Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-09-21_COUNCIL MEETING�5 * * AGENDA. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 21, 20.10 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items,unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it.' In such cases the item wilV. be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING°& REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. APPROVAL�OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of September 7, 2010 II. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -2 - Appointing Cell Smith, Interim Executive Director of Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 7, 2010 and Work Sessions of September 7, 2010 and September 13, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a'respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Amending Section 900 Edina Liquor Code * B. PUBLIC HEARING — New Intoxicating Liquor License — Pinstripes — Continued to October 5, 2010 Agenda /Edina City. Council September 21, 2010 Page 2 III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Installation of Hockey, Rink Lights and Poles —Pamela Park & Walnut Ridge Park * B. 70th Street Improvements, Contract, No. ENG 10 -3; Improvement Nos..BA -367, SS- 457, STS -369, WM -503, TS 43 & 44, and L57 IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote''of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Call For Sale of Bonds — Resolution No. 2010 -78 Providing For sale of $9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvements Plan Bonds, Series.2010A and Resolution No. 2010 -79 Providing For Sale of $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010B B Resolution No. 2010 -77 Accepting Various..Donations (Affirmative vote of four Council Members to approve) * C. Resolution No. 2010 -80 Designating City Manager on Interim Basis D. Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2010 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration, at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, ,Pre -List dated September 9, 2010, TOTAL $1,279,012.58; Pre -List dated September .16, 2010, TOTAL $419,491.72 and for Credit Card Transactions dated 7/27/10 — 8/25/10 TOTAL $8,781.44 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Agenda /Edina City Council September 21, 2010 Page 3 A. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS A. Interim City Manager IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sep 21 Work Session — Utility Budget & CIP Review 5:00 P.M. Tues Sep 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Sep 28 Study Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review 4:30 — 6:30 P.M. Wed Sep 29 Joint Work Session with Three Rivers Park Board 7:00 —10:00 P.M. Tues Oct 5 Work Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review Cont. 5:00 — 6:30 P.M. Tues Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 26 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. Mon Nov 1 Work Session — Final Levy Review & 20100 Gen Fund Budget 5:00 P.M. Mon Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 2 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Mon Nov 8 CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS 5:00 P.M. Thur Nov 11 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Nov 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 23 Study Session —to be determined 7:30 A.M. Thur Nov 25 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Dec 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM SOUTH VIEW MID SCHOOL COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 7:07 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council consent agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. EDINA POLICE RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation recognizing the Edina Police Department. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving a proclamation recognizing the Edina police department for writing 900 traffic tickets in July 2010. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Police Chief Long thanked the Council for this recognition and stated that the point was not the number of tickets issued but keeping residents safe. Bob O'Brien, liaison to Law Enforcement Department of Public Safety, commented on the importance of law enforcement and resulting increase in safety and stated his appreciation to the Police Department for its dedicated efforts. The Council concurred and thanked the officers in attendance. CONSTITUTION WEEK DECLARED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving a proclamation declaring September 17 to 23, 2010, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Dianna Lynch, 5936 Grove Street, thanked the Council for this recognition and its support of democracy. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 2010, AND WORK SESSIONS OF AUGUST 17, 2010, AUGUST 30, 2010, AND AUGUST 31, 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the regular meeting of August 17, 2010, and work sessions of August 17, 2010, August 30, 2010, and August 31, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON PRELIMINARY 2011 TAX LEVY AND OPERATING BUDGET — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -72 ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Finance Director Wallin presented the draft resolution that established a 2011 preliminary levy of $26,088,328. He advised the levy would be certified to the County and the County would send property specific tax notices to property owners. A public hearing was scheduled for December 7, 2010. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7. 2010 Public Testimony Bob Kojetin, 5016 William Avenue, representing the Edina Historical Society, addressed the Council and requested additional support. Dan Kelley, 88 Woodland Circle, representing the Edina Historical Society, addressed the Council and advised of their budgetary needs. Arnie Bigbee, 7621 Edinborough Way, Human Rights & Relations Commission Chair, addressed the Council and presented their request for the same level of funding in 2011. Bill McCabe, 6124 Hanson Road, representing the Edina Public Art Committee, addressed the Council and reviewed their activities. The Council discussed the services rendered by the Edina Historical Society and Human Rights & Relations Commission for the City's residents. The Council requested the Edina Public Art Committee submit a formal budgetary request and supporting analysis. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -72, adopting the proposed budget for the City of Edina for year 2011, and establishing the proposed tax levy payable in 2011. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — AERIAL BUCKET TRUCK — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for aerial bucket truck, Edina Park Maintenance department to the recommended low bidder, I -State Trucker Center at $63,019.17. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — TWO ONE -TON TRUCKS FOR PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for two one -ton trucks for public works to the recommended low bidder, Midway Ford Commercial Fleet and Government Sales at $70,162.76. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — TRUCK BODY FOR ONE -TON TRUCK FOR STREET DEPARTMENT IN PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for truck body for one -ton truck for street department in public works to the recommended low bidder, Aspen Equipment at $32,289.08. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — TRUCK BODY FOR ONE -TON TRUCK FOR ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT IN PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for truck body for one -ton truck for electrical department in public works to the recommended low bidder, ABM Equipment & Supply at $28,005.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — AERIAL BUCKET ASSEMBLY FOR ONE -TON TRUCK FOR ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT IN PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for aerial bucket assembly for one -ton truck for Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7. 2010 electrical department in public works to the recommended low bidder, ABM Equipment & Supply at $39,262.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — WEST 50TH STREET PLANTER LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION — PROJECT NO. ENG 10 -14 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for West 50th Street Planter Landscape and Irrigation, Project No. ENG 10 -14, to the recommended low bidder, Hoffman & McNamara Company at $25,783.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *2011 BUDGET AND LEVY PUBLIC HEARING AND BUDGET AND LEVY ADOPTION MEETING SET Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson, to set Tuesday, December 7, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. for the budget and levy meeting public hearing and Tuesday, December 21, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. for the budget and levy adoption meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. DRAFT LIQUOR CODE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEWED AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET — SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 Interim Manager Worthington presented the draft liquor ordinance amendment to allow more charitable organizations to apply for a temporary intoxicating on -sale liquor license. Clerk Mangen and Attorney Knutson answered questions of the Council regarding the amendment language, need for reasonable controls to assure best practices, and providing adequate security. Assistant to the City Manager Smith advised of training provided to City staff to assure liquor sale compliance. The Council discussed additional requirements such as identifying the event manager, issuing wrist bands to non - minors, liquor compliance training, offering food for consumption, servers not being allowed to drink while serving alcoholic beverages at the event, no price discounting, identification of service hours, not serving to intoxicated patrons, and security by licensed off -duty police officers at a level dependent upon attendance. It was indicated that staff would create a user - friendly educational document for applicants. Ms. Worthington stated staff would make the discussed revisions prior to consideration of first reading. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, directing staff to schedule a public hearing on September 21, 2010, to consider Ordinance No. 2010 -13, amending the Edina city code concerning liquor, as revised. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR LOCAL ROADWAYS REVISED AND ADOPTED Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle presented rationale for each of the proposed revisions to the special assessment policy for local roadways as directed by the Council at its August 17, 2010, workshop. The Council discussed the revisions and asked questions of Mr. Houle and Mr. Wallin. The Council suggested additional clarification regarding how the interest rate for the assessment was computed and to draft more recent rationale for item 5 pages 2 -3. The following corrections were requested: page 2, item 4, remove the word "then" in four instances; and, page 3, item 7b, insert the word "be" after the word "shall." Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to adopt the special assessment policy for local roadways, as revised. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. BRAEMAR ROOM RENAMED TO JOHN VALLIERE ROOM Mayor Hovland advised of the support to rename the "Braemar Room" at Braemar Golf Course the "John Valliere Room" in honor of retired Braemar Golf Course Manager Valliere who had retired after 41 years. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving renaming the "Braemar Room" at Braemar Golf Course the "John Valliere Room" in honor of retired Braemar Golf Course Manager John Valliere. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7. 2010 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *DATE FOR CANVASS OF GENERAL ELECTION SET — NOVEMBER 8. 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson setting the date of Monday, November 8, 2010, at 5:00 p.m. to canvass the results of the November 2, 2010, General Election. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -74 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS AND CITY'S READINESS GRANT EXTENSION Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -74, authorizing the City of Edina to amend the public health preparedness and City's readiness initiative grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -75 ADOPTED — PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND UTILITY CERTIFICATION SET — OCTOBER 5. 2010 AND OCTOBER 19, 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -75, calling public hearings for consideration of certain special assessments and delinquent utilities for October 5, 2010, and October 19, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -73 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -73 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 LIQUOR LICENSE ISSUED — PEOPLE'S ORGANIC FRANCHISING COMPANY LLC Ms. Mangen presented the application for an on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor license for People's Organic Franchising Company LLC, dba People's Organic Coffee & Wine Cafe, 3545 Galleria, for the period beginning September 7, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011. She noted all necessary paperwork had been filed, applicable fees paid, and background checks completed. Caridad Versalles, 8624 Oakland Avenue, Bloomington, described their concept to offer coffee in the morning, natural organic foods during the day, and limited wine and tap beer in the evening along with small food plates. This cafe would also accommodate "grab and go" clientele. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving an on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor license for People's Organic Franchising Company LLC, dba People's Organic-Coffee & Wine Cafe, 3545 Galleria, for the period beginning September 7, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -76 ADOPTED — LOT DIVISION, 6116 EWING AVENUE AND 6124 EWING AVENUE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -76, approving a lot division of 6116 and 6124 Ewing Avenue, based on the following findings: 1. The lot area and width of 6116 Ewing is currently non - conforming; it does not meet the median requirements. The resulting lot division would result in both lots meeting the median lot area requirement. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7, 2010 2. The resulting lots comply with all minimum lot size standards of Section 850 of the zoning ordinance. and subject to the following conditions: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. 2. The new fence may be installed after the approving resolution is filed at Hennepin County. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *ENGINEERING SERVICES WEST 44TH STREET APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson authorizing Interim City Manager to approve a proposal for a feasibility study to reconstruct West 44th Street from just east of Brookside Avenue to France Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. 911 DISPATCH CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY APPROVED Ms. Worthington presented the contract to provide 911 emergency dispatching services to the City of Golden Valley for the next three years beginning January, 2011. The Council asked questions of staff and Police Chief Long regarding call volumes, costs incurred, and acknowledged that having an additional dispatcher would result in a benefit to Edina residents. Mr. Long and Ms. Worthington addressed consolidation of dispatch services within Hennepin County and assured the Council that the costs incurred to service Golden Valley would be covered by the proposed contract. Ms. Worthington advised that dispatching options would continue to be explored and discussed by staff. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving an agreement between Edina and Golden Valley for provision of dispatch services and operation and maintenance of the emergency communications center. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 19, 2010, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $171,779.66; Communications Fund $4,282.88; Police Special Revenue $766.70; Working Capital Fund $380,404.46; Equipment Replacement Fund $46,215.59; Art Center Fund $2,727.41; Aquatic Center Fund $6,282.42; Golf Course Fund $31,857.7.5; Ice Arena Fund $138,958.57; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $15,831.32; Liquor Fund $159,416.50; Utility Fund $143,950.34; Storm Sewer Fund $44,896.91; Recycling Fund $37,683.00; PSTF Agency Fund $13,141.34; TOTAL $1,198,194.85 and for approval of payment of claims dated August 26, 2010, and consisting of 54 pages: General Fund $619,095.48; CDBG Fund $3,157.00; Communications Fund $1,278.64; Police Special Revenue $268.00; Working Capital Fund $981,137.31; Equipment Replacement Fund $20,857.63; Art Center Fund $23,793.79; Golf Dome Fund $1,670.15; Aquatic Center Fund $16,368.31; Golf Course Fund $16,997.46; Ice Arena Fund $6,133.01; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $8,740.98; Liquor Fund $209,970.42; Utility Fund $146,174.77; Storm Sewer Fund $174,589.34; Recycling Fund $32.57; PSTF Agency Fund $1,326.03; TOTAL $2,228,250.62; and for approval of payment of claims dated September 2, 2010, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $96,777.78; Communications Fund $378.65; Police Special Revenue $3,585.61; Working Capital Fund $118,277.06; Equipment Replacement Fund $35,541.95; Art Center Fund $2,574.33; Aquatic Center Fund $3,318.93; Golf Course Fund $36,195.79; Ice Arena Fund $3,366.43; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $18,966.43; Liquor Fund $126,504.52; Utility Fund $43,626.39; Storm Sewer Fund $23,075.65; Recycling Fund $2.00; PSTF Agency Fund $4,742.66; TOTAL $516,934.18. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 7, 2010 Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CITY MANAGER CONTRACT WITH SCOTT NEAL APPROVED Mayor Hovland presented the essential terms and conditions of the draft City Manager contract, which Scott Neal had agreed with in principle. Mayor Hovland indicated if the contract was approved by the Council tonight, he would so advise Mr. Neal who would then resign his position with the City of Eden Prairie and begin employment with Edina on November 8, 2010. The Council discussed the contract terms and payment of dues for civic club memberships. Attorney Knutson advised that legal opinions had been rendered indicating that the City could only pay civic club membership fees that qualified as serving a public purpose. He indicated that employer approval was required for membership, and copies of those legal opinions would be provided for the Council's review. The Council acknowledged that, with sick leave and vacation days credited to Mr. Neal in the contract, he would be entitled to a payout of $10,000 should ne leave employment immediately after assuming his new position. The GA-umn-il aGkRewledged that ,should MF. Ne-al le-ave empleyment with Edina, he would be eRtitled te a P-ayout of $1 Qwo.l The Council indicated it understood the rationale and recommendation for a compensation package at the statutory cap even though Edina was smaller in size than Eden Prairie. The Council concurred that Mr. Neal was very talented, knowledgeable, and diligent, and Edina was fortunate it could attract this level of talent. Mayor Hovland and Member Swenson were thanked for their effort to negotiate this exceptional outcome and favorable contract. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving the city manager contract with Scott Neal. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. SEPTEMBER 13, 2010, WORK SESSION SCHEDULED Following discussion, Council consensus was reached to direct staff to schedule a work session on Monday, September 13, 2010, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the request of Shelter Corp. to discuss matters relating to The Water Senior Living Project. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City. Council, September 21, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 7, 2010, meeting available. Page 6 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 2010, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for August 17, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heather Worthington, Executive Director o e Cn • le f�OOxPO� -'�E9� es REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS Agenda Item HRA Item No. II From: John Wallin Action Finance Director Discussion Information Date: September 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -2 Appointing Cell Smith, Interim Executive Director of Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The attached resolution would appoint Ceil Smith the Executive Director for the Housing Redevelopment Authority on an interim basis. A copy of the recommended resolution, as drafted by the City's attorney, is attached for your review. ATTACHMENT: HRA Resolution No. 2010 -2. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-2 RESOLUTION APPOINTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ON AN INTERIM BASIS RECITALS City of Edina A. Heather Worthington, the interim Executive Director of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, has submitted her resignation effective October 6, 2010. B. The City is has appointed Scott Neal who will become the Executive Director of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority on November 8, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: Effective October 6, 2010 Ceil Smith is appointed Executive Director of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority on an interim basis until November 8, 2010. 2. This appointment shall carry with it the duties and responsibilities associated with the office of Executive Director, and Ceil Smith shall be listed as a signatory on all HRA accounts. ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority this 21St day of September, 2010. Attest: Its Executive Director City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Its Chair 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA PLANNING COMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 5:05 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh arrived at 5:10 p.m. Planning Commissioners present: Jeff Carpenter, Arlene Forrest, Michael Fischer, Michael Schroeder, Steve Brown and Kevin Staunton. Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; Cary Teague, Director of Planning; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; Jennifer Bennerotte, Director of Marketing & Communications; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose of the joint meeting was to review challenges and potential solutions for cities relative to issuance of variances since the June 2010 Supreme Court ruling which changed the definition of hardship and virtually eliminated the ability to grant variances. Chair Fischer reviewed the Planning Commission's work to date on the Zoning Ordinance update. He outlined the Commission's goals over the next month relative to the proposed amendments to Edina's zoning ordinance. Director Teague noted that the proposed ordinances would deal with primarily three topics: 1) Non - conforming use /alternative setback ordinance, 2) Planned Unit Development ordinance, and 3) Driveway width ordinance. Mr. Teague explained that staff had reviewed approximately three years of data regarding variances issued within the City of Edina. The Council, Planning Commissioners and staff discussed each proposed ordinance amendment and potential issues relative to each amendment. Issues included: setback for second story additions, height of structures, elevations of new vs. original structure, what happened if variances lapsed, tear downs, effect on modifications /additions to structures in flood plains or near storm water areas, ground water issue, need for Geo Science Engineer's data on remodels /additions, lot coverage, driveway width, permeable surface driveways, benefits and challenges of adopting a PUD ordinance, Sketch Plan Review process and the likelihood of the legislature enacting statute that would relieve the burden of the court decision. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 21, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 13, 2010 5:09 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson was absent. Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; Cary Teague, Director of Planning; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose was to review issues related to the proposed development: The Waters Senior Living of Edina. Interim City Manager Worthington stated that Shelter Corp. had four items to discuss with the City Council: 1) Final Plat, 2) Park Dedication, 3) Potential TIF Pay -As- You -Go District and 4) Issuance of a Conduit Bond. Ms. Worthington noted that staff had reviewed the issues with Shelter Corp and believed that the proposed park dedication was fairly negotiated, but she added the Council must determine its comfort level with each issue. Jay Jenson, Shelter Corp. presented the Waters Senior Living of Edina's proposal for payment of park dedication. Mr. Jenson stated that while it was clear that Shelter Corp. should pay for park dedication, it also was clear that payment should be in relation to use. He proposed a reduction of the amount that would be due according to the ordinance, $695,000. Mr. Jenson requested subtraction of what he termed "public" costs totaling $189,900 and half of "private recreational costs" of $385,000 for facilities built at the Waters. The subtractions would leave a park dedication fee of $312,000. "^F. jeRsen stated the ... W] ITTW Mr.191 M= ... ... The Council and staff had a discussion of the City's park dedication ordinance, its background, implementation, and the latitude granted to Council by this section of Edina's Code. Ms. Worthington noted that park dedication was collected when there was a subdivision of land and could be land donated, land and cash or only cash. She said there must be a relationship between the required dedication and the Park Capital Improvement Program. Director Teague reviewed the results of his preliminary survey of surrounding communities. Concern was expressed over various aspects of the proposed dedication, and staff was directed to supply more background to Council for another discussion. Ms. Worthington said that the proponents have also requested the Council consider two other financing tools: establishment of a Tax Increment Financing District "Pay -As- You -Go District" and use of the City's Conduit Bonding Authority. Mark Ruff, Ehlers Financial Consultant for the City gave a brief overview of what would be required of the Council to establish a TIF District and to allow the use of conduit bonds for this project. Council discussed the "affordability" component of the TIF proposal, aed -alse issues related to the conduit bonding authority, and the question of public benefit to justify the public expense. The proponent stated they would proceed with the project with or without the two financing tools. The final plat and park dedication would most likely be considered by the Council within the next sixty days. The establishment of a TIF District or authorization of conduit bond financing will be discussed at another work session after receiving additional data on these issues. Ms. Worthington announced to the Council her resignation effective October 6, 2010, as she had accepted a position as the Deputy County Manager for Ramsey County. Council directed staff to place this topic for discussion on the work session for September 21, 2010. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m. lespectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 21, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No II. A. From: Debra Mangen ® Action City Clerk 1-1 Discussion 0 Information Date: September 21, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing: Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Amending Section 900 Edina Liquor Code ACTION REQUESTED: Hold the public hearing, review the-draft ordinance and consider granting First Reading. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At their meeting September 7, 2010, the Council reviewed draft language amending Edina's Code to allow more charitable organizations to obtain temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses from the City. At that meeting, the Council directed staff to make changes to the proposed ordinance language and to set a public hearing for September 21, 2010. Staff placed the required public hearing notice in the Edina Sun Current. Attorney Knutson has drafted the revised language for the ordinance amendment and drafted a memorandum - explaining that Edina Code Subsection 900.13 Subdivisions 1 -8 contained many of the additional provisions the Council requested at the September 7th meeting. ATTACHMENT: Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Application Memorandum Roger Knutson Draft Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Edina Code Section 900 f t License on behalf of: Add The Event: Location of Event: City of Edina 4801 West 500 Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Phone: (952) 927 -8861 Fax: (952) 826 -0390 Office Use Only Date Received Police Approval Notice of Hearing Published Council Approval Date Phone No: Street City State Zip Date of Event: Time of Event: Organization's Chief Executive Officer: First Middle Last Date of Birth Organization's Treasurer: Daytime Phone Number Signature First Middle Last Date of Birth Daytime Phone Number Signature THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tar ID Number or Social Security Number. This information maybe used to deny issuance, renewal or transfer of your license if you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties or interest. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, the State of Minnesota Driver License Section, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, and Ramsey County Warrant Office. You signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. Your residence address and telephone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and telephone number. Please sign below to indicate that you have read this notice: Signature X I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number areas follows: Address Telephone Number Contact Person: Contact's Address: Phone No Street City State Zip i r 1 i Date of Last Temporary License: No more than 2 licenses per organization per calendar year. License must have at least 30 days between issue dates. Location of Last Temporary Attach a detailed drawing to scale with access points of the "licensed premises" and proposed signage, (placement, exact dimensions, graphics and wording) shown. Proposed capacity of licensed premises: Barricade materials proposed: Location & number of access points to be used: Explain proposed security: The above - mentioned non - profit corporation or organization hereby applies for a Temporary Intoxicating Liquor License under and pursuant to the Edina City Code with particular attention to Section 900, Subsection 900.13, Subd. 1 through 8, and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A. As per Edina City Code Subsection 900.08 Paragraph L, the above - mentioned applicant is qualified to apply for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. Attach documentation. The above - mentioned non -profit corporation or organization agrees to waive its Constitutional Rights against search and seizure and will freely permit peace officers to inspect its premises and agrees to forfeiture of its license if found to have violated the Edina City Code or Minnesota Statutes providing for the granting of this license. I hereby solemnly swear that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of the Edina City Code and Minnesota Statutes under which this license is granted. Date of Application Signature of Officer Authorized to Sign For Organization Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 20 SEAL Notary Public Required documents: City of Edina application Fee Documentation of non - profit corporation or organization Dept. of Revenue SP:C1 Workers' Compensation State Form #9079 (Complete Both Copies) Liquor Liability certificate (900.05 para C) Permit For Use of City Property (if applicable) Additional Conditions from City Council: License Fee: $200.00 Finance Code: 1400.4132 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Direct Dial: (651) 234 -6215 UmailAddress: rknufson@rk- lmv.coza September 16, 2010 Thomas J, Campbell . Roger N. Knutson Thomas M: Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Pochler Ms. Debra Mangen, City Clerk Soren M. Mattick City of Edina,. John F. I {elly x 50th 4801 West 50 Street Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Edina, Minnesota 55424 Samuel J. Edmunds Marguerite M. McCarron RE: TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES Dear Deb: Enclosed please find revised draft ordinance concerning temporary on -sale liquor licenses. The City Council discussed adding some additional provisions concern ng . police and other issues. I have not. included them in the draft because they are already covered in Section 900.13 of the City Code: 900.13 Special Requirements for Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subsection 900.10.and Subd. 4, Subd. 6 and Subd. 8 of Subsection 900.12; the following special requirements apply to the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating liquor sold pursuant to a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued in accordance with this section: Subd. 1 Licensed Premises. The licensed premises must have a physical barrier separating the licensed premises from other areas so as to prevent the passing of patrons in locations other than through approved entrances and exits. . Subd. 2 Sales and Consumption. No sales or consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted beyond the licensed premises. Subd. 3 Manager. The Council may require that the licensed premises be under the direct supervision of a manager approved by the Police Chief. In approving the qualifications of the manager, the Police Chief shall consider the manager's experience C nter Curve 380 Corporate Center Curve 1380 in overseeing the operation of an establishment that serves alcoholic beverages. 317 . Eagan, 651 -452 -5000 Fax 651- 452 -5550 -wvw.ck- law.com Ms. Debra Mangen, City Clerk City of Edina September 16, 2010 Page 2 Subd. 4 Police Protection. If required by the Council, the applicant shall provide, at the applicant's expense, policing of the licensed premises by security personnel approved by the Police Chief. Subd. 5 Age of Servers. For a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, all persons engaged in the service of alcoholic beverages must be not less than 21 years of age. Subd. 6 Hours of Sale and Consumption. In addition to the provisions of Subd. 7 and Subd. 8 of Subsection 900.10 of this Code, the Council may further restrict the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages pursuant to a temporary license to certain hours. Subd. 7 Sale Prices. No licensee shall promote the consumption of alcoholic beverages on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in prices which are less than those normally charged during the license term including, but not limited to, two- for -one offers, happy hours, or other similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters. Subd. 8 Other Requirements. The City Council may impose other requirements as it deems necessary to promote public safety. Regards, Roger N. Knutson RNK:sm Enclosure ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING LIQUOR THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 900.04, Subparagraph F of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: F. Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - The City Council may issue to (1) a club or charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organization in existence for at least three years, (2) a political committee registered under Section 10A.14, or (3) a State university, a temporary license for the on -sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the municipality sponsored by the licensee. The license may authorize the on -sale of intoxicating liquor and may authorize on -sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full -year on- sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. The licenses are subject to the terms, including a license fee, imposed by the City. Licenses issued under this subdivision are subiect to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except Sections 340A.409 and 340A.504, subdivision 3, paragraph (d), and those laws and ordinances which by their nature are not applicable. Licenses under this subdivision are not valid unless first approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety. permits the ear;-sale of 2' pereent malt Wq Uer intevisating malt liquor Wine .+nri intevien }inn liesper at events spensered by pertain „rgaRizatiens. Not more than two such licenses shall be issued to the same organization or corporation or location in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issued for not more than three consecutive days. sale of Z v 2 nereent malt limier , intevinatine malt lirquerr e r win ne only _ . Section 2. Subsection 900.08, Subparagraph L of the Edina City Code is deleted: - •• - - - - Section 3. Subsection 900.09, Subdivision 1c and Subdivision 6 of the Edina City Code are amended to provide as follows: 1 C. Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study accredited by the State. A location which holds a license under this Section shall not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of worship or school that was newly located in its proximity after license issuance. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses or Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses. Subd. 6 Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, not more than four Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses t4GesseTshall be issued for any one location in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. For purposes of this paragraph, 'location" shall mean a physical location within 1,000 feet or the perimeter of the premises first licensed in the calendar year. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. City of Edina CHAPTER 9. LIQUOR Section 900 - Sale of Liquor and Wine; Licensing Liquor 900.01 900.01 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise clearly indicates, the following terms shall have the stated meanings: Bar. A counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine or liquor is served. Commissioner. The State Commissioner of Public Safety. Cafe. See definition of "restaurant" in this Subsection. Club. Any corporation duly, organized under the laws of the State for civic, fraternal, social. or business purposes, or for intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of. sports, which shall have more than 50 members, and which for more than one year shall have owned, hired or leased a building or space in a building of such extent and character as may be suitable and adequate for the reasonable and comfortable accommodation of its members, and whose affairs and management are conducted by a board of directors, executive committee, or other similar body chosen by the members at a. meeting held for the purpose, none of whose members, officers, agents or employees are paid, directly or indirectly, any compensation by way of profit from the distribution or sale of beverages to the members of the club or to its guests, beyond the amount of such reasonable salary or wages as may be fixed and voted each year by the directors or other governing body. Food Establishment License. A license issued by the City under the provisions of Section 721 of this Code. Hotel. An establishment where food and lodging are regularly furnished to transients and which has a dining room serving the general public at tables and having facilities for seating at least 30 guests at one time, and at least 50 guest rooms. Intoxicating Liquor. Ethyl, alcohol, and distilled, fermented, spirituous, vinous and malt beverages containing in excess of 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight. Intoxicating Malt Liquor. Any beer, ale or other beverage made from malt by fermentation and containing more than 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight. License. A license granted pursuant to.this Section. Licensed Premises. The area shown in the license application as the place where wine or liquor will be served or consumed. Liquor. 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating liquor, and intoxicating-malt liquor. Meal. Entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. 900 -1 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.02 1 Off -Sale. Retail sale in the original package for consumption away from the premises only. On -Sale. Sale for consumption on the premises only. Original Package. Any container or receptacle holding liquor, in which the liquor is corked or sealed at the place of manufacture. Restaurant. An establishment', under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment, meals are regularly served at tables to ' the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests, and which has a seating capacity for not fewer than 30 guests at one time. ; Y. Sale, Sell, Sold. All barters, exchanges, gifts; sales, and- other means used to obtain, dispose of, or furnish any liquor or wine or any . other beverage, directly or indirectly, as part ' of a commercial transaction, in violation or evasion of the provisions of this Section, but does not include sales by State licensed liquor wholesalers selling to licensed retailers. State Established Legal Drinking Age. For purposes of this Section, the State established legal age for consumption of liquor and wine is 21 years of age. 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor. Any potable beverage with an alcoholic content of more than one -half of one percent by volume and not more than 3.2 percent by weight. Wine. Vinous beverage created by fermentation. 900.02 Off -Sale Limited to Municipal Liquor Stores; Dispensary Established. No intoxicating liquor, intoxicating malt liquor or wine shall be sold, or caused ' to be sold at off -sale within the City by any person, or by any store or establishment, or by any agent or employee of such person, store or establishment, except by the City and on the premises in the City occupied by the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine. There is hereby established a municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale and on -sale of liquor, and wine. The dispensary shall be located at such suitable places in the City as the Council determines by resolution. Subd. 1 Off -Sale Dispensary. The following shall apply to the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine: A. The dispensary shall be under the control of the Manager. The Manager may appoint employees as deemed necessary to operate the dispensary in full compliance with this Section and State Law. No person under the State established legal drinking age shall be employed in the dispensary. B. . The Manager may require persons employed in the dispensary to furnish a surety bond to the City in the same manner as prescribed by Subsection 115.12 of this Code. 900 -2 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.04 C. Subject to the requirements of 'M.S. 340A.504, the hours of operation and the dispensary shall be established by resolution of.the Council. D. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in Subsection 900.10 except Subd. 7 thereof shall apply to the dispensary. Subd. 2. On -Sale Dispensary. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in subsections 900.10, 900.11 and 900.12 shall apply to the municipal liquor dispensary for the on -sale of liquor and wine." 900.03 License Required. No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers. to the extent authorized by law, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any ' device, shall sell at off -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor or at on -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor without first having obtained a license, other than sales by the City at its municipal liquor dispensary. 900.04 License Types. Licenses shall be of eight types: A. On -Sale Club Liquor License - permits the on -sale of liquor and wine at qualifying clubs. Only establishments possessing an On -Sale Club License on December 31, 1998, shall be eligible for receiving an On -Sale . Club Liquor License pursuant to this Section. B. On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - permits the on -sale of liquor and wine at qualifying hotels and restaurants. A qualifying hotel with multiple points of liquor sale and service within the hotel may operate under a single On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License provided that the sale of food and liquor is under the exclusive ownership and control of the licensee. Any restaurant or other facility serving liquor'-within a hotel which operates, under separate ownership or control shall be considered a distinct entity for purposes of -this Section. C. Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - permits the off -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor at certain retail establishments. D. On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - permits the on -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor at certain retail establishments. E. Wine License - permits the on -sale of wine at qualifying hotels and restaurants. (Intoxicating malt liquor may be sold on premises holding both a 3.2 percent malt liquor on -sale license and a wine license.) F. Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - permits the on -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, wine and intoxicating liquor at events sponsored by certain organizations. Not more than two such licenses shall be issued to the same organization or corporation in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issued for not more than three consecutive days.- The City Council may restrict such licenses to the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor; intoxicating malt, liquor or wine only. 900 -3 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.5 G. Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License - permits the on -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor at events sponsored by certain organizations. Not more than two such licenses shall be issued to the same organization or corporation in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issuedfor not more than three consecutive. days. H. Sunday On -Sale License . - permits the on -sale of intoxicating liquor on Sunday. Only persons holding an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License or an On- Sale Club Liquor License may hold a Sunday On -Sale License 900.05 License Applications; Renewal. An .application for any license required. by :. this Section or the renewal of an existing license shall be made on forms provided by the Clerk. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code, shall apply to all licenses required by this. Section, and to the holders of such licenses; ;except that'licenses and renewals shall be granted or denied in accordance with Subsection 900.06. All applications shall be 'accompanied by the fees set forth in Subsection 900.07. Every 'license issued under this Section shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on April 1 following its date of issuance. Renewal applications shall be submitted at least 60 days but not more than 150 days before expiration of the license. If, in the judgment of 'ihe Council as to off -sale and on -sale licenses, good and sufficient cause.for the applicant's failure to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the Council, may, if the other provisions of this. Section are complied with, grant the license. In addition to the application requirements provided in Section 160 of this Code, applicants shall also provide the following: A. The type of license the applicant seeks; B. A description of the type of business to be transacted on the licensed premises; C. Proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by M.S. 340A.801 in the manner and to the extent required by M.S. 340A.409. If the applicant claims exemption from the requirements of said Statute, proof of exemption shall be established by affidavit given by the applicant in form and substance acceptable to the Clerk; D. All forms and information required by the Police Chief, the ' Minnesota Department of Public Safety and the Minnesota Department of Revenue; E. Any affidavits of the applicant as required by the Clerk, on forms provided by the Clerk, in support of the application; F. Authorization to release information obtained in connection with the application; G. A statement signed by the applicant stating that he or she has reviewed and understands the pertinent provisions of this Section and State law; H. In the case of an application' for a Wine License, or On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, the applicant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Clerk as to compliance with the requirements of Subd. 2 of Subsection 900.12 as to the completion of an alcohol awareness program; 9004 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.7 I. In the case of an application for a Wine License or On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, the applicant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Clerk as to compliance with the requirements of Subd. 3 of Subsection 900.12 as to the percentage of food sold on the licensed premises. This requirement shall be established by an affidavit of the licensee on a form provided by the Clerk. The affidavit shall be given with each application for issuance or renewal on a Wine License or an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, or at other times as the Clerk may request. If the application is for the renewal of a Wine License or an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, the affidavit shall also include the actual percentage of gross receipts attributable to the sale of food during the immediately preceding 12 -month period. The Clerk shall require that any such affidavit be verified and confirmed, on a form provided by the Clerk, by a Certified Public Accountant. Failure or refusal of a licensee to give such affidavit with such application, or on request of the Clerk, or any false statement in any such affidavit, shall be grounds for denial, suspension or revocation of all licenses held by such licensee. J. In the case of an application for a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. The applicant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Clerk that the applicant complies with the requirements of Subsection 900.08 as to being a qualified corporation or organization. K. Any other information deemed necessary by the Manager to undertake consideration of the application. 900.06 Consideration of Application; Public Hearing. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by Subsection 900.04 and to the holders of such licenses, provided that all licenses shall be granted or denied by the City Council and the Commissioner, if required by State law. The City Council shall conduct a public hearing on the application for a new On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License within a reasonable period following receipt of a complete application and completion of the investigation required by Subsection 900.05. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper not less than ten days before the date of the hearing. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future meeting. No hearing shall be required for the renewal or the transfer of an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor license. 900.07 Fees. Subd. 1 Application Fee. The annual license application fee shall be the amount set forth in Section. 185 of this Code. When a new Wine License or On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License is issued for a portion of a year, the annual license application fee shall be prorated at the rate of one twelfth of the license fee per month or portion of a month remaining in the license year at the time of application. The annual license application fee for a Wine License, or for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor 900 -5 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.8 License may be refunded, less costs incurred by the City as determined by the Clerk, in the event that the application is withdrawn by the applicant or denied by the Council. Subd. 2 On -sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal Fee. A business with an On- sale Intoxicating Liquor License that passes the annual compliance checks, with no violations carrying a penalty of $500 or greater, under the Administrative Liquor Enforcement Penalty matrix, shall be eligible for a reduction in the annual license fee. The annual license fee reduction shall be $500, up to a maximum of $1,000 for two consecutive license years with no violations. Subd. 3 Refunds. A monthly pro -rata share of the annual license fee for a Wine License or an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued pursuant to this Section may be refunded, less the cost of issuance as determined by the Clerk, if: A. The business permanently ceases to operate; B. The license is transferred to a new licensee in accordance with Subsection 900.13 and the City receives a license fee for the remainder of the license term from the transferee; or C. A premises licensed to sell wine receives an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License prior to the expiration of the Wine License. In this instance, a pro -rata share of the Wine License fee may be refunded. Subd. 4 Investigation Fees. Upon application for a new or the transfer of an existing Wine License, On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, On -Sale 3.2 Liquor License or Off -Sale 3.2 Liquor License, the applicant shall deposit $500.00 with the City for the investigation fee. If the investigation requires an out -of -state investigation, an additional $2,000.00 shall be deposited before further processing of the application by the City. The Clerk may from time to time require the deposit of additional investigation fees up to the limits provided herein before further processing of the application if the cost of investigation exceeds the amounts previously deposited. The cost of the investigation shall be based on the expense involved, but in no event shall it exceed $500.00 if the investigation is limited to the State or $10,000.00 if outside the State. All deposited monies not expended on the investigation shall be refunded to the applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in excess of the deposit shall be paid prior to consideration of the license application by the Council. Investigation fees for license renewal shall not exceed $200.00 unless there is a change of ownership of more than 10% cumulatively over the then existing license period. 900.08 Persons Ineligible for License. The following restrictions apply to any applicant who is a natural person, a general partner if the applicant is a partnership or a corporate officer if the applicant is a corporation. No license shall be granted to: Any manufacturer, brewer, or wholesaler as defined in M.S. 340A.101, or any manufacturer of 3.2 percent malt liquor, or to any person who has a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in such manufacturer, brewer or wholesaler. A. Any person under the State established legal drinking age. 900 -6 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.8 B. Any person convicted of any willful violation of any law of the United States or any provision of State Law or this Code with regard to the manufacture, sale or distribution of liquor. C. Any person not eligible under M.S. 340A.402, the regulations of the Commissioner or Section 160 of this Code. D. Any person who has (i), been convicted, within the five years prior to the application for a license, of any violation of any law of the United States, the State, or any other state or territory, or, of any local ordinance with regard to: (a) the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor or other controlled substances as defined by State Statute, (b) gambling, (c) theft, or (d) vice; or (ii) had an intoxicating liquor license, including a wine on -sale license, revoked for any Violation of any statutes, ordinances or regulations relating to the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession of liquor or wine. E. Any person who has applied for or holds a, federal wholesale or retail liquor dealer's special stamp or a federal or State gambling or gaming stamp or license. F. Any person who is an employee or elected official of the City. G. Any person who has falsified any information given either in the application or in the process of investigation. H. Any person who upon renewal, has been found in violation of any provision of this Section or applicable State Law. I. If an individual, any person-who is not a U.S. citizen or resident alien. J. Any person who is financially indebted to a person who is disqualified under this Subd. K. If for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, any organization other than the Edina Chamber of Commerce, the 50th and France Business and Professional Association, the Edina Community Foundation or the City. A holder of a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License -shall not be eligible to hold a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Liquor License during all or part of the same license term. L. If for a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License, any person who is not a non - profit corporation or organization that has been in existence for at least three years where the serving of alcoholic beverages is incidental to and not the main purpose of the organization .and which is organized for i) charitable or religious purposes for which gifts are deductible from the income of the donor under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now enacted or as supplemented- or amended, ii), service to the nation, state or community, iii) social purposes, iv) promotion of sports, v) promotion of persons to elective office, or vi) promotion of business within the community. A holder of a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License shall not be eligible to hold a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License during all or part of 'the same license term. 900 -7 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.09 M.. If for an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, any person who holds an interest in an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License or has made application for.such a license for more than three locations in the City. It is the intent hereof that no person may possess or hold an interest in more than three On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses at one time in the , City. For purposes hereof, "interest includes :any,.. pecuniary interest in the ownership, operation, management or profits of the establishment, but does not include: i) bona fide loans, rental agreements, open accounts or other obligations held with or without security arising out of the ordinary and regular course of business or selling or leasing merchandise,..- fixtures or supplies to such establishment or ii) any interest of five percent or .less in any corporation holding an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License 900.09 Places Ineligible for a License Subd. 1 General Restrictions. No off -sale or 'on -sale license shall be granted or renewed for: A. Any property on which taxes, assessments or other financial claims of the State; County or City .are due, .delinquent or unpaid. B. Any property on which the business is to be conducted is owned by a person who is ineligible for a license pursuant to Subsection 900.08 C. Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study accredited by the State. A location which holds a license under this Section shall not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of worship or school that was newly located in its proximity after license issuance. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses. D. Any property where a license issued under this Section has been revoked during the preceding year unless the issuance of the license is unanimously approved by the Council then present. E. Any property where the conduct of the business is prohibited by Section 850 of this Code. F. Any property not eligible under M.S. 340A and the regulations of the Commissioner. G. Any property used as asexually oriented business as defined by Section 850 of this Code. Subd. 2 Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt .Liquor Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License shall be granted to any theater, recreation establishment, public dancing place or establishment holding any on -sale license. Subd.3 On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd.1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License 900 -8 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.09 shall be granted for establishments other than (i) private clubs which have been incorporated for more than ten years and which own and operate club houses for their members in which the serving of such liquor is incidental to and not the major purpose of such club, (ii) restaurants, (iii) golf courses, (iv) the Edina Golf Dome, (v) bowling centers and (vi) hotels. The provisions of this Subdivision do not apply to Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses. Subd. 4 Wine Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no Wine License shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the PCD -1, PCD -2, PCD -3 Subdistricts, the Mixed Development District or the Planned Office District. Subd. 5 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to i) any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3, POD -2 Subdistricts or the Mixed Development District as established by Section 850 of this Code; ii) any amusement or recreation establishment including amusement arcades, pool halls or establishments offering amusement devices which means: A. A machine which upon the insertion of a coin, slug or other token, or upon payment of a fee, operates, or may be operated, as a game, contest or other amusement. B. Miniature pool tables, bowling machines, shuffle boards, electric rifle or gun ranges, and machines patterned after baseball, basketball, hockey and similar games and like machines. C. Amusement devices designated for and used exclusively by children, such as, but not limited to, kiddie cars, miniature airplane rides, mechanical horses, and other miniature mechanical devices In addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any establishment located in the PCD -2 Subdistrict which will contain more than 200 seats; provided, however, a premises in the PCD -2 Subdistrict holding a wine license issued by the City which was in effect on December 31, 1998, and which contains more that 200 seats may be issued an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, but the licensed premises shall not be thereafter expanded to include more seats than existed on December 31, 1998. For purposes of the preceding sentence, outdoor, seasonal dining areas shall not be included in the seat count provided that such outdoor seating comprises 20 percent or less of the total seating capacity of the licensed premises. In addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any establishment that has bowling lanes or bocce courts except to a restaurant and subject to the following: A. Not more than 50% of the gross floor area of the licensed premises shall comprise bowling lanes or bocce ball courts. For purposes hereof, each bowling lane 900 -9 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.10 shall be deemed to measure 650 square feet and each bocce ball lane shall be deemed to measure 900 square feet. B. Machines or amusement devices as defined by Section 220 of this Code shall not be permitted in the licensed premises. C. Bowling lanes and bocce courts and lanes shall be located indoors. All exterior windows and doors adjoining areas occupied by bowling lanes or bocce ball courts must remain closed between the hours of 10 PM and 9 AM. D. Outdoor games are prohibited. Subd. 6 Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd 1 of this Subsection, not more than four Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses and not more than two Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses shall be issued for any one location in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. For purposes of this paragraph, "location" shall mean a physical location within 1000 feet or the perimeter of the premises first licensed in the calendar year. 900.10 General Restrictions; Conditions of Sale. Subd. 1 Conduct. Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of the licensee's place of business and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order. Subd. _ 2 Age. No wine or liquor shall be sold to any person under the State established legal drinking age, or to an intoxicated person, directly or indirectly. Subd. 3 Under Age Workers. No person under the age of 18 shall serve or sell liquor or wine. Subd. 4 Gambling and Prostitution. No licensee shall keep, possess or operate, or permit the keeping, possession or operation on the licensed premises, or in any room adjoining the licensed premises controlled by the licensee, any slot machines, dice or other gambling equipment as defined in M.S. 349.30, nor permit any gambling therein, nor permit the licensed premises or any room in the same or in any adjoining building, directly or indirectly under licensee's control, to be used as a resort for prostitutes or other disorderly persons; provided, however, that lawful gambling may be carried on if allowed by this Code and where allowed by a license issued pursuant to M.S. 349 or this Code. Subd. 5 Manufacturer or Distiller of Malt Liquor. No equipment or fixture in any licensed place shall be owned in whole or in part by any manufacturer or brewer, as defined in M.S. 340A, of wine or liquor. Subd. 6 Open to Inspection. All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by any police officer or other designated officer or employee of the City at any time there are persons within the licensed premises. 900 -10 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.10 Subd. 7 Hours - of Sale. The hours and days of sale shall be as set forth in M.S. 340A.504. Except, however: D. Establishments holding a Wine License under this Section or establishments holding both an On -Sale Club Liquor License and a Sunday On -Sale License under" this Section may sell intoxicating liquor or wine in conjunction with the sale of.food between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 midnight on Sundays, provided that the licensee is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Air Act, and E. Establishments holding both an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and a Sunday ` On -Sale License may sell intoxicating liquor and wine in conjunction with the sale of food between the hours of 10:00 A.M. on Sundays and r:00 A %M. on Mondays. Subd. 8 Hours of Consumption. No liquor or wine shall be consumed by any person on, in or about a licensed premises more than 30 minutes following the time established by this Subsection for cessation of the sale of wine or liquor. Subd. - 9 No Liquor or Wine in Non - Licensed Food Establishments. Except as permitted by a license issued pursuant to this Section, no person shall take or carry any wine or liquor into any food establishment as defined in Section 721 of this Code. Subd. 10 Mixing or Sale for Mixing Prohibited. Except as permitted by a license issued pursuant to this Section, no person shall mix with liquor or wine or sell for the purpose of mixing with liquor or wine, any soft drink, other liquor or beverage in any food establishment as defined in Section 721 of this Code. - Subd. 11 Illegal to Permit Mixing. Except as permitted by a license issued pursuant to this Section, no person shall consume, or permit the consumption, mixing or spiking of any beverage by adding to the same any liquor, in any building or place operated as a food establishmentas defined in Section 721 of this Code. The fact that any person in any food establishment, as defined in Section 721 of this Code, sold any liquid or beverage to a person who thereupon and therein added to such liquid or beverage any liquor or wine shall be prima facie evidence that such liquid or beverage was sold by such person for, the purpose of adding liquor or wine and shall be prima facie evidence that such person and the person's employer permitted the mixing or spiking of such liquid by adding wine or liquor. Subd. 12 Bottle Clubs Prohibited. Except as permitted by a license issued pursuant to this Section, establishments or clubs that directly or indirectly allow the consumption or display of wine or liquor, or knowingly serve any liquid for the purpose of mixing With liquor or wine, shall be prohibited. Permits for bottle clubs issued by the Commissioner under M.S. 340A.414 shall not be approved by the Council. Subd. 13 Posting of License. A license issued under this Section shall be posted in a conspicuous place in the licensed premises. 900 -11 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.12 Subd. 14 Compact °and Contiguous Premises. A license :issued under this Section is only effective for the compact and contiguous space specified in, the approved license application. No sales or consumption of wine or liquor shall be permitted beyond the licensed premises. The licensed premises shall - not be increased in size or seating capacity during the then license period. Subd. 15 Sobriety and Order. A licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of business being operated and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order. Subd. 16 Adult Entertainment Prohibited. The Findings, Purpose and Objectives of Section 1,345 of the City Code:are.hereby incorporated by reference. No licensee shall permit any specified sexual activities, the presentation or display of any specified anatomical, areas or the conduct of a sexually oriented business all as defined by Section 850 of this Code on the licensed premises or in areas adjoining the licensed premises where such activities or the conduct of such a business can be seen by patrons of the licensed premises. Subd. 17 State Law. All applicable provisions of State Law shall be complied with in connection, with the sale of wine and liquor. 900.11 Special Requirements for the On -Sale of 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor. In addition to the requirements imposed by Subsection 900. 10, the following special requirements apply to the on -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor: Subd. 1 Place of Serving and Consumption. 3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant to a 3.2 percent malt liquor license shall be served and consumed at tables in the dining or refreshment room on the licensed premises and shall: not be consumed or served at bars; provided, the same may be consumed or served at the following locations: A. At counters where food is regularly served and consumed. B. On decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the licensed premises. C. On grounds of a golf course. Subd. 2 Temporary Licenses. The provisions of Subd. 1 of this Subsection do not apply to 3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant to a Temporary 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License. 900.12 Special Requirements for the On -Sale of Wine, Intoxicating Malt Liquor and Intoxicating Liquor. In addition to the requirements of Subsection 90.0. 10, the following special requirements apply to the sale of wine, intoxicating malt liquor and intoxicating liquor sold pursuant to a Wine License or and On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued in accordance with this Section: Subd. 1 Licensed Premises. The licensed premises must: A. Have an exclusive entrance from and exit to the exterior of the building in which the license premises is located or to a public concourse or public lobby, 900 -12 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edii a Liquor 900.12 and have a physical barrier separating the licensed premises from other areas so as to prevent the passing of patrons other than through the required entrances and exits. - B. Have a valid food establishment license issued pursuant to Section 721 of this Code and have adequate space, as determined by the Sanitarian, for the storage, preparation and handling or service of food, wine, and liquor. C. The premises shall not' have more than 15 percent of its seating capacity located at a bar or service counter. Subd. 2 Alcohol Awareness Training. A. Within 30 days following the issuance of a new Wine License or a new On- Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, not less than 75 % of the .employees authorized to serve or sell wine or liquor on the licensed premises shall have completed an alcohol awareness program approved by the Police Chief. B. Not less than 75% of the employees authorized to serve or sell wine or liquor on the licensed premises must complete an alcohol awareness program approved by the Police Chief within 90 days prior to an application for license renewal for a Wine License or a On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. Subd. 3 Percentage of Food Sold. Not less than 60 percent of the restaurant's or hotel's gross receipts from the combined sale of food, non = alcoholic beverages, wine and liquor, on an annual basis, shall be attributable to the sale of food and non- alcoholic beverages. Subd. 4 Limit of Alcohol Strength. No wine over 14 percent alcohol by volume may be sold or consumed on a premises holding a Wine License. Subd. 5 Denied Sales or Consumption. No sales or consumption of wine or liquor shall be permitted beyond the licensed premises. Subd. 6 Container Volume Restrictions. Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter: Subd. 7 Sale Prices. No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine or liquor on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in prices which are less than those normally charged on the then regularly used menu, including, but not limited to, two - for -one or similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters. Subd. 8 Diluting, Changing, or Tampering with Wine or Liquor Prohibited. No licensee shall sell, offer for sale or keep for sale, wine or liquor in any original package that has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall directly or through any other person, dilute, or in any manner tamper with, the contents of any original package so as to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original package. Possession on the premises by the licensee of any wine in the original package differing in composition, alcoholic content or type from the wine received from the manufacturer 90043 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.13 or wholesaler from whom it was purchased shall, be prima facie evidence that the contents of the original package have been, diluted, changed or tampered with. Subd. 9 . Sales in Hotels. No sale of wine or liquor shall be made to or in guest rooms of hotels unless: A. The rules of such hotel provide.for the service of meals in guest rooms; B. The sale of such wine and liquor is made in the manner which ;conforms to the requirements of Subsection 900.12; C.. Such sales ,is incidental to the regular service of meals to guests in their rooms; and D. The rules. of such hotel- and the description, location, and number of such guest rooms are fully set out in the license application. 900.13 Special Requirements for Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subsection 900.09 and Subd 4, Subd 6 and Subd 8 of Subsection 900.12, the following special requirements apply to :the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating liquor sold pursuant to ,.a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License or a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued in accordance with `this'Section: Subd. l Licensed, Premises. The licensed premises must have a physical barrier separating the licensed: premises from other areas so as to prevent the passing of patrons in locations other than through approved entrances and exits. Subd. 2 Sales and Consumption. No sales or consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted beyond the licensed.premises. Subd. 3 Manager. The Council may require that the licensed premises be under the direct supervision of a manager approved by the Police Chief. In approving the qualifications of the manager, the Police Chief shall consider the manager's experience in overseeing the operation of an establishment that serves alcoholic beverages. Subd. 4 Police °Protection. If required by the. Council, the applicant shall provide, at the applicant's expense, policing of the license premises by security personnel approved by the Police Chief. Subd 5 Age of ,Servers. For. a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, all persons engaged in the service of alcoholic beverages must be not less than 21 years of age. Subd. 6 Hours of Sale and Consumption. In addition to the provisions of Subd. 7 and Subd. 8 of Subsection 900.10 of this Code, the Council may further restrict the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages pursuant to a temporary license to certain hours. Subd. 7 Sale Prices. No licensee shall promote the consumption of alcoholic beverages on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in prices 900 -14 Supplement 2010 -01 -City-of Edina, - . _.. Liquor 900.17 which are less than those normally charged during the license term including, but not limited to, two- for -one .offers, happy hours, or other similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters. . Subd. 8 Other Requirements. The City Council may impose other requirements, as it deems necessary to promote public safety. 900.14 , Restrictions on Transfer of License. No license, shall be transferred to any person or premises by 'the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted; ;by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise or descent or involuntarily by the operation of .law, without the person and premises to whom and to;.which the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing all of the information required in an original application, and complying with all requirements for an original license, and receiving the approyal ' of the Council, and where required, the Commissioner. Any change in the persons named in the original _application or any change in the information in such original application shall be deemed a transfer for the purposes of this Section. Provided, however, the following changes, shall not be deemed a transfer: A. A change in the ownership of a limited partnership comprising 10% or less cumulatively of the limited partnership during the then license period; B. A change in ownership of a corporation comprising 10% or less cumulatively of the stock owners during the then license period; or C. A change in one of the corporation's officers during the term of the then license. Provided, however, the corporation shall give notice of a change, in officer to the Clerk and the new officer shall comply with all requirements of this Section Wand Section 160 of this Code. 900.15 Penalties; Revocation or Suspension. The penalty and remedy provisions of M.S. 340A.415 are hereby adopted and made a part of this Code and shall be useable by the City to enforce this . Section in addition to the provisions of Sections 100 and 160 of this Code. .Provided, however, the hearing required by said Statute before a license can be suspended or revoked shall be before the Council and shall be held. pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 160 of this Code. 900.16 Inactive Licenses. The City Council may revoke an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License granted to an establishment which has i) failed to make satisfactory progress toward completion of the construction of a new licensed premises or ii) ceased operation for a period of six months or more. The provisions of Subsection 900.14 shall apply to such revocations. 900.17 Incorporation by Reference. The provisions of M.S. 340A. which are referenced in this Section are hereby adopted 'and incorporated by reference and made a part of this Section, including all regulations of the Commissioner which relate to such incorporated provisions of M.S. 340A. History: Ord 902 adopted 1- 11 -84; amended by Ord 902 -Al 4- 24 -85; Ord 902 -A2 12- 11 -85; Ord 902 -A3 4- 23 -86; Ord 902 -A4 6- 25 -86; Ord 902 -A6 12- 19 -89; Ord 902 -A7 5- 23 -90; 'Ord 902 -A8 3- 17 -91; Ord 902 -A9 3- 27 -91; Ord 902 -A9; Ord 902 -A10 4- 10 -91; Subsection 900.22 repealed by Ord 1993 -1 1- 20 -93; Ord 1993 -11 10- 27 -93; Subsection 900.26 repealed by Ord 900 -15 Supplement 2010 -01 City of Edina Liquor 900.17 1994 -10 10- 12 -94; amended by Ord 1995 -11 12- 19 -95; amended by Ord 1997 -14 12 -1 -97; amended by Ord 1998 -3 4 -6 -98, recodified by Ord 1999 -4 3 -1 -99; amended by 1999 -7; 3 -15- 99; amended by Ord 2000 -13 12- 19 -00; amended by Ord 2001 -6; amended by Ord 2001 -8, 1- 20-01; amended by Ord 2002 -10, 1- 21 -03; amended by Ord 2004 -02, 3- 16 -04; Ord. 2004 -08, 5- 27 -04; Ord 2005 -05 6- 30 -05; Ord 2006 -10, 12 -5 -06; Ord 2008 -07, 06- 17 -08; 2010 -13, 6 -15- 10 Reference: Minnesota Laws 1973, Chapter 441 (Sunday sale licenses for clubs); Minnesota Laws, 1980, Chapter 410 (Sales at Edina Foundation Ball), M.S. 340A, 349 Cross Reference: Sections 100, 160, 185, 721, 850; Subsection 115.12; Subsections 1230.02; 1230.07; 1230.08 900 -16 Supplement 2010 -01 tNA. oe •j • �CORPOPA� °- 1888 AGENDA ITEM ILB Continue Public Hearing to October 5, 2010 New Liquor License Pinstripes No packet data ❑ Oral presentation F-] Information coming �Af � ow e Cn REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III.A. From: Name of Author: John Keprios Title: Director of Parks and Recreation Date: Date of Meeting: September 21, 2010 Subject: Installation of Hockey Rink Lights and Poles — Pamela Park & Walnut Ridge Park Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: September 1, 2010 October 1, 2010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Gunnar Electric, Inc. 1. $29,450.00 2. Sports Technology, Inc. 2. $31,450.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Gunnar Electric, Inc. $29,450.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for installation of two (2) 40 foot galvanized steel poles, pre- stressed concrete bases, eight (8) Musco Lighting sport light fixtures and luminaire assemblies; each to be placed at Pamela Park and Walnut Ridge Park hockey rinks. On August 17, 2010, the Council approved the purchase of the poles and assemblies from Graybar Company which was purchased through the U.S. Communities Cooperative Bid Program #416005118 for a total of $39,316.11. On that purchase order request, I mistakenly stated that the purchase included installation; whereas, I intended to state that it included purchase and delivery. This installation purchase order request includes costs for permits, labor, wiring, conduit and miscellaneous parts needed to install the 40 foot steel poles, pre- stressed concrete bases and all specified light fixtures and assemblies. This is a 2010 Capital Improvement Plan project and total project costs are estimated to be $120,000; however, we have been awarded a $60,000 grant from the Hennepin Sports Program of Hennepin County for this project. If approved by Council, the light standards and fixtures will be installed no later than November 1, 2010. gnature The Recommended Bid is Y within budget not within budget Park and Recreation Departmen John Wallin, Finance Director Heather Worthington, City Mdnager o /te Cn •J'� %���. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE lase TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 21, 2010 AGENDA ITEM III.B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 70th Street Improvements, Contract No. ENG 10 -3; Improvement Nos. BA -367, SS -457, STS -369, WM -503, TS 43 & 44, and L57 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE ber 9. 2010 Company 1. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 2. Palda & Sons, Inc. 3. Max Steininger, Inc. 4. Valley Paving, Inc. 5. Eureka Construction 6. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 7. Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. 8. C.S. McCrossan, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. November 9. 2010 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 2,819,703.75 $ 3,074,185.87 $ 3,100,842.65 $ 3,111,412.74 $ 3,183,433.04 $ 3,307,636.60 $ 3,613,775.49 $ 3,713,734.65 $ 29819,703.75 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for street and utility improvements for West 70th Street from TH100 to France Avenue. The project includes reconstructing the existing roadway with a bituminous pavement, installing integral concrete curb and gutter and bike lanes, installing a traffic signal at West .Shore Drive and West 70th Street, upgrading the traffic signal at Cornelia Drive and West 70th Street, replacing the overhead street lights, rehabilitating the sanitary sewers and watermain where needed, and upgrading the storm sewer systems. Landscaping for the project will be bid this coming spring and installed in the spring of 2012. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the December 15, 2009, Public Hearing. This project will be funded by MSA funds, special assessments, and respective utility funds. The Feasibility Study overall, project cost estimate was $3,057,600. Staff recommends awarding the project to Northwest Asphalt. Inc. ignature The Recommended Bid is X within budget Public Works — Engineering Department not within bud et J n Wallin, Finance Director Heather Worthington, Interim Ci Manager 4A, o Le W\�N 1 88 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.A. From: John Wallin ® Action Finance Director F-1 ` Discussion Information Date: September 21, 2010 Subject: Call for Sale of Bonds — Resolution No. 2010 -78 Providing for Sale of $9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A and Resolution 2010 -79 Providing for Sale of $2,595,000 G. O. Bonds, Series 2010B ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2010 -78 Providing for the Sale of $9,225,000 General.Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A and Resolution 2010 -79 Providing for the Sale of $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The $9,225,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A would refund the Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 which were originally issued for the City Hall and Police Facility. In February 2010 the City Council undertook the required steps to authorize the City to issue Capital Improvement Plan Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The estimated saving by this refunding would be approximately $85,000 per year beginning in the 2011 taxes payable year. The $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B has two purposes. The first purpose is to finance $2,355,000 of the 2010 street reconstruction projects. The second purpose of the bonds is to finance $240,000 in equipment purchases levied in the 2010 budget under equipment certificates. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2010 -78 Resolution 2010 -79 Pre -Sale Report for $9,225,000 G. O. CIP Bonds, Series 2010A Pre -Sale Report for $2,595,000 G. O. Bonds, Series 2010B RESOLUTION NO. 2010-78 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF $9,225,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, SERIES 2010A A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to ;issue � the City's $9,225,000 General " Obligation Capital Improvement Plan .Bonds, Series 2010A (the "Bonds "), to refinance Housing and Redevelopment Authority's remaining Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, for interest savings; B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as- its - independent - financial - advisor - for - the - Bonds- and -is therefore authorized -to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesofa Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota: 1. Authorization, Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting, Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on October 19, 2010, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an. official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. Approved.this 21st day of September 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached'and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2010-79 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR TH&SALE OF $2,595,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2010B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $2,59500, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B (the "Bonds "), to fund equipment purchases in the City and for street reconstruction projects in the City; B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc.; in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes; Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City.of Edina, Minnesota: 1. Authorization; Fiiidines. The City Council hereby" authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals, for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening.. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on October 19, 2010, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement.' In connection with said sale, the officers or, employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. Approved this 21st day of September 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF. MINNESOTA ) COUNTY. OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk September 21, 2010 Pre -Sale Report for $912251000 G. O. CIP Bonds, Series 2010A City of Edina, Minnesota . -1K � e ISEHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Debt Issuance Services www.ehlers- inc.com Minnesota phone. 651 - 697 -8500 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Offices also In Wisconsin and Illinois fax 651- 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1122 Debt Issuance Services Details of Proposed Debt Proposed Issues: $9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A to be secured by the full faith and credit of the taxpayers of the City of Edina (the "Bonds "). Purpose: To provide funds sufficient fora refunding/refinancing of all of the HRH's outstanding Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligation), dated January 16, 2002 (the "Prior Bonds "). The Prior Bonds were issued in the amount of $12,410,000 for a new City Hall and police facility, with $8,500,000 in outstanding principal today. The Prior Bonds are not callable until February 1, 2012. The Bonds will be issued as a full net cash advance refunding, with the proceeds of the Bonds to be placed in escrow to pay all debt service on the Prior Bonds through the call date. The savings will occur with taxes payable in 2011 through 2020 of approximately $85,000 per year. Current interest rates are over 5.25% and new interest rates should be less than 2.5 %. Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 475. In early 2010, the City previously undertook the required steps to authorize a Capital Improvement Plan bond (not to exceed $9,500,000) through a public hearing and a 30 day waiting period for a reverse referendum. Funding Source: It is the intent of the City to utilize the same source of payment originally pledged to the Prior Bonds, an annual property tax levy, to make all debt service payments. Risk Factors: Due to low investment rates in the escrow fund between now and the call date in early 2012, there will be "negative arbitrage" or a lower investment yield than the yield on the new Bonds. If the City believes that interest rates will remain the same or even go up slightly in the next year, it would be better to wait until late 2011 to undertake the refunding. Arbitrage Monitoring: The City will need to monitor its debt service funds to insure compliance with IRS parameters and to avoid penalties for carrying too high of a balance during the life of the issue. Rating: The Bonds are anticipated to be rated by Moody's at an "Aaa" level and by Standard & Poor's at an "AAA" level. 4) Presale Report January 12, 2010 Page 2 Debt Issuance Services Bank Qualification: Because the City is issuing less than $30 Million in the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations. Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds. Term/Call Feature: Interest is payable each six months. Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2011 through 2022. The Bonds will be callable again on February 1, 2020. Other Considerations: We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities. Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule Pre -Sale Review by Council: Distribute Official Statement: Conference with Rating Agencies: HRA Meeting to Call Prior Bonds City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds Estimated Closing Date: September 21, 2010 October 8, 2010 Week of October 11th, 2010 October 19, 2010 October 19, 2010 November 23, 2010 Attachments Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed Wth Bond Sale Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Ehlers Contacts: Financial Advisors: Bond Analysts: Bond Sale Coordinator: Jon North Mark Ruff Diana Lockard Debbie Holmes Alicia Aulwes (651) 697 -8545 (651) 697 -8505 (651) 697 -8534 (651) 697 -8536 (651) 697 -8523 The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for review prior to the sale date. .4) Presale Report January 12, 2010 Page 3 Edina HRA MN $9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 (Proposed Net Cash Refunding of $12,410,000 ) RA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002) Table of Contents Report Sources & Uses I Prior Original Debt Service 2 Debt Service Schedule 3 Debt Service Comparison 4 Escrow Fund Cashflow 5 10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/18/2010 1 8:20 AM Leaders Ehlers Edina HRA, MN to ')')S nnn r. n Rnnds_ Series 2010 (Proposed Net Cash Refunding of $12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002) Sources & Uses Dated 111011201101 Delivered 11/01/2010 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $9,225,000.00 $9,225,000.00 Total Sources Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (0 800 %) 73,800.00 64,000.00 Costs of Issuance Deposit to Net Cash Escrow Fund 9-084-818.47 2,381.53 RoundinP Amount _ __ __ $9,225,000.00 Total Uses 10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9116/2010 1 8:20 AM Edina HRA, MN $12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Prior Original Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total 02/01/2011 600,000.00 4.600% 214,780.63 814,780.63 814,780.63 08/01/2011 - - 200,980.63 200,980.63 - 02/01/2012 630,000.00 4.800% 200,980.63 830,980.63 1,031,961.26 08/01/2012 - - 185,860.63 185,860.63 02/01/2013 660,000.00 4.900% 185 860.63 845,860.63 1,031,721_.26 08/01/2013 - - 169,690.63 169,690.63 02/01/2014 690,000.00 5.000% 169,690.63 859,690.63 1,029,381.26 08/01/2014 - - 152,440.63 152,440.63 02101/2015 725,000.00 5.000% 152,440.63 877,440.63 1,029,881.26 08/01/2015 134,315.63 134,315.63 _ 02/01/2016 760,000.00 5.125% 134,315.63 894,315.63 1,028,631.26 08/01/2016 - - 114,840.63 114,840.63 02/01/2017 800,000.00 5.125% 114,840.63 914,840.63 1,029,681.26 08/01/2017 - - 94,340.63 94,340.63 02/01/2018 840,000.00 5.125% 94 340.63 934,340.63 1,028 681.26 08/01/2018 - - 72,815.63 72,815.63 02/01/2019 885,000.00 5.125% 72,815.63 957,815.63 1,030,631.26 08/01/2019 - - 50,137.50 50,137.50 02101/2020 930,000.00 5.250% 50,137.50 980,137.50 1,030,275.00 08/01 /2020 - 25 725.00 25,725.00 02/01/2021 980,000.00 5.250% 25,725.00 1,005,725.00 1,031,450.00 Total $8,500,000.00 - $2,617,075.71 $11,117,075.71 - Yield Statistics Average Life 5.738 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 5.738 Years Average Coupon 5.3656088% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/01/2010 Refunding Delivery Date 11/01/2010 Ser 02 $12.41 M HRA Pub Pr I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/16/2010 1 8:20 AM Leaders Ehlers • Edina HRA MN $9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 (Proposed Net Cash Refunding of $12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002) Debt: Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total 11/01/2010 - - - Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.9299849% 02101/2011 780,000.00 0.400% 35;145.00 815,145.00 815,145.00 08/0112011 68;730:00 68,730A0 02/01/2012 800,000.00 0.500% 68,730.00' 868,730.00 937,460.00 08/01/2012 - - 66730.00 66730.00 - 02/61/2013 805,000.00 0.750% 66,730.00 871,730.00 938_,460.00 08/01/2013 - - 63,711.25 63,711.25 - 02/01/2014 810,000.00 1.000% 63,711.25 873,711.25 937,422.50 08/01/2014 - - 59,66125 59,661.25 - 02/01/2015 820,000.00 1 300% 59 661.25 879 661.25 939,322.50 08/01/2015 - - 54,331.25 54,331.25 02101 /2016 830,000.00 1.550% 54,331.25 884,331.25 938,662.50 08/01/2016 - - 47,898.75 47,898.75 - 02/01/2017 840,000.00 1.850% 47,898.75 887,898.75 935,797.50 08/01/2017 - 40 128.75 40 128.75 - 02/01/2018 855,000.00 2.000% 40,128.75 895,128.75 935,257.50 08/01/2018 - - 31,578.75 31,578.75 - 02/01/2019 875,000.00 2.200% 31,578.75 906,578.75 938,157.50 08/01/2019 - - 21,953.75 21,953.75 02/01/2020 895 000.00 2.350 %_._ 21,953.75 916,953.75 938,907.50 08/01/2020 - - - 11,437.50 11,437.50 - 02/01/2021 915,000.00 2.500% 11,437.50 926,437.50 937,875.00 Total $9,225,000.00 - $967,467.50 $10,192,467.50 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $49.806.25 Average Life 5.399 Years Average Coupon 1.9424620% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.0906362% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.0893729% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.9299849% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 2.2291426% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.9424620% Weighted Average Maturity 5.399 Years 10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/16/2010 1 8:20 AM Edina HRA, NIN $9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 (Proposed Net Cash Refunding of $12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002) Debt Service Comparison Date Total P +I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings Fiscal Total 11/01/2010 - (2,381.53) - 2,381.53 - 02/O1/2011 815,145.00 815,145.00 814,780.63 (364.37) 2,017.16 08/01/2011 68,730.00 68,730.00 200,980.63 132,250.63 - 02/01/2012 868,730.00 868,730.00 830,980.63 (37,749.37) 94,501.26 08/01/2012 66 730.00 66 730.00 185,860.63 119130.63 - 02/01/2013 871,730.00 871,730.00 845,860.63 (25,869.37) 93,261.26 08/01/2013 63,711.25 63,711.25 169,690.63 105,979.38 - 02/01/2014 873,711.25 873,711.25 859,690.63 (14,020.62) 91,958.76 08/01/2014 59,661.25 59,661.25 152,440.63 92,779.38 - 02/O1/2015 879,661.25 879 661.25 877 440.63 (2,220.62) 90,558.76 08/01/2015 54,331.25 54,331.25 134,315.63 79,984.38 - 02/O1/2016 884,331.25 884,331.25 894,315.63 9,984.38 89,968.76 08/01/2016 47,898.75 47,898.75 114,840.63 66,941.88 - 02/01/2017 887,898.75 887,898.75 914,840.63 26,941.88 93,883.76 08/01/2017 40128.75 40128.75 94,340.63 54,211.88 - 02/Ol/2018 895,128.75 895,128.75 934,340.63 39,211.88 93,423.76 08/01/2018 31,578.75 31,578.75 72,815.63 41,236.88 - 02/O1/2019 906,578.75 906,578.75 957,815.63 51,236.88 92,473.76 08/01/2019 21,953.75 21,953.75 50,137.50 28,183.75 - 02/01/2020 916 953.75 916 953.75 980,137.50 __.63,183.75 91,367.50 08/01/2020 11,437.50 _ 11,437.50 25,725.00 14,287.50 - 02/01/2021 926,437.50 926,437.50 1,005,725.00 79,287.50 93,575.00 Total $10,192,467.50 $10,190,085.97 $11,117,075.71 $926,989.74 - PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings 835,758.08 Net PV Cashflow Savings A 1 930 %(Bond Yield) ... 835,758.08 Contingency or Rounding Amount 2,381.53 Net Present Value Benefit $838,139.61 Net PV Benefit / $10,060,758.08 PV Refunded Debt Service 8.331% Net PV Benefit / $8,500,000 Refunded Principal 9.860% Net PV Benefit / $9,225,000 Refunding Principal 9.086% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/01/2010 Refunding Delivery Date 11/01/2010 10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/7812010 1 8:20 AM Ehlers Leaders in Public Edina HRA MN $9,225,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 (Proposed Net Cash Refunding of $12,410,000 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002) Escrow Fund Cashflow / Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV GIC or Securities] Securities Default investment yield target Bond Yield Cash Deposit Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 9,084,818.00 Total Cost of Investments $9,084,818.47 Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $8,917,782.96 Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (167,035.51) Yield to Receipt 0.3053956% Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.9299849% State and Local Govemment Series (SLGS) rates for 9/14/2010 10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 19/1612010 1 8:20 AM Cash Date Principal Rate Interest Receipts Disbursements Balance 11/01/2010 - - - 0.47 - 0.47 02/01/2011 808,227.00 0.140% 6,553.74 814,780.74 814,780.63 0.58 — 08/0172011 188 - 1'48:00 0:210% 12;832:60 200;980:60 200,980.63 0155 02101'/2012 8,088,443.00 0.310% 12,537.08 8,100,980.08 8;100,980.63 - Total $9,084,818.00 - S31,923.42 $9,116,741.89 $9,116,741.89 - / Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV GIC or Securities] Securities Default investment yield target Bond Yield Cash Deposit Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 9,084,818.00 Total Cost of Investments $9,084,818.47 Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $8,917,782.96 Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (167,035.51) Yield to Receipt 0.3053956% Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.9299849% State and Local Govemment Series (SLGS) rates for 9/14/2010 10 net cash ofSer 02 $12. 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 19/1612010 1 8:20 AM De:'bt Issuance. Services September 21, 2010 Pre-Sale'Report for $275951000, G. O. Bonds, Series 2010B City of, Edina, Minnesota EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE N I www..ehler8= inO.com MinripsotA ptioner 651-697-.8500 = 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Offices also In Wisconsin and Illinois fax .651-697-8555 Rosevilfe,' MN 55113-1122 Debt Issuance Services —0 E= Details of Proposed Debt Proposed Issues: $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010B to be secured by the full faith and credit of the taxpayers of the City of Edina (the "Bonds "). Purposes: The first purpose of the bonds is to finance $2,355,000 of street reconstruction projects associated with Pamela Park Neighborhood, Braemar Hills Neighborhood, Bror Road, Moccasin Valley, Interlachen. Circle Neighborhood, Interlachen Bluff Neighborhood, and Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood. The financing has assumed that 100% of project costs will be assessed to property owners and 22% of the assessment amount will be prepaid. The second purpose of the Bonds is to finance $240,000 in equipment purchases payable over slightly more than two years. Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 475, Chapter 429 and Chapter 412. Funding Source: The City will use special assessments to pay the street reconstruction portion of the debt and a tax levy to pay for the equipment: • The assessments are not expected to be levied until the fall of 2011 for taxes payable in 2012, with $65,000 capitalized interest to bridge the first debt service payments. • The taxes payable 2010 levy contained a debt service component for the equipment portion of the Bonds. Similar levies of $80,000 for taxes payable in 2011 and 2012 will be required for debt service. Risk Factors: If assessments are pre -paid in the year 2013 through 2017, the City will not immediately be able to pre -pay the Bonds. Therefore, there is a risk of a City subsidy for the street projects because the interest earnings on the debt service funds may be less than the interest rate on the Bonds. A higher interest rate on the assessments and a 105% levy requirement helps mitigate this risk. Arbitrage Monitoring: The City will need to monitor its debt service funds to insure compliance with IRS parameters and to avoid penalties for carrying too high of a balance during the life of the issue. Rating: The Bonds are anticipated to be rated by Moody's at an "Aaa" level and by Standard & Poor's at an "AAA" level. Presale Report City of Edina 2010 Debt Issues Page 2 Debt Issuance Services Bank Qualification: Because the City is issuing less than $30 Million in the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations. Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds. Term /Call Feature: Interest is payable each six months beginning February 1, 2011. Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2011 through 2022. The Bonds will be callable on February 1, 2018 for principal payable in 2019 through 2022. Other Considerations: We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities. Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule Pre -Sale Review by Council: Distribute Official Statement: Conference with Rating Agencies: City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds: Estimated Closing Date: Attachments September 21, 2010 October 8, 2010 Week of October 11th, 2010 October 19, 2010 November 23, 2010 Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed Wth Bond Sale Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Ehlers Contacts: Financial Advisors: Jon North (651) 697 -8545 Mark Ruff (651) 697 -8505 Bond Analysts: Diana Lockard (651) 697 -8534 Debbie Holmes (651) 697 -8536 Bond Sale Coordinator: Alicia Aulwes (651) 697 -8523 The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for review prior to the sale date. Presale Report City of Edina 2010 Debt Issues Page 3 City of Edina, MN X2.595.000 G.O. Bonds. Series 2010 Issue Summary Table of Contents Report ISSUE SUMMARY Total Issue Sources And Uses I Debt Service Schedule 2 Net Debt Service Schedule 3 PIR BONDS Net Debt Service Schedule 4 EQUIP CERTS Net Debt Service Schedule 5 Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9115/2010 1 8:17 AM City of Edina, MN $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 Issue Summary Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 10/1S12010 1 Delivered 10115/2010 PIR Bonds Equip Certs Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $2,355,000.00 $240,000.00 $2,595,000.00 Prepaid Special Assessments 630 250.00 630,250.00 Total Sources $2,995,250.00 5240,000.00 $3,225,250.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000 %) 23,550.00 2,400.00 25,950.00 Costs of Issuance 31 763.01 3,236.99 35,000.00 Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 65 479.47 - 65,479.47 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 2,866,000.00 230,000.00 3,096,000.00 Rounding Amount (1,542.48) 4,363.01 2,820.53 Total Uses $2,985,250.00 $240,000.00 $3,2259250.00 Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9/152010 8:17 AM Leaders Ehlers M1 - City of Edina, MN $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 Issue Summary Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total 10/15/2010 - - - - 02/01/2011 80,000.00 0.700% 15,530.47 95,530.47 95,530.47 08/01/2011 - - 26,092.50 26,092.50 - 02/01/2012 80,000.00 0.950% 26,092.50 106,092.50 132,185.00 08/01/2012 25 712.50 25 712.50 - 02/01/2013 300,000.00 1.050010 25,712.50 325,712.50 351,425.00 08/01/2013 - - 24,137.50 24,137.50 - 02/01/2014 220,000.00 1.300% 24,137.50 244,137.50 268,275.00 08/01/2014 - - 22,707.50 22,707.50 - 02/01/2015 225,000.00 1.600% 22 707.50 247,707.50 270,415.00 08/01/2015 - - 20,907.50 20,907.50 - 02/01/2016 225,000.00 1.850% 20,907.50 245,907.50 266,815.00 08/01/2016 - - 18,826.25 18,826.25 - 02/01/2017 230,000.00 2.1500/6 18,826.25 248,826.25 267,652.50 08/01/2017 - 16 353.75 16 353.75 - 02/01/2018 235,000.00 2.300% 16,353.75 251,353.75 267,707.50 08/01/2018 - - 13,651.25 13,651.25 - 02/01/2019 240,000.00 2.500% 13,651.25 253,651.25 267,302.50 08/01/2019 - - 10,651.25 10,651.25 - 02/01/2020 245,000.00 2.650% 10 651.25 2.55 651.25 266,302.50 08/01/2020 - - 7,405.00 7,405.00 - 02/01/2021 255,000.00 2.800% 7,405.00 262,405.00 269,810.00 08/01/2021 - - 3,835.00 3,835.00 - 02/01/2022 260,000.00 2.950% 3,835.00 263,835.00 267,670.00 Total $2,595,000.00 - $396,090.47 $2,991,090.47 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $16,689.08 Average Life 6.431 Years Average Coupon 2.3733507% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.5288415% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.5283242% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.3568306% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 2.7634511% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.3733507% Weighted Average Maturity 6.431 Years Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary I 9/152010 1 8:17 AM City of Edina, MN $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010 Issue Summary Net Debt Service Schedule Total $2,595,000.00 - $396,090.47 $2,991,090.47 (65,479.47) $2,925,611.00 - Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I CIF Net New D/S Total 10/15/2010 - - - - - - - 02/01/2011 80,000.00 0.700% 15,530.47 95,530.47 (14,894.47) 80,636.00 80,636.00 08101/2011 - - 26,092.50 26,092.50 (25,292.50) 800.00 - 02/01/2012 80,000.00 0.950% 26,092.50 106,092.50 (25,292.50) 80,800.00 81,600.00 08/01/2012 25,712.50 25,712.50 25,712.50 - 02/01/2013 300,000.00 1.050% 25,712.50 325,712.50 325,712.50 351,425.00 08/01/2013 - - 24,137.50 24,137.50 24,137.50 - 02/01/2014 220,000.00 1.300% 24,137.50 244,137.50 - 244,137.50 268,275.00 08/01/2014 - - 22,707.50 22,707.50 - 22,707.50 - 02/01/2015 225 000.00 1.600% 22 707.50 247 707.50 247 707.50 270 415.00 08/01/2015 - - 20,907.50 20,907.50 20,907.50 - 02/01/2016 225,000.00 1.850% 20,907.50 245,907.50 - 245,907.50 266,815.00 08/01/2016 - - 18,826.25 18,826.25 18,826.25 - 02/01/2017 230,000.00 2.150% 18,826.25 248,826.25 248,826.25 267,652.50 08/01/2017 16,353.75 16,353.75 16,353.75 - 02/01/2018 235,000.00 2.300% 16,353.75 251,353.75 251,353.75 267,707.50 08/01/2018 - - 13,651.25 13,651.25 13,651.25 - 02/01/2019 240,000.00 2.500% 13,651.25 253,651.25 253,651.25 267,302.50 08/01/2019 - - 10,651.25 10,651.25 - 10,651.25 - 02/01/2020 245 000.00 2.650% 10 651.25 255 651.25 255 651.25 266 302.50 08/01/2020 - - 7,405.00 7,405.00 - 7,405.00 - 02/01/2021 255,000.00 2.800% 7,405.00 262,405.00 - 262,405.00 269,810.00 08/01/2021 - - 3,835.00 3,835.00 - 3,835.00 - 02/01/2022 260,000.00 2.950% 3,835.00 263,835.00 - 263,835.00 267,670.00 Total $2,595,000.00 - $396,090.47 $2,991,090.47 (65,479.47) $2,925,611.00 - Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Issue Summary 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM Edina HRA, MN $2,355,000 - Purpose One G.O. PIR Bonds Net Debt Service Schedule Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I CIF Net New D/S Total 10/15/2010 4 - - - - - - 02/01/2011 14,894.47 14,894.47 (14,894.47) - - - 08/01/2011 - - 25,292.50 25;292:50 (25;292:50) - -- 02/01/2012 - - 25,292.50 M- 25,292.50 (25,292.50) - - 08/01/2012 25.292 50 25 292.50 - 25,292.50 - 02/01/2013 220,000.00 1.050% 25,292.50 245,292.50 - 245,292.50 270,585.00 08101/2013 - - 24,137.50 24,137.50 - 24;137.50 - 02/01/2014 220,000.00 1.300% 24,137.50 244,137.50 - 244,137.50 268,275.00 08/01/2014 - - 22,707.50 22,707.50 - 22,707.50 - 02/01 /2015 225,000.00 1.600% 22,70750 247 707.50 - 247,707.50 270,415.00 08/01/2015 - - 20,907.50 20,907.50 - 20,907.50 - 02/01/2016 225,000.00 1.850% 20,907.50 245,907.50 - 245,907.50 266,815.00 08/01/2016 - - 18,826.25 18,826.25 - 18,826.25 - 02/01/2017 230,000.00 2.150% 18,826.25 248,826.25 - 248,826.25 267,652.50 08/01/2017 16 353.75 16 353.75 - 16,353.75 - 02/01/2018 235,000.00 2.300% 16,353.75 251,353.75 - 251,353.75 267,707.50 08/01/2018 - - 13,651.25 13,651.25 - 13,651.25 - 02/01/2019 240,000.00 2.500% 13,651.25 253,651.25 - 253,651.25 267,302.50 08/01/2019 - - 10,651.25 10,651.25 - 10,651.25 - 02/01/2020 245,000.00 2.6506/. 10,651.25 255,651.25 - 255,651.25 ••• 266,302.50_ 08/01/2020 - - 7,405.00 7,405.00 - 7,405.00 - 02/01/2021 255,000.00 2.800% 7,405.00 262,405.00 - 262,405.00 269,810.00 08101/2021 - - 3,835.00 3,835.00 - 3,835.00 - 02/01/2022 260,000.00 2.950% 3,835.00 263,835.00 - 263,835.00 267,670.00 Total $2,355,000.00 - $393,014.47 52,748,014.47 (65,479.47) $2,682,535.00 - Ser 2010 Go Bonds Issue S I PIR Bonds 1 9/15(2010 1 8:17 AM Edina HRA, MN $240,000 - Purpose Two G.O. Equipment Certificates Net Debt Service Schedule Total $240,000.00 - S3,076.00 $243,076.00 $243,076.00 - Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Equip Certs 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM Net New Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I D/S Total 10/15/2010 - - - - - 02/01/2011 80,000.00 0.700% 636.00 80,636.00 80,636.00 80,636.00 08/01/2011 - - 800.00 800.00 800.00 - 02/01/2012 80,000.00 0.950% 800.00 80,800.00 80,800.00 81,600.00 08/01/2012 420.00 420.00 420.00 - 02/01/2013 80,000.00 1.050% 420.00 80,420.00 80,420.00 80,840.00 Total $240,000.00 - S3,076.00 $243,076.00 $243,076.00 - Ser 2010 GO Bonds Issue S I Equip Certs 1 9/15/2010 1 8:17 AM /1N,r o \NOORPOPA9 • Moa REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item. Item No. IV. B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk 1'7 Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: September 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -77 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -77 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-77 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Don & Gini Washburn $100.00 Heath Randall King $100.00 Mark & Ruth Valgamae $100.00 Edina Communications Department: Edina Community Foundation $143.33 Edina Police Department: Matt Backmeier State Farm $900.00 Dated: September 21, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Jennifer Bennerotte $10.00 Sandra Phillips $50.00 Jean Schlemmer $100.00 DVD Recorder Traffic Safety T -shirts James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 o e 0 . ,� 0 ,aaa REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV. C. From: Roger N. Knutson City Attorney ® Action Discussion Information Date: September 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution Designating City Manager on an Interim Basis ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -80. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Heather Worthington's last day as Interim City Manager is October 6, 2010. Because the new City Manager, Scott Neal will not begin his employment until November 8, 2010, an interim City Manager should be designated. Only the City Manager is authorized by law to perform certain tasks and sign certain documents. The appointment will avoid any uncertainty about the authority of an Interim City Manager when the City Manager's position is vacant. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -80 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-80 RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY MANAGER ON AN INTERIM BASIS RECITALS City of Edina A. The interim City Manager, Heather Worthington, has submitted her resignation effective October 6, 2010. B. The City has appointed Scott Neal as City Manager effective November 8, 2010 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Effective October 6, 2010 Ceil Smith is appointed City Manager on an interim basis until November 8, 2010. 2. This appointment shall carry with it the duties and responsibilities associated with the office of City Manager, and Ceil Smith shall be listed as a signatory on all city accounts. Attest: ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 21st day of September 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 cif w9S-OA, oe H ,aas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.D From: Boyd Tate „- Traffic Safety Coordinat r ® Action F] Discussion Information Date: September 21, 2010 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, September 1, 2010. BACKGROUND: Staff will be presenting Section Al and B2, all other items could be passed in one motion. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Review for September 1, 2010. It TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, September 1, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on September 1, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator and Sign Coordinator. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the September 21, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: 1. The Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy has been revised to bring the City's Policy in concurrence with the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD). The updated policy is attached to this report. The only significant changes to the policy have occurred in item 4.C.1 and 4.D. In 4.C.1 the minimum total vehicle volume has been reduced from 500 vehicles per hour to 300 vehicles per hour. Item 4.1) has been added as additional criteria. 2. Request to put "No Parking Anytime" signs at the end of the cul -de -sac located at Benton Avenue and Stuart Avenue. This request comes from staff. The roadway in question is located on the north west side of Country Side Elementary School and is currently marked "No Parking — Fire Lane ". Staff wants to post "No Parking" signs to prevent employees and visitors of the school from parking here. The area posted would be deep within the cul -de- sac so residents could continue to park on the street. Staff recommends approval of the request to post the Benton Avenue /Stuart Avenue cul -de -sac "No ParkinE ". Traffic Safety Staff Review September 1, 2010 Page 1 of 4 3. Request to change all of the "90- minute" parking signs to "2- hour" parking in all three of the parking ramps at 50`h & France Ave. This request comes from the 50`h & France Business & Professional Association who want to give customers more time to park while using the businesses in this area. The association feels that 2 -Hour parking would allow customers to dine or see a movie and not be in violation of the current restrictions. The City of Edina would be reimbursed by the association for time and materials. the reauest to chanize the restrictions in all three ramps at 50`" & France Avenue from "90- Minutes" to "2- Hour" parking. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: Request to put a "Yield" sign at 74`h Street (south le at at Xerxes Avenue for east bound 74`h Street traffic, and a "Stop" sign at 75`. Street for south bound Xerxes Avenue traffic. Both locations are on the Edina side of Xerxes Avenue. This request comes from the City of Richfield. (See attached map). The City of Richfield has adopted a new residential stop sign policy and is making this request to bring this section of Xerxes Avenue into compliance with that policy. This section of Xerxes Avenue has a Monday- Friday average daily traffic count of 167 vehicles with an 85`"- percentile speed of 31.9 mph. This is far below the minimum vehicles required by warrants. Staff recommends that we stay within our written guidelines in order to maintain a fair and consistent application of this policy. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a Yield sign at 74`h Street. and a Stop sign at 75`h Street on Xerxes Avenue for lack of warrants. 2. Request for an "All Way Stop at W. 58`h Street and Xerxes Avenue. This request was first reviewed by staff at the May 5, 2010 meeting and brought to Council on May 18, 2010. Since that time Staff has completed additional review at the request of the Council. Please see the attached Engineering Department Memo dated September 17, 2010 for the full report and recommendation. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 4 September 1, 2010 SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request to change the location of the "No Left Turn 3:10 — 3:40 PM School Days" sign for west bound Valley View Road traffic at Chapel Lane (adjacent to Edina High School) to make it more visible to motorists. Refer to Engineering Department. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled from July 20, 2010 to August 15, 2010. 1. A total of fifty -one calls were received from residents with questions regarding various traffic safety issues. Many of the questions were related to the start of school. 2. A resident of Cornelia Place called to complain that ambulances and Metro Mobility vehicles were parking in the no parking zone of the new medical building on W. 65th Street between France Ave and Valley View Road. The no parking signs were taken down during the construction of this building. They are now back up and the area is clearly posted. 3. Request that the in -street pedestrian sign located on W. 66d' Street and West Shore Drive be left up all year and not just during summer months. 4. Angry resident wanted to know why we lowered the speed limit on W. 66th Street between Valley View Road and Highway 100. He felt the limit should have been increased to 40 mph. This was a very lengthy phone call. 5. A resident called and was very upset because she got a ticket for making a right turn on red during the restricted hours at 50`" Street and Grange Road. She wanted to know when this turn restriction was first put up. Research showed that the "No Right Turn on Red" was posted on September 10, 1985. 6. Two calls from realtors wanting to know traffic counts in the Morningside and Country club neighborhoods. 7. Complaint from resident on Woodland Circle about construction parking and noise. 8. Call from a resident on the Edina side of Xerxes Avenue who was opposed to the Richfield request that we place a stop sign at 75th Street for south bound Xerxes Ave traffic. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 4 September 1, 2010 9. Clear view complaint on Blake Road and the south leg of Interlachen Boulevard. Ref. to Sgt. P. Larsen. 10. Complaint that the stop signs at 70th & Cahill Road and 70th & Tracy Avenue were partially blocked by tree limbs. Ref. to Sgt. P. Larsen. 11. Call from a resident of Edina West Condos (Lincoln Drive) wanting to know why the City of Edina put speed bumps on their street. This is a private drive and the speed bumps were put in by the condo association. 12. Complaint about all of the extra traffic generated by the new medical building on W. 65th Street (France Avenue to Valley View Road). This is from a resident of Cornelia Place who is upset that people are driving through their front lot 13. Complaint about the street condition of Prescott Circle. Ref. to Street Department. Pot holes were filled in. 14. Call from a resident who stated cars were ignoring the stop sign on Maloney Avenue at Arthur Street. Ref. to EPD. 15. Two residents on Country Club Road called to complain that cars were parking to close the alley. This will be discussed at the next traffic safety meeting. 16. Received a call from an employee at the office building at 8000 West 78th Street stating it is nearly impossible to make a left turn from the parking lot onto West 78th Street during peak afternoon hours. This is a Bloomington address and the caller was referred to the City of Bloomington. 17. Call from a resident near Cornelia School stating that Edina needs more stop signs in all residential areas. 18. Complaint from a resident stating that the entrance to Southdale Mall off of France Avenue should be better marked. Ref. to Hennepin County. 19. Call from a resident on Ivy Way stating someone had taken down the street name sign. Ref. to sign shop. ATTACHMENTS • Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy • Engineering Department Memo dated September 17, 2010 for 58th Street and Chowen Avenue • Proposed Signage at Xerxes Avenue and 74th/75th Street Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 4 September 1, 2010 e MULTIWAY STOP SIGNS STOP N�� .�y TRAFFIC POLICY Apo Revised September 1, 2010 City of Edina PURPOSE: The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs. Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or- similar request is at the discretion of the City Council. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will remain unchanged. G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure\Streets\Trafflc\policies\jnulti way stop.docx MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY (CONTINUED) 4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign installation: a. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. b. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined. vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but 3. If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. d. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. 5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \policies\multi way stop.docx o @ o V .ay MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: September 17, 2010 TO: Traffic Safety Committee FROM: Jack Sullivan 9 JP SUBJECT: 58th Street and Chowen Avenue - Traffic Report PURPOSE: To review the regulatory and cautionary signage of 58t" Street east of France Avenue for concurrence with current City Traffic Policies as directed by the City Council. BACKGROUND: Two residents of Chowen Avenue requested an all -way stop intersection at 581h Street and Chowen Avenue. The residents became concerned when an off leash dog was hit at the intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue. They are also concerned with the .safety of children in the neighborhood as well as the speed of the traffic on 58th Street. The request was-forwarded to the Traffic Advisory Committee (TSC) for review at the May 5, 2010 meeting. The TSC denied the request for a stop sign because the intersection does not meet the criteria of the City's. Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy (Attachment A). The TSC report was brought to Council on May 18, 2010. Council directed staff to review the regulatory and cautionary signage of 58th Street east of France Avenue (Attachment B). PROCEDURE: Analyze the traffic volume and speeds of 58th Street east of France Avenue for consideration of traffic control signage. The criteria outlined in the City of Edina Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy (Attachment H), updated to reflect 2005 Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD), was used to determine if the intersection warrants multiway traffic control. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 1 of 12 r STAFF SUMMARY: Engineering and Public Safety Staff do not believe there is a speed or traffic safety issue along 58th Street and the following supporting data illustrates that the intersection at 58th Street and Chowen Avenue does not warrant a Multiway Stop Sign per the City of Edina Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy and the MN MUTCD. Staff cannot support modifications to the traffic control at this intersection and is recommending denial of the multiway stop sign request. DATA COLLECTION: Data collection for this area included roadway geometrics, speed, volume, accident records and sight obstructions. Road Geometrics and Signage 58th Street is a designated Municipal State Aid (MSAS) street with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. The road has no horizontal curvature and gentle vertical curves along the corridor. The road is paved with a blacktop surface and is approximately 29 feet wide with no curb and gutter. Parking is allowed on both sides and it is striped with, a single skip yellow centerline marking. The paint striping on 58th Street changes to a double yellow 120 feet either side of Beard Avenue. The intersecting streets of Ewing Avenue, Drew Avenue, Chowen Avenue, Beard Avenue, Abbott Avenue, Zenith Avenue, and York. Avenue are approximately 30 feet wide with on street parking. The side streets are posted as 30 mph and are controlled with side street stop sign with the exception of .Beard Avenue. Beard Avenue is the only all -way stop intersection along the corridor. There is no recorded rationale or revisions to the street signage of 58th Street since the roadway was constructed in the late 1940's. It is assumed that the all -way stop at 58th Street and Beard Avenue was placed due to Beard Avenue being the half -way point between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and is located at the bottom of a hill. Similarly 60 Street has the only all -way stop located at Chowen Avenue, at a similar low point of the roadway. There. are no sidewalks located along any of the streets, however a state aid funded sidewalk is proposed in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update for 58th Street (Attachment C). G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 2 of 12 U Chowen Park is located approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue. The park is situated in the southwest corner of 57th Street and Chowen Avenue at an all —way stop intersection. Speed and Volumes Eight traffic counters were placed near the intersection of 58th and Chowen Avenue. The counters were placed around midday Tuesday, May 25, 2010 and picked up on Friday, June 4, 2010. The counters were in place for nine full days and two half days. The counters record the number of vehicles, type of vehicle, bicycles, speed, direction and time of day. Average traffic volumes and speeds are shown on the Traffic Counter Location (Attachment D) The Memorial Day weekend was included in the data collection, however only Tuesday, June 1, 2010 to Thursday, June 3, 2010 was used for average daily traffic counts. 58th Street has an average of 1,905 vehicles near Chowen Avenue. Beard Avenue and Chowen Avenue have approximately 300 vehicles per day per roadway. Speed data and the 85 percentile speed were taken as an average of the eleven days. The 85 percentile speed is the speed at which 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling. The 85 percentile speed for 58th Street is between 30 and 32 mph, the speed for Beard Avenue is between 27 and 29 mph and Chowen Avenue is between 25 to 29 mph. Bicycle counts were also obtained as part of the traffic data collection by using the same traffic counters. Bicycle volumes on 58th Street averaged 0.5 bicycles per day, 2 bicycles per day on Beard Avenue and 2 bicycles per day on Chowen Avenue. Pedestrian volumes were not counted as part of this study. Counts of this type are extremely labor intensive, requiring human field observation for long periods of time. In addition, the_, volatility of weather and other factors greatly affect the pedestrian movements in a non - commercial area such as this. Accident History Accident data from 2001 to 2008 was derived from the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation crash history database. As shown in Figure No. 1 there has been no reported incidents of vehicle or property damage crashes along 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. Accident data from 2008 to the present was supplied by the. City of Edina Police Department. From January 2009 to June 30, 2010, there have been 50 police responses associated with this corridor exclusive of the France Avenue and the Xerxes Avenue intersections. Only one call was related to a property damage crash, all others G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen\ 58th_Chowen_Traffic_Re port. docx Page 3 of 12 n were not traffic related. The property damage crash was on April 7, 2010, when an off leash dog was struck and killed by a drive -off motorist on 58th Street at the intersection of Chowen Avenue. Figure No. 1 - Traffic History on 58t.' and 60th Street: 2001 to 2008 Sight Obstructions 58th Street has no horizontal curvature with most of the trees and other landscape vegetation set back off the road; therefore, no horizontal sight obstruction issue exist and is compliant with City Code 1405 "Clear View Zone ". The vertical profile of the road can be seen in the attached profile graphic (Attachment E). The' intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located near the crest (top) of a vertical .curve; however, the area affords sufficient sight distances such that no sight obstructions exist. The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located at the bottom of a sag (bottom) vertical curve which has no sight distance issues. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.doac Page 4 of 12 1 i �t W eem Grimes W u e ¢ a m w 3 W 59th St II O ¢ Y N a W 60th St t Figure No. 1 - Traffic History on 58t.' and 60th Street: 2001 to 2008 Sight Obstructions 58th Street has no horizontal curvature with most of the trees and other landscape vegetation set back off the road; therefore, no horizontal sight obstruction issue exist and is compliant with City Code 1405 "Clear View Zone ". The vertical profile of the road can be seen in the attached profile graphic (Attachment E). The' intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located near the crest (top) of a vertical .curve; however, the area affords sufficient sight distances such that no sight obstructions exist. The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue is located at the bottom of a sag (bottom) vertical curve which has no sight distance issues. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.doac Page 4 of 12 1 Police Speed Trailer The police department's speed radar trailer has been on -site during the months of April and May to give drivers instantaneous speed feedback. COMPARISON OF MULTIWAY STOP SIGN CRITERIA TO DATA COLLECTED: The data collected and evaluated in the above sections of this report is compared against the City's Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy for the intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue. The Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy, in underlined italics, is followed by Staff's engineering evaluation. MULTIWAY STOP SIGN TRAFFIC POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed The language of the City of Edina Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy conforms to the MN MUTCD, 2005 edition. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. Refer to the "Data Collection" section above for an overview of criteria reviewed. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will remain unchanged. Engineering data does not clearly indicate the need for a multiway stop sign at this intersection. 4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign installation: a. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue does not meet the 8 signal warrants as outlined in Chapter 4C of the MN MUTCD; therefore this intersection does not meet this requirement. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 5 of 12 b. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left -tum collisions as well as right -angle collisions. There has only been one reported accident at this intersection since 2001. This accident was between a vehicle and an unleashed dog. Therefore, there is not a crash problem at this intersection and does not meet crash requirements. c. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and In order to determine the volume of vehicles entering the intersection of 58th Street and Chowen Avenue traffic count data was looked at to determine the largest volume day and location. The largest volume day was June 3, 2010 for this intersection (Figure No. 1) on the next page. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\ 58th_ Chowen\ 58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 6 of 12 58th Street and Chowen Avenue 8 Hour Average (June 3, 2010 Data Set) 58th Street (Major Street) Chowen Avenue (Minor Street) West Bound' East Bound' Vehicle Volume South Bound North Bound Vehicle Volume 12:00 AM 4 2 6 0 1 1 1:00 AM 3 4 7 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 4:00 AM 0 2 2 0 1 1 5:00 AM 1 6 7 0 2 2 6:00 AM 9 23 32 2 6 8 *7:00 AM 63 103 166 28 13 41 *8:00 AM 66 99 165 14 10 24 9:00 AM 53 47 100 7 9 16 10:00 AM 48 26 74 6 6 12 11:00 AM 64 37 101 5 15 20 *12:00 PM 68 42 110 8 9 17 1:00 PM 60 34 94 6 10 16 2:00 PM 52 47 99 12 19 31 *3:00 PM 122 61 183 16 21 37 *4:00 PM 146 69 215 12 18 30 *5:00 PM 160 80 240 12 13 25 *6:00 PM 94 74 168 9 10 19 *7:00 PM 71 33 104 3 5 8 8:00 PM 66 30 96 6 5 11 9:00 PM 31 18 49 3 4 7 10:00 PM 16 8 24 2 1 3 11:00 PM 8 5 1 13 0 01 0 Total Volume: 1205 851 2056 151 179 330 * 8 Hour Average (June 3, 2010 Data Set): 168.9 25.1 1 Traffic Counts for West Bound and East Bound used Station B 2 Traffic Counts for South Bound used Station C 3 Traffic Counts for North Bound used Station D Figure No. 2 — 8 Hour Traffic Volume at 580 St. and Chowen Ave. As shown in the above figure, the major street (58th Street) combined approaches average around 169 vehicles per hour for any eight hours, well below the 300 required. Therefore, the intersection does not meet the major street volume requirements. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 7 of 12 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection: from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200. units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but The minor street (Chowen Avenue) averages around 25 vehicles per hour the same eight hours. As previously indicated, there are only 2 bicycles per day at this location and pedestrians were not counted. It can be assumed that there are not 173 pedestrians crossing at . this location per hour for the same eight hours. Therefore, this intersection does not meet the combined vehicle requirements. 3. If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. The 85th- percentile speed for the major street (58th Street) is 30 mph. Therefore, the intersection does not meet the speed requirements. d. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria 8, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Criteria B — 5 Crashes in a 12 month period: Since there is only one crash along the corridor in the last 9 years; therefore, the 80 percent reduction criteria is not met. Criteria C.1 — Total vehicles on major streets: 80% of 300 vehicles per day is 240. The. average at this location is only 169 vehicles per hour; therefore, the total vehicle requirement is not met. Criteria C.2. — Combined vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles on minor street: 80% of 200 is 160.. The average daily vehicle traffic at this location is only 25 per hour and bicycle and pedestrian counts are extremely low. Therefore, the intersection does not meet the combined criteria. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 8 of 12 5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. Speeds on both 58th Street (30.0 mph) and Chowen Avenue (25.7mph) are both within the posted speed limit of 30 mph. 6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. Traffic volumes for 58th Street are approximately 1,905 vehicles per day and volumes on Chowen are approximately 300 vehicles per day. The recorded volumes are consistent with other similar streets within Edina. The intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue was also evaluated and can be found in Table No. 1 and the "8 Hour Average" data set (Attachment G) Table No. 1 — Multiway Stop Sian Criteria Matrix The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen and the intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue do not meet the criteria set forth in the Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy. However, staff believes that the existing location of the all way stop should remain at the intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 9 of 12 Edina Multiway 58th Street and Beard 58th Street and Chowen Stop Sign and MN Avenue Intersection Avenue Intersection Data Yes /No Data Yes /No Criteria MUTCD Criteria 4a. Are signals If signals are warranted? warranted then N/A No N/A No install temp. signs 4b. Crash Problem 5-or more crashes in no 1 crash in a 12 -month period crashes in No No g years 9 years 4c.1. Minimum Traffic 300 vehicles on 77 No 169 No Volumes major leg in 8 hours 4c.2. Combined 200 vehicles, peds vehicular /pedestrian and bikes on minor 27 No 27 No street 4c.3. 85% approaching 85% speed exceeds 31.2 mph No 30 mph No speed 40 mph 4d. 80% of minimum 80% rule of 4b, 4c.1 see data see data values and 4c.d above No . above No Table No. 1 — Multiway Stop Sian Criteria Matrix The intersection of 58th Street and Chowen and the intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue do not meet the criteria set forth in the Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy. However, staff believes that the existing location of the all way stop should remain at the intersection of 58th Street and Beard Avenue. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 9 of 12 OTHER TRAFFIC MANANGEMENT OPTIONS: Pedestrian Crossinas The intersection of 58th and Chowen and 58th and Beard do not meet the criteria of the Pedestrian Crosswalks Traffic Policy (Attachment 1). The pedestrian count would have to be 20 per hour for two hours in order to meet the policy. Due to the geometrics of the neighborhood staff believes that the number of pedestrians do not exist. Additionally, by State Statute 169.21 subd.2, a driver of a motor vehicle must yield the right of way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway regardless if a crosswalk is marked. Staff also looked at other traffic control devices at the request of residents. A request was made for an overhead pedestrian signal commonly referred to as the "HAWK" (Figure No. 3). These devices act more like a traffic signal than a pedestrian flashing crossing. The cost for installation of such a system starts at $100,000. More importantly, the warrants required for installation are just as restrictive as a traditional traffic signal. By inspection, this intersection would not meet the required warrants. Fiaure No. 3 — HAWK Pedestrian Crossin G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 10 of 12 Sidewalks The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 58th Street is just over 1,900 vehicles per day. Engineering staff recommends separating pedestrians and vehicles whenever traffic exceeds 750 vehicles per day. Based on the ADT of 58th Street Staff believes sidewalks are necessary. 58th Street is tentatively scheduled for reconstruction in 2014. Bike Lanes 58th Street is shown as a primary bike route in the City of Edina Compressive Bicycle Transportation Plan and the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (Attachment 1). It is possible to install bike lanes in both directions along 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue if parking is removed from the street. The cross section of the road would be a 3.5' bike lane, two 11 foot drive lanes and 3.5' bike lane. The designated bike lanes would allow the City to reduce the speed limit to 25 mph per state statute. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending denial of the Multiway Stop Sign request at the intersection of 58th Street and Chowen as it does not meet the criteria of the City of Edina Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy and that all other regulatory and cautionary signage remain as -is along 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. However, Staff recommends a short term solution of striping bike lanes along 58th Street. This solution would remove parking along 58th Street, narrow up the traffic lanes and reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians. Staff does not recommend painted or signed crosswalks since the street does not meet the criteria of the Pedestrian Crosswalks Traffic Policy. A longer term solution when 58th street is scheduled for reconstruction is to add curb and gutter and sidewalk to one side of the roadway. The bike lanes, 25 mph speed limit and no parking from the short term solution would remain. If Council adopts the short term solution, staff will return with resolutions for no parking along 58th Street and signage of the 25 mph speed limit. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies \58th_Chowen \58th_Chowen Traffic_Report.docx Page 11 of 12 Attachments: Attachment A — Traffic Safety Staff Review (May 5, 2010) Attachment B — Edina City Council Meeting Minutes (May 18, 2010) Attachment C — 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk Facilities Fig. 7.10 Attachment D - Traffic Counter Location Map Attachment E — Intersection Control of 58th & 60th Street with profile information Attachment F — 8 hour Traffic Volumes at 58th Street and Beard Avenue Attachment G — Multiway Stop Sign Traffic Policy Attachment H — Pedestrian Crosswalk Traffic Policy Attachment I - 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Bicycle Facilities Fig. 7.11 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Studies\ 58th_ Chowen \58th_Chowen_Traffic_Report.docx Page 12 of 12 ATTACHMENT A TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, May 5, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 5, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 18, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A• Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: Request for three parking stalls to be designated as "15- minute Loading / Unloading" in the middle ramp located at 3925 West 49%2 Street at 50th & France. The 50`h & France Business Association is requesting that three "15- minute Loading / Unloading" stalls be installed in the middle ramp 3925 West 49%2 Street, for use by customers and employees at the 50th and France Business Area. There are currently two parking stalls designated as "15- minute parking" at the easterly end of the first level of this ramp. These two signs would be converted to "15- minute Loading / Unloading — Employee Permit Allowed." A third sign would be installed next to the middle first level stairway, which will give direct access to most of the stores and also will create more room for pedestrians during most of the day. Signs entering the ramp would be changed to read "Employee Parking Allowed in Designated Spaces Only." Staff recommends that three parking stalls to be designated as "15- minute Loading / Unloading" in the middle ramp located at 3925 West 49% Street at 50th & France. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 5, 2010 Page 1 of 6 G:\Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 05- 05- 10.doc ATTACHMENT A 2. Request from a resident to put up advisory signs urging pedestrians to cross the street only in the designated crosswalks provided along West 49'/2 Street between France Avenue and West 50th Street. SECTION B: This request comes from a citizen who almost hit a pedestrian in this area. He stated that the pedestrian was not in a designated crosswalk and stepped right in front of his vehicle. Edina's pedestrian crosswalk traffic policy states that "Pedestrians must obey signals and yield to motorists if not crossing at an intersection or a crosswalk." West 49%2 Street, west of France Avenue, turns into Halifax Avenue just north of West 50th Street. There are currently five (5), designated pedestrian crosswalks on this short roadway. Three of these crosswalks are mid -block and two of the five have in- street pedestrian crossing signs. This area has high pedestrian volumes at all times of the day. Avenue, north of West 50th Street, has an average daily tI� Halifax traffic count of 7,429 vehicles with an 85 - percentile speed of 21.9 mph. There have been several vehicle accidents reported in the past five years but no pedestrian accidents. The requestor feels that it is just a matter of time before a pedestrian gets hit. Staff feels that pedestrian advisory signs would increase public safety and awareness if placed at the ramp exits as well as the entrances and exits of area businesses. These advisory signs would advise /urge all pedestrians to use the crosswalks provided and be worded accordingly. Staff recommends the installation of pedestrian advisory signs along West-491/7 Street west of France Avenue and on Halifax Avenue north of West 50 "' Street at the entrances /exit; as at various other locations in the area. Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: Request for a stop sign on Lexington Street at Concord Avenue that would stop east/west bound Lexington Street traffic. The requestor is a resident on Concord Avenue who is concerned with the safety of the children on the block. Requestor states that cars frequently speed around the corner of Lexington Street onto Concord Avenue and believes that a stop sign would solve this problem. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 5, 2010 Page 2 of 6 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 05- 05- 10.doc ATTACHMENT A Concord Avenue is -a 29 -foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. A 2007 traffic study shows the average daily traffic count to be 1,315 vehicles with an 85h-percentile speed of 22.0 mph. Lexington Street is a 26 -foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. A 2008 traffic study shows an average daily traffic count of 273 vehicles with an 85`h- percentile speed of 24.4 mph. There are no clear view issues and there have been no reported accidents at this intersection in the past five years. Edina's residential stop sign traffic policy states that there must be 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets for stop signs to be considered. This intersection does not meet policy guidelines. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign at the intersection of Lexington Street and Concord Avenue for lack of warrants. 2. Request to restrict parking to one side of the street on West 59th Street between Kellogg Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue. This request comes from a resident on the 5800 block of Oaklawn Ave who would not be affected by this parking restriction. Requestor states that cars parked on both sides of the street cause it to narrow making it difficult to navigate. Requestor states that two of the homes on West 59th Street have multiple vehicles that are usually parked on the street. West 59th Street between Kellogg Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue is a 21- foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. There are no current parking restrictions on this block. Four homes would be affected by this parking restriction: 5845 & 5901 Kellogg Avenue and 5844 & 5900 Oaklawn Avenue. Each of these homes have driveway access onto West 59th Street. A survey was sent to these four homes seeking input from the residents. Three of the four surveys were returned all stating that they did not want any parking restrictions on West 59th Street. the survey results. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 5, 2010 due Page 3 of 6 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries\10 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety Review 05- 05- 10.doc ATTACHMENT A 3. Request for a stop sign on West 58h Street at Chowen Avenue making this an All -Way Stop intersection. There are two residents on Chowen Avenue making this request. They are concerned with the safety of children in the neighborhood as well as the speed of the traffic on West 58th Street. A dog was struck and killed at this intersection on April 7, 2010, at about 5:30 pm. This intersection is currently controlled by a two -way stop for north/south Chowen Avenue traffic. West 58th Street is a 28 -foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. There are no clear view issues and there have been no other reported accidents at this intersection in the past five years. There is a stop sign one block to the east at Beard Avenue and a traffic signal to the west at France. Avenue. A traffic study completed in the summer of 2009 on West 58th Street just west of Chowen Avenue shows an average daily traffic count of 1,872 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 30.4 mph. Edina's all -way stop sign traffic policy states, "The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours." This intersection does not meet policy warrants for an all -way stop. Staff recommends the denial of the request for an all -way stop at the intersection of West 58th Street and Chowen Avenue for lack of warrants. 4. Request for a stop sign at the intersection of Parkside Lane and Hollywood Road for Parkside Lane traffic or an advisory "Children at Play "sign in the same location. This request was sent in a letter to Mayor Hovland and forwarded to the Traffic Safety Committee for follow -up action. The letter was written by the daughter of a resident on the 4500 block of Parkside Lane who feels that cars are coming down the hill and around the corner too fast. Requestor states that neighborhood children often play street hockey and have been nearly hit by these vehicles. Parkside Lane is a 30 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. There are no parking restrictions and no clear view issues. The intersection of Parkside Lane and Hollywood Road is uncontrolled. A traffic study conducted in the summer of 2007 shows an average daily Traffic Safety Staff Review May 5, 2010 Page 4 of 6 G:\Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 05- 05- 10.doc ATTACHMENT A traffic count of 74 vehicles on Hollywood Road just to the east of Parkside Lane with an 85th- percentile speed of 21.7 mph. Hollywood Road to the west of Parkside Lane shows a daily traffic count of 153 vehicles with an 85`h- percentile speed of 24.7 mph. Warrants are not met for a stop sign at this intersection. The city is no longer putting up advisory "Children at Play" signs. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign on Parkside Lane at the intersection of Hollywood Road for lack of warrants. 5, Request for a stop sign at Brittney Road and Dunberry Lane for Brittney Road traffic. Brittney Road, just to the south of West 69th Street, turns into Dunberry Lane which continues to the east. This is a non - intersection curve in the roadway. This request comes from a resident on Dunberry Lane who is concerned with the speed of vehicles coming down the hill on Brittney Road and around the curve at Dunberry Lane. He states there was a recent accident where a driver lost control coming around the curve and ended up on one of his neighbor's lawn. Brittney Road is a 29 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. There are no clear view issues and there have been no other reported accidents in the past five years. A traffic study completed in the summer of 2006 shows Brittney Road with an average daily traffic count of 507 vehicles and an 85th- percentile speed of 24.7 mph. There is a large yellow advisory sign with a black arrow indicating the curve in the roadway. This curve does not meet warrants for a residential stop sign. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign at Brittney Road where it turns into Dunberry Lane for lack of warrants. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. Request for a stop sign for Brookview Ave at West 55th Street. A traffic study needs to be completed. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 5, 2010 Page 5 of 6 G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\StaffReview Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety Review 05- 05- 10.doc ATTACHMENT A SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled: 1. Thirty-three phone calls requesting information concerning various traffic safety issues. 2. Two calls from residents regarding parking concerns. 3. Request from a resident to increase the speed limit on Interlachen Boulevard to 35 MPH. 4. Request from the City of Bloomington concerning Edina's parking restriction policies. 5. Call from a resident wanting to know the procedure for blocking off their street for a block party. 6. A call from the Connecticut State Police wanting to know Edina's policy on "In- Street Pedestrian Signs." (How much do they cost and who do we buy them from). 7. Call from a citizen concerned about the number of traffic accidents that occur each day on Highway 62. 8. A call from a citizen wanting to know when France Avenue was going to be resurfaced. 9. Request from a resident wanting a traffic study. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 5, 2010 Page 6 of 6 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Trafric Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety Review 05- 05- 10.doc May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT B MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 18, 2010 7:06 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle approving the Council Consent Agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PRESERVATION MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read a proclamation declaring May, 2010, to be "Old is the New Green" preservation month in the City of Edina. Member Brindle moved, seconded by Member Swenson, approving a proclamation declaring May 2010 as Preservation Month. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Associate Planner Repya displayed the Preservation Month poster featuring the Browndale Bridge. 2010 HERITAGE AWARD PRESENTED Ms. Repya announced the 2010 Heritage Award was being presented to Peter and Sandy Cochrane of 4611 Arden Avenue. She reviewed before - and -after renovation pictures of their historic American colonial home and advised that the plans had been approved by the Edina Heritage Preservation Board since this home was located in the historic Country Club district, listed on the national register of historic places, and part of the Edina Heritage Landmark District. Peter Cochrane, award recipient, stated the award was an unexpected recognition. Mr. Cochrane stated he and his wife had been pleased to collaborate with Kuhl Design Build. He added they were very pleased with the outcome of their renovation. Mayor Hovland presented the 2010 Heritage Award to Peter and Sandy Cochrane and congratulated them on this accomplishment. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read a proclamation declaring May 16 -22, 2010, to be "Emergency Medical Services Week" in the City of Edina. Member Bennett moved, seconded by Member Brindle, approving a proclamation declaring Emergency Medical Services Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Fire Chief Scheerer accepted the proclamation, thanked the Council for its support, and introduced Medical Director Jeffrey Ho. Dr. Ho, thanked the Council for recognizing those who work with emergency medical services. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 4, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF MAY 4. 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 4, 2010, and Work Session of May 4, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -12 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DOMESTIC PARTNERS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. httn-// www_ ritvnfedina .com /CitvCouncil /CitvCouncil MeetinuMinutes /20100518Retz.htm 9/1/2010 May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7 Jessica Kingston, 5801 Brookview Avenue, Vice Chair of the Human Rights & Relations Commissioner, introduced Commissioners in attendance and presented the domestic partnership ordinance that would allow domestic partners registration rights and the same rights in public venues as married couples, and to provide City employees with family leave domestic partner benefits. Ms. Kingston stated the Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission (HRRC) unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance. The Council discussed the ordinance and asked questions of City Attorney Knutson regarding its wording related to the definition of a "domestic partnership" to assure it extended to both same and opposite sex partners. Arnold Bigbee, HRRC Chair, stated their goal was to be fair and equitable to all and deferred to the recommendation of the City Attorney. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to testify. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett made a motion to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2010 -12, amending Edina City Code concerning domestic partners. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council asked questions of staff and Mr. Bigbee about what, the registration program accomplished. It was indicated that homestead designation, family memberships to City facilities, and sick/bereavement leaves were available regardless of registration as domestic partners. The Council discussed that registration would. allow people who were not traditional families the ability to gain access to visit their partner, should they be hospitalized, access to school records, and could serve as evidence of partnership in other instances. Mr. Bigbee stated the ordinance and registration program would provide documentation to make it possible for people who were not traditional families to avail themselves of those benefits. Mr. Knutson stated the registration program would provide credibility but not confer legal rights. Manager Hughes indicated if first reading was granted, staff would provide a recommendation on the fees prior to second reading. The Council discussed the 45 -day cancellation clause and acknowledged that the City would assume the affidavit, if signed, met the eight definitions constituting a domestic partnership. Mr. Bigbee noted that legalized marriage of same sex partners was not allowed in the State of Minnesota and the registration program would validate the relationship as a declaration of their commitment to each other and presence in this community as a family. The Council agreed the ordinance would amplify, in printed form, the human rights expected for all residents of Edina who live in a State where marriage was not recognized between consenting adults of the same sex. The Council requested staff make typographical revisions, refine the language defining domestic partners to assure inclusiveness, and consistently reference that it pertained to two adult partners prior to second reading. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -42 ADOPTED — EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK AMENDED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to testify. http: / /www. city ofedina .com /CityCouncil/CityCouncil. _MeetingMinutes /20100518Reg.htm 9/1/2010 May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 7 Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -42, adopting amendment to employee handbook. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — 2010 FIBER INSTALLATION PHASE ONE, IT -10 -01 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for 2010 fiber -optic installation, Phase I, to the recommended low bidder, Michels Corporation at $35,042.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — FINAL LANDSCAPING FOR NEW EDINA PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member -Brindle awarding the bid for final landscaping for new Edina Public Works building to the recommended low bidder, Applied Ecological Services, Inc. at $32,991.55. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — 2010 MILL AND OVERLAY — WEST 691—H STREET Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for 2010 mill and overlay, W. 69th Street: France to York to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, Inca at $85,395.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *CHANGE ORDER FIRE PROTECTION FOR NEW EDINA PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle approving change order fire protection for the Edina Public Works building at 7450 Metro Boulevard to Summit Fire Protection Company. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — FIRE DEPARTMENT TYPE III AMBULANCE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle awarding the bid for Fire Department Type III Ambulance to the recommended low bidder, Premier Specialty Vehicles at $138,327.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSES APPROVED — RICE PAPER RESTAURANT Mr. Hughes presented the request of Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant, LLC, dba, Rice Paper Restaurant, 3948 West 50th Street, for a new on -sale wine and 3.2 beer liquor license. It was noted that all submittals had been made and staff recommended issuance of the license. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving new on -sale wine and on -sale 3.2 beer licenses to Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant, LLC, dba as Rice Paper Restaurant, for the period beginning May 18, 2010, and ending March 31,2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Steven Mark Andersen, Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant, stated this was their fourth restaurant and described menu choices offering fresh organic vegetables and presentation of high - quality Asian entr6es. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -40 ADOPTED — REVENUE FUND CREATED AND DONATION ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE CITY FOR BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND Park and Recreation Director Keprios presented staff's recommendation to accept, with sincere appreciation, the donation from the estate of http:// www. cityofedina. com/ CityCounciYCityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl201005l8Reg.htm 9/1/2010 May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 7 Ruth R. Dahl in the amount of $312.561.64 to the Braemar Memorial Fund. It was noted this was the largest cash donation made to the City. Finance Director Wallin answered the Council's questions about how memorial funds were accounted for in past audit reports as a liability. He advised the resolution would formally establish a special revenue fund for the specific purpose of enhancing the golf course, and contemplates input by the Braemar Golf Association, Braemar Men's Club, and Braemar Women's. Club related to expenditures. The Council emphasized the need to assure transparency and accountability. Mr. Knutson advised that the ordinance language regarding expenditures to require input from the Braemar Golf entities was included. at the request of the Dahls. He clarified the intent of the fund was to enhance the golf course, and the Council would make the final decision after that input. Mr. Hughes noted the golf course may receive a donation -specified to pay off bonds or to balance operational deficits. Following discussion, Council consensus was reached that all donations to the Braemar Golf Course would be deposited into the Memorial Fund with the exception of a donation directed towards paying down bond repayment or operational deficits. Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -40, creating a revenue fund and accepting donation on behalf of the City of Edina. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. John Valliere, Braemar Golf Course Manager, described Ruth and Wally Dahl's enjoyment for the game of golf and long involvement with the Braemar Golf Course. He stated the Dahls had no children, but they would like to schedule a special recognition of the Dahl's nephew and niece. Mayor Hovland extended the City's deepest .appreciation to the family of Ruth and Wally Dahl for this generous donation. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -41 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -41 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ART CENTER BOARD APPOINTMENT DISCUSSED The Council noted it had already interviewed two applicants for the Art Center Board with other applicants for 2010 appointments and agreed that the third application would be held for future interview when there was a vacancy and the applicant would be invited to re -apply in 2011 if no other vacancies arose in 2010. The Council asked staff to circulate the names of the two applicants which Council would rank and consider at the June 1, 2010, Council meeting. *RESOLUTION. NO. 2010 -36 CONTINUED — LOT DIVISION, 5500 AND 5504 HALIFAX LANE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle to continue consideration of Resolution No. 2010 -36, lot division; 5500 and 5504 Halifax Lane, to the June 1, 2010, Council meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF MAY 5. 2010 CONFIRMED Engineer /Public Works Director Houle presented the resident request for a stop sign on West 58th Street at Chowen Avenue, making it an all - way stop intersection. He reviewed the standards of the traffic policy for stop signs and advised why this intersection would not meet standards warrants. Mr. Houle cautioned that installing a stop sign httv:// www. citvofedina .com/CityCouncil/CityCouncil MeetingMinutes /20100518Reg.htm 9/1/2010 May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7 where it was not warranted could result in additional accidents. Due to lack of warrants at West 58th Street and Chowen Avenue, staff recommended denial of the request for stop signs. The Council discussed the request and cautionary signage or stop sign configurations to better control traffic and create pedestrian safety. Mr. Houle noted this was an MSA street with design criteria to keep traffic moving. Traffic Safety Coordinator Tate stated the current signage in this area was installed prior to 1957, presumably when this neighborhood was built. Henry Parkhurst, 5733 Chowen Avenue-, addressed the Council in support of the request. ,Dan Dauth, 5720 Chowen Avenue, addressed the Council in-support of the request. The Council advised residents they could petition the City to request sidewalks on 58th Avenue. Mr. Houle advised of the France Avenue restriping project and pedestrian sidewalk route as proposed in the comprehensive plan. David Strandberg, 3708 West 571h Street, addressed the Council in support of the request. Ben Dworsky, 5932 Chowen Avenue, addressed the Council in support of the request. The Council asked questions of Mr. Houle regarding the difference in warrant standards between the City's traffic policy and the State's traffic. policy. Mr. Houle explained the State had changed its policy and those changes had not been incorporated into the City's policy. Should the Council decide its policy needed to be updated, he recommended it be delayed for a period of one year since the Federal policy had just been updated and would be followed by another State policy update. Council consensus was reached that it needed to assure the traffic study contained accurate data consistent with the State's policy to factor traffic from all directions, neighborhood demographics, and park locations into the warrant standards. While the Council indicated it did not support ordering a full traffic study, support was expressed to direct staff to determine whether regulatory and cautionary signage of this neighborhood was adequate since it had been in place since at least 1957. Mr. Houle presented the resident request for a stop sign at Brittney Road and Dunberry Lane for Brittney Road traffic and traffic policy considerations. Due to lack of warrants, staff recommended denial of the request for a stop sign at Brittney Road where.it turns into Dunberry Lane. Juan Avila, 4812 Dunberry Lane, addressed the Council in support of the request. J.B. Overstreet, 4813 Dunberry Lane, addressed the Council in support of the request. Dan Holland, 4817 Dunberry Lane, addressed the Council in support of the request. Mr. Tate used a map to identify the location where warrants were taken and indicated he had conducted the study in 2008 and determined the 85th percentile speed was 24.7 mph. The Council discussed options for cautionary signage such as "Curve Ahead" with a lower posted speed limit. Mr. Houle explained that staff could determine the appropriate speed to safely maneuver the curve and post an advisory . sign. It was noted that posting an advisory sign would not address the concern of distracted drivers and that the drivers in this area were likely residents of the neighborhood. The Council discussed the timing when this corner was modified and that it had not been identified as problematic during the 2006 road reconstruction project. It was determined that reconfiguring this intersection was not feasible due to the lack of funding. The Council and staff reviewed advanced warning strategies, and consensus was reached to direct staff to install several reflectorized chevron sign posts at the end of the intersection. The residents indicated support for the installation of cautionary signage and sign posts, regardless of aesthetics. http:// www. cityofedina. com/ CityCounciYCityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl201005l8Reg.htm 9/1/2010 May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7 Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, confirming the Traffic Safety Report of May 5, 2010 moving Item B3 to C .which contained items to be acted on a later date, and upholding the denial of Item B5 with the installation of additional warning signs. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Brindle approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 6, 2010, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $116,689:47; Communications Fund $554.73; Police Special Revenue $3,321.70; Working Capital Fund $1,512,222.78; Art Center Fund $26,213.16; Golf Dome Fund $2,743.15; Aquatic Center Fund $10,272.02; Golf Course Fund $11,439.04; Ice Arena Fund $532.72; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $25,807.26; Liquor Fund $109,216.09; Utility Fund $25,691.47; Storm Sewer Fund $488.75; PSTF Agency Fund $5,861.74; TOTAL $1.851.054.08 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 13, 2010, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $104,437.96; CDBG Fund $11,643.00; Communications Fund $480.00; Police Special Revenue $1,464.00; General Debt Service Fund $425.00; Working Capital Fund $282,983.94; Art Center Fund $4,579.35; Aquatic Center Fund $1,516.49; Golf Course Fund $47,667.52; Ice Arena Fund $15,965.91; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $8,167.41; Liquor Fund $298,715.37; Utility Fund $395,859.76; Storm Sewer Fund $969.95; PSTF Agency Fund $7,700.08; TOTAL $1.182.575.74; and, Credit Card Transactions dated March 26 — April 26, 2010; TOTAL $8.515.33. . Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. UPCOMING MEETING SCHEDULE DISCUSSED — The Council discussed upcoming meetings and consensus was reached to schedule the following: Edina Country Club presentation on June 1, 2010; budget forecast on June 15, 2010; and Green Step and EEC discussion on July 6, 2010. Council consensus was also reached to authorize staff to provide utility companies with the draft franchise fee ordinance and schedule public hearings. GRANDVIEW DISTRICT — SMALL AREA STUDY DISCUSSED — Mr. Hughes explained that the comprehensive plan required that a development proposal including a rezoning or amendment to the comprehensive plan would require a small area plan prior to any planning application. The authority to initiate a small area plan rested with the Council. Mr. Hughes identified what would be included in such a plan. If the community -led Grandview District study was accepted by the Council as a small area plan, it would. also be adopted into the comprehensive plan by reference and submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review. If the Grandview District study was not accepted as such, it would remain an advisory document. The Council discussed the community -led Grandview District Study and agreed it contained a great schematic and concepts, but they would like additional details including definitive land uses, height requirements, and process. Mr. Hughes stated the City's budget did not contain any funding to hire a consultant. He suggested that a final report be written on the Grandview District for the Council's review. The Council agreed that the Grandview District Study was an asset and the City would need to take the lead and be the advocate. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, http:// www. cityofedina. com/ CityCouncillCityCouncil _Meetingminutesl20100518Reg.htm 9/1/2010 May 18, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 1, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 18, 2010, meeting available. Page 7 of 7 http:// www. cityofedina .comICityCouncillCityCouncil MeetingMinutesl201005l8Reg.htm 9/1/2010 58'MMINWAU III FIRM 100 62 494 r.MR, q 111,21 17 31 r- GRIM � w Q Co w ST W LU a w U Q w LL a7a APT c ? 95 1, go 5 APT ?,G. o 85% 30 y yt-7�T a4 ._49 5TTH ST W a8 Avg _ a8.6 ssq �o 55 31:-:Is69�: `� i ■_ 60TH ST W A'rTAf-URA=KM f1 N a / A- -DT 7 a ?-5 85t MIMI n� '- COW# -) rev` wNE �.oCa 'Ei oiv City of ' 'na 5 Traffic L irol �inee ring Dept r ®■�,t. ®�!� ®art ®fit , -�� -t ®�_ ®!� ®� v ►i ®■ mm,■ w■ mm■ m■ aam■■ mun■ u■■ a■■■ �®■ a■ n■■ n■■■■ u■a■■■■ ■nn■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I .. ■ m■ n■ m■■■■■■ m■ mmilnnm■■ mua■ unuu■ Nn■ �■ n■■ n■■■■ n ■n■■■■■u■•--- ----- �••■••�■■■■■■■■■■I - --- -- . m■■ n■ m■ m• mfmimllnn®■ mlflf■■ n■■® �■ 1®■ n■ e■■ n■ ■ ■ ■ ® ■n ■W_.O ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■�iW ■ ■ ■nl ■munununm■�� .yam. d!®■ n■■ nu■ uu■ a■ n■■an■un�nuan■■■■n■■n■■■■�,■■nl , m■■■ n�ue��aw■ nnm■■ m®-■ aunn■ m■ n■ n■■ alu_• �■a■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■.■■I . ■w�,a■■m■■m ®m■na�■mm■n■■oa■m!o: .■ v■■■ m ■u■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I , . �nnnuw■■ mm■ m■ uum■■ m®■ n■■ nn■®■ n■ u■■ u■■■ ■n■ ®■■n■ ®u■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I nun■■ m■ un■ m® m■ nn®■ mm■ nnnu■ m■®■ �■■ a■■■■ u ■u■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I . milli �n���■ ■..e�:::::.: ::: eau:::: n ::::::::::::: a�.:. iwei::: o:: a� :o:::::a:o:::n..u,nnn::n::::ni ATTACHMENT F s K� 58th Street and Beard Avenue r =:8 HourAverage jJune3;2010 D,ata,Setj ` 58th Street (Major Street) Beard Avenue (Minor Street) West Bound' East Bound' Vehicle Volume South Bound2 North Bound3 Vehicle Volume 12:00 AM 2 2 4 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 2 2 0 1 1 2:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 1 2 3 1 0 1 5:00 AM 0 3 3 3 1 4 6:00 AM 6 16 22 10 1 *7.6 O,AM it 10 11 21= - 9:00 AM 14 33 47 7 7 14 10:00 AM 14 22 36 6 6 12 11:00 AM 19 29 48 7 5 12 12:00 PM 17 30 47 14 6 20 100 PM 5 28 33 6 5 11 sx . •*6 00 PM - 2D ' '60 � ` 80 Y `' "z �.1� �15 1 ' .28 8:00 PM 17 26 43 7 7 14 9:00 PM 10 15 25 2 6 8 10:00 PM 5 6 11 1 3 4 11:00 PM 4 3 7 0 1 1 Tnt!%l . A 1b3 151 314 * 8 ttilour Average (June 3, .2010 Data Set) � w 77 3r - 1 Traffic Counts for West Bound and East Bound used Station F 2 Traffic Counts for South Bound used Station E 3 Traffic Counts for North Bound used Station G ATTACIEMENT G 1r,�,. ok a �, MULTIWAY STOP SIGNS • .�y TRAFFIC POLICY a Revised September 1, 2010 City of Edina PURPOSE: The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs. Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the discretion of the City Council. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will remain unchanged. G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \policies\multi way stop.docx ATTACHMENT G MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY (CONTINUED) 4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign installation: a. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. b. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but 3. If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. d. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. 5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \policies\multi way stop.docx ATTACHMENT H A. o e PEDESTRIAN � .y CROSSWALKS � TRAFFIC POLICY City of Edina PURPOSE: Both pedestrians and motorists in the State of Minnesota have rights and responsibilities on the roadway. Pedestrians must obey signals and yield to motorists if not crossing at an intersection or a crosswalk. Conversely, motorists are required to yield to pedestrians at crosswalks and when crossing at intersections. In other parts of the country, this law works well and pedestrians are protected. In Minnesota, the rights of pedestrians are not as respected by motorists. This fact creates the potential for accidents and injury with the improper placement of crosswalks. Excessive use of signs and pavement markings can substantially reduce the effectiveness of such devices. A consistent application of this policy will serve both the motorist and pedestrian within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the Traffic Safety Committee That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the discretion of the City Council. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records, pedestrian counts, sight obstructions and demographic analysis shall be reviewed when considering pedestrian crosswalk installations. 3. Absent engineering data, that clearly indicates the need for a pedestrian crosswalk, intersections will remain unmarked. 4. Pedestrian crosswalks unusually hazardous or pedestrian movement. Revised 5 -20 -03 by City Council shall be placed only at locations that are at locations not readily apparent as having 4 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS (Continued) 5. Pedestrian crosswalks shall only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight -hour period. 6. Marking of pedestrian crosswalks shall be established by analyzing the "Vehicle Gap Time ". The "Vehicle Gap Time" is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic (that are equal to or exceed the required pedestrian crossing time of three feet per second) recorded during the average five minute period in the Peak Hour. Pedestrian crosswalks shall be marked and signed using the following criteria: a. More than five Gaps — Pavement markings and signage only. b. Four to five Gaps — Add activated pedestal mounted flasher. Add overhead mounted flasher if roadway is over 40 feet wide. c. Less than three Gaps — Add activated overhead mounted flasher. The activated pedestal and overhead mounted flasher shall be designed per City Engineer Standards. 7. Pedestrian crosswalks shall not be located on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 MPH unless in conjunction with signalization. 8. Pedestrian crosswalks shall only be placed at intersections. 9. Any of the following conditions may warrant pedestrian crosswalks: a. Those locations adjacent to and along established pedestrian routes to and from a school. b. Locations adjacent to community centers, libraries, and other high use public facilities. C. Locations adjacent to public parks. d. Locations where accident records, sight obstructions and /or pedestrian volume (see No. 5) warrants the installation. e. Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street. f. Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. Revised 5 -20 -03 by City Council 2 3 15 8 A�IM1A71Ii7F X1100 62 494 17 21 31 w Q Y O ~355 Z w ut wet IF- I Flr�E�1�® � > w C LL ' ' F O i u C s / I— J ;' I F FF F f r " Proposed c -, Yield Sign W 74TH ST 7401 -15 '740 7400 7417 -59 X7405 7404 7409 7408 W 7413 7412 O L I 7425 Z430 w U) w x w w x 7429 7434 i IT Aw - 74.33 : 7438 W 75TH ST +01 Proposed j Stop Sign 7501 -53 City of Edina Proposed Signs NN 1 W+E `S Engineering Dept September, 2010 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 1 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 338817 9/912010 126163 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 5,225.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 245000 090310 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 5,225.00 338818 9/9/2010 106076 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 12,312.98 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00002363 244825 28775 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 12,312.98 338819 9/912010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 31.00 244727 0765017 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 56.20 244728 0724452 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 105.60 244729 0765018 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 92.00 244910 560563 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41.40 244911 0807303 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 66.60 244912 0724450 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 102.20 244913 0765016 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 47.40 244914 0807398 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 62.60 244915 0724499 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 28.80 244916 0724500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 64.40 245107 0724501 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 698.40 338820 919/2010 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 599.50 CARTRIDGES 244826 INV00098596 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 599.50 338821 9/9/2010 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 166.32 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245001 101252 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 32.71 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245169 101255 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 30.44 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245170 101256 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 32.71 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245171 101257 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 262.18 338822 91912010 102716 ALLEGRA EDINA 270.39 PARK PRESS 245172 83114 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 270.39 338823 9/9/2010 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 49.00 245002 083110 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1:3.94 245002 063110 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 112.26 245002 083110 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 137.16 245002 083110 4470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERA' R55CKREG LOG20000 1,043.68 CITY OF EDINA • Council Check Register 338824 9/9/2010 9/9/2010 -9/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 197.96 245002 083110 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 230.87 245002 083110 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 262.49 245002 083110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page- 2 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,043.68 338824 9/9/2010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 682.62 FOOD 245003 1413710 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 682.62 338826 9/9/2010 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 65.58 FLOW SWITCH 244671 36216 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 31.11 O -RING 244672 36171 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 96.69 338826 9/912010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 74.36 COFFEE 245078 417305 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 74.36 338827 9/9/2010 103191 ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION 15.00 MEMBERSHIP 849- 000 -1779 244673 082710 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 15.00 338828 9/9/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 379.95 1 -20973 1 DUMPSTER 00001334 244674 082410 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 33.00 245079 SEPT01 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 245079 SEPT01 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 245079 SEPT01 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 56.55 245079 SEPT01 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 73.92 245079 SEPT01 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 78.11 245079 SEPT01 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 78.11 245079 SEPT01 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 81.29 245079 SEPT01 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.66 245079 SEPT01 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 88.77 245079 SEPT01 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 245079 SEPT01 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 146.78 245079 SEPT01 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 197.25 245079 SEPT01 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 232.79 245079 SEPT01 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 238.25 245079 SEPT01 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 309.03 245079 SEPT01 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 424.03 245079 SEPT01 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 612.03 245079 SEPT01 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/9/2010 -9/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 452.93 245173 1- 209046 -9/10 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 3,743.79 338829 9/9/2010 124846 ASSEMBLED PRODUCTS CORPORATION 92.06 EQUIPMENT PARTS 00003109 244827 595033 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 92.06 338830 9/9/2010 127214 ATLAS FOUNDATION COMPANY 46,930.00 EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM 00007005 245081 987137 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 46,930.00 338831 91912010 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 112.32 BUSINESS CARDS 245004 473 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.32 338832 91912010 100638 BACHMAN'S 15.07 FERTILIZER 245174 14213284,142166 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 57 138.93 SHRUBS 245174 14213284,142166 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 57 154.00 338833 91912010 126300 BAUMAN, DOUG 94.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244754 083110 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 94.25 338834 9/9/2010 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,006.88 244730 54591900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 61.50 244731 54591700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 48.03 244732 84114300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 121.97 244733 84115500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 637.20 244867 54600000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 885.15 244868 54591800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 703.15 244917 54600100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 406.25 244918 54591500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.00 244919 54591600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 208.59 244920 5978600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 146.41 244921 84116300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,246.13 338835 9/9/2010 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 705.38 LAWN CARE 245082 136043 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register . 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 4 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PW BUILDING FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 705.38 338836 9/9/2010 125139 BERNICK'S WINE 285.60 245108 5092 5822.5513 285.60 338837 91912010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 21.36 SELF -SEAL MAILERS 244675 WO- 640487 -1 1600.6406 44.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 244828 WO- 640067 -1 1400.6513 59.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 244829 OE- 233591 -1 1628.6513 125.20 338838 91912010 116336 BLOOMINGTON CHRYSLER JEEP 66.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005132 245005 30094 1553.6180 66.00 338839 9/9/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 22.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 244755 62265 1552.6406 158.15 CLOCKS 00001437 245083 62358 4402.1705 180.86 338840 919/2010 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,097.88 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003786 244830 87176853 1470.6510 1,097.88 338841 9/9/2010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 195.00 244922 100528 5862.5513 195.00 338842 9/9/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 13.79 AIR FILTER 00001060 244756 418623 1553.6530 66.54 PANEL COWL 00001060 244757 418303X1 1553.6530 130.88 WIRING ASSEMBLY 00005134 245006 437905X1 1553.6530 211.21 338843 9/9/2010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 593.69 GLASS FOR GREAT HALL 00002156 245175 5138935 5620.6180 593.69 338844 9/9/2010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 8,515.21 ASPHALT 00001210 244676 8299MB 1314.6518 9,093.14 ASPHALT 00001210 244677 8308MB 1314.6518 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 4 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PW BUILDING FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10,938.87 ASPHALT 00001210 244678 8326MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 6,068.45 ASPHALT 00001210 244679 8336MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 7,213.70 ASPHALT 00001210 244680 8344MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 41, 829.37 338845 9/9/2010 120936 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10,573.40 LEGAL 245007 2851G -7/10 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 10,573.40 338846 9/912010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 11,395.80 244869 12284 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 87.65 244870 12285 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 112.70 244923 12246 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,108.60 244924 12282 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 12,704.75 338847 919/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 87.00 244871 87501 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 129.00 244925 87502 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 216.00 338848 9/912010 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 395.00 BOILER SEMINAR SERIES 244831 090110 1240.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 395.00 338849 91912010 116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 499.21 ENVELOPES 245008 27955 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 499.21 338850 9/9/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 514.90 244872 426396 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 45.00 244926 426152 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING 238.25 244927 426151 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 798.15 338851 9/912010 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 750.00 CABLE CHARGES -VIDEO 244758 48459 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 750.00 338852 9/9/2010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 367.74 00105263-0335037016 244681 335037016 -8/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 37.95 00103426 -0345052024 245009 345052024 -8/10 +552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUIL1" R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/912010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 6 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6,229.37 00103426 -0345052006 245010 345052006 -8/10 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 6,635.06 338863 9/9/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 244928 0178161015 5862.5515 245109 0148436118 5822.5515 338864 919/2010 120433 COMCAST 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 245011 199138 -8/10 5422.6188 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 245012 165667 -8/10 5424.6406 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 245013 177449 -8/10 5420.6188 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 245014 164959 -8/10 5430.6188 304.80 338856 9/9/2010 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 497.79 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 00005033 245077 03743077 1553.6610 497.79 338866 9/9/2010 101974 CONNIE'S CATERING 540.96 GOLF COURSE FOOD 245016 082610 5421.5510 540.96 338867 919/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 182,727.75 ARENA RINK CONSTRUCTION 245084 APPL. NO.7 5500.1705 182,727.75 338868 9/9/2010 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING 245017 167666 5410.6122 100.00 338869 9/9/2010 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 448.88 PRECAST CB 00001536 245018 S000021245 5932.6520 448.88 338860 9/9/2010 104020 DALCO 328.82 GRILL CLEANER, BLEACH 245019 2245798 5421.6511 328.82 338861 919/2010 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,078.00 244873 8301075 5842.5514 462.00 245110 8301068 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE SAFETY EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ADVERTISING OTHER CONCRETE CLEANING SUPPLIES Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/912010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 7 9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,540.00 338862 91912010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,403.10 244874 567101 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 711.80 244929 567100 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 66.30 245111 567098 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,852.95 245112 567099 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,034.15 338863 9/912010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 4.81 PIPE TAP 00001384 244759 508806 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 186.22 WALL CHARTS, WRENCHES 00001380 244760 508062 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.03 338864 9/9/2010 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 7.00 REIMBURSEMENT 244832 083110 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 136.16 REIMBURSEMENT 244832 083110 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 143.16 338865 9/9/2010 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 42.25 BAKERY 245020 342672 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.43 BAKERY 245021 342919 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 94.02 BAKERY 245022 342913 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 51.87 BAKERY 245023 343071 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 51.34 BAKERY 245024 343308 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 325.91 338866 919/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 550.80 110311893 244682 110311893 -8/10 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 550.80 338867 919/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 402.31 CHLORINE 244683 82701351 -10 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 4,145.36 CHEMICALS 00001215 245085 82701372 -10 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,547.67 338868 919/2010 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 32.38 MEN20 EDISON 00001549 244684 07441600 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 69.78 CONDUIT, CLAMPS 00001568 244761 07445000 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 30.63 CLAMPS, CONDUIT 00001570 244762 07447400 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 137.18 WIRES FOR WELDERS 00001549 245025 07417600 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 269.97 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 8 9/9/2010 — 919/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 338869 91912010 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 735.00 MN DISTANCE RUNNING ASSOC 244833 083110 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 735.00 338870 9/912010 103694 EDINALARM INC. 240.47 MONITORING SERVICE 244763 60963 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 269.33 MONITORING SERVICE 244764 60961 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 288.56 MONITORING SERVICE 244764 60961 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 262.91 MONITORING SERVICE 244765 60962 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 557.89 MONITORING SERVICE 244765 60962 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 1,619.16 338871 9/9/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 5,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING SERVICE 245176 61079 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 3,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING SERVICE 245177 61080 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 8,000.00 338872 9/9/2010 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,065.08 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 244834 1303259 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 40.25 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 244835 1303043 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.73 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 244836 1303554 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,143.06 338873 9/9/2010 123791 ERICKSON, MINDY 88.40 ART WORK SOLD 244984 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 88.40 338874 9/9/2010 100762 EBB BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,313.49 RISER RINGS, TOP SECTIONS 00001529 244837 NN3425 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,313.49 338876 9/9/2010 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,407.50 AUGUST TRANSPORTS 245164 090210 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,407.50 338876 9/9/2010 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 244930 873184 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.00 338877 9/9/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 33.99 CAP, ROTOR 00005099 244766 69- 019179 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 831.99 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/912010 102846 FCC.LCC 9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 36.62 RESISTOR 00005100 244838 69- 019307 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 431.24 TIE RODS, ARMS 00005121 245026 69- 019524 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 49.03 FUEL PUMP, STRAINER 00005121 245027 69- 019371 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 281.11 FUEL SENDER, GASKET 00005121 245028 69- 019366 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS DATA PROCESSING REPAIR PARTS SERVICES CUSTODIANS 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL METER REPAIR YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERA' 831.99 338878 9/912010 102846 FCC.LCC 188.48 EXTREME BASE 245029 15809 1400.6160 188.48 338879 91912010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 30,729.61 METER TEST BENCH 00005257 244767 S01211065.001 5917.6530 30,729.61 338880 9/912010 106420 FIKES SERVICES 41.25 AIR DEODORIZERS 245030 1100 5841.6162 41.25 338881 91912010 101476 FOOTJOY 1,454.31 MERCHANDISE 245031 3340611 5440.5511 1,454.31 338882 9/9/2010 106361 FOSTER, REBECCA 86.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244839 090110 1260.6107 86.00 338883 9/9/2010 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 53.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244685 083010 2210.6107 53.80 338884 91912010 103186 GERTENS 36.33 CEDAR MULCH 00001606 245165 202587 1644.6541 18.17- CREDIT 245166 202588 1644.6541 138.94 DELIVERY 00001606 245167 203481 1644.6541 157.10 338886 9/912010 102260 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF AMERIC 271.34 BAGS 245032 11423745 5440.6406 271.34 338886 91912010 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.02 R -91 PHONE 244840 2425749 1470.6188 DATA PROCESSING REPAIR PARTS SERVICES CUSTODIANS 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL METER REPAIR YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERA' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 338887 9/912010 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 29.02 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. Business Unit 1,054.15 AUGUST SERVICE 00001544 245086 0080485 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,054.15 9/9/2010 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 338888 91912010 101103 GRAINGER 29.00 BALANCE TIRES 00005126 245035 15163 1553.6180 253.36 TRAYS, FILE HOLDERS 00005028 244686 9331944638 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 252.14 WASTEBASKETS, ORGANIZERS 00005028 244687 9331305731 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 58.10 FIRST AID KITS, LAB COAT,SHOES 00005031 244768 9333129568 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 122.07 FIRST AID KITS, LAB COAT,SHOES 00005031 244768 9333129568 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 139.88 FIRST AID KITS, LAB COAT,SHOES 00005031 244768 9333129568 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 19.02 BATTERIES 00001578 244841 9334161479 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 544.17 PLASTIC BINS 00001563 245033 9328290821 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.22 BIN DIVIDERS 00001567 245034 9330394231 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 142.03 BELTS FOR HVAC 245087 9338381842 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 465.96 GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 00001533 245088 9334915700 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 248.40 UPS 00001533 245089 9334915718 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.76 FILTERS 00002164 245178 9332820472 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,350.11 00007515 244843 269960 5842.651P PAPER SUPPLIES 338889 91912010 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 00007516 245037 270132 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 10 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PSTF OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION WELL HOUSES EDINBOROUGH PARK 244931 00025643 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 338890 9/9/2010 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 29.00 BALANCE TIRES 00005126 245035 15163 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005128 245036 468237 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 83.95 338891 919/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 80.25 244875 121834 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,751.00 244932 121835 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,831.25 338892 9/912010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 196.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244842 090110 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 196.00 338893 91912010 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 169.77 REGISTER ROLLS 00007515 244843 269960 5842.651P PAPER SUPPLIES 169.77 REGISTER ROLLS 00007516 245037 270132 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2010 —9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 11 Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL• PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 339.54 CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CLEANING SUPPLIES 338894 919/2010 101733 HANLY, WILLIAM 74.95 SCHOOLBOOKS 245090 090310 1640.6104 74.95 . 338895 91912010 125270 HARTFORD 4.75 SEPT 2010 COBRA 245038 090110 1550.6043 4.75 338896 91912010 127220 HAVENS, GARY 44.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 245161 090710 1470.4329 44.00 338897 9/9/2010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 299.53 CAUSTIC SODA 244688 3151818 5311.6545 299.53 338898 91912010 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 4,328.62 WALLING 00001460 245092 747808 1344.6577 4,328.62 338899 9/9/2010 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 194.15 PIZZA 245039 1705519 5421.5510 194.15 338900 9/9/2010 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICE 244769 QB14608 1470.6103 2,475.08 338901 9/912010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1,269.68 PCS FOR PW MECH 00004360 244770 48153195 421553.6710 395.44 MONITORS FOR UTILITY BILLING 00004362 244771 48170789 1554.6710 106.87- CREDIT 00004347 244772 48166886 1554.6710 1,558.25 338902 9/912010 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 125.17 AIR FRESHENER 00002163 245179 6439471 5620.6511 125.17 338903 9/912010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,996.25 244876 533131 5842.5514 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 11 Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL• PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG2000D CITY OF EDINA 9/912010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 12 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 453.00 244933 533071 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 56.00 245113 533118 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 999.50 245114 533117 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,504.75 338904 9/9/2010 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 494.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 245168 090710 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 494.00 338905 9/9/2010 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 93.62 MEETING EXPENSES 245180 090710 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 93.62 338906 919/2010 126408 HUFCOR MINNESOTA LLC 7,115.00 ACCORDION FOLDING DOORS 00005894 245040 1869 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 2,100.00 ACCORDION FOLDING DOORS 00005894 245041 1909 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 9,215.00 338907 9/9/2010 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 2,358.28 VFD REPAIR 00001512 244773 4153 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 2,358.28 338908 9/912010 127184 IVERSON, KATHLEEN 65.00 ART WORK SOLD 244985 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 338909 9/912010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 9,616.75 244934 1423475 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 337.20 245042 1428251 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,674.50 245115 1423476 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,347.32 245116 1423501 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,190.80 245117 1423453 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 173.80 245118 1423499 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9,589.79 245119 1423498 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,302.47 245120 1423508 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 73.90 245121 1423509 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 38,306.53 338910 919/2010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 58.46 GRASS SEED 00001550 244844 55438965 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 58.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 13 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 338912 9/9/2010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,840.38 244734 1897096 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,013.83 244735 1897094 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,087.22 244877 1897076 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,020.23 244878 1897087 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,660.68 244879 1897085 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22.07- 244880 469586 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.03- 244881 469585 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.20- 244882 469584 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29.12 244935 1901610 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,732.90 244936 1901615 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,742.92 244937 1901612 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 244938 1901613 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 233.24 244939 1901608 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,970.56 244940 1901611 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 302.90 244941 1901609 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,042.82 244942 1901614 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 100.37- 244943 469587 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 98.11 245122 1901607 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,988.80 245123 1901606 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,613.54 245124 1901603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 185.24 245125 1901600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,178.83 245126 1901602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,400.50 245127 1901601 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 245128 1901599 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,826.13 245129 1901604 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 245130 1901605 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,889.50 245131 1901598 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,211.11 245132 1901597 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 112.12 245133 1901593 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 133.25 245134 1901594 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 546.92 245134 1901594 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,535.75 245135 1901596 5822.5513 jCOST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,541.54 245136 1901595 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.69- 245137 470051 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9.79- 245138 470049 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 88.83- 245139 470139 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 59.77- 245140 470048 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 213.24- 245141 470050 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 62,420.63 338913 919/20 124869 JOHNSON, BRYAN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.20 ART WORK SOLD 244986 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 70.20 338914 9/9/2010 118069 JOYCE, CYNTHIA 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 244987 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 69.55 338916 9/9/2010 126301 KENNY BOILER & MFG. CO. 681.50 BOILER INSPECTION 00008012 244774 76357 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 681.50 338916 9/9/2010 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 102.10 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244845 090110 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 102.10 338917 9/9/2010 101602 KONTERS, VIK 92.61 UNIFORM PURCHASE 245043 083110 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 92.61 338918 9/912010 122446 LACKAS, TIM 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9/12/10 245181 090310 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 338919 9/9/2010 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 44.95 REPAIR PARTS 00002349 244846 215192 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 44.95 338920 9/9/2010 116722 LANZO, BARBARA 318.50 ART WORK SOLD 244988 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 318.50 338921 9/9/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 342.55 .NUTS. BOLTS. OPENBSHUT 00005024 244689 9529933 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 342.55 338922 91912010 116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA 83.85 ART WORK SOLD 244989 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 83.85 338923 9/912010 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 81.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244847 090110 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 81.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,240.10 CITY OF EDINA 244736 92839 5842.5515 EDINBOROUGH PARK Council Check Register 244737 93109 5822.5515 919/2010 - 9/9/2010 2,983.26 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 338924 9/9/2010 101792 LOBE -TECH 564.30 776.48 DELO GREASE 00005040 244775 1808564 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 776.48 338925 9/9/2010 9/9/2010 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 101987 MENARDS 81.00 EVIDENCE BAGS 244848 227168 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00002364 244776 12935 81.00 158.28 338926 9/9/2010 12581 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 15 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,240.10 CENTENNIAL LAKES 244736 92839 5842.5515 EDINBOROUGH PARK 743.16 244737 93109 5822.5515 2,983.26 338927 9/912010 100876 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 564.30 PLANTS 00002138 245182 49310 5620.6620 564.30 338928 9/9/2010 101987 MENARDS 55.63 ROPE, HARDWARE, TAPE 00002364 244776 12935 5630.6406 158.28 PAINT AND SUPPLIES 00002369 244649 12581 5630.6406 298.29 ALGAECIDE, MOWER 00002368 245183 15098 5630.6406 26.78 TAPE, PAINTERS TOOLS 00002166 245184 16345 5620.6406 538.98 338929 9/9/2010 100885 METRO SALES INC 294.00 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 245044 373138 1552.6103 294.00 338930 9/912010 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 355,505.96 SEWER SERVICE 245093 0000940227 5922.6302 355,505.96 338931 9/9/2010 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 129.95 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005125 245045 175990 1553.6180 129.95 338932 9/9/2010 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN 138.78 ART WORK SOLD 244990 083110 5101.4413 138.78 338933 9191204' 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 15 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 16 9/9/2010 — 9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,500.74 ASPHALT 00001224 244691 106547MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,500.74 338934 9/9/2010 101604 MIDWEST GANG INVESTIGATORS ASS 50.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 245046 090210 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 338936 919/2010 102442 MIKE'S PRO SHOP 15.69 PLATE & PARTS FOR TROPHY 244777 56934 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 15.69 338936 9/9/2010 121063 MILLER, SUSAN 359.94 PETTY CASH 245185 090310 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 359.94 338937 9/9/2010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,470.00 REPAIR WATER SERVICE 00001538 244850 33690 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,470.00 338938 9/9/2010 116498 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE SWING BAND 100.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9/19/10 245186 090310 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 338939 919/2010 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 42.75 WINDOW CLEANING 244851 921075419 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 10.71 WINDOW CLEANING 244852 9529035730 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 32.14 WINDOW CLEANING 244853 9529035730 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 85.60 338940 9/9/2010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,145.70 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001213 244692 61688 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,145.70 338941 9/9/2010 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 309.59 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASSES 244854 10661 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 309.59 338942 9/9/2010 117016 MOLITOR & ASSOCIATES 119.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 245187 090210 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 119.00 338943 9/912010 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9/16/10 245188 090310 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 338944 9/9/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 122.68 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001595 245094 756244 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 122.68 338945 9/912010 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 642.32 1/4 TURN VALVE 00001518 244690 00184161_SNV 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 642.32 338946 9/912010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 342.00 244883 61523 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 696.00 244944 61522 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,038.00 338947 9/9/2010 127217 NORDBY, CLAUDETTE 126.00 CLASS REFUND 245189 083110 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 126.00 338948 91912010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 286.06 SKETCH PADS, PENCILS 00009249 245047 39385600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 286.06 338949 9/912010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 82.04 TONER 00006034 245048 1248143621 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 43.90 NOTES, FOLDERS 245190 530161724001 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 125.94 338950 9/9/2010 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 191.10 ART WORK SOLD 244991 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 191.10 338951 9/912010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 27.63 SHACKLES 00005092 244693 606651 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.63 338952 9/912010 123786 OLSON, VICKI 95.55 ART WORK SOLD 244992 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 95.55 338953 91912011 126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 720.75 CITY OF EDINA 245191 36234 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES Council Check Register 9/9/2010 — 9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 73.72 AERATOR 00001566 244694 863.70 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245049 090310 04371.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 73.72 2,700.66 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245049 090310 05493.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 9/9/2010 3,135.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245049 090310 03450.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 3,876.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245049 090310 03458.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 50TH ST SELLING 14,477.31 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245049 090310 01374.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 32,615.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245049 090310 01361.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 57,667.67 2,031.03 244945 338954 9/912010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 108686 OTTERLIE, JON 1,408.77 244946 8272838 -IN 81.68 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 245162 090710 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 244947 81.68 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 338965 9/912010 124450 OVERHOLT, LUTHER 338959 91912010 156.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 245095 090210 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 156.50 244855 8381003 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES 338956 9/9/2010 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 18 Business Unit STS -371 INTERLACHEN BLUFF WM-493 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE SS-450 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE SS-458 INTERLACHEN BLUFF BA-374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF BA -361 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 245191 36234 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 720.75 338957 9/9/2010 118872 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA INC. 73.72 AERATOR 00001566 244694 17445800 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 73.72 338968 9/9/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,332.28 244738 8272176 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,129.43 244884 8272996 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 486.00 244885 8273003 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,031.03 244945 8273006 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,408.77 244946 8272838 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,408.77- 244947 8272839 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,978.74 338959 91912010 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 244855 8381003 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 338960 9/9/2010 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 418.19 , 244778 64001586 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 910.88 245050 64001637 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,329.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 19 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 338961 9/9/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 176.00 244739 2954420 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.19- 244740 3443240 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.32- 244741 3440764 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.89- 244742 3440765 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,331.43 244886 2954193 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 757.79 244948 2957325 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,833.60 244949 2955853 5862.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,582.43 244950 2957322 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 244951 2957323 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.12 244952 2957318 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,019.46 244953 2957324 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,660.14 245142 2957315 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 237.88 245143 2957316 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 692.49 245144 2957321 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,833.60 245145 2955852 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,887.25 245146 2955851 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 245147 2957317 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 993.21 245148 2957320 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,419.19 245149 2957319 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.00- 245150 3442239 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 18,459.43 338962 9/9/2010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 280.00 244743 10927 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 535.20 245151 10992 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 815.20 338963 91912010 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.52 PEST CONTROL 245096 1898488 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.52 338964 9/912010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 127.72 CENTERING PIN SET 00005015 244856 780142 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 998.75 TIRES 00001423 244857 780805 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,126.47 338965 9/9/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 UTILITY PERMIT #939 245051 090210 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 338966 9/9/201n 100971 QUALITY WINE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 20 9/9/2010 -919/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,964.00 244887 350753 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,830.00 244888 350752 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,228.77 244889 350751 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,165.87 244890 350759 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 396.00 244891 351022 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,058.70 244892 350903 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 369.80 244893 350900 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.60 244894 350901 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 417.60 244895 351020 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,512.27 244954 350754 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 937.34 244955 351021 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 866.80 244956 350902 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16,765.75 338967 919/2010 123898 QWEST 367.60 952 927 -8861 244695 8861 -8/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.71 952 929 -0297 244696 0297 -8/10 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 423.31 338968 9/912010 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 53.45 POOL VAC BELTS 245192 208672 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 53.45 338969 919/2010 127221 RICE, JEAN 85.79 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 245163 090710 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 85.79 338970 9/912010 118668 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 227.38 WINDSHIELD TINT 00005130 245052 60280 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.03 WINDSHIELD TINT 00005133 245053 60183 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 449.41 338971 91912010 127196 ROTHMAN, AMY 2.71 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 244697 083010 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 37.29 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 244697 083010 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 40.00 338972 9/912010 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 39.23 STAKES 00001565 244698 40867793 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 69.48 LUMBER 00001565 244699 40869002 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 87.83 LUMBER 00001036 245097 40854267 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 196.54 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page- 21 9/9/2010 —9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 338973 919/2010 127219 SCHMIDT, JULIE 96.00 EDINBOROUGH MEMBER REFUND 245193 090310 5601.4532 SEASON TICKETS EB /CL REVENUES 96.00 338974 919/2010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 118.30 ART WORK SOLD 244993 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 118.30 338975 919/2010 127213 SILVIS, LUCINDA 84.50 ART WORK SOLD 244994 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 84.50 338976 919/2010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 46.44 BUSINESS CARDS 245098 66056 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 46.44 338977 9/9/2010 119422 SIZER, CORA LEE 62.40 ART WORK SOLD 244995 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 62.40 338978 9/9/2010 106416 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY INC. 1,344.00 BASKETBALL PROGRAM 244779 3241023817 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,344.00 338979 9/9/2010 123906 SNIPERCRAFT INC. 3,200.00 SWAT SUPERVISOR COURSE 245099 0827SS2010 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 3,200.00 338980 9/9/2010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 1,250.00 REGISTRATION FEES 245054 8432• 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,250.00 338981 9/912010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 172.25 ART WORK SOLD 244996 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 172.25 338982 9/9/2010 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 144.74 PROPANE 00001667 245100 082310 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 247.71 PROPANE 00001667 245100 082310 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 392.45 R55CKREG LOG20000 625.25 1553.6530 CITY OF EDINA 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 338984 91912010 CONTRACTED REPAIRS Council Check Register CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 FALL ADS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 338983 919/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 338985 91912010 220.79 GALV PIPE 00001026 244780 S2221982.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 189.82 VALVES, PIPE 00005096 244859 S2250680.001 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 214.64 FAUCET 00002166 245194 S2250498.001 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1553.6530 625.25 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 338984 91912010 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 101007 STAR TRIBUNE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 3,775.00 FALL ADS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 245055 083110 3,775.00 338985 91912010 124476 STEVENS. ENGINEERS INC. ' 1,699.68 CONSULTING SERVICES 244858 8304 5,951.81 CONSULTING SERVICES 245056 8320 7,651.49 338986 9/912010 101015 STREICHERS 331.29 PUSH BUMPERS, GRILL LIGHTS 245057 1767220 331.29 338987 919/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 73.95 ATF CONNECTOR 00005090 244781 259239 95.45 BEARING 00005089 244782 259237X1 18.34 PINS 00005089 244783 259237 1,430.62 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005129 245058 577261 1,086.74 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005131 245059 577582 917.98 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005124 245060 577550 366.59 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005095 245061 578249 2,553.24 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005127 245062 577799 13.03 F- SWITCH 00001422 245063 260071 6,555.94 338988 9/9/2010 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 7,626.60 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 &8 245101 091010 7,626.60 338989 9/9/2010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 260.00 AD FOR CLASSES 00008011 244784 1270339 260.00 338990 919/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,162.00 244896 Z01425 596.00 245152 MVP01465 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5511.6406 5842.5514 5862.5514 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 22 Business Unit UIJ I RIDU I IVIV EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTINGENCIES ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2010 - 9/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5101.4413 5421.6102 1647.6103 47069.6710 5862.5515 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 1600.6107 1120.6103 1553.6580 5630.6406 1330.6215 ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELDING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,758.00 338991 919/2010 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 58.50 ART WORK SOLD 244997 083110 58.50 338992 9/912010 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 245064 893355 38.00 338993 9/9/2010 113649 TENNIS WEST 8,370.00 RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS 00001484 244860 10-777 -992 1,160.00 DEMO & SALVAGE HOCKEY RINK 00001585 245102 10-777 -991 9,530.00 338994 91912010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 146.50 244744 605904 303.00 245065 00772297 223.85 245066 605853 128.75 245153 606689 6,777.75 245154 606694 486.00 245155 607150 8,065.85 338995 91912010 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 258.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 244861 090110 258.75 338996 9/9/2010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 106.25 8/17/10 COUNCIL MTG MINUTES 244862 M17909 106.25 338997 9/9/2010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 81.13 TIPS, NOZZLES, WIRE CONDUIT 00001389 244785 319198 40.80 WELDING TANKS 245195 407796 121.93 338998 9/912010 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 417.88 DIP SWITCHES 00001467 245103 0000044646 417.88 338999 919120" 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 5101.4413 5421.6102 1647.6103 47069.6710 5862.5515 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 1600.6107 1120.6103 1553.6580 5630.6406 1330.6215 ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELDING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 24 9/9/2010 —9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 149.60 FITNESS FOR DUTY 245196 101698701 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.60 339000 9/9/2010 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 240.00 DOOR LOUVERS 245197 409362 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 240.00 339001 9/912010 103048 U.S. BANK 1,000.00 TRUSTEE FEE 244863 2691189 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 1,000.00 339002 9/912010 120661 UNITED STATES TREASURY 848.49 FORM 8038 -T 41 -6005118 245198 090310 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 848.49 339003 9/9/2010 127215 UPPER MIDWEST CHAPTER - NATAS 50.00 MEMBERSHIP - MARTY DOLL 245199 0 2210.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS ' 50.00 339004 9/9/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 9.49 SHIPPING CHARGES 245067 090110 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.85 245068 090210 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.34 339006 9/9/2010 100668 URS CORPORATION 14,700.00 LANDSCAPING 245069 4273654 01364.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -364 PROMENADE PHASE 2 14,700.00 339006 9/9/2010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 3,358.05 WATER SERVICE REPAIRS 00001540 245070 15733 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,358.05 339007 919/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 94.35 TUMBLERS 245071 169678 -02 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 643.53 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 245072 170561 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 11.41 BOX CUTTERS 245073 170561 -01 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 749.29 339008 9/9/2010 116869 VANCE BROTHERS INC. 252.53 BILLY GOAT WIRE WHEELS 00005030 244786 18960 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 252.53 R55CKREG LOG20000 244745 0029092 -IN CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 162.00 244897 0029091 -IN Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 171.13 244957 0029094 -IN 9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339009 919/2010 244959 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 339017 9191201P 117482 WINECONNECTINC. 108.81 245201 2451875284 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 339014 9/9/2010 108.81 101076 WEIGLE, SUE 339010 9/9/2010 GOLF PRIZES 244864 090210 1628.4392.02 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 200.00 122.93 KEY LOCKS, LOCKOUT TAGS 00001342 245074 255101 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 122.93 339011 9/9/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION 146.50 244745 0029092 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 162.00 244897 0029091 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 171.13 244957 0029094 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,665.50 244958 0029093 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 492.50 244959 0029243 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS 508.40 244898 250367 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE -YORK SELLING 785.20 244899 250366 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 592.25 244960 250365 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,885.85 339016 919/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 64.24 244746 2,637.63 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 339012 919/2010 244961 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 166.90 CONCESSION PRODUCT 244700 26943132 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 166.90 138.24 245157 339013 9/9/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 124743 WALSTED, KRISTEN 6,497.28 110.50 ART WORK SOLD 244998 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 339017 9191201P 117482 WINECONNECTINC. 110.50 339014 9/9/2010 101076 WEIGLE, SUE 200.00 GOLF PRIZES 244864 090210 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE 200.00 339016 91912010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE POOL CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS 508.40 244898 250367 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE -YORK SELLING 785.20 244899 250366 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 592.25 244960 250365 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,885.85 339016 919/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 64.24 244746 329896 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,462.79 244961 330560 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 832.01 245156 330559 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 138.24 245157 330558 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 6,497.28 339017 9191201P 117482 WINECONNECTINC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Council Check Register Page - 26 9/9/2010 -9/9/2010 Check # Date 339019 91912010 339020 91912010 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 159.24 WEB - SEPT 2010 245075 624 159.24 231.60 12.71 - 57.28- 19,455.22 2,478.31 45.08 20.30 - 12.00- 2,353.68 2,177.51 55.95 1,227.90 2,523.10 3,442.76 4,333.82 73.32 26.88 40.00 - 64.97- 39.80- 12.75- 780.00 38,945.32 3,197.75 2,747.30 128.80 1,349.80 96.00 165.60 1,392.37 1,200.00 60.00 5,815.50 2,818.28 408.00 1,712.05 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 244747 448157 244748 808666 244749 808663 244900 450258 244901 450260 244902 450259 244903 808123 244904 808877 244962 450256 244963 450257 244964 448156 244965 448155 244966 450255 244967 451115 244968 450252 244969 450253 244970 446388 244971 808861 244972 808673 244973 807074 244974 808746 245158 451116 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 244750 651141 244751 650769 244752 650770 244753 650751 244975 BRAEMAR GC 244976 650054 244977 650514 244978 651033 244979 650515 244980 651742 244981 650752 245159 653785 245160 653559 Account No 5842.6406 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5662.5515 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5842.5513 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5842.5514 5421.5514 5430.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5822.5514 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 339021 91912010 339022 9/912010 339024 919/2010 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 21, 091.45 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 263.68 MINI GOLF BALLS 263.68 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2010 - 9/912010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00002370 244865 247828 5630.6406 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,275.40 1,275.40 101726 XCEL ENERGY 68.63 51- 9608462 -5 216.68 51- 5938955 -6 2,946.80 51- 9011854 -4 22.16 51- 6050184 -2 79.86 51- 9422326 -6 139.91 51- 9337452 -8 161.83 51- 8987646 -8 24.95 51- 8976004 -9 22.75 51- 8976004 -9 5,947.61 51-4827232-6 166.13 51 -6229265 -9 2,126.96 51- 6229265 -9 34.24 51- 8102668 -0 840.18 51- 6046826-0 1,273.42 51- 6223269 -1 58.27 51- 6692497 -0 264.96 51- 9251919 -0 1,935.52 51- 5107681 -4 2,533.84 51- 5547446 -1 21.69 51- 6541084 -2 38.49 51- 6892224 -5 344.63 51- 8324712 -5 78.29 51- 8526048 -8 37.57 51- 8997917 -7 55.91 51 -4420190 -3 11,369.15 51- 9603061 -0 30,211.27 51 -4621797 -2 685.17 51- 5634814 -2 5,204.85 51- 4966303 -6 3,729.89 51- 4159265 -8 1,141.36 51- 5847121 -5 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 27 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 244905 253637 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 244701 251173653 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 244702 251461937 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 244703 250972657 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 244704. 250927069 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 244705 251161937 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 244706 251160579 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244707 251151930 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244708 25097665 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244709 251154669 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244710 251257531 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 244711 251292022 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 244711 251292022 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 244712 251313200 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244713 251460134 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 244714 250927220 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 244715 250937759 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 244716 250986173 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 244717 250901909 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 244718 250915316 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 244719 250934481 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 244720 250943441 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244721 250962442 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244722 250964754 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 244723 250972827 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244724 250887547 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244725 250983889 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 244726 251264220 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244787 251452763 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 244788 251439575 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 245104 250884007 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 245105 251779735 114.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & R' 'OIR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2010 —9/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 18,924.31 51- 4888627 -1 245106 251760584 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 90,707.28 339026 9/9/2010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 9,267.26 FUEL 00001010 244866 995965 1553.6581 GASOLINE 9,267.26 339026 91912010 118994 ZAMORA, DAWN 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 244999 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 61.75 339027 9/912010 127218 ZELLA, ROBERT 46.24 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 245200 083110 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 46.24 339028 9/9/2010 101091 ZIEGLER INC 48.37 HOSE, COUPLINGS 00001416 245076 PC001224633 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 48.37 339029 9/9/2010 119168 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,264.29 PREMIUM 245080 66199 -8/10 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 3,264.29 339030 9/912010 126270 HARTFORD 5,077.19 PREMIUM 245091 4995498 -5 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 5,077.19 1,279,012.58 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,279,012.58 Total Payments 1,279,012.58 9/9/2010 7:41:49 Page - 28 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING_ R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 9/9/2010 - 9/9/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 179,634.07 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 246.96 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 5,848.49 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 1,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 85,877.01 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,269.68 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,181.42 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,273.42 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 7,514.78 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 9,233.48 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 257,416.08 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 18,366.49 05800 LIQUOR FUND 270,315.66 05900 UTILITY FUND 417,286.14 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,311.24 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 7,896.18 09900 PAYROLL FUND 8,341.48 Report Totals 1,279,012.58 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s nd procedures date 17 � 6v C 9/9/2010 7:42:43 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 41.78 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 101253 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245401 101254 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339045 9/16/2010 69.00 102971. ACE ICE COMPANY 245428 101258 5430.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 62.80 245333 562741 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 15.20 245334 562743 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 28.80 245335 0724542 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,747.20 42.40 7108 245542 0724544 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 14920 LIGHT POLE REMOVAL 00002157 245430 7096 5620.6180 339046 911612010 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 2,871.40 213.14 SCOREBOARD REPAIRS 245269 33870 -14 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 213.14 339047 9116/2010 RECYCLING 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 2269198 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page- 1 Business Unit TUKR JtLL11Vla 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 41.78 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245400 101253 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 116.60 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245401 101254 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 60.92 CABINET 00005038 245402 101322 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245428 101258 5430.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 288.30 339048 9/1612010 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 1,747.20 OUTDOOR LIGHT POLES ELECTRICWD02159 245429 7108 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,124.20 LIGHT POLE REMOVAL 00002157 245430 7096 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,871.40 339049 9/16/2010 100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 37,683.00 RECYCLING 245505 2269198 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 37,683.00 339050 9/16/2010 103357 ALPHA VIDEO &'AUDIO INC. 24.05 LIGHT SOCKET ASSEMBLY 245202 SVCINV11809 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 24.05 339051 9/1612010 100666 AMSAN 5.58 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001481 245203 229631726 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5.58 339052 911612010 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,047.97 FOOD 245431 1399170 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 6.75 ONIONS 245432 1416205 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,598.66 FOOD 245433 1417841 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,653.38 339063 9/16/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check.Register Page - 2 9/16/2010 -9/1612010 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 190.37 TRASH PULP 245506 1- 146354 -9/10 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 190.37 339064 911612010 100266 AT &T MOBILITY 44.91 245434 870517029X09021 . 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 0 44.91 339055 9/16/2010 127226 ATHLETIC SYSTEMS 3,120.00 RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT 00001262 245204 110 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 3,690.00 RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT 00001501 245205 111 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 6,810.00 339056 9/16/2010 102120 ATOL, ROBERT 140.00 CLOTHING PURCHASE 245435 090810 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 140.00 339067 9116/2010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 1,350.00 REMOVE/INSTALL RADAR UNITS 245436 3356 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,350.00 339068 9/1612010 104346 BARCLAY AUDIO 553.64 THEATER LIGHTING REPAIR 00002142 245438 072610 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 553.64 339059 9116/2010 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 714.73 BATTERIES 00005143 245437 4553 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 714.73 339060 9116/2010 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,111.65 245336 54677600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324.35 245337 54680300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 140.55 245338 - 54677400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 452.30 245339 54677200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186.05 245340 54680100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 222.20 245341 54677300 5822:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 129.05 245342 54677500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 155.07 245343 84142400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 241.46 245344 84142500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,962.68 339061 9/16/2010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9114/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41.07 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OOOMARCH245439 033110 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 50.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OOOAPRIL 245440 043010 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 42.80- PAID IN ERROR 245441 FEB MILEAGE 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 85.33 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 245442 090910 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 134.00 339062 9/16/2010 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 94.34 TOILET SERVICE 00001607 245206 22572 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 94.34 339063 9/16/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 50.20 MAILING LABELS 00001437 245270 62418 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50.20 339064 9116/2010 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,671.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003788 245507 87179945 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 120.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003788 245508 87180397 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,791.30 339065 9/16/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 190.90 ALTERNATOR 00005110 245403 440138 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.84 CAP, ELEMENT, O-RING KIT 00005113 245443 440658 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 313.74 339066 9/1612010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,195.00 MATERIALS TESTING 245509 324306 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1,195.00 339067 9/16/2010 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 192.92 FRAMING 245510 020000412 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 192.92 339068 9/16/2010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,224.05 245345 12401 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.70 245346 12394 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 796.55 245543 12400 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,044.30 339069 9116/2010 116663 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 266.00 245347 87564 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 310.00 245348 87565 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 576.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 4 9/16/2010 —9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339070 9/16/2010 100681 CATCO 67.42 PURGE VALVE KIT 00005142 245404 3 -94363 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.42 339071 9116/2010 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 59.17 TOUGHBOOK STYLUS 00004345 245577 THH1276 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.58 TOUGHBOOK STYLUS 00004345 245578 TGF9686 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.75 339072 9116/2010 123998 CELEBRATION BRASS - USE 121162 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/22/09 213805 061209 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 339073 9/16/2010 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 5590919 -6 245511 5590919 -6 -8110 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 12.82 339074 9/16/2010 127227 CFA SOFTWARE INC. 2,000.00 CFA INTERFACE PROGRAM 00001300 245271 10943 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,000.00 339076 9/16/2010 100686 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 10/2/09 222774 101609 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 339076 9/1612010 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 395.19 % XCEL BILL 00001703 245272 4574 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 395.19 339077 9/16/2010 127233 CITY OF ST MICHAEL 50.00 CONFERENCE FEE (2) 245405 OCT 7 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 50.00 339078 9/16/2010 114548 CIZEK, DARIN 46.74 UNIFORM PURCHASE 245444 090910 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 46.74 339079 9/16/2010 120972 CMMG INC. 23.50 P90 SCREWS 00003133 245207 12948 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 23.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/16/2010 — 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339080 911612010 120747 CMS 150.00 DRUG TESTING 245208 082010532294 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 150.00 339081 911612010 101704 COOK, BARBARA 901.97 PROGRAM DIRECTOR 245209 10 -1547 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 901.97 339082 9116/2010 101916 COUNTRY FLAGS 160.31 FLAGS 00003794 245512 5055 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 339083 9/1612010 100699 CULLIGAN!BOTTLED WATER }' 64.77 114 - 09855685 -4 WATER 245513 1309760 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY- - 64.77 339084 9/16/2010 127231 CURTI, JULIE 140.00 PROGRAM REFUND 245406- .090810 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 140.00 339085 911612010 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 432.32 REMOTE READERS 00001706 245445 6560713 5916.6406 _- GENERAL SUPPLIES METER READING 432.32 339086 9116/2010 104020 DALCO 15,237.43 FLOOR SCRUBBER 00005983 245273 2233898 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 15,237.43 339087 9116/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,777.40. 245349 567948 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 245544 567875 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,560.45 245545 567874 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,302.45 245546 567801 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,661.80 339088 9/16/2010 102465 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 4.04 VALVE 00005139 245274 4- 125474 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.04 339089 9/16/2010 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 59.99 ACCT 622833 WATER 245446 7069191 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 59.99 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register _ Page - 6 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339090 9/16/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 145.85 METRIC SET 00001173 245447 501017 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 145.85 339091 9116/2010 122135 DENFELD; SCOTT 145.33 DVD RECORDER 245407 090910 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ..COMMUNICATIONS 145.33 339092 911612010 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 36.36 BAKERY 245448 343382 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.96 BAKERY 245449 - 343494 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 101.89 BAKERY 245450 343622 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 35.46 BAKERY 245451 343805 5421.5510 COST OF.GOODS SOLD GRILL 242.67 339093 9/1612010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 22.75 245275 110312148 -8/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.75 245275 `110312148 -8/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK 0CCUPANCY 22.75 245275 110312148 -8/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE- VERNON OCCUPANCY. 115.40 110311867 245452 110311867 -8/10 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER - EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 183.65 339094 9/16/2010 123162 DISH NETWORK 38.49 8255 70 708 1422839 245514 090410 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.49 339095 9/16/2010 101766 DISPLAY SALES 1,112.15 FLAGS 00002377 245276 INVO074998 - 5650.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE 1,112.15 339096 9116/2010 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 17.26 LUBE 00001584 245277 07467500.' 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 17.26 339097 9/1612010 123189- EDINA LIQUOR 222.75 WINE 245453 115- 090310 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 'GRILL 222.75 339098 911612010 101630 EDINA'PUBLIC SCHOOLS 132.00 GYM USE PERMIT #37678 245408 9947 1600.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 132.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 STAFF PHOTOS 08326063 245456 T2- 293211 CITY OF EDINA PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 81.28 Council Check Register 339105 9/1612010 127236 FELDMAN, JULIE 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 . Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339099 911612010 101407 EGAN, MATT 339106 9/1612010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 391.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 245278 090910 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 391.00 397.20 REPAIR OF METROTECH 00001665 245280 S01272007.002 5913.6180 339100 9116/2010 521.59 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 00001665 245281 S01272266.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 126.77 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 245515 1305770 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 339107 9/16/2010 126.77 2,447.43 339101 9/16/2010 01E1584462 102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 2,447.46 FORKLIFT FOR PW 00001205 245282 01 E1584462 157.37 AUDIO VISUAL CART 00001582 245409 174635 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 01E1584462 421305.6710 157.37 STREET EQUIPMENT 9,789.75 339102 911612010 104991 EVANS, CONNIE 24.44 REIMBURSEMENT 245454 090810 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102.42 REIMBURSEMENT 245454 090810 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 126.86 339103 9/16/2010 122549 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 518.99 FOOD 245455 7576317 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 518.99 339104 9/16/2010 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 7 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GRILL GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 81.28 STAFF PHOTOS 08326063 245456 T2- 293211 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 81.28 339105 9/1612010 127236 FELDMAN, JULIE 125.00 RASMUSSEN PHOTO REFUND 245516 090910 5601.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES 125.00 339106 9/1612010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 50.00 LOCATOR REPAIR 00001545 245279 S01270989.001 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 397.20 REPAIR OF METROTECH 00001665 245280 S01272007.002 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 521.59 CS REPAIR PARTS 00001665 245281 S01272266.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 968.79 339107 9/16/2010 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 2,447.43 FORKLIFT FOR PW 00001205 245282 01E1584462 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 2,447.46 FORKLIFT FOR PW 00001205 245282 01 E1584462 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 4,894.86 FORKLIFT FOR PW 00001205 245282 01E1584462 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 9,789.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9114/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 8 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339108 9/1612010 100764 G & K SERVICES 88.13 245457 083110 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 109.27 245457 083110 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 195.30 245457 083110 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 315.15 245457 083110 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 499.26 245457 083110 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 618.55 245457 083110 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 715.00 245457 083110 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,540.66 339109 9/16/2010 123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE 123.73 MUMS 00006314 245458 297842 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 123.73 339110 911612010 127232 GASTON- CARRERE, BRUNNO 75.08 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 245410 090710 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.08 339111 9/16/2010 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 211.79 PARTS 245411 083110 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,116.29 PARTS 245411 083110 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,328.08 339112 9/16/2010 126936 GOLF SCORECARDS INC. 903.70 SCORECARDS 00006098 245459 31100 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 903.70 339113 911612010 101103 GRAINGER 243.69 SHOP SUPPLIES 00001581 245210 9334874303 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 535.74 FILTER, CARTRIDGES 00005036 245283 9335867967 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 553.66 GLOVES 00006436 245460 9322305575 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 57.19 DISPLAY RACK 00001671 245461 9340652875 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,390.28 339114 9/16/2010 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005106 245284 16151 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.95 339116 9/1612010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 352.50 245547 121962 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 352.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF_EDINA Council Check Register 9116/2010 — 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339116 911612010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 331.43• ,v PALLET JACK 245285 090810 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. 331.43 = 339117 911612010 121536 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 9 Business Unit VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,750.00 ACTIVITY GUIDE DESIGN 245412- 00100813 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS - PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 166.29 SIGNAGE 00001532 245287 388022 -001 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 166.29 338124 9/16/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 832.02 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005183 245464 88397 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 832.02 339126 9/16/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,009.00 245350 533799 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,009.00 1,750.00 339118 9116/2010 120227 HARTSHORN,BOB 561.99 REIMBURSE FOR SUPPLIES 245413 090210 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL 561.99 339119 911612010 123146 HAUTH.ENTERPRISES . 575.00 PETTING ZOO - BARNYARD BOOGIE 245211 090810 1600.4390.49 BARNYARD BOOGIE 575.00 339120 911612010 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION, 104.23 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 245462 21086234 1190.6105. DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 156.00 SILS /CAL SUPPORT 245463 21086235 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 260.23 339121 9H6/2010 101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 741.47 AUG 2010'BOOKING FEES 245286 3218 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES 741.47 339122 911612010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 944.78 LAPTOP FOR PW 00004360 245212 48181301 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 830.42 PC & LCD FOR:INTERN 00004361 245213 48204205 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 239.40 PRINTER PART FOR SR CTR 00004351 245579 47950399 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,014.60 339123 911612010 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES' INC. SENIOR CITIZENS - PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 166.29 SIGNAGE 00001532 245287 388022 -001 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 166.29 338124 9/16/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 832.02 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005183 245464 88397 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 832.02 339126 9/16/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,009.00 245350 533799 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,009.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 339126 9/16/2010 339127 9/16/2010 Subledger Account Description CHEMICALS REPAIR PARTS 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 10 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 339128- 911612010 100828 JERRY S FOODS CITY OF EDINA - Council Check Register 1.95 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 5.40 448.64 ACID FOR POOL 00002162 245465 10082437 5620.6545 448.64 GENERAL'SUPPLIES ELECTION 14.40 105894 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTENANCE I 245214 97.79 . ELEMENTS 00005101 245288 25143 1553.6530 97.79 19.38 Subledger Account Description CHEMICALS REPAIR PARTS 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 10 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 339128- 911612010 100828 JERRY S FOODS 1.95 245214 083110 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5.40 245214 083110 1180.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES ELECTION 14.40 245214 083110 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 19.38 245214 083110 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 20.20 245214 083110 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.88 245214 083110 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 26.69 245214 083110 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.87 EDINA ART CENTER 245215 081810 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 167.77 339129 9/16/2010 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 40.09- 245216 083110 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.90 245216 083110 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5.11 - .245216. 083110 _ 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL .5.96 245216 r 083110 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 6.05 - 245216 083110 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 12.44 245216 083110 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 14.80 245216 083110 1401.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 25.34 245216 083116 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 32.00 245216 083110 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 34.77 245216 " 083110 - 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 49.56. 245216 083110 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 66.80 245216 083110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 74.34 245216 083110 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE - 106.34" . 245216 083110 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 149:74 245216 083110 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 264.90 245216 083110 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES. DISTRIBUTION 522.01 245216 083110 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, GENERAL MAINTENANCE 537.76 245216 083110 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 846.04 245216 083110 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,717.77 c; R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 11 9116/2010 -9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 339130 9/16/2010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 368.71 TIME CARDS 245517 24102 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 368.71 339131 9/16/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,667.80 245351 1423541 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 403.55 245466 1428309 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6,858.65 245548 1423549 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,930.00 339132 9/16/2010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO 39.48 WEED SPRAYER 00001504 245217 55650945 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 299.25 FUNGICIDE 00006307 245467 55424145 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 338.73 339134 9116/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,551.01 245352 1905238 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,075.12 245353 1905236 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 315.36 245354 1905232 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,126.48 245355 1905237 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 245356 - 1905225 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.11 245357 1905234 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 667.04 245358 1905233 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,606.92 245359 1905235 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,667.68 245360 1897092 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 100.00- 245361 470562 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100.00- 245362 470564 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 100.00- 245363 470563 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 516.26 245549 1905222 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 657.27 245550 1905221 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 464.83 245551 1905220 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 864.65 245552 1905224 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 170.31 245553 1905223 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,668.08 245554 1905230 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1;131.13 245555 1905227 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,406.90 245556 1905228 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,714.68 245557 1905231 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,834.02 245558 1905229 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 112.12 245559 1905226 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 27,273.09 339136 9/16!' 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2.68 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5112.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER POTTERY 8.99 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 17.72 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 28.95 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 37.84 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 64.84 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 145.77 PETTY CASH 245289 090810 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 306.79 339136 9116/2010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 99.87 UNIFORMS 00003771 245518 146294 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 539.96 UNIFORMS 00003774 245519 146920 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 691.94 UNIFORMS 00003782 245520 146603 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 173.14 UNIFORMS 00003771 245521 146294 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 147.96 UNIFORMS 00003780 245522 147290 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.97 UNIFORMS 00003781 245523 147347 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.99 UNIFORMS 00003781 245524 147347 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,953.83 339137 9/16/2010 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 450.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 208250 032509 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 450.00 339138 9/16/2010 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 168.00 AUG 2010 SERVICE 245290 090110 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 339139 9116/2010 101936 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 394.79 PRO LASER III SERVICE 245218 424982 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 394.79 339140 9/1612010 126929 LAKE IMPROVEMENT CONSULTING LL 443.75 POND TREATMENT 245468 1014 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 443.75 339141 9/16/2010 127146 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. 113.37 PLAYGROUND PARTS 00001505 245219 M77258 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 113.37 339142 9/16/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 162.39 TOOLS 00001503 245220 9538966 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.01 WASHERS, TERMINALS 60005037 245291 9552211 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 9/16/2010 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 245221 090810 1554.6230 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 51.10 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 419.35 LOCK NUTS, PINS, FITTINGS 00005037 245292 9552210 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 115.29 CONNECTORS, METAL SCREWS 00001664 245293 9556884 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.83 WASHERS 00005562 245414 9252189 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 849.87 9/16/2010 101371 MACHOLDA, ED 339143 9/1612010 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 87.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 245295 2,895.41 SAND 245469 090110BRAEMAR 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL 8 ROCK 2,895.41 339149 9/16/2010 339144 911612010 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 925.00 ACTIVITY DIRECTORY DESIGN 245415 #4 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 925.00 376.54 CARPET CLEANING 245527 W28215 339145 911612010 100858 LOGIS 850.03 1,147.00 339160 245294 32650 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,565.50 245294 32650 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 2,893.00 091010 245294 32650 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,983.00 245294 32650 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,023.00 245294 32650 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,086.00 245294 32650 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,883.50 245294 32650 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 339146 9/16/2010 126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 245221 090810 1554.6230 51.10 339147 911612010 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 424.94 DISINFECTANT CLEANERS 00003797 245525 2396 1470.6511 424.94 339148 9/16/2010 101371 MACHOLDA, ED 87.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 245295 090810 1600.6107 87.50 339149 9/16/2010 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 473.49 JANITORIAL SERVICE 245526 C005065 7411.6103 376.54 CARPET CLEANING 245527 W28215 7411.6103 850.03 339160 9/1612010 127236 MARTIN, MYRON 115.86 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 245528 091010 5900.2015 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 13 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CLEANING SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CUSTOMER REFUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE --ET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/1612010 — 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 14 Business Unit ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 115.86 AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 339151 911612010 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 1,200.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 245416 7057 1550.6121 1,200.00 339152 9116/2010 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 54.00 COSTUME FOR "IN EDINA" 245417 090910 2210.6406 54.00 339153 9/16/2010 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,898.00 COMMONWEAL THEATRE TRIP 245296 090310 1628.6103.07 2,898.00 339164 9/1612010 101987 MENARDS 179.02 FOUNTAIN REPAIR PARTS 00001494 245222 14502 1647.6530 19.23 BROOM 00002376 245297 16674 5630.6406 198.25 339155 9116/2010 100890 MIDWEST AQUA CARE 1,690.00 LAKE DYE TREATMENT 00001613 245418 ARROWHEAD8 /10 4086.6103 4,839.00 WEED & ALGAE TREATMENTS 00001612 245419 080810 4086.6103 4,306.00 WEED & ALGAE TREATMENTS 00001261 245420 INDIANHEAD8 /10 4086.6103 2,490.00 WEED & ALGAE TREATMENT 00001611 245421 MELODY8 /10 5933.6103 13,325.00 339156 911612010 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 490.02 SOAP 00001502.245298 176813 1552.6406 490.02 339157 9116/2010 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 96.00 MLS ACCESS FEE 245470 1627301 1190.6105 96.00 339158 9/16/2010 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 17,877.51 WATER PURCHASE 245223 090210 5913.6601 17,877.51 339159 9/1612010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 19.95 CO2 245471 R108100121 5421.6406 37.44 CO2 245529 R108100254 7413.6545 57.39 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 14 Business Unit ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 15 9/16/2010 —9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339160 9/1612010- 102770- MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 123.75 CASTERS, YOKES 00001424 245299, 7071 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.75 339161 9/16/2010 120051 MINNESOTA FIRE.CHIEF MAGAZINE 80.00 DIRECTORY LISTING 245530 60048 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION. 80.00 339162 911612010 105430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY 2,231.36 ARMS 00005981 245300 M58824 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,231.36 339163 9/1612010 126997 MISSION ELECTRIC LLC 823:00 LIGHT FIXTURES 00008020 245472 082710 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 823.00 339164 911612010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS &SERVICE GROUP 265.67 SENSORS 00001426 245473 483905F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 265.67 339166 9116/2010 102396 MOSE, WILLIAM 25.50 WRAP UP MEETING 245531 091310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 25.50 339166 9116/2010 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 2,118.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 245474 78150856 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,118.39 339167 9/16/2010 106729 MOWER COUNTY - - 485.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 245301 090710 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 485.00 339168 911612010 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 PSAP MONTHLY SERVICE 245224 80251977 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 339169 9/1612010 105575 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO. INC 166.08 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 1600.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 180.38 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.38 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 5510.6575 - PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 180.38 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 245364 8273587 -IN CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,125.93 245365 8273581 -IN Council Check Register COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,051.75 245366 8273572 -IN 9/16/2010 -9/1612010 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100674 PENHALL COMPANY 180.38 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 5621.6575 PRINTING 00001531 245304 53811 180.38 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 5631.6575 PRINTING 225.47 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 1629.6575 PRINTING 360.76 2010 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 245422 23998 5410.6575 PRINTING BARNYARD BOOGIE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,654.21 339170 9116/2010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 42.79 THERMAL ROLLS, SPRAY. MOUNT 00006034 245475 - 1251199506 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.03 GOLF PENCILS 00002365 245476 .. 531229018001 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.82 339171 9/16/2010 100936 OLSEN.COMPANIES 70.87 CHAIN & CLEVIS HOOKS 00005135 245302 . 607606 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 21.70 CABLE 00002371 245303 607394 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.57 339172 9/16/2010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 134.23 COOKIES 245477 80155671 5421.5510 COST -OF GOODS SOLD 134.23 339173 9/16/2010 124647 PAIGE CONSTRUCTION INC. 300.00 VARIANCE REFUND 217924" 072209 1140.4361 PLANNING FEES 300.00 339174 911612010. " 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 49.60 RACK " 00006093 245478 254261 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.00 339176 9/16/2010 100347 PAUSTIS 8: SONS 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 16 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION ADAPTIVE RECREATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ` GRILL PLANNING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 826.03 245364 8273587 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,125.93 245365 8273581 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,051.75 245366 8273572 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,003.71 339176 9/16/2010 100674 PENHALL COMPANY 275.00 SAW CUT 00001531 245304 53811 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 275.00 339177 9/16/2010 127228 PERKINS MEDIA 200.00 BARNYARD BOOGIE 9/18_/10 • 245305 DJ DANCE 1600.4390.49 BARNYARD BOOGIE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 200.00, R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF-EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount 'Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No; Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339178 9/16/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 157.04 245367 2960021 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,010.11 245368 2960020 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 645.60 245369 2960016 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,474.82 245370 2960022 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 23.67- 245371 3443719 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4.84 245372 3443718 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 245373 3443715 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING . 98.24 245374 3443717 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 53.12- 245375 3443716 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,685.91 245560 2960019 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD -WINE YORK SELLING 802.41 245561 2960017 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,567.36 245562 2960018 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 343.84 245563 2960015 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 1,065.83 245564 2960014 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10,565.05 339179 ..911612010 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 1,257.33 PIPE, GASKETS 00001534 245423, 0055341 -IN 5921.6406 '" GENERAL'SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,257.33 339180 9/1612010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 245225 090810 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 339181 9/1612010 106152 POWERPLAN 128.68 PUMP, SEAL 00001366 245226 P58324 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.68 339182 911612010 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 30.31 FILTERS 00002328 245306 150758 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS. CENTENNIAL LAKES 59.88 MOWER PART 00002367 245307 150704 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES" 128.52 MOWER PARTS 00002338 245308 151234 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 59.88 MOWER PART 00002367 .245309 152091 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 278.59 339183 9/1612010 100966- -PRINTERS SERVICE INC . 54.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008019 245479 249326 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 54.00 339184 9116/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 18.60 245376 353227 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 18 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 615.20 245377 353226 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,564.80 245378 352804 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,160.24 245379 353313 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 705.75 245380 352805 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,838.80 245381 353228 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 591.20 245382 353229 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 300.47 245383 353315 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 168.80 245384 352806 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,176.14 245385 353314 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12,140.00 339185 9/16/2010 123898 OWEST 55.92 245227 082810 5911.6186 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.62 245227 082810 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 113.66 245227 082810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 117.32 245227 082810 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 166.05 245227 082810 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 192.33 245227 082810 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 234.92 245227 082810 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 256.41 245227 082810 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 266.59 245227 082810 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,057.44 245227 082810 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 18.60 651 281 -1355 245310 1355 -9110 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 292.46 612 E24 -8656 245311 8656 -9/10 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 5204 612 E24 -8657 245312 8657 -9/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 606.52 612 E01 -0426 245313 0426 -9110 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 E12 -6797 245314 6797 -9/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 520.19 612 E01 -8392 245315 8392 -9/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 182.29 952 926 -0419 245316 0419 -9/10 1646.6188• TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 52.28 952 926 -0092 245317 0092 -9/10 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 6,318.88 339186 9/16/2010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 245318 812 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,009.25 339187 9/16/2010 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 25.50 WRAP UP MEETING 245532 091310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 25.50 339188 9/16/2010 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 141.50 URINAL REPAIR 00002376 245424 12378 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 - CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 141.50 339189 9/1612010 124678 REAL ESTATE COMMUNICATIONS GRO - 99.00 2010.OFFICE SUMMIT 245533 358 -42855 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 99.00 ' 339190 9116/2010 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 106.21 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 245320 725000001242 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 249.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 245320 725000001242 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 356.16 339191 911612010 - 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 156.50 SHOWER REPAIR 00006096 245480 55659 5420.6180" CONTRACTED REPAIRS 156.50 339192 911612010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 74.55, SOFTENER SALT 00003648 245534 00240221 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.55" 339193 911612010 114687 ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY BAND 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/1/09 225210 112009 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 339194 9/16/2010 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS " 961.88 OAK WILT TREATMENTS 245481 43298 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 961.88 339195 9/16/2010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 CLEAN PARTS WASHER 00005138 245321 922704734 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 331.06 RECYCLE PARTS CLEANER 245535 51467869 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 444.13 339196 9/16/2010 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 58.54 BAKERY 245482 291490 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 58.54 339197 911612010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 21.36 101= "" "9350 245536 091010 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES , 35.43 101= •"•"9350 245536 091010 - 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 56.79 339198 9116/2010 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page- 19 Business Unit ASSESSING GENERAL MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE CLUBHOUSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OR COURSE & GROUNDS GRILL PLAYGROUND & THEATER VANVALKENBURG R55CKREG LOG20000 9.25 CITY OF EDINA 339204 9/16/2010 120784 SIGN PRO Council Check Register 59.32 EDINA 18 SIGN 245425 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 GENERAL SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 911612010 252.10 WEED CONTROL SERVICE 00001605 245228 1833 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1.155.12 TEST ALARM & SPRINKLER 00002144 245484 252.10 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE 1.155.12 339199 9/16/2010 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF `' 339206 911612010 127237 SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY 54.75 STICKERS 245322 SH1077 5822.6575 PRINTING 1057 2210.6406 54.75 STICKERS 245322 SH1077 5862.6575 PRINTING 109.51 STICKERS 245322 SH1077 5842.6575 PRINTING 219.01 492.97 STRESS RELIEVERS 245539 , 425618 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 339200. 9/1612010 492.97 119799. SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 339208 9/16/2010 25.50 WRAP UP MEETING 245537 091310 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25.50 .,. 339201 9/16/2010 124114 SCNS SPORTS FOODS 56.40 FOOD 00006344 245485 30768 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD .56.40 339202 9116/2010 104689 ' SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 2.655.20. CUSTOM SIGNAGE 245483 41452 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2;655.20 339203 911612010 116971 'SEVERSON, GAYLE F 9114/2010 9:56:19 Page - 20 Business Unit GENERAL TURF CARE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ' EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 9.25 , ELECTION JUDGE .174195 111407 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9.25 339204 9/16/2010 120784 SIGN PRO 59.32 EDINA 18 SIGN 245425 4204 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.32 339206 911612010 106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 1.155.12 TEST ALARM & SPRINKLER 00002144 245484 73796190 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE 1.155.12 339206 911612010 127237 SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY 150.00 MONITORS 245538 1057 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 339207. 9/16/2010 '119716 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. 492.97 STRESS RELIEVERS 245539 , 425618 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 492.97 339208 9/16/2010 101004 SIPS COMPANIES COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 120602 TEAGUE, CARY CITY OF EDINA 5900.1735 9/14/2010 9:56:19 421305.6710 84.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Council Check Register 090810 Page - 21 84.00 9/16/2010 — 9/16/2010 -- 122794 TENNANT SALES AND Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7,320.83 .28.60 SOLDER 00001668 245323 S2254187.001 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER 00005720 28.60 900900546 14,641.65 MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER 00005720 339209 9/16/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 339216 9/16/2010 1,868.90 TAX ON INVOICE SM10272 00005974 245229 SM10272TAX 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT 00001486 1,868.90 10 -777 -993 3,970.00 339210 .9/1612010 339217 9/16/2010 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 154.00 188.19 DOOR PARTS 00001257 245230 MN- 541228 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 245488 188.19 339211 911612010 102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 121.84 LIQUID FERTILIZER 245486 3093 -RGR 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 121.84 339212 9116/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 35.00 WIRELESS REPAIR SERVICE 245324 28224 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 339213 9/1612010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 646.00 245386 MVP01503 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 339214 9/16/2010 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 120602 TEAGUE, CARY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS 421305.6710 84.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 245325 090810 84.00 339215 9/1612010 -- 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMP 7,320.83 MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER 00005720 245326 900900546 7,320.83 MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER 00005720 245326 900900546 7,320.83 MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER 00005720 245326 900900546 14,641.65 MODEL S30 RIDER SWEEPER 00005720 245326 900900546 36,604.14 339216 9/16/2010 113549 TENNIS WEST 3,970.00 RESURFACE BASKETBALL COURT 00001486 245231 10 -777 -993 3,970.00 339217 9/16/2010 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 154.00 245487 00772364 284.90 245488 606923 438.90 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT UTILITY BALANCE SHEET STREET EQUIPMENT PATHS & HARD SURFACE 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 513.50 CITY OF EDINA 339223 9/16/2010 Council Check Register 9/16/2010 - 9/1612010 00006326 245491 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339218 9/16/2010 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 9/1612010 126032 UNI-SELECT USA 283.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 245327 2010 -42998 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 083110 1553.6530 283.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 245327 2010 -42998 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 283.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 245327 2010 -42998 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 850.00 317.57 UNIFORMS 245329 339219 9/16/2010 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 391.96 UNIFORMS 245329 083110 1400.6203 216.82 COPIER USAGE 245540 159455344 7410.6575 PRINTING 216.82 339226 9/16/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 339220 9116/2010 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 8.41 SHIPPING CHARGE 00003136 245492 090810 1400.6406 10.45 SPRING 00001421 245328 LC00000714 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10.45 339227 9/16/2010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 339221 911612010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 681.08 TINES, COLLAR 245489 JI35133 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS 922.91 ROLLER 245490 SI24599 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,603.99 339222 9/16/2010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 22 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PSTF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 513.50 PRE - EMPLOYMENT TESTS 245426 101700789 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 513.50 339223 9/16/2010 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 550.41 SEED 00006326 245491 23869 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 550.41 339224 9/1612010 126032 UNI-SELECT USA 1,090.70 PARTS 245580 083110 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,090.70 339226 9/1612010 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 317.57 UNIFORMS 245329 083110 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 391.96 UNIFORMS 245329 083110 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 709.53 339226 9/16/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 8.41 SHIPPING CHARGE 00003136 245492 090810 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.41 339227 9/16/2010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Council Check Register Page - 23 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30.00 CUST43805514 245493 083110 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 473.97 CUST43805514 245493 083110 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 4,454.87 CUST 43805514 245493 083110 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 4,958.84 339228 9/16/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 841.04 WRENCHES, CS FITTINGS 00001538 245330 224258 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 841.04 339229 9/16/2010 100050 USPS- HASLER 6,000.00 ACCT #75983 245331 090810 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,000.00 339230 9/16/2010 102909 VADNAIS, SCOTT 450.00 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 00001615 245494 00080310 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 450.00 339231 9/16/2010 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 59.80 OXYGEN 00003649 245427 825387 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.80 339232 911612010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 255.98 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001587 245232 171779 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 170.82 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 245541 171924 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 426.80 339233 911612010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 290.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 00006097 245495 50923 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 47.79 SHIFT CABLE 00006322 245496 50501 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 337.79 339234 911612010 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 278.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00008018 245497 146308 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 278.00 339235 9116/2010 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 322.00 NITRILE GLOVES 00001500 245233 255124 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 86.95 GLOVES, FLASHLIGHTS 00001500 245234 255136 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10.24- CREDIT 00001115 245235 255107 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 398.71 339236 9/16/2010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,270.91 BULBS 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 1,270.91 VERNON SELLING 339237 9/16/2010 VERNON SELLING 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 143.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 143.96 YORK SELLING 339238 9/16/2010 YORK SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,098.15 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5421.5514 1,504.75 GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,602.90 5862.5514 339239 9/16/2010 5842.5514 101312 WINE MERCHANTS YORK SELLING 5842.5514 1,150.67 YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7 065.67 5862.5514 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/16/2010 - 9/16/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00001141 245498 15158381 -00 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 245332 090810 1646.6201 245387 250725-00 5862.5513 245565 250722 -00 5842.5513 245388 331284 5862.5513 245566 331283 5842.5513 245567 331282 5822.5513 339240 9/16/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5,926.50 245389 453065 71.83 245390 453066 1,053.33 245391 453062 1,796.60 245392 450254 10,114.06 245393 453059 1,472.56 245394 453064 198.62- 245395 808891 395.75 245568 454127 6,243.37 245569 453067 26,875.38 339241 9/1612010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,699.43 245396 653764 1,985.60 245397 655125 406.20 245499 653566 502.00 245500 656116 120.00 245570 654532 442.25 245571 656335 3,572.50 245572 656334 3,532.30 245573 656095 1,561.38 245574 653786 100.00 245575 653787 15,921.66 LAUNDRY 9/14/2010 9:56:19 Page - 24 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING •R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 339242 9/16/2010 CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Register 9/16/2010 -9/16/2010 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 2,306.90 245398 253888 5862.5513 1,085.45 245399 253890 5842.5513 171.90 245576 253889 5822.5513 339243 9/16/2010 101726 •XCEL ENERGY 4,611.81 51- 6621207 -1. - 245236 -. 251788625 2,187.60 514013604 -6 ', - 245237 251827353 1,569.12 ..a 5176840050 -6. 245238 252291026 31.26 51- 7567037-0 245239 251802391 28.62 51 -4151897 -6 245240 251752862 932.29 51- 6137136 -8 245241 251780979 1,235.42 51-6979948 -4 245242 251961281 1,644.68 51- 6979948 -4 245242 251961281 2,192.73 51- 6979948 -4 245242 251961281 14,433.53 339244 9/16/2010 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 168.90 AUG USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 245243 049985369 35.08 AUG USAGE, BLDG /ENG 00004322 245244 049985368 203:98 339245 9/1612010 118028 YAHOO] CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 20.44 DISCLOSURE REQUEST 245245 159722 20.44 339246 911612010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 702.17 GAS 00006403 245502 996109 565.09 GAS 00006403 245503 996111 788.56 DIESEL 00006404 245504 996110 2,055.82 339247 9/16/2010 127234 ZYLKA, DOUGLAS 76.76 CLOTHING PURCHASE 245501 090810 76.76 419,491.72 Grand Total 5913.6185 5913.6185 5921.6185 1321.6185 1646.6185 5430.6185 5821.6185 5861.6185 5841.6185 1550.6151 1550.6151 1400.6103 5431.6581 5424.6406 5431.6581 5422.6406 Subledger;Account Description COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS`SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER" LIGHT& POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 9/1412010 9:56:19 Page - 25 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 5071-1 ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES - GASOLINE Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 419,491.72 Total Payments 419,491.72 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE RANGE' RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKSUM __�20000 CITY �.NA_ Council Check Summary 9/16/2010 = 9/16/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 88,280.13 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,671.32 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 13,049.90 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 56,026.71 05100 ART CENTER FUND 995.04 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 34.77 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,957.13 05500_ ICE ARENA FUND 2,874.92 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 7,773.71 05800 LIQUOR FUND 135,345.53 05900 UTILITY FUND 46,157.04 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,151.78 05950 RECYCLING.FUND 37,683.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,490.74 Report Totals 419,491.72 We confirm to thenbest of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll ies and procedur"te . �r lFinaryceZirector 91, -10 9:56:59 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 7/27/10 - 8/25/10 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/07/26 $41.69 YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/07/29 $39.30 YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/07/29 $10.00 YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/07/29 $185.86 YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/07/29 $600.00 YOUTH SUMMER PROGRAM THREE RIVERS ADMINISTR/ 763- 5599000 MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/07/30 $552.47 EQUIPMENT LEASE PAYPAL *BOUNCEONAIR 402 - 935 -7733 CA JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/04 $416.52 SAFETY CAMP DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/04 $134.09 SAFETY CAMP FASTFOTO & DIGITAL - N MINNEAPOLIS MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/09 $537.00 POOL LICENSE JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, 800 - 742 -8720 TX JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/11 $471.94 SOCKS VISR WWW.VISR.NE' NC JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/12 $35.00 ATHLETIC ASSN AWARDS EDINA LIQUOR 50TH EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/13 $130.42 YOUTH SUMMER PROGRAM DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/13 $26.81 ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES. MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/16 $35.00 ATHLETIC ASSN AWARDS EDINA GRILL EDINA MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/16 $35.00 ATHLETIC ASSN AWARDS JJ'S CLUBHOUSE GOLDEN VALLE MN JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/17 $39.00 LICENSE THE PRODUCTIVITY PRO 1 303 -471 -7401 CO JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/21 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL JUNE PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/24 $27.62 EQUIPMENT RENTAL JULY PITNEY BOWES INVOICE 800 - 228 -1071 CT JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/24 $27.62 EQUIPMENT RENTAL AUGUST PITNEY BOWES INVOICE 800 - 228 -1071 CT JEFF LONG 2010/07/30 $107.26 PRINTER BEST BUY MHT 00002816 RICHFIELD MN JEFF LONG 2010/08/06 $159.31 TEST MONITOR SUPERCIRCUITS INC 512 - 3729348 TX JEFF LONG 2010/08/15 $160.90 PRINTER OFFICE DEPOT #415 EDEN PRARIE MN JEFF LONG 2010/08/18 $106.52 CONFERENCE ZAPEVENT 612 - 548 -5648 MN JEFF LONG 2010/08/20 $106.52 CONFERENCE ZAPEVENT 612- 548 -5648 MN DEB MANGEN 2010/07/27 $57.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN DEB MANGEN 2010/07/27 $15.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX ST. LOUIS PAR MN DEB MANGEN 2010/07/30 $13.18 ICE CREAM JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN DEB MANGEN 2010/08/05 $25.60 GROCERY STORES,SUPERMAW TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN Page 1 1624.6406 1624.6406 1624.6406 1624.6406 1624.6406 1624.6406 1600.4390.06 1600.4390.06 5310.6103 5621.5510 4077.6406 1624.6406 1629.6406 4077.6406 4077.6406 5621.6104 5621.6235 5621.6235 5621.6235 1400.6160 1400.6406 1400.6160 1400.6104 1400.6104 1180.6406 1180.6406 1513.6103 1180,, ZP K $8,781.44 Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po cies and Aj it (0- [to — ager CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 7/27/10 - 8/25/10 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/02 $153.78 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/13 $90.00 CONFERENCE MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/13 $90.00 CONFERENCE MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155 MN 1400.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/13 $1,228.02 DIGITAL CAMERA & ACCESSRYS NATIONAL CAMERA TENT S. GOLDEN VALLE MN 2210.6710 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/17 $173.96 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/18 $287.97 PORTABLE HARD DRIVE B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 800 - 9479950 NY 2210.6711 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/19 $1,249.87 DATA STORAGE ARRAY AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6711 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/19 $71.40 HEALTH CONFERENCE MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEAL 651-2014499 MN 1490.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/19 $20.00 WELLNESS PROGRAM JERRY'S FOODS . EDINA MN 1513.6218 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/20 $488.95 WESTERN DIGITAL HARD DRIVE AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6711 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/23 $125.00 HEALTH. CONFERENCE CRAGUNS'LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD MN 1490.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/24 $70.00 CONFERENCE MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/24 $100.00 CONFERENCE MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 651- 2962155 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/25 $499.00 SAMSUNG HDTV AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6711 $8,781.44 Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po cies and Aj it (0- [to — ager /-k O, G -V� Cn 1 �0 ,aea REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V11. A. DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion ® Information Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. RECEIVED Susan Howl wlsp 7 ?nln To: Edina City Council I was dumbfounded to learn that Section 3 of the trail options would sacrifice the highly used pedestrian sidewalk on Lincoln Drive. It covers one mile from Caribou Coffee to the stoplight at Lincoln /Vernon /Gleason. Surely you jest. This popular concourse is used daily, in all weather, by residents of adjacent homes and housing complexes - also serving employees of United Health on Lincoln Drive. As I ride my bike almost daily on the adjacent roadway, it pleases me to see so many people of all ages walking, running or exercising their dogs. To put cyclists, pedestrians and dogs -on -leash on a common path, with increased 2 -way traffic and no divider is a recipe for disaster. This increased risk would surely dissuade older pedestrians, who are now among its greatest users. The backup option - section two - is better only because section 3 is so bad. Unfortunately its proposed route in back of United Health would destroy native trees and compromise the fragile wetlands along the Creek with elevated boardwalks. It would cross Vernon /Gleason at the stoplight. This is not only a very busy intersection, but serves as a shortcut for rush hour traffic (2:45 - 5:45pm) of motorists from Opus, United Health, and 169 south seeking quicker access to Vernon, Gleason and Crosstown east. I pass through this intersection twice daily, and consider it risky, even with a semaphore. Bike trails are important, but they are not an imperative when weighed against their consequences and against the abundance of bike trails which already exists. Bredesen and Normandale Parks each offer double two mile loops - one for bikes and one for pedestrians These one -way bike loops are much safer overall than the proposed trail. A short trip by bike or car to Hopkins will allow access to two long distance trails -- the LRT South which extends to Shakopee; the LRT North to Lake Minnetonka, continuing to Victoria. The Three Rivers Park District, which would operate the proposed trail through Edina, already operates 62 hiking /biking trails on 14 different sites, including nearby Bryant and Hyland Lakes. So why is another trail necessary, particularly when it would cost some $35 million, intrude on public and private land and increase the possibility of accidents with its numerous intersections? As a serious cyclist who has logged over 150,000 miles since moving to Edina in 1967, I am skeptical of the claim that the proposed trail would be used by half a million cyclists per year. April to October is a generous measure of weather conducive to cycling. In those 5 months an average of 100,000 cyclists per month would be needed to claim 500,000 per year. That factors to an average of 3,333 per day. Since most families can only cycle on weekends, that average would have to be boosted for Saturday /Sunday. In my experience, that volume would discourage use of the trail by families, who should be the primary objective of a park trail. Don't overlook -- Bike purchasers overestimate use. Just check any Edina garage. Trail advocates also overestimate use in their enthusiasm for trails. Congestion and stop signs are deterrents to trail use, but weather is the biggest factor. As Minnesotans know, good weather is often at odds with weekends. Surely there is a better use of $35 million than this intrusive trail through Edina neighborhoods. Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely, Robert J. Wilkins 6612 Scandia Road Edina MN 55439 952- 941 -3732 Email: mlwpacewsw @aol.com 2 Robert D. Lucas Heidi S. Schellhas 6106 Waterford Court S. RECEIVED Edina, Minnesota 55436 SEP 16 2050 September 10, 2010 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina — Section 3 Dear Mayor Hovland:. . We write to request that the City not adopt Section 3 in the Three Rivers Park District proposal. We strenuously believe that Section 3 in the Three Rivers proposal would be a poor choice for all of the reasons stated below: 1. The Section 3 route is very dangerous. We sincerely believe that a pedestrian, bicyclist, or both, will be seriously injured if this route is adopted. Section 3 contemplates that pedestrians and bicyclists will essentially use the same path just a few feet apart. As frequent dog- walkers, we observe that even now heavy traffic levels and fast vehicle speeds create safety concerns for sidewalk pedestrians. 2. The sidewalk fulfills a genuine need for pedestrians (and their dogs), which will be lost if a multi -use trail replaces the sidewalk. 3. We understand that more than 1,800 cars will cross the proposed Section 3 route every day, because approximately 700 homes, a business with 1,100 employees, and a church are located in proximity to the proposed Section 3 route. 4. Nineteen roads_ or driveways cross the proposed' Section 3 route. Bicyclists will be required to stop at 19 stop signs, one for each proposed Section 3 route crossing. Each stop creates a risk of accident. Based on our personal experience, we feel that not all bicyclists will obey these stop signs, greatly increasing the risk of bicycle - vehicle and bicycle- pedestrian accidents. The Honorable James Hovland September 10, 2010 Page Two We ask that the City of Edina select the proposed Section 2 route, a far safer route than the proposed Section 3 route, for the location of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina. ry truly yours,' Robert D.:Luc Heidi S. Schellhas Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50'h St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Nine Mile Creek Trail Dear Mayor Hovland, RECEIVED September 15, 2010 SEP 16 [010 Parks were set aside to be used and enjoyed by everyone ... not a select few. We can leave no greater legacy to future generations then to expand a park system that provides access to outdoor recreation to all and at the same time protects and improves vital natural areas. We have the opportunity now with the proposed Three Rivers Park District walking and biking trail along Nine Mile Creek in Edina. I have walked the entire length of Nine Mile Creek that flows through Edina. In many places it is just a drainage ditch. The creek is on the state's impaired water list because its muddy flow doesn't support the fish species that a creek of this type should. Nine Mile Creek Watershed is proposing to restore Nine Mile Creek through the City which may include constructing gentle curves thus making a natural habitat for fish and wildlife. If a Creek -based trail route is chosen, the Park District and Watershed District will collaborate efforts and conduct stream restoration in conjunction with trail construction. The staff at Three Rivers Park District are professionals in designing paths that are ecologically sound as well as taking into account and respecting near -by homes. I have biked most of the existing Three Rivers Park District Bike and Walking Trails. Along the way I have observed deer, turkeys, ducks, egrets, song birds and a turtle laying her eggs all living in harmony with the trail. The trail would provide safe and convenient biking and walking routes connecting homes to work places, schools, recreation and shopping. The proposed path through Edina is a critical part of a larger regional trail system, connecting the western suburbs and beyond. Is the City of Edina going to have the path stop at its borders thus making us an island? Some have proposed that the trail be put on city streets. Biking on streets creates a safety problem and the recreational value would be lost. Public health advocates urge us to get more exercise. " Many studies show that people living in walkable neighborhoods walk and cycle more for recreation and transportation and are less likely to be obese ". (Jim Sallies, Director of Childhood Obesity Prevention Group) The Three Rivers Park District reports that there are typically six Police Officers and six PSO's on duty at any given time within the park district. These numbers can vary day to day, depending on special events. The Park District has not had any violent crimes such as rape, robbery or assaults occur on the Park District Regional Trail System. The Park District will use a variety of funding sources to pay for the development of the proposed trail including its own bonding authority, regional grants from the Metropolitan Council, State grants and Federal grants. "Each year Edina residents pay more than 3.5 million in taxes to the Three Rivers Park District yet the City Of Edina has no trails or other district owned park facilities within our borders ". (Star & Tribune, January 31 st, 2009) If we don't act at this time to approve the Three Rivers Park District path proposed along Nine Mile Creek in Edina, it will be a lost opportunity to improve the lives of future generations. I urge your support. Respectfully, Steve Sando (68 year Edina resident) 5133 Juanita Ave Edina, MN 55424 (952) 927 -7830 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please distribute to City Leaders RECEIV PEE D SEP T 2010 From: Yedda Marks [mailto:yedda @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:20 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please distribute to City Leaders TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager Honorable Mayor James, Hovland Council' Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann,.Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner., Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Cary Teague, Planning Director Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director FROM: Yedda S. Marks, 4508 Garrison Lane, Edina, MN 55424, 952 - 926 -6083 As a resident and taxpayer in Edina, I strongly encourage you to amend Edina building code, 850.11 Section H. The current 1 -foot elevation height restriction may be applicable in some neighborhoods (e.g. Country Club and South Harriett Park), but is restrictive and a detriment to many other neighborhoods. I support reasonable building ordinances that protect historical neighborhoods and the architectural integrity of new building, but 850.11 Section H is too limiting and extreme. It does not take into consideration problems with much of the aging housing stock and irregular lot issues with a large percentage of homes in Edina. Instead, I would suggest that you amend the code to include language previously suggested by City Planner, Cary Teague to read, ".....The first floor elevation may be raised 'up to four feet, only if it is necessary because of high ground water or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements." Please consider my request. Sincerely, Yedda S. Marks Susan Howl Subject: FW: Park Dedication Fee RECEIVED - - - -- Original Message---- - SEP 1 From: Mark Guettler [ mailto:mark_guettler @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 9:38 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Park Dedication Fee Edina City Council Members. Please vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and Tax Incremental Financiing for the Colonial Church Waters Project. I am opposed to any type of tax payer subsidy for this project. Regards, Mark Guettler 5920 Olinger Blvd Edina Police Department recognized for going `Above and Beyond' in support of employ... Page 1 of 1 CURRENT PRESS RELEASES Edina Police Department recognized for going 'Above and Beyond' in support of employees in military Edina, Minn., June 19, 2008 -- The Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) division of the federal Department of Defense recently recognized the Edina Police Department with an "Above and Beyond" award for its unfaltering support of their employees who also serve in the military. Gov. Tim Pawlenty presented the award to Edina Deputy Police Chief Jeff Long and other members of the Department on May 12. The Edina Police Department was one of 27 employers in Minnesota honored with the "Above and Beyond" award at the Minnesota State Committee for ESGR Annual Awards Banquet held at the Golden Valley Country Club. The Department was recognized specifically for their support of two Police Officers, Port Security Specialist Kevin Rofidal and Boatswain's Mate Brandon Kuske, who both serve in the Coast Guard Reserve and were called to duty last fall after the I -35W bridge collapse. "Within minutes of the bridge collapse, we had most of our personnel deployed at the scene assisting the City of Minneapolis or on -duty in Edina," said Rofidal. "Over the next four days, even though the Police Department was stretched thin, we were given complete support to fulfill our obligations to the Coast Guard. Without hesitation, our colleagues and supervisors filled schedules and covered shifts on a very short- notice. "The fact that they [Rofidal and Kuske] are in the military serving our country in addition to their work as police officers shows that they are the ones going 'Above and Beyond., "' said Long. "It may sound clich6, but the least we can do Is be flexible and supportive when they are called to duty." ESGR was established in 1972 and its members have been working to gain and maintain employer support for members of the Guard and Reserve by recognizing outstanding support, increasing awareness of the law and resolving any conflict between employer and employee through mediation. According to ESGR Chairman and retired Brigadier General Dennis Schulstad, "It's important to remember that the military would not be able to handle homeland defense and emergency response without the Guard and Reserve. It requires a great deal of sacrifice not only from the individuals in service and their families, but also the employers who have to continue working when an employee is called to duty. The Edina Police Department has always been really cooperative and makes it very easy for these men and women to do their work for the military." For more information, contact the Edina Police Department at 952 - 826 -1610 or visit the ESGR website at www.esgr.org. http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / pressreleases/ L6- 42_PressRelease_200806_07.htm 9/15/2010 Susan Howl From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum.julie @gmail.com] F ECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 3:48 PM SEP 16 2010 Subject: FW: Waste to Energy Program for Oct. 7 RSW Meeting Would you please give this article to all city council members and Mayor Hovland? Wood smoke is a serious, ongoing and burgeoning issue. I urge all city officials to read this and think independently about the toxicity of burning wood along with garbage on top of it. Thank you. Wood fired power stations = bad Matthew I Sepielnher 1.1. 2010 at 4 :1.; In;i Pollution. Science j 1 :RI,: ht1.p: / /wp.me /pGVPe -8i Here's a simple equation: wood fired = bad Read "Don't Send Forests to the Furnace" by the Australian newspaper Green Left Weekly. In December 2009, the Massachusetts Medical Society, publisher of the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, announced a policy opposing wood -fired power station proposals on the grounds that "biomass power plants pose an unacceptable risk to the public's health by increasing air pollution ". And let me remind you if you mistakenly believe that burning wood is "carbon neutral" because trees grow back that extra methane is released into the atmosphere, the wood needs transporting to the plant by diesel belching trucks, and if you cut down a 400 year old tree, unless you plant another 400 year old tree in its place, there is 400 years of being in carbon deficit. Let me also remind you that wood smoke is toxic. It's mutagenic and carcinogenic. i.e. woodsmoke causes cancer and can cause mutations in the next generations. Woodsmoke should be minimised in the air we breathe to reduce the risk of cancers, especially lung, mouth and throat cancers in the general population. Hydro (where appropriate), geothermal, wind, photovoltaic, solar concentrators, tidal, microgeneration = good Coal, diesel, natural gas, and burning biomass = bad 1 Miller— Carrina 4509 Garrison Lane OO Ldina, MN 559-29- O 952.926.4839 September 16, 2010. TO: Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council. Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson FROM: Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino RE: Background on Pending Planning/Zoning Issue The attached information is for your background only. No doubt the issue.in some fashion will eventually make it to your formal agenda, so we are providing this to you in preparation for future discussion. Last night we attended the Planning Commission's open house meeting where we added our opinions - again— regarding changes we believe should be made to Edina City Code 850.11, Section H restricting first floor height elevations to one foot. We have been opposed to this city code amendment since its first and second readings in November of. 2007 because it creates a host of dilemmas for us and potentially others including the need to go through the variance process. Now, with the Minnesota Supreme Court ruling (Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka) our variance request and anticipated building project can't go forward. In addition to the meeting last night, we have also attended and commented at the formal Planning Commission meetings, a work session with City Council and Planning Commissioners on Sept. 7, a Planning Commission work session on Sept. 8, and have had extensive correspondence and discussions with Planning staff. The documents attached are copies of initial correspondence with staff and then a summary presentation we intended to show at the open house with photos. The equipment didn't work so,we were unable to visually present our case. A few other important points: Although we are frustrated with the situation, we have no complaints with Planning or other City staff. Kris Aaker, Cary Teague and Heather Worthington have been responsive, professional and resourceful. The City of Edina is fortunate to have them on staff. We hope the Planning Commission will consider what the League of Minnesota is recommending, "that cities should revise building codes to avoid variance requests." After last night's open house, we believe they have some options to consider including language with provisions added to aforementioned code or creating conditional use permits for certain situations. Both options were discussed. We were encouraged that at last night's open house, there were no objections to changing the first floor height restriction from other residents who attended and who were candid in comments about agenda items. Its important to us that ou understand this correspondence today is truly for your background. We respect the process and are hopeful the Planning Commission with appropriate input from Planning staff will find a solution. And, in turn, when.the City Council receives the proposed solution that it will be a thoughtful and solid one for everyone involved: Thank you for your time and review of the information. Miller — Carrino 45og Garrison Lane* E-dina, MN 55424 O 952 9 bS 26.4839 ......................... ............ ..... .......................... . F.^'+l 2Lt+ f/. iSf27f+ 4L �iY/ 0?SSi59SSSYfiDYLALiFiWiMSY3rHfI. i9ttl A25Y• ii/. YJ4MS9KHAY• Si34�ii iiS4G4G#/ rC�iYX6�1G4I .'FR!!lA'F69WeG7Ci-0OWd'ri S{ SS20MLW". AGLS9Y6SR' �SSS% d99Ci1 r94. iirFFF. iSfdS' CY. S'H+L4NY //�PY•i94f9LLM99K9Lii7` .. August 10, 2010 Ills. Kris Aaker Assistant Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Kris: Thank you for your continued assistance and guidance over the last several.months as we pursue a major property improvement project to teardown our 1959 walkout rambler located at 4509 Garrison Lane. In light of the recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision regarding — specifically, restricting— building variances, the purpose of this letter is to: 1. Seek your advice and direction for next steps in our project— realizing you may need to consult with the City Attorney, we have sent him a copy of this letter also (see below). 2. Provide additional background you and others may need about our project. 3. Request that you and the City Attorney consider our case and suggestions. Background We hate to bore you, Kris, with more and repetitive background on our project, but since we are sending this letter for you to discuss with Roger Knutson we thought it would be helpful so you both have the full picture. Our current house is located in a very modest area of Edina. Since 1995 we have been considering what to do with our house, initially gathering information on remodeling and then comparing remodeling vs. a teardown. Over the years we've sought advice from remodeling contractors, new home contractors and real estate agents. Because our house would require such an extensive amount of remodeling, the advice from experts in 2005 was that we should wait to see what happened with the real estate market particularly in our area which is south of the Country Club and South Harriett Park /Halifax areas where most of the major remodeling and teardowns were being, done -at the time. They thought, and we agreed, it was important to wait since we would be the first major undertaking on our block and within a several block radius. Meanwhile, we continued to watch the market, review information, investigate potential contractors, and analyze our decision for the best timing. Late in 2007 we thought we were ready to move forward and were planning on a start date of spring 2008. At that point, we knew our project was beyond a modest remodel and would require a teardown. Then the City of Edina decided to make changes in the building code restricting the height of first floor elevations to address some residents complaints regarding oversized rebuilds. For numerous reasons that you will read about below, this ordinance amendment created problems for our intended project. Then, the economy took another downward spiral so we decided to wait a little longer. All these delays for best timing meant some large home repairs were put on hold. In November of 2009 our roof started leaking in several places so we knew we had to do something —no more waiting! We We chose College City for several reasons including that they are advanced in green- building techniques and; if possible, we want to build a certified green home. In addition, we wanted a builder who wouldn't give us ideas for a towering, seven - figure home placed in our modest neighborhood— something we believed would meet the intent of concerns addressed through Edina's Massing Taskforce. In November of 2009 we started formally working on our plans. our goals from the beginning have been to: Build a certified green home that utilizes sustainability and universal design integrity =a home that should.never need to be re -built on this lot; - Build a home that is void of the numerous problems we've struggled with for more that 18 years including mold, mildew (resulting from high water table on our lot) and energy inefficiencies; - Build a'home that complements and blends in with the neighborhood, preferably another walk -out rambler (what our neighbors would also prefer), this time using,a prairie- influenced architectural style (e.g. 4/12 low - profile roof); - In keeping with our desire to be "green ", have the current house moved for resale vs. demolished which helps reduce landfill material; - And, avoid the variance process if possible. We would probably have already submitted our application for a building permit if it weren't for our final goal of avoiding the variance process. This has been quite problematic for several reasons, including: - The curve of the street creates inconsistent set -backs which, in turn, creates design "pinch points" A very irregular shaped buildable footprint resulting in numerous design challenges A high water table that has resulted in flooding of our walkout level (several episodes following the super storm in 1988) and ongoing mold and mildew from a foundation that sits on a high water table. And a pond'in the backyard where the normal water level has only recently been identified. In July we, along with our builder, had finally whittled away at our new home design so that it would require just one variance request. We have,been diligent in working to eliminate the need for any variances arising from the unusual aspects of our lot as described above. After at least 12 design revisions we have overcome the need for what could be considered convenience variances for front setbacks, side setbacks, or overall lot coverage. The onlytremaining issue —the first floor elevation —is a variance needed to eliminate health and safety hardships of the current dwelling. Nearly ready to submit our variance request, we learn about the Minnesota Supreme Court decision based upon Krummenacher vs. City of Minnetonka that has forced all municipalities including the City of Edina to halt variance requests. So.... here we are in limbo again, pre - approved for a construction loan (at an interest rate we could lose if we don't start our project soon), waiting with our leaky roof for someone to make sense out of this legal and legislative chokehold. Making Our Case Instead of waiting for legislature to hear and consider the ramifications of the court ruling, we would ask the City of Edina to look at other options suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities including revising its own building codes that are creating the need for variance requests. We can't speak to other 2 requests, but the one that is restricting our project is the City's decision in 2007 to revise Section H. Edina City Code 850.11 and restrict the height of first floor elevations. Back on November 20 2007, we attended the City Council meeting that was scheduled to discuss the first floor elevation. Unfortunately, also on the agenda that evening was public comment for a proposed building moratorium. We did speak about the elevation issue and added our opinion not supporting a moratorium, but the discussion of the elevation issue was little compared to the moratorium. You can confirm our testimony in the minutes /video on record (see http://Mmm.cityofedina.com/departments/—WatchaMeeting.htm go to Archives, City Council; November 20, 2007; click on video; choose Jump to Testimony by Jeff Miller, resident; or, counter number 01:08:34) As a follow -up to that meeting, we sent a letter that was referenced in the second reading of the proposed Ordinance on December 4. In those meeting minutes or by watching video of the meeting (see counter 02:26:18), you will find that City Council members and Cary Teague, Planning Director, specifically discussed our letter and situation with an elevated flood plain. Instead of even considering that the revised code /new ordinance was a problem, the Council moved forward with the new ordinance noting that "a variance would be needed whether they remodel, requested an addition or did a tear down .... that it is a condition where the flood plain would qualify as a hardship." Clearer the City Council and Planning Department defines flooding and potential flooding as a hardship. We agree. Still, if the City did not have such an awkward building code that specifically restricts building on the first floor elevation, then we would not need a height - related variance. Our problem requiring a first -floor height variance is due to several factors: A high water level, the backyard (between the house and pond) has a minimal slope (in essence a flat yard), and we only have 7 -foot ceilings restricting the reasonable use of primary square footage. NOTE: In addition to ongoing mold and mildew, we have evidence of the high water table from when we added a deck in 2002 and hit water when digging the footings. The high ground water level along with the 7 -ft ceilings creates the following problems or hardships: - Previous floods /water in the lower level and potential future floods - Health and safety issues from ongoing mold and mildew from foundation condensation 7 -foot ceilings limit the use of the space for things like exercise equipment. (Try to find even a treadmill with a flat platform so that a 6 -foot plus man doesn't hit his head when jogging is impossible.) Therefore, we would need to apply for a height variance that would: A. Add one foot to the foundation height to solve the high water level and flat topography of the lot, and B. Add one foot to the ceiling height from 7 -feet to 8 -feet to allow for usable space. Note: Most new homes being built have 9 -feet ceilings on the walkout level, we are only asking for 8 -feet. And, C. Accommodate the extra inches for current building techniques (current truss systems need more height than outdated joist systems used in 1959). Furthermore, with our intended prairie- influenced design with a low- profile roof /pitch, we do intend to be at least 10' feet under the overall height restrictions for the house, yet we simply want to be able to have full use of primary square footage on the walkout level. After all we are taxed on full use of square footage. The current height restriction on the first floor elevation is limiting and has created ongoing design delays. There's just no way around seeking a variance request for the first floor elevation needed to build an improved and structurally sound walk -out rambler. On the other hand, we recognize that we could, in fact, build a new structure with a 7 -foot ceiling height walkout level, and then add two additional floors above, still complying with the overall height limit. That design option absolutes would not fit the character of the neighborhood (primarily walk -out ramblers, ramblers and a few split- entries) and our most direct neighbors would unequivocally be against such a 3 structure. We do not blame them. It would look repulsive. And, we believe it absolutely is not the intent of the massing taskforce. In the Supreme Court ruling it stated that "unless and until the Legislature takes action to provide a more flexible variance standard for municipalities, we are constrained by the language of the statute to hold that a municipality does not have the authority to grant a variance unless the applicant can show that her property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance." In our case, if the litmus test or question is "Can the property be used in a reasonable manner without a variance ?" We would answer NO. We currently cannot use primary and taxed square footage due to all of the points mentioned above nor could we rebuild unless we can increase the foundation and first floor height. Yet, others would argue that we do or can use the space; more specifically, "they" would argue that we should just make do. To most folks, there's a huge difference between reasonable use and making do. What is unclear is the definition of "use." It's a he- said - she -said argument and no one wins. Reasonable use, therefore, becomes a gray and nebulous determination and is only in consideration because of the City of Edina's building code. Again, we do not wish to go beyond the overall height restriction, but we do need to increase first floor elevation. The additional guidelines required for determining reasonable use include hardship factors. - The first factor The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. We believe, as stated above, that we have a valid case here, but again this is a subjective determination. The second factor: landowner's problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner. Again, the term unique is extremely vague and subjective.. Still, we would hope that not all Edina homes have mold and mildew problems created from foundation condensation and flooding issues. So, to say that our property has unique problems not caused by us is, we believe, accurate and meets the second hardship factor. The third factor. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. This is what is. crazy: Granting the variance absolutely would NOT alter the character of the home, street, neighborhood. YET, we could proceed without a variance and build something that meets the code and is totally out of character. Next Steps — Please Advise Quite honestly, Kris, we feel paralyzed, tentative and unsure. We have waited over two years for the right timing on our project and now our house is in serious need of repair (leaking roof, insulation, driveway, windows, kitchen with inoperable appliances, the list goes on). We hope that the City of Edina will expediently explore alternatives to its current building codes instead of waiting for the snail -paced legislative and judicial processes. The case that led to the Supreme Court ruling took over two years of legal maneuvers. Supreme Court cases can't be overturned. Legislative action takes even longer. It's not unreasonable to conclude that it could be YEARS before this legal mess is defined. For any city to wait is a detriment to progress and revenue. The League of Minnesota Cities suggests four responses for cities. We hope the City of Edina will consider the fourth response: "Cities may want to build .greater flexibility into their existing conditional use permit, planned unit development and setback regulations to explicitly afford greater latitude to allow "variance -like" approvals under the zoning code. For instance, a city might establish alternative setback requirements to allow for construction that is consistent with neighborhood attributes." We would ask the City of Edina to consider "tweaking" Section H, Edina City Code 850.11 perhaps by detailing 4 exceptions or alternatives to the first floor elevation criteria which would eliminate our need for a variance and the ability to move forward. We ask that you provide us with advice on next steps. Specifically we wonder. Will.the City and Planning Commission consider our variance request? If yes, can the City Attorney provide legal counsel /guidance to the Planning Commission that a variance request would be approved? We simply can't risk waiting another year if the variance is declined. Or,.will the City Council consider amending the aforementioned ordinance? If yes, what is the anticipated timeline for resolve? Or, to borrow a phrase from the Honorable Mayor Hovland, does the City of Edina have any other "tools in its toolbox "? We are most willing to meet with you or others as needed. Thank you again, Kris, for your patience and guidance throughout our potential project to date. Best regards, Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino CC: Roger Knutson, Attorney, City of Edina Cary Teague, Planning Director, City of Edina Darin Pavek, President, College City Design Build Bjorn Freudenthal, VP Sales & Marketing, College City Design Build 5 M 9-509 Garrison sane 0 r dina, MN 55+2-+ The Situation — Residents' Perspective ❑ 2007 begin serious. consideration process: Remodel vs. rebuild vs. move? ❑ Project Goals: o Certified green home; avoid current water problems; build to new standards; design to complement neighborhood with low - profile roof ❑ December 4, 2007 Edina amends city code 850.11, Section H with F elevation increase limit • Continue to review plans want to avoid variance process • Spring 2010 move forward with teardown plans need one variance on first floor height ❑ June 2010 Krummenacher halts variances M -+509 6arrisonLanc 0 E_Jina, MN 55-+2-+ The Situation — City's Perspective ❑ League of MN Cities suggests cities should revise building codes to avoid variance requests ❑ City staff presents realistic solution/revision to Planning Commission for 850.11 Section H ❑ _Planning Commission not supportive, suggest residents go for variance ❑ City Attorney reluctant and advises against variance process i 9-509 Garrison sane 0 r Jana, MN 55+2+ Project Status - Pickle in the Middle ❑ Miller- Carrino caught in pickle: Indefinite hold! ❑ Krummenacher AND City Code problematic ❑ Proceed with variance? Risk litigation? ❑ Wait for legislature? Can we really wait THAT long? NO MR , .-' MOP - g gg M �M? SIR " MW Val" -M W� , .1 , i'� M. a M Ed M RM er� a-rrino. +509 Garrison Lane O E_Jina, MN 55 424 Proposed S Fact - Based - Approach oarh ❑ Edina should revise Code 850.11 Section H ❑ Does not reflect real world building situations [:i Considerations & Contradictions: 1. Aging Edina housing stock, ubiquitous ramblers means remodels/teardowns should encourage use of valuable lower level square footage. YET Building code restriction of F on first floor contradicts and prohibits. this consideration. 2. Better lower level/basement utilization reduces need for= adding second stories and overall height; helps maintain architectural character —an ideal, solution to the overall intent of the massing task force. YET Building code contradicts and prohibits. 3. Green construction techniques use new growth timber trusses vs. previous use of old growth 2" x 10" floor joist. YET building code M 4509 C arrison Lane Q �cina, j�N 559-29- Fact Based Approach: Elevation Increase Logic Assume worse case — 6'6" lower level ceiling height • Edina requires basement with 8' ceiling ❑ + 116" • Encourage use of new growth floor trusses — 18" verses 2 ❑ + g» x 10" construction • Allow 1' foundation increase for homes in flood zone, ❑ + 1' high ground water issues or minimal grade • TOTAL ❑ + 3'2" ❑ Based on facts, the increase from 1' to 4' suggested by the City Staff is reasonable and defendable when used in conjunction with existing City Code for height, setback and runoff -4 11! ; "What tools do we have in the tool box?" The Honorable Mayor James Hovland We whole-hearted-ly, agree with Mayor Hovland's quote -and approach: How can-city government solve city problems with new considerations, new tools? Answer-. Move beyond the status quo of bureaucracy and consider new approaches, ideas and tools. We encourage his approach to this variance problem so that we and -other Edina residents can expeditiously move forward with redevelopment plans. Thank you, Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino Susan Howl From: RayVoss@aol.com mai Ito: Ra Voss @aol.com Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:22 PM To: Lynette Biunno SEN 1 4 fli0 Subject: Park Waiver request for Shelter Corp. project Honorable Mayor Hovland_ and. City Council Members: I just learned that you folks are in the process of formally considering the request of Shelter Corporation for a waiver of the Park Impact Fee and that you are also considering a request from them for TIF money to help finance this project. Please do NOT approve these requests. There is no reason why this organization should receive preferential tax treatment for this development. The land „itself has been tax free for years, That alone should be more than sufficient tax subsidy for them. Also there is no reason why a waiver should be granted for the park impact fee. The people who will be living in this facility are quite likely to use the parks nearby. In fact, the parks will probably be among the amenities used to promote, the project. And whether they use.the parks themselves, you can be assured that their guests, relatives and friends, children and grandchildren will use the parks. Just because someone is "old” doesn't mean that they won't use the parks. In fact, today, a person who lives in that area was out walking and visited our home along the way. She is older than me and I'm 69! There is nothing that sets this development apart from any other commercial development in terms of its impact on the. park system and al[the reasons why the City requires a park impact fee should apply here. Finally, it is just not fair to further burden the taxpayers of the neighborhood and of Edina generally with subsidizing this commercial development. There will be no "rent breaks" or any other "preferences" specifically for Edina residents interested in living there, so there is no justification for any tax breaks, either in terms of TIF funding or in a full or partial waiver of the park impact fee. Thank you for your attention to this e-mail. Raymond Voss Mailing; address: 5021 Vernon Ave. So. #312 Edina,. Minnesota 55436 Residence address: 5716 Benton Ave. Edina, Minnesota 55436 952- 927 -0448 rayvossi 46I.com 1 4 SEP 14 Z019 From: Steve Wallschlaeger [mailto:swallschlaeger @lifetouch.com] Sent: Monday, September 13,2010 3:01 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation requests Importance: High I am under the understanding that there is' a request from the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation, to waive the Park Dedication fee and provide TIF,money for this project. This project is not a benefit to the community at large and there is absolutely no reason why any kind of taxpayer subsidy should be allowed. I vehemently oppose the waiverof the Park Dedication fee and providing TIF funding and as a resident of the countryside neighborhood and the.city of Edina, I ask that you vote NO to these proposals. Steven J. Wallschlaeger 5621 Dale Ave Edina, MN 55436 Steve Wallschlaeger Swalischiaeaer@lifefouch.com I Senior Operations Manager - Field Operations I Lifetouch National School Studios I 11000 Viking Drive Eden Prairle, MN 55344 ( 952.826.5749 (office) 1 612.432.2997 (cell) 1 952.826.4833 (fax) Before printing, please Think about the environment This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http• / /www.messapelabs.com/email 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please Vote NO for waiving the Park Dedication Fee SEr 14 E From: rkrustad @comcast.net [mailto:rkrustad @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:07 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please Vote NO for waiving the Park Dedication Fee Please vote no on waving the park dedication fee. - - - -- Original Message - - - -- [, °P From: Elizabeth Jensen [mailto :elizabeth.jensen @comcast.net] SE P X14 Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:03 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corporation It has come:to my attention that Shelter corporation is requesting waivers,on. the park fee and looking for additional taxpayer subsidies. PLEASE vote NO ...... as a member of the Countryside community, I am opposed to this development. If Shelter Corporation plans to build move forward, they should be responsible for the park fee and TIF monies. Thank you, Elizabeth Jensen 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: No Tax Waiver SEP 1 4 L�ii� From: O'Shaughnessy, Eileen [mailto: Eileen. O'Sha ug h nessy@hcmed.org) Sent: Monday,, September 13, 2010 2:51 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: No Tax Waiver s Please do not allow the Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church a waiver on the Park Dedication Fee. A waiver is granted if`it is in the best interest -of the project and would benefit the neighborhood. There was a lot of opposition to this plan. This commerical project;already has gotten too many -concessions from this neighborhood, do not allow them to benefit further. This project will greatly benefit from the park (at.the expense of the neighborhood). They should certainly pay their share of taxes. Eileen O'Shaughhessy i Susan Howl Subject: FVH. SEP From: Dorothy Pool [mailto:dorothy @q.com] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: vote no on 9/13/10. This is all so illegal... Wrong from Dorothy Pool Susan Howl Subject: FW: Living Waters - Park Fee Waiver From: Christine Henninger [ma I Ito: Christine. Hen ninger@genmills.com] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:42 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Living Waters - Park Fee Waiver SEP 14 1060 Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members, I am writing to express my opinion regarding the proposed waiver of the park dedication fee and public financing requested by Colonial Church and the Living Waters Senior Development. I would respectfully request that you vote no ' to both requests. All residents of Edina pay this fee through their property taxes, regardless whether they personally utilize any particular park within the City of Edina. Living Waters is a commercial enterprise wanting to do business in the City of Edina, and they should be subject to the same fees and taxes as any other taxpayer. I personally find it offensive that they would even request such a waiver, considering the fact that the City has already amended their comprehensive plan and approved a rezoning change in order to accommodate their development plans. Edina's lovely parks and green spaces are what brought many of us to invest in homes in Edina, and all residents should be expected to support them, including the future residents of Living Waters. Furthermore, the request for public financing I find to be equally unsupportable. As you know, this project does not have universal support within the City of Edina, the neighborhood, or among the members of the City Council. In light of the other negative impacts I believe that will result from this development (traffic, loss of green space, change in neighborhood character, parking problems), to provide taxpayer money in support of this project seems unfair and fiscally irresponsible. I appreciate your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place 952 - 920 -1931 Christine Henninger General Mills, Inc. Tax Counsel Ph. 763-293-3734 Fax 763 - 293 -2841 SEP 1 4 c10 From: Lane Barton [mailto:LaneBarton @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:38 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corp Colonial Church To the Honorable Members of the Edina City Council, If Shelter Corp is granted a waiver and TIF then I want my property taxes reduced by 50 %. The Colonial project is a private profit seeking project that the owners must bear the financial burden of, not the tax payers. Just say NO to a waiver and TIF money. Lane Barton 6800 Limerick Lane Edina, MN 55439 ` 952 - 944 -5438 I Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Housing SEA' 1 ': 'LVIO From: Kerzner, Lawrence J [mailto: Lawrence. Kerzner@hcmed.org] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:28 PM To Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Housing Dear Persons, I write to inform you of my strong opposition to any waiver of park dedication fees for the Shelter Corporation's Waters Senior Housing project and any tax increment financing. I urge you to disapprove what I understand are requests by Shelter for these. This for profit venture should not be provided tax supported subsidies. Residents of the facility will have full access to park facilities.' Shelter should share in the costs associated with maintaining all city infrastructure. Sincerely, Lawrence J. Kerzner 5828 Jeff, Place Edina, MN 55436 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee From: philb [mailto:philipjbohrer @yahoo.com] SEI L�I� Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:39 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: Vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee PLEASE vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and the say no to allowing any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. Colonial Church and Shelter Corp should pay the fees and taxes they owe. i Susan Howl Subject: FW: TIF money for Waters. Project ECEb SEP 1 2010 From: Kathy Dahlheimer [ mailto:kdahiheimer @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:17 PM To: Lynette Biunno . Subject: TIF money for Waters Project To City council: Please take a serious look at TIF financing for such a project. Not only is.the project not welcome in the neighborhood but it should not be subsidized by tax payers. These places are`for profit and believe me they make lots of- money. Also that project will do nothing to property values in that area but take them down. Please vote against any tax breaks for this project. Thank you. Kathleen° Dahlheimer 41801 West 60th Street Edina Susan Howl -rom: Home [mailto:mvidele @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:23 AM c E. To: Lynette Biunno ,k� i Subject: Shelter Corps. Intent NOT TO PAY Taxes Edina City Council, As an Edina resident living within the Countryside Community, I am continually disgusted with Shelter Corp /Colonial Church regarding their position on the fiscal needs stated in the below paragrah..l not in support of Shelter Corps /Colonial Churchs self -fish position to be waived from fiscal liability associated with the Park Dedication Fee and any TIF... As stated by Shelter Corp, they believe their reasons for not paying this tax is two fold: 1. That their residents won't be using the park. 2. The Watersproject does not benfit the Enitre community I Disagree, their whole position for building this project is to provide a residence for people within EDINA and from other neighboring cities, how much more community benefit can it be then that; besides what about when friends, family, grandchildren come to visit their Seniors they going to be told by "The Waters" staff "DO Not go in the Park because we are not paying for it ", no, they will use it; accept "WE" the Countryside Community will have to pay for the park, while Shelter Corps /Colonial Churchs reap in more profits, supporting their self -fish position to be absoloved of any of these Taxes. If Shelter Corp is stating that this project is GOOD for the Community then they should be equally contributing their portion of taxes to keep the community as wonderful as it is today ... THEY DON'T feel this way, simply by not wanting to pay for iti! So I see they don't care for the Countryside Community or any community because they do not want to help pay for it ... PERIOD! As Council members representing me and the Edina citizens, what do you support and believe is right? Should Shelter Corp /Colonial Church get a free ride or partner with the community and pay their EQUAL share of taxes... How is that fair to us who live here? As a representative of the PEOPLE who live here, your obligation is to us and your action speak louder than words Mark Videle Countryside Resident We were just informed that Save the Countryside Group and Greater Edina Neighborhoods should be alerted that there is going to be a City Council Meeting on Monday, 9113 at 5 PM where Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation will be requesting the waiver of the Park Dedication fee (expected to be $750,000) and Tax Incremental Financing(or TIF money, or taxpayers dollars). The Park Dedication fee Colonial Church /Shelter Corp should pay is about $750,000 and the TIF money is only supposed to be allowed when it benefits a entire community. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS MEETING, MONDAY, 9113 at 5 PM at City Hall and share your concerns, and /or EMAIL THE CITY COUNCIL AT edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us and ask them to vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and the say no to allowing any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. Colonial Church and Shelter Corp should pay the fees and taxes they owe. Remember some 600 property owners greatly impacted by this large complex don't want this large complex in their neighborhood to begin with, and now they potentially may have to subsidize it on top of it with taxpayers dollars. Is this fair? Susan Howl Subject: FW: Park Dedication Fee and the Shelter Corporation From: joswan0l @aol.com [mailto:joswan0l @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:01 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Park Dedication Fee and the Shelter Corporation It is my strong conviction that the city council should vote NO to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and any other tax breaks or subsidies for the Shelter Corporation as it moves ahead with developing its site on Colonial Church property. As retired people, we seldom use the city parks as younger residents and families would. Nonetheless, living in a community that values parks and green space is important to me and knowing that others can use them has added value. To me, it is part of being a good citizen. I am not able to comprehend why others who live in this community should not be given the same privileges and responsibilities. Contributing towards the maintenance and care of the park system is part of an Edina resident's responsibilities. It is neither fair nor moral to ask for an exception. Should an exception be granted, their portion of these taxes will be passed on to other residents. This is blatently unfair and irresponsible - both on their part for asking and yours should you grant their request. Joanna Swanson 7. Susan Howl SEP i 3 LU19 Subject: FK Colonial Church / Park fee From: St. Pierre Associates [mailto :john @stpierreassociates.com] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:03 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: Colonial Church / Park fee We have a prior commitment Monday evening 9/13 and will be unable to attend the City. Council Meeting. We respectfully request that Colonial Church /Shelter Corp pay the Park Dedication fee. It's impossible to believe that the occupants and /or their families will not utilize a park directly across the street from the facility. We're not aware of the reasoning for approving previous requests waiving the fee, but wedo not agree with the entire concept. The developers should support the city if they wish to receive a financial gain by locating in the community. We are required and willing to support Edina'Schools even though our children have grown,and moved out of Edina, why should a corporate entity be treated any differently ?' John & Jeanne St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane Edina, MN jst.pierre @comcast.net i Susan Howl SEE 13 HIO From: John.Harden [mailto:JHarden @hardeninc.com] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:17 AM To:. Lynette Biunrio Subject: Please forward to the Mayor and Council 'I understand that there is going to be .a City Council Meeting today where Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation will be requesting a waiver of the Park Dedication fee and requesting Tax Incremental Financing for their Waters project. The development; partnership is asking for a waiver of. the:Park .Dedication Fee because it is unlikely that residents will avail'themseIves of Edina's parks. Frankly, most of us don't use the parks, but we pay the taxes to, support.them We don't ask for special consideration. Residents of the rental apartment complex will have a. grand view of Countryside'Park,.and a short walk to Bredesen Park. They should pay to support the parks, and the city, the same as everyone else. In fact, they should., pay more because they will be destroying the view for everyone using the park. As for TIF, this project was sold and bought by the majority of the Council it seems — as the greatest thing ever to happen to Edina. Why then, should it require a public subsidy? This is a project that was forced upon the Countryside neighborhood against its wishes, and now Colonial and Shelter want us to subsidize it? This is exactly the concerns we expressed and, we feel, are just the beginning of requests for handouts. If this project is everything it was sold as, and if Colonial and Shelter Corp is truly the "good neighbor" they have promised, then they should participate fully with the rest of the neighborhood, pay their fair share and stand on their own two feet like the Countryside Neighborhood tax payers. John Harden 5829 Jeff Place Susan Howl Subject: FW: Park - the new path at Bredesen SEP 13 209 From: Craig Jarvinen [mailto:jarvinen @aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:12 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Park - the new path at Bredesen The new surface at Bredesen is wonderful! However, it is now under the thick coating of leaves, stick and logs. I was on the trail yesterday and must report that it is again a hazardous trail. The leaves trap water; together is an extremely slippery surface. The sticks go right into spokes. Due to the trees along the trail, I think it needs frequent sweeping. Also of note, there a few areas of the trail that need better drainage. These locations can be easily identified by finding the mud covering the new path surface. Craig Craig ]arvinen 4113 Chowen Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55410 phone: 612-321-8488 e -mail: jarvinenCabaol.com 1 Page 1 of 1, Gordon Johnson SFP 1 1 11110 From: Gordon Johnson [gjjohnson3 @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:06 PM To: 'JHovl and @ci.edina.mn.us';'SHoush @ci. edina. mn. us' ;'ASwenson @ci.edina.mn.us';'Mary Brindle'; 'JBennett@ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Park Dedication Waiver - Shelter Corporation Dear Mayor and Council Members: I understand'that there will be a meeting at 5:00 pm tomorrow afternoon at City Hall to consider a request from Colonial Church and Shelter Corporation to request (a) a waiver of the park dedication fee for their development and (b) TIF funds for the development of the project. Was an appropriate advance notice provided to the citizens of Edina inasmuch as the participation by the five of you surely constitutes a public meeting? What difference is there between the notice requirements for this meeting and the notice requirements for the recent meeting to interview and /or select the new city manager? Over the years that I have had some involvement with the City of Edina, I have no recollection of any previous requests by developers to waive the park,dedication fee applicable to their development. I strongly oppose the waiver of any portion, or all, of the fee applicable to the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation for several reasons: (1) the granting of such a request would only open the floodgates to every other developer or homeowner to request a similar waiver on the grounds that they wouldn't be using the park system. There have been no objections (at least publically) by developers or subdividers in the past. (2) our park system is short on funds at the moment and this particular fee could go a long ways toward completing the Countryside Park update much earlier than the present plans espoused by John Keprios and (3) while I might feel that a nonprofit organization could receive some reduction from the full fee described by ordinance, I don't have that feeling in this case. Both Shelter Corporation and the new corporate entity created by Colonial Church are clearly "for profit" organizations! I haven't researched the records [I just found out about this request meeting], but I don't recall any public dissemination of information regarding such requests from Edina Park Plaza, 7500 York, Walker Elder Suites and other organizations in the community that could probably claim that they wouldn't "use" the parks. Second, and again without research, I would also oppose the use of TIF funds on the grounds that there is no general city-wide benefit to be gained from the use of TIF monies. The only benefit is received directly by either Shelter Corporation or the new Colonial Church corporate entity. In my opinion, that potential use is beyond the intended scope of the city's ordinance. Therefore, I urge all of you to (a) hold a properly - scheduled meeting with public notice and (b) vote NO on both the park dedication fee waiver and the use of TIF funds for this project. Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 -1937 9/12/2010 Susan Howl Subject: FW: September 13 Council Meeting SEP 13 2110 From: SWOtteson @aol.com [mailto:SWOtteson @aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:39 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: September 13. Council Meeting I am not able to attend the meeting at 5:00 P.M. today but must voice my opposition to an item on your agenda: Please know that I and many, many Edina citizens are opposed to any taxpayer money being used to benefit Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation. They should be required to pay the Park Dedication fee. And in noway can I see justification for TIF financing for their project. I expect our City Council to use our taxpayer money in ways that benefit all of us .... not heeding to requests from special interests. Sabra Whiting Otteson 5704 Continental Drive Edina, MN 55436 952.933.9025 1 r is P: 4J - - - -- original Message---- - From: Jean Wikoff [mailto:djwikoff @comcast.net]. SEP 13 2019 Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 7:51 PM' To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Dear Council Members: I understand there will be a council meeting this Monday, September 13 in which one of the agenda items is Colonial church /Shelter Corporation waiving of the Park:- Dedication fee "and Tax Incremental Financing. As an Edina Taxpayer and Countryside neighbor, I ask you to vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and to say no to allowing any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. " Thanks for putting "residents first." Jean M. Wikoff 6305 Hillside Road. Edina, MN 55436 telephone # (H) 952- 925 -4230 e -mail djwikoff(@comcast.net Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living RECENED SEP 13 X010 From: Sue Keator [ mailto :chickadeedee55 @gmaii.com] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:25 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Sue Keator Subject: Waters Senior Living Sept. 12, 2010 Dear Council Members, It has been brought to my attention that the newly- approved Waters Senior project vows intends to seek a waiver of the park fee. I have heard the reasoning is that the residents will not use the parks. Based on that reasoning, I should not have to pay to support Edina's fine public school system as I do not have children. I also shouldn't have to pay for the parks I don't use. We all know that this Will never happen, however. Paying taxes is a part of life! If I want to live in Edina I must support the schools and parks whether I use them or not. I would strongly urge you to REJECT the request for a waiver of park fees. You probably ought to reject the upcoming request for TIF financing as well. If the project needs taxpayer support to be profitable perhaps it should not be built. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Susan N. Keator 5041 Yvoone Terrace, Edina 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter Corps. Intent NOT TO PAY Taxes , "lig From: Home [mailto:'mvidele @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:23 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corps. Intent NOT TO PAY Taxes Edina City Council,". s; As an Edina resident living within the Countryside Community, I am continually disgusted with Shelter Corp /Colonial Church regardingtheir position on the'fiscal needs stated in the below paragrah..l not in support of Shelter Corps /Colonial Churchs self- fish.position to be waived from fiscal liability associated with the Park Dedication Fee and any TIF... As stated by Shelter Corp, they believe their reasons for not paying this tax is two fold: 1. That their residents won't be, using the'park. 2. The Waters project does not, benfit.the Enitre community I Disagree; their whole position for building.this project is to provide a residence for people within EDINA and from other neighboring cities, how much more':community benefit can it be then that; besides, what about when friends, family, grandchildren come to visit,.their Seniors.they going to be told by "Tfie'Waters" staff "DO Not go in the Park because we are not.paying for it ", no, they will use it; accept "WE" the Countryside Community will have to pay for the park, while Shelter Corps /Colonial Churchs reap in more profits; supporting their self -fish position to be absoloved of any of these Taxes. If Shelter Corp is stating that this project is GOOD for the Community then they should be equally contributing their portion of taxes to keep the community as wonderful as it is,today ... THEY DON'T feel this way, simply by not wanting to pay for iti! So I see they don't care for the Countryside Community or any,coImmunity because they do not want to help pay for it ... PERIOD! As Council members representing me and the Edina citizens, what do you support and believe is right? Should Shelter Corp /Colonial Church get a free ride or partner with the community and pay their EQUAL share of taxes ... How is that fair to us who live here? As a representative of the PEOPLE who live here, your obligation is to us and your action speak louder than words Mark Videle Countryside Resident We were just informed that Save the Countryside Group and Greater Edina Neighborhoods should be alerted that there is going to be a City Council Meeting on Monday, 9113 at 5 PM where Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation will be requesting the waiver of the Park Dedication fee (expected to be $750,000) and Tax Incremental Financing(or TIF money, or taxpayers dollars). The Park Dedication fee Colonial Church /Shelter Corp should pay is about $750,000 and the TIF money is only supposed to be allowed when it benefits a entire community. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS MEETING, MONDAY, 9113 at 5 PM at City Hall and share your concerns, and /or EMAIL THE CITY COUNCIL AT edinamail ci.edina.mmus and ask them to vote no to waiving the Park Dedication Fee and the say no to allowing any other kind of taxpayer subsidy. Colonial Church and Shelter Corp should pay the fees and taxes they owe. Remembe, some 600 property owners greatly impacted by this large complex don't want this large complex in their neighborhood to begin with, and now they potentially may have to subsidize it on top of it with taxpayers dollars. Is this fair? Susan Howl Subject: FW: Countryside neighborhood ECL- "i4 c-U) -- Original Message - - - -- S E P 13 2110 From: Iry & Sherrill Borkon [mailto:IBORKON @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 6:53 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Countryside neighborhood Why is it that there seems to be a lack of regard for the laws that affect the ordinary tax payers but all kinds of allowances are being made for the proposed development of the Colonial church? We have seen enough disregard for the populace on a national level. Let's not get involved with the same chicanery in Edina. It is time to show regard for the many citizens that live in the Countryside area that are opposed to this type of development. You may have the power to act the way have to date but try to be fair in administering that power. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Colonial Church Project SEP 131 to From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:38 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Colonial Church Project I am particularly offended by the idea that Edina is even considering waiving the Park Dedication fees of $750,000 for this project. The idea that this singular project which was objected to by the residence in the area of the project is also being considered for TIF money is even more repungnant. Please vote no to this Public financing of the project. SEP 13 200 From: roy burns [mailto:roybburns @msn.com] Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 11:25 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation Project It is our understanding that the developer of this project is requesting the City to waive the Parks Dedication fee and.to provide Tax Incremental Financing for this project. Since we are long term Edina residents and property owners and are unable to attend the Council meeting, we are sending this e-mail to strongly request that the City Council vote "NO" to both requests! Based on information provided to date, the project is of questionable need, is strongly opposed by a large number of impacted property owners, and certainly does not provide any substantial benefit to the larger Edina community. There appears to be no justification -for any type of taxpayer subsidy from the City of Edina. Please vote "NO "! Thank you for your consideration. Allene and Roy Burns 5708 Warden Ave. Edina, MN. 55436 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Colonial Church and Shelter Corp REECEI ED From: Susan [mailto;spetersen4 @comcast.net] SEP 1 3 l0 i0 Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 1:47 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Colonial Church and Shelter Corp I am outraged that Colonial- Church /Shelter Corp is even asking to waive the $750,000 Park Dedication fee I say no,no this is crazy. I also say no to allowing any other kind of taxpayer subsidy.They are the ones that want to build this complex and the city is rezoning specifically for them which.i,dont agree on. We all have to pay taxes and isnt fair if it waived for them. 1 Susan Howl I ubject: FW: City paid memberships to community organizations .ttachments: publicexpdonationsdues _0809_statement.pdf; ATT26923561.htm RECEIVED Dear City Council members: SEP Z010 I watched a little of the Council meeting last night and the discussion regarding public purpose expenditures related City paid memberships to community organizations. The League of MN Cities has a helpful publication on public purpose expenditures, which can be found at www.Imc.org. The section on Chamber membership with references to the AG opinion is on page 11. The memo says: Minn. Stat. § 469,191 State law authorizes cities "to appropriate not more than $50,000 annually to any incorporated development society or organization of the A o. Op (i (orm, l letter for promoting, improving, or developing the economic and agricultural resources of the city." The attorney general's 1997) (informal letter P g. g' p g' p g opinion to Staples) office has opined that while this authority allows a city to contribute up to $50,000 annually to a chamber of commerce, it does not allow a See Pan III - I — Dues city to become a member of the chamber of commerce, or to pay dues to it. The memo also provides information on dues in general, also on page 11: A c. Op 92-a-30 ( Jan. According to the attorney general, cities cannot join or become members of "private" organizations, absent specific statutory authority - 29, 1986) even if there is s ecific authori to contribute to the organization. And without authorization for membership, there is no authority to pay A. G. Op. (Jun. 27, p ty 1997) (informal letter for membership. However, as noted previously, instead of paying dues, a council may contract and pay for services generally provided by opinion to Staples) an organization if doing so achieves one of council's powers. Minn. Stat. § 471,96 All cities, counties, and towns may appropriate money for membership in county, regional, state, and national associations of a civic, educational, or governmental nature. The associations must have as their purpose the betterment and improvement of municipal governmental operations. This authorization also allows these public entities to participate in the meetings and activities of these associations. Minn. Stat. § 465 58 All cities and urban towns in Minnesota may appropriate money to pay dues to become members of the League of Minnesota Cities. The same is stated in an Office of the State Auditor position, which is attached: Memberships and Dues There is no general authorization for cities to join "private" organizations; but there may be specific statutory or charter authority to join specific organizations. For example, cities and urban towns in Minnesota may pay dues to become members of the League of Minnesota Cities. Similarly, cities, counties, and towns may appropriate money for membership in county, regional, state, and national associations of a civic, educational, or govemmental nature. These associations must have as their purpose the betterment and improvement of municipal governmental operations. This authorization also allows public entities to participate in the meetings and activities of these associations. The Attorney General's Office has determined that local units of government may not pay dues to a local chamber of commerce. However, because cities may appropriate up to $50,000 to an incorporated development society or organization for promotional activities, a city could contract with a local chamber of commerce for one of the purposes authorized by statute, such as promoting the city.2 The chamber's use of the public funds would be limited to the statutorily authorized activities. We urge cities to review documents submitted by the chamber of commerce to verify that the money is spent for contracted statutory purposes. I hope this is helpful. Sincerely, Jennifer Janovy Edina STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR '; ��;.• -_ Gaya.' SUITE 500 525 PARK STREET REBECCA OTTO SAINT PAUL, MN 55103 -2139 STATE AUDITOR Statement of Position Public Expenditures: Donations and Dues (651) 296 -2551 (Voice) (651) 296 -4755 (Fax) state. auditor(a)state.nui.us (E -mail) 1- 800 -627 -3529 (Relay Service) Public entities are often asked to give funds to support various groups and activities. While the causes may be worthwhile, public entities need to be cautious when making any financial commitments involving public funds. Generally, in order to spend money on something, a public entity must have authority to do so. Authority for an expenditure may be specifically stated in a statute or charter, or it may be implied as necessary to do what an express power authorizes. In addition, the expenditure must be for a "public purpose." Gifts/Donations to Private Individuals /Organizations Following these general principles, donations to people, non - profits, charities, or other groups are not permitted unless they are based upon specific statutory or charter authority. For example, the Minnesota Attorney General's Office has issued opinions finding that cities have no authority to donate city funds to 4 -H Clubs, the Red Cross, or the Boy Scouts. The assumption is that a gift of public funds to an individual or private entity necessarily serves a private rather than a public purpose. Before a public entity makes a contribution, it is important for that entity to determine that it has specific authorization to make the expenditure. Here are some examples of specific statutorily- authorized expenditures: • Artistic Organizations. A county, city or town may appropriate money to support artistic organizations. • Historical Causes. A town and most cities may annually appropriate a specified amount to a county historical society affiliated with, and approved by, the Minnesota Historical Society. The Attorney General's Office recognizes that a city can sponsor a centennial celebration. Cities and towns have express authority to commemorate important and outstanding events in the city or town's history. • Senior/Youth Centers. A county, city or town may appropriate money to support the facilities, programs, and services of a public or private, not - for - profit senior citizen center or youth center. Reviewed: September 2008 Revised: September 2008 2007 -1017 An Equal Opportunity Employer • Promotion. A city or urban town may appropriate up to $50,000 annually to an incorporated development society or organization of this state, for promoting, advertising, improving, or developing the economic and agricultural resources of the city or urban town.' Similarly, 'a county may appropriate an unlimited amount of money, to such an entity for promoting, advertising, improving or developing the economic and agricultural resources of the county. • Public Recreation Programs. Counties, cities, towns and school districts may spend funds to operate programs of public recreation, recreational- facilities, and playgrounds. These programs may be conducted independently or with any nonprofit organization.,'' • Employee Recognition. Towns may spend funds to recognize volunteers, service efforts, and retiring town officers. • Community Celebrations. Towns may spend funds to host or support a community celebration. Public entities should consult with their attorney and cities should review the League of Minnesota Cities research memo "Public Purpose Expenditures" for a more comprehensive list of authorized city expenditures. See littp://www.linc.org/niedia/dOCLimeiit/i /publicpLirposeexpeiiditures.pdt., , See also the League of Minnesota Cities PowerPoint presentation on "Public Purpose Expenditures," http• / /www Imnc orv/ media / document/ I/ pubIicpur poseexpendituresac.pdf. If the public entity wants to make other donations, the entity may wish to seek specific statutory authority for them. Additionally, public entities may enter into contracts with an organization to accomplish tasks that the entity is authorized to perform by statute or charter. For example, a city could not give money to the Boy Scouts for a recycling program, but the city could enter a contract with the =Boy Scouts to do part of its recycling program._ The amount of money paid to the BbyScouts must be related to the value of the services they provide to the city. Memberships and Dues There is no general authorization for cities to join "private" organizations; but there may be specific statutory or charter authority to join specific organizations. For example, . cities and urban towns in Minnesota may pay dues to become members of. the League of Minnesota Cities. Similarly, cities, counties, and towns may appropriate money for membership in county, regional, state, and national associations of a civic, educational, or governmental nature. These associations must have as their purpose the betterment and improvement of municipal governmental operations. This authorization also allows public entities to participate in the meetings and activities of these associations. ' In addition, Economic Development Authorities (EDAs) have authority to conduct activities advancing the city and its economic development, and to carry out other public relations activities to promote the city and its economic development. Reviewed: September 2008. 2 Revised: September 2008 2007 -1017 The Attorney General's Office has determined that local units of government may not pay dues to a local.chamber of commerce. However, because cities may appropriate up to $50,000 to an incorporated development society or organization for promotional activities, a city could contract with a local chamber of commerce for one of the purposes authorized by statute, such. as promoting the city.2 The chamber's use of the public funds would be limited to the ,statutorily authorized activities. We urge cities to review documents submitted by the chamber of commerce to verify that the money is spent for contracted statutory purposes. Z An EDA has broader authority to join an official, industrial, commercial or trade association, or other organization concerned with one of the EDA's authorized purposes. Reviewed: September 2008 3 Revised: September 2008 2007 -1017 Gmail - 6033 Kellogg driveway apron Dear Chad, ii Before the Pamela Park neighborhood street project started, wet alked about the apron on my driveway. You told me there is supposedly a new rule 11- miting the amount of cement'poured for the apron to approximately 3 feet for.existing asphalt driveways. This seems to be an arbitrary new rule as last year there were variances'on the length of concrete poured-(see r driveway on 5940 Fairfax Avenue). The end result, as I predicted, will -look cheap and shoddywith the asphalt extension. There seems to be no reason the asphalt couldn't have been cut to fit the,.same two cement segments that were poured on all the cement driveways. If this were work.I contracted myself, I certainly would expect and would negotiate a discount for the concession we have had to make by accepting a driveway that is not to our specifications. Accordingly, I expect that my bill will reflect this fact. I understand that as home owners, we pay only a portion of the cost of the entire project, but we still are paying out of pocket and should receive service to our satisfaction. Regards, Eric and Constance Fantin 6033 Kellogg Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 cc: MayorJivwHovland (via7,US Post) __ __ _________ Page 1 of 1 Eric Fantin <straigh8 @gmaiI -com> Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:13 PM https: / /mail. google. com /mail / ?ui= 2 &ik =b571 e561 al &view= pt&search= sent &th= 12ad4b9a... 9/2/2010 September 10,,2010 REGENED SEP 16 2010 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina Edina City Hall: 4801 West 'SOth Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in Edina, Section 3 Dear Mayor.Hovland, We are writing in regards to the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, Section 3. The sidewalk that would be displaced is a well =used sidewalk. In. addition to the many able- bodied walkers, there are al few of us who use wheelchairs. Please consider our safety as you look at the proposaf'before you. We are leery of bicyclists weaving in between the,walkers and wheelers as their hearing and speed is greater than ours. I enjoyed seeing you at Braemar golf course this summer. Mike Ites Frona Ites �� l� er Comcaste 10 Rivet Cable 10 River Park Plaza St Paul, MN 55107 RECEIVED SEP 16 1010 September 15, 2010 Dear Community Leader: Starting September 20, 2010, Comcast is changing the names of its video, Internet and voice services in your community to XFINITY TV, XFINITY INTERNET and XFINITY VOICE. XFINITY represents Comcast's tremendous investment in our network and products in the Twin -Cities Region to offer our subscribers more HD, more speed, more choices and more control than ever before. Our customers can enjoy the best entertainment and communications choices whenever they want, wherever they are and however they want. • XFINITY TV offers triple the HD channels, increasing to 5,000+ HD choices, and the best HD picture quality available, as well as 50 to 70 multi - cultural channels and approaching 20,000+ Video On Demand choices. • FANCAST XFINITY TV offers thousands of movies, top shows and other content available online, at home or on the go. • XFINITY INTERNET offers 50Mbps speeds with 100+ Mbps coming soon and even.faster in the fixture.: • XFINITY VOICE which let our customers' TV, phone and Internet work seamlessly together in new and innovative ways. While the names of our products are changing to XFINITY TV, XFINITY INTERNET and XFINITY VOICE, the Comcast name will not change. The names of any Comcast companies with which you have agreements, including franchise agreements, remain the same. We are pleased to have this opportunity to introduce you to XFINITY TV, XFINITY INTERNET and XFINITY VOICE. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, or any matter, please feel free to contact me at 651- 493 -5774. Sincerely, Emmett Coleman Vice President, Government Affairs Comcast -Twin Cities Region (Enclosure) XFINITY Fact Sheet • XFINITY is the new brand for Comcast's technology platform, products and services. (Comcast remains the name of the company.) • XFINITY represents the future of our company and it's a promise to customers that we'll keep innovating. • XFINITY is about offering our customers more HD, more speed, more choice and more control over their services. • XFINITY is the culmination of years of work to transition Comcast's network and products to a platform that provides: o 50Mbps downloads today increasing to 100+ Mbps and even faster in the future. o 100+ HD Channels, 5,000+ HD choices, and the best HD picture quality available. o 50 to 70 multi - cultural channels. o Approaching 20,000+ Video On Demand choices. o FANCAST XFINITY TV, with 19,000+ movies, top shows and other content available online, at home or on the go. o New cross - platform and mobile features like: remote DVR, Universal Caller ID, an interactive home telephone, apps for iPhones and the ability to use a remote control to order products and services while watching TV. • When we launch XFINITY in a market, we'll rebrand our products: XFINITY TV, XFINITY Voice and XFINITY Internet. For clarity, below is an overview of our new brands: Master brand Ccomcast. Service sub -brand f in ity Serviceoiferings XFIPJITYTV XFINITY INTERNET XFINITY VOICE • The transition to XFINITY is already well underway across the country. It has rolled out in a number of markets including: Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington D.C., Chicago, Portland, Seattle, Hartford, Augusta, Chattanooga, parts of the Bay Area and San Francisco, with more markets to come. • The launch of XFINITY represents Comcast's investment to enhance our products and services so our customers can enjoy the best entertainment and communications choices wherever they are, whenever and however they want. ,:1V Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th St. Edina,_Mn.55424 SEP 1 6 Sept. 8.2010 I have lived at Manor Homes in Edina for 16 yrs. I stringently agree with the letter written to you By Kenneth Kadash and the attached "Points of Concern - Sec. 3" The traffic issue on Lincoln Drive, the 19 road ways for residence exiting on to Lincoln Dr. and the limited view of car traffic because of the curves is at times alarming-. A clear View of cyclist will.even be more difficult. Many that bike this road do so at excessive speed with no concern for resident exists. There.will be an accident and some people will be killed. It will too late_ to undo what is proposed. Approval of Sec. 2 will avoid this. Jam s M. Grogan n � l�11 Q ~/ ne F 186a RE PO RPRECO M M E N ®ATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. -1 DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion ® Information Date: SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan Howl RECEIVED Dear Mayor and Edina Council Members, SEp.2 12010 I have lived I Eden Prairie both before and after Scott Neal became our City Manager, I just wanted to drop you a line an let you know what a remarkable.job he has done for the residents of Eden Prairie. Over the years I have been very involved. in a number of issues facing the City of Eden Prairie. My. volunteer work has, taken me in front'of the _City Council on a number of occasions, and I have had a chance'' to work directly with City Staff on some of these issues. It has been, my observation,that as a result of Scott Neal's leadership, the City staff people have been able to be very effective in getting the City's business done,. and the City Staff are very professional in the way they interact with the public. Mr. Neal seems to be able to get everyone working together happily towards a common goal. I have'enjoyed, working with the City Council during Mr. Neal's tenure as well. A has been my observation that because of Mr. Neal's hard work, the City Council members have an easier time doing their job as well. ,Not all Cities have the benefit of a talented manager like him. And I have noticed that it can be pure misery for cities that don't. I think you will have-the great good fortune to find, as I did, that things just work more smoothly with Scott Neal at the helm. He is a talented person, with a great vision of how a city can work. You are lucky to have hired him. I will be very sorry to see him go. Lisa Rolf 14 year Eden Prairie Resident Susan Howl I t. From: Susan A. Hanson (mailto:suehanson @vklaw.net] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:45 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please distribute to City Leaders RECEIVED TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager SEP 2 01010 Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Cary Teague, Planning Director Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director As a resident and taxpayer in Edina, we strongly encourage you to amend Edina building code, 850.11 Section H. The current 1 -foot elevation height restriction may be applicable in some neighborhoods (e.g. Country Club and South Harriett Park), but is restrictive and a detriment to many other neighborhoods. We support reasonable building ordinances that protect historical neighborhoods and the architectural integrity of new building, but 850.11 Section H is too limiting and extreme. It does not take into consideration problems with much of the aging housing stock and irregular lot issues with a large percentage of homes in Edina. Instead, we would suggest that you amend the code to include language previously suggested by City Planner, Cary Teague to read, ".....The first floor elevation may be raised up to four feet, only if it is necessary because of high ground water or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements." Please consider our request. Sue & Paul Hanson 4520 Garrison Lane Edina, MN 55425 9520920 -7930 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2010 ;;A Metropolitan Council v September 17, 2010 Dear Mayor: The inflow and infiltration (1 /1) of clear water into local and regional wastewater pipes is a waste of financial resources and an environmental threat. But with the help and participation of communities across the region, the continuing effort to eliminate clear water from the wastewater treatment system is a big success. In fact, the 47 communities identified as having excess 1/1 are making such good progress that we've been able to avoid surcharges on municipal wastewater fees in all but one instance. Additional good news stems from Metro Council action that gives communities more time to complete mitigation work. The Council, in fact, will continue the program on a more permanent basis to ensure mitigation work continues to prevent clear water from entering the wastewater system and using up needed capacity. The decision to continue the program on an ongoing basis reflects the region's progress to date, as well as a commitment to eliminating excess 1/1 well into the future. We expect regional savings will amount to hundreds of millions of dollars, helping to maintain regional sewer rates that are among the lowest in the country. The Council approved changes to the 1/1 reduction program on Sept. 8, based on the recommendations of a task force that I appointed last year. The task force included local government staff, Metro Cities and Council Member Wendy Wulff, who served as chair. It was charged with determining how best to implement a "demand charge," beginning in 2013, on those communities that didn't meet 1/1 reduction goals. As originally conceived, the demand charge would have been used to help pay the costs of addressing 1/1 at the regional level and building additional capacity at considerable expense. But the task force recommended, and the Council agreed, that communities need more time to continue their mitigation work. We also concluded that slower growth and less flow means we'll have sufficient capacity for more years than previously anticipated, which gives us more time. I am very pleased with the outcome. Changes to the program create further incentive for voluntary compliance, and impose demand charges only as a last resort and on a case - by -case basis. Specifically,. changes to the 1/1 program will: • Continue the 1/1 reduction program indefinitely, recognizing that mitigation at the source is the most cost effective and efficient approach to reducing 1 /I. • Allow some communities to defer some 2011 1/1 reduction work until 2012. • Eliminate a systematic 2013 demand charge and impose a demand charge only as a last resort on communities that do not implement an effective 1/1 reduction www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 a Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer program, or if regulations and /or regulatory permits require Council action to ensure compliance. The charge, if implemented, would be used to cover the cost of building offline storage to handle excessive peak flows. • Improve the methodology for determining excess 1 /1. To date, communities identified as having excess 1/1 have spent nearly $50 million to reduce 1 /I. The Council estimates we would have to spend closer to $1 billion to expand wastewater collection and treatment capacity to handle excess 1 /1. The success of this program and the considerable savings to taxpayers is the result of the hard work and commitment of metro communities. also want to thank Council Member Wulff for her work and dedication to this initiative, as well as all those who participated on the task force. We should all feel very good about the savings to the region achieved. through the efforts of your communities. If you have any questions about the program or recent changes, I encourage you to contact Bryce Pickart, MCES Assistant General Manager, at 651.602.1091, or Jason Willett, MCES Finance Director, at 651.602.1196. Sincerely, . 3 a-rojjv Peter Bell, Chair c: City Manager /Administrator John Keprios Edina Park Board Director Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50'h St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Nine Mile Creek Trail Dear John, September 15, 2010 Parks were set aside to be used and enjoyed by everyone ... not a select few. RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2010 We can leave no greater legacy to future generations then to expand a park system that provides access to outdoor recreation to all and at the same time protects and improves vital natural areas. We have the opportunity. now with the proposed Three Rivers Park District walking and biking trail along Nine Mile Creek in Edina. I have walked the entire ' length of Nine Mile Creek that flows through Edina. In many places it is just a drainage ditch. The creek is on the state's impaired water list because its muddy flow doesn't support the fish species that a creek of this type should. Nine Mile Creek Watershed is proposing to restore Nine Mile' Creek through the City which may include constructing gentle curves thus making a natural habitat for fish and wildlife. If a Creek -based trail route is chosen, the Park District and Watershed District will collaborate efforts and conduct stream restoration in conjunction with trail construction. The staff at Three Rivers Park District are. professionals in designing paths that are ecologically sound as well as taking into account and respecting near -by homes. f I have biked most of the existing Three Rivers Park District Bike and Walking Trails. Along the way I have observed deer, turkeys, ducks, egrets, song birds and a turtle laying her eggs all living in harmony with the trail. The trail would provide safe and convenient biking and walking routes connecting homes to work places, schools, recreation and shopping. The proposed path through Edina is a critical part of a larger regional trail system, connecting the western suburbs and beyond. Is the City of Edina going to have the path stop at its borders thus making us an island? Some have proposed that the trail be put on city streets. Biking on streets creates a safety problem and the recreational value would be lost. Public health advocates urge us to get more exercise. " Many studies show that people living in walkable neighborhoods walk and cycle, more for recreation and transportation and are less likely to be obese ". (Jim Sallies, Director of Childhood Obesity Prevention Group) The Three Rivers Park District reports that there are typically six Police Officers and six PSO's on duty at any given time within the park district. These numbers can vary day to day, depending on special events. The Park District has not had any violent crimes such as rape, robbery or assaults occur on the Park District, Regional Trail System. The Park District will use a variety of funding sources to pay for the development of the proposed trail including its own bonding authority, regional grants from the Metropolitan Council, State grants and Federal grants, "Each year Edina residents pay more than 3.5 million in taxes to the Three Rivers Park District yet the City Of Edwa has no trails or other district owned park facilities within our borders ". - (Star &.;Tribune, January 3 is', 2009) If we -don't act at this time to approve the Three Rivers Park District path proposed along Nine Mile Creek in'Edina, it will be a lost opportunity to improve the lives of future generations. I urge your support. Respectfully, , Steve Sando (68 year Edina resident) 5133 Juanita Ave MN 55424 (952) 927 -7830 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2010 FROM: EDINA CHEMICAL HEALTH PARTNERS RE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 at 7 PM- Edina City Hall (50th St. & HWY 100) This Edina City Council Meeting will include a public hearing where people can speak. YOU CAN EITHER SPEAK AT THE MEETING - OR ATTEND TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT. AT THE MEETING THE MAYOR WILL ASK ANYONE WITH COMMENTS TO,COME TO THE MICROPHONE. YOU WILL HAVE 3 MINUTES TO SPEAK. OTHERWISE, YOU_ R PRESENCE IN THE AUDIENCE IS GREAT TOO! The Edina City Council held their first discussion on revising the temporary intoxicating license ordinance. During the discussion, it was decided to revise the draft again, so now it is being re- written and I've asked one of the council members to let me know when it will be'available to review. This all started because St. Pat's served alcohol at some eventand someone complained that they were not licensed. They found out that the current temporary alcohol licensefor intoxicating beverages (like wine) is only issued to four organizations: Edina Chamber of Commerce, 50th & France Business and Professional Assoc., the Edina Community Foundation and the City of Edina. Now St. Pat's wants to be legal. This ordinance change will open the door to alcohol sales for any qualified non - profit to get a temporary permit up to 2 times per year. Here is the summary of what they talked about: Since compliance checks can't be done for these types of licenses (time limited events, at most twice a year), the council emphasized the importance of keeping underage kids from access to alcohol. Wristbands will be listed as a suggestion for the non - profits applying for a permit. These would be put on the buyers after they have proved age with ID. The current ordinance already requires certain information to obtain the permit, like the plan for the event, the location, what and how will be served, and security in place. Also'the sales must be in an enclosed area. There was great concern expressed that if underage youth are volunteering as servers, what kinds of protections will be in place for them. Additionally, how do we keep the event safe for all involved? (not serving to obviously intoxicated individuals etc) The revised ordinance will have the following additional provisions (as discussed last night) Identify a manager for the alcohol portion of the event. Off -duty police officer on site. (The officer can be from any community, not just Edina, that way, if a church has a member who is a police officer and wants to volunteer their time to the event, they can do so, without having to pay the officer.) Require that food be offered as well. No drinking on the job. Check all IDs for people under age 30. No underage youth (under 21) allowed inside area enclosed for alcohol sales. No sales to obviously intoxicated individuals. No drinking alcohol on the job. One drink per purchase. No drink specials. The booth will close at least 30 minutes (ideally 60 minutes) prior to the event ending. Here is the video from the Edina City Council mtg where the revision was discussed: http:// edina .granicus.com /MediaPlayer.php ?view id =3 &clip id =1041 and move the bar to 32:25 you will hear the discussion about the revision of the law on temporary licenses for sales of intoxicating beverages. Kathy Iverson Edina Chemical Health Partners Susan Howl From: Rieckhoff, Judy [ maiIto :]udyRieckhoff @edinarealty.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 6:17 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Code 850.11 Section H - Please Distribute to City Leaders. RECEIVED TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager SEP 2 9 2910 Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner :Stephen Brown Planning Comnmissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning .Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning. Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning' Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Cary Teague, Planning Director Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director From: Judy and Bill Rieckhoff, 7212 Monardo Lane, Edina,MN 55435, 952 - 927 -7939 As 40 -year residents and taxpayers in Edina, we strongly encourage you to amend Edina building code, 850.11 Section H. The current 1 -foot elevation height restriction is unfairly impacting some homeowners where special circumstances are present. We were made aware of this situation by our friends Jeff Miller and Connie Corrino and we believe they have come up with a reasonable solution to it. We endorse their suggestion to amend the code with language previously suggested by City Planner, Cary Teague, .....The first floor elevation may be raised up to four feet, only if it is necessary because of high ground water or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements." Our long -time residency and work as Realtors in the community has given us an appreciation for the city's solid property values. We know we need strong protective_ codes and ordinances to maintain them but we also know that improvement of the aging housing stock is necessary as well. Codes and ordinances need to have the flexibility to accommodate reasonable. changes that allow homeowners to appropriately update and upgrade their properties. The proposed amendment is a case in point. Please give it your thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Judy and Bill Rieckhoff Judy Rieckhoff ff. Edina Realty 952 - 927 -1616 Direct 612 - 849 -6626 Cellular Susan Howl 'rom: Avelina Schneider [maiilto:avel_schn @msn.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:53 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Three Rivers Bicycle /Walking Trail Along Nine Mile Creek To: Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scott Housh Council Member Ann Swenson From: Avelina T. Schneider 6115 Lincoln Drive #244 Edina, MN 55436 Phone: 952 - 933 -6332 E -mail: avel schn@msn.com Re: Three Rivers Bicycle /Walking Trail Along Nine Mile Creek Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen, ,RECEIVED SEP 1 d 2010 I would like my name to be' added to those opposed to the Trail option known as Section 3 along �incolnNemon Drive from Caribou Coffee to the Vernon/Gleason stop light. I walk this sidewalk every single day at least once, more often twice or three times with my small ,dog. This is a very busy street/thoroughfare already with the Caribou strip mall, United.Health, many town, house and condominium communities, a church, double,homes and many side streets feeding into it. Many automobiles use it, some because it is the way to their residences, some because they work at United. Health (I don't even know the number in their workforce at that location, but it has a huge parking lot and ramp and it is totally full every day), some to do business at the strip mall and many, many who want to avoid the Hwy 169 - Crosstown traffic. The sidewalk is also very, very busy. Many people such as myself walk their pets .there two or three times a day. I have seen disabled adults walking along the sidewalk with their aides or caregivers. I have seen a disabled child with an aide /caregiver. There is a man who drives his power wheelchair there on most nice days. Many people who are just "elderly ". walk there as well. 'Employees from United Health walk/jog there during their lunch hour and many walk 'along there as they take a cigarette break. 1n short, the sidewalk is already busy to, capacity and is not compatible to bike'.traff c, not even on the street, much less sharing a path with.the people who live and work there. It would be too dangerous to try to put bikes and walkers on the same path with just a yellow line down the middle. The width of the street and sidewalk areas are also too narrow to accommodate this added bike trail and, to widen it would'add unecessary risk to, current users and destroy the little neighborhood ambience we.now enjoy. I. also take my dog to Walnut Creek Park almost every day. It is my chief alternate choice of places to take tim. The option known as Section 2 is -a much more satisfactory one. I walk in that neighborhood as well and know it very well. While I know the people along the route will be unhappy, it will impact far fewer homes and virtually no street traffic. Families with children use the park quite a.bit, but if I understand the plan, the path would only go along the south side. If I understand the plan correctly, it looks like it would only share that 1 south side for maybe 100 yards. I think it's possible they could build a separate path alongside the_existing one, like at Bredesen. There is room. A boardwalk through the wetlands would make a lovely ride for the cyclists. I hope addressing this letter to all of you is acceptable. If each of you wants a letter, just let me know, I will be happy to write to you individually. If you would like to contact me for any reason, please call or write. Thank you for your consideration, Avelina T. Schneider Minutes of the Edina Park Board July 13, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Kenney, Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Ben Pobuda, Ellen Jones, Louise Segreto MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lough STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios; Ed-MacHolda, Janet Canton, Doug Bauman I. APPROVAL OF THE' APRIL 13, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES, Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL •13, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. EHS Hockey Alumni Proposal - Casey Hankinson, former Edina Hockey player, presented an idea to the Park Board regarding Braemar Arena. He explained to the Park Board that there's an alumni component of Edina Hockey which started the "Willard Ikola" golf tournament approximately four years ago. He stated that they have been raising money to update Braemar Arena. In addition, they have also given approximately $10,000 to the "Willard Ikola Scholarship Fund" which goes to players on the Edina Varsity Hockey teams. Mr. Hankinson pointed out that they would like to update the tribute to the champions of Edina Hockey at Braemar Arena. Their proposal is to have a nice mural with some images of Coach Ikola, old hockey jerseys, etc., and give it a new updated life. He added that they would also be honoring Edina's ten'state championship teams. He explained that their thought is to have it Iodated in the west arena as you walk in. Mr. Hankinson pointed out that everything would be privately funded and that they would probably be doing it in phases with Phase t being the mural and images. He noted that phase II could possibly be the component with Coach Ikola as well as updating some of the pictures at Braemar Arena. Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks it's a great idea and thanked the EHS Alumni for putting this together. He commented that it's not only a great tribute to Coach Ikola but to the rest of the teams and thanked them on_.behalf of the Park Board for putting the time into this project. x Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Meyer if this has been brought to the School Board to look at. Mr. Meyer replied that there wasn't a formal vote on it but that there was some brief discussion and support by consensus on behalf.of the School Board for the concept. 1 Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Doug Bauman, Arena Manager, did bring the concept to the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club as well as the Edina Hockey Association and both organizations support the concept. Todd Fronek MOVED TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL FROM THE EHS HOCKEY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION. Ellen Jones SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. Veteran's Memorial Committee — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that there are now 11 members willing to serve on the official Veteran's Memorial Committee. He indicated that they recently had their "organizational meeting" where they basically gave their visions and views of where they are headed as well as find out what everyone's level of support and commitment is. He noted that they were very pleased with the meeting. Mr. Keprios indicated that what he is looking for from the Park Board is the approval of the concept to move forward with this official committee so they can begin to deliberate on the proper site, location, design, etc. Rob Presthus MOVED THAT THE PARK BOARD SUPPORT STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE VETERANS MEMORIAL CONCEPT BY APPROVING THE FORMAL COMMITTEE OF ELEVEN VOLUNTEERS AS PRESENTED. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Community Advisory Team Report — Ms. Jones informed the Park Board that on June 18th representatives from the Community Advisory Team presented their findings to the Edina City Council, no formal actions were requested or made. She noted that on June 29th the Community Advisory Team met again to discuss what their next step should be which it was agreed to create a final written report that would be presented to the City Council. It was also decided that they would seek approval from the City Council to apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Livable Community Grant. Ms. Jones pointed out that if they are awarded the grant it would cover expenses associated with developing a technical plan for this small area. That grant would cover planning issues related to transportation, land use, utilities infrastructure, financing and market analysis. She stated that on July 6`h the City Council granted permission to apply for this grant and added that the grants are awarded in the fall. She commented that the Community Advisory Team is planning a meeting again soon to review the final report and that she thinks they are wrapping up. D. Park Board Liaison to the BETF — Mr. Hulbert informed the Park Board that the Bike Edina Task Force is looking for a liaison from the Park Board. Ms. Jones stated that she would be willing to do it. III. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Three Rivers Park District has completed their second of two Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) open houses. The purpose of the open houses was to educate the public about the findings of the EAW as well as a lot of statistics. He noted that he thought the open houses went very well and there were a lot of good comments and a lot of feedback. Mr. Keprios indicated that there was a 30 day comment period for the EAW which ends tomorrow. He explained that the next step is everything goes to the Three Rivers Board of Commissioners to look at all of the input from the community. At that time they will either accept or not accept the EAW and will then make a determination to see if they will need to conduct any further environmental impact studies. Mr. Fronek stated that in looking at some of the emails, a lot of them suggested that Route 5F was added late to the game and felt there may be some funny business going on regarding how the route was established. He indicated that in regards to financing it's clear it's going to be very, very expensive but it was his understanding that Three Rivers had the financing somewhat developed and taken care of. He asked Mr. Keprios to comment on those two items. Mr. Keprios replied that Three Rivers Park District staff proposed alternate Route 5F late in the process. He noted that Three Rivers Park District staff felt that alternate route 5F was bound to happen eventually based on the data they received from the results of the EAW. Mr. Keprios explained that he felt it was bad timing when Three Rivers Park District staff presented it at the last Community Assessment team meeting. He noted that the volunteers were understandably upset because they were told at the start that they would not be entertaining any alternate routes through the process. Mr. Keprios commented that they may have to look at some other alternates if some turn out to be not feasible due to social, economic and/or environmental reasons or other reasons. He commented that it is possible that some segments might fall off the map and they will have to look at another route. Mr. Keprios explained as far as the financing is concerned it is very expensive and he thinks part of the 5F was a way to try to find a way to reduce some of the expenses. He indicated that as far as where the money comes from there is some very good detailed information available on the Questions and Answers section on the Three Rivers Park website. He pointed out that the majority of funding to build the large bridges over the Crosstown Highway and Highway 100 will come from federal dollars through federal grants. Other funding will include bonding and the Three Rivers Park District's CIP which are tax dollars from all of Hennepin County and not just Edina. He noted that it's not a special assessment but it's essentially taxation through all of Hennepin County which they draw their revenue from. In addition, a lot will be Minnesota State dollars. Mr. Keprios commented that it will likely take 10 to 15 years to get it all done. B. Centennial Lakes Farmer's Market - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Farmer's Market has been successful beyond what they expected. He noted that the first day several of the vendors sold out of their products so many of them doubled up for this past Thursday and they still ran out. Mr. Keprios indicated that a lot of people are showing up early to be assured the product will be available. Therefore, they are very strict with their vendors to not sell anything until 3:00 pm because they don't want people showing up at 2:00 pm and waiting in line for an hour. He commented they have had very few problems and for the most part everything has been very, very positive. IV. PARK BOARD COMMENTS A. Memorial Policies - Ms. Jones asked Mr. Keprios if there is a policy on memorials. Mr. Keprios replied there is a Donations Policy which was approved by the Park Board and City Council about a decade ago. He explained that permanent plaques are no longer allowed in the park system unless the donation is equal to or greater than $5,000 either singularly or collectively in a group. Mr. Keprios stated that as far as naming things and memorials there really is no policy that addresses that specifically. Mr. Hulbert indicated that with the different requests they've had this year for the Flying Disc Championship and the May Term Project as well as a couple of requests for memorials, maybe now would be a good time for the Park Board to have a separate work session to talk about the policy and whether or not they may want to create a new policy. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks it would be time well spent if the topic was more naming of facilities or parks because there already is a policy in place for donations. He noted that the last time this came to the Park Board and ultimately the City Council the resolve that the City Council had at the time was that they would prefer to deal with them on a case by case basis. Mr. Keprios commented that there are policies out there in communities that are all over the map with all different types of stipulations. He stated that he would be happy to have a work session but would need a little more direction from the Park Board on how they would like him to proceed. Ms. Segreto indicated that she would find it helpful and would like to talk about memorials during these times of economic shortfalls and budget constraints. She noted that it's hard to decline any contribution that someone wants to make and wondered whether they could aggregate contributions so that maybe the plaque wouldn't carry just one name but it would be an aggregation of perhaps five people just to get more money coming in. It's just a thought. Mr. Hulbert replied that he thinks it's a thought that's worthwhile to get into a little bit. He indicated that he thinks it might be a good idea to throw more ideas out on the table. Mr. Keprios clarified that the Park Board would like the work session to address memorials, donations and naming of facilities /parks. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if he would distribute the current policies to the Park Board so that they can understand the framework that is currently in place. He noted that then they can come back with some questions and then maybe touch on the naming aspect as well. He commented that they are not going to get through all of this in a single session but they certainly can build on a foundation so that they have some basis for future decisions. 4 It was decided to hold a work session an-hour before the August 91h Park Board meeting. B. Edina Aquatic Center Hours of Operation - Mr: Meyer indicated that he has been hearing some negative comments about the pool closing earlier this year and that there are some swim clubs using the pool. He asked what was the evolution of this issue. He noted that one of his concerns is the impact that it's had on families who aren't able to get to, the pool until 6:30 pm. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason they decided to close the pool an hour earlier was not a directive from the City ` Council but it was a general directive to try to find ways to make cuts, savings and :efficiencies, across the board.. He stated that he thought it was a wise move on Mr: MacHolda's part to make that ex to close earlier.' Mr. Keprios stated that there are true savings there and -yes, they are receiving some negative feedback and will probably have to reevaluate it for next year. Mr. MacHolda explained his reasoning for making the decision he did. He noted that in 2009 part-time seasonal staff's wages were frozen and in 2010 .their wages remained frozen. He_ indicated that when looking at hours compared to neighboring facilities to'his.surprise Edina was open later than St. Louis Park, Bloomington and Richfield which cl6se'at.7:00 and 7:30 depending on the day and month. He noted that by closing an1our earlier, in June, and July and half an hour earlier in August there would be a savings. He added that it takes approximately 22 to 24 people to run the facility at approximately $10.00 per person/hour, so it is a big savings. Mr. MacHolda indicated that once they made the move to change the hours, due to the economic times, instead of making further cutbacks they decided to generate a little bit of revenue. Therefore they went knocking on competitive swim team doors because with swim teams only one employee needs to be working. He noted that they didn't have to go as deep with their cutbacks, because of the revenue they found in the evening by the.swim teams. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that they did look at:other things but they didn't want to compromise what they currently provide to their patrons. Mr. Meyer stated that perhaps maybe one or two nights a week they could stay open a little longer. He noted that he thinks the biggest thing was it was a surprise to them even though the new hours were posted and publicized. Unfortunately; it was probably one of those things that they did not notice until they were, at the facility and it was closing an hour earlier than what they had become accustomed to.. Mr. MacHolda indicated that he wishes there would have been a better way of communicating this and hopes that they will be able to reinstate it next year. Mr. MacHolda commented that they have thought about extending the hours on Friday and Saturday nights and call them family nights since swim teams are using the facility Monday through Thursday but is has not happened. 5 C. John Valliere - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that John Valliere, Manager of Braemar Golf Course, gave his letter of resignation today for retirement. He indicated that it will be effective August 27, 2010. He commented that Mr. Valliere has been working for the City of Edina for over 40 years and noted that he will be dearly missed. Meeting adjourned at 7:45 pm 2 Minutes ofthe Edina Park Board Work Session August 9, 20 10 Edina City Hall, Community Room r MEMBERS; PRESENT: _Todd.Fronek; Dan Peterson, Bill Lough, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Louise Segreto MEMBERS ABSENT: Jennifer Kenney,. Rob Presthus, Ben Pobuda, Ellen Jones STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton I. DONATIONS/MEMORIALS POLICY Mr. Hulbert informed the Park Board that he thought it would be a. good idea to have a work session io discuss policies for donations and memorials. He indicated that during the past year they have had two memorials. One was for Timothy Nunn, a 14 year old who passed away unexpectedly. The second was for Dwayne Lindberg, a member of the Bike Edina Task Force, who passed away. He noted that currently there is a donations /memorial policy in place with specific dollar amounts. Mr. Hulbert indicated that in some cities. they literally have a catalog where if you donate X amount you can get a park bench or X amount you can get a water fountain, etc. He commented that he also thought it might be a way for the city to prioritize items that are important to them so that they are not wasting time and resources on _certain donated items that maybe aren't important to them. Mr. Hulbert pointed out that as an example there were some challenges with the Timothy Nunn memorials. The neighborhood raised money to surprise the Nunn Family with improvements -at the York Park baseball field where Timothy liked to play ball. Mr. Hulbert noted there were some beautiful improvements made. However, there was a large concrete structure, which staff did a nice job of putting together, but it looks like a tombstone. He commented that in theory something like that could be there for 300 years unless. someone moves it, whereas if it were a park bench with a 20 year life cycle it would naturally turn over on its own. Mr. Hulbert pointed out that some cities will say in their policies that things that -:are going to be constructed should. not be in open spaces /right -of -ways and;should be made out of green materials; etc. He stated that he would, like. to come up' with a way that people who want to make a donation to the city have a frame of reference of what is within reason and what is asking too much. Ms. Segreto stated that she thinks directing giving would be a great idea because she thinks a lot of people who are trying to make a donation can't come up with an idea and if they had a wish list maybe that would help. Mr. Keprios replied he has thought about that; however, for most people to give $5,000 scares them away. He noted that to come up with a wish list- that's. affordable is very challenging. He commented that what he has 1 learned through the years is that what's most important to those who want to donate is a permanent plaque because it's part of their grieving process. It really doesn't matter what the amenity is, they want the plaque. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he did make some mistakes in the process with the Nunn Memorial. He explained that when the neighborhood approached him about making improvements at the baseball field in memory of Tim Nunn to surprise the family. Mr. Keprios informed them that it's never going to be a scheduled field; it's a minimally maintained small area. He also informed them that it's a minimum $5,000 donation to have a plaque. The neighborhood raised the money and it went through the Edina Foundation. He explained that it was supposed to be a surprise but word leaked out and when construction started the Nunns stopped the contractor on the field and told him to stop working because it was supposed to be a grass infield to look more like a little league baseball field and not a multi - purpose baseball /softball field like we have at other small unscheduled fields. Mr. Keprios noted that the grieving parents came in his office in tears and he tried his best to make it a positive experience for all involved. He said that his first lesson was you can't make these things a secret; you must bring the family into it at the beginning of the process. He noted that he did make sure the family was aware that it was not going to be called the Timm Nunn Field to which they agreed "In Memory of was fine. He explained that to name a park or facility requires Park Board and City Council approval. Mr. Keprios noted that his second mistake was when a staff member, who is really good with concrete, drew up a plan to put the plaque on which the Nunn family really liked. In hindsight he felt that he should have gone with his original plan to place the plaque on a flat rock surrounded by flowers. He noted that they had to redo what they already did to have the field the way the Nunns wanted and so they had to get involved in change order pricing with the hired contractor and commented that there were some other challenges when dealing with a grieving family. Mr. Hulbert asked if having some policy would have helped in that situation. For example, it cannot say anything more than "In memory of or it can't be any more than so many inches, or you need to pick from specific items, or the city prioritizes what they want to have done. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks part of these things should be left to staff to deal with; however, we admittedly may make some mistakes but will hopefully learn from those mistakes. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios what the Park Board can do to help. Mr. Keprios replied there currently is a policy in place that helps him. Mr. Meyer asked what tools could have been in place that could have helped with the Dwayne Lindberg Memorial. Mr. Keprios responded that the Lindberg Memorial plaque was a departure from the current policy. He noted that he was directed to put the plaque in place. He pointed out that there was no money donated; however, there is a plaque on stone at Centennial Lakes that says "In Memoriam, Dwayne Lindberg, Member of the Bike Edina Task Force 2006- 2010." He stated that in this case, the City Manager directed him to purchase and install the plaque as requested by a City Council member. Mr. Keprios pointed out it's not an ordinance it's a policy so another policy would not have helped in that case. He stated that the policy that's in place now does detract from what would otherwise be filling the 2 parks with plaques because to the donor the plaque is more important than the park amenity. Ms. Segreto asked what if something was done besides a plaque. What if they did a brick in place of a plaque at Arneson Acres, that way you wouldn't be turning away donations. Mr. Keprios stated that gift bricks are a good fundraising method for larger projects like the gazebo at Arneson Acres Park. We have not used that method for ongoing donations. Mr. Keprios pointed out that what the current policy has eliminated is donating a tree that costs approximately $100.00 but the donor wants to place a $200.00 plaque at the base of the tree. If a mower hits it the city is responsible to replace it. That is what they've been able to avoid with the current policy. Mr. Fronek asked if they could put a policy in place with regards to a material change in the park that when a donation is made there are conditions and certain steps that need to be followed. Mr. Meyer asked if something is changing in the park and the improvements need maintaining, does the city allow for those costs as part of the process. Mr. Keprios replied that with the Nunn Memorial had it been requested to have a grass infield at the very start he would have rejected it and they would have been done with the issue. Mr. Meyer asked if there is a policy that they could put in place so that not only are they requiring the cost of the impact but also the maintenance over a period of years. Ms. Segreto stated that she doesn't think anyone will want to get hooked with that. Mr. Meyer replied probably not, but that they could structure it in such a way that they say the cost of implementation is X and with the special trimming that,will need to be done in the next five years the total number is 2X, would you like it or not. Mr. Keprios indicated that he has talked to the Park Foreman and City Forester and they have decided to increase the charge of donated trees so that it will cover the cost of future maintenance as well as administrative and forester time. Mr. Lough asked what the recognition is for donating a tree to which Mr. Keprios replied that in the past they would put a plaque in concrete next to every tree that was donated, however the current policy has eliminated that. Mr. Lough asked when the tree dies if the plaque goes too. Mr. Keprios replied the way he has been handling it is when a tree dies that has been donated and has a plaque he contacts the family and asks if they want to donate money for a new tree and continue on. If they choose not to then he gives the family the plaque. Mr. Meyer asked if they are going to a standard plaque or is it always specific per project. Mr. Keprios replied it's been specific per project. Mr. Meyer asked would it help to have something standard for e.g., an 8 x 8 inch brick with "In Memory Of' and up to 20 digits. However, if you're donating $50,000 or more you may be able to pick out something different. He noted that if people are picking out something every time they make a donation that takes a tremendous amount of staff's time. Mr. Meyer suggested saying there are 100 spots available to place a tree, they are $1,000 each and we are going to put 3 a 10 x 10 paver in the ground. Pick the one you want and it will be installed within the next six months. Ms. Steel stated that if recognition really is the key to getting donations maybe they need to be more creative in giving that recognition and it would be different for every park. She noted that she thinks they need to be a little more creative than just putting a plaque next to every tree. They need to help people think about different ways of donating to the parks. Mr. Peterson asked Mr. Keprios what happened when they closed the "Brian Wippermann Gun Range ". Mr. Keprios replied that when the new training facility was built they named the training room the " Wippermann Training Room" and the plaque is still there. Mr. Peterson asked what the situation is with the couple that left over $300,000 to Braemar Golf Course. Mr. Keprios replied it's in the Braemar Memorial Fund. Mr. Meyer asked where is the Braemar Memorial Fund to which Mr. Keprios explained that it is held by the City of Edina under an agreement approved by the City Council. It is in the City coffers and it's in a specific fund that's a dedicated fund which the City Council voted on and approved. The language is very specific that it cannot be used to pay off debt or used for operating fund things. It needs to be used for things that the golf course could otherwise not afford to do. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that regarding plaques they are in all shapes and sizes throughout the park system. He noted that, if the Park Board wants, he could try to come up with something that says on certain donations the size of the plaque would need to be limited to 8 x 10, etc. Ms. Segreto asked Mr. Keprios if a standard donor contract would make his life easier. She noted that they would address everything that's problematic in the contract. Mr. Meyer indicated wouldn't they be doing themselves a favor if they said here is our ten year vision for each of these parks and these are the things we are going to do. You are welcome to do one of these things. If you would like to do something outside of this you will need to jump through some more hoops. Mr. Keprios commented that they have their capital plan but that they are really large dollar items and thinks that, if the Park Board wants, he could work on a wish list of smaller more affordable items for donors to choose from. Mr. Meyer indicated that he still likes the idea of donating trees at $1,000 each. He noted doing this would be more of a process versus going around taking pictures, etc. and spend countless hours with these requests. Mr. Lough asked of the handful of donations that have met the requirements for a plaque in the past two years how many would have not gotten it if there was no plaque. Mr. Keprios replied he does not know the answer to that off the top of his head. Mr. Lough asked, "What is the City's obligation to the citizens of the community in recognizing 4 fellow citizens in memorials through plaques in the park ?" Mr. Keprios responded that is for the Park Board to decide. Mr. Lough stated it's a two sided question, what if they were to raise the amount to $50,000 before they can get a plaque and everything else goes into the general fund or Park and:Recreation Fund. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if a contract had been there would it have avoided a lot of issues and maybe the contract thing is a starting point for them. Mr. Keprios replied that's a wonderful idea. Mr. Fronek commented that just to streamline'the process maybe they should unload some of the work on the Edina Foundation because that's what it's there for. Mr. Fronek indicated that if all of the donations could be funneled through the Edina Community Foundation it may be a better way to deal. with them. Ms. Segreto stated that there was reference in the Edina Policy about a large plaque displaying the names of all large donors that was never erected. She asked if this is something they should.do now. Mr. Keprios explained that at the,time of the policy they were going through the anguish of what to do with the old building. Should they renovate it or tear it down and therefore was directed to not do a large plaque at that time. He noted that when they first moved into the new city hall everyone was directed to not hang anything on the walls so nothing has been done. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that his advice at this point would be to drop the whole language about the recognition board. Ms. Segreto commented that if it was standardized and the names were up for five or ten years maybe that would satisfy a donor. Mr. Keprios pointed out that all donors are listed yearly on the city website and quarterly in the About Town as well as they are given letters and are recognized at every City Council meeting so there is public recognition, it's just not on a permanent plaque. Ms. Steel indicated that she thinks there is a sentimental connection with the neighborhood parks and donations that are made. Therefore she doesn't know if a central city location would really meet the wants of all the people donating. Mr. MacHolda indicated that maybe there is a section of the city's website welcoming donors. He suggested someone from communications explore where places like the Guthrie for e.g. are going out and getting these donations as well as find out how they give recognition. Mr. Lough stated that one of the nice points of this discussion is that it's really-trying to do something for Edina and contributing money for Edina and less so about the memorial and remembrance part of it. Looking at doing something for the city but not invest a lot in plaques. Ms. Steel asked the Park Board to keep in mind there is a task force that is currently looking at considering a .Veterans. Memorial.. Therefore she doesn't want them to come up with a policy that is iri contradiction with what they are doing. Mr. Keprios indicated that there is a big difference between honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice for your country versus grieving a lost loved one. Ms. Steel commented that she still thinks they need to think about if there is any future donations to that or recognitions having to do with the memorial as well as what specific things can be replaced during its lifespan. Mr. Keprios stated that he is still not clear on how the Park Board feels about the elimination of the permanent plaque that is currently in the language of the policy. He asked the Park Board how they would feel if he took a shot at tweaking the current policy to include a contract as well as put something in there about a minimum donation for specific items. He noted that as staff they will work toward a wish list so that people can make it simple rather than going case by case. He asked as far as recognition with plaques, "Should it be left at a $5,000 threshold ?" Mr. Meyer replied to maybe raise it a little bit but he would like to see something really, really simple that is pre -done and straightforward. Mr. Fronek indicated that he definitely thinks there needs to be a threshold, whether it's an automated thing where if you donate X amount you get this. However, if the donation is $50,000 or more then there can perhaps be a little bit more back and forth. He noted that would be valuable staff time for those larger donations. Mr. Meyer commented that regarding plaques he still doesn't think they should be doing custom plaques. He noted that maybe if the donation is $20,000 and up then you get an 8 x 10 plaque, if it's less than $20,000 it's a 3 x 5 plaque. Ms. Steel indicated that in her vision a wish list would take care of all of this. It would just be the cost, location of the item, what recognition if any would be on it and the lifespan. The donor would know everything up front when they are shopping for an item. Mr. Keprios explained that as an example when the neighbors of Fox Meadow came forward wanting to develop the area into a park. They were able to raise a lot of money and get it done but they also wanted their names on a plaque, which ended up being a good size plaque. He noted that he could see this same thing happening at Van Valkenburg Park where the neighborhood wants to see the park developed and finished. What should that_ standard be? Ms. Steel replied that personally she thinks that things outside of the wish list should come to the Park Board to be fully vetted to have a good discussion so that everyone knows what is going on and has gotten their ideas across. Mr. Meyer asked how much funding is required to do what they want to do. Mr. Keprios replied approximately $300,000 to $400,000 for what they plan to do. He commented if they get motivated to raise money and do the whole thing, what do you do for those who donated? Mr. Fronek replied that's why they would have the threshold, if it's above $50,000 then the Park Director, Park Board and City Council should have a certain amount of leeway to figure out some sort of plaque or memorial that would be appropriate for a gift of that size. Mr. Meyer asked how many people would be donating, 3 or 50 to which Mr. Keprios replied 50. Mr. Meyer noted that he would have the plaque that says "Renovated by the neighbors of the park, 2010 ". He commented that he thinks they need to keep it simple. Ms. Segreto stated that she thinks they need to be able to make an exception when they want. 6 Mr. Lough indicated that for part of the policy he thinks they ought to consider the idea that they would like to increase participation among all of the citizens of Edina and encourage people to give something. He noted that he thinks they need to start a list and publish the list of people who give to the City and give a lot of hoopla to that list. He stated that you want to build that habit at a low level, $50, $100, etc. and then someday someone is going to turn around and give $5,000, $10,000 or $300,000 because they were reminded each year how much they appreciate the city and what has done for them and their families. He would like for people to start to consider building a habit of giving and getting recognition through their name on a list. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they already have a great program that does that. He stated that he knows there will still be people who will want something meaningful to them and their loved ones at a specific park that is not on the list. He asked how he should handle those requests. Mr. Meyer suggested he tell those people that he Park Board requires the Park Director to work only on equipment/materials that are part of their ten year vision for each park unless the gift is over $100,000. He stated that they need to have a framework that Mr. Keprios can operate with. Mr. Peterson commented that he doesn't see the reason why someone cannot have a plaque if they've donated a water fountain, bench, etc. Mr. Fronek indicated that if it meets a certain dollar amount they can. He added there are a thousand different ways for people to be memorialized, it doesn't necessarily need to be in a park or on city land. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they will get special requests like the one Park Board just approved for Willard Ikola at Braemar Arena. He noted those types of things he will continue to bring to the Park Board to rule on. II. NAMING PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the naming of parks and facilities has always been the City Council's call on a case by case basis, there is no written policy. He asked if this might be a discussion to have in a work session with the City Council. Mr. Keprios stated that naming things is strictly politics and. something that as a matter of practice staff stays away from. Mr. Meyer suggested that if it is brought up at a public hearing to name something after someone for the first time that the actual approval cannot take place for at least six months. This way something doesn't just show up on a building. There should be a separation timeline between when somebody is leaving or retiring versus when it can happen. Ms. Segreto asked why would the City Council approve that, why would they want to have their hands tied. Mr. Meyer replied because he thinks it's in their best interest so that it is not done out of emotion. Mr. Hulbert noted that he read some cities are no longer going to change the name of parks. However, facilities are still on the table for discussion. He noted that he does like the idea of having a timeline before naming of something can be approved. 7 Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks the difficult thing for future Park Boards and City Councils is that it's difficult to change the name of a real estate that's been named after someone. It's a little different when it's a building because buildings have a life expectancy and eventually have to be rebuilt and then it's an appropriate time to rename it. At what time does it feel okay to rename a park? Mr. Peterson indicated that since Braemar Golf Course Manager John Valliere is retiring after 40 plus years of service he would like everyone to think about renaming the nine- hole golf course to the "Valliere Golf Course." He pointed out that Mr. Valliere has done so much good with Braemar Golf course and especially with the Sister Kenney Golf program. He noted that it wouldn't cost much to redo a plaque above the little pro shop and someday when they are out of scorecards reprint them to say "John Valliere Executive Course." Dan Peterson MOVED THAT MOTION. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Fronek indicated that he thinks these are exactly the types of situations that a policy should be written for. Mr. Hulbert commented that he thinks one of the reasons they are talking about this is to kind of slow it down a bit. Mr. Meyer stated it comes back to his window of reality where they should wait`six months. At that time after everyone has thought about it and talked about a half dozen other options, then decide what it is they would like to do for Mr. Valliere and what really makes sense. Todd Fronek MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE MR. VALLIERE'S SERVICE TO THE CITY OF EDINA AND AS APPROPRIATE AND CONSIDER OPTIONS FOR EITHER NAMING A FACILITY OR PROVIDING SOME SORT OF RECOGNITION. FOR THE SERVICE THAT HE HAS GIVEN. Dan Peterson SECONDED TODD'S MOTION AND WITHDREW HIS ORIGINAL MOTION. In Favor — 5 — Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel Against — 1— Louise Segreto Abstained — 1 — Bill Lough Mr. Lough noted that since he is not completely familiar with the extent of Mr.Valliere's service to the city, therefore before voting for such a motion he would like to see a brief write up as to what it is and why they are voting and therefore has abstained. Keeya Steel MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO WAIT TO APPROVE THE NAMING OF FACILITIES AND PARKS FOR SIX MONTHS AFTER THE DEPARTURE OF CITY STAFF OR THE PASSING AWAY OF A RESIDENT. Mr. Meyer asked Ms. Steel if this is a motion that she would like to see pass now or is it part of a policy they are thinking about incorporating. Mr. Lough stated that for purposes 8 of a working session he would be willing to pass something that says my sense of the group is we are trying to slow this thing down and extend the period. Ms. Steel noted that her hesitation is sending that recommendation forward and not having any accompanying policy. Mr. Meyer pointed out that since Ms. Steel voted yes for the recommendation she can bring this up again because she wants to change her vote and see if it fails the second time around. Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks they are talking about two separate issues. He thinks one is recognition on behalf of the Park Board for Mr. Valliere's service.- Secondly does the Park Board want to recommend a particular policy to the City Council in terms of naming parks and/or facilities? Mr. Fronek stated it might be helpful to implement a, six month cooling off period. Mr. Peterson stated that he can see why the City Council would want to commemorate Gordon Hughes right away and name the pavilion at Centennial Lakes after him. He did an incredible job for the city as has Mr. Valliere. He doesn't see a need for a cooling off period. He sees a cooling off period for the death of a loved one who may want something out of the ordinary but can't quite get the $5,000 or $10;000. Maybe the grieving process will change their mind during those six months.' Ms. Steel pointed out to her it actually seems like increasing the importance of the service of that person because by waiting six months'and then having a ceremony and really recognizing the person. Ms. Segreto noted that she has a procedural issue question as to whether Ms. Steel can amend the motion that was passed. Mr. Meyer noted that she supported the motion and she is choosing to switch her vote so she can call up the motion again and see if there is support to vote it down. Mr. Hulbert stated that he thinks the City Council wants to have the flexibility when it comes to naming. of parks or facilities. Mr. Lough asked if the Park Board would typically look at naming a park or facility before it goes to the City Council for a vote or does it bypass the Park Board altogether. Mr. Peterson replied they are just.an advisory Board and if the City Council wants the Park Board's advice they will ask for it. Ms. Steel indicated that she thinks the discussions are going to take place regarding peoples' retirements or passing away no matter what. She stated that giving people time to really discuss which parks or facilities have meaning to this particular person have everyone included and take.a little time to think it through. She commented that she is fully confident in the City Council's decision to pick the appropriate place, she is' just asking for a little more time and not streamline it as soon as someone retires. Mr. Meyer indicated that maybe it's not appropriate tonight but at the next formal Park Board meeting recommend that they wait a:minimum of six months from the person's separation of employment or duty from the city before any naming rights are considered. 9 Ms. Steel stated that she approved the recommendation because she does believe Mr. Valliere should be recognized and should be considered for having. something named after him.`. However, at the same time she also believes that there needs to be some waiting time to fully think it through and get other people's input. Mr. Hulbert added that they may even find a better idea. 1VIr. Hulbert commented that when he initially saw that the promenade bike path was going to be named after Dwayne Lindberg he thought that was a pretty big gesture. He noted that in. that case it may have been a good thing to. wait the six months before doing. anything, Mr. Hulbert asked if this could be put on the agenda for the next Park Board meeting. Mr. Keprios replied that what he hears the Park Board saying is that they prefer a waiting period and therefore the language that he will put together will be from the comments he has heard that the waiting period would begin the day that a suggestion. is made regardless who the person is. Also, formal action wouldn't be taken for six months after 'the day that it is proposed and the departure. Mr. Meyer indicated that inaddition to the six month'waiting period so that it isn't an emotional response but what about the costs and long term implications. He gave the example what if they wanted to put up a 12 x 24 bronze plaque and.it's coming out of the city fund what are the financial, implications of that. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Meyer if he. is suggesting that the dollars should come from another source. Mr. Meyer replied possibly but more so he thinks in understanding of what the long -term cost implications are in terms of either city manpower or recognitions. Mr. Keprios replied that typically in naming of things there really are not a lot of costs. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board to think about a couple of things between now and their next meeting. In addition to a waiting period give some thought to whether the .policy should state that the person should be deceased before naming a park or facility after them. Also "give some thought to perpetuity once you name something, does" it always have to be that name or do you want:to .put a.:sunset on it. He indicate&that these Are just some ideas he has. heard kicked around in other naming policies. Mr. Meyer indicated that he thinks what Mr. Keprios is struggling with is sometimes when they name something down the, road nobody, remembers who they are and is it a value., He suggested that maybe the language is something along the lines of we are naming this park for a minimum of 50 years and after that it can be changed. °Mr. Keprios indicated just so he understands what the Park Board would like him to work on the naming of facilities: He asked if they would like him:to come up with something to look at for the September :meeting. Mr. Peterson and Mr. Hulbert both replied yes. Ms. Segreto replied she is not expecting anything, she doesn't think they should get into it: Mr. Hulbert asked- Mr. Keprios to tell them what he comes up with and they can talk about it at their next meeting. Mr. Keprios replied that he is happy to work on whatever the Park Board would like him to do as staff. He just wants to make sure he is doing what it is they are requesting of him. 10 Ms. Steel noted that she thinks it might be valuable to meet in a work session setting again. She suggested meeting an hour before the next Park Board meeting. Mr. Hulbert asked Mr. Keprios if that gives him enough time to work through the memorial donation ideas. He replied that may not have it completely ready but that the wish list will be: ready.. Mr. Hulbert asked about having another work session after the next Park Board meeting to which Mr. Keprios replied`;that would help a lot. Mr. Hulbert also suggested that they try to have another work session so that they are not trying to cram everything into an hour. III. PARK BOARD COMMENT A. Three Rivers Park - Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if there is any chance the Park Board could meet with someone from Three Rivers Park to give them all.the up -to- date information. He indicated that he knows currently there are a couple of different plans and routes. He noted that he thought it would be'helpful to understand what. they are currently proposing before the joint meeting that is currently scheduled for September 29`h. He commented they could do it in another work session type setting. Ms. Steel asked if there are documents available that speak about the issues that would be helpful and asked if they could be sent out electronically. Mr. Keprios pointed out that as of today there are three options that will be presented at the joint work session. He noted that it is now staff's mission to come up with the pros and cons of each option. He indicated that'he will see if Kelly Grissman from Three Rivers Park District can meet with the Park Board one hour before their September 14th Park Board meeting to bring the Park Board up -to -date on everything. Mr. Peterson asked what role the Park Board plays regarding the bike path. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks they are just asking for the Park Board to voice their own views on this. They are not looking for any specific recommendations from the Park Board yet at this time. MEETING ADJOURNED 11 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Monday, August 9, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West Chair Joel Stegner, Chris Rofidal, Ross Davis, Bob Schwartzbauer, Arlene Forrest and Elizabeth Montgomery Jean Rehkamp Larson, Claudia Carr, and Colleen Curran Joyce Repya, Associate Planner I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 11, 2010 Member Davis moved approval of the minutes from the May 11, 2010 meeting. Member Schwartzbauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificate of Appropriateness A. H -10 -03 4623 Bruce Avenue - New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4600 bIO& of Bruce Avenue. The existing home was constructed in 1927 and currently has a 3 -car detached garage accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property. Ms. Repya pointed out that the home has the original 1927 footprint of 835 square feet while the detached garage is almost as large at 794 square feet. It is the homeowner's desire to increase the livability of their home by adding a 666.5 square foot addition to the rear. In order to comply with maximum 30% lot coverage requirement, the large detached garage will be removed to be replaced by the proposed 484 square foot structure moved to the northeast corner of the yard which will also provide a more livable back yard space. The plans propose to demolish the existing 3 -stall garage in the southeast corner of the rear yard and building a new, 484 square foot detached 2 -stall garage in the northeast corner. The plan illustrates the new structure will maintain appropriate setbacks, and will be compatible in size, scale, and texture with the historic Tudor Revival style house and with other historic homes in the district. Attention to detail is provided on the south, east and west elevations. The undecorated north wall is partially screened by the fence that runs along the south property line. The clipped or "jerkin head" gable proposed for the east and west elevations nicely matches the shape of the roof on the house and the garage door and lanterns are appropriate for the property. A new curb cut will not be required since the proposed garage will be accessed by the existing driveway. While not subject to COA review, the homeowner provided the plans for the addition to the rear of the home for the board's information. Minutes Heritage Preservation Board August 9, 2010 Ms. Repya added that Consultant Vogel has reviewed the plans, and he along with Staff recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new detached garage. She pointed out that the plans are not unlike those previously reviewed for homes in the Country Club District, and will enhance both the subject property as well as the neighborhood at large. Furthermore, the proposed plans clearly demonstrate the homeowner's desire to provide for a more livable home both on the interior as well as in the rear yard. The recommendation for approval is subject to the following conditions: • The plans presented. • The condition that a year built (2010) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage as well as the addition to the home. Findings supporting the approval recommendation include: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Member Schwartzbauer stated that while he understands that under the current procedures for Certificates of Appropriateness in the Country Club District the addition to the home is not subject to review, he wanted to go on record expressing his opinion that he feels strongly that additions to homes in the district should undergo the same COA review as the new garages. Following a brief discussion, Chairman Stegner agreed that Member Schwartzbauer brought up a point of interest to several members of the board and suggested that the topic of amending the procedures for a COA to include additions visible from the public right -of -way be included on the September meeting agenda. Member Rofidal raised the following questions: 1. No architectural detailing is provided on the north wall of the garage because it is abutting a privacy fence. What if the fence is removed? Lon Oberpriller, from Replacement Homes representing the owners explained that the fence belongs to the abutting property owner, and if they chose to remove the fence, and did not like the blank wall of the proposed garage, they could replace the fence. 2. Since the owners of the home have recently purchased the property, how did they know that a Certificate of Appropriateness would be required for their project? Planner Repya explained that she and Mr. Fu had several conversations as his family was contemplating purchasing the property. He was encouraged to research the updated Country Club District information on the City's website which provided detailed information on the COA requirements and procedures. Lon Oberpriller from Replacement Housing Services Consortium, representing the new owners explained that he is aware of the COA procedures, and he too provided guidance for Mr. Fu and Ms. Ge as they were planning the project. Mr. Oberpriller added that this project was designed to enhance the livability of the home, maintain the property's historic integrity, and compliment the entire neighborhood. Fa Minutes Heritage Preservation Board August 9, 2010 Following a brief discussion, Member Rofidal moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new detached garage at 4623 Bruce Avenue subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque be placed on the garage. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY WALKING TOURS: Chairman Stegner observed that the Board's walking tour of the Morningside neighborhood during the July meeting was a wonderful opportunity for the HPB to get out from the meeting room and see first -hand the neighborhood currently under study. He added that such a tour would no doubt be of great interest to the community, and something that should be included in future work plans. Member Davis reminded the Board that he volunteered to research city tours that are currently in the planning files, and in doing so, discovered several city -wide tours as well as a tour of the west side of the Country Club District. Mr. Davis provided board members with copies of the tours, pointing out that they needed to be updated, but provided a good framework from which future tours could be created. Mr. Davis also pointed out that he knows a gentleman who does professional voice - overs, and he may be willing to record some of the copy for the tours at no cost. Member Rofidal added that perhaps the City's Communications and Marketing department could assist in producing the tours. The Board agreed these were all good ideas. A general discussion of city tours ensued. It was mentioned that an historic bike tour might be well received due to the current activities of the "Bike Edina" taskforce. Member Forrest observed that providing walking and /or biking tours would fit in well with the city's initiatives promoting healthy lifestyles — a great green project. Planner Repya pointed out that the Edina Historical Society has been working on creating an historic driving tour of the city. She suggested that perhaps the Historical Society and the HPB could work together since the tours would include information on important historic resources (the HPB's charge) as well as the history of Edina residents (the Historical Society's charge). Ms. Repya offered to contact the Historical Society regarding the status of their tour project and report back to the HPB. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None V. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE: September 16 -17 in Winona Planner Repya reminded the Board that the 2010 Minnesota Preservation Conference is scheduled for September 16 & 17 in the City of Winona. Because Edina is a Certified Local Government, attendance at the annual conference by at least one board member is mandatory. In the past, board members have attended the Friday session of the conference; however the State Historical Society is providing a matching grant to cover the registration fee and mileage for those attending on both Thursday and Friday. The city's match can include the time spent by board members at the conference, thus there may not be a cash match required. Ms. Repya pointed out that Friday, August 13th is the registration deadline for early registration. She asked Board members to check their calendars and report to her by August 13th if they would be able to attend. Ms. Repya also encouraged those interested to consider car - pooling to Minutes Heritage Preservation Board August 9, 2010 Winona, and offered to assist organizing the drive. A brief discussion ensued. Ms. Repya offered to send an email reminder from which the Board could respond. No formal action was taken. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. 4602 Bruce Avenue — House tour Member Rofidal reported that he attended a neighborhood open house for the newly constructed Country Club District home which received a Certificate of Appropriateness from the HPB in 2009. He observed that when one compares 4602 with the home at 4608 Bruce Avenue approved through a COA in 2006, the revised COA procedures have really paid off — the newest 4602 home fits in well with the district, whereas 4608 appears taller and less in keeping with its surroundings. He added that the new home is evidence that the influence of the HPB can make a difference in the district for the better. Member Rofidal then suggested that Andy Porter, the builder of 4602 Bruce Ave. be invited to a future meeting of the HPB to share photos of the completed home, as well as input he could provide regarding the COA process. Board members agreed that would be a good idea. 2. COA Procedures — Reviewing what is visible from the street Board members continued the discussion from earlier in the meeting regarding the desire to reevaluate the possibility of requiring a Country Club District COA review of not only changes to a street facing fagade, but any change visible from the street; which would then include changes to the sides of the homes. Member Rofidal opined that side walls have been important when reviewing new homes, and he welcomed a broader discussion on the topic. Member Forrest agreed, pointing out that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards address what is visible when standing in front of the house. Member Schwartzbauer offered to draft possible language that would address the review of changes to what is visible from the street, rather than only to changes on street facing facades. Board members agreed that they looked forward to a discussion on this. matter at the September meeting. 3. Signs Identifying Cahill School & Grange Hall — In disrepair Chairman Stegner observed that the informational signs on the exterior of the Cahill School and Grange Hall are quite weather beaten, and in need of upgrading. Planner Repya explained that the signs were installed by the Edina Historical Society. She offered to convey Mr. Stegner's observations, see if there are plans for making improvements to the signs, and report back to the board. 4. Student HPB Members - Farewell & Welcome Planner Repya recognized student member Elizabeth Montgomery who after serving the HPB for two years, was attending her last meeting. Ms. Montgomery stated that the thoroughly enjoyed her time with the Board, and will stay informed through the HPB's new and improved Minutes Heritage Preservation Board August 9, 2010 website. Elizabeth added that in September she will begin her freshman year at Concordia College in Moorhead, MN. Board members offered their thanks for Elizabeth's many contributions to the work of the HPB and wished her the very best in her future. Planner Repya introduced Lauren Thorsen, a senior at Edina High School, and one of the two new HPB student board members. Lauren was invited to observe the August meeting, and will begin her one year term in September. Board members welcomed Lauren and expressed their delight in working with her in the coming year. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: 1. Donation of reference materials for HPB from Kuhl Design Build — "Get Your House Right" by Marianne Cusato & Ben Penreath Planner Repya explained that the HPB received a donation of 10 copies of the book "Get Your House Right" for board members to use as a resource guide. The books were provided by Kuhl Design Build, the company responsible for the work recognized in the 2010 Heritage Award at 4411 Arden Avenue. The Kuhl Design Build team expressed their appreciation for the work of the HPB and offered the book as a tool to assist board members when undertaking design review. The board gratefully received the books, and agreed that when their terms expired, they would return the book for use by future board members. VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE: September 14, 2010 IX. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya Edina Public Art Committee - MINUTES - 8/05/10 Community Room, Edina City Hall 4pm Present: Bernice Amacher, Rick Fesler, John Keprios, Amy Kerber, Linda Kieffer, Bill McCabe, Lois Ring, Anne Spooner and Ruth Valgemae. Not present: Brad Benn, Dick Crockett. June 3, 2010 minutes amended and approved. CONTINUING BUSINESS Edina Promenade and Grandview Update Next year's dedication ceremony should be reduced to 1.5 hrs which is a more suitable time frame. Lois Ring reported that 200 ballots have come in so far and reported that The Plunge is currently in the lead. Ballots are located at Grandview, the Promenade ballot boxes near 70th at the gateway paths, Edina Art Center and the Senior Center. Lois Ring received payment for the total purchase of Time Piece by Dean Holzman from Dee Kennedy. She and Diana Hedges will proceed to get approval from City Council for these two gifts including MN Eco Turtle donated by EPAC Committee Members. Lois Ring received a comment from an Edina resident suggesting having sand underneath the MN Eco Turtle rather than grass and would look more natural. John Keprios responded that the sand would need to be contained and he will discuss this with Tom Shirley. Marketing and Promotion Linda Kieffer reported the Promenade Brochure has been reprinted and looks very good. Compliments go to Kaylin Martin for her work on photography and design of the new brochure. Brochures are located at Grandview Square, Galleria, Edina Art Center, City Hall desk and the Senior Center. Bernice Amacher will ask the library if ok to place there also. Edina Magazine's next issue in October will have a small article about EPAC. Lois Ring is communicating with the writer and they want to feature one sculpture. Hopefully they will feature a new up and coming sculptor in article. Linda Kieffer expressed that this will benefit the artist. Button sales are now at $395. Promotion thru EAC schedule continues. Linda Kieffer reports that the EPAC website has been updated with new pictures and information. EAC approval of EAC /EPAC Responsibilities document This has not been voted on yet. Bill McCabe will get it on the agenda. Lois Ring moved that EPAC be EAC members. Motion carried. Fund raising and Financial Update Lois Ring and Bill McCabe attended the Ways and Means Committee meeting. It was defined as a coordinating committee rather than an active committee and meets bi- monthly. Lois Ring moved that a card be printed that will promote donations and be enclosed in the water bill at Diana Hedges suggestion with the EPAC information on one side and the media studio information on the other. Motion approved. No further information on a Dick Blick donation. Lois Ring is assembling a marketing packet and is requesting input from Heather Randall King on the letter. Lind Kieffer and the committee reviewed changes made to EPAC's Polices and Procedures document. See complete document at end of minutes below. Linda Kieffer reported that Dick Crockett will no longer be attending meetings since he is not a regular EPAC member. Amy Kerber reported that she is in discussion with Tiffany & Co. to be a possible donor. They question how a donation will help their business. Amy Kerber will respond and continue the donation request. NEW BUSINESS Ruth Valgemae reported that, while the proposal for a commemorative sculpture of Kodiak, the police dog, has not yet been presented to the entire Crime Fund Board, Ken Rosland and Treasurer Denny Maetzold have expressed interest in pursuing the project. The Crime Fund would like further information on the costs involved, and would like to see the statue in a publicly accessible space. John Keprios commented that Braemar would be a logical location since it is near the dog cemetery and also accessible for children. Ruth Valgemae will follow up about artists. EPAC will only be able to assist with selection as no funds are available. EAC /EPAC is planning a° °joint fund raiser with Edina Fairview Auxillary Nov.4 at EAC. There will be a silent auction, artist demos with many items for sale, appetizers, wine and music -A very festive event. Monies raised will be divided between the three organizations. Linda Kieffer asked John Keprios about the 10,000 request from the city: John Keprios reported that Gordon Hughes declined to include the request for $10,000 from the City for the- 2011 -12 sculpture exhibition and other operational expenses. He further reported that it would be added in again to the budget requests that will be discussed before the City Council. In the June 2010 minutes it was stated that Dick Crockett would be notifying John Keprios of the MN Eco Turt/e%donat'ion to the City. In the future, when EPAC receives donations through Edina Community Foundation, the Foundation will send the donation to Edina Art Center. The Art Center will then proceed, to get approval from City Council as they do with all donations. Phil'Johnson will keep records of all donations. It was also stated that the Marguerite McNally funds were to be used for award money. Lois Ring presented gifts to Linda Kieffer for her many years of service to EPAC as this was her last meeting. Diana Hedges had taken beautiful photos of the Art Glass Window in City Hall and the committee was thankful to present an enlargement and several beautiful greeting cards that Diana Hedges had designed. Meeting adjourned at 5:25pm Next meeting will be Sept. 2, 2010 Minutes submitted by Anne Spooner EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES- revised 6/10 PURPOSE The purpose of the Edina Public Art Committee is to promote -and enhance the aesthetic quality of life in Edina through the enjoyment of art in the City's public spaces. GOALS AND DUTIES OF THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE I -Serve in an advisory capacity to the City in all public art- related matters (all city- sponsored pubic art projects shall require City Council approval). - Oversee execution of City- approved projects -Build awareness and -pride in community heritage and neighborhood identity. -Serve as a vehicle, for public education in the visual arts., - Encourage cooperation among public and private sectors, city government, and the arts community. -Make recommendations for creative fund- raising mechanisms to fund public art displays. - Promote. economic development through the arts. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS Art /Artwork --- -A visual, two or three dimensional creation including but not limited to sculpture, painting, murals, mosaics, glass works, photography, ,and crafts in clay, fiber, textiles, wood, metal; mixed media or any combination of forms of media. Public Places - - -All privately or publicly owned spaces (indoors or outdoors) which are accessible to the public. Public Arty - Art in public places. Public art may possess functional as well as aesthetic qualities and may include both permanent and temporary works. COMPOSI•TION AND STRUCTURE OF THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE The Edina-Public Art Committee (EPAC) shall be a standing committee of the Edina Art Center' Board. The Edina Art Center Board shall appoint the members of EPAC which Will consist of a minimum of seven persons ideally including: -at least one professional artist representative -at least one Edina Community Foundation representative -at least one member of the Edina Art Center Board -at least one community member with an interest in the arts -at least one staff liaison from the Edina Art Center (staff will not have voting privileges) One person may fulfill more that one of these requirements. When at all possible, the Chair of EPAC shall be a board member of the Edina Art Center and act as liaison to the Art Center. EPAC members shall receive no compensation for their services. FUNDING PROCEDURES The Edina Public Art, Committee shall receive private and corporate donations through the Edina Community Foundation's Public Art Fund. The City may periodically allocate funds as requested by EPAC and authorized by the City Council. The City shall collect donations via the quarterly utility bill which includes a provision for adding one, five, or ten or more (as determined by the individual) dollars to the actual dollar amount of the bill. The Edina Art Center shall initiate and oversee one fund- raising activity per year which benefits both the Art Center and the Edina Public Art Committee. Other fund - raising methods may be considered and approved at any time. SITE SELECTION FOR PUBLIC WORKS OF ART The site may' be public or private property and should be situated in such a way that it is` visible and accessible to the greatest possible number of members of the community. The artwork should not unnecessarily disrupt the flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Potential obstruction of growing trees /shrubs or future construction shall be taken into account. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF ARTWORK EPAC shall consider (but not be bound by any one of) the following guidelines in choosing works to recommend to the City Council for approval: -Does the artwork represent excellence in community design of public art? -Is it appropriate for public display? -Is it original, compelling, and creative work? -Does the artwork represent workmanship of the highest quality? -Does it raise awareness of community heritage or have historical value? -Does the piece appeal to a broad range of people? -Is the artwork true to the, original goals of the project? -Does the piece relate to the unique identity of the City? -Is the -piece safe for public interaction? -What is the likely maintenance requirement? -For outdoor work, is 'it durable under year- round weather conditions? CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR ARTIST SELECTION Artists chosen by EPAC shall'be active artists who are recognized in their field,either locally, regionally, nationally, or internationally. The body of work, exhibits /shows, awards, and sales history of artist candidates shall be considered. Artists may be contacted by the following methods: -Open Competition "Open competition for public art projects will be advertised in the local media, arts media, or local, regional, and national arts organizations. - Limited Competition Selected artists may be invited by EPAC to submit an RFQ (request for qualifications) for the creation of public art pieces. EPAC shall act as a jury and review and evaluate all submissions. (Additional members of the jury panel may be appointed from the community at the discretion of the committee). When appropriate, a limited number of finalists from the pool of submissions shall be chosen to interview. EPAC's final selection will be submitted to the City Council for approval. CONTRACTING WITH ARTISTS Upon completion of the art/artist selection process for a purchase, loan, or gift, the Community Foundations shall enter into a contractual agreement with the artist. The contract shall be signed by the artist before the work is installed. The contract may contain the following stipulations: -The art is original and does not infringe on any copyright. -The execution and fabrication of the art will be performed in a professional and timely manner. -The material will be free of defects in material and craftsmanship. -In the case of a loaned piece of art, the artist will be responsible for installing and insuring the work. -In the case of a purchased piece of art, the rights with respect to the work that the City shall acquire (i.e. copyright etc.) shall be specified. -A method and schedule of payment to the artist. -Final payment will be made only after review and acceptance by the City. - Conditions may warrant the removal or relocation of a piece (See "Deaccessions" Below). GIFTS, LOANS, AND COMMISSIONS/PURCHASES Gifts, loans, and purchases of public art may be accepted by the City if deemed appropriate by EPAC (see "Criteria for Selection of Artwork ") and approved by the City Council. All gifted work shall become property of the City. DEACCESSION The deaccession of a piece of public art should be a deliberate and seldom -used procedure. Works should not be disposed of simply because they are not currently in fashion or because their worth is called in to question by a few individuals. The following conditions are to be considered before any deaccession: -The City Council determines that the site is needed for another public use. -The work has deteriorated beyond a reasonable means of conservation. -The authenticity of the piece has been determined to be false or fraudulent. -The artwork possesses faults of design or fabrication that challenge its artistic merit. In the event of deaccession: -If appropriate, the artist shall be given the first option to purchase. -If not purchased by the artist, the work may be sold through auction, gallery resale, or direct bid by and individual or donated to another appropriate entity (i.e. museum, school etc.) - Proceeds from the sale are to be used for future public art projects. -If none of the above options are viable, the work may have to be destroyed. The recommendation to dispose of a work should be made by EPAC after careful review (which may include the services of a professional conservator) and a majority vote of the committee. Final approval for deaccession will be granted by the City Council. MAINTENANCE Permanent public works of art shall be maintained and preserved by the City in the best possible condition via regular inspection and cleaning. Repair may be necessary when the work needs to be returned to its original condition and integrity in the event of neglect, aging, damage or vandalism. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH Informing the public about a work of art is crucial to the success and public acceptance of the piece. When at all possible, the community should participate in the public art process. The following activities may encourage the public's awareness and involvement: - Presentations about the artwork to community groups, government agencies, citizen committees, local businesses, and corporate service groups. - Inclusion of community residents on the jury panel in the art/artist selection process. -Site visits by citizen representatives. - Community initiated neighborhood gateway projects. - Extensive media coverage. - School education programs which will incorporate visual and written.materials about public art in general and the importance of the public artwork in our community. Revised 6/10