Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-10-05_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 5, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of September 21, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL 2009 Water Fluoridation Quality Award Youth Exchange Resolution No. 2010 -90 ..nerica's Promise Award * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 21, 2010 and Work Sessions of September 21, 2010, September 28, 2010 and Joint Meeting With Three Rivers Park District September 29, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Request For Permit To Keep More Than Three Animals - (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve B. PUBLIC HEARING — New Intoxicating Liquor License — Pinstripes (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve C. PUBLIC HEARING — New Intoxicating Liquor License — Mozza Mia (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve Agenda/Edina City Council October 5, 2010 Page 2 D. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARINGS (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) 1. Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. A -213 & L -43 — Resolution No. 2010 -81 2. Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. A -214 & L -49 — Resolution No. 2010 -93 3. Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -356 — Resolution No. 2010 -82 4. St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -357 — Resolution No. 2010 -83 5. South Garden Estates Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -358 — Resolution No. 2010 -84 III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Change Order Edina Public Works Building — Improvement PW -1, Contract No. 4C: Site Concrete IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Second Reading Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Amending Section 900 Edina Liquor Code B Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Discussion * C. Resolution No. 2010 -86 Authorizing Safe & Sober Grant Agreement * D. Resolution No. 2010 -94 Restricting Parking Along West 58th Street From France To Xerxes * E. Resolution No. 2010 -95 revising speed limit on West 58th Street from France to Xerxes * F. Set Hearing (10/19/2010) Planning Items: 1. Final Development Plan, Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy, 6905 York Avenue 2. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning, YMCA, 7355 York Avenue * G. Resolution No. 2010 -89 Appointing Election Judges For General Election * H. Resolution No. 2010 -92 Authorizing Facsimile Signatures * I. Resolution No. 2010 -91 Setting the Interim City Manager Salary J. Resolution No. 2010 -85 Accepting Various Donations (Affirmative vote of four Council Members to approve) * K. Resolution No. 2010 -96 Approving Master Utility Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project * L. Resolution No. 2010 -97 Approving Cooperative Construction Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project * M. Amendment To Final Plan, Interlachen Maintenance Facility Agenda/Edina City Council October 5; ,2010 Page 3 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must, limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number-of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, Pre -List dated September 23, 2010, TOTAL $2,344,711.66; Pre -List dated September 30, 2010, TOTAL $562,137.29. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS A. Study Session Oct. 26th IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 -927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OFUPCOMING- MEETINGS /D .AYES /EVENTS ; t Tues Oct 5 Work Session — Enterprise Budgets & CIP Review Cont. 5:00 — 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 19 Work Session — Kathy Schmidlkofer — REDA Proposal 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCILCHAMBERS Tues Oct 26 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov 1 Work Session — Final Levy Review & 20100 Gen Fund Budget 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 2 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Mon Nov 8 CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 11 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Tues Nov 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 23 Study Session —to be determined 7:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Thur Nov 25 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Fri Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Tues Dec 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri - Dec 24 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S: HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Bennett, Brindle and Chair: Hovland. Commissioners Housh and Swenson were absent. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner. - Bennett for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented'. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 2010, APPROVED. Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded- by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the'Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for September 7, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -02 ADOPTED APPOINTING CEIL SMITH. INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett adopting Resolution No. 2010 -02 appointing Ceil Smith, Interim Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes.. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heather Worthington, Executive Director o e� j�IORPOP N -V I8BB 2009 WATER FLUORIDATION QUALITY AWARD ❑ No packet data ❑ Oral presentation ❑ Information coming RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -90 WELCOMING YOUTH EXCHANGE STUDENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, youth exchange programs promote understanding and tolerance between c tures; and WHEREAS, Edina High School welcomes foreign exchange students from around the world to spend one academic year learning in its classrooms; and WHEREAS, various youth exchange organizations promote international study and support these students through mandated and voluntary programs that enrich the students' cultural experience; and WHEREAS, Edina families open their homes and welcome these students to live as part of their family for one year; and WHEREAS, these foreign exchange students embark upon a unique and exciting journey, arriving with just a suitcase and a passport. These amazing young people bravely carry their heritage and values across the world with the hope of living, learning and sharing with an American host family. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council formally recognize these exchange students, host families, Edina school administrators and your exchange organizations for their dedication to peace and understanding through international cultural sharing, to encourage the sharing of ideas, values and experience among today's youth by exposing young scholars to leadership, civil society principles and community service. Dated: October 5, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 o e �y v' f�C�RPOPA'��9� �eaa AMERICA'S PROMISE AWARD No packet data Oral presentation [—] Information coming MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett and Brindle, and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall were Members Swenson and Housh. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the Council consent agenda with the exceptions of Item 111.6 ., 70th Street improvements, Contract No. ENG 10 -3; Improvement Nos. BA -367, SS -457, STS - 369, WM -503, TS-43 and 44, and L -57. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 7. 2010, AND WORK SESSIONS OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2010, AND SEPTEMBER 13, 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the minutes of the regular meeting of September 7, 2010, and work sessions of September 7, 2010 and September 13, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — three ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -15 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING SECTION 900 EDINA LIQUOR CODE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Assistant Manager Worthington presented the ordinance as revised based on the Council's direction. The Council discussed the suggested ordinance restrictions and supported requiring an on -site manager and police protection. It was noted that State statute specifically sets the fee at $200 and allows workers to serve if they are eighteen or older. The Council agreed to revise Section 900.13, Subd. 3, to indicate: The licensed premises shall be under the direct supervision..." and Subd. 4, to indicate: , The applicant shall provide..." City Attorney Knutson recommended Subd. 5, Age of Servers, also be revised to align with State law. The Council considered whether the temporary license should include behavioral points to assure the event was well run, successful, limited liability, and focused on the event rather than the alcohol being served. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. Public Testimony Jon Demars Victorsen, 7213 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council and opposed the amendment to the ordinance. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -15, amending the Edina City Code concerning liquor, as revised. The Council acknowledged that the community had decided to permit this type of temporary liquor license to certain charitable organizations, so the question before the Council was one of fairness and equal access for community organizations. It was noted that the revisions and added Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 21, 2010 language addressed expressed concerns. In addition, input had been received from Edina Chemical Health Partners which supported additional language mandating police security, at events for which a temporary intoxicating liquor license had been issued whiGh would be added te Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED (OCTOBERS, 2010) PINSTRIPES INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett continuing the public hearing to October 5, 2010, for the potential issuance of the Pinstripes intoxicating liquor license. Motion carried on rollcall vote — three ayes. *AWARD OF BID — INSTALLATION OF HOCKEY RINK LIGHTS AND POLES — PAMELA PARK AND WALNUT RIDGE PARK Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for installation of hockey rink lights and poles, Pamela Park and Walnut Ridge Park, to the recommended low bidder, Gunnar Electric, Inc. at $29,450.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — three ayes. AWARD OF BID — 70TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. ENG 10 -3; IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -367, SS -457, STS -369, WM -503, TS 43 AND 44, AND L57 Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle advised of work included in this project and that while minor improvements may be completed this fall, the majority of the project work would start next spring. It was noted the roundabout would be included in this project, and the landscaping plan would be available on the City's website to receive public input. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, awarding the bid for 70th Street improvements, Contract No. ENG 10 -3; Improvement Nos. BA -367, SS -457, STS -369, WM -503, TS-43 and 44, and L -57 to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, Inc. at $2,819,703.75. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -78 ADOPTED — PROVIDING FOR SALE OF $9,225,000 G.O. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, SERIES 2010A AND RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -79 PROVIDING FOR SALE OF $2,595,000 G.O. BONDS, SERIES 2010B Jonathan North, Ehlers & Associates, referenced the presale report and advised they were seeing the lowest interest rates since 1967, so it was a beneficial time to sell bonds. He noted the Series 2010A bonds would be used to refinance the 2002 bonds that were at 5.25 %. It was expected bids would be received under 2.5 %, resulting in a streag savings of approximately $800,000, or 9.8 %, over the life of the bonds. The Series 2010B bonds would be used for two purposes: $2.3 million for street reconstruction paid 100% by special assessments; and, $240,000 to finance equipment purchases levied in the 2010 budget under equipment certificates. Mr. North advised the City would be issuing bonds with two AAA ratings from Moody's and Standard and Poors. The sale would occur on October 19, 2010, and the closing on November 23, 2010. Mr. North stated a true interest cost of 2.5% was anticipated, and in conjunction with expected favorable construction bids, this was a good time for Edina to sell bonds. The Council discussed Series 2010B and asked questions of Finance Director Wallin and Mr. Houle about financing for equipment purchases, noting that in the past such purchases had been made from the general levy. Mr. Houle reviewed the City's equipment maintenance plan and explained that since 2008, large equipment purchases had been financed through equipment certificates. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 21, 2010 Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -78 providing for the sale of $9,225,000 general obligation capital improvement plan bonds, series 2010A. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -79 providing for the sale of $2,595,000 general obligation bonds, series 2010B. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -77 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -77 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -80 ADOPTED — DESIGNATING CITY MANAGER ON INTERIM BASIS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -80 appointing Ceil Smith, Interim City Manager, effective 4:30 p.m. October 6, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — three ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 1. 2010 APPROVED Assistant City Engineer Sullivan explained each revision the State had made to its Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and recommended Sections 4.C.1 and 4.D of the City's Multiway Stop Signs Traffic Policy be revised to be in conformance with the State's Manual. Mr. Sullivan presented the resident request for a multiway stop sign at 58th Street and Chowen Avenue received in April 2010. This request was reviewed by traffic safety staff on May 5, 2010, and recommended for denial. On May 18, 2010, the Council directed staff to review regulatory and cautionary signage for the 58th Street corridor from France to Xerxes Avenues. Mr. Sullivan presented staffs analysis of the corridor data collected and determination that neither intersection analyzed at Chowen & 58th and Beard & 58th, met the threshold. Mr. Sullivan presented other traffic management options noting 58th Street and Chowen Avenue intersection does not meet the criteria for a pedestrian crossing but was well above the threshold for sidewalks. In addition, 58th Street was a primary bike route in the City's Comprehensive Plan and bike lanes could be installed if on- street parking was removed. Mr. Sullivan indicated staff also recommended that all other regulatory and cautionary signage remain "as -is" along 58th Street from France to Xerxes Avenues and consideration of short -term measures to stripe bike lanes along 58th Street, remove parking along 58th Street, narrow the traffic lanes and reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians, and to not install painted or signed crosswalks since the Pedestrian Crosswalks Traffic Policy criteria was not met. If the Council approved the short-term solutions, staff would return with resolutions for "no parking" along 58th Street and signage for the 25 mph speed limit. Mr. Sullivan presented long -term solutions as part of a future reconstruction project to add curb and gutter, and sidewalk to one side of the 58th Street corridor, while retaining the bike lanes, no parking, and 25 mph speed limit. The Council thanked staff for its thorough recommendation and discussed the importance of enhancing walkability to assure safety of the City's children and attract new residents. It was noted that a parking study had not been conducted and input had not been received from the Bike Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 21, 2010 Edina Task Force or Edina Transportation Commission (ETC). Mr. Houle stated 3.5 feet was narrow but sufficient for a bike lane since there was no curb and gutter. With regard to the ETC, Mr. Houle indicated it had been Council's practice for these matters to be considered by the traffic safety staff and if the Council would like the ETC involved, perhaps a different process would be recommended. The Council noted the ETC was created to review traffic issues and discussed whether the multiway stop sign request should be referred to the ETC for a recommendation. Mr. Houle stated prior to setting policy for the ETC to consider traffic safety issues, he would recommend staff research past review systems that worked well to assure the traffic criteria was addressed in a non - emotional manner. The Council discussed current policy for staff to determine which requests were reviewed by traffic safety staff and that the ETC had been used for specific project recommendations. It was noted that in this case staff had provided a comprehensive report and viable short-term solutions. Member Bennett stated there may be other short-term solutions, such as neighborhood education, and spoke in support of using the ETC for the purpose it was created. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to refer the request for a multiway stop sign at 58th Street and Chowen Avenue and request from the City of Richfield for regulation of a shared street to the ETC for review and recommendation and to approve the remainder of the September 1, 2010, traffic safety report. Henry Parkhurst, 5733 Chowen Avenue S., addressed the Council and stated support for staff's short-term solutions and requested additional calming measures, including the installation of a pedestrian crosswalk signage since three of the required warrants were met. Dan Dauth, 5720 Chowen Avenue S., addressed the Council and stated support for installation of a pedestrian crosswalk at 58th Street and Chowen Avenue. The Council and staff discussed potential locations for a pedestrian crosswalk and staff's determination that 58th Street and Chowen Avenue had not met warrants for a pedestrian crosswalk so installation would create a false sense of safety. However, once 58th Street was reconstructed in 2014, sidewalks and a crosswalk may be appropriate as a long -term solution. Mr. Houle advised that referring the matter to the ETC at this point would delay installation of short- term solutions to November if weather permits. If approved, the Council would act on "no parking" resolutions at its next meeting, and short-term solutions would be instituted the first week of October. Member Bennett made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve staffs recommendation for short-term solutions for 58th Street and Chowen Avenue and refer it to the ETC for additional review and recommendation, to refer the request from the City of Richfield for regulation of a shared street to the ETC for review and recommendation, and to approve the remainder of the September 1, 2010, traffic safety report. Mayor Hovland stated his opposition to both the motion more immediate action on short-term solutions and a full should be referred to the ETC. Ayes: Bennett Nays: Brindle, Hovland Amendment failed. Ayes: Bennett Nays: Brindle, Hovland Original motion failed. Page 4 and amendment because he supported Council review to determine issues that Minutes /Edina City Council /September 21, 2010 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Mayor Hovland, accepting the traffic safety report of September 1, 2010. Ayes: Brindle, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Member Bennett requested a copy of the correspondence from the City of Richfield. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 9, 2010, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $179,634.07; Communications Fund $246.96; General Debt Service Fund $5,848.49; City Hall Debt Service $1,000.00; Working Capital Fund $85,877.01; Equipment Replacement Fund $1,269.68; Art Center Fund $4,181.42; Golf Dome Fund $1,273.42; Aquatic Center Fund $7,514.78; Golf Course Fund $9,233.48; Ice Arena Fund $257,416.08; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $18,366.49; Liquor Fund $270,315.66; Utility Fund $417,286.14; Storm Sewer Fund $3,311.24; PSTF Agency Fund $7,896.18; Payroll Fund $8,341.48; TOTAL $1,279,012.58 and for approval of payment of claims dated September 16, 2010, and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $88,280.13; Communications Fund $1,671.32; Working Capital Fund $13,049.90; Equipment Replacement Fund $56,026.71; Art Center Fund $995.04; Aquatic Center Fund $34.77; Golf Course Fund $24,957.13; Ice Arena Fund $2,874.92; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $7,773.71; Liquor Fund $135,345.53; Utility Fund $46,157.04; Storm Sewer Fund $3,151.78; Recycling Fund $37,683.00; PSTF Agency Fund $1,490.74; TOTAL $419,491.72; and, Credit Card Transactions dated July 27, 2010 — August 25, 2010; TOTAL $8,781.44. Motion carried on rollcall vote — three ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 5, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 21, 2010, meeting available. Page 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA PLANNING COMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 S:OS P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle and Mayor Hovland. Members Housh and Swenson were absent. Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief; Laurene Draper, Police Communications Supervisor; Joyce Repya, Associate Planner; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Public Works Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Director of Marketing & Communications; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose of the meeting was to review the 2011 Proposed Enterprise Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Programs for 2011 -2015. Mayor Hovland left the meeting at 5:25 p.m., returning at 5:55 p.m. The Council conducted a review of the following funds and capital improvement programs: Community Development Block Grant: Ms. Repya reviewed the proposed budget and noted the CDBG Fund was on a different fiscal year than the City. Review of the Human Services portion of this fund by the Human Rights and Relations Commission was briefly discussed by Council, and it was noted that no CIP existed for the fund. Police Special Revenue Fund: Chief Long and Police Communications Supervisor Draper explained E911, Federal forfeitures and state forfeitures, the source of dollars for this fund. The impact of providing dispatch service to Golden Valley and the future capital purchases needed were discussed. Communications: Director Bennerotte noted the future of the franchise fees may change when the franchise ordinance renewal occurs, and she briefly outlined plans for re- design of the City's web site slated for 2011. HRA: Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the role of the HRA in re- development in the City. He briefly talked about the TIF districts still in place, noting that several of the Promenade improvements were funded using TIF funds. Utilities: Director Houle reviewed the following: the rate study, Public Works Facility, and proposed improvement slated for 2011 in the Utility CIP. Inflow /Infiltration was briefly discussed and the potential impact of future surcharges from Met Council. Consensus was to schedule a work session for a Regional Economic Development presentation on October 19, 2010 at 5:30 p.m.. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 5, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA PLANNING COMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 5:05 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle Housh, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. '"FS Housh and Swenson we Fe absent. Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; John Keprios, Park Director; Tom Shirley, Centennial Lake Manager; Ann Kattreh, Edinborough Park Manager, Susie Miller, Assistant Manager Edinborough Park; Diana Hedges, Edina Art Center Director; Steve Grausam, Liquor Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the purpose of the meeting was to review the 2011 Proposed Enterprise Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Programs for 2011 -2015 and to approve the purchase of equipment for the Police Department. SERVICES, EQUIPMENT & TRAINING PURCHASED FROM SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. Assistant Manager Worthington presented the purchase request for add -on hardware /software from Sungard /OSSI. She advised the purchase was for services, equipment and training necessary to complete the transition of providing dispatching services for Golden Valley. Sungard has been the City's vendor and was the sole provider. Per the previously approved contract with Golden Valley all costs will be reimbursed by Golden Valley. The equipment purchase must be authorized by September 30, 2010, in order to make the January 2011 deadline for serving Golden Valley. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh approving the purchase of add -on services, equipment and training from Sungard Public Sector Inc. in the amount of $55,793.73. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Ms. Worthington stated as the budgets and capital improvement plans were reviewed, only new items in the 2011 -2015 CIP would be highlighted. The Council conducted a review of the following funds and capital improvement programs: Ms. Worthington said that the budgets and CIPs for Centennial Lakes and Edinborough Park have historically been combined; however, going forward staff was attempting to separate them into separate cost centers. She briefly spoke of the possibility of using possible franchise fees revenue to augment the Centennial Lakes and Edinborough Trust Fund as well as to cover street lighting. It was noted that this was a discussion for a future date. Centennial Lakes: Centennial Lakes Manager Shirley noted that there was an on -going need for paver replacement at Centennial Lakes. Additionally, next year he planned some signage improvement and painting a portion of the amphitheater. Edinborough Park: Edinborough Park Manager Kattreh described the intention of converting the existing admissions office into a concession stand and to move guest services to a better location where it could be combined with a birthday party check -in site. Potential use of the pool and fitness area and the agreement in place with the Edina Park Plaza and hotel were discussed. Edina Art Center: Director Hedges noted the 2011 proposed CIP would be for improvement in the permeable surface and some repairs. In 2012, she stated improvement to the parking lot and kilns were planned. Ms. Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /September 21, 2010 Hedges asked about the funding request of the Public Art Committee to continue their public art Promenade Sculpture program. She stated this would be a temporary fix that would keep the program going for two years. Ms. Hedges expressed her hope that the water billing donations could be increased to about $5,000.00 annually from the current $3,500.00. Liquor Fund: Director Grausam stated the York Avenue Store would be remodeled during 2011 and paid for from cash flow. He added that normally stores have about a seven year life before updating was necessary. After the York Avenue remodel, there was just generalized maintenance planned for several years throughout the system. Mr. Grausam noted replacing neon signage with LED signage would be cost effective and "green ". Future transfers from the liquor fund were discussed, as well as potential legislative issues surrounding municipal liquor stores. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 5, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT COMMISSION HELD AT SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Members of the Three Rivers Park District Commission in attendance were: Chair Larry Blackstad, and Commissioners Marilynn Corcoran, Rosemary Franzese, Barbara Derus Kinsey, Dale Woodbeck, and Sara Wyatt. Three Rivers Park District staff in attendance were: Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning; Cris Gears, Superintendent; Boe Carlson, Associate Superintendent; Don DeVeau, Director of Planning and Development; Jonathan Vlaming, Chief of Planning, and Ciara Schlichting, Planner with Bonestroo. Attending from Edina's staff was John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director. PRESENTATION MADE — NINE MILE REGIONAL TRAIL Park and Recreation Director Keprios welcomed all to the joint work session and explained the purpose of tonight's meeting was to formally present study results on the Nine Mile Creek regional trail and provide an opportunity for the Edina City Council to ask questions of the Three Rivers Park District Commissioners and staff. He advised that a public hearing would be scheduled at a future date and encouraged residents to submit questions in writing for response by staff. Mr. Keprios thanked all who had participated in this process and acknowledged the attendance of Edina Park Board Members in the audience. Mr. Keprios recapped the ten -year process under which this trail had been considered and support of the Edina City Council for the Three Rivers Park District to implement a regional trail corridor and complete an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for potential segments within the City of Edina. Three Rivers Park District Senior Manager of Planning Grissman welcomed all to the meeting and provided a presentation detailing the project background; maps depicting the District's regional trail system, creek -based and road -based routes for review and consideration; and, next steps to take. She stated the intent was to develop one preferred route through Edina. Ms. Grissman displayed graphs that summarized resident survey results that identified 86% of respondents indicated a need for walking and bike trails; 66% indicated a need for natural areas and wildlife habitat; 64% ranked park and recreational facilities as being the most important; and, 66% indicated a willingness to fund walking and biking trails with additional tax dollars. Following a presentation of the City's 2007 Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and Plan maps, Ms. Grissman advised of the composition and role of the Community Assessment Team (CAT), which was established by the City to review all routes under consideration. The CAT also gathered and prioritized information related to social, technical and economic factors, and conducted a voluntary environmental assessment. The voluntary environmental assessment concluded that potential environmental impacts were addressable in design, permitting, construction, and operation phases so an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not warranted. She explained wetland impacts identified in the environmental assessment and how the impacts would be mitigated within the immediate area. With regard to wildlife, it was determined the only impacted regulated species was the Blandings Turtle and that potential affect would be addressed, if needed. Ms. Grissman reviewed the opportunities available for public input and indicated that all public comments had been compiled and summarized. Of the 118 comments received indicating support for the trail, only one preferred the road -based route. Comments expressing objections were based on the costs being too high, environmental concerns, the trail being unsafe for non - trail users, and that priority should not be given to recreational trails. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 29, 2010 Ms. Grissman described the alignment for each segment of a creek -based route and displayed pictures depicting different types of trail construction including boardwalks. She then described the alignment of each segment of a road -based route and displayed examples of road -based trails. Ms. Grissman stated the third alternative was no trail within Edina, creating a gap in the regional trail system. Ms. Grissman presented the considerations determined by the CAT that the most important items to be considered were the number of adjacent homes, distance of the home to the trail, driveway /roadway crossings, availability of right -of -way, and what the trail would cost. A chart was displayed that detailed each of CAT's findings including pros and cons for a creek -based route and a road -based route. Ms. Grissman advised that if a route was not found in Edina, the District's funds would be directed to other park projects and access to the Edina High School complex north of Highway 62 would continue to be on sidewalks along Gleason and Tracy Avenues. With regard to project costs, Ms. Grissman stated that a creek -based route was estimated at $20 million and a road -based route was estimated at $17 million. Operations and maintenance costs for the entire regional trail was $185,000 annually regardless of type of route. She noted that about 20 -25% of the project cost was for the two bridges over Highways 62 and 100. Ms. Grissman reviewed financing options for capital costs and partnership opportunities and indicated it was not anticipated to raise local property taxes to fund these costs. Operation and maintenance costs were funded from the District's general operating fund that included property taxes and funds from the Metropolitan Council. Ms. Grissman explained the approval process through the Edina Park Board, Edina City Council, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, School District, and finally the Three Rivers Park District. She stated that if the project moved forward implementation steps would include: completion of a master plan, cooperative trail agreement, securing of trail easements, grant applications, and once funding was in place construction would commence. The federal grant application for funding in 2015 and 2016 was due June of 2011 so a project decision would be needed from the Edina City Council by March of 2011. If the project were not approved by that point, the trail segment would be delayed by an additional two years. ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION HELD Mayor Hovland commented that the regional trail was one of the most important issues to face Edina and that the Council was committed to analyze all of the data, gather comments, and analyze the facts before reaching a conclusion. He indicated this topic would be on the Council's October 5, 2010, meeting agenda for discussion of the process and to consider whether the matter should be referred to the Park Board and other entities for analysis and recommendation. Mayor Hovland recognized the attendance of CAT members and expressed the City's appreciation for their contribution. He described the steps that would be followed and emphasized that the Council was mindful and sensitive to the resident's interests and would continue to be so throughout the process. He indicated that when the matter was finished, he would like the City to say they had worked on it as a community and regardless of the outcome would remain a community. The Council raised the issue of a 35 mph speed limit for bicycles on the trail. Associate Superintendent Carlson advised that the Three Rivers Park District does not have an ordinance to set an arbitrary speed limit. Rather, it was based on utilizing trails under a manner of control for existing conditions. He indicated that all trails were multi -use. The Council asked if the Three Rivers Park District would fund the preferred route whether it was creek -based or road - based. Superintendent Gears stated the Three Rivers Park District Board Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 29. 2010 does fund different types of trails, both on- and off -road. In this case, the Board would review whatever route the City preferred, the cost in relationship to other District projects, and make a decision on funding. Three Rivers Park District Board Chair Blackstad explained that regardless of trail location, the intended funding was a federal grant covering 80% of the cost and requiring a 20% match from other entities, some of which could come from the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget. Mr. Carlson advised that a creek -based trail may score better with a federal grant and whether road- or creek - based, funding may include federal, state, and other entity funding. With regard to maintenance of trails, Mr. Carlson indicated the Three Rivers Park District was responsible for the trail improvements and maintenance. Mr. Gears advised that in addition to regional rail corridors, the Three Rivers Park District also had more than 200 miles of paved trails, many built under conditions similar to Edina's alignments. Both operations and maintenance costs were paid through a separate capital fund, and the District maintained a pavement condition data base to assure all trails were in a safe condition for users. The Council asked whether the EAW addressed potential impacts to nearby homes from heaving construction equipment during boardwalk installation. Ciara Schlichting, Bonestroo Planner, stated they recommend that construction in wetland areas occur during the winter when the ground is frozen and potential for impact was greatly minimized. Director of Planning and Development DeVeau stated the District had no information that led them to believe construction of boardwalks in summer or winter would impart any construction impacts to residential or adjoining properties. He advised that boardwalks do not use extremely deep footings. The Council discussed the timing of construction and asked if 2015 would be the earliest date for project commencement. Ms. Grissman stated there might be some immediate opportunities in some locations if the trail project was done concurrently with road reconstruction projects contained in the City's CIP. With regard to financing, Mr. Gears stated the District may borrow money to construct earlier than receipt of federal grant funds in 2015 or 2016. It was indicated that during summer sporting events, the parking lots at Edina City Parks along the proposed routes were oftentimes full. The need for parking was discussed by the Council, and the question arose whether additional parking lots would be constructed. Ms. Grissman stated the District believed existing parking lots in City parks, on- street parking, and other parking infrastructure could be capitalized so they would not anticipate constructing new parking lots Chief of Planning Vlaming indicated that over one -half of regional trail users lived within three - fourths of a mile from the trail. Thus, they would not expect most trail users to drive a vehicle to and from the trail system. In addition, the District's maps identify locations of parking lots and designated trailheads, as preferred by local authorities. Mr. Vlaming assured the Council that the creek -based trail would have sufficient points of access. The Council asked how much boardwalk was being contemplated with a creek -based route, especially in segments 9 and 11, and whether that information would be available in advance of the Council's decision. Ms. Grissman advised of the off -road trail segments that would incorporate a boardwalk and explained that the exact percentage would be determined during the design and development stage. Mr. Vlaming provided a detailed description of locations where boardwalk was proposed. With regard to the height of the boardwalk above the surface and vertical dimension including railing, Ms. Grissman explained that level of detail would be determined during the design and development stage and would depend on the regulatory agency since requirements vary. She stated in general, boardwalks were constructed two to three feet above the ordinary high water mark with 42 inches from the decking to the railing. Mr. Vlaming suggested a good example of boardwalks would be the Luce Line Regional Trail where the boardwalk could not be seen from the road and vice versa. Ms. Grissman explained that boardwalk would only be constructed in designated wetlands. The trail would be built at grade if Page 3 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /September 29. 2010 located in a floodplain. Mr. Gears stated the District would prepare a map that identified areas where boardwalks were anticipated at designated wetlands. The Council next addressed screening between the trail and private property and asked if it was the responsibility of the District or homeowner. Mr. Carlson stated the Dakota Trail was an existing railroad corridor, adding in many cases the private property had encroached on the railroad easement. In some areas, the railroad sold property to the private property owner so they could improve their property. Mr. Carlson explained with the Dakota Trail project District staff had met with each resident who had concerns relative to privacy or limited easement areas. Cooperatively, District staff and property owners identified vegetative or fencing solutions. The District paid for all pediments, fencing, and improvements made within the right -of -way. In some instances the property owner chose to do something (plantings or fences) on their own property and in that case the property owner paid for the improvement. Mr. Carlson reviewed the screening options available that included berming, a variety of vegetation, and wooden board -on- board or split rail fencing. Mr. Carlson explained that Three Rivers Park District was responsible for downed tree removal and would work cooperatively with City staff if they became aware of a maintenance issue. He noted that trail signage included guidelines, courtesy messages, and contact telephone numbers. The Council asked the District to address how it handled its current debt and additional debt for this segment of trail. Mr. Gears stated the District had a ten -year project forecast and within that ten -year window, was anticipating a major expenditure for trails within first -tier suburbs. Each year, the District borrowed money for capital projects, but the District had also been able to retire bonds each year so it balanced with bonds being sold. In this case, the District would not borrow $20 million, since a federal grant would cover 80% of the costs, phased construction would be used, and other funding sources were available to lower the District's contribution. A discussion ensued regarding drafting a competitive federal grant application. Mr. Carlson advised that grant applications receive a higher score if the project was within a first -tier suburb with a high density. Other features that score well were tying in key elements to increase pedestrian flow such as pedestrian crossings over roadways and creating connectivity to schools and churches in areas with limiting freeway system boundaries. Mr. Gears stated funding agencies also looked at the number of street crossings managed or mitigated, usability and safety for the user, and whether the project was park/trail oriented or transportation oriented. Mr. Carlson commented that another component that scored well was the organization's ability to bring "money to the table" and sufficiently match money. He indicated the Three Rivers Park District was well positioned to receive a grant for this project because of its broad tax base. The Council noted bicycling was a popular activity in Edina. They asked if directness of the proposed route was a consideration. Chair Blackstad stated that was a consideration because if a route was not typically bicyclists would use the streets. He explained if this trail was not federally funded, the Three Rivers Park District would consider how this segment fit its priorities. It was noted that if the Edina segment was not constructed that would create a missing link for the entire region, not just the Three Rivers Park District. Three Rivers Park District staff was asked to provide the City with additional information on the percentage of boardwalk being contemplated, elevation and height of the boardwalk, sight lines from abutting properties, and building material that would mitigate noise impacts. Potential impact to butting residential property values was discussed. Mr. Carlson clarified that the issue was the proximity of the home to the trail, not the proximity of the property line to the trail. He advised the District had found that abutting property owners had no issues regarding Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 29, 2010 safety or trash, and that was evident because there were no instances of police reports. Mr. Carlson stated their police department submits quarterly reports on every call received that identified the location and type of call. Those quarterly reports were reviewed by staff and the Board to determine if there were trends. Mr. Carlson advised that the largest complaint, system wide, was trail -on -trail activities like conflicts between a bicyclist and dog walker and patrons not obeying regulatory signage. In addition, there had been no serious accidents between bicyclist and pedestrian. The Council asked Ms. Grissman to provide internet links with respect to impact on property values as well as a study from Indiana on homes located near trails. Chair Blackstad referenced a study conducted in Hennepin County that found a positive correlation in home values if located along a trail that was equivalent to adding a fireplace or bedroom. With regard to public access to this data, Ms. Grissman stated the assessment findings were posted to the District's website, and they would research the study mentioned by Chair Blackstad because it may be relevant. The Council asked whether the police call data captured calls made to local police departments. Mr. Carlson stated the District's calls were dispatched through Hennepin County and if identified on a Hennepin County or Three Rivers Park District facility, the District took note of that call. The District may not get the call information if a local police officer responded or the call was not routed by the Hennepin County dispatch system, but the District police chief had a good working relationship with municipal police chiefs. Ms. Grissman and Mr. Keprios indicated that correspondence received from residents would be posted to the District and City websites within the next week or two. Three Rivers Park District Commissioner Corcoran advised of the District's "safety on wheels" that patrolled trails, created a "presence," and could help if something happened. She reviewed several areas in the metropolitan area where homes existed or had been constructed near regional trails and that when listed for sale; the trail proximity was highly marketed. Three Rivers Park District Commissioner Kinsey felt a key finding was that a road -based trail had 30 road crossings compared to 11 road crossings with a creek -based route. She stated she understood that a creek -based route was not popular with a number of homeowners, but the number of road crossings addressed a safety issue, which might also be a consideration to gain funding. The Council indicated it desired to have an effective voice in the final design process to assure impacts were minimized, noting three homes would be within 25 feet of a creek -based trail. Mr. DeVeau explained that every city had a different process so the District would ask for that acknowledgement from Edina on final design was welcomed. With regard to the City providing the trail easement to the Three Rivers Park District, Mr. Gears advised an easement was not ownership of property but the right to use the property for an exclusive use. He stated that having the easement would be directly tied to the District's ability to gain funding. Mr. Gears stated the District wanted to assure an investment of this size had a long life, and the term of the easement would have to be at least as long as the term for debt payments, typically 20 -25 years. The Council asked whether a conditional easement was an option in case trail funding was not obtained. Mr. Carlson assured the Council that the Three Rivers Park District would have no need to retain the easement if the trail was not constructed and would turn it back to the City. The Council asked about the contemplated width in segment 7 if a road -based route was selected. Ms. Grissman explained that in segment 7 the shoulder width would be narrowed or parking removed, and the design would have to still meet engineering and MSA standards. The Council discussed the proposed trail location in Walnut Ridge Park near the hockey rink and impact to trees. Mr. Gears stated the District would work with Edina to minimize impact to natural Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 29. 2010 resources, trees, and close proximity to park amenities. Mr. Keprios stated at one point that trail alignment went through the south end of Walnut Ridge Park but was moved to the north because of water table and park use issues. He indicated the placement of this trail section might be worth revisiting. Chair Blackstad noted there had been no police reports on conflict with children crossing the trails. Mr. Keprios questioned application deadlines of which the Council should be mindful. Mr. Gears stated the District now had funding for first -tier trail construction in its ten -year plan, and the Edina project was high on the list for funding in the near term. He referenced the aforementioned federal grant application deadline of June of 2011, meaning a Council decision on a preferred route was needed by late February or early March. If not determined by that time, the District would apply for federal grant funds for another project and delay the Nine Mile Creek trail by two years. Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Watershed District Administrator, advised that the creek bank stabilization field assessment was funded in the Watershed District's 2011 budget. The streambank reconstruction would occur over several winter seasons, 2013 -2015, to minimize impact to soils and vegetation. He stated the Watershed District wanted to coordinate its streambank project with any trail construction to minimize disturbance. The Council complimented the Three Rivers Park District staff on its informative presentation and cooperative work with Edina's residents to gain their input. Chair Blackstad stated the District Board appreciated the opportunity to meet with the City Council and looked forward to working with Edina's Park Board and staff. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the joint work session adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 5, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Audio Copy of the September 29, 2010, Work Session available. Page 6 ,ane REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item II.A. From: Jeff Long Chief of Police ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Request For Permit To Keep More Than Three Animals ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the requested permit for more than three dogs and cats at 6529 McCauley Trail. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Edina City Ordinance 300.15 reads "No more than three dogs or cats in aggregate which are over six months of age shall be kept or harbored at any place in the City, except in a pet shop, animal hospital or commercial kennel, unless a permit has been issued pursuant to this subsection by the Council' On August 4, 2010 Solvei Wilmot of the Edina City Department of Health was contacted by Hennepin County and asked to meet at 6529 McCauley Trail in Edina to evaluate the interior conditions of the home. During her visit, Ms Wilmot discovered the household maintained 8 pets, three (3) dogs and five (5) cats. She witnessed one of the dogs defecate on the couch. She also observed a number of soiled pet mats in the dining room. The carpets of the dining room, stairwell, living room, TV room, Master bedroom, den and, basement bedroom were heavily soiled with pet urine, animal fur and dirt. The family was notified of the process by which to apply for a pet permit. The Juodis' have submitted their application for the pet permit and notice was sent to surrounding residents and to date (September 28, 2010) the Police Department has not received any response in opposition or in support. The family included letters of support from two medical doctors citing medical /therapeutic benefits for the family to be granted the pet permit and two veterinarians addressing the family's care of their pets (see attached). By September 13, 2010 there had been major improvements in the living conditions and cleanliness of the residence. The carpets had been cleaned, cat boxes provided for the cats were being maintained and the family had contracted with a company to help train the dogs. b The City has not received any animal related calls for service at the Juodis residence. Given the recent improvement in the living conditions of the residence and the medical recommendations, the presence of the pets would be in the family's best interest. This recommendation is made provided that the home is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and that there are no complaints regarding the animals at the residence. Continued monitoring by Animal Control is recommended on a schedule to be determined in conjunction with the family, in addition, as the pets pass, they should not be replaced and'the family should become in compliance with the ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Letters of support from the applicants. 1 ,y yY.Jy1 5 w, F o ` = Edina rediatrics rt 7025 Fieoee A \ti S Suit a 100• Fdine, MN 5541 (952) 92777337 (PHDS7 • Fes (9.52) 427 8610' ' a i. i. Au -wt ltdiZQIU • 77iis letter 3s being w•ritteo 6A, of xy piieat Kathryn Olivia Meix� ger, age 19 L hati a Imown Katie suite het tcy end have gotten to lQtow her v well over this tim ;nod. Kan is an ex ba t and%harmm 1 _ an has do"na' veryvell academically" cepdoaally gh S Yom?$' i throghouhei mi a and high school years. Slie, has been accepted a9 a scJtolarshp student to the l Tmveisfty of S 7 iijmas; in St. Paul far this fall term: She hla4 ambitions to a pre Mail '� major sand to follow in the footsteps of several of her tamily membeis. She ties lied to overcome 1 a condition of Asperper'�S syndrome, a vanant of alrttsin - This condiLOn is a double -edged scrod j foi her Ou the one hand she ties the typical biLhanced intellect that tames type of "savant" aptitude, byi oa the other bond social skills and, specifically. tho ah>ility to Dope wrath aqy changes to Toitittd of 8ny land ere a constant challenge Her ability to focus od her stidics can e>rd would be seveialy inpaow by any ajg Acimt change m i< r &6a environment This would urclude the, rem of what she paceiye5 as her best Giends and goAipenioi , lies petq Her conversations to date have been mimated•and have focusod largely on these aaimaLs v'. aotlier to aagei withttit this condition arould compartmtali�ie the pets aito A small OW OW ,. large life's picture.' Katie holds her pets is far greateregaid She sees tht 'worid through tteu c3 i4s long m the status quo is aiaiiitained, her G%U life is hnperfect balance ` I -e7 mother >§ the only other piece of this pumc that mamtaius ha ixlu hiuitmi.. As long as thisilieleace is maintained, I fee] she can achieve monumental summ to her academic endeaKo I cannot ;' ; emphasis flit ite ;d fa constancy in her li%. Niiheut it, at a will nut be abed "4o cape ann l camiot predict how severely, she "wits react and wlthdraw, from life. Please fake this iz[o a' consideration iegardmg the tvodis f ihlly, r iak u - Vela Thcrosou, i►� ' 7 d 19 deceass e ; do rzTs4enTun WdOS�:e * OTOZimir u 'E� Sri ti zao Irst street 5w , - Rodies� )Kumgata 558 :' 307:264 =7311. Karns M•�oPt+a �• �pmtauoat of.PhYsiwtMedieme RE: Bdvrasd, A 7uo83s; M.D. IvlCd &247 35' DOB; 151.5 =21 To Whom It May Concem: ! fq ., a saerectuitry He also has tsad Dr. h4s b6 suffered a spinal resesion • chionlc pain'su�ce ibe surgery, � , He.contacttjd my pfiice today to repoci.that i i i>c removed by foal authorities. He is ygy saddened by that possibilityaskcd that I submit a letter on his behalf _ _ - � • ' Dr, yuodis reports that he fuids substantial comfort being m the company of his pets. i Ia pyexperieneq I bane had'a number ofp t9e, with spinal cord injury and chronic pant who have felt very much the same as Dr. Juodis. Please consider aotking pvitli the ]uodis family to accomnodite their wish to rete,n their pees; r Sincerely,• . , kurtis M-- Hope, MD. ICIWi:jcn - _ c August 10, 2010 C of£diika Regarding: Sandra Juo& of 6539 mcCwoy Tro, wgsk t ilfieq iffy S5439 and her pets, kufy.FS DSH born 7/14!1005. Niles ASV DSH barn d121/d 003, ' 13eAa FS DSN barn d~✓✓1i100d, Saslaa FS DSN ham 7JI i/20QJ, J'icasso MN ' born S/l /200d Lola FS ChlhualnW Terr',ier cross bore 33/2004 Iliiad, FS YorA�shfre Teirier, born 11J3kd 65 and N? n ltfalteae Pooa+le cross To Whom It May Conceca: i it bias come to my attention that the JmAIs household is being cited for violation of pet ownerstup v1e� In the city of Edrne, l am wnnng this leper on the fainilys behalf rag iodg the care ai d oynerstnp of their demeslia pets' Juodis .has been a client of the Edina Pet Hospital since 2003 and has been an Ms exemplary pet owner with regard to the care of her fhmily's pets, 14Is Juodis spays and ll, :' • fit ►ilcrs }iei pets at the appmpnate agey follows:througl with parasite cheslce mod ' standards of ire rccoaiaieaded for preventive health care, maintains euRent rabies v%cmationa for all of her pets, and is compliant frith all kcalthsare r�couuriendationy for her pets that are provided by thin chnlc, Tha ]w pets e?� all ue_ll behaved, easy to manage and are a diemely well, cared foi. ' Inmy opinlon, it would be a tragedy hi the Juodis pets to be rC'- M`ov`W from then home Please Contact me if there is ariy further informat<oa you may need from onr ofiee. in ely, Roxanne Mahan, DVM ' ' Ldi"nn Pet Nospitel 7701 Cahill Rd." Edina. Nit- 55439 .i 452- 929 -5800 mahon a edinaoethosoital.coin S - t9soees2so Qzosauu.!N io F -4jsuantun Nd4Sob OToZ c2 Verb r ,r Per nbof li P.A:' ' '' 7701 GMiLL ROAD fi01NA. WN6S499 TEtgPMONE: 952 829- SB00 FN7h 892 920_ -1229 , n C tyufMi . 1 R6, jA- ag: 5m�:&,dle 6f 6ii9 McCauley TmOii less FdinQC MN SS43�► wrd leer pe(s MistyFS D� b6 711412003, filesW DSH60A 61211200 , Bella FS DSI`f born 6WO041 atlia�FSDSHb&h"312004')W A:& h Te�ri�►'b�i '612065 q! d fiory FS ll�altese Poodle cress barn 8 /1301004 . f To Whom R May Caocern. I din writing oa behalf of the Jaod�s fanuly The Inodis t�mily liar been bringtng'their petdrto tfie Ediaa�Pet Hospit stpc'e August ]2, 2U0 .� have subsequeaily beai bringing their pp' i W our hospital every year for t�etr annual exams end'vaccules ' Aloag with "staying tip to date on eaatov and vacxines, the Juodis' have sought medical trestmeIIf - when any of thblt pets have been ailing We, at tfie Edina Pet Hdspiial truly feel ibat the J uodus' ire $exernp"'y and i arculd be deeply saddened should their- pds be .trmoved from theirome: 1.11 SincCrely.� . _ �• t f. I Uaiuel Sheliush,DVM s'.! C.0 I8S06EBZS6 aosauujtj 30zFs�aniurt ♦F _ Yd44e4.otb EZ o Le ��� i) 0 • l�roRPOPA �/ 1866 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item II. B. From: Debra Mangen ® Action City Clerk Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing — New Intoxicating License - Pinstripes ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving New On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Sunday On -Sale Liquor License to Pinstripes Inc. dba as Pinstripes, for the period beginning October 5, 2010 and ending March 31, 2011. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Pinstripes Inc. dba as Pinstripes at 5849 Gallagher Drive has applied for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. Edina Code requires a public hearing before the issuance of a new liquor license. The proper notification has been published in the Edina Sun Current. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation with no negative findings. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. Attachment: Sgt. Mendel's memorandum BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ?_ ON -SALT; INTOXICATING: LIQUOR OR ON -SALE WINE, LICENSE Establishment: Pinstripes Inc. License: On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" On 08/02/10, Pinstripes Inc. made application to the City of Edina for an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" liquor license. The required alcohol awareness training has not been completed yet. Pinstripes Inc. is planning on operating a Restaurant at 3849 Gallagher Dr., in Edina. MN. Pinstripes Inc. is incorporated. in the State of Delaware. The Delaware Secretary of State reports they are in good standing. Owners /Managers /Members Pinstripes Inc.: President Dale Robert Schwartz Glenview, If-, The owners/managers/members have been investigated and were found to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Delaware Secretary of State Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Liquor Control. Board Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the infornhation gathered during the course of the investigation, I found. nothing to prevent Pinstripes Inc. from obtaining an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance ofthis license. Sgt. Nate Mendel #117 �. rim. MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item II. C. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk 1p ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing — New Intoxicating License — Mozza Mia •, ®ice Lz%O-W.__Aqu REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item II. C. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing — New Intoxicating License — Mozza Mia ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving New On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Sunday On -Sale Liquor License to Mozza Mia LLC. dba as Mozza Mia, for the period beginning October 5, 2010 and ending March 31, 2011. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Mozza Mia LLC. dba as Mozza Mia at 3910 West 501h Street has applied for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. Edina Code requires a public hearing before the issuance of a new liquor license. The proper notification has been published in the Edina Sun Current. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation and supports the issuance of the requested licenses. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. Attachment: Sgt. Mendel's memorandum W BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMA[ ON -SALE INTOXiCATING LIQUOR OR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE Establishment: MozzaMia, LLC License: On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" On 07/13/10, MozzaMia, LLC. made application to the City of Edina for an On -Sale intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Sales" liquor license. The required alcohol awareness training has not been completed yet. MozzaMia, .i..J.,C is planning; on operating a restaurant at 3910 W. 50 "' St., in Edina, MN. MozzaMia is an Limited Liability Company (LLC) in the State of Minnesota. The Minnesota Secretary of State reports they are in good standing. Owners /Managers/Members MozzaMia LLC: Philip A.rleigh Roberts Edina, MN Kevin Baxter Kuester Peter Jon Mihajlov Barbara Ruth Marshall Russell T. Lund III. Kimberly Anne Lund Shauna Lund McFeeley Robert Thomas Lund Dennis I...ee Monroe Nantucket, MA 'ronka Bay, MN Shoreview, MN Minnetrista; MN Minneapolis, MN Charlotte, NC Minneapolis, MN Edina, MN The owners /managers /members have been investigated. All but one individual were found to have no criminal records. Robert Thomas Lund was found to have a criminal record and is on supervised probation for a DWI offense until 01 /07/13. Checks were made on each individual with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Statewide Supervision System Minnesota Liquor: Control Board Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. BACKGROUND INVCSTIGATION.SUMMARV ,. ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR.OR ON -SALE, WIDE LICENSE Establishment: MozzaMia, LLC License: On -Sale Intoxicating & On.Sale "Special. Sunday Sales" Frorri;tlie infonrnation gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent MozzaMia, LLC from obtaining an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale "Special Sunday Saps'' license: I would support a positive recommendation fron"the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Sgt. Nate Mendel #1.17 of . REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # II. D. 1 -5. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action City Engineer F-1 Discussion Date: October 5, 2010 F-1 Information Subject: Special Assessment Public Hearings: 1. Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. A -213 & L -43 — Resolution No. 2010 -81 2. Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. A -214 & L -49 — Resolution No. 2010 -93 3. Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA- 356 — Resolution No. 2010 -82 4. St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA- 357 — Resolution No. 2010 -83 5. South Garden Estates Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -358 — Resolution No. 2010 -84 Recommendation: Approve assessments as proposed for Improvements A -213, A -214, L -43, L -49, BA -356, BA -357, and BA -358. Info /Background: Attached you will find an Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, and Certificate of Mailing including the Notice of Public Hearing, and other supporting documentation for each proposed assessment. All properties were notified per Minnesota State Statute — Chapter 429 for special assessments. Staff also sent out with each individual notice a "Proposed Assessment Statement" that included a sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based on the entire assessment being certified to the Hennepin County, see attached. In addition to each submittal the following comments are submitted for consideration: 1. & 2. Improvement Nos. A -213 & L -43, and A -214 & L -49 - Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction: This project included a reduction in the special assessment if the resident had their sanitary sewer service rehabilitated from the right -of -way line to the sanitary sewer mainline; approximately 88 percent of the property owners rehabilitated their sanitary sewer services. Approximately 4 to 6 property owners did not have their sanitary sewer service completed to the sewer main — most were about 6 -feet short. Some of these residents have contacted staff or our consultant regarding their service and most have stated that they would contact their contractor or plumber that performed this work. These properties did not see a reduction in the special assessment, due to the City's contractor completing these services. The proposed assessment for Improvement A -213 & L -43, for properties that did not have their sewer service completed, is $16,174.14; compared to the estimate of $18,210.00. The proposed assessment for Improvement A -213 & L -43, for properties that did have their sewer service complete, is $11,468.98; compared to the estimate of $11,810.00. The proposed assessment for Improvement A -214 & L -49, for properties that did not have their sewer service completed, is $20,389.70; compared to the estimate of $22,900.00. The proposed assessment for Improvement A -214 & L -49, for properties that did have their sewer service complete, is $15,370.74; compared to the estimate of $16,900.00. Staff & consultant have also had communications with the property owner of 4506 Arden Avenue regarding three sections of concrete curb and gutter that are cracked and will be replaced under the project warranty in early summer of 2011. One of the three panels is adjacent to a mature Elm tree; staff believes that the roots from this tree are affecting the curb and gutter. The project did have many trees in close proximity to curb and gutters. Therefore, we do expect additional cracking throughout the project. The project did everything possible to protect the trees, including not excavating behind the curb and gutters when they were adjacent to the trees. The project specifications also included penalties to the contractor if they had damaged any trees; no penalties were charged on this project. Staff recommends that these projects, A -213 & L -43, and A -214 & L -49, be voted on separately. As of this writing no other comments have been submitted or called in. 3. Improvement No. BA -356: Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction. Staff has received one comment from a resident approving of the assessment and quality of the project, see attached note. As of this writing no other comments have been submitted or called in. 4. Improvement No. BA -357: St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction. Attached is a letter from a homeowner objecting to the amount of the assessment. As of this writing no comments have been submitted or called in. 5. Improvement No. BA -358: South Garden Estates Neighborhood Reconstruction. A resident that lives at the corner of Dunham Drive and Wooddale Avenue has reported an area where minor amount of debris, leaves and sand, from storm water runoff deposits after rainfall events, see attached. This area was analyzed during the design of the project and a cost effective solution was not found due to the extensive distance that a storm sewer pipe would need to be constructed. Staff has instructed our street department to increase the street sweeping for this location. As of this writing no other comments have been submitted or called in. ATTACHMENTS: • Sample "Proposed Assessment Statement" • Improvements A213, L43, & A214, L49: Final Project Costs Analysis, Final Assessment Roll, Certificate of Mailing, and Notice of Public Hearing. Correspondence regarding 4506 Arden Avenue. • Improvement BA -356: Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, Certificate of Mailing, and Notice of Public Hearing. Note on Proposed Assessment Statement from resident. • Improvement BA -357: Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, Certificate of Mailing, and Notice of Public Hearing. Letter from resident. • Improvement BA -358: Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, Certificate of Mailing, and Notice of Public Hearing. Email from resident. g: \englneering \assessments \2010 assessments \Item II. d. 1 - 5 special assessments.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-81 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC EUPROVEMENTS City of Edina WFIEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. A -213 & L -43 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 20 11. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Edina Country Club Neighborhood Levy No. 17710 10 Reconstruction 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 5t' day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -81 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2010-93 A RESOLUTIONLEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. A -214 & L -49 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF 1MPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Edina Country Club Neighborhood Levy No. 17711 10 Reconstruction 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 5t' day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -93 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 . City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2010-82 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -356 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction Levy No. 17712 10 years 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 5b day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -82 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2010-83 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction —Improvement No. BA -357 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS -St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction Levy No. 17713 10 years 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 5t' day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -83 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20—. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2010-84 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: South Garden Estates Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -358 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the. City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement'in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS South Garden Estates Neighborhood Levy No. 17714 10 Reconstruction 3. The owner of the property so .assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 5t' day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -84 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk A SEH EDINA, MINNESOTA COUNTRY CLUB AREA SEWER, WATER, AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT ENG NO. 08-1 SER NO. AEDINA0503.01 FINAL PROJECT COSTS 2/148008 Rerbd: IM7109 MOW Updaledudna anal Tare) Prom Cam. PVMEGdMWW01VCAU}41AUS>®m 0,*AP�)m Off-RW A® 9 r0l0dr]Aav>mme City Finance Costs �y,y Country Club A -213 5!r —g :$r.1 9 SEH Ews $2,32D,170.61 Ccunby Club A -214 =.. 1 <::, "$+1; g�4 Bi26 CounbyClubL43;}rq` +�•'•(7�($ Country Ciub L49 ''4lu : k Sip 3 4:59. Item Construction Cost % of Total Construction Costs 9 Consulting Fee's City Engineering/ Clerical Costs - Mlsc Expenses per City General Ledger (1) Irrigation /Pet Fence Repairs Final Project Cost w10 City Financing Costa During Construction City Financing Costs During Construction Final Project Cost Estimated Total Project Cost from 11128107 Feasibility Study Difference (4) Storm Sewer STS -297 $1,242,709.5 9.60% $222,621.41 Total Project Cost Assessment Assessment Rate $1,465,330.91 Difference (5) $1,465,330.91 $1,188,000.0 $2T7,330.91 Sanitary Sewer SS413 1 9114 031.31 14.70% $341,091.90 $2,245,123.21 $Z245,123.21 $2,670,000.00 -$424,876.79 Water Main WM436 $3,815.072.05. 29.46% $683,439.48 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and $4.498.511.53 39 $4,498,511.53 $5,208.000.00 • 707 488.47 Lighting L43 A-213 $299,664.0 2.31 % $53 682.41 $353,346.4 OWN ''. '12 ;1:' ;87n $370 491.14 $458,000.00 -$87,508.8 U htin L49 A -214 $356415.47 2.75% $63,848.98 ;10.324.291 9 670 654 $420,264.43 ,'- a "�1ua? �rP039�Ii5$; $440,650.02 $587 000.00 -$126,343.9 A-213 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk PI a and the RI htoRWa Una $154,064.00 1.18% $27,599.33 $181,663.33 33 $183,500.86 $2,065,000.0 0 , 499.14 A -213 Streets S Sidewalks $2,635,041. 20.35% $472,046.51 $4,452.26 $15,240.2 $62,144.0 $3,188,924 $3,341,561.08 $2,555,000.00 $780,561.0 A -214 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe end the Rightof- -Way Une $105,414.38 0.81 % $18,884.13 $124,296.48 '�:�c$a In $125,474.09 $1,378,000.00 $1,252,525.81 A-214 Streets 8 Sidewalks 2 439163.24 18.83% $438 958.48 344.23 14 409.20 $87 19.02 2 982 092.17 �ah:>:h',vu 4325 $3.125,354.84i 834 000.00 1 354.84 Total $12,951,575.58 $2,320,170.61 $16,459,555.19 18 721,000.00 $11:1211,1.!551 -$1,124,996.331 Estimated Assessments per REU Assessment Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and the Rightof- -Way Una $125,474.09 25 $5,018.96 REU's per Final Rate Reported $440,656.02 232 Assessment District Total Project Cost Assessment Assessment Rate by 11/26/07 Difference (5) $13,471.36 13 635 84 District per REU Feasibility Study (3) A -213 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and $183,500.86 39 $4,705.15 $6,400 41,695 the Rlghtof -Way Line SueetU h0n $370491.14 323.66 $1144.69 2140 -$995 Streats/SIdewalk9 3341 581.08 323.66 ;10.324.291 9 670 654 Total $J,595,553.u1 $15,174.14 $1tl,210.uu - $2,o35.95 A -214 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and the Rightof- -Way Una $125,474.09 25 $5,018.96 $6,000 4981 Street Lighting $440,656.02 232 $1,899.38 $3,365 1466 StreetslSldewalks $3,125,354.84 232 $13,471.36 13 635 84 Total $3,691,4114.95 $20,389.70 $22,90D.00 $2,510.30 Nd": (1) Mbsc aapemee Indude emmn Inbew nmb3d0l bngng. caft —bid doalmems and malifts, pwlage ror neighborhood coatings, elo. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A•213, L43 Page 1 of 7 Estimated Total Taypayers Mailing Assessment Rate PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sldewalks per Lot 1802824120170 BARBARA & JAY ROTHMEIER 4500 ARDEN AVE 4500 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824120169 WILLIAM HOCH JR 4501 ARDEN AVE 4501 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $18174.13 1802824120030 LISA FITTIPALDI 4502 ARDEN AVE 4502 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 10 324.29 11 468.98 1802824120015 CAROL & EDWARD HANCOCK 4503 ARDEN AVE 4503 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $10,324.291 $11.46B.98 1802824120031 JOSEPH W LICHTENBERGER 4504 ARDEN AVE 4504 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120016 TIMOTHY & MICHELL PRONLEY 4505 ]ARDEN ARDEN AVE 4505 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120032 JOYCELYN ANVY MELLOM 4506 ARDEN AVE 4506 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120017 MATTHEW E ABROE 4507 ARDEN AVE 4507 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120033 MARJORIE WUNDER 4508 ARDEN AVE 4508 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120018 ELIZABETH S & ALEC C SHEROD 4509 AVE 4509 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120034 BRADLEY & PATRICIA BURLEY 4510 1ARDEN AVE 4510 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 ­MN $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120019 MARGARET & JAMES MANNIX 4511 ARDEN AVE 4511 ARDEN AVE EDINA $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120035 VIRGIL & PATRICIA LEIH 4512 ARDEN AVE 4512 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1.144.69. $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120020 DAVID BEADIE 4513 ARDEN AVE 4513 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 1.144.691 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120036 VIRGINIA & JEFFERY SWEITZER 4514 ARDEN AVE 4514 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120021 TIMOTHY J PRONLEY 4515 ARDEN AVE 4515 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1,144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120037 MICHAEL FAY 4516 ARDEN AVE 4516 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 .$4,705.15 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $16 174.13 1802824120022 STEVEN LUNDBERG 4517 ARDEN AVE 4517 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4 705.15 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $16174.13 1802824120038 THOMAS D MCFERSON 4518 ARDEN AVE 4518 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120023 KEVIN & JACQUELINE BIDGOOD 4519 ARDEN AVE 4519 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324. 29 $11,468.98 1802824120039 LINDA A KRAFT & ANTHONY J JOHANNES 4520 ARDEN AVE 4520 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120024 REGINA M. PLATT 4521 ARDEN AVE 4521 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120040 FRANK CERRA 4522 — DEN AVE 4522 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120025 MITCHELL T MCMILLEN 4523 ARDEN AVE 4523 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120041 MARION & ROGER ANDERSON 4524 ARDEN AVE 4524 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120026 JEANETTE WIDELL 4525 IARDEN AVE 4525 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120042 PAUL & DIANA BEARMON 4526 ARDEN AVE 4526 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120027 JEAN CAIZZO 4527 ARDEN AVE 4527 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.981 1802824120043 ANN & RICHARD MEYER 4528 ARDEN AVE 4528 ARDEN AVE. EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120028 MARY & MARK RURIK 4529 ARDEN AVE 4529 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.981 1802824120044 MICHELLE & JON B PAULEY 4530 ARDEN AVE 4530 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,488.98 1802824120029 KERMIT FRUECHTE 4531 ARDEN AVE 4531 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 8 $10,324.29 $11468.98 1802824120153 GREGORY M ALLERS & CONNIE L MEYER 4600 ARDEN AVE P.O. BOX 24029 EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11468.98 1802824120172 ANDREA & BENJAMIN KNOLL 4601 ARDEN AVE 4601 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11468.98 1802824120154 MARJORIE K SOPER & CRAIG R WEINERT 4602 ARDEN AVE 4602 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11468.98 1802824120173 BRETT D CASEBOLT 4603 ARDEN AVE 4603 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11468.98 1802824120155 MARK A GUNTER 4604 ARDEN AVE 4604 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120174 JOHN & KATHRYN BOYER 4605 ARDEN AVE 4605 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468. 1802824120156 EDWARD WHITE 4606 ARDEN AVE 4606 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120161 TODD & CAROL DOOLEY 4607 ARDEN AVE 4607 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130073 MARK & STEPHANIE SCHOENING 4608 ARDEN AVE 4608 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130102 TODD & JAYNE BURKE TUTTLE 4609 ARDEN AVE 4609 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130074 PAUL & ANNE SCOGGIN 4610 ARDEN AVE 4610 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130103 SANDRA & PETER COCHRANE 4611 ARDEN AVE 4611 ARDEN AVE JEDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130075 JEREMY MANIAK 4612 ARDEN AVE 4612 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.68 $10 324.29 $11468.98 1802824130076 JENNIFER KLISE & DACK RAGUS 4614 ARDEN AVE 4614 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10 324.28 11 468.98 1802824130104 KEVIN & SARA HACKLER 4615 ARDEN AVE 14615 ARDEN AVE IEDINA MN 55424 1 $1,144.691 $10,324.291 $11,468.98 1802824130077 ILORI LYNN NISSEN 4616 ARDEN AVE 14616 ARDEN AVE IEDINA MN 55424 1 $1.144.691 $10,324.291 $11-488,981 Page 1 of 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A•213, L-43 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824130105 GREGORY & JILLIAN BROWN 4617 ARDEN AVE 4617 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130078 DAVID & JOAN BOWLIN 4618 ARDEN AVE 4618 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,466.98 1802624130106 BLAIR CARLSON 4619 ARDEN AVE 4619 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130079 JASON S & DEBORAH S DOESCHER 4620 ARDEN AVE 4620 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130107 ROBERT & JOAN BONELLO 4621 ARDEN AVE 4621 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130080 LORI & RICHARD JOBIN 4622 ARDEN AVE 4622 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824130108 GINA & CHARLES TRIERWEILER 4623 ARDEN AVE 808 BOULDER LAKE C VESTAVIA HILLS AL 35242 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130081 ROBERT & ANNE GASKILL 4624 ARDEN AVE 4624 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130109 GARY HAUCK 4625 ARDEN AVE P.O. BOX 24131 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55424 $1,144.69. $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130082 JOHN MOYNIHAN JR 4626 ARDEN AVE 4626 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130110 MARGARET & MARK JESSEN 4627 1ARDEN AVE 4627 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824130083 MARK & JEAN LARSON 4628 ARDEN AVE 4628 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130111 REBECCA & DAVID LINDBERG 4629 ARDEN AVE 4629 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10.3 24.29 $16,174.13 1802824130084 HEATHER FERNANDEZ 4630 ARDEN AVE 4630 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130112 CHRISTIN & RANDAL HARRISON 4631 ARDEN AVE 4631 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130085 DONNA & PAUL WIESE ARBISI 4632 ARDEN AVE 4632 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130113 WILLIAM BERG 4633 ARDEN AVE 4633 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11,468. 98 1802824130114 1JOAN SWENDSEEN 4637 ARDEN AVE 4637 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130124 WILLIAM LOUGH II & BARBARA PANAIRE 4900 IARDEN AVE 4900 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130115 CATHERINE & STEVEN WEBSTER 4901 ARDEN AVE 4901 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130116 THOMAS J BECKEY & PATRICIA KRAEMER 4903 ARDEN AVE 4903 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130125 GERALD SORENSEN 4904 ARDEN AVE 4904 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130117 HUGH JONES 4905 ARDEN AVE 4905 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130126 BENJAMIN & JUDITH RANDALL 4906 ARDEN AVE 4906 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98. 1602824130118 SCOTT DILLON & KATHARINE DANZANSKY 4907 ARDEN AVE 4907 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130127 JAMES KAKALIOS 4908 ARDEN AVE 4908 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130119 MARGARET GOETZE 4909 ARDEN AVE 4909 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130128 STEPHANIE ALLISON & DAVID LILAK 4910 ARDEN AVE 4910 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130120 GARY & KATHRYN BROTHERS 4911 ARDEN AVE 4911 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69. $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130129 SUSAN JO GOLDSTEIN 4912 ARDEN AVE 4912 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130130 TODD OLSON 4914 ARDEN AVE 4914 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69. $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130121 JAMES SORBORO & KARLA GLUEK 4915 ARDEN AVE 4915 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1,144.691 $10,324.29 $11.468.98. 1802824130131 ROBERT ALTMAN -SEGAL 4916 ARDEN AVE 4916 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1,144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.981 1802824130122 CLINTON SCHROEDER 4917 ARDEN AVE 4917 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130123 AMY & MICHAEL KOLAR 4919 ARDEN AVE 4919 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130132 THOMAS RODDIS 4920 ARDEN AVE 4920 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120171 GERALD MARTIN 4501 BRUCE AVE 4501 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120061 LEON DE WIT 4502 BRUCE AVE 4502 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.L9 $11,468.98 1802824120059 DENISE & JUSTIN COLE 4503 BRUCE AVE 4503 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120062 PAUL S & KRISTEN F VIETZEN 4504 BRUCE AVE 4504 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.9. 1802824120058 LAWRENCE & ROSEANNE CHENG 4505 BRUCE AVE 4505 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468. 8 1802824120063 RICHARD MASSOPUST JR 4506 BRUCE AVE 4506 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120057 DIANE & JOHN WELLS 4507 BRUCE AVE 4507 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120064 ROBERT HILL 4508 BRUCE AVE 4508 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120056 DAVID & MARY GOLDSTEIN 4509 BRUCE AVE 4509 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120065 SEAN KEARNEY 4510 BRUCE AVE 4510 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120055 JENNIFER & ANDREW J MATYSIK 4511 BRUCE AVE 4511 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $1146898 1802824120066 ITIMOTHY O'BRIEN 1 4512 BRUCE AVE 14612 BRUCE AVE JEDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.291 $11,468.98_ FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A- 213, 443 Page 3 of 7 Estimated Total Taypayers Mailing Assessment Rate PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks per Lot 1802824120054 LEONARDO & ERIN RAPALLINI 4513 BRUCE AVE 4513 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120067 MATTHEW & JULIE WALTER 4514 BRUCE AVE 4514 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120053 ROBERT BROWN 4515 IBRUCEAVE 4515 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120068 JOHN & KATHERINE PLUHAR 4516 IBRUCE AVE 4516 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120052 TIMOTHY B JENSEN 4517 BRUCE AVE 4517 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 8 1802824120069 RICHARD GUSTAFSON 4518 BRUCE AVE 4518 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324. $11,468.98 1802824120051 LINDA SMITH 4519 BRUCE AVE 4519 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120070 WILLIAM WHITESITT III 4520 BRUCE AVE 4520 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120050 STUART & ANDREA TURNER 4521 BRUCE AVE 4521 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120071 ERIK J WORDELMAN 4522 BRUCE AVE 4522 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120049 IROBERT & CAROL THOMPSON 4523 BRUCE AVE 4523 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 8 1602824120072 JEFFREY & LORIE ERICSON 4524 BRUCE AVE 4524 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4 705.15 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $16 174.13 1802824120048 BARBARA VLAMING 4525 BRUCE AVE 4525 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120175 BRUCE & CAROLYN LESLIE 4526 BRUCE AVE 4526 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120047 TODD WATCHMAKER 4527 BRUCE AVE 4527 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120176 SCOTT & KIRSTEN REWEY 4528 BRUCE AVE 4528 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120046 ANNE & PERRY HUNTER 4529 BRUCE AVE 4529 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120074 THOMAS DILLON 4530 BRUCE AVE 4530 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120045 DAVID HOVEN 4531 BRUCE AVE 4531 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424. $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120145 BRADLEY SCHAEPPI 4600 BRUCE AVE 4600 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4 ,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $18174.13 1802824120160 CAROL & FREDRICKARNASON 4601 BRUCE AVE 4601 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120146 REFINED LLC 4602 BRUCE AVE 4010 GRIMES AVE SO EDINA MN 55416 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120159 GORDON SPARTZ 4603 BRUCE AVE 4603 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120147 VICTORIA SLOMIANY 4604 BRUCE AVE 4604 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120158 JENNIFER & SEAN FAETH 4605 BRUCE AVE 4605 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120148 WILLIAM & SARA MIZE 4606 BRUCE AVE 4606 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120157 MICHELLE & DANIEL KRAFT 4607 BRUCE AVE 4607 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130044 IRINA & BRUCE LINDER 4608 BRUCE AVE 4608 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130098 CHERYL HIRATA - DULAS & DANIEL DULAS 4609 BRUCE AVE 4609 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130045 WILLIAM JADKOWSKI & KATHLEEN O'DEA 4610 IBRUCEAVE 4610 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 66424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130097 MICHAEL J HARTMANN 4611 BRUCE AVE 4611 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69. $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824130046 JOEL & EMMA HUTCHESON 4612 BRUCE AVE 4612 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10.324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130096 ARDELLE SCHULTZ 4613 BRUCE AVE 4613 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130047 LUIS DECUBAS 4614 BRUCE AVE 4614 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130095 JOANNE FARLEY 4615 BRUCE AVE 4615 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130048 EMILY B & DAVID T JOHNSON 4616 BRUCE AVE 4616 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130094 SUSAN MAKEPEACE & THOMAS BASTING JR 4617 BRUCE AVE 4617 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824130049 MATTHEW & KRISTIN PIERRE 4618 BRUCE AVE 4618 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130093 RALPH TULLY 4619 BRUCE AVE 4619 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144. 9 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130050 KEITH DOWNEY & AMY HENDRIKSE 4620 BRUCE AVE 4620 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130092 MADELINE CUSHMAN 4621 BRUCE AVE 4621 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130051 KATHLEEN & PAUL RUNICE 4622 BRUCE AVE 4622 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130091 LI LISA GE 4623 BRUCE AVE 4623 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130052 JAMES & RUTH MELCHER 4624 BRUCEAVE 4624 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130090 ELIZABETH & JOHN BALAY 4625 BRUCE AVE 4625 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130053 HEATHER R & BRETT R FENSKE 4626 BRUCE AVE 4626 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.6921 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824130089 MATTHEW R & GENEVIEVE DESMOND 4627 BRUCE AVE 4627 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.6$10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824130054 TRACIE &JOHN ROSSMAN 4628 BRUCE AVE 4828 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $10.32 $11 468.98 Page 3 of 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A•213, L-43 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taxpayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824130088 DAVID & HEATHER MELLOH 4629 BRUCE AVE 4629 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824130055 PATRICK J & KATHERINE W WELLNER 4630 BRUCE AVE 4630 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130087 TRUDI ANDERSON & JOSEPH GREEN 4631 BRUCE AVE 4631 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 10 324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130056 JACQUELINE A & BRIAN FOGELBERG 4632 BRUCE AVE 4632 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130086 BARBARA & PAUL LAEDERACH 4633 BRUCE AVE 4633 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130057 EDITH BURNIER & THOMAS RAEUCHLE 4634 BRUCE AVE 4634 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130147 JO ELLEN SAYLOR 4900 BRUCE AVE 4900 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130139 JOHN BENSON 4901 BRUCE AVE 4901 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130146 NORRIS THOMPSON & MICHELE FRIEDMANN 4902 BRUCE AVE 4902 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130138 PAULA & JOHN SWEET 4903 BRUCE AVE 4903 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824130145 KENNETH & MARY KAY HERUTH 4904 BRUCE AVE 4904 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10 324.28 $11,468.98 1802824130144 RENEE MAY & RICHARD MAY JR 4908 BRUCE AVE 4906 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16.174.13 1802824130137 JILL & DANIEL MCCARTY 4907 BRUCE AVE 4907 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.1 1802824130143 THOMAS HOGAN 4908 BRUCE AVE 4908 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130136 MATTHEW & JANNA HOMAN 4909 BRUCE AVE 4909 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824130163 JONATHON HORNIG 4910 BRUCE AVE 4910 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130135 RICHARD B HADDAD 4911 BRUCE AVE 4911 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11 468.98 1802824130134 TIMOTHY F & STEPHANIE RYAN 4913 IBRUCEAVE 4913 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130140 LINDA MCGOWAN & ROBERT FRIED 4914 BRUCE AVE 4914 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16.174.13 1802824130133 LORI & RUSSEL ANDERSON 4919 BRUCEAVE 4919 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69. $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120091 SIDNEY SAMPSON 4500 CASCO AVE 4500 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120090 CHARLES & RAQUEL LAYTON 4501 CASCO AVE 4501 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1602824120089 STEPHEN MARKER 4503 CASCO AVE 4503 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824120092 JOSEPH J SULLIVAN 4504 CASCO AVE 4504 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11,468. 8 1802824120088 RICHARD ALLYN & MARGARET BROWNELL 4505 CASCO AVE 4505 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120093 ROBERT PATRIN 4506 CASCO AVE 4506 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824120087 LOUIS & MARTA KALUZA 4507 CASCO AVE 4507 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120094 ROBIN REICHEL SMITH 4508 CASCO AVE 4508 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120086 TIMOTHY & LISA ZELLMER 4509 CASCO AVE 4509 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824120095 COLLIN & SUSAN BRINKMAN 4510 CASCO AVE 4510 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824120085 BRADLEY & TAMARA JOHNSON 4511 CASCO AVE 4511 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98. 1802824120096 DANIEL & CATHERINE HOLLERMAN 4512 CASCO AVE 4512 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120084 DIANE & JOHN AKIBA JR 4513 CASCO AVE 4513 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120097 STEPHEN NELSON 4514 CASCO AVE 4514 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120083 MELISSA RAPHAN & THOMAS ROCK 4515 CASCO AVE 4515 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120098 VIRGINIA & GEORGE JOHNSTON 4516 CASCO AVE 4516 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120082 SUSAN & MICHAEL LEWIS 4517 CASCO AVE 4517 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824120099 J DUDLEY & R R JONES 4518 CASCO AVE 4518 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120081 SUSAN & THOMAS WILSON 4519 CASCO AVE 4519 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120100 TIMOTHY & MARY SHANNAHAN 4520 CASCO AVE 4520 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.1 1802824120080 BRETT HEFFES 4521 CASCO AVE 4521 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69. $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120101 KRISTA & J WESLEY RATLIFF CASCO AVE 4522 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120079 BRENDA & DONALE MCCORMICK III CASCO AVE 4523 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120102 ROBERT & PATRICIA SYKES CASCO AVE 4524 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120078 LEO & MARILYN PERTL M4526 CASCO AVE 4525 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120103 JEFFREY W DEWING CASCO AVE 4526 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1 144.69 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120077 MARK R PLATT CASCO AVE P.O. BOX 390 VICTORIA MN 55386 $4 705.15 1 144.69 10 324.29 $16 174.13 1802824120104 SCOTT M TAYLOR & ANNE M H HUNTER CASCO AVE 14528 CASCO AVE JEDINA MN 55424 1 $1.144.691 $10,324.291 $11 468.98 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -213, L-43 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824120076 1802824120105 JAMES & AMY VOSE STEVEN & CATHERINE CARLSON 4529 4530 CASCO AVE CASCO AVE 4529 CASCO AVE 4530 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 $11,468.98 1802824120075 JOHN & CARLA TEMPLE 4531 CASCO AVE 4531 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120106 1802824120138 LESLIE A KREOFSKY LUANN & THOMAS ZUMWALDE 4532 4600 CASCO AVE CASCO AVE 4532 CASCO AVE 4600 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $1,144.69. $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 $11,468.9 1802824120152 TROY & MICHELLE EIGNER 4601 CASCO AVE 4601 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120139 ROBB GUTOWSKY 4602 CASCO AVE 4602 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1602824120151 DAVID ANDERSON 4603 CASCO AVE 4603 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120140 DEWAYNE PETERSEN 4604 CASCO AVE 4604 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120150 DEAN BACHMEIER & CAROL GREENLAND 4605 CASCO AVE 4605 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120141 JAMES & LISA KORSLUND Go MOLITOR & ASSOCIATES 4606 CASCO AVE 4530 WEST 77TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120149 AMY & DAVID BATTEL 4607 ICASCO AVE 4607 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130015 CHRISTINE & RICHARD PASSOLT JR 4608 CASCO AVE 4608 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130072 HEIDI BRIGGS 4609 CASCO AVE 4609 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130016 CAROL KAST & STUART ADLER II 4610 CASCO AVE 4610 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130071 KATHRYN & ERIC THOMSON 4611 CASCO AVE 4611 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130017 CYNTHIA & DAVID FARMER 4612 CASCO AVE 4612 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130070 PHYLLIS CARTER 4613 CASCO AVE 4613 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130018 TIMOTHY HENDRICKS 4614 CASCO AVE 4614 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824130069 PATRICK WETHINGTON 4615 ICASCO AVE 4615 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130019 DAWN & DAVID BUCHANAN 4616 CASCO AVE 4616 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824130068 JAMES & JULIE WOHLFORD 4617 CASCO AVE 4617 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130020 ONAN THOMPSON 4618 CASCO AVE 4618 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130067 SUSAN & MARK CHRISTENSEN 4619 CASCO AVE 4619 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16174.13 1802824130021 GAIL SIMONS 4620 CASCO AVE 4620 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130066 LAWRENCE POBUDA 4621 CASCO AVE 4621 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130022 JEFFREY & WENDY WOJNICZ 4622 CASCO AVE 4622 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130065 JEFFREY GISSELBECK 4623 CASCO AVE 4623 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130023 PATRICK & GWEN GARRISON 4624 CASCO AVE 4624 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802624130064 BRIAN WARPINSKI 4625 CASCO AVE 4625 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130024 MARK & ELIZABETH A ENGEL 4626 CASCO AVE 4626 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130063 BARBARA BRAUER 4627 CASCO AVE 4627 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130025 ELIZABETH & TODD SHUMAN 4628 CASCO AVE 4628 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1602824130062 JUDITH L EARLING 4629 CASCO AVE 4629 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130026 PETER & SUZANNE MAGNUSON 4630 CASCO AVE 4630 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130061 MARY WILLIAMS GREIG 4631 CASCO AVE 4631 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10.324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130027 KIMBERLY & ROBERT BOISVERT JR 4632 ICASCO AVE 4632 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824130060 KATHRYN & BRADLEY NELSON 4633 CASCO AVE 4633 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130028 NORTHERN HOLDINGS VI LLC 4634 CASCO AVE 4634 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824130059 ELIZABETH CAMERON 4635 CASCO AVE 4635 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130029 TRUDIE R & MARK D SPRENKLE 4636 CASCO AVE 4636 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130058 RONALD SHARP 4637 CASCO AVE 4637 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130030 RICHARD & SUSAN JOHNSTON 4638 CASCO AVE 4638 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69, $10.324.29, $11.468.98 1802824130148 RICHARD M DORN 4203 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4203 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 $10 324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130165 PATRICIA & PAUL CURRAN 4207 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4207 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 10 324.29 $11 488.98 1802824130166 SUSAN & SCOT HOUSH 4209 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4209 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 IML $10 324.29 $11 488.98 1802824130151 CATHERINE & TIMOTHY HAYDEN 4215 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4215 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 $10 324.29 11 488.98 Page 5 of 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A-213, L,43 PID Taxpayers Name Street fl Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824130152 BROOKE W ALLOCCO 4221 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4221 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130153 ALEXANDER BAINBRIDGE 4225 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4225 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130154 PATRICIA CARLSON 4229 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4229 COUNTRY CLUB EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10 324.29 $11.468.98 1802824120121 MARGARET & JEFFREY HALL 4500 DREXELAVE 4500 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 8 1802824120120 RALPH & JAN HERDA 4501 DREXELAVE 4501 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120122 WILLIAM J MATSCH III 4502 DREXEL AVE 4502 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120119 1802824120123 1802824120118 DAVID WAHOFF SARA L BONELLO JOHN HART 4503 4504 4505 DREXEL AVE DREXEL AVE DREXELAVE 4503 DREXEL AVE 4504 DREXEL AVE 4505 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $1,144.69 $1144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $10324.29 $11,468.98 $11,468.98 $11,468.98 1802824120124 MATTHEW GRIMES 4506 DREXELAVE 4506 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.981 1802824120117 SAMUEL & STACY RITER 4507 DREXELAVE 4507 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120125 CHARLES WASHAM III 4508 DREXELAVE 4508 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120116 KEITH A& CARRIE A WHITE 4509 DREXELAVE 4509 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120126 JANE & JOHN LONNQUIST 4510 DREXELAVE 4510 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120115 KATHRYN & TERRY SANDVEN 4511 DREXELAVE 4511 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1 144.69 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120127 GERALD D SZYKULSKI 4512 DREXELAVE 4512 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1 144.69 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120114 THOMAS & CATHERINE HALL 4513 DREXELAVE 4513 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120128 1802824120113 DOUGLAS & LISA GERVAIS. MICHAEL BLECK & LAURIE ZENNER 4514 4515 DREXELAVE DREXEL AVE 4514 DREXEL AVE 4515 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.89 $1,144.69 $10 324.29 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 $11 468.88 1802824120129 1802824120112 ROBERT WEBB ERIC ABOUSSOUAN 4516 4517 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4516 DREXEL AVE 4517 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11.468.98. $11.468.981 1802824120130 1802824120111 ABBIE & C SCOTT THISS KIMBERLY PRICE 4518 4519 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4518 DREXEL AVE 4519 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,`144.69 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11.468.981 $11,468.98 1802824120131 TIMOTH D BERGESON 4520 DREXEL AVE 4520 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1.144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120110 1802824120132 PAUL M HYDE PETER SENG & STACY ENXING SENG 4521 4522 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4610 CASCADE LA 4522 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 $11,468.98 1802824120109 JOHN KINGSLEY -HEFTY 4523 DREXELAVE 4523 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 705.15 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824120133 1802824120108 MICHELLE L & BRIAN W OLSON BEVERLY ROSENBERG 4524 4525 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4524 DREXEL AVE 4525 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $4 705.15 $1,144.69 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 $18174.13 1802824120134 1802824120107 1802824120135 DOUGLAS & SHARON PUGH M C MILLER & T A THELEN MICHAEL O- ROURKE 4526 4527 4600 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4526 DREXEL AVE 4527 DREXEL AVE 4600 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $1,144.69 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $10, 324.29 $11.468.98 $11,468.9 $11,468.9 1802824120144 CHRISTOPHER & CHRISTEEN PAULISON 4601 DREXEL AVE 4601 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69. $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120136 MARCIA A MCCORMICK HERMAN 4602 DREXELAVE 4602 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120143 THOMAS ANDERSON 4603 DREXEL AVE 4603 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120137 MARIE & EDWARD JACKSON 4604 DREXELAVE 4604 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120142 KEVIN TAUER 4605 DREXEL AVE 4605 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130002 1802824130043 DONALD GEESAMAN DWIGHT SOUCY 4606 4607 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4606 DREXEL AVE 4607 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 $11,468.9 1602824130003 1802824130042 DIANE & CHARLES MASSIE THE MARY SUE SIMON QPRT 4608 4609 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 4608 DREXEL AVE 1495 INNSBRUCK DR EDINA MN 55424 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55432 $4,705.15 $1,144.69 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 $11,468.98 1802824130004 PEGGY & JOHN STEPHENS 4610 DREXEL AVE 4610 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802624130041 STEPHEN & CHERYL BEISANG 4811 DREXEL AVE 4611 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $4,705.15 $1 144.69 $10,324.29 $16,174.13 1802824130005 1802824130040 1802824130006 1802824130039 1802824130007 KEITH T JUNGELS GREGORY & JISELLE GRAVES THEODORE CHRISTIANSON MATTHEW J BERTRAM IRICHARD, STROMME 4612 4613 4614 4615 4616 DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 14 DREXEL AVE DREXELAVE DREXELAVE 14616 4612 DREXEL AVE 613 DREXEL AVE 4614 DREXEL AVE 4615 DREXEL AVE DREXEL AVE JEDINA EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 MN 55424 1,144.691 $1,144.691 $1,144.69 $1,144.691 $1,144.691 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $10,324.29 $10.324.29 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 $11.468.981 $11,468.98 $11,468.98 $11,468.981 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -213, L -43 Page 7 of 7 Taypayers Malting . Estimated Total PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824130038 KAREN & NICHOLAS ROGERS 4617 DREXEL AVE 4617 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130008 JULIE GILLETTE & THOMAS NP JOHNS JR 4618 DREXEL AVE 4618 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 1802824130037 KARL & HEATHER DEXHEIMER 4619 DREXEL AVE 4619 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69. $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130009 GLENCOE PROPERTIES LLC 4620 DREXEL AVE 5829 E JEAN AVENUE PHOENIX AZ 85018 $4,705.1 $1.144.69 $10.32429 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130036 DONALD & SHARON FLEISCHMANN 4621 DREXEL AVE 4621 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $16.174.13 1802824130010 JOHN & CATHERINE COTE WOLF 4622 DREXEL AVE 4622 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $11.468.98 $11 468.88 1802824130035 WILLIAM RICHARDS 4623 DREXEL AVE 4623 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98 1802824130011 DANIEL DELIANEDIS 4624 DREXEL AVE 4624 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10 324.29 11 468.98 1802824130034 SCOTT BOWLBY 4625 DREXELAVE 4625DREXELAVE EDINA MN 55424 $1144.69 $10324.29 $11468.98 1802824130012 JAMES JACKSON 4626 DREXEL AVE 4626 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324. 28 $11,468.98 1802824130033 CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN 4627 DREXEL AVE 4627 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 10 324.29 $11,468.9 1602824130032 PATRICK & SAMANTHA CONLIN 4629 1DREXELAVE 4629 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 11 468.98 1802824130014 BRIGHT DORNBLASER 4630 DREXELAVE 4630 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1144.69 $10324.28 $11468.98 1802824130031 KATHRYN HAYMAKER 4633 1DREXELAVE 4633 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824130156 NILOOFAR & FARZAD FARHANGNIA 2 EDINA CT 2 EDINA CT EDINA MN 55424 $377.75 $3 407.01 $3 784.76 1802824130157 ADAM & ANGELA AILLONI 3 EDINA CT 3 EDINA CT EDINA MN 55424 $377.75 $3 407.01 3 784.76 1802824120168 D C WORKMAN & W M LEHMAN 4100 SUNNYSIDE RD 4100 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324. 1802824120187 JOHN NEALON 4102 SUNNYSIDE RD 4102 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10.324.29 11 468.98 $11,468.98 1802824120166 MICHAEL & DIANE FEWER 4104 SUNNYSIDE RD 4104 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120165 STEVEN L & MARGARET M POLACEK 4106 SUNNYSIDE RD 4106 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 1802824120164 MARY & RONALD LAMBERTON 4108 SUNNYSIDE RD 4108 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 $11.468.98 1802824120163 LAURA & DAVID YONCE 4110 SUNNYSIDE RD 4110 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $lt468.9 8 1802824120162 CHERYLE & ANDREW ATKIN 4112 SUNNYSIDE RD 4112 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.98. 1802824120001 BRAD BEGLEY 4114 SUNNYSIDE RD 4114 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.981 1802824120060 ANDREW C SELDEN 4115 SUNNYSIDE RD 4115 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11.468.981 1802824120002 KIM M SCHMID 4116 SUNNYSIDE RD 4116 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10 324.29 $11 488.98 1802824120003 BARBARA & JAMES EPPEL JR 4118 SUNNYSIDE RD 4118 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324.29 $11 468.88 1802824120004 PETER BITTERMAN & CYNTHIA GROSS 4120 SUNNYSIDE RD 4120 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.25 $11,468.9 1802824120005 GREGORY ENGEN 4200 SUNNYSIDE RD 4200 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $4 705.15 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $18174.13 1802824120006 JON CARLSON & KARLENE BECK 4202 SUNNYSIDE RD 6260 REGINA LA BEAUMONT TX 77706 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120007 SARAH TRUESDELL & DAVID ETZWILER 4204 ISUNNYSIDE RD 4204 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10,324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120008 MARY BETH & DAVID ANDERSON 4206 SUNNYSIDE RD 4206 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1 144.69 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1802824120009 DAVID THOMPSON 4208 SUNNYSIDE RD 4208 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.691 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120010 MARGARET & JEFFREY KEYES 4210 SUNNYSIDE RD 4210 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.144.69 $10 324.29 $11 468.98 1602824120011 NORMAN &BERTHA BLEMASTER 4212 SUNNYSIDE RD 4212 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.6 $10,324. $11,468.98 1802824120012 RONNIE ERHARDT 4214 SUNNYSIDE RD 4214 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.9 1802824120013 DAVID DAHL & EILEEN O'SHAUGHNESSY 4216 SUNNYSIDE RD 4216 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 1802824120014 JOANNE & WILLIAM PATTERSON 4218 SUNNYSIDE RD 142118 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,144.69 $10,324.29 $11,468.98 TOTALS 1 $183,500.85 $376,490.37 $3 341,559.69 $3,895,550.91 Page 7 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 13, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction, Improvement .Nos. A -213 & L-43 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 13th day of September, 2010. Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Edina Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 5, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider and possibly adopt a proposed special assessment and to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to the proposed special assessment for the following improvement: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A -213: EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION The area proposed to be assessed for the project is the Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $3,895,550.91. PROPOSED. ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Sanitary Sewer Line: $ Street Lighting: $ Streets & Sidewalk: $ Total Assessment: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT OPTIONS The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years at the rate of 5.75 %. Following the assessment hearing, and City Council formal adoption of the assessment roll, you may pay the assessment as follow: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. 2. Pay a minimum of 25% of the assessment by November 30, 2010 (authorized by ordinance). Your remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 3. If not paid by November 30, 2010, the assessment will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 4. Deferral on homesteads owned by persons 65 years of ager or older: Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make- the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 MAKING YOUR PAYMENT . 1. Make your check payable to the City of Edina and return by mail to the City of Edina, Assessing Department, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, with your statement; or 2. Make payment in person in the Assessing Department, City Hall, 4801 W. 501h Street. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA.CITY COUNCIL September 13, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk %- O H City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0365 fi' 1.' f �'•'�. trl r'r. ..•.+'d:'„ :,. rJ.:•:.�i.: j':',r1F;o,1rr+/;ss�, k THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL — PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: TAXPAYER (S): YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 5, 2010 Total Assessment: $11,468.98 Interest Rate: 5.75% Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Remaining Principal 2010 $ 174.25 1 2011 $ 1,181.37 $ 697.01 $ 2,052.63 $ 10,632.31 2 2012 $ 1,181.37 $ 627.31 $ 1,808.67 $ 9,450.94 3 2013 $ 1,181.37 $ 557.61 $ 1,738.97 $ 8,269.58 4 2014 $ 1,181.37 $ 487.90 $ 1,669.27 $ 7,088.21 5 2015 $ 1,181.37 $ 418.20 $ 1,599.57 $ 5,906.84 6 2016 $ 1,181.37 $ 348.50 $ 1,529.87 $ 4,725.47 7 2017 $ 1,181.37 $ 278.80 $ 1,460.17 $ 3,544.10• 8 2018 $ 1,181.37 $ 209.10 $ 1,390.47 $ 2,362.74 9 2019 $ 1,181.37 $ 139.40 $ 1,320.77 $ 1,181.37 10 2020 $ 1,181.37 $ 69.70 $ 1,251.07 $ (0.00) $ 11,813.68 $ 4,007.79 $ 15,821.47 Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600D 1802824120170 BARBARA & JAY ROTHMEIER 4500 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120015 CAROL & EDWARD HANCOCK 4503 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120032 JOYCELYN ANVY MELLOM 4506 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120018 ELIZABETH S & ALEC C SHEROD 4509 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120035 VIRGIL & PATRICIA LEIH 4512 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120021 TIMOTHY J PRONLEY 4515 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120038 THOMAS D MCFERSON 4518 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120024 REGINA M. PLATT 4521 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120041 MARION & ROGER ANDERSON 4524 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120027 JEAN CAIZZO 4527 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 i ♦ Bend along line to Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 1802824120169 A.. WILLIAM HOCH JR 4501 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120031 JOSEPH W LICHTENBERGER 4504 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120017 MATTHEW E ABROE 4507 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120034 BRADLEY & PATRICIA BURLEY 4510 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120020 DAVID BEADIE 4513 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120037 MICHAEL FAY 4516 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 ® AVE 5960TP 18028.4120030 LISA FITTIPALDI 4502 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120016 TIMOTHY & MICHEEL PRONLEY 4505 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120033 MARJORIE WUNDER 4508 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120019 MARGARET & JAMES MANNIX 4511 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120036 VIRGINIA & JEFFERY SWEITZEF 4514 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120022 STEVEN LUNDBERG 4517 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120023 1802824120039 KEVIN & JACQUELINE BIDGOOD LINDA A KRAFT & ANTHONY J 4519 ARDEN AVE JOHANNES EDINA MN 55424 4520 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120040 FRANK CERRA 4522 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120026 JEANETTE WIDELL 4525 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120043 ANN & RICHARD MEYER 4528 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120025 MITCHELL T MCMILLEN 4523 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120042 PAUL & DIANA BEARMON 4526 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120028 MARY & MARK RURIK 4529 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes fadles A peter ; A RepRez A la hachure afin d w e ; ww avery com E4.E11ee� 1e . %knr1+ evcw0 actin® i _Lsens de_` rdv6ler le rebord Pop -UVm ; 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Q AVERY® 5960*" Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824120044 MICHELLE & JON B PAULEY 4530 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424' 1802824120029 KERMIT FRUECHTE 4531 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120154 1802824120173 MARJORIE K SOPER & CRAIG R BRETT D CASEBOLT WEINERT 4603 ARDEN AVE 4602 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120174 JOHN & KATHRYN BOYER 4605 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130073 MARK & STEPHANIE SCHOENING 4608 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130103 SANDRA & PETER COCHRANE 4611 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130104 KEVIN & SARA HACKLER 4615 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130078 DAVID & JOAN BOWLIN 4618 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130107 ROBERT & JOAN BONELLO 4621 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130081 ROBERT & ANNE GASKILL 4624 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130110 MARGARET & MARK JESSEN 4627 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120156 EDWARD WHITE 4606 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120172 ANDREA & BENJAMIN KNOLL 4601 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120155 MARK A GUNTER 4604 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120161 TODD & CAROL DOOLEY 4607 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130102 1802824130074 TODD & JAYNE BURKE TUTTLE PAUL & ANNE SCOGGIN 4609 ARDEN AVE 4610 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130075 JEREMY MANIAK 4612 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130077 LORI LYNN NISSEN 4616 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130106 BLAIR CARLSON 4619 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130080 LORI & RICHARD JOBIN 4622 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130109 GARY HAUCK P.O. BOX 24131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55424 1802824130083 MARK & JEAN LARSON 4628 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130076 JENNIFER KLISE & DACK RAGUS 4614 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130105 GREGORY & JILLIAN BROWN 4617 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130079 JASON S & DEBORAH S DOESCHER 4620 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130108 GINA & CHARLES TRIERWEILER 808 BOULDER LAKE CT VESTAVIA HILLS, AL 35242 1802824130082 JOHN MOYNIHAN JR 4626 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130111 REBECCA & DAVID LINDBE 4629 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 IhIcluettes fadles A peter i A Repliez h la hachure afro de ; www.aveiy.com 1 14413.— 1.. evCMW@ a -ten® 11 . Sens de rAwA,lPr In rehord Pon-UoTm ; 1- 800 -60-AVERY Ealy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600 j 1802824130084 HEATHER FERNANDEZ 4630 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130113 WILLIAM BERG 4633 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 ® Bend along line to 11 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeT" j aAVERYO 5g60T' 1802824130112 1802824130085 CHRISTIN & RANDAL HARRISON DONNA & PAUL WIESE ARBISI 4631 ARDEN AVE 4632 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130114 JOAN SWENDSEEN 4637 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130124 1802824130115 WILLIAM LOUGH II & BARBARA CATHERINE & STEVEN PANAIRE i WEBSTER 4900 ARDEN AVE 4901 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130125 GERALD SORENSEN 4904 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130118 SCOTT DILLON.& KATHARINE DANZANSKY 4907 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130128 STEPHANIE ALLISON & DAVID LILAK 4910 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130130 TODD OLSON 4914 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130122 CLINTON SCHROEDER 4917 ARDEN AVE i EDINA MN 55424 1802824120171 GERALD MARTIN 4501 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 '802824120062 dAUL S & KRISTEN F VIETZEN 4504 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130117 HUGH JONES 4905 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130127 JAMES KAKALIOS 4908 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130120 GARY & KATHRYN BROTHERS 4911 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130121 JAMES SORBORO & KARLA GLUEK 4915 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130123 AMY & MICHAEL KOLAR 4919 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120061 LEON DE WIT 4502 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120058 LAWRENCE & ROSEANNE CHENG 4505 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120153 GREGORY M ALLERS & CONNIE L MEYER P.O. BOX 24029 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130116 THOMAS J BECKEY & PATRICIA KRAEMER 4903 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130126 BENJAMIN & JUDITH RANDALL 4906 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130119 MARGARET GOETZE 4909 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130129 SUSAN JO GOLDSTEIN 4912 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130131 ROBERT ALTMAN -SEGAL 4916 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130132 THOMAS RODDIS 4920 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120059 DENISE & JUSTIN COLE 4503 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120063 RICHARD MASSOPUST JR 4506 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 Ittlquettes fadles a peler ; A Repliez A la hachure afln de ; www.avery.com ■ Mllee -1e ^n1%mr1+ Avecv0 ClAnO I _Sens de-. rdgvLler le rebord Poo -UoTm I 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to a AVERVO 5960*"" Use Avery® Template 5160a i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824120057 DIANE & JOHN WELLS 4507 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120065 SEAN KEARNEY 4510 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120054 LEONARDO & ERIN RAPALLINI 4513 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120068 JOHN & KATHERINE PLUHAR 4516 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 i 1802824120051 i LINDA SMITH 4519 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120071 ERIK J WORDELMAN 4522 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120048 BARBARA VLAMING 4525 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120176 SCOTT & KIRSTEN REWEY 4528 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120045 DAVID HOVEN 4531 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120159 GORDON SPARTZ 4603 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120064 ROBERT HILL 4508 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120055 JENNIFER & ANDREW J MATYS I K 4511 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120067 MATTHEW & JULIE WALTER 4514 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120052 TIMOTHY B JENSEN 4517 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120070 WILLIAM WHITESITT III 4520 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120049 ROBERT & CAROL 4523 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120056 DAVID & MARY GOLDSTEIN 4509 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120066 TIMOTHY O'BRIEN 4512 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120053 ROBERT BROWN 4515 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120069 RICHARD GUSTAFSON 4518 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120050 STUART & ANDREA TURNER 4521 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120072 THOMPSON JEFFREY & LORIE ERICSON 4524 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120175 BRUCE & CAROLYN LESLIE 4526 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120046 ANNE & PERRY HUNTER 4529 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120047 TODD WATCHMAKER 4527 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120074 THOMAS DILLON 4530 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120160 1802824120146 CAROL & FREDRICK ARNASON REFINED LLC 4601 BRUCE AVE 4010 GRIMES AVE SO EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55416 1802824120147 VICTORIA SLOMIANY 4604 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120158 JENNIFER & SEAN FAETH 4605 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes faciles A peler ; A Repliez h la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com ■ 1... -.1 —46 w11env0 e4 en® i . Sens de rAvAlar In rahnrd Pon -UnTM ! 1- 800-GO -AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i 0 ® Bend along line to 1 Q AVERY0 5960TA Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824120148 WILLIAM & SARA MIZE 4606 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130098 CHERYL HIRATA - DULAS & DANIEL DULAS 4609 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130046 JOEL & EMMA HUTCHESON 4612 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130095 JOANNE FARLEY 4615 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130049 MATTHEW & KRISTIN PIERRE 4618 BRUCE AVE - EDINA MN 55424 1802824130092 MADELINE CUSHMAN 4621 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130052 JAMES & RUTH MELCHER 4624 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130089 MATTHEW R & GENEVIEVE DESMOND 4627 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120157 MICHELLE & DANIEL KRAFT 4607 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130045 WILLIAM JADKOWSKI & KATHLEEN O'DEA 4610 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130096 ARDELLE SCHULTZ 4613 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130048 EMILY B & DAVID T 4616 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130093 RALPH TULLY 4619 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130044 IRINA & BRUCE LINDER 4608 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130097 MICHAEL J HARTMANN 4611 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130047 LUIS DECUBAS 4614 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130094 JOHNSON SUSAN MAKEPEACE & THOMA% BASTING JR 4617 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130051 KATHLEEN & PAUL RUNICE 4622 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130090 ELIZABETH & JOHN 4625 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130050 KEITH DOWNEY & AMY HENDRIKSE ' 4620 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130091 LI LISA GE 4623 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130053 BALAY HEATHER R & BRETT R FENSKE 4626 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130054 TRACIE & JOHN ROSSMAN 4628 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130055 1802824130087 PATRICK J & KATHERINE W TRUDI ANDERSON & JOSEPH WELLNER GREEN 4630 BRUCE AVE 4631 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130086 BARBARA & PAUL LAEDERACH 4633 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130057 EDITH BURNIER & THOMAS RAEUCHLE 4634 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130088 DAVID & HEATHER MELLOH 4629 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130056 JACQUELINE A -& BRIAN FOGELBERG 4632 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120145 BRADLEY SCHAEPPI 4600 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes faciles 3 peter It A Itepliez h la hachure afln de ; www avery com I W12 .._ i......�,...:. AIICDVO C9cn0 I Sens de n5vdler le rebord Poo -UuTM ; 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels Use Avery@ Template 51600 1802824130147 JO ELLEN SAYLOR 4900 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130138 PAULA & JOHN SWEET 4903 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130137 JILL & DANIEL MCCARTY 4907 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130163 JONATHON HORNIG 4910 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130140 LINDA MCGOWAN & ROBERT FRIED 4914 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120090 CHARLES & RAQUEL LAYTON 4501 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 i ♦ Bend along line to A Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824130139 JOHN BENSON 4901 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 aAVERY0 59607°" 1802824130146 NORRIS THOMPSON &'MICHELE FRIEDMANN 4902 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130145 1802824130144 KENNETH & MARY KAY HERUTH RENEE MAY & RICHARD MAY JF 4904 BRUCE AVE 4906 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130143 THOMAS HOGAN 4908 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130135 RICHARD B HADDAD 4911 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130133 LORI & RUSSEL ANDERSON 4919 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120089 STEPHEN MARKER 4503 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120088 1802824120093 RICHARD ALLYN & MARGARET ROBERT PATRIN BROWNELL 4506 CASCO AVE 4505 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120094 ROBIN REICHEL SMITH 4508 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120085 BRADLEY & TAMARA JOHNSON 4511 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120097 STEPHEN NELSON 4514 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120086 TIMOTHY & LISA ZELLMER 4509 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120096 DANIEL & CATHERINE HOLLERMAN 4512 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120083 MELISSA RAPHAN & ROCK 4515 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130136 MATTHEW & JANNA HOMAN 4909 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130134 TIMOTHY F & STEPHANIE RYAN 4913 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120091 SIDNEY SAMPSON 4500 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120092 JOSEPH J SULLIVAN 4504 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120087 LOUIS & MARTA KALUZA 4507 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120095 COLLIN & SUSAN BRINKMAN 4510 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120084 DIANE & JOHN AKIBA JR 4513 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120098 THOMAS VIRGINIA & GEORGE JOHNSTON 4516 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 ittlquettes fadles A peler ; A Repliez 3 la hachure afro de ; www avery com �_�....r....� �.�..A _ Sens de .�,.��...1e —k...4 D.—JI -TM ! Utnn.GMAVERY Easy Peel® Labels i • Bend along line to Use Avery® Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824120082 1802824120099 SUSAN & MICHAEL LEWIS J DUDLEY & R R JONES 4517 CASCO AVE 4518 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120100 1802824120080 TIMOTHY & MARY SHANNAHAN BRETT. HEFFES 4520 CASCO AVE 4521 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120079 BRENDA & DONALE MCCORMICK III 4523 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120103 JEFFREY W DEWING 4526 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120076 . JAMES & AMY VOSE 4529 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120106 LESLIE A KREOFSKY 4532 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120151 DAVID ANDERSON 4603 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120102 ROBERT & PATRICIA SYKES 4524 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120077 MARK R PLATT P.O. BOX 390 VICTORIA MN 55386 1802824120105 STEVEN & CATHERINE CARLSON 4530 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120152 TROY & MICHELLE EIGNER 4601 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120140 DEWAYNE PETERSEN 4604 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 * AVERY® 5960n 1802824120081 SUSAN & THOMAS WILSON 4519 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120101 KRISTA & J WESLEY RATLIFF 4522 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120078 LEO & MARILYN PERTL 4525 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120104 SCOTT M TAYLOR & ANNE M H HUNTER 4528 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120075 JOHN & CARLA TEMPLE 4531 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120139 ROBB GUTOWSKY 4602 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120150 DEAN BACHMEIER & CAROL GREENLAND 4605 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120141 1802824120149 1802824130015 JAMES & LISA KORSLUND AMY & DAVID BATTEL CHRISTINE & RICHARD c/o MOLITOR & ASSOCIATES 4607 CASCO AVE PASSOLT JR 4530 WEST 77TH ST SUITE 219 EDINA MN 55424 4608 CASCO AVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130072 1802824130016 1802824130071 HEIDI BRIGGS CAROL KAST & STUART ADLER KATHRYN & ERIC THOMSON 4609 CASCO AVE II 4611 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 4610 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130017 1802824130070 1802824130018 CYNTHIA & DAVID FARMER PHYLLIS CARTER TIMOTHY HENDRICKS 4612 CASCO AVE 4613 CASCO AVE 4614 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes faciles peter ; A Repliez A la hachure afin d e ; Sens de_` ww avery com w 1 +:reev Ie ..fttiM.:+ elfcw@ sman® l rMler le rebord Pon -UW"A ; 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Q AVERYO 596OTN i Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeTM Use Avery® Template 51600 j 1802824130069 PATRICK WETHINGTON 4615 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130020 ONAN THOMPSON 4618 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130066 LAWRENCE POBUDA 4621 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 ' 1802824130023 PATRICK & GWEN GARRISON 4624 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130019 DAWN & DAVID BUCHANAN 4616 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130067 SUSAN & MARK CHRISTENSEN 4619 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130022 JEFFREY & WENDY WOJNICZ 4622 CASCO AVE j EDINA MN 55424 1802824130064 BRIAN WARPINSKI 4625 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130068 JAMES & JULIE WOHLFORD 4617 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130021 GAIL SIMONS 4620 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130065 JEFFREY GISSELBECK 4623 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130024 MARK & ELIZABETH A ENGEL 4626 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130063 1802824130025 1802824130062 BARBARA BRAUER ELIZABETH & TODD SHUMAN JUDITH L EARLING 4627 CASCO AVE 4628 CASCO AVE 4629 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130026 1802824130061 1802824130027 KIMBERLY & ROBERT PETER & SUZANNE MAGNUSON MARY WILLIAMS GREIG BOISVERT JR 4630 CASCO AVE 4631 CASCO AVE 4632 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130060 KATHRYN & BRADLEY NELSON 4633 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130028 NORTHERN HOLDINGS VI LLC 4634 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130029 1802824130058 TRUDIE R & MARK D SPRENKLE RONALD SHARP 4636 CASCO AVE 4637 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 i EDINA MN 55424 1802824120138 LUANN & THOMAS ZUMWALDE 4600 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130166 SUSAN & SCOT HOUSH 4209 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824130148 RICHARD M DORN 4203 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824130151 CATHERINE & TIMOTHY HAYDEN 4215 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824130059 ELIZABETH CAMERON 4635 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130030 RICHARD & SUSAN JOHNSTON 4638 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130165 PATRICIA & PAUL CURRAN 4207 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824130152 BROOKE W ALLOCCO 4221 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes fatales 3 paler ; A Repliez h la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com ,_ Atfien%A eAen® , Sens de MwAlor In rahnni Pnn-11nTM 1 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to 11 Feed P Pop-Up Ede* Q AVERY® 5960n Use Avery® Template 5160® Feeaper �� expose op-p g"" j 1802824130153 1802824130154 1802824120121 ALEXANDER BAINBRIDGE PATRICIA CARLSON MARGARET & JEFFREY HALL 4225 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4229 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4500 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120120 1802824120122 1802824120119 RALPH & JAN HERDA WILLIAM J MATSCH III DAVID WAHOFF 4501 DREXEL AVE 4502 DREXEL AVE 4503 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120123 1802824120118 1802824120124 SARA L BONELLO JOHN HART MATTHEW GRIMES 4504 DREXEL AVE 4505 DREXEL AVE 4506 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120117 1802824120125 1802824120116 SAMUEL & STACY RITER CHARLES WASHAM III KEITH A & CARRIE A WHITE 4507 DREXEL AVE 4508 DREXEL AVE 4509 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120126 1802824120115 1802824120127 JANE & JOHN LONNQUIST KATHRYN & TERRY SANDVEN GERALD D SZYKULSKI 4510 DREXEL AVE 4511 DREXEL AVE 4512 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120114 1802824120128 1802824120113 THOMAS & CATHERINE HALL DOUGLAS & LISA GERVAIS MICHAEL BLECK & LAURIE 4513 DREXEL AVE 4514 DREXEL AVE ZENNER EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 4515 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120129 1802824120112 1802824120130 ROBERT WEBB ERIC ABOUSSOUAN ABBIE & C SCOTT THISS 4516 DREXEL AVE 4517 DREXEL AVE 4518 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120111 1802824120131 1802824120110 KIMBERLY PRICE TIMOTH D BERGESON PAUL M HYDE 4519 DREXEL AVE 4520 DREXEL AVE 4610 CASCADE LA EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55436 1802824120132 1802824120109 1802824120133 PETER SENG & STACY ENXING JOHN KINGSLEY -HEFTY MICHELLE L & BRIAN W OLSON SENG 4523 DREXEL AVE 4524 DREXEL AVE 4522 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120108 1802824120134 1802824120107 3EVERLY ROSENBERG DOUGLAS & SHARON PUGH M C MILLER & T A THELEN 4525 DREXEL AVE 4526 DREXEL AVE 4527 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 I€tiquetties faciles 3 peter ; A Repliez h la hachure afin de www.avery com ■ ■•:u, w..:w w..:...:a A %#Cov@ Cgrne 1 Sens de Is rebord Poo -UDm I 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i AVERV@ sg60T" Use Avery@ Template 51600 j Feed Paper - expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824120144 1802824120136 1802824120143 CHRISTOPHER & CHRISTEEN MARCIA A MCCORMICK THOMAS ANDERSON PAULISON HERMAN 4603 DREXEL AVE 4601 DREXEL AVE 4602 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120137 1802824120142 1802824130002 MARIE & EDWARD JACKSON KEVIN TAUER DONALD GEESAMAN 4604 DREXEL AVE 4605 DREXEL AVE 4606 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130043 1802824130003 1802824130042 DWIGHT SOUCY DIANE & CHARLES MASSIE THE MARY SUE SIMON QPRT 4607 DREXEL AVE 4608 DREXEL AVE 1495 INNSBRUCK DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55432 1802824130004 1802824130041 1802824130005 PEGGY & JOHN STEPHENS STEPHEN & CHERYL BEISANG KEITH T JUNGELS 4610 DREXEL AVE 4611 DREXEL AVE 4612 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130040 1802824130006 1802824130039 GREGORY & JISELLE GRAVES THEODORE CHRISTIANSON MATTHEW J BERTRAM 4613 DREXEL AVE 4614 DREXEL AVE 4615 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 I EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130007 1802824130038 1802824130008 RICHARD STROMME KAREN & NICHOLAS ROGERS JULIE GILLETTE & THOMAS NP 4616 DREXEL AVE 4617 DREXEL AVE JOHNS JR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 4618 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130037 1802824130009 1802824130036 KARL & HEATHER DEXHEIMER GLENCOE PROPERTIES LLC DONALD & SHARON 4619 DREXEL AVE 5829 E JEAN AVENUE FLEISCHMANN EDINA MN 55424 PHOENIX AZ 85018 4621 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824130010 1802824130035 1802824130011 JOHN & CATHERINE COTE WILLIAM RICHARDS DANIEL DELIANEDIS WOLF 4623 DREXEL AVE 4624 DREXEL AVE 4622 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130034 1802824130012 1802824130033 SCOTT BOWLBY JAMES JACKSON CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN . 4625 DREXEL AVE 4626 DREXEL AVE 4627 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824130032 1802824130014 1802824130031 PATRICK & SAMANTHA CONLIN BRIGHT DORNBLASER KATHRYN HAYMAKER 4629 DREXEL AVE 4630 DREXEL AVE 4633 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 I€tiquettes fadles A peler ; Repliez A la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com ; r+uoee� ie nmkmr:+ auccw@ Sian@ 1 _Sens de_. r6v6ler le rebord Po"DTm ; 1- 800 -GO -AVERY i tasy reel- taoeis i A Bend along line to i UA AVERY® 5960'" Usk Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge*^° i V 1802824120135 MICHAEL O'ROURKE 4600 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824120168 D C BJORKMAN & W M LEHMAN 4100 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120165 STEVEN L & MARGARET M POLACEK 4106 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120162 CHERYLE & ANDREW ATKIN 4112 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120002 KIM M SCHMID 4116 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120005 GREGORY ENGEN 4200 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120008 MARY BETH & DAVID ANDERSON 4206 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120011 NORMAN & BERTHA BLEMASTER 4212 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120014 JOANNE & WILLIAM PATTERSON 4218 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824130156 NILOOFAR & FARZAD FARHANGNIA i 2 EDINA CT 1 EDINA MN 55424 1802824120167 JOHN NEALON 4102 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120164 MARY & RONALD LAMBERTON 4108 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120001 BRAD BEGLEY 4114 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120003 BARBARA & JAMES EPPEL JR 4118 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120006 JON CARLSON & KARLENE BECK 6260 REGINA LA BEAUMONT TX 77706 1802824120009 DAVID THOMPSON 4208 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120012 RONNIE ERHARDT 4214 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824130157 ADAM & ANGELA AILLONI 3 EDINA CT EDINA MN 55424 1802824120166 MICHAEL & DIANE FEWER 4104 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120163 LAURA & DAVID YONCE 4110 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120060 ANDREW C SELDEN 4115 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120004 PETER BITTERMAN & CYNTHIA GROSS 4120 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120007 SARAH TRUESDELL & DAVID ETZWILER 4204 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120010 MARGARET & JEFFREY KEYES 4210 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824120013 DAVID DAHL & EILEEN O'SHAUGHNESSY 4216 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 I€tiquettes fadles 3 peter ; Repliez A la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utillsez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 11 chSens dent MOW le rebord Pop -110 - j 1- 800 -GO -AVERY j -A SEH MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works and City Engineer FROM: Chad Millner DATE: September 29, 2010 RE: 4506 Arden Avenue Concrete Curb and Gutter SEH No. AEDINA050301 14.00 On September 29, 2010 we inspected the concrete curb and gutter installed in front of 4506 Arden Avenue during fall of 2008 as part of the Country Club Area Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction Project (Project). Figure 1 shows in detail the severity of the cracking, whereas the 'Y' made by white spray paint in Figure 2 shows the two panels where the cracking is occurring. Figure 1.4506 Arden Avenue — Cracked Concrete Curb and Gutter Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax 4506 Arden Avenue Concrete Curb and Gutter September 29, 2010 Page 2 Figure 2.4506 Arden Avenue — Cracked Concrete Curb and Gutter The cracking meets the criteria of the contract documents for removal and replacement as part of the warranty work. The Project will have a final walkthrough during May or June 2011 to quantify any other warranty related items. We understand that Palda will complete all warranty work by August 1, 2011. cm c: Paul Pasko, SEH Joe Clement, SEH Tony Deutsch, Palda and Sons, Inc p:\ae\e \edina \050301 \Ica \14\4506 arden s h memo.do JOYCE MELLOM RECEIVED ATTORNEY AT LAw SEP 2 8 2010 PO Box 24068 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55424 TEL. (952) 920 -3002 0 FAX (952) 9154413 www. M E LLo M LAW O FFI C E. C O M JMELLOMOLAWYER.COM September 29, 2010 Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50P St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: Street Improvement No. A -213: Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction Property PID: 1802824120032 Property Address: 4506 Arden Av. Dear Edina City Council: Please accept this letter as Objection to the proposed special assessment of $11,468.98 for the property referenced above. The basis for the Objection is the defective cement work in front of my house. There are four major cracks in the cement running perpendicular to the street and include the cement curb and gutter to the asphalt. I have attached three photos. I also have photos which can be accessed online and which better show the extent of the defect. The defective cement is very unfortunate given the magnitude of the project. I understand that with the freeze /thaw cycle of weather in Minnesota cracks in cement only get worse, never better. On 11/2/20091 sent an email regarding cracks in the curbs to Chad Millner, Project Engineer at SEH, Inc. who responded on 11/3/2009 saying they would look at it in the spring. The emails are attached. On 8/11/20101 sent another email to Mr. Millner who responded on 8/13/2010 stating, in part, that "your address was reviewed this past spring and it did not meet the requirements for replacement." The emails are attached. That the full extent of the defect and whether it will be corrected is not clear. That an assessment of $11,468.98 is not appropriate given the nature and extent of the defect. That I seek either a new curb /gutter, with no cracks, or a reduced special assessment. Thank you. Sincerely, o ce ellom Attorney at Law JAM /com enclosures Joyce Mellom Subject: FW: curbs at 4506 Arden From: cmillner@seh.inc.com m ' •cmillner @sehinc.com] Sent: Tue da November 03 2009 1:23 PM o: Joyce Mellom Subject: Re: curbs at 4506 Arden To <cmionerCdjsehinc.com> cc Subject curbs at 4506 Arden Joyce, We will. If needed, concrete warranty work will occur next May / June. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, PE Project Engineer SEH, Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 200 Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9301 952.912.2633 cmiliner cD-sehinc.com www.sehinc.com "Joyce Mellom" mellom0lavwer.coV, 11 /02/2009 03:14 PM Chad: I was out raking yesterday and notice several cracks in the curb in front of my house. Can you take a look at this? Thanks. Joyce Mellom Attorney at Law PO Box 24068 Minneapolis, MN 55424 Tel: (952) 920 -3002 Fax: (952) 915 -4413 www.MellomLawoffice.com imellomCllawver.com 1 Joyce Mellom Subject: curbs at 4506 Arden Fro inc.com mailto: Iner @sehinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 9:02 AM o. oyce Mellom Subject: Re: FW: curbs at 4506 Arden Joyce, Thanks for your comments. Your address was reviewed this past spring and it did not meet the requirements for replacement. We have one more year left on the warranty period. I have added your address to the list to review next May / June to see if the area in question has gotten worse and needs to be replaced. If you have any other questions or concerns about the project please contact me either by e- mail or at 952.912.2633. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, PE Project Engineer SEH, Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9301 952.912.2633 cmillnerOsehinc.com www.sehinc.com "Joyce Mellom" <imellom(m-lawver.com> CO:B/:11/:201:00EOOPM Chad: Any progress on repairs of cracks in the curbs in the CC area? Thanks. I know it's a headache. Joyce Mellom Attorney at Law PO Box 24068 Minneapolis, MN 55424 Tel: (952) 920 -3002 Fax: (952) 915 -4413 www.MellomLawOffice.com imellom lawver.com To <=i11ner0seh1nc.com> ce Subject FW: curbs at 4506 Arden JOYCE MELLOM ATTORNEY AT LAW PO BOX 24068 MINNEAFOUS. MINNESOTA 55424 'I-L. (952) 920-3002 0 FAX (952) 9154413 WWW.MELL0MLAW0rr10E.00M JMELLOMOLAWYER.COM September 30, 2010 Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 5& St. Edina, MN 554241394 .._... . i 0`�� A RE: Street Improvement No. A-213: Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction Property PID: 1802824120032 Property Address: 4506 Arden Av. Dear Edina City Council: Please accept this letter as Addendum to my 9/29/10 Objection to Special Assessment. I received a call from Chad Millner on 9129/10 who advised they would replace the cracked curb /gutter in front of my house next spring. I will keep my 9/29/10 Objection on file with the City Council for the record. I also note that the big, mature elm tree in front of my house is sickly. Jeff Rick, arborist for Rainbow Treecare, advised on 9/1/2010 that the aim is not suffering from Dutch Elm disease but rather from trauma, likely due to the cutting of the tree roots during the skeettsewer work in 2008. Thus I may be facing another big bill in 2011 if the elm needs to be removed and another tree planted. Furthermore the elm disease treatment and rootcare fertilization I have done for many years will all be for naught. I would like this objection noted for the record as well. Thank you. Sin erely, L&.12e� oy & may at Law JAM /com Z'd ETbi�STSZSS woTTaW 80Ror WdTV:E OTOZ 06 daS JJ SEH EDINA, MINNESOTA COUNTRY CLUB AREA SEWER, WATER, AND STREL I CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 08-1 SEH NO. AEDINA0503.01 FINAL PROJECT COSTS 2/14/2008 Rwbed: 17117109 9RR0I0 Updv,d using p-mslToel Project Casts PMVEFd' WM1VCAVMV e®a Qele4h1,d Om-rd A rA 1cs61A ®� City Finance_ Goals Country Club A -213 4 $154 473 95: SEH Feeh $2,320,170.61 Country Club A -214 $14443�2ti Country ClubL -03 t 5171446T Country Club L -09 �i- ....:..: ;520,391,59; Total $3,995,553.07 $15,174.14 $19,210.00 .12,035.95 A -214 Assessment Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and the Right -of -Way Line $125,474.09 REU's per Final Estimated Total -$981 Assessment District Final °/. of Total Assessment Rate City Mlsc Expenses Irtigati on / Pet Final Project Cost w/o City Financing Costs per REU Project Cost $84 Item Construction Cost Constructi on Consulting Fee's Engineering/ per City General Fence Repairs City Financing Costs During Construction Final Project Cost from 1128/07 Difference (4) Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and $183,500.86 Costs $4,705.15 Clerical Costs - Ledger (1) the Rig ht -ot Way Line During Construction Feasibility Study Storm Sewer STS -297 $1,242,709.50 9.60% $222,621.41 $2140 $995 Streets/Sidewaft $1,465,330.91 323.68 $1,465,330.91 $1,188,000.00 $277.330.91 §anftary Sewer SS 413 $1,904,031.31 14.70% $341,091.90 $2,245,123.21 $2,245,123.21 $2,670,000.00 -$424,876.7 Water Main WM-435 $3.815.072.051 29.46% $683,439.48 1 $4.498.511.53 $4.498.511.53 $5.206.000.00 -$7D7.488.471 Lighting L•43 A -213 $299664.06 2.31% $53,602.41 $353 346.47 i:i 3; 2c< rti:< 17,144.67, $370,491.14 $458,000.00 $87.5 . 6 Lighting L -09 214 $356 415.47 2.75% $63,848.96 $420,264A3 s? 20391.591 $440,656. $587,000.00 -$126,343.98 A-213 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk $154,064.00 1.19% $27,599.33 $ 181,663.33 `!;y i `• "" "``$7877,.59 :_ .,,.•_, 37:5 $183,500.86 $2,065,000.00 - $1,881,499.14 Pi and the Right-of-Way Line A-213 Streets & Sidewalks $2,635 041.57 20.35% $472,046.51 $4,452.2 $15,240.28 $62,144.03 $3.188,924.65 :. ; �::�; •.? $152,636:43 $3,341,561.08 $2,555,000.00 $788,561.08 X214 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk $105,414.36 0.81% $18,884.13 $124,298.49 :> „$1 175 60 $125,474.09 $1,378,000.00 - $1,252,525.91 Pipe and the Right -0f - -Way Una A-214 Streets & Sidewalks 2 439 163.24 18.83% $436 958.48 $4,344.23 $14,409.201 $87,219.02, 2 982 092.17 :' .:ar:��- `: 143.262.66 $3,125,354.84 $2 834 000.00 91 354.84 Total $12,9fi1,fi76.6B $2,320,770.61 $15,459,655.78 $18,721,000.00 32,924,996.93 Total $3,995,553.07 $15,174.14 $19,210.00 .12,035.95 A -214 Assessment Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and the Right -of -Way Line $125,474.09 REU's per Final Rate Reported -$981 Assessment District Total Project Cost Assessment Assessment Rate by 11/28107 Difference (5) Streets/Sidewalks _12L25,35.4.84 District per REU Feasibility $84 Study (3) A -213 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and $183,500.86 39 $4,705.15 $SAOO - $1,695 the Rig ht -ot Way Line Street Llgliting i $370.491.141 323.66 i $1,144.69 $2140 $995 Streets/Sidewaft 1 $3,341,561.081 323.68 1 E10.324.291 $9,6701 $654 Total $3,995,553.07 $15,174.14 $19,210.00 .12,035.95 A -214 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and the Right -of -Way Line $125,474.09 25 $5,018.96 $6,000 -$981 Street Lighting $440,656.02 232 $1,899.38 $3,36 - $1,466 Streets/Sidewalks _12L25,35.4.84 232 13 471.36 $13 535 $84 Total $3,9a1,494.a5 f2u,J9a.ru *",Vuu.uu gL,D1 u.Ju Notes: (1) Mlsc expenses Include Omen Intedac matsdal tesOrp, coping conirad doaunents and ma0np. postage for neighborhood nm9ngs, etc. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -214, L-49 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street LI htin Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824220040 BARRY & CHRISTY ZILKA 4400 BROWNDALE AVE 4400 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13471.36 $20,389.70 1802824220041 JOHN C WALDEN 4402 BROWNDALE AVE 4402 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210016 DANA ALPETER 4405 BROWNDALE AVE 4405 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 13,471.361 $15,370.74 1802824220062 WILLIAM JARRETT JR 4500 BROWNDALE AVE 4500 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210034 DOUGLAS EDEN 4501 BROWNDALE AVE 4501 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.3a $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220061 ROBERT DE BREY 4502 BROWNDALE AVE 4502 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210035 SCHELE & PHILIP I SMITH 4503 BROWNDALE AVE 4503 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220060 KEITH WOODWARD 4504 BROWNDALE AVE 4504 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210036 JOANNE & JOHN GORDON 4505 BROWNDALE AVE 4505 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220093 CYNTHIA & KEVIN BINGHAM 4506 BROWNDALE AVE 4506 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74. 1802824210037 FRANK & JANET LEDERLE 4507 BROWNDALE AVE 4507 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.741 1802824210038 REBECCA & STEPHEN BRIGGS 4509 1BROWNDALEAVE 4509 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210039 WILLIAM & NANCY HORN 4511 BROWNDALE AVE 4511 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210040 DAVID PEARSON 4513 BROWNDALE AVE 4513 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210041 ANN & BRUCE CHRISTENSEN 4515 BROWNDALE AVE 4515 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220079 ALLYSON & TODD ALDRICH 4518 BROWNDALE AVE 4518 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824230055 MARY & ALAN HOGG 4520 BROWNDALE AVE 4520 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802624240073 FRANK LUSHINE 4500 BROWNDALE AVE 4600 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210109 JODI CHU 4601 BROWNDALE AVE 4601 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240074 JESSICA ANN PERRY SLOBBER 4602 IBROWNDALEAVE 4602 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240046 MARK & LAURA JORDAHL 4603 BROWNDALE AVE 4603 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240075 VIRGINA K LINDOW 4604 BROWNDALE AVE 4604 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240047 STEVEN & KRISTIN VEKER 4605 BROWNDALE AVE 4605 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240048 JOAN & JOSEPH CRONIN 4607 BROWNDALE AVE 4607 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240049 REBECCA & PAUL WALSER 4609 BROWNDALE AVE 4609 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13.471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240076 MARC & KREEA ASHTON 4610 BROWNDALE AVE 4610 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240050 SHELDON & TERRY FLECK 4611 BROWNDALE AVE 4611 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240051 JANE & CLIFFORD TANEY 4613 BROWNDALE AVE 4613 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240052 KEVIN HYKES 4615 BROWNDALE AVE 4615 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824240086 CHARLES S ANDERSON & LAURIE G DEMARTINO 4616 BROWNDALE AVE 4616 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240053 GARY & ROISIN LASKIN 4617 BROWNDALE AVE 4617 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240054 KENNETH T EVERSON 4619 BROWNDALE AVE 4619 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240087 DAVID J & LISA BOSS 4620 BROWNDALE AVE 4620 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1,899.381 13 471.36 $15 370.74 1802824240055 MILAGROS & VINCENTE QUIMBO 4621 BROWNDALE AVE 4621 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240056 KURTIS J WINTERS & CHRISTINE KASSAB 4623 BROWNDALE AVE 4623 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824240088 CLAIRE & JACK DEMPSEY 4624 IBROWNDALEAVE 4624 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240057 JOHN W THIEL 4625 BROWNDALE AVE 4625 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240056 MICHELE & JONATHAN EISELE 4627 BROWNDALE AVE 4627 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240089 WILLIAM R & LISA MARIE QUIRK 4628 BROWNDALE AVE 4628 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240059 MADONNA CLARK 4629 BROWNDALE AVE 4629 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240090 SUNG -JIN J & CARRIE J CHANG 4632 BROWNDALE AVE 4632 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38. $13471.36 $15 370.74 1802824240091 JANE B JACOBS 4901 BROWNDALE AVE 4901 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240093 DOUGLAS NELSON 4905 BROWNDALE AVE 4905 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240092 FAITH MAGNUSON 4909 IBROWNDALEAVE 4909 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1899.38 $13,471.36 $15370.74 1802824240098 KEITH & KATHRYN PETERSON 4303 JCOUNTRYCLUBRD 4303 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370. 1802824240099 WILLIAM ELLIOTT 4305 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4305 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $16,370.74 1802824240100 SUSAN BENNETT 4401 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4401 COUNTRY CLUB RD JEDINA MN 55424 1 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240101 ALEXANDER WARE 4403 ICOUNTRY CLUB RD 4403 COUNTRY CLUB RD JEDINA MN 55424 1 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 Page 1 of 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A•214, 449 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824240102 MICHAEL & ANNE HALL 4405 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4405 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $16,370.74 1802824240103 LOUISE PRICE 4407 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4407 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240060 GORDON B ASSELSTINE 4408 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4408 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13.471.36 $16,370.74 1802824240104 IJOSEPH & SUZANNE SULLIVAN 4409 COUNTRY CLUB RD 4409 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.7 1802824240077 LAURENCE SMITH 4612 EDGEBROOK PL 4612 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824230056 DONALD HULLSTRAND 4614 EDGEBROOK PL 4614 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.38 $15,370.74 1802824230057 MARY & THEODORE ADAMS 4618 EDGEBROOK PL 4618 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.38 $15370.74 1802824230058 NORMAN & MARY BETH CHAPEL 4622 EDGEBROOK PL 4622 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240081 MICHAEL BINGHAM 4626 EDGEBROOK PL 4626 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240082 CHAD H KELLY 4630 EDGEBROOK PL 4630 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13.471.36 $15.370.74 1802824240083 MARK & GRETCHEN BANKS 4634 IEDGEBROOKPL 4634 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.7 1802824240084 PAUL & SUZANNE CROWE 4638 1EDGEBROOK PL 4638 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370. 1802824240085 CONSTANCE & WILLIAM HADDELAND 4640 EDGEBROOK PL 4640 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210068 ELINOR LUCAS 4500 EDINA BLVD 4500 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210069 DONNA DUDLEY 4501 EDINA BLVD 4501 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471. 38 $15,370.74 1802824210067 TIMOTHY W ZOSEL 4502 EDINA BLVD 4502 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210070 STUART & MARY HARVEY 4503 EDINA BLVD 4503 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210066 SARA & BRIAN ASLESEN 4504 EDINA BLVD 4504 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210071 IKATHERINE S & ANDREW J ENGEL 4505 EDINA BLVD 4505 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824210065 MARIE & RICHARD THORPE 4506 EDINA BLVD 4506 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210072 ROBERT RAMSAY 4507 EDINA BLVD 4507 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210064 STEVEN B WELD 4508 EDINA BLVD 4508 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210073 JILL TRAUTZ 4509 EDINA BLVD 4509 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210063 E W MACLENNAN 4510 EDINA BLVD 4510 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.74 1802824210074 STEVEN SWAIN 4511 EDINA BLVD 4511 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210062 ELSIE & A RICHARD WEILER 4512 EDINA BLVD 4512 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210075 DANIEL DAY 4513 EDINA BLVD 4513 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370. 1802824210061 DWIGHT & CYNTHIA HAGER 4514 IEDINA BLVD 4514 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210076 PETER & LAURA GIDEON 4515 IEDINABLVD 4515 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13471.36 $20,389.70 1802824210060 GREGORY & PATRICIA SALMI 4516 EDINA BLVD 4516 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210077 MARY LYNN & WARREN STALEY 4517 EDINA BLVD 4517 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210078 JAMES & JULIE WOHLFORD 4519 EDINA BLVD 4519 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 5542 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210108 SUZANNE & DANIEL ILTEN 4600 EDINA BLVD 4600 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210103 KURT & ELLEN DAHLQUIST 4601 EDINA BLVD 4601 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240045 WILLIAM C ALLDREDGE 4602 EDINA BLVD 4602 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210104 MARK W GREINER 4603 EDINA BLVD 4603 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240044 LAURIE & WILLIAM MACLEAN 4604 EDINA BLVD 4604 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240013 BRENDA & KENNETH DELECKI 4605 EDINA BLVD 4605 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13.471.36 $15.370.74 1802824240043 THOMAS & DIANE ERICKSON 4606 EDINA BLVD 4606 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240014 JANE & GARY TYGESSON 4607 EDINA BLVD 4607 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240042 JAMES HICKEY JR & TRAEY HICKEY 4608 EDINA BLVD 4608 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240015 LEANNE & STEPHEN PONTIUS 4609 EDINA BLVD 4609 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240041 PATRICIA DILL 4610 EDINA BLVD 4610 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38. $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240016 LOREN & KATHLEEN VORLICKY 4611 EDINA BLVD 4611 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240040 FREDERICK W WEBB JR 4612 EDINA BLVD 4612 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $1137074 1802824240017 JULIE & DOUGLAS BAKER 4613 EDINA BLVD 4613 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $15,3Z 0.74 1802824240039 DEREK & PATRICIA MALMQUIST 4614 EDINA BLVD 4614 EDINA BLVD IEDINA MN 55424 1 $1,899.381 $13,471.361 $15,370.741 1802824240018 JENNIFER & EDWARD COLLINS 1 4615 IEDINA BLVD 14615 EDINA BLVD JEDINA MN 55424 1 $5,018.961 $1,899.381 $13,471.361 $20 369.70 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -214, L -49 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lightina Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824240019 JAMES & MIRIAM STAKE 4617 EDINA BLVD 4617 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240020 FRANK L WHEELER 4619 EDINA BLVD 4619 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1,699.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240021 JAMES & BETSY ANDERSON 4621 EDINA BLVD 4621 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 13 471.38 $15,370.74 1802824210050 CHARLES TURNER 4500 IMOORLANDAVE 4500 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.7 4 1802824210051 VIRGINIA & MICHAEL MAHONEY 4501 MOORLAND AVE 4501 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.7 0 1802824210049 JEAN & ROBERT KENNEDY 4502 MOORLAND AVE 4502 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824210052 MARGARET SHIDEMAN 4503 MOORLAND AVE 4503 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824210048 SUSAN S THATCHER 4504 MOORLAND AVE 4504 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210053 JANE & ROBERT OBERRENDER 4505 MOORLAND AVE 4505 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210047 JEFFREY & SHANNON AWSUMB 4506 MOORLAND AVE 4506 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13.471.36 $16.370.74 1802824210054 DAVID & KATHLEEN MACLENNAN 4507 MOORLAND AVE 4507 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210046 LISA & JOHN SOLBERG 4508 IMOORLAND AVE 4508 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210055 RICHARD STURGEON 4509 IMOORLAND AVE 4509 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210045 MARTIN & PATRICIA MCKINLEY 4510 IMOORLANDAVE 4510 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210056 WILLIAM MELTON 4511 MOORLAND AVE 4511 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210044 CARY HUMPHRIES 4512 MOORLAND AVE 4512 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210057 LINDA A DUPERE 4513 MOORLAND AVE 4513 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13.471.36 $15.370.74 1802824210043 THOMAS COLLINS 4514 MOORLAND AVE 4514 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210058 ANDREW WEISS & AMY KAISER 4515 MOORLAND AVE 4515 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210042 JULIE & RICHARD ARMBRUST 4516 MOORLAND AVE 4516 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1602824210059 MARYANN PARKER 4517 MOORLAND AVE 4517 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210110 FREDERICK RICHARDS II 4600 MOORLAND AVE 4600 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210107 ELIZABETH & DANIEL R MAYLEBEN 4601 MOORLAND AVE 4601 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240071 HAROLD & MARGARET HOPPMANN 4602 MOORLAND AVE 4602 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.74 1802824240030 JONATHAN CLEVELAND 4603 MOORLAND AVE 4603 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240070 MICHAEL MADISON 4604 MOORLAND AVE 4604 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240031 PAUL & MARY THIBEAU 4605 MOORLAND AVE 4605 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.L6 $15,370.74 1802824240069 ANDREW & NELLIE BAUER 4606 MOORLAND AVE 4606 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240032 JULIE SUNDBERG & C D CLEARY 4607 MOORLAND AVE 4607 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240068 WILLIAM D & CINDY J SMITH 4608 MOORLAND AVE 4608 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802624240033 MICHAEL D & HEIDI JO NORMAN 4609 MOORLAND AVE 4609 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1,899.381 13 471.36 $15 370.74 1802624240067 RHONDA & RORY O'NEILL 4610 MOORLAND AVE 4610 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240034 MURAD S & JANE VELANI 4611 MOORLAND AVE 4611 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370. 74 1802824240066 RUSSELL & NANDY PETRELLA 4612 MOORLAND AVE 4612 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.7 1802824240065 TYLER L NASIEDLAK 4614 MOORLAND AVE 4614 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240035 ELIZABETH & CHARLES MOOTY 4615 MOORLAND AVE 4615 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240064 JON REISNER & ANN TERESA FERREIRA 4616 MOORLAND AVE 4616 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240036 SCOTT GAGE 4617 MOORLANDAVE 4617 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1899.38 $13471.36 $15370.74 1802824240063 BRUCE BARCLAY 4618 MOORLAND AVE 4618 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13.471.36 $16.370.74 1802824240105 LEE U & BONNIE SPEER MCGRATH 4619 MOORLAND AVE 4619 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.7 4 1802824240062 MARILYN B BORDEWICK 4620 MOORLAND AVE 4620 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240061 ANDREW WALSER 4622 MOORLAND AVE 4622 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13 471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210031 CLAUDIA & PAUL CARR 4300 SUNNYSIDE RD 4300 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471. $15 370.74 1802824210030 JAY & LEAH LINDGREN 4302 SUNNYSIDE RD 4302 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210029 JAMES & ANITA HIDDING 4304 SUNNYSIDE RD 4304 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210028 HILORY & DOUGLAS SEATON 4306 SUNNYSIDE RD 4306 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13 471.38 $1137074 1802824210027 JEFFREY & LAURA PECK 4400 SUNNYSIDE RD 4400 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5 018.96 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $20 389.70 1802824210026 PETER & SHEILA LIND 4402 SUNNYSIDE RD 4402 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.381 $13,471.361 15 370.74 Page 3 of 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -214, L-49 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824210025 PEETER & PATRICIA KIVESTU 4404 SUNNYSIDE RD 4404 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210024 DIANE & DONAL MULLIGAN 4406 SUNNYSIDE RD 4406 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471. $15,370.74 1802824210023 KARRI & MARK COPMAN 4408 SUNNYSIDE RD 4408 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 15 370.74 1802824210022 EROL LIKE & KARIN TANSEK 4410 SUNNYSIDE RD 4410 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 13 471.36 $15 370.74 1802824210021 PAUL & BETSY VON KUSTER 4500 SUNNYSIDE RD 4500 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 $13,471.36 $15.370.741 1802824210020 EDWARD & ELIZABETH CUSSLER 4502 SUNNYSIDE RD 4502 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1.899.381 13 471.36 $15.370.741 1802824210019 KAREN KELLY 4504 SUNNYSIDE RD 4504 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210018 BRIAN & SUSAN PETERSEN 4506 SUNNYSIDE RD 4506 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 $13,471.36 $15,370. 1802824210017 KEITH & MARILYN WEST 4510 SUNNYSIDE RD 4510 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1,899.381 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220042 LISA & F CLAYTON MILLER 4600 SUNNYSIDE RD 4600 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 13 471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220063 CYNTHIA & STEPHEN SNYDER 4601 ISUNNYSIDE RD 4601 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1.899.381 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220043 RICHARD A & KATHRYN V ROEDEL 4602 SUNNYSIDE RD 4602 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 1.899.381 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824220064 ROBERT BARRIE & KRIS WONG 4603 SUNNYSIDE RD 4603 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1.899.381 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220065 CHRISTOPHER & SUSAN JOHNSON 4605 SUNNYSIDE RD 4605 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.381 $13 471.36 15 370.74 1802824220044 WILLIAM & BARBARA BEARD 4606 SUNNYSIDE RD 4606 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220045 JANICE & CHARLES BUTH 4700 SUNNYSIDE RD 4700 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220066 JOSHUA & THERESA WALDMAN 4701 SUNNYSIDE RD 4701 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220046 ROBERT & PATRICIA DILLON 4702 SUNNYSIDE RD 4702 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220067 THOMAS & CATHERINE GUMP 4703 SUNNYSIDE RD 4703 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220047 AHMAD KOUATLI 4704 SUNNYSIDE RD 4704 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824220068 DONNA HANBERY 4705 SUNNYSIDE RD 4705 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5.018.96 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $20.389.70 1802824220048 MICHAEL & LISA WITTMER 4706 SUNNYSIDE RD 4706 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471. $15 370.74 1802824220069 SARAH & JAMES FOSTER 4707 SUNNYSIDE RD 4707 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15370.74 1802824220049 KATHERINE & MARTIN BASSETT 4800 SUNNYSIDE RD 4800 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220070 PETER PIERCE 4801 SUNNYSIDE RD 4801 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220050 BRENT & LISA MELLUM 4802 SUNNYSIDE RD 4802 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220051 SUSAN WOOD & PATRICK BURROWS 4804 ISUNNYSIDE RD 643 SAINT CLAIRE DR PALO ALTO CA 94306 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220071 JEFFREY RYAN 4805 SUNNYSIDE RD 4805 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.74 1802824220052 MATTHEW BOGART 4806 SUNNYSIDE RD 4806 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,35.74 1802824220072 JON C & ANA MARIA LEE 4807 SUNNYSIDE RD 4807 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220053 FRANK ROFFERS 4900 SUNNYSIDE RD 4900 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824220073 LEONARD NELSON 4901 SUNNYSIDE RD 4901 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824220054 JOAN & THOMAS JASPERSEN 4902 SUNNYSIDE RD 4902 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220074 KEVIN GREEN 4903 SUNNYSIDE RD 4903 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220055 ROBERT & SALLY LUND 4904 SUNNYSIDE RD 4904 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13.471.36 $15.370.74 1802824220075 RICHARD HOLETZ 4905 SUNNYSIDE RD 4905 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.G 6 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20.389.70. 1802824220076 ROBERT & CHRISTINA A WORRALL 4907 SUNNYSIDE RD 4907 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.741 1802824220056 ARTHUR & JOSEPHINE BROWN 4908 SUNNYSIDE RD 4908 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.9i $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.701 1802824220077 BRETT MALINSKI 4909 SUNNYSIDE RD 4909 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20 389.70 1802824220078 THOMAS & DAWNE DOUGHERTY 4911 SUNNYSIDE RD 4911 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.741 1802824220057 M SUSAN & LAWRENCE SECKINGER 4912 SUNNYSIDE RD 4912 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824220058 STEVEN & AMY SCHMITZ 4916 SUNNYSIDE RD 4916 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $5.018.96 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $20389.70 1802824220059 MARJORIE HANE 4920 SUNNYSIDE RD 4920 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.3 $13 471.36 $15370.74 1802824210088 JULIE CHURCHILL & JOHN POTTER 1 4500 IWOODDALE AVE 4500 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 ' $13,471.36 $15370.74 1802824210089 WILLIAM C VAN DYKE 4501 WOODDALE AVE 4501 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210087 ROBERT OLSEN 4502 WOODDALE AVE 4502 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210090 JANE & BRIAN LAVIN 4503 WOODDALE AVE 4503 WOODDALE AVE JEDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15370.74 1802824210088 1 SARA & JOHN BOSS I 4504 RAMODDALEAVE 14504 WOODDALE AVE JEDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT NO. A -214, L-49 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taypayers Mailing Address 1 -City, State Zip Sanitary Sewer Street Lighting Streets /Sidewalks Estimated Total Assessment Rate per Lot 1802824210091 RICHARD & SUSAN JOHNSON 4505 WOODDALE AVE 4505 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210085 LYNN & MICHAEL WAGNER 4506 WOODDALE AVE 4506 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210092 LAURIE & PETER NORDQUIST 4507 WOODDALE AVE 4507 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 13.471.361 $15,370.74 1802824210084 IMAUREEN & MICHAEL BRENER 4506 WOODDALE AVE 4508 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.7 0 1802824210093 WILLIAM & JAYNE EMORY 4509 WOODDALE AVE 4509 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370. 74 1802824210083 SHARON & ROBERT HEIBERG 4510 WOODDALE AVE 4510 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210094 SCOTT HONOUR 4511 WOODDALE AVE 1466 BIENVENEDA AVE PACIFIC PALISADES CA $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $20,389.70 1802824210082 KENNETH FEINBERG 4512 WOODDALE AVE 4512 WOODDALEAVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13471.36 $15370.74 1802824210095 SHERYL & JOHN KARLSON 4513 WOODDALE AVE 4513 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210081 SUSAN & MICHAEL BURNETT 4514 WOODDALE AVE 4514 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1,899.381 13 471.36 15 370.74 1802824210096 BRADLEY & AMY MCNAMARA 4515 WOODDALE AVE 4515 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1.899.381 13 471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210080 STEVEN & ANN BURBIDGE 4516 WOODDALE AVE 4516 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13.471.36 $15,370.74 1802624210097 PATRICK MCGINNIS 4517 WOODDALE AVE 4517 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.L6 $15,370.74 1802824210079 VIRGINIA LUPO 4518 WOODDALE AVE 4518 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1899.38 13 471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210098 THOMAS LINK 4519 WOODDALE AVE 4519 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1899.38 $13471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210099 JAMES & SHANNON RUSK 4521 WOODDALE AVE 4521 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $5 018.96 1 899.38 $13 471.36 $20,389.70 1802824210100 GAIL & DAVID TERWILLIGER 4523 WOODDALE AVE 4523 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824210106 BARBARA & KEITH WOLF 4600 WOODDALE AVE 4600 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $15 370.74 1802824210101 1802824210105 . DONALD MARSHALL MARK PALMER 4601 4602 WOODDALE AVE WOODDALE AVE 4601 WOODDALE AVE 4602 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1.899.38 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $13,471.36 $15.370.74 $15,370.74 1802824210102 1802824240029 EDMUND C GRAHAM III GARY EIDSON 4603 4604 WOODDALE AVE WOODDALE AVE 4603 WOODDALE AVE 4604 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1,89938 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $13,471.L6 $15,370. $15,370.74 1802824240002 1802824240028 ROSCOE C WEBB JR COLIN DOUGHERTY 4605 4606 WOODDALE AVE WOODDALE AVE 177 N SALTERAVE 4606 WOODDALE AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90049 EDINA MN 55424 $5,018.96 $1,899.38 $1.899.38 $13,471.36 $13, 471.36 $20,389.70 $15,370.74 1802824240003 RENEE & MICHAEL H CARREL 4607 WOODDALE AVE 4607 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.3i $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1602824240027 MARC & ETHEL BOGURSKY 4608 WOODDALE AVE 4608 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.74 1802824240004 MARK & SHERYL SCHROEDER 4609 WOODDALE AVE 4609 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802624240026 PATRICIA & GREGORY HOYT 4610 WOODDALE AVE 4610 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $15 370.74 1602824240005 GINNIFER Y & DONALD G GRIFFIN 4611 WOODDALE AVE 4611 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240025 1802824240006 SUSAN LATTA & ROBERT LATTA JR REBECCA & MARK ODLAND 4612 4613 W05DDALE AVE WOODDALE AVE 4612 WOODDALE AVE 4613 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.36 $1 899.38 $13 471.36 $13,471.38 $15,370.74 $15,370.74 1802824240024 SUNNY & JUNG LEE KIM 4614 WOODDALE AVE 2592 CNTY RD 120 NE ALEXANDRIA MN 56308 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802624240007 SCOTT & MARGARET BUSYN 4615 WOODDALE AVE 4615 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15.370.74 1802824240023 DEREK & KARLA PITT 4618 WOODDALE AVE 4616 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802624240008 RONALD J & KATHRYN PETERSON 4617 WOODDALE AVE 4617 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240009 DANIEL J GARDNER 4619 WOODDALE AVE 4619 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1,899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240010 MICHAEL & MAUREEN BRENER 4621 WOODDALE AVE 4621 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1899.38 $13471.36 $15370.74 1802824240011 JEFFREY RUEHL 4623 WOODDALE AVE 4623 WOODDALE AVE IEDINA MN 55424 1 899.38 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 1802824240022 1802824240012 MICHAEL FITZGERALD JASON B NASBY 4624 4625 WOODDALE AVE WOODDALE AVE 14625 4624 WOODDALE AVE WOODDALE AVE JEDINA EDINA MN 55424 MN 55424 $1 899.38 $1,899.381 $13,471.36 $13,471.36 $15,370.74 $15,370.74 TOTALS I I I $125,474.00 $440,656.18 $3,125,355.52 $3,891,485.68 Page 5 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 13, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. A -214 & L -49 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 13th day of September, 2010. 0 vhf Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Edina Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 5, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider and possibly adopt a proposed special assessment and to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to the proposed special assessment for the following improvement: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A -214: EDINA COUNTRY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION The area proposed to be assessed for the project is the Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $3,691,485.68. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Sanitary Sewer Line: $ Street Lighting: $ Streets & Sidewalk: $ Total Assessment: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT OPTIONS The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years at the rate of 5.75 %. Following the assessment hearing, and City Council formal adoption of the assessment roll, you may pay the assessment as follow: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. 2. Pay a minimum of 25% of the assessment by November 30, 2010 (authorized by ordinance). Your remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 3. If not paid by November 30, 2010, the assessment will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 4. Deferral on homesteads owned by persons 65 years of age or older: Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 MAKING YOUR PAYMENT 1. Make your check payable to the City of Edina and return by mail to the City of Edina, Assessing Department, 4801 W. 50"' Street, Edina, MN 55424, with your statement; or 2. Make payment in person in the Assessing Department, City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 13, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk &14A'1r. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT e i�� STATEMENT i City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0365 THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL — PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: TAXPAYER (S): YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 5. 2010 Total Assessment: $15,370.74 Interest Rate: 5.75% Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Remaining Principal 2010 $ 220.95 1 2011 $ 1,537.07 $ 883.82 $ 2,641.85 $ 13,833.67 2 2012 $ 1,537.07 $ 795.44 $ 2,332.51 $ 12,296.59 3 2013 $ 1,537.07 $ 707.05 $ 2,244.13 $ 10,759.52 4 2014 $ 1,537.07 $ 618.67 $ 2,155.75 $ 9,222.44 5 2015 $ 1,537.07 $ 530.29 $ 2,067.36 $ 7,685.37 6 2016 $ 1,537.07 $ 441.91 $ 1,978.98 $ 6,148.30 7 2017 $ 1,537.07 $ 353.53 $ 1,890.60 $ 4,611.22 8 2018 $ 1,537.07 $ 265.15 $ 1,802.22 $ 3,074.15 9 2019 $ 1,537.07 $ 176.76 $ 1,713.84 $ 1,537.07 10 2020 $ 1,537.07 $ 88.38 $ . 1,625.46 $ (0.00) $ 15,370.74 $ 5,081.95 $ 20,452.69 Easy Peel@ Labels Use Avery® Template 5160 1802824220040 ' BARRY & CHRISTY ZILKA 4400 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824220062 WILLIAM JARRETT, JR 4500 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210035 SCHELE & PHILIP I SMITH 4503 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824220093 CYNTHIA & KEVIN BINGHAM 4506 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210039 WILLIAM & NANCY HORN 4511 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 i 1802824220079 ALLYSON & TODD ALDRICH 4518 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240074 JESSICA ANN PERRY SLOSSER 4602 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240047 STEVEN & KRISTIN VEKER 4605 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240076 MARC & KREEA ASHTON 4610 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 802824240052 KEVIN HYKES 4615 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 Bend along line to Feed Paper expose Pop- EdgeTM 1 1802824220041 JOHN C WALDEN 4402 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210034 DOUGLAS EDEN 4501 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824220060 KEITH WOODWARD 4504 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210037 FRANK & JANET LEDERLE 4507 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210040 DAVID PEARSON 4513 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824230055 MARY & ALAN HOGG 4520 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240046 MARK & LAURA JORDAHL 4603 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240048 JOAN & JOSEPH CRONIN 4607 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240050 SHELDON & TERRY FLECK 4611 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240086 CHARLES S ANDERSON & LAURIE G DEMARTINO 4616 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 aAVERY(R) 5960T" CChu ('--) - 1802824210016 DANA ALPETER 4405 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824220061 ROBERT DE BREY 4502 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210036 JOANNE & JOHN GORDON 4505 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210038 REBECCA & STEPHEN BRIGGS 4509 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210041 ANN & BRUCE CHRISTENSEN 4515 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210109 JODI CHU 4601 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240075 VIRGINA K LINDOW 4604 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240049 REBECCA & PAUL WALSER 4609 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240051 JANE & CLIFFORD TANEY 4613 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240053 GARY & ROISIN LASKIN 4617 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 klquettes faciles a peler ; A Repliez A la hachure aiin de ; vmw avery corn ■ 24411 .._ 1......�..,.e� AwenvO c -ven® 1 . Sens de rAwAlar 1a sherd Poo•UoTM ! 1- 800-GO -AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to 1 Q AVERVO 5960TH Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824240054 KENNETH T EVERSON 4619 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240056 KURTIS J WINTERS & CHRISTINE KASSAB 4623 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 _ 1802824240087 DAVID J & LISA BOSS 4620 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240088 CLAIRE & JACK DEMPSEY 4624 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240055 MILAGROS & VINCENTE QUIMBO 4621 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240057 JOHN W THIEL 4625 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240058 1802824240089 1802824240059 MICHELE & JONATHAN EISELE WILLIAM R & LISA MARIE QUIRK MADONNA CLARK 4627 BROWNDALE AVE 4628 BROWNDALE AVE 4629 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240090 1802824240073 1802824240091 SUNG -JIN J & CARRIE J CHANG FRANK LUSHINE JANE B JACOBS 4632 BROWNDALE AVE 4600 BROWNDALE AVE 4901 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240093 DOUGLAS NELSON 4905 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240099 WILLIAM ELLIOTT 4305 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240102 MICHAEL & ANNE HALL 4405 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240104 JOSEPH & SUZANNE SULLIVAN 4409 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824230057 MARY & THEODORE ADAMS 4618 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 1802824240082 CHAD H KELLY 4630 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 ittiquett s; faciles 3 peler ■ 96712- 1- wveov0 C9cn(ID 1802824240092 FAITH MAGNUSON 4909 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240100 SUSAN BENNETT 4401 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240103 LOUISE PRICE 4407 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240098 KEITH & KATHRYN PETERSON 4303 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240101 ALEXANDER WARE 4403 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240060 GORDON B ASSELSTINE 4408 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240077 1802824230056 LAURENCE SMITH DONALD HULLSTRAND 4612 EDGEBROOK PL 4614 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824230058 1802824240081 NORMAN & MARY BETH CHAPEL MICHAEL BINGHAM 4622 EDGEBROOK PL 4626 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240083 MARK & GRETCHEN BANKS 4634 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de r5vifiler le rebord Pon -UuTm I 1802824240084 PAUL & SUZANNE CROWE 4638 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 www.avery.com 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ . Bend along line to Use Avery@ Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTm j 1802824240085 1802824210068 CONSTANCE & WILLIAM ELINOR LUCAS HADDELAND 4500 EDINA BLVD 4640 EDGEBROOK PL EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 4512 EDINA BLVD 1802824210067 1802824210070 TIMOTHY W ZOSEL STUART & MARY HARVEY 4502 EDINA BLVD 4503 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210071 1802824210065 KATHERINE S & ANDREW J MARIE & RICHARD THORPE ENGEL 4506 EDINA BLVD 4505 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210064 1802824210073 j STEVEN B WELO JILL TRAUTZ 1 4508 EDINA BLVD 4509 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210074 1802824210062 STEVEN SWAIN ELSIE & A RICHARD WEILER 4511 EDINA BLVD 4512 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210061 1802824210076 DWIGHT & CYNTHIA HAGER PETER & LAURA GIDEON 4514 EDINA BLVD 4515 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210077 1802824210078 MARY LYNN & WARREN STALEY JAMES & JULIE WOHLFORD 4517 EDINA BLVD ­4519 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240045 WILLIAM C ALLDREDGE 4602 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240013 BRENDA & KENNETH DELECKI j 4605 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 802824240042 JAMES HICKEY JR & TRAEY HICKEY 4608 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1 tiquettes fadles A peler 1802824210104 MARK W,GREINER 4603 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240043 THOMAS & DIANE ERICKSON 4606 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240015 LEANNE & STEPHEN PONTIUS 4609 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 Repliez 3 la hachure afin de Sens de .a,.sier fa rohnni Pin -unTM ! QAVERY@ 5960" 1802824210069 DONNA DUDLEY 4501 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210066 SARA & BRIAN ASLESEN 4504 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210072 ROBERT RAMSAY 4507 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210063 E W.MACLENNAN 4510 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210075 DANIEL DAY 4513 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210060 GREGORY & PATRICIA SALMI 4516 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210103 KURT & ELLEN DAHLQUIST 4601 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240044 LAURIE & WILLIAM - MACLEAN 4604 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240014 JANE & GARY TYGESSON 4607 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240041 PATRICIA DILL 4610 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 www.avery.com 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Use Avery@ Template 51600 i feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge- j 1802824240016 1802824240040 LOREN & KATHLEEN VORLICKY FREDERICK W WEBB JR 4611 EDINA BLVD 4612 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240039 1802824240018 DEREK & PATRICIA MALMQUIST JENNIFER & EDWARD COLLINS 4614 EDINA BLVD 4615 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 s 1802824240020 FRANK L WHEELER i4619 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 i 1802824210050 CHARLES TURNER ' 4500 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210052 MARGARET SHIDEMAN 4503 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210047 JEFFREY & SHANNON AWSUMB 4506 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210055 RICHARD STURGEON 4509 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210044 CARY HUMPHRIES 4512 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210058 ANDREW WEISS & AMY KAISER 4515 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210107 ELIZABETH & DANIEL R MAYLEBEN 4601 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 ittiquettes faciles A peler ■ ■ 211 -__ 1_ ASSITM Bi even® 1802824240021 JAMES & BETSY ANDERSON 4621 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 QAVERY@ 5960TM 1802824240017 JULIE & DOUGLAS BAKER 4613 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824240019 JAMES & MIRIAM STAKE 4617 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210108 SUZANNE & DANIEL ILTEN 4800 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210051 1802824210049 VIRGINIA & MICHAEL MAHONEY JEAN & ROBERT KENNEDY 4501 MOORLAND AVE 4502 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210048 SUSAN S THATCHER 4504 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210054 DAVID & KATHLEEN MACLENNAN 4507 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210045 MARTIN & PATRICIA MCKINLEY 4510 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210057 LINDA A DUPERE 4513 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210042 JULIE & RICHARD ARMBRUST 4516 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240071 HAROLD & MARGARET HOPPMANN 4602 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 Sens de Repliez A la hachure afin de . rbvblar In rebord Poo -UDTm ! 1802824210053 JANE & ROBERT OBERRENDER 4505 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210046 LISA & JOHN SOLBERG 4508 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210056 WILLIAM MELTON 4511 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210043 THOMAS COLLINS 4514 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824210059 MARYANN PARKER 4517 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240030 JONATHAN CLEVELAND 4603 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 www.averycom 1- 800-GO -AVERY EaSy Peel@ Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i o AAMRYO 5960= Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper ��' expose Pop-Up Edge'rm A' 1802824240031 1802824240069 MICHAEL MADISON PAUL & MARY THIBEAU ANDREW & NELLIE BAUER 4604 MOORLAND AVE 4605 MOORLAND AVE 4606 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1 1802824240032 1802824240068 1802824240033 JULIE SUNDBERG & C D WILLIAM D & CINDY J SMITH MICHAEL D & HEIDI JO OLEARY 4607 MOORLAND AVE 4608 MOORLAND AVE NORMAN 4609 MOORLAND AVE i EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240067 1802824240034 1802824240066 RHONDA & RORY O'NEILL MURAD S & JANE VELANI RUSSELL & NANDY PETRELLA 4610 MOORLAND AVE 4611 MOORLAND AVE 4612 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240064 1802824240065 1802824240035 JON REISNER & ANN TERESA TYLER L NASIEDLAK ELIZABETH & CHARLES MOOTY FERREIRA 4614 MOORLAND AVE 4615 MOORLAND AVE 4616 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240105 1802824240036 1802824240063 LEE U & BONNIE SPEER SCOTT GAGE BRUCE BARCLAY MCGRATH 4617 MOORLAND AVE 4618 MOORLAND AVE 4619 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240062 1802824240061 1802824210110 MARILYN B BORDEWICK ANDREW WALSER FREDERICK RICHARDS it 4620 MOORLAND AVE 4622 MOORLAND AVE 4800 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210031 1802824210030 1802824210029 CLAUDIA & PAUL CARR JAY & LEAH LINDGREN JAMES & ANITA HIDDING 4300 SUNNYSIDE RD 4302 SUNNYSIDE RD 4304 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210028 1802824210027 1802824210026 HILORY & DOUGLAS SEATON JEFFREY & LAURA PECK PETER & SHEILA LIND 4306 SUNNYSIDE RD 4400 SUNNYSIDE RD 4402 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210025 1802824210024 1802824210023 PEETER & PATRICIA KIVESTU DIANE & DONAL MULLIGAN KARRI & MARK COPMAN 4404 SUNNYSIDE RD 4406 SUNNYSIDE RD 4408 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210020 802824210022 1802824210021 EDWARD & ELIZABETH EROL UKE & KARIN TANSEK PAUL & BETSY VON KUSTER CUSSLER 4410 SUNNYSIDE RD 4500 SUNNYSIDE RD 14502 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 lWquettes faciles 3 peter ; A Repliez A la hachure afln de ; www.avery.com ■ 16311— r.. A.iC0v®c4en® i , Sens de rAvAInr In rebord Poo -UoTM ! 1- 800-GO -AVERY Easy Peel(D Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i AAMRY(D 5960"m Use Avery© Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1802824210019 KAREN KELLY 4504 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220042 LISA & F CLAYTON MILLER 4600 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220064 ROBERT BARRIE & KRIS WONG 4603 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210018 BRIAN & SUSAN PETERSEN 4506 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220063 CYNTHIA & STEPHEN SNYDER 4601 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220065 CHRISTOPHER & SUSAN JOHNSON 4605 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824210017 KEITH & MARILYN WEST 4510 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220043 RICHARD A & KATHRYN V ROEDEL 4602 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220044 WILLIAM & BARBARA BEARD 4606 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220045 1802824220066 1802824220046 JANICE & CHARLES BUTH JOSHUA & THERESA WALDMAN ROBERT & PATRICIA DILLON 4700 SUNNYSIDE RD 4701 SUNNYSIDE RD 4702 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824220067 1802824220047 1802824220068 THOMAS & CATHERINE GUMP AHMAD KOUATLI DONNA HANBERY 4703 SUNNYSIDE RD 4704 SUNNYSIDE RD 4705 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 ' 1802824220048 MICHAEL & LISA WITTMER 4706 SUNNYSIDE RD i EDINA MN 55424 1802824220070 PETER PIERCE 4801 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA, MN 55424 1802824220071 JEFFREY RYAN 4805 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220053 FRANK ROFFERS 4900 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220074 KEVIN GREEN 4903 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220069 SARAH & JAMES FOSTER 4707 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220050 BRENT & LISA MELLUM 4802 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220052 MATTHEW BOGART 4806 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220073 LEONARD NELSON 4901 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220055 ROBERT & SALLY LUND 4904 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220049 KATHERINE & MARTIN BASSETT 4800 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220051 SUSAN WOOD & PATRICK BURROWS 643 SAINT CLAIRE DR PALO ALTO, CA 94306 1802824220072 JON C & ANA MARIA LEE 4807 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220054 JOAN & THOMAS JASPERSEN 4902 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1802824220075 RICHARD HOLETZ 4905 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 ittiquettes fables 3 peler ; A Repliez 6 la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com i itmcwy ie n =h =pit avFRv@ Sinn I '.Sens de -; rEv6ler le rebord Pop -UpTm ; 1-800-GO-AVERY tasy reel— r aoeis i Use Avery® Template 5160® Bona along une to I Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge j 1S AVERYQP 5961 V 1802824220076 ROBERT & CHRISTINA A 1802824220056 1802824220077 WORRALL ARTHUR & JOSEPHINE BROWN BRETT MALINSKI 4907 SUNNYSIDE RD 4908 SUNNYSIDE RD 4909 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824220078 1802824220057 THOMAS & DAWNE M SUSAN & LAWRENCE STEVEN &AMY SCHMITZ STEVEN & AM8 DOUGHERTY � SECKINGER 4916 SUNNYSIDE RD 4911 SUNNYSIDE RD 4912 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824220059 1802824210088 1802824210089 • MARJORIE HANE JULIE CHURCHILL &JOHN WILLIAM C VAN DYKE 4920 SUNNYSIDE RD POTTER 4501 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 4500 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210087 1802824210090 1802824210086 ROBERT OLSEN JANE & BRIAN LAVIN SARA & JOHN BOSS 4502 WOODDALE AVE 4503 WOODDALE AVE 4504 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 i EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 I 1802824210091 • 1802824210085 1802824210092 RICHARD & SUSAN JOHNSON LYNN & MICHAEL WAGNER LAURIE & PETER NORDQUIST j 4505 WOODDALE AVE 4506 WOODDALE AVE 4507 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210084 1802824210093 1802824210083 MAUREEN & MICHAEL BRENER WILLIAM & JAYNE EMORY SHARON & ROBERT HEIBERG 4508 WOODDALE AVE 4509 WOODDALE AVE 4510 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA, MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210094 1802824210082 1802824210095 SCOTT HONOUR KENNETH FEINBERG SHERYL & JOHN KARLSON 1466 BIENVENEDA AVE 4512 WOODDALE AVE 4513 WOODDALE AVE PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210081 1802824210096 1802824210080 SUSAN & MICHAEL BURNETT BRADLEY & AMY MCNAMARA STEVEN & ANN BURBIDGE 4514 WOODDALE AVE 4515 WOODDALE AVE 4516 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210097 1802824210079 1802824210098 PATRICK MCGINNIS VIRGINIA LUPO THOMAS LINK 4517 WOODDALE AVE 4518 WOODDALE AVE 4519 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824210099 1802824210100 1802824210101 AMES & SHANNON RUSK GAIL & DAVID TERWILLIGER DONALD MARSHALL 4521 WOODDALE AVE 4523 WOODDALE AVE 4601 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 Ictiquettes fadles a peler ; A Repliez a la hachure afln de ; www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 i charaement r6v6ler le rebord Pop -UpTm i 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Use Avery@ Template 51600 Feed Paper � expose Pop-Up EdgeTM i U 1802824210105 MARK PALMER 4602 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240002 ROSCOE C WEBB JR 177 N SALTER AVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 1802824240027 MARC & ETHEL BOGURSKY i 4608 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240005 GINNIFER Y & DONALD G GRIFFIN 4611 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240024 SUNNY & JUNG LEE KIM 2592 CNTY RD 120 NE ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 1802824240008 RONALD J & KATHRYN PETERSON 4617 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240011 JEFFREY RUEHL 4623 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 ' 1802824210106 BARBARA & KEITH WOLF 4600 WOODDALE AVE ' EDINA MN 55424 1802824210102 EDMUND C GRAHAM III 4603. WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240028 COLIN DOUGHERTY 4606 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240004 MARK & SHERYL SCHROEDER 4609 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240029 GARY EIDSON 4604 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240003 RENEE & MICHAEL H CARREL 4607 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240026 PATRICIA & GREGORY HOYT 4610 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240025 1802824240006 SUSAN LATTA & ROBERT LATTA ; REBECCA & MARK ODLAND JR 4613 WOODDALE AVE 4612 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824240007 SCOTT & MARGARET BUSYN 4615 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240009 DANIEL J GARDNER 4619 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240022 MICHAEL FITZGERALD 4624 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240023 DEREK & KARLA PITT 4616 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240010 MICHAEL & MAUREEN BRENER 4621 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824240012 JASON B NASBY 4625 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424 ttiquettes fables 3 peler i A Repliez 6 la hachure afin d w e ; ww avery com ; Utilisez le gabarlt AVERY® 5160® 11 Sens de r�v�ler le rebord Po U *M j 1- 800 -60-AVERY i 1 chargement p" p CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: MICS EXPENSES PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: PROJECT FINANCE COST: TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: ASSESSABLE UNITS: ASSESSABLE COST LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: Roadway Improvements: BA-356 Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Improvements Valley Paving Actual $ 318,588.43 $ 53,159.30 $ 371,747.73 $ 500.00 $ 17,447.57 Proposed (Pending) $ 389,695.30 $ 600,000.00 64 $ .6,088.99 $ 9,375.16 TOTAL $ 389,695.30 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT = $ 9,375.16 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT = $ 6,088.99 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST $ 6,088.99 10 YEARS a B 10 11 12 13 14 16 to 17 16 1s 2� 22 23 24 2. 2E 27 2E 2E 3C 31 3: 32 3' 3f 3i 4: 4; 41 41 4( 4i 4f 41 6f 5' 5: 5: b 6; 51 6 CB 51 81 e' 8: 8: 6 FINAL ASSE.& ENT ROLL MIRROR LAKES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-356 STREET PID i LOT BLOCK STREET NO. OWNER MAILING STREET ADDRESS Cfi17STATE MP ASSESSABLE REU TOTAL REU ASSESSMENT COST Chantray Road 3211721210067 20 0 5500 Jay and Use Famam Chanbey Road Etllna, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.98 3211721120058 1 0 5501 Mail= and David Lindholm Chanbey Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210066 1B 0 5504 D. K and D. B. Follestatl Chaney Road Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8 088.BB 3211721120080 2 0 5505 Susan Berdley Chanhey Road Edina, MN 55435 1.00 1.00 8,088.89 3211721210005 18 0 5508 Paul Pawaff ChanUey Road Edina MN 55438 1000 1.00 8,088.19 3211721120081 3 0 5509 Michael J. Kelley Chantray Road Edina. MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,08B.99 3211721210064 17 0 5512 Etlhnard H. Sminnen Ch.nUy Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.98 3211721120082 4 0 6513 Bruce Hiller Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210063 18 0 5516 Came Levin Freeman Chantrey Road Edina MN 55436 1000 1.00 6,088.99 3211721120063 5 0 5517 Scott Retch Ch. Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 BABOON 3211721210062 16 0 5520 Steven Culbert Chantrey Road Edina MN 65438 1.00 1.00 8,088.09 3211721120064 8 0 5521 Gary E. Sterility Charibey Road Edina MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.89 3211721210061 14 0 5524 David and Janet Nelson Ghantrey Road Edina MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721120065 7 0 6525 L Cad Starkh C Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.98 3211721210060 13 0 5528 Phyllis A T. Carlson C Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.88 3211721120066 8 0 5529 Karen Lorence Chan Road E ?na MN 55436 1.00 1000 6,088.99 3211721210059 12 0 5532 C. Essma Chan Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.98 3211721120067 B 0 6533 James R Baker C Road Etlina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 0,088.9B 3211721210050 11 0 SSW Bern Stepnas Ctanhey Road Etllna, MN 55430 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721120088 10 0 5537 Warren PuelSton Chaney Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.88 Dundee Road 3211721210011 1 1 5405 Eric and Shell Leill Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.09 3211721210013 1 2 5501 Paul Kama Duntlee Road Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.89 3211721210014 2 2 6505 John Braze] Dundee Road Etllna, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210015 3 2 5509 Shannon and John PMSVW Dundee Road Edna, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721210016 4 2 5513 Mary OTouie Dundee Road Etlina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721210017 5 2 5517 Mark and Julie Kerekes Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210018 1 3 5404 Ronald antl Judith Vessey Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210018 2 3 5408 Richard Westin Dundee Road Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.09 3211721210020 3 3 5500 Elise and Thomas Lasdlks Dundee Road Edina. MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.98 3211721210021 4 3 5504 Robert Jr. and Heather Rykhua Dundee Road Edina. MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,068.99' 3211721210022 5 3 5508 Herbert C. French Dundee Road Edina, MN 65436 1.00 1.00 8,088.98 3211721210023 6 3 5512 Tract Eniv Dundee Road Etlina MN 59436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 1 3211721210024 1 1 5521 Bruce Armsbon Dundee Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.89 3211721210025 2 1 657.5 James antl Camille Malone Dundee Road Edina. MN 65436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210028 3 1 5528 Kevin and Colleen Raasch Dundee Road Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.90 1 3211721210027 4 1 5533 Geo la Keiser and Kelly Tdtz Dundee Road Edina, MN 65436 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721210028 5 1 5537 Wiifiam and Annals Dallman Dundee Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.89 1 3211721210032 1 2 5518 David Olson and Judith Dugan Olson Dundee Road Edina MN 65436 1.00 1.00 B4OBB.BB 3211721210033 2 2 5520 Thomas and Janl® Levereniv Dundee Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.89 I 3211721210034 3 2 5528 Judith and Marshall Schwartz Dundee Road Edina MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721210035 4 2 5532 Scott G. Peterson Dundee Road Edina, MN 65435 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 3211721280056 7 2 5540 Sylvia Logequlst and Dorothy Mcla" Dundee Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.89 1 3211721240057 8 2 6800 Dale and Cynthia Saltier Dundee Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 V 3211721240058 9 2 5804 Daniel Rne Dundee Road Edina MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.89 i Mirror Lakes Drthre 3211721210029 e 1 5536 Robert D. Grenclulsl Minor Lakes Drive Edina, MN 65436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 I 3211721210030 7 1 5532 Dad. L EUertson Mirror Lakes Drive Edina MN 55438 1.00 20 6,068.98 3211721210031 8 1 5528 Douglas A Mftla Mirror lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 I 3211721210040 1 1 5501 BMW Miller Minor Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.88 1 3211721210041 2 1 5505 Tinnothy 6 Piper Webb Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 8,088.89 I 3211721210092 3 1 6508 Tarty and Ellrahalh Br01 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210043 4 1 5513 William R Huston Mirror lakes Drive EdlMa, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210044 5 1 5517 Terry L Snover M'mor Lakes Drive Edina MN 55435 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 1 3211721210045 6 1 5521 John Owing and Susan Sena Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 1 3211721210048 7 1 5525 Sunny and Jung Klm 2592 Co. Rd 120 NE Alelandda, MN 56308 1.00 1.00 6,088.09 3211721210047 B 1 5528 Donald R. Klzershot Wumr Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 1 3211721210048 9 1 5533 David and Karen Wks Minor lakes Drive Edina MN 5MW 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210:049 '10 1 5537 David Johnson Mirror Lakes Drive Edina MN 554W 1.00 1.00 8,088.99 I 32117212150 11 7 5541 David and Nerlrry Gustafson Mirror lakes DMe Edina, MN 56438 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 I 3211721210051 1 2 5500 Todd and Barbara Nieland Mirror Lakes Ddve Etllna, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 1 3211721210052 2 1 2 1 5504 Bradley and Mary Sherman NBnor lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 3211721210063 3 2 5512 Mark and Barbara Maness Mirror Lakes Ddve Edina, MN 55436 1.00 1.00 s 088.99 t 3211727210054 4 2 5516 Matthew R Schrag Mrtor lakes Drive Etllna, MN 55438 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 I 3211727270055 5 2 5520 Sun andJunliKinn 2592 Co. Rd 120 NE Alerandrla MN 58308 1.00 1.00 6,088.99 l 3211721210058 8 2 5524 Fretlerlck and Wan Mortis Mirror Lakes Drive Etllna MN 55436 1.00 1 1.00 6,088.99 64A0 64.00 389,89530 FINAL TOTAL ROADWAY COST $389,695.30 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REU 64.00 AVERAG' 'T PER REU $8,088.99 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 13, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached. Notice of Public Hearing for Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -356 (Exhibit A), enclosed 'in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 21 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this �`i'� day of , 20 l0 I�l' ii; . P 0 1 P MO.' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Edina Notice is hereby given-that the Edina City Council will meet at City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 5, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider and possibly adopt a proposed special assessment and ,to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to the proposed special assessment for the following improvement: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA: 356: MIRROR LAKES NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION The area proposed to be assessed for the project is the Mirror Lakes Neighborhood Reconstruction. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $389,695.30. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Amount: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT OPTIONS The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years at the rate of 5.75 %. Following the assessment hearing, and City Council formal adoption of tl- assessment roll, you may pay the assessment as follow: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. 2. Pay a minimum of 25% of the assessment by November 30, 2010 (authorized by ordinance). Your remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 3. If not paid by November 30, 2010, the assessment will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 4. Deferral on homesteads owned by persons 65 years of ape or older: Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for Whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the'Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. MAKING YOUR PAYMENT 1. Make your check payable to the City of Edina and return by mail to the City of Edina, Assessing Department, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, with your statement; or 2. Make payment in person in the Assessing Department, City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 13, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk ,pea City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952- 826 -0365 o .t PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STATEMENT THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL - PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: ( � TAXPAYER (S): YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 5, 2010 Total Assessment: $6,088.99 Interest Rate: 5.75% Remaining Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Principal 2010 $ 87.53 1 2011 $ 608.90 $ 350.12 $ 1,046.55 $ 5,480.09 2 2012 $ . 608.90 $ 315.11 $ 924.00 $ 4,871.19 3 2013 $ 608.90 $ 280.09 $ 888.99 $ 4,262.29 4 2014 $ 608.90 $ 245.08 $ 853.98 $ 3,653.39 5 2015 $ 608.90 $ 210.07 $ 818.97 $ 3,044.50 6 2016 $ 608.90 $ 175.06 $ 783.96 $ 2,435.60 7 2017 $ 608.90 $ 140.05 $ 748.95 $ 1,826.70 8 2018 $ 608.90 $ 105.04 $ 713.93 $ 1,217.80 9 2019 $ 608.90 $ 70.02 $ 678.92 $ 608.90 10 2020 $ 608.90 $ 35.01 $ 643.91 $ - $ 6,088.99 $ 2,013.17 $ 8,102.16 Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Po Edge 3211721210067 3211721120059 Jay and Lisa Farnam Melissa and David Lindholm 5500 Chantrey Road 5501 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721120060 3211721210065 Susan Bentley i Paul Patzloff 5505 Chantrey Road 5508 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210064 3211721120062 Edward H. Swetman Bruce Hiller 5512 Chantrey Road 5513 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721120063 3211721210062 Scott Reich Steven Culbert 5517 Chantrey Road 5520 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210061 3211721120065 David and Janet Nelson L Carl Starich 5524 Chantrey Road 5525 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721120066 3211721210059 Karen Lorence Amy C. Essma 5529 Chantrey Road 5532 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210058 3211721120068 Benjamin Stepnes j Warren Puelston 5536 Chantrey Road 5537 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 i Edina, MN 55436 j 3211721210013 3211721210014 Paul Karos John Brazel 5501 Dundee Road 5505 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210016 3211721210017 Mary W O'Toole Mark and Julie Kerekes 5513 Dundee Road 5517 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210019 3211721210020 'Richard Westin Elise and Thomas Laedtke 5408 Dundee Road 5500 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 I tiquettes fables A peter ; A Repliez 3 la hachure afin de ; Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 51600 I 'ti;ema ant rdvdler le rebord Pop -UpTm i AVERY® 5960Th 3211721210066 D. K. and D. B..Follestad 5504 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721120061 Michael J.,Kelley 5509 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721210063 Carrie Levin Freeman 5516 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721120064 Gary E. Stensby 5521 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721210060 Phyllis A. T. Carlson 5528 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721120067 James R. Baker 5533 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721210011 Eric and Sheryl Leill 5405 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721210015 Shannon and John Presthus 5509 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721210018 Ronald and Judith Vessey 5404 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721210021 Robert Jr. and Heather Rykhus 5504 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 www.avery.com 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Use Avery@ Template 5160® i Feed Paper � expose Pop-0p EdgeTM 3211721210022 3211721210023 3211721210024 Herbert C. French Traci Egly Bruce Armstrong 5508 Dundee Road 5512 Dundee Road 5521 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210025 3211721210026 3211721210027 James and Camille Malone Kevin and Colleen Raasch Georgia Kaiser and Kelly Tritz 5525 Dundee Road 5529 Dundee Road 5533 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210028 3211721210032 3211721210033 William and Angela Dallman David Olson and Judith Dugan Thomas and Janice Leverentz 5537 Dundee Road Olson 5520 Dundee Road i Edina, MN 55436 5516 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 j Edina, MN 55436 3211721210034 3211721210035 3211721240056 Judith and Marshall Schwartz Scott G. Peterson Sylvia Logerquist and Dorothy 5528 Dundee Road 5532 Dundee Road Mcintyre Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 5540 Dundee Road Edina, MN 55436 3211721240057 3211721240058 3211721210029 Dale and Cynthia Sattler Daniel Fine Robert D. Granquist 5600 Dundee Road 5604 Dundee Road 5536 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210030 3211721210031 3211721210040 Darin L. Eilertson Douglas A. Imholte Bruce Miller 5532 Mirror Lakes Drive 5528 Mirror Lakes Drive 5501 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210041 3211721210042 3211721210043 Timothy & Piper Webb Terry and Elizabeth Brill William R. Huston 5505 Mirror Lakes Drive 5509 Mirror Lakes Drive 5513 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210044 3211721210045 3211721210046 Terry L. Snover I John Doering and Susan Scott Sunny and Jung Kim 5517 Mirror Lakes Drive 5521 Mirror Lakes Drive 2592 Co. Rd 120 NE Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Alexandria, MN 56308 3211721210047 3211721210048 3211721210049 Donald R. Kizershot David and Karen Wilde David Johnson 5529 Mirror Lakes Drive 5533 Mirror Lakes Drive 5537 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 3211721210050 3211721210051 3211721210052 David and Nancy Gustafson Todd and Barbara Nieland Bradley and Mary Sherman 5541 Mirror Lakes Drive 5500 Mirror Lakes Drive 5504 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 9tiquettes faciles h peter ; A Repllez 3 la hachure afm de e^+ www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 ; 'hSens rEv6ler le rebord Pop -UpTM i 1-80"0-AVERY Use Avery© Template 51600 • 3211721210053 Mark and Barbara Moxness 5512 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 3211721210056 Frederick and Wendy Morris 5524 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 I 9tiquettes fadles a peter iFeed Paper � expose Pop-Up Edge- j 3211721210054 Matthew R. Schrag 5516 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 ' Sens de Repliez 3 la hachure afro de .-a..Af -1e nnk^,A 0^n I InTM 3211721210055 Sunny and Jung Kim 2592 Co. Rd 120 NE Alexandria, MN 56308 www.avery.com 1- 800-GO -AVERY a � V P 0 4C) PPOSED ASSESSMENT ow e� STATEMENT City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0365 THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL - PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: 3211721210016 TAXPAYER (S): Mary W O'Toole YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 5, 2010 Total Assessment: $6,088.99 Interest Rate: 5.75% 1 Remaining Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Principal 2010 $ 87.53 1 2011 $ 608.90 $ 350.12 $ 1,046.55 $ 5,480.09 2 2012 $ 608.90 $ 315.11 $ 924.00 $ 4,871.19 3 2013 $ 608.90 $ 280.09 $ 888.99 $ 4,262.29 4 2014 $ 608.90 $ 245.08 $ 853.98 $ 3,653.39 5 2015 $ 608.90 $ 210.07 $ 818.97 $ 3,044.50 6 2016 $ 608.90 $ 175.06 $ 783.96 $ 2,435.60 7 2017 $ 608.90 $ 140.05 $ 748.95 $ 1,826.70 8 2018 $ 608.90 $ 105.04 $ 713.93 $ 1,217.80 9 2019 $ 608.90 $ 70.02 $ 678.92 $ 608.90 10 2020 $ 608.90 $ 35.01 $ 643.91 $ - $ 6,088.99 $ 2,013.17 $ 8,102.16 1 FOR: LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: MICS EXPENSES PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: PROJECT FINANACE COST: CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT Roadway Improvements: BA-357 St. John's Neighborhood Improvements Actual Midwest Asphalt $ 850,156.10 $ 205,816.12 $ 1, 055, 972.22 $ 500.00 $ 49,046.99 Proposed (Pending) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 1,105,519.21 $1,793,350.00 ASSESSABLE UNITS: 170.67 $ 6,477.53 $ 9,300.00 TOTAL $ 1,105, 519.21 ASSESSABLE COST LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT = $ 9,300.00 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT = $ 6,477.53 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST $ 6,477.53 10 YEARS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ST. JOHN'S PARK NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -357 PID Taxpayers Name Street# Street Mailing Address CI St ZIP Estimated Total Assessment Rata REU 1902824310069 DOROTHY N SCOTT 5800 ASHCROFTAVE 5800ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 4,318.35 0.67 1902824310068 MOIRA& JOSHUA OLSON 5801 ASHCROFTAVE 5801 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 4,318.35 0.67 1902824310070 TIFFANY D FAHNHORST 5804 ASHCROFTAVE 4506 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310067 DAVID G & ANGELA C BAILEY-ALDRICH 5805 ASHCROFTAVE 5805ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310071 AGNESBERGEE 5808 ASHCROFTAVE 15808ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.531 1 1902824310066 SHIRLEY OXLEY 5809 ASHCROFTAVE 5809ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310072 ROLF D ENGSTROM 5812 ASHCROFTAVE 5812 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310065 JARED HILLMAN & AWSON BENYAS 5813 ASHCROFTAVE 5813ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310073 FRANCIS K GRAF 5816 ASHCROFTAVE 5816 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310064 R G JOHNSON & M M JOHNSON 5817 ASHCROFTAVE 5817 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310074 WAYNE J & PATRICIA L KRATZER 5820 ASHCROFTAVE 5820 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310063 SANDRA L BERG 5821 ASHCROFTAVE 5821 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310075 ANTONIA G BRIMEYER 5824 ASHCROFTAVE 5824ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6477.53 1 1902824310062 JEFFREYAJOHNSON 5825 ASHCROFTAVE 15025ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 - 6,477.53 1 1902824310076 ROBERT E MEYER 51128 ASHCROFTAVE 582BASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310077 JON D RASMUSSEN 5832 ASHCROFTAVE 5832ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310061 WANDASCHUMACHER 5833 ASHCROFTAVE 5833ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902024310078 WARREN & CHARLOTTE H BURRELL 5836 ASHCROFTAVE 5836 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310060 SHANE & HEATHER LANGE 51137 ASHCROFTAVE 5837ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310079 CATHERINE A THOMPSON 5840 ASHCROFTAVE 5840ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310059 JOSHUA D & NICOLE E HOEKSTRA 5841 ASHCROFTAVE 5841 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 8,477.53 1 1902824310080 BARRY & GENEVIEVE SOULAS-LINK 5844 ASHCROFTAVE 5544ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310058 MAGGIAGUSTSSON 5845 ASHCROFTAVE 5845ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310091 KATHY LU-ANN ROMERO 5900 ASHCROFTAVE 5900ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310127 MICHAEL B & SUSAN KLEIN 5901 ASHCROFTAVE 5901 ASHCROFf AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310092 DARRELL PEARSON 5904 ASHCROFT AVE . 4604 VINCENT AVE S MINNEAPOUS, MN 55410 6,477.53 1 1902824310126 TONIAGERST 5905 ASHCROFTAVE 5905ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310093 KRISTIN R ANDERSON 5908 ASHCROFTAVE 590BASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310125 DOROTHY A KRONLOKKEN 5909 ASHCROFTAVE 5909ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6.4T7.531 — 1 1902824310094 BARBARA MORRIS 5912 ASHCROFTAVE 5912ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6.477.531 1 1902824310124 ELLE CHRISTINA REECE 5913 ASHCROFTAVE 4517 XERXES AVE SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410 6,477.53 1 1902824310095 JASON L ABLEITNER 5916 ASHCROFTAVE 5916ASHCROF7TAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310123 THERESA LJOSKI -LANG 5917 ASHCROFTAVE 5917ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310096 SARAH E MCCARTHY 5920 ASHCROFTAVE 5920ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310122 ELAINE JOLSON 5921 ASHCROFTAVE 5921 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310097 BARRY CRATER 5924 ASHCROFTAVE 5924 ASHCROFT AVE EDINAMN755424 6,477.53 1 1902824310098 KEVIN M & PAMELA C FISCHER 5928 ASHCROFTAVE 5928 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310121 JAMES L & JENNIFER L LEE 5929 ASHCROFTAVE 5929 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310120 JOHN C & MARY B WEIDNER 5933 ASHCROFTAVE 5933 ASHCROFT AVE - EDINA MN 55424 6,4T7.531 1 1902824310099 LAVONNE J DUBOIS 5936 ASHCROFTAVE 5936 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 6.477.531 1 1902824310100 RAYMOND A & CORINNE M SHARP 5940 ASHCROFT AVE 5940 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310119 BRYAN & SUSAN KANDERSON 5941 ASHCROFTAVE 5941 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310118 MICHAEL & MARY GROVE 5945 ASHCROFTAVE 5945 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340065 MARK F LOKOWICH 6000 ASHCROFTAVE 6000ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340056 JAMES D SCHLENDER 6001 ASHCROFTAVE 6001 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340066 JAMES & LYNNE E SWANSON 6004 ASHCROFTAVE 6004ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340057 ANN LTORGERSON 6005 ASHCROFTAVE 6005ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340067 HOPE M HEFFELFINGER 6008 ASHCROFTAVE 6008ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340058 ANNE STALLMAN 6009 ASHCROFTAVE 6009ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340068 ROSS M ROBINSON 6012 ASHCROFT AVE 6012 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902624340059 ERIC & MARIANNE BREKKE 6013 ASHCROFTAVE 6013 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340069 SUZANNE REDMAN 6016 ASHCROFTAVE 6016ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340060 STEVEN R & LOIS C ERLING 6017 ASHCROFTAVE 16017ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340070 DAVID & JANICE M CARTER 6020 ASHCROFTAVE 5832 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340061 PAM GAGNON 6021 ASHCROFTAVE 6021 ASHCROFTAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340062 1902824310022 1902824310021 1902824310023 1902824310020 JEFFREY D & KEW L WHITESIDE STEPHANIE A WENDTJOHNSON JOSEPH S TREMEL BENJAMIN R & KARA BOWLING THOMAS R & BARBARA A MADSON 6025 5800 5801 5804 5805 ASHCROFTAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAX AVE FAIRFAX AVE 6025 ASHCROFTAVE 5800 FAIRE AVE 5801 FAIRFAX AVE 5804 FA RFAX AVE 5805 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 4,318.35 4,318.35 6,477.53 6,477.53 1 0.87 0.67 1 1 1902824310024 1902824310019 1902824310025 1902824310018 1902824310026 1902824310017 1902824310027 19028243 0016 1902824310028 1902824310015 190282431OUT 1902824310014 1902824310030 1902824310013 DOUGLAS R HAINING & MARYANN SULLIVAN MAHEDIAJIWANI WILLLALMW BOWERS III JEFFREY &JOD SCHIC HEATHER E SCALF RONALD C & N SSARA WILLIAMSON PER UT E CHARLES R EICHER III KATHRINEAMCCONAHAY JOHN & KAREN KASTAN FRANK WELLMAN GREG S ALLISON JEAN M JOHNSON HAROLD UUENQUIST 5808 5809 5812 5813 5816 5517 5820 5821 5824 5825 5828 5829 5832 5833 FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAX AVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAX AVE FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAXAVE 5808 FAIRFAX AVE 5809 FAIRFAxAvE 5812 FAIRFAX AV 5813 FAIRFAXAVE 5816 FAIRFAX —AVE 5817 FAIRFAXAVE 5820 FAIRFAX-AVE 5821 FAIRFAXAVE 5824 FAIRFAXAVE 5825 FAIRFAX AVE 5828 FAIRFAX AVE 5829 FAIRF AVE 5832 FAIR AVE 5833 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 0,477.531 6,477.531 6,477.531 6,477.531 6,477.53 6,477.53 6,477.53 6,477.53 6,477.53 6,477,53 6,477.53 6,477.53 6,477.53 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1902824310034— OMAS C & CHARLE E FARR 5836 FAIRFAXAVE 5836 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310012 1902824310032 CHRISTOPHER J GORDON LEROYFWIEN 5837 5840 FAIRFAX AVE FAIRFAXAVE 5837 FAIR AVE 5840FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 6,477.53 1 1 1902824310011 DELORES E HEYER 5841 FAIRFAXAVE 5841 FAIRF—ATAUE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310033 JOHN D & ERICA E HACKER 5644 FAIRFAX AVE 5844 FAIR A E EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310010 MICHAEL & ANGELA SKINNER 5845 FAIRFAXAVE 16190 CRYSTAL ILLS DR LAKEVILLE MN 55044 6,477.53 1 1902824310128 1902824310171 ROBERT J KASTAN & SARAH J TRALITMANN RAY M & MARY C CASTER 5900 5901 FAIRFAXAVE FAIRFAX AVE 5900 FAIRFAX AVE 5901 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424, 6.4T7.531 6.477.531 1 1 19028243 0129 PATRICK STEVENS 5904 FAIRFAXAVE 528 SMITH AV SO ST. PAUL N 55107 6,477.53 1 902824310170 WILLIAM TR MA BROWN 5905 FAIRFAXAVE 5905 FAIRF AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.63 1 1902824310130 GILLIAN & TOM GA RIEL 5908 FAIRFAXAVE 5338 PAOLA CIR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437 6,477.53 1 1902824310169 KURT& ALICE MORGENWEC 5909 FAIRFAX AVE 5909 FAIRF AVE EDI MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310131 ANNESPAULDI G 5912 FAIRFAXAVE 5912 FAIRFAX AVE EDINAM 555424 6,477.53 1 1902824310168 CHAP T LE & MI HHA T NGUYEN 5913 FAIRFAXAVE 5913 FAIRFAXA EE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902624310132 DARRELL B PEAR ON 5916 FAIRFAXAVE 4604 VINCENT—AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 6477.53 1 1902824310167 DONALDLJACOBSO 5917 FAIRFAXAVE 5917 FAIR AV EDINA 55424 6477.53 1 1902824310133 SCOTT R & ELIZABETH A W BERCAW 5920 FAIRFAX AVE 5920 FAIRFAX AVE JEDINAMN55424 6,477.63 1 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ST. JOHN'S PARK NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-367 1 1902824310166 ICHRISTOPHER E PEARSON 1 5921 IFFGIRFCYAVF 1171A1111 IFTAVG cT cniu /JINFS1nr 1902824310134 EDWARD & PATRICIA BEADLE 5924 FAIRFAXAVE 5924 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1824310165 SUSAN MARIE QUIRT 5925 FAIRFAXAVE 5925 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 824310135 JANE PARRY 5928 FAIRFAXAVE 5928 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 8477.53 1 !624310164 STEPHANIE A ALBERT 5929 FAIRFAXAVE 5929 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN55424 6,477.53 1 .d 2824310163 JOANN KLAASSEN 5933 FAIRFAXAVE 6933FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477,53 1 1902824310136 GENE ERICKSON 5936 FAIRFAXAVE 5936FAIR-FARAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310162 STEPHEN & PAMELA PEMBERTON 5937 FAIRFAX AVE 8030 133RD ST W APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 6,477.53 1 1902824310137 AMY J E & PATRICK M G LANDELLE 5940 FAIRFAXAVE 5940 FAIRFAX AVE EDI A MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310 38 DEBRA K OLSON 5944 FAIRFAXAVE 5944 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824310161 ESTRELLITA & ARIEL LACSAMANA 5945 FAIRFAXAVE. 5945 FAIRFAX -AVE EDINA MN55424 6.477.531 1 1902824340048 LYN FJOH SSON 6000 FAIRFAXAVE 6000 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340047 DEMOS P & E GENIA HADJIYANIS 6001 FAIRFAXAVE 6001 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340049 ALLEN BROSIUS 6004 FAIRFAXAVE 6004 FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340048 MARY DURAN 6005 FAIRFAXAVE 6005FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340050 SHERRY & JASON ULRICH 6008 FAIRFAXAVE 6008FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340045 SARA A SEXTON 6009 FAIRFAX AVE 6009 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 WILLIAM R DANTZER & DANIELE WEZEMBEEK -0PPEM, BELGIUM 1902824340051 KARLESKIND 6012 FAIRFAXAVE 132 J.B. DEKEYZERSTRAAT 1970 8,477.53 1 1902824340044 JAKE & TY LLC 6013 FAIRFAXAVE 16313 NORTHWOOD RD NW PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 6,477.53 1 1902824340052 PATRICK R & SHEILA D SHANE 6016 FAIRFAXAVE 6016FAIRFAXAVE EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340105 BRUCE P SCHMALTZ 6017 FAIRFAXAVE 6017 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN55424 6477.53 1 1902824340053 RITA MARIE PARIS 6020 FAIRFAX AVE 6020 FAIRFAXA E EDINA MN 55424 6,477.53 1 1902824340104 MARY GAIL SCOTT 6021 FAIRFAXAVE 6021 FAIRFAXAVE EDINAMN554 44 6,477,53 1 1902824340054 1A R2d.' MRn REID R &ANNE KA LINDQ IST ANTM —.R Ie 11-1 R D-E5 6024 cnno 1 FAIRFAXAVE _...._... ..._ 6024 FAIR F AVE ........ _......... ..._ EDINA MN 55424 __...__... _____ 6,477.53 1 170.67 FINAL PROJECT COST $ 1,105,51921 $ 6,477.53 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 13, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -357 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated- addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 13th day of September, 2010. Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Edina Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 5, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider and possibly adopt a proposed special assessment and to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to the proposed special assessment for the following improvement: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA: 357: ST. JOHN'S PARK NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION The area proposed to be assessed for the project is the St. John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $1,105,519.21. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Amount: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT OPTIONS The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending. over a period of 10 years at the rate of 5.75 %. Following the assessment hearing, and City Council formal adoption of the assessment roll, you may pay the assessment as follow: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. 2. Pay a minimum of 25% of the assessment by November 30, 2010 (authorized by ordinance). Your remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 3. If not paid by November 30, 2010, the assessment will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 4. Deferral on homesteads owned by persons 65 years of aae or older: Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. MAKING YOUR PAYMENT 1. Make your check payable to the City of Edina and return by mail to the City of Edina, Assessing Department, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, with your statement; or 2. Make payment in person in the Assessing Department, City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 -927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within to (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 13, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk r. PROPOSED 1:; AM STATEMENT �r ��'• leas City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952- 826 -0365 THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL - PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: TAXPAYER (S): YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 6. 2010 Total Assessment: $6,477.53 Interest Rate: 5.75% Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Remaining Principal 2010 $ 93.11 1 2011 $ 647.75 $ 372.46 $ 1,113.33 $ 5,829.78 2 2012 $ 647.75 $ 335.21 $ 982.97 $ 5182.02 3 2013 $ 647.75 $ 297.97 $ 945.72 $ 4,534.27 4 2014 $ 647.75 $ 260.72 $ 908.47 $ 3,886.52 5 2015 $ 647.75 $ 223.47 $ 871.23 $ 3,238.77 6 2016 $ 647.75 $ 186.23 $ 833.98 $ 2,591.01 7 2017 $ 647.75 $ 148.98 $ 796.74 $ 1,943.26 8 2018 $ 647.75 $ 111.74 $ 759.49 $ 1295.51 9 2019 $ 647.75 $ 74.49 $ 722.24 $ 647.75 10 2020 $ 647.75 $ 37.25 $ 685.00 $ 0.00 $ 6,477.53 $ 2,141.63 $ 8,619.16 Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600 1902824310069 DOROTHY N SCOTT 5800 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310067 DAVID G & ANGELA C BAILEY - ALDRICH 5805 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310072 ROLF D ENGSTROM 5812 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310064 R G JOHNSON & M M JOHNSON 5817 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310075 ANTONIA G BRIMEYER 5824 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310077 JON D RASMUSSEN 5832 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310060 SHANE & HEATHER LANGE 5837 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 i ♦ Bend along line to iFeed Paper �` � xpose Pop-Up EdgeTm ' 1902824310068 MOIRA & JOSHUA OLSON 5801 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310071 AGNES BERGEE 5808 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310065 JARED HILLMAN & ALLISON BENYAS 5813 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 rA a AVERY® 5960Tm 1902824310070 TIFFANY D FAHNHORST 4506 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424 1902824310066 SHIRLEY OXLEY 5809 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310073 FRANCIS K GRAF 5816 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310074 1902824310063 WAYNE J & PATRICIA L KRATZER SANDRA L BERG 5820 ASHCROFT AVE 5821 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310062 1902824310076 JEFFREY A JOHNSON ROBERT E MEYER 5825 ASHCROFT AVE 5828 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310061 WANDA SCHUMACHER 5833 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310079 CATHERINE A THOMPSON 5840 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310080 1902824310058 BARRY & GENEVIEVE SOULAS -LINK MAGGI AGUSTSSON 5844 ASHCROFT AVE 5845 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310127 1902824310092 MICHAEL B & SUSAN KLEIN DARRELL PEARSON 5901 ASHCROFT AVE 4604 VINCENT AVE S EDINA MN 55424 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410 1902824310093 KRISTIN R ANDERSON 5908 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310125 DOROTHY KRONLOKKEN 5909 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310078 WARREN & CHARLOTTE H BURRELL 5836 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310059 JOSHUA D & NICOLE E HOEKSTRA 5841 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310091 KATHY LU -ANN ROMERO 5900 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310126 TONI A GERST 5905 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310094 BARBARA MORRIS 5912 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes faciles a peter A Itepliez h la hachure afin d w e ww avery com .._... -- Sens de MiAler la rahnrd Poe -UnTm ! 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Q AVERY® 5960TM • Use Avery Template 5160® i Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up Edge*" j 1902824310124 ELLE CHRISTINA REECE 4517 XERXES AVE SO MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410 1902824310096 SARAH E MCCARTHY . 5920 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310098 KEVIN M & PAMELA C FISCHER 5928 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310099 LAVONNE J DUBOIS 5936 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310118 MICHAEL & MARY GROVE 5945 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340066 JAMES & LYNNE E SWANSON 6004 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340058 ANNE S TALLMAN 6009 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340069 SUZANNE REDMAN 6016 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340061 PAM GAGNON 6021 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310021 JOSEPH S TREMEL 5801 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310095 JASON L ABLEITNER 5916 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310122 ELAINE J OLSON 5921 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310121 JAMES L & JENNIFER L LEE 5929 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310100 RAYMOND A & CORINNE M SHARP 5940 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340065 MARK F LOKOWICH 6000 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340057 ANN L TORGERSON 6005 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340068 ROSS M ROBINSON 6012 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340060 STEVEN R & LOIS C ERLING 6017 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340062 JEFFREY D & KELLI L WHITESIDE 6025 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310023 BENJAMIN R & KARA BOWLING 5804 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310123 THERESA L JOSKI -LANG 5917 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310097 BARRY CRATER 5924 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310120 JOHN C & MARY B WEIDNER 5933 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 I 1902824310119 j BRYAN & SUSAN K ANDERSON 5941 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340056 JAMES D SCHLENDER 6001 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340067 HOPE M HEFFELFINGER 6008 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340059 ERIC & MARIANNE BREKKE 6013 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340070 DAVID & JANICE M CARTER 5832 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310022 STEPHANIE A WENDT- JOHNSON 5800 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310020 THOMAS R & BARBARA A MADSON 5805 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 ittl uettes fables eler. ; Repliez 6 la hachure afin de I www avery com _ _ .. . . _P__�.b, _ _ i Sens de __�_� II-Tu I 1Jtfl/Lf+A.AVFRY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTm j 1902824310024 1902824310019 DOUGLAS R HAINING & MARYANN MAHEDI A JIWANI SULLIVAN 5809 FAIRFAX AVE 5808 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310018 JEFFREY & JODY SCHICK 5813 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310027 PER A UTNE 5820 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 ' 1902824310015 JOHN & KAREN KASTAN 5825 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310030 JEAN M JOHNSON 5832 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310012 CHRISTOPHER J GORDON 5837 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310033 JOHN D & ERICA E HACKER 5844 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310171 RAY M & MARY C CASTER 5901 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310130 GILLIAN & TOM GABRIEL 5338 PAOLA CIR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437 1902824310168 CHAP T LE & MINHHA T NGUYEN 5913 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310026 HEATHER E SCALF 5816 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310016 CHARLES R EICHER III 5821 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310029 FRANK WELLMAN 5828 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310013 HAROLD LILJENQUIST 5833 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310032 LEROY F WIEN 5840 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310010 MICHAEL & ANGELA SKINNER 16190 CRYSTAL HILLS DR LAKEVILLE MN 55044 1902824310129 PATRICK STEVENS 528 SMITH AVE SO ST. PAUL, MN 55107 1902824310169 KURT & ALICE MORGENWECK 5909 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310132 DARRELL B PEARSON 4604 VINCENT AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 QAVERY O 5960*rm 1902824310025 WILLIAM W BOWERS III 5812 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310017 RONALD C & NUSSARA WILLIAMSON 5817 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310028 KATHRINE A MCCONAHAY 5824 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310014 GREG S ALLISON 5829 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310031 THOMAS C & CHARLENE FARR 5836 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310011 DELORES E HEYER 5841 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310128 ROBERT J KASTAN & SARAH J TRAUTMANN 5900 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310170 WILLIAM TRUMAN BROWN 5905 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310131 ANNE SPAULDING 5912 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310167 DONALD L JACOBSON 5917 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 INquettes faciles A peler ; A Repilez h la hachure afin de ; www.avery com - - ._ -- - -- r' -- - -^ Sens de .A..Al.., I^ �I —A D^, l InTM I 1- Se0-GO -AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTm j 1902824310133 1902824310166 SCOTT R & ELIZABETH A W CHRISTOPHER E PEARSON' BERCAW 1716 JULIET AVE 5920 FAIRFAX AVE ST. PAUL, MN 55105 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310165 1902824310135 SUSAN MARIE QUIRT JANE S PARRY 5925 FAIRFAX AVE 5928 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424• 1902824310163 1902824310136 JO ANN KLAASSEN GENE ERICKSON 5933 FAIRFAX AVE 5936 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310137 I 1902824310138 AMY J E& PATRICK M G LANDELLE DEBRA K OLSON 5940 FAIRFAX AVE 5944 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824340048 LYNN F JOHNSON 6000 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340046 MARY DURAN 6005 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340051 WILLIAM R DANTZER & DANIELE KARLESKIND - 132 J.B. DEKEYZERSTRAAT WEZEMBEEK- OPPEM, BELGIUM 1970 1902824340105 BRUCE P SCHMALTZ 6017 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340054 REID R & ANNE K LINDQUIST 6024 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310045 KRISTOPHER WILSON 5801 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340047 DEMOS P & EUGENIA HADJIYANIS 6001 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340050 SHERRY & JASON ULRICH 6008 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340044 JAKE & TY LLC 16313 NORTHWOOD RD NW PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 1902824340053 RITA MARIE PARIS 6020 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340055 ANTHONY M & JANICE L MIRELEZ 6028 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310047 MATTHEW QUAM 5804 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 QAVERYO 5960T' 1902824310134 EDWARD & PATRICIA BEADLE 5924 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310164 STEPHANIE A ALBERT 5929 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310162 STEPHEN & PAMELA PEMBERTON 8030 133RD ST W APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 1902824310161 ESTRELLITA & ARIEL LACSAMANA 5945 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340049 ALLEN BROSIUS 6004 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340045 SARA A SEXTON 6009 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340052 PATRICK R & SHEILA D SHANE 6016 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340104 MARY GAIL SCOTT 6021 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310046 ALAN L & MICHELE W BARR 5800 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310044 VITOLD A EVELE 5805 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 IhI uettes faciles a eler i A Repliez 3 la hachure afin de i www avery com _ ..... Q _P _�r _ _ __� , Sens de I- —&._r nom_ I I-TM 1 I- Rnn- rrLAVFRV Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i A AVERVO 5960Th Use Avery® Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j V 1902824310048 MARY L WILCOX 5808 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310042 BRANT P & BECKY G HOLLENKAMP 5813 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310051 CAROLYN JASPERSON & SAID MOTAMED 5820 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310039 EARL & MARGARET WITTEN 5825 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310054 DAVID J CARTER 5832 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 i 1 1902824310036 JAMES A BLOOSTON 5837 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310057 KIRK L & LISA M JOHNSON 5844 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310148 JULIA H SVENSSON 5901 ST JOHNS AVE. EDINA MN 55424 1902824310114 BRUCE C JONDAHL 5908 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310145 DIANE R TARR 1 5917 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310043 LINDSAY K SCHULTZ 5809 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310050 STEVEN B & KIMBERLY 5816 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310040 JAY DIENST 5821 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310049 GARRETT HILK 24 WOODLAND RD EDINA MN 55436 1902824310041 J MELIN ERICA MAYBORNE & PETER ROOSE 5817 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310053 CHARLES W FEE & JENNIFER J SHERIDAN 5828 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310037 ELIZABELTH QUISLING 5833 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310056 GLENN B & JULIE K WILLENBRING 5840 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310034 CECILIA MEIER 5845 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310113 BETH ANN SCHOENIG 5904 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310146 THOMAS J & NANCY S CUMMINGS 5913 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310116 PETER C MCCOMBER 5920 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310052 KATHLEEN S FOGT 5824 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310038 OMAR & PATRICIA M KOUATLI 5829 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310055 MERIDITH JOHNSON 5836 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310035 TOM & SUSAN VON ESCHEN 5841 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310112 HOWARD S & PAMELA B FRIEDMAI 5900 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310147 CHARLES W BURNHAM 5905 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310115 JOSEPH FEYDER 5916 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824310144 DOROTHY R MEYER 5925 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 Ittiquettes faciles A peler ; A Repliez h la hachure afrn de ; www.avery.com Senscle Utlllsez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 1 Aamp 1- 800 -GO -AVERY ment r6v6ler le rebord Pop -UpTM i u easy Peel Labels i A Bend along ine to Use Avery® Template 5160 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge 1902824310143 i 1902824310142 LESLIE SIPPRELL KATHERINE BARTON 5929 ST JOHNS AVE 5933 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824310140 1902824310139 BRUCE PLADSON JOHN C & NANCY J PETERSON 5941 ST JOHNS AVE 5945 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824340081 1902824340096 MICHAEL SKINNER TODD OVERMOEN & MELANIE B 2200 W 53RD ST REILAND MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419 6004 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340097 1902824340083 RICHARD O & TRACEY PETERSON RICHARD D HAY 6008 ST JOHNS AVE 6009 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824340084 1902824340099 ANGELA GREEN LEO W FOURRE 6013 ST JOHNS'AVE 6016 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1902824340100 MICHAEL T SCHAITBERGER 6020 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340087 ANTHONY J & MARGO E ARENS 6025 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340089 TIMOTHY M & CARMEN ROSLAND 6031 -33 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340086 PATRICK RUPP & CATHARINE CUDDEBACK 6021 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340102 MARVIS L & JANET L HAAS 6028 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340064 RAYMOND OCONNELL 4612 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424 lhilquettes faciles 3 peler ; A Repliez A la hachure afin de Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 511600 Sens deM r6v6ler le rebord Pop -UpTm ; U AVERY® 5960* 1902824310141 B E FORNELL 5937 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340095 JEFFREY & ANN M OBERLE 6000 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340082 CHRIS J DOVOLIS P.O. BOX 75 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 1902824340098 RICKARD A RYGIN 6012 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340085 ELIZABETH J HAVERSACK 6017 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340101 RICHARD A CARLSON 6024 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340088 MARTIN & PAMELA J MONTILINO 6029 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824340071 ROBERT T & KAREN P OLSON 4616 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424 www.avery.com 1- 800 -GO -AVERY i September 29, 2010 City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 To the Edina City Council, i This letter is in regards to the St John's Park Neighborhood Reconstruction Project (Street improvement No. BA: 357) and the proposed assessment for my property (property PID 1902824310143) in the amount of $6,477.53. Since I am unable to attend the public hearing in person, I am letting you know of my objection to this assessment in writing. As a divorced, working mother of two kids who pays monthly alimony and child support, I literally live from check -to -check and do not have any remaining funds to pay this type of assessment. This is the reason why I signed the petition last year (along with all of my neighbors) to object to the project in the first place. If I have to pay this assessment (or any portion thereof), you will be responsible foe my incurring additional debt as I will have no choice but to put it on a credit card and pay exorbitant interest rates while I struggle to eventually pay down the debt. This is what caused the financial collapse in our country in the first place, people using credit for things they can not afford. I am struggling and working hard to provide for myself and my two boys and live in a small house that we can barely afford. I honestly don't understand how you can expect me (or anyone else in our neighborhood) to suddenly fork over a small fortune. I will happily supply you with copies of my paycheck, banking statement and monthly expenses to prove to you that paying this assessment would be a great financial hardship for my family and me. I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Thank you. Leslie Sipprell 5929 St John's Ave Edina, MN 55424 952 - 928 -3041 CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: MICS EXPENSES PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: PROJECT FINANCE COST: TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: ASSESSABLE UNITS: ASSESSABLE COST LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: Roadway Improvements: BA -358 South Garden Estates Neighborhood Improvements Actual Midwest Asphalt $ 409,633.45 $ 62,940.64 $ 472, 574.09 $ 500.00 $ 22,173.39 Proposed (Pending) $ 495,247.48 $ 815,500.00 91.31 $ 5,423.80 $ 8,931.15 TOTAL $ 495,247.48 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT = $ 8,931.15 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT = $ 5,423.80 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST $ 5,423.80 10 YEARS 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2E 2£ 3C 31 3's 3 34 3: 3E 31 U 3£ a 8 e 8 9 8 8 a 8 e 8 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -358 STREET PID# LOT BLOCK STREET NO. OWNER StreetAddrese City /StatalOP ASSESSABLE REU TOTAL REU ASSESSMENT COST Andover Road 3102824210044 5 1 4444 Philip and Kathleen Black 0.33 0.33 $1,789.85 Andover Road 3102824210054 1 5 4445 Timothy N. Doyle 0.33 0.33 $1,789.85 Andover Road 3102624210040 2 2 4500 Mark Grossman and Theresa Lau 1.00 1.00 $5,423.50 Andover Road 3102824210048 1 3 4501 Felipe and Bonnie Padilla 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210047 3 2 4504 JoanMcglrl 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 31D282421 DD49 2 3 4505 Robert and Beth Huntley 1 1.00 1.00 1 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210021 10 2 4508 Troy and Greta Mason 1.00 1600 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210022 1 3 4509 Jane Linton 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210020 9 2 4512 Robert Rine 140 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210023 2 3 4515 Stephen Bowman 1.00 1.00 $5,42180 Andover Road 3102824210019 e 2 4518 Richard and Trisha Lundberg 1.00 1.00 $5,423.60 Andover Road 3102824210024 3 3 4517 Maynard T. Nelson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3lo2a24210018 7 2 4520 Jon and May Jo Straub 1.09 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210025 4 3 4521 Gregroy and Mary Clapp 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210017 8 2 4524 Justin IOelfer 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210026 6 3 4525 U Wen and Su Oiong Zhou 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Andover Road 3102824210027 8 3 4529 Cad Thomsen 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210051 4 3 4500 Thomas M SlpkBq 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 BeMdere Lane 3102824210053 2 4 _ 4501 Kevin and Jean Halm 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210050 3 3 4504 Jeremy Damn Green 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210052 1 4 4505 Marshall D. Johnson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 704 Sunmyside Rd 3102824210033 12 3 4508 A Walld and Mark B. KouatU 4704 Sunnyslde Rd Edina, MN 55424 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210034 1 4 4509 Tony R. Skunberg 100 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210032 11 3 4512 Gay Austin Hudson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210035 2 4 4513 E Michael and Deborah McConnell 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210031 10 3 4518 Barbara Halloran 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210036 3 4 4517 Bibbln and BradyByykkonen 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210030 9 3 4520 Charles H. Blalock 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 6600 Sally lane 3102824210037 4 4 4521 Rim Family Partnership 6600 Sally lane Edina. MN 55439 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210029 8 3 4524 Stroll and Rita Swanson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210038 5 4 4525 John Lundeen 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210028 7 3 4528 Richard and Leann Landis 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Belvidere Lane 3102824210039 B 4 4529 James H. Jensen 1.00 1.00 $5,42180 Claremore Court 3102824210084 3 8 4500 Kurt and Sarah Erickson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Claremore Court 3102824210093 12 8 4501 Michael and Sally Ebnel 1.00 1.00 $5,423.60 Claremore Court 3102824210085 4 8 4504 William-and Lori Prebll us 1.00 $5,423.80 Claremore Court 3102824210092 11 8 4505 1 Dona and Eric Greene 1.00 1.00 $5,423.60 Claremore Court 3102824210086 6 8 4508 Bruce and Kelly Kohn 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Claremore Court 3102824210087 10 8 4509 Scoti and Roberts Meesle 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Claremore Court 3102824210087 6 8 4512 Son. Sterrenln and Angelica Prado 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Claremore Court 3102824210090 9 8 4513 Paul end Joan Otness 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 ! Claremore Court 3102824210089 8 a 4517 Mark E. Baumbach 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 I Claremore Court 3102824210088 7 8 4521 Patricia Merritt 140 1.Oo $5,423.60 Claremore Drive 3102824210072 12 2 4440 Joeeph and Maureen Giwer 0.33 0.33 $1,789.85 i Claremore Drive 310282A210078 11 4 4441 Charles J. RadloO 0.33 0.33 $1,769.85 i Dunham Drive 3102824130071 4 4400 Georges. Rea Sr. 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Dunham Drive 3102824130070 4 4404 e ere and Jennifer Lange 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 I Dunham Drive 3102824130076 5 4405 Erik I. Sposeep 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 I Dunham Drive 3102824130089 F28 4 4408 Gelr and Susan Johansen 1.00 1.00 $5,423.90 lDunhamDrive 3102824130068 4 4412 Curt and CherylZweber 1.00 1.00 $5,423.60 Dunham Drive 3102824130097 4 4416 Leda Cant Davis 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 t P.O. Box 24141 3102824130068 4 4420 Paulette and Paul David Hastings P.O. Box 24141 Edina. MN 65424 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 I Dunham Drive 3102824240004 5 4421 Paul R. Svanberg 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Dunham Drive 3102824240003 17 4 4424 Nelson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 i Dunham Drive 3102824740005 3 5 4425 AMn and Christine Mlasah 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 1 Dunham Drive 3102824240002 10 4 4428 Gay P. Galda 1.00 1.00 $8,423.80 Dunham Drive 3102824240008 4 5 4429 Virginia Thompson 1.10 1.00 $5,423.80 i P.O. Box 5511 3102824240001 15 4 4432 John Nordin P.O. Box 5541 HopkkM MN 55343 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 1 Dunham Drive 3102824240007 6 5 4433 Janke L Holslad 7.00 1000 $5,423.80 Dunham Drive 3102824210081 14 4 4438 Glendon Nygaard 140 1.00 $5,423.80 I Dunham Drive 3102824240008 8 6 4437 Michael and Robin Ktlppensteln 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 >. Dunham Drive" 3702824210080 13 4 4440 Thomas and Margaret Taft 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 i Dunham Drive 3102824240009 7 5 4441 Scott and Carmel Dunlop 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 1 Dunham Drive 3102824210079 12 4 4444 -George Gfiffill. III and Bonnie Gdf6tiu 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 £ Dunham Drive 3102874240010 8 5 4445 Mark and Julle Manfred 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 i Dunham Drive 3102824210094 13 8 4500 Ronald and Madreanne Datong 0.33 0.33 $1,709.85 F Ellsworth Drive 3102824130077 17 5 4412 Donald Bergum 0.33 0.33 $1,789.85 i West Shore Drive 3102824210008 4 1 7000 Natsly and Aslm Baig 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 3 West Shore Drive 3102824210015 4 2 7001 Afison and Joanne Bolduc 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 1 West Shore Drive 3102824210016 5 2 7007 Mark Ettinger 1.00 1.00 $5,423.60 I West Shore Drive 3702824210007 6 1 7008 Ronald R. Rich 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 7 West Shore Drive 310282421 DODS a 1 7012 Robert P. Pakola 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 3 West Shore Drive 3102824210009 7 1 7016 Donald and Caryn Gjavm 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 4 West Shore Drive 3102874210010 8 1 7020 Ruth Johnson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 5 West Shore Drive 3102824210011 9 1 7074 May and Craig Coleman 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 a West Shore Drive 3102824210103 1 9 7100 Fred and Joanne Jaeger 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 7 West Shore Drive 3102824210104 2 9 7104 Hosmer A Brown 111 1.00 1.00 $5,423.50 3 West Shore Drive 3102824210105 3 9 7108 John R Hacker 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 9 West Shore Drive 3102824210102 21 a 7109 Rex McClelland 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 D West Shore Drive 3102824210108 4 9 7112 Kenneth R HdBhaus _ 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 1 West Shore Drive 3102824210101 20 8 7113 Robert end Nancy Mendel 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 2 West Shore Drive 3102824210107 5 9 7116 Joel and May Teuer 140 1.00 $5,423.80 3 West Shore Drive 3102824210100 19 8 7117 Russell and KWlhleen Nelson 1.00 1 1.00 $5,423.80 4 West Shore Drive 3102824210108 6 9 7120 David and Jane Metros 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 5 West Shore Drive 3102824210099 18 8 7121 Jena and Jill Jorgensen 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 a Wooddale Avenue 3102824210045 1 2 7000 Rabe=Foster 1.O D 1.00 $5,423.80 7 Wooddale Avenue 310282A21OW2 3 1 7001 Joshua D. DeWolf 1.00 1.00 $5,42320 8 Wooddale Avenue 3102824210043 4 1 7005 Jason A Hurley 1.00 1.00 $5,429.80 9 Wooddale Avenue 3102624210055 o s 7o21 Ibrahim and KeMerlm Tabakovld 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 0 Wooddale Avenue 3102874210058 9 5 7025 Robert LUndbahg 1.00 1.00 55,423.80 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-358 Wooddale Avenue 3102824210057 4 5 7029 Kama Jones CWien 1.00 1.00 55,423.80 WooddaleAvenue 3102624210058 5 6 7033 Jeffery and KathySfirJdes 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Wooddale Avenue 3102624210073 13 2 7037 Richard Crow and Nola Forarar 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 Wooddele Avenue 3102624210082 1 a 7104 Jane Dalton Anderson 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 6909 West Share Dr 3102824210083 2 6 7108 Ricky Hula 6909 West Shore Dr Edina, MN 55435 1.00 1.00 $5,423.80 18675 Nlynnfleld Rd 3102824210003 1 1 4701 Teresa E Cosgrove ---TOTAL 18675 Wynnfleld Rd 55347 0.33 0.33 $1,789.85 REU 9131 6131 PRELIMINARY TOTAL ROADWAY COST $496,247A8 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REM 91.31 AVERAGE COST PER REU $6,423.80 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 13, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for South Garden Estates Neighborhood Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -358 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 13th day of September, 2010. i Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Edina Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 5, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to consider and possibly adopt a proposed special assessment and to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to the proposed special assessment for the following improvement: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA: 358: SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION The area proposed to be assessed for the project is the South Garden Estates Neighborhood Reconstruction. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $495,247.48. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Amount: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT OPTIONS The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years at the rate of 5.75 %. Following the assessment hearing, and City Council formal adoption of the assessment roll, you may pay the assessment as follow: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. 2. Pay a minimum of 25% of the assessment by November 30, 2010 (authorized by ordinance). Your remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 3. If not paid by November 30, 2010, the assessment will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year's payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2011, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5.75% per annum from October 5, 2010 to December 31, 2011. 4. Deferral on homesteads owned by persons 65 years of age or older: Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. MAKING YOUR PAYMENT 1. Make your check payable to the City of Edina and return by mail to the City of Edina, Assessing Department, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, with your statement; or 2. Make payment in person in the Assessing Department, City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street. City all 952 -927 -8861 y FAX 952- 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.Cityofedina.com APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessmE unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edin,., prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 13, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk O e , City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0365 THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL - PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: TAXPAYER (S): YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- pay6nent Calculation based upon adoption October 5, 2010 Total Assessment: $5,423.80 Interest Rate: 5.75% Remaining Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Principal 2010 $ 77.97 1 2011 $ 542.38 $ 311.87 $ 932.22 $ 4,881.42 2 2012 $ 542.38 $ 280.68 $ 823.06 $ 4,339.04 3 2013 $ 542.38 $ 249.49 $ 791.87 $ 3,796.66 4 2014 $ 542.38 $ 218.31 $ 760.69 $ 3,254.28 5 2015 $ 542.38 $ 187.12 $ 729.50 $ 2,711.90 6 2016 $ 542.38 $ 155.93 $ 698.31 $ 2,169.52 7 2017 $ 542.38 $ 124.75 $ 667.13 $ 1,627.14 8 2018 $ 542.38 $ 93.56 $ 635.94 $ 1,084.76 9 2019 $ 542.38 $ 62.37 $ 604.75 $ 542.38 10 2020 $ 542.38 $ 31.19 $ 573.57 $ - $ 5,423.80 $ 1,793.24 $ 7,217.04 Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600 3102824210044 Philip and Kathleen Black 4444 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210048 Felipe and Bonnie Padilla 4501 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210021 Troy and Greta Mason 4508 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210023 Stephen Bowman 4515 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210018 Jon and Mary Jo Straub 4520 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210026 Li Wen and Su Qiong Zhou 4525 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210053 Kevin and Jean Holm 4501 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 • Bend along line to a AVERI�® 5960T^ jFeed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeT" [ 3102824210054 3102824210046 Timothy N. Doyle Mark Grossman and Theresa Lau 4445 Andover Road 4500 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210047 Joan Mcgirl 4504 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210022 Jane Linton 4509 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210019 Richard and Trisha Lundberg 4516 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210025 Gregroy and Mary Clapp 4521 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210027 Carl Thomsen 4529 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210050 Jeremy and Dawnn Green 4504 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210033 3102824210034 A. Walid and Mark B. Kouatli Tony R. Skunberg 4704 Sunnyside Rd 4509 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55424 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210035 3102824210031 E Michael and Deborah McConnell Barbara Halloran 4513 Belvidere Lane 4516 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210030 Charles H. Blalock 4.520 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210037 Ries Family Partnership 6600 Sally Lane Edina, MN 55439 3102824210049 Robert and Beth Huntley 4505 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210020 Robert Rine 4512 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210024 Maynard T. Nelson 4517 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210017 Justin Kieffer 4524 Andover Road Edina, MN 55435 3102824210051 Thomas M. Sipkins 4500 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210052 Marshall D. Johnson 4505 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210032 Gary Austin Hudson 4512 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210036 Bibbin and Bradly Byykkonen 4517 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210029 Scott and Rita Swanson 4524 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 Iftiquettes faciles peter ; A Repliez 3 la hachure afin de ; www.averycom Utiliepz In eaharit AVERY® 51600 '�SeMn�s de^� r6vdler le rebord Pop-Up- 1 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i o AVERYO 5960TI Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 3102824210038 John Lundeen 4525 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210084 Kurt and Sarah Erickson 4500 Claremore Court I Edina, MN 55435 3102824210092 Dona and Eric Greene 4505 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 3102824210028 Richard and Leann Landis 4528 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210093 Michael and Sally Ebnet 4501 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 3102824210086 Bruce and Kathy Kohn 4508 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 3102824210087 3102824210090 Boris Stevenin and Angelica Prado Paul and Joan Otness 4512 Claremore Court 4513 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210088 3102824210072 Patricia Merritt Joeeph and Maureen Glover 4521 Claremore Court 4440 Claremore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824130071 George S. Rea Sr. 4400 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824130069 Geir and Susan Johansen 4408 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824130066 Paulette and Paul David Hastings P.O. Box 24141 Edina, MN 55435 3102824240005 Alvin and Christine Misselt 4425 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 1102824240001 .john Nordin P.O. Box 5541 Hopkins, MN 55343 3102824130070 William Belvedere and Jennifer Lange 4404 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824130068 Curt and Cheryl Zweber 4412 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824240004 Paul R. Swanberg 4421 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824240002 Gary P. Gaida 4428 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824240007 Janice L. Hoistad 4433 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824210039 James H. Jensen 4529 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 3102824210085 William and Lori Prebil 4504 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 3102824210091 Scott and Roberta Moesle 4509 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 3102824210089 Mark E. Baumbach 4517 Claremore Court Edina, MN 55435 3102824210078 Charles J. Radloff 4441 Claremore Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824130076 Erik I. Sposeep 4405 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824130067 Linda Carlson Davis 4416 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824240003 Eman Zohdy - Nelson and Daniel Nelson 4424 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824240006 Virginia Thompson 4429 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 3102824210081 Glendon Nygaard 4436 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 Ittilquettes fadles 3 peler A Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utillsez le aaharit AVERY@ 51600 'borne don+ r6v6ler le rebord Pop -Up7" i 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Use Avery® Template 5160® j Feed Paper - expose Pop-Up Edge*"" j U "� `�� 9 " 3102824240008 3102824210080 3102824240009 Michael and Robin Klippenstein Thomas and Margaret Taft Scott and Carmel Dunlop 4437 Dunham Drive 4440 Dunham Drive 4441 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 ' 3102824210079 3102824240010 3102824210094 George Griffiths III and Bonnie Mark and Julie Manfred Ronald and Madreanne Delong Griffiths 4445 Dunham Drive 4500 Dunham Drive 4444 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824130077 I 3102824210006 3102824210015 Donald Bergum Nataly and Asim Baig Alison and Joanne Bolduc 4412 Ellsworth Drive 7000 West Shore Drive 7001 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210016 3102824210007 3102824210008 Mark Ettinger Ronald R. Rich Robert P. Pakola 7007 West Shore Drive 7008 West Shore Drive 7012 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210009 3102824210010 3102824210011 Donald and Caryn Gjevre Ruth Johnson Mary and Craig Coleman 7016 West Shore Drive 7020 West Shore Drive 7024 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210103 3102824210104 3102824210105 Fred and Joanne Jaeger Hosmer A. Brown III John R. Hacker 7100 West Shore Drive 7104 West Shore Drive 7108 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210102 3102824210106 3102824210101 Rex McClelland Kenneth R. Holthaus Robert and Nancy Mendel 7109 West Shore Drive 7112 West Shore Drive 7113 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210107 I 3102824210100 3102824210108 Joel and Mary Tauer Russell and Kathleen Nelson David and Jane Melroe 7116 West Shore Drive 7117 West Shore Drive 7120 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210099 3102824210045 3102824210042. Jens and Jill Jorgensen Rebecca Foster Joshua D. DeWolf 7121 West Shore Drive 7000 Wooddale Avenue 7001 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210043 3102824210055 3102824210056 Jason A. Hurley Ibrahim and Katmerka Tabakovic Robert Lundberg 7005 Wooddale Avenue 7021 Wooddale Avenue 7025 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 ttiquettes fables 3 peter ; A Repllez 31a hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utillsez le abarit AVERY® 5160® 9 t Sens de r6vdler le rebord Pop -Up*Tm ' charoement 1 1- 800 -GO -AVERY wvca 1 12CHU amilly 11110 W Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge*"" i Sul AV=lCYW 59t 3102824210057 3102824210058 3102824210073 Karen Jones Cullen Jeffery and Kathy Stickles Richard Crow and Nola Fortner 7029 Wooddale Avenue 7033 Wooddale Avenue 7037 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 3102824210082 3102824210083 3102824210003 Jane Dalton Anderson Ricky Huie Teresa E. Cosgrove 7104 Wooddale Avenue 6909 West Shore Dr 18675 Wynnfield Rd Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 Eden Prairie, MN 55347 1= tiquettes fadles 3 peter ; A S de Repliez A la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utillsez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 j cha ement r6vEler le rebord Pop -Up*M j 1- 80"0-AVERY �,A35Y Jack Sullivan From: Sharon Allison Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 201010:42 AM To: Jack Sullivan Cc: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Street Improvement No. BA: 358: Proposed Assessment Jack - See email below. I think this should be printed and submitted to Council. Regarding his item #2, we do have 89 full REU and 7 1/3 for a total of 91.31 REU and this is what the calculation was based on. Sharon Allison Office Manager City of Edina Public Works & Engineering 952 - 826 -0449 952 - 826 -0392 (Fax) sallison @ci.edina.mn.us * *New Address and Fax Number ** - Effective 7/26/10 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55349 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:41 AM To: Sharon Allison Subject: FW: Street Improvement No. BA: 358: Proposed Assessment Hi Sharon, Is this for you ? ??? Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: George Griffiths [mailto:gbgriffiths@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:30 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Street Improvement No. BA: 358: Proposed Assessment Being unable to attend the. Public Hearing scheduled for October 5, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. I am submitting the following for the record: 1. The original project estimate of $820,000 was assumed to include the necessary rework of the existing curb, and gutters on the Wooddale Avenue hill to properly direct the storm water drainage. We were told by a City of Edina official during a March, 2009, Public Hearing that the City of Edina knew of this problem and that necessary corrective actions were to be undertaken with this project. This never happened. During project work I was told by various on -site construction personnel that the drainage issue was being investigated but I never saw anything being done to address the problem. After project completion I was informed by City of Edina officials that the necessary rework would have required lowering the west side of Wooddale Avenue and raising the east side. It was never stated that physically this could not be done. I was informed, however, that no corrective action had ever been planned and that no money existed to do it. With the 40% "savings" this project will realize over the original estimate surely there was enough money to correct the poorly designed drainage and its effect on the corner of Wooddale Avenue and Dunham Drive. 2. Information presented during the March, 2009, Public Hearing stated that 89 full REU residences and 7 one third REU residences would be assessed. Please review the calculation of the Proposed Assessment amounts for each residence affected for accuracy. Thank you. George Griffiths 4444 Dunham Drive 952 - 922 -2744 1N A o Le ,o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF a $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER 0 lee To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.: III. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Change Order Edina Public Works Building — Improvement PW -1, Contract No. 4C: Site Concrete Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. North Country Concrete, Inc. NA RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: 1. NA NA GENERAL INFORMATION: This change order is for the site concrete for the new Public Works Building located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. Shortly after relocating to this location staff observed the need for sidewalks within the surrounding office / industrial area. Staff has observed many lunch time walkers as well as employees within this area walking to bus stops. Staff will continue to work on a master sidewalk plan for the surrounding office / industrial area. During the coordination of the landscaping for the project, staff realized that a sidewalk could still be incorporated into this project along West 74th Street and along Metro Boulevard. The landscaping was originally to include mowed grass (sod) for five feet adjacent to the curb line and then a no mow turf on the remainder of the site. The sidewalk would still incorporate a 5 -foot mowed grass boulevard and remaining site work would continue to be a no mow turf. The cost to install the concrete sidewalk is $30,875.00. This would bring the total change orders to date for this contract to 49,208.45; the original contract is $175,000. The overall budget, excluding the purchase of the property, was $14,400,000. The forecasted total project cost is currently at $14,300,000. Therefore, staff recommends constructing the sidewalk at this time. Public Works Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget John Wallin, Finance Director Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager _.. _.. ._ _...._' . _ '. _.._.. _ .. .. _...... ....... ._ ... ........... -... ,.. -.n. nn , ..� . i......, m w r n P.l.... PUI PIrL.J...nr PULL rr.nf, W^ er rin- a 'Yt . l v . �'' i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No IV. A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action F-1 Discussion 11 Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Amending Section 900 Edina Liquor Code ACTION REQUESTED: Consider granting second reading to Ordinance No. 2010 -15 Amending Section 900. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At their meeting September 21, 2010, the Council held a public hearing considering whether or not to amend Section 900 of Edina's City Code to allow more non - profit organizations apply for temporary on- sale intoxicating liquor licenses. Following discussion the Council made the following suggested revisions to the proposed code amendment: Subd. 3 Manager. The r„ nGil may require that the riGen6e.- premises shall be under the direct supervision of a manager approved by the Police Chief. In approving the qualifications of the manager, the Police Chief shall consider the manager's experience in overseeing the operation of an establishment that serves alcoholic beverages. Subd. 4 Police Protection. is Fequired by *he rr,,. -- I T_the applicant shall provide, at the applicant's expense, policing of the licensed premises by security personnel approved by the Police Chief. Subd. 5 Age of Servers. For a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, all persons engaged in the service of alcoholic beverages must be not less than 1824 years of age. Attorney Knutson has revised the proposed ordinance reflecting the Council's direction. Staff updated the Temporary On -Sale Application incorporating the ordinance revisions. Changes to the application are highlighted in yellow. Staff has also prepared a handout containing some recommendations for applicants information. ATTACHMENT: Educational Hand Out To Accompany Temp Intoxicating On -Sale Application Edina Application For Temporary Intoxicating Liquor License Draft Ordinance No. 2010 -15 HANDOUT FOR TEMPORARY ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICANTS If your organization provides alcoholic beverages at any of its events you need to manage that risk: First learn the liquor laws and regulations contained .in. Minnesota Statutes 340A, available at. https: / /www.revisor.mn.�ov /statutes / ?id =340A Also, make sure you have the appropriate insu'r'ance coverage. Last and perhaps most :important is to serve alcoholic beverages in a responsible manner to strive to minimize the-risk of a guest harming another orAhemselves. If your organization is providing and serving the liquor, here are additional precautions to take: ® Have'the "servers attend bartending training.and provide written direction; a Mandate servers not drink while on the job; o Consider the type.of alcoholic beverages to be served (alcohol content); a Avoid open bars as a means to limit consumption; a Control the serving size of drinks — don't serve beer in 32 oz cups; a Control the number of drinks a person can °have at one time (drink tickets); O Close the bar at least 30 to 60 minutes before the end of the event (Major League Baseball stops selling liquor after the 7th inning); a Serve food, preferably more than just hors d'oeuvres; a Offer nonalcoholic beverages; a No service to obviously intoxicated persons; O Check all ID's for people under age.30; a Provide ID checking guide for servers use; o Establish controls to prevent serving minors (wrist bracelets, hand stamps, .restricted areas); and a Arrange with a local transportation company to provide rides for impaired guests. License on behalf of: Add The Event: Location of Date of City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Phone: (952) 927 -8861 Fax: (952) 826 -0390 Street City Organization's Chief Executive Officer: Office Use Only Date Received Police Approval Notice of Hearing Published Council Approval Date Phone No: State Zip Time of Event: First Middle Last Date of Birth Organization's Treasurer: First Date of Birth Applicant Contact Person: Applicant Contact's Address: Middle Daytime Phone Number Signature Last Daytime Phone Number Signature one No Street City State Zip THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number or Social Security Number. This information may be used to deny issuance, renewal or transfer of your license if you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties or interest. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, the State of Minnesota Driver License Section, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, and Ramsey County Warrant Office. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. Your residence address and telephone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and telephone number. Please sign below to indicate that you have read this notice: Signature X 1 request that my residence address and telephone number be conic private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Number Date of Last Temporary License: No more than 4 licenses per organization per caiendar year. License must have at least 30 days between issue, dates. Location of Last Temporary License:. 1. Attach Manager's resume detailing experience in overseeing the operation of an establishment that serves alcoholic beverages. Name of Manager Phone Street City State Zip.. 2. Attach Security Personnel credentials. ;Security Provided By: Phone I Security Provider's Contact Address Street City State Zip 3. Attach a detailed drawing to scale with access' points of the "licensed premises" and proposed signage, (placement, exact dimensions, graphics and wording) shown. Proposed capacity of licensed premises: Barricade materials proposed: Location & number of access points to be used: Explain proposed security: The above- mentioned non - profit corporation or organization hereby applies for a Temporary Intoxicating Liquor License under., and pursuant to the Edina City Code with particular attention to Section 900, Subsection 900.13, Subd. 1 through 7, and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A. As per Edina City Code Subsection 900.04 Paragraph F, the above- mentioned applicant is qualified to apply for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. Attach documentation. The above- mentioned non - profit corporation or organization agrees to waive its Constitutional Rights against search and seizure. and will freely permit peace officers to inspect its premises and agrees to forfeiture of its license if found to have violated the Edina City Code or Minnesota Statutes providing for the granting of this license. I hereby solemnly swear that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of the Edina City Code and Minnesota Statutes under which this license is granted. Date of Application Subscribed and sworn before me this day of _ Notary Public Required documents: City of Edina application Signature of Officer Authorized to Sign For Organization Fee Documentation of non- profit corporation or organization Dept. of Revenue SP:C1 Workers' Compensation State Form #9079 (Complete Both Copies) Liquor Liability certificate (900.05 para C) Permit For Use of City Property (if applicable) Manager's Resume Security Credentials 20 SEAL Additional Conditions from City Council: License Fee: $200.00 Finance Code:. 1400.4132 ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING LIQUOR THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 900.04, Subparagraph F of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: F. Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - The City Council may issue to (1) a club or charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organization in existence for at least three years, (2) a political committee registered under Section 1 OA. 14, or (3) a State university, a temporary license for the on -sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the municipality sponsored by the licensee. The license may authorize the on -sale of intoxicating liquor and may authorize on -sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full -year on sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. The licenses are subject to the terms, including a license fee, imposed by the City. Licenses issued under this subdivision are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except Sections 340A.409 and 340A.504. subdivision 3. paragraph (d), and those laws and ordinances which by their nature are not applicable. Licenses under this subdivision are not valid unless first approved by the Commissioner of Public Safe ty. nermit6 the on sale e Gnone•ored by pertain eFganizatieRs. Not more than two such licenses shall be issued to the same organization or corporation or location in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issued for not more than three consecutive days. The city Co„nnil ma„ reStrint o„nh linen o to the sale of 3.2 nernent malt liquor, malt intoxicating alt Iiq GF or urine only. Section 2. Subsection 900.08, Subparagraph L of the Edina City Code is deleted: Section 3. Subsection 900.09, Subdivision 1c and Subdivision 6 of the Edina City Code are amended to provide as follows: 1 C. Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study accredited by the State. A location which holds a license under this Section shall not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of worship - �- -- Section 3. Subsection 900.09, Subdivision 1c and Subdivision 6 of the Edina City Code are amended to provide as follows: 1 C. Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study accredited by the State. A location which holds a license under this Section shall not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of worship or school that was newly located in its proximity after license issuance. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to Temporary On -Sale 3.2-Percent Malt Liquor Licenses or Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses. Subd. 6 Temporary Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, not more than four Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses L i�6 shall be issued for any one location in a calendar year with at least 30 days between issue dates. For purposes of this paragraph, "location" shall mean a physical location within 1,000 feet or the perimeter of the premises first licensed in the calendar year. Section 4. Subsection 900.13 subdivisions 3, 4, and 5 of the Edina City Code are amended to provide as follows: Subd. 3 Manager. The G^URG61 may r ;Dire that the IiGence.± premises shall be under the direct supervision of a manager approved by the Police Chief. In approving the qualifications of the manager, the Police Chief shall consider the manager's experience in overseeing the operation of an establishment that . serves alcoholic beverages. Subd. 4 Police Protection. if reqUiFed by the GewnGfl-, -jthe applicant shall provide, at the applicant's expense, policing of the licensed premises by security personnel approved by the Police Chief. Subd. 5 Age of Servers. For a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, all persons engaged in the service of alcoholic beverages must be not less than 18.24 years of age. Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 01 fl AfTi Vu •r �: REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL n Agenda Item Item No. IV. B. From: John Keprios, Directo Park and Recreation Dep rtment a Action ® Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Discussion ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the Council discuss a preferred process by which to engage public testimony on the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and determine the Park Board's involvement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Staff recommends that the Park Board make a recommendation at their Tuesday, October 12, 2010 Park Board meeting. Staff further recommends that the City Council host a Public Hearing at future Council meeting using the Park Board's recommendation as a basis for the Public Hearing at a date that is acceptable to the Council, as it may be premature to assume that the Park Board can come to a final recommendation at their October 12th meeting. The Park Board has been actively involved in the public process regarding the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in that they have attended open houses, been present during presentations of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet findings, and have had representation on the Community Assessment Team work session and the Bike Edina Task Force meetings. The Park Board has been provided all community input on the issue (over 270 emails, letters and petitions) and several have walked the proposed routes on their own time. They are well informed on the issue and prepared to make recommendations at their October 12th meeting. 81kit REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.0 From: Jeff Long Chief of Police ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: October 5 , 2010 Subject: Resolution No.2010 -86 Authorizing Safe & Sober Grant Agreement ACTION REQUESTED: Resolve that Edina Police Department be authorized to administer a grant from the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety to achieve traffic safety objectives. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Edina Police Department, along with the police departments from MSP International Airport and City of Richfield, have worked in a consortium since 1997 as grant partners in Minnesota's Safe and Sober Campaign. Last year, the three grant agency partners received $48,000, divided equally, to conduct traffic safety enforcement saturations in the three jurisdictions. This year, the three - agency consortium has been approved for a $55,000 grant, pending approval and formal resolution by each agency's governing council. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Draft copy RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -86 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT SAFE AND SOBER GRANT WHEREAS, the City of Edina Police Department has chosen to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety, for the project entitled, SAFE AND SOBER COMMUNITIES during the period from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Chief of the Edina Police Department is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Edina Police Department and to be the fiscal agent and administrator of the grant. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby declares its commitment to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety for the project entitled, SAFE AND SOBER COMMUNITIES. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the SAFE AND SOBER COMMUNITIES grant be effective during the period October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2013. Adopted this 5th day of October, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2010. ofte REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.D From: Wayne Houle, PE ® Action City Engineer Discussion Information Date: October 5,-2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -94 restricting parking along West 58th Street from France to Xerxes ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -94 for parking restrictions on West 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the September 21, 2010 Council Meeting staff presented a traffic report for West 58th Street between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. The report reviewed the current speeds, volumes and regulatory signage of the corridor and made short and long term recommendations. The City Council directed staff to go forward with the short term recommendation, which adds bike lanes along 58th Street. This provides a narrower corridor for pedestrians to cross and also allows a drop in the speed limit from 30 -mph to 25 -mph. Due to the limited width of the roadway, parking on both sides of 58th Street would have to be removed in order to install the bike lanes. G:\Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Studies \Traffic Stud ies\58th_Chowen \Item IV.D_RR_No Parking on 58th street.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -94 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON WEST 58TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVENUE TO XERXES AVENUE City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the addition of bike lanes along West 58th Street from France Avenue (County Road 17) to Xerxes Avenue (County Road 31); and WHEREAS, this improvement do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed improvements on a Municipal State Aid Street must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of West 58th Street, east of France Avenue (County Road 17) to the City border at Xerxes Avenue (County Road 31). Dated: October 5, 2010 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 12010. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 ow Le v � � , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.E From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -95 Revising speed France to Xerxes limit on West 58th Street from ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -95 reducing the from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue speed limit to 25 mph on West 58th Street INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the September 21, 2010 Council Meeting staff presented a traffic report for West 58th Street between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. The report reviewed the current speeds, volumes and regulatory signage of the corridor and made short and long term recommendations. The City Council directed staff to go forward with the short term recommendation, which adds bike lanes along 58th Street. This provides a narrower corridor for pedestrians to cross and also allows a drop in the speed limit from 30 -mph to 25 -mph. Minnesota State Statute establishes a speed limit of 25 mph for streets with marked and signed bike lanes. The speed limit on West 58th Street would be reduced from 30 mph to 25 mph and signed and striped accordingly. g:\ engineering \infrastructure\streets \traffic \studies \traffic studies \58th_chowen \item iv.e rr 25mph speed limit on 58th street.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -95 REDUCING THE SPEED LIMIT ON T 58TH STREET BETWEEN FRANCE AVENUE AND XERXES AVENUE City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council requested Staff to review the West 58th Street corridor at the May 18, 2010 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to implement bike lanes along the corridor at the September 21, 2010 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, State Statute 160.263 subd. 4 establishes a speed limit of 25 mph for streets with established bike lanes; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, authorizes -the resigning of the speed limit signs on West 58th Street between France Avenue (County Road 17) and Xerxes Avenue (County Road 31) from 30 mph to 25 mph. Dated: October 5, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 r� O Le REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. W.F.I. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Set Hearing (10/19/2010) Planning Items: Final Development Plan, Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy, 6905 York Avenue ACTION REQUESTED: Set hearing date for October 19, 2010. IN FORMATION/BACKGROUND: Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting Final Development Plan approval to build a 14,492 square foot retail store with drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: See attached: Staff report and plans. o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator, Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 29, 2010 2008- 004.10a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND This item was continued by the Planning Commission at the May 26, 2010 meeting. (See the attached May 26 staff report; and minutes from the meeting on pages A22 —A28.) Primary concern of the Planning Commission was in regard to the site plan, drive through, pedestrian and automobile circulation. The applicant has revised the plans to attempt to address those concerns. (See attached plans and pages A5 —A10.) Project Description Velmeir Companies on behalf of'CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 14,492 square foot retail store with a drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. (See location on pages Al A4 and the revised narrative and plans on pages A5 A10.) In 2008, a Final Development Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the retail building, and from 20 feet to 5 feet for the parking lot were granted. The two retail buildings totaled 18,000 square feet in size. The previous plan approval also included a 114 -unit, four story apartment building on the site, that has been constructed as phase 1 of the site project. (See previously approved plan for the site on page A11 and the approving resolution on pages Al2 —A14.) The proposed plan for phase 2, or the retail portion, is now proposed to be amended, is generally consistent with the previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls'for one 14,492 square foot building, rather than two buildings totalling 18,000 square feet. 2. The proposed plan calls for a drive - through facility. A condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive - through facilities. (See the approving resolution on pages A22 —A24.) The request now before the Planning Commission is for a revised Final Development Plan. The Planning Commission previously considered the variances as part of the review in May. It was thought at that time that the variances needed to be reconsidered because the site plan had expired. However, because the apartment complex was built in 2009, the site plan and variances have not expired. The variances are still valid, and the proposed plans are consistent with the previously approved variances. As noted on the approving resolution, the variances are conditioned upon approval of the Final Development Plan. (See original resolution approving the project and variances on pages Al2- A14.) Therefore, a revised Final Development Plan is the only request. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Key Cadillac; zoned and guided commercial. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Walgreens, Clean N Press Cleaners, Kids Hair and two medical clinics; zoned and guided commercial. Westerly: The Westin hotel, condominiums and parking garage; zoned and guided commercial. Existing Site Features The subject property is 3.7 acres in size and contains a new 114 -unit four story apartment building. The site is relatively flat. (See pages A3 —A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Final Development Plan Review Commercial PCD -3, Planned Commercial District Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial use. The proposed uses (pharmacy and drive- through window) are permitted within the PCD -3 zoning district, which this property is designated. Therefore, the 2 proposed uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The buildings would be brought up closer to the street than what standard zoning would allow, to encourage a pedestrian friendly environment along the street. Additional landscaping, benches and pedestrian areas have been added in these areas. Two walkway connections would be created from the apartment building. A pergola system is proposed over a portion of the sidewalk within the parking lot. (See page A5.) This is also consistent with principles of the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan, A Preliminary Development Plan is only required for a property requested to be rezoned. No rezoning is requested. The plan is generally consistent with the previously approved Final Development Plan for the site, with the exception of the drive- through facility, which was previously prohibited. (See page A23.) A drive - through facility is a permitted use in PCD -3 zoning district, which this property is zoned. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the previous Final Development Plan to allow a drive - through facility c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract, The single -story retail building with a drive - through would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use; The applicant is proposing a 14,492 square feet of retail, where 18,000 square feet was previously approved. The proposal would increase green space on the site, and meets the floor area ratio requirement; therefore, staff believes the proposal is appropriate for this site. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study with the attached May 26, 2010 staff report pages A27 —A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes study with the attached May 26, 2010 staff report pages on pages A71 —A2.) t) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code, and �3 The proposal conforms with all Zoning Ordinance requirements and to the approved variances on the site. , g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and has provided comment on page A10a. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site, as there are no off -site pond expansions available. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking Based on the square footage of the building, 89 parking stalls are required. The site plans show 89 parking stalls, including three stalls that are proposed for proof of parking. Should these stalls be needed in the future, they could be added. A proof -of- parking agreement could be made a condition of approval. Building Design The retail space would be built of brick and large windows. (See pages A4a- A4b.) The entrance to the store has been located to face York Avenue, as was required of the previously proposed retail space. A pergola has been added to break up the mass of the building. An additional false front has been created right at the corner of 69th and York to appear as an entrance to the store. Landscaping The landscape plan has been designed to match the previously approved plan, which was part of an overall plan contemplated for the site. (See pages A7 A8.) Green space and landscaping would be increased from the previous two office buildings with large surface parking lots that previously existed on the site. (See page Al 1.) E Compliance Table * Variances already approved City Standard Proposed Front — York Avenue 35 feet 20 feet* Side Street — 69th Street 35 feet 20 feet* 83 feet Side — South 0 197 feet Rear — West 0 Building Height 4 stories or 1 stories and 28 feet 50 feet, whichever is less Floor Area Ratio 100% 96% total both sites 19% subject site Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 15 feet* setback Parking Stalls 89 89 Drive - Through Stacking 5 spaces per bay 5 spaces Over -story Trees 44 required 85 total (number is based on the 25 on the subject site perimeter of the entire development site) * Variances already approved Primary Issues i Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: The proposed uses are permitted in the PCD -3 District. Retail space /drug store and a drive - through window is a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district. With the exception of the canopy, the drive- through would meet all the city's minimum requirements for drive - through's including stacking space, stacking location and setback. 2. The project would encourage an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The main entrance to the building would be off York Avenue, from the existing sidewalk along York. In addition to the existing sidewalks around the perimeter of the site, an east -west sidewalk with a pergola system over a portion of it would be added to connect the apartment building, and provide safer movement through the parking lot. Smaller walkways, pedestrian areas with benches, and landscaping would be added between the building and York and 69tH 3. The retail building has been shifted up to the street in an attempt to screen the parking from the roadway and encourage pedestrian movement. 4. The proposal is consistent with the approved variances for the site, and is consistent with applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. • Would the existing roadways support the project? Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study with the attached May 26, 2010 staff report pages A27 —A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A71— A72.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan at 6905 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy. Approval is based on the following findings: 3 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped September 15, 2010. 2) Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5) Submit a copy of the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6) Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7) Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated September 24, 2010. 8) Execution of a proof -of- parking agreement. Deadline for a city decision: December 31, 2010 7 CRY of Edft-Ta PED:290232434GO23 320159th St Ird Edina, [Li-9 55433 Log..d Highlighted F..t.. City Limits Cn.k. Lakes Parks P.—I. E il .- k:: CRY of Edhaa j • •b62G 6]00 712 nil I f 3201 6901 Std! - <t Edirne, HVI 55433 700E 1 —T LogDnd -- Hlghlightt0 Fantum IAMSG NumhaE Lab. h M-1 Nome L.Ws C—U. LDko NDmes Clahes C� Parks zoDlDg t:y ILrnarec =PriE 0-1 r7 L110.:IG1" l D J:Pasnl DtirJ © ciDD -Elnc Dc,bcra: DivCJ © c:DD- ilaryDrsarD��l H �: CaaavcnD- :21Z— PCD - :16c .C.nasoao= OKD.f(P—Cc .s D'j mD-EPCaC Conaaq. Do --) DP.2 IFb.. bd.. -...,. Drl. I—1 lf�� .:-0- 1 ow.- D --) CLD2 tlStaC Ofl =Dit�l 0.:D- 11�aC0.�alm Dtir�) ixD] IFL,C DrJ mfa D�1 PDO <IP'. =nC fisyaL'-!Di>r�l © NylelPb dDOv Dural O X1fiF= Du•«CU.a) ILD Wcj— >,er�D�J )-1 P—I i 4/ rn � t ,,'c_� 's � r t•� a .. S N, is I_ city of Edina PXD: 290282434 0025 3201 69th st vu HN 55435 Logond Hwcs Numtrar �hzlz 94001 N0m0 1a621s ,./ Clty Umiti: ,w Cr .h. UU0 Nsmms C uh.s EjP.,ts F -I Parcels 2009 A-i.] Ph0}0 l PXD: 290282434 0025 3201 69th st vu HN 55435 Logond Hwcs Numtrar �hzlz 94001 N0m0 1a621s ,./ Clty Umiti: ,w Cr .h. UU0 Nsmms C uh.s EjP.,ts F -I Parcels 2009 A-i.] Ph0}0 K� oM�.,�.� y- — — f•� EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEWLE UL YYIIFN aNlAYI M Gl. N6 Gtw YYR f � ® . © DS nY we1Q YR4 LA aIDlr U �� ffi eIOCYw 1 w ron nsa a Yonr, vr-ru n ' _ • .. � . .. � O w10{ al@ n( wLL wn 4w4n1 M 1® ftlIwIM9R11161K r m Y,rw m ra Yu wee a C7° uwr �� Yw� rYn w wra —RAW !1�• -. - ____ _ �' © Il,lf emYYY wa[ »Nrl1R WAw1 j FLLA h ji - © nle LwpIY1 ffi R6 ffi ffi0 �' YY4ffi YIlw11Y O air wmwr<YYw ffi!BS yw�W LEGEND (J7 O sY"rw�a em v,Ga raver W Z Z H WEST ELEVATION -YORK AVENUE SOUTH sm; Ur . r-r NORTH ELEVATION - WEST 69TH STREET SCMF: Y,• . V -0• r EAST ELEVATION amr.w+on �rVr U 1 � Q Z 1—I W 00 I�,��r%1678a`p 00 M N SSA o+ V7 fir® VEL HEIR COMPANIES Po,M.n In Development RENDERING FROM THE CORNER OF YORK AVENUE AND WEST 69TH Zx- n R �f VELIVIEIR —'£i rrsrnr sssssr esss�- .- - — nssa.rsan. COMPANIES ~a Partners M 0.volopmenl O cn W Z Z", Q , Z H W 00 00 In O t� 09.13.2010 WEST 69TH STREET 0 .nrl�cm� ro omrwrz nur u-nm¢ N¢ urcnl. wrw wort art oar I1� —T (/�� rl �e.rz srrem o�uome SR 1 Brf UMINOUS SPEED HUMP r.r. rrr- rya war.- .a-s tireq man.. u.r_us m.`..ar_uw ara. -am vl..aw =m r..a..r• +..r.r .. aw.mru�w • �M. rt��rww rww�r... +...rrr _ r.rr.r+rr.r..m r.ray. r rr parq - •+r+r.w.rrw�m..rsr�.ow.a..rr u Ow+..r r.rwrrrr..r�r.r err r �arrr. e ..— orrrrrmey.rr.wrkrwrq aw..a � � N z � 22 40 /} 6N'INJ MT sg ® Gopher State One Call ma nor. ��rrr -m HFAW OUIY BINMP1016 6RORALL9@TU-11 oe. �twe 7 O O DO — ®0 4 M —«— vrv�yry� maw- =�SnO STE PI AN Loucks Project No 06416 0 F " R6wiE� CANdStAPE IAN _ �� wMnwNnroR��aa�tir�aawu ANDSCAPE PLAN: T=TIM WEST 69THSTREET cvs/ 7 -------- --- ---- AGUENTRAKa ----- ... YORK AVENUE SOUTH - --------- - -- - -- WEST 69TH SrRffr im cvscs a zw roMrortt -:49L mmuesm �4 —H cr" 0 W- 3 4 4 VELMEM L COMPANIES PC PROPOSED cvs so I, TYPE A - 13.013 s1. 95*-Io" X 137'-6 89 STALLS REQUIRED 86 STALLS PROVIDED + 3 PROOF D ronmolmulwomrerwwua /77V PERENNIAL RANTING issvLmoisaru DEODUOUSTREMANrING DETAIL -..am S_LHRU!�ANTINGDETAIL I a n d ac:tlV a Ea r m s• wlwlauPMraa LANDSCAPE PLAN: GENERAL NOT R....Eu.. �TREES ` rtf CoNomomI Tee BY OT WEST 69TH STREET BY OTHE R ALL V45PW ANDSCAPE DETAILS: II II1 —L . Ir DEPmoAxtOAM CUT BACK WIVE BA9FT .,�� .iI RANEINGSOB.- SEESRQ REMOVE ALL [LAGwro A m LABELNG PROMTREL 111 —JI—I WRAC o PLACE B�ACKFU VARIES ROC[ MULCH -SEE SR6. IN, Ir LETS AND SATURATE Sm WI[11 WATER. DONw COMPACT MORE IWW TIC CONmK7w E REpcN r� SEE am .l E' Dm PANNTANNGALT®NAPLUMB POSMON T[BOUGN THE WARRANTY I I LANDSCAPE FABRIC -SEE SRC 2 PERENNIAL PLANTING Pm= THEE STALER POSRIONED EOUNLT A®UND 111E iR[EAR RVA%LO. TREE Vw TO anti BRAN[N }� � EDGER -SEE WES. -,�, �wrsruRESG A�usraDwOlw M�a -�Dm- LsEt EDGE VARIES -SEE PLAN PRUNE 0AAVOW AFTER P MwGO 6COMPLETE. II II1 —L . Ir DEPmoAxtOAM CUT BACK WIVE BA9FT .,�� .iI RANEINGSOB.- SEESRQ REMOVE ALL [LAGwro A m LABELNG PROMTREL 111 —JI—I WRAC o PLACE B�ACKFU I� — I I= I — I—I Ir —I I POCISEN TERIALPWDR ' ''�II1 =�Jr TO PIANDNG 1Q IN, Ir LETS AND SATURATE Sm WI[11 WATER. DONw COMPACT MORE IWW NKESSARr TO MAINTAN PL WRL IG' POLVPROPYLIM OR KXTETMnDd STRAP 2 PERENNIAL PLANTING TREE Vw TO anti BRAN[N "A v.... yf.I•a ...- sArLnRAWNG•ONE PER wBE LOOSENS NROOTS OF ALL M�a -�Dm- LsEt CONTAINERIZED R.hn REFER TO PLAN SCABBY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF IB•MIN. HOLE KOM TO PLANTING � WOOD STAW W SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONWNER SrIS RUSH [OT.i vARIES- sEC PLAN WITH GRACE. OF MLlCHEO DEEP- RoaMUla- rDEe- sEESPEC I a n d s c a e f o r m sR NAP To PLANTING LANDSCAPE FABRIC -SEE SRC _ n:� LET PLANT ON UNOSTLmem PLATIVE SIVL \ EDGING MATERIAL - SEE SPEC [0N[RAaoe u R[9ammmE r EDGE VARIES -REFER •�~ `°'°�°�i4 TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PI®ro PLA Q NOTmuNUSCAPEAROIRMT ��� IMIEOIAIFLY V Pow ORAU+A[2 EEBTS. ./ . I 4 \ ARCATA BENCH DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL f �; ; _ r BUILDING WALL M "3 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL L1-T sc cYf.ro Cp�AS APB kg ptp1� WEST 69TH STREET e, B7B - — - r I / �e � a iaa,\ / /ate i a Re sa sr" l !� O r ®O OD v e p v � ti e . C cv e.�MIIIMI s ms moa w — ® Gopher State One Call a ms iii.— �sss -uu *if%#i�d 64A 0#+rG KAU J BMW DARAN� SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH .m WEST 697H 57REEf M61rrSV CvS STO@eS1Y CMOFEDM MENN MCOUM.MN VELPMIR eo NrAnles SF,�Te4 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ,m.r.a. hocks Project No 06416 GRADING. DRAINAGE b EROSION OONIROE NOTES .yam . r arm. r e.r.n s+a� unr r r 'a~ :��•^w .r+r rwa.. �.wrr +.rsrr wr °.a.�rwmm ra.sWrT sr +r..rsrr•aa�ri.+�a�m.s�iam .a rd rrm:°°awar... "� �rr.. •�••i�r:swwr°i a. �.rmrs ir�.~ir i.aor m r�i r�ru�ee sr� rm� ar.rn r.yr / /ate i a Re sa sr" l !� O r ®O OD v e p v � ti e . C cv e.�MIIIMI s ms moa w — ® Gopher State One Call a ms iii.— �sss -uu *if%#i�d 64A 0#+rG KAU J BMW DARAN� SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH .m WEST 697H 57REEf M61rrSV CvS STO@eS1Y CMOFEDM MENN MCOUM.MN VELPMIR eo NrAnles SF,�Te4 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ,m.r.a. hocks Project No 06416 I WEST 897H STREET rol I w =I nroa ®wm �°, mna rm r nm mN¢.mmem —No— In Y �a l I a S9g E N Nx alNmim -,e PROPOSED M ' CVS I� m - a TYPE A - 13.013 sf. 96' -10" X 137' -6" 89 STALLS REQUIRED .. 86 STALLS PROVIDED + 3 PROOFw 10� F UTMM PAN GENERAL NOTES rr�i .. e'.� w sib••r"r�.nuwrrMwr .�. ary r b ewr. O wTr ,r .w.re e"rs.'�i 01LM�rw rs YY>ai Rein x ��' e�1 n.. r. b e..d sec.. r eeM1 "RI r16 � mN ¢ .le_ r.bF r.1 � b n..�r ■ uu r�s �br Wm ee. r r-T. rs. m� b. r I.Ar+w •crab.. � r r.b. • eN � Y SM. a _ r e� � w��iean. I.Ir � rwr.. iir.r ..+ w•or. rrrwiw. nA�r r Yr.� Ie.IM1 re, m1a srn: m uu m — _. — a r.1 � ^erg rwr+. rr.• �� w rbd rr.+ r w mm +viur..w. 0.r.q. E.nw.l Val w ea um■ .(est2) er L I.lem.ln Pv Gb . =Bdl. 0 O fNY M 20P ..e0oe p ■ �AFpn.himl. Lpmlha� al =• �11 IMepsne N P. — y_l e(Jr Q,jvN R m � iaN� 57101 N..(a" N -1) .::imI 1 Pm fYM m m.a I F / %iRANSFORYER 11ppm' 1. L-11l .1 ~ 4' 16f r rm a mnl,el�m� .y, rw Pm. i j m Br13 i_ un 1■rc rlmiLYL e� ■ >m I I I I iL i y .r e in 1 UTMM PAN GENERAL NOTES rr�i .. e'.� w sib••r"r�.nuwrrMwr .�. ary r b ewr. O wTr ,r .w.re e"rs.'�i 01LM�rw rs YY>ai Rein x ��' e�1 n.. r. b e..d sec.. r eeM1 "RI r16 � mN ¢ .le_ r.bF r.1 � b n..�r ■ uu r�s �br Wm ee. r r-T. rs. m� b. r I.Ar+w •crab.. � r r.b. • eN � Y SM. a _ r e� � w��iean. I.Ir � rwr.. iir.r ..+ w•or. rrrwiw. nA�r r Yr.� Ie.IM1 re, m1a srn: m uu m — _. — a r.1 � ^erg rwr+. rr.• �� w rbd rr.+ r w mm +viur..w. 0.r.q. E.nw.l Val w ea um■ .(est2) er L I.lem.ln Pv Gb . =Bdl. 0 O M 20P ..e0oe p ■ �AFpn.himl. Lpmlha� al =• �11 IMepsne N P. — y_l e(Jr Q,jvN R m 57101 N..(a" N -1) .::imI 0,..(8603 E -x) Pm fYM m m.a mvc 1w TmN -pru 5Tm1 --- m Br13 CVSD phmmmy C0® RKIR OZTRNla YORK AVENUE SOUTH V45T 69TH STREET cvscsoszm CYS STORE I 57 ♦ L' LAl. IR COM /ANTE! ASSOCIATES C0 CIAO 5 ts g wmc g nm � un NORM - JeL mivwwM 0� �20 40 G= of FECIr 1 PLAN ® wo ep m Gophes er 5tate One Call Loucks Project No 06416 Q ti! S& C4 -1 v *r I very ft, Ak e cc MEMORANDUM — Plan Review �� °•, ,� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: September 24, 2010 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed CVS Pharmacy West 69th Street and York Avenue South Engineering has re- reviewed plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and minutes. O A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. O A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. Sheet — C4 -1 Utility Plan: 1. Indicate "Private" on all internal utilities such as the sanitary sewer lines, watermain lines, and storm sewer lines. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEng1neering\Genera1\60 - 69 Streels\3101 West 69th Street Developement\2010 CVSVapprovals\20100924 review of CVS.docx kok j Edna, Minnesdio RESOLUTION NO. 200 ® -55 kPPR®VBNG A FINAL DEVELOPMENT ��B�N� ® A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 3101-3201 WEST 69TH City of Mina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1.' BACKGROUND. 1.01 DJR Architects on behalf of Tom Miller are is requestin a th Final two office b Plan ldingston these Variances and a Conditional Use Permit to tear down e sites and build two buildings containing retail space that would total 18,000 square feet, and a 114 -unit, 4 -story apartment building at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. 1.02 The following Variances are requested: 1. Retail building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street. 2. Apartment building setback variances from 54 feet to 35 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street. 3. A parking lot setback variance from 20 to 5 feet. 4. A building height variance from 50 feet to 54 feet for the apartments. 1.03 On May 28, 2008, the Planning Commission (4 -3 -1) recommended approval of the requests. 1.04 On June 5, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variance. Staff appealed the decision in order for the PCity sand Variance. k final action on the Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2. The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of a the dd str eltscac elenvi onmentgthat can provide future pedestrian pedestrian an P connections. c. The building height e and oning Ordnance for the apartments are now that now requires the (building because of the recent 9 height to be measured from existing grade. i a S52 -927 -8861 ctiy HaH FAX 952 -826 -0390 -4sni WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 -826 -0379 ,.,.., ,- i;.,nfarli na _com RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 2 d. The proposed height and setbacks have not changed from the original plans. However the building is now over 50 tall when measuring from existing grade rather than proposed grade, therefore, the setback requirement increases from 35 feet to 54 feet. e. If the project were built as a traditional strip mall with parking in front of the building, all setbacks would be met. f. The proposal enhances the entrance to the street. g. The variance for the parking setback would provide parking close to the storefront entrances, similar to parallel or on- street parking in front of stores. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan with the requested Variances and the Conditional Use Permit to allow housing at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. Approval is subject to the following .Conditions: Approval of the final development plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: o Site plan dated June 9, 2008. o Grading plan dated April 28, 2008. o Landscaping plan dated June 9, 2008. o Building elevations dated April 28, 'and June 9, 2008 o Roof plan dated June 9, 2008 2. The following must be submitted to the City before the City issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval b. Record the resolution with the county. 3. The property owner was responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 5. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2008. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. A developer's agreement was required for public water main installation along West 69th Street and Xerxes Avenue, and for the sanitary sewer along West 69th Street. 9. Two surface parking spaces in front of the apartments must be eliminated to meet the required parking space setback from West 69th Street. 10. Bike storage must be provided to meet City Code. 11. No drive - through window access allowed for the retail buildings. ` 12. Fifty percent (50 %) of the retail users in the building that faces York Avenue must have doors that have public access openings to the street. �3 RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 3 13. The project will be built according to the final plans and specifications and with materials as presented at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 17, 2008. ATTEST: A Debra A. Mange , Cit Jerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1✓-2tday of a4z 2008. U ity C rk 2 %#Vw 4-b Akaw bow 4m ic 4ow :00 1 WJ Up 4af R E N D E R I N G 4 F R O M T H E C O R N E R OF Y 0 R K A V E N U E A N D W E S T 6 9 T H C) L/) LU 7M LU co VELMEIR COMPANIES WEST ELEVATION - Y 0 R K AVENUE 50U111 EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ewa nawr. mr cn en mns..n 1. II.w. e mmi c —m -mac 1 NORTH ELEVATION - WESI 691H �)IItttI EAST ELEVATION SME: 111' • 1' -0' o� LEGEND u LLJ "( ,I �� , NpR . 711111 11 ul- f,id `YlE1Lx w1[1f� COMPANIES L y VELMEEIR COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Intended Use of the Property Velmeir Companies History Velmeir Companies and its client, CVS Pharmacy, have entered into a ground lease with York Place West, LLC for the site known as 6905 York Avenue South. It is the intention of Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy to construct a 13,000 square foot retail store, with a drive through facility, on this site. The development would also include 90 customer parking stalls and a loading/unloading lane at the rear of the store. Velmeir Companies is requesting an upgraded curb cut on York Avenue, a new curb cut on West 69h Street [both of which would be right turn in -right turn out uses] and a modification of the full access curb cut presently existing on West 69th Street. Velmeir Companies is a Michigan corporation with offices also located in Florida, Washington, DC in addition to its Minnesota office located at 7201 West 78th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota. The company has been in the development business for. approximately 10 years. It is the preferred developer for CVS Pharmacy in the State of Minnesota and has constructed approximately 35 stores in the greater Twin Cities area. In addition, it has constructed CVS sites, and other developments, in a number of states. VELM EIR COMPAMES EXPLANATION OF PLANNED COMN ERCIAL DISTRICT MCDEKCATEONS Velmeir Companies, the Proponent, is proposing to develop the site identified as 6905 York Avenue South, Edina, Nluuiesota, as a fall service CVS Pharmacy store. The site is presently undeveloped. Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy have entered into a ground lease with the property owner, York Place West, LLC. The entire site encompasses 69,499 square feet (1.60 acres) while the store building will occupy 13,013 square feet. The site is presently zoned as a planned commercial district (PCD -3). The zoning will remain as a PCD -3 site. The site is subject to a developer's agreement dated August 27, 2008 and the City of Edina's Resolution No. 2008 -55. This Resolution sets forth a number of conditions which must be met by the Developer. Item No. 11 in the Resolution prohibits a drive through facility on this site. The Proponent is requesting that the prohibition of a drive through facility be removed as a condition since all PCD sites permit a drive through facility as an accessory use under City Ordinance 850.16. The Proponent is also requesting a confirmation of the Resolution requirement that the building setbacks from both York Avenue South and West 69h Street be 20 feet rather than the standard 35 feet to achieve a "downtown" look to the site, i.e., the building will sit closer to the public sidewalks. This placement of the building will also enhance the parking facilities. The Proponent has requested that Hennepin County approve the curb cut modification on York Avenue with a larger right turn in/right turn out only configuration. The Proponent is also requesting a new right turn out egress from its requested drive through facility and a modification of the existing full access curb cut at the rear of the site which also services the apartment building. The Proponent is providing for the handling of the storm water runoff from the site via a development at the rear of the site. Parking will be provided by 90 stalls. The City's ordinance calls for 80 stalls. These stalls will be larger than the required minimum size. In summary, the Proponent is requesting: 1. the removal of the restriction against a drive through facility; 2. the confirmation of the variance set forth in Resolution 2008 -55 which provided that the building pad would be set back 20 feet from York Avenue South and West 69`h Street rattier than the usual 35 feet; 3. the development of a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on West 69`h Street); Lk t. LIL-t WW& —47 L Air— 4&L jrA-T ........... L L '7 lclli- & S rm 71 Z RIM F; Z m r I WTI BIKE RACK mi P. L It BENCH Ilk 60-TH STREET I L RIWI HAIIG GS52767 SEC 69TH STREET W AND YORK AVENUE S EDINA, MINNESOTA VELMEIR CO-A-5 7 N"'Psir. M -------- 'L-.gsjLmA ---- KE P E D E STRI AlN A cc[ss ROUTS WJ '� tF BENCHBENC1_1 rE—LI., PED[5TRIAN EXHIBIT 04IZ2/2010 W PEDESTRIAN EXH1131: ' WEST 69TH STREET NORTH p 20 4p SONS W FrUr -- —1 M R 19 7 wr Q �4 a V pitev 1OVs s fit 1411N L �I I co • MEMORANDUM Plan ReV0061W NGIh CE <i G DEPARTMENT F_NT ITl` OF EMNA DATE: . May 20, 201 a TO: Cary Teague o City Nannep � FROM: Wayne Houpe — Director of P ubflc Works 1 City Ear Meep SUBJECT: Proposed CVS �rqeat 69th Street and York Avenue South Engineering has re- reviewed plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. • All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet — C2 -1 Site Plan: 1. Access onto York Avenue will require approval from Hennepin County. If Hennepin County allows a right -in / right -out then a sign shall be placed at the Stop Sign stating "No Access to West Sound W. 69th St" 2. Move sidewalk along York Avenue to have a minimum of 5 -foot sodded boulevard. 3. Keep all drive isles at minimum of 24 -ft (revise drive isle just east of dumpster). Expand heavy duty pavement areas to entire perimeter drive isles. 4. Use standard City of Edina curb detail when curbs are adjacent to sidewalks. Sheet — C3 -1 Grading and Drainage Plan & C4 -1 Utility Plan: 1. Note "Private" on plan for all utilities including sanitary sewer, storm sewers and water mains. This is the first re- review of these plans. Staff-will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks G:%Engineedng1Genera1\60 - 69 Streets13201 West 69th Street Developement1112106 review of York Place.doc MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, May 26,2010,7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mike Fischer, Jeff Carpenter, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiel, Arlene Forrest and Karwehn Kata STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the April 28, 2010, Planning Commission meeting were filed with a correction. 11. NEW BUSINESS: 2008.0004.10a Final Development Plan Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy 6905 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 13,000 square foot retail store with a drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. Planner Teague reported in 2008, a Final Development Plan was approved for the site to build two retail buildings that totaled 18,000 square feet in size. The proposed plan is generally consistent with the previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls for one 13,000 square foot building, rather than two buildings totalling 18,000 square feet. 2. The proposed plan calls for a drive - through facility. A condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive- through facilities. The request requires a revised Final Development Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the principal building and pi Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 2 from 35 feet to 31 feet for the canopy. The 20 -foot setback variances requested were also approved as part of the previously approved plan. Planner Teague delivered a power point report concluding that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan with Variances at 6905 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances fora Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. 3) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian connections c. The unique circumstance is the sites prominent location in close proximity to Southdale and the Galleria shopping areas. The city would like to encourage a more pedestrian environment in this area. d. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setbacks; however, it would encourage parking in front of the building as parking stalls would be lost in the rear if the building met required setbacks. Approval of the Final Development Plan and variances are subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped April 23, 2010. 2) A final landscape plan must be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4) Submit a copy of the (Vine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 0z Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 3 5) Submit a copy of the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6) Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7) Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 20, 2010. Appearing for the Applicant Gordon Johnson, Kevin McGee and Michael Spack representing CVS. Discussion Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague if the proposal requires a rezoning. Planner Teague responded that the site is zoned PCD -3; no change in zoning designation is required. Commissioner Kata asked Planner Teague if the parking count includes the adjacent parking for the apartment complex. Planner Teague responded that the apartment is self - parked. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague if there are cross - easements between the apartment complex and the CVS site. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Gordon Johnson, 3600 American Boulevard addressed the Commission and informed them in today's market drug stores require a drive - through window to remain competitive. Johnson pointed out that drive - through windows are a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district. Continuing, Johnson said that directional signage will be incorporated into the site to control traffic. Concluding, Johnson acknowledged that everyone appreciates the 50th & France Avenue streetscape, adding that in working closely with City staff they believe the proposed building placement creates a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere on this corner. Kevin McGee, 7201 78th Street West, told the Commission CVS Pharmacy is proposing to construct a 13,000 square foot retail store, with drive - through facility. The project includes 90 customer parking stalls and a loading /unloading lane at the rear of the store. CVS also has a ground lease with the York West apartments directly to its east. The apartment complex was part of the original approved plan with the subject site earmarked for multi- tenant retail development. Mr. McGee said CVS is requesting the following: 1. Removal of the restriction against a drive - through facility; this condition was for the previous' development of the site. A a� Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 4 2. Retain the variance approving a 20 foot setback from York Ave and 69th Street. This variance was approved with the previous request to create a pedestrian feel. 3. Allow a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on 69th St West). Discussion Commissioner Grabiel in response to a comment from Mr. Johnson on the need for a drive - through pointed out that both Target and Cub Foods operate a pharmacy without a drive - through. Mr. McGee acknowledged that fact; however, he pointed out those stores are not strictly drug stores like a CVS is. Continuing, McGee said many people use drug stores with the drive - through option when they are sick or physically are not able to come into a store for one reason or another. McGee said their market research indicates that a drive - through window was key in the success of a drug store /pharmacy. Commissioner Risser asked Mr. McGee the speed at which people drop off /pick up their prescriptions, pointing out vehicles are idling as they wait. Risser suggested asking customers to turn off their engines while waiting. McGee responded they have found that at most two vehicles are stacked waiting to drop off /pick up their prescription(s). McGee said the "stops" are usually very quick. McGee noted rarely would someone drop off and wait for their prescription to be filled. Concluding, McGee said CVS can consider the "engine off' suggestion. Commissioner Risser asked Mr. McGee if their market study took into consideration that there is a Walgreens Drug Store directly adjacent to this site. McGee responded that CVS came into the Minnesota market roughly a few years ago and the market studies indicated there was room for competition. He acknowledged he doesn't know if the market study considered a drug store in such close proximity to a site. Concluding, McGee said in retail it's always location, location, location. Chair Fischer noted that on the schematics two "entrances" are illustrated; however, they appear different. Mr. McGee agreed, adding there is a "false entrance" at the corner of West 69th Street/York Avenue with the main entrance angled at the southwest corner of the building. The "doors" match but are different with the entrance off the parking lot. Chair Fischer asked Mr. McGee if the CVS drug stores are always built at the height depicted, adding he thinks the building is a bit too tall. Mr. McGee responded the buildings are proposed at this height to screen the mechanical. Chair Fischer asked if storm water tanks will be underground. McGee said the storm water system was installed to the rear of the site with the apartment complex. Public Comments Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Vivian Bauman, 6913 Xerxes Avenue, Richfield told the Commission she lives across from the new apartment building and since it's been constructed she has lost her Az g-- k Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 5 sunlight and experienced an increase in traffic on Xerxes Avenue. Ms. Bauman reported that presently 800 + vehicles use Xerxes Avenue, adding she wants to make sure that traffic directional signs on the proposed CVS site do not direct traffic onto Xerxes Avenue. Ms. Bauman said she is also worried about on street parking if parking is'compromised on the apartment and CVS site. Concluding, Ms. Bauman stated Xerxes Avenue already bears an incredible traffic burden and this proposal will only add to that. Chair Fischer asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue. Being none, Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion A discussion ensued on traffic flow, turn lanes, internal traffic circulation and the potential for traffic to spill onto Xerxes Avenue. Mr. McGee said signage is proposed to deter patrons from using Xerxes Avenue. Mr. Johnson added that vehicles going south on York Avenue can turn left on West 69th Street to access the site. Commissioner Forrest noted vehicles also have the option of a right turn onto 69th Street, and that option coupled with the right turn only for the drive - through would direct traffic to Xerxes. Commissioner Forrest said when approval was given to the previous project traffic flow onto Xerxes Avenue was an important consideration. Commissioner Brown stated as proposed he cannot support the project. Brown said that in his opinion the internal traffic circulation on the site just doesn't work. Brown pointed out the site has multiple access points creating cross traffic especially because of the location of the drive - through; Brown said he has no problem with the variances that allow building placement up to the street; however, the internal vehicle circulation and drive - through location as designed is unsafe. Commissioner Forrest said she agrees with Commissioner Brown reiterating that in her opinion right turn only for the drive - through would only funnel traffic back to Xerxes Avenue. Commissioner Forrest said she also has a concern with pedestrian patterns in the parking lot. Mr. Spack told the Commission that in working with City staff on orienting the building closer to York and 69th streets impacted where the drive - through could be located. Continuing, Mr. Spack noted the exit onto West 69th Street allows both right and left hand turns. Mr. Spack said they are requesting that Hennepin County allow them to improve the curb cut on York Avenue with a larger right turn in /right turn out only configuration. A discussion ensued on building placement and if the proposed location of the building actually creates a pedestrian friendly atmosphere or would pulling the building back into the site is better. Commissioners acknowledged the goal of creating a more pedestrian Aa6 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 6 A friendly streetscape, questioning if this plan actually does that. It was noted that the facade along York Avenue while being close to the street doesn't achieve that goal. The majority of patrons would park in the parking lot and use the door on the south elevation. It was acknowledged that the previous plan was for multiple tenants not one. Action /further Discussion Commissioner Brown moved denial of 2008.0004.10a Final Development Plan for CVS Pharmacy. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. Planner Teague requested that the Commission issue findings to support the denial, or have the applicant revise the plan. Planner Teague said the Commission has to be cognizant of the 60 -day rule. Mr. McGee said CVS would be willing to table their request with some direction from the Commission, especially with drive- through placement. Commissioner Brown reiterated that in his opinion the current location of the drive - through in the middle of the site just doesn't work. Brown suggested a north /south configuration. Mr. McGee responded if the drive - through is relocated north /south with a York Avenue exit the passenger side would face the drive -up window, not the driver's side; which is the ideal situation. Commissioner Carpenter acknowledged it appears the location of the drive - through is the stumbling block, adding the original goal was to achieve a pedestrian friendly site; however, the fagade at the street doesn't accomplish that goal. Commissioner Grabiel stated it may be possible to position the building in the southeast corner of the site. He added pedestrians do walk/cross etc. into parking lots all the time to enter /exit buildings. Chair Fischer briefly explained to the applicant the history of the site and the vision the Planning Commission had for this corner. Fischer commented at this point the Commission may have to give up on their vision of "pedestrian friendliness" and review a typical development plan. Fischer acknowledged that the proponent did make efforts to create a more pedestrian friendly fagade; however, in his opinion those efforts fell short. Fischer concluded that the proponent could bring back either scenario for review. Commissioner Risser said she believes this site is a bit tricky for redevelopment. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague what happens with a denial. Planner Teague said if the Commission denies the request the proponent could proceed with. the request to the City Council for a vote or they could take time to review their options and bring a revised plan back to the Planning Commission. �J-� Ai Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 7 Commissioner Staunton said the Commission should accord the applicant flexibility and allow them to decide if they want the proposal continued or denied. Mr. McGee responded that CVS would like the Commission to continue their request for Final Development Plan approval to the next meeting of the Commission. Commissioner Brown withdrew his motion. Commissioner Carpenter withdrew his second. Commissioner Staunton moved to continue item 2008.0004.10a to the June 30, 2010, Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion, noting the applicant is agreeable to the continuance. All voted aye; motion carried. III. COMMUNITY COMMENT: Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place, addressed the Commission and said she was interested in the continuing process of revising the Zoning Code and asked how one could participate. Chair Fischer explained that once a month the Planning Commission holds a work session to discuss topics. Chair Fischer said the public is welcome to attend all sessions, adding they are held the 2 "d Wednesday of each month in the Council Chambers. Chair Fischer also suggested if anyone is interested in the re -write process to also sign up for City Extra which posts all meetings. Ms. Hoganson asked if the Commission was familiar with the latest Three Rivers 9 -Mile Creek bike trail plan and that process. Chair Fischer responded that he isn't familiar with the plan or the process and asked Planner Teague if he was aware of the plan. Planner Teague responded that he believes Three Rivers is spearheading the project and directed Ms. Hoganson to contact the Park and Recreations Director, John Keprios for further information. Susan Clark, 5812 61St Street West asked the steps developers take to seek approval from the Nine Mile creek watershed district. Ms. Clark said it appears to her that the watershed district hears a proposal after the City process in complete. Ms. Clark commented that in her opinion it would be better if the Planning Commission had "in hand" the watershed district input before they made their decision on a project. Planner Teague responded that it appears the policy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is to hear an item after it has been through the City approval process, adding there wouldn't be an application if the project wasn't approved by the City. Chair Fischer commented that it appears there is no best answer. A at 0 In rJ � .by Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 26, 2010 2008-004.1 Oa Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 13,000 square foot retail store with a drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. (See location on pages A1—A5 and the narrative and plans on pages A6—A21 a.) In 2008, a Final Development Plan was approved for the site to build two retail buildings that totaled 18,000 square feet in size. (See previously approved plan for the site on page A25 and the approving resolution on pages A22— A24.) The proposed plan is generally consistent with the previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls for one 13,000 square foot building, rather than two buildings totalling 18,000 square feet. 2. The proposed plan calls for a drive - through facility. A condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive - through facilities. (See the approving resolution on pages A22— A24.) The request requires a revised Final Development Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the principal building and from 35 feet to 31 feet for the canopy. The 20 -foot setback variances requested were also approved as part of the previously approved plan. (Seepage A25.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Key Cadillac; zoned and guided commercial. Easterly: Single - family homes in the City of Richfield. W_ The single -story retail building with a drive - through would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; The applicant is proposing a 13,000 square feet of retail, where 16,000 square feet was previously approved. The proposal would increase green space on the site, and meets the floor area ratio requirement; therefore, staff believes the proposal is appropriate for this site. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study on pages A27 —A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A71 —A2.) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and With the exception of the variances, the proposal conforms to the zoning ordinances. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and has provided comment on page A26. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site, as there are no off -site pond expansions available. A (Vine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Larking Based on the square footage of the building, 60 parking stalls are required. The site plans show 90 parking stalls. Building Design The retail space would be built of brick and large windows. (See attached development plans and page Al3 —Al4.) The entrance to the store has been Primary Issues ® is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: The proposed uses are permitted in the PCD -3 District. Retail space /drug store and a drive - through window is a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district. With the exception of the canopy, the drive - through would meet all the city's minimum requirements for drive- through's including stacking space, stacking location and setback. 2. The project would encourage pedestrian movement. The proposal encourages pedestrian movement to and from the site by providing a large sidewalk along York Avenue and 69th Street. There would also be a pedestrian connection from the apartments. (See pages A15 and A25.) The sidewalk shown along York Avenue would have to be reconfigured per the comments of the city engineer. (See page A26.) A green space separation between the York Avenue and the side walk would have to be provided. 3. The retail building has been shifted up to the street in an attempt to screen the parking from the roadway and encourage pedestrian movement. 4. With the exception of the variances, the project would meet all zoning ordinance requirements. ® Would the existing roadways support the project? Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study on pages A27 A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A71— A72.) O Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: 5 4 j City of Edina 71 va bor,- �v3 Rim 7 1 PID:2902824340025 320169th St W Edina, MN 55435 Lojpnd House Number Lt-l- Strout NoM Lmbals City urnits C"ks lake No... Lzh.s L. Parks Parcels 2009 Aerial Phat- 11111•• _. __ _{ . nrI■ - - --1- - =1 -_ _ _ -� � -- -_ - i City of Edina :111:; : __C =1■.. �. i uq:mm °_ _ C_==== �'.'. '.: °' __ oil nu nr \ li CC C � \flu �f -= � 7_: L:.: __ __ ■_np ! �: G= �= .0 C_ C �- nnnnuull = C %.� ♦� 111 �+ .�. iq �1 i � - J��- _= = -_' 11111 :C . aV: �=' ::C � �� i■bla■p1■11■■ G /a, ♦♦ �� p♦ � -1 -• 4 j �'� ��• I/� c =_ __ — VIII :7 ■ID��p �� :C -- GG — i1.1.11..,1.. ■; - tt` .. �1 = ee :: rv/ -. -1� �_ =_ : � _ r ■r::.:_ e:_ :e_ e_ plod um �{ ♦ ♦♦n • T■ iai ni ■n :C C: GIB �\ _ -! ° 111111111 � '� • C ._ __ -- -_ -. ■ -_ il�� :1• dH °' ii ii ii Bin 111 � �� :�11 � ■ ■1� .� .. ' �� a :: -i ' II,u �IpU■ m1A�s i� 11�. C C �� .: \���� � __ ■_ ■� ■ ■■pia �__ -`S a Emm rim 11111`1 -_ _ _ -i .t ii :: u —•: ■r. -- ����� -�• ■1: Y Seel \� %� i'. __ • :I Rip � � i�11 � ■ivy � _ter �iij / /,lfli r�i �i r..� na►1 �I.� �. ii ii C �� Iq�l�� r / / /ttri: �7 : �.Ii_ ie�4.•��� �� :• �� q� � ���:0� ♦ ♦��f yi I. 4j rII gOy1 ►��:: � rii•4.rn1r :- i �: � ::: �,♦ �: I�1 II►��y��ifi1 \O �S � �•ir•r•rul.■ -_ ��� III: GC :::::.:: .��1� � �W ��i�gnp��♦ / /�unu :: _— I■■■■■unI nllq C �tu �� �� r�rplla��♦ 1�1. ■nn..:. ■n Lnnn111 Illlullt\ ism % Us 1111 a IfI p anon :■1 1119 _ a■rl rir. � =1 III.. �� _•_�— r � _ �,��,� �ib� •ii i111111� � iii. ri..ir ::: :: �aaaaat• i ��. nn11b1.lt7�_ `rq � qp 4.ih% � C: :: Li •�- � �� ■ ` ��r :. :: �_ • ■.IIIII■I _::: _fir IN ,,�_�■ •. ►'- .n111.1UI 1-11..1 �i,IIl111i� 1i_F' ■ 1111 2 ` 1■ 1��� R ►► aaalpr' 1�1���` _�; .':• :�11• ...11117 � � 1 «���= mill: ���� ►' :�� J . 3) Wou§d the variance after .Me essen &§ ChBrracgsr OF the neighborhood? No. The proposed one -story retail building with sidewalks along ,the street . would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Recommend that.the City Council approve the -final Development Plan with, - Variances at 6005 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy. Approval is based on tke* following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. 3) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian.connections c. The unique circumstance is the sites prominent location in close proximity. to Southdale and the Galleria shopping areas. The city would . like to encourage a more pedestrian environment in. this area. d. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setbacks; however, it would encourage parking in front of the building as parking stalls would be lost in the rear if the building met required setbacks. Approval of the Final Development Plan and variances are subject to the following conditions: 1,) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: 7 VFLWIR COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Intended Use of the Property Velmeir Companies History Velmeir Companies and its client, CVS Pharmacy, have entered into a ground lease with York Place West, LLC for the site known as 6905 York Avenue South. It is the intention of Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy to construct a 13,000 square foot retail store, with a drive through facility, on this site. The development would also include 90 customer parking stalls and a loading/unloading lane at the rear of the store. Velmeir Companies is requesting an upgraded curb cut on York Avenue, a new curb cut on West 69th Street [both of which would be right turn in -right tam out uses] and a modification of the full access curb cut presently existing on West 69ffi Street. Velmeir Companies is a Michigan corporation with offices also located in Florida, Washington, DC in addition to its Minnesota office located at 7201 West 78`h Street, Bloomington, Minnesota. The company has been in the development business for approximately 10 years. It is the preferred developer for CVS Pharmacy in the State of Minnesota and has constructed approximately 35 stores in the greater Twin Cities area. In addition, it has constructed CVS sites, and other developments, in a number of states. VELMEIR COMPANIES EXPLANATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTS Velmeir Companies, the Proponent, is proposing to develop the site identified as 6905 York Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, as a full service CVS Pharmacy store. The site is presently undeveloped. Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy have entered into a ground lease with the property owner, York Place West, LLC. The entire site encompasses 69,499 square feet (1.60 acres) while the store building will occupy 13,013 square feet. The site is presently zoned as a planned commercial district (PCD -3). The zoning will remain as a PCD -3 site. The site is subject to a developer's agreement dated August 27, 2008 and the City of Edina's Resolution No. 2008 -55. This Resolution sets forth a number of conditions which must be met by the Developer. Item No. 11 in the Resolution prohibits a drive through facility on this site. The Proponent is requesting that the prohibition of a drive through facility be removed as a condition since all PCD sites permit a drive through facility as an accessory use under City Ordinance 850.16. The Proponent is also requesting a confirmation of the Resolution requirement that the building setbacks from both York Avenue South and West 69th Street be 20 feet rather than the standard 35 feet to achieve a "downtown" look to the site, i.e., the building will sit closer to the public sidewalks. This placement of the building will also enhance the parking facilities. The Proponent has requested that Hennepin County permit it to improve the curb cut on York Avenue with a larger right turn inhight turn out only configuratibq., `-iL, Proponent is also requesting a new right turn out egress from its requested drive 6rough 5 facility and a modification of the existing full access curb cut at the rear of the, site which also services the apartment building. The Proponent is providing for the handling of the storm water runoff from the site via a development at the rear of the site. ` Parking will be provided by 90 stalls. The City's ordinance calls for 8'0 stalls. These stalls will be larger than the required minimum size. In summary, the Proponent is requesting: 1. the removal of the restriction against a drive through facility; 2. the confirmation of the variance set forth in Resolution 2008 -55 which provided that the building pad would be set back 20 feet from York Avenue South and West 69th Street rather than the usual 35 feet; 3. the development of a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on West 69th Street); 1 VELMEIR COMPANIES VARIANCE APPLICATION The following responses are provided in explanation of the Minnesota Statutes and City of Edina Ordinance requirements regarding variance requests: The Proposed Variances will relieve an undue hardship which were not self-imposed or a mere inconvenience: Resolution 2008 -55, adopted on June 17, 2008, in Section 3 thereof, imposed Condition #11 on the property, namely that there shall be no drive- through window access for any retail building developed on the site. Edina Ordinance 850.16 (Planned Commercial Districts) in subdivision 7 permits drive through facilities in a PCD -1 site and, in subdivision 9 all accessory uses permitted in PCD -1 sites are also permitted uses in PCD -3 sites. The restriction in Resolution 2008 -55 was imposed upon the site by the City of Edina to "control" the use of the site until such time as an actual development proposal was presented to the City. The Proponent requests that a variance be granted to permit the construction of a drive through facility in accordance with the plans presented herein. Resolution 2008 -55 also modified the retail building setbacks from both York Avenue South and West 69th Street from 35 feet to 20 feet to provide an active streetscape appearance for the site. These reduced setbacks need to be maintained in the current proposal because they will enhance the location of the parking stalls as well as enhancing the traffic flow through the site. The proposed traffic pattern planned for the site will direct the majority of the automobiles visiting the site to exit onto West 69h Street, thus relieving some of the automobile pressure currently seen on York Avenue South. The Proposed Variances will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. As stated above, the drive through facility variance will remove the restriction against drive through facilities on this site and provide treatment for this site which is comparable with other sites in a PCD -3 setting. The modification of the normal setback requirements will provide parking close to the store front in a manner comparable to on- street parking in front of stores. The Proposed Variances will preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. The drive through facilities variance being requested will provide Ahis site with the same property right found in other PCD sites within the City of Edina.. 1 - t � 4 ir•' = >�i Yyr I , ` t ` _ t.. 17GS5 767 ....I cam. �SEC67 %0TH STREET •r _ -- .__ _ 69TH STREET a � AND _ Y 77. y YORK AVENUES . ' 'mac..: . ' � F r G i .. `�.� • Ii Eo. MINNESOTA - ��!.�; it Ir�y i ,�• .- .' 1. f. a •¢ 1 - _ , ' t VELMEIR LL- ' ` } t r ' • t `'` AssocIATES rrff - t.-. f rk —f,1. A,a. A � blia RACK : /FJENCHFS .. 1. \\�n -L.-. � �< • -- 9TH S #REST k. -fit✓ ../A ✓' 'v i * ' r :L RACK PEDESTRIAN' EXHIBIT n +rxvxuto — PEDESTRIAN EXHIM WEST ELEVATION — Y 0 R K A V E N U L SUUIh soul 1/1' . 1' -0" EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE iRRf K RY RILL LLR411 rRO _ .. -- N O R T H E L E V A T I O N — W t J I u y I n ) I I( C C i Holm EAST ELEVATION W KPIw< LEND Lo .I NPfj� l LAJ Z 79 f H COMPANIES Lo I `r 'i 1 ` 1 i c .I NPfj� l V� ATELMEIR COMPANIES I `r 'i 1 ` 1 i c U21ft='-Z f SURVEY LEGEND •� ��`�� .. 0❑ u m Rvmnm 0 xrmwn _ avR6 ,�� 5 ' vry Yllllu • E IL1n = ^= u • u ¢ arm ' — w= urmlPpmM uAm NORTH n o NammR. —•�_ nouns �--°- SCALE m FEET ---� -' EXISTING CONDITIONS n ©cwcvncw,c cu PLAN Gopher State One Call TREE Loucks Project No 01111 m � PPPaw laa a� C1 -1 L- r v GENERAL NOTES s0 `LJ 1z1 /% C � 1. Thia E+lalrrg fsMllinm Plan war prtryM b/a lkN airveY bPlaska AaQbin aM rtwdudlNYdnwbrga 1 ry, �yy�l�l�l� � ' prtpaiM mn IM1e CM d FORM S. We have drown burlM aruclurn aM Mdnin Pn araVm DIRED KIGM UN NCE nerving the aNeblM1e ben Plm,blliry, smiedbde 6[C IPlwwing nmklbx YORK AVENUE SOUTH �- a, unllnvpnlan da.am ivn,war,q rcgmdbNSan r�NemlNVagN the eAnkr v,none Clll,ervia fb WEST 69TH STREET -stuff nM.B]R.I IwuM,ry PnPwn xM1U mw b. Thane uilM npman lwt dv regvd. dim adllm CK CS a6]]6] �Inw(RL29) IPCne.ervla.Imm mein w.:a r „<b Ine iwnrnrr CV66TORE PS /M _ , R• Wwlermoin On Cil• — 1 -1 -1' mutlme Pr bcilirY- iM1eY[mHnllmeregmnrt p(wan Mnallalion, DUl an awae meh lurhdicrim�l( MOT [OINA ] IIFNNEPIN CDUN,Y, MN a pdran wrvice lP an adlPlnY, worm lhN SAb, � —, -- i.; ,mice olbia allecmra an,dp4rer. NriuY rel4 - la• PCP uverguw� lac apenlenwRlnd wA weh'pinle• VVA k6dric<rnan e 9rww aM lce cwWNiona during Mrnn mnnM wM_ V Elll1WRJL` RR - F q rDrOahnDle Lp Dbwae ahenve aidble wNmce Pla bwlM wOCIDrt COMPANIES Lhdcryround I� �T- �_1fPncM1 nrev,l aUI1M. d.. Map Pw —BTU,—, ehhw alnq..ina rkN `O "I.'i RCP Ioollenwlnlleu of wcM1aburoM1 art wryPRm Fucevnre w ncmcFnie. nrin - -Sluff a he aurlace fealPm aM ekrn"nn Jw,mmrM1h �� 0 -: rl/r�SSOCIAT�S q?elm -9]al IF were lacalMhY Inw(R60.5 E -W) '�77 RRY Wnar¢INeu All of the undngrwnd m0lry lnrom.nbnaM bulim f. All ArV Inw B56.J ( ) abairNJ lim the cline eel lM1e CNYdEOINn a...r.' •-`^•+ i - -Ruff rend _6n= ].J g. EL,PEMEUUDON MUACED NRCISEDROOREAN PIACE THiWT 72:11( Inw B]I.I(w) REOINEAn nif REDICCIMS TO REEORC GOPHE4Y0UMNPALLATDRYIAW NOURSITOP11ERNCEAT NEUELATLFA6T ae N0uR51N ADVANCE Ai h61 /aHUml. :. � JRNn=R]].e U21ft='-Z f SURVEY LEGEND •� ��`�� .. 0❑ u m Rvmnm 0 xrmwn _ avR6 ,�� 5 ' vry Yllllu • E IL1n = ^= u • u ¢ arm ' — w= urmlPpmM uAm NORTH n o NammR. —•�_ nouns �--°- SCALE m FEET ---� -' EXISTING CONDITIONS n ©cwcvncw,c cu PLAN Gopher State One Call TREE Loucks Project No 01111 m � PPPaw laa a� C1 -1 L- r WEST 69TH STREET N SULZ IN PELT cw«rmr m Gopher State One Call _ _ T SRE PIAN OENERILL NOTE �� r... '~ ns ���•m en • �r. �aw�..rr' rr. r w 1. s�.+���1� �• �wlm .�°C Pr ...+r ...r..w +...,,.+ +ems rmr IIFAYY pl/11.r,UWrAUS �onAn s,EErc..n p HUNGER OEIM°NG STILLLT IVIfI°1 MTP p.a 7. AO 0® e o w c. a C D Ps. 7 RD RIQIT OYIRIINCE SEC YORKAVENUESOUTH V,m G9TH STREET CwCS.STE6l CVS STORE .5795 CM 95 EOMA NENNEAI000NIY.MN qEL� COMPANIES e ASSOCIATES pu- -UL r i SITE PLAN Loucks Project No 06416 C2 -1 It D-- I 1. I I` I .J l` Si4LT¢T[ vAVI 1`/ I ".O1• I , r FINEST 99TH STREET ,L rT / 1• —! n" �v ALP A" till �1 1 1 I. j Qy y Htl TYPE A— 13 3T 1. 96• —lo- x i3r- 80 STALLS REOUIR 90 STALLS PROVIDdYt, rTE -01650 ■� I / /// ■I 1 "0 1 �JfN//I �Il Iozlo,��Ia N06111 SCALE' IN � Fll nrvL[ TN w Y� Gopher State One Call � �a�R:��LN�.SmLmT WARNING: THE COMPACTOR SDULLL U R[SLONLRLE FOR CALLING [OR LOCATIONS CR ALL FiISTINC UILLIOES TMY SHNI COOPERAIL WNN ALL UTWTY COAV•AMTS IN AWNTANINO THGL S[LV61 AND /OL II[LLIGTRN OE OWLS THECOMPACTORSMALL CONTACT MR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LL ATR51- .SOUND IA LEAST"n LS.CONNA ,MS. NIANN[LS. VALVES OF ER URGRDUND STRIC'CAn15.COLERIG.ISrti ALANNTRACTOR LL RIPMOUR EP STRUCTURES RENO GEU IM C[1MRACTORSHALLT1 CW TDR THE MOV[ NNEN UAMAC[U UURING CONSTPUCTION AT NO COST TO IMF OwN[M. SILT j CE RE10REO NDUN AN TENCL` .v..v mom ®fin cNvn� ILmn ¢I c_._IN wn ,e I I �' ° •,.,.. m•Pr.R .w,nwvmm ®.,...mN...s..am •N.IwrN • •�""_�• f�:�, R. -OvunPYlrt. �IIO P QlOtra vlslOO \� 1 r E . �R.v.vw ::y= CVS/ AffinmCY 11DWEQ0 RW ENTMNCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 697H STREET M CS PSIMD CVS STORE P SDRS OTTOFEDNA P� �MNMPNCOUNR,M�N VELMEIR COMPANIES WPM— EROSION CONTROL PLAN ISWPPP) Loucks Project No 06416 0 -2 I VTR . •� �� 4 �o..�i�n � ®TLTgm +"•` = • l�r �mgrr TL rtmssw w TR m[ a nFU®. Lucas R.L r� C1°.nw —"�E%^ N°1pw:a�.:�n mvmnnc muN. _I —� =— D DOL�mFasL wT - n vsnDRn mr R vmvta caw n S nmc va .• alY • O .._ }�� • ��[• R. W IOQ�[fC mot �m � melLlCls LOgn - Ilr,mlw wRILiL �' • � N ii un ® � � ILLn qm .mnm unsiu m.m�iolam ®IOa / I .. _ °r:nr@.,•°'u •••l .ma.®L..' a — i5 i — .. •: � n mnm wiR n. ei me ,mrt can R m ®L..mu..m I[sL Lv.lr nn va Loa:momna "rtl •I I _ __ Jj I — n " "�.,' l Rlm gero m¢LOm,s ®wa oms ®rues Icalw Tm sR.,m��.w.� u vc mmn qn 'wmm.q m ".C' e �� . � ° °b.n,°wn°'°�ieAl °orr oo�i w nt•� ra.q aAEML�I���w I® nwrvlm ®1"� m..w mu,lw. s m wo. m�'I.kla o. L � .cam w llL..ly Igae mR rvgl m Lw.. q qLY : q�.N... wLimlP�4h mm" I.I.. I I �' ° •,.,.. m•Pr.R .w,nwvmm ®.,...mN...s..am •N.IwrN • •�""_�• f�:�, R. -OvunPYlrt. �IIO P QlOtra vlslOO \� 1 r E . �R.v.vw ::y= CVS/ AffinmCY 11DWEQ0 RW ENTMNCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 697H STREET M CS PSIMD CVS STORE P SDRS OTTOFEDNA P� �MNMPNCOUNR,M�N VELMEIR COMPANIES WPM— EROSION CONTROL PLAN ISWPPP) Loucks Project No 06416 0 -2 I L1�n eMEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN F -1P I/r - P-P STORE AREA CALCULATIONS . r r RVA aIDx Tova nm[ arA a v. lmlumuT Aau my ®l law u. I®vc aau mluw.mr NrA rmNVm nv u. ml v. ORM TNMI i a == I® m 1 FLOOR PLAN F-IP W I'- w• -r 0— A r 6167 vs ,157 /A �I111L4111 UUUL41 `V'� 650 NDRO� LM WEA-SWO-WHAND Som om D BO SEC TOM AVL 5911111 Y 69M ST. mu - ®1A mE ,T11BHM DEVEI.OPEM HNSL1 ZA 'LDaER VELMEIR C D M P A N I E S Rwmw x mwam+r nr yYrw • C@15ULTAN7: sex: ° vamRt amoxv mnm u a mar¢ M ROr rmm 1® IIO aAR Im "[ m R 0010. Ymmlt Imn m 01mY.rl ID R rmnrrri aaai�B. ISSUES: 0A- 20 -z010 ,1 lov CK Rpt YANA4DE R.DFSUDEN ' tgAiiR POISMEW n 11 -03 -2009 C-552767 PRELIMINARY 0 MERCHANDISE PLAN NTACt NM'JACf MELCHERT 9�1 IOII�R OACT PI10NE:101.T79A924 NTAR OMLJ—NrAmlD — F-1 P 'Mw'mIIOT MREASM m 4915TIIIICOON r COSMETIC VERSIONS: r, °_°-I ^ "ITTCO OEPARTMCNIS: TTCAT_ONLT PROI[CT: NEW 11ubr vu -re[mos vu m N/A CROUP ME NOTES: ry Ia7aR maiw¢n trAWO 1=1 PHARMACY NOTES: s m ®� N/A w mm� Fxaaan m+ot ra msT u eO9LN elQeu mou mqy 1"' - OI R! _1 wHwnw ucr A N/A N/ N/A ImmlAml x+O IA WILL lo- uflmt r.a 1 vw ra lamvo ea Y� •nma ®mml ®Imoaa ®nmem a_a.aa rs mu¢n ®1 � •• -.n�•m � m� B �°or� ®svm�m oaaw m� mme ®� a•^/a nw�i �I Irs+l �w r,� w °°m o®i nm as r.TfnORT ADOOIONS °mRm�m "a iTJI I eTOUT COORDINATOR � aau® r.m nu uu IDC � � p mAAR Ao ®v +m® rd+l n-M IX- GORE PS- PEPSI a- OLACEAU na�.laSUnmsrl/r f -.m 10m Ar rrmmeu mwx nM m m rarx mm 9ma[ oac a ax vme maa rw 9v1 au ¢ m °� m�oo y m rm mm M R®usee rurma 10 uuua¢ auuR usaa r r.mm .m mr- �_p1W v. aaasar a)m Iel Im Ir -r (D� Nl a� ID NR 1Y OTMaIR mvlml m[vma ao U- y_t K -Y aY -Y A ID -r m' -Y 1Y -Y r -Y K -Y -Y Ifa� •j' muxw¢uww[ _.. -^.... I� lXmvlomw.m r+vm:m°s mw wv ...` eMEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN F -1P I/r - P-P STORE AREA CALCULATIONS . r r RVA aIDx Tova nm[ arA a v. lmlumuT Aau my ®l law u. I®vc aau mluw.mr NrA rmNVm nv u. ml v. ORM TNMI i a == I® m 1 FLOOR PLAN F-IP W I'- w• -r 0— A r 6167 vs ,157 /A �I111L4111 UUUL41 `V'� 650 NDRO� LM WEA-SWO-WHAND Som om D BO SEC TOM AVL 5911111 Y 69M ST. mu - ®1A mE ,T11BHM DEVEI.OPEM HNSL1 ZA 'LDaER VELMEIR C D M P A N I E S Rwmw x mwam+r nr yYrw • C@15ULTAN7: sex: ° vamRt amoxv mnm u a mar¢ M ROr rmm 1® IIO aAR Im "[ m R 0010. Ymmlt Imn m 01mY.rl ID R rmnrrri aaai�B. ISSUES: 0A- 20 -z010 ,1 lov CK Rpt YANA4DE R.DFSUDEN ' tgAiiR POISMEW n 11 -03 -2009 C-552767 PRELIMINARY 0 MERCHANDISE PLAN NTACt NM'JACf MELCHERT 9�1 IOII�R OACT PI10NE:101.T79A924 NTAR OMLJ—NrAmlD — F-1 P 'Mw'mIIOT MREASM m 4915TIIIICOON r W RESOLUTION NO. 2008-55 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 31013201 WEST 69TH STREET City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1.' BACKGROUND. 1.01 DJR Architects on behalf of Tom Miller are is requesting a Final Development Plan with Variances and a Conditional Use Permit to tear down the existing two office buildings on these sites and build two buildings containing retail space that would total 18,000 square feet, and a 114 -unit, 4 -story apartment building at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. 1.02 The following Variances are requested: 1. Retail building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street. 2. Apartment building setback variances from 54 feet to 35 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street. 3. A parking lot setback variance from 20 to 5 feet. 4. A building height variance from 50 feet to 54 feet for the apartments. 1.03 On May 28, 2008, the Planning Commission (4 -3 -1) recommended approval of the requests. 1.04 On June 5, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variance. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2. The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian connections. c. The building height and setback variances for the apartments are now required because of the recent Zoning Ordinance amendment that now requires the building height to be measured from existing grade. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedi na.coni 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952- 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 Id_ RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 3 13. The project will be built according to the final plans and specifications and with materials as presented at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Adopted by the. city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 17, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mande , Cit Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby, certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this f day of a&hz 12008. U l- R ity Clgrk :Edina, Minnesota Spack a .}1+Y C NV � F f, "Op M t 53 N ftWll;.l : btl, SI leI �L, W. •,"o t' wee (fi ,� �� �(I y4.�} a %� •' a �� '�`t t �'F� - � �1'�• � i. t. I((l � N BJIn9 Y" - t Ai°S i.: C' IN € C?:ir•.i DI rre s q'' n•rnc �? � • _ `i 1- ��(4-k � A `ir� Traffic Impact Study CVS Pharmacy Edina, MN ' I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnessotta.. By:�%� li' •� �� Mic ael P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: May 14, 2010 ie M roductton aiid Surinam ptfr1loaa of ? eport aad Sf idyy Objectives CVS Pharmacy is proposing to build an approximately 13,013 square foot pharmacy on the vacant southeast quadrant of York Avenue South and West 69th Street in Edina, MN. The existing 114 unit York Place apartment building east of the proposed development will share the surface parking lot with CVS Pharmacy. The purpose of this report is to determine if the proposed pharmacy will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system in the near term and to recommend mitigation measures if necessary. The study objectives are: i. Document how the adjacent existing transportation system operates. ii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate in 2011 if there is no development. iii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate in 2011 with full development of the site. iv. Recommend improvements if needed. b. Executive Summary The development is proposed to contain a 13,013 square foot pharmacy with two drive -thru windows and 90 parking stalls. The eastern edge of the parking lot will have an additional 17 parking stalls owned by the York Place apartment building adjacent to the east side of the site. After the pharmacy is built, the apartment building and pharmacy will share the expanded lot and use the same driveways. The pharmacy is anticipated to be fully operational by 2011. The scope of this traffic study follows the City of Edina's 7 ranspottation Impact Analysis Initiation and Review Policy. Based on discussions with City of Edina staff, the following intersections are analyzed in this study: i. York Avenue /ExistinM northbound Right -in /Right -out driveway south of 69t Street (the driveway is currently blocked with a fence) — Intersection 1 ii. York Avenue /69th Street — Intersection 2 iii. 69th Street/Proposed eastbound Right -out intersection which aligns closely with the Key Cadillac westbound Right - in /Right -out driveway on the north side of 69th Street — Intersection 3 iv. 69th Street/Existing full access driveways for Key Cadillac - York Place — Intersection 4 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 1 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, ION a, Site LacatI6fZ- The project site is located just southeast of the Southdale Mail on the southeast quadrant of the York Avenue /69th Street intersection in Edina, MN (see Figure 2.1). Proposed Site Hgu,va 2.1 — Location Nap h. Lana( Use and Intensity The proposed development will consist of a 13,013 square foot pharmacy building with 90 parking stalls. The CVS Pharmacy parking lot and driveways will be shared by York Place apartments. The proposed 90 stall parking lot will abut 17 existing York Place parking stalls (providing 107 stalls in the shared lot). The shared parking lot will be used by visitors at York Place, however residents will use the underground parking garage accessed from Xerxes Avenue east of the site. rte phut See Figure 2.2 for the proposed site plan. The plan shows the concrete sidewalk planned along the south, west, and north borders of the site. a? t)evetapment Watt rye, Phasing, End M17419 The CVS Pharmacy is planned to be built and fully operational by 2011. This proposed CVS Pharmacy is part of the York Place site CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 3 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, [AN' S pa.cFigure 2.2 k Site Pk 7 F cv� M- M-rT-1:7: F FT— 7� 14 UOMMmm-071 a 0 X loic-7. = SIDEWALK Sits Plan prapared for T[ia Va4-nstr Ccnvanees by Loucks Associatze CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 5 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN C iA UOMMmm-071 a 0 X loic-7. = SIDEWALK Sits Plan prapared for T[ia Va4-nstr Ccnvanees by Loucks Associatze CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 5 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN existing daily traffic volumes for York Avenue and 69th Street (intersection 2) are shown in Figure 3.5. The daily volume data is also included in the Appendix. Level of Serves LOS - An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are assi ned a "Level of Service" letter grade for g �,..• the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and LOS traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) r'- while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents ;=•e�' heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is typically considered LOS O= Acceptabie acceptable in the Twin Cities region. Individual �..=_, movements are also assigned LOS grades. :.: O ne or more individual movements typically .y operate at LOS F when the overall int ersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades LOS F= unaccept�tbtrs- (from a signal controlled intersection in San `f _ ` ". Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual = - movements. Source: City of San Jose, CA The LOS results for the existing study hours are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.1. The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM sofhrvare utilizing the City of Edina's existing model. The City of Edina's existing SYNCHROTM model was used for the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection and the driveway intersections (Intersections 1, 3 & 4) were added to the model. The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. The York Avenue /69th Street _ (Intersection 2) intersection currently All currently operate s operates acceptably at LOS C, however _ the eastbound left turn movement r operates at LOS F during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours indicating the existing signal timing plans could be improved. If the signal timing plans are optimized, the intersection CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 7 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, I, /N F I. Spack Figure 3o 1 n Transportation Systc North No Seale 0 e� V Intersection 2 � f e Wst 6Uth S1 iii!!! l�SI'11,1i lilt ii�� 5011 (Routes6,538, BUS 53% 578) STOP Intersection I l� r t 1 1 r� 1� IE IN �M 22 BUS (Routes 6, 535, v STOP 534, 578) Intersection 3 d Intersection 4 1 SIDEWALK t c ^ Existing Driveway E t: Ca • Temporarily Closed ° 1� a 1 1 1 1 ,J CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 9 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN �-► Figure 3.3 PC (. - EAsting Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes W arth Km SOMO West 69th St CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 11 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, IANI Spack Figure 3,,r- Existing Daily Volume. Nam No Scale r Laga'nd ®July 2009 daily Traffic Volumes Source: Traffic data Inc. CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 13 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN No -Build volumes at the site driveways were adjusted during this process to account for the apartment residents and "visitors who would be able to use the access on York Avenue through the � shared parking lot in the Build scenario. Based on the trip distribution pattern shown in Figure 4.1, it is assumed approximately a fifth of the apartment vehicles using the existing driveway on 69th Street (Intersection 4) will shift to the right- in /right- out intersection on York Avenue (intersection 1) after the proposed project is constructed. The resultant 2011 Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.10 through 4.13. CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study itL-L' i 15 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, NN J CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study itL-L' i 15 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, NN a,. c , A ; . L r ': ( - - N - - ----------- - -- r: F�rAing IdE- S�u;lxiaVe ' CenlF:r � OU& �n�r,ri'tiw..h�►,.rrrFs � � lE ' - � r' r - 250/0, ouih�dwale�Ca�rlaV� '• 6.Ah St-\ I, r Ila1 ^: 70h St 1 7 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 6 ♦• Figure 4.1 Trip D istri L uti, Rofth ft0 e,Caka Legend Trip Distributions for Pharmacy /Drugstore Trip rip distributions for Apartment 17 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MIN ".4 1 M Cis urs 4.3 - Weekday PM P El U.k I Peak Hour VOUMS Bus to Devsr (DPM(Bnt North No Scale West 69th St CVS Pharmacy Traffic impact Study i 9 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, ION A. Spack� f '�-! n � 1 .� k '\ rte. � � Figure M North No Scabs CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 21 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, IVIN a, c k Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes North 6611 NO Scale wast 69th St A_51 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 23 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, WIN pis M - , - JL r A' - AI r Figure 4 fl 2 011 No -Build Daily V ®lum. Nom No Sca0® i CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 25 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN IA v West 69th St 1 +75 � ti � X100 � -�50 200 0 1 e 195e m 150 u 7 u 4 LID kd Cr ba r 7 D w t Cl:. N CVS- Apartment Right in /Right -out i 10 o , CD u� o h r OI � CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study r O 4 10 220 315E i l 27 York Avenuet69th Street - Edina, MN i i C r O 4 10 220 315E i l 27 York Avenuet69th Street - Edina, MN i i Nurs 4.4 _ 2®11 B uIld Daily Volume. ''f f�Ff C S�i CV MI phi Notes No sezEe f "7 � j i CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 29 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, ANN acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or better. Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2011 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and 69th Street in the No -Build and Build scenarios. Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, a four -lane divided roadway with right and left turn lanes such as York Avenue and 69th Street will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28,000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for LOS D on York Avenue and 69th Street in both the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. ba Queuing Analysis The Level of Service results do not fully address the impact of vehicles weaving across lanes in short distances. Problems with vehicles weaving across lanes could occur for two movements with the proposed site plan. The first is vehicles turning eastbound out of the CVS right -out access on 69th Street (Intersection 3) and then going into the left turn lane at the 69th Street/Key Cadillac - Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection to make a u -turn to ultimately go westbound on 69th Street. The second is vehicles turning northbound onto York Avenue from the right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection. To determine the length of the queues on the eastbound approach of the 69th Street/Key Cadillac - Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4� intersection and the northbound approach at the York Avenue /69t Street (Intersection 2) intersection, a more detailed traffic analysis was performed with a SimTrafficTm micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.1. were used with the 2011 Build Weekday a.m., Weekday p.m., and Saturday midday peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were transferred from the City provided SYNCHROTM model to SimTrafficTm. The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 5 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 5 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 31 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN The results in Table 5.2 show the maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will not spill out of the turn lane or back up past the CVS right -out driveway (Intersection 3) on the eastbouhd approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac- Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection. According to the Transportation Research Board's Access Management Manual, "recent research indicates that a right turn followed by a u -turn 'is safer than a direct left turn from an access connection'." Approximately ten u -turns will be made during each peak hour and are not anticipated to cause any problems. The results in Table 5.2 show the maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will spill out of the turn lane and back up past the CVS right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) on the northbound approach to the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours will be turning northbound onto York Avenue from the right- in /right- out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection. This is a low volume of vehicles and is not expected to cause crash problems. Furthermore, there are opportunities to improve the signal timing plan at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection to minimize the stacking on York Avenue while still maintaining an acceptable LOS D or better at the intersection. c. Parking Analysis According to a trip generation study completed by Traffic Data Inc. in November 2009 for CVS Pharmacies in the Twin Cities area, the maximum parking rate for the PIVi peak hour was found to be 2.54 parked stalls per 1,000 square feet of building or 33 stalls for a 13,000 square foot pharmacy. The proposed site is required to provide 80 parking stalls per City of Edina ordinances. The site plan currently has 86 surface parking stalls and 4 surface handicapped stalls, meeting the City's requirements. The amount of parking provided is expected to be adequate for the site. In addition to the 90 stalls proposed by CVS, the York Place apartment complex will retain 17 parking stalls adjacent to its building as part of the site. The overall parking lot on the southeast corner of York Avenue and 69th Street will contain 107 stalls. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Access Management Manual, 2003, page 204. r U, CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 33 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN side of York Avenue south of 69th Street across from the proposed site. A bus stop is also located on the east side of York Avenue north of 69th Street approximately 400 feet from the proposed site. These bus stops are served by Metro Transit Routes 6, 538, 539, and 578. CVS Pharmacy will post bus schedules near its doors for its employees and patrons use. 69th Street is designated as a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. To encourage the use Edina's Bicycle Routes near the site, CVS Pharmacy will provide bicycle racks near its entrances. To encourage walking, as well as the use of nearby transit, sidewalks will be built around the site as shown in Figure 2.2. This will connect the site with sidewalks. along York Avenue and 69th Street, which already have sidewalk systems that extend away from the site. 6e Conclusions and Recommendations The York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection currently operates acceptably at LOS C and will continue to operate acceptably at LOS C in both the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. The stop sign controlled study intersections on 69th Street (Intersections 3 & 4), as well as the CVS Pharmacy driveway on York Avenue (Intersection 1) will operate acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or better in the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. The maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will not spill out of the turn lane or back up past the CVS right -out driveway (Intersection 3) on the eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac - Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection. Approximately ten u- turns will be made during each peak hour and are not anticipated to cause any problems. The 2011 Build study peak hour queues at York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) will spill out of the turn lane and back up past the CVS right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) on the northbound approach to the intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours will be turning right onto York Avenue from the right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection. This is a low volume of vehicles and is not expected to cause crash problems. Furthermore, there are opportunities to improve the CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 35 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, 10 N REPORT/RECO M MENDATI ®N K. ACTION REQUESTED: Review the attached transportation impact (TIA) analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated May 14, 2010 and review memos dated March 31, 2010 and May'7, 2010 from WSB and Associates. Staff and WSB have reviewed the TIA dated May 14, 2010 and believe the development team has met the requirements of the TIA and review memos. The minor comments as outlined in WSB's May 7th memo have been addressed in the current TIA. Of so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Transportation impact Analysis for CVS Pharmacy at 69th and York does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system. ONF ®RMATI ®N /BACKGR ®UN®: This site is located in the southeast corner of West 69th Street and York Avenue. The site is currently a vacant lot that has changed proposed uses of the last few years. City of Edina staff and the ETC have reviewed the following transportation studies: a November 2006: 85 unit senior apartments and 39,000 sq ft retail-space • April 2008: _ 114 market rate apartments and 18,000 sq ft retail space The current proposal is a modification to the April 2008 proposal by switching out the two retail buildings (totaling 18,000 sq ft) with one building (CVS Pharmacy) totaling just over 13,000 sq ft. The CVS pharmacy will share the surface parking lot with the current apartment building to the east. The CVS is proposed to have two drive thru windows. �(s- TRANSP®RATI ®N Agenda Item Item Noe IV.B FT0:7EDINA MMISSI ®N From: Jack Sulllvan , ® Action - - Assistant City. Engineer 0 Discussion. D Information r May 209 2010 CVS Pharmacy Transportation Revlew (69th St: and York Ave.) ACTION REQUESTED: Review the attached transportation impact (TIA) analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated May 14, 2010 and review memos dated March 31, 2010 and May'7, 2010 from WSB and Associates. Staff and WSB have reviewed the TIA dated May 14, 2010 and believe the development team has met the requirements of the TIA and review memos. The minor comments as outlined in WSB's May 7th memo have been addressed in the current TIA. Of so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Transportation impact Analysis for CVS Pharmacy at 69th and York does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system. ONF ®RMATI ®N /BACKGR ®UN®: This site is located in the southeast corner of West 69th Street and York Avenue. The site is currently a vacant lot that has changed proposed uses of the last few years. City of Edina staff and the ETC have reviewed the following transportation studies: a November 2006: 85 unit senior apartments and 39,000 sq ft retail-space • April 2008: _ 114 market rate apartments and 18,000 sq ft retail space The current proposal is a modification to the April 2008 proposal by switching out the two retail buildings (totaling 18,000 sq ft) with one building (CVS Pharmacy) totaling just over 13,000 sq ft. The CVS pharmacy will share the surface parking lot with the current apartment building to the east. The CVS is proposed to have two drive thru windows. �(s- Memorandum andum To Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer. City of Edina From: Chuck Eickart, PE, PT OE Transportation Engineer WSE & Associates, Inc. Date: March 31; 2010 - Re: CVs Pharmacy — 60`h Street at York Avenue Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSE Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69h Street and York Avenue. This site was previously reviewed for development in late 2006 and again in 2005. The 2005 proposal included a 114 unit apartment building and 18,050 square feet of general retail space. The apartment building was constructed and is currently partially occupied. The general retail component has now been changed to the proposed CVS pharmacy. Based on our review of the previous studies and the current Traic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. The Traffic Impact Study should document the findings of the previous studies including the Cities reviews and indicate what improvements and / or recommendations from those studies and reviews were incorporated in to the CVS proposal. 2. With the analysis of existing conditions a discussion of the available bus routes is included. A map showing the relationship of the bus routes with the bus stops and the CVS site should be included. 3. The existing Level of Service (LOS) analysis section indicates that a movement LOS of F is acceptable when the overall LOS. is at a D. Unfortunately, this is occurring at the 69th Street and York Avenue intersection with an overall LOS C. The text indicates this could be mitigated with signal timing changes. The results of the timing changes should be documented, not only for the existing conditions but also for the future 2011 build and no -build conditions. This signal is controlled by Hennepin County and, therefore the County will ultimately be responsible for the final approval of any signal timing plans. . C:tWSHEdinu%CVS Rnicw.doc 709 Xenia Avenue South ® Infrastructure a Engineering is Planning ®Constvuction Suits #300 A,soc;mes- Grr. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -9700 Memorandum andum To Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer. City of Edina From: Chuck Eickart, PE, PT OE Transportation Engineer WSE & Associates, Inc. Date: March 31; 2010 - Re: CVs Pharmacy — 60`h Street at York Avenue Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSE Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69h Street and York Avenue. This site was previously reviewed for development in late 2006 and again in 2005. The 2005 proposal included a 114 unit apartment building and 18,050 square feet of general retail space. The apartment building was constructed and is currently partially occupied. The general retail component has now been changed to the proposed CVS pharmacy. Based on our review of the previous studies and the current Traic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. The Traffic Impact Study should document the findings of the previous studies including the Cities reviews and indicate what improvements and / or recommendations from those studies and reviews were incorporated in to the CVS proposal. 2. With the analysis of existing conditions a discussion of the available bus routes is included. A map showing the relationship of the bus routes with the bus stops and the CVS site should be included. 3. The existing Level of Service (LOS) analysis section indicates that a movement LOS of F is acceptable when the overall LOS. is at a D. Unfortunately, this is occurring at the 69th Street and York Avenue intersection with an overall LOS C. The text indicates this could be mitigated with signal timing changes. The results of the timing changes should be documented, not only for the existing conditions but also for the future 2011 build and no -build conditions. This signal is controlled by Hennepin County and, therefore the County will ultimately be responsible for the final approval of any signal timing plans. . C:tWSHEdinu%CVS Rnicw.doc Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer .Pock Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck 11ickart, PE, PT'OE T'rransportrataon Engineer WSD & Assocl aces, Inc - - - - - Drate: May 7, 2010 Re: CVS Pharmacy — 69* Street at York Avenue Revised Traffic Impact Steady Review City of Edina WSD Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the revised Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69u' Street and York Avenue. The Traffic Impact Study dated March 25h, 2010 was reviewed and comments were outlined in a review memo dated March 31St, 2010. The developer and his consultant met with City Staff and WSB and reviewed the comments. Spack Consulting subsequently prepared the revised Traffic Impact Study dated April 20"', 2010. Based on our review of the previous study and the current revised Traffic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. In general the comments from the March 31St review memorandum have been addressed. 2. In the Executive Summary section under the primary findings of the study, items i and iv seem to be conflicting. One indicates an overall LOS of C for all intersections and one indicates that the LOS at 69h Street and York would be at a LOS D with the retiming. This should be clarified. 3. In the Projected Traffic section under Non -site Traffic Forecasting, the 34 vacant apartments are discussed. This should be further clarified how many of those trips are actually using the CVS site access. It just indicates that the majority would use Xerxes Avenue. 4. it is still unclear how the site traffic in Figures 4.2 — 4.5 add up to that shown in Table 4.1. These values should be the same, especially now that the pass -by trips have been eliminated. A ('i J CAWSB%E&=%CVS R� imd ec.sc...d- W.. Xenia Avenue South ® Infrastructure a Engineering a Planning ■ Construction 701 Suite #300 &.a,S,r'ffe.lx. Minneapolis, MR 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer .Pock Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck 11ickart, PE, PT'OE T'rransportrataon Engineer WSD & Assocl aces, Inc - - - - - Drate: May 7, 2010 Re: CVS Pharmacy — 69* Street at York Avenue Revised Traffic Impact Steady Review City of Edina WSD Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the revised Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69u' Street and York Avenue. The Traffic Impact Study dated March 25h, 2010 was reviewed and comments were outlined in a review memo dated March 31St, 2010. The developer and his consultant met with City Staff and WSB and reviewed the comments. Spack Consulting subsequently prepared the revised Traffic Impact Study dated April 20"', 2010. Based on our review of the previous study and the current revised Traffic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. In general the comments from the March 31St review memorandum have been addressed. 2. In the Executive Summary section under the primary findings of the study, items i and iv seem to be conflicting. One indicates an overall LOS of C for all intersections and one indicates that the LOS at 69h Street and York would be at a LOS D with the retiming. This should be clarified. 3. In the Projected Traffic section under Non -site Traffic Forecasting, the 34 vacant apartments are discussed. This should be further clarified how many of those trips are actually using the CVS site access. It just indicates that the majority would use Xerxes Avenue. 4. it is still unclear how the site traffic in Figures 4.2 — 4.5 add up to that shown in Table 4.1. These values should be the same, especially now that the pass -by trips have been eliminated. A ('i J CAWSB%E&=%CVS R� imd ec.sc...d- W.. J6 S. A, MINUTES OF THE I A� Edina Transportation Commission o e tA Thursday, May 20, 2010 �4 m Edina City Hall ® 4501 West 50th Street ° f Ic Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Usha Abrarnovitz, Tom Bonneville, Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Jean White, Geof Workinger, Nathan Franzbn MEMBERS ABSENT: Julie Slerks STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order ll. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of April 15; 2010 III. Old Business a. 66th Street Speed Study IV. New Business a. Edina's Greenstep Cities b. CVS Transportation Impact Analysis (69th and York Avenue) Assistant City Engineer Sulllivah explained that redevelopment of this site was first presented to the ET-CJ h .200.6 -for 85 senior apartments and 39,000 sq. ft. of retail space, it was again presented In 2008` for 114 apartments and 18,000 sq. ft. retail space. In 2008, the ETC r.::.. appFoved the traffic study with the condition that the developer improve their W. 69t exit across from the car dealership. Mr, Sullivan said the apartment building was completed in 2009 and; the improvement was made to W. 69th Street. He said CVS Pharmacy is requesting approval to develop the retail space into a 13,013 sq. ft. building with 90 parking stalls and two drive thru windows. Mr. Sullivan said in 2006.and 2008 the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) policy was not in existence but is required now. He said the focus of the TIA was on W. 69th Street and York Avenue, the right in /right out off York Avenue, the right out from the drive thru windows, and full shared intersection on W. 69th Street to determine the build and no -build level of service. Mr. Sullivan said the analysis showed that the level of service would remain the same after development. He said the signal timing at W. 69th and York can be improved but this area is Hennepin County's jurisdiction and the developer will work with them to make improvements after the store is open. n Z�� ,o IN ug YORK AVENUE SOUTH �f � 1 � t m y Z co 'm I � � I 1 1� 1 I ' f 1 I I 1 I \J� Z m O L € C m �z ° HLSC mo �2 eLO M- r A m m L m j A m y 0 Ap D N Z W p 0 D p p m n O 0 2 r C x N n O Fi?vOSOa O viii < ' C>> a p 81024 yvNyI,I V 0 0 Z N pmnA m 9 Om y Z m `i < mm Pn n t L _ u�zi loon° �n���a OR, F >riY 3'Ou n ° g $ n 38no;,a it rj& A o 4 - Sig 3 a gin w�- b a n 0nn �y� H ma m o 00 4yu�inu 00� Y� � 9y 0000 y BCOG 8000 y 8m��� n 2 C __22 6 noon a o zg 0000 onnn 0000° nnoon >g Z nm�m� m mmm�� 2 Z m Z � 1 � t m y Z co 'm I � � I 1 1� 1 I ' f 1 I I 1 I \J� Nov t 9A• vl•^•' A` RIGHT HAN aim D _ r CS52767 `� SEC Allow s,. 70TH STREET ' 69TH STREET W AND - L YORK AVENUE S n}s R r r j v � EDIN& MINNESOTA ' c �,,,.,, ► lit. — 40. . ! G 1 ' � � L [ 4� ,. •a. -,.w � VELMEIR COY PANIFS ASSOCIATES - � vl.n.ng•l.rNfry�r.IwN�)na]r4 O I moll, ` � - ... ._.. . T � X . `- - � , Pow� � l� 4 •lryhnr: l>AINt455i15 „ fu Nl.•iBtt v.LJw.. w •... r1'I L L� _ poll loll Ali• `` : .. R1 t i Z C fT 1 BIKE RACK _ ti. h • _rte BIKE RACK _ BENCH BENCHES 69TH STREET . . �. ... , ,h ol,fro — — i _ Ir� ,.rl _ - %S BIKE RACK �. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE , a ` —CAL ( -j •r r`"' BENCH - -- •• PEDESTRIAN ' EXHIBIT ✓ ; tj.. .w +u•.. i 09/15/2010 PTI120 —1W 111— look. °. _ _ _ � � PEDESTRIAN EXHIBIT CVS SEC YORK AVE SO. &WEST 69TH STREET EDINA, MN PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: SITE, GRADING, DRAINAGE; EROSION CONTROL, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, SHEET INDEX CURB & GUTTER, PAVING AND LANDSCAPE CO.1 COVER SHEET C14 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1 -2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2.1 SITE PLAN 0-1 GRADING 8 DRAINAGE PLAN 0-2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (SWPPP) C4 -1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEET LI -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. This Existing Conditions Plan was prepared by a field survey prepared by Loucks Associates and record utility drawings from the City of EDINA 2. We have shown buried structures and utilities on and/or serving the site to the best of our ability, subject to the following restrictions: a. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. b. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate services from their main line to the customer's structure or facility - they consider those segments private installations that are outside their jurisdiction. If a private service to an adjoiner's site crosses this site or a service to this site crosses an adjoiner, it may not be located since most operators will not mark such 'private services. c. Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of a buried structure or utility. d. Maps provided by operators, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. e. The surface features and elevations shown on this drawing were located by Loucks Associates. I. All of the underground utility information and location shown on this plan were prepared from record drawings obtained from the client and the City of EDINA records. g. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651/4544)002. VICINITY MAP WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 6SI- 454.OW2 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER CALL BEFORE YOU CC , Gopher State One Call TAN CITY AREA: 651 -454 -0007 TOLL FREE: 1- WO-252 -1166 n... CM IEGM I� o �__ • mI C"f ®® ra fa ®e f oam D 61 Ci�onee O,elu[e 11.w 4 A,osr)fmnexh,r m loan M CM fvr e:na• rr w 0 .aa • a �P ass Q rlf0 YfrO[ fpp19L aof Q LfYlr ..soi — fof... �• — fr oalwv mllm T �� —I— rrar of Iou r fa .r.vwri• vsfr rwrw+'� - I.mOili >oe DESIGN CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 7200 HEMLOCK LANE VICKI VAN DELL SUITE 300 TEL: 763. 424 -5505 MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55369 FAX: 763 -424 -5822 ARCHITECT NORR, INC. IOHN POLSINELLI 719 GRISWOLD STREET TEL: 313 - 324 -3115 DETROIT, MI 48226 FAX: 248 - 936 -8083 CVS/ phumew MODIFIED RKdFT ENTRANCE _� YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS Y 52767 CVS STORE f 5788 CITY OF EDINA. . HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN 0 VELMEIR COMPANIES ftlowho —ft—F M CIATES lad[p l� • 4.Irrr rem Mn+oe ln. -fur loo ur.aod'a.a.rm fifes TWW�oenUbN4: =s � rra rrrr.rr.ramrrrr. rferrrr. Mlle svn,wr N oo Q�,HOh6R Mn1WYrtAl VILA, ri.f Owips el. Levi+ �f..rawrrr.e +d.s.Ir aorfwr.r.rr.er.rrrr I ylfafwe.fere,M�I.rsrr arerrr.r 1/dlf yr CkF -R nTss '.i llrlr lln mr 6.� WBSyIy s WBS mI C"f Cl.l uofineCOnnaehw na munxmf v.I MR- 61 Ci�onee O,elu[e 11.w C1.2 A,osr)fmnexh,r m C" MMFL. CM O a of U4 IwfafrM R- I S rA COVER SHEET No: Loucks Project No 06416 Shm No, CO -1 - I I I. 7 % P Rim-877.5 In- q67.0 A 1\ nrl - Soitery Stub Ff. Of rMet 8, Piv Omkwp & &Wfy ESM'I Par Doc 87W awkg. & Loffity Esin't Per Dot a=7 No, SNS=7-, L 1b 1 L_ °- ' -- --SF Comer Of Tract A Vent STMH 0 smu MWHME P. j - .4 r7 1, I Rim-877.5 i. This EX19 . 1% Ca liftM Plan was " F '11. ed h1 aleld SU1%v Y . of by AwoCAftar4vvcordudIIy&zvkW Per Utility City 4 EDNA v L We have Sliown bAW structures and utillitits on wWVor - CULVERT saving the site to the be.9 of our ability, subject to the SC= IN FM F CALL BFiDRE YCII 01(3, - a. Udlity opaat, do ra coraWandy respond IID locate • 10" 06 requests t1dough " GoFher Sim One Can serAce for 0 YAIW LIGM STMH n r •ff "M _7 Inv­(862-9) locate Se ekes from deir main line to the customers —UPWOROUM TELEPNONE EL 0A 7 structure or facility - dwy consider those segments Y., . b 'b AA / . . --�TApproxlnnote Loco private installatiars that are outside dair jurisdictlow If a CAME TV PMESOL _—UNDERMIOUPID TRAFM % a private sery toana4cineessitecrossesthis site or — - —ORM TILE w WOW lb a service OD dtis site Crosses an adJoiner, it may not be Underground Utwit Camp Markin a UnUrr PEKSIAL ----CK-A UM FENCE RCP overflow located since rrO9 oPervion; will not mark such mp*v —POST FEIIOE In zj. o GAS VALVE . y I _879,— r r r,% t 1 1. 1 1 "X r r- f /" , I. I C'. a TOEM04E MANIOLE any PA PALM op Approximate Lo obscure otherwise vIsIbk evidence of a burled shectIve R FOE e ELECTW MEM =001101ETE Muct 'W' RLS ha 6291 note 1/ dcad° Sr witum 0 NATO HOLE _ - TR TREE (We �ti' I''�l'' OGNIFEFICUS TM, wA %&ALT 0 POST NOICAM VALVE AP—_ -0. -lb" 7 A B scrii •A. -to" v CP SAN 5 a, nv- 0 RIV LM of W. JJO - I I I. 7 % P Rim-877.5 In- q67.0 A 1\ nrl - Soitery Stub Ff. Of rMet 8, Piv Omkwp & &Wfy ESM'I Par Doc 87W awkg. & Loffity Esin't Per Dot a=7 No, SNS=7-, L 15"324' location or In lieu of such a location, veryoken"- RCP -1�15' RCP inamurateorinwncksive. ter 12' RCP - I I, �'-__ 57TH - e. The surface features and elevations shown an this 141, Rim-878.1 drawing were located by Loucks Associales. CIO,, lnr(863,0 N-W) I. All of the undersround utility Information and location at 'p,, • In"(1160.5 E- W) show an"ptan were prepal fiam-em dravAnp All? W'4 lnTw(856.3) obtained from the client and the City of EDINA ---CBMH + x BOO Rim-877.3 S. EXTREME CAUTION MWT BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN !nV!-854.8 EXCAVATION TAKES MACE ON OR NW THIS 9TE. I .: I- - . -11 . I . 10- 1 - .- -- . R Inv- 8721(w) BEFORE DIGGING, • _Approximate Local aw- -,jib Of Underground Utilities 16 Per Utility Company \;p Ttact A Markings (typ) Approximate Location of Underground Inni tration' , " - .011�h Basin per Plons-f�,' T .69", 51) r N 9. x-11 x6p, Grovel Surface -,--CBMH O� St, -9L84Rm87051 . 5 Ld .6"S' Stubs 24- " P L slig leg - Approxuna e oca tan Underground Fiber Optic Tart East vehjc�War Ao�e%; Esmlt Per D= AkXI4527= - Cables Per Field Markings r ftl4527" % 16, Aeff............ ... Surface Bituminous Surlac x" -Lkw A-• '19 x-O I L IYO* East Pedestrian Access EsTn't Per Doc No. 45279JO S .0, —=-S Fine Tr_wF_A .%"End Curb And Gutter­,, P - -- N89'54251. 194.81 Parking Lot 1b 1 L_ °- ' -- --SF Comer Of Tract A Vent STMH 0 smu MWHME Rim-877.4 Inv=855.0 j - .4 r7 1, I Rim-877.5 i. This EX19 . 1% Ca liftM Plan was " F '11. ed h1 aleld SU1%v Y . of by AwoCAftar4vvcordudIIy&zvkW Per Utility City 4 EDNA vp) L We have Sliown bAW structures and utillitits on wWVor - CULVERT saving the site to the be.9 of our ability, subject to the SC= IN FM following resiric" - , CALL BFiDRE YCII 01(3, - a. Udlity opaat, do ra coraWandy respond IID locate • 10" 06 requests t1dough " GoFher Sim One Can serAce for 0 YAIW LIGM STMH boundary purpines such as ddL b. Thom utility that do k alien w ill not r •ff "M an Inv­(862-9) locate Se ekes from deir main line to the customers —UPWOROUM TELEPNONE EL 0A 8" Watermoin Per Cit• structure or facility - dwy consider those segments M WISC Mar 0 NC UPIn I private installatiars that are outside dair jurisdictlow If a CAME TV PMESOL _—UNDERMIOUPID TRAFM % a private sery toana4cineessitecrossesthis site or — - —ORM TILE w WOW IF a service OD dtis site Crosses an adJoiner, it may not be M WONWOOD a UnUrr PEKSIAL ----CK-A UM FENCE RCP overflow located since rrO9 oPervion; will not mark such mp*v —POST FEIIOE WA IWWAE o GAS VALVE . 1b, Serviom c. Snow and Ice conditions during whiter note may a TOEM04E MANIOLE SIGWL PA PALM op Approximate Lo obscure otherwise vIsIbk evidence of a burled shectIve R FOE e ELECTW MEM =001101ETE Underground I, T=ct Area F of utility. dL maps provided by openittam either along with a field 15"324' location or In lieu of such a location, veryoken"- RCP -1�15' RCP inamurateorinwncksive. ter 12' RCP - I I, �'-__ 57TH - e. The surface features and elevations shown an this 141, Rim-878.1 drawing were located by Loucks Associales. CIO,, lnr(863,0 N-W) I. All of the undersround utility Information and location at 'p,, • In"(1160.5 E- W) show an"ptan were prepal fiam-em dravAnp All? W'4 lnTw(856.3) obtained from the client and the City of EDINA ---CBMH + x BOO Rim-877.3 S. EXTREME CAUTION MWT BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN !nV!-854.8 EXCAVATION TAKES MACE ON OR NW THIS 9TE. I .: I- - . -11 . I . 10- 1 - .- -- . R Inv- 8721(w) BEFORE DIGGING, • _Approximate Local aw- -,jib Of Underground Utilities 16 Per Utility Company \;p Ttact A Markings (typ) Approximate Location of Underground Inni tration' , " - .011�h Basin per Plons-f�,' T .69", 51) r N 9. x-11 x6p, Grovel Surface -,--CBMH O� St, -9L84Rm87051 . 5 Ld .6"S' Stubs 24- " P L slig leg - Approxuna e oca tan Underground Fiber Optic Tart East vehjc�War Ao�e%; Esmlt Per D= AkXI4527= - Cables Per Field Markings r ftl4527" % 16, Aeff............ ... Surface Bituminous Surlac x" -Lkw A-• '19 x-O I L IYO* East Pedestrian Access EsTn't Per Doc No. 45279JO S .0, —=-S Fine Tr_wF_A .%"End Curb And Gutter­,, P - -- N89'54251. 194.81 Parking Lot East L 7 of Tract Garage Exhaust 1b 1 L_ °- ' -- --SF Comer Of Tract A Vent STMH 0 smu MWHME Rim-877.4 Inv=855.0 BA SASSWOOD .4 r7 1, I Esm'j Per Obc ft 4527930 Rim-877.5 • am MMHOLE —1 —SAW AW SEW SEIMCE 00 w"M 5 —• —WATER SEINICE Z East L 7 of Tract Garage Exhaust 1b 1 L_ °- ' -- --SF Comer Of Tract A Vent AP APPLE 0 smu MWHME York west Pedestrian A. BA SASSWOOD 0 SAW1011tr MAPOICLE Esm'j Per Obc ft 4527930 11111M • am MMHOLE —1 —SAW AW SEW SEIMCE 00 w"M NORM —• —WATER SEINICE Z 0 20 40 - CULVERT as 13" SC= IN FM --UNDERSFOM CA" TV CALL BFiDRE YCII 01(3, - 0 Ulan POLE ---UNOUNCROUM ELECTRC Gopher State One Call 0 YAIW LIGM —UNDE10=110 FWN OM TWIN CITY AREA. 651 m-454-0002 r •ff "M an TOLL FREE. I-B00 -252-111141 NOTIFY GOPHER ST) ONE CALL LEAST 48 N WK IN AnVAhIrT AT 6511A54-0002- SURVEY LEGEND AS AM OM CATCH am _W01411 so'ItIl AP APPLE 0 smu MWHME _500"Mr SEMER BA SASSWOOD 0 SAW1011tr MAPOICLE — I —won" 11111M • am MMHOLE —1 —SAW AW SEW SEIMCE 00 w"M "I"n —• —WATER SEINICE Z Wn VALVE - CULVERT as 13" o PUMM POLE --UNDERSFOM CA" TV CA CIM"A 0 Ulan POLE ---UNOUNCROUM ELECTRC Cc cew 0 YAIW LIGM —UNDE10=110 FWN OM co cffrrowmm r •ff "M an Of DEAD TM SRI —UPWOROUM TELEPNONE EL 0A SPOT ELDIAMOM ­U110131GROURD VnIny M WISC Mar 0 NC UPIn — - —OVEINIEM UTRAY n Fall a CAME TV PMESOL _—UNDERMIOUPID TRAFM IAA KiCKBOW 0 ELECTIOC TRA19WOFNEIR — - —ORM TILE w WOW M Tau"M PEOESIAL — --FOFlCE W94 M WONWOOD a UnUrr PEKSIAL ----CK-A UM FENCE Lo LOCUST a . ELECTW 000114OLE —POST FEIIOE WA IWWAE o GAS VALVE . —WOOD PENCE OA OAK a TOEM04E MANIOLE SIGWL PA PALM a Urlurr MAIIHOLE —CONCRETE CURB R FOE e ELECTW MEM =001101ETE Po POPLAII 6 GAS MEM 'CONT" Sr witum 0 NATO HOLE 1-r RA mca TR TREE (We 0 wavrORM WELL OGNIFEFICUS TM, wA %&ALT 0 POST NOICAM VALVE In WILLOW 0 SOL BORING SEC, YORKAVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET cvS cs 0 "M cvs STORE f FOB crry OF Emm MOON ODUMV. IVIN; VELMEM . COMPANIES r— • CbM 1 10 Ld AIIAMI sn raw eel. 4WD saww rrrrrrrrV _(Nwity COFOWL WEIS Wes 9114flO _W O" W" Cu OsTW C. a, o1A911cL aMwaITAN C34 aoLV CwIKxI­fflw" C.1 uRmILW W 7N IAI�MR7N shm raw. DUSTING CONDMONS PLAN Project No: Loucks Project No 06416 S Pjw C1 —1 - - -o - - - - - - - - -� / AP APPLE N —•— SANITARY SEWER BA BASSWOOD O SANITARY MANHOLE / N,/ 5i. O WATER MANHOLE — •— SWTARY SEWER SERVICE m O HtORAI4f — • —NIGER SERVICE q REMOVE COSTING 0 0 POWER POLE — m —UN�. UND CABLE TV I 0 LIGHT POLE STUB. CAP AT THE rAU / G,UTIER ° Q. r,I O TATD LORD - -- UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC VCP SAN S C ;ty As- B,ilts SNMH Rim =877.5 In— 67_0 00 \ \1--- - - - - -- 1 �< !gam 60 d at. 8" �IV- - Sonitary Stub - -8" PIV I i --878' -LLB J/ �1 1E9 pEWAlf - 4._ I a \I a 1 \0`e \ Al I / \ PAVEMENT CS /= ••:r�:�::�ar..':: ' Rim =878.1 ............ • Inv-- (662.9) 8" Wotermoin Per C ...... L----24" RCP overflow IS "dc24" REMOVE CP - CURB a 12" R gJl'IQt imate Location of REMOVE "ON OF a ` I Storm Stubs ..; % ..• .. — �� I .. ; 7.,:r, ! = ' -"' _ _ ......... OSTM LIM 11, ---- � /- ---8 L11 s. oA --- l —_ ,3: C % ru ax ° -`-- -- R N89 °54'25'f 194.81 Geroge p ; REMOVE OOSRIO Exhaust I o PAVEMENT Vent SV PAVEMENT 2 DEMOLITION NOTES I. The contractor shall take all precautions necessary to avoid property damage to adjacent properties during the construction phase of this project The contractor will be held responsible for any damages to adjacent properties occurring during the eonetruelbn phase of this project 2. The contractor will be responsible for providing and maintaining traffic control devices such as barricades. warning signs. directional signs, flagmen and lights to control the movement of traffic where necessary. Placement of these devices shall be approved by the engineer prior to placement. Traffic central devices shall conform to the appropriate Minnesota department of Transportation standards_ 3. In accordance with generally accepted construction practices, the contractor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions on the job site. Including safety t vft 7 of all persons and property during the performance of the work This requirement DEMOLITION SYMBOLS will apply continuously and not be limited to normal Narking hours 4. The duty of the engineo or the developer to conduct construction review of the DESCRIPTION contractors perfomance is not intended to include review of the adequacy of the contractors safety measures in• or near the construction site. - /— / — / —/- CONSTRUCTION LIMIT LINE 5. Before beginning construction the contractor shall install a Temporary Rod, Entrance pad at all points of vehicle exit from the project site. Said Rods Entrance pad / / /� / /� / REMOVE UTILITIES shall be maintained by the contractor for the duration of the project See details 7�f �vE O yvvrsarQT TREE shown on Sheet C3-2 of the project plane. S. Erosion and Sedimentation central measures shall be established around the entire REMOVE STRUCTURE site perimeter and in accordance with NPDES permit requirements. Best Management REMOVE CONCRETE Practices. City requirements and the details shown an Sheet C3-2 of the project plane. REMOVE BITUMINOUS 7. Demolition and utility work will require City permits. . ,.,.,- ,.,.,.,., ... . . . . . . . _ ............ REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER e, m mE U ¢ = lb /� approximate L Underground LTtench Arec x`•'15" RCP ---STMH Rim =878. Inv= (863.0 N -W In- (860.5 E -W Inv -- (856.3) -CBMH Rim =877.3 Inv- -854.8 Inv - 872.1(.) _M_. STMH - Rim -877.4 Inv= 855.0 STMH --- - - - - -- = Rim =877.5 _ Inv=854.5 ir, w•= 856.0(.) I IIr it. I NORTH 0 20 40 %7==� SCALE IN PEEP t.ALL BESCfE TTLU p0 Gopher State One Call TMN CITY AREA 55F454 -0002 TOLL FREE I- 1R10 -2S2 -1186 SURVEY LEGEND AS ASH o n CAM BASH 5TeaN g AP APPLE 0 SOIOI MANHOLE —•— SANITARY SEWER BA BASSWOOD O SANITARY MANHOLE — 1 — WIVEMM1M1 B ORM O WATER MANHOLE — •— SWTARY SEWER SERVICE BD BOgLDER O HtORAI4f — • —NIGER SERVICE BU BUCKEYE N CATE vALVE r— +CULVERT BS BUSH 0 POWER POLE — m —UN�. UND CABLE TV CA CATALPA 0 LIGHT POLE — aA- 1RDFAGOUHD ELECTRIC CE CEDAR O TATD LORD - -- UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CO COTTONWOOD f CITY WOE —UNDERGROUND GAS DE DENT TREE SIMin - - VIDERdddAC TELEPHONE EL ELM �++ Sp ELEVATION — r— INDEAOOND UTUN FR IRSC FRUIT M A/C UIt —°'— OVERHEAD IlfO1TY FI Fell O CANE 7V PEDESTAL — °�- VDE%ROUM 7RAFC WMN NA, WICKBERRY O ELECTRIC 7FROUZORIER — ^ — 711E Ni HICKORY M TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —^' —FORCE MAIN IR IRONWOOD Y UTILM PEDESTAL ---CHAIN LAO( EE)NCE LO LOCUSt O ELECTRIC MANHOLE POST FENCE uA MAPLE O GAS VALVE —WOOD FORCE DA OAK 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE 0:===---TRAFFIC SIGNAL PA PAM O UTILITY MANHOLE OONCEE CURB N PRE a ELECTRIC METER OCONCETE Po PC" O GIs I ERR _,2- , COMOUR SP SPRUCE B HAND HOLE ±N+�'+RAR ROAD TRACW TR TREE 0 MOOTOR NG WELL �'1 (GEN) CONIFEROUS TREE WA WALNUT 0 POST DICGITOR VALVE l M WILLOW 0 SOL BoAtHo DECIDUOUS TREE CVS/ pew AWIFIED RICER ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH AND WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS R 52767 CVS STORE B 5788 CITY OF E0644- HENNEM COUNTY, MN ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES Rskrehtwnlp+rre _. ASSOCIATES �W . D.a rnP..AW • hwdSw,rAW rTm H..h,a Hw. • Frw Lao AY ,.+�AAOuem SIM Twsew,eHnTNL�eTm Fs pUNLA.stl] vine NIRANNVFw ARww cwmmeaFUNTLONTA .....I.A a,aor s..a.s 1 •�4 +wr=w r..le.rr yuwrwrrepr.r.H.r rr Frr.rr.a .uv VidlL Vora Dee.Fr Lm� � 1>ti• VV BS 1IV85 VIV 9114A 0 min mAAAm Ch.h Lo$P COQIIONa_ C64 OTM°nIOHRAN u.h Hon nor uh oT.oee A mNNwQR.w at RosoncohrQ nArevsn cut mm ft. 11 -1 IAN DSGVI NANh T' . DEMOLITION PLAN N°: Loucks Project No 06416 1 Sheet NA. C1 -2 ---- ------- LO('( to NORR 879 I I I io-o r° r° 1 XI i� ► 1 en I \ c YJ PTO Z ,r I sit I ae a WEST 69TH STREET I GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES L odmme■ m ta m a a Waft. an m hP�l d r ednaa aalSd 7. � r ml rhdad m rtLM nMw ■a d 6 etlln n a On.Prw � / d d m tl. r Ai pea■, d ■ .e W ■, ddadpltl 4 . all Oaa1dmr~ anp ftd mq e leeallen■ and lam0■a d daaeeePml■ omtrada■ ■ahlY eee■eve h a n■v tlr curmb -ow dta 2 tllea ■d aneatoma atl/s �Yq dfnr tlr a■rl dyel -d-r} a■ ledsl Aatlll 6 !■Na O�Nq ar w b, wa mntrata ale■S Yald o Taerywy Red fie6av d d dl can tlr aRa Sd0 Ned D*— PW marts dd W angoeftl m 4f� d tlr da.A�d marar iddbrp d eab (adm d- 691- 7d0r)�alcygt tlr rP tl■r�Ma�a( d tM E■dl� daa, M Pea d palnb aNd■ RaMd .IM 6a mdildW G tlr -Iba br IM A■atlu� d ea VaMN- 9a M ft ans ova Paaa. Ilr d tE iab m 1M MA a 0 aN ae■ dYnl r'a, a, 9w1 C}� d tM Val.d P� S. Guise and StlnmealM ■aNd eena■■e atd M ■■td5dtl aen0 en. aMY■ g*rgdmee�0ea 1 N datvla0 mpa.ad am■ an m ramha mrren d 4 aide d tap d OW * Ra:tiea� all d■tab dmae mae Wmd 0-2 d er� pa d aa■d lA■e aam dd W ■arr■d py Uw ■c: uM■ ft ad a e-d r Va■YK b a Mdaf near. Sw --I P1. b w m lrsnnd - b N annum■ and es■eaellsu m di dnW dd M p.MeW Pa a.a eapiaeeb � d elm tl1)L TM mn- - - dd W rW..W. b d D/m8■ aW neUamlrn■ e l Tlr mb=ar dd rla d Pn Vmb 08—Y moats dmeas■ b adpeM PeoPalla e■rs eM amWdlm seem d ner Pm}°a. taw emeada *d naiad by a d t M add rapmaer Aar my dueeaw■ m adjaael WapaVa aasrAq ds■q IL Sea ateAy Plm aM ahem rnr Va■e ea A■Yer Bald e■yadlq the darn wr. Uea mrhue11on No• d tld■ vela- u' v.ard yady edan■em red a dUr as bd d ne■ dly appee+d vesq ola. r Ten mneraebr a ee. r.Pmrel. r veraro aW emrmrrs wlea �� dare and m Caneadary ■anrY alpeti dyadlsed aqa, Seoeem and Syeb m pe■snml Nr daMe. dad uie r< oanfrd ma ma■mml d traNle dea naaaavf e* woad tq ua awraa p1s m pr■■ e t rrdae mood a■ro. dd . _f_ m Ur weaPrleta Oda d•arenad d TranpaAaOm dandsda 6. r asadmea den wady mnord —Wbudk a pmUcdM n» mn4aeM aO w a o�••aamnwmdldyPeay.lya m pfrmnmeom a tli..eit dt d ass a wV a UFAM dy and al n. lemlre to mmnd mid,4 aae■. • 1 ,o / / i / e / / 16� r-w� - - - -- eejT ,1y9 NORTH 0 20 40 %7L=� SCALE IN FEET ■.■. aft LOW �® 0 aeemr e.aa o �� O : ealee INino � 4 ■,w fam .a■i1m MK mown a uie r< II �■ d ass Q:- • aem area m en.aa ■ra4 a mun re■a O —J i / e / / 16� r-w� - - - -- eejT ,1y9 NORTH 0 20 40 %7L=� SCALE IN FEET ■.■. CAIl <•'FaIE Ydl Ola Gopher State One Call TWIN aTY AREA: 651 -454 -0002 Tall FREE: e-WO- 252 -1165 rei cvso p MODIFIED R01T ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS • 52767 CVS STORE /5788 CITY OF ED%4- HENNEPIN COUNTY MN rv� ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES I.0- berrlan.a ASSOCIATES a ! . a.al,9 L ds.,wa ■ wryoeY,r:em ssxs rr�laee o■u.T�va ra ouw. -saa _ u.er.��r.r.: ■x �+ir�+.r,rrnmr .. r.� rrrrum�a —S. Z•O"���. r+nra.m..r.rsr+. i ■.w eaw r r ra a.r�. r+■.e.r ,� �u�.ir:rrr�r.w■.. rrmrrerr �vr a.a -n .uu ler.ea m Iv sBS ry ate_IIU 'aof�muo�aer are rmaa:mcno.dn CIJ a1Q1f�I1r■ me ane ue o.ucllW.eMa nJw W la0lgxcvrtacl n.wdirn cae unmmw oe mase u -e -1 WLQfMillw r' GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN Ra' Mo.: Loucks Project No 06416 No.: 0 -1 aft LOW �® 0 aeemr e.aa o �� O ealee O 4 ■,w fam .a■i1m MK am a uie r< II �■ d ass Q:- • aem area m en.aa ■ra4 a mun re■a O nas ■i.oi awm m nnors reae CAIl <•'FaIE Ydl Ola Gopher State One Call TWIN aTY AREA: 651 -454 -0002 Tall FREE: e-WO- 252 -1165 rei cvso p MODIFIED R01T ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS • 52767 CVS STORE /5788 CITY OF ED%4- HENNEPIN COUNTY MN rv� ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES I.0- berrlan.a ASSOCIATES a ! . a.al,9 L ds.,wa ■ wryoeY,r:em ssxs rr�laee o■u.T�va ra ouw. -saa _ u.er.��r.r.: ■x �+ir�+.r,rrnmr .. r.� rrrrum�a —S. Z•O"���. r+nra.m..r.rsr+. i ■.w eaw r r ra a.r�. r+■.e.r ,� �u�.ir:rrr�r.w■.. rrmrrerr �vr a.a -n .uu ler.ea m Iv sBS ry ate_IIU 'aof�muo�aer are rmaa:mcno.dn CIJ a1Q1f�I1r■ me ane ue o.ucllW.eMa nJw W la0lgxcvrtacl n.wdirn cae unmmw oe mase u -e -1 WLQfMillw r' GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN Ra' Mo.: Loucks Project No 06416 No.: 0 -1 Sema pore I ,0a T, b er 7 !RLL■E. QI■ AI■w TAY -D' mw lnas NAO PL 4•.4• Nm AfAROATI' CAR, w Nil=2). A, VV TR— N N- C0 M i R l I L■,YA■IV d N WASHO UOT EOR A RE A DETAIL @I aft I c" 1>61PIa NDNOIP4nAN MEMO.—. 0-2 DOJIOTTON Rw \ Q.1 9InAN 61 w W NODII 2wG. tPIP1 3`r cal I \ NTLIPan D ,1 11 -1 -1 U 2b LC I T6'1 ■/ e,l I .ab ROOT Q17RA1 PAID ei6� i Wee, NORTH WEST 69TH STREET T9' T96 ,qb j9T Tlk 0 E ` � / O � —BT9 J % . — — — / CALL BEFORE YOU DKi Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA. 051 -454 -0002 TOLL FREE 1- 800 -252 -1188 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 4544)002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SILT FENCE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE: IRON SEGW01T REACHES 1/3 M HEIGHT O SILT FETNCE R MUST E RMIOVED WITHIN 24 HDPS REPAIR OR REFACE OSFONCTIOIA SILT FENCE WITHIN 24 HOURS f / 11 /b / / / 16/ /0 / STOPS WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAIT "M WIDML NOTES, L THE HIATUS OF THIS PROJECT ELL DD79ST Of mOIWCING, PHARMACY. SIIEE7SAAI■014 MnEs 2. NIENED SEOIOOIC OF YAIOI NRiWCTIW ACTINiLi AE AS FOLLOWS: L INSTALL STAB12M 8001 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAM L NSTAILATION OF STAGE 1 SILT FDICE ARM" SIR L OEM AID a" IESIAP�D O SITE 4 STRIP AND STOOPILE TOPSON- ' S. ROUGH GRADING CE SITE L STAeEUE WORDED AREAS AND STaosafS 7. SMALL SANITARY EWER. WATERYANL STORN SEWER AND SERVICEIL SL N AL EROSION CONTROL AROLID ALL STRUMIREB. / L S1�CTT PARLWID LOTS INSTALL PAVDAW SECTDN / R PAVE SITE �me Wr� +8,,1 Rz INSTALL SEED AND SALON. CL DEN ALL OO/STgCTION ACTIVITY 15 COIPLETE AND M SITE 8 WAY03% REMOVE SET FORE AND RESEED ANY AREAS 01571A® 0 M RO OVA. L SITE OATH: B,. W AREA TO E DWIIENED - L85t W POST I- bje` RPERMOIR ALFA 0.24 m L2 m SL TYPES• SEE sOLS REPORT CIMM 4. M LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO E oBMiFD NAST E IDUMFED STN FLANS. STANCES SIGNS. f SILT PENCIL ETC H70E CONSTRUCTION ECNS 5 01ee S OOHEWIC1101 ACTIVITY - EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES r— TAE M AREA CAN PNAN OPEN MIDI NOT ACTIVELY TYR 6 u t1E 1 STEEPER TAN S'1 7 DAYS DI TO =I M DAPS LATTER THAN IMI M DAYS ® OONOTES SLOPES STEEPER THAN XI 6j95 L ON SLOPES xI ON MATER WINTAN SLEET FLOW AND NO= RILLS A D/OR W"M SLOPE LENGTHS CAM NOT E GREATER THAN 75 FEET. E* 7. ALL STOP DRAM AND INLETS LUST E PROTECTED ONOL ALL SORLQS O POTENTIAL IR501ME AE ® STABI L TEIPORANY STLL3 STOMOMM MIST HAVE UFFCTM SES01T CONTROL AID CAN NOT E RACED N SURFACE WATERS OR STOOL WATER CONVEYANCE S GIS ICANT AYONT O SILT. CLAY. OR ORGANIC o0OA Ot ) DSC T OCOPEEN E S A CrOnElCaATR E SDOI PLEL DENCUTW NIOQTE S70OPLE5 SAND ST000LE* 9. SMIAST LADEN WATER ISM E D60RwOD TO A SFDILID/TATION BASS WHENEVER POSSERL P 7. NOT POSSIBLE, R ILST E TREATED STN M APPROPRIATE SIP'S STgih D. STLD WATER MbT E 0.0OSE0 0 N�EiL7 111D M6T GODLY NTM SPCA OSPOSA EOId001TS V LL DOIOETL ■A9ALT 09ID ML IIOD AIO SOD .ANTE a]G111ED WT m10E'I[ .A9AIT OEIUTNP CL IN A NA L -DROOP NOITAMDIIS TRENT a LP AGE L■ Q A mPACTED D CLAY LINER THAT 0 0 NOT ■ADgR LAWS N ENTER OIQND WRIG O D ®w PERM ARE LOA M LIQUI D AND ILA WASTES MIST NOT CONTACT M ODOQ AN THERE MIST NOT IS MEOW PAN M CONCRETE WADMff O AtI WS N AREAS, AND 0W WASTES MIST DISPOSED or P 1OLRLY ANG CI S WITH REGULATIONS, A SM E LED D rONT TO EACH ■IWWT FACILITY TO INFO S WITH mPSOCT 09LL0 8 To UTILIZE THE PR OM /LDITd CL OIIOMA WADING O THSOM AND aTON C06TrCN01 MINCES ILST E LAMW TO A DERV D AREA O M SITE ROOF MOT E CONTAINED LD WASTE PROPERLY O POSID OJNO BOWE O[OEASINC O ALLOWED ON SITE 6 M OWNER RID OPERAIOI IIIE M 0111E11 ■ND i>00 M APPLICATION IS A PEMETTEE AND 8 E@OP�E FOR COPL111NCE rm lORB LD OOIOTGB OF 710 PTYf. M OPERATOR EOYp�ArILT M OD43M DD SM M APPLICATION 6 A PO Iff"M FUN APPLICATION AND 11 � REM§t OR 6FTIS OF NCIPO®E WAIN M ONWI FOR WPLINIQ WINE THOM POOI00 OF M PENT. LL WYNE NW FDA OpOTSCRO1 PNORCm wpm M ODOR OR MGIITW ONATifs O.O. 6,91 LN OILOPIK EMDPE71 ,n. a PWNTNO O M PROPERTY 70 VAHI08 10E81EDF10 ON SELLS M GIR SITE 10 A NOR OWOa a M OgWJONOT Or01 DMA. PROVO[ A COPT O M CORER IIDIICE O Tee TpENrTO1�EE� NNOfICATIW NON TO M NEW OrOI. M MOOIAICAEDNT a■N01 LMNL B PROVIDE A SNP TOM NEW OWNER AND OPERATOR THAT SPECIFICALLY ADOES4'S M RONIMD OOISIRIICN01 ACTIVITY. IIDTD M NOM O TGRr1AT1ONAMWET MODIFICATION TOM 8191 REPLACKS F�VO011VmW AIDOSIRAIR PEINT TRMLYGA4�GTION AND NO= O \M NEW ONER CA ODLLTOR DILL SAM A COHII[1! AID BMW POW YDRWATON PORTION MOST MODIFICATIONS NUDE SIANWSIMN EONiRATG1 ON PINNY TRANSFER) O M 4 MORTICE O TOENIITNONPMW NCO ATOM FUN TOM IPCA POOR m COILOIONG e COQIDLTp1 AC"A" W DR ER N NO CAM LATER TWIN SING A.7) DAIS AFTER TROD OMM"V Cr THE PROPERTY. M NEW P7YTTEEM LE AEYONMME FEN ONg1ANICE STN ALL TERYL AID CONDITIONS O THIS PTY". SI P M OPERATOR ON GOOPIL CONTRACTOR HAS COPLETW TNOM PORTION O MISS ON M SITE 8 NO LOSING N OPERATIONAL OO TIM O M PROJECT. AND ALL CONiMCNA OBLIGATIONS E11ED1 M 0110 NO OPERATOR MR a7DIA CONTRACTOR SLATED TO COFUAND MTN M AND TMIS 6 MAY TRANWDI OF BLACK Oro �OWNDWI O D ATtWMOPGAT01� M J bTO O TOYNATDNtVII YT MOFICATN POW A aGATLM FRW ROTH M OWNER AND OPERATOR 15 OmEaBE L POW MM "S" TO TUNOI ►R COMIAE aDM THIS POW 1SIST SIELW A NOTICE O TESDIAEOI (RIOT) TO M IPCA (OWlAIIOL riN 110 NOWT 8 EOILIED VTR w NOT m SINaTTED. M PTOffl4'(» WVERAOL TEHIWIIITO Ai 10g1T W M POSTWAOI DAR O M 1107, OI ON M OLIO W OSNE NW 8 SINWTTED 10 M LPG LTDYNIATION O COVERAGE SCCIrrOS :TD■DUTICW O COVGAE FOR M CRIME PROW. ILLL PDYTIQ(Sj M8T SIWNET A NOT STEM W DAYS AFTER RENAL STABILIZATION IONS KEN NONMED ON Ml /ONI00 O M SITE FOR MEW M Pp0■Wa 8 TESPONS9E AND ALL OMOUPCI01 ACTIVITY ILLS ®N COPIE?M E M SITE ENOIDO PERMANENT STOWRATER INLET PROTECTION WN srAMEUAm �� E �� AS (TYPICAL) APENSTIEDS) MST SURNIT A KNOT WITHIN W DAYS AFTER SE11M. M ONTWE SITE w0.1OING ROADS ND WOMWATER NRASTRVCTER NO COVOIAQ 8 mwDOND TO ANOTHER ONG. A TRINATION O OOVONACE FOR A PORTION O M ORR PROJECT. NL POOET1fII5) VAST SNET A NOT THIN S[VER C11 DAR AIRR nZ ON OT0119 IEDNLY 1TI116DOWD PORTIONS O M STE TO Mtl15D1 ►MIT AID T!Y ARE RIO LONGER M OIN0 Y OERATOL M PORTIONS O M SR BONG SOD TO ANOTHER PARTY LUST E N CMPt1LNR rm M PIN■ET (E.0 ALL 7ELPERAO EAOWON PROIECIDI ATD DDLDNT ONTROL N EA9RES MST E ■ PLACE) M TOW M6T NUDE SIOrTUSS FIIOI M QOONA POIIETCI(S) AND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR M NEW OWNER O M PROPERTY. a TOWMATON O COVOVE OBTN01910 A DEOIMDON ROISTRATIO. W PW■T COVERAGE WAS OILiMEO N9r M Dm1eON S1aTRATIM PROMM PRIATTO(S) LE RIMMED TO SWAT A NOT STN W DAYS AFTER AMOD ILA WIAIIATOL IL RISPEc TONS A INITIAL ■ gWICH FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY RFPRE4IITATYF 8 REQUIRED. 8 DPDSED SW LEA& ONCE EVERT 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOLRS FOLLOWING A 0.5. OVER 24 NOBS RAM EWRT. C STABLING AREAL ONCE EVERY SD DAYS C FROZEN WOAD: AS 1001 AS BMNIFF OCLRPS ON PRIOR TO IESAANC Cn6TSCTIO. O. DOMED+ NPRT KEEP RECCES tr ALL PRMm EOIAIIED FCR M PROJECT. ALL INSPECTIONS AND YANTERNIfR Pf]LNANFNT OPFRA701 AND =11DIANCE AG EELDITS. NO REWIRED CACLLATIONS i IESPORATY AND PWrlEINT STORY WATER IIANllftl@1T SY5IOLS TEST RECORDS MST E RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS IS SWPPP MIST E LIDDED HEEL A TIDE 8 A CHANCE N NSW. OPERATIOL W INTENAIRL WEATHER OR SEAS- CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNRICNT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE a INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT M SWPPP 8 NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS D(CEFDINC WATER UJAUTY STANDARDS, C M OWLS N M SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING PCIALTANTS N DISCHARGES ON IS NOT . COISVW WITH M TDM AND CONDITIONS OF M PEOET. TL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ESTIMATED PREIARNARY CIIARTTES TAIKLATIOI ANTICIPATED AT START OF EIE PROJECT FOR M LIFE OF M PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SED001T CONTROL BLIP'S N M STOTP. 2D. AOOITNNA BLIP'S SMALL E INSTALLED FOR PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF AND HAVE ST RRIIATER FLOWS TO NPAMED WATERS SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC 8YP% 2L ALL EVOSED SOTS MST E WADUIID NO LATER THAN P DAYS AFTER M CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY N THAT PORTION OF M DR HAS TRPOMRLY OR PERYA DITLY CEASED. CVS/ MODIFIED RIGHT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH AND WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS 0 52767 CVS STORE S 5788 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN VELMEIR COMPANIES f io-bo —VIN 0 ASSOCIATES EyinyE .. EgYrVW . Nan/ S A NilbSap Aldi4va • NwYIVVImNr Tm .A. IA,■ I m wlTdvi au.m sssa TMWIas O4JN24SSOS I= O43NNdDA �Nri S�r�wA �.riyrawa�Nr +tea scmr n ur— rre—rrwi lw'�`iw�anair� _ urrrr r r�rr•�r� rr�r�iN r N o /m nNNNFaw 4ONo TNNBOArNTnwfUWTTL- WNINE rVAAp,rNn�WaNr NS.■r I r,,.TerrrrrVa WANr.,�ar 1� a aNP l4nNA r,rN■sN W �� uYN r r rrrrNw�A. allu 7 !RLL■E. QI■ AI■w TAY -D' mw lnas NAO PL 4•.4• Nm AfAROATI' CAR, w Nil=2). A, VV TR— N N- C0 M i R l I L■,YA■IV d N WASHO UOT EOR A RE A DETAIL STOPS WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAIT "M WIDML NOTES, L THE HIATUS OF THIS PROJECT ELL DD79ST Of mOIWCING, PHARMACY. SIIEE7SAAI■014 MnEs 2. NIENED SEOIOOIC OF YAIOI NRiWCTIW ACTINiLi AE AS FOLLOWS: L INSTALL STAB12M 8001 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAM L NSTAILATION OF STAGE 1 SILT FDICE ARM" SIR L OEM AID a" IESIAP�D O SITE 4 STRIP AND STOOPILE TOPSON- ' S. ROUGH GRADING CE SITE L STAeEUE WORDED AREAS AND STaosafS 7. SMALL SANITARY EWER. WATERYANL STORN SEWER AND SERVICEIL SL N AL EROSION CONTROL AROLID ALL STRUMIREB. / L S1�CTT PARLWID LOTS INSTALL PAVDAW SECTDN / R PAVE SITE �me Wr� +8,,1 Rz INSTALL SEED AND SALON. CL DEN ALL OO/STgCTION ACTIVITY 15 COIPLETE AND M SITE 8 WAY03% REMOVE SET FORE AND RESEED ANY AREAS 01571A® 0 M RO OVA. L SITE OATH: B,. W AREA TO E DWIIENED - L85t W POST I- bje` RPERMOIR ALFA 0.24 m L2 m SL TYPES• SEE sOLS REPORT CIMM 4. M LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO E oBMiFD NAST E IDUMFED STN FLANS. STANCES SIGNS. f SILT PENCIL ETC H70E CONSTRUCTION ECNS 5 01ee S OOHEWIC1101 ACTIVITY - EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES r— TAE M AREA CAN PNAN OPEN MIDI NOT ACTIVELY TYR 6 u t1E 1 STEEPER TAN S'1 7 DAYS DI TO =I M DAPS LATTER THAN IMI M DAYS ® OONOTES SLOPES STEEPER THAN XI 6j95 L ON SLOPES xI ON MATER WINTAN SLEET FLOW AND NO= RILLS A D/OR W"M SLOPE LENGTHS CAM NOT E GREATER THAN 75 FEET. E* 7. ALL STOP DRAM AND INLETS LUST E PROTECTED ONOL ALL SORLQS O POTENTIAL IR501ME AE ® STABI L TEIPORANY STLL3 STOMOMM MIST HAVE UFFCTM SES01T CONTROL AID CAN NOT E RACED N SURFACE WATERS OR STOOL WATER CONVEYANCE S GIS ICANT AYONT O SILT. CLAY. OR ORGANIC o0OA Ot ) DSC T OCOPEEN E S A CrOnElCaATR E SDOI PLEL DENCUTW NIOQTE S70OPLE5 SAND ST000LE* 9. SMIAST LADEN WATER ISM E D60RwOD TO A SFDILID/TATION BASS WHENEVER POSSERL P 7. NOT POSSIBLE, R ILST E TREATED STN M APPROPRIATE SIP'S STgih D. STLD WATER MbT E 0.0OSE0 0 N�EiL7 111D M6T GODLY NTM SPCA OSPOSA EOId001TS V LL DOIOETL ■A9ALT 09ID ML IIOD AIO SOD .ANTE a]G111ED WT m10E'I[ .A9AIT OEIUTNP CL IN A NA L -DROOP NOITAMDIIS TRENT a LP AGE L■ Q A mPACTED D CLAY LINER THAT 0 0 NOT ■ADgR LAWS N ENTER OIQND WRIG O D ®w PERM ARE LOA M LIQUI D AND ILA WASTES MIST NOT CONTACT M ODOQ AN THERE MIST NOT IS MEOW PAN M CONCRETE WADMff O AtI WS N AREAS, AND 0W WASTES MIST DISPOSED or P 1OLRLY ANG CI S WITH REGULATIONS, A SM E LED D rONT TO EACH ■IWWT FACILITY TO INFO S WITH mPSOCT 09LL0 8 To UTILIZE THE PR OM /LDITd CL OIIOMA WADING O THSOM AND aTON C06TrCN01 MINCES ILST E LAMW TO A DERV D AREA O M SITE ROOF MOT E CONTAINED LD WASTE PROPERLY O POSID OJNO BOWE O[OEASINC O ALLOWED ON SITE 6 M OWNER RID OPERAIOI IIIE M 0111E11 ■ND i>00 M APPLICATION IS A PEMETTEE AND 8 E@OP�E FOR COPL111NCE rm lORB LD OOIOTGB OF 710 PTYf. M OPERATOR EOYp�ArILT M OD43M DD SM M APPLICATION 6 A PO Iff"M FUN APPLICATION AND 11 � REM§t OR 6FTIS OF NCIPO®E WAIN M ONWI FOR WPLINIQ WINE THOM POOI00 OF M PENT. LL WYNE NW FDA OpOTSCRO1 PNORCm wpm M ODOR OR MGIITW ONATifs O.O. 6,91 LN OILOPIK EMDPE71 ,n. a PWNTNO O M PROPERTY 70 VAHI08 10E81EDF10 ON SELLS M GIR SITE 10 A NOR OWOa a M OgWJONOT Or01 DMA. PROVO[ A COPT O M CORER IIDIICE O Tee TpENrTO1�EE� NNOfICATIW NON TO M NEW OrOI. M MOOIAICAEDNT a■N01 LMNL B PROVIDE A SNP TOM NEW OWNER AND OPERATOR THAT SPECIFICALLY ADOES4'S M RONIMD OOISIRIICN01 ACTIVITY. IIDTD M NOM O TGRr1AT1ONAMWET MODIFICATION TOM 8191 REPLACKS F�VO011VmW AIDOSIRAIR PEINT TRMLYGA4�GTION AND NO= O \M NEW ONER CA ODLLTOR DILL SAM A COHII[1! AID BMW POW YDRWATON PORTION MOST MODIFICATIONS NUDE SIANWSIMN EONiRATG1 ON PINNY TRANSFER) O M 4 MORTICE O TOENIITNONPMW NCO ATOM FUN TOM IPCA POOR m COILOIONG e COQIDLTp1 AC"A" W DR ER N NO CAM LATER TWIN SING A.7) DAIS AFTER TROD OMM"V Cr THE PROPERTY. M NEW P7YTTEEM LE AEYONMME FEN ONg1ANICE STN ALL TERYL AID CONDITIONS O THIS PTY". SI P M OPERATOR ON GOOPIL CONTRACTOR HAS COPLETW TNOM PORTION O MISS ON M SITE 8 NO LOSING N OPERATIONAL OO TIM O M PROJECT. AND ALL CONiMCNA OBLIGATIONS E11ED1 M 0110 NO OPERATOR MR a7DIA CONTRACTOR SLATED TO COFUAND MTN M AND TMIS 6 MAY TRANWDI OF BLACK Oro �OWNDWI O D ATtWMOPGAT01� M J bTO O TOYNATDNtVII YT MOFICATN POW A aGATLM FRW ROTH M OWNER AND OPERATOR 15 OmEaBE L POW MM "S" TO TUNOI ►R COMIAE aDM THIS POW 1SIST SIELW A NOTICE O TESDIAEOI (RIOT) TO M IPCA (OWlAIIOL riN 110 NOWT 8 EOILIED VTR w NOT m SINaTTED. M PTOffl4'(» WVERAOL TEHIWIIITO Ai 10g1T W M POSTWAOI DAR O M 1107, OI ON M OLIO W OSNE NW 8 SINWTTED 10 M LPG LTDYNIATION O COVERAGE SCCIrrOS :TD■DUTICW O COVGAE FOR M CRIME PROW. ILLL PDYTIQ(Sj M8T SIWNET A NOT STEM W DAYS AFTER RENAL STABILIZATION IONS KEN NONMED ON Ml /ONI00 O M SITE FOR MEW M Pp0■Wa 8 TESPONS9E AND ALL OMOUPCI01 ACTIVITY ILLS ®N COPIE?M E M SITE ENOIDO PERMANENT STOWRATER INLET PROTECTION WN srAMEUAm �� E �� AS (TYPICAL) APENSTIEDS) MST SURNIT A KNOT WITHIN W DAYS AFTER SE11M. M ONTWE SITE w0.1OING ROADS ND WOMWATER NRASTRVCTER NO COVOIAQ 8 mwDOND TO ANOTHER ONG. A TRINATION O OOVONACE FOR A PORTION O M ORR PROJECT. NL POOET1fII5) VAST SNET A NOT THIN S[VER C11 DAR AIRR nZ ON OT0119 IEDNLY 1TI116DOWD PORTIONS O M STE TO Mtl15D1 ►MIT AID T!Y ARE RIO LONGER M OIN0 Y OERATOL M PORTIONS O M SR BONG SOD TO ANOTHER PARTY LUST E N CMPt1LNR rm M PIN■ET (E.0 ALL 7ELPERAO EAOWON PROIECIDI ATD DDLDNT ONTROL N EA9RES MST E ■ PLACE) M TOW M6T NUDE SIOrTUSS FIIOI M QOONA POIIETCI(S) AND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR M NEW OWNER O M PROPERTY. a TOWMATON O COVOVE OBTN01910 A DEOIMDON ROISTRATIO. W PW■T COVERAGE WAS OILiMEO N9r M Dm1eON S1aTRATIM PROMM PRIATTO(S) LE RIMMED TO SWAT A NOT STN W DAYS AFTER AMOD ILA WIAIIATOL IL RISPEc TONS A INITIAL ■ gWICH FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY RFPRE4IITATYF 8 REQUIRED. 8 DPDSED SW LEA& ONCE EVERT 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOLRS FOLLOWING A 0.5. OVER 24 NOBS RAM EWRT. C STABLING AREAL ONCE EVERY SD DAYS C FROZEN WOAD: AS 1001 AS BMNIFF OCLRPS ON PRIOR TO IESAANC Cn6TSCTIO. O. DOMED+ NPRT KEEP RECCES tr ALL PRMm EOIAIIED FCR M PROJECT. ALL INSPECTIONS AND YANTERNIfR Pf]LNANFNT OPFRA701 AND =11DIANCE AG EELDITS. NO REWIRED CACLLATIONS i IESPORATY AND PWrlEINT STORY WATER IIANllftl@1T SY5IOLS TEST RECORDS MST E RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS IS SWPPP MIST E LIDDED HEEL A TIDE 8 A CHANCE N NSW. OPERATIOL W INTENAIRL WEATHER OR SEAS- CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNRICNT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE a INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT M SWPPP 8 NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS D(CEFDINC WATER UJAUTY STANDARDS, C M OWLS N M SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING PCIALTANTS N DISCHARGES ON IS NOT . COISVW WITH M TDM AND CONDITIONS OF M PEOET. TL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ESTIMATED PREIARNARY CIIARTTES TAIKLATIOI ANTICIPATED AT START OF EIE PROJECT FOR M LIFE OF M PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SED001T CONTROL BLIP'S N M STOTP. 2D. AOOITNNA BLIP'S SMALL E INSTALLED FOR PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF AND HAVE ST RRIIATER FLOWS TO NPAMED WATERS SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC 8YP% 2L ALL EVOSED SOTS MST E WADUIID NO LATER THAN P DAYS AFTER M CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY N THAT PORTION OF M DR HAS TRPOMRLY OR PERYA DITLY CEASED. CVS/ MODIFIED RIGHT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH AND WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS 0 52767 CVS STORE S 5788 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN VELMEIR COMPANIES f io-bo —VIN 0 ASSOCIATES EyinyE .. EgYrVW . Nan/ S A NilbSap Aldi4va • NwYIVVImNr Tm .A. IA,■ I m wlTdvi au.m sssa TMWIas O4JN24SSOS I= O43NNdDA �Nri S�r�wA �.riyrawa�Nr +tea scmr n ur— rre—rrwi lw'�`iw�anair� _ urrrr r r�rr•�r� rr�r�iN r N o /m nNNNFaw 4ONo TNNBOArNTnwfUWTTL- WNINE rVAAp,rNn�WaNr NS.■r I r,,.TerrrrrVa WANr.,�ar 1� a aNP l4nNA r,rN■sN W �� uYN r r rrrrNw�A. allu vtll L Van M. P lnas NAO CLr WBS WEIS @I c" 1>61PIa NDNOIP4nAN MEMO.—. 0-2 DOJIOTTON Rw Q.1 9InAN 61 a4a".DN RAN W NODII 2wG. tPIP1 cal —w,w uramnw C)I NTLIPan 11 -1 -1 LANDKANnM II Shm Thle, EROSION CONTROL PLAN (SWPPP) P 14 Loucks Project No 06416 IV- C3-2 h� zml In `Y I 'ulI ?av Sena hwe I � wear ssnH snag UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES • btaAed Pe tM r4pukarrtb d .ne AWReaUaia iM CRV awi tlr .la+dvd 10" VCP SAN S ulsOW getlemtlen d Owe arty DO— Noddlan d MM.ola (CEAMI 1007 Per City As -Butts � SNAIH Per I Rim-877.5 - I Reef C b Sbnw PVC SON 35 IY 41W t . Inv -- .167_0 I IL DIP...et...b m..I n vt Me npueen.nb f AW.W.A .e Alai SAW 1- 3. AA u=, pp. b•ddke dudt be eenq.ded eat a Ore yenar marls pe, the L1 Steno rw poe d a -d d sweed AAWTO U204 mM4noe P40 diffneee Pe ErER STIa aTYA AMU 02412 OOpd f r C -b'. d the CE ea I EISY ID rE:t:P-, 4. AA taNO 9i to adeOq UORIC. dXb be PO FO Per the rapuh —te d Uw k. S Stan a rate ono ea eerily eta A Ytmaad Spadllealks' b, Una ay Oryerae. uWeciatlm d Yen.sa (rEAY} 16--- T lees rAU. e W r.ddata the ceneaucticn eptnav rnat wither the plalk rtyu d eaA a eadl Yrryoea^7 pule ulsilaa I � wear ssnH snag UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES • btaAed Pe tM r4pukarrtb d .ne AWReaUaia iM CRV awi tlr .la+dvd R Rep. Pje Meterki. ulsOW getlemtlen d Owe arty DO— Noddlan d MM.ola (CEAMI 1007 rater swdce e• OF Q -52 Me Ma than 7.5' deg .dNaL N HOPE eae-U- be coed. meads M be eructed with m Eland r fP+•l a by vevq ADS eded.p 7•dr•C N cadre, new nab Srdtay S.ee PVC MR 20 Santa. Stain scan HWE -Wr JOIN 15' daunts. IM dna a SOM S N neater, — -,A- M be SOt 26 r Reef C b Sbnw PVC SON 35 IY 41W t . 2. see Shad Ca-1 end the contract Wednathm be Wattle UOR, ALAe aed ut@y IL DIP...et...b m..I n vt Me npueen.nb f AW.W.A .e Alai t2 SedtwV bee pp Act anfam to "TV =3a 3. AA u=, pp. b•ddke dudt be eenq.ded eat a Ore yenar marls pe, the L1 Steno rw poe d a -d d sweed AAWTO U204 mM4noe P40 diffneee Pe t. W the 3L Al c.Mac�l dr1 be Pefarmed w the ra** —t. AMU 02412 OOpd f r C -b'. d the CE ea 4. AA taNO 9i to adeOq UORIC. dXb be PO FO Per the rapuh —te d Uw k. S Stan a rate ono ea eerily eta A Ytmaad Spadllealks' b, Una ay Oryerae. uWeciatlm d Yen.sa (rEAY} 00} The arty Wpetmad d Gdn ant fidary mgse.n' Ilepebnam end be nelNlod d I.Q•l 4r Ilan. Pb b aq aaY lees rAU. e W r.ddata the ceneaucticn eptnav rnat wither the plalk rtyu d eaA a eadl Yrryoea^7 pule ulsilaa a 'R—..m d StodaA fe Wateede Feart40' by tee Chat Ld- uPpe MWd.* i R er Band ef State Welk Nedth a rmtreenotd Menapaa 2004 Edaat 6. Th. - wocter dell rosy GOPMDt STATE OE CALL at 63-454 -0002 d kart and I..Uk- . 4a here Orte b P. ft. 1h any ®tartar a .d.,F -W wart ls, BeAlbe pn for mot be Instated m erWtMn Rte 6. TM ea trecte fWl MM atpat ..temM to at -S'te .eh male, oea. • .lam sw, aed rdeee InMrMean d eater and MA" eeeer tMs o �r d.0 be prodded epee 7.5 feat rri h-- AWN t>T net be dt*.& Y 7. m .V d moans we pdddnv Mars be pefemad pe er nyhanatu of s&1. arty An V ft anfrd des be ,.elated by th. and ate awi drat W athMl - Per moor ruaesA the r.pu••unsu d tM Uk-et. Marled d Untfann Tr.ma Central Oedaa (MIITm) p aed the alX iha Mat IndvA a0 dOre04 Oarrlmdq sa0 and ""- o needs& m pack Weds des be span b track d 1A Jena Ib reed deeuro urea ereeA de0 be p-Med without lM eepree.ed mtham, Of at the arty e Y Ire -be-n Met Meambh - ef 7.5 fed ef err. -06- 7. AdNd d 56th9 .treehoa bath pna0e and lehale to he propeeel yards where oso s we .err 64..ai d.hebed ed raryly with. r.*A- t. d the utely7 Sb..b o beep r t to peed nee. mud meat care rep*es to fe tmflle W004 S TE e' COINED WATFA SEANCE INTO Y MATER SEANCE REMOVE PIV Are OSTACL WWI* Ftmx EA Alm a' GTE: VALVE e! / �g1 / -STMH Rim =878.1 Inv-- (862.9) 8" Watermain Per Clly As -Belts -1 I I 1- 24" RCP overRor FA­ppr-oxii7ots Location of Underground Infiltration •Trench Are. per Plans )' --15' RCP - -STMH Rim =878.1 Inv=(863.0 N -W) Inv=(860.5 E -W) Inv = (856.3) CBMH Rim -877.3 Inv- -854.8 new am tLmm tes O eerav e1.oa O "•°� ■ ® aoor Tar 0 � 1 chin O ew eseemts .are w cl p colas • o �r � Y nano ee.oA m moor ruaesA p uam nosh O urea ereeA ewrAa 0AI1Q� wme.ro -06- �.a- oso s we .err 64..ai T cue • acv errs au ®a Pumn us an.rs � uu®ruP tOA Imvw o. ooeAp coin so NORTH 0 20 40 %mimmmi SCALE IN FEET CALL BEFORE TOIL Ole Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY ARE& 65 -454 -0002 TOLL FREE: - 800-252 -1168 Cvso pmy 01001HED RKXT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH AND WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS • 52767 CVS STORE • 5788 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN MA VELMEIR COMPANIES Aebe.attrwil0rrrd ASSOCIATES Re • Ckd TepA-elrr • Ire L-ft t,.r>o.A.dtM - ----d 7Ae lewe.d m -sro lm wrreyaw,.4..ee. 5369 Tawb -mou. am - rs oaw:.su7 NNa lltltMYYIM NYIO tF4tO.stf MNRJYnA Vll�le riel.wdePaaAw1�78W1 tefteeft ror.ear -eedr eeweerae-r.ee -. wPwraewwr r w. a eS Ibe�.rwurAwe eiy� -rb b � ebel•w1bw... yldlL Va or -R a3ss uus. ra aib WEIS VMS tca %qV 4/21110 m1 maraca a.t Opfipi cVaix114MM C11 pBdnp114e1 w sin 1tAM Cm 17at.rc4P.MUa MaI 00 iM)p[Mmllxpl Mrmevt w rmmrtw a1 W .7Em LlJ tArDWf win T . UTILITY PLAN Loucks Project No 06416 Iva_ C4 -1 1 .. ■ r oo/■seur /r w.rsoss fl.v lea wm Fce 110)dA . • . ,. FI/Y 11f11PUSmv Or A{p1CCArE dtSE (C4fl e a n �T■ IY YAO■Y A- ARAVATE am (CLASS S 0 r) r fC11m1AE f0'VC - R c S" SOUSE D �� 4S O.nD (S0l b PVC) f¢ MOTE alu -nar �rol . i : uaw-UM BIRY/Om PAYBBFT BECIION! CONCiEM BCEWALK 8E3CIlON ►AIBO( ►�IOOM�(N AUaBO(6.7eSUL 1@OR DAIED NNO(4 SM O smr■[v PSc v 1...111 s�E I i ■Q AM f2 wim . 1 .. v FDR ALL OU nO OF CORR U33 DAN TND W ,� i i I I 1 /Z• PET, PPE I ST E SMImCE tl E P P41 3•r 0MRS R• 00101 UWAlB1 O M TWO (2) PET. „� P IaPS FLEM E FK MAY DSn. REFER W Y Uv11S133am : •- Ar (, VEOPICAM G FOR AILGSUHE vi4 TYPE& _ `: _ _ NnDOT 8612 ■. A UA101 -TIOIT 00![01101 slue E SANrARxED . ; A":'t r:: {'� .maATE ■A4 (awa S m 7 I /2 -r Concrete curb ... i - ISM VC TO 1■A119141 M T SS[0■E AD P1c and gutter Rs[ ro Awr ono rec Tlvc C• SAND a °•e . a DC ooOdOR CQLW= 01 S ML E ., - ... RsrAlsm eErvlE a RloRIlsPelrn PIIE ■6GUID . • . : i i HT7WY-0YIY BIIUMINM PAVEMENT BECIION a ES ONS0 4 s¢oa rn 7% AND s1AU. E IeY01$E rDn ALL ■C1w To. AC ■ELUO■4 . �AYBBI ►�.- (dEM ®alBf xIR01f ►Gl ®Y N�� CUB�.TM CK M®R SOEOL YL■C9=CCN C1A 9 C E im Roo E Fo■ M aol.EC■orl AT nE P01r a nc RRtuDIT srAmA DOWNSISQJf CONNECTION DIMENSIONS TD FACE OF THIS ONN PLANS ARE TO 6 %6 1 VL4xV1A 1 WVF i ._ .. SEE PLAN 11/2' RAD Imas CONCRETE Rpm SAN m 1 I 1 NOTE- m'a°$t■uz. .°1:■ i 5 PROVIDE DUMMY L 6' 6• "'� °p1'°°fL i I EXPANSION JOINTS AS ..a SNOVN ON PLAN OR .....' ..... - SIDEWALK DETAIL i . WATHYAN 0108M WTAL . 8TRAKNT KfEQVL CONCRETE! CM AND OCEW r CVS/ p NOOIFIED RIGHT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH MW WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS 952767 CVS STORE 9 5766 CIIY OF EO1NA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN NmnW 0 VELMEIR COMPANIES Rtr■lenDw.bplr■ xa ASSOCIATES llIft. �lff b.&d1k-Aft 13m Iw++la lw -irr m IIY..grl4 wwm rrynus V6W3N50 fm fs OWI. 74y33 � Mww.r rarOra� iD■. NNS 011.1n LLftW Yl ■o C.flORBItn.VIf111Srf / l y1y10 SwY•/O�V•e.Sw�1m•il r+.egrrrn. vsrrv.Prr. 1 AA.A*f fwd•b�E uiYrYri. rrwrrAr�r Ydll Vm Oe■ -R 413" L__ Cab I Quality Control, WB5 W65 01 COIL SIHT CI.1 R1R1wOR3>b1A6RW CI.3 OAgnl(>IRW UI SIR RW OI Cf1AOPCAn■..xAa ILIIa Cu ISD110x [Drul■OInMIT�RI CA, URTRRW I She" 61 [RN ♦HR ll�l IAI■tlCAR RAN r . DETAIL SHEET Na Loucks Project No 06416 Shl NIL' C8 -1 GENERAL NOTES ALL RANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING OETAIIS ANDSCAPE PLAN: - - 1 1 V °OSfING TREfS� . WEST 69TH STREET EXISTING KIitBS� CONTRACTOR SHALL D B SITE PRIOR ro SWATH EMIG I NG HE WRAPPING THAN THE TREE BEG PROTECTED TED PVC QUALITY, HEAVY. R SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR NATURE R AND WITH PE OF G IN CANER OFA4 TEE A EE BEING FACURE O QUALITY, PURPOSE. BY OTHERS �� �� CONDITIONS RELATING ro THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF wtKIL WATERPROOF S THE PAPER MANUFACTURED TED IN THE FOR THIS 12-1 A D wRM ALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTED IN TEE fALi PRIOR ro 12 -1 AND rrrrr----�_ LANDSCAPE DETAILS: i i I i i PRUNE DAMAGE) AND CRO59W BRANCHES AFTER PLANKING S COMPLETE CUT BACK WIRE BASKET REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND IABRLING FROM TREE WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. RACE BACKF W S AND SATURATE S IL WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN RUMS. 1642' POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WISE MULCH. 4- DEEP - PER SPEC. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SET RANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SKML CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFYIANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE UP • I•47 LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLAITING SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE ROCK( MULCH - r DEEP - SEE SPEC- LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE SPEC EDGING MATERIAL - SEE SPEC EDGE VARIES - REFER TO RAN Iands�caa eforms° wrm:�.. ALL RANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION H DRIED BONE MEAL OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PANTING SOIL PER ME MANUFACTURER .INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION Of GRANULAR 0.20-20 O 12 OZ PER 2.7 CALIPER PER TREE AND 6 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-10-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER PERENNIALS, ANNUALS. AND/OR VINE SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF C DEPTH OF RANTING SOIL CONSISTING O AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL. 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. LE: PROTECT ALL EASING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PANT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TC BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY I NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATE ARE UNAVOIDABLE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. Cvs/ phey ACIDIFIED RIGHT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH AND WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS B 52767 CVS STORE B 5788 QTY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES A R &.Dw.fp-v IES ASSOCIATES 14+Ir` . ON f� . UnNinrF6B Ia16t� A <Mbmw • (riYra6+I )ABMe/bd L41e ->ar m w.rge114 M:.m fSMf TJg1rI�PUMl�SfOf I4c /WIN -SDI r.rAV —emr �— ��ar..orrNrn �rrrLHrgrw �. Rev r WWO SRI nAIVYNM iPO olYeanertMxx�lurm ylWa en1�/I+btr4Yr 5N.� / r.rN rRN r r pr prr s srl � / .. / M Herr I.Nry Aa+r rr r r rrr6rrs M17 VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER il. OyS OF THE IASCAPE ARCHITECT ANY 06CIMPANCB3 WHICH ATTENTION NND MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN ANCIOR INTENT OF THE PROMM BLACK POLY EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERfNeNI" - - -- - LAYOUT. - AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SODYSEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - -- - ---- - - ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS ALL PLANTING BEDS To RECEIVE r DEEP 11S' RIVER ROCK MARCH IATP4CObID/6nAn GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. AND FIBER AMT WEED BARREIL C24 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL DU5TING ROADS. CURBWGUTTERS ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4- DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH — — TRAILS. TREES. LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. ' C/I OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST b/ mr ISKTI TO THE OWNEEL SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE EIEEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MLACHED AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND RIVER ROOK MULCH AS NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CO STRLCILON / MATERIAL SPECEIEOANDICATED ON DRAWING 0414 SPECFICATIOK INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM IB - Cr UEARANCE1 VERIFY E IU710N SYSTEM LAYOUT AND I ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID 50 THAT T4ENOHFS Do ii IIMIA O IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS Of ANY EXISTING TREES TO WINGS. SOP DRAWINGS � RFAWK LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN N, EXISTING CONTOURS. TRAILS, VEGETATIO Cl1RBALY1fIFR AND OTHER IRRIGATION LAYOUT PAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE I .I EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLED TO SHALL POUT WHEN BOOING MESS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE . T ,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY SCOPE A LANDSCAPE ORDER ANOOI IBIRITY ION. R PE AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE HxKNTRA[TORS REPOIV$m4ITY ro ENSURE E LANDSCAPE COT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS. TRAILS . PROPERLY. INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNOATION- CONFORM To LOCALIZED TOPOGRAP(C CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND CJIADING. ANY CHANCE IN ALIGNMENT THE CONTRACTOR 5H1ALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A j MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WATERINGiLAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQW REMENTS LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR S CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY — NT COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND RANTING OTHER SITE CONDITION WHEN MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING NTT. ESTABLISHMENT. SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE HE MUST BRING THESE N O PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE LADING AND DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION O THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR IWAUATIOK CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA WHERE SOD/ . ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION O ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD I' BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, IMPROVEMENTS. $I". CURB, ETC. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE O ALL SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER MAN TFIOSE NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME O OWNER ACCEPTANCE - AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GIADINa SOD OR SMLL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A Co.. TAAC TOR. MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING. BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED - _ —I SHALL BE LAP) PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL NAVE TO. PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND OREASUPFSTT CONTROL. STAGGERED JOINTS ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN I:I OR IN DRAINAGE - SWALES, THE 500 SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THRONG/ ONE ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOOL AMERI CAN WARRANTY HONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS I ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT TFE ARCHITECT AFTER ME COMPLETION CIF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE I SPECIFIED SHRUB HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE No V MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. - CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 2' ABOVE ROOT BALL STREET AND BOULEVARD TREE SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING REPRODUCIBLE DRAOVEME OF ALL LANDSCAPE NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE pVSTALLATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND SITE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATE FOR SPRING . NOTE. PANE MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEECIA00 PLACEMENT IS FROM j- _ ALL PROPOSED RAMS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ME TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 1 S. ON PLAN. ALL TREE ARE REQUIRED TO BE STAKED SIAM 1 STAKES FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - 40 SPACED EQUALLY AROUND THE TREES, NOVEMBER I. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15- SEPTEMBER IS: NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTiTUT10N6 WILL BE ACCEPTD UNLESS DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO APPROVAL IS REQUESTED O ME LANDSCAPE ARCHITER BY THE NOVEMBER 1. PLANTING OUTSIDE THEE DATES S NOT RECOMMENDED. J LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMLLSSHK; OF A BIO ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE AND/OR QUOTATION. ARCHITECT. FEET M ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PRA MATERIALS MAY BE C ONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGLUST 15.00TOBER 1 NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE AND FALL DECIDUOLA PLANTING FROM THE FIST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PANTING OUTSIDE THEE DATE IS NOT RECOMMENDED. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MIST BE NOTIFIED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL RANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION H DRIED BONE MEAL OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PANTING SOIL PER ME MANUFACTURER .INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION Of GRANULAR 0.20-20 O 12 OZ PER 2.7 CALIPER PER TREE AND 6 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-10-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER PERENNIALS, ANNUALS. AND/OR VINE SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF C DEPTH OF RANTING SOIL CONSISTING O AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL. 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. LE: PROTECT ALL EASING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PANT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TC BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY I NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATE ARE UNAVOIDABLE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. Cvs/ phey ACIDIFIED RIGHT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH AND WEST 69TH STREET CVS CS B 52767 CVS STORE B 5788 QTY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES A R &.Dw.fp-v IES ASSOCIATES 14+Ir` . ON f� . UnNinrF6B Ia16t� A <Mbmw • (riYra6+I )ABMe/bd L41e ->ar m w.rge114 M:.m fSMf TJg1rI�PUMl�SfOf I4c /WIN -SDI r.rAV —emr �— ��ar..orrNrn �rrrLHrgrw �. Rev r WWO SRI nAIVYNM iPO olYeanertMxx�lurm ylWa en1�/I+btr4Yr 5N.� / r.rN rRN r r pr prr s srl � / .. / M Herr I.Nry Aa+r rr r r rrr6rrs M17 Prl[ap -APIA I—NU OyS TIT TIT PAK T.� vid.ft ma , ml HXMSIIQT EI�1 IATP4CObID/6nAn C24 RIIFLUS [11 OAORL / /S.YN4Q AAN LAN IRIRVICa+nOI n+N/Mn C/I IIILTR A W b/ mr ISKTI ll -I MVDRNEn Seel 7olr. LANDSCAPE PLAN Np: Loucks Project No 06416 No.: L1 -1 of Ie •,vv • �rox�a REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.F.2. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Set Hearing (10/19/2010) Planning Items: Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning, YMCA 7355 York Avenue ACTION REQUESTED: Set hearing date for October 19, 2010. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The YMCA is requesting preliminary rezoning and preliminary development plan approval for the purpose of building a 15,300 square foot addition to the existing building. ATTACHMENTS: See attached: Staff report and plans. l 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 29, 2010 2008 - 012.10 Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description The YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. The property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non- conforming; -a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. (See location, applicant narrative and plans on pages Al A21.) A health club is a permitted use within a POD. In 2009 the City .Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from' Low - Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild anew YMCA with a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The YMCA has abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to the existing YMCA facility. (See previously approved preliminary plan on page A22.) In order to obtain the above- mentioned approvals, the applicant must go- through a two -step process. That process is as follows: Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning_ This application requires a three -fifths vote of the City Council. 2. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning_ The Final Development Plan & Rezoning process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. A three -fifths favorable vote of the City- Council is also required. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Yorktown Park and Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided park. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Yorkdale Townhomes and single - family homes; zoned and ..guided low & medium density housing. Westerly: 7500 York Senior Housing; zoned and guided high density housing. Existing Site Features The subject property: is 5.94 acres in size and contains a 66,800 square foot YMCA facility. (See page A3 —A5.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Zoning: R -1, Single- Dwelling District Parking Health clubs are required 6 parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square' feet of gross floor area for all other uses. There are two racquetball courts and 63,920 square feet.of other uses proposed within the'YMCA. Other uses include the pools,. gymnasiums, exercise areas, office space, .meeting rooms, and kid's areas. Therefore_ , 332 parking spaces are required: on the site. The plan shows here would be a total of 332 parking stalls (See page Al2.) . Access /Circulation Access to the site would. remain through the existing two drive entrances off York Avenue. Circulation would remain generally the same as exists today with parking areas on the east:and west�side. of the building. The main building entrance to the YMCA would face York Avenue. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed site plan and recommends several changes. (See page A22a and A22b.) An east/west pedestrian walkway should be added from York Avenue to the building. This would be similar to the plan provided in the traffic study on page A71. This would provide a safer pedestrian connection in the front parking lot, and from York Avenue. To accomplish this sidewalk, removal of parking spaces -would be required. However, a proof -of- parking agreement could be utilized to ensure K that there would be adequate parking for the site. If parking were to become a problem.in the future, additional stalls.. could be added. The City Engineer also suggests that the north entrance be reconfigured, and that the drive circulation in the east parking lot should be reversed. All drive aisle width and parking stall dimensions must meet minimum city standards on the final development plans. Grading /Drainage /Utilities There are no significant changes to the existing grading, drainage or utilities on the site. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to „the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A22a. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan review. Landscaping The applicant is proposing additional landscaping around the.building and perimeter of the site. (See page A13.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 51 over =story trees are required. The applicant is proposing 47 over -story trees, not including four (4) Elm trees shown on the plan. Elms are not considered over -story trees by the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, four additional over - story trees must be,added. -This could be made a condition of approval. A full compliment of under -story trees and shrubs are proposed around the building. Amore detailed review would be done as part of. the Final Development Plan review. Building /Building Material The addition would be designed to fit in, or match with the existing building. The new building would be made of brick, metal and concrete panels. Windows would be added to the front of the building. (See renderings and building elevations on page A10.) The proposed building, materials are considered acceptable by the Zoning Ordinance which requires the,following: "All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: face brick; natural stone; specially designed pre -cast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction if the panel materials are any of those noted above; or glass or pre ' -finished metal other than unpainted galvanized iron).” "AII subsequent aditions, exterioraIterations and accessory build'ings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall' be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance." 3 Compliance Table 4 City Standard (MDD -5) Proposed YMCA - setbacks Front Setback — York Avenue 35 feet 200+ feet Xerxes Avenue 35 feet 100+ feet Side — South 29 feet (building height) 100+ feet Side —North 29 feet (building. height) 60 feet Building Height 4- stories or 50 feet 29 feet & 1 -story Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet (Xerxes side to be adjusted) 10 feet (interior) 10 feet (interior) west lot has an existing parking area with a 5 -foot setback) Building Coverage 30% 22% Parking Stalls 7- Health Club Six (6) parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per. 200 square feet,of 332 parking stalls proposed gross floor area for all_ other uses. 332 spaces required 4 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed preliminary rezoning and development plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The YMCA has existed on the site since the early 1970's, and has fit well with the mixture of uses in the area. The rezoning would make the YMCA a conforming land use. Health Clubs are a permitted use within the POD -1, Planning Office District. Other. permitted uses include office buildings, medical clinics, day care, and schools. The POD District is a less intense zoning district in regard to allowed uses, than the previously proposed PCD, Planned Commercial District, which would have allowed commercial and residential uses in addition to the YMCA. 3. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed Use. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study based on the previously proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed that document to determine if it was accurate. Both Spack and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the addition to the YMCA. (See traffic study on pages A32 —A71.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on August 19, 2010, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the minutes on pages A23 —A26.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Preliminary Development Plan. Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has been the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. Deadline for a City decision: December 21, 2010 0 `�I FL R za UR City of Edina 7430 PID:3202824240002 7355 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 EXIST)NG 24NtwG Legend House Number Labels Street Nome Labels _J City Limits Creaks Lake Names Lakes E1 Parks Zoning APO IA.t.m.ka. P� , 9 Digri.0 MDO -CIMww Omd.Pm.nt Dinr;ctl ■ MDO.51 ,h d D.wbPm.nt Oie _- ■ MD0-Gjtii .d Dmabpmw e-abictj ■ PC0-11Pt.nnod C.mmacal0etr1I ■ PC0-21Pounned C.nensreiutOM �1 PCO.7IPbnn.tl C.mma�0iprial ® PCO -A4PI. dC. =cWOMWj PmiPJmn I d.VnWDdt, II Q Pon -11 Offi=Dlunal :.d POO- 21Punn.d Oec.DMrinl ■ PAO- 11Pbnn.tl A.sdwtW DFJrs11 ■ PAD- 2SPbnnnd A.eA.nlW Dipr:tl ■ PA071Pbnn.tl Amdd.ntW Dipsial ■ PAO-dlPbnn.d A.d ,WDi4,.Ml ■PRO.51P -..d A.ed.ft Otrtnnl ® PSk- aSPbnnA Saniur 0iclrill P- 11S:npm 4usMing Unnl ■ A- 21Daukb Dw.11lrtg Undl AMO IAagi. nd At.did OiW'01 Percals 2009 Aerial Photo EXIST)NG 24NtwG , ITI ;:1 650 `��i :p'..%� 24 ,'� �41 R 7599 0o i11 r SOS - .. 4's 10'6 7117 717 . 24 4 •501 24 ►1 !y Z. s' b i F14 p� laycgt� 24471) I 0, 313 • 309 X305 1100 T2q 1109' 604 OJ 7401 7400 7405 7404 f 000.r600 -24 a, "ih;�PA 1 r u y12i; 9+1133i8�414525 '8089� 909 408 24 S19 t► c aar+ 515 "�'�.;� 7355 . 7599 0o i11 SOS - .. 4's n.. ^,• •501 0, 313 • 309 X305 1100 �_ ty' . 7401 7400 7405 7404 7409 7404 i,_._x 6 f •�'�' 7413 7412 � 7125 7430 "- 7429 7474 !, - • -,�_ '- - - 7433 7438 h•1t{t ,1ls cas.>d nn rt5 ay^gt,Cl -D9.S C1f5dD5.sy, .:,,o.. 7 . ®1 Iq l l� t 4 0 ��l ��4 ��I ` .r+ � <.��1•`rf � t� � I V' ,�' `fit - I I imp IWO f'1 1'w W V ,� O I V � fit, York Ave AS "Yofk'AV'( York Ave S XWexes A aw . �74 : YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Association Services 30 South Ninth Street linneapolis, MN 55402 12 -371 -8700 fax: 612- 371 -8716 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Expansion Project Preliminary Development Plan Review & Rezoning Dear Mr. Teague, August 27, 2010 A. YNICA We build strong lads, strong families, strong communities. 3C 37 T� � �\ �cF .`� ac 40 PTV Q Please accept the following and attached information as required submittal for Preliminary Development Plan Review and Rezoning for the property owned by the Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis located at 7355 York Avenue South. Project Overview The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis ( "YMCA's is a 150 year old organization and currently operates llfacilities in the Minneapolis and greater Minneapolis area. The YMCA provides a variety of programs serving children, adults, and seniors. The YMCA is experiencing growth and needs to update their existing facility and is proposing an expansion of their building on the existing site. The proposed expansion will provide a more efficient facility for the YMCA to operate and provide programs and services to the Edina community and surrounding area. The proposed development is consistent with surrounding uses and the City of Edina's comprehensive Plan for the area. The proposed facility expansion will add 15,398 square feet to the existing facility for a new total building size of 82,100 square feet. The expanded and remodeled facility will include: • New 5,300 sf leisure pool • A 9,000 sf expansion to accommodate a new fitness center and studios • Remodeling of most of the existing spaces within the existing facility Current Conditions The proposed 5.71 acre property is currently occupied by a 2 -story 68,400 square foot YMCA facility built in 1972 and contains a surface parking lot with 324 spaces. Rezoning Currently the site is zoned R -1. The YMCA proposes to rezone the parcel to POD (Planned Office District) for the purposes of expanding the current facility, but maintaining the same operation use. The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The site will include 322 parking spaces on grade per the attached site plan in the rezoning submittal. YMCA Southoale Expansion Project Letter to Cary Teague — August 27, 2010 Site & Building Plan Review Site Preparation The site for the proposed YMCA facility expansion is located on the existing YMCA property on York Avenue South. The expansion will occur at the north end of the building. The City Fire Station, skate park, and City Park are located along the north side of the property, Xerxes is located along the east edge of the site, single and multiple family housing is located along the south side of the site. The YMCA will remain in operation during the facility expansion. Site Access and Circulation Access to the site is provided by York Avenue. Currently, there are two access drives to the site. The access drives will remain in the same locations, but the parking lot layout will be modified to accommodate the facility expansion as well as additional parking stalls. Please refer to the attached site plan. Building Heights The maximum height of the proposed facility expansion is 28 feet above finish grade. Site Coverage Per section 850.14 Subd 6.A (City of Edina Code), the total site coverage allowance for the buildings is 30% maximum. The following is a breakdown of the building coverage for the proposed development: 39,000 SF Existing YMCA footprint 15,400 SF Proposed YMCA expansion 54,400 SF Total Proposed footprint —or- 54,400/248,000 site SF = 22% Parking Per Section 850.08 Subd 1. A & 0 (City of Edina Code) the parking requirements for the YMCA are: Six spaces per court for all racquetball, tennis, & handball courts = 12 spaces One space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. Gross square feet for all "other uses" is 58,526 sf = 293 spaces Total parking requirements per the code for the project = 305 spaces The current site plan shows a total of 332 spaces which meets the City's requirements for the proposed facility expansion. Additionally, the site is on a major bus route that provides great access to the public transit system as well as connected to major pedestrian trail systems within the City. Grading The proposed grading is similar to the existing site conditions, which slopes from West to East. The proposed expansion will maintain the current floor elevation is the facility. Drainage Storm water is proposed to be detained in underground infiltration storage tanks located beneath the rear parking lot. Page 2 of 4 YMCA Southdale Expansion Project Letter to Cary Teague — August 27, 2010 Utili The YMCA facility is currently served by the City of Edina water and sanitary sewer from York Avenue South and Xerxes Avenue South respectively and will continue to receive these utilities from their current locations. Water Service Adequate water service for the proposed YMCA expansion will be provided for the existing service currently providing water service to the facility from the west edge of the site. Sanitary Sewer Service There is an existing 12 -inch sanitary sewer located on Xerxes that serves the current and proposed facilities. Geotechnical A series of soil borings have been conducted on site at or near the proposed structure expansion. Landscaping A landscaping plan and planting schedule is provided with the submittal plans and meets the minimum standards of the City Code. The majority of the existing landscaping will remain. Signage Building signage is proposed for the new fagade on the West side of the building. Site signage will remain the same as it is currently. Green & Sustainable Building Systems The YMCA intends to utilize Green & Sustainable principals through the design and construction of the new facility expansion. Neighborhood Meeting A meeting with the surrounding neighbors will be conducted at the Southdale YMCA in September prior to the Planning Commission meeting. A mailing to all residents surrounding the facility will be sent to the neighbors one week prior to the meeting date. Thank you for your time and consideration with this proposal and the City's continued support of the YMCA. If you should have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612.371.8724. You may also contact our representative, Steve Dorgan, of CresaPartners listed below. Sincerely Anita Lancello Bydlon Representative: Steve Dorgan Principal, CresaPartners 80 South 8th Street, Suite 850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612.373.0287 Email: sdorgan(d)cresapartners.com Page 3 of 4 Attachments YMCA Southoale Expansion Project Letter to Cary Teague —August 27, 2010 A) Survey with Existing Conditions Plan B) Site Plan C) Floor Plans D) Proposed Building Elevations E) Landscape Plan F) Civil Plans G) Grading, Utility, & Drainage Plan H) Color Renderings of Elevations I) Photos of Existing Site J) Building Materials Samples /Photographs Page 4 of 4 A'\ (i) -77 ... . . .......... 44" 1 44W ,I. S..thd.k YMCA Edi..,?Ai—ft.. BWB ARCHITECTS '3 .0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING IMAGES A5 r E_ --.: ` r... ii--------- --- --------------------- - -�."— �'— •e_— = - - - -+ ' I Ile I I OUTLOT C t� '> `IV Op 1 r I I I � • i i r� i y� 1'� /i tr I j I f� r r i r �t � o L1 1 rc Cd \j Lot / t r' g / B L O !/K 4 7.. F MW AVEME swum $ r oo 1p 4 - — S 'r. _p - .�' I- Imo... -:� i � ....... � -' :_ J � � z l/ )�, R� �, �• �\� �°'��+.� �-� j �° � / I >►', � v� '� - - - - -- r - -- loo Is INI 1 rI .dI �� •� 4 S C ) - m _ r� =�ss� Ynra :s v ems c t9P34 yD°L' } rmrp' v S9IJ7 gg • �A :. ® `,.-: .•O 4,y 2 INTERFAN. I I 0 I ! ? )f um CONNECT 70 Eft RtR■ CWIECf TO NEW CONLRETE WALK $ _ WPM1 J !1r i � I i f r NEW A T f • : NEW CONCRETE wux NEW ASPILY7 .g '� • HC RAIP `" I 7 24.9' ' ••azi/!; ^..SZ .H. �• A4 i p_ 1l svx.. o i 666p RELOCATE UGHT y B wmx y FIRST F iN_t911� t FL-03R 9703 F q rETAIN L 8585 C IE HC RAMP �• "'.i /, O A. T j a ` 7MS YORK AVENUE SOUTH if ;4 � $• z smrY v 82 17.'3 -�F �' I w ✓ ............r. m -- 1..� s AI YB PATH ro Eo. 1 , A � � 1 I eABfCB �Lb Ia I � i � I �' S897i4R'■ 27571 I I , 74th St. W I N:. t0 To PiLDipr PcCOiG3fT C: MF7E( EAOI RGV 6 F-C-3 R 9C A� SOS r I .A= < Y tM Tip ROM) F LINING WALL e E GENERAL NOTES: SITE PLAN .Or TDTAL NUMBER OF OLSTING PARONG STALLS 124. �)•� .02 TZTTAL NUMBER OF STALLS AFTER ADDITION 337 .03 SIZE OF EEL S7M BLADM 19,023 SRYRE FEET. .N SIZE OF ADIXOON 22,010 STOUARE FEET. o le 1B e n .05 SQE OF B'UEDM AFTER ADDITION 55.249 SQUIRE FEAT. SCOTe CD Feet LEGEND .DO K�� INCREASE 2 PORDN -MG RE MD SOLARE FEET E DDW- N .07 PROPOSED NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS CC "AM i,.467 SL FT. f PROP= CUM AND amTA LEGEND FOR EXISIT'NG ITEMS M TOP OF CURB (0 ® CATER Bh9N — '~—STORY SEWER FROPOSM RETAVQQ W%LL M TOP OF WALL O STORY MANHOLE —'— SANITARY SEWER © PROPOSED PAR04 HALO. MUNT CE CFD4R O SWTAA! WNHDLE — I — WATFRYYN SP SPRUCE O HYCRAl4i CL\vERT TR TREE (GCN) M GATE NALVE RET . WALL PROPOSED t" MICRETE M;FACE Wt WILLOW ■ POW7R POLE —UNDERGROUND 'ELECTRIC PROPOSED NEw ASNIAIJ SPACE CONiERDUS TEE O LOHT FOLE — :— uIWJF31GiiWnO GAS Q TMO LCW —FORCE OWN / P.VGOAG: STR9WD C .-I000US WE O Ui— Y4+HW.0 U p ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER —Rmm — R A I LOUTLET O POST WCIFATLRt "I"' Q ar+. SPOT ELEVATON \ r Q u—� 1/1 POI A 14 .NU W d�.•. `\ t� o BwDrts Wo, uauYQlr E d' t Qi BDIO:ES r.wmlc STALL � u, O..rol IIENGTV wIOBIAnoN As SN �` f�� `� OP A,N4 .DT DdR uD)tE BP'UU �1 � 44 \� CALL 48 Hm'w BEFORE O'=Na: 'rGAUAwN[ SAUDI .RAR lJ c 9rl T�4� dtt w- v�E GOPHER STATE ONE CALL wBr nLV n9 rt tG Y o n4 ® 1 e TON aR AREA (ee,) 4sc YDAIESOTA 7771 FIFE 1- 800 -252 -1165 1 E7�gLCL c°'" o� gz,;�' L 4 S 1 7 VV Co .s Olt t N a REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS ONE TREE PER 40 L.F. OF LOT PERIMETER LOT PERIMETER = APPROX. 2042 L.F. LOMYON NAME 2042 / 40 r 51 TREES REQUIRED TREES EXISTING TREES ON SITE = 37 LANDSCAPE TREES REQUIRED = 14 1 SSC Md.. 'Spring S..., LANDSCAPE TREES PROVIDED = 15 2- TOTAL TREES ON SITE = 51 2 SGM A- . frwmorim 'Sienna' FOR BUILDINGS OVER 24' HT. r1 5% OF 14 TREES: LESS THAN 2" DIA. _ .7 Q 25% OF 14 TREES: 2.5" DIA. OR 6' HT. - 3.5 0 8 25% OF 14 TREES: 3.5" DIA. OR 8' HT. - 3.5 3 6 20% OF 14 TREES: 4.5" DIA. OR 10' HT. = 2.8 2 D 207. OF 14 TREES: 5.5" DIA. OR 12' HT. = 2.8 32 0 PLANT LIST: Site Plantings 0- NE1 eOiAwCµ RAME LOMYON NAME SIZE/RODi TREES 1 SSC Md.. 'Spring S..., Spring Snow Crabapple 2- Bala 2 SGM A- . frwmorim 'Sienna' Sianno Glen Map. 2 -1 /2' O&B 2 CH Cetis occidanldis Conman Hackbw" 2 -1/2' 13" 4 AP Pinus nlgro Austrian Pin. 6' -D• Ime 6 OHS P,cea glas= denwla Black Hills Spruce 6' -D• B6ia SHRUBS 13 DIVE Euwymus Bows 'Campoclui Dwarf W ged Euonymus 5 Col. Pot 6 AM Hydrangea orbonewme 'Annabelle Atmobelle Hydrangw 5 Gal. Pot 15 AWS Spba.a . bomalda 'Anthony Water./ Anthony Waterer Spew 5 Dal. Pot 23 SJ Juniparus sabino 'Scandia' Scondla Juniper 5 Gal. Pot PERENNIALS & GRASSES 55 KFG Cdwnagrosli. aculi9wa 'Kwl Fornlar' Karl Forester Fgather Bow Gross 1 Go- Pat 39 BD Memmeracplla 'Baja' Bap Day16y I Go. Pal 5 BYS Rudbackio rulgido 'Gddelurm' &ack -eyed Su.on 1 Go. Pot PLANTING NOTES: ,:on—tor mw pr — on. ywr gurmt.s of au aunt -t.dd. Bn. gorant.s beg.. on In. ddo of In. tdnd.cap. MNINCt's radon ac Wtor.a of th. Filial planting Rpl000nmt plant matrkL, mall also Ann o cos year qurml.. wmmoncng upon plontin, All pails 1. is Minn ... 1. grown and hrtly. Plants to b. natW.d as p.r stand— MN planting — tit... Uos -ir—n 12' team Planlnq soil on Vies and 6' an Wpb. Can4o:tr .not wrify location, will, dl ulil.ka prior to installation W plants. A. landscaping and .ad red..kall M Yngal.d NN an undrgrwntl yrnYMr. Sinkng of boas opliand: rprMllon If -1 plural olio on. yar. NYay a. smooth-brkM boos (e lap and bait —. R.mow by Ara 1. Open LIP al bunaP m W mires% I. — Pot an polled plonlp .pill and break eprl post Pal. PN pants as n.c...ry - pr stallion nuns,, r«lla. (i,nr anal its nryanrbl, la, maintel, . stir — splanc. of on, oork by U a . nr. Plants ahau b. mm.dially Plonlw upon arrl.d It silo. Pr.yrly Fool -n molrio. it n.cososry. A. datunod r.as la b. lalaol led... alhrola. —oo. sad mou bo nwth.m groan and hrtly Hignlond ... no post sad dla. Plwwg bads Ir shmba mdl na.. (4 .1. nn.) run burl« font, 4' - 6' or ouMa mnaded nob broon hrdraad mulch and 4' .rticol (eanrnrclal gmd,) Mack pay sdglng No .dghg .hdl as placed and atok.d wi..manU curers. A hvtlrand mulch lr.. den mall is ln, M sd .rwnd all boss. No macn dish snal Is a nhimun, al fi' in diann.lo, 4' -6' dory, and shell not cam. In wnlact with In. bunk. S.. Planing D.lolla R.loinng rat. r. not U. n.ponablity of lM I.and.am. Arcbllosl. C tot tM Prgl.et Engn.r for ashes, location. malrld. - sp.draalbn. far dl nto" erg. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SH IM JIM Scti. h y.r 1 N 1�. gm si� (�1C43�CrT.. rIIII i(I }� W -_ - L�ZTJLiS6'Y'O� v SOUTHDALE YMCA BWOR s.e"'a...�i.... s... u p lster ulvxsnl c..rhr. if 194 En9 'l,9, Tic Will) NB set LANDSCAPE PLAN 2021S • cnir.w..ww`wa. r� I 1 I I II in Q —1- f �\ I I I I &et BTaE SO J. ' rATCH Fm FF 970.5 I 999 I I FF 858.5 X19/ SLT FEW=--,A I it MS YraW AVENUE SOUTH 2�Y I�% J Nisi .1 I! I I NSULL WIICV GTOI BA91L5 \ _ I I' II s �� �� Y I I T4 15R I iw I 1 , I�T LEGEND 201z; GRADING AND EROSION COMROL PLAN S d. TR F..t 640 PROPOSED MMURS PROPOSED CURB AM ourrER GENERAL NOTES: 01 TE COMTR CIDR STRAIT. CONTAOT ALL UILRY COMPANIES AMD HAVE SAM COMPANIES LDCATE ALL MMES (MMUC X ,OTLA7 PROPOSED SPOT ELEYATOM AND PRNA1Fj 9WUC ANY ODRISfPI1Cf1ON sHOL BEwR .07 ALL EROSION cDMTRa MEAawES sHDWN oN THE PLA S MUST BE NSTAUm PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT Of CONSTRUCTION OPEAAT06 MO MWRANED UNIX ALL AREAS ALTERED ON THE STE HIVE BEEN RESTORED. )) RPOPOSED Saw SEWER 07 NO �STRUC= MAY BECW ON THE 312 LPEIL NSTNUTION OF EMON CMARO- /ACIURES HAS SEER NSPECT D AEA APPROOED f f THE OTT. .D4 NO OD STRI7000N MAY BECNE ON THE SAE INTL THE CONTRACTOR WS COOROINTm A PERDONSTRWOON •� — — — — — PROPOSED SLY iOCE CONFERENCE WTD1 THE CRY. .03 ALL CONSnWfWM SIWEL BE N ACWI9WCE WIN TEE M OP EDNA AND THE NNE MBE OM WITEASHED DMiRICE STANDVAS AND SPECFXATW % TEAM SPECM70N S AND 10400T SPECS ATICNS. 0 PROPOSED W ENALK ML 13 EF NOIRE OE IT@1vH@ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LEGEND FOR EXISITNG ITEMS T� a AREA to" ISR-m 1 TOP OF CURR s CATCH MLN ---� —STORY SEW R 1 WE500R TILL FREE 1-!06-732 -11M T TOP OF WALL 0 STORM Y ,Cf E — , —sWOM1 SEWER v . 0 CE CEDAR 0 SAIRTART LLw,= — I — WATERYYM "I SP SPRUCE 0 i NvIT CA VEW D TR TREE (Cm GTE A VE M .—C WLL W1 WO1OW \ COMEEAOUS TREE 0 POWER Pd.E j �/1�, Q lKM PO,L —FORCE O vµp UGT FORCE MVN RECfMC 4W METAL MESH O Uolfn OEUOWUS TREC O ELECTIiC ER Na FZTER MW (Mh[DOT 3385) O OAS Y NRB COMPACTED 34CWU 1 .�fd[REf[ ate. SPOT L f CONTOUR o m+orts �eua i.� YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis YMCA Southdale Facility Expansion & Renovations City of Edina Submittal - 27 /,august 2 010 Existing Facility Photographs Building Illustrations Proposed Material Images Al BWBR Architects NJ q Vol .o a` Existing Facility Photographs � A P bi Existing Entry from Northwest - r Existing Entry from Southwest I1l4 YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I `-' %,40 ► SOUTHDALE BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 c� ��scv*7���., YMCA OF Mr-o rsvrvua nan FAC[tr' Y EXPANSION $ RIEWOYATIC' T EWER ARCHITECTS : .�> Existing YMCA from North Driveway 27 AUGUST 2010 Building Illustrations View from York Avenue YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS T - . - °H U u LE FAC[LfTV iE; , o ZION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Building Illustrations View from Northeast View from Northwest co A (1 YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I R'fcti SOU-17HOAt E FACILITY EXPANSION &- REFiOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Metal Panel & Glazing Proposed Material Images .�S :'` �J.o YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY F_XRA.HSfOI'•1 & RF— NCYATIONIS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 - Proposed Material Images Metal Panel I Metal Panel and Canopy AZ YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Iry W "� TI N f'``" ` . cl w. 40,706 SF Gross Floor Area (yellow and blue spaces) g 3 2 1 9 1. - 173 SF, stairs r 2. - 188 SF, stairs 3, - 501 SF, stairs 4. - 744 SF, stairs, ° ° ° mechanical, storage Vii' ` A a s! A rim c - �- 5. - 35 SF, toilet J r _ ........... .... .. ...... ....... {`4 ' 7Ce1 iH9 IfM ........... O 9' ---------------------------- 6. - 419 SF, stair, mechanical 7. - 185 SF, storage 8. - 614 SF, toilet 9. - 711SF, toilet, elevator, storage 8 7 37,136 SF Modified Gross Floor Area (yellow spaces) 6 4 N YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I ""rA���nnaAnt�� t —. _M� „- _. _„ ...,,� ,�,... `y „,�.,,p ., ,,.•„ BWBR Ground Plan ARCHITECTS September 2010 d3_n92 SF C.rn =-Q Flnnr Aran (YE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 21 (YI YMCA OF ' rROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOVTHDALE N Baser- -nt Plan BWBR ARCHITE =ptember 2010 AP%U toss INAAI.AA� — CIS ""=M AlYMA � T fM LMIFTWFTANONlO AN. CAM G 15COMP m CCLfG ANO LARW� IN-G— —.. ATIOW, rLtt,: RACY) III 1. —"it — W711 Vc,,AcT MOAT IWAI M NI 01 IIw MW IRA?" .—K—1 MNlWL —UNUEDSUM-1. MAT— El- M.TES.— ,---M.M� WilliT 1. A � K — U W ANY SIAt W G Ax¢1 AT I— TTS.`L m.t m"( W11M --n- -IM M 51W fG -MEM=, F•'T — TACTMMTRUNL -MMQ It rW .-D.MW PLANTING mwOLNOlOJW G 1 ATCHunft smTo " LANWAPE A4011 LCI POOR DMAKWA 1=3, ALL ANTS. NDSIDES OF MMG TO SO TW : sm FWSM tADL EE SPEC • SEE SPEC. SEE SPEC tToPLAN SPEC 11 UE SPLa LL SPECS. ULS -SLEPLM NUN), Imm SOIL • SEE SPECS. DOTS OF TERIAL PRIOR PIG rX P- --I IrTAUTIMIS '3-&FCWRKIIM 7UT-: 0 n M. V�O0 it ..do I Mid --I IrTAUTIMIS '3-&FCWRKIIM 7UT-: 0 --jTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING B W 11 fi� GOxleeer -W St. ft- S—, &W. 600 S.W, Pad. MN SRO -M 651.222N01 ASSOCIATES TdgVaOSWIW IIMI am or •R OtaGMERMN.OIIVV - wai ,•a Old NYnMA.wgtwRwtwgiW» Eq 10 MEMORANDUM - Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: September 24, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Southdale YMCA 7355 York Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and draft minutes. © A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. This should include all stop signs, one -way signs, HC parking signs, compact parking signs, etc. O A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works and MCES. O All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub- drainage area. Sheet — 200.CS: 1. Revise north entrance from the west parking field to York Avenue, see attached sketch. This revision was a request of the Transportation Commision and from my review of the parking lot circulation. The revision will improve the functionality of the entrance onto York Avenue, while encouraging more use of the south entrance onto York Avenue. 2. The parking lot revision also includes a sidewalk from York Avenue to the main entrance of the building. The sidewalk should also provide a bus pad at York Avenue for Metro Transit buses. 3. Remove parking along northerly side of site for access to the skate park entrance. 4. Provide landscape islands at parking lot tree ends in easterly parking field. 5. Provide dimensions for parking in the easterly parking field to match City Code 850.08, Subd 5, Al & A2. 6. Reverse the direction of circulation in the east parking field to be counterclockwise. This is the first re- review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks G:1Engineering \GeneraAY Streets\7355 York Ave - YMCMApproval Process\20100924 review o1 7355 York Avenue South.docx LP , •"" � �' '�•�y, Nff9 S4 5C1 E .77 11_�� , i�� ✓ e�� E( CURB goo � �1 1 � Q b„ �-•-�� - I Al Bo wrN�1r� MINUTES OF THE Ow e �� Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, August 19, 2010 v �y Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street •l�"°,� Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean White, Geof Workinger, Nathan Franzen STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called order by chair Janovy. II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of July 15, 2010 and the Work Session Minutes of July 1. 2010 Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the minutes of July 15 with the following corrections or changes by Commissioner Sprague: Page 2: Sprague moved that they create uniform#y and comprehensive approach for local streets with --a and therefore, enact a Complete Streets policy. Motion seconded by Nelson. Page 3: Road Diet/Re- Striping Policy "Sprague said Bloomington has..." Road Reconstruction The motion was modified that the ETC receives annual updates of road reconstruction and the Cl P. with a focus on the 2 -year plan but information on all proiects in the 5 -year plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sprague. All voted aye. III. New Business a. 7355 York Avenue (Southdale YMCA Expansion) Chuck Rickart of WSB & Associates, the City's consulting traffic engineer, explained the Southdale YMCA expansion project. Mr. Rickart said the project was originally submitted in September 2008 as replacement of the YMCA with similar square footage and a 130 -unit multi - family housing complex and approval was granted by the ETC with minor median reconstruction at York Avenue and the north parking lot entrance; however, the project was never constructed. The current proposal is to expand the existing facility approximately 21,900 sq.ft. with minimal parking lot and other site alterations. The expansion would be used for fitness and aquatics purposes and it could increase membership by 15 %. The multi - family component is no longer included. Rickart said the development team was asked to look intersections previously looked at including Parklawn & York, the two accesses in and out of the site and the oval median north of the site. The traffic study analysis shows that the expansion will add 1,162 additional trips per day with all intersections operating at an acceptable level of service D, except for an E or F on some movements, most of which are onsite in the parking lot. As part of the travel demand management, pedestrian travel will be improved with maintenance of the sidewalk along York A33 Avenue, and creation of a new pedestrian walk from York Avenue to the front door. Additionally, approximately 15 -20 bicycle racks will be added. Based on the study analysis, Rickart said improvements are not recommended for the local street network. Staff's recommendation is "If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Commissioners' discussion included the following, followed by consultant's and staff's response: • Reason for stopping the study at year 2012 instead of 2020 — Rickart said it is best to look at the impact year (2012), instead of background traffic. • Report does not say if parking meets code, — City engineer Houle said the Planning Commission (PC) reviews parking ratio. • South entrance is under - utilized, could almost be eliminated, explore options to increase usage — Houle said this entrance is only right -in /right -out while the other is both left and right. He said changes on York to accommodate changes to the access would require the County's approval and they tend to lean towards eliminating accesses. • Commissioner Bonneville said he likes the project but finds it difficult to approve a level of service E /F. Rickart said this is the current level without any crashes to date. Mr. Mike Spack, Spack Consulting, said they are defining average delay per car and if one car is coming out and has to wait one minute, this level of service is defined as F. • The island at the south entrance (on site) seems close for traffic coming into the park lot. Rickart said most parking lots are designed for drivers to go left or right upon entry, not straight ahead. • Can the travel demand management plan be improved on the site? Commissioner Schroeder said the PC can take a closer look at this. Spack said office buildings tend to have more control over employees; with the YMCA the controls will be more difficult. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the YMCA offer incentives that would spread usage throughout the day. • What would trigger a future traffic signal at Parklawn? Rickart said about 10 -20% increase in traffic which could be 5 -10 years out. After discussion the overall concerns were summarized as: • Improving the travel management demand plan (since the YMCA is heavily used by children and seniors); • Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; • Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and • Fire truck and ambulance access; Commissioner Bonneville asked if emergency vehicles will be able to move around the building. Houle said site circulation is the PC's purview and they receive comments from the Fire Marshall and the Building Department official. He reminded the ETC that their purview is the roadway and local transportation while site circulation, access, and safety are handled by the PC. Chair Janovy said they are finding it difficult to separate what is happening on site with the roadway because they work together. Commissioner Bonneville said there are some things that happen at entrances that affect the roadway severely so they should have the right to review those things because of the site itself and the function of the site. Houle said the Traffic 2 X,y- Impact Analysis would need to be changed and the ETC would be more meshed with the PC to prevent duplication. Chair Janovy said in their last work session they made a motion to refer the TIA policy for update to staff and to have Assistant City Engineer Sullivan work with staff in the Planning Department, a couple ETC and PC commissioners to try and integrate the Transportation and Planning process better. Commissioner Bonneville motioned that the minutes shall act as the ETC's opinion as to the project's future and that the YMCA and Spack Consulting look into their concerns as stated in the minutes. Motion failed for lack of second. Commissioner Sprague motioned to accept the Traffic Impact Analysis that was presented and to include their three concerns that were raised as follows: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; and 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane. Commissioner Schroeder asked to amend the motion to read that it is their opinion that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems and request that their three concerns listed above be addressed. Commissioner Sprague accepted the amendment. After further discussion, the motion was restated by Commissioner Sprague that the expansion does not adverselv affect the adjacent transportation systems: however, the following recommendations are made: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Improve pedestrian safety in the parking lot; 3) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage: 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and 4) Improving the level of service at the northbound exit. Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. All voted aye. Motion carried. b. Edina Police Presentation Sergeant Tom Draper, a night supervisor with the Edina Police Department, explained the operations of the Traffic Unit. He said the unit with three officers, covers traffic enforcement from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He said staffing is comparable to other cities of similar size. Sgt. Draper said they are required to spend a certain amount of time at locations that are called in by residents. There is a speed trailer that is moved around to different locations. He said residents begin calling around March /April to get on the list. Regarding stop signs, he said the requests are referred to the Engineering Department. He said enforcement is increased in problem areas for stop sign violations, as well as no turn on red. Regarding bicycles, he said is not aware that citations have been issued instead they are warning riders that they are required to follow the same laws as motor vehicles. He was asked about joggers in the road when there is a sidewalk — he said he is not aware of citations being issued. He said they do target speeders in neighborhoods and have found that most violators do live in the neighborhood, on 70th Street, for example, most of the violators are residents. He said officers do have discretion when to write a citation; however, most drivers have come to expect a 5 mph leeway. A moving violation citation is $150 and this is set by Hennepin County. He said public education would be helpful since most of the violators are in the neighborhoods. Commissioner Janovy said the primary focus has been engineering solutions to traffic issues. She said other communities are using different approaches such as training residents to use 3 4 s- radar gun and writing down license plate number and sending a polite letter from the police department. Sgt. Draper said this has been discussed which is why the radar is out there. Houle talked a project called Project Lead Foot which he said is very much like the City's program but just not captured in the same way. He said traffic safety coordinator, Boyd, does go out and use a radar gun. with residents and they are usually surprised to discover that the speed is not as fast as they thought it was. Commissioner Sprague said Chanhassen has found that raising awareness is the most useful through a traffic worksheet that they distribute to residents. Houle said many neighborhoods have their own listserve and this would be an inexpensive way to communicate. Traffic Safety Reports of June 2 and July 7 Chair Janovy said they agreed that the Traffic Safety Report would be put on their consent agenda. July 7 report — Section D — regarding the calls received from residents regarding France Avenue Restriping. Houle said most calls are due to the restriping which causes drivers to slow down. Houle explained that Section D of the report is new and is to show the types of calls that are received and that the issues are generally resolved without having to go to the Traffic Safety Committee. IV. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) No update. V. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) No update. VI. Staff Liaison Comments a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update Houle approvals were received from Mn /DOT, bids are set to be opened on September 9 and construction spring 2011. Regarding landscaping in the boulevard, Houle said they will coordinate with residents to move and transplant plantings within a specific timeframe at the residents' expense. He said irrigation /dog fence is included in the construction costs. Houle shared materials from a personal rapid transit workshop that he attended. He said the presenter is willing to attend a meeting to explain how it works. VII. Commission Comments No comments. VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. 4 gati Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item III. B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING RE PO RT/RECOM M E N DATI O N To: Transportation Commissioners From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: August 19, 2010 Subject: Transportation Impact Analysis — 7355 York Avenue: Southdale YMCA Expansion Recommendation: Agenda Item No.: III. B. ACTION: Recommendation /Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting on August 9, 2010, review memo dated August 2, 2010 from WSB and Associates and the following staff report. Staff and WSB have reviewed the Transportation Impact Analysis from Spack Consulting for the Southdale YMCA Expansion dated August 9, 2010 and believe the development team has met our requirements. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect to the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: The Southdale YMCA submitted a proposal in September 2008 to demolish the 70,000 sq. ft. YMCA building and rebuild a 72,000 sq. ft. YMCA along with 130 unit of Multi- family housing. The transportation analysis was approved by the ETC with the condition that the median nose on York Avenue, at the north entrance, be modified to match the proposed reconfiguration of the parking lot. The parking lot had a 150 foot exclusive right turn lane and a shared left/thru to accommodate the on -site delays. However, the proposed redevelopment as outlined in September 2008 was never constructed. The current application is to expand the existing YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 sq. ft. without the addition of a housing component. Aa j G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819_7355_York_YMCA.docx Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item III. B. With the revised site redevelopment the City required the development team to update the 2008 transportation impact analysis (TIA) with the most current existing traffic and projected traffic impacts. The TIA's objectives were to: 1.. analyze the existing and proposed traffic operations of the following intersections: - York Avenue at Parklawn - York Avenue and the north and south YMCA entrances - York Avenue at the "oval about" north of the YMCA facility 2. Recommend improvement to the local street network, if needed. An initial TIA was submitted to the City and WSB for review in Mid -July. From that report a memo with 12 outstanding issues was created (dated August 2, 2010, not included in your packet) and sent back to Spack Consulting. The follow up TIA dated August 9, 2010 from Spack Consulting addresses all the questions and comments as outlined in the WSB memo. The Southdale YMCA's Transportation Impact Analysis shows that all study intersections will continue to operate at LOS D or better during all study periods once the facility is fully operational (2012). They have addressed travel demand management and pedestrian concerns to our satisfaction. In addition, no improvements are required of the local street network. The median nose at York Avenue and the north YMCA entrance can remain as is. kA G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Trafric \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819 7355_York_YMCAdocx A WSB. Infrastructure a Engineering o Planning o Construction & Assmiares, Mr. Memorandum To: Mayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Tack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: August 2, 2010 Re: Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fa= 763 5414700 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study dated July 12th, 2010 prepared by Spack Consulting for the proposed Southdale YMCA Expansion located on the east side of York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue A previous redevelopment project was proposed for the YMCA site in 2008. The original project included a new YMCA building with Multi- Family on the site. The previous plan, although was approved, is now proposed to be modified. The current proposed project involves the expansion of the existing 67,700 SF YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 SF. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared and reviewed as part of the propose&project in 2008. That study has been updated with the new development proposal. Based on our review of the updated Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study, the following questions and comments. are made. 1. The original Traffic Impact Study indicated that the existing YMCA was 70,000 SF. The new Traffic Impact Study indicates the existing YMCA is 67,700 SF. This needs to be clarified. 2. The Land Use discussion on page 3 indicates that the total square footage with the expansion will be 91,900. Table 2.1 indicates that the total square footage will be 89.620. This needs to be clarified. 3. On page 4 the development phasing and timing indicates that the project will be fully operational by the "END" of 2012. The analysis looked at 2012 as the full build out of the site with background traffic. What would be the impact of another year of background traffic on the study intersections? This would provide a more realistic indication of full build out impacts. �� C.%WS3 &-%(DA0a boue-090210YMCA -ao- Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 2 of 3 4. Figure 2.2 shows the proposed concept plan. A more detailed figure should be provided showing the existing medians on York Avenue in association with the site driveways. 5. The existing analysis indicates that the north YMCA access experiences longer delays during the PM peak hour. How does this impactthe existing site circulation? 6. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event..i How does the parking-compare with what is required by Zoning? 7. Figure 3.4 does not show existing "Stop Signs" for the YMCA access driveways. It is implied in the text that they are there. If not they should be added with this project. 8. Figure 3.8 shows existing Average Daily Traffic volumes from 2005.2009 volumes are now available. This fgure should: be updated. The other figures (4.13) and analysis associated with the ADT volumes should also be updated. 9. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the North Site entrance will have some movements at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. c The overall Level of Service at the North Site entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement, at LOS F. If another year of background traffic were to be assumed how, would the North Site entrance intersection be impacted? ® The queuing analysis indicates that there may be "significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the AM and PM peak hours ". How does this significant queue get handled on the site? o The queuing analysis in the previous study and for the AM'condition shows 150 foot storage for the westbound through, left and right at the North Site access intersection. The PM peak shows a 600 foot available storage. This appears to be a typo. If that is the case the PM peak queue will be in excess of the available storage. This should be mitigated. 10. No mitigation is recommended with the proposed expansion. The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis from the previous study recommended adding a right turn lane on York Avenue and a westbound right turn lane at the North Site entrance. The queue analysis does not show a significant improvement from the original study to the current study. Why are these improvements not being recommended now? 01 CAWSBTBdineVAEMO -xfio , -080210 YMCAdon a c k - RAFFIC SIUDf COJk,PANY t� �q 1 v' �• Patklawn Avc Traffic Impact Stud Southdale YMCA Expansion Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of M- iin✓n�esota. By: /���Rf -- Michal P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: August 9. 2010 1k3a Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 3 of 3 11. The study discusses the use and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It should be expanded to include, how people at the YMCA can get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided / available? 12. A general discussion on pedestrian / bike accommodations should be provided. A figure similar to that provided with the previous study should be included showing existing and planned sidewalk and bike facilities. Will YMCA have bike racks or other amenities for pedestrians? If so, where are they in relationship to the sidewalk and trail facilities? Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the traffic impact study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. CkWSB\FA-VAE (3-.i,.t.0802ioYMCAao. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary .......................... ..............................1 2. Proposed Development and Study Area ... ............................... 3 3. Existing Traffic Conditions ......................... ............................... 7 Figure 3.5 - Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................12 4. Projected Traffic .......................................... .............................16 Figure 3.7 - Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic ............. .............................14 Figure 3.8 - Existing Daily Traffic ...:................................... .............................15 6. Traffic and Improvement Analysis ........... ............................... 32 S. Conclusions and Recommendations ...... ............................... 36 7. Appendix ...................................................... .............................37 Figure 4.5 - Daily Volumes Due to Development .............. .............................23 LIST OF FIGURES Figure2.1 - Location Map .................................................... ..............................5 Figure 2.2 - Concept Plan .................................................... ..............................6 Figure 3.1 - Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking .. ..............................9 Figure 3.2 - Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking ... ..............................9 Figure 3.3 - Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking ........ .............................10 Figure 3.4 - Existing Conditions ........................................ .............................11 Figure 3.5 - Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................12 Figure 3.6 - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................13 Figure 3.7 - Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic ............. .............................14 Figure 3.8 - Existing Daily Traffic ...:................................... .............................15 Figure 4.1 - Trip Distribution .............................................. .............................19 Figure 4.2 - A.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development .........................20 Figure 4.3 - P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..........................21 Figure 4.4 - Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..................22 Figure 4.5 - Daily Volumes Due to Development .............. .............................23 Figure 4.6 - 2012 No -Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................24 Figure 4.7 - 2012 No -Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................25 Figure 4.8 - 2012 No -Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ............................26 Figure 4.9 - 2012 No -Build Daily Volumes ......................... .............................27 Figure 4.10 - 2012 Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................28 Figure 4.11 - 2012 Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................29 Figure 4.12 - 2012 Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ... .............................30 Figure 4.13 - 2012 Build Daily Volumes ............................. .............................31 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 - Before /After Square Footage of Uses .............. ..............................4 Table 3.1 - Existing Level of Service ( LOS) ........................ ..............................8 Table 4.1 -Trip Generation .................................................. .............................18 Table 5.1 - 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .......................32 Table 5.2 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service ( LOS) .....................:.......32 Table 5.3 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results ......... ...........:.................34 Southdale YMCA Expansion i� Traffic Impact Study 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. They are proposing to build an approximately 21,900 addition onto the approximately 67,700 square foot YMCA. The purpose of this report is to determine if completion of this addition will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system. The study objectives are: L Determine how the existing York Avenue South intersections at Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road currently operate. ii. Determine if the existing Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road will operate with acceptable vehicle delays and stacking after the addition is fully occupied in 2012. iii. Recommend improvements if needed. A traffic study was prepared in 2008 for a proposed redevelopment, which included housing. The current proposal eliminates housing and is limited to expanding the existing YMCA. Based on discussions with City of Edina staff, this traffic study updates the report from 2008 to account for the proposed expansion project. b. Executive Summary The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. The facility currently has approximately 67,700 square feet and the addition is proposed to add approximately 21,900 square feet. The site is located in Edina, MN on York Avenue South between Parklawn Avenue and the traffic circle south of Hazelton Road. Access to the site will be from two existing intersections on York Avenue South. The north intersection is a full intersection and the south intersection is a right in /right out intersection. City staff has requested a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic impacts of the redevelopment on the adjacent roadways for 2012 (when it is assumed full occupancy will occur). The intersections studied are: Southdale YMCA Expansion I N J Traffic Impact Study York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue e York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance York Avenue ' South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance e York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road The principal findings of this study are: i. The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance., and,the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour; p.m. peak .hour, and Saturday: midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better,during the study periods: in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. ii. The maximum queues" , at the study intersections are anticipated to be contained within the existing lanes through the 2012 Build scenario. iii. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in. the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. iv. Based on the ' parking . analysis completed for the redevelopment, it is anticipated that providing 297 total parking spaces for the site will be adequate. To adequately mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development, the following improvement plan is recommended: i. Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. ii. Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: ® The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. Southdale YMCA Expansion 2 Traffic Impact Study The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 2. Proposed Development and Study Area a. Site Location The proposed development site is located on York Avenue South north of Parklawn Avenue and south of the traffic circle located south of Hazelton Road in Edina, MN. The existing site driveways are planned to remain unaltered with the expansion project. See Figure 2.1 for a location map. It shows the location of the study intersections, which are: • York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue • York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & traffic circle north of the Hazelton Road b. Land Use and Intensity the 4 intersections comprising the YMCA north entrance and south of The existing YMCA is approximately 67,700 square feet. Note the 2008 Traffic Study listed the existing YMCA as 70,000 square feet, but that figure did not account for stairwells, mechanical rooms, etc. per Edina City Code. The proposed addition will add approximately 21,900 square feet, bringing the total square footage to approximately 89,620 square feet. The site will provide 297 parking stalls after the expansion project is complete (a reduction of 40 stalls from the existing 337). Table 2.1 shows the uses in the existing facility as well as the uses planned to be in the facility after the remodeling /addition project are complete (along with their associated square footages). 63 Southdale YMCA Expansion 3 Traffic Impact Study Table 2.1 — Before /After Square Footage of Uses YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Deveiopment Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. �S? Southdale YMCA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study Square Footage Square Footage Use Before Expansion After Expansion Fitness Spaces (cardio, weights, studios, racquetball 20,570 33,450 together, walking track Locker Rooms 11,140 10,560 Aquatics (pools and Jacuzzi) 6,800 10,500 Drop -in Childcare 5,255 5,510 Staff (offices, conference) 2,010 2,360 Total Area (including hallways, mechanical 67,720 89,620 spaces, etc. YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Deveiopment Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. �S? Southdale YMCA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study Sp.----ac f t�m Ig Af,r. � � � 1 , 1, , = Study Inter'scactions MIPI-d W"dbiV Southdale YMCA Expansion 5 Traffic Impact Study Fiqure 2.1 Location Maps YMCA Redevelopment u� 'm Noh North Edina, MN 12A h AW ft No Scale DO E ail g G,... 4 �-� M . - 19 Eg IN ail - = Study Inter'scactions MIPI-d W"dbiV Southdale YMCA Expansion 5 Traffic Impact Study Spack ��Nf. 'fF C `. .. C•.l -hA'` FIgul =e ®2 Concept Plan YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN I II Driveway L7 — Remains Unaltered 1-40 • i e New Sidewalk ri Planned from York Avenue to Front Door IIJR�IIJIIILL � Driveway Remains Unaltered I5 to2Q Bike [hacks Planned Near Front Floor ' i j W& + North No Scale � r I' Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects, Southdale YKACA Expansion 6 Traffic Impact Study g � , -:,;� � � � I � � � i \ '-_ -,+ {. �.. ti -yam; � • 1� 7� 1 1� Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects, Southdale YKACA Expansion 6 Traffic Impact Study I Existing Traffic Conditions a. Physical Characteristics Access to the site will be provided by two existing intersections on York Avenue South. York Avenue South is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31 and is designated as a Major Collector by Hennepin County. Parklawn Avenue is a City street and is designated as a collector by the City of Edina. Existing traffic control, speed limits, and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.4 for each study intersection. Figure 3.4 shows the stop signs that physically exist, although all driveways are legally stop condition. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of York Avenue near the site. No roadway improvements are scheduled near the site. b. Traffic Volumes The weekday a.m., weekday p.m. and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted in 2008 at the study intersections (see Figures 3.5, 3.6 & 3.7). The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods align with typical rush hours. The YMCA classes have the heaviest attendance during the morning on Saturdays. Since the traffic patterns in the area are most impacted by the shopping district, it is believed the late a.m. period on Saturday has the heaviest combination of site traffic and background traffic. The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The daily traffic volumes for the area roadways are shown on Figure 3.8. c. Level of Service C LOS D = Acceotabie LOS F = Unaccegs able Source: City of San Jose, CA An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is considered acceptable in urban conditions. Individual movements are also assigned LOS grades. One or more individual movements typically operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled Ao Southdale YMCA Expansion 7 Traffic Impact Study intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual movements. The LOS results for the 2008 study hours are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4 (all driveway exits are treated as having stop control, which they are legally, even if a stop sign isn't present). The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.5 through 3.7 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The SYNCHROTM model was created for this project since the study intersections are not part of the city's existing model. The intersections will be added to the city's model if the project is approved and constructed. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 3.1 — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/C B/F A/ D York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / B A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A/C A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A / B A/C A / C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections operate acceptably at LOS B or better in the existing a.m. weekday, p.m. weekday and Saturday midday peak hours. As often happens along busy corridors such as York Avenue, some individual side street movements experience longer delays while the overall intersection operates acceptably with little overall delay. The eastbound and westbound approaches at the York Ave /North YMCA Entrance currently experience LOS F in the weekday p.m. peak hour. The eastbound approach currently experiences LOS F at the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue intersection in the weekday p.m. peak hour while the westbound approach experiences LOS E. d. Parking Volumes Parking capacity was determined to be 337 stalls combining spaces on both the west and east sides of the existing facility. Data on the actual number of cars parked was collected immediately prior to all three data collection timeframes. This beginning number was then adjusted based on the turning movement counts completed at the Southdale YMCA Expansion 8 Traffic Impact Study site's driveways to provide a total number of cars in the lots in fifteen minute.. increments. Following. in Figures 3.1 through 3.3 are the results of this data collection. Additional details are contained in the appendix. Figure 3.1 - Existing Weekday AEI Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 N g 250 o� 200 150 a 100 50 0 —Occupied —Capacity_ Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 N fg 250 N 200 150 a 100 50 0 �• I r oil a a. M a a a a LO M p Ln O Ln O lA O LO O M tt O r M ti ti 00.' 00 00 00 CD CA On —Occupied —Capacity_ Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 N fg 250 N 200 150 a 100 50 0 �• I r oil kk;- —Occupied ® Capacity Southdale YMCA Expansion 9 Traffic Impact Study a a. M a a a a o. a M O li, O Ln O � ate- M V' O ' e- M 4 L 6 ui iii 6 (O t0 kk;- —Occupied ® Capacity Southdale YMCA Expansion 9 Traffic Impact Study Figure 3.3 — Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking 400-. 350 U) 300 f9 250 a 200 — Occupied Capacity 150 a 100 50 0 2 2 2 2 2 Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a a a M � O r M � O r M O O The maximum number of occupied spaces during the study periods was 177 spaces. Average occupancy, based on the available 337 parking spaces, was 40% of capacity. Following are the high and low occupancy rates for each time period: • Thursday a.m. -high 53% and low 31% • Thursday p.m. — high 42% and low 29% • Saturday — high 47% and low 27% e. Data Sources The sources for the data sited above are: • Turning movement counts — Traffic Data Inc. • Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting • Concept plan — BWBR Architects • Daily traffic volumes — Mn /DOT traffic flow maps A0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 10 Traffic Impact Study ackSUDY COMPA�'Y xisting Lanes & T YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN on 4 Traffic Circle NW Z, Traffic Circle SW *'14 V Apartment North Driveway M Bus Stop (Routes 539, 539, 578) Apartment South Driveway ■ 30 mph t CL E LO M Circle NE Traffic Circle SE (enter only) Pedestrian Underpass *�L YMCA North Driveway $11 f Q Bus Stop (Routes 538, 539, 578) EENWYMCA South Driveway 4"11 1 1+ r 0 N d 7 C a Y 0 O } 11 Southdale YMCA Expansion 11 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale Op C �TRA�FiC STLIDY COMPANY Figure 3.5 Existing AM. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment I h Edina, MN No Scale o to 36 n 4®6 4� 24 A r 29 23 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE m n n .- uI N V 54 33� 16 N n 22 Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE V) 63 ,p *'1=3 20 J , `� 4m= 0 55 o utOi p �Y 12 - � 1 Q �p 9 0E=* v W V) o 7 " 4-1 Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway n �a8 Apartment South Driveway 4J e � i 4�1 4r 6 YMCA South Driveway 474 0 ®p V) .0 24 cl M Parklawn Avenue L 7 O N m 7 C d O } O-S- Southdale YMCA Expansion, 12 Traffic Impact Study a k iF1E TRAFFIC 57L'V :y COMPANY Existing PM Peak Hour YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue !/plumes O N m 7 C d Y O Figure 306 North No Scale . Southdale YMCA Expansion 13 Traffic Impact Study ac S PHHE TRArriC 5TU0Y COMPANY Existing Saturday F YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 307 At Forth No Scale Southdale YMCA Expansion 14 h�� Traffic Impact Study S ack P'HE TRArfIC 57UDY COMPANY Existing Daily Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN He Circle NE Me Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway T LEGEND 2009 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes source: Mn/DOT Traffic Flow Maps Southdale YMCA Expansion 15 k4i Traffic Impact Study North No Scale 4. Projected Traffic The- assumptions described in this section were reviewed by City of Edina engineering staff before the forecasts in this section were developed. a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed YMCA expansion based on the methods and. rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The Weekday a.m. peak hour trip generation is for the "one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 7 -9 a.m. The Weekday .p.m. peak hour trip generation is for the "ona hour of adjacent street traffic" from 4 -6 p.m. The Saturday peak hour trip generation. is for the "peak hour of generator". In addition ' a 15% growth factor was applied to the existing entering and exiting peak hour volumes. This represents the possible maximum growth in membership. The `resultant trip generations _are shown in Table 4.1. No trip reductions for pass -by or .diverted trips were made. It is assumed all of the trips for the site will be newly generated. Also, there is bus service available near the site on York Avenue but no trip reductions were taken for transit use. These assumptions result in a more conservative analysis. The directional orientation of the generated traffic is shown in Figure 4.1. This orientation is based on a weighted distribution of the traffic volumes currently using York Avenue South, ;:TK'e daily traffic volume on each road segment was divided by the sum of the daily traffic volumes on the road segments to develop the directional orientation. The a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, Saturday peak hour and daily trips generated by the site were assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5. These traffic volumes will be added to the existing traffic volumes to develop the build -out conditions. b. Non -site Traffic Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 scenario by applying a 0.92% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 year growth factor of 1.2 the Mn /DOT State Aid office assigned to Hennepin County in 2008. The 2012 No -Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. V\ Southdale YMCA Expansion 16 Traffic Impact Study c. Total Traffic for 2092 .. Traffic forecasts were developed for the; .year 2012: Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development, as shown in Figures 4.21hrough 4.5, to the ..No -Build volumes shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. The resultant 2012 Build traffic forecasts are shown in„ Figures 4.10 through 4.13. Southdale.YMCA Expansion 17 kso Traffic Impact Study pa' c---k iAAFFIC �HJUY CIMPAIAY Table 4a1 __ _ Forecast Trip Generation YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Daily Volumes LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS (GFA) QUANTITY DAILY RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 330 330 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 22.88 50% 50% 0% 0 0% 0 251 251 TOTALS 1 1 0 0 581 581 AM Peals Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY AM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 29 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.62 61% 39% 0% 0 0% 0 22 14 TOTALS 1 0 0 51 35 PM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY PM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 26 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.45 37% 63% 0% 0 0% 0 12 20 TOTALS 1 0 0 38 41 Saturday Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY SAT RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 14 22 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.07 54% 46% 0% 0 0% 0 13 11 TOTALS 1 0 0 27 33 NOTES: 1. GFA = Gross Floor Area 2. YMCA Expansion Daily = 2.75 x normal ITE rate for existing 67.7 KSF x 15% growth 3. YMCA Expansion Peak Hours = 15% growth x existing entering and exiting volumes 4. All other trip generation rates based on "Trip Generation ", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition unless otherwise noted. 5. All other A.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7:00 & 9:00 a.m.). 6. All other P.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4:00 & 6:00 p.m.). 7. All other Saturday Midday Trip Generation is for the peak hour of generator B. No Saturday peak hour trip generation is available for ITE Code 253 - assume Saturday is the same as pm peak hour. Southdale YMCA Expansion 18 Traffic Impact Study Spack Figure 4.1 Trip Distribution YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale 7nth Ct Southdale YMCA Expansion 19 `�1 Traffic Impact Study Sack pTRAFFIC S1UDY COMPAN1 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN O n 4�0 «� 1 Im 0 o� Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE O M O 1 Figure 4.2 North No Scale Lo 4�o «1f�' °N °i 0 j 1 r► 0 0 -► N O 0'� Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE Leo Lo ooC* 4�0 0$ 414 �20 4l 01 '1 1 r► 1 it 0M o0o ON o� o� Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway Lo O N O 4� o Apartment South Driveway 4J 14 r. o MCA South Driveway i o J C2 CD 0 + o N/ r c 7 O d 7 C m a Y L O h53 Southdale YMCA Expansion 20 Traffic Impact Study S Pac �ffiknkAFFIC St UDv COMPANI PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN O N � 0 4 ! j. 0 0 Traffic Circle NW O 0 Tffc Circle SW o � \ Apartment South Driveway r_ r- 7 O U) m 7 C N O } Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Figure 4.3 North No Scale Lo ♦� 0 ti 1 r► 01 tr o �.► N o Lo O N 4! tr 0 i o/ L 20 O O N �, l 4 � o r 20 01 '1 t r ♦1 t p 0� O o 0 o� Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway r_ r- 7 O U) m 7 C N O } Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Figure 4.3 North No Scale Lo ♦� 0 ti 1 r► 01 tr o �.► N o Lo O N 4! tr 0 i o/ rzL Southdale YMCA Expansion 21 Traffic Impact Study L o 'N O N O 4 . O to o South Driveway o J ♦1 t p 0 0 + coo N/ rzL Southdale YMCA Expansion 21 Traffic Impact Study bN,N a ck r®f „ 1' �I �I �°e �o� lml.-�ETdA(I`IC S1'UD1 COMPANY ,Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment I MN No Edlna, No Scale C+ 0 f�+0 0 0 0 N Traffic Circle NW )ffii�W JIM Traffic Circle NE o O 0 r \ Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE / to 20 O o N i� � 0 �+10 0� 4-j TO 0�, o00 o� Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway w O n1 m C O O } YMCA North / o A.0 \ O P 4l t� 00 , +T Southdale YMCA Expansion 22 Traffic Impact Study L0 ono � 0 \ fa 0 MCA South Driveway !� 0� ®� 0E3i* 000 0 q +T Southdale YMCA Expansion 22 Traffic Impact Study S ac-k PTHE iRAUIC SiuDY COMFANt Daily Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN fic Circle NE ffic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway Fi Southdale YMCA Expansion 23 Traffic Impact Study ure 4.5 North No Scale S-ack s t� THE TRAFFIC 5 %'Vy COMPANY 2012 AM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway r_ r= 7 O N d 7 C d Q Y O ,Sl Figure 4.6 Southdale YMCA Expansion 24 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale a_ C THE TRAFFIC $TEIpY COMPANY Figure 4.7 2012 PM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale d 14; 20 a-• �o 411 30 20 mi � o o � o 30 nmy \0 0 L 80 � ° co m° 41.0 1 IJ� 1-40 1101 *11 r' 0y 00 0 °E gym/ Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue E. O rn d c Q Y O �_i I Traffic Circle NE � r 0 0 0 T co 70.t IN* 30 mm► m o M Traffic Circle SE C3 C+I"L,20 YMCA North Drivewav 0 L 1\ «fib 4--o r10 South Driveway 100+ ♦ *1 l it 0M—► 90 -1 0 0 0 j Southdale YMCA Expansion 25 Traffic Impact Study .c :a .HE fP,nr(IC..TUDY COMP4 *Y �0'! 2 �aturda}� Pea YMCA Redeveloprrrlent Edina, MN 0 N � � 10 p 40 30 0 n m fp-� 4J I 20 oz* 20 cat 0 IL 100 �1t 50 10- 1 01=010, 0 0 0 10.% W2 Traffic Circle SW it North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn P_ o. m c m Q 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Ii® Traffic Circle SE ® YMCA North 80 J � 19* 10 � N 0 IL 0 IL 10 r 4� 0 �J1� X10 South Driveway b 70� tg* V7 CD 208 j v ff_� Traffic Impact Study Figure 4 4.8 Hour No- Build Traffic Volume North No Scale 120 d� 20 0 0 0 r) W 0 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE MN 0 N � � 10 p 40 30 0 n m fp-� 4J I 20 oz* 20 cat 0 IL 100 �1t 50 10- 1 01=010, 0 0 0 10.% W2 Traffic Circle SW it North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn P_ o. m c m Q 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Ii® Traffic Circle SE ® YMCA North 80 J � 19* 10 � N 0 IL 0 IL 10 r 4� 0 �J1� X10 South Driveway b 70� tg* V7 CD 208 j v ff_� Traffic Impact Study Traffic Circle SW it North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn P_ o. m c m Q 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Ii® Traffic Circle SE ® YMCA North 80 J � 19* 10 � N 0 IL 0 IL 10 r 4� 0 �J1� X10 South Driveway b 70� tg* V7 CD 208 j v ff_� Traffic Impact Study 0 IL 10 r 4� 0 �J1� X10 South Driveway b 70� tg* V7 CD 208 j v ff_� Traffic Impact Study ff_� Traffic Impact Study P MDY COPAwv 012 wily ® ®804 Traffic V®Iu es YMCA-Redevelopment Edina, IAN Southdale YMCA Expansion 27 fic Circle NE ffic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway A p FWure 4 ®9 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale 'f 11 a c r"If al1P,AIFIC S1UDY COMPANY Figure 401.0 2012 AM. Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN . Plorth No Scale a0 : .°-'. 70 30 4=-=i 30 'u 20 ol 0,6 C3 ` a Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE 0 p C, b Q 60 _ 40 20 a 2u Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE 0 IL 90 o L 20 . 4—o oCO a-� 10 6 _ 0 20� N ti P 1+! 0� C) O Apartment North Driveway YMCA North: Driveway o IL 10 Apartment South Driveway 100 N O 4J 4-0 49010 MCA South Driveway So 411 f g* 0= OV C3, Oe 20 �* Parklawn Avenue 0 0 m' 0 c d, Q 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 28 Traffic Impact Study Spack I Wango Tf,E TRAffIC STUDY COMP/,N1 Fi ure 4.11 2012 PM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale h Aa Southdale YMCA Expansion 29 Traffic Impact Study SD-ac E� =`��`� Fi ure 4.12 THE TRAFFIC fTUOY COMFANl 2012 Saturday Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale 0 n ie 10 4J 40 30 o o b o N ID n 20 mwmf� \0 Z Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW 0 L 120 �N °w ♦�0 6 10 J ♦0 ♦1 1 lip qC21 Oy 10 Sao Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway 7 O N m 7 C d Q Y O } Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North L20� wm 20 4-1 j* 000 C,m�, W so.± 19* 10 ME* V cm 'D // 0/ qC21 MCA South Driveway 41 t i* 70 + 30 Traffic Impact Study CD L10 t 4 i 4••. o �10 MCA South Driveway 41 t i* 70 + 20~ b 30 Traffic Impact Study s THE TRAFFIC 57UDY COMPANY 2012 Daily Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN fic Circle NE ffic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway 4�k Fi ure 4.13 Southdale YMCA Expansion 31 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2012 Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2012 study hours are shown in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4. It is assumed all of the lane configurations and traffic control are the same between the No -Build and Build scenarios. Table 5.1 No Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.6, 4.7 & 4.8. Table 5.2 Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D B/F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / A A / B A/13 York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / D A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A/13 A / C A/13 York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. Table 5.2 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D C/ F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A/13 A / B A/13 York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / E D / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections will operate acceptably at LOS D or better in all of the study scenarios. Based on level of service analyses, there may be vehicle stacking issues at the North YMCA entrance and on Parklawn Avenue. Vehicle stacking at these two intersections is addressed in the next section. Southdale YMCA Expansion 32 Traffic Impact Study Figures 4.9 and 4.1.3 show, the 2012 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in the No- Build and Build scenarios. Based on calculations .from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manua /,. a" four lane divided roadway such as York Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28;000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. A four lane undivided roadway such as Parklawn Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximate, y 15,000- to, 20,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for LOS Don York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in both -the 2012 No- Build and Build scenarios. b. Queuing Analysts Based on the,;. _Level of Service analyses above, the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York-Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections' may have significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York 'Avenue in the a.m. and.p.m. peak hours. To determine the length of the. queues in the 2012 Build scenario, a more detailed traffic analysis was .performed with a SimTrafficTM micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.4 were used with the p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10 and 4.11. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were transferred from SYNCHROT to SimTrafficTM The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 3 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 3 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. Table 5.3 shows a summary of the stacking results for the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections in the 2.012 Build a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Southdale YMCNExpansion 33 Traffic Impact Study Table 5.3 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results motes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffic m for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 Traffic Impact Study York Ave /Parklawn Ave York Ave /North YMCA A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Left 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Thru 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft M (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) w Right 30 ft 170 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Left 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) 050 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Thru 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Right 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Left 50 ft 50 ft 40 ft 40 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) -0 Thru Oft Oft Oft Oft V 0 (900 ft) (900 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) Z Right Oft Oft Oft Oft (250 ft) (250 ft (650 ft) (650 ft) Left O ft 30 ft 60 ft 60 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Thru (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) 0 (0 Right 20 ft 20 ft O ft O ft (225 ft) (225 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) motes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffic m for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 Traffic Impact Study The Mn /DOT crash database was reviewed (with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool). From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008 there was one crash at the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection. It occurred on June 13, 2007 and was a rear end crash between two northbound vehicles. There is not a significant crash problem at the intersection that will be exacerbated by the expansion project. c. Traffic Control Needs Traffic signals or roundabouts should be installed at intersections when justified per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. None of the traffic volume warrants in the Manual will be met in the 2012 Build condition. In order to meet the Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3), the minor street would need to have 150 left turn volumes on one approach. None of the study intersections will meet this threshold. The westbound approach at the northern YMCA access will have 80 vehicles in the a.m. peak hour with little traffic growth after the redevelopment happens. The eastbound Parklawn Avenue approach to York Avenue will have 100 vehicles in the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour. If traffic grows in the study area, the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue may be a long term candidate to be controlled by a traffic signal or a roundabout. No new traffic control devices are required for the YMCA site redevelopment. The existing stop sign control for traffic leaving the site should be maintained with the redevelopment. d. Parking Analysis The maximum number of occupied parking spaces was 177 during the study period. The facility will be expanded by approximately 32% with the proposed addition. Increasing the peak parking demand by 32 %, results in the need for 234 parking stalls. Increasing the 234 stalls by 15% to account for additional membership growth, results in a maximum expected parking need of 269 stalls. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the peak parking demand. e. Transit Facilities There is a bus stop on York Avenue directly in front of the YMCA. Metro Transit routes 538, 539, and 578 serve the bus stop during the morning and evening rush hours. Downtown Minneapolis and the Mall of America are directly accessible via these routes. In addition, these routes stop at the Southdale Transit Center where transfers Southdale YMCA Expansion 35 k(6 Traffic Impact Study can be made to Metro Transit route 6, 114, 152, 515, 631, and 693, The YMCA site is well served by Metro Transit bus service.. f. Travel Demand Management Plan Travel demand management plans work well ..in reducing trips back and forth between work and home via single occupant vehicles in the rush hours. The YMCA will make reasonable efforts to reduce these types of trips. The YMCA is directly served, by- Metro Transit via the bus stop adjacent to. the site. The YMCA implements flexible work hours with the majority of its staff and volunteers working outside of the normal 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. work schedule. The YMCA is not a large enough employer at this location to fully implement other strategies such as structured carpooling or telecommuting. So Conclusions and Recommendations The York Avenue intersections af'Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle ;currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, weekday p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012. No -Build and Build scenarios. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue intersections are anticipated to be contained within existing storage lanes through the 2012 Build scenarios. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after. the expansion, which will be adequate for the anticipated peak parking demand of 269 vehicles. None of the .study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. Based on the traffic analysis contained in this report, the following improvements are recommended: • Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. • Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. Southdale YMCA Expansion 36 W Traffic Impact Study ® The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the . YMCA patrons will 'utilize this alternate route if congestion. occurs at the north driveway. The additin of right: turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly. environment. 7o- Appendix a. Site Plan b. Traffic counts c. Parking capacity analysis d Capacity analysis backup e. Queuing analysis backup Note — To reduce the size of the printed document, it was determined Appendices B through E (approximately 100 pages of technical data) should not be printed. They are available electronically from Jack Sullivan at the City of Edina. Southdale YMCA Expansion 37 A 7 0 Traffic Impact Study A p e rnWd ix - Prelim ' ly � �� ,F, i ompa i . • .j a I• U F� 8� r I I � _ , I 09 fill / � s r------------ - - - -,, I� t� O O C rz = s — s � — s — s -i M° \ / li IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ���� '� � • C " �® Southdale YMCA Expansion Al Traffic Impact Study �' II II II ± \ -�- I � •� rat *1 / N 4 / i I 1�- e1 ■ is s s 111 1' fiJ;la J Sheet Title 380 St. Peter Street Suite 600 Drown Date Comm. No. Sheet I D. Proposed Site Plan MMS 10 Aug 2010 3.2010051.00 Project Southdale YMCA Renovation Edina, Minnesota Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 Voice: 651.222.3701 B W B R Fax: 651.222.8961 c ARCHITECTS Copyright BWBR Architects I M DI YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS ljjll�� 111111111111 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijilljIll fl4"" �SOUTHD� LE FACILITY EXPANSION AND RENOVATIONS L e tih�621 � �30�� RECE��ED 'w cv N V O� co 91 .9LVL£V DRAWING SHEET INDEX qpV Sheet Number Sheet Name I to COYER wrr, DRAWw wEr NDm At IDUUM&ASSAWLM RAN A2 IDWMGRXMLMRM AS BASB*W LEVEL PROPOSED RAN _—Al GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED PLAN AS DREWOR SEVATIONS AND BULDNGNAGE$ 2DO.C8 CIA SITE PLAN 2Dt.CG CA GRADAG RAN LANDSCAPE RM REF SOSIBK3amur10N8 v Southdale YMCA Edina, Minnesota B W B R RC 1 ECT$ 380 SL Peen Smm Si. 600 S.._ PM MN 55102 6512223701 C D r� G D_ YY D.Y Rq Nu LrA R. 8D1®[ OVriN pM1 EH�K am/p O� _— 4g 04` 4 lnk SiY.i m.ra. ..nc.a cwr. lhs ln.Qmm k 1' brN m e Ful9pe Ss.l. Drukp SabawNY FJ�sin° COVER SHEET, DRAWING SHEET INDEX AO C.pynght BWHR A, chits tte t y' s F n w .QouthdalC YMCA F.dina�hfinnesota a - BR aex c - 5e0 Se eeoa Sues. Strire 600 Seh, Rd, MN 55102 6512W701 irq�rn��.r.+•�rar4 YtW OrrinRil t�e0� �¢ Imp db RB tin lsd ib i® es OIY9KIIfIK GYlII10 44 O� O� —O4 4 -Ti9��yb• '. t>.eoECaq: llb d aeu.61' bne m e W � Otw06Cf W �pl1b Ftl � 616 Pn Un.n ovnno tae ow+mstm n EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL Al C.pyn& BWM ed*� E F N R� di a e e e e A IV Edina, Mimesota a Bt B R 1—C- 38DSL SdVPk4M,55102 6512=701 0 Pb bo Eeb �� E LIZ 404 O� — 4 �40 F iMOnO�/.b• 1lbbbeEw.b1'I.p FJ 9b baYq 6alwgpyb WI9n 5lbut O eNf/le IOB f Nf ' Oe1� »ltepefLp CY 5lm9M1 EXISTING GROUND LEVEL PLAN X 71m lVa A2 1>1WRR ArcW� G G Ml- 0 0 O X 1H BpSB.QNf LEVEL- PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN . U f tp-0 1 0 w°a +nrts°awra Wr�witl ��.m agXv MYDJWATM Km F lti 9slr�b• M1SrrEG91" meesm..wf•bam.rar oaea sor cwm rnau e.ua 0 o mno IM aaot�tm v smm BASEMENT LEVEL PROPOSED PLAN Sara CL A3 Copq ,BWBR A.AAR i LEM 1H GROUND LEVEL- PROP06ED FLOM PUN. .- Y Y OJr e \ y� \ \ admmur I \ I \ \ I \ I I Ica `�belioeecw I � I \ \ Nylg1 E \\ \ i LEM 1H GROUND LEVEL- PROP06ED FLOM PUN. .- Y Y OJr A "I MEMEME. -A m E Oa bv�RSe �� mm o- ®� aysb 011BY9f,N ObaY' E O4 O� F M1IOJQR'Ye lbe [a e[aesb t' eiV on a F'ul9b lberne bob eppl�b F116is Ei_LL O I Ds Dew OeTl,e NB f Na medal IPO,OY,m IT Shmlltle GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED PLAN 9—e A4 Copyright HWM Av-MR y� A "I MEMEME. -A m E Oa bv�RSe �� mm o- ®� aysb 011BY9f,N ObaY' E O4 O� F M1IOJQR'Ye lbe [a e[aesb t' eiV on a F'ul9b lberne bob eppl�b F116is Ei_LL O I Ds Dew OeTl,e NB f Na medal IPO,OY,m IT Shmlltle GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED PLAN 9—e A4 Copyright HWM Av-MR It NORTH ELEVATION AS 1nr -ra seen ...................... — ........ ..................... (1) 0; — DOOR AND CANOPY .......... 0 .......... -.: ................................ . .................. 1H NEW FROM —K AVENUE. NORM DMVE VIEW OF LEISURE POOL ADDITION LOOKING TO THE /a\ soun-WE gr I SH N BIRDS EYE VIEW FROM YORK AVENUE W-1w 2 e 4 5 7 A y Southdale YMCA Edina, Minnesota BWBR ITECT5 \i ,7 L- C-- . 380 ZP= S.— Sm. 600 S.i.t P..J, KN 55102 651=3701 c IYv 0 o 0 RauW Gap/. 5t-T EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING IMAGES A5 ,:,y,ight HWHR Amhi- J �++rr 1 I I I CURSOR Jr Za xDEs L 1/1' PWfDB® JOUR RDA rOV4A1. AA9110 r 211 z aew NawE AlaPa A BEa PAIN n iRRra r Q mw M 1®IWBN NuW. A MIMAQT TLV 4w LIIaD aLL AYDI a®OM6 TO I1aICO[ AIDIID M POlSiI°W AMID. M) SOME; D94 OIBIFIg Q ODG OBSTRl:lp6 ADF ALLOam N M RIIP Bf M TOM V IAMYEI. 1 aE1N A YtAY1 B NlW R DDIIOI TOR 16D f113SIW1N RNIW3 ND A 4S WIlW4 Slw@I 11[N M Pf7>aT16/N BAD 81N1 H B1r RaOlON M Nm1N Ar 511618 Uw. A fl.1tF DE D.L. THE DU (IWaIGUm DDS R M BIB! V Bx� aBil M B!iFLf.1aL MBM STSIFII B A PalarT YOE61L M Bx10 STYE E NWD RYBED W ILL M BM. 1 ADP IQDIMID M THE . OBE AIQAA sLUt a Y Mx N M DI�IOI or TRW11 AND SN1LL ENODD M FILL mM m ♦ m,) a BIa R11P. Re ! D J a 4' mtx DTPJ /W4FAlfD 00A[ AREA D1YL m1mASI 8 ! YW DTH MF) W6 THE N J ALLOWS) s a 808' N PAQ i B R11OIT IPOFLIS N M SDIM1016 anW M OIW W �M 00ffi4 4' M RiRTAaE aW069 9W1 OfIDD M RLL 6WM 2 3 4 8 6 7 m y d oim a ONNELR TO ER am 4 E CUECT TO ER CURB i ' .. CONCIE7E WALK 5.00 •. • ti I I ! ! I I I •.:. CONCRETE WALK NEW AASPHALT � 7� : ® NEW I i ) f i I i i I' i i i Vj RAMP I K6 WAL c01m a I 74.87 LID CD E 7za RELOCATE UtM • • �f . rdtlYY Q�J INEW NAU( FIRST FLOUR 6 9705 II I� 3 LO M LOVER LEVEL EMS `' / //, l k HC RAMP ,T'. /•' fE 1 ` 9 E e• - I I l H't; Al i "` 4.86 7M5 )'OW AVENI/E TH I 2 S7taRY aim MUM SpSp gNQ ; e ;c:l g --t- { 1 -4-j 9 `v� .+ rlt�' . 9 HT! 17.55 xa g M iI I I t I M To Lau , I__ --ELI �•'jl I I �- -I i' i i i I i ,✓�'' '-- -� 8 j NNII f --- --- NW CRB a TTFR e : i ° : C I y 0 S89W4 'W 39574 11 — I 1t1W 74th Std W I I � I IO019 NDTD DBTALL IN AtmDYQ VIM NWJACTUMM ISmaDm1TRI0 I'RRCLASx PW Alm WE L® A INTG6OGT EACH NOW OF 111.110111 Omm a TIPS Ir aDDL WBT E APP®VEa h AIDQRCT. M v rB+3m w. }AID Vr v 9H ®O®8 y 7 NAxaw r OL= d TOP HIM 4• B 14 A®LL[ V 1M10 SIN P VIR PRECAST CONCRETE RETAINING WALL I LEGEND FACE OF CURB TOOLED CONTROL JOINT D 5' WAIT UN ES NOTED OTHERWISE � nw EAR �,5. R'r `ea RCS• PxwmTr R Y B � e- °0"� I . �7• S/ 'f. . 135• SANITARY SEWER NAOQSD NEW CBICETE SIAFACE �;LISGPW 9Y 8• APPROVED JOINT SEALANT 112- RE-FORMED DFANSION JOINT 2D- 1g1E 3E OC WANLY OR AS OTHERWISE WHERE CONYOURL INDICATE, IGNORE 0.73,FT SHOWN ON DAIS. ALSO INSTALL WHERE WALIS ABUTS FOED OBJECTS UWE INDICATED ABOVE AND WiCI ATJODRM. PAVE ENT SLOPE TO PREVENT CUTER FROM 'PONDID.• CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NO SCALE NO SCALE TOOLED D 3' MAIL UNLESS NOT ED OT ERWSE 7/8• m— UNDOMCUNO Gr5 0 YARD UGHIT —n 8• CIA STEEL 40 SNFL DECIDUOUS TREE PAVEENR 3/4' CINNE 1/2• FREED. CONCRETE 1/Y 3/4• PARTIED YELLOW 4' O ELECTRIC OUTLET ---FENCE O CAS METER CONCRET CURB O POST INDICATOR VALVE OCONCRETE SPOT ELEVATION \,_er- CONTOUR APPROVED I SEALANT 1/2• PE- FORMED ET(RNOW JOINT ROUND CONCRETE .f' r4� 3E CL YAX OR AS OT ERWSE SOWN ON FUNS ALM 967ALL .U Y w IRNI aT. u1Mm Tay Nrer • oENOrzs IaDN WHERE WALK ACTS FRED OBJECTS i GRANUAR ROM OOYPACIED 9JBGRME - e' 2' DIL SIDEWALK/ INTEGRAL CURB BOLLARD W SOUL: NO SGYE ACE OF CURB Raj• 3• APPROYED•S/BCPADE S•- CLASS 3 ADM 3138 15'- ERIVI@DUS BASE COURSE YMOT 113 (L"35030B) TACK COAT, 3151 ' I.5'-WnA NOUS WEAR COURSE "OT LV4 (LVWE430 M) COTIOiETE R- 3�Y HCRETE LIAR PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION CURB OPENING DETAIL NO SOLE NO SOLE 2 3 4 8 6 7 m y d oim a ONNELR TO ER am 4 E CUECT TO ER CURB i ' .. CONCIE7E WALK 5.00 •. • ti I I ! ! I I I •.:. CONCRETE WALK NEW AASPHALT � 7� : ® NEW I i ) f i I i i I' i i i Vj RAMP I K6 WAL c01m a I 74.87 LID CD E 7za RELOCATE UtM • • �f . rdtlYY Q�J INEW NAU( FIRST FLOUR 6 9705 II I� 3 LO M LOVER LEVEL EMS `' / //, l k HC RAMP ,T'. /•' fE 1 ` 9 E e• - I I l H't; Al i "` 4.86 7M5 )'OW AVENI/E TH I 2 S7taRY aim MUM SpSp gNQ ; e ;c:l g --t- { 1 -4-j 9 `v� .+ rlt�' . 9 HT! 17.55 xa g M iI I I t I M To Lau , I__ --ELI �•'jl I I �- -I i' i i i I i ,✓�'' '-- -� 8 j NNII f --- --- NW CRB a TTFR e : i ° : C I y 0 S89W4 'W 39574 11 — I 1t1W 74th Std W I I � I IO019 NDTD DBTALL IN AtmDYQ VIM NWJACTUMM ISmaDm1TRI0 I'RRCLASx PW Alm WE L® A INTG6OGT EACH NOW OF 111.110111 Omm a TIPS Ir aDDL WBT E APP®VEa h AIDQRCT. M v rB+3m w. }AID Vr v 9H ®O®8 y 7 NAxaw r OL= d TOP HIM 4• B 14 A®LL[ V 1M10 SIN P VIR PRECAST CONCRETE RETAINING WALL I LEGEND CALL 43 HOURS WOE mGmO: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TINT Ch ARQ (!QI) 401-0002 IR➢E5001 LOLL iRF 1 -800 -732 -1166 I GENERAL NOTES: .01 TOTM. NUMBER OF FIISTNG PARIONG SAUS 32C 02 roUL NUMBER OF SINUS AFTER ADDITION 33L .N WE OF D=M BUWMNG 39,027 S71WE FEET. w SM OF ADDITION 22.030 SOIWE MY. M SUM OF BUILDING AFTER ADDITION 33.219 ARE SO FEET. .06 NET SUI IDWW VIEW E 98,228 SOARS FEET BWAUSE A PORTION OF TINE BNDITG RE41DE1S EAST= BOILING. .07 PROPOSED NET INCREASE N 110ENIOUS COVERAGE IIA07 S0. F7. SITE PLAN 201.00 O b L b aD Scds In Feet LEGEND TC TOP Of CURB PROPOSED CUM AID CRIER —STORM SEWER PRQPC= 1ECIiq WALL. © PROPOSED PAIRING STILL COUNT' SANITARY SEWER NAOQSD NEW CBICETE SIAFACE O sAHRARY —HOLE — PROPOSED NEW AMW.T SIRFAfZ / RV60C STI�RD CALL 43 HOURS WOE mGmO: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TINT Ch ARQ (!QI) 401-0002 IR➢E5001 LOLL iRF 1 -800 -732 -1166 I GENERAL NOTES: .01 TOTM. NUMBER OF FIISTNG PARIONG SAUS 32C 02 roUL NUMBER OF SINUS AFTER ADDITION 33L .N WE OF D=M BUWMNG 39,027 S71WE FEET. w SM OF ADDITION 22.030 SOIWE MY. M SUM OF BUILDING AFTER ADDITION 33.219 ARE SO FEET. .06 NET SUI IDWW VIEW E 98,228 SOARS FEET BWAUSE A PORTION OF TINE BNDITG RE41DE1S EAST= BOILING. .07 PROPOSED NET INCREASE N 110ENIOUS COVERAGE IIA07 S0. F7. SITE PLAN 201.00 O b L b aD Scds In Feet LEGEND TC TOP Of CURB FOR EXISITNG ITEMS —STORM SEWER 00 CATCH BL9N TW TOP Of WALL O STORY 11ANHOIE —.— SANITARY SEWER CE CEIYR O sAHRARY —HOLE — I— WATERWN SP SPRUCE Q MIvw CULVERT TR TREE (GEN) N CATE VALVE RETNNNG WALL wl W.LLON D POWER POLE --- UHDERCFtOUND ELECTRIC CNNFTRBIs TREE 0 LIGHT POLE — m— UNDOMCUNO Gr5 0 YARD UGHIT —n —FORCE MNN DECIDUOUS TREE D UTILITY NMHM' GUMORML n ELECTRIC TRMSrORWCR �RNUHC O ELECTRIC OUTLET ---FENCE O CAS METER CONCRET CURB O POST INDICATOR VALVE OCONCRETE SPOT ELEVATION \,_er- CONTOUR O 1/1 N 114 Dar PION .U Y w IRNI aT. u1Mm Tay Nrer • oENOrzs IaDN MawaoNT TBNo O DENOTES AWDDNO STAB taAIT (INTO) DF]IUT[4 WTDR141wN AS W01H M BTY — NOT IELD HERFIfD. WINaYARx: TIT 0I 1—T IOGTm a YBWNAVEIWE SLUM NI.AR M n T«E Sva.Ia waacArt M5 aro.N ,LOBE Tuv -DmR IT (nrr s EDNA oATIN) AAU - xw.waz s a snx Ac 6 7 �v SOUTHDALE YMCA EXPANSION ONA, W B /10000�� BWBR ACHE 8CT Laaon C®m 380 SL PA Sm=6 SWm 600 SaiBC Pad, MN 55102-1996 6S1.?M701 CW ENGINEERS C�mu c> =--_ a av_n r m ou- «r -,la D -Lw� r�F �NOa�w+rnwrlM ��LUMw N ap`� !� fArM I� OW B/D/1D WA6 I]168 d� � Dm PA10111C 001s6S90N 0673.10 *0� ' G01 0 NO "� DO III— Ofl2S10 (8H a.— Y BMful 3.2010051DD Eiel 2" Ib SM FLAN 9" ft 200.CS O°p,ftBI3W=A.k." ih I A D 0 C a aI �a a Ia 11ia =-4 �I ia�•'JLP..a' II l jl� � "II , _____________________ x _______ ___ ------------------- NIOPOM CURB AND GUTTER � __ � ---_— _-- ____`� �> PROPOSED SIGN SEWER — — — — — — PROPOED m7 IE710E PRWOSED seE10WtJL 0 POWER POLE �� 'JV CON6EROU5 TREE POLE ❑ LA:M POLE —AS— UNDERGROUND GAS o YARD Warr a II M UDlT1Y MANHOLE GIMDRALL - m ElECTWC TRANSFORMER / IxmE a EI0SIMO E 0 ,—, —FENCE f CONCRETE CURB IX SIDW sum SEVER OMET _ SPOT ELEVATION \ _,yy— ! CONTOUR O —IFES ,/x R FR011 GTfJI fi4� ,IONMFNT SET. WAMFD Tts "n.. DLwortS PANAwG — —T D °^ RIM= I— AS 91a�WaX HFAIEOL (011' Q —A — oATw) I N V= 850. AEA - xw.aes 5 tW S.TS At 3 LAN9 DF •8' 011 / / EACH 75• LONG PLACE 12. OF 11 ro 2 $• I / CLEAR STDNE LRDEx P•'ES AND Sum L , T n;• I \ \ I "T E,ITSNNNG ND I I I PRDPDSED 3Dra BEWB6 I Nm SUIP CONNECT li NT7PE m HEADER THAT ro EACH PPE. SAID MH I l RE BS7J E N Ir a I yp .f era • � i — , -� —� — j3jTW MNOO TRAIL — > -- — - -J­ I I Sad. 6, Fast � �11•`af I�'�� I � � �� 1 OR EMK 2 TO 1 ADJL67WG RINGS 12• THICK) YOIRAR JovlTS ouTSmE STRRE NSmE CLEAN. PRECAST COMPETE ROTC RUBBER GASKETS TYPIM OF ALL JDKM UTILITY PLAN 201.00 STORM SEWER NOTES: Al THE 4B• HOPE PIPES MUST BE BELOW THE OUTLET E"TIGN OF THE DOWNSTREAM COENECDOM TO THE EX57M CATCH BASIN. M ALL WSfRUCTlOM MUST BE N ACCORDANCE WITH URNFAOII MM REOOIIIEBATTONS FOR THE HOPE PIPES AND APPURTENANCES. S®uy d mw IIEI erwk m Tmelk- sartidde By (Im>ery "A"he PB !Cates Aagmt 1% 20I0 II I I 111 ll cy)� � 5 -1- 1 1 I I I I Newimpow surfamits: 1) Bdkkog I&= f x4 2) New ddewa8: memd west ead mth Oda d bo0digg 5,466 fat 3) Pkmzidewa&InNWmtedsib Ie336apine6eet 4) Added paekbg Inemlpaddeg Id 5,645 square bet 5) Paved idimdsseatdbMilRng450sgmefeet 6) sphab PLTIDd 4950 fat 7) Nm sidewalk and wa8 merit date db3fl ag 3,977 feet O New ddewa$ around Spbah pod 1,140 square feet 9) 7tdd sew Mom 39J692 aTpsa � h%—k— fir war ®ffiIIrams 1) AApha t &A 4,545 aimm fe8 2) Mbwd b and p ditg mxwd and mder dw ha0dlltg 1%60 3) west d btT�ng750 aq� [at 4) Sidewa8 m Lmd slate dbolttmg 3p63 agE®e feel 5) feat Net New, impwiom I IA67squmre fist B� I,aBitravm = 391362 r1 ®I-�.Idld by >z = 3,28D albietleti pmrkbd= 9pm L96ic test m8manm a0owed for baatbg wHh WSD= 5,760 catic fat E S T _ w -t- -_a -- - - -- -- - -- - ` -- -- - _ - r _ - - - -- —1 u T I• - -- =�-- -- r��' aam°,�"a I IS I cum I\ I IflA5o1 / w AL p � 1 qil, III; 14-9 �, , al ' a a ' �/ , I FF = 9705 LL 858.5 I `r VI I�I 11 vp / I mT �TLD¢I I �, I 7M5 YORK AVENUE SOUTH 5 \ 1;•� I s STOW BUAB ra TENS; IN masm I I J i I a G7DI BASAS \ (I I I mll I'�, ; - -- r —_--- I i ETa PROPOSED CONIMM — I­N v NIOPOM CURB AND GUTTER M 705812 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION �> PROPOSED SIGN SEWER — — — — — — PROPOED m7 IE710E PRWOSED seE10WtJL © F � 0 ``—Cis e7• e1 �. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 201.CG GENERAL NOTES: Di THE CONIRACW SHVL COMMT ALL UrM COYPNNES AND HAVE SAD COMPARES LOCATE ALL VWW (PLUM AND PRNATE) SUM ANr COISTMICROI SFALL BEDIN ALL VWOF COMROL EEASWES SHOWN ON THE PLANS MLST BE INVALED PINOR TO CMAmENEMERT OF CG6TRLWM OPERAT06 AND NINTAPND LWM ALL AREAS ALTERED ON THE SOE INYE BEER IiSIDIND. AT M0 0ON67M1C ION MAY MR! ON THE SITE WAR. OS14L ATON OF E DSDH CONTROL FACRITIES HAS BEER YISPEUTFD AND APPROVED BY THE CRY. .W NO CO6TRLV,7M MAY KMM ON THE SrrE LANG THE CONTRACTOR HAS COORDINATED A PBTOW6fRUC ION CONFERENCE WTI, THE CJTY. D5 ALL CONSTRLCOON 94AtL BE N ACCORDANCE WIN THE Cm OF EDW NO THE AWE 6" CEBE WATERSHED DWRfCT STANDARDS AND SPF7DIGTMM CCAM SPETgiGT05 AND wDOT SPEL4TGTTOS. 0 C LL 1s Han sum GDaarlG GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LEGEND FOR EXISITNG ITEMS 710M CRY AREA (Eel) 154-= TC TOP OF CURB 0 a CATCH B N STORY SEWER E epESCRA TOLL FREE ILWD 1- i' -1168 TY TOP OF WALL 0 STORY MNNOLE SWOM'/ SEVER toe CE CEDAR 0 SANITARY MAMMLE — I­N v SP SPRUCE O RYDRANi /'fit CULVERT TR TRR (GEN) N GrE VNVE RETAINING WALL WI W.LON 0 POWER POLE —.A— UNDERGROUND ELLCMC 'JV CON6EROU5 TREE POLE ❑ LA:M POLE —AS— UNDERGROUND GAS o YARD —FORCE MNN OECUTUDUS TREE M UDlT1Y MANHOLE GIMDRALL m ElECTWC TRANSFORMER RM1NO • ELECTPoC OUTLET ,—, —FENCE 0 GAS METER CONCRETE CURB a9 POST NDICATOR VN.VE OCONCRETE _ SPOT ELEVATION \ _,yy— ! CONTOUR O —IFES ,/x ,IONMFNT SET. WAMFD Tts "n.. DLwortS PANAwG — —T DNFOI on � NAT fETG•LSFWRE�. °^ O< �mmNA�� SOJI1 NEAR 1NE ,,� sre.EGT� Al AS 91a�WaX HFAIEOL (011' Q —A oATw) AEA - xw.aes 5 tW S.TS At • 7 �v SOUTHDALE YMCA EXPANSION mm&a 6 B BR ARCHITECT laerm caoomooe f/ 380 SL lira Saar, Sdte 600 Seim Pull, NN 55102-1996 651.722.3701 e ��1�IInc. CPAL ENTMNEERS •r Im W75J,D RAs a ,nm Lr, F. TNb :L. 001.69IIN LIa21I0 =wenetarlma•ws>QE IeLeeo eua AAV n rm ea •em N1 o N ��� �� .n G0 17 Out 0— Maio GIST Cbn 6 O,.ee a2mmstm (aTtt 6RADOlG, DRAMAG'F, URJiT, A SEDU�tT N COMOL PLU S,WL ft 201-CG C D E REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS ONE TREE PER 40 L.F. OF LOT PERIMETER LOT PERIMETER = APPROX. 2042 L.F. 2042 / 40 = 51 TREES REQUIRED EXISTING TREES ON SITE = 23 LANDSCAPE TREES PROVIDED = 15 PLANT LIST: Site Plantings t1y�� CITY. KEY BOTANICAL NAME _ COMMON NAME SIZE/ROOT TREES 2 SGM Acer x freemonih 'Sienna Sienna Glen Maple 2 -1/2 B &B 3 CH Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 2 -1/2' B &B 5 BHS Picea glauca deneato Block Hills Spruce 10' -0' B &B 5 AP Plnus nigra Austrian Pine 12' -0' B &B SHRUBS 13 DWE Euonymus alatus 'Compactus :Dwarf, Winged Euonymus 5 Gal. Pot 6 AH Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea 5 Gal. Pot 15 AWS Spiraea x bumalda 'Anthony Waterer' Anthony Waterer Spirea 5 Gal. Pot 23 Si Juniperus Sabina 'Scandia' Scandio Juniper 5 Gal. Pot PERENNIALS & GRASSES 55 KFG Colamagroslis acutiflora 'Karl Forester' Karl Forester Feather Reed Grass .1 Gal. Pot 39 BD Hemmerocallis 'Baja' Baja Daylily 1 Gal. Pot 5 BYS Rudbecklo fulgida 'Goldsturm' Block —eyed Susan 1 Gal. Pot PLANTING NOTES: Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant_ materials.. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's written acceptance of the Initial` planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. - All plants to be Minnesota grown and hardy. Plants to be Installed as per standard AAN planting practices. Use minimum 12' loam planting soil on trees and 6' on shrubs Contractor shall verify locations with all utAOies prior to Installation of plants. All landscaping and sod areas shall be irrigated with an underground sprinkler. - Staking of trees optional; reposition if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth - barked trees- fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peal pot. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance after acceptance of the work by the Owner. Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel -in materials If necessary. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted. Sod shall be northern grown and hardy Highland sod, no peat sod allowed. - Planting beds for shrubs shall how (4 oz. min.) weed barrier fabric. 4' - 6' of double shredded dark brown hardwood mulch and 4' vertical (cammerclal grade) black poly edging. The edging shall be placed and staked with smooth curves A hardwood mulch tree dish shall be provided around all trees The mulch dish shall be a minimum of 6' in diameter, 4' -6' deep, and shall not come in .contact with the trunk. See Planting Details Retaining walls are not the responsibility of the Landscape Architect. Contact the Project Engineer - for details. locations, materials, and specifications for all retaining walls. 8 t1y�� cut Ae HOURS MORE OlOfac GOPHER STATE ONE CALL inW CITY AREA (BST) �ShODO2 WO/ESerA To n3E 1-BDO-ial -IIeO a I Es. j_sM_ssa aOefEROUS 113E 1PIANRD1a DETAIL 4 o s s m an Scale in Feet . N Fay' �tam��na� DECOUOUS TREE RA31DlG DETAO s SHRUB RAMMM DETAIL r. 7 (� i.y `J SOUTHDALE YMCA EXPANSION EDINA, MN 6 . '* B W B R ARCHI EC laysm Penn Sava 6 1 Sr. Pea Sava, 5ho¢ 60D Saint Pacl, OBV 551021996 65I271J701. Cmtulmla ' # fat # a Eny rE9, Inc. J( crn warners aaa n.wn hnr a< ire. ICI. hhh.� eim 1 �.rawrs...brraa.- J ha�rrrrrrrrshrr. ssr Na. J Blhoo9,o Cow_ me e e..wa au,r a .rte J hem rQ De. Data \ PLANNINGCOIMISSIO/ ae.a1D - w�erhwrw ®m nvt iwAwrer— uaAUwlm om bona war c ws Taoe W.2S.lo 09 rasa xa o.em )OIX xXX sr Tr LANDSCAPE PLAN R 2021S Ebpy sinBWBRAnbi- t I e I A�. 11 O Rpl pOntp Hal A N nb1 I DOM r� I YAIE® 168 aTAH' NORM •Loom rrr rouvLl Hn.p pp mom v..: sTrL mrr D 90 SO WO mom r■omATnr m 1LOrx a rEROrroc roP rR a x1pRrt rocATm a 1Oi AVO6F laim NiA■ liE st SCALZ IN PM mt»a o M seEDr wivon As ■rpex NpEOL t1 "Tum)n n <arr v mrM NEA . 2gppY n Q 671A A0 TC TOP CF aw O LEGEND T■ TW OF WALL O O W E S.M SMRM mim — .— SNCARP M M CMAR O O S%4rfW rwiOLE — i —■ mbr SP S R= Q Q "IRANT —C."., i I M Wfl1A 0 POWER PF UNDOt 4 lC UND FIECTNC (a cmm� TR¢ O IlOTR POLE — w— UNDERCROUND CAS 3 I I MRZ 0 YARD INK —a —FORCE WN � 1rafE o unm wNlbtE �-- •-- mizwmR,W. gI I O QED M TWISFOR10 �—MM M 7 [ O cLemm cun.ET —r- -FEND£ b I o CAs MEMO mLSJa1E cm 5¢ 11 PmI M ICA101 VALW: OCONCRM CIIB I +� S'w EIEWLTM \rt� �cowom .1 � I I � I �e,E an I I. lot 1. Mm* 4 YOR MIK Hon.pin Cm". ImnN■et► Yuba /. Tlu I•Bd d■eer¢Ibn ord ■ —ft r ■hro Once ■4r■ obbmW Qom C■,U5. b W This No.4INS86. WTS bide "rW d d-uo Juo B. 2DBa) I aPI mrobSidt.hrcy drb■d bmzmWry Ilm Eoroudm C Im lri t—frr ft— W YORIRONIN ■M b not Add wM■d. TM pnSd mp•F■phY ■hoan ovn ■ por1l■n W OuBMC b Iw ' III I Wab.P m " — anw.' WdYlironadbrwvmptli ■mmtlrbrlWow•b�.■id)Mm i AUIYBr ap■r■mn do not oarNbdb rrpwd to beds■ rwpnb Oeorplr M Gww Sfm Oru CtB —4m I iw boundry p rpr ■ mh r tlihL B. Thor utimyopm■mr ■dMdo rrperd, oBm wet nw bob wVls Bom Aeb Bum Ims m So Cudoneh I ' dnomrwbr>abr•tlry orWdndt■r■pnood pNd■mWOtllmu l6daoubY■tlrbArtbdldbT� S 8 •Fhab■•rdom■n■d)obdamaorr Bibmw ■rrvlo mtld■meaws ni ■dldrw.emry st Iff nwb■bobd■2-o mad - F , 1nWandsuw-Pd..'nrA- C.Sr rd Io ondltlm durhp Wlbr metlr■ mq ob■sum olh nd■6 W®2- ■ddro■ ore bwW B&ud ■ w u"M r. D. Una Fo•Y■d by opwsbcM dtlrn a mq ■ Ith ■ &M bmdon w In B■u W such ■ bedlmA m Wry ca- E. r mssumb EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EMBCCIB ®BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAItFB PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT I BABT i I 4B HOURS IN IN ADVANCE AT U4S"Mn Fj TAn GW— Sbb OirCdl Tblot No. BOD2Z708. Ut■ F011a b Idgli ad FYI—wtlhd: ACCESS COMMUNICATION TECH (m)"541108 COY OF EDINA cater (61 CITY OF RICHFIELD (STZpislB3 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WDRNS MU).Y' S42" CENTER POINT E/4ERRGY (tt QINEST PW)2834ZU s I XCEL ENERGY (1n2)S3&4 M CALL a1°a YOu Gopher State One Call TWIN OTY NSA 44i lS OM2 TM FF¢ ' hep0-232-1= WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL L BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALUNC FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL DUSTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 657454 M AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANFIOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BARED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR 94AU REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE VMEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING /000� BWBR ABCHITBCTS IA— cAimmom 380 St. F4 Sven. 5.0 60D Stint P-1, MN 55102-1996 651.2793701 Orb r••a . wew.se . i.r■..p■ . toaL.Taa-Bc Bo AIJ. 7O 1TUFmLBrnLL i��wi��.'�..1�. Y ✓.rte Lases R �w O� hol h 2-L Orb KIP D 8/?3/2008 SOP ¢� arc zrA■■e yir OLiur■rII u®oca ■N10 oL r een Mav bds m ha. B/n/mm Moe D>m 6 Odd 39D1)BOB,m (� 2M sm Sbd 6 REF Cupy*1av &&ftm CALL a1°a YOu Gopher State One Call TWIN OTY NSA 44i lS OM2 TM FF¢ ' hep0-232-1= WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL L BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALUNC FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL DUSTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 657454 M AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANFIOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BARED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR 94AU REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE VMEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER SOUTHDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING /000� BWBR ABCHITBCTS IA— cAimmom 380 St. F4 Sven. 5.0 60D Stint P-1, MN 55102-1996 651.2793701 Orb r••a . wew.se . i.r■..p■ . toaL.Taa-Bc Bo AIJ. 7O 1TUFmLBrnLL i��wi��.'�..1�. Y ✓.rte Lases R �w O� hol h 2-L Orb KIP D 8/?3/2008 SOP ¢� arc zrA■■e yir OLiur■rII u®oca ■N10 oL r een Mav bds m ha. B/n/mm Moe D>m 6 Odd 39D1)BOB,m (� 2M sm Sbd 6 REF Cupy*1av &&ftm YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis YMCA Southdale Facility Expansion & Renovations City of Edina Submittal 27 August 2010 Existing Facility Photographs Building Illustrations Proposed Material Images • BWBR Architects CO 'I, a 04 P � Existing Facility Photographs Existing Entry from Northwest Existing Entry from Southwest YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWgR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Existing Facility Photographs Existing YMCA from North Driveway Existing YMCA from South Driveway YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Building Illustrations View from York Avenue Front Entry YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Building Illustrations View from Northeast View from Northwest YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Proposed Material Images Metal Panel & Glazing Metal Panel YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS gWgR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Proposed Material Images Metal Panel Metal Panel and Canopy YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 A ut��tWm.l. Plvc.]i m.oarePeu tncuarto]u.t P01 PWAIpM1p IEitt IIIB PaatcctWMlx PPNfNgI]E i0.VRlUGT WNI PNFI --7: r.rwacwttr]raLiWtou — I t�POOOtsmntcW II} mPm wmv� NORTH ELEVATION w tnr -rc 1F FRONT ENTRY VIEW ....... .... . .......... 14W 4F VIEW OF ENTRY DOOR AND CANOPY 6F VIEW OF FRONT ELEVATION .s r u nO iH VIEW FROM YORK AVENUE. NORTH DRIVE IH SOUTHWEST 6H BIRDS EYE VIEW FROM YORK AVENUE u r -rr u r.ra N I ? -1'P z ] A y Southdale YMCA Edina, Minnesota • ARCHITECTS Law n Comm 360 Se Pcler Sven, Swv 6W Saint Pain NN SS102 Gi1.J22J701 c 0 Nan. t�.r..c o.n o... mxtue o1x ]oenrw. ammo E O - - 4- -o�4�y 5 G4 — O¢4' 4 P1rEuc.O C..P. ,*...,.�. a I• bp.n. Pul rm bs.l w..+ro firrsa.PPNe ru m.9wn D du O..n Od�WnO 11N8 C...... N.. a.d.M ]SOt005tD] cP SM.et T•4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING IMAGES A5 Capyrighl BXGBR Aahil-. West drainage area (n w Link) 7P 8S Pipe East drainage area �S 5S New building to UG Pipe Entire building after addition 4S 2P Existing building UG Pipe V AuG 200 a S4 Reach on Link P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed,drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall = 2.80" Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 © 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: New building to UG Pipe Runoff = 1.53 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.099 af, Depth= 2.57' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type ll 24-hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80" Area (sf) CN Description " 20,143 98 Building 20,143 100.00 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: West drainage area Runoff 4.42 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.254 af, Depth= 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 25,787 39 Existing grass 77,450 98 Impervious 103,237 83 Weighted Average 25,787 24.98% Pervious Area 77,450 75.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) ( ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Existing building Runoff = 1.90 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.123 af, Depth= 2.57' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 25,000 98 Existing building 25,000 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft ) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage -for, Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage, to underground pipe Type // 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80" Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 © 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Entire building after addition Runoff = 4.21 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.272 af, Depth= 2.57" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS; TiMe.Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80 -Area (sf). CN Description 55,250 98 Entire building ex and proposed 55,250 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)' 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 8S: East drainage area Runoff = 6.24 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, `Volume= 0.374 af, Depth= 2.16" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall =2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 84,601 98 impervious 5,977 39 pervious 90,578 94 Weighted Average 5,977 6.60% Pervious Area 84,601 93.40% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs). 10.0 Direct-Entry, Summary. for Pond 2P: UG Pipe Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 0.00'@ 0.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug -Flow, detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage. to underground pipe Type ll 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80" Prepared by Halling Engineering inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 ©2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 848.00' 743 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 2,475 cf Overall x 30.0 %Voids #2 849.30' 2,827 cf 48:0 ".D x 75.0'L Pipe Storage x 3 3,570 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq =ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 848.00 1;720 0 0 849.00 1,720 1,720 1,720 ,.8491.50 1,300 755 2,475 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 853.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 853.30'/853.20' S=0.0100? Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0.03, cfs Exfiltration at all elevations scarded OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) 2= Exfiltration (Passes 0.00 cfs of 0.03 cfs potential flow) Primary OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) 't-1 =Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 7P: UG Pipe Inflow Area = 1.268 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.57" for 2 year storm event Inflow = 4.21 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.272 of Outflow = 1.21 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Atten= 71 %, Lag= 13.5 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 0.214 of Primary = 1.15 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.052 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 854.06' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 0 sf Storage= 5,662 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 679.8 min calculated for 0.266 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 669.7 min ( 1,428.9 - 759.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage. Storage Description #1 848.00' 950 cf Custom Stage Data Listed below 3,165 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #2 849.30' 4,712 cf 48.0" D x 125.0'L Pipe Storage x 3 #3 855.80' 4,477 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 10,139 cf` Total Available Storage P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 2 year storm Rainfall= 2.80" Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc,. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) . (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 848.00. 0 0 849.00 2,625 2,625 851.00 540 3,165 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) " (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 855.80 0 0 0 856.00 254 25 ;° 25 856.50 3,854 1,027 1,052 857.00 9,844 3,425 4;477 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 853.30' 10.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 853.30'_/ 853.20' S= 0.0100T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0.06 cfs Exfiltration at all elevations #3 Primary 857.50' 30.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 trded OutFlow Max =0.06 cfs @ 7.90 hrs HW= 848.10' (Free Discharge) Exfil_trabon (Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =1.01 cfs @ 12.22 hrs HW= 853.91' (Free Discharge) t1= Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.01 cfs @ 3.32 fps) 3= 13road- Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Link 9L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.718'ac, 87.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.43" for 2 year storm event Inflow = 10.66 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.680 of Primary = 10.66 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.680 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall-2.23" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 © 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: New building to UG Pipe Runoff = 1.21 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af, Depth= 2.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.0048.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall =2.23 Area (sf) CN Description " 20,143 98 Building 20,143 1,00.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) ( ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: West drainage area Runoff = 2.91 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.169 af,. Depth= 0.86" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall= 2.23" Area (sf) CN Description " 25,787 39 Existing grass 77,450 98 Impervious 103,237 83 Weighted Average 25,787 24.98% Pervious Area 77,450 75.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Existing building Runoff = 1.50 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Depth= 2.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall= 2.23" 25,000 98 Existing building 25,000 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage. for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage-to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall =2.23" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paw 7 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Entire building after addition Runoff _ 3.32 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume = 0.212 af, 'Depth= 2.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall= 2.23" Area (sf) CN Description 55,250 98 Entire building ex and proposed 55,250 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description. (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0" Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 8S: East drainage area Runoff = 4.74 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.279 af, Depth= 1.61" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall= 2.23" Area (sf) CN Description " 84,601 98 impervious 5,977 39 pervious 90,578 94 Weighted Average 5,977 6.60% Pervious Area 84,601 93.401/6 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 213: UG Pipe Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume = 0.000 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 0.00'@ 0.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall= 2.23" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 © 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Invert Avail.Storage Storage 'Description #1 848.00' 743 cf Custom Stage: Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) , 2,4:75 cf `Overall x 30.0 %Voids #2 849.30' 2,827 cf 48.0" D x 75.0'L Pipe Storage x 3 3,570 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum -.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 848:00 1,720 0 0 849.00 ` 1,720 1,720 1,720 849.50 1,300 755 2,475 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 85330' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet/ Outlet Invert=` 853.30',/853.20' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0.03 cfs Exfiltration at all elevations scarded OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) 2 =Exfiltration (Passes 0.00 cfs of 0.03 cfs potential flow) Primary OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) t-1= Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 7P: UG Pipe Inflow Area = 1.268 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.00" for 2" of runoff event Inflow = 3.32 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.212 of Outflow = 0.11 cfs ,@ 14.51 hrs, Volume= 0.211 af, Atten= 97 %, Lag= 150.6 min Discarded . = 0.06 cfs @ 9.00 hrs, Volume= 0.208 of Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 14.51 hrs, Volume= 0.003 of Routing by'Stor -Ind method; Time Span = 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 853.42'@ 14.50 hrs Surf.Area= 0 sf Storage= 5,662 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 838.7 min calculated for 0.21 1 ,of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 837.0 min ( 1,601.7 - 764.7 ) . Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 848.00' 950 cf Custom Stage Data Listed below 3,165 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #2 849.30' 4,712 cf 48:0" D x 1250'L Pipe Storage,x 3 #3 855.80' 4,477 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 10,139 cf Total Available Storage P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 2" of runoff Rainfall = 2.23" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 ©2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 848.00 0' 0 846.00- 2,6.25 2,625 851.00 540 3,165 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic feet) 855.80 D 0 0 856.00 254 25 25 856.50 3,854 1,027 1,052 857.00 9,844 3,425 4,477 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices, #1 Primary 853.30' 10.0" Round Culvert L =, 10.0' ' RCP, groove end .projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 853.30'/ 853.20' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0.06 cfs EAltration at all elevations #3 Primary 857.50' 30.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 4rded OutFlow Max =0.06 cfs @ 9.00 hrs HW= 848.10' (Free Discharge) tExfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =0.05 cfs @ 14.51 hrs HW= 853.41' (Free Discharge) LCulvert (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.66 fps) 3=Broad-C rested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Link 9L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.718 ac, 87.256/6 Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.95" for 2" of runoff event Inflow = 7.63 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.452 of Primary = 7.63 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.452 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed drainage to underground pipe Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc. Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Type // 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Printed 8/25/2010 HvdroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 © 2010 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: New building to UG Pipe Runoff = 2.32 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= . 0.153 af, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Area (sf) CN Description " 20,143 98 Building 20,143 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: West drainage area Runoff = 8.45 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.486 af, Depth= 2.46" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Area (sf) CN Description " 25,787 39 Existing grass 77,450 98 Impervious 103,237 83 Weighted Average 25,787 24.98% Pervious Area 77,450 75.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) ( ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment '4S: Existing building Runoff 1 2.88 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume=. I ' 0.190 af, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Area (sf) CN Description " 25,000 98 Existing building 25,000 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description in) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type,// 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 0260 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 11 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Entire building after addition Runoff = 6.37 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.419 af, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10.year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Area (sf) CN Description * 55,250 98 Entire building ex 'and `proposed 55,250 100.00%' Impervious Area Tc. Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description,- (min) (feet) (ft/ft) ( ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 8S: East drainage area Runoff = 9.90 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.610 af, Depth= 3.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Area (sf) CN Description * 84,601 98 impervious * 5,977 39 pervious 90,578 94 Weighted Average 5,977 6.60% Pervious Area; 84,601 93.40% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) ( ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 2P: UG Pipe Discarded = 0.00 cfs:@ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Primary = 0.00 cfs' @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing,by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 0.00' @ 0.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center-,of-Mass det. time= (not calculated) P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 10 year storm Rain6ll= 4.20" Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 848.00' 743 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 2,475 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #2 849.30' 2,827 cf 48.0" D'x 75.0'L Pipe Storage x 3 3,570 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq =ft) (cubic -feet) . °(cubic -feet) 848.00 1,720 0 0 849.00 1,720 1,720 1,720 849.50 1,300 755 2,475 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 853.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 85330'/ 853.20' S= 0.01007' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe,,straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0.03 cfs Exfiltration at all elevations Qiscarded Outflow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) 2= Exfiltration (Passes 0.00 cfs of 0.03 cfs potential flow) Primary OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 7P: UG Pipe Inflow Area = 1.268 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.96" for 10 year storm event Inflow = 6.37 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.419 of Outflow _ 5.59 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.408 A Atten= 12 %, Lag= 3.1 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 5.10 hrs, Volume= 0.223 of Primary = 5.53 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.184 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev. 856.39'@ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 3,094 sf Storage= 6,348 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 459.1 min calculated for 0.408 of (97% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 441.4 min ( 1,192.1 - 750.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 848.00' 950 cf Custom Stage Data Listed below 3,165 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #2 .849.30' 4,712 cf 48.0" D x 125.01 Pipe Storage x 3 #3 855.80' 4,477 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 10,139 cf Total Available Storage P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ , Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 10 year storm Rainfall= 4.20" Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 © 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (cu-bid-feet) (cubic -feet) 848:00 0 0 849:00 2,625 2,625 851.00 540 3;165 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq =ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic- feet) 855.80 0 0 - 0 856.00 254 25 25 856.50 3,854 1,027 1,052 857.00 9,844 3,425 4,477 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 853.30' 10.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet /.Outlet Invert= 85a.,30'/853.20' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe; straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0:06 cfs Exfiltration at all elevations #3 Primary 857.50' 30.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Qiscarded OutFlow Max =0.06 cfs @ 5.10 hrs HW= 848.10' (Free Discharge) 2= Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) F rima.,OutFlow Max =5.12 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW= 856.15' (Free Discharge) 1 =Culvert (Inlet Controls 5.12 cfs @ 9.38 fps)' 3 Broad Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Link 9L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.718 ac, 87.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.69" for 10 year storm event Inflow = 23.70 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1.280 of Primary , = 23.70 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume 1.280 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0:10 hrs P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type // 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall =6.00" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc: Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 -s/n 02139 ©.2010:HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: New building. to UG Pipe Runoff = . 3.33 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af, Depth= 5.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall = 6.00" Area (sf) CN Description " 20,143 98 Building 143 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10. b, Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: West drainage area Runoff = 13.83 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.808 af, Depth= 4.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall= 6.00" Area (sf) CN Description " 25,787 39 Existing grass " 77,450 98 Impervious 103,237 83 Weighted Average 25,787 24.98% Pervious Area 77,450 75.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity. Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) ( ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Existing. building Runoff = 4.14 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.276 af, Depth= 5.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall= 6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 25,000 98 Existing building 25,000 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope ' Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type// 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall= 6.00" Prepared by Hailing Engineering,;lnc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02.139 © 2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Entire building after addition Runoff = 9.14 cfs @ 12.00,hrs, Volume= 0.609 af, Depth= 5.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall= 6.00" Area (sf) CN Description " 55,250 98 Entire building ex,and proposed 55,250 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 8S: East drainage area Runoff = 14.55 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.918 af, Depth= 5.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall= 6.00" Area (sf) CN Description " 84,601 98 impervious 5,977 39 pervious 90,578 94 Weighted Average 5,977 6.60% Pervious Area 84,601 93.40% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 213: UG Pipe Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 0.00'@ 0.00 hrs .Surf.Area= 0 sf. Storage= 0 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground pipe Type 11 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall = 6.00" Prepared by Halling Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/20.10 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage. Description #1 848.00' 743 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 2,475 cf Overall x 30.0 %. Voids #2 849.30' 2,827 cf 48.0" D x 75.0% Pipe,Storage x 3 3,570 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 848.00 1,720 0 0 849.00 1,720 1,720 1,720 849.50 1,300 755 2,475 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 853.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L=10.0' RCP, groove end projecting,- Ke= 0.200 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 853.130'.,/853.20' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00' 0.03 cfs Exfiltration at all elevations 9 iscarded OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) tExfiltration (Passes 0.00 cfs of 0.03 cfs potential flow) Primary OutFlow Max =0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW =0.00' (Free Discharge) L1 = Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 7P: UG Pipe Inflow Area = 1.268 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.76" for 100 year storm event Inflow = 9.14 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.609 of Outflow = 5.71 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.597 af, Atten= 38 %, Lag= 6.8 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 3.10 hrs, Volume= 0.229 of Primary = 5.65 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.369 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Peak Elev= 856.68' @ 12.11 hrs Surf.Area= 6,005 sf Storage= 7,599 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 326.6 min calculated for 0.596 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 316.4 min ( 1,061.1 - 744.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 848.00' 950 cf Custom Stage Data Listed below 3,165 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #2 849.30' 4,712 cf 48.0" D x 125.0'L Pipe Storage x 3 #3 855.80' 4,477 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 10,139 cf Total Available P: \00147 Southdale YMCA \Dr Calcs\ Proposed Drainage for Southdale YMCA Proposed drainage to underground. pipe Type// 24 -hr 100 year storm Rainfall= 6.00" Prepared by Hailing Engineering Inc. Printed 8/25/2010 HydroCAD® 9.10 s/n 02139 @2010 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 17 Elevation Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 848.00;1 0 0 849.00 2,625 2;625 851.00 540 3,165 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic -feet) 855.80 0 0 0 856.00 254 25 25 856.50 3,854 1,027 1,052 857:00 9,844 3,425 4,477 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 853.30' 10.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, groove end, projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet /_Outlet Invert= 853.30'/ 853.20' S= 0.01007' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.01:1 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Discarded 848.00'- 0.06 cfs Exfiltration at all elevations #3 Primary 857.50' 30.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Qiscarded OutFlow Max =0.06 cfs @ 3.10 hrs HW= 848.10' (Free Discharge) 2= Exfiltration ( Exfiltration Controls 0.06 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max =5.64 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW= 856.67' (Free Discharge) Culvert (Inlet Controls 5.64 cfs @ 10.34 fps) =culvert Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Link.9L: (new Link) Inflow Area = 5.718 ac, 87.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.40" for 100 year storm event Inflow = 33.89 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 2.095 af_ Primary = 33.89 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 2.095 af, Atten= 0 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span 0.00 -48.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Summary of new impervious YMCA - Southdale By: Gregory 1-alling, PE Date: August 19, 2010 New impervious surfaces: 1) Building 16,226 square feet 2) New sidewalk around west and north sides of building 5,466 square feet 3) New sidewalk in NW corner of site 1,338 square feet 4) Added parking in east parking lot 5,845 square feet 5) Paved islands west of building 450 square feet 6) Splash Pool 4,950 square feet 7) New sidewalk and retaining wall on east side of building 3,977 square feet 8) New sidewalk around Splash Pool 1,140 square feet 9) Total new impervious 39,692 square feet Impervious removed for new construction 1) Asphalt trail 4,545 square feet 2) Sidewalks and parking around and under the building 19,867 3) Islands west of building 750 square feet 4) Sidewalk on east side of building 3,063 square feet 5) Total impervious removed for construction 28,225 square feet Net new impervious 11,467square feet Required infiltration = 39,362 times 1" divided by 12 = 3,280 cubic feet Infiltration provided = 9,060 cubic feet Infiltration allowed for banking with WSD = 5,780 cubic feet ° FOIE AREA WEST RAf AGE TOTAL REA 2i FEET, Se� E R`VF GRASS VQUT�E FE Fill 7 7355 YORK AWNUE SOU7H 2 STORY BRICK BUILDING RAINA6 -AREA L 14AREA 100,438 SQ. BLDG DRAINAGE AREA PE IP SQUARE FEET IM 39,023 SQUARE FEET IMPERVIOUS QUARE FEET GRA N 98 TC 10 MINUTES 0 31) so 120 ISO Issued REVIEWED BY Halling Engineering, Inc. EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP Scale in Feet I ---- CML ENGINEERS YMCA ADDITION I - DRAWN 3727 EAST 255M ST - WESSMR. MINNESOTA 555M By Mmm 952.440.1680 - Fox 952.461.3308 CITY OF EDINA SOUTHDALE YMCA, CITY OF EDINA. PROJECT 0001.47 COMPARISON SUMMARY ©LISTING VERSUS DEVELOPED PREPARED 8.25.10 m -cfs flov a Os, a rr• = Watershed Storm Event (004 type a 0.11 hr duration Existing Peak Flow (di) Developed Peak Flow (Cft) Developed Runoff Volume (acre &EQ Developed Runoff Volume (Ct&k beq S 1 LINK s yr =2A. tags 10.66 t0yr =42in 2392 2370 too -aoa� 3691 3329 T'dAmfffn-" 0.00 0 F I UAW PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE 3 LINES OF 48" HDPE PERFORATED BEDDED IN 30" OF ' CLEAR I" TO 2" STONE WITH 12" OF STONE BELOW THE PIPE. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL HAVE A 10" PVC INSERT TO RESTRICT THE 100 YEAR STORM TO EXISITING CONDITIONS. i fa N I: I / OV I,I , �o -058 I LO RKI FOR ` I9 A IOQ7YEAR >a STOO -•- ELEV 956.68 � �I 1 7� ] i � � " I ��I ' 11 X860_/ I� S DRAINAGE AREA) QTAL�4REA 90,57,,E� S;PI. I 1977 es�Q_FT. PERVIOIUi p „. 578 SQ. F f. IMPERVI,� 94 1 1 10 MIN I � 1 \ �- r A IIII. e 8]5 4t St IW- __.. BI Jl�IPIO lc, PJA: y:Al 9� ------------------ - -� >�I Issued REVIEWED BY Halling Engineering, Inc. PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP e 30 60 120 No `M 51 B1 MAL ajtVio G?H CIVIL ENGINEERS SOUTHDALE YMCA ADDITION 3727 EAST 255TH Sr • WEHSiQi, MINNESOTA 55088 Scale in Feet [DRAWN BY Phone 952.440.1660 - Fox 952.461.3308 CITY OF EDINA cRH PROJECT NO.: 0001.47 DRAWING FlLE EwSONG DRAINAGE MV.DWG SHEET 2 /l owWFe t4 -W Cn t7 1888 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. G. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action F� Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -89 Appointing Election Judges For General Election ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: Minnesota Election Law 20413.21 requires that the governing body of the municipality appoint election judges to administer the polling places at least 25 days before each election. The General Election will be held November 2, 2010. The attached Resolution 2010 -89 lists the persons intended to serve as Election Judges and Absentee Judges in alphabetical order. We will be placing between ten to thirteen persons in each polling location at the General, plus running an Absentee Ballot Board. I am pleased to report that 57 students responded to our call for Student Election Judges. We will place two or three students at each polling location. In addition, we must train alternates to substitute in case others cannot serve. When assigning the judges to a precinct we will maintain the party balance in each precinct and on our absentee board as required by statutes. In addition, this year, Hennepin County will be acting on behalf of the City of Edina as a part of our Absentee Ballot Board so they are named in our appointing resolution. I also ask for the authority to replace or substitute judges as necessary before Election Day. Attachments: Resolution No. 2010 -89 f,° RESOLUTION NO 2010 -89 APPOINTING GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES 888 FOR THE NOVEMBER 2 2010 GENERAL City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 2048.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the.Co'uncil at least 25 days before the election. BE -IT RESOLVED. by. the. Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on -file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina General Election Judges for the November 2; 2010 General Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED -the Edina City Council .also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under.the' direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Edina Absentee Ballot - Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as' deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 5th day of October, 2010. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do, hereby certify that the ,attached and foregoing Resolution. is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of,, June 15, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379. GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES NOVEMBER 2, 2010 Edna Abdulkadir Jeanne Davis Rita Acker Pat Dawson Kiana Adams Fred Dean Dominic Adams Gloria DeBerg. David Alkire Annie Dehnel John Alt Amy Demarest Carolyn Anderson Delpha DeZellar Pat Andrus Patricia Dill Pat Appel Charlotte Domek Sara Atkin Lisa Domke Ann Blyth Bailey Suzanne Douglas Lisa Batdorf Kathy Drake Mary Becker Sheila Duhn Carol Bertelson Sontrud Duke Katherine Billingham Sally Dunn Lisa Billingham William Ehrich Eric Bjelland Don Eidam Karen Blalock Sarah Ellingboe Jill Blooston Elizabeth Elliott Dodie Bock Jeanne Engebretson Juliet Boemer Kyle Engler Holly Borgen Laurie Fetterman Earl Boven Bob Fiedler Nathan Bower Paul Fink Katherine Bradbury Lisa Flint ZoeAnne Brandberg Ardelle Flor Mary Brindle John Fossum Kathy Bronner Vi Frana James Burnett Rebecca Frederick Harriet Busdicker Ginny Frey Margaret Bush Erik Gaasedelen Christine Campion Elizabeth Gabriel John Cardle Gayle Gaumer Sandra Carlson Briege Geraghty John Carlson Valerie Geurts Nancy Carlson Devorah Goldstein Steven Carlson Katie Gordon Pauline Carroll Carol Gottesman Anna Casper Myrtle Grette Marsha Chamberlain George Griffiths Sophia Charan Eunice Groschen Marilyn Christiansen Vivian Ha Judy Cipolla Muza Habeck Katherine Conley Barbara Halloran Eileen Cooke Eugene Haman Teddy Copley Mary Ann Hans Marian Cracraft Judith Hansen Colleen Crew Brian Hansen Richard Cronstrom Joan Hanson Byron Dale Shawn Hartfeldt Judith Dale Mary Hartupee Gloria Danielson Mary Jo Hasnudeen Daniel Dauth Lisa Hatzung Dean Davidson Cherie Haydock Sharon Hed Jacqueline Hegman Cheryl Heley Mary Henderson Janice Hidem James Higgins Bethel Hoaglund William Holden Annette Horton Terri Hudoba Shannon Hughes Myra Hykes Delores Isaacson Suzanne Jiwani Maija Johansen Kate Johnson Avery Johnson Kelsey Johnson Shirley Johnson Allen Johnson Marce Jost Mary Kachan Ann R Kapaun Dalia Katz Olivia Kavanaugh Katie Kay Ann Keenan Dorothy Kerzner Rebecca Kidder Leslie Kiedrowski Olivia King Jessica Kingston Mavis Klefsaas Marcia Koester Janet Kopp Julia Kosters Karen Krinsky -Leon Dorothy Kuether James Landberg Mary Landberg Paul Lane Gertrude Lappin Francis Larkin Mary Leak Patricia Leefeldt Bonnie Leer Alexandra Lindholm Bob Lindsey Ellen Loewenberg Cynthia Loveland William Lucas Celeste Lucktenberg Andrew Luedtke Barbara Maeder Linda Maetzold Lois Robertson Patricia Vaurio Julia Malone Judith Rodgers Ray Voss Connie Mase William Rodgers Terry Wander Boyd Mast Joan Roe Jini Washburn Tedi Mathis Lee Rogas Joan Watkins Joan Maynard Mary Rogers Jenny Weber Barb McFarlane Robert Rohif Deanna Weeks Rosemary McGlynn Emily Rose Paul Wehrmeister Frank McGoldrick Mary Ann Rosenlund Eric Weicht Joy S McHenry Luann Rosenthal- Erickson Patty Weicht, Margaret McLellan Mark Rustad Sasha Weinert Katherine McLellan Mary E. Ryan Mike Welbaum Joan McMillan Mary A. Ryan Birdie Westerdahl Carol Melichar Duane Ryman Merrit Whaley Ruth Mell Rebecca Salter Loretta Wold Jane Meller Marilyn Sanchez Robert Wolfe Ga ry Mertz Randy Sawatzky Sara Wolff Luana Metil Anna Schmiel Kathryn Woxland Karen Miller Alex Schoening Mary Yee Nancy Miller Connie Schramm Deborah Zierden Casey Mitchell Paul Schroeder Margaret Zverinova Janet Moberg Anne Schulberg Louise Mollick Craig Scofield Pat Montez Amy Scott Beth Montgomery Marion Selid Larry Mod Mimi Sergent - Leventhal Chris Mullis Katherine Sewell Ron Naae Lincoln Shea Barbara Nazarian Tim Sheehan Paula Nelson Julie Sheehy James Nunn Michael Skelly Patti Olander Mary Skoy Neil Olsen Joann Skumatz Carol Olsen Susan Smith Chloe Olson Ruth Smith Hannah Olstad Lori Snyder Ordell,O'Neill Aimee Sommerville Norman Owens Gisele (Gigi) Stangler Darla Paulson ' Krzystztof Stankiewicz Mildred Paulson Lynne Stanley Jean Pearce Vivian Steblay Wain Pearce Lee Strang Emily Pederson Don Sullivan Heather Petermann Ann Swanson Susan Petersen Philothea Sweet Edward Petersen Nick Thibeau DeWayne Petersen Nels Thompson Christian Petersen Ann Thompson John Peterson Andrea Tiggas Doris Peterson Donna Tilsner Betty Pollitt . James Tindall Linda Presthus Ngoc Tran Alma Pronove Lida Tunesi Felix Pronove Betty Ann Ulmer Robert Reed Robert Ulmer Erik Rehnberg Janet Ulvin Kayla Reininger Mary Vanek o e �y roRese REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.H. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -92 Authorizing Facsimile Signatures ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2010 -92. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The use of Cecelia Smith's facsimile signature must be authorized by the Council via a resolution. This authorizes the facsimile of the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, .etc. or other orders by public funds deposited with the City's banks. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached for your review. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -92 T -� RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -92 AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: JAMES B. HOVLAND - Mayor JOHN WALLIN - Treasurer CECELIA M. SMITH - City Manager on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in Bremer Bank, Crown Bank, Eagle Crest Capital Bank, Fidelity Bank, First Minnesota Bank, Marshall & Ilsley Bank, North American Banking Company, TCF National Bank, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo Bank and Western Bank, be and hereby are approved, and . that each of said persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. This resolution will be effective October 7, 2010. Adopted this 5th day of October, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk /1A, A�Nj o •lam �• REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV. I. From: • James Hovland Mayor Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -91 Setting the Interim City Manager Salary ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -91 setting the salary for the Interim City Manager INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Ceil Smith will assume the duties of Interim City Manager following Heather Worthington's resignation on October 6, 2010. In consideration of her additional duties and responsibilities, I recommend that the Council authorize additional compensation for her during her service as Interim City Manager. The recommended salary of $122,170.00 represents an approximate 10% increase in Ms. Smith's salary during the interim period. Ms. Worthington's salary at the time of her resignation was $128,000. Attachment: Resolution No. 2010 -91 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -91 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SALARY FOR THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed Ceil Smith as the Interim City Manager; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Attest: During such time as Ceil Smith serves as the Interim City Manager of Edina, her salary on an annualized basis shall.be $122,170. The other terms and conditions of her employment shall remain unchanged. ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 5th day of October, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 7-A 0 �CORPORP� _ 7868 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. J. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk z Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -85 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -85 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -85 u, ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Linda Masica $100.00 David & Sandra Frauenshuh $300.00 Renee Usem $20.00 Carol Koeppel -Olsen $40.00 William & Elizabeth Kane $100.00 Mary Dvorak $50.00 Pamela Badger $25.00 William McCabe $179.00- Jan Wagner Misc. Art Supplies Paul & Diane Schroeder $25.00 Wallace Carlson Company $418.00 Dated: October 5, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 day of www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 01 VU •,v v • \tea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. K. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: March 16, 2010 Subject: Resolution 2010 -96 Approving Master Utility Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project. ACTION REQUESTED: G, Approve attached Resolution 2010 -96 Approving attached Master Utility Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) has coordinated the efforts of the design build process for reconstructing the TH169/1494 Interchange Project. The review of the three finalists has occurred along with the opening of the bids. MNDOT now needs the three cities of Edina, Eden Prairie and Bloomington to execute two agreements (Master Utility Agreement and Cooperative Construction Agreement) in order for MNDOT to award the project. Construction is expected to start the spring of 2011. The design of the interchange does not adversely affect our utility system. Therefore we do not anticipate any substantial costs to the City. Staff and our City Attorney have reviewed this agreement. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2010 -96 Approving Master Utility Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project • Master Utility Agreement with the City of Edina g:\ engineering\ infrastructure \streets \mndot \169 494 interchange \2010 issue \resolution \item iv. k. res 2010 -96 approving master utility agreement with mndot for th 169 i494 interchange project.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-96 APPROVING MASTER UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR TH169/1494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT S.P. 2776 -03 City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has cooperatively worked with the Department of Transportation to prepare a Master Utility Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.164, the City of Edina previously held in 2006 a public hearing to consider layout approval and subsequent Municipal Consent of said improvements; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent was granted for the I- 4941TH -169 project on December 19, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City of Edina is authorized to enter into the Master Utility Agreement (MUA), MNDOT Agreement Number 96263, applicable to the State Project Number 2776 -03 on Trunk Highway Number 169, with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To cooperate with the Contractor to coordinate all utility relocation issues for State Project Number 2776 -03 on Trunk Highway Number 169. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following people are certified to execute the MUA and any amendments to it: Wayne D. Houle Director of Public Works / City Engineer Adopted this 5th day of October, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Heather Worthington Interim City Manager James B. Hovland, Mayor City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-96 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk Prepared by: S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Utility Agreements Unit Location: TH 169 and TH 494 Interchange in the Cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina, Hennepin County (Payable) City of Edina $10,000.00 Mn /DOT Agreement Number 96263 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) DESIGN- BUILD PROJECT MASTER UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF EDINA THIS MASTER UTILITY AGREEMENT, (MUA) is made and entered into this day of 2010 among the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation (Mn /DOT), the City of Edina; acting by and through its City Council, and including all of its agents, contractors, and subcontractors (Utility Owner); and' . , a [joint venture][ Corporation][partnership], including all of its agents, contractors and subcontractors (Contractor). RECITALS Mn /DOT has entered into a design -build contract (DB Contract) with the Contractor to design and construct State Project Number 2776 -03 on Trunk Highway Number 169 (Project). The Project is located at the TH 169 and TH 494 Interchange in the Cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina, in Hennepin County. The project includes grading, surfacing, bridges, noise walls, ponds, signals and lighting. The Utility Owner owns and operates sanitary sewer and water mains, their fixtures, and related equipment (Facilities) inside the limits of the Project. The Project may cause changes to the Facilities. These changes may include relocation, In -Place /Out -of- Service Work, protection in place, removal, replacement, reinstallation, and /or modification of the Facilities. The Contractor or the Utility Owner may conduct all or a portion of the utility work pursuant to this MUA. The parties agree to ensure that the work is performed according to all applicable requirements. In order to minimize delays, uncertainties, risks, and additional Project costs, the parties must cooperate with each other to ensure that all necessary relocations of Facilities are performed and closely coordinated with the Contractor's work under the Project. Page 1 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 For utility work identified to be performed by the Contractor and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section. 161.46, subdivision 5, the State may relocate the Utility Owner's Facilities as part of the Project on the trunk highway system.. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 161.46, subdivision 5, the Utility Owner appoints the State as its. agent to design and construct this utility work as part of the Project. Mn /DOT requires the Contractor to include the costs of performing this utility work in its proposal price for the DB Contract. The Utility Owner will not be responsible for the costs of relocation work that is necessitated by the Project and located in interstate Right of Way. The Utility Owner will not be responsible for the costs of relocation work that is the first relocation of municipally owned Facilities located within the limits of a municipal street at the time the street was taken over by the State as a trunk highway, according to Minnesota Rules, part 8810.3300, subpart 3. The Utility Owner will be responsible for all other costs, including Betterments. The Utility Owner will either perform this work or reimburse the Contractor for performing it. State law requires a written agreement among the parties to set forth the terms and conditions for the design, construction, and payment of the relocation work. I. Standard Conditions In the event of a conflict between this MUA, its incorporated material, or its exhibits and attachments, the parties will resolve that conflict or inconsistency in favor of the most restrictive provision, as Mn /DOT determines at its discretion. The following provisions are incorporated herein as terms and conditions of this MUA: A. Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 645, and the edition of the FHWA Program Guide: Utility Adjustments and Accommodation on Federal Aid Highway Projects (Federal Regulation), in effect at the execution of this MUA, and any subsequent amendments and replacements; B. Mn /DOT's Policy for Accommodation of Utilities on Highway Right of Way; and C. All exhibits and policies referenced herein. Page 2 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 . II. Definitions The definitions of the terms in Exhibit H apply when they are used in the MUA. III. Master Agreement This MUA is a master agreement that establishes a general framework for processing utility work that the Project requires, whether the Contractor or the Utility Owner performs the work. The actual performance of the utility work will be pursuant to Work Orders issued under this MUA, as described in Section VIII. A. LEGAL AUTHORITY: The Utility Owner and the Contractor warrant that they possess the legal authority to enter into this MUA and that they have taken all actions required by their procedures, by -laws, and /or applicable law to exercise that authority, and to lawfully authorize their undersigned signatories to execute this MUA and to bind the Utility Owner and the Contractor to its terms. The Utility Owner will attach a Resolution, generally in the form in Exhibit L, to this MUA. The State is authorized to enter into this MUA by Minnesota Statutes, sections 161.45 and 161.46. The persons executing this MUA on behalf of the Utility Owner, Mn /DOT, and the Contractor warrant that they have full authorization to execute this MUA. B. DELEGATION TO THE CONTRACTOR. The Utility Owner and the Contractor acknowledge that Mn /DOT will perform the design and construction of the Project by means of a DB Contract with the Contractor that Mn/DOT has procured in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, sections 161.3410- .3428. Mn /DOT's entry into this DB Contract may have an impact on the utility work to be performed for the Project, including, without limitation, matters relating to scheduling and coordinating the utility work. The parties agree to the following: Mn /DOT may delegate to the Contractor the duty to perform certain Mn /DOT obligations in lieu of Mn /DOT performing them, as designated by Mn /DOT in the DB Contract. Mn/DOT will retain its obligations to pay the Utility Owner or the Contractor, and /or collect payment from the Utility Owner or Contractor, as applicable, for the performance of utility work required by the Project. 2. The Contractor and the Utility Owner agree to coordinate their efforts and to cooperate with each other when performing the duties and obligations that this MUA sets forth. Page 3 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 C. REIMBURSEMENT REQUIREMENTS: The parties recognize that this MUA. governs the reimbursement for all utility work performed under it to the fullest extent consistent with applicable law. 1. All plans, specifications, estimates, and billings that the Contractor or Utility Owner submit to Mn /DOT to receive reimbursement must comply with: a. All applicable federal and Mn /DOT requirements, including its special provisions, technical memoranda, Policy for Accommodation of Utilities on Highway Right of Way, and basic clearances for the installation of electric supply and communication lines; b. State statutes and rules; C. Federal statutes and regulations; and d. Any other requirements set forth in the Work Order. 2. If the Utility Owner wishes to subcontract any utility work, it must first obtain prior written Approval from the Utilities Engineer before awarding the contract for that work. This Approval will not be unreasonably withheld. All bidding and contracting must be conducted according to all federal and State laws and regulations applicable to the Utility Owner and the Project. If the subcontracted work costs $10,000 or more, the Utility Owner must: a. Enter into a written contract with the subcontractor for that work. The contract must include or incorporate the "Audits," "Insurance," and "Indemnification" clauses in substantially the same form as they appear in this MUA; provide a detailed breakdown of the basis for compensation; and state that there will be no "penalty" or "winding up" charges for contract termination. - b. Provide copies of the contract to Mn /DOT prior to its execution or before commencing work under an already'executed "retainer -type" contract. D. FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS: At all times that they are performing the utility work, the Contractor and Utility Owner must comply with all applicable federal and State laws, rules, and regulations, including all environmental laws and regulations. The Contractor and the Utility Owner must require compliance with these laws and regulations in all subcontracts entered into under this MUA. E. TERM. This MUA is effective on the date Mn /DOT obtains all signatures required by Minnesota Statutes, section 16C.05, subdivision 2. In no event will the term of this MUA, or any Work Order, exceed a duration of five years. This MUA will continue, Page 4 of 29 SR 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 With the exception of the continuing records retention requirement, ongoing maintenance requirements, audits, and indemnification, until the earlier of five years or when: 1. All of the utility. work needed for the Project has been completed; 2. Mn /DOT makes the final payment owed to the Utility Owner, if any; and 3. The Utility Owner repays Mn /DOT for the Contractor's performance of any utility work for which the Utility Owner was responsible for the cost. F. CANCELLATION. Mn /DOT may terminate this MUA at anytime, with or without cause, on 30 Calendar Days written notice to the Contractor and the Utility Owner. 1. Cancellation Without Cause: Mn/DOT may cancel this MUA at any time if it determines that doing so is in Mn/DOT's best interest. Upon termination, all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, and other material that the Utility Owner and the Contractor prepared under this MUA will become Mn /DOT's property at Mn /DOT's discretion. The Contractor and Utility Owner will be entitled to payment, on a pro rata basis, for satisfactorily performed services. 2. Cancellation or Suspension for Insufficient Funding: Mn /DOT may cancel or suspend.this MUA if the funds necessary to pay for the utility work are not provided by the Minnesota Legislature or another funding source, or if Mn /DOT does not receive an amount of funds sufficient to pay for that work. In the event of this termination or suspension, the Contractor and Utility Owner will be entitled to payment,. on a pro rata basis, for satisfactorily performed services to the extent funds are available. 3. Cancellation for Cause or Default- If the Utility Owner or the Contractor fail to fulfill their obligations under this MUA in a timely and proper manner, or if either party otherwise breaches this MUA, Mn /DOT has the right to terminate this MUA for cause upon giving the Utility Owner and the Contractor written notice and a 30- Calendar -Day opportunity for the defaulting party to cure the default or show cause why the termination is inappropriate. Such termination will be at Mn /DOT's sole discretion and will not limit any other available remedy., Upon termination, all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, and other material that the Utility Owner and the Contractor prepared under this MUA will become Mn /DOT's property at Mn/DOT's discretion. The Contractor and Page 5 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Utility Owner will be entitled to payment, on a pro rata basis, for satisfactorily performed services. a. Notwithstanding the above, the Utility Owner and the Contractor will not be relieved of liability to Mn/DOT for any damages Mn /DOT sustains due to any breach of this MUA. Mn /DOT may withhold any payment to the Utility Owner or the Contractor for the purposes of mitigating its damages until the exact amount of damages due to Mn /DOT from the Utility Owner or the Contractor is determined. b. If it is determined for any reason after cancellation that the Contractor or Utility Owner was not in default, or that the Utility Owner's or the Contractor's action or inaction was excusable, the cancellation will be treated as a cancellation without cause, and the rights and obligations of Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner or Contractor (whichever is applicable) will be the same as if Mn /DOT had canceled the MUA without cause, as described in Paragraph III.F.1. G. MAXIMUM MUA AMOUNT. The total maximum amount of the funds Mn /DOT has encumbered under this MUA is $10,000.00 to reimburse the Utility Owner for plan review and inspection services. The cost of the utility relocations will be included in the Project costs. The total cumulative amount of the utility work performed pursuant to this MUA must not exceed the total maximum amount, unless this MUA is first amended and fully executed by the Utility Owner, the Contractor, and State officials as Minnesota Statutes, section 16C.05 requires. H. DATA PRACTICES: All parties must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13), as it applies to any data received, collected, stored, or disseminated by a party to this MUA or the work performed under it. The Act provides for civil liability for failure to comply with its requirements. IV. The Utility Design Sheet A Utility Design Sheet (UDS), in substantially the same form of Exhibit D, will describe the utility work to be performed under this MUA at each specific location. V. Quality Management A. If the DB Contract requires that the Contractor perform certain utility work, the Contractor will, at its own cost, be responsible for the quality management of the utility work. Quality management will include quality planning, control, assurance, and improvement. The Utility Owner may conduct Inspections of the Contractor's Page 6 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 work and any oversight activities it deems necessary-. The Utility Owner, or its designated Representative, will operate all valves and supervise all shut offs and disconnections for the construction of the utility work. The Utility Owner must notify Mn /DOT, in writing, of all cases of any party's noncompliance in performing the utility work no more than 14 Calendar Days after the Utility Owner knew or should have known of the noncompliance. B. If the utility work is added to the Contractor's work according to the Work Order process, the quality management will follow the procedure described in the Work Order. Unless otherwise described in the applicable Work Order, the Contractor will not be required to provide quality control for the utility work, whether that work is performed by the Utility Owner or the Contractor. The Utility Owner will be responsible for the quality control of that work. Any quality control the Contractor elects to provide for the Utility Owner will be in addition to, not in lieu of, the Utility Owner's responsibility. Vl. Coordination The Utility Owner will coordinate and cooperate with Mn /DOT and the Contractor to ensure that the party performing the work does so promptly and without disturbance to other project work, minimizes delay and uncertainty, and eliminates excess cost. Coordination will include the following tasks. A. INITIAL COORDINATION MEETING: When the party preparing the plans achieves a level of design where utility conflicts can be determined, the Contractor and the Utility Owner will conduct an initial coordination meeting before beginning the Work Order process. At this meeting, the Contractor will coordinate with the Utility Owner to address pertinent information for the UDSs and discuss potential conflicts. Once the Contractor has the UDS information, a preliminary level of design, and estimated costs, it will schedule a meeting with Mn/DOT and the Utility Owner to: 1. Review the Final Design and construction schedules for the work at each UDS location; 2. Review proposed resolutions of conflicts; 3. Coordinate the performance of the Project work with the design and construction of the utility work at each UDS location; and 4. Negotiate the Work Orders. Page 7 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 B. COORDINATION OF RELOCATIONS: The Contractor will avoid relocating the Utility Owner's Facilities to the extent practicable. If the Contractor and the Utility Owner cannot agree whether a relocation can be avoided, Mn /DOT will determine the appropriate course of action at its discretion. When'practicable, the Facilities will be left in -place and protected. When physical relocation of the Facilities is not reasonably avoidable, the Utility Owner will relocate (or allow the Contractor to relocate) those Facilities. The Utility Owner must use its best efforts to cooperate with Mn /DOT and the Contractor to identify any joint users of the Facilities and to assist in the utility work. J C. CHANGE IN CONTRACTOR'S DESIGN: If the Contractor makes a design change after the Contractor and the Utility Owner have agreed to a physical relocation of the Facilities and one of the parties has commenced the design or physical construction of that relocation, the Contractor and the Utility Owner must coordinate to change_ the design and /or relocation of those Facilities. The payment process for such additional design and /or relocation changes is described in Paragraph XI herein. D. - ONGOING COORDINATION 1. Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor will meet as reasonably requested by each other to review and coordinate time schedules and track utility work progress. 2. The Utility Owner will not Interfere with the performance of the Project work. VII. Technical Criteria/Performance Standards A. All utility work must be consistent with this MUA and the Utility Owner's current, reasonable, written specifications; standards of practice; construction methods; and any applicable permit requirements. 1. If the Contractor is performing the design, the Utility Owner must provide the. necessary written specifications, standards of practice, and construction methods to Mn /DOT and the Contractor no later than the beginning of the design. 2. If the Contractor is not performing the design, the Utility Owner must provide any necessary written specifications, standards of practice, and construction methods that are current at the time the Utility Work is performed to Mn /DOT and the Contractor no later than the date the Work Order is signed for that Utility Work. Page 8 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 3. If the Utility Owner does not provide the above - mentioned documents, the . Contractor will be under no obligation to follow them when performing the utility work. 4. In the event of a conflict between this MUA and the Utility Owner's written specifications, standards of practice, and construction methods, the parties will resolve that conflict or inconsistency in favor of the most restrictive provision, as Mn /DOT determines at its discretion. B. The plans for the design of the utility work must show at least the existing'topography, Right of Way, lanes of travel, the x and y coordinates of the Facilities' location, and the z. coordinate of the Facilities' location, if applicable. Regardless of which party performs the design of the utility work, the Contractor will prepare plans that show pertinent details of the design, including size, valve information, etc., the x and y coordinates of the Facilities' location, and the z coordinate of the Facilities' location, if applicable. 2. The Design Approval Letter a. If the Contractor performs the design work, the Utility Owner must - review and Approve those plans by executing a Design Approval Letter (Exhibit F(1)). This review must be conducted promptly and according to any timelines described in the MUA or the Work Order. The Utility Owner will not unreasonably withhold Approval. b. If the Utility Owner performs the design work, the Contractor must review and Approve those plans by executing a Design Approval Letter (Exhibit F(2)). This review must be conducted promptly and according to any timelines described in the MUA or the Work Order. The Contractor will not unreasonably withhold Approval. 3. The most recent plans and specifications will govern the scope of the utility work. When the final plans are completed they will supplement or replace these plans and specifications, as applicable. VIII. Work Orders Before any party can commence any utility work, Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor must execute a Work Order according to the process below, and Mn /DOT must issue any necessary Utility Permits (Exhibit B). Page 9 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 A. • FORM. The Work Orders will be in substantially the same form as Exhibit E. B. CONTENTS/AMENDMENT. The Work Order, and any agreements or documents executed or prepared pursuant to it: 1. Will include the following: a. Design plans; b. Any available, applicable design details; and C. Any Right of Way /easement documents at the LIDS location. 2. Will address the following: a. The scope of the utility work; b. The party responsible for performing the utility work; C. The lump sum or estimated amount of the utility work, as applicable; d. The utility work schedule; e. The Utility Owner's Inspection fees; and f. Any other conditions applicable to the Work Order that this MUA does not already address. 3. May also amend the terms and conditions of this MUA upon inclusion of appropriate language describing the change. C. NEGOTIATION. Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor must promptly meet and confer to resolve any comments or disagreements regarding the Work Order through good faith negotiation. The Contractor will prepare the Work Order after the parties resolve the comments or disagreements. D. SUBMISSION/RESPONSE(EXECUTION. The Contractor will provide notice of the utility work and a schedule for performing it in a Work Order to the Utility Owner. The Utility Owner will respond (by executing or commenting on problems) to all Work Orders no more than 14 Calendar Days after receiving them. E. STANDARDS: The standards, procedures, and terms in this MUA and any Work Order will govern the performance of the utility work, as well as any payment for that utility work (if applicable). All standards, procedures, terms, and conditions set forth in this MUA, and in all Mn /DOT Utility Permits issued subsequent to the execution of the Work Orders, will be incorporated into each Work Order. All terms and conditions applicable to the utility work that are not already included in this MUA will be Page 10 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 specifically described in the Work Order. Failure to execute a Work Order will not excuse any party's failure to perform any legal obligation. F. REIMBURSEMENT /PAYMENT. Payment for performance of utility work under a Work Order will follow the reimbursement process in Section XIV of this MUA. The Utility Owner will deal directly with Mn /DOT when making or receiving payment for utility work and /or Betterments. Unless a Work Order expressly obligates Mn /DOT to pay for certain tasks, Mn /DOT has no financial obligation to pay for any work described in it. Mn /DOT's financial obligation, if any, will be limited to the amount expressly stated in the Work Order. G. EFFECTIVE OBLIGATION. No obligation will be effective until the Work Order has been fully executed. IX. Scheduling A. The Utility Owner and the Contractor, whichever is applicable, will complete any design, construction, and /or Inspection of utility work according to a schedule described in the Work Order. If necessary, the parties agree to negotiate the use of acceleration methods (e.g., imposing overtime work or importing contractors from outside the local area) in good faith if necessary to meet the Contractor's scheduling requirements. B. If the Utility Owner is performing the construction of the utility work, it will commence the construction of that utility work after receiving the executed Work Order. The Utility Owner must notify the Contractor according to the time period in the Work Order before commencing such construction. C. Where the Contractor performs the design for the utility work, the Utility Owner will review the Contractor's design no more than 14 Calendar Days after receiving it, unless the Work Order requires a different time period. If the design is consistent with the performance standards described herein, the Utility Owner must Approve it and notify Mn /DOT and the Contractor of the Approval within this time period. If the design does not meet performance standards, the Utility Owner must submit its comments to the Contractor and notify Mn /DOT within this time period. D. Where the Utility Owner performs the design for the utility work, the Contractor will review the Utility Owner's design no -more than 14 Calendar Days after receiving it, unless the Work Order requires a different time period. If the design is consistent with the performance standards described herein, the Contractor must Approve it and notify Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner of the Approval within this time period. If the Page 11 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 design does not meet performance standards, the Contractor must submit its comments to the Utility Owner and notify Mn /DOT within this time period. E. The Utility Owner will have the right to reject any design work that does not meet the Technical Criteria/Performance Standards described in Section VII. If it rejects any design work, the Utility Owner must immediately notify Mn /DOT and the Contractor, in writing, of its grounds for rejection and suggestions for correcting the problem. The Utility Owner will review the revised design work no more than 7 Calendar Days after receiving it, unless the Work Order requires a different time period. X. Deadlines and Delays A. Neither the Contractor nor the Utility Owner will be liable for any delay or failure to perform any obligation in this MUA, nor will any delay or failure constitute default or give rise to any liability for damages if, and only to the extent that, such delay or failure is caused by "Force Majeure." B, When the Utility Owner is responsible for performing the utility work at a specific location under a Work Order, it will timely commence, diligently prosecute, and complete that work on or before the deadline in that Work Order. The Utility Owner must complete all of its utility work at all locations pursuant to the Notice and Order, which is in Exhibit I. C. If the Utility Owner fails to meet a deadline, except where that failure is due to Force Majeure, the Utility Owner must pay Mn /DOT the actual documented costs and damages Mn /DOT incurs. The Utility Owner must also pay the Contractor the actual documented costs and damages the Contractor incurs because of any delay to a portion of the Project because of the Utility Owner's delay. If the following conditions are satisfied, however; the Contractor will bear 100 percent of the risk of utility delays, up to an aggregate amount of 4 Calendar Days of utility delays per Utility Owner, for the Project (regardless of how many of the Utility Owner's facilities are affected by the Project): The Utility Owner has provided satisfactory evidence to Mn /DOT that it has fulfilled its obligation to coordinate with the Contractor to prevent such delays; 2. The Utility Owner has attempted to negotiate a reasonable solution to the utility delay pursuant to Paragraph IX.A., if applicable; and 3. The-Utility Owner has obtained, or is in a,position to timely obtain, all applicable Approvals, authorizations, certifications, consents, exemptions, Page 12 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 filings, leases, licenses, permits, registrations, options, and /or required rulings that are its responsibility to obtain. D. When the Contractor is responsible for performing the utility work at a specific location under a Work Order, it will timely commence, diligently prosecute, and complete that work on or before the deadline in that Work Order. The Contractor must complete all of its utility work at all locations pursuant to the Notice and Order. E. If the Contractor fails to meet.a deadline, except where that failure is due to Force Majeure, the Contractor must pay the Utility Owner the actual documented costs and damages the Utility Owner incurs as a result of the Contractor's delay. F. If any party fails to meet deadlines set in a Work Order, then any affected time deadlines for any other party's design, construction, and /or Inspection of the utility work will be revised accordingly. XI. Responsibility for Cost A. GENERAL: Cost responsibility between Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner will be determined according to Applicable Laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, section 161.45 and 161.46, and Minnesota Rules, part 8810.3300, subpart 3. B. CHANGE IN CONTRACTOR'S DESIGN:. Regardless of the initial cost responsibility, if the Contractor and the Utility Owner have agreed to a relocation of the Facilities, and the Utility Owner has commenced the design or construction of that relocation, if the Contractor changes the design, and that design results in additional design or another relocation, the Contractor will be responsible for paying the resulting cost. C. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. If there is a Dispute concerning cost responsibility, the parties will attempt to resolve that Dispute according to the provisions of Section XXI below. If a good faith Dispute continues after that attempt, and if Mn /DOT consents in writing, the parties will proceed with the, utility work at Mn /DOT's cost, subject to Mn /DOT reserving all applicable legal and equitable rights to later pursue reimbursement, plus interest and costs, expenses, and damages, from the Utility Owner or the Contractor. D. DEPRECIATION. Depreciation credit will only be allowed to the extent authorized by 23 CFR 645.117 (h)(2). Page 13 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 E. RETAINAGE. For any payments due to the Utility Owner, Mn /DOT will retain five percent of the amount claimed until Mn /DOT has conducted a final audit. F. SALVAGE 1. When the Utility Owner is responsible for performing the utility work under a Work Order and Mn /DOT is responsible for its cost, the Utility.Owner must give credit to Mn /DOT for the salvage value of that work, as explained in 23 CFR 645.117 (h), in the applicable Work Order. The Utility Owner will not dispose of any recovered materials until Mn /DOT has inspected those materials and Approved of their disposal. 2. If the Contractor recovers materials when performing the utility work that no party will reuse, those materials wilf become the Contractor's property. G. BETTERMENTS: The Utility Owner is responsible for the cost of any Betterments to its Facilities. XII. Performance of the Utility Work The Contractor and the Utility Owner may split the responsibilities for the design and construction elements of the utility work at any particular UDS location, or perform one or both .of the elements itself, according to this section. A. RESPONSIBLE PARTY. The Utility Tracking Report (Exhibit A) indicates which party will be initially responsible for performing the design and construction of the utility work at a particular UDS location. That responsibility may change, therefore, the executed Work Order will identify the party responsible for performing the design and /or construction of the utility work at a particular location. The responsible party in the Work Order will prevail over Exhibit A to the extent of any conflict. B. TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of any utility work. C. DESIGN 1. Contractor Design: The Contractor may design the utility work in conjunction with performing the Project Work if the Utility Owner so authorizes in a Work Order. The Contractor must complete the design according to the schedule in the Work Order. The design will be subject to the Utility Owner's Approval by execution of a Design Approval Letter (Exhibit F(1)). Page 14 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 2. Utility Owner Design: The Utility Owner may design the utility work according to a Work Order. The Utility Owner must complete design according to the schedule in the Work Order. The design will be subject to the Contractor's Approval by execution of a Design Approval Letter (Exhibit F(2)). D. CONSTRUCTION Contractor Construction: The Contractor may construct the utility work in conjunction with performing the Project Work if the Utility Owner so authorizes in a Work Order. The Contractor must complete the construction according to the schedule in the Work Order. The construction will be subject to the Utility Owner's Inspection and Approval by execution of a Construction Approval Letter (Exhibit G(3)). 2. Utility Owner Construction: The Utility Owner may construct the. utility work according to a Work Order. The Utility Owner must.complete the construction according to the schedule in the Work Order. The construction will be subject to the Contractor's Inspection and Approval by execution of a Construction Approval Letter (Exhibit G(2)). 3. Traffic Control: The Contractor will, at its own cost, provide traffic control for any utility work, whether the Contractor or the Utility Owner performs that utility work. 4. X, Y, Z Coordinate Information: Upon completion of the utility work, the Contractor will, at its own cost, collect and record x, y, and z coordinate information, at an accuracy of plus or minus 6 inches, for all Facilities that were relocated or installed as part of the Project, whether the Contractor or the Utility Owner performs the utility work. The Contractor will provide this information to Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner, and the information must meet the following requirements: a. Underground Facilities must be located and measured to an accuracy range of plus or minus 6 inches according to the Federal Geographic Data Committee, National Mapping Division, United States Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior's "Part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy of the Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards." b. All measurements must be reported in x, y, and z coordinates with reference to the Project's horizontal and vertical datum. Page 15 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 c. Horizontal and vertical alignment and elevation must be reported at minimum intervals of 100 feet and at each point where the horizontal or vertical direction of the Utility Facilities changes. The x, y, and z coordinates must define the top center of the Facilities, except for gravity lines, where the coordinates will be the invert of the Facilities. d. Notwithstanding the requirements in Clause XII.D.4.c., the x, y, and z coordinates of Facilities that are installed by jacking, boring, plowing, or other means that do not involve an open trench must be provided at the endpoints of the underground facility (e.g., casing or pipe) and at each point where the direction of the Facilities changes. E. PERMITS: With the exception of the Mn /DOT Utility Permits, the party responsible for performing the construction of the utility work at a particular UDS location will be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits. These permits include those from local authorities with jurisdiction over the Right of Way used for utility work outside the Project limits, and the other party must cooperate in that process as needed. The Utility Owner and the Contractor agree to coordinate to' prepare the Mn /DOT Utility Permit Application, Form 2525, as necessary. F. INCIDENTAL UTILITY WORK. Regardless of which party is responsible for performing the utility work at a particular UDS location, the Contractor will be solely responsible for performing any Incidental Utility Work. G. CHANGES 'TO THE UTILITY WORK. The Utility Information Sheets listed in the Utility Tracking Report (Exhibit A) indicate which party will be initially responsible for performing the design and construction of the utility work at a particular UDS location. That responsibility may change by the time the work will be performed, therefore, the party responsible for performing the design and /or construction of the utility work at a particular location will be identified in the executed Work Order. The responsible party in the Work Order will prevail over Exhibit A to the extent of any conflict. H. REMOVAL, PROTECTION IN- PLACE, AND IN- PLACE/OUT - -OF- SERVICE WORK In -Place /Out -of- Service Work and Protection In -Place of Facilities are considered Incidental Utility Work, and are therefore the responsibility of the Contractor. Removal work is included as utility work that either the Utility Owner or the Contractor may perform. XIII. Utility Owner to Perform Inspection A. The Contractor will, at its own cost, provide any necessary traffic control for the Utility Owner's Inspections of the utility work. Page 16 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 B. If the utility work is included in the DB Contract, the Contractor will, at its own cost, be responsible for the quality management of the utility work. Quality management will include quality planning, control, assurance, and improvement. In all other cases, the quality control of utility work will be assigned in the applicable Work Order. C. The Utility Owner may perform Inspections of the construction of any Utility Work that the Contractor performs. The Utility Owner's designated inspector will coordinate the Inspections with the Contractor. D. ' The Utility Owner may perform Inspections at any time during construction, and will perform a final Inspection no more than 30 Calendar Days (or another time period agreed to by the parties) after completion of the construction. The Utility Owner will provide the Contractor with a signed Construction Acceptance Letter (Exhibit G(1)) for the completed construction work if it makes a conditional determination that the utility work appears to meet the Technical Criteria /Performance Standards. The 30- Calendar -Day time period (or other time period agreed to by the parties) will begin at the time the Contractor notifies the Utility Owner, in writing, that the construction is complete. The Utility.Owner will have the right to reject any construction of the utility work that does not meet the Technical Criteria/Performance Standards. If the Utility Owner rejects any construction of the utility work, the Utility Owner must notify the Contractor, in writing, of its grounds for rejection and suggestions.forcorrecting the problem. Upon receiving notice that the Contractor has made corrections to the utility work, the Utility Owner will "review the revised utility, work no more than 7 Calendar Days after its completion, unless the Work Order requires a different time period. E. When the Utility Owner constructs the utility work, it must provide as -built plans of the Facilities to Mn /DOT no more than 90 Calendar Days after receiving a Construction Inspection Approval Letter (Exhibit G(2)) from the Contractor. When the Contractor constructs the utility work, it must provide as -built plans of the Facilities to Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner no more than 90 Calendar Days after receiving a Construction Inspection Approval Letter (Exhibit G(3)) from the Utility Owner. Mn /DOT may withhold payments due to the Utility Owner or the Contractor if the appropriate party fails to provide the as -built plans on a timely basis. F. At the time Mn /DOT conducts its final Inspection review (or earlier if the parties so agree), Mn /DOT and the Contractor will give the Utility Owner, in writing, the opportunity to conduct a final Inspection of the utility work. The Utility Owner must sign and submit the Construction Inspection Approval Letter (Exhibit G(3)) to the Contractor no more than 7 Calendar Days after the Utility Owner determines that the utility work was performed according to the Work Order requirements and the Page 17 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Approved design. As part of the Inspection, the Contractor must provide the Utility Owner with a certification by a Minnesota - licensed Professional Engineer indicating that the utility work was constructed according to the Approved design and the Work Order requirements. G. The Utility Owner's Inspection, Acceptance, and Approval of the utility work will not be construed as a waiver by the Utility Owner of any claim it may have under applicable law. XIV. Reimbursement Process For utility work not identified to be performed by the Contractor as part of the Project, reimbursement may be as follows; A. LUMP SUM BASIS: If the parties can agree on a lump sum amount, the utility work may be reimbursed on a lump sum basis according to the Work Order; however, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 161.46, subdivision 3, if Mn /DOT is responsible for the cost of the utility work,, the total cost of the utility work under a particular lump sum Work Order must. not exceed $100,000. B. ACTUAL COST BASIS: The utility work may be reimbursed on reasonable and necessary costs actually incurred performing the utility work, subject to cost eligibility and reimbursement standards in 23 CFR 645.117 and any other applicable regulations or procedures; however, this cost will not include costs associated with Betterment, salvage, and/or retirement value. If an actual cost basis is used, the party responsible for performing the utility work must develop and record the costs of the utility work according to 23 CFR 645.117 and any other applicable regulations or procedures. The party responsible for performing the work will provide the other party with all information and reports that State and federal statute or regulation require for such utility work. C. ESTIMATE For each specific UDS location where the parties agree to base reimbursement on an actual cost basis, the party responsible for performing the utility work at that location will prepare an itemized estimate of the relocation cost according to its standard practice. 2. The responsible party must submit an estimate to the other party for Approval, together with the preliminary plans, according to all scheduling requirements. Page 18 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 3. Upon completion of the utility work, the party who performed the utility work will provide a notice of completion and either a final lump sum statement or an itemized invoice of actual costs incurred to the other party. D. REIMBURSEMENT 1. At each UDS location, if the party responsible for performing the utility work is not the party responsible for the cost, the performing party must invoice the non - performing party for the actual cost or lump sum amount, as applicable. 2. The Utility Owner must use the Reimbursement Invoice Form in Exhibit,J to submit all billings to Mn/DOT. An authorized Representative of the performing party'must sign each invoice. The non - performing party must make payment on all properly submitted invoices and notice of completion no more than 90 Calendar Days after their receipt. 3. The payment will be contingent upon the non - performing party's final Inspection of the utility work. All invoices will be subject to post -audit adjustment. 4. If the party responsible for the utility work on an actual cost basis deems it necessary to perform additional work not covered by the Work Order, or anticipates costs exceeding the amount in the Work Order, then that party must immediately notify Mn /DOT and the non - performing party in writing,' prior to incurring those additional costs. The written notice must describe the nature and cost of the utility work and provide reason(s) to support the request. Mn/DOT, the Contractor, and the Utility Owner must Approve any payments for increases in the cost estimate in an amended Work Order. The responsible party must attach an explanation for any cost increase and its supporting documentation to the amended Work Order. E. BILLINGS: All billings for the utility work must be submitted no more than 120 Calendar Days after formal Approval of that utility work. XV. Approvals and Acceptances Any Acceptance, Approval, or other similar action (Approval) pursuant to the MUA: A. Must be in writing to be effective (unless deemed granted pursuant to paragraph XV.C.). Page 19 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 B. Will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If Approval is withheld, the approving party must, in writing, specifically state the reason for withholding or delaying Approval, and must identify, with as much detail as possible, what changes are required for Acceptance or Approval. C. Approval between the Contractor and the Utility Owner will be deemed granted if the requesting party does not receive a response 14 Calendar Days after submitting the request, except where the DB Contract documents between Mn /DOT and the Contractor provide otherwise. The requesting party must send out requests for Approval according to Section XVI. XVI. Authorized Agents and Notices A. AUTHORIZED AGENTS: The individuals below are designated authorized agents of Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner and the Contractor. If a party wishes to designate a new or substitute Representative, it may do so in writing at any time. For Mn/130T: Number 1 Name: Michael Beer Title: Design -Build Project Manager Address: 1500 W Co Rd B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Email: Michael. Beer @state.mn.us Phone: 651/274-7663 Number 2 Name: James Zigman Title: Assistant. Utilities Engineer Address: 395 John Ireland Blvd. MS. 678 St. Paul, MN 55155 -1899 Email: James.Zigman @state.mn.us Phone: 651/366-4607 Fax: 651/366-4769 Page 20 of 29 For the Utility Owner: Number 1 Name: Wayne Houle, P.E. Title: City Engineer Address: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Email: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Phone: 952/826 -0443 Fax: 952/826 -0389 Number 2 Name: Jesse Struve, P.E. Title: Utility Engineer Address: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Email: jstruve @ci.edina.mn.us Phone: 952/903 -5713 Fax: 952/826 -0389 For the Contractor: Number 1 Name: Title: Address: Email: Phone: Fax: Number 2 Name: Title: Address: Email: Page 21 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Phone: Fax: B. AUTHORITY The individuals listed above will have the authority to sign /Approve Work Orders, inspect and reject services, Approve invoices for payment, and act otherwise for Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor. C. NOTICES: Any notices that Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner,_ and the Contractor provide under this MUA may be e- mailed, faxed, hand delivered, or given by certified or registered mail to the individuals at the addresses set forth above. Paper copies must promptly follow up any e- mailed notices. The sender will have the burden of confirmation of delivery of any faxed notices. XVIL Utility Ownership, Operation, and Maintenance A. Upon completion of the construction of the utility work and receipt of its Approval, the Utility Owner will be the owner of the utility work. B. After it provides a signed'Construction Approval Letter (Exhibit G(3)) to the Contractor, the Utility Owner will have sole responsibility of the operation and maintenance of the Facilities. C. Once the utility work is complete, the Utility Owner must maintain the Facilities at its own expense. The Utility Owner may access the Facilities that are relocated or overtaken in -place inside Mn /DOT Right of Way'under a Mn /DOT utility permit. The Utility Owner must follow the terms of the utility permit when it performs any service or maintenance work. The Utility Owner may only open and disturb the trunk highway Right of Way without a permit in the case of an emergency that is dangerous to the public and requires immediate attention. Upon learning of an emergency, the Utility Owner must immediately notify the State Patrol. The Utility Owner must take all necessary and reasonable safety measures to protect the public and must cooperate fully with the State Patrol. In this event, the Utility Owner must request a permit from the proper authority no later than the following Working Day. D. All terms and conditions in the Utility Permits that Mn /DOT has already issued for the Facilities will continue to apply unless subsequent Mn /DOT utility permits supersede them. If the Utility Owner has Facilities located in the Right of Way of the Project without a current utility permit, it must promptly apply for that utility permit. Mn /DOT may, in its reasonable discretion, issue a utility permit to the Utility Owner or require the Utility Owner to relocate the Facilities off of Mn /DOT Right of Way, unless the Page 22 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Facilities pre- existed Mn /DOT's construction of the highway. If the Utility Owner must relocate off the Right of Way, it will do so at its own cost. XVIII. Betterment A. As Mn /DOT determines at its discretion, Betterment work may be eligible to be performed if. The work is compatible with the Project Work; 2. The work would not Interfere with the Project Schedule; or 3. It is feasible to separate the Betterment work from any related utility work that the Contractor is responsible for performing. B. If the Utility Owner wishes to include eligible Betterment work at a specific location where the Contractor is responsible for performing the work, the Utility Owner will negotiate the cost (on a lump sum or actual cost basis) for that Betterment work directly with the Contractor. The Utility Owner must provide a copy of that lump sum amount or actual cost estimate to Mn /DOT with a Resolution in the form of Exhibit M. The Utility Owner will be responsible for the cost of .any Betterment work. If the Utility Owner authorizes the Contractor to do the Betterment work, Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor must execute a Work Order describing the terms and conditions of that work. Upon the execution of the Work Order, the Utility Owner will pay the negotiated price of the Betterment work to Mn /DOT. Mn/DOT will then add the Betterment work to the DB Contract with the Contractor. 2. If the parties cannot agree to a lump sum cost for the Betterment work, the Contractor will perform the work on a time and materials basis pursuant to the DB Contract. The Utility Owner will pay Mn /DOT the total, actually incurred cost on that basis. a. If the Contractor performs the work on an estimated time and materials basis, and the actual costs for the work exceed the estimated amount, the Utility Owner will pay those excess costs to Mn /DOT. b. If the Contractor performs the work on an estimated time and materials basis, and the actual costs for the work are less than the estimated amount, Mn /DOT will refund the remaining funds to the Utility Owner. Page 23 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Mn /DOT will make that refund no more than 30 Calendar Days after receiving an invoice and supporting documentation for that work. 3. If the Utility Owner does not accept the Contractor's offered price for the Betterment work, the Utility Owner may reject that price. The Utility Owner may then select a different contractor to perform the Betterment work, provided that the performance complies with the Contractor's Project schedule. Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor will execute a Work Order to describe the terms and conditions of that Betterment work. XIX. Continuity of Service A. All Facilities must remain fully operational during all phases of construction, except as the Utility Owner specifically allows or Approves in writing. B. To the greatest extent practicable, the Contractor must take measures to ensure that all of the Facilities remain operational at all times. Necessary interruptions of service, including shut downs and temporary diversions, must be described in the Work Order and are subject to the Utility. Owner's Approval. If the Contractor is responsible for performing the utility work, the Contractor; at its own cost, must do the following to maintain continuity: 1. Coordinate with the Utility Owner regarding any schedule, design, construction, and Inspection of the utility work; 2. Keep the Utility Owner fully informed about changes that may affect the Facilities; 3. Include the Utility Owner when making decisions that affect the Facilities so that the Utility Owner can make arrangements to provide uninterrupted or minimally interrupted service to its customers; and 4. Comply with any additional, reasonable service continuity conditions described in the applicable Work Orders. XX. Damage to Facilities and Other Property The Contractor and the Utility Owner must exercise due caution and care to avoid causing damage to the Facilities or the Project when performing utility work or Project work. The Contractor will be responsible for any damages it causes to the Utility Owner's property, Facilities, structures, or persons. The Utility Owner will be responsible for any damages it Page 24 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 causes to the Contractor's property, facilities, structures, or persons. The damaging party must immediately notify the other party of the occurrence of any damage and will be responsible for the repair or cost of the damage, at its own expense, to the other party's reasonable satisfaction. XXI. Partnering The DB Contract includes a section establishing a "partnership" process. That section is attached hereto as Exhibit N. Except where the terms of this MUA expressly exempt it, every disagreement between the Utility Owner and the Contractor, and /or between the Utility Owner and Mn /DOT (Dispute) arising under this MUA, is a Dispute subject to the terms of this section. When a Dispute arises, the Utility Owner and the other party(ies) to the Dispute must first attempt to informally resolve it. A. If the Dispute is between the Utility Owner and the Contractor, and the parties are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution, either party may escalate the Dispute to the Mn /DOT project manager, as identified by Mn /DOT. If the Mn /DOT project manager is unable to resolve the Dispute to the parties' mutual satisfaction, the Utility Owner and the Contractor will attempt to resolve the matter through the partnering process. B. If the Dispute is between the Utility Owner and Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner and the Mn/DOT project manager must first attempt to informally resolve the Dispute. If the Utility Owner and the Mn /DOT project manager are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution, the parties will attempt to resolve the matter through, the partnering process. XXII. Indemnification A. Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner will each be responsible for their own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law. Minnesota Statutes, section 3.736 and other applicable law govern Mn /DOT's liability. Minnesota Statutes, chapter 466 and other applicable law govern the Utility Owner's liability. Each party will be solely responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims.. B. The Utility Owner does not waive any defense or immunity of third parties. The Utility Owner, in defending an action on behalf of Mn /DOT, will be entitled to assert every defense or immunity that Mn /DOT could assert on its own behalf. Page 25 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 XXIII. Claims The Utility Owner certifies that its workers compensation insurance coverage complies with Minnesota Statutes, section 176.181, subdivision 2. The Utility Owner's employees and agents are not considered State employees. Mn /DOT is not responsible for any claims asserted by the Utility Owner's employees, agents, subcontractors, or any third parties under the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act. Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation Act. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions, and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes, section 3.3736 and other applicable law govern the liability of Mn /DOT. XXIV. Insurance This section is not used in this MUA. XXV. No Liens The Contractor will keep the relocated Facilities free from any statutory or common law lien arising out of any utility work it performs, materials it furnishes, or obligations it incurs. The Utility Owner will keep the relocated Facilities, the Project, and the Right of Way free from any statutory or common law lien arising out of any utility work it performs, materials it furnishes, or obligations it incurs. XXVI. No Offsets The utility work performed under each Work Order will be treated as a separate job with separate billing. There will be no offsets between the amounts one party owes the other, whether for the same Work Order or for different Work Orders, except for the Betterment, salvage, and/or retirement value credits described in this MUA. XXVII. Audits and Retention of Records All parties must keep and maintain all books, papers, records, accounting records, documents, procedures, practices, and other material relating to the utility work, including detailed records to support all bills it submits, for a period of 6 years after the date of Acceptance of the completed utility work. These items are subject to a legislative or State audit. Each party, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and any other agency that provides funding to Mn/DOT (including each agency's respective auditors) will have access and be entitled to audit all of these items during normal business hours upon reasonable notice to the party maintaining the records. Mn /DOT, the Contractor, and the Utility Owner Page 26 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 must insert these requirements into, any contracts they enter into for the utility work. Such contracts must also include a clause requiring their contractors to include these requirements in any subcontracts or purchase orders. Mn /DOT, the Contractor, and the Utility Owner must mutually agree upon any financial adjustments any audit finds necessary. If Mn /DOT, the Contractor, and the Utility Owner are unable to agree upon an adjustment, the parties must follow the process in Section XXI of this MUA to resolve that adjustment. XXVIII. Third -Party Beneficiary There are no third -party beneficiaries to this MUA. XXIX. Waiver A party s failure to enforce a provision of this MUA does not waive the provision, or the party's right to subsequently enforce it. XXX. Nondiscrimination A. The Utility Owner will comply with the United States Department of Transportation's nondiscrimination regulations. These regulations are in the current version of the Code of Federal Regulations, title 49, part 21. The Utility Owner must incorporate these regulations by reference in all contracts. B. Minnesota Statutes, section 181.59 and any applicable local ordinances pertaining to civil rights and nondiscrimination are considered part of this MUA. )=I. Merger /Amendments This MUA contains all negotiations and agreements between Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor.' No prior oral or written communications, understandings, or agreements may be used to bind either party. Any amendment to this MUA must be in writing. An amendment will not be effective until the same parties who signed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office, sign and approve the amendment. The remainder of this page was left blank intentionally. Page 27 of 29 S.P 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement by their duly authorized officers. CITY OF EDINA By: Mayor Date: By: City Manager Date: . Page 28 of 29 S.P 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Utility Owner: City of Edina STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION State Encumbrance Verification Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as Required by Minnesota Statutes §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05. By: MAPS Contract Number: Date: MAPS Order Number: Department of Transportation Recommended for Approval: Approved: By: By: Metro Utility Coordinator Director, Office of Technical Support Date: Date: Office of Contract Management Department of Administration Approved as to Form and Execution: ' By: By: Date: Date: CONTRACTOR By: Its: Date: Page 29 of 29 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Design -Build Project Master Utility Agreement Exhibits With the City of Edina Agreement Number 96263 Table of Contents Exhibit A — Utility Tracking Report Exhibit B — Mn /DOT Utility Permit Application Exhibit C — Not Used Exhibit D — Mn /DOT Design -Build Project Utility Design Sheet Exhibit E(1) — Design Work Order Exhibit E(2) — Construction Work Order Exhibit F(1) — Utility Owner's Design Approval Letter Exhibit F(2) — Contractor's Design Approval Letter Exhibit G(1) — Utility Owner's Construction Inspection Acceptance Letter Exhibit G(2) — Contractor's Construction Inspection Approval Letter Exhibit G(3) — Utility Owner's Construction Inspection Approval Letter Exhibit H — MUA Definitions Exhibit I — Mn/DOT Notice and Order Exhibit J — Utility Owner's Reimbursement Invoice Form Exhibit K — Not Used Exhibit L — Example City Resolution Exhibit M — Example'City Resolution (For Betterment Work) Exhibit N — Partnering, Claims for Adjustment and Disputes S.P. 2776-03 (f.H.169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT A Utility Tracking Report UTILITY TRACKING REPORT LUZ MENuTiLrrY - Exhibit A. Page 1 of 1 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT B Mn /DOT Utility Permit Application S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 wt6T TP-1526, (reAsed 34P) Page 1 4TATE OF MINNESOTA SUBMIT 1. CONEY:CQMPLETED PEPARTMONT OF TRANVORTATION FOW WITH 1 "0. SVTS OF, APPLfi;AT1'0N FORUTILITY PFRMIT ON SIMICHES, ISJO 1ARGMTHAN 14MI TO: TRUNK HIGHWAY.RIGHT OFMAY Utillire,aginbet - WS 618 k-6i�i�ta,be'parime�t-ofTanspprtapp" T 16t, 2—=0 I.. ding INMUCTIONS' 1. Corn�letevnllypagevnejno photocooles) 819wo ornpleted fbirm 5 kn 00 - A0406ANT tlketche%. no larner than. il x 17 St P*uli MN 55155.11899. Company Project No. HWY,No. .9EQ. W. Agreement No: 171 racifity rlge�w-�— CWTQwnihip I Swe P.eqdct rib.. Apoibidoll i'wher6prinade:4op I�vF'Msikri� plac*.�-oonstruct and thereafter, maintain a: Trutik H41hway Na . V44 91 tho'MR. (Norlt�Sxffll-a t) I a � A ' EIRIAL CONSTRUOTJON (Ch . ecka . mpd . a*b0X-) 6LOWOUT'20 -IWFOR"tIOA L10HT10011 (pptidui#of M' 6h)qnt ErWeIcO'0). sAast A. U.0h [3-'61b#L-pck A 1+17mme C3'vWcaL Typ.0-pr1p.mp Watts. j411100. DVeylddal 400"rM C1Pd#ny.0 Poles tll§�eakaway 0000r. — ON6n-Wekkeway bl'C"cluoas 0* .PEP INPIO_ EIY615� awa, kumber-Obbrictudors-Tym 6zealConductorA,dable FACILITY TYPE CA'$IN0- 13 k, s-dclype) MAX dper, Ore& E3.8teel pipe WallthIcImest Q.Sectlaft[Cancrete G?Odo ' [1011M� wamidicness E36 k6wW'concrete Grade 11wirch Depth Class 13PRi NM�A.W [3tXre;Uqn cri METHOD OFINSTALLING ;JNDER R.QADBED4.(1fopen,#encfi, 9xplAin why;new ary) alB.1 119 Ill. WENTALOC.ATIO .AOFTREE.T.RIM IN AN. IORC INQ: M.'Q LEAR V. Wftlo.darton or after O%er d-Fadlity aj0't6bq-cqmpIe�edb 6Y 0 .01 0. qrp 0.2) W Tbo.�ppplicahtirf,tartyjhgzOO41t;t.lh-oWb.r�'..fiildntidne4ikbovpOrrOfprrOO . .. . . . . . . to I - W-ft s ap oilcat Ion and Int he Permilt -fbrco111S;Ii.uc6Dn issued therefore, Address iihik)l sW&-6onfQfth f6: . 1:116-10 rills;ofthwPdrivilt ArldtheRU16i bfthd Statwof Mjfin,, s6t'16iih in #101riesotO161Z iil§� do of.July. 31-, � CRY. wh M a 083topilfift �'Nft the $0—ecial ft�fsloins.,afi of lrfi 0.9" ado, . FArt r".,Thpa. Ant'§PAMX�Wlyggl[AF*i� p9undh Oy.The o - f Iq .40 '40 applicantshall eilso-comPiY.,w!6th6.regulatibns of all other 0 . 0 1 th Iic.'TheWo*ghW -bL. OcO j.Y#f..e puO. Telephone accoirigilihed-16 a mariner that'wlll'ndt:be detrImental-tathe filifiway and thit;-WIIIS�I�uard We 0.61611C. E-rW By - I V.4.am9NW T14ol I bate sighaft0e I POrsuantlo 1AnneSotv.Statut6sF6 Section 161:45, the fd]&Mho Rules have been prorrujigated by the C&hrrdssfter of Transportation (see Pages -2 & 3). Exhibit B, Page I of 3 MINNESOTA RULES 1883 Adopted as of July 31, 1983 UTILITIES EQUIPMENT 8810.3100 DEFINITIONS. Subpart 1. Interstate highways. Under this order 'Interstate highways" shall mean all trunk highways which area part of the interstate system. Subp. 2. Noninterstate highway. Under this order °noninterstate highways' shall mean all trunk highways which are not a part of the Interstate system. Subp. 3. Trunk highways. Under this order 'trunk highways° shall mean all trunk highway Including those which are a part of the Interstate system. Subp. 4. Utility. Under this order °utility' shall mean and Include all privately, publicly, or cooperatively owned communication lines and facilities, any systems, lines, and facilities for the distribution and transmission of electrical energy, oil, gas, water, sewer, steam, and other pipe lines, railways, ditches, flumes, or other structures which under the laws of this state or the ordinance of any village or city may be constructed, placed, or maintained across, along or on trunk highway right-of-way. Dependent upon the meaning Intended in the context; 'utility" shall also mean the utility company, Inclusive of any wholly owned subsidiary. Statutory Authority.. MS ;161.45 6810.3200 PURPOSE AND SCOPE. Subpart 1. Purpose. The purpose of parts 8810.3100 to 8810.3600 is to carry out the mandate of the legislature and to effectuate that mandate as set forth In the Laws of Minnesota 1959, chapter 500, article 11, section 45 (Minnesota Statutes, section 161.45) with reference to the placing, constructing, reconstructing, and maintaining of utilities across, along, upon or under the right-of-way of trunk highways. Subp. 2. Scope. The scope of parts 8810.3100 to 8810.3600 Is confined within the framework of and consistent with the Laws of Minnesota 1959, chapter 500, article 11, section 45. Statutory Authority. MS §161.48 8810.3300 PERMITS. Subpart 1. Construction. Except as otherwise permitted, utility construction and relocation on trunk highway right-of-way shall not be commenced until an application for a permit for construction has been made and such permit granted. The permit for construction sketch shall show the location of the proposed utility with reference to pertinent features such as the right-of-way lines, curb lines. trunk highway center line, etc. A copy of the sketch shall be provided for each copy of such permit Prints of trunk highway right-of-way maps available upon request from the Road Plans Information Office, Department of Transportation Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota $5155. Subp. 2. Maintenance. The utility shall obtain a work permit from the office of the assistant district engineer, maintenance, prlorto performing service and maintenance operations on the Interstate highways and shall also obtain a work permit prior to performing service and maintenance operations on the noninterslate highways when such operations require opening and disturbing the surface of the rightolm way thereof. In all other Instances the utility shall notify the office of the assistant district engineer, maintenance, prior to performing service and maintenance operations on the non Interstate highways which Interfere with the normal flow of traffic thereon. However, the company may perform service and maintenance operations on the trunk highways Including opening and disturbing the surface of the rightol way without a work permit In those Instances where an emergency exists that Is dangerous to the Ilfe or S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Page 2 safety of the public and which requires Immediate repair. The utility upon knowledge of such an emergency shall Immediately notify the State Patrol Division. The utility shall take all necessary and reasonable safety measures to protect the traveling public and shall cooperate fully with the State Patrol Division to that end. The utility in such an event will request a work permit from the office of the assistant district engineer, maintenance, not later than the second working day thereafter when a work permit would ordinarily have been required but for the emergency. Subp. 3. Orders to make Improvements. If at any time the state of Minnesota, acting through Its commissioner of transportation, shall deem it necessary to make any Improvements or changes on all or any part of the right-of-way of trunk highway which affect a utflHy located on trunk highway right-of-way, then and In such event, the owner of the utility shall within 15 days after written notice from the commissioner of transportation or his duly authorized agent, proceed to after, change, vacate, or remove said utility from the trunk highway right-of- -way so as to conform to said bunk highway changes and as directed by the commissioner of transportation. Such work shall be done without any cost whatsoever to the state of Minnesota except as otherwise provided by law or agreement and shall be completed within the date specified in said written notice, which date shall be reasonable under the circumstances. The utility shall assume all liability and save the state of Minnesota harmless from any and all claims of damage of any nature whatsoever occasioned by reason of not having removed said utility within the time specified In said notice. Notwithstanding the provisions of parts 8810.3100 to 8810.3600, the state may reimburse a municipality for the cost of the first relocation of a municipally owned utility located within the limits of a municipal street at the time that the street was taken over by the State as a'trunk highway, when such relocation Is required by construction or reconstruction of the trunk highway. Subp. 4. Along Interstate highways. Utilities along Interstate highways shall be located outside the control -of- access lines except as outlined below. Where the control -of- access lines coincide with the right-of-way lines, the utilities shall generally be located on private property. Where the control-of-access lines and right-of-way lines do not coincide, utilities may In general be located In the area between them. All utilities shall be serviced and maintained without access from the ramps, loops, and through traffic roadbeds. Utilities may be serviced from frontage roads and roads other than another Interstate highway which cross either over or under the Interstate highway. At aerial crossings of an Interstate highway, supporting poles may be located on Interstate highway rlghtoRway if they are a minimum of 30 feet beyond-the shoulders of all through traffic roadbeds; however, In no event shall they be located In a median unless its width is 80 feet or more. Manholes and other points of access to underground crossings may be permitted on the Interstate highway right-of-way only when located outside the shoulders of the through traffic roadbeds, loops, or ramps. The restrictions of this subpart shall not apply to utility lines which service facilities required for operating the Interstate highway. There may be extreme cases where, under strictly controlled conditions, a utility may be permitted Inside the control- oRaccess lines along an Interstate highway. In each case there must be a showing that any other utility location Is extremely difficult and unreasonably costly to the utility consumer, that the installation on the right-of-way of the Interstate highway will not adversely affect the design, construction, ` stability, traffic safety, or operation of the Interstate highway and that the utility can be serviced without access from through traffic roadbeds, loops, or ramps. Subp. 6. Deposit, bond, or undertaking. The commissioner of transportation may require the utility, or Its contractor, to furnish a deposit In the form of a certified check, a surety bond or corporate undertaking In favor of the state of Minnesota, commissioner of transportation, for any expense Incurred by the state in the repairing of damage to any portion of the trunk highway right-of-way caused by work performed under a work permit or a permit for construction, Including any out of the ordinary engineering supervision and Inspection expense provided by the state. In those Instances wherein a deposit Is required, the amount of the deposit shall be specified in the special Exhibit B, Page 2 of 3 provisions of the permit If a check is furnished, -any moneys remaining over and above such expense shall be resumed to the applicant Subp. 6. Liability. Except for the negligent acts of the state, its agents, and employees, the utility shall assume all liability for, and save the state, its agents and employees, harmless from, any and all claims for damages, actions, or causes of action arising out of the work to be done herein and the continuing uses by the utility, Including but not limited to the placing, constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, and using of said utility under this application and permit for construction. Subp. 7 No easement. The work permit or permit for construction as Issued does not In any way Imply an easement on private property. Statutory authority: MS §161.45 6610.3400 STANDARDS FOR WORK CONDUCTED UNDER PERMIT. Subpart 1. Trees, brush, and vegetation. At the time of construction of the utility and at the times of subsequent maintenance, prior approval shall be obtained from the district engineer or his authorized representative for the c rfting and trimming of trees within the trunk highway dght- ofvray. Wherever trees are cut the resulting stumps shall be removed unless otherwise provided In the special provisions of the permit for construction. Any holes caused by stump removal shall be backtgled, the area leveled, and all materials associated therewith disposed of outside the trunk highway right-0f -way. The utility shall advise the district engineer or his authorized representative at least 48 hours in advance of Its Intent to start clearing and grubbing operations so that the proper supervision can be provided. Burning or disking operations and/or the use of chemicals to control or kill trees, brush, and other vegetation is prohibited without prior approval from the assistant district engineer, maintenance. Subp. 2. Waterways. All waterways and Ones of drainage shall remain operative. Subp. 3. Topsoil and sod. Wherever topsoil and sod are disturbed they shall be replaced and maintained satisfactorily until the turf Is established. Subp. 4. Existing utility facilities. The utility facility and installation shall not Interfere with any existing utility facilities on the trunk highway right-of -way. Subp. 5. Warning devices. When necessay, barricades, warning devices and flagmen shall be provided by the utility during all phases of their construction and maintenance operations on the trunk highway right-of -way. Subp, 6. Restoration to original condition. Upon completion of an Installation, the utility shall restore the trunk highway right- of-way to its original condition. The utility shag then notify the office of the assistant district engineer, maintenance, or project engineer of the completion of the work so that inspection can be made to determine its acceptability. Subp. 7. Conformity. The Installations shall be made In conformity with all applicable laws, rules, and codes covering said Installations. All Installations shall be made In conformity with rules of governmental agencies for the protection of the public Statutory Authority: MS §161.45 8810.3500 AERIAL LINES There shall be only a single pole line on the trunk highway right- of-way on either side of the center line thereof, unless otherwise authorized In the special provisions of the permit for . construction. S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Page 3 Longitudinal Installations on noninterstate trunk highways shall normally be located In the outer five feet of the rig"-way. At crossings of the noninterstata trunk highway, poles shall be placed at a minimum of 30 feet from the shoulder lines of the through roadbeds unless right- of-way widths are prohibitive to such location. Unless dearly indicated on the permit for construction sketch, the location of all brace poles, anchors, and anchor poles within the limits of the trunk highway right- of-way shall be approved by the district engineer or his authorized representative prior to actual installation. In those Instances in which a utility is Issued a permit or permits for construction on both sides of the trunk highway right- of-way In a given area such permit Is conditioned upon the utility subsequently providing joint use to other utilities upon reasonable terms mutually agreeable to the utilities. Statutory Authority: INS §161A5 8610.3600 UNDERGROUND LINES. All crossings of the roadbeds of the trunk highway shall be made by boring inside a casing or carrier pipe, or by jacking, unless _this procedure is modified In the special provisions of the permit for construction. The auger shall not lead the casing or carrier pipe by more than one Inch. Open trenching shall be restricted to the area from five feet beyond shoulder to the right- of-way lure except as modified in the special provisions of the permit for conrstruction. When pipes with bells and flanges are installed, the crossings of the roadbeds of trunk highway shall be made by boring Inside a conduit, as provided In the preceding paragraph, of jacking a conduit of sufficient diameter to permit threading the carrier pipe through It All voids caused by jacking or boring shall be filled by pressure grouting. The grout material shall consist of a sand- cement slurry of at least two sacks of cement per cubic yard and a minimum of water to assure satisfactory placement The underground utilities shall be so Installed as virtually to preclude any necassfiy for disturbing the roadbeds to perform maintenance operations. Underground Installations shall be accomplished without damaging or destroying the principal root structure of specimen trees. Statutory Authority: MS §161A5 NOTE: As used In Minnesota Rules, Utilities Equipment, part 8810.3100 Definitions, Subpart 1, Interstate highways shall include all Interstate Highways and Federal Aid Freeways. Exhibit B, Page 3 of 3 NOT USED EXHIBIT C Exhibit C, Page 1 of 1 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT D Mn /DOT Design -Build Project Utility Design Sheet UTILITY DESIGN SHEET Utility Owner. City of Edina SECTION TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO NEGOTIATION MEETING 1. General Location: Utility Owner # Conflict # Public Private 2. Utility Type: ❑ Electric ❑ Gas ❑ Communications ❑ Water ❑ Sanitary ❑ Cable TV ❑ Other: 3. Location By: ❑ Utility Plat Maps ❑ Field Located & Surveyed: ❑ Yes ❑ No Pothole:[] Yes ❑ No If Pothole, # From: ❑ Mn /DOT Work or ❑ DBC Work SUE contractor used: Station: to Station: Dist. From CL: Rt. / Lt. 4. Utility Size & Materials: 5. Encased: ❑ No ❑ Yes, If So; Size & Material: This Section Completed By DBC Rep.: Date: SECTION TO BE COMPLETED AT NEGOTIATION MEETING 1. DBC Recommends Utility be: ❑ Left Alone ❑ Modified ❑ Removed ❑ Relocated ❑ Upgraded ❑ Abandoned Conflict With: 2. This Utility May Be Modified /Relocated To: Station: to Station: Dist. from CL: Rt. /Lt.. 3: Utility In: ❑ Mn/DOT RNV ❑ Other Public RNV ❑ Easement (attach copy) El Not in RNV 4. Who Is To Do the Design? ❑ Utility Owner (UO) ❑ Design -Build Contractor (DBC) 5. Who Is To Do Construction/Relocation? ❑ Utility Owner (UO) ❑ Design -Build Contractor (DBC) 6. UO To Perform Inspection? ❑ No . ❑ Yes, If So, Conditions: 7. Number of Days Required For Prior Notification by DBC For Construction Relocation by UO: 8. Number of Days Required to Complete Design: Days; Construction: 9. Any Construction Details Unique to This Location? ❑ No ❑ Yes, Describe: Days Days 10. Utility Can Only Be Disconnected For Days/Hours 11. Other Proposed Action: 12. Detailed Plan Sheet Attached This Section Completed By: Mn /DOT UO : DBC Exhibit D, Page 1 of 1 Date: S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT E(1) Design Work Order For Master Utility Agreement (MUA) Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 UDS Number Work Order Number Date: Work Order Revision Number Date: Location /Description of Work The UDS (Attachment A) describes the location of the Utility Work for this Work Order. General description of the Utility Work for this Work Order: Allocation of Responsibility for Utility Work For Design: by Contractor: ; by Utility Owner: Other (explain): Exhibit E(1), Page 1 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 For Design: Mn /DOT pays $ to Utility Owner /Contractor Utility Owner pays $ to Mn /DOT /Contractor ❑ Lump Sum $ OR ❑ Actual Cost not to exceed $ For Design: Start Date: Completion Date (CD): Review:. No more than days after the CD MUA Encumbrance: $ Mn /DOT Costs incurred under: MUA $ and /or DB Contract $ Total Costs to Date: MUA $ and /or DB Contract $ Remaining MUA Balance: $ Exhibit E(1), Page 2 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 THIS WORK ORDER (Work Order) is entered into among Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor to implement, in part, a Master Utility Agreement (MUA) identified as Mn /DOT Agreement Number 96263, and its amendments. The Work Order includes the information on the face page(s) to which it is attached. DESCRIPTION OF THE UTILITY WORK MUA: This Work Order authorizes the Utility Work described herein. All .MUA provisions and all attachments referenced in this Work Order are incorporated herein by this reference. All Utility Work must be performed pursuant to the MUA; however, in the event of an inconsistency, this Work. Order will prevail. Scope: The party will perfgrm the design work specified on the face page of this Work Order. Schedule: The party responsible for performing the design work must complete that design work according to the schedule on the face page of this Work Order. PERFORMANCE OF THE UTILITY DESIGN WORK The design that the Utility Owner or the Contractor furnishes pursuant to this Work Order must substantially conform to the Preliminary Plan in Attachment B and the standards and specifications in Attachment C. This design work must also be� consistent and compatible with the relevant Project plans. All plans for the Utility Work are subject to review and Approval by the Utility Owner and the Contractor according to the time frames and procedures described in the MUA or modified by the Work Order. LIABILITY FOR UTILITY WORK Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner will be responsible for the Utility Relocation costs on the face page of this Work Order that are necessary due to the Project. The Utility Owner will be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of any Betterments, as described below. COST ESTIMATE The party responsible for performing the design of the Utility Work under this Work Order must prepare a cost estimate for that work on a lump sum or actual cost basis. That estimate will be attached to this Work Order. PRICE OF UTILITY WORK Utility Owner's Facility Located on Interstate Highway (Mn /DOT pays the Utility Owner): The price of the Utility Work (excluding Betterments) was included in the Contractor's proposal price and the DB Contract price. /or/ The parties have agreed to a lump sum amount of $ for the Utility Work. /or/ Based on the attached cost estimate(s), the parties have agreed that the estimate for the actual cost is $ for the Utility Work. The actual cost of the Utility•Work will not exceed this amount. Exhibit E(1), Page 3 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Utility Owner with a First Move (MNDOT pays the Utility Owner): The price of the Utility Work (excluding Betterments) was included in the Contractor's proposal price and the DB Contract price. /or/ The parties have agreed to a lump sum amount of $ for the Utility Work. /or/ Based on the attached cost estimate(s), the parties have agreed that the estimate for the actual cost is $ for the Utility Work. The actual cost of the Utility Work will not exceed this amount. BILLING AND PAYMENT Mn/DOT's Responsibility for Payment: Billing and payment for Utility Work that the Contractor performs and the Utility Owner inspects must follow the procedure in the DB Contract. Billing and payment for Utility Work that the Utility Owner performs must follow the terms of the MUA. BETTERMENT, RETIREMENT VALUE, SALVAGE The Utility Work includes Betterment to the Utility Owner's Facilities by reason of with an estimated cost of $ /or/ The Utility Work does not include any Betterment. /or/ Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner have not yet determined if the Utility Work will include any Betterment, or have not yet determined the amount attributable to Betterment. Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner will revise this Work Order as necessary when a decision is made. and The Utility Owner will credit Mn /DOT for the actual cost of any Betterment Work and any salvage value or retirement value from the Facilities. CONTRACTOR -NOTED REQUIREMENTS Exhibit E(1), Page 4 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EFFECTIVE DATE This Work Order will be effective on the date Mn /DOT fills in on the face page of this Work Order. Exhibit E(1), Page 5 of 6 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor have executed this Work Order as of the date set forth on the face page of this Work Order. Utility Owner: By: Date: Print Name: Title: Contractor: By: Date: Print Name: Title: Mn/DOT: By: Date: Print Name: Title: Department of Administration: By: Date: Print Name: Title: State Encumbrance Verification Not applicable; funds encumbered under the MUA. Exhibit E(1), Page 6 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT E(2) Construction Work Order For Master Utility Agreement (MUA) Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 UDS Number Work Order Number Date: Work Order Revision Number Date: Location /Description of Work The UDS (Attachment A) describes the location of the Utility Work for this Work Order. General description of the Utility Work for this Work Order: Allocation of Responsibility for Utility Work For Construction: by Contractor: ; by Utility Owner: Other (explain): Exhibit E(2), Page 1 of.6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 For Construction: Mn /DOT pays $ to Utility Owner /Contractor Utility Owner pays $ to Mn /DOT /Contractor For Inspection: Mn /DOT pays $ to Utility Owner /Contractor Utility Owner pays $ to Mn /DOT /Contractor For Replacement Easements: Mn /DOT pays $ to Utility Owner /Contractor Utility Owner pays $ to Mn /DOT /Contractor ❑ Lump Sum $ OR ❑ Actual Cost not to exceed $ For Construction: Start Date: Completion Date (CD): Review: No more than days after the CD MUA Encumbrance: $ Mn /DOT Costs incurred under: MUA $ and /or DB Contract $ Total Costs to Date: MUA $ and /or DB Contract $ Remaining MUA Balance: $ Exhibit E(2), Page 2 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (TA 169) Agreement Number 96263 THIS WORK ORDER (Work Order) is entered into among Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor to implement, in part, a Master Utility Agreement (MUA) identified as Mn /DOT Agreement Number 96263, and its amendments. The Work Order includes the information on the face page(s) to which it is attached. DESCRIPTION OF THE UTILITY WORK MUA: This Work Order authorizes the Utility Work described herein. All MUA provisions and all attachments referenced in this Work Order are incorporated herein by this reference. All Utility Work must be performed pursuant to the MUA; however, in the event of an inconsistency, this Work Order will prevail. Scope: The party will perform the construction work specified on the face page of this Work Order. Schedule: The party responsible for performing the construction work must only commence that work after the other party Approves the Final Design. The party responsible for performing the construction work must complete that construction work according to the schedule on the face page of this Work Order. PERFORMANCE OF THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION WORK The construction work that the Utility Owner or Contractor performs pursuant to this Work Order must substantially conform to the final Approved design plan. Any deviations from the final Approved design plan must be consistent with the MUA. Construction and Inspection of the Utility Work performed by either the Utility Owner or Contractor will be pursuant to Sections XII. and XIII. of the MUA. The party responsible for performing the construction work pursuant to this Work Order must notify Mn /DOT at least 48 hours before beginning that work. This notification will allow Mn /DOT to perform its construction oversight responsibilities pursuant to the MUA. The Mn /DOT contact for this project is Michael Beer. He can be reached by phone at 651/274 -7663 or by email at Michael. Beer @state.mn.us. The backup Mn /DOT contact is James Zigman. He can be reached by phone at 651/366 -4607 or by email at James.Zigman @state.mn.us. LIABILITY FOR UTILITY WORK Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner will be responsible for the Utility Relocation costs on the face page of this Work Order that are necessary'due to the Project. The Utility Owner will be _ responsible for 100 percent of the cost of any Betterments, as described below. COST ESTIMATE The party responsible for performing the construction of the Utility Work under this Work Order must prepare a cost estimate for that work on a lump sum or actual cost basis. That estimate will be' attached to this Work Order. Exhibit E(2), Page 3 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 PRICE OF UTILITY WORK Utility Owner's Facility Located on Interstate Highway (Mn /DOT pays the Utility Owner): The price of the Utility Work (excluding Betterments) was included in the Contractor's proposal price and the DB Contract price. /or/ The parties have agreed to a lump sum amount of $ for the Utility Work. /or/ Based on the attached cost estimate(s), the parties have agreed that the estimate for the actual cost is $ for the Utility Work. The actual cost of the Utility Work will not exceed this amount. Utility Owner with a First Move (Mn/DOT pays the Utility Owner): The price of the Utility Work (excluding Betterments) was included.in the Contractor's proposal price and the DB Contract price. /or/ The parties have agreed to a lump sum amount of $ for the Utility Work. /or/ Based on the attached cost estimate(s), the parties have agreed that the estimate for the actual cost is $ for the Utility Work. The actual cost of the Utility Work will not exceed this amount. BILLING AND PAYMENT MnIDOT's Responsibility for Payment:. Billing and payment for Utility Work that the Contractor performs and the Utility Owner inspects must follow the procedure in the DB Contract. Billing and payment for Utility Work that the Utility Owner performs must follow the terms of the MUA. BETTERMENT, RETIREMENT VALUE, SALVAGE The Utility Work includes Betterment to the Utility Owner's Facilities by reason of with an estimated cost of $ /or/ The Utility Work does not include any Betterment. /or/ Mn/DOT and the Utility Owner have not yet determined if the Utility Work will include any Betterment, or have not yet determined the amount attributable to Betterment. Mn /DOT and the Utility Owner will revise this Work Order as necessary when a decision is made. and The Utility Owner will credit Mn /DOT for the actual cost of any Betterment Work and any salvage value or retirement value from the Facilities. CONTRACTOR -NOTED REQUIREMENTS Exhibit E(2), Page 4 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EFFECTIVE DATE This Work Order will be effective on the date Mn /DOT fills in on the face page of this Work Order. Exhibit E(2), Page 5 of 6 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor have executed this Work Order as of the date set forth on the face page of this Work Order. Utility Owner: By: Date: Print Name: Title: Contractor: By: Date: Print Name: Title: Mn/DOT: By: Date: Print Name: Title: Department of Administration: By: Date: Print Name: Title: State Encumbrance Verification Not applicable; funds encumbered under the MUA. Exhibit E(2), Page 6 of 6 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT F(1) Utility Owner's Design Approval Letter THIS DESIGN APPROVAL LETTER (Letter) is for the City of Edina's (Utility Owner's) execution. By executing this Letter, the Utility Owner indicates its Approval of the Utility Design Work that the Contractor performed. The table below specifically describes the Utility Design Work to be Approved. The Contractor performed this Utility Design Work as part of MUA Agreement Number 96263 which was entered into among Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor. Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 Work Order Number Work Order Revision Number UDS Number Date: Date: UTILITY OWNER'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE By signing below, the Utility Owners authorized Representative indicates that the Contractor performed the Utility Design Work according to all applicable MUA standards and Work Order requirements. The Utility Owner hereby Approves the Contractors completed Utility Design Work. Utility Owner: Signature: Date: If the Utility Owner will be performing the Construction Utility Work, . then the Contractor will issue a notice to proceed to the Utility Owner for that Construction Utility Work once the Utility Owner signs this letter. Exhibit F(1), Page 1 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 If the Utility Owner will not sign this letter, it must state its basis for not approving the Utility Design Work: cc: Mn /DOT Contractor Exhibit F(1), Page 2 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT F(2) Contractor's Design Approval Letter THIS DESIGN APPROVAL LETTER (Letter) is for the Contractor's execution. By executing this Letter, the Contractor: indicates its Approval of the Utility Design Work that the City of Edina (Utility Owner) performed. The table below specifically describes the Utility Design Work to be Approved. The Contractor performed this Utility Design Work as part of MUA Agreement Number 96263 which was entered into among Mn/DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor. Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 Work Order Number UDS Number Date: Work Order Revision Number Date: CONTRACTOR'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE By signing below, the Contractor's authorized Representative indicates that the Utility Owner performed the Utility Design Work according to all applicable MUA standards and Work Order requirements. The Contractor hereby Approves the Utility Owner's completed Utility Design Work. Contractor: Signature: Date: If the Utility Owner will be performing the Construction Utility Work, then the Contractor will issue a notice to proceed to the Utility Owner for that Construction Utility Work once it signs this letter. Exhibit F(2), Page 1 of 2 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 If the Contractor will not sign this letter, it must state its basis for not approving the Utility Design Work: cc: Mn /DOT Utility Owner Exhibit F(2), Page 2 of 2 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT G(1) Utility Owner's Construction Inspection Acceptance Letter THIS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE LETTER (Letter) is for the City of Edina's (Utility Owner's) execution. By executing this Letter, the Utility Owner indicates its Acceptance of the Utility Construction Work that the Contractor performed. The table below specifically describes the Utility Construction Work to be Accepted. The Contractor performed this Utility Construction Work as part of MUA Agreement Number 96263, which was entered into among Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor. Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 Work Order Number Work Order Revision Number UDS Number Date: Date: UTILITY OWNER'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE By signing below, the Utility Owner's authorized Representative indicates that the Contractor appears to have performed the Utility Construction Work according to all applicable MUA standards and Work Order requirements. The Utility Owner hereby Accepts the Contractor's completed Utility Construction Work. Utility Owner: Signature: Date: Exhibit G(1), Page 1 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 If the Utility Owner will not sign this letter, it must state its basis for not approving the Utility Construction Work: cc: Mn /DOT Contractor Exhibit G(1), Page 2 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT G(2) Contractor's Construction Inspection Approval Letter THIS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION APPROVAL LETTER (Letter) is for the Contractor's execution. By executing this Letter, the Contractor indicates its Approval of the Utility Construction Work that the Utility Owner performed. The table below specifically describes the Utility Construction Work to be Approved. The Utility Owner performed this Utility Construction Work as part of MUA Agreement Number 96263, which was entered into among Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor. Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 UDS Number Work Order Number Date: Work Order Revision Number Date: CONTRACTOR'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE By signing below, the Contractor's authorized Representative indicates that the Utility Owner performed the Utility Construction Work according to all applicable MUA standards and Work Order requirements. The Contractor hereby Approves the Utility Owner's completed Utility Construction Work. Contractor: Signature: Date: Exhibit G(2), Page 1 of 2 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 If the Contractor will not sign this letter, it must state its basis for -not approving the Utility Construction Work: cc: Mn /DOT Utility Owner Exhibit G(2), Page 2 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT G(3) Utility Owner's Construction Inspection Approval Letter THIS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION APPROVAL LETTER (Letter) is for the City of Edina's (Utility Owner's) execution. By executing this Letter, the Utility Owner indicates its Approval of the Utility Construction Work that the Contractor performed. The table below specifically describes the Utility Construction Work to be Approved. The Contractor performed this Utility Construction Work as part of MUA Agreement Number 96263, which was entered into among Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor. Utility Owner: City of Edina MUA Agreement Number 96263 Work Order Number UDS Number Date: Work Order Revision Number Date: UTILITY OWNER'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE By signing below, the Utility Owner's authorized Representative indicates that the Contractor performed the Utility Construction Work according to all applicable MUA standards and Work Order requirements. The Utility Owner hereby Approves the Contractor's completed Utility Construction Work. Utility Owner: Signature: Date: Exhibit G(3), Page 1 of 2 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 If the Utility Owner will not sign this letter, it must state its basis for not approving the Utility Construction Work: cc: Mn /DOT Contractor Exhibit G(3), Page 2 of 2 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT H MUA Definitions The following definitions apply to terms used in the MUA. Accept: To formally and conditionally determine, in writing, that a particular matter appears to conform to the requirements of the MUA. Acceptance: The written document that states that a party has accepted a specific matter. .Approval: The written documentation that states that a party has approved a specific matter. Approve: To formally and conditionally determine, in writing, that a particular matter or item is good or satisfactory for the Project. This determination may be based on requirements beyond those in the MUA and may reflect specific preferences. Applicable Laws: All applicable federal and State laws, codes, ordinances, rules, regulations, judgments, decrees, directives, guidelines, policy requirements,.and orders of any Governmental Person having jurisdiction over the Project or.the Site, the practices involved in the Project or the Site, or any work or Utility Work a Utility Owner performs. Betterment: Any upgrade of a Utility Facility (e.g., increase in capacity) that is not attributable to the Project construction, and'that the Utility Owner elects to perform for its sole benefit. Such an upgrade does not include a technological improvement if its cost is equal to or less than the cost of a "like for liken replacement or relocation. Using new materials in order to comply with current standards when performing Utility Work is not considered a betterment. 4 Calendar Day(s): Every day shown on the calendar, beginning and ending at midnight. Claim: A separate demand by a Contractor or Utility Owner for either a time extension that Mn/DOT disputes, or a payment for damages arising from work that the Contractor or the Utility Owner performed under the Contract or MUA that Mn/DOT disputes. Upon its resolution, including a resolution by delivery of a Change Order or Contract amendment that all parties have signed, the claim will cease to be a Claim. . Construction Easement: A non - permanent easement that the Contractor determines is desirable or necessary to perform the construction or Utility Work. Contract: The Design -Build Contract between Mn/DOT and the Contractor for the Design -Build Project. Contractor: The Design -Build Contractor engaged by Mn/DOT under the Contract to perform work, render services, and /or provide materials, equipment, or other property with respect to the design and construction of the Project. DB Contract: See Contract DB Contractor: See Contractor Exhibit H, Page 1 of 4 . S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Dispute: A disagreement between the Utility Owner and the Contractor, and /or the Utility Owner and Mn /DOT that arises under the MUA. Facilities /Facility: A privately, publicly, or cooperatively owned line, system, and or other utility item that produces, transmits, or distributes communications, power, cable television, electricity, light, heat, gas, oil, crude products, water, steam, waste, storm water not connected with highway drainage, signal systems, and other products or services that serve the public, and /or a privately owned irrigation system. Any necessary appurtenances to each facility are considered part of it. This term excludes storm water facilities used for drainage of the roadway. Final Acceptance: The acceptance of the Utility Work in the Construction Inspection Approval Letter. Final Design: The final design for all or a portion of the Utility Work. Force Account: The basis of payment set forth in the MNDOT Standard Specifications for Construction, Section .1904 (unmodified by the Contract). Force Majeure: An event that is beyond Mn /DOT's, the Contractor's, or the Utility Owner's control, that due diligence and use of reasonable efforts could not have avoided or prevented, that materially and adversely affects a party's ability to meet its obligations under the Contract. It does not include events due to a party's acts or omissions. This term does not include normal weather, Differing Site Conditions, Mn/DOT- directed changes, or any other matter for which the Contract Documents specify how liability or risk will be allocated between the parties, regardless of whether that matter is beyond a party's control. Governmental Person: I Any federal, State, local, or foreign government; political subdivision; Exhibit H, Page 2 of 4 governmental, quasi - governmental, judicial, public, or statutory instrumentality; administrative agency, authority, body, or entity. The term includes other. State and agencies and subdivisions in addition to Mn/DOT. In- Place /Out =of- Service Work: The work necessary for a Utility Owner to decommission a Facility and its appurtenances that will not be removed. The Facility must be taken out of use using proper Utility Owner and /or industry procedures (e.g., flushing, capping, filling with grout or sand) or other procedures that Mn/DOT approves. Inspection: The act of viewing or looking carefully at the Utility Work to verify whether it complies with the Technical Criteria and quality requirements in the MUA. Interfere: To perform any action or inaction that interrupts, delays, or damages the Project work. Incidental Utility Work: All work associated with the protection of existing Utility Facilities and In- Place /Out -of- Service Work that the Contractor deems necessary to accommodate the Project. Master Utility Agreement: An agreement among Mn /DOT, the Contractor, and a Utility Owner that provides a general framework for addressing Utility conflicts associated with the Project. Exhibit H, Page 2 of 4 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Mn/DOT: Minnesota Department of Transportation MUA: See Master Utility Agreement Owner: See Utility Owner Private Utility: A Utility Facility that is owned by a Private Utility Owner. Private Utility Owner: Any owner or operator of a Utility that is not a governmental agency. Project; The Project Work under State Project Number 2776-03 in the Trunk Highway Numbers 169 & 494 right of way, as defined in Book1 of the Design -Build Contract. Project Work: All duties and services that the Contractor must provide pursuant to the Design -Build Contract, including the administrative, design, engineering, quality control, quality assurance, Utility Work, procurement, legal, professional, manufacturing, supply, installation, construction, supervision, management, testing, verification, labor, materials, Site: equipment, documentation, and all other efforts necessary or appropriate to achieve Mn/DOT's Final Acceptance, except for efforts that the State: Design -Build Contract or MUA specify others will perform. In certain cases, the term is also used to mean the products of the work performed under the Project. Protection of Existing Utilities: Any activity undertaken to avoid damaging a Facility that does not involve removing or relocating that Facility, including staking its location, avoiding it, installing steel plating or concrete slabs, encasing it in concrete, de- energizing power lines, and installing physical barriers (i.e., temporarily lifting power lines without cutting them is Protection of Existing Utilities, whereas temporarily moving power lines to another location after cutting them is a temporary Utility Relocation. Public Utility: A Utility Facility that is owned by a Public Utility Owner. Public Utility Owner: A municipality, county, or other political subdivision in the State of Minnesota that owns and operates a Utility Facility. Representative: An authorized individual who is responsible for administrative supervision of the Utility Work for the Project. Right of Way: The real property (including all estates and interests in real property) that is necessary to construct, operate, and maintain the highway. This term specifically excludes utility easements and Construction Easements. Service Line: A Utility Facility that connects an individual service location (e.g., a single family residence or an industrial warehouse) to another Utility Facility that connects one or more lines to a larger system. This term also includes any Utility Facility on public or private property that services structures located on that property. Site: The parcels of right of way and other areas in the vicinity of the Project that the Contractor will use to perform construction. State: (1) The State of Minnesota acting through its elected officials and their authorized representatives; or (2) The State of Minnesota in the geographic sense.. Exhibit H, Page 3 of 4 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 Technical Criteria: The criteria that the MUA establishes the minimum acceptable standards of quality, materials, and performance of the Utility Work. These criteria will be the basis for reviews, Final Acceptance, and Final Approval. UDS: See Utility Design Sheet UIS: See Utility Information Sheet Utility:. The owner or operator of a utility facility, or the facility or system itself. Utility Design Sheet: A form the Contractor prepares to document the existing Utility Facility Utility Tracking Report: conditions and the final relocation recommendation to mitigate any Utility Work: potential conflict. After Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor sign the form, the Contractor will attach it to the respective Work Order. Utility Owner: The public or private owner or operator of a Utility Facility. Utility Permit: Any appropriate approval, exemption, filing, license, permit, registration, or governmental approval that a Governmental Person or Utility Owner requires for a Utility Relocation. Utility Relocation: The removal, relocation, and /or protection of an existing Utility Facility Working Day(s): that is necessary for the Project. Relocation includes temporary service work. Utility Relocation Plans: The design plans the Contractor or the Utility Owner prepares to relocate Exhibit H, Page 4 of 4 a Facility for the Project. Utility Removal Work: Work necessary to remove in -place Utility Facilities to accommodate the Project. Utility Tracking Report: A Mn /DOT report summarizing Utility conflicts inside the Project. Utility Work: All work associated with utility relocations required by a MUA and /or a Work Order issued under it. The Utility Owner, the Contractor, or a subcontractor may perform this work. Work Order: An ordering agreement that authorizes a specific utility relocation and provides information and terms for that relocation. Mn /DOT, the Utility Owner, and the Contractor must enter into and execute a Work Order pursuant to a MUA. Working Day(s): Any Calendar Day, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. Exhibit H, Page 4 of 4 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT I Mn /DOT Notice and Order S.P. 2776 -03 (TH. 169) Agreement Number 96263 CITY OF EDINA NOTICE AND ORDER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 161.45 and Minnesota Rules, part 8810.3300, subpart 3, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) hereby issues this Notice and Order to the City of Edina (Utility Owner), which, according to Mn /DOT's records, has certain facilities in the right of way of Trunk Highway Numbers 169 and 494. Mn /DOT will be constructing a Design -Build project on, along, and adjacent to the Interchange of Trunk Highway Numbers 169 and 494 in the Cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. This project is currently scheduled to be let on June 4, 2010. This project will affect Utility Owner's facilities.on the right of way of Trunk Highway Numbers 169 and 494 that are within the construction limits of this project. This Notice and Order requires Utility Owner to immediately begin to relocate or adjust its affected utility facilities pursuant to Minnesota Rules, part 8810.3300, subpart 3 and Agreement Number 96263. Utility Owner must follow the steps below to comply with this Notice and Order. UTILITY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES Prior to the date set to commence the project or a later date determined by Mn /DOT, Utility Owner must: • Contact Mn /DOT's Design -Build Coordinator no more than 15 days after receiving this Notice and Order to obtain more information about the design -build contract and to provide the name, address,'telephone number, fax number, and email address of the person who will be in charge of the relocation and adjustment work in the field; • Contact the Design -Build Contractor (DBC) to obtain specific contract time provisions and project construction staging; • Coordinate all relocation and adjustment work with the DBC; • Begin procuring the materials required to relocate or adjust Utility Owner's facilities; • Obtain an approved Utility Permit prior to starting any fieldwork related to the relocation or adjustment of Utility Owner's facilities on trunk highway right of way by submitting a completed Long Form Application for Utility Permit, Form 2525, including two copies of the "proposed" sketches to the Utilities Engineer; • Obtain the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Permit to perform relocation or adjustment work that will be accomplished before the DBC begins construction; • Perform Utility Owner's work according to the NPDES Permit issued for this project; • Restore drainage and slopes to their original conditions and the DBC's satisfaction; • Restore all pollution control measures and devices that Utility Owner's relocation or adjustment operations disturbed; • Relocate and adjust the facilities according to Mn /DOT's Policy for Accommodation of Utilities on Highway Right of Way; • Obtain the DBC's written authorization to work on trunk highway right of way before beginning the relocation and adjustment work; and • Complete the relocation or adjustment of the facilities on this project by a date the Design -Build Coordinator specifies in writing, unless he or she authorizes a different date in writing. Note that the completion date or dates for the relocation and adjustment of the facilities established through this Notice and Order take precedence and continue Exhibit I, Page 1 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 to control the Utility Owner's obligation in spite of any completion date or dates established in any Utility Permit. CONSEQUENCES OF NONCOMPLIANCE If Utility Owner fails to comply with this Notice and Order, Utility Owner will assume all liability and save the State of Minnesota harmless from any and all claims of damage of any nature that result from that noncompliance. Also, Mn /DOT reserves the right to: • Take any action necessary to compel Utility Owner to comply with this Notice and Order; and • Withhold issuance of future utility permits requested for Utility Owner's benefit until Utility Owner has fulfilled the requirements of this Notice and Order. Date: Thomas K. Sorel Commissioner of Transportation By: Marilyn Remer, P.E. Utilities Engineer Exhibit I, Page 2 of 2 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT J Utility Owner's Reimbursement Invoice Form S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Utility Owner: City of Edina Address: 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Project Location: TH 169 and TH 494 Interchange in the Cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina, Hennepin Count MUA Agreement Number 96263 MUA Date: Work Order Number Work Order Date: Invoice Number Invoice Date: Estimated percentage of work completed under this Work Order: % Lump Sum Invoice Actual Cost Invoice Lump sum amount: Estimated cost not to exceed: $ Previously billed: Previously billed: Billed this invoice: Billed this invoice: Amount remaining: Amount Remaining: Comments: Comments I, the undersigned, certify that: 1) All bills that support this Irivoice /Payment Request are attached; and 2) The total current payment request above complies with all applicable MUA and Work Order terms: Signature Title Date * ** Fully executed Exhibit F must be attached to Design Final Billing * ** Fully executed Exhibit G must be attached to Construction Final Billing Exhibit J, Page 1 of 1 NOT USED EXHIBIT K Exhibit K, Page 1 of 1 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT L City of Edina Resolution IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Edina is authorized to enter into the Master Utility Agreement (MUA), Mn /DOT Agreement Number 96263, applicable to the State Project Number 2776 -03 on Trunk Highway Number 169, with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To cooperate with the Contractor to coordinate all utility relocation issues for State Project Number 2776 -03 on Trunk Highway Number 169. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the following individuals are certified to execute the MUA and any amendments to it: (Title) (Title) CERTIFICATION I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution that the Council of the City of Edina adopted at an authorized meeting held on the day of , 2010, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2010 Notary Public My Commission Expires (Signature) (Type or Print Name) (Title) Exhibit L, Page 1 of 1 S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT M City of Edina Resolution IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Mn /DOT Agreement Number 96263 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To provide payment by the to the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the Betterment the City has requested. This Betterment work consists of along and adjacent to Trunk Highway Number 169 from _ to IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City agrees [to provide the total negotiated lump sum cost of the Betterment work to Mn /DOT no more than 30 calendar days after certifying this Resolution, and that] [to provide the total estimated cost of the Betterment work to Mn /DOT no more than 30 calendar days after certifying this resolution. The City also agrees to pay Mn /DOT any actual costs that exceed the estimate, and that] the following individuals are certified to execute the Agreement and any amendments to it. Title Title CERTIFICATION I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution that the Council of the City of Edina adopted at an authorized meeting held on the day of , 2010, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , Notary Public My Commission Expires 4A 2010 (Signature) (Type or Print Name) (Title) Exhibit M, Page 1 of 1 S.P. 2776-03 (T.H. 169) Agreement Number 96263 EXHIBIT N DB Contract Section 19 19 PARTNERING, CLAIMS FOR ADJUSTMENT AND DISPUTES 19.1 Partnering Although Partnering through the use of a third party facilitator is not required, the Contractor, Mn /DOT and stakeholders shall enter into a procedure for Partnering as identified within this Section 19. Within 7 Days after NTP 1, the Contractor shall arrange a Partnering meeting between the Contractor, Mn /DOT and key stakeholders. This meeting will establish: a. Communication procedures; b. A dispute resolution process, including the development of a dispute resolution ladder; and c. A partnering checklist to be reviewed at project meetings (if applicable). The checklist should contain items such as Quality, Communication,_ Issue Resolution, Team and Work Relationships, and Schedule. The partnering process will continue as part of the regularly scheduled project meetings or at events that require additional partnering sessions. These meetings should include primarily project level personnel with frequent visits from both Department and Contractor middle management. The meetings should review the partnering checklist and identify actions that need to be escalated up the dispute resolution ladder. All costs associated with partnering shall be incidental., If the Contractor and Mn/DOT determine that a third party facilitator would enhance the Partnering process, the Contractor shall make all arrangements to hire a Partnering facilitator and provide a suitable meeting location for the workshops. The length of time devoted to the workshop, along with the content for the workshop, will be determined by a cooperative effort between the Contractor and Mn /DOT. Mn /DOT and the Contractor will mutually select the Partnering facilitator. All costs associated with the Partnering workshops using a Partnering facilitator will be shared equally between Mn /DOT and the Contractor. No additional allowance will be provided to the Contractor for the cost associated with paying these bills and submitting the bills to Mn /DOT for later partial reimbursement. 19.2 Disputes This Section 19 shall not preclude the Contractor from notifying Mn /DOT in writing, of issues or potential issues as those issues come up. 19.3 Costs See Section 19.1. 19.4 Claims for Compensation Adjustment and Disputes If issue resolution efforts through Partnering are not successful, disputes shall be resolved through DBS -1517 and Standard Specification 1517. Exhibit N, Page 1 of 1 o, to RE PO RPRECO M M E N DATIO N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. L. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Resolution 2010 -97 Approving Cooperative Construction Agreement with MNDOT for TH16911494 Interchange Project. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution 2010 -96 Approving attached Cooperative Construction Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) has coordinated the efforts of the design build process for reconstructing the TH169/1494 Interchange Project. The review of the three finalists has occurred along with the opening of the bids. MNDOT now needs the three cities of . Edina, Eden Prairie and Bloomington to execute two agreements (Master Utility Agreement and Cooperative Construction Agreement) in order for MNDOT to award the project. Construction is expected to start the spring of 2011. The local cost share will be determined by the actual awarded bid. The estimated local cost share per the agreement is $1,537,579.56; the newly estimated cost share based on the apparent winning design -build team bid is $1,329,351.96. Funding for local cost shares can be through the City's appropriation of Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds or other local funds; we anticipate using our MSA funds for this project. Staff and our City Attorney have reviewed this agreement. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2010 -97 Approving Cooperative Construction Agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project • Cooperative Construction Agreement g:\ engineering\ infrastructure \streets \mndot \169 494 interchange \2010 issue \resolution \item iv. I. res 2010 -97 approving cooperative construction agreement with mndot for th 169 i494 interchange project.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-97 APPROVING COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR TH169/1494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT S.P. 2776 -03 City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has cooperatively worked with the Department of Transportation to prepare a Cooperative Construction Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.164, the City of Edina previously held in 2006 a public hearing to consider layout approval and subsequent Municipal Consent of said improvements; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent was granted for the 1- 494/TH -169 project on December 19, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City of Edina is authorized to enter into the Cooperative Construction Agreement Number 96483, applicable to the State Project Number 2776 -03 on Trunk Highway Number 169, with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To provide payment by the City of Edina to the State of Minnesota the City's share of costs of the bridge, retaining wall, roundabout, and roadway construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 169 from Anderson Lake Parkway to Valley View Road and upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 1 -494 from Prairie Center Drive to West Bush Lake Road under State Project No. 2776 -03 (TH 169 =005); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager is authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. Adopted this 5th day of October, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -97 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk as for tadopted by the Edina City certify that the attached and foregoing Resolute Y Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk PRE - LETTING STATE OF MINNESOTA Mn /DOT SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT NO. SECTION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 96483 -R S.P. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169 =005) S.P. 2776- 27A16A, 27A17A, 2718A, S.A.P. 107- 010 -012 S.A.P. 181 - 010 -017 S.A.P. 181 -127 -001 S.A.P. 120 - 010 -012 S.A.P. 120- 176 -002 Fed. Proj. NH 0169 (315) Bridge No.s 27R25, 27R26, 27R27, 27R28, 27R29, 27V90, 27V911 27V92, 27V93, 27V94, 27V95, 27V96, 27V97 The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, and The City of Edina Re: City lump-sum bid -based payment (percent'of contract bid) for bridge, retaining wall, roundabout, roadway, and storm water treatment construction and Right -of -Way payment by the State at the T.H. 169/2 -494 interchange AMOUNT ENCUMBERED (None) ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE $1,537,579.56 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Edina, Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City". 1 96483 WHEREAS, the7State is about to perform interchange, roundabout, retaining wall, signal, storm water treatment, and sidewalk construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 169 from Anderson Lake Parkway to Valley View Road and upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No.-'I-494 from Prairie Center Drive to West Bush Lake Road in accordance with State plans, specifications and special provisions designated as State Project No. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169 =005) and in the records of the Federal Highway Administration as Minnesota Project NH 0169 (315); and WHEREAS, City cost participation is required on State Project No. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169 =005) for bridge, retaining wall, roundabout, roadway, and storm water treatment construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to the interchange of Trunk Highway No. 169 and No. I -494 and on State Aid Projects No. 120 -010 -012 and No. 120 - 176 -002 within the corporate City limits; and WHEREAS, in connection with the State contract, the State acquired Parcel No. 506 located along .West 78th Street and east of Trunk Highway No. 169; and WHEREAS, the City agrees to participate in the cost of Parcel No. 506 in a lump sum amount equal to $189,600.00; and WHEREAS, the City has expressed its willingness to participate in the costs of the bridge, retaining wall, roundabout, roadway, and storm water treatment construction and associated construction engineering in a lump sum amount as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS the design and construction requirements for Utility work to be performed for the City of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Edina 2 96483 under State Project No. 2776 -03 will be covered under separate Utility Agreements No. 96256, No. 96262, and No. 96263 respectively; and WHEREAS, in connection with the State contract, certain roadway, roundabout, bridge, bridge walk, retaining wall, and signal construction to be performed under State Project No. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169 =005) will be covered under Agreement No. 96482 between the State and the City of Bloomington; and WHEREAS, in connection with the State contract, certain roadway, roundabout, bridge, bridge walk, retaining wall, and sidewalk construction to be performed under State Project No. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169 =005) will be covered under Agreement No. 96484 between the State and the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I - CONSTRUCTION BY THE STATE Section A. Contract-Award The State shall advertise for technical and price proposals and award a design -build contract to the "Best value Proposer" for State Project No. 2776 -03 (T.H. 169 =005) in accordance with the State Request for Qualifications and Request for Proposal documents, which are on file in the office of the Commissioner of Transportation at St. Paul, Minnesota, and are made a part hereof by.reference with the same force and effect as.though fully set forth herein. 3 96483 Section B. Direction of Design -Build Construction The State shall direct all design -build activities performed under the design -build contract, and oversee all construction engineering and inspection functions in connection with the design -build contract construction. All design -build construction shall be performed in compliance with the State's Request for Proposals, the Contractor's technical proposal, and approved plans. Section C Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc. The State shall make changes in the design and /or contract construction, which may include the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement, and.shall enter into any necessary addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements with the State's contractor that are necessary to cause the design and construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. The State District Engineer's authorized representative will inform the appropriate City official of any proposed addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements to the construction contract that will affect the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement. The City may request additional work or changes to the work in the plans as part of the design build contract. Such request shall be made by an exchange of letter(s) with the State. If the State determines that the requested additional work or plan changes are necessary or desirable and can be accommodated without undue disruption to the project, the State will cause the additional work or plan changes to be made. The State reserves the right to invoice the City for the cost of any additional City requested work and plan changes, construction contract addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements, and associated construction engineering prior to the completion of the contract construction. I 2 96483 Section D. Satisfactory Completion of Design -Build Contract The State shall perform all other acts and functions necessary to cause the design -build contract to be completed in a satisfactory manner. If the City believes the City cost participation design or construction has not been properly performed or that the design or construction is defective, the City shall inform the State District Engineer's authorized representative in writing of those defects. Any recommendations made by the City are not binding on the State. The State shall have the exclusive right to determine whether the State's Contractor has satisfactorily performed the City cost participation design and construction covered under this Agreement. Final acceptance by the State of the completed design -build contract construction shall be-final, binding and conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of the design -build contract construction. ARTICLE II - BASIS OF PAYMENT BY THE CITY Section A. City Cost Participation Construction The City shall participate as indicated below in the bridge, retaining wall, roundabout, roadway, and storm water treatment construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to the Trunk Highway No. 169/2 -494 interchange under State Project No. 2776 -03 (T.H. 610 =333) and State Projects No. 120 -010 -012 and No. 120- 176 -.002. The lump sum amount is based on the engineer's estimate and includes all design and construction engineering delivery costs associated with the City's cost participation. A lump sum bid -based (percent of contract bid) payment amount will'be the City's share of the roadway, bridge, retaining wall, roundabout, roadway, and storm water treatment construction for the Trunk Highway No. 169/1 -494 interchange design -build construction and State contract construction engineering and is 5 96483 estimated to be $1,537,579.56. The final amount shall be determined based on 0.9098 percent of the design -build contract ontract construction engineering. bid unit price plus a 5% State c cost. Lighting Section A.1 Cost Participation for Potential City intensity Study erform a lighting The Design -Build contractor will p City has to determine the need for lighting on the project—The decided to wait until the results are available before ndeciding othe* the City's lighting needs for the project. The following be cost participation percentages for the various roundabout lighting. indicated, participate in the The City shall, at the percentage following roundabout lighting construction to be performed under A 5State contract State Project No. 2776 -03 (T-H'9be0added to the design -build construction engineering cost will construction costs. 1, 67 Percent shall be the City's rate of cost participation in all of the lighting construction for the West 78th Street /East Frontage Road roundabout. 2. 15.6 Percent shall be the City 's rate of cost participation in all of the lighting construction for the west intersection of West 78th Street /Trunk Highway No. 169 roundabout. Section B. Right of Way Accrujsition Costs The City shall pay to the State, as the City's full and complete fired by the State, a Right -of -Way cost share for Parcel No. 506 acquired is located lump sum amount equal to $189,600.00. The right of way adjacent to West 78th Street east of Trunk Highway No. 169. 96483 ARTICLE III - PAYMENT BY THE CITY Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost Share It is estimated that the City's share of the design -build contract plus-a 5o State contract construction engineering cost, plus a lump sum amount of $189,600.00 for Right -of -Way purchase, is the sum of $1,537,579.56. Upon award of the design -build contract, the City's lump sum payment shall be determined by-multiplying the contract bid price by City's cost percentage share plus 5 percent for the State's contract construction engineering plus the lump sum Right -of -way cost share. After the following conditions have been met, the City shall advance to the Commissioner of Transportation the City's lump sum cost share of the design -build contract plus the lump sum Right -of -Way cost share as described in ARTICLE II Sections A and B: 1. Execution and approval of this Agreement and the State's transmittal of it to the City. 2. Award of the design -build contract to the successful proposer for the design and construction to be performed hereunder. 3. Receipt by the City of a written request from the State for the advancement of funds. Section A.1 Advancement of the City's Cost Share For Potential Lighting If the City decides that additional lighting should be included in the design -build contract based upon the light intensity study, the City shall forward a letter to the State requesting the inclusion of the additional lighting: The State will then execute the necessary Change Order or Work Order with the design -build contractor for the additional lighting. The City's cost share shall be determined in accordance with ARTICLE II Section-A.1 of this agreement. 7 96483 After the following conditions have been met, the City shall advance to the Commissioner of Transportation the City's lighting cost share of the design -build contract as described in ARTICLE II Section A.1: 1. Execution and approval of the appropriate Change Order or Work Order and the State's transmittal of it to the City.. 2. Receipt by the City of a written request from the State for the advancement of funds. ARTICLE IV - ADDITIONAL CITY REQUESTED WORK - FINAL PAYMENT Design -build Contract Changes The City may request additional work or changes to the work as part of this design -build construction contract. Such request shall be by an exchange of letters) to the State. The State shall execute the necessary Change Order or Work Order with the design -build contractor. Such request by the City and concurrence by the State shall be included in an estimate of City costs for the Agreement. The State shall invoice the City for the estimated cost of such request. If design and construction engineering delivery costs are not included in the change order or work order estimate, the amount will be added to the City's estimate of costs. ARTICLE V - GENERAL PROVISIONS Section A. Maintenance by the City Upon completion of West 78th Street (from Washington Avenue to West Bush Lake Road) and the East Frontage Road (from West 78th Street to northern construction limits construction, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of the roadways (including the 2 roundabouts east of Washington Avenue) and all of the facilities a part thereof, without cost or expense to the State. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, snow, ice and debris removal, resurfacing and seal 0 96483 coating and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the roadways in a safe and usable condition. Upon completion of the West 78th Street and East Frontage Road storm sewer facilities construction, the City shall provide for the proper routine maintenance of those facilities, without cost or expense to the State. Routine maintenance includes, but is not limited to, removal of sediment, debris, vegetation and ice from structures, grates and pipes, repair of minor erosion problems, and minor structure and pipe repair, and any other maintenance activities necessary to preserve the facilities and to prevent conditions such as flooding, erosion, sedimentation or accelerated deterioration of the facilities. Upon completion of the treatment ponds and infiltration basins for State Project No. 2776 -03, the City shall participate in 18.7% of the routine and non - routine maintenance of the storm water treatment facilities. A separate maintenance agreement will be written with the State to cover the terms associated with the routine and non- routine storm water treatment maintenance responsibilities and payments. Upon completion of the West 78th Street and East Frontage Road. trail /walkways construction, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of the trail /walkways, without cost or expense to the State. Maintenance includes, but is not. limited to,-snow, ice and debris removal, patching, crack repair, panel replacement, mowing, trimming,'signing, pavement marking, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the trail /walkways in a safe and usable condition. Upon completion of the West 78th Street retaining wall construction located east of Viking Drive and Washington Avenue, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of and keep in repair the walls, 01 96483 without cost or expense to the State. Maintenance and repair includes, but is not limited to, graffiti removal and surface repair, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the walls in a safe, usable and aesthetically acceptable condition. Section A.1 Maintenance by the City For Potential City Lighting The design builder will be performing a lighting intensity study to determine the need for lighting on the project. Depending upon the results lighting may be installed as part of the project. If lighting is installed on the project the City will be responsible for the following maintenance requirements. Case 1 (Standard Mn /DOT Lighting-and Poles for Roundabouts with City and Mn /DOT approaches) Upon completion of the west intersection of the West 78th Street /Trunk Highway No. 169 roundabout lighting facilities construction, the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Edina in accordance with their respective agreements will provide for the proper maintenance of those facilities. Maintenance includes but is not limited to cleaning and relamping the luminaires. The cities will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the lighting facility. The cities will be responsible for the hook -up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply o the service pad or pole. As the owner of the system, the State will perform Gopher One underground locates and schedule system replacements when the useful service life has been reached. Case 2 (City Requested Aesthetic Non - Standard Lighting and Poles for Roundabouts with City and Mn /DOT approaches) th Upon completion of the west intersection of the West 78 Street /Trunk Highway No. 169 roundabout lighting facilities 10 96483 construction, the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Edina in accordance with their respective agreements will provide for the proper-maintenance of those facilities. Maintenance includes but is not limited to; replacing faulty luminaires and knocked down or otherwise damaged poles; repairing or replacing underground facilities and wiring; repairing service cabinets, photocells, and all other miscellaneous hardware to keep the lighting facilities in working order; cleaning and relamping the luminaires; and painting the lighting facilities. The cities will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to Operate the lighting facility. The cities will be responsible for the hook -up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole. As the State is not the owner of the system, the cities will perform Gopher One underground locates and schedule system replacements when the useful service life has been reached. Case 3 (Lighting For 100% City Owned Roundabouts /Frontage Roads and /or City Streets) Upon completion of the west 78th Street /East Frontage Road roundabout lighting facilities construction, the cities of Bloomington and Edina in accordance with their respective agreements will provide for the proper maintenance of those facilities. Maintenance includes but is not limited to; replacing faulty luminaires and knocked down or otherwise damaged poles; repairing or replacing underground facilities and wiring; repairing service cabinets, photocells, and all other miscellaneous hardware to keep the lighting facilities in- working order; cleaning and relamping the luminaires; and painting the lighting-facilities. The cities will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the 11 96483 lighting facility. The cities will be responsible for the hook- up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole. As the State is not the owner of the system, the cities will perform Gopher One underground locates and schedule system replacements when the useful service life has been reached. Section B. Additional Drainage Neither party to this Agreement shall drain any additional drainage into,the storm sewer facilities to be constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining written permission to do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract are shown in a drainage area map, EXHIBIT "Drainage Area ", which is on file in the office of the State's District Hydraulics Engineer at Roseville and is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. Section C. Future Responsibilities Upon completion of the West 78th Street and East Frontage Road construction located east of Viking Drive and Washington Avenue, the City shall thereafter accept full and total responsibility And all obligations and liabilities arising.out of or by reason of the use, operation, maintenance, repair and reconstruction of West 78th Street and East Frontage Road and all of the facilities a part thereof constructed hereunder, without cost or expense to the State. Section D Planning For Future Project The State proposed a project to reconstruct the Trunk Highway No. 169 and Interstate 494 interchange, which included the construction of 12 96483 roundabouts at Valley View Road's intersections with Washington Avenue, the west ramp terminal of Trunk Highway No. 169, the east ramp terminal of Trunk Highway No. 169, and the East Frontage Road. As a result of the updating of the traffic forecasts for the project, the proposed scope of the work proposed on Valley View Road was reduced to reflect minor intersection improvements and modifications to the existing signal systems located at the intersections listed above. As a result of coordination between the State, the City of Eden Prairie, and the City of Edina; the work located on Valley View Road will be removed from this contract. The State agrees to work with the Cities of Eden Prairie and Edina to develop a project for Valley View Road and the interchange of Valley View Road and Trunk Highway No. 169. The State's commitment will-be based upon the needs of Valley View Road and'the State's Cost Participation Policy for Cooperative Construction projects. Section E. Examination of Books, Records, Etc. As provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 160.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of each party relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by each party, and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor as appropriate,•for a minimum of six years'from final payment. Section F. Claims Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation Act. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern liability of the City. 13 96483 A Section G Agreement P roya l tiveit shall be and effec, Before this Agreement becomes binding such State and by approved by a City Council resolution and executed dto the Commissioner pp rovide in ad City officers as the law may p resentati.ve. of Transportation or their authorized rep ARTICLE VI - AUTHORIZED AGENTS Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of The State's Auth Agreements Agreement is Maryanne Kelly - Sonnek, Municipal Ag this Ag hone number are Her current address and p Engineer, or her successor. Paul, MN 55155, 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, St (651) 366 -4634. orized Agent for the purpose of the administration of The City s Auth or his successor. His this Agre hes, City ement is Gordon Hug Manager, Edina, MN current address and phone number are 4801 West 50,th Street, 55424, (952) 826 -0401, cinder of this page has been intentionally left blank] [The rem 14 lu 96483 EN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by their authorized officers. CITY OF EDINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Recommended for approval: By Mayor By District Engineer Approved: Date BY State Design Engineer By n Date Title Approved as to form and execution: Date By Contract Management Date COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION As delegated to Materials Management Division By Date 15 V, (4 ow Le "tea i REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.M. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Amendment To Final Plan, Interlachen Maintenance Facility INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: On July 7, 2009 the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for a parking lot with maintenance buildings at the Interlachen Country Club at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard. (See attached resolution, plans and minutes.) Interlachen is seeking to make revisions to the plans that were approved by the City Council. (See attached letter and revised plans.) The modifications to the plans are as follows: Enlarge, and move the wash stall area to the north and east end of the maintenance building. Construct a roof covering over the soils storage area. Add an overhead door to the west wall of the cart storage area. Per the City Council's current policy, the Council is asked to determine if these changes are significant enough to require an additional public hearing. If so, staff would recommend that the Council set a public hearing for October 16, 2010. No action is necessary if the revised plans are found to be acceptable. By Ordinance these changes would be characterized as a minor change to the approved plans, and could be approved by staff. Interlachen has notified the adjacent neighbors of the proposed changes. Additionally, staff sent the revised plans to the adjacent neighbor to the west. Staff finds the changes to be minor and. recommends that the Council take no action. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No.2009 -59 • Previously approved plans. • City Council Minutes. • Letter explaining the changes. • Revised plans RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -59 k gzN , APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT o FOR A PARKING LOT WITH MAINTENTANCE. BUILDINGS AT 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD FOR THE INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB n fN�RPORPTS o ee0 City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Interlachen Country Club is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand a,parking lot in conjunction with a new maintenance building. Maintenance buildings are a' permitted accessory use not a conditional use. Because the need for the parking lot is intertwined with the maintenance building, the maintenance building is also addressed as part of the CUP. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.03 The applicant originally proposed to locate the maintenance facility at the end of Belmore Lane. Those plans were reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 1, 2008 and January 28, 2009. Based on the direction from the Planning Commission on January 28th, the applicant revised the plans to locate the building on what was referred to as the "chicken farm site" south of the originally proposed site. The size of the main building was reduced from 20,000 square feet, and the building redesigned to match the existing club house. 1.04 The new parking lot would be located as part of a new 16,440 square foot maintenance facility, and part of a 1,840 square foot "caddy lounge" addition to the existing cart storage building. This existing building would be remodeled to match the proposed new building. 1.05 To accommodate the request, two existing single - family homes and the existing maintenance building would be removed. The proposed site is currently.used as a staging area and storage of materials by the maintenance crew. 1.06 On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for the Interlachen Golf Course. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions' per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. ' The maintenance facility is a permitted. accessory use. Associated uses proposed for these facilities are typical of a state -of -the art golf course country club. 4. The parking area and maintenance buildings would be'well screened from adjacent properties, by existing and proposed trees and landscaping. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com' TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -59 Page 2 5. There would be an improvement to the quality of the existing wetlands, by removing the existing maintenance building that is located 15 feet from a wetland and by the construction of stormwater retention ponds that would filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. 6. The buildings would be constructed to match the existing clubhouse. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a parking lot and maintenance buildings at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Building elevations date stamped July 1, 2009. • Building materials board presented to the City Council on July 7, 2009. The roof must be brown as presented in the building elevations. • Grading & drainage plans date stamped June 29, 2009. • Utility plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Landscape plan date stamped July 7, 2009. • Lighting plan date stamped June 29, 2009. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3. These lots must be combined with the golf course lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Access to the buildings shall be from the internal access points from Waterman Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, and not Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. 5. Maloney Avenue and Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 6. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements. 7. All conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2009. 8. Replace all diseased or dead trees on the site within 5 years of the date of this resolution. 9. The arborvitae trees to be planted adjacent to the new building must be planted at 8 feet tall. 10. The building shall be located as far to the east as is acceptable to the City Engineer and Fire Marshal, but must be at a minimum of 95 feet from the northwest corner of the building to the west lot line and 120 feet from the southwest corner of the building to the west lot line. 11. The lounge door proposed on the west side of the building must be moved to the south wall. The other door on the west side of the building must have an emergency bar on it. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -59 Page 3 12. The security lighting on the west side of the building must be shut off by 10:00 pm daily. 13. There shall be no noise from the building between the hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am, such as but not limited to radios, with the exception of noise allowed by Section 1040.03 of the City Code. 14. The south pond must have a fountain, and north pond must have a bubbler, both to be maintained and operated by Interlachen. 15. Interlachen is encouraged to remove the Buckthorn and new vegetation planted. 16. The site must be kept free of trash, debris and yard waste and must be maintained in a similar manner to other periphery areas on the golf course. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on J 1 7 09. ATTEST: )a' Debra A. Mangen, City r J6iTies B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2009. City Clerk Minutes /Edina City Council /July 7, 2009 Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the Conditional Use Permit process, the proposed Code revision and asked questions of Mr. Teague. . Member Bennett stated her concern with the protection of all R -1 neighborhoods from the adverse impact of nonresidential uses and large accessory buildings while the Planning Commission takes the ordinance revision under advisement. The Council noted the Interlachen application had been discussed numerous times, a number of. similar maintenance structures had been permitted, and it was not anticipated that additional applications for maintenance structures would be received. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant First Reading and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2009 -08, amending the City Code concerning regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, directing the Planning Commission to prepare an ordinance amendment relative to CUPs for accessory buildings in the R -1 district to be returned for Council's consideration within ninety days. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -59 ADOPTED APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB, 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD — PUBLIC HEARING HELD Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Member Housh recused himself from consideration of this item due to his membership in the Interlachen Country Club. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the request of Interlachen Golf Course for a CUP for a new maintenance building and parking lot subject to findings and conditions outlined in the draft resolution. He advised the Council of the changes made to the building materials, building location shift to the east, increased landscape plan, and addition of a fence. Proponent Presentation Lyle Ward, 6613 Biscayne Boulevard, Interlachen Country Club Board of Governors, reviewed the history of Interlachen Country Club, its benefit to the City, and its need for a new maintenance facility to abide by current building codes, environmental laws, and employee safety codes. Craig Christensen, 5812 Hidden Lane, Interlachen Country Club Board of Governors, presented the project site and noted that all other golf courses in Edina had constructed new maintenance facilities. Mr. Christensen described the number of meetings held with the neighborhood and Planning Commission and commented on the importance of having facilities that fit this prestigious golf course. Truman Howell, architect of the project, described the outdoor lighting plan. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague and the proponents about the specifics of the project. It was agreed the buffered landscape would address many concerns that had been expressed and the proponent was advised of noise disturbances caused by equipment start up, back -up beepers, and radios. The proponent stated their equipment was not equipped with back -up beepers, radios Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 7. 2009 would not be allowed, and equipment would be started inside the maintenance facility, once it had been constructed. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:37 p:m Public Testimony Jane Clifford, 421 Kresse Circle, addressed the Council. Stephen Tinkham, 417 Kresse Circle, addressed the Council. John King, 413 Kresse Circle, addressed the Council: Judy Scattergood, 420 Kresse Circle, addressed the Council. Joan VVierzba, 6217 Belmore Avenue, addressed the Council. Mary McNamara, 6221 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Council. Margaret McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane, addressed the Council. Harlan Clark, 409 Kresse'Circle, addressed the Council. Melanie Tinkham, 417 Kresse Circle, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Abstain: Housh Motion carried. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague and Mr. Howell, and discussed the proposed building and its location. The proponent indicated there were only`two building sites, as proposed between the two ponds or the Belmore Avenue location, and advised of the need for truck access to the location for soils storage. The proponent stated they, had' always proceeded in good faith and would move the building farther east, if feasible. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -59, approving a conditional, use permit fora parking lot with maintenance buildings at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for the Interlachen Country, Club based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets .the, Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E., of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The maintenance facility is a permitted accessory use. Associated uses proposed for these facilities are typical of a state -of- the -art golf course country club. 4. The parking area and .maintenance buildings would be well screened from adjacent properties, by existing and proposed trees and landscaping. S. There would be an improvement to the quality of the existing wetlands, by removing the existing maintenance building that is located 15 feet from a wetland and. by the construction of stormwater retention ponds that would filter out sediment before draining into the wetlands. 6. The buildings would be constructed to match the existing clubhouse. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with the following plans, unless modified'by the conditions below: C Site plan datestamped June 29, 2009. Building elevations date stamped July 1, 2009. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 7. 2009 • Building materials board presented to the City Council on July 7, 2009. The roof must be brown as presented in the building elevations. • Grading & drainage plans date stamped June 29, 2009. • Utility plan date stamped June 29, 2009. • Landscape plan date stamped July 7, 2009. • Lighting plan date stamped June 29, 2009. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City will require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3. These lots must be combined with the golf course lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Access to the buildings shall be from the internal access points from Waterman Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, and not Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. 5. Maloney Avenue and Belmore Lane may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. 6. The buildings must meet all applicable building permit requirements. 7. All conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2009. 8. Replace all diseased or dead trees on the site within five years of the date of this resolution. 9. The arborvitae trees are to be planted adjacent to the new building must be planted at 8 feet tall. 10. The building shall be located as far to the east as is acceptable to the City Engineer and Fire Marshal, but must be at a minimum of 95 feet from the northwest corner of the building to the west lot line and 120 feet from the southwest corner of the building to the west lot line. 11. The lounge door proposed on the west side of the building must be moved to the south wall. The other door on the west side of the building must have an emergency bar on it. 12. The security lighting on the west side of the building must be shut off by 10:00 pm daily. 13. There shall be no noise from the building between the hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am, such as but not limited to radios, with the exception of noise allowed by Section 1040.03 of the City Code. 14. The south pond must have a fountain, and north pond must have a bubbler, both to be maintained and operated by Interlachen. 15. Interlachen is encouraged to remove the Buckthorn and new vegetation planted. 16. The site must be kept free of trash, debris and yard waste and must be maintained in a similar manner to other periphery areas on the golf course. Member Bennett seconded the motion. The Council discussed the difficulty in making this decision. The proponents and residents were thanked for their professionalism and cooperative work during this process. Member Bennett stated she was unable to support this application without additional discussion to determine the building location and option of earth berming. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Abstain: Housh Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -09 ADOPTED AMENDING SECTION 850.13, SUBD. 7. PERMITTING EFFICIENCY DWELLING UNITS IN PSD-4 — PUBLIC HEARING HELD Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the Planning Commission's recommendation to add efficiency dwelling units in the planned senior district (PSD -4) and past considerations of senior housing. Page 4 s o ' (D DQ x 1 PLAN: MAINTENANCE FACILITY LANDSCAPE PLAN o 30 60 SCALE IN FEET u: v A tfk! U-Ekb TREE LEGEND: .o Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor ��4� Triumph Elm Ulmus 'Morton Glossy, American Larch Larix laricina Norway Spruce Picea abies Canadian Hemlock Tsuga canadensis Techny arborvitae Thuja occidentalis DExisting tree to be saved. See Sheet C5, Tree Preservation Plan Q GROUNDCOVER LEGEND: EjFine Fescue Grass Mix Wet Meadow Mix 5' Gravel Maintenance Strip µ ❑Mix: 50% August Moon Hosta, 50 %D Dre's Dagger Crested Lady Fern F f Heavy Metal Switch Grass Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle lonicera QDiervilla 4 Iitl� Ivory Halo Dogwood Cornus 'Bailhalo' / alba Common Lilac Syringa vulgaris Arrrowwood Viburnum Viburnum dentatum PLANT LEGEND: REVISIONS BARR 1-800- 32-2277 P_t 6/R ENGINEENINC CO. 4100 WM - STREET MINNEfiR SL MN. 55x05 -x605 600- fi52 -227J �v:'(952) fiJ2 -2601 ..N.n.mm 6 � � w „ Z z w� � E 3 of E _ ado V o= - w ro.s�o w T'd Nvy W out„ TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 17615 XUiD11NS ME MMNE 0NKA MN 55345 (957)401 -7989 FAt(952)101 -1918 DATE 6/26/2009 SCALE -301_0. DRAPING PPL- MTING SHEET NO. L1 I ( I u _ n PAMQW '•,I_I I I I '•I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � r t5 7 '\\y - - L Lu IV QL I - - SITE PLAN ASI p ■ � .Ya r S nPnrrou'ca PLA4V REVISIONS cn Z Z0 Q U J IL z0 S cc i d.Z ve w g zPQ E- RUMAN OWELL I& ASSOC.,IA 11815 NIIRIINS 09K YINIET"k MN 5531 DATE 6/26/09 SCALE 1'- 30' -0' DRAWNC SrrE PLAN SHEET N0, AS1 SHEET OF - - W04 26W E STORAGE CED cm STORAGE - Ea11P AdOfdC 9<�AOP� .. C S � °..NOP cm OFFS cmm PARIS ® ?9%4 Yid ® OFPIGE am Golm am II rsr� nZ 4 oFrlce TRAINING MENS MN Loa OPME! eAra maa i MAINTENANCE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN N C3 ,a -,•_ra REVISIONS W 0 gF Z8 :32 CL �w HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 17M5 N110Db OM 11P8d7M. AN 553ts (dal -� rec(� -AIe DATE 6/26/09 SCALE 3 /3X-T -W DRAVANG MAW BULDM FL SHEET N0. A3 S@ET OF WE U4,11 PLAN ®CADDIE SHACK/ CART STORAGE A2 yam• . ro• WaoD TM snj= ® IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII loin 11,11 ■ "' p ►'' ■' ■'� "' ■'■'` °" = =o m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII aml ontoo 1111111, �II111111111111tIIIIIIIIIIItIIIIIIIJll6ullll 0 v iiillllllllllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ■1 O Q NORTH v COLOR SCHEDULE MATERIAL COLOR. ® RIBBED STS ROOF PANEL" BURWS EO SLATE QED PIETAL PASCIA - BU MIED SLAT: ® RIBBED STEEL WALL PANEL . BLIRMSHED SLATE - 1Ra STEEL TRD1 '^ BURNISHED SLATE . ® ST OW WHITE fT0 MAT" EXISTNG BU)SW, TR-Z WOOD T21M - BROWN (TO MATON EXISTMO_ BLDGW L DR-I DOORS WHIT: ® WINDOW MID DOOR FRAMES WHITE . BOTTOM Op�A9f�11 ,� . BEV•9' -6' --HOOD T" 1R -7 s WEST ELEVATION Az �• • I� 1 .• _�•... ® 'i'�Iw����I "I�LI�I ■I ■I ■I ■I ®I� I ■I ■I ■I ■ICI ■ICI ■I ■I ■ICI! _ ... illllllllllllltilllllllllillllll�ulllll■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII !Illlllllfl �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIlllllll�lllllllllllllllllllllllll� EAST ELEVATION v W�I =am REVISIONS N tt' C W Li f� Z z� DATE 6/26/09 SCALE 3/32• -P -0• DRARNO a CART W/ SHEET NO, A2 SHEET OF ®HOOD 7RAi "'�� 1R-3 HOOD TRRT ®S1U000 I B.EY•10'-0' .. TR-1 SIBS OUTSR7B- CORNBt `ALLII CLAD HMXW --- . IT. IT ass NEW WLLl PANEL( DODR w oPe� GR -I SOUTH ELEVATION.® MAINTENANCE BUILDING 4Br�L MEL BaLMD --3 Mmw (T7P). WILL P�� .tr ■ C' OVER HEAD IN aEV•IOw' sr� carast TR-I sTEa ELEY•O'-0' RR ALW 9roRi�RONr iu/ 6LA5S® (TV) o ® D ®C �1 EAST ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING AIJ arm' . W R® STES. HALL --"' WILLOW PANEL® MAIL DOOR A mm �s1 WEST ELEVATION S. MAINTENANCE BUILDING A� s/�z• • ro• TRLBB �AwN9_�L _ EtEV•BO' TOP OF caNC sLAa.� B.EV•O-0' COLOR "SCHEDULE MATERIAL COLOR' ® RIBBED STEEL ROOF PANS BURNI%EV,SLATE METAL FASCIA - BURNISLI'D ELATE RISSM STEEL WALL PANS BLRNISVED ELATE STEM TWH BID2NISF® SLATE - ®, -STWW- WHITE (TO MATCH IXISTINO. BLOM 7R-7 WOOD TRLM BROW? (TO M4TC4 OOSTINS BLOM DR-I DOORS WFIRE Q WH=W AND DOOR FRAIPW UNITE n liEB48eARMB A B EV• STEEL OUISM - OOFb1Ht TRH ELEV.O-0' AW10. ML do D. m/ A'b® WLLL PANG" q NORTH ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING e� JJJk REVISONS Z 0 ir oo ZU � cr Z �w w HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. k7MEMxA UN 55W P*M -70 FQ(95 7M DATE 6/26/09 SCALE 3/32' - -W DRAWING MAW BULDM ELEVA nom SHEET NO. Al SHEET OF City of Edina Planning Dept. 48oi W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Interlachen Country Club Edina, MN � .11 ■ 17815 HUTCHINS DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN 55345 23 401 -7889 • FAX (952) 401 -7 architects@th-arch.com Construction plans have been submitted for the Interlachen Country Club's new maintenance facilities and been approved. Subsequent to that approval some modifications to the plans have been required to conform to the wishes of the adjacent neighborhood's concerns as well as minor adjustments for additional environmental protection above the soil storage area and an small increase in the footprint of the equipment wash area. These modifications are as listed below: • Increase of 250 sq.ft. and movement of the wash stall to the north east end of the main maintenance building, to improve access for equipment. • Provide a roof covering over the soils storage area to protect soils from rain and snow and to improve the exterior appearance of the area. • Revise office area to comply with City Council directive for the neighbors concern about the exit door from the lounge. • An overhead door added to the west wall of the cart storage area to accommodate internal circulation needs. We would like to present these modifications to the City Council at the earliest possible time to ask for their approval to proceed with them. Truman Howell Architects & Associates, Inc. •�.I/ *ate ,�/ 't ��'.. < --n W III i 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET R PI.dN 1 ISSUFT FOR CONSTRUCTION 09/29/2010 TREE LEGEND: Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Triumph Elm Ulmus 'Morton Glossy, American Larch Larix laricina Norway Spruce Picea abies Canadian Hemlock Tsuga canadensis Techny arborvitae Thuja occidentalis Existing tree to be saved. See Sheet C5, Tree Preservation Plan GROUNDCOVER LEGEND: Fine Fescue Grass Mix PLANT LEGEND: Common Name I Latin Name lOwntily ISIx. S acin Shrubs and Groundcowis R k�%I� Wet Meadow Mix 60 °4' Gravel Maintenance Strip 7 0& Mix: 50% August Moon Hosta, Ath lum IiNx- lemins tbeY Da r 50 °/D Dre's Dagger Crested Lady Fern if 2 Cont. Heavy Metal Switch Grass Dwad6ush Hone suckle Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' 366 02 Cant Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle Heavy Metal Switch rasa Panicum w fm 'Hay Afetal' Diervilla lonicera M t ConL Halo Dogwood ®Ivory Comus alba 'Bailhalo' 96 Common Lilac 6 O.C. Syringa vulgaris 5 a vul ana Arrowwood Viburnum N 5 C.L Vibumum dentatum PLANT LEGEND: Common Name I Latin Name lOwntily ISIx. S acin Shrubs and Groundcowis Au ust Moon Hosta Host* Au ust Mb n' 60 A 2 CmL 7 0& Dre's Dagger Crested Lady Fem Ath lum IiNx- lemins tbeY Da r 80 if 2 Cont. 7 O.C. Dwad6ush Hone suckle Di*M9s lonicera 366 02 Cant 30.C. Heavy Metal Switch rasa Panicum w fm 'Hay Afetal' 10157 M t ConL 70.C. Awry Halo Dogwood COmWS e15a 'Bafthalo' 96 %2 Cunt 6 O.C. Common Lilac 5 a vul ana 13 N 5 C.L 6 O.C. Armwxood Vibumum Vffi umum dentatum 16 # 5 Cont. 1V O.C. REWI90NS BARR . —2211 PN --2211 eWP fNGWEERNC Ca. ItaO WEST Tml STPEEf YNWFAPCNS, 1a1 SS.JS -MO] Pn ,- oo-slz -zzn E~ � d w „ W ED �E -poi mr o oSo d _ z rc o g W VI oEo o ` � N ;c z O - =m LOS co O�3 a o TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 1]PIS n K WIN pSN M -70 F MN 55115 (sst)tw -7® ru:lasz)ra -me DATE 09/29/2010 1 • DRAWING PLANnNG SHEET NO Ls1 ( SITE PLAN N #LAO REVISIONS r W U U d 0 dw u z Z x za 3 TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. Jna1s xu7aws wn� uINWTaK� IM svgs (sst)wI -mss �ez(ss�wi -me CATE 9/30/10 SCALE 1'- 30' -0' DRAWING SRE PLAN SHEET NO. AS1 SHEET OF RENSIONS m rAa Ga u TRUMAN HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. rm5 WTmmrs Dme mrmEMA, NN 5S345 (gym -� rk(�m -me DATE 9/30/10 SCALE 3/32' -T -O' DRAWING MAN BULLING F-00R 'SHEET NO. A3 SHEET , '.OF .. Az g PLAN ® CADDIE SHACK/ CART STORAGE A2 932•.ro• HOW TRIM Sri= o Illlllllllllu ®i ®I ®I\ I �iioi�� ■� ®lea ®I ®�■ ■I ®I ■I oII! __ Illll�llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllll © SOUTH ELEVATION v D �Iili�fl�l�ltltl \Its o - Ililillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll !�' . =� -- m �1 NORTH ELEVATION ,(� 332• , I' -0• STS 01(7 TR I FROSTING BEO5m i, mSS BEARING IIIIIIII r B".Tw ®Stucco TR -D NOOO ttzAi AUIM CLAD WINDOWS �, LIMA COLOR SCHEDULE L_BOSTING OVER RIBBED S MATERIAL COLOR ® RIBBED STEEL ROOF PANE. BURNISU® SLATE ` EAST ELEVATION ® PETAL FASCIA . BURNISWEV SLATE ®`RIBBED sTl$ WALL PANEL BURNISWED SLATE rRa STffi. TRIM . BURi1514ED SLATE =. . ® 5TUCW - WHITE (TO HATCN.D(ISTING,BLDGW TR -Z WOOD TRPI BROM ITO MATOU EXISTING BU>SW OR-1 DOORS HEATS -.. ® WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES Y471TE . PI=D ® . PAIla PIBBID PAID P}I—J � � —3 RI AW1 BS 5 J . . STOREFRONT — �_I ® HALL PAID DOOR W INSL GLASS DRa s WEST ELEVATION A2 332•.ro• RIBBED S R'_ PdNE{ RP-I . R WBBBD STE3 L_BOSTING OVER RIBBED S NlLL PANG_ PS-1 {SAD DOOR WALL PM %51 EAST ELEVATION A2 332• . I' -0• HOWEL ARCHITECT & ASSOC.0 DAIS RROOG OW III"IIIIII IIIII�IIIIIIII METAL FASCIA DATE II II II II I' II II I I I I I I I I II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 I I Illy I I I I I I I O 9/30/10 SCALE STS OuTsDE 3/32' -T-W cORr>ffR rRa ORAWINO ADDIS SHK PLANS /SEEN SHEET NO. A.2 SHEET OF l TR -� Noon TRM -� ®STUCCO 15� B1 -V.B'4 • ECEIVE 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIU%\ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_ Illllililllllll ,llllllllll %I\Iitl IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Y aEV.Oa - ,� CLAD STS BOLD =J . fTTPJ;; RI. 5 KALL RR�mL O uV INSUL 0.0x5® L12'. 12' OVER WM - HALL PAIGL® 000R � ors aza SOUTH ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING AI 162• ; rd m STS BaLAf� -� -- RlBe87 (TTPJ HALL Pd(L3�� 12'. D' ova: HEAD . DOOR -,-(DEDGED i, 1RI59 FEARING IN EiEV•9'd' - OOi3�t�T,RIW 0 �� 1��IIIICDCZDCZDCDI[ ELEyca -0' RI6B® STffi.: ALUM CLAD STEEL DOLL= HALL PAtJg® ALIM STOfBRONi m/ RJ91 GLASSO (TTPI DOOR m7 RL9L Gl2:fi D' . 12 OVB2 LEAD oRW O DOOR m/ OPi3030 DR4 2 EAST ELEVATION m MAINTENANCE BUILDING AI a/2• -r -0' D - TR-2 Wogo TRM Ayr . . if 11 11 11 ®STUCCO J, Tla FFAw A9 e.EV.a'a TRa FTC ouT51cE CORNER mm m .......... EtEV.ad R19BED STEEL HALL � - - HOLLOW PATH® T£TAL DOOR A FRAre oR -1 3 WEST ELEVATION ® MAINTENANCE BUILDING AI 392' . r -0' Ta>=s FEARINe .�, BEVc6'd COLOR SCHEDULE MATERIAL COLOR RIBBED STffi- ROOP PALL BURNISHED SLATE ® METAL PASCIA BURNISHED SUITE ® RIBBED STEEL WALL PANEL BURNISHED SLATE. - .7R-I STEEL TRIM BURNISHED SLATE . ® ST0000 WHITE (TO MATCH EXISTING BLD65) TR -] WOOD TRIM - BROWN (TO. HATCW EXISTING BLCIGIV DR-1 DOORS K-11TE ® WINDOW AND DOOR FRN'ES, WHITE �AS TR75S FEARING /L BJ V.9'1' STEEL OUTSIDE 000m TR-I B.EVcpd AM CLAD W R7BBED 57EB.® uV Ral. SLAKE) WALL PAID q NORTH ELEVATION m MAINTENANCE BUILDING FW$69 l AI 9/92• = r -0• r REM90NS U6 Z a v Y HOWELL ARCHITECTS & ASSOC.,INC. 17MI W110W5 ORNE WO -70 NdM*M-MB DATE 9/30/10 SCALE 3/32' -1' -0' DRAWING MAINT BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHEET NO. Al. SHEET OF R55CKREG LOG20000 150.00 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 339250 9/23/2010 116531 ABLE SPRINKLER Council Check Register Page - 1 390.59 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245938 9/23/2010 -9/2312010 01374.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339248 9/2312010 105.91 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 245940 7584 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,780.00 FITNESS EQUIPMENT 00003789 245936 022018715 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 560.00 FITNESS EQUIPMENT 00003789 245937 022018720 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,340.00 245943 7581 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 339249 9123/2010 1,183.34 101833 A.T.O.M. 245944 7580 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 150.00 TRAINING 00003138 245849 27309328 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN CITY HALL GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CLUB HOUSE WM-488 S GARDEN ESTATES N'HOOD 150.00 339250 9/23/2010 116531 ABLE SPRINKLER 390.59 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245938 7579 01374.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 284.93 SPRINKLER REPAIR, 245939 7582 01374.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 105.91 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245940 7584 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 224.35 245941 7585 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 609.71 245942 7583 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 410.41 245943 7581 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,183.34 245944 7580 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 58.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245945 7586 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 3,267.74 339261 9/2312010 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 2,611.62 SEPT 2010 SERVICES 245626 1575648 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,611.62 339262 9/2312010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 58.65 245727 0807547 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 23.80 245728 0807542 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 42.00 246043 0724580 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 91.80 246044 0807473 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 155.30 246045 0807543 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 31.00 246046 0724579 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 402.55 339253 9123/2010 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 899.40 ALARM MONITORING 245850 31946969 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE 899.40 339254 9/2312010 123708 ADVANCED IRRIGATION INC. 94.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR - ANDOVER DR 245946 44457 05488.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN' 94.95 339266 912312010 100676 ALL SAFE INC. BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN CITY HALL GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CLUB HOUSE WM-488 S GARDEN ESTATES N'HOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA. 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 2 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 92.24 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245627 101334 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 330.24 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 245947 101335 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 422.48 339256 9/23/2010 127262 ALLEN, ALICIA 75.00 WORK BOOTS 245948 051310 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 75.00 339257 9/23/2010 127259 ALLSTAR PAINTING & FINISHING 506.55 OFFICE PAINTING 245949 1 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 506.55 339268 9123/2010 127114 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE 154.97 DOOR INSTALLATION 00001208 245676 36675 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 903.09 CHAIRS 00005717 245851 36401 '4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 2,458.13 FURNITURE INSTALLATION 00001206 245852 358141 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 2,639.41 FILE CABINETS, SHELVING 00005717 245853 36423 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 6,155.60 339259 9/23/2010 127260 ANDERSON, MARCIA 150.00 JS JUDGE 245950 090910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION J 150.00 339260 912312010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 986.07 FOOD 245854 1421862 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 986.07 339261 9/23/2010 114799 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES IN 367.39 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 246089 092410 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 367.39 339262 912312010 103066 AQUA CITY. IRRIGATION INC 703.60 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245951 35128 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 703.60 339263 9/2312010 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 546.75 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245952 37996 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 546.75 339264 9123/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 227.43 COFFEE 245628 417312 1550.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL `o' 337.48 COFFEE 245629 910871 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES'-• CENTRAL SERVICE 'SNERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010, .8:57:16 Council Check Register Page -. 3 9/23/2010 — 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 99.99 SERVICE COFFEE MACHINE 245953 969070 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 664.90 339266 .912312010 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 250.62 COVE BASE FOR SIGN SHOP 00001209 245677 10038359 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 250.62 339266 9/23/2010 114476 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 144:28 ALARM MONITORING 00001631 245855 146253 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.19 ALARM MONITORING 00001630 245856 146254 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 339267 9123/2010 121019 ASCE 100.00 U.S. TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL 211691 337442 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 100.00 339268 9/23/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 397.50 DUMPSTER FOR OLD PW BLDG 00001334 245630 1086331 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 397.50 339269 9/23/2010 127270 ASPHALT ASSOCIATES INC. 5,200.00 PARKING AREA, DRIVE LANE 00005712 246096 86667 1380.6518 BLACKTOP. PARKING LOTS 5,200.00 339270 9/23/2010 100638 BACHMAN'S 2,103.62 TREES 00002378 245954 24376 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,103.62 339271 9/23/2010 101482 - BARCO PRODUCTS CO. 317.50 RECYCLING/TRASH CANS 00001431 245678 071001810 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 317.50 339272 9/23/2010 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3,367.00 LIFT STATION #2 PROJECCT 245679 23271114.00 -2 10041.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN. LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 3,367.00 339273 9/23/2010 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 15.98 BATTERIES 00003139 245857 018 - 213245 1401.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 15.98 339274 9/23/2010 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 200.56 BATTERIES 00005147 245631 7/116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 4 9123/2010 - 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10.00 BATTERIES 00005147 245632 7/530 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.00- CREDIT 00005760 245633 7/538 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 365.69 BATTERIES 00005147 245634 7/821 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 456.25 339276 9123/2010 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 531.90 245729 54680200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,417.40 245730 54763500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 271.55 245731 54772300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 224.59 245732 54771300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 244.55 245733 54771100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 868.10 245734 54771200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,885.65 245735 54763900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,139.25 245736 54763800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 58.86 245737 84168000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 20.50 246047 54763600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 135.08 246048 5981200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 121.07 246049 84143000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6.30 246050 84168100. 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 92.26 246050 84168100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,017.06 339276 9/2312010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 45.00 AWARDS SHIPPING 245858 091610 2210.6235 POSTAGE COMMUNICATIONS 45.00 339277 9/2312010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 16.61 WO- 642554 -1 245635 WO- 642554 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 62.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 245636 WO- 641853 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 16.25 WRIST REST 245637 WO- 639880 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2.13 POCKET PROTECTORS 245638 WO- 639856 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 163.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 245639 WO- 640763 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 16.61- CREDIT FOR STAPLES 245640 CP- WO- 642554 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22.39 CUSTOM STAMP 245859 IN -19486 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 266.85 339278 9/2312010 100649 BEST BUY BUSINESS ADVANTAGE AC 2,237.93 TVS FOR PW LUNCHROOM 00004553 245955 338329 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 38.44 ALLOWANCE 245956 339319 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING .02 BAL ON INV 235748 245957 00455320100827 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,199.51 R55CKREG . LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2212010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/23/2010 -9/2312010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339279 9123/2010 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 6,491.64 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 246090 092410 47068.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BREDESON PARK PATHWAY 40,231.02 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 246090 092410 5600.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 44,783.48 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 246090 092410 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE 70,107.01 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 246090 092410 5400.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 161,613.15 339280 9/23/2010 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 245860 22653 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 65.19 245861 22652 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 65.19 245862 22651 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 179.19 245863 22915 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 34.34 245864 22916 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 34.34 245865 22917 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 412.59 339281 9/23/2010 120610 BLOOMINGTON CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 1,076.50 T- SHIRTS 245958 29111 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 1,076.50 339282 9/23/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 24.38 WALL CLOCKS, PRINTER CARTRID08001437 245680 62559 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 48.77 WALL CLOCKS, PRINTER CARTRID028001437 245680 62559 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 48.77 WALL CLOCKS, PRINTER CARTRIDGBOO1437 245680 62559 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE .48.77 WALL CLOCKS, PRINTER CARTRID0M001437 245680 62559 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 46.77 WALL CLOCKS, PRINTER CARTRID0OB001437 245680 62559 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 118.03 WALL CLOCKS, PRINTER CARTRID ®001437 245680 62559 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 394.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001556 245681 61987 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 132.31 SOT LABEL TAPE 00003802 245959 62604 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 864.00 339283 912312010 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 17,675.00 PROSECUTING 245866 48665 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 17,075.00 339284 912312010 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 343.67 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003793 245960 87182006 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES. 00003793 245961 87182439 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 417.87 339286 912312010 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 671.88 HUB ASSEMBLIES, SEALS 00005113 245581 440736 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG L0620000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 - 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 671.88 339286 9/23/2010 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 11.78 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.76 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.12 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.09 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 32.91 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 44.00 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5410.6235 POSTAGE 50.31 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 54.46 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5430.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 84.40 PETTY CASH 245867 091610 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 340.83 339287 9/23/1010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,219.75 MATERIALS TESTING 245682 323269 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN. 187.25 MATERIALS TESTING 245683 323835 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,407.00 339288 912312010 '103239 -BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 2,080.00 EAST ENTRY DOOR CLOSURE 245641 514020S 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,080.00 339289 912312010 106484 . BRINDLE, MARY . 45.00 WORKSHOP FEE 245962 091610 1100.6104 CONFERENCES B SCHOOLS 45.00 339290 9/2312010 103264 BRO -TEX INC. 106.41 ABSORPSION PADS 00001610 245642 392411 1646.6610 -SAFETY EQUIPMENT 106.41 339291 9/23/2010 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 997.75 INFIELD MIXTURE 00005442 245868 083110 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 997.75 339292 9/2312010 127249 BURRETS, PATTY 150.00 JS JUDGE 245963 090910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00 339293 9123/2010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 3,631.23 ASPHALT 00001210 245684 8356MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 11,259.85 ASPHALT 00001210 245685 8373MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page 6 Business Unit GRILL CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE GRILL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD CITY HALL GENERAL CITY COUNCIL BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVAT!- R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 7 9/23/2010 - 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9,686.59 ASPHALT 00001210 245686 8390MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 4,832.26 ASPHALT 00001210 245687 8402MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 29,409.93 339294 9/23/2010 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,216.85 245738 12502 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.55 245739 12491 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 562.80 245740 12492 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,823.20 339295 9/2312010 100463 CASUAL CONTRACT 2,612.00 FURNITURE 00006104 245869 081610 /BRAEMAR 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 2,612.00 339296 9123/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 500.00 245741 87617 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107.00 245742 87641 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 607.00 339297 9/23/2010 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY - 12.82 245599 090210 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 12.82 245599 090210 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 22.68 245599 090210 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 23.22 245599 090210 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 28.39 245599 090210 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 42.73 245599 090210 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 45.96, 245599 090210 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.96 245599 090210 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 63.49 245599 090210 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 77.40 245599. 090210 5630.6186: HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 88.45 --245599 090210 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 97.83 245599 090210 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 202.45 245599 090210 5111.6186. HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 264.16 245599 090210 1646.6186 HEAT - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 299.60 245599 - 090210 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 509.49 245599 090210 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 5,781.31 245599 090210 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 7,618.76 339298 9/23/2010 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 6,908.73 245582 2049012 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 6,908.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339299 912312010 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.26 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 245598 68628 2210.6575- PRINTING 151.26- 339300 9/23/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page- 8 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 130.00 245743 427509 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING' 358.44 246051 427267 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 130.00 246052 427626 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING GRILL ADAPTIVE RECREATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUBHOUSE CLUB HOUSE CLUBHOUSE CLUB HOUSE GOLF. DOME PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING 736.66 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 245583 294945,294946 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 736.67 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 245583 294945,294946 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 736.67 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 245583 294945,294946 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK-SELLING 2,210.00 618.44 339301 912312010 127247 CITY OF EDINA - AQUATIC CENTE 75.75 CONCESSION PRODUCT 245964 092010 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 75.75 339302 912312010 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS. 85.50 DVDS OF THEATER CAMP: 245643 COM860 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.50 339303 9/23/2010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 289.72 00079303 -0155300018 245965 155300018 -9/10 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 44.96 00079303- 0155300009 245966 155300009 -9/10 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 3,820.42 00110793- 0155200000 245967 155200000 -9/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 44.96 00110793- 0155250009 245968 110793 -9/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 87.87 00110793 - 0155250018 245969 155250018 -9/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 44.96 00110793 - 0173001000 245970 173001000 -9/10 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 44.96 00110793 - 0173001001 245971 173001001 -9/10 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER 216.68 00113607 - 0170005201 245972 170005201 -9/10 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER 1,405.90 00103650 - 0155252016 245973 155252016 -9/10 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 617.85 00103650- 0155251008 245974 155251008 -9/10 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 771.53 00103650- 0155251026 245975 155251026 -9/10 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 7,389.81 339304 912312010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 541.60 246053 0118154427 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 541.60 339305 9/2312010 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT GRILL ADAPTIVE RECREATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUBHOUSE CLUB HOUSE CLUBHOUSE CLUB HOUSE GOLF. DOME PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING 736.66 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 245583 294945,294946 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 736.67 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 245583 294945,294946 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 736.67 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 245583 294945,294946 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK-SELLING 2,210.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 9 9/23/2010 —9123/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 339306 9123/2010 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 51.85 ASPHALT 00001222 245688 083110 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 21,143.02 ASPHALT 00001222 245688 083110 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 21,194.87 339307 9/23/2010 114283 COMPAR INC. 2,670.88 TOUGHBOOK FOR TERRY K 00004356 245689 192219 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,670.88 3.39308 " 912312010 117348' CONBOY, DAN 2,000.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 245870 091510` 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,000.00 339309 912312010 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 113.59 ELEMENTS 00009251 245644 _ INV000054721 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 113.59 339310 9/23/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 2,958.33 PREVENTATIVE MAINT CONTRACT 00008098, 245690 71902 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,958.33 339311 9123/2010 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 774.84 SOD 00002383 245976 1921 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 774.84 339312 9/2312010 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH 669.04 TOP STRUCTURE, SLATS 00001705 245584 S000021360 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 669.04 339313 9/23/2016 102596 CROWN TROPHY 215.89 PLAQUES 00006102 245871 24113 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 187.73 TROPHY 245872 23934 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 403.62 J 339314 9/23/2010 106192 CUB FOODS SOUTHDALE . 106.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 212733 060109 1470.4325 FIRE FEES -ALL OTHER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 339316 9/23/2010 100700 CURTIS -1000 -MIDWEST 1,765.57 PARKING PERMIT STICKERS 245977 2663703 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,765.57 R55CKREG LOG20000 7,003.60 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 104020 DALCO COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 9/23/2010 - 9/23/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339316 9/23/2010 102791 02 SERVICES INC. 104.25 5,327.60 SCADA UPGRADES 00001714 245691 9938 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,676.00 SCADA MOVE FINAL PMT 00005430 245692 9937 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1646.6406 5421.6511 5630.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 5862.5514 5421.5510 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 10 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD 5842.5514 7,003.60 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 339317 9/23/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 104020 DALCO COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 78.92 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001135 245873 2232918 104.25 WINDEX CLEANER 00006330 245874 2249689 362.31 DEGREASER 00002356 245978 2247839 1,423.90 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008077 246103 2230525 1,208.22 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008097 246104 2237894 281.51 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008028 246105 2239906 3,459.11 339318 9/23/2010 124422 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING INC. 275.00 245744 8301069 275.00 339319 9123/2010 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 183.91 DAIRY 245875 090910 183.91 339320 9/2312010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 80.00 245745 569229 1,814.50 245746 568890 53.10 245747 569216 89.60 245748 568892 2,914.17 245749 568891 1,949.75 246054 568889 35.40 246055 569217 6.936.52 339321 9123/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 60.45 BIT SET, TORX SET, DRIVE 00001580 245693 511665 60.45 339322 9/23/2010 118189 DEM -CON LANDFILL LLC 177.00 CONST. DEMO - LINED 00001408 245876 02- 264034.5 177.00 339323 9/2' 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 1646.6406 5421.6511 5630.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 5862.5514 5421.5510 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 10 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1553.6556 TOOLS 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GRILL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 11 912312010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 63.98 BAKERY 245877 344081 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 80.38 BAKERY 245878 344080 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 41.85 BAKERY 245879 344463 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 186.21 339324 - 9/23/2010 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 250.00 AERATION PERMIT FEE 00001624 245979 F0903012 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 250.00 339326 9/2312010 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 250.00 AERATION PERMIT FEE 00001625 245980 F0903072 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 250.00 339326 9123/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 559.06 245981 110311893 -9/10 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 139.40 246106 650487671 -9/10 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 698.46 339327 9/23/2010 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 245585 26234 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 245585 26234 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 245585 26234 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,050.00 339328 9123/2010 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 58.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 207830 031709 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 58.50 339329 9/23/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 6,522.74 CHEMICALS 00001215 245645 82701410 -10 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 120.15- CREDIT 246080 C82700060 -10 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 6,402.59 339330 9123/2010 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE.WINLECTRIC CO. 107.84 LKG PLUG 00001551 245880 07420700 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 107:84 339331 9/23/2010 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 187.44 AUG WASHES 245881 4359 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 187.44 339332 9/23/2010 106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 12 9/23/2010 = 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,430.00 CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS/ ART FAIR 245982 091510 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 1,430.00 339333 912312010 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 1,348.92 ARTS IN THE PARK PROCEEDS 245983 092010 5840.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,348.92 339334 9/2312010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 41.50 BEER 245882 120 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 41.50 339336 9/23/2010 105906 EGAN SERVICE 6,800.00 FIBER INSTALLATION 00004338 246097 JC10045442 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT,REPLACEMENT PWBUILDING 6,800.00 339336 9123/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 1,282.50 TIF CALCULATIONS - CENT LKS 245646 341908 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA. GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1,282.50 339337 912312010 126805 ELECTRONIC CENTER 28.23 OUTLET STRIP 00001675 245647 698894 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 28.23 339338 9/2312010 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,167.08 CB GRATES 00001221 245648 NN3768 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 10,302.75 MH RINGS, LIDS 00001221 245649 NN3782 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,428.55 MH RISERS 00001709 245984 NN3953 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES' COLLECTION SYSTEMS 14,898.38 339339 9/2312010 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 75.00 ROW ACQUISITION 245694 00 -9993 07048.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SO48 SIDEWALK 100 W FRONTAGE R 225.00 ROW ACQUISITION 245695 00 -10014 07048.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SO48 SIDEWALK 100 W FRONTAGE R 300.00 339340 9123/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 63.03 FILTER ELEMENTS 00005121 245696 69- 020504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.03 339341 9/23/2010 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 12.07 PHOTOS 08326063 245883 T2- 293312 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 12.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 -9123/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv. No Account No Subledger Account Description 339342 9123/2010 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 3,603.95 TURNOUT GEAR 00003768 245985 6737 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 3,603.95 339343 912312010 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. - 425.00 ROWAY 245697 20052 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 339344 9123/2010 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY - 71.97 PADLOCKS 00001679 245698 213712 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.97 339345` . 9/23/2010 101475 FOOTJOY 89.82 JACKET 245986 3346209 5440:5511 COST OF GOODS ='PRO SHOP 53.65 SHOES 245987 3352142 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP 143.47 339346'- 9123/2010 125450 FRIENDS OF FIRKIN LLC 400.58 245750 EDI003 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 400.58 339347 9/2312010 115314- GALAXY COMPUTER INC. 298.18.- MAINTENANCE KIT FOR PRINTER' 00004364 245650 5817 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 298.18. 339348 912312010 106508 GEMPLER'S INC. - 117.31 BOOT SCRAPERS & BRUSHS. 00001559 245699.: 1015960882 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 219.39 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00001596't245884> '1016025587 1640.6201 LAUNDRY 336.70 339349 9/23/2010 119936 GLOBAL OAK 37.50 EP E- COMMERCE 245885 010732 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75.00 PARK & REC E- COMMERCE 245885 010732 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 487.50 ART CTR &COMMERCE 245885 010732 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, . 2,493.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 245885 010732 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 3,093.75 339360 9/2312010 101103 GRAINGER 7.75 HEX NUTS 00001708 245701 9344779187 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.56 BRAKE CLEANER, WASHERS 00001708 245703 9344690418 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,115.78 SHELVING FOR PW BLDG 00001599 245886 9339373467 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 815.93 STORAGE RACKS 00001599 245887 9339373459 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/2212010 8:57:16 Page - 13 Business Unit _ FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES YORK SELLING CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/23/2010 — 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,989.02 339351 9/2312010 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING - OCT 245888 21154 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 339362 9123/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 354.75 245751 122229 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 240.75 245752 122228 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 595.50 339363 9123/2010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 58.98 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001677 245651 949718696 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 99.05 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001677 245652 949718697 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 158.03 339364 9123/2010 124336 GREER, ROBIN 318.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 212657 052609 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 318.50 339356 9/23/2010 100790 HACH COMPANY 203.25 CHLORINE REAGENTS 00001542 245653 6894975 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 203.25 339356 912312010 126270 HARTFORD 15.80 COBRA INSURANCE 245988 COBRA -10/10 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 15.80 339357 9/2312010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 5,293.50 TONKAZORB 00001216 245702 3156736 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5,293.50 339358 9/2312010 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 182,837.23 PREMIUM 245889 35706025 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 27,072.01 PREMIUM 245890 35705659 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 209,909.24 339369 912312010 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA 44.00 PIZZA 245891 1705696 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.00 339360 912 ?" -10 101209 HEIMARK FOODS R55CKREG LOG20000 829.50 CITY OF EDINA 245753 533796 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 1,850.85 245754 534509 9/23/2010 —9/23/2010 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 234.24 'MEAT PATTIES 245892 022696 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 534508 5862.5514 234.24 VERNON SELLING 3;640.10 339361 9/23/2010 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 339364 9/23/2010 1,686.80 RADIO ADMIN FEE 245893 21088016 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1,686.80 352.32 IMPOUNDS 245894 14114 -9/10 339362 9/23/2010 ANIMAL CONTROL 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 352.32 2,256.14 PCS, LAPTOPS & MONITORS 00004363 245716 48225928 4402.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 127257 HUGHES, ASHLEY 2,289.27 PCS, LAPTOPS & MONITORS 00004363 245717 48228790 4402.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 4,545.41 FALL CLASS REFUND 245989 091610 5511.6136 339363 9/23/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 98.00 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 15 Business Unit GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PW BUILDING PW BUILDING 829.50 245753 533796 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,850.85 245754 534509 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 366.25 245755 534457 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 593.50 246056 534508 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3;640.10 339364 9/23/2010 101618 HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL 352.32 IMPOUNDS 245894 14114 -9/10 1450.6217 KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL CONTROL 352.32 339366 9/23/2010 127257 HUGHES, ASHLEY 98.00 FALL CLASS REFUND 245989 091610 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 98.00 339366 9/2312010 100812 M1AO 200.00 MEMBERSHIP - ADRIENNE GARCIA 246081 092010 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 200.00 339367 9/2312010 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 575.00 INTOX ASIV 245895 312503 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 575.00 339368 9/23/2010 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 103.18 DOG FENCE REPAIR 245990 134191 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 103.18 339369 9/23/2010 127243 JACK PIXLEY SWEEPS INC. 122.60 PERMIT REFUND 245600 ED102329 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 122.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 1 16 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339370 9/2312010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,401.21 245756 1423589 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.65 245757 1423590 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,809.85 245758 1423540 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 67.50 245759 1421486 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 732.60 245760 1423584 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST.SELLING 1,789.37 245761 1423576 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 56TH ST'SELLING 3,723.50 246057, 1423578 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12,588.68 339371 912312010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO 22.59 PLASTIC PITCHER, GLOVES 00001669 245654 55741727 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.59 339373 9123/2010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 535.38 245762 1909651 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD-LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,569.92 245763 1909650 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,129.63 245764 1909647 5862:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.11 245765 1909648 = 5862:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 245766 1909635 5862.5513- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,012.17 245767 1909652 5862.5513' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 245768 1969649 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,020.04 245769 1909646 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,715.79 245770 1909653 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 161.57 245771 1909632 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 323.36 245772 1909627 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 492.52 245773 1909631 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,529.04 245774 1909630 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,512.64 245775 1909629 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 151.01 245776 1909628 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,684.22 245777 1909644 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.37 245778 1909645 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,607.36 245779 1909641 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 245780 1909639 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,234.70 245781 1909636 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS:SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,092.00 245782 1899621 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,188.10 245783 1905947 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 32.40- 245784 470724 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,079.06 246658 1909633 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 44.22 246059 1909638 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,660.65 246060 1909640 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 339374 9/2312010 9/23/2010 -9123/2010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1.12 246061 1909634 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,782.30 246062 1909637 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 4639.87 246063 1909642 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CRAFT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GOLF SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS CUSTOMER REFUND 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 17 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO SENIOR CITIZENS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER - -. CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESS 10NAL'SERVICES GOLF PROF SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS 44,195.11 339374 9/2312010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 79.16 TEXTBOOKS 245991 091510 5125.6564 113.53 MINI AUDIO MIXER 245991 091510 5125.6710 192.69 339375 9/2312010 127251 - JOHNSON, RICHARD 95.80 FLOWERS FOR GOLF BANQUET 245993 091410 1628.6406.02 95.80 339376 9/23/2010 121676 JOHNSTON, RICHARD & SUE 1,076.41 IRRIGATION REPAIR 245992 091410 01214.1705.20 1,076.41 339377 9123/2010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 199.68 UNIFORMS 00003777 245994 148521 1470.6558 102.57 UNIFORMS 00003771 245995 146294 -04 1470.6558 613.94 UNIFORMS 00003781 245996 147347 -02 1470.6558 539.96 UNIFORMS 00003780 245997 147290 -01 1470.6558 69.28 UNIFORMS 00003771 245998 146294 -05 1470.6558 1,525.43 339378 9123/2010 127255 KEMME, MARILYN & K JOHN 25:95 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 245999 091310 5900.2015 25.95 339379 912312010 126953 KIMM, RYAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 9/23/10 246001 091610 5631.6136 100.00 339380 9123/2010 127245 KLEVE COMPANIES INC. 301.00 A/C 'REPAIRS 00001622 245655 120690S 1646.6103 1,026.00 CONTRACT A/C WORK 00001629 245896 120738A 1646.6103 1,327.00 339381 9/23/2010 106421. KNIGHTS FRATERNAL CORP OF BLOO 599.48 SENIOR GOLF BANQUET 245656 1512 1628.6103.02 599.48 CRAFT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GOLF SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS CUSTOMER REFUND 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 17 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO SENIOR CITIZENS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER - -. CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESS 10NAL'SERVICES GOLF PROF SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA " Council Check Register 9/23/2010 —9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description '339382 9123/2010 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 204.89 PETTY CASH 246000 091710 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 204.69 339383 9/23/2010 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 1,806,13 BATTERY PACKS 245897 425564 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,806.13 339384 9/23/2010 124611 LARSCO INC. 1,215.28 PUMP REBUILD KITS 00001535 245657 2700 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,215.28 339385 9/23/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 358.68 HOSE CLAMPS. UTILITY ROLLS 00005140 245704 9574061 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 375.29 WASHERS 00001663 245705 9570101 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 733.97 339386 9123/2010 113952 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. 703.31 SURVEY SOFTWARE, CD ROM 00005713 246002 92792987 1260.6577 LUMBER 703.31 339387 912312010 100558 LIND ELECTRONICS INC. 199.80 ADAPTER 00003135 245898 250393 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 199.80 - 339388 9/2312010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,181.89 246064 94371 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,546.66 246065 92944 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX - 2,728.55 339389 9123/2010 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 126.38 SOD, DIRT, MULCH 246003 083110 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 179.55 SOD, DIRT, MULCH 246003 083110 5630.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 236.74 SOD, DIRT, MULCH 246003 083110 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,088.03 SOD, DIRT, MULCH 246003 083110 .1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,630.70 339390 9/23/2010 118819 MASTER SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 928.31 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246004 18721 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 928.31 912212010 8:57:16 Page- 18 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION DWI FORFEITURE WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET NAME SIGNS ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 9123/2010 - 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339391 9/23/2010 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 625.22 PHONE CHANGES 246085 56361 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 67.50 PHONE CHANGES 246086 56347 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 192.38 PHONE CHANGES 246087 56863 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 885.10 339392 9/23/2010 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 100.00 ENTERTAINMENT 9/30/10 246005 091710 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 339393 9/23/2010 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 66.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 245586 090110 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 66.00 339394 9/2312010 123847 MEDICA 1,420.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 246006 R KANSANBACK 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,420.00 339395 9/23/2010 103232 MEHA 40.00 CONFERENCE - S. WILMOT 246007 2010 CONF 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 40.00 339396 9/2312010 102281 MENARDS 70.47 WOOD 00001684 245587 88251 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 64.00 SPRAY 00006068 245899. 60542 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 134.47 339397 9/2312010 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 170.84 FIELD PAINT 00001597 245900 126811 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 29.87 CHAINS & DOWNS MARKERS 245901 127080 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 200.71 339398 9/23/2010 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 37,422.00 SAC FOR AUGUST 2010 246100 091310 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 37,422.00 339399 9/23/2010 127271 MICHELS COMMUNICATIONS 35,042.50 2010 FIBER EXTENSION 246102 1912 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 35,042.50 339400 9/23/2010 104650 MICRO CENTER 48.07 SUPPLIES FOR UTILITY BILLING 00004211 245706 2920636 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 20 9/2312010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 32.05 KEYBOARD 00004365 245707 2931632 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 80.12 339401 9123/2010 127263 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 393.30 SHELVING SYSTEM 00001035 246008 713758 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 1,085.85 SHELVING SYSTEM 00001035 246008 713758 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 2,488.05 SHELVING SYSTEM 00001035 246008 713758 421600.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARKS ADMIN EQUIPMENT 935.16 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 1,433.45 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 4,062.53 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 4,201.68 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 6,768.65 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 7,153.68 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 8,332.72 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 30,911.99 SHELVING 00001033 246088 713757 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 67,767.06 339402 9123/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 2,567.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 246091 091510 05492.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -492 PAMELA PARK 3,634.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 246091 091510 03449.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-449 PAMELA PARK 114,400.90 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 246091 091510 04358.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -358 PAMELA PARK 157,830.94 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 246091 091510 01360.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 278,433.12 339403 9/23/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 142.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 05497.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -497 BROR RD WATERMAIN 394.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 03455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-455 BROR RD SANITARY 855.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 05498.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -498 MOCCASIN VALLEY WATERMA 1,182.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 03456.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS -456 MOCCASIN VALLEY SANITAR 1,434.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 08056.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -56 MOCCASIN VALLEY RD 1,516.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 04368.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -368 MOCCASIN VALLEY STORM 4,099.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 05489.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -489 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 6,772.31 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 04367.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -367 BROR RD STORM 14,615.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 01375.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION 18,035.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 01376.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -376 MOCCASIN VAL RD RECON 20,152.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 03447.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-447 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 28,646.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 04354.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -354 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 37,192.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 08054.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -54 BRAEMAR HILLS LIGHTING 253,426.04 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246092 092410 01359.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 388,464.81 339404 9/27 102873 MILLER, SUSAN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 231.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246009 091710 5621.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 231.50 339406 9/2312010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 53.00 CO2 TANK 246010 989648 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 53.00 339406 912312010 117724 MINNEAPOLIS /ST PAUL BUSINESS J 153.95 3 YR SUBSCRIPTION 245601 9102889 -9/10 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 153.95 339407 9123/2010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 3,433.36 CRS II 00001212 245708 61762 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 3,433.36 339408 9123/2010 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 28.05 NAME PLATES 245902 00004 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.05 339409 9/23/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 332.13 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001588 245903 0086232 -IN 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 332.13 339410 9/2312010 126997 MISSION ELECTRIC LLC 969.00 FOUNTAIN TRANSFORMER REPAIR 245588 082710 - BRAEMAR 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 969.00 339411 9123/2610 124912 MMC-INC. 50.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 246011 091610 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE 50.00 339412 9/23/2010 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR &INDUS 40.00 ELECTRICAL PERMITS - PW BLDG 246012 090410 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 42.00 ELECTRICAL PERMITS - PW BLDG 246012 090410 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES -77.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT-ALDEN PK 246013 090810 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT- CITY HALL 246014 091010 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 203.00 339413 9/23/2010 127268 MORTON, PATRICIA 50.00 GIFT CERTIFICATES REFUND 246015 091610 2200.2071 DEFERRED REVENUE - 50.00 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page.- 21 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PSTF FIRE TOWER COMMUNICATIONS STREET RENOVATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 - 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339414 9/23/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 78.10 CONTROLLER _ 00001666 245904 757040 -00 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 49.17 PUMP FOR FIELDS 00001666 245905 757065 -00 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 207.26 MUFFLER ASSEMBLY, GAUGE 00002379 246016 758482 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 334.53 339416 9/23/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 300.50 245785 61743 5862.5513 COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE 603.50 246066 61744 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 904.00 339416 9/23/2010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2,500.29 SIGNS FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001182 245906 TI- 0224818 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,500.29 339417 9/23/2010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 595.26 LIGHTS 00005105 245709 25141 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 595.26 339418 9/23/2010 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 950.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246093 092410 05494.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 28,291.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246093 092410 03451.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 69,203.76 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246093 092410 04360.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 197,089.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 246093 092410 01362.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 295,534.55 339419 9/23/2010 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 44,276.56 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 246094 092110 01379.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 44,276.56 339420 9/23/2010 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 36.21 PAPER 00006034 245907 1255327090 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.21 339421 9/23/2010 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 365.06 245908 W10086613 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 22.80 245909 W10080607 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 22.80 245909 W10080607 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 45.60 245909 W10080607 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 45.60 245909 W10080607 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 68.40 245909 W10080607 5861.6188, TELEPHONE 82.60 245909 W10080607 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 9/2212010 8:57:16 Page - 22 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING -.WM -494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS SS-451 PARKWOOD KNOLLS STS -360 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -379 44TH ST BRKSIDEBTHIELEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT VERNON OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATIOV R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE ' YORK SELLING - 339422 Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING: 104163 ORECK CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 9/23/2010 - 9/23/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 91.20 245909 W10080607 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 91.20 245909 W10080607 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 114.00 245909 W10080607 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 118.93 245909 W10080607 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 136.80 245909 W10080607 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 155.27 245909 - W10080607 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 204.14 245909 W10080607 5631.6188. TELEPHONE 204.14 245909 W10080607 5621.6188 TELEPHONE 319.20 245909 W10080607 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/22/2010 8:57:16. Page - 23 Business Unit YORK FIRE STATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING' MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME PROGRAM CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SKATING & HOCKEY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1551.6180 CONTRACTED'REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR 2;087.74 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE ' YORK SELLING - 339422 9/23/2010 50TH ST SELLING: 104163 ORECK CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 'YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 182.32 VACUUM CLEANER 00001620 245658 17781129 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 182.32 339423 9/23/2010: 101659, ORKIN PEST CONTROL 119:40 PEST CONTROL 245659 57541612 119.40 339424 9123/2010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 134.23 COOKIES 245910 80165638 134.23 339426 9123/2010 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 962.50 SERVICE CONTRACT 00006107 246017 36232 962.50 339426 912312010 .100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,807.57 245786 8273903 -IN 643.00 245787 8274183 -IN 488.00 245788 8274692 -IN 1,187.75 245789 8274693 -IN 1,602.50 245790 8274185 -IN ` 1,335.96 245791 8274691 -IN 33.25 246067 8273579 -IN . 7,098.03 339427 9/23/2010 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,144.01- 245911 64001653 427.16 245934 63867561 1,041.01 245935 63867598 324.16 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/22/2010 8:57:16. Page - 23 Business Unit YORK FIRE STATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING' MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME PROGRAM CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SKATING & HOCKEY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1551.6180 CONTRACTED'REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE ' YORK SELLING - 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING: 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 'YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE VERNON'SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 24 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339428 9/2312010 127253 PERBIX, MIKE 100.00 LICENSE FEE REFUND 246018 091410 1490.4171 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEALTH 100.00 339429 9/2312010 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,285.00 INSTALL NEW IRRIGATION 245710 70 05506.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 1,285.00 339430 9123/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,549.98 245792 2963175 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,978.16 245793 2963173 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 646.73 245794 2963169 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 681.26 245795 2963171 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 205.01 245796 2963177 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 660.83 245797 2963174 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 49.12 245798 2963172 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,447.94 245799 2963178 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 2,361.32 245800 2963176 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.OD- 245801 3444072 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.92- 245802 3444073 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 205.51 246068 2963170 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10,770.94 339431 9123/2010 100119 PING 104.13 GOLF CLUBS 246019 10364098 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 592.52 GOLF CLUBS 246020 10371890 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 696.65 339432 9/23/2010 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 34.52 RIM STUDS 00005112 246021 1- 977693 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.52 339433 9/2312010 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 3,553.31 FIELD MIX DELIVERED 00001111 245660 35285 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 3,553.31 339434 9/23/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 102.10 DISMOUNT /MOUNTS, TRUCK VALV ®005120 245711 814441 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.75 TIRES , 00005120 245712 813998 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 363.94 TIRES, DISPOSAL FEE 00005120 245713 814433 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,496.87 TIRES 00001423 246022 782568 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPEr -IN GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON,SELLING Council Check Register 9/23/2010 VERNON SELLING 127246 PREMIER ONE BLINDS 9/23/2010 -9123/2010 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # , Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,075.66 081210 5822.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 339435 9123/2010 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 64.13 FEE FOR GPRS 246098. 300782 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.13 . FEE FOR GPRS 246099 300875 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 9/2212010 8:57:16 Page - 25 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 128.26 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON,SELLING 339436 9/23/2010 VERNON SELLING 127246 PREMIER ONE BLINDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,200.00 BLINDS 00005887 245914 081210 5822.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,200.00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 339437 912312010 VERNON SELLING 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 2,950.00 RADON STUDY 00001710 245589 10010.07 2,950.00 339438 9/23/2010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 597.23 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002384 246023 4934 - 597.23 339439 9/23/2010 104455 PUPPE, RICHARD 94.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 246024 091510 94.00 339440 9/23/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 3,086.60 245804 355870 -00 1,962.00 245805 355927 -00 103.20 245806 355872 -00 212.97 245808 355829 -00 1,455.24 245809 355926 -00 516.40 245810 355928 -00 217.82 245811 355830 -00 3,259.79 245812 355862 -00 460.00 245813 355863 -00 11,274.02 339441 9123/2010 123898 QWEST 200.40 952 835 -6661 245590 6661 -9/10 151.33 952 285 -2951 246025 2951 -9/10 57.58 952 944 -1841 246026 1841 -9/10 409.31 339442 912312010 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 9/2212010 8:57:16 Page - 25 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON,SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 1646.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY-OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 26 9/23/2010 . -9123/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 17,684.00 INSTALL 2001 DC FWS SIREN 00003084 245915 95187 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 17,684.00 339443 9/23/2010 106036 REITER, JERRY 45.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 246027 091710 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.96 339444 9/23/2010 119864 RHINO , 405.00 MARKING POSTS 00001530 245714 35844 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 405.00 339446 9/23/2010 106631 RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY 450.25 BUS TO CHANHASSEN THEATER 245661 2722 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 450.25 339446 9/23/2010 118779 ROGGEMAN, ERIC 4.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246028 091510 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 46.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 246028 091510 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 50.71 339447 9/23/2010 101963 S & S,SPECIALISTS 1,555.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00001623 245662 43557 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 705.38 OAK WILT INJECTION 00001633 245916 43751 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,260.38 - 339448 9/23/2010 126409 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.' 89,791.36 OFFICE FURNITURE 00001205 246101 EG7239/7241 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 89,791.36. 339449 912312010 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 43.12 BAKERY 245917 291940 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.12 339450 9/2312010 117807 SAM'S CLUB 21.20 SAFETY FACILITY SUPPLIES 246029 090710 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 86.83 SAFETY FACILITY SUPPLIES 246029 090710 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 192.29 SAFETY FACILITY SUPPLIES 246029 090710 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 300.32 339451 9/23/2010 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 348.79 BADGE REELS 245602 SH1072 2210.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 348.79 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 —9/23/2010- Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339452 9/23/2010 118168 SANSIO 53.44 EMS FAXING 246030 INVO18497 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING 761.61 EM&PROGRAM 246031 INVO18618 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5900.2015 5932.6103 CLbYAifto] 5511.6406 1640.6201 1550.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 1554.6230 01362.1705.20 1301.6201 CUSTOMER REFUND 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 27 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CONSULTING DESIGN LAUNDRY BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 815.05 339453 9/23/2010 127248 SCHMOKER, WILLIAM 15.97 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 246032 091510 15.97 339454 9/2312010 100995 SEH 47,223.21 STORM /SIGN INVENTORY 246095 ' 234801 47,223.21 339455 912312010 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 2,126.81 PW BLDG SIGN 245918 41441 2,126.81 339456 9/23/2010 120458 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CDR 469.42 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 00008010 245715 3162080 - 469.42 339457 9/23/2010 116501 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 61.45 UNIFORM PURCHASE 246033 091510 61.45 339458 9/23/2010 101000 SIR SPEEDY . 46.44 BUSINESS CARDS 245591 66112 46.44 BUSINESS CARDS .245592 66122 46.44 BUSINESS CARDS 245593 66125 139.32' 339469 9/2312010 -. 124769. 'SISTERMAN, MATT 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 245919 091610 51.10 339460 9/2312010 119910 SKRABA IRRIGATION LLC 929.70 SPRINKLER REPAIR 245920 1464 929.70 339461 9/23/2010 105739 SNAZA, DAVID 119.96. UNIFORM PURCHASE 246034 091710 5900.2015 5932.6103 CLbYAifto] 5511.6406 1640.6201 1550.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 1554.6230 01362.1705.20 1301.6201 CUSTOMER REFUND 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 27 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CONSULTING DESIGN LAUNDRY BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF,EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 - 9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 119.96 339462 912312010 122368. SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 1,115.00 TRAINING 245921 8454 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,115.00 339463 9/23/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 195.27 COPPER TUBE, CUTTER 00001417. 245922 S2248014.001 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 16.43 PVC CAP 00001715 246035 S2259302.001 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 211.70 339464 9/23/2010 102261 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 164.52 GOLF PENCILS 00006105 245923 0000624957, 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 164.52 339465 9123/2010 110976 STAGES.THEATRE CO. 39.80 DEPOSIT FOR 12/5/10 PERFORM 246082 63777 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.80 339466 9/23/2010 100650 STANLEY SECURITY- SOLUTIONS INC 131.21 KEY CORED -245924 CH- 540965 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 131.21 339467 912312010 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3,403.59 CARTRIDGES 245663 104230027 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,403.59 339468 9/2312010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 34.55 F- MODULE 00001069 245664 250183 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 124.94 HOSE 00005107 245665 261276 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - 159.49 339469 9/2312010 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 41.33 380007460384 PHONE LISTING 245594 090410 5821.6188 TELEPHONE . 41.33. 380007460384 PHONE LISTING 245594 090410 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 41.34 380007460384 PHONE LISTING 245594 090410 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 124.00 339470 9/23/2010 126211 SUPERIOR CRANE CORP. 50,587.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 245925 091010 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50, 587.50 7 Y _ 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 28 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PW BUILDING GENERAL STORM SEWER GOLF ADMINISTRATION PLAYGROUND'& THEATER ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST-OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 29 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339471 9/23/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 878.00 245814 00879 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 878.00 339472 9/23/2010 127264 SZARZYNSKI, JOE 48.17 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 246036 091610 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 48.17 339473 912312010 120596 T- MOBILE 42.66 SURVEY PHONE 477067848 245718 082710 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 42.66 339474 9123/2010 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 245926 893389 "5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 38.00 339475 9/23/2010 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMP 281.08 TENNANT FRAME 00005108 245719 900920166 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 281.08 339476 9/2312010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 318.46 BULBS, LAMPS 00005104 245720 81423 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 318.46 339477 9/23/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 466.50 245815 607712 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,203.10 245816 607509 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 140.55 245817 607510 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 109.00 245927 00772448 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,729.10 246069 608490 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 32.40 246070 608491 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,680.65 339478 9123/2010 101474 TITLEIST 1,311.66 GOLF BALLS 246037 1943553 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,311.66 339479 9/23/2010 127266 TORGERSON, SCOTT 920.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 246038 091710 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 920.00 339480 9123/2010 101042 TRIARCO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 41.31 TIE DYE KITS 246039 924867 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6406 41.31 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1470.6579 339481 9/23/2010 1470.6406 100363 U.S. BANK 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1470.6406 49.98 TIRE GEL 246040 091610 DEPT UNIFORMS 152.80 TEXTBOOKS 246040 091610 1470.6104 179.58 SUPPLIES - HOME DEPOT 246040 091610 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 187.46 HUDSON MAP BOOKS 246040 091610 5913.6406 210.03 ROOM RESERVATION 246040 091610 330.32 PELICAN LIGHTS - BRIGHT GUY 246040 091610 365.77 HI -VIS JACKETS - GEMPLERS 246040 091610 483.55 UNIFORM SOCKS -JC PENNEY 246040 091610 575.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 246040 091610 632.72 DISHWASHER 246040 091610 770.28 TUITION - SCHEERER 246040 091610 898.90 CHEMICAL MIXERS 246040 091610 4,836.39 339482 9/23/2010 116379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 245666 090210 78.20 INTERNET 245666 090210 41.68 SUPPLIES 245667 SEPT210 115.54 SUPPLIES 245667 SEPT210 166.60 SUPPLIES 245667 SEPT210 419.92 339483 9/23/2010 120676 ULTRAMAX 459.00 AMMO 245928 115447 459.00 339484 9/23/2010 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,197.60 CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN 245929 092846 1,197.60 339486 912312010 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 209.69 MMI SHIPPING 00001713 245721 091410 209.69 339486 912312010 100668 URS CORPORATION 10,890.00 PROMENADE CONSTRUCTION 246041 4436793 10,890.00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1460.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 30 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING RESERVE PROGRAM CIVILIAN DEFENSE METER REPAIR GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/2212010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page - 31 9/23/2010 — 9123/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339487 9/2312010 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.26 PAGER 245668 T60960831 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 299.83 PAGERS 245930 T03192461 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 313.09 339488 .9/23/2010 122654 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 173.49 OXYGEN 00003649 246042 430856 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 173.49 339489 912312010 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 37,175.30 WM 506 PROJECT 245931 15637 05506.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 37,175.30 339490 9123/2010 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 559.12 CAN LINERS 00001603 245669 172528 -00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 979.23 LINERS, CUPS, TOWELS 245932 171925 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,538.35 339491 9/23/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 108.50 245818 0029431 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108.50 245819 0029430 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF'GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 217.00 339492 9/23/2010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 82.59 ELEVATOR BULBS 245670 15158677 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 82.59 339493 9/23/2010 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 267.19• KEYS 00005150 245722 0041670 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 267.19 339494 9123/2010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 1,508.73 IAAOCONFERENCE EXPENSES 246083 092010 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 1,508.73 339495 9/23/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 152.20 245820 251205 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,049.50 245821 251208 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,968.84 246071 251213 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,170.54 339496 912312010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 CounciLCheck Register Page - 32 9/23/2010 -9/23/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 592.96 245822 332156 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 645.60 245823 332158 5862.5513° COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 707.84 245824 332160 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.00- 245825 49968 5622.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.00- 245826 49969 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9.00- 245827 50009 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,141.60 246072 332159 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230.89 246073 332157 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.00 246074 326360BALDUE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE 50TH ST SELLING 21.00 246075 324774BALDUE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE 50TH ST SELLING 7,291.89 339497 912312010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 6,430.23 245828 456755 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 17,190.33 245829 457268 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 64.40 245830. 456761 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 365.60 245831 455023 5862.5512 COST OF'GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,421.11 245832 453060 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,059.81 245833 456760 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 905.02 245834 455024 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,312.32 245835 456754 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 192.00- 245836 609155 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 49.29 246076 453061 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 21.39 246077 456756 5862.5515 COST-OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 44,627.50 339498 9/23/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,333.60 245837 657178 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 245838 657180 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.00 245839 657179 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 421.75 245840 658522 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,176.70 245841 654531 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,308.22 245842 656360 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 124.00 245843 656637 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,378.65 245844 656636 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,208.76 246078 659160 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,066.00 246079 658942 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15,142.18 339499 912312010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,099.50 245845 254291 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE VERNON SELLING 287.00 245846 254293 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Council Check Register Page 33 9/23/2010 - 9123/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Irry No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 473.75 245847 254292 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1 86025 339500 912312010 106740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 58,929.07 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE 4,926.50 70TH ST FINAL DESIGN 245723 7- 01686 -160 01367.1705.20 938.00 TRAFFIC ENG REVIEW 245724 31- 01686 -020 1260.6103 5,864.50 116.84 AUG USAGE 339501 912312010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 049985481 350.45 5113197645 -8 245595 .252790233 1322.6185 5,155.32 51- 5888961 -7 245596 252820444 1375.6185 35,854.13 51- 5605640 -1 245603 252994381 5911.6185 - 6,156.42 51- 6121102 -5 245671 252645936 1646.6185 3,427.20 51- 5619094 -8 245725 252815024 1552.6185 7,985.55 51- 6824328 -7 246084 252659210 5420.6185 CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER" LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARKING RAMP WELL PUMPS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 58,929.07 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 339502 9/2312010 GASOLINE 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 116.84 AUG USAGE 00009174 245672 049985481 116.84 - 339503 9/2312010 103684 XPEDX 5.30 ABOUT TOWN PAPER DELIVERY 245933 9012152607 5.30 339504 9/23/2010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 597.08 GAS 00006404 245597 .'992271 14,234.43 FUEL 00001010 245673 400114 14,831.51 339505 9123/2010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 82.50 245848 '9768 82.50 339506 9/23/2010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE , 158.45 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008025 :245726 54066223 158.45 339507 9/23/2010 101091 ZIEGLER INC CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER" LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARKING RAMP WELL PUMPS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 245674 E6395918- 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 286.08 GENERATOR REPAIRS 245675 PCO01221256 1551.6180 CONTRACTED'REPAIRS CITY HALL°GENERAL 736.08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 —9/2312010 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check# Date. Amount Supplier/ Explanation 339608 9/23/2010 126270 HARTFORD 4,997.74 PREMIUM 4,997.74 2,344,711.66 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/23/2010 —9/23/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 999 5043374 -7 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 2,344,711.66 Total Payments 2,344,711.66 9/22/2010 8:57:16 Page - 35 Business Unit PAYROLL CLEARING R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY-OF EDINA Council Cfieck'Summary 9/23/2010 - 9123/2010 Company Amount ' 01000 GENERAL FUND 481,324.70 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 4,596.31 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,882.63 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 950,489.09 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 77,118.34 05100 'ART CENTER FUND 3,265.67 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,226.22 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,727.17 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 96,244.63 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 12,853.22 _ 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 45,615.40 05800 LIQUOR FUND 198,336.57 05900 UTILITY-FUND 187,170.15 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 269,615.23 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,248.59 09900 PAYROLL FUND 4,997.74 Report Totals 2,344,711.66 We confirm to the best of our Idi& ledge and belief, that these claims comply in'all material respects . with °the requirements of the MY of Edina-, purchasing poll 'es and .. procedures to s Finan irector ty 11�anager R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 1 9/30/2010 —9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339509 913.0/2010 127292 A+ OUTDOOR SERVICES INC. 796.55 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246406 29546 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA-362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 796.55 339610 9/30/2010 125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 103.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246483 092410 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 103.50 339511 9/30/2010 162971 ACE ICE COMPANY 21.00 246188 0807597 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 43.00 246532 0724612 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.40 246533 0724611 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 111.40 339512 9/30/2010 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 34.74 ALARM MONITORING 246407 31947270 5111.6250 Z. ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 34.74 339513 9/3012010 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 1,063.25 COUPLERS 00003807 246408 18642 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,063.25 339514 9/30/2010 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 1,612.34 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 246484 7134 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,612.34 339515 9/30/2010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 528.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246383 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 528.00 339616 9/30/2010 127114 ALTERNATIVE' BUSINESS FURNITURE 288.56 FILE CABINET 246409 36743 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 288.56 339517 9/30/2010 102214 AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION 450.00 POOL REPAIRS 246485 10648 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 450.00 339518 9/30/2010 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 576.00 GIFT SHOP WORK 246384 092410 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 576.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 BATTERY 00005162 246325 020 - 208239 CITY OF EDINA REPAIRRARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 144.67 BATTERIES 246487 018- 210095 Council Check Register GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.20 BATTERIES 00001707 246488 018 - 212584 9/30/2010 -9130/2010 SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339519 9/30/2010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 649.18 246189 54868200 787.50 FOOD 246232 1426085 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 54868000 5842.5515 787.50 YORK SELLING 21.50 246191 54873500 339620 9/3012010 50TH ST SELLING 103066 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 246192 54873600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 565.08 IRRIGATION REPAIR 246410 35144 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN VERNON SELLING 12.85 328.12 IRRIGATON REPAIR 246411 35135 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 247.52 154.89 IRRIGATION REPAIR 246412 35138 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 246196 1,048.09 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 647.50 339621- 913012010 5842.5512 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. YORK SELLING 342.30 246534 54980000 5822.5513 21.79 GUTTER INSERTS 246486 36380 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES_ 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 21.79 34.46 246536 84231500 5822.5515 339522 913012010 6.30 106016 ATHLETICA INC. 246537 84231400 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 3,381.79 75.99 GOAL PADS 00008029 246107 0031519 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 339526 9/30/2010 75.99 339523 9/30/2010 246489 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GEC' 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 2, . Business. Unit UKILL BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD BA-359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD POOL OPERATION ARENA ICE MAINT 51.29 BATTERY 00005162 246325 020 - 208239 1553.6530 REPAIRRARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 144.67 BATTERIES 246487 018- 210095 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.20 BATTERIES 00001707 246488 018 - 212584 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 246.16 339624 9/30/2010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 649.18 246189 54868200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.00 246190 54868000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX .. YORK SELLING 21.50 246191 54873500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 260.20 246192 54873600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 897.25 246193 54871400 5862:5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR,. VERNON SELLING 12.85 246194 84201900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 247.52 246195 84200600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.68 246196 84200700 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 647.50 246267 87 541300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 342.30 246534 54980000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186.05 246535 54991900 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .50TH ST SELLING 34.46 246536 84231500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6.30 246537 84231400 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 3,381.79 339526 9/30/2010 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 74.86 UNIFORM PURCHASE 246489 092010 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GEC' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/30/2010 -9130/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 74.86 339526 913012010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 47.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 246108 WO- 644123 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 280.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003137 246109 W0-644390 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 26.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 246490 OE- 236215 -1 5820.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 354.26 339527 9130/2010 101676 BIFFS INC 829.19 TOILET SERVICE FOR FESTIVAL 00002389 246413 W416026 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 829.19 339628 9/30/2010 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246385 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 339529 9/3012010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 1.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 246110 62765 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 246110 62765 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 241.71 CLOCK PAPER 00001437 246111 62707 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - CENT SVC PW BUILDING 26.24- RETURN 246112 4676CM 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 246326 61769 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 333.98 339530 9/30/2010 124812 BNR IRRIGATION SERVICES INC. 114.99 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246414 67634 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 114.99 . 339531 9/3012010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 181.74 COVER 00005113 246113 440562 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 181.74 339532 9/30/2010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 379.50 MATERIALS TESTING 246327 323836 04362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN STS -362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC 379.50 339533 9/30/2010 120561 BRETSON, KAREN - 41.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246415 092410 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 41.00 339534 9/30/2010 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 69.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246386 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 339536 913012010 Amount Supplier / Explanation 69.00 PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Doc No Inv No Account No 246328 1402247996 246329 1402258407 246330 920671604 246331 920678392 246332 920678387 246333 920726358 246334 920819362 246335 920819356 246336 920819350 246337 920828700 246338 920878412 246339 920878403 246340 920878396 246341 920878390 246342 920901757 246343 920901747 246344 920901737 246345 920979569 246346 920889871 246347 920931619 246348 921726894 339537 9130/2010 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,997.90 246197 12622 24.40 246198 12620 458.55 246199 12613 3,480.85 339538 913012010 117372 CAREFREE LAWN 135.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246416 0031873 -IN 135.95 339539 9/30/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 01359.1705.20 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONSULTING DESIGN 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page- 4 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 611.00 246200 87767 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 98.00 246538 87783 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 709.00 339640 9/30' 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 25.34- CREDIT 116.16- CREDIT 352.43 GOLF CLUBS 10.75 688.80 128.00 704.89 8.13 277.20 948.20 8.72 378.00 259.35 259.35 350.08 223.31 223.31 132.73 1,007.93 PROGRAM FEE 1,007.28 1,000.00- CREDIT 5,826.96 PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Doc No Inv No Account No 246328 1402247996 246329 1402258407 246330 920671604 246331 920678392 246332 920678387 246333 920726358 246334 920819362 246335 920819356 246336 920819350 246337 920828700 246338 920878412 246339 920878403 246340 920878396 246341 920878390 246342 920901757 246343 920901747 246344 920901737 246345 920979569 246346 920889871 246347 920931619 246348 921726894 339537 9130/2010 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,997.90 246197 12622 24.40 246198 12620 458.55 246199 12613 3,480.85 339538 913012010 117372 CAREFREE LAWN 135.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246416 0031873 -IN 135.95 339539 9/30/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 01359.1705.20 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONSULTING DESIGN 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page- 4 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 611.00 246200 87767 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 98.00 246538 87783 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 709.00 339640 9/30' 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY R55CKREG LOG20000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 106693 CITYSPRINT 9/30/2010 - 9/3012010 88.88 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #- Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 15.00 5596524 -8 246234 5596524- 8-9/10 5430.6186 HEAT 450.87 5584304 -9 246417 5584304 -9/10 7411.6186 HEAT 12.82 5584310 -6 246418 5584310 -9/10 7413.6186 HEAT 478.69 339541 9/30/2010 106038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC 1,281.00 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00001609 246233 091310 1,281.00 339642 9130/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 820.90 246201 428018 112.48 246539 428335 933.38 339643 9/30/2010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page- 5 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF FIRE TOWER 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 71.57 00102561 - 0112920000 246114 112920000 -9/10 5841.6189 1,087.29 00086676-0330288022 246115 330288022 -8/10 5310.6189 289.72 00113667 -0120835016 246419 120835016 -9110 5111.6189 1180.6103 SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ELECTION 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,448.58 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. MEDIA STUDIO 339644 9/30/2010 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 106693 CITYSPRINT 88.88 COURIER 246530 19827 88.88 339546 913012010 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 138.94 OXYGEN SENSOR 00003806 246420 - 134910 138.94 339546 913012010 116304 CLAY, DON 294.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 246387 092410 294.00 339647 9130/2010 102166 CLEVELAND GOLF 128.71 GOLF CLUB 246235 3310653 128.71 339548 9/30/2010. 120433 COMCAST 1180.6103 SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ELECTION 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. MEDIA STUDIO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 82.59 8772 10 614 0220686 246491 220686 -9/10 5620.6230 82.59 339649 9130/2010 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 20.58 SAFETY GLASSES, SEALING TAPE 00005149 246116 03754036 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 ACRYLIC PANELS 00003801 246423 CITY OF EDINA 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 180.00 Council Check Register 339666 9/3012010 9/30/2010 — 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 34.95. SAFETY GLASSES, SEALING TAPE 00005149 246116 03754036 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 55.53 1,677.36 246204 569848 339550 913012010 50TH ST SELLING 101974- CONNIE'S CATERING 246540 569847 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 300.00 FOOD 246236 082710 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 300.00 5,370.89 339551 913012010 124807 CORVAL CONSTRUCTORS INC. 124862 DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 391.50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 246421 786473 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS, PW BUILDING 391.50 339552 9/30/2010 339557 913012010 119899 CREEKSIDE SOILS 559.13 1,250.44 MULCH 00001640 246237 67711 -23922 1644.6541 - PLANTINGS & TREES PW BUILDING .- 1,250.44 339553 913012010 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 539.00 PUMP SUMP 246422 78001 1470.6215, EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 539.00 339564 9/30/2010 127293' DAHLEN SIGN CO. 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page 6 Business Unit' EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE -DEPT. GENERAL'- 180.00 ACRYLIC PANELS 00003801 246423 6946 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 180.00 339666 9/3012010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 67.20 246202 569850 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,263.21 246203 569849 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,677.36 246204 569848 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS -SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,319.22 246540 569847 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.90 246541 59846 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,370.89 339556 9130/2010 124862 DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 4,295.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 246521 100110 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS, PW BUILDING 4,295.15 339557 913012010 127298 DEHNCO EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES IN 559.13 MAILBOXES FOR ADMIN PW 00005732 246492 S/227670 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING .- 559.13 339658 9/30/2010 100718 •DELEGARD TOOL CO. 313.10. NOZZLES, IMPACT WRENCH 00005102 246117 512886, 1553.6556. TOOLS 20.68 TORQUE STICKS 00005109 246118 514147 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPER,, GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register' 9/30/2010 — 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 835.76 VISES 00001427 246119 515076 1553.6556 TOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PRINTING MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT LS45 LIFT STATION PUMP REPLACE WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 WM-506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 WM-506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 1,169.54 339559 9/30/2010 103436 DENECKE, LEILA 950.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246388 092410 5110.6103 950.00 339560 9/30/2010 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 68.67 BAKERY 246238 344809 5421.5510 38.62 BAKERY 246239 344945 5421.5510 40.36 BAKERY 246240 345056 5421.5510 46.34 BAKERY 246424 345229 5421.5510 193.99 339561 913012010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 5,020.65 SURCHARGE -AUG 2010 246349 9740053060 1495.4380 5,020.65 339562 913012010 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 31.85 CALENDAR 246493 35841 5621.6575 31.85 339563 9/3012010 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 GMM SEPT- MARTY DOLL 246241 28860 2210.6106 25.00 339564 9/30/2010 100649 ELECTRIC.PUMP INC. 5,735.72 10" CHECK VALVE' 00001573 246120 0042067 -1N 5921.6406 43,018.69 REPLACEMENT PUMP FOR LS #6. 00004216 246494 0041727 -IN 10045.1705.30 48,754.41 339565 9/30/2010 120648 ELLINGSON COMPANIES 1,897.50 FINAL PAYMENT 246350 100110 05506.1705.30 1,897.50 339566 9/30/2010 127267 ELLINGSON DRAINAGE 4,950.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING WM 246351 8126 05506.1705.30 403.00 BOND COST 246352 8127 05506.1705.30 1,507.42 -PRESSURE TESTING 12" WM 246353 8128 05506.1705.30 6,860.42 339567 913012010 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PRINTING MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT LS45 LIFT STATION PUMP REPLACE WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 WM-506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 WM-506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 WM -506 WM REPLACEMENT BY WTP #3 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check,Register 339669 9/30/2010 9/30/2010 —9/30/2010 Check # - Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Y:,'Account No Subledger Account Description 4,334.31 T -90 REPAIRS 246425 50948 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,334.31 342.57 339668 9/30/2010 104991 EVANS, CONNIE 146.63 ADVIL, LIGHTERS 246242 092110 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN 9129/2010 11:25:46 Page- 8 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT- OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT,, =RY SHOP 146.63 339669 9/30/2010 118309 EXTERIOR'BUILDING SERVICES INC 342.57 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 246243 9412 5311.6103 342.57 339570 9/30/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 48.86 ANTIFREEZE 00005121 246121 69- 020550 1553.6530 71.05- ,CREDIT 246122 1- 3442766 1553.6530, 34.88 BULBS 00005121 246123 1- 3455546 1553.6530 89.41 CONNECTOR, RESISTOR 00005121 246124 69- 020664 1553.6530 36.62 RESISTOR 00005121 246125 69- 020653 1553.6530 138.72 339571 913012010 100297 'FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 6.16 PHOTO PROCESSING 08326063 246495 T2- 293650 2210.6408 6.16 339572 9/30/2010 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 3,725.76 CS PARTS 00001718 246126 S01274102.001 5913.6406 3,725.76 339673 9/30/2010 120017 FIRST IMPRESSIONS LAWN SPRINKL 500.78 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246426 14315 01362.1705.20 500.78 339674 9130/2010 119211 FIRSTLAB 269.00 DRUG TESTING 246127 00312009 1550.6121 269.00 339575 9/3012010 101475 FOOTJOY 400.14 GOLF GLOVES 246244 3355695 5440.5511 1,354.58 MERCHANDISE 246245 3366832 5440.5511 1,754.72 339676 9/30/2010 121371 FRANCE 44 906.93 FOOD FOR OPEN HOUSE 246246 SEPT30 5120.6406. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN 9129/2010 11:25:46 Page- 8 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT- OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT,, =RY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 THREADED RODS 00001708 CITY OF EDINA 9346945521 5921.6406 1,813.14 TRANSFORMERS 00005042 246130 Council Check Register 4402.6710 364.40 GASOLINE CANS 00003796 246429 9343927589- 9/30/2010 — 9/30/2010 AIR FILTERS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # — Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 9348010696 5620.6406 906.93 339577 9/3012010 INC 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 547.25 246542- 1,005.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246389 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,005.00 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 339578 9/3012010 100764 G & K SERVICES 949667205 5620.6406 748.13 • 71.05 SHOP TOWELS 246427 1006570327 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 89.00 7.1.05 SHOP TOWELS 246428 1006592284 5422.6201 LAUNDRY SPRINKLER REPAIR 142.10 103065 01359.1705.20 127.56 SPRINKLER' REPAIR • 339679 9/30/2010 01362.1705.20 124541 GEYEN GROUP 293.91. CARPET CLEANING 00006108 246128 2899 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ' 293.91 339580 9/30/2010 124471 GOODPOI14TE TECHNOLOGY INC. 7,180.00 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY 246354 1366 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,872.00 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY 246355 1379: 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES•. 10,052.00 339581 9/30/2010 101103 GRAINGER 80.91 THREADED RODS 00001708 246129 9346945521 5921.6406 1,813.14 TRANSFORMERS 00005042 246130 9341208172, 4402.6710 364.40 GASOLINE CANS 00003796 246429 9343927589- 1470.6406 115.04 AIR FILTERS 00002175 246496 9346232862 5620.6406 438.62 LIGHT BULBS 00002180 246497 9348010696 5620.6406 2,812.11 339582 9/3012010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 547.25 246542- 122462- 5822.5513 547.25 339583 913012010 - 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 748.13 LANTERNS 246498 949667205 5620.6406 748.13 339584 9/30/2010 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 89.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246430 102578 01359.1705.20 89.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246431 103065 01359.1705.20 127.56 SPRINKLER' REPAIR 246499 102220 01362.1705.20 305.56 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page- 9 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE ENGINEERING GENERAL '.ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN EDINBOROUGH PARK BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS R55CKREG LOG20000 14,256.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 CITY OF EDINA 100110 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS'" PW BUILDING Council Check Register 9/30/2010 — 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339586 913012010 .- 100110 - 119787 GREEN LAWN UNDERGROUND SPRINKIL CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 4,410.85 351.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246432 157214 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN - 339591 913012010 351.00 106639 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO. 339586 9/30/2010 8,279.66 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 246524 OCT1 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246390 092410 5110.6103 - 'PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 300.00 9/30/2010 121379, GRIMES, JUDITH 339587 9/36/2010 123946 GREENE, VANESSA 1,397.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 246392 092410 5110.6103 .. 84:00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246391 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 84.00 - 339593 913012010 339588 9/30/2010 102126' GREG LESSMAN SALES 1,229.00 IRON - REMOVER 78.39 PRO TEES 246131 43183 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,229.00 78.39 339589 9130/2010 124864 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 10 Business Unit BA- 362.PARKWOOD KNOLLS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 14,256.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 246522 ' 100110 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS'" PW BUILDING 14,256.65 339590 913012010 106539 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO. 4,410.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 246523. .- 100110 - 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 4,410.85 339591 913012010 106639 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO. 8,279.66 FINAL PAYMENT 246524 OCT1 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 8,279.66 339592 9/30/2010 121379, GRIMES, JUDITH 1,397.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 246392 092410 5110.6103 .. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART-CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,397.50 339593 913012010 100790 HACH COMPANY 1,229.00 IRON - REMOVER 00001343 246132 6907864 5913.6406, GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,229.00 339594 913012010 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 34.97 PLASTIC CONDUIT 00001680 246133 68555 -1 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 34.97 339595 9130/2010 103884 HANCO CORPORATION 84.97 INFLATOR GAUGE 00005115 246134 538239 1553.6556 -TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPEF N GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/30/2010 —9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Suppli6r / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 254.42 INFLATOR GAUGE, CORE TOOLS 000D5115 246135 537774 1553.6556 TOOLS 339.39 339596 9/3012010 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 656.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00005234 246136 21088078 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE 1,274.96 RADIO ADMIN FEE 246433 21088015 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1,930.96 339597 9/3012010 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 152.10 POSTAL & COURIER CHARGES 246531- 91010 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 608.40 POSTAL & COURIER CHARGES 246531 91010 1180.6235 POSTAGE 760.50 339598 913012010 101102 HIDDEN FENCE OF MINNESOTA 164.00 DOG FENCE REPAIR 246434 10- 0915 -0712 -47 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN -164.00 339599 9/30/2010 119164 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 153.11 TRAFFIC CONTROL 00001543 246138 388778 -001 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153.11 339600 9/30/2010 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 120.59 SOAP, DISPENSERS 00002172 246500 6456087 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 120:59 + 339601, 9/3012010 100806 HIRSHFIELD'S 9.62 PAINT 00002174 246501 003409532 5620.6532 PAINT 9.62. 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 11 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ELECTION ELECTION BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 339602 9130/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,894.25 246268 535244 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,481.50 246543 535243 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD`BEER VERNON SELLING 3,375.75 339603 913012010 103869 HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MINNESOTA 777.55- . PRESSURE WASHER REBUILD 00006336 246137 36127 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 777.55 339604 913012010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 17.52 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001626 246247 623033 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 36.63 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001628 246248 623150 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 54.15 GENERAL TURF DARE GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register _ Page - 12 ` 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description- Business Unit 339605 9/30/2010 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 296.10 PHONES /INTERNET 246435 7368002 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 296.10 339606 9/3012010 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 115.00' DOG FENCE REPAIR 246436 134147 01375.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN - BA-375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION 206.49 DOG FENCE REPAIR 246437 133872 01375.1705.20 CONSULTING,DESIGN , BA -375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION 321.49 339607 9/30/2010 124628 J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION 12,794.59 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 246438 8115 -14 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 12,794.59 339608 9/3012010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 635.90 CONTRACTOR ENVELOPES 246356 23367 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 635.90 339609 9/30/2010 116556 JIM'S EQUIPMENT INC. 365.00 DELIVER TO AUCTION 00005241 246357 2009 -1346 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 365.00 339610 913012010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 198.60 246249 1428398 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 291.70 246250 1428393 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,009.62 246269 1433216 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 176.35 246270 1433217 - 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 38.80 246544 1433214 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,490.10 246545 1433213 - 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,688.80 246546 1433215 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. 50TH ST SELLING 9,893.97 339611 9130/2010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO 138.41 LAPPING COMPOUND 00006327 246139 55672748, 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF,COURSE & GROUNDS P 138.41 339613 9/30/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,059.33 246271 1871496 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 72.49 246272 1871499 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING. 1.12 246273 1871481 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,200.52 246274 1913598 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,367.34 246275 1913597 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 13 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,925.85 246276 1913600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 246277 1913589 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 758.18 246278 1913599 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,501.82 246279 1913601 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 102.62 246280 1913596 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3.36 246281 1909643 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 159.75 246282 1909988 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 13.40- 246283 471038 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 16.14- 246284 470661 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10.40- 246285 471270 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 11.04 246286 471269 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 11.67- 246287 471268 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.00- 246288 471796 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.00- 246289 471797 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 29.82- 246290 471843 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 125.52 246547 1913590 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,061.01 246548 1913593 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,249.28 246549 1913595 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,602.82 246550 1913594 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,386.49 246551 1913592 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,317.76 246552 1913591 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 728.03 246553 1914579 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 63.12 246554 1914577 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,239.42 246555 1913585 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,244.16 246556 1913587 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 162.78 246557 1913586 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 954.98 246558 1913584 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.12- 246559 472038 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 28,915.28 339614 913012010 127277 JOHNSON, KAREN 68.00 MEMBERSHIP PRORATE REFUND 246358 091710 5601.4532 SEASON TICKETS EB /CL REVENUES 68.00 339616 9/3012010 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W. 160.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 246393 092410 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 160.00 339616 9/30/2010 102603 JONAS, LENORE 290.25 INSTRUCTOR AC 246394 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 290.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/30/2010 — 9130/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339617 913012010 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR 92.16 UNIFORM PURCHASE 246140 092110 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 92.16 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 339618 9/3012010 120424 KAISER, PETER 299.48 WATER BILL ADJUSTMENT 147481 101606 5900.1211.1 299.48 339619 913012010 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 187.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 246395 092410 5110.6103 187.50 339620 9/3012010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 176.31 UNIFORMS 00003790 246439 147854 1470.6558 219.26 UNIFORMS 00003792 246440 147885 1470.6558 455.92 UNIFORMS 00003777 246441 148521 -01 1470.6558 2,426.06 TRAINING GUNS 246442 149207 7410.6218 3,277.55 339621 9130/2010 117792 KIDDE FIRE TRAINERS INC. 2,788.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 00007427 246443 6635 7413.6103 2,788.00 339622 9/30/2010 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 4,579.91 50TH & FRANCE LANDSCAPING 246502 4257184 01237.1705.20 4,579.91 339623 9/3012010 104979 KOCON, ED 168.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246251 092110 5410.6107 168.00 339624 9/30/2010 127297 KUENZLI, BERNARD 125.99 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 246503 092710 1470.4329 125.99 339625 9/3012010 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS ' 614.96 DWI TOWING 246504 092710 2340.6103 614.96 339626 9/3012010 117189 L & R SUBURBAN LANDSCAPING 95.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246505 6203 SO KNOLL 01362.1705.20 DR 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF FIRE TOWER CONSULTING DESIGN A -237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 339633 9130/2010 101792 LURE -TECH Council Check Register 300.00 TRANSFER LUBRICANTS 00005237 246144 1817203 1553.6584 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 CREDIT ' Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description 95.00 122472 M & I BANK 339627 913012010 246444 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 138.04 FACILITY SUPPLIES 246444 091410 10,518.00. CONTRACT POND TREATMENTS 246252 78796 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10,518.00 339628 9/3012010. 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 690.19 246560 94920 46.72 FITTINGS, TY -RAP, NUTS 00005145 246141 9588215 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 413.30 WASHERS, TAPS, NUTS 00005145 246142 9588214 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS,. - 460.02 339629 9/30/2010 113962 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. , 221.12 POLE WITH STUB 246359 92829130 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 221.12 339630 9/30/2010 106726 LINDMAN, DAVID 32.12 UNDERCOVER PHONE 246506 092710 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.12 339631 9/30/2010_ 100866 LINHOFF PHOTO . 4.75, CANINE PHOTO 246253 117348 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.75 339632 9/30/2010.. 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 9/29/2010 11:25:46 . Page - 15 Business Unit PONDS & LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 116.58 COPIER USAGE 00005236 246143, 1163420 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.58 339633 9130/2010 101792 LURE -TECH 300.00 TRANSFER LUBRICANTS 00005237 246144 1817203 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 161.38- CREDIT 00005237 246145 508699 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 138.62 339634 9/30/2010 122472 M & I BANK 77.17 FACILITY SUPPLIES 246444 091410 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 138.04 FACILITY SUPPLIES 246444 091410 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 351.16 FACILITY SUPPLIES 246444 091410 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 566.37 339635 9/30/2010 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 690.19 246560 94920 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,767.14 246561 94659 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,457.33 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PUBLIC PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 580.18 CITY OF EDINA CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1553.6406 339638 Council Check Register 1552.6406 101267 MBPTA CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1646.6556 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 BUILDING MAINTENANCE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description . 339636 9/30/2010 1646.6406 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 80.00 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 84.95 CLOTHING PURCHASE 246507 092710 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1301.6518 84.95 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 339637 9/30/2010 101425 MASTER ELECTRIC CO. INC. UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 246361 580.18 WIRING FOR LOW VOLTAGE 246445 79729 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 9/29/2010:1 1--.'25:46 Page - ' 16 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1495.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 580.18 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1553.6406 339638 913012010 1552.6406 101267 MBPTA CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1551.6406 80.00 SEMINAR - J. ONISCHUK 1646.6556 246360 OCT28 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.00 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' 1301.6518 339639 9/30/2010 1301.6518 127278 MCNULTY, JANICE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 121.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 246361 5800 YORK 121.72 339640 913012010 101987 MENARDS 9.60 DEFLECTORS 00001691 246146 21070 85.43 SLATWALL 00001691 °246146 21070 95.03 339641 913012010 102281 MENARDS 336.23 TOOL STORAGE CONTAINERS 00001688 246147 91324 17.57 TOGGLE BOLT, SHIMS 00001700 246148 92037 155.15 TOOLS, HARDWARE 00001618 246149 91384 21.29 CONCRETE MIX - 00001635 246254 92844 530.24 339642 913012010 100886 METRO SALES INC 10.69 COURIER SERVICE 246446 26366A 10.69 339643 9/3012010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 126.55 ASPHALT 00001224 246150 107087MB _ 790.42 ASPHALT 00001224 246151 106928MB 916.97 339644 913012010 100892 MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO. IN 50.96 RIBBONS, ROSETTES 00009253 246447 112410 50.96 9/29/2010:1 1--.'25:46 Page - ' 16 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1495.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING' MAINTENANCE ; 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 25.00 CITY OF EDINA 339649 9130/2010 102174 , MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Council Check Register 343.60 METHANE 246448 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 CHEMICALS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339645 9/3012010 127290 MINNESOTA DIRTWORKS INC. 124182 MIKE WEBERT 89,996.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 246525 297.42 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 209388 041009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 297.42 339651 9/3012010 100245 MINNESOTA DNR 339646 9/30/2010 126297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 135.00 FEES FOR FIELD TRAINING DAY 246449 092310 7414.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS 266.00 SUPPLIES 246396 092410 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 339652 288.74 SUPPLIES 246396 092410 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 344.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246396 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50.00 660.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 246396 092410 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100906 MITI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,558.74 175.48 339647 9130/2010 5422.6530 102682 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 105.76 PTO SWITCH 00006335 246154 758389 -00 5431.6530 425.00 FALL SEMINAR REGISTRATION (5) 246362 2016CCLD 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 425.00 16.27 IRRIGATION PARTS .. 00001619 246156 759362 -00 1643.6530 339648 913012010 102682 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY IRRIGATION PARTS 00001619 246157 759359 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 17 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP INSPECTIONS 25.00 LICENSE FEE -TOM EISERT 246363 B002161 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS PSTF FIRE TOWER STS;-362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC PUBLIC PROGRAMS YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE .MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE CENTENNIAL LAKES 25.00 339649 9130/2010 102174 , MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 343.60 METHANE 246448 990377 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 343.60 339650- 9/30/2010 127290 MINNESOTA DIRTWORKS INC. 89,996.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 246525 100110 04362.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 89,996.24 339651 9/3012010 100245 MINNESOTA DNR 135.00 FEES FOR FIELD TRAINING DAY 246449 092310 7414.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS 135.00 339652 9/3012010 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 50.00 WEB ADVERTISING . 246152 116869 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50.00 339653 9/30/2010 100906 MITI DISTRIBUTING INC. 175.48 FUEL PUMP 00006334 246153 758103 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 105.76 PTO SWITCH 00006335 246154 758389 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS 369.07 SHAFTS, LIGHT KIT 00006334 246155 758351 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.27 IRRIGATION PARTS .. 00001619 246156 759362 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 182.37 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001619 246157 759359 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 88.11 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002380 246158 759369 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF FIRE TOWER STS;-362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC PUBLIC PROGRAMS YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE .MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9129/2010 11:25:46 .. Council Check Register Page - - 18 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 164.66 REGULATORS 00006330 246450 757592 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 72.00 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 00006338 246451 759153 -00 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 426.97 SWING JOINTS, TEES 00006331 246452 758430 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF'COURSE & GROUNDS 81.53 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 00006340 246453 759183 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 646.26 DRIVE SHAFT 00006337 246454 758586 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 270.29 AIR CONTROL VALVE 00006341 246455 759479 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 69.62 TEES 00006331 246456 758430 -01 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,668.39 339664 913012010 100916 MUZAK 221.81 MUSIC SERVICE 246159 A676340 5631.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 221.81 339655. 913012010 106334 NELSON, PEGGY. 66.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 246397 092410 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 66.00 339656 913012010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2.500.29 SIGNS FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001182 245906 TI- 0224818 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 5.42 TAX ADJUSTMENT 246364 TI- 0220298ADJ 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 840.04- CREDIT 246365 TI -0223539 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 77.92 ARROWS FOR SIGNS 00001575 246366 TI- 0225127 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 1,743.59 339667 9/30/2010 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 129.75 ZIPLOK BAGS 00003795 246457 P280923300018 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 129.75 339658 913012010 118639 NORTHWEST LASERS INC. 211.61 SLEDGE HAMMER, SPIKES 00005735 246458 S100047123 1260.6577 LUMBER 'ENGINEERING GENERAL 211.61 339659 9/30/2010 116114 OCE 20,231.73 OCE PRINTER/SCANNER 00001229 246367 901646182 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 128.27 AUG MAINTENANCE 246368 987221232 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 124.37 SEPT MAINTENANCE 246369 987247134 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 20,484.37 339660 _ 9/3012010 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 8.28. REGISTER TAPE 00006034 246255 1258425604 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 8.28 R55CKREG LOG20000 124865 PATRIOT ERECTORS INC. CITY OF EDINA 2,339.85 Council Check Register 246526 - 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339661 9/30/2010 PAUSTIS & SONS 118891 OLSON, LYNN 84.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 246508 092410 1400.6203 UNIFORWALLOWANCE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 84.95 2,574.51 339662 9/30/2010 5842.5513. 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC YORK SELLING 380.30 90.74 DISPLAY RACK 00006101 246459 255189 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 90.74 246562 8272184 -IN 339663 9/30/2010 VERNON SELLING 102440 PASS, GRACE 319.50 246563 8275565 -IN 664.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 246398 092410 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL- SERVICES 746.60 INSTRUCTOR AC 246398 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .:3,010.50 1,410.00 246565 8274994 -IN 5842.5512 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 19 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 339664 9/30/2010 124865 PATRIOT ERECTORS INC. 2,339.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 246526 100110 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 2,339.85 339666 9/30/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 608.75 246291 8274894 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK'SELLING 2,574.51 246292 8275554 -IN 5842.5513. COST "OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380.30 246293 8275570 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD .WINE. VERNON SELLING 118.00 " 246562 8272184 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 319.50 246563 8275565 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 643.00 246564 8274184 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .:3,010.50 246565 8274994 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD-LIQUOR _ YORK SELLING 7,654.56• 339666--- 9/3012010 127288 PAUTZ, DAVID 365.20 DRIVEWAY UPGRADE 246460 092410 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 365.20 339667 9/30/2010 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 329.38 246509 62125323 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 329:38 339669 9/30/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 129.90 246205 2963368 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.00 246206 2963369 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13.10- 246207 3444699 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.10- 246208 3444700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.12 246294. 2936381 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,022.81 246295 2936379 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 20 9/30/2010 - 9/3012010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 85.24 246296 2966131 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 579.11 246297 2966139 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,789.93 246298 2966137 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 246299 2966138 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2.24 246300 2966136 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.39- 246301 3444078 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.44- 246302 3444074 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2.11- 246303 3444079 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.00- 246304 3444076 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 428.52 246566 2966133 5842.5512. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 811.20 446567 2966130 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 422.40 246568 2966135 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,614.75 246569 2966134 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,196.25 246570 2966132 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 691.13 246571 2966127 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 268.21 246572 2966129 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 44.37 246573 2966128 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6.32- 246574 3444925 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 14,183.84 339670 9/3012010 127279 PLUTH, DENNIS 85.93 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 246370 6101 HALIFAX 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 85.93 339671 9130/2010 102866 PORTHAN, TODD 94.71 FITNESS DVD 246461 092310 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.71 339672 9130/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,984.97 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 246371 092110 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 4,984.97 339673 9/30/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 220.00 POSTAGE 246399 092410 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 220.00 339674 9/30/2010 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 662.63 WETTING AGENT 00006329 246160 35462 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 662.63 339675 913012010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 612.07 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002386 246161 4927 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKF R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 21 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 493.97 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 00002386 246162 4924 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES . 1,106.04 339676 9/30/2010 123749 QUALITY SEASONS INC. 248.48 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246462 6912 MARK TERR 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 248.48 339677 9/30/2010 10097.1 QUALITY WINE - - 1,721.00 246209 358904 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' ;': YORK SELLING 937.37 246210 359045 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 209.70 246211 358994 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.60 246212 358995 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,317.09 246213 358905 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 135.20 246214 359047 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 545.70 246215 358997 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 723.85 246216 355864-00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,498.58 246305 358903 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,332.26 246306 359046 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 195.20 246307 358717 -00 5862.5513 COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,088.00 246308 358996 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,373.32 246309 358921 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8.90- 246310 352466 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 42.00- 246575 357093 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15,044.97 339678 _ 9/30/2010 123898 . QWEST 58.62 246256 6522 -9/10 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 58.62 339679 9/30/2010 100466 R'& R PRODUCTS INC. 235.22 TIRES 00006333' 246163 CD1377458 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 104.93 TIRE 00006333 246164 CD1380420 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 340.15 339680 9/30/2010 124656 RAINDANCE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN 125.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246463: 10368 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 187.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246464 10369 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 313.90 339681 9/3012010 104460 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 280.00 MAILED WATER BILLS 246165 4626 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 182.00 BILLS MAILED 246257 4649 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 22 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount ' Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No ;Account No Subledger Account Description - - Business Unit , 462.00 339682 9130/2010 106324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 785.00 REPAIRS TO BALLASTS 246465 95228 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 785.00 ' 339683 913012010 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 177.61 FILTER BAGS 00002176 246510 209498 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 177.61 339684 9130/2010 127289 REINAN, BARBARA 55.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246400 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 55.00 339686 9/30/2010 127276 RICE PAPER RESTAURANT 227.61 REFUND 246466 092210 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 227.61 339686 9130/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DO GRILL•AND CHILL 54.60 DILLY BARS 246511 522 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS -SOLD EDINBOROUGH:PARK 22.99 SHEET CAKE 246512 525 5620.5510 COSTOF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 77.59 339687 9/30/2010 102011 RIVER CITY.,JAZZ- ORCHESTRA 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT. 10 /3/10 246372 091710 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 339688 9/30/2010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 614.54 SOFTENER SALT 00008015 246166 00240952 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 614.54 339689 9130/2010 104301 ,.,RUECKERT, MARY. 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT I0 /10/10 - 246513 092410 5621.6136 PROFESSIONALSVC -OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 ` 339690 9/30/2010 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 493.76 OAK WILT INJECTION 00001638 246258 43834 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES " - TREES & MAINTENANCE 493.76 339691 913012010 103369 SANKEY, MOREAU J. 55.00 REIMBURSE FOR SEMINAR 246259' 092110 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 55.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 23 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339692 9/30/2010 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 72.65 BELTS 00001577 246167 2024642 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.65 339693 9/30/2010 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 360.00 GALLERY PT 246401 092410 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 438.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246401 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 798.00 339694 9130/2010 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 10.48 STUDS 00001692 246168 40875334 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 10.48 339695 9/3012010 112875 SECOND FOUNDATION SCHOOL 769.00 INSTRUCTION AC 246402 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 769.00 339696 9/30/2010 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 174.30 CUSTOM SIGNAGE 246373 4553 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 174.30 339697 913012010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 944.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 246403 092410 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 944.00 339698 9/30/2010 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 153.35 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246467 092210 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 153.35 339699 9/30/2010 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS 106.68 POOL REPAIRS 00002177 246514 750 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 106.68 339700 9/3012010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 46.44 BUSINESS CARDS 246260 66192 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.61 BUSINESS CARDS 246261 66185 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 87.05 339701 9/30/2010 106428 SOULE, GARY 585.00 JR GOLF LEAGUE ADMIN 246262 092110 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 585.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 24 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339702 913012010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 295.00 EMT REFRESHER 246468 8453 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 295.00 339703 _ 9/30/2010 120029 SOVEREIGN, JEFFREY 54.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246404 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 54.00 339704 9/30/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 599.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 246405 092410 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,111.00 CLEANING /MAINTENANCE 246405 092410 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,710.00 339706 9/30/2010 104672 SPRINT 10.66 246374 873184124-094 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 45.76 246374 873184124-094 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 51.19 246374 873184124-094 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.19 246374 873184124-094 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 52.75 246374 873184124-094 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 54.93 246374 873184124-094 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 56.53 246374 873184124 -094 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 68.64 246374 873184124-094 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 78.20 246374 873184124 -094 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 105.56 246374 873184124 -094 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 119.67 246374 873184124-094 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 134.94 246374 873184124-094 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 202.54 246374 873184124 -094 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 237.59 246374 873184124 -094 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 272.06 246374 873184124 -094 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 309.76 246374 873184124 -094 5620.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH PARK 344.24 246374 873184124 -094 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 353.26 246374 873184124 -094 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 484.90 246374 873184124 -094 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 746.50 246374 873184124 -094 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,419.84 246374 873184124 -094 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5,200.71 339706 9/30/2010 122877 SQUEEGEE SQUAD 269.37 WINDOW CLEANING 00006109 246169 523801 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 269.37 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/30/2010 — 9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339707 9/3012010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 190.39 WIPER ARM, FITTING 00001425 246170 5180850 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.39 339708 9/30/2010 127294 STREET CRIMES 4,750.00 SEMINAR 246469 2554467 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 4,750.00 339709 9/30/2010 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 14.50 COPIER MAINTENANCE 246171 7713.593 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 14.50 339710 9/30/2010 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 10/7110 246515 092410 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER. EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 - 339711 9/30/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 294.65 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005235 246172 579165 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 294.65 339712 913012010 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 2,716.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 9 246527 100110 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 2,716.05 339713 9/3012010 121492 SUPERIOR.TURF SERVICES INC. 23.01 CHANGE IN AG TAX 246470 6502 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 23.01 339714 913012010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,370.00 246217 MVP01571 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 947.00 24631.1 MVP01563 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 998.00 246576 MVP01600 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,315.00 339715 9/3012010 122047. SWANSON, CATHY 48.75 PROGRAM SERVICES' 246516 -092410 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 48.75 339716 9/30/2010 105982 T.P.C. LANDSCAPE 910.64 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246473 412196 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 910.64 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA `' 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Council Check Register Page - 26 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description Business Unit 339717 9/30/2010 101027 TARGET BANK 45.94 XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 00006109 246471 091810 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 45.94 339718 913012010 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 34.47 ROCKER SWITCH 00005195 246375 82876-00 1553.6530 REPAIR.PARTS. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.87 BULBS 00005104 246376 81423-01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.34 339719 9/30/2010 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 15.00 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT - 246377 092210 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.00 . 339720 9/3012010 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY . 314.50 246263 608892 5421.5514 'COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 335.00 246264 00772525 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 167.60 246472 609844 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 70.00 246577 609455 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING . 2,106.95 246578 609454 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,994.05 339721 913012010 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FILE 246173 25802 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING BOTH STREET GENERAL 14.25 MONTHLY FTP, FILE 246173 25802 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FILE 246173 25802 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.75 339722 913012010 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 118.54 MOUNTING BRACKETS 00005047 246378 LC00000942 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.54 339723 9130/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 705.62 CONTROLLERS, BEARINGS 00006325 246174 S124677 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 212.20 TIRE 00005156 246379 0122477 1553.6583 TIRES•& TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.01 SEAL 00006333 246474 0122398 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 986.83 339724 9/3012010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 74.80 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 246380 101705840 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.80 339725 - 9/3019 •' 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 395.44 SEED MIXTURE 00006328 246175 23905 5431.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 846.98 SEED MIXTURE 00006457 246176 23963 5424.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 9129/2010 11:25:46 Page - 27 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE RANGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 1,242.42 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PAPER SUPPLIES 339726 913012010 YORK SELLING 101049 UHL COMPANY 217.50 SENSOR REPLACEMENT 246475 51997 7411.6103 217.50 339727 9130/2010 101063 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 249.29 CONDUIT, PASTE 00001682 246177 519958 1322.6406 249.29 339728 9/30/2010 118284. UPPER MISSISSIPPI IRRIGATION 418.05 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246476 6316 LOCHMOOR 01359.1705.20 418.05 339729 9/3012010 127291 URBAN COMPANIES 1,130.00 FINAL PAYMENT 246528 100110 4402.1705.30 1,130.00 339730 9/30/2010 100060. USPS- HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 246178 092110 1550.6235 4,000.00 339731 913012010 122654 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 158.66 OXYGEN 00003649 246477 439000 1470.6510 158.66 339732 9130/2010 101058: VAN PAPER CO. 118.50 CAN LINERS 00001603 246179 172528 -01 1645.6406 300.94 LIQUOR BAGS 246180 173521 -00 5822.6512 154.74 TISSUE, TOWELS 00001632 246265 '. 173649 -00 1646.6406_ 535.26 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 246381 173525 -00 5842.6512 60.15 ROLLTOWEL 00007512 246517 173662 -00 5842.6512 1,169.59 339733 9/30/2010 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.57 246181 2457200935 5952.6188 69.58 246181 2457200935 1495.6188 78.95 246181 2457200935 1120.6188 96.99 246181 2457200935 1600.6188 170.79 "246181 2457200935 1640.6188 9129/2010 11:25:46 Page - 27 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE RANGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING TELEPHONE RECYCLING TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 PETTY CASH 246382 CITY OF EDINA 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 173.16 Council Check Register 339740 9/3012010 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 285.04 246181 2457200935 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 93.92 246518 2456328859 1400.6188 TELEPHONE, 827.84 402.30 246312 251780 -00 339734 9/30/2010 VERNON SELLING 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 246579 251783 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 86.24 FRONT AXLE. 00002381 246182 51272 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,160.00 .GOLF, CART RENTALS 00006023 246478 51367 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 1,246.24 5,424.74 246313 333069 339736 9/3012010 VERNON SELLING 101786 VIDEO PROTECTION SERVICES 133.50 DIGITAL RECORDER OPERATION 00005129 246479 5129 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 133.50 339736 9/3012010 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,277.37 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00005137 246183 4805981 4402.6710- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 21.34 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00005137 246184 4806173 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 69.75 ELECTRIC CORD, ADAPTER 00005151-246486 4831253 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,368.46 339737 9/30/2010 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 47.45 SAFETY GLASSES 00005148 246185 255883 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 47.45 339738 9/30/2010 124969 W. L. HALL COMPANY 3,775.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 9 246529 100110 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 3,775.30 339739 9/30/2010 106440 WEIGLE, SUE 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 28 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF CARS PW BUILDING PW BUILDING PW BUILDING PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE PW BUILDING 173.16 PETTY CASH 246382 092010 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 173.16 339740 9/3012010 105287 WEMYSS, SCOTT D. 345.63 NAMETAGS - SOT 00003800 246481 03-173 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 345.63 339741 9/3012010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 402.30 246312 251780 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 404.19 246579 251783 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 806.49 339742 9/30/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 5,424.74 246313 333069 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 29 9/30/2010 -9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276.86 246314 333067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 246315 50032 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 2,368.70 246580 333068 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 158.99 246581 333066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE WTH ST SELLING 8,222.62 ` 339743 9130/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 91.65 246218 460089 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING - 2,589.77 246219 460091 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120.00 246220 458164 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,115.07 246221 460086 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 56TH ST SELLING 2,638.67 246222 460087 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE' 50TH ST SELLING 2,127.06 246223 456759 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 923.77 246224 456757 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 106.59- 246225 809976 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 254:15- 246226 809932 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 145.05- 246227 809977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,543.52 246316' 460085 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 970.00 246317 458832 5862.5513 COST OF.GOODS SOLD 'NNE VERNON'SELLING 10,392.22 246318 460088 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R YORK SELLING 6,456.67 246319 460083 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20.30- 246320 810032 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 119.34 246321 809580 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 359.70 246582 460607 5822.5513 COST`OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,403.76 246583 459990 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 40,086.43 339744 9/30/2010 124529, WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 60.00 246228 660022 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING - 3,815.60 246229 660021 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER- YORK SELLING 2,297.50 246322 659158 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - VERNON SELLING 624.00 246323 659461 5862.5514 COST OF'GOODS.SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,803.50 246324 659460 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON.- SELLING 1,785.02 246584 661591 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER , 50TH ST SELLING 11,385.62 339746 9/30/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,067.40 246230 254616 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS_SOLD WINE 50TH•ST SELLING 843.70 246231 254617 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,911.10 339746 9/30/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/30/2010 —9/30/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 4,172.20 51- 6227619 -3 246186 253183561 5630.6185 45.88 51- 5276505 -8 246187 253519828 1330.6185 11,272.26 51- 6644819 -9 246519 254552418 5620.6185 9,003.56 51- 6955679 -8 246520 254727692 1551.6185 24,493.90 339747 913012010 103684 XPEDX 5.30 FUEL SURCHARGE 246266 9012184923 2210.6123 5.30 339748 9130/2010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 133.90 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00006342 246482 54066449 5422.6406 133.90 Subledger Account Description 339749 9/30/2010 118580 CITY OF EDINA 3,600.00 WATER/SEWER FEES 246585 BD2010 -002 5600.1720 3,600.00 562,137.29 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 562,137.29 Total Payments 562,137.29 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 9/29/2010 11:25:46 Page - 30 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC SIGNALS EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/29/2010 11:26:38 Council Check Summary Page - 1 9/30/2010 - 9/30/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 56,540.02 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 5,141.10 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 614.96 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 72,680.41 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 20,231.73 05100 ART CENTER FUND 14,888.34 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,231.03 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,911.92 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 749.15 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 26,662.62 05800 LIQUOR FUND 164,612.78 05900 UTILITY FUND 64,523.34 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 100,893.74 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.57 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 12,423.58 Report Totals ' 562,137.29 We confirm to the besfof our knowledge and belidtr that these.ciaims Comply, in- material, respects with the requirements of the City of Edina-purchasing polices 4nd Procedures da �� r & o4 Le �y REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: OCTOBER 4, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. RECEIVED 0 c T 012010 1 �� -�-� �2 U � Ci fi -� Z ✓✓1 � e�� rt c� ctt � Oi,c �� J i ei,cJ � a S'�` ✓1 i iti. �" C�.IoOL'..T` a �� +� ►� fi C. l �. I� 1�a• l Iz c �, e t e '' G4_ "as 1 �.✓v�. ; ►^� f1Ld Cc� n C�h cuti k � � S ►M� �t�i a I (,� d c� rd .,�` -� s c ✓�c� I s C, 1 pea (4 'k�- k ' ''�� ci e. Cc`s � �s �o f � rr chrs� +k t s cy -(-► o " �� ca✓� r� ;mv,1 -� -i ( I�j (aid rnSS %� es I J C (L^ b t re. P awe cl ()w -to �ac i l r` � cl: -c � p rdiQ cfi. rr % VK 11\ ,ivk c, o,r c o n ul LK s ,, Ft,( �{ ✓� - Cv rn e, — 7�P (.l S e ct J� e l�ta �e i ✓ . s A- -3 s n C!z uJ�e1z -(+�- c CC (1� 14,1d e -r-- c&- ✓Lce,� as ul 0 � � u as ,ea,- k l- o it tke ea-sf �- �a Jm CL I�cz ,te ;�1d � a ✓`ocr,, lam- Ice VIJ e -e-�d c� Are- IiAk C d ✓l ems► a �'C.� -*, `l �,ry ► V1 -00 e c {S k� �r vt 0 f -A.e r c u n COO.+ l�-e1� an e ` V L ", � r e �- Cl � a s v✓� 0- 0 ce e uJ a� l e- I ,ro ' ecA a (- C. o n ( s r ` ems I ` k�l i � as s� s ✓� �s �- b e � � � I � b�-I- � o e sn'% � �- �� (; k�l� � ; < < Ira v� -b lo-e- � I ark e� ►� -t-�e � e x i- 10 i e ct,✓�S' o r .S'o . J e e� o' ;�s� -il�e �'ai I r0ad rop e-,r b`� �o i i ers ie�.r s —i o s �e I <��2� pt J eJ I o►� �- " l r �-e ��d � cam► � ad � ; Sea � b �� a 100 �� �a (k r, o � --ham � � ( 5-�w� s , l ( , � q D " - - js teal( aGk� ` T S°``� CC-" ej; A-oa ea&- go"cl 1 r -� fiead l �5 ttl's , Cd; ev,,L Ci l:l COLL-"lcd C -112 � Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Bicycle Trail through Edina From: Denise Fryzek [ mailto :denise.fryzek @hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Proposed Bicycle Trail through Edina Hello City Council, I attended the meeting of the Edina City Council and the Three RIvers Park Board members recently at the South View Middle School. Would like to give you my thoughts from listening to this piece of the process in determining if and where a bike route might go. As a citizen of Edina I want to say that I support a bike route going through Edina and connecting to the Three RIvers bike routes that are already available, however I would support the safest route possible for all residents. I have two main thoughts. One thing that I noticed from the presentation is that it is not apparent to me that the residents of Edina actually want a bike route. The data that was presented is very misleading. THe main point from the data is that residents want "walking and biking" opportunities. With these two activities lumped together into one category we really don't know the breakout of each of them. We don't know if walking is desired, biking is desired or both walking and biking is desired. I don't doubt that both are desired but in what ratios? Studies are often designed to benefit the opinions one is trying to capture. It's important to be able to "read" a study objectionally. The other point I would like to bring up is of safety. This is my main concern. As a resident who does a fair amount of driving back and forth through the community, in the past couple of years I have become a very cautious driver and it is because I am very much afraid of hitting a cyclist. On a daily basis, as I drive around town, I look twice and three times about me to be sure I don't hit a cyclist. I believe we have to be more proactive in considering safety. With more and more cycles on the road, we must consider the safety of the cyclist and how the cyclists and cars share the spaces. I am afraid that if we don't give the cyclists a more separate place to ride then we will have more difficulties managing the safety of the cyclists mixed in with the cars. This brings me to another thought. It seems as if there is a wide range of bicycling styles these days. I wonder if there is a set of bike rules that cyclist should be following and if so how would they know about them? We have training and laws regarding driving motorized vehicles, does the State of Minnesota have any rules about cyclists and can we do some educating regarding them? Thank you, Denise Fryzek 952 - 928 -9078 den ise fryzek @hotmail.com September 26, 2010 Mayor James Hovland Council Member Ann Swenson Council Member Scott Housh Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle 'Re: Opposition to Bike Trail along 9 Mile Creek. I have attached a copy -.& an article from the Sunday Star Tribune regarding the winter upkeep of the proposed trail November 15th to March 31st: This clearly indicates there would be more cost and responsibility to the City of Edina if the trail is put along 9 Mile Creek. I think it- is important you consider this information prior to your meeting with Three Rivers on Wednesday. Also, it would be important to know who owns the Burnsville aggregate pit and their relationship with Three Rivers. This would be just one more reason not to put the trail along the creek. Please, please do.not vote to put the trail along the creek. Thank you. Mary Landberg 5408 Creek View Lane Edina ' MN 55439 -1310 .0 • STAR TRIBUNE • SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2010 (SW) o i cities ste u t plowed e � p Trails � Y Trails are cleared. Of snow only if cities step up • Three Rivers Park District doesn't plow its 10 regional trails come winter, but many suburbs do. By LAURIE BLAU Iblake@smrtnbuiae.com In. winter, Three Rivers Park Dis- trict's 10 popular regional trails are up foradoption. Those in cities such as St. Louis Park, Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park . are picked up, reflecting a local desire to keep the trails clear during snowy months for walkers, runners and even bike commuters. Others draw no. champions and are quietly snowed:in. They include the Da- kota Rail and Lake Independence trails, which are lined by cities unwilling to take on the maintenance and liability. Three Rivers tends to' the trails spring, summer and fall . But from Nov 15 to March 31, they're closed unless cit- ies choose to take over the maintenance of segments within their jurisdictions. "We don't have the capacity to oper- ate all these many miles of trails in the winter," said Margie Walz, the district's associate superintendent Since the mid- 1990s, Three Rivers has given cities the option to use city crews to keep the trails open. St. Louis Park clears snow from the TRAILS FROM B1 Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail from Minneapolis through St. Louis Park to Hopkins. "It is such an excellent ame- nity, it's hard to see it shut down for an entire season," said Cindy Walsh, the city's di- rector of parks. People walk, run and bike the trail all win- ter "We are very happy with its use and impressed with the people who use it all year round, "'she said. Brooklyn Center's segment of the North Mississippi. Re-. gional Trail is just four blocks, but the city keeps it open all winter because it links resi- dents to a larger trail system, said Todd Berg, supervisor of parks and streets. "It's a pretty important part of the park sys- tem for residents." In Brooklyn Park, "we would hear from our residents" if the city didn't plow the 4 miles of Rush Creek Regional Trail and the 4 miles of the Shingle Creek Regional Trail that run through (town, said Jon Oyanagi, direc- tor of recreation and parks. Golf course employees get winter trail maintenance du- ((WE DON'T HAVE THE CAPACITY TO OPERATE ALL THESE MANY. MILES OF TRAILS IN THE WINTER. )) Margie Walz of Three Rivers Park District ties because the city thinks it's important to provide res- idents with "fitness and year- round outdoor opportunities;' he said. Minnetonka and Excelsi- or regularly take on segments of the Lake Minnetonka LRT. Regional Trail. Golden Valley, Greenwood, Hopkins, Maple Grove, Plymouth, New Hope and Shorewood also adopt the stretch of trails within their borders. Eden Prairie plows the Min- nesota River Bluffs LRT Re- gional Trail for walking, jog- ging and, bike commuting, said Parks and Recreation Di- rector Jay Lotthammer. "More and more, people getting into year -round bike commuting use that as a safe way to com- mute," he said. Taking on a trail segment for the winter comes with rules. Three Rivers requires cities .to room for users of the trail but won't plow it this winter. City Public Works Super- intendent run Fackler said the permit required "is pretty spe- cific about how everything needed to be done, and they [council members] were not obtain a permit and buy liabil- comfortable with that-" ity insurance as well as plow, Without plowing, the trail sweep, sand, pick up trash and is typically snow - covered, but post permissible activities. people may walk or ski on it To control ice on. crushed anyway, Fackler said. . limestone trails, Three Rivers Neighboring Spring Park insists that cities "use buff' col- and Minnetonka Beach also ored. three- eighth -inch, . clear will let their segments of the limestone chips, sold only by Dakota Rail Trail close for the one Burnsville aggregate pit winter. The district also requires cit- "We discuss it every year," ies to repair trail surface dam- said Spring Park utility super - age done during the winter. intendent DJ Goman. "We do So far officials along the 13- not do the snow removal, ice mile Dakota Rail Trail, which removal — any of that:' has quickly become one of the Minnetonka Beach consid- most popular in the state, have ers care of the trail "too much decided not to take on these re- maintenance," said city Admin- sponsibilities. istrator Suzanne Griffin. "We don't do any trails in In cities where trails are not terms of snow removal for win plowed, Three Rivers posts ter maintenance — we don't warnings that they won't be have the resources to do that:' maintained but does not bar said David Abel, assistant plan- people from using them, Walz ner for Minnetrista, home to 2 said. to 3 miles of the paved trail. Come spring, "we take the Mound, at the midway point trails back." of the Dakota Rail Trail, is in ,1 the process of putting in a bath- Laurie Blake • 612. 673 -1711 RECEIVED (,:. I J 1 LUID WHITE PAPER The purpose of this paper is to provide helpful information to the Edina City Council ( "Council ") in its consideration of the proposal of the Three Rivers Park District ("Park District ") to construct a regional bike and pedestrian trail ( "Trail ") which will go through a part of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed ( "Watershed) in the City of Edina ( "City "). This paper will address two concerns, environmental and construction cost. 1. Environmental Concerns. a. EAW. The Park District has entered into an agreement ("Agreement") with Bonestroo, Inc. ( "Consultant ") to provide environmental and other data, principally related to the Watershed, which would assist the Park District in determining the route of the Trail through the City. The Agreement provides that the Consultant "will use available data ... to assess the cumulative (environmental) impacts of the" Trail, and that "(t)his assessment will not include on -site field investigation." The Agreement also makes reference to an Environmental Impact Statement ( "EIS ") which presumably involves a "boots on the ground" assessment of the environmental prudence of constructing any 16 foot wide trail through the Watershed. It is submitted that without such an EIS evaluation and assessment, the Council would not have sufficient data to act on the Trail. Even without the EIS, however, a fair reading of the 51 page narrative in the EAW would lead one to conclude that the Trail should not be constructed through the Watershed, for many reasons, including the following: b. Trees. Trees, especially in Edina, are esteemed for their aesthetic value, shade, a buffer from extraneous noise, carbon sequestration, reduction of pollutants and air quality enhancement. The construction of the Trail will involve cutting down countless trees, including large, old majestic cottonwoods. Such removal would have a devastating environment impact on the Watershed and the homes adjacent to the Trail. Further, the removal of the trees would leave a huge carbon footprint on the Watershed which the Park District in its technical assessment designates as "not quantifiable." c. Wildlife Habitat. Although difficult to quantify, experience indicates that construction and use of the Trail, especially in environmentally pristine areas, would have a significant adverse affect on the habitat of small animals and birds. To substantiate that affect, one need only walk around Bredesen Park. Sightings of animals (except for dogs) are all but non - existent and birds are few. No doubt the activities of walkers, joggers, and bikers scare off animals and birds. d. Noise. According to the EAW, the Environmental Quality Board of the State of Minnesota defines the environment to include ambient noise. During the construction of the Trail which, according to the EAW, may occur over several years, the noise generated by trucks, earth moving and other machinery, cutting down trees and removing stumps, building retaining walls and other construction activity will be noxious and continuing to homeowners adjacent to the Trail. In addition, the EAW proposes the extensive use of boardwalks for travel over the wetlands in the Watershed. Presumably, the boardwalks will have wooden slats, which is customary. Since the Consultant in the EAW estimates that the Trail will generate approximately 500,000 annual trail visits, the noise of the bike wheels on the wooden boardwalks will be significant and noxious, especially to nearby homeowners. Yet, the EAW did not address this important issue and indeed in paragraph 30 states that environmental impacts not addressed in the EAW "are not anticipated." e. Safety There are two aspects of trail safety: safety from criminal actions and safety of walkers, bicyclists and motorists from personal injury. The Park District claims that the two dedicated bicycle police officers are sufficient to protect against crime. But those two, who are the only policemen stationed on the Park District trail system, must cover the entire approximately 100 miles of trails. The Park District also has about 40 park police and others who are not on the trail. Rather, they are stationed in parks around the area. They are considered "first responders." But by definition they respond to crime, they don't prevent it. 2. Construction Costs. The Park District proposes to spend an estimated $18 to $20 million of our Hennepin County tax dollars for the Trail. If past experience is any indicator, the costs could easily run up to $24 million. The Park District currently funds most of its construction with general revenue bonds. These bonds pay over 4% interest and can mature in over 13 years. This would add another $10.7 million in financing costs to the trail. The original $20 million estimate, plus $4 million over run, plus $11 million bond financing cost, could easily bring the total cost to over $35 million. The Park District plans to spend this money to build a recreational trail with the borrowed money while the nation, the state, Hennepin County, local school districts, and individuals struggle to meet their financial obligations. Surely there are better places to put our tax dollars. The environmental concerns section of this paper was prepared by Richard C. Johnson, CAT member for Segment 1. The construction costs section of this paper was prepared by William Westerdahl and appeared in a recent issue of the Sun Current. Susan Howl aeptember 26, 2010 Mayor James Hovland Council Member Ann SwensonEa✓11�r' Council Member Scott Housh 0 In Council Member Joni Bennett SE Council Member Mary Brindle Re: Proposed Three Rivers trail in.Edina It appears that the costs associated with Three Rivers' projects only go up. I refer you to Sunday's Star Tribune report headlined: Trails are cleared of snow only if cities step up. If these people get their hands on Edina's creek land, the city will be dictated to until the end of time. Remember, this is the group that wants other taxpayers to help share the pain of repairing the Coon Rapids dam on the Mississippi. Why should Edina assume the responsbility and expense of keeping trails open year round? (And there will be great pressure from other municipalities to keep it running.) Three Rivers insists municipalities shoulder the costs of insurance and winter upkeep and that a specific size and color of limestone chips be used in controlling ice. The chips are available ONLY from one aggregate source in Burnsville. My question here is: What are the ties between the aggregate pit and Three Rivers? Would yo.0 ask this question on Wednesday night? Three Rivers needs to be watched and I hope that's what you will do. And I plead with you to keep the trail off-9 Mile Creek. Jim Landberg 5408 Creek View Lane Edina MN 55439 Susan Howl To: John Keprios SEP 3 0 10"0 Subject: CAT Group Trail Alignment Proposal Hello' John, Recently you passed along an e-mail from a CAT group member Pete McCarty that was suggesting a new trail alignment. This past spring I volunteered to be the park board representative of the CAT group. I have followed this issue very closely as the trail will come as close to my property as any other along all suggested routes. [.,was surprised to see this recommendation from the CAT group,as I was completely unaware that anew route was being proposed by the group I was "supposed to be a part of. I was not included in that proposed alignment or process in.any. way. I called my neighbor Nancy Crain who is the segment 19 CAT member and she was unaware of_that proposal as well. It seems as if the original purpose of setting Op a CAT group has become fractionalized and the intent derailed. I do not think this proposal should be given. consideration in front of the park board as "The CAT Group" for. that reason. I'm certain there are many�residents along their new proposed route that would - be far from thrilled and. should be informed if what now seems like a special interest group' is given forum. I believe . the appropriate forum should be the publicized hearing in front of City Council. The CAT group that I was a part of was =given time to discuss the issues and present- ideas to the Three River Park District. I thought our job as :a CAT group was completed with the publication of our Assessment. Would you please pass this e-mail along to other Park Board members and our City Council Sincerely, Joseph Hulbert Vice: President; Financial Advisor Morgan Stanley Smith Barney 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1150 Bloomington, MN 55437 952 - 921 -1997 direct 800 - 927 -1990 toll free 952- 921 -1944 fax 1 RECEIVED Susan Howl 'Mayor Hovland, Council Members Housh, Swenson, Bennett, and Brindle, I appreciate your continued efforts to involve the community in the planning process for the 9 Mile Creek Trail and in maintaining an extremely transparent agenda of information exchange. Last evenings meeting helped to alleviate concerns regarding the financial health of the project, the environmental impact, and safety.concerns due to the multipurpose nature of the trail. The willingness of 3 Rivers planners to,work with city officials regarding the detailed alignment of the trail as it traverses existing park facilities, privacy accommodations for adjacent property owners, and the kinds of materials used for the boardwalk segments demonstrate the level of detail and the cooperative alliance that will characterize this project. New information presented by Kelly Grissman including,the number;.of road crossings (30 for the creek based vs 11 for the road based. option), the large number of letters sent by;high school students, and the fact that of the 118 letters,in favor of the trail (97, unique letters'and 21 form letters) only one supported`the road based option, indicating a stronger case for the creek based rather than the road based option. I have become aware of anew alignment, proposal being promoted as the recommendation of the 3 Rivers CAT group. I find it interesting that the folks who produced this alignment are promoting it.as work of the CAT entity. I was a member of the CAT group as was Joseph Hulbert, neither of us were aware of any ongoing meetings or alignment development. I suspect that Eric Burfeind, the rep for Edina High School, was also not included in these "CAT "meetings. It is misrepresentation by this group to imply that they have'any official standing or.privilege, and they should not be given a voice in any hearings that is not also afforded to other:special interest groups who choose to step forward. I see one area in which clarification is-needed to make a sound decision- the height of the proposed boardwalk. I did check with the Planning Department this morning and was told by Chris that the adjacent houses must have their lowest level at 2 feet above the 100 year flood level. While the question remains as to the exact height of the boardwalk it is clear that the boardwalk, whether built at the 100 or the 50 year flood plain level, would not be higher that the dining room of houses built adjacent to the creek. In reading over my notes of the meeting I have some concerns about the proposed decision making process. It is clear that the majority of the funding will come from surface transportation grants and that the local match will be split between 3 River and the 9 Mile Creek Watershed. 3 Rivers is a highly successful grant applicant, but will need a decision by February in order to prepare the application by the June 2010 deadline. The grant will become available in 2015 and 2016, so the potential to work with the Watershed's goal of restoration between 2013 -2015 is possible. If the deadline is missed, the next funding round will be in 2013, with grant. distribution,, in 2017 and 2018- well past the dates that would allow a coordinated joint project with the Watershed. All of this assumes that the project will receive funding, but there are no guarantees. We have worked through a very long and emotional information gathering process. If there is a very protracted course as input is sought from the Park Board, Transportation Commission, Health and Humari Relations Commission, School Board, and 3 Rivers Board of Commissioners the potential to work with the Watershed may be lost, the ugly division that is scarring our community will continue, and of course residents will be denied the opportunity to enjoy this new park, if approved, for several more years. The Council will be criticized for scheduling a public hearing ,.during the Christmas season if the meeting schedule falls into late December. I would like to suggest that you set the public hearing on this matter at the next Council meeting. A public hearing scheduled for late November or early December will give ample time for other Boards to weigh in, will allow 3 Rivers the lead time they need to prepare a successful grant application, will allow interested citizens who wish to testify to adjust their schedule, and will give the residents some closure to this very protracted discussion. Council Member Housh hit the nail on the head- It's time for a decision, up or down. Alice Hulbert BETF rep to the CAT group TO: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Cary Teague, Planning Director Kris Aaker, Assistant Planning Director FROM: Scott Nelson 4505 Garrison Lane RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2010 I have lived next door to Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino for 17 years. I am familiar with the design of the new house they are proposing to build and support their plans. It would seem that an option short of a variance, which requires proving hardship, should be available, especially given the current court case and the risks of proceeding. The house they are proposing to build is designed to blend with the context of our neighborhood and is exactly the kind of project that the Edina city code ought to be promoting, not preventing. I am also an architect and familiar with several zoning codes in the Twin Cities, most particularly Minneapolis. There are several different approaches to broadening the use of the city code to achieve what should be the universal goal of making new projects blend with the context of the existing neighborhood. This should include adding conditional use permits. They could be used for a variety of aspects on different projects, height, bulk, roof slope etc. (as determined by commission and council) There is a perhaps a higher level of subjectivity involved, but that is why we have a first rate staff and planning commission. The basic requirement for granting a conditional use permit is that a proposed building or addition meet the intent of the city's comprehensive plan and not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or properties. This is easier to achieve than proving hardship and would give the city staff and planning commission another tool to with which to provide design controls yet also provide some flexibility to adapt to different conditions. I strongly encourage you to consider amending the city code to add conditional use permits for at least the current first floor height limitation as is being discussed for Jeff and Connie's house. I support reasonable building ordinances that promote maintaining design context. There is great variety in the housing styles in Edina. a one size fits all city code is too limiting. The staff, commission, and council should have options other than variances. I hope you will consider this request and help Jeff and Connie build their house and improve our neighborhood. Please consider our request. i September 22, 2010 Mayor James B. Hovland Esq. Krause & Hovland Chartered 310 Groveland Ave. Minneapolis MN. 55403 City Council Members City of Edina 4801 W. 50t` Street Edina MN. 55424 RECEIVED SEP 2 3 1010 9e5,0— 988 9610 Re: Working Session with Three Rivers Park District Board Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am the Community Assessment Team representative for alternative Section 3 of the proposed Regional Trail through Edina. Section 3 would be located on the North side of Vernon Ave. and the East side of Lincoln Drive between the intersection of Vernon and Gleason Rd. on the East and the intersection of Lincoln Dr. and Duncan Lane near the Caribou Coffee Shop at Hwy. 169 on the West. It would replace the existing sidewalk in that area. Section 2 is the Creek -based route that is the alternative to Section 3. Section 2 would follow Nine Mile Creek from the intersection of Vernon and Gleason, through Walnut Ridge Park to Duncan lane and Lincoln Dr. I am writing because I understand that there will be a working session between the Council and Three Rivers Park District Board during which the council will have the opportunity to discuss issues related to location of the proposed Trail. Safety is the most important issue for all residents of Section 3; safety of pedestrians, bicyclists and automobile drivers. Vernon Ave./Lincoln Dr. is a very busy roadway, principally because it is the only access /egress to and from United Healthcare's Headquarters. According to United Healthcare's property director, approximately 1100 cars enter and exit their parking facility every weekday. Each of those drivers would have to cross the proposed trail twice each day, since there is only one entrance /exit. Furthermore, every resident who lives North of Vernon and/or East of Lincoln would have to cross the Trail in order to leave his or her residence by car. That is because Nine Mile Creek forms the northeastern leg of a triangle bounded by Section 3 on the other two sides. There is only one route into and out of each condominium complex, town home complex, and neighborhood. There are at least 790 residents of this Section, assuming only one resident per dwelling unit —a very conservative assumption. Thus, on an average, there would be approximately 1900 cars crossing the Trail twice each day totaling approximately 3800 Trail crossings. Recognizing this safety problem, the Park District is proposing to place 8 sets of stop signs for bicyclists in this one and one - quarter (1.25) mile Section of the Trail. Any council member that bikes knows what is likely to happen: Commuter bicyclists won't use the trail; they will ride in the street rather than stop every approximately 800 feet; Recreational users are unlikely to use the Trail because the Trail would abut a heavily trafficked street and contain many road crossings. Both the Department of Natural Resources as well as the Park District's own surveys reach the same conclusion in their reports on constructing Trails in general and this Trail specifically.' The third interested group — walkers, are happy with the sidewalk as is. During the council's discussion with the Park District Board, if the council believes it would be appropriate, please ask the Board this question: "Does the board recommend placing a Trail immediately next to a busy thoroughfare, with 8 bicycle interruptions within one and one - quarter miles, where there are likely to be approximately on average over 3,000 Trail crossings by automobiles every day." If the Board answers negatively, the city can eliminate Section 3 from further consideration as a possible route. Please remember, too, that the resolution the council passed on this issue on January 6, 2009, was passed after extensive debate on its wording. The final version of that resolution approved water quality improvement projects including an "off -road multipurpose trail accompanying the Creek to the extent possible...." Nothing in the studies by Three Rivers Park District or the Environmental Quality Board suggests that it would be impossible to construct the Trail along Section 2, the creek -based alternative to Section 3. There are many other reasons not to locate a Trail on Section 3 including the lack of aesthetic attraction. But because of the serious safety risks alone, I respectfully request the Mayor and City Council to eliminate Section 3 from further consideration as a possible Trail route. Very truly yours, Robert A. Schwartzbauer 1 MNDNR, Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines 2007, §2.2. Environmental Quality Worksheet, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, June 3, 2010 pg. 7 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Alternative route for proposed regional bike path kttachments: proposed trail opus to braemar.pdf From: Bob Lubar [mailto :rlubar @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:41 PM To: Lynette Biunno; John Keprios Cc: 'WESTERDAHL WILLIAM'; Chappy6420 @aol.com; FWCORRIGAN @MAC.COM RECEIVED Subject: Alternative route for proposed regional bike path SE? 17 2010 To Mayor, City Council, and Park and Recreation Director: Attached is a copy of an alternative route for the; proposed regional bike trail. This proposal was presented to Mayor Hovland on August 27, 2010 during a meeting with 3 Edina neighborhood residents. The route begins,where the Hopkins trail segment ends. It proceeds through existing paved trails within the Opus area. This area is filled with existing trails -that could be easily adapted for the intent of the trail (see attachment). It will also connect with the proposed light rail station.. A definite plus for facilitating our mass transit objectives. The route proceeds along an existing tree lined boulevard within a small section of Eden Prairie. It proceeds along Flying Cloud Drive and Washington Ave providing workers with easy access by bikers. It will also provide increased visibility to these businesses. The trail continues through Braemar Park, providing users with easier access to recreation fields and other activities within the park. I was told by a Mary Brindle that the park is considered underutilized. This plan would help drive people to the park. Note that the route would impact far fewer households than the current proposal. This trails also stays clear of high maintenance and expensive development costs associated with building along a wetland. As I told Mayor Hovland on that date this plan has several advantages and a few disadvantages to the current proposal. Disavantages: 1. Route crosses 3 municipalities and would perhaps be more difficult to coordinate. Advantages: 1. Connects with the proposed light rail station in the Opus Center. a. Supports the mass transportation plan objectives 2. Helps commuter and recreational bikers by pushing bike traffic through business districts within Minnetonka, Edina, and Eden Prairie. a. Increase access. and visibility to the services offered by these local businesses. 3. Construction costs will be significantly less expensive because a. It is based on an existing trail system (the trail already exists in many areas) b. It avoids costly elevated bridges currently planned through the wetlands. 4. Less impact on residential housing while continuing to provide an East /West trail. 5. Offers scenic and recreational advantages at a lower cost and impact on residents. 6. Increases use of and traffic to an underutilized resource -- Braemar Park Of course my proposal needs to be further vetted. But it clearly offers a superior alternative to the current proposal. Feel free to contact me if you have questions or need additional information. Regards, Bob Lubar Robert N. Lubar Phone: 612 - 396 -3285 Fax: 866 -521 -6018 Email: rlubarCDcomcast.net Minnetonka Trail System Legend Intercity Connections Off Road (Paved/r-oncrele) Off Road (Rock) On Road ADA Challenge Canoe Landing Parking Restrooris Parks Park Facilities Usleo 4 on Reverse S,de 4. 0 Google Maps Z-- CVO"-" CFI e maps Page I of I Notes red circle drive to shady oak road to city w parkway to shady oak road crossing hwy 212, to flying cloud drive to washington ave littp://iiiaps.goo,,Ie.ct)ili/iiia 'P s? ic= UFF 8&h I=eii&llq=&Il ilea[ -I)r,+Edina,+Fie... 8/24/2010 3 C', Or C!" jvw H."Y reGCVr C., CX 0 14 'IV ?- r , ''•CI * S. � N:? � Q•' 2 2li 9 Q0, r<d Cy V, Il'i" 212 C.x 've. 71, i. 02010 Ga?qle - Map data 02010 GoVe - littp://iiiaps.goo,,Ie.ct)ili/iiia 'P s? ic= UFF 8&h I=eii&llq=&Il ilea[ -I)r,+Edina,+Fie... 8/24/2010 Google Maps Page 1 of 1 l j maps S Notes washington ave to valley view, across 169, south on 169 frontage road, to braemar blvd, to dewey hill road to proposed trail ,e V• a u y x •�O .. _ fi V; Q° era Y q N �lnr ca' Loch VON 3, �D m r, —j fJOdi7p,r r .J ri r 169 / � 1 6 41 'r u-1 • V� w P ? i? 1: tN t 1 fig C3 ii.-ti 1•danh Re .p ti _ T Otdarth Rd Akan, ha L' R • _. V/ N11 iQ } '.N i Sit, $t O Lee Rd 02010 Google - Map data CO2010 Google - http: / /maps.google.com /naps ?ie= UTF8 &hl= en &hq= &hnea M Dt•, +Edina, +He... 8/24/2010 Susan Howl subject: FW: Questions to address with Three Rivers Park SEP 17 2010 From: Bob Lubar [mailto:rlubar @comcast.net] Sent: Monday; September 27, 2010 11:55 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Questions to address with Three Rivers Park To Mayor Hovland and City Council Members During a meeting on August 27, 2010 with Mayor Hovland, the Mayor, suggested that citizens forward questions regarding the proposed regional bike trail to the Mayor and City Council. Below are some of the questions that I would like to see addressed during the upcoming September 29`h meeting. 1. Help me understand the math behind TRPD's strategy of several concurrent capital projects. How will they be able to pay for the operations of these projects well into the future? a. Yes, TRPD can fund capital projects via grants and bond issuance (subject to debt load restrictions). b. Please clarify how TRPD will generate sufficient tax (or other) revenues to service the related debt, pay for anticipated maintenance costs and pay indirect costs associated with the projects. i. TRPD has currently stopped providing cost of living increases and merit increases to its staff. ii. TRPD is proposing to take over several parks within Scott County. Scott County will transfer the existing budget to TRPD but Scott County also acknowledges that is does not have the finances needed to improve the parks as desired. TRPD will make the improvements. How can they (we) afford this proposal'without changing tax levy, limitations? c. Please provide a detailed annual analysis of this projects anticipated direct and indirect epenses for the next 20 years. i. How does the cost of this project compare with similar projects completed by TRPD? ii. Has TRPD ever build an elevated trail through a flood plain? 2. Under what conditions will the city be willing to grant approval to a project that may not begin for several years? a. What assurances can be provided by TRPD that they can and will continue to fund this project for the next 30 + years? L Guaranties to not'press for increased to tax levy limitations? ii. Penalties paid to Edina for delayed construction timelines? 3. What are the consequences of "turning over the property" (granting a permanent or longterm easement) to TRPD? a. What recourse(s) does the city have if the project does not meet expectations? b. What likely action(s) will the city take in the event that TRPD cannot meet its obligations in this arrangement? c. What actions can Edina and its citizens implement if the trail is not being properly maintained? d. What measures will be put into place to assure that debris will not catch between the pilings increasing the risk of flooding? 4. What steps should be taken to protect Edina's interests' if /when the City partners with an agency that cannot meet its obligations. a. TRPD has a reputation of broken promises with residents adjacent to other properties such as the parks surrounding Medicine Lake. 5. TRPD talked about additional trail head amenities (parking, restrooms, picnic areas, scenic overlooks, etc.) in earlier meetings. a. What is the current status of these proposed amenities? b. How will they be paid for - both construct and maintenance costs? c. What is the plan to notify and seek approval from impacted residents ?. 6. Hopkins has taken over much of the policing function for the regional trail in their area. a. . Why was this decision made? b. What would be the cost to the city of Edina if Edina made a similar decision? 7. What communications have taken.place between the cities of Hopkins and Edina regarding the trail, potential impact on property values and corresponding property tax revenues? a. The trail will directly impact several properties that are located within Edina city limits and.are part of the Hopkins School district boundaries (routes 1, 2 and 3). L The Hopkins.School.,district revenue stream may be impacted by decisions on this matter. 8. Why is the Community Assessment Team excluded from the meeting on September 29`n? a. This group was elected, by their neighbors to represent the.neighborhood interests on this matter. b. Despite assurances from both TRPD'and Mayor /City Council,, the CAT has effectively been excluded from this process since its last meeting in May 2010. Regards, Bob Lubar Robert N. Lubar Phone: 612- 396 -3285 Fax: 866- 521 -6018 Email: rlubar(cDcomcast.net 2 SE .N 7 101 From: Annette Horton [mailto:hortongroup @usfamily.net] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 6:17 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: 850.11 Section H To: Heather Worthington, Interim City.Manager Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson . Planning Commissioner Stephen Brown Planning Commissioner Jeff Carpenter Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer Planning Commissioner Arlene Forrest Planning Commissioner Floyd Grabiel Planning Commissioner Julie Risser Planning Commissioner Nancy Scherer Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder Planning Commissioner Kevin Staunton Planning Director Cary Teague Assistant Planning Director Kris Aaker From: John and Annette Horton, 6309 St. Johns Ave., 952 920 -3617 We strongly encourage you to amend Edina Building Code 850.11 Section H. The current 1 foot elevation height restriction may be applicable in some neighborhoods as the Country Club and South Harriet Park areas but it is too restrictive for many neighborhoods such as ours. We certainly support reasonable building ordinances that protect our historic neighborhoods and the architectural integrity of new buildings but 850.11 Section H is too limiting and extreme. It does not take into consideration problems with the large number of aging homes and irregular lots in Edina. We would hope that you amend the code to include language previously suggested by City Planner Cary Teague to -read, "..The first floor elevation may be raised to four feet, only if necssay because of high ground water. or to satisfy flood protection elevation requirements." We believe that this would be a positive way of helping to keep Edina one of the the most desirable places to live in the Twin Cities. Having lived in Edina for over 50 years and always interested in our city government, we know that Edina planning has continually looked out for the community as i ...... . a whole but still has been very flexible when individual needs have arisen. This ordinance is too limiting for the terrain and configuration "of many areas in our community. For the good of Edina, we hope you will amend the existing code. Thank you for all your time, and. efforts! An Invitation To: A Neighborhood Meeting Southdale YMCA YMCA Proposed Remodel and Expansion Project When: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 6:00 — 7:00 PM Where: Southdale YMCA 7355 York Avenue South Project: The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing an approximately 13,000 sf expansion to the existing facility. Construction would begin Spring of 2011 and be completed by the end of the year. Plans of the proposed project will be available for review at the Neighborhood Open House and YMCA representatives will be available to discuss the project and address your questions. Comments or Questions: Please contact Steve Dorgan" at CresaPartners Tel: 612- 373 -0287 Email: sdorgan @cresapartners.com A copy of the proposed site plan is on the back of this invitation. We look forward to seeing you there! I Soutbd.lc YMCA Edina, Miwelola BWBR ARCHITECTS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING IMAGES A5 9/23/10 To: Edina mayor Hovland and members of Edina City Council Attached is a list of questions which would be. prudent for the Edina City Council to address with the Board of Three Rivers Park District at the September 29, 2010 work session: Answers to these questions would provide information to the citizens of Edina in judging the merits of the proposed trail through Edina. Wm Westerdahl 5912 Walnut Dr Edina MN 55436 Priorities Background: TRPD currently has approximately 30 miles (including the Edina section of the Nine Mile Creek Trail) of regional trail in the active planning stage and approximately 10 mileE of trail scheduled for construction in 2010. This is an addition of approximately 40% to the existing trail network. Question: Where does the Edina trail fit in TRPD trail priorities? Cost Estimates Background: TRPD estimates the cost of the Edina trail to be $20 Million dollars, up to $30 million dollars with financing costs. These costs were estimated using previous TRPD construction projects and are likely up to 3 years old. TRPD indicates that construction on the Edina Trail would likely begin in about 2015. Question: What is the likely cost of the Edina Trail if present estimated costs are 8 years old at time of construction? Operations funding Background: Articles by Lauri Blake in the Star - Tribune, and the TRPD 2010 Operations Budget indicate that TRPD is approaching its statutory limit Of .03224% of total market value to fund operations. TRPD has frozen its employees wages in 2010 and 2011. Property values have declined a total of 10% the last two years. TRPD is dependent on the property value levy to provide 84% of its operating revenues. Question: If the property tax levy is barely sufficient to fund present TRPD operations, which include maintenance and safety, how will they be sufficient to cover a planned 40% increase in the trail system as well as an additional Scott County Park? If TRPD is not able to fund maintenance and safety in the future who will be responsible for trail maintenance and safety? . Bonding Background: TRPD bonding capacity is limited to 1/10 of 1% of Total Market Value. An increase would require approval of the voters. Currently TRPD has approximately $75 million dollars in outstanding bonds and bonding capacity is approximately $108 million dollars. Question: Is there sufficient bonding capacity, now and in the future, to fund construction on the planned 40% increase to the trail system? Process Background: The TRPD presentation to the Edina Council called for the creation of a Community Action Team (CAT) comprised of Edina residents nominated and elected by citizens of Edina. The purpose of the CAT was to advise TRPD on the merits of alternative trail routes. The CAT team was prevented by TRPD of introducing any alternative routes that were not approved by TRPD. (No CAT alternatives were approved) This allowed TRPD to control tl selection of alternative routes and prevented any input by Edina Citizens to the selection process. Public meetings held by TRPD included presentation of mixed information contained in both the EAW and the CAT reports. Public comments to these reports were only allowed on the FAW . Question: Will TRPD allow any further alternative routes to be introduced as the route selection process continues? Since the CAT represents ELECTED Edina residents will they be invited to participate in further deliberations on route selection? Where can the public submit comments on the CAT report? Wood Decking Background: The route selection process could result in approximately 6200' of "wood decked timber boardwalk being constructed along the length of the trail. Much of this boardwalk would be constructed in the 100 year floodplain or the Nine Mile Creek Floodway. The boardwalk would be approximately 12' high by 1Twide with wire enclosed railings and two piling every 12'. A structure of this type could be expected to trap debris during flooding which could cause an increase in flood levels and increased maintenance. Question: Has TRPD had experience with a wood decked timber boardwalk located in a stream foodway? Does TRPD have data on noise levels generated by wood boardwalks? Will TRPD have sufficient operational funds to maintain a high maintenance item now and in the future? Who will be responsible if TRPD in unable to maintain the boardwalk? Timing ackground: TRPD has stated that construction in unlikely to begin on the Edina trail before /-015. Question: When do determinations need to be made on routes and trail alignment? When does Edina have to grant an easement to TRPD on the trail corridor? Who is responsible for the trail corridor between the granting of an easement and construction of the trail? Walnut Ridge Park Background: Walnut Ridge Park is classified as a "Play -field Park" It is used extensively for tennis, hockey (children's baseball in sumer), children's play area, La Cross practice and games, and as a neighborhood dog and exercise walking area. It has a paved parking lot and warming house /public toilet building. The Edina trail would pass within 20' of all the play areas and any park access from the north or west would have to cross the trail. Question: Have any plans been made to safely separate the play areas from the trail? Will dog walkers have to share the trail with bikers? Who will pay for the extra maintenance required for the toilets to serve trail users? Has the alternate route that was proposed which would eliminate Walnut Ridge Park and the problems with alternate route 2 been given consideration. To: Edina City Council From: Lawrence Cheng 4505 Bruce Avenue Edina, MN 55424 952 -495 -4505 Subject: Memo Regarding Sidewalk Repair at 4505. Bruce Avenue I -have been a resident and homeowner.in Edina, Minnesota, for the last 1+ years. I grew -up in Edina and my wife and I moved back in August of 2009 in order to start a family. Upon moving back, we purchased a home in the Country Club neighborhood of Edin:A where we now reside. During the purchase of our home, I , was made aware of an assessment that was being levied on the residents in our neighborhood for 'street improvement (No. A -213). I was told that this reconstruction project included both sanitary sewer line work, street lighting work, and streets and sidewalk reconstruction. I believe the work on the Northern portion of Bruce Avenue had already been completed in 2008 and would be safe and sound on our arrival. Upon: moving into our home in early - August of 2009, my wife and I noticed that a pool of water would form in front of our house over the sidewalk (southwestern portion of our property) every time it rained or I watered the lawn. The pool that forms is fairly large (about 5 -6 feet long and covers the entire width of the sidewalk) and was a major nuisance. However, as winter approached, this pool quickly turned to a large sheet of ice and become a major safety hazard. My mother slipped and fell on this ice patch and I have received statements from several of our neighbors that they have also slipped on this same patch of ice - one incident even causing a personal possession (an antique vase) to be dropped and shattered. In light of the recent work that was done and after hearing the same concerns from our neighbors, I immediately tried to contact the Edina City Offices to try to understand what could be done to rectify the situation. I spoke several times to Chad Millner - the project manager for the reconstruction project - as well as other folks on the City staff. During one of these conversations, I was directed to Wayne Houle (City Engineer and Public Works Director) and was told that he would be the right person to decide whether the city could assist in resolving the issue. I have tried several times 'to contact Wayne over the last 8 -9 months, but have unfortunately never received a call back. I have left multiple messages and have spoken to his office's secretary asking as to the best way to proceed. None of my efforts resulted in. a return call from his office. This isn't meant to point fingers at any one person in particular. I do.not know Wayne at all. However, I am including this information in order to express my frustration as a homeowner in getting this matter addressed and resolved. Disappointingly, the problem still remains. Upon further investigation with my neighbors, I have discovered some background on the issue: The problem has apparently existed for several years -prior to the recent reconstruction project. The recent reconstruction project replaced two sidewalk panels in front of my home. However, these two panels are raised higher than the normal plane of the sidewalk due to tree roots that run underneath the sidewalk (see attached photos). These raised panels are immediately adjacent to the pool that forms on our sidewalk and have exacerbated the problem and increased both the length and depth of the pool that now forms. o Multiple neighbors have expressed concern over the ice patch that forms in the winter and have told me that they, too, have slipped on this patch of ice. My immediate neighbor at 4507 Bruce Avenue has also stated that she has tried several times to contact the City Planning Office to discuss the same issue, but has received no,calls back. • One of the two un-re p laced panels over which the pool of water / ice that forms is cracked along the entire length of, the panel (see attached photos) e The two panels that the pool forms over seem16 have settled significantly (see attached photos), which could be part of the cause of the pool of water / ice that forms. The problem is not only a nuisance, but a major safety, hazard in the winter. It becomes a 2" thick sheet of ice that has proven impossible to eliminate by using solar salt or an ice pick. I have certainly tried. Tn addition, it never melts. When the ice itself begins melting during_ warmer days, the water simply stays in the depressed area of the sidewalk and refreezes once..the'temperature'dips again. In faA;1he problem is even more of an issue during these warmer days that result in_a combination of a sheet of ice over the pool of water. In addition, if this issue has been a safety hazard for others, I have to believe -it Js even more -of an issue for the handicapped - which includes my 71 -year old father, who is,also a resident and homeowner in Edina. I did not own our home at the time the recent reconstruction project was being completed and did not have a chance to participate in the evaluation of which sidewalk panels needed to be replaced or whether the work that was ultimately done might cause or exacerbate the above problem. It is clear after speaking to my neighbors that this problem has existed for quite some time and has been exacerbated by the recent reconstruction work that was done. I am writing this memo to formally request that the sidewalk in front of our home be examined and any safety issues or degradation be addressed. I believe that the panels should have been assessed during the recent reconstruction project, included in the effort, and fixed at that time to ensure that any previous settling was resolved and that any safety hazards were eliminated. Attached to this document are several pictures of the area described in this memo. Although they do not do the issue justice, I cannot (and do not want toy wait until the coming winter hits and recreates this safety hazard. My wife is pregnant and due in 6 weeks. As a resident of Edina, a homeowner; and a pending father, I am genuinely concerned about this issue and how it has thus far been addressed. After moving back to Edina and living in the Country Club neighborhood for over a year now, I believe the reconstruction project itself was a general success and the replaced portions of sidewalk around the neighborhood largely seem well done. That said,' I do believe the sidewalk panels in front of my home were missed during this assessment and ask that they be addressed. Please advise as to how I should proceed. Sincerely, Larry Cheng mow n1pni } �t r J Y ` , 1 1. T .. Al e!R. ! �, •F y . • r :ice .4� !� � '. , Photo #2: South - facing view of sidewalk. Includes transition between replaced panels and un- replaced panels. Note higher grade of sidewalk on right side of picture (West side of sidewalk). Also includes view of crack in sidewalk. � �, . � �' � 'Z. , � 1� mss' } ` • � � ! � � � .., .�..G 5'. � _ t� — � �� _� t _.�.'i, � Y t4 "' '�x,,,�4� � �'ar '� ,�. ♦;` i 4- �i: , i . � a a _ � � ' �r � �+► _ a: . _. _ �:. Replaced Panels Photo #4: West - facing view of sidewalk (note large crack in un- replaced sidewalk panel) Photo #5: Full view of cracked panel that has settled f. li Photo #5: North - facing view of sidewalk. Includes transition from replaced panels to un- replaced panels. Note: noticeable level difference between replaced vs. un- replaced panels. End of document 'NA 1= o- Fe 'tAN V 0 • ,NroRppRPTF'O/ lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. -1 DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: OCTOBER 5, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. OCT 15 610 to: Edina City Council edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us John Keprios jkeprios @ci.edina.mn.us from: Diane A Fansler dianefansler@yahoo.com date: October 5, 2010 re: tonight's Edina City Council meeting "to discuss process for Bike Trail proposal" Exactly one year ago today, Oct 5, 2009, Edina Paramedics from Fire Station One saved my life by quickly transporting me with advanced life support to Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Room. I urge you to not deny other Edina residents that same opportunity to live. If Routes 7 and 5F as proposed by ThreeRiversParkDistrict had been in place one year ago, I very likely would not be alive today. Later in this letter I will present significant, accurate information on Routes 7 and 5F that definitively prove that 3RPD has failed to 1- consider decreased safety and 2- denied access to input from legal route residents throughout the process to date (including on CAT and failure to respond to input residents provided within the 30day input periods) while 3- relying on information that is out - dated, incomplete, inaccurate, inconsistent, and biased including both current route and proposed trail specifics such as location, size, components, and costs and 4- failing to correct the numerous, significant errors proven and communicated to them. In fact, if Routes 7 and 5F as proposed by 3RPD were adopted, the entire length of Route 7 would be located .3 miles east on the wrong road, along Tracy instead of VAlleyViewRd (Appendix p128 and presented to StarTribune on 9/29/10) 3 intersecting streets would not be included on Route 7, and the trail would have a gap of no coverage of .4 -.5 mile south of on -ramp Hwy62 on Route 5F. However, since tonight's ECC meeting's agenda item is to discuss process in proceeding with 3RPD's proposal, I offer the following recommendation for your consideration. Please consider that it is more important to get this trail right than to get it now. I firmly believe that 3RPD's proposal has failed to date to present sufficient, accurate, timely facts that would warrant the adoption of their proposal, has failed to sufficiently consider the negative impacts that would accrue from adoption of their proposal, has failed to study viable alternatives, and has been "deductive" rather than "inductive" with 3RPD presenting proposed routes and then attempting to justify them. My proposal for the next step in the process of the BikeTrail: 1- Divide the 14 3RPD segments (routes) among the EdinaCityCouncil members; 2 -who will conduct and record a thorough on- ground information /fact - finding inspection of each route; 3- including the accompanying physical presence and verbal/ document/photographic input of all of the following members 4 -3RPB representative(s) selected by 3RPB, 5- resident(s) who are legally and directly on the selected segment as selected by all residents who are legally and directly on the selected segment (not as selected for the CAT by 3RPD) 6 -Edina Park Board representative(s) as selected by them, 7 -Edina Bike Trail Task Force representative(s) as selected by them, 8 -Edina City personnel with expertise in areas such as finances, engineering, city rules and regulations, etc. 9- additional members to be invited by ECC who have knowledge, expertise, and interest in this specific 3RPB proposal, Edina's current and future bike /walking/recreational facilities, etc. This would meet the expressed goals of "inductive process (Mayor Hovland 9/29/10)," would fulfill the goals and obligations of providing a "clear and transparent process (Mayor Hovland, ECC, Representative Keith Downey, and all of us) ", would resolve the frustrations of impacted, knowledgeable Edina residents that they have been and are being denied input into the process, and would keep the process honest. In addition, I urge the ECC to seek answers from 3RPD on their proposal that are more specific, directly applicable to the routes and designs proposed by 3RPD, and are supported by more than such vague assurances as those presented on 9/29/10 by 3RPD personnel Carlson and Blackstad (including "we can work that out ((numerous issues, problems, and concerns)) during design process," "we will work with Edina to minimize impact on...," "we will resolve residents' concerns about...," "we have a good record pleasing residents," "there is very little crime to be concerned about on our trails," "we have a good record responding to crime and cooperating with local law enforcement," "we can adapt trail design to incorporate," "we're considering several `opportunities' for securing funds," and "having an 'as needed' speed limit works well so we don't require specific speed limits on our trails." Please require 3RPD to present specific applicable responses that directly address these questions. Also, I advise that 3RPD be required to provide answers within acceptable maximum and minimum ranges and standards such as cost over -runs, financing charges, additional expenses to Edina, distance from residences /commercial properties, number of crossings, number of vehicles /properties /driveways etc affected. I urge ECC to carefully and completely consider the 3RPD proposal as one possibility for increasing bike trails and walkways in Edina, but not to be bullied and rushed by their assistance that "3RPD is not interested in studying any other possible route options ... (including) ThreeRivers will never consider routes like those some residents have proposed along Hwy 169 and Hwy 62 corridors because I personally would not want to bike with those poor esthetics, no matter what t he safety issues are (Kelly Grissman 10 /l /]0)," "Edina City Council must select among these 14 segments while connecting point A to point B (Kelly Grissman 10 /l /10)," and "the latest Edina City Council could approve adopting this proposal is early March in order to qualify for federal 80% matching funds (Larry Blackstad 9/29/10)" and "currently 3RPD has a high priority on this trail, near #2,3,or 4, but if EdinaCityCouncil doesn't approve this by early March, we'll put it at the bottom of the list and it would be another 2 years before we could build the trail and we would lose out on these 80% federal matching funds (Larry Blackstad 9/29/10)." I am not a financial expert, but I offer the following for your further consideration on federal funding: 1 -not only is there no guarantee that this project would secure these federal funds, 2 -there is no indication that alternative opportunities would not exist for federal funding in the future, and 3- Blackstad omitted that these STP and TE programs to which he referred offer'maximums of $lmillion and $7 million. Like most Edina residents, I support increasing bike trails and walking paths in Edina. However, it is evident to me that 3RPD's proposal is in their best self - interest alone whereas the Edina City Council's stated interests and responsibilities are first "to provide for the health, safety and well -being of its citizens" (City Code 421.01 and other citations) for current and future residents. And how would adopting 3RPB's Routes 7 and 5F so severely decrease safety as to endanger the lives of residents (as well as trail users, EHSNVMS/EPAC/Playing fields students /personnel /visitors, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, city employees /maintenance personnel, drivers and passengers using both routes and intersecting streets, MTC passengers and personnel, Edina School bus passengers and personnel, utility workers, and private service companies)? 3RPD's proposal for Route 7 is to eliminate the sidewalk on the east side of Valley View Road along the entire length from Antrim connecting with Route 5F, eliminating the shoulder /park lane, and constructing a I Oft asphalt trail (to be shared by bikers going 2 directions, walkers, etc.) with 3ft green areas on both sides of trail to extend to the end of city Right -of -Way. Route 5F (which was revealed for the first time on 9/29/10), is proposed to begin at Bredesen Park, proceed on south side of Olinger through Countryside Park, proceed south on Tracy, traversing Tracy at a point where 10,000 vehicles pass daily, cross Hwy 62 on a bridge to be constructed east of current road bridge, cross 62 entrance ramp, and link with Route 7. (Note .4 -.5 miles are not accounted for on the east side of Valley View Rd where there is no sidewalk, no parking lane, and no even surface; the entire .4 -.5 mile segment would have to be another aerial bridge constructed above 9milecreek, a steeply inclined ravine, and pond.) Please be aware that both ValleyViewRd and Tracy are: 1- classified by Edina as collector roads due to their high traffic volume and use to gather traffic from neighborhood local roads; 2 -are 2 of the 5 streets cited by Edina Police last week for highest speeding violators; and 3 -are already highly congested, including several times daily total stoppage of all traffic along Route 7 for schools including stop -start times. Adopting Routes 7 and 5F would severely narrow both ValleyViewRd and Tracy to one narrow lane each for all traffic (N -bound ValleyView and S -bound Tracy). Limiting to one -lane would 1- prevent traffic to pull over for emergency vehicles, 2- prevent vehicles from making left -hand turns both onto or off ValleyViewRd or Tracy, 3- eliminate shoulder used by MTC buses, who use it for driving as well as stops for 2 routes, and 4- eliminate shoulder use by Edina school buses on the route used by the highest number of Edina school buses in the city. Additional increased dangers would result from the increased congestion resulting in total traffic stoppages and long -lines of congestion in both directions in adherence with State and City laws for Edina School bus stops picking up /dropping off students. There are additional, significant decreased safety issues resulting from FireStationOne and proposed Route 5F, (which was. revealed by 3RPD for the first time on 9/29/10 and has had no input from 'residents directly affected by and most knowledgeable about the route). Route 5F trail would pass within 15ft of FireStation building, including in front of all doors that provide exit/entrance for 2 ambulances and 5 firetrucks up fob 61'long, 12'+ high, 9'+ wide. This would directly endanger Trail users and Fire.S6tion personnel, who„ currently back across the - proposed trail to enter the garage and would result into reduced response times, further endangering the rest of us.cited,above. It would eliminate. or greatly reduce the parking area . provided for ADA and other visitors to the station. At the end of the Fire StationbuiIding, Route 5F traverses Tracy Avenue at a point where 10,000 vehicles pass daily and again blocking station emergency vehicles headed south, east, or west. Then, Route 5F is proposed to cross 62 entrance ramp, within the ramp (which is already frequently congested causing stoppages and blocked traffic along Valley View Rd. Thank you for considering this recommendation. Sincerely, Diane A. Fansler Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:36 PM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl 11 Subject: FW: NO TRAIL THROUGH EDINA OCT 5 ZOp Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and also to John Keprios. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: Bonnie J. Scott [mailto:bsnanatoo @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:28 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: NO TRAIL THROUGH EDINA LET THE PEOPLE VOTE ON IT! NOT JUST THE FEW. OCT 15 2010 Summary Health Department Activity 6529 McCauley Trail Juodis residence On August 4, 20101 was contacted by Hennepin County's Human Services Adult Protection Department and was asked to meet a Social Worker at 6529 McCauley Trail, Edina MN. The Social Worker had requested that an Edina Environmental Health Sanitarian be present to evaluate the interior conditions of the home. Upon arrival, the Social Worker gave me a quick overview. The home is currently occupied by Dr. Juodis, his wife and step daughter. (Mrs. Juodis and her daughter were not present in the home at the time of inspection.) Dr. Juodis has limited mobility due to nerve damage in his back and receives nursing services for his medical needs. Ms. Dunaway requested the presence of a Sanitarian due to the congestion, refuse and animal feces and urine found in the dwelling. I entered the residence and found excessive storage in the hallways, living room, den, dinning room, kitchen, t.v. room (which is the room Dr. Juodis occupies). These conditions made the hallways not easily passable. I also observed that soiled pet pads where on the floor of the dining room and that the dining room carpet was heavily soiled with pet urine. In addition, the carpets in the stairwell, living room, t. v. room, master bedroom, den and basement bedroom were heavily soiled with pet urine, dirt and animal fur. found an accumulation of refuse in the kitchen, on the counters and floors. There were food spills on the floors and counters and outdated food and rotting fruit were found on the counters. The laundry room contained a pile of dirty linen and clothing. The bathroom floors and counters needed thorough cleaning and sanitizing. While visiting with Dr. Juodis one of the pets defecated on the couch. He indicated that the animal was stressed from all the activity. Dr. Juodis indicated the house has eight pets; three dogs and five cats. All animals are kept indoors. I informed Dr. Juodis that Edina City Code only allows for three dogs and or cats total. Dr. Juodis was extremely concerned about this requirement and wanted to know if the City had a process to keep his animals. I informed Dr. Juodis of the process and that Animal Control could contact him and a meeting could be set. A notice of violation of Edina City Code was sent to the Juodis family on August 5, 2010. The notice also included a meeting at City Hall with Adult Protection, Animal Control Officer Tim Hunter and I. Correction for the housing code violations was request for August 16, 2010. August 11, 2010 / Meeting at City Hall A meeting was held at Edina City Hall with the Juodis family all present, Adult Protection Social Worker and Animal Control Officer Tim Hunter and I. The meeting outlined what was expected for compliance with Edina Code and prioritized the areas to clean. Officer Hunter reviewed the steps in applying for a pet permit, clarified the code and commented that pet permit has not been issued in over ten years in Edina. The family expressed concerns about predatory animals Page 2 Summary Health Department Activity 6529 McCauley Trail Juodis residence attacking the dogs if they were outside. Officer Hunter commented that in his opinion the animals were not in immediate danger from predatory animals while being outside. Monday, August 16, 2010 at 2 p.m. /Home Inspection. The inspection found major improvement with many corrections made to meet the requirements of Edina City Code. The kitchen was cleaned. All outdated food had been removed; the floors and counters had been cleaned. The laundry room had been cleaned; the main bathroom had been cleaned. The storage in the hallway, t.v. room and living had been removed. The family reported that they had hired a company to help with the organizing, sorting, refuse removal and cleaning. The cleaning people worked ten hours on Friday and 12 hours on Saturday. A dumpster had been contracted and was filled in the driveway. The family did not have enough time to address all the code issues: the master bedroom, and bathroom had not been addressed and the carpets had not been cleaned. Since the family had accomplished code compliance in the kitchen, bathroom, aisle way and laundry room areas an extension to September3, 2010 was granted due to a scheduled medical procedure needed by Dr. Juodis. On September 2, Dr. Juodis requested additional time due to other conflicts that had developed for the family. An extension was granted to Friday, September 10, 2010. A follow up inspection was conducted on Monday, September 13, 2010. Monday, September 13, 2010 I conducted an inspection along with Adult Protection Social Worker. The master bedroom and bathroom had been cleaned and the carpets on the upper level (except the three season porch) had been adequately cleaned. The family has contracted with Bark Busters to aid in training of the dogs. The area where the pet pads had been set out was reduced to a 3 ft square area and the family was taking the dogs outside for regular bathroom use. There are cat boxes within the home and they look like the animals are using them and the family is maintaining them. The basement bedroom, stairway and the three season porch are the outstanding code violations and a compliance date for the end of October was discussed. October 4, 2010 A final inspection was conducted. The Juodis family has addressed all code violations that had been cited by the Health Department. Compliance has been met in regard to the violations of City of Edina Code 725. Page 3 Summary Health Department Activity 6529 McCauley Trail Juodis.residence The family has made significant improvements to their living environment. The family has reduced the amount of storage and clutter in the upper level. The refuse is being managed appropriately. All the surfaces had been cleaned and sanitized as directed. All the work had been addressed in a prompt and timely fashion without excessive delays. - In addition, accommodations had been added to assist-Dr. Juodis. He has acquired a hospital bed and hand rails in.the bathroom. The Adult Protection Social Worker indicated they would not be scheduling any further visits at this time. Respectfully submitted, Solvei Wilmot, R.S. Assistant Sanitarian Edina Health Department Susan Howl Subject: No Parking Resolution ''t .� ' Dear Council members, `15 'Enid As a member of the BETF and ETC, I have concerns about the proposed bike lanes on 58th Street. The bike lanes proposed for 58th Street are substandard in width and do not meet minimum Mn /DOT bike lane design guidelines. The 3.5' lanes also do not meet the standards provided for bike lane width in the city's Comprehensive Bike Plan. Please try to imagine an 8 year -old -child riding a bike in a space just slightly wider than a yard stick. As residents have testified, this is a neighborhood full of young families. If we want residents of all ages and experience to be able to bike safely, we need to design for a wide range of user ability. Bike lanes that are too narrow are not a safe option for most riders, especially kids. Please direct staff to come back with alternative bikeway designs. There are several options that could be considered: 1) Wide Outside Lane. An example of this is shown in figure 4 -3.6 of the Mn /DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual for streets without curb and gutter and appears in the table on page 116 of the city's Comprehensive Bike Plan. Or, Shared Lane Design, which is shown in section 4- 3.7.2. The bike lanes in these designs are not striped. The benefit is that bikes continue to ride as close to the right hand side of the road as is practicable but are not restricted to a too - narrow bike lane. There is research to show that motorists pass closer to cyclists in striped lanes than in bikeways that are not striped. 2) Narrow the travel lanes to 10 ft. to allow for 4.5' bike lanes. These lanes would still be substandard in width, but because there is no gutter pan, the full 4.5' would be usable where the pavement edge is in good condition. The narrower travel lanes may also help to lower the design speed of the street, which may bring the 85th % speed closer to a 25 mph speed limit. 3) Hold off on bike lanes until 2014 when the street is scheduled for reconstruction and consider alternatives at that point, which may include slightly widening the road and adding sidewalks to create first -class facilities for walking and biking. In the meantime, look at other provisions in state statute that may allow the Council to lower the speed limit to 25 mph. For example, investigate whether MS 169.14, subd. 2(a)(7) can apply: "25 miles per hour in residential roadways if adopted by the road authority having jurisdiction over the residential roadway." Neither the BETF nor ETC have had the opportunity to weigh in on this issue. Staff requested a quick decision on the bike lanes to be able to stripe them still this fall. The best decisions are not made under hurried circumstances. Please table the No Parking resolution for now and refer the question to the BETF and ETC for a recommendation. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Jennifer Janovy Resident Susan Howl aephen K Brown, CCIM Edina Planning Commission 9512- 837 -8517 (w) 612- 805 -2232 (cell) RE4 6'mu OCT 0 4 2010 I have reviewed the information that has been submitted by Ms. Hoganson. While 1 am uncertain as to whether this is an issue about the information that i presented earlier,, or my position as it relates to Neighborhood Associations from the League of Women Voter's, my position on both remains unchanged. Based upon the data that.-Ms. Hoganson provided in her document today, 1 have provided additional data that will amplify my earlier findings. Astackground, in the document that 1 provided at the Planning Commission meeting,, and -which was forwarded to Council (attached) the following data and findings were taken directly from Ms. Hoganson's Petition, something 1 clearly inquired about in detail our Planning Commission meeting. My position then, as it would be in any project evaluation, is that if a significant number of people have a similar opinion, I want to understand it; and factor it into my decision making. To summarize my initial findings, 1 took the information from. the survey provided by Ms. Hoganson at the time. I felt the geography in that sample was too broad; and chose to focus on the neighborhood directly adjacent to the subject property. Based upon the information she provided, using information from Hennepin County, this is the summary: • 85 signatures from the area identified in Red. Those 85 signatures, came from 64 households in the indetified area. ® There are 932 residential parcels in the identified market area in red. • Using 64 households and 932 residential parcels, that equates to 5.87% opposed. • If you want to use the 85 signatures (which would be inaccurate) it would still equate to only 9.12% opposed. This would be an innaccurate approach because if you, want to evaluate the number of residents, you would need to account for multiple people at each address, which could easily double the 932 households to reflect multiple adults living at each dwelling. Doing so, and using a 2X factor, there. would be approximately 1864 potential residents in the trade area, which would only further dilute the percentage of opposed to approximately 4.56 %. Attached in Ms. Hoganson's information, is a map where she has chosen to use a larger geographic area to incorporate the entire number of people opposed. This is a larger geography than the one I focused on at the Planning Commission meeting. l warned, that in using the larger geographic area, my analysis and finding would only be magnified. 1 have attached a revised map that incorporates the 285 unique households provided by Ms. Hoganson. I have created a "custom boundary" around these 285 households to create the revised market area that 1 believe Ms. Hoagnason is indicating represents the neighborhood. Using this -'revised map, l have removed all non - residential parcels from the market area, and have included only the residential parcels in the revised trade area. Doing so, the following is a summary of those findings: ® 285 signatures from the revised area (see map) ® 13,516 residential parcels • Using 285 households and 13,516 residnetial parcels, that equates to 2.11% of the people in this trade area are opposed. • (Technically, 1 do not believe the percentage is even 2.11% because 1 believe the 285 signatures from the petition includes multiple signatures from certain addresses. 1 did not have that information from Ms. Hoagnson to verify, but that was the way it was in the original information. Therefore, this represents the highest possible percentage of those opposed because it gives additional weighting where it technically should not. If you were use the 2X factor, like was outlined above, the percentage drops to just 1.05 %. As a point of cross validation to the numbers that I used in my assessment, the United States Postal Service indicated that, as of June 2010, there ore 14,518 residential addresses in an area that is almost identical to the custom boundary I created using Ms. Hoganson's data (see attached map). Technically, the USPS trade area which is used is actually smaller than the area 1 have used for the custom boundary based upon Ms. Hoganson's information, . which would indicate there are actually more residnetial addresses parcels than I used in these numbers. If this is the case, which 1 believe that it likely is, it would only dilute the percentages further. Fellow Commissioners and City Council members, my purpose in conducting this exercise was to validate objectively the information provided by the neighborhood itself, to support their claims. This exercise was conducted to assess if a large percentage of the people felt similarly, one way or the other. It was a tool for me to help cut through the emotions of the debate between the parties. It was simply one component of the information I used to make my decision, which was very helpful for me. 1 would point out that 1 have not received any calls or inquiries from Ms. Hoaganson regarding the data I provided, nor have I received any calls from anyone from the "neighborhood" to discuss it. I met with them to discuss and understand there concerns about the project after the preliminary approvals by the PC and CC, and have heard nothing from them since. I am happy to discuss the information I have provided with anyone, staff, CC or neighborhood. But i stand behind the information I provided then and today, as well as what it represents related to this particualr project. As for my position on Neighborhood Associations, 1 will simply add that Ms. Hoganson is correct in offering that I do not believe in making Neighborhood Associations a formal part of our city process. i believe they are an invaluable way to create community from a social and neighborhood awareness perspective. However, in my o ip nion" this project is a clear example of why they do not work. Respectfully, Steve From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunno @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:48 AM To: Arlene Forrest; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter; Julie Risser; Karwehn Kata; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy N. Scherer; Steve Brown Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please Correct Record: 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS, NOT 64, OR 4.45 TIMES MORE THAN WAS REPORTED, 23.5% GREATER THAN THE 7% REPORTED Importance: High Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and also to the Planning Commission members. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:04 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please Correct Record: 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS, NOT 64, OR 4.45 TIMES MORE THAN WAS REPORTED, 23.5% GREATER THAN THE 7% REPORTED Importance: High Please delete the previous email from Sun 10/3/2010 8:21 PM on the same subject and replace it with this one. Please forward this email onto Commissioner Brown, Other Planning Commissioners, Mayor and City Council Members. Thank you. Respectfully, for the record, and since this project is still in process with Park Dedication, TIFF, NMWSD, residents are still concerned with the misunderstanding stemming back to Commissioner Brown's Map, coupled with the concluding remarks made at the end of public comment section at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting re Shelter Corp /Colonial Church Project, and again, these remarks resurfaced again when Commissioner Brown was asked about what he thought about Neighborhood Assns, at the League of Women Voters Forum; thought it may be helpful to provide additional support of the Concerned Residents Opposed to the Proposed Project. As mentioned above, this project is still in process with the Park Dedication Fee waiver being requested, TIFF Money requests, and it has to get approval from the Nine Mile Watershed District and we want to make sure we do our part to present facts accurately, and hope we can all be operating from the same facts.. We would like to show you that there is support for 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS, or 4.45 times higher the number reported. We were committed to be thoughtful and respectful and were not trying to misrepresent the support of Concerned Residents in anyway. I am sure you can understand how remarks that were made could be construed as offensive to all the hard work of many concerned citizens. We also understand the binder had a lot of information to plow through and it may be difficult to sort it all out. Most of us have full time jobs and we can only spend so much time on these things. Thank you for taking the time to review our information below. Also, if you have any other ideas that you think would make our efforts more productive now and in the future, please let us know. As an easypoint of reference, please find the two links with the video spots indicated to support the map and remarks we are responding too. 1.11311anning Commission June 30, 2010: http: // Edina .granicus.com /MediaPlayer.PhP ?view id =3 &clip id =1001, (spot on video 6:01:14), Commissioner Brown references, "932 households are impacted in this area, represented in the red area (on the first attachment map), 85 signed petitions, representing 64 households, or 7% of the neighborhood. Then Mr. Brown had remarks that appeared to indicate that we were misrepresenting the support. The concerned residents of the Neighborhood Group, their attorney had ever seen the map, and were not able to comment on the map since it was presented after the public comment section. 2. MN League of Women's Voters: http: // edina .granicus.com /MediaPlaver.php ?view id =3 &clip id= 1052 &publish id= &event id= (spot on video 50.57) And more recently, Commissioner Brown's video taping at the League of Women Voters where he states, doesn't support Neighborhood Assns. "had recent experience where people represented that they were the neighborhood, but after research and investigation found out they were not" Our "group" represent the the single family home owner residents who received state required notice within 1,000 ft, and people beyond 1,000 ft that are concerned. We are not part of any Neighborhood Assn, nor have any plans to become one. We were opposed to the proposed project for comp plan reasons, zoning laws, and we consider the process to be unfair. The impacted neigbhors were given 20 days notice from 12.8.09 and the development application was submitted 12.28.09, when our City Staff was working with the Developer and Church some 18 months or so longer. On a $40 million project, this is just not realistic for a neighborhood or any other group to vet this size of a project in this short time frame. CORRECTION: THERE WERE 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS AND NOT 64, OR 4.45 TIMES MORE THAN WAS REPORTED, or 30.5% vs the 7 % reported. Would this info have made any difference? EXPLANATION: You can see the snapshot of the maps below, or a larger version in the 1st ATTACHMENT OF COMMISSIONER BROWN'S MAP Labeled EDINA COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP ELECTRONIC PETITIONS. It appears Mr. Brown may have picked this information out of the Binder from only one section. We don't know how these numbers were determined as there were 116 responses in the Binder under the Electronic Petition Section, but understand there may some people from the same household, and others may be outside of the "red" area. 'As it says in the binder, these electronic petitions were taken 3 days prior to give a sense of people were currently weighing and were never intended to imply that this was the listing of all the unique households opposed to this project. The supporting information to substantiate the unique households of Concerned Residents of the Countryside Neighborhood Group are indicated below. Residents like to provide their support in different ways and that is why different modes of support were made available. We had electronic petitions, manual petitions, yard signs, website forms, and financial contributors. As a result of all of these methods of support, we have over 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT. The unique households from all these methods were inputted into the Microsoft Map program as represented in attachment 2. The information came from the information included in the binders provided to each Planning Commission Member and City Council. And the listings were emailed to each of you too. 1. We are not or never claimed to be a Neighborhood Association. We never discussed being a neighborhood association. We were solely concerned single family home owners that received state required notice as required by State Law within 1,000 feet. There were 161 single family households that received notice, the majority of which are opposed to the proposed Shelter /Colonial Project. There are other people beyond 1,000 feet that also are opposed. 2. p7 - p72 Electronic Petitions - there were 116 responses, and to date we have 154 UNIQUE Households from this mode. 3. p145 - p154 Yard Signs - Kevin and Anne McCoy summarized this report and their compiled the list of 184 households, and 64 signs were not tracked per se. You all received emails from Kevin and Anne McCoy a few days before June 30, 2010, and copies of these were also include in the binder for your review. 4. p155 - p184 Manual Petitions. Kevin and Anne McCoy also sent you all an email, and the supporting documents were again copied and included in the binder for your review in. Not everyone has computers so this method was still important. 5. Website forms and financial contributors, provided by Christine Henninger were also included in the summary count of unique households. 6. Some people were involved in multiple modes, however, we summarized the UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS and they TOTAL 285 HOUSEHOLDS. 7. There were additional households that when learned more what was happening, were opposed to the project as proposed. The represent people outside the 1,000 feet, because they are concerned with traffic, park usage, infrastructure impacts, zoning precedent and comp plan issues. Here are some visual snapshots of the attachments. See larger versions in the attachments. COMMISSIONER BROWN'S MAP HE SAYS HAS 64 HOUSEHOLDS Mr. BROWN'S LEGEND Concerned Residents of COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD MAP OF 285 HOUSEHOLDS 5 i StaiPS 285 Edina HouFch Fids 10 N ;al a +�► a aMnare LA at A:w ro H tK 4s 8 M St W 24 WO Wont 47 ;40 btlh 61 rt'ricl;19M � ' � � t 7&. ?ra'?:: ui v ; T� lib '� �`,•,_. St vv 21 IS -.a W 0541,' "Ifrf A 1 ��t a'1 ++ yVq.y a' !— +t 1 4 3 ac - r.. �, S t. �B�BtFt) ;-s - Edina Ccun(gside NeighbEwheod &Iaup's Etatctonic PaLlion Nteit3iiil,�7rftoti�d AWrrejirr;gte?y 932 houictwids within the nkjhborkIjaW 85 signe-d putitictts fmm 64 hwsehWs Mthin the rtsighb*rnoor; Apprusin*tcAyr 7% at the tiousshoids in thrr ra,ghbort ad signed ttte petition 4 Q.Y t1 11i.Mt There are many lessons learned that we are willing to help in anyway to help things work better. Please call upon us if we may be of further assistance. Thank you for taking the time to read through the information and consideration of changing the record as you deem appropriate. Thank you for your all that you do for our City! Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place 952 - 926 -1763 0 Steve Brown Planning Commission e,er -e Mw+un In y °5 .ire w Wi Flald t .k�aw k�. 5 f w. orn s, < _ 4 i T ei d o 6i i a 6i 10' 6 J r P.nld Paarkk N J ,,,s. i W.Ws+ ' < rd, .• 5 a h 9t W inwv�nn o•.a .fnr.y . - - fS ] .. do . , :•• QdM Crake - Sh.dy ;; P•R, s 1~ kl if Sri. PuN s+n 5tw I O g l� -- 7 i e G 1 _ i j;t f i n 3 K Y f i d u; st . an.rra ne +' € a � - scw sr w u. L"J ParN C'r i• � i X01 `a - k Sam S,w P.,NSawAw bran Ha W Kr.n n) p6 E sawNW ' g `n.op ^ �acsa Oa.non e y1'Q y j t LJaw can s, t kc" cw �� -- wane sr '- d ,. �. � ; s+w 2 e,a jilSl ... •pr ,. 1 i ._.. Par• __�.� < Y W61c 5. .- 0�, { w legend .n - ea, s+ SnoHdan m W6 sl G Pa k Proposed Location V V izz:7 Original Neighborhood _ ` �' - _y <WlW Broader Neighborhood wee 6• a_ - 51< r -- BryerH Lake d� weans; .. ti A�- {° t s �G.Mrda "'�h5' Residential Parcels ;1 �K. 0ui - �'.IAcre1 r wao,rs sr 13,51Q parcels that are defined r [31 < E L;n as residential accordrig to 1Y ti'C �' hQ, < C.nlannW HIII 3' Hennepin County V� 5tW mar � at of Jill- ,1001 E C �lyaar :/ned ( o L.ka �O+ - L kaa Park 5 � W).,n 5` S 0 Erne E,­ Park N m <' � Y MR" r r..r. -. ... r. �,M�... r.�.�3:..�rar.�..�r i �j v. r..• �.... ... s.. r�+.. r� .r....�.r.r..............Kr_r. �,rT. T � i � ' Steve Brown Planning Commission Steve Brown Planning Commission Susan Howl OL.T G �di0 )ear Denise Fryzek: Hello, I'm writing on behalf of the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF), a volunteer citizen- based group that works with residents and City staff & elected officials to promote and support bicycling, Patti cularly the City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Thanks for your inquiry. I realize you may-have had other response to your message, so please pardon me if someof this information is duplicated. One of our council members forwarded your message to the attention of the BETF, so I wanted to do my best to respond: 1. Multi- use trail: The proposed Three Rivers Park District trail project. is specifically a multi -use regional trail. The proposed regional multi -use trail would accommodate both pedestrian and bicycle use. The findings from the 2006 needs survey can be applied in this situation because the survey asked about walking and biking trails jointly and the trail provides joint opportunities for. walking and biking. If you are interested in more details about the survey, you could contact John Keprios, Park & Recreation Director through the Edina Mail, 2.1 Safety: I agree safety is an important matter for all users of the road. I appreciate your caution as you use the road. Edina staff and elected officials also share your concern for safety. As Chair of the BETF, ,we support this through educational opportunities such as. community service messages on Channel 16, facilitating bicycle rodeos at schools, leading monthly skills rides, leading community rides, and speaking at events...just a few examples -- all to address the very important need for bicycle safety. 3. - Rules /Statutes: Yes, bicyclists do have statutes to know about and follow, just as motorists do on our roads. Generally all bicyclists have the same rights and duties. on the road as motorists. This is true regardless of age or "style," as you mention. The State of MN has rules which are linked from our www.BikeEdina.org site in the Commuting area. Your note reminds me we should move this statute to the main page near the top -- thank you. Here is a direct link to MN statute for bicycle operation, 169.222. To help educate others about these laws, I think, it is important to be aware of them, practice using them, and take opportunities to help others know about them too. Thank you for your questions and please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the BETF or my comments above. Kirk Logan Johnson Chair, Bike Edina Task Force Kirk.johnson @LoganLogic.com (612) 916 -9966 (Cell) From: Denise Fryzek [ mailto :denise.fryzek@hotmaii.com] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Proposed Bicycle Trail through Edina Hello City Council, I attended the meeting of the Edina City Council and the Three RIvers Park Board members recently at the South View Middle School. Would like to give you my thoughts from listening to this piece of the process in determining if and where a bike route might go. As a citizen of Edina I want to say that I support a bike route going through Edina and connecting to the Three RIvers bike routes that are already available, however I would support the safest route possible for all residents. I have two main thoughts. One thing that I noticed from the presentation is that it is not apparent to me that the residents of Edina actually want a bike route. The data that was presented is very misleading. THe main point from the data is that residents want "walking and biking" opportunities. With these two activities lumped together into one category we really don't know the breakout of each of them. We don't know if walking is desired, biking is desired or both walking and biking is desired. I don't doubt that both are desired but in what ratios? Studies are often designed to benefit the opinions one is trying to capture. It's important to be able to "read" a study objectionally. The other point I would like to bring up is of safety. This is my main concern. As a resident who does a fair amount of driving back and forth through the community, in the past couple of years I have become a very cautious driver and it is because I am very much afraid of hitting a cyclist. On a daily basis, as I drive around town, I look twice and three times about me to be sure I don't hit a cyclist. I believe we have to be more proactive in considering safety. With more and more cycles on the road, we must consider the safety of the cyclist and how the cyclists and cars share the spaces. I am afraid that if we don't give the cyclists a more separate place to ride then we will have more difficulties managing the safety of the cyclists mixed in with the cars. This brings me to another thought. It seems as if there is a wide range of bicycling styles these days. I wonder if there is a set of bike rules that cyclist should be following and if so how would they know about them? We have training and laws regarding driving motorized vehicles, does the State of Minnesota have any rules about cyclists and can we do some educating regarding them? Thank you, Denise Fryzek 952 - 928 -9078 den ise.fryzekCd) hotmail.com Kirk Logan Johnson Kirk.johnson @LoganLogic.com (612) 916 -9966 (Cell) Susan Howl Subject: FW: 9 Mile Creek alignment LU OCT 0 2010 From: Alihul [mailto:alihul @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 9:53 AM To: Lynette Biunno; KGrissman @threeriversparkdistrict.org; KirkJohnson @LoganLogic.com Subject: 9 Mile Creek alignment Edina City Council Members and Park Board Members- I have been a member of the 3 Rivers CAT group for the past 2 years. I must commend 3 Rivers Parks staff for their efficiency, professionalism, and willingness to provide all requested information to a fairly demanding and mostly hostile group. As a member of the 3 Rivers CAT group representing the BETF I have concerns about the proposed plan to allow only CAT group members to make comments to the Park Board regarding the proposed alignment of the 9 Mile Creek Trail. The CAT group has been meeting for more than two years. In a good faith effort to address the concerns of the CAT group the 3 Rivers Parks District paid $75,000 for the EAW. They have spent in excess of $100,000 in meetings and research to produce the 130 page CAT team analysis of the proposed alignments, which includes a section in which each property owning member was allowed to have their individual comments published. The CAT group has been heard from, and heard from again. At the recent joint 3 Rivers/ Edina City Council meeting it was decided that the Edina Park Board would be asked to make a recommendation on the trail alignment at a meeting in which public comment would not be allowed. Now a plan is being floated to allow CAT group members to make a presentation to the Park Board. This idea disregards the pledge you all have made to conduct City business in a transparent manner with input from all community members. To hold a meeting of the Park Board and allow only members of a specific special interest group to testify is a despicable failure of transparency which you each should be embarrassed to be a part of. Each segment representative on the CAT group represents about 15 property owners, and there is no guarantee that they actually are presenting the views of everyone on their segment. There are 13 segment representatives for people who live along the proposed route, and one representative for the biking community through a BETF representative. There are no representatives for the remaining 48,000 people who live in Edina, people who would use the trail for walking and other activities, and one BETF member certainly can't represent the extremely large and diverse interests of cyclists who could use the trail- people ranging from 2 -90 years old and live in Ediina and in neighboring communities. Its time to be the leaders you pledged to be when you ran for office, it is time to treat the opions of the remaining 48,000 residents of the City with equal consideration. You need to follow the process you announced at the joint meeting last week, allow the Park Board to make a recommendation at a meeting free of input from community members, then hold a public hearing at the City Council level and allow input from everyone. Alice Hulbert October 5, 2010 Tim Hunter Edina Animal Control 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association VIA HAND DELIVERY Re: City of.Edina Pet Permit Application for Dr. Edward & Sandra Juodis 6529 McCauley Trail West, Edina, MN 55439 Our File No. 44700.2 Dear Mr. Hunter: Enclosed for the Council's consideration, please find copies of additional documents supporting the pet permit application for Dr. Edward & Sandra Juodis in the above - referenced matter. We respectfully request that each City Council member read the enclosed correspondence while considering the Juodis's application for a pet permit under Edina City Ordinance § 300.15. We appreciate your time and attention to this matter. 0 Kristin B. Heebner Attorney At Law P: (612) 877 -5381 F: (612) 877 -5034 heebnerk @moss- barnett.com KBH /cjco Enclosures 1671958x1 4800 WELLS FARGO CENTER 1 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4129 13:612- 877 -5000 F:612- 877 -5999 W: moss- barnett. corn s s s - Z. To whom It may -concern /City Coundl Edina members, I am the sister of Sandra Juodis. You may think my opinion of the Juodis' family predicament is biased and, in fact, h is. My sister, It can be said without any hesitation, is the most generous and truly caring person I have ever known. She is a full time caregiver to her husband (who is a cancer survivor following radical resection of a sacral tumor that has destroyed his nenrous supply to his lower extremities), to heir daughter, who has Asperger syndrome and to our elderly Mother who lives 45 minutes away. half the year. .Saridra ".runs the entire-household unaided. No maids. No assistance of any kind and fio . the detriment of her own personal health. The family has adopted .their cats and dogs over-the years. These Animals have been a form of therapy: to all the members of the family, making their days a bit brighter. Each one of them has benefited from each and oyery pet for as many. as one rt n think of. On 'some days the animals-may be else only good things in their.lives:.How Sandra rrisnagas to.00pe with all tf�e complications that`sbeihi to hilt her Overy day is unimaginable to me. When it was dem:ended theitt.she reorganize and.clean her home, she*did so with, the speed..and efflidancy.of an exec uf€ve.manager. Her home has-been, cleaned and her animals are undergoing r6odriditioni ig trWribig for the'pottytraining and barking:... This has corns at no small .expense "to this family that lives on'Ed's disability:insumnce (which by the Way is taxed): l hope you will take Sandra's immediate complianoe with - your orders into consideration. She has done all that is humanly possible to keep her entire " famliy° iota : . Sincerely, Kristina Gedgaudas- McClees, MD. 1011110. . Y , � l s s s - Z. To whom It may -concern /City Coundl Edina members, I am the sister of Sandra Juodis. You may think my opinion of the Juodis' family predicament is biased and, in fact, h is. My sister, It can be said without any hesitation, is the most generous and truly caring person I have ever known. She is a full time caregiver to her husband (who is a cancer survivor following radical resection of a sacral tumor that has destroyed his nenrous supply to his lower extremities), to heir daughter, who has Asperger syndrome and to our elderly Mother who lives 45 minutes away. half the year. .Saridra ".runs the entire-household unaided. No maids. No assistance of any kind and fio . the detriment of her own personal health. The family has adopted .their cats and dogs over-the years. These Animals have been a form of therapy: to all the members of the family, making their days a bit brighter. Each one of them has benefited from each and oyery pet for as many. as one rt n think of. On 'some days the animals-may be else only good things in their.lives:.How Sandra rrisnagas to.00pe with all tf�e complications that`sbeihi to hilt her Overy day is unimaginable to me. When it was dem:ended theitt.she reorganize and.clean her home, she*did so with, the speed..and efflidancy.of an exec uf€ve.manager. Her home has-been, cleaned and her animals are undergoing r6odriditioni ig trWribig for the'pottytraining and barking:... This has corns at no small .expense "to this family that lives on'Ed's disability:insumnce (which by the Way is taxed): l hope you will take Sandra's immediate complianoe with - your orders into consideration. She has done all that is humanly possible to keep her entire " famliy° iota : . Sincerely, Kristina Gedgaudas- McClees, MD. 1011110. . To whom it may concern, Edina Qty.Counsel, My name is Sherece Lamke, I have been a friend of the luodis family for 25 years. I live close.to Sandra's elderly mother, whose house she takes care of when her mother. is -away for half the year.. When her mother is home Sandra takes care of many of her :needs. She also is'dealing with many medical issues related to her husband's cancer survival as well that. has.`her driving him to the Mayo regularly. -Sandra has -an incredibly kind heart She's had tio. deal with a lot of loss in the last few years.. Starting with -her husband's illness, -and.the loss of her father.. I'Ve seen.Sandra handle that and still care for her child in a. way'that has helped 'her, despite suffering from a mild form of autism,' succeed and .-this fall she began college; Sandra.had readied :her parents home when they returned each year:from Florida and doe more caregiving of 'her Mother Since her Father's sudden :death a few years. ago. . We share a love of��nimals. I know how much joy animals, can bring to a person and. SandWt:animals are well cared for- and very loved. No .complaints. "have been made -by neighbors regarding the. animals in Sandra's care. They: do not roam the streets or do their-business in others people's yards.. These animals simply bring love _and caring to a family that really needs them and the happiness.they bring.. Please let-this family stay. intact. Thank you for your 'consideration, Sherece Lamke E'.d T9SOEE6ZS6 e'4osausitW Jo R'4ts.Jantun Wd00 :S OIOZ i0 140Q To Whom It May..Concem- i I'm writing this letter —not simply because .Sandra .Juodis happens to be my sister --but mouse I see just cause in supporting her efforts to keep her entire family intact. I am,. of course referring in part to her four - legged .; . family members When I say this.. . There canm be no question-that Sandra .provides a loving, caring home for herpets acid that'they are beyond well. cared .fdr. Where the' lire of her family.has tieen: "40100. with undue Stress and�tragedy it is the.�four- legged family members that help prpvide an environrrment of unconditional ove - and healing affection for all. that is so badly. needed. My sister; in particular - JS in spec ial need :of the r:Oollective companionship since :rt. is;she that bears the.bivnt of a tFerrte burdens of responaibility and' sre her. stress: relief, uncaridonal love- :and a source of.rar joy in her.:l'rfe:. To say ... that Sandra is consciet'tious and responsible: enough. to, care.for all -of her pets and her fdmil in an exceptional way is: truly an understatement.. . Amidst the smothering demands on.Sandy; she stepped.up Possible. effort to comply with the considerable demands that social services, laid- out for her and rnodified her home and even her pets' behavior to comply with their retluirements. If ever someone. deserved to receive special . conslderotl6n:16r her small request'(to .keep all her four - legged family members together at' home) Sandra Juodis has made an exemplary case. :Sincerely: Nora T. Gedgaudas i RR hodisFamily Petition October I, 2010 To Whom It May Goncean: I am a IMB time friend of Sandy. Juodi& We bave bees Mods since (1979) when. wece sc oho is high school. Sandy has : been a truly devoted friend &mugh the ye" Ad is a t urn 8lie is very lovimg and .giving with it hag of gold. Sind .ttie day I me;t Saa�dy,.I hat► bed tarty lioatored t1>gE she has btu 'a Mend far so inky ye u ; fad . tia I am vely (d.MMI . . - ; ..... Also;: lnr family is wer j� foriu. She Las -bed a � aaE .e�ply. to het - hu and �ir7io is a c�pua survivor, butbet,dwo daadbirm On "A l ' bisem, is:tlteeile treiv�er tc.ai1, eta with no . nnsy 5 besitatialn. f if ► is veay in po et Whet aid the °Fa y" tills each. sad every of llreir P T1ie<+e ids a apuaal lOe. and bon4 than mines l Sandy, Ed . anti tape fbr 466 � tiroa�aiaaal L. �'!�y pravid a otiat lire, .:.: *erapy i*cbss: eaal clitnes`.'i�aY deg ew �L tua� .tidp ttr� �vc7y�►1► ... ng � � foY erg" �- IepriW?de- ai►dui t�riq:go�d mo�c� �af+e.aiidto�sof .. .. Whem enideid: $$ally : witorit hesitaii they. ... to dean aad �gam2, . Cb *C. took the nip i e y: 3o* &nd Fs�'a is Qiriiv n and dam ' wotlurRg y pelg an `potty ena behavior: uninnn Ba endxatis hpc dam ;6� tW can do thlrs6 theifF , To Whom It May Concern: I am the niece of Sandra Juodis and I am �viiting you: on :behalf of her and-her family in: regards to-the animals in thei�rhouseh household. The thought that anyone would want, to separate thew-animals" from. this .caring home is a shock .to me. I understand that the ordinance in question limits the number of animals per household, and. as a law student I assure you I Have the utmost respect forits existence. If :my understanding is coffect, the ordinance. is is glace not only to prevent unhealthy and unsafe conditions for the animals . and'the.public but to sp a neighbors from the n.uisa . of a: . howbold overran with unruly animals.. As: a futune 4niintal fights. ' attamey, .I am in . 'sappoit of what this ordinance hopes to accomplish. It i� c9 d v�ith.tl�e:best' #aam, however, in s. situation -Y think the gtrlct.enf6rcement of it would he of great detriment: too this family. and d e a imW. . .� ..... .eve rya e am 'aha owned by:the.; . J. uodis famay,is a rescue:. Son1e wer6. z4optad fr mi a sl tes and some wen in' a far spore senQtts sense. T�vo of the three dogs were very ill when they c the into the: lives of this family. e w a &at mold. vi y ask foraheir money back for reoei • a "bad = t" Not.:' ving: produc aunts fa►�r� ly. My' aunt cm %t the m meted.. ' .... with dove and treated to .excellent ti d"r l care. Witch A eve y one of their .tB is 'cared � at aU tiffs, Pe �Y .: y .ln:aithy clean, `well fed, and constantly adored by the entire family. If the issues being .w4ghad lace aw f . a a s d Ordinance WOW'S could Muse health irises of be: a ft ce far neighbors &o. I adst YM passe: tekt dim i `uaa. When .Sandt!.a was Brat informed that ..things to change .at her homa:, d.w o 1. g. M- of 6 d6whaft TU bwat was d.coned fin .top to bottoin widdn a nufty .of Sys and a dog trainer w hog a''d ISSOCCGESS a -4osauutW jo R4ts�Jan11 un' Wd92=01 '0 T.0.2- E0 -1400 .34 6VA fciiR C web Dwwons HeaAY • .. 8asdt 110! a , eaaan e.1AY0 t,caf, r ra:« Mail �atics ! ! Odd* ' a Seek pplabwt Nyls iot!M Yewb IaFwY IImO -_ R .. . - .. • show &tWA 2.^13 po t1 Wjs ti g" Wdm Fob b tre To VjwM it nay concom . M kmwa n ffiaRs (f� T My non is Dia fw Fold. and 1 hove k her hurA.W. Ed.'bacams: V*h ew wr gw ye' op. shpt Ilea bon caring W Mm "O-ugh ot�ItduiD trz�ol E Ever dr oe h 6 moral d dOCtDr'. Ctmt u u4 woMd not daooae. ertd reel blessed b ItOR Imwrr. Seetih T Th number Of pets awmk�& :. " .cis rlrx» * *t�outTltis 1lon that lrwiaes R d9i POO m 02"Mist at aN of 41e:#e Palij.atb-1a<dvr 1D.Polalds, 7 . '. sevia d — olwhwy cans i . 'L'kar.E 'tieP51J.7" , y�An o ",4a"cco�a,ax f . h ay : : "ruotrd a rlasrt t .. . ' •ur+s ced„a'x�s'' . : :.. , - - . . .. , tcsv:.. : .bed a ari,dee :: mead . K goda`let3lllt810v d - ' - - f fiat tibW:1 .i�i��Jor p!anpes. l tsA i�el 01" b 4o�d � 6f" J�IAd '1 ! or c�saTlieti. it ! a of iro�el fpr11!sli liaw o ' 1 know datum" b an abo* 4f i : 1 hope i r�aappe�d b 1h pQOd it>ahab of IhB so4t1c11!iio 1 tfiisur�quq . .eor►barsgaldso. x ppjdeai here. 1 tatiplore you Tri pta y duaaeR in .their atwes faF avitlt s maibnR; befois ate+ rlta)lae decmidn� ' S Sktoeraly. .. . ... • W9ss.6: Fo®Ar�d .. - : Pra#tdehi ' ::575 6liolirriaw Plat itos�d .. r - ' S Shorbvlesr. MN.tf51�. : - .. - CaSIj 777 7WO j tren �� Ik d ik !h 11l. EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, JULY 27, 2010 6:30 PM — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Members Absent Staff Arnie Blgbee John Cashmore Susan Howl Lisa Finsness Jess! Kingston Bob Mayer Dee Moore Meg Newell Russ Stanton Minutes Approved Member Moore seconded the motion of Member Stanton to approve the minutes of May 25, 2010; the motion carried. Member Finsness seconded the motion of Member Moore to approve the minutes of June 22, 2010; the motion carried. Proposed 2011 Budget Developed After discussing each provider's proposed amount, the Commissioners deliberated within the framework of the current budgeted amount for human services funding, which is $81,032. After proposed amounts were appropriated to each provider, the following motions were made, seconded and approved: • Members Stanton and Kingston — Add $,2000 to VEAP.. • Members Finsness and Moore — Discontinue - funding Normandale Center. Members Stanton and Finsness — Raise The Bridge to $5;000. • Members Finsness and Moore — Raise School Readiness to $9,000. Member Kingston seconded the motion of Member Mayer to recommend the following proposed 2011 human services budget to the City Council: Senior Community Services 24,000 Cornerstone 15,000 VEAP 22,000 The Bridge 5,000 Conflict Resolution Center 3,000 Store to Door 5,000 Tubman 1,000 Edina School Readiness 6.000 TOTAL 81,000 The motion carried. Team Business Shared • Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan — Chair Bigbee and Member Moore reported that they had the opportunity to meet with the,Chief of Police, Jeff Long. At the meeting, Chief Long indicated that he liked the Plan. The only concern raised pertained to the third item in the Plan's response and prevention process regarding privacy. The, goal is to have the Plan ready'to be included in an HRRC power_ point, presented to the community. It was suggested that Chief Long be .invited -to a future Commission meeting. • Visibility— Members Finsness, Kingston and.Newell have the goal of readying material for the power point presentation to community organizations. City of Maplewood's Request Reported Chair Bigbee- shared that the City of Maplewood's City Attorney, H. Alan Kantrud,'had contacted HRRC's staff liaison for information pertaining to the City's recent approval of the Domestic Partnership Ordinance.' The Ordinance and accompanying material were shared with him, and he promised to keep HRRC informed as to the unfolding of events in Maplewood., Meeting Adjourned There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00,13M. EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2010 7:00 PM — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Members Absent Staff Arnie Bigbee Lisa Finsness Susan Howl John Cashmore Meg Newell Jessi Kingston Bob Mayer Dee Moore Russ Stanton Approval of Minutes Postponed Due to the inability to confirm the statement about needing a Commission replacement on the Edina Community Council in the minutes of July 27th, the approval of these minutes was postponed until the next Commission meeting. Administrative Team's Work Plan Items Approved Member Mayer presented two items of the Work Plan which were rewritten with fuller description, clarity, and specific timeframes: • Nominations of Officers • Tom Oye Award Hereafter, the Administrative Team Chair will review the plan of the Administrative Team at the August meeting of the Commission in order to confirm any additional items to be added for review and dates for the Work Plan for the following year. Member Kingston seconded Member Mayer's Motion to approve the 2010 Administrative Team's items for the Work Plan; the motion carried. Editing of the Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan Approved Having been reviewed by the Police Chief, Chair Bigbee shared that the Plan had also been studied and edited by the City's Attorney, and it was now ready to be approved by the Commission. It will include an updated communications page with names and phone numbers of pertinent individuals who would be part of the process if it were to be implemented. The Visibility Team would now be able to include this in the power point slides when sharing the work of the Commission. Member Cashmore seconded Member Kingston's motion to approve the newly- edited 2010 Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan; the motion carried. Demographics Team Looking Ahead to the Census Member Stanton reported that there would be much useful data from the census to take into consideration when reviewing unmet needs in the community. Visibility Team Launching Plan Member Kingston shared that the Team will be meeting to discuss the Tom Oye article for the Sun, partnerships with the schools, including students on the Team, and getting Commission slides into a presentation format. Jennifer Bennerotte, the City's Communications Director, will be queried regarding the method /format for PowerPoint sharing within the community. Human Services Funding Process Discussed The Commissioners shared the following concerns and questions regarding the HRRC process for evaluating proposals and recommending funding for human services: • Clarification of the selection process, in which the proposed budget is created for approval by the City Council • Is there a better way to discern the needs of people in Edina? • Is this process of proposing a human services budget appropriate for the Commission on behalf of the City? • The Commission was reminded that the process establishes contracts with vendors, which means that the City is buying external services. • How is the United Way connected regarding the providers funding by the City? • Look at best practices in other suburban communities regarding the funding of human services. The Commission assigned staff to the task of gathering the following information from Bloomington, Richfield, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, St. Louis Park and Plymouth: • Are human services being funded in your city? • If so, how much money is spent to fund human services? • Is there a commission in place to review proposals and propose a human services budget? • If so, does this commission's mission have a reference to meeting basic human needs? Commissioners Stanton and Kingston agreed to take a look at this information when it is returned by the specific cities. Chair Bigbee reminded the Commission that the City Council would be hearing the HRRC 2011 proposal for human services funding on September 7th at its regular Council Meeting. It will be a five - minute presentation to the City Council, with an opportunity for questions. Commissioner's Relocation Announced Member Moore shared that she will be moving to Bloomington and therefore unable to continue serving on the Commission. Commissioners wished her well and thanked her for her commitment to the City of Edina. Domestic Partnership Benefits Revisited With item #4 deleted in the Domestic Partnership Ordinance, Members Kingston and Cashmore will meet with Phil Duran about the next steps to take concerning benefits. Commissioners Reminded of Upcoming Events • Sunday, September 19th — Edina Community Lutheran Church picnic - HRRC recognition for the Domestic Partnership Ordinance • Wednesday, September 22nd — Richfield Public Information Forum at the Woodlake Nature Center • Saturday, October 16th — "Peace power and Unity: Conference — Richfield Intermediate School • Friday, December 3`d — State conference in St. Paul Items Suggested for Future Meetings /Discussion • Bring in a speaker to discuss counteracting internet abuse. • Address ways to connect with the School District regarding the issue of bullying. • The Visibility Team's presentation could reference bullying and internet issues. • What will be the initiatives of the Commission going forward? Adiournment There being no further business of the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 PM. Edina Public Art Committee September 23, 2010 Honorable Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council: We are writing to formalize the request and comments we presented on behalf of the Edina Public Art Committee (EPAC) at the Council meeting on Tuesday, September 7, 2010. Our request is for $10,000 to support the costs of future exhibitions of sculpture on the Edina Promenade and at Grandview Square Park. These costs include a $500 fee to each of up to 12 artists selected for exhibition and $2,250 for 1,,2 nd and 3rd place °People's Choice" awards. These awards are selected by ranking votes of the viewing public. The EPAC was formed in 2004 as a standing committee of the Edina Art Center Board to support the acquisition and exhibition of art in public places in the City of Edina. Two early projects were the design competition, selection and installation of the Art Glass window and installation of the Art Dickey Photography exhibition, both in City Hall. The Pinecone installation at Centennial Lakes Park followed in 2008. The outdoor exhibition of sculpture began at Grandview Square in 2006. The opening of the Edina Promenade in 2009 presented an opportunity for installation of 9 additional sculptures along the walking and biking path. The City has installed pads and one pedestal for displaying this art. The City supported the Art Glass window installation and initial EPAC operations with a $25,000 appropriation in 2005. An additional $10,000 was provided in 2007 and 2008 for the inaugural Edina Promenade exhibition. The City continues to amortize an Art Glass balance (currently $14,830) with funds from utility bill donations. At the current rate of donations, this balance will be eliminated in about 4 years. At that time the utility bill donations will be available to support the operations of the EPAC. Since 2004 private donations totaling over $100,000, both directly and through the Edina Community Foundation, have supported the Art Glass installation, purchases of the Raven sculpture at City Hall, the Otter at Edinborough Park, the Pinecone at Centennial Lakes Park, and the Turtle and Time Piece sculptures on the Promenade. Private support also enabled the 2010 Promenade and Grandview Square sculpture exhibitions. We recognize the continuing importance of private support for EPAC programs. On November 4, the Edina Art Center will host an event called Taste of Creativity jointly sponsored by the Art Center, EPAC and the Fairview Auxiliary. The funds raised will be split among the sponsors. Lois Ring, EPAC's Chair, is on the committee planning this event. It is a first ever event - you are all invited, see ticket information on the Edina Art Center website - so we don't know how much to expect. We are hoping for a grand success. The Edina Community Foundation holds some small balances that will support future exhibitions, and will continue as our partner in raising funds for EPAC activities. Edina Public Art Committee Members of the committee are also giving EPAC's "Support Edina Public Art" buttons to donors of $5 or more, a venture that has raised $423 to date. The buttons have the image of the Centennial Lakes Pinecone sculpture and are primarily to raise awareness of the Committee and its work. The EPAC is made up of volunteers who are dedicated to maintaining and improving the quality of life in Edina through the enjoyment of art in the City's public areas. Linda Kieffer chaired the committee and Dick Crockett of the Edina Community Foundation advised on private support until this year. We appreciate your consideration of our request and will make ourselves available to answer questions as your budget review continues. The current Edina Public Art Committee Members are: Lois Ring - Chair Ilydesigns @msn.com 952 - 806 -9966 (Home) 612 - 987 -8899 (Cell) 7440 Edinborough Way #4117 Edina 55435 Bernice Amacher Bamacherl28@earthlink.net 952 - 933 -578 57BIake Rd Edina 55436 Brad Benn BWMBenn @comcast.net 952 - 922 -2289 (Home) 952 - 913 -1187 (Cell) 4424 Judson Lane Edina 55435 Rick Fesler rickfesier@comcast.net 952 -941 -4395 (Home) 952 - 941 -5306 (Office) 5201 Duggan Plaza Edina 55435 Naomi Griffith Naomigriff @visi.com 952 -941 -3738 (Home) 612 - 910 -2210 (Cell) 7009 Comanche Court Edina 55439 Amy Kerber Amy@,AmyKerber.com 952 - 210 -4414 (Cell) 7550 France Ave So. #100 Edina 55435 Bill McCabe wjmccabe @gwest.net 952 - 929 -7120 (Home) 612- 220 -7700 (Cell) 6124 Hansen Rd Edina 55436 Anne Spooner Aspooner @ci.edina.mn.us 952 - 903 -5789 (Office) 651 -645 -1937 (Home) 2035 Laurel Ave Saint Paul 55104 Ruth Valgemae rvalgemae @yahoo.com 952 - 920 -3975 (Home) 4315 Oakdale Ave S Edina 55424 Edina Art Center Board Meeting August 26, 2010 4:30pm at EAC Edina Art Center Mission Statement The Edina Art Center mission is to provide facilities, programs and services that meet and reflect the needs of our residents and neighbors for participation, education and enjoyment in the Arts with emphasis on fine arts. Members present: Hafed Bouassida, Steve Carlson, Rick Fesler, Bill McCabe, Heather Randall King, John Swon, Renee Usem, Ruth Valgemae and Jini Washburn Members absent: None Staff present: Diana Hedges and Phil Johnson CALL TO ORDER: Bill McCabe, Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 4:30 pm. APPROVAL OF JULY MINUTES The minutes for the July 22, 2010 meeting were read and approved. APPROVAL OF THE EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE POLICY Rick Fesler reported that EPAC had discussed but not approved the proposed EPAC policy. They will take it up again at their September 2nd meeting. Ruth Valgemae suggested that copies of the proposed policy document be provided to Board members even though it had not been approved by EPAC, Rick agreed that would be desirable. Copies will be provided. Diana Hedges asked if the language stating "When at all possible, the Chair of EPAC shall be a board member of the Edina Art Center and act as liaison to the Art Center" had been considered during discussions at the last meeting? Ruth replied that the committee had not discussed that particular phrase. Bill McCabe added that he liked the phrasing. Rick also reported long -time EPAC Chair, Linda Kieffer, had decided to retire. EPAC will choose the new Chair at the September meeting. A call for Linda's replacement on the committee will be issued. The new EPAC nominee will be submitted for approval by the Art Center Board. WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE— Steve Carlson Steve reported the committee had met on August 4th. Discussions focused on on -going fund raising for the Juried Show and for the Taste of Creativity event. An annual fundraising letter to be sent near the end of each year was also discussed. These three things would be the focus for the Ways and Means Committee throughout the Fall. Regarding the Juried Show, the committee encourages Board members to follow -up with their contacts encouraging donations. Following the board meeting, a review will be made to determine which of the solicitations have borne fruit and which should be followed up by phone. The Taste of Creativity will also require additional fundraising effort following the Juried Show. The Ways and Means Committee also encourages all Board members to provide a gift to the Art Center sometime during the year. Heather King asked if the gift referred to is over - and -above a donation to the Juried Show. . Steve replied that the gift would be an individual's choice during the year. EPAC Policy discussion continued Additional copies of the proposed EPAC Policy were available at this time. Examination and discussion of the document ensued. Rick Fesler asked if the document in front of them was the latest revision. Bill McCAbe replied that the document was dated June 10 but it incorporated changes made at the August meeting. Ruth Valgemae stated that Linda Kieffer had given her this version of the policy document and she (Ruth) had made additions based on her notes taken at the August meeting. Renee Usem asked for clarification of the term "creative findraising." Does that mean independent of the activities of the Ways and Means Committee? Bill McCabe stated that everyone has agreed that EPAC will work with Ways and Means. Heather King asked for confirmation that an EPAC member was a member of Ways and Means. Bill confirmed that Lois Ring was that member. Renee Usem suggested that "support fundraising" might replace "creative fundraising" Jini Washburn asked if the arrangement for fundraising is always to be the Art Center sharing funds with EPAC but not vice - versa. Steve Carlson replied that the Taste of Creativity is a unique event with funds raised to be shared 50% by the Fairview Hospital Auxiliary, Edina Art Center 25% and EPAC 25% after all expenses are paid. He also clarified that EPAC has solicited, and will continue to solicit, certain donation sources for public art and that is fine with the Ways and Means Committee since this is not a duplication of effort. Diana Hedges added that she hopes that with the adoption of the proposed policy and an improved working relationship, everyone in both organizations will begin thinking "We" rather than "They or Us ". It's really all part of the Edina Art Center. We all have the goal of bringing beauty into the City of Edina. Hafed Bouasidda asked why the policy document was needed at this time. Diana responded that the policy document was originated in 2004 and it is being reviewed and updated now in light of some questions and clarifications that have occurred over the past year. Hafed asked why EPAC is different than other committees such as the Juried Show committee. Ruth Valgemae replied that the Juried Show committee is formed each year to plan and implement the JS while EPAC is a standing committee focused on one City -wide mission. JS is an event while EPAC is on- going. Bill McCabe added that the updated policy document should be very useful to EPAC as well as the EAC Board. Diana Hedges reiterated that the policy document will be approved by EPAC, reviewed and approved by the Board and then submitted to the City Council for its approval. A discussion of several paragraphs and clauses began. It became clear that Board members were looking at different versions of marked -up documents. Consideration of the policy document was tabled until the September meeting, when the document is to be available in an approved version from EPAC. JURIED SHOW (JS)- Jini Washburn Jini reported the JS committee had just held a meeting. She invited Board members to attend the JS. and be available to help move things along at the opening. One thing that Board members could do is help quiet outside chatter during the opening ceremonies while judges are speaking. Having people in the tea room and kitchen hush their conversations will be important. Artist response has been low and followup contacts will be made to spur signups. Renee asked if artists can submit work that has been in previous shows. Diana replied that there is no rule 2 I prohibiting it, but in 24 years, she doesn't recall anyone doing so. Edi Fesler is contacting volunteers to work both on bring -in day and during the opening reception. Diana Hedges asked f both judges had provided bios. Jini replied that Marcia Andersen had supplied a bio and Patty Burretts would provide hers soon. Steve Carlson stated that he had gone to the Art Center web page to find information about the Juried Show. He had expected to find it front and center but had to really look for it. Diana Hedges said she would ask Anne Spooner to try to get the JS information displayed more prominently. Jini will prepare a sign -up sheet for Board members who plan to attend the JS opening. DIRECTORS REPORT —Diana Hedges Diana reported that plans for the Taste of Creativity are coming along beautifully, The Fairview Foundation has donated $500 and we have several other $300 sponsors as well. Diana passed out a draft form to be filled out by bidders in the Silent Auction as well as a list of auction items pledged to date. The committee is working on graphic images that will be the "branding" for the Taste of Creativity publicity and working materials. Also distributed were draft copies of postcards and business cards supporting the event. Tickets go on sale September 1 with sales limited to 200. Tickets should go fast. Prices are $40 for general admission, $60 for supporters and $75 for patrons. Plans are underway to do something special for patrons and others who donate larger amounts. We will have 14 artists demonstrating during the event similar to other carnivals and fundraisers in the past. There will be hors duveours served, wine tasting and music; it should be a very special fun event. The budget estimates show that the Art Center will make about $5,000, which is very good for a first -time event. Steve Carlson asked if setting a limit of 200 tickets was based on capacity. Diana replied that more could be accommodated, perhaps up to 250. This can be decided as ticket sales are monitored. Diana showed the new smaller version of EAC's class schedule. Postage savings around $4,000 plus a desire to "go green" were the motivating factors for this move. This experiment directs the reader to our website for class details. If our enrollments decline, it will be necessary to revert to the full 16 page schedule. Heather King asked about EAC participation at Fall Into the Arts Festival. Diana replied that we will have two tables where publicity materials can be handed out. Volunteers are still needed for this two -day event. Heather asked when the new student Board members start their participation. Diana replied that both Maria DePesa and Thea Zerbe are to attend the September meeting. Heather asked how Board members can learn about candidates for open City Council seats in terms of their support for the arts. John Swon replied that the League of Women Voters has scheduled a program for the candidates on August 28th. If one cannot attend, the meeting will be shown on community television Channel 16. EDINA FILM FESTIVAL — John Swon John reported on a meeting with the 50th and France Business Association. An earlier proposal for covering costs up to $10,000 was rescinded. The Association is not able to contribute a significant amount of money but they have agreed to spend money on advertising, including street banners, in the 50th Street area. John will make a presentation at the Association's 3 December meeting. He feels there is a lot of interest that can be tapped. Discussions continue with the Landmark Theatres' organization in an attempt to get pricing commitments for 2011. NEW BUSINESS Ruth Valgemae referred to coverage in the Edina Sun newspaper for the upcoming SumiE exhibit to open tonight in the EAC gallery. A very nice story. Bill McCabe announced that Megan Norman had offered her resignation from the EAC Board. Heather King asked how long it might take to find a replacement. Ruth Valgemae replied that it may depend on whether the City Council decided to seek new candidates or would go back to candidates interviewed in the past. The Board needs take no action at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:20 pm. 4 w9sNA , MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission ow e �� Thursday, August 19, 2010 v �y Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean White, Geof Workinger, Nathan Franzen STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called order by chair Janovy. II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of July 15. 2010 and the Work Session Minutes of July 1, 2010 Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the minutes of July 15 with the following corrections or changes by Commissioner Sprague: Page 2: Sprague moved that they create uniformAy and comprehensive approach for local streets with a and therefore. enact a Complete Streets policy. Motion seconded by Nelson. Page 3: Road Diet/Re- Striping Policy "Sprague said Bloomington has..." Road Reconstruction The motion was modified that the ETC receives annual updates of road reconstruction and the CIP, with a focus on the 2 -year plan but information on all proiects in the 5 -year plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sprague. All voted aye. III. New Business a. 7355 York Avenue (Southdale YMCA Expansion) Chuck Rickart of WSB & Associates, the City's consulting traffic engineer, explained the Southdale YMCA expansion project. Mr. Rickart said the project was originally submitted in September 2008 as replacement of the YMCA with similar square footage and a 130 -unit multi - family housing complex and approval was granted by the ETC with minor median reconstruction at York Avenue and the north parking lot entrance; however, the project was never constructed. The current proposal is to expand the existing facility approximately 21,900 sq.ft. with minimal parking lot and other site alterations. The expansion would be used for fitness and aquatics purposes and it could increase membership by 15 %. The multi - family component is no longer included. Rickart said the development team was asked to look intersections previously looked at including Parklawn & York, the two accesses in and out of the site and the oval median north of the site. The traffic study analysis shows that the expansion will add 1,162 additional trips per day with all intersections operating at an acceptable level of service D, except for an E or F on some movements, most of which are onsite in the parking lot. As part of the travel demand management, pedestrian travel will be improved with maintenance of the sidewalk along York Avenue, and creation of a new pedestrian walk from York Avenue to the front door. Additionally, approximately 15 -20 bicycle racks will be added. Based on the study analysis, Rickart said improvements are not recommended for the local street network. Staffs recommendation is "If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Commissioners' discussion included the following, followed by consultant's and staffs response: • Reason for stopping the study at year 2012 instead of 2020 — Rickart said it is best to look at the impact year (2012), instead of background traffic. • Report does not say if parking meets code — City engineer Houle said the Planning Commission (PC) reviews parking'ratio. • South entrance is under - utilized, could almost be eliminated, explore options to increase usage — Houle said this entrance is only right -in /right -out while the other is both left and right. He said changes on York to accommodate changes to the access would require the County's approval and they tend to lean towards eliminating accesses. • Commissioner Bonneville said he likes the project but finds it difficult to approve a level of service E /F. Rickart said this is the current level without any crashes to date. Mr. Mike Spack, Spack Consulting, said they are defining average delay per car and if one car is coming out and has to wait one minute, this level of service is defined as F. • The island at the south entrance (on site) seems close for traffic coming into the park lot. Rickart said most parking lots are designed for drivers to go left or right upon entry, not straight ahead. • Can the travel demand management plan be improved on the site? Commissioner Schroeder said the PC can take a closer look at this. Spack said office buildings tend to have more control over employees; with the YMCA the controls will be more difficult. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the YMCA offer incentives that would spread usage throughout the day. • What would trigger a future traffic signal at Parklawn? Rickart said about 10 -20% increase in traffic which could be 5 -10 years out. After discussion the overall concerns were summarized as: • Improving the travel management demand plan (since the YMCA is heavily used by children and seniors); • Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; • Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and • Fire truck and ambulance access; Commissioner Bonneville asked if emergency vehicles will be able to move around the building. Houle said site circulation is the PC's purview and they receive comments from the Fire Marshall and the Building Department official. He reminded the ETC that their purview is the roadway and local transportation while site circulation, access, and safety are handled by the PC. Chair Janovy said they are finding it difficult to separate what is happening on site with the roadway because they work together. Commissioner Bonneville said there are some things that happen at entrances that affect the roadway severely so they should have the right to review those things because of the site itself and the function of the site. Houle said the Traffic 2 Impact Analysis would need to be changed and the ETC would be more meshed with the PC to prevent duplication. Chair Janovy said in their last work session they made a motion to refer the TIA policy for update to staff and to have Assistant City Engineer Sullivan work with staff in the Planning Department, a couple ETC and PC commissioners to try and integrate the Transportation and Planning process better. Commissioner Bonneville motioned that the minutes shall act as the ETC's opinion as to the project's future and that the YMCA and Spack Consulting look into their concerns as stated in the minutes. Motion failed for lack of second. Commissioner Sprague motioned to accept the Traffic Impact Analysis that was presented and to include their three concerns that were raised as follows: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; and 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane. Commissioner Schroeder asked to amend the motion to read that it is their opinion that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems and request that their three concerns listed above be addressed. Commissioner Sprague accepted the amendment. After further discussion, the motion was restated by Commissioner Sprague that the expansion does not adverseiv affect the adjacent transportation systems: however, the following recommendations are made: 1) Improving the -travel management demand plan; 2) Improve pedestrian safety in the parking lot; 3) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and 4) Improving the level of service at the northbound exit. Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. All voted aye. Motion carried. b. Edina Police Presentation Sergeant Tom Draper, a night supervisor with the Edina Police Department, explained the operations of the Traffic Unit. He said the unit with three officers, covers traffic enforcement from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He said staffing is comparable to other cities of similar size. Sgt. Draper said they are required to spend a certain amount of time at locations that are called in by residents. There is a speed trailer that is moved around to different locations. He said residents begin calling around March /April to get on the list. Regarding stop signs, he said the requests are referred to the Engineering Department. He said enforcement is increased in problem areas for stop sign violations, as well as no turn on red. Regarding bicycles, he said is not aware that citations have been issued instead they are warning riders that they are required to follow the same laws as motor vehicles. He was asked about joggers in the road when there is a sidewalk — he said he is not aware of citations being issued. He said they do target speeders in neighborhoods and have found that most violators do live in the neighborhood, on 70th Street, for example, most of the violators are residents. He said officers do have discretion when to write a citation; however, most drivers have come to expect a 5 mph leeway. A moving violation citation is $150 and this is set by Hennepin County. He said public education would be helpful since most of the violators are in the neighborhoods. Commissioner Janovy said the primary focus has been engineering solutions to traffic issues. She said other communities are using different approaches such as training residents to use 3 radar gun and writing down license plate number and sending a polite letter from the police department. Sgt. Draper said this has been discussed which is why the radar is out there. Houle talked a project called Project Lead Foot which he said is very much like the City's program but just not captured in the same way. He said traffic safety coordinator, Boyd, does go out and use a radar gun with residents and they are usually surprised to discover that the speed is not as fast as they thought it was. Commissioner Sprague said Chanhassen has found that raising awareness is the most useful through a traffic worksheet that they distribute to residents. Houle said many neighborhoods have their own listserve and this would be an inexpensive way to communicate. Traffic Safety Reports of June 2 and July 7 Chair Janovy said they agreed that the Traffic Safety Report would be put on their consent agenda. July 7 report — Section D — regarding the calls received from residents regarding France Avenue Restriping. Houle said most calls are due to the restriping which causes drivers to slow down. Houle explained that Section D of the report is new and is to show the types of calls that are received and that the issues are generally resolved without having to go to the Traffic Safety Committee. IV. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) No update. V. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) No update. VI. Staff Liaison Comments a., 70th Street Reconstruction Update Houle approvals were received from Mn /DOT, bids are set to be opened on September 9 and construction spring 2011. Regarding landscaping in the boulevard, Houle said they will coordinate with residents to move and transplant plantings within a specific timeframe at the residents' expense. He said irrigation /dog fence is included in the construction costs. Houle shared materials from a personal rapid transit workshop that he attended. He said the presenter is willing to attend a meeting to explain how it works. VII. Commission Comments No comments. VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. 4 Bloomington Public Health Quarterly Report ■ For the City of Edina April — June 2010 April — June 2010 D WuaiiMYJActivities � in Edina ■ The work of Public Health is defined by six areas of responsibility. This report utilizes the areas of public health responsibility to organize details of activities conducted in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Activities in the following areas are described in this report: • Assure an adequate public health infrastructure • Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors • Assure the quality and accessibility to health services • Prepare for and respond to disasters and assist communities in recovery • Prevent the spread of infectious diseases A special section highlighting the activities of SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Program) has been added under "Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors." ■ PROMOTE HEALTHY COMM"ITIES AND HEALTHY BEHAVIORS Promoted safe prom, graduation and summer celebrations with the 2010 Together We Stand Campaign. The campaign message "Celebrate without Alcohol" promoted having alcohol -free parties as families celebrate and honor their graduating teen. This message was widely displayed via posters and flyers. In addition, over 1,000 families with graduating seniors in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield, received the message via school mailing. The Tri -City Partners Coalition, organized by Bloomington Public Health, partnered with schools, businesses, faith communities, and other community organizations to run the campaign. Sent surveys to hotels and motels for the purpose of analyzing policy trends and gaps in addressing underage drinking. The surveys will also provide an indication of the severity of the problem of underage drinking in these establishments. Survey results will be used to promote discussions within the hotel industry on ways to become united in dealing with underage drinking. This was an activity of the Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking Action (STOP) grant. Evaluated the Tri -City Partners Coalition and Steering Committee. This coalition is organized by Bloomington Public Health. It works to promote health, reduce substance use and other risk behaviors, and build assets in youth in the communities of BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Coalition members completed an online survey for the evaluation. The survey collected information about members' satisfaction regarding processes, procedures, assessment, implementation, planning and outcomes. Provided an educational seminar: about child growth and .development resources for 80 child care providers. The seminar, "Strategies to Help Children Grow.and Shine," included information about resources for children and families when thereAre concerns about growth'and development. Speakers focused on behavioral concerns and speech and language development. Addressed the following topics.at monthly Senior Clinics: April Core strength: Firming -up central muscles to improve posture, flexibility and bowel function and to reduce back problems and- incontinence May Over - the - counter medications: Appropriate, use and,cautions June Adding vegetables to meals: Using the "great plate" method and farmers markets Informed seniors about Public Health services provided at the Edina Senior Center for a new members welcome event. The discussion included the history of Bloomington Public Health's connection with Edina. Seniors were interested in services that Bloomington Public Health provides for all ages. • Spoke about Public Health services to the parish nurse and lay ministry staff at the Church of St. Patrick. Followed the discussion with examples of interventions provided for individuals in the community. Participants had many questions and expressed they were glad to know about the services. " • Co- sponsored a parent forum with Tri- City Partners Coalition to support Edina youth to stay alcohol - and drug -free. One hundred parents attended the forum titled We Can Do This Together! Raising Youth, in a Drinking Culture. The forum first. presented information about substance .use trends and community norms. Parents then defined their roles in reducing. and preventing underage drinking. SHIP (STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) ■ Trained 55 childcare and preschool staff members to provide regular physical activity for children in their programs. The attendees represented 30 programs in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Combined, they have the potential to affect 1600 children under the age of five. The 1 Am Moving I Ain Learning training taught childcare and preschool staff how to incorporate physical activity into existing curriculum. Early and regular physical activity is important to brain development and school readiness. It also establishes a pattern of activity. that promotes life -long health. Bloomington Public Health will continue to provide assistance to the programs for implementing the physical activity policies they create after attending the training. ■ Promoted the use of ICSI (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) chronic disease prevention guidelines in area healthcare settings. The guidelines promote evidence -based clinical management of lifestyle factors responsible for the development SPH Quarterly Activities in Edina of chronic diseases. Made contacts with decision makers regarding implementation and use of the guidelines. Three clinics and two public health programs decided to participate: Bloomington Lake Clinics (Bloomington), Northwestern Natural Care Center (Bloomington), Southdale Internal Medicine (Edina) and Bloomington Public Health's WIC (Women, Infants and Children) and Sage Plus programs (serving Bloomington, Edina and Richfield). • Conducted walking assessments and created customized walking maps to increase physical activity of employees at 13worksites in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. These activities are part of the Energize at Work initiative. This initiative makes it easier for employees to stay fit by walking — increased energy is a bonus. The customized walking maps include 1 -3 walking routes that can be completed in a 15- minute break or a 30- minute lunch break. It also includes recommended physical activity guidelines for adults and space to record walking mileage. • Worked with city and school representatives in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield to determine bike rack needs. With bike racks in more places it will be easier for residents to ride bicycles to more places and get more physical activity. Bike rack orders were finalized in Bloomington and Edina. In Richfield, the Richfield High School National Honor Society collected bike rack data from all school locations. They combined their information with the newly formed Bicycle Master Plan Task Force to determine bike rack priority locations. • Participated in an active living workshop planning group with representatives from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Active living is a way of life that integrates physical activity into daily routines through activities such as biking, walking and /or transit. The workshop will inform residents how they can benefit from this lifestyle that provides opportunities to improve health and reduce chronic disease risks. • Reviewed 36 mini -grant proposals, and selected 13 to receive mini -grant awards totaling $46,000. Proposals were received from community organizations, schools, worksites and health care providers. The selection of recipients was made based on proposals that most closely supported current SHIP interventions: increasing physical activity in schools, improving nutrition in schools and preschools, increasing physical activity in worksites and improving opportunities for physical activity in communities. • Conducted the Alliance for a Healthier Generation Healthy School Builder Assessment Tool at Normandale Elementary and South View Middle schools. The Alliance for a Healthier Generation works to positively affect the places that can make a difference to a child's health. The action plans created from the assessments will provide students more opportunities to be physically active at school. The assessment tool was completed at each school with their wellness councils. • Planned marketing strategies to promote use of the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. Created and distributed flyers, and created a banner. Placed an ad in the Sun Current newspaper. Sent invitations and a note of thanks to all Edina state legislators, city council members and the city manager. City of Edina staff conducted additional marketing. BP. H Quarterly Activities in Edina 0 ASSURE THE QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO HEALTH SERVICES ® Revised SHIELD outreach and promotional materials to indicate the new name "Help Me Grow, South Hennepin. The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) created the new name, "Help Me Grow," for the statewide early intervention system. They provided a new logo, brochure and business card templates.for outreach and promotional materials. Local contact information was added,to the templates. The phone number has not changed, buta new email address is now available: helpmegrow @ci.bloomingto'n.mn.us. Followed -up on 10 new senior and vulnerable adult referrals. Referrals were for chronic disease management (3), mental illness (2), dementia (2), dysfunctional relationships (2) and a garbage house (1). Public Health Nurses (PHNs) conducted in- home assessments and arranged resources to help clients live safely and independently in their homes. In one case, a family of three generations in one home needed help to deal with a complex situation of Alzheimer's, substance abuse and violence. A son moved into his parents' home to care for his father with beginning Alzheimer's. A grandson who lost his job also moved into the house. The grandson had substance abuse and violence issues that were difficult for his grandfather with beginning Alzheimer's to deal with. A PHN met with the son to offer support and community resources to help relieve this complex situation. 0 PREPARE FOR AND RESPOND TO IDISASTERS AND ASSIST COMMUNITIES IN RECOVERY Guest lectured on emergency preparedness and H1N1 at a University of St. Thomas Epidemiology class. o Trained 38 (1 from Edina) faith -based organizations on the Ready Set Go! Faith Community Emergency Preparedness. Toolkit. 4 D D _LT uaine R1 Numbers Report for Edina ■ 2010 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES These numbers are a count ofpeople served each quarter. Some people receive the same service and are counted in more than one quarter. ■ FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES Maternal and Child Health PHN home - visiting # offamilies Q1 Q2 • HEALTH PROMOTION 50 42 Community health presentations # o f a d u l t s 1 1 7 1 1 5 School educational presentations # of students 495 0 SHIP presentations # ofattendees 25 31 • ADULT AND SENIOR SERVICES 16 5 Senior health receives referrals from police, senior 1 1 outreach, social services, environmental health and other 29 30 community agencies for vulnerable adults and falls. 3/9 3/9 Individual clients served #ofclients 12 14 Public Health Nurse visits # of individual nursing visits 10 10 Service coordination # of calls and case conferences 25 18 Senior hearing screening # of participants 16 6 Senior Community Public Health Nurse Clinics # of clients 75 103 # of consultations 118 124 Health education presentations # of participants 0 27 ■ FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES Maternal and Child Health PHN home - visiting # offamilies 28 22 # of clients 50 42 # of visits 126 106 Car seats # referrals 0 0 SHIELD # of children 15 18 Police reports reviewed for follow -up # offamilies 16 5 South Vista # of pregnant and/or parenting adolescents 1 1 Follow Along clients # of children enrolled 29 30 Child -care consultations # ofcenters /# of visits made 3/9 3/9 High -risk birth certificate referrals follow -up # of babies 32 47 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 QI Q2 ■ CLINIC SERN7ICES Women, Infants and Children (WIC) # ofclients(unduplicated) 204 218 Health Risk Assessment Clinic # of clients 6 4 Sage Screening Program # of clients 6 7 SagePlus Cardiovascular Screening # of clients 2 3 Immunization Clinic # of adult clients 1 3 # of immunizations 1 3 Immunization Clinic # ofchildren 1 2 # of immunizations 2 9 Flu shots - seasonal # of clients 13 0 Flu shots - H1N1 # of immunizations 233 0 Head Start early childhood screenings # of children screened NA 0 Intake calls & drop -in visits # of contacts 25 29 Perinatal Hepatitis B # ofclients 1 0 Reportable disease follow -up / consultations # of contacts 12 10 Q3 Q4