOISE LINCTS FOR OTHER VEHICLES. GENERALLY 7030.0010 INCORPORATION BY REFEIZNCE. For the purpose of chapter 7030, American National Standards Institute, Specification for Sound Level Meters, S1.4 -1953 is incorporated by reference. This publication is available from the American National Standards Institute, 1430 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 100180 and can be found at: the offices of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 1935 West County Road B -2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113; the Government Documents Section, Room 409, Wilson Library, University of Minnesota, 309 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454; and the State of Minnesota Law Library, 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155. This document is not subject to frequent change. The Federal Highway Administration publication, Sound Procedures for Measuring Highway Noise: Final Report, FHWA- DP -45 -1R (August 1901) is incorporated by reference. This publication is available from the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1000 North Globe Road, Arlinb on, Virginia 22201 and can be found at: the offices of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 1935 West County Road B -2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113; the Government Documents Section, Room 409, Wilson Library, University of Minnesota, 309 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454; and the State of Minnesota Law Library, 25 Rev. Dr. Ivfartin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155. This document is not subject to frequent change. Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 43; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. Al Rishts Resented. ` '3, °'. 7030,0030 NOISE POLLUTION CONTI ROL 7030.0020 DEKNITIONS. Subpart 1. Application. The terms used in chapter 7030 have the meanings given them in this part. Subp. 2. A- weighted. "A- weighted" means a specific weighting of the sound pressure level for the purpose of determining the human response to sound. The specific weighting characteristics and tolerances are those given in American National Standards Institute S 1.4 -1983, section 5.1. Subp. 3. Daytime. "Daytime" means those hours from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Subp. 4. dR(A). "dB(A)" means a unit of sound level expressed in decibels (dB) and A- weighted. Subp. S. Decibel. "Decibel" means a unit of sound pressure level, abbreviated as dB. Subp. 6. Impulsive noise. "Impulsive noise" means either a single sound pressure peak (with either a rise time less than 200 milliseconds or total duration less than 200 milliseconds) or multiple sound pressure peaks (with either rise times Iess than 200 milliseconds or total duration less than 200 milliseconds) spaced at Ieast by 200 millisecond pauses. Subp. 7. L.,io. "L,o" means the sound level, expressed in dB(A), which is exceeded ten percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by, test procedures approved by the commissioner. Subp. °o. LJso° L .50 the sound Ievel, expressed in dB(A), which is exceeded 50 percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the commissioner. Subp. 9. Municipality. "Municipality" means a county; a city; a town; a regional planning and development commission established under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 473; the metropolitan council; or other governmental subdivision of the state responsible by law for controlling or restricting land use within its jurisdiction. Subp. 10. Nighttime. "Nighttime" means those hours from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 am. Subp. 11. Person. "Person" means any human being, any municipality or other. governmental or political subdivision or other public department or agency, any public or private corporation, any partnership, film, association, or other organization, any receiver, trustee, assignee, agency, legal entity, other than a court of law, or any legal representative of any of the foregoing, but does not include the agency. Subp. 12. Sound pressure level. "Sound pressure level ", in decibels, means 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure to the reference pressure. The reference pressure shall be 20 micronewtons per square meter. Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 43; L 1987 c 186 s 16; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 7030.0030 NOISE CONTROL REQ3UIREI,1ENT. No person may violate the standards established in part 7030.0040, unless exempted by Minnesota Statutes, section 116.07, subdivision 2a. Any municipality having authority to regulate land use shall take all reasonable measures within its jurisdiction to prevent the establishment of land use activities listed in noise area classification (NAC) 1; 2, or 3 in any location where the standards established in part 7030.0040 will be violated immediately upon establishment of the land use. 1� Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes; Stete of hlimesota All Rghts Reserved 0 3 Statutory Authority: JtE s 116.07 history: 11 SR 43; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 NOISE POLLUTION CONMOL 7030.0050 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS. Subpart 1. Scope. These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of public health and welfare. These standards are consistent with speech, sleep, annoyance, and hearing conservation requirements for receivers within areas grouped according to land activities by the noise area classification (NAC) system established in part 7030.0050. However, these standards do not, by themselves, identify the limiting levels of impulsive noise needed for the preservation of public health and welfare. Noise standards in subpart 2 apply to all sources. bp. 2. Noise standards. cise Area Classification 1 2 3 Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 History: 11 SR 13; 18 SR 614 Posted: December 12, 2003 7030.0050 NOISE AREA CLASSIFICATION. Daytime Nighttime L 5 L3o L'so 60 65 50 5c 65 70 65 7( 75 80 75 S( Subpart 1. Applicability.The noise area classification is based on the land use activity at the location of the receiver and determines the noise standards applicable to that land use activity unless an exception is applied under subpart 3. Subp. 2. Noise area classifications. The noise area classifications and the activities included in each classification are listed below: Noise Area Classification Land Use Activities 1 Household Units (includes farm houses) Group quarters Residential hotels QJ Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes; State of TZinnesota. All Rights Reserved. 7030.0050, )NOISE POLLUTION CONTRO1✓ Mobile home parks or courts Transient lodging Other residential Motion picture production Medical and other health services Correctional institutions Educational services Religious activities Cultural activities and nature exhibitions Entertainment assembly Camping and picnicking areas (designated) Resorts and group camps Other cultural, entertainment, and recreational activities. 2 Railroad terminals (passenger) .Railroad terminals (passenger and freight) Rapid rail transit and street railway passenger terminals Bus passenger terminals (intercity) Bus passenger terminals (local) Bus passenger terminals (intercity and local) Other motor vehicle transportation Airport and flying field terminals (passenger) Airport and flying field terminals (passenger and freight) Marine terminals (passenger) Marine terminals (passenger and freight) Automobile parking Telegraph message centers Transportation services and arrangements W1lolesale trade Retail trade — building materials, hardware, and farnl equipment Retail trade — general merchandise Retail trade — food Retail trade — automotive, marine craft, aircraft, and accessories Retail trade — apparel and accessories Retail trade — furniture, home furnishings, and equipment t Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Mhrmesota. All Rights Reserved. NOISE POLLUnON CONFFROL 70,30.0050 - s Retail trade — eating and drinking Other retail trade Finance, insurance, and real estate services Personal services Business services Repair services Legal services Other professional services Contract construction services Governmental services (except correctional institutions) Miscellaneous services (except religious activities) Public assembly (except entertainment assembly and race tracks) Amusements (except fairgrounds and amusement parks) Recreational activities (except designated camping and picnicking areas) Parks. 3 Food and kindred products — manufacturing Textile mill products — manufacturing . Apparel and other finished products made from fabrics, Ieather, and similar materials — manufacturing Lumber and wood products (except furniture) — manufacturing Furniture and fixtures — manufacturing Paper and allied products — manufacturing Printing, publishing, and allied industries Chemicals and allied products — manufacturing Petroleum refining and related industries Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products — manufacturing Stone, clay, and glass products — manufacturing Primary metal industries Fabricated metal products — manufacturing Professional, scientific, and controlling instruments; photographic and optical goods; watches and clocks — manufacturing Miscellaneous manufacturing (except motion picture production) Railroad, rapid transit, and street railway transportation (except passenger terminals) Motor vehicle transportation (except passenger terminals) Co P) Tight 02003 by The Revisor of Statutes. State of hIinnesota .411 Riah's Resery ad. 1� 7030.0050 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL Aircraft transportation (except passenger terminals) Marine craft transportation (except passenger and freight terminals) Highway and street right -of -way Communication (except telegraph message centers) Utilities Other transportation, communication, and utilities (except transportation services and arrangements) Race tracks Fairgrounds and amusement parks Agricultural Agricultural and related activities Forestry activities and related services (including commercial forest land, timber production, and other related activities) Fishing activities and related services Mining activities and related services Other resource production and extraction All other activities not othenvise listed. 4 Undeveloped and unused land area (excluding noncommercial forest development) Noncommercial forest development Water areas Vacant floor area Under construction Other undeveloped land and water areas. Subp. 3. Exceptions. The noise area classification for a land use may be changed in the following ways if the applicable conditions are met. A. The daytime standards for noise area classification 1 shall be applied to noise area classification I during the nighttime if the land use activity does not include overnight Iodging. B. The standards for a building in a noise area classification 2 shall be applied to a building in a noise area classification 1 if the following conditions are met: (1) the building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A); (2) the building has year -round climate control; and (3) the building has no areas or accommodations that are intended for outdoor activities. C. The standards for a building in a noise area classification 3 shall be applied to a building in a noise area classification 1 if the following conditions are met: Copyright 02003 by the Revisor of Statutes State of Atinnesota Al] Rigots Reserved. 6 City of Ediima Misdemeanors and Nuisances 1040.10 1040.08 Alarm Systems. No person shall permit an automatic fire alarm or intrusion alarm system under the person's control to emit, for period exceeding 20 minutes, an audible alarm which disturbs the comfort, quiet or repose of persons of normal sensibilities in the vicinity. 10410.09 Permit NecessaTy for Loudspeakers and Similar Devices. No person shall use or operate, or cause or allow to be used or operated, in any public street or place, or from any aircraft, or in front of or outside of any building, place or premises, or in or through any window, doorway or opening of such building, place or premises, abutting on or adjacent to any public street or place, any device, apparatus or instrument for the amplification of the human voice or any other sound or noise, or any other sound - making or sound - reproducing devices, without obtaining a permit from the City. Application for the permit shall be made to the Clerk on forms provided by the Clerk. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to permits issued under this Subsection and to the holders of such permits. The application shall require, among other information required by Section 160 of this Code, the hours and location of the proposed use, and the maximum volume (in decibels) of the proposed use. If the proposed use complies with the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code, the permit shall be granted. The fee for such permit shall be set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Subsequent violation of any provision of this Section or this Code by the permit holder shall be cause for revocation or suspension of the permit pursuant to Section 160 of this Code. This Subsection shall not apply to emergency vehicles or loudspeakers and similar devices used by the City. 1040.10 Participants as Violators. Any person on the premises or at the place from which any noise emanates which violates the provisions of this Section, and who is participating in the activity for which or from which the noise is being made, shall be deemed to be making, or allowing to be made, the noise in violation of this Section. History: Ord 1032 codified 1970; amended by 1032 -AI 8- 12 -81, 1032 -A2 9- 29 -82, 1032 -A3 9- 10-84; Ord 1995 -6 8- 17 -95; Ord 2007 -10, 06 -05 -07 Reference: Minnesota Rules, 1991, Chapter 7010 Cross Reference: Sections 160, 185 1040 - 3 t� �� CITY OF EDINA 4901 WEST 50' STREET DalaoRalh EDINA, MN 55424 tVPD 952 -927 -9961 b/Cb* Application for Loudspeaker Perlmit 1120.4137 Fee: $21.00 The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Edina, Minnesota, as a request to permit the use of loudspeaker (s) on the outside of a structure in accordance with Edina City code 1040 and any amendments thereto: NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: (City, State, Zip) Phone Number: Organization (if any Location of Requested Use: Description of Event:: Date (s) Permit Requested: From (hours) To Maximum Volume (In Decibels) (The maximum allowed by Code is 65 decibels no more than 10% of the time in one hour period of time (6 minutes) and no more than 60 decibels for more than 50% of the time in a one hour period.) THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this forr Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data. to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be.processed. finder MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number or Social Security Number. This information may be used to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your license if you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties, or interest. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Intemal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, the State of Minnesota Driver License Section, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, and Ramsey County Warrant Office. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. Your residence address and telephone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an altemative address and telephone number. Please sign below to indicate that you have read this notice: Signature X private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address request that my residence address and telephone number be considered Telephone Applicant agrees to the following: 1. That this loudspeaker permit is solely for use at the time requested above. 2. All noise shall cease at 10:00 p.m. or upon receipt of a complaint of excess noise and subsequent determination of violation by a Police Officer. 3. That the use of a loudspeaker without a permit is a violation of Edina City Code 1040 as amended. 4. If for a new use, all residents living within a 200 -foot radius have been contacted and do not object to the use of a loudspeaker. 5. The applicant will be responsible for supervising and controlling any persons operating amplifiers or loudspeaker equipment. Date: Approved copy to Applicant (date) Revised 12- 22 -2DD9 X Signature of Applicant Approved copy to P.D. ,It-3b IC:v1,liLss EQUITIES An �IIIIMIr r•1 Nnrl�rrh Ilelrll trrrlr er BNAALVIE 11nNE I A'A: �E DISTRICT nCTAII_ f n[STAUIIANT Edina, Minnesota a, I/r SITE PLAN RA IIiLFnIMn, br.. Master Site Plan Gnrnl fuliml It fnn•II Archllerl. . N. CY1,1(uss CQU17'1m5 a. Wil-.11 s..ui..dr -.115-1 ... THE DISTRICT RETAIL RESTAURANT Edina, Minnesota h1cullIdn Iwnll hook Ouurhdur, hm. South EIeYquQD 14-11LIImr X I IUdd1,, 1. 22 -?.000 �_OIo_1 residential tower from this project, adding he is a- bit disappointed in the retail element of the p.rojeet-. Mr. Rohlf said in iris opinion the existing Centennial Lakes retail area is not successful, pointing out, a number -of store fronts are vacant and businesses appear to continually move in aid out. Concluding, Mr. Rohif said his concern is with the location of the',parking ramp. COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT' Mr. Kirk Williams, commented -Chet given the location and size of the site whatever is considered and con strbcted will be dense. Mr. Williams asked the Commission to review this plan ort its own merits. Acting Chair Fischer closed pPublic comments. COMMENTS FR6M THE COMMISSION, Commissioners continued to express their reluctance to amend the code. Commissioners recognized that Centennial Lakes is a gem within the City of Edina'; and the suggestion to amend the code during the = -Comprehensive Plan. amendment stage seems premature. Confusion was also expressed that it appears this site is being required to "make up for the ills of the past ", and the proposed amendment to the code coniing at the same time as the request for final development only enforces that appearance. Commissioners also observed any redevelopment in the district should be considered witF;the whole and each proposal should be looked at individually. ACTIONS BY THE COMMISSION: Commissioner Brown moved td-recommend denial of the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to deny carried. P-07 -2 Final Development Plan Cypress Equities 7311 France Avenue Mr. Teague presented his staff report informing the Commission the applicant is proposed to tear down the old AMC theatre building and construct a 31,000 square foot single level retail building (along France) and a 22,000 square foot retail building with a five level parking ramp above and to the south a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. The total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. 7 t�3 �� residential tower from this project, adding he is a bit disappointed in the retail . element of the project. Mr. Pohif said in his opinion the existing Centennial Lakes retail area is not successful, pointing out a number of store fronts are vacant and businesses appear to continually move in and out. Concluding, Mr. Rohlf said his concern is with the location of the parking ramp. COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT: Mr. Kirk Williams, commented that given the location and size of the site whatever is considered and constructed will be dense. Mr.. Williams asked the Commission to review this plan on its own merits. Acting Chair Fischer closed public comments. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners continued to express their reluctance to amend the code. Commissioners recognized,that Centennial Lakes is a gem within the City of Edina, and the suggestion to amend the code. during the Comprehensive Plan amendment stage seems premature. Confusion was also expressed that it appears this site is being required to "make up for the ills of the past", and the proposed amendment to the code coming at the same time as the request for final development only enforces that appearance. Commissioners also observed any redevelopment in the district should be considered with the whole and each proposal should be looked at individually. ACTIONS BY THE COMMISSION: Commissioner Brown moved to recommend denial of the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to deny carried. P -07 -2 Final Development Plan Cypress Equities 7311 France Avenue Mr. Teague presented his staff report informing the Commission the applicant is proposed to tear down the old AMC theatre building and construct a 31,000 square foot single level retail building (along France) and a 22,000 square foot retail building with a five level parking ramp above and to the south a 32,960 square foot two -level retail /restaurant. The total square footage of both buildings is 86,000 square feet. � A4 Mr. Teague explained the request requires an amendment of the overall Centennial Lakes Faster Llano and a Final Development Plan. Mr. Teague concluded staff recommends approval to the Master Development Plan and Final Development Plan approval based on the following findings: Approval is based on the following findings: 1 } The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. and subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: ® Site plan date stamped April 4, 2007. o Grading plan date stamped April 4, 2007. o Building elevations date stamped April 4, 2007. 2) Final grading, drainage and utility plans, submitted with the building permit, are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 3) Providing storm water best management practices on site and submission of plans and specifications to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 4) Execution of a developer's agreement. 5) Dedication of a transit easement across the property. 6) A cross access easement is required to allow access to 7373 France Avenue, property to the south. 7) Submission of proof of permission (easements) to City Engineer from the owner of 7235 France Avenue to access 7311 France Avenue across their property; or 8) Submission of plans and specifications to Hennepin County Engineer for work completed with County right -of -way; 9) Agreement to provide a signal agreement and roadway modification permits with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of a building permit. R 8 10) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping, that dies. ' 11) Receipt of Executed amendment to existing covenants agreement addressing park maintenance assessment if trees are allowed to be removed in the park. Submission of plans and specifications to Park Director for any proposed work to City park property for approval. 12) The Centennial Lakes paths must remain open and usable throughout the construction of the project. 13) The bituminous pathway must be milled and overlaid. 14) Developer must prepare plans for covering and reducing sound of the outdoor delivery area; and regulate delivery time to reduce nuisance effects to adjoining properties. 15) No amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants. 16) Approvals do not include any signage. Separate sign permits would be required for any signage. Signs that do not meet the sign ordinance would require variances. APPEARING FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr. Brett Witzig and Mr. Kirk Williams, Cypress Equities and Mr. Farrell of Good, Fulton, Farrell and Ms. Kathy O'Connell, MFRA. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners expressed concern over the location of the proposed parking ramp, ramp lighting, exterior building materials (ramp), and the landscaping and screening elements of the project (especially as they relate to the park). Commissioners also raised questions on easements along France Avenue and Gallagher Drive and if those easements were established as Right - of -Way ( ROW) would building setbacks become an issue if the ROW were expanded. Discussion from the Commission also focused on the mixed -use aspect of the project with the majority of the Commissioners indicating they didn't feel the project as proposed met the requirements of the current ordinance as it relates to the mixed -use zoning district. Commissioners also acknowledged their concern that the current project doesn't provide a residential element (mixing the uses). Commissioner Risser observed that regardless of the overall development plan or code requirements Centennial Lakes was developed with the residential element east of the lake, adding she also observed there is no residential 4 9 element on the east side of France Avenue. Planner Teague acknowledged that statement was correct. Planner Teague pointed out Centennial Lakes was developed in phases and at that time city staff believed amending the overall development plan was the best way to proceed. Mr. Teague reiterated the present city attorney believes the best way to resolve the non- conforminity that currently exists at Centennial Lakes would be to amend the code. COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT: Mr. Wittig told the Commission lighting on the proposed ramp is down -lit and should not spill onto the residential properties. Mr. Wittig acknowledged the potential for right -of -way taking by the County; however, at this time that component is unknown. Mr. Farrell, informed the Commission Cypress Equities held a neighborhood meeting informing neighbors of this proposal. With graphics Mr. Farrell pointed out the plan, including landscaping materials, building materials on the retail buildings and ramp to include the use of louvers., parking, traffic . circulation, lighting and signage aspects of the project to including "art" along the vilest elevation of the building. SPEAKING FROM THE PUBLIC Mr. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, told the Commission he supports the project. He added the project is better than looking at a brick wall, and the proposed louver materials used on the ramp are a good choice of materials. Mr. Robert Rohlf, 7400 Edinborough Way, expressed concern over the retail component of the project noting there already is a vacant restaurant in the Centennial Lakes retail shops. Mr.. Rohif stated it isn't much fun walking past vacant store fronts. Mr. Peter Jarvis, 1016 Coventry Place, stated he believes what is proposed is superior to the existing theatre. Mr. Jarvis said he believes any lighting problem would be solved by the exterior louver system on the parking ramp. Acting Chair Fischer closed the public comments. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners continued to express concern over the lack of a residential component with this project, and the relationship of the parking ramp to the park area. Commissioners stated they highly support the mixed -use element of the code, adding in the majority's opinion this proposal doesn't achieve that element. Commissioners also expressed concern that the proposed signage, especially 10 the use of mart" along the building wail may not comply with the sign code. Commissioners acknowledged the position their lack of enthusiasm for the project places the applicants in; however, could not see their way to approve the project as submitted. ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION- Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend denial of the Final Development Plan and Amendment to the Overall Development Plan for Cypress Equities noting the following findings - the proposed development is not in conformance with the current ordinance; the proposed development is not mixed - use; the proposed development does not take advantage of the public park; questions remain on ramp placement, materials used on the ramp, public safety concerns, signage considerations and lighting issues. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Brown, Schroeder, Staunton, Scherer, Fischer. Nays; Risser. Motion carried. Ili. INTERGOVERNMENTAL SIJSINES.S_:. - -- Edin AS A Fit City 1? Acting Cfjair Fischer told the Commission since Edina is .paicipating in being a "Fit Cit)l«y he has thought a lot about how to become.;; ".better fit" himself. Continuing, Acting Chair Fischer said he considered biking as one option; however, he though that as a group t6d Com.missio aF ould continue to look at Edina and find ways to achieve a heaAy living- --s—i dard for all Edina residents. Acting Chair Fischer pointed out mixed= use-afeas are areas where residents could walk to amenities instead of being tied to their vehicles. Acting Chair Fischer said the Comprehensive..Ptan i6 also a good tool to use to implement healthy living through the biro task force, etc. Continuing, Acting Chair Fischer said he also came p witl tithe idea of Commissioners taking a walking tour of the Greater Southdale Area:` ,Jk Scherer stated she thinks the waiking -tour is a great idea and further suggesi that Commissioners could also walk either as a group or lndividuaiiY-different areas of the City toy test pedestrian friendliness. Concluding, Commis §ioner Scharer said another idea that came to ber-would: be; to walk . - ti r Ediina's city parks Commissioner Schroeder suggested as part of the Comprehensive Plan that the city include an element on "healthy living ". Commissioner Schroeder agreed with Acting Chair Fischer's suggestion that incorporating "healthy living" into the Comp Plan is a good idea and suggested that the Commission invite a guest to a Comp Plan task force meeting that could speak to the Commission on what it takes to be a "fit city". Planner Teague responded those are great ideas, . 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING O Paae 2 of 8 Mr. eague noted the original master development plan called for 1,085 dwelling units and 1,506155V squar feet of non - residential uses. The zoning ordinance was drafted to fit the original master pl ; howev , actual development includes 348 dwelling units and 1,217,935 square feet of non -resi ntial uses. He oted that strict interpretation of the ordinance would require any redevelopment to strictly residentia order to comply with the original master plan and zoning. Mr. Teague expl ' d the applicant re uested the requested ordinance amendment to bring the site into compliance: e added staff recommende approval of the proposed amendment; however., he noted the Planning Commission recommended anal of the amendment. The Council aske questions gathering further understanding of the issue incl9ding the following: noting Without the amen \thneed dditional non - residential uses may be built; argas within the MDD -6 District likely to be redevelok at as two issues; short term fix with amen#nent; long -term as part of Comp Plan Update; expressed considering an ordinance change and final development plan at the same meeting; a for looking at more than the MDD ,6 District during the Comp Plan Update. Public Comment Laurie Miller, representing Cyp ss Equities spyinfa of the proposed amendment. Sharon Ming, 1103 Coventry Place, tated she e Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the ordinance amendment. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, suppo • d e proposed amendment. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, Member Swenson made a motion, s conded by Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, S, enson, Hovl Motion carried. / proposed amendment. Masica closing the public hearing. The Council discussed the roposed amendment. The is as discussed included: concern over considering an ordinanc amendment at the same meeting s a redevelopment proposal; realization the issue must be address . fairness to developers; applauding laming Commission's concern for housing, and develo ment of a vision for Southdale area. Follo/econded lie comment, the Council discussed the matter. Member Masica made a motion grantding and waiving second reading to 0rdinan e No. 2007 -09 amending Section 1350 o Code regarding non-residential Boor area in a MDD -6 District. Member Beane the motion. Rollc Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland Swenson )n carried. RESOLUTION N®. 2007 -63 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN — CYPRESS EQUITIES — OLD AMC TREATER SITE Affidavits of publication were presented and placed on file. Mr. Teague explained Cypress Equities proposed to tear down the old 40,000 square foot AMC Movie Theater and build a 31,000 square foot single level retail building along France Avenue and a 22,000 square foot retail building with a five -level parking ramp above. Attached to the south would be a �nnnnnincrt - - L...__ < /7A /701 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING © Page 3 of S 32,960 square foot two -level retail/restaurant. Mr. Teague said the total square footage would 56,000 square feet. He noted this was a revision without the residential tower of the project proposed for the site in 2006. Mr. Teague stated the redevelopment request would require the following actions: an amendment of the overall Master Plan and a Final Development Plan. He continued stating the staff felt the proposal was reasonable because: the proposed uses would be permitted in the MDD -6 District; the project would encourage pedestrian movement; the project met zoning ordinance regulations; and the proposed retail use was generally consistent with the original master development plan. Mr. Teague reported the Planning Commission recommended denial of the amendment to the master development plan and final development plan for the site at 7311 France Avenue with the following Findings: • The proposed development is not in conformance with current ordinance. • The proposed development is not mixed -use. The proposed development does not take advantage of the public park. • The location of the ramp adjacent to the lake. • The commission was not satisfied with the materials used on the parking ramp. • Public safety concern regarding on -site circulation. • Concern signage and lighting. Mr. Teague stated staff recommended approval of the amendment to the master development plan and final development plan at 7311 France Avenue for Cypress Equities because the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. He stated the following conditions of the approval: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: . . . • Site plan date stamped April 4, 2007- date changed to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council • Grading plan date stamped April 4, 2007. • Building elevations date stamped April 4, 2007 - date change to June 5, 2007 plan submitted to Council. 2. Final grading, drainage and utility plans, submitted with the building permit, are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 3. Providing storm water best management practices on site and submission of plans and specifications to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 4. Execution of a developer's agreement. 5. Dedication of a transit easement across the property. 6. A cross access easement is required to allow access to 7373 France Avenue, property to the south. 7. Submission of proof of permission (easements) to City Engineer from the owner of 7235 France Avenue to access 7311 France Avenue across their property; or S. Submission of plans and specifications to Hennepin County Engineer for work completed with County right -of -way; 9. Agreement to provide a signal agreement and roadway modification permits with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 11. Receipt of executed amendment to existing covenants agreement addressing park maintenance assessment if trees are allowed to be removed in the park. Submission of plans and specifications to Park Director for any proposed work to City park property for approval. 12. The Centennial Lakes paths must remain open and usable throughout the construction of the project. 13. The bituminous pathway must be milled and overlaid. �4 -_i AF_-a___1A._--.....innn7nCf)ZT) __ 1.+_ <11) ni1) n10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR 1\IEETING 0 Page 4 of 8 14. Developer must prepare plans for covering and reducing sound of the outdoor delivery area and regulate delivery time to reduce nuisance effects to adjoining properties. 15. No amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants. 16. Approvals do not include any signage. Separate sign permits would be required for any signage. Signs that do not meet the sign ordinance would require variances. Developer Presentation David Farrell, 9444 Sherwood Glen, Dallas, Texas, Good Fulton and Farrell, Architects for the project presented the revised project using a graphic power point and description. He walked through the site plan, the elevations from north east, south and west, the shadow studies and the proposed landscaping. plans. Mr. Farrell responded to Council's specific questions and also introduced Kirk Williams, Vice President of Cypress Development, who also responded to specific questions regarding the proposed redevelopment. Council questions included the location of valet parking, the location of the loading area in the parking structure, which plan was the one that would actually be built, why there was no parking under the retail structure, potential tenants of the project, whether the retail would be one or two stories, and why the parking was proposed at the current level. Public Comment John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, supported the redevelopment project as proposed. Gene Persha, 800 Coventry Place, supported the redevelopment project as proposed. JoEllen Deever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, supported the project as proposed. Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Place, asked what type of retail was proposed. Wanda Frazier, 7340 York Avenue, asked if the restaurants would be locally owned or large franchises. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, closing the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following the public comment, the Council discussed the matter. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2006 -63 and moved its adoption, seconded by Member Bennett, granting Final Development Plan to Cypress Equities for the old AMC Theater Site on France Avenue with the sixteen conditions noted earlier by Mr. Teague, plus- noting the site and elevation glans shall be dated dune 5, 2007, the project shall be built with materials as shown on the plans and specs, and the parking structure shall have louvers on all four sides with the north side elevation architectural details and augmented landscaping acceptable to Edina city staff . Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland Nay: Swenson -� Motion carried. Motion made by Me offish anc sec 65 approving the Final Plat for Motion carried on r o e— five ayes. A4? Member Masica adopting Resolution No. 2007 - M, 5901 France Avenue. T- - 41)A1)01n June 23, 2010 Edina Planning Commission: Michael Fischer, Chairman Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Arlene Forrest Floyd Grabiel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer Michael Schroeder Kevin Staunton Re: Public Hearlu June 30. Reauest to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment to faster Plan and Final Development Plan, Cypress Equities" I respectfully request that the Planning Commission reject Applicant's June 11, 2010 request to eliminate Condition 415, "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants ", for the following reasons: 1) Applicant's ,tune 11 request was not timely. Requests for consideration at June 30 Planning Commission meeting were due May 28 per City of Edina Planning Department web site. 2) Applicant's June 11 request is incomplete. Revised elevations reflecting contemplated building changes not included with June 11 request. Wood Burning Fireplace(s) - "... take in the attractive smells of natural firewood from its outdoor fireplace." (Kirk Williams May 31, 2010 letter to City Council, page 1.) Sliding Glass Walls - " ... we are still open to erecting a full length (from floor to ceiling) glass wall at the balcony corridors as earlier proposed, but only in response to the City of Edina allowing for outdoor amplified music for outside enclosed and/or non - enclosed areas." (Kirk Williams June 10, 2010 letter to Cary Teague, page 2, accompanying Applicant's June 11 request.) 3) Nothing in applicant's June 11 request proAdes support for allowing sound amplification. The City Council's June 5, 2007 approval of the Cypress Equities Final Development Plan contemplated a -hvo -level fine dining restaurant(s). Prohibiting amplified sound for outdoor restaurants was consistent with Council's recognition that the restaurant(s) would adjoin a City Park and was close to the many residences directly across the North Pond from the restaurant building. These facts remain unchanged. Sincerely, John E Bohan 800 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 952- 921 -0338 cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague, City Planner Roger Knutson, City Attorney 6/23/2010 11:18 AM (% %Wp 6 -- ---7z - 4 U U Ink __ 1 Suite 308, 7500, York Avenue South, EDINA, Minnesota 55435 -4700. 21 June, 2010 city of Edina Planning Department- Dear Sirs, Further to your notice of 18 June, 2010, Re:- cypress Equities Development at Trot 1, Block 1, 7311 France Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota R- q'uest:- kme-nd Resolution No 2007 -63 .... elLmanate #15 e e o . "No Amp!4cation is allowed for outdoor restaurants " The above request is very distressing. There are many, many residences in the immediate area of this proposed development and the owners of these would, most certainly, be disturbed during the Spring, Summer and early Autumn months. At these times we wish to enjoy our gardens and the natural sounds of the outdoors - not hear over amplified (for sure, it would be so) music. It should also be noted that within the same area there is a Senior residence with a Memory Care Section (Walker Elder Suites) and a new, similar establishment for the Edina Community is Ding constructed by Ebenezer at present (York Gardens), Imagine dear souls suffering from Dementia or Alzheimer's Disease being'outside (or indoors with windows own) and assaulted through all the daylight hours by loud `music' (strange sounds to them). Shat will it do to their health ? The new building, York Gardens, is also to have Care Suites in addition to Memory Care and Assisted Living accommodation .... should very sick /dying people in these Care Suites be subjected to such infringement on their lives and privacy ? Now consider the clients at the proposed new development; presumably a restaurant. Not all who frequent these businesses enjoy excess noise all around them during a meal. How often do people REALLY listen to the 'canned' music while eating ? All this amplification does is make everyone speak louder in order to be heard. This I have noted in such situations and the result spoils the whole dining experience. Gentle, subdued, low volume music indoors is fine, if absolutely necessary, but outdoors and more highly amplified, ND ! This for the reasons given. PIT,j-� fully consider the needs of the large number of people living within earshot of the proposed new development and the effects to these,as opposed to the lesser number who would be clients and do NOT amend Resolution Noe 2007 -63 by eliminating #15. Thank you for this consideration. Yours faithfully, ���;(► Jacqueline B. Lindman (Mrs) JacWe Hoogenakker From: Mark Johnson <baseballbooks @comcast.net> Seca: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:41 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Eliminating no amplification for a proposal from Cypress Equities We received your notice concerning the request of Cypress Equities to eliminate the "no amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants." Your communication on this issue is very poor. You need to be more specific in your notice. What proposed outdoor restaurant are you talking about? We don't know what is located at 7311 France Av S? We don't know anything about the applicant, Cypress Equities. Is this located near the three eateries located on France Avenue? Why not include a map showing the exact location. Your notices have a commercial tone. We don't know what that legal description represents. Could you please write this notice as you would if writing and explaining this to your own mother? Would she understand this notice? The EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION needs some lessons in communicating with it's citizens. Fac Nunc (Do it now). Thank you. Mark and Thelma Johnson 7500 York Av S Edina, MN 55435 1 )� c�.� FP Cary Teaaue From: Dianne Plunkett Latham < Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:45 AM To: Kris Aaker, Jackie Hoogenakker, Arlene Forrest; Cary Teague; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter, Joyce Repya; Julie Risser, Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer, Michael Schroeder, Nancy Nyrop Scherer, Stephen Brown Subject: FW: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace 6 -11 -10 Dear City of Edina Planning Commissioners, Please take into consideration the following when you receive requests for restaurants with wood burning fireplaces. Dianne Plunkett Latham From., Dianne Plunkett Latham [mailto: Dianne .Plunkett.Latham @Comcast.net] Berta, Monday, May 31, 2010 8:26 AM Too Ann Swenson (SwensonAnnl @GMail.com); James B. Hovland ()Hovland @KrauseRollins.com); Joni Bennett (3oniBennett129comcast.net); Mary Brindle (mbrindle@Com cast. net); Scot Housh (Scot.Housh @Willis.com) Subject: Opposition Restaurant's Wood burning Fireplace 5 -31 -10 Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has recently added a new step to the GreenStep Cities program, that of Local Air Quality. Due to the hazards of wood smoke to human health, to the global environment, and to our urban forest, the Air and Water Quality Working Group (AEWG) of the Energy and Environment Commission has been studying issues related to wood smoke. Although the AEWG report on wood smoke is not yet final, I am taking the opportunity to pass along some data on wood smoke, which AEWG member, Julie Mellum has provided. I am doing so because it is my understanding that at the June 1 City Council meeting, a local restaurant will be requesting having a two story wood burning fire place. I am writing to request that City Council disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. Gas inserts for indoor fireplaces and outdoor fire rings are safer and more environmentally sound then bunting wood. Wood smoke: 1, Is hazardous to human health. 2. Is a major source of carbon dioxide and black carbon soot in our atmosphere. 3 , Contributes to the spread of insect -borne tree disease, such as emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease. Human Health - Wood smoke emits fine particulates that contain many of the same deadly toxins that are in tobacco smoke and vehicle exhaust. They are comprised of formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, dioxins and other noxious and persistent organic pollutants that build up in our lungs, crops and water supply. Wood smoke is more concentrated than tobacco smoke, travels farther and remains chemically active in the body longer. Everyone is at risk from wood -smoke exposure. But children of all agesill, unbom children, the elderly, and anyone with asthma, allergies, or heart disease are in the highest -risk categories. The US Center for Disease Control states that wood smoke is a trigger for asthma attacks. Wood smoke is also implicated in cancers; reproductive birth defects and in sudden �2� infant death syndrome. A study found that people who bum wood or other "biofuels" for heat or cooking may have a heightened risk of emphysema and related lung conditions. Among non - smokers, exposure to biomass smoke was linked to a 2.5 -fold increase in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smokers exposed to biomass smoke, meanwhile, had a more than four -fold greater risk of COPD than non - smokers who did not bum biomass fuels at home. 131 Minnesota's antismoking ordinance allows people to go to bars and restaurants and avoid smoke, because tobacco smoke has a proven harmful effects. Yet residents have no choice but to breathe outdoor air that smells of wood smoke in most neighborhoods and in public spaces —at all times of day, in all seasons. It can even enter homes through windows, vents and cracks. i 41 Wood smoke interferes with the right to use and enjoy one's own property. 31aclk Carbon Soot - The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to set limits on black carbon, a/k/a "soot." Generated from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, black carbon is a solid particle that warms the atmosphere because its dark color absorbs heat -- both when it accumulates in the air, raising the air's temperature, and when it lands on snow and ice, accelerating melting. Black carbon. also has profound effects on public health, causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year. 151 Forestry Issues - Gas fireplaces and gas fire rings reduce the number of trees that must be destroyed for fuel; trees help absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. The head of the United Nations Environment Program is pushing for measures to slash non - carbon dioxide greenhouse gas pollutants, including black carbon, "because they make up some 50 percent of toxic atmospheric emissions". He stressed that "The world must deploy all available means to reduce this pollution and that no substance contributing to this pollution should be overlooked." [6j The movement of firewood contributes to the spread of tree pathogens. Emerald ash borer will soon be killing trees in Edina. According to a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) document, "America's neighborhoods are under attack. The emerald ash borer lives in firewood. Move firewood and you spread the destruction." i'1 Reducing wood burning in Edina will reduce the use of firewood and thereby reduce the spread of emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease as well as any other pathogen that could be spread via firewood. In summary _ Please disallow the request for this restaurant's wood burning fire place and require instead a gas burning fire place. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. f" Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009-/11/091106D84243,htm. 2 "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 3 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: /ibun:ingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /vieNvtopic.php ?f =11&t =3497. 4 "Facts about burning wood, Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 5 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/ center /articles /2010/los- angeles- times- 02 -22- 2010.html. 6 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un. org/apps /news /story.asp ?News1D = 31952 &Cr=unep &Crl). ' Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Dianne Plunkett Latham Member Air and Water Quality Working Group Edina Energy and Environment Commission W Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2DD9/11/091106084243.htm. 121 "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. 151 New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: //bumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?f--11 &t =3497. 1 4] "Facts about burning wood; Health effects of wood smoke ", Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Pub. No. 30 -17, Nov, 2002. 151 Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, bttp:Hwm�,.biologicaldiversit),.org/neA,s/center/articles/-?01 0/los-angeles-times-02-22- 20 1 0.html. 161 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org /apps /news / story.asp ?NewsII3 = 31952 &Cr— mnep &Crl). 171 Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Jovoe Reova From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:54 Pik To: Joyce Repya Subject: FW: Heritage Preservation Board Hi there, Can you help this person ?? Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 \hwv. cityofed i n a. corn From. The4Square @aol.com [mailto:The4Square @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:48 PM Too Lynette Biunno Subject: Heritage Preservation Board I am a live in Edina and do not want item #15 eliminated from the property at 7311 France Ave. South. We don,t need any more noise at a respected restaurant. Please follow the Edina request Vernon J Wegner 7220 York. Ave.So. Edina,MN 55435 952 831 5180 Eli 1 1111M= -I i Jackie H®®genakker From: EVIE WILLIAMS <evie423 @mailstation.com> Seat: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:08 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: Cypress Equities Request to amend No.2007 -63 I own a Condo at 7220 York Ave. So, #423 Edina. I feel strongly that #15 in their Master Development Plan, at 7311 France Ave. South in Edina, allowing no amplification for outdoor restaurants, ------------------------------------- should remain in place. There are many condos and apartments that would be effected from the noise of the restaurant crowd which would carry across the lake in the late evening hours. Evelyn 0 Williams, home owner. Roo' E-1 Jackie Hoogenekker From: J RONALD BOE <fredmcboe @msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:32 PM 4Q: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: #15 This is in response to your mailing re eliminating #15. We definitely object to eliminating #15 and allowing amplification for outdoor restaurants. That is such a beautiful part of Edina - -- please don't ruin it with noise from commercialism. Ronald and Mary Boe 7200 York Ave So #110 Edina, Mn 55435 E E1 )ackle HeogienaaB ker From: ROBT L ANDERSON <arobaud @msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:49 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: outdoor amplification To City of Edina Planning Department, We are NOT in favor of outdoor amplification for outdoor restaurants. That would ruin our nice parkH Robert and Audrey Anderson 7220 York Ave S #410 Jackie H000e¢ akker FLro m: Herb Froemming <herb.froemming @prodigy.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:24 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File: 2010.0005 -- Cypress Equities My property address is: 911 Coventry Place, Edina, i1AN 55435 I am against eliminating #15 — "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from resolution No. 2007.63. Residents in the area purchased their property with the expectation of Quiet Enjoyment. With the waters of Centennial Lakes between the South Edina Development Addition and the Coventry Townhomes, any amplification of music or other sounds would carry across the waters and represent a great disturbance to the peaceful enjoyment of the residents in the Coventry and represents something not existent when these properties were purchased. I am definitely against any amplification of sounds in the area. Herbert Froemming Jackie C eogenakker From: john harris <jharris331 @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:17 AID To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Rousty Harris Subject: Case File 2010.0005- Cypress Equities Dear Reader, This is in response to the notice that we recently received regarding Cypress Equities' request that amplification of sound be permitted for outdoor restaurants at 7311 France Avenue. We have been Edina residents for 48 years and now own a townhome in Coventry at Centennial Lakes. While we have not objected to the proposed restaurant /entertainment project at the Cypress Equities site on France Avenue, we strongly object to the proposal that outdoor sound amplification be permitted because of the certainty that the many residents in and near Centennial Lakes will be adversely impacted and deprived of the peaceful enyoyment of their homes. It is important to note that a combination of the lake and our prevailing westerly winds will cause the noise emanating from the Cypress site to be very easily heared by those in the Centennial Lakes area whose homes are to the east of the Cypress site. We speak from experience on this subject because we also own a home in Hawaii which is located downwind from a large hotel that conducts amplified outdoor musical programs several times each week. The sound from these events carries well over a quarter of a mile downwind and each word spoken or sung at the hotel's events can be distinctly heard at our home and those nearby. It would be unfair and highly inappropriate for those of us at Centennial Lakes who regularly contribute to the maintenance of this important park area to be subjected to similar unwanted noise far into each evening. Thereforte we ask that Cypress Equities' request be denied. John and Rousty Harris 713 Coventry Lane Edina, MN 55435 (952) 921 -0314 JacWe Hoogenakker From: john harris <jharris331 @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9.:52 AM To;: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010.0005- Cypress Equities Dear Reader, This is in response to the notice that we recently received regarding Cypress Equities' request that amplification of sound be permitted for outdoor restaurants at 7311 France Avenue. We have been Edina residents for 48 years and now own a townhome in Coventry st Centennial Lakes. While we do not and have not objected to the proposed restaurant /entertainment project at thecypress Equities cite on France Avenue, we strongly object to the proposal thatsound amplification be permitted Jackie Hoo enakker From. prehkamp @starpoint.net Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:41 PM To: jhoogenakkeer @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: 2010.0005 Thank you for the opportunity for my input. I'll be out of town on June 30th. We moved into Coventry 2 years ago because of the wonderful , quiet and very pretty park and surrounding area. I understand commerical development will happen but it should fit the neighborhood it goes into. In Minnesota we have a limited time to enjoy the parks and outdoors and having amplified sound will only detract from that special time and our home. Please don't amend Resolution fro. 2007 -63. Thankyou Paul & Marcia Rehkamp 903 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 507 - 829 -9756 1 Jackie Ho® enakker From: Nancy & Dick Nylander <nylander51@msn.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 12:48 PM So: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File: 2010.0005 We are against outdoor amplification at the 7311 France Ave, location. We live on the north side of the 7400 Edinborough Way condominium and such amplification would effect our location a great deal. A compromise might be to allow amplification before 7e pm, but after that it would become quite a nuisance. Nancy and Dick Nylander 7400 Edinborough Way #5107 Edina, MN 55435 -5614 952 -841 -0897 Jackie Hoo enakker From: Hokkanen, Eileen M. (MN10) <Eileen. Hokkanen @Honeywell.com> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:36 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities' request I received a Public Hearing Notice regarding Cypress Equities' request to eliminate the prohibition against amplification for outdoor restaurants. I have several concerns about eliminating this prohibition. There are homes in close proximity to the development that could be disturbed by this music. There is no indication as to whether or not there would be "rules" around the lifting of this prohibition — rules as to when the music could be played, or what kind of music or at what volume. Sound carries, particularly in the evening, and music from the restaurant could be disruptive to nearby homeowners as well as people in the area who are enjoying the lake. I walk the Centennial Lakes' paths, and I very much enjoy the classical music that is piped along the path. It is low volume and "non- intrusive ". I would not want music from the restaurants to disturb that experience. Nor would I want that music competing with the concerts that are held during the summer. If the Council is going to approve amplification for outdoor restaurants, I would hope there would be requirements as to type of music and volume with consideration given to those around the lake who are not at the restaurants. Eileen Hokkanen 7310 York Ave S #101 Edina, MN 55435 952 -830 -1588 Jackie Hooger akker From: Mark Johnson <baseballbooks @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:41 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Eliminating no amplification for a proposal from Cypress Equities We received your notice concerning the request of Cypress Equities to eliminate the "no amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants." Your communication on this issue is very poor. You need to be more specific in your notice. What proposed outdoor restaurant are you talking about? We don't know what is located at 7311 France Av S? We don't know anything about the applicant, Cypress Equities. Is this located near the three eateries located on France Avenue? Why not include a map showing the exact location. Your notices have a commercial tone. We don't know what that legal description represents. Could you please write this notice as you would if writing and explaining this to your own mother? Would she understand this notice? The EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION needs some lessons in communicating with it's citizens. Fac Nunc (Do it now). Thank you. Mark and Thelma Johnson 7500 York Av S Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackbe Hoo enakker From: Anne Marie Gromme <amgromme @mac.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:52 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Anne Marie Gromme Subject: #15 re: case file 2010.0005 It is hard for me to understand why the planning commission would even consider this proposal. The residents around Centennial Lakes purchased their properties based on, among other things, the fact that this is primarily a residential neighborhood. We already have nice quiet music piped tastefully and directionally through the speakers around the lake during daytime hours. What we do not need or want is additional music, of some eatery's choosing carrying across the water into our homes. Please vote no to the amendment to_ Resolution N. 2007.63 proposed by Cypress Equities. That resolution was endorsed for a very good reason. A question to you is: Why do we have to keep revisiting these issues, many of which have been put into place relatively recently? Cypress Equities is constantly testing you, the commission, and us, the neighborhood. Why do you put up with that? Where is it written that we have to with their proposals every few months? Anne Marie Gromme 602 Coventry Lane Edina 55435 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Wendy Amundson <wramundson @aol.com> Sent:: Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:26 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities request This is in response to the Public Hearing Notice mailed last week regarding Cypress Equities' request to eliminate the prohibition against amplification for outdoor restaurants. With homes directly across from the development that could be disturbed by the noise, I don't think this is an appropriate situation to grant a variance. I think all of us who walk Centennial Lakes' pathways enjoy the classic music that is piped in, but that is at a very low sound level that allows it to be pleasant background music. Cypress gives no indication (at least that I have access to) of what kind of music they plan to play, at what volume, and during what hours, which concerns me greatly. Should the City Council decide to allow amplification, I strongly recommend that it be with conditions regulating the level of sound, the hours allowed and the type of music. Wendy Amundson 7310 York Ave So, #106, Edina, MN 952 - 635 -4613 llacWe Hoo enakker From: Per Christensson <sharpened @mac.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 3:46 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010.0005 Feedback Edina Planning Dept, I understand the concerns with Cypress Equities' requested amendment, but I think a bowling alley / casual event venue would be perfect for the vacant location next to The Container Store. This area currently does not have any good late -night entertainment places, and the lot across Centennial Lakes would be a great place to have one. I hope we can come to some agreement that allows Pinstripes or a similar company to move into the venue without causing too much late night noise. Thanks, Per Christensson sbarpenednmac -com Jackie Hoogenakker From: Peggy Moineau <peggyjmae @yahoo.com> Seat: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:41 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file: 2010.0005 To Whom it Concerns: My husband and I live in the Centennial Lakes area and received notification about Cypress Equities' request to eliminate 415 "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution N. 2007.63. We would like to request that you leave the statute in place. We have lived where amplification is aliwxed and have found it to be very intrusive for the residents in the area. Regards, Philippe and Peggy Moineau Jackie Hoogenalkker - Prow: Michael Waring <m.g.waring @gmail.com> Seat: Saturday, June 19, 2010 7:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Public Hearing Notice - Case File: 2010.000S To whom it may concern: As one who has requested the late night and early morning intervention of the Edina Police Department a number of times to address trucks idling overnight, machine cleaning of the Target parking lot, and loud car stereos behind the Fedex/Kinko store among other noise complaints, I first ask the rhetorical question: why does an outdoor restaurant need amplification? There is no need to answer my question, but I can state that I am opposed to the elimination of item #15 from the project description. Michael Waring 7220 York Ave So 4417 Edina 956- 952 -0220 i Jackie H000enakker From: GARY PHILLIPS <garyphil1ips2 @msn.com> Sect: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: gp 6 -19 to: city of edina planning department from: g phillips 7350 york avenue south edina mn 55435 thank you for telling me of public hearing re request of cypress equities to eliminate #15 of resolution no 2007 -63. with cypress equities on the property at 7311 france, the damage is already done, nevertheless i request that you eschew approval of all unrelenting requests by cypress equities to change terms it agreed to earlier, it is my hope that cypress equities will leave your area. i Jackie Hoocoenakker From: Marlowe Iverson <ivy @mainsol.net> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:13 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Lot 1, Block 1 Edina Development Addition Gentlemen, My wife and I live at 7220 York Ave. S. #404, Edina 55435. We want no amplification for the subject restaurant. Marlowe Iverson El D El LA �0 G. L - - - -------------------- C. RAE INTERIORS, LTD.: A- Ir•, I.. .. _ .. .. _ .. _ - -.. i • —_ °' ��_.. .� .fie+..+ tw • -..,r- r "..� -F: '.. .' / C. I#AE INTERIORS. LTD. 4- � p JacWe Heogenakker From: Jennifer Bennerotte Seat: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:19 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor FYI Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 ibennerotte(a)ci.edina.mn.us From: Arnold Bigbee [mailto :arniebl @me.com] Sens: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4 :05 PM Too Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Fwd: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes - please forward to Mayor Jennifer, as promised. Arnie Begin forwarded message: From: Arnold Bigbee <arnieb1 ame.com> Date: June 9, 2010 11:12:01 AM CDT Too Hovel Susan <showl2ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: summary note from Arnie's visit to Pinstripes o please forward to Mayor Susan, please forward this note to the Mayor. Thank you. Jim, my wife and I visited the Pinstripes location in a suburban development on Higgins Rd. in South Barrington. The food and service were excellent. We dined outside and I noticed that the sound system had speakers attached to each large umbrella over the outdoor tables. We had no sound interference with our meal conversation. The bocce ball outdoor courts (about 30 feet from us) were being used but we noticed no noise from those courts. The bowling alleys were separated from the restaurant by a 10 - 12 foot wide opening that was able to be closed off w /sliding doors. There were many families in the facility eating and playing. The decor is "upscale" with lots of art on the walls and tile and hardwood flooring. There were many small dining areas, each w/8 -15 tables. There were also 4 -6 smaller rooms for groups of up to 15 for birthday parties and other gatherings. The ballroom seating up to 300 was on the second floor. We saw one fire pit which was not active during our visit. The facility did not have a "sports bar" feel or sound nor did we see the clientele one would expect to see at a sports bar (i.e., groups of people cheering while watching sports contests on large screen tv's). We were favorably impressed with the operation as a family food and fan destination. I also need to share that, although Pinstripes offered to compliment our meals, I declined that offer and paid for our meals. My wife and I believe that Pinstripes would be a good neighbor in Centennial Lakes.if.other neighborhood concerns can be addressed. I have sent a few photographs to you via Susan and will leave menus and other material from Pinstripes at your office on Wed afternoon. Please call me if you have any questions I can answer. Jackie Hoosenakkeir From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:18 PM To: Brian Smith; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area FYI Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 -833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 ibennerottelcDci.edina.mn . us _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ From: Arnold Bigbee [mailto:arniebl @me,com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:05 PM Toe Jennifer Bennerotte Subject. Fwd: photo.showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area Begin forwarded message: From: Arnold Bigbee <arniebl (a)- me.com> Date: June 9, 2010 10:46:37 AM CDT To: Howl Susan <showl(-ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: photo showing sliding doors dividing bowling area from dining area Begin forwarded message: From: arniebl <arnieb1 Cc- me.com> Date: June 8, 2010 2:22:24 PM CDT To: Bigbee Arnold <arnieb1 _me.com >v Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone Jackie H®®gienakker From: Thomas Beckley <thomas.beckley @gmail.com> Sent; Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:16 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities hearing June 30 I reside at 7220 York #211 I am strongly against any outdoor music or amplifiers at 7311 France. The location is almost line of sight from my condo& the noise will deminish the neighborhood. There are many home owner residences very close to this location. We want to leave our windows open at night. Thank you, Tom Beckley thomas.beckleya.grmail _ com 952 -841 -0869 Home 612 - 910 -2419 Cell IL Jackie Hoogenakker From: J C MENTH <jbrooney @q.com> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 7:33 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: loud music My condo is at 7220 York Ave.So. in Edina. We are very close to 7311 France So. I am against any amendment to (2007 -63) article #15. I enjoy the quiet music from the speakers along the walkway at Cenntenial Lakes. I do NOT want any loud music in the area esp. at night. Thank you. 3enine Menth Ma R El (�0AM Brad:ley J. Winter - 8110 Coventry Place Edina, 11/ N. 55435 - . -� •.: 111 r 1: �i Th.,— e' 17 S® ® L1/ T° I_S EAUR AN T r r ASSESS M" E N T r n 4 EXCERPTS FROM THE STUDY The sound level assessment was performed with - respect -to the State of Minnesota nighttime noise standards and measured existing ambient sound levels. The objective of the sound level assessment was to establish the existing ambient sound level at the Coventry Townhomes, to demonstrate compliance with Minnesota noise standards as it relates to noise emanating from the restaurant, and to ensure minimal impact on the existing ambient sound level environment at the residential area. Existing ambient sound level measurements were carried out on Saturday, May 15th, 2010, between the hours of 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. These conditions were selected to represent a typical Summer evening when the Pinstripes Restaurant deck and patio would be in operation. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS The sound level assessment was performed with -respect-to the State of Minnesota nighttime noise standards and measured existing ambient sound levels. "It should be noted that, while these are receiving land use and not source standards, they have been interpreted by the state as applying to sources that impact the receiving land use. Thus, they do not include ambient levels not associated with the source in question. " So, what does this mean? — It means that only the generated (or amplified) nois es i accounted for when considering noise levels at a distance and not the addition of the existing ambient sound levels. That said — if you were to add the existing ambient noise levels to the noise level produced by the restaurant/bar patrons and the outdoor amplified music the decibel levels would be higher than what is stated in the study. B how much? That g Y Y assessment is missing from the provided analysis. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) The objective of the sound level assessment was to establish the existing ambient sound level at the Coventry Townhomes, to demonstrate compliance with Minnesota noise standards as it relates to noise emanating from the restaurant, and to ensure minimal impact on the existing ambient sound level environment at the residential area. A single sinusoidal, swept frequency point source was used to represent sound level projections of voice and music from the deck and patio. This single, swept frequency component does not represent the various harmonics (or frequency components) that are inherent to a persons voice, crowd noise, or music. The swept sine wave, at any point in time, represents only a singular portion of the spectrum covered by the human voice, crowd noise, or music; therefore, is not an accurate representation of the noise that will be emanating from the restaurant. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) So, which of the following waveforms best illustrates the noise emanating from the restaurant/bar ?' .A question to pose to the :reader — Do the Minnesota Vikings use a single sinusoidal, swept frequency point source to emulate crowd noise when they are practicing for a big game? think not! They use the sound's of the stadium, as recorded from earlier encounters, to emulate the conditions of the game. This is the same approach that the sound level assessment should have taken. A real -world accounting of the noise sources, whether it be voice and /or music. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) A sing le sinusoidal,. swept frequency point source was used .to 'represent sound level projections of voice: -and music from the 'deck and patio. This is a flawed assessment. I count a total of seven (7) :exterior speaker sources. This means that there are seven (7) 'sources of, in phase, noise emanating from the exterior of the 'building. This does not include the addition of existing ambient 'noise, crowd noise emanating from the balcony, or noise generated from within the restaurant/bar. In phase noise and the principal of constructive and destructive-.. interference are illustrated on the next slides. R AN L�(S'0 OF TH.E STUDY E_XC RPTS_(CONTI.NUED) "I Destructive intelrfe'rence is deposed in9eictre below a estructilVe i'nterfe:rence; .o r, subtractive properti,es of sourid iwaves, s;hoaws -that' the :amplit de: of two out;:of phase waves r e .. y ..:• sbtract to form a:resItingw�ave of`zero arnpl,!tude, Therefore, ono ia:u d•a bi�e' s:o un�d: l eve Combined wave Will wave wave h jTwo waves 180' oul i of -Phase ji r s 1 ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) Since the seven (7) speaker sources are playing the same music, most of the frequency components will be additive. As mentioned previously, this does not include the in phase harmonics (or frequency components) of the existing ambient noise, crowd noise, or any other sounds emanating from within the restaurant/bar. The provided sound level assessment for the Pinstripes Restaurant falls short in that it does not accurately represent the noise sources (and associated sound levels) emanating from the interior and exterior of the building. The reason — It does not accurately account for all noise sources and the real - world noise being generated from those sources. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) Existing ambient sound level measurements were carried out on Saturday, May 15th, 2010, between the hours of 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. These conditions were selected to represent a typical Summer evening when the Pinstripes Restaurant deck and patio would be in operation. Since the Pinstripes restaurant/bar is planned to be open throughout the entire year, this small sampling of ambient noise levels is inadequate. A true sampling of ambient noise levels would be taken during Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter. In addition, this sampling does not address the presence of patrons on the patio or deck, in the Winter months, while enjoying the proposed outdoor, wood burning fireplaces. The above statements transition to discussions on weather conditions, moisture in the air, the reflective nature of water /ice with - respect -to sound, and a whole host of other issues that were not addressed in the provided Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. THE FOND AS A REFLECTOR OF SOUND Sound reflects from water (or ice) due to the fact that water (or ice) is denser than air. The principle of refraction is a bit more complicated than that, but the essence of the argument is still sound. No pun intended. The simulation in the figure below shows the effect of sound waves being (totally) refracted from the surface of the water. The complete refraction is due to the angle of incidence of the sound with - reference --to the surface of the water. n2hil= D.22 slower 1 faster THE POND AS A REFLECTOR OF SOUND (CONTINUED) The point to be made by the previous slide, and its associated figure, is that sound is reflected from the waters (or ice) surface. There is no significant damping effect (suppression, attenuation) or reduction in the sound level as it hits the waters surface; therefore, the sound continues to propagate (or travel) down range — meaning to the other side of the pond and the Centennial Lakes Park residential area. The question is raised — Why was this phenomena (standard Physics) not included in the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment? THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE INVERSION ON SOUND WAVES The picture.below, and the text which follows on the next slide, defines the effects of sound waves traveling in the presence of a temperature inversion. Please pay special attention to' the text highlighted in vad on the next slide. m THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE INVERSION ON SOUND WAVES (CONTINUED)_____ A temperature inversion is when the temperature is coolest- ,right next to the ground and warmer as you increase in height above the ground. Since the temperature increases with height, the speed of sound also increases with height., This means that for a sound wave traveling close to the ground, the part of the wave closest to the ground is traveling the slowest, ,,and the part of the wave farthest above the ground is traveling the fastest. As a result, the wave changes direction and bends downwards. Temperature inversions most often happen at night after the sun goes down when the ground (or water din a lake) cools off quickly, while the air above the ground remains warm. This downward refraction of sound is why you can hear the conversations of campers across the lake. THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE INVERSION ON SOUND WAVES (CONTINUED): _ _ . - -- T.he discussion and analysis related to the effects of temperature inversion is not discussed in the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. Rhis is yet another illustration as to the lack of completeness of this sound study. OTHER QUESTIONS /CONCERNS Is there going to be a police presence at the Centennial Lakes Park after closing? This is a concern because of the issues already documented at the park after hours — noise, vandalism-, loitering,, and the like. Since the park closes at'midnight, why would Pinstripes be allowed to be open beyond the park closing time? If outdoor amplified music were to be allowed at the Pinstripes Restaurant, would that set a precedence for other restaurants (or establishments) such as, Chuck E Cheese's to petition for outside amplified music? Would this not upset the aesthetic nature of the park? OTHER QUESTIONS /CONCERNS (CONTINUED)._ The last paragraph on page one states that "n.o simulated signals were generated from the triangular part of ,the upper deck.„ So, this means that no simulated or real -world noise assessment was performed with- regards -to an open deck, with :a, proposed fireplace, that people will obviously sit around, drink, talk, and smoke during the Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter months. This is another part of the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment that is missing. OTHER QUESTIONS/CONCERNS_ (CONTINUED) ® The statement made in the last sentence on page six, paragraph one :states the following — "The conditions were selected to represent a typical Summer evening when the . Pinstripes deck and patio would be in operation. " The comment made in paragraph two, sentence two, on page one clearly states that the Pinstripes establishment will operate year !round. So; the question arises — Why not evaluate real -world sound levels ;from the open deck, containing a proposed fireplace? I assume the intent is to allow patrons to warm themselves, drink, talk, yell, and . smoke during the Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter months? Is it not? I believe this use -case would be a valid assessment criteria for this study. Why was this not included in the study? OTHER QUESTIONS /CONCERNS (CONTINUED) - The last paragraph on page six states the following — "Statistical distributions of sound level at Site 2 are shown on Figure 4.2. Traffic noise, especially at 5 pm on a weekday, is considerably higher than during other periods." On the same page in the first paragraph, second sentence, it states the following "These readings were taken on Saturday afternoon and evening, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. " So, which is it? During the weekday at 5:00 pm, or on Saturday, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10 :00 and 11:OOpm? The inconsistent nature of the statements made in the study bring into question the thoroughness with which the study was carried out. CONCLUSIONS There are many reasons,. as stated in the above. slides, why the ,completeness of'this sound study be called into question. A few of the issues are reiterated below. A lack of accounting for all of the known sources of noise, whether it be the human voice, crowd. , noise, or music. ® A sinusoidal swept sine -wave does not represent a true accounting of the various harmonics associated with the human voice, crowd noise, music, or ambient sound levels. The additive nature, due to constructive interference, is not considered when evaluating the total noise levels from all noise sources. CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) - There was no accounting of deck noise during the Spring, Summer, t=all, and Winter months. Patrons will be utilizing the proposed outdoor fireplaces and fire pits year round. So, why not include this in your study? No accounting of the weather conditions on the travel of sound waves across the Centennial Lakes Park ponds. This is a real concern whether the pond is used for water activities in the warm weather months, or the pond is used for ice skating during the Winter months. SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION I believe I have presented, in the above slides, enough evidence to call into question the completeness of the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. It is my recommendation that the City of Edina and its Planning Commission reject the request of Pinstripes Restaurant (its representatives and investors) to lift the restriction on the ban of outdoor amplified music. In addition, I am against allowing outdoor fireplaces and fire pits on the property. This is due to both the lack of disclosure provided in the original elevations and the fact that a true assessment of the noise sources during the Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter were not considered as part of the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. SUMMARY &RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED) To clarify myself —1 am not against utilizing the property; however, am against any establishment that does not maintain the tranquility and aesthetics of the Centennial Lakes Park and its Residential Community. The Centennial Lakes Park is an oasis in the City of Minneapolis. Every resource in the City of Edina, its residents, its Planning Commission, and its City Counsel must be utilized in order to maintain that environment for all to enjoy. s >. 4, 'r 10Ci9 CDcjio1hy Mae Combs 72220 Yui k Ave #1322 Edilna MN 55435 Public Hearing Notice EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7,00 PM Location: City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 60t" Street CASE FILE: 2090.0005 TO: Property Owners within 1000 -Feet APPLICANT- Cypress Equities PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7391 France Avenue South, Edina, MN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, South Edina Development Addition REQUEST: Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment To Master Plan and Final Development Plan Cypress Equities ". PROPJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting that the City of Edina eliminate #15. "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No. 2007.63. HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and or 2. Fax your views to the attention of the Planning Dept. @ 9521826 -0389 3. E. -mail your views to jhoogenakker @ci.edina.rnn.us 4. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0369 DATE OF NOTICE:, June 18, 2010 %l Jackie Hoegenakker From: Larry Kohout <larrykohout @comcast.net> Sera: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:37 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: re: Public Hearing Notice To Whom It May Concern. You have asked (or feedback on the request to amend resolution no. 2007 -63. While, technically any music that isn't live and unamplified would, by definition, have amplification, I suppor( the spirit ol'the resolution. 1 ant opposed to allowing, any restaurant or other business (and for that mater private citizens) to create a noise so as to infringe on the space of a neighbor. Please do not make changes to any resolution we may have in place disallowing the spread of noise pollution in our city. Thank you. Larry and Cathy Kohout 7220 York Ave. So. #520 Edina. MN 55435 Tel. 952.838.9714 Cel. 612.581.1585 Peace, Larry "People in wheelchairs place the greatest demands on accessibility... But when a building meets the wheelchair user's standards, everyone benefits."— lann Hartman Jackie Fioo}gereakker From: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 8:14 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Lynette - Please distribute my comments to the following leaders: Anol-her for tomorrow night..,. Freer: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 2:11 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague Cc: Susan Howl; 'rknutson @ck- law.com'; Arlene Forrest; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter; Julie Risser; Karwehn Kata; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy N. Scherer; Steve Brown Subject, F1N: Lynette - Please distribute my comments to the following leaders: Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Gordon Hughes, Roger Knutson, Cary Teague and the Planning Commission members. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionisl 552 -927 -886'1 www.cityofedina.com From: kerrykisling @aol.com [mailto:kerry]clsling @aol,com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 1 :32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Lynette - Please distribute my comments to the following leaders: Gordon Huges, City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Cary Teague, City Planner Roger Knutson, City Attorney Michael Fischer, Chairman Planning Commission Stephen Brown, Planning Commission Jeff Carpenter, Planning Commission Arlene Forset, Planning Commission Floyd Grabiel, Planning Commission Julie Risser, Planning Commission Nancy Scherer, Planning Commission Michael Schroeder, Planning Commission Kevin Staunton, Planning Commission 28 2.43} � '0 r-! ti Re: June 30 Public Hearing Request to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment to Master Plan Final Development Plan, Cypress Egulties" (Condition # 15) Pinstripes Restaurant As a resident of Edina and Coventry Town homes, I respectfully request that the City Leaders of Edina approve the elimination of Condition #15. E am also in favor of an outdoor fireplace - with the Fire Chiefs blessing. I have met with the owner /manager of Pinstripes and believe that every measure will be taken to operate a successful business as well as be a respectful neighbor. I trust the City Leaders will agree that amplified music on an exterior patio is a lovely addition and adds to the overall dining experience. I am confident that Pinstripes' management would no sooner "amplify" their exterior music in excess, thereby creating an uncomfortable dining experience - let alone disturb residents located quite a distance from the diners. Sincerely, Kerry Kisling 410 Coventry Lane Edina, MN 55435 952 -426 -0527 Jackie Ho€rgenakker __ Frorn: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 8:13 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: letter to be read at Wed.'s Planning Commission meeting Please print this letter and mike copies to hand out to tl-ie.plar1ning Commission on Wednesday. Thanlcsi From: Mike Fischer [ mailto : Mike. Fischer @lhbcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:38 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: F1N: letter to be read at Wed.'s Planning Commission meeting Cary, Please make sure the planning commissioners get this letter. Thanks IViike From: Gordon Hughes [mailto :GHughes @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 3:24 PM To: Mike Fischer Subject: FW: letter to be read at Wed.'s Planning Commission meeting From: Housh, Scot [mailto:scot,housh@willis.corn] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 3:22 PM To: Gordon Hughes Cc: inellum.julie @gmail.com Subject: letter to be read at Wed.'s Planning Commission meeting Gordon - I think this is the letter she would like read at the planning commission. Please disreagard my previous e-mail on the topic. Please forward to Mike Fischer. Thanks, Scot floush President and CFO Willis of Minnesola, Inc. 1600 Utica Avenue So, Suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55116 Q' 763- 302 -7174 6S: 763 - 302 -7500 srq_t,hfw. }lt i frc.c , r ;• r, From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailLo:mellum.julie @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:32 AM To: Housh, Scot Subject: letter to be read at'Wed.'s Planning Commission meeLing Scot, Thank you for talking with me about Pinstripes' wood burning fireplace request —and bur shared concerns about obesity! I appreciate your willingness to pass on this letter to Michael Fisher to be read at the Planning Commission meeting this Wednesday night. Many thanks, Julie To the Edina Planning Commission: Attention: Michael Fisher Parks and public spaces are designed for the use and enjoyment of all citizens -- a place of tranquility and repose - -a place for kids to play where the air is clean and nature can be enjoyed. This is so important that the Americans with Disabilities Act guarantees people with disabilities like asthma "access" to city streets, parks and sidewalks. "Barriers" must be removed that prevent this use, In fact, a federal court required a town in Iowa to stop wood burning because it presented a barrier to a child with severe asthma, preventing her from using public spaces. Pinstripes' request to install a sound amplification system, along with wood burning fireplaces "for atmosphere," would in fact wreck and degrade the atmosphere. Who needs more noise? And who needs more wood smoke in our air? Especially when it is a major source of black carbon soot fine particles which Edina and all cities are struggling to reduce. Wood smoke is implicated in asthma attacks, heart attacks, premature death and even global warming. Edina is attempting to become "greener" in terms of ordinances and livability. I urge all City Council members to deny Pinstripes' requests for more sound and smoke, because there are alternatives. Gas fireplaces are light years cleaner. Children, with their smaller lung capacities, breathe in more pollution with every breath they take. The decisions we make today will affect our children and grandchildren for years to come. Edina doesn't need more recreational pollution. Julie Mellum Edina resident 5700 York Avenue S. Edina, MN 55410 Home phone: 952 - 303 -6218 Mel lum.iulie&- g mail, com For information pertaining to Willis' email confidentiality and monitoring policy, usage restrictions, or for specific company registration and regulatory status information; please visit lit( Ilis.comlcniail trailer.'isux We are now able to offer our clients an encrypted email capability for secure eomnumieation purposes. If you wish to take advantage of this service or learn more about it, please let me know or contact Vora• Client Advocate for full details. Jackie Hoogenakker _ -- — From: Richard Speers <rspeers @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:55 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010.0005-Cypress Equities Sir /Madam- Attached is an e-mail expressing my views on the Cypress Equities request re: Resolution 2007.63. To simplify, I restrictions placed on aniplification of music and other sound to protect the balance uses at this edge of Centennial Lake and the adjoining commercial properties. I suggest a limit of 65 dBa since that's what their own studies recommend and seems to be a reasonable compromise to allow this development proceed without much if any disturbance to adjacent residential neighbors. Thank you for your attention. Richard Speers retired Architect 703 Coventry Lane Edina -- - - - - -- Original Message -- - - - - -- Subject: attn. Mayor and City Council members Re: Pinstripes Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:54:32 -0500 From: Richard Speers <rspeers @comcast.net> <mailto:rspeers@comcast.net> To: edina mail @ci.edina.mn,us Mayor Hovland and Council Members- I am writing to follow up on the last Council meeting when I addressed the sound testing produced for the Pinstripes development at the north end of Centennial Lake.. I am not able to attend the next meeting but would like to make one or two points. First, I favor the Pinstripes proposal and the proposed chane for liquor sales at bowling establishments -with conditions. I believe it is appropriate to put conditions on Pinstripes because the building is part of a "commercial zone" that directly @butts a "recreational zone " - Centennial Park. These zones may not coincide with a zoning map, but nevertheless represent a seam where two uses - sometimes conflicting -meet each other. If Pinstripes were further away from this seam, I would not suggest conditions, but in this case I think it is appropriate to ask that sound be limited to the 65 Dba referred to in Pinstripes' own study. If you look at Pinstripes' website, you see the potential for live music which could possibly be louder than 65 Dba on certain occasions. So I'm suggesting that 65 be the limit for the spoken word, amplified music and live music when measured at the edge of the exterior balcony of the development. Thank you for your attention. Richard Speers 703 Coventry Lane r1iI� Jackie H000enalcker From: Juris- Wright Vicki <vjuris- wright@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:54 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010 -0005 My name is Vicki Wright and I live at 7220 York Avenue South #321. I am against allowing Cypress Equities making ari amendment to Resolution No 2007 763. NO AMPLIFICATION PLEASE! Sincerely, Vicki Wright l Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 4:03 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Letter for Planning Commission Public Hearing Today, July 28, 2010 Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: nsourova @aol.com [mailto:nsourova @ aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 4:00 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Letter for Planning Commission Public Hearing Today, July 28, 2010 July 28, 2010 Edina Planning Commission: Michael Fischer, Chairman Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Arlene Forrest Floyd Grabiel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer Michael Schroeder Kevin Staunton Re: Cypress Equities Requests to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 (June 5 2007) With respect to the "Restaurant Building" where Pinstripes Bowling/Bocce/Bistro is Planning to Open Their Business Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing this letter because I cannot attend a Public Hearing that you are holding today in respect to Cypress Equities request to add the following items to the proposed by them and Pinstripes business at the Building C, i.e.: 1. Sliding Glass Walls, and 2. A two -sided Wood Burning Fireplace. My husband and I live in Building 5 or Centennial Lakes Condominium. Our building and our unit are located very close the building C, where Cypress/Pinstripes are planning to build glass wall and wood fireplaces. 1. I do not have objections against addition of glass wall that, I assume is going to prevent amplified music and noise from outdoor seating to be heard in our condo units and in the Park. 2. Having wood - burning fireplaces outdoor of this establishment is unacceptable. My husband has heart problems (heart attack and stent). Also he is allergic. Wood smoke is a toxic hazard to human health in general and to my husband's health in particular. We have daily strong West winds, which will carry wood -smoke to our unit causing health problem and nuisance. FYI — there are a few more homeowners with health problems, who live in our building and whose health will be negatively affected by the fumes of wood - buming fireplaces. While nuisance situation is generally reparable by prohibiting the source of nuisance, the damage to the health of the people who are already suffering from medical problems, may not be reversible. Please do not allow the outside wood - burning fire places so closes to our residence Sincerely, Natasha Sourova 7400 Edinborough Way, Unit #5307 Edina, MN 55435 Tel: 612- 280 -2973 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Joan R <flutes01 @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 10:27 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: AMENDMENT MY VOTE IS NO FOR THE APPROVAL FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. LOT 1, BLOCK 1. JOAN ROHLF 7400 EDINBOROUGH WAY 45202 EDINA,MN 55435 E�E1v ,► Jackie Hoogenakker From: janicecatherwood @comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:44 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Pinstripes Regarding approval of an outdoor Wood burning fireplace, l believe the Centrum building on the lake has two Wood burning fireplaces and also one outside of building. Hopefully, Pinstripes request Will be granted. Looking forward to having Pinstripes in our community. Thank you, Janice Catherwood 203 Coventry Court Edina July 27, 2010 Edina Planning Commission: Michael Fischer, Chairman Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Arlene Forrest Floyd Grabiel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer Michael Schroeder Kevin Staunton Re: Cypress Equities Requests to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 (June 5, 20071 Final Development Plan with respect to Buildine C. the "Restaurant Buildine" Background Cypress Equities has made two requests to amend their June 5, 2007 Final Development Plan: 1) On June 11 they requested removal of the prohibition of Outdoor Amplification. On June 30 the PlanningCommission recommended allowing such Amplification as long as it does not exceed State noise standards and is not audible to residents on their property on the east side of Centennial Lakes. 2) On June 25 they submitted Revised Elevations adding - Sliding Glass Walls, and - A two sided Wood Burning Fireplace. On July 6 the City Council asked the Planning Commission to make a recommendation with respect to the June 25 request. Accordingly, on July 28 the Commission will hold a Public Hearing with respect to these additions. On August 2 the City Council will hold a Public Hearing to consider and act on the Planning Commission's recommendations with respect to the June 11 and June 25 requests. Our Position We have no objection to the addition of Sliding Glass Walls. Applicant committed to adding such Walls if the Council allowed outdoor amplified music. However; we strenuously object to the addition of the Wood Burning Fireplace: - Wood Smoke is a proven hazard to human health (see Dianne Plunkett Latham's June 1 l E -mail to the Planning Commission.) - Children, the elderly and those with asthma, allergies or heart disease are particularly vulnerable. One of the undersigned is such a person. - There is no functional requirement to provide heating or cooking capability. The prevailing westerly winds would spew forth daily doses of toxic fames over Park Users and nearby Residents. - While applicant may argue that Edina permits wood fires, such fires are generally limited to infrequent use in cold weather when neighbors are not outdoors. - Applicant has the benefit of property with no setback from Centennial Lakes Park. The City should not permit abuse of this privileged position by permitting a wood burning fireplace. A gas fireplace could provide the desired ambience without harming Park Users and nearby Residents. Sincerely, 800 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 952- 921 -0338 cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague, City Planner Roger Knutson, City Attorney Members of the City Council RECEIVED Jackie Hoogenakker From: seymourhandler @gmail.com Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities It is difficult for me to understand why the City Council cowtows to Cypress Equities in the latter's efforts to destroy Centennial Lakes Park for the sole purpose to profit the Texas business. You should tell them to get lost. Edina has far too much invested in this wonderful urban park to permit it to be defaced and damaged by anything Cypress proposes on the north end of the park. Not only will this park be damaged by Cypress, but also fine Coventry homes will be adversely affected by the created noise. By all means, do not permit sound amplification by the proposed restaurant /bowling alley. I do not know enough about the other changes to offer a opinion. The best thing you can do is to tell Cypress to go back to Texas. Seymour Handler 525 Coventry Lane Edina 55435 mg1� E 1 Mi visit Jackie Hoogenalcker From: prehkarnp @starpoint. net Seat: Wednesday, July 21, 207.0 5:05 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: file 07.0.005 My wife and I own property at 903 Coventry Place in Edina. We continue to oppose any amplification of sound for the proposed restaurant /bowling center. I have worked in Economic Development in another community for over 40 years and I am sensitive to requests like this one. I also know how the sound would affect the residents in our housing complex. There will be enough noise without efforts to make it louder. Please protect our homes and patio's from this pollution, Thank you. Paul & Marcia Rehkamp 903 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 1 ,,C,•1 �'ovicetty iuru IM cad.; T' c 1 l:Li. Cdr S `t ° i e.- 1 S .�2s1/' C 1_%F' tom✓:_ L( �s-� � S'�',,. a ` , 11 � Jackie Hoogenakicer Front: Robert H. Rohlf <bob@ roberthrolilf.com> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 10:33 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject:: Development Plan amendment Re: Pinstripe requests to 1) amend their- plan to include wood burning outdoor fireplace, and 2) eliminate Condition #15 to Development Plan and thus allow outdoor sound amplification. I strongly oppose allowance of an outdoor wood burning fireplace and the permission for outdoor sound amplification. 'These elements on the east or south area of the facility infringe on the residential /park areas that have been in place for two decades at Centennial Lakes. This would bring an entirely different atmosphere to this area and on not anticipated by home owners when pt►rchasing their home here. The probable noise and commotion related to anticipated outdoor activities by Pinstripe are in direct conflict with the area atmosphere. DO NOT approve these requested changes and thereby keep the Pinstripe Restaurant/Bowling /Bar noise INSIDE where it belongs. Robert H Rohlf 5202 7400 Edinborough Way Edina, MN 55435 Robert H. Rohlf Associates 612 -991 -8173 bob aC )roberthroltlf.com - Jackie H.aogenakker From: Joan R <flutes01 @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 10:27 PM To: Jackie Hoogernakker Subject: AMENDMENT MY VOTE IS NO FOR THE APPROVAL FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. LOT 1. BLOCK 1. JOAN ROIILF 7400 LDINBOROUGH WAY 45202 EDINA,MN 55435 0 i � n� Jackie Hoogertakker From: seymourhandIer @gmaiLcom Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker SUbject: Cypress Equities it is difficult for me to understand why the City Council cowtows to Cypress Equities in the latter's efforts to destroy Centennial Lakes Park for the sole purpose to profit the Texas business. You should tell them to get lost. Edina has far too much invested in this wonderful urban park to permit it to be defaced and damaged by anything Cypress proposes on the north end of the park. Not only will this park be damaged by Cypress, but also fine Coventry homes will be adversely affected by the created noise. By all means, do not permit sound amplification by the proposed restaurant /bowling alley. I do not know enough about the other changes to offer a opinion. The best thing you can do is to tell Cypress to go back to Texas, Seymour Handler 525 Coventry Lane Edina 55435 M ®R� 9 Jackie Hoogenakker From: D Tabert <ddtab7220 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:33 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Cypress Equities Proposed Project at Centennial Lakes - Please Say NO THANKS Mr /l As. Hoogenakker: We do not wish to seethe natural environment at Centennial Lakes Park, so carefully planned-and created, and enjoyed by so many, violated on the north side of the park by music or any noise coining from the proposed entertainment facility. Buster & Dave's was rejected as not suitable to the park. How is the proposed facility any different? We believe it is not, and is not suitable for this wonderful park area. Best regards, Deborah and David Tabert David and Deborah Tabert 7220 York Avenue South, No. 512 Edina, MN 55435 952/831 -1703 ddtab7220@comcast.net •�, 1!'L 0 OR - I �3 E Aa- CL6 L7 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Bob Sander <bobsander47 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 8:58 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: bolianjohii@aol.com Subject: June 30, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Please forward this ernall to the I'lannine Commissioners prior to their .tune 30, 2010 meetiniz. .tune 29, 2010 _ Edina Planning Commission: Michael Fischer, Chairman Arlene I-orrest Nancy Schcrer Stephen Brown Floyd Gabriel Michael Schroeder Jeff Carpenter .Julie Risser Kevin Staunton Re: Planned hearing on Jurle 30, 2010 for request to eliminate prohibitions oil amplification of music foi- outdoor restaurants First of all, xvc thank you for the opportunity to provide our input to the matter coming before you on Wednesday, June 30, 2010. We appreciate the Nvork that the Edina City C- ouncil and Planning Commission have done in general and specifically with respect to the mixed used development at Centennial Lakes. We are very proud to be part of the Centennial Lakes community and welcome Pinstripes to the Centennial Lakes neighborhood. However, as residents of Coventry facing the restaurant site, we have concerns about the reques+ for amplified music and the planned use of wood burning, Fireplaces. Conscquentiy, We request that the Planning Commission re'ect the application of Cypress Equities to eliminate the prohibition on the amplification of music on the property located at "7311 France Avenue South, Edina, MN. furthermore, we also encourage the Planning Commission to disaprove the proposed use of wood - burning fireplaces. We believe that there is a substantial likelihood that outdoor "amplified music" would be heard by residents of Coventry across the lake. We are particularly concerned that Pinstripes plans to play amplified music until 12:30 a.m, on the weekend. We often leave our windows open at night and are concerned that our sleep could be interrupted by late night amplified music. In addition, we believe that the Commission should take into consideration the potential envirolunental and health issues posed by wood burning fireplaces. We are concerned that the property values of the residences in Coventry could be adversely affected by both the amplified music and the smoke from the wood - burning fireplaces. We also are concerned that the amplified music and Fireplaces could change the character of the par], and reduce the pleasant experience of the Edina residents who use the park on a daily basis. including many of our friends and neighbors. "thank you very much for the opportunity to provide input on these issues which are very important to our neighborhood and to the many Edina residents who use this beautiful park. Sincerely, Bob and Patty Strickland 808 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 952 -920 -6727 Jackie Hoogenakker From; Dieringer, Stephen < StephenDieringer @edinarealry.com> Sent; Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: June 30th Meeting to Amend Resolution No. 2007.63 Mr. Jay Hoogenakker, I'm sending you this e-mail to let you know how I feel about the proposed elimination of a15. As a homeowner in the Coventry Townhomes (521 Coventry Dr.) I strongly oppose any attempt to allow outdoor restaurants the use of amplification. One of the reasons I purchased at Coventry was the peaceful, serene, and quiet setting that it provided. Allowing a restaurant or any business to amplify sound would ruin the tranquility that Centennial Lakes provides, Sincerely, Stephen L. Dieringer Steve Dieringer CRS, ABR, GRI Professional Real Estate Service Since 1977 Edina Realty, City Lakes Office 3270 West Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 66416 (612) 926 -7717 Office (612) 414 -2895 Mobile If you lcnow of someone wino would 6cnefit From my services, Please call me with their name and number and I will 6e Nappy to lhclp them. This message is a solicitation. If you prefer not to receive iuture messages Irom this sender, please reply to (his message and type - REMOVE' in the subject line. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Cathy ANDERSON <catliyla @q.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:12 PM To: Jackie I-loogenakker Subject: 6/30/10 meeting To: Edina City Planning Department From: Home owner on Centennial Lalkes I am against the proposed change to eliminate amplification for outdoor restaurants. I live across fron the Centrum and when there is an event the "thumping of music (not piped outdoors) destroys my sleep...'of course this is usually only 2 nights a week so it is tollerable ... I. can not imagine it nightly. This is a beautiful residential and park setting. We have paid good money to live here because of it. Others love the peace Inside the city and come to the park to "get away from noise" and spend family time. Please do not destroy it. Cathy Anderson 7500 Edinborough Way #3107 Albert). Schroeder, M.D. 7320 York Avenue South, H212 Cdina, ION 55435 -4461 June 29.120 10 City of Edina Plaluming Department 4801 West 50 "' Street Edina, Mid. 55424 Re: Cypress Equities: Request reference to Article 15. Centennial Lakes Community Park is an absolute jewel and I believe it is treasured by all who have shared its beauty and serene setting, a location so skillfully insulated from busy roadways and commercial activities surrounding it. How sad it would be to spoil this precious area of tranquility and pcnce by allowing any venue that might degrade it with commotion and noise. Sounds of nightly entertainment, if allowed, would surely reverberate and echo across those peaceful lakes and paths, spoiling a rare and treasured haven of quiet beauty, tucked away in this busy but charming area. Noise free places are rare to find in our urban environment. Please give every consideration to preserving the tranquility of Centennial Lakes Park. Th4nk you. Albert J. Schroeder, M.D. Resident of Edina. Miiulesota fR��,►68 �tg 0 \ w s June 27, 2010 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Sir or Madam: I wish to inform you that I DO NOT want the City of Edina to amend Resolution 42007 -63 "Approving Amendment to Master Plan and Final Development Plan Cypress Equities ". I DO NOT want the City of Edina to eliminate #15, "No amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No. 2007.63. As the owner of 909 Coventry Place in Edina, I feel loud music, etc. would be a detriment to the local neighborhood. Amplification would not enhance the Coventry Development nor the peaceful walking path around Centennial Lakes. This is a lovely neighborhood, one not to be destroyed by loudness. Please DO NOT vote in favor of amending Resolution No. 2007 -6311 Thank you kindly, Regards, Sandra Anderson ry��9 W1 N r, V r< co . 9lc,1- 1L�L�" Jackie Hoogenakker From: Robert H. Rohlf e bob@ roberthrohlf.corn > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:41 PIA To; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: request for elimination of restriction on outdooprd music amplification Importance: High We protest any attempt to allow outdoor music amplification on the shores/banks of Centennial takes. The eastern shores are residential and have been since the area was developed. It would be an affront to residents to allow a drastic change in the nature of the area by allowing outdoor music amplification on western shore activities so near residences and with no control over the volume, type of music or hours of such noise and intrusion. This is a quiet residential /park area and not a commercial street or amusement area, The area along France Avenue is the commercial area, not the shores of the northern Centennial lake. Robert & Joan Rohlf 7400 Edinborough Way Edina 55435 -------------------- -------------------- --------- rV Robert H. Rohlf Associates / 612 - 991 -8173 1 bob@roberthrohlf.com dti! � fit, ��lSl►l��� . a a QP i 6o/ ���r�� Xt ttrti`�±ti.•Y4 June 24, 2010 Edina Planningq Commission 4801 West 50 Street Edina, MN 55424 Case File: 2010.0005 - Pinstripes To Whom It May Concern My wife and I own a condo at Centennial Lakes Association. Our property is located very close to Building #7311 France Ave. Our balcony is facing Centennial Lakes Park and we can easily see the balcony of Building #7311. Cypress Equities — a developer from Taxes - is trying to lease this portion of Building #7311 to Pinstripes from Illinois. I respectfully ask the Planning Committee to deny Cyprus request to eliminate the provision "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No. 2007 -63. This provision was created as a protection for the homeowners of surrounding residential areas from possible noise created by future occupant(s) of #7311. With Pinstripes we have exactly the situation for which the provision was created, Below are some points, describing the situation with #7311: 1. Being located close to building #7311 we will hear their noise, especially after 10 PM, when the rnain activities in Centennial Lakes Park are calming down. These sounds are naturally amplified by the water of the Lakes. 2. Pinstripes would be open 7 days a week and its hours of operation are: Mon. -Thu. 11:30am -11pm, Fri. 11:30am - 12:30am; Sat. 10am- 12 :30am; Sun. 10am- 10prn, Centennial Lakes Park is open till midnight every night. Why extend Pinstripes hours till 12:30 AM? 3. Pinstripes website describes and advertises its business as a place with "Unique Bowling /Bocce /Bistro experience ". If Pinstripes moves into building #7311 we'll have the situation of their patrons coming for bowling and bocce - ball with the excitement, which accompanies these games, combined with drinking intoxicating liquors the patrons will definitely create noise and disturbance for owners of the residential surrounding property. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW PINSTRIPES TO USE AMPLIFYING EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. Please do not remove "No- Amolifvina" provision from Resolution No. 2007 -63 resolution, which protects home- owners' piece and health. Respectfully submitted, Daniel Wise 7400 Edinborough Way, #5307 Edina, MN 55435 Tel: 952 - 832 -0696 Jackie Hoogenakker Front: NSourova @aol.corn Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 9:40 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Public Hearing: Pinstripes /Cypress Request to Permit Outdoor Amplification Attachments: Letter to Planning CommissionNS.doc Ldina Planniu Commission 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Case File: 2010.0005 To W110111 It May Concern My husband and 1 own a condo at Centennial Lakes Village Dome Association. O(u- property is located very close lu 7311 France Ave. Our xvindows and balcony are facing Centennial Lakes are in close proximity to the balcony of Building 1,7311. Cypress Fgttiiies - a developer fi-ont Taxes - is trying to lease this portion of Building 8731 1 to Pinstripes — bowling company with bistro sct -Vice fi-ont Illinois. They are asking City of Edina to alter Resolution No. 2007 -63 and to allow load - speakers on the balcony outside #731 1. I respectfully ask the Planting Contntittee to (lent/ Cyprus's request to eliminate the provision "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants') from Resolution No. 2007 -G3. This provision was created as a protection for the homeowners of sun-ounding residential areas from possible noise created by future occut}anl(sl of #731 I. With Pinstripes we have exac!�Llee situation for which the provision was created. There are some details, describing the situation with #7311: I . Being located so close to building B7311 we will hear a lot of sounds, especially alter 10 PM, when the utain activities in Centennial Lakes Park are calming down. These sounds are naturally anplif led by the water of the Lakes. 2, Pinstripes is planning to be open 7 days a week and its hours of operation are: Mon -Thu l 1:30ant -i 1 pill; Fri i 1:30am - 12:30ant; Sat l0anr12:30am; Sun 10am -1 Opm, i.e, late closing hours. 3. There are speakers throughout Centennial Lakes Park, which play quiet serine music. Building #731 1 located on the North border of the Park — very close to the Park (practically in the Park). Noise front Pinstripes' outside activities including sounds of Pinstripe's outside loud- speakers (if allowed) will interfere with l'ark's ambience and likely ruin it, 4. Pinstripes website describes and advertises its business as a place with "Unique Botvling/l3occe /Bistro experience ". In order to accommodate Pinstripes's and Cyprus's request to grant Pinstripes Intoxicating Liquor License. Edina City Council is considering amending Ordinance No. '_010 -) 3 that currently prohibits issuing intoxicating liquor licenses to BovOing b►tsinesses. The Council already voted 4 to i in favor of the first reading of this Antendntent. If Pinstripes moves into building #733 1 1 we'll have the situation when this establishment will be open 7 days a week till late night. Pinstripes patrons, hot and excited fi•ont bowling and bocce - balling; and consuming intoxicatint; liquors will be letting off "steam" and will definitely create noise and disturbance for us, owners uI'surrounding property. Please, protect the ambience of the Park and our homes - do not .rllo.\v Pinstripes to use anwlifying equipment outside of the building. Also.pleasc restrict outdoor seating; after 10 PM- Sincerely, r , �" Natalia Solt (wa Jackie Hoogenakker From: jariicecatheim,00d @comcast.net Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakl:er Subject: June 30th planning commission meeting Resolution No. 2007 -63 Per recent memo regarding above meeting, I support approval of the elimination of Resolution fro. 2007- 63,.and am in -favor of outdoor fireplace -.- - - - - - - Thank you very much. Janice Catherwood 203 Coventry Court Edina Tel: 952 - 893 -0221 OWN 1fI;7N�:�►��IJ :TUN- 28- 2t�1f� 1��: y7 Fh0!'i:CAP1PEELL C 952€31:S-257 TO: 9528260-329 F'.2�2 d� btA. - q5 Illy ' e put- jt,,a�� 1� L' Jackie Hoogenakker From: Ann or Bob Lindsey <ablindseyl @msn.com> Seat: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:50 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Request by Cypress Equities to allow outdoor amplication We received a letter dated June 18, 2010 regarding a request by Cypress Equities to the City of Edina to eliminate rule H15 - "No amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants." We are proponents of Pinstripes occupying the space at the north end of Centennial Lakes Park as we believe it will be a good draw - a worthy destination to attract patrons. We do live in the Centennial Lakes Condos and use the park frequently. We do not however believe music piped outdoors would be beneficial for the park. We believe the City should not amend the rule regarding outdoor amplification for the following reasons: 1. The park has quiet classical music playing already 2. One of the many features of the park is its atmosphere of serene tranquility which we believe would be disrupted with outdoor amplification of music, which would likely not be quiet music. 3. Sound carries a further distance over water so the likelihood of sound carrying across the lake to the town homes on the north end and beyond is high. 4. Music playing would likely increase the speaking level of patrons sitting outside as they would have to talk over the volume of the music. We would urge the Council to vote no to the request. Thank you for notifying property owners and giving us the opportunity to voice our opinion. Sincerely, Ann and Bob Lindsey .tune_ 24. 2010 Edina Planning Commission 4901 West 50 "' Street Edina, MN 55424 Case File: 2010.0005 To Whom It May Concern My husband and I own a condo at Centennial Lakes Village Home Association. Our property is located very close to 7311 France Ave, Our windows and balcony are facing Centennial Lakes are in close proximity to the balcony of Building #7311. Cypress Equities — a developer from 'Taxes - is trying to lease this portion of Building #7311 to Pinstripes — bowling company with bistro service from Illinois. They are asking City of Edina to alter Resolution No. 2007 -63 and to allow loud- speakers on the balcony outside 4731 I. I respectfully ask the Planning Committee to deny Cyprus's request to eliminate the provision `No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No. 2007 -63. This provision was created as a protection for the homeowners of surrounding residential areas from possible noise created by fi►ture occu an slpf X17311. With Pinstripes we have exactly the situation for which the Drovision was created. There are some details, describing the situation with #7311: i . Being located so close to building #7311 we will hear a lot of sounds, especially after 10 PM, when the main activities in Centennial Lakes Park are calming down. These sounds are naturally amplified by the water of the Lakes. 2. Pinstripes is planning to be open 7 days a week and its hours of operation are: Mon -Thu 11:30arn -1 I pm; Fri 11:30am - 12:30am; Sat IOam- I2:30am; Sun l Oam -1 Opm, i.e. late closing hours. 3. There are speakers throughout Centennial Lakes Park, which play quiet serine music. Building 97311 located on the North border of the Park — very close to the Park (practically in the Park). Noise from Pinstripes' outside activities including sounds of Pinstripe's outside loud- speakers (if allowed) will interfere with Park's ambience and likely ruin it. 4. Pinstripes website describes and advertises its business as a place with "Unique Bowli:ng/Bocce/Bistro experience ". In order to accommodate Pinstripes's and Cyprus's request to grant Pinstripes Intoxicating Liquor License, Edina City Council is considering amending Ordinance No. 2010 -13 that currently prohibits issuing intoxicating .liquor licenses to Bowling businesses. The Council already voted 4 to i in favor of the first reading of this Amendment. If Pinstripes moves into building 47311 we'll have the situation when this establishment will be open 7 days a week till late night. Pinstripes patrons, hot and excited from bowling and bocce- balling; and consuming intoxicating liquors will be letting off "steam" and will definitely create noise and disturbance for us, owners of surrounding property. Please protect the ambience of (lie Park and our homes - do not allow Pinstripes to use use ampliiying equipment outside of the building Also please restrict outdoor seating after 10 PM. Sincerely, i Natalia Sourova 7400 Edinborough Way, 45307 Edina, MN 55435 Tel: 952 -532 -0696 June 24, 2010 Edina Planning Commission 4801 West 50 ' Street Edina, MN 55424 Case File: 2010.0005 - Pinstripes To Whom It May Concern My wife and I own a condo at Centennial Lakes Association. Our property is located very close to Building #7311 France Ave. Our balcony is facing -Centennial Lakes Park and we can easily see the balcony of Building #7311. Cypress Equities — a developer from Taxes - is trying to lease this portion of Building #7311 to Pinstripes from Illinois. I respectfully ask the Planning Committee to deny Cyprus request to eliminate the provision "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No. 2007 -63. This provision was created as a protection for the homeowners of surrounding residential areas from possible noise created by future occupant(s) of #7311. With Pinstripes we have exactly the situation for which the provision was created. Below are some points, describing the situation with #7311: 1. Being located close to building #7311 we will hear their noise, especially after 10 PM, when the main activities in Centennial Lakes Park are calming down. These sounds are naturally amplified by the water of the Lakes. 2. Pinstripes would be open 7 days a week and its hours of operation are: Mon. -Thu. 11:30am -11pm, Fri. 11:30am - 12:30am; Sat. 10am- 12:30am; Sun. 10am -10pm. Centennial Lakes Park is open till midnight every night. Why extend Pinstripes hours till 12:30 AM? 3. Pinstripes website describes and advertises its business as a place with "Unique Bowling /Bocce/Bistro experience". If Pinstripes moves into building #7311 we'll have the situation of their patrons coming for bowling and bocce - ball with the excitement, which accompanies these games, combined with drinking intoxicating liquors the patrons will definitely create noise and disturbance for owners of the residential surrounding property. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW PINSTRIPES TO USE AMPLIFYING EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. Please do not remove "No-Amplifyir g' provision from Resolution No 2007 -63 resolution which protects home owners' niece and health. Respectfully submitted, Daniel Wise 7400 Edinborough Way, #5307 Edina, MN 55435 Tel: 952 - 832 -0696 Jackie Houenaicker From: Ellen Illg <EILLG @MARQUETTE.COM> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 9;49 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Bowling ally at Centennial Lakes RE: Cypress Equities - Amend article #15 ........ "NO AMPLIFICATION FOR OUTDOOR RESTAURANTS" I Thank you for your help! I live at the Village Homes of Centennial Lakes and would like our community to stay first class!, &fAW ..it Afg Jackie Hoogenakker e From: seymourhandler@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 1;10 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Resolution No. 2007.63 This request is a continuation of Cypress Equities' attempts to destroy the environment of Edina's wonderful Centennial Lakes Park purely for commercial purposes. If they want to open an outdoors restaurant, I have no objection. However, a restaurant could be operated without noise amplification, the presence of which would only disturb the neighbors and adversely affect the Park ambiance. Please deny the Cypress request. Patricia Handler 525 Coventry Lane r °� ��\ A r �C�lRP�7iZ.n�x'� yeas Fq, C Dorothy Mae Gomhs 7220 York Ave T 322 Edina MN 55435 CASE FILE: 2010.0005 Public Dearing Notice EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:00 PM Location: City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Stl•eet TO: Property Owners within 1000 -Feet APPLICANT: Cypress Equities PROPERTY ADDRESS: 731 *1 France Avenue South, Edina, MN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, South Edina Development Addition REQUEST: Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment To Master Plan and Final Development Plan Cypress Equities PROPJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting that the City of Edina eliminate #15. "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No. 2007.63. HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and or 2. Fax your views to the attention of the Planning Dept. @ 9521826 -0389 3. E -mail your views to jhoogenakker @ei.edina.mn.us 4. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4601 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0369 DATE; OF NOTICE: June 18, 2010 NK, XI/ p��U C7) -je .tune 27. 2010 Edina Planning Commission: Michael Fischer. Chairman Stephen Brown Jeff Carpenter Arlene Forrest Floyd Grabiel Julie Risser Nancy Scherer- Michael Schroeder Kevin Staunton cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague, City Planner Roger Knutson, City Attorney Re: June 30 Public Hearing, Renuest to Amend Resolution No. 2007 -63 "Approving Amendment to Master Plan and Final Development Plan, Cypress ErIttities" On .tune 23 1 respectfully requested that the planning Commission reject Applie;till's request to eliminate Condition if I5. "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaur'ants" for' a number of reasons, one or which w'as: "2) Applicant's Jane I I request is incomplete. Revised elevations reflecting contemplated building changes not included with June I I request." On June 25 the City Planning Manager provided the undersigned wvith the required revised elevations, dated .tune 24. Included therein was a 2nd floor plan identifying the addition of a "DOUBLE SIDED FIREPLACE ". On .tune 22 my counselor advised me that an outdoor wood - burning fireplace for this site is prohibited by the City Zoning Section 850.03, subd.2 (Letter from Patrick B. Steinhoff enclosed.) Of personal concern is Applicant's previously stated plan For'`... the attractive smells of natural firewood (emphasis added) from its outdoor fireplace." (Kiric Williams May 31 letter to City Council.) I suffer from significantly diminished lung capacity and coronary heart disease. Wood smoke is a clearly identified hazard to human health (See Dianne Plunkett Latham's June I I letter to Planning Commissioners). I should not have to suffer the daily onslaught of'wood smoke from the prevailing westerly winds. Further, property values of all residences experiencing a steady diet of wood smoke would be adversely affected. For the above reasons, and those stated in rrr)� Jllne 2' letter, please reject Applicant's request fur outside sound amplification and for a \vood burning fireplace, Sincerel-V John E Bohan 800 Coventry Place Ldina, MN 55435 952 - 921-0338 cc: Patrick B. Steinhoff, Mackall.Crouse & Moore. PLC: 6,'2 8,2 0 10 6:1 I ANN Lam 0111res 1400 ATST Too. r 901 Mautluenc APCtnIC Minneapolis. NiN 551b2-2859 T4lep110:1c: (612) 305-1400 Facsimile: (.6 12) 305.1414 w%N w.mcnlliw.com Mr. John E. Bohan 800 Coventry Place Edina, Minnesota 55435 Miftm Jittic 22. 2) 0 10 Re: In rc Cypress Equities Final Development Plan Application Dear Mr. Bohan: t'au•irl: 13. SlciuhnA' Attorney at Late th12i 3U5 -1477 pbs ",i mcnrhna.t•urn 1� This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding; the Final Development Plan application by Cypress Equities to allow a "Pinstripes" restaurant at the flormer movie theater site on the north end of Centennial Lakes park. I understand that you are particularly concerned about the possibility of a wood burning fire on the patio of the proposed restaurant as well as the proposal to remove the prohibition on amplified noise that was imposed by the C'ily as a condition of approval of the current Final Development Plan in 2007. 1 \Fill briefly respond to each concern below. 1. THE POSSIBLE WOOD- BURNING FIRE ON THE; PATIO OF TILE PROPOSED RESTAURANT. A wood- burning fireplace or tire pit' feature does not appear to be included in (lie Final Development Plan application filed with the City by Cypress Equities. Accordingly, perhaps the developer has already abandoned the concept. To the extent you are concerned that the developer or proposed tenant may operate an outdoor wood- burning fire anyway notwithstanding its absence from the application, it is my opinion that it cannot do so unless the City Council takes some kind of action to affirmatively allow such a use at this site (either as an atnendinent to the Final Development Plan or possibly as an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance itself). There is nothing in the approved development plan for this site, or elsewhere in the City Zoning Ordinance as it relates to MDD -6 districts, that expressly allows the operation of an outdoor wood- burning fire feature of this type. The City Zoning Ordinance contains a provision that prohibits any use of land that is not expressly permitted by the Ordinance, reading in relevant part as follows: 1P understand that there has previously been a great deal of discussion regarding whether the proposed development will include a "fireplace" as opposed to a "fire pit." The lire feature pictured on the wcbsile for Pinstripes (wtvw.pinstr•ipes.com) certainly looks like a "fire pit." However, since there is no rendering of the proposed fireplace or fire pit in the final Development Plan application submitted by the developer, it is impossible to know whether file fire feature at the subject property would resemble the one depicted on the website. In any event, the distinction between a fireplace and fire pit is not relevant to whether an outdoor wood - burning firm is a perntitled use Wider the City Zoning Ordinance or the approved Development Plan for this site. This distinction is only relevant to the proposed development's compliance with the City's building and fire codes. which is not presently at issue. m Mr. John L. Bohan June 22. 2010 Page 2 Any use not specifically allowed by this Section ill a district as a principal, accessory or conditional usc, shall Ilot be allowed of permitted in that district by implication. interpretation or other construction of. or meaning given to, the wording ol•this Sectinrt.... _ . City Code § 8.50.03, subd. 2. As an outdoor wood - burning fire of this type is not expressly identified as a principal, accessory of conditional Ilse for MDD -6 parcels, it is prohibited by the City Zoning Ordinance For this site. Were an outdoor wood - burning fire at this site ever aculally proposed by the developer. I expect that the City Planning Commission and City Council would view it skeptically in light of the obvious public health risks created by so much woad -smoke generated in such a densely - populated area. This is especially true given that Planning. Commission and City Council could easily avoid these public health risks by requiring a gas - burning fireplace as a condition of Final Development Plan Approval in lieu Of a wood- burning fireplace. I understand that there would be little to no conllnunity Opposition to such a compromise. 11. Titff., . PROPOSAL To ELIMINATG'rim RF.STRIC1'ION ON AAIPLIFIED NOiSE. The developer also proposes that the City eliminate Condition 15 from Resolution No. 2007 -63, which prohibits "amplification" for restaurants at this site. I recall that Condition 15 was the result of a hard- fought compromise relating to the original Cypress Equities' proposal to develop the site, a compromise which was only possible after litigation in Hennepin County District Court. At the very least, the elimination of Condition 15 by the City would seem to be a violation of the spirit of this compromise. I note that the applicant has offered absolutely no justification for the elimination of this condition apart from the statement that "Pinstripes strongly desires to play amplified music on its outdoor- patios and balconies." The "desires" of an individual tenant (which has apparently already committed to a long -term lease) is not a sufficient basis alone for the City to make a zoning decision of? this type. As you know, a municipality like the City may not make a zoning decision that is "arbitrary and capricious." See e.g. Trisko 1,. City of iVaile Park, 556 N.W.2d 349, 3.52 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). it would therefore not be lawful fir the City to approve this application based on nothing more than the preference of the applicant and its tenant, especially in light of all of the public interest considerations that led to till adoption of Condition 15 in 2007. At the very least, were the City to approve the application to eliminate Condition 15, it would not be Lim-easonable for you to demand that City require the developer to follow through with all of its proposed noise mitigation I1leosures (i.e. the noise- abating g,luss walls.. etc.) and to impose standards that tite City can enforce if Pinstripes generates too n111CI1 11015e. 'The nl'hUlllle noise levels permitted by 1Iinn. R. 7030.0040; subp, 2 For residential activities (1 -;n - L10 > .5), measured from the edue of tile nearest residential parcel would seem to be a reasonable standard, N-1/ xAl a f x zc n J1IS1�, II(A.1;F ,, : i �' ,r tr �\ \. ".A �, t ;10, i MT -Aolin G. Bohan .iunc 22. '010 , Page 3 provided that the Cite commits to enforcing, it by revoking the Final Development flan approval if necLSSarv. Please call me at 612.30-5.1471 ifyou have any questions regarding the foregoing. Very truly yours, MACKALL, CROUNSE & MOORE, PLC Patrick. B. Steinhoff 1255441 I -VII S Jackie Hoogenakker From: barb aramorgan7220@comcast.net Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 5:06 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject-: Re: Deleting article 1.5 Dear Sir or Madam: I am sending this email to express my grave concern regarding the possibility of an outdoor restaurant. with amplification in Centennial Lake park.I recall about two years ago that a sports bar wanted to use the same space,but after a visit from the mayor to the bar in the suburbs here it was decided that a sports bar was not right for Edina. Now the Planning Commission wants to bring in a similar facility!! Please do not spoil the beauty of this lovely park area by introducing loud music and no doubt noisy customers. I think this facility would be a wonderful Community Centre for the city of Edina. I hope the Planning Commision will re consider this matter. Thanking you, Sincerely, Barbara A. Morgan �u Jackie Hoogenakker From: Liz Canis tecanis @yahoo.corn> Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 9:36 Alai To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2010.0005 - Cypress Properties Good morning - This is Elizabeth Canis and I reside at 515 Coventry Lane in Edina. I received the public hearing notice regarding the request from Cypress Properties to eliminate #15 "No Amplification is allowed for outdoor restaurants" from Resolution No 2007.63. As a local resident, I would prefer to maintain the rule and not allow amplification. Being so close and being a high utilizer of the park, I do believe that it would be disruptive to the local community to have amplification at this location. I unfortunately can not attend the hearing on the 30th, but appreciate if you could represent my viewpoint and preference to let the current rule stand. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elizabeth A Canis 515 Coventry Lane Edina, MN 55435 952 - 835 -5630 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jerry Wells <.ierry@wellstax.com> Sent, Friday, June 25, 2010 12:47 PIA To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file 2010.0005 Cypress Equities Attachments: Jerome (1. C.) Wells (Business Fax).vcf I thank-it would be great to have outside.Music I C. Wells I Prepared Bye Bradley J. Winter 810 Coventry Place Edina, MN. 55435 The Review PINSTRIPES'RESTAURANTSOUND.LEVEL ASSESSMENT Is '■ uw-- EXCERPTS FROM THE STUDY The sound level assessment was performed with - respect -to the State of Minnesota nighttime noise standards and measured existing ambient sound levels. The objective of the sound level assessment was to establish the existing ambient sound level at the Coventry Townhomes, to demonstrate compliance with Minnesota noise standards as it relates to noise emanating from the restaurant, and to ensure minimal impact on the existing ambient sound level environment at the residential area. Existing ambient sound level measurements were carried out on Saturday, May 15th, 2010, between the hours of 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. These conditions were selected to represent a typical Summer evening when the Pinstripes Restaurant deck and patio would be in operation. ANALYSIS of THE STUDY EXCERPTS The sound level assessment was performed with - respect -to the State of Minnesota nighttime noise standards and measured existing ambient sound levels. "It should be noted that, while these are receiving lanai use and not source standards, they have been interpreted by the state as applying to sources that impact the receiving land use. Thus; they do not include ambient levels not associated with the source in question. " So, what does this mean? — It means that only the generated (or amplified) noise is accounted for when considering noise levels at a distance and not the addition of the existing ambient sound levels. That said — if you were to add the existing ambient noise levels to the noise level produced by the fi t/b tr ns and the outdoor amplified music the decibel levels res aura" ar pa o would be higher than what is stated in the study. By how much? That assessment is missing from the provided analysis. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) The objective of the sound level assessment was to establish the existing ambient sound level at the Coventry Townhomes, to demonstrate compliance with Minnesota noise standards as it relates to noise emanating from the restaurant, and to ensure minimal impact on the existing ambient sound level environment at the residential area. A single sinusoidal, swept frequency point source was used to represent sound level projections of voice and music from the deck and patio. This single; swept frequency component does not represent the various harmonics (or frequency components) that are inherent to a persons voice, crowd noise, or music. The swept sine wave, at any point in time, represents only a singular portion of the spectrum covered by the human voice, crowd noise, or music; thereforel is not an accurate representation of the noise that will be emanating from the restaurant. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) A single sinusoidal, swept frequency point source is as illustrated below: a a c a 1 The human voice, consisting of multiple frequency components, is as illustrated below: too ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) So, which of the following waveforms best illustrates the noise emanating from the restaurant/bar? A question to pose to the reader — ®o the Minnesota Vikings use a single sinusoidal, swept frequency point source to emulate crowd noise when they are practicing for a big game? I think not! They use the sounds of the stadium, as recorded from earlier encounters, to emulate the conditions of the game. This is the same approach that the sound level assessment should have taken. A real -world accounting of the noise sources, whether it be voice and /or music. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) A single sinusoidal, swept frequency point source was used to represent sound level projections of voice and music from the deck and patio. This is a flawed assessment. I count a total of seven (7) , exterior speaker sources. This means that there are seven (7) sources of, in phase, noise emanating from the exterior of the building. This does not include the addition of existing ambient noise, crowd noise emanating from the balcony, or noise generated from within the- restaurant/bar. In phase noise and the principal of constructive and destructive interference are illustrated on the next slides. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) Constructive interference is depicted in the picture below. Constructive interference, or additive properties of sound waves, shows that the amplitude of two in phase waves add to form a resulting wave of higher amplitude; therefore, greater sound level. combined wavefornn wave 1 wave 2 Two waves in phase ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) Destructive interference is depicted in the picture below. Destructive interference, or subtractive properties of sound waves, shows that the amplitude of two out of phase waves subtract to form a resulting wave of zero amplitude; therefore, no audible sound level. combined waveform wave 1 wave 2 Two waves 180' out of phase ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY E Since the seven (7) speaker sources are playing the same music, most of the frequency components will be additive. As mentioned previously, this does not include the in phase harmonics (or frequency components) of the existing ambient noise; crowd noise, or any other sounds emanating from within the restaurant/bar. The provided sound level assessment for the Pinstripes Restaurant falls short in that it does not accurately represent the noise sources (and associated sound levels) emanating from the interior and exterior of the building. The reason — It does not accurately account for all noise sources and the real - world noise being generated from those sources. ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY EXCERPTS (CONTINUED) Existing ambient sound level measurements were carried out on Saturday, (allay 15th, 2010, between the hours of 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 pm. These conditions were selected to represent a typical Summer evening when the Pins .tripes Restaurant deck and patio would be in operation. Since the Pinstripes restaurant/bar is planned to be open throughout the entire year, this small sampling of ambient noise levels is inadequate. A true sampling of ambient noise levels would be taken during Spring, Summer, Fall, and winter. In addition, this sampling does not address the presence of patrons on the patio or deck, in the winter months, while enjoying the proposed outdoor, wood burning fireplaces. The above statements transition to discussions on weather conditions, moisture in the air, the reflective nature of water /ice with - respect -to sound, and a whole host of other issues that were not addressed in the provided Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. THE POND AS A REFLECTOR OF SOUND Sound reflects from water (or ice) due to the fact that water (or ice) is denser than air. The principle of refraction is a bit more complicated than that, but the essence of the argument is still sound. No pun intended. The simulation in the figure below shows the effect of sound waves being (totally) refracted from the surface of the water. The complete refraction is due to the angle of incidence of the sound with - reference -to the surface of the water. .. n2ini= 0.22 simwr i faster 1111���111 1111 illillillillillilljllIIIIIIIIIIIII Ili- 911 0, 1 11 111111'= The point to be made by the previous slide, and its associated figure, is that sound is reflected from the waters (or ice) surface. There is no significant damping effect (suppression, attenuation) or reduction in the sound level as it hits the waters surface; therefore, the sound continues to propagate (or travel) down range — meaning to the other side of the pond and the Centennial Lakes Park residential area. The question is raised — Why was this phenomena (standard Physics) not included in the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment? THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE INVERSION ON SOUND WAVES The picture below, and the text which follows on the next slide, defines the effects of sound waves traveling in the presence of a temperature inversion. Please pay special attention to the text highlighted in red on the next slide. •„Ivmt _ T \ coat \y` L ,_.. THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE INVERSION ON SOUND WAVES (CONTINUED) A temperature inversion is when the temperature is coolest right next to the ground and warmer as you increase in height above the ground. Since the temperature increases with height, the speed of sound also increases with height. This means that for a sound wave traveling close to the ground, the part of the wave closest to the ground is traveling the slowest, and the part of the wave farthest above the ground is traveling the fastest. As a result, the wave changes direction and bends downwards. Temperature inversions most otters happen at night after the sun goes down when the ground (gar water .ire a lake) cools cuff quickly, while the air above the ground remains warm. This downward refraction of sound is why you can hear the conversations of campers across the 4ak.e. THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE INVERSION ON SOUND WAVES (CONTI N U ED) The discussion and analysis related to the effects of temperature inversion is not discussed in the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. This is yet another illustration as to the lack of completeness of this sound,study. OTHER QUESTIONS /CONCERNS Is there going to be a police presence at the Centennial Lakes Park after closing? This is a concern because of the issues already documented at the park after hours — noise, vandalism, loitering, and the like. - Since the park closes at midnight, why would Pinstripes be allowed to be open beyond the park closing time? ® If outdoor amplified music were to be allowed at the Pinstripes Restaurant, would that set a precedence for other restaurants .(or establishments) such as, Chuck E Cheese's to petition for outside amplified music? Would this not upset the aesthetic nature of the park? OTHER QUESTIONS /CONCERNS_(GONTINUED) - The last paragraph on page one states that "no simulated Y signals were generated from the triangular part of the upper deck. 77 So, this means that no simulated or real -world noise assessment was performed with- regards -to an open deck, with a proposed fireplace, that people will obviously sit around, drink, talk, and smoke during the Spring, Summer, Fall,: and Winter months. This is another part of the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment that is missing. OTHER QUESTIONS/CONCERNS (CONTINUED) - The statement made in the last sentence on page six, paragraph one states the following — "The conditions were selected to represent a typical Summer evening when the Pinstripes deck and patio would be in operation. of The comment made in paragraph two, sentence two, on page one clearly states that the Pinstripes establishment will operate year round. So, the question arises — Why not evaluate real -world sound levels from the open deck, containing a proposed fireplace? I assume the intent is to allow patrons to warm themselves, drink, talk, yell, and smoke during the Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter months? Is it not? believe this use -case would be a valid assessment criteria for this study. Why was this not included in the study? OTHER QUESTIONS/CONCERNS (CONTINUED) The last paragraph on page six states the following — "Statistical distributions of sound level at Site 2 are shown on Figure 4.2. Traffic noise, especially at 5 pm on a weekday is considerably higher than during other periods." On the same page in the first paragraph, second sentence, it states the following — "These readings were taken on Saturday afternoon and evening, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:00 prn. " So, which is it? During the weekday at 5 :00 pm, or on Saturday, May 15, 2010, between 5:30 and 6:30 pm and 10:00 and 11:OOpm? The inconsistent nature of the statements made in the study bring into question the thoroughness with which the study was carried out. CONCLUSIONS There are many reasons, as stated in the above slides, why the completeness of this sound study be called into question. A few of the issues are reiterated below. - A lack of accounting for all of the known sources of noise, whether it be the human voice, crowd noise, or music. - A sinusoidal swept sine -wave does not represent a true accounting of the various harmonics associated with the human voice, crowd noise, music, or ambient sound levels. - The additive nature, due to constructive interference, is not considered when evaluating the total noise levels from all noise sources. CONCLUSIONS (CONT.INU.E.D)-. - There was no accounting of deck noise during the Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter months. Patrons will be utilizing the proposed outdoor fireplaces and fire pits year round. So, why not include this in your study? - No accounting of the weather conditions on the travel of sound waves across the Centennial Lakes Park ponds. This is a real concern whether the pond is used for water activities in the warm weather months, or the pond is used for ice skating during the Winter months. SUMMARY& RECOMMENDATION believe I have presented, in the above slides, enough evidence to call into question the completeness of the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. It is my recommendation that the City of Edina and its Planning Commission reject the request of Pinstripes Restaurant (its representatives and investors) to lift the restriction on the ban of outdoor amplified music. In addition, I am against allowing outdoor fireplaces and fire pits on :the property. This is due to both the lack of disclosure provided in the original elevations and the fact that a true assessment of the noise sources during the Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter were not considered as part of the Pinstripes Restaurant Sound Level Assessment. SUMMARY &RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED) To clarify myself — I am not against utilizing the property; however, am against any establishment that does not maintain the tranquility and aesthetics of the Centennial Lakes Park and its Residential Community. The Centennial Lakes Park is an oasis in the City of Minneapolis. Every resource in the City of Edina, its residents, its Planning Commission, and its City Counsel must be utilized in order to maintain that environment for all to enjoy. :WYAJMIIN&►lV REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk M Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -63 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -63 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-63 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Cathy & Steve Carlson $100.00 Juried Art Show Marjory Westin Art Supplies Edina Communications & Marketing Department: Edina Community Foundation $107.22 Wacom Bamboo Pen & Touch Dated: August 2, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 2, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk o e REPORPRECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. 111.6 From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action ❑ Discussion El Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Shops at Yorkdale Amendment to Reciprocal Agreement ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached amendment to. Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA) for Yorkdale Shoppes and the City of Edina at 6755 and 6775 York Avenue. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In 1996, the City and Yorkdale Shoppes partners entered into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement regarding the construction of the York Avenue Liquor Store, Cub Foods Store and Retail Center locate east of York Avenue and north of West 68th Street. The requested amendment to the REA is to allow for a new tenant in the Shoppes building of the Center which will operate under the name of "Massage Retreat." The property is Zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District 3. A Spa with therapeutic massage services is allowed as a permitted use within the PCD -3 Zoning District. The REA as currently written prohibits a "massage parlor" and therefore needs amendment to permit the proposed use. Yorkdale Shoppes Partners is now requesting that the City consent to the proposed amendment to allow "Massage Retreat ", a new spa with therapeutic message treatments, to locate within the retail center portion of the site. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment to the Reciprocal Easement Agreement SECOND AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT ( "Second Amendment ") is made as of , 2010, by and between YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Developer ") and THE CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City "). RECITALS A. The City and Developer are owners of certain property located in Yorkdale Shoppes, Edina, Minnesota, which,is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and is contiguous and,adjacent., B. On June 28, 1996, the City and'6eveloper executed ,,.a,certain Reciprocal Easement Agreement (Yorkdale,Shoppes, Edina, Minnesota) (the `.`REA "),which established certain covenants and agreements and granted each, other certain . easements, in,.to, over, 'and across their respective Tracts. The REA was duly filed on December 27, 1997 in the office of the Hennepin County, Minnesota Registrar of Titles as Document No. 2772869. C. On December 2, 2003, Developer.and' City executed an Amendment to Reciprocal Easement Agreement (the "First Amendrn_ent ") which was duly filed on December 10, 2003 in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Document No. 389043 1. D. Developer and City now desire to .f irther amend the Use Restrictions contained Section 7 of the REA as more particularly described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, Developer and the City hereby agree, as follows: f; 1.) Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, each capitalized term used in this Second Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such term in the REA. 2.) Use Restrictions on the Shopping Center. Subsection 7.3.3 of the REA is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following provision: "7.3.3 Fitness Center, Spa. Any health spa, fitness center or workout facility or dance facility except that: (a) a single facility of not more than 3,500 Rentable Feet offering professionally managed and marketed spa services and products including therapeutic massage services offered in connection with the operation of a therapeutic clinic and (b) a single facility of not more than 5,000 Rentable Feet offering supervised fitness and personal training services and related ancillary fitness products and services may be allowed in the Shopping Center (exclusive of the Supermarket Tract). A facility offering spa services and products as set forth in this subsection 7.3.3 shall not be deemed to be a "massage parlor" which would otherwise be prohibited by Section 7.2.2 of this Agreement." 3.) Ratification. Except as specifically modified by the First Amendment and this Second Amendment, Developer and the City hereby ratify and affirm the REA. 4.) Effective Date. This Second Amendment shall be effective on the date hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and the City have executed this Second Amendment to Reciprocal Easement Agreement as of the day and year first above written. N•' • •. D, •.. Name: " /liar , 4 �r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2010, by 'ZGoc;-� the �- 4. g of YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability comp y, on behalf of the company. Notary Public LNNOTARYPUBUC-MINNESOTA RAH ANNE HART Won EVA= Jan. 31, 2013 2. THE CITY: THE CITY OF EDINA By: Name: Title: Mayor By: Name: Title: City'Manger STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2010, by and , the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of THE CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. "Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: LARKIN HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN LTD. 1500 WELLS FARGO PLAZA 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 (952) 835 -3800 [CITY OF EDINA SIGNATURE PAGE SECOND AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT ] 1053870.1 3. Legal Description: 1053870.1 EXHIBIT A TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Yorkdale Shoppes, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4 o e 0 IBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. C. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action Discussion Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Second Reading Ordinance No. 2010 -11 Amending Student Membership Provisions to Boards, Committees and Commissions ACTION REQUESTED: Grant Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2010 -11. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the July 20, 2010 Council meeting the Council granted First Reading to Ordinance No. 2010 -11 allowing the appointment of two non - voting student members to certain board, committees and commissions. At that time it was pointed out that increasing student members on the boards impacted regular members. Attorney Knutson has updated the draft ordinance to mitigate this impact. ATTACHMENT: Draft Ordinance No. 2010 -11 Formatted: Font: 11 pt ORDINANCE NO. 2010`11- ---------- - - - - -- _ - - 4 Formatted: Font: 11 pt - Formatted: Font: 11 pt AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING APPOINTMENT OF STUDENTS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 140.04 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: 140.04 Membership. The Commission shall consist of none eeightrregular members, _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - •------ - - Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt - - - - -- - - a�d4;G6d+Feae two student members.,_appointed bx the Mayor with the consent of a majority _ , Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt of the Council. The student members of the Commission shall be non - voting members ;ate fQ;i Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt vetiRg Fights. and shall serve for a one -year terms. Members of the Commission shall be residents of the City, be appointed for a term of three years and serve until a successor shall Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt have been appointed. Upon termination of a member's term, that member's successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. Members of the Commission shall serve without_ _ _ - Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by majority vote of the Council or pursuant to Subsection 180 of this Code. Commission members who discontinue legal _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt residency in the City shall be deemed to have resigned from office effective as of the date of such discontinuance. Section 2. Section 1469.03 of the Edina City Code - is amended to read as follows: ....... L----------------------------------------------- -- -J 146.03 Membership. The Commission shall consist of 44—ten reoular members and two---- student members appointed�by the Mayor w - - ith_the consent of the majority of the Council.e -- - ---- - - - -- - - - - . The student- members of the Commission shall be non - voting members. All - - - embers of the -Commission ------------- - - - - -- shall be residents of the City and shall be appointed for a term of three years, except that a student members shall be appointed for a term of one year.. Of - the 44 one regular members,_ _ one member shall also be a member of the Planning Commission. Members shall serve until a successor has been appointed.` _,Upon termination of a member's term, that member s_' successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term,JMembers of the Commission shall ;. serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Council or pursuant to Section 180 of this Code. Section 3. Section 700.03 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: 152662x02 RNK:r07 /28/2010 Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Aria], it pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted. Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt 700.03 Community Health Committee. The Community Health Board may establish a community health committee to advise, consult with and make recommendations on matters related to the development, maintenance and funding of community health services. •The _ Community Health Committee shall consist of at least seven (7) re ular members, and twos _ _ __ _ _ student members. ,The student members of the Committee shall be non - voting members Members shall include, if possible, providers and consumers of health care services. All _ •-------------- - -- members shall be residents of the City. Members shall be aPeointed_by the Mayor with the consent of the Council. •No member shall serve more than two consecutive three -Year terms, except the student members shall be appointed fora one -year terms. JThe Community-Health- Committee shall study and advise the Community Health Board regularly on community health activities designed to protect and promote the health of the population by emphasizing the prevention of disease, injury, disability, and preventable death through the promotion of effective coordination and use of community resources and by extending health services into the community. Members of the Board may resign voluntarily or be removed by a maiority vote of the City Council or pursuant to Section 180 of this Code ,• _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ i Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Section 4. Section 801.05 Subd.1 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Subd. 1.`�Fo" Members. The Board shall consist of aiae eight (88) regular members and Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt . The student two student members. who shall be legal residents of the City yq":T@Tft FS_ R qularSe�ea _ _ Formatted: Font•. (Default) Anal, 11 pt _ (74 members shall be adult legal Fesidents 9f the City appointed by the Council to three (3) year -' - terms of office-and student members shall be appointed to a one (1) year term of office Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt Members shall have a demonstrated interest, knowledge,_ability or expertise_in heritage - _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt preservation. If available, at least one (1) member shall be a qualified professional historian, -- _ _ terms of three years ccT r° ^ ^' ^^ ^^ PebP aFy 1, except that a student members _ s _ _ hall be _ - _ _ _ _ _ ------ appointed for a term of one year, commencing on a date determined by the Mayor with th --- ---- --- - --- -- - _ _ architect, architectural historian, archeologist, planner, or the owner of a heritage landmark Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, li pt consent of the Council. A Commission member, following expiration of that member's term, _ - property. •(?ne i1) regular membe;of the Board shall be appointed annually from the Planning_ _ _ --------------------------------------- Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Commission. n.. + + a + + +� Q seFve 9R Upon expiration of a term, a member shall continue to serve until that individual's successor is . @19-61 - _ _ _ �beF. The student members of the Board shall be non - voting members Members of Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt the Board shall serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt majority vote of the Council or pursuant to Section 180 of this Code. Members who discontinue • Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt - - - -- legal residency in the City shall be automatically considered to have resigned from office -' Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt effective as of the date of such discontinuance,`Upon termination of a voting member's term_ _ - - ---- --- - - --- - Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt - - -- - - -; that member's successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term` - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Section 5. Section 805.04 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: orma F tted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt 805.04 Membership. The Commission shall consist of nine regular members and two student members, all residents o_f the Ciot app - in---- by_the Mayor with the consent of a majority_of the _ -mbe%- - - - - - - - - -f _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt members of the Council '^ add +'^^ +^ the ^ ^+'^^ m b the - - _ _ . The student members of the Commission shall be non - voting members `Commission members shall be _ _ - Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt appointed with due regard to their fitness for the efficient dispatch of the functions, duties, and responsibilities vested in and imposed upon the Commission. •Members shall be_appointe_d f_or _ _ - Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt _ _ terms of three years ccT r° ^ ^' ^^ ^^ PebP aFy 1, except that a student members _ s _ _ hall be _ - _ _ _ _ _ ------ appointed for a term of one year, commencing on a date determined by the Mayor with th - Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt consent of the Council. A Commission member, following expiration of that member's term, _ - - Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt _ may be reappointed by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the members of the Council. Upon expiration of a term, a member shall continue to serve until that individual's successor is appointed.•Any individual appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term_ _ _ - Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt for which that individual's predecessor was appointed shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. Members of the Commission shall serve without compensation and may resign _ _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt 152662v02 RNK:r07 /28/20 ] 0 voluntarily or be removed by majority vote of the Council or pursuant to Section 180 of this Code. •Commission members who discontinue legal residency in the City shall be deemed to Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt have resigned from office effective as of the date of such discontinuance. _ _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt -- - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------- One member of the Commission shall also be a member of the Energy and Environment Commission. Section 6, Section-1 220.03 of the Edina City Code_is amended to read as follows: -- Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt 1220.03 Membershp. _The Park Board shall consist of ekwer> -ten regular members and two -' J student members. all residents of the City. One regulaymember shall also be _a member of the _ - - Formatted: Font: (Default) Aria[, 11 pt Board of Education of Independent School District No. 273. ^ ^° memb°, may be a high °^� ^ ^� ` Formatted: Font: (Default) Aria[, 11 pt steden.t. The student members of the Board shall be non - voting members. Members shall be _ _ _ _ _ _ Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt appointed by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the Council; provided, however, that the member from the Board of Education shall be appointed by the Board of Education with the consent of the majority of the Council. Terms shall be threeyears except the Board of _ _ - Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Education member and the student members shall serve one -year terms.•Members shall_serve __ Formatted: Font: (Default) Aria[, 11 pt until a successor has been appointed. Upon termination of a_ member's term, that member's _ -_ _ _ successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term `Members of the-Park Board shall_ Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 11 pt _ serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Council pursuant to Section 180 of this-Code -- _ _ _ _ _ - - J Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt Section 7. Section 1221.03 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Formatted: Font: (Default) Aria[, 11 pt 1221.03 Membership,_The Board shall consist of elevea ten regular members and two student ., members, appointed by the M_ayour with the _ consent of the majority of the Council. ,,;� _ . •The student members of the Board shall be non- voting members. All members of the Board_ shall be residents of the City except that not more _ than three members may be non - residents Members shall be appointed for a term of three •------- - - - - -- --------------- - - -- years except the student members shall be appointed fora one year terms. Members shall •-------------- - serve until a successor has been appointed. `Upon termination of a member's term, that - ---------------------------- member's successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. •Members of the Board_ - - ------- - - - - -- - shall serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed -by a majority vote of the Council�ursuant to Section 180 of this Code. Board members who discontinue legal _ residency in the City shall be deemed to have resigned from office effective as of the date of such discontinuance. Section 8. Section 1225.03 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: 1225.03 Membershp. The Commission shall consist of tep -nine re ular members and two , •-- -- - - -- --------- ----- - - - - -- --------------- -- student members appointed by the Council. The Council shall endeavor to appoint members _ such that the Commission is reflective of the different geographic areas of the City. ,One regular member of the Commission shall also be a member of the Planning-Commission. •One regular _ ' •-- member of the Commission shall also be a member of the Bike Edina Task Force or any ; ; . ------------------------ - - - - -- - -- existing similar organization, or shall otherwise have an expertise or interest in bicycling as a mode of transportation. The student members of the Commission shall be non - voting members. Memk°rs 0-11 sewe umil ° r k-n k ° °^ appointed- bll members of the Commission shall be residents of the City and shall be appointed _ _ - Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt for a term of three years except any student member shall be appointed fora term of one year, commencing on a date determined by the Council. Members shall serve until a successor has 152662x02 RNK:r07/28 /2010 been appointed,-Upon termination of a member's term, that member's successor shall be -------- appointed for the remainder of such term. Members of the Commission shall serve without ------------------------------------- compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Council or ,pursuant to Section 180 of this Code. Commission members who discontinue lesal residency in the City shall be deemed to have resigned from office effective as of the date of such discontinuan Section 9. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. - First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Formatted: Font: 11pt CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2010. •----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - -- Formatbed: Font: 11 pt City Clerk 152662v02 RNK :r07 /28/2010 �1Z.1A, �RPOPA 1888 VI, 'Cl CO 0 �y /, REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. D. From: James Hovland Mayor Action Discussion El Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -68 Setting the Interim City Manager Salary ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -68 setting the salary for the Interim City Manager. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Heather Worthington assumed the duties of Interim City Manager following Gordon Hughes retirement on July 30. In consideration of her additional duties and responsibilities, I recommend that the Council authorize additional compensation for her during her service as Interim City Manager. The recommended salary of $128,000 represents an approximate 10% increase in Ms. Worthington's salary during the interim period. Mr. Hughes' salary at the time of retirement was $142,981. Attachment: Resolution No. 2010 -68 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -68 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SALARY FOR THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed Heather Worthington as the Interim City Manager; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: During such time as Heather Worthington serves as the Interim City Manager of Edina, her salary on an annualized basis shall be $128,000.00. The other terms and conditions of her employment shall remain unchanged. ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 2nd day of August, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 www.cityofedina.com 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 o e Cl) O less REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.E From: Heather Worthington Interim City Manager N F] El Action Discussion Information Date: August 2, 2010 Subject: Request Authorization To Grant Apply For Local Government Renewable Energy ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff and EEC members to apply for a Local Government Renewable Energy Grant through the Department of Energy (DOE). INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This grant would achieve the following renewable energy goals, as described in the EEC's Green Step Cities program: 1. Provide a renewable energy source to help power City Hall in the form of flat panel solar arrays. 2. Provide an education and outreach mechanism through the tracking and sharing of data provided by that solar array. 3. Provide a demonstration project to illustrate the use of modern solar technology to the broader community. This grant would require a city match of approximately $18,000, which would leverage approximately $200,000 in grants. This match could be paid for from contingency funds in the 2010 Budget. Staff is also exploring the possibility of an in -kind match of employee time, and other sources. Additional information about the match will be provided at the Council meeting. Agenda Item III.E. Request Authorization to apply for Local Government Renewable Energy Grant CITY OF EDINA SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC PROJECT • Located on Roof of City Hall Building • 20 kw system will generate approximately 12% of building's electricity • Approximately 95 solar panels will lie flat on roof • Display inside City Hall educates public on energy • Grant Funding Available from federal stimulus funding • Deadline to Apply: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 • Total Cost of Project: $205,000 • Federal stimulus grant - $82,000 • Xcel Solar Rewards rebate - $44,000 ■ In -kind donation of materials and supplies by Enhanced Home Systems - $60,000 ■ Funding needed from City - $18,700 • Electricity savings at 6cents /kwh - approx. $1,800 /yr • Return on Investment • City receives $205,000 project for $18,700 • Energy savings pays for city investment in less than 10 years, at current electricity rates Recommended by Edina Energy and Environment Commission • GreenStep Cities Best Practice — Renewable Energy • Reducing City Greenhouse Gas Emissions — ICLEI & Mayors Climate Protection Agreement • City Leads by Example -- Solar (City Hall), Geothermal (Public Works), Home Energy Squad /Edina Go Green (Community wide) • Provides real -time data and educational opportunity for linking with community education and Edina school district R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 1 7122/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336853 7/22/2010 124501 4 SEASONS DANCE CO. 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/26/10 241353 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336864 7/22/2010 100612 A.M. LEONARD 508.32 PRUNER, RAKES, SHOVELS 00002307 241200 C110083454 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 508.32 336855 7/22/2010 101833 A.T.O.M. 100.00 LEGAL UPDATE 240975 25994854 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 336866 7122/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 70.00 240895 0806743 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 157.60 240896 0812859 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 31.00 240897 0812856 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 30.40 240898 0806737 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 67.80 241054 0812834 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.60 241055 0812855 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 40.20 241056 0806738 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 72.60 241057 0806637 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 80.20 241058 0724064 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 117.60 241059 0724071 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 49.60 241060 0724110 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 40.05 241279 0812877 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 14.00 241280 0724159 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 55.60 241281 0724160 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 904.25 336857 7/22/2010 102872 ADAMS GOLF 371.37 MERCHANDISE 241021 91335459 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 371.37 336858 712212010 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 32.92 ALARM SERVICE 241201 28166526 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 32.92 336869 7122/2010 101166 AHEAD INC 433.48 MERCHANDISE 241022 INV0056747 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 433.48 336860 7/22/210 126930 AIR SPORTS WATCH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/2112010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/2212010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 215.00 WATCHES 241023 1419 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 215.00 336861 7/2212010 112033 ALLDATA 1,609.13 DATA SERVICES 00005518 241354 18657429 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,609.13 336862 712212010 103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 38.48 GAFFERS TAPE 241130 RTLINV07123 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 38.48 336863 712212010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 264.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241164 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 264.00 336864 712212010 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 288.00 GIFT SHOP HELP 241165 071610 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 288.00 336865 7/2212010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 14.25 BLEACH 240803 1388032 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 92.56 TRAYS, PAPER TOWELS 240803 1388032 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,275.61 FOOD 240803 1388032 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 14.25- CREDIT 240804 1385308 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,368.17 336866 7/2212010 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 1,768.73 POOL EQUIPT REPAIRS 240805 35921 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 69.02 SODIUM SULFATE 240806 35941 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 341.48 POOL LEVOLOR SENSOR 00007192 241355 35968 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 309.88 PUMP REPAIR 241356 35977 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 86.87 CHEMICAL FEED TUBE 241357 36008 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 2,575.98 336867 7/2212010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 240807 JULY2010 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 240807 JULY2010 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 240807 JULY2010 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 73.92 240807 JULY2010 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 81.29 240807 JULY2010 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 82.85 240807 JULY2010 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 83.66 240807 JULY2010 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GEN ADAPTIVE REC CLASS REGISTRATION 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING LITTER REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK CLUB HOUSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 336868 712212010 Council Check Register 100266 AT &T MOBILITY 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 88.77 240807 JULY2010 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 99.35 240807 JULY2010 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 146.78 240807 JULY2010 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 197.25 240807 JULY2010 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 232.79 240807 JULY2010 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 238.25 240807 JULY2010 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 264.90 240807 JULY2010 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 264.91 240807 JULY2010 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 309.03 240807 JULY2010 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 424.03 240807 JULY2010 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 592.03 240807 JULY2010 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GEN ADAPTIVE REC CLASS REGISTRATION 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING LITTER REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK CLUB HOUSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,290.80 336868 712212010 100266 AT &T MOBILITY 53.12 240808 870517029X70210 5420.6188 53.12 336869 7/22/2010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 80.27 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 241358 3332 1400.6215 178.04 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 241359 3327 1400.6215 258.31 336870 7/22/2010 100638 BACHMAN'S 143.57 YEWS 00006278 240953 22274 5422.6541 143.57 336871 7/22/2010 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 121.29 LAPTOP BATTERY 00004348 240976 018- 206494 1554.6710 121.29 336872 7/2212010 125190 BEDDOR, WILLIAM 48.00 REFUND FOR LAWN GAMES 241360 071510 1600.4390.15 48.00 336873 7/22/2010 126950 BEECK, DAVID 14.00 CLASS REFUND 241361 070710 5101.4607 14.00 336874 712212010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 4.74- 240899 53790800 5642.5515 2,370.13 240900 53962800 5842.5513 1,158.85 240901 53967900 5842.5512 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GEN ADAPTIVE REC CLASS REGISTRATION 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING LITTER REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK CLUB HOUSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 4 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 117.10 240902 53962600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186.55 240903 53967800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 52.44 240904 83887900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 148.83 240905 83888100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 244.55 241061 53968000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 246.82 241062 83888000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 544.14 241063 5952600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 43.00 241282 54059700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,014.60 241283 54060000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,270.70 241284 54058500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 24.21 241285 83924100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 138.52 241286 83924200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,555.70 336876 7/22/2010 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 483.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241166 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 483.00 336876 7/22/2010 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 PERFORMER 7/8/10 241362 070810 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336877 7/2212010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 5.20 MECHANICAL PENCIL 240809 WO- 620786 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 5.20 336878 7122/2010 126962 BLAIS, AMY MARIE 33.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 241363 071210 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 33.00 336879 7/2212010 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 887.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241167 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 887.00 336880 7/22/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 79.70 STORAGE BOXES 00001175 240977 61040 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 79.70 336881 7/22/2010 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 100.00 PROSECUTING 241202 47649 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 13,987.50 PROSECUTING 241203 JUNE302010 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 14,087.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7122/2010 — 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336882 712212010 125248 BONNETT, WALTER 61.81 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 241364 071610 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES SERVICES CUSTODIANS FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 5 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 61.81 336883 7/2212010 126945 BOONE, JIMMIE 150.00 FLOOR BUFF 241365 199977 5841.6162 150.00 336884 7122/2010 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 289.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003760 240978 80444338 1470.6510 2,244.43 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003760 240979 87163136 1470.6510 2,534.33 336885 712212010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 815.00 241287 100012 5862.5513 506.50 241288 100010 5842.5513 1.321.50 336886 712212010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 22.87 AERIAL KIT 00001067 240810 419930 1553.6530 22.87 336887 7/2212010 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 175.10 CANDY 240811 2340:024378 5421.5510 175.10 336888 7122/2010 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 182.26 MERCHANDISE 241024 1001748966 5440.5511 192.00 MERCHANDISE 241025 1001749974 5440.5511 1,228.15 MERCHANDISE 241026 1001749973 5440.5511 1,602.41 336889 7/2212010 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 7 /27/10 241366 070110 5631.6136 200.00 336890 7/22/2010 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 PERFORMANCE 7 /29/10 241367 070110 5631.6136 175.00 336891 7/2212010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN SERVICES CUSTODIANS FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 5 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 13,633.27 ASPHALT 00001210 240812 8130MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5110.6564 5110.6103 5112.6103 5110.6103 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5514 13,633.27 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5515 336892 7/22/2010 5822.5514 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 553.12 MERCHANDISE 241027 920924605 322.27 MERCHANDISE 241028 920493913 164.82 MERCHANDISE 241029 921602646 121.90 MERCHANDISE 241030 921549853 102.90 MERCHANDISE 241031 921593579 102.90 MERCHANDISE 241032 921577658 99.70 MERCHANDISE 241033 921537453 99.70 MERCHANDISE 241034 921565380 98.00 MERCHANDISE 241035 921529706 90.00 MERCHANDISE 241036 920924598 809.55 MERCHANDISE 241037 921621879 2.564.86 336893 7/22/2010 106316 CALTON, BOB 54.75 SUPPLIES 241168 071610 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241168 071610 354.75 336894 7/22/2010 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 8.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 241169 071610 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241169 071610 188.00 336896 7/22/2010 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,276.25 240906 11490 44.80 240907 11488 60.30 240908 11482 152.40 240909 11484 2,533.75 336896 7/22/2010 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 67.10 LINING RINGS 00001071 241204 534645 67.10 336897 7122/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 608.54 240910 86890 116.00 240911 86917 266.00 241064 86918 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5110.6564 5110.6103 5112.6103 5110.6103 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS, SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page- 6 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 990.54 336898 7/22/2010 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10.50 240813 070210 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.23 240813 070210 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 34.69 240813 070210 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 35.11 240813 070210 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 38.68 240813 070210 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 39.37 240813 070210 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 48.53 240813 070210 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 52,17 240813 070210 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 103.60 240813 070210 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 115.65 240813 070210 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 121,17 240813 070210 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 277.10 240813 070210 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 402.64 240813 070210 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 408.89 240813 070210 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 437.83 240813 070210 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,233.67 240813 070210 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 4,837.46 240813 070210 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 8,319.49 336899 7/22/2010 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 9,132.48 241131 2017432 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 197.04 241132 2017422 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 389.64 241133 2016922 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 9,719.16 336900 7122/2010 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.26 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 240954 68442 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 151.26 336901 712212010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 350.00 240912 422709 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 231.25 241289 423013 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 581.25 336902 712212010 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 8,445.91 LABORATORY SERVICES 00005925 240814 JUN2010 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 8,445.91 336903 719°' -°10 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 45,926.50 JOINT POWERS - 2ND QTR 241368 48171 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45,926.50 336904 7/2212010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page- 8 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP CITY HALL GENERAL GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 169.39 00103426- 0203158000 240815 203158000 -7/10 1552.6189 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 282.60 00103426 - 0203158108 240816 203158108 -7/10 1552.6189 721.31 00101025- 0203610011 240817 101025 -7/10 1628.6189 507.10 00101025- 0203600013 240818 203600013 -7/10 1628.6189 577.00 00082050- 0200650018 240819 2000650018 -7/10 1551.6189 77.88 00082198- 0200815001 240820 200815001 -7/10 1375.6189 643.25 00082050- 0200650009 240821 200650009 -7/10 1551.6189 154.91 00114064- 0203502012 240822 203502012 -7/10 4091.6189 451.61 00114064 - 0203163012 240823 203163012 -7/10 4091.6189 66.69 00102561- 0203163003 240824 203163003 -7/10 5861.6189 349.15 00102561- 0200862003 240825 200862003 -7/10 5821.6189 1,247.54 00103426 - 0203502003 240980 203502003 -7/10 1552.6189 5,248.43 336906 7/22/2010 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.92 WINDOW CLEANING 240826 467235 5861.6180 16.49 WINDOW CLEANING 240826 467235 5821.6180 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 240826 467235 5841.6180 57.40 336906 7122/2010 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 1,232.13 SCBA PARTS 00003739 241369 133894 1470.6530 1,232.13 336907 7/2212010 123941 CLAY, CAROL 150.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241170 071610 5110.6103 150.00 336908 7/2212010 116304 CLAY, DON 207.38 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 241171 071610 5125.6103 207.38 336909 7/22/2010 102166 CLEVELAND GOLF 597.60- CREDIT 241038 3112723CA 5440.5511 826.00 MERCHANDISE 241039 3149899SO 5440.5511 271.91 MERCHANDISE 241040 3152155SO 5440.5511 182.10 MERCHANDISE 241041 3236339SO 5440.5511 135.95 MERCHANDISE 241042 3252152SO 5440.5511 SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page- 8 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP CITY HALL GENERAL GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 74.70- CREDIT 241205 3104664NO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.70- CREDIT 241206 3121756NO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.70- CREDIT 241207 3121757NO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 596.26 336910 7/22/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 438.10 241290 0118021324 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 438.10 336911 7/22/2010 120433 COMCAST 112.56 8772 10 614 0220686 241208 220686 -7/10 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 112.56 336912 7122/2010 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 224.62 WIRE, REBAR, WIRE REEL 00001174 241134 0050119 -IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 323.03 CURE & SEAL 00001174 241135 0050118 -IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 547.65 336913 7/22/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 73012 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008080 241209 71165 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 6,097.41 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008081 241210 70921 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 356.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008082 241211 71164 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 7,183.53 336914 712212010 124807 CORVAL CONSTRUCTORS INC. 796.01 HVAC REPAIRS 241212 784619 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 796.01 336915 712212010 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 818.66 TOP SECTIONS 00005927 241136 S000020486 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,111.50 CONCRETE RINGS 00001316 241213 S000020527 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,930.16 336916 7122/2010 120536 DAKOTA WILD ANIMALS LLC 290.00 FAMILY FEST SHOW 240827 544 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 290.00 336917 7/22/2010 104020 DALCO 510.22 MATS 00006057 240828 2228122 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 395.27 ROLL TOWEL 00009204 241214 2212594 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 905.49 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 10 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336918 7/22/2010 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 385.00 240913 711105 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 754.60 240914 711104 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 539.00 241291 711106 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,678.60 336919 7/2212010 102286 DAVANNIS 147.00 CITIZENS ACADEMY MEAL 241370 197749 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.67 EDINA HS LAST DAY LUNCH 241371 197758 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 190.67 336920 7/22/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,286.97 240915 560215 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 24.80 240916 560214 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 342.65 240917 560213 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,823.50 241292 560212 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,477.92 336921 7122/2010 104940 DEFENSIVE EDGE 700.00 COURSE REGISTRATION 241372 071610 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 336922 7/2212010 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 65.27 BAKERY 240829 338321 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.19 BAKERY 240830 338546 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 97.00 BAKERY 240831 338552 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 60.63 BAKERY 241215 338772 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 46.15 BAKERY 241216 338991 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 355.24 336923 7122/2010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 5,818.21 SURCHARGE - JUNE 2010 241137 1027 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 5,818.21 336924 7122/2010 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 117.14 FILTERS, KIT 00001020 240981 802121984 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 5,823.62 GRIND LAZER 00001036 241138 802122420 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 5,940.76 336925 7/22/2010 126948 DILLE, BENJAMIN 15.50 CLASS REFUND 241373 071410 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 15.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 — 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336926 7/22/2010 121268 DIRK, ALEX 47680 PT MAINTENANCE 241172 071610 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page- 11 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ' SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 476.80 336927 7/22/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 7,921.58 CHEMICALS 00001215 240832 82700966 -10 5915.6586 459.78 CHLORINE 240833 82700953 -10 5311.6545 8,381.36 336928 7/22/2010 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 9,222.27 FA -2 00001209 240834 71568 1314.6517 9,222.27 336929 7/22/2010 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 122.60 MERCHANDISE 241043 440618 5440.5511 122.60 336930 712212010 114277 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE 94.95 DISHWASHER SERVICE 240982 W69382 1470.6180 94.95 336931 712212010 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 146.81 CONNECTORS 00001170 241139 07325300 1470.6406 429.10 WIRE 00001167 241140 07280901 1322.6530 575.91 336932 7/2212010 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 195.96 JUNE WASHES 240983 4291 1553.6238 195.96 336933 7/22/2010 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 102.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 00009228 241217 83338,83339 5111.6406 102.73 336934 712212010 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 350.00 CORNELIA 5K RUN 240984 071410 1428.6010 350.00 336935 7122/2010 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,577.48 CATCH BASIN PARTS 00001221 241218 NN2184 5932.6536 1,577.48 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page- 11 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ' SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 394.51 CITY OF EDINA 336937 Council Check Register 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 7/22/2010 -7/2212010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 336936 7/22/2010 122601 EUROSPORT 100.50 156.91 LIFEGUARD UNIFORM 240835 53136208 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 52.27 LIFEGUARD UNIFORM 240836 53136208'1 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 185.33 LIFEGUARD UNIFORM 240837 53136208.2 5311.6201 LAUNDRY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING LEGAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 7/2112010 7:50:13 Page - 12 Business Unit POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 394.51 336937 7/22/2010 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 100.50 241065 862327 5862.5515 100.50 336938 7/2212010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 205.35 BRAKE PAD KITS, OIL SEAL 00001072 240838 69- 014984 1553.6530 16.06 RESISTOR ASSEMBLY 00001281 241219 70- 018568 1553.6530 216.07 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS, SEALS 00001281 241220 69-015400 1553.6530 437.48 336939 7/22/2010 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 621.90 COFFEE 240839 53179137 5421.5510 621.90 336940 7/22/2010 122649 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 528.22 FOOD 240841 7412244 5430.5510 528.22 336941 7122/2010 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 403.99 EDINA LIQUOR LOGO SIGNS 240840 190 -38221 5841.6406 403.99 336942 7/22/2010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 566.80 SIGNAGE 00002310 240985 ACCT 82715 5630.6406 566.80 336943 7/22/2010 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 144.82 AD FOR BID 241221 22245780 1120.6120 144.82 336944 7/22/2010 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 9,109.95 TURN -OUT GEAR 00003768 241374 6674 1470.6552 9,109.95 336945 712212010 101476 FOOTJOY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVERTISING LEGAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 7/2112010 7:50:13 Page - 12 Business Unit POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/2112010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 193.46 SHOES 241044 3252063 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 193.46 336946 7122/2010 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 118.00 EMISSIONS TEST 00001184 240842 0151469450 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.00 336947 712212010 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 239.40 INSTRUCTOR AC 241173 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 239.40 336948 7/22/2010 100467 FRASER, SCOTT 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/28110 241375 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 336949 7/2212010 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,483.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241174 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,483.00 336960 7/22/2010 100764 G & K SERVICES 64.91 240843 063010 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 195.30 240843 063010 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 250.78 240843 063010 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 317.62 240843 063010 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 484.30 240843 063010 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 618.55 240843 063010 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 885.75 240843 063010 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,617.21 ' 336961 7/22/2010 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 285.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241175 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 285.00 336952 712212010 124641 GEYEN GROUP 480.94 CARPET CLEANING 00006069 241222 2759 5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 480.94 336963 7/22/2010 104662 GILLIS, LOUISE 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241176 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.00 336954 712212010 119936 GLOBAL OAK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 37.50 AQUATIC CTR E- COMMERCE 240955 010723 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 37.50 PARK & RE E- COMMERCE 240955 010723 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 131.25 ART CTR E- COMMERCE 240955 010723 5110.6103, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225.00 CLP E- COMMERCE 240955 010723 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 356.25 EDINBOROUGH PK BDAY FORM 240955 010723 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 543.75 GOLF LESSON REGISTRATION 240955 010723 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,625.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 240955 010723 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 5,156.25 336965 7/22/2010 101103 GRAINGER 755.51 SMOKING STATION 00001159 240844 9290710210 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 139.65 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00006444 240956 9288776454 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 83.90 SMOKING STATION, TAPE 00001172 241141 9292608859 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 215.05 SMOKING STATION, TAPE 00001172 241141 9292608859 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 74.23 SPOTLIGHTS 241223 9297774662 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 37.12 SPOTLIGHTS 241224 9297774654 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 176.78 WASP SPRAY 00001179 241225 9294790960 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 64.83 EAR PLUGS, WASP SPRAY 00001179 241226 9294790952 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 277.60 EAR PLUGS, WASP SPRAY 00001179 241226 9294790952 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,826.87 336966 7/22/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 188.50 240918 120515 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 870.00 241066 120516 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,161.50 241067 120517 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,220.00 336967 7/22/2010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 473.75 BAR SUPPLIES 241142 071510 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 241227 071610 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 241227 071610 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 533.75 336958 7/22/2010 123946 GREENE, VANESSA 84.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241177 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 84.00 336969 7/22/2010 102126 GREG LESSMAN SALES 148.38 MERCHANDISE 241045 42514 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 148.38 336960 7/2212010 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 7/21/2010 7:50:13 1,015.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 1.015.00 336961 7/2212010 —7/22/2010 102778 HARRIS COMPANIES 468.63 HEATING VALVES Account No 468,63 Business Unit 336962 7/22/2010 071610 126946 HARRISON, ANDREW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48.00 REFUND FOR LAWN GAMES 160001153 48.00 REPAIR PARTS 336963 7/2212010 241376 126947 HART, PATRICIA 1600.4390.15 129.45 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 241377 129.45 5900.2015 336964 7122/2010 UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 101266 HASLER INC. 12852297 96.55 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 96.55 3135542 336966 712212010 CHEMICALS 100797 HAWKINS INC. 241228 1,169.09 CAUSTIC SODA CHEMICALS 1,474.02 CAUSTIC SODA 071610 2,643.11 CRAFT SUPPLIES 336966 7122/2010 241179 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 5125.6103 22.50 MATERIALS 241143 205.00 INSTRUCTION HOSPITALIZATION 227.50 241144 336967 7/2212010 1550.6043 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 180,875.95 PREMIUM 5120.6406 18,348.65 PREMIUM 241180 199,224.60 5110.6564 336968 712212010 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100800 HEDGES, DIANA 022570 128.33 GALLERY SUPPLIES GRILL 191.06 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 319.39 336969 7/2212010 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 224.64 MEAT PATTIES 224.64 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/22/2010 —7/22/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 241178 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240986 160001153 1551.6530. REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 241376 071510 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 241377 5725 KEMRICH 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 240987 12852297 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240845 3135542 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 241228 3137891 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 241179 071610 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 241179 071610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 241143 35247733 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 241144 35241725 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 241180 071610 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 241180 071610 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240846 022570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 16 7/22/2010 — 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 336970 - 7122/2010 101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 184.09 JUNE 2010 BOOKING FEES 240988 3117 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 184.09 3369.71 7122/2010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 4,443.87 PCS FOR ACCESSING 00004377 240989 47899925 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,443.87 336972 7/22/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,250.50 241068 528025 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11.40 241293 528231 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 686.00 241294 528014 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,947.90 336973 7122/2010 103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND 40.00 PERFORMANCE 7/25/10 241378 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 40.00 336974 712212010 126949 HOPFENSPERGER, MARA 14.00 CLASS REFUND 241379 071010 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 14.00 336976 7/2212010 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 438.16 EFD BROCHURES 00003759 241380 30074 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 438.16 336976 7/22/2010 126408 HUFCOR MINNESOTA LLC 4,772.00 PARTITIONS FOR CENTRUM 00002023 241229 1934 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 4,772.00 336977 7/22/2010 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,238.24 CONCESSION PRODUCT 240847 553597 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,238.24 336978 7/22/2010 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 817.07 PRINTER SUPPLIES 00006015 240848 80451 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 817.07 336979 7/22/2010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 55.36 PVC FITTINGS 00001154 240849 613389 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 146.32 PVC FITTINGS 00001162 240850 614106 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 201.68 336980 ' 7122/2010 104167 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 100.00 DUES - TOM JENSON 241381 071310 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 336981 7/22/2010 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 1.27 240851 063010 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 20.92 240851 063010 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 21.22 240851 063010 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.42 240851 063010 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 49.95 240851 063010 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 57.60 240851 063010 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 57.77 240851 063010 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 62.79 240851 063010 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 64.15 240851 063010 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 69.60 240851 063010 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 74.94 240851 063010 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 105.43 240851 063010 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 122.38 240851 063010 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 174.98 240851 063010 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 246.67 240851 063010 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 351.27 240851 063010 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 374.37 240851 063010 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 381.11 240851 063010 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,344.59 240851 063010 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,336.95 240851 063010 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 5,958.38 336982 7122/2010 102136 JERRY S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 10,861.45 STRYKER POWER PROCOT 00003733 241382 0015442 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 10,861.45 336983 7/2212010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 8,314.89 WATER REPORT PRINTING 241145 23182 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 53.64 POSTERS 241146 23180 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 7,200.00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 241230 23183 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 15,568.53 336984 7/22/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 120.00 240919 1399964 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 374.60 240990 1414205 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343.30 241069 1396587 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,527.05 241295 1399984 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.80 241296 1399985 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,771.40 241297 1399987 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.05 241298 1399988 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 67.50 241299 1409002 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 124.70 241300 1399990 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,767.49 241301 1399989 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14,173.89 336986 7/2212010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO 1,269.08 FUNGICIDE 00006273 240957 55010129 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,269.08 336987 7/2212010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 959.36 241070 1871495 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 189.36 241071 1871482 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 408.20 241072 1871493 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.11 241073 1871494 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,758.34 241074 1871497 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,620.30 241075 1871498 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 144.44 241076 1863070 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 483.11- 241077 463921 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11.03- 241078 464524 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 18.00- 241079 464525 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.99- 241080 464587 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.0D- 241081 464523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.02- 241082 464521 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.84- 241083 464522 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10.33- 241084 464518 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.44- 241085 464519 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.20- 241086 464520 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.60- 241087 463370 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120.24 241302 1871480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,382.69 241303 1871483 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 241304 1871484 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,551.38 241305 1871486 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,116.52 241306 1871491 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22.11 241307 1871487 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,111.96 241308 1871489 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .09 241309 1871479 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.37 241310 1871492 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 19 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descnpbon Business Unit 36.11 241311 1871490 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,715.67. 241312 1871488 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 224,24 241313 1871485 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR ' YORK SELLING 62,21 241314 1871477 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 699.12 241315 1871478 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 927.04 241316 1871476 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 320.52 241317 1871475 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 326.39 241318 1871474 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 255.98 241319 1871894 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 32.33- 241320 463574 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19,363.98 336988 7/22/2010 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 53.33 VACUUM BAGS 00006071 241231 012883 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 53.33 336989 7122/2010 126939 KAMMER, JORDAN 135.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241181 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 135.00 336990 712212010 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 315.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241182 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 315.00 336991 712212010 126940 KASER, KAYLA 50.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241183 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50.00 336992 712212010 126924 KEITH'S TARPS INC. 274.60 FUNBRELLA REPAIR 240852 6058 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 213.75 SAIL FOR WATERPARK 240853 6631 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 488.35 336993 7122/2010 126941 KIEFFER, DANIELLE 290.00 ART WORK SOLD 241184 071610 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 290.00 336994 7/22/2010 126963 KIMM, RYAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/15/10 241383 070810 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 336995 7121 -40 116296 KING PAR CORPORATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 20 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.35 MERCHANDISE 241046 2531701 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 56.35 336996 7/2212010 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 43.39 PETTY CASH 241232 071410 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 44.00 PETTY CASH 241232 071410 5631.6235 POSTAGE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 58.00 PETTY CASH 241232 071410 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 145.39 336997 7/2212010 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 168.00 JUNE SERVICE 241147 070110 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 336998 7122/2010 125571 KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC. 1,061.27 TOWER REPAIR 00008063 241233 112193 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,204.22 TOWER TREATMENT 00008073 241234 112176 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 2,265.49 336999 7122/2010 126938 KUISLE, MICHAEL 25.00 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 241148 071510 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 25.00 337000 7122/2010 120511 KUSKE, BRANDON 74.90 GUN BOXES 241384 071610 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.90 337001 7/2212010 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 126.38 TOWING 00001183 240854 65969 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.38 337002 7/22/2010 126929 LAKE IMPROVEMENT CONSULTING LL 443.75 POND TREATMENTS 240958 1002 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 443.75 337003 7/2212010 126428 LAKEVIEW DOORS 320.00 REPLACE WINDOW AT ART CENTER10009214 241235 21527 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 320.00 337004 7122/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 194.53 WASHERS, COTTER CLIPS 00001158 240855 9374235 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 243.71 SCREWS, TAPE, HOLESAW 00001178 241149 9391016 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 438.24 CITY OF EDINA 7121/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7/22/2010 — 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337005 .7/22/2010 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 2,319.01 TOPDRESSING, SAND 00006465 240959 7 /1 /10BRAEMAR 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,055.82 TOPDRESSING 00006465 240960 JULIBRAEMAR 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,374.83 337006 712212010 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 100.00 ANNUAL FEE 00001192 241150 LL -3314 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 100.00 337007 7/22/2010 100858 LOGIS 1,147.00 240856 32396 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,565.50 240856 32396 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,893.00 240856 32396 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,983.00 240856 32396 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,023.00 240856 32396 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,086.00 240856 32396 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,883.50 240856 32396 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 25,581.00 337008 7122/2010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 2,000.50 240920 89452 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 611.31 241321 90093 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,611.81 337009 712212010 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 250.00 ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK 241385 6982 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 337010 7/2212010 101146 MATRIX 420.58 240961 607593722 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 420.58 337011 712212010 124142 MCNAUGHTON, MARY 648.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241185 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 648.00 337012 712212010 126941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,446.25 EQUIPMENT INSPECTION 241236 24020 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,446.25 337013 7/2 >'- -'0 123847 MEDICA R55CKREG LOG20000 48.09 CITY OF EDINA 7/22/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 5,195.97 Council Check Register 5,195.97 337020 7122/2010 7/22/2010 — 7/22/2010 118464 MIDWESTTESTING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337021 80.07 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 241386 MERIDEL STROBEL 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 38.35 ART WORK SOLD 241163 071510 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 80.07 38.35 337022 337014 7/22/2010 126297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 101987 MENARDS 95.12 CEILING FAN 241237 1711 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 122.34 TOOLS, FLASHLIGHT 00002313 241238 99610 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 84.52 FERTILIZER, BRUSHES 00002312 241239 98908 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 301.98 337016 7/22/2010 102281 MENARDS 32.03 SPOT LIGHTS 00006055 240857 54020 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.03 337016 7/22/2010 100886 METRO SALES INC 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 17.56 DELIVERY CHARGES 240962 17902A 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 582.42 COPIER USAGE 241240 371462 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 217.66 COPIER USAGE 241241 371073 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 817.64 337017 7/22/2010 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 56,133.00 SAC FOR JUNE 2010 241151 071410 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 56,133.00 337018 7/22/2010 104660 MICRO CENTER 48.09 MEMORY FOR K IVERSON 00004349 240991 2839466 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS STREET RENOVATION METER REPAIR ART CENTER REVENUES 1,583.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241186 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,583.00 48.09 337019 7/22/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 5,195.97 ASPHALT 00001226 240858 105540MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 5,195.97 337020 7122/2010 118464 MIDWESTTESTING 1,450.00 METER TESTS, REPAIR 00005429 240992 1674 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,450.00 337021 7/2212010 121124 MILLER, NANCY 38.35 ART WORK SOLD 241163 071510 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 38.35 337022 7/22/2010 126297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE STREET RENOVATION METER REPAIR ART CENTER REVENUES 1,583.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241186 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,583.00 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/22/2010 — 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337023 7/2212010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,225.00 STAND PIPE REPAIR 00005932 240859 33658 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,225.00 337024 7122/2010 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 50.00 WEB ADVERTISING 241153 115111 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 250.00 SOUTHWEST JOURNAL AD 241242 115088 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 300.00 337026 7/22/2010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,074.09 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001212 240860 61345 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,074.09 337026 7/22/2010 101316 MMBA 1,666.66 ANNUAL DUES 241152 2010 5860.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,666.67 ANNUAL DUES 241152 2010 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,666.67 ANNUAL DUES 241152 2010 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5,000.00 337027 7122/2010 101796 MPCA 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 00005934 241387 SC -5665 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 337028 7/2212010 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 907.00 MUSIC FOR CHILDREN 241187 071610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 907.00 337029 7122/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 473.00 240921 60668 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 473.00 337030 7/2212010 102551 NFPA 2,187.00 SUBSCRIPTION 241388 071210 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,187.00 337031 712212010 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 87.75 ART WORK SOLD 241128 071210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 87.75 337032 712212010 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 396.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241188 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 337033 7/22/2010 337034 7/22/2010 337036 7/2212010 337036 7/22/2010 337037 7/2212010 337038 7/22/2010 Amount Supplier/ Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396.00 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 67.76 THERMAL ROLLS 00006034 240861 1229970365 5410.6513 240.46 WIRELESS ROUTER 00002117 241243 524776603001 5621.6406 128.92 TONER, BINDERS, PENS 00002117 241244 524776675001 5621.6513 437.14 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 353.76 240963 W10060618 5420.6188 22.30 240964 W10060612 1646.6188 22.30 240964 W10060612 1550.6188 44.60 240964 W10060612 5111.6188 44.60 240964 W10060612 1646.6188 66.90 240964 W10060612 5861.6188 80.85 240964 W10060612 5311.6188 89.20 240964 W10060612 1481.6188 89.20 240964 W10060612 5821.6188 111.50 240964 W10060612 1646.6188 117.95 240964 W10060612 1646.6188 133.80 240964 W10060612 5841.6188 153.27 240964 W10060612 5210.6188 199.87 240964 W10060612 5621.6188 199.88 240964 W10060612 5631.6188 312.20 240964 W10060612 1622.6188 2,042.18 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 128.52 DRILL BITS, OIL 00006275 240965 599741 5422.6406 262.56 CHAIN SLING 00005929 240993 600507 5932.6406 391.08 126951 OLSEN, CHARLES 130.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 241389 5528 GLENGARRY 5900.2015 130.88 123786 OLSON, VICKI 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 241127 071210 5101.4413 69.55 100315 OMEGA INDUSTRIES 58.07 PRESSURE WASHER REPAIR 241245 11351 5620.6180 OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CUSTOMER REFUND ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 24 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME PROGRAM EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION SKATING & HOCKEY MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 50TH ST SELLING 240923 58.07 5822.5513 337039 '712.212010 240924 124697 PARKER, CHELSEA 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 66.46 240925 8267299 -IN 5842.5513 840.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 241088 8266252 -IN 906.46 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 337040 7/22/2010 8267305 -IN 102440 PASS, GRACE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 342.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 644.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 62125012 5421.5510 986.00 GRILL 337041 7/22/2010 5320.5510 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS POOL CONCESSIONS 241246 725.51 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 599.00 2936367 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 585.00 241328 2936368 5822.5513 1.895.06 50TH ST SELLING 241329 2936376 31.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1 28676 337042 7/2212010 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,237.91 620.16 1,060.78 2,918.85 337043 712212010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 654.78 1,289.80 437.40 863.98 57.12 172.30 3.36 326.35 32.50- 788.97 1.12 1,053.46 707.46 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 241189 071610 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 241189 071610 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 241190 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 241190 071610 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 25 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY 240922 8266259 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 240923 8266249 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 240924 8267301 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 240925 8267299 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 241088 8266252 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 241089 8267305 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 241090 8266949 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 240994 62125012 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 241154 62125042 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 241246 61933895 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 240926 2933352 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 241091 2936373 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 241092 2936380 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 241093 2936377 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 241094 2936378 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 241322 2936609 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 241323 2936369 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 241324 2936371 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 241325 3440845 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 241326 2936370 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 241327 2936367 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 241328 2936368 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 241329 2936376 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/2112010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 26 7/22/2010 - 7/2212010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,767.73 241330 2936375 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 693.04 241331 2936374 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 762.22 241332 2936372 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,546.59 337044 7/22/2010 100119 PING 62.09 MERCHANDISE 241047 10306616 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 212.57 MERCHANDISE 241048 10314999 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 274.66 337045 7122/2010 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 2,789.63 ICE CONTROL SALT 00001180 240862 217994 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,789.63 337046 7122/2010 124031 PLUS ONE SERVICES 541.80 T- SHIRTS 00009340 241247 2958 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 541.80 337047 7122/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 110.88 TIRE 00001134 240863 658014 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.88 337048 7/22/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 880.00 EDINA ART CENTER POSTAGE 241126 071310 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 880.00 337049 7122/2010 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES 6,261.45 LIGHTING CABINET 00005858 241155 32934 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 6,261.45 337050 7/22/2010 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 320.00 RADON STUDY 00001313 240995 10010.05 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 790.00 WATER QUALITY STUDY 00001314 240996 09026.07 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,110.00 337051 7/22/2010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 544.55 TOWELS, TISSUE, WIPERS 00002319 241248 4831 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 377.95 LINERS, TISSUE, GOJO 00002319 241249 4844 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 915.28 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS, GLOVES00002319 241250 4819 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,837.78 337062 7122/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,591.94 240927 327747 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,443.91 240928 330672 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 224.80 240929 330771 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,385.17 240930 330670 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.60 240931 330393 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 398.73 240932 330769 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,424.20 240933 330392 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 774.20 241095 330391 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,800.02 241096 324496 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 464.00 241097 330770 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 384.00 241098 330394 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,939.41 241099 330671 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 44.00- 241333 328001 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15,806.98 337053 712212010 126424 QUINN, MATTHEW 225.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241191 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225.00 337054 7122/2010 123898 QWEST 133.98 952 285 -2951 240997 2951 -7/10 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.50 952944 -1841 240998 1841 -7/10 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 58.54 952 944 -6522 241390 6522 -7110 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 250.02 337066 7122/2010 124329 RADISSON HOTEL 330.64 CONFERENCE LODGING 241391 071310 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 330.64 337056 7/2212010 104460 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 252.00 WATER BILLS MAILED 240999 4296 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 252.00 337057 7/22/2010 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 119.95 SAFETY SHOES 00001193 241000 725000001208 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.00 SAFETY SHOES 00001193 241000 725000001208 5620.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 269.95 337058 7/22/2010 119864 RHINO 412.66 MARKING POSTS 00005926 241001 35142 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 412.66 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337059 7/22/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 105.00 DILLY BARS 241251 511 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 17.99 CAKE 241252 510 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 122.99 337060 7122/2010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 24.14 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 241002 00237114 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102.73 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 241003 00237760 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 126.87 337061 7122/2010 126964 ROBINSON, AUDREY 80.07 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 241392 071610 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 80.07 337062 7/22/2010 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 350.50 DUES - JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 240966 38 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 350.50 337063 712212010 105634 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA/MORNINGSI 212.00 DUES - HEATHER WORTHINGTON 241156 1806 1120.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 212.00 337064 7122/2010 101682 S & S WORLDWIDE INC. 348.91 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 00007198 241004 6661375 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 348.91 337066 7122/2010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 253.91 WASTE DISPOSAL 00001185 240864 51218748 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL 253.91 337066 712212010 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 43.12 BAKERY 241005 286523 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 43.12 337067 7/22/2010 118168 SANSIO 761.61 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 241393 INV017880 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING 53.44 SANFAX FOR HEALTH EMS 241394 INV017757 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING 815.05 337068 7/22/2010 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 1,020.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241192 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,020.00 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 28 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 29 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION WELL HOUSES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337069 7/2212010 126006 SHAFER & FELD INC. 719.48 WATER BILL STUFFERS 00001315 241157 253231 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 719.48 337070 712212010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 1,080.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 241193 071610 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,080.00 337071 7/22/2010 126831 SHIN, CHO SOON 21.00 CLASS REFUND 241395 071410 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 21.00 337072 712212010 120997 SHIRTYSOMETHING 264.05 PARADE SHIRTS 00003767 241006 19308 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 264.05 337073 7122/2010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 270.00 CLASSROOM RENTAL 241158 8416 5310,6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 270.00 337074 7/22/2010 102936 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 5,236.64 NEW FREEZER 00006340 240893 6136 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 880.86 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 241007 6079 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 205.00 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 241008 6080 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 162.50 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 00006340 241253 6545 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6,485.00 337075 7/22/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 881.00 CLEANING / MAINTENANCE 241194 071610 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,047.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241194 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,928.00 337076 7122/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 762.45 SHOWER SWITCHES 00007195 240865 S2221463.001 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.41 THREADED ROD 00001155 241009 S2227870.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.51 PIPE CUTTER, WHEELS 00001155 241010 S2225345.002 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 857.37 337077 712212010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 103.91 TUBE ASSEMBLY 00001055 240866 SI79478 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 103.91 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 29 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION WELL HOUSES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337078 7/22/2010 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 232.96 SUBSCRIPTION 241254 1808753 -2010 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5120.6406 5110.6103 5631.6136 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6180 1553.6530 1553.6530 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1180.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7121/2010 7:50:13 Page - 30 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ADVERTISING LEGAL ELECTION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 232.96 337079 7/22/2010 126942 STITT, KATHY 74.56 GALLERY OPENING SUPPLIES 241195 071610 74.56 337080 7/22/2010 106452 STONE, HOLLY 1,000.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241196 071610 1,000.00 337081 7/22/2010 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 7/27/10 241396 070110 150.00 337082 7/22/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 90.84 HARNESS 00005357 240867 236839 332.04 SWITCH, CASE ASSEMBLY 00001052 240868 247697 255.79 CONDENSER 00005770 240869 249174 392.45- CREDIT 240870 249464 255.79- CREDIT 00005770 240871 CM248667 255.79 - CREDIT 00005770 241255 CM249174 89.95 VEHICLE REPAIR 00001177 241256 575137 41.28 KEY 00001073 241257 250804 484.84 RADIATOR 00001065 241258 249800 390.71 337083 7/22/2010 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 166.29 MERCHANDISE 241049 452486 41.96 PARTS 241259 449740 41.96- PARTS CREDIT 241260 899646 166.29 337084 7/2212010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 35.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 241261 1263531 85.80 PUBLISH ORD 2010 -14 241262 1263533 207.35 PUBLISH ORD 2010 -10 241263 1263532 328.90 337086 7/22/2010 126955 SUNDBERG, KATE 5120.6406 5110.6103 5631.6136 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6180 1553.6530 1553.6530 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1180.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7121/2010 7:50:13 Page - 30 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ADVERTISING LEGAL ELECTION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 7/2112010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 31 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 124.05 PROGRAM INSTRUCTION 241397 071910 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 124.05 337086 7122/2010 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 41.33 380007460384 240872 070410 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 41.33 380007460384 240872 070410 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 41.34 380007460384 240872 070410 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 124.00 337087 7122/2010 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 476.50 FUNGICIDE 240967 6183 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 476.50 337088 7122/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 28.48 CAR CHARGERS 241159 27732 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.48 CAR CHARGERS 241159 27732 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 113.92 CAR CHARGERS 241159 27732 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 113.92 CAR CHARGERS 241159 27732 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 284.80 337089 7/22/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 958.00 240934 MVP01124 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 958.00 337090 7/2212010 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 778.83 MOVIES 240873 RG1458758 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 778.83 337091 712212010 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 240874 885892 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 38.00 337092 7122/2010 104932 TAYLOR MADE 173.00 MERCHANDISE 241050 14290092 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 173.00 337093 712212010 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 138.67 FAIRWAY POLES 00006259 240968 5130280 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 138.67 - 337094 712212010 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 314.20 240875 599141 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Council Check Register Page - 32 7122/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,058.00 - 241264 00771688 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,068.35 241334 599745 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,440.55 337095 7/22/2010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 106.25 DRAFT MINUTES 6/15/10 241265 M17788 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 200.00 DRAFT MINUTES 7/06/10 241266 M17816 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 306.25 337096 7/2212010 101474 TITLEIST 1,311.66 GOLF BALLS 241051 1802428 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 683.70 MERCHANDISE 241052 1801636 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 341.60 MERCHANDISE 241053 1804057 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,336.96 337097 7122/2010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 63.12 WELDING GAS 00006276 240969 313344 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 39.48 WELDING TANKS 241267 404198 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 102.60 337098 7/2212010 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 250.48 CREDIT CARD READERS 241160 25597 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 250.48 CREDIT CARD READERS 241160 25597 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 250.48 CREDIT CARD READERS 241160 25597 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 751.44 337099 7/2212010 123649 TOWMASTER 47.55 PUMP KIT 00001283 241268 322417 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.55 337100 7122/2010 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 27.66 FITTING CAPS 00001015 241011 0000043540 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 27.66 337101 7122/2010 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 55.90 ART WORK SOLD 241129 071210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.90 337102 7/22/2010 124697 TUORILA, SHERYL 64.35 ART WORK SOLD 241125 071210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 64.35 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 33 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337103 7122/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 591.10 SPINDLE 00001186 240876 JI32854 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,081.20 RAKE PARTS 00006272 240970 JI32674 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,672.30 337104 7/2212010 126926 TWIN CITIES SIGN INSTALLATIONS 300.00 INSTALL SIGNS 240877 380 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 300.00 337105 712212010 100363 U.S. BANK 22.66 LUNCH 241398 071610 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.88 SHIPPING (UPS STORE) 241398 071610 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 65.99 SHOES (GENERAL SPORTS) 241398 071610 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 118.55 TEXTBOOK (BARNES & NOBLE) 241398 071610 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,664.85 SUPPLIES 241398 071610 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,924.93 337106 7/22/2010 116379 U.S. BANK 136.49 MEETING EXPENSE 240878 070210 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 17.90 NET ZERO 241399 JUL2 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 81.30 INTERNET 241399 JUL2 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 235.69 337107 7122/2010 101049 UHL COMPANY 2,100.00 RECOMMISSIONING PROJECT 241269 50631 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 525.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 241400 50697 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,625.00 337108 7/22/2010 126926 ULTIMATE EVENTS 527.23 STAGING FORSHOWMOBILE 00007197 240879 15134 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 527.23 337109 7122/2010 126032 UNISELECT USA 23.88 AUTO SUPPLIES /PARTS 240880 063010 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,588.58 AUTO SUPPLIES /PARTS 240880 063010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,612.46 337110 7/2212010 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 69.00 UNIFORMS 241012 063010 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 1,383.83 UNIFORMS 241012 063010 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,452.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337111 7/2212010 101063 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 76.95 RECEPTICAL BOXES 00001153 240881 329048 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.28- RETURN CREDIT 00001773 240882 259885 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.67 337112 7/22/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 137.36 LOCATING FLAGS 00005907 240883 184948 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 137.36 337113 7/22/2010 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS. INC. 368.39 PAGERS 241013 T0319246G 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5.35 PAGERS 241401 T0317426G 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.66 PAGERS 241401 T0317425G 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 388.40 337114 7/22/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 647.63 TOWELS, LINERS, CUPS 00006347 240884 165219 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.90 CUP LIDS 241270 166093 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.92 CUPS 241271 165219 -01 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 230.59 ROLL TOWELS 241272 166420 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,014.04 337116 7/2212010 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 186.95 286364630 -00001 EDINA AQUATIC 241014 2423371657 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 79.41- 485964020 -00001 EDINA AQUATIC 241015 2419975242 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 107.54 337116 7/2212010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,050.00 GOLF CART LEASE 00006023 241273 49116 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 1,050.00 337117 712212010 126327 VINOANDES 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 34 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE 50TH STREET GENERAL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION GOLF CARS 178.10 241100 1524 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 178.10 337118 7/22/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 147.75 241335 0027857 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 912.00 241336 0027830 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 337119 7/22/2010 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 42.98 BLEACH, DEGREASER 240886 28570868 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 35 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 762.91 CONCESSIONS 240886 28570868 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 655.56 CONCESSIONS 240894 28561713 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 17.54 SPONGES 241016 28594072 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 633.30 CONCESSION PRODUCT 241016 28594072 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 267.92 POPCORN 241274 28515946 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 106.97 TOWELS, LINERS, TISSUE 241275 28612777 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 757.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 241275 28612777 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 3,244.69 337120 712212010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 22.24 BULBS 00001171 241161 15158679 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 22.24 337121 712212010 104106 WAACK, SUSAN 50.00 CLEAN -UP SERVICES 241402 #9 -2010 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 50.00 337122 7/2212010 126943 WALKER, RILEY 75.00 MUSIC AT GARDEN SHOW 241197 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 75.00 337123 7/22/2010 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 122.91 MEMBERSHIP CARDS 00009225 241276 36157 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 122.91 337124 712212010 126927 WAREHOUSE WINERY 624.00 241101 0241 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 624.00 337126 7/22/2010 104681 WEBB, DONNA 32.00 SUPPLIES 241198 071610 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 327.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241198 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 359.00 337126 712212010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 604.25 241102 247041 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 318.30 241103 246896 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 537.00 241104 246897 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 116.00- 241105 246754 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,343.55 337127 7121' -"40 101312 WINE MERCHANTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2010 - 7/2212010 7/21/2010 7:50:13 Page - 36 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365.60 241106 324661 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,183.41 241107 324777 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 241108 324005 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 840.96 241109 324008 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 241337 324831 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 589.23 241338 324775 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,389.28 241339 324776 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,422.78 241340 324774 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 96.00 241341 323297CORR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,889.50 337129 7/22/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 510.43 240935 425392 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 651.24 240936 422587 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 32.14 240937 427088 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 48.00 240938 427093 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,022.95 240939 427089 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.10 240940 427090 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,155.65 240941 421669 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,594.78 240942 427086 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 121.05- 240943 805395 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 78.58- 240944 805209 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 196.45- 240945 805210 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,168.25 241110 427084 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 158.65 241111 426901 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 111.25 241112 421112 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 60.05 241113 423656 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,386.95 241114 421664 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,079.48 241115 427083 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,492.25 241116 421665 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,439.16 241117 427087 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,721.20 241118 427091 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,314.86 241119 421668 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 122.44 241120 427092 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 158.65 • 241121 426902 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 53.10- 241122 805396 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 583.66- 241123 805397 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,953.30 241342 428690 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 903.30 241343 428458 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13,716.50 241344 421670 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 159.20- 241345 805226 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2010 7:50:13 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 37 7/22/2010 -7/22/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283.89- 241346 805401 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 64,366.65 337170 7122/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 95.00 240946 630848 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,668.05 240947 630833 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING 22.00 240948 630834 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 22.00 240949 631931 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,256.65 240950 631930 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,556.88 241347 633817 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,009.40 241348 631061 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 152.40 241349 631351 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,769.40 241350 631350 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 22.00 241351 633578 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,604.85 241352 633576 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16,178.63 337131 712212010 126944 WOODWARD, HALEY 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 241199 071610 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 337132 7/22/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 899.50 240951 251087 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 615.00 240952 251088 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,593.12 241124 251089 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,107.62 337133 7/22/2010 123911 WRAP CITY GRAPHICS 3,039.69 NEW SIGN 00006041 240887 10 -276 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,039.69 337134 7/22/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 319.99 51- 4197645 -8 241017 245244005 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 4,949.66 51- 5888961 -7 241018 245283629 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP . 3,827.19 51- 5619094 -8 241019 245272486 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 32,604.77 51 -4605640 -1 241020 245642918 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 1,859.32 51- 6840050 -6 241403 246019497 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 3,503.11 51- 6227619 -3 241404 245830292 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 9,686.71 51- 6955679 -8 241405 246016713 1551.6185' LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 56,750.75 337135 712' 0 100668 XEROX CORPORATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/2112010 7:50:13 Council Check Register 103584 XPEDX Page - 38 7/22/2010 — 7/22/2010 6,212.14 ABOUT TOWN PAPER Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 59.58 COPIER USAGE 241162 048922436 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 121.64 COPIER USAGE 241277 048992555 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 181.22 337136 7/22/2010 103584 XPEDX 6,212.14 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004200 240971 9011899045 6,212.14 337137 7/22/2010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 8,506.16 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 240888 988015 14,356.80 UNLEADED FUEL 00001010 240889 988966 11,453.00 UNLEADED FUEL 00001010 240890 988812 10,706.86 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 240891 988811 982.61 DIESEL FUEL 00006404 240972 988455 611.47 GAS 00006403 240973 988456 826.64 GAS 00006403 240974 988454 47,443.54 337138 7/22/2010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 411.17 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 241278 54166164 411.17 937,534.14 Grand Total 2210.6123 1553.6581 1553.6581 1553.6581 1553.6581 5422.6581 5424.6406 5422.6581 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE 5621.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 937,534.14 Total Payments 937,534.14 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 498,016.46 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 17,831.02 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND. 4,122.01 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 16,685.07 05100 ART CENTER FUND 22,951.23 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 591.10 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 21,237.59 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 41,527.76 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 14,740.86 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 21,494.23 05800 LIQUOR FUND 199,489.01 05900 UTILITY FUND 72,070.24 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,770.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,007.36 Report Totals 937,534.14 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7/22/2010 - 7/22/2010 We confirm to tthe best of our claims knowledge and belief, comply in all material respects. with the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing policis an procedures d ager 7/2112010 7:51:26 Page - R55CKREG LOG20000 GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/2912010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation .. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 337160'` 7/29/2010 100612 A.M. LEONARD , 558.87 RABBIT REPELLENT, SAWS . 00002310 241783 C110088099 5630.6406 558.87 337161': 7129/2010 102971 -ACE ICE COMPANY 31.60 241620 571259 5842.5515 29.50 241621 0724211 5822.5515 93.00 - 241622 0812878 5842.5515 71.00 q 241863. 0724212 5842.5515 = 56.20 241864 0724158 5862.5515 44.60 - 241865: _ 0724210 5862.5515 _ 162.00 241866 0812876 5862.5515 89.80 241867 571255 5862.5515 i 28.80 241868 560522 5822.5515 102.20 241869 560524 5842.5515 708.70 337162 :.7/2912010 100617 - ADAM'S: PEST CONTROL 96.43 PEST CONTROL 241734 583093 5421.6102 96.43 337163 J7/2912010 104710 ADAMS, MARK 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/2/10 241560 070110 5631.6136 100.00 337164 7129/2010 100676 ALL SAFE INC. 119.53 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 241784 100587 1470.6215 119.53.. 337166. 4129/2010 122161 ALL TIME FAVORITES INC. 300.00 FAMILY JAMBOREE MUSIC, DJ 241561 072210 1624.6406 300.00 337166 7/2912010 100666 AMSAN 53.38 AIR FRESHENER 0.0002100 241785 227033826 5620.6511 53.38 337167 7129/2010 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 768.55 COPIER PAPER 241786 10250569 -00 1550.6406 768.55 337168. 7/29/201n 119976 AP LAWN _ 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 1 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL °SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 PERFORMANCE 8/4/10 241562 070110 CITY OF tuINA PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 Council Check Register 337173 7129/2010 126996 BCA USERS CONFERENCE 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 492.40 FERTILIZER 00002332 241787 CTYED -0610 5650.6540 FERTILIZER 492.40 27.95 ART WORK SOLD 241564 337169 7/29/2010 ART WORK SOLD 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 27.95 1,281.00 FOOD 241735 1391794 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,281.00 241623 54058600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 337170 7/2912010 120996 AVR INC. 54059900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 373.10 1,539.00 READY MIX 00001211 241455 34373 1314.6520 CONCRETE 241871 666.90 5862.5515 241456 34491 1365.6520 CONCRETE 241872 54123200 923.40 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 241457 34719 1365.6520 CONCRETE 54132300 5822.5513 1,000.35 50TH ST SELLING 241458 34791 1365.6520 CONCRETE 538.65 241459 34853 1314.6520 CONCRETE 378.60 241460 35035 5932.6520 CONCRETE 1,333.80 241461 35199 1314.6520 CONCRETE 872.10 241462 35483 5932.6520 CONCRETE 872.10 241463 35540 5932.6520 CONCRETE 8,124.90 337171 7/29/2010 126300 BAUMAN, DOUG 25.88 JURY DUTY REIMBURSEMENT 241838 072610 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 25.88 337172 7/29/2010 102608 BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTER 7/27/GU10 9:13:39 Page- 2 Business Unit PROMENADE GRILL STREET RENOVATION SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/4/10 241562 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 337173 7129/2010 126996 BCA USERS CONFERENCE 106.52 COURSE REGISTRATION 241563 072010 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 106.52 337174 712912010 103910 BECK, MAUREEN 27.95 ART WORK SOLD 241564 071910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.95 337176 7/29/2010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,430.35 241623 54058600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 319.75 241624 54059900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 373.10 241870 54123400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 21.50 241871 54132200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 186.55 241872 54123200 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 142.55 241873 54132300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 38,170.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241516 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 05504.1705.30 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 235.34 241874 83924000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 253.31 241875 83950200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6.26- 241876 83821700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 337176 7/29/2010 106833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 38,170.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241516 071610 05504.1705.30 38,170.00 337177 7/2912010 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 54.95 COFFEE 241788 881003 5320.5510 54.95 337178 7/2912010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 30.19 CUSTOM STAMP 241406 IN -19145 1180.6406 26.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 241407 WO- 633312 -1 1600.6406 394.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 241565 WO- 633605 -1 1400.6513 327.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 241839 WO- 633806 -1 7410.6513 48.25- CREDIT 241840 CP- OE- 206433 -1 7410.6513 35.01- CREDIT 241841 CP- OE- 207288 -1 7410.6513 695.16 337179 7129/2010 120083 BIG LAKE KIDS CLUB .59 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 241842 072210 5300.2039 7.41 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 241842 072210 5301.4541 8.00 337180 7/29/2010 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 74,916.90 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241517 073010 01380.1705.30 74,916.90 337181 7129/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 5.09 LABELS 00001194 241408 61180 1552.6406 102.88 QUARTET BULLETIN BARS 00001194 241408 61180 1646.6406 97.22 BOXES, LABELS 00001191 241566 61160 1552.6406 183.53 BOXES, LABELS 00001191 241566 61160 1260.6406 388.72 337182 7/29/2010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 274.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003765 241789 87166699 1470.6510 1,146.22 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003765 241790 87166229 1470.6510 1,420.42 7/27/2010 9:13.39 Page- 3 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -504 WELL #6 REHAB 5849 RUTH COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF ADMINISTRATION SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -380 69TH ST M &O GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 7/29/2010 CITY OF . MA 100677 CARGILL INC. Council Check Register 41,127.09 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005070 241465 2842196 1318.6525 SALT 7/29/2010 —7/29/2010 41,127.09 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337183 7/29/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 85.00 PROGRAM CASH REGISTER 241414 071710 2.51 HEATER /AC PART 00005653 241409 412308 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2.51 337191 7129/2010 337184 7/29/2010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 907.88 PCR LAPTOP ACCESSORIES 00004345 241411 TFQ8001 925.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 241410 322052 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 925.00 337192 7/29/2010 337185 7/2912010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 53.39 CONCRETE MIX 00001109 241466 1225281 177.00 DOCK DOOR REPAIR 241791 513673S 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 177.00 337186 7/29/2010 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 485.95 BALLFIELD AG LIME 00005970 241464 33959 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 485.95 337187 7/29/2010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 6,010.68 ASPHALT 00001210 241843 8144MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 7,778.81 ASPHALT 00001210 241844 8150MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 13,789.49 337188 7/29/2010 119465 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page- 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH PARK FIELD MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION 871.05 241625 11592 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,274.40 241626 11597 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 70.20 241627 11595 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 337189 7/29/2010 100677 CARGILL INC. 41,127.09 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005070 241465 2842196 1318.6525 SALT 41,127.09 337190 7/29/2010 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 85.00 PROGRAM CASH REGISTER 241414 071710 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 85.00 337191 7129/2010 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 907.88 PCR LAPTOP ACCESSORIES 00004345 241411 TFQ8001 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 907.88 337192 7/29/2010 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 53.39 CONCRETE MIX 00001109 241466 1225281 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 5 Business Unit ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 217 85 241628 423014 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 217.85 337197 7129/2010 106402 CHURCHILL, LEE 459.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241832 CITY OF EDINA 4077.6103 R55CKREG LOG20000 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 459.00 Council Check Register 7129/2010 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 53.39 337193 7/29/2010 7129/2010 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 76.17 SIGN - MARKETING 241412 68436 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2.04 TAX ON INV 68412 241792 68412 5621.6575 PRINTING 68.66 COUPON PRINTING 241793 68420 5621.6575 PRINTING 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 146.67 337194 7/2912010 S000020565 124784 CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTORS INC CONCRETE' GENERAL STORM SEWER 277.88 169.61 CARBURETOR 00002309 241467 476299 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 337201 7/29/2010 169.61 102696 CROWN TROPHY 337195 712912010 116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. TROPHIES 00006301 241736 23399 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,201.01 ENVELOPES 241413 27536 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,201.01 337202 7/29/2010 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 337196 7/2912010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 138.92 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 5 Business Unit ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 217 85 241628 423014 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 217.85 337197 7129/2010 106402 CHURCHILL, LEE 459.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241832 072210 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 459.00 337198 7129/2010 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 678.37 RECTANGULAR 6 ROUND SURFACM001238 241468 45568 -0 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 678.37 337199 7129/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 717.40 A/C REPAIR 00008086 241567 71238 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 717.40 337200 712912010 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 277.88 ADJUSTING RING 00001316 241469 S000020565 5932.6520 CONCRETE' GENERAL STORM SEWER 277.88 337201 7/29/2010 102696 CROWN TROPHY 73.48 TROPHIES 00006301 241736 23399 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 73.48 337202 7/29/2010 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 138.92 BRAKE SHOES, DRUM, BEARINGS 00001077 241470 150612 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF t:DINA 7/2712010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 6 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 138.92 337203 7/29/2010 104020 DALCO 1,064.48 MATS 00006057 241737 2230996 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 427.06 CONE CUPS 241738 2231128 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 135.30 GRILL CLEANER 00006330 241739 2232455 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 1,626.84 337204 712912010 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 162.05 DAIRY 241740 071610 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 162.05 337206 7/29/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 44.80 241629 561189 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,403.40 241630 561188 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,193.70 241631 561190 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 67.20 241632 561191 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 51.50 241877 561187 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,474.92 241878 561186 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,235.52 337206 7/29/2010 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 120.08 BAKERY 241741 339156 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 95.21 BAKERY 241742 339237 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 35.93 BAKERY 241743 339324 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 65.38 BAKERY 241744 339494 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 316.60 337207 7/29/2010 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 69.23 MOVIES IN THE PARK POSTCARDS 241471 35747 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 69.23 337208 7/2912010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 459.78 CHLORINE 241568 82701018 -10 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 2,654.47 CHEMICALS 00001215 241794 82701015 -10 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,114.25 337209 7/29/2010 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 59.47 CLAMPS, SEALING COMPOUND 00001187 241415 07338300 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 93.83 GALVANIZED METAL 00001181 241416 07334300 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 241.40 WIRE, SPLICE KITS 00001276 241417 07344800 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 394.70 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page- 7 Business Unit WM -504 WELL #6 REHAB 5849 RUTH POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 31 28 RODS 00001117 241845 MNSSTU32681 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 31.28 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 712912010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 19.31 THERMAL LAMINATION 00001282 241472 Council Check Register 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.31 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337210 7129/2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001027 241572 120648 ELLINGSON COMPANIES 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,540.00 36,052.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241518 8125 05504.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 126986 FOLKERS, KIM 36,052.50 42.00 CLASS REFUND 241573 337211 7/29/2010 CLASS REGISTRATION 122601 EUROSPORT 42.00 784.10 LIFEGUARD WARMUPS 241795 52938273.3 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 784.10 315.28 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1525740 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 337212 7/2912010 315.28 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.79 FILTER ELEMENT, CAP ASSEMBLY 00005753 241418 69- 012440 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 130.88 BATTERY 00001074 241419 69- 015181 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 45.46 FILTERS 00001352 241420 1- 3407185 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 135.66 SENSOR 00001354 241421 69- 015740 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 124.58 REGULATOR, FILTERS 00001352 241422 69- 015698 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 403.99 HUB AND DISC ASSEMBLY 00001301 241569 69- 015403 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 63.03 FILTER ELEMENTS 00001304 241570 69- 015946 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 949.39 337213 7/2912010 126996 FALKENSTEIN, CONNIE 1,072.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 241571 072210 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,072.00 337214 7129/2010 106036 FASTENAL COMPANY 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page- 7 Business Unit WM -504 WELL #6 REHAB 5849 RUTH POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 31 28 RODS 00001117 241845 MNSSTU32681 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 31.28 337216 712912010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 19.31 THERMAL LAMINATION 00001282 241472 131200003918 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.31 337216 7/29/2010 104270 FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDITION/ 2,540.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001027 241572 0019764 -IN 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,540.00 337217 7129/2010 126986 FOLKERS, KIM 42.00 CLASS REFUND 241573 072110 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 42.00 337218 7/2912010 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 315.28 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1525740 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 315.28 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1625740 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 1,891.69 CITY OF EDINA 337219 7/29/2010 Council Check Register 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 FORESTRY SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315.28 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1525740 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 315.28 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1525740 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 315.28 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1525740 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 315.29 PALLET JACKS 00005980 241423 01E1525740 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1644.6406 4086.6103 4077.6406 5422.6406 5422.6530 5630.6530 1553.6530 1644.6541 1644.6541 1644.6541 1644.6541 1644.6541 5401.4593 5912.6406 1322.6406 1301.6556 5620.6610 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page- 8 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TREES & MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE GOLP REVENUES WELL HOUSES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,891.69 337219 7/29/2010 126328 FRESCO 43.82 FORESTRY SUPPLIES 00001101 241473 75913 43.82 337220 7/29/2010 124620 FRESHWATER HARVESTING INC. 11,062.50 WEED HARVESTING ON MILLPOND 00001823 241487 201077 11, 062.50 337221 7/2912010 100776 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 200.00 KICKBALL CHAMP T- SHIRTS 241796 80560 200.00 337222 7/29/2010 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 124.91 PARTS 241797 063010 273.29 PARTS 241797 063010 425.43 PARTS 241797 063010 739.13 PARTS 241797 063010 1,562.76 337223 7/29/2010 103186 GERTENS 124.23 PLANTINGS 00005969 241488 202740 1,271.81 PLANTINGS 00005958 241745 202078 18.17 CEDAR MULCH 00005968 241746 202720 18.17 CEDAR MULCH 00001085 241747 203224 18.17 CEDAR MULCH 00001088 241748 203395 1,450.55 337224 7/2912010 126990 GLENN, TONI 40.00 JR LEAGUE REFUND 241574 072110 40.00 337226 7/29/2010 101103 GRAINGER 118.68 BATTERY, FILTER ELEMENTS 00001279 241424 9299322918 1.30 ELECTRICAL BOX 00001277 241425 9299661645 72.56 CUTTER, WRENCH SET 00001277 241425 9299661645 74.12 FIRST AID CABINET 00002123 241798 9295141536 1644.6406 4086.6103 4077.6406 5422.6406 5422.6530 5630.6530 1553.6530 1644.6541 1644.6541 1644.6541 1644.6541 1644.6541 5401.4593 5912.6406 1322.6406 1301.6556 5620.6610 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page- 8 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TREES & MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE GOLP REVENUES WELL HOUSES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/29/2010 —7129/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 186.52 BALLASTS 00002127 241799 9298372765 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 67.17 FLOODLIGHTS, BULBS 00006421 241846 9233550707 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 520.35 337226 7/29/2010 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING 241426 19851 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 337227 7/29/2010 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 3,642.00 GROUP LESSONS 241749 072210 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,283.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 241847 072310 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 6,925.00 337228 7129/2010 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 1,398.12 CHAINSAW AND SUPPLIES 00001114 241489 12437 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 509.65 HAND TOOLS 00005942 241490 12298 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 1,907.77 337229 7129/2010 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 9,995.00 LIGHTING INSTALLATION 241848 10.481 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 9,995.00 337230 7/29/2010 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/3/10 241575 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 337231 7/29/2010 126992 HARRINGTON, DEAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/22/10 241576 072110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 337232 7/2912010 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 260.00 TOURNAMENT ENTRY FEE 241491 072010 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 666.00 SOFTBALLS 241491 072010 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 926.00 337233 7/2912010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,423.20 CAUSTIC SODA 241577 3139217 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,423.20 337234 712912010 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA 75.35 PIZZA 241750 1704982 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 75.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 337236 7/29/2010 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 224.64 MEAT PATTIES 241751 022591 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1554.6710 224.64 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 337236 7/29/2010 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5110.6151 197.72 LCD MONITOR 00004344 241427 47901310 1,572.13 LASER JET FOR SR. CTR. 00004351 241428 47925856 164.59 LCD MONITOR 00004351 241429 47926457 602.78 LCD MONITORS 00003078 241800 47637718 3,440.95 NEW COMPUTERS 00003078 241801 47641830 18.17 CARRYING CASE 00004350 241849 47955891 964.55 LAPTOP COMPUTER 00004350 241850 47947550 6,960.89 337237 7/29/2010 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 238.55 CLEANERS 00002124 241802 6384726 171.99 FLOOR PADS FOR SCRUBBER 00002126 241803 6386114 410.54 337238 7/29/2010 100806 HIRSHFIELD'S 66.07 PAINT 00002132 241804 003401825 66.22 PAINT 00002136 241805 003402284 132.29 337239 7/29/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MAN UFACTURI 832.02 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005183 241492 87667 832.02 337240 7/29/2010 100806 HOBART SERVICE 108.50 DISH WASHER REPAIR 00006336 241752 25505356 108.50 337241 7129/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 159.00 241633 528712 949.88 241634 528757 56.00 241879 528756 374.50 241880 528755 1,539.38 337242 7/29/2010 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 274.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 241578 071910 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5620.6532 5620.6532 1642.6544 5421.6180 5822.5514 5842.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 1240.6107 PAINT PAINT LINE MARKING POWDER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 10 Business Unit GRILL CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK FIELD MAINTENANCE GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 11 Business Unit EB /CL BALANCE SHEET EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION POOL CONCESSIONS WELL HOUSES FIELD MAINTENANCE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PSTF OCCUPANCY PLAYGROUND & THEATER WELL HOUSES AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description .% 274.00 337243 7/29/2010 126408 HUFCOR MINNESOTA LLC 4,330.00 MOVEABLE WALL INSTALLATION 00002023 241806 1949 5600.1720 BUILDINGS 4,330.00 337244 7/29/2010 122665 HYSER, TIMOTHY 255.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241833 072310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 255.00 337246 712912010 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 186.62 CONCESSION PRODUCT 241430 568787 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 186.62 337246 7129/2010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 39.51 PVC, FITTINGS 00001280 241431 615001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.31 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001105 241493 614652 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 52.82 337247 712912010 113678 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 4.40 PARTIAL REFUND 241579 072110 5300.2039 SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE 27.60 PARTIAL REFUND 241579 072110 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 32.00 337248 712912010 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 292.73 PHONES, INTERNET 241851 7120505 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 292.73 337249 7/2912010 126869 IPEKCI, NATALIE 159.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 241432 072010 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 159.00 337260 712912010 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 48.14 CONDUIT COUPLING 00001284 241433 4283695 -01 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS 48.14 337261 7129/2010 126978 JENSEN, RICHARD 16.73 SEASON TICKET REFUND 241434 071910 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 230.00 SEASON TICKET REFUND 241434 071910 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 246.73 337262 7120' -'40 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 11 Business Unit EB /CL BALANCE SHEET EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION POOL CONCESSIONS WELL HOUSES FIELD MAINTENANCE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PSTF OCCUPANCY PLAYGROUND & THEATER WELL HOUSES AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 12 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 17.55 241635 1411827 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,738.60 241636 1411826 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 10,774.69 241637 1411836 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12.00 241638 1411837 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 768.70 241753 1414268 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 24.50- 241881 989237 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,958.67 241882 1411828 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.80 241883 1379630 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 22,284.51 337264 7/29/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,320.74 241639 1875663 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 63.12 241640 1875658 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 81.12 241641 1875661 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,288.73 241642 1875662 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,297.48 241643 1875665 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,249.38 241644 1875664 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.37 241645 1875667 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING .09 241646 1875657 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,632.20 241647 1875666 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,117.89 241648 1875670 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 189.36 241649 1875659 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 629.48 241650 1875669 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 241651 1875660 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,415.37 241652 1875672 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,070.00 241653 1875673 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 966.95 241654 1875671 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.12 241655 1875668 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 557.34 241656 1875656 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 315.13 241657 1875655 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 259.30 241658 1875654 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,319.90 241659 1875653 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 234.52 241660 1875652 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.48- 241661 465040 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4.15- 241662 465042 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 74.62- 241663 463575 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 147.90 241884 1876128 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 68.44 241885 1876560 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 159.85 241886 1876127 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 308.75 241887 1876129 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 18,750.40 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337255 7/2912010 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER 42.91 REPATCH SHIRTS 241807 072110 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 42.91 337256 7/2912010 126977 LATHAM, DIANNE 75.00 UMN EXTENSION WORKSHOP 241435 25414582 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 75.00 337257 712912010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 260.00 241664 3972 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 260.00 337258 7/29/2010 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 102.26 COPIER USAGE 00001290 241436 1142656 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 102.26 337259 712912010 101453 LUTZ, RICHARD M. 99.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 241580 071910 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 99.90 337260 7/2912010 122472 M & 1 BANK 30.00 SUPPLIES 241852 071410 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 46.20 SUPPLIES 241852 071410 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 156.54 SUPPLIES 241852 071410 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 232.74 337261 7129/2010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 983.79 241888 89556 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 983.79 337262 7/2912010 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 124.27 TOWELS, LINERS 241853 W27826 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 124.27 337263 7/2912010 126910 MARTHA BURNS SWIM SCHOOL 821.69 RETAIL ITEMS 241437 3041002 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 821.69 337264 712912010 110795 MASON- CUTTERS 540.00 CONCRETE SAWING 00001317 241494 M -27803 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 540.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tLANA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337265 7129/2010 126941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,488.00 EQUIPMENT CLEANING 241808 2528281 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 9,318.00 HVAC COMPRESSOR CHANGE -OUT 241854 2528609 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 224.64 REFRIGERANT 241855 2528616 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 11,030.64 337266 7/29/2010 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 1,587.37 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003766 241809 104480 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,587.37 337267 7/29/2010 101987 MENARDS 197.93 HAND TOOLS 00001102 241495 994 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 8.34 HOSE CLAMPS 241810 2901 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 74.80 HOSE 00002318 241811 1351 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 281.07 337268 712912010 102281 MENARDS 50.23 CONCRETE BLOCK 00001097 241496 58259 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 107.02 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00001106 241497 60862 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.00 PEST SPRAY 00006067 241754 59798 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 189.25 337269 7/2912010 104166 MENARDS 252.57 PAINT 00002331 241812 42028 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 252.57 337270 7/29/2010 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 231.71 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001103 241498 125354 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 231.71 337271 7/29/2010 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAT 263.00 RADIATOR 00001303 241581 471109 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 263.00 337272 7/29/2010 104650 MICRO CENTER 28.84 IT SUPPLIES 00004337 241499 2804979 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 106.87 PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS 8 00004352 241813 2850681 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 135.71 337273 7129/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 6,659.93 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 241519 071410 04358.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -358 PAMELA PARK CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14,504.07 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 241519 071410 05492.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -492 PAMELA PARK 16,280.44 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 241519 071410 03449.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS 449 PAMELA PARK 175,908.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 241519 071410 01360.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 213,353.24 337274 7129/2010 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 320.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 241814 072310 5621.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 320.00 337276 7/29/2010 102441 MINING AUGER & TOOL WORKS INC. 309.94 DRILL RENTAL 241815 24281 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION 309.94 337276 712912010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS S SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,715.00 WATER LINE REPLACED 00001322 241582 33662 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,450.00 WATER LINE REPLACED 00001321 241583 33660 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,837.50 WATER LINE REPLACED 00001323 241584 33663 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 6,002.50 337277 712912010 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/1/10 241585 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 337278 7/2912010 101691 MINNESOTA CERAMIC SUPPLY 77.83 KILN ELEMENTS 241586 30243 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 77.83 337279 7129/2010 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS 567.76 POLICE DEPT FORMS 241587 14634500 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 567.76 337280 712912010 126997 MISSION ELECTRIC LLC 252.00 ELECTRICAL WORK 00008087 241588 102609 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 98.00 SCOREBOARD REPAIR 241589 011110 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 88.00 WIRE OUTLET FOR ATM MACHINE 241590 050710 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 136.00 OUTLET REPAIR 241856 051510 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,102.00 LIGHTING REPAIR 241857 060110 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 104.00 REPLACE LIGHT SWITCHES 241858 060210 5423.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF CARS 379.00 LIGHTING REPAIR 241859 060610 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 910.00 INSTALL OUTLETS FOR CHARGERS 241860 061510 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 3,069.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 16 7/29/2010 — 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337281 7/29/2010 101763 MISSION SERVICE SUPPLY INC 323.06 TAPES FOR COUNCIL 241438 4951 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 323.06 337282 7/29/2010 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 PERFORMANCE 8 /5/10 241591 070110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 337283 712912010 102396 MDSE, WILLIAM 484.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241834 072310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 484.50 337284 7/29/2010 126981 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC. 61.00 FOUNTAIN PARTS 00001087 241500 INV19331 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 61.00 337286 7/29/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 172.50 241665 60888 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 172.50 337286 7/29/2010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 739.82 LED LIGHTS 00005777 241593 24691 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 739.82 337287 712912010 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 1,860.57 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241520 073010 05494.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 7,904.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241520 073010 03451.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-451 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 99,871.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241520 073010 04360.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -360 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 138,154.77 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 241520 073010 01362.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 247,790.34 337288 7/29/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 257.20 POTTERY TOOL KITS 00009223 241594 39188000 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 257.20 337289 7/29/2010 126993 NORTHWESTERN BOOKSTORE 862.02 PAYMENT ERROR REFUND 241595 072110 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 862.02 337290 7/2912010 102567 NTOA 150.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 241592 ID #34109 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/29/2010 — 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337291 712912010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 59.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00002314 241501 525434661001 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 59.73 337292 7/2912010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 16.08 CHAIN 00001076 241439 600997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.08 337293 7/29/2010 126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC. 2,060.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 241521 073010 04371.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -371 INTERLACHEN BLUFF 3,516.63 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 241521 073010 03450.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-450 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 15,615.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 241521 073010 01374.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF 18,040.26 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 241521 073010 04359.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -359 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 27,523.17 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 241521 073010 05493.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -493 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 56,249.98 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 241521 073010 01361.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -361 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 123,005.19 337294 7/2912010 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 240.00 POOL DRAIN COVER 241816 2072 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 240.00 337295 7129/2010 102520 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 159.82 FAMILY JAMBOREE SUPPLIES 241440 639291850 -01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 159.82 337296 712912010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 63.42 COOKIES 241596 80090368 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 63.42 337297 712912010 118187 PARETO - HOLLROCKISGD GOLF 40.04 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002333 241817 429389 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 40.04 337298 7129/2010 121311 PAUL, MARCIA 42.00 CLASS REFUND 241597 072110 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 42.00 337299 712912010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 618.25 241666 8267910 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,456.51 241667 8268029 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119.25 241668 8267307 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 848.00 1,442.50 238.00 - 10.00- 4,236.51 337300 7/29/2010 110632 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 657.50 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 657.50 337301 7/29/2010 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 439.23 107.30- 1,574.33 337302 7/29/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 377.00 412.32 69.97 384.85 37.12 636.28 1,240.85 232.91 1,133.68 666.70 887.22 37.12 45.84- 144.30 50.72 6,265.20 337303 7/29/2010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 561.60 561.60 PO # Doc No 241669 241670 241671 241672 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Inv No Account No 8268031 -IN 5862.5513 8267498 -IN 5842.5512 8267786 -CM 5842.5512 8267784 -CM 5842.5512 241818 61210006 241598 62125098 241599 62192878 241755 62125082 241673 2939295 241674 2939293 241675 2939294 241676 2939296 241677 2939301 241678 2939300 241679 2939298 241680 2939299 241681 2939297 241682 2939303 241683 2939302 241684 2939304 241685 3440846 241889 2939870 241890 2940050 241891 10842 337304 712912010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,764.79 TIRES 00001134 241441 648737 240.60 TIRES 00001134 241442 651727 268.00 TIRES 00005810 241443 631920 1554.6103 5320.5510 4075.4521 5421.5510 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5515 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6583 7/27/[U10 9:13:39 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD CONCESSION SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD CENT SERV GEN - MIS POOL CONCESSIONS VANVALKENBURG GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 493.63 TIRES 00001134 241502 668972 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5514 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 1000.1303 1400.6104 5915.6103 4077.6103 1190.6104 bY31I115VA ". 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 2,767.02 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 337306 7/29/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100971 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 843.50 YORK SELLING 241686 333682 -00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 342.40 VERNON SELLING 241687 333762 -00 278.40 241688 333763 -00 956.50 241689 332559 -00 957.38 241690 333786 -00 207.75 241691 332553 -CO 197.80 241692 332552 -00 2,390.70 241693 333680 -00 4,678.81 241694 333681 -00 439.40 241695 333761 -00 582.18 241696 333760 -00 11, 874.82 337306 7/2912010 104146 R.E.C.INC 410,307.41 CLARK TIF NOTE INTEREST OTHER 241861 072610 410,307.41 337307 7/2912010 124329 RADISSON HOTEL 165.32 CONFERENCE LODGING 241600 072010 165.32 337308 712912010 126979 RADON SQUAD INC. 375.00 RENT RADON MONITORS 00001320 241444 1006 375.00 337309 712912010 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 382.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241835 072310 382.50 337310 7/2912010 124578 REAL ESTATE COMMUNICATIONS GRO 99.00 SUMMIT FEE 241601 ID:55006 99.00 337311 7/29/2010 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 18,376.00 PAVERS AND CONCRETE WORK 00002070 241819 3352 18,376.00 337312 7/29/2010 119756 RICCI, PATRICE 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5514 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 1000.1303 1400.6104 5915.6103 4077.6103 1190.6104 bY31I115VA ". 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LANDIMPROVEMENTS ASSESSING EB /CL BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 20 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 186.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241836 072310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 186.00 337313 7/29/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DO GRILL AND CHILL 92.40 DILLY BARS 241820 512 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 36.98 DO CAKES 241821 513 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 129.38 337314 7/29/2010 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 40.89 BAKERY 241756 287211 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 40.89 337316 712912010 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 43.11 LUMBER 00001273 241503 40858572 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 43.11 337316 712912010 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 178.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 241837 072310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 178.50 337317 7129/2010 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 PERFORMANCE 8/3/10 241602 072210 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 337318 7/29/2010 127004 SIGN SOURCE INC. 798.50 SIGN REPAIRS 00002334 241822 25998 5650.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE 798.50 337319 7/29/2010 117179 SIGNAL PRO EQUIPMENT 283.17 MOWER PARTS 00005617 241504 71991 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 75.72 241505 71650 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 75.72- 241506 71651 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 8.95 EDGERS 00001009 241507 72104 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 154.43 MOWER PARTS 00005972 241508 72231 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 223.69 CUTTER HOUSING, SPINDLE KIT 00001165 241509 72247 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 28.27 BELT 00001054 241603 72183 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 698.51 337320 712912010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 47.97 BUSINESS CARDS 241604 65584 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.97 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No" Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337321 7/29/2010 124759 SISTERMAN, MATT 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 241605 072210 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.10 337322 712912010 104672 SPRINT 39.99 DATA CARDS. 241510 666109817 -032 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 11.88 241522 873184124 -092 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.72 241522 873184124 -092 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 51.10 241522 873184124 -092 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 51.53 241522 873184124 -092 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 52.20 241522 873184124-092 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 55.88 241522 873184124 -092 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 56.44 241522 873184124 -092 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 59.62 241522 873184124 -092 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 70.62 241522 873184124 -092 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.55 241522 873184124 -092 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 106.96 241522 873184124 -092 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 111.10 241522 873184124 -092 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 122.96 241522 873184124 -092 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 173.36 241522 873184124 -092 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 201.03 241522 873184124 -092 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 203.31 241522 873184124 -092 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 323.84 241522 873184124 -092 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 388.59 241522 873184124 -092 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 389.18 241522 873184124 -092 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 691.30 241522 873184124 -092 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,289.76 241522 873184124 -092 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 439.89 CARD READERS 241823 312188813 -032 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,006.81 337323 7129/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 57.32 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005838 241511 S2216124.001 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 57.32 337324 712912010 116176 ST. CROIX HARLEY- DAVIDSON 367.26 MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE 241606 569859 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.56 SCRATCH TREATMENT, POLISH 241607 569862 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 379.82 337326 7/29/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 205.34 ALTERNATOR 00001351 241445 5179843 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.11 COUPLINGS 00001370 241862 S178840 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPEP" f)N GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 83.67 CITY OF EDINA 072110 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION Council Check Register 337330 7129/2010 —7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 615.22 OSSI TRAINING COSTS 241609 404.45 2330.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 337326 7/29/2010 OSSI TRAINING COSTS 241610 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 2330.6104 CONFERENCES B SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 2,868.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES 241824 8271 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS DRUG FORFEITURE 1,996.70 1,200.00 241825 8270 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 4,865.47 5,119.72 337327 7/29/2010 127006 STRUVE, JESSE 7/29/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 643.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 241826 071610 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PHONE SERVICE 00001288 241446 27775 643.50 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 337328 7129/2010 126994 STUDWELL, JENNY 337332 7/2912010 85.00 JR LEAGUE REFUND 241608 072110 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES 85.00 241697 Z01143 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 337329 7/29/2010 126956 SUNDBERG, KATE 241892 00483 5862.5514 7/271,&010 9:13:39 Page - 22 Business Unit ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ENGINEERING GENERAL GOLF REVENUES 83.67 TENNIS INSTRUCTION SUB 241613 072110 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 83.67 337330 7/29/2010 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 615.22 OSSI TRAINING COSTS 241609 18946 2330.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 2,104.50 OSSI TRAINING COSTS 241610 20042 2330.6104 CONFERENCES B SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 1,200.00 OSSI TRAINING COSTS 241611 20317 2330.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 1,200.00 OSSI TRAINING COSTS 241612 21914 2330.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DRUG FORFEITURE 5,119.72 337331 7/29/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 99.00 PHONE SERVICE 00001288 241446 27775 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 99.00 337332 7/2912010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,402.00 241697 Z01143 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 845.00 241892 00483 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,247.00 337333 7/29/2010 123284 SURVEILLANCE VIDEO.COM 53.00 VIDEO CAMERA CABLES 00002116 241827 SI- 148658 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 53.00 337334 7129/2010 126989 SWENSON, KEEGAN 40.39 TENNIS INSTRUCTION SUB 241614 072110 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 40.39 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/29/2010 - 7/2912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 337335 7/29/2010 101027 TARGET 93.57 X- XXX -XX9 -840 241757 071810 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 93.57 337336 7129/2010 120325 TCC MATERIALS 292.01 MORTAR MIX 00001188 241447 0000487907 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 292.01 337337 7/29/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 425.00 241758 00771771 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 284.90 241759 599938 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 161.15 241893 600949 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,849.05 241894 600770 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,720.10 337338 7/29/2010 126991 TRELLES, DAVID 100.00 PERFORMANCE 7/29110 241615 072110 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 337339 7/29/2010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 160.32 TURF CARE 00001239 241760 810564 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241761 810565 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241762 810566 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241763 810567 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241764 810568 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241765 810569 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241766 810570 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 37.41 241767 810571 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241768 810572 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 106.88 241769 810591 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 101.54 241770 810592 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 106.88 241771 810593 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 64.13 241772 810594 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 42.75 241773 810595 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.86 241774 810596 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 37.41 241775 810597 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 90.85 241776 815001 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 80.16 241777 815527 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 1,059.21 337340 7 /2°' 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 24 7/29/2010 -7/29/2010 Check # Date 337341 7/29/2010 337342 7/2912010 337343 7/2912010 337344 7129/2010 337345 7129/2010 337346 7129/2010 337347 7129/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,310.56 DOORS 00005850 241512 405235 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,310.56 FERTILIZER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TOOLS FIRST AID SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING TRAINING GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL RECYCLING INSPECTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 157.64 FERTILIZER 00001110 241513 23550 1643.6540 157.64 116379 U.S. BANK 21.46 SUPERAMERICA MULCH 241514 JUL22010 1646.6406 101.85 NOZZLES, COUPLINGS 241514 JUL22010 1646.6406 195.83 BOYERS BLADES, ACME TOOL 241514 JUL22010 1301.6556 241.00 NORTHERN TOOL VISES 241514 JUL22010 5913.6556 268.17 SEARS COMPRESSOR 241514 JUL22010 1553.6556 500.12 GO PROMOS 241514 JUL22010 1552.6406 620.91 PAPA JOHNS 241514 JUL22010 1552.6530 1,125.00 TOLL COMPANY 241514 JUL22010 1281.6104 31074.34 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 601.90 BLADES 00001131 241448 88434512 -001 1301.6556 601.90 122664 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 285.35 OXYGEN 00003649 241828 292772 1470.6510 285.35 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 397.05 TOWELS, LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 241778 166898 -00 5842.6512 45.49 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 241779 166898 -01 5842.6512 20.39 NAPKINS 241780 165219 -02 5421.6406 462.93 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.51 241449 2428693950 5952.6188 67.12 241449 2428693950 1495.6188 130.49 241449 2428693950 1600.6188 142.14 241449 2428693950 1640.6188 267.21 241449 2428693950 1120.6188 284.47 241449 2428693950 1470.6188 923.94 101064 VESSCOINC. FERTILIZER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TOOLS FIRST AID SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING TRAINING GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL RECYCLING INSPECTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 75.88 CITY OF EDINA 241698 0027629 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING Council Check Register r 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /_Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302.64 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 241450 48377 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 55.00 -TISSUE .: 302.64 28622486 531,1.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 337348' 7/2912010 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM CONCESSION PRODUCT 241451 28622486 5320.5510 345.00 FIRE INSPECTION 00068090 241616' 144962 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 92.40 CAN LINERS, CLEANER 345.00 28645473 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 337349' 712912010 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER CONCESSION'PRODUCT 241617 28645473 5320.5510• 374.99 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 00001108, 241515 252421 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 28.58 CAN LINERS 374.99 28664887 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 337360 7129/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA CONCESSION PRODUCT 241.829 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 75.88 241698 0027629 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING t 75.88 337361 7/2912010 T- 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 55.00 -TISSUE .: 241451 28622486 531,1.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 641.33; - CONCESSION PRODUCT 241451 28622486 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL - CONCESSIONS 92.40 CAN LINERS, CLEANER 241617 28645473 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION - 521.44 CONCESSION'PRODUCT 241617 28645473 5320.5510• COST OF, GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 28.58 CAN LINERS 241829 28664887 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 842.51.' CONCESSION PRODUCT 241.829 28664887 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,181.26 337362 7/2912010 101076 WEIGLE, SUE 329.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 241618 072010 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 329.50 337353 7/29/2010 119436' WELLS FARGO 11.30 SUBPOENA CHARGES I 241619 1274492 -98369 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.30 337364 7/2912010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,192.50 241699 247512 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 800.10 241700 247360 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 661.00 241701 247369 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,653.60 337356 7/290010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 840.96 241702 325529 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,742.55 241703 325531 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 395.73 241704 325530 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tUINA 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Council Check Register Page - 26 7129/2010 - 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 223.11 241705 325528 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,202.35 337356 7129/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 631.75 241706 431078 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,096.95 241707 431079 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,053.93 241708 430319 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,497.43 241709 430321 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 3,143.47 241710 430325 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 132.44 241711 430326 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,138.55 241712 430327 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.05 241713 430328 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 75.29 241714 430828 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 391.23 241715 430324 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.65- 241716 805550 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 31.02 241895 430320 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 78.71 241896 427085 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,421.15- 241897 806039 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15,873.02 337357 7129/2010 .03 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2,490.15 126.00 3,838.28 32.00 3,664.35 22.00 237.50 323.00 1,838.26 220.00 1,993.25 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 241717 633842 241718 633843 241719 633844 241720 634109 241721 634108 241722 634107 241723 634106 241724 633845 241725 633840 241726 633841 241727 634728 241728 634729 241781 633155 241782 633598 241898 636619 241899 636618 241900 636400 241901 636401 337358 7/29/2010 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5430.5514 5421.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING BOTH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 337360 7/2912010 43.48 43.48 337361 7/2912010 290.18 290.18 337362 712912010 25,127.16 25,127.16 337363 7129/2010 3,441.38 3,441.38 1,528,979.96 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 5276505 -8 241452 246328157 100568 XEROX CORPORATION JUNE USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00007322 241831 049001989 103584 XPEDX ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004260 241453 9011927541 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC BROOMS 00001289 241454 0129274 -IN Grand Total 1330.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER 1550.6151 2210.6123 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 27 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 1310.6523 BROOMS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,528,979.96 Total Payments 1,528,979.96 STREET CLEANING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/29/2010 — 7/29/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 279.67 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002330 241630 245009 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 279.67 337359 7/29/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 2,075.20 241729 251445 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 293.85 241730 251481 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 899.50 241731 251433 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 327.90 241732 251398 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 219.00 241733 251332 5622.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 337360 7/2912010 43.48 43.48 337361 7/2912010 290.18 290.18 337362 712912010 25,127.16 25,127.16 337363 7129/2010 3,441.38 3,441.38 1,528,979.96 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 5276505 -8 241452 246328157 100568 XEROX CORPORATION JUNE USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00007322 241831 049001989 103584 XPEDX ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004260 241453 9011927541 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC BROOMS 00001289 241454 0129274 -IN Grand Total 1330.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER 1550.6151 2210.6123 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 7/27/2010 9:13:39 Page - 27 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 1310.6523 BROOMS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,528,979.96 Total Payments 1,528,979.96 STREET CLEANING R55CKSUM 10000 CITY L AA 7, 0 9:14:32 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/29/2010 - 7/29/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 521,387.55 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 26,079.76 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 5,119.72 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 474,002.03 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4.076.57 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 136.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 7,088.62 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 17,503.23 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,316.75 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 30,673.71 05800 LIQUOR FUND 128,111.51 05900 UTILITY FUND 157,684.87 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 129,324.03 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.51 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 20,443.10 Report Totals 1,528,979.96 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll ies a d procedures da �. - y�AQ e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. A. DEBRA MANGEN F-1 Action From: CITY CLERK F1Discussion z Information Date: AUGUST 2, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. NJ 7,- -3o -)o 3- P- - Lo 7D I ct,'k tom'- 71ke- NCO rz� pr RECEIVED JUL 3 0 2010 QA-e., RECEIVED rp11 3 01010 Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Subject: Airplane Take -Off Noise Dear Mayor: It is another beautiful, sunny, warm summer morning in Edina, and we cannot sit out on our patio and enjoy the beauty of the flowers in our backyard because of the numerous airplane flights taking off right over our home. We have lived at 6324 Parnell Avenue for over 46 years, and the last three years have been made a living hell because of these flights. It would be different if we lived near the airport, but we are over eight miles away, and yet we get about ten to twelve flights an hour over our home. Ten to twelve flights a day we probably could stand, but every five minutes, or less, is ridiculous. Many of them are very low. When MAC built the new north -south runway a couple of years ago, we were led to believe that they were going to distribute these flights to other areas of the Twin Cities. However, this obviously has not been the case. Is there any way that you could relieve us of some of this noise? We would like to enjoy the benefits of living in the "Crown Jewel" of the Twin Cites suburbs as we were formerly accustomed. Thank you, Philip and Thais Dugan 6324 Parnell Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55435 952 - 920 -1812 651- 789 -2783 Office Edina City Council Members RECEIVED JUL U 2010 Edina has prided itself on giving its residents exceptional service and spending our dollars wisely. Why the switch? How can you condone the Three Rivers Park Board spending upwards of 35 million dollars that they received from Edina via Edina tax payers on a bike path. A bike path yes, but along Nine Mile Creek, through the wetlands, destroying trees, and habitat -NO. The path could wind thru our parks (without destroying trees) use some of the existing park paths, use our streets, eliminate the elevated boardwalk on unstable terrain and provide a safe bike path that all Edina can be proud of. All built at substantially less than 35 million dollars. Thank you, Edina property owners and residents sin a 195 Mary and Jack Ryan 6824 Brook Drive Edina, MN 55439 Deb Mangen From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:21 PM RECEIVED To: Deb Mangen Cc: Susan Howl )III 2 8 ZOO Subject: FW: attn: Deb Mangen, city coordinator Hello there, This message has been forwarded to Deb Mangen and the Mayor and Council members. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum.julie @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:37 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: attn: Deb Mangen, city coordinator Deb, Please distribute this to the Mayor and city council members individually. It would be great if you could also make my correspondece part of the city public record. Thank you for your help. Julie DATE: Jul 28, 2010 TO: Mayor Jim Hovland Joni Bennett Scott Haush Mary Brindle Ann Swensen RE: Pinstripes and wood burning fireplaces Dear Members of the Planning Commission: Even though wood burning is allowed in Edina, it is especially important that Pinstripes not burn wood because it would infiltrate the public park and sidewalks with cancer causing toxic emissions that are implicated in asthma attacks and heart attacks to park users and nearby residents. Gas, which is far less polluting, would be an easy alternative that is healthier for the community. Wood smoke is a frequent barrier to my use and enjoyment of public spaces and personal property as an asthmatic. This is also true for many other citizens and park - goers, including the skyrocketing number of children with asthma. Asthma is a recognized disability under the ADA Americans with Disabilities Act. The town of Mallard, Iowa, in fact, was ordered by a Federal Court to stop the town from allowing recreational wood burning because it presented a physical barrier that prevented "access" to public parks and sidewalks to a small child with severe asthma. This could happen in Edina with the proliferation of wood smoke that is already an air pollution problem. Please require Pinstripes to use gas fireplaces on both levels in order to become a sustainable part of our community. Please disallow "smokers" and wood burning grills at the same time, for they're all the same smoke. Edina parks are already tobacco free, which is wonderful. Wood smoke is chemically almost identical to tobacco smoke. Who needs it? Thank you. Julie Mellum, Edina resident 5700 York Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410 Phone: 952 - 303 -6218 Occupation: Realtor Susan Howl DATE: Jul 28, 2010 TO: RECEIVED Mayor Jim Hovland Joni Bennett JUL 2 8 2010 Scott Haush Mary Brindle Ann Swensen RE: Pinstripes and wood burning fireplaces Dear Members of the Planning Commission: Even though wood burning is allowed in Edina, it is especially important that Pinstripes not burn wood because it would infiltrate the public park and sidewalks with cancer causing toxic emissions that are implicated in asthma attacks and heart attacks to park users and nearby residents. Gas, which is far less polluting, would be an easy alternative that is healthier for the community. Wood smoke is a frequent barrier to my use and enjoyment of public spaces and personal property as an asthmatic. This is also true for many other citizens and park - goers, including the skyrocketing number of children with asthma. Asthma is a recognized disability under the ADA Americans with Disabilities Act. The town of Mallard, Iowa, in fact, was ordered by a Federal Court to stop the town from allowing recreational. wood burning because it presented a physical barrier that prevented "access" to public parks and sidewalks to a small child with severe asthma. This could happen in Edina with the proliferation of wood smoke that is already an air pollution problem. Please require Pinstripes to use gas fireplaces on both levels in order to become a sustainable part of our community. Please disallow "smokers" and wood burning grills at the same time, for they're all the same smoke. Edina parks are already tobacco free, which is wonderful. Wood smoke is chemically almost identical to tobacco smoke. Who needs it? Thank you. Julie Mellum, Edina resident 5700 York Avenue S., Edina, MN 55410 Phone: 952 - 303 -6218 Occupation: Realtor Susan Howl Subject: FW: Deer population RECEIVED .11 11 Z 8 1010 From: Dave Pederson [mailto:dpederson @juddallen.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Laura Pederson Subject: Deer population City Council: I've lived at 5921 Walnut Drive for 20 years and NEVER have I seen problems with deer feeding on my landscaping than I have this year. My yard has been stripped of much of its vegetation. Needless to say, I've spent considerable amounts of money and time to get my grounds looking their best and it is frustrating beyond belief to see it all go to waste. As an experienced gardener, I've been able to control this problem in various ways to varying effect in the past; but this year I've just given up due to lack of effective methods I have employed. In looking around the neighborhood, this issue is not limited to my property either. I would like to know what is being done or will be done to get the deer population back to reasonable levels. I do not want to endure another year like this one. Thank you. David Pederson RECEIVED JUL 2 7 2010 Susan Howl Subject: Fwd: Lino Lakes, MN makes English its official language! To the Edina City Council: Please look into this and see if we are spending taxpayer money for translation services or other such expenses? I would favor such a proposal if it would lower our city expenses. Thank you, Michael DeMoss, Attorney (Edina resident and business owner) ALSO: Please respond with your knowledge and opinions on this issue. Thanks, Mike. Begin forwarded message: From: ProEnglish <mail(a)proenglish.org> Date: July 27, 2010 12:20:37 PM CDT To: Mike DeMoss <lawreyiew(a)mac.com> Subject: Lino Lakes, MN makes English its official language! Reply -To: ProEnglish <mail .Proenglish.org> Lino Lakes, MN makes English its official language! Thank City Councilman Dave Roeser for his efforts and tell your MN Take Action! city council to follow suit by adopting official English! July 27, 2010 Last night, Lino Lakes became the first city in Minnesota to adopt English as its official language. The official English measure, sponsored by City Councilman Dave Roeser, ap ssed the council by a vote of 4 to I. Although the city has never used any money for the kind of translation services covered in the resolution, Councilman Roeser emphasized that the measure will help to reduce city spending in the future: "If somebody needs a translation, that's fine, but taxpayers aren't going to be paying for it." The resolution prohibits the use of city taxpayers' dollars from providing costly translation services for city documents and public meetings, although it did include a few exceptions for education, public safety, and health care. The Lino Lakes' official English measure sets an excellent precedent for other cities and states to follow. TAKE ACTION! Thank City Councilman Dave Roeser for sponsoring and so effectively advocating for official English in Lino Lakes. You can call, email, or write to himhere. The other three council members who voted for the official English measure were Mayor Jeff Reinert, Council Member Jeff O'Donnell, and Council Member Rob Rafferty. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living Project RECEIVER From: Dick Doyle [mailto: rfdmn @earthlink. net] JUL 2 7 2010 Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:49 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Living Project To: James Hoveland, Scot Housh, Ann Swenson, Mary Brindle, Joni Bennett cc: Planning Commission Members Thank you for your favorable vote on Subject. A July 26th cover story in Barron's would indicate that you voted correctly. Barron's predicts, in the next five years, there will be less home ownership and more renters, due to demographic, economic, and other factors (interesting article), I don't think single family homes would have been the best use of such land. With too many homes already on the market, developers wouldn't be overly anxious to build more single family homes in such areas. Property such as Colonial's will be better suited for other use. Richard Doyle 6308 Falcon Court Edina, MN 55436 952 - 926 -6798 1 RECEIVED Susan Howl 0 JUL 2 12010 Subject: City budgets Please forward to Edina City Council Dear Mr. Wallin and Mr. Roggeman, I attended the July 20, 2010 City Council work session on the 2011 budget and appreciate the steps that are being taken to include the enterprise funds, utility fund and communications fund budgets in the annual budget. During a discussion on the format the budget should take, Councilmember Bennett noted that Edina is a Plan B city with unique budgeting requirements. As the League of MN Cities explains: Cities with the Plan B form of government must follow unique budgeting requirements in state law. In these cities, the city manager is responsible for the city budget and sets out the required budgeting structure. State law addresses citizen participation in budgeting, requires that the manager read the budget aloud and respond to council questions. (Handbook, chapter 21, p. 18) M.S. 412.701 lays out the format annual budgets for Plan B cities must follow. As the League of MN Cities Handbook states: One of the most important provisions of Plan B is that the manager must prepare estimates for an annual budget and submit them to the council. The manager must budget on a "funds" basis and must include all city funds except for the bond, utilities, and special - assessment funds. Inclusion of these is optional, but budgeting and appropriations procedures should include all the moneys the city receives and spends. (Handbook, chapter 3, p. 9) Earlier this month I emailed the City Council with information comparing Edina's annual budget to the annual budgets of other Plan B cities and an offer to provide copies of these budgets on disk. Councilmember Bennett requested that I forward a disk to you, which I will leave at the front desk. Please let me know if you have any questions or have difficulty opening the disk. Once again, thank you for the steps you are taking to include the enterprise funds, utility fund, and communications fund budgets in the'City's 2011 annual budget. Sincerely, Jennifer Janovy 952 -92 -4373 Susan Howl RECEIVED Subject: Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail To: Edina City Council, JUL Z 1 1010 I would like to speak out against the Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail for several reasons. First and foremost, I believe that we are in extremely difficult economic times and adding ANOTHER place to recreate in Edina is a cost that is not worth the result. We have beautiful Bredesen Park, many neighborhood parks and the lakes right across our border into Minneapolis. I recreate outdoors everyday here in Edina, all it encompasses is going out your front door and walking. I believe that money should be spent in maintaining the roads, bridges and facilities that we already have in place and that can be used 12 months of the year. (for example, there is a wonderful path /track around Walnut Ridge Park that is in desperate need of attention, i.e.: leveling and new asphalt). Secondly, I see the installation of this path as destructive to much wildlife in our area. We have lived in this neighborhood (Parkwood Knolls) since 1999, and in that time, the Carl Hansen neighborhood expansion phase has uprooted many different wild life. They have no where to go over here. Many of them have settled into the wetlands behind Walnut Ridge Park. Now we are going to bring backhoes and bulldozers in there and eliminate even more of their habitat, and even the wild life themselves may not survive. Thirdly, it is a huge safety concern. 1.) 500,000 complete strangers a year coming through private neighborhoods where there are children playing on playgrounds 5 Ft. from the path. 2.) Many people are under the impression that EDINA has all the park facilities that it needs and that those facilities are state of the art. As we know, this is not the case. There are thousands of children annually that NEED to use our parks for LaCrosse, soccer and hockey in order to accommodate the explosion of adding girls to all sports. Therefore, having a busy bike path running through Walnut Ridge Park, right where there are children crossing to attend their sporting practices is extremely dangerous. There are only 12 parking spaces in that lot as it is. Many evenings there are cars parked all the way up Londonderry Rd just for parents to get their kids to practice or a game. The space that the proposed bike path is on goes right behind houses and in between the rink. Children and parents lives are in danger with the bike traffic that is proposed to be going through that facility. I appreciate your time in reading my concerns. Eva Chapman evachapman(@comcast.net Susan Howl From: ktalbottl @comcast.net [mailto:ktalbottl @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:26 PM RECEIVED To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Director Teagues's staff report/Waters Development PLEASE VOTE NO! JUL 2 2 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: As an Edina resident and baby boomer who is well aware of her senior years approaching more quickly than she expected, I have a number of issues with Director Teague's The Waters Development Report. The lack of respect to the current zoning requirement is the first judgement error. don't think a "maverick" approach is needed nor welcomed here. Clearly not enough thought has gone into a building structure of this size nor have the concerns of the neighborhood citizens been fully taken into account. I don't honestly believe anyone has truly investigated how those of us currently in our middle age years wish to spend our senior years. I can tell you that a complex with 139 units is not where I would like to live and its obvious future trends are not playing a role in this design and for a building that will more than likely be around for more than 30 years, it's only common sense to take a proper percentage of time to make sure the design ✓ill always be current and that can complement the neighborhood. But first the zoning details need to be addressed. PLEASE VOTE NO. Thank you. Kate Talbott 5621 Melody Lake Drive Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please vote "NO" on this project RECEIVED JUL 2 2 2010 We ask you to vote "No" on this project it is bad for our city and neighborhood! Thank you, Farkhod & Madina Salamov 5708 Hawkes terrace Edina MN 55436 - -- On Mon, 7/19/10, Barbara Hoganson <barbarahoganson@comcast.net> wrote: From: Barbara Hoganson <barbarahoganson @comcast.net> Subject: LAST CALL TO EMAIL CITY COUNCIL for JULY 20, 2010 - SEND EMAIL TODAY VOTE NO TO LIVING WATERS STAFF REPORT To: edinacountryside @googlegroups.com Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 1:11 PM THREE VERY IMPORTANT ACTIONS! 1. PLEASE EMAILTHE CITY COUNCILTODAY AND ASK THEM TO VOTE NOTE TO DIRECTOR TEAGUE'S STAFF REPORT OF JULY 20, 2010 re the WATERS DEVELOPMENT! Please read the July 20, 2010 Staff Report Director Cary Teague will present to the City Council this Tuesday at 7 PM at City Hall. Mr. Teague will recommend approval of the Colonial Church and Shelter Corp Final Developer's Application. Staff Report - July 20 2010 - The Waters Development Email your Concerns for your Neighborhood to the City Council at edinamailOci.edina.mn.us, and make sure you copy Jackie Hoogenakker at JHoogenakker(cD- ci.edina.mn.us Ask the Council to VOTE NO to the Revised Colonial Church, (a conditional use permit holder), and Shelter Corporation's Developers Application to build a massive senior apartment complex in a residential neighborhood. The July 20th Meeting is our LAST CHANCE at CITY HALL! We strongly urge the the City Council to VOTE NO to this Application and NOT approve Director Teague's The Waters Development Staff Report. Ask the Council to VOTE No to this application requesting them to respect existing zoning, don't create a spot zoning situation, and don't create a zoning precedent that is detrimental to all areas of Edina . 2. For those neighbors speaking at the July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting, please make sure your talking points address relevant areas of this Staff Report. If you have any questions, ideas, legal or factual arguments that we should address at the City Council Meeting, please reply to this email, or send to info(aD-edinacountryside.com by 5 PM, Monday July 19. 3. ATTEND THE MEETING OF JULY 20, 2010 at 7 PM at CITY HALL! Please refer to the City Council Agenda for July 20, 2010 at the end of this email. Thank you! AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL Susan Howl ubject: FW: NINE MILE CREEK BIKE TRAIL RECEIVED Subject: NINE MILE CREEK BIKE TRAIL -fill 22 2010 To: Edina City Council, My name is Donald Coulter and I live in Minnesota in the summer time. I, too, am appalled that the City of Edina is considering a bike trail along Nine Mile Creek. The 30 million dollar cost of this trail is unthinkable in this economic environment. Spending that kind of money on a trail that is open only 8 months of the year falls right into "out of control spending." How can you consider this trail a priority when Edina is in debt, the state of Minnesota is in debt and our federal government is in debt and Three Rivers Park states they will need funding from all three: Federal, State and local levels? There is no question in my mind that 30 million dollars could be spent in a more productive way. A few examples are: roads, teachers, fix the parks and trails already in existence in Minnesota or, how about, not spending it at all? This very, very expensive project only benefits a few, destroys valuable wetlands, animal habitat, parkland, property values and contributes to the federal, state and local debt. Please be responsible council members and table this bike trail project! Please enter my views in the public record. Donald Coulter Backus, MN Lindabcoulterna gmail.com RECEIVED Susan Howl -1111- 2 2 2010 Subject: FW: vote NO Vote NO !! to the planned Colonial Church senior apartment complex. Keep our Edina 'SUB' urban, not cluttered with Massive'high density' developments. We don't want the traffic, the noise, and another massive building to spoil our RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS!! Sincerely, Philip Johnson, Dorinda Johnson, Michelle Johnson; 5045 Yvonne Terrace Susan Howl Subject: Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail RECEIVED °i!„ 222010 Dear Edina City Council Members, My name is Linda Coulter and I live in Minnesota in the summer time. I have been following this proposed bike trail in the Star Tribune and I am appalled that you, as city council members, would even consider spending up to 30 million dollars on a bike trail in these economic times. I know that Minnesota has more bike trails than any other state in the union and certainly does not need to spend that kind of money on a trail that will destroy the wetlands, displace the animals who call that home, lower property values and is only open 8 months of the year, I think it is outrageous that a city council would consider spending that kind of money to benefit only a few!!! The state of Minnesota is in debt, teachers are losing their jobs, roads need to be fixed and the list goes on! What are you thinking? 30 Million dollars for a bike trail ? ? ?? I would like this letter entered into the public record. Thank you. Linda Coulter Backus, Minnesota Lindabcoulter(n gmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:45 AM To: John Keprios PtECEIVED Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail -tl v1 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citVofedina.com From: Linda Coulter [ mailto:lindabcoulter @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:43 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail Dear Edina City Council Members, My name is Linda Coulter and I live in Minnesota in the summer time. I have been following this proposed bike trail in the Star Tribune and I am appalled that you, as city council members, would even consider spending up to 30 million dollars on a bike trail in these economic times. I know that Minnesota has more bike trails than any other state in the union and certainly does not need to spend that kind of money on a trail that will destroy the wetlands, displace the animals who call that home, lower property values and is only open 8 months of the year, I think it is outrageous that a city council would consider spending that kind of money to benefit only a few!!! The state of Minnesota is in debt, teachers are losing their jobs, roads need to be fixed and the list goes on! What are you thinking? 30 Million dollars for a bike trail ? ? ?? I would like this letter entered into the public record. Thank you. Linda Coulter Backus, Minnesota Lindabcoulter@gmail.com com c f o e Ole loss REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. A. -1 DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion ® Information Date: AUGUST 2, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. 0 Susan Howl I ubject: FW: The Waters From: H Havir [mailto:hhavir @nbs- inc.com] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:16 PM To: Lynette Biunno RECEVVED Subject: The Waters A To: Mayor and City Council From: Harvey Havir Address: 6108 Tracy Ave Re: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Date: July 30, 2010 I was very disappointed by the result of the final vote of the City Council in their approval of the the Waters. To me, this facility is a commercial operation in a residential neighborhood. There are senior residences providing the same services which are non commercial, but that is not what Colonial church is interested in. They should seek to develop these commercial interests in a non residential location. They should sell their land and use the money to purchase property in a non residential area where they can pursue their moral motivations. I am supporting the Edina Neighborhoods in their efforts to review all of the records of these proceedings and to examine whatever actions may be found to be appropriate. RECEIVr7 u 2 2010 Members of the Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: The Waters Senior Housing Proposal RI ` D July 29, 2010 I am writing about the City Council meeting of July 20th in which you addressed the issue of whether to rezone the property on the current campus of Colonial Church. My wife and I are a 20+ year residents of Edina, currently residing at 5529 Village Drive. We are also members of Colonial Church. Regardless of the final decision that you made, I would like you to know that I was very impressed with three things: 1. The amount of time, effort, and intelligent thinking that you all put into the issue. You really added to the information with your questions, your research, and your opinions. Thank You. 2. 1 was impressed with the process. It was orderly, respectful, and effective. You were so patient. You never seemed to be in a hurry and anxious to get the meeting over with and your willingness to listen to everyone spoke volumes. Thank You. 3. This was a successful demonstration of democracy in action. There was an issue that needed resolution, people emotionally and rationally viewed the issue differently, views needed to be heard, and a decision was made. While some won and some lost no one could fairly say that the issue was not fully considered. You all should be proud of the fine way you represented the City of Edina. A job well done. Sincerely, J 10 Susan Howl 4ttachments: E 4712 & Flag246Corner.jpg; E Barberry & Trap Wall Duet.jpg; E Corner Stop Sign & Flag0388.jpg; E Mogul Pine at 20 Years0382.jpg; E Mogul Pine looking West to Pole0379.jpg; E Smoke Tree at 20 Years0386.jpg; E Smoke Tree to Mogul Pine at 20 Years0377.jpg; E Utility Pole at West Corner0385.jpg; E Valley View from Front Door of 4712.jpg -- Original Message---- - RECEtlicq From: bill @steelglassdesign.com [mailto :bill @steelglassdesign.com] AU3 02 My Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:57 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Proposed Improvement No.S -104 Lyentte Attached are Nine photos of our property at 4712 Valley View Rd. Please forward them to the Four Council Members and the Mayor for their review prior to this evenings Public Hearing. Since it's likely that the Project will be approved, our primary interest is in preserving as much of our Landscaping as possible after the installation of a Five Foot Wide Sidewalk without an additional boulevard strip. Jack Sullivan has informed us that the primary reason for selecting the North side is that there is a tree, or perhaps two, which are too close to the curb to accommodate a full width sidewalk without potentially damaging it or them. Our request is that our mature trees be afforded the same consideration. The berm material is compacted Glacial Clay and is shielded from water by layers of heavy 6 mil poly. It does not require any restraint for a pitch less than 12/12, or 45 degrees max. The entire Landscape design was granted a Land Use Permit 20 years ago, and was inspected by the City Engineer during and upon completion. I will be able to work with the designated contractor to install any barrier material deemed necessary other than the standard white limestone with masonry. Mr Sullivan has seen what I am suggesting as an aesthetic and functional solution. I understand that we will not be assessed for the actual costs related to this project, but the reality is that if an Institutional Wall or Boulevard is demanded, we will certainly suffer a negative "Curb Appeal" opinion by an eventual Buyer of our home. Thank you for your assistance. Regards, Bill & Carol Manners 4712 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55424 612 810 0081 1 lot pt IN ` l _ 1 , 5e 1. r r M„+, y f i - ...�"•`"��. .tit; �*; Y� 1 I . . " � ,��• '�'� ...,.� J fi e' s r • _ � . , «,! 'I, ,k �e • it ✓ if WOOL-" ONO r - , ,.�i s ,q 4� # i+S,_ . -=�.,, _ vir' - ..� -tiP p/ -as. :_ •+ f,. , �, �k: ,�r_ t s 1p Ai L i • ,for% i .S \ •- •� �� ° _ tom' � •^ .• %y'� -Y4 t\. r -' j J �. �yr.� t ,..� tnl� �.,. � ' F' ♦w'i „•�, .�5 '` -T - � Y _` �_ � ,�µ't IL W, 4ft ¢4i, f. if IL lie ol JF Ju r it > A 1p' Ir iW4 Ilk Ir . r �'�ti'ri + +, j\ .i t y' `t a �• \ter► ; lo ate. ,..- _ • i- -` °.. ,,.• P ). % f , + VOW. T I 0 jw if so :t' � � t ` J r . '.' r, �J- mss. 1 ~ !f� *'= d � � .. �' " •.str .:. i! is .d �' Via., "�, �.� � �' j, y "... a •'�' �` `�ii �. AA it, • r d . VA •M 1� •' t�/'' •. .IL' • 4 �� � f'- ( ;(ice � � :: `.. Jay � � �'+ � r a � � � � � p � J Y i ! IA Ak IF _* w -y �. ` - rte. 1 ♦h+ OFF, ate 1 y 4. oft � t.31!'' 4rt -� %•»� �. l��" r "4- y�J�•..�a' °'!' `'j A' ��.`r's "" '�.�,'�t`r; � �.�' `�� e {�: `�r,�� ,��,� iy���� •''�. ,f } !err,, w. r °i- ", .�+'qY tyr� �• r . '1%`• � - i`. � r t �yi�,` , /s' � 5%' G e f ♦ r +y \ '+o" '..'{ .i . es} i - it .( i.�� . ',},,` 'J YN� - ` +F K k i 4 `^' ► �y_ � fv a Its y3 ` 1 - 4- j LI1� I �. ".77a �w • Fz.3.. ' .�'.. _ �a /! %.¢S T. IL 11h. r S • lb \ - , . A , • jo`\ F f ;AD qr Ito _# r i N s t 9 r Ak IF _* w -y �. ` - rte. 1 ♦h+ OFF, ate 1 y 4. oft � t.31!'' 4rt -� %•»� �. l��" r "4- y�J�•..�a' °'!' `'j A' ��.`r's "" '�.�,'�t`r; � �.�' `�� e {�: `�r,�� ,��,� iy���� •''�. ,f } !err,, w. r °i- ", .�+'qY tyr� �• r . '1%`• � - i`. � r t �yi�,` , /s' � 5%' G e f ♦ r +y \ '+o" '..'{ .i . es} i - it .( i.�� . ',},,` 'J YN� - ` +F K k i 4 `^' ► �y_ � fv a Its y3 ` 1 - 4- j LI1� I �. ".77a �w • Fz.3.. ' .�'.. _ �a /! %.¢S T. K ■ a 44" AL IN %vim YY '70 ot ip i "' • ■ ,a a� k R � 4 f'x f pro* 4rfjF o ' f - ,s a'l ;fir \��r a �� •-� { .. � . s '1 � � �� a r f � t c _ f •'„ t ,t'�. i.t. Rat •Vr ^,w � •t - e. t at w IL_ t s � K i 1 I f _11 R e r r i ' tr` — .. At •. 41 I } 6 � `1 _ ;,tea •:.;� ��y�.. �' ��` - °�i � a. °�r i` t , � +'�. ' ,./'`� s' ► � ll� _ .� . ■ to �� � }'�li %��i ;�i 4�' -. ae • 6" T e r r If .� dor '� r.,,,• i'a t ♦t�� � • firr a ,j1 �y� � ,ti, .. ti 1��, ♦� LOA + ,r 4 E� ; • Kd�r '7� '� ., i � r 1iX f ; 4 r r'"a ! '• �'a. �;, w '' �v r '.. � . t� �, � 1 `a Ar C m y + r , { a T� a 4L i .« 5 � • � � � _ 4t 4k r• • :r :. � �. ''tie+ :.f # 4{, R _ r 4� . • i t +� �1 a 4i{ • 4 • -�/ 1�. ,*, ' !�• - • � ,1 • {mss •R .4 • _ i:'1y• -4 f. .,` f.1 a • Ot� A `. 1 116 -�' ~ '• • /, ♦�` �••.#Ar '� •,� . > 4i � : {+. ! r 411 -. r . 2 J= 8/2/10 iathan Vlaming senior Manager of Planning Three Rivers Park District Administrative Center 3000 Xenium Lane N Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Vlaming, We have been encouraged by members of the Edina City Council to suggest alternative routes to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, where the alternatives would moderate objections of Edina residents, lessen environmental impact, or lower costs. In the spirit of these objectives I would like to offer the following suggestion on the routing of sections 2 and 3. In section 2 1 see the major problems as the loss of Walnut Ridge Park as a neighborhood park with attendant multiple user safety problems and the cost, unsightliness, and potential damage to wetlands and flood storage, of the 2000 plus feet of raised wooden boardwalk. In section 3 1 see the major problems as proximity to traffic and the number of residential crossings. I would propose the following route. Beginning at the east side of the United Health Care parking lot, the nth would go south to the southern extremity of the wetland, from there it would go east along the southern edge of the wetlands to just east of the Fountain Woods Apartments. From there it would go south along the green belt between Fountain Woods and Walnut Drive to the intersection with Vernon Ave. It would follow Vernon to the intersection with Gleason. This route would completely eliminate Walnut Ridge Park as a problem. Because the route would follow the edge of the wetland it should be possible to eliminate some, if not all of the raised boardwalk. The route would be screened from the apartments and residents of Walnut drive by trees and other vegetation. Vernon Ave. has an extra lane and a sidewalk, from the intersection with the trail to Gleason ave. which would greatly lessen the proximity to traffic. The street route along Vernon would be less that one third the distance of the proposed route 3. Of this distance Chapel Hill Church property would be over 500'. The location of the trail close to the apartments would offer apartment residents immediate access to the trail for walking and exercise eliminating a walk to an access point of over 1/4 mile. I am attaching a photo showing the approximate route. Your comments would be appreciated Sincerely, Wm Westerdahl 5912 Walnut Dr Edina, MN 55436 3st,yv42 @amaii.ccm cc: Edina City Council i LL 71 8/2/10 Mary Brindle, Council Member Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mary, I want to thank you very much for taking the time to meet with us on Saturday. It was very informative and provided a useful exchange of views and ideas as well as being a pleasant walk and discussion. I have taken one of your suggestions to heart and have written Three Rivers Park District with an alternative plan that would eliminate the problems with Walnut Ridge Park. You should be receiving a copy of this letter and map with your council packet. Again, many thanks for taking the time to meet with us. Sincerely, Wm (Bill) Westerdahl RECEIVED ,jlj[ 2 2Q10 Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works & Transit 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320 612- 348 -9260, Phone Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 -1362 612 - 348 -9710, Fax F1 612- 596 -6985, TDD/TYY www.hennepin.mn.us July 22, 2010 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: To formalize and expand early collaborations across jurisdictions within the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridor, Hennepin County has established the Southwest LRT Community Works project. Please refer to the attached establishing resolution and project description for detailed information. A Steering Committee is being assembled to direct the Southwest LRT Community Works project, as well as liaison with the Southwest LRT Corridor Management Committee to ensure policy coordination and project oversight. Upon convening, the Steering Committee will establish partnership requirements, administrative needs, leadership, work plans, and meeting procedures. We invite you to appoint one elected official and an alternate to this committee. The first meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 8, 2010 at 8:00 am in the Council Chambers at the St. Louis Park City Hall. In addition to the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee, a staff working group will be established to implement the work plan. The working group will include representatives from Steering Committee partners and will report to the Steering Committee. We look forward to working with you on the Southwest LRT Community Works project. Please contact Patrick Connoy at (612) 348 -2215 or patrick.connoy@co.hennepin.mn.us to provide contact information for your representative to the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee. Thank you. Sincer , Philip C. Eckhert Director Hennepin County Housing, Community Works & Transit cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper iran sltlit croon moons go. J �J Southwest LRT Community Works Project Description and Work Plan Southwest LRT Community Works proposes to formalize and expand early collaborations across jurisdictions to maximize the economic and community benefits of transit investments within the Southwest LRT Corridor. Following this approach, the Southwest LRT Community Works project will create a shared vision and implementation strategy to provide housing choices, stimulate Transit Oriented Development (TOD), expand transportation options, address corridor -wide issues, leverage public and private investment and resources, and create sustainable communities. Background The proposed 15 -mile, 17- station Southwest LRT line will serve Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Edina, Hopkins, St. Louis Park and Minneapolis (Figure 1). Southwest LRT will be the region's first light rail line that extends from a central city through several suburban communities. The line will expand the region's transit system by connecting to the Hiawatha an'd Central LRT lines, the Northstar Commuter Rail line, the. proposed Bottineau Transitway and the region's bus network at the Transportation Interchange and Southwest Metro Transit in Eden Prairie. The line will improve. access to jobs, housing, community and medical facilities, entertainment, recreation area, and educational institutions. Southwest LRT Community Works will maximize the benefits that lie "beyond the rails. " Under Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) leadership, the Southwest LRT line recently achieved a major milestone with the selection of a preferred route, LRT 3A. The Alternatives Analysis (AA) process is complete and the project is ready to enter Preliminary Engineering (PE). By mid -2010, the project will be transferred to the Metropolitan Council which will prepare and submit an application to the FTA to begin preliminary engineering of the LRT line. The Metropolitan Council will establish a Southwest Corridor Management Committee and Southwest LRT Project Office in late 2010. On December 15, 2009, the Hennepin County Board established Southwest LRT Community Works Project to support community and economic development in concert with the development of light rail transit in the Southwest metro. Staff was directed to prepare a project description and work plan in consultation with the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park and Minneapolis, the Metropolitan Council and other identified stakeholders (attachment A). EDEN PRAIRIE MINNETONKA EDINA t HOPKINS ;`- ST. LOUIS PARK j7 MINNEAPOLIS 1 T° Ll �rUn.'311 I green moons go. Introduction Lessons learned from the Hiawatha and Central Corridor lines confirmed the vital role of a strategic, collaborative, integrated framework to address coordination, planning, and implementation for public investment to deliver light rail's broader benefits. The Southwest LRT project has goals to enhance economic .development and housing and promote integrated, sustainable design. Through partnerships, Southwest LRT Community Works will maximize the benefits that lie "beyond the rails." The program will build on successful corridor and regional partnerships and effective delivery systems to align policies, including federal initiatives to create sustainable communities, enhance economic competiveness through better access to housing and jobs, improve efficiency of public infrastructure investments, unlock private capital, and create healthy, safe, and walkable neighborhoods served by public transit. Southwest LRT Goals • Improve Mobility • Cost - effective /EfFide.nt • Preserve the Environment • Protect Quality of Life • Support Economic Development Southwest LRT Community Works Project Geographic Boundaries To effectively use public investments to leverage private investment in and around station locations, Southwest LRT Community Works investments will focus primarily on the % mile radius around stations, but will be flexible enough to respond to opportunities to provide linkages to housing, community amenities, natural resources, employment centers, commercial activity areas, or other destinations. Figure 1 identifies the proposed Southwest LRT Community Works geographic boundaries Southwest LRT Community Works Project Goals Goals for the Southwest LRT Community Works Project will reflect those contained in municipal comprehensive plans, Hennepin Community Works Program parameters, Southwest LRT project goals, and federal Sustainable Communities initiatives. Initial Southwest LRT Community Works Project goals include: • Maximize public /private investment along the corridor • Strategically align resources to promote economic development and redevelopment at station locations • Stimulate employment development to ensure accessibility to jobs for people of all income levels • Promote and implement a range of housing opportunities along the corridor • Improve multimodal connections to stations, within station areas and to key destinations along the corridor in keeping with the County's Complete Streets policy • Promote sustainability, including natural system preservation and enhancement, energy efficiency, and reduced carbon emissions throughout the corridor EDEN PRAIRIE P MINNETONKA EDINA HOPKINS L: ST. LOUIS PARK 1.. MINNEAPOLIS -- =' transi twc1 - green mans go. Southwest LRT Community Works provides an organization and a process for partners to: • work closely with the Southwest LRT Project to ensure timely coordination with project decision points, infrastructure investments, and delivery of the transit line • garner broad -based community and business input through a transparent public engagement process • establish and pursue a shared vision for the corridor that develops each station as a unique transit - centered place • inventory key redevelopment opportunities along the corridor and adjacent to stations • develop a framework for public investments that will leverage private investment and deliver community and economic benefits • align jurisdictional authorities, policies, technical and financial resources • advocate collectively for corridor -wide funding needs • acknowledge the importance and investments of property owners along the LRT corridor Southwest LRT Community Works Core Partners Core partners in Southwest LRT Community Works Project will include Hennepin County, the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA), the cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis, Edina, and the Metropolitan Council. As the Southwest LRT Community Works Project evolves over time additional partners may be added. Following the model of the Southwest LRT project under the HCRRA's direction, a robust public engagement process will involve stakeholders early and often throughout the process Initial Partners • Hennepin County & HCRRA • Eden Prairie • Min_netonka_ •. H,opkin`s • St. Louis Park • Minneapolis • Edina • Metropolitan Council Other government agencies, organizations, community groups, businesses, nonprofits, institutions and agencies will also play key roles in the implementation of the Southwest LRT Community Works project. Many of these organizations and agencies will collaborate with the Partnership Steering Committee on specific issues and /or projects and may, over time, become Partnership Steering Committee members. A significant and meaningful public engagement process will involve stakeholders early and often throughout the process and clearly define how their input will be gathered and used. EDEN PRAIRIE MINNETONKA EDINA =. HOPKINS F ST LOUIS PARK MINNEAPOLIS H l , 111 1 `tCClf151t G1. green means go. Southwest LRT Community Works Organizational Structure Governance and Policy The Southwest LRT Community Works Project is designed to evolve over time and with flexibility to respond to opportunities. The Southwest LRT Community Works Project will be established under the direction of a steering committee composed of the core project partners including: • Elected officials appointed by the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Minnetonka and St. Louis Park • Chair of the Metropolitan Council • Two Hennepin County Commissioners • One Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Board Member A staff working group composed of representatives from Steering Committee partners, and others, will be assembled to implement the Southwest LRT Community Works work plan. This staff group will report to the Steering Committee. The Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee is designed to be linked to the Southwest LRT Corridor Management Committee to ensure policy coordination and the strong integration of land use /economic development and engineering. Figure 2 documents this relationship. To facilitate communications between the LRT and Community Works project staff, it is recommended that the SW LRT Project Office include physical space for SW LRT Community Works in what can be described as a "design exchange" where engineering and land use plans and issues can be displayed and discussed among professional staff. It is also recommended that Hennepin County and Metropolitan Council seek funds to support two full -time professional staff (one civil engineer and one planner) to ensure that direct collaboration occurs between the preliminary engineering process and the land use /economic development process. In addition, this will ensure that preliminary engineering progress and results are shared with municipalities, business and community organizations and, similarly, that station area and municipal plans for land use and redevelopment are shared with SW LRT engineering staff. Administration Within the first six months, the Steering Committee will need to determine the kinds, amounts and sources of administrative support required. It is recommended that Hennepin County provide initial planning, legal, administrative and other implementation support for the Steering Committee. EDEN PRAIRIE MINNETONKA E� EDINA -" HOPKINS U ST LOUIS PARK Z MINNEAPOLIS (1) CJ E O a a Southwest LRT Project MnDOT (Met Council Corridor Advisory Committees (TBD) SW LRT Corridor Management Committee SW LRT Project Director Deputy Project Director Figure 2 SW LRT Community Works Project Partner Hennepin Business Community Cities County Organizations Organizations Assistant Project Director Envirorunental /Intergovernmental Affairs & Agreements Environmental I I Intergovernmental Affairs & Agreements x Appointed by the Chair or the Metropolitan Council pursuant to state statute. Land Use / Community Works SW LRT Community Works Project Steering Committee Administrative Coordinator Station Area & Other Advisory Committees (TBD) Consultants is I I Living Cities I I Project Staff TBD Project Team s t r� n tub ay,-- means m�ns go. Southwest LRT Community Works Work Plan (July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011) 1. Convene Partnership Steering Committee. • Establish a formal partnership agreement (similar to Midtown Community Works) to provide financial and administrative support, adopt governance procedures, and establish financial and resource support requirements for participating members. • Establish an organizational link and working relationship with the Southwest LRT Project Office • Foster mutual understanding among partners of LRT and .Community Works Project parameters, schedule, and decision points. 2. Identify immediate and long term Community Works financial needs and potential resources including public and private financial and professional support. • Research and create a comprehensive public investment framework that includes strategies to leverage public investment to attract, shape, and accelerate appropriate private investment. 3. Begin development of a comprehensive corridor investment framework. • Develop an existing conditions inventory and document using a series of maps including, but not limited to: local policies and regulatory mechanisms pertaining to. the Southwest LRT Corridor, including comprehensive plans, small area plans, neighborhood plans, zoning ordinances, station area plans, Transit Improvement Area plans, and transportation plans: location, size, and extent of infrastructure projects and investments; community amenities, parks, schools, housing, employment and shopping centers; and, demographic, economic, and regulatory conditions; land uses, amenities, housing types, employment • Develop a future conditions inventory and document using a series of maps including the items listed above. • Assess completed station area plans to identify. gaps, intermediate time frame implementation recommendations, TOD supportive improvements and TOD opportunity sites. • Conduct corridor and station area market studies. Examine and document site control issues and land acquisitions opportunities. • Map opportunity sites and major issues and prepare short-, interim -, and long -term strategies to preserve strategic land parcels and community assets and access to these sites. • Provide an established and coordinated voice to support funding request and legislative initiatives related 4. Research and develop a framework to align municipal and corridor -wide development authorities and planning land use controls, coordinate with financial resources and recommend authority changes as needed to support Southwest LRT Community Works objectives and strategies. EDEN PRAIRIE !' - MINNETONKA EDINA 6." HOPKINS L: ST. LOUIS PARK L MINNEAPOLIS .� i green means gO. trcnstu cV Southwest LRT Community Works Financial Resources One of the Steering Committee's first tasks is to garner and focus resources among the core partners to address administrative needs and initiate the work plan elements. Over the course of the project, it is envisioned that an investment portfolio will be assembled, primarily from resources available to participating organizations. This portfolio will provide assistance and incentives to attract other investments and secure funds for key implementation activities. Potential investment portfolio elements may include County resources (TOD and other'bonds, housing assistance, environmental funds, workforce funds, business development loans and state and federal assistance administered by the county, and others), Met Council funds (Livable Communities Act, Tax Base Revitalization and others), municipal resources (Tax Increment Financing, development fees and others), and the proposed TIF for TOD. The Steering Committee's corridor investment framework will guide Southwest LRT Community Works investment decisions and member participation. Immediate resources to support the organization of Southwest LRT Community Works project, begin critical planning, and promote broader education about TOD opportunities, include: Project Administration (2010 -2011) $80,000 (Staff and meeting support for Steering Committee and Work Groups -some in kind) Initial Strategic Planning & Investment Framework $300,000 (Living Cities funding request is pending. Work could be started using existing partner resources) Total $380,000 Because resources among the core Community Works partners are finite, the Southwest LRT Community Works Project will endeavor to create a framework to help partners strategically align existing resources to maximize leverage from other sources. Southwest LRT Community Works Evaluation Evaluation should occur throughout the project to inform stakeholders of progress and determine if investments yield desired results in keeping with the development framework. Monitoring progress and taking corrective action ensures that project objectives are being met. Partners will perform the following evaluation functions: 1. Identify outcomes for the project's goals. 2. Determine milestones and measures. Monitor accomplishment. 3. Identify funds leveraged and development catalyzed by public investment. 4. Identify accomplishment of county initiatives and integration between LRT line design and land use /TOD /economic development decisions. 5. Identify best practices for use in future corridor projects. Consistent with the goal of achieving multiple, sustainable community benefits, Southwest LRT Community Works will Identify potential resources and tools available for public infrastructure, public realm improvements and other investment strategies to attract private investment in ways that deliver maximum community benefits. EDEN PRAIRIE ?: MINNETONKA EDINA i HOPKINS %" ST LOUIS PARK MINNEAPOLIS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 09 -0596 [2009] wwmhehhepin.us The following Resolution was offered by Public Works, Energy & Environment Committee: WHEREAS, the proposed Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT) Line will serve the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and St. Louis Park, as a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) New Starts project and is included in the Metropolitan Council's long -range Transportation Policy Plan; and WHEREAS, enhancing economic development is one of five adopted goals of the Southwest LRT project, consistent with the FTA goals and measures of evaluation for funding New Starts projects; and WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Line presents numerous opportunities for transit - oriented economic development that maximizes public and private investments along the corridor, particularly in the areas surrounding transit stations; and WHEREAS, Hennepin Community Works is a program with demonstrated effectiveness in bringing communities together to create jobs, provide access to employment, and enhance the long term value of communities by investing in infrastructure, public works, parks and the natural environment; and WHEREAS, Hennepin Community Works is an appropriate program for integrating the Southwest LRT Line with targeted economic development activities, and is consistent with new federal programs through the Interagency Council on Sustainable Communities to promote the coordination of transportation, housing, community development, energy and environmental policies; therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners establishes the Southwest LRT Community Works project and directs staff to report back to the County Board within 90 days of adoption of this resolution with a Southwest LRT Community Works plan that includes project goals, the geographic boundary of the project, identification of participating organizations and the organizational structure, and a work plan and budget; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Board directs staff to develop the Southwest LRT Community Works project and plan in consultation with the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and St. Louis Park, the Metropolitan Council, and other Southwest LRT key stakeholders. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were 7 YEAS and 0 NAYS, as follows: County of Hennepin Board of County Commissioners YEAS NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT Mike Opat X Mark Stenglein X Gail Dorfman X Peter McLaughlin X Generated 12/16/2009 1 2:21:15 PM Randy Johnson Jan Callison Jeff Johnson RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON 12/15/2009 ATTEST: Clerk to the County Board Generated 12/16/2009 12:21:15 PM Hennepin County Board Action Request 10- 0303R1 vm,mbeainepin.us Item Description: Accept staff report of Southwest LRT Community Works Project Description & Workplan; direct project implementation; appoint commissioners to represent the County Board on project Steering Committee Resolution: WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Line has been advanced through planning, alternatives analysis, conceptual engineering, and environmental review processes under the leadership of Hennepin County and its Regional Railroad Authority and is now being transferred to Metropolitan Council sponsorship for purposes of engineering, construction and operation; and WHEREAS, development and operation of the Southwest LRT line presents unprecedented opportunities to enhance the public benefits of transit investments through strategic, coordinated public and private investments `beyond the rails" that will support economic development, creation of accessible jobs and housing, more efficient uses of land, and creation of healthy, safe and walkable neighborhoods served by public transit; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has established the Southwest LRT Community Works Program to guide and support community and economic development in concert with light rail transit development in the Southwest corridor and staff has prepared, as directed, a Project description and work program for the Southwest LRT Community Works Project, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Board accepts the staff report, Southwest LRT Community Works Project Description and Workplan, approves its recommendations for implementation of the Southwest LRT Community Works Project and directs the County Administrator to take necessary steps to begin project implementation and to report back on implementation progress and results as of December 31, 2010, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board establishes the Southwest Corridor LRT Steering Committee to consist of two Hennepin County Board members, a board member of the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, one elected official appointed from each of the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and St: Louis Park, and a representative of the Metropolitan Council, and that the Steering Committee be authorized to add and include additional stakeholder representation as appropriate throughout the course of the project, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board appoints Commissioners Gail Dorfman and Jan Callison to represent the Hennepin County Board on the project Steering Committee. Page 1 of 3 Hennepin County Board Action Request (continued) Requesting Department Housing Community Works Transit Recommendation from County Administrator Recommend Approval Committee Assignment Public Works, Energy & Environment Committee Background The Southwest LRT line is a 15 mile corridor from Eden Prairie to downtown Minneapolis, passing through the cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park and Minneapolis. Following more than a decade of preliminary planning, feasibility studies, land acquisition and alternatives analysis under the sponsorship of Hennepin County, the project is being transitioned from Hennepin County to the Metropolitan Council as it is being prepared to enter the preliminary engineering (PE) phase of development. Recent experiences with design and construction of the Hiawatha and Central light rail transit (LRT) Ilines have underscored the importance of coordinating land use planning along the LRT line with design and engineering of the line itself. Such coordination can maximize economic development along the corridor and public benefits emanating from both LRT and development investments. The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners established the Southwest LRT Community Works Project in December, 2009, to provide an organizational structure and process for coordinating LRT engineering and land use planning (Resolution 09- 0596). The resolution also directed County staff to prepare, in consultation with municipalities, the Metropolitan Council and other stakeholders, "a Southwest LRT Community Works plan that includes project goals, the geographic boundary of the project, identification of participating organizations and organizational structure, and a work plan and budget." A staff report, Southwest LRT Community Works Project Description and Work Plan (attached), has been prepared in response to Resolution 09 -0596. The report addresses the elements specified in Resolution 09 -0596 and includes an organizational chart linking the Southwest LRT Community Works Project to the SW LRT Project Office. The report also proposes establishment of a Steering Committee for the Southwest LRT Community Works Project comprised of elected representatives of the County, Regional Rail Authority, Municipalities along the corridor and a representative of the Metropolitan Council. Upon appointment and organization, the Steering Committee would guide start-up activities and inclusion of additional stakeholders in the project. The proposed resolution accepts the staff report, approves its recommendations for implementation of the Southwest LRT Community Works Project and directs the County Administrator to take necessary steps to begin project implementation and to report back on implementation progress and results as of December 31, 2010. The resolution also provides for the Board's appointment of two commissioners_ to represent the County on the Steering Committee and requests that they invite participation of the other organizations and convene an organizational meeting of the Steering Committee. Page 2of3 Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 10- 0303131 [2010] wrwmhenneppin.us The following Resolution was offered by Commissioner Callison and seconded by Commissioner Stenglein: WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Line has been advanced through planning, alternatives analysis, conceptual engineering, and environmental review processes under the leadership of Hennepin County and its Regional Railroad Authority and is now being transferred to Metropolitan Council sponsorship for purposes of engineering, construction and operation; and WHEREAS, development and operation of the Southwest LRT line presents unprecedented opportunities to enhance the public benefits of transit investments through strategic, coordinated public and private investments "beyond the rails" that will support economic development, creation of accessible jobs and housing, more efficient uses of land, and creation of healthy, safe and walkable neighborhoods served by public transit; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has established the Southwest LRT Community Works Program to guide and support community and economic development in concert with light rail transit development in the Southwest corridor and staff has prepared, as directed, a Project description and work program for the Southwest LRT Community Works Project, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Board accepts the staff report, Southwest LRT Community Works Project Description and Workplan, approves its recommendations for implementation of the Southwest LRT Community Works Project and directs the County Administrator to take necessary steps to begin project implementation and to report back on implementation progress and results as of December 31, 2010, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board establishes the Southwest Corridor. LRT Steering Committee to consist of two Hennepin County Board members, a board member of the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, one elected official appointed from each of the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and St. Louis Park, and a representative of the Metropolitan Council, and that the Steering Committee be authorized to add and include additional stakeholder representation as appropriate throughout the course of the project, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board appoints Commissioners Gail Dorfman and Jan Callison to represent the Hennepin County Board on the project Steering Committee. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were 6 YEAS and 0 NAYS, as follows: County of Hennepin Board of County Commissioners YEAS NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT Mike Opat X Mark Stenglein X Gail Dorfman X Peter McLaughlin X Randy Johnson X Generated 7/23/2010 11:16:23 AM Jan Callison X Jeff Johnson X RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON 7/22/2010 ATTEST: Clerk to the County Board 2 Generated 7/23/2010 11:16:23 AM Agenda Item III.E. Request Authorization to apply for Local Government Renewable Energy Grant CITY OF EDINA SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC PROJECT • Located on Roof of City Hall Building • 20 kw system will generate approximately 12% of building's electricity • Approximately 95 solar panels will lie flat on roof • Display inside City Hall educates public on energy • Grant Funding Available from federal stimulus funding • Deadline to Apply: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 • Total Cost of Project: $205,000 • Federal stimulus grant - $82,000 • Xcel Solar Rewards rebate - $44,000 ■ In -kind donation of materials and supplies by Enhanced Home Systems - $60,000 ■ Funding needed from City - $18,700 • Electricity savings at 6cents /kwh - approx. $1,800 /yr • Return on Investment • City receives $205,000 project for $18,700 • Energy savings pays for city investment in less than 10 years, at current electricity rates Recommended by Edina Energy and Environment Commission • GreenStep Cities Best Practice — Renewable Energy • Reducing City Greenhouse Gas Emissions — ICLEI & Mayors Climate Protection Agreement • City Leads by Example -- Solar (City Hall), Geothermal (Public Works), Home Energy Squad /Edina Go Green (Community wide) • Provides real -time data and educational opportunity for linking with community education and Edina school district 4 EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2010 7:00 PM - MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Members Absent Staff Arnie Bigbee Shara Mohtadi Susan Howl John Cashmore Emma Weisberg Lisa Finsness Jessi Kingston Bob Mayer Dee Moore Meg Newell Russ Stanton, Minutes Approved Member Cashmore seconded the motion of Member Stanton to approve the minutes of April 27, 2010; the motion carried. Work Plan Committee Reports Given • Administration: Member Mayer has assumed the task of reviewing the scope of.the Commission. • Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan: Members Bigbee and Moore presented a handout with a timeline moving to the approval of a revised plan by the City Council in September and presenting the plan to the community thereafter. Members Bigbee and Moore will meet with the Police Chief, Jeff Long, with the following questions: How are officers trainedi How are bias /hate crimes determined? What services does the Police Department use? When is the media used? The importance of connecting with the School District and the State was emphasized. • Demographics: "Member, Stanton reported that the census will provide the means to partner with other organizations, using demographics to identify needs. The census data will not be ready until the end of the year and will definitely be a key element for future strategic planning: • Visibility: Members Finsness and Newell asked the question: "Do people in the'community `see /know about' HRRC ?" Spring was a productive time —the STAND dinner at the High School cultural fair, Volunteer Recognition, and the Tom Oye Human Rights Awards. It was recommended that the City put together an article for the Sun Current highlighting the purpose of the Award and its recipients. The City's 4`h of July Parade would be an excellent way to highlight the Commission and pass out information. It was suggested that the Visibility Team have a meeting with Patrick Duffy and Rachael Pream- Grenier of the School District to consider ideas such as forming a volunteer group for tutoring. Domestic Partnership Ordinance - Discussed • Revisions have been received in preparation of Second Reading on June 1s'. • The, City's Personnel Policy needs to cover the death of a partner and the pension. • " Chair Bigbee will draft a letter to Phil Duran, thanking him for his excellent work in guiding the Commission toward the successful outcome. STAND Event Cancelled Due to bad weather, the STAND event at Lake Harriet was cancelled. It is hoped that it can be rescheduled sometime this summer. Funding Process Reviewed Member Cashmore seconded the motion of Chair Bigbee to approve the following.process for 2011 human services funding: • The hearing for the providers will be on Tuesday, June 22nd • Member Finsness will prepare a template to help Commissioners organize their thoughts. • Twenty minutes will be allowed for each provider to share information about the current year and for Commissioners to ask questions. • A complete packet of all the RFPs will be picked up by each Commissioner at City Hall the week of June 71h The motion carried. Operations of the Edina Community Council Shared Member Finsness distributed information providing the Community Council's mission statement and responsibilities. As a part of the planning for the upcoming year (September -May), the Council has invited HRRC to make a presentation at a meeting in the fall. Member Finsness also distributed census information for Edina. Workshop Information Updated Member Kingston has applied to host a workshop on the Domestic Partnership Ordinance at the December conference of the LMHRC in St. Paul. Chair Bigbee indicated that he might also apply to host another workshop around the topic of "structuring a commission." Roseville Forum to be Updated Due to time constraints, Member Moore will report on the events that took place at the recent Roseville Forum at the next Commission meeting. Meeting Adiourned There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM. Respectfully submitted, Arnie Bigbee, Chair Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission AB /sh EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION HEARING TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 2010 4:00 PM – MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Members Absent Staff Arnie Bigbee Jessi Kingston Susan Howl John Cashmore Russ Stanton Lisa Finsness Bob Mayer Dee Moore Meg Newell Conflict Resolution Center– Karmit Buhlman, Executive Director 0 2011 request: $5,000 • 2010 funding is $2,322. The Center is the only community mediation program serving Edina residents. It provides mediation and conflict resolution services to families, individuals, neighbors, businesses and agencies. The Center utilizes trained volunteer mediators. Edina Resource Center– Val Burke, Director • 2011 request: $38,316 • 2010 funding is $37,200. Having been established as a continuing partnership between the City and School District, the Center is a responsive, community -based operation that assists people through collaborative programs and connections to resources. Edina Family Center School Readiness – Mary Streier, Coordinator • 2011 request: $12,000 • 2010 funding is $1,458. The purpose of the program is to identify preschool children who are at risk for learning and to help them enter school with the skills and behaviors necessary to be successful. Also provided are transportation, ESL, parent education and home visits. Tubman – Jennifer Polzin, Chief of Resource Development and Communications 0 2011 request: $5,000 0 2010 funding is $1,908 As a result of a merger of three separate organizations, Tubman is now the State's largest provider of domestic violence services. In addition, it offers family violence shelter, transitional housing, legal assistance, mental and chemical health counseling and violence prevention. Cornerstone – Susan Neis, Executive Director • 2011 request: $15,000 • 2010 funding is $15,098 Other than providing emergency safe - housing for victims of domestic abuse and their children, Cornerstone offers advocacy and support to navigate the court system, to develop goals and a safety plan and to partake of individual counseling. Cornerstone runs the Day One Program —a secure and confidential web -based database connecting Minnesota domestic violence shelters and safe housing programs to each other's bed -space availability and program information. 0 The Bridge for Youth – Kate Eubank, Development & Communications Director • 2011 request: $5,500 • 2010 funding is $4,824. The Bridge helps youth in crisis. It offers a continuum of care — providing immediate safety for youth, helping parents and youth resolve their conflicts, reconnecting youth people with family, fostering stable living conditions for youth at risk, and providing supportive housing for homeless youth who must prepare to live independently. VEAP – Karin Meier, Development Director • 2011 request: $22,000 • 2010 funding is $21,204. VEAP's operations address the multiple needs of low- income families by helping them overcome short-term financial crises and maintaining self- sufficiency. Its programs are relevant to human services needs and include: food services; school supplies; holiday gifts; emergency financial assistance for housing, utilities, car repairs and day care; and transportation services for the limited - income seniors and residents with disabilities. Senior Community Services – Adele Mehta, Director of Senior Outreach • 2011 request: $29,500 0 2010 funding is $24,120. The Senior Outreach Program serves older adults and their caregivers by: conducting a comprehensive assessment of strengths and needs; developing a service plan; arranging for services; providing ongoing monitoring and assistance; facilitating support groups; serving as a liaison for the senior regarding Medicare and other health insurance; and providing caregiver coaching. Normandale Center– Deborah Paone, Executive Director • 2011 request: $8,910 • 2010 funding is $3,366. Utilizing a care team volunteer program, the Center walks with older adults in transition and their family caregivers to support health in spirit, mind and body. The volunteers reach out to seniors who are functionally unable to perform certain instrumental activities of daily living such as driving and grocery shopping and to those who are isolated with no connections to supports. Store To Door – Mary Jo Schifsky, Executive Director • 2011 request: $11,600 • 2010 funding is $6,732. Utilizing a large number of volunteers, the agency enhances opportunities for aging adults to live independently by shopping for and delivering their groceries and prescriptions right into their kitchens. Clients pay for the groceries and contribute toward the cost of the deliveries. The volunteers provide a valuable service by putting helpful structures in place to ensure that the aging residents have adequate /safe housing, social and nutritional support. Arthritis Foundation —North Central Chapter – Deborah Sales Maysack, President and CEO • 2011 request: $5,000 • New program: No funding in 2010. As a volunteer- driven organization, the Chapter is continually identifying, recruiting and training new volunteers to implement their scientifically - proven and evidence -based programs. With the goal of helping Edinans who live with arthritis learn to manage their disease through exercise programs, the Chapter plans to conduct volunteer leader trainings for the Aquatic Program, Exercise Program, Self - Help Program and the Tai Chi Program. As a result, up to 40 new volunteer- trained leaders would be able to implement classes in Edina. Commission Business Commissioners with unanswered questions regarding the proposals for 2011 funding were asked to submit them to Susan Howl by Monday, June 28`h, to be forwarded to the providers. Answers from the providers would be returned to Ms. Howl by Friday, July 2 "d, to be distributed to the Commissioners. Adjournment There being no further business, the hearing/meeting was adjourned at 9:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Arnie Bigbee, Chair Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission Metropolitan Council ALHOA Calculation for 2011 ALHOA -- required expenditure/ contribution for taxes able in 2010 Edina 304,550 Statewide Health Improvement Program M'N�'' "� ISI ®N July 15, 2010 In This Issue SHIP Success Story Farmers Market Debut Community Initiatives • More Farmers Market Celebrations • Bike to the Market • Hooray for Road Construction! School Initiatives • Seeds grow more than vegetables • Congratulations to Bloomington SHIP Pilot School — Oak Grove Middle • Welcome to Jessica Smith. SHIP Liaison at Richfield Public Schools For Your Information • National Trends in Biking and Walking • "F as in Fat. How Obesity threatens America's Future 20',') Help us make our community better for our health! Share this eNewsletter with a friend Join the SHIP eNewsletter mailing list SHIP Success Story Farmers Market Debut July 1 was a celebrated day for staff from the City of Edina and SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Program) in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. It was the City's first farmers market. The day was beautiful and there was a great turnout. SHIP was a primary contributor to the opening of the Edina Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. Increasing access to fresh fruits and vegetables is a SHIP initiative. City of Edina leaders chose to do this by offering an Edina -based farmers market. r .7. SHIP In order to make this possible, however, City Code had to be amended to allow the sale of produce in a City park. SHIP staff facilitated this process by providing expertise regarding why a Farmers Market would benefit the health of Edina residents. According to local data, Bloomington, Edina and Richfield residents are not consuming the recommended 9 or more servings of fruits and vegetables every day. Eating a balanced diet is one of the most important things a person can do to maintain and improve overall health. Poor nutrition can contribute to obesity and other chronic diseases - one out of two adults in Southern Hennepin County was overweight or obese in 2006 (SHAPE). Experts suggest purchasing foods directly through farms, including farmers markets, has the potential to increase consumption of healthier foods. City of Edina and SHIP staffs were ultimately successful in their efforts to establish an Edina farmers market. SHIP staff researched farmers market - related city codes and provided examples to Edina staff. They also shared farmers market start -up and management tools and assisted with drafting a marketing and promotion plan and an evaluation plan. On February 6, 2010, the Edina City Council voted to amend City code allowing the sale of produce in City parks and resulting in their first Farmers Market. The market will continue to run on Thursdays from 3 -7 p.m. through September 30. Read the Star Tribune article. 3z:k Community Initiatives More Farmers Market Celebrations It's good for your health and fun for the kids! July 9 was another celebration for the opening of the NEW satellite farmers market in Richfield. Thanks to Richfield leaders who worked to open the satellite farmers market, more locally grown fresh fruits and vegetables are available to residents .. and the kids had fun in the bounce house. The new satellite market is located at Roosevelt Park (77th St. & Portland Ave.) and is open from 2 - 6 p.m. There is also the Richfield Farmers Market at Veterans Memorial Park (64th St. & Portland Ave.) on Saturdays from 7 a.m. - 12 p.m. The Bloomington Farmers Market is up and running every Saturday at the Civic Plaza from 8 a.m. -1 p.m. Links to all the Farmers Markets can be found on our SHIP weesite under the `Community" section on each of the cities' pages. EBC." Bike to the Market Those biking to the Bloomington Farmers Market on June 26 received a $2 farmers market gift certificate. SHIP provided the $2 gift certificates to the first 100 community members who biked to the Market for "Get Fit Day ". Over 60 community members, including families and older adults, took advantage of this physical activity opportunity and parked in the bike valet. This number didn't include the handful of bikers who parked across the street and may not have gotten the certificate. Most of the gift certificates were redeemed at produce vendors! Because the Bloomington Market is not located in a park with other recreational opportunities, SHIP staff created a walking map showing distances of various pathways to encourage physical activity for market goers. The map also included a recipe featuring seasonal produce available at the market, physical activity guidelines for adults, bike rack locations, and nutrition websites to get more information about healthy eating. "Bike to the Market" was a promotion for the Bloomington Farmers Market "Get Fit Day." but it may be repeated to encourage and build the habit of using non - motorized transportation and to increase physical activity opportunities. It may also be offered at the Richfield and Edina markets as well. Eacr Hooray for Road Construction! West 86th St. in Bloomington (Penn Avenue to 1 -35M closed at 5 a.m. Thursday, July 8 for road reconstruction, so why are we happy? Soon there will be bike lanes! SHIP staff has been involved in making recommendations for this project and it's exciting to see it happen. With this reconstruction, striping will convert the current 4 -lane configuration to a 3 -lane configuration (1- lane in each direction, a continuous center left -turn lane) to create a bike lane on each side. Each. School Initiatives Seeds grow more than vegetables The gardens at SECA (South Education Center Alternative) in Richfield may look like they are growing vegetables, but it's really more than that. It's an opportunity for growth in every sense of the word. SECA provides educational opportunities for high school students who need to recover high school credits or work on the development of basic skills. It is also for pregnant and parenting teens. Bloomington Public Health awarded SECA a SHIP mini -grant to fund the garden project. To say the garden will provide a source of fresh fruits and vegetables for students would be an understatement. Guided by their teachers, students were involved from the start. They planted the seeds that sprouted and grew near the school windows. When seedlings were ready for transplanting, they were placed in raised beds constructed by a retired teacher. Students, including parenting teens and their children, carefully pulled weeds so the seedlings would have room to grow. Now, the radishes are ready! Teen moms and their young children pulled them from the soil and carried them inside where their children could wash and then taste them — and the moms could taste them too! When more vegetables are ready for harvest, the teen moms will be finding ways to prepare and introduce them to their children. They will make story books about the garden and use pictures taken of the children with their moms. From the garden, students are learning and experiencing the benefits of their work. Young mothers and their children are "growing" together. For their children, learning to like fruits and vegetables at a young age will lead to better lifelong health. nBCK Congratulations to Bloomington SHIP Pilot School — Oak Grove Middle Congratulations to Oak Grove Middle School for receiving the "Wellness by Design" gold school award. Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Departments selected the school for the award in June, 2010. The Wellness by Design School Award recognizes schools that go above and beyond to create healthy environments for their students and staff. Schools are judged for their innovative efforts in coordinated school health areas. SHIP provided the student focus for the area of "healthy school environment." The following are other coordinated school health areas judged for the award: health education, family /community involvement, physical education, health promotion for staff, health services, nutrition services and counseling, psychological and social services. Welcome to Jessica Smith, SHIP Liaison at Richfield Public Schools We're very happy to have Jessica Smith join our team. Jessica started last week at Richfield Public Schools and is eagerly familiarizing herself with our SHIP plan and getting acquainted with everyone at RPS and other SHIP staff. Jessica is in the last stages of completing her Master's in Public Health at the University of Minnesota. She brings with her strong experience in managing large projects at the Ramsey County Breastfeeding Coalition, the YMCA of Greater St. Paul, and the James J. Hill Reference Library. Welcome Jessica! a CF. For Your Information National Trends in Biking and Walking The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (PBIC) released a 15 -year status report detailing trends and changes in bicycling and walking since 1994. The report, titled "The National Bicycling and Walking Study," had two goals established by the US Department of Transportation when first published. The first goal was to double the percentage of bicycling and walking trips in the United States from 7.9 percent to 15.8 percent. The second goal was to simultaneously reduce the number of bicyclists and pedestrians killed or injured in traffic crashes by 10 percent. The latest report shows even though the percentage of total bicycling and walking trips has not doubled, an increase has occurred. Further, the safety goal outlined in the 1994 study has been exceeded. The report also examines a range of efforts at the Federal, State and local levels to increase bicycling and walking in the United States. The report can be downloaded here. cac, "F as in Fat: How Obesity threatens America's Future 2010" This report, by Trust for America's Health and RWJF, gives weight to the importance of SHIP interventions targeting obesity. According to this report, adult obesity rates climbed in 28 states during the past year. Obesity rates now exceed 25 percent in more than two- thirds of the states. concludes that the nation's response still fails to measure up to the magnitude of the problem. At the same time, it highlights public recognition of the issue and results of a new survey showing Americans' acute concern about childhood obesity —and their willingness to invest significantly in prevention programs. One of its recommendations is to increase the number of programs available in communities, schools, and childcare settings that help make nutritious foods more affordable and accessible. It also recommends providing safe and healthy places for people to engage in physical activity. Further information and state specific information here. Sock Susan Howl r; i '7rom: Jennifer Bennerotte ;ent: Monday, August 02, 2010 12:23 PM To: ED Everyone Subject: July 2010 website report Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of July 2010: Total visits: 100,441 Number of visitors: 56,258 Total number of hits: 3,422,569, an increase of about 13 percent over July 2009 Average time of each visit: 9 minutes, 13 seconds Total page views:.267,696 Average page;views per day: 8,635 Busiest day of the month: July 7 with 160,895 hits The most visited page was the Edina Aquatic Center page, with 7,521 visits! Other top pages included the following (with number of visits): Edina Aquatic Center General Information -- 5,711 Edina Aquatic Center Rates -- 3,899 Job Listings -- 3,340 Edina Aquatic Center Hours -- 3,338 .Centennial Lakes Park -= 3,054 Edina Aquatic Center Attractions -- 2,645 Park & Recreation Department -- 2,217 Administration & Jobs -- 2,205 Centennial Lakes Park Cultural Events -- 2,186 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the Centennial Lakes Park summer entertainment schedule, which was downloaded 3,500 times. Other frequently down loaded.files included the following (with number of downloads): Park & Recreation Insider -- 1,507 Bike Plan -- 1,154 Community street map — 855 City Council meeting agenda — 616 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report — 496 Map of.park and recreational amenities — 488 Brochure for new and prospective employees —450 Braemar Arena Open Skating Schedule — 406 July 4; 2010 Crime Activity Report — 345 Though the website has grown substantially in the past year, interest still needs to be generated among the public. To gain that interest and generate more hits, please attempt to include the Uniform Resource Locator (URL), www.CityofEdina.com, on all correspondence. We have been streaming video on our website for more than two years. The most requested videos in July were the July 20 City Council meeting (252 views), June 30 Planning Commission meeting (191), July 6 City Council meeting (169), July episode of "Agenda:, Edina" (69), July episode of "In Edina" (41), shoreline buffer PSA (24), June -July episode of "Beyond the -Badge (23), "Moses Miracle" episode of "In Edina" (23), July 13 Park Board meeting (14), and June 15 City Council meeting (13). All programming except meetings is also streamed on You Tube. 1 Late last month, the City launched its first Facebook page for Edina Liquor. If you use Facebook, be sure to "Like" Edina Liquor to receive notices of specials and newly released product. A Facebook page for Edinborough Park will next be developed. Please continue to tell others about our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, please contact me. Thanks! Have a great day! Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte(a�ci.edina.mn.us