HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-09-21_COUNCIL MEETING�5
*
*
AGENDA.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 21, 20.10
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners
as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with
an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items,unless a Commissioner
or Council Member so requests it.' In such cases the item wilV. be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING°& REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
I. APPROVAL�OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of September 7, 2010
II. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -2 - Appointing Cell Smith, Interim Executive Director of Edina
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 7, 2010 and Work Sessions of
September 7, 2010 and September 13, 2010
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members
make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as
long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and
to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following
guidelines:
Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as
deemed necessary.
Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to
the matter under consideration.
In order to maintain a'respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs,
clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is
not allowed.
A. PUBLIC HEARING — Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Amending Section 900 Edina Liquor Code
* B. PUBLIC HEARING — New Intoxicating Liquor License — Pinstripes — Continued to
October 5, 2010
Agenda /Edina City. Council
September 21, 2010
Page 2
III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS
* A. Installation of Hockey, Rink Lights and Poles —Pamela Park & Walnut Ridge Park
* B. 70th Street Improvements, Contract, No. ENG 10 -3; Improvement Nos..BA -367, SS-
457, STS -369, WM -503, TS 43 & 44, and L57
IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote''of majority of Council Members present to
approve except where noted)
A. Call For Sale of Bonds — Resolution No. 2010 -78 Providing For sale of $9,225,000 G.O.
Capital Improvements Plan Bonds, Series.2010A and Resolution No. 2010 -79 Providing
For Sale of $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010B
B Resolution No. 2010 -77 Accepting Various..Donations (Affirmative vote of four Council
Members to approve)
* C. Resolution No. 2010 -80 Designating City Manager on Interim Basis
D. Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2010
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or
concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't
slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes.
The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and
topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be
addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or
Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter
to staff for consideration, at a future meeting.
VI. FINANCE
* A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, ,Pre -List dated September 9, 2010,
TOTAL $1,279,012.58; Pre -List dated September .16, 2010, TOTAL $419,491.72 and for
Credit Card Transactions dated 7/27/10 — 8/25/10 TOTAL $8,781.44
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
Agenda /Edina City Council
September 21, 2010
Page 3
A. Correspondence
VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS
A. Interim City Manager
IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need
assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else,
please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS
Tues
Sep 21
Work Session — Utility Budget & CIP Review
5:00 P.M.
Tues
Sep 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
Sep 28
Study Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review
4:30 — 6:30 P.M.
Wed
Sep 29
Joint Work Session with Three Rivers Park Board
7:00 —10:00 P.M.
Tues
Oct 5
Work Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review Cont.
5:00 — 6:30 P.M.
Tues
Oct 5
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
Oct 19
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
Oct 26
Study Session —to be determined
11:30 A.M.
Mon
Nov 1
Work Session — Final Levy Review & 20100 Gen Fund Budget
5:00 P.M.
Mon
Nov 1
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
Nov 2
ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M.
Mon
Nov 8
CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS
5:00 P.M.
Thur
Nov 11
VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Tues
Nov 16
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
Nov 23
Study Session —to be determined
7:30 A.M.
Thur
Nov 25
THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Fri
Nov 26
DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Tues
Dec 7
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Tues
Dec 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
Fri
Dec 24
CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Fri
Dec 31
NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
COMMUNITY ROOM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COMMUNITY ROOM
SOUTH VIEW MID SCHOOL
COMMUNITY ROOM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COMMUNITY ROOM
COMMUNITY ROOM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COMMUNITY ROOM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
r
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 7, 2010
7:07 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Swenson approving the Council consent agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
EDINA POLICE RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation recognizing the Edina
Police Department. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving
a proclamation recognizing the Edina police department for writing 900 traffic tickets in
July 2010.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Police Chief Long thanked the Council for this recognition and stated that the point was not the
number of tickets issued but keeping residents safe. Bob O'Brien, liaison to Law Enforcement
Department of Public Safety, commented on the importance of law enforcement and resulting
increase in safety and stated his appreciation to the Police Department for its dedicated efforts.
The Council concurred and thanked the officers in attendance.
CONSTITUTION WEEK DECLARED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring
Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by
Member Brindle, approving a proclamation declaring September 17 to 23, 2010, as
Constitution Week in the City of Edina.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Dianna Lynch, 5936 Grove Street, thanked the Council for this recognition and its support of
democracy.
*MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 2010, AND WORK
SESSIONS OF AUGUST 17, 2010, AUGUST 30, 2010, AND AUGUST 31, 2010 Motion made
by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the
regular meeting of August 17, 2010, and work sessions of August 17, 2010, August 30,
2010, and August 31, 2010.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON PRELIMINARY 2011 TAX LEVY AND OPERATING BUDGET —
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -72 ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
Finance Director Wallin presented the draft resolution that established a 2011 preliminary levy of
$26,088,328. He advised the levy would be certified to the County and the County would send
property specific tax notices to property owners. A public hearing was scheduled for December 7,
2010.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
Page 1
Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7. 2010
Public Testimony
Bob Kojetin, 5016 William Avenue, representing the Edina Historical Society, addressed the
Council and requested additional support.
Dan Kelley, 88 Woodland Circle, representing the Edina Historical Society, addressed the Council
and advised of their budgetary needs.
Arnie Bigbee, 7621 Edinborough Way, Human Rights & Relations Commission Chair, addressed
the Council and presented their request for the same level of funding in 2011.
Bill McCabe, 6124 Hanson Road, representing the Edina Public Art Committee, addressed the
Council and reviewed their activities.
The Council discussed the services rendered by the Edina Historical Society and Human Rights &
Relations Commission for the City's residents. The Council requested the Edina Public Art
Committee submit a formal budgetary request and supporting analysis.
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public
hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -72, adopting the
proposed budget for the City of Edina for year 2011, and establishing the proposed tax levy
payable in 2011. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*AWARD OF BID — AERIAL BUCKET TRUCK — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion
made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for aerial
bucket truck, Edina Park Maintenance department to the recommended low bidder, I -State
Trucker Center at $63,019.17.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — TWO ONE -TON TRUCKS FOR PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member
Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for two one -ton trucks for
public works to the recommended low bidder, Midway Ford Commercial Fleet and
Government Sales at $70,162.76.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — TRUCK BODY FOR ONE -TON TRUCK FOR STREET DEPARTMENT IN
PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson
awarding the bid for truck body for one -ton truck for street department in public works to
the recommended low bidder, Aspen Equipment at $32,289.08.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — TRUCK BODY FOR ONE -TON TRUCK FOR ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT
IN PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson
awarding the bid for truck body for one -ton truck for electrical department in public works
to the recommended low bidder, ABM Equipment & Supply at $28,005.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — AERIAL BUCKET ASSEMBLY FOR ONE -TON TRUCK FOR ELECTRICAL
DEPARTMENT IN PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Swenson awarding the bid for aerial bucket assembly for one -ton truck for
Page 2
Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7. 2010
electrical department in public works to the recommended low bidder, ABM Equipment &
Supply at $39,262.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — WEST 50TH STREET PLANTER LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION —
PROJECT NO. ENG 10 -14 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member
Swenson awarding the bid for West 50th Street Planter Landscape and Irrigation, Project
No. ENG 10 -14, to the recommended low bidder, Hoffman & McNamara Company at
$25,783.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*2011 BUDGET AND LEVY PUBLIC HEARING AND BUDGET AND LEVY ADOPTION
MEETING SET Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson, to set
Tuesday, December 7, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. for the budget and levy meeting public hearing
and Tuesday, December 21, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. for the budget and levy adoption meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
DRAFT LIQUOR CODE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEWED AND PUBLIC HEARING
DATE SET — SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 Interim Manager Worthington presented the draft liquor
ordinance amendment to allow more charitable organizations to apply for a temporary intoxicating
on -sale liquor license. Clerk Mangen and Attorney Knutson answered questions of the Council
regarding the amendment language, need for reasonable controls to assure best practices, and
providing adequate security. Assistant to the City Manager Smith advised of training provided to
City staff to assure liquor sale compliance. The Council discussed additional requirements such
as identifying the event manager, issuing wrist bands to non - minors, liquor compliance training,
offering food for consumption, servers not being allowed to drink while serving alcoholic
beverages at the event, no price discounting, identification of service hours, not serving to
intoxicated patrons, and security by licensed off -duty police officers at a level dependent upon
attendance. It was indicated that staff would create a user - friendly educational document for
applicants. Ms. Worthington stated staff would make the discussed revisions prior to
consideration of first reading. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Housh,
directing staff to schedule a public hearing on September 21, 2010, to consider Ordinance
No. 2010 -13, amending the Edina city code concerning liquor, as revised.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR LOCAL ROADWAYS REVISED AND ADOPTED Public
Works Director /City Engineer Houle presented rationale for each of the proposed revisions to the
special assessment policy for local roadways as directed by the Council at its August 17, 2010,
workshop. The Council discussed the revisions and asked questions of Mr. Houle and Mr. Wallin.
The Council suggested additional clarification regarding how the interest rate for the assessment
was computed and to draft more recent rationale for item 5 pages 2 -3. The following corrections
were requested: page 2, item 4, remove the word "then" in four instances; and, page 3, item 7b,
insert the word "be" after the word "shall." Member Housh made a motion, seconded by
Member Brindle, to adopt the special assessment policy for local roadways, as revised.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
BRAEMAR ROOM RENAMED TO JOHN VALLIERE ROOM Mayor Hovland advised of the
support to rename the "Braemar Room" at Braemar Golf Course the "John Valliere Room" in
honor of retired Braemar Golf Course Manager Valliere who had retired after 41 years. Mayor
Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving renaming the "Braemar
Room" at Braemar Golf Course the "John Valliere Room" in honor of retired Braemar Golf
Course Manager John Valliere.
Page 3
Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7. 2010
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*DATE FOR CANVASS OF GENERAL ELECTION SET — NOVEMBER 8. 2010 Motion made by
Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson setting the date of Monday, November
8, 2010, at 5:00 p.m. to canvass the results of the November 2, 2010, General Election.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -74 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS
AND CITY'S READINESS GRANT EXTENSION Motion made by Member Bennett and
seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -74, authorizing the City of
Edina to amend the public health preparedness and City's readiness initiative grant
agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -75 ADOPTED — PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
AND UTILITY CERTIFICATION SET — OCTOBER 5. 2010 AND OCTOBER 19, 2010 Motion
made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No.
2010 -75, calling public hearings for consideration of certain special assessments and
delinquent utilities for October 5, 2010, and October 19, 2010.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -73 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by
Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member
Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -73 accepting various
donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 LIQUOR LICENSE ISSUED — PEOPLE'S ORGANIC FRANCHISING
COMPANY LLC Ms. Mangen presented the application for an on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor license
for People's Organic Franchising Company LLC, dba People's Organic Coffee & Wine Cafe, 3545
Galleria, for the period beginning September 7, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011. She noted all
necessary paperwork had been filed, applicable fees paid, and background checks completed.
Caridad Versalles, 8624 Oakland Avenue, Bloomington, described their concept to offer coffee in
the morning, natural organic foods during the day, and limited wine and tap beer in the evening
along with small food plates. This cafe would also accommodate "grab and go" clientele.
Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving an on -sale wine
and 3.2 liquor license for People's Organic Franchising Company LLC, dba People's
Organic-Coffee & Wine Cafe, 3545 Galleria, for the period beginning September 7, 2010, and
ending March 31, 2011.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -76 ADOPTED — LOT DIVISION, 6116 EWING AVENUE AND 6124
EWING AVENUE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to
adopt Resolution No. 2010 -76, approving a lot division of 6116 and 6124 Ewing Avenue,
based on the following findings:
1. The lot area and width of 6116 Ewing is currently non - conforming; it does not meet the
median requirements. The resulting lot division would result in both lots meeting the
median lot area requirement.
Page 4
Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7, 2010
2. The resulting lots comply with all minimum lot size standards of Section 850 of the
zoning ordinance.
and subject to the following conditions:
1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance
standards.
2. The new fence may be installed after the approving resolution is filed at Hennepin
County.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*ENGINEERING SERVICES WEST 44TH STREET APPROVED Motion made by Member
Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson authorizing Interim City Manager to approve a
proposal for a feasibility study to reconstruct West 44th Street from just east of Brookside
Avenue to France Avenue.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
911 DISPATCH CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY APPROVED Ms.
Worthington presented the contract to provide 911 emergency dispatching services to the City of
Golden Valley for the next three years beginning January, 2011. The Council asked questions of
staff and Police Chief Long regarding call volumes, costs incurred, and acknowledged that having
an additional dispatcher would result in a benefit to Edina residents. Mr. Long and Ms.
Worthington addressed consolidation of dispatch services within Hennepin County and assured
the Council that the costs incurred to service Golden Valley would be covered by the proposed
contract. Ms. Worthington advised that dispatching options would continue to be explored and
discussed by staff. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson,
approving an agreement between Edina and Golden Valley for provision of dispatch
services and operation and maintenance of the emergency communications center.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
COMMUNITY COMMENT
No one appeared to comment.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated August 19, 2010, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund
$171,779.66; Communications Fund $4,282.88; Police Special Revenue $766.70; Working
Capital Fund $380,404.46; Equipment Replacement Fund $46,215.59; Art Center Fund
$2,727.41; Aquatic Center Fund $6,282.42; Golf Course Fund $31,857.7.5; Ice Arena Fund
$138,958.57; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $15,831.32; Liquor Fund $159,416.50;
Utility Fund $143,950.34; Storm Sewer Fund $44,896.91; Recycling Fund $37,683.00; PSTF
Agency Fund $13,141.34; TOTAL $1,198,194.85 and for approval of payment of claims dated
August 26, 2010, and consisting of 54 pages: General Fund $619,095.48; CDBG Fund
$3,157.00; Communications Fund $1,278.64; Police Special Revenue $268.00; Working
Capital Fund $981,137.31; Equipment Replacement Fund $20,857.63; Art Center Fund
$23,793.79; Golf Dome Fund $1,670.15; Aquatic Center Fund $16,368.31; Golf Course Fund
$16,997.46; Ice Arena Fund $6,133.01; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $8,740.98;
Liquor Fund $209,970.42; Utility Fund $146,174.77; Storm Sewer Fund $174,589.34;
Recycling Fund $32.57; PSTF Agency Fund $1,326.03; TOTAL $2,228,250.62; and for
approval of payment of claims dated September 2, 2010, and consisting of 30 pages:
General Fund $96,777.78; Communications Fund $378.65; Police Special Revenue
$3,585.61; Working Capital Fund $118,277.06; Equipment Replacement Fund $35,541.95;
Art Center Fund $2,574.33; Aquatic Center Fund $3,318.93; Golf Course Fund $36,195.79;
Ice Arena Fund $3,366.43; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $18,966.43; Liquor Fund
$126,504.52; Utility Fund $43,626.39; Storm Sewer Fund $23,075.65; Recycling Fund $2.00;
PSTF Agency Fund $4,742.66; TOTAL $516,934.18.
Page 5
Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7, 2010
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
CITY MANAGER CONTRACT WITH SCOTT NEAL APPROVED Mayor Hovland presented the
essential terms and conditions of the draft City Manager contract, which Scott Neal had agreed
with in principle. Mayor Hovland indicated if the contract was approved by the Council tonight, he
would so advise Mr. Neal who would then resign his position with the City of Eden Prairie and
begin employment with Edina on November 8, 2010.
The Council discussed the contract terms and payment of dues for civic club memberships.
Attorney Knutson advised that legal opinions had been rendered indicating that the City could only
pay civic club membership fees that qualified as serving a public purpose. He indicated that
employer approval was required for membership, and copies of those legal opinions would be
provided for the Council's review. The Council acknowledged that, with sick leave and vacation
days credited to Mr. Neal in the contract, he would be entitled to a payout of $10,000 should ne
leave employment immediately after assuming his new position. The GA-umn-il aGkRewledged that
,should MF. Ne-al le-ave empleyment with Edina, he would be eRtitled te a P-ayout of $1 Qwo.l
The Council indicated it understood the rationale and recommendation for a compensation
package at the statutory cap even though Edina was smaller in size than Eden Prairie. The
Council concurred that Mr. Neal was very talented, knowledgeable, and diligent, and Edina was
fortunate it could attract this level of talent. Mayor Hovland and Member Swenson were thanked
for their effort to negotiate this exceptional outcome and favorable contract. Member Swenson
made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving the city manager contract with
Scott Neal.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2010, WORK SESSION SCHEDULED Following discussion, Council
consensus was reached to direct staff to schedule a work session on Monday, September 13,
2010, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the request of Shelter Corp. to discuss matters relating to The
Water Senior Living Project.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City. Council, September 21, 2010.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the September 7, 2010, meeting available.
Page 6
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 7, 2010
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and
Chair Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by
Commissioner Swenson for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 2010, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for August 17,
2010.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Heather Worthington, Executive Director
o e
Cn
•
le f�OOxPO� -'�E9�
es
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Agenda Item HRA Item No. II
From:
John Wallin
Action
Finance Director
Discussion
Information
Date: September 21, 2010
Subject:
Resolution No. 2010 -2 Appointing Cell Smith, Interim Executive Director of Edina
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution.
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND:
The attached resolution would appoint Ceil Smith the Executive Director for the Housing
Redevelopment Authority on an interim basis. A copy of the recommended resolution, as
drafted by the City's attorney, is attached for your review.
ATTACHMENT:
HRA Resolution No. 2010 -2.
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-2
RESOLUTION APPOINTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
ON AN INTERIM BASIS
RECITALS
City of Edina
A. Heather Worthington, the interim Executive Director of the Edina Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, has submitted her resignation effective October 6, 2010.
B. The City is has appointed Scott Neal who will become the Executive Director of
the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority on November 8, 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE EDINA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
Effective October 6, 2010 Ceil Smith is appointed Executive Director of the Edina
Housing and Redevelopment Authority on an interim basis until November 8, 2010.
2. This appointment shall carry with it the duties and responsibilities associated
with the office of Executive Director, and Ceil Smith shall be listed as a signatory on all HRA
accounts.
ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment
Authority this 21St day of September, 2010.
Attest:
Its Executive Director
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
Its Chair
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND
EDINA PLANNING COMISSION
HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 7, 2010
5:05 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh
arrived at 5:10 p.m. Planning Commissioners present: Jeff Carpenter, Arlene Forrest, Michael Fischer, Michael
Schroeder, Steve Brown and Kevin Staunton. Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; Cary
Teague, Director of Planning; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; Jennifer Bennerotte, Director of Marketing &
Communications; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk.
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose of the joint meeting was to review
challenges and potential solutions for cities relative to issuance of variances since the June 2010 Supreme
Court ruling which changed the definition of hardship and virtually eliminated the ability to grant variances.
Chair Fischer reviewed the Planning Commission's work to date on the Zoning Ordinance update. He outlined
the Commission's goals over the next month relative to the proposed amendments to Edina's zoning
ordinance. Director Teague noted that the proposed ordinances would deal with primarily three topics: 1)
Non - conforming use /alternative setback ordinance, 2) Planned Unit Development ordinance, and 3) Driveway
width ordinance. Mr. Teague explained that staff had reviewed approximately three years of data regarding
variances issued within the City of Edina.
The Council, Planning Commissioners and staff discussed each proposed ordinance amendment and potential
issues relative to each amendment. Issues included: setback for second story additions, height of structures,
elevations of new vs. original structure, what happened if variances lapsed, tear downs, effect on
modifications /additions to structures in flood plains or near storm water areas, ground water issue, need for
Geo Science Engineer's data on remodels /additions, lot coverage, driveway width, permeable surface
driveways, benefits and challenges of adopting a PUD ordinance, Sketch Plan Review process and the
likelihood of the legislature enacting statute that would relieve the burden of the court decision.
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 21, 2010.
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
James B. Hovland, Mayor
MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 13, 2010
5:09 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson was absent.
Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; Cary Teague, Director of Planning; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City
Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk.
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose was to review issues related to the proposed
development: The Waters Senior Living of Edina.
Interim City Manager Worthington stated that Shelter Corp. had four items to discuss with the City Council: 1) Final Plat, 2)
Park Dedication, 3) Potential TIF Pay -As- You -Go District and 4) Issuance of a Conduit Bond. Ms. Worthington noted that staff
had reviewed the issues with Shelter Corp and believed that the proposed park dedication was fairly negotiated, but she
added the Council must determine its comfort level with each issue.
Jay Jenson, Shelter Corp. presented the Waters Senior Living of Edina's proposal for payment of park dedication. Mr. Jenson
stated that while it was clear that Shelter Corp. should pay for park dedication, it also was clear that payment should be in
relation to use. He proposed a reduction of the amount that would be due according to the ordinance, $695,000. Mr. Jenson
requested subtraction of what he termed "public" costs totaling $189,900 and half of "private recreational costs" of $385,000
for facilities built at the Waters. The subtractions would leave a park dedication fee of $312,000. "^F. jeRsen stated the
...
W] ITTW
Mr.191 M=
... ...
The Council and staff had a discussion of the City's park dedication ordinance, its background, implementation, and the
latitude granted to Council by this section of Edina's Code. Ms. Worthington noted that park dedication was collected when
there was a subdivision of land and could be land donated, land and cash or only cash. She said there must be a relationship
between the required dedication and the Park Capital Improvement Program. Director Teague reviewed the results of his
preliminary survey of surrounding communities. Concern was expressed over various aspects of the proposed dedication, and
staff was directed to supply more background to Council for another discussion.
Ms. Worthington said that the proponents have also requested the Council consider two other financing tools: establishment
of a Tax Increment Financing District "Pay -As- You -Go District" and use of the City's Conduit Bonding Authority. Mark Ruff,
Ehlers Financial Consultant for the City gave a brief overview of what would be required of the Council to establish a TIF
District and to allow the use of conduit bonds for this project.
Council discussed the "affordability" component of the TIF proposal, aed -alse issues related to the conduit bonding authority,
and the question of public benefit to justify the public expense. The proponent stated they would proceed with the project
with or without the two financing tools. The final plat and park dedication would most likely be considered by the Council
within the next sixty days. The establishment of a TIF District or authorization of conduit bond financing will be discussed at
another work session after receiving additional data on these issues.
Ms. Worthington announced to the Council her resignation effective October 6, 2010, as she had accepted a position as the
Deputy County Manager for Ramsey County. Council directed staff to place this topic for discussion on the work session for
September 21, 2010.
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
lespectfully submitted,
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 21, 2010.
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
James B. Hovland, Mayor
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item Item No II. A.
From:
Debra Mangen
® Action
City Clerk
1-1 Discussion
0 Information
Date: September 21, 2010
Subject:
Public Hearing: Ordinance No.
2010 -15 Amending Section 900 Edina Liquor Code
ACTION REQUESTED:
Hold the public hearing, review the-draft ordinance and consider granting First Reading.
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND:
At their meeting September 7, 2010, the Council reviewed draft language amending Edina's
Code to allow more charitable organizations to obtain temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor
licenses from the City. At that meeting, the Council directed staff to make changes to the
proposed ordinance language and to set a public hearing for September 21, 2010. Staff placed
the required public hearing notice in the Edina Sun Current.
Attorney Knutson has drafted the revised language for the ordinance amendment and drafted a
memorandum - explaining that Edina Code Subsection 900.13 Subdivisions 1 -8 contained many
of the additional provisions the Council requested at the September 7th meeting.
ATTACHMENT:
Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Application
Memorandum Roger Knutson
Draft Ordinance No. 2010 -15
Edina Code Section 900
f t
License on behalf of:
Add
The Event:
Location of Event:
City of Edina
4801 West 500 Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating
Liquor License
Phone: (952) 927 -8861
Fax: (952) 826 -0390
Office Use Only
Date Received
Police Approval
Notice of Hearing
Published
Council Approval Date
Phone No:
Street City State Zip
Date of Event: Time of Event:
Organization's Chief Executive Officer:
First Middle Last
Date of Birth
Organization's Treasurer:
Daytime Phone Number
Signature
First Middle Last
Date of Birth
Daytime Phone Number
Signature
THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form.
Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina.
Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data,
however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the
Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tar ID Number or Social Security Number. This information maybe used to deny issuance, renewal or
transfer of your license if you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties or interest. The Department of Revenue may
supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, the State of Minnesota Driver License
Section, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, and Ramsey County Warrant Office. You
signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. Your residence address and telephone number will be considered public data
unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and telephone number. Please sign below to indicate that you
have read this notice:
Signature X I request that my residence address and telephone number be
considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number areas follows:
Address
Telephone Number
Contact Person:
Contact's Address:
Phone No
Street City State Zip
i r 1 i
Date of Last Temporary License: No more than 2 licenses per organization per
calendar year. License must have at least 30 days between issue dates.
Location of Last Temporary
Attach a detailed drawing to scale with access points of the "licensed premises" and proposed signage,
(placement, exact dimensions, graphics and wording) shown.
Proposed capacity of licensed premises:
Barricade materials proposed:
Location & number of access points to be used:
Explain proposed security:
The above - mentioned non - profit corporation or organization hereby applies for a Temporary Intoxicating
Liquor License under and pursuant to the Edina City Code with particular attention to Section 900,
Subsection 900.13, Subd. 1 through 8, and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A.
As per Edina City Code Subsection 900.08 Paragraph L, the above - mentioned applicant is qualified to
apply for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. Attach documentation.
The above - mentioned non -profit corporation or organization agrees to waive its Constitutional Rights
against search and seizure and will freely permit peace officers to inspect its premises and agrees to
forfeiture of its license if found to have violated the Edina City Code or Minnesota Statutes providing for
the granting of this license.
I hereby solemnly swear that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of the Edina City Code and Minnesota Statutes under
which this license is granted.
Date of Application Signature of Officer Authorized to Sign For Organization
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 20
SEAL
Notary Public
Required documents:
City of Edina application
Fee
Documentation of non - profit corporation or organization
Dept. of Revenue SP:C1
Workers' Compensation
State Form #9079 (Complete Both Copies)
Liquor Liability certificate (900.05 para C)
Permit For Use of City Property (if applicable)
Additional Conditions from City Council:
License Fee: $200.00 Finance Code: 1400.4132
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Direct Dial: (651) 234 -6215
UmailAddress: rknufson@rk- lmv.coza
September 16, 2010
Thomas J, Campbell .
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas M: Scott
Elliott B. Knetsch
Joel J. Jamnik
Andrea McDowell Pochler
Ms. Debra Mangen, City Clerk
Soren M. Mattick
City of Edina,.
John F. I {elly x
50th
4801 West 50 Street
Henry A. Schaeffer, III
Alina Schwartz
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Samuel J. Edmunds
Marguerite M. McCarron
RE: TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
Dear Deb:
Enclosed please find revised draft ordinance concerning temporary on -sale liquor
licenses. The City Council discussed adding some additional provisions concern ng .
police and other issues. I have not. included them in the draft because they are already
covered in Section 900.13 of the City Code:
900.13 Special Requirements for Temporary Licenses. In addition to the
requirements of Subsection 900.10.and Subd. 4, Subd. 6 and Subd. 8 of Subsection
900.12; the following special requirements apply to the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor,
wine and intoxicating liquor sold pursuant to a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt
Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued in
accordance with this section:
Subd. 1 Licensed Premises. The licensed premises must have a physical barrier
separating the licensed premises from other areas so as to prevent the passing of
patrons in locations other than through approved entrances and exits. .
Subd. 2 Sales and Consumption. No sales or consumption of alcoholic beverages
shall be permitted beyond the licensed premises.
Subd. 3 Manager. The Council may require that the licensed premises be under the
direct supervision of a manager approved by the Police Chief. In approving the
qualifications of the manager, the Police Chief shall consider the manager's experience
C nter Curve
380 Corporate Center Curve
1380
in overseeing the operation of an establishment that serves alcoholic beverages.
317 . Eagan,
651 -452 -5000
Fax 651- 452 -5550
-wvw.ck- law.com
Ms. Debra Mangen, City Clerk
City of Edina
September 16, 2010
Page 2
Subd. 4 Police Protection. If required by the Council, the applicant shall provide, at
the applicant's expense, policing of the licensed premises by security personnel
approved by the Police Chief.
Subd. 5 Age of Servers. For a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, all
persons engaged in the service of alcoholic beverages must be not less than 21 years of
age.
Subd. 6 Hours of Sale and Consumption. In addition to the provisions of Subd. 7
and Subd. 8 of Subsection 900.10 of this Code, the Council may further restrict the
sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages pursuant to a temporary license to certain
hours.
Subd. 7 Sale Prices. No licensee shall promote the consumption of alcoholic
beverages on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in prices
which are less than those normally charged during the license term including, but not
limited to, two- for -one offers, happy hours, or other similar offers, prizes, coupons,
games or barters.
Subd. 8 Other Requirements. The City Council may impose other requirements as
it deems necessary to promote public safety.
Regards,
Roger N. Knutson
RNK:sm
Enclosure
ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -15
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE
CONCERNING LIQUOR
THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 900.04, Subparagraph F of the Edina City Code is amended to
provide as follows:
F. Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - The City Council may
issue to (1) a club or charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organization in
existence for at least three years, (2) a political committee registered under
Section 10A.14, or (3) a State university, a temporary license for the on -sale of
intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the municipality
sponsored by the licensee. The license may authorize the on -sale of intoxicating
liquor and may authorize on -sales on premises other than premises the licensee
owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may
contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full -year on-
sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. The licenses are
subject to the terms, including a license fee, imposed by the City. Licenses
issued under this subdivision are subiect to all laws and ordinances governing
the sale of intoxicating liquor except Sections 340A.409 and 340A.504,
subdivision 3, paragraph (d), and those laws and ordinances which by their
nature are not applicable. Licenses under this subdivision are not valid unless
first approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety. permits the ear;-sale of 2'
pereent malt Wq Uer intevisating malt liquor Wine .+nri intevien }inn liesper at events
spensered by pertain „rgaRizatiens. Not more than two such licenses shall be
issued to the same organization or corporation or location in a calendar year with
at least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issued for not more
than three consecutive days.
sale of Z v 2 nereent malt limier , intevinatine malt lirquerr e r win ne only _ .
Section 2. Subsection 900.08, Subparagraph L of the Edina City Code is deleted:
- •• -
- - -
Section 3. Subsection 900.09, Subdivision 1c and Subdivision 6 of the Edina City
Code are amended to provide as follows:
1 C. Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an
elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study
accredited by the State. A location which holds a license under this Section shall
not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of worship
or school that was newly located in its proximity after license issuance. The
provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent
Malt Liquor Licenses or Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses.
Subd. 6 Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1
of this Subsection, not more than four Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt
Liquor licenses
t4GesseTshall be issued for any one location in a calendar year with at least 30
days between issue dates. For purposes of this paragraph, 'location" shall mean
a physical location within 1,000 feet or the perimeter of the premises first
licensed in the calendar year.
Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
City of Edina
CHAPTER 9. LIQUOR
Section 900 - Sale of Liquor and Wine; Licensing
Liquor 900.01
900.01 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise clearly indicates, the following terms
shall have the stated meanings:
Bar. A counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine or liquor is served.
Commissioner. The State Commissioner of Public Safety.
Cafe. See definition of "restaurant" in this Subsection.
Club. Any corporation duly, organized under the laws of the State for civic, fraternal,
social. or business purposes, or for intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of.
sports, which shall have more than 50 members, and which for more than one year
shall have owned, hired or leased a building or space in a building of such extent and
character as may be suitable and adequate for the reasonable and comfortable
accommodation of its members, and whose affairs and management are conducted by a
board of directors, executive committee, or other similar body chosen by the members
at a. meeting held for the purpose, none of whose members, officers, agents or
employees are paid, directly or indirectly, any compensation by way of profit from the
distribution or sale of beverages to the members of the club or to its guests, beyond the
amount of such reasonable salary or wages as may be fixed and voted each year by the
directors or other governing body.
Food Establishment License. A license issued by the City under the provisions of
Section 721 of this Code.
Hotel. An establishment where food and lodging are regularly furnished to transients
and which has a dining room serving the general public at tables and having facilities
for seating at least 30 guests at one time, and at least 50 guest rooms.
Intoxicating Liquor. Ethyl, alcohol, and distilled, fermented, spirituous, vinous and
malt beverages containing in excess of 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight.
Intoxicating Malt Liquor. Any beer, ale or other beverage made from malt by
fermentation and containing more than 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight.
License. A license granted pursuant to.this Section.
Licensed Premises. The area shown in the license application as the place where wine
or liquor will be served or consumed.
Liquor. 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating liquor, and intoxicating-malt liquor.
Meal. Entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu.
900 -1
Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina Liquor 900.02
1
Off -Sale. Retail sale in the original package for consumption away from the premises
only.
On -Sale. Sale for consumption on the premises only.
Original Package. Any container or receptacle holding liquor, in which the liquor is
corked or sealed at the place of manufacture.
Restaurant. An establishment', under control of a single proprietor or manager,
having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment,
meals are regularly served at tables to ' the general public, and which employs an
adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests, and which has a
seating capacity for not fewer than 30 guests at one time. ;
Y.
Sale, Sell, Sold. All barters, exchanges, gifts; sales, and- other means used to obtain,
dispose of, or furnish any liquor or wine or any . other beverage, directly or indirectly,
as part ' of a commercial transaction, in violation or evasion of the provisions of this
Section, but does not include sales by State licensed liquor wholesalers selling to
licensed retailers.
State Established Legal Drinking Age. For purposes of this Section, the State
established legal age for consumption of liquor and wine is 21 years of age.
3.2 Percent Malt Liquor. Any potable beverage with an alcoholic content of more
than one -half of one percent by volume and not more than 3.2 percent by weight.
Wine. Vinous beverage created by fermentation.
900.02 Off -Sale Limited to Municipal Liquor Stores; Dispensary Established. No
intoxicating liquor, intoxicating malt liquor or wine shall be sold, or caused ' to be sold at
off -sale within the City by any person, or by any store or establishment, or by any agent or
employee of such person, store or establishment, except by the City and on the premises in the
City occupied by the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine. There is
hereby established a municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale and on -sale of liquor, and
wine. The dispensary shall be located at such suitable places in the City as the Council
determines by resolution.
Subd. 1 Off -Sale Dispensary. The following shall apply to the municipal liquor
dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine:
A. The dispensary shall be under the control of the Manager. The Manager may
appoint employees as deemed necessary to operate the dispensary in full compliance
with this Section and State Law. No person under the State established legal drinking
age shall be employed in the dispensary.
B. . The Manager may require persons employed in the dispensary to furnish a
surety bond to the City in the same manner as prescribed by Subsection 115.12 of this
Code.
900 -2 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.04
C. Subject to the requirements of 'M.S. 340A.504, the hours of operation and the
dispensary shall be established by resolution of.the Council.
D. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in Subsection
900.10 except Subd. 7 thereof shall apply to the dispensary.
Subd. 2. On -Sale Dispensary. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as
set forth in subsections 900.10, 900.11 and 900.12 shall apply to the municipal liquor
dispensary for the on -sale of liquor and wine."
900.03 License Required. No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers. to the extent
authorized by law, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any ' device, shall sell at
off -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor or at on -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt
liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor without first having obtained a license, other than sales by
the City at its municipal liquor dispensary.
900.04 License Types. Licenses shall be of eight types:
A. On -Sale Club Liquor License - permits the on -sale of liquor and wine at
qualifying clubs. Only establishments possessing an On -Sale Club License on
December 31, 1998, shall be eligible for receiving an On -Sale . Club Liquor
License pursuant to this Section.
B. On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - permits the on -sale of liquor and wine
at qualifying hotels and restaurants. A qualifying hotel with multiple points of
liquor sale and service within the hotel may operate under a single On -Sale
Intoxicating Liquor License provided that the sale of food and liquor is under
the exclusive ownership and control of the licensee. Any restaurant or other
facility serving liquor'-within a hotel which operates, under separate ownership or
control shall be considered a distinct entity for purposes of -this Section.
C. Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - permits the off -sale of 3.2
percent malt liquor at certain retail establishments.
D. On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - permits the on -sale of 3.2
percent malt liquor at certain retail establishments.
E. Wine License - permits the on -sale of wine at qualifying hotels and
restaurants. (Intoxicating malt liquor may be sold on premises holding both a
3.2 percent malt liquor on -sale license and a wine license.)
F. Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - permits the on -sale of 3.2
percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, wine and intoxicating liquor at
events sponsored by certain organizations. Not more than two such licenses
shall be issued to the same organization or corporation in a calendar year with at
least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issued for not more
than three consecutive days.- The City Council may restrict such licenses to the
sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor; intoxicating malt, liquor or wine only.
900 -3 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina Liquor 900.5
G. Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - permits the on -sale
of 3.2 percent malt liquor at events sponsored by certain organizations. Not
more than two such licenses shall be issued to the same organization or
corporation in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. Each
license shall be issuedfor not more than three consecutive. days.
H. Sunday On -Sale License . - permits the on -sale of intoxicating liquor on
Sunday. Only persons holding an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License or an On-
Sale Club Liquor License may hold a Sunday On -Sale License
900.05 License Applications; Renewal. An .application for any license required. by :. this
Section or the renewal of an existing license shall be made on forms provided by the Clerk.
The provisions of Section 160 of this Code, shall apply to all licenses required by this. Section,
and to the holders of such licenses; ;except that'licenses and renewals shall be granted or denied
in accordance with Subsection 900.06. All applications shall be 'accompanied by the fees set
forth in Subsection 900.07. Every 'license issued under this Section shall expire at 12:01 A.M.
on April 1 following its date of issuance. Renewal applications shall be submitted at least 60
days but not more than 150 days before expiration of the license. If, in the judgment of 'ihe
Council as to off -sale and on -sale licenses, good and sufficient cause.for the applicant's failure
to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the Council, may, if the other
provisions of this. Section are complied with, grant the license. In addition to the application
requirements provided in Section 160 of this Code, applicants shall also provide the following:
A. The type of license the applicant seeks;
B. A description of the type of business to be transacted on the licensed
premises;
C. Proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by M.S.
340A.801 in the manner and to the extent required by M.S. 340A.409. If the
applicant claims exemption from the requirements of said Statute, proof of
exemption shall be established by affidavit given by the applicant in form and
substance acceptable to the Clerk;
D. All forms and information required by the Police Chief, the ' Minnesota
Department of Public Safety and the Minnesota Department of Revenue;
E. Any affidavits of the applicant as required by the Clerk, on forms provided
by the Clerk, in support of the application;
F. Authorization to release information obtained in connection with the
application;
G. A statement signed by the applicant stating that he or she has reviewed and
understands the pertinent provisions of this Section and State law;
H. In the case of an application' for a Wine License, or On -Sale Intoxicating
Liquor License, the applicant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Clerk as
to compliance with the requirements of Subd. 2 of Subsection 900.12 as to the
completion of an alcohol awareness program;
9004 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.7
I. In the case of an application for a Wine License or On -Sale Intoxicating
Liquor License, the applicant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Clerk as
to compliance with the requirements of Subd. 3 of Subsection 900.12 as to the
percentage of food sold on the licensed premises. This requirement shall be
established by an affidavit of the licensee on a form provided by the Clerk. The
affidavit shall be given with each application for issuance or renewal on a Wine
License or an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, or at other times as the
Clerk may request. If the application is for the renewal of a Wine License or an
On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, the affidavit shall also include the actual
percentage of gross receipts attributable to the sale of food during the
immediately preceding 12 -month period. The Clerk shall require that any such
affidavit be verified and confirmed, on a form provided by the Clerk, by a
Certified Public Accountant. Failure or refusal of a licensee to give such
affidavit with such application, or on request of the Clerk, or any false statement
in any such affidavit, shall be grounds for denial, suspension or revocation of all
licenses held by such licensee.
J. In the case of an application for a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt
Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. The
applicant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Clerk that the applicant
complies with the requirements of Subsection 900.08 as to being a qualified
corporation or organization.
K. Any other information deemed necessary by the Manager to undertake
consideration of the application.
900.06 Consideration of Application; Public Hearing. The provisions of Section 160 of
this Code shall apply to all licenses required by Subsection 900.04 and to the holders of such
licenses, provided that all licenses shall be granted or denied by the City Council and the
Commissioner, if required by State law. The City Council shall conduct a public hearing on
the application for a new On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale
Intoxicating Liquor License within a reasonable period following receipt of a complete
application and completion of the investigation required by Subsection 900.05. A notice of the
date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper
not less than ten days before the date of the hearing. After hearing the oral and written views
of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a
specified future meeting. No hearing shall be required for the renewal or the transfer of an
On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor license.
900.07 Fees.
Subd. 1 Application Fee. The annual license application fee shall be the amount
set forth in Section. 185 of this Code. When a new Wine License or On -Sale
Intoxicating Liquor License is issued for a portion of a year, the annual license
application fee shall be prorated at the rate of one twelfth of the license fee per month
or portion of a month remaining in the license year at the time of application. The
annual license application fee for a Wine License, or for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor
900 -5 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.8
License may be refunded, less costs incurred by the City as determined by the Clerk, in
the event that the application is withdrawn by the applicant or denied by the Council.
Subd. 2 On -sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal Fee. A business with an On-
sale Intoxicating Liquor License that passes the annual compliance checks, with no
violations carrying a penalty of $500 or greater, under the Administrative Liquor
Enforcement Penalty matrix, shall be eligible for a reduction in the annual license fee.
The annual license fee reduction shall be $500, up to a maximum of $1,000 for two
consecutive license years with no violations.
Subd. 3 Refunds. A monthly pro -rata share of the annual license fee for a Wine
License or an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued pursuant to this Section may
be refunded, less the cost of issuance as determined by the Clerk, if:
A. The business permanently ceases to operate;
B. The license is transferred to a new licensee in accordance with Subsection
900.13 and the City receives a license fee for the remainder of the license term
from the transferee; or
C. A premises licensed to sell wine receives an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor
License prior to the expiration of the Wine License. In this instance, a pro -rata
share of the Wine License fee may be refunded.
Subd. 4 Investigation Fees. Upon application for a new or the transfer of an
existing Wine License, On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, On -Sale 3.2 Liquor
License or Off -Sale 3.2 Liquor License, the applicant shall deposit $500.00 with the
City for the investigation fee. If the investigation requires an out -of -state investigation,
an additional $2,000.00 shall be deposited before further processing of the application
by the City. The Clerk may from time to time require the deposit of additional
investigation fees up to the limits provided herein before further processing of the
application if the cost of investigation exceeds the amounts previously deposited. The
cost of the investigation shall be based on the expense involved, but in no event shall it
exceed $500.00 if the investigation is limited to the State or $10,000.00 if outside the
State. All deposited monies not expended on the investigation shall be refunded to the
applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in excess of the deposit shall be paid
prior to consideration of the license application by the Council. Investigation fees for
license renewal shall not exceed $200.00 unless there is a change of ownership of more
than 10% cumulatively over the then existing license period.
900.08 Persons Ineligible for License. The following restrictions apply to any applicant
who is a natural person, a general partner if the applicant is a partnership or a corporate officer
if the applicant is a corporation. No license shall be granted to:
Any manufacturer, brewer, or wholesaler as defined in M.S. 340A.101, or any manufacturer
of 3.2 percent malt liquor, or to any person who has a financial interest, directly or indirectly,
in such manufacturer, brewer or wholesaler.
A. Any person under the State established legal drinking age.
900 -6 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina Liquor 900.8
B. Any person convicted of any willful violation of any law of the United States or any
provision of State Law or this Code with regard to the manufacture, sale or distribution
of liquor.
C. Any person not eligible under M.S. 340A.402, the regulations of the Commissioner
or Section 160 of this Code.
D. Any person who has (i), been convicted, within the five years prior to the application
for a license, of any violation of any law of the United States, the State, or any other
state or territory, or, of any local ordinance with regard to: (a) the manufacture, sale,
distribution or possession for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor or other
controlled substances as defined by State Statute, (b) gambling, (c) theft, or (d) vice; or
(ii) had an intoxicating liquor license, including a wine on -sale license, revoked for any
Violation of any statutes, ordinances or regulations relating to the manufacture, sale,
distribution or possession of liquor or wine.
E. Any person who has applied for or holds a, federal wholesale or retail liquor dealer's
special stamp or a federal or State gambling or gaming stamp or license.
F. Any person who is an employee or elected official of the City.
G. Any person who has falsified any information given either in the application or in
the process of investigation.
H. Any person who upon renewal, has been found in violation of any provision of this
Section or applicable State Law.
I. If an individual, any person-who is not a U.S. citizen or resident alien.
J. Any person who is financially indebted to a person who is disqualified under this
Subd.
K. If for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, any organization other than
the Edina Chamber of Commerce, the 50th and France Business and Professional
Association, the Edina Community Foundation or the City. A holder of a Temporary
On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License -shall not be eligible to hold a Temporary On -Sale
3.2 Percent Liquor License during all or part of the same license term.
L. If for a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License, any person who is not
a non - profit corporation or organization that has been in existence for at least three
years where the serving of alcoholic beverages is incidental to and not the main purpose
of the organization .and which is organized for i) charitable or religious purposes for
which gifts are deductible from the income of the donor under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as now enacted or as supplemented- or amended, ii), service to the nation,
state or community, iii) social purposes, iv) promotion of sports, v) promotion of
persons to elective office, or vi) promotion of business within the community. A holder
of a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License shall not be eligible to hold a
Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License during all or part of 'the same license
term.
900 -7 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.09
M.. If for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, any person who holds an interest
in an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License or has made application for.such a license for
more than three locations in the City. It is the intent hereof that no person may possess
or hold an interest in more than three On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses at one time
in the , City. For purposes hereof, "interest includes :any,.. pecuniary interest in the
ownership, operation, management or profits of the establishment, but does not include:
i) bona fide loans, rental agreements, open accounts or other obligations held with or
without security arising out of the ordinary and regular course of business or selling or
leasing merchandise,..- fixtures or supplies to such establishment or ii) any interest of five
percent or .less in any corporation holding an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License
900.09 Places Ineligible for a License
Subd. 1 General Restrictions. No off -sale or 'on -sale license shall be granted or
renewed for:
A. Any property on which taxes, assessments or other financial claims of the
State; County or City .are due, .delinquent or unpaid.
B. Any property on which the business is to be conducted is owned by a person
who is ineligible for a license pursuant to Subsection 900.08
C. Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an
elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study
accredited by the State. A location which holds a license under this Section shall
not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of
worship or school that was newly located in its proximity after license issuance.
The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to Temporary On -Sale 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor Licenses.
D. Any property where a license issued under this Section has been revoked
during the preceding year unless the issuance of the license is unanimously
approved by the Council then present.
E. Any property where the conduct of the business is prohibited by Section 850
of this Code.
F. Any property not eligible under M.S. 340A and the regulations of the
Commissioner.
G. Any property used as asexually oriented business as defined by Section 850
of this Code.
Subd. 2 Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt .Liquor Licenses. In addition to the
requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor
License shall be granted to any theater, recreation establishment, public dancing place
or establishment holding any on -sale license.
Subd.3 On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses. In addition to the
requirements of Subd.1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License
900 -8 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.09
shall be granted for establishments other than (i) private clubs which have been
incorporated for more than ten years and which own and operate club houses for their
members in which the serving of such liquor is incidental to and not the major purpose
of such club, (ii) restaurants, (iii) golf courses, (iv) the Edina Golf Dome, (v) bowling
centers and (vi) hotels. The provisions of this Subdivision do not apply to Temporary
On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses.
Subd. 4 Wine Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this
Subsection, no Wine License shall be granted to any establishment other than a
restaurant located in the PCD -1, PCD -2, PCD -3 Subdistricts, the Mixed Development
District or the Planned Office District.
Subd. 5 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses. In addition to the requirements of
Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to
i) any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3,
POD -2 Subdistricts or the Mixed Development District as established by Section 850 of
this Code; ii) any amusement or recreation establishment including amusement arcades,
pool halls or establishments offering amusement devices which means:
A. A machine which upon the insertion of a coin, slug or other token, or upon
payment of a fee, operates, or may be operated, as a game, contest or other
amusement.
B. Miniature pool tables, bowling machines, shuffle boards, electric rifle or gun
ranges, and machines patterned after baseball, basketball, hockey and similar games
and like machines.
C. Amusement devices designated for and used exclusively by children, such as, but
not limited to, kiddie cars, miniature airplane rides, mechanical horses, and other
miniature mechanical devices
In addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any
establishment located in the PCD -2 Subdistrict which will contain more than 200 seats;
provided, however, a premises in the PCD -2 Subdistrict holding a wine license issued
by the City which was in effect on December 31, 1998, and which contains more that
200 seats may be issued an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, but the licensed
premises shall not be thereafter expanded to include more seats than existed on
December 31, 1998. For purposes of the preceding sentence, outdoor, seasonal dining
areas shall not be included in the seat count provided that such outdoor seating
comprises 20 percent or less of the total seating capacity of the licensed premises.
In addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any
establishment that has bowling lanes or bocce courts except to a restaurant and subject
to the following:
A. Not more than 50% of the gross floor area of the licensed premises shall
comprise bowling lanes or bocce ball courts. For purposes hereof, each bowling lane
900 -9 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.10
shall be deemed to measure 650 square feet and each bocce ball lane shall be deemed
to measure 900 square feet.
B. Machines or amusement devices as defined by Section 220 of this Code shall not
be permitted in the licensed premises.
C. Bowling lanes and bocce courts and lanes shall be located indoors. All exterior
windows and doors adjoining areas occupied by bowling lanes or bocce ball courts
must remain closed between the hours of 10 PM and 9 AM.
D. Outdoor games are prohibited.
Subd. 6 Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd 1 of this
Subsection, not more than four Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses
and not more than two Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses shall be issued
for any one location in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. For
purposes of this paragraph, "location" shall mean a physical location within 1000 feet
or the perimeter of the premises first licensed in the calendar year.
900.10 General Restrictions; Conditions of Sale.
Subd. 1 Conduct. Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of the
licensee's place of business and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order.
Subd. _ 2 Age. No wine or liquor shall be sold to any person under the State
established legal drinking age, or to an intoxicated person, directly or indirectly.
Subd. 3 Under Age Workers. No person under the age of 18 shall serve or sell
liquor or wine.
Subd. 4 Gambling and Prostitution. No licensee shall keep, possess or operate, or
permit the keeping, possession or operation on the licensed premises, or in any room
adjoining the licensed premises controlled by the licensee, any slot machines, dice or
other gambling equipment as defined in M.S. 349.30, nor permit any gambling therein,
nor permit the licensed premises or any room in the same or in any adjoining building,
directly or indirectly under licensee's control, to be used as a resort for prostitutes or
other disorderly persons; provided, however, that lawful gambling may be carried on if
allowed by this Code and where allowed by a license issued pursuant to M.S. 349 or
this Code.
Subd. 5 Manufacturer or Distiller of Malt Liquor. No equipment or fixture in
any licensed place shall be owned in whole or in part by any manufacturer or brewer,
as defined in M.S. 340A, of wine or liquor.
Subd. 6 Open to Inspection. All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by
any police officer or other designated officer or employee of the City at any time there
are persons within the licensed premises.
900 -10 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.10
Subd. 7 Hours - of Sale. The hours and days of sale shall be as set forth in M.S.
340A.504. Except, however:
D. Establishments holding a Wine License under this Section or establishments
holding both an On -Sale Club Liquor License and a Sunday On -Sale License
under" this Section may sell intoxicating liquor or wine in conjunction with the
sale of.food between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 midnight on Sundays,
provided that the licensee is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Air Act,
and
E. Establishments holding both an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and a
Sunday ` On -Sale License may sell intoxicating liquor and wine in conjunction
with the sale of food between the hours of 10:00 A.M. on Sundays and r:00
A %M. on Mondays.
Subd. 8 Hours of Consumption. No liquor or wine shall be consumed by any
person on, in or about a licensed premises more than 30 minutes following the time
established by this Subsection for cessation of the sale of wine or liquor.
Subd. - 9 No Liquor or Wine in Non - Licensed Food Establishments. Except as
permitted by a license issued pursuant to this Section, no person shall take or carry any
wine or liquor into any food establishment as defined in Section 721 of this Code.
Subd. 10 Mixing or Sale for Mixing Prohibited. Except as permitted by a license
issued pursuant to this Section, no person shall mix with liquor or wine or sell for the
purpose of mixing with liquor or wine, any soft drink, other liquor or beverage in any
food establishment as defined in Section 721 of this Code. -
Subd. 11 Illegal to Permit Mixing. Except as permitted by a license issued pursuant
to this Section, no person shall consume, or permit the consumption, mixing or spiking
of any beverage by adding to the same any liquor, in any building or place operated as
a food establishmentas defined in Section 721 of this Code. The fact that any person in
any food establishment, as defined in Section 721 of this Code, sold any liquid or
beverage to a person who thereupon and therein added to such liquid or beverage any
liquor or wine shall be prima facie evidence that such liquid or beverage was sold by
such person for, the purpose of adding liquor or wine and shall be prima facie evidence
that such person and the person's employer permitted the mixing or spiking of such
liquid by adding wine or liquor.
Subd. 12 Bottle Clubs Prohibited. Except as permitted by a license issued pursuant
to this Section, establishments or clubs that directly or indirectly allow the consumption
or display of wine or liquor, or knowingly serve any liquid for the purpose of mixing
With liquor or wine, shall be prohibited. Permits for bottle clubs issued by the
Commissioner under M.S. 340A.414 shall not be approved by the Council.
Subd. 13 Posting of License. A license issued under this Section shall be posted in a
conspicuous place in the licensed premises.
900 -11 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.12
Subd. 14 Compact °and Contiguous Premises. A license :issued under this Section is
only effective for the compact and contiguous space specified in, the approved license
application. No sales or consumption of wine or liquor shall be permitted beyond the
licensed premises. The licensed premises shall - not be increased in size or seating
capacity during the then license period.
Subd. 15 Sobriety and Order. A licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of
business being operated and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order.
Subd. 16 Adult Entertainment Prohibited. The Findings, Purpose and Objectives
of Section 1,345 of the City Code:are.hereby incorporated by reference. No licensee
shall permit any specified sexual activities, the presentation or display of any specified
anatomical, areas or the conduct of a sexually oriented business all as defined by Section
850 of this Code on the licensed premises or in areas adjoining the licensed premises
where such activities or the conduct of such a business can be seen by patrons of the
licensed premises.
Subd. 17 State Law. All applicable provisions of State Law shall be complied with in
connection, with the sale of wine and liquor.
900.11 Special Requirements for the On -Sale of 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor. In addition to
the requirements imposed by Subsection 900. 10, the following special requirements apply
to the on -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor:
Subd. 1 Place of Serving and Consumption. 3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant
to a 3.2 percent malt liquor license shall be served and consumed at tables in the dining
or refreshment room on the licensed premises and shall: not be consumed or served at
bars; provided, the same may be consumed or served at the following locations:
A. At counters where food is regularly served and consumed.
B. On decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the
licensed premises.
C. On grounds of a golf course.
Subd. 2 Temporary Licenses. The provisions of Subd. 1 of this Subsection do not
apply to 3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant to a Temporary 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor
License.
900.12 Special Requirements for the On -Sale of Wine, Intoxicating Malt Liquor and
Intoxicating Liquor. In addition to the requirements of Subsection 90.0. 10, the following
special requirements apply to the sale of wine, intoxicating malt liquor and intoxicating
liquor sold pursuant to a Wine License or and On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued
in accordance with this Section:
Subd. 1 Licensed Premises. The licensed premises must:
A. Have an exclusive entrance from and exit to the exterior of the building in
which the license premises is located or to a public concourse or public lobby,
900 -12 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edii a
Liquor 900.12
and have a physical barrier separating the licensed premises from other areas so
as to prevent the passing of patrons other than through the required entrances
and exits. -
B. Have a valid food establishment license issued pursuant to Section 721 of
this Code and have adequate space, as determined by the Sanitarian, for the
storage, preparation and handling or service of food, wine, and liquor.
C. The premises shall not' have more than 15 percent of its seating capacity
located at a bar or service counter.
Subd. 2 Alcohol Awareness Training.
A. Within 30 days following the issuance of a new Wine License or a new On-
Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, not less than 75 % of the .employees authorized
to serve or sell wine or liquor on the licensed premises shall have completed an
alcohol awareness program approved by the Police Chief.
B. Not less than 75% of the employees authorized to serve or sell wine or
liquor on the licensed premises must complete an alcohol awareness program
approved by the Police Chief within 90 days prior to an application for license
renewal for a Wine License or a On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License.
Subd. 3 Percentage of Food Sold. Not less than 60 percent of the restaurant's or
hotel's gross receipts from the combined sale of food, non = alcoholic beverages, wine
and liquor, on an annual basis, shall be attributable to the sale of food and non-
alcoholic beverages.
Subd. 4 Limit of Alcohol Strength. No wine over 14 percent alcohol by volume
may be sold or consumed on a premises holding a Wine License.
Subd. 5 Denied Sales or Consumption. No sales or consumption of wine or liquor
shall be permitted beyond the licensed premises.
Subd. 6 Container Volume Restrictions. Wine may not be sold, served or
consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter:
Subd. 7 Sale Prices. No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine or liquor
on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in prices which are less
than those normally charged on the then regularly used menu, including, but not limited
to, two - for -one or similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters.
Subd. 8 Diluting, Changing, or Tampering with Wine or Liquor Prohibited. No
licensee shall sell, offer for sale or keep for sale, wine or liquor in any original package
that has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall directly or through any other
person, dilute, or in any manner tamper with, the contents of any original package so as
to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original package.
Possession on the premises by the licensee of any wine in the original package differing
in composition, alcoholic content or type from the wine received from the manufacturer
90043 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.13
or wholesaler from whom it was purchased shall, be prima facie evidence that the
contents of the original package have been, diluted, changed or tampered with.
Subd. 9 . Sales in Hotels. No sale of wine or liquor shall be made to or in guest
rooms of hotels unless:
A. The rules of such hotel provide.for the service of meals in guest rooms;
B. The sale of such wine and liquor is made in the manner which ;conforms to
the requirements of Subsection 900.12;
C.. Such sales ,is incidental to the regular service of meals to guests in their
rooms; and
D. The rules. of such hotel- and the description, location, and number of such
guest rooms are fully set out in the license application.
900.13 Special Requirements for Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of
Subsection 900.09 and Subd 4, Subd 6 and Subd 8 of Subsection 900.12, the following special
requirements apply to :the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating liquor sold
pursuant to ,.a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale
Intoxicating Liquor License issued in accordance with `this'Section:
Subd. l Licensed, Premises. The licensed premises must have a physical barrier
separating the licensed: premises from other areas so as to prevent the passing of patrons
in locations other than through approved entrances and exits.
Subd. 2 Sales and Consumption. No sales or consumption of alcoholic beverages
shall be permitted beyond the licensed.premises.
Subd. 3 Manager. The Council may require that the licensed premises be under the
direct supervision of a manager approved by the Police Chief. In approving the
qualifications of the manager, the Police Chief shall consider the manager's experience
in overseeing the operation of an establishment that serves alcoholic beverages.
Subd. 4 Police °Protection. If required by the. Council, the applicant shall provide, at
the applicant's expense, policing of the license premises by security personnel approved
by the Police Chief.
Subd 5 Age of ,Servers. For. a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, all
persons engaged in the service of alcoholic beverages must be not less than 21 years of
age.
Subd. 6 Hours of Sale and Consumption. In addition to the provisions of Subd. 7
and Subd. 8 of Subsection 900.10 of this Code, the Council may further restrict the sale
and consumption of alcoholic beverages pursuant to a temporary license to certain
hours.
Subd. 7 Sale Prices. No licensee shall promote the consumption of alcoholic
beverages on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in prices
900 -14 Supplement 2010 -01
-City-of Edina,
- . _.. Liquor 900.17
which are less than those normally charged during the license term including, but not
limited to, two- for -one .offers, happy hours, or other similar offers, prizes, coupons,
games or barters. .
Subd. 8 Other Requirements. The City Council may impose other requirements, as it
deems necessary to promote public safety.
900.14 , Restrictions on Transfer of License. No license, shall be transferred to any person
or premises by 'the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was
granted; ;by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise or descent or
involuntarily by the operation of .law, without the person and premises to whom and to;.which
the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing all of the
information required in an original application, and complying with all requirements for an
original license, and receiving the approyal ' of the Council, and where required, the
Commissioner. Any change in the persons named in the original _application or any change in
the information in such original application shall be deemed a transfer for the purposes of this
Section. Provided, however, the following changes, shall not be deemed a transfer:
A. A change in the ownership of a limited partnership comprising 10% or less
cumulatively of the limited partnership during the then license period;
B. A change in ownership of a corporation comprising 10% or less cumulatively of
the stock owners during the then license period; or
C. A change in one of the corporation's officers during the term of the then license.
Provided, however, the corporation shall give notice of a change, in officer to the
Clerk and the new officer shall comply with all requirements of this Section Wand
Section 160 of this Code.
900.15 Penalties; Revocation or Suspension. The penalty and remedy provisions of M.S.
340A.415 are hereby adopted and made a part of this Code and shall be useable by the City to
enforce this . Section in addition to the provisions of Sections 100 and 160 of this Code.
.Provided, however, the hearing required by said Statute before a license can be suspended or
revoked shall be before the Council and shall be held. pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Section 160 of this Code.
900.16 Inactive Licenses. The City Council may revoke an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor
License granted to an establishment which has i) failed to make satisfactory progress toward
completion of the construction of a new licensed premises or ii) ceased operation for a period
of six months or more. The provisions of Subsection 900.14 shall apply to such revocations.
900.17 Incorporation by Reference. The provisions of M.S. 340A. which are referenced
in this Section are hereby adopted 'and incorporated by reference and made a part of this
Section, including all regulations of the Commissioner which relate to such incorporated
provisions of M.S. 340A.
History: Ord 902 adopted 1- 11 -84; amended by Ord 902 -Al 4- 24 -85; Ord 902 -A2 12- 11 -85;
Ord 902 -A3 4- 23 -86; Ord 902 -A4 6- 25 -86; Ord 902 -A6 12- 19 -89; Ord 902 -A7 5- 23 -90; 'Ord
902 -A8 3- 17 -91; Ord 902 -A9 3- 27 -91; Ord 902 -A9; Ord 902 -A10 4- 10 -91; Subsection 900.22
repealed by Ord 1993 -1 1- 20 -93; Ord 1993 -11 10- 27 -93; Subsection 900.26 repealed by Ord
900 -15 Supplement 2010 -01
City of Edina
Liquor 900.17
1994 -10 10- 12 -94; amended by Ord 1995 -11 12- 19 -95; amended by Ord 1997 -14 12 -1 -97;
amended by Ord 1998 -3 4 -6 -98, recodified by Ord 1999 -4 3 -1 -99; amended by 1999 -7; 3 -15-
99; amended by Ord 2000 -13 12- 19 -00; amended by Ord 2001 -6; amended by Ord 2001 -8, 1-
20-01; amended by Ord 2002 -10, 1- 21 -03; amended by Ord 2004 -02, 3- 16 -04; Ord. 2004 -08,
5- 27 -04; Ord 2005 -05 6- 30 -05; Ord 2006 -10, 12 -5 -06; Ord 2008 -07, 06- 17 -08; 2010 -13, 6 -15-
10
Reference: Minnesota Laws 1973, Chapter 441 (Sunday sale licenses for clubs); Minnesota
Laws, 1980, Chapter 410 (Sales at Edina Foundation Ball), M.S. 340A, 349
Cross Reference: Sections 100, 160, 185, 721, 850; Subsection 115.12; Subsections 1230.02;
1230.07; 1230.08
900 -16 Supplement 2010 -01
tNA.
oe
•j •
�CORPOPA� °-
1888
AGENDA ITEM ILB
Continue Public Hearing to October 5, 2010
New Liquor License Pinstripes
No packet data
❑ Oral presentation
F-] Information coming
�Af �
ow e
Cn
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF
$20,000 /CHANGE ORDER
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III.A.
From: Name of Author: John Keprios
Title: Director of Parks and Recreation
Date: Date of Meeting: September 21, 2010
Subject: Installation of Hockey Rink Lights and Poles — Pamela Park & Walnut Ridge
Park
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received:
Bid or Quote Expiration Date:
September 1, 2010
October 1, 2010
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Gunnar Electric, Inc. 1. $29,450.00
2. Sports Technology, Inc. 2. $31,450.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Gunnar Electric, Inc. $29,450.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for installation of two (2) 40 foot galvanized steel poles, pre- stressed concrete bases,
eight (8) Musco Lighting sport light fixtures and luminaire assemblies; each to be placed at
Pamela Park and Walnut Ridge Park hockey rinks. On August 17, 2010, the Council approved
the purchase of the poles and assemblies from Graybar Company which was purchased through
the U.S. Communities Cooperative Bid Program #416005118 for a total of $39,316.11. On that
purchase order request, I mistakenly stated that the purchase included installation; whereas, I
intended to state that it included purchase and delivery. This installation purchase order request
includes costs for permits, labor, wiring, conduit and miscellaneous parts needed to install the 40
foot steel poles, pre- stressed concrete bases and all specified light fixtures and assemblies.
This is a 2010 Capital Improvement Plan project and total project costs are estimated to be
$120,000; however, we have been awarded a $60,000 grant from the Hennepin Sports Program
of Hennepin County for this project. If approved by Council, the light standards and fixtures will
be installed no later than November 1, 2010.
gnature
The Recommended Bid is Y
within budget
not within budget
Park and Recreation
Departmen
John Wallin, Finance Director
Heather Worthington, City Mdnager
o /te
Cn
•J'� %���. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
lase
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: September 21, 2010 AGENDA ITEM III.B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 70th Street Improvements, Contract No. ENG 10 -3; Improvement
Nos. BA -367, SS -457, STS -369, WM -503, TS 43 & 44, and L57
DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE
ber 9. 2010
Company
1. Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
2. Palda & Sons, Inc.
3. Max Steininger, Inc.
4. Valley Paving, Inc.
5. Eureka Construction
6. Midwest Asphalt Corporation
7. Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc.
8. C.S. McCrossan, Inc.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
November 9. 2010
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 2,819,703.75
$ 3,074,185.87
$ 3,100,842.65
$ 3,111,412.74
$ 3,183,433.04
$ 3,307,636.60
$ 3,613,775.49
$ 3,713,734.65
$ 29819,703.75
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This project is for street and utility improvements for West 70th Street from TH100 to France Avenue.
The project includes reconstructing the existing roadway with a bituminous pavement, installing integral
concrete curb and gutter and bike lanes, installing a traffic signal at West .Shore Drive and West 70th
Street, upgrading the traffic signal at Cornelia Drive and West 70th Street, replacing the overhead street
lights, rehabilitating the sanitary sewers and watermain where needed, and upgrading the storm sewer
systems. Landscaping for the project will be bid this coming spring and installed in the spring of 2012.
The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the December 15, 2009, Public Hearing. This
project will be funded by MSA funds, special assessments, and respective utility funds. The Feasibility
Study overall, project cost estimate was $3,057,600. Staff recommends awarding the project to
Northwest Asphalt. Inc.
ignature
The Recommended Bid is X
within budget
Public Works — Engineering
Department
not within bud et J n Wallin, Finance Director
Heather Worthington, Interim Ci Manager
4A,
o Le W\�N
1 88
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
Item No. IV.A.
From:
John Wallin
® Action
Finance Director
F-1 ` Discussion
Information
Date: September 21, 2010
Subject:
Call for Sale of Bonds — Resolution No. 2010 -78
Providing for Sale of
$9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A and
Resolution 2010 -79 Providing for Sale of $2,595,000 G. O. Bonds, Series
2010B
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution 2010 -78 Providing for the Sale of $9,225,000 General.Obligation
Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A and Resolution 2010 -79 Providing for
the Sale of $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B.
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND:
The $9,225,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A
would refund the Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 which were originally
issued for the City Hall and Police Facility. In February 2010 the City Council undertook
the required steps to authorize the City to issue Capital Improvement Plan Bonds in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The estimated saving by this
refunding would be approximately $85,000 per year beginning in the 2011 taxes
payable year.
The $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B has two purposes. The first
purpose is to finance $2,355,000 of the 2010 street reconstruction projects. The second
purpose of the bonds is to finance $240,000 in equipment purchases levied in the 2010
budget under equipment certificates.
ATTACHMENT:
Resolution 2010 -78
Resolution 2010 -79
Pre -Sale Report for $9,225,000 G. O. CIP Bonds, Series 2010A
Pre -Sale Report for $2,595,000 G. O. Bonds, Series 2010B
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-78
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF $9,225,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, SERIES 2010A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it
is necessary and expedient to ;issue � the City's $9,225,000 General " Obligation Capital
Improvement Plan .Bonds, Series 2010A (the "Bonds "), to refinance Housing and
Redevelopment Authority's remaining Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, for interest
savings;
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "),
as- its - independent - financial - advisor - for - the - Bonds- and -is therefore authorized -to solicit
proposals in accordance with Minnesofa Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota:
1. Authorization, Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the
sale of the Bonds.
2. Meeting, Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on October 19, 2010,
for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are
hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an. official
statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
Approved.this 21st day of September 2010.
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
James B. Hovland, Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached'and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-79
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR TH&SALE OF $2,595,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2010B
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is
necessary and expedient to issue the City's $2,59500, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B (the
"Bonds "), to fund equipment purchases in the City and for street reconstruction projects in the City;
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc.; in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its
independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes; Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City.of Edina, Minnesota:
1. Authorization; Fiiidines. The City Council hereby" authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals, for the sale of
the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening.. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on October 19, 2010, for the
purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement.' In connection with said sale, the officers or, employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
Approved this 21st day of September 2010.
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF. MINNESOTA )
COUNTY. OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
James B. Hovland, Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_.
City Clerk
September 21, 2010
Pre -Sale Report for
$912251000 G. O. CIP Bonds, Series 2010A
City of Edina, Minnesota
. -1K
� e
ISEHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
Debt Issuance Services
www.ehlers- inc.com
Minnesota phone. 651 - 697 -8500 3060 Centre Pointe Drive
Offices also In Wisconsin and Illinois fax 651- 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1122
Debt Issuance Services
Details of Proposed Debt
Proposed Issues: $9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A to be
secured by the full faith and credit of the taxpayers of the City of Edina
(the "Bonds ").
Purpose: To provide funds sufficient fora refunding/refinancing of all of the HRH's
outstanding Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (City of Edina
Annual Appropriation Lease Obligation), dated January 16, 2002 (the
"Prior Bonds "). The Prior Bonds were issued in the amount of
$12,410,000 for a new City Hall and police facility, with $8,500,000 in
outstanding principal today. The Prior Bonds are not callable until
February 1, 2012. The Bonds will be issued as a full net cash advance
refunding, with the proceeds of the Bonds to be placed in escrow to pay all
debt service on the Prior Bonds through the call date. The savings will
occur with taxes payable in 2011 through 2020 of approximately $85,000
per year. Current interest rates are over 5.25% and new interest rates
should be less than 2.5 %.
Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 475.
In early 2010, the City previously undertook the required steps to
authorize a Capital Improvement Plan bond (not to exceed $9,500,000)
through a public hearing and a 30 day waiting period for a reverse
referendum.
Funding Source: It is the intent of the City to utilize the same source of payment originally
pledged to the Prior Bonds, an annual property tax levy, to make all debt
service payments.
Risk Factors: Due to low investment rates in the escrow fund between now and the call
date in early 2012, there will be "negative arbitrage" or a lower investment
yield than the yield on the new Bonds. If the City believes that interest
rates will remain the same or even go up slightly in the next year, it would
be better to wait until late 2011 to undertake the refunding.
Arbitrage Monitoring: The City will need to monitor its debt service funds to insure compliance
with IRS parameters and to avoid penalties for carrying too high of a
balance during the life of the issue.
Rating: The Bonds are anticipated to be rated by Moody's at an "Aaa" level and by
Standard & Poor's at an "AAA" level.
4) Presale Report
January 12, 2010
Page 2
Debt Issuance Services
Bank Qualification: Because the City is issuing less than $30 Million in the calendar year, the
City will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations.
Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds.
Term/Call Feature: Interest is payable each six months. Principal on the Bonds will be due on
February 1 in the years 2011 through 2022. The Bonds will be callable
again on February 1, 2020.
Other
Considerations: We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's
outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities.
Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule
Pre -Sale Review by Council:
Distribute Official Statement:
Conference with Rating Agencies:
HRA Meeting to Call Prior Bonds
City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds
Estimated Closing Date:
September 21, 2010
October 8, 2010
Week of October 11th, 2010
October 19, 2010
October 19, 2010
November 23, 2010
Attachments
Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed Wth Bond Sale
Sources and Uses of Funds
Proposed Debt Service Schedule
Ehlers Contacts:
Financial Advisors:
Bond Analysts:
Bond Sale Coordinator:
Jon North
Mark Ruff
Diana Lockard
Debbie Holmes
Alicia Aulwes
(651) 697 -8545
(651) 697 -8505
(651) 697 -8534
(651) 697 -8536
(651) 697 -8523
The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for
review prior to the sale date.
.4) Presale Report
January 12, 2010
Page 3
Edina HRA MN
$9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
(Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$12,410,000 ) RA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002)
Table of Contents
Report
Sources & Uses I
Prior Original Debt Service 2
Debt Service Schedule 3
Debt Service Comparison 4
Escrow Fund Cashflow 5
10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/18/2010 1 8:20 AM
Leaders Ehlers
Edina HRA, MN
to ')')S nnn r. n Rnnds_ Series 2010
(Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002)
Sources & Uses
Dated 111011201101 Delivered 11/01/2010
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds
$9,225,000.00
$9,225,000.00
Total Sources
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (0 800 %)
73,800.00
64,000.00
Costs of Issuance
Deposit to Net Cash Escrow Fund
9-084-818.47
2,381.53
RoundinP Amount _ __ __
$9,225,000.00
Total Uses
10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9116/2010 1 8:20 AM
Edina HRA, MN
$12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002
Prior Original Debt Service
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
Fiscal Total
02/01/2011
600,000.00
4.600%
214,780.63
814,780.63
814,780.63
08/01/2011
-
-
200,980.63
200,980.63
-
02/01/2012
630,000.00
4.800%
200,980.63
830,980.63
1,031,961.26
08/01/2012
-
-
185,860.63
185,860.63
02/01/2013
660,000.00
4.900%
185 860.63
845,860.63
1,031,721_.26
08/01/2013
-
-
169,690.63
169,690.63
02/01/2014
690,000.00
5.000%
169,690.63
859,690.63
1,029,381.26
08/01/2014
-
-
152,440.63
152,440.63
02101/2015
725,000.00
5.000%
152,440.63
877,440.63
1,029,881.26
08/01/2015
134,315.63
134,315.63 _
02/01/2016
760,000.00
5.125%
134,315.63
894,315.63
1,028,631.26
08/01/2016
-
-
114,840.63
114,840.63
02/01/2017
800,000.00
5.125%
114,840.63
914,840.63
1,029,681.26
08/01/2017
-
-
94,340.63
94,340.63
02/01/2018
840,000.00
5.125%
94 340.63
934,340.63
1,028 681.26
08/01/2018
-
-
72,815.63
72,815.63
02/01/2019
885,000.00
5.125%
72,815.63
957,815.63
1,030,631.26
08/01/2019
-
-
50,137.50
50,137.50
02101/2020
930,000.00
5.250%
50,137.50
980,137.50
1,030,275.00
08/01 /2020
-
25 725.00
25,725.00
02/01/2021
980,000.00
5.250%
25,725.00
1,005,725.00
1,031,450.00
Total
$8,500,000.00
-
$2,617,075.71
$11,117,075.71
-
Yield Statistics
Average Life
5.738 Years
Weighted Average Maturity
(Par Basis)
5.738 Years
Average Coupon
5.3656088%
Refunding Bond Information
Refunding Dated Date
11/01/2010
Refunding Delivery Date
11/01/2010
Ser 02 $12.41 M HRA Pub Pr I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/16/2010 1 8:20 AM
Leaders Ehlers
•
Edina HRA MN
$9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
(Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002)
Debt: Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total
11/01/2010
-
-
-
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes
1.9299849%
02101/2011
780,000.00
0.400%
35;145.00
815,145.00
815,145.00
08/0112011
68;730:00
68,730A0
02/01/2012
800,000.00
0.500%
68,730.00'
868,730.00
937,460.00
08/01/2012
-
-
66730.00
66730.00
-
02/61/2013
805,000.00
0.750%
66,730.00
871,730.00
938_,460.00
08/01/2013
-
-
63,711.25
63,711.25
-
02/01/2014
810,000.00
1.000%
63,711.25
873,711.25
937,422.50
08/01/2014
-
-
59,66125
59,661.25
-
02/01/2015
820,000.00
1 300%
59 661.25
879 661.25
939,322.50
08/01/2015
-
-
54,331.25
54,331.25
02101 /2016
830,000.00
1.550%
54,331.25
884,331.25
938,662.50
08/01/2016
-
-
47,898.75
47,898.75
-
02/01/2017
840,000.00
1.850%
47,898.75
887,898.75
935,797.50
08/01/2017
-
40 128.75
40 128.75
-
02/01/2018
855,000.00
2.000%
40,128.75
895,128.75
935,257.50
08/01/2018
-
-
31,578.75
31,578.75
-
02/01/2019
875,000.00
2.200%
31,578.75
906,578.75
938,157.50
08/01/2019
-
-
21,953.75
21,953.75
02/01/2020
895 000.00
2.350 %_._
21,953.75
916,953.75
938,907.50
08/01/2020
- -
-
11,437.50
11,437.50
-
02/01/2021
915,000.00
2.500%
11,437.50
926,437.50
937,875.00
Total
$9,225,000.00
-
$967,467.50
$10,192,467.50
-
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $49.806.25
Average Life 5.399 Years
Average Coupon 1.9424620%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
2.0906362%
True Interest Cost (TIC)
2.0893729%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes
1.9299849%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)
2.2291426%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 1.9424620%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.399 Years
10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/16/2010 1 8:20 AM
Edina HRA, NIN
$9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
(Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002)
Debt Service Comparison
Date Total P +I
Net New D/S
Old Net D/S
Savings
Fiscal Total
11/01/2010 -
(2,381.53)
-
2,381.53
-
02/O1/2011 815,145.00
815,145.00
814,780.63
(364.37)
2,017.16
08/01/2011 68,730.00
68,730.00
200,980.63
132,250.63
-
02/01/2012 868,730.00
868,730.00
830,980.63
(37,749.37)
94,501.26
08/01/2012 66 730.00
66 730.00
185,860.63
119130.63
-
02/01/2013 871,730.00
871,730.00
845,860.63
(25,869.37)
93,261.26
08/01/2013 63,711.25
63,711.25
169,690.63
105,979.38
-
02/01/2014 873,711.25
873,711.25
859,690.63
(14,020.62)
91,958.76
08/01/2014 59,661.25
59,661.25
152,440.63
92,779.38
-
02/O1/2015 879,661.25
879 661.25
877 440.63
(2,220.62)
90,558.76
08/01/2015 54,331.25
54,331.25
134,315.63
79,984.38
-
02/O1/2016 884,331.25
884,331.25
894,315.63
9,984.38
89,968.76
08/01/2016 47,898.75
47,898.75
114,840.63
66,941.88
-
02/01/2017 887,898.75
887,898.75
914,840.63
26,941.88
93,883.76
08/01/2017 40128.75
40128.75
94,340.63
54,211.88
-
02/Ol/2018 895,128.75
895,128.75
934,340.63
39,211.88
93,423.76
08/01/2018 31,578.75
31,578.75
72,815.63
41,236.88
-
02/O1/2019 906,578.75
906,578.75
957,815.63
51,236.88
92,473.76
08/01/2019 21,953.75
21,953.75
50,137.50
28,183.75
-
02/01/2020 916 953.75
916 953.75
980,137.50
__.63,183.75
91,367.50
08/01/2020 11,437.50
_
11,437.50
25,725.00
14,287.50
-
02/01/2021 926,437.50
926,437.50
1,005,725.00
79,287.50
93,575.00
Total $10,192,467.50
$10,190,085.97
$11,117,075.71
$926,989.74
-
PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net)
Gross PV Debt Service Savings
835,758.08
Net PV Cashflow Savings A 1 930 %(Bond Yield) ...
835,758.08
Contingency or Rounding Amount
2,381.53
Net Present Value Benefit
$838,139.61
Net PV Benefit / $10,060,758.08 PV Refunded Debt Service
8.331%
Net PV Benefit / $8,500,000 Refunded Principal
9.860%
Net PV Benefit / $9,225,000 Refunding Principal
9.086%
Refunding Bond Information
Refunding Dated Date
11/01/2010
Refunding Delivery Date
11/01/2010
10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/7812010 1 8:20 AM
Ehlers
Leaders in Public
Edina HRA MN
$9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
(Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002)
Escrow Fund Cashflow
/
Investment Parameters
Investment Model [PV GIC or Securities] Securities
Default investment yield target Bond Yield
Cash Deposit
Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 9,084,818.00
Total Cost of Investments $9,084,818.47
Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $8,917,782.96
Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (167,035.51)
Yield to Receipt 0.3053956%
Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.9299849%
State and Local Govemment Series (SLGS) rates for 9/14/2010
10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 19/1612010 1 8:20 AM
Cash
Date
Principal
Rate
Interest
Receipts
Disbursements
Balance
11/01/2010
-
-
-
0.47
-
0.47
02/01/2011
808,227.00
0.140%
6,553.74
814,780.74
814,780.63
0.58
— 08/0172011
188 - 1'48:00
0:210%
12;832:60
200;980:60
200,980.63
0155
02101'/2012
8,088,443.00
0.310%
12,537.08
8,100,980.08
8;100,980.63
-
Total
$9,084,818.00
-
S31,923.42
$9,116,741.89
$9,116,741.89
-
/
Investment Parameters
Investment Model [PV GIC or Securities] Securities
Default investment yield target Bond Yield
Cash Deposit
Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 9,084,818.00
Total Cost of Investments $9,084,818.47
Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $8,917,782.96
Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (167,035.51)
Yield to Receipt 0.3053956%
Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.9299849%
State and Local Govemment Series (SLGS) rates for 9/14/2010
10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 19/1612010 1 8:20 AM
De:'bt Issuance. Services
September 21, 2010
Pre-Sale'Report for
$275951000, G. O. Bonds, Series 2010B
City of, Edina, Minnesota
EHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
N I
www..ehler8= inO.com
MinripsotA ptioner 651-697-.8500 = 3060 Centre Pointe Drive
Offices also In Wisconsin and Illinois fax .651-697-8555 Rosevilfe,' MN 55113-1122
Debt Issuance Services
—0 E=
Details of Proposed Debt
Proposed Issues: $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010B to be secured by the full faith and
credit of the taxpayers of the City of Edina (the "Bonds ").
Purposes: The first purpose of the bonds is to finance $2,355,000 of street
reconstruction projects associated with Pamela Park Neighborhood,
Braemar Hills Neighborhood, Bror Road, Moccasin Valley, Interlachen.
Circle Neighborhood, Interlachen Bluff Neighborhood, and Parkwood
Knolls Neighborhood. The financing has assumed that 100% of project
costs will be assessed to property owners and 22% of the assessment
amount will be prepaid.
The second purpose of the Bonds is to finance $240,000 in equipment
purchases payable over slightly more than two years.
Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 475,
Chapter 429 and Chapter 412.
Funding Source: The City will use special assessments to pay the street reconstruction
portion of the debt and a tax levy to pay for the equipment:
• The assessments are not expected to be levied until the fall of 2011
for taxes payable in 2012, with $65,000 capitalized interest to
bridge the first debt service payments.
• The taxes payable 2010 levy contained a debt service component
for the equipment portion of the Bonds. Similar levies of $80,000
for taxes payable in 2011 and 2012 will be required for debt
service.
Risk Factors: If assessments are pre -paid in the year 2013 through 2017, the City will
not immediately be able to pre -pay the Bonds. Therefore, there is a risk of
a City subsidy for the street projects because the interest earnings on the
debt service funds may be less than the interest rate on the Bonds. A
higher interest rate on the assessments and a 105% levy requirement helps
mitigate this risk.
Arbitrage Monitoring: The City will need to monitor its debt service funds to insure compliance
with IRS parameters and to avoid penalties for carrying too high of a
balance during the life of the issue.
Rating: The Bonds are anticipated to be rated by Moody's at an "Aaa" level and by
Standard & Poor's at an "AAA" level.
Presale Report
City of Edina 2010 Debt Issues Page 2
Debt Issuance Services
Bank Qualification: Because the City is issuing less than $30 Million in the calendar year, the
City will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations.
Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds.
Term /Call Feature: Interest is payable each six months beginning February 1, 2011. Principal
on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2011 through 2022.
The Bonds will be callable on February 1, 2018 for principal payable in
2019 through 2022.
Other
Considerations: We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's
outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities.
Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule
Pre -Sale Review by Council:
Distribute Official Statement:
Conference with Rating Agencies:
City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds:
Estimated Closing Date:
Attachments
September 21, 2010
October 8, 2010
Week of October 11th, 2010
October 19, 2010
November 23, 2010
Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed Wth Bond Sale
Sources and Uses of Funds
Proposed Debt Service Schedule
Ehlers Contacts:
Financial Advisors: Jon North
(651) 697 -8545
Mark Ruff
(651) 697 -8505
Bond Analysts: Diana Lockard
(651) 697 -8534
Debbie Holmes
(651) 697 -8536
Bond Sale Coordinator: Alicia Aulwes
(651) 697 -8523
The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for
review prior to the sale date.
Presale Report
City of Edina 2010 Debt Issues Page 3
City of Edina, MN
X2.595.000 G.O. Bonds. Series 2010
Issue Summary
Table of Contents
Report
ISSUE SUMMARY
Total Issue Sources And Uses I
Debt Service Schedule 2
Net Debt Service Schedule 3
PIR BONDS
Net Debt Service Schedule 4
EQUIP CERTS
Net Debt Service Schedule 5
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9115/2010 1 8:17 AM
City of Edina, MN
$2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
Issue Summary
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 10/1S12010 1 Delivered 10115/2010
PIR Bonds
Equip Certs
Issue
Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds
$2,355,000.00
$240,000.00
$2,595,000.00
Prepaid Special Assessments
630 250.00
630,250.00
Total Sources
$2,995,250.00
5240,000.00
$3,225,250.00
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000 %)
23,550.00
2,400.00
25,950.00
Costs of Issuance
31 763.01
3,236.99
35,000.00
Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund
65 479.47
-
65,479.47
Deposit to Project Construction Fund
2,866,000.00
230,000.00
3,096,000.00
Rounding Amount
(1,542.48)
4,363.01
2,820.53
Total Uses
$2,985,250.00
$240,000.00
$3,2259250.00
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9/152010 8:17 AM
Leaders Ehlers
M1 -
City of Edina, MN
$2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
Issue Summary
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total
10/15/2010
-
-
-
-
02/01/2011
80,000.00
0.700%
15,530.47
95,530.47
95,530.47
08/01/2011
-
-
26,092.50
26,092.50
-
02/01/2012
80,000.00
0.950%
26,092.50
106,092.50
132,185.00
08/01/2012
25 712.50
25 712.50
-
02/01/2013
300,000.00
1.050010
25,712.50
325,712.50
351,425.00
08/01/2013
-
-
24,137.50
24,137.50
-
02/01/2014
220,000.00
1.300%
24,137.50
244,137.50
268,275.00
08/01/2014
-
-
22,707.50
22,707.50
-
02/01/2015
225,000.00
1.600%
22 707.50
247,707.50
270,415.00
08/01/2015
-
-
20,907.50
20,907.50
-
02/01/2016
225,000.00
1.850%
20,907.50
245,907.50
266,815.00
08/01/2016
-
-
18,826.25
18,826.25
-
02/01/2017
230,000.00
2.1500/6
18,826.25
248,826.25
267,652.50
08/01/2017
-
16 353.75
16 353.75
-
02/01/2018
235,000.00
2.300%
16,353.75
251,353.75
267,707.50
08/01/2018
-
-
13,651.25
13,651.25
-
02/01/2019
240,000.00
2.500%
13,651.25
253,651.25
267,302.50
08/01/2019
-
-
10,651.25
10,651.25
-
02/01/2020
245,000.00
2.650%
10 651.25
2.55 651.25
266,302.50
08/01/2020
-
-
7,405.00
7,405.00
-
02/01/2021
255,000.00
2.800%
7,405.00
262,405.00
269,810.00
08/01/2021
-
-
3,835.00
3,835.00
-
02/01/2022
260,000.00
2.950%
3,835.00
263,835.00
267,670.00
Total $2,595,000.00 - $396,090.47 $2,991,090.47 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $16,689.08
Average Life 6.431 Years
Average Coupon 2.3733507%
Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.5288415%
True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.5283242%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.3568306%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 2.7634511%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 2.3733507%
Weighted Average Maturity 6.431 Years
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary I 9/152010 1 8:17 AM
City of Edina, MN
$2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010
Issue Summary
Net Debt Service Schedule
Total $2,595,000.00 - $396,090.47 $2,991,090.47 (65,479.47) $2,925,611.00 -
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM
Fiscal
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
CIF
Net New D/S
Total
10/15/2010
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
02/01/2011
80,000.00
0.700%
15,530.47
95,530.47
(14,894.47)
80,636.00
80,636.00
08101/2011
-
-
26,092.50
26,092.50
(25,292.50)
800.00
-
02/01/2012
80,000.00
0.950%
26,092.50
106,092.50
(25,292.50)
80,800.00
81,600.00
08/01/2012
25,712.50
25,712.50
25,712.50
-
02/01/2013
300,000.00
1.050%
25,712.50
325,712.50
325,712.50
351,425.00
08/01/2013
-
-
24,137.50
24,137.50
24,137.50
-
02/01/2014
220,000.00
1.300%
24,137.50
244,137.50
-
244,137.50
268,275.00
08/01/2014
-
-
22,707.50
22,707.50
-
22,707.50
-
02/01/2015
225 000.00
1.600%
22 707.50
247 707.50
247 707.50
270 415.00
08/01/2015
-
-
20,907.50
20,907.50
20,907.50
-
02/01/2016
225,000.00
1.850%
20,907.50
245,907.50
-
245,907.50
266,815.00
08/01/2016
-
-
18,826.25
18,826.25
18,826.25
-
02/01/2017
230,000.00
2.150%
18,826.25
248,826.25
248,826.25
267,652.50
08/01/2017
16,353.75
16,353.75
16,353.75
-
02/01/2018
235,000.00
2.300%
16,353.75
251,353.75
251,353.75
267,707.50
08/01/2018
-
-
13,651.25
13,651.25
13,651.25
-
02/01/2019
240,000.00
2.500%
13,651.25
253,651.25
253,651.25
267,302.50
08/01/2019
-
-
10,651.25
10,651.25
-
10,651.25
-
02/01/2020
245 000.00
2.650%
10 651.25
255 651.25
255 651.25
266 302.50
08/01/2020
-
-
7,405.00
7,405.00
-
7,405.00
-
02/01/2021
255,000.00
2.800%
7,405.00
262,405.00
-
262,405.00
269,810.00
08/01/2021
-
-
3,835.00
3,835.00
-
3,835.00
-
02/01/2022
260,000.00
2.950%
3,835.00
263,835.00
-
263,835.00
267,670.00
Total $2,595,000.00 - $396,090.47 $2,991,090.47 (65,479.47) $2,925,611.00 -
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM
Edina HRA, MN
$2,355,000 - Purpose One
G.O. PIR Bonds
Net Debt Service Schedule
Fiscal
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I CIF Net New D/S Total
10/15/2010
4 -
-
-
-
-
-
02/01/2011
14,894.47
14,894.47
(14,894.47)
-
-
- 08/01/2011
-
-
25,292.50
25;292:50
(25;292:50)
-
--
02/01/2012
-
-
25,292.50 M-
25,292.50
(25,292.50)
-
-
08/01/2012
25.292 50
25 292.50
-
25,292.50
-
02/01/2013
220,000.00
1.050%
25,292.50
245,292.50
-
245,292.50
270,585.00
08101/2013
-
-
24,137.50
24,137.50
-
24;137.50
-
02/01/2014
220,000.00
1.300%
24,137.50
244,137.50
-
244,137.50
268,275.00
08/01/2014
-
-
22,707.50
22,707.50
-
22,707.50
-
02/01 /2015
225,000.00
1.600%
22,70750
247 707.50
-
247,707.50
270,415.00
08/01/2015
-
-
20,907.50
20,907.50
-
20,907.50
-
02/01/2016
225,000.00
1.850%
20,907.50
245,907.50
-
245,907.50
266,815.00
08/01/2016
-
-
18,826.25
18,826.25
-
18,826.25
-
02/01/2017
230,000.00
2.150%
18,826.25
248,826.25
-
248,826.25
267,652.50
08/01/2017
16 353.75
16 353.75
-
16,353.75
-
02/01/2018
235,000.00
2.300%
16,353.75
251,353.75
-
251,353.75
267,707.50
08/01/2018
-
-
13,651.25
13,651.25
-
13,651.25
-
02/01/2019
240,000.00
2.500%
13,651.25
253,651.25
-
253,651.25
267,302.50
08/01/2019
-
-
10,651.25
10,651.25
-
10,651.25
-
02/01/2020
245,000.00
2.6506/.
10,651.25
255,651.25
-
255,651.25
••• 266,302.50_
08/01/2020
-
-
7,405.00
7,405.00
-
7,405.00
-
02/01/2021
255,000.00
2.800%
7,405.00
262,405.00
-
262,405.00
269,810.00
08101/2021
-
-
3,835.00
3,835.00
-
3,835.00
-
02/01/2022
260,000.00
2.950%
3,835.00
263,835.00
-
263,835.00
267,670.00
Total $2,355,000.00 - $393,014.47 52,748,014.47 (65,479.47) $2,682,535.00 -
Ser 2010 Go Bonds Issue S I PIR Bonds 1 9/15(2010 1 8:17 AM
Edina HRA, MN
$240,000 - Purpose Two
G.O. Equipment Certificates
Net Debt Service Schedule
Total $240,000.00 - S3,076.00 $243,076.00 $243,076.00 -
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Equip Certs 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM
Net New
Fiscal
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
D/S
Total
10/15/2010
-
-
-
-
-
02/01/2011
80,000.00
0.700%
636.00
80,636.00
80,636.00
80,636.00
08/01/2011
-
-
800.00
800.00
800.00
-
02/01/2012
80,000.00
0.950%
800.00
80,800.00
80,800.00
81,600.00
08/01/2012
420.00
420.00
420.00
-
02/01/2013
80,000.00
1.050%
420.00
80,420.00
80,420.00
80,840.00
Total $240,000.00 - S3,076.00 $243,076.00 $243,076.00 -
Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Equip Certs 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM
/1N,r
o
\NOORPOPA9 •
Moa
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item. Item No. IV. B.
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
1'7 Action
F-1 Discussion
Information
Date: September 21, 2010
Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -77 Accepting Various Donations
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution.
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND:
In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a
resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have
prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient
departments for your consideration.
ATTACHMENT:
Resolution No. 2010 -77
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-77
ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA
City of Edina
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or
personal property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two
thirds majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere
appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens.
Edina Art Center:
Don & Gini Washburn $100.00
Heath Randall King $100.00
Mark & Ruth Valgamae $100.00
Edina Communications Department:
Edina Community Foundation $143.33
Edina Police Department:
Matt Backmeier State Farm $900.00
Dated: September 21, 2010
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
Jennifer Bennerotte $10.00
Sandra Phillips $50.00
Jean Schlemmer $100.00
DVD Recorder
Traffic Safety T -shirts
James B. Hovland, Mayor
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2010,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this
day of
City Clerk
City Hall 952- 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
o e
0
. ,� 0
,aaa
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
IV. C.
From:
Roger N. Knutson
City Attorney
® Action
Discussion
Information
Date: September 21, 2010
Subject:
Resolution Designating City Manager on an Interim Basis
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -80.
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND:
Heather Worthington's last day as Interim City Manager is October 6, 2010. Because the new
City Manager, Scott Neal will not begin his employment until November 8, 2010, an interim City
Manager should be designated. Only the City Manager is authorized by law to perform certain
tasks and sign certain documents. The appointment will avoid any uncertainty about the
authority of an Interim City Manager when the City Manager's position is vacant.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 2010 -80
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-80
RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY MANAGER
ON AN INTERIM BASIS
RECITALS
City of Edina
A. The interim City Manager, Heather Worthington, has submitted her resignation
effective October 6, 2010.
B. The City has appointed Scott Neal as City Manager effective November
8, 2010
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA:
1. Effective October 6, 2010 Ceil Smith is appointed City Manager on an interim
basis until November 8, 2010.
2. This appointment shall carry with it the duties and responsibilities associated
with the office of City Manager, and Ceil Smith shall be listed as a signatory on all city accounts.
Attest:
ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 21st day of September 2010.
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
I, the undersigned duly appointed acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of
the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September
21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010.
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
City Hall 952- 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
cif
w9S-OA,
oe
H
,aas
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
Item No: IV.D
From:
Boyd Tate „-
Traffic Safety Coordinat r
® Action
F] Discussion
Information
Date: September 21, 2010
Subject:
Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2010
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, September 1,
2010.
BACKGROUND:
Staff will be presenting Section Al and B2, all other items could be passed in one
motion.
ATTACHMENTS:
Traffic Safety Review for September 1, 2010.
It
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on September 1, 2010. Staff present
included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety
Coordinator and Sign Coordinator.
From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed
with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or
have additional facts to present, they can be included on the September 21, 2010, Council
Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which staff recommends approval of request:
1. The Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy has been revised to bring the City's
Policy in concurrence with the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MN MUTCD). The updated policy is attached to this report.
The only significant changes to the policy have occurred in item 4.C.1 and
4.D. In 4.C.1 the minimum total vehicle volume has been reduced from 500
vehicles per hour to 300 vehicles per hour. Item 4.1) has been added as
additional criteria.
2. Request to put "No Parking Anytime" signs at the end of the cul -de -sac
located at Benton Avenue and Stuart Avenue. This request comes from staff.
The roadway in question is located on the north west side of Country Side
Elementary School and is currently marked "No Parking — Fire Lane ". Staff
wants to post "No Parking" signs to prevent employees and visitors of the
school from parking here. The area posted would be deep within the cul -de-
sac so residents could continue to park on the street.
Staff recommends approval of the request to post the Benton
Avenue /Stuart Avenue cul -de -sac "No ParkinE ".
Traffic Safety Staff Review
September 1, 2010
Page 1 of 4
3. Request to change all of the "90- minute" parking signs to "2- hour" parking in
all three of the parking ramps at 50`h & France Ave.
This request comes from the 50`h & France Business & Professional
Association who want to give customers more time to park while using the
businesses in this area. The association feels that 2 -Hour parking would allow
customers to dine or see a movie and not be in violation of the current
restrictions. The City of Edina would be reimbursed by the association for
time and materials.
the reauest to chanize the
restrictions in all three ramps at 50`" & France Avenue from "90-
Minutes" to "2- Hour" parking.
SECTION B:
Requests on which staff recommends denial of request:
Request to put a "Yield" sign at 74`h Street (south le at at Xerxes Avenue for
east bound 74`h Street traffic, and a "Stop" sign at 75`. Street for south bound
Xerxes Avenue traffic. Both locations are on the Edina side of Xerxes
Avenue. This request comes from the City of Richfield.
(See attached map).
The City of Richfield has adopted a new residential stop sign policy and is
making this request to bring this section of Xerxes Avenue into compliance
with that policy.
This section of Xerxes Avenue has a Monday- Friday average daily traffic
count of 167 vehicles with an 85`"- percentile speed of 31.9 mph. This is far
below the minimum vehicles required by warrants. Staff recommends that we
stay within our written guidelines in order to maintain a fair and consistent
application of this policy.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for a Yield sign at 74`h Street.
and a Stop sign at 75`h Street on Xerxes Avenue for lack of warrants.
2. Request for an "All Way Stop at W. 58`h Street and Xerxes Avenue. This
request was first reviewed by staff at the May 5, 2010 meeting and brought to
Council on May 18, 2010. Since that time Staff has completed additional
review at the request of the Council.
Please see the attached Engineering Department Memo dated September 17,
2010 for the full report and recommendation.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 4
September 1, 2010
SECTION C:
Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
1. Request to change the location of the "No Left Turn 3:10 — 3:40 PM School
Days" sign for west bound Valley View Road traffic at Chapel Lane (adjacent
to Edina High School) to make it more visible to motorists.
Refer to Engineering Department.
SECTION D:
Other traffic safety issues handled from July 20, 2010 to August 15, 2010.
1. A total of fifty -one calls were received from residents with questions regarding
various traffic safety issues. Many of the questions were related to the start of
school.
2. A resident of Cornelia Place called to complain that ambulances and Metro
Mobility vehicles were parking in the no parking zone of the new medical
building on W. 65th Street between France Ave and Valley View Road.
The no parking signs were taken down during the construction of this building.
They are now back up and the area is clearly posted.
3. Request that the in -street pedestrian sign located on W. 66d' Street and West
Shore Drive be left up all year and not just during summer months.
4. Angry resident wanted to know why we lowered the speed limit on W. 66th Street
between Valley View Road and Highway 100. He felt the limit should have been
increased to 40 mph. This was a very lengthy phone call.
5. A resident called and was very upset because she got a ticket for making a right
turn on red during the restricted hours at 50`" Street and Grange Road. She
wanted to know when this turn restriction was first put up. Research showed that
the "No Right Turn on Red" was posted on September 10, 1985.
6. Two calls from realtors wanting to know traffic counts in the Morningside and
Country club neighborhoods.
7. Complaint from resident on Woodland Circle about construction parking and
noise.
8. Call from a resident on the Edina side of Xerxes Avenue who was opposed to the
Richfield request that we place a stop sign at 75th Street for south bound Xerxes
Ave traffic.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 4
September 1, 2010
9. Clear view complaint on Blake Road and the south leg of Interlachen Boulevard.
Ref. to Sgt. P. Larsen.
10. Complaint that the stop signs at 70th & Cahill Road and 70th & Tracy Avenue
were partially blocked by tree limbs. Ref. to Sgt. P. Larsen.
11. Call from a resident of Edina West Condos (Lincoln Drive) wanting to know why
the City of Edina put speed bumps on their street. This is a private drive and the
speed bumps were put in by the condo association.
12. Complaint about all of the extra traffic generated by the new medical building on
W. 65th Street (France Avenue to Valley View Road). This is from a resident of
Cornelia Place who is upset that people are driving through their front lot
13. Complaint about the street condition of Prescott Circle. Ref. to Street
Department. Pot holes were filled in.
14. Call from a resident who stated cars were ignoring the stop sign on Maloney
Avenue at Arthur Street. Ref. to EPD.
15. Two residents on Country Club Road called to complain that cars were parking to
close the alley. This will be discussed at the next traffic safety meeting.
16. Received a call from an employee at the office building at 8000 West 78th Street
stating it is nearly impossible to make a left turn from the parking lot onto West
78th Street during peak afternoon hours. This is a Bloomington address and the
caller was referred to the City of Bloomington.
17. Call from a resident near Cornelia School stating that Edina needs more stop signs
in all residential areas.
18. Complaint from a resident stating that the entrance to Southdale Mall off of
France Avenue should be better marked. Ref. to Hennepin County.
19. Call from a resident on Ivy Way stating someone had taken down the street name
sign. Ref. to sign shop.
ATTACHMENTS
• Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy
• Engineering Department Memo dated September 17, 2010 for 58th Street and
Chowen Avenue
• Proposed Signage at Xerxes Avenue and 74th/75th Street
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 4
September 1, 2010
e MULTIWAY STOP SIGNS STOP
N�� .�y TRAFFIC POLICY
Apo
Revised September 1, 2010 City of Edina
PURPOSE: The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform
treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs.
Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly
warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where
they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and
negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless
noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and
resident within the City.
PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff
member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather
the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution.
Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and
the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to
the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review
recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the
recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that
are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested
issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and
present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to
attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final
authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or-
similar request is at the discretion of the City Council.
POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed.
2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight
obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the
installation of a stop sign.
3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for
a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will
remain unchanged.
G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure\Streets\Trafflc\policies\jnulti way stop.docx
MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY (CONTINUED)
4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign
installation:
a. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop
is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation
of the traffic control signal.
b. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes
in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and
left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions.
C. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the
major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours
of an average day, and
2. The combined. vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume
entering the intersection from the minor street
approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least
200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average
delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30
seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but
3. If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major street
traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the above values.
d. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B,
C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum
values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control
speed.
6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to
control volume.
G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \policies\multi way stop.docx
o @
o
V .ay
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDINA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date: September 17, 2010
TO: Traffic Safety Committee
FROM: Jack Sullivan 9 JP
SUBJECT: 58th Street and Chowen Avenue - Traffic Report
PURPOSE:
To review the regulatory and cautionary signage of 58t" Street east of France Avenue
for concurrence with current City Traffic Policies as directed by the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
Two residents of Chowen Avenue requested an all -way stop intersection at 581h Street
and Chowen Avenue. The residents became concerned when an off leash dog was hit
at the intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue. They are also concerned with
the .safety of children in the neighborhood as well as the speed of the traffic on 58th
Street.
The request was-forwarded to the Traffic Advisory Committee (TSC) for review at the
May 5, 2010 meeting. The TSC denied the request for a stop sign because the
intersection does not meet the criteria of the City's. Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy
(Attachment A). The TSC report was brought to Council on May 18, 2010. Council
directed staff to review the regulatory and cautionary signage of 58th Street east of
France Avenue (Attachment B).
PROCEDURE:
Analyze the traffic volume and speeds of 58th Street east of France Avenue for
consideration of traffic control signage.
The criteria outlined in the City of Edina Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy (Attachment
H), updated to reflect 2005 Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN
MUTCD), was used to determine if the intersection warrants multiway traffic control.
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 1 of 12
r
STAFF SUMMARY:
Engineering and Public Safety Staff do not believe there is a speed or traffic safety
issue along 58th Street and the following supporting data illustrates that the intersection
at 58th Street and Chowen Avenue does not warrant a Multiway Stop Sign per the City
of Edina Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy and the MN MUTCD.
Staff cannot support modifications to the traffic control at this intersection and is
recommending denial of the multiway stop sign request.
DATA COLLECTION:
Data collection for this area included roadway geometrics, speed, volume, accident
records and sight obstructions.
Road Geometrics and Signage
58th Street is a designated Municipal State Aid (MSAS) street with a posted speed limit
of 30 mph. The road has no horizontal curvature and gentle vertical curves along the
corridor. The road is paved with a blacktop surface and is approximately 29 feet wide
with no curb and gutter. Parking is allowed on both sides and it is striped with, a single
skip yellow centerline marking. The paint striping on 58th Street changes to a double
yellow 120 feet either side of Beard Avenue.
The intersecting streets of Ewing Avenue, Drew Avenue, Chowen Avenue, Beard
Avenue, Abbott Avenue, Zenith Avenue, and York. Avenue are approximately 30 feet
wide with on street parking. The side streets are posted as 30 mph and are controlled
with side street stop sign with the exception of .Beard Avenue. Beard Avenue is the only
all -way stop intersection along the corridor.
There is no recorded rationale or revisions to the street signage of 58th Street since the
roadway was constructed in the late 1940's. It is assumed that the all -way stop at 58th
Street and Beard Avenue was placed due to Beard Avenue being the half -way point
between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and is located at the bottom of a hill.
Similarly 60 Street has the only all -way stop located at Chowen Avenue, at a similar
low point of the roadway.
There. are no sidewalks located along any of the streets, however a state aid funded
sidewalk is proposed in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update for 58th Street
(Attachment C).
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 2 of 12
U
Chowen Park is located approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of 58th Street
and Chowen Avenue. The park is situated in the southwest corner of 57th Street and
Chowen Avenue at an all —way stop intersection.
Speed and Volumes
Eight traffic counters were placed near the intersection of 58th and Chowen Avenue.
The counters were placed around midday Tuesday, May 25, 2010 and picked up on
Friday, June 4, 2010. The counters were in place for nine full days and two half days.
The counters record the number of vehicles, type of vehicle, bicycles, speed, direction
and time of day. Average traffic volumes and speeds are shown on the Traffic Counter
Location (Attachment D)
The Memorial Day weekend was included in the data collection, however only Tuesday,
June 1, 2010 to Thursday, June 3, 2010 was used for average daily traffic counts. 58th
Street has an average of 1,905 vehicles near Chowen Avenue. Beard Avenue and
Chowen Avenue have approximately 300 vehicles per day per roadway.
Speed data and the 85 percentile speed were taken as an average of the eleven days.
The 85 percentile speed is the speed at which 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling.
The 85 percentile speed for 58th Street is between 30 and 32 mph, the speed for Beard
Avenue is between 27 and 29 mph and Chowen Avenue is between 25 to 29 mph.
Bicycle counts were also obtained as part of the traffic data collection by using the same
traffic counters. Bicycle volumes on 58th Street averaged 0.5 bicycles per day, 2
bicycles per day on Beard Avenue and 2 bicycles per day on Chowen Avenue.
Pedestrian volumes were not counted as part of this study. Counts of this type are
extremely labor intensive, requiring human field observation for long periods of time. In
addition, the_, volatility of weather and other factors greatly affect the pedestrian
movements in a non - commercial area such as this.
Accident History
Accident data from 2001 to 2008 was derived from the State of Minnesota Department
of Transportation crash history database. As shown in Figure No. 1 there has been no
reported incidents of vehicle or property damage crashes along 58th Street from France
Avenue to Xerxes Avenue.
Accident data from 2008 to the present was supplied by the. City of Edina Police
Department. From January 2009 to June 30, 2010, there have been 50 police
responses associated with this corridor exclusive of the France Avenue and the Xerxes
Avenue intersections. Only one call was related to a property damage crash, all others
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen\ 58th_Chowen_Traffic_Re port. docx
Page 3 of 12
n
were not traffic related. The property damage crash was on April 7, 2010, when an off
leash dog was struck and killed by a drive -off motorist on 58th Street at the intersection
of Chowen Avenue.
Figure No. 1 - Traffic History on 58t.' and 60th Street: 2001 to 2008
Sight Obstructions
58th Street has no horizontal curvature with most of the trees and other landscape
vegetation set back off the road; therefore, no horizontal sight obstruction issue exist
and is compliant with City Code 1405 "Clear View Zone ". The vertical profile of the road
can be seen in the attached profile graphic (Attachment E).
The' intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located near the crest (top) of a
vertical .curve; however, the area affords sufficient sight distances such that no sight
obstructions exist. The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located at the
bottom of a sag (bottom) vertical curve which has no sight distance issues.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.doac
Page 4 of 12
1
i
�t
W eem
Grimes W
u
e
¢
a
m
w
3
W 59th St
II
O
¢
Y
N
a
W 60th St
t
Figure No. 1 - Traffic History on 58t.' and 60th Street: 2001 to 2008
Sight Obstructions
58th Street has no horizontal curvature with most of the trees and other landscape
vegetation set back off the road; therefore, no horizontal sight obstruction issue exist
and is compliant with City Code 1405 "Clear View Zone ". The vertical profile of the road
can be seen in the attached profile graphic (Attachment E).
The' intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located near the crest (top) of a
vertical .curve; however, the area affords sufficient sight distances such that no sight
obstructions exist. The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located at the
bottom of a sag (bottom) vertical curve which has no sight distance issues.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.doac
Page 4 of 12
1
Police Speed Trailer
The police department's speed radar trailer has been on -site during the months of April
and May to give drivers instantaneous speed feedback.
COMPARISON OF MULTIWAY STOP SIGN CRITERIA TO DATA COLLECTED:
The data collected and evaluated in the above sections of this report is compared
against the City's Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy for the intersection of 58th Street and
Chowen Avenue.
The Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy, in underlined italics, is followed by Staff's
engineering evaluation.
MULTIWAY STOP SIGN TRAFFIC POLICY:
1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed
The language of the City of Edina Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy
conforms to the MN MUTCD, 2005 edition.
2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions
shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign.
Refer to the "Data Collection" section above for an overview of
criteria reviewed.
3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a
multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will remain
unchanged.
Engineering data does not clearly indicate the need for a multiway
stop sign at this intersection.
4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign
installation:
a. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an
interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while
arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic
control signal.
The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue does not meet
the 8 signal warrants as outlined in Chapter 4C of the MN MUTCD;
therefore this intersection does not meet this requirement.
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 5 of 12
b. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a
12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way
stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left -tum collisions
as well as right -angle collisions.
There has only been one reported accident at this intersection
since 2001. This accident was between a vehicle and an
unleashed dog. Therefore, there is not a crash problem at this
intersection and does not meet crash requirements.
c. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the
major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages
at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average
day, and
In order to determine the volume of vehicles entering the
intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue traffic count data
was looked at to determine the largest volume day and location.
The largest volume day was June 3, 2010 for this intersection
(Figure No. 1) on the next page.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen\ 58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 6 of 12
58th Street and Chowen Avenue
8 Hour Average (June 3, 2010 Data Set)
58th Street (Major Street)
Chowen Avenue (Minor Street)
West
Bound'
East Bound'
Vehicle
Volume
South
Bound
North
Bound
Vehicle
Volume
12:00 AM
4
2
6
0
1
1
1:00 AM
3
4
7
0
0
0
2:00 AM
0
1
1
0
0
0
3:00 AM
0
0
0
0
1
1
4:00 AM
0
2
2
0
1
1
5:00 AM
1
6
7
0
2
2
6:00 AM
9
23
32
2
6
8
*7:00 AM
63
103
166
28
13
41
*8:00 AM
66
99
165
14
10
24
9:00 AM
53
47
100
7
9
16
10:00 AM
48
26
74
6
6
12
11:00 AM
64
37
101
5
15
20
*12:00 PM
68
42
110
8
9
17
1:00 PM
60
34
94
6
10
16
2:00 PM
52
47
99
12
19
31
*3:00 PM
122
61
183
16
21
37
*4:00 PM
146
69
215
12
18
30
*5:00 PM
160
80
240
12
13
25
*6:00 PM
94
74
168
9
10
19
*7:00 PM
71
33
104
3
5
8
8:00 PM
66
30
96
6
5
11
9:00 PM
31
18
49
3
4
7
10:00 PM
16
8
24
2
1
3
11:00 PM
8
5
1 13
0
01
0
Total
Volume: 1205 851 2056 151 179 330
* 8 Hour Average (June 3, 2010 Data Set): 168.9 25.1
1 Traffic Counts for West Bound and East Bound used Station B
2 Traffic Counts for South Bound used Station C
3 Traffic Counts for North Bound used Station D
Figure No. 2 — 8 Hour Traffic Volume at 580 St. and Chowen Ave.
As shown in the above figure, the major street (58th Street)
combined approaches average around 169 vehicles per hour for
any eight hours, well below the 300 required. Therefore, the
intersection does not meet the major street volume requirements.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 7 of 12
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume
entering the intersection: from the minor street approaches
(total of both approaches) averages at least 200. units per
hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor -
street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle
during the highest hour, but
The minor street (Chowen Avenue) averages around 25 vehicles
per hour the same eight hours. As previously indicated, there are
only 2 bicycles per day at this location and pedestrians were not
counted. It can be assumed that there are not 173 pedestrians
crossing at . this location per hour for the same eight hours.
Therefore, this intersection does not meet the combined vehicle
requirements.
3. If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major street
traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the above values.
The 85th- percentile speed for the major street (58th Street) is 30
mph. Therefore, the intersection does not meet the speed
requirements.
d. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria 8, C.1,
and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values.
Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Criteria B — 5 Crashes in a 12 month period: Since there is only one
crash along the corridor in the last 9 years; therefore, the 80
percent reduction criteria is not met.
Criteria C.1 — Total vehicles on major streets: 80% of 300 vehicles
per day is 240. The. average at this location is only 169 vehicles
per hour; therefore, the total vehicle requirement is not met.
Criteria C.2. — Combined vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles on
minor street: 80% of 200 is 160.. The average daily vehicle traffic
at this location is only 25 per hour and bicycle and pedestrian
counts are extremely low.
Therefore, the intersection does not meet the combined criteria.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 8 of 12
5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control
speed.
Speeds on both 58th Street (30.0 mph) and Chowen Avenue
(25.7mph) are both within the posted speed limit of 30 mph.
6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control
volume.
Traffic volumes for 58th Street are approximately 1,905 vehicles per
day and volumes on Chowen are approximately 300 vehicles per
day. The recorded volumes are consistent with other similar streets
within Edina.
The intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue was also evaluated and can be
found in Table No. 1 and the "8 Hour Average" data set (Attachment G)
Table No. 1 — Multiway Stop Sian Criteria Matrix
The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen and the intersection of 58th Street and
Beard Avenue do not meet the criteria set forth in the Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy.
However, staff believes that the existing location of the all way stop should remain at the
intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 9 of 12
Edina Multiway
58th Street and Beard
58th Street and Chowen
Stop Sign and MN
Avenue Intersection
Avenue Intersection
Data
Yes /No
Data
Yes /No
Criteria
MUTCD Criteria
4a.
Are signals
If signals are
warranted?
warranted then
N/A
No
N/A
No
install temp. signs
4b.
Crash Problem
5-or more crashes in
no
1 crash in
a 12 -month period
crashes in
No
No
g years
9 years
4c.1.
Minimum Traffic
300 vehicles on
77
No
169
No
Volumes
major leg in 8 hours
4c.2.
Combined
200 vehicles, peds
vehicular /pedestrian
and bikes on minor
27
No
27
No
street
4c.3.
85% approaching
85% speed exceeds
31.2 mph
No
30 mph
No
speed
40 mph
4d.
80% of minimum
80% rule of 4b, 4c.1
see data
see data
values
and 4c.d
above
No
.
above
No
Table No. 1 — Multiway Stop Sian Criteria Matrix
The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen and the intersection of 58th Street and
Beard Avenue do not meet the criteria set forth in the Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy.
However, staff believes that the existing location of the all way stop should remain at the
intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue.
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 9 of 12
OTHER TRAFFIC MANANGEMENT OPTIONS:
Pedestrian Crossinas
The intersection of 58th and Chowen and 58th and Beard do not meet the criteria of the
Pedestrian Crosswalks Traffic Policy (Attachment 1). The pedestrian count would have
to be 20 per hour for two hours in order to meet the policy. Due to the geometrics of the
neighborhood staff believes that the number of pedestrians do not exist. Additionally,
by State Statute 169.21 subd.2, a driver of a motor vehicle must yield the right of way to
a pedestrian crossing the roadway regardless if a crosswalk is marked.
Staff also looked at other traffic control devices at the request of residents. A request
was made for an overhead pedestrian signal commonly referred to as the "HAWK"
(Figure No. 3). These devices act more like a traffic signal than a pedestrian flashing
crossing. The cost for installation of such a system starts at $100,000. More
importantly, the warrants required for installation are just as restrictive as a traditional
traffic signal. By inspection, this intersection would not meet the required warrants.
Fiaure No. 3 — HAWK Pedestrian Crossin
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 10 of 12
Sidewalks
The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 58th Street is just over 1,900 vehicles per day.
Engineering staff recommends separating pedestrians and vehicles whenever traffic
exceeds 750 vehicles per day. Based on the ADT of 58th Street Staff believes
sidewalks are necessary. 58th Street is tentatively scheduled for reconstruction in 2014.
Bike Lanes
58th Street is shown as a primary bike route in the City of Edina Compressive Bicycle
Transportation Plan and the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (Attachment 1). It is
possible to install bike lanes in both directions along 58th Street from France Avenue to
Xerxes Avenue if parking is removed from the street. The cross section of the road
would be a 3.5' bike lane, two 11 foot drive lanes and 3.5' bike lane. The designated
bike lanes would allow the City to reduce the speed limit to 25 mph per state statute.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending denial of the Multiway Stop Sign request at the
intersection of 58th Street and Chowen as it does not meet the criteria of the City
of Edina Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy and that all other regulatory and
cautionary signage remain as -is along 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes
Avenue.
However, Staff recommends a short term solution of striping bike lanes along 58th
Street. This solution would remove parking along 58th Street, narrow up the
traffic lanes and reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians. Staff does not
recommend painted or signed crosswalks since the street does not meet the
criteria of the Pedestrian Crosswalks Traffic Policy.
A longer term solution when 58th street is scheduled for reconstruction is to add
curb and gutter and sidewalk to one side of the roadway. The bike lanes, 25 mph
speed limit and no parking from the short term solution would remain.
If Council adopts the short term solution, staff will return with resolutions for no
parking along 58th Street and signage of the 25 mph speed limit.
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies \58th_Chowen \58th_Chowen Traffic_Report.docx
Page 11 of 12
Attachments:
Attachment A — Traffic Safety Staff Review (May 5, 2010)
Attachment B — Edina City Council Meeting Minutes (May 18, 2010)
Attachment C — 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk Facilities Fig. 7.10
Attachment D - Traffic Counter Location Map
Attachment E — Intersection Control of 58th & 60th Street with profile information
Attachment F — 8 hour Traffic Volumes at 58th Street and Beard Avenue
Attachment G — Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy
Attachment H — Pedestrian Crosswalk Traffic Policy
Attachment I - 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Bicycle Facilities Fig. 7.11
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx
Page 12 of 12
ATTACHMENT A
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 5, 2010. Staff present
included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety
Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor.
From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed
with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or
have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 18, 2010, Council
Agenda.
SECTION A•
Requests on which staff recommends approval of request:
Request for three parking stalls to be designated as "15- minute Loading /
Unloading" in the middle ramp located at 3925 West 49%2 Street at 50th &
France.
The 50`h & France Business Association is requesting that three "15-
minute Loading / Unloading" stalls be installed in the middle ramp 3925
West 49%2 Street, for use by customers and employees at the 50th and
France Business Area. There are currently two parking stalls designated
as "15- minute parking" at the easterly end of the first level of this ramp.
These two signs would be converted to "15- minute Loading / Unloading —
Employee Permit Allowed." A third sign would be installed next to the
middle first level stairway, which will give direct access to most of the
stores and also will create more room for pedestrians during most of the
day. Signs entering the ramp would be changed to read "Employee
Parking Allowed in Designated Spaces Only."
Staff recommends that three parking stalls to be designated as "15-
minute Loading / Unloading" in the middle ramp located at 3925
West 49% Street at 50th & France.
Traffic Safety Staff Review
May 5, 2010
Page 1 of 6
G:\Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 05- 05- 10.doc
ATTACHMENT A
2. Request from a resident to put up advisory signs urging pedestrians to
cross the street only in the designated crosswalks provided along West
49'/2 Street between France Avenue and West 50th Street.
SECTION B:
This request comes from a citizen who almost hit a pedestrian in this area.
He stated that the pedestrian was not in a designated crosswalk and
stepped right in front of his vehicle. Edina's pedestrian crosswalk traffic
policy states that "Pedestrians must obey signals and yield to motorists if
not crossing at an intersection or a crosswalk."
West 49%2 Street, west of France Avenue, turns into Halifax Avenue just
north of West 50th Street. There are currently five (5), designated
pedestrian crosswalks on this short roadway. Three of these crosswalks
are mid -block and two of the five have in- street pedestrian crossing signs.
This area has high pedestrian volumes at all times of the day.
Avenue, north of West 50th Street, has an average daily
tI�
Halifax traffic
count of 7,429 vehicles with an 85 - percentile speed of 21.9 mph. There
have been several vehicle accidents reported in the past five years but no
pedestrian accidents. The requestor feels that it is just a matter of time
before a pedestrian gets hit.
Staff feels that pedestrian advisory signs would increase public safety and
awareness if placed at the ramp exits as well as the entrances and exits of
area businesses. These advisory signs would advise /urge all pedestrians to
use the crosswalks provided and be worded accordingly.
Staff recommends the installation of pedestrian advisory signs along
West-491/7 Street west of France Avenue and on Halifax Avenue north
of West 50 "' Street at the entrances /exit;
as at various other locations in the area.
Requests on which staff recommends denial of request:
Request for a stop sign on Lexington Street at Concord Avenue that would
stop east/west bound Lexington Street traffic.
The requestor is a resident on Concord Avenue who is concerned with the
safety of the children on the block. Requestor states that cars frequently
speed around the corner of Lexington Street onto Concord Avenue and
believes that a stop sign would solve this problem.
Traffic Safety Staff Review
May 5, 2010
Page 2 of 6
G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 05- 05- 10.doc
ATTACHMENT A
Concord Avenue is -a 29 -foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or
sidewalks. A 2007 traffic study shows the average daily traffic count to be
1,315 vehicles with an 85h-percentile speed of 22.0 mph. Lexington
Street is a 26 -foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. A
2008 traffic study shows an average daily traffic count of 273 vehicles
with an 85`h- percentile speed of 24.4 mph. There are no clear view issues
and there have been no reported accidents at this intersection in the past
five years.
Edina's residential stop sign traffic policy states that there must be 1,000
vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets for stop signs to be
considered. This intersection does not meet policy guidelines.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign at the
intersection of Lexington Street and Concord Avenue for lack of
warrants.
2. Request to restrict parking to one side of the street on West 59th Street
between Kellogg Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue.
This request comes from a resident on the 5800 block of Oaklawn Ave
who would not be affected by this parking restriction. Requestor states
that cars parked on both sides of the street cause it to narrow making it
difficult to navigate. Requestor states that two of the homes on West 59th
Street have multiple vehicles that are usually parked on the street.
West 59th Street between Kellogg Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue is a 21-
foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. There are no
current parking restrictions on this block.
Four homes would be affected by this parking restriction: 5845 & 5901
Kellogg Avenue and 5844 & 5900 Oaklawn Avenue. Each of these
homes have driveway access onto West 59th Street. A survey was sent to
these four homes seeking input from the residents. Three of the four
surveys were returned all stating that they did not want any parking
restrictions on West 59th Street.
the survey results.
Traffic Safety Staff Review
May 5, 2010
due
Page 3 of 6
G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries\10 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety
Review 05- 05- 10.doc
ATTACHMENT A
3. Request for a stop sign on West 58h Street at Chowen Avenue making this
an All -Way Stop intersection.
There are two residents on Chowen Avenue making this request. They
are concerned with the safety of children in the neighborhood as well as
the speed of the traffic on West 58th Street. A dog was struck and killed at
this intersection on April 7, 2010, at about 5:30 pm.
This intersection is currently controlled by a two -way stop for north/south
Chowen Avenue traffic. West 58th Street is a 28 -foot wide city street with
no curb, gutter or sidewalks. There are no clear view issues and there
have been no other reported accidents at this intersection in the past five
years. There is a stop sign one block to the east at Beard Avenue and a
traffic signal to the west at France. Avenue.
A traffic study completed in the summer of 2009 on West 58th Street just
west of Chowen Avenue shows an average daily traffic count of 1,872
vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 30.4 mph. Edina's all -way stop
sign traffic policy states, "The total vehicular volume entering the
intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per
hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular and
pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least
200 units per hour for the same 8 hours." This intersection does not meet
policy warrants for an all -way stop.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for an all -way stop at the
intersection of West 58th Street and Chowen Avenue for lack of
warrants.
4. Request for a stop sign at the intersection of Parkside Lane and Hollywood
Road for Parkside Lane traffic or an advisory "Children at Play "sign in the
same location.
This request was sent in a letter to Mayor Hovland and forwarded to the
Traffic Safety Committee for follow -up action. The letter was written by
the daughter of a resident on the 4500 block of Parkside Lane who feels
that cars are coming down the hill and around the corner too fast.
Requestor states that neighborhood children often play street hockey and
have been nearly hit by these vehicles.
Parkside Lane is a 30 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no
sidewalks. There are no parking restrictions and no clear view issues.
The intersection of Parkside Lane and Hollywood Road is uncontrolled. A
traffic study conducted in the summer of 2007 shows an average daily
Traffic Safety Staff Review
May 5, 2010
Page 4 of 6
G:\Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 05- 05- 10.doc
ATTACHMENT A
traffic count of 74 vehicles on Hollywood Road just to the east of Parkside
Lane with an 85th- percentile speed of 21.7 mph. Hollywood Road to the
west of Parkside Lane shows a daily traffic count of 153 vehicles with an
85`h- percentile speed of 24.7 mph. Warrants are not met for a stop sign at
this intersection. The city is no longer putting up advisory "Children at
Play" signs.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign on Parkside
Lane at the intersection of Hollywood Road for lack of warrants.
5, Request for a stop sign at Brittney Road and Dunberry Lane for Brittney
Road traffic.
Brittney Road, just to the south of West 69th Street, turns into Dunberry
Lane which continues to the east. This is a non - intersection curve in the
roadway.
This request comes from a resident on Dunberry Lane who is concerned
with the speed of vehicles coming down the hill on Brittney Road and
around the curve at Dunberry Lane. He states there was a recent accident
where a driver lost control coming around the curve and ended up on one
of his neighbor's lawn.
Brittney Road is a 29 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no
sidewalks. There are no clear view issues and there have been no other
reported accidents in the past five years. A traffic study completed in the
summer of 2006 shows Brittney Road with an average daily traffic count
of 507 vehicles and an 85th- percentile speed of 24.7 mph. There is a large
yellow advisory sign with a black arrow indicating the curve in the
roadway. This curve does not meet warrants for a residential stop sign.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign at Brittney
Road where it turns into Dunberry Lane for lack of warrants.
SECTION C:
Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
Request for a stop sign for Brookview Ave at West 55th Street. A traffic
study needs to be completed.
Traffic Safety Staff Review
May 5, 2010
Page 5 of 6
G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\StaffReview Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 05- 05- 10.doc
ATTACHMENT A
SECTION D:
Other traffic safety issues handled:
1. Thirty-three phone calls requesting information concerning various traffic
safety issues.
2. Two calls from residents regarding parking concerns.
3. Request from a resident to increase the speed limit on Interlachen
Boulevard to 35 MPH.
4. Request from the City of Bloomington concerning Edina's parking
restriction policies.
5. Call from a resident wanting to know the procedure for blocking off their
street for a block party.
6. A call from the Connecticut State Police wanting to know Edina's policy
on "In- Street Pedestrian Signs." (How much do they cost and who do we
buy them from).
7. Call from a citizen concerned about the number of traffic accidents that
occur each day on Highway 62.
8. A call from a citizen wanting to know when France Avenue was going to
be resurfaced.
9. Request from a resident wanting a traffic study.
Traffic Safety Staff Review
May 5, 2010
Page 6 of 6
G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Trafric Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety
Review 05- 05- 10.doc
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7
ATTACHMENT B
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 18, 2010
7:06 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by
Member Brindle approving the Council Consent Agenda.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
PRESERVATION MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read a proclamation declaring May, 2010,
to be "Old is the New Green" preservation month in the City of Edina. Member Brindle moved,
seconded by Member Swenson, approving a proclamation declaring May 2010 as Preservation Month.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Associate Planner Repya displayed the Preservation Month poster featuring the Browndale Bridge.
2010 HERITAGE AWARD PRESENTED Ms. Repya announced the 2010 Heritage Award was being
presented to Peter and Sandy Cochrane of 4611 Arden Avenue. She reviewed before - and -after
renovation pictures of their historic American colonial home and advised that the plans had been
approved by the Edina Heritage Preservation Board since this home was located in the historic Country
Club district, listed on the national register of historic places, and part of the Edina Heritage Landmark
District.
Peter Cochrane, award recipient, stated the award was an unexpected recognition. Mr. Cochrane
stated he and his wife had been pleased to collaborate with Kuhl Design Build. He added they were
very pleased with the outcome of their renovation. Mayor Hovland presented the 2010 Heritage Award
to Peter and Sandy Cochrane and congratulated them on this accomplishment.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read a proclamation
declaring May 16 -22, 2010, to be "Emergency Medical Services Week" in the City of Edina. Member
Bennett moved, seconded by Member Brindle, approving a proclamation declaring Emergency Medical
Services Week in the City of Edina.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Fire Chief Scheerer accepted the proclamation, thanked the Council for its support, and introduced
Medical Director Jeffrey Ho. Dr. Ho, thanked the Council for recognizing those who work with
emergency medical services.
*MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 4, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF MAY 4.
2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle approving the minutes
of the Regular Meeting of May 4, 2010, and Work Session of May 4, 2010.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -12 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING
EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DOMESTIC PARTNERS Affidavits of Notice presented and
ordered placed on file.
httn-// www_ ritvnfedina .com /CitvCouncil /CitvCouncil MeetinuMinutes /20100518Retz.htm 9/1/2010
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7
Jessica Kingston, 5801 Brookview Avenue, Vice Chair of the Human Rights & Relations Commissioner,
introduced Commissioners in attendance and presented the domestic partnership ordinance that would
allow domestic partners registration rights and the same rights in public venues as married couples,
and to provide City employees with family leave domestic partner benefits. Ms. Kingston stated the
Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission (HRRC) unanimously recommended adoption of the
ordinance.
The Council discussed the ordinance and asked questions of City Attorney Knutson regarding its
wording related to the definition of a "domestic partnership" to assure it extended to both same and
opposite sex partners. Arnold Bigbee, HRRC Chair, stated their goal was to be fair and equitable to all
and deferred to the recommendation of the City Attorney.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared to testify.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Bennett made a motion to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2010 -12, amending
Edina City Code concerning domestic partners. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
The Council asked questions of staff and Mr. Bigbee about what, the registration program
accomplished. It was indicated that homestead designation, family memberships to City facilities, and
sick/bereavement leaves were available regardless of registration as domestic partners. The Council
discussed that registration would. allow people who were not traditional families the ability to gain
access to visit their partner, should they be hospitalized, access to school records, and could serve as
evidence of partnership in other instances. Mr. Bigbee stated the ordinance and registration program
would provide documentation to make it possible for people who were not traditional families to avail
themselves of those benefits. Mr. Knutson stated the registration program would provide credibility but
not confer legal rights. Manager Hughes indicated if first reading was granted, staff would provide a
recommendation on the fees prior to second reading.
The Council discussed the 45 -day cancellation clause and acknowledged that the City would assume
the affidavit, if signed, met the eight definitions constituting a domestic partnership. Mr. Bigbee noted
that legalized marriage of same sex partners was not allowed in the State of Minnesota and the
registration program would validate the relationship as a declaration of their commitment to each other
and presence in this community as a family. The Council agreed the ordinance would amplify, in
printed form, the human rights expected for all residents of Edina who live in a State where marriage
was not recognized between consenting adults of the same sex. The Council requested staff make
typographical revisions, refine the language defining domestic partners to assure inclusiveness, and
consistently reference that it pertained to two adult partners prior to second reading.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -42 ADOPTED — EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
AMENDED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared to testify.
http: / /www. city ofedina .com /CityCouncil/CityCouncil. _MeetingMinutes /20100518Reg.htm 9/1/2010
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes
Page 3 of 7
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -42, adopting
amendment to employee handbook. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*AWARD OF BID — 2010 FIBER INSTALLATION PHASE ONE, IT -10 -01 Motion made by Member
Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for 2010 fiber -optic installation,
Phase I, to the recommended low bidder, Michels Corporation at $35,042.50.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — FINAL LANDSCAPING FOR NEW EDINA PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Motion
made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member -Brindle awarding the bid for final
landscaping for new Edina Public Works building to the recommended low bidder, Applied
Ecological Services, Inc. at $32,991.55.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — 2010 MILL AND OVERLAY — WEST 691—H STREET Motion made by Member
Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for 2010 mill and overlay, W. 69th
Street: France to York to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, Inca at
$85,395.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*CHANGE ORDER FIRE PROTECTION FOR NEW EDINA PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Motion
made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle approving change order fire
protection for the Edina Public Works building at 7450 Metro Boulevard to Summit Fire
Protection Company.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID — FIRE DEPARTMENT TYPE III AMBULANCE Motion made by Member Bennett
and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for Fire Department Type III Ambulance to
the recommended low bidder, Premier Specialty Vehicles at $138,327.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSES APPROVED — RICE PAPER RESTAURANT Mr. Hughes
presented the request of Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant, LLC, dba, Rice Paper Restaurant, 3948
West 50th Street, for a new on -sale wine and 3.2 beer liquor license. It was noted that all submittals
had been made and staff recommended issuance of the license. Member Brindle made a motion,
seconded by Member Bennett, approving new on -sale wine and on -sale 3.2 beer licenses to
Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant, LLC, dba as Rice Paper Restaurant, for the period
beginning May 18, 2010, and ending March 31,2011.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Steven Mark Andersen, Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant, stated this was their fourth restaurant
and described menu choices offering fresh organic vegetables and presentation of high - quality Asian
entr6es.
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -40 ADOPTED — REVENUE FUND CREATED AND DONATION ACCEPTED
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY FOR BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND Park and Recreation Director Keprios
presented staff's recommendation to accept, with sincere appreciation, the donation from the estate of
http:// www. cityofedina. com/ CityCounciYCityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl201005l8Reg.htm 9/1/2010
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 7
Ruth R. Dahl in the amount of $312.561.64 to the Braemar Memorial Fund. It was noted this was the
largest cash donation made to the City.
Finance Director Wallin answered the Council's questions about how memorial funds were accounted
for in past audit reports as a liability. He advised the resolution would formally establish a special
revenue fund for the specific purpose of enhancing the golf course, and contemplates input by the
Braemar Golf Association, Braemar Men's Club, and Braemar Women's. Club related to expenditures.
The Council emphasized the need to assure transparency and accountability.
Mr. Knutson advised that the ordinance language regarding expenditures to require input from the
Braemar Golf entities was included. at the request of the Dahls. He clarified the intent of the fund was
to enhance the golf course, and the Council would make the final decision after that input. Mr. Hughes
noted the golf course may receive a donation -specified to pay off bonds or to balance operational
deficits. Following discussion, Council consensus was reached that all donations to the Braemar Golf
Course would be deposited into the Memorial Fund with the exception of a donation directed towards
paying down bond repayment or operational deficits.
Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -40, creating a revenue
fund and accepting donation on behalf of the City of Edina. Member Bennett seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
John Valliere, Braemar Golf Course Manager, described Ruth and Wally Dahl's enjoyment for the game
of golf and long involvement with the Braemar Golf Course. He stated the Dahls had no children, but
they would like to schedule a special recognition of the Dahl's nephew and niece. Mayor Hovland
extended the City's deepest .appreciation to the family of Ruth and Wally Dahl for this generous
donation.
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -41 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by
Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member
Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -41 accepting various
donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ART CENTER BOARD APPOINTMENT DISCUSSED The Council noted it had already interviewed
two applicants for the Art Center Board with other applicants for 2010 appointments and agreed that the
third application would be held for future interview when there was a vacancy and the applicant would
be invited to re -apply in 2011 if no other vacancies arose in 2010. The Council asked staff to circulate
the names of the two applicants which Council would rank and consider at the June 1, 2010, Council
meeting.
*RESOLUTION. NO. 2010 -36 CONTINUED — LOT DIVISION, 5500 AND 5504 HALIFAX LANE
Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle to continue consideration of
Resolution No. 2010 -36, lot division; 5500 and 5504 Halifax Lane, to the June 1, 2010, Council
meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF MAY 5. 2010 CONFIRMED Engineer /Public Works Director Houle
presented the resident request for a stop sign on West 58th Street at Chowen Avenue, making it an all -
way stop intersection. He reviewed the standards of the traffic policy for stop signs and advised why
this intersection would not meet standards warrants. Mr. Houle cautioned that installing a stop sign
httv:// www. citvofedina .com/CityCouncil/CityCouncil MeetingMinutes /20100518Reg.htm 9/1/2010
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7
where it was not warranted could result in additional accidents. Due to lack of warrants at West 58th
Street and Chowen Avenue, staff recommended denial of the request for stop signs.
The Council discussed the request and cautionary signage or stop sign configurations to better control
traffic and create pedestrian safety. Mr. Houle noted this was an MSA street with design criteria to
keep traffic moving. Traffic Safety Coordinator Tate stated the current signage in this area was
installed prior to 1957, presumably when this neighborhood was built.
Henry Parkhurst, 5733 Chowen Avenue-, addressed the Council in support of the request.
,Dan Dauth, 5720 Chowen Avenue, addressed the Council in-support of the request.
The Council advised residents they could petition the City to request sidewalks on 58th Avenue. Mr.
Houle advised of the France Avenue restriping project and pedestrian sidewalk route as proposed in
the comprehensive plan.
David Strandberg, 3708 West 571h Street, addressed the Council in support of the request.
Ben Dworsky, 5932 Chowen Avenue, addressed the Council in support of the request.
The Council asked questions of Mr. Houle regarding the difference in warrant standards between the
City's traffic policy and the State's traffic. policy. Mr. Houle explained the State had changed its policy
and those changes had not been incorporated into the City's policy. Should the Council decide its
policy needed to be updated, he recommended it be delayed for a period of one year since the Federal
policy had just been updated and would be followed by another State policy update. Council
consensus was reached that it needed to assure the traffic study contained accurate data consistent
with the State's policy to factor traffic from all directions, neighborhood demographics, and park
locations into the warrant standards. While the Council indicated it did not support ordering a full traffic
study, support was expressed to direct staff to determine whether regulatory and cautionary signage of
this neighborhood was adequate since it had been in place since at least 1957.
Mr. Houle presented the resident request for a stop sign at Brittney Road and Dunberry Lane for
Brittney Road traffic and traffic policy considerations. Due to lack of warrants, staff recommended
denial of the request for a stop sign at Brittney Road where.it turns into Dunberry Lane.
Juan Avila, 4812 Dunberry Lane, addressed the Council in support of the request.
J.B. Overstreet, 4813 Dunberry Lane, addressed the Council in support of the request.
Dan Holland, 4817 Dunberry Lane, addressed the Council in support of the request.
Mr. Tate used a map to identify the location where warrants were taken and indicated he had
conducted the study in 2008 and determined the 85th percentile speed was 24.7 mph. The Council
discussed options for cautionary signage such as "Curve Ahead" with a lower posted speed limit. Mr.
Houle explained that staff could determine the appropriate speed to safely maneuver the curve and
post an advisory . sign. It was noted that posting an advisory sign would not address the concern of
distracted drivers and that the drivers in this area were likely residents of the neighborhood.
The Council discussed the timing when this corner was modified and that it had not been identified as
problematic during the 2006 road reconstruction project. It was determined that reconfiguring this
intersection was not feasible due to the lack of funding. The Council and staff reviewed advanced
warning strategies, and consensus was reached to direct staff to install several reflectorized chevron
sign posts at the end of the intersection. The residents indicated support for the installation of
cautionary signage and sign posts, regardless of aesthetics.
http:// www. cityofedina. com/ CityCounciYCityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl201005l8Reg.htm 9/1/2010
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, confirming the Traffic Safety
Report of May 5, 2010 moving Item B3 to C .which contained items to be acted on a later date,
and upholding the denial of Item B5 with the installation of additional warning signs.
Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
COMMUNITY COMMENT
No one appeared to comment.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member
Brindle approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated May 6, 2010, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $116,689:47; Communications
Fund $554.73; Police Special Revenue $3,321.70; Working Capital Fund $1,512,222.78; Art
Center Fund $26,213.16; Golf Dome Fund $2,743.15; Aquatic Center Fund $10,272.02; Golf
Course Fund $11,439.04; Ice Arena Fund $532.72; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund
$25,807.26; Liquor Fund $109,216.09; Utility Fund $25,691.47; Storm Sewer Fund $488.75; PSTF
Agency Fund $5,861.74; TOTAL $1.851.054.08 and for approval of payment of claims dated May
13, 2010, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $104,437.96; CDBG Fund $11,643.00;
Communications Fund $480.00; Police Special Revenue $1,464.00; General Debt Service Fund
$425.00; Working Capital Fund $282,983.94; Art Center Fund $4,579.35; Aquatic Center Fund
$1,516.49; Golf Course Fund $47,667.52; Ice Arena Fund $15,965.91; Edinborough /Centennial
Lakes Fund $8,167.41; Liquor Fund $298,715.37; Utility Fund $395,859.76; Storm Sewer Fund
$969.95; PSTF Agency Fund $7,700.08; TOTAL $1.182.575.74; and, Credit Card Transactions
dated March 26 — April 26, 2010; TOTAL $8.515.33.
. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes.
UPCOMING MEETING SCHEDULE DISCUSSED — The Council discussed upcoming meetings and
consensus was reached to schedule the following: Edina Country Club presentation on June 1, 2010;
budget forecast on June 15, 2010; and Green Step and EEC discussion on July 6, 2010. Council
consensus was also reached to authorize staff to provide utility companies with the draft franchise fee
ordinance and schedule public hearings.
GRANDVIEW DISTRICT — SMALL AREA STUDY DISCUSSED — Mr. Hughes explained that the
comprehensive plan required that a development proposal including a rezoning or amendment to the
comprehensive plan would require a small area plan prior to any planning application. The authority to
initiate a small area plan rested with the Council. Mr. Hughes identified what would be included in such
a plan. If the community -led Grandview District study was accepted by the Council as a small area
plan, it would. also be adopted into the comprehensive plan by reference and submitted to the
Metropolitan Council for review. If the Grandview District study was not accepted as such, it would
remain an advisory document.
The Council discussed the community -led Grandview District Study and agreed it contained a great
schematic and concepts, but they would like additional details including definitive land uses, height
requirements, and process. Mr. Hughes stated the City's budget did not contain any funding to hire a
consultant. He suggested that a final report be written on the Grandview District for the Council's
review. The Council agreed that the Grandview District Study was an asset and the City would need to
take the lead and be the advocate.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 10:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
http:// www. cityofedina. com/ CityCouncillCityCouncil _Meetingminutesl20100518Reg.htm 9/1/2010
May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 1, 2010.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the May 18, 2010, meeting available.
Page 7 of 7
http:// www. cityofedina .comICityCouncillCityCouncil MeetingMinutesl201005l8Reg.htm 9/1/2010
58'MMINWAU III FIRM 100
62
494
r.MR,
q 111,21
17
31
r-
GRIM �
w
Q
Co
w
ST W
LU
a
w
U
Q
w
LL
a7a APT
c ? 95
1, go 5 APT
?,G. o 85%
30 y yt-7�T
a4 ._49
5TTH ST W
a8 Avg
_ a8.6 ssq
�o
55
31:-:Is69�:
`� i ■_
60TH ST W
A'rTAf-URA=KM f1
N
a / A- -DT
7
a ?-5 85t
MIMI
n�
'- COW# -) rev` wNE
�.oCa 'Ei oiv City of ' 'na 5
Traffic L irol �inee ring Dept
r
®■�,t. ®�!� ®art ®fit , -�� -t ®�_ ®!� ®�
v
►i
®■
mm,■
w■
mm■
m■
aam■■
mun■
u■■
a■■■
�®■
a■
n■■
n■■■■
u■a■■■■
■nn■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
..
■
m■
n■
m■■■■■■
m■
mmilnnm■■
mua■
unuu■
Nn■
�■
n■■
n■■■■
n
■n■■■■■u■•---
-----
�••■••�■■■■■■■■■■I
-
---
--
.
m■■
n■
m■
m•
mfmimllnn®■
mlflf■■
n■■®
�■
1®■
n■
e■■
n■
■
■ ■
®
■n
■W_.O
■ ■
■ ■
■ ■
■ ■
■ ■■■�iW
■
■ ■nl
■munununm■��
.yam.
d!®■
n■■
nu■
uu■
a■
n■■an■un�nuan■■■■n■■n■■■■�,■■nl
,
m■■■
n�ue��aw■
nnm■■
m®-■
aunn■
m■
n■
n■■
alu_•
�■a■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■.■■I
.
■w�,a■■m■■m
®m■na�■mm■n■■oa■m!o:
.■
v■■■
m
■u■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
,
.
�nnnuw■■
mm■
m■
uum■■
m®■
n■■
nn■®■
n■
u■■
u■■■
■n■
®■■n■
®u■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
nun■■
m■
un■
m®
m■
nn®■
mm■
nnnu■
m■®■
�■■
a■■■■
u
■u■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
.
milli
�n���■
■..e�:::::.:
:::
eau::::
n
:::::::::::::
a�.:.
iwei:::
o::
a� :o:::::a:o:::n..u,nnn::n::::ni
ATTACHMENT F
s K� 58th Street and Beard Avenue r
=:8 HourAverage jJune3;2010 D,ata,Setj `
58th Street (Major Street)
Beard Avenue (Minor Street)
West Bound' East Bound' Vehicle Volume
South Bound2 North Bound3 Vehicle Volume
12:00 AM
2
2
4
0
0
0
1:00 AM
0
2
2
0
1
1
2:00 AM
0
1
1
0
0
0
3:00 AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
4:00 AM
1
2
3
1
0
1
5:00 AM
0
3
3
3
1
4
6:00 AM
6
16
22
10
1
*7.6 O,AM
it
10
11
21=
-
9:00 AM
14
33
47
7
7
14
10:00 AM
14
22
36
6
6
12
11:00 AM
19
29
48
7
5
12
12:00 PM
17
30
47
14
6
20
100 PM
5
28
33
6
5
11
sx . •*6 00 PM
- 2D
' '60
� ` 80 Y `' "z
�.1�
�15
1 '
.28
8:00 PM
17
26
43
7
7
14
9:00 PM
10
15
25
2
6
8
10:00 PM
5
6
11
1
3
4
11:00 PM
4
3
7
0
1
1
Tnt!%l
. A
1b3 151 314
* 8 ttilour Average (June 3, .2010 Data Set) � w 77 3r -
1 Traffic Counts for West Bound and East Bound used Station F
2 Traffic Counts for South Bound used Station E
3 Traffic Counts for North Bound used Station G
ATTACIEMENT G
1r,�,.
ok a �, MULTIWAY STOP SIGNS •
.�y TRAFFIC POLICY
a
Revised September 1, 2010 City of Edina
PURPOSE: The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform
treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs.
Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly
warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where
they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and
negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless
noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and
resident within the City.
PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff
member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather
the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution.
Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and
the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to
the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review
recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the
recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that
are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested
issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and
present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to
attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final
authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or
similar request is at the discretion of the City Council.
POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed.
2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight
obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the
installation of a stop sign.
3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for
a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will
remain unchanged.
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \policies\multi way stop.docx
ATTACHMENT G
MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY (CONTINUED)
4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign
installation:
a. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop
is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation
of the traffic control signal.
b. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes
in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and
left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions.
C. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the
major street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours
of an average day, and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume
entering the intersection from the minor street
approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least
200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average
delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30
seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but
3. If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major street
traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the above values.
d. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B,
C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum
values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control
speed.
6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to
control volume.
G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \policies\multi way stop.docx
ATTACHMENT H
A.
o e PEDESTRIAN
� .y CROSSWALKS
� TRAFFIC POLICY
City of Edina
PURPOSE: Both pedestrians and motorists in the State of Minnesota have rights and
responsibilities on the roadway. Pedestrians must obey signals and yield to
motorists if not crossing at an intersection or a crosswalk. Conversely,
motorists are required to yield to pedestrians at crosswalks and when
crossing at intersections. In other parts of the country, this law works well
and pedestrians are protected. In Minnesota, the rights of pedestrians are
not as respected by motorists. This fact creates the potential for accidents
and injury with the improper placement of crosswalks. Excessive use of signs
and pavement markings can substantially reduce the effectiveness of such
devices. A consistent application of this policy will serve both the motorist
and pedestrian within the City.
PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member
you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent
facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts
will be reviewed by the Traffic Safety Committee That group will make a
recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety
review recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the
recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that are
persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested issue,
you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and present your
viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to attend the meeting
with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety
matters. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the
discretion of the City Council.
POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed.
2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records, pedestrian counts, sight
obstructions and demographic analysis shall be reviewed when
considering pedestrian crosswalk installations.
3. Absent engineering data, that clearly indicates the need for a
pedestrian crosswalk, intersections will remain unmarked.
4. Pedestrian crosswalks
unusually hazardous or
pedestrian movement.
Revised 5 -20 -03 by City Council
shall be placed only at locations that are
at locations not readily apparent as having
4
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS (Continued)
5. Pedestrian crosswalks shall only be placed in an area that has in
excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during
any eight -hour period.
6. Marking of pedestrian crosswalks shall be established by analyzing the
"Vehicle Gap Time ". The "Vehicle Gap Time" is the total number of
gaps between vehicular traffic (that are equal to or exceed the required
pedestrian crossing time of three feet per second) recorded during the
average five minute period in the Peak Hour. Pedestrian crosswalks
shall be marked and signed using the following criteria:
a. More than five Gaps — Pavement markings and signage only.
b. Four to five Gaps — Add activated pedestal mounted flasher.
Add overhead mounted flasher if roadway is over 40 feet wide.
c. Less than three Gaps — Add activated overhead mounted
flasher.
The activated pedestal and overhead mounted flasher shall be
designed per City Engineer Standards.
7. Pedestrian crosswalks shall not be located on arterial roads or roads
with a speed limit greater than 30 MPH unless in conjunction with
signalization.
8. Pedestrian crosswalks shall only be placed at intersections.
9. Any of the following conditions may warrant pedestrian crosswalks:
a. Those locations adjacent to and along established pedestrian
routes to and from a school.
b. Locations adjacent to community centers, libraries, and other
high use public facilities.
C. Locations adjacent to public parks.
d. Locations where accident records, sight obstructions and /or
pedestrian volume (see No. 5) warrants the installation.
e. Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons
cross a street.
f. Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a
street.
Revised 5 -20 -03 by City Council 2
3
15 8 A�IM1A71Ii7F X1100
62
494
17
21
31
w
Q
Y
O
~355 Z w
ut wet IF- I
Flr�E�1�® �
> w C
LL
' ' F O i u
C
s / I—
J ;' I
F FF F f r " Proposed c
-, Yield Sign
W 74TH ST
7401 -15 '740 7400
7417 -59
X7405 7404
7409 7408
W 7413 7412
O L I
7425 Z430
w
U)
w
x
w
w
x
7429 7434 i
IT
Aw
- 74.33 : 7438
W 75TH ST +01
Proposed j
Stop Sign
7501 -53
City of Edina
Proposed Signs
NN 1
W+E
`S
Engineering Dept
September, 2010
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check
Register
Page - 1
9/9/2010
-9/9/2010
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
338817 9/912010
126163 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP.
5,225.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7
245000
090310
4402.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
PW BUILDING
5,225.00
338818 9/9/2010
106076 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC.
12,312.98
IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00002363 244825
28775
5600.1720
BUILDINGS
EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
12,312.98
338819 9/912010
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
31.00
244727
0765017
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
56.20
244728
0724452
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
105.60
244729
0765018
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
92.00
244910
560563
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
41.40
244911
0807303
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
66.60
244912
0724450
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
102.20
244913
0765016
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
47.40
244914
0807398
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
62.60
244915
0724499
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
28.80
244916
0724500
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
64.40
245107
0724501
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
698.40
338820 919/2010
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
599.50
CARTRIDGES
244826
INV00098596
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
599.50
338821 9/9/2010
100576 ALL SAFE INC.
166.32
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245001
101252
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
32.71
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245169
101255
5841.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
YORK OCCUPANCY
30.44
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245170
101256
5821.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
32.71
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245171
101257
5861.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
262.18
338822 91912010
102716 ALLEGRA EDINA
270.39
PARK PRESS
245172
83114
5621.6575
PRINTING
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
270.39
338823 9/9/2010
101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES
49.00
245002
083110
5821.6201
LAUNDRY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
1:3.94
245002
063110
5841.6201
LAUNDRY
YORK OCCUPANCY
112.26
245002
083110
5861.6201
LAUNDRY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
137.16
245002
083110
4470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERA'
R55CKREG LOG20000
1,043.68
CITY OF EDINA
•
Council Check Register
338824 9/9/2010
9/9/2010 -9/912010
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
197.96
245002
083110 5421.6201
LAUNDRY
230.87
245002
083110 1551.6201
LAUNDRY
262.49
245002
083110 1470.6201
LAUNDRY
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page- 2
Business Unit
CITY HALL GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,043.68
338824 9/9/2010
102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE
682.62
FOOD
245003
1413710
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
682.62
338826 9/9/2010
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
65.58
FLOW SWITCH
244671
36216
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
31.11
O -RING
244672
36171
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
96.69
338826 9/912010
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
74.36
COFFEE
245078
417305
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
74.36
338827 9/9/2010
103191 ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
15.00
MEMBERSHIP 849- 000 -1779
244673
082710
1640.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
15.00
338828 9/9/2010
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
379.95
1 -20973 1 DUMPSTER 00001334
244674
082410
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
33.00
245079
SEPT01
5821.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
33.28
245079
SEPT01
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK FIRE STATION
44.71
245079
SEPT01
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
56.55
245079
SEPT01
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
73.92
245079
SEPT01
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
78.11
245079
SEPT01
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
78.11
245079
SEPT01
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
81.29
245079
SEPT01
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
83.66
245079
SEPT01
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
88.77
245079
SEPT01
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
99.35
245079
SEPT01
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
146.78
245079
SEPT01
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
197.25
245079
SEPT01
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
232.79
245079
SEPT01
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
238.25
245079
SEPT01
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
309.03
245079
SEPT01
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
424.03
245079
SEPT01
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CLUB HOUSE
612.03
245079
SEPT01
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 3
9/9/2010 -9/912010
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
452.93
245173
1- 209046 -9/10
5311.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
POOL OPERATION
3,743.79
338829 9/9/2010
124846 ASSEMBLED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
92.06
EQUIPMENT PARTS 00003109
244827
595033
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
92.06
338830 9/9/2010
127214 ATLAS FOUNDATION COMPANY
46,930.00
EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM 00007005
245081
987137
5500.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
46,930.00
338831 91912010
104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN
112.32
BUSINESS CARDS
245004
473
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
112.32
338832 91912010
100638 BACHMAN'S
15.07
FERTILIZER
245174
14213284,142166
5422.6540
FERTILIZER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
57
138.93
SHRUBS
245174
14213284,142166
5630.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
57
154.00
338833 91912010
126300 BAUMAN, DOUG
94.25
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
244754
083110
5510.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
94.25
338834 9/9/2010
101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION
2,006.88
244730
54591900
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
61.50
244731
54591700
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
48.03
244732
84114300
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
121.97
244733
84115500
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
637.20
244867
54600000
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
885.15
244868
54591800
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
703.15
244917
54600100
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
406.25
244918
54591500
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
21.00
244919
54591600
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
208.59
244920
5978600
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
146.41
244921
84116300
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5,246.13
338835 9/9/2010
117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC.
705.38
LAWN CARE
245082
136043
7411.6136
SNOW & LAWN CARE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register .
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 4
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PW BUILDING
FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK
BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
705.38
338836
9/9/2010
125139 BERNICK'S WINE
285.60
245108
5092
5822.5513
285.60
338837
91912010
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
21.36
SELF -SEAL MAILERS
244675
WO- 640487 -1
1600.6406
44.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES
244828
WO- 640067 -1
1400.6513
59.27
OFFICE SUPPLIES
244829
OE- 233591 -1
1628.6513
125.20
338838
91912010
116336 BLOOMINGTON CHRYSLER
JEEP
66.00
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005132
245005
30094
1553.6180
66.00
338839
9/9/2010
122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
22.71
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00001437
244755
62265
1552.6406
158.15
CLOCKS
00001437
245083
62358
4402.1705
180.86
338840
919/2010
106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL
LLC
1,097.88
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003786
244830
87176853
1470.6510
1,097.88
338841
9/9/2010
119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
195.00
244922
100528
5862.5513
195.00
338842
9/9/2010
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
13.79
AIR FILTER
00001060
244756
418623
1553.6530
66.54
PANEL COWL
00001060
244757
418303X1
1553.6530
130.88
WIRING ASSEMBLY
00005134
245006
437905X1
1553.6530
211.21
338843
9/9/2010
103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN
GLASS CO.
593.69
GLASS FOR GREAT HALL
00002156
245175
5138935
5620.6180
593.69
338844
9/9/2010
102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN
8,515.21
ASPHALT
00001210
244676
8299MB
1314.6518
9,093.14
ASPHALT
00001210
244677
8308MB
1314.6518
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 4
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PW BUILDING
FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK
BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 5
9/9/2010
- 9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
10,938.87
ASPHALT 00001210
244678
8326MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
6,068.45
ASPHALT 00001210
244679
8336MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
7,213.70
ASPHALT 00001210
244680
8344MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
41, 829.37
338845
9/9/2010
120936 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
10,573.40
LEGAL
245007
2851G -7/10
1195.6131
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
10,573.40
338846
9/912010
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
11,395.80
244869
12284
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
87.65
244870
12285
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
112.70
244923
12246
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
1,108.60
244924
12282
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
12,704.75
338847
919/2010
116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
87.00
244871
87501
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
129.00
244925
87502
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
216.00
338848
9/912010
100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
395.00
BOILER SEMINAR SERIES
244831
090110
1240.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL
395.00
338849
91912010
116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC.
499.21
ENVELOPES
245008
27955
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
499.21
338850
9/9/2010
119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
514.90
244872
426396
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
45.00
244926
426152
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
SOTH ST SELLING
238.25
244927
426151
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
798.15
338851
9/912010
100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
750.00
CABLE CHARGES -VIDEO
244758
48459
1180.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ELECTION
750.00
338852
9/9/2010
122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES
367.74
00105263-0335037016
244681
335037016 -8/10
5420.6189
SEWER & WATER
CLUB HOUSE
37.95
00103426 -0345052024
245009
345052024 -8/10
+552.6189
SEWER & WATER
CENT SVC PW BUIL1"
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/912010 7:41:49
Council Check Register Page - 6
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6,229.37 00103426 -0345052006 245010 345052006 -8/10 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER
6,635.06
338863 9/9/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
244928 0178161015 5862.5515
245109 0148436118 5822.5515
338864
919/2010
120433 COMCAST
59.00
8772 10 614 0199138
245011
199138 -8/10
5422.6188
74.95
8772 10 614 0165667
245012
165667 -8/10
5424.6406
88.26
8772 10 614 0177449
245013
177449 -8/10
5420.6188
82.59
8772 10 614 0164959
245014
164959 -8/10
5430.6188
304.80
338856
9/9/2010
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
497.79
GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00005033
245077
03743077
1553.6610
497.79
338866
9/9/2010
101974 CONNIE'S CATERING
540.96
GOLF COURSE FOOD
245016
082610
5421.5510
540.96
338867
919/2010
100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC.
182,727.75
ARENA RINK CONSTRUCTION
245084
APPL. NO.7
5500.1705
182,727.75
338868
9/9/2010
124910 COURSE TRENDS INC.
100.00
EMAIL MARKETING
245017
167666
5410.6122
100.00
338869
9/9/2010
121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS
NORTH
448.88
PRECAST CB 00001536
245018
S000021245
5932.6520
448.88
338860
9/9/2010
104020 DALCO
328.82
GRILL CLEANER, BLEACH
245019
2245798
5421.6511
328.82
338861
919/2010
124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC.
1,078.00
244873
8301075
5842.5514
462.00
245110
8301068
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
TELEPHONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
ADVERTISING OTHER
CONCRETE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
Business Unit
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RANGE
CLUB HOUSE
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GRILL
ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL STORM SEWER
GRILL
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/912010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 7
9/9/2010
- 9/9/2010
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,540.00
338862 91912010
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
3,403.10
244874
567101
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
711.80
244929
567100
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
66.30
245111
567098
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,852.95
245112
567099
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
7,034.15
338863 9/912010
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
4.81
PIPE TAP
00001384 244759
508806
1553.6556
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
186.22
WALL CHARTS, WRENCHES
00001380 244760
508062
1553.6556
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
191.03
338864 9/9/2010
122135 DENFELD, SCOTT
7.00
REIMBURSEMENT
244832
083110
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
136.16
REIMBURSEMENT
244832
083110
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
143.16
338865 9/9/2010
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
42.25
BAKERY
245020
342672
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
86.43
BAKERY
245021
342919
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
94.02
BAKERY
245022
342913
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
51.87
BAKERY
245023
343071
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
51.34
BAKERY
245024
343308
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
325.91
338866 919/2010
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC.
550.80
110311893
244682
110311893 -8/10
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
550.80
338867 919/2010
100731 DPC INDUSTRIES
402.31
CHLORINE
244683
82701351 -10
5311.6545
CHEMICALS
POOL OPERATION
4,145.36
CHEMICALS
00001215 245085
82701372 -10
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
4,547.67
338868 919/2010
124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO.
32.38
MEN20 EDISON
00001549 244684
07441600
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
69.78
CONDUIT, CLAMPS
00001568 244761
07445000
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
30.63
CLAMPS, CONDUIT
00001570 244762
07447400
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
137.18
WIRES FOR WELDERS
00001549 245025
07417600
4402.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PW BUILDING
269.97
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check
Register
Page - 8
9/9/2010
— 919/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
338869
91912010
105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES
735.00
MN DISTANCE RUNNING ASSOC 244833
083110
1428.6010
SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES
OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT
735.00
338870
9/912010
103694 EDINALARM INC.
240.47
MONITORING SERVICE 244763
60963
5821.6250
ALARM SERVICE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
269.33
MONITORING SERVICE 244764
60961
5821.6250
ALARM SERVICE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
288.56
MONITORING SERVICE 244764
60961
5861.6250
ALARM SERVICE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
262.91
MONITORING SERVICE 244765
60962
5861.6250
ALARM SERVICE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
557.89
MONITORING SERVICE 244765
60962
5841.6250
ALARM SERVICE
YORK OCCUPANCY
1,619.16
338871
9/9/2010
100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC
5,000.00
ARBITRAGE MONITORING SERVICE 245176
61079
3101.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES
3,000.00
ARBITRAGE MONITORING SERVICE 245177
61080
1000.1303
DUE FROM HRA
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
8,000.00
338872
9/9/2010
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
1,065.08
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 244834
1303259
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
40.25
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 244835
1303043
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
37.73
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 244836
1303554
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,143.06
338873
9/9/2010
123791 ERICKSON, MINDY
88.40
ART WORK SOLD 244984
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
88.40
338874
9/9/2010
100762 EBB BROTHERS & SONS INC.
1,313.49
RISER RINGS, TOP SECTIONS 00001529 244837
NN3425
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
1,313.49
338876
9/9/2010
100018 EXPERT T BILLING
5,407.50
AUGUST TRANSPORTS 245164
090210
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,407.50
338876
9/9/2010
104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC.
315.00
244930
873184
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
315.00
338877
9/9/2010
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
33.99
CAP, ROTOR 00005099 244766
69- 019179
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
831.99
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/912010
102846 FCC.LCC
9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
36.62
RESISTOR
00005100 244838
69- 019307 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
431.24
TIE RODS, ARMS
00005121 245026
69- 019524 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
49.03
FUEL PUMP, STRAINER
00005121 245027
69- 019371 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
281.11
FUEL SENDER, GASKET
00005121 245028
69- 019366 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DATA PROCESSING
REPAIR PARTS
SERVICES CUSTODIANS
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page- 9
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
METER REPAIR
YORK OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERA'
831.99
338878
9/912010
102846 FCC.LCC
188.48
EXTREME BASE
245029
15809
1400.6160
188.48
338879
91912010
126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
30,729.61
METER TEST BENCH
00005257
244767
S01211065.001
5917.6530
30,729.61
338880
9/912010
106420 FIKES SERVICES
41.25
AIR DEODORIZERS
245030
1100
5841.6162
41.25
338881
91912010
101476 FOOTJOY
1,454.31
MERCHANDISE
245031
3340611
5440.5511
1,454.31
338882
9/9/2010
106361 FOSTER, REBECCA
86.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
244839
090110
1260.6107
86.00
338883
9/9/2010
120776 GAGE, NATHALIE
53.80
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
244685
083010
2210.6107
53.80
338884
91912010
103186 GERTENS
36.33
CEDAR MULCH
00001606
245165
202587
1644.6541
18.17-
CREDIT
245166
202588
1644.6541
138.94
DELIVERY
00001606
245167
203481
1644.6541
157.10
338886
9/912010
102260 GIFT BOX CORPORATION
OF AMERIC
271.34
BAGS
245032
11423745
5440.6406
271.34
338886
91912010
118941 GLOBALSTAR USA
29.02
R -91 PHONE
244840
2425749
1470.6188
DATA PROCESSING
REPAIR PARTS
SERVICES CUSTODIANS
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page- 9
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
METER REPAIR
YORK OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERA'
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
338887 9/912010
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
29.02
100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC.
Business Unit
1,054.15 AUGUST SERVICE 00001544 245086 0080485 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
1,054.15
9/9/2010
124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL
338888 91912010
101103 GRAINGER
29.00
BALANCE TIRES
00005126 245035
15163
1553.6180
253.36
TRAYS, FILE HOLDERS
00005028
244686
9331944638
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
252.14
WASTEBASKETS, ORGANIZERS
00005028
244687
9331305731
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
58.10
FIRST AID KITS, LAB COAT,SHOES
00005031
244768
9333129568
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
122.07
FIRST AID KITS, LAB COAT,SHOES
00005031
244768
9333129568
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
139.88
FIRST AID KITS, LAB COAT,SHOES
00005031
244768
9333129568
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
19.02
BATTERIES
00001578
244841
9334161479
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
544.17
PLASTIC BINS
00001563
245033
9328290821
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56.22
BIN DIVIDERS
00001567
245034
9330394231
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
142.03
BELTS FOR HVAC
245087
9338381842
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
465.96
GLOVES, EAR PLUGS
00001533
245088
9334915700
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
248.40
UPS
00001533
245089
9334915718
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
48.76
FILTERS
00002164
245178
9332820472
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,350.11
00007515 244843
269960
5842.651P
PAPER SUPPLIES
338889 91912010
102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC
00007516 245037
270132
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 10
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
PSTF OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
WELL HOUSES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
244931 00025643 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
338890
9/9/2010
124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL
29.00
BALANCE TIRES
00005126 245035
15163
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
54.95
ALIGNMENT
00005128 245036
468237
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
83.95
338891
919/2010
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
80.25
244875
121834
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2,751.00
244932
121835
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2,831.25
338892
9/912010
101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE
196.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
244842
090110
5840.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
196.00
338893
91912010
102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS
169.77
REGISTER ROLLS
00007515 244843
269960
5842.651P
PAPER SUPPLIES
169.77
REGISTER ROLLS
00007516 245037
270132
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/9/2010 —9/9/2010
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 11
Business Unit
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION
LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL•
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT
339.54
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
338894
919/2010
101733 HANLY, WILLIAM
74.95
SCHOOLBOOKS
245090
090310
1640.6104
74.95
.
338895
91912010
125270 HARTFORD
4.75
SEPT 2010 COBRA
245038
090110
1550.6043
4.75
338896
91912010
127220 HAVENS, GARY
44.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
245161
090710
1470.4329
44.00
338897
9/9/2010
100797 HAWKINS INC.
299.53
CAUSTIC SODA
244688
3151818
5311.6545
299.53
338898
91912010
100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC.
4,328.62
WALLING 00001460
245092
747808
1344.6577
4,328.62
338899
9/9/2010
101576 HEGGIES PIZZA
194.15
PIZZA
245039
1705519
5421.5510
194.15
338900
9/9/2010
106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES
2,475.08
MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICE
244769
QB14608
1470.6103
2,475.08
338901
9/912010
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
1,269.68
PCS FOR PW MECH 00004360
244770
48153195
421553.6710
395.44
MONITORS FOR UTILITY BILLING 00004362
244771
48170789
1554.6710
106.87-
CREDIT 00004347
244772
48166886
1554.6710
1,558.25
338902
9/912010
103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS
125.17
AIR FRESHENER 00002163
245179
6439471
5620.6511
125.17
338903
9/912010
104376 HOHENSTEINS INC.
2,996.25
244876
533131
5842.5514
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 11
Business Unit
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION
LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL•
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG2000D
CITY OF EDINA
9/912010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 12
9/9/2010
-9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
453.00
244933
533071
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
56.00
245113
533118
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
999.50
245114
533117
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
4,504.75
338904
9/9/2010
100808 HORWATH, THOMAS
494.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
245168
090710
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
TREES & MAINTENANCE
494.00
338905
9/9/2010
119998 HOVLAND, JAMES
93.62
MEETING EXPENSES
245180
090710
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
93.62
338906
919/2010
126408 HUFCOR MINNESOTA LLC
7,115.00
ACCORDION FOLDING DOORS
00005894 245040
1869
4402.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PW BUILDING
2,100.00
ACCORDION FOLDING DOORS
00005894 245041
1909
4402.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PW BUILDING
9,215.00
338907
9/9/2010
120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC.
2,358.28
VFD REPAIR
00001512 244773
4153
5912.6530
REPAIR PARTS
WELL HOUSES
2,358.28
338908
9/912010
127184 IVERSON, KATHLEEN
65.00
ART WORK SOLD
244985
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
65.00
338909
9/912010
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
9,616.75
244934
1423475
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
337.20
245042
1428251
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
7,674.50
245115
1423476
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,347.32
245116
1423501
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
4,190.80
245117
1423453
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
173.80
245118
1423499
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
9,589.79
245119
1423498
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5,302.47
245120
1423508
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
73.90
245121
1423509
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
38,306.53
338910
919/2010
124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO
58.46
GRASS SEED
00001550 244844
55438965
5913.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
DISTRIBUTION
58.46
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register Page - 13
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
338912 9/9/2010
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
2,840.38
244734
1897096
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,013.83
244735
1897094
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5,087.22
244877
1897076
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
3,020.23
244878
1897087
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5,660.68
244879
1897085
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
22.07-
244880
469586
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
11.03-
244881
469585
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6.20-
244882
469584
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
29.12
244935
1901610
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,732.90
244936
1901615
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,742.92
244937
1901612
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2.24
244938
1901613
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
233.24
244939
1901608
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,970.56
244940
1901611
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
302.90
244941
1901609
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
8,042.82
244942
1901614
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
100.37-
244943
469587
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
98.11
245122
1901607
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,988.80
245123
1901606
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,613.54
245124
1901603
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
185.24
245125
1901600
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,178.83
245126
1901602
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,400.50
245127
1901601
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.12
245128
1901599
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
8,826.13
245129
1901604
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.12
245130
1901605
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,889.50
245131
1901598
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,211.11
245132
1901597
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
112.12
245133
1901593
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
133.25
245134
1901594
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
546.92
245134
1901594
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,535.75
245135
1901596
5822.5513
jCOST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,541.54
245136
1901595
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
10.69-
245137
470051
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
9.79-
245138
470049
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
88.83-
245139
470139
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
59.77-
245140
470048
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
213.24-
245141
470050
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
62,420.63
338913 919/20
124869 JOHNSON, BRYAN
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check
Register
Page - 14
9/9/2010
-9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
70.20
ART WORK SOLD
244986
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
70.20
338914
9/9/2010
118069 JOYCE, CYNTHIA
69.55
ART WORK SOLD
244987
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
69.55
338916
9/9/2010
126301 KENNY BOILER & MFG. CO.
681.50
BOILER INSPECTION
00008012 244774
76357
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
681.50
338916
9/9/2010
100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN
102.10
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
244845
090110
1600.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
102.10
338917
9/9/2010
101602 KONTERS, VIK
92.61
UNIFORM PURCHASE
245043
083110
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
92.61
338918
9/912010
122446 LACKAS, TIM
150.00
ENTERTAINMENT 9/12/10
245181
090310
5621.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
150.00
338919
9/9/2010
101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC.
44.95
REPAIR PARTS
00002349 244846
215192
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
44.95
338920
9/9/2010
116722 LANZO, BARBARA
318.50
ART WORK SOLD
244988
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
318.50
338921
9/9/2010
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
342.55
.NUTS. BOLTS. OPENBSHUT
00005024 244689
9529933
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
342.55
338922
91912010
116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA
83.85
ART WORK SOLD
244989
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
83.85
338923
9/912010
125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS
81.15
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
244847
090110
1554.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
81.15
R55CKREG LOG20000
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2,240.10
CITY OF EDINA
244736
92839
5842.5515
EDINBOROUGH PARK
Council Check Register
244737
93109
5822.5515
919/2010 - 9/9/2010
2,983.26
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
338924
9/9/2010
101792 LOBE -TECH
564.30
776.48
DELO GREASE 00005040 244775
1808564 1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
776.48
338925
9/9/2010
9/9/2010
102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY
101987 MENARDS
81.00
EVIDENCE BAGS 244848
227168 1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00002364 244776
12935
81.00
158.28
338926
9/9/2010
12581
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 15
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2,240.10
CENTENNIAL LAKES
244736
92839
5842.5515
EDINBOROUGH PARK
743.16
244737
93109
5822.5515
2,983.26
338927
9/912010
100876 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
564.30
PLANTS
00002138 245182
49310
5620.6620
564.30
338928
9/9/2010
101987 MENARDS
55.63
ROPE, HARDWARE, TAPE
00002364 244776
12935
5630.6406
158.28
PAINT AND SUPPLIES
00002369 244649
12581
5630.6406
298.29
ALGAECIDE, MOWER
00002368 245183
15098
5630.6406
26.78
TAPE, PAINTERS TOOLS
00002166 245184
16345
5620.6406
538.98
338929
9/9/2010
100885 METRO SALES INC
294.00
QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE
245044
373138
1552.6103
294.00
338930
9/912010
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
ENVIRONME
355,505.96
SEWER SERVICE
245093
0000940227
5922.6302
355,505.96
338931
9/9/2010
102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF
EDEN PRAI
129.95
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005125 245045
175990
1553.6180
129.95
338932
9/9/2010
102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN
138.78
ART WORK SOLD
244990
083110
5101.4413
138.78
338933
9191204'
100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 15
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 16
9/9/2010
— 9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,500.74
ASPHALT 00001224 244691
106547MB
1301.6518
BLACKTOP
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,500.74
338934
9/9/2010
101604 MIDWEST GANG INVESTIGATORS ASS
50.00
CLASS REGISTRATION 245046
090210
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
50.00
338936
919/2010
102442 MIKE'S PRO SHOP
15.69
PLATE & PARTS FOR TROPHY 244777
56934
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
15.69
338936
9/9/2010
121063 MILLER, SUSAN
359.94
PETTY CASH 245185
090310
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
359.94
338937
9/9/2010
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
1,470.00
REPAIR WATER SERVICE 00001538 244850
33690
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,470.00
338938
9/9/2010
116498 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE SWING BAND
100.00
ENTERTAINMENT 9/19/10 245186
090310
5621.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
100.00
338939
919/2010
127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC.
42.75
WINDOW CLEANING 244851
921075419
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
YORK OCCUPANCY
10.71
WINDOW CLEANING 244852
9529035730
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
32.14
WINDOW CLEANING 244853
9529035730
5861.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
85.60
338940
9/9/2010
112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO.
1,145.70
ASPHALT EMULSION 00001213 244692
61688
1314.6519
ROAD OIL
STREET RENOVATION
1,145.70
338941
9/9/2010
103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
309.59
DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASSES 244854
10661
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
309.59
338942
9/9/2010
117016 MOLITOR & ASSOCIATES
119.00
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 245187
090210
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
119.00
338943
9/912010
108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 17
9/9/2010
-9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
150.00
ENTERTAINMENT 9/16/10
245188
090310
5621.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
150.00
338944
9/9/2010
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
122.68
IRRIGATION PARTS
00001595 245094
756244 -00
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
122.68
338945
9/912010
101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1
642.32
1/4 TURN VALVE
00001518 244690
00184161_SNV
5920.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SEWER CLEANING
642.32
338946
9/912010
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
342.00
244883
61523
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
696.00
244944
61522
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,038.00
338947
9/9/2010
127217 NORDBY, CLAUDETTE
126.00
CLASS REFUND
245189
083110
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
126.00
338948
91912010
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
286.06
SKETCH PADS, PENCILS
00009249 245047
39385600
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
286.06
338949
9/912010
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
82.04
TONER
00006034 245048
1248143621
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
43.90
NOTES, FOLDERS
245190
530161724001
5621.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
125.94
338950
9/9/2010
124089 OHMANN, NANCY
191.10
ART WORK SOLD
244991
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
191.10
338951
9/912010
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
27.63
SHACKLES
00005092 244693
606651
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
27.63
338952
9/912010
123786 OLSON, VICKI
95.55
ART WORK SOLD
244992
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
95.55
338953
91912011
126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC.
R55CKREG LOG20000
720.75
CITY OF EDINA
245191
36234
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
Council Check
Register
9/9/2010
— 9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
73.72
AERATOR 00001566 244694
863.70
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
245049
090310
04371.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
73.72
2,700.66
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
245049
090310
05493.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
9/9/2010
3,135.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
245049
090310
03450.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
3,876.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
245049
090310
03458.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
50TH ST SELLING
14,477.31
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
245049
090310
01374.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
32,615.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3
245049
090310
01361.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
57,667.67
2,031.03
244945
338954
9/912010
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
108686 OTTERLIE, JON
1,408.77
244946
8272838 -IN
81.68
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
245162
090710
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
244947
81.68
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
338965
9/912010
124450 OVERHOLT, LUTHER
338959
91912010
156.50
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
245095
090210
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
156.50
244855
8381003
5910.6155
BANK SERVICES CHARGES
338956
9/9/2010
100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 18
Business Unit
STS -371 INTERLACHEN BLUFF
WM-493 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE
SS-450 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE
SS-458 INTERLACHEN BLUFF
BA-374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF
BA -361 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
TREES & MAINTENANCE
720.75
HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT
245191
36234
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
720.75
338957
9/9/2010
118872 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA INC.
73.72
AERATOR 00001566 244694
17445800
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
73.72
338968
9/9/2010
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
2,332.28
244738
8272176 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,129.43
244884
8272996 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
486.00
244885
8273003 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,031.03
244945
8273006 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,408.77
244946
8272838 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,408.77-
244947
8272839 -CM
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
6,978.74
338959
91912010
125492 PAYPAL INC.
39.95
244855
8381003
5910.6155
BANK SERVICES CHARGES
GENERAL (BILLING)
39.95
338960
9/9/2010
100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
418.19 ,
244778
64001586
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
910.88
245050
64001637
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
1,329.07
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 19
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
338961 9/9/2010
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
176.00
244739
2954420
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
8.19-
244740
3443240
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
6.32-
244741
3440764
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6.89-
244742
3440765
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,331.43
244886
2954193
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
757.79
244948
2957325
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,833.60
244949
2955853
5862.5513,
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,582.43
244950
2957322
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
57.12
244951
2957323
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1.12
244952
2957318
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,019.46
244953
2957324
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,660.14
245142
2957315
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
237.88
245143
2957316
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
692.49
245144
2957321
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,833.60
245145
2955852
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,887.25
245146
2955851
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.12
245147
2957317
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
993.21
245148
2957320
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,419.19
245149
2957319
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3.00-
245150
3442239
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
18,459.43
338962 9/9/2010
124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
280.00
244743
10927
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
535.20
245151
10992
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
815.20
338963 91912010
100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL
44.52
PEST CONTROL
245096
1898488
7411.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
44.52
338964 9/912010
119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
127.72
CENTERING PIN SET 00005015
244856
780142
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
998.75
TIRES 00001423 244857
780805
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,126.47
338965 9/9/2010
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
2,600.00
UTILITY PERMIT #939
245051
090210
5910.6235
POSTAGE
GENERAL (BILLING)
2,600.00
338966 9/9/201n
100971 QUALITY WINE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 20
9/9/2010
-919/2010
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
3,964.00
244887
350753 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,830.00
244888
350752 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,228.77
244889
350751 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,165.87
244890
350759 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
396.00
244891
351022 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,058.70
244892
350903 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
369.80
244893
350900 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
18.60
244894
350901 -CO
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
417.60
244895
351020 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,512.27
244954
350754 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
937.34
244955
351021 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
866.80
244956
350902 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
16,765.75
338967 919/2010
123898 QWEST
367.60
952 927 -8861
244695
8861 -8/10
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
55.71
952 929 -0297
244696
0297 -8/10
4090.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE
423.31
338968 9/912010
104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY
53.45
POOL VAC BELTS
245192
208672
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
53.45
338969 919/2010
127221 RICE, JEAN
85.79
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
245163
090710
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
85.79
338970 9/912010
118668 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC.
227.38
WINDSHIELD TINT
00005130 245052
60280
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
222.03
WINDSHIELD TINT
00005133 245053
60183
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
449.41
338971 91912010
127196 ROTHMAN, AMY
2.71
DAILY ADMISSION REFUND
244697
083010
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
37.29
DAILY ADMISSION REFUND
244697
083010
5301.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
40.00
338972 9/912010
106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER
CO.
39.23
STAKES
00001565 244698
40867793
1314.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET RENOVATION
69.48
LUMBER
00001565 244699
40869002
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
87.83
LUMBER
00001036 245097
40854267
1314.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET RENOVATION
196.54
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page- 21
9/9/2010
—9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
338973
919/2010
127219 SCHMIDT, JULIE
96.00
EDINBOROUGH MEMBER REFUND
245193
090310
5601.4532
SEASON TICKETS
EB /CL REVENUES
96.00
338974
919/2010
101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA
118.30
ART WORK SOLD
244993
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
118.30
338975
919/2010
127213 SILVIS, LUCINDA
84.50
ART WORK SOLD
244994
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
84.50
338976
919/2010
101000 SIR SPEEDY
46.44
BUSINESS CARDS
245098
66056
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
46.44
338977
9/9/2010
119422 SIZER, CORA LEE
62.40
ART WORK SOLD
244995
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
62.40
338978
9/9/2010
106416 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY INC.
1,344.00
BASKETBALL PROGRAM
244779
3241023817
1600.4390.22
MINI HAWKS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
1,344.00
338979
9/9/2010
123906 SNIPERCRAFT INC.
3,200.00
SWAT SUPERVISOR COURSE
245099
0827SS2010
7410.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
3,200.00
338980
9/9/2010
122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY
1,250.00
REGISTRATION FEES
245054
8432•
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,250.00
338981
9/912010
110977 SOW, ADAMA
172.25
ART WORK SOLD
244996
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
172.25
338982
9/9/2010
101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
144.74
PROPANE 00001667
245100
082310
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
247.71
PROPANE 00001667
245100
082310
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
392.45
R55CKREG LOG20000
625.25
1553.6530
CITY OF EDINA
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
338984 91912010
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
Council Check Register
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
FALL ADS
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
338983 919/2010
101004 SPS COMPANIES
338985 91912010
220.79
GALV PIPE
00001026 244780
S2221982.001 5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
189.82
VALVES, PIPE
00005096 244859
S2250680.001 1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
214.64
FAUCET
00002166 245194
S2250498.001 5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1553.6530
625.25
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
338984 91912010
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
101007 STAR TRIBUNE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
3,775.00
FALL ADS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
245055
083110
3,775.00
338985 91912010
124476 STEVENS. ENGINEERS INC. '
1,699.68
CONSULTING SERVICES
244858
8304
5,951.81
CONSULTING SERVICES
245056
8320
7,651.49
338986 9/912010
101015 STREICHERS
331.29
PUSH BUMPERS, GRILL LIGHTS
245057
1767220
331.29
338987 919/2010
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
73.95
ATF CONNECTOR
00005090
244781
259239
95.45
BEARING
00005089
244782
259237X1
18.34
PINS
00005089
244783
259237
1,430.62
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005129
245058
577261
1,086.74
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005131
245059
577582
917.98
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005124
245060
577550
366.59
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005095
245061
578249
2,553.24
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005127
245062
577799
13.03
F- SWITCH
00001422
245063
260071
6,555.94
338988 9/9/2010
113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO.
7,626.60
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 &8
245101
091010
7,626.60
338989 9/9/2010
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
260.00
AD FOR CLASSES
00008011
244784
1270339
260.00
338990 919/2010
120998 SURLY BREWING CO.
1,162.00
244896
Z01425
596.00
245152
MVP01465
1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
5511.6406
5842.5514
5862.5514
GENERAL SUPPLIES
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 22
Business Unit
UIJ I RIDU I IVIV
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CONTINGENCIES
ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PW BUILDING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/9/2010 - 9/912010
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5101.4413
5421.6102
1647.6103
47069.6710
5862.5515
5421.5514
5421.5514
5862.5515
5862.5514
5862.5514
1600.6107
1120.6103
1553.6580
5630.6406
1330.6215
ART WORK SOLD
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 23
Business Unit
ART CENTER REVENUES
GRILL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WELDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VERNON SELLING
GRILL
GRILL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
1,758.00
338991 919/2010
116868 SWENSON, SUSAN
58.50
ART WORK SOLD 244997
083110
58.50
338992 9/912010
111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC.
38.00
BEER LINE CLEANING 245064
893355
38.00
338993 9/9/2010
113649 TENNIS WEST
8,370.00
RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS 00001484 244860
10-777 -992
1,160.00
DEMO & SALVAGE HOCKEY RINK 00001585 245102
10-777 -991
9,530.00
338994 91912010
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
146.50
244744
605904
303.00
245065
00772297
223.85
245066
605853
128.75
245153
606689
6,777.75
245154
606694
486.00
245155
607150
8,065.85
338995 91912010
103331 TILSNER, DONNA
258.75
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244861
090110
258.75
338996 9/9/2010
123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL
106.25
8/17/10 COUNCIL MTG MINUTES 244862
M17909
106.25
338997 9/9/2010
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
81.13
TIPS, NOZZLES, WIRE CONDUIT 00001389 244785
319198
40.80
WELDING TANKS 245195
407796
121.93
338998 9/912010
103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION
417.88
DIP SWITCHES 00001467 245103
0000044646
417.88
338999 919120"
123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT
5101.4413
5421.6102
1647.6103
47069.6710
5862.5515
5421.5514
5421.5514
5862.5515
5862.5514
5862.5514
1600.6107
1120.6103
1553.6580
5630.6406
1330.6215
ART WORK SOLD
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 23
Business Unit
ART CENTER REVENUES
GRILL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WELDING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VERNON SELLING
GRILL
GRILL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register
Page - 24
9/9/2010
—9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
149.60
FITNESS FOR DUTY
245196
101698701
1470.6175
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
149.60
339000
9/9/2010
101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO.
240.00
DOOR LOUVERS
245197
409362
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
240.00
339001
9/912010
103048 U.S. BANK
1,000.00
TRUSTEE FEE
244863
2691189
3201.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY HALL DS REVENUES
1,000.00
339002
9/912010
120661 UNITED STATES TREASURY
848.49
FORM 8038 -T 41 -6005118
245198
090310
3101.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES
848.49
339003
9/9/2010
127215 UPPER MIDWEST CHAPTER - NATAS
50.00
MEMBERSHIP - MARTY DOLL
245199
0
2210.6105
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
COMMUNICATIONS '
50.00
339004
9/9/2010
103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE
9.49
SHIPPING CHARGES
245067
090110
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
11.85
245068
090210
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
21.34
339006
9/9/2010
100668 URS CORPORATION
14,700.00
LANDSCAPING
245069
4273654
01364.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -364 PROMENADE PHASE 2
14,700.00
339006
9/9/2010
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
3,358.05
WATER SERVICE REPAIRS
00001540 245070
15733
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
3,358.05
339007
919/2010
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
94.35
TUMBLERS
245071
169678 -02
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
643.53
LIQUOR BAGS
00007513 245072
170561 -00
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
11.41
BOX CUTTERS
245073
170561 -01
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
749.29
339008
9/9/2010
116869 VANCE BROTHERS INC.
252.53
BILLY GOAT WIRE WHEELS
00005030 244786
18960
4091.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE
252.53
R55CKREG LOG20000
244745
0029092 -IN
CITY OF EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
162.00
244897
0029091 -IN
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
171.13
244957
0029094 -IN
9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
339009
919/2010
244959
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
339017 9191201P 117482 WINECONNECTINC.
108.81
245201
2451875284 5311.6188
TELEPHONE
339014
9/9/2010
108.81
101076 WEIGLE, SUE
339010
9/9/2010
GOLF PRIZES 244864 090210 1628.4392.02
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
200.00
122.93
KEY LOCKS, LOCKOUT TAGS 00001342 245074
255101 5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
122.93
339011
9/9/2010
119464 VINOCOPIA
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 25
Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
DISTRIBUTION
146.50
244745
0029092 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
162.00
244897
0029091 -IN
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
171.13
244957
0029094 -IN
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,665.50
244958
0029093 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
492.50
244959
0029243 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
POOL CONCESSIONS
ART CENTER REVENUES
SENIOR CITIZENS
508.40 244898 250367 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE -YORK SELLING
785.20 244899 250366 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
592.25 244960 250365 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,885.85
339016 919/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
64.24
244746
2,637.63
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
339012
919/2010
244961
120627 VISTAR CORPORATION
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
166.90
CONCESSION PRODUCT 244700 26943132 5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
166.90
138.24
245157
339013
9/9/2010
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
124743 WALSTED, KRISTEN
6,497.28
110.50
ART WORK SOLD 244998 083110 5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
339017 9191201P 117482 WINECONNECTINC.
110.50
339014
9/9/2010
101076 WEIGLE, SUE
200.00
GOLF PRIZES 244864 090210 1628.4392.02
SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE
200.00
339016
91912010
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
POOL CONCESSIONS
ART CENTER REVENUES
SENIOR CITIZENS
508.40 244898 250367 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE -YORK SELLING
785.20 244899 250366 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
592.25 244960 250365 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,885.85
339016 919/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
64.24
244746
329896
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5,462.79
244961
330560
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
832.01
245156
330559
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
138.24
245157
330558
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
BOTH ST SELLING
6,497.28
339017 9191201P 117482 WINECONNECTINC.
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49
Council Check Register Page - 26
9/9/2010 -9/9/2010
Check # Date
339019 91912010
339020 91912010
Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
159.24 WEB - SEPT 2010 245075 624
159.24
231.60
12.71 -
57.28-
19,455.22
2,478.31
45.08
20.30 -
12.00-
2,353.68
2,177.51
55.95
1,227.90
2,523.10
3,442.76
4,333.82
73.32
26.88
40.00 -
64.97-
39.80-
12.75-
780.00
38,945.32
3,197.75
2,747.30
128.80
1,349.80
96.00
165.60
1,392.37
1,200.00
60.00
5,815.50
2,818.28
408.00
1,712.05
124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
244747 448157
244748 808666
244749 808663
244900 450258
244901 450260
244902 450259
244903 808123
244904 808877
244962 450256
244963 450257
244964 448156
244965 448155
244966 450255
244967 451115
244968 450252
244969 450253
244970 446388
244971 808861
244972 808673
244973 807074
244974 808746
245158 451116
124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER
244750 651141
244751 650769
244752 650770
244753 650751
244975 BRAEMAR GC
244976 650054
244977 650514
244978 651033
244979 650515
244980 651742
244981 650752
245159 653785
245160 653559
Account No
5842.6406
5842.5513
5822.5513
5842.5513
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5515
5842.5512
5842.5513
5822.5512
5822.5513
5862.5515
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5512
5662.5515
5862.5515
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5862.5515
5842.5513
5862.5514
5862.5514
5862.5515
5842.5514
5421.5514
5430.5514
5822.5514
5822.5514
5822.5515
5842.5514
5842.5514
5842.5514
5822.5514
Subledger Account Description
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
GRILL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
339021 91912010
339022 9/912010
339024 919/2010
Amount Supplier/ Explanation
21, 091.45
101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
263.68 MINI GOLF BALLS
263.68
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/9/2010 - 9/912010
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
00002370 244865 247828 5630.6406
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
1,275.40
1,275.40
101726 XCEL ENERGY
68.63 51- 9608462 -5
216.68 51- 5938955 -6
2,946.80 51- 9011854 -4
22.16 51- 6050184 -2
79.86 51- 9422326 -6
139.91 51- 9337452 -8
161.83 51- 8987646 -8
24.95 51- 8976004 -9
22.75 51- 8976004 -9
5,947.61 51-4827232-6
166.13 51 -6229265 -9
2,126.96 51- 6229265 -9
34.24 51- 8102668 -0
840.18 51- 6046826-0
1,273.42 51- 6223269 -1
58.27 51- 6692497 -0
264.96 51- 9251919 -0
1,935.52 51- 5107681 -4
2,533.84 51- 5547446 -1
21.69 51- 6541084 -2
38.49 51- 6892224 -5
344.63 51- 8324712 -5
78.29 51- 8526048 -8
37.57 51- 8997917 -7
55.91 51 -4420190 -3
11,369.15 51- 9603061 -0
30,211.27 51 -4621797 -2
685.17 51- 5634814 -2
5,204.85 51- 4966303 -6
3,729.89 51- 4159265 -8
1,141.36 51- 5847121 -5
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 27
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
244905 253637 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
244701
251173653
5921.6185
LIGHT & POWER
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
244702
251461937
4086.6185
LIGHT & POWER
AQUATIC WEEDS
244703
250972657
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
244704.
250927069
4086.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
244705
251161937
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
244706
251160579
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244707
251151930
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244708
25097665
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244709
251154669
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244710
251257531
5311.6185
LIGHT & POWER
POOL OPERATION
244711
251292022
1481.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK FIRE STATION
244711
251292022
1470.6185
LIGHT & POWER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
244712
251313200
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244713
251460134
5422.6185
LIGHT & POWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
244714
250927220
5210.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
244715
250937759
1460.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
244716
250986173
5650.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PROMENADE
244717
250901909
5111.6185
LIGHT & POWER
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
244718
250915316
1628.6185
LIGHT & POWER
SENIOR CITIZENS
244719
250934481
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
244720
250943441
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244721
250962442
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244722
250964754
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
244723
250972827
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244724
250887547
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244725
250983889
1552.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
244726
251264220
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
244787
251452763
5934.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STORM LIFT STATION MAINT
244788
251439575
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
245104
250884007
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
245105
251779735
114.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TANKS TOWERS & R' 'OIR
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/9/2010
—9/9/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger
Account Description
18,924.31
51- 4888627 -1
245106
251760584
5511.6185
LIGHT & POWER
90,707.28
339026
9/9/2010
119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC.
9,267.26
FUEL 00001010
244866
995965
1553.6581
GASOLINE
9,267.26
339026
91912010
118994 ZAMORA, DAWN
61.75
ART WORK SOLD
244999
083110
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
61.75
339027
9/912010
127218 ZELLA, ROBERT
46.24
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
245200
083110
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
46.24
339028
9/9/2010
101091 ZIEGLER INC
48.37
HOSE, COUPLINGS 00001416
245076
PC001224633
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
48.37
339029
9/9/2010
119168 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
3,264.29
PREMIUM
245080
66199 -8/10
9900.2033.16
LTD - 99
3,264.29
339030
9/912010
126270 HARTFORD
5,077.19
PREMIUM
245091
4995498 -5
9900.2033.05
LIFE INSURANCE - 99
5,077.19
1,279,012.58
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total
1,279,012.58
Total Payments
1,279,012.58
9/9/2010 7:41:49
Page - 28
Business Unit
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ART CENTER REVENUES
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PAYROLL CLEARING
PAYROLL CLEARING_
R55CKSUM LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Summary
9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010
Company
Amount
01000
GENERAL FUND
179,634.07
02200
COMMUNICATIONS FUND
246.96
03100
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND
5,848.49
03200
CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE
1,000.00
04000
WORKING CAPITAL FUND
85,877.01
04200
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
1,269.68
05100
ART CENTER FUND
4,181.42
05200
GOLF DOME FUND
1,273.42
05300
AQUATIC CENTER FUND
7,514.78
05400
GOLF COURSE FUND
9,233.48
05500
ICE ARENA FUND
257,416.08
05600
EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
18,366.49
05800
LIQUOR FUND
270,315.66
05900
UTILITY FUND
417,286.14
05930
STORM SEWER FUND
3,311.24
07400
PSTF AGENCY FUND
7,896.18
09900
PAYROLL FUND
8,341.48
Report Totals 1,279,012.58
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing polici s nd
procedures date 17 � 6v
C
9/9/2010 7:42:43
Page- 1
R55CKREG LOG20000
41.78
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
CITY OF EDINA
101253
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Council Check Register
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245401
101254
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
339045
9/16/2010
69.00
102971. ACE ICE COMPANY
245428
101258
5430.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
62.80
245333
562741 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
15.20
245334
562743 5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC.
28.80
245335
0724542 5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
1,747.20
42.40
7108
245542
0724544 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
14920
LIGHT POLE REMOVAL
00002157 245430
7096
5620.6180
339046
911612010
100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC.
2,871.40
213.14
SCOREBOARD REPAIRS
245269
33870 -14 1600.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES
#894
213.14
339047
9116/2010
RECYCLING
100576 ALL SAFE INC.
2269198
5952.6183
RECYCLING CHARGES
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page- 1
Business Unit
TUKR JtLL11Vla
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
41.78
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245400
101253
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
116.60
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245401
101254
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
60.92
CABINET
00005038 245402
101322
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
69.00
EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE
245428
101258
5430.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
288.30
339048
9/1612010
120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC.
1,747.20
OUTDOOR LIGHT POLES ELECTRICWD02159 245429
7108
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,124.20
LIGHT POLE REMOVAL
00002157 245430
7096
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,871.40
339049
9/16/2010
100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES
#894
37,683.00
RECYCLING
245505
2269198
5952.6183
RECYCLING CHARGES
RECYCLING
37,683.00
339050
9/16/2010
103357 ALPHA VIDEO &'AUDIO INC.
24.05
LIGHT SOCKET ASSEMBLY
245202
SVCINV11809
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
24.05
339051
9/1612010
100666 AMSAN
5.58
CLEANING SUPPLIES
00001481 245203
229631726
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
5.58
339052
911612010
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
1,047.97
FOOD
245431
1399170
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
6.75
ONIONS
245432
1416205
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
1,598.66
FOOD
245433
1417841
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
2,653.38
339063
9/16/2010
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check.Register Page - 2
9/16/2010 -9/1612010
9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
190.37
TRASH PULP
245506
1- 146354 -9/10
7411.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
190.37
339064
911612010
100266 AT &T MOBILITY
44.91
245434
870517029X09021
. 5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
0
44.91
339055
9/16/2010
127226 ATHLETIC SYSTEMS
3,120.00
RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT 00001262
245204
110
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
3,690.00
RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT 00001501
245205
111
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
6,810.00
339056
9/16/2010
102120 ATOL, ROBERT
140.00
CLOTHING PURCHASE
245435
090810
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
140.00
339067
9116/2010
126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA
1,350.00
REMOVE/INSTALL RADAR UNITS
245436
3356
421400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE EQUIPMENT
1,350.00
339068
9/1612010
104346 BARCLAY AUDIO
553.64
THEATER LIGHTING REPAIR 00002142
245438
072610
5620.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
553.64
339059
9116/2010
102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
714.73
BATTERIES 00005143
245437
4553
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
714.73
339060
9116/2010
101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION
1,111.65
245336
54677600
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
324.35
245337
54680300
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
140.55
245338
- 54677400
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
452.30
245339
54677200
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
186.05
245340
54680100
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
222.20
245341
54677300
5822:5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
129.05
245342
54677500
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
155.07
245343
84142400
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
241.46
245344
84142500
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
2,962.68
339061
9/16/2010
101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9114/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 3
9/16/2010
- 9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
41.07
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
OOOMARCH245439
033110
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
50.40
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
OOOAPRIL 245440
043010
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
42.80-
PAID IN ERROR
245441
FEB MILEAGE
2210.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
85.33
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
245442
090910
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
134.00
339062
9/16/2010
119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE
94.34
TOILET SERVICE
00001607 245206
22572
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
94.34
339063
9/16/2010
122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
50.20
MAILING LABELS
00001437 245270
62418
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
50.20
339064
9116/2010
106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
1,671.10
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003788 245507
87179945
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
120.20
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003788 245508
87180397
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,791.30
339065
9/16/2010
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
190.90
ALTERNATOR
00005110 245403
440138
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
122.84
CAP, ELEMENT, O-RING KIT
00005113 245443
440658
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
313.74
339066
9/1612010
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
1,195.00
MATERIALS TESTING
245509
324306
5500.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
1,195.00
339067
9/16/2010
115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING
192.92
FRAMING
245510
020000412
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
192.92
339068
9/16/2010
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
2,224.05
245345
12401
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
23.70
245346
12394
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
796.55
245543
12400
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,044.30
339069
9116/2010
116663 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
266.00
245347
87564
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
310.00
245348
87565
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
576.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 4
9/16/2010
—9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
339070
9/16/2010
100681 CATCO
67.42
PURGE VALVE KIT
00005142 245404
3 -94363
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
67.42
339071
9116/2010
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
59.17
TOUGHBOOK STYLUS
00004345 245577
THH1276
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
29.58
TOUGHBOOK STYLUS
00004345 245578
TGF9686
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
88.75
339072
9116/2010
123998 CELEBRATION BRASS - USE 121162
150.00
PERFORMANCE 6/22/09
213805
061209
5631.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
150.00
339073
9/16/2010
112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
12.82
5590919 -6
245511
5590919 -6 -8110
7413.6582
FUEL OIL
PSTF FIRE TOWER
12.82
339074
9/16/2010
127227 CFA SOFTWARE INC.
2,000.00
CFA INTERFACE PROGRAM
00001300 245271
10943
1553.6160
DATA PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,000.00
339076
9/16/2010
100686 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
100.00
EP ENTERTAINMENT 10/2/09
222774
101609
5621.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
100.00
339076
9/1612010
100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD
395.19
% XCEL BILL
00001703 245272
4574
5932.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
395.19
339077
9/16/2010
127233 CITY OF ST MICHAEL
50.00
CONFERENCE FEE (2)
245405
OCT 7
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
50.00
339078
9/16/2010
114548 CIZEK, DARIN
46.74
UNIFORM PURCHASE
245444
090910
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
46.74
339079
9/16/2010
120972 CMMG INC.
23.50
P90 SCREWS
00003133 245207
12948
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
23.50
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 5
9/16/2010
— 9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier! Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
339080
911612010
120747 CMS
150.00
DRUG TESTING
245208
082010532294
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
150.00
339081
911612010
101704 COOK, BARBARA
901.97
PROGRAM DIRECTOR
245209
10 -1547
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
901.97
339082
9116/2010
101916 COUNTRY FLAGS
160.31
FLAGS
00003794 245512
5055
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
160.31
339083
9/1612010
100699 CULLIGAN!BOTTLED WATER
}'
64.77
114 - 09855685 -4 WATER
245513
1309760
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY-
-
64.77
339084
9/16/2010
127231 CURTI, JULIE
140.00
PROGRAM REFUND
245406-
.090810
1600.4390.52
REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
140.00
339085
911612010
121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP
432.32
REMOTE READERS
00001706 245445
6560713
5916.6406
_- GENERAL SUPPLIES
METER READING
432.32
339086
9116/2010
104020 DALCO
15,237.43
FLOOR SCRUBBER
00005983 245273
2233898
421553.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT
15,237.43
339087
9116/2010
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
1,777.40.
245349
567948
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
21.50
245544
567875
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,560.45
245545
567874
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,302.45
245546
567801
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5,661.80
339088
9/16/2010
102465 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES
INC
4.04
VALVE
00005139 245274
4- 125474
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4.04
339089
9/16/2010
118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY
59.99
ACCT 622833 WATER
245446
7069191
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
59.99
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
_ Page - 6
9/16/2010
-9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
339090
9/16/2010
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
145.85
METRIC SET
00001173 245447
501017
1553.6556
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
145.85
339091
9116/2010
122135 DENFELD; SCOTT
145.33
DVD RECORDER
245407
090910
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
..COMMUNICATIONS
145.33
339092
911612010
100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY
36.36
BAKERY
245448
343382
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
68.96
BAKERY
245449
- 343494
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
101.89
BAKERY
245450
343622
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
35.46
BAKERY
245451
343805
5421.5510
COST OF.GOODS SOLD
GRILL
242.67
339093
9/1612010
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC.
22.75
245275
110312148 -8/10
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
22.75
245275
`110312148 -8/10
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK 0CCUPANCY
22.75
245275
110312148 -8/10
5861.6188
TELEPHONE-
VERNON OCCUPANCY.
115.40
110311867
245452
110311867 -8/10
5621.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
- EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
183.65
339094
9/16/2010
123162 DISH NETWORK
38.49
8255 70 708 1422839
245514
090410
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
38.49
339095
9/16/2010
101766 DISPLAY SALES
1,112.15
FLAGS
00002377 245276
INVO074998 -
5650.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROMENADE
1,112.15
339096
9116/2010
124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO.
17.26
LUBE
00001584 245277
07467500.'
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
17.26
339097
9/1612010
123189- EDINA LIQUOR
222.75
WINE
245453
115- 090310
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
'GRILL
222.75
339098 911612010 101630 EDINA'PUBLIC SCHOOLS
132.00 GYM USE PERMIT #37678 245408 9947 1600.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
132.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
STAFF PHOTOS
08326063 245456
T2- 293211
CITY OF EDINA
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
81.28
Council Check Register
339105 9/1612010
127236 FELDMAN, JULIE
9/16/2010
-9/16/2010 .
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
339099
911612010
101407 EGAN, MATT
339106 9/1612010
126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
391.00
UNIFORM PURCHASE
245278
090910
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
391.00
397.20
REPAIR OF METROTECH
00001665 245280
S01272007.002
5913.6180
339100
9116/2010
521.59
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
00001665 245281
S01272266.001
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
126.77
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003713 245515
1305770
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
339107 9/16/2010
126.77
2,447.43
339101
9/16/2010
01E1584462
102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT
2,447.46
FORKLIFT FOR PW
00001205 245282
01 E1584462
157.37
AUDIO VISUAL CART
00001582 245409
174635
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01E1584462
421305.6710
157.37
STREET EQUIPMENT
9,789.75
339102
911612010
104991 EVANS, CONNIE
24.44
REIMBURSEMENT
245454
090810
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
102.42
REIMBURSEMENT
245454
090810
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
126.86
339103
9/16/2010
122549 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY
518.99
FOOD
245455
7576317
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
518.99
339104
9/16/2010
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 7
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GRILL
GRILL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
81.28
STAFF PHOTOS
08326063 245456
T2- 293211
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
81.28
339105 9/1612010
127236 FELDMAN, JULIE
125.00
RASMUSSEN PHOTO REFUND
245516
090910
5601.4555
CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK
EB /CL REVENUES
125.00
339106 9/1612010
126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
50.00
LOCATOR REPAIR
00001545 245279
S01270989.001
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
397.20
REPAIR OF METROTECH
00001665 245280
S01272007.002
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
521.59
CS REPAIR PARTS
00001665 245281
S01272266.001
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
968.79
339107 9/16/2010
122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC.
2,447.43
FORKLIFT FOR PW
00001205 245282
01E1584462
421650.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT
2,447.46
FORKLIFT FOR PW
00001205 245282
01 E1584462
5900.1735
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
4,894.86
FORKLIFT FOR PW
00001205 245282
01E1584462
421305.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
STREET EQUIPMENT
9,789.75
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9114/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 8
9/16/2010
- 9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
339108
9/1612010
100764 G & K SERVICES
88.13
245457
083110
5511.6201
LAUNDRY
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
109.27
245457
083110
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
195.30
245457
083110
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
DISTRIBUTION
315.15
245457
083110
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
499.26
245457
083110
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
618.55
245457
083110
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
715.00
245457
083110
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,540.66
339109
9/16/2010
123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE
123.73
MUMS
00006314 245458
297842
5422.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
123.73
339110
911612010
127232 GASTON- CARRERE, BRUNNO
75.08
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
245410
090710
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
75.08
339111
9/16/2010
100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA
211.79
PARTS
245411
083110
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,116.29
PARTS
245411
083110
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,328.08
339112
9/16/2010
126936 GOLF SCORECARDS INC.
903.70
SCORECARDS
00006098 245459
31100
5410.6575
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
903.70
339113
911612010
101103 GRAINGER
243.69
SHOP SUPPLIES
00001581 245210
9334874303
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
535.74
FILTER, CARTRIDGES
00005036 245283
9335867967
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
553.66
GLOVES
00006436 245460
9322305575
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
57.19
DISPLAY RACK
00001671 245461
9340652875
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,390.28
339114
9/16/2010
124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL
54.95
ALIGNMENT
00005106 245284
16151
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
54.95
339116
9/1612010
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
352.50
245547
121962
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
352.50
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF_EDINA
Council Check Register
9116/2010 — 9/16/2010
Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
339116 911612010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE
331.43• ,v PALLET JACK 245285 090810 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES.
331.43 =
339117 911612010 121536 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 9
Business Unit
VERNON OCCUPANCY
1,750.00 ACTIVITY GUIDE DESIGN 245412- 00100813 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS -
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
ASSESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
LEGAL SERVICES
EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
166.29 SIGNAGE 00001532 245287 388022 -001 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
166.29
338124 9/16/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI
832.02 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005183 245464 88397 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
832.02
339126 9/16/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC.
2,009.00 245350 533799 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,009.00
1,750.00
339118
9116/2010
120227 HARTSHORN,BOB
561.99
REIMBURSE FOR SUPPLIES
245413
090210
1628.4392.03
SENIOR SOFTBALL
561.99
339119
911612010
123146 HAUTH.ENTERPRISES .
575.00
PETTING ZOO - BARNYARD BOOGIE
245211
090810
1600.4390.49
BARNYARD BOOGIE
575.00
339120
911612010
105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION,
104.23
TRANSACTION PROCESSING
245462
21086234
1190.6105.
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
156.00
SILS /CAL SUPPORT
245463
21086235
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
260.23
339121
9H6/2010
101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI
741.47
AUG 2010'BOOKING FEES
245286
3218
1195.6170
COURT CHARGES
741.47
339122
911612010
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
944.78
LAPTOP FOR PW 00004360
245212
48181301
421553.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
830.42
PC & LCD FOR:INTERN 00004361
245213
48204205
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
239.40
PRINTER PART FOR SR CTR 00004351
245579
47950399
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
2,014.60
339123
911612010
101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES' INC.
SENIOR CITIZENS -
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
ASSESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
LEGAL SERVICES
EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
166.29 SIGNAGE 00001532 245287 388022 -001 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
166.29
338124 9/16/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI
832.02 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005183 245464 88397 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
832.02
339126 9/16/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC.
2,009.00 245350 533799 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,009.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
339126 9/16/2010
339127 9/16/2010
Subledger Account Description
CHEMICALS
REPAIR PARTS
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 10
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
339128- 911612010
100828 JERRY S FOODS
CITY OF EDINA -
Council Check Register
1.95
9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
COST OF GOODS SOLD
100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
5.40
448.64
ACID FOR POOL 00002162 245465
10082437 5620.6545
448.64
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
ELECTION
14.40
105894 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTENANCE I
245214
97.79 .
ELEMENTS 00005101 245288
25143 1553.6530
97.79
19.38
Subledger Account Description
CHEMICALS
REPAIR PARTS
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 10
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH PARK
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
339128- 911612010
100828 JERRY S FOODS
1.95
245214
083110
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
5.40
245214
083110
1180.6406
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
ELECTION
14.40
245214
083110
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
19.38
245214
083110
4075.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
VANVALKENBURG
20.20
245214
083110
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
21.88
245214
083110
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
26.69
245214
083110
1400.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
57.87
EDINA ART CENTER
245215
081810
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
167.77
339129 9/16/2010
100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
40.09-
245216
083110
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1.90
245216
083110
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
5.11
-
.245216.
083110 _
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
.5.96
245216
r 083110
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
6.05
-
245216
083110
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
12.44
245216
083110
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
14.80
245216
083110
1401.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
25.34
245216
083116
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
32.00
245216
083110
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
34.77
245216 "
083110 -
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
49.56.
245216
083110
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
66.80
245216
083110
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
74.34
245216
083110
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE
- 106.34"
.
245216
083110
5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
149:74
245216
083110
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
264.90
245216
083110
5913.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES.
DISTRIBUTION
522.01
245216
083110
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES,
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
537.76
245216
083110
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
846.04
245216
083110
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,717.77
c;
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 11
9116/2010
-9/16/2010
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit .
339130 9/16/2010
102146 JESSEN PRESS
368.71
TIME CARDS
245517
24102
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FINANCE
368.71
339131 9/16/2010
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
1,667.80
245351
1423541
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
403.55
245466
1428309
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
6,858.65
245548
1423549
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
8,930.00
339132 9/16/2010
124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO
39.48
WEED SPRAYER
00001504 245217
55650945
1643.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
299.25
FUNGICIDE
00006307 245467
55424145
5431.6545
CHEMICALS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
338.73
339134 9116/2010
100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
1,551.01
245352
1905238
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,075.12
245353
1905236
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
315.36
245354
1905232
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,126.48
245355
1905237
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1.12
245356
- 1905225
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
22.11
245357
1905234
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
667.04
245358
1905233
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,606.92
245359
1905235
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,667.68
245360
1897092
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
100.00-
245361
470562
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
100.00-
245362
470564
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
100.00-
245363
470563
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
516.26
245549
1905222
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
657.27
245550
1905221
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
464.83
245551
1905220
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
864.65
245552
1905224
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
170.31
245553
1905223
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
2,668.08
245554
1905230
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1;131.13
245555
1905227
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,406.90
245556
1905228
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,714.68
245557
1905231
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,834.02
245558
1905229
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
112.12
245559
1905226
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
27,273.09
339136 9/16!'
100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 12
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2.68
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5112.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER POTTERY
8.99
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5110.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17.72
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
28.95
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5110.6235
POSTAGE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
37.84
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5125.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
64.84
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
145.77
PETTY CASH
245289
090810
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
306.79
339136 9116/2010
111018 KEEPRS INC.
99.87
UNIFORMS
00003771 245518
146294 -03
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
539.96
UNIFORMS
00003774 245519
146920
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
691.94
UNIFORMS
00003782 245520
146603 -01
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
173.14
UNIFORMS
00003771 245521
146294 -02
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
147.96
UNIFORMS
00003780 245522
147290
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.97
UNIFORMS
00003781 245523
147347
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
199.99
UNIFORMS
00003781 245524
147347 -01
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,953.83
339137 9/16/2010
101340 KOCHENASH, RICK
450.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
208250
032509
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
450.00
339138 9/16/2010
105887 KOESSLER, JOE
168.00
AUG 2010 SERVICE
245290
090110
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
168.00
339139 9116/2010
101936 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC.
394.79
PRO LASER III SERVICE
245218
424982
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
394.79
339140 9/1612010
126929 LAKE IMPROVEMENT CONSULTING LL
443.75
POND TREATMENT
245468
1014
5422.6275
COURSE BEAUTIFICATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
443.75
339141 9/16/2010
127146 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC.
113.37
PLAYGROUND PARTS
00001505 245219
M77258
1647.6530
REPAIR PARTS
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
113.37
339142 9/16/2010
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
162.39
TOOLS
00001503 245220
9538966
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
60.01
WASHERS, TERMINALS
60005037 245291
9552211
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
9/16/2010
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT
245221
090810
1554.6230
9/16/2010 -9/16/2010
51.10
Check #
Date Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
419.35
LOCK NUTS, PINS, FITTINGS
00005037 245292
9552210 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
115.29
CONNECTORS, METAL SCREWS
00001664 245293
9556884 1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92.83
WASHERS
00005562 245414
9252189 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
849.87
9/16/2010
101371 MACHOLDA, ED
339143
9/1612010
100864 LEITNER COMPANY
87.50
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
245295
2,895.41
SAND
245469
090110BRAEMAR 5422.6517
SAND GRAVEL 8 ROCK
2,895.41
339149
9/16/2010
339144
911612010
102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE
925.00
ACTIVITY DIRECTORY DESIGN
245415
#4 1600.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
925.00
376.54
CARPET CLEANING
245527
W28215
339145
911612010
100858 LOGIS
850.03
1,147.00
339160
245294
32650 1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
2,565.50
245294
32650 1120.6160
DATA PROCESSING
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
2,893.00
091010
245294
32650 1495.6160
DATA PROCESSING
2,983.00
245294
32650 1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
5,023.00
245294
32650 5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
5,086.00
245294
32650 1190.6160
DATA PROCESSING
5,883.50
245294
32650 1160.6160
DATA PROCESSING
339146
9/16/2010
126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS
51.10
CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT
245221
090810
1554.6230
51.10
339147
911612010
103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC.
424.94
DISINFECTANT CLEANERS 00003797
245525
2396
1470.6511
424.94
339148
9/16/2010
101371 MACHOLDA, ED
87.50
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
245295
090810
1600.6107
87.50
339149
9/16/2010
114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC.
473.49
JANITORIAL SERVICE
245526
C005065
7411.6103
376.54
CARPET CLEANING
245527
W28215
7411.6103
850.03
339160
9/1612010
127236 MARTIN, MYRON
115.86
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
245528
091010
5900.2015
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 13
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
STREET NAME SIGNS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
ADMINISTRATION
INSPECTIONS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
GENERAL (BILLING)
ASSESSING
FINANCE
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CUSTOMER REFUND
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
PSTF OCCUPANCY
PSTF OCCUPANCY
UTILITY BALANCE --ET
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/1612010 — 9/16/2010
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 14
Business Unit
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
115.86
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PONDS & LAKES
339151
911612010
100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER
1,200.00
PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS
245416
7057
1550.6121
1,200.00
339152
9116/2010
126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN
54.00
COSTUME FOR "IN EDINA"
245417
090910
2210.6406
54.00
339153
9/16/2010
106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
2,898.00
COMMONWEAL THEATRE TRIP
245296
090310
1628.6103.07
2,898.00
339164
9/1612010
101987 MENARDS
179.02
FOUNTAIN REPAIR PARTS
00001494
245222
14502
1647.6530
19.23
BROOM
00002376
245297
16674
5630.6406
198.25
339155
9116/2010
100890 MIDWEST AQUA CARE
1,690.00
LAKE DYE TREATMENT
00001613
245418
ARROWHEAD8 /10
4086.6103
4,839.00
WEED & ALGAE TREATMENTS
00001612
245419
080810
4086.6103
4,306.00
WEED & ALGAE TREATMENTS
00001261
245420
INDIANHEAD8 /10
4086.6103
2,490.00
WEED & ALGAE TREATMENT
00001611
245421
MELODY8 /10
5933.6103
13,325.00
339156
911612010
102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES
490.02
SOAP
00001502.245298
176813
1552.6406
490.02
339157
9116/2010
101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC
OF REAL
96.00
MLS ACCESS FEE
245470
1627301
1190.6105
96.00
339158
9/16/2010
103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
17,877.51
WATER PURCHASE
245223
090210
5913.6601
17,877.51
339159
9/1612010
102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN
COMPANY
19.95
CO2
245471
R108100121
5421.6406
37.44
CO2
245529
R108100254
7413.6545
57.39
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 14
Business Unit
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PONDS & LAKES
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL
CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 15
9/16/2010
—9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
339160
9/1612010-
102770- MINNESOTA CASTERS INC.
123.75
CASTERS, YOKES 00001424 245299,
7071
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
123.75
339161
9/16/2010
120051 MINNESOTA FIRE.CHIEF MAGAZINE
80.00
DIRECTORY LISTING 245530
60048
7410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION.
80.00
339162
911612010
105430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY
2,231.36
ARMS 00005981 245300
M58824
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,231.36
339163
9/1612010
126997 MISSION ELECTRIC LLC
823:00
LIGHT FIXTURES 00008020 245472
082710
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES -
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
823.00
339164
911612010
121491 MORRIE'S PARTS &SERVICE GROUP
265.67
SENSORS 00001426 245473
483905F6W
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
265.67
339166
9116/2010
102396 MOSE, WILLIAM
25.50
WRAP UP MEETING 245531
091310
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
25.50
339166
9116/2010
100912 MOTOROLA INC.
2,118.39
SERVICE AGREEMENT 245474
78150856
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,118.39
339167
9/16/2010
106729 MOWER COUNTY -
-
485.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 245301
090710
1000.2055
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
485.00
339168
911612010
105007 NU- TELECOM
557.72
PSAP MONTHLY SERVICE 245224
80251977
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
557.72
339169
9/1612010
105575 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO. INC
166.08
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422
23998
1600.6575
PRINTING
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
180.38
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422
23998
5110.6575
PRINTING
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
180.38
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422
23998
5510.6575 -
PRINTING
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
180.38
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422
23998
1628.6575
PRINTING
SENIOR CITIZENS
R55CKREG LOG20000
245364
8273587 -IN
CITY OF EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,125.93
245365
8273581 -IN
Council Check Register
COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,051.75
245366
8273572 -IN
9/16/2010
-9/1612010
VERNON SELLING
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
100674 PENHALL COMPANY
180.38
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY
245422
23998
5621.6575
PRINTING
00001531 245304
53811
180.38
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY
245422
23998
5631.6575
PRINTING
225.47
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY
245422
23998
1629.6575
PRINTING
360.76
2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY
245422
23998
5410.6575
PRINTING
BARNYARD BOOGIE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
1,654.21
339170
9116/2010
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
42.79
THERMAL ROLLS, SPRAY. MOUNT
00006034 245475 -
1251199506
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
29.03
GOLF PENCILS
00002365 245476 ..
531229018001
5631.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
71.82
339171
9/16/2010
100936 OLSEN.COMPANIES
70.87
CHAIN & CLEVIS HOOKS
00005135 245302
. 607606
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
21.70
CABLE
00002371 245303
607394
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92.57
339172
9/16/2010
100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC.
134.23
COOKIES
245477
80155671
5421.5510
COST -OF GOODS SOLD
134.23
339173
9/16/2010
124647 PAIGE CONSTRUCTION INC.
300.00
VARIANCE REFUND
217924"
072209
1140.4361
PLANNING FEES
300.00
339174
911612010. "
100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC
49.60
RACK "
00006093 245478
254261
5440.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
49.00
339176
9/16/2010
100347 PAUSTIS 8: SONS
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 16
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES `
GRILL
PLANNING
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
826.03
245364
8273587 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,125.93
245365
8273581 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,051.75
245366
8273572 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
3,003.71
339176 9/16/2010
100674 PENHALL COMPANY
275.00
SAW CUT
00001531 245304
53811
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
275.00
339177 9/16/2010
127228 PERKINS MEDIA
200.00
BARNYARD BOOGIE 9/18_/10 •
245305
DJ DANCE
1600.4390.49
BARNYARD BOOGIE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
200.00,
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF-EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 17
9/16/2010
-9/16/2010
Check # Date
Amount
'Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No;
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
339178 9/16/2010
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
157.04
245367
2960021
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,010.11
245368
2960020
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
645.60
245369
2960016
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
3,474.82
245370
2960022
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
23.67-
245371
3443719
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
4.84
245372
3443718
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
8.00-
245373
3443715
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
.
98.24
245374
3443717
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
53.12-
245375
3443716
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,685.91
245560
2960019
5842:5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD -WINE
YORK SELLING
802.41
245561
2960017
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,567.36
245562
2960018
5642.5512
COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
343.84
245563
2960015
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
-
1,065.83
245564
2960014
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
10,565.05
339179 ..911612010
100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT
1,257.33
PIPE, GASKETS
00001534 245423,
0055341 -IN
5921.6406 '"
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
1,257.33
339180 9/1612010
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
350.00
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
245225
090810
1628.6235
POSTAGE
SENIOR CITIZENS
350.00
339181 9/1612010
106152 POWERPLAN
128.68
PUMP, SEAL
00001366 245226
P58324
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
128.68
339182 911612010
102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
30.31
FILTERS
00002328 245306
150758
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS.
CENTENNIAL LAKES
59.88
MOWER PART
00002367 245307
150704
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES"
128.52
MOWER PARTS
00002338 245308
151234
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
59.88
MOWER PART
00002367 .245309
152091
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
278.59
339183 9/1612010
100966- -PRINTERS SERVICE INC
.
54.00
BLADE SHARPENING
00008019 245479
249326
5521.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ARENA ICE MAINT
54.00
339184 9116/2010
100971 QUALITY WINE
18.60
245376
353227 -CO
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 18
9/16/2010
-9/16/2010
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
615.20
245377
353226 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,564.80
245378
352804 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,160.24
245379
353313 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
705.75
245380
352805 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,838.80
245381
353228 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
591.20
245382
353229 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
300.47
245383
353315 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
168.80
245384
352806 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,176.14
245385
353314 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
12,140.00
339185 9/16/2010
123898 OWEST
55.92
245227
082810
5911.6186
TELEPHONE
WELL PUMPS
58.62
245227
082810
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
SENIOR CITIZENS
113.66
245227
082810
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
117.32
245227
082810
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
166.05
245227
082810
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
192.33
245227
082810
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
234.92
245227
082810
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
256.41
245227
082810
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
266.59
245227
082810
5932.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL STORM SEWER
2,057.44
245227
082810
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
18.60
651 281 -1355
245310
1355 -9110
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
292.46
612 E24 -8656
245311
8656 -9/10
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
SENIOR CITIZENS
5204
612 E24 -8657
245312
8657 -9/10
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
606.52
612 E01 -0426
245313
0426 -9110
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
606.52
612 E12 -6797
245314
6797 -9/10
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
520.19
612 E01 -8392
245315
8392 -9/10
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
182.29
952 926 -0419
245316
0419 -9/10
1646.6188•
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
52.28
952 926 -0092
245317
0092 -9/10
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
DISTRIBUTION
6,318.88
339186 9/16/2010
117692 R & B CLEANING INC.
2,009.25
RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING
245318
812
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE
2,009.25
339187 9/16/2010
124537 RALPH, ROBERT
25.50
WRAP UP MEETING
245532
091310
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
25.50
339188 9/16/2010
100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING
141.50
URINAL REPAIR 00002376 245424
12378
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
R55CKREG LOG20000
-
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/16/2010
-9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #. Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
141.50
339189
9/1612010
124678 REAL ESTATE COMMUNICATIONS GRO
-
99.00
2010.OFFICE SUMMIT 245533
358 -42855
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
99.00
' 339190
9116/2010
100976 RED WING SHOE STORE
106.21
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 245320
725000001242
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
249.95
SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 245320
725000001242
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1
356.16
339191
911612010
-
100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
156.50
SHOWER REPAIR 00006096 245480
55659
5420.6180"
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
156.50
339192
911612010
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
74.55,
SOFTENER SALT 00003648 245534
00240221
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
74.55"
339193
911612010
114687 ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY BAND
150.00
EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/1/09 225210
112009
5621.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
150.00
339194
9/16/2010
101963 S & S SPECIALISTS
"
961.88
OAK WILT TREATMENTS 245481
43298
5422.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
961.88
339195
9/16/2010
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
113.07
CLEAN PARTS WASHER 00005138 245321
922704734
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
331.06
RECYCLE PARTS CLEANER 245535
51467869
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
444.13
339196
9/16/2010
101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY
58.54
BAKERY 245482
291490
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
58.54
339197
911612010
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
21.36
101= "" "9350 245536
091010
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
, 35.43
101= •"•"9350 245536
091010 -
4075.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
56.79
339198
9116/2010
124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page- 19
Business Unit
ASSESSING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CLUB HOUSE
CLUBHOUSE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OR COURSE & GROUNDS
GRILL
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
VANVALKENBURG
R55CKREG LOG20000
9.25
CITY OF EDINA
339204
9/16/2010
120784 SIGN PRO
Council Check Register
59.32
EDINA 18 SIGN 245425
9/16/2010
- 9/16/2010
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
911612010
252.10
WEED CONTROL SERVICE
00001605 245228
1833
1643.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1.155.12
TEST ALARM & SPRINKLER 00002144 245484
252.10
5620.6250
ALARM SERVICE
1.155.12
339199
9/16/2010
104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF
`'
339206
911612010
127237 SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY
54.75
STICKERS
245322
SH1077
5822.6575
PRINTING
1057
2210.6406
54.75
STICKERS
245322
SH1077
5862.6575
PRINTING
109.51
STICKERS
245322
SH1077
5842.6575
PRINTING
219.01
492.97
STRESS RELIEVERS 245539
, 425618
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
339200.
9/1612010
492.97
119799. SCHIMETZ, SCOTT
339208
9/16/2010
25.50
WRAP UP MEETING
245537
091310
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25.50
.,.
339201
9/16/2010
124114 SCNS SPORTS FOODS
56.40
FOOD
00006344 245485
30768
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
.56.40
339202
9116/2010
104689 ' SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC.
2.655.20.
CUSTOM SIGNAGE
245483
41452
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2;655.20
339203
911612010
116971 'SEVERSON, GAYLE F
9114/2010 9:56:19
Page - 20
Business Unit
GENERAL TURF CARE
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
' EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
GRILL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
9.25 , ELECTION JUDGE .174195 111407 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION
COMMUNICATIONS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COMMUNICATIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
9.25
339204
9/16/2010
120784 SIGN PRO
59.32
EDINA 18 SIGN 245425
4204
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59.32
339206
911612010
106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP
1.155.12
TEST ALARM & SPRINKLER 00002144 245484
73796190
5620.6250
ALARM SERVICE
1.155.12
339206
911612010
127237 SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY
150.00
MONITORS 245538
1057
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
150.00
339207.
9/16/2010
'119716 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC.
492.97
STRESS RELIEVERS 245539
, 425618
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
492.97
339208
9/16/2010
101004 SIPS COMPANIES
COMMUNICATIONS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COMMUNICATIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
120602 TEAGUE, CARY
CITY OF EDINA
5900.1735
9/14/2010 9:56:19
421305.6710
84.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
Council Check Register
090810
Page - 21
84.00
9/16/2010
— 9/16/2010
--
122794 TENNANT SALES AND
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
7,320.83
.28.60
SOLDER 00001668 245323
S2254187.001
5913.6580
WELDING SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER
00005720
28.60
900900546
14,641.65
MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER
00005720
339209
9/16/2010
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC.
339216 9/16/2010
1,868.90
TAX ON INVOICE SM10272 00005974 245229
SM10272TAX
421650.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT
RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT
00001486
1,868.90
10 -777 -993
3,970.00
339210
.9/1612010
339217 9/16/2010
100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC
101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
154.00
188.19
DOOR PARTS 00001257 245230
MN- 541228
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
245488
188.19
339211
911612010
102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS
121.84
LIQUID FERTILIZER 245486
3093 -RGR
5431.6540
FERTILIZER
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
121.84
339212
9116/2010
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
35.00
WIRELESS REPAIR SERVICE 245324
28224
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
35.00
339213
9/1612010
120998 SURLY BREWING CO.
646.00
245386
MVP01503
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
339214 9/16/2010
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
120602 TEAGUE, CARY
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
5900.1735
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS
421305.6710
84.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
245325
090810
84.00
339215 9/1612010
--
122794 TENNANT SALES AND
SERVICE COMP
7,320.83
MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER
00005720
245326
900900546
7,320.83
MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER
00005720
245326
900900546
7,320.83
MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER
00005720
245326
900900546
14,641.65
MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER
00005720
245326
900900546
36,604.14
339216 9/16/2010
113549 TENNIS WEST
3,970.00
RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT
00001486
245231
10 -777 -993
3,970.00
339217 9/16/2010
101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
154.00
245487
00772364
284.90
245488
606923
438.90
1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING
421553.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
421650.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
5900.1735
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS
421305.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT
PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
STREET EQUIPMENT
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL
5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL
R55CKREG LOG20000
513.50
CITY OF EDINA
339223
9/16/2010
Council Check Register
9/16/2010
- 9/1612010
00006326 245491
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
339218
9/16/2010
120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC.
9/1612010
126032 UNI-SELECT USA
283.33
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
245327
2010 -42998
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
083110
1553.6530
283.33
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
245327
2010 -42998
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
283.34
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
245327
2010 -42998
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
850.00
317.57
UNIFORMS
245329
339219
9/16/2010
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES
391.96
UNIFORMS
245329
083110
1400.6203
216.82
COPIER USAGE
245540
159455344
7410.6575
PRINTING
216.82
339226
9/16/2010
103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE
339220
9116/2010
101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC
8.41
SHIPPING CHARGE
00003136 245492
090810
1400.6406
10.45
SPRING 00001421
245328
LC00000714
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
10.45
339227
9/16/2010
101908 US FOODSERVICE INC
339221
911612010
118190 TURFWERKS LLC
681.08
TINES, COLLAR
245489
JI35133
5431.6530
REPAIR PARTS
922.91
ROLLER
245490
SI24599
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,603.99
339222
9/16/2010
123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 22
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
513.50 PRE - EMPLOYMENT TESTS 245426 101700789 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RESERVE PROGRAM
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
513.50
339223
9/16/2010
102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
550.41
SEED
00006326 245491
23869
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
550.41
339224
9/1612010
126032 UNI-SELECT USA
1,090.70
PARTS
245580
083110
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,090.70
339226
9/1612010
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
317.57
UNIFORMS
245329
083110
1419.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
391.96
UNIFORMS
245329
083110
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
709.53
339226
9/16/2010
103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE
8.41
SHIPPING CHARGE
00003136 245492
090810
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8.41
339227
9/16/2010
101908 US FOODSERVICE INC
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
RESERVE PROGRAM
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Council Check Register
Page - 23
9/16/2010
- 9/16/2010
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
30.00
CUST43805514
245493
083110
5421.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GRILL
473.97
CUST43805514
245493
083110
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
4,454.87
CUST 43805514
245493
083110
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
4,958.84
339228
9/16/2010
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
841.04
WRENCHES, CS FITTINGS
00001538 245330
224258
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
841.04
339229
9/16/2010
100050 USPS- HASLER
6,000.00
ACCT #75983
245331
090810
1550.6235
POSTAGE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
6,000.00
339230
9/16/2010
102909 VADNAIS, SCOTT
450.00
GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS
00001615 245494
00080310
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
450.00
339231
9/16/2010
122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC
59.80
OXYGEN
00003649 245427
825387
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
59.80
339232
911612010
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
255.98
CLEANING SUPPLIES
00001587 245232
171779 -00
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
170.82
LIQUOR BAGS
00007512 245541
171924 -00
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
426.80
339233
911612010
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
290.00
GOLF CAR RENTAL
00006097 245495
50923
5423.6216
LEASE LINES
GOLF CARS
47.79
SHIFT CABLE
00006322 245496
50501
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
337.79
339234
911612010
102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
COM
278.00
SPRINKLER REPAIR
00008018 245497
146308
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
278.00
339235
9116/2010
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
322.00
NITRILE GLOVES
00001500 245233
255124
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
86.95
GLOVES, FLASHLIGHTS
00001500 245234
255136
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
10.24-
CREDIT
00001115 245235
255107
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
398.71
339236
9/16/2010
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,270.91
BULBS
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5512
1,270.91
VERNON SELLING
339237
9/16/2010
VERNON SELLING
117074 WEIERKE, DAVID
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
143.96
UNIFORM PURCHASE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
143.96
YORK SELLING
339238
9/16/2010
YORK SELLING
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,098.15
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5421.5514
1,504.75
GRILL
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
2,602.90
5862.5514
339239
9/16/2010
5842.5514
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
YORK SELLING
5842.5514
1,150.67
YORK SELLING
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
7 065.67
5862.5514
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
00001141 245498 15158381 -00 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
245332 090810 1646.6201
245387 250725-00 5862.5513
245565 250722 -00 5842.5513
245388 331284 5862.5513
245566 331283 5842.5513
245567 331282 5822.5513
339240 9/16/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
5,926.50 245389 453065
71.83 245390 453066
1,053.33 245391 453062
1,796.60 245392 450254
10,114.06 245393 453059
1,472.56 245394 453064
198.62- 245395 808891
395.75 245568 454127
6,243.37 245569 453067
26,875.38
339241 9/1612010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER
3,699.43 245396 653764
1,985.60 245397 655125
406.20 245499 653566
502.00 245500 656116
120.00 245570 654532
442.25 245571 656335
3,572.50 245572 656334
3,532.30 245573 656095
1,561.38 245574 653786
100.00 245575 653787
15,921.66
LAUNDRY
9/14/2010 9:56:19
Page - 24
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5642.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
•R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
339242 9/16/2010
CITY OF EDINA .
Council Check Register
9/16/2010 -9/16/2010
Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
2,306.90 245398 253888 5862.5513
1,085.45 245399 253890 5842.5513
171.90 245576 253889 5822.5513
339243 9/16/2010
101726 •XCEL ENERGY
4,611.81
51- 6621207 -1. -
245236
-. 251788625
2,187.60
514013604 -6 ',
-
245237
251827353
1,569.12
..a
5176840050 -6.
245238
252291026
31.26
51- 7567037-0
245239
251802391
28.62
51 -4151897 -6
245240
251752862
932.29
51- 6137136 -8
245241
251780979
1,235.42
51-6979948 -4
245242
251961281
1,644.68
51- 6979948 -4
245242
251961281
2,192.73
51- 6979948 -4
245242
251961281
14,433.53
339244 9/16/2010
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
168.90
AUG USAGE - PARK & REC
00004322
245243
049985369
35.08
AUG USAGE, BLDG /ENG
00004322
245244
049985368
203:98
339245 9/1612010
118028 YAHOO] CUSTODIAN OF
RECORDS
20.44
DISCLOSURE REQUEST
245245
159722
20.44
339246 911612010
119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC.
702.17
GAS
00006403
245502
996109
565.09
GAS
00006403
245503
996111
788.56
DIESEL
00006404
245504
996110
2,055.82
339247 9/16/2010
127234 ZYLKA, DOUGLAS
76.76
CLOTHING PURCHASE
245501
090810
76.76
419,491.72
Grand Total
5913.6185
5913.6185
5921.6185
1321.6185
1646.6185
5430.6185
5821.6185
5861.6185
5841.6185
1550.6151
1550.6151
1400.6103
5431.6581
5424.6406
5431.6581
5422.6406
Subledger;Account Description
COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS`SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER"
LIGHT& POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
9/1412010 9:56:19
Page - 25
Business Unit
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
5071-1 ST SELLING
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GASOLINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
- GASOLINE
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 419,491.72
Total Payments 419,491.72
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
RANGE'
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
R55CKSUM __�20000
CITY �.NA_
Council Check Summary
9/16/2010 = 9/16/2010
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
88,280.13
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
1,671.32
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
13,049.90
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
56,026.71
05100 ART CENTER FUND
995.04
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
34.77
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
24,957.13
05500_ ICE ARENA FUND
2,874.92
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
7,773.71
05800 LIQUOR FUND
135,345.53
05900 UTILITY FUND
46,157.04
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
3,151.78
05950 RECYCLING.FUND
37,683.00
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
1,490.74
Report Totals
419,491.72
We confirm to thenbest of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing poll ies and
procedur"te . �r
lFinaryceZirector
91, -10 9:56:59
Page- 1
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
7/27/10 - 8/25/10
Card Holder Aerchani Account
Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/07/26
$41.69
YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES
MICHAELS #3739
BLOOMINGTON MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/07/29
$39.30
YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES
TARGET 00002600
ST. LOUIS PAR
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/07/29
$10.00
YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES
TARGET 00002600
ST. LOUIS PAR
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/07/29
$185.86
YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES
CUB FOODS #3128
EDINA
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/07/29
$600.00
YOUTH SUMMER PROGRAM
THREE RIVERS ADMINISTR/ 763- 5599000
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/07/30
$552.47
EQUIPMENT LEASE
PAYPAL *BOUNCEONAIR
402 - 935 -7733
CA
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/04
$416.52
SAFETY CAMP
DAVANNI'S #15
EDINA
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/04
$134.09
SAFETY CAMP
FASTFOTO & DIGITAL - N
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/09
$537.00
POOL LICENSE
JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES,
800 - 742 -8720
TX
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/11
$471.94
SOCKS
VISR
WWW.VISR.NE' NC
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/12
$35.00
ATHLETIC ASSN AWARDS
EDINA LIQUOR 50TH
EDINA
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/13
$130.42
YOUTH SUMMER PROGRAM
DAVANNI'S #15
EDINA
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/13
$26.81
ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES.
MICHAELS #3739
BLOOMINGTON MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/16
$35.00
ATHLETIC ASSN AWARDS
EDINA GRILL
EDINA
MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/16
$35.00
ATHLETIC ASSN AWARDS
JJ'S CLUBHOUSE
GOLDEN VALLE MN
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/17
$39.00
LICENSE
THE PRODUCTIVITY PRO 1
303 -471 -7401
CO
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/21
$35.61
EQUIPMENT RENTAL JUNE
PITNEY BOWES*
800 - 228 -1071
CT
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/24
$27.62
EQUIPMENT RENTAL JULY
PITNEY BOWES INVOICE
800 - 228 -1071
CT
JOHN KEPRIOS
2010/08/24
$27.62
EQUIPMENT RENTAL AUGUST
PITNEY BOWES INVOICE
800 - 228 -1071
CT
JEFF LONG
2010/07/30
$107.26
PRINTER
BEST BUY MHT 00002816
RICHFIELD
MN
JEFF LONG
2010/08/06
$159.31
TEST MONITOR
SUPERCIRCUITS INC
512 - 3729348
TX
JEFF LONG
2010/08/15
$160.90
PRINTER
OFFICE DEPOT #415
EDEN PRARIE
MN
JEFF LONG
2010/08/18
$106.52
CONFERENCE
ZAPEVENT
612 - 548 -5648
MN
JEFF LONG
2010/08/20
$106.52
CONFERENCE
ZAPEVENT
612- 548 -5648
MN
DEB MANGEN
2010/07/27
$57.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE MAX
EDINA
MN
DEB MANGEN
2010/07/27
$15.50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE MAX
ST. LOUIS PAR
MN
DEB MANGEN
2010/07/30
$13.18
ICE CREAM
JERRY'S FOODS
EDINA
MN
DEB MANGEN
2010/08/05
$25.60
GROCERY STORES,SUPERMAW TARGET 00002600
ST. LOUIS PAR
MN
Page 1
1624.6406
1624.6406
1624.6406
1624.6406
1624.6406
1624.6406
1600.4390.06
1600.4390.06
5310.6103
5621.5510
4077.6406
1624.6406
1629.6406
4077.6406
4077.6406
5621.6104
5621.6235
5621.6235
5621.6235
1400.6160
1400.6406
1400.6160
1400.6104
1400.6104
1180.6406
1180.6406
1513.6103
1180,, ZP K
$8,781.44
Page 2
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing po cies and
Aj it (0- [to —
ager
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
7/27/10 - 8/25/10
Card Holder
Aerchani
Account
Name
Trans Date
Amount
Purchase Discription
Merchant Name Merchant City
State
Code
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/02
$153.78
COUNCIL WORKSHOP
D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS
MN
1100.6106
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/13
$90.00
CONFERENCE
MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155
MN
1140.6104
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/13
$90.00
CONFERENCE
MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155
MN
1400.6104
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/13
$1,228.02
DIGITAL CAMERA & ACCESSRYS NATIONAL CAMERA TENT S. GOLDEN VALLE MN
2210.6710
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/17
$173.96
COUNCIL WORKSHOP
D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS
MN
1100.6106
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/18
$287.97
PORTABLE HARD DRIVE
B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 800 - 9479950
NY
2210.6711
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/19
$1,249.87
DATA STORAGE ARRAY
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA
2210.6711
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/19
$71.40
HEALTH CONFERENCE
MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEAL 651-2014499
MN
1490.6104
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/19
$20.00
WELLNESS PROGRAM
JERRY'S FOODS . EDINA
MN
1513.6218
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/20
$488.95
WESTERN DIGITAL HARD DRIVE AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA
2210.6711
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/23
$125.00
HEALTH. CONFERENCE
CRAGUNS'LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD
MN
1490.6104
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/24
$70.00
CONFERENCE
MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155
MN
1140.6104
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/24
$100.00
CONFERENCE
MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155
MN
1140.6104
JOHN WALLIN
2010/08/25
$499.00
SAMSUNG HDTV
AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA
2210.6711
$8,781.44
Page 2
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing po cies and
Aj it (0- [to —
ager
/-k
O,
G -V�
Cn
1 �0
,aea
REPORURECOMMEN DATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item V11. A.
DEBRA MANGEN
❑ Action
From:
CITY CLERK
❑ Discussion
® Information
Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010
Subject:
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received
since the last Council meeting.
RECEIVED
Susan Howl wlsp 7 ?nln
To: Edina City Council
I was dumbfounded to learn that Section 3 of the trail options would sacrifice the highly used
pedestrian sidewalk on Lincoln Drive. It covers one mile from Caribou Coffee to the stoplight at
Lincoln /Vernon /Gleason.
Surely you jest. This popular concourse is used daily, in all weather, by residents of adjacent
homes and housing complexes - also serving employees of United Health on Lincoln Drive.
As I ride my bike almost daily on the adjacent roadway, it pleases me to see so many people of
all ages walking, running or exercising their dogs.
To put cyclists, pedestrians and dogs -on -leash on a common path, with increased 2 -way traffic
and no divider is a recipe for disaster. This increased risk would surely dissuade older
pedestrians, who are now among its greatest users. The backup option - section two - is better
only because section 3 is so bad.
Unfortunately its proposed route in back of United Health would destroy native trees and
compromise the fragile wetlands along the Creek with elevated boardwalks. It would cross
Vernon /Gleason at the stoplight.
This is not only a very busy intersection, but serves as a shortcut for rush hour traffic (2:45 -
5:45pm) of motorists from Opus, United Health, and 169 south seeking quicker access to
Vernon, Gleason and Crosstown east. I pass through this intersection twice daily, and consider
it risky, even with a semaphore.
Bike trails are important, but they are not an imperative when weighed against their
consequences and against the abundance of bike trails which already exists.
Bredesen and Normandale Parks each offer double two mile loops - one for bikes and one for
pedestrians These one -way bike loops are much safer overall than the proposed trail.
A short trip by bike or car to Hopkins will allow access to two long distance trails -- the LRT
South which extends to Shakopee; the LRT North to Lake Minnetonka, continuing to Victoria.
The Three Rivers Park District, which would operate the proposed trail through Edina, already
operates 62 hiking /biking trails on 14 different sites, including nearby Bryant and Hyland Lakes.
So why is another trail necessary, particularly when it would cost some $35 million, intrude on
public and private land and increase the possibility of accidents with its numerous
intersections?
As a serious cyclist who has logged over 150,000 miles since moving to Edina in 1967, I am
skeptical of the claim that the proposed trail would be used by half a million cyclists per year.
April to October is a generous measure of weather conducive to cycling. In those 5 months an
average of 100,000 cyclists per month would be needed to claim 500,000 per year. That
factors to an average of 3,333 per day.
Since most families can only cycle on weekends, that average would have to be boosted for
Saturday /Sunday.
In my experience, that volume would discourage use of the trail by families, who should be the
primary objective of a park trail.
Don't overlook --
Bike purchasers overestimate use. Just check any Edina garage.
Trail advocates also overestimate use in their enthusiasm for trails.
Congestion and stop signs are deterrents to trail use, but weather is the biggest factor. As
Minnesotans know, good weather is often at odds with weekends.
Surely there is a better use of $35 million than this intrusive trail through Edina
neighborhoods.
Thank you for considering my views.
Sincerely, Robert J. Wilkins
6612 Scandia Road
Edina MN 55439
952- 941 -3732
Email: mlwpacewsw @aol.com
2
Robert D. Lucas
Heidi S. Schellhas
6106 Waterford Court S. RECEIVED
Edina, Minnesota 55436 SEP 16 2050
September 10, 2010
The Honorable James Hovland
Mayor of Edina
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Proposed Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina —
Section 3
Dear Mayor Hovland:. .
We write to request that the City not adopt Section 3 in the Three Rivers Park District
proposal. We strenuously believe that Section 3 in the Three Rivers proposal would be a poor
choice for all of the reasons stated below:
1. The Section 3 route is very dangerous. We sincerely believe that a pedestrian,
bicyclist, or both, will be seriously injured if this route is adopted. Section 3 contemplates that
pedestrians and bicyclists will essentially use the same path just a few feet apart. As frequent
dog- walkers, we observe that even now heavy traffic levels and fast vehicle speeds create safety
concerns for sidewalk pedestrians.
2. The sidewalk fulfills a genuine need for pedestrians (and their dogs), which will
be lost if a multi -use trail replaces the sidewalk.
3. We understand that more than 1,800 cars will cross the proposed Section 3 route
every day, because approximately 700 homes, a business with 1,100 employees, and a church are
located in proximity to the proposed Section 3 route.
4. Nineteen roads_ or driveways cross the proposed' Section 3 route. Bicyclists will
be required to stop at 19 stop signs, one for each proposed Section 3 route crossing. Each stop
creates a risk of accident. Based on our personal experience, we feel that not all bicyclists will
obey these stop signs, greatly increasing the risk of bicycle - vehicle and bicycle- pedestrian
accidents.
The Honorable James Hovland
September 10, 2010
Page Two
We ask that the City of Edina select the proposed Section 2 route, a far safer route than
the proposed Section 3 route, for the location of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina.
ry truly yours,'
Robert D.:Luc
Heidi S. Schellhas
Mayor James Hovland
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50'h St.
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Nine Mile Creek Trail
Dear Mayor Hovland,
RECEIVED September 15, 2010
SEP 16 [010
Parks were set aside to be used and enjoyed by everyone ... not a select few.
We can leave no greater legacy to future generations then to expand a park system that
provides access to outdoor recreation to all and at the same time protects and improves
vital natural areas. We have the opportunity now with the proposed Three Rivers Park
District walking and biking trail along Nine Mile Creek in Edina.
I have walked the entire length of Nine Mile Creek that flows through Edina. In many
places it is just a drainage ditch. The creek is on the state's impaired water list because
its muddy flow doesn't support the fish species that a creek of this type should.
Nine Mile Creek Watershed is proposing to restore Nine Mile Creek through the City
which may include constructing gentle curves thus making a natural habitat for fish and
wildlife. If a Creek -based trail route is chosen, the Park District and Watershed District
will collaborate efforts and conduct stream restoration in conjunction with trail
construction. The staff at Three Rivers Park District are professionals in designing paths
that are ecologically sound as well as taking into account and respecting near -by homes.
I have biked most of the existing Three Rivers Park District Bike and Walking Trails.
Along the way I have observed deer, turkeys, ducks, egrets, song birds and a turtle laying
her eggs all living in harmony with the trail.
The trail would provide safe and convenient biking and walking routes connecting homes
to work places, schools, recreation and shopping.
The proposed path through Edina is a critical part of a larger regional trail system,
connecting the western suburbs and beyond. Is the City of Edina going to have the path
stop at its borders thus making us an island?
Some have proposed that the trail be put on city streets. Biking on streets creates a safety
problem and the recreational value would be lost.
Public health advocates urge us to get more exercise. " Many studies show that people
living in walkable neighborhoods walk and cycle more for recreation and transportation
and are less likely to be obese ". (Jim Sallies, Director of Childhood Obesity Prevention
Group)
The Three Rivers Park District reports that there are typically six Police Officers and six
PSO's on duty at any given time within the park district. These numbers can vary day to
day, depending on special events.
The Park District has not had any violent crimes such as rape, robbery or assaults occur
on the Park District Regional Trail System.
The Park District will use a variety of funding sources to pay for the development of the
proposed trail including its own bonding authority, regional grants from the Metropolitan
Council, State grants and Federal grants.
"Each year Edina residents pay more than 3.5 million in taxes to the Three Rivers Park
District yet the City Of Edina has no trails or other district owned park facilities within
our borders ". (Star & Tribune, January 31 st, 2009)
If we don't act at this time to approve the Three Rivers Park District path proposed along
Nine Mile Creek in Edina, it will be a lost opportunity to improve the lives of future
generations.
I urge your support.
Respectfully,
Steve Sando (68 year Edina resident)
5133 Juanita Ave
Edina, MN 55424
(952) 927 -7830
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Please distribute to City Leaders
RECEIV PEE D
SEP T 2010
From: Yedda Marks [mailto:yedda @comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:20 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Please distribute to City Leaders
TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager
Honorable Mayor James, Hovland
Council' Member Joni Bennett
Council Member Mary Brindle
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Ann,.Swenson
Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown
Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter
Planning Commissioner., Michael Fischer
Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest
Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel
Planning Commissioner Julie Risser
Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer
Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder
Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton
Cary Teague, Planning Director
Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director
FROM: Yedda S. Marks, 4508 Garrison Lane, Edina, MN 55424, 952 - 926 -6083
As a resident and taxpayer in Edina, I strongly encourage you to amend Edina building code, 850.11
Section H. The current 1 -foot elevation height restriction may be applicable in some neighborhoods (e.g.
Country Club and South Harriett Park), but is restrictive and a detriment to many other neighborhoods.
I support reasonable building ordinances that protect historical neighborhoods and the architectural
integrity of new building, but 850.11 Section H is too limiting and extreme. It does not take into
consideration problems with much of the aging housing stock and irregular lot issues with a large
percentage of homes in Edina.
Instead, I would suggest that you amend the code to include language previously suggested by City
Planner, Cary Teague to read, ".....The first floor elevation may be raised 'up to four feet, only if it is
necessary because of high ground water or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements."
Please consider my request.
Sincerely,
Yedda S. Marks
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Park Dedication Fee
RECEIVED
- - - -- Original Message---- -
SEP 1
From: Mark Guettler [ mailto:mark_guettler @yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 9:38 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Park Dedication Fee
Edina City Council Members.
Please vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and Tax Incremental Financiing for the
Colonial Church Waters Project. I am opposed to any type of tax payer subsidy for this
project.
Regards,
Mark Guettler
5920 Olinger Blvd
Edina Police Department recognized for going `Above and Beyond' in support of employ... Page 1 of 1
CURRENT PRESS RELEASES
Edina Police Department recognized for going 'Above and Beyond' in
support of employees in military
Edina, Minn., June 19, 2008 -- The Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve
(ESGR) division of the federal Department of Defense recently recognized the
Edina Police Department with an "Above and Beyond" award for its unfaltering
support of their employees who also serve in the military. Gov. Tim Pawlenty
presented the award to Edina Deputy Police Chief Jeff Long and other members
of the Department on May 12.
The Edina Police Department was one of 27 employers in Minnesota honored
with the "Above and Beyond" award at the Minnesota State Committee for
ESGR Annual Awards Banquet held at the Golden Valley Country Club. The
Department was recognized specifically for their support of two Police Officers,
Port Security Specialist Kevin Rofidal and Boatswain's Mate Brandon Kuske,
who both serve in the Coast Guard Reserve and were called to duty last fall
after the I -35W bridge collapse.
"Within minutes of the bridge collapse, we had most of our personnel deployed
at the scene assisting the City of Minneapolis or on -duty in Edina," said Rofidal.
"Over the next four days, even though the Police Department was stretched
thin, we were given complete support to fulfill our obligations to the Coast
Guard. Without hesitation, our colleagues and supervisors filled schedules and
covered shifts on a very short- notice.
"The fact that they [Rofidal and Kuske] are in the military serving our country
in addition to their work as police officers shows that they are the ones going
'Above and Beyond., "' said Long. "It may sound clich6, but the least we can do
Is be flexible and supportive when they are called to duty."
ESGR was established in 1972 and its members have been working to gain and
maintain employer support for members of the Guard and Reserve by
recognizing outstanding support, increasing awareness of the law and resolving
any conflict between employer and employee through mediation.
According to ESGR Chairman and retired Brigadier General Dennis Schulstad,
"It's important to remember that the military would not be able to handle
homeland defense and emergency response without the Guard and Reserve. It
requires a great deal of sacrifice not only from the individuals in service and
their families, but also the employers who have to continue working when an
employee is called to duty. The Edina Police Department has always been really
cooperative and makes it very easy for these men and women to do their work
for the military."
For more information, contact the Edina Police Department at 952 - 826 -1610 or
visit the ESGR website at www.esgr.org.
http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / pressreleases/ L6- 42_PressRelease_200806_07.htm 9/15/2010
Susan Howl
From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum.julie @gmail.com] F ECEIVED
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 3:48 PM SEP 16 2010
Subject: FW: Waste to Energy Program for Oct. 7 RSW Meeting
Would you please give this article to all city council members and Mayor Hovland? Wood smoke is a serious, ongoing
and burgeoning issue. I urge all city officials to read this and think independently about the toxicity of burning wood along
with garbage on top of it. Thank you.
Wood fired power stations = bad
Matthew I Sepielnher 1.1. 2010 at 4 :1.; In;i Pollution. Science j 1 :RI,: ht1.p: / /wp.me /pGVPe -8i
Here's a simple equation:
wood fired = bad
Read "Don't Send Forests to the Furnace" by the Australian newspaper Green Left Weekly.
In December 2009, the Massachusetts Medical Society, publisher of the prestigious New
England Journal of Medicine, announced a policy opposing wood -fired power station
proposals on the grounds that "biomass power plants pose an unacceptable risk to the public's
health by increasing air pollution ".
And let me remind you if you mistakenly believe that burning wood is "carbon neutral"
because trees grow back that extra methane is released into the atmosphere, the wood needs
transporting to the plant by diesel belching trucks, and if you cut down a 400 year old tree,
unless you plant another 400 year old tree in its place, there is 400 years of being in carbon
deficit.
Let me also remind you that wood smoke is toxic. It's mutagenic and carcinogenic. i.e.
woodsmoke causes cancer and can cause mutations in the next generations. Woodsmoke
should be minimised in the air we breathe to reduce the risk of cancers, especially lung, mouth
and throat cancers in the general population.
Hydro (where appropriate), geothermal, wind, photovoltaic, solar concentrators, tidal,
microgeneration = good
Coal, diesel, natural gas, and burning biomass = bad
1
Miller— Carrina 4509 Garrison Lane OO Ldina, MN 559-29- O 952.926.4839
September 16, 2010.
TO: Honorable Mayor James Hovland
Council Member Joni Bennett
Council Member Mary Brindle
Council. Member Scot Housh
Council Member Ann Swenson
FROM: Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino
RE: Background on Pending Planning/Zoning Issue
The attached information is for your background only. No doubt the issue.in some fashion will
eventually make it to your formal agenda, so we are providing this to you in preparation for future
discussion.
Last night we attended the Planning Commission's open house meeting where we added our opinions -
again— regarding changes we believe should be made to Edina City Code 850.11, Section H restricting
first floor height elevations to one foot. We have been opposed to this city code amendment since its
first and second readings in November of. 2007 because it creates a host of dilemmas for us and
potentially others including the need to go through the variance process. Now, with the Minnesota
Supreme Court ruling (Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka) our variance request and anticipated
building project can't go forward.
In addition to the meeting last night, we have also attended and commented at the formal Planning
Commission meetings, a work session with City Council and Planning Commissioners on Sept. 7, a
Planning Commission work session on Sept. 8, and have had extensive correspondence and discussions
with Planning staff.
The documents attached are copies of initial correspondence with staff and then a summary presentation
we intended to show at the open house with photos. The equipment didn't work so,we were unable to
visually present our case.
A few other important points:
Although we are frustrated with the situation, we have no complaints with Planning or other
City staff. Kris Aaker, Cary Teague and Heather Worthington have been responsive, professional
and resourceful. The City of Edina is fortunate to have them on staff.
We hope the Planning Commission will consider what the League of Minnesota is
recommending, "that cities should revise building codes to avoid variance requests." After last
night's open house, we believe they have some options to consider including language with
provisions added to aforementioned code or creating conditional use permits for certain
situations. Both options were discussed.
We were encouraged that at last night's open house, there were no objections to changing the
first floor height restriction from other residents who attended and who were candid in
comments about agenda items.
Its important to us that ou understand this correspondence today is truly for your background. We
respect the process and are hopeful the Planning Commission with appropriate input from Planning staff
will find a solution. And, in turn, when.the City Council receives the proposed solution that it will be a
thoughtful and solid one for everyone involved:
Thank you for your time and review of the information.
Miller — Carrino 45og Garrison Lane* E-dina, MN 55424 O 952 9 bS 26.4839
.........................
............ ..... .......................... . F.^'+l 2Lt+ f/. iSf27f+ 4L �iY/ 0?SSi59SSSYfiDYLALiFiWiMSY3rHfI. i9ttl A25Y• ii/. YJ4MS9KHAY• Si34�ii iiS4G4G#/ rC�iYX6�1G4I .'FR!!lA'F69WeG7Ci-0OWd'ri
S{ SS20MLW". AGLS9Y6SR' �SSS% d99Ci1 r94. iirFFF. iSfdS' CY. S'H+L4NY //�PY•i94f9LLM99K9Lii7` ..
August 10, 2010
Ills. Kris Aaker
Assistant Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Kris:
Thank you for your continued assistance and guidance over the last several.months as we pursue a major
property improvement project to teardown our 1959 walkout rambler located at 4509 Garrison Lane.
In light of the recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision regarding — specifically, restricting— building
variances, the purpose of this letter is to:
1. Seek your advice and direction for next steps in our project— realizing you may need to
consult with the City Attorney, we have sent him a copy of this letter also (see below).
2. Provide additional background you and others may need about our project.
3. Request that you and the City Attorney consider our case and suggestions.
Background
We hate to bore you, Kris, with more and repetitive background on our project, but since we are sending
this letter for you to discuss with Roger Knutson we thought it would be helpful so you both have the full
picture.
Our current house is located in a very modest area of Edina. Since 1995 we have been considering what
to do with our house, initially gathering information on remodeling and then comparing remodeling vs. a
teardown. Over the years we've sought advice from remodeling contractors, new home contractors and
real estate agents. Because our house would require such an extensive amount of remodeling, the advice
from experts in 2005 was that we should wait to see what happened with the real estate market
particularly in our area which is south of the Country Club and South Harriett Park /Halifax areas where
most of the major remodeling and teardowns were being, done -at the time. They thought, and we agreed,
it was important to wait since we would be the first major undertaking on our block and within a
several block radius.
Meanwhile, we continued to watch the market, review information, investigate potential contractors, and
analyze our decision for the best timing.
Late in 2007 we thought we were ready to move forward and were planning on a start date of spring
2008. At that point, we knew our project was beyond a modest remodel and would require a teardown.
Then the City of Edina decided to make changes in the building code restricting the height of first
floor elevations to address some residents complaints regarding oversized rebuilds. For numerous
reasons that you will read about below, this ordinance amendment created problems for our intended
project. Then, the economy took another downward spiral so we decided to wait a little longer.
All these delays for best timing meant some large home repairs were put on hold. In November of 2009
our roof started leaking in several places so we knew we had to do something —no more waiting! We
We chose College City for several reasons including that they are advanced in green- building techniques
and; if possible, we want to build a certified green home. In addition, we wanted a builder who wouldn't
give us ideas for a towering, seven - figure home placed in our modest neighborhood— something we
believed would meet the intent of concerns addressed through Edina's Massing Taskforce.
In November of 2009 we started formally working on our plans. our goals from the beginning have been
to:
Build a certified green home that utilizes sustainability and universal design integrity =a home
that should.never need to be re -built on this lot;
- Build a home that is void of the numerous problems we've struggled with for more that 18
years including mold, mildew (resulting from high water table on our lot) and energy
inefficiencies; -
Build a'home that complements and blends in with the neighborhood, preferably another
walk -out rambler (what our neighbors would also prefer), this time using,a prairie- influenced
architectural style (e.g. 4/12 low - profile roof);
- In keeping with our desire to be "green ", have the current house moved for resale vs.
demolished which helps reduce landfill material;
- And, avoid the variance process if possible.
We would probably have already submitted our application for a building permit if it weren't for our final
goal of avoiding the variance process. This has been quite problematic for several reasons, including:
- The curve of the street creates inconsistent set -backs which, in turn, creates design "pinch
points"
A very irregular shaped buildable footprint resulting in numerous design challenges
A high water table that has resulted in flooding of our walkout level (several episodes
following the super storm in 1988) and ongoing mold and mildew from a foundation that sits
on a high water table.
And a pond'in the backyard where the normal water level has only recently been identified.
In July we, along with our builder, had finally whittled away at our new home design so that it would
require just one variance request. We have,been diligent in working to eliminate the need for any
variances arising from the unusual aspects of our lot as described above. After at least 12 design
revisions we have overcome the need for what could be considered convenience variances for front
setbacks, side setbacks, or overall lot coverage. The onlytremaining issue —the first floor elevation —is a
variance needed to eliminate health and safety hardships of the current dwelling.
Nearly ready to submit our variance request, we learn about the Minnesota Supreme Court decision based
upon Krummenacher vs. City of Minnetonka that has forced all municipalities including the City of Edina
to halt variance requests.
So.... here we are in limbo again, pre - approved for a construction loan (at an interest rate we could lose if
we don't start our project soon), waiting with our leaky roof for someone to make sense out of this legal
and legislative chokehold.
Making Our Case
Instead of waiting for legislature to hear and consider the ramifications of the court ruling, we would ask
the City of Edina to look at other options suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities including
revising its own building codes that are creating the need for variance requests. We can't speak to other
2
requests, but the one that is restricting our project is the City's decision in 2007 to revise Section H.
Edina City Code 850.11 and restrict the height of first floor elevations.
Back on November 20 2007, we attended the City Council meeting that was scheduled to discuss the first
floor elevation. Unfortunately, also on the agenda that evening was public comment for a proposed
building moratorium. We did speak about the elevation issue and added our opinion not supporting a
moratorium, but the discussion of the elevation issue was little compared to the moratorium. You can
confirm our testimony in the minutes /video on record (see
http://Mmm.cityofedina.com/departments/—WatchaMeeting.htm go to Archives, City Council; November
20, 2007; click on video; choose Jump to Testimony by Jeff Miller, resident; or, counter number 01:08:34)
As a follow -up to that meeting, we sent a letter that was referenced in the second reading of the
proposed Ordinance on December 4. In those meeting minutes or by watching video of the meeting (see
counter 02:26:18), you will find that City Council members and Cary Teague, Planning Director, specifically
discussed our letter and situation with an elevated flood plain. Instead of even considering that the
revised code /new ordinance was a problem, the Council moved forward with the new ordinance noting
that "a variance would be needed whether they remodel, requested an addition or did a tear down .... that
it is a condition where the flood plain would qualify as a hardship." Clearer the City Council and Planning
Department defines flooding and potential flooding as a hardship. We agree.
Still, if the City did not have such an awkward building code that specifically restricts building on the first
floor elevation, then we would not need a height - related variance. Our problem requiring a first -floor
height variance is due to several factors: A high water level, the backyard (between the house and
pond) has a minimal slope (in essence a flat yard), and we only have 7 -foot ceilings restricting the
reasonable use of primary square footage. NOTE: In addition to ongoing mold and mildew, we have
evidence of the high water table from when we added a deck in 2002 and hit water when digging the
footings. The high ground water level along with the 7 -ft ceilings creates the following problems or
hardships:
- Previous floods /water in the lower level and potential future floods
- Health and safety issues from ongoing mold and mildew from foundation condensation
7 -foot ceilings limit the use of the space for things like exercise equipment. (Try to find even
a treadmill with a flat platform so that a 6 -foot plus man doesn't hit his head when jogging is
impossible.)
Therefore, we would need to apply for a height variance that would:
A. Add one foot to the foundation height to solve the high water level and flat topography of the
lot, and
B. Add one foot to the ceiling height from 7 -feet to 8 -feet to allow for usable space. Note: Most
new homes being built have 9 -feet ceilings on the walkout level, we are only asking for 8 -feet. And,
C. Accommodate the extra inches for current building techniques (current truss systems need
more height than outdated joist systems used in 1959).
Furthermore, with our intended prairie- influenced design with a low- profile roof /pitch, we do intend to
be at least 10' feet under the overall height restrictions for the house, yet we simply want to be able to
have full use of primary square footage on the walkout level. After all we are taxed on full use of
square footage. The current height restriction on the first floor elevation is limiting and has created
ongoing design delays. There's just no way around seeking a variance request for the first floor elevation
needed to build an improved and structurally sound walk -out rambler.
On the other hand, we recognize that we could, in fact, build a new structure with a 7 -foot ceiling height
walkout level, and then add two additional floors above, still complying with the overall height limit. That
design option absolutes would not fit the character of the neighborhood (primarily walk -out ramblers,
ramblers and a few split- entries) and our most direct neighbors would unequivocally be against such a 3
structure. We do not blame them. It would look repulsive. And, we believe it absolutely is not the intent
of the massing taskforce.
In the Supreme Court ruling it stated that "unless and until the Legislature takes action to provide a more
flexible variance standard for municipalities, we are constrained by the language of the statute to hold
that a municipality does not have the authority to grant a variance unless the applicant can show that her
property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance."
In our case, if the litmus test or question is "Can the property be used in a reasonable manner without a
variance ?" We would answer NO. We currently cannot use primary and taxed square footage due to all
of the points mentioned above nor could we rebuild unless we can increase the foundation and first floor
height. Yet, others would argue that we do or can use the space; more specifically, "they" would argue
that we should just make do. To most folks, there's a huge difference between reasonable use and
making do.
What is unclear is the definition of "use." It's a he- said - she -said argument and no one wins. Reasonable
use, therefore, becomes a gray and nebulous determination and is only in consideration because of the
City of Edina's building code. Again, we do not wish to go beyond the overall height restriction, but we
do need to increase first floor elevation.
The additional guidelines required for determining reasonable use include hardship factors.
- The first factor The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. We
believe, as stated above, that we have a valid case here, but again this is a subjective
determination.
The second factor: landowner's problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not
caused by the landowner. Again, the term unique is extremely vague and subjective.. Still, we
would hope that not all Edina homes have mold and mildew problems created from
foundation condensation and flooding issues. So, to say that our property has unique
problems not caused by us is, we believe, accurate and meets the second hardship factor.
The third factor. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality. This is what is. crazy: Granting the variance absolutely would NOT alter the character
of the home, street, neighborhood. YET, we could proceed without a variance and build
something that meets the code and is totally out of character.
Next Steps — Please Advise
Quite honestly, Kris, we feel paralyzed, tentative and unsure. We have waited over two years for the right
timing on our project and now our house is in serious need of repair (leaking roof, insulation, driveway,
windows, kitchen with inoperable appliances, the list goes on).
We hope that the City of Edina will expediently explore alternatives to its current building codes
instead of waiting for the snail -paced legislative and judicial processes. The case that led to the Supreme
Court ruling took over two years of legal maneuvers. Supreme Court cases can't be overturned.
Legislative action takes even longer. It's not unreasonable to conclude that it could be YEARS before this
legal mess is defined. For any city to wait is a detriment to progress and revenue.
The League of Minnesota Cities suggests four responses for cities. We hope the City of Edina will
consider the fourth response: "Cities may want to build .greater flexibility into their existing conditional
use permit, planned unit development and setback regulations to explicitly afford greater latitude to allow
"variance -like" approvals under the zoning code. For instance, a city might establish alternative setback
requirements to allow for construction that is consistent with neighborhood attributes." We would ask
the City of Edina to consider "tweaking" Section H, Edina City Code 850.11 perhaps by detailing
4
exceptions or alternatives to the first floor elevation criteria which would eliminate our need for a variance
and the ability to move forward.
We ask that you provide us with advice on next steps. Specifically we wonder.
Will.the City and Planning Commission consider our variance request? If yes, can the City
Attorney provide legal counsel /guidance to the Planning Commission that a variance request
would be approved? We simply can't risk waiting another year if the variance is declined.
Or,.will the City Council consider amending the aforementioned ordinance? If yes, what is the
anticipated timeline for resolve?
Or, to borrow a phrase from the Honorable Mayor Hovland, does the City of Edina have any
other "tools in its toolbox "?
We are most willing to meet with you or others as needed. Thank you again, Kris, for your patience and
guidance throughout our potential project to date.
Best regards,
Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino
CC: Roger Knutson, Attorney, City of Edina
Cary Teague, Planning Director, City of Edina
Darin Pavek, President, College City Design Build
Bjorn Freudenthal, VP Sales & Marketing, College City Design Build
5
M
9-509 Garrison sane 0 r dina, MN 55+2-+
The Situation — Residents' Perspective
❑ 2007 begin serious. consideration process:
Remodel vs. rebuild vs. move?
❑ Project Goals:
o Certified green home; avoid current water problems; build to
new standards; design to complement neighborhood with low -
profile roof
❑ December 4, 2007 Edina amends city code 850.11, Section H with
F elevation increase limit
• Continue to review plans want to avoid variance process
• Spring 2010 move forward with teardown plans need one variance
on first floor height
❑ June 2010 Krummenacher halts variances
M
-+509 6arrisonLanc 0 E_Jina, MN 55-+2-+
The Situation — City's Perspective
❑ League of MN Cities suggests cities should revise
building codes to avoid variance requests
❑ City staff presents realistic solution/revision to
Planning Commission for 850.11 Section H
❑ _Planning Commission not supportive, suggest
residents go for variance
❑ City Attorney reluctant and advises against variance
process
i
9-509 Garrison sane 0 r Jana, MN 55+2+
Project Status - Pickle in the Middle
❑ Miller- Carrino caught in pickle: Indefinite hold!
❑ Krummenacher AND City Code problematic
❑ Proceed with variance? Risk litigation?
❑ Wait for legislature? Can we really wait THAT long? NO
MR
, .-' MOP - g gg
M �M?
SIR " MW Val"
-M
W� , .1 , i'� M.
a M
Ed M
RM
er� a-rrino.
+509 Garrison Lane O E_Jina, MN 55 424
Proposed S Fact - Based - Approach oarh
❑ Edina should revise Code 850.11 Section H
❑ Does not reflect real world building situations
[:i Considerations & Contradictions:
1. Aging Edina housing stock, ubiquitous ramblers means
remodels/teardowns should encourage use of valuable lower level
square footage. YET Building code restriction of F on first floor
contradicts and prohibits. this consideration.
2. Better lower level/basement utilization reduces need for= adding
second stories and overall height; helps maintain architectural
character —an ideal, solution to the overall intent of the massing task
force. YET Building code contradicts and prohibits.
3. Green construction techniques use new growth timber trusses vs.
previous use of old growth 2" x 10" floor joist. YET building code
M
4509 C arrison Lane Q �cina, j�N 559-29-
Fact Based Approach: Elevation Increase Logic
Assume worse case — 6'6" lower level ceiling height
• Edina requires basement with 8' ceiling ❑ + 116"
• Encourage use of new growth floor trusses — 18" verses 2 ❑ + g»
x 10" construction
• Allow 1' foundation increase for homes in flood zone, ❑ + 1'
high ground water issues or minimal grade
• TOTAL ❑ + 3'2"
❑ Based on facts, the increase from 1' to 4' suggested by
the City Staff is reasonable and defendable when used in
conjunction with existing City Code for height, setback
and runoff
-4 11! ;
"What tools do we have in the tool box?"
The Honorable Mayor James Hovland
We whole-hearted-ly, agree with Mayor Hovland's quote -and approach:
How can-city government solve city problems with new considerations,
new tools? Answer-. Move beyond the status quo of bureaucracy and
consider new approaches, ideas and tools.
We encourage his approach to this variance problem so that we and -other
Edina residents can expeditiously move forward with redevelopment
plans.
Thank you,
Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino
Susan Howl
From: RayVoss@aol.com mai Ito: Ra Voss @aol.com
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:22 PM
To: Lynette Biunno SEN 1 4 fli0
Subject: Park Waiver request for Shelter Corp. project
Honorable Mayor Hovland_ and. City Council Members:
I just learned that you folks are in the process of formally considering the request of Shelter Corporation for a waiver of the
Park Impact Fee and that you are also considering a request from them for TIF money to help finance this project.
Please do NOT approve these requests.
There is no reason why this organization should receive preferential tax treatment for this development. The land „itself
has been tax free for years, That alone should be more than sufficient tax subsidy for them.
Also there is no reason why a waiver should be granted for the park impact fee. The people who will be living in this
facility are quite likely to use the parks nearby. In fact, the parks will probably be among the amenities used to promote,
the project. And whether they use.the parks themselves, you can be assured that their guests, relatives and
friends, children and grandchildren will use the parks. Just because someone is "old” doesn't mean that they won't use
the parks. In fact, today, a person who lives in that area was out walking and visited our home along the way. She is
older than me and I'm 69!
There is nothing that sets this development apart from any other commercial development in terms of its impact on the.
park system and al[the reasons why the City requires a park impact fee should apply here.
Finally, it is just not fair to further burden the taxpayers of the neighborhood and of Edina generally with subsidizing this
commercial development. There will be no "rent breaks" or any other "preferences" specifically for Edina residents
interested in living there, so there is no justification for any tax breaks, either in terms of TIF funding or in a full or partial
waiver of the park impact fee.
Thank you for your attention to this e-mail.
Raymond Voss
Mailing; address: 5021 Vernon Ave. So. #312
Edina,. Minnesota 55436
Residence address: 5716 Benton Ave.
Edina, Minnesota 55436
952- 927 -0448
rayvossi 46I.com
1
4
SEP 14 Z019
From: Steve Wallschlaeger [mailto:swallschlaeger @lifetouch.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13,2010 3:01 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation requests
Importance: High
I am under the understanding that there is' a request from the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation, to waive the Park
Dedication fee and provide TIF,money for this project. This project is not a benefit to the community at large and there is
absolutely no reason why any kind of taxpayer subsidy should be allowed. I vehemently oppose the waiverof the Park
Dedication fee and providing TIF funding and as a resident of the countryside neighborhood and the.city of Edina, I ask
that you vote NO to these proposals.
Steven J. Wallschlaeger
5621 Dale Ave
Edina, MN 55436
Steve Wallschlaeger
Swalischiaeaer@lifefouch.com I Senior Operations Manager - Field Operations I Lifetouch National School Studios I 11000 Viking Drive
Eden Prairle, MN 55344 ( 952.826.5749 (office) 1 612.432.2997 (cell) 1 952.826.4833 (fax)
Before printing, please Think about the environment
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http• / /www.messapelabs.com/email
1
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Please Vote NO for waiving the Park Dedication Fee
SEr 14 E
From: rkrustad @comcast.net [mailto:rkrustad @comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:07 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Please Vote NO for waiving the Park Dedication Fee
Please vote no on waving the park dedication fee.
- - - -- Original Message - - - -- [, °P
From: Elizabeth Jensen [mailto :elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net] SE P X14
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:03 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Shelter Corporation
It has come:to my attention that Shelter corporation is requesting waivers,on. the park fee
and looking for additional taxpayer subsidies. PLEASE vote NO ...... as a member of the
Countryside community, I am opposed to this development. If Shelter Corporation plans to
build move forward, they should be responsible for the park fee and TIF monies.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Jensen
1
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: No Tax Waiver
SEP 1 4 L�ii�
From: O'Shaughnessy, Eileen [mailto: Eileen. O'Sha ug h nessy@hcmed.org)
Sent: Monday,, September 13, 2010 2:51 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: No Tax Waiver s
Please do not allow the Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church a waiver on the Park Dedication Fee. A waiver is granted
if`it is in the best interest -of the project and would benefit the neighborhood. There was a lot of opposition to this plan.
This commerical project;already has gotten too many -concessions from this neighborhood, do not allow them to benefit
further. This project will greatly benefit from the park (at.the expense of the neighborhood). They should certainly pay
their share of taxes.
Eileen O'Shaughhessy
i
Susan Howl
Subject: FVH.
SEP
From: Dorothy Pool [mailto:dorothy @q.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:44 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject:
vote no on 9/13/10. This is all so illegal... Wrong from Dorothy Pool
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Living Waters - Park Fee Waiver
From: Christine Henninger [ma I Ito: Christine. Hen ninger@genmills.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:42 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Living Waters - Park Fee Waiver SEP 14 1060
Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members,
I am writing to express my opinion regarding the proposed waiver of the park dedication fee and public financing requested by
Colonial Church and the Living Waters Senior Development. I would respectfully request that you vote no ' to both requests. All
residents of Edina pay this fee through their property taxes, regardless whether they personally utilize any particular park within the
City of Edina. Living Waters is a commercial enterprise wanting to do business in the City of Edina, and they should be subject to the
same fees and taxes as any other taxpayer. I personally find it offensive that they would even request such a waiver, considering the
fact that the City has already amended their comprehensive plan and approved a rezoning change in order to accommodate their
development plans. Edina's lovely parks and green spaces are what brought many of us to invest in homes in Edina, and all residents
should be expected to support them, including the future residents of Living Waters.
Furthermore, the request for public financing I find to be equally unsupportable. As you know, this project does not have universal
support within the City of Edina, the neighborhood, or among the members of the City Council. In light of the other negative
impacts I believe that will result from this development (traffic, loss of green space, change in neighborhood character, parking
problems), to provide taxpayer money in support of this project seems unfair and fiscally irresponsible.
I appreciate your consideration of this matter.
Respectfully,
Christine Henninger
5816 Jeff Place
952 - 920 -1931
Christine Henninger
General Mills, Inc.
Tax Counsel
Ph. 763-293-3734
Fax 763 - 293 -2841
SEP 1 4 c10
From: Lane Barton [mailto:LaneBarton @comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:38 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Shelter Corp Colonial Church
To the Honorable Members of the Edina City Council,
If Shelter Corp is granted a waiver and TIF then I want my property taxes reduced by 50 %. The Colonial project is a
private profit seeking project that the owners must bear the financial burden of, not the tax payers. Just say NO to a
waiver and TIF money.
Lane Barton
6800 Limerick Lane
Edina, MN 55439 `
952 - 944 -5438
I
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Waters Senior Housing
SEA' 1 ': 'LVIO
From: Kerzner, Lawrence J [mailto: Lawrence. Kerzner@hcmed.org]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:28 PM
To Lynette Biunno
Subject: Waters Senior Housing
Dear Persons,
I write to inform you of my strong opposition to any waiver of park dedication fees for the Shelter Corporation's Waters
Senior Housing project and any tax increment financing. I urge you to disapprove what I understand are requests by
Shelter for these. This for profit venture should not be provided tax supported subsidies. Residents of the facility will
have full access to park facilities.' Shelter should share in the costs associated with maintaining all city infrastructure.
Sincerely,
Lawrence J. Kerzner
5828 Jeff, Place
Edina, MN 55436
1
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee
From: philb [mailto:philipjbohrer @yahoo.com] SEI L�I�
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:39 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Cc: Barbara Hoganson
Subject: Vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee
PLEASE vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and the say no to allowing any other kind of
taxpayer subsidy. Colonial Church and Shelter Corp should pay the fees and taxes they owe.
i
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: TIF money for Waters. Project
ECEb
SEP 1 2010
From: Kathy Dahlheimer [ mailto:kdahiheimer @comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:17 PM
To: Lynette Biunno .
Subject: TIF money for Waters Project
To City council:
Please take a serious look at TIF financing for such a project. Not only is.the project not welcome in the neighborhood
but it should not be subsidized by tax payers. These places are`for profit and believe me they make lots of- money. Also
that project will do nothing to property values in that area but take them down. Please vote against any tax breaks for
this project. Thank you. Kathleen° Dahlheimer 41801 West 60th Street Edina
Susan Howl
-rom: Home [mailto:mvidele @comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:23 AM c E.
To: Lynette Biunno ,k� i
Subject: Shelter Corps. Intent NOT TO PAY Taxes
Edina City Council,
As an Edina resident living within the Countryside Community, I am continually disgusted with Shelter Corp /Colonial
Church regarding their position on the fiscal needs stated in the below paragrah..l not in support of Shelter
Corps /Colonial Churchs self -fish position to be waived from fiscal liability associated with the Park Dedication Fee and
any TIF... As stated by Shelter Corp, they believe their reasons for not paying this tax is two fold:
1. That their residents won't be using the park.
2. The Watersproject does not benfit the Enitre community
I Disagree, their whole position for building this project is to provide a residence for people within EDINA and from
other neighboring cities, how much more community benefit can it be then that; besides what about when friends,
family, grandchildren come to visit their Seniors they going to be told by "The Waters" staff "DO Not go in the Park
because we are not paying for it ", no, they will use it; accept "WE" the Countryside Community will have to pay for the
park, while Shelter Corps /Colonial Churchs reap in more profits, supporting their self -fish position to be absoloved of
any of these Taxes.
If Shelter Corp is stating that this project is GOOD for the Community then they should be equally contributing their
portion of taxes to keep the community as wonderful as it is today ... THEY DON'T feel this way, simply by not wanting to
pay for iti! So I see they don't care for the Countryside Community or any community because they do not want to help
pay for it ... PERIOD!
As Council members representing me and the Edina citizens, what do you support and believe is right? Should Shelter
Corp /Colonial Church get a free ride or partner with the community and pay their EQUAL share of taxes... How is that
fair to us who live here?
As a representative of the PEOPLE who live here, your obligation is to us and your action speak louder than words
Mark Videle
Countryside Resident
We were just informed that Save the Countryside Group and Greater Edina Neighborhoods should be alerted that there is
going to be a City Council Meeting on Monday, 9113 at 5 PM where Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation will be
requesting the waiver of the Park Dedication fee (expected to be $750,000) and Tax Incremental Financing(or TIF money,
or taxpayers dollars). The Park Dedication fee Colonial Church /Shelter Corp should pay is about $750,000 and the TIF
money is only supposed to be allowed when it benefits a entire community. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND
THIS MEETING, MONDAY, 9113 at 5 PM at City Hall and share your concerns, and /or EMAIL THE CITY COUNCIL
AT edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us and ask them to vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and the say no to allowing
any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. Colonial Church and Shelter Corp should pay the fees and taxes they owe. Remember
some 600 property owners greatly impacted by this large complex don't want this large complex in their neighborhood to
begin with, and now they potentially may have to subsidize it on top of it with taxpayers dollars. Is this fair?
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Park Dedication Fee and the Shelter Corporation
From: joswan0l @aol.com [mailto:joswan0l @aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:01 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Park Dedication Fee and the Shelter Corporation
It is my strong conviction that the city council should vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and any other tax breaks
or subsidies for the Shelter Corporation as it moves ahead with developing its site on Colonial Church property.
As retired people, we seldom use the city parks as younger residents and families would. Nonetheless, living in a
community that values parks and green space is important to me and knowing that others can use them has added value.
To me, it is part of being a good citizen. I am not able to comprehend why others who live in this community should not
be given the same privileges and responsibilities. Contributing towards the maintenance and care of the park system is
part of an Edina resident's responsibilities. It is neither fair nor moral to ask for an exception.
Should an exception be granted, their portion of these taxes will be passed on to other residents. This is blatently unfair
and irresponsible - both on their part for asking and yours should you grant their request.
Joanna Swanson
7.
Susan Howl SEP i 3 LU19
Subject: FK Colonial Church / Park fee
From: St. Pierre Associates [mailto :john @stpierreassociates.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:03 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Cc: Barbara Hoganson
Subject: Colonial Church / Park fee
We have a prior commitment Monday evening 9/13 and will be unable to attend the City. Council Meeting.
We respectfully request that Colonial Church /Shelter Corp pay the Park Dedication fee.
It's impossible to believe that the occupants and /or their families will not utilize a park directly across the street from
the facility.
We're not aware of the reasoning for approving previous requests waiving the fee, but wedo not agree with the entire
concept. The developers should support the city if they wish to receive a financial gain by locating in the community.
We are required and willing to support Edina'Schools even though our children have grown,and moved out of Edina,
why should a corporate entity be treated any differently ?'
John & Jeanne St. Pierre
6005 Arbour Lane
Edina, MN
jst.pierre @comcast.net
i
Susan Howl
SEE 13 HIO
From: John.Harden [mailto:JHarden @hardeninc.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:17 AM
To:. Lynette Biunrio
Subject: Please forward to the Mayor and Council
'I understand that there is going to be .a City Council Meeting today where Colonial Church and
Shelter Corporation will be requesting a waiver of the Park Dedication fee and requesting Tax
Incremental Financing for their Waters project.
The development; partnership is asking for a waiver of. the:Park .Dedication Fee because it is unlikely
that residents will avail'themseIves of Edina's parks. Frankly, most of us don't use the parks, but we
pay the taxes to, support.them We don't ask for special consideration. Residents of the rental
apartment complex will have a. grand view of Countryside'Park,.and a short walk to Bredesen Park.
They should pay to support the parks, and the city, the same as everyone else. In fact, they should.,
pay more because they will be destroying the view for everyone using the park.
As for TIF, this project was sold and bought by the majority of the Council it seems — as the greatest
thing ever to happen to Edina. Why then, should it require a public subsidy? This is a project that
was forced upon the Countryside neighborhood against its wishes, and now Colonial and Shelter
want us to subsidize it? This is exactly the concerns we expressed and, we feel, are just the
beginning of requests for handouts.
If this project is everything it was sold as, and if Colonial and Shelter Corp is truly the "good neighbor"
they have promised, then they should participate fully with the rest of the neighborhood, pay their fair
share and stand on their own two feet like the Countryside Neighborhood tax payers.
John Harden
5829 Jeff Place
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Park - the new path at Bredesen
SEP 13 209
From: Craig Jarvinen [mailto:jarvinen @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:12 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Park - the new path at Bredesen
The new surface at Bredesen is wonderful!
However, it is now under the thick coating of leaves, stick and logs. I was on the trail yesterday and must
report that it is again a hazardous trail. The leaves trap water; together is an extremely slippery surface.
The sticks go right into spokes. Due to the trees along the trail, I think it needs frequent sweeping.
Also of note, there a few areas of the trail that need better drainage. These locations can be easily
identified by finding the mud covering the new path surface.
Craig
Craig ]arvinen
4113 Chowen Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55410
phone: 612-321-8488
e -mail: jarvinenCabaol.com
1
Page 1 of 1,
Gordon Johnson SFP 1 1 11110
From: Gordon Johnson [gjjohnson3 @comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:06 PM
To: 'JHovl and @ci.edina.mn.us';'SHoush @ci. edina. mn. us' ;'ASwenson @ci.edina.mn.us';'Mary Brindle';
'JBennett@ci.edina.mn.us'
Subject: Park Dedication Waiver - Shelter Corporation
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I understand'that there will be a meeting at 5:00 pm tomorrow afternoon at City Hall to consider a request from Colonial Church
and Shelter Corporation to request (a) a waiver of the park dedication fee for their development and (b) TIF funds for the
development of the project. Was an appropriate advance notice provided to the citizens of Edina inasmuch as the participation by
the five of you surely constitutes a public meeting? What difference is there between the notice requirements for this meeting and
the notice requirements for the recent meeting to interview and /or select the new city manager?
Over the years that I have had some involvement with the City of Edina, I have no recollection of any previous requests by
developers to waive the park,dedication fee applicable to their development. I strongly oppose the waiver of any portion, or all, of
the fee applicable to the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation for several reasons: (1) the granting of such a request would only
open the floodgates to every other developer or homeowner to request a similar waiver on the grounds that they wouldn't be using
the park system. There have been no objections (at least publically) by developers or subdividers in the past. (2) our park system
is short on funds at the moment and this particular fee could go a long ways toward completing the Countryside Park update much
earlier than the present plans espoused by John Keprios and (3) while I might feel that a nonprofit organization could receive
some reduction from the full fee described by ordinance, I don't have that feeling in this case. Both Shelter Corporation and the
new corporate entity created by Colonial Church are clearly "for profit" organizations! I haven't researched the records [I just
found out about this request meeting], but I don't recall any public dissemination of information regarding such requests from
Edina Park Plaza, 7500 York, Walker Elder Suites and other organizations in the community that could probably claim that they
wouldn't "use" the parks.
Second, and again without research, I would also oppose the use of TIF funds on the grounds that there is no general city-wide
benefit to be gained from the use of TIF monies. The only benefit is received directly by either Shelter Corporation or the new
Colonial Church corporate entity. In my opinion, that potential use is beyond the intended scope of the city's ordinance.
Therefore, I urge all of you to (a) hold a properly - scheduled meeting with public notice and (b) vote NO on both the park
dedication fee waiver and the use of TIF funds for this project.
Gordon Johnson
5837 Jeff Place
Edina, MN 55436 -1937
9/12/2010
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: September 13 Council Meeting
SEP 13 2110
From: SWOtteson @aol.com [mailto:SWOtteson @aol.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: September 13. Council Meeting
I am not able to attend the meeting at 5:00 P.M. today but must voice my opposition to an item on your agenda:
Please know that I and many, many Edina citizens are opposed to any taxpayer money being used to benefit Colonial
Church /Shelter Corporation. They should be required to pay the Park Dedication fee. And in noway can I see justification
for TIF financing for their project.
I expect our City Council to use our taxpayer money in ways that benefit all of us .... not heeding to requests from special
interests.
Sabra Whiting Otteson
5704 Continental Drive
Edina, MN 55436
952.933.9025
1
r is P: 4J
- - - -- original Message---- -
From: Jean Wikoff [mailto:djwikoff @comcast.net]. SEP 13 2019
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 7:51 PM'
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject:
Dear Council Members:
I understand there will be a council meeting this Monday, September
13 in which one of the agenda items is Colonial church /Shelter Corporation waiving of the
Park:- Dedication fee "and Tax Incremental Financing. As an Edina Taxpayer and Countryside
neighbor, I ask you to vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and to say no to allowing
any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. " Thanks for putting "residents first."
Jean M. Wikoff
6305 Hillside Road.
Edina, MN 55436
telephone # (H) 952- 925 -4230
e -mail djwikoff(@comcast.net
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living RECENED
SEP 13 X010
From: Sue Keator [ mailto :chickadeedee55 @gmaii.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:25 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Cc: Sue Keator
Subject: Waters Senior Living
Sept. 12, 2010
Dear Council Members,
It has been brought to my attention that the newly- approved Waters Senior project vows intends to seek a
waiver of the park fee. I have heard the reasoning is that the residents will not use the parks. Based on that
reasoning, I should not have to pay to support Edina's fine public school system as I do not have children. I also
shouldn't have to pay for the parks I don't use. We all know that this Will never happen, however. Paying taxes
is a part of life! If I want to live in Edina I must support the schools and parks whether I use them or not.
I would strongly urge you to REJECT the request for a waiver of park fees. You probably ought to reject the
upcoming request for TIF financing as well. If the project needs taxpayer support to be profitable perhaps it
should not be built.
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours truly,
Susan N. Keator
5041 Yvoone Terrace, Edina
1
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Shelter Corps. Intent NOT TO PAY Taxes
, "lig
From: Home [mailto:'mvidele @comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:23 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Shelter Corps. Intent NOT TO PAY Taxes
Edina City Council,". s;
As an Edina resident living within the Countryside Community, I am continually disgusted with Shelter Corp /Colonial
Church regardingtheir position on the'fiscal needs stated in the below paragrah..l not in support of Shelter
Corps /Colonial Churchs self- fish.position to be waived from fiscal liability associated with the Park Dedication Fee and
any TIF... As stated by Shelter Corp, they believe their reasons for not paying this tax is two fold:
1. That their residents won't be, using the'park.
2. The Waters project does not, benfit.the Enitre community
I Disagree; their whole position for building.this project is to provide a residence for people within EDINA and from
other neighboring cities, how much more':community benefit can it be then that; besides, what about when friends,
family, grandchildren come to visit,.their Seniors.they going to be told by "Tfie'Waters" staff "DO Not go in the Park
because we are not.paying for it ", no, they will use it; accept "WE" the Countryside Community will have to pay for the
park, while Shelter Corps /Colonial Churchs reap in more profits; supporting their self -fish position to be absoloved of
any of these Taxes.
If Shelter Corp is stating that this project is GOOD for the Community then they should be equally contributing their
portion of taxes to keep the community as wonderful as it is,today ... THEY DON'T feel this way, simply by not wanting to
pay for iti! So I see they don't care for the Countryside Community or any,coImmunity because they do not want to help
pay for it ... PERIOD!
As Council members representing me and the Edina citizens, what do you support and believe is right? Should Shelter
Corp /Colonial Church get a free ride or partner with the community and pay their EQUAL share of taxes ... How is that
fair to us who live here?
As a representative of the PEOPLE who live here, your obligation is to us and your action speak louder than words
Mark Videle
Countryside Resident
We were just informed that Save the Countryside Group and Greater Edina Neighborhoods should be alerted that there is
going to be a City Council Meeting on Monday, 9113 at 5 PM where Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation will be
requesting the waiver of the Park Dedication fee (expected to be $750,000) and Tax Incremental Financing(or TIF money,
or taxpayers dollars). The Park Dedication fee Colonial Church /Shelter Corp should pay is about $750,000 and the TIF
money is only supposed to be allowed when it benefits a entire community. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND
THIS MEETING, MONDAY, 9113 at 5 PM at City Hall and share your concerns, and /or EMAIL THE CITY COUNCIL
AT edinamail ci.edina.mmus and ask them to vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and the say no to allowing
any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. Colonial Church and Shelter Corp should pay the fees and taxes they owe. Remembe,
some 600 property owners greatly impacted by this large complex don't want this large complex in their neighborhood to
begin with, and now they potentially may have to subsidize it on top of it with taxpayers dollars. Is this fair?
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Countryside neighborhood
ECL- "i4 c-U)
-- Original Message - - - -- S E P 13 2110
From: Iry & Sherrill Borkon [mailto:IBORKON @comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 6:53 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Countryside neighborhood
Why is it that there seems to be a lack of regard for the laws that affect the ordinary
tax payers but all kinds of allowances are being made for the proposed development of the
Colonial church?
We have seen enough disregard for the populace on a national level. Let's not get
involved with the same chicanery in Edina. It is time to show regard for the many citizens
that live in the Countryside area that are opposed to this type of development. You may have
the power to act the way have to date but try to be fair in administering that power.
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Colonial Church Project
SEP 131 to
From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:38 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Colonial Church Project
I am particularly offended by the idea that Edina is even considering waiving the Park Dedication fees of $750,000 for
this project. The idea that this singular project which was objected to by the residence in the area of the project is also
being considered for TIF money is even more repungnant.
Please vote no to this Public financing of the project.
SEP 13 200
From: roy burns [mailto:roybburns @msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 11:25 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation Project
It is our understanding that the developer of this project is requesting the City to waive the Parks Dedication fee and.to
provide Tax Incremental Financing for this project. Since we are long term Edina residents and property owners and are
unable to attend the Council meeting, we are sending this e-mail to strongly request that the City Council vote "NO" to
both requests! Based on information provided to date, the project is of questionable need, is strongly opposed by a large
number of impacted property owners, and certainly does not provide any substantial benefit to the larger Edina
community. There appears to be no justification -for any type of taxpayer subsidy from the City of Edina. Please vote
"NO "! Thank you for your consideration.
Allene and Roy Burns
5708 Warden Ave.
Edina, MN. 55436
1
Susan Howl
Subject: FW: Colonial Church and Shelter Corp
REECEI ED
From: Susan [mailto;spetersen4 @comcast.net]
SEP 1 3 l0 i0
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 1:47 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Colonial Church and Shelter Corp
I am outraged that Colonial- Church /Shelter Corp is even asking to waive the $750,000 Park Dedication fee I say no,no
this is crazy. I also say no to allowing any other kind of taxpayer subsidy.They are the ones that want to build this complex
and the city is rezoning specifically for them which.i,dont agree on. We all have to pay taxes and isnt fair if it waived for
them.
1
Susan Howl
I
ubject: FW: City paid memberships to community organizations
.ttachments: publicexpdonationsdues _0809_statement.pdf; ATT26923561.htm RECEIVED
Dear City Council members:
SEP Z010
I watched a little of the Council meeting last night and the discussion regarding public purpose expenditures
related City paid memberships to community organizations. The League of MN Cities has a helpful publication
on public purpose expenditures, which can be found at www.Imc.org. The section on Chamber membership
with references to the AG opinion is on page 11.
The memo says:
Minn. Stat. § 469,191 State law authorizes cities "to appropriate not more than $50,000 annually to any incorporated development society or organization of the
A o. Op (i (orm, l letter for promoting, improving, or developing the economic and agricultural resources of the city." The attorney general's
1997) (informal letter P g. g' p g' p g
opinion to Staples) office has opined that while this authority allows a city to contribute up to $50,000 annually to a chamber of commerce, it does not allow a
See Pan III - I — Dues city to become a member of the chamber of commerce, or to pay dues to it.
The memo also provides information on dues in general, also on page 11:
A c. Op 92-a-30 ( Jan. According to the attorney general, cities cannot join or become members of "private" organizations, absent specific statutory authority -
29, 1986) even if there is s ecific authori to contribute to the organization. And without authorization for membership, there is no authority to pay
A. G. Op. (Jun. 27, p ty
1997) (informal letter for membership. However, as noted previously, instead of paying dues, a council may contract and pay for services generally provided by
opinion to Staples) an organization if doing so achieves one of council's powers.
Minn. Stat. § 471,96 All cities, counties, and towns may appropriate money for membership in county, regional, state, and national associations of a civic,
educational, or governmental nature. The associations must have as their purpose the betterment and improvement of municipal
governmental operations. This authorization also allows these public entities to participate in the meetings and activities of these
associations.
Minn. Stat. § 465 58 All cities and urban towns in Minnesota may appropriate money to pay dues to become members of the League of Minnesota Cities.
The same is stated in an Office of the State Auditor position, which is attached:
Memberships and Dues
There is no general authorization for cities to join "private" organizations; but there may be specific statutory or charter authority to join specific
organizations. For example, cities and urban towns in Minnesota may pay dues to become members of the League of Minnesota Cities. Similarly,
cities, counties, and towns may appropriate money for membership in county, regional, state, and national associations of a civic, educational, or
govemmental nature. These associations must have as their purpose the betterment and improvement of municipal governmental operations. This
authorization also allows public entities to participate in the meetings and activities of these associations.
The Attorney General's Office has determined that local units of government may not pay dues to a local chamber of commerce. However, because
cities may appropriate up to $50,000 to an incorporated development society or organization for promotional activities, a city could contract with a
local chamber of commerce for one of the purposes authorized by statute, such as promoting the city.2 The chamber's use of the public funds would
be limited to the statutorily authorized activities. We urge cities to review documents submitted by the chamber of commerce to verify that the money
is spent for contracted statutory purposes.
I hope this is helpful.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Janovy
Edina
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR
'; ��;.• -_ Gaya.' SUITE 500
525 PARK STREET
REBECCA OTTO SAINT PAUL, MN 55103 -2139
STATE AUDITOR
Statement of Position
Public Expenditures: Donations and Dues
(651) 296 -2551 (Voice)
(651) 296 -4755 (Fax)
state. auditor(a)state.nui.us (E -mail)
1- 800 -627 -3529 (Relay Service)
Public entities are often asked to give funds to support various groups and activities.
While the causes may be worthwhile, public entities need to be cautious when making
any financial commitments involving public funds.
Generally, in order to spend money on something, a public entity must have authority to
do so. Authority for an expenditure may be specifically stated in a statute or charter, or it
may be implied as necessary to do what an express power authorizes. In addition, the
expenditure must be for a "public purpose."
Gifts/Donations to Private Individuals /Organizations
Following these general principles, donations to people, non - profits, charities, or other
groups are not permitted unless they are based upon specific statutory or charter
authority. For example, the Minnesota Attorney General's Office has issued opinions
finding that cities have no authority to donate city funds to 4 -H Clubs, the Red Cross, or
the Boy Scouts. The assumption is that a gift of public funds to an individual or private
entity necessarily serves a private rather than a public purpose.
Before a public entity makes a contribution, it is important for that entity to determine
that it has specific authorization to make the expenditure. Here are some examples of
specific statutorily- authorized expenditures:
• Artistic Organizations. A county, city or town may appropriate money to
support artistic organizations.
• Historical Causes. A town and most cities may annually appropriate a specified
amount to a county historical society affiliated with, and approved by, the
Minnesota Historical Society. The Attorney General's Office recognizes that a
city can sponsor a centennial celebration. Cities and towns have express authority
to commemorate important and outstanding events in the city or town's history.
• Senior/Youth Centers. A county, city or town may appropriate money to
support the facilities, programs, and services of a public or private, not - for - profit
senior citizen center or youth center.
Reviewed: September 2008
Revised: September 2008 2007 -1017
An Equal Opportunity Employer
• Promotion. A city or urban town may appropriate up to $50,000 annually to an
incorporated development society or organization of this state, for promoting,
advertising, improving, or developing the economic and agricultural resources of
the city or urban town.' Similarly, 'a county may appropriate an unlimited amount
of money, to such an entity for promoting, advertising, improving or developing
the economic and agricultural resources of the county.
• Public Recreation Programs. Counties, cities, towns and school districts may
spend funds to operate programs of public recreation, recreational- facilities, and
playgrounds. These programs may be conducted independently or with any
nonprofit organization.,''
• Employee Recognition. Towns may spend funds to recognize volunteers,
service efforts, and retiring town officers.
• Community Celebrations. Towns may spend funds to host or support a
community celebration.
Public entities should consult with their attorney and cities should review the League of
Minnesota Cities research memo "Public Purpose Expenditures" for a more
comprehensive list of authorized city expenditures. See
littp://www.linc.org/niedia/dOCLimeiit/i /publicpLirposeexpeiiditures.pdt., , See also the
League of Minnesota Cities PowerPoint presentation on "Public Purpose Expenditures,"
http• / /www Imnc orv/ media / document/ I/ pubIicpur poseexpendituresac.pdf. If the public
entity wants to make other donations, the entity may wish to seek specific statutory
authority for them.
Additionally, public entities may enter into contracts with an organization to accomplish
tasks that the entity is authorized to perform by statute or charter. For example, a city
could not give money to the Boy Scouts for a recycling program, but the city could enter
a contract with the =Boy Scouts to do part of its recycling program._ The amount of money
paid to the BbyScouts must be related to the value of the services they provide to the
city.
Memberships and Dues
There is no general authorization for cities to join "private" organizations; but there may
be specific statutory or charter authority to join specific organizations. For example, .
cities and urban towns in Minnesota may pay dues to become members of. the League of
Minnesota Cities. Similarly, cities, counties, and towns may appropriate money for
membership in county, regional, state, and national associations of a civic, educational, or
governmental nature. These associations must have as their purpose the betterment and
improvement of municipal governmental operations. This authorization also allows
public entities to participate in the meetings and activities of these associations.
' In addition, Economic Development Authorities (EDAs) have authority to conduct activities advancing
the city and its economic development, and to carry out other public relations activities to promote the city
and its economic development.
Reviewed: September 2008. 2
Revised: September 2008 2007 -1017
The Attorney General's Office has determined that local units of government may not
pay dues to a local.chamber of commerce. However, because cities may appropriate up
to $50,000 to an incorporated development society or organization for promotional
activities, a city could contract with a local chamber of commerce for one of the purposes
authorized by statute, such. as promoting the city.2 The chamber's use of the public funds
would be limited to the ,statutorily authorized activities. We urge cities to review
documents submitted by the chamber of commerce to verify that the money is spent for
contracted statutory purposes.
Z An EDA has broader authority to join an official, industrial, commercial or trade association, or other
organization concerned with one of the EDA's authorized purposes.
Reviewed: September 2008 3
Revised: September 2008 2007 -1017
Gmail - 6033 Kellogg driveway apron
Dear Chad,
ii
Before the Pamela Park neighborhood street project started, wet alked
about the apron on my driveway. You told me there is supposedly a new
rule 11- miting the amount of cement'poured for the apron to
approximately 3 feet for.existing asphalt driveways. This seems to be
an arbitrary new rule as last year there were variances'on the length
of concrete poured-(see r driveway on 5940 Fairfax Avenue). The end
result, as I predicted, will -look cheap and shoddywith the asphalt
extension. There seems to be no reason the asphalt couldn't have been
cut to fit the,.same two cement segments that were poured on all the
cement driveways.
If this were work.I contracted myself, I certainly would expect and
would negotiate a discount for the concession we have had to make by
accepting a driveway that is not to our specifications. Accordingly,
I expect that my bill will reflect this fact. I understand that as
home owners, we pay only a portion of the cost of the entire project,
but we still are paying out of pocket and should receive service to
our satisfaction.
Regards,
Eric and Constance Fantin
6033 Kellogg Avenue South
Edina, MN 55424
cc: MayorJivwHovland (via7,US Post)
__ __ _________
Page 1 of 1
Eric Fantin <straigh8 @gmaiI -com>
Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:13 PM
https: / /mail. google. com /mail / ?ui= 2 &ik =b571 e561 al &view= pt&search= sent &th= 12ad4b9a... 9/2/2010
September 10,,2010
REGENED
SEP 16 2010
Mayor James Hovland
City of Edina
Edina City Hall:
4801 West 'SOth Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Proposed Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina,
Section 3
Dear Mayor.Hovland,
We are writing in regards to the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail,
Section 3. The sidewalk that would be displaced is a well =used sidewalk. In. addition to
the many able- bodied walkers, there are al few of us who use wheelchairs.
Please consider our safety as you look at the proposaf'before you. We are
leery of bicyclists weaving in between the,walkers and wheelers as their hearing and
speed is greater than ours.
I enjoyed seeing you at Braemar golf course this summer.
Mike Ites Frona Ites
�� l� er
Comcaste 10 Rivet Cable
10 River Park Plaza
St Paul, MN 55107
RECEIVED
SEP 16 1010
September 15, 2010
Dear Community Leader:
Starting September 20, 2010, Comcast is changing the names of its video, Internet and
voice services in your community to XFINITY TV, XFINITY INTERNET and XFINITY
VOICE.
XFINITY represents Comcast's tremendous investment in our network and products in
the Twin -Cities Region to offer our subscribers more HD, more speed, more choices and
more control than ever before. Our customers can enjoy the best entertainment and
communications choices whenever they want, wherever they are and however they
want.
• XFINITY TV offers triple the HD channels, increasing to 5,000+ HD choices, and
the best HD picture quality available, as well as 50 to 70 multi - cultural channels
and approaching 20,000+ Video On Demand choices.
• FANCAST XFINITY TV offers thousands of movies, top shows and other content
available online, at home or on the go.
• XFINITY INTERNET offers 50Mbps speeds with 100+ Mbps coming soon and
even.faster in the fixture.:
• XFINITY VOICE which let our customers' TV, phone and Internet work
seamlessly together in new and innovative ways.
While the names of our products are changing to XFINITY TV, XFINITY INTERNET and
XFINITY VOICE, the Comcast name will not change. The names of any Comcast
companies with which you have agreements, including franchise agreements, remain
the same.
We are pleased to have this opportunity to introduce you to XFINITY TV, XFINITY
INTERNET and XFINITY VOICE. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
matter, or any matter, please feel free to contact me at 651- 493 -5774.
Sincerely,
Emmett Coleman
Vice President, Government Affairs
Comcast -Twin Cities Region
(Enclosure)
XFINITY Fact Sheet
• XFINITY is the new brand for Comcast's technology platform, products and
services. (Comcast remains the name of the company.)
• XFINITY represents the future of our company and it's a promise to
customers that we'll keep innovating.
• XFINITY is about offering our customers more HD, more speed, more choice
and more control over their services.
• XFINITY is the culmination of years of work to transition Comcast's network
and products to a platform that provides:
o 50Mbps downloads today increasing to 100+ Mbps and even faster in
the future.
o 100+ HD Channels, 5,000+ HD choices, and the best HD picture
quality available.
o 50 to 70 multi - cultural channels.
o Approaching 20,000+ Video On Demand choices.
o FANCAST XFINITY TV, with 19,000+ movies, top shows and other
content available online, at home or on the go.
o New cross - platform and mobile features like: remote DVR, Universal
Caller ID, an interactive home telephone, apps for iPhones and the
ability to use a remote control to order products and services while
watching TV.
• When we launch XFINITY in a market, we'll rebrand our products: XFINITY
TV, XFINITY Voice and XFINITY Internet. For clarity, below is an overview of
our new brands:
Master brand Ccomcast.
Service sub -brand f in ity
Serviceoiferings XFIPJITYTV XFINITY INTERNET XFINITY VOICE
• The transition to XFINITY is already well underway across the country. It has
rolled out in a number of markets including: Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore,
Washington D.C., Chicago, Portland, Seattle, Hartford, Augusta,
Chattanooga, parts of the Bay Area and San Francisco, with more markets to
come.
• The launch of XFINITY represents Comcast's investment to enhance our
products and services so our customers can enjoy the best entertainment and
communications choices wherever they are, whenever and however they
want.
,:1V
Mayor James Hovland
Edina City Hall
4801 W 50th St.
Edina,_Mn.55424
SEP 1 6
Sept. 8.2010
I have lived at Manor Homes in
Edina for 16 yrs. I stringently agree
with the letter written to you By
Kenneth Kadash and the attached
"Points of Concern - Sec. 3"
The traffic issue on Lincoln Drive,
the 19 road ways for residence exiting
on to Lincoln Dr. and the limited view
of car traffic because of the curves
is at times alarming-. A clear View of
cyclist will.even be more difficult.
Many that bike this road do so at
excessive speed with no concern for
resident exists.
There.will be an accident and some
people will be killed. It will too
late_ to undo what is proposed.
Approval of Sec. 2 will avoid
this.
Jam s M. Grogan
n �
l�11
Q ~/
ne F
186a
RE PO RPRECO M M E N ®ATI O N
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
VII. A. -1
DEBRA MANGEN
❑ Action
From:
CITY CLERK
❑ Discussion
® Information
Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010
Subject:
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS
INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received
after the packets were delivered to you.
Susan Howl
RECEIVED
Dear Mayor and Edina Council Members, SEp.2 12010
I have lived I Eden Prairie both before and after Scott Neal became our City
Manager, I just wanted to drop you a line an let you know what a remarkable.job he
has done for the residents of Eden Prairie. Over the years I have been very involved. in
a number of issues facing the City of Eden Prairie. My. volunteer work has, taken me in
front'of the _City Council on a number of occasions, and I have had a chance'' to work
directly with City Staff on some of these issues. It has been, my observation,that as a
result of Scott Neal's leadership, the City staff people have been able to be very
effective in getting the City's business done,. and the City Staff are very professional in
the way they interact with the public. Mr. Neal seems to be able to get everyone
working together happily towards a common goal. I have'enjoyed, working with the City
Council during Mr. Neal's tenure as well. A has been my observation that because of
Mr. Neal's hard work, the City Council members have an easier time doing their job as
well. ,Not all Cities have the benefit of a talented manager like him. And I have noticed
that it can be pure misery for cities that don't. I think you will have-the great good
fortune to find, as I did, that things just work more smoothly with Scott Neal at the
helm. He is a talented person, with a great vision of how a city can work. You are lucky
to have hired him. I will be very sorry to see him go.
Lisa Rolf
14 year Eden Prairie Resident
Susan Howl I t.
From: Susan A. Hanson (mailto:suehanson @vklaw.net]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:45 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Please distribute to City Leaders RECEIVED
TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager SEP 2 01010
Honorable Mayor James Hovland
Council Member Joni Bennett
Council Member Mary Brindle
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Ann Swenson
Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown
Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter
Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer
Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest
Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel
Planning Commissioner Julie Risser
Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer
Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder
Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton
Cary Teague, Planning Director
Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director
As a resident and taxpayer in Edina, we strongly encourage you to amend Edina building code, 850.11
Section H. The current 1 -foot elevation height restriction may be applicable in some neighborhoods (e.g.
Country Club and South Harriett Park), but is restrictive and a detriment to many other neighborhoods.
We support reasonable building ordinances that protect historical neighborhoods and the architectural
integrity of new building, but 850.11 Section H is too limiting and extreme. It does not take into
consideration problems with much of the aging housing stock and irregular lot issues with a large
percentage of homes in Edina.
Instead, we would suggest that you amend the code to include language previously suggested by City
Planner, Cary Teague to read, ".....The first floor elevation may be raised up to four feet, only if it is
necessary because of high ground water or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements."
Please consider our request.
Sue & Paul Hanson
4520 Garrison Lane
Edina, MN 55425
9520920 -7930
RECEIVED
SEP 2 0 2010
;;A Metropolitan Council
v
September 17, 2010
Dear Mayor:
The inflow and infiltration (1 /1) of clear water into local and regional wastewater pipes is a
waste of financial resources and an environmental threat. But with the help and
participation of communities across the region, the continuing effort to eliminate clear
water from the wastewater treatment system is a big success. In fact, the 47
communities identified as having excess 1/1 are making such good progress that we've
been able to avoid surcharges on municipal wastewater fees in all but one instance.
Additional good news stems from Metro Council action that gives communities more
time to complete mitigation work. The Council, in fact, will continue the program on a
more permanent basis to ensure mitigation work continues to prevent clear water from
entering the wastewater system and using up needed capacity.
The decision to continue the program on an ongoing basis reflects the region's progress
to date, as well as a commitment to eliminating excess 1/1 well into the future. We expect
regional savings will amount to hundreds of millions of dollars, helping to maintain
regional sewer rates that are among the lowest in the country.
The Council approved changes to the 1/1 reduction program on Sept. 8, based on the
recommendations of a task force that I appointed last year. The task force included local
government staff, Metro Cities and Council Member Wendy Wulff, who served as chair.
It was charged with determining how best to implement a "demand charge," beginning
in 2013, on those communities that didn't meet 1/1 reduction goals. As originally
conceived, the demand charge would have been used to help pay the costs of
addressing 1/1 at the regional level and building additional capacity at considerable
expense.
But the task force recommended, and the Council agreed, that communities need more
time to continue their mitigation work. We also concluded that slower growth and less
flow means we'll have sufficient capacity for more years than previously anticipated,
which gives us more time.
I am very pleased with the outcome. Changes to the program create further incentive for
voluntary compliance, and impose demand charges only as a last resort and on a case -
by -case basis. Specifically,. changes to the 1/1 program will:
• Continue the 1/1 reduction program indefinitely, recognizing that mitigation at the
source is the most cost effective and efficient approach to reducing 1 /I.
• Allow some communities to defer some 2011 1/1 reduction work until 2012.
• Eliminate a systematic 2013 demand charge and impose a demand charge only
as a last resort on communities that do not implement an effective 1/1 reduction
www.metrocouncil.org
390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 a Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
program, or if regulations and /or regulatory permits require Council action to
ensure compliance. The charge, if implemented, would be used to cover the cost
of building offline storage to handle excessive peak flows.
• Improve the methodology for determining excess 1 /1.
To date, communities identified as having excess 1/1 have spent nearly $50 million to
reduce 1 /I. The Council estimates we would have to spend closer to $1 billion to expand
wastewater collection and treatment capacity to handle excess 1 /1. The success of this
program and the considerable savings to taxpayers is the result of the hard work and
commitment of metro communities.
also want to thank Council Member Wulff for her work and dedication to this initiative,
as well as all those who participated on the task force. We should all feel very good
about the savings to the region achieved. through the efforts of your communities. If you
have any questions about the program or recent changes, I encourage you to contact
Bryce Pickart, MCES Assistant General Manager, at 651.602.1091, or Jason Willett,
MCES Finance Director, at 651.602.1196.
Sincerely,
. 3 a-rojjv
Peter Bell, Chair
c: City Manager /Administrator
John Keprios
Edina Park Board Director
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50'h St.
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Nine Mile Creek Trail
Dear John,
September 15, 2010
Parks were set aside to be used and enjoyed by everyone ... not a select few.
RECEIVED
SEP 2 0 2010
We can leave no greater legacy to future generations then to expand a park system that
provides access to outdoor recreation to all and at the same time protects and improves
vital natural areas. We have the opportunity. now with the proposed Three Rivers Park
District walking and biking trail along Nine Mile Creek in Edina.
I have walked the entire ' length of Nine Mile Creek that flows through Edina. In many
places it is just a drainage ditch. The creek is on the state's impaired water list because
its muddy flow doesn't support the fish species that a creek of this type should.
Nine Mile Creek Watershed is proposing to restore Nine Mile' Creek through the City
which may include constructing gentle curves thus making a natural habitat for fish and
wildlife. If a Creek -based trail route is chosen, the Park District and Watershed District
will collaborate efforts and conduct stream restoration in conjunction with trail
construction. The staff at Three Rivers Park District are. professionals in designing paths
that are ecologically sound as well as taking into account and respecting near -by homes.
f
I have biked most of the existing Three Rivers Park District Bike and Walking Trails.
Along the way I have observed deer, turkeys, ducks, egrets, song birds and a turtle laying
her eggs all living in harmony with the trail.
The trail would provide safe and convenient biking and walking routes connecting homes
to work places, schools, recreation and shopping.
The proposed path through Edina is a critical part of a larger regional trail system,
connecting the western suburbs and beyond. Is the City of Edina going to have the path
stop at its borders thus making us an island?
Some have proposed that the trail be put on city streets. Biking on streets creates a safety
problem and the recreational value would be lost.
Public health advocates urge us to get more exercise. " Many studies show that people
living in walkable neighborhoods walk and cycle, more for recreation and transportation
and are less likely to be obese ". (Jim Sallies, Director of Childhood Obesity Prevention
Group)
The Three Rivers Park District reports that there are typically six Police Officers and six
PSO's on duty at any given time within the park district. These numbers can vary day to
day, depending on special events.
The Park District has not had any violent crimes such as rape, robbery or assaults occur
on the Park District, Regional Trail System.
The Park District will use a variety of funding sources to pay for the development of the
proposed trail including its own bonding authority, regional grants from the Metropolitan
Council, State grants and Federal grants,
"Each year Edina residents pay more than 3.5 million in taxes to the Three Rivers Park
District yet the City Of Edwa has no trails or other district owned park facilities within
our borders ". - (Star &.;Tribune, January 3 is', 2009)
If we -don't act at this time to approve the Three Rivers Park District path proposed along
Nine Mile Creek in'Edina, it will be a lost opportunity to improve the lives of future
generations.
I urge your support.
Respectfully, ,
Steve Sando (68 year Edina resident)
5133 Juanita Ave
MN 55424
(952) 927 -7830
RECEIVED
SEP 2 0 2010
FROM: EDINA CHEMICAL HEALTH PARTNERS
RE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 at 7 PM- Edina City Hall (50th St. & HWY 100)
This Edina City Council Meeting will include a public hearing where people can speak.
YOU CAN EITHER SPEAK AT THE MEETING - OR ATTEND TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT.
AT THE MEETING THE MAYOR WILL ASK ANYONE WITH COMMENTS TO,COME TO THE
MICROPHONE. YOU WILL HAVE 3 MINUTES TO SPEAK. OTHERWISE, YOU_ R PRESENCE
IN THE AUDIENCE IS GREAT TOO!
The Edina City Council held their first discussion on revising the temporary intoxicating license
ordinance. During the discussion, it was decided to revise the draft again, so now it is being re-
written and I've asked one of the council members to let me know when it will be'available to
review. This all started because St. Pat's served alcohol at some eventand someone complained
that they were not licensed. They found out that the current temporary alcohol licensefor
intoxicating beverages (like wine) is only issued to four organizations: Edina Chamber of
Commerce, 50th & France Business and Professional Assoc., the Edina Community Foundation
and the City of Edina. Now St. Pat's wants to be legal. This ordinance change will open the door
to alcohol sales for any qualified non - profit to get a temporary permit up to 2 times per year.
Here is the summary of what they talked about: Since compliance checks can't be done for these
types of licenses (time limited events, at most twice a year), the council emphasized the
importance of keeping underage kids from access to alcohol. Wristbands will be listed as a
suggestion for the non - profits applying for a permit. These would be put on the buyers after they
have proved age with ID. The current ordinance already requires certain information to obtain the
permit, like the plan for the event, the location, what and how will be served, and security in place.
Also'the sales must be in an enclosed area.
There was great concern expressed that if underage youth are volunteering as servers, what
kinds of protections will be in place for them. Additionally, how do we keep the event safe for all
involved? (not serving to obviously intoxicated individuals etc)
The revised ordinance will have the following additional provisions (as discussed last night)
Identify a manager for the alcohol portion of the event.
Off -duty police officer on site. (The officer can be from any community, not just Edina, that way, if
a church has a member who is a police officer and wants to volunteer their time to the event,
they can do so, without having to pay the officer.)
Require that food be offered as well.
No drinking on the job.
Check all IDs for people under age 30.
No underage youth (under 21) allowed inside area enclosed for alcohol sales.
No sales to obviously intoxicated individuals.
No drinking alcohol on the job.
One drink per purchase.
No drink specials.
The booth will close at least 30 minutes (ideally 60 minutes) prior to the event ending.
Here is the video from the Edina City Council mtg where the revision was
discussed: http:// edina .granicus.com /MediaPlayer.php ?view id =3 &clip id =1041 and move the
bar to 32:25 you will hear the discussion about the revision of the law on temporary licenses for
sales of intoxicating beverages.
Kathy Iverson
Edina Chemical Health Partners
Susan Howl
From: Rieckhoff, Judy [ maiIto :]udyRieckhoff @edinarealty.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 6:17 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Code 850.11 Section H - Please Distribute to City Leaders. RECEIVED
TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager SEP 2 9 2910
Honorable Mayor James Hovland
Council Member Joni Bennett
Council Member Mary Brindle
Council Member Scot Housh
Council Member Ann Swenson
Planning Commissioner :Stephen Brown
Planning Comnmissioner Jeff Carpenter
Planning .Commissioner Michael Fischer
Planning. Commissioner Arlene Forrest
Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel
Planning Commissioner Julie Risser
Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer
Planning' Commissioner Michael Schroeder
Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton
Cary Teague, Planning Director
Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director
From: Judy and Bill Rieckhoff, 7212 Monardo Lane, Edina,MN 55435, 952 - 927 -7939
As 40 -year residents and taxpayers in Edina, we strongly encourage you to amend Edina building code, 850.11 Section
H. The current 1 -foot elevation height restriction is unfairly impacting some homeowners where special circumstances
are present.
We were made aware of this situation by our friends Jeff Miller and Connie Corrino and we believe they have come up
with a reasonable solution to it. We endorse their suggestion to amend the code with language previously suggested by
City Planner, Cary Teague, .....The first floor elevation may be raised up to four feet, only if it is necessary because of high
ground water or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements."
Our long -time residency and work as Realtors in the community has given us an appreciation for the city's solid property
values. We know we need strong protective_ codes and ordinances to maintain them but we also know that
improvement of the aging housing stock is necessary as well. Codes and ordinances need to have the flexibility to
accommodate reasonable. changes that allow homeowners to appropriately update and upgrade their properties. The
proposed amendment is a case in point. Please give it your thoughtful consideration.
Sincerely,
Judy and Bill Rieckhoff
Judy Rieckhoff
ff.
Edina Realty
952 - 927 -1616 Direct
612 - 849 -6626 Cellular
Susan Howl
'rom: Avelina Schneider [maiilto:avel_schn @msn.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Three Rivers Bicycle /Walking Trail Along Nine Mile Creek
To: Mayor James Hovland
Council Member Joni Bennett
Council Member Mary Brindle
Council Member Scott Housh
Council Member Ann Swenson
From: Avelina T. Schneider
6115 Lincoln Drive #244
Edina, MN 55436
Phone: 952 - 933 -6332
E -mail: avel schn@msn.com
Re: Three Rivers
Bicycle /Walking Trail Along Nine Mile Creek
Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen,
,RECEIVED
SEP 1 d 2010
I would like my name to be' added to those opposed to the Trail option known as Section 3 along
�incolnNemon Drive from Caribou Coffee to the Vernon/Gleason stop light.
I walk this sidewalk every single day at least once, more often twice or three times with my small ,dog. This is a
very busy street/thoroughfare already with the Caribou strip mall, United.Health, many town, house and
condominium communities, a church, double,homes and many side streets feeding into it. Many automobiles
use it, some because it is the way to their residences, some because they work at United. Health (I don't even
know the number in their workforce at that location, but it has a huge parking lot and ramp and it is totally full
every day), some to do business at the strip mall and many, many who want to avoid the Hwy 169 - Crosstown
traffic.
The sidewalk is also very, very busy. Many people such as myself walk their pets .there two or three times a
day. I have seen disabled adults walking along the sidewalk with their aides or caregivers. I have seen a
disabled child with an aide /caregiver. There is a man who drives his power wheelchair there on most nice days.
Many people who are just "elderly ". walk there as well. 'Employees from United Health walk/jog there during
their lunch hour and many walk 'along there as they take a cigarette break. 1n short, the sidewalk is already busy
to, capacity and is not compatible to bike'.traff c, not even on the street, much less sharing a path with.the people
who live and work there. It would be too dangerous to try to put bikes and walkers on the same path with just a
yellow line down the middle. The width of the street and sidewalk areas are also too narrow to accommodate
this added bike trail and, to widen it would'add unecessary risk to, current users and destroy the little
neighborhood ambience we.now enjoy.
I. also take my dog to Walnut Creek Park almost every day. It is my chief alternate choice of places to take
tim. The option known as Section 2 is -a much more satisfactory one. I walk in that neighborhood as well and
know it very well. While I know the people along the route will be unhappy, it will impact far fewer homes and
virtually no street traffic. Families with children use the park quite a.bit, but if I understand the plan, the path
would only go along the south side. If I understand the plan correctly, it looks like it would only share that
1
south side for maybe 100 yards. I think it's possible they could build a separate path alongside the_existing one,
like at Bredesen. There is room. A boardwalk through the wetlands would make a lovely ride for the cyclists.
I hope addressing this letter to all of you is acceptable. If each of you wants a letter, just let me know, I will be
happy to write to you individually.
If you would like to contact me for any reason, please call or write.
Thank you for your consideration,
Avelina T. Schneider
Minutes of the
Edina Park Board
July 13, 2010
Edina City Hall, Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Kenney, Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Randy
Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Ben Pobuda, Ellen Jones, Louise Segreto
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lough
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios; Ed-MacHolda, Janet Canton, Doug Bauman
I. APPROVAL OF THE' APRIL 13, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES,
Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL •13, 2010 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. EHS Hockey Alumni Proposal - Casey Hankinson, former Edina Hockey player,
presented an idea to the Park Board regarding Braemar Arena. He explained to the
Park Board that there's an alumni component of Edina Hockey which started the
"Willard Ikola" golf tournament approximately four years ago. He stated that they
have been raising money to update Braemar Arena. In addition, they have also given
approximately $10,000 to the "Willard Ikola Scholarship Fund" which goes to players
on the Edina Varsity Hockey teams. Mr. Hankinson pointed out that they would like
to update the tribute to the champions of Edina Hockey at Braemar Arena. Their
proposal is to have a nice mural with some images of Coach Ikola, old hockey jerseys,
etc., and give it a new updated life. He added that they would also be honoring
Edina's ten'state championship teams. He explained that their thought is to have it
Iodated in the west arena as you walk in.
Mr. Hankinson pointed out that everything would be privately funded and that they
would probably be doing it in phases with Phase t being the mural and images. He
noted that phase II could possibly be the component with Coach Ikola as well as
updating some of the pictures at Braemar Arena.
Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks it's a great idea and thanked the EHS Alumni for
putting this together. He commented that it's not only a great tribute to Coach Ikola
but to the rest of the teams and thanked them on_.behalf of the Park Board for putting
the time into this project. x
Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Meyer if this has been brought to the School Board to look at.
Mr. Meyer replied that there wasn't a formal vote on it but that there was some brief
discussion and support by consensus on behalf.of the School Board for the concept.
1
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Doug Bauman, Arena Manager, did bring
the concept to the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club as well as the Edina
Hockey Association and both organizations support the concept.
Todd Fronek MOVED TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL FROM THE EHS HOCKEY
ALUMNI ASSOCIATION. Ellen Jones SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. Veteran's Memorial Committee — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that there are
now 11 members willing to serve on the official Veteran's Memorial Committee. He
indicated that they recently had their "organizational meeting" where they basically
gave their visions and views of where they are headed as well as find out what
everyone's level of support and commitment is. He noted that they were very pleased
with the meeting. Mr. Keprios indicated that what he is looking for from the Park
Board is the approval of the concept to move forward with this official committee so
they can begin to deliberate on the proper site, location, design, etc.
Rob Presthus MOVED THAT THE PARK BOARD SUPPORT STAFF
RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE
VETERANS MEMORIAL CONCEPT BY APPROVING THE FORMAL
COMMITTEE OF ELEVEN VOLUNTEERS AS PRESENTED. Todd Fronek
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
C. Community Advisory Team Report — Ms. Jones informed the Park Board that on June
18th representatives from the Community Advisory Team presented their findings to
the Edina City Council, no formal actions were requested or made. She noted that on
June 29th the Community Advisory Team met again to discuss what their next step
should be which it was agreed to create a final written report that would be presented
to the City Council. It was also decided that they would seek approval from the City
Council to apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Livable Community Grant. Ms.
Jones pointed out that if they are awarded the grant it would cover expenses associated
with developing a technical plan for this small area. That grant would cover planning
issues related to transportation, land use, utilities infrastructure, financing and market
analysis. She stated that on July 6`h the City Council granted permission to apply for
this grant and added that the grants are awarded in the fall. She commented that the
Community Advisory Team is planning a meeting again soon to review the final report
and that she thinks they are wrapping up.
D. Park Board Liaison to the BETF — Mr. Hulbert informed the Park Board that the Bike
Edina Task Force is looking for a liaison from the Park Board. Ms. Jones stated that
she would be willing to do it.
III. UPDATES FROM STAFF
A. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Three
Rivers Park District has completed their second of two Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW) open houses. The purpose of the open houses was to educate the
public about the findings of the EAW as well as a lot of statistics. He noted that he
thought the open houses went very well and there were a lot of good comments and a
lot of feedback. Mr. Keprios indicated that there was a 30 day comment period for
the EAW which ends tomorrow. He explained that the next step is everything goes to
the Three Rivers Board of Commissioners to look at all of the input from the
community. At that time they will either accept or not accept the EAW and will then
make a determination to see if they will need to conduct any further environmental
impact studies.
Mr. Fronek stated that in looking at some of the emails, a lot of them suggested that
Route 5F was added late to the game and felt there may be some funny business
going on regarding how the route was established. He indicated that in regards to
financing it's clear it's going to be very, very expensive but it was his understanding
that Three Rivers had the financing somewhat developed and taken care of. He asked
Mr. Keprios to comment on those two items.
Mr. Keprios replied that Three Rivers Park District staff proposed alternate Route 5F
late in the process. He noted that Three Rivers Park District staff felt that alternate
route 5F was bound to happen eventually based on the data they received from the
results of the EAW. Mr. Keprios explained that he felt it was bad timing when Three
Rivers Park District staff presented it at the last Community Assessment team
meeting. He noted that the volunteers were understandably upset because they were
told at the start that they would not be entertaining any alternate routes through the
process. Mr. Keprios commented that they may have to look at some other alternates
if some turn out to be not feasible due to social, economic and/or environmental
reasons or other reasons. He commented that it is possible that some segments might
fall off the map and they will have to look at another route.
Mr. Keprios explained as far as the financing is concerned it is very expensive and he
thinks part of the 5F was a way to try to find a way to reduce some of the expenses.
He indicated that as far as where the money comes from there is some very good
detailed information available on the Questions and Answers section on the Three
Rivers Park website. He pointed out that the majority of funding to build the large
bridges over the Crosstown Highway and Highway 100 will come from federal
dollars through federal grants. Other funding will include bonding and the Three
Rivers Park District's CIP which are tax dollars from all of Hennepin County and not
just Edina. He noted that it's not a special assessment but it's essentially taxation
through all of Hennepin County which they draw their revenue from. In addition, a
lot will be Minnesota State dollars. Mr. Keprios commented that it will likely take 10
to 15 years to get it all done.
B. Centennial Lakes Farmer's Market - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the
Farmer's Market has been successful beyond what they expected. He noted that the
first day several of the vendors sold out of their products so many of them doubled up
for this past Thursday and they still ran out. Mr. Keprios indicated that a lot of
people are showing up early to be assured the product will be available. Therefore,
they are very strict with their vendors to not sell anything until 3:00 pm because they
don't want people showing up at 2:00 pm and waiting in line for an hour. He
commented they have had very few problems and for the most part everything has
been very, very positive.
IV. PARK BOARD COMMENTS
A. Memorial Policies - Ms. Jones asked Mr. Keprios if there is a policy on memorials.
Mr. Keprios replied there is a Donations Policy which was approved by the Park
Board and City Council about a decade ago. He explained that permanent plaques are
no longer allowed in the park system unless the donation is equal to or greater than
$5,000 either singularly or collectively in a group. Mr. Keprios stated that as far as
naming things and memorials there really is no policy that addresses that specifically.
Mr. Hulbert indicated that with the different requests they've had this year for the
Flying Disc Championship and the May Term Project as well as a couple of requests
for memorials, maybe now would be a good time for the Park Board to have a
separate work session to talk about the policy and whether or not they may want to
create a new policy.
Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks it would be time well spent if the topic was more
naming of facilities or parks because there already is a policy in place for donations.
He noted that the last time this came to the Park Board and ultimately the City
Council the resolve that the City Council had at the time was that they would prefer to
deal with them on a case by case basis. Mr. Keprios commented that there are
policies out there in communities that are all over the map with all different types of
stipulations. He stated that he would be happy to have a work session but would need
a little more direction from the Park Board on how they would like him to proceed.
Ms. Segreto indicated that she would find it helpful and would like to talk about
memorials during these times of economic shortfalls and budget constraints. She
noted that it's hard to decline any contribution that someone wants to make and
wondered whether they could aggregate contributions so that maybe the plaque
wouldn't carry just one name but it would be an aggregation of perhaps five people
just to get more money coming in. It's just a thought. Mr. Hulbert replied that he
thinks it's a thought that's worthwhile to get into a little bit. He indicated that he
thinks it might be a good idea to throw more ideas out on the table. Mr. Keprios
clarified that the Park Board would like the work session to address memorials,
donations and naming of facilities /parks.
Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if he would distribute the current policies to the Park
Board so that they can understand the framework that is currently in place. He noted
that then they can come back with some questions and then maybe touch on the
naming aspect as well. He commented that they are not going to get through all of
this in a single session but they certainly can build on a foundation so that they have
some basis for future decisions.
4
It was decided to hold a work session an-hour before the August 91h Park Board
meeting.
B. Edina Aquatic Center Hours of Operation - Mr: Meyer indicated that he has been
hearing some negative comments about the pool closing earlier this year and that
there are some swim clubs using the pool. He asked what was the evolution of this
issue. He noted that one of his concerns is the impact that it's had on families who
aren't able to get to, the pool until 6:30 pm. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason
they decided to close the pool an hour earlier was not a directive from the City `
Council but it was a general directive to try to find ways to make cuts, savings and
:efficiencies, across the board.. He stated that he thought it was a wise move on Mr:
MacHolda's part to make that ex to close earlier.' Mr. Keprios stated
that there are true savings there and -yes, they are receiving some negative feedback
and will probably have to reevaluate it for next year.
Mr. MacHolda explained his reasoning for making the decision he did. He noted that
in 2009 part-time seasonal staff's wages were frozen and in 2010 .their wages
remained frozen. He_ indicated that when looking at hours compared to neighboring
facilities to'his.surprise Edina was open later than St. Louis Park, Bloomington and
Richfield which cl6se'at.7:00 and 7:30 depending on the day and month. He noted
that by closing an1our earlier, in June, and July and half an hour earlier in August
there would be a savings. He added that it takes approximately 22 to 24 people to run
the facility at approximately $10.00 per person/hour, so it is a big savings.
Mr. MacHolda indicated that once they made the move to change the hours, due to
the economic times, instead of making further cutbacks they decided to generate a
little bit of revenue. Therefore they went knocking on competitive swim team doors
because with swim teams only one employee needs to be working. He noted that they
didn't have to go as deep with their cutbacks, because of the revenue they found in the
evening by the.swim teams. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that they did look at:other
things but they didn't want to compromise what they currently provide to their
patrons.
Mr. Meyer stated that perhaps maybe one or two nights a week they could stay open a
little longer. He noted that he thinks the biggest thing was it was a surprise to them
even though the new hours were posted and publicized. Unfortunately; it was
probably one of those things that they did not notice until they were, at the facility and
it was closing an hour earlier than what they had become accustomed to.. Mr.
MacHolda indicated that he wishes there would have been a better way of
communicating this and hopes that they will be able to reinstate it next year.
Mr. MacHolda commented that they have thought about extending the hours on
Friday and Saturday nights and call them family nights since swim teams are using
the facility Monday through Thursday but is has not happened.
5
C. John Valliere - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that John Valliere, Manager of
Braemar Golf Course, gave his letter of resignation today for retirement. He
indicated that it will be effective August 27, 2010. He commented that Mr. Valliere
has been working for the City of Edina for over 40 years and noted that he will be
dearly missed.
Meeting adjourned at 7:45 pm
2
Minutes ofthe
Edina Park Board
Work Session
August 9, 20 10
Edina City Hall, Community Room
r
MEMBERS; PRESENT: _Todd.Fronek; Dan Peterson, Bill Lough, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert,
Keeya Steel, Louise Segreto
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jennifer Kenney,. Rob Presthus, Ben Pobuda, Ellen Jones
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
I. DONATIONS/MEMORIALS POLICY
Mr. Hulbert informed the Park Board that he thought it would be a. good idea to have a
work session io discuss policies for donations and memorials. He indicated that during
the past year they have had two memorials. One was for Timothy Nunn, a 14 year old
who passed away unexpectedly. The second was for Dwayne Lindberg, a member of the
Bike Edina Task Force, who passed away. He noted that currently there is a
donations /memorial policy in place with specific dollar amounts.
Mr. Hulbert indicated that in some cities. they literally have a catalog where if you donate
X amount you can get a park bench or X amount you can get a water fountain, etc. He
commented that he also thought it might be a way for the city to prioritize items that are
important to them so that they are not wasting time and resources on _certain donated
items that maybe aren't important to them.
Mr. Hulbert pointed out that as an example there were some challenges with the Timothy
Nunn memorials. The neighborhood raised money to surprise the Nunn Family with
improvements -at the York Park baseball field where Timothy liked to play ball. Mr.
Hulbert noted there were some beautiful improvements made. However, there was a
large concrete structure, which staff did a nice job of putting together, but it looks like a
tombstone. He commented that in theory something like that could be there for 300 years
unless. someone moves it, whereas if it were a park bench with a 20 year life cycle it
would naturally turn over on its own. Mr. Hulbert pointed out that some cities will say in
their policies that things that -:are going to be constructed should. not be in open
spaces /right -of -ways and;should be made out of green materials; etc. He stated that he
would, like. to come up' with a way that people who want to make a donation to the city
have a frame of reference of what is within reason and what is asking too much.
Ms. Segreto stated that she thinks directing giving would be a great idea because she
thinks a lot of people who are trying to make a donation can't come up with an idea and
if they had a wish list maybe that would help. Mr. Keprios replied he has thought about
that; however, for most people to give $5,000 scares them away. He noted that to come
up with a wish list- that's. affordable is very challenging. He commented that what he has
1
learned through the years is that what's most important to those who want to donate is a
permanent plaque because it's part of their grieving process. It really doesn't matter what
the amenity is, they want the plaque.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he did make some mistakes in the process with
the Nunn Memorial. He explained that when the neighborhood approached him about
making improvements at the baseball field in memory of Tim Nunn to surprise the
family. Mr. Keprios informed them that it's never going to be a scheduled field; it's a
minimally maintained small area. He also informed them that it's a minimum $5,000
donation to have a plaque. The neighborhood raised the money and it went through the
Edina Foundation. He explained that it was supposed to be a surprise but word leaked
out and when construction started the Nunns stopped the contractor on the field and told
him to stop working because it was supposed to be a grass infield to look more like a
little league baseball field and not a multi - purpose baseball /softball field like we have at
other small unscheduled fields. Mr. Keprios noted that the grieving parents came in his
office in tears and he tried his best to make it a positive experience for all involved. He
said that his first lesson was you can't make these things a secret; you must bring the
family into it at the beginning of the process. He noted that he did make sure the family
was aware that it was not going to be called the Timm Nunn Field to which they agreed
"In Memory of was fine. He explained that to name a park or facility requires Park
Board and City Council approval. Mr. Keprios noted that his second mistake was when a
staff member, who is really good with concrete, drew up a plan to put the plaque on
which the Nunn family really liked. In hindsight he felt that he should have gone with his
original plan to place the plaque on a flat rock surrounded by flowers. He noted that they
had to redo what they already did to have the field the way the Nunns wanted and so they
had to get involved in change order pricing with the hired contractor and commented that
there were some other challenges when dealing with a grieving family.
Mr. Hulbert asked if having some policy would have helped in that situation. For
example, it cannot say anything more than "In memory of or it can't be any more than
so many inches, or you need to pick from specific items, or the city prioritizes what they
want to have done. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks part of these things should be left
to staff to deal with; however, we admittedly may make some mistakes but will hopefully
learn from those mistakes.
Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios what the Park Board can do to help. Mr. Keprios replied
there currently is a policy in place that helps him. Mr. Meyer asked what tools could
have been in place that could have helped with the Dwayne Lindberg Memorial. Mr.
Keprios responded that the Lindberg Memorial plaque was a departure from the current
policy. He noted that he was directed to put the plaque in place. He pointed out that
there was no money donated; however, there is a plaque on stone at Centennial Lakes that
says "In Memoriam, Dwayne Lindberg, Member of the Bike Edina Task Force 2006-
2010." He stated that in this case, the City Manager directed him to purchase and install
the plaque as requested by a City Council member. Mr. Keprios pointed out it's not an
ordinance it's a policy so another policy would not have helped in that case. He stated
that the policy that's in place now does detract from what would otherwise be filling the
2
parks with plaques because to the donor the plaque is more important than the park
amenity.
Ms. Segreto asked what if something was done besides a plaque. What if they did a brick
in place of a plaque at Arneson Acres, that way you wouldn't be turning away donations.
Mr. Keprios stated that gift bricks are a good fundraising method for larger projects like
the gazebo at Arneson Acres Park. We have not used that method for ongoing donations.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that what the current policy has eliminated is donating a tree that
costs approximately $100.00 but the donor wants to place a $200.00 plaque at the base of
the tree. If a mower hits it the city is responsible to replace it. That is what they've been
able to avoid with the current policy.
Mr. Fronek asked if they could put a policy in place with regards to a material change in
the park that when a donation is made there are conditions and certain steps that need to
be followed.
Mr. Meyer asked if something is changing in the park and the improvements need
maintaining, does the city allow for those costs as part of the process. Mr. Keprios
replied that with the Nunn Memorial had it been requested to have a grass infield at the
very start he would have rejected it and they would have been done with the issue. Mr.
Meyer asked if there is a policy that they could put in place so that not only are they
requiring the cost of the impact but also the maintenance over a period of years. Ms.
Segreto stated that she doesn't think anyone will want to get hooked with that. Mr.
Meyer replied probably not, but that they could structure it in such a way that they say the
cost of implementation is X and with the special trimming that,will need to be done in the
next five years the total number is 2X, would you like it or not. Mr. Keprios indicated
that he has talked to the Park Foreman and City Forester and they have decided to
increase the charge of donated trees so that it will cover the cost of future maintenance as
well as administrative and forester time.
Mr. Lough asked what the recognition is for donating a tree to which Mr. Keprios replied
that in the past they would put a plaque in concrete next to every tree that was donated,
however the current policy has eliminated that. Mr. Lough asked when the tree dies if the
plaque goes too. Mr. Keprios replied the way he has been handling it is when a tree dies
that has been donated and has a plaque he contacts the family and asks if they want to
donate money for a new tree and continue on. If they choose not to then he gives the
family the plaque.
Mr. Meyer asked if they are going to a standard plaque or is it always specific per project.
Mr. Keprios replied it's been specific per project. Mr. Meyer asked would it help to have
something standard for e.g., an 8 x 8 inch brick with "In Memory Of' and up to 20 digits.
However, if you're donating $50,000 or more you may be able to pick out something
different. He noted that if people are picking out something every time they make a
donation that takes a tremendous amount of staff's time. Mr. Meyer suggested saying
there are 100 spots available to place a tree, they are $1,000 each and we are going to put
3
a 10 x 10 paver in the ground. Pick the one you want and it will be installed within the
next six months.
Ms. Steel stated that if recognition really is the key to getting donations maybe they need
to be more creative in giving that recognition and it would be different for every park.
She noted that she thinks they need to be a little more creative than just putting a plaque
next to every tree. They need to help people think about different ways of donating to the
parks.
Mr. Peterson asked Mr. Keprios what happened when they closed the "Brian
Wippermann Gun Range ". Mr. Keprios replied that when the new training facility was
built they named the training room the " Wippermann Training Room" and the plaque is
still there.
Mr. Peterson asked what the situation is with the couple that left over $300,000 to
Braemar Golf Course. Mr. Keprios replied it's in the Braemar Memorial Fund. Mr.
Meyer asked where is the Braemar Memorial Fund to which Mr. Keprios explained that it
is held by the City of Edina under an agreement approved by the City Council. It is in the
City coffers and it's in a specific fund that's a dedicated fund which the City Council
voted on and approved. The language is very specific that it cannot be used to pay off
debt or used for operating fund things. It needs to be used for things that the golf course
could otherwise not afford to do.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that regarding plaques they are in all shapes and
sizes throughout the park system. He noted that, if the Park Board wants, he could try to
come up with something that says on certain donations the size of the plaque would need
to be limited to 8 x 10, etc.
Ms. Segreto asked Mr. Keprios if a standard donor contract would make his life easier.
She noted that they would address everything that's problematic in the contract.
Mr. Meyer indicated wouldn't they be doing themselves a favor if they said here is our
ten year vision for each of these parks and these are the things we are going to do. You
are welcome to do one of these things. If you would like to do something outside of this
you will need to jump through some more hoops. Mr. Keprios commented that they have
their capital plan but that they are really large dollar items and thinks that, if the Park
Board wants, he could work on a wish list of smaller more affordable items for donors to
choose from.
Mr. Meyer indicated that he still likes the idea of donating trees at $1,000 each. He noted
doing this would be more of a process versus going around taking pictures, etc. and spend
countless hours with these requests.
Mr. Lough asked of the handful of donations that have met the requirements for a plaque
in the past two years how many would have not gotten it if there was no plaque. Mr.
Keprios replied he does not know the answer to that off the top of his head. Mr. Lough
asked, "What is the City's obligation to the citizens of the community in recognizing
4
fellow citizens in memorials through plaques in the park ?" Mr. Keprios responded that is
for the Park Board to decide. Mr. Lough stated it's a two sided question, what if they
were to raise the amount to $50,000 before they can get a plaque and everything else goes
into the general fund or Park and:Recreation Fund.
Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if a contract had been there would it have avoided a lot of
issues and maybe the contract thing is a starting point for them. Mr. Keprios replied
that's a wonderful idea.
Mr. Fronek commented that just to streamline'the process maybe they should unload
some of the work on the Edina Foundation because that's what it's there for. Mr. Fronek
indicated that if all of the donations could be funneled through the Edina Community
Foundation it may be a better way to deal. with them.
Ms. Segreto stated that there was reference in the Edina Policy about a large plaque
displaying the names of all large donors that was never erected. She asked if this is
something they should.do now. Mr. Keprios explained that at the,time of the policy they
were going through the anguish of what to do with the old building. Should they
renovate it or tear it down and therefore was directed to not do a large plaque at that time.
He noted that when they first moved into the new city hall everyone was directed to not
hang anything on the walls so nothing has been done. Mr. Keprios informed the Park
Board that his advice at this point would be to drop the whole language about the
recognition board. Ms. Segreto commented that if it was standardized and the names
were up for five or ten years maybe that would satisfy a donor. Mr. Keprios pointed out
that all donors are listed yearly on the city website and quarterly in the About Town as
well as they are given letters and are recognized at every City Council meeting so there is
public recognition, it's just not on a permanent plaque.
Ms. Steel indicated that she thinks there is a sentimental connection with the
neighborhood parks and donations that are made. Therefore she doesn't know if a central
city location would really meet the wants of all the people donating.
Mr. MacHolda indicated that maybe there is a section of the city's website welcoming
donors. He suggested someone from communications explore where places like the
Guthrie for e.g. are going out and getting these donations as well as find out how they
give recognition.
Mr. Lough stated that one of the nice points of this discussion is that it's really-trying to
do something for Edina and contributing money for Edina and less so about the memorial
and remembrance part of it. Looking at doing something for the city but not invest a lot
in plaques.
Ms. Steel asked the Park Board to keep in mind there is a task force that is currently
looking at considering a .Veterans. Memorial.. Therefore she doesn't want them to come
up with a policy that is iri contradiction with what they are doing. Mr. Keprios indicated
that there is a big difference between honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice for
your country versus grieving a lost loved one. Ms. Steel commented that she still thinks
they need to think about if there is any future donations to that or recognitions having to
do with the memorial as well as what specific things can be replaced during its lifespan.
Mr. Keprios stated that he is still not clear on how the Park Board feels about the
elimination of the permanent plaque that is currently in the language of the policy. He
asked the Park Board how they would feel if he took a shot at tweaking the current policy
to include a contract as well as put something in there about a minimum donation for
specific items. He noted that as staff they will work toward a wish list so that people can
make it simple rather than going case by case. He asked as far as recognition with
plaques, "Should it be left at a $5,000 threshold ?" Mr. Meyer replied to maybe raise it a
little bit but he would like to see something really, really simple that is pre -done and
straightforward.
Mr. Fronek indicated that he definitely thinks there needs to be a threshold, whether it's
an automated thing where if you donate X amount you get this. However, if the donation
is $50,000 or more then there can perhaps be a little bit more back and forth. He noted
that would be valuable staff time for those larger donations. Mr. Meyer commented that
regarding plaques he still doesn't think they should be doing custom plaques. He noted
that maybe if the donation is $20,000 and up then you get an 8 x 10 plaque, if it's less
than $20,000 it's a 3 x 5 plaque.
Ms. Steel indicated that in her vision a wish list would take care of all of this. It would
just be the cost, location of the item, what recognition if any would be on it and the
lifespan. The donor would know everything up front when they are shopping for an item.
Mr. Keprios explained that as an example when the neighbors of Fox Meadow came
forward wanting to develop the area into a park. They were able to raise a lot of money
and get it done but they also wanted their names on a plaque, which ended up being a
good size plaque. He noted that he could see this same thing happening at Van
Valkenburg Park where the neighborhood wants to see the park developed and finished.
What should that_ standard be? Ms. Steel replied that personally she thinks that things
outside of the wish list should come to the Park Board to be fully vetted to have a good
discussion so that everyone knows what is going on and has gotten their ideas across.
Mr. Meyer asked how much funding is required to do what they want to do. Mr. Keprios
replied approximately $300,000 to $400,000 for what they plan to do. He commented if
they get motivated to raise money and do the whole thing, what do you do for those who
donated? Mr. Fronek replied that's why they would have the threshold, if it's above
$50,000 then the Park Director, Park Board and City Council should have a certain
amount of leeway to figure out some sort of plaque or memorial that would be
appropriate for a gift of that size.
Mr. Meyer asked how many people would be donating, 3 or 50 to which Mr. Keprios
replied 50. Mr. Meyer noted that he would have the plaque that says "Renovated by the
neighbors of the park, 2010 ". He commented that he thinks they need to keep it simple.
Ms. Segreto stated that she thinks they need to be able to make an exception when they
want.
6
Mr. Lough indicated that for part of the policy he thinks they ought to consider the idea
that they would like to increase participation among all of the citizens of Edina and
encourage people to give something. He noted that he thinks they need to start a list and
publish the list of people who give to the City and give a lot of hoopla to that list. He
stated that you want to build that habit at a low level, $50, $100, etc. and then someday
someone is going to turn around and give $5,000, $10,000 or $300,000 because they were
reminded each year how much they appreciate the city and what has done for them and
their families. He would like for people to start to consider building a habit of giving and
getting recognition through their name on a list. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they
already have a great program that does that. He stated that he knows there will still be
people who will want something meaningful to them and their loved ones at a specific
park that is not on the list. He asked how he should handle those requests. Mr. Meyer
suggested he tell those people that he Park Board requires the Park Director to work only
on equipment/materials that are part of their ten year vision for each park unless the gift
is over $100,000. He stated that they need to have a framework that Mr. Keprios can
operate with.
Mr. Peterson commented that he doesn't see the reason why someone cannot have a
plaque if they've donated a water fountain, bench, etc. Mr. Fronek indicated that if it
meets a certain dollar amount they can. He added there are a thousand different ways for
people to be memorialized, it doesn't necessarily need to be in a park or on city land.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they will get special requests like the one Park
Board just approved for Willard Ikola at Braemar Arena. He noted those types of things
he will continue to bring to the Park Board to rule on.
II. NAMING PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the naming of parks and facilities has always
been the City Council's call on a case by case basis, there is no written policy. He asked
if this might be a discussion to have in a work session with the City Council. Mr.
Keprios stated that naming things is strictly politics and. something that as a matter of
practice staff stays away from.
Mr. Meyer suggested that if it is brought up at a public hearing to name something after
someone for the first time that the actual approval cannot take place for at least six
months. This way something doesn't just show up on a building. There should be a
separation timeline between when somebody is leaving or retiring versus when it can
happen. Ms. Segreto asked why would the City Council approve that, why would they
want to have their hands tied. Mr. Meyer replied because he thinks it's in their best
interest so that it is not done out of emotion.
Mr. Hulbert noted that he read some cities are no longer going to change the name of
parks. However, facilities are still on the table for discussion. He noted that he does like
the idea of having a timeline before naming of something can be approved.
7
Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks the difficult thing for future Park Boards and City
Councils is that it's difficult to change the name of a real estate that's been named after
someone. It's a little different when it's a building because buildings have a life
expectancy and eventually have to be rebuilt and then it's an appropriate time to rename
it. At what time does it feel okay to rename a park?
Mr. Peterson indicated that since Braemar Golf Course Manager John Valliere is retiring
after 40 plus years of service he would like everyone to think about renaming the nine-
hole golf course to the "Valliere Golf Course." He pointed out that Mr. Valliere has done
so much good with Braemar Golf course and especially with the Sister Kenney Golf
program. He noted that it wouldn't cost much to redo a plaque above the little pro shop
and someday when they are out of scorecards reprint them to say "John Valliere
Executive Course."
Dan Peterson MOVED THAT MOTION. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr. Fronek indicated that he thinks these are exactly the types of situations that a policy
should be written for. Mr. Hulbert commented that he thinks one of the reasons they are
talking about this is to kind of slow it down a bit. Mr. Meyer stated it comes back to his
window of reality where they should wait`six months. At that time after everyone has
thought about it and talked about a half dozen other options, then decide what it is they
would like to do for Mr. Valliere and what really makes sense.
Todd Fronek MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE MR. VALLIERE'S SERVICE TO THE
CITY OF EDINA AND AS APPROPRIATE AND CONSIDER OPTIONS FOR
EITHER NAMING A FACILITY OR PROVIDING SOME SORT OF RECOGNITION.
FOR THE SERVICE THAT HE HAS GIVEN.
Dan Peterson SECONDED TODD'S MOTION AND WITHDREW HIS ORIGINAL
MOTION.
In Favor — 5 — Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel
Against — 1— Louise Segreto
Abstained — 1 — Bill Lough
Mr. Lough noted that since he is not completely familiar with the extent of Mr.Valliere's
service to the city, therefore before voting for such a motion he would like to see a brief
write up as to what it is and why they are voting and therefore has abstained.
Keeya Steel MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO WAIT TO
APPROVE THE NAMING OF FACILITIES AND PARKS FOR SIX MONTHS
AFTER THE DEPARTURE OF CITY STAFF OR THE PASSING AWAY OF A
RESIDENT.
Mr. Meyer asked Ms. Steel if this is a motion that she would like to see pass now or is it
part of a policy they are thinking about incorporating. Mr. Lough stated that for purposes
8
of a working session he would be willing to pass something that says my sense of the
group is we are trying to slow this thing down and extend the period.
Ms. Steel noted that her hesitation is sending that recommendation forward and not
having any accompanying policy. Mr. Meyer pointed out that since Ms. Steel voted yes
for the recommendation she can bring this up again because she wants to change her vote
and see if it fails the second time around.
Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks they are talking about two separate issues. He thinks
one is recognition on behalf of the Park Board for Mr. Valliere's service.- Secondly does
the Park Board want to recommend a particular policy to the City Council in terms of
naming parks and/or facilities? Mr. Fronek stated it might be helpful to implement a, six
month cooling off period.
Mr. Peterson stated that he can see why the City Council would want to commemorate
Gordon Hughes right away and name the pavilion at Centennial Lakes after him. He did
an incredible job for the city as has Mr. Valliere. He doesn't see a need for a cooling off
period. He sees a cooling off period for the death of a loved one who may want
something out of the ordinary but can't quite get the $5,000 or $10;000. Maybe the
grieving process will change their mind during those six months.' Ms. Steel pointed out
to her it actually seems like increasing the importance of the service of that person
because by waiting six months'and then having a ceremony and really recognizing the
person.
Ms. Segreto noted that she has a procedural issue question as to whether Ms. Steel can
amend the motion that was passed. Mr. Meyer noted that she supported the motion and
she is choosing to switch her vote so she can call up the motion again and see if there is
support to vote it down.
Mr. Hulbert stated that he thinks the City Council wants to have the flexibility when it
comes to naming. of parks or facilities. Mr. Lough asked if the Park Board would
typically look at naming a park or facility before it goes to the City Council for a vote or
does it bypass the Park Board altogether. Mr. Peterson replied they are just.an advisory
Board and if the City Council wants the Park Board's advice they will ask for it.
Ms. Steel indicated that she thinks the discussions are going to take place regarding
peoples' retirements or passing away no matter what. She stated that giving people time
to really discuss which parks or facilities have meaning to this particular person have
everyone included and take.a little time to think it through. She commented that she is
fully confident in the City Council's decision to pick the appropriate place, she is' just
asking for a little more time and not streamline it as soon as someone retires.
Mr. Meyer indicated that maybe it's not appropriate tonight but at the next formal Park
Board meeting recommend that they wait a:minimum of six months from the person's
separation of employment or duty from the city before any naming rights are considered.
9
Ms. Steel stated that she approved the recommendation because she does believe Mr.
Valliere should be recognized and should be considered for having. something named
after him.`. However, at the same time she also believes that there needs to be some
waiting time to fully think it through and get other people's input. Mr. Hulbert added that
they may even find a better idea.
1VIr. Hulbert commented that when he initially saw that the promenade bike path was
going to be named after Dwayne Lindberg he thought that was a pretty big gesture. He
noted that in. that case it may have been a good thing to. wait the six months before doing.
anything,
Mr. Hulbert asked if this could be put on the agenda for the next Park Board meeting.
Mr. Keprios replied that what he hears the Park Board saying is that they prefer a waiting
period and therefore the language that he will put together will be from the comments he
has heard that the waiting period would begin the day that a suggestion. is made
regardless who the person is. Also, formal action wouldn't be taken for six months after
'the day that it is proposed and the departure.
Mr. Meyer indicated that inaddition to the six month'waiting period so that it isn't an
emotional response but what about the costs and long term implications. He gave the
example what if they wanted to put up a 12 x 24 bronze plaque and.it's coming out of the
city fund what are the financial, implications of that. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Meyer if he.
is suggesting that the dollars should come from another source. Mr. Meyer replied
possibly but more so he thinks in understanding of what the long -term cost implications
are in terms of either city manpower or recognitions. Mr. Keprios replied that typically
in naming of things there really are not a lot of costs.
Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board to think about a couple of things between now and
their next meeting. In addition to a waiting period give some thought to whether the
.policy should state that the person should be deceased before naming a park or facility
after them. Also "give some thought to perpetuity once you name something, does" it
always have to be that name or do you want:to .put a.:sunset on it. He indicate&that these
Are just some ideas he has. heard kicked around in other naming policies.
Mr. Meyer indicated that he thinks what Mr. Keprios is struggling with is sometimes
when they name something down the, road nobody, remembers who they are and is it a
value., He suggested that maybe the language is something along the lines of we are
naming this park for a minimum of 50 years and after that it can be changed.
°Mr. Keprios indicated just so he understands what the Park Board would like him to work
on the naming of facilities: He asked if they would like him:to come up with something
to look at for the September :meeting. Mr. Peterson and Mr. Hulbert both replied yes.
Ms. Segreto replied she is not expecting anything, she doesn't think they should get into
it: Mr. Hulbert asked- Mr. Keprios to tell them what he comes up with and they can talk
about it at their next meeting. Mr. Keprios replied that he is happy to work on whatever
the Park Board would like him to do as staff. He just wants to make sure he is doing
what it is they are requesting of him.
10
Ms. Steel noted that she thinks it might be valuable to meet in a work session setting
again. She suggested meeting an hour before the next Park Board meeting. Mr. Hulbert
asked Mr. Keprios if that gives him enough time to work through the memorial donation
ideas. He replied that may not have it completely ready but that the wish list will be:
ready.. Mr. Hulbert asked about having another work session after the next Park Board
meeting to which Mr. Keprios replied`;that would help a lot. Mr. Hulbert also suggested
that they try to have another work session so that they are not trying to cram everything
into an hour.
III. PARK BOARD COMMENT
A. Three Rivers Park - Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if there is any chance the Park
Board could meet with someone from Three Rivers Park to give them all.the up -to-
date information. He indicated that he knows currently there are a couple of different
plans and routes. He noted that he thought it would be'helpful to understand what.
they are currently proposing before the joint meeting that is currently scheduled for
September 29`h. He commented they could do it in another work session type setting.
Ms. Steel asked if there are documents available that speak about the issues that
would be helpful and asked if they could be sent out electronically.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that as of today there are three options that will be presented
at the joint work session. He noted that it is now staff's mission to come up with the
pros and cons of each option. He indicated that'he will see if Kelly Grissman from
Three Rivers Park District can meet with the Park Board one hour before their
September 14th Park Board meeting to bring the Park Board up -to -date on
everything.
Mr. Peterson asked what role the Park Board plays regarding the bike path. Mr.
Keprios replied that he thinks they are just asking for the Park Board to voice their
own views on this. They are not looking for any specific recommendations from the
Park Board yet at this time.
MEETING ADJOURNED
11
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the
Heritage Preservation Board
Monday, August 9, 2010, 7:00 PM
Edina Community Room
4801 50th Street West
Chair Joel Stegner, Chris Rofidal, Ross Davis, Bob Schwartzbauer,
Arlene Forrest and Elizabeth Montgomery
Jean Rehkamp Larson, Claudia Carr, and Colleen Curran
Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 11, 2010
Member Davis moved approval of the minutes from the May 11, 2010 meeting. Member
Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificate of Appropriateness
A. H -10 -03 4623 Bruce Avenue - New Detached Garage
Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4600 bIO&
of Bruce Avenue. The existing home was constructed in 1927 and currently has a 3 -car
detached garage accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property.
Ms. Repya pointed out that the home has the original 1927 footprint of 835 square feet while the
detached garage is almost as large at 794 square feet. It is the homeowner's desire to increase
the livability of their home by adding a 666.5 square foot addition to the rear. In order to comply
with maximum 30% lot coverage requirement, the large detached garage will be removed to be
replaced by the proposed 484 square foot structure moved to the northeast corner of the yard
which will also provide a more livable back yard space.
The plans propose to demolish the existing 3 -stall garage in the southeast corner of the rear
yard and building a new, 484 square foot detached 2 -stall garage in the northeast corner. The
plan illustrates the new structure will maintain appropriate setbacks, and will be compatible in
size, scale, and texture with the historic Tudor Revival style house and with other historic homes
in the district. Attention to detail is provided on the south, east and west elevations. The
undecorated north wall is partially screened by the fence that runs along the south property line.
The clipped or "jerkin head" gable proposed for the east and west elevations nicely matches the
shape of the roof on the house and the garage door and lanterns are appropriate for the
property. A new curb cut will not be required since the proposed garage will be accessed by the
existing driveway.
While not subject to COA review, the homeowner provided the plans for the addition to the rear
of the home for the board's information.
Minutes
Heritage Preservation Board
August 9, 2010
Ms. Repya added that Consultant Vogel has reviewed the plans, and he along with Staff
recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new detached garage. She
pointed out that the plans are not unlike those previously reviewed for homes in the Country
Club District, and will enhance both the subject property as well as the neighborhood at large.
Furthermore, the proposed plans clearly demonstrate the homeowner's desire to provide for a
more livable home both on the interior as well as in the rear yard.
The recommendation for approval is subject to the following conditions:
• The plans presented.
• The condition that a year built (2010) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached
garage as well as the addition to the home.
Findings supporting the approval recommendation include:
• The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the
project.
• The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment.
Member Schwartzbauer stated that while he understands that under the current procedures for
Certificates of Appropriateness in the Country Club District the addition to the home is not
subject to review, he wanted to go on record expressing his opinion that he feels strongly that
additions to homes in the district should undergo the same COA review as the new garages.
Following a brief discussion, Chairman Stegner agreed that Member Schwartzbauer brought up
a point of interest to several members of the board and suggested that the topic of amending
the procedures for a COA to include additions visible from the public right -of -way be included on
the September meeting agenda.
Member Rofidal raised the following questions:
1. No architectural detailing is provided on the north wall of the garage because it is
abutting a privacy fence. What if the fence is removed?
Lon Oberpriller, from Replacement Homes representing the owners explained that the fence
belongs to the abutting property owner, and if they chose to remove the fence, and did not like
the blank wall of the proposed garage, they could replace the fence.
2. Since the owners of the home have recently purchased the property, how did
they know that a Certificate of Appropriateness would be required for their
project?
Planner Repya explained that she and Mr. Fu had several conversations as his family was
contemplating purchasing the property. He was encouraged to research the updated Country
Club District information on the City's website which provided detailed information on the COA
requirements and procedures.
Lon Oberpriller from Replacement Housing Services Consortium, representing the new owners
explained that he is aware of the COA procedures, and he too provided guidance for Mr. Fu and
Ms. Ge as they were planning the project. Mr. Oberpriller added that this project was designed
to enhance the livability of the home, maintain the property's historic integrity, and compliment
the entire neighborhood.
Fa
Minutes
Heritage Preservation Board
August 9, 2010
Following a brief discussion, Member Rofidal moved approval of the Certificate of
Appropriateness for the new detached garage at 4623 Bruce Avenue subject to the plans
presented and a year built plaque be placed on the garage. Member Davis seconded the
motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
III. NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY WALKING TOURS:
Chairman Stegner observed that the Board's walking tour of the Morningside neighborhood
during the July meeting was a wonderful opportunity for the HPB to get out from the meeting
room and see first -hand the neighborhood currently under study. He added that such a tour
would no doubt be of great interest to the community, and something that should be included in
future work plans.
Member Davis reminded the Board that he volunteered to research city tours that are currently
in the planning files, and in doing so, discovered several city -wide tours as well as a tour of the
west side of the Country Club District. Mr. Davis provided board members with copies of the
tours, pointing out that they needed to be updated, but provided a good framework from which
future tours could be created.
Mr. Davis also pointed out that he knows a gentleman who does professional voice - overs, and
he may be willing to record some of the copy for the tours at no cost. Member Rofidal added
that perhaps the City's Communications and Marketing department could assist in producing the
tours. The Board agreed these were all good ideas.
A general discussion of city tours ensued. It was mentioned that an historic bike tour might be
well received due to the current activities of the "Bike Edina" taskforce. Member Forrest
observed that providing walking and /or biking tours would fit in well with the city's initiatives
promoting healthy lifestyles — a great green project.
Planner Repya pointed out that the Edina Historical Society has been working on creating an
historic driving tour of the city. She suggested that perhaps the Historical Society and the HPB
could work together since the tours would include information on important historic resources
(the HPB's charge) as well as the history of Edina residents (the Historical Society's charge).
Ms. Repya offered to contact the Historical Society regarding the status of their tour project and
report back to the HPB.
IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None
V. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE: September 16 -17 in Winona
Planner Repya reminded the Board that the 2010 Minnesota Preservation Conference is
scheduled for September 16 & 17 in the City of Winona. Because Edina is a Certified Local
Government, attendance at the annual conference by at least one board member is mandatory.
In the past, board members have attended the Friday session of the conference; however the
State Historical Society is providing a matching grant to cover the registration fee and mileage
for those attending on both Thursday and Friday. The city's match can include the time spent
by board members at the conference, thus there may not be a cash match required.
Ms. Repya pointed out that Friday, August 13th is the registration deadline for early registration.
She asked Board members to check their calendars and report to her by August 13th if they
would be able to attend. Ms. Repya also encouraged those interested to consider car - pooling to
Minutes
Heritage Preservation Board
August 9, 2010
Winona, and offered to assist organizing the drive.
A brief discussion ensued. Ms. Repya offered to send an email reminder from which the Board
could respond. No formal action was taken.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS:
1. 4602 Bruce Avenue — House tour
Member Rofidal reported that he attended a neighborhood open house for the newly
constructed Country Club District home which received a Certificate of Appropriateness from the
HPB in 2009. He observed that when one compares 4602 with the home at 4608 Bruce Avenue
approved through a COA in 2006, the revised COA procedures have really paid off — the newest
4602 home fits in well with the district, whereas 4608 appears taller and less in keeping with its
surroundings. He added that the new home is evidence that the influence of the HPB can make
a difference in the district for the better.
Member Rofidal then suggested that Andy Porter, the builder of 4602 Bruce Ave. be invited to a
future meeting of the HPB to share photos of the completed home, as well as input he could
provide regarding the COA process. Board members agreed that would be a good idea.
2. COA Procedures — Reviewing what is visible from the street
Board members continued the discussion from earlier in the meeting regarding the desire to
reevaluate the possibility of requiring a Country Club District COA review of not only changes to
a street facing fagade, but any change visible from the street; which would then include changes
to the sides of the homes. Member Rofidal opined that side walls have been important when
reviewing new homes, and he welcomed a broader discussion on the topic.
Member Forrest agreed, pointing out that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards address what
is visible when standing in front of the house.
Member Schwartzbauer offered to draft possible language that would address the review of
changes to what is visible from the street, rather than only to changes on street facing facades.
Board members agreed that they looked forward to a discussion on this. matter at the September
meeting.
3. Signs Identifying Cahill School & Grange Hall — In disrepair
Chairman Stegner observed that the informational signs on the exterior of the Cahill School and
Grange Hall are quite weather beaten, and in need of upgrading. Planner Repya explained that
the signs were installed by the Edina Historical Society. She offered to convey Mr. Stegner's
observations, see if there are plans for making improvements to the signs, and report back to
the board.
4. Student HPB Members - Farewell & Welcome
Planner Repya recognized student member Elizabeth Montgomery who after serving the HPB
for two years, was attending her last meeting. Ms. Montgomery stated that the thoroughly
enjoyed her time with the Board, and will stay informed through the HPB's new and improved
Minutes
Heritage Preservation Board
August 9, 2010
website. Elizabeth added that in September she will begin her freshman year at Concordia
College in Moorhead, MN. Board members offered their thanks for Elizabeth's many
contributions to the work of the HPB and wished her the very best in her future.
Planner Repya introduced Lauren Thorsen, a senior at Edina High School, and one of the two
new HPB student board members. Lauren was invited to observe the August meeting, and will
begin her one year term in September. Board members welcomed Lauren and expressed their
delight in working with her in the coming year.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE:
1. Donation of reference materials for HPB from Kuhl Design Build — "Get Your House
Right" by Marianne Cusato & Ben Penreath
Planner Repya explained that the HPB received a donation of 10 copies of the book "Get Your
House Right" for board members to use as a resource guide. The books were provided by Kuhl
Design Build, the company responsible for the work recognized in the 2010 Heritage Award at
4411 Arden Avenue. The Kuhl Design Build team expressed their appreciation for the work of
the HPB and offered the book as a tool to assist board members when undertaking design
review.
The board gratefully received the books, and agreed that when their terms expired, they would
return the book for use by future board members.
VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE: September 14, 2010
IX. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce Repya
Edina Public Art Committee - MINUTES - 8/05/10
Community Room, Edina City Hall 4pm
Present: Bernice Amacher, Rick Fesler, John Keprios, Amy Kerber, Linda Kieffer,
Bill McCabe, Lois Ring, Anne Spooner and Ruth Valgemae. Not present: Brad
Benn, Dick Crockett.
June 3, 2010 minutes amended and approved.
CONTINUING BUSINESS
Edina Promenade and Grandview Update
Next year's dedication ceremony should be reduced to 1.5 hrs which is a more
suitable time frame.
Lois Ring reported that 200 ballots have come in so far and reported that The
Plunge is currently in the lead. Ballots are located at Grandview, the Promenade
ballot boxes near 70th at the gateway paths, Edina Art Center and the Senior
Center.
Lois Ring received payment for the total purchase of Time Piece by Dean
Holzman from Dee Kennedy. She and Diana Hedges will proceed to get approval
from City Council for these two gifts including MN Eco Turtle donated by EPAC
Committee Members.
Lois Ring received a comment from an Edina resident suggesting having sand
underneath the MN Eco Turtle rather than grass and would look more natural.
John Keprios responded that the sand would need to be contained and he will
discuss this with Tom Shirley.
Marketing and Promotion
Linda Kieffer reported the Promenade Brochure has been reprinted and looks
very good. Compliments go to Kaylin Martin for her work on photography and
design of the new brochure.
Brochures are located at Grandview Square, Galleria, Edina Art Center, City Hall
desk and the Senior Center. Bernice Amacher will ask the library if ok to place
there also.
Edina Magazine's next issue in October will have a small article about EPAC.
Lois Ring is communicating with the writer and they want to feature one
sculpture. Hopefully they will feature a new up and coming sculptor in article.
Linda Kieffer expressed that this will benefit the artist.
Button sales are now at $395. Promotion thru EAC schedule continues.
Linda Kieffer reports that the EPAC website has been updated with new pictures
and information.
EAC approval of EAC /EPAC Responsibilities document
This has not been voted on yet. Bill McCabe will get it on the agenda.
Lois Ring moved that EPAC be EAC members. Motion carried.
Fund raising and Financial Update
Lois Ring and Bill McCabe attended the Ways and Means Committee meeting.
It was defined as a coordinating committee rather than an active committee and
meets bi- monthly.
Lois Ring moved that a card be printed that will promote donations and be
enclosed in the water bill at Diana Hedges suggestion with the EPAC information
on one side and the media studio information on the other. Motion approved.
No further information on a Dick Blick donation.
Lois Ring is assembling a marketing packet and is requesting input from Heather
Randall King on the letter.
Lind Kieffer and the committee reviewed changes made to EPAC's Polices and
Procedures document. See complete document at end of minutes below.
Linda Kieffer reported that Dick Crockett will no longer be attending meetings
since he is not a regular EPAC member.
Amy Kerber reported that she is in discussion with Tiffany & Co. to be a possible
donor. They question how a donation will help their business. Amy Kerber will
respond and continue the donation request.
NEW BUSINESS
Ruth Valgemae reported that, while the proposal for a commemorative sculpture
of Kodiak, the police dog, has not yet been presented to the entire Crime Fund
Board, Ken Rosland and Treasurer Denny Maetzold have expressed interest in
pursuing the project. The Crime Fund would like further information on the costs
involved, and would like to see the statue in a publicly accessible space. John
Keprios commented that Braemar would be a logical location since it is near the
dog cemetery and also accessible for children. Ruth Valgemae will follow up
about artists. EPAC will only be able to assist with selection as no funds are
available.
EAC /EPAC is planning a° °joint fund raiser with Edina Fairview Auxillary Nov.4 at
EAC. There will be a silent auction, artist demos with many items for sale,
appetizers, wine and music -A very festive event. Monies raised will be divided
between the three organizations.
Linda Kieffer asked John Keprios about the 10,000 request from the city:
John Keprios reported that Gordon Hughes declined to include the request for
$10,000 from the City for the- 2011 -12 sculpture exhibition and other operational
expenses. He further reported that it would be added in again to the budget
requests that will be discussed before the City Council.
In the June 2010 minutes it was stated that Dick Crockett would be notifying John
Keprios of the MN Eco Turt/e%donat'ion to the City. In the future, when EPAC
receives donations through Edina Community Foundation, the Foundation will
send the donation to Edina Art Center. The Art Center will then proceed, to get
approval from City Council as they do with all donations. Phil'Johnson will keep
records of all donations. It was also stated that the Marguerite McNally funds
were to be used for award money.
Lois Ring presented gifts to Linda Kieffer for her many years of service to EPAC
as this was her last meeting. Diana Hedges had taken beautiful photos of the Art
Glass Window in City Hall and the committee was thankful to present an
enlargement and several beautiful greeting cards that Diana Hedges had
designed.
Meeting adjourned at 5:25pm
Next meeting will be Sept. 2, 2010
Minutes submitted by Anne Spooner
EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES- revised 6/10
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Edina Public Art Committee is to promote -and enhance the aesthetic
quality of life in Edina through the enjoyment of art in the City's public spaces.
GOALS AND DUTIES OF THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE
I
-Serve in an advisory capacity to the City in all public art- related matters (all city-
sponsored pubic art projects shall require City Council approval).
- Oversee execution of City- approved projects
-Build awareness and -pride in community heritage and neighborhood identity.
-Serve as a vehicle, for public education in the visual arts.,
- Encourage cooperation among public and private sectors, city government, and the arts
community.
-Make recommendations for creative fund- raising mechanisms to fund public art
displays.
- Promote. economic development through the arts.
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
Art /Artwork --- -A visual, two or three dimensional creation including but not limited to
sculpture, painting, murals, mosaics, glass works, photography, ,and crafts in clay, fiber,
textiles, wood, metal; mixed media or any combination of forms of media.
Public Places - - -All privately or publicly owned spaces (indoors or outdoors) which are
accessible to the public.
Public Arty - Art in public places. Public art may possess functional as well as aesthetic
qualities and may include both permanent and temporary works.
COMPOSI•TION AND STRUCTURE OF THE EDINA PUBLIC ART
COMMITTEE
The Edina-Public Art Committee (EPAC) shall be a standing committee of the Edina Art
Center' Board. The Edina Art Center Board shall appoint the members of EPAC which
Will consist of a minimum of seven persons ideally including:
-at least one professional artist representative
-at least one Edina Community Foundation representative
-at least one member of the Edina Art Center Board
-at least one community member with an interest in the arts
-at least one staff liaison from the Edina Art Center (staff will not have voting privileges)
One person may fulfill more that one of these requirements.
When at all possible, the Chair of EPAC shall be a board member of the Edina Art Center
and act as liaison to the Art Center.
EPAC members shall receive no compensation for their services.
FUNDING PROCEDURES
The Edina Public Art, Committee shall receive private and corporate donations through
the Edina Community Foundation's Public Art Fund.
The City may periodically allocate funds as requested by EPAC and authorized by the
City Council.
The City shall collect donations via the quarterly utility bill which includes a provision
for adding one, five, or ten or more (as determined by the individual) dollars to the actual
dollar amount of the bill.
The Edina Art Center shall initiate and oversee one fund- raising activity per year which
benefits both the Art Center and the Edina Public Art Committee.
Other fund - raising methods may be considered and approved at any time.
SITE SELECTION FOR PUBLIC WORKS OF ART
The site may' be public or private property and should be situated in such a way that it is`
visible and accessible to the greatest possible number of members of the community.
The artwork should not unnecessarily disrupt the flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
Potential obstruction of growing trees /shrubs or future construction shall be taken into
account.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF ARTWORK
EPAC shall consider (but not be bound by any one of) the following guidelines in
choosing works to recommend to the City Council for approval:
-Does the artwork represent excellence in community design of public art?
-Is it appropriate for public display?
-Is it original, compelling, and creative work?
-Does the artwork represent workmanship of the highest quality?
-Does it raise awareness of community heritage or have historical value?
-Does the piece appeal to a broad range of people?
-Is the artwork true to the, original goals of the project?
-Does the piece relate to the unique identity of the City?
-Is the -piece safe for public interaction?
-What is the likely maintenance requirement?
-For outdoor work, is 'it durable under year- round weather conditions?
CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR ARTIST SELECTION
Artists chosen by EPAC shall'be active artists who are recognized in their field,either
locally, regionally, nationally, or internationally. The body of work, exhibits /shows,
awards, and sales history of artist candidates shall be considered.
Artists may be contacted by the following methods:
-Open Competition
"Open competition for public art projects will be advertised in the local media, arts
media, or local, regional, and national arts organizations.
- Limited Competition
Selected artists may be invited by EPAC to submit an RFQ (request for qualifications)
for the creation of public art pieces.
EPAC shall act as a jury and review and evaluate all submissions. (Additional members
of the jury panel may be appointed from the community at the discretion of the
committee). When appropriate, a limited number of finalists from the pool of
submissions shall be chosen to interview. EPAC's final selection will be submitted to the
City Council for approval.
CONTRACTING WITH ARTISTS
Upon completion of the art/artist selection process for a purchase, loan, or gift, the
Community Foundations shall enter into a contractual agreement with the artist. The
contract shall be signed by the artist before the work is installed. The contract may
contain the following stipulations:
-The art is original and does not infringe on any copyright.
-The execution and fabrication of the art will be performed in a professional and timely
manner.
-The material will be free of defects in material and craftsmanship.
-In the case of a loaned piece of art, the artist will be responsible for installing and
insuring the work.
-In the case of a purchased piece of art, the rights with respect to the work that the City
shall acquire (i.e. copyright etc.) shall be specified.
-A method and schedule of payment to the artist.
-Final payment will be made only after review and acceptance by the City.
- Conditions may warrant the removal or relocation of a piece (See "Deaccessions"
Below).
GIFTS, LOANS, AND COMMISSIONS/PURCHASES
Gifts, loans, and purchases of public art may be accepted by the City if deemed
appropriate by EPAC (see "Criteria for Selection of Artwork ") and approved by the City
Council. All gifted work shall become property of the City.
DEACCESSION
The deaccession of a piece of public art should be a deliberate and seldom -used
procedure. Works should not be disposed of simply because they are not currently in
fashion or because their worth is called in to question by a few individuals.
The following conditions are to be considered before any deaccession:
-The City Council determines that the site is needed for another public use.
-The work has deteriorated beyond a reasonable means of conservation.
-The authenticity of the piece has been determined to be false or fraudulent.
-The artwork possesses faults of design or fabrication that challenge its artistic merit.
In the event of deaccession:
-If appropriate, the artist shall be given the first option to purchase.
-If not purchased by the artist, the work may be sold through auction, gallery resale, or
direct bid by and individual or donated to another appropriate entity (i.e. museum, school
etc.)
- Proceeds from the sale are to be used for future public art projects.
-If none of the above options are viable, the work may have to be destroyed.
The recommendation to dispose of a work should be made by EPAC after careful review
(which may include the services of a professional conservator) and a majority vote of the
committee. Final approval for deaccession will be granted by the City Council.
MAINTENANCE
Permanent public works of art shall be maintained and preserved by the City in the best
possible condition via regular inspection and cleaning. Repair may be necessary when
the work needs to be returned to its original condition and integrity in the event of
neglect, aging, damage or vandalism.
PUBLIC EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Informing the public about a work of art is crucial to the success and public acceptance of
the piece. When at all possible, the community should participate in the public art
process.
The following activities may encourage the public's awareness and involvement:
- Presentations about the artwork to community groups, government agencies, citizen
committees, local businesses, and corporate service groups.
- Inclusion of community residents on the jury panel in the art/artist selection process.
-Site visits by citizen representatives.
- Community initiated neighborhood gateway projects.
- Extensive media coverage.
- School education programs which will incorporate visual and written.materials about
public art in general and the importance of the public artwork in our community.
Revised 6/10