Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-10-19_COUNCIL MEETINGCo- Research, Planning & Development Department July 2010 The State of Metropolitan America: How is the Twin Cities Metro Area and Hennepin County Doing? It's been over 150 years since the Territorial Legislature of Minnesota established Hennepin County. Since then the County has become the center of the sixteenth largest metropolitan area in the nation. In the interval, the County, like the rest of the country, has gone through several major changes rendering the area unrecognizable were its early inhabitants to see it now. New demographic data from the Brookings Institution's "State of Metropolitan America" report show America is undergoing another transformation, one for which we may not be prepared. Our country's 100 largest metropolitan areas, the collections of cities and suburbs that house two - thirds of our population, are on the front lines of this transformation. The nation has grown larger, more diverse and more educated in the first decade of this century. Those three characteristics offer the potential of an advantage among industrialized nations as the global economy becomes more integrated and more competitive. There are also challenges facing the nation and the County. The Twin Cities metro area (comprising the seven metro counties, and Isanti, plus Pierce and St. Croix counties in Wisconsin) exhibits these three characteristics, while containing distinguishing elements. Its population growth was a robust 8.3 percent, above the nation's 7.8 percent increase. This growth resulted from an increase of 50,000 people of color (including Latinos) more than offsetting a loss of about 25,000 white non - Latinos. The core cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul are quite diverse (37.4 percent are people of color or Latino, against the nation's 34.6 percent.) A diverse population accounts for 36 percent of Minneapolis's population. Yet Hennepin County, while more diverse than the remainder of the metro area, remains less diverse than the nation. The Twin Cities area's adults are well- educated, with 37.6 percent holding a four -year college degree, up 4.3 percent from 2000. This higher rate of educational attainment (ninth- ranked among the nation's 100 largest metro areas) distinguishes the Twin Cities metro area. The Brookings Institution even terms the Twin Cities area a "talent magnet" according to its report, with the region attracting a highly educated workforce. Hennepin County leads the way, with 43.9 percent of its population having at least a bachelor's degree. The report also includes the Twin Cities in their "New Heartland" group of metro areas, joining 18 other American regions including; Atlanta, Raleigh -Cary, Kansas City, Richmond and Portland. New Heartland metropolitan areas, as indicated by their title, represent in some ways the "middle of the road" on the new demographic realities facing America. Their population characteristics —more educated, somewhat less diverse and younger (Hennepin County is somewhat older) reflect in large part the selective in- migration they experienced. Once a recovery is underway, the diverse economic specializations of these places, Hennepin County included, will position them to participate in the next wave of economic growth. Yet summary numbers conceal several reasons for concern. There are large income disparities among the area's races and ethnicities, with the Brookings report singling out the region for annual income differences between Black and all households that exceed $30,000. In fact, the difference is over $40,000 for Black households and nearly $28,000 for Latino households. It was also cited as having the fourth greatest change in wage inequality between 1999 and 2008D1 D, although its 2008 inequality measure is still 38 percent below that of Bridgeport - Stamford's - the highest ranked metro area for 2008 wage inequality. The County's advantage in educational attainment may not last long. In 2008 the proportion of its adult population with at least a Bachelor's degree (43.9 percent versus the nation's 27.7 percent) contributed to its higher 2008 household income (a median of $62,247 versus the nation's $52,029), but the nation is catching up. Nearly 41 percent (40.9 %) of the nation's 18 -to -24 year olds were enrolled in higher education versus the County's 44.4 percent. And high school graduation rate disparities among the County's races and Latinos further threaten the County's educational advantage. If the County's 2008 public school first graders graduate at the rates actually experienced by each race and by Latinos in 2008, only S8 percent of these first graders will graduate in 2019, down from the 2008 graduation rate of 64 percent. The decline is due to a larger share of the first grade class of 2008 being children of color or Latinos, who have lower graduation rates than whites. This comes at a time when the economy is increasingly rewarding higher education. Across the 100 largest metro areas, the college to high school wage ratio grew from 1.73 to 1.85 between 1999 and 2008, albeit the result of college - educated workers' flat wages and the falling wages of workers with a high school diploma only. During this time interval, the median inflation — adjusted household income in Hennepin County fell by 5.9 percent. Food, shelter and health care will take more pay from even more households, leaving them with difficult choices on where to spend the remainder, if any. Increased requests for government help in a variety of forms can be expected. This is bad timing for a nation that may approach a "poverty trap ", whereby a large segment of its population commands so many public resources (read: "Baby Boomers ") that it cannot afford to invest in initiatives to increase its economic growth. ' The 2000 census asked for households' incomes in 1999. Geographically, poverty remains concentrated in the central cities — Minneapolis' poverty rate (20.4 percent in 2008) is over three times that of Hennepin's suburbs, but the share of the County's poor residing in the suburbs has risen from 31 percent in 1999 to 39 percent in 2008. This shift will require more dispersed service delivery, to which HSPHD is responding with its regionalization plan. The County's strength at integrating immigrants into its social fabric will be tested by the large volume of immigration (foreign -born Hennepin residents increased by nearly 23,000 between 2000 and 2008, while Ramsey saw an increase of 5,000) and by the socioeconomic challenges many of the immigrants and their children will face. The economic and social future of the Twin Cities will hinge in part on the ability of its institutions to move a more diverse population toward post- secondary educational success and ready them for work in high value -added occupations. ,"7 Brookings- Institution State of Metropolitan America r` Minneapolis -St. Paul, Metro Area, Hennepin County and United States Key Indicators Counties: Minnesota: Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott Wisconsin: Pierce, St. Croix Primary Cities: Minneapolis, MN; St. Paul, MN Population: 3,229,878 (2009) The Minneapolis -St. Paul- Bloomington, MN- W[metro area is the 16" largest in the United States and the largest in Minnesota Metro Metro rank Primary cities Suburbs Hennepin Co. United States Population and migration % change in population, 2000 -2008 8.3 54 -1.1 11.0 2.3 7.8 Domestic migration rate (as % of 2000 population), 2000 -20081 -0.9 63 N/A 0.0 % of population moving in previous year 14.1 77 22.4 12.2 17.0 15.6 Immigration % of population that is foreign -born 8.7 47 14.1 7.4 11.7 12.5 % change in foreign -born population, 2000 -2008 33.8 57 -8.4 69.6 22.7 22.0 % of children with at least one foreign -born parent 17.0 45 32.0 13.8 22.8 22.0 Age . % of population age 45 and over 37.1 60 33.0 38.1 38.9 38.5 % change in under -18 population, 2000 -2008 2.3 61 -12.8 6.2 0.04 2.5 Dependency ratiO3 54.4 84 46.5 56.5 52.5 58.9 Educational attainment % of population age 25 and over with bachelor's degree or higher 37.6 9 41.5 36.6 43.9 27.7 Change in % of population with bachelor's degree, 2000 -2008 4.3 24 6.3 3.9 5.7 3.3 % 18 -to -24 year -olds enrolled in higher education 42.1 42 51.0 38.8 44.4 40.9 z.... . . _._.., . .. _. .t - - - .. Work Annual income for middle -wage workers' 48,039 12 50,100 40,911 % change in wage for middle -wage workers, 2000 -2008 -0.03 54 3.0 -1.4 Income and poverty Median household income ($) 66,517 12 47,473 71,471 62,247 52,029 % change in median household income, 2000 -2008 -5.9 67 -4.7 -7.4 -5.9 -4.1 % children in poverty 10.2 94 27.6 6.5 13.3 18.2 Commuting % of commuters who drive alone 78.3 61 65.6 81.2 74.3 75.5 % of commuters who use public transit 4.8 16 12.7 3.0 7.3 5.0 % change in commuters who use public transit, 2000 -2008 18.8 58 -0.5 46.4 4.2 22.9 Out of 100 largest metropolitan areas Net domestic migration from 2000 to 2008 divided by population in 2000 ' Includes all groups other than non - Hispanic whites ' Population under 18 plus population 65 and over divided by population age 18 to 64, multiplied by 100 4 Full -time, year -round workers at the median Source: Brookings Institution analysis of Census 2000, U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates program, and 2008 American Community Survey data. Hennepin County data compiled by Research, Planning & Development Department 1 AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL ,nnepin County Commissioner Jan Callison Presentation 2010 Polaris Leadership Award Youth Exchange Resolution No. 2010 -90 Proclamation Health + Art Month * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010 and Work Session of October 5, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARINGS (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) 1. Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AQ -10 — Resolution No. 2010 -98 Agenda/Edina City Council October 19, 2010 Page 2 2. Weed Cutting — Imp. No. WD -10 — Resolution No. 2010 -99 3. Tree Removal — Imp. No. TR -10 — Resolution No. 2010 -100 4 Grandview Business District -Improvement No. G-10— Resolution No. 2010 -101 5. 50th & France - Improvement No. M -10 — Resolution No. 2010 -102 B. PUBLIC HEARING - CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES - Resolution No. 2010 -103 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy, 6905 York Avenue — Resolution No. 2010 -104 (Favorable rollcall majority vote of Council Members present to approve) D. PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING, YMCA, 7355 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2010 -105 And Rezoning Ordinance No. 850 -A -35 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members present to approve) III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Truck Mounted Aerial Device — Park Maintenance Department * B. Reject All Bids - Exterior Improvements — Braemar Arena * C. Two Portable EMS Ultrasound Systems— Edina Fire Department IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Sale of Bonds, $9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bond, Series 2010A — Resolution No. 2010 -106 B Sale of Bond, $2,595,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2010B — Resolution No. 2010 -107 C. Resolution No. 2010 -108 Accepting Various Donations (Affirmative vote of four Council Members to approve) * D. Traffic Safety Report of October 6, 2010 * E. Resolution No. 2010 -109 Set Improvement Public Hearing Date (November 16, 2010) For Ridge Road Improvement No. BA -384 * F. Resolution No. 2010 -110 Accepting Right -of -Way Acquisition Offer From MnDOT For TH169/1 -494 Interchange Project * G. Resolution No. 2010 -111 Approving Permit To Construct Within City Right -of -Way For TH169/1 -494 Interchange Project V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for Agenda /Edina City Council October 19, 2010 Page 3 future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, Pre -List dated October 7, 2010, TOTAL $1,049,944.81; Pre -List dated October 14, 2010, TOTAL $863,912.25 and Credit Card Transaction From August 26, 2010 to September 27, 2010, TOTAL $10,087.46 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Oct 19 Work Session — Kathy Schmidlkofer — REDA Proposal 5:30 P.M. Tues Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Nov 1 Work Session — Final Levy Review & 2011 Gen Fund Budget 5:00 P.M. Mon Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 2 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Mon Nov 8 CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS 5:00 P.M. Thur Nov 11 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Nov 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 23 Study Session —to be determined 7:30 A.M. Thur Nov 25 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Dec 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 5, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Bennett, Brindle Swenson and Chair Hovland. Commissioner Housh was absent. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2010, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for September 21, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ceil Smith, Executive Director �ZNA, �l O� Ei v � � T9 • f��ie°e e PRE S ENTATI0N HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONED, JAN CALLISON N No packet data N Oral presentation [-] Information coming To: The Clerk of the City of Edina From: Susan and Kevin Green 4903 Sunnyside Road 18- 028 -24 -22 -0074 We are writing to appeal our assessment for the treatment of aquatic weeds to the Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond. Although our lot fronts the creek, the aquatic weeds have not been treated behind our home for several years due to the accumulation of lily pads in the water. Three years ago we flagged down the operator of the weed mowing machine and asked him to come into the area behind our house — he is the one that told us he is not allowed to come near any area that has lily pads present. We asked that he make sure the city is aware of the problem. That is the last time the weed mowing machine has come anywhere near the upper portion of the pond and the lily pads have now completely choked that portion of the creek. Therefore we are objecting to the city assessing us for a service that is not provided — and has not provided for several years. a /b - /9-/L? ,Lfi-� October 19, 2010 Edina City Council City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed Assessment 30- 028 -24 -12 -0060 Dear Presiding Officer and Council Members, This letter of objection concerns the City Council's proposed assessment against my property-6309 Brookview Avenue South — relating to the removal of a tree from my neighbor's yard. My family's objection to this assessment in the proposed amount of $697.97 includes, but is not limited to, the following concerns: 1) THE TREE WAS NOT OUR PROPERTY: A fence divides our property from the owners of the tree, which was situated on 6313 Brookview Avenue South. It is our understanding that Mr. Dean Swanson confirmed with the City Forester Tom Horvath that the fenceline sits six inches inside the property line on our neighbor's side. Consequently, the tree either did not occupy land on our side of the property, or, in the alternative, to the extent that any portion of the tree did come into contact with the property line, the amount represented a de minimus intrusion not warranting the proposed action by the City of taking our,family's limited resources to satisfy a neighbor's clear and unambiguogs obligation for the tree's removal. R To put the matter into perspective, the Swanson homestead exercised complete dominion over the tree, to the extent that should we have removed the tree prior to the city's identifying a Dutch Elm problem, the Swanson would have the right to sue for damages resulting from trespass and ` conversion, amongst other torts. '�; 1. w•ct 2) NEIGHBOR FAILED DUE We have come to learn that two Dutch Elm- infected trees were removed from the area immediately adjacent to the tree now in dispute within 18 months of our purchase of the 6309 Brookview Avenue South property in November, 2008. Consequently, the tree's owners were on notice to take steps to protect their tree, and failing to do so, now ask the city to reflexively apply a policy to help alleviate the financial obligations created by their property management. 3) FAILURE TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF COSTS: The City's Notice, dated on September 20, 2010 did not include a receipt for services or other document independently confirming the City's expense on tree removal, raising questions of due process. 4) FAILURE TO APPORTION COSTS: The City's assessment fails to take into account the percentage, if any, that the tree actually encroached onto and over the property line. To the extent that the tree did encroach over the property line, such percentage of the tree's area would represent a fair assessment value, while avoiding concerns relating to Takings Clause. 5) UNCOMPENSATED COSTS IMPOSED BY SAID NEIGHBORS: Following the tree's removal in early February, a large opening remained in the fence for a period of two weeks until the tree's owners put up plastic fencing, also known as "cyclone fencing ", with varying degrees of incomplete coverage and without appropriate support structure. Neither the repeated trespasses of the neighbor's dog onto our property, nor the presence of our two children under the age of three, were deemed sufficient reasons to for the Swanson's to repair their fence. This condition lasted through June 17, 2010, when we were given permission to repair the Swanson's fence, at a cost of nearly $750.00 and with no contribution, either material or labor, from the property owners. For these reasons, we submit that the assessment be directed in full to 6313 Brookview Avenue South, on whose property the tree did rest. Very Truly Yours, e;�X?-4�40 C. -- Travis C. Thompson Owner 6309 Brookview Avenue South cc: file ��N_ �/s 016�J� CONS To deve op and support the GIS professional in Minnesota for the benefit of our state and its citizens. Activities • Annual conference in October • Workshops and other professional development events • Quarterly online newsletter: GIS /LIS News • Bi- weekly e -mails about upcoming events and breaking news Members include r professionals from local, state, and federal government agencies; business and industry; educational institutions; and nonprofits. Anyone can become a member by signing up at our t Web site: www.mngislis.org Participate! Consortium members are invited to share their work and ideas at the annual conference or in the quar- terly newsletter. They can also volunteer to serve on committees and to help plan conferences and workshops. Such work makes a significant contribu- tion and provides an opportunity to meet like- minded professionals. The Consortium is made possible by volunteers and everyone's participation is welcome. 2010 Polaris Leadership Award I -•- ---- ---- ------ --- - --- -7 i MnGeo's Mission MnGeo coordinates the development, implementation, support and use of geospatial technology. We are advised by advisory councils, committees and worhgroups representing stakeholders within state government and around the state. MnGeo offers technical support in the form of guidance, training, and consulting to agencies needing extra help to improve their services by implementing GIS. MnGeo's experienced staff is available to help agencies meet special project needs without the need to hire permanent staff. M nGeo offers technical services to state agencies and the statewide GIS community and promotes an enterprise -wide approach to delivery of GIS technical service by our partners. Check out the Minnesota Geospatial Data Clearinghouse as a comprehensive data resource, the Minnesota j GeoGateway to help find data from other organizations, and "First Stop" pages to learn about specific data resources. i HISTORY The Minnesota Geospatial Information Office, known as MnGeo, was established in May 2009 as the first state agency with legislatively defined responsibility for coordinating GIS within Minnesota. It was created based upon a recommendation made by the Dive to Excellence Sub - Cabinet to pursue an enterprise strategy to implementing GIS within the state. Drive to Excellence is a high -level state - government reform program that recommends government reforms that improve services. MnGeo succeeds the Land Management Information Center. Created in 1977 as the first state agency anywhere exclusively devoted to providing GIS services within state government, LMIC's role evolved from a project - oriented program to Minnesota's "ad hoc" GIS coordinating organization. With the passage of legislation to create MnGeo, LMIC ceased to exist. However, all of LMIC's functions essential to MnGeo's coordination responsibilities, along with LMIC's resources, were transferred to the new office. The process of developing recommendations leading to the creation of MnGeo involved a large cross - section of stakeholders and was guided by an Enterprise GIS steering committee and workgroups that included members of the Strategic Planning Committee of the Minnesota Governors Council on Geographic Information. Many of these contributors now serve on the State Government Geospatial Advisory Council established in October 2oo9. STATE GOVERNMENT GEOSPATIAL ADVISORY COUNCIL This newly created council, authorized by legislation, advises MnGeo about issues, policies, priorities, and investments needed to improve state government services through the coordinated, affordable, reliable, and effective use of geospatial technology. STATEWIDE GEOSPATIAL ADVISORY COUNCIL This newly created council, also authorized by legislation, advises MnGeo about issues, policies, priorities, and investments needed to improve services statewide. The council represents a cross - section of organizations that include counties, cities, universities, business, nonprofit organizations, federal and state agencies, and other stakeholder groups that benefit from geospatial technology. MNGEO COMMITTEES AND WORKGROUPS Voluntary working groups are formed to address specific issues — on -going or short term — that are identified by the Advisory Council as important to the advancement of geospatial technologies in Minnesota. PROJECT PORTFOLIO With staff that has helped State agencies benefit from GIS technology for more than thirty years, MnGeo has successfully completed more projects than can be featured here. But take a look at some of our work that demonstrates what we can do for you: Mapping telephone exchange areas: A view of all the state's telephone exchanges has been valued by telecommunication businesses since we first created it in 1996. i� Child care food aid eligibility- New rules for a federal aid program gave the Department of Education less than three months to determine which Minnesota child care homes were located in areas of high need, qualifying them for reimbursement for the food they serve. Oak wilt: We created large maps of more than loo cities and townships to help communities monitor and fight this fast - spreading disease. Statewide Parcel Map Inventory: Created for the Minnesota Department of Transportation, this project surveyed all local government units in Minnesota and created a mapping interface to track their digital parcel capabilities. Contact MnGeo to learn how we can help you meet your goals! MnGeo 300 Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street Saint Paul MN 55155 w%"w.mngeo.state.mn.us mn.geo @state.mn.us 651 -201 -2499 Mac 0 0 Minnesota Geospatial Information Office MnGeo Geographic & Demographic Analysis Minnesota Department ojAdministration y 144P> �GN o Improving services statewide through the coordinated, af- fordable, reliable and effective use of GIS. .vww.mngeo.state.mn.us .. . a 0 Cn v � �y \�oORPOR!`"5�9� 1888 2010 POLARIS LEADERSHIP AWARD No packet data Oral presentation ❑ Information coming RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -90 WELCOMING YOUTH EXCHANGE STUDENTS City­ of Edina WHEREAS, youth exchange programs promote understanding and tolerance between and WHEREAS, Edina High School welcomes foreign exchange students from around the world to spend one academic year learning in its classrooms; and WHEREAS, various youth exchange organizations promote international study and support these students through mandated and voluntary programs that enrich the students' cultural experience; and WHEREAS, Edina families open their homes and welcome these students to live as part of their family for one year; and WHEREAS, these foreign exchange students embark upon a unique and exciting journey, arriving with just a suitcase and a passport. These amazing young people bravely carry their heritage and values across the world with the hope of living, learning and sharing with an American host family. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council formally recognize these exchange students, host families, Edina school administrators and your exchange organizations for their dedication to peace and understanding through international cultural sharing, to encourage the sharing of ideas, values and experience among today's youth by exposing young scholars to leadership, civil society principles and community service. Dated: October 19, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 y FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Ow e &\ 0 rase PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Taste of Creativity on November 4, 2010 will showcase the collaboration of the Edina Art Center and the Fairview Auxiliary to celebrate and raise funds for the advancement of joint efforts in the arts and healthcare; and WHEREAS, through classes, workshops and outreach programs, the Edina Art Center is increasing the quality of life for our community; and WHEREAS, as a member of the Midwest Arts in Healthcare Network, the Edina Art Center joins in the international celebration of Arts and Healthcare Awareness Month; and WHEREAS, Arts and Healthcare Awareness Month will increase knowledge about how the arts improve patient outcomes by creating a safer, more supportive healthcare environment. Caregivers have an opportunity for creative self- expression and benefit the community by engaging people in arts programs focused on prevention and wellness; and WHEREAS, Edina has a large population of healthcare workers and more than 7,500 students involved in art activities at the Edina Art Center. Thousands of viewers can enjoy public art exhibits throughout the community, providing a rare sanctuary of beauty for contemplation and solitude. WHEREAS, for healthcare workers the arts will improve observational, diagnostic and empathetic abilities. The arts will help them to understand patients in a new way and connect with them on a more compassionate level. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the City of Edina City Council, do hereby proclaim November 2010 as Arts and Healthcare Awareness Month in Edina Dated this 19th day of October, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 5, 2010 7:05 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Housh. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council consent agenda with the exceptions of Items IV.D., Resolution No. 2010 -95 restricting parking along West 58th Street from France to Xerxes; IV.E., Resolution No. 2010 -95 revising speed limit on West 58th Street from France to Xerxes; and, IV.L., Resolution 2010 -97 approving cooperative construction agreement with MNDOT for TH169/1494 interchange project. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. YOUTH EXCHANGE RECOGNITION POSTPONED Motion made by Member Brindle, seconded by Member Swenson, to postpone consideration of Resolution No. 2010 -90, welcoming youth exchange students, to the October 19, 2010, meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2009 WATER FLUORIDATION QUALITY AWARD PRESENTED Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle presented the Minnesota Department of Health Award the City received recognizing Edina's water fluoridation system that had operated at an optimal level for all twelve months of 2009. AMERICA'S PROMISE AWARD PRESENTED Carolyn Schroeder, 4917 Arden Avenue, president of the Edina Community Foundation, presented the recently awarded America's Promise Award recognizing that Edina was one of America's best 100 communities for young people. Ms. Schroeder recognized Heather Haen Anderson, Executive Director of Edina Connecting With Kids, Julie Rogers Bascom, Service Learning Coordinator for the Edina Public Schools, Arrie Larsen Manti of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, and the students not present who also had helped with Edina's application these in atteRdaRGe who had collaborated to make Edina a great community and thanked them for their contribution. Mayor Hovland thanked those involved, and the Council and audience responded with a round of applause. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2010, AND WORK SESSIONS OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2010, SEPTEMBER 28 2010, AND JOINT MEETING WITH THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT OF SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the regular meeting of September 21, 2010, and work sessions of September 21, 2010, September 28, 2010, and joint meeting with Three Rivers Park District of September 29, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — PERMIT TO KEEP MORE THAN THREE ANIMALS APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Police Chief Long presented the application to keep more than three animals at 6529 McCauley Trail West. He described the unsanitary conditions due to multiple pets found by Solvei Wilmot, Edina Department of Health, during her August 4, 2010, inspection. The applicants, Dr. and Mrs. Juodis submitted an included with their application for a pet permit g letters of support from two medical doctors and two veterinarians . Chief Long advised that by September 13, 2010, there had been major improvements to the living conditions and cleanliness of Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5. 2010 the residence. He noted the city had not received any animal - related calls for service at the proponent's residence. Chief Long recommended approval of the requested permit subject to continued monitoring by the Animal Control Officer on a scheduled basis. In addition, as pets pass away the proponents shall not replace them to bring the number of pets into compliance with the ordinance. The Council acknowledged this was an unusual recommendation given the number of pets and initial condition of the property. Chief Long explained that typically staff would have recommended denial; however, in this case the application included letters from the daughter's pediatrician and father's doctor expressing concern that loss of the pets could result in a significant emotional impact. The letters also addressed the medical therapeutic benefits provided by the pets A-Rd PARta-Ftp-d it would sreateh.ede#4meat_P1 tQ- Terneve the animals. Chief Long stated due to the medical benefits and concerns, and since there had been no complaints or response to the mailed notice staff determined to recommend approval in this particular case. The Council asked questions of Chief Long regarding the importance of continued inspection to assure the living conditions do not deteriorate. It was indicated this could be a condition of permit approval and that the City became aware of the situation when asked by Hennepin County Adult Protection Services to inspect the interior of the home. Proponent Presentation Kristin Heebner, attorney with Moss & Barnett, 90 South 7t' Street, Suite 4800, Minneapolis, representing the proponents, introduced the Dr. Edward and Sandra Juodis and Veterinarian Daniel Shebuski. She stated this was an unusual circumstance given the medical conditions of Dr. Juodis and his daughter Kathryn Metzger. Ms. Heebner stated the Juodis proposed to sign a letter of attrition that agreed pets would not be replaced once deceased until the number of pets in the home complied with Edina's code. She pointed out 13 letters of support had been submitted with no letters submitted in opposition. Ms. Heebner reviewed the circumstances that resulted in inspection of the home and advised that all issues had been remedied including training for the animals. She requested that after hearing testimony from all interested persons, the Council approve the requested permit. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the permit application of Edward and Sandra Juodis, 6529 McCauley Trail West, to keep more than three animals conditioned on providing reasonable, scheduled inspection of the premises and that once animals were deceased they were not replaced until the number of pets in the household complied with Edina code. The Council noted that it had considered a similar request previously. However, that application contained no supperting documentation of support and had a significant history of complaints from neighbors. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED — PINSTRIPES Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5. 2010 City Clerk Mangen presented the request of Pinstripes, Inc. for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday on -sale liquor licenses at 5849 Gallagher Drive. She advised the application and submittals complied with code requirements, inspections were in compliance, and staff recommended approval. The Council inquired about the timing for alcohol awareness training. Ms. Mangen explained the terms of licensure and that 75% of the employees had to have completed compliance training within 30 days of opening. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday on -sale liquor licenses for Pinstripes, Inc., 5849 Gallagher Drive, for a term beginning October 5, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Dale Schwartz, Pinstripes founder and CEO, stated Pinstripes would offer a sophisticated bowling, bocce, bistro venue. Mr. Schwartz said they were looking forward to being part of the Edina community. He added the grand opening and ribbon cutting would be November 18, 2010. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED — MOZZA MIA Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Ms. Mangen presented the request of Mozza Mia LCC, dba as Mozza Mia, for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday on -sale liquor licenses at 3910 West 50th Street. She advised the application and submittals complied with code requirements and inspections were in compliance. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday on -sale liquor licenses for Mozza Mia, 3910 West 50th Street, for a term beginning October 5, 2010 and ending March 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Alan Ackerberg, 4200 Forest Road, St. Louis Park, stated this would be their third restaurant, and they were thrilled to continue to grow in Edina. He thanked staff for their assistance, reviewed their pizzeria menu selections, and indicated they would open on November 22, 2010. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY PRESENTED Mr. Houle presented the City's assessment policy that was adopted on September 7, 2010, and would apply to each project being considered tonight. Payback options were to pay the entire balance, partially pay prior to certification, make no payment Page 3 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /October 5. 2010 so the amount would be certified to the County for collection, or apply for assessment deferral. He displayed an example of the invoice that was sent to property owners. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — IMPROVEMENT NOS. A -213, L-43, A -214, AND L-49 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Houle described the project boundaries and improvements made with the Edina Country Club neighborhood reconstruction, Improvement Nos. A -213, L -43, A -214 and L -49. He advised that the project costs for Nos. A -213 and A -214 equaled $15,796,000, and the City's portion was $8,208,900. Assessments costs for Nos. A -213 and L-43 were $11,466.98 per residential equivalent unit (REU) compared to the estimated assessment of $11,810 REU. The sanitary sewer services assessment would be $4,705.15. Assessments costs for Nos. A -214 and L-49 were $15,370.74 REU compared to the estimated assessment of $16,900 REU. The sanitary sewer services assessment would be $5,018.96. Mr. Houle displayed a map depicting the two Edina Country Club assessment districts. The assessment term was for ten years at an interest rate of 5.75 %. He referenced communication received from residents and recommended approval of the two final assessment rolls. The Council discussed the potential to extend the assessment period beyond ten years. Finance Director Wallin advised the bonds received in 2008 for the Country Club projects were ten -year bonds. The bonds would be paid from assessment receipts so the special assessment terms should coincide with the bonds' term to lessen the possibility of a deficit fund balance. He added the interest rate was set at 2% over the true interest bond rate of 3.75% because State Statute required the City levy 105% of the debt requirement in both principle and interest. Mr. Wallin explained that the call provision for the bonds was six to seven years, so prepayments had to be financed and costs covered for bond issuance and servicing. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Public Testimony Larry Cheng, 4505 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council. David Pearson, 4513 Browndale Avenue, addressed the Council. Carolyn Schroeder, 4917 Arden Avenue, addressed the Council. Joyce Mellom, 4506 Arden Avenue, addressed the Council. Keith Wolf, 4600 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the Council. Justin Cole, 4503 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council. Ralph Tully, 4619 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the issues raised during public testimony and asked questions of staff. Mr. Houle stated it was correct that ponding occurred in some sidewalk areas; however, the intent was not to replace all sidewalks, only correct trip hazards. Areas of cracked concrete curbing would be replaced by the contractor prior to expiration of the one -year warranty period. Residents were asked to contact staff if they would like an area inspected to determine if it met the criteria for warranty repair. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5, 2010 The Council discussed whether additional inspection should be conducted during winter weather to determine if icing conditions warranted a correction. Mr. Houle indicated that winter inspections could be made but the question was how to fund corrections since it was not a budgeted item and could not be assessed at that time. He noted that individual property owners were responsible to maintain and shovel sidewalks in front of their property and that would include correction of settlement. City Attorney Knutson concurred it was the property owner's responsibility to maintain the sidewalks and advised that the City would not be liable under Chapter 466. Chad Millner, Short Elliot Henderson, Inc., advised that in some instances the sidewalk panels were raised and replaced at the same height as existed. If determined to be a one -half inch trip hazard, that panel was replaced and blended with the abutting panels. If the sidewalk panel was cracked, it was replaced. Mr. Houle estimated the cost to replace all sidewalks in the project would have increased costs by $1,000 to $1,500 per home. The Council noted that a Sidewalk Utility would provide a means to finance this type of sidewalk repair and may warrant future consideration. With regard to the number of bicycle - related signs from 44th to 50th Streets, Mr. Houle displayed a picture of the signage and explained the signs were installed in accordance with the Bike Manual; however, the number could be scaled down. The Council agreed to ask the Bike Edina Task Force for its recommendation on reduced signage placement. Following discussion, the Council asked staff to work proactively with residents to inform them of the process to contact the City's insurance provider if they believed their home was damaged as a result of the project, options to level sidewalk panels, and for the City Arborist to speak with residents who were concerned about their trees. Mr. Wallin clarified that the City's purpose was not to make money on the 2% charged over the bond's true interest rate, but to avoid a situation of negative arbitrage due to prepayments, bond costs, and under payments. He noted that the bonds for this project were sold in the market two years ago. Interim Manager Worthington stated another option was for the resident to finance on the open market at a more advantageous interest rate and prepay the assessment. The Council asked staff to inspect the crosswalk brick during the warranty period. Mr. Houle described the methods used with different plowing blades to reduce damage to curbs and pavers. He asked residents to inform staff about areas where crosswalk brick was broken. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -81, levying special assessments for Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction Public Improvements A -213 and L-43. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -93, levying special assessments for Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction Public Improvements A -214 and L-49. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -82 ADOPTED — MIRROR LAKES NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -356 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Houle described the improvements made with the Mirror Lakes neighborhood reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -356. He advised that the project costs equaled $765,849.14, and the City's Page 5 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /October S. 2010 portion was $376,153.84. Assessments costs were $6,088.99 per REU compared to the estimated assessment of $9,375.16 per REU, or a 35.5% reduction due to the competitive bidding environment. He displayed a map identifying the assessment area and stated this assessment would be for a term of ten years at 5.75% interest. Mr. Houle recommended approval of the final assessment roll. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Assistant City Engineer Sullivan advised this project was finalized in September, and staff was not aware of outstanding issues, and residents had been informed that the one -year warranty period was close to expiring. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -82, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -83 ADOPTED — ST. JOHN'S PARK NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -357 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Houle described the project boundaries and improvements made with the St. John's Park neighborhood reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -357. He advised that the project costs equaled $1,944,654.69 and the City's portion was $839,135.48. Assessments costs were $6,477.53 per REU compared to the estimated assessment of $9,300.00 per REU, or a 30.35% reduction. He displayed a map identifying the assessment area and REU rates to be assessed. He stated this assessment would be for a term of ten years at 5.75% interest and recommended approval of the final assessment roll. The Council asked whether there were outstanding issues. Mr. Houle stated two letters had been received objecting to the cost of the assessments. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:42 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -83, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council noted one letter of objection was due to a financial hardship. Mr. Houle reviewed available payment options and suggested the resident be referred to the Edina's Resource Center. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5, 2040 PUBLIC HEARING HELD — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -84 ADOPTED — SOUTH GARDEN ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -358 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Houle described the project boundaries and improvements made with the South Garden Estates neighborhood reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -358. He advised that the project costs equaled $495,247.48 and the City's portion was $309,088.27. Assessments costs were $5,423.80 per REU compared to the estimated assessment of $8,931.15 per REU, or a 39.27% reduction. He displayed a map identifying the assessment area and REU rates to be assessed. Mr. Houle identified a location where water flowed on the pavement and explained that instead of extending a costly stormwater pipe, it would be scheduled for more frequent street sweeping. He stated this assessment would be for a term of ten years at 5.75% interest and recommended approval of the final assessment roll. The Council asked if there were any outstanding issues with this project. Mr. Houle explained how residents could report a problem and advised that some areas of cracked concrete curb had been identified and would be monitored. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:49 p.m. Public Testimony Ronald Rich, 7008 West Shore Drive, addressed the Council. Ms. Worthington explained when the City borrowed money it was anticipated that a certain number of the assessments would be prepaid. Ms. Worthington said the difficulty with estimating how many residents will prepay and the City's cost of borrowing was a part of the misunderstanding. She explained that statute required the City to charge a higher interest rate than borrowed at to cover that gap. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the issue raised regarding the warranty period and whether it could be extended, especially for concrete work. Mr. Houle explained that a two -year warranty would increase the project cost but it was being considered due to concrete issues that occur after a freeze /thaw cycle. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -84, levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CHANGE ORDER EDINA PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING — IMPROVEMENT PW -1, CONTRACT NO. 4C: SITE CONCRETE Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving change order for Edina Public Works Building, Improvement PW -1, Contract No. 4C, site concrete to North Country Concrete. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -15 ADOPTED — AMENDING SECTION 900 EDINA LIQUOR CODE Chief Long commented on the need to clarify the criteria to approve an event manager, officer training, and assumption of liability. Ms. Worthington concurred that the Police Chief should not have to evaluate the credentials of the person designated as manager, and the liability of that position should rest with the applicant, not the City. Following discussion of the ordinance language, Council consensus was reached to make the following revisions to indicate: Section 900.09, Section 3, Subd. 6, Temporary Licenses: "In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no more than two such licenses shall be issued to Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5. 2010 the same organization or corporation for any one location with at least 30 days between issue dates. Each license shall be issued for not more than two consecutive days." Section 900.13, Section 4, Subd. 3, Manager: "The premises shall be under the direct supervision of a manager designated by the applicant in the application." Section 900.13, Section 4, Subd. 4: "That applicant shall provide, at the applicant's expense, policing of the licensed premises either by off -duty Edina City police officers or a security company approved by the Police Department." Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -15, amending the Edina City code concerning liquor, as revised. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL DISCUSSION Park and Recreation Director Keprios asked the Council to determine a process for consideration of the Nine Mile Creek regional trail and whether a single public hearing should be scheduled for a future Council meeting. He advised that the Park Board would consider the matter at its October 12, 2010, meeting and informally accept testimony of the public. Attorney Knutson advised that the Council had discretion to direct the Park Board whether or not to receive public comment. The Council determined to allow this discretion to the Park Board Chair. HoweveF, The Council cautioned that if comment was taken, each speaker should be deemed to speak only for him or her self. It was suggested that representatives of Three Rivers Park District, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and Bonestroo also be in attendance. The Council also discussed available dates to set a single public hearing that allowed the Park Board the ability to hold twe Fneetings a second meeting to draft its recommendation. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, setting a public hearing on December 7, 2010, on the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed whether a recommendation should be requested from the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) since one segment was a roadside route. Mr. Keprios stated he would ask the Park Board to indicate whether it would benefit from an ETC recommendation would be "RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -86 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING SAFE & SOBER GRANT AGREEMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -86, authorizing execution of Safe and Sober Grant Agreement. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. RESOLUTION NOS. 2010 -94 AND 2010 -95 ADOPTED — RESTRICTING PARKING AND REVISING SPEED LIMIT ALONG WEST 58TH STREET FROM FRANCE TO XERXES The Council discussed the challenges of configuring parking restrictions and on- street bike lanes and considered whether a "walkable zone" with lowered speed limits, unique to E , should be created around this and other parks to assure pedestrian and bicycle safety. It was indicated that high "walkability" scores for residential properties also increased value. Mr. Houle reviewed the widths of bike trails that shared roadways and explained the intent was to lower speed in areas of on- street bike lanes on this MSA roadway. The Council considered whether action should be postponed to allow time to research creating a "walkable zone" or if these actions should be taken so it could be determined whether they were effective. Members Bennett and Brindle requested that a joint work session with staff Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5. 2010 and the ETC should be held to discuss the option of a "walkable zone" to increase pedestrian and bicycle safety. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -94, relating to parking restrictions on West 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue and No. 2010 -95, reducing the speed limit on West 58th Street between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET (OCTOBER 19. 2010) PLANNING ITEMS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson setting public hearing date of October 19, 2010, for 1. Final Development Plan, Velmeir Companies, CVS Pharmacy, 6905 York Avenue; and, 2. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning, YMCA, 7355 York Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -89 ADOPTED — APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR GENERAL ELECTION Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -89, appointing general election judges for the November 2, 2010, general election. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -92 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING FACSIMILE SIGNATURES Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -92, authorizing use of facsimile signatures by public officials. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -91 ADOPTED — SETTING INTERIM CITY MANAGER SALARY Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010- 91, establishing the salary for Interim City Manager. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -85 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -85 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -96 ADOPTED — APPROVING MASTER UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR TH169/1494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -96, approving master utility agreement with Mn /DOT for TH169/1494 interchange project S.P. 2776 -03. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -97 ADOPTED — APPROVING COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH MN /DOT FOR TH169/1494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT Mr. Houle presented the revised cooperative construction agreement with Mn /DOT for the TH169 and 1494 interchange project and noted the revisions made by legal counsel to assure Mn /DOT project change orders would not impact the City's contribution and to reflect that improvements to Valley View Road would be considered by Mn /DOT in the future. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -97, approving cooperative construction agreement with Mn /DOT for TH169/1494 interchange project S.P. 2776 -03. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 5, 2010 Scott Peterson, Mn /DOT Area Engineer, advised that the best value bid was submitted by McCrossan & Kramer at $125 million. He reviewed the anticipated time table and process that would be used. Mr. Houle stated that Cemstone requested to create a batch plant south of the public safety training facility so staff may be able to negotiate positive tradeoffs for this two to three year lease. *AMENDMENT TO FINAL PLAN APPROVED — INTERLACHEN MAINTENANCE FACILITY Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving an amendment to the final plan, Interlachen Maintenance Facility. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 23, 2010, and consisting of 35 pages: General Fund $481,324.70; Communications Fund $4,596.31; Police Special Revenue $2,882.63; Working Capital Fund $950,489.09; Equipment Replacement Fund $77,118.34; Art Center Fund $3,265.67; Golf Dome Fund $1,226.22; Aquatic Center Fund $5,727.17; Golf Course Fund $96,244.63; Ice Arena Fund $12,853.22; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $45,615.40; Liquor Fund $198,336.57; Utility Fund $187,170.15; Storm Sewer Fund $269,615.23; PSTF Agency Fund $3,248.59; Payroll Fund $4,997.74; TOTAL $2,344,711.66 and for approval of payment of claims dated September 30, 2010, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $56,540.02; Communications Fund $5,141.10; Police Special Revenue $614.96; Working Capital Fund $72,680.41; Equipment Replacement Fund $20,231.73; Art Center Fund $14,888.34; Aquatic Center Fund $2,231.03; Golf Course Fund $19,911.92; Ice Arena Fund $749.15; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $26,662.62; Liquor Fund $164,612.78; Utility Fund $64,523.34; Storm Sewer Fund $100,893.74; Recycling Fund $32.57; PSTF Agency Fund $12,423.58; TOTAL $562,137.29. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. INTERIM MANAGER WORTHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGED The Council acknowledged Interim Manager Worthington's last meeting, extended its appreciation, and wished her the best in her new position with Ramsey County. Those present responded with a round of applause. Ms. Worthington indicated it had been an honor to serve Edina and that it had a wonderful staff. STUDY SESSION CANCELLED Council consensus was reached to cancel the October 26, 2010, study session. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 19, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 5, 2010, meeting available. Page 10 MINUTES. OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 5, 2010 5:05 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh was absent. , Staff present: Heather Worthington, Interim City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric .Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant.to the City Manager; John Keprios, Park Director; Ed MkI-1olda, Assistant Park Director; Todd Anderson, Braemar Golf Course Manager; Doug Bauman, Braemar Arena Manager; and Debra °Mangen, City,-Clerk. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order and stated the. purpose of the meeting was to review the 2011 Proposed Enterprise Operating Budget "and Capital Improvement Programs for 2011 -2015. Edina Aquatics Center: Assistant Director MacHolda outlined the history and rationale for the proposed purchased of the Flow Rider. He noted where it would be located and the target market he hoped to capture with the new venue. Council discussed the importance of keeping the Aquatic Center fresh, whether or not enterprises. that had positive cash flows should be subsidizing other less profitable enterprises and the timing of the purchase of the Flow Rider. Consensus was. the Flow Rider would be purchased during the season of 2011. Braemar Arena: Manager Bauman explained the West arena would be making ice by November 2, 2010, noting that was an extremely tight schedule. He stated new projects in the CIP for the Arena would be the staging of parking lot improvements in 2011, 2012 and 2013. The discussion included: the operation of the concessions, community interest in building locker rooms for boys and girls High School hockey, and the debt service remaining on the Arena. Braemar Golf Course: Manager Anderson noted that a large item in the CIP'was the potential replacement of the Golf Dome. He and Director Keprios +� as noted the Dome kept golf alive during the winter months and was also used by Lacrosse, softball and soccer youth. programs. There was a discussion'of the -debt the Golf Course carried, how that debt was structured, the impact of purchasing Fred Richards, the condition of the driving range, the Braemar Memorial Fund and its potential use, and the status of golfing. Finance Director Wallin said the last Braemar bond payment would. be made in2013. Park and Recreation CIP: Director Keprios reviewed the significant CIP items. He noted the replacement of the Arneson Greenhouse,. the Rosland Park Pathway, the Garden Park parking lot renovation, and noted that for the last three years 48% of the Park Department CIP has been asphalt repair. Mr. Keprios added that the Committee was forming for the Veterans Memorial and stated that if an infusion of parkland dedication fees was received, he felt that should go to master plan. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 5, 2010. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 1r� ow e ch A �y • ,��RPOFIA��� IB08 RE PO RURECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: III.E. From: Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: March 1, 2011 Subject: Parking Permits for All Employees of Edina Businesses at 50th & France ACTION REQUESTED: To help alleviate parking concerns in the area, the 50th & France Business & Professional Association would like the City to require both full- and part -time employees of Edina businesses who drive to work hold parking permits and park exclusively in the designated "permit only" areas of the municipal ramps. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: An estimated 1,563 employees work in the 50th & France area. Of those, an estimated 1,203 are employed by Edina businesses. Parking in the area includes: Three (3) Edina municipal parking ramps -- 1,002 spaces Edina 5 -0 Mall surface lot — 25 spaces Ewing surface lot (Minneapolis) — 83 spaces Vehicles can park in the ramps for a maximum of five hours. However, employees working on the Edina side of the commercial area may purchase parking permits to park in designated areas for more than five hours. Approximately 200 Edina full -time employees buy parking permits from the City. If part-time employees work less than five hours, they do not need to buy a parking pass or even park in areas intended for employee parking. Association staff and Board members have observed employees parking in all sections of the ramps, not necessarily in the permit -only areas, taking premium spots away from patrons of the shops and restaurants in the area. Association staff recommends that all employees of Edina businesses at,50th & France be required to purchase parking passes, regardless of full- or part-time employment status. This would allow the Police Department to more easily provide enforcement to those who violate the parking requirements in the three ramps. Association staff recommends part-time employees be charged half the price for a permit, $2.50 per month instead of $5 per month. However, City staff believes that tracking employment status of permit applicants would be cumbersome and recommends the permit remain at $5 per,month, regardless of the number of hours a permit holder works in the`area. 501h & France Business & Professional Association Executive Director Rachel Hubbard . and Board of Directors President Diana Fleetham will be, present at the meeting to; answer questions. IONAIn I INIR 1e REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item II. A. 1. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direc Consent F-1 Park & Recreation Information Only ❑ Date: October 19, 2010 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Aquatic Weeds Improvement ® Motion Special Assessment #AQ -10 ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt proposed special assessments for aquatic weed treatment of. 1. Arrowhead Lake 2. Indianhead Lake 3. Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond INFOBACKGROUND: Each year, the Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake homeowners associations request the City to provide weed management and water treatment services for which are agreed to be paid by special assessment. Both Indianhead and Arrowhead Lakes are treated for aquatic weeds, and provided with aerators to further control aquatic weed growth and help oxygenate the water to avoid fish winter -kill. Indianhead and Arrowhead Lakes were both treated with blue dye to add color to the lake water and retard algae growth. The proposed assessment per home for each of the 37 Arrowhead Lake residents is $445.81, and the proposed assessment per home for each of the 33 Indianhead Lake residents is $440.96. 2 The 37 Arrowhead Lake resident addresses are: 1. 6327 Timber Tr. 2. 6328 Timber Tr. 3. 6318 Mcintyre Pt. 4. 6314 Mcintyre Pt. 5. 6310 McIntyre Pt 6. 6401 McCauley Circle 7. 6405 McCauley Circle 8. 6409 McCauley Circle 9. 6416 McCauley Circle 10. 6411 McCauley Circle 11. 6316 Post Lane 12.6312 Post Lane 13. 6320 Post Lane 14. 6443 McCauley Terrace 15.6700 Indian Hills Rd. 16.6804 Indian Hills Rd. 17. 6808 Margarets Lane 18. 6433 Margarets Lane 19. 6437 Margarets Lane The 33 Indianhead Lake residents are: 1. 6617 Dakota Trl. 2. 6613 Dakota Trl. 3. 6901 Dakota Trl. 4. 6905 Dakota Trl. 5. 6909 Dakota Trl. 6. 6629 Dakota Trl. 7. 6625 Dakota Trl. 8. 6621 Dakota Trl. 9. 6409 Indian Hills Rd. 10. 6405 Indian Hills Rd. 11. 6401 Indian Hills Rd. 12. 6620 Cheyenne Trl. 13.6700 Cheyenne Trl. 14. 6708 Cheyenne Trl. 15. 6624 Cheyenne Trl. 16. 6704 Cheyenne Trl. 17.6928 Valley View Rd. 20. 6728 Indian Hills Rd. 21. 6720 Indian Hills Rd. 22. 6708 Arrowhead Pass 23. 6712 Arrowhead Pass 24. 6802 Indian Hills Rd. 25. 6800 Indian Hills Rd. 26. 6429 Margarets Lane 27. 6616 Indian Hills Cir. 28. 6612 Indian Hills Rd. 29. 6520 Indian Hills Rd. 30. 6436 Timber Ridge 31. 6431 Timber Ridge 32. 6512 Indian Hills Rd. 33. 6516 Indian Hills Rd. 34. 6604 Indian Hills Rd. 35. 6432 Timber Ridge 36. 6311 McIntyre Pt. 37. 6322 McIntyre Pt 18. 6932 Valley View Rd. 19. 6936 Valley View Rd. 20. 6940 Valley View Rd. 21. 6816 Cheyenne Cir. 22. 6812 Cheyenne Cir 23. 6808 Cheyenne Cir. 24. 6804 Cheyenne Tr. 25. 6800 Cheyenne Trl. 26. 6920 Valley View Rd. 27. 6801 Dakota Trl. 28. 6805 Dakota Trl. 29. 6809 Dakota Trl. 30. 6813 Dakota Trl. 31. 6817 Dakota Trl. 32. 6926 Valley View Rd. 33. 6820 Cheyenne Cir Each year, residents whose properties abut the Mill Pond section of Minnehaha Creek ask the City to monitor aquatic weed growth in the Mill Pond section and, if necessary, contract mechanical removal of aquatic vegetation in that area. A permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is required for any mechanical removal of aquatic vegetation. The permit must be secured and paid for in advance to allow for timely removal of aquatic weeds when and if they appear. The proposed special assessment for each of these 63 homes is $223.75, which covers the cost of mechanical weed harvesting, the Minnesota DNR permit fee and monthly inspections. All proposed assessments include a $3.00 per home administrative fee. The 63 homes along the Mill Pond are: 1. 4507 Browndale Ave. 2. 4509 Browndale Ave. 3. 4511 Browndale Ave. 4. 4513. Browndale Ave. 5. 4504 °Browndale Ave. 6. 4601 Sunnyside Rd. 7. 4603 Sunnyside Rd. 8. 4605 Sunnyside Rd. 9. 4701 Sunnyside Rd. 10: 4703 Sunnyside Rd. 11.4705 Sunnyside Rd. 12.4707 Sunnyside Rd. 13.4801 Sunnyside Rd. 14. 4805 Sunnyside Rd. 15.4807 Sunnyside Rd. 16.4901 Sunnyside Rd. 17.4903 Sunnyside Rd. 18.4905 Sunnyside Rd. 19. 4907 Sunnyside Rd. 20. 4909 Sunnyside Rd. 21. 4911 Sunnyside Rd. 22.4518 Browndale Ave. 23.4800 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 24. 4804 Sunnyslope Rd. E 25.4805 Sunnyslope Rd. E 26.4801 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 27. 4800 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 28.4804 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 29.4808 Sunnyslope Rd. W: 30.4812 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 31. 4506 Browndale Ave. 32.4808 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 33.4800 Woodhill Way 34. 49.01 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 35.4909 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 36, 49.13 Sunnyslope Rd: E:.. Sunnyslope<Rd. E. 38.4921 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 39.4925 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 40.4929 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 41. 4820 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 42.4824 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 43.4828 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 44. 4832 Sunnyslope Rd. W. 45.4905 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 46.4907 Sunnyslope Rd. E. 47.4520 Browndale Ave. 48.4614 Edgebrook Pl. 49.4618 Edgebrook Pl. 50. 4622 Edgebrook Pl. 51. 4600 Browndale Ave. 52.4602 Browndale Ave. 53.4604 Browndale Ave. 54.4610 Browndale' Ave. 55.4012 Edgebrook Place 56. 4.626 Edgebrook Pl 57.4630 Edgebrook Pl. 58.4634 Edgebrook Pl. 59.463.8 Edgebrook Pl. 60.4640 Edgebrook Pl. 61.4909 Browndale Ave. 62. 4905 Browndale Ave. 63.4933 Sunnyslope Rd. E. Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, administers the above aquatic weed management programs. A one year assessment period is proposed for all of these special assessments. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -98 LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR MPROVEMENT NO., AQ -10 AQUATIC WEEDS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -10 — Arrowhead, Indianhead Lakes and Minnehaha Creek Millpond BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Aquatic Weeds AQ -10 Levy No. 17706 1 year 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Dated: October 19, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor City Hall Park and Recreation Department 952 - 826 -0367 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0385 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -98 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk 7!A 0 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direct Park & Recreation Dep ment Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Weed Cutting Improvement Special Assessment #WD -10 RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item II. A. 2. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends 1:1 ❑ To HRA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Assess the following costs to the property owners for weed cutting services provided at the addresses listed below: 1. 5125 W. 49t' St. $ 180.00 2. 5120 W. 49" St. $ 180.00 3. 6802 Indian Hills Rd. $ 480.00 4. Empty Lots @ Vernon & Vernon Lane $ 293.00 5. 5717 Continental Drive $ 180.00 6. 4308 W. 70`h St. $ 105.00 7. 6228 Parkwood Rd. $ 780.00 8. 5030 Green Farms Rd. $ 255.00 9. 6800 Indian Hills Rd. $ 180.00 TOTAL $2,633.00 The totals include a $30.00 per property administration fee. 2 INFOBACKGROUND: The weeds on the 9 properties listed above were cut by the Edina Park and Recreation Maintenance Department during the summer of 2010. The cost of tractor use and personnel needed to cut the weeds is proposed to be assessed to the property owners. There is a $30.00 administration fee for each property, which is included in each total shown above. Taken directly from the City Code: 1050.05 Maintenance Standards. Every owner of property shall maintain the vegetation growing thereon according to the following minimum standards: Subd. 2 Weeds. Weeds shall be regularly cut or controlled such that no individual plant shall exceed at any time ten inches in height or length as measured from its base at the ground to the tip of each stalk, stem, blade or leaf. Noxious weeds as defined by the State Commissioner ofAgriculture shall be eradicated. As a matter of practice, our part-time Weed Inspector employee first attempts to hand - deliver a written notice to the property owner. If the homeowner is not home, the Weed Inspector then attempts to reach the homeowner by phone, which most often takes care of the matter. If the homeowner cannot be reached by phone, then the Weed Inspector mails to the property owner a certified letter explaining that they have 10 days to comply or the City will cut the weeds /vegetation and assess the property. A one -year assessment period is proposed for all 9 assessments listed above. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -99 LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR MPROVEMENT NO., WD -10 WEED MOWING City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Weed Mowing Improvement No. WD -10 — Various Properties with the City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Weed Mowing WD -10 Levy No. 17705 1 year 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Dated: October 19, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 Park and Recreation Department www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 826 -0367 FAX 952- 826 -0385 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -99 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: From: Date: Subject: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council.` John Keprios, Direct r i7 Park & Recreation Depa ment October 19, 2010 Tree Removal Improvement Special Assessment #TR -10 RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item II. A. 3. Consent 1:1 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Assess the costs to remove diseased elm tree(s) to the owners of the properties listed below: 5429 Halifax Lane $3,045.94 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $3,075.94 (3 yr. assessment) 4425 Rutledge Ave. $2,163.44 2 Elm Trees 30.00 Admin. Fee $2,193.44 (3 yr. assessment) 7116 Valley View Road $ 507.66 1 Elm Tree $ 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 537.66 (2 yr. assessment) 5800 York Ave. $2,057.34 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $2,087.34 (3 yr. assessment) 6309 Brookview Ave. $ 667.97 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 697.97 (2 yr. assessment) \ 29J, `/ \ 01., To: From: Date: Subject: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council.` John Keprios, Direct r i7 Park & Recreation Depa ment October 19, 2010 Tree Removal Improvement Special Assessment #TR -10 RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item II. A. 3. Consent 1:1 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Assess the costs to remove diseased elm tree(s) to the owners of the properties listed below: 5429 Halifax Lane $3,045.94 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $3,075.94 (3 yr. assessment) 4425 Rutledge Ave. $2,163.44 2 Elm Trees 30.00 Admin. Fee $2,193.44 (3 yr. assessment) 7116 Valley View Road $ 507.66 1 Elm Tree $ 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 537.66 (2 yr. assessment) 5800 York Ave. $2,057.34 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $2,087.34 (3 yr. assessment) 6309 Brookview Ave. $ 667.97 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 697.97 (2 yr. assessment) Assess the costs to remove diseased elm tree(s) to the owners of the properties listed below: 5429 Halifax Lane $3,045.94 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $3,075.94 (3 yr. assessment) 4425 Rutledge Ave. $2,163.44 2 Elm Trees 30.00 Admin. Fee $2,193.44 (3 yr. assessment) 7116 Valley View Road $ 507.66 1 Elm Tree $ 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 537.66 (2 yr. assessment) 5800 York Ave. $2,057.34 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $2,087.34 (3 yr. assessment) 6309 Brookview Ave. $ 667.97 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 697.97 (2 yr. assessment) 6313 Brookview Ave. $ 667.97 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 697.97 (2 yr. assessment) 4500 Edina Blvd. $ 801.56 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $ 831.56 (2 yr. assessment) 6112 Kellogg Ave. $1,928.12 1 Elm Tree 30.00 Admin. Fee $1,958.12 (3 yr. assessment) INFOBACKGROUND: The above 8 properties collectively had a total of (9) diseased elm trees removed. The diseased elm trees were removed in accordance with City Code. Section 1055, Control and Prevention of Shade Tree Diseases. Property owners were first given an opportunity to remove the diseased tree(s) within a three -week (21 days) period of time. If the tree(s) is not removed within that period of time, the City contracts the removal of the diseased tree(s) and assesses the property owner. The property owners at the addresses above chose to have the City contract the removal of their diseased tree(s) in 2010 and have the cost of removal assessed to their property. This practice prevents the spread of Dutch Elm Disease and is mandated by Minnesota State Statutes. The guideline used to set the length of the assessment period is: ❑ Under $500.00 = one year assessment. ❑ $500 to under $1,000 = two year assessment. ❑ $1,000 and up = three year assessment. ❑ Additional years upon request. When the City is requested to (or forced to) contract the removal of a diseased shade tree on private property, the City Forester asks the property owner if they wish to have the tree stump removed at their expense. State and City law does not demand that tree stumps be removed; only the diseased bark must be removed. Minnesota State Statute 18.023 demanded tree stump removal; however, that State law was repealed in 2003. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -100 . LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR MPROVEMENT NO., TR -10 TREE TRIMMING City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by/ law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to'the:'proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Tree Trimming Improvement No. TR -10 —Various Properties with the City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota °as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited'by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Tree Trimming TR -10 Levy No. 17703 Three Years Tree Trimming TR -10 Levy No. 17704 Two Years 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property; to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, 'at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Dated: October 19, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor City Hall Park and Recreation Department 952- 826 -0367 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0385 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 S . _ - Resolution No. 2010 -100 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk 74 O N REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # II. A. 4 & 5. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action City Engineer ❑ Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Special Assessment Public Hearings: 4. Grandview Business District- Improvement G -10, Resolution No. 2010 -101. 5. 50th and France Business District - Improvement No. M -10, Resolution No. 2010 -102. Recommendation: Approve assessments as proposed for Improvements G -10 and M -10. Info /Background: Attached you will find an Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, and Certificate of Mailing including the Notice of Public Hearing. In addition to each submittal the following comments are submitted for consideration: 4. Improvement G -10 - Grandview Business District. The Grandview maintenance assessment charge changed from 6.79 cents per square foot in 2009 to 5.08 cents in 2010. The 2009 costs were higher due to the amount of plant replacement. As of this writing no other comments have been submitted or called in. 5. Improvement M -10 - 50th & France Business District. The 50th & France maintenance assessment charge changed from 87.02 cents per square foot in 2009 to 78.26 cents in 2010. The 2009 costs were higher due to higher professional service costs (increased parking and streetscape studies) for the area. Staff continues to work with the business owners to stay current with the streetscapes and ramps in the 50th & France Business area. As of this writing no comments have been submitted or called in. ATTACHMENTS: • Improvements G -10 & M -10: Final Project Costs Analysis, Final Assessment Roll, Certificate of Mailing, and Notice of Public Hearing. g: \engineering \assessments \2010 assessments \item ii a 4 n 5 - special assessments pubilc hearings maintenance districts g 10 n m l0.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-101 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Grandview Business District — Improvement No. G -10 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Grandview Business District Levy No. 17709 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -101 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. G -10 LOCATION: GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTRACTOR: PAYROLL $ 6,281.92 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF PERA $ 5.90 EMPLOYERS SHARE OF SOCIAL SECURITY & WORK COMP $ 786.02 EMPLOYERS SHARE OF MEDICAL INSURANCE $ - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: LAWN IRRIGATION - CITY OF EDINA UTILITIES $ 2,806.91 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO $ 5,637.48 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 4,811.67 PLANTS BACHMAN'S $ 3,292.42 TOTAL COST $ 23,622.32 ASSESSABLE UNITS: 465,101 SQUARE FEET ASSESSABLE COST: $ 0.0508 PER SQUARE FOOT LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: 1 YEAR GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT G -10 ASSESSMENT ROLL PID NAME 1 NAME 2 PROPERTY ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP SF ASSESSMENT 28- 117 -21-31 -0004 Holiday Station Stores, Inc. Holiday Station Store #217 5200 Interlachen Blvd. P O Box 1224 Bloomington MN 55440 3,558 $ 180.71 28- 117 -21-31 -0007 Ken Johnson Properties LLC Ken Johnson Properties LLC 5101 Arcadia Av 8608 Lakeview Rd Bloomington MN 55438 3,872 $ 196.66 28- 117 -21 -31 -0010 GFP CO GFP CO 5100 Eden Av P.O. Box 20003 Bloomington MN 55420 35,199 $ 1,787.75 28- 117 -21 -31 -0027 Gaertner Family Invest. Partnership Gaertner Family Invest. Partnership 5000 Vernon Av 246 S Albert St St. Paul MN 55105 5,287 $ 268.52 28- 117 -21 -31 -0033 TIMCIN Properties LLP TIMCIN Properties LLP 5100 Vernon Av 9110 225th St W Lakeville MN 55044 10,544 $ 535.53 28- 117 -21-31 -0043 Children's Heart Link Children's Heart Link 5075 Arcadia Av 5075 Arcadia Av Edina MN 55436 3,710 $ 188.43 28- 117 -21-31 -0046 McReavy Edina Pro erties Washburn McReavy 5001 Vernon Av 2301 Dupont Ave. So. Minneapolis MN 55405 20,338 $ 1,032.96 28- 117 -21 -31 -0064 Jerrys Enterprises Inc Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5125 Vernon Av 5101 Vernon Ave Edina MN 55436 116,512 $ 5,917.60 28- 117 -21-31 -0065 Jerry's Enterprises Inc Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5017 Vernon Av 5101 Vernon Ave Edina MN 55436 19,089 $ 969.52 28- 117 -21 -31 -0067 CSM Investors Inc CSM Corporation 5101 Gus Young La 500 Washington Av, Ste 3000 Minneapolis MN 55415 25,300 $ 1,284.98 Wells Fargo Bank 28- 117 -21-32 -0014 5116 LLC ET AL c/o Deloitte Tax LLP 5116 Vernon Av P. 0. Box 2609 Carlsbad CA 92018 8,672 $ 440.45 Lakepointe Holdings LLC 28- 117 -21- 33-0004 Lake ointe Holdings LLC Attn: William Elliott 5209 Vernon Av 555 W. Brown Deer Rd Fox Point WI 1 53217 997 1 $ 50.64 28- 117 -21- 33-0017 Edina Family Physicians Prop LLC clo Edina Family Physicians Prop LLC 5301 Vernon Av 5301 Vernon Av Edina MN 55436 9,885 1 $ 502.06 28- 117 -21 -34 -0002 Church of Our Lady of Grace Church of Our Lady of Grace 5145 Eden Av 5071 Eden Avenue Edina MN 55436 5,210 $ 264.61 28-117 -21-34 -0004 School District No. 273 Edina Public Schools 5220 Eden Av 5701 Normandale Dr Edina MN 55424 19,005 $ 965.26 28- 117 -21-34 -0005 Inde . School District No. 273 Edina Public Schools 5150 Brookside Av 5701 Normandale Dr Edina MN 55424 7,380 $ 374.83 Speedy SuperAmerica LLC 28- 117 -21-34 -0016 Speedy Su erAmerica LLC C/o Property Tax Records 5205 Vernon Av 539 Main St. So. Findlay OH 45840 2,740 $ 139.16 28- 117 -21 -31 -0065 Jerry's Enterprises Inc Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5019 Vernon Av S 5101 Vernon Av Edina IMN 55436 0 $ - Drs. J T Beecher & J A Rohde 28- 117 -21 -34 -0024 Drs. Beecher & Rohde Partners Edina Family Physicians 5203 Vernon Av 5301 Vernon Av Edina MN 554361 6,131 $ 311.39 28- 117 -21- 34-0025 Jerrys Enterprises Inc Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5201 Vernon Av S 5101 Vernon Av Edina MN 55436 2,320 $ 117.83 Hennepin County Library 28- 117 -21- 33-0048 Hennepin County Libra Attn: Marcia Wilda 5280 Grandview Square #201 417 5th St N. #320 Minneapolis MN 55401 20,000 $ 1,015.79 28- 117 -21 -03 -0047 Senior Center City of Edina 5280 Grandview Square #101 4801 W. 50th Edina MN 55424 20,000 $ 1,015.79 28- 117 -21 -34 -0040 Eden Avenue LLC Eden Avenue LLC 5201 Eden Ave. 3500 American Blvd #200 Bloomington MN 55431 115,952 $ 5,889.16 28- 117 -21 -31 -0049 Edina Liquors City of Edina 5013 Vernon Ave 4801 W. 50th Edina MN 1 55424 3,400 $ 172.68 Assessable Unrm: 465,101 $ 23,622.32 Assessable Cost: 1 $ 0.0508 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates October 1, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for G -10: Grandview Business District Improvement and Maintenance (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of !C,1- , 20 10 Ed�r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 19, 2010, at 7:00 p.m, to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to a proposed special assessment for the following improvement: IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE.NO. G -10: GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All parcels contained within the Grandview Business District. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $23,622.32 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Amount: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2011 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2010 to December 31, 2011. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25 percent of the total assessment has been authorized by ordinance. NO FURTHER STATEMENT WILL BE ISSUED APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL October 1, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk 28- 117 -21 -34 -0005 28- 117 -21 -34 -0016 28- 117 -21 -31 -0065 Edina Public Schools Speedy SuperAmerica LLC Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5701 Normandale Dr c/o Property Tax Records 5101 Vernon Av Edina MN 55424 539 Main St. So. Edina MN 55436 Findlay, OH 45840 ' 28- 117 -21 -34 -0024 28- 117 -21 -34 -0025 28- 117 -21 -33 -0048 Drs. J T Beecher & J A Rohde Jerry's Enterprises Inc Hennepin County Library Edina Family Physicians 5101 Vernon Av Attn: Marcia Wilda 5301 Vernon Av Edina, MN 55436 417 5th St N, #320 Edina, MN 55436 Minneapolis, MN 55401 28- 117 -21 -33 -0047 28- 117 -21 -34 -0040 28- 117 -21 -31 -0049 City of Edina Eden Avenue LLC City of Edina 4801 W. 50th 3500 American Blvd #200 4801 W. 50th Edina, MN 55424 Bloomington, MN 55431 Edina, MN 55424 28- 117 -21 -31 -0004 28- 117 -21 -31 -0007 28- 117 -21 -31 -0010 Holiday Station Store #217 Ken Johnson Properties LLC GFP CO P O Box 1224 8608 Lakeview Rd P.O. Box 20003 loomington, MN 55440 Bloomington, MN 55438 Bloomington, MN 55420 28- 117 -21 -31 -0027 28- 117 -21 -31 -0033 28- 117 -21 -31 -0043 Gaertner Family Invest. Partnership TIMCIN Properties LLP Children's Heart Link 246 S Albert St 9110 225th St W 5075 Arcadia Av St. Paul, MN 55105 Lakeville, MN 55044 Edina, MN 55436 28- 117 -21 -31 -0046 28- 117 -21 -31 -0064 28- 117 -21 -31 -0065 Washburn McReavy Jerry's Enterprises Inc Jerry's Enterprises Inc 2301 Dupont Ave. So. 5101 Vernon Ave 5101 Vernon Ave Minneapolis, MN 55405 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 28- 117 -21 -31 -0067 28- 117 -21 -32 -0014 28- 117 -21 -33 -0004 CSM Corporation Wells Fargo Bank Lakepointe Holdings LLC 500 Washington Av, Ste 3000 c/o Deloitte Tax LLP Attn: William Elliott Minneapolis, MN 55415 P. O. Box 2609 555 W. Brown Deer Rd Carlsbad, CA 92018 Fox Point, WI 53217 28- 117 -21 -33 -0017 28- 117 -21 -34 -0002 28- 117 -21 -34 -0004 c/o Edina Family Physicians Prop LLC Church of Our Lady of Grace Edina Public Schools 5301 Vernon Av 5071 Eden Avenue 5701 Normandale Dr Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55424 28- 117 -21 -34 -0005 28- 117 -21 -34 -0016 28- 117 -21 -31 -0065 Edina Public Schools Speedy SuperAmerica LLC Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5701 Normandale Dr c/o Property Tax Records 5101 Vernon Av Edina MN 55424 539 Main St. So. Edina MN 55436 Findlay, OH 45840 ' 28- 117 -21 -34 -0024 28- 117 -21 -34 -0025 28- 117 -21 -33 -0048 Drs. J T Beecher & J A Rohde Jerry's Enterprises Inc Hennepin County Library Edina Family Physicians 5101 Vernon Av Attn: Marcia Wilda 5301 Vernon Av Edina, MN 55436 417 5th St N, #320 Edina, MN 55436 Minneapolis, MN 55401 28- 117 -21 -33 -0047 28- 117 -21 -34 -0040 28- 117 -21 -31 -0049 City of Edina Eden Avenue LLC City of Edina 4801 W. 50th 3500 American Blvd #200 4801 W. 50th Edina, MN 55424 Bloomington, MN 55431 Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-102 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: 50th and France Business District — Improvement No. M -10 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS 50th and France Business District Levy No. 17708 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2010 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 Resolution No. 2010 -102 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 920 City Clerk CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -10 LOCATION: 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTRACTOR: CITY OF EDINA (LARRY DIEKMAN) $ 88,249.40 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF PERA $ 6,636.85 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF SOCIAL SECURITY & WORK COMP $ 15,229.65 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF MEDICAL INSURANCE $ 14,187.06 PUBLIC WORKS CREW AND 1/2 PARKING MONITOR $ 16,603.96 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $ 5,859.02 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 60,488.83 LIABILITY INSURANCE $ 2,297.99 PARKING RAMP MAINTENANCE (375) $ 69,000.00 EQUIPMENT $ - TOTAL COST $ 278,552.76 ASSESSABLE UNITS: ASSESSABLE COST: 355,953 SQUARE FEET $ 0.7826 PER SQUARE FOOT LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT: 1 YEAR 50TH FRANCE E ;S DISTRICT M ASSESSMENT ROLL PID NAME 1 NAME 2 PROP. ADD. PROP. NO PROP ADDRESS MAILING NO MAILING ADDRESS CITY ST ZJP GBA - SF TOTAL ASSESSABLE SF ASSESSMENT 18-028 -24- 14-0016 WILLIAM C KNAPP ATTN: ACCTNG 4916 France 4916 France 4949 WESTOWN PARKWAY #200 WEST DES MOINES IA 50266 11,105 4,809 $ 3,763.31 18-028.24- 14-0129 FRANK HOLDINGS LLC FRANK HOLDINGS LLC 4936 France 4936 France 5223 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD EDINA MN 55439 18,557 18,557 $ 14,521.87 18 -028 -24. 14-0020 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS C/O K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 4948 France 4948 France 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425 8,280 4,968 $ 3,887.73 18- 028 - 2414-0118 OMG PROPERTIES LLC OMG PROPERTIES LLC 4930 France 4930 France 4930 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 4,199 3,274 $ 2,562.24 18-028 -24-41 -0055 FRANCE AT 50TH LLC FRANCE AT 50TH LLC 503015034 France 5030/5034 France 7800 METRO PKWY, STE. 300 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425 16,368 13,168 $ 10,304.68 18-028 -24-41 -0066 5036 FRANCE AVE S LTD. PTNRSP. PTNRSP. 5036 France 5036 France 5036 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 6,835 6,835 $ 5,348.76 18-028 -24-41 -0383 5000 FRANCE COMPANY 5000 FRANCE COMPANY 5000 France 5000 France 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA MN 55343 24,130 24,130 $ 18,883.05 18-028 -2441 -0237 AMERICANA BANK OF EDINA EXCEL BANK OF EDINA 5050 France 5050 France P.O. BOX 1509 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55480 19,102 12,600 $ 9,859.88 18-028 - 2414 -0024 149.5 LLC 4U.5 LLG C/O JOHN GROSS 3918 W 491/2 3918 IW 4912 4520 ARDEN AVE EDINA MNI 55424 5,307 3,707 $ 2,900.93 18 -028- 2414-0026 3930 BUILDING LLC do JAMES W. NELSON 3930 W49 12 3930 W49 12 7790 LOCHMERE TERR EDINA MN 55439 15,800 13,400 $ 10,486.24 18 -028 -2414 -0035 SOON YONG PARK/JUNG JA PARK PARK 3944 W 49 1/2 3944 W 49 12 5275 GRANDVIEW SO. #3308 EDINA MN 55436 5,061 1,855 $ 1,451.95 18-028 -24- 140108 1905 PARTNERSHIP LLP C/O KLEINMAN REALTY CO 3948 W 49 12 3948 W49 1/2 53011 EAST RIVER RD, #101 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55421 12,084 2,450 $ 1,917.57 18 -028- 24140021 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP FRANCE AVE PROPERTIES Go K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 3902 W 50th 3902 W 50th 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425 13,614 13,614 $ 10,653.70 18- 028- 2414 -0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC EDINA PROPERTIES INC 3906 W 50th 3906 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 31,680 28,480 $ 22,287.16 18-028 - 2414-0046 FIRST BUILDING CORP. clo US BANK N.A. 4100 W 50th 4100 W 50th 2800 E. LAKE ST. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406 44,776 19,176 $ 15,006.27 18-028 - 2414-0121 JSG COMPANY LLP JSG COMPANY LLP 3924 W 50th 3924 W 50th 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA MN 55343 12,960 12,960 $ 10,141.91 18-028 -24- 14-0122 PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION CO. ADMINISTRATION CO. 3922 W 50th 3922 W 50th 3922150TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 12,862 12,862 $ 10,065.22 18 -028- 24140126 L.A. REAL ESTATE GROUP ETAL ETAL 3930 W 50th 3930 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA MN 55424 80,330 59,527 $ 46,582.99 18 -028 -24-01 -0049 EDINA PROPERTIES INC EDINA PROPERTIES INC 3917 W 50th 3917 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA MNI 554241 31,260 22,924 $ 17,939.29 18- 028.24 -41 -0052 JSG COMPANY LLP JSG COMPANY LLP 3911 W 50th 3911 W 50th 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA MN 55343 27,290 27,290 $ 21,355.92 18-028 -24-11 -0178 LUND REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC HOLDINGS LLC 3945 W 50th 3945 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA MN 55424 28,026 14,226 $ 11,132.63 18. 028 -2441 -0181 CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA 3939 W 50th 3939 W 50th 4801 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 8,572 5,143 $ 4,024.84 18- 028 -24-41 -0182 A K LARSON FAMILY LLC A K LARSON FAMILY LLC 3939 W 50th 3939 W 50th 3939150TH ST W#200 EDINA MN 56424 39,242 29,997 $ 23,474.46 Assessable Units: 355,953 $ 278,552.60 Assessable Cost $ 0.7826 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates October 1, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for M -10: 50th & France Business District Improvement and Maintenance (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of ro _ , 20 I 0 . /ll...'.: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on October 19, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to a proposed special assessment for the following improvement: IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE NO. M -10: 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All parcels contained within the 50th & France Business District. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $278,552.60 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AGAINST YOUR PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS: Property PID: Amount: $ The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 30, 2010. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2011 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2010 to December 31, 2011. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25 percent of the total assessment has been authorized by ordinance. NO FURTHER STATEMENT WILL BE ISSUED APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessor's office. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor's office by November 12, 2010. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL October 1, 2010 Debra A. Mangen City Clerk 18- 028 -24 -14 -0016 WILLIAM C KNAPP ATTN:ACCTNG 4949 WESTOWN PARKWAY #200 WEST DES MOINES, IA 50266 18- 028 -24 -14 -0118 OMG PROPERTIES LLC 4930 FRANCE AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 18- 028 -24-41 -0383 5000 FRANCE COMPANY 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 18- 028 -24 -14 -0026 3930 BUILDING LLC c/o JAMES W. NELSON 7790 LOCHMERE TERR EDINA, MN 55439 18- 028 -24 -14 -0021 FRANCE AVE PROPERTIES c/o K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 18- 028 -24 -14 -0121 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 18- 028 -24 -41 -0049 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24 -41 -0181 CITY OF EDINA 4801 50TH ST W EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24 -14 -0129 FRANK HOLDINGS LLC 5223 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD EDINA, MN 55439 18- 028 -24-41 -0055 FRANCE AT 50TH LLC 7800 METRO PKWY, STE. 300 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 18- 028 -24-41 -0237 EXCEL BANK OF EDINA P.O. BOX 1509 MINNEAPOLIS; MN 55480 18- 028 -24 -14 -0035 SOON YONG PARK/JUNG JA PARK 5275 GRANDVIEW SQ. #3308 EDINA, MN 55436 18- 028 -24 -14 -0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24 -14 -0122 PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION CO. 3922 50TH ST W EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24 -41 -0052 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 18- 028 -24-41 -0182 A K LARSON FAMILY LLC 3939 50TH ST W #200 EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24 -14 -0020 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIPS C/O K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 18- 028 -24 -41 -0066 5036 FRANCE AVE S LTD. PTNRSP. 5036 FRANCE AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 18- 028 -24 -14 -0024 49.5 LLC C/O JOHN GROSS 4520 ARDEN AVE EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24 -14 -0108 1905 PARTNERSHIP LLP C/O KLEINMAN REALTY CO 5301 EAST RIVER RD, #101 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 18- 028 -24 -14 -0046 FIRST BUILDING CORP. c/o US BANK N.A. 2800 E. LAKE ST. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 18- 028 -24 -14 -0126 L.A. REAL ESTATE GROUP ETAL 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA, MN 55424 18- 028 -24-41 -0178 LUND REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA, MN 55424 o e t7 1869 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.B. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action F] Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing - Certification of Delinquent Utilities ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2010 -103. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Minnesota Statute 444.075 allows Cities to "charge a charge against the owner, lessee, occupant or all of them and may provide and covenant for certifying unpaid charges to the county auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes are collected ". City of Edina code sections 1100.05, 1110.05 and 716.03 allows for the certification of water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and recycling delinquent accounts. The City of Edina has certified unpaid utility bills to the county for collection for many years. Hennepin County requires council resolution prior to certification. Utility accounts (water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling) with balances over $50 and delinquent one month or longer were notified in writing of the pending certification and the time and date of the hearing in a letter dated September 17. A $30 administrative fee is added to delinquent accounts to cover the additional costs associated with the certification process. As with the special assessments, certified amounts would also include an interest rate of 6.5 %. The actual numbers of accounts and amounts certified to the county will be less than the amounts indicated here as customers will continue to have the opportunity to pay the overdue balances up until November 19, leaving one week to detect NSF checks. The delinquent utility list is a list of properties in Edina that remain on the certification list as of Thursday, October 14. In September, 704 properties were sent notices for a total of $503,530.02. Last year, notices were sent to 721 properties totaling $505,803.11 with the final certification of 365 properties for $365,239.09. In 2008 644 properties received_ notices totaling $344,037.29 with 357 properties being certified for $210,269.23. The City has received a list of 3 properties that receive St. Louis Park utility services but are located in Edina and pursuant to agreement between the City of Edina and the City of St. Louis Park, these 3 properties are also included in the delinquent list to be certified by the City of Edina. To respect the privacy of delinquent customers, the attached list omits the names and addresses. The detailed list of properties and delinquent amounts to be certified is available in the Clerk's Office and the Finance Department. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -103 Delinquent Utility List RESOLUTION NO. 2010-103 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR WHEREAS, the Edina City Council duly adopted - Ordinances No. 1100.05 1110.05, and 716.03 providing for the certification of delinquent utility charges (water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling) to the County Auditor for collection pursuant to the provision of MN Statute 444.075. WHEREAS, the Finance Department has prepared a list of delinquent utility charges togeth er with the legal description of the premises served, the official copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and attached to this resolution. WHEREAS, all parties have been notified by mail of the certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate copy of this resolution and the list of delinquent accounts to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the County, and such delinquent accounts shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes with interest from the date of this resolution at the rate of 6.5 percent (6.5 %) per annum and including a $30.00 administrative penalty pursuant to the provisions of MN Statute 444.075. The description of the certification is: NAME OF CERTIFICATION INSTALLMENTS Delinquent Utilities DU -10 Levy No. 17707 1 Year Passed and adopted by the City Council on October 19, 2010. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk Customer # f 58 L 09 00115462 00076011 00112957 00095326 00112319 00113325 00101939 00090948 00106234 00113778 00111720 00112763 00076215 00111723 00104496 00097911 00114152 00114760 00098725 00076379 00111726 00076480 00107474 00109837 Or - ^236 ;65 OUu79160 00090566 00106715 00076660 00076685 00109797 00076795 00112743 00093658 00095591 00076831 00113327 00076915 00085119 00111348 00102926 00077046 00112511 00113457 00107113 00107872 00077141 00077164 00077188 00 ^07697 370 L, _/530 00077209 00099719 00077234 Account # Tax Roll Number 0110053003 1902824110055 0110072000 1902824140045 0110073009 1902824140046 0110118006 1902824140006 0110165008 1902824410029 0110181008 1902824440047 0110190007 1902824440032 0110243004 1902824410050 0110252002 1902824440058 0110301003 2002824330101 0110311001 2002824320109 0110331007 2002824230017 0110347009 2002824230059 0110363008 2002824320136 0110386001 2002824330008 0110398016 2002824320089 0110405008 2002824320075 0110423006 2002824230120 0110426003 2002824230106 0110490004 2002824320058 0110497007 2002824230038 0110577000 2002824330031 0110592001 2002824320019 0110682002 2002824310111 0110688006 2002824310084 0110698004 2002824310093 0110794007 2002824340111 0110834009 2002824310062 0110851007 2002824240079 0110858000 2002824240139 0110860006 2002824240141 0110864002 2002824210132 0110890000 2002824310052 0111001004 2002824340029 0111016007 2002824310033 0111023008 2002824310026 0111036003 2002824240028 0111038001 2002824240051 0111064008 2002824210034 0111115007 2002824310022 0111163008 2002824310170 0111219011 2002824210016 0111250002 2002824210028 0111342002 2002824220004 0111346008 2002824220039 0111385000 2002824220028 0111385019 2002824220028 0111410009 1902824110008 0111414005 1902824110109 0111510017 2002824330053 0111533001 2002824330068 0111622003 2002824340011 0111635008 2002824340064 0111640001 2002824340036 0111647004, 2002824340042 0111649002 2002824340066 0111665001 2902824220046 0111736006 2902824220052 CITY OF EDINA DELINQUENT UTILITY LIST Certification Balance $371.45 $793.91 $419.55 $122.57 $994.96 $443.50 $308.86 $144.88 $515.83 $60.63 $445.86 $528.70 $607.90 $682.16 $205.94 $524.13 $108.59 $457.74 $751.35 $215.37 $761.23 $596.91 $538.28 $398.85 $608.35 $358.28 $81.36 $679.00 $860.45 $595.10 $437.41 $781.54 $133.92 $351.91 $668.72 $461.49 $549.58 $115.04 $356.43 $146.90 $503.84 $228.83 $228.83 $580.61 $2,669.37 $305.36 $133.32 $459.88 $1,146.27 $195.05 $507.61 $274.43 $715.52 $109.76 $1,136.25 $499.36 $576.96 $773.20 Customer # 00111750 00114565 00113537 00077279 00111752 00081730 00077307 00114287 00115098 00110100 00102844 00111763 00109527 00077591 00083286 00077643 00109261 00077657 00077671 00114750 00077686 00077703 00077730 00113882 00091190 00077779 00077797 00111767 00114339 00114509 00077896 00101942 00107478 00097302 00077941 00077969 00077970 00103773 00114103 00114425 00110117 00111771 00109667 00091886 00078143 00078146 00078149 00104590 00092797 00092805 00113859 00103350 00110909 00078353 00101295 00104705 00105478 00091188 Account # Tax Roll Number 0111746004 2902824220013 0111765000 2002824330105 0111767008 2002824330112 0111855001 2902824220022 0111860004 2902824220051 0111862002 2902824220065 0112004367 2902824210011 0112010001 2902824210461 0113655009 3202824310013 0113661001 3202824310019 0120044004 1902824440021 0120050005 1902824430108 0120088001 1902824420004 0120151003 1902824430105 0120179001 1902824420024 0120225005 1902824430068 0120231007 1902824430074 0120237001 1902824430079 0120250003 1902824430024 0120255008 1902824430029 0120266005 1902824420119 0120286001 1902824420059 0120313008 1902824430053 0120330007 1902824430065 0120346009 1902824420090 0120368002 1902824310003 0120387009 1902824310160 0120397007 1902824340044 0120439007 1902824310130 0120496007 1902824310037 0120497006 1902824310038 0120515004 1902824310056 0120518001 1902824310113 0120521006 1902824310116 0120547006 3002824210064 0120576000 1902824340057 0120577009 1902824340056 0120611007 1902824310079 0120614004 1902824310092 0120614004 1902824310092 0120656003 1902824310105 0120663004 1902824310081 0120714003 3002824210052 0120715002 3002824210053 0120768008 3002824220005 0120771003 3002824220011 0120774000 3002824220042 0120832000 3002824230075 0120845005 3002824220015 0120905002 3002824220049 0120995003 1902824330037 0121021009 3002824230029 0121106025 3002824230034 0121218002 3002824210082 0121252009 3002824210080 0121275002 3002824210031 0150749009 0611621140049 0151100000 0511621310088 Certification Balance $914.64 $230.02 $192.54 $337.54 $643.62 $534.70 $35,685.65 $325.86 $74.93 $74.12 $302.33 $395.76 $1,010.01 $869.93 $654.68 $320.37 $107.43 $394.17 $392.44 $184.25 $110.92 $661.54 $592.71 $511.37 $119.55 $623.33 $378.35 $341.90 $106.26 $95.77 $237.83 $651.15 $237.31 $223.21 $260.13 $841.41 $501.00 $244.55 $70.87 $123.93 $107.43 $495.33 $448.46 $393.69 $430.20 $118.06 $907.21 $200.00 $946.33 $902.93 $912.73 $76.48 $245.08 $112.78 $457.65 $132.12 $991.31 $476.21 Customer # 00101943 00106012 00078682 00078692 00096921 00078780 00112116 00078930 00078935 00078972 00078993 00097027 00095391 00079114 00079144 00097960 00107485 00106580 00109831 00114577 00079282 00113704 00079576 00107316 00079589 00103822 00107358 00103350 00079910 00112118 00111799 00112147 00111797 00113671 00110663 00113462 00114700 00112311 00109422 00092648 00077916 00080091 00113506 00106200 00114968 00114473 00105018 00106524 00080181 00104616 00102908 00080539 00111818 00093553 00080650 00080676 00107152 00114808 Account # Tax Roll Number 0151617006 0511621140002 0152640005 0511621130008 0152646009 0511621130014 0152657005 0511621130022 0152701001 0511621420012 0152770007 0511621310056 0153071001 0511621430008 0153419002 0511621430026 0153425004 0511621430010 0153463007 0511621340062 0153488008 0511621330048 0153701018 0611621440044 0153718000 0711621110005 0153722004 0711621120030 0153750009 0711621110033 0153752043 0711621110070 0153752061 0711621110041 0153787006 0711621120013 0153790001 0711621120016 0153829015 0711621120070 0153854004 0711621210003 0157556006 0511621430067 0158007009 0811621240080 0158008115 0811621210030 0158008133 0811621210027 0158054001 0811621230002 0158056009 0811621230058 0158065008 0811621230050 0159090498 0811621340023 0159091095 0811621330135 0160326009 3111721310031 0160327008 3111721310030 0160328007 3111721310029 0160560013 3011721320047 0160561076 3011721330020 0160561165 3011721330066 0160561192 3011721330005 0160561192 3011721330005 0160561290 3011721330052 0160561316 3011721330074 0160561432 3111721220011 0160561450 3111721220009 0160561496 3011721330023 0160561646 3011721330021 0160561744 3011721330020 0160561744 3011721330020 0160562958 3111721220058 0160623009 3111721210022 0160647154 3111721240013 0160771394 3111721130017 0160862900 3111721440047 0161063004 3111721420026 0161119008 3111721430030 0161226008 3111721310023 0161237005 3111721340019 0161262003 3111721340025 0161266009 0611621220036 0161300070 3111721340040 CITY OF EDINA DELINQUENT UTILITY LIST Certification Balance $506.91 $973.49 $134.60 $373.83 $217.90 $585.71 $449.40 $506.50 $438.54 $272.69 $816.46 $337.08 $455.22 $1,278.11 $991.12 $399.51 $449.76 $615.32 $222.56 $711.47 $111.34 $476.82 $339.27 $415.37 $953.73 $1,199.79 $536.06 $268.62 $303.50 $870.65 $924.72 $695.42 $838:52 $2,460.24 $727.48 $658.77 $319.97 $399.36 $468.07 $226.76 $122.65 $124.51 $620.81 $641.27 $66.60 $257.05 $92.60 $283.93 $1,736.04 $57.05 $224.93 $212.60 $150.19 $647.00 $585.40 $772.44 $90.98 $74.16 Customer # 00114950 00110248 00114130 00109417 00080855 00080877 00095066 00111826 00111827 00113303 00077151 00104148 00090214 00105148 00101791 00115030 00111833 00114851 00081264 00093431 00092020 00081325 00081352 00113355 00108175 00111984 00081394 00111977 00081529 00102954 00104555 00099165 00077113 00103350 00113192 00112143 00082366 00108115 00096900 00100549 00111598 00112573 00101037 00103969 00082730 00082774 00101699 00094198 00082900 00103968 00082902 00111664 00106401 00083074 00111665 00099662 00083080 00083114 Account # Tax Roll Number 0161964004 3211721220066 0161987007 3211721230039 0162399007 3211721230012 0162434004 3211721230045 0162440006 3211721230051 0162500138 0611621210023 0162549104 0611621210071 0162549248 0611621210090 0162549505 0611621210112 0163222008 0611621230058 0163227003 0611621230014 0163228002 0611621230059 0163230026 0611621230018 0163230035 0611621230018 0163447007 0611621340057 0163449005 0611621340053 0165008183 0611621340035 0165008236 0611621340009 0165016227 0611621320005 0165040003 0611621320057 0165056004 0611621330013 0165061007 0611621330023 0165087007 0711621210014 0167001006 0711621220036 0167001015 0711621220036 0167004021 0711621220028 0167007000 0611621330053 0167009008 0611621330042 0200048000 1802824120034 0200145002 1802824120074 0200183005 1802824130067 0200233005 1802824130018 0200427001 1802824210051 0200538007 1802824220047 0200658001 1802824230046 0200916009 1802824440036 0200991007 1802824410171 0200993005 1802824410124 0201100003 1902824120129 0201150002 1902824120139 0201232004 1802824430053 0201246008 1902824120068 0201269000 1902824130007 0201329008 1902824120076 0201362024 1802824440106 0201409001 1802824420013 0201419009 1802824420023 0201475019 1802824110003 0201545006 1802824140014 0201546005 1802824140041 0201547004 1802824140042 0201548012 1802824140043 0201580011 1802824140006 0201659008 1802824440082 0202043001 1902824210063 0202055006 1902824210001 0202109002 1902824210048 0202153007 1902824240128 Certification Balance $301.44 $569.03 $251.98 $1,002.89 $502.59 $671.65 $499.61 $178.72 $798.27 $411.66 $1,385.79 $210.11 $435.13 $173.18 $192.95 $111.58 $1,048.50 $164.24 $717.11 $1,631.29 $105.09 $812.97 $389.43 $1,181.19 $196.14 $289.41 $1,250.78 $375.16 $742.85 $1,146.92 $615.57 $548.88 $588.23 $260.26 $1,581.49 $233.14 $492.54 $125.24 $289.45 $190.21 $708.52 $463.41 $881.50 $162.22 $268.86 $767.33 $1,097.04 $108.15 $213.58 $241.39 $554.22 $439.84 $108.15 $74.12 $1,118.32 $184.49 $425.90 $149.87 Cuc•nmer # f 23 0, 678 00110382 00104325 00111668 00102148 00106180 00114525 00090879 00097987 00083385 00111671 00101146 00113540 00083425 00095650 00115558 00113323 00105016 00112287 00113427 00083548 00097848 00106217 00110741 00113553 '9523 3017 00102732 00102969 00104640 00114648 00109841 00083823 00096202 00111689 00108114 00088119 00113448 00083971 00102695 00106980 00083988 00107387 00110922 00084030 00114409 00104323 00104550 00094625 00114667 00100576 '111151 14778 uJ112883 00108198 00097149 00100811 Account # Tax Roll Number 0202188006 1902824240065 0202194008 1902824240052 0202218000 1902824240093 0202249003 1902824240024 0202259000 1902824240029 0202279006 1902824320011 0202281002 1902824320010 0202281039 1902824320043 0202298003 1902824320029 0202312005 1902824230044 0202683006 2811721220012 0202755009 2811721210049 0202763009 2811721210200 0202767005 2811721210052 0202775005 2811721210037 0202777067 2811721210019 0202802002 2811721240111 0202828002 2811721240094 0202846028 2811721310036 0202855008 2811721240078 0202917004 2811721240035 0202954008 2811721230111 0202992002 2811721230009 0203186051 2811721310060 0203206002 2811721320009 0203211005 2811721320004 0203219007 2811721320165 0203245005 2811721320152 0203307000 2811721320132 0203325008 2811721320057 0203332009 2811721320066 0203375007 2811721320073 0203399009 2811721320085 0203400006 2811721320086 0203517024 3311721220006 0203532007 3311721220088 0203555009 3311721220036 0203603001 3311721220074 0203612000 3311721220076 0203727002 3311721210074 0203728001 3311721210054 0203733004 3311721210059 0203750002 3311721210067 0203761009 3311721220065 0203769001 3311721210110 0203795009 3311721210086 0203818002 3311721210009 0203827001 3311721210028 0203877000 3311721240063 0203897006 3311721240021 0210000012 1802824140122 0290029004 0702824430136 0290053003 0702824430092 0290093005 0702824430011 0290094004 0702824430142 0290149009 0702824430077 0290181062 0702824140032 0290182070 0702824410007 CITY OF EDINA DELINQUENT UTILITY LIST Certification Balance $57.41 $496.33 $311.21 $600.33 $577.17 $270.48 $696.22 $209.68 $415.70 $97.87 $440.55 $467.34 $552.92 $947.97 $111.37 $301.25 $495.93 $489.61 $674.90 $109.66 $672.60 $635.29 $617.23 $145.68 $382.60 $602.44 $846.81 $286.27 $691.81 $197.16 $443.83 $103.42 $124.58 $70.63 $2,762.41 $392.30 $1,038.61 $96.76 $1,207.40 $160.84 $146.99 $786.92 $317.93 $528.25 $520.77 $506.50 $262.98 $326.02 $1,205.29 $203.33 $138.68 $828.91 $134.16 $79.42 $54.86 $732.59 $181.83 $390.64 Customer # 00112624 00105283 00111698 00097948 00084525 00084533 00112506 00084608 00084624 00084642 00084648 00101244 00110856 00084720 00084723 00084753 00084758 00084768 00095112 00099401 00084918 00098873 00106825 00104071 00085041 00112898 00094241 00105719 00114563 00111384 00112183 00085225 00104678 00085238 00103350 00114125 00085310 00085412 00109411 00098217 00105792 00085604 00113345 00085686 00111896 00085695 00093615 00109042 00104014 00085807 00107926 00111190 00105040 00112569 00112338 00110497 00114640 00107451 Account # Tax Roll Number 0290182089 0702824410008 0290183113 0702824410134 0290270000 0702824410113 0290369002 0702824420084 0290388009 0702824440115 0290396009 0702824440120 0290439008 0702824440037 0290463007 0702824440048 0290480006 0702824440024 0290497016 0702824440116 0290506006 0702824440134 0290529009 0702824130129 0290545009 0702824130105 0290572005 0702824130014 0290575002 0702824130136 0290601000 0702824130043 0290607004 0702824130037 0290615004 0702824130007 0290645008 0702824130080 0304013001 3311721310062 0304103011 3311721240013 0304207025 3311721320005 0304210002 3311721310037 0304220000 3311721310051 0304222008 3311721310049 0304228002 3311721310055 0304233005 3311721310005 0304237001 3311721310001 0304249007 3311721310014 0304282005 3311721320058 0304469000 2911721420026 0304563005 2911721440052 0304573003 3211721110018 0304577009 3211721110014 0304609001 3211721120029 0304632002 3211721120056 0304706003 2911721430009 0304857000 2911721340012 0304873000 2911721340042 0305043002 2911721140038 0305068002 2911721140008 0305129009 2911721310004 0305358001 3011721110044 0305378007 3011721110032 0305383000 3011721110026 0305387006 3011721110030 0305398003 3011721120053 0305489003 3011721120097 0305519007 3011721210023 0305526008 3011721210030 0305532000 3011721210036 0305533009 3011721210037 0305555002 3011721210165 0305563002 3011721210042 0305573000 3011721210052 0305602005 3011721210112 0305672000 3011721220132 0305676006 3011721220135 Certification Balance $433.43 $123.99 $537.49 $390.97 $199.08 $926.17 $239.92 $457.79 $431.90 $123.57 $1,402.96 $104.67 $140.34 $366.08 $1,091.58 $294.46 $424.63 $543.09 $217.76 $711.84 $159.86 $652.95 $645.62 $185.27 $820.95 $195.42 $487.19 $458.63 $720.09 $174.52 $530.72 $155.31 $60.50 $346.85 $269.47 $764.36 $971.90 $318.12 $589.17 $1,056.47 $607.20 $551.66 $262.75 $570.51 $547.45 $665.76 $504.00 $432.25 $756.17 $116.20 $391.58 $181.06 $246.08 $202.83 $461.04 $193.51 $212.81 $334.97 Customer # 00102684 00085940 00085966 00114098 00099460 00112531 00096679 00114526 00114526 00084768 00112628 00112550 00102457 00098125 00090991 00114970 00114997 00100347 00113352 00107811 00103350 00086576 00109831 00086610 00095138 00107385 00111119 00103350 00113481 00111909 00086822 00086874 00115257 00086936 00112485 00108454 00086994 00108491 00108561 00104076 00111241 00103350 00103350 00103350 00087379 00093823 00105598 00103350 00109212 00111925 00103350 00087613 00113367 00092776 00087681 00109187 00106084 00111927 Account # Tax Roll Number 0305684006 3011721220142 0305701005 3011721220015 0305729003 3011721220122 0305769004 3011721220098 0305771000 3011721220100 0305782007 3011721220110 0305789000 3011721220048 0305821000 3011721220083 0305822009 3011721220083 0305826005 3011721220086 0305830009 3011721220090 0305962009 3011721130050 0306528004 3211721220036 0306706008 3011721420021 0306717005 3011721430019 0307503001 3111721230004 0307506008 3111721230037 0307539009 3111721230067 0330091001 3002824110054 0330124002 3002824110080 0330129007 3002824110005 0330132002 3002824110036 0330186007 3002824110053 0330193017 3002824110076 0330214003 3002824110034 0330303005 3002824120074 0330386005 3002824120012 0330730008 3002824410039 0330739009 3002824410030 0330760001 3002824440041 0330774005 3002824440038 0330828001 3002824410024 0330874004 3002824430097 0330916004 3002824430073 0330945009 3002824420020 0330969000 3002824340011 0330978009 3002824340048 0331012005 3002824340029 0331013004 3002824340030 0331059009 3002824310030 0331120004 3002824320089 0331215000 3002824330054 0331367006 3002824330020 0331724004 3102824110051 0331734002 3102824120019 0331752009 3102824120040 0331805006 3102824130062 0331820007 3102824420009 0331915003 3102824210083 0332113001 3102824210037 0332120002 3102824210033 0332131009 3102824210022 0332174007 3102824130065 0332175006 3102824130064 0332197000 3102824240006 0332205000 3102824240015 0332221000 3102824240090 0332286002 3102824240061 CITY OF EDINA DELINQUENT UTILITY LIST Certification Balance $409.69 $483.85 $375.89 $150.36 $614.34 $462.34 $2,145.55 $87.50 $87.50 $448.63 $321.85 $758.18 $145.02 $415.15 $1,195.13 $102.04 $476.62 $476.64 $390.76 $122.72 $315.03 $998.93 $178.26 $1,187.61 $977.58 $341.94 $320.10 $227.81 $120.51 $593.86 $463.70 $721.86 $386.63 $655.33 $314.13 $541.14 $198.19 $1,650.80 $4,537.91 $581.29 $232.87 $269.47 $269.47 $269.47 $936.98 $98.10 $579.25 $269.47 $618.51 $217.83 $436.16 $350.69 $805.58 $651.19 $619.92 $1,013.79 $195.03 $1,145.69 Customer # 00107330 00093397 00097653 00087968 00106658 00108727 00111935 00083399 00105623 00110566 00088220 00095924 00114912 00103350 00113573 00088351 00114496 00104202 00102384 00103445 00105681 00104506 00088443 00106600 00094922 00113658 00104959 00088700 00099063 00111553 00085339 00104487 00114176 00104521 00088907 00100338 00101350 00106460 00113787 00094026 00112752 00113967 00097900 00098747 00105917 00114925 00089415 00089455 00089482 00103350 00089524 00109608 00112560 00079710 00109739 00089694 00114954 00106602 Account # Tax Roll Number 0332638007 3102824320016 0332643019 3102824320038 0332643082 3102824330022 0332781002 3102824230019 0335036026 3102824430004 0335038006 3102824430005 0340081155 3311721340120 0340123002 3311721340075 0340194006 3311721330074 0340204004 3311721340031 0340209009 3311721340021 0340336005 3311721330085 0340433007 0411621240058 0340433007 0411621240058 0340443005 0411621240065 0340450005 0411621240092 0340464009 0411621240005 0340521000 0411621240010 0340529002 0411621240097 0340555009 0411621240030 0340563009 0411621210024 0340604000 0411621210069 0340617005 0411621240039 0340624006 0411621240072 0340697008 0411621230039 0340840004 0411621220078 0341111004 0511621410004 0341134007 0511621410059 0341135006 0411621320082 0341165009 0411621320071 0341319004 0411621330025 0341386002 0911621220001 0341414008 0911621220020 0341424006 0911621210009 0341432006 0911621220005 0341639007 3211721140029 0341809010 3211721240038 0341905004 3211721410038 0341944007 3211721440008 0341955003 0511621110076 0341972002 0511621110063 0341996004 0511621110085 0342001005 0511621110060 0342041007 3211721440040 0342087002 0511621120026 0342129002 3211721430021 0342227003 3211721410004 0342291004 3211721410027 0342354008 3211721420041 0342358004 3211721420045 0342418002 3211721310014 0342545008 3211721340072 0342550297 0511621220032 0342552133 0511621220080 0342600046 0511621140052 0342601009 0511621140054 0342625001 0511621110029 0342640002 0511621110015 Certification Balance $193.32 $530.58 $672.62 $568.98 $1,687.33 $9,959.70 $938.20 $515.00 $243.09 $295.06 $204.83 $1,024.51 $143.42 $180.51 $99.08 $105.09 $221.70 $391.99 $520.80 $427.46 $651.29 $696.36 $310.15 $395.36 $1,021.78 $439.78 $597.54 $707.30 $902.26 $501.85 $839.31 $91.11 $96.47 $381.78 $67.54 $490.30 $174.55 $327.54 $643.30 $438.15 $436.38 $335.29 $297.34 $514.70 $721.92 $366.14 $425.37 $223.78 $813.15 $269.47 $573.07 $812.50 $492.90 $697.84 $1,297.28 $1,775.83 $88.15 $448.12 CITY OF EDINA DELINQUENT UTILITY LIST Customer # Account # Tax Roll Number Certification Balance 578 0342655004 0511621110042 $819.46 184 0342663004 0511621110036 $509.89 00105742 0343042004 3211721320042 $466.06 00095619 0343505013 0811621110009 $122,160.49 00106399 0345017019 0911621310012 $2,742.41 00102492 0345017028 0911621310012 $85.66 00090021 0345070120 0811621430006 $999.81 00111491 0345900000 0811621330151 $467.00 $249,281.19 TOTAL DELINQUENT UTILITIES 10 /14/2010 $425,038.51 PAID SINCE CERTIFICATION LETTERS SENT '$78,491.51 TOTAL CERTIFICATION LETTERS SENT $503,530.02 Customer # Account # Tax Roll Number Certification Balance 00106658 0350003006 3102824430004 $2,040.00 00106664 0350006603 3102824340008 $5,630.82 00106662 0350010007 3102824340007 $5,672.47 00111053 0350017000 3102824330015 $912.90 00106658 6350025690 3102824430002 $1,967.45 00106658 0350025695 3102824430001 $1,957.67 00106658 0350025700 3102824340009 $2,104.48 $175,106.59 ST LOUIS PARK DLEINQUENT UTILITIES WITH EDINA ADDRESS 00048049 0023482003 2811721210003 $195.81. 00016099 0023566003 2811721210019 $213.87 00039658 0022388508 1802824210014 $241.05 $650.73 otle Zf � REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.C. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing Final Development Plan, Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy, 6905 York Avenue — Resolution No. 2010 -104 ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the amended Final Development Plan, per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting Final Development Plan approval to build a 14,492 square foot retail store with drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 29, 2010, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the amended Final Development Plan subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the staff report dated September 29, 2010. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2010 -104 • Planning Commission Staff Report, September 29, 2010 • Minutes from the September 29, 2010 Edina Planning Commission meeting. • Proposed Plans L RESOLUTION NO. 2010-104 APPROVING A REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 6905 YORK AVENUE FOR CVS PHARMACY City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. lmeir com anies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy are requesting an amended Final 1.01. Ve P Development Plan review at 6905 York Avenue . are foot retail store with a drive - through 1.02 The applicant is proposing to build a 14,492 squ facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. from 35 feet to 20 feet from 1.03 In 2008, a Final Development plan tlie re f buildisetback d from 20 feet to 5 feeder previous plan York Avenue and 69th Street lot were granted. The two retail buildings totaled 18,000 square feet in size• that has been appr oval also included a 114 -unit, four story apartment blare for on a the 2SOr the retail portion, constructed as phase 1 of the site project. The proposed osed to be amended, is generally consistent with the previous Plan with two is now p ro p exceptions: ro ose totaling d plan calls for one 14,492 square foot building, rather than two buildings a. Thep 18,000 square feet. ro osed plan calls for a drive - through facility. f con lion of approval of the b Thep p p rohibited drive - through previous plan specifically p 1.04 The variances are still valid, and the proposed plans are consistent with the previously approved variances . acili is a permitted use within the PCD -3 Zoning District, in which this 1.05 A drive- throug h f tY property is located. 10 ortation Commission and recommended approval of the traffic 1.05 On May 20, 2010, the Transp study. 201 0 the Plannin g to attempt to address Commission reviewed and continue concerns. on the amended 1.06 On May 26, Final Development Plan for the applicant approval of the On September. 29, 201tYie Planning Commission unanimously recommended pp 1.07 I? amended Final Development Plan. _n 2, FINDINGS - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN an. _. STREET www.cityofed i na.COM OTA, 55424 -1394 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952- 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-104 Page Two 2.02 Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the amended Final Development Plan at 6905 York Avenue. Approval of the amended Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped September 15, 2010. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Submit a copy of the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated September 24, 2010. Execution of a proof -of- parking agreement. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on , 2010. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-104 Page Two ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010 City Clerk DRAFT PC MINUTES SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 2008.0004.10a Final Development Plan Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy 6905 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission this item was continued by the Planning Commission at the May 26, 2010 meeting. Primary concern of the Planning Commission was in regard to the site plan, drive through, pedestrian and automobile circulation. Teague said the applicant has revised the plans to attempt to address those concerns. Planner Teague explained that Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 14,492 square foot retail store with a drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. In 2008, a Final Development Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the retail building, and from 20 feet to 5 feet for the parking lot were granted. The two retail buildings totaled 18,000 square feet in size. The previous plan approval also included a 114 -unit, four story apartment building on the site, that has been constructed as phase 1 of the site project. The proposed plan for phase 2, or the retail portion, is now proposed to be amended, is generally consistent with the previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls for one 14,492 square foot building, rather than two buildings totalling 18,000 square feet. 2. The proposed plan calls for a drive - through facility. A condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive - through facilities. The request now before the Planning Commission is for a revised Final Development Plan. The Planning Commission previously considered the variances as part of the review in May. It was thought at that time that the variances needed to be reconsidered because the site plan had expired. However, because the apartment complex was built in 2009, the site plan and variances have not expired. The variances are still valid, and the proposed plans are consistent with the previously approved variances. As noted on the approving resolution, the variances are conditioned upon approval of the Final Development Plan. Therefore, a revised Final Development Plan is the only request. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan at 6905 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy based on the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Approval of the Final Development Plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 15, 2010. Building elevations date stamped September 15, 2010. 2) Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5) Submit a copy of the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6) Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7) Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated September 24, 2010. 8) Execution of a proof -of- parking agreement. Appearing for the Applicant Gordon Johnson, Thomsen Nybeck, Kevin McGee and Mike Spack Applicant Presentation Mr. Johnson addressed the Commission and informed them CVS representatives worked with planning staff and came up with a revised viable workable plan. Johnson said in his opinion the revised plan illustrating one building instead of two (as originally approved) is a less extensive use of the property. Concluding, Johnson asked Commissioners for their support; noting CVS has no objection to the eight conditions of approval as recommended by planning staff. Johnson noted that the following two issues are important for the project to be successful: 1. Request lifting the restriction of drive - through for this site. Noting drive - through facilities are a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district; and without a drive - through this project would not be able to proceed. 2. Request approval of a Proof of Parking Agreement for three (3) parking stalls. City ordinance requires 89 parking stalls and the proposed plan provides 86 stalls. Mr. McGee presented to the Commission a "fly -by" of the proposed CVS Pharmacy. McGee concluded his presentation and stood for questions. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked if the proposed building continues to have a second entrance. Mr. McGee responded in the affirmative and with graphics pointed out the primary, secondary entrances and drive - through. Commissioner Risser questioned if the revision to the plans would result in less traffic on West 69th Street. Mr. McGee responded from past comments by Commissioner Brown the internal circulation of the site was revised to eliminate drive aisles from coming together at one point. Sidewalks were also added creating connections from all four sides of the site. McGee said the revised plan was presented to the Transportation Commission where it received approval. McGee introduced Mr. Spack to further speak to traffic flow. Mr. Spack said in his opinion traffic would be the same, adding the traffic analysis previously submitted was accurate. He also noted that the York Avenue/West 69th Street intersection is under Hennepin County jurisdiction; however, at this time this intersection is not a priority. Concluding that CVS will continue to work with Hennepin County on any future changes to this intersection. Chair Fischer asked Mr. McGee to clarify the crosswalk. Mr. McGee explained that the crosswalk was raised and stamped providing better definition and pedestrian safety. Commissioner Brown questioned the recommendation of no truck traffic on West 70th Street and if that condition in practicality can be enforced. Planner Teague agreed that condition would be difficult to monitor and would be enforced on a complaint basis. Teague said a similar condition was placed on the Super Target. Public Hearing- Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion /Motion Chair Fischer asked Roger Knutson, City Attorney if he was confortable that the variances granted in 2008 for the previous project still stand. Mr. Knutson responded that the variances previously granted stand. Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Final Development Approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Staunton complimented the applicant on their revised plans and asked if condition #2 ensures that "what we see is what we get ". Mr. McGee said the fly -by represented the landscape plan, adding condition #2 would be met. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Fischer acknowledged that he and Commissioner Schroeder met with the applicant to discuss creating a pedestrian friendly environment. o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 29, 2010 2008- 004.10a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND This item was continued by the Planning Commission at the May 26, 2010 meeting. (See the attached May 26 staff report; and minutes from the meeting on pages A22 —A28.) Primary concern of the Planning Commission was in regard to the site plan, drive through, pedestrian and automobile circulation. The applicant has revised the plans to attempt to address those concerns. (See attached plans and pages A5 —A10.) Project Description Velmeir Companies on behalf of'CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 14,492 square foot retail store with a drive - through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. (See location on pages Al A4 and the revised narrative and plans on pages A5 —A10.) In 2008, a Final Development Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the retail building, and from 20 feet to 5 feet for the parking lot were granted. The two retail buildings totaled 18,000 square feet in size. The previous plan approval also included a 114- unit, four story apartment building on the site, that has been constructed as phase 1 of the site project. (See previously approved plan for the site on page A11 and the approving resolution on pages Al2 —A14.) The proposed plan for phase 2, or the retail portion, is now proposed- to -be- amended, —is- generally - consistent with -th previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls for one 14,492 square foot building, rather than two buildings totalling 18,000 square feet. 2. The proposed plan calls for a drive- through facility. A condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive- through facilities. (See the approving resolution on pages A22 —A24.) The request now before the Planning Commission is for a revised Final Development Plan. The Planning Commission previously considered the variances as part of the review in May. It was thought at that time that the variances needed to be reconsidered because the site plan had expired. However, because the apartment complex was. built in 2009, the site plan and variances have not expired. The variances are still valid, and the proposed plans are consistent with the previously approved variances. As noted on the approving resolution, the variances, are conditioned upon approval of the Final Development Plan. (See original resolution approving the project and variances on pages Al2- A14.) Therefore, a revised Final Development Plan is the only request. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Key Cadillac; zoned and guided commercial. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Walgreens, Clean N Press Cleaners, Kids Hair and two medical clinics; zoned and guided commercial. Westerly: The Westin hotel, condominiums and parking garage; zoned and guided commercial. Existing Site Features The subject property is 3.7 acres in size and contains a new 114 -unit four story apartment building. The site is relatively flat. (See pages A3 —A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Commercial Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial use. The proposed uses (pharmacy and drive - through window) are permitted within the PCD -3 zoning district, which this property is designated. Therefore, the 2 proposed uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The buildings would be brought up closer to the street than what standard zoning would .allow, to encourage a pedestrian friendly environment along the street. Additional landscaping, benches and pedestrian areas have been added in these areas. Two walkway connections would . be created from the apartment building. A pergola system. is proposed over a portion of the sidewalk within the parking lot. (See page A5.) This is also consistent with principles of the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; A Preliminary Development Plan is only required for a property requested to be rezoned. No rezoning is requested. The plan is generally, consistent with the previously approved Final Development Plan for the site, with the exception of the drive - through facility, which was previously prohibited. (See page A23.) A drive - through facility is a permitted use in PCD -3 zoning district, which this property is zoned. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the previous Final Development Plan to allow a drive - through facility c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract, The single -story retail building with a drive - through would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use; The applicant is proposing a 14,492 square feet of retail, where 18,000 square feet was previously approved. The proposal would increase green space on the site, and meets the floor area ratio requirement; therefore, staff believes the proposal is appropriate for this site. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic report pages The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes study with the attached May 26, 2010 staff report pages on pages A71 —A2.) t) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code, and 3 The proposal conforms with all Zoning Ordinance requirements and to the approved variances on the site. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, . existing structures, open space and. natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and has provided comment on page Al Oa.'All storm water from this site must be treated on -site, as there are no off -site pond expansions available. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance'of a building permit. Parking Based on the square footage, of the building,' 89 parking stalls are required. The site plans show 89 parking stalls, including three stalls that are proposed for proof of parking. Should these stalls be needed in the future, they could be added. A proof -of- parking agreement could be made a condition of approval. Building Design The retail space would be built of brick and large windows. (See pages A4a- A4b.) The entrance to the store has been located to face York Avenue, as was required of the previously proposed retail space. A pergola has been added to break up the mass of the building. An additional false front has been created right at the corner of 69th and York to appear as an entrance to the store. Landscaping The landscape plan has been designed to match the previously approved plan, which was part of an overall plan contemplated for the site. (See pages A7 A8.) Green space and landscaping would be increased from the previous two office buildings with large surface parking lots that'previously existed on e site. (See page . 4 Compliance Table * Variances already approved City Standard Proposed Front — York Avenue 35 feet 20 feet* Side Street— 69th Street 35 feet 20 feet* 83 feet Side — South 0 197 feet Rear = West 0 Building Height 4 stories or 1. stories and 28 feet 50 feet, whichever is less :Floor Area Ratio 100% 96% total both sites 19% subject site Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 15 feet* setback Parking Stalls 89 89 Drive - Through Stacking 5 spaces per bay 5 spaces Over -story Trees 44 required 85 total (number is based on the 25 on the subject site perimeter of the entire development site) * Variances already approved Primary Issues e Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposed uses are permitted in the PCD -3 District. Retail space /drug store and a drive - through window is a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district. With the exception of the canopy, the drive - through would meet all the city's minimum requirements for drive-through's including stacking space, stacking location and setback. 2. The project would encourage an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The main entrance to the building would be off York Avenue, from the existing sidewalk along York. In addition to the existing sidewalks around the perimeter of the site, an east -west sidewalk with a pergola system over a portion of it would be added to connect the apartment building, and provide safer movement through the parking lot. Smaller walkways, pedestrian. areas with benches, and landscaping would be added between the'building and York and 69tH. 3. The retail building has been shifted up to the street in an attempt to screen the parking from the roadway and encourage pedestrian movement. 4. The proposal is consistent with the approved variances for the site, and is consistent with applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. e Would the existing roadways support the project? Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study with the attached May 26, 2010 staff report pages A27 —A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A71— A72.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan at 6905 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy. Approval is based on the following findings: 31 1) The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans., unless modified by the conditions below: • Site-,.plan date stamped September 15, 2010. Grading plan date stamped September 15, 2010. a Landscaping plan date stamped September 15, 2010. Building elevations date stamped September 15, 2010. 2) Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5) Submit a copy of.the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6) Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7) Compliance with the conditions required . by the City Engineer in his memo dated September 24, 2010. 8) Execution of a proof -of- parking agreement. Deadline for a city decision: December 31, 2010 7 RENDERING HME: eR NORR R �I aii rmacy m ftb FROM THE CORNER OF YORK AVENUE AND WEST 69TH 11�0 MVS1 LVA VELMEIR COMPANIES Porinen M DeveMpmenl F- 0 cn W z z H CU E L ¢ M z H D ` W c 00 r-� Ln CD l` 09.13.2010 U / V$ /Pharmacy �• t Q WEST ELEVATION - YORK AVENUE SOUTH M—M m I lilt CVS /Pharmacy a JM- CD UaNU (J'� O � �r� — so- v� 2 w z z H Q Z H 0 w - Oo NIORTH E L EVATI0N - WEST 69TH STREET (16�9679�2j� 00 SC LP Ue^ . Y -o.. / ^Rr�7 c' TO Lfi w �v O Ln EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" . P -0" AA VELMEIR " T COMPANIES Partners In Development As AQ, City of Edina Logund HighlighWdF.m. Hm*v Number LDbtb Street Name L.W. 670D .1 CRY U.1t. ❑ LDho N.M.. 712 El Lk.. zoning VDD-51.� D-1 -0 14P -. Co— D.-) F7 E] c E] MD-1 JPtaael OW.— DW- F7 pab-I jpt.w Q� '. D�- I ................ I .DDy i. Parcels Aj A, PID:2902824340023 3201 69th St W Edina, MN 55435 AQ, 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 2 d. The proposed height and setbacks have not changed from the original plans. However the building is now over 50 tall when measuring from existing grade rather than proposed grade, therefore, the setback requirement increases from 35 feet to 54 feet. e. If the project were built as a traditional strip mall with parking in front of the building, all setbacks would be met. f. The proposal enhances the entrance to the street. g. The variance for the parking setback would provide parking .close to the store front entrances, similar to parallel or on- street parking in front of stores. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan with the requested Variances and. the Conditional Use Permit to allow housing at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. Approval is subject to the following .Conditions:' Approval of the final development plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: o Site plan dated June 9, 2008. Grading plan dated April 28, 2008. © Landscaping plan dated June 9, 2008. - o Building elevations dated April 28, and June 9, 2008 O Roof plan dated June 9, 2008 - 2. The following must be submitted to the City before the City issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval b. Record the resolution with the county. 3. The property owner was responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the, Nine..Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City.may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 5. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. A developer's agreement was required for public water main installation along West 69th Street and Xerxes Avenue, and for the sanitary sewer along West 69th Street. 9. Two surface parking spaces in front of the apartments must be eliminated to meet the required parking space setback from West 69th Street. 10.. Bike storage must be provided to meet City Code. 11. No drive - through window access allowed for the retail buildings. 12. Fifty percent (50 %) of the retail users in the building that faces York Avenue must have doors that have public access openings to the street. A13 RESOLUTION BOO. 2005 -55 Uq�!�21 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES AND °( A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 3110'9 -3201 WEST SST" STREET �t�5 City Of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1.' BACKGROUND. 1.01 DJR Architects on behalf of Tom Miller are is requesting a Final Development Plan with Variances and a Conditional Use; Permit to tear down the existing two, office_ buildings on these sites and build two buildings containing retail space that would total 18,000 square feet, and a 114 -unit, 4 -story apartment building at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. 1.02 The following Variances are requested: 1. Retail building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street. 2. Apartment building setback variances from 54 feet to 35 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street. 3. A parking lot setback variance from 20 to 5 feet. m 50 feet to 54 feet for the apartments. 4. A building height variance from 1.03 On May 28, 2008, the Planning Commission (4 -3 -1) recommended approval of the requests. 1.04 On June 5, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variance. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2. The proposal would -meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed.use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground ' eae uses that crp^te an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail. uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian connections. c. The building height and setback variances. for the apartments are now required because of the recent Zoning Ordinance .mendment that now requires the building height to be measured from existing grade. 1 952 - 927 -8861 City: Hall �ra FAX 952- 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 70379 www.cit ofedina. con mm I G-,CIIEp F Larldn IEIOA TE Miller 0... I.p.-t, LLC F-91 L.L-.)HJ.K.-.. SW mm I G-,CIIEp F Larldn IEIOA TE Miller 0... I.p.-t, LLC F-91 L.L-.)HJ.K.-.. NN° e N ° MEMORANDUM - Plan Review HBO �3 �y •- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: September 24, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed CVS Pharmacy West 691" Street and York Avenue South Engineering has re- reviewed plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and minutes. • A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. Sheet — C4 -1 Utility Plan: 1. Indicate "Private" on all internal utilities such as the sanitary sewer lines, watermain lines, and storm sewer lines. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEngineer1ng \Genera1\60 - 69 Slreets\3101 West 69th Street Developement\2010 CVS\Approvals\20100924 review of CVS.docx A10 k 0 a w�� ti�.rrr�rr� vsn i� _ 0 onf Y rr.. rS 4 _ rrrrrrwa �� __�irr reluw�e m��rr rb w�rr w rug a tr r ww �.w� r Yrr�� �' M w Ri ly�w rrw. w w.r. (eaul wrwM d wr� YrIY� � ±4�wr�wu°� IY�a e rsr. ��r .r r wr � wMw wa Its o+aAo. AEVIS60 v Y� catY r. oR 1®SI _ 00 "? O O 0 O 0 see KOFIIB 0 20 40 SCALE IN rE&[ Gopher State One Call Pt-Nu CVSD phumm NOSED EE)R ENSEAMCE YORK AVENUE SOUTH Ma VYFST 69TH 57REFf cvS6fSUV M SSORE E Srm EL ij VELMEat COMPANIES ASSOCIATES �•d��wrA N� �a � ¢m NIl10 0 1. �s mma�w 1L �, L we'w UnLrrY PLAN Loucks Piolect No 06416 C4 -1 i �11 2 I 1 1 PROPOSED ^\ TYPE sf. 96' -10- X 1137' -6' 1 . STALLS REQUIRED 1 B6 ALLS PRONDED q, 3 PROOF FFE.07a50.� DTI �M� - -- r w Fm4 02_.rte .�rsrr ..; >y i i i °'� �Orf � Imvre i o m w ,f•• scus of rnr — 1a— 1 a • � v M L / L I Low I x , �0 M, ° S� ®I u voa w m Gopher State One Call 6�t� �I�rG �CAIV WED oou oa.ANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUM WEST 69TH STREET Cv Cs.smr Cvs STORE r= cwwe NOOpMOD MIT. MN VELMEIR COMPANIES ASSOCIATES 0 � m GRADING A DRAINAGE PLAN Loucks Project No 06416 0 -1 L.. _ o uL-1 �, ..... . - ...., - © .. ,Him o o' i�0000eoo , Him F� _$ °;�= a" oen0. �_ o_ eo''cro_o_na "eon_Qri�io`Le`Ope>✓ o - - -_ -- -- — �o'�� s o �-- o — m® m e PROPOSED cvs ff1 ■yo; �p l Q] H 0 000 `%V �l 6e� c � hh,arm' -icY Ul o s i Op/ u 000 I_ AIL ��- -- �\ ssi© ■O 1 m e� °a.° c�: o: ao.' o: c:o:oo's:ooc:o:o:e:e0:nre:o:e�p 89 STALLS REQUIRED gm 1.0. Cm C�7 in 6131 86 STALLS PRONADED •OO o o - ■i i7`.1 m m QJ F� p i e o • ■ ��fa== oe-v.=`= = - _= --o-u - - Zao -- _ -- ----- -- -2 :-F --- -_ - - - -e .; -�� •, _ ■ ��� - -�� ,�oOl. I IO C' i m an ■ �' u, : T�e Z4t��= C�= L• ��i ®3�`�3S�7t� =�6�LtS3iLi3i�------; - -- ------- - - - - -` FRW TM LOOSEN ROOTS OF WAWRTWTH0R0UCKVDU%M TO PLANTING e PERENNIAL PLANTING ® REFER T. PLAN SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF IrMlhL HOLE PRK)R TO PLANTING VAM STAKE5 W SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT WITH PROPOSED GRAX USH - - - _ - r DECIDUOUS PLANDNGSOB- SEESPEC 1= 11-11 1 =1 — I- 1 BUILDING WAIL DYPI DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL -1 . —' r ' 1 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL Acol st APf tr4 �f.AN ANDSCAPE PLAN: WAROE— MUGATION 1$A ■" i7 R [c ■I 1 ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ QR71NGT6 By GTNO6 TYPE A - 13,013 sl. 89 ST4LS REWIRED 86 STALLS PROVIDED + 3 PROOF EUM OF- I®IGTION Z PERENNIAL PIANTING i¢mNnvR� L1.1 rRE nr .... WtW gwac- TYQ WM�aRANN1IL wm,.m. RBaroRAN w�Ewumww vi®a IRAN. YlpasroQrwIDVnuT O1°q TvaorrrfwxxslsRUSI may.W.m m01NTSD Qaq. mQNN01.100).S49E: ll,mYM rARQ -�� mmzlurmt.>u>u mawm•IBaronAN . m rr�im7� — nxaPlGS@.ms� T 1 — 17 RQONCwwlmm 7 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL It -I w. r WIMMI REv�SE� tANOSCAM ?tAP - �� ,YlMxlaroaMGUIDIYraRBNInCWal ro� ®� . wYTTaYkRwYPw,La@Y.�,m.�w.�r�.,u CVSD Paa,m Y,o�eiww r$,w nwevmw MTmmcr!@mm @a+Ym.wnw. camlr•sa uTncroMY,TUawmrvlawm ww,ammaWgwR rxv YWRr•LTUamwR,lwnnrm . ww noarou.l l,o - - -� m�Nloxu am •P, O,rineiars s,gwxxoawreroM YYwl ua wYY'iew,�ns� V'�mw�r "°"ydy r r WmY •omc, •r,•wO�wmrnml �� lw, e].raq,QMOEw.uma Q,o,ra Mnmsn Ywa nar roW roaNmro@xr•n raves wQe•+a! MODRED RIGHT ENTRANCE E 1�.— urour. M0 Wr0ulswl [Q fm Y¢ls,0os ®uam Ygmanmm9,. I I u "c YORK AVENUE SOUTH r __ @xnwnaY.vL ramaTwL �,.clo•mamvx,Q! Yarmsro w,nuwre YOYn naoRaYa.rcrlwR.c ,mNlo•Pawno�Tmxr•cT wm, "9iO1 WEST 69TH STREET cv5cse '�e TM, `lx, uY•grosva YwLam•®awoaR cvsara]]W 1 �� Ba,OUm.Barl�nwt l-S'S STOREIS]Y 1 13 WwKTV TxYawv.wvPO.,wa@u,wawa rnTQE 1 `\t —_ uarIDiaw,.VOUOUrgw, Yrtna�umnorEiM rwn,«rg s,vsm,wwmmwowaala.lkol,u WMQPO•CT]v IT'. NN 1 -'I r�r, O1Q ',4,r@MWfO0a0Y61YRlO•l,•,1@,L wlpt�AtropprkwryOfwY8yW0a 1 Q @OPMBIY,r -PgWNm ,., r � waww®mBaBIWPwa QlwromeTtaouW Vai•OEV.rilaomaQAlPwf,OrN1fY]M0 E OIIMgxN Wlw„W6q N0 Oal,r la0ro � OSr,FRV.rtfa®rwro,rmro,gR,nc ax aBwwT VELMEIR 1 NNOYArtEOxIRN :,OfswYrlaRq®1]NaRwarYPC•x 1 'I Pccwrouaa rp„u,wW.RONmumawnoRal wc,,,, o, ,,u,W,,,,,,,,,,a>.a>timx,,.r,naM cowrwxiE, 1 ,''m`m,P¢ougnE•RO woxerow•roNRP.I®ro meawaQwxq loves nEY YwLUwPmrtnf•M r �gwlxoBlrcT.rgxwl cv.nw.TwRwL wmr •x. w, o,ov,uowa,rmRroama,u�aaPmuu,cr,n r oaomBr®NBVroWxnQCTaxwmrurR* �M lmx,unoQ Q,rar®lmroPam waaove•YaEI¢ *asw. ,n„ rw.,m.am.uaQSV@ i_ � �.uuon wmomaMra.mow,ua , w, ,,lu'�°i,PC P4oPCCaYa wm�•gmcn,.o,o »m YsRCrrowm,gano,rawanro ASSOCIATES 1 I mforl�DlWU ®,wgv,zmmveuoro MwmY mOIK,u Yw„ow[MOmmw,lx• r — Yrw•m TaTUaovw avmc YRawnnwavn �romuAwx�nla vaolBE•nmrr.nroMnmiaT m.J �w,..,y I , rBrawrmmnwo,uw.oa %. mmo,BNOrow.wrw,mN ®rnxaawerrtn r urar,Y,wrwu,EaY�� rM �.Mmwnvgaa,oaa Ya�mvnl�v�ow,w - IM7r uaom.,ln MwwmvmaTnnv�wowwRw 6r°PQmEllo,w,o,..on.Rwmnr . rra,w.wr 1 I NIAWxwm101M0Bf•LTOdwg04oNRR �• aB,Bmn•RMnvW.OEgwnxl¢rE•BSr]sYC r1Ea 1 m rm %M M•r,WV�aMwmfM.,ml1¢T 1 — mOR�IxInGwuarm•um Yxn m.,en a.Ywlewo wmarmauroa 1 cniemcnwxa a,NO]wurronMrm@YI xBw � w.E�a Ynrs ®nam mwoam,m.n®m v.qv @,�"nrt"Ci0',wa PQEnv.a:uwmr�womMOnra r _ ,mo ruaowRnT.Q @r.nv.w,!•� � 1 _ RAlam.IK 1 _I ,r@YL rRrw, OBNQ[p WlroOemGOMlnawn® µIM IwrE.[p�u®rYgo� 1 ,a�i .rnrorol,¢w„oa > ®PWl afdrY, @Wes �KnaVw,nue,10•wY,•q wlolxr.,o¢vTfaro 1 it Om•alq•BmOrfm • ®urn BwLQMa9ala•InaM E L 'W Y�nw,v�n,�OMWn�DWrooYarGm � Wr,G'�alr�,E�,Ytai@ • ] @Mgmwafwu Y•w IO.NBI.v41aQRwrR,wQOHA4/arlgBR 1 — f�CY.o>mM ®Ywartw�,OMaollV.n anfaq @rm/C1ot Y„Ia pYAYOa xtw Rwr r!,@u Rmial ONF YBnQY m..,,wRxMUro,mRO.q rwwQ•.,uR,m.MBBnaow,nr®rwn. _ �.. �_ � _ I 91O�m 8YM xnO�w. OQWprNlaa9YLL xr„OV �MOMmMO�a MwrGa MWa>f �.� - -.._ ._..�. J aOIO�,Ya Lwl]Qq.E,.xOairONYanwx r.aN, �prf•,YL.1®Yr4 wLLaW®BW. — �Y. -:f.� =� naETwaaAlPanT®BYYaq,Qko« aNQBN®a.,.wTq„m,®gWal.rraw r I�uiwamwr.w,Trro ®awq. rm.YU,Erwoankwowamns,naxWwenv.a 1 , ra®vawuwtmYaakBErBBgoWm WaT.,�r. Penwn,oxwo,avrormBCl . vIDrwu 1 �a,Yl'�mo YaT.pmPTPYLIQI®FxQO„a I,w�nu nnou r�u,Y�iw,n •"�wma.numrvrac - � � RY.ORONwRa YBYI a,OGRO/uV RwrokYrtwx MTBr OWIRaxa Tw,wmrofrr i1 �,mWE�roQak®wRxan,� Ya,Wq�BWawIL „�rxR]Ra�n.l = YNYI„Yaoa MloQ r wnm - , 0�80 M rOrOa[l i. rYa ®r6 �Q,Nirwl000l w✓aroY A I - �reapum[DP MUr�wR �nM '� �. Y'V'^°�d�nao.nleror . WCGM COnV[101EQ,OMRtw®O„anW N� ,IETQM,W @wvMrLrtM s= IN Fla OWU,v Cj MRBn00,MLOG,W PrQ•Oaa RwO Y„ml,YBrQ piwOGOMM1rL w,OWwrO,wlGRr II- � � W�EYI 1paLTMB1Qaww®.MIn.MM!<gll>atn44 M100xa 1MB i I,1•nORe,••B,T,YRr Qwffa]YronwOOrLRM w1RAMw �Pwla@n! ®V� ®M,MIq, '�T• MRAMrI. rokA •PVRrtLlllmfr6rrRT•TO W91K,MLa6rPCdaq,9x Ca,N @roa,Wll � �-•r� w01, mwRD,alflMlaulOrnufBCB,wra VRiN.•N ®rnr ONON,Ow,aGn.wrYw�Ot,mwuwFxw,r r,M`.,m�woa awn,almmv a @Rlvvula Ywimu.w® warY�`•w,o�waPalcaw•a.mro @rQ IMOIf wRxIW NJa191Y MILAfrY, �,Yn®.asOwDUTM @4x10)E,Iw1a MY1,�K•�. —� alolwPMRR,vxncvecnMm]wseL ,YEBCnu.,r,xuw,o . c u..wawE _� YLn.vmNC •fu,araT.camum@,amB » ws uNOR-,wr mRUOUSxku mv.Q,mwu,mrclox ��t� nnNw .c��'m.��i.e�aiQAn:srR�mmv,a.0 ° me cv.xao.comare„aY�Yn ro.YOw r]RnwArofrx+uawmlPrkllssxn �wmrvv.wlgawowmuloMwavcm. em m ee ° r!a •nlnf Y Y PLANT SCHEDULE 1' y Ory WYYO. n1YE Go R] COYYExTB ..___ AP,e mEE 1.�-uL BB ewclE ereY BOULEVARD LOBIEN lY• ®rlem 9WwN ,. BfB BnOLE Bret w MABVEBT E CMBA 00 PPLE Y IORM I.Y CAI BB0 Bw0 Bret � -°OO PP BBB BQOLE BTEY ti YwB Yq TREE B•b Lb. ken' 1.0 Cpl POT BagP STEM a OECR)UOUB B R Be — w •1 UROUN TCAROWELBMBERR uwum nunu TI•ama' ]• r1AxT •'O.C. — I a R d s C 8 0 e ! 0 r m s• ° aN x• xu of euawXOOxETaucklE CO .rNC.n. RYO.m 1, naT uxi •'o.c. — S C IID REODNOYE WOW000 Cmw••O••rNU RNDmmr 3•xOT O •D.C. •^� �v�'� �i �� u erne PRnceaB BPwEa s Pm.... Ir xa Po PuNr a•a.c. •� LANDSCAPE �_� xrEROUe lxxue! PLAN 4 ARCATA BENCH -o� Deakoon P EAR W P u ao.c. owAR awx ooLO aun.Yla a POT PuxT f•D.c. Ll -1 'P•rr •' O E OwI JUxVER Am u R P,fOM �BPBO O r1A O.C. no„u a IAYNTON EW T•TQ•mMf T•mnw' Ir 8PR0 PO PLRNir O.C. •>-�- eRExxwLe lnucla Projea No 06416 Bre Pw.o. o ro.c. Tmu!— Bla LITne B y 90E BYIILT BcYx.a N •e IOM POT --.C. pg EY EROfl BEOUY YEm d� PO 1 —T. I .. L1 -1 f N087H � t I0 20u1I0 I _ C 6C>k8 01 PBRi ® Gopher State One Call v s�� S ITe PtAQ SM PLAN GVl M4 NOTES rr�.rr. ...w.rr _ .n.....rr . > r rwararr.� wr r war 46n r q NrNwrra4 �.rwnw ar > w4.rwT br +�n�r.rswn�. vhrw rw r Apra pAayr4+va •war +rvwwr ra�nw 4wruwwrw r P.Ir n w ar � r r4rra r Irn n.r Iew rnr r.r✓•n A/4.4 r rr nr� r rr.w wrrr�rrarrP lr s.� v.Q ^r� -�� rrrrrr�r �ra �r�s s rir ewrwv.rW�wr r rr. r r.rNrrr r wr � an rr4 rr p.4r ral r arr �rrrrnr.rrrrru4 arre4rnrrrrrrry rrwa.I ... r 4+r4 r r Wr w n�I aar ..r M Rar w �wlmMrnrrrilrs w��ww wr �J • O • ®O 01 r.. a o o. M l T. sv �« rpmmc7l— CVS/ 4006® IDff DMAN(E YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET cvscsfsz M STORE P IM Orror E06U Nosnw4couNn,MN VELMEIR COMPANIES GM WEf y/85 v�'sci •mac S'11I10 0 3!'L umc mnr � m 3L ma L`L m STE PLAN Loucks Project No 06416 Cz_, Z L L _vs L C55 67 SEC GOTH STREET W AL AND 70TH S TREET YORK AVENUES EDINA, MINNEWTA u l- V LL- �4- 7&SSOCIATE5 ww, vo -j 'I M /Buu RAC IT, i I BENCHES 69 T H STREET 'AWL 4 IKE RAci( 4 TIt 19.9 4 PEDESTRIAN Sq ACCESS ROUTE • am BENCH PEDESTRIAN EXHiBrr 04/2212010 ?EIDESTRiAN EXHIIIII VELMEIR COMPANIES iEXPLANATION OF PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT MODIFICATIONS Vehneir Companies, the Proponent, is proposing to develop the site identified as 6905 York Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, as a full service CVS Pharmacy store. The site is presently undeveloped. Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy have entered into a ground lease with the property owner, York Place Vilest, LLC. The entire site encompasses 69,499 square feet (1.60 acres) while the store building will occupy 13,013 square feet. The site is presently zoned as a planned commercial district (PCD -3). The zoning will remain as a PCD -3 site. The site is subject to a developer's agreement dated August 27, 2009 and the City of Edina's Resolution No. 2009 -55. This Resolution sets forth a number of conditions which must be met by the Developer. Item No. 11 in the Resolution prohibits a drive through facility on this site. The Proponent is requesting that the prohibition of a drive through facility be removed as a condition since all PCD sites permit a drive through facility as an accessory use under City Ordinance 950.16. The Proponent is also requesting a confirmation of the Resolution requirement that the building setbacks from both York Avenue South and Test 69th Street be 20 feet rather than the standard 35 feet to achieve a "downtown" look to the site, i.e., the building will sit closer to the public sidewalks. This placement of the building will also enhance the parking facilities. The Proponent has requested that Hennepin County approve the curb cut modification on York Avenue with a larger right turn in/right turn out only configuration. The Proponent is also requesting a new right turn out egress from its requested drive through facility and a modification of the existing full access curb cut at the rear of the site which also services the apartment building. The Proponent is providing for the handling of the storm water runoff from the site via a development at the rear of the site. Parking will be provided by 90 stalls. The City's ordinance calls for 90 stalls. These stalls will be larger than the required minimum size. ummary— thia-Pmponent is- requesting. 1. the removal of the restriction against a drive through facility; 2. the confirmation of the variance set forth in Resolution 2009 -55 which provided that the building pad would be set back 2Q feet from York Avenue South and Vilest 69th Street rather than the usual 35 feet; 3. the development of a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on Vilest 69th Street); A (t VELMEIR COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT ]PLAIN Intended Use of the Property Velmeir Companies History Velmeir Companies and its client, CVS Pharmacy, have entered into a ground lease with York Place West, LLC for the site known as 6905 York Avenue South. It is the intention of Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy to construct a 13,000 square foot retail store, with a drive through facility, on this site. The development would also include 90 customer parking stalls and a loading/unloading lane at the rear of the store. Velmeir Companies is requesting an upgraded curb cut on York Avenue, a new curb cut on West 69"' Street [both of which would be right tuni in -right turn out uses] and a modification of the full access curb cut presently existing on West 69th Street. Velmeir Companies is a Michigan corporation with offices also located in Florida, Washington, DC in addition to its Minnesota office located at 7201 West 78th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota. The company has been in the development business for approximately 10 years. It is the preferred developer for CVS Pharmacy in the State of Minnesota and has constructed approximately 35 stores in the greater Twin Cities area. In addition, it has constructed CVS sites, and other developments, in a number of states. All WEST ELEVATION - Y 0 R K AVENUE SOUTH 5-1; vl' - P -V EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEME •in r un m wia w s�ivn u vm a rlo .,w.w SULO 1/1' • 1'-Y NORTH ELEVATION - WEST 69TH STREET SG1[I 1A' • 1'4' W! EAST ELEVATION SMI: 1/1' - 1' -0' �s dr F— CD to LU MuS� 1— cm LU 3 s Q9 Pll •l m ;LMEIR OMPANIES F� f } `. I_— ,t rvr—" 40 dw C) Ln LU 7M LU G-7 00 v , RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 3 13. The project will be built according to the final plans and specifications and with materials as presented at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 17, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mange , it lerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of / .2008. U ity C rk Alt �I T wTLWG l su NORTH 0 220 4410 SCALE W FLEE ,&VW` cAU ear — — %A=ff v. M Ef AND UOSTNQ vsvnmit pitevious 517E f LAA w9r,r� w � yy� � MEMORANDUM ® Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: May 20, 2010 T®: Cary Teague —Doty Planner . ✓��� FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works I City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed CVS Vilest 66th Street and York Avenue South Engineering has re- reviewed plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. • All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet — C2 -1 Site Plan: 1. Access onto York Avenue will require approval from Hennepin County. If Hennepin County allows a right -in / right -out then a sign shall be placed at the Stop Sign stating "No Access to West Bound W. 69th St" 2. Move sidewalk along York Avenue to have a minimum of 5 -foot sodded boulevard. 3. Keep all drive isles at minimum of 24 -ft (revise drive isle just east of dumpster). Expand heavy duty pavement areas to entire perimeter drive isles. 4. Use standard City of Edina curb detail when curbs are adjacent to sidewalks. Sheet — C3 -1 Grading and Drainage Plan & C4 -1 Utility Plan: 1. Note "Private" on plan for all utilities including sanitary sewer, storm sewers and water mains. This is the first re- review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks r � GAEngineeringlGenera1160 - 69 Streetsk3201 West 69th Street Developement1112106 review of York Place.doc A�' MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the' Edina Planning.Commission Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair'Mike Fischer, Jeff Carpenter, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, ,Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiel, Arlene Forrest and Karwehn Kata STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague -and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the April 28, 2010, Planning Commission meeting were filed with a correction. II. NEW BUSINESS: 2008.0004.10a Final Development Plan Velmeir Companies /CVS Pharmacy 6905 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 13,000 square foot retail store with ar drive- through facility on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. Planner Teague reported in 2008, a Final Development Plan was approved for the site to build two retail buildings that totaled 18,0.00 square feet in size. The proposed plan is generally consistent with the previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls for one 13,000 square foot building, rather than two buildings totalling 18,000 square feet., 2. The proposed plan calls for a drive- through facility. A:condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive- through facilities. The request requires a revised Final Development Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the principal building and A.) a Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 2 from 35 feet to 31 feet for the canopy. The 20 -foot setback variances requested were also approved as part of the previously approved plan. Planner Teague delivered a power point report concluding that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan with Variances at 6905 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. 3) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian connections c. The unique circumstance is the sites prominent location in close proximity to Southdale and the Galleria shopping areas. The city would like to encourage a more pedestrian environment in this area. d. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setbacks; however, it would encourage parking in front of the building as parking stalls would be lost in the rear if the building met required setbacks. Approval of the Final Development Plan and variances are subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 23, 2010. Q evations date stain 3 2010. �u,td+ag -el �,-�� ���,,,�2 , 2) A final landscape plan must be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 123 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 3 5) Submit a copy of the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6) Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7) Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 20, 2010. Appearing for the Applicant Gordon Johnson, Kevin McGee and Michael Spack representing CVS. Discussion Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague if the proposal requires a rezoning. Planner Teague responded that the site is zoned PCD -3; no change in zoning designation is required. Commissioner Kata asked Planner Teague if the parking count includes the adjacent parking for the apartment complex. Planner Teague responded that the apartment is self - parked. Chair Fischer asked Planner Teague if there are cross - easements between the apartment complex and the CVS site. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Gordon Johnson, 3600 American Boulevard addressed the Commission and informed them in today's market drug stores require a drive - through window to remain competitive. Johnson pointed out that drive - through windows are a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district. Continuing, Johnson said that directional signage will be incorporated into the site to control traffic. Concluding, Johnson acknowledged that everyone appreciates the 50th & France Avenue streetscape, adding that in working closely with City staff they believe the proposed building placement creates a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere on this corner. Kevin McGee, 7201 78th Street West, told the Commission CVS Pharmacy is proposing to construct a 13,000 square foot retail store, with drive - through facility. The project in I ud s 90 customer parking stalls and a loading /unloading lane at the rear of the store. CVS also has a ground lease with the York West apartments directly to its east. The apartment complex was part of the original approved plan with the subject site earmarked for multi- tenant retail development. Mr. McGee said CVS is requesting the following: 1. Removal of the restriction against a drive - through facility; this condition was for the previous development of the site. gat Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 4 2. Retain the variance approving a 20 foot setback from York Ave and 69th Street. This variance was approved with the previous request to create a pedestrian feel. 3. Allow a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on 69th St West). Discussion Commissioner Grabiel in response to a comment from Mr. Johnson on the need for a drive - through pointed out that both Target and Cub Foods operate a pharmacy without a drive - through. Mr. McGee acknowledged that fact; however, he pointed out those stores are not strictly drug stores like a CVS is. Continuing, McGee said many people use drug stores with the drive - through option when they are sick or physically are not able to come into a store for one reason or another. McGee said their market research indicates that a drive - through window was key in the success of a drug store /pharmacy. Commissioner Risser asked Mr. McGee the speed at which people drop off /pick up their prescriptions, pointing out vehicles are idling as they wait. Risser suggested asking customers to turn off their engines while waiting. McGee responded they have found that at most two vehicles are stacked waiting to drop off /pick up their prescription(s). McGee said the "stops" are usually very quick. McGee noted rarely would someone drop off and wait for their prescription to be filled. Concluding, McGee said CVS can consider the "engine off' suggestion. Commissioner Risser asked Mr. McGee if their market study took into consideration that there is a Walgreens Drug Store directly adjacent to this site. McGee responded that CVS came into the Minnesota market roughly a few years ago and the market studies indicated there was room for competition. He acknowledged he doesn't know if the market study considered a drug store in such close proximity to a site. Concluding, McGee said in retail it's always location, location, location. Chair Fischer noted that on the schematics two "entrances" are illustrated; however, they appear different. Mr. McGee agreed, adding there is a "false entrance" at the corner of West 69th Street/York Avenue with the main entrance angled at the southwest corner of the building. The "doors" match but are different with the entrance off the parking lot. Chair Fischer asked Mr. McGee if the CVS drug stores are always built at the height depicted, adding he thinks the building is a bit too tall. Mr. McGee responded the buildings are proposed at this height to screen the mechanical. Chair Fischer asked if storm water tanks will be underground. McGee said the storm water system was installed to the rear of the site with the apartment complex. Public Comments Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Vivian Bauman, 6913 Xerxes Avenue, Richfield told the Commission she lives across from the new apartment building and since it's been constructed she has lost her ,ras' Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 5 sunlight and experienced an increase in traffic on Xerxes Avenue. Ms. Bauman reported that presently 800 +vehicles use Xerxes Avenue, adding she wants to make sure that traffic directional signs, on the proposed CVS'site do not direct traffic onto Xerxes Avenue. Ms. Bauman said she is also worried about on street parking'if parking is compromised on the apartment and CVS site. Concluding, Ms, Bauman stated Xerxes Avenue already bears an incredible traffic burden and this proposal'will only add to that. Chair Fischer asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue. Being none, Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion A discussion ensued on traffic flow, turn lanes, internal traffic circulation and the potential for traffic to spill onto Xerxes Avenue. Mr. McGee said signage is proposed to deter patrons from using Xerxes Avenue. Mr. Johnson added that vehicles going south on York Avenue can.turn left on West 69th Street to access the site. Commissioner Forrest noted vehicles also have the option of a right turn onto 69th Street, and that option coupled with the right turn only for the drive - through would direct traffic to Xerxes. Commissioner Forrest said when approval was given to the previous project traffic flow onto Xerxes Avenue was. an important consideration. Commissioner Brown stated as proposed he cannot support the project. Brown said that in his opinion the internal traffic circulation on the site just doesn't work. Brown pointed out the site has multiple access points creating cross traffic especially because of the location of the drive4hrough, Brown'said he has no problem with the variances that allow building placement up to the street; however, the internal vehicle circulation and drive - through location as designed is unsafe. Commissioner Forrest said she. agrees with Commissioner Brown reiterating that in her opinion_right turn only for the drive - through would only funnel traffic back to Xerxes Avenue.. Commissioner Forrest said she also has a concern with pedestrian patterns in the parking lot. Mr. Spack told the Commission that in working with City staff on orienting the building rinser to York and 69th streets impacted wher6th`e drive - through could be located. Continuing, Mr. Spack noted the exit onto West 69th Street allows both right and left hand turns. Mr. Spack said they are requesting that Hennepin County allow them to improve the curb cut on York Avenue with ia larger right turn in /right turn out only configuration. A discussion ensued on building placement and if the proposed location of the building actually creates a pedestrian friendly atmosphere or would pulling the building back into the site is better. Commissioners acknowledged the goal of creating a more pedestrian AJ& Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 6 friendly streetscape, questioning if this plan actually does that. It was noted that the fagade along York Avenue while being close to the street doesn't achieve that goal. The majority of patrons would park in the parking lot and use the door on the south elevation. It was acknowledged that the previous plan was for multiple tenants not one. Action /further Discussion Commissioner Brown moved denial of 2008.0004.10a Final Development Plan for CVS Pharmacy. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. Planner Teague requested that the Commission issue findings to support the denial, or have the applicant revise the plan. Planner Teague said the Commission has to be cognizant of the 60 -day rule. Mr. McGee said CVS would be willing to table their request with some direction from the Commission, especially with drive- through placement. Commissioner Brown reiterated that in his opinion the current location of the drive - through in the middle of the site just doesn't work. Brown suggested a north /south configuration. Mr. McGee responded if the drive - through is relocated north /south with a York Avenue exit the passenger side would face the drive -up window, not the driver's side; which is the ideal situation. Commissioner Carpenter acknowledged it appears the location of the drive - through is the stumbling block, adding the original goal was to achieve a pedestrian friendly site; however, the fagade at the street doesn't accomplish that goal. Commissioner Grabiel stated it may be possible to position the building in the southeast corner of the site. He added pedestrians do walk/cross etc. into parking lots all the time to enter /exit buildings. Chair Fischer briefly explained to the applicant the history of the site and the vision the Planning Commission had for this corner. Fischer commented at this point the Commission may have to give up on their vision of "pedestrian friendliness" and review a typical development plan. Fischer acknowledged that the proponent did make efforts to create a more pedestrian friendly fagade; however, in his opinion those efforts fell short. Fischer concluded that the proponent could bring back either scenario for review. Commissioner Risser said she believes this site is a bit tricky for redevelopment. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague what happens with a denial. Planner Teague said if the Commission denies the request the proponent could proceed with, the request to the City Council for a vote or they could take time to review their options and bring a revised plan back to the Planning Commission. Aar Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 26, 2010 Page 7 Commissioner Staunton said the Commission should accord the applicant flexibility and allow them to decide if they want the proposal continued or denied. Mr. McGee responded that CVS would like the Commission to continue their request for Final Development Plan approval to the next meeting of the Commission. Commissioner Brown withdrew his motion. Commissioner Carpenter withdrew his second. Commissioner Staunton moved to continue item 2008.0004.10a to the June 30, 2010, Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion, noting the applicant is agreeable to the continuance. All voted aye; motion carried. III. COMMUNITY COMMENT: Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place, addressed the Commission and said she was interested in the continuing process of revising the Zoning Code and asked how one could participate. Chair Fischer explained that once a month the Planning Commission holds a work session to discuss topics. Chair Fischer said the public is welcome to attend all sessions, adding they are held the 2nd Wednesday of each month in the Council Chambers. Chair Fischer also suggested if anyone is interested in the re -write process to also sign up for City Extra which posts all meetings. Ms. Hoganson asked if the Commission was familiar with the latest Three Rivers 9 -Mile Creek bike trail plan and that process. Chair Fischer responded that he isn't familiar with the plan or the process and asked Planner Teague if he was aware of the plan. Planner Teague responded that he believes Three Rivers is spearheading the project and directed Ms. Hoganson to contact the Park and Recreations Director, John Keprios for further information. Susan Clark, 5812 61St Street West asked the steps developers take to seek approval from the Nine Mile creek watershed district. Ms. Clark said it appears to her that the watershed district hears a proposal after the City process in complete. Ms. Clark commented that in her opinion it would be better if the Planning Commission had "in hand" the watershed district input before they made their decision on a project. Planner Teague responded that it appears the policy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is to hear an item after it has been through the itv aonmval nrnrpss, adding there wouldn't be an application if the project wasn't approved by the City. Chair Fischer commented that it appears there is no best answer. W r�� o e a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator. Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teagu'e May 26, 2010 2008- 004.10a Director of Planning. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy is requesting to build a 13,000 square foot retail store with a drive - through facility. on the vacant parcel at 6905 York Avenue. (See location on pages A1—A5 and the narrative and plans on pages A6 —A21 a.) In 2008, a Final. Development Plan was approved for the site to build two retail buildings that totaled 18,000 square feet in size. (See previously approved plan for the site on page A25 and the approving resolution on pages A22 —A24.) The proposed plan is generally consistent with the previous plan with two exceptions: 1. The proposed plan calls for one 13,000 square foot building, rather than two-buildings totalling 18,000 square feet. 2. .,The proposed plan calls fora drive- through facility. A condition of approval of the previous plan specifically prohibited drive - through facilities. (See the approving resolution on pages A22 —A24.) The request requires a revised. Final Development -Plan with building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from York Avenue and 69th Street for the principal building and from 35 feet,to 31 feet for the canopy. The 20 -foot setback variances requested were also approved as part of the previously approved plan. ( ee_Oags A25.) — SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding land Uses Northerly: Key Cadillac; zoned and guided commercial. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield.. Southerly: Walgreens, Clean N Press Cleaners, Kids Hair and two medical clinics; zoned,and guided commercial. Westerly: The Westin hotel, condominiums and parking garage; zoned and guided commercial. Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.6 acres in size and is vacant. The site is.�relatively flat. (See pages A3 —A5.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Final Development Plan Review Commercial PCD -3, Planned Commercial District Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial use. The . proposed uses (pharmacy and drive - through window) are permitted within the PCD -3 zoning district, which this property is designated. Therefore, the proposed uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The buildings would be brought up closer to the street than what standard zoning would allow, to encourage a pedestrian friendly environment along the street. This is also consistent with principles of the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development. Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; A Preliminary Development Plan is only required for a property requested to - -- be rezoned No rezoning is requested The plan is aPnerally consistent with the previously approved Final Development Plan for the site, with the exception of the drive- through facility, which was previously prohibited. (See page A23.) A drive - through facility is a permitted use in PCD -3 zoning district, which this property is zoned. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the previous Final Development Plan to allow a drive- through facility c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; 4 The single -story retail building with a drive- through would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use; The applicant is proposing a - 13,000 square feet of retail, where 18,000 square feet was previously approved. The proposal would increase green space on.the site, and,.meets.the floor area ratio requirement; therefore, staff believes the proposal is appropriate for this site. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study on pages A27 —A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, .2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A71 —A2.) t) .conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and With the exception of the variances, the proposal conforms to the zoning ordinances. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and has provided comment on page A26. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site, as there are no off -site pond expansions available. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking Based on the square footage of the building, 80 parking stalls are required. The site plans show 90 parking stalls. Building Design The retail space would be built of brick.and large windows. (See attached development plans and page A13 —A14.) The entrance to the store has been 3 located to face York Avenue, as was required of the previously proposed retail space. An additional false front has been created right at the corner of 69th and York to appear as an entrance to the store. Landscaping The landscape plan has been designed to match the previously approved plan, which was part of an overall plan contemplated for the site. (See page A25.) Green space and landscaping would be increased from the previous two office buildings with large surface parking lots that previously existed on the site. (See page A4.) Compliance Table * Variance Required 2 City Standard Proposed Front — York Avenue 35 feet 20 feet* Side Street — 69th Street 35 feet 20 feet* building & 31 feet* for canopy Side — South 0 83 feet Rear — West 0 197 feet Building .Height 4 stories or 1 stories and 28 feet 50 feet, whichever is less Floor Area Ratio 100% 96% total both sites 19% subject site Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 20 feet setback Parking Stalls 80 90 Drive - Through Stacking 4 spaces per bay 5 spaces Drive - Through Canopy 35 feet 31 feet* Setback Over -story Trees 44 required 85 total (number is based on the 25 on the subject site erimeter of development site) * Variance Required 2 Primary Issues Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: The proposed uses are permitted in the PCD -3 District. Retail space /drug store and a drive- through window is a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district. With the exception of the canopy, the drive - through would meet all the city's minimum requirements for drive- through's including stacking space, stacking location and setback. 2. The project would encourage pedestrian movement. The proposal encourages pedestrian movement to and from the site by providing a large sidewalk along York Avenue and 69th Street. There would also be a pedestrian connection from the apartments. (See pages A15 and A25.) The sidewalk shown along York Avenue would have to be reconfigured per the comments of the city engineer. (See page A26.) A green space separation between the York Avenue and the side walk would have to be provided. 3. The retail building has been shifted up to the street in an attempt to screen the parking from the roadway and encourage pedestrian movement. 4. With the exception of the variances, the project would meet all zoning ordinance requirements. Would the existing roadways support the project? Yes. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study on pages A27 A64.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 20, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A71— A72.) Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: 5 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable. With the exception of the canopy, these are the same variances previously approved by the City Council in 2008. Section 850.16. Subd. 12.C. states that "the city encourages i) ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment and ii) pedestrian connections by way of skyways and tunnels and, therefore, the City Council will consider exceptions to setback requirements for these purposes." The purpose of this request is to create an active pedestrian and streetscape and encourage pedestrian movement to and from the site. A traditional 35 -foot suburban retail setback typically encourages parking lots between the street and building. However, in this project, the buildings would be pulled up close to the street, and parking would be partially screened by the building and landscaping. (See page Al and A25.) Sidewalks would connect to the apartments and encourage on and off site pedestrian movement. This is a prominent retail corner within the city. A functional concern at this site and surrounding area, is that it is not very pedestrian friendly. Pulling the buildings up to the street will hopefully encourage pedestrian friendly developments in the area in the future. The building could be shifted back to meet the required setbacks, however, that would encourage parking in front of the building, as parking would be lost at the rear. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not - Common mon o er °similarly z ned property, and that-are -n_.+ self - -- created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the sites prominent location in close proximity to Southdale and the Galleria shopping areas. Providing sidewalks along the street would encourage pedestrian movement between these uses. The City of Edina would like to encourage pedestrian movement in this area, and the proposed variances which pull the buildings up closer to the street would help to achieve that. G 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No'. The proposed one -story retail building with sidewalks along the street would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Counci[ approve-the Final Development Plan with Variances at 6905 York Avenue for Velmeir Companies on behalf of CVS Pharmacy. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. 3) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian connections c. The unique circumstance is the sites prominent location in close proximity to Southdale and the Galleria shopping areas. The city would like to encourage a more pedestrian environment in this area. d. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setbacks; however, it would encourage parking in front of the building .te n s parking sta is would be lr,oF i�h�e rear li -t11G building met required setbacks. Approval of the Final Development Plan and variances are subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: 7 • Site plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 23, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped April 23, 2010. 2) A final landscape plan must be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5) Submit a copy of the Hennepin County Access Permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6) Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7) Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 20, 2010. Deadline for a city decision: August 17, 2010 0 k- City of Edina sz+o fa Logund oeto Highlighted Feature ]7 ♦ Mmse NumDar LODOK J00 Ni 9,..t Nema L..W. 9 a 700 ^/ city u"'s red a704 r' C—L. ,y � I�ka NLmea swr, S� ft C lakds Ci Park. alas Zoning WT 1).eles.roit Varcra Ocr 1 tlOD�.IMey Dae:rn�f Dear�l OCa 7' ■ tl0951t1mr OmsssemifD�ryl ■ 70De 1k1, –•Dc.i apnan D.raal ® P„D- 11Paaxa Ler.�a.S DC1ml z a90s rCD11Ka.nrJ Canavro.'.DM� \� rCD]IPbasa CemxmfD �I �p \\ 4;.Dtlatn.cy Co.�.�aefDorol J J300 O P] IPimem rXUa.v OClr =1 Ela 9DD -i lPlaeee DH�Dclral O rOD11�ec'pf�0ex11 �g J a90L ?. �. ■ PIID -t lPta.a+acymfa Daryl 9 ■ Pa Pi19t�.nrJa�uld dbryl ■ Pa Ol l�.m.wa�mlc+DOryl ■ MIDKIP.maefN�alad Drvdl » l/ ■ 9a0 -S lPmar ns- tlurmD�:�l bt ad9 . PCA <19L ed is:a.Dmryl YmxrM a t lsw9++DeC -ne Unal A-D IAM— M.—Dw -_-11 ,� •d1. '001 100f � Parcdla )w x .� 7119 dot x /lata711a/D ]asf 330 Fist Yw�r.+Aearf rLb.a9im A. PID: 2902824340025 3201 69th St W�, Edina, MN 55435 '� N 'umr d ,q 'i RATIUE VLILMEIR COMPANIES VINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Intended Use of the Property Velmeir Companies History Velmeir Companies and its client, CVS Pharmacy, have entered into a ground lease with Fork Place West, LLC for the site known as 6905 Fork Avenue South. It is the intention of Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy to construct a 13,000 square foot retail store, with a drive through facility, on this site. The development would also include 90 customer parking stalls and a loading/unloading lane at the rear of the store. Velmeir Companies is requesting an upgraded curb cut on York Avenue, a new curb cut on West 69th Street [both of which would be right tuna in -right turn out uses] and a modification of the full access curb cut presently existing on West 69th Street. velrineir Companies is a Michigan corporation with offices also located in Florida, Washington, DC in addition to its Minnesota office located at 7201 West 78th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota. The company has been in the development business for approximately 10 years. It is'the-preferred developer for CVS Pharmacy in the State of Minnesota and has constructed approximately 35 stores in the greater Twin Cities. area. In addition, it has constructed CVS sites, and other developments, in a number of states. - j„ VELlO'IJEIR COMPANIES EXPLANATION OF PLANNED, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT MODIFICATIONS Velmeir Companies, the Proponent, is proposing to develop the site identified as 6905 York Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, as a full service CVS Pharmacy store. The site is presently undeveloped. Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy have entered into, a ground lease with the property owner, York Place West, LLC. The entire site encompasses 69,499 square. feet (1.60 acres) while the store building will occupy 13,013 square feet. The site is presently zoned as a planned commercial district (PCD -3). The zoning will remain as a PCD -3 site. The site is subject to a developer's agreement dated August 27,2008 and the City of Edina's Resolution No. 2008 -55. This Resolution sets forth a. number of conditions which must be met by the Developer. Item_ No. 11 in the Resolution prohibits a drive through facility on this site. The Proponent is requesting that the prohibition of a drive through facility be removed as a condition since all PCD sites permit a drive through facility as an accessory use under City Ordinance 850.16. The Proponent is also requesting a confirmation of the Resolution requirement that the building setbacks from both York Avenue South and West 69th Street be 20 feet rather than the standard 35 feet to achieve a "downtown" look to the site, i.e.,. the. building will sit closer to the public sidewalks. This placement of the building will also enhance the parking facilities. The Proponent has requested that Hennepin County approve the curb cut modification on York Avenue with a larger right turn in/right turn out only configuration. The Proponent is also requesting a new right turn out egress from its requested drive through facility and a modification of the existing full access curb cut at the rear of the site which also services the apartment building. The Proponent is providing for the handling of the storm water runoff from the. site via a development at the rear of the site. Parking will be provided by 90 stalls. The City's ordinance calls for 80 stalls. These stalls will be larger than the required minimum size. In summary, the Proponent.is requesting: 1. the removal of the restriction against a drive through facility; 2. the confirmation of the variance set forth in Resolution 2008 -55 which provided that the building pad would be set back 20 feet from Fork Avenue South and West 69th Street rather than the usual 35 feet; 3. the development of a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on West 69th Street); �i l 1 VE)LMEIR COMPANIES EXPLANATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTS Velmeir Companies, the Proponent, is proposing to develop the site identified as 6905 York Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, as a full service CVS Pharmacy store. The site is presently undeveloped. Velmeir Companies and CVS Pharmacy-have entered into a ground lease with the property owner, York Place We. st,..LLC. The entire site encompasses 69,499 square feet (1.60 acres) while the store building will occupy 13,013 square feet. The site is presently zoned as a planned commercial district- (P�CD -3). The zoning will remain.as.a PCD -3 site_- . . The site is subject to a developer's agreement dated August 27, 2008 and the City of Edina's Resolution No. 2008 -55. This Resolution sets forth a number of conditions which must be met by the Developer. Item No. 11 in the Resolution prohibits a drive through facility on this site. The Proponent is requesting that the prohibition of a, drive through facility be removed as a condition since all PCD sites permit a drive through facility as an accessory use under City Ordinance 850.1.6. The Proponent is also requesting -a confirmation of the Resolution requirement that the building setbacks from both York Avenue South and West 69th Street be 20 feet rather than the standard 35 feet to achieve a "downtown" look to the site; i.e., the building will sit closer to the ,public sidewalks. This placement of the building will also enhance the parking facilities. The Proponent has requested that Hennepin County permit it to improve . cut on York Avenue with a larger right turn in/right turn out only configure Proponent is also requesting a new -right turn out egress from its requested d v facility and a modification of the existing full access curb cut at the rear of th also services the apartment building. �E 1� - The Proponent is providing for the handling of the storm water p c site via a developmennt at the rear of the site. Parking will be provided by 90 stalls. The City's ordinance calls f These stalls will be larger than the required minimum size. .w kom the In summary, the Proponent is requesting: 1. the removal of the restriction against a drive through facility; 2. the confirmation of the variance set forth in Resolution 2008 -55 which provided that the building pad would be set back 20. feet from York Avenue South and West 69th Street rather than the usual 35 feet; 3. the development of a new right turn out curb cut and a modification of the full access curb cut (both on West 69th Street); i 1 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The proposed Variance gill; YES NO SEE STATEMENT ATTACHED Relieve an undue hardship which was not 0 ❑ self - imposed or a mere inconvenience: Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applica.ble to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. r _ ❑XX I ❑ 2 V1EgLM EIR COMPANIES VARIANCE APPLICATION The following responses are provided in explanation of the Minnesota Statutes and City of Edina Ordinance requirements regarding variance requests: The Proposed Variances will relieve an undo, e,hardship which were not self-imposed or a mere inconvenience. Resolution 2008 -55, adopted on June 17, 2008, in Section 3 thereof; imposed Condition #11 on the property, namely that there shall be no drive- through window, access for any retail building developed on the site. Edina Ordinance 850.16 (Planned Commercial Districts) in subdivision 7 permits drive. through facilities in a PCD -1 site and, in subdivision 9 all accessory uses permitted in PCD -1 sites are also permitted uses in PCD -3 sites. The restriction in Resolution 2008 -55 was imposed upon the site by the City of Edina to "control" the use of the site until such time as an actual. development proposal was presented to the,City. The Proponent requests that a variance be granted to permit the construction of a drive through. facility in accordance with the plans presented herein. Resolution 2008 -55 also modified the retail building setbacks from. both York Avenue South and West 69th Street from 35 feet. to 20 feet to provide an active streetscape appearance for the site. These reduced setbacks need to be maintained in the current proposal because they will enhance the location of the parking stalls as well as enhancing the traffic flow through the site. The proposed traffic pattern plarnled for the site will direct the majority of the automobiles visiting the site to exit onto West 69th Street, thus relieving some of the automobile pressure currently seen on York Avenue South. The Proposed Variances will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning. district. As stated above, the drive through facility variance will- remove the restriction against drive through facilities on this site and provide treatment for this-site which is comparable with other sites in a -PCD -3 setting. The- no. dification_ ofthe -normaLsetb -ack�esluirrements will provide P_?Ikin,& close to the store front in a manner comparable to on- street parking in front of stores. The Proposed Variances will preserve a substantial property right posses other Property in the vicinity and zoning district. The drive through facilities variance being requested will the same property right found in other PCD sites within the City-of 1 (C �ar die this sitbtWith s \ w T� The Proposed Variances will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The proposed variances are not materially detrimental to the public welfare nor are they injurious to other property. These proposed variances will enhance the_ building's entrance to both York Avenue south and West 69th Street. By providing a "downtown" look to the development, the variances will actually permit the Proponent to improve the look to the public at the intersection. The proposed variances really have no impact upon other property located in the vicinity or zoning district. PEDESTRIAN EXHIBIT �PEDESTRIAN EXHIBIT hM ph&) RIGHT CS52767 C r2 SEC -EC 69TH STREET W H STREET AND AND YORK AVENUE S YORK AVENUE E_ VELMEIR ASSOCIATES 1'. .7 PEDESTRIAN EXHIBIT �PEDESTRIAN EXHIBIT C) 00 NORR VELMEIR COMPANIES - �j•+� EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE O .n ■. _ � ®us w nm mo s �p R p ww nrorr� a.,e a � M n W E S ELEVATION - YORK AVENUE SOUTH uE. -0- /P-ji arm.—.V 11—, - , C'r a:, SOUTH ELEVATION 4- SCALE: W-1'—C" LEGEND 0 WI -o z r-i W ot.00 00 COMPANIES i f ,l. r- I .. J , w _J T C T �` l i 1 0 -i1NN5 . I� i¢r r wto{ ;YAMPO SILOIIm ,p10RCIC PROPO� WALK C WALK a -iao i k YA101 1 NORTIi 20 40 I SCALE IN FEET CA UEFME ao �V — _._i__.. SAxart Pi YFFf AND PAMC PAYO0IT STYE PLAN ■ CG t� - - - — - — - — _ — - — - •} fir•- - •,Y' I _ ++ N GENERAL NOTES 'O e -� - -- � -J- i �� r. tnxelmaEad [Iwepmr.rea�en[ +oevl...[ Or R / m PepNdbllvwbA®dbN �d ®r0 jj�e. .� mwl rya n• *� ,�. } .,1 >�bP.vebnPle LPCelbn / b �:� udmyw.d UlLlke Pm UlbiLr � / bwp tlm [gd[OINA EIOO ENTRANCE i e Q^+9 tlaN arba+ hePdvu damyOvagnbb Yll YORK AVENUE SOUTH C -, Ywbs (Iw) SEC - - BY• [ (nP[17/•/dS NO S]R in .bb JJ i ,� ! dd j I IABb[wwtlwL eom[welmdr �dmbw ll.wRM1 ae!e.y ^sloe La. EeE w..iv b. WEST 69TH STREET O rd — . •i' •ArTT� - Rbn.BiB.I b, y 7.y 0:tl nbwd•mm.i.n cvs l3 [vnJ op - .er° > " +•' *• "4 a s• vl'D � M.fes :s) [vsMOF 10M i e[n. v..l[m u.m a.b.,.:. a.be. [wlm..l •- ph ,!` 7 B• NP—!h Pe. CI I• mv[Ib.m6clllry•PgmaYl.fNY N'� N[NM W .YN SawP nwe Y _ —I— — I —�-R -- 'I 1- �I -1 —I PB'b. MwdmbnOW en wbtleetl )uMHhLL ^T °S�d— =a` =S= a pr• .o.lmw wm[e lP.. eaNl.r[mwvvbasd . w , I ,.P r •.'�°1♦ " •�• .s•' - .•/ Ne s7 T3'c .utw '� �_ -- ..Mw brY.mwP®...E�•.[.vrmu. ,+} �� .. � 1,- b.awd.bw ebRPVe••bn.9.a mNb.rl.•wmNr ., l6• va sAN s I e� /�y���_ ..+' e. �v -: : .•,'ri � �. e .' acv w[.n.. +•Pn qlY A•-Buxl• •� i L lb N I. JO , } vnka • I '1 G m ♦ L; � sw— .a wOr " v vvva w f Urf" ll C 'r Pn Oec -678' ,, \ _ p y,vpe f UrzV n 4a v Y r! Pn i sPuez ' - -- �'� -7— ' - -R , ' +„ » . •' O.anPPi^'a b c sa �w w[m./. a l[. avdulw•. ad�..mneu•.•..r V yFLE \ ' --B• P5MM -511 - rL COMPANIES R-B".5 1 •' 1 1= •�gaY.o - -�y -- a. erav/ � � *. -- j � ' 'TLJrs^[�•.. 1 a. Y[ww..ISaer�.�Sabd.s�L..am . w> \ r PswRr�r_. -' ' Is•fx.• + bolMwln lYU md�. traw. b..e.ydev _ +rxv.ao�. `f � l ,tr'� - -. + Rrr° �� ° I Fb'-rs•RCP I,�P,r.rw.LRbe. Ix- RCP . °I "ill sTa e. to.rel..Lmwa.dd..w . abnw as 9' ! a;} > » Ill -em, a.+.bv.ewmvabyl�i.ASa1@. ASSOG�ATE$ _ / I'e• O' a L. %A, » 1 ' ` d� cb ..I �' M. -(was [ -M L Auden. w.Ln[mwd mxhYbbn•tlu.sdlwilm vr. . am..•PeaaePSn...ev�eeb ®RSSd d'+•••P 9 4 +, n>Iess]) Pwhwamma.dkm.daeordmNA I a ..,•' .V+. .• ` m.ps �! _a1�^'N 77. 4uT�Q VWAETIO TM S.iACEQ wNUR °[TOP�s 9[1Fµ. aB ll- APV.m:.Nb LP[Pnen ,.+ I -•, +} ". • i i +_ ITR m..atx.q.) enqumwNa rou AU a[wm[n er uw to - -- \ OI UMe.�euntl UlPllin • 1 fp '' %I- �.+ P�� NOUESCOP.aa PECEAPRCA1LAl YA5T e0 �= ' ••'P" U1011Y C—PPny HOURS IN AOVAN[F AT 6SIpNAID1 �- --g. Uw) •• Tract A '> _ E g --A_ sruN ApP.P[MPIe LvcPlbm 1 b fl•M1 - I _ ,a R '• 1 a ♦ \ •4,,} Unaa.wB...InNl.albn' °�' ♦, t Y 8-1177.. II w L '9 .. p.. vw.:_ an•I f l•- 3- .. -- n 1 `I Ida m..BSS.a a E I I a .675.5' .Ap .E a 85,1.5 • • I unewPwma rbn OPIC cm f' �v - APB Z B — > I .\ Y • >:i_.i_.._.._.._ �_.._.._.._. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. _.....�::_, . ` .._.. ....._.._.._..t . _ ._.._.._.. — \ I _ Yn1 Lw %tlertrM A[[mi CmY Pn Ox NP aSxyaJO � � - -- `,• end �•'°} , - -'% ! � — `I . • }.;� + _— - lbe �� p'IA.'� — -EvN LAte PC J.acl — 12a / a • +• :'•L.b —1, Antl Wlln• ,tP `•> ` .�•y _ aY3 ''j • ,•• / ' _" m�We.l�m —u�m ___. -. .:: .: ___ »e- nau_... a- s0' -' _ _ • n' - OL ��'__� \ 1 — N895a'15i- Lvl Will NI + iP'p W - - -... P-.- M snr PNmbbi - j SURVEY LEGEND ;- 1 o e.me....ma — m9ww N art .uvS LYVw. yN NI P — .+— IFaA9bPm rvela ry f 1>ar — . —wmuew 9a� .. vv. 0m — ._ —�qpb .0[rleFV g vr• NORT11 a m,9r� — ��woPSawAm l.n[c y PN•c — 0� X20 4�0 • .mm Nvnm —�- uv .[c — s•'•'I � IN FEET 1 � --•. -® EXISTING CONDITIONS m e oss .sm PLAN m. w�ic Gopher State One Call �� luAa I� w ,aa aaw o •crlw.9 w .gi:: [w.00B Pa[ Loucks Project No 06416 b mL- a rmr NarAmn a[ry _ C1 -1 ••5P RIGHT ENTRANa B YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET cvS CS 0 51767 --ST.H R-578.1 CYSSMRE.S76B -.1862.91 Er" or EIW . . . . . . . . . . . 4-- F,1 -1- ,.Cp SAN 3 VELMEEIR a COMPANIES -T 3 • k A ASSOCIATES .z II- 6u Cv III C - t APR Z 3 200 4 r -65&� Nuirm f9 to 40 Sclum IN . . . . . . . . . . . "MOR . . . . . . . . . . . el .KM M W Gopher State One Call . . . . . . . ...... ...... . ........ ....... ... .... . Z. . . . . . . . .. .......... SURVEY LEGEND . it O mm 0 DEMOLITION NOTES vvy 01no ee DEMOLITION SYMBOLS IMNST"TIM UNIT LIK T-- ft U71LI71CS DEMOLITION b, PLAN �:, ,,h. -1-1 0- -.= - b. ne 1. -d . S Tamil 311-1— Loucks Project No 06416 7. —1. -d -Al 0111— AN. W110 C1 -2 SrrE PLAN rENERAL NOTES L � W, � nu ���r�a .• en a LZS� .. b.mr....r... e•er� . -- rb� �� �us ub.•au 1r��rbrY�.l M bi.L'•r.7 r bY� bn. � w w •� rw n..l�n/uvr w 41e...L . r � vL.wl a rr.J b.dbrrw.r�Vr rfs •W dd rFw � • .Mrs ..•Ir. w r..�wn. r I� � K Ir w 4av ..L .a,`.rY. a by rx. w A. ww�r r Lvr irs nw r✓M �ti r r•� bra r Mr w.rrW wr.4M�w� wee r.L~jm r Nr ®. 4/. SW .tlr Pb rV• Prp O M ER OP PM[WG STALLS WNIIP. ROW • Q n0 � am i n R q�� 0 E�M� w m Gopher State One Call laa ma."'�mo-n °gin e 7 WR ®a... - .mv4CE EEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET cvs cs E 67757 M STORE ES7RR MOM TORU MNNTPNcmRm.MN VELMEIR COMPANIES • ASSOCIATES c— w sr IA0 m SITE PLAN Loucks Project No 06416 C2 -1 e' • �rb r � .c +'� l •`�1 ..Y I: a. CCU i% - as Gopher State One Call Norm i' -� o eo 40 oM 3 I y u •(RRx.R) SCALE IN PST Rv ..vo.. oa ssmw O • Iao oC■ may 'LT.DS Re Rlv.. 9 -15• Rro _ m ■ 5EYR 1 Rb..e781 Inw( X -w) 'EL5 (8sae E -w) ,_ brv(65R.7) .IX _- Yl w.R77.7 .RS..8 .87x.1.) 2. °_- b . SIYM RYn.R7).. s _ YX = _r � n854 GRADING. DRAINAGE i EROSION CONTROL NOTES CVSD AUWW MONT ENTRANCE SEC YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET Eve a E snu CYS STORE 9WAR ; RADING & DRAINAGE PIA) oucks Project No 06416 0 -1 O 1 I ST 897H STREET - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - J ' r6 , •'6'1 1 TYPE 13 R6 013 1 1 6 :1 I '.1 1 ST,U.S PROMED-1.1 uro,� 6 irlwo" !!rwlwlfp amni niu... � iR Irr!lr�rac!lr�il �rrlrwll w!!leur �Iwlrlrlr Enlurlr� luwwlrr �Nl HIM! 0 20 40 ROM] SCALE IN FEET Gopher State One Cal I THE CONTRACTOR SMLL BF RESFONSIRLE FOR CALLING FOR tocATIONS OF ALL OxSTING UIILIT15. 7H SHALL LTJOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THLIR SLRWCL AND /OR RLLOCATON OF LINLS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHLR STATE ONE CALL AT 651AS.AWl AT LEAST AR HOURS IN ADVANCE MR TIE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNOLRCACQ -- WWFS.CABLES.CONDUITS. 'IM FAANLl LL vAlvLS OR OTHLR 6LWRO STRUCTURES REFORL OIGONG. THE CONTRACTOR Shill WAR M RLNACE THE MOVE WHEN OAAUGEO OUWNG CONSTRUC WN AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SIT FENLE REOURED uAINTENANCG wr a E FT1 m Fcyl="Al" "� w11i�'m yT c RL11wm .nc H Nv° _LJ 1 a T lmmw MA .,QlriiiE�6�66�� _LJ 1 a T lmmw WM/i{�. N ; (Tl'FALA ii uyW N:,Mn wvu. •alts ° ,R Plt W ,away a NRRN.IILT a �W"'�''� C LIED KHT to TRANCE SR YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET CVs LS 151161 LVs5MRERsIw CITY OF EUINA VELMEIR COMPANIEr • ASSOCIATES vN snw- m L., 1 EROSION CONTROL PUN (SWPPP) Loucks Project® C3 -2 mm,up n°aa m --- -- .r.I• RAa,.oe .nmN- �^dlw 1 � -- k r,'.,'°rw. °I,. «wn n`1 R. m �; m°FN, FoFn m ma svu,°m 1 - j a fi �� ° m45R.N ai ors °°mra•I V` •� a .w m •" 1� 1 I I� I.n• '�" cvremn m.e'�mr ®c'�mLL OR �'pl swe me�®�cmrn 1I - A. �' .. r4 NX • o.m Nmam le. A Tmma a «. mO"IR�•F°,w"YCw.'°d 3 4 2' WM/i{�. N ; (Tl'FALA ii uyW N:,Mn wvu. •alts ° ,R Plt W ,away a NRRN.IILT a �W"'�''� C LIED KHT to TRANCE SR YORK AVENUE SOUTH WEST 69TH STREET CVs LS 151161 LVs5MRERsIw CITY OF EUINA VELMEIR COMPANIEr • ASSOCIATES vN snw- m L., 1 EROSION CONTROL PUN (SWPPP) Loucks Project® C3 -2 j ST 697H STREET — - - - -0i a - - - -- - -- - — - -- - - -- -- JIM I Pin W u .rrtw - I TYP A - 17.013 sl. 96' IO' X 177' -6' 80 TALLS REQUIRED 90 TALLS PROVIDED rFE-97&W I w- — inAw .�.o i Curt / � .•� eu umw � \r�� R'm•aTB.I O °� B- wolmrab P. C11, A. -Built r RCP —no.— — — — m•�aTio j I -- - -- IApP o 4rola leeRlion o1 T �� ----- -- ` Una..gro Id blatrolbn 115 - •1- � �Z -1 � RV s — 2 RYn MI b (aR10 N -W) R- � Run. aYT.J �- -E bva9la RvuaTail� {11n J — _ Un V none bfalrel j I j - -P-. 55TYN Inr. an.. i I r- In. -M&C _ .- i j51— . _.. e.. e. Vm{ NORTH o IN 1D 6CA181 _ ' I- -- rmrr -an I 1 I 1 � L Q� 1 P 1 i CVS� AODOW MIT ENTRANCE 5,c YORK AVENUE SOUTH ao WEST 69TH STREET CvsaRs:nr CV9n E.5Tw1 OIYOFro NFNWN coum, w VELMEIR COMPANIES 1 ASSOCIATES UIRITY PUN GENERAL NOTES — M O. P.R.Wr rr97.YVr� r.. Yrw.1�. • w i'e��i rrv� r r r.�l P M9 v�'�r. Wlw• w.�w�.+r� sie r�r ..�:w r..ur..r+_Ne.rr � Ucr: Y INIIIa _r, ra ......... r fro• '�:..;" — a ..r...r....1 w.r••.I.rAtY n ..r.r...• r.. ss... r. uv oar. n..[ a.'.'...._r: r .......an. n.....�..., na.n .. UTILITY �..r, ..r..........., +. • ~ o. ar Iw•.•. r�.o.� r u.s.w lau�4 � PLAN dl w"'�. roN...t rire�0... :•.rw- .u°i1...1sa �'"[.r Loucks Projed No UG41G C4 -1 .1 z MEZZANINE FLOOR - PLAN® F-1P IN - 1• -r STORE AREA CALCULATIONS r xQA Tmu' ro � xcA �LW v. ntR mLt pNwmr .•e Anl®7 1 N zr. IOIDx6 x%A rltVExL /mN x@N.W WA 7HRU � L�►��� ' i � �'�xq• ww•wr.�wwQUE 3 —_ aIl_Iw•r gym. ® ® ® ®r�7�v ®�n�,�»� ® ®1 xxx COSMETIC VERSIONS: PANTM[NT• 'fTCYT ONLYI - ® ®I ®7� III w ._.E.. S+ 1 I. i NSA I' 1111 w � � - x'� AwA..xNL _Nx xR [axc xrw NIA _ �� Ul % 47�j�� I����I�oroE��w .� Yt �. ��wwC'7waw�0E - umo� w • ��O �I ] � 11' I.II �'x 1-I PHABMACT NOTE ■we�.en10 m w Mi r xr u Itj pI�w� ��j`�!`°- f1 � �wwwE�E��aw�o��9 II�w�wanwl�Il�•UE -J:�� m�ll�c© N/A fe 'i 1.95 � rYGTI =�wlh � • 11 it 11 'III NOIxIN NO j in Dd 'D`r� w a1 w NSAN /A IrRwr/IWI xxA � N g 1 �I — � A.0 reTE00RT AUDITIONS +Naxnnmu W-m _® __� m - 11 -rUl Dmrev "'^' + ++ n ex n+ D IeYOUT COURDINATOR �N/m xQw^ .mCn +-m npQ x 71 COIL E PS- PEPS OL- OLACEAU .onLr .PVrua.rw ISO R'u'° el+ fQr-@1®I A91 WS Rq al mm¢ aM Q m nmQ In¢IW NrI i1 mix¢ Imua W1W• 6 rw M Imm�xu4 nxrum ®WWQIeQ WQ ®O� 11 YN. wMLeR lal EM �U, Irf ®OlLrn9[OC �TNaQ _®WWnD nr_Y JOB T nx lUl E A� Y r -Y -Y `^o/ . T NE Q ®W u�uNU�"•Ir uR 1f OEARwQ - De z MEZZANINE FLOOR - PLAN® F-1P IN - 1• -r STORE AREA CALCULATIONS r xQA Tmu' ro � xcA �LW v. ntR mLt pNwmr .•e Anl®7 1 N zr. IOIDx6 x%A rltVExL /mN x@N.W WA 7HRU b v v . u T FLOOR PLAN ® Agana mu COMPANY NAJE'"'o CONTACT NA-- d PI CW:IAa RNAL•111171 CONTACT EMAIUJMaPx i is '_1,157 N/" �I��PIil�6�J - u,AA.. TYPE A- MO461KFWUI - SAC 'I AVE nQa• SM 0. AEST - Mt YN GEAT1RN91 7, DEM.OPFA: imo•n MA YPE LOZI VELM EIR C O A P A N I E S w1Rl+QxT N RTYfMr - - . CONSULTANT: . SEAL• IBM- ISSUES! xnlmmQ*a muvoQC: w�awTa mm� nAm Em xc wm xm w an a uLamA ISSUES' 04- 20 -201O a q .A VM - Lys MANAGER N.BESUDEN 4 •/3�C� � MA _ ROLSTNEW . l�l/ F ! 11 -D3 -3008 P VV�' ,p§' +T C531767 �n PRELIMINARY:.' MERCHANDISE PLAN' PLAN' JEEOGAT sm M.m . LL19N CODONIS - NOT RELEASED FM WNSTRUCNON � L�►��� ' i � �'�xq• ww•wr.�wwQUE 3 —_ aIl_Iw•r gym. ® ® ® ®r�7�v ®�n�,�»� ® ®1 ®cv- ® ®I ®7� III w ._.E.. - - • 1 I. i . I' 1111 w � � V. _ �� I����I�oroE��w .� Yt �. ��wwC'7waw�0E � , •y.. ,', ._cam • ��O �I ] � 11' I.II s:�lll •c:.�. ■we�.en10 1�h71�`�iaal�, u Itj pI�w� ��j`�!`°- f1 � �wwwE�E��aw�o��9 II�w�wanwl�Il�•UE -J:�� m�ll�c© lu � �• � oi�fpl�. fe 'i n u � =�wlh � • 11 it 11 'III 0._wwwl�ww.wwlu j in Dd 'D`r� b v v . u T FLOOR PLAN ® Agana mu COMPANY NAJE'"'o CONTACT NA-- d PI CW:IAa RNAL•111171 CONTACT EMAIUJMaPx i is '_1,157 N/" �I��PIil�6�J - u,AA.. TYPE A- MO461KFWUI - SAC 'I AVE nQa• SM 0. AEST - Mt YN GEAT1RN91 7, DEM.OPFA: imo•n MA YPE LOZI VELM EIR C O A P A N I E S w1Rl+QxT N RTYfMr - - . CONSULTANT: . SEAL• IBM- ISSUES! xnlmmQ*a muvoQC: w�awTa mm� nAm Em xc wm xm w an a uLamA ISSUES' 04- 20 -201O a q .A VM - Lys MANAGER N.BESUDEN 4 •/3�C� � MA _ ROLSTNEW . l�l/ F ! 11 -D3 -3008 P VV�' ,p§' +T C531767 �n PRELIMINARY:.' MERCHANDISE PLAN' PLAN' JEEOGAT sm M.m . LL19N CODONIS - NOT RELEASED FM WNSTRUCNON RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -55 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 3101 -3201 WEST 69TH STREET .w i ea City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1.' BACKGROUND. 1.01 DJR Architects on behalf of Tom Miller are is requesting a Final Development Plan with Variances' and a Conditional Use Permit to tear down the existing two office buildings on these sites and -build two buildings containing retail space that would total 18,000 square feet, and a 114 -unit, 4 -story apartment building at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. 1.02 The following Variances are requested: 1. Retail building setback variances from 35 feet to 20 feet from'York Avenue and 69th Street. 2. Apartment building setback variances from 54 feet to 35 feet from York Avenue and .69th Street. 3. A parking lot setback variance from 20 to 5 feet. 4. A building height variance from 50 feet to 54 feet for the apartments. 1.03 On May 28, 2008, the Planning Commission (4 -3 -1) recommended approval of the requests. 1.04 On June 5, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variance. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan. 2. The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it would encourage ground level retail and service uses that create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. b. The intent of the ordinance is to encourage retail uses to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment that can provide future pedestrian connections. c. The building height and, setback variances for the apartments are now required because of the recent Zoning Ordinance amendment that now requires the building height to be measured from existing grade. d 952 - 927 -8861 City Mall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWw•CItYO {2dlnd.COnl RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 2 d. The proposed height and setbacks have not changed from the original plans. However the building is now over 50 tall when measuring from existing grade rather than proposed grade, therefore, the setback requirement increases from 35 feet to 54 feet. e. If the project were built as a traditional strip mall with parking in front of the building, all setbacks would be met. f. The proposal enhances the entrance to the street. g. The variance for the parking setback would provide parking close to the store front entrances, similar to parallel or on- street parking in front of stores. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan with the requested Variances and the Conditional Use Permit to allow housing at 3101 -3201 West 69th Street. Approval is subject to the following .Conditions: Approval of the final development plan is subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan dated June 9, 2008. Grading plan dated April 28, 2008. • Landscaping plan dated June 9, 2008. Building elevations dated April 28, and June 9, 2008 • Roof plan dated June 9, 2008 2. The following must be submitted to the City before the City issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval b. - Record the resolution with the county. 3. The property owner was responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 5. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2008. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. A developer's agreement was required for public water main installation along West 69th Street and Xerxes Avenue, and for the sanitary sewer along West 69th Street. 9. Two surface parking spaces in front of the apartments must be eliminated to meet the required parking space setback from West 69th Street. 10.. Bike storage must be provided to meet City Code. 11. No drive - through window access allowed for the retail buildings. 12. Fifty percent (50 %) of the retail users in the building that faces York Avenue must have doors that have public access openings to the street. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -55 Page 3 13. The project will 'be built according to the final plans and specifications and with materials as presented at the June 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Adopted by the, city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June. 17, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mange , Cit lerk _ mes B. Hovland, ayor STATE OF.MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this / day of 12008. ity Cl9rk "A i1 A� 0 Larkn TE Miller , 1—d—P, Hoffi.m4p June 9, 2008 10C,0095.3 W is - el C 0 LO DJ R RE l�C. 1r� w � e �y MEMORANDUM Plan Review • �.�• ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: May 20, 2010 TO: Cary Teague —City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed CVS West 69th Street and York Avenue South Engineering has re- reviewed plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: © A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. © A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet — C2 -1 Site Plan: 1. Access onto York Avenue will require approval from Hennepin County. If Hennepin County allows a right -in / right -out then a sign shall be placed at the Stop Sign stating "No Access to West Bound W. 69th St,, 2. Move sidewalk along York Avenue to have a minimum of 5 -foot sodded boulevard. 3. Keep all drive isles at minimum of 24 -ft (revise drive isle just east of dumpster). Expand heavy duty pavement areas to entire perimeter drive isles. 4. Use standard City of Edina curb detail when curbs are adjacent to sidewalks. Sheet — C3 -1 Grading and Drainage Plan & C4- 1Sheet — C3 -1 Grading and Drainage Plan & C4 -1 Utility 1. Note "Private" on plan for all utilities including sanitary sewer, storm sewers and water mains. This is the first re- review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks Aar G:%Engineering\General \60 - 69 Streets13201 West 69th Street Developemen11112106 review of York Place doc Spack I RAF I!(. Z` X, ION.�ANY t 62 .Q� p it , 4 i A*qWf x• 66m Uii I n l i - F Warm r. NEBM9- p � p i 1'to L r W7M 91 p J. � 17 3 N T" 1 7!A 77 < +u 9+ x � Traffic Impact Study CVS Pharmacy Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me __ pr iindeEmy diLe�� supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: Mic ael P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: May 14,201 Ir 1? �aah raNr � r all wrA +�an_ < si0 i .Q� p it , 4 i A*qWf x• 66m Uii I n l i - F Warm r. NEBM9- p � p i 1'to L r W7M 91 p J. � 17 3 N T" 1 7!A 77 < +u 9+ x � Traffic Impact Study CVS Pharmacy Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me __ pr iindeEmy diLe�� supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: Mic ael P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: May 14,201 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary ...................... .................. .... _. 1 2. Proposed Development .............................. ..........o< ....... 3 3. Analysis of Existing Conditions ................ ............................... 6 4. Projected Traffic .......................................... .............................14 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis ......... ......... ............ 30 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ...... ............................... 35 7. Appendix ...................................................... .............................36 LIST OF FIGURES Figure2.1 - Location Map .................................................... ..............................3 Figure2.2 - Site Plan ............................................................ ..............................5 Figure 3.1 - Existing Transportation System ..................... ..............................9 Figure 3.2 - Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes .. .............................10 Figure 3.3 - Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes ... .............................11 Figure 3.4 - Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes .........................12 Figure 3.5 - Existing Daily Volumes ................................... .............................13 Figure 4.1 - Trip Distribution .............................................. .............................17 Figure 4.2 - Weekday AM Peak Hour Volume. Due to Development .............18 Figure 4.3 - Weekday PM Peak Hour Volume Due to Development .............19 Figure 4.4 - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volume Due to Development ......20 Figure 4.5 - Daily Volume Due to Development ................ .............................21 Figure 4.6 - 2011 No -Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes ......................22 Figure 4.7 - 2011 No -Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes ......................23 Figure 4.8 - 2011 No -Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes ...............24 Figure 4.9 - 2011 No -Build Daily Volumes ......................... .............................25 Figure 4.10 - 2011 Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes .........................26 Figure 4.11 - 2011 Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes ..........................27 Figure 4.12 - 2011 Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes ...................28 Figure 4.13 - 2011 Build Daily Volumes ............................. .............................29 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 - Existing Peak Hour Level of Service ( LOS)' .... ..............................8 Table 4.1 - Trip Generation ..................... .......................... .............................16 Table 5.1 - 2011 Level of Service (LOS)' ........................... .............................30 Table 5.2 - 2011 -Bu' r_Stacking_ResLltsl - -.- .- .....- .....- .........._32 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study i York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives CVS Pharmacy is proposing to build an approximately 13,013 square foot pharmacy on the vacant southeast quadrant of York Avenue South and West 69th Street in Edina, MN. The existing 114 unit York Place apartment building east of the proposed development will share the surface parking lot with CVS Pharmacy. The purpose of this report is to determine if the proposed pharmacy will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system in the near term and to recommend mitigation measures if necessary. The study objectives are: i. Document how the adjacent existing transportation system operates. ii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate in 2011 if there is no development. iii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate in 2011 with full development of the site. iv. Recommend improvements if needed. b. Executive Summary The development is proposed to contain a 13,013 square foot pharmacy with two drive -thru windows and 90 parking stalls. The eastern edge of the parking lot will have an additional 17 parking stalls owned by the York Place apartment building adjacent to the east side of the site. After the pharmacy is built, the apartment building and pharmacy will share the expanded lot and use the same driveways. The pharmacy is anticipated to be fully operational by 2011. The scope of this traffic study follows the City of Edina's Transportation Impact Analysis Initiation and Review Policy. Based on discussions with City of Edina staff, the following intersections are analyzed in this study: i. York Avenue /ExistinM northbound Right -in /Right -out - riveway south --0f -69t Street--(the dd eway is currently blocked with a fence) — Intersection 1 ii. York Avenue /69th Street — Intersection 2 iii. 69th Street/Proposed eastbound Right -out intersection which aligns closely with the Key Cadillac westbound Right - in /Right -out driveway on the north side of 69th Street — Intersection 3 iv. 69th Street/Existing full access driveways for Key Cadillac - York Place — Intersection 4 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 1 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN The principal findings of this study are: i. The York Avenue /69th Street intersection (Intersection 2) currently operates acceptably at LOS C and will continue to operate acceptably at LOS C in both the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. ii. The stop sign controlled study intersections on 69th Street (Intersections 3 & 4), as well as the CVS Pharmacy driveway on York Avenue (Intersection 1) will operate acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or better in the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. iii. The maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will not spill out of the turn lane or back up past the CVS right -out driveway (Intersection 3) on the eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac- Apartment Driveway intersection (Intersection 4). Approximately ten eastbound to westbound u -turns will be made during each peak hour at Intersection 4 and are not anticipated to cause any problems. iv. The 2011 Build study peak hour northbound to westbound queues at York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) will spill out of the left turn lane and back up past the CVS right - in /right -out driveway on the northbound approach to the intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours will be turning right onto York Avenue from the right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue /69th Street intersection (Intersection 2). This is a low volume of vehicles and is not expected to cause crash problems. Furthermore, there are opportunities to improve the signal timing plan at the York Avenue /69th Street intersection (Intersection 2) to minimize stacking while still maintaining an acceptable Level of Service at the intersection. In order to accommodate all modes of transportation after the proposed CVS Pharmacy is built, the following improvements are recommended: - - - --Install- bicycle - racks- near- the doors- of-the-b�trildiing ii. Post transit schedules in their entrances. iii. Install sidewalks as shown on the site plan. iv. Work with Hennepin County to re -time the traffic signal at the York Avenue /69th Street intersection (Intersection 2) after the CVS Pharmacy is fully operational. CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 2 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN 2. Proposed Development a. Site Location The project site is located just southeast of the Southdale Mall on the southeast quadrant of the York Avenue /69th Street intersection in Edina, MN (see Figure 2.1). Vi., 4„yr.poYf be Q r .CWT- I + '4i} ro 11 Ir � � Y p < __ Mxm ~rM1�Y Study Area' `- Proposed Site t> t.... Figure 2.1 — Location Map InZ b. Land Use and Intensity The proposed development will consist of a 13,013 square foot pharmacy building with 90 parking stalls. The CVS Pharmacy parking lot and driveways will be shared by York Place apartments. The proposed 90 stall parking lot will abut 17 existing York Place parking stalls (providing 107 stalls in the shared lot). The shared parking lot will be used by visitors at York Place, however residents will use the underground parking garage accessed from Xerxes Avenue east of the site. - - -- -Site Plan - See Figure 2.2 for the proposed site plan. The plan shows the concrete sidewalk planned along the south, west, and north borders of the site. d. Development History, Phasing, and Timing The CVS Pharmacy is planned to be built and fully operational by 2011. This proposed CVS Pharmacy is part of the York Place site 43k CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 3 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, IAN previously approved, however the 13,013. square foot pharmacy building is different than the 1.8,000 retail center originally envisioned on the site. The apartment complex is already built and approximately 75% leased. As part of the apartment project, the main access on 69th Street (Intersection 4) was redesigned (left turn lanes were extended and the medians were modified). These safety enhancements will be shared 'by the proposed CVS Pharmacy through the parking lot it will share with York Place apartments. �3a CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 4 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN Figure 2.2 ..� ack Site Plan J vj __ ......... "a _ =SIDEWALK 1 Site Plan prepared for The Velmeir Companies by Loucks Associates CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 5 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, PIN I Analysis of Existing Conditions a. Transportation Network Characteristics York Avenue is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31. It is designated as a "B" Minor Arterial and a Secondary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. York Avenue is a four - lane divided roadway with a 35 mph speed limit near the proposed site. Turn lanes are provided on York Avenue at major intersections and sidewalks are provided along both sides of the street. York Avenue is a significant bus route for Metro Transit, connecting to the Southdale Transit Center. A bus stop is located on the west side of York Avenue south of 69th Street across from the proposed site. A bus stop is also located on the east side of York Avenue north of 69th Street approximately 400 feet from the proposed site. These bus stops are served by Metro Transit Routes 6, 538, 539, and 578. 69th Street is City of Edina Municipal State Aid Route 159. It is designated as a "B" Minor Arterial and a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. 69th Street is a four -lane divided roadway with a 35 mph speed limit near the proposed site. Turn lanes are provided on 69th Street at major intersections and a sidewalk is provided on the south side of the street near the proposed site. Existing traffic control, speed limits, bus stops, sidewalks and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.1 for each study intersection. b. Traffic Volumes Based on direction from city staff, the turning movement volumes were counted at the study intersections during the following times: • Weekday a.m. peak hour (between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.) • Weekday p.m. peak hour (between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.) • Saturday midday peak hour (between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 _ _P—m-)__ The peak hour turning movement volumes were counted at the existing study intersections in March 2010 and are shown at the end of this section in Figures 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4. The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The data included in the Appendix also includes pedestrian counts, which were low during the study period (less than 25 pedestrians per crossing during the peak hour). The CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 6 A3� York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MIq existing daily traffic volumes for York Avenue and 69th Street (Intersection 2) are shown in Figure 3.5. The daily volume data is also included in the Appendix. c. Level of Service LOS An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are s assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and LOS c ` traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) _ while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). - LOS D at intersections is typically considered LOS O= Acceptable acceptable in the Twin Cities region. Individual t;g 0 * movem One or more individual movements typically ents are also assigned LOS grades. -�- ... - operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades LOS F= Unacceptable (from a signal controlled intersection in San F_ Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual movements. Source: City of San Jose, CA The LOS results for the existing study hours are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.1. The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software utilizing the City of Edina's existing model. The City of Edina's existing SYNCHROTM model was used for the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection and the driveway intersections (Intersections 1, 3 & 4) were added to the model. The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. The York Avenue /69th Street intersections (intersection 2) intersection currently operate currently operates acceptably at LOS C, however acceptably. the eastbound left turn movement operates at LOS F during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours indicating the existing signal timing plans could be improved. If the signal timing plans are optimized, the intersection CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 7 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, ION can operate at LOS C or better with each movement operating at LOS D or better (see the Appendix for optimized LOS results). The unsignalized intersections on 69th Street operate acceptably at LOS A with each approach operating at LOS A. Table 3.1 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)' 1 York Ave /CVS- (n /a - driveway is currently not Apartment Rt -in -Rt -out connected to apartment parking lot) 2 York Ave /69th St B d C M C 3 69th St/Key Cadillac Dvw A a A (a ) A (a 4 69th St/Key Cadillac — A (a) A (a) A (a) Apartment Dvwy 'The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. The second letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. d. Data Sources The sources for the data sited above are: • Turning movement counts —Traffic Data Inc. (March 2010) • Daily traffic volumes — Traffic Data Inc. (July 2009) • Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting • Site Plan — Prepared by Loucks Associates for The Velmeir Companies • SYNCHROTM Model — Existing signal timing plans and traffic volumes for intersections not studied in this report provided by City of Edina. CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 8 0 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN � ack '�j 11,1I'C + -J�i CJMYA'•` Figure 3.1 Existing Transportation System North No Scale L ' 7 O a Y L O } Intersection 2 ` 69th St pr J1 5�1-1 (Routes 6, 538, BUS 539, 578) STOP intersection 1 1!; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I la IE 1 t� 6M u m F BUS (Routes 6, 538, 9 -0STOP 539, 578) 1 d 1 x 4J r r I U v Intersection 3 x Intersection 4 LExisting Driveway e � Temporarily Closed I I 1 1 I E t: CL SIDEWALK CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 9 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN Figure 3.2 p.a Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volume North No Scale O Vf Q Y s.. O West 69th St 2 I6\ �-i ° X54 1 r 3, 44 ) *11 f 9 n m/69 � i mU LA � � C A V t a}i 00 � a Y � O Y 3 Existing Driveway Temporaril Closed 1 L0 1 too w �J 4 .v o L,o X1,0 '5J 1 r \ L „ x,06 4J 63y CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 10 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN #"�% Figure 3.3 J ack g Existin Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 'H 1 -.y .CN`/ • North No Scale West 69th St CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 11 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN p,a C k Figure 3.4 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volum North No Scale 3 O LA d Q Y L O West 69th St t u m � A � R c 9 A ro u t u 2 3 4 d E M CL Existing Driveway a Temporaril Closed 1 N Lo\ 0 t f♦ o/ Lo *A iLO rZ 93� � 6 \ I ,2\ ° � 162 4J CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 12 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN L 63\ o vtOi ti N OD N «� 67 4�� 4r39 226 1 1 55�� \6� n \ t u m � A � R c 9 A ro u t u 2 3 4 d E M CL Existing Driveway a Temporaril Closed 1 N Lo\ 0 t f♦ o/ Lo *A iLO rZ 93� � 6 \ I ,2\ ° � 162 4J CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 12 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN 3pack Figure 3.5 Existing Daily Volumes tAi� t L�r�fl'.t L T North No Scale Legend •July 2009 Daily Traffic Volumes Source: Traffic Data Inc. 4+\ CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 13 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN 4. Projected Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation study was done at six CVS Pharmacies in the Twin Cities during the Fall of 2009 to document their trip generation characteristics. A summary memorandum from that study is included in the Appendix. City staff have authorized the use of that data for the proposed pharmacy in lieu of using data from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Stn Edition. The resultant trip generation is shown in Table 4.1 at the end of this section. The directional orientation of the generated traffic was provided by city staff and is shown in Figure 4.1. This distribution pattern is consistent with the York Place Traffic Study. The traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways for each study period through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5 at the end of this section. b. Non -site Traffic Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2011 scenario by applying a 0.48% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 -year growth factor of 1.1 the Mn /DOT State Aid office has assigned to Hennepin County. Traffic generated by the 34 vacant apartments was added to these factored forecasts based on the trip generation (as shown in Table 4.1) and the trip distribution (as shown in Figure 4.1). These volumes will largely access the resident garage via it's driveway on Xerxes Avenue. Approximately 25% of the trips from these apartments are expected to use the combined CVS/York Place Apartment driveways. The�esultant 2011_No- Buildfo-recastsJos each st_ud� period are shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9 at the end of this section. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts were developed for each study period in the year 2011 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development (as shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5) to the 2011 No -Build volumes (as shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9). The CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 14 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN No -Build volumes at the site driveways were adjusted during this process to account for the apartment residents and visitors who would be able to use the access on York Avenue through the shared parking lot in the Build scenario. Based on the trip distribution pattern shown in Figure 4.1, it is assumed approximately a fifth of the apartment vehicles using the existing driveway on 69th Street (Intersection 4) will shift to the right -in /right- out intersection on York Avenue (Intersection 1) after the proposed project is constructed. The resultant 2011 Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.10 through 4.13. ` I CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 15 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN S pj'a k Table 4.1 -, __ tiP. Trip Generation DUAORAAr`V1r'kOl I1-.CTnPI: WITW nPIV;=_TWP1I PERIOD DEVELOPMENT UNITS (GFA) QUANTITY DAILY RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT Daily 1,000 GFA 13.0 87.95 50% 50% 572 572 AM Peak Hour 1,000 GFA 13.0 3.99 51% 49% 26 25 PM Peak, Hour 1,000 GFA 13.0 8.94 49% 51% 57 59 SaturdaylMid -Day Peak Hour 1 1,000 GFA 13.0 1 7.63 1 48% 1 52% 48 52 A M A MT = nl%n\ PERIOD DEVELOPMENT UNITS (GFA) QUANTITY DAILY RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT Daily Dwelling Units 34.0 6.65 50% 50% 113 113 AM Peak Hour Dwelling Units 34.0 0.51 20% 80% 3 14 PM Peak Hour Dwelling Units 34.0 0.62 65% 35% 14 7 Saturday /Mid -Day Peak Hour Dwelling Units 34.0 0.52 50% 50% 9 9 NOTES: 1. GFA = Gross Floor Area 2. Apartment trip generation rates based on "Trip Generation ", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition. 3. Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive -Thru based on trip generation rate analysis by TDI 4. A.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7 and 9 a.m.). 5. P.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4 and 6 p.m.). 6. Saturday Trip Generation is for the peak hour of generator (one hour between 11 and 1 p.m.). 7. Directional Distribution was not provided for Apartment on Saturday, but 50150 was assumed. 8. The 34 apartment dwelling units are currently vacant but assumed to be occupied by 2011 and are included in the No- Build. CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 16 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN c k � Y cc Nl "A'v 1 - Figure 401 Trip Distribution North No Scale CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study I X% Y% 17 Legend Trip Distributions for Pharmacy /Drugstore Trip Distributions for Apartment York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, ION S p,a c k �r Figure 4.2 - Weekday AM Peak Hour Volume Due to Developme. t North No Scale L1° L° 4-10 0 o a «-0 °J 1 f'' 1 0 J �1 t f♦ Ion=* ° ° 0Mw* o 0 0 N001 20.� a Y L O u A _ c 7 0 u A West 69th St U T M m x Y 2 3 4 CVS- Apartment 1 Right in /Right -out L1° L 0 o F�20 r 5►) � 20MOOT � CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 18 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN Figure 403 - Weekday PM a c Peak Hour Volume Due to Development 1HE It AEl IC 51UDY COMPANY HE - No Scale O West 69th St U m �p IL d 0 0 0 �° 10 2 +20:- to0...� M i0 N L m 40� H u U m �p C 7 d L4 � m 2 3 M i0 N L m H u NS -A artment 1 Rightin /Right -out a CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study u m 9 d Y 4 o y LO 4.40 4j 40.► . Ail 19 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN Pack �TmrltAFFIC $IUDY COMPANY Figure 4.4 - Saturday Midday Pank Wnitr Vnl,imo n, in to Bova -Innma North No Scale CVS- Apartment 1 Right in /Right -out 0 L,o I f* o 4�� /o o moo\ ,ow$ ♦1 1 i' \ \^ 0 N O O / 30 y 'Lo� o 4� 30 30 .-JIT r* CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 20 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN L ,o 4 x10 .� j �► 4r ,o of «1 1 O 20y o 0 ON wNw'' W Q V O u u A � U 4 West 69th St a Y Y 2 3 4 CVS- Apartment 1 Right in /Right -out 0 L,o I f* o 4�� /o o moo\ ,ow$ ♦1 1 i' \ \^ 0 N O O / 30 y 'Lo� o 4� 30 30 .-JIT r* CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 20 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN Figure 4.5 a 7 a rc T � Daily Volume Due to Development TRAFFIC SIVDY COMPANY North No Scale a CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 21 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN P r ack Figure 4.6 - 2011 No -Build TMk' iRA rIC STUDY COMIANY Weekday AM Peak Hour Volume NOrtl1 No Scale 0 L 35 L 10 4�60 w o 4120 r35 � �. � r5 404 201 «1 1 r' 60 =* 0 n o V1 70Z 5� d a 0 } r u ro u m � A U L V � O N West 69th St 2 3 4 �1 Existing Driveway Iemoorarily Closed 0 Lo L10 1 (80 � �v CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 22 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN �1 Existing Driveway Iemoorarily Closed 0 Lo L10 1 (80 � �v CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 22 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN s 7 d 0 West 69th St f North No Scale u � en p� U L Y m O Existing Driveway Ter - porarily Closed 1 CVS Pharmacy Traffic. Impact Study 0 0 in 0 0/ a U m 9 d / 4 d E r m a a IL 1O C275 2 i4st 23 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN 0 m o n � d.:IL-0 5 7_ 15o � +�J. 10 250 15G% .n u � en p� U L Y m O Existing Driveway Ter - porarily Closed 1 CVS Pharmacy Traffic. Impact Study 0 0 in 0 0/ a U m 9 d / 4 d E r m a a IL 1O C275 2 i4st 23 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN S Pack s S 11Af11C S1UDY COMPANY a Figure 4.8 - 2011 No -Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volum North No Scale O Vf Y L O West 69th St 7 U u 1C L 65\ 4f-5 t* r40 230 J «1 �► 65 -180 ' e U u 1C V 4f-5 101 L3j4 101 5 5 Existing Driveway Tem oraril Closet 1 0 j Lo AV- .1. 0 4=0 X185 4f-5 101 101 5 5 Y 10 141: 190 1301 M, CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 24 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN n ck a_ THE TRAMC STUDY CON.PANY Figure 4.9 2011 No -Build Daily Volumes North No Scale A53 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 25 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN R ack TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.10 - 2011 Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volum( North 1 No Scalia N CVS- Apartment 1 Rlghtin /Rightout N 1 L10-"'� 1 r► 00 M A5 L 10. �Ra 120 L 45 �5 30RZJ 0 °m a N ♦� 70 N O N / �35 40 J ♦1 f O70� ,°n o V) 70� a 0 M u =Q 9 � t West 69th St Y C 3 4 2 N CVS- Apartment 1 Rlghtin /Rightout N 1 L10-"'� 1 r► 00 M A5 41000ME.-I, 45 145 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 26 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN J L 10. �Ra 120 �5 30RZJ SSy 25� N O N / 41000ME.-I, 45 145 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 26 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN J c Figure 4011 o 201.1 Build a, c Weekday PM Peak Hour V®l"U es PU,.ETRAFFIC SIUDY COMPANY North No Scale �75 �0 n n 4J 100 � . 4r50 . us o �.. 175 15' 4j I 2DJ 3 200 195a� 0 .� 250-9* ° C U'1 150 m 55� Y E. O u u A A 9 7 9 V West 69th St Y °` 2 3 4 4 d E � = oa a a Ln U' U CVS- Apartment 1 Right in /Right -out . 10 A. 10 o N 4MM 220 m ° 315eM* A �T CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 27 York Avenue169th.Street - Edina, ANN , J ack r THE TRArIIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.12 - 2011 Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volume Build North No scale L75 LO 10 Cb r a°o -e X105 I %* 4r 50 0 0 0 40MEN1a5 �15 230 J *I 1 20 1 O85y °m ,°� 105► h ° H .00- 160 m 45m% �L r` O V A 7 tj " Q V A CO West 69th St Y OO C - 2 3 4 t a A m rr a a CVS- Apartment 1 Rightln /Rightout . L10 L1O °- ° 4*� 220 t f �' C" 160 W CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 28 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN a C THE TRAFFIC 51UDY COMPANY Figure 4.13 2011 Build Daily Volumes North No Scale CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 29 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2011 Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2011 scenario study hours are shown in Table 5.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.1 for the existing intersections plus the proposed development access configuration described in the previous sections. No improvements are programmed at any of the existing study intersections. The forecast turning movement volumes for each No -Build and Build scenario peak hour were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software with the City of Edina provided model (including the existing signal timing plans). The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — 2011 Level of Service (LOS)' (in parentheses) is the Level of Service. for the worst operating movement. The results in Table 5.1 show there is No -Build and Build scenarios, meaning will have little impact on the study Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection will operate acceptably at LOS C or better, however the eastbound left turn movement will no difference between the the proposed development intersections. The York continue to operate at LU6 r auring the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours indicating the existing signal timing plans could be improved. If the signal timing plans are optimized, the intersection can operate at LOS C or better with each movement operating at LOS D or better (see the Appendix for optimized LOS results). The unsignalized intersections on 69th Street (Intersections 1, 3, & 4) operate N� CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 30 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or better. Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2011 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and 69th Street in the No-Build. and Build scenarios. Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, a four -lane divided ,roadway with right and left turn; lanes such as York Avenue ,and 69th Stieet will operate, at LOS D If the road carves approximately 28;000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for_ LOS D on York Avenue and 69th Street in p both the 201:1 :No -Build and Build scenarios.- b. Queuing Analysis. The Level of Service results do not fully: address the impact of vehicles weaving across lanes in short distances. Problems with vehicles weaving across lanes could occur for two movements with the proposed site..plan. The first is vehicles turning eastbound out of the CVS right -out access on 69th Street (Intersection 3) and then going into the left turn lane at the 69th , Street/Key Cadillac - Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection to make a u -turn to .ultimately go westbound on 69th Street. The second is vehicles turning northbound onto York Avenue from the right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection. To determine the length of the queues on the eastbound approach of the 69th Street/Key Cadillac- Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4� intersection and the northbound approach at the York Avenue /69t Street (Intersection 2) intersection, a more detailed traffic analysis was performed with a SimTrafficTM micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.1 were used with the 2011 Build Weekday a.m., Weekday. p.m., and Saturday midday peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. These inputs for the York, Avenue corridor were transferred from the City provided SYNCHROTM model to SimTraffiJm The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 5 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number. seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 5 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. N�A CVS Pharmacy Traffic impact Study 31 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN Table 5.2 shows the stacking results for the eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac- Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection and the northbound approach to the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection in the 2011 Build Scenario. Table 5.2 — 2011 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results' Weekday .. PM Sat Midday Left 50 ft 40 ft 40 ft o (90 ft) (90 ft) (90 ft) E o 0.�e Q N M U W Thru 20 ft 90 ft loft o (120 ft) (120 ft) (120 ft) U� YD .S Oft Right 90 ft loft (120 ft) (120 ft) (120 ft) co 90 ft 120 ft2 120 fe Left (l 00 ft) (100 ft) (l 00 ft) 0 $ 0 rnZ 90 ft 170 i 100 f (D C o Thru (160 ft) (160 ft) (160 ft) Y O V 5. N 90 ft 170 ftZ 100 Right (160 ft) (160 ft) (160 ft) A..........:......•,. .. .. L.....aM.. .. .. C' 4' ..dN. fk- Frei —I. hero., 4hc m.wimnm pws�irrio« q�c�c.--. w+ ya+ iu�r�- ..i- .....a- rY..f.- �.- ...�,• --. ... - ......_...,...._.�.. .... __..... _... queue reported by SimTraffic m for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance from the previous intersection. There is room to improve the overall delay experienced at the study intersections through traffic signal retiming, but maximum queues will not be reduced significantly with optimization due to the short stacking distance between the signal and existing driveway. 1� �10 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 32 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN The results in Table 5.2 show the maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will not spill out of the turn lane or back up past the CVS right -out driveway (Intersection 3) on the eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac- Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection. According to the Transportation Research Board's Access Management Manual, "recent research, indicates that a right' turn followed by a u -turn is safer than 'a direct left turn from an access connection'." Approximately ten u -turns will be made during each peak hour and are not anticipated to cause_ any problems. The results, in Table. 5.2. show the .maximum queues during the 20 -11 Build study peak hours will spill out of the turn lane and back up past the CVS right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) on the northbound approach to the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours will be turning northbound onto York Avenue from the right -in /right- out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left- turn lane at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection. This is a low volume. of vehicles and is not expected to cause crash problems. Furtherore, there are opportunities to improve the signal timing plan at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection to minimize the stacking on York Avenue while still maintaining an acceptable LOS D or better at the intersection. c. Parking Analysis According to a trip generation study completed by Traffic Data Inc. in November 2009 for CVS "Pharmacies in the Twin Cities area, the maximum parking rate for the PM peak hour was found to be 2.54 parked stalls per 1,000 square feet of building or 33 stalls for a 13,000 square foot pharmacy. The .proposed site is required to provide 80 parking stalls per City of Edina ordinances. The site plan currently has 86 surface. , parking stalls and 4 surface handicapped stalls, meeting the City's requirements. The amount of parking provided is expected to be adequate for the site. In addition to the 90 stalls proposed;, by CVS, the York Place apartment complex will retain 17, parking stalls adjacent to its building as part of the site. The overall. parking lot on the southeast corner:of York Avenue and 69th Street will contain 107 stalls. Transportation Research Board.of the National Academies, Access Management Manual, 2003, page 204.: CVS. Pharmacy Traffic, Impact Study 33 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN d. Pedestrians & Bicycles Pedestrian volumes were relatively low for this area and should not be impacted by the nominal increase in traffic volume. Sidewalks are provided along each side of York Avenue and also along the south side of 69th Street. No segregated bicycle facilities exist adjacent to the project site, but it is recommended bicycle racks be provided at the site to promote bicycle usage along the York Avenue and 69th Street corridors. e. Crash Analyses Crash records were reviewed for the study intersections to see if there are existing safety problems that may be exacerbated by traffic from the proposed site. Crash records from 2004 through 2008 (the last five years of publicly available records) were analyzed with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (a database provided and maintained by Mn /DOT). There were no crashes associated with the three stop sign controlled study intersections during the five year period. There were 17 crashes at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection during the five year period (the individual crash reports are included in the Appendix). Of the 17 crashes over the last five years, only three of them were associated with the northbound approach to the intersection. One of the crashes had injuries, two of the crashes were indicated as possible injury crashes, and the remaining crashes were property damage only. Eight of the crashes were rear -end crashes, two were left turn related, five were right angle related, and two were undesignated by the officers. Given less than one crash per year is associated with the northbound approach, it is assumed traffic from the site's right - in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) on York Avenue will not cause a safety problem. f. Travel Demand Management Plan The intent of a Travel Demand Management Plan is to reduce the amount of- single — occupant - vehicles -- during --=h— hour —[US Pharmacy is not a large enough employer at this location to fully implement strategies such as structured carpooling and due to its retail nature it can't implement strategies such as telecommuting. However, CVS Pharmacy will work to encourage alternate modes of transportation for both its employees and patrons. York Avenue is a significant bus route for Metro Transit, connecting to the Southdale Transit Center. A bus stop is located on the west Q, CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 34 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN side of York Avenue south of 69th Street across from the proposed site. A bus stop is also located on the east side of York Avenue north of 69th Street approximately 400 feet from the proposed site. These bus stops are served by Metro Transit Routes 6, 538, 539, and 578. CVS Pharmacy will post bus schedules near its doors for its employees and patrons use. 69th Street is designated as a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. To encourage the use Edina's Bicycle Routes near the site, CVS Pharmacy will provide bicycle racks near its entrances. To encourage walking, as well as the use of nearby transit, sidewalks will be built around the site as shown in Figure 2.2. This will connect the site with sidewalks. along York Avenue and 69"h Street, which already have sidewalk systems that extend away from the site. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection currently operates acceptably at LOS C and will continue to operate acceptably at LOS C in both the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. The stop sign controlled study intersections on 69th Street (Intersections 3 & 4), as well as the CVS Pharmacy driveway on York Avenue (Intersection 1) will operate acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or better in the 2011 No -Build and Build scenarios. The maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will not spill out of the turn lane or back up past the CVS right -out driveway (Intersection 3) on the eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac - Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection. Approximately ten u- turns will be made during each peak hour and are not anticipated to cause any problems. The 2011 Build study peak hour queues at York Avenue /69th Street (Infarearfinn 91 will spill out of the turn lane and back up past the CVS right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) on the northbound approach to the intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours will be turning right onto York Avenue from the right -in /right -out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue /691h Street (Intersection 2) intersection. This is a low volume of vehicles and is not expected to cause crash problems. Furthermore, there are opportunities to improve the W CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 35 York Avenue /69th Street - Edina, MN signal timing plan at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection to minimize stacking while still maintaining an acceptable LOS D or better at the intersection. In order to accommodate all modes of transportation after the proposed CVS Pharmacy is built, the following improvements are recommended: • Install bicycle racks near the doors of the building. • Post transit schedules in their entrances. • Install the sidewalks as shown on the site plan. • Work with Hennepin County to retime the traffic signal at the York Avenue /69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection after the CVS Pharmacy is fully operational. 7. Appendix A. Traffic counts B. Trip generation memo C. Capacity analysis backup D. Queuing analysis backup E. Crash Reports A6� CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 36 York Avenue169th Street - Edina, MN t ACTION REQUESTED: Review the attached transportation impact (TIA) analysis submitted by Spack Consulting dated May 14, 2010 and review memos dated March 31, 2010 and May'7, 2010 from WSB and Associates. Staff and.WSB have. reviewed the TIA dated May 14, 2010 and believe.the development team has met the requirements of the TIA and review memos. The minor comments as outlined in WSB's May 7th memo have been addressed in the current TIA. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Transportation Impact Analysis for CVS Pharmacy at 69th and York does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system. INFORMATIONIBACKGROUND: Ttris- site -is Iaeeted -it he se tlieast- conn�r- Af_West 69th Street ansl 1Lork Avenue. The site is currently a vacant lot that has changed proposed uses of the last few years. City of Edina staff and the ETC have reviewed the following transportation studies: a November 2006: 85 unit senior apartments and 39,000 sq ft retail space ® April 2008: 114 market rate apartments and 18,000 sq ft retail space The current proposal is a modification to the April 2008 proposal by switching out the . two retail buildings (totaling 18,000 sq ft) with one building (CVS Pharmacy) totaling just over. 13,000 sq ft. The CVS pharmacy will share the surface parking lot with the current apartment building to the east. The CVS is proposed to have two drive thru windows. The development team, including Spack Consulting, first discussed this modification with City staff in July of 2009. The November 2006 and April 2008 traffic studies were . , completed by Wenck Engineering. The current traffic engineering firm is Spack Consulting. The initial meeting covered the following issues: • The Transportation Impact Analysis form was not in existence during the first two reviews and would be required for this review • How to expand upon the previous traffic studies. • Analyze trip generation of the proposed use • Integration of trips destined for the apartments via the shared parking lot • No — Build and Build Level of Services (LOS) at the intersections of - W. 69th Street and York Ave - Right In / Right Out off of York Avenue - Right Out from the drive thru window - Full shared intersection on W. 69th Street The findings of the TIA are as follows: • The final TIA report shows consistent LOS at all the studied intersections in the no -build and build scenarios, therefore not adversely affecting the adjacent street operations. • The TIA also showed some area for improvement to the signal timing at West 69th and York Avenue. This signal is owned and operated by Hennepin County. The development team will work with Hennepin County after the retail store is open to optimize the signal timing. • The site layout replaces the sidewalk along the East and North sides of the parcel. The building is also moved closer to. York Avenue to enhance pedestrian movements. • Most trips to and from the pharmacy will be via passenger vehicle. However, the store is on a major Metro Transit bus line and store will be posting bus schedules and looking for other ways to enhance mass transit. A 4ir Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina Prom: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: March 31; 2010 Be: CVS Pharmacy — 691" Street at York Avenue Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69h Street and York Avenue. This site was previously reviewed for development in late 2006 and again in 2008. The 2008 proposal included a 114 unit apartment building and 18,050 square feet of general retail space. The apartment building was constructed and is currently partially occupied. The general retail component has now been changed to the proposed CVS pharmacy. Based on our review of the previous studies and the current Traffic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. The Traffic Impact Study should document the findings of the previous studies including the Cities reviews and indicate what improvements and / or recommendations from those studies and reviews were incorporated in to the CVS proposal. 2. With the analysis of existing conditions a discussion of the available bus routes is included. A map showing the relationship of the bus routes with the bus stops and the CVS site should be included. 3. The existing Level of Service (LOS) analysis section indicates that a movement LOS of F is acceptable when the overall LOS is at a D. Unfortunately, this is occurring at the 69th Street and York Avenue intersection with an overall LOS C. The text indicates this could be mitigated with signal timing changes. The results of the timing changes should be documented, not only for the existing conditions but also for the future 2011 build and no -build conditions. This signal is controlled by Hennepin County and, therefore the County will ultimately be responsible for the final approval of any signal timing plans. A / Q 701 Xenia Avenue South - Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■Construction Suite #300 & � ;�,�, r,K. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 641 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina Prom: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: March 31; 2010 Be: CVS Pharmacy — 691" Street at York Avenue Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69h Street and York Avenue. This site was previously reviewed for development in late 2006 and again in 2008. The 2008 proposal included a 114 unit apartment building and 18,050 square feet of general retail space. The apartment building was constructed and is currently partially occupied. The general retail component has now been changed to the proposed CVS pharmacy. Based on our review of the previous studies and the current Traffic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. The Traffic Impact Study should document the findings of the previous studies including the Cities reviews and indicate what improvements and / or recommendations from those studies and reviews were incorporated in to the CVS proposal. 2. With the analysis of existing conditions a discussion of the available bus routes is included. A map showing the relationship of the bus routes with the bus stops and the CVS site should be included. 3. The existing Level of Service (LOS) analysis section indicates that a movement LOS of F is acceptable when the overall LOS is at a D. Unfortunately, this is occurring at the 69th Street and York Avenue intersection with an overall LOS C. The text indicates this could be mitigated with signal timing changes. The results of the timing changes should be documented, not only for the existing conditions but also for the future 2011 build and no -build conditions. This signal is controlled by Hennepin County and, therefore the County will ultimately be responsible for the final approval of any signal timing plans. A / Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina March 31, 2010 Page 2 of 2 4. The site traffic forecasting section and table 4.1 includes the vacant 34 apartments in the existing building. The text indicates that the No -Build volumes were adjusted to account for these trips. How were these trips assigned to the roadway network? How many of the trips were assigned through the CVS site driveways? 5. The text indicates that the pass -by trips were assumed to be 35% of the pharmacy trips. It also indicates that the City gave the direction to use this figure. That is not entirely true. City staff did agree that the pass -by percentage could be assumed because it was used in the pervious studies. However, it was actually the Cities recommendation to use no pass -by trips to represent a worst case condition. The study should include a description of pass -by trips indicating that they are just redistributed trips from the existing traffic stream. The total number of trips entering-and exiting - - - -- - - - the- s -ite- should -not be- reduee& lt- is unclear-how these trips -were- accounted - for. -A- - - - -- - - — = column in Table 4.1 showing the total trips entering and exiting the site should be included. 6. Figures 4.2 through 4.5 show the site traffic volumes. These volumes do not seem to add up to the values in Table 4.1. Please,clarify how the apartments (item 4 above) and the pass -by trips (item 5 above) are figured into these calculations. 7. The forecasted 2011 analysis indicates that there will. be approximately 1'0 vehicles on 69th Street doing u -turns and that this will not cause any problems.- How was this determined? Encouraging u -turns at a 2 -way stop controlled intersection is a safety concern. That same section indicates that there will be a weaving movement of approximately 10 vehicles from the right -in / right -out on York Avenue to the left turn lane to go west on 69`i' Street. This also is a safety concern. It should be documented how these movements will not cause any safety issues. Also, the existing crash data should be reviewed to determine if any existing conditions are showing any safety issues. 8. Should the traffic volumes for the 2011 no -build or build conditions change, the analysis should be revised. 9. The analysis indicates that there are opportunities to improve the traffic signal timing at 69`h Street and York Avenue to mitigate the deficient staking on York Avenue. The signal timing improvements should be documented as discussed in item 3 above. 10. The parking analysis should be defined better. Are the existing 13 apartments included in the 90 stalls on the CVS site? 11. The Travel Demand Management section needs to be discussed in more detail. The developer needs to determine additional ways how they will encourage use of alternative transportation modes. Providing a bike rack is just one way. Based on these comments and my review of the Traffic Impact Study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. 8% f WSB, 701 Xenia Avenue South Infrastructure ® Engineering a Planning a Construction Suite #300 axrx raeei. f„�. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant "City Engineer City. of Edina Prom: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates,:Inc. ' May 7, 2010 Vie; CVS Pharmacy - 69`h Street at York Avenue Revised Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the revised Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69' Street and York Avenue. The Traffic Impact Study dated March 25th, 2010 was reviewed and comments were outlined in a review memo dated March 31st, 2010. The developer and his consultant met with City Staff and WSB and reviewed the comments. Spack Consulting subsequently prepared the revised Traffic Impact Study dated April 10th, 2010. Based on our review of the previous study and the current revised Traffic Impact Study we offer the following comments. 1. In general the comments from the March 31St review memorandum have been addressed. 2. In the Executive Summary section under the primary findings of the study, items i and iv seem to be conflicting. One indicates an overall LOS of C for all intersections and one indicates that the LOS at 69th Street and York would be at a LOS D with the retiming This should be clarified. 3. In the Projected Traffic section under Non -site Traffic Forecasting, the 34 vacant apartments are discussed. This should be further clarified how many of those trips are actually using the CVS site access. It just indicates that the majority would use Xerxes Avenue. 4. It is still unclear how the site traffic in Figures 4.2 — 4.5 add up to that shown in Table 4.1. These values should be the same, especially now that the pass -by trips have been eliminated. C. \wSB%EAi -%CVS Rowed Rni—dx Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina May 7, 2010 Page 2 of 2 5. How does the retiming of the 69th Street and York Avenue signal impact the queuing analysis? Table 5.2 should be expanded to include these values. 6. The Crash Analysis discussion should be expanded to include a table or crash diagram outlining the location, type and severity of the crashes. 7. The Travel Demand Management section indicates that CVS will post bus schedules near its doors. This should be included as a recommended improvement in the Conclusions and Recommendations section. Based on these comments and my review of the Traffic Impact Study it can be concluded that the CVS Pharmacy proposed development will not have a significant impact on existing or future traffic operations adjacent to the site: It is therefore my recommendation that the Traffic Impact Study be approved with minor clarifications discussed above. 70 MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission o e tl� Thursday, May 20, 2010 Cn y Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street ' 1�m1u•°' Council Chambers 1998 MEMBERS PRESENT: Usha Abramovitz, Tom Bonneville, Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Jean White, Goof Workinger, Nathan Franzen. MEMBERS ABSENT: Julie Sierks STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of April 15, 2010 III. Old Business a. 66th Street Speed Study IV. New Business a. Edina's Greenstep Cities b. CVS Transportation Impact Analysis (69th and York Avenue) Assistant City Engineer Sulllivan explained that redevelopment of this site was first presented to the ETC in 2006. for 85 senior apartments and 39,000 sq. ft. of retail space; it was again presented: in 2008 for 114 apartments and 18,000 sq. ft. retail space. In 2008, the ETC approved the traffic study with the condition that the developer improve their W. 69th exit across: from the car dealership. Mr. Sullivan said the apartment building was completed in 2009 and' the improvement was made to W. 69th Street. He said CVS Pharmacy is requesting approval to develop the retail space into a 13,013 sq. ft. building with 90 parking stalls and two drive thru windows. Mr. Sullivan said in 2006 and 2008 the Transportation Impact na ysis I I�pzsI Trot in existence but is required now. He said the focus of the TIA was on W. 69th Street and York Avenue, the right in /right out off York Avenue, the right out from the drive thru windows, and full shared intersection on W. 69th Street to determine the build and no -build level of service. Mr. Sullivan said the analysis showed that the level of service would remain the same after development. He said the signal timing at W. 69th and York can be improved but this area is Hennepin County's jurisdiction and the developer will work with them to make improvements after the store is open. A-7 ( Mr. Sullivan said staff is recommending that the ETC "adopt a motion recommending that the Transportation Impact Analysis for CVS Pharmacy at 69th Street and York Avenue does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." During discussion, concerns raised included the number of parking stalls /do they need that many; is there a reciprocal parking agreement between CVS and the apartment building; reason for placing building in the northwest corner of site; drivers exiting onto W. 69th and cutting across to go north could be unsafe; installation of bike racks; traffic exiting onto York Avenue will cross to go left on W. 69th Street even if signed not to do so; and, is closing the York Avenue access an option. Addressing the concerns, Mr. Mike Spack, the traffic engineer of Spack Consulting, explained that the parking ordinance requires 80 parking stalls but no maximum; there is a shared use agreement for parking; the building was moved to the northwest corner of the site at the request of planning staff; research shows that exiting on W. 69th and dealing with traffic on. one side first and then the next side is actually safer than cutting straight across to the other side; bike racks will be installed at the entrance; and, th`e.expectation is that at least 2/3 of the traffic will exit onto W. 69th Street instead of York. Avenue. Mr., Kevin McGhee, The Velmeir Companies, said one delivery truck, on a weekly. basis, can: only enter the site from York Avenue so it is a useful access. Commissioner Nelson motioned to accept staffs recommendation "...that the Tra at i„�,paGt e,,,�„�,c traffic for CVS Pharmacy at 69th Street and York Avenue does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Franzen. Commissioner Sprague requested an amendment to the motion to include an agreement with the develo'p. e:rtIhat delivery trucks do not use W. 70th Street between TH -100 and France Avenue. The amendment was accepted. All voted aye. Absent: Schroeder,.Sierks c. Upcoming Workshops V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) VI. Public Works Small Area Guide Process Update (Commissioner Sprague) VII. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) VIII. Staff Liaison Comments a, ructilon Update IX. Commission Comments X. Adjournment. A� Q� 2 LeO L� \NrokPORp'��� lsa9 REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.D. From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director ❑ Discussion. Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning, YMCA, 7355 York Avenue — Resolution No. 2010 -104 and Rezoning Ordinance No. 850 -A -35 ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: YMCA is requesting the rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 29, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan subject to the findings and, conditions set forth in the staff report dated September 29, 2010. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nay. The Commission added a condition that the applicant consider improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space as part of their final development plan. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2010 -105 • Ordinance 850 -A -35 • Planning Commission Staff Report, September 29, 2010 Minutes from the September 29, 2010 Edina Planning Commission meeting. o Proposed Plans RESOLUTION NO. 2010-105 OLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE YMCA SITE AT 7355 YORK AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 CresaPartners on behalf of the YMCA are requesting to build an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. 1.02 The property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non- conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is also requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. A health club is a permitted use within a POD. 1.03 On August 19, 2010, the Transportation Commission and recommended approval of the traffic study subject to conditions. 1.04 On September 29, 201the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has been the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Development Plan for the YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofed i na.com 952 - 917 -88b7 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-105 Page Two 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineers memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. 5. Improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space must be considered as part of their final development plan. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on , 2010. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2010 City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 850-A35 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 7355 YORK AVENUE FROM R -1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. The subject property is hereby rezoned from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD - 1, Planned Office District based on the following findings: The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has been the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Section 2. The subject property is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 4, YORKTOWN, Hennepin County Minnesota. Section 3. The official zoning map of the City of Edina referred to and described in Section 850.06 of the Edina City Code shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the zoning map on file in the City Clerk's office shall be appropriately marked for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010 City Clerk DRAFT PC MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 2008.0012.10 Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning YMCA 7355 York Avenue, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the YMCA is requesting :a` rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet, to the'existing YMCA.. Anew 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,:100 - square feet. Planner Teague explained that the property`is currently tined R -1, low density residential, therefore, the existing- is non - conforming; a health club is;not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make thb ",use conforming. A health club is a permitted use within a POD. Planner Teague briefed,:the ;Commission that m 2009:the City�Council approved a Comprehensive Plan :amendment from LovV- Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan,,;6nd Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild a new YMCA with a two level parking ramp, an0'.q four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartmeni: building. The.YMCA teas abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to1he existing YMCA facility Planner `Teague stated th'at�in order for the applicant to construct the proposed addition, the applicaiit.must go through,a two -step process; a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning process1'and Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning approval. Planner Teague concluded; 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a-pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west- parkinglot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the'east parking lot. Appearing for the Applicant y;.. Phil Nylund, Minneapolis YMCA, Greg Hanks; Southdale YMCA, Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, Greg Fenton Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked Planner'Teague if the Comprehensive Plan was changed for this site. Planner Teague responded that the Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2008 from Low Density Residential to" ";Mixed Use: At the time. of the amendment the 4 •.'wti'.ti. YMCA was proposing a.`new building, parking rampand four -story residential apartment building. The plan before the;Commission is A;:revision-from the previous proposal. Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague if there are other zoning designations besides office. to. the request. Planner Teague said there are other zoning ciassifcations .however, office seemed to"be the best "fit ". Staunton noted that this designation would; prohibit.commercial:,` Applicant Presentation Steve Dorgan ;.Cresa Partners; presented the revised plan to the Commission, acknowledging t'hat.,the revised plan was different from the previous plan. Dorgan explained that the•.Y is very excited about the project reporting it is an expansion that includes a new leisure pool;;`fitness center, studio and upgraded systems. Dorgan reported the YMCA held a neighborhood meeting prior to this meeting. Concluding Dorgan said after preliminary approval the YMCA would like to revisit two recommendations from the Engineering Department; the recommended sidewalk and revision of the north entrance. Greg Fenton, with the aid of graphics explained the revised interior layout of the proposed addition and the parking lot. Fenton noted, as previously mentioned by Mr. Dorgan that the sidewalk and revision of the north entrance have impact. 2 Discussion A discussion ensued with Commissioners raising the following: • If implemented as per recommendations by the City Engineer how many parking spaces would be lost. • Ensure easy access to the bus stop on York Avenue • Ensure safe on -site drop -off; especially for children being dropped off by a bus — there doesn't appear to be adequate room to safely accommodate drop -off — suggest a recessed area for buses. • Will the proposed increase in square footage and the addition of new amenities increase attendance? • Where would YMCA patrons park their bikes'if4hey'rode them to the facility? • Why was POD picked and not MDD as guided by the::Comprehensive Plan? Mr. Fenton in response to comments raisedsaid if the sidewalk'is,implemented as per the recommendation by the City Engineer �1'5 +parking spaces would be lost. With graphics Mr. Fenton pointed out the issues with"_the sidewalk. Mr. Dorgan said the Y would be willing to look into �the possibility of recessing an area to accommodate buses and drop-off..' rop -off. � °Continuing, Mr. Dorgan said the majority of patrons park in the front parking lot. With regard to=_the parking of bikes Dorgan said that presently bikes are parked . on the sidewalk, adding fie would` review the site and find an area to better accor fnbdate dikes. Mr' Hanks inter)ected that'currently the bus drop -off area has been suffeient. Mr Hanks added that-bhildren :need to be signed in so individual vehicle drop -off of children is rare;,,;. Commissioner.�Brown stated -he understands there is conflict between what the applicarit;wanfs and.what the Transportation, Commission is recommending. He said there appears to be twoconditions of conflict (sidewalk from York Avenue to building front, and revision of the �rorth entrance from the west). Brown stated he wants those issues clarifed before fnal'approval. .Continuing, Brown stated he also wants to ensure that there is adequate room,in:the front of the building for buses, drop -off and bikes. In response to the question of. rezoning the site to POD Mr. Dorgan said the City's Planned Office District ;permits athletic facilities, adding it seemed the best fit. Dorgan said the ordinance as it'stands today doesn't specifically describe the YMCA, reiterating the POD zoning district allows athletic facilities. Planner Teague added that rezoning the site to POD also provides the City more review authority if redevelopment was proposed for the site. If the site was rezoned to MDD the door is opened to commercial; adding if redevelopment were to occur on the site rezoned to MDD the City would be obligated to approve any use permitted in the MDD district. Teague stated an office designation is more restricting; reiterating a POD zoning affords the City more review authority on any future redevelopment. Concluding, Teague also noted office is a permitted use in the MDD zoning district. Commissioner Forrest said she disagrees that the POD zoning is the best choice, adding in her opinion a mixed -use zoning makes more sense and conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Forrest said if rezoned to POD the City is getting farther away from their goal of providing mixed uses. Commissioner Grabiel said that while this site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed -Use, rezoning it to POD (at the request of the applicant) isn't prohibiting a future rezoning to MDD. Grabiel pointed out this is a single use site, reiterating the applicant is requesting a less dense use of the site. Public Comment Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. No one spoke to this issue. Commissioner Brown moved to close the Public Hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continued Discussion The discussion continued on the traffic /circulation iist es..on the site, including concerns on traffic flow /pedestrian safety /bus safety etc.- It was noted, that the applicant wants direction on certain reco mmendations..by the"Transportation` Commission and City Engineer ( sidewalk, access) Commissibhers commented that,the applicant has received the City Engineer and. Traffic Co Mrraission's'recommendations; the applicant has expressed they-have some issues with, those recommendation, so how does the Commission resolve these issues? Planner.Teague responded that the applicant would need to work with staff to`meet the. conditions`required by the City Engineer and Transportation Commission prior to submittal of a final development plan. Teague pointed'out this is the "preliminary" level of-the. process, adding the Commission will review fihis again for final approval' #o ensure compliance. Commissioners.did express frustration with the process between the Transportation Commission and Planning Commission. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning approval based on staff findings; and in addition to the conditions in the staff report, requested that the applicant consider the Commission comments to improve traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest stated that while she supports the proposed addition to the YMCA she believes rezoning the site to mixed use is more appropriate. 4 Commissioner Staunton said while he supports Commissioner Forrest's position on rezoning the site to MDD he supports the rezoning to office because it's a less intense use of the site. Commissioner Schroeder stated he supports the project at the preliminary level; however, for final review he would like to see more details and clarity on the plans. Ayes; Carpenter, Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Fischer. Nay; Forrest. Motion carried. a� W A. w � y (n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 29, 2010 2008 - 012.10 Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description The YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. The property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non - conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. (See location, applicant narrative and plans on pages Al —A21.) A health club is a permitted use within a POD. In 2009 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Low - Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild a new YMCA with a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The YMCA has abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to the existing YMCA facility. (See previously approved preliminary plan on page A22.) In order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step process. That process is as follows: 1. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. This application requires a three -fifths vote of the City Council. 2. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. The Final Development Plan & Rezoning process is generally the same as the Preliminary Development Plan. A three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is also required. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Yorktown Park and Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided park. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Yorkdale Townhomes and single - family homes; zoned and guided low & medium density housing. Westerly: 7500 York Senior Housing; zoned and guided high density housing. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.94 acres in size and contains a 66,800 square foot YMCA facility. (See page A3 A5.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Parking Mixed Use R -1, Single- Dwelling District Health clubs are required 6 parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. There are two racquetball courts and 63,920 square feet of other uses proposed within the YMCA. Other uses include the pools, gymnasiums, exercise areas, office space, meeting rooms, and kid's areas. Therefore, 332 parking spaces are required on the site. The plan shows there would be a total of 332 parking stalls (See page Al2.) Access /Circulation Access to the site would remain through the existing two drive entrances off York Avenue. Circulation would remain generally the same as exists today with parking areas on the east and west side of the building. The main building entrance to the YMCA would face York Avenue. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed site plan and recommends several changes. (See page A22a and A22b.) An east/west pedestrian walkway should be added from York Avenue to the building. This would be similar to the plan provided in the traffic study on page A71. This would provide a safer pedestrian connection in the front parking lot and from York Avenue. To accomplish this sidewalk, removal of parking spaces would be required. However, a proof -of- parking agreement could be utilized to ensure 2 that there would be adequate parking for the site. If parking were to become a problem in the future, additional stalls could be added. The City Engineer also suggests that the north entrance be reconfigured, and that the drive circulation in the east parking lot should be reversed. All drive aisle width and parking stall dimensions must meet minimum city standards on the final development plans. Grading /Drainage /Utilities There are no significant changes to the existing grading, drainage or utilities on the site. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A22a. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan review. Landscaping The applicant is proposing additional landscaping around the building and perimeter of the site. (See page A13.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 51 over -story trees are required. The applicant is proposing 47 over -story trees, not including four (4) Elm trees shown on the plan. Elms are not considered over -story trees by the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, four additional over - story trees must be added. This could be made a condition of approval. A full compliment of under -story trees and shrubs are proposed around the building. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan review. Building /Building Material The addition would be designed to fit in, or match with the existing building. The new building would be made of brick, metal and concrete panels. Windows would be added to the front of the building. (See renderings and building elevations on page A10.) The proposed building materials are considered acceptable by the Zoning Ordinance which requires the following: "All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: face brick; natural stone; specially designed pre -cast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction if the panel materials are any of those noted above; or glass or pre- finished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron)." "All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance." 3 Compliance Table City Standard (MDD -5) Proposed YMCA - Setbacks Front Setback — York Avenue 35 feet 200+ feet Xerxes Avenue 35 feet 100+ feet Side — South 29 feet (building height) 100+ feet Side — North 29 feet (building height) 60 feet Building Height 4- stories or 50 feet 29 feet & 1 -story Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet (Xerxes side to be adjusted) 10 feet (interior) 10 feet (interior) west lot has an existing parking area with a 5 -foot setback) Building Coverage 30% 22% Parking Stalls — Health Club Six (6) parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square feet of 332 parking stalls proposed gross floor area for all other uses. 332 spaces required PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed preliminary rezoning and development plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The YMCA has existed on the site since the early 1970's, and has fit well with the mixture of uses in the area. The rezoning would make the YMCA a conforming land use. Health Clubs are a permitted use within the POD -1, Planning Office District. Other permitted uses include office buildings, medical clinics, day care, and schools. The POD District is a less intense zoning district in regard to allowed uses, than the previously proposed PCD, Planned Commercial District, which would have allowed commercial and residential uses in addition to the YMCA. 3. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed Use. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study based on the previously proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed that document to determine if it was accurate. Both Spack and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the addition to the YMCA. (See traffic study on pages A32 —A71.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on August 19,2010, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the minutes on pages A23 A26.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Preliminary Development Plan. Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following findings: 5 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has been the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. Deadline for a City decision: December 21, 2010 0 9 9 Q �a �, City of Edina AV V 7201 21 Terktbiea Park 7]55 74" PID:3202824240002 7355 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 A� Legend House Number Labels Street Nema Labels City Llmlts Cr"K5 Lake Names Lakes Parks Zoning APO (Autem.bib Pa .q 0 t) OMoo IJM— D— .P�.nnJ D.—I ■ MDD S(Mi Dewbam..J Dmrnl ■ MDD41Mu- 0 —.-0.a 1 . PCD- I(P.... Cams.aoM O. —1 . R^0 7{P., :. Ca Ranrou�O.-1 ■ PC071Pbnea Cammvcv:DM. tI ■ PCD= IPNnnoE Corr. i10¢trx'.I O%O lPlannel :nauq.v'Omrctl ❑ POD1 IPMnnal OHm Ornnnl ❑ POD 2lPr.,.of Orr- O'tlr.nl ■ PRO I (W.—. F--l.M 0.-1 . PFD -<(Pl. —Aa .n140. —1 ■ PRO _J {PUnnsJNw4entw 0a.ctl ■ PROalPl.nnNgocf —!0. —1 .PRO S I P'm.nee geRJ.nld Omrnl ■ PSqC (PLmnoJ SVnbr Digrcll qt lSinpb Oresnp Un nl ■ A21Doukb Dwar4np Unal OgMDlq.pcna Ma yD�q.c11 Parcels 2009 Aerial Photo bx 1 ST�N6 20NfNG ,%IN I York Ave - York Ave 5 A w T J +� A• Xerxes Ave ':S YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Association Services 30 South Ninth Street nneapolis, MN 55402 2- 371 -8700 fax: 612- 371 -8716 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Expansion Project Preliminary Development Plan Review & Rezoning Dear Mr. Teague, August 27, 2010 ,v YMCA We build strong kids, strong families, strong connnunities. 1 /,Zg 30 31 �? `o ti co m PJ0 0 Please accept the following and attached information as required submittal for Preliminary Development Plan Review and Rezoning for the property owned by the Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis located at 7355 York Avenue South. Project Overview The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis ( "YMCA's is a 150 year old organization and currently operates 11facilities in the Minneapolis and greater Minneapolis area. The YMCA provides a variety of programs serving children, adults, and seniors. The YMCA is experiencing growth and needs to update their existing facility and is proposing an expansion of their building on the existing site. The proposed expansion will provide a more efficient facility for the YMCA to operate and provide programs and services to the Edina community and surrounding area. The proposed development is consistent with surrounding uses and the City of Edina's comprehensive Plan for the area. The proposed facility expansion will add 15,398 square feet to the existing facility for a new total building size of 82,100 square feet. The expanded and remodeled facility will include: • New 5,300 sf leisure pool • A 9,000 sf expansion to accommodate a new fitness center and studios Remodeling of most of the existing spaces within the existing facility Current Conditions The proposed 5.71 acre property is currently occupied by a 2 -story 68,400 square foot YMCA facility built in 1972 and contains a surface parking lot with 324 spaces. Rezoning Currently the site is zoned R -1. The YMCA proposes to rezone the parcel to POD (Planned Office District) for the purposes of expanding the current facility, but maintaining the same operation use. The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The site will include 322 parking spaces on grade per the attached site plan in the rezoning submittal. t0 YMCA 5outhdale Expansion Project Letter to Cary Teague - August 27, 2010 Site & Building Plan Review Site Preparation The site for the proposed YMCA facility expansion is located on the existing YMCA property on York Avenue South. The expansion will occur at the north end of the building. The City Fire Station, skate park, and City Park are located along the north side of the property, Xerxes is located along the east edge of the site, single and multiple family housing is located along the south side of the site. The YMCA will remain in operation during the facility expansion. Site Access and Circulation Access to the site is provided by York Avenue. Currently, there are two access drives to the site. The access drives will remain in the same locations, but the parking lot layout will be modified to accommodate the facility expansion as well as additional parking stalls. Please refer to the attached site plan. Building Heights The maximum height of the proposed facility expansion is 28 feet above finish grade. Site Coverage Per section 850.14 Subd 6.A (City of Edina Code), the total site coverage allowance for the buildings is 30% maximum. The following is a breakdown of the building coverage for the proposed development: 39,000 SF Existing YMCA footprint 15,400 SF Proposed YMCA expansion 54,400 SF Total Proposed footprint —or- 54,400/248,000 site SF = 22% Parking Per Section 850.08 Subd 1. A & 0 (City of Edina Code) the parking requirements for the YMCA a re: Six spaces per court for all racquetball, tennis, & handball courts = 12 spaces One space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. Gross square feet for all "other uses" is 58,526 sf = 293 spaces Total parking requirements per the code for the project = 305 spaces The current site plan shows a total of 332 spaces which meets the City's requirements for the proposed facility expansion. Additionally, the site is on a major bus route that provides great access to the public transit system as well as connected to major pedestrian trail systems within the City. Grading The proposed grading is similar to the existing site conditions, which slopes from West to East. The proposed expansion will maintain the current floor elevation is the facility. Drainage Storm water is proposed to be detained in underground infiltration storage tanks located beneath the rear parking lot. Page 2 of 4 6-3 YMCA Southdale Expansion Project Letter to Cary Teague -August 17, 1010 t)tlll The YMCA facility is currently served by the City of Edina water and sanitary sewer from York Avenue South and Xerxes Avenue South respectively and will continue to receive these utilities from their current locations. Water Service Adequate water service for the proposed YMCA expansion will be provided for the existing service currently providing water service to the facility from the west edge of the site. Sanitary Sewer Service There is an existing 12 -inch sanitary sewer located on Xerxes that serves the current and proposed facilities. Geotechnical A series of soil borings have been conducted on site at or near the proposed structure expansion. Landscaping A landscaping plan and planting schedule is provided with the submittal plans and meets the minimum standards of the City Code. The majority of the existing landscaping will remain. Signage Building signage is proposed for the new fagade on the West side of the building. Site signage will remain the same as it is currently. Green & Sustainable Building Systems The YMCA intends to utilize Green & Sustainable principals through the design and construction of the new facility expansion. Neighborhood Meeting A meeting with the surrounding neighbors will be conducted at the Southdale YMCA in September prior to the Planning Commission meeting. A mailing to all residents surrounding the facility will be sent to the neighbors one week prior to the meeting date. Thank you for your time and consideration with this proposal and the City's continued support of the YMCA. If you should have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612.371.8724. You may also contact our representative, Steve Dorgan, of CresaPartners listed below. Sincerely Anita Lancello Bydlon Representative: Steve Dorgan Principal, CresaPartners 80 South 81h Street, Suite 850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612.373.0287 Email: sdorgan(&cresapartners.com Page 3 of 4 nt Attachments A) Survey with Existing Conditions Plan B) Site Plan C) Floor Plans D) Proposed Building Elevations E) Landscape Plan F) Civil Plans G) Grading, Utility, & Drainage Plan H) Color Renderings of Elevations YMCA Southdale Expansion Project Letter to Cary Teague - August 27, 2010 I) Photos of Existing Site J) Building Materials Samples /Photographs Page 4 of 4 A'\ F Inn-- s EVE NEw nnou von. nvEr+uE SOU PWESt -- �r v Southdale YMCA Edina, Mimuota AR HITECTS d yw JIL O� J 0T= EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING IMAGES A5 ppeSM1SWSF.Ldwk„ WEw aE LFtsIMEEOa,wtx+wntoo�n ro,NE n r �----------=----------- 1-------- - - - - -� - - •---- - - =-•l \fir OUTLOT 0 \R �> I op U r I I 1OM� \ t Ci pi I li 00 r` ! ` r • ° -�.y� l� as .+- �' r n tiY �+ i� i � � � �.r � � ~ — � \� J . 3F _ _ °fu _ _ _ Ol 1Y1 ♦ ♦ �' 1/ 1 ° r ICJ} !� ( I� � v � > � p• �%° � � � ,,V ,' to �'� / � ,i` Lot / 1 > � i✓•, �' � s � � = � r di INC E via ! , •'�; � 1 J �r _way !r Pk r.... ...........o a 1 \ alf if if w r ` l�41 i de !1 A B • 7 LEGEND PROPOSED CURB MCI CWTER PROPOSED RET49 " MALL © PROPOSED PMOTEG STALL COURT PROPOSED MEW CMCRETE SURFACE PROPOSED WW AS: WLT SURFACE 11Y1MlAC'ORlM R®•ORITRR LT LC 0PtlVF) n MDRmT, imj r M*Mnel v R X.3 m T ROM _ r sew vLN I r INING WALL 3 %LT GENERAL NOTES: SITE PLAN .01 TOTAL NUMBER OF F]RSTING PARKMG STALLS 121. 201.06 02 TOTAL RUMBER OF STALLS AFTER ADWM 112, .01 SIZE OF EXIST& 6UILD040 19.027 SQUARE FEET. .DI SIZE OF ADORIOM 22.010 SQUARE FEET. .05 SIZE OF BIIRDM AFTER AMMON 55,219 SQUARE FEET. Scde LE Feet De NET BUIIJDMG MCRFASE 16.226 SQUARE FEET BECAUSE A PORPOR OF THE BUADMG REMODELS EXE571NG BL "M N .07 PROPOSED MET eA7+EASE M REPf1;MUS COVERAGE 11.467 SO. FE LEGEND FOR EXISTING ITEMS TC TOP OF CURB CATCH BASH —F —S CAM SEWER M TOP OF WALL 0 STORM LLMMOIL SMROAIfi SEWER CE Cf W 0 S TARP —OLE — WATRIWH SP SPNUCE Q NMAW �U.IVERi TR TREE (GEM) M WTI VALVE RETMMIUO *ALL IR YRum 0 POR m POLE —UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LOHFEAWS D CAS �+EE O UI T POLE — .s-- UMDRGRWM1 0 YARD LOW — w —FDRCE UPON C DECIDUOUS — R UTILITY LAM10lE QARDRAR O CLECTRIC TRANSFORMER —a—o--RIARLQ Q ELECTRIC DUTLET m • GAS PETER e p POSE 'D_'QR YALVE — SPOT EUCVATM]M \ CONTOURS • •Darts Ra MDRUMaT �, � 1� Di onw+LZ FATeOLG r..0 [' (UFO) a o+nOroRaw>.s R£v -B�.11 rt RUT+' Of m anr) /SEA � IY.J6Mx p M S.TZ AC 7 e , C. Q d 9 2 y a I 0 L y) e k � W so A A A REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS ONE TREE PER 40 L.F. OF LOT PERIMETER LOT PERIMETER le APPROX. 2042 LF. COMMON NAME 2042 / 40 - 51 TREES REQUIRED TREES EXISTING TREES ON SITE - 37 LANDSCAPE TREES REQUIRED = 14 1 SSC Molue 'Spring Snow' LANDSCAPE TREES PROMOED 15 2" TOTAL TREES ON SITE = 51 2 $CIA Aa« s h•emonii 'Sienna' FOR BUILDINGS OVER 24' HT. 2 -1/2" 5% OF 14 TREES: LESS THAN 2" DIA. _ .7 0 1 25% OF 14 TREES: 2.5" DIA. OR 6' HT. - 3.5 0 8 257. OF 14 TREES: 3.5" DIA. OR 8' HT. - 3.5 3 6 20% OF 14 TREES: 4.5" DIA. OR 10' HT. - 2.8 2 0 207. OF 14 TREES: 5.5" DIA. OR 12' HT. - 2.8 32 0 PLANT LIST: Site Plantings OTy. KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 512E/N..T TREES 1 SSC Molue 'Spring Snow' Sprnq Snow Crabapple 2" B @B 2 $CIA Aa« s h•emonii 'Sienna' Sienna Glen Maple 2 -1/2" BAN 2 CH G.M. occidenlais Common Hockberry 2 -1/2 B&B 4 AP Pinus nigm Austrian Pine V -0" B&B 6 BHS Picea glouco densalo Black Hile Spruce 6' -0" S&B SHRUBS 13 DWE Euonymus .lotus 'Compact,$' Dworf Winged Euonymus 5 Gd, Pot 6 AN Hyorangea aro «e .tins 'Annabeue' Annabelle Hydrangea 5 Gol. Pot 15 AWS Spnoea • Du.ad. 'Anthony Waterer Anthony Wolerer Spire. 5 GIL Pot 23 SJ —0—A -bin. 'Scandia' Scand,. Juniper 5 Gal. Pot PERENNIALS @ GRASSES 55 KFG Calarrogroslis ocutiR «a 'Kan Forester' Karl F «set« Feather Reed Gras. I Gel. Pal 39 BO Nemm «.tali$ 'Bala' Baja Doody 1 Gel. Pot 5 BYS Rud6eckia lulgido 'Gadslurm' Bl.ek -eye. S ... n I W. Pot PLANTING NOTES: C hullo enee P olel -e yw g-e m dl pant malaa of the on rc ' oo-e m. w «amee begs. - me sole of Pe ..- porting. Rap - -t pion) mat -mis Nell el- note o -e yea guarantee ­en-g -P- p -tiny. Ae pant. to be Mnneeola grown and n«d,, m -le to be nsloled as per standard AAN p-Nng proct -S. Ilse inner,- 12" iwm p -tiny . s - trees -d 6' w srr,b.. contractor .rat >ruy locations .itn al uluilie. prig to n.laiouel of p -l.. All landscaping and .od «ea. Ndl M niggled .i to an underground aprnklar. 5laking PI Ire•. wk-4. repo.di- if not Plume alter -• Nor. Wrap all sin- tn-baked Tree. -foal- lap -d bottom. Remove oy A«il I Open lap of DurlaC - tie mat -ids: remain pot on poltw plant.: 1plit -a t,, o apart peal "L Prang wants ae rw ... «y - per .lan—d .,awry pr «HCe Pmt Nell be reap - .. r« - amt - -ce arlr acceptant. al ib . «. by tr. o.rer. PI -l. ­0 be mine -tdy plant- ap- «ri.p It Bile Properly heel -m -atria, .f nete.. y. All disturoed urea. to be sodded tin ess atnerwi.e noted. sod snail be nalhern groin and rordy Highland eod, no plot god dlowed. Planting bad. la Nrube grail nave ({ oz. in.) wed Da . lobric, 4" - 6" of double eh,,ddld dart brown hcrdwood mulch and 4" verlitd (canmrdd grade) block p y edgnq. ire eoginq end' . paced -d .l..d with --ti, carve. A f'n wood me aN Nat be pro aad m al mcn min NN b. It o minim, - diameter, -6" dew, and Ndl not cane in c -loci with the trunk. See n1- 9 Datob. Retaining .pie «e not lne neoan.ibzily of the L -d. M test. Con— Pe Prated Engn.r la gob. I «atl -., matrw., I. wetir tone lar al r.ldnng .... GOPHER STATE ONE CALL and tMn�_ .grin r C iP P L'. r I� xd. H F-I i\ � I v SOUTHDALE YMCA BWBR �. rrwr sm.L $,.w aao s... r.r sa, sslm.lee• ausuvm W R .e.e:ebtl r.Ja<_ .AISM- fe.u.la ge m� m LANDSCAPE PLAN 202. LS �rr"ro xwee,,.�D.rm I l I I I I I I II I J I If)- —1 -- I � I 1 KIM L fim k I Y) m e L O l Y 3 -I q4 11 `� W �m 1 I � I _ P IFY7ER N / DID, skW6 I IGTCN 8141 / r I 1 / I I / I /I I � e7o I / I / I I / / I I �r I I I C I I I 1 I I MSGII- NNCO �a. 1 � . el I -�MI -1 �p,PM�jO -i_i ILLC LEGEND ee0 mo om Comm PPOMM nNS AM WM z lox ex Pmpo m vm amonm )) PRWCM stow moe P1OPn4L SES FOM © PROPOM SEEN" Y STFPpNO STEM FFNCE POSr e'Q•C SIPPORE PCSr . 1' O.C. eW MEDAL MEW FAIM (WOOF 3eee) mFIL7m 24C*U OVEN 111171 FABRIC e t• IBR 3 HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE VOY 110 SCALE I t � �— Jr °i FF = 970.5 I ;, li = &M.5 I SILT FURZ� VI /`III 7z2s� u nH s� ii \•,� I I r f II �` a Feu— i 1 - ,'.1 • � III III I . --` a__�, I GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN sad. t1 Fmt 201.06 GENERAL NOTES: .01 TW CWR1CM M AU COMDR ALL uWm' MIPAMM AV FINE SAO CO&dF WE9 LCGTE ALL VMAIFS MMX .02 PWYAIE) BFPOIK AMV COri51RUCtIOM 91YL BF7al .02 ALL FROSDN UNPINNED NE iFA ALL 9OI.t LM iNE BANS MUSE BE BEEN PRIOR ro Ct711MFNCOlFF/f OF C0167RI1CROM OPENATOILS AND WNfM A KO ALL ME S UIIM OM U.L WE OF O NEONo .0J WO C0F6'IR V THE wr BEON1 dl 111E SIE LML P6WIATON OF EIOSON CONTROL FACSl06 IIA4 BED1 N5PECtm AND RD APPRO" BY " CITY. CO WO C WrDfCTE Y. BEiil OR THE sfiE uMTL 7FE cOFriRLCtM IL1T 000rmrAam A PE1eJOr6NUC1tOM .0 ALL CE SM T MI ALL ALL C0161RIE.'aW SINLL BEN ACOOIDWCE eRn1 i D a EOPN AM iFE NNE lelE CNtaL NRiF1i5/m 061ACE aAMavms AAO SPEL77GTIpq CFA. sPEt>trwTnra AND 1.FODE yIECfICV1pIS CALL N mm sum MOOR GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TIIN CRY ARFA (e31) ISF0002 INIES001 701E nEE t- 800- T52 -i1BP _= 1 N CATCH BASIN mu PROTECTION O b SAYE e LEGEND X TOP 0' CURB FOR EXISITNG ITEMS on GTCN a151M —+�—STOFM Smrn O� TW TOP OP WALL Q raw MN/NOLE — •— SMRART SEMEN Cr CEDAR O SMITH MAN,IOLE I— WATCFWIN �t' SP SPRUCE 0 NYONMr � ICULNERT '♦ NO lR mr (am) M WE —E ANNC WALL WI WELCW \\ CONPCROUS TREE 0 POWER POLE a UCNr —UN RLEI10 POLE e •A10 uw1 — . —rONCE ww LECTRC o unm MAN (D `.� nEaouoos rNEY � 10 ELEC ER \ . CLCC �C0.I1,�\1q {?'1•�^r•, \7[]s��E111E CAS CLNte ems, vAl�E± { NNGRErt ♦... SPOT >�e.eNm ,le arat, . m.Ol[s r roux O marts . w —T r {wq mwlt: Nr s e�or a r DR .IANS ` .KWP+t6 �� -NOrMV �Wn n N 4lor]I�im {]! yt �� Co m +C u s•oW+ NtxtOl n+vean++ n foR d TONA Of a # & N YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis YMCA Southdale Facility Expansion & Renovations City of Edina Submittal 27 August 2010 Existing Facility Photographs Building Illustrations Proposed Material Images A 15- • BWBR Architects '1�01112930,�\ CD c� v 1 �L81gLt�L� Existing Facility Photographs Existing Entry from Northwest YMCA OF METROPOLITAN vMq—Ja wv."Lo' FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Existing Facility Photographs Existing YMCA from North Driveway YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA svuTrloALt FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Building Illustrations View from York Avenue YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Building Illustrations View from Northeast View from Northwest Act YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 �S �j \ Ln co Metal Panel & Glazing ov Proposed Material Images • to _. _ A, , W ca Metal Panel 0 e -, p6 YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Proposed Material Images M(',al Panol YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR N��:� J N co - m co N p v 8� CL 965 4C (YE 1. 2. 3. 4. 0 6 7 8 9 3 (yellow spaces) N� Ground Plan YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE BWBR ARCHITECTS September 2010 FACILITY EXPANSION 46 RENOVATIONS A3-n92 SF nrnc.Q Flnnr r0►rAn (Yo 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 21 (v, : kk I T,q YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHOALE Basement Plan FACILITY EX' •ION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITEC' 'eptember 2010 «6llrraNVUf IOR ulurs wAnlru U01TNf wAAwan Gl5 WGfASRU .ul ANY srAgNG ATurT 1 nAGrcfs A5 uff INFO uts raa rrANOND D AIW C.OSfING Ic.rANC ANO lAels.+c AD , PLACE .MV xI ID SANINT[ YYt Wllll C«MAn wolf[ n W+ AA.fIAM K—. MIK- lc -oNE ru •- nA snc. II rIAN w AAO you of iusrowl.lT fo. A,.1N.Ans nlc+a rD ,lR UW DSCA1i rM /MRCf raa. D.NNALE [run. llltlr,�rOWL .LL lll[ff IA A rl UAU A:CHT[ WA,AANTY G li SUGGISRR ANY r1ADNG MISS Yffoe Ax0 AK.FD.MN01{S li rpMrlF,l. u:Ge1G AND l.YIIWG ]eWGfxY Du.ING ATg11f. rl ACf .ACq.I �IDSATUAAIr fOM wA1N TCDAVAR MO.l1HAN SSW G •ow nA wrf P. Yl6. wuwaAWST TACTYATN IIU•i -MY c ff rI.AN MPLANTS04G « INS MOUNDED SU.G.ADE T.esroNVUU« unw.nns nloA m PO , EANUfr A.GllTif:l rOM OSAYiANA G[ FIl415. rollw.,l�uw All ANTS ND SIDES OF MING :ED 50 TENT • SRS FLUSH IADE EE Snc -S1[ SPEC SEE SPEC E TO PLAN SPEC PI id Via :E SPECS. Ul5 - SEE PEAR IMINI. LO .N SOIL - 511 SPECS. Don DF RxLAI Pwx wG f /' sea.�oo I .00e •.oe MA " ••oes e' 0 • I I I I I I I \i I I I 1rrALLTSs IS. rcYllt Ti I ••ea I •:oo � i ••0O !! o, I �I I eei ws t • �'o,01j 1 • o o °e .iQ%r . 4ii5. lr 'eeo • =L�'� PIeA:0I0IO:�IJfIOIOIC I�:0IO;0I d0f. i• A`I.�_• noloFln IOOOC p^Ijw Y, f�A`AYIIIIV: Te ,•I.o1V.V l {t:Y ww o o q. top ZY TALL Ted i-HDALE YMCA and COMMONBOND HOUSING GMA, MN BWRR AACHI E TS ]b S,. Peler Sll.n• S..tie 600 S.i., P.A MN 55HU49% 6511iLU01 ASSOCIATES Me TMMwI i���i�rl.rrrw• rr Y./ I. �A:E^ w cxD I w■ iesR i�w.rr tits melllowiiid Ina ,a�Mwrwu�ie �lL_ O/r41Ae0A1MG11•M _' fPpry ila.r�ilauuloluiw.slun a! unrl- rlNl_FFi•S�lw __ �IAI l��!NM. MMYfM1YYlt.1 i ,E.fD -- �gtrlA. j' �1 e 0 MEMORANDUM - Plan Review • � � ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ^h�uuawT�s° CITY OF EDINA DATE: September 24, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Southdale YMCA 7355 York Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and draft minutes. © A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer. This should include all stop signs, one -way signs, HC parking signs, compact parking signs, etc. O A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works and MCES. O All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet — 200.CS: 1. Revise north entrance from the west parking field to York Avenue, see attached sketch. This revision was a request of the Transportation Commision and from my review of the parking lot circulation. The revision will improve the functionality of the entrance onto York Avenue, while encouraging more use of the south entrance onto York Avenue. 2. The parking lot revision also includes a sidewalk from York Avenue to the main entrance of the building. The sidewalk should also provide a bus pad at York Avenue for Metro Transit buses. 3. Remove parking along northerly side of site for access to the skate park entrance. 4. Provide landscape islands at parking lot tree ends in easterly parking field. 5. Provide dimensions for parking in the easterly parking field to match City Code 850.08, Subd 5, Al & A2. 6. Reverse the direction of circulation in the east parking field to be counterclockwise. This is the first re- review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks Aaa� GAEngineering \General \Y Streets \7355 York Ave - YMMApproval Process \20100924 review of 7355 York Avenue South.docx _C� 9--j so \_ � y / � 1i, I ,I I 00 BIN 'Al ami 0jj7i8 cq -tOffeA-W -X CURB 1i, I ,I I 00 BIN 'Al ami MINUTES OF THE —� Edina Transportation Commission 0w e Thursday, August 19, 2010 �, 0 Edina City Hall 4801 West 501h Street lase 8a°8 Council Chambers ] MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean White, Geof Workinger, Nathan Franzen STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called order by chair Janovy. II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of July 15, 2010 and the Work Session Minutes of July 1, 2010 Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the minutes of July 15 with the following corrections or changes by Commissioner Sprague: Page 2: Sprague moved that they create uniformAy and comprehensive approach for local streets with a and therefore. enact a Comalete Streets policy. Motion seconded by Nelson. Page 3: Road Diet/Re- Striping Policy "Sprague said Bloomington has..." Road Reconstruction The motion was modified that the ETC receives annual updates of road reconstruction and the CIP, with a focus on the 2 -year plan but information on all projects in the 5 -year plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sprague. All voted aye. III. New Business a. 7355 York Avenue (Southdale YMCA Expansion) Chuck Rickart of WSB & Associates, the City's consulting traffic engineer, explained the Southdale YMCA expansion project. Mr. Rickart said the project was originally submitted in September 2008 as replacement of the YMCA with similar square footage and a 130 -unit multi - family housing complex and approval was granted by the ETC with minor median reconstruction at York Avenue and the north parking lot entrance; however, the project was never constructed. The current proposal is to expand the existing facility approximately 21,900 sq.ft. with minimal parking lot and other site alterations. The expansion would be used for fitness and aquatics purposes and it could increase membership by 15 %. The multi - family component is no longer included. Rickart said the development team was asked to look intersections previously looked at including Parklawn & York, the two accesses in and out of the site and the oval median north of the site. The traffic study analysis shows that the expansion will add 1,162 additional trips per day with all intersections operating at an acceptable level of service D, except for an E or F on some movements, most of which are onsite in the parking lot. As part of the travel demand management, pedestrian travel will be improved with maintenance of the sidewalk along York A33 Avenue, and creation of a new pedestrian walk from York Avenue to the front door. Additionally, approximately 15 -20 bicycle racks will be added. Based on the study analysis, Rickart said improvements are not recommended for the local street network. Staff's recommendation is "If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Commissioners' discussion included the following, followed by consultant's and staff's response: • Reason for stopping the study at year 2012 instead of 2020 — Rickart said it is best to look at the impact year (2012), instead of background traffic. • Report does not say if parking meets code — City engineer Houle said the Planning Commission (PC) reviews parking ratio. • South entrance is under - utilized, could almost be eliminated, explore options to increase usage — Houle said this entrance is only right -in /right -out while the other is both left and right. He said changes on York to accommodate changes to the access would require the County's approval and they tend to lean towards eliminating accesses. • Commissioner Bonneville said he likes the project but finds it difficult to approve a level of service E /F. Rickart said this is the current level without any crashes to date. Mr. Mike Spack, Spack Consulting, said they are defining average delay per car and if one car is coming out and has to wait one minute, this level of service is defined as F. • The island at the south entrance (on site) seems close for traffic coming into the park lot. Rickart said most parking lots are designed for drivers to go left or right upon entry, not straight ahead. • Can the travel demand management plan be improved on the site? Commissioner Schroeder said the PC can take a closer look at this. Spack said office buildings tend to have more control over employees; with the YMCA the controls will be more difficult. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the YMCA offer incentives that would spread usage throughout the day. • What would trigger a future traffic signal at Parklawn? Rickart said about 10 -20% increase in traffic which could be 5 -10 years out. After discussion the overall concerns were summarized as: • Improving the travel management demand plan (since the YMCA is heavily used by children and seniors); • Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; • Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and • Fire truck and ambulance access; Commissioner Bonneville asked if emergency vehicles will be able to move around the building. Houle said site circulation is the PC's purview and they receive comments from the Fire Marshall and the Building Department official. He reminded the ETC that their purview is the roadway and local transportation while site circulation, access, and safety are handled by the PC. Chair Janovy said they are finding it difficult to separate what is happening on site with the roadway because they work together. Commissioner Bonneville said there are some things that happen at entrances that affect the roadway severely so they should have the right to review those things because of the site itself and the function of the site. Houle said the Traffic 2 A'-ZLf Impact Analysis would need to be changed and the ETC would be more meshed with the PC to prevent duplication. Chair Janovy said in their last work session they made a motion to refer the TIA policy for update to staff and to have Assistant City Engineer Sullivan work with staff in the Planning Department, a couple ETC and PC commissioners to try and integrate the Transportation and Planning process better. Commissioner Bonneville motioned that the minutes shall act as the ETC's opinion as to the project's future and that the YMCA and Spack Consulting look into their concerns as stated in the minutes. Motion failed for lack of second. Commissioner Sprague motioned to accept the Traffic Impact Analysis that was presented and to include their three concerns that were raised as follows: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; and 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane. Commissioner Schroeder asked to amend the motion to read that it is their opinion that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems and request that their three concerns listed above be addressed. Commissioner Sprague accepted the amendment. After further discussion, the motion was restated by Commissioner Sprague that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems; however, the following recommendations are made: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Improve pedestrian safety in the parking lot; 3) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and 4) Improving the level of service at the northbound exit. Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. All voted aye. Motion carried. b. Edina Police Presentation Sergeant Tom Draper, a night supervisor with the Edina Police Department, explained the operations of the Traffic Unit. He said the unit with three officers, covers traffic enforcement from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He said staffing is comparable to other cities of similar size. Sgt. Draper said they are required to spend a certain amount of time at locations that are called in by residents. There is a speed trailer that is moved around to different locations. He said residents begin calling around March /April to get on the list. Regarding stop signs, he said the requests are referred to the Engineering Department. He said enforcement is increased in problem areas for stop sign violations, as well as no turn on red. Regarding bicycles, he said is not aware that citations have been issued instead they are warning riders that they are required to follow the same laws as motor vehicles. He was asked about joggers in the road when there is a sidewalk — he said he is not aware of citations being issued. He said they do target speeders in neighborhoods and have found that most violators do live in the neighborhood, on 70th Street, for example, most of the violators are residents. He said officers do have discretion when to write a citation; however, most drivers have come to expect a 5 mph leeway. A moving violation citation is $150 and this is set by Hennepin County. He said public education would be helpful since most of the violators are in the neighborhoods. Commissioner Janovy said the primary focus has been engineering solutions to traffic issues. She said other communities are using different approaches such as training residents to use 3 radar gun and writing down license plate number and sending a polite letter from the police department. Sgt. Draper said this has been discussed which is why the radar is out there. Houle talked a project called Project Lead Foot which he said is very much like the City's program but just not captured in the same way. He said traffic safety coordinator, Boyd, does go out and use a radar gun with residents and they are usually surprised to discover that the speed is not as fast as they thought it was. Commissioner Sprague said Chanhassen has found that raising awareness is the most useful through a traffic worksheet that they distribute to residents. Houle said many neighborhoods have their own listserve and this would be an inexpensive way to communicate. Traffic Safety Reports of June 2 and July 7 Chair Janovy said they agreed that the Traffic Safety Report would be put on their consent agenda. July 7 report — Section D — regarding the calls received from residents regarding France Avenue Restriping. Houle said most calls are due to the restriping which causes drivers to slow down. Houle explained that Section D of the report is new and is to show the types of calls that are received and that the issues are generally resolved without having to go to the Traffic Safety Committee. IV. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) No update. V. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) No update. VI. Staff Liaison Comments a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update Houle approvals were received from Mn /DOT, bids are set to be opened on September 9 and construction spring 2011. Regarding landscaping in the boulevard, Houle said they will coordinate with residents to move and transplant plantings within a specific timeframe at the residents' expense. He said irrigation /dog fence is included in the construction costs. Houle shared materials from a personal rapid transit workshop that he attended. He said the presenter is willing to attend a meeting to explain how it works. VII. Commission Comments No comments. VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. !n Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission o e Cn • `N�RPOP �� Item 11I. B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: August 19, 2010 Subject: Transportation Impact Analysis — 7355 York Avenue: Southdale YMCA Expansion Recommendation: Agenda Item No.: III. B. ACTION: ® Recommendation /Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting on August 9, 2010, review memo dated August 2, 2010 from WSB and Associates and the following staff report. Staff and WSB have reviewed the Transportation Impact Analysis from Spack Consulting for the Southdale YMCA Expansion dated August 9, 2010 and believe the development team has met our requirements. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect to the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: The Southdale YMCA submitted a proposal in September 2008 to demolish the 70,000 sq. ft. YMCA building and rebuild a 72,000 sq. ft. YMCA along with 130 unit of Multi- family housing. The transportation analysis was approved by the ETC with the condition that the median nose on York Avenue, at the north entrance, be modified to match the proposed reconfiguration of the parking lot. The parking lot had a 150 foot exclusive right turn lane and a shared left/thru to accommodate the on -site delays. However, the proposed redevelopment as outlined in September 2008 was never constructed. The current application is to expand the existing YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 sq. ft. without the addition of a housing component. 9. G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Comm ission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819_7355_York_YMCA.docx Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item 111. B. With the revised site redevelopment the City required the development team to update the 2008 transportation impact analysis (TIA) with the most current existing traffic and projected traffic impacts. The TIA's objectives were to: 1. analyze the existing and proposed traffic operations of the following intersections: York Avenue at Parklawn York Avenue and the north and south YMCA entrances York Avenue at the "oval about" north of the YMCA facility 2. Recommend improvement to the local street network, if needed. An initial TIA was submitted to the City and WSB for review in Mid -July. From that report a memo with 12 outstanding issues was created (dated August 2, 2010, not included in your packet ) and sent back to Spack Consulting. The follow up TIA dated August 9, 2010 from Spack Consulting addresses all the questions and comments as outlined in the WSB memo. The Southdale YMCA's Transportation Impact Analysis shows that all study intersections will continue to operate at LOS D or better during all study periods once the facility is fully operational (2012). They have addressed travel demand management and pedestrian concerns to our satisfaction. In addition, no improvements are required of the local street network. The median nose at York Avenue and the north YMCA entrance can remain as is. kA G:\Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819 7355 York YMCA.docx WSB & Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: August 2, 2010 Re: Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study dated July 12'h, 2010 prepared by Spack Consulting for the proposed Southdale YMCA Expansion located on the east side of York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue A previous redevelopment project was proposed for the YMCA site in 2008. The original project included a new YMCA building with Multi- Family on the site. The previous plan, although was approved, is now proposed to be modified. The current proposed project involves the expansion of the existing 67,700 SF YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 SF. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared and reviewed as part of the proposed project in 2008. That study has been updated with the new development proposal. Based on our review of the updated Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study, the following questions and comments are made. The original Traffic Impact Study indicated that the existing YMCA was 70,000 SF. The new Traffic Impact Study indicates the existing YMCA is 67,700 SF. This needs to be clarified. 2. The Land Use discussion on page 3 indicates that the total square footage with the expansion will be 91,900. Table 2.1 indicates that the total square footage will be 89.620. This needs to be clarified. 3. On page 4 the development phasing and timing indicates that the project will be fully operational by the "END" of 2012. The analysis looked at 2012 as the full build out of the site with background traffic. What would be the impact of another year of background traffic on the study intersections? This would provide a more realistic indication of full build out impacts. `�� c %wse\Ed =%ffl.4awhaLdc -080210 YMCA.doc Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 2 of 3 4. Figure 2.2 shows the proposed concept plan. A more detailed figure should be provided showing the existing medians on York Avenue in association with the site driveways. 5. The existing analysis indicates that the north YMCA access experiences longer delays during the PM peak hour. How does this impact the existing site circulation? 6. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event. How does the parking compare with what is required by Zoning? 7. Figure 3.4 does not show existing "Stop Signs" for the YMCA access driveways. It is implied in the text that they are there. If not they should be added with this project. 8. Figure 3.8 shows existing Average Daily Traffic volumes from 2005.2009 volumes are now available. This figure should be updated. The other figures (4.13) and analysis associated with the ADT volumes should also be updated. 9. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the North Site entrance will have some movements at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. • The overall Level of Service at the North Site entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement at LOS F. If another year of background traffic were to be assumed how, would the North Site entrance intersection be impacted? • The queuing analysis indicates that there may be "significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the AM and PM peak hours ". How does this significant queue get handled on the site? • The queuing analysis in the previous study and for the AM condition shows 150 foot storage for the westbound through, left and right at the North Site access intersection. The PM peak shows a 600 foot available storage. This appears to be a typo. If that is the case the PM peak queue will be in excess of the available storage. This should be mitigated. 10. No mitigation is recommended with the proposed expansion. The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis from the previous study recommended adding a right turn lane on York Avenue and a westbound right turn lane at the North Site entrance. The queue analysis does not show a significant improvement from the original study to the current study. Why are these improvements not being recommended now? hp c:\wSB \Edi .w1EM01w hou1co902i0 YMCA da Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 3 of 3 11. The study discusses the use and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It should be expanded to include, how people at the YMCA can get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided / available? 12. A general discussion on pedestrian / bike accommodations should be provided. A figure similar to that provided with the previous study should be included showing existing and planned sidewalk and bike facilities. Will YMCA have bike racks or other amenities for pedestrians? If so, where are they in relationship to the sidewalk and trail facilities? Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the traffic impact study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. h31 C.kWSBWAi- u 40- .tM"8021oYMCA.a- a c THE TRAffIC STUDY COMPANY ♦ n�.r t � a �1 z' y } a i � ♦t� r r r V Parklam Avg_ �L�� Traffic Impact Stud Southdale YMCA Expansion Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.. By -�G�f Micha/1 P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: August 9, 2010 Ap TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary .......................... ..............................1 2. Proposed Development and Study Area ... ............................... 3 3. Existing Traffic Conditions ......................... ............................... 7 4. Projected Traffic .......................................... .............................16 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis ........... ............................... 32 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ...... ............................... 36 7. Appendix ...................................................... .............................37 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 - Location Map .................................................... ..............................5 Figure 2.2 - Concept Plan .................................................... ..............................6 Figure 3.1 - Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking .. ..............................9 Figure 3.2 - Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking ... ..............................9 Figure 3.3 - Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking ........ .............................10 Figure 3.4 - Existing Conditions ........................................ .............................11 Figure 3.5 - Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................12 Figure 3.6 - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................13 Figure 3.7 - Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic ............. .............................14 Figure 3.8 - Existing Daily Traffic ....................................... .............................15 Figure 4.1 - Trip Distribution .............................................. .............................19 Figure 4.2 - A.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development .........................20 Figure 4.3 - P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..........................21 Figure 4.4 - Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..................22 Figure 4.5 - Daily Volumes Due to Development .............. .............................23 Figure 4.6 - 2012 No -Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................24 Figure 4.7 - 2012 No -Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................25 Figure 4.8 - 2012 No -Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ............................26 Figure 4.9 - 2012 No -Build Daily Volumes ......................... .............................27 Figure 4.10 - 2012 Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................28 Figure 4.11 - 2012 Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................29 Figure 4.12 - 2012 Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ... .............................30 Figure 4.13 - 2012 Build Daily Volumes ............................. .............................31 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 - Before /After Square Footage of Uses .............. ..............................4 Table 3.1 - Existing Level of Service ( LOS) ........................ ..............................8 Table 4.1 -Trip Generation .................................................. .............................18 Table 5.1 - 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .......................32 Table 5.2 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .............................32 Table 5.3 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results ......... .............................34 Southdale YMCA Expansion i Traffic Impact Study 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. They are proposing to build an approximately 21,900 addition onto the approximately 67,700 square foot YMCA. The purpose of this report is to determine if completion of this addition will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system. The study objectives are: i. Determine how the existing York Avenue South intersections at Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road currently operate. ii. Determine if the existing Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road will operate with acceptable vehicle delays and stacking after the addition is fully occupied in 2012. iii. Recommend improvements if needed. A traffic study was prepared in 2008 for a proposed redevelopment, which included housing. The current proposal eliminates housing and is limited to expanding the existing YMCA. Based on discussions with City of Edina staff, this traffic study updates the report from 2008 to account for the proposed expansion project. b. Executive Summary The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. The facility currently has approximately 67,700 square feet and the addition is proposed to add approximately 21,900 square feet. The site is located in Edina, MN on York Avenue South between Parklawn Avenue and the traffic circle south of Hazelton Road. Access to the site will be from two existing intersections on York Avenue South. The north intersection is a full intersection and the south intersection is a right in /right out intersection. City staff has requested a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic impacts of the redevelopment on the adjacent roadways for 2012 (when it is assumed full occupancy will occur). The intersections studied are: Southdale YMCA Expansion 1 Traffic Impact Study • York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue • York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road The principal findings of this study are: i. The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. ii. The maximum queues at the study intersections are anticipated to be contained within the existing lanes through the 2012 Build scenario. iii. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. iv. Based on the parking analysis completed for the redevelopment, it is anticipated that providing 297 total parking spaces for the site will be adequate. To adequately mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development, the following improvement plan is recommended: i. Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. ii. Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: • The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. Southdale YMCA Expansion 2 Traffic Impact Study • The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. • The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 2. Proposed Development and Study Area a. Site Location The proposed development site is located on York Avenue South north of Parklawn Avenue and south of the traffic circle located south of Hazelton Road in Edina, MN. The existing site driveways are planned to remain unaltered with the expansion project. See Figure 2.1 for a location map. It shows the location of the study intersections, which are: • York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue • York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road b. Land Use and Intensity The existing YMCA is approximately 67,700 square feet. Note the 2008 Traffic Study listed the existing YMCA as 70,000 square feet, but that figure did not account for stairwells, mechanical rooms, etc. per Edina City Code. The proposed addition will add approximately 21,900 square feet, bringing the total square footage to approximately 89,620 square feet. The site will provide 297 parking stalls after the expansion project is complete (a reduction of 40 stalls from the existing 337). Table 2.1 shows the uses in the existing facility as well as the uses planned to be in the facility after the remodeling /addition project are complete (along with their associated square footages). Southdale YMCA Expansion 3 Traffic Impact Study Table 2.1 — Before /After Square Footage of Uses YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Development Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. A37 Southdale YMCA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study Square Footage Square Footage Use Before Expansion After Expansion Fitness Spaces (cardio, weights, studios, racquetball 20,570 33,450 together, walking track Locker Rooms 11,140 10,560 Aquatics (pools and Jacuzzi) 6,800 10,500 Drop -in Childcare 5,255 5,510 Staff (offices, conference) 2,010 2,360 Total Area (including hallways, mechanical 67,720 89,620 s aces, etc. YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Development Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. A37 Southdale YMCA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study p.a c _ TRAf fIG STVDr COMPANY F11JUI V 2.1 Location Maps �os, YMCA Redevelopment a North Edina, MN', '� a'Y;;;4..�.e �•.k. r;., ..,.,...: No Scale i0- ■w.. a ....... ..e LLOJ C� " �11 e.,erin wrt „�n SD M.pM We.. '••' � cNtlNS�� Slq.wi.W SVM.. ■.« leY. �!yJ MM1.mN1 3se■o �� 'E6 ■reeil�■fn{S. s�U—0..y w „ p •� ��artti ,Di ■.w.w v.nq Mnne.eop. w�•e�me e. ^ ^e w•,,.y • oadw M •d /'./ Y♦ A a•� ..._ aw .!+ s� - .n. W Y.1 Weodln. ry �. r'!{. i 1,. •. •I { �..a 1. t p, V .: .o,tq, r, ve i �• `Y.'"i / ,rr-- -.. aa� RhIrly Arne = Study Intersections �i Proposed Site Southdale YMCA Expansion 5 Traffic Impact Study Sack p •RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 2.2 Concept Plan YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Driveway Remains Unaltered New Sidewalk Planned from York Avenue to Front Door Driveway Remains Unaltered 15 to20 Bike Racks Planned Near Front Door w rt�rllr� "' M Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects. Southdale YMCA Expansion 6 Traffic Impact Study 3. Existing Traffic Conditions a. Physical Characteristics Access to the site will be provided by two existing intersections on York Avenue South. York Avenue South is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31 and is designated as a Major Collector by Hennepin County. Parklawn Avenue is a City street and is designated as a collector by the City of Edina. Existing traffic control, speed limits, and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.4 for each study intersection. Figure 3.4 shows the stop signs that physically exist, although all driveways are legally stop condition. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of York Avenue near the site. No roadway improvements are scheduled near the site. b. Traffic Volumes The weekday a.m., weekday p.m. and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted in 2008 at the study intersections (see Figures 3.5, 3.6 & 3.7). The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods align with typical rush hours. The YMCA classes have the heaviest attendance during the morning on Saturdays. Since the traffic patterns in the area are most impacted by the shopping district, it is believed the late a.m. period on Saturday has the heaviest combination of site traffic and background traffic. The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The daily traffic volumes for the area roadways are shown on Figure 3.8. c. Level of Service LOS A LOS D = Acceptable LOS F = Unacceptable Source: City of San Jose, CA Southdale YMCA Expansion An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is considered acceptable in urban conditions. Individual movements are also assigned LOS grades. One or more individual movements typically operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled 7 Traffic Impact Study intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual movements. The LOS results for the 2008 study hours are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4 (all driveway exits are treated as having stop control, which they are legally, even if a stop sign isn't present). The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.5 through 3.7 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The SYNCHROTM model was created for this project since the study intersections are not part of the city's existing model. The intersections will be added to the city's model if the project is approved and constructed. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 3.1 — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/C B/F A/ D York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / B A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A/C A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A / B A/C A / C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections operate acceptably at LOS B or better in the existing a.m. weekday, p.m. weekday and Saturday midday peak hours. As often happens along busy corridors such as York Avenue, some individual side street movements experience longer delays while the overall intersection operates acceptably with little overall delay. The eastbound and westbound approaches at the York Ave /North YMCA Entrance currently experience LOS F in the weekday p.m. peak hour. The eastbound approach currently experiences LOS F at the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue intersection in the weekday p.m. peak hour while the westbound approach experiences LOS E. d. Parking Volumes Parking capacity was determined to be 337 stalls combining spaces on both the west and east sides of the existing facility. Data on the actual number of cars parked was collected immediately prior to all three data collection timeframes. This beginning number was then adjusted based on the turning movement counts completed at the Southdale YMCA Expansion 8 W Traffic Impact Study site's driveways to provide a total number of cars in the lots in fifteen minute increments. Following in Figures 3.1 through 3.3 are the results of this data collection. Additional details are contained in the appendix. Figure 3.1 — Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking 400 350 350 300 300 250 49 250 Occupied 200 — Occupied o� 200 C Capacity 150 Capacity 150 a IL 50 100 0 50 a a 0 a a a a a n. a a a a a M O 7 M it O 7 M d a a a a LO W O LO O LO O W O to o h I­ co O CO O O W O Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 250 Occupied 200 C Capacity 150 a 100 50 0 a a a a a a a a n. M O 7 M it O 7 M d ui iA in LO W (O O Southdale YMCA Expansion 9 Traffic Impact Study Figure 3.3 — Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking 400 350 rn 300 19 250 U) - Occupied c 200 150 Capacity a 100 50 0 2 2 2 2 Q Q ¢ Q ¢ a a a M it O � M � O r M O O .= (V N N The maximum number of occupied spaces during the study periods was 177 spaces. Average occupancy, based on the available 337 parking spaces, was 40% of capacity. Following are the high and low occupancy rates for each time period: • Thursday a.m. -high 53% and low 31% • Thursday p.m. — high 42% and low 29% • Saturday — high 47% and low 27% e. Data Sources The sources for the data sited above are: • Turning movement counts — Traffic Data Inc. • Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting • Concept plan — BWBR Architects • Daily traffic volumes — Mn /DOT traffic flow maps Ala Southdale YMCA Expansion 10 Traffic Impact Study ack S s PTHE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Existing U nes & 1-ra YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN 0 Traffic Circle NW Z Traffic Circle SW ii Apartment North Driveway E Bus Stop (Routes 538, 539, 578) Apartment South Driveway ■ 30 mph O U) m C a Y O Southdale YMCA Expansion r CL E W 9q Circle NE Traffic Circle SE T* (enter only) Pedestrian Underpass YMCA North Driveway Olff QBus Stop (Routes 538, 539, 578) L *YMCA South Driveway 1� 11 Fi Traffic Impact Study 3.4 North No Scale SQack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 3.5 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale A s Southdale YMCA Expansion 12 Traffic Impact Study Pack MUwFIC STUDY COMPANY Existing PM. Peak Hour YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN i 24 19 +==10- Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW o, L 73 0'0 ado «Jlb �43 4r 6 7./ 0 4 + N N co i Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Southdale YMCA Expansion c Volumes r 2 O rn 41 C d Q Y O } 13 Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Figure 3.6 It North No Scale L 14 \ ♦�8 411 to 0 co f0 co O , C, 61rT t� 26 I �� / o m L 22 \ co n m 4�0 tr 4r 6 South Driveway A +� Traffic Impact Study L6 co n m 4�0 4r 6 South Driveway 93r 0 MMI0. cO/ 84m% A +� Traffic Impact Study SP-ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 3. Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale h10 Southdale YMCA Expansion 14 Traffic Impact Study Sp-ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 3.8 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Rc Circle NE Mc Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway LEGEND 2009 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes source: WDOT Traffic Flow Maps Southdale YMCA Expansion 15 1 k4 Traffic Impact Study 4. Projected Traffic The assumptions described in this section were reviewed by City of Edina engineering staff before the forecasts in this section were developed. a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed YMCA expansion based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Stn Edition. The Weekday a.m. peak hour trip generation is for the `one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 7 -9 a.m. The Weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation is for the `one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 4 -6 p.m. The Saturday peak hour trip generation is for the "peak hour of generators. In addition a 15% growth factor was applied to the existing entering and exiting peak hour volumes. This represents the possible maximum growth in membership. The resultant trip generations are shown in Table 4.1. No trip reductions for pass -by or diverted trips were made. It is assumed all of the trips for the site will be newly generated. Also, there is bus service available near the site on York Avenue but no trip reductions were taken for transit use. These assumptions result in a more conservative analysis. The directional orientation of the generated traffic is shown in Figure 4.1. This orientation is based on a weighted distribution of the traffic volumes currently using York Avenue South. The daily traffic volume on each road segment was divided by the sum of the daily traffic volumes on the road segments to develop the directional orientation. The a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, Saturday peak hour and daily trips generated by the site were assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5. These traffic volumes will be added to the existing traffic volumes to develop the build -out conditions. b. Non -site Traffic Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 scenario by applying a 0.92% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 year growth factor of 1.2 the Mn /DOT State Aid office assigned to Hennepin County in 2008. The 2012 No -Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. Southdale YMCA Expansion 16 AV\ Traffic Impact Study c. Total Traffic for 2012 Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development, as shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5, to the No -Build volumes shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. The resultant 2012 Build traffic forecasts are shown in Figures 4.10 through 4.13. Southdale YMCA Expansion • 17 �SO Traffic Impact Study Snack RAF->�■r� COrrNl THE E TRAPi1C STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.1 Trip Distribution t YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale E eke .,o ++ Za►.aL+• -'! .. r. I i' 1 r Southdale YMCA Expansion 19J Traffic Impact Study S p,�a ck ,iuDY IPA Table 4.1 Forecast Trip Generation YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Daily Volumes LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS (GFA) QUANTITY DAILY RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 330 330 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 22.88 50% 50% 0% 0 0% 0 251 251 TOTALS 0 0 581 581 AM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY AM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER I EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 29 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.62 61% 39% 0% 0 0% 0 22 14 TOTALS 0 0 51 35 PM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY PM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 26 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.45 37% 63% 0% 0 0% 0 12 20 TOTALS 0 0 38 41 Saturday Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY SAT RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER I EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 14 22 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.07 54% 46% 0% 0 0% 0 13 11 TOTALS 0 0 27 33 NOTES: 1. GFA = Gross Floor Area 2. YMCA Expansion Daily = 2.75 x normal ITE rate for existing 67.7 KSF x 15% growth 3. YMCA Expansion Peak Hours = 15% growth x existing entering and exiting volumes 4. All other trip generation rates based on 'Trip Generation ", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition unless otherwise noted. 5. All other A.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7:00 & 9:00 a.m.). 6. All other P.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4:00 & 6:00 p.m.). 7. All other Saturday Midday Trip Generation is for the peak hour of generator B. No Saturday peak hour trip generation is available for ITE Code 253 - assume Saturday is the same as pm peak hour. Southdale YMCA Expansion 18 Traffic Impact Study Suack THE`RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY ■ figure 4.2 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development + YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale L0 ° ° �o �0 j.. 0 0 0 O M O 0� / L 20-"�\ 4o 1 4 r 20 fiat t r 0: Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW North Driveway Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North '1 t go O N O 01 IN* 0 N O q�4-1 L0� ° N ° �••� o Apartment South Driveway j 4 1. 0 MCA South Driveway 0 '1 too oz ° t O U) m m a Y O } 63 Southdale YMCA Expansion 20 Traffic Impact Study SQack THE•RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY _Figure 4.3 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development Ir YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale r 0 m C m a Y O Southdale YMCA Expansion 21 Traffic Impact Study Pac THE`RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.4 Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development + YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale o i r4r 0,� 0 0 M 0 O N O +j l'-� o� \0 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW / L 20 O O N «fib «� O r10 os titr► O 4l 0 �, 0 i 000 Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn 0 m c m Q Y O } Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Lo 4�0 �t� 000 N / 01 T r► 0 My N o r Lo O 4l tit 0 0 ass 22 Traffic Impact Study Driveway %Ml"/South ass 22 Traffic Impact Study a. c'k THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.5 Daily Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue 00 s Y O d c d Q �C O } Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Driveway South Driveway 6( Southdale YMCA Expansion 23 Traffic Impact Study ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.6 2012 AM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes T YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale 0 L 40 o 4WEE 10 Imom 30 j to 30 0 0 0 rn 20 + * a Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE 0 00 0 N 0 V 60J t f♦ 40 ==10, 20 =-► O o 20 ml Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE /o o L70 L20\ o «— 0 4j 4117 60 f. *1tf 4J i 1oJ tr► 0y 200-% N n 0 e' 0 + i O O co M ao i Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway %;/ M NN Apartment South Driveway YMCA South Driveway / Parklawn t 7 O N GI 7 C d a Y O k5l Southdale YMCA Expansion 24 Traffic Impact Study SP-ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4■ ■ 2012 PM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes /r YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale L,0 0) 4-20 X10 4j 30 I I rl qtr► C C O 20__V CR Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE v ao n C+=11 30 y Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE 0 L 80 o L 20 0 o ao m ♦.0 o m JF �40 �l ,pJ *11 f* tr' 0mor o o 0 �m 0 0 0� °m Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway o L ,0 Apartment South Driveway YMCA South Driveway � ^ � 4J � L► ~ � 0 r '1 t to ,o� °a °D 100.t 0 90 Parklawn Avenue r 0 xn xu c xu Q Y O NA Southdale YMCA Expansion 25 Traffic Impact Study S ac 121r_� PTHE•RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.8 2012 Saturday Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes f YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale L 20 N m ♦� 10 ♦� 20 «j 40 30 Traffic Circle NW / o N t�0 r 20 =a* \o `i Traffic Circle SW /O Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue r c� 7 O U7 m 3 C m Q Y O } �tlr O o 0 Traffic Circle NE so J 10= 0 f♦ \♦ No Traffic Circle SE I `O 1 L0 \ o� t Ir YMCA North Driveway 10 -1 co L10 °n I ° 4�0 41 IYMCA South Driveway 1L ,o r 7o J ♦1 T �+ 20 � 0 % a Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Traffic Impact Study IL 100 ° � 0 �0 1L, rso ♦1 1 i1'' O O 10 J 0 � 10 10 � N Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue r c� 7 O U7 m 3 C m Q Y O } �tlr O o 0 Traffic Circle NE so J 10= 0 f♦ \♦ No Traffic Circle SE I `O 1 L0 \ o� t Ir YMCA North Driveway 10 -1 co L10 °n I ° 4�0 41 IYMCA South Driveway 1L ,o r 7o J ♦1 T �+ 20 � 0 % a Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Traffic Impact Study S Q. a c k THE •RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.9 2012 Daily No -Build Traffic Volumes T YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN . No Scale `ic Circle NE Mc Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway A60 Southdale YMCA Expansion 27 Traffic Impact Study ac s THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 AM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN r c 7 O N d 7 C d i Q Y O } 441 Figure 4.1 Southdale YMCA Expansion 28 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale S ac PTF1E TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.11 2012 PM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale o L 10 r0i w X20 r. 30 4-10 ti 1 r► 2U+ i O O 0 v0- Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE 0 m n0 70 1 11� 30 20m% Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE 30 e, La °f 0' L100 L20 0 .- 4. 0 0 60 cc 41 10.1 *11 i1♦ t 11♦ o--P� hto 00 00 m 10 .+ i r- 0 Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway o L10 Apartment South Driveway In�9 411 q* 4-.0 r 10 MCA South Driveway 100.: *11 r a 90+ W/ r_ e� 7 O N m 7 C N Q Aa Southdale YMCA Expansion 29 Traffic Impact Study Sp-ack THE•RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.12 2012 Saturday Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale 0 30 o o N W o 10 F. *j lt� 20 E=0 \0 El Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW Apartment South Driveway O U) d a Y O } Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North L20\ ♦� 20 '1 1 it O C O M to eo 1 L 1 2 0 9 40.0 J�%#04gm i f o 0 memo. ° r 42 a Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway O U) d a Y O } Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North L20\ ♦� 20 '1 1 it O C O M to eo 1 1 It's 10 �► 4..� o CD La L0 o South Driveway 42 a ' C' ° o L 10\ P N r 4..� o 1 L + r 10 South Driveway 70 + t r + too 200 a to A43 30 Traffic Impact Study ac fwgnzoll� THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 Daily Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN fic Circle NE Ific Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway 4Gk Figure 4.13 Southdale YMCA Expansion 31 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2012 Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2012 study hours are shown in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4. It is assumed all of the lane configurations and traffic control are the same between the No -Build and Build scenarios. Table 5.1 No Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.6, 4.7 & 4.8. Table 5.2 Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D B/F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / A A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / D A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. Table 5.2 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D C/ F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A/13 A / B A/13 York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / E D / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections will operate acceptably at LOS D or better in all of the study scenarios. Based on level of service analyses, there may be vehicle stacking issues at the North YMCA entrance and on Parklawn Avenue. Vehicle stacking at these two intersections is addressed in the next section. fS Southdale YMCA Expansion 32 Traffic Impact Study Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2012 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in the No -Build and Build scenarios. Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, a four lane divided roadway such as York Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28,000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. A four lane undivided roadway such as Parklawn Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 15,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for LOS D on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in both the 2012 No- Build and Build scenarios. b. Queuing Analysis Based on the Level of Service analyses above, the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections may have significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. To determine the length of the queues in the 2012 Build scenario, a more detailed traffic analysis was per-formed with a SimTrafficTM micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.4 were used with the p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10 and 4.11. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were transferred from SYNCHROT to SimTrafficTM The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 3 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 3 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. Table 5.3 shows a summary of the stacking results for the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections in the 2012 Build a.m. and p.m. peak hours. A45 Southdale YMCA Expansion 33 Traffic Impact Study Table 5.3 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results motes: Approximate queue iengtns are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffiJm for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 ' J41 Traffic Impact Study York Ave /Parklawn Ave York Ave /North YMCA A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Left 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Thru 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) W Right 30 ft 170 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Left 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Thru 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Right 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Left 50 ft 50 ft 40 ft 40 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Thru Oft Oft Oft Oft o (900 ft) (900 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) Z Right Oft Oft Oft Oft (250 ft) (250 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) Left O ft 30 ft 60 ft 60 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) M Thru Oft Oft Oft Oft (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) 0 Right 20 ft 20 ft O ft O ft (225 ft) (225 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) motes: Approximate queue iengtns are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffiJm for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 ' J41 Traffic Impact Study The Mn /DOT crash database was reviewed (with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool). From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008 there was one crash at the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection. It occurred on June 13, 2007 and was a rear end crash between two northbound vehicles. There is not a significant crash problem at the intersection that will be exacerbated by the expansion project. c. Traffic Control Needs Traffic signals or roundabouts should be installed at intersections when justified per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. None of the traffic volume warrants in the Manual will be met in the 2012 Build condition. In order to meet the Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3), the minor street would need to have 150 left turn volumes on one approach. None of the study intersections will meet this threshold. The westbound approach at the northern YMCA access will have 80 vehicles in the a.m. peak hour with little traffic growth after the redevelopment happens. The eastbound Parklawn Avenue approach to York Avenue will have 100 vehicles in the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour. If traffic grows in the study area, the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue may be a long term candidate to be controlled by a traffic.signal or a roundabout. No new traffic control devices are required for the YMCA site redevelopment. The existing stop sign control for traffic leaving the site should be maintained with the redevelopment. d. Parking Analysis The maximum number of occupied parking spaces was 177 during the study period. The facility will be expanded by approximately 32% with the proposed addition. Increasing the peak parking demand by 32 %, results in the need for 234 parking stalls. Increasing the 234 stalls by 15% to account for additional membership growth, results in a maximum expected parking need of 269 stalls. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the peak parking demand. e. Transit Facilities There is a bus stop on York Avenue directly in front of the YMCA. Metro Transit routes 538, 539, and 578 serve the bus stop during the morning and evening rush hours. Downtown Minneapolis and the Mall of America are directly accessible via these routes. In addition, these routes stop at the Southdale Transit Center where transfers Southdale YMCA Expansion 35 Traffic Impact Study can be made to Metro Transit route 6, 114, 152, 515, 631, and 6.93. The YMCA site is well served by Metro Transit bus service. f. Travel Demand Management Plan Travel demand management plans work well in reducing trips back and forth between work and home via single occupant vehicles in the rush hours. The YMCA will make reasonable efforts to reduce these types of trips. The YMCA is directly served by Metro Transit via the bus stop adjacent to the site. The YMCA implements flexible work hours with the majority of its staff and volunteers working outside of the normal 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. work schedule. The YMCA is not a large enough employer at this location to fully implement other strategies such as structured carpooling or telecommuting. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, weekday p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue intersections are anticipated to be contained within existing storage lanes through the 2012 Build scenarios. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the anticipated peak parking demand of 269 vehicles. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. Based on the traffic analysis contained in this report, the following improvements are recommended: • Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. • Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. Southdale YMCA Expansion 36 k &� Traffic Impact Study • The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. • The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 7. Appendix a. Site Plan b. Traffic counts c. Parking capacity analysis d. Capacity analysis backup e. Queuing analysis backup Note — To reduce the size of the printed document, it was determined Appendices B through E (approximately 100 pages of technical data) should not be printed. They are available electronically from Jack Sullivan at the City of Edina. Southdale YMCA Expansion 37 A 7 Q Traffic Impact Study b ' A e - Prelim' p Y �II� 11, ompa i ON!.. s r------------ - - - -,, .. o °In U55 W U I I V 2 I a$ I 09 d I IY I I 1 r e A I WO Hll a��N C IIIIIIIIIIIIII MEN HIM c of — o — _ ss DO c s Ce s • s • s e s ♦ n u C Southdale YMCA Expansion Al 4 ! ) Traffic Impact Study =' II II II 1I-- w J, I � / I � H TFU ll I t of — II I _ IlVlillilIIV1IIIII I W�� 1 Sheet Title Proposed Site Plan Project Southdale YMCA Renovation Edina, Minnesota i r I) I I 6 I 1 ! 0. \�l e III III � �II a WE I I I 1 / I i a Drawn Date Comm. No. Sheet No. MMS 10 Aug 2010 3.2010051.00 WW Lawson Commons 380 St Peter Stree; Suite 600 �BR Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 Voice: 651.222.3701 WW Fax: 651.222.8961 `� ARCHITECTS Copyright BWBR Architects o e �tA ,o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF �NroRM $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER JOBS To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. A. From: Name of Author: John Keprios Title: Director of Parks and Recreation Date: Date of Meeting: October 19, 2010 Subject: Truck Mounted Aerial Device — Edina Park Maintenance Department Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: October 12, 2010 December 6, 2010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Dueco, Inc. 1. $77,219.00 (plus sales tax & license) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Dueco, Inc. $77,219.00 (plus sales tax & license GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase and installation of a new aerial device for the recently purchased aerial truck for the Park Maintenance Department. This aerial device is a personnel carrier Terex - Utilities Hi- Ranger XT60 model that has a height reach of 65 feet. This is an important piece of equipment for the Park Maintenance Department as it is used all year round primarily for a variety of forestry tasks. This aerial device (bucket) is also used for special events such as, Homecoming, High School Graduation, Fourth of July, occasional use by the Electrical Department and Police Department, flag replacement and flag pole repair and a variety of tasks at our recreation enterprise facilities. The bid opening took place on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. at City Hall and only one bid was received which is from Dueco, Incorporated. Our research gave us an expected expense of approximately $80,000 for this purchase (not including trade -in). Our maintenance staff tested various models before specifying this type of aerial lift. Two other vendors we contacted who could meet specifications chose not to bid. We feel that $77,219.00 is a competitive price and this particular piece of equipment is not available on a State or County Bid Program., This bid requested a quote for a trade -in credit for our 1990 Ford Aerial Truck (20 year old truck with aerial device). Dueco provided a quote of $8,500.00 in a trade -in credit, which would have reduced the total cost to $68,719.00. It is staffs recommendation to not accept that offer because we have good reason to believe that we can get more for the 1990 Ford Aerial Truck at the public auction. As written into the bid document; "The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids or any portion thereof." The bid of $77,219.00 includes installation of this new aerial bucket device onto the new Freightliner Model M2 106 Truck that was purchased under the Minnesota State Contract #443442 and approved by City Council on September 7, 2010. This purchase is funded under the Equipment Replacement section now under the Capital Improvement Plan. Park and Recreation i nature Department The Recommended Bid is vv within udget not within budget John allin, Finance Director Ceil Smith, Interim City Manager '�kA, o e VA o REQUEST TO REJECT ALL BIDS ,eaa To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. B. From: Name of Author: John Keprios Title: Director of Parks and Recreation Date: Date of Meeting: October 19, 2010 Subject: Exterior Improvements — Braemar Arena Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: August 20, 2010 October 20, 2010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Prestige Builders of Minnesota, LLC 1. $152,000.00 2. Langer Construction 2. $155,000.00 3. Parkos Construction Co., Inc. 3. $161,800.00 4. Lund Martin Construction, Inc. 4. $170,000.00 5. LS Black Constructors 5. $170,500.00 6. McFarland Construction Company 6. $178,700.00 7. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. 7. $178,777.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Reject all bids. GENERAL INFORMATION: On Friday, August 20, 2010, sealed bids were opened for exterior improvements specified for Braemar Arena. Seven bids were received and opened and the low bid was Prestige Builders of Minnesota with a bid of $152,000.00. For budget purposes, the specifications requested an add - alternate bid for the purchase and installation of a screen wall for the Braemar West Arena exterior ammonia refrigeration room. Prestige Builders chose not to bid the add - alternate. The add - alternate results were: 1. Prestige Builders of Minnesota, LLC 1. No bid 2. Langer Construction 2. $24,000.00 3. Parkos Construction Co., Inc. 3. $21,800.00 4. Lund Martin Construction, Inc. 4. ,$29,800.00 5. LS Black Constructors .5. $28,000.00 6. McFarland Construction Company 6. $29,000.00 7. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. 7. $35,000.00 The base bid for exterior improvements included new stucco on all four sides of the West Arena; painting the barrel vault end of the north side of the West Arena; screen wall for the transformer; new curb & gutter and sidewalk; replacement and relocation of flag poles; and new exterior decorative lights. The engineer's estimates were $208,010.00 for those improvements. Unfortunately the renovation of the West Arena has,experienced some unforeseen change orders as shown on the attached Change Order Index from Stevens Engineering. We have over $107,000.00 in change orders to date (approximately 5% above of the base bid); however, the project is still not complete. Our consulting engineer's estimated remaining fund balance is approximately $129,193.88 to date with over three weeks remaining until substantial completion. That would leave us a minimum of 15% short of funds needed to award the exterior bid. It is therefore staffs recommendation to reject all bids for the exterior improvements. This will also give staff the opportunity to revisit the exterior improvement priorities. Our intent is to continue to pursue the highest priority exterior improvements after the interior West Arena renovations are complete and where possible utilize internal staff to make improvements with the remaining resources available to ensure that we stay within budget. i ature The Recommended Bid is within budget Park and Recreation Department X not within budget John W lin, Finance Director Ceil Smith, Interim City Manager Change Order Index Project: Braemar Arena - 2010 Improvements Location: Edina, MN Project No. 900-09-076 Contractor. Cool Air Mechanical Contact: Mark Worms Response by Ph: (651) 487 -8825 1 Fam. Date Created: Date last updated: Contract Amount Contract Amt W/ approved CO Percent of Contract Contract Amt W/ proposed CO Pprront of rnntrnrt 6.3.10 10.13.10 $2,180,540.00 $2,218,962.00 1.8% $2,287,749.00 a ao% O Steven s E N C I N E E R S 6 PLANNERS C.O. No. Created from Description To Contract From Contract To Owner From Owner Proposed Cost ($) Approv (YIN) Approved Cost ($) Response by Comments 1 PR 4 Replace 1 1/2" pipe w/ 21/2 521.10 6.11.10 5.24.10 5.28.10 $15,366.00 Y $15,366.00 NRA $2,516,249.12 2 PR 1 Eliminate back pressure regulator 5.24.10 6.11.10 5.24.10 5.28.10 -$1,728.00 Y -$1,728.00 SEI 3 PR 3 Use Boiler for ground thaw 5.27.10 6.11.10 6.14.10 6.9.10 $0.00 Y $0.00 SEI Credit service contract $9,424.00 4 PR 2 Construct underground pipe trench 7.1.10 7.2.10 7.2.10 7.13.10 $16,345.00 Y $16.345.00 SEI 5 PR 11 Replace concrete stoop pad 7.1.10 7.2.10 7.2.10 7.13.10 $8,439.00 Y $8,439.00 SEI 6 PR 7,8 dud wrap, gas line 8.20.10 8.26.10 8.26.10 $1,771.00 $0.00 NRA 7 NA North side exterior work changes 820.10 8.26.10 8.26.10 $2,082.00 $0.00 NRA 8 NA Changes to bleacher area 8.20.10 8.26.10 8.26.10 $6,727.00 $0.00 NRA 9 NA Replace ex. Conduits, power valves 820.10 8.26.10 8.26.10 $5,640.00 $0.00 SEI 10 NA Change insulation type (deduct) 820.10 8.26.10 8.26.10 - $3,090.00 $0.00 NRA 11 PR 12 Delete ice dam/add 10" kickplate (deduct) 10.14.10 - $6,065.00 $0.00 SEI 12 PR 13 New subfloor sand, demo piers in place 10.14.10 $9,295.00 $0.00 SEI 13 PR 5 Reuse existing fans (deduct) 10.14.10 - $624.00 NRA 14 PR 14 Dashers - steel angle, gap closure, etc 10.14.10 $20,368.00 SEI 15 PR 15 Air test pipe in place of hydro test 10.14.10 - $655.00 PR 10 Replace brine solution in West Rink $19.000.00 Estimate- waiting for pricing Extend retaining wall 20'+ fence $4,000.00 Estimate - waiting for pricing Additional concrete work at bleachers $10,338.00 Late submittal by contractor, under review Subtotal $107,209.00 1 $387422.00 Tesung ana son consultation: Atlas - Foundation Consultant for bleacher stabilization $46,930.00 Braun Intertec - material testing $18,000.00 (billed to date 8/20: $7,835) Subtotal of Other. $64,930.00 Design, Engineering, Inspection Design and Inspection (Rink Project) $138,000.00 Expenses (Rink Project) $7,000.00 ($6,034 on 9/21) Design and Inspection (Exterior Project) $9,980.00 Expenses (Exterior Project) $350.00 Subtotal of design, engineering, inspection $155,330.00 Other. Qwest- move phone line $6,040.12 Add glycol to East Rink so its at 35% (at Cool Airs Recommendation) $0.00 Emergency Repair Replace brine in West Rink (at Cool Airs Recommendation) $0.00 Included In project above Add inhibitor to boiler system (at Cool Airs Recommendation) $2,200.00 (estimated) Subtotal of Other expenses $8,240.12 Budget Summary Revenues GO Bonds $2,425,443.00 Stimulus Grant $220,000.00 Total Budget $2,645,443.00 Expenses Base Bid $2,180,540.00 Change Orders to date $107,209.00 Testing (from left) $64,930.00 Design (from left) $155,330.00 Other (from left) $8,240.12 Total Expenses $2,516,249.12 Balance Remaining $129,193.88 r 1 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. C. From: Marty Scheerer Fire Chief Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Portable EMS Ultrasound Systems Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: August 25, 2010 October 20, 2010 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. SonoSite 1. $ 20,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sonosite $ 20,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This request for purchase is for two portable SonoSite MicroMaxx 3.4.5 ultrasound systems that are utilized with our advanced life support ambulances on emergency medical calls. The two units have been leased by the fire department through a grant which has now expired.. These two machines are like new, having been exceptionally reliable and the quoted purchase price is $10,000 each. The list price for 2 new units is $84,700.00, a savings of $64,700.00 in purchasing these units vs. new. They come with a full five year warranty and additional training. SonoSite is the manufacturer of portable ruggedized ultrasound machines. Edina Fire is one of only a few EMS providers in the USA that performs ultrasound diagnostics. This procedure has proven to be an extremely valuable for improved patient care and outcomes. The Fire Department equipment fund would be used for this purchase. A $5000.00 grant from the Edina Community Foundation will be applied to this purchase, making the net cost $15,000.00 The Recomm within budget Fire Department Wallin, Finance Director mith, Interim City Manager F O1 HI Mee vroRP - ee REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.A &B. From: John Wallin ® Action Finance Director F-1 0 Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 . . Subject: Sale of Bonds — Resolution No. 2010 -106 Awarding the Sale of $9,225,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A and Resolution 2010 -107 Awarding the Sale of $2,595,000 G. O. Bonds, Series 2010B ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2010 -106 Providing for the Sale of $9,225,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A and Resolution 2010 -107 Providing for the Sale of $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 20108. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The $9,225,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A would refund the Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 which were originally issued for the City Hall and Police Facility. In February 2010 the City Council undertook the required steps to authorize the City to issue Capital Improvement Plan Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The estimated saving by this refunding would be approximately $90,000 per year beginning in the 2011 taxes payable year. The $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B has two purposes. The first purpose is to finance $2,355,000 of the 2010 street reconstruction projects. The second purpose of the bonds is to finance $240,000 in equipment purchases levied in the 2010 budget under equipment certificates. The bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, October 19. The bids and Ehlers & Associates analysis will be presented to the City Council at the October, 19 Council meeting. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2010 -106 Resolution 2010 -107 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $9,225,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, SERIES 2010A Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 19, 2010 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present- Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through 19 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-106 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $9,225,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, 1 SERIES 2010A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and'place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of October, 2010. Debra Mangen, City Clerk J It was reported that (__),proposals had been received prior to 10:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $9,225,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2010-106 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $9,225,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN'BONDS, SERIES 2010A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. On February 16, 2010, this Council held a public hearing on the questions of approving the adoption of amendments to its Capital Improvement Plan (the "Plan") and issuing General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds in the maximum principal amount of $9,500,000 (the "Bonds ") for the purpose of purchasing the city hall and a public safety facility (the "Project "), which Project is currently leased by the City from the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority "). The Project was originally financed with proceeds of the Authority's $12,410,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations) dated, as originally issued, as of January 16, 2002 (the "Refunded Bonds "). The total debt service on the Bonds is lower by at least $ than the debt service on the Refunded Bonds, and the present value of this reduction in debt service is not less than 3% of the debt service on the Refunded Bonds, exclusive of any premium, computed to their stated maturity dates, using the yield of the Bonds as the discount rate. No petition requesting a vote on the question of adopting the amendments to the Plan or issuing the Bonds has yet been filed. The sale of the Bonds to the Purchaser is hereby ratified on the terms provided herein, provided that no such petition is filed within thirty days of February 16, 2010. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the. Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (� proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received, at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of of , and.4ssociates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the, Mayor and the City Manager are. hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the_ Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful b'id'ders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03.: Performance of Requirements. All acts; conditions andihings which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State, of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and' in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to. provide security therefor and to..issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Bond Terms Registration; Execution and Delivery: 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A, shall be originally dated as of November 18, 2010, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30- day months, from November 18, 2010 until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate 2011 $780,000 2012 800,000 2013 805,000 2014 810,000 2015 820;000 2016 830,000 Year Amount Rate 2017 $840,000 2018 855,000 2019 I875,000 2020 895,000 2021 915,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1 2011, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint; and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: -2- (a) Re ig ster. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated Lost Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like -3- amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. 0) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Pang Agent. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. The Bonds are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: -4- Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for, redemption thereof to be published as required by law, and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (3 0) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds' to be redeemed at their addresses. as they appear on the bond register described in! Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at.which the Bonds are" to be surrendered for payment, which is the. principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become -due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest.] 2.06. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the Pty Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case an y officer whose signature. or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery, of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and' sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or- obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed.by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the,same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution' When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed'or printed in substantially the following form: -5- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BOND, SERIES 2010A 14,11 Interest Rate REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: Maturity Date of Date Original Issue CUSIP February 1, 20_ November 18, 2010 CEDE & CO. THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, without option of prior payment, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2011 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $9,225,000 issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 19, 2010 (the "Resolution "), to finance certain capital projects as described in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. This Bond is issued by authority of and in strict accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only in fully registered form, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. -6- [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. Notice of redemption shall be given as provided in the following paragraph. Prior to the date specified for the redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City will cause notice of the call for redemption to be published as required by law, and, not more than 60 days and not fewer than 30 days prior to the designated redemption date, will cause notice'of the call to be mailed to the registered owner of any Bond to be redeemed at the ownerr's address as it appears on the bond register maintained by the Registrar. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the owner without charge, representing the principal amount remaining outstanding.] The Bonds have been designated by the City as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shalt be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede. & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to -7- be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order,to. make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so, required; that, prior to'the' issuance hereof the City has levied ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, which taxes will be. collectible for the years; and in amounts sufficient to produce sums not less than five,percerit in excess of the principal of and interest, on the Bonds when due,, and has appropriated stich taxes to the payment of the. principal and interest; that if necessary for payment of the principal and interest, additional ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City,, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall.not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by, the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives: IN WITNESS : WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA City Manager Mayor -8- CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA ................. Custodian ...................... in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... TEN ENT -- as tenants (State) by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. W ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book - Entry System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the `Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a -10- principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to' Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall-have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to following:­ onership "interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any" DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC; of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. I The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by he securities depository in appropriate amounts, and, whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i)to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. " -11- (e) .Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest- on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively; to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided:in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial. Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book-Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements' with the securities depository described.herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2:03: Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all, arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. Use of Proceeds. Upon payment for the Bonds by the Purchaser, the Registrar shall deposit the proceeds of the Bonds and certain amounts with respect to the Refunded Bonds in accordance with the Escrow Agreement dated as of November 18, 2010 (the "Escrow Agreement "), between the City, the Authority and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent (the "Escrow Agent "), a banking institution whose deposits are insured by the Federal. Deposit Insurance Corporation and whose combined capital and surplus is not less than $500,000. The funds so deposited with respect to the refunding of the Refunded Bonds shall be invested in securities authorized for such - purpose by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subdivision 8, maturing on such dates and bearing interest at such rates as are required to .provide funds sufficient, with cash retained in the escrow account, to pay all principal and interest to become due on the Refunded Bonds to and including February 1, 2012 (the "Redemption Date ") and to pay and redeem the outstanding principal of the Refunded Bonds maturing after February 1, 2012 on the Redemption Date. The. Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to enter into the Escrow Agreement with the Escrow Agent establishing -the terms and conditions for the escrow account in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67. Section 4. Bond Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund ") `which the City agrees to maintain until the Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Bond Fund. The moneys on hand in the Bond Fund from time to time shall be used only to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Into the Bond Fund shall be paid: (a) the'amounts appropriated thereto pursuant to the Escrow Agreement; (b) all taxes collected pursuant to Section 5; (c) all excess amounts on deposit in the debt service and debt service reserve funds maintained for the payment of the Refunded Bonds upon the retirement of the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date; and (d) any other funds appropriated by the Council for the payment of the Bonds. -12- Section 5. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. In order to produce aggregate amounts not less than 5% in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are hereby levied on all taxable property id the City, the taxes to be levied and collected in the following years and amounts: Levy Years Collection Years Amount See attached levy calculation . The taxes shall be irrepealable as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the tax levies from other legally available funds, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are, authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and Maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 7. County Auditor Registration Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money Arbitrage and Official Statement. 7.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel.to the City, certified copies of all -13- proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 7.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations ") as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 7.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 7.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 7.06. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The City represents that in calendar year 2010 it does not reasonable expect to issue tax- exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $30,000,000, excluding any tax - exempt obligations which are refundings of a "qualified tax- exempt obligation" which are not taken into account for this purpose under Section 265(b)(3)(D)(ii) of the Code. 7.07. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated October _, 2010, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized of behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the -14- Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the . Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 8, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 8, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 8 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this Section 8, "Owner" or `Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any `Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, "Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 6 hereof. -15- (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and . Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ( "MSRB "). The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure -16- .. .._.. .. _....- __�.�... ..� :. ,. .,.... .. —:,a. .�._�__... ...i .. .._.- mss.- v +— .- .v -�..• _ _. _ _ Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then; from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 8 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure' Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non- payment related defaults; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Sub9titution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; (I) Bond calls; (I) Defeasances; (J) - Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and (K) Rating changes. As used herein, a "Material Fact" is a fact as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available ,to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a "Material Fact" is also an event that would be deemed "material" for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. conditions: (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or -17- (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) The City further agrees to make available, by electronic transmission, overnight delivery, mail or other means, as appropriate, the information described in subsection (b) to any rating agency then maintaining a rating of the Bonds at the request of the City and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time of transmission under paragraph (1) of this subsection (c), or, if such information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such information is to be released. (3) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 8 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 8 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 8 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 8 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as -18- provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 8 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 8 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 9. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to U.S. Bank & Trust Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Adopted this 19`h day of October, 2010. Attest: City Clerk -19- Mayor -20- COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on October 19, 2010, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $9,225,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2010A, dated as of November 18, 2010. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. (SEAL) WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of November, 2010. County Auditor CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $2,595,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2010B Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 19, 2010 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through 20 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-107 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $2,595,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2010B I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been.transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions ' and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. October, 2010. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that. (__) proposals had been received prior to 10:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2010-107 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $2,595,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2010B BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2005 -70, adopted on August 16, 2005, the City created a revolving fund as contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 7a, designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund, and established certain accounts within such Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. This Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B (the "Bonds ") for the purpose of (i) financing from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the cost of the construction of various local improvement projects designated as the Pamela Park Neighborhood, Braemar Hills Neighborhood, Bror Road, Moccasin Valley, Interlachen Circle Neighborhood, Interlachen Bluff Neighborhood and Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood (together, the Improvements); and (ii) financing the purchase of capital equipment by the City. The portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements are referred to as the "Improvement Bonds" and are issued pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 475, and the portion of the Bonds issued to finance the purchase of capital equipment by the City are designated as the "Equipment Bonds" and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301 and Chapter 475. The allocation of the Bonds for this purpose is set forth in Section 2.01 hereof. The amount of the Equipment Bonds does not exceed 0.25 percent of the market value of taxable property in the City. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (__) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of of , and associates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.05. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Improvement Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the assessments to be levied for the cost of the Improvements. Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B, shall be originally dated as of November 18, 2010, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, from November 18, 2010 until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate 2011 $80,000 2012 80,000 2013 300,000 2014 220,000 2015 225,000 2016 225,000 2017 230,000 2018 235,000 2019 240,000 2020 245,000 2021 255,000 2022 260,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. -2- i The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Improvement Bonds: Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 20,17 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Amount $220,000 220,000 225,000 225,000 230,000 235,000 240,000 245,000 255,000 260,000 The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Equipment Bonds: Year Amount - 2011 $ 80,000 2012 80,000 2013 80,000 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing. February .1, 2011, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at.its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed :by the registered owner. thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Reistrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the -3- transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall- authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers whiclidt, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat,the person in whose name any Bond is at any. time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen!or, lost, the Registrar shall deliver anew Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection,therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already -4- i matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. (j) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paving Agent. The, City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar.' The Mayor and City Manager: are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shalt be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2011 through 2018 shall not be subject to redemption prior to,maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2019 through 2022 shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2018 and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date); at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount] Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published as -5- required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution. Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, . executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2010B I� Interest Rate �o REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: Maturity Date of Date Original Issue CUSIP February 1, 20_ November 18, 2010 CEDE & CO. THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August I in each year, commencing February 1, 2011 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,595,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to serial number, maturity date, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 19, 2010 (the "Resolution "), to maintain the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund of the City, a permanent fund established for the financing of local improvements for which special assessments may be levied against property specifically benefited thereby, and to finance -7- the purchase of capital equipment by the City, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429 and 412.301 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2018 and earlier years are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 2019 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2018 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. Notice of redemption shall be given as provided in the following paragraph.] The Bonds have been designated by the City as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational 5:1 arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts; conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws .of the State-of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the improvements financed by the Bonds collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less. than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on such portion of the Bonds as such principal and.interest respectively become due, and has appropriated such special, assessments to the Revenue Account (the Revenue Account) of its Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund previously established by the City; and that, on or before each date the City is obligated to pay principal of or interest on such portion of the Bonds, the City will transfer from.its Revenue Account to 'a separate General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2010 Bond Fund an amount sufficient for the payment of such principal and - interest on such date; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied ad valorem taxes on all taxable property , in the City to pay the portion of the Bonds issued to finance the purchase of capital equipment by the City, which taxes will be collectible for the years and in amounts sufficient to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on such portion of the Bonds when due, and has appropriated such taxes to the payment of such principal and interest; that if necessary for payment of the principal and interest, additional ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed'on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. City Manager W CITY OF EDINA Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication:-, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations,' when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though tfiey'were� written out in full .'according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM as tenants. UTMA ................. Custodian ...................... in-common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act., .................. ,TEN ENT as tenants (State) by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common; Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. fffl! ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] 2.08. Use of Securities Depository' Book -Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the "Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a -11- principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed' Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. -12- (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City.and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. Use of Proceeds. 3.01. General Obligation Bonds Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2010B Construction Fund. The City hereby establishes as a special subaccount in the Construction Fund of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2010 Construction Fund (the "Series 2010 Construction Fund ") as a separate bookkeeping account on its books and records. There shall be deposited into the Series 2010 Construction Fund, when and as received, the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds allocated to the Improvement Bonds. There shall be established a separate account within the Series 2010 Construction Fund to record expenditures for each Improvement. The moneys in the Series 2010 Construction Fund will be disbursed by the City, in accordance with this Resolution and the City's normal procedures, to pay (or reimburse the City for) the costs of the Improvements, including also the issuance costs of the Improvement Bonds pursuant to Section 9 hereof. -At such time as the Improvements are completed the City shall transfer any remaining balance in the Series 2010 Construction Fund as provided in Resolution No. 2005 -70. 3.02. General Obligation Bonds Series 2010B Capital Equipment Fund. There is hereby established in the official books and records of the City, a separate General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B Capital Equipment Fund (the "Equipment Fund "). The City hereby appropriates to the Equipment Fund all proceeds of the Bonds received from the Purchaser allocated to the Equipment Bonds and to pay the issuance costs of the Equipment Bonds pursuant to Section 9 hereof. The Equipment Account shall be used solely to pay the costs of capital equipment (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301) having a useful life as long as the terms of the Equipment Bonds, and to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. After payment of all such costs, the Equipment Fund shall be discontinued and any proceeds of the Bonds remaining therein shall be credited to the Equipment Bond Fund described in Section 4.02 hereof. -13- - - Section 4. Bond Funds. 4.01. General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2010 Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City shall maintain a separate debt service fund on its official books and records to be known as the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2010 Bond Fund (the "Improvement Bond Fund ") within the Debt Service Account of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (the "Debt Service Account "), and the principal of and interest on the Improvement Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Improvement Bond Fund (a) all moneys transferred with respect to the Improvement Bonds from other accounts within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Debt Service Account in accordance with this Resolution; and (b) all other moneys as shall be appropriated by the City Council to the Bond Fund from time to time. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on the Improvement Bonds are to be paid by the City in accordance with this resolution, the City Finance Director shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Debt Service Account in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Improvement Bond Fund an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Improvement Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all Improvement Bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the City Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory limitation. 4.02. Equipment Bond Fund. The Equipment Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Equipment Bonds, Series 2010B Bond Fund (the "Equipment Bond Fund "), which the City agrees to maintain until the Equipment Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Equipment Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Equipment Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Equipment Bond Fund. There shall be credited to the Equipment Bond Fund all collections of any taxes levied for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Equipment Bonds, and any other funds appropriated by the City for the payment of the Equipment Bonds. Section 5. Pledge of Taxing Powers. 5.01. Levy of Special Assessments. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of each of the Improvements it will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20 %) of the cost of the Improvements. In the event that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by -14- the City or this Council or any of the City's officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. The Council presently estimates that the special assessments shall be in the principal amount of $ payable in not more than 10 installments, the first installment to be collectible with taxes during the year 2011, and that deferred installments shall bear interest at the rate of : %J' per annum from the date of the resolution levying said assessment until December 31 of the year in which the installment is payable. 5.02. Ad Valorem Taxes. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. In order to produce aggregate amounts not less than 5% in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Equipment Bonds, ad valorem taxes are hereby levied on all taxable:property in the City, the taxes to be levied and collected in the following years and amounts: Levy Years Collection Years Amount See attached levy calculation The taxes shall be irrepealable as long as any of the Equipment Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the tax levies from other legally available fiznds, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the,provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. -15- Section 7. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money, A.rbitrage'and Official Statement. 7.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk- is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such .'other information as the County Auditor shall require,'and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County, are hereby, authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to,Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the. facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 7.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of .1986, as amended (the "Code ") and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations ") as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, aid covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the 'Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any Ij nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds ",pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 7.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating" the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on'the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 7.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 7.06. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of -16- - - - - -- -- - interest expenses for financial institutions. The City represents that in calendar year 2010 it does not reasonable expect to issue tax- exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $30,000,000; excluding any tax - exempt obligations which are refundings of a "qualified tax- exempt obligation" which are not taken into account for this purpose under Section 265(b)(3)(D)(ii) of the Code. 7.07. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated October , 2010, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., Js hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates; Inc. is hereby authorized- of behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official 'Statement listing -the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 1562 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reas onable number of copies of the Official Statement and such. supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. 7.08. Reimbursement. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the financed facilities which the City paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the issuance of the Bonds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures, the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150 -2 of the Regulations, provided that a declaration of official intent shall not be required (i) with respect to certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the financed facilities meeting the requirements of Section 1.150- 2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to "preliminary expenditures" for the financed facilities as defined in Section 1.150- 2(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the "issue price" of the Bonds. Section 8. Continuing, Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the .public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission'(the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. -17- If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 8, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 8, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 8 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this Section 8, "Owner" or `Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any `Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, `Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 6 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be -18- unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. _ -.Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 8 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; -19- (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax- exempt status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; (I) Bond calls; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and (K) Rating changes. As used herein, a "Material Fact" is a fact as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a "Material Fact" is also an event that would be deemed "material" for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) The City further agrees to make available, by electronic transmission, overnight delivery, mail or other means, as appropriate, the information described in subsection (b) to any rating agency then maintaining a rating of the Bonds at the request -20- of the City and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time, of transmission under paragraph (1) of this subsection (c), or, if such information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such information' is to be released. (3) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Tenn, Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this. Section 8 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of theCity under this Section 8 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City.delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the - failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 8 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 8 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a), is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 8 as so amended or,supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the_time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and, (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 8 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. -21- Section 9 Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond pro, ceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to U.S. Bank & Trust Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's fmancial, advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Adopted this 1.9thAay of October, 2010. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -23- --------- ---- _:_�_� ---------- COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on October 19, 2010, by the City Council. of . the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $2,595,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B, dated as of November 18, 2010. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as -required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of November, 2010. County Auditor (SEAL) /1NA,r� ow e CbReea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.0 . From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Action Discussion ` Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -108 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -108 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -108 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Florence McHugh Barbara Richards Anonymous France 44 Cheese Shope Heather Randall King Michael Whitt Patricia Burrets Brad Beard Braemar Golf Course: Robert Malby Edina Fire Department: Edina Community Foundation Dated: October 19, 2010 Attest: $100.00 $25.00 $ 20.00 $148.50 $75.00 $25.00 $100.00 $150.00 $5,000.00 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Lisa Diehl Ken & Joan Hodges Linda Jeffrey Barbara Letourneau Jenny Benn Karen Nemer Bob Sauer & Robert Zoller $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $40.00 $80.00 $40.00 $120.00 Stone Lion Sculpture James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 day of www.cityofedina.com Cit932e%27 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 of Vu IU) 0 Ni •jvv• \fie REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.D. From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of October 6, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, October 6, 2010. BACKGROUND: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Review for October 6, 2010. a TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, October 6, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 6, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the October 19, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: Request to have Creek Valley Road east of Gleason Road designated as a "School Zone" roadway with reduced speed limit signs to modify the existing School Zone. Staff recommends approval of the request to have Creek Valley Road designated as a School Zone with reduced speed limit signs. See attached memorandum and map. 2. Request to remove the "Dead End" sign located on the center island at the intersection of Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place. This request comes from residents who feel the sign is no longer needed. Residents are in the process of planning a new look for this center island and feel the sign would be a distraction. The grass island (with curb) also has a street light and small tree. Staff feels that the sight lines are such that any motorist would immediately realize that this is a no- outlet street and see no reason to keep this sign on the center island. Staff recommends approval of the request to remove the "Dead End" sign from the center grass island at the intersection of Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 4 October 6, 2010 SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request to ban large trucks from Gleason Road north of W. 78th Street. This request comes from a resident on the 7600 block of Gleason Road who is concerned with the volume of large trucks that use Gleason Road. The requestor states that she sees semi - tractors, car carriers, etc. using Gleason Road at various times of the day. This stretch of Gleason Road is a residential area. Requestor is asking that Gleason Road be posted "Not a Truck Route" and enforce this ban. Gleason Road, from West 78`h Street north to Valley View Road is designated as a "Collector" street. As a result of this request, a traffic study was conducted for a period of seven full days and two half days. A total of 8,847 vehicles were counted during this period. The axel classification data showed that out of 8,847 vehicles, 24 were large trucks. Gleason Road has an average daily traffic count of 1,251 vehicles with an 85`h- percentile speed of 35.0 mph. Four property damage traffic accidents have been reported on this stretch of Gleason Road since 2001. Edina Police informed staff that the City of Edina has no designated truck routes within the City. Gleason Road is also a designated "State Aid" street and trucks cannot be banned from such roadways. of the i "' Street for lack of C 2. Request from South View Middle School to have the City place mid - street pedestrian crossing signs in the two pedestrian crosswalks in front of their building or otherwise enhance these crosswalks to make them more visible. . This request comes from the school as a result of a recent hit and run accident to a parked vehicle as well as concerns for the safety of students. In the past, the City has placed mid- street signs at these two locations. However, parking is also allowed at these crosswalks which make the driving lanes narrower. The signs are no longer placed at these two locations because they were continuously hit by school busses making turns from St. Andrews Avenue and Dalrymple road and were badly damaged. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 4 October 6, 2010 The crosswalks in question are the new in -lay design and are properly signed. There are also advanced warning signs alerting motorists in both directions. The City was forced to put up "Do Not Park in Crosswalk" signs due to the fact that parents were parking on the crosswalks while waiting to pick up their children. Staff has had discussions 'with school officials and suggested several alternatives to make sure students use these crosswalks and that motorists, most of them parents picking up students, yield to the pedestrians. Staff suggested a "Blitz" to educate parents and students alike by handing out flyers and contacting parents via e- mails, etc. It was suggested that more staff be present during start/end times and students who violated crossing rules be handed a "form" that had to be read and signed by both the student and parent and then returned. Staff has observed parents dropping off students in the middle of the block with the student crossing there and not going to the crosswalk. Staff feels that educating both the students and the parents would make crossing the street much safer. Staff feels that these crosswalks are well marked and signed and that signs placed in the middle of the street would continue to be damaged. The signs cost $265.00 each and weighs about 60 lbs. These bus /sign accidents also cause damage to the busses. Staff recommends the denial of the request for mid - street pedestrian signs for the above stated reasons. 3. Request to enhance the bus stop located in front of 4942 France Avenue by painting the curb yellow to prevent motorists from parking there. This request comes from an employee of the barber shop at the above location who states that motorists will frequently park at the bus stop and leave their vehicle unattended for a few minutes to use one of the businesses. If a bus comes along traffic is tied up while the bus uses the driving lane to pick up and drop off passengers. Requestor feels that a painted curb would make this no parking zone more visible. Hennepin County has always denied our requests for any changes to the 50`h and France area. Staff is of the opinion that a painted curb would not prevent someone from parking their vehicle and that the paint would not be visible during the winter months. Also, painting this curb would not be consistent with other bus stops. Staff feels that strict enforcement at this bus stop would be a better solution. The EPD states it will make enforcement here a priority. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 4 October 6, 2010 Staff recommends the denial of the request to paint the curb at the bus stop in front of 4942 France Avenue for the above stated reasons. 4. Request to ban all bicycle traffic from City sidewalks. This request comes from a resident on Comanche Court who had a near miss with an adult on a bicycle while crossing Highway 62 on Gleason Road. He states the sidewalk narrows at the bridge over Highway 62 and a bicyclist almost hit him as he was walking on the sidewalk. The Edina Police Department's Traffic Enforcement Supervisor states that Edina does not have a City Ordinance that bans bicycle riders from sidewalks. In fact, he stated that officers would much rather see children riding on sidewalks, where provided, than in the streets. Staff recommends the denial of the request to ban bicycles from City sidewalks for lack of City Code. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request to enhance the four way stop signs on Maloney Avenue at Arthur Street to make them more visible. This street is scheduled for reconstruction. 2. Request for painted pedestrian crosswalks at all intersections on France Avenue that are controlled by traffic lights from West 501' Street to Highway 494. Consult with Hennepin County & City of Minneapolis. 3. Request for a "No Parking Here to Alley" sign to be placed adjacent to the alley just to the west of 4409 Country Club Road. Survey letter to be sent. 4. Request to do something about the high traffic volumes on Tracy Avenue at Valley View Road to make it easier to make left turns during peak hours. Further review and study. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 4 October 6, 2010 e 31W tnnancements Creek Valley Elementary School School � • Existing Signs 'Roadway Existing Sidewalk • -�._w. - Speed Zone Study City of Edina, Minnesota , . 2009 Sign g n Installation Existing Crosswalk - -- Other Existing Walkway Feet N OC 80 0 125 250 500 (A O �aaa i DATE: October 8, 2010 CITY OF EDINA TO: Boyd Tate — Traffic Safety Coordinator FROM: Jack Sullivan '� SUBJECT: Creek Valley School — 20mph Speed Zone Revisions -At the request of Traffic Safety Committee, staff has reviewed the School Speed Zone near Creek Valley Elementary School. The original study was completed in July of 2009 signage has been in place since August of 2009. Staff is recommending extending the 20 mph school speed zone to include the southeast side of the school along Creek Valley Road to Nordic Circle and the majority of Nordic Circle. Please see the attached graphic titled "Creek Valley School — 20 mph Speed Zone Revisions" dated Oct. 8, 2010 for the types and locations of the proposed signage. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School\ 20101009 _Creek_Valley_Revisions.doc OPi �t� Revised and approved by Council: cn Section B.1 — Staff's recommendation. v � �y •'^'roxaoRn'�° • ,eae REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.D. From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of October 6, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, October 6, 2010. BACKGROUND: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Review for October 6, 2010. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, October 6, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 6, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the October 19, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: 1. Request to have, Creek Valley Road east of Gleason Road designated as a "School Zone" roadway with reduced speed limit signs to modify the existing School Zone. Staff recommends approval of the request to have Creek Valley Road designated as a School Zone with reduced speed limit signs. See attached memorandum and map. 2. Request to remove the "Dead End" sign located on the center island at the intersection of Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place. This request comes from residents who feel the sign is no longer needed. Residents are in the process of planning a new look for this center island and feel the sign would be a distraction. The grass island (with curb) also has a street light and small tree. Staff feels that the sight lines are such that any motorist would immediately realize that this is a no- outlet street and see no reason to keep this sign on the center island. Staff recommends approval of the request to remove the "Dead End" sign from the center grass island at the intersection of Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 4 October 6, 2010 SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request to ban large trucks from Gleason Road north of W. 78th Street. This request comes from a resident on the 7600 block of Gleason Road who is concerned with the volume of large trucks that use Gleason Road. The requestor states that she sees semi - tractors, car carriers, etc. using Gleason Road at various times of the day. This stretch of Gleason Road is a residential area. Requestor is asking that Gleason Road be posted "Not a Truck Route" and enforce this ban. Gleason Road, from West 78th Street north to Valley View Road is designated as a "Collector" street. As a result of this request, a traffic study was conducted for a period of seven full days and two half days. A total of 8,847 vehicles were counted during this period. The axel classification data showed that out of 8,847 vehicles, 24 were large trucks. Gleason Road has an average daily traffic count of 1,251 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 35.0 mph. Four property damage traffic accidents have been reported on this stretch of Gleason Road since 2001. Edina Police informed staff that the City of Edina has no designated truck routes within the City. Gleason Road is also a designated "State Aid" street and trucks cannot be banned from such roadways. Staff recommends the denial of the request to ban all large trucks from Gleason Road north of West 78th Street because Gleason Road is a designated State Aid street. 2. Request from South View Middle School to have the City place mid - street pedestrian crossing signs in the two pedestrian crosswalks in front of their building or otherwise enhance these crosswalks to make them more visible. This request comes from the school as a result of a recent hit and run accident to a parked vehicle as well as concerns for the safety of students. In the past, the City has placed mid - street signs at these two locations. However, parking is also allowed at these crosswalks which make the driving lanes narrower. The signs are no longer placed at these two locations because they were continuously hit by school busses making turns from St. Andrews Avenue and Dalrymple road and were badly damaged. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 4 October 6, 2010 The crosswalks in question are the new in -lay design and are properly signed. There are also advanced warning signs alerting motorists in both directions. The City was forced to put up "Do Not Park in Crosswalk" signs due to the fact that parents were parking on the crosswalks while waiting to pick up their children. Staff has had discussions with school officials and suggested several alternatives to make sure students use these crosswalks and that motorists, most of them parents picking up students, yield to the pedestrians. Staff suggested a "Blitz" to educate parents and students alike by handing out flyers and contacting parents via e- mails, etc. It was suggested that more staff be present during start/end times and students who violated crossing rules be handed a "form" that had to be read and signed by both the student and parent and then returned. Staff has observed parents dropping off students in the middle of the block with the student crossing there and not going to the crosswalk. Staff feels that educating both the students and the parents would make crossing the street much safer. Staff feels that these crosswalks are well marked and signed and that signs placed in the middle of the street would continue to be damaged.. The signs cost $265.00 each and weighs about 60 lbs. These bus /sign accidents also cause damage to the busses. Staff recommends the denial of the request for mid - street pedestrian signs for the above stated reasons. Request to enhance the bus stop located in front of 4942 France Avenue by painting the curb yellow to prevent motorists from parking there. This request comes from an employee of the barber shop at the above location who states that motorists will frequently park at the bus stop and leave their vehicle unattended for a few minutes to use one of the businesses. If a bus comes along traffic is tied up while the bus uses the driving lane to pick up and drop off passengers. Requestor feels that a painted curb would make this no parking zone more visible. Hennepin County has always denied our requests for any changes to the 50`h and France area. Staff is of the opinion that a painted curb would not prevent someone from parking their vehicle and that the paint would not be visible during the winter months. Also, painting this curb would not be consistent with other bus stops. Staff feels that strict enforcement at this bus stop would be a better solution. The EPD states it will make enforcement here a priority. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 4 October 6, 2010 Staff recommends the denial of the request to paint the curb at the bus stop in front of 4942 France Avenue for the above stated reasons. 4. Request to ban all bicycle traffic from City sidewalks. This request comes from a resident on Comanche Court who had a near miss with an adult on a bicycle while crossing Highway 62 on Gleason Road. He states the sidewalk narrows at the bridge over Highway 62 and a bicyclist almost hit him as he was walking on the sidewalk. The Edina Police Department's Traffic Enforcement Supervisor states that Edina does not have a City Ordinance that bans bicycle riders from sidewalks. In fact, he stated that officers would much rather see children riding on sidewalks, where provided, than in the streets. Staff recommends the denial of the request to ban bicycles from City sidewalks for lack of City Code. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request to enhance the four way stop signs on Maloney Avenue at Arthur Street to make them more visible. This street is scheduled for reconstruction. 2. Request for painted pedestrian crosswalks at all intersections on France Avenue that are controlled by traffic lights from West 50th Street to Highway 494. Consult with Hennepin County & City of Minneapolis. 3. Request for a "No Parking Here to Alley" sign to be placed adjacent to the alley just to the west of 4409 Country Club Road. Survey letter to be sent. 4. Request to do something about the high traffic volumes on Tracy Avenue at Valley View Road to make it easier to make left turns during peak hours. Further review and study. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 4 October 6, 2010 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 8, 2010 CITY OF EDINA TO: Boyd Tate — Traffic Safety Coordinator FROM: Jack Sullivan '� SUBJECT: Creek Valley School — 20mph Speed Zone Revisions -At the request of Traffic Safety Committee, staff has reviewed the School Speed Zone near Creek Valley Elementary School. The original study was completed in July of 2009 signage has been in place since August of 2009. Staff is recommending extending the 20 mph school speed zone to include the southeast side of the school along Creek Valley Road to Nordic Circle and the majority of Nordic Circle. Please see the attached graphic titled "Creek Valley School — 20 mph Speed Zone Revisions" dated Oct. 8,'2010 for the types and locations of the proposed signage. G: \Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School\20101009_Creek Valley_Revisions.doc 02 111AII-1 V E' ''i 4 END 7 F SCHOOL 7 .$14 M SCHOOL 4,� 7_ Al MEN CHILDREN AREPRES 7` N W % .7 -Creek Z' Z)LKUUL Z 1 . S PEE Valley' CT v q Element IM IT u 'Scho 20 MEN CHILDREN E PRESENT EN -y T SPEED t1Z4 LIMIT 411 r h l � '� '+��5,�'` ®� L CreekaValley7Rds�, -° ui 'Z7 fAl -­4 CHILDREN ZJNOZ A 1OOH3S 4 ON3 .r T aff 0- w TV �F H=T k - 'E 1t q 7, ,fir 77 X X�VIZI B 6 n 57 - 'r T A,�N, 7 o�� -Site Enhancements Existing Signs 'Roadway N Creek Valley Elementary School Oc4-. — Existing Sidewalk Fedt 80 School Speed Zone Study 2009 Sign - Existing Crosswalk 90/6 U, City of Edina, Minnesota Installation - Other Existing Walkway: 0 125 250 500 1. [WNNE60TA, 0 Mc a33 ca4 /o1, O a' /w �ro� 5 `° SCHOOL 1N353bdH bb 4�� SPEED 3w� ENO L IMIT o z SCHOOL 20 11 Wl� ZONE 433dS �j5 roiwa + IOOH0S �o� �S„PPE,E•„ Creek HSCHOOL Valley Elementary �Q,a so School 20 NordicTCir OQ P'o O Yom a� SCHOOL rND SPEED ZONE LIMIT 20 C4 ,- CreekaV511ey Rd Cn - FEl ARE PRLSE.IT SCHOOL rM u Cz z R• G z° BalderdFn SCHOOL Site Enhancements N c 8 `ti`' ^`�� � • Existing Signs Roadway e Creek Valley Elementary School g g Feet o (( l Existing Sidewalk School Speed Zone Study 2009 Sign Existing Crosswalk 0 125 250 50 o 90 /0 City of Edina, Minnesota ® installation Other Existing Walkway olte REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion El Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -109, Set Improvement Public Hearing Date (November 16, 2010) for Ridge Road Improvements: No. BA -384. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached resolution calling for Public Hearing on November 16, 2010 for roadway improvements for Ridge Road — Improvement No. BA -384. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting these street improvements based on the condition of the street and also at the request of the adjacent property owners. Staff and consultant, SEH, Inc. has been working with the residents to arrive at a consensus for the design of the roadway. Staff will be meeting with the residents on October 27. However, to keep the project budget and schedule on task, we are asking to set the project improvement hearing date for November 16, 2010. The feasibility study will be submitted prior to the project public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2010 -109. g: \engineering \improvements \ba384 ridge road (formerly a- 199) \admin \legal \item no. iv. e. resolution no. 2010 -109, set improvement public hearing date (november 16,2010) for ridge road improvements no ba384.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-109 SET PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 16, 2010 FOR RIDGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -384 City of Edina NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 16th day of November, 2010, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider street improvements on Ridge Road, Improvement No. BA -384. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: October 19, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 �k 0 Vo YroRPoao` 1988 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F] Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -110 Accepting Right -of -Way Acquisition Offer from MNDOT for TH169/1494 Interchange Project Recommendation: Approve attached Resolution No. 2010 -110 Accepting Right -of -Way offer from MNDOT for permanent and temporary easements for the TH169 / 1494 interchange project. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) has coordinated the efforts of the design build process for reconstructing the TH169/1494 Interchange Project. The review of the three finalists has occurred along with the opening of the bids. The next step for the three cities involved is to finalize the outstanding agreements in order to award the bid. MNDOT has identified the to acquire a permanent and temporary easement from the City of Edina to construct this interchange. The total revenue for this acquisition is $21,600; $4,500 is for a permanent easement and $17,100 is for temporary easement. These parcels are located between the existing frontage road (south of Braemar Ice Arena) and TH169. These takings do not affect the operation of the frontage road. The City Assessor has reviewed the valuation report and concurs with this offer. If this offer is acceptable to the City Council then the final paper work will be prepared for the Mayor and City Manager to sign. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2010 -110. • Offer Letter dated October 8, 2010 • Legal Description of Takings • Plan View of Takings • Sample of "Offer to Sell and Memorandum of Conditions" • Sample of "Warranty Deed" g:\ engineering\ infrastructure \streets \mndot \169 494 interchange \2010 issue \resolution \item iv f resolution no. 2010 -110 accepting right -of -way acquisition offer from mndot for th169 i494 interchange project.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-110 PTING RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISISTION OFFER FROM MNDOT FOR TH169/1494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT S.P. 2776 -03 City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has cooperatively worked with the Department of Transportation to pursue the reconstruction of the TH169/1494 Interchange Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.164, the City of Edina previously held a public hearing in 2006 to ..consider layout approval and subsequent Municipal Consent of said improvements; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent was granted for the 1- 494/TH -169 project on December 19, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City of Edina is authorized to accept the right -of -way acquisition offer from the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) for $21,600; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager is authorized to execute all agreements pertaining to this acquisition. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 16 5 ��N "esoryyo Minnesota Department of Transportation '' Metropolitan District oFraa`' .1500 rWest County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 -3174 Date: cr < n 1() City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 In reply refer to: S.P.: 2776 -03 C.S.: 2772 (169 =005) 903 Job: T9F129A County: Hennepin Parcel: 208 - City of Edina Property Address: 7501 Ikola Way Edina, MN 55349 The State of Minnesota, through the Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT), is acquiring part of your property for the improvement of Trunk Highway 169. The person delivering this letter is a real estate specialist representing Mn /DOT. This individual will explain the procedures involved in the acquisition process. The State's valuation report is included with this letter. The monetary damage to your property due to this acquisition is $21,600.00, this being the State's certified offer; this amount includes $4,500.00 for the real estate being acquired and $17,100.00 for the loss in value to the remaining property. Please be advised that lawful owners and /or occupants of the property on the date of this offer may be entitled to relocation assistance /benefits in accordance with Federal and State laws. It is important that you read the information provided in the purchase packet. It will help you to understand your rights during the acquisition process and also to assist you in making sound decisions. Offer Letter — Partial Real Estate & Damages An equal opportunity employer DP1001 8/12/2010 As the acquisition of your property proceeds, you will undoubtedly have additional questions. Please direct them to the Mn /DOT representative who submitted this offer. Sincerely, Tom O'Keefe, P.E. Director Metro District Program Delivery Package Contents: "Guide for Property Owners" Booklet Legal Description describing acquisition Offer to Sell and Memorandum of Conditions (reference copy if applicable) Conveyance Instrument (reference copy if applicable) "Relocation Assistance" Booklet (if applicable) Valuation Report Appraisal Reimbursement Claim form Acquisition Incidental Claim form Plat map (if applicable) Parcel sketch Receipt of Valuation Report: Date: /0/15 Zo / O Owner: c Offer Letter — Partial Real Estate & Damages DP1001 8/12/2010 August 12, 2010 FEE ACQUISTION Parcel 208 C.S. 2772 (169 =005) 903 S.P. 2776 -03 All of the following: r OTCO .1 !P MY", That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 21 West, shown as Parcel 208 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered.27 -196 as -the same is on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 405358; containing 0.26 acre, more or less; together with other rights as set forth below; forming and being part of said Parcel 208: Access: All right of access as shown on said plat by the access control symbol; Temporary Easement: A temporary easement for highway purposes as shown on said plat as to said Parcel 208 by the temporary easement symbol, said easement shall cease on December 1, 2015, or on such earlier date upon which the Commissioner of Transportation determines by formal order that it is no longer needed for highway purposes. Tax & Assessment Data Page 2 of 2 DP1022 8/12/2010 r'nrnoz- oN.leuwal. i ERMAN Foo No B MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION mr9 MAINTENANCE EASEMC RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 27 -196 FROM TO DISTANCE(FT) AZIMUTH 019R19 81962 19.0 ii0.61•0l• CONTROL SECTION NO. 2772(169 =5)903 1O 810623 B2. 61.21 1.91.09• -m' 121 122 I.T.06 sscM 224• IN THE SOUTHOEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.116 N., R.21 1Y., �y IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.116 N., R.21 W., HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA rY1.'a`:isi o c uiv •e•_ -__ „per._ . -lt.� , ___2w•._.______. __., m.__ r ®w N. T To .1. T...1 ai•u• yN 819921 1 ' OA.9NINGTg1 mai Lll¢ fw. i T.E. P .201 T.E.-PAR. 2W8 AYEMIE s” ig A y �•i.u�°•0 u'im °6 i•efR°i]pl _.__ _.__ kn "W"t.4 q5 _ g" TRACT E TRACT 0 TRACT c + I TMCT B TRACT A TAT E TRACT D g'3 R.L.S. a N0. 5 AI 1283 R.L.S. N0. 1253 H VIE 2 To. W11— °v Z7 CITY rw.JO9 1 ,m„ • —• R /IY 819608 -GAR L.� :a �� : o¢� tia i.E• PAP. -" - ma. PARCEL 309A v , FooTlxc AND IeuL �� ° f•' ice° ' N0. ' EMASNEY Y mT. E.I�AN. IOU • —. m RSa• 6 9 ' PAP. 201 _� m as 81962] a PARCEL 20 pdi HIGHWAY I OF m 819619 m •_ s • RCE L 209 � ".__ u T. H •- ________ps9�_______, R/P! E TAT9T• r.f• ,u M 819609 m FOOTING AND WALL PARCEL 208 _. TRACT G MIMENANCE �•• �~ o EASEMENT PAN. 204A T.E. PAR. 202 g/fl T.E•PM•2 rAOluflmian2 a EDINA -� a: sa m 1 mn ng STD (A s a THE TIM OF TRUNK OF TRANSPNITar10N IS THE DESIGNATING THE IM LOCATILE OF NORTH I HME CY NO. IT' ED FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION T TO 0 9 MILES NORTH 11. ME CITY of EDINA Ds• , =� I V1 MG ,�• 81961 �/ d ml !R a f %0 � 8 9 •, 9 C RIGHT OF RAY IN REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1283 PARCEL OWNER LOCATION m1 °` j� rwlrlr es L�}1�i�J�a2/J L9D�395�'S -iN0 . Tom` CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS m ��� M Parwl Nom. �� �, `�_ SURVEY STarmAl105 DOC. NO.4150Io 76 k L;�° — . ,�•;;,,„ „�_ wr um u°..•m mee ••n°., rl.nm, me eln.ti. e. m.a m rm wmrr r.:elpm. o•rm• 11 11 C•u,�r •'v ^„°a OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF TITLES J- IES .. ,n cOr �_ nr ?re� p`u.. mn” �_ e.,,e:r e•�,• N,....� .n.. p1., n... e.., rl.1e a,.r,r r: 1•••.1x. Tm 1• r.r rr 1..°.pro PmHIm r• 0.10 x."n ,.:almrr wn mm. ..wN r•r rrromrixw 1752 -014 IHENNpEEPgIN cCEOUTN[TYY� MNIN7NESHOITA �p HASEBEEN FIREOF TNTTH 1ST OFF CE T� 4TH 2010 ATT ;� vx'r to.s,r - -1,L_ _ _ -ZOAL 309A BASS LAKE PROPERTIES, LLC. TRACT B G C 13140211 T02 1 190i - - i,a,rosrm xETRG ¢. ....EN i =lr eP"OGG... RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 7 W1/2 SWIM - qlFF z� • FM REMiNEER OF PARCEL 201 SEE PLAT 27 -199 NOTE, TEMPORARY COMIIISSLONER'S ORDERS IN PIIBI.IC ROOS WILL EXPIRE ON 12-01 -2019 �i •i•"•4 ei w a TMV ui 'mim°°O. � •, iu•m �°ef°m°•i'NU' m•�u °iree`mrt=. ei,n •�. 'n ro° �IP1I.S. PLAT 27 -196 ma w ��ii�`niio..�°°.••�°�°M•r i'�� u�lmr o}Trv�meYa,Im •.dasNw � �G s�j� ore o .im'�r •i ir.Q� °o.i i.ny - umn pl,rnn e•r��p• ' ;: °:: y�/�:q�.(�°°'.:a e:� � a:i w ; r , : 'o n° {; 7 :Iga.T n.'504— a%., 25157 ELI� M�D aq il�m{°� v�i,m�}• ItmLwr• n q�°e• si•MS� �o °im° mi 'ni'oiiOp'a`��a•i°�`�Cin�IYOH� Ntiw R l w _ e.�•..;�, .r rn. �,H w..� • m. f �. —/ j� rwlrlr es L�}1�i�J�a2/J L9D�395�'S -iN0 . Tom` CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS m ��� M Parwl Nom. �� �, `�_ SURVEY STarmAl105 DOC. NO.4150Io 76 k L;�° — . ,�•;;,,„ „�_ wr um u°..•m mee ••n°., rl.nm, me eln.ti. e. m.a m rm wmrr r.:elpm. o•rm• 11 11 C•u,�r •'v ^„°a OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF TITLES sir i,Imw „mpi'ery prp— _ —__— .. ,n cOr �_ nr ?re� p`u.. mn” �_ e.,,e:r e•�,• N,....� .n.. p1., n... e.., rl.1e a,.r,r r: 1•••.1x. Tm 1• r.r rr 1..°.pro PmHIm r• 0.10 x."n ,.:almrr wn mm. ..wN r•r rrromrixw p •..m ° I ,Co Ym,x ,°:iui�w�•�� r° ,x,pDwi.•. ° °'�° `� ° n0 IHENNpEEPgIN cCEOUTN[TYY� MNIN7NESHOITA �p HASEBEEN FIREOF TNTTH 1ST OFF CE T� 4TH 2010 ATT ;� vx'r to.s,r - -1,L_ _ _ a• px.rry r%nv� — „� 6 a.r.N• ar wl....y •.nmr rn. x...ilw f••rIm m rir mm.•e.a�pw�r�r .r LLEY UUN MAV .LD IN CAB. ND._ dlNUq A... ..on *- 7.9.6 -- i,a,rosrm xETRG ¢. ....EN i =lr eP"OGG... 015},11 Sa SXDm i0 r[[T Iil, •D [LL 1 ,00 [ML'T YLLW9. PLAT No. zT -196 REGISTRAR OF TITLES C.S. 2772116931907 Office of Land Management (2 -98) STATE OF MINNESOTA . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Supervisor of Direct Purchase APPROVED OFFER TO SELL AND MEMORANDUM OF CONDITIONS By C.S.: 2772(169=005)903 Parcel: 208 County: Hennepin Owners and addresses: City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424; For a valuable consideration, on this day.of ,theundemigned owners hereby offer to sell and convey to the State of Minnesota for a total consideration of Dollars ($_ )a fee simple title tothe real estate or an interest therein situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described in the copy of the instrument of conveyance hereto attached. The undersigned parties have this day executed an instrument for the conveyance of the aforesaid real estate or an interest therein to the State of Minnesota, and have conditionally delivered the same to the State of Minnesota, which instrument shall have no effect until and unless this offer to sell and convey is accepted in writing by the Office of Land Management of the Minnesota Department of Transportation within days from the date of this offer. Such notice of acceptance shall be by certified mail directed to the address appearing after our signatures hereto. If this offer is not so accepted within the time limited herein such conveyance shall be of no effect, and said instrument s' forthwith be returned to the undersigned owners. If this offer is accepted it is mutually agreed by and between the owners and the State as follows: (1) Possession of the real estate shall transfer to the State days after the date of acceptance. The owners shall have the right to continue to occupy the property or to rent same to the present occupants or others until the date of transfer of possession. Any change in occupancy shall be subject to approval and concurrence by the State. On or before the date for transfer or possession the owners will vacate the real estate and the improvements (if any) located thereon, or cause same to be vacated, remove all personal effects therefrom and have all utilities (if any) shut off by the supplier of same. No buildings appurtenances or other non - personal items or fixtures will be removed from the premises by the owners or renters, including plumbing and heating fixtures, etc. The owners shall notify the Department of Transportation as soon as the improvements are vacated. The owners will maintain the improvements during their period of occupancy and will make all necessary repairs at their own expense. The State's prospective bidders for the purchase or demolition of the improvements on the property shall have the right of entry for inspection purposes during the last 10 days of possession by the owners. (2) Title to said real estate shall pass to the State of Minnesota as of the date of said acceptance subject to conditions hereinafter stated. (3) Buildings (if any) on said real estate shall be insured by the owners against loss by fire and windstorm in the amount of present coverage or if none in force then in an amount not less than the current market value during the entire period of the owners' occupancy of the buildings on the real estate, such policy or policies of insurance to be endorsed to show the State's interest. (4) If the State of Minnesota is acquiring all or a major portion of the property, mortgages (if any) on the property shall be satisfied in full by the State of Minnesota. The amount paid by the State of Minnesota to satisfy said mortgage(s) shall be deducted from the amount to be paid to the owners under the terms of this agreement. The amount paid by the State of Minnesota to satisfy the mortgage(s) shall include interest on the mortgage(s) to date that payment is made to the mortgage holder. (5) If the State of Minnesota is acquiring only a minor portion of the property, and the property is encumbered by a mortgage, it shall be the responsibility of the owners to furnish a partial release of mortgage. The mortgage holderwill be included as a payee along with the owners on the check drawn in payment for the property. Any fee charged by the mortgage holder for the partial release of mortgage must be paid for by the owners. (6) The owners will pay all delinquent (if any) and all current real estate taxes, whether deferred or not, which area lien against the property. Current taxes shall include those payable in the calendar year in which this document is dated. The owners will also pay in full any special assessments, whether deferred or not, which are a lien against the property. The owners' obligation to pay deferred taxes and assessments shall continue after the sale and shall not merge with the delivery and acceptance of the deed. (7) If encumbrances, mechanics liens or other items intervene before the date the instrument of conveyance is presented for recording and same are not satisfied or acknowledged by the owners as to validity and amount and payment thereof authorized by the owners, said instrument of conveyance shall be returned to the owners. (8) Payment to the owners shall be made in the due course of the State's business after payment of taxes, assessments, mortgages and all other liens or encumbrances against said real estate. The owners will not be required to vacate the property until the owners have received payment. (9) No payments shall be made of any part of the consideration for said sale until marketable title is found to be in the owners and until said instrument of conveyance has been recorded. (10) The owners hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the instrument of conveyance executed by them on this date, and a copy of this offer and memorandum. (11) It is understood that unless otherwise hereinafter stated the State acquires all appurtenances belonging to the premises including: OWNERS CITY OF EDINA By Its And Its (Address of Owner where acceptance is to be mailed.) WARRANTY DEED STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: For and in consideration of the sum of COPY C.S. 2772 (169 =005) 903 Parcel 208 County of Hennepin Dollars ($ ), City of Edina, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, Grantor, hereby conveys and warrants to the State of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: All of the following: That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 21 West, shown as Parcel 208 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 27 -196 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 405358; containing 0.26 acre, more or less; together with other rights as set forth below, forming and being part of said Parcel 208: Access: All right of access as shown on said plat by the access control symbol; Temporary Easement: A temporary easement for highway purposes as shown on said plat as to said Parcel 208 by the temporary easement symbol, said easement shall cease on December 1, 2015, or on such earlier date upon which the Commissioner of Transportation determines by formal order that it is no longer needed for highway purposes. together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. Subject to mineral rights and utility easements of record, if any. Check box if applicable: ❑ The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. ❑ I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. Page 1 of 2 CITY OF EDINA By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by and the and of City of Edina, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: This instrument was drafted by the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, Metro Right of Way, Roseville, MN 55113 Send tax statements to Grantee: State of Minnesota Department of Transportation METRO DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY 1500 W. County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Okite •lam v • REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: October 19, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -111 Approving Permit to Construct within City Right -of- Way for TH169/1494 Interchange Project Recommendation: Approve attached Resolution No. 2010 -111 Approving permit to construct within City right - of -way for the TH169 /1494 interchange project. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) has coordinated the efforts of the design build process for reconstructing the TH169/1494 Interchange Project. The review of the three finalists has occurred along with the opening of the bids. The next step for the three cities involved is to finalize the outstanding agreements in order to award the bid. MNDOT has identified the need to construct within City Right -of -Way. The prior agenda item accepted the acquisition offer from MNDOT for the permanent taking of right -of -way and the temporary easements for this construction. This permit will allow MNDOT to move forward with the construction prior to finalizing the easement documents between the City of Edina and MNDOT. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2010 -111. • Temporary Permit to Construct — C.S. 2772 (169 =005) 903 g:\ engineering\ infrastructure \streets \mndot \169 494 interchange \2010 issue \resolution \item iv g resolution no. 2010-111 approving permit to construct within city right -of -way for th 169 i494 interchange project.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-111 APPROVING TEMPORARY PERMIT TO CONSTUCT TH16911494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT WITHIN CITY OF EDINA RIGHT -OF -WAY City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has cooperatively worked with the Department of Transportation to pursue the reconstruction of the TH169/1494 Interchange Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §161.164, the City of Edina previously held a public hearing in 2006 to consider layout approval and subsequent Municipal Consent of said improvements; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent was granted for the 1- 494/TH -169 project on December 19, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City of Edina is allowing the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (MNDOT) to work within City Right -of -Way per Temporary Permit to Construct — C.S. 2772 (169 =005) 903; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Interim City Manager is authorized to sign the Temporary Permit to Construct — C.S. 2772 (169 =005) 903. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 TEMPORARY PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT C.S. 2772 (169 =005) 903 Parcel 208 Dated: October 6, 2010 County of Hennepin The State of Minnesota has by its Commissioner of Transportation established and designated the route of Trunk Highway No. 169 in Hennepin County, Minnesota. It is necessary that the State of Minnesota use for highway purposes real property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: All of the following: That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 21 West, shown as Parcel 208 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 27 -196 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 405358; containing 0.26 acre, more or less; together with other rights as set forth below, forming and being part of said Parcel 208: Access: All right of access as shown on said plat by the access control symbol; Temporary Easement: A temporary easement for highway purposes as shown on said plat as to said Parcel 208 by the temporary easement symbol, said easement shall cease on December 1, 2015, or on such earlier date upon which the Commissioner of Transportation determines by formal order that it is no longer needed for highway purposes. The undersigned, having an interest in the above described real property, understand that they are not required to surrender possession of real property without just compensation and are not required to surrender lawfully occupied real property without at least 90 days notice. For a valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby waive these rights and give the State of Minnesota an immediate right of entry and permit to construct and realign TH 169 and the TH 169 frontage road. This Permit will expire when construction is completed. Mn /DOT nR161NAL se oorlNG & A PARCEL OWNER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MIN EASEMEA FROM TO ANCE LASEM AZIMUTH RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 27 -196 Q u y BZ 819619 BI96x] 19.01 2)0.51.09' BI96x] ez s[.x1 4•s1•"9- CONTROL SECTION N0. 2772(169=S)903 I B24 Bxz [9T.ac 9 6.4]']1• IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.116 N., R.21 9•I., IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.116 N., R.21 17., HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 309A - - -' -- __•I9A. _, 1314021 702 819924 1 r.o m sm[[r •T- E -E•_P 201 ?.E. PM. 204A lyy T.E. AR. 2048 P 19", a9 CM. T TO elrl T x5[9.11' I• WASHINGTON 9 7 A IMMUNE W1 /2 SWI /9 �F TRACT E TIYCT 0 TRACT C TMCT B aIILTCT TTRACT E D IA ti� R R. L. S. a N0. 1283 R.L.S. N0. 1253 ` I . Y =�' •9• u,veur s �'' •NM,w9 fuiim CITY I[........ YOSOin[°X1R0LW rt•E• Pw.]m 819600 P[c.[u[.9elmm uw°I[9mTT9nu•� 104 y r FTE°GNMIILAE GALL [� ...... 1TI- r RC PARCEL 309A (] P� 20 ' !' mT.E. Pi[R. 204A —. =° EL 204A jGH�pY 0 '¢01962] PARL H F m 019619 p,,9i• _ mPARCEL 204 '_ - • fl/{1 s uuT. i.e. Iu nry y 819009 TRACT 0 To It.. AND "ALL c p MAINTENANCE PARCEL 208 EASEMENT PAR. 2D4A T.E. PAR. 209 ,° f �g e- '(PUNK __BMW v _-T.E.SPAR.20 EDINA r 2: I P THE TIM OF TRUNK HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION IS xTHEBY UTH LINE OF THE DEFINITE d - LOCATION Di TRUNK NIGN9AY N0. 169 FROM THE SOUTH LINE K SECTION T TO [sxsY :� °�• � L � 81961 - a inm "e s°i" miEE a0' L 9 og p^ RIGHT OF DAY IN REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1283 PARCEL OWNER LOCATION 309A BASS LAKE PROPERTIES, LLC. TRACT B D C 1314021 702 - RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 7 W1 /2 SWI /9 i • FOR REMAINDER OF PARCEL 204 SEE PLAT 27 -199 i NOT" TEMPORARY COMISSIONER'S ORDERS IN PUBLIC ROADS VILL EWIRE ON 12- 014015 0.5 MILES NORTH IN THE CITY OF EOINA . - ®� { °° 9, rm 9t.r� u; �;i n}.°meei : [:°rargmlwr' v ,rrm m trees : -F• °ru m ,. . rt�t:rM T-E rit° ° °.marwM e:q m n...r 111 1m°^ � --1 e�iAM E: nnm rn e.ml..i.rm•. 6•xer m. •wlrm 91254 PLAT 27 -196 ' :4xm•w � S �20! o or 1°� .e nwa oin:s - ur.° 91.o-rm A�n/�'i'���°`M���'°ro� a��tt "��° ��o ° � 5M ��" ?:a �P� °� �,• [v1lYltl Ay 14• -AlAC.� -`rm 251157 5 A- � NtiW R I urnn." 6y rr 40345 �NO E. CONVENTIONAL STMOOLS aiem,M pm _ ,'s ai.o— SURVEY STANDARDS DOG. NO. 4-750/6713 Mv un. • [mr u.. w.wN , i,. i r ..n... mr.nr...r .r.[.e... s..a m ro. ro..rs wwx. •aa+a. ulumr mlonr,ns w am cur.nzxm 9.•r4.v xnr . sra ro. v cm o1einmrm onf.. e: le:i'no •r+,m1° C0O1� OFFICE 0 REGISTRAR OF TITLES "I'" -T. An Lw o l' 91,•0mTYm� �m $— x. n. w •x..mY. n.,x, m mr. •in mw b•m Yr.ia mmu4 w Ivmrim. Tn. n.m.a , 9uYx•. n.r •rnwm Yr. a[.M Imema HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA u�R.ID ^rte t gEgy AE TI y N7 T Hpi nrmr• wammr _ p s. m.r n m.an.rP..�me.. n�rw 1 r .n�l.. [• rwrr.wr °.nr.r m..mr.. FA E EE_ f� N_ FILEDF IN20,Lo5AT�.L JAT6M r.r. _ _ nn awrmy 1. rr .mN. w rni. W.•a mmmr w swo ro s m rro wm.mr° ".°��T .r ONS.NJAL4�� N W lydrne 0mmae�l [mmPr � J.B•6� � T. TwuprT °rrm. I'm IIEST�OLOEN VALLEY mr IN CAB. 0._ "mNw ar9u T9 F[n IN. w [m.I Mrc Duer vuuu. °°' ° ° ° PLAT N0. 27 -196 C.S. 27721169c51903 IT REGISTRAR OF TITLES CITY, OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 10!7/2010 - 10!1/2010 - Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339754 10_/7/2010 101833 A.T.O.M. 75.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 246956 27691255 1400.6104. CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 339765 101712010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY - 26.00 246810 0807644 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 59.65 246811 0807650 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 34:80 246852, 0724610 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING _ 88.05 246853 0807647 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 94.10 246854 0807594 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS, SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 302.60 - 339756 101712010 117003 ACKER, NANCY 100.00 THREE ROOMS AWARD 2010: 247031 093010 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 339767 1017/2010 122065 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. 6,984.00 CHEVRON APPLICATIONS 246912 182182 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,984.00 = 339758 101712010 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 49.00 246957 093010 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 107.88 246957 093010 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 112.26 246957 093010 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 137.16 246957 093010 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149,95 246957 093010 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 331.82 246957 093010 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 348.14 246957 093010 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 1,236.21 339759 101712010 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 14.00 U NiFORK PURCHASE 234379 041410 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 14.00 339760 10!712010 111440 ANTIGUA GROUP INC., THE 74.61 MERCHANDISE., 246913 3382928 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.61 339761 10!712010 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 500.61 FOOD 246914 1430269 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 500.61 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 2 10!7/2010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339762 1017/2010 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 232.59 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246592 37946 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 232.59 339763 10/7/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 133.76 COFFEE 246915 417580 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 91.51 COFFEE 246916 417500 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 225.27 339764 10/712010 - 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 111.00 SMOKE ALARM SERVICE 00001655 246792 147316 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 111.00 339765 10f712010 125307 BARNABAS HOUSE, THE 15.00 REFUND (SUPER SUNDAY) 231752 030410 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 339766 10/7/2010 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 901.00 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 246593 232701-106.00 -19 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 16,456.00 LS #2 IMPROVEMENTS 246685 23271114.00 -3 10041.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 17,357.00 339767 10/712010 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 32.09 BATTERIES 00001553 246686 018 - 210321 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 32.09 339768 10!712010 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 191.86 BATTERIES 00005245 246687 C13688 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 327.12 BATTERIES 00005245 246793 C13859 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 518.98 339769 10/7/2010 126300 BAUMAN, DOUG 87.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246837 093010 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 87.75 339770 101712010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,919.93 246812 54980100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 248.11 246813 84231100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 133.55 246840 54979900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 627.45 246855 54992100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120.10 246856 54979800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 173.10 246857 54868100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/7/2010 - 10!1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /. Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 124.23 246858 84231300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 415.28 246859 5988000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 66.09 246860 84200900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 135.08 246861 5991200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 26.00 246862 84200800 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 3,988.92 339771 101712010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 15.00 REIMBURSEMENT 246917 092910 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 56.07 REIMBURSEMENT 246917 092910 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 71.07 339772 10/712010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 78.01 . OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009250 246958 OE- 235166 -1 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 34.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009261 246959 OE- 236236 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 77,72- 246960 CP -OE- 234730 -1 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 77.72 246961 OE- 234730 -1 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 112.69 339773 10/712010 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 94.34 TOILET SERVICE 00001656 246794 23141 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 94.34 339774 10/712010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 42.83 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001437 246690 62928 1322.6406, GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 85.67 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001437 246690 62928 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.68 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001437 246690 62928 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 85.68 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001437 246690 62928 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 85.68 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001437 246690 62928 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 133.79 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001437 246690 62928 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 9.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 246962 63043 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 246962 63043 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 65.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 246962 63043 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 616.05 339775 10/7/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 53.74 FILTERS 00005168 246691 445752 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.53 GASKET 00005203 246963 446691 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.27 339776 1017/2010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 719.25 MATERIALS TESTING 246594 324608 01379.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA- 379 44TH ST;' 'IDEBTHIELEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Cheek Register 10!7/2010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,370.00 MATERIALS TESTING 246595 325021 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 200.00 MATERIALS TESTING 246596 324950 01375.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 692.25 MATERIALS TESTING 246596 324950. 01359.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 725.75 MATERIALS TESTING 246597 324951 04362.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 628.25 MATERIALS TESTING 246598 324966 5600.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 4 Business Unit BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD STS -362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 4,335.50 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 339777 101712010 EDINBOROUGH PARK 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1628.6575 PRINTING 360.00 FIRE DEPT PHOTOS 247106 1036 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 60.00 COMMUNICATIONS DEPT PHOTOS 247107 1035 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 420.00 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 339778 1017/2010 STREET RENOVATION- 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 521.64 DOOR REPAIR 246964 5141245 521.64 339779 101712010 116164 BRINDLE, DOROTHY 26.47 GARDEN SUPPLIES FOR SR CTR 246788 092410• 26.47 339780 1017/2010 119826 . BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 804.71 OCT NEWSLETTER 00008249 246918 22881 804.71 339781 1017/2010 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 10/14/10 246965 100110 150.00 339782 1017/2010 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 11,440.68 ASPHALT 00001210 246692 8424MB 6,643.08 ASPHALT 00001210 246693 8433MB 9,498.73 ASPHALT 00001210 246694 8453MB 595.74 ASPHALT 00001210 246695 8467MB 6,719.45 ASPHALT 00001210 246696 8460MB 34,897.68 339783 10/712010 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 62.80 246841 12721 62.80 339784 101712010 116683 CATw& FIDDLE BEVERAGE 85.33 246842 87702 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 4 Business Unit BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS BA -375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD STS -362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1314.6518 - BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION- 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 10(7/2010 - 10!7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 85.33 339785 10/712010 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY _ 1,757.83 5591458 246599 5591458 -9/10 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 530.79 5546504 -1 246600 5546504 -9/10 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,288.62 339786 10/712010 116353 -CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 252.49 ENVELOPES 246601 28149 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 252.49 339787 1017/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 94.00 247046 428307 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING` 94.00 339788 101712010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 3,801.90 00077479 - 0113317143 246966 113317143 -9110 5620.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,801.90 339789 101712010 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 143.20 SEAT BELT 00005158 246697 135125 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 143.20 339790 107712010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 383.50 246843 0148086228 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 414.10 246863 0178161815 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 797.60 339791 10/712010 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. - 203.87 ASPHALT 00001222 246698 091510 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 203.87 339792 10/712010 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC: 174.76` POLY; REBAR 00001699 246602 0054446 -IN 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 174.76 ;. 339793 101712010 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 73.74 ASSEMBLY FOR FOOTPEDAL- 00009252 246967 R200365315 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 502.58 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009255 246968 INV000054991 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION, 863.21 STONEWARE 00009245 246969 INV000054546 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 13.31 KEMPER TOOLS 246970 8200365622 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 1,452.84 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017/2010 — 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339794 10/712010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 3,119.15 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008032 246603 71987 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,119.15 339795 1017/2010 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page- 6 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT 72.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 228853 011510 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.00 339796 10/7/2010 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING 00006393 246971 168267 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.00 339797 1017/2010 127309 CROUCH, BONNIE 50.00 MERIT AWARD 2010 247032 093010 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50.00 339798 10/7/2010 106428 CUSTOM DOOR SALES INC. 115.00 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIR 246919 0045598 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 115.00 339799 1017/2010 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 3,922.67 SCADA PARTS LABOR 00001725 246699 9942 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5,322.80 MODIFY /UPGRADE SCADA 00001726 246700 9941 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 9,245.47 339800 10/712010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 44.80 246844 570846 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,618.60 247047 570845 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.90 247048 570842 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,322.90 247049 570841 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,030.20 339801 10/712010 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 65.99 622833 WATER 246972 7088545 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 65.99 339802 101712010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 20.68 TORQ STICK 00005109 246973 518045 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 408.67 HOSE REEL, GRINDERS 00005165 246974 518817 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 429.35 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page= 7 Business Unit GRILL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH 68.00 LEGAL 246701' 1675542 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL R55CKREG LOG20000 68.00 339808 1017/2010 Council Check Register 10/7/2010 - 10f7/2010 CHEMICALS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339803 10!712010 100720 DEN NYS.6TH AVE., BAKERY 339809 1017/2010.- 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 47.86 BAKERY 246920 345487 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2.54- ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 47.86 07479300 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 339804 1017/2010 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 101349 _ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 07479300 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 420.00 FIREARM SAFETY CLASSES 246921 093010 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 420.00 188.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001672 246604 339805 1017/2010 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 178.60 WIRE, CODING TAPE, FUSES 00001686 246605 07490700 96.80 REPAIR PARTS 246975 650243624 -10/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER WIRE, CODING TAPE, FUSES 00001686 246605 96.80 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 339806 1017/2010 00001748 246606 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 814.75 3,501.99 REFUSE 247102 1153396 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 3,495.57 REFUSE 247103 1153397 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,997.56 FIRE STATE AID 246976 100110 1400.4218 339807 10/712010 .100730 DORSEY 8. WHITNEY. LLP 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page= 7 Business Unit GRILL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH 68.00 LEGAL 246701' 1675542 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 68.00 339808 1017/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 5,568.98 CHEMICALS 00001215 246702 82701557 -10 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5,568.98 339809 1017/2010.- 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 2.54- ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001672 246604 07479300 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001672 246604 07479300 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 158.82 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES � 00001672 246604 07479300 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 188.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001672 246604 07479300 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 178.60 WIRE, CODING TAPE, FUSES 00001686 246605 07490700 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 234.71 WIRE, CODING TAPE, FUSES 00001686 246605 07490700 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 32.02 SCREWDRIVER, CONNECTORS 00001748 246606 07519500 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 814.75 339810 101712010 101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASS 276,092.00 FIRE STATE AID 246976 100110 1400.4218 POLICE AID 1% POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 276,092.00 339811 1017/2010 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 80.76 BROOM, TAPE, WASHERS, NAILS 00009259 246977 83736 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 80.76 RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/612010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 8 10/7/2010 - 10!7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339812 1017/2010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR_ 394.80'` ARTS IN PARK BEER & WINE . 246838 [100] 5840.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 394.80 339813 10f712010 100649 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 1.263.46, TRANSDUCER & CABLE 00001704 246607 0042135 IN 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,263.46 339814 10x7/2010 101956 - EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC . 1,064.34 T -90 REPAIRS. 246922 51473 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,064.34 339816 10f712010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 265.87 RADIATOR 00005121 246703 1- 3460754 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.95 RESISTOR ASSEMBLY 00005121-246704 69- 020641 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.03- CREDIT 246978 1- 3464879 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 265.79 339816 101712010 106036 FASTENAL COMPANY 412.89 HARDWARE FOR -RINKS 00001598 246608 MNTC2102794 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 412.89 i 339817 10f712010 102846 FCC.LCC.. - a 53.41 ACOP CABLE 246979 16122 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.41 339818 10f712010 126004 FERGUSON.WATERWORKS . 102.39 CURB STOPS & REPAIR PARTS 00001718 246609 S01274102.002 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 102.39 339819 101712010 106420 - FIKES'SERVICES j 41.25 AIR DEODORIZERS 246839 3379 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 41.25 339820 1017/2010 120329 FIRE:EQUIPMENTlSPECIALTIES.INC '' 1,811.01 BLOWER - PPV • . 00003798'- 246923 6749 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT: GENERAL 339821 10f712010 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 100.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 2010 247033 093010 5110:6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 10!712010 — 1017/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339822 101712010 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 1,097.18 TV TRUCK COMPUTER REPAIR 00001723 246610 13680 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,097.18 339823 10/712010 100769 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 234.73 LOCKS, KEYS 00001685 246705 213956 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 234.73 339824 1017/2010 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 87.72 K9 BOOSTER SHOTS 246611 369594 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 87.72 339825 1017/2010 125304 FRASER LOUISE HOUSE 60.00 REFUND (SUPER SUNDAY) 231763 030110 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 60.00 339826 1017/2010 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 270.84 TOOL RACKS 00001637 246612 1016120123 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 270.84 339827 10!712010 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL CO. INC. 15,950.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 246706 100810 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 15,950.12 339828 1017/2010 111343 GLANZER, ROGER 646.24 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247028 100110 5919.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING 646.24 339829 1017/2010 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 491.90 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247025 093010 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 491.90 339830 101712010 101178 GOPHER 334.72 SCOOTERS 246980 8189378 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 334.72 339831 10/7/2010 101103 GRAINGER 65.41 HYDRANT PAINT 00001717 246613 9352666839 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 91.57 HYDRANT PAINT 00001717 246614 9352666821 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 64.09 MEASURING TAPES 00005152 246707 9348958951 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 327.12 SERVICE CART, DOLLYS, GLOVES 00001719 246708 9355040776 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 10 10!7/2010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.17 EAR PLUGS 00001693 246709 9349040106 '1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 586.81 WATER HOSE, GLOVES, WIPE ROLL0001693 246710 9348149858 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 486.17 GLOVES, EAR PLUGS, BIT SET 00001693 246711 9348149841 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,115.78 SHELVING FOR NEW BLDG 00001645 246824 9354931348 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,807.12 339832 10!7/2010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 633.50 246814 122463 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 911.25 246864 122519 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 322.75 247050 122686 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,867.50 339833 10/7/2010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 54.99 TRASH BAGS 246924 092810 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 35.37 ART FAIR CUPS 246925 092710 5840.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 195.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246926 093010 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 285.36 339834 101712010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 20.84 PHONE CORDS 00001746 246795 949952983 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 74.93 CONDUIT, PHONE JACKS 00001741 246796 949928632 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 94.95 CONDUIT, PHONE JACKS 00001741 246796 949928632 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 18.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001746 246851 949952984 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 209.32 339835 1017/2010 101409 GREAT AMERICAN MARINE 761.40 BOAT REPAIR 246927 92310 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 761.40 339836 101712010 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 681.44 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246615 102996 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 815.80 246616 103037 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 692.66 246617 103036 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 800.96 246618 102993 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 967.19 246619 102995 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 733.91 246620 102994 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 4,691.96 339837 1017/2010 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 10,980.00 4TH QTR RETAINER 246928 093010 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10,980.00 CITY OF EDINA 10/612010 .8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 1017/2010 — 10(7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339838 1017/2010 100788 H &L MESABI 2,387.16 CUTTING EDGES 00005999 246712 80888 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,387.16 339839 1017/2010 103684 HANCO CORPORATION 84.97 INFLATOR GAUGE 00005115 246713 539323 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.97 -339840 1017/2010 127310 HEEREN, RACHEL 100.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 2010 247034 093010 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 339841 10!712010 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 32.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 246825 21088114 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 32.00 339842 101712010 100802 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,530.00 EMT COURSES 246929 22894 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,530.00 339843 1017/2010 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 4,075.66 ROOM & BOARD -AUG 2010 246621 20108 - EDINA 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 4,075.66 339844 101712010 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 943.73 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 246714 092910 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 23,664.42 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 246714 092910 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 24,608.15 339845 101712010 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 247051 QB15098 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 339846 101712010 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 3,992.99 OFFICE MOVE- REMODEL 246715 457452 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 17,083.20 OFFICE FURNITURE 00004205 246809 457453 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 3,087.58 CARPET REPAIR 246930 457454 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 24,163.77 339847 1017/2010 127282 HEUN ENTERPRISES INC. 247052 1937 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 369.00 369.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/7/2010 — 1017/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339848 1017/2010 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 633.56 FIELD PAINT 00005183 246622 88585 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 633.56 339849 1017/2010 164376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page- 12 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE. 1,112.25 247053 535994 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 339851, 247054 535957 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS- SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,087.50 247055 535956 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,255.75 1550.6200 INSURANCE 58,233.00 PREMIUM 339860 10/7/2010 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1550.6200 INSURANCE 117,534.00, 8.52 PW SUPPLIES 246716 091310 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.64 PW SUPPLIES 246716 091310 01359.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 240.78 PW SUPPLIES 246716 091310 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 284.64. .PW SUPPLIES 246716 091310 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,015.98 PW SUPPLIES 246716 091310 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC PROGRAMS ASSESSING GENERAL TURF CARE 2,563.56 339851, 10/7/2010 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 2,384.00 PREMIUM 246981 84682 1550.6200 INSURANCE 58,233.00 PREMIUM 246.982 84689 1550.6200 INSURANCE 117,534.00, PREMIUM 246983: 84679 ' . 1550.6200 INSURANCE 23,906.00 PREMIUM 246984 -84681 1550.6200 INSURANCE 262,057.00 339852 1017/2010 127311 HUNTLEY, BONNIE 100.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 247035 093010 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 339853 10/7/2010 127308 HYATT, CHARLES 65.00 PISTOL LEAGUE REFUND 24693.1 093010 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 65.00 339864 1017/2010 100812 IAAO 61.66 PROP ASSESS VALUATION TEXT 246932 093010 1190.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES " 61.66 339866 1017/2010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 63.87 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001642 246623 624012 -'.t .1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC PROGRAMS ASSESSING GENERAL TURF CARE 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page- 13 Business Unit BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS RESERVE PROGRAM ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS 204.00 246866 1421523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 168.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 1421440 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,997.45 247056 1433224 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING Council Check Register . 247057 1433264 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,713.25 1 on/201 o -1 017/2010 1433263 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339856 101712010 3,915.77 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 1433261 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 14,128.77 203.60 DOG FENCE REPAIR 246624 134139 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 339861 1017/2010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 203.00 34.65 339857 101712010 1643.6406 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F GENERAL TURF CARE c 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 246797 100110 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 373.10 246815 1914758 5842.5513 339858 1017/2010 1,070.67 106114 - JENSEN, DAVID 1913583 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.83- 243.75 ART WORK SOLD 247036 092310 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 6.66 - 246818 243.75 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 40.02- 339869 101712010 5842.5513 102146 JESSEN PRESS YORK SELLING 17.01- 246820 472043 5842.5513 44.89 POSTER PRINTING 246798 24252 2210.6575 PRINTING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 44.89 7,33- 246822 472040 5842.5513 339860 101712010 13.04- 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 471037 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page- 13 Business Unit BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS RESERVE PROGRAM ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS 204.00 246866 1421523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 168.00 246866 1421440 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,997.45 247056 1433224 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 62.80 247057 1433264 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,713.25 247058 1433263 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 67.50 247059 1421533 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,915.77 247060 1433261 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 14,128.77 339861 1017/2010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 34.65 SPRAYER 00001627 246625 55871763 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 34.65 339863 101712010 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 373.10 246815 1914758 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,070.67 246816 1913583 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.83- 246817 472190 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.66 - 246818 472039 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 40.02- 246819 472041 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17.01- 246820 472043 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.68- 246821 472042 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,33- 246822 472040 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.04- 246845 471037 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 75.52- 246846 472561 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.36 246867 1884433 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLIN' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 339864 1017/2010 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 280.26 121.12 62.84 746.20 763.10- 10.40. 20.80 - 7.63- 36.12- 77.62- 51.84- 102.66- 3,629.87 1,577.01 22.11 2,228.31 2,865.50 1.12 1,015.31 1,029.86 31.37 2,926.80 1,841.67 2.24 2,689.68 21,279.14 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 427.50 VACUUM 00003808 246933 092810 427.50 339865 101712010 121481 KAPLAN PROFESSIONAL.SCHOOLS 219:00 COURSE REGISTRATION 246985 100110 219.00 339666 10/712010 '104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 191.29 UNIFORM PURCHASE 247040 100410 191.29 339867 10/7/2010 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 59.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247105 100410 59.20 1470.6406 1400.6104 1400.6203 1600.6107 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING . YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017/2010 - 1017/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 246868 1917883 5862.5512 246869 1917880 5862.5512 246870 1914576 5862.5513 246871 1914760 5862.5513 246872 472563 5862.5512 246873 471276 5862.5513 246874 471275 5862.5513 246875 471274 5862.5513 246876 470559 5862.5513 246877 472044 5862.5513 246878 472562 5862.5513 246879 471800 5862.5513 247061 1917874 5842.5513 247062 1917872 5842.5513 247063 191787.1 5842.5513 247064 1917870 5842.5513 247065 1917879 5842.5512 247066 1917867 5842.5512 247067 1913588 5842.5512 247068 1917869 5842.5512 247069 1917878 5842.5515 247070 1917877 5842.5512 247071 1917876 5842.5512 247072 1917875 5842.5515 247073 1917873 5842.5512 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 427.50 VACUUM 00003808 246933 092810 427.50 339865 101712010 121481 KAPLAN PROFESSIONAL.SCHOOLS 219:00 COURSE REGISTRATION 246985 100110 219.00 339666 10/712010 '104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 191.29 UNIFORM PURCHASE 247040 100410 191.29 339867 10/7/2010 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 59.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247105 100410 59.20 1470.6406 1400.6104 1400.6203 1600.6107 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING . YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 4. CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS - STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10!7/2010 — 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 339868 1017/2010 105887 .KOESSLER,,JOE 168.00 SEPT SERVICE., 246934 093010 1628.6103 168.00 339869 101712010 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 632.35 PROLASER III SERVICE 246626 425814 1400.6215 632.35 339870 101712010 126428 LAKEVIEW,DOORS 320.00 REPLACE WINDOW AT ART CENTEI00009214: 241235 21527 5111.6180 320:00 339871 101712010 100605 .LANDS', END, BUSINESS OUTFITTERS. 695.40 UNIFORM SHIRTS 246935 08977917 5862.6406 695.40 339872 101712010 102661 LAWN RANGER, THE 661.25 SPRINKLER'REPAIR- 246627 54249 01362.1705.20 661.25 339873 1017120.10. 100852' LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 227.47 WASHERS, TY -RAP 00005153 246717 9608003 1553.6530 404.52 ANCHOR ASST 00001766 246799 9592584 1322.6530 76.68 .'MASONRY ANCHORS 00001766 246800 9592586 1330.6406 418.12 REGENCY DRILL, FALCON GRIPS 00601766 246801 9592585 1322.6406 1,126.79 339874 10/712010 127306 LEADBETTER, HARRY 65.00 PISTOL LEAGUE REFUND 246936 093010 7414.4390 65.00 339876 101712010 123267 LICARI, JEANNE 50.00 MERIT AWARD 2010 247038 093010 5110.6103 50.00 339876 1017/2010 `123573 LOGIN / IACP NET 1,100.00• ' ANNUAL DUES 246826 14945 1400.6105 1,100.00 339877 1017/2010 137303 MACNEILL, MARG 54.00 TRIP REFUND 246789 092410 1628.4392.07 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 4. CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS - STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SENIOR TRIPS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 16 10n/2010 - 10!7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 54.00 339878 10/7/2010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 61.05 COIL 00005198 246718 2105518 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 61.05 EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 339879 101712010 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 20.00 REIMBURSEMENT 247041 093010 1550.6121 39.77 REIMBURSEMENT 247041 093010 2210.6406 44.00 REIMBURSEMENT 247041 093010 2210.6107 103.77 339880 10/7/2010 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 425.00 HOSTING FEE 246802 149 2210.6103 425.00 339881 101712010 101146 MATRIX 239.75 246628 607660482 1550.6188 239.75 339882 101712010 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 721.41 PLANTS 00002167 246986 49541 5620.6620 721.41 339883 1017/2010 103720 MEDTECH 2,049.60 WRISTBANDS 00002169 246987 IN000326869 5621.6406 2,049.60 339884 10/712010 103232 MEHA 30.00 MEMBERSHIP - JEFF BROWN 247100 093010 1490.6105 30.00 339885 101712010 101987 MENARDS 38.71 BOLTS 246988 22840 5620.6406 38.71 339886 10/712010 102281 MENARDS 36.94 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00001244 246629 94776 1646.6406 90.77 PAINT 00001644 246630 95902 1646.6406 127.71 339887 1017/2010 104156 MENARDS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/712010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 155.52 BLEACH, LIGHT BULBS 00002393 246989 74974 5630.6406- GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 17 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES 155.52 339888 10/712010 100886 METRO SALES INC 347.34 COPIER RENTAL 246631 26410A 1180.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTION 347.34 339889 101712010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. - 404.59 ASPHALT 00001224 246719 107434MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 404.59 339890 10/7/2010 127306 MIKA, LYNNAE 375.00 RENTAL REFUND FOR 8/1312011 246836 093010 5601.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EB /CL REVENUES 375.00 339891 101712010 122473 MILLER, CHICHI 50.00 MERIT AWARD 2010 247037 093010 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50.00 339892 10/712010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS '& SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,960.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001722 246632 33702 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,715.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001727 246720 .33707 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,675.00 339893 10/7/2010 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 404.08 COUPLING SLEEVES 00001765 246990 0259790 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 404.08 339894 1017/2010 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 50.00 WEB ADVERTISING 246633 117196 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 50.00 339896 10/7/2010 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 686.67 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001213 246721 61887 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,346.20 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001213 246722 61886 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 2,032.87 339896 101712010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 222.68 SPRAYER PARTS 00001616 246634 0086300 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 109.01 SHIMS 00005144 246723 0086297 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.82 SPRAYER PARTS 00001649 246827 0086387 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 32.06 GUARD RAIL PIPE 00001742 246991 0086295 -IN 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10!7/2010 —10/7/2010. Check # Date Amount Supplier. / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 475.17 GUARD RAIL 00001554 246992 0086298 -IN 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL 1470.6530 5511.6136 REPAIR PARTS 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 18 Business Unit BRIDGES GUARD RAILS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 886.74 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5630.6540 ' FERTILIZER 339897 1017/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100898 MINVALCO 178.57. BOILER VALVE 00001750 246937 766769 178.57 339898 101712010 127302 MOE, DAN 82.00 FALL CLASS REFUND - 246790 092710 82.00 339899 1017/2010 127304 MONTROSE, TOM 1,200.00 TREE REMOVAL 00001643 246828 202083 1,200.00 339900 1017/2010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 53.83 MOTOR 00005205 246993 484691F6W. 53.83 339901 - 10f7/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 2,065.04 FUNGICIDE " 00002392 246994 760710 -00 2,065.04 339902 10!7/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 354.00 246880 61947 354.00 339903 10/7/2010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,170.28 ' POSTS 00001690 246995 TI- 0226830 1,170.28 339904 1017/2010 122989 NISCAYAH INC. 270.00', ALARM SYSTEM REPAIR 00002394 246996 SV0144066 270.00 - 339906 1017/2010 115616 NORTH:IMAGE APPAREL INC. 24.50 FLEECE LINED PANTS 00005413 246724 NIA4355C 24.50 FLEECE LINED PANTS 00005413 246724 NIA4355C 73.50 FLEECE LINED PANTS 00005413 246724 NIA4355C 122.50 339906 1017/2010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 1470.6530 5511.6136 REPAIR PARTS 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 18 Business Unit BRIDGES GUARD RAILS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5630.6540 ' FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1325.6531 5630.6180 1301:6201 1553.6201 1646.6201 SIGNS & POSTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET NAME SIGNS CENTENNIAL LAKES LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 10!7/2010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,505.23 LIGHTS, MOUNT KITS 00005164 246725 25254 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,505.23 339907 1017/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 539.07 PAINT 00009256 246997 39498100 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 14.33 PENS 00009224 246998 39058202 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 553.40 339908 101712010 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 43.78 NAME BADGES - 00008016 246635 533041573001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 52.91 DVDS 246999 1160652952 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 59.74 PAPER, NOTE PADS, PENS 00002181 247000 534386451001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 19.72 MONTHLY PLANNER 00002181 247001 534386699001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 92.78 TONER 00002181 247002 534387460001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 170.00 TONER 247003 533827087001 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 438.93 339909 1017/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 60.01 RULER, CLEANING TOWELS 00001745 246636 609807 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 49.35 CUTOFF WHEELS 00008027 246637 609492 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 260.26 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 00008022 246638 609289 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 369.62 339910 101712010 121410 OLSON, JEAN 54.00 TRIP REFUND 246938 093010 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 54.00 339911 1017/2010 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 180.00 BOLLARD REPAIR 247004 2101 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 800.00 BOLLARD REPAIR 247005 2103 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 4,792.00 CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 247042 2095 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 5,772.00 339912 101712010 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 12,507.61 FALL CLASS % 246639 092810 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,820.00 247029 100110 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 14,327.61 339913 1017/2010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 68.91 COOKIES 246939 80188849 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.91 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 20 10/7/2010 - 10!7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339914 10/712010 102440 PASS, GRACE 100.00 MERIT AWARD 2010 247039 093010 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 339915 10 1712010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 346.65 246881 8276576 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 713.50 246882 8276578 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105.25 246883 8276588 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 61.20- 246884 8275864 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,424.85 247074 8276563 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,883.76 247075 8276575 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,412.81 339916 10 17/2010 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 4,875.00 RINK GRADING - PAMELA PK 00001651 246640 84 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 4,875.00 339917 1017/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 180.84 246885 2966776 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 513.87 246886 2969239 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10.00- 246887 3444701 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 53.47- 246888 3444002 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 121.12- 246889 3444389 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 705.16 247076 2969236 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,215.28 339918 10 /712010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 294.80 246847 11020 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 294.80 339919 10 /7/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 788.72 TIRES 00005015 246726 771706 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 131.91 TIRES 00005120 246727 623981 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 920.63 339920 101712010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING 247043 100410 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 339921 10 /712010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,268.82 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE, LINERS 00002161 247006 4929 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,268.82 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 1 Of712010 - 10!1/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339922 10/7/2010 103094 - PROTECTION ONE . 169.15 ALARM MONITORING SERVICE 00008033 246641 12743654 -9/10 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 169.15 339923 101712010: 114115 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 630.00 CERTIFICATION OF LASERS 246642 2725 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 630.00 339924 1017/2010 104455 PUPPE, RICHARD 109.85 UNIFORM PURCHASE 247026 100410 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 109.85 339925 101712010 . 100971 QUALITY WINE 1246848 .806.74 361863 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,997.33 246890 361998 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,066.40 246891 362155 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,538.51 246892 361864 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 192.00 246893 360242 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 826.00 246894 361858 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 452.13 246895 362164 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.33- 246896 359306 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.33- 246897 359288 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 185.60- 246898 359287 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,908.33 247077 361997 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,756.09 247078 362153 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 643.80 247079 362154 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20,975.07 339926 10!712010 123898 QWEST 58.06 952 922 -2444 - 246643 2444 -9/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 114.05 9529 . 2M166 246644 8166 -9/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.15 952 922 -9246 246829 9246 -9/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.71 952 929 -0297 247021 0297 - 9110" 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 351.43 952 927 -8861 247022 8861 -9/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 619.40 339927 1017/2010 126326 REACH LOCAL INC. 290.00 84358 WEB ADVERTISING 246645 CID- 620903 5822:6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 290.00 84358 WEB ADVERTISING 246645 CID - 620903 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 290.00 84358 WEB ADVERTISING 246645 CID- 620903 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 870.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. . 68.96 FILTERS 00003812 246941 115168 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 68.96 - Council Check Register 103016 SCHEERER, JOHN 118.50. ,UNIFORM.PURCHASE 247027 100410 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 118 :50 10!7/2010 -1 Of712010 2,687.66 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description 339928 10f712010 126343 RICHFIELD DO GRILL AND CHILL 102:79 DILLY BARS, CAKE 247007 526 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 102.79 339929 10/712010 123767 RIECHMANN PEDERSON'DESIGN INC 75.00 MAP UPDATE 247044 910151 -4 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75.00 339930 101712010 101940 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE" 55.00 FIRE SCHOOL 246940 002006SFS -2 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS _. 55.00 339931 101712010 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 2,090.64 SCREED PLATE, SHIMS 00005114 246728 C56455 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 45.79 MATS 00005166 246729 C56525 . 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 345.87 RUBBER MOUNTS 00005199 246730 C56516 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,482.30 339932 10/7/2010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 865.12 WASTE.RECYCLING 00001212.246731 52010165 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 865.12 339933 10/712010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT. 186.23 TABLES 247008 003021 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139.32 SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 00001209 247009 004362 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 325.55 339934 10/7/2010_ 127301. SANDVEN, TERRY 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 22 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING 176.00 FALL CALSS REFUND 246791 092710 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 176.00 339935 10f712010 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. . 68.96 FILTERS 00003812 246941 115168 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 68.96 - 339936 101712010 103016 SCHEERER, JOHN 118.50. ,UNIFORM.PURCHASE 247027 100410 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 118 :50 339937 101712010 100996 ISEH 2,687.66 70TH ST LANDSCAPE 246646 235217; 01241:1705.20 CONSULTING•DESIGN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 23 10/7/2010 — 101712010 Check # Date Amount 3,760.56 108.46 250.31 308.71 1,001.21 30,119.66 326.68 435.58 980.03 1,524.51 2,450.10 2,450.10 2,722.35 781.39 1 ,717.57 6,369.05 14,330.36 17,577.46 4,134.42 94,036.17 Supplier / Explanation PO # MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBOR ST JOHNS PARK RECON L" ST JOHNS PARK RECON ST.JOHNS PARK RECON ST JOHNS PARK RECON STORM /SIGN INVENTORY COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR COUNTRY CLUB CONSTR PAMELA PK NEIGHBORHOOD PAMELA PK NEIGHBORHOOD PAMELA PK NEIGHBORHOOD PAMELA PK NEIGHBORHOOD RIDGE ROAD RECONSTR CLEARWIRE - LEASE ANTENNA Doc No Inv No 246647 235585 246648 235576 246648 235576 246648 235576 246648 235576 246732 235241 246733 235575 246733 235575 246733 235575 246733 235575 246733 235575 246733 235575 246733 235575 246734 235577 246734 235577 246734 235577 246734 235577 246735 235584 246803 235932 339938 10/7/2010 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 566.12 SAW CASTORS 00001214 247010 149063 566.12 339939 1017/2010 126096 SIERRA METALS INC. 2,390.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 246736 100810 2,390.20 339940 10f712010 339941 101712010 339942 10/712010 339943 1' . '0 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 42.70 BAR CODE LABELS 247011 56781 42.70 101000 SIR SPEEDY 46.44 BUSINESS CARDS 246942 66299 46.44 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 290.00 SWAT SUPERVISION CLASS 246830 8462 290.00 104672 SPRINT Account No 01334.1705.20 04352.1705.24 05487.1705.24 03445.1705.24 01357.1705.24 5932.6103 08043.1705.21 08049.1705.21 04297.1705.21 03413.1705.21 01214.1705.21 01213.1705.21 05436.1705.21 03449.1705.21 05492.1705.21 04358.1705.21 01360.1705.21 01384.1705.21 1001.4722 1301.6610 4402.1705.30 5620.6406 1550.6406 1400.6104 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION. CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION RENTAL OF PROPERTY SAFETY EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS Business Unit BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON STS -352 FAIRFAX N'HOOD WM -487 FAIRFAX N'HOOD SS-445 FAIRFAX N'HOOD BA -357 FAIRFAX N'HOOD GENERAL STORM SEWER 1-43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM SS-449 PAMELA PARK WM-492 PAMELA PARK STS -358 PAMELA PARK BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION GENERAL FUND REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE PW BUILDING EDINBQROUGH PARK CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1011/2010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 158.63 DATA CARDS 00001213 246804 666109817 -034 5911.6188 TELEPHONE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 24 Business Unit WELL PUMPS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 158.63 REPAIR PARTS' EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE ADVERTISING LEGAL 339944 101712010 ADVERTISING LEGAL 101004 SPS COMPANIES 9.49 THERMOCOUPLE KIT 00001641 246649 S2262790.001 1643.6530 14.25 PLUMBING SEALANT 00001652 246650 S2261433.001 1643.6530 '29.56 BALL VALVES; RINGS 00005050 246737 S2261407.001 1553.6530 ,246.10 PIPE, CAP 00001720 247012 S2264803.001 5921.6406 299.40 339945 10/712010 102261 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 373.02 MERCHANDISE 246943 0000626000 5440.5511 373.02 339946 101712010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, CO INC. 27.04. GLASS 00005201 246738 S181289 1553.6530 27.04 339947 10/7/2010 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 25.81 KEYS 00001636 246831 CH- 543162 1646.6406 25.81 339948 10 /712010 103976 STEINBACH, BRUCE 137.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 247013 0929101- 1646.6201 137.94 339949 10!112010 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 4,380.35 CONSULTING SERVICES 246739 8336 5500.1705 4,380.35 339950 10/7/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 2,072.84 VEHICLE.REPAIRS, 00005243 246740 579361 1553.6180 _ 48.13 HANDLE 00005159 246741 263669 1553.6530 . 88.52 CAP 00005163 247014 264280 1553.6530 2,209.49 339951 1017/2010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 35.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 246651 1276820 1120.6120 42.90 'PUBLISH NOTICE 246652 1276821 1120.6120 230.59 PUBLISH: NOTICE 246653 1276819 1120.6120 39.83 PUBLISH NOTICE 246654 1275600 1120.6120 46.48 PUBLISH NOTICE 246655 1275599 1120.6120 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 24 Business Unit WELL PUMPS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS' EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION. ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION _ R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10!7/2010 — 10/712010 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 42.90 PUBLISH HEARING NOTICE 246656 - 1274450 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 437.95 135.00 OPERATOR TRAINING (3) 247015 339952 1017/2010 120998 SURLYPREWING CO. CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 135.00 1,110.00 247080. MVP01655 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 787 00 247081 MVP01651 5862 5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TRAINING ELECTION GRILL BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS PLANNING BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,154.05 247082 610406 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7600 247083 610407 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,230.05 339961 1P' -10 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 1,897.00 339953 10!712010 106441 SUSA 135.00 OPERATOR TRAINING (3) 247015 100110 5919.6104' CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 135.00 339964 101712010 117049 SYNERGY GRAPHICS' 341.30, TRANSFER CASES FOR GENERAL 246657 52563 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 341.30 339955 101712010 111616 T.D.. ANDERSO_ N, INC. 38.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 246944 964584 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38.00 339956 1017/2010 105982 T.P.C. LANDSCAPE 723.92 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246659 412200 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 723.92 339957 1017/1010 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 108.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 246945 093010 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ' 108.00 339958 101712010. 113649 TENNIS WEST 2,571.00 TOOL CRIB FOR PARKS STORAGE. 00001654 246805 10-777 -531 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,571.00 ti 339959 101712010 101 326 ,' TERMINAL= SUPPLY CO 375.48 FUSES, CONNECTORS 00005197 246742 84677 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 375.48 339960 1017/2010 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY TRAINING ELECTION GRILL BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS PLANNING BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,154.05 247082 610406 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7600 247083 610407 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,230.05 339961 1P' -10 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 26 10!7/2010 - 10/7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 200.00 DRAFT COUNCIL MINUTES 9!7110 246658 M17947 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 200.00 339962 10/712010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 144.29 LAWN CARE 00001653 246743 127383 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 144.29 339963 101712010 104413 TUCKER, SUSAN 100.00 CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT 247045 1922 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 100.00 339964 101712010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 105.00 NEW EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL 247016 101707988 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 105.00 339966 10x712010 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 77.48 GRASS SEED 00001639 246660 24120 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 17.40 MULCH, GRASS SEED 00001683 246744 24005 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 94.88 339966 101712010 123566 TWIN TOWN IRRIGATION INC. 297.82 SPRINKLER REPAIR 246661 90933 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 297.82 339967 101712010 101066 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 225.00 WORKSHOP - WAYNE HOULE 246806 092710 1240.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 225.00 339968 1017/2010 101066 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 220.00 RECERTIFICATION WORKSHOP 247030 2010 LPAT 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 220.00 339969 1017/2010 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 8.13 SHIP SAMPLES 00001728 246745 TRAN:4368 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 156.02 SHIP H2O SAMPLES 00001772 247017 TRAN:9189 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 164.15 339970 101712010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 136.78 LOCATING FLAGS 00001711 246746 241357 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 136.78 339971 1017/2010 119476 USPCA REGION 12 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 27 10/712010 - 10f7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 'i Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.00 CLASS REGISTRATION FEE 246946 093010 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 339972 101712010 100060 USPS- HASLER 1,000.00 TMS # 202739 246832 092910 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,000.00 339973 1017/2010 102909 VADNAIS, SCOTT 100.00 UNIFORM SHOES 246947 093010 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 339974 10/7/2010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 3,223.47 REPLACE BROKEN HYDRANT 00001724 246747 15812 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,223.47 339976 1017/2010 102276 VAN BLOEM GARDENS 36.57 NARCISSUS BULBS 00002170 247018 2042820 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 154.09 BULBS 00002170 247019 2042792 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 190.66 339976 10 /7/2010 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 70.00 ROLL TOWEL 00001632 246662 173649 -01 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13.17 CAN LINERS 00001603 246663 172528 -02 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 460.20 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 246948 173523 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 512.59 CAN LINERS, CUPS, TOWELS 00006347 246949 174064 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,055.96- 339977 1017/2010 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 403.00 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION 00001211 246748 146474 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 403.00 339978 10 1712010 119464 VINOCOPIA 94.75 246849 0029970 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.75 339979 101712010 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 32.99 'UNIFORM PURCHASE 246749 092710 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.99 339980 10 /712010 100.023 VOGEL; ROBERT C. . 2,250.010 4TH QTR CONSULTING 246750 210035 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES' PLANNING 2,250.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017/2010 - 1017/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 339981 1017/2010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 242.11 LIGHTING 246950 15162869 -00 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 242.11 339982 10/7/2010 124959 W. L. HALL COMPANY 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 28 Business Unit VERNON OCCUPANCY 480.00 55.78 EPW GLASS 00005049 247020 27362 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 55.78 267.19 FLEET KEYS 00005150 246751 0041756 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 339983 1017/2010 120009 WALL ENTERPRISES INC. 339989 10f7 /2010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 122.65 GRINDING WHEEL 00001270 246664 L- 921 -10 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 125.00 WEBINAR 122.65 100410 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 574.92 339984 10/7/2010 127307 WANNER, TOM 101033 - WINE COMPANY, THE 1,106.15 65.00 PISTOL LEAGUE REFUND 246951 093010 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 252358 -00 5842.5513 65.00 731.39 247085 ` 252323 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 339985 10/712010 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 108.92 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 246952` 093010 1400.6104 CONFERENCES B SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 108.92 _ 339986 10/7 /2010 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 566.06 OCT MAINTENANCE 246807: 100110 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 566.06 339987 10/7/2010 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 480.00 AUG 2010 CHARGES 246833 821275223 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 480.00 339988 1017/2010 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 267.19 FLEET KEYS 00005150 246751 0041756 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 267.19 339989 10f7 /2010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 449.92 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 246953 093010 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 125.00 WEBINAR 247101 100410 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 574.92 339990 10f712010 101033 - WINE COMPANY, THE 1,106.15 246823 251786 -00 5842.5513- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,089.50 247084 252358 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 731.39 247085 ` 252323 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING ASSESSING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 101612010 8:24:06 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 10!7/2010 - 10!7/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 144.20 247086 252337 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 256.00- 247087 251515 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 104.00- 247088 252110 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,711.24 339991 101712010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 271.12 246899 333272 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,12 246900 333271 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.00- 246901 50010 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.00- 246902 49971 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 243.24 339992 10/712010 102492 WIRTGEN AMERICA 126.89 SEALING RUBBER 00005155 246752 900146887 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.89 339993 10/7/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 31.02 246850 463549 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 22.54 246903 460084 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,591.95 246904 461891 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,103.03 246905 463543 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,163,29 246906 463540 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 115.62 246907 463545 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 312.00 246908 463544 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,108,12 246909 463546 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 97.98- 246910 810897 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 51.10- 246911 810660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,837.97 247089 463550 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,114.04 247090 463548 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,997.61 247091 463547 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,347.20 247092 460090 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 87.35- 247093 811158 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 41,507.96 339994 101712010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 100.00 247094 661796 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 296.10 247095 661588 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,588.95 247096 661795 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,529.00 247097 662093 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,514.05 339996 1r 1 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Council Check Register Page - 30 1017/2010 - 1017/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,019.92 HELMETS, VISORS 00003799 246954 W013003 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,019.92 339996 10/712010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 517.74 247098 254995 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.50- 247099 254736 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 504.24 339997 101712010 120223 WORTHINGTON, HEATHER 34.00 MEETING EXPENSES 247104 100410 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 34.00 339999 10/712010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,195.26 51- 5547446 -1 246665 254704021 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 59.71 51- 6692497 -0 246666 254724721 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 56.24 51 -4420190 -3 246667 254349733 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 40.50 51- 8997917 -7 246668 254591031 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 51.30 51- 8976004 -9 246669 254762397 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 42.95 51- 65410842 246670 254550173 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,251.58 51- 6223269 -1 246671 254544115 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 79.70 51- 9422326 -6 246672 254771902 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 160.33 51- 9337452 -8 246673 254772939 1321.618.5 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 187.70 51- 8987646 -8 246674 254766406 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,551.62 51- 5107681 -4 246675 254519844 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 9,115.95 51- 9603061 -0 246676 254612913 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 83.59 51- 8526048 -8 246677 254581412 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 372.55 51- 8324712 -5 246678 254580039 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.50 51- 68922245 246679 254557666 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 281.62 51- 9251919 -0 246680 254594624 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 69.15 51- 9608462 -5 246681 254781380 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 9.08 51- 60501842 246682 254541876 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 1,071.83 51- 9011854 -4 246683 254590764 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 202.47 51- 4621797 -2 246808 254523149 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 55.72 51- 97701647 246834 254610638 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 18.92 51- 9770163 -6 246835 254610256 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,127.80 51- 5847121 -5 247023 255388255 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 18,045.94 51 -4888627 -1 247024 255515681 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 36,167.01 340000 101712010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 148.83 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008034 246684 54066479 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 148.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # • Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 1,049,944.81 , Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/7/2010 — 10/7/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit — r- Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,049,944.81 Total Payments 1,049,944.81 10/6/2010 8:24:06 Page - 31 1 C. J 8:25:06 Page- 1 R55CKSUM 40000 CITY C JA Council Check Summary 10!712010 - 1017/2010 Company, Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 622,126.99 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,119.73 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 108,865.75 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 3,760.56 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,089.97 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,251.58 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 13,419.39 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 40,890.17 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 19,275.41 05800 LIQUOR FUND 138,794.32 05900 UTILITY FUND 56,719.23 05930 STORM SEWER FUND. 38,302.95 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 328.76 Report Totals 1,049,944.81 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and o _ procedures date __ /0/740 -vt Finance Directo TitiMani-ager 1 C. J 8:25:06 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 10/14/2010 - 10/1412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340001 1011412010 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 480.00 GYM MATS 00003811 247386 022018817 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 480.00 340002 10/14/2010 118636 A & B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 277.88 ALTERNATOR 00005248 247108 58075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 277.88 340003 1011412010 100613 AAA 1,372.85 PLATES/TITLE 247247 100410 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,372.85 340004 1011412010 100613 AAA 1,372.85 PLATES/TITLE 247248 100510 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,372.85 340006 10/1412010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 69.80 247188 0807713 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 34.20 247298 0807707 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 34.80 247497 0724682 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 138.80 340006 1011412010 120117 AL SWEET & THE SOMEWHAT DIXIEL 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 10/24/10 247479 100710 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 340007 10/14/2010 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 1,615.05 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 00002168 247449 7133 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,615.05 340008 10/1412010 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 661.58 FOOD 247250 1434602 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 661.58 340009. 10114/2010 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 486.27 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005256 247109 10073494 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 486.27 340010 10114/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 247110 100110 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 247110 100110 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 247110 100110 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDr= MIAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 2 10/14/2010 -10114/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.55 247110 100110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 73.92 247110 100110 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 81.29 247110 100110 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.66 247110 100110 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 88.77 247110 100110 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 247110 100110 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 146.78 247110 100110 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 197.25 247110 100110 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 238.25 247110 100110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 243.79 247110 100110 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 303.65 247110 100110 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 303.65 247110 100110 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.03 247110 100110 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 450.33 247110 100110 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 592.03 247110 100110 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 190.37 247438 OCT1 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,569.66 340011 10/1412010 100266 AT&T MOBILITY 49.87 247249 870517029X10021 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 0 49.87 340012 10/1412010 112706 AUFDERWORLD CORP. 4,181.58 TV / STAND, DVD PLAYER 00006106 247111 SI- 109742 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 4,181.58 340013 10/1412010 120995 AVR INC. 615.60 READY MIX 00001211 247387 38179 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 820.80 247388 38991 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 935.42 247389 39078 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 718.20 247390 39184 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 349.48 247391 39283 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,109.23 247392 39413 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 795.15 247393 39707 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 291.23 247394 39795 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 571.65 247395 40063 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 349.48 247396 40158 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 6,556.24 340014 1011412010 100638 BACHMAN'S 197.95 FLOWERS 00002375 247475 14423842 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 197.95 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 340015 1011412010 100638 BACHMAN'S 52.37 SHOVEL 52.37 LAWN CARE 340016 10/1412010 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,056.60 1,505.95 271.55 177.65 10114/2010 245.55 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 26.70 129.27 7.99 CUSTOM STAMPS 699.11 IN -19668 1.55 5.92 - 2,151.00 317.43 1011412010 1,691.48 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 572.30 288.35 109 -10 TOILET SERVICE CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 00002374 247476 24218 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 247189 55115400 247190 55100700 247191 55100800 247192 55115000 247193 55115700 247194 84261100 247195 84260900 247196 84261000 247299 55115100 247300 55115200 247301 84253800 247498 55217000 247499 55214500 247500 55213900 247501 55214000 247502 55216900 247503 84290700 247504 84279700 340017 10114/2010 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 622.55 LAWN CARE 247439 136156 622.55 340018 10114/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 51.51 CUSTOM STAMPS 247251 IN -19668 51.51 340019 1011412010 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 247112 23205 65.19 TOILET SERVICE 247113 23204 65.19 TOILET SERVICE 247114 23203 164.72 340020 1! 10 A01376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5515 5842.5515 5842.6406 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5515 5842.5515 7411.6136 1400.6406 5430.6182 5422.6182 5422.6182 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK-SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 4 10/14/2010 -10114/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 720.59 INSTALL NEW SAFE LOCK 00006116 247425 S71084 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 720.59 340021 10/14/2010 127313 BLUE MOON PACKAGING 59.00 BAGS 00006112 247115 4769 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 59.00 340022 1011412.010 116398 BOERGER, KEITH 35.70 FTO TRAIN ING.RElMBURSEMENT 247348 100510 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.70 340023 1011412010 127316 BONJEAN,,BLAKE 30.79 ,- UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 247349 6509 SHAWNEE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.79 340024 1011412010. 123414 BOOM, CHET 355.00 AGGREGATE PRODUCTION TRAINING 247350 100610 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 355.00 340025 10114/2010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,983.73 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003804 247397 87188887" 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 214.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003804 247398 87189259 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.41 FIRST AID. SUPPLIES 00002171 247450 87183834 5621.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 3.81 FIRST AID SUPPLIES - 00002171 247451 87184264 5621.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 3,295.15 340026 10/14/2010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS' 976.23 TRUCK RENTAL 00005259.. 247252 45968 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 976.23 340027 10/14/2010 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 10.18 PETTY CASH 247426 100710 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 11.18 PETTY CASH 247426 100710 5440.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 33.32. PETTY CASH 247426 100710 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 41.12 PETTY CASH, 247426 100710 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 44.00 'PETTY CASH 247426 100710 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 47.21 PETTY CASH 247426 100710 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 50.00 PETTY CASH 247426 100710 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 237.01 340028 10/1412010 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 73.98 MORTAR KIT 00007015 247253 12038347 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 GOLF CLUB 247427 921890098 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 147:00 199.00 Council Check Register 340032 10/14/2010 121683 CANEPA, AIMEE 340035 10/14/2010 10/14/2010 -10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.53 73.98 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229.00 340029 10/14/2010 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 430.00 3,010.15 210.54 LEDS FOR TRAFFIC LIGHTS 00001756 247351 023825 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING 431.25 210.54 247302 12832 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 340030 10/14/2010 43.21 119826. BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 12714 5822.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,555.45 167.35 NEWSLETTER 247254 22916 .5822.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 84.50 167.36 NEWSLETTER 247254 22916 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 167.36 NEWSLETTER 247254 22916 5862.6575 PRINTING . 502.07 340031 1011412010 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page- 5 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 147.00 GOLF CLUB 247427 921890098 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 147:00 199.00 340032 10/14/2010 121683 CANEPA, AIMEE 340035 10/14/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 80.53 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247255 100510 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.53 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229.00 340033 10/14/2010 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 430.00 3,010.15 247197 12722 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 431.25 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 247302 12832 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 529.10 43.21 247303 12714 5822.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,555.45 247304 12840 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 84.50 247505 12876 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,610.45 340034 10/14/2010 101307 CAREER TRACK 199.00 SEMINAR - S. QUIST 247352 12025144 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 199.00 340035 10/14/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 201.00 247305 87892 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229.00 247506 87881 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 430.00 340036. 10/14/2010 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 43.21 5590919 -6 247440 5590919 -9/10 74116582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 43.21 340037 10,' ?'110 127227 CFA SOFTWARE INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA' 340044 10/14/2010 101119 COCKRIEL „VINCE Council Check Register 56.50 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 00001784 247477 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,095.00 SUBSCRIPTION FEE 00005270 247452 10964 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING 101345 - COLOURS 1, 095.00 340038 10/14/2010 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHICS 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 10210 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156.95 247507 429294 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 68.95 247508 429295 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 225.90 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 340039 10/14/2010 177449 -9/10 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TELEPHONE 59.00 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page- 6 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 5.443.36 LAB SERVICE 00001731 247116 SEP2010 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 5,443.36 340040 10/14/2010 106194 CITY OF RICHFIELD 15 871.45 ' REIMBURSE SEWER SERVICE PMT 247256 3121 69TH ST W 5901.4641 SEWER CHARGES UTILITY REVENUES .15.871.45 340041 10/1412010 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.92 WINDOW.CLEANING 247257 470794 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 16.49 WINDOW CLEANING 247257 470794 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS, 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 247257 470794 5841:6180 -:CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 57:40 340.042 10114/2010 102165 :CLEVELAND GOLF 95.19 GOLF CLUB 247117 3318525 ,, -- 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 95.19 340043 10/14/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 207.00 247306 0148437719 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 207A0 340044 10/14/2010 101119 COCKRIEL „VINCE 56.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 00001784 247477 100810 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 56.50 340045 10/1412010 101345 - COLOURS 263.00 FLOOR PLAN GRAPHICS 247118 10210 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 263.00 340046 10/14/2010 120433 COMCAST 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 247119 177449 -9/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 247120 199138 -9/10 5422.6188 TELEPHONE 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 247121 165667 -9/10 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page- 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CUSTOMER.REFUND CONCRETE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ENGINEERING GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL STORM SEWER PSTF- OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT.SVC PW BUILDING . EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 247258 164959 -9/10 5430.6188 82.59 8772 10 614 0220686 247478 220686 -10/10 - 5620.6230 387.39 340047 10114/2010 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 920.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 247259 302261,62,63,64 5822.6122 920.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 247259 302261,62,63,64 5842.6122 920.34 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 247259 302261,62,63,64 5862.6122 - • 2,761.00 340048 10/14/2010 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION °;-125.00 'FEB 7 CLASS - J. SULLIVAN 247399 MNDOT 1260.6104 125.00 340049 10114/2010 127316 CREATIVE HOUSING 104.13 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 247353, 5119 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CIR 104.13 340050 10114/2010 121340':CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS MIDWE .^ 384.75 PRECAST CONE' 00001732 247400 , 5000021676 5932.6520 384.75 340061 10/14/2010 .100699. CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 97.37 114- 09855685 -4 - 247441 1329624 7411.6406 97.37 340052'..: 10/1412010 104020 DALCO 51.30 URINAL SCREENS 00001038 247354 2227549 1552.6406 97.92 TISSUE 00001454 247355 2239070 1552.6406 191.31. ,PUNCH, LPS 00005009 247356 2240918 1553.6530 215.89 PUNCH DEGREASER 00005019 247357 2241935 1553.6530 - 496.25 LPS 00005009 247358 2243652 1553.6530 192.45 HAND TOWELS, TISSUE, NAPKINS 00001454 247359 2245800 1552.6406 160.31 .TOWEL DISPENSERS 00001454 247360 2245528 1552.6406 1,405.43 340053 10/14/2010 102478 _DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,098.70 247307 571876 5842.5514 1,519.85 247308 571873 5862.5514 44.80 247309 571875 5822.5515 1,179.70 247310 570844 5822.5514 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page- 7 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CUSTOMER.REFUND CONCRETE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ENGINEERING GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL STORM SEWER PSTF- OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT.SVC PW BUILDING . EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - e 10/14/2010 -10114/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,354.40 247311 571874 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,197.45 340064 10/14/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 775.59 CORDLESS TOOLS 00001173 247361 519675 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 775.59 340055 10/14/2010 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 67.42 BAKERY 247122 345706 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 41.49 BAKERY 247123 345864 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 62.54 BAKERY 247124 345938 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 41.38 BAKERY 247260 346386 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.79 BAKERY 247428 346570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 281.62 340066 10/14/2010 101947 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1,920.00 CJDN CONNECT -3RD QTR 247261 P07MD02706001C 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 340057 10/14/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 22.75 247262 110312148 -9/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.75 247262 110312148 -9/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 22.75 247262 110312148 -9/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 538.22 247263 110311893 -9/201 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 0 115.40 110311867 247453 110311867 -9/10 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 721.87 340058 10/14/2010 122199 DOLL, MARTY 162.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247480 101110 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 162.00 340059 10114/2010 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 247264 26299 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 247264 26299 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 247264 26299 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,050.00 340060 10114/2010 122387 ECOLAB 537.38 TRISTAR CLEANER 00003816 247401 3584400 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 537.38 CITY OF EDINA 10/1312010 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 10/14/2010 -10114/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340061 10114/2010 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 385.90 WIRE 00001747 247454 07518100 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 385.90 340062 1011412010 101923 EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS 130.00 PROGRAM AD 247481 100710 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 130.00 PROGRAM AD 247481 100710 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART.CENTER ADMINISTRATION 130.00 PROGRAM AD 247481 100710 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 130.00 PROGRAM AD 247481 100710 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 130.00 PROGRAM AD 247481 100710 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 650.00 340063 1011412010 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 20.00 MEETING LUNCHEON 247429 28961 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 20.00 340064 10/14/2010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 42.05 BEER/WINE 00006338 247430 # 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 42.05 340065 10114/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,390.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 2008B 247125 61124 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 2008A 247126 61134 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 4,390.00 340066 10114/2010 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 987.85 E -81 REPAIRS 247402 51380 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 987.85 340067 10114/2010 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 66.79 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003713 247403 1313786 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.79 340068 10/14/2010 102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC. 9,825.02 DOCUMENT CAMERA 00004198 247431 174757 2210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 5,038.09- CREDIT 247432 174439C 2210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 4,786.93 340069 10/1412010 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 353.33 BRICKS 00001541 247362 91221 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES_ GENERAL STORM SEWER 353.33 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 10 10/1412010 —10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340070 1011412010 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,587.75 SEPT TRANSPORTS 247265 100410 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,587.75 340071 10/14/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 179.09 BRAKES 00005121 247404 69- 021640 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.09 340072 10/14/2010 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 68.63 BOLTS NAD NUTS 00005261 247127 MNTC2102999 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.18 SADDLE CLIPS 00005262 247128 MNTC2103041 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 93.81 340073 10/14/2010 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 155.98 BOOTS 00003817 247455 6754 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 155.98 340074 10/14/2010 103985 FLOR, JON 1,200.00 AD CONCEPTS 247129 2216 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,200.00 340075 10/14/2010 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 124.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247266 100110 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 124.00 340076 10/14/2010 119936 GLOBAL OAK 93.75 EDINBOROUGH E- COMMERCE 247433 010736 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 93.75 ART CENTER E- COMMERCE 247433 010736 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,562.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 247433 010736 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 3,750.00 340077 10/1412010 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.02 R -91 PHONE 247405 2520399 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.02 340078 1011412010 101178 GOPHER 545.00 SCOOTER, HOOPZ GOAL 247456 8188665 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 545.00 340079 10114/2010 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 200.00 -PARKING LOT STRIPING 00001661 247130 10127 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE 200:00 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 10114/2010 - 10/1412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340080 10/14/2010 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 401.85 GRAPHICS FOR VEHICLES 00005051 247406 71753 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 401.85 340081 10114/2010 101103 GRAINGER 147.64 TOOL BOX, GLOVES 00001721 247131 9356696501 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 13.33 LOCK 00001721 24.7132 9356864356 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 89.90 GARBAGE CANS 00006462 247133 9355040768 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 48.92 MARKERS, BATTERIES, PENS 00006460 247134 9352451406 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 42.07 LIGHT BULBS 00006458 247135 9344690400 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 148.66 ROPE 00002178 247457 9348958944 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 490.52 340082 1011412010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,751.00 247198 122685 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 196.50 247509 122900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,595.00 247510 122897 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,542.50 340083 10114/2010 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 91.17 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 247267 100510 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 91.17 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 247267 100510 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 108.22 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 247267 100510 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 290.56 340084 10/14/2010 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 3,735.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 247434 100710 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 3,735.00 340085 10/14/2010 101733 HANLY, WILLIAM 140.21 SAFETY SHOES 247482 100710 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 140.21 340086 1011412010 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 58.80 PIZZA 247136 1705878 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 58.80 340087 10114/2010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 203.06 LCD MONITOR 00004369 247137 48275811 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 203.06 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 12 10/14/2010 -10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340088 10114/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 108.00 247312 535914 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 60.00 247313 535961 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,614.38 247511 536701 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,782.38 340089 10114/2010 103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND 50.00 ENTERTAINMENT 10/17/10 247138 100110 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50.00 340090 10114/2010 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 1,623.41 BIRTHDAY PARTY ITEM PRINTING 247458 30182 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,623.41 340091 1011412010 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 307.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247483 100710 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 307.50 340092 10/14/2010 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 12.00 MILEAGE - AUG /SEPT 247268 100610 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 449.70 MILEAGE - AUG /SEPT 247268 100610 1240.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 461.70 340093 10/14/2010 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 47.75 FTO TRAINING EXPENSES 247363 100510 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 47.75 340094 10114/2010 100612 IAAO 415.00 12/9/10 SEMINAR 247139 100410 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 415.00 340095 10/14/2010 100812 IAAO 150.00 STUDENT REFERENCE MANUALS 247484 100810 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 150.00 340096 10/14/2010 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 585.88 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS 247459 D216507 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 585.88 340097 10/14/2010 121307 ISKIERKA, JOY 160.44 SUGA TRAINING EXPENSES 247269 100510 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 160.44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 340098 10/14/2010 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/14/2010 -10/14/2010 Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No 100386 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC. 91.72 FERTILIZER 00002057. 247460 0045947 -IN 5630.6540 51.76 FERTILIZER 00002036 247461 0047981 -IN 5630.6540 143.48 340099 1011412010 100828 JERRY S FOODS 3.72 10.66 10.78 13.98 15.64 18.98 20.05 44.08 48.96 51.80 . 66.45 305.10 340100 10/1412010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF-,MINN 1,863.10 68.00 12,843.35 38.10 3,263.30 934.95 19,010.80 Subledger Account Description FERTILIZER FERTILIZER 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 13 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES 247462 100410 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 247462 100410 1600.4390.49 BARNYARD BOOGIE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 247462 100410 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 247462 100410 1401.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 247462 100410 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 247462 100410 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 247462 100410 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 247462 100410 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 247462 100410 1628.6406.02 GOLF SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 247462 100410 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 247462 100410 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 247314 1433262 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 247315 999451 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 247512 1433310 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 247513 1433311 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 247514 1433302 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 247515 1433303 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 340101 10/1412010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES / LESCO 187.03 TRACKER 247140 55910573 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 187:03 340104 10/14/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 144.75 247199 1918342 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 444.95 247200` 1918341 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 242.24 247201 1917860 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 625.67 247202 1917861 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,098,87 247203- 1917862 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,052.48 247204 1917863 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 66.56 -247205 1917864 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 304.87 ;247206 1917865 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING" R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 340106 10/1412010 Amount Supplier / Explanation 10,404.52 537.11 1,281.97 2,865.50 1.12 1,629.09 1,146.88 522.34 120.00 1.12 - 75.52- 18.00- 9.00- 75.52- 744.00 1.315.92 549.76 872.65 530.23 3,255.71 787.59 752.04 521.66 1,660.01 2,522.74 223.74 2,142.05 2.24 4,676.77 2,639.83 482.39 185.24 630.24 2,568.19 1.12 230.47- 49,143.41 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 416.94 COOLER FAN MOTOR 416.94 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/14/2010 -10/14/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 247207 1917885 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247208 1917881 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247209 1917882 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247210 1917887 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247211 1917868 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247212 1917884 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247213 1917886 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247316 1914759 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247317 1914035 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247318 473330 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247319 473329 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247320 473327 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247321 473328 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247322 473326 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247516 1922282 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247517 1922281 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247518 1922280 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247519 1922284 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247520 1922283 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247521 1922299 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247522 1922445 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247523 1922296 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247524 1922295 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247525 1922298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247526 1922297 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247527 1922294 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247528 1922293 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247529 1922287 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247530 1922292 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247531 1922291 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247532 1922289 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247533 1922288 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247534 1922285 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247535 1922290 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247536 1922286 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 247537 473333 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 247271 063369 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 14 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 15 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ICE MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST- SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /'Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 340106 10/14/2010 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 106.66 VACUUM BAGS 00006081 247270 112123 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES " 106.66 340107 1011412010 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 111.38 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247272 100510 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 111.38 340108 10/14/2010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 117.54. UNIFORMS 00003747 247407 141969 -07 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 26.99 UNIFORMS 00003778 247408. 149487 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 149.93 UNIFORMS 00003777 247409 148521 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 294.46 340109 10/14/2010 125571 KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC. 1,603.76 COOLING TOWER TREATMENT 00008031 247364 113317 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,603.76 . 340110 10114/2010 126929 LAKE IMPROVEMENT CONSULTING LL 443.75 POND TREATMENT 247141 1078 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 443.75 340111 10114/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 307.28 TY -RAP, FITTINGS 00005200 247142 9630251 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 497.40 HOSE, DRILLS 00005169 247143 9635327 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 339.76 FLAP WHEELS, WASHERS; TY -RAP 00005206 247485 9655483 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,144.44 340112 10/14/2010 127314 LENZ, SARAH 194.00 CLASS REFUND 247365 100510 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 194.00 340113 1011412010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 130.00 247323 10805 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 390.00 247538 10878 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ' 182.00 247539 10879 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 702.00 340114 10/1412010 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 23.00 PATROL JACKET 247486 100810. 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 23.00 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 15 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ICE MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST- SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/14/2010 — 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - 340115 10/14/2010 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 89.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247144 100510 1554.6107 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 247145 100410 1554.6230 140.80 340116 10/14/2010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 86.19 COIL 00005264''247366 2105675 1553.6530 86.19 340117 10/14/2010 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 400.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 247410 7094 1470.6103 400.00 - 340118 10/14/2010 100875 MCCARENMESIGNS INC. 2,892.43 REMOVE TREES 8 STUMPS 00002399 247463 49307 5630.6180 289.24- CREDIT 247464 49744 5630.6180 2,603.19 340119 10/1412010 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,277.00. "FALL TRIP 247367 100410 1628.6103.07 2,277.00 340120 1011412010 .101987 MENARDS 227.95. HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS . 247465.- 27909 5620.6406 .227.95 '340121 10114/2010 124091 MESSETLER, GREG 75.81 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247369 100710 2310.6104 75.81 340122 10/14/2010 100885 METRO SALES INC 3,874.28 COPIER USAGE/MAINTENANCE 247368 381223 1550.6230 3,874.28 340123 10/14/2010 124301 METRO.WEST IRRIGATION AND LAND 90.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYS 247411 8543 1470.6215 90.00 " 340124 10/14/2010 100887. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 355,505.96 SEWER SERVICE 247273 0000942757 5922.6302 355,505.96 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 16 Subledger Account Description Business Unit MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS E911 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .SEWER SERVICE METRO FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER TREATMENT CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 10/1412010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340125 10/14/2010 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 10/7/10 247442 100810 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 340126 10/1412010 104650 MICRO CENTER 47.36 I.T. SUPPLIES 00004359 247274 2890491 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 282.09 I.T. TEST PC 00004367 247275 2933232 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 59.76 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00009257 247276 2938346 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 139.46- CREDIT 247277 MC2609116 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 96.12 DVDS 00003146 247435 2970636 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 345.87 340127 10114/2010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 21.24 CO25 247436 R109100120 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 43.44 CO2 TANKS 247443 R109100254 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 64.68 340128 10114/2010 127320 MINNESOTA CIT OFFICER'S ASSOCI 7,425.00 CRISIS INTERVENTION TRAINING 247444 20093010 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 7,425.00 340129 10114/2010 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 170.13 POSTAGE MACHINE INK CARTRIDGE 247146 64022 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 170.13 340130 10/14/2010 103370 MINNESOTA STATEWIDE 9 -1 -1 PROG 62.83 5/30/10 INTERPRETING SERVICE 247370 062110 2310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES E911 62.83 340131 10114/2010 105430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY 2,448.97 GAS CYLINDER CABINETS 00005986 247371 M58855 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 2,448.97 340132 10114/2010 126997 MISSION ELECTRIC LLC 80.00 LIGHT REPAIRS 247278 093010 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 787.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 00008038 247372 SEPT30 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 867.00 340133 10114/2010 124467 MN MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC. 368.72 WHEELS 00002323 247466 18232 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 368.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 18 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 340134 10/1412010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 58.21 MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00005209 247373 484857F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.21 340135 1011412010 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT 10/21/10 247147 100510 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 340136 10114/2010 102551 NFPA 293.14 PUBLIC EDUCATION 00003803 247412 4976288Y 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 626.63 PUBLIC EDUCATION 00003803 247413 4979640Y 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 919.77 340137 10/14/2010 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 405.11 PIPE 00001754 247279 185694 01360.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 405.11 PIPE 00001754 247279 185694 01362.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 810.22 340138 1011412010 126184 NORTHSTAR MEDIA SERVICES LLC 85.50 KSTP5 NEWS CLIP COPY 247374 6247 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.50 340139 1011412010 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 97.44 FLOOR DRY 00003815 247414 1 -9113 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 97.44 340140 1011412010 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 OCT MAINTENANCE 247375 80273906 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 340141 10/14/2010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 36.21 REGISTER PAPER 00006034 _247280 1263322940 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 36.19 PLANNER, STAMP 00006034 247281 1262635691 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 33.65 FAX TONER 00008026 247376 534198789001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 106.05 340142 10/1412010 124676 OKEE DOKEE BROTHERS 200.00 ENTERTAINMENT 10/28/10 247488 100810 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 340143 10/14/2010 118891 OLSON, LYNN CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit _87.01 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247282 100510 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 87.01 340144 10/14/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,727.03 247324 8277479 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,253,27 247540 8277490 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,980.30 340146 1011412010 126492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 SEPTACTIVITY 247148 8718766 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) - 39.95 340146 10/14/2010 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY. 346.65 247149 63867744 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL - 235.82 247283 63867822 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 582.47 340147 10/14/2010 100960 PETTY CASH 2,67 247246 100610 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 3.00 247246 100610 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 4,28.. 247246 100610 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION - 4.99 247246 100610 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 5.29 247246 100610 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 5.35 247246 100610 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5.50 247246 100610 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION ,7.00 247246 100610 5910.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL (BILLING) 7.00 247246 100610 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 7.00 247246 100610 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 7,24 247246 100610 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL'ADMINISTRATION 13.00 247246 100610 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 15.00 247246 100610 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 16.00 247246 100610 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 16.00 247246 100610 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 18.40 247246 .. 100610 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL - 18.50 247246 100610 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 20.00 247246 100610 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 20.00 247246 100610 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 20.00 247246 100610 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 23,79 247246 100610 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 24.15 247246 100610 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 25.00 247246 100610 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 26.00 247246 100610 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING I .R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 26.00 26.00 26.00 30.70 30.97 37.49 45.47 47.00 47.45 106.00 138.00 876.24 340149 10/14/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE S SPIRITS 1,860.84 1,424.00 6,527.45 747.34 1.12 691.20 1,483.47 8514 1,029.59 2.24 3,021.87 - 45.07 519.84 4,020.41 431.82 611.84 935.84 799.62 289.88 167.42 873.69 564.40 26,134.19 247214 2969237 247215 2969235 247216 2969231 247217 2969232 247218 2969230 247219 2969233 247220 2969238 247221 2969234" 247222 2969240 247541 2972583 247542 2972579 247543 2972580 247544 . 2972577 247545 2972582 247546 2972581 247547 2972586 247548 2972578 247549 2972584 247550 2972585 247551 2972575 247552` 2972574 247553 2972576 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822:5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 340160 10/14/2010 100119 PING 104.13 GOLF CLUB 247150 10430016 5440.5511 104.13 Subledger Account Description -MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page- 20 Business Unit VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL ELECTION CITY HALL GENERAL ..ASSESSING ENGINEERING GENERAL FINANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING" 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 247246 100610 5860.6107 247246 100610 5860.6107 247246 100610 5660.6107 247246 100610 1180.6406 247246 100610 1551.6406 247246 100610 1190.6406 247246 100610 1260.6107 247246 100610 1160.6106 247246 100610 1550.6107 247246 100610 2210.6406 247246 100610 2210.6107 340149 10/14/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE S SPIRITS 1,860.84 1,424.00 6,527.45 747.34 1.12 691.20 1,483.47 8514 1,029.59 2.24 3,021.87 - 45.07 519.84 4,020.41 431.82 611.84 935.84 799.62 289.88 167.42 873.69 564.40 26,134.19 247214 2969237 247215 2969235 247216 2969231 247217 2969232 247218 2969230 247219 2969233 247220 2969238 247221 2969234" 247222 2969240 247541 2972583 247542 2972579 247543 2972580 247544 . 2972577 247545 2972582 247546 2972581 247547 2972586 247548 2972578 247549 2972584 247550 2972585 247551 2972575 247552` 2972574 247553 2972576 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822:5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 340160 10/14/2010 100119 PING 104.13 GOLF CLUB 247150 10430016 5440.5511 104.13 Subledger Account Description -MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page- 20 Business Unit VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL ELECTION CITY HALL GENERAL ..ASSESSING ENGINEERING GENERAL FINANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING" 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 21 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS TRAINING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ARENA ICE MAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 340151 10/14/2010 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 44.52 PEST CONTROL 247445 1946131 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44.52 340152 10/14/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 2,163.56 TIRES 00001134 247284 693597 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 189.56 TIRES 00005252 247415 865105 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 55.00- CREDIT 247416 845442 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,298.12 340153 10/14/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 247285 100610 1628.6235 POSTAGE 350.00 340154 10/14/2010 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 342.57 TRAINING EXPENSES 247467 100710 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 342.57 340156 10/14/2010 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 169.93 SHELF TAGS 247286 057038 5622.6575 PRINTING 169.93 SHELF TAGS 247286 057038 5842.6575 PRINTING 169.93 SHELF TAGS 247286 057038 5862.6575 PRINTING 509.79 340156 10/14/2010 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 54.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008039 247377 249824 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 54.00 340157 10/14/2010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 446.50 ROLL TOWELS, TISSUE, LINERS 00002183 247468 4963 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 446.50 340158 10/14/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 11,868.91 247223 362158 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 13,028.80 247224 362156 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 49,99- 247225 362001 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,538.35 247325 364903 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 499.20 247326 364621 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 478.10 247327 364944 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,284.23 247328 364622 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 623.60 247329 364945 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 486.53 247330 364623 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 21 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS TRAINING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ARENA ICE MAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 22 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,029.40 247331 364973 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 684.85 247332 364886 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,926.72 247554 364885 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.00- 247555 363705 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 34, 392.70 340159 10/14/2010 123898 QWEST 55.92 247287 092810 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.62 247287 092810 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 113.66 247287 092810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 117.32 247287 092810 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 138.24 247287 092810 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 166.05 247287 092810 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 204.14 247287 092810 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 234.92 247287 092810 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.59 247287 092810 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,057.40 247287 092810 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,412.86 340160 10/14/2010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001822 247378 819 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,009.25 340161 10/1412010 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 225.29 SEED BOTTLES 00006461 247151 CD1385058 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 225.29 340162 10114/2010 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 3,684.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE 247288 95268 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 3,684.00 340163 10/14/2010 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 4,542.20 POOL CHAIR LIFT 00002187 247469 210276 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 4,542.20 340164 10/14/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DO GRILL AND CHILL 47.98 ICE CREAM CAKES 247470 529 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 47.98 340165 10/14/2010 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 265.45 URINAL REPAIR 00006096 247289 55854 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 265.45 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 10114/2010 —10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /. Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger 'Account Description Business Unit 340166 10114/2010 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 195.31 TINT WINDSHIELD 00005238 247152 60487 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 195.31 340167 10/14/2010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 74.60 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 247417 00241410 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.14 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 247418 00240781 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.74 340168 10/1412010 100986 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 78.84 RUBBER SCRAPERS 00005166 247290 C56526 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.84 340169 10/1412010 100988 _SAFETY KLEEN 1,992.46 HASMAT RECYCLING - 00001215--247379 52071633 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,992.46 340170 10/14/2010 116644 SANDON, PATRICK 200.00 UNIFORM BOOTS 247419 100510 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 340171 10/14/2010 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 243.10 PAINT & SUPPLIES 247380 7348 -2 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 243.10 340172 10114/2010 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 432.32 ALARM MONITORING 247471 73851595 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE EDINBOROUGH PARK 849.00 ADD MOTION SENSORS 247472 65956771 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 432.32 ALARM MONITORING 247473 73851594 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,713.64 340173 10/14/2010 124759 SISTERMAN, MATT 51.10 CELL PHONE'REIMBURSEMENT 247487 100810 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT- CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.10 340174 10/14/2010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 4,194.75 4TH QTR DUES 247446 8484 1470.6221 RANGE RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,485.25 4TH QTR DUES 247446 8484 1400.6221 RANGE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9,680.00 340176 10/14/2010 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/14/2010 -10/1412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,623.47 4TH QTR DUES 247153 201017 2210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 24 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,623.47 340176 10114/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 37.22 PVC PIPE 00001730 247154 S2266918.001 5921.6406 37.22 340177 1011412010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 2,994.05 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005255 247155 SF07140 1553.6180 2,994.05 ' 340178 10/14/2010 100,660 STANLEY: SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 191.35 KEYS 00001636 247156 CH- 543261 1646.6406 - 191.35 340179 10114/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 125.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005257 .247157 579830 1553.6180 2,036.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005254 247158 579614 1553.6180 236.69 LAMPS "00005202.247420 265254 1553.6530 2,397.69 - 340180 1011412010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS .117.98 .SPECIALASSESSMENT &NOTICE 247159 1278164 `. 1120.6120 96.53 AERIAL DEVICE AFB 247160 1278163 1120.6120 214.51 340181 1011412010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 920.00 247333 MVP01652 5822.5514 920.00 34018.2 1011412010 105441 SUSA . 45.00 OCT 26, 2010 SCHOOL 247489 100610 5919.6104 45.00 340183 10/14/2010 127317 T & H DELIVERY INC. 280.00 REMOVE APPLIANCES 00005136 247421 12080 1552.6180 280.00 340184 1011412010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY - 460.00 247161 00772602 5421.5514 105.50 247162 610598 5421.5514 ' 2,489.30 247556 611322 5862.5514 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 24 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10/1312010 7:46:12 Page- 25 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 420 00 DRAFT COUNCIL MINUTES 247163 M17962 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 420.00 340188 10/14/2010 101474. TITLEIST 302.86 MERCHANDISE 247164 CITY OF EDINA 5440.5511 R55CKREG LOG20000 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 65.00- CREDIT 247165 6000533 . 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Council Check Register 237.86 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,054.80 176.10 WELDING GAS 00005172 247382 340185 `10/14/2010 WELDING SUPPLIES 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 39.48 WELDING CYLINDERS 247474. 421.13 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 00008037 247381 658265 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 215.58 421.13 340186 10/14/2010 340190 10114/2010 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 450.00 FITNESS TRAINING 247422 336 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF COURSE LABELS 00006118 247437 450.00 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 340187 10/1412010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 10/1312010 7:46:12 Page- 25 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 420 00 DRAFT COUNCIL MINUTES 247163 M17962 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 420.00 340188 10/14/2010 101474. TITLEIST 302.86 MERCHANDISE 247164 2007981 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 65.00- CREDIT 247165 6000533 . 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 237.86 340189 1011412010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 176.10 WELDING GAS 00005172 247382 324133 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.48 WELDING CYLINDERS 247474. 409577 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 215.58 340190 10114/2010 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 199.42 GOLF COURSE LABELS 00006118 247437 25912 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 199.42 340191 10/14/2010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 64.13 WEED CONTROL 00001793 247490 282681 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 106.88 WEED CONTROL 00001792 247491 282675 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 101.54 WEED CONTROL 00001790 247492 282676 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 112.22 WEED CONTROL 00001789 247493 282683 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 90.85 WEED CONTROL 00001788 247494 282660 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 475.62 340192 1011412010 126061 TUBBS, KIMBERLY 112.83 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 247291 100510 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.83 340193 10/14/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 122.82 CABLES, BELTS 00006647 247166 S124878 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 26 10/1412010 -10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 122.82 340194 10/14/2010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 220.00 HEP B & TB VACCINES 247495 101710675 1400.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - 220.00 340195 10/1412010 122127 UPS FREIGHT 67.50 FREIGHT CHARGES 247447 920991105 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 67.50 340196 1011412010 122564 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 74.44 OXYGEN 00003649 247423 854867 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.44 340197 1011412010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 21.58 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 247292 175001 -00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 110.95 LIQUOR BAGS 247292 175001-00- 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 132.53 340198 10/1412010 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 960.76 BATTERIES, WINDSHIELD KIT 00005247 247167 51611 15536530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119.20 . MESSAGE - HOLDER KITS 00006343 247168 51402 5423.6406 'GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,079.96 340199 1011412010 119464 VINOCOPIA 1,461.50 247226 0030232 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 756.00 247227 0030233 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD _WINE YORK SELLING 474.00 247228 0030237 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 339.75 247334 0030236 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 224.00 " 247557 0030518 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 376.50 247557 0030518 -IN 5822:5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,631.75 340200 10/14/2010 '- 124469 W.P.'& R.S. MARS CO. 101.10 BATTERY 00002397 247496 503094 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 101.10 340201 10/14/2010 107973' WILMOT, SOLVEI 18.00' MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247383 AUG 2010 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING 94.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 247383 AUG 2010 • 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 112.50 Subledger Account Description .CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES, COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 27 ASSESSING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING SOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK-SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLIN! CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/14/2010 - 10/1412010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 340202 1011412010 114588. WILSON, ROBERT C. 35.00 WEBINAR 247293 100510 1190.6104 -35.00 340203 10114/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 2,089.50 247229 252338 -00 5862.5513 1,857.00, 247230 252213 -00 5822.5513 1,517.45 247558 252774 -00 5842.5513 1,331.80 247559 252898 -00 58625513 6,795.75 340204 10/14/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 684.40 247231 333947 5822.5513 97,12 247232 333948 5862.5513 2,122.00 247233 333950 5862.5513 3,320.45 247234 333949 5842.5513 918.04 247560 334948 5842.5513 1,95314 247561- 334949 5862.5513' - 105.12 247562 334947 5822.5513 9,200.27 340205 10114/2010 117482 "WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 'WEB= AUG2010 247294 649 5842.6406 '- 159.24 340206 10/14_/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 8,201.70 247235 463.541 5862.5512 48.00- 247236 812081 5842:5513 8.00- 247237 811840 5842:5513 14.00- 247238 811839 5842.5513 135.99 247335 467344 5842.5513 5,447.45 247336 465458 5862.5513 3,869.24 247337 465352 5862.5513 73.10 247338 467335 _ 5862.5515 95.90 247339 464407 5862.5513 121.16 247340 467340 5822.5515 48.00- 247341 812080 5822.5513 5,447.45 247563 465460 5842.5513 5,189.84 247564 647341 5842.5513 73.10 247565 467342 5842.5515 5,460.22 247566 467343 5842.5512 5,106.38 247567 467334 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description .CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES, COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 27 ASSESSING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING SOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK-SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLIN! R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 28 10/1412010 -10/14/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,389.92 247568 467336 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,500.00- 247569 811039 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,999.00- 247569 811039 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,000.00- 247569 811039 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35,994.45 340207 10/14/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 249.80 247169 664341 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,703.80 247239 664829 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.20 247240 664548 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,847.90 247241 664547 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,720.78 247242 664536 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,881.35 247243 662654 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20.00- CREDIT ON INV 622672 247244 000688 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,736.00 247342 665377 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 247343 665378 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,177.25 247344 664318 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 71.85 247345 664319 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 60.00 247346 664320 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,337.75 247570 667183 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 30.40 247571 667184 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 168.00 247572 666985 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,199.66 247573 666984 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 36.90 247574 666986 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21,309.14 340208 1011412010 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 76.00 SHIELD 00003799 247424 W013003.001 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.00 340209 10/14/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 985.45 247245 254994 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,171.70 247347 255326 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,157.15 340210 10/14/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 204.90 51- 5938955 -6 247170 255223883 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 4,256.86 51- 6621207 -1 247171 255391388 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,287.24 51- 9013604 -6 247172 255429672 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 765.30 51- 5634814 -2 247173 255214934 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,084.35 51- 6979948 -4 247174 255397443 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,523.77 51- 6979948 -4 247174 255397443 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,817.00 51- 6979948 -4 29.84 51- 4151897 -6 34.12 51- 7567037 -0 180.95 51- 6229265 -9 1,990.84 51- 6229265 -9 668.41 51- 6046826 -0 619.46 51- 6137136 -8 3,098.42 51- 4827232 -6 30,116.97 514621797 -2 34.39 51- 8102668 -0 4,972.16 514966303 -6 2,844.57 514159265 -8 56,529.55 255222009 340211 10/14/2010 CITY OF EDINA RANGE Council Check Register MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 10/1412010 -10/1412010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 247174 255397443 5841.6185 247175 255351730 1646.6185 247176 255404195 1321.6185 247177 255223375 1481.6185 247177 255223375 1470.6185 247178 255222009 5422.6185 247179 255537917 5430.6185 247180 255026998 5311.6185 247181 255025293 1321.6185 247182 255089452 1321.6185 247183 255211406 1330.6185 247448 254348527 7411.6185 340211 10/14/2010 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100568 XEROX CORPORATION RANGE GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GASOLINE 56.28 COPIER USAGE - -247295 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 050579180 COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE 239.33 SEPT USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 247296 050579064 226.74 SEPT USAGE- BLDG /ENG 00004322 247297 050579063 522.35 340212 10/14/2010 118028 YAHOOI CUSTODIAN,OF RECORDS 20.44 LEGAL PROCESS COSTS 247384 159522 20.44 340213 , 10/14/2010 119647 'YOCUM OIL COMPANY-INC. 8,433.81. DIESEL.FUEL 00001010 247184 402280 575.78 GAS 00006403 247185 401312 812.25 GAS 00006403 247186 401313 1,123.91 DIESEL FUEL 00006404 247187 401314 14,234.43 UNLEADED FUEL 00001010 247385 403253 25,180.18. 340214 10/14/2010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC .. 1,062.50 247575 9816 737.00 247576 9834 1,799.50 863,912.25 Grand Total 1628.6103 1550.6151 1550.6151 1400.6103 1553.6581 5424.6406 5422.6581 5422.6581 1553.6581 5842.5513 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 863,912.25 Total Payments 863,912.25 10/13/2010 7:46:12 Page - 29 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POOL OPERATION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TRAFFIC SIGNALS PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERALSUPPLIES RANGE GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 128,268.51 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 14,861.90 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 299.08 03300 'PIR DEBT. SERVICE FUND .2,390.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUNIJ . 3,024.37 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,448.97 05100 ART CENTER FUND 522.22 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND: 3,309.64 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 20,011.23 05500 ICE ARENA FUND,. `i 3,262.76 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 16,207.67 05800 ' LIQUOR FUND 262,017.88 :- 05900 UTILITY FUND . 388,180.88 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 7,710.61 05950 RECYCLING FUND 18.00 •07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 11,378:53 Report Totals 863,912.25 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 10114/2010- 10/1412010 We confirm to the best'-of our knowledge and belief, that#hese claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies,and 10/1 _.i10 7:47:06 Page - - 1 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 8/26/10- 9/27/10 Card Holder lerchar Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/30 $434.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/30 $427.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/30 $519.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 , VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/30 $519.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/30 $519.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/08/30 $519.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/01 $162.78 THERMAL PAPER ROLL PAPER ROLLS & RIBBONS 201 - 684 -1730 NJ 5621.6513 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/09 $35.42 PARK PROGRAM SUPPLIES ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800 - 2280475 NE 1600.4390.49 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/10 $77.77 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY 800 - 528 -5599 RI 5621.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/10 $91.43 TV MOUNTS FOR UTILITIES MONOPRICE COM 909 - 989 -6887 CA 05508.1705.3' JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/14 $26.97 CENTENNIAL LAKES SUPPLIES ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800 - 2280475 NE 5631.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/15 $128.24 BALLHOP TRAVEL CART GOLFSMITH INTERNATIONA 800- 925 -7709 TX 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/16 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5620.5510 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/16 $56.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/17 $31.83 YOUTH SUMMER SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/20 $214.54 COMPACT PA SYSTEM GUITAR CENTER #392 EDINA MN 5410.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/20 $107.27 COMPACT PA SYSTEM GUITAR CENTER #392 EDINA MN 5410.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/21 $972.00 METAL LETTERS FOR SIGN ALPHABETSIGNS 800 - 582 -6366 DE 5630.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/22 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/22 $755.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/09/24 $105.57 OTHER DIRECT MARKETER RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY 800 - 528 -5599 RI 5621.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/08/25 $139.40 SUGA CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0067915733604 SAN ANTONIO TX 2310.6104 JEFF LONG 2010/08/25 $139.40 SUGA CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0067915733605 SAN ANTONIO TX 2310.6104 JEFF LONG 2010/08/25 $139.40 SUGA CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0067915733606 SAN ANTONIO TX 2310.6104 JEFF LONG 2010/09/03 $17.46 NOTEBOOKS J.L. DARLING CORPORATIO1253- 9225000 WA 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/09/03 $46.20 NOTEBOOKS J.L. DARLING CORPORATIO1253- 9225000 WA 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/09/08 $492.23 TACTICAL FLASHLIGHT HOLDER ELZETTA DES 859 - 707 -7471 KY 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/09/09 $653.14 RIFLE LIGHTS LUMAFORCE.COM 626- 524 -3690 CA 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/09/16 $213.79 NEGOTIATOR TRAINING D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1400.6104 JEFF LONG 2010/09/20 $147.99 TONER CARTRIDGES BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6160 JEFF LONG 2010/09/23 $444.05 GUN PARTS BROWNELLS INC 641- 6235401 IA 1400.6104 Page 1 $10,087.46 Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polirries and proceduresAe s `� Finance ectpr City Manager CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 8/26/10- 9/27/10 Card Holder lerchar Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code DEB MANGEN 2010/09/20 $372.91 APPLIANCE REPAIR D & T APPLIANCE SERV 952 - 9345522 MN 1551.6180 DEB MANGEN 2010/09/21 $141.68 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/30 $106.41 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/31 $48.00 VARIANCE CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/31 $48.00 VARIANCE CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/31 $48.00 VARIANCE CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/08/31 $48.00 VARIANCE CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/01 $60.00 HEALTH WORKSHOP PAYPAL *MNAPA 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1490.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/07 $141.15 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/07 $24.21 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/09 $89.00 HEALTH DEPT SUPPLIES THERMOWORKS INC 801 - 756 -7705 UT 1490.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/15 $62.37 TV MOUNT FOR EXEC COURSE MONOPRICE COM 909 - 989 -6887 CA 5424.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/15 $60.22 TV MOUNT FOR PRO SHOP MONOPRICE COM 909 - 989 -6887 CA 5410.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/22 $226.58 GFOA CONFERENCE ARROWWOOD RESORT & CALEXANDRIA MN 1160.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2010/09/24 $339.87 GFOA CONFERENCE ARROWWOOD RESORT & CALEXANDRIA MN 1160.6104 $10,087.46 Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polirries and proceduresAe s `� Finance ectpr City Manager 'w9tN�11'� o4 e1�11� •lam u • \fie REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. DEBRA MANGEN F-1 Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: OCTOBER 19, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. October 4, 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland, OCT 4 C�1G My name is Linda Kuntz and we lived at 6725 Cahill Road for many years. I am writing to you because I read the article in the Trib regarding the proposed path of the Bike Trail behind the house — to be built on a raised boardwalk. My concern is that the creek can rise quickly and develop a very dangerous current. Recent floods in southern MN developed the same situation —a little creek can turn into a flooded river in no time. If this plan is used, there must be a high, safe fence along the trail —similar to what is over the Crosstown. A railing will only invite inquisitive kids to crawl over or under it to explore. There are deep holes in the terrain, which could be deep enough for a child to drown. Please use the above precautions when designing the trail. Thank you. Sincerely, inda Kuntz — 9419 Clubhous — Eden Prairie 55347 Phone 952 - 941 -8965 0 Jane Timm From: Claire Bleser < cbleser @ninemilecreek.org> Sent: Monday, October 11, 201010:54 AM To: Jane Timm Subject: Reminder: NEMO Workshop - Nov 8th J Follow Up Flag: Follow up OCT j Flag Status: Flagged Hi Jane, Could you please forward this email to City Council, EEC, Park Board, Planning Commission, and Transportation Commission. Thanks! - Claire Dear City Council and Commissioners, As you might be aware, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in partnership with the City of Edina are hosting a Non -point source Education for Municipal Officials (NEMO) workshop focusing on keeping our waters healthy in Edina. The workshop will identify the various water and natural resources in Edina and at the same time explore techniques and Best Management Practices that help protect our water resources now and for future generations. The workshop is on Monday, November 8, 2010 from 5:30pm to 7:00pm at Council Chambers in the City of Edina City Hall. Please RSVP by October 25,2010 to: Claire Bleser at 952 - 358 -2276 or via email at cbleser@ninemilecreek.org. I look forward to seeing you there. Sincerely, Claire Bleser Claire Bleser Education and Outreach Coordinator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 7710 Computer Ave, Suite 135 Edina, MN 55435 Tel: (952) 358 -2276 Fax: (952) 835 -2079 www.ninemilecreek.org �.r 9��Mile eireelc �'� � Y -:.w' �,I Y4'r, „c�tih:n hA = ra1;GL ;•�.r�1 1 Mayor James B. Hovland Esq. Krause & Hovland Chartered 310 Groveland Ave. Minneapolis MN. 55403 City Council Members City of Edina 4801 W. 5e Street Edina MN. 55424 October 12, 2010 Re: Bike Trail Section 3 Dear Mayor and Council Members, OCT 13 My name is William K. Rose. I am 84 years old. I live at 6119 Habitat Ct. S. Edina. have lived there for 22 years. I lived there with my wife June until she died in April, 2008. My wife loved to garden. About 20 years ago, we built a garden near the rear of our property. June spent nearly every day possible in that garden. When she died, my children spread her ashes in the garden. When I die my kids will ashes spread my ashes there too. I understand that if the bike trail is built on section 3, it will destroy our garden. Please do not build the bike trail on section 3 Sincerely, William K. Rose Tom Horwath To: Peyton Robb Cc: Jim Hovland Subject: Sidewalk/Vegetation concerns To: Mr. Peyton Robb OCT 4812 Valley View Rd. From: Thomas Horwath Edina City Forester Dear Mr. Robb I was happy to meet with you Mon, Oct. 11 at your home to review and discuss the sidewalk construction taking place next year and the potential effects such construction may have on your existing trees bordering the area where such construction will take place. You showed me the areas of proposed excavations and I left with a relatively good grasp of the amount and proximity of such construction, as well as an inspection of the existing trees — species, approximate ages, sizes and observable health status. As I mentioned to you on site, the predictable responses of the trees during and after construction can fluctuate a great deal, I will still offer you my professional opinions and suggestions. From my previous observations of similar construction activities — sidewalks in particular, I have witnessed such low observable harmful effects to trees in situations such as yours. Excavation depths required for sidewalk construction are generally shallow and thus root loss is minimal. I counted eight Spruce trees on your border which are very close to the proposed excavation limits. Some arf closer than others and the sizes differed, though, as you informed me they were all close to the same age. I suspect th, the smaller ones are somewhat less healthy and may be more susceptible to any problems created by construction. The healthier trees can, of course, recover better after construction is complete. It is my opinion that some of these trees will be impacted more than others. I suggest you plan for replacement of some of them, but not all. I recommend, to achieve an even better desired screen from future sidewalk and street use that several well chosen varieties of low growing evergreens -could be planted between the existing Spruce trees. If any of the trees suffer to much health problems, this proactive approach would remediate such problems in the future. As for the large Silver Maple along this line, I would have concerns about the health and public safety risk it may pose after going through the amount of root severance that may have to be necessary by the construction proposals you were made aware of, and informed me of. The age and observable health conditions I witnessed, and the proximity to the sidewalk has led me to this advice. I hope this helps. If you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike Trail RECEIVED OCT 12 2010 Dear Sirs: Please forward this letter to the Edina City Council members and the Edina Park Board. I live in Minnesota in the summer time. I have been reading about the proposed Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail. I understand that in order to build the trail over the wetlands that you will have to give valuable land away to the Park District and spend 35 million dollars of Federal, State, and local monies. I am opposed to spending my tax dollars to build a recreational bike trail that will destroy valuable wetlands. The presence of wetlands within the city is a gift not to be taken lightly. I hope you will do the responsible thing and not let this project proceed. Yours Truly, R.Fred Gregory. Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Tuesday, October 12, 2010 8:49 AM REC ENV ED To: Cary Teague Cc: > Susan Howl � Subject: FW: Shelter Corp OCT This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: Lynn Hagedorn [mai Ito: hagedornla @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 8:33 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corp Please add our names to the other tax payers who do not care to contribute to the Shelter Corp /Colonial Church business bottom line - Vote no to the Park Dedication waiver and the Tiff request. Lynn Hagedorn and Charly Zajicek 5808 Creek Valley Road Susan Howl Stephen H. Brown, CCIM Edina Planning Commission 952 - 837 -8517 (w) 612 - 805 -2232 (cell) RECEIVED OCT 1 1 2010 I have reviewed the information that has been submitted by Ms. Hoganson. While 1 am uncertain as to whether this is an issue about the information that 1 presented earlier, or my position as it relates to Neighborhood Associations from the League of Women Voter's, my position on both remains unchanged. Based upon the data that Ms. Hoganson provided in her document today, 1 have provided additional data that will amplify my earlier findings. As background, in the document that 1 provided at the Planning Commission meeting, and which was forwarded to Council (attached) the following data and findings were taken directly from Ms. Hoganson's Petition, something 1 clearly inquired about in detail our Planning Commission meeting. My position then, as it would be in any project evaluation, is that if a significant number of people have a similar opinion, I want to understand it, and factor it into my decision making. To summarize my initial findings, 1 took the information from the survey provided by Ms. Hoganson at the time. I felt the geography in that sample was too broad, and chose to focus on the neighborhood directly adjacent to the subject property. Based upon the information she provided, using information from Hennepin County, this is the summary: • 85 signatures from the area identified in Red. • Those 85 signatures, came from 64 households in the indetified area. • There are 932 residential parcels in the identified market area in red. • Using 64 households and 932 residential parcels, that equates to 6.87% opposed. • If you want to use the 85 signatures (which would be inaccurate) it would still equate to only 9.12% opposed. This would be an innaccurote approach because if you want to evaluate the number of residents, you would need to account for multiple people at each address, which could easily double the 932 households to reflect multiple adults living at each dwelling. Doing so, and using a 2X factor, there would be approximately 1864 potential residents in the trade area, which would only further dilute the percentage of opposed to approximately 4.56 %. Attached in Ms. Hoganson's information, is a map where she has chosen to use a larger geographic area to incorporate the entire number of people opposed. This is a larger geography than the one i focused on at the Planning Commission meeting. I warned, that in using the larger geographic area, my analysis and finding would only be magnified. 1 have attached a revised map that incorporates the 285 unique households provided by Ms. Hoganson. 1 have created a "custom boundary" around these 285 households to create the revised market area that i believe Ms. Hoagnason is indicating represents the neighborhood. Using this revised map, 1 have removed all non - residential parcels from the market area, and have included only the residential parcels in the revised trade area. Doing so, the following is a summary of those findings: • 285 signatures from the revised area (see map) • 13,515 residential parcels • Using 285 households and 13,516 residnetial parcels, that equates to 2.11 % of the people in this trade area are opposed. • (Technically, I do not believe the percentage is even 2.11% because I believe the 285 signatures from the petition includes multiple signatures from certain addresses. I did not have that information from Ms. Hoagnson to verify, but that was the way it was in the original information. Therefore, this represents the highest possible percentage of those opposed because it gives additional weighting where it technically should not. If you were use the 2X factor, like was outlined above, the percentage drops to just 1.05 %. As a point of cross validation to the numbers that I used in my assessment, the United States Postal Service indicated that, as of June 2010, there are 14,518 residential addresses in an area that is almost identical to the custom boundary I created using Ms. Hoganson's data (see attached map). Technically, the USPS trade area which is used is actually smaller than the area i have used for the custom boundary based upon Ms. Hoganson's information, which would indicate there are actually more residnetial addresses parcels than I used in these numbers. If this is the case, which I believe that it likely is, it would only dilute the percentages further. Fellow Commissioners and City Council members, my purpose in conducting this exercise was to validate objectively the information provided by the neighborhood itself, to support their claims. This exercise was conducted to assess if a large percentage of the people felt similarly, one way or the other. It was a tool for me to help cut through the emotions of the debate between the parties. It was simply one component of the information I used to make my decision, which was very helpful for me. I would point out that I have not received any calls or inquiries from Ms. Hoaganson regarding the data I provided, nor have i received any calls from anyone from the "neighborhood" to discuss it. I met with them to discuss and understand there concerns about the project after the preliminary approvals by the PC and CC, and have heard nothing from them since. I am happy to discuss the information I have provided with anyone, staff, CC or neighborhood. But I stand behind the information i provided then and today, as well as what it represents related to this particualr project. As for my position on Neighborhood Associations, I will simply add that Ms. Hoagnson is correct in offering that i do not believe in making Neighborhood Associations a formal part of our city process. i believe they are an invaluable way to create community from a social and neighborhood awareness perspective. However, in my o inion this project is a clear example of why they do not work. Respectfully, Steve From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunno @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:48 AM To: Arlene Forrest; Floyd Grabiel; Jeffrey Carpenter; Julie Risser; Karwehn Kata; Kevin Staunton; Michael Fischer; Michael Schroeder; Nancy N. Scherer; Steve Brown Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please Correct Record: 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS, NOT 64, OR 4.45 TIMES MORE THAN WAS REPORTED, 23.5% GREATER THAN THE 7% REPORTED Importance: High -lello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and also to the Planning Commission members. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.cityofedina.com From: Barbara Hoganson [mailto:barbarahoganson @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:04 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please Correct Record: 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS, NOT 64, OR 4.45 TIMES MORE THAN WAS REPORTED, 23.5% GREATER THAN THE 7% REPORTED Importance: High Please delete the previous email from Sun 10/3/2010 8:21 PM on the same subject and replace it with this one. Please forward this email onto Commissioner Brown, Other Planning Commissioners, Mayor and City Council Members. Thank you. Respectfully, for the record, and since this project is still in process with Park Dedication, TIFF, NMWSD, residents are still concerned with the misunderstanding stemming back to Commissioner Brown's Map, coupled with the concluding remarks made at the end of public comment section at the June 30, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting re Shelter Corp /Colonial Church Project, and again, these remarks resurfaced again when Commissioner Brown was asked about what he thought about Neighborhood Assns, at the League of Women Voters Forum; thought it may be helpful to provide additional support of the Concerned Residents Opposed to the Proposed Project. As mentioned above, this project is still in process with the Park Dedication Fee waiver being requested, TIFF Money requests, and it has to get approval from the Nine Mile Watershed District and we want to make sure we do our part to present facts accurately, and hope we can all be operating from the same facts. We would like to show you that there is support for 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS, or 4.45 times higher the number reported. We were committed to be thoughtful and respectful and were not trying to misrepresent the support of Concerned Residents in anyway. I am sure you can understand how remarks that were made could be construed as offensive to all the hard work of many concerned citizens. We also understand the binder had a lot of information to plow through and it may be difficult to sort it all out. Most of us have full time jobs and we can only spend so much time on these things. Thank you for taking the time to review our information below. Also, if you have any other ideas that you think would make our efforts more productive now and in the future, please let us know. As an easypoint of reference, please find the two links with the video spots indicated to support the map and remarks we are responding too. 1.Planning Commission June 30, 2010: http://Edina.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view id =3 &clip id =1001, (spot on video 6:01:14), Commissioner Brown references, "932 households are impacted in this area, represented in the red area (on the first attachment map), 85 signed petitions, representing 64 households, or 7% of the neighborhood. Then Mr. Brown had remarks that appeared to indicate that we were misrepresenting the support. The concerned residents of the Neighborhood Group, their attorney had ever seen the map, and were not able to comment on the map since it was presented after the public comment section. 2. MN League of Women's Voters: http://edina.granicus.com/MediaPiaver.php?view id =3 &clip id= 1052 &publish id= &event id= (spot on video 50.57) And more recently, Commissioner Brown's video taping at the League of Women Voters where he states, doesn't support Neighborhood Assns. "had recent experience where people represented that they were the neighborhood, but after research and investigation found out they were not" Our "group" represent the the single family home owner residents who received state required notice within 1,000 ft, and people beyond 1,000 ft that are concerned. We are not part of any Neighborhood Assn, nor have any plans to become one. We were opposed to the proposed project for comp plan reasons, zoning laws, and we consider the process to be unfair. The impacted neigbhors were given 20 days notice from 12.8.09 and the development application was submitted 12.28.09, when our City Staff was working with the Developer and Church some 18 months or so longer. On a $40 million project, this is just not realistic for a neighborhood or any other group to vet this size of a project in this short time frame. CORRECTION: THERE WERE 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS AND NOT 64, OR 4.45 TIMES MORE THAN WAS REPORTED, or 30.5% vs the 7 % reported. Would this info have made any difference? EXPLANATION: You can see the snapshot of the maps below, or a larger version in the 1st ATTACHMENT OF COMMISSIONER BROWN'S MAP Labeled EDINA COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP ELECTRONIC PETITIONS. It appears Mr. Brown may have picked this information out of the Binder from only one section. We don't know how these numbers were determined as there were 116 responses in the Binder under the Electronic Petition Section, but understand there may some people from the same household, and others may be outside of the "red" area. As it says in the binder, these electronic petitions were taken 3 days prior to give a sense of people were currently weighing and were never intended to imply that this was the listing of all the unique households opposed to this project. The supporting information to substantiate the unique households of Concerned Residents of the Countryside Neighborhood Group are indicated below. Residents like to provide their support in different ways and that is why different modes of support were made available. We had electronic petitions, manual petitions, yard signs, website forms, and financial contributors. As a result of all of these methods of support, we have over 285 UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT. The unique households from all these methods were inputted into the Microsoft Map program as represented in attachment 2. The information came from the information included in the binders provided to each Planning Commission Member and City Council. And the listings were emailed to each of you too. 1. We are not or never claimed to be a Neighborhood Association. We never discussed being a neighborhood association. We were solely concerned single family home owners that received state required notice a's required by State Law within 1,000 feet. There were 161 single family households that received notice, the majority of which are opposed to the proposed Shelter /Colonial Project. There are other people beyond 1,000 feet that also are opposed. 2. p7 - p72 Electronic Petitions - there were 116 responses, and to date we have 154 UNIQUE Households from this mode. 4 3.- p145 - p154 Yard Signs.- Kevin and Anne McCoy summarized this report and their compiled the list of 184 households, and 64 signs were not tracked per se. You all received emails from Kevin and Anne McCoy a few days before.June 30, 2010, and copies of these were also include in the binder for your review. 4. p155 - p184 Manual Petitions. Kevin and Anne McCoy also sent you all an email, and the supporting documents were again copied and included in the binder for your review in. Not everyone has computers so this method was still important. 5. Website forms and financial contributors, provided by Christine Henninger were also included in the summary count of unique households. 6. Some people were involved in multiple modes, however,.we summarized the UNIQUE HOUSEHOLDS and they TOTAL 285 HOUSEHOLDS. 7. There were additional households that when learned more what was happening, were opposed to the project as proposed. The represent people outside the 1,000 feet, because they are concerned with traffic, park usage, infrastructure impacts, zoning precedent and comp plan issues. Here are some visual snapshots of the attachments. See larger versions in the attachments. COMMISSIONER BROWN'S MAP HE SAYS HAS 64 HOUSEHOLDS Mr. BROWN'S . LEGEND Concerned Residents of COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD MAP OF 285 HOUSEHOLDS . 5 .'� y s .r ' rh ..," y 49 ; N! �j Jr4 yIn '. f rT �YUrt Vl �3 � rt, • ,r }T� •, t iv ceur fi There are many lessons learned that we are willing to help in anyway to help things work better. Please call. upon us if we may be of further assistance. Thank you for taking the time to read through the information and consideration of changing the record as you deem appropriate. Thank you for your all that you do for our City! Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place 952 - 926 -1763 6 s: t •x i ?gin. 2• Sitjj�„'L715dt8+J'it:W i e'er., �nT.t�O tea ri 'VTCrb Y sn F3t.4 its (,t qd l'1 X41. & tSE Ot 1' ,,gyp y • a � 7 .'� y s .r ' rh ..," y 49 ; N! �j Jr4 yIn '. f rT �YUrt Vl �3 � rt, • ,r }T� •, t iv ceur fi There are many lessons learned that we are willing to help in anyway to help things work better. Please call. upon us if we may be of further assistance. Thank you for taking the time to read through the information and consideration of changing the record as you deem appropriate. Thank you for your all that you do for our City! Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place 952 - 926 -1763 6 s: t •x i ?gin. {� � ' 'Y �nT.t�O tea ri 'VTCrb Y sn F3t.4 91, & tSE . M1 S r °'fie 7�'l � t ►ter �ss..�t,.rW.y� /f�x4G1h ul lI (fi�/�. � e .'� y s .r ' rh ..," y 49 ; N! �j Jr4 yIn '. f rT �YUrt Vl �3 � rt, • ,r }T� •, t iv ceur fi There are many lessons learned that we are willing to help in anyway to help things work better. Please call. upon us if we may be of further assistance. Thank you for taking the time to read through the information and consideration of changing the record as you deem appropriate. Thank you for your all that you do for our City! Barbara Hoganson 5829 Jeff Place 952 - 926 -1763 6 RECEIVED October 10, 2010 OCT 1 1 2010 Edina City Council Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scott Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Edina Park Board Todd Fronek, Jennifer Kenney, Joseph Hulbert, Bill Lough, Keeya Steel, Randy Meyer, Ellen Jones, Daniel Peterson, Rob Presthus, Louise Segreto Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members and Park Board Members: We are writing to express our continued strong objection to the proposed section 9 routing of the regional bike trail between Nine Mile Creek and our homes. This particular routing would be devastating to our privacy, the peaceful enjoyment of our properties, and our property values. We have many objections to this route, but these are some of the more significant: 1) Loss of Privacy and Peaceful Enioyment of our Properties: Our street, Valley Lane, has become a busy thoroughfare between the High School and the Southdale Shopping district. In addition, we have a public sidewalk in front of our homes that has become one of the most popular walking and jogging routes in the city. The addition of a public regional trail immediately behind our homes would turn our homes into virtual "Fish Bowls ...... homes without privacy. We understand why paths through natural areas are popular. But, trails that are mere feet from backyard decks and swingsets are uncomfortable for both the homeowner and the trail user. 2) A Massive Boardwalk is Required: Due to the wetland, a trail in back of our homes would require the construction of an elevated boardwalk. Imagine the near continuous noise of bicycles and pedestrians on the boardwalk from dawn to sundown. Further, despite assurances to the contrary by Joni Bennett and Kelly Grissman when they walked the route with us, the structure is being proposed not near the creek, but adjacent to our property lines, less than 12 yards from our decks and patios. It will be easier for a trail user to see inside our homes than to see the creek! The structure would virtually cut us off from the creek, both visually and physically. A picture is attached of the structure that would be built. 3) Loss of Property Values: We estimate that our homes will suffer a loss in property value of approximately $100,000 each if section 9 is adopted and built. Experts agree. Attached please find our comment letter to 3RPD that outlines the details. This financial sacrifice is much too great for our families. 4) Safety and Security of the Neighborhood: Our children have been raised with the understanding they could not play in the front yard unaccompanied by an adult due to the busy thoroughfare street and busy public sidewalk (Valley Lane). For the past 45 years, the backyards in our neighborhood have provided a safe, secure area for our years, the backyards in our neighborhood have provided a safe, secure area for our children..... separate and private from the busy car and pedestrian traffic in the front. Most parents never allow young children to play in parks unattended regardless of how safe the area is. A section 9 routing would force us to have the same concerns about our own backyards. 5) Habitat and Wetland Destruction: Most of Nine Mile Creek has remained one of the last undeveloped natural areas in Edina. Despite its narrow swath, most adjacent landowners have left the creek banks wild in order to enjoy the beauty of the habitat and the wildlife it supports. Bulldozing a 16 foot wide road, and /or constructing massive boardwalks would essentially eliminate much of this last undeveloped wetland and wildlife habitat in Edina. Our city will lose a true gem. 6) Many Good Alternatives Exist- The maps produced by 3RPD indicate that there are route alternatives that do not so negatively impact homeowners and neighborhoods. Further, we believe that there are other alternatives that weren't considered at all. (Throughout this process, we, the public, were never given the opportunity to propose routes. We have been restricted to commenting on routes proposed by 3RPD.) Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of our objections. We are confident that your careful consideration will result in alternative routing of the bike trail and prevent the devastation of our neighborhood. Sincerely, — 1 Lam'' G�'7`"%"'�-'^ --�` ..._• ! L' � `�� R..' v t� ' � d David & Tami Thompson Paul & Constance Ratelle Chad & ndrea Sc'hZing ati mmer 5517 Valley Lane 5521 Valley Lane 5513 Valley Lane Edina, MN 55439 Edina, MN 55439 Edina, MN 55439 5,517 Valley Lane Edina, MN 55439 (952) 942 -3384 DAVID & 6 AM1 'THOMPSON E -mail: thompson_davidj @yahoo.com July 5, 2010 ** COPY ** Three Rivers Park District Attn: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail 3000 Xenium Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 Subject: Response to Nine Mile Creek Trail EAW Regarding Property Values Dear Three Rivers Park District: We appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the "Environment, Social, Technical, and Economic Assessment" that was prepared and presented on the proposed Nine Mile Creek Trail. We noted that the report included no discussion on the impact that the trail will have on property values of adjacent properties. We believe that this is a glaring omission and should be addressed before route selection is determined. While not all adjacent properties may be negatively impacted, we believe that there.are many residents along the trail who will suffer significant loss in property value if a trail is routed between their private back yards and the creek. To support our contention that property values will be negatively affected and should be studied_ before going forward, we offer the following: 1. Residents at 5513, 5517, and 5521 Valley Lane invited Mr. Tom Ries, from Edina Realty to visit their properties, review the published alignment of segment 9, and offer an expert opinion on the effect that this'route would have on the market values of the properties. Mr. Ries is a 35 year real estate veteran, specializes in Edina residential properties, and has no personal stake in any particular alignment of the trail. Mr. Ries expert opinion is that a segment 9 alignment would have "significant negative impact to market value" of these properties. He estimates the effect to be at least $50,000 per property and perhaps much more if a boardwalk structure is constructed. 2. Presently, Edina appraises and taxes creek -side residential properties as "waterfront" properties. These properties are valued and taxed at a higher level than comparable non - waterfront properties. It stands to reason that separating these properties from the waterfront amenity by a regional trail and necessary privacy screening would transform these properties from waterfront properties to non - waterfront properties and result in reduced valuation and taxation. This would especially be true for those residents whose access to, and view of the creek would be completely eliminated by the proposed elevated boardwalk. 3. Published studies of the effects of trails on property values offer varied and /or inconclusive results. However, in a 2003 study, Effects of Off - Street Bike Trails on Home Values in Hennepin County Minnesota by Jennifer Shilcox, the data is clear that destruction of adjacent open space for the purposes of creating off - street bike trails is destructive to property values. While the study suggests that off- street bike trails would only likely reduce the value of adjacent properties, it shows definitively that the destruction of open space for the purpose of off - street trails would certainly destroy value. Routing the Nine -Mile Trail through the narrow band of wetland would indeed destroy the open space and property values in many neighborhoods. We believe that it is in the best interest of TRPD, The City of Edina, and affected property owners for TRPD to commission a professional and independent inverse condemnation appraisal before a route is selected. The present economic assessment is incomplete without a more thorough understanding of the costs to property owners and a plan to compensate them where necessary. A $20 to $25 million project, seven miles in length, and adjoining hundreds of private properties deserves this type of study and evaluation. Sincerely, David Thompson Tami Thompson ➢� Mai s J-1 . ,. ...•titer . Y {�._ Susan Howl From: Kaylin Martin Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 9:45 AM RE CE. IVED To: 'Kathy Dahlheimer Cc: Susan Howl Subject: RE: Shelter Corp and tax issues OCT 1 12010 Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. Your message was forwarded upon receipt to members of the Edina City Council. If I can be of additional assistance, please contact me. Kaylin Martin Crime Prevention Coordinator Edina Police Department 952 - 833 -9523 www.CityofEdina.com /Police From: Kathy Dahlheimer [ mailto:kdahlheimer @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 7:45 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Shelter Corp and tax issues I would like to express my opinion that this for profit company needs to pay all taxes relevant to the project they propose ie Waters and should not get TIF status. Thank you. Kathleen Dahlheimer 4801 West 60th Street Edina Mn. 55424 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Park Board meeting to address regional bike trail Wachments: Alternative route for proposed regional bike path RECEIVED OCT 11 1010 From: Bob Lubar [mailto:rlubar @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 12:45 PM To: Lynette Biunno; John Keprios; Joseph. Hulbert@morganstanleysmithbarney.com; tfronek @yahoo.com Cc: 'Housh, Scot'; 'Mary Brindle' Subject: Edina Park Board meeting to address regional bike trail To: Edina Park Board CC: Edina Mayor and City Council Regarding: Proposed regional bike trail in Edina. I am writing this letter as the CAT member elected to represent the people along segment 2 of the proposed Edina Regional Bike Trail. The Mayor /City Council has requested that the Park Board provide a recommendation on this topic. My concern is that several issues have not yet been adequately addressed. Below are those issues in outline form. I trust they will be part of the conversation at the meeting on Tuesday evening. Economics — stated construction costs = $17 to $20 million plus $185,000 annual maintenance which generates a NPV cost of $23MM to $26MM (excluding undisclosed indirect costs). a. Cost is huge to build and maintain 7 miles of trail. i. What are the potential consequences if Three Rivers Park District defaults after the construction is complete. 1. Consequences could include TRPD coming back to its tax base (suburban Hennepin County) and threatening to shut down all the parks unless the tax levy is increased. 2. TRPD has already reduced staffing costs. It is not clear how TRPD will generate the funds to pay debt service and operating expenses associated with multiple projects over the long term. b. Sources and amounts of construction financing (debt and grant amounts by $ and source) have not been made clear. c. Indirect expenses of running the operation have not been disclosed. d. Is proceeding with this project consistent with Edina's priorities? i. How about during a recession when the long term expectation for property values is either flat or declining? ii. Is there a more cost effective way to serve the needs of the community? Impact on nature and character of neighborhood due to increased access and parking from trail users a. Danger to kids and elderly due to increased vehicle traffic near Walnut Ridge Park. b. Increased vehicle traffic on currently quiet streets. Changes to the nature and use of Walnut Ridge Park. a. Safety concerns for the park's existing users and its neighbors. b. Trail passes within 20 feet of tennis courts, children's play areas and Lacrosse fields. i. Option across the southern portion of the park will pass adjacent to the warming house and restrooms creating a different safety hazard. 4. Parking issues for neighborhood surrounding Walnut Ridge park. 5. Wisdom of providing a long term easement of Edina park and natural areas to a 3rd party. 6. Policing /security issues — who pays and what level of service will be provided? a. Hopkins is paying for police activity on their portion of the route. b. What is Edina's plan and how much will that.cost? 7. Elevated platform or bridges across wetlands a. Impact on risk of flooding to the area i. Raised boardwalk is planned to be built parallel to flow of creek ii. Does TRPD have experience building a raised platform trail, in a flood way that runs parallel to the flow of water? 1. 1 would like to see the engineering analysis on this topic. b. Collection of debris caught by platform and supporting structure — how will it be handled? c. What materials will be used in constructing the platform i. If Edina plans to plow in the winter — will it hold up to regular plowing? 1. Any additional maintenance or capital needs to the city as a result? ii. What is the-impact of chemicals used to de -ice on the wetlands and its habitat? iii. What is the impact of using chemically treated lumber (or other product) on the wetlands and its habitat? d. Visual impact of a 10' to 12'. high bridge — will it be aesthetically pleasing to existing neighbors. . i. How will an elevated trail change level of privacy to homeowners? e. Noise generated by traveling across a.timber trail. i. Please provide estimated decibel readings on asphalt vs. proposed elevated surface. 8. Property value impact to citizens adjacent to the park vs. a few blocks away. 9. Refusal to date to consider alternative routes a. 3 alternative routes (that I know of) have been submitted. i. What is the status of the alternative proposals? ii. Attached is another copy of the alternative that I forwarded to the Mayor /City Council b. I would like to re -open the idea of building along the west side of Lincoln drive (segment 3). i. This action will keep the existing sidewalk on the east side of the street for the residents ii. It will eliminate at least 4 street crossings making it a safer option than the current one for segment 3. iii. No residential property exists on that side of the road. iv. TRPD deleted this option without reviewing the potential right of way issues with MNDOT. 1. 1 believe that curbs and gutters could be moved to accommodate user and MNDOT needs. Feel free to call if you have questions or need. additional information. Regards, Bob Lubar Robert N. Lubar Phone: 612- 396 -3285 Fax: 866 -521 -6018 Email: rlubar @comcast.net 2 C) W � 3 16GA ' Oak Be LAKE UA^ : Proposed location of Light f Cm LA O c r,T l 00 ,� C . l4 l tow w. ��� ®M14trK ff` d A" ' �♦ *WKW ' X k LONE r� LAKE ,� a ircle (one Lak t F! � pro.► vW TA to J � X i 169 �� � '`i � �� � ■liM C�Ot Mkt Irw�4 ' o I�NJtYiRYx► ClMOM jr � yy IMAKYIwY j�' 62 N tss fit lk� CrOlsk)iqn VY C Dr 212 -i 0 0 I CL AP loo -Z 0 15-1 , 14 Rd C, $N 970r. S! lbo P 02010 G -le Map data 02010 Gofole - k a C5 MaTth Rd < )169( `)2010 Google - Map data 02010 Google - 6 70th S. v 6 q Loch MOO, or ID CA& Jam" I B(aenlar *0 W 7ft St k a C5 MaTth Rd < )169( `)2010 Google - Map data 02010 Google - Susan Howl From: Bob Lubar [rlubar @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:41 PM To: Lynette Biunno; John Keprios RECOVER Cc: 'WESTERDAHL WILLIAM'; Chappy6420 @aol.com; FWCORRIGAN @MAC.COM Subject: Alternative route for proposed regional bike path T 1 2010 Attachments: proposed trail opus to braemar.pdf OCT To Mayor, City Council, and Park and Recreation Director: Attached is a copy of an alternative route for the proposed regional bike trail. This proposal was presented to Mayor Hovland on August 27, 2010 during a meeting with 3 Edina neighborhood residents. The route begins where the Hopkins trail segment ends. It proceeds through existing paved trails within the Opus area. This area is filled with existing trails that could be easily adapted for the intent of the trail (see attachment). It will also connect with the proposed light rail station. A definite plus for facilitating our mass transit objectives. The route proceeds along an existing tree lined boulevard within a small section of Eden Prairie. It proceeds along Flying Cloud Drive and Washington Ave providing workers with easy access by bikers. It will also provide increased visibility to these businesses. The trail continues through Braemar Park, providing users with easier access to recreation fields and other activities within the park. I was told by a Mary Brindle that the park is considered underutilized. This plan would help drive people to the park. Note that the route would impact far fewer households than the current proposal. This trails also stays clear of high maintenance and expensive development costs associated with building along a wetland. As I told Mayor Hovland on that date this plan has several advantages and a few disadvantages to the current proposal. Disavantages: 1. Route crosses 3 municipalities and would perhaps be more difficult to coordinate. Advantages: 1. Connects with the proposed light rail station in the Opus Center. a. Supports the mass transportation plan objectives 2. Helps commuter and recreational bikers by pushing bike traffic through business districts within Minnetonka, Edina, and Eden Prairie. a. Increase access and visibility to the services offered by these local businesses. 3. Construction costs will be significantly less expensive because a. It is based on an existing trail system (the trail already exists in many areas) b. It avoids costly elevated bridges currently planned through the wetlands. 4. Less impact on residential housing while continuing to provide an East /West trail. 5. Offers scenic and recreational advantages at a lower cost and impact on residents. 6. Increases use of and traffic to an underutilized resource -- Braemar Park Of course my proposal needs to be further vetted. But it clearly offers a superior alternative to the current proposal. Feel free to contact me if you have questions or need additional information. Regards, Bob Lubar Robert N. Lubar Phone: 612 - 396 -3285 Fax: 866 - 521 -6018 Email: rlubaracomcast.net Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter Corp.Maters Project RECEIVED OCT 11 12010 From: FranzSr @aol.com [mailto:FranzSr @ aol.com] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 12:41 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corp. /Waters Project Edina City Council: Please vote NO on Shelter's request for an easement waiver. Shelter /Colonial should pay the entire Park Dedication Fee. This entire project is an attempt to save a financially floundering Colonial Church and a development company seeking Federal funds(our tax dollars) to erect a massive structure providing no benefits to anyone other than Shelter. We elected you folks to the Edina City Council, not because of your political affiliation, but for our belief in your ability to reason and apply common sense in decisions on projects which will benefit all Edina residents. Shelter's Tiff request for a 200,000.00 tax rebate is further proof of the mess this proposed project has created. Shelter /Colonial is grasping at straws. They deserve no exceptions. Joanie Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Edina, MN 952 920 1529 RECEWED- OCT 112010 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor, City of Edina Edina City Offices 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Ms. Joni Bennett Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Ms. Mary Brindle Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: 5700 Tucker Lane Edina, Minnesota 55436 952- 930 -9040 October 5, 2010 Mr. Scot Housh Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Ms. Ann Swenson Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 A "thought while shaving" regarding the proposed bike trail: painting lanes for biking on Lincoln Drive and Vernon Avenue and other Edina streets which would provide a route to the already- constructed trail in the Southdale area would not cost $17 million. Using sidewalks and adjacent property to construct a 16- foot -wide trail would. The latter is exactly what the Park District proposes to do in Segment 3. Sighted on a replica of an outdoor mailbox near Waterford Court in Segment 3: "Save Our Sidewalk." Very truly yours, Richard C. Johnson CAT Representative for Segment 1 RCJ /tlt Susan Howl RECEIVED OCT 11 From: Jim Beer [mailto:jbeer5804 @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 2:49 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Shelter Corp /Easement To the Edina City Council: A decision has been made to allow a large corporation,utilizing a non - profit church to build in my neighborhood. I would ask that no tax allowance or easement be allowed for this business. It is my hope that this endeavor is recognized as a business venture at this time, not a real asset to the community until it has been proven that we needed an expensive senior citizen facility. I hope it will be filled up. This move is another strategy that a large company utilizes to get what they need to enhance their profits. It is apart of a rote script and they are a bit more sophisticated in their presentations then always realized. The tax money may be needed to improve traffic areas. It is my belief that the location is the marketing asset, and now they do not want to pay the benefits of a park, or the city that has chosen to use it's name to attract renters. Please, do not vote for more favors for Colonial or Shelter Corp. Elizabeth Beer i Susan Howl From: Kaylin Martin Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 9:48 AM RECEIVED To: 'David Davison' Cc: Susan Howl Subject: RE: Increased Rail Freight through Edina OCT 112010 Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. Your message was forwarded upon receipt to members of the Edina City Council. If I can be of additional assistance, please contact me. Kaylin Martin Crime Prevention Coordinator Edina Police Department 952 - 833 -9523 www.CitvofEdina.com /Police - - - -- Original Message---- - From: David Davison [mailto:dd01 @annben.us] Sent: Sunday; October 10, 2010 5:51 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Increased Rail Freight through Edina The following site contemplates rerouting of freight to the "MN &S line in St. Louis Park ". This rail line also runs through Edina, for example, close to City Hall and 70th and Cahill. http: / /www.mnsrailstudy.org/ Rerouting of freight through Edina should be of concern of the city, yet the site makes no mention of Edina as an interested party. I am also concerned about the impact of a commitment to increased heavy rail traffic along the MN &S line on the prospects for light rail along the route. David Davison 6716 Galway Drive Edina 55439 944 -7549 1 Susan Howl Subject: RE: Edina Fire & Rescue Complaint Mr. Olson, I will look into this and get back to you as soon as possible. I appreciate you bring this to our attention, Marty Scheerer Marty Scheerer Fire Chief RECENED Edina Fire Department 952 - 826 -0332 OCT - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Duane Olson [mailto:olsondu @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 7:21 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Edina Fire & Rescue Complaint To: Fire Chief: Marty Scheerer Training & Safety Chief and Special Operations Team Leader: Tom Schmitz Mayor: James Hovland Council Member: Joni Bennett Council Member: Mary Brindle Council Member: Scot Housh Council Member: Ann Swenson This morning at 4:36 AM I initiated an emergency call to 911 after I found my domestic partner (Michael A. Montano) unconscious on the bathroom floor bleeding from his head. My immediate attempts to wake him failed. Once he did wake up he was experiencing blurred speech and was extremely weak as he could not move at all. Upon arrival of the responders he was speaking more clearly, but was still weak and unable to move. He told the responders that he was weak and couldn't move, and that he was experiencing pain in his neck. The responders, primarily one who's name eludes me, kept telling him to get up, and then began prodding at him with his boot and telling him that he needed to get up because he wasn't going to do it for him. At*no point did they explore his complaint of the pain he was experiencing in his neck, nor did they bother to stabilize his neck. My partner has had neck surgery in the past and there was legitimate concern when he mentioned the pain in that region. The responders, all four of them, in my opinion, conducted themselves very unprofessionally and void of any compassion or human decency. What justification can be given for using a boot to prod at someone that was unconscious only moments ago and bleeding from his head? These individuals that responded placed my partner's health at further risk by both their actions and inaction to stabilize his neck. Furthermore, when they finally did accept the fact that he lacked the strength to get himself up off the floor, it was I, not the four of them, that had to help him up. I was left very upset and disappointed with city services when I arrived to the ER. I'd like this issue to be addressed in a timely manor and will be waiting for a response. Duane Olson 6309 York Ave South #203 Edina, MN 55435 612 - 850 -9254 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:25 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: (no subject) Hello there, This message is being forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno City of Edina Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 www.citvofedina.com From: Burrisjo @aol.com [mailto:Burrisjo @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:56 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: (no subject) To the village council: RECEIVED OCT 112010 I understand the Shelter Corp. is asking to be excused from taxes because they do not believe the occupants of their apartment, care facility will be using the park. I also do not use the park and would like to be exempt from that portion of my village taxes. I cannot believe the council would agree to their request as it will be a for profit business. Joanne Burris, Edina resident for 48 years Susan Howl Attachments: Kris Aaker 10- 6- 10.doc; City Council 9- 16- 10.doc RECEIVED importance: High PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENTS TO MAYOR HOVLAND. October 6, 2010 TO: The Honorable Mayor James Hovland FROM: Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino, Residents 4509 Garrison Lane; 952.926.4839 RE: Planning Commission OCT 1 1 1010 Thank you for your call last week regarding the message Connie left for you involving our extreme frustration with the City of Edina's Planning Commission and process. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf and also understand you need additional time to gather more information and facts before we meet to discuss our pending project. Meanwhile, we thought it might be helpful if you had some additional information. With this email we are attaching two documents: A letter we sent today to Kris Aaker requesting that she distribute it to the Planning Commission. We felt it necessary to send this letter because there has yet to be a determination if a work session is planned for next week AND we wanted to know when or if we can formally submit our objections to results of the last Planning Commission meeting on Sept. 29. We also thought it would only be fair to document our frustration directly with the Planning Commission since we have now contacted you for your help. A cover letter we sent to you and the City Council on Sept. 16 with supporting documents to be included in Council correspondence packets for your meeting on Sept. 21. Please let us know if you need us to resend the supporting documents that were included. We are disappointed that so far the intended process for solving problems is not working. We are not disappointed in the Planning Staff or City Council, but we simply do not understand why the Planning Commission seems intent on setting a tone of antagonism vs. cooperation. Perhaps we were too naive in the beginning when we actually thought there might be some cireater good to come out of our project's stall ... that, perhaps, there would be a solution at the ready for all former variance requests. To borrow one of your perfect phrases, "what tools would be added to the City's toolbox to fix these problems ?" Admittedly our primary reason for contacting you last week was the result of the Sept. 29 Planning Commission meeting. Among our objections and unpleasant take -aways from last week's meeting: We were insulted that the agenda only allowed us to comment on previously presented Commission agenda items. We were not able to comment after new language was introduced to a proposed new Conditional Use Permit (CUP) by Commissioner Schroeder and then discussed by the Commission. In our attached letter to Kris Aaker, you will find more detail on why we believe the proposed language is seriously flawed. We were appalled that Commissioner Grabiel believes that we and other residents have two choices: "Seek a variance or wait for the Legislature." He has taken this position on more than one occasion and we are baffled as to both his insistence and that no one has corrected him or objected, including the City Attorney during the last Planning Commission meeting. Perhaps we missed something ... is the City of Edina ignoring the Supreme Court ruling and processing variances? We were under the impression that the City Attorney has advised the City Council not to proceed due to the Krummenacher case and resulting Minnesota Supreme Court ruling. We remain appalled that a Planning Commissioner would be so bold as to suggest residents proceed, despite the legal ruling. • We were stunned that Commissioner Carpenter actually asked, "What would prevent (residents) from taking a garden hose and flooding their yard to create a ground water problem ?" REALLY? We'd like to know what has prompted this implication of distrust towards homeowners, residents and taxpayers? • We were offended that several commissioners said they didn't want to change the ordinance in question (Section H. Edina City Code 850.11) because it is "only for one case. " We had hoped they would recall or that planning staff would have reminded them —and as we had previously stated in earlier meetings —that there have been six variance requests issued for first floor height since the ordinance went into effect. More cases would most likely be in front of them, but when inquiries are made to the planning office, people are told that variance applications are on hold. • We are confused as to why the Planning Commission lacks respect for the role of the Planning staff. It is our understanding that the City employs highly trained staff and that permit applications go through technical reviews at several levels including planning, construction and engineering. Recently in an interview Commissioner Brown said "the city has a capable staff in charge of the enterprise businesses ... I believe we should let our city staff do their job," We wonder why the same respect given to those running "enterprise businesses" is not entrusted to Planning Department staff or even the City Attorney? • We are reminded that set -backs and zoning ordinances have been changed and amended for commercial development, so we don't understand why the Planning Commission is finding it such a difficult consideration for a residential project. • Finally, we wonder when the Planning Commission lost sight of one of the primary objectives stated in the City of Edina's zoning code: " to minimize the possibility of periodic flooding resulting in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards and related adverse effects." We and others have previously requested that the Planning Commission consider amending Section H Edina City Code 850.11. And Cary Teague presented reasonable, thoughtful language backed by a review of variances issued since the amendment was enacted in 2008. That idea was discussed and presented in a work session with the City Council in September. It seemed like a logical solution. The next day, the Planning Commission had its own work session and in less than 24 hours had decided not to proceed. Needless to say, we were discouraged. Then, at the Planning Commission open house in September the idea was proposed by another resident of a conditional use permit. Keep in mind, this was suggested by a resident, not the Planning Commission who has been given the direction to find solutions. Although we had some reservations about the CUP because it creates so much more work for staff, homeowners and city council, we thought it might be a good idea, especially if the CUP would also allow homeowners goinci to such lengths as a teardown to correct other potential building nuisances and problems and create a new, sustainable structure. Instead, the proposed CUP language only addresses first floor height restriction with even more anal requirements. So here we are more than three months since the July 2 work session where the City Council requested solutions with only one bad idea gone awry. We had hoped by following the process our problem would be resolved. Clearly, the process isn't working and we believe when that happens you go to where the buck stops ... in this case, that would be you. Thank you, again, Mayor Hovland, for taking time to return our call and for your assistance in this frustrating matter. We look forward to hearing from you. Meanwhile, please let us know if you need more information. Best regards. MillerNCarrino 4509 Garrison Lane O E-dina, MN 55424 O 952.926.4839 September 16, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson FROM: Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino RE: Background on Pending Planning /Zoning Issue The attached information is for your background only. No doubt the issue in some fashion will eventually make it to your formal agenda, so we are providing this to you in preparation for future discussion. Last night we attended the Planning Commission's open house meeting where we added our opinions - again — regarding changes we believe should be made to Edina City Code 850.11, Section H restricting first floor height elevations to one foot. We have been opposed to this city code amendment since its first and second readings in November of 2007 because it creates a host of dilemmas for us and potentially others including the need to go through the variance process. Now, with the Minnesota Supreme Court ruling (Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka) our variance request and anticipated building project can't go forward. In addition to the meeting last night, we have also attended and commented at the formal Planning Commission meetings, a work session with City Council and Planning Commissioners on Sept. 7, a Planning Commission work session on Sept. 8, and have had extensive correspondence and discussions with Planning staff. The documents attached are copies of initial correspondence with staff and then a summary presentation we intended to show at the open house with photos. The equipment didn't work so we were unable to visually present our case. A few other important points: Although we are frustrated with the situation, we have no complaints with Planning or other City staff. Kris Aaker, Cary Teague and Heather Worthington have been responsive, professional and resourceful. The City of Edina is fortunate to have them on staff. We hope the Planning Commission will consider what the League of Minnesota is recommending, "that cities should revise building codes to avoid variance requests." After last night's open house, we believe they have some options to consider including language with provisions added to aforementioned code or creating conditional use permits for certain situations. Both options were discussed. We were encouraged that at last night's open house, there were no objections to changing the first floor height restriction from other residents who attended and who were candid in comments about agenda items. It's important to us that you understand this correspondence today is truly for your background. We respect the process and are hopeful the Planning Commission with appropriate input from Planning staff will find a solution. And, in turn, when the City Council receives the proposed solution that it will be a thoughtful and solid one for everyone involved. Thank you for your time and review of the information. Miller— Carrino 4509 Garrison Lane O F-ciina, MN 55424 *° 952.92-6.4859 October 6, 2010 TO: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner FROM: Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino RE: Planning Commission – Please Advise We are writing today to request that you share this letter with the Planning Commission and, in turn, that someone in an official capacity can advise us of next steps. First, we are wondering if there will be another work session before the next Planning Commission. meeting? We understand that we will not be permitted to speak at working sessions, yet we are hoping the Commission will reconsider the language in the proposed new residential Conditional Use Permit as introduced at the Sept. 29 Planning Commission meeting. In addition, we wonder when we will have an opportunity to address what we believe is the wrong direction for the proposed conditional use permit — especially since we were not permitted to comment about critical language introduced by Commissioner Schroeder after public comment at the last Planning Commission meeting. Although we conceptually are in favor of CUP, we had wanted and had hoped the Commission would consider broader language that would have allowed residents like us and others to potentially correct all critical building issues previously handled with the variance process, such as setback restrictions due to irregular- shaped lots, or lot coverage complications, along with the first floor height restriction. Yes, we have been focusing on the first floor height restriction because that is giving us the most amount of building problem from a foundation and structure perspective. Yet, we also have other issues we would have previously presented to Planning Department staff and then sought to correct with the variance application. When the suggestion of a CUP was made by another resident at the Planning Commission open house, we thought it might be something we could support if it also helped deal with ALL potential residential building variances including our proposed project. We have reviewed other municipalities CUPS and most of those are much broader than the one being proposed by Edina's Planning Commission and not limited to one or two specific code issues. Further, had we been able to comment on the new language proposed by Commissioner Schroeder, we would have vehemently opposed it. The fact that we now need to prove high ground water with a ydro- geologic investigation is an outrage, ludicrous and simply mean - spirited. We would not have been forced to go to such dramatic efforts for the variance process, prior to the Krummenacher ruling. Perhaps most importantly, we have since learned from two well- respected engineering companies that hydro - geologic investigations (as stated in the proposed conditional use permit language) are rarely conducted in residential areas; that they are very expensive (we are told "thousands of dollars ") and typically used to investigate ground water contamination NOT high ground water problems. One engineer said that those conditions —high ground water —are typically validated by experiential findings such as previous flooding, ongoing indications of dampness or condensation or even mold —all of the findings we have previously presented in our testimony. Clearly we left last week's planning commission meeting on Sept. 29 less than pleased. Although difficult to completely describe, we feel compelled to share our frustration at this point... We are primarily frustrated by the so- called process and quite frankly are feeling like the enemy instead of homeowners wanting to improve AND protect their investment. At best, we feel like "the pickle in middle " —a baseball analogy we've used previously to describe our frustration. The only difference is that we don't know which team we are supposed to be playing nice with nor which bases we are supposed to try and conquer. The city hall game just shouldn't be this difficult. We've tried to be respectful of the "process" (is there one, really ?) and yet feel that since our project was put on hold in late June that we are no closer to resolve. The only thing that has happened in three months is that we've lost money, time and patience. As we look back over the last three months of the six meetings we've attended, the support documents we have provided and the messages we've tried to convey through testimony, we remain baffled as to why a more collegial and productive solution has not begun to surface. Especially considering that: During a work session on July 2 Mayor Hovland and the City Council directed Commissioners to find solutions. Mayor Hovland specifically asked "What can we do to run the city ... what tools do we have in the toolbox ?" Councilmember Swenson noted, "We would do our community a disservice if we wait until the State reacts to the Krummenacher ruling." Councilmember Housh asked the City Attorney and Commissioners to "work on other tools...as an older community we need to evolve." The City Attorney AND the League of Minnesota Cities have advised municipalities in light of Krummenacher to revise building ordinances or find other solutions so that projects can avoid the variance process. • One of the primary objectives stated in the City of Edina's zoning code is: "to minimize the possibility of periodic flooding resulting in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards and related adverse effects." In summary we ask: • For guidance on next steps— effective next steps that we hope will be less antagonistic and will move towards a logical and fair solution. • That the Planning Commission revisit its goals and objectives as stated in the City Zoning Code, as suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities, and as directed by the Mayor and City Council. • That language in the proposed new Conditional Use Permit will be more flexible, and in light of Krummenacher, be applicable to the most common residential variance requests so that the Planning Department can begin offering ALL inquiring homeowners an option, even if it is temporary, or a "placecard" until the Legislature corrects the Supreme Court mess. Thank you, Kris, for forwarding our email to the Planning Commission. We remain appreciative of your time and assistance. Susan Howl RECEIVED OCT 112010 From: Susan [mailto:spetersen4 @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 5:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corporation waiver for easement and rebate of taxes of $200,000 I just want to comment on the Shelter Corporation --#1 I say no,no to $100,000 Park Dedication waiver for easement #2 1 say no,no to rebate of taxes of $200,000 over 20 years I have a question why are these issues even being given consideration, what makes Shelter special? No corporation or business should have taxes waived. I dont like subsidizing any business or corporation this means we will pay more in taxes. Why did city council even vote for this senior complex if they want to have all there taxes waived that we as citizens have to pay. I say enough is enough dont give this consideration The city wont have any revenue to stay alive if you waive taxes for this corporation or any other business We voted for you please consider what this will do to the people that live in edina Concerned citizen . fi o e 0 •r • �roRPO 1888 REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. -1 DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: OCTOBER 19, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan Howl Subject: FW: Mayor Hoveland, re speeding article RECEINED OCT 1 20�� From: RJC23 @aol.com [mailto:RJC23 @aol.com] Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:31 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Mayor Hoveland, re speeding article read with interest . the article in today's Star Tribune regarding Edina's aggressive approach to speeding. I wonder if the three officers' pay is related to the number of tickets issued. I also wonder why they position themselves at the bottom Of inclines, i.e. Fiftieth Street between City Hall and Wooddale or France Avenue between Glendale Terrace and,41.st Street, where even the'most law abiding citizen may exceed the posted limit due to gravity. Why not posta sign that there maybe a- Barney Fife lurking at the bottom of such inclines? Maybe the revenues would go down but the speeding.,(if coasting down an incline at 4 or 5 miles over the limit meets that definition) would go down as well. Which is it, revenues or safety? If it's revenues', I suggest that Edina's finest start wearing Smoky the Bear hats and mirrored: shades like their counterparts in Alabama, Mississippi etc. I thought the article was disgusting and as a 44 year resident of the City; ashamed. Bob Christianson, former member of the Edina- School Board and the Park & Recreation Board. ps. I have not -been ticketed so I don't have a personal ax to grind 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL RECEIVED From: Carol Dubay [mailto:caroldubay @comcast.net] OCT 1 1010 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:02 PM To Lynette Biunno Subject: NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL Edina City Council, I am writing to voice my support for the proposed Nine: Mile Creek Regional Trail through Edina. My husband and I are recreational bikers and are so glad that this trail is under consideration. My family and I lived in Edina for over 20 years. It is well past time for the City of Edina to participate in the regional trail system. The trail'should be safe, comfortable, and inviting for all ages and skill levels. That is why I strongly recommend the parks alternative rather that existing roadways. I am particularly concerned about the huge hill on Tracy Ave. Use of this route will certainly severely limit use of the trail. As seniors, my husband and I would not use the trail if the route includes this hill. In summary, I urge you to approve the proposed regional trail and select routes through parks. Sincerely, Carol Dubay (952) 922 -5695 13975 Saint Andrew Dr Eden Prairie, MN 55346 carold u bay(cDcomcast. net �A Minutes of the Edina Park Board September 14, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Ellen Jones, Jennifer Kenney, Austin -Dummer, Felix Pronove, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Louise Segreto MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lough STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet' Canton I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 9, 2010 PARK BOARD WORK SESSION MINUTES. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 13, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. WELCOME NEW STUDENT MEMBERS Mr. Hulbert introduced and welcomed Austin Dummer and Felix Pronove, the two new student Park Board members. III. NEW BUSINESS A. 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Plan — Mr. Keprios gave the Park Board a brief power point presentation to summarize the 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he is recommending $30,000 be appropriated as seed money for. planning and developing'ihe proposed Edina Veterans Memorial. He noted that he enviions this money to, help jump start the project by paying for the engineering and architect fees. He indicated that once the committee has their final plan they will bring it, before the Park. Board and ultimately the City Council. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the committee will be fundraising for the rest of the project which they hope to be somewhere between $200,000 and $300,000. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the committee did take a vote on the site for the memorial at their, last meeting and it was decided that Utley Park is where they would like to place the Veterans Memorial. He explained that the committee put:together a list of criteria and from that .list came up with four possible sites. Each member visited those four sites and shared their opinions at the meeting. At that time a vote was taken and they overwhelmingly voted for Utley Park as the site. Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks they will ultimately need to go through a public hearing process before the site and plans can be formally approved. Mr. Meyer asked if staff will oversee the $30,000. Mr. Keprios replied that the $30,000 does not go to the Edina Community Foundation but will remain in the city coffers and is something that he will manage. Mr. Peterson commented that it seems to him that the social center of the city is moving towards Centennial Lakes. He noted that he doesn't know if it meets all the criteria but it would seem to him that someday with the promenade from the Galleria and Target all the way down to the lakes would be a good place for a Fourth of July parade. Mike Goergen, Chair of the Veteran's Memorial Committee, indicated that Centennial Lakes was one of the locations that they did their due diligence on utilizing the criteria. He explained that the general consensus on Centennial Lakes was that it was too commercialized because they are looking for a quieter place where people will be able to meditate, etc. Mr. Keprios pointed out that another site that was considered was Arneson Acres Park but the committee felt it was too residential. The committee did discuss talking to the Edina Historical Society to see if they can come up with something where the public could go to view records that are available. Mr. Keprios pointed out that later in the process they found out that Utley Park was also the site chosen by a group that formed back in the 1940's to be the site of a veterans memorial. They even drew up a small plan and tried to fundraise for it; however, WWII came about and the plan was never developed. Mr. Keprios indicated that unless there are any strong feelings on the Park Board that the committee should consider a different site then that is the direction they are going. Mr. Meyer asked about the restrooms and if they are on track for updating at some point. Mr. Keprios replied that they are probably due for some upgrade because they are very old and will need to be looked at eventually. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that to do the parking lot at Garden Park it's going to cost approximately $250,000. He noted that it is his intention to apply for another youth sports grants since it will be serving such a large athletic complex. He commented that if it were to happen it would allow for them to do additional capital projects that they currently can't afford to do. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios how he defines maintenance versus capital because there are some sites around the city where he thinks with a little more maintenance now they may be able to delay some things awhile. Mr. Keprios replied that the asphalt maintenance is an enormous and expensive challenge. He explained that they send resurfacing professionals to their various sites to get their opinions to see if something can be fixed or does it need to be replaced. Mr. Keprios stated that this has to be analyzed every year and sometimes twice in the same year because they all age a little differently depending on the base. He added that they try their best to stay on top of that with operating budget dollars. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if at some point you need more dollars are you able to move some of the capital into the operating budget and if so how do you make those decisions. Mr. Keprios replied there is over a $250,000 in the operating budget that is called the hard paths and hard surface budget. He noted that it's difficult to keep up with the infrastructure and that the path and hard surface budget is one that keeps getting picked away at and they don't have the dollars to keep up with it. Mr. Keprios pointed out that in the next three years they will have spent $800,000 on just asphalt and unfortunately they have to rely on the capital plan to cover it because the operating budget isn't large enough to cover it. Ms. Segreto asked what the Natural Resource Inventory Assessment is. Mr. Keprios responded that it's a study that the Park Board has requested. He explained it's basically a study and an analysis of the natural resources and especially woodland areas. One of the survey results will be to determine if there are some extremely valuable rare natural resources that they need to be made aware of. In addition, it will tell them where they are when it comes to managing things such as buckthorn control, plantings, etc. He indicated that it basically maps out the parkland throughout the entire city, over 1500 acres, of which many of those acres are wooded and determines how these natural resources should be managed in the future. Mr. Keprios stated then another reason for delaying this is because now that there is an Energy Environment Commission they may have a different view on where the priorities are regarding natural resources and specifically woodland areas, use of pesticides, etc. Ms. Segreto asked if the assessment is being done by a private consultant company to which Mr. Keprios replied yes it would be a private consulting firm and staff would bid the project. Ms. Jones asked Mr. Keprios in regards to pathways if he has explored being able to get any grants. She indicated there are livable grants with paths that somehow connect with other bikeways, etc. Mr. Keprios replied that if there are other grant dollars that haven't been explored he would like to know about them and would be happy to look into them. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that in regards to Countryside Park, the Waters Development is in negotiations with the City Council on what their park dedication fee will be. He noted that they could use some of those Park Development Fund dollars to do some of the maintenance items at Countryside Park and perhaps pull some of the master plan further up on the agenda. He commented that it is his view that those dollars should go to serve the park closest to the development, so that might be another area where they may have dollars coming in. Mr. Keprios explained that for 2015 he had originally focused more of the dollars toward accomplishing the rest of the master plan for Countryside Park. However, with dollars possibly coming from the Water Development he has changed his focus to replacing the warming house at Nonnandale Park. He indicated it's a tough call because what's going to be the most important thing in 2015 probably won't be what it is now. He pointed out the reason he chose this is because it's their highest attended playground program, there is a large demographic population of kids in the neighborhood that is growing, there's a lot of scheduled baseball and the hockey rink as well as the playground equipment is used extensively. Mr. Keprios commented that he would not be offended if someone wanted to make a different recommendation. Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that they did a Needs Assessment Survey four years ago to which 865 people responded, which is phenomenal, and gave them a 95% level of confidence of the results. He indicated that the residents have a need for a wide range of Park and Recreation facilities but first and foremost on the list with 86% is they want more walking and biking trails as well as natural areas and wildlife habitat. He noted that the idea of a recreation center came in second but the next highest on the list is the development of outdoor athletic fields for sports. Mr. Keprios pointed out that Edina is an aging community and therefore it's difficult to get a high percentage of support for things like soccer fields and baseball fields. However, with a primarily more senior aged population 31% is pretty high for the support of athletic fields. Therefore, he does think that validates the Pamela Park master plan new athletic field and would like to keep that on the radar screen. Mr. Keprios stressed that maintenance of the city parks as well as the walking/biking trails are services that should receive the most attention by city officials over the next two years. Mr. Keprios stated that priority wise they are going to first and foremost replace and repair what's broken. Also, the Veterans Memorial is high on the list with $30,000 seed money. In addition, developing new pathways, pathway lights and trails are also high on the priority list. He noted that he thinks they can complete the master plans at Countryside Park and Pamela Park as they can afford to. Mr. Keprios commented that eventually they may want to complete the master plan for Van Valkenburg Park, the small section that can serve as a mini -park for the neighborhood. Mr. Fronek commented that the next three years show an increase of $215,000, $195,000 and $140,000 as compared to what they approved last year. He asked Mr. Keprios to comment on the increase, where those extra dollars are coming from and the thought process that went into those increases. Mr. Keprios replied he is hoping as it goes through the process that the dollars will be there between grants and possibly some other sources. He indicated there is talk about franchise fees that the City Council is closing in on and that those dollars would also go toward their parks capital plan. He noted that is not just for this but also for some of their enterprise facilities that struggle and don't have the capital dollars to make their improvements. Mr. Keprios again noted that the five year capital improvement plan changes. It should change slightly every year to adjust to the needs and other priorities that may surface. He indicated that it gives us a good road map and a good idea of how much money they are going to need to get the projects done. Ms. Jones asked how old is the playground equipment at Countryside Park and is it slated for next year because it's a safety issue. Mr. Keprios explained that through the master 4 plan process they want to relocate the location of the play equipment. In addition, it's a one of a kind in the Edina system and was somewhat experimental in that it's all creative play "equipment and not traditional equipment. He note&they were informed that kids would be wildly attracted,to it; however, that didn't "fur' out to be the case and he heard from several residents over the past several years that they don't like it as well as traditional playground equipment. Mr. Keprios commented that the equipment "is approximately 16.years old. Ms. Segreto indicated that she knows the Bredesen Park comfort station was vandalized a couple of years ago and was wondering what they are doing to safeguard the comfort station.so that it's not vandalized. Mr. Keprios responded they are doing all they can. They have put up security surveillance cameras and have given the police a heads up to patrol the area when they can. He indicated that by keeping the camera highly visible it has reduced a lot of the vandalism. Ms. Segreto asked if there are certain hours the comfort stations are open or are they open 24 hours a day, in particular Bredesen Park. Mr. Keprios replied that Bredesen.is.one of the few that is open 24/7 because they do not have the keyless entry system wired into it. He added that it would cost an additional $12,000 to make that happen plus they would need to pay for an additional phone line. Mr. Keprios indicated that he-thinks-they are waiting for a renovation of the building and hope to get some fiber optics near that site so then they can electronically lock and unlock by computer program like they do at the four newer shelter buildings. He explained that the rest of the shelters are locked and unlocked manually. However, because Bredesen is so heavily used, especially really early in the morning, they just leave it open. Mr. Peterson asked how often the Needs Assessment Survey is done. Mr. Keprios replied in his view it should be done no longer than 15 years apart. He noted that:he believes this past one was done about 25 years ago. Ms. Steel asked what pathways have been added to the park system since the survey. Mr. . Keprios replied that the path at Garden Park has been added since then. He noted that unfortunately a lot of the dollars had to be spent for upkeep and maintenance. He stated that the next added one would be to put lights around the pathway at Lewis Park. The new pathways they are .proposing are for Countryside Park and he would eventually like to get a hard surface path around Highlands Park, which he thinks would be heavily used. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they also need to remember that when the Nine Mile Creek regional trail happens there will be several millions of dollars of new trails for Edina residents that he thinks will go a long way to serve that need. Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED 2011 -2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -PLAN. Louise Segreto SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. Park Assignments — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he and Chairman Hulbert recently discussed the park assignments to see if they wanted to divvy out park assignments any differently now that there are two new student members. He noted that 5 they then discussed what the real purpose is for the park assignments and felt it served a great purpose for the time that it was done. However, it seems that if a resident did come to a Park Board member with a concern it would ultimately end up on the Park Director's desk, which it should. Mr. Keprios indicated that in his view all Park Board members are assigned to all parks and would like to challenge the Park Board to familiarize themselves with all of them. He noted he would be happy to give tours of the parks if anyone was interested. He added that he thinks by doing it this way it will eliminate another step in the process. The Park Board agreed that they no longer need to have park assignments. Mr. Peterson asked Mr. Keprios if he would put in his staff report what issues residents call him about so they have some sense of what people are concerned about. C. Community Advisory Team Report — Member Ellen Jones — Ms. Jones noted that she doesn't have anything to report at this time. III. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Activities Directory - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Mr. MacHolda has done a wonderful job with the Activities Directory that is now on- line. He noted that they have put the map back in to show where all of the parks are as well as it has a matrix showing what facilities are in each park. Mr. Keprios indicated that he is also working with the Statewide Health Improvement Plan (SHIP) group to get a grant to create a three -fold map that shows all of the parks and where all of the amenities are that could be put in your pocket. B. City Manager — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the City Council has hired a new City Manager, Scott Neal, who is from Eden Prairie and will begin November 8`n. In addition, Interim City Manager, Heather Worthington, has accepted a position at Ramsey County and her last day will be October 6`n IV. PARK BOARD COMMENTS A. Hockey Boards — Mr. Hulbert asked if the new hockey rink boards are going in soon at Pamela Park. Mr. Keprios replied yes, they are. He reminded the Park Board that the City Council has approved the purchase and installation for lighting at both Pamela Park and Walnut Ridge Park which are both scheduled to go in this year. He commented that they hope to get them both done this year but if not there will still be general ice rinks and hockey rinks regardless. Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that there is a Joint Work Session between the City Council and Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners scheduled for Wednesday, September 29 at 7:00 p.m. at the South View Middle School Auditorium. He indicated that the Park Board members are being asked to please attend as an observer. He stated what he thinks might happen is eventually the Park Board is going to be asked to come up with a singular route recommendation for which to base a public hearing on but doesn't think they are going to be asked to conduct a public hearing at a Park Board meeting. He will be asking the City Council to -decide on a process for the Park Board and City Council regarding public hearings an&dates. MEETING ADJOURNED 7 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Joel Stegner, Chris Rofidal, Jean Rehkamp Larson, Arlene Forrest, Bob Schwartzbauer, Colleen Curran, Ross Davis, Katherine McLellan, and Lauren Thorson MEMBERS ABSENT: Claudia Carr STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: August 9, 2010 Member Rofidal moved approval of the minutes from the August 9, 2010 meeting. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: COA Process Clarification Planner Repya reminded the Board that at the August meeting they agreed to continue a discussion regarding the potential of expanding the requirement of a COA review to include all changes visible from the street. Currently, when reviewing a COA such as a new detached garage and an addition to the rear of the home that is visible from the street, only the detached garage would be subject to review. A majority of the Board expressed frustration that if an addition occurring as part of a project requiring a COA is visible from the street, it too should be subject to the review of the HPB. In an effort to address this concern, Member Schwartzbauer presented the Board with a draft resolution that would provide for the review of an addition if is part of a project requiring a COA, and visible from the street. Consultant Vogel, unable to attend the meeting, provided his opinion of the resolution in an email to the Board in which he cautioned that requiring a COA for additions visible from the street would increase the workload for staff and the consultant; and might require an amendment to the District's Plan of Treatment, as well as a definition of the term "new construction ". Addressing Mr. Vogel's concerns, Member Schwartzbauer clarified that what he is proposing does not include a review of all additions visible from the street; rather only those that are part of a project that requires a COA (such as the moving a detached garage or the construction of a new garage.) Discussion ensued in which the following comments were expressed: • During the joint work session with the City Council they were very clear in stating that the HPB should take the lead in managing the Country Club District plan of treatment. Minutes Heritage Preservation Board September 14, 2010 • The proposed resolution is a clarification of policy for the review of projects currently subject to COA review; not a requirement increasing the projects needing a COA. • Including the review of an addition visible from the street that is part of a COA application is a change that Planner Repya will convey to the applicants during the meeting that is required prior to making application. • The proposed clarification of what is reviewed as part of the COA application also needs to be clearly defined on the HPB's web site. Board members agreed that the proposed resolution did a good job of addressing the frustration they have experienced when reviewing COA applications. Member Schwartzbauer volunteered to continue working with staff on incorporating any suggested changes to the draft resolution. Board members stated that they appreciated Member Schwartzbauer's work on the resolution, and expressed their desire to continue the discussion until the October meeting when Consultant Vogel will be available to weigh in on the discussion. No formal action was taken. III. MORNINGSIDE BUNGALOW STUDY: Draft Report Review Consultant Vogel provided the Board with a draft copy of the "Historic Bungalows of the Morningside Neighborhood" that was submitted to the Minnesota Historical Society in fulfillment of the CLG matching grant which assisted in funding the project. In a memo to the Board, Mr. Vogel explained that the MHS requirements for the document vary somewhat from the planning needs that have been expressed by the city, thus he requested the Board provide opinions regarding how the study could be enhanced to best meet the goals the HPB has for the project. A general discussion ensued when the following suggestions were provided: • Include a map outlining the Morningside neighborhood (including Individual lots) • Provide photos and /or sketch plans for the various bungalow classifications. • Include a list of the homes in the Morningside neighborhood that have been identified as being bungalow style. • A great report, but a lot of text — provide more visuals (photos, graphics, etc.) Addressing the landmark eligibility requirements, concern was expressed regarding the work entailed, and the related costs in determining the eligibility of potential landmark properties. Questions were also raised regarding the potential workload involved in the event 25 or so bungalow homeowners request landmark designation of their homes at the same time. Planner Repya agreed to forward the Board's comments and questions to Consultant Vogel. Board members agreed that they looked forward to continued discussion of the study with Mr. Vogel at the October meeting. No formal action was taken. 2 Minutes Heritage Preservation Board September 14, 2010 IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None V. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: Elizabeth Montgomery Board members signed a resolution of appreciation thanking Elizabeth Montgomery for serving as a student member on the HPB for two years, during her junior and senior years at Edina High School. VI. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE: September 16 -17 in Winona Planner Repya reported that Chairman Stegner and Members Davis, Carr and Curran will represent the Edina HPB at the State's Preservation Conference in Winona at the end of the week. Board members expressed their gratitude to those attending and agreed that they looked forward to a report on the conference at the October HPB meeting. VII. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. Zoning Ordinance Update Committee Open House — September 15th, 7:00 p.m. Member Forrest announced that the Planning Commission's Zoning Ordinance Update Committee will hold an open house on September 15th to present the results of their work in three areas: 1. An alternate Setback Standard 2. Driveway Width Regulations, and 3. Planned Unit Development Ms. Forrest pointed out that the alternate setback standard and driveway width regulations are both issues that will have an important impact in the Country Club District because the neighborhood consists of many lots that do not meet the current zoning ordinance requirements with respect to setbacks and driveway width. It is hoped that if the City Council approves the proposed changes, non- conforming setbacks and driveway widths will be less of a problem in the future. Member Rehkamp Larson asked if the committee was addressing the setback criteria relative to building height, noting that the current standard prohibits the construction of a gable end Colonial style home on a narrow lot — a real drawback since that is an important architectural style In the Country Club District. Member Forrest explained that she has raised that issue with the committee on several occasions, and will continue to do so. All agreed height/setback calculation is very important for the Country Club District. Following a brief discussion, Ms. Forrest agreed to keep the HPB advised about the proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance. Board members thanked Ms. Forrest for her report, and agreed that they looked forward to some relief from the tight restrictions regarding setbacks and driveway width which currently have a negative impact on the historic Country Club District. 3 Minutes Heritage Preservation Board September 14, 2010 2. Mid - Century Edina —1950 & after. Chairman Stegner observed that since the Heritage Preservation Board was created in 1976, the focus of the Board's activities has centered on the time period from pre -1888 until approximately 1944. The City's Historic Context Study reflects that observation with an emphasis on the growth of the community prior to the 1950's and 1960's. Mr. Stegner pointed out that since Edina experienced its most prolific period of growth and development in the post -war, baby boomer era, perhaps when the Board is working on goal setting, a consideration for adding a mid - century emphasis should be considered. Board members briefly discussed Mr. Stegner's comments; agreeing that a future emphasis on mid - century Edina is worthy of consideration when setting goals. 3. 4602 Bruce Avenue — New Home Member Rehkamp- Larson observed that she toured the new home at 4602 Bruce Avenue that was subject to a COA review by the HPB, and was very pleased. She explained that the scale of the home in context to the surrounding homes is very compatible. Furthermore, she commended the builder, Andy Porter for listening to comments and concerns of the neighbors and HPB; adding that the finished home would serve as a good case study for future projects. Board members expressed their agreement with Ms. Rehkamp Larson, noting that the .new home is a credit to the HPB's efforts in the Country Club District. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE: None IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: October 12, 2010 X. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:25 PM Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya SHIP eNewsletter - October Page 1 of 5 Statewide Health Improvement Program ISION October 13, 2010 In This Issue Mini - grants create awesome changes Community Initiatives • Two -Part Active Living Workshop Series strives to make routine physical activity accessible, easy and affordable to everyone • Mayor leads bike ride on 86th Street to highlight safe cycling • Richfield Bicycle Master Plan Task Force seeks biking ideas from residents • SHIP assists Richfield WIC participants to shop at local farmers market School Initiatives • Students select favorite fruits and vegetables for district -wide school lunch • October 6 Walk or Bike to School Day was picture perfect SHIP Help us make our community better for our health! Share this eNewsletter with a friend Join the SHIP eNewsletter mailing list Mini - grants create awesome changes Last spring Bloomington Public Health awarded SHIP mini - grants to 13 organizations that would implement sustainable changes to increase physical activity and make eating healthier. Since then, awesome and exciting things have happened. Here's a glimpse Students at Highlands Elementary School (Edina) are excited to be eating what they've grown. Over the summer, parent volunteers built 12 raised bed gardens. When school started, students planted vegetables with a 30 -day harvest period. The vegetables will be included in the lunch menu when ready for harvest. The gardens won't feed the whole school yet, so food service will purchase the same items to give students a chance to taste what they've grown. See their pictures and read the Sun Current article. Poplar Bridge (Bloomington) is also making progress with their school garden. Students and parents created their garden beds the week before school started. Photo at right - top Oak Grove, Westwood, Indian Mounds and Ridgeview Elementary Schools and Oak Grove Middle School (Bloomington) are getting started with a number of endeavors to increase physical activity. Yoga Calm, Active Recess, Skillastics, Energizers and a low -ropes course are the endeavors you will hear more about. Photo at right - second from top City of Richfield employees are now able to get energized by their work. City Manager, Steven Devich, implemented a policy for walking meetings. The policy acknowledges the value of walking meetings as a great way to energize the employees' workday while providing essential exercise. The policy establishes important parameters to ensure walking meetings are productive. The City is happy to share this policy. Please contact us for their information. Hope Preschool (Richfield) has had much success implementing changes recommended by the LANA training. One year ago, parents said picky eating was their biggest battle. By the end of the year after doing tasting activities from the training, Hope Preschool staff observed 60 percent of the children would eat anything. Most of the other children were much less picky. Joan Bulfer, Bloomington Public Health nutritionist, said, "Getting kids to SHIP eNewsletter - October Page 2of5 eat fruits and vegetables is a very important step in preventing childhood obesity. The LANA curriculum has been very effective at doing this because children really love the tasting activities." South Education Center concluded a very successful growing season with a celebration lunch. The gourmet lunch was served to school administrators and others who contributed to their success — including SHIP staff. The lunch was provided in part by the school garden that was grown and harvested by the students. Students also assisted in preparing and serving the meal. A video presentation told their garden story beginning with the seeds. It expressed all the commitment and care students and staff gave to this project along the way. It also revealed what the garden gave back. Discussion among diners revolved around excitement and plans for years ahead. Photos at right and below Community Initiatives Two -Part Active Living Workshop Series strives to make routine physical activity accessible, easy and affordable to everyone Residents, Elected Officials, City Staff, School Officials, Business Owners, and Advisory/Commission Members Bloomington, Edina and Richfield SHIP invites you to attend the Two -Part Active Living Workshop Series. The Series will assist community leaders and residents foster a culture of active living where physical activity is integrated with daily routines. In such a culture, routine physical activity is accessible, easy and affordable to everyone. Participants will leave the events with targeted action plans. Part One Date / Time: November 8, 2010 / 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Location: TBD Presented by Mr. Mark Fenton Mr. Fenton is a vocal pedestrian advocate. He is also a recognized authority on public health issues and the need for community, environmental and public policy initiatives to encourage more walking and bicycling. Mr. Fenton will share examples of Active Living from around the country. This will include an overview of the environmental and policy level tools available to create more walkable and bikeable communities. Mr. Fenton will lead participants on a short walk — bring comfortable shoes. Part Two Date / Time: December 1, 2010 / 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Location: TBD Presented by Prevention Minnesota at Blue Cross Blue Shield Experts from Prevention Minnesota will guide participants as they delve deeper into active living planning for each city. Group assessment of local needs, identification of opportunities and prioritization of specific target activities are discussed. http: / /www.ci.bloomington.mn.usl cityhall ldepticoinrnservlpublheal /ship /updatesloctober 1... 10/13/2010 SHIP eNewsletter - October It is recommended that participants attend BOTH Part One and Part Two. There is no cost to attend. Registration and additional information: Contact Robyn Wiesman at 952 - 563 -8917 or rwiesman @ci.bloomington.mn.us. Back Mayor leads bike ride on 86th Street to highlight safe cycling On September 28, 39 City officials and staff members joined Mayor Gene Winstead and Bike Alliance of Minnesota representatives on a bike ride across the newly reconfigured 86th Street in Bloomington. It was an opportunity to showcase and promote the use of recent improvements that make biking safer. Page 3 of 5 Mayor Winstead pointed out dedicated bike lanes, shared lanes, and multi -use trails along 86th Street and other roadways. Patty Soldner and Dan Breva, both League Cycling Instructors, were there to share information about the Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota nfi ured and bike safety tips. The hands -on experience allowed riders to app reciate the newt reconfigured 9 86th Street and discuss other possible projects to increase safe bicycling in Bloomington. Unfortunately, a community bike ride with the Mayor that was to take place on September 23 had to be cancelled due to rain. It will be rescheduled for spring 2011. Thanks to SHIP and City of Bloomington Traffic Engineering Staff who played a large role in organizing the bike ride. Back Richfield Bicycle Master Plan Task Force seeks biking ideas from residents The goal of the Richfield Bicycle Master Plan Task Force is to create a comprehensive master plan that will make it safer and easier for residents of all ages to bike within Richfield and to connect to neighboring communities. To share your ideas about bicycling in Richfield, attend the an Open House hosted by the Task Force on Wednesday, October 20, 2010 from 6:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Richfield Community Center. Representatives from the City Schools, Public Safety, Bicycle Task Force, and neighboring community bike ambassadors will be there to contribute to the discussion. The Task Force was formed to create the master plan upon receiving a SHIP mini - grant. Since April they have been meeting monthly to develop a comprehensive bicycle master plan for the City of Richfield. Creating the master plan relies on input from residents. Members of the task force include SHIP staff person, Robyn Wiesman, transportation commissioners, a planning commissioner, a community service commissioner, and residents. They will hold their monthly meeting following the open house at 7:30. It is open to the public. More information about attending the open house can be found he,e. BacK SHIP assists Richfield WIC participants to shop at local farmers market This summer, SHIP helped Richfield WIC (Women, Infants and Children) clients purchase fresh fruits and vegetables from the Richfield Farmers Market. The WIC supplemental nutrition program provides farmers market vouchers so program participants can benefit from the health value of fresh fruits and vegetables. The Richfield htr„• / /ww.w_ci _ blcomington .mn.us /citvhall /dept/commsery /publheal /ship /updates /octoberl ... 10/13/2010 SHIP eNewsletter - October Page 4 of 5 Farmers Market will be authorized to accept the vouchers beginning in 2011. This year, SHIP was able to provide Richfield WIC clients with $4 certificates to purchase produce at the Richfield Farmers Market. The WIC program distributed 142 fruit and vegetable certificates to be used in August and September. The certificates were also provided to encourage Richfield WIC clients to shop at the Richfield Farmers Market next year when it is authorized to accept WIC vouchers. Back School Initiatives Students select favorite fruits and vegetables for district -wide school lunch Students at Oak Grove Elementary School participated in a Minnesota Department of Education fruit and vegetable tasting project last year. Teachers collected students' evaluations of weekly fruit or vegetable snacks. Over the summer, SHIP staff analyzed the results. Fruits that students liked best are strawberries, bananas and pineapple. They also liked cantaloupe, honey dew, minneolas, blackberries, mango and kiwi. Favorite vegetables included mini carrots and sliced cucumbers. Food service will now incorporate more of the fruits and vegetables students liked best into the district -wide menu. Some of the fruits and vegetables are new to students and others will be prepared in a variety of ways. For example, fresh pineapple was a favorite new fruit. Other favorites like the carrots and cucumbers are not new to the menu but can be added in a number of different ways to the menu. Beck October 6 Walk or Bike to School Day was picture perfect If you were out and about in Bloomington, Edina or Richfield on the morning of October 6, you may have observed sidewalks crowded with students and parents. The day couldn't have been better for Bike or Walk to School Day. This year nine area schools participated in the event with other students worldwide to celebrate the health benefits of walking. Plus, it was a lot of fun. You'll read more about the event next month when results are in. For now, you can enjoy some of the pictures. ,L http:// www. ci. bloomington. nin. usl cityhallldepticommservlpublheal /ship /updatesloctober l ... 10/13/2010 SHIP eNewsletter - October ul hum yy { S .a; A C^.. r Ir tx p Page 5 of 5 httn- / /www_ci _bloominaton.iml.us /citvhall /dent /conunsery /Uublheal /ship /updates /october 1... 10/13/2010 ■ Conducted the Edina Community Readiness survey to gather residents' opinions on the use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs among young people. ■ Completed biannual evaluation of the Tri -City Partners Coalition and Steering Committee. ■ Evaluated feedback from events held in the Community. Through working together, we continue to accomplish a great deal. Businesses Law enforcement Organizations Media Parents Youth Schools Faith communities Local government Healthcare Civic and volunteer groups Tri -Gity " Partners Tri -City Partners Coalition is primarily funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Sober Truth On Preventing Underage Drinking (STOP) grant and the McKnight Foundation. For more information, contact us at 952 - 563 -8984 or www.tricitypartners.org. • E TrImCity Pay �&r� Coalition for Healthy Youth and Communities M T' -, -4 Strategic Prevention Framework The Tri -City Partners Coalition uses the Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF). • The SPF is built on a community -based risk and protective factors approach to prevention. It has a series of guiding principles that can be utilized at the community level. SPF requires TCP to systematically do the following: 1. Assess TCP's prevention needs based on data 2. Build TCP's prevention Capacity 3. Develop a strategic Plan 4. Implement effective community prevention programs, policies and practices 5. Evaluate our efforts for outcomes • Conducted interviews and surveys with hotel /motel managers to assess underage drinking issues. • Conducted school and law enforcement surveys to explore ways to strengthen substance prevention partnerships. • • Bloomington, Edina and Richfield schools conducted Minnesota Student Survey with sixth -, ninth- and twelfth -grade students. • Monitored and tracked monthly tabulations for juvenile citations in each city for alcohol, tobacco and curfew. • Conducted survey in the three communities regarding adult perceptions related to youth alcohol, tobacco and drug use. a Developed the Tri -City Partners Coalition brochure in English and Spanish. A Held a Tri -City Partners capacity building retreat. a Collaborated with Bloomington Schools on the two -day Chemical Health and Violence Prevention workshop. Ai Co- sponsored a community event with Edina Chemical Health Partners featuring a presentation by Joseph A. Califano, Jr., former U.S. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. Co- sponsored the annual, statewide Shutting Off the Tap to Teens and Young Adults skill - building conference. Sponsored Facilitating Change —a two -part, skill - building workshop on motivational interviewing for • professionals working with adult and youth clients with substance use concerns. Distributed the Tri City Partners Coalition e- newsletter to over three hundred and fifty people each month. Continued to distribute English and Spanish "Let's Talk" conversation starter resource. Expanded Safe House in Bloomington to 250 families along with the Bloomington Athletic /Activities Department. v Monitored alcohol and tobacco compliance checks in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Partnered with schools, faith communities and community organizations in implementing the Together We Stand Campaign with key messages "Celebrate Without Alcohol" and "Graduate Without Alcohol." a Co- facilitated the Edina Parent Forum We Can Do this Together) Raising Youth in a Drinking Culture. Co- sponsored Walking the Talk presentations for Spanish- speaking parents in Bloomington and Richfield. The presentation helps parents and other adults talk with children about the use and nonuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. Coordinated a workshop with Jefferson High School on parents' roles in preventing underage drinking. Held an information session for parents about managing their children's Internet, text messaging, IMing and cell phone use. v Supervised Youth Action Crew (BYAC) Project in Bloomington. BYAC distributed over 4,000 youth - friendly maps, presented to eighth- graders on transitioning to high school and collaborated with Bloomington Educational Cable Television in scripting and filming two public service announcements on underage drinking prevention. ■ Partnered with the Richfield Youth Action Crew in designing and implementing skill - building trainings for the Bloomington Youth Action Crew. Formed a Fatal Crash Review Committee to work toward reducing traffic deaths and serious injuries in Bloomington. a Developed a work plan for implementing solutions to reducing future traffic deaths and serious injuries. Our Focus 1. Underage drinking prevention 2. Marijuana and other drug use prevention 3. Policy change 4. Positive social norm marketing campaign 5. Healthy youth development/ promoting protective factors ■ Worked on strategic plan through meeting monthly with the Steering committee, Policy Action Team and Positive Social Norms Marketing Action Team. Disease reports are investigated promptly to decrease the risk of transmission in the community. Overall immunity of the population is improved and maintained. Residents are aware of how to prevent the spread of infectious disease. 17 Resident gets up -to -date on his immunizations. DISEASE PREVENTION & CONTROL INFLUENZA # seasonal f /ushots/ #H1N1 shots Flu shots for adults and children administered on- and off -site. CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATIONS (0 -18 YEARS) #ofclients/ #ofshots Immunizations for tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, Hepatitis B, polio. Hib, varicella, and pneumococcal disease. ADULT IMMUNIZATIONS # of clients,# of shots Immunizations for tetanus, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis A. polio, and pneumococcal disease. MANTOUX # of tests administered Testing for employers, employees, students, immigrants, and those seeking employment. INTAKE AND HELP LINE Public Health Nurse contacts for resources and information. 18 # of contacts Assure the quality and accessibility of health services COMMUNITY BENEFITS The community has programs that reflect the needs of residents. Residents are able to access programs that help meet their healthcare needs. Low income residents are able to find and obtain public- funded health insurance. Women have healthier pregnancies and healthy babies. Women with insurance have access to health screening. Residents have access to affordable health screening. Families of children with special needs can readily access services they need. Residents have access to the health and mental health services they need. 19 HEALTH PROMOTION IN THE COMMUNITY CLASSES AND OUTREACH #ofstudentattendees Dfiectedtostudents. Information on preventing tobacco, drug, and alcohol use; early sexual activity; teen pregnancy; sexually transmitted infections; and other risk behaviors. Healthy behaviors, such as increasing physical activity and healthy nutrition, are promoted. EDUCATIONAL PRESENTATIONS #of attendees Dfrectedtopaients, adufts, aommunftymemberx Information on healthy behaviors, asset building, limit setting. alcohol, tobacco, other drugs, and laws involving youth. SENIOR HEALTH PROMOTION Nurses talk with seniors about preventative measures for healthy aging (at senior centers and senior housing complexes). CAR SEATS # ofcarseats provided Staff person, nationally certified as a child passenger safety technician, provides car seats and education to assure proper use by parents and children. 16 In August, 2009, Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Minnesota awarded funds to Bloomington Public Health for the 2- year Healthy Togetherproject. ft is a project for newAmencons to improve health, connect with the community and connect with health services. FOR FAMILIES Eden Bloomington Edina Richfield Prairie SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES 63/ • CHARTER AND NON- PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN RICHFIELD 4 Nursing services for adults and children, including first aid, medication 1 administration, consultation and follow -up. NA # of student contacts /# of adult contacts 190 Vision, hearing, and scoliosis screening. NA • HEAD START AND FAMILY SCHOOL #ofscreenings 57 Child health and developmental screening. • SOUTH VISTA/WAVE ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOOL 82 families / 113 clients Nursing services to students. CHILD CARE CENTER /CONSULTATIONS #ofvisits/ #of centers 116/ Monthly health and safety consultations with daycare center staff and directors. 10 SHIELD # of referrals/# of visits (South Hennepin Interagency Early Learning& Development) 147/ Families with concerns about their child's (age 0 -3 years) development can 283 access resources for help. Nurses assist families through the process. FOLLOW -ALONG PROGRAM # of children enrolled Helps parents know if their child's (age 0 -3 years) development (playing, talking, 182 laughing, moving, growing) is age - appropriate through periodic questionnaires. VISITS TO FAMILIES • PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE HOME VISITS #offami/ies/ #ofvisits 380/ Visits made for high -risk pregnancy, post- partum, newborn care, child 1413 development. parenting concerns, and help with community resources. • BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOLLOW -UP #ofnewborns Information provided to families with new babies. Invited to enroll in 473 Follow -Along Program. Home visits offered. • COMMUNITY RESOURCE SPECIALIST # ofphoneand home visits Bilingual, Spanish- speaking staff provide resources to families. 828 FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAM #of reports reviewed Nurses review police reports to assure families and individuals are linked with 466 needed resources and health care. Program funded by the United Way. 15 NA 1690/ NA 1.065 NA 953 NA 0 134 2 899 visits 46/ 63/ 10/ 4 6 1 76/ 106/ 127/ 190 176 245 43 137 30 89/ 421/ 10/ 345 1102 45 162 356 NA 57 1373 131 106 30 NA n CLINICS CM WOMEN'S HEALTH • BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING #of clients Sage Program for uninsured and under - insured women age 40 and older. • CARDIOVASCULAR SCREENING #of clients Sage Plus Program for cardiovascular education. WIC (WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN) #of clients For nutritionally at -risk pregnant and breast - feeding women and children up to five years of age. Provides nutrition education and food vouchers. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT #of assessments Cholesterol, lipid profile, and total blood chemistry tested at quarterly clinics. One -on -one nutrition education sessions included. 20 "/just wanted to send my sincere thanks for the wonderful andgenerous care l received from you at my appointment last week! /really appreciate the excellent attention to detail and the time you spent with me as a patient. /' n so thankful that the Sage Program exists and is available to women (like me) with no health insurance. It felt so good to be taking care of myself!" Sage Program client /resident Other Bloomington Edina Richfield Cities 168 66 61 1052 69 26 24 484 2970 343 2342 32 71 15 11 27 COMMUNITY BENEFITS A better trained workforce supports a more effective response. Community organizations are more prepared to help people in need during an emergency. Public Health distributes timely, effective communications. Individuals and families are more prepared. Community Emergency Response Teams are trained and ready to assist. 21 FOR SENIORS Bloomington Edina Richfield TALK WITH THE NURSE # of clients/# of visits Clinics held at community locations provide one -on -one consultation with a Public Health Nurse. "Talks" include issues such as blood pressure, healthy 378/ 161/ 119/ living tips, medication review, safety, active aging, community resources, and 995 443 391 staying independent. HIGH -RISK HOME ASSESSMENT #of clients/# of visits Public Health Nurses assess physical, psychosocial, and environmental risk 102/ 41/ 29/ factors and provide referrals, consultation, education, and advocacy for 421 105 144 vulnerable seniors. HEARING SCREENINGS FOR SENIORS #ofscreenings Public Health Nurses offer hearing screening for seniors in conjunction with blood �$ NA pressure checks. 14 Julie, a Public Health Nurse, checks the heart rate ofa community seniorata Talk With the Nurse clinic. In addition to individual consultations, nurses provide monthly education with thegoal ofkeepingseniors healthy and safe. These services are provided to seniors at no cost. Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors COMMUNITY BENEFITS Adults and children exercise more and choose healthier foods, resulting in better health and decreased health care costs due to a decrease in obesity and chronic disease. Teens smoke less, drink less and increase their developmental assets. Teens make healthy decisions regarding sexuality and know how to protect themselves. Fewer teens have babies leading to greater academic success and more stable and self- sufficient futures. Women have healthier pregnancies and healthy babies. Adults and children have safe conditions in their homes and schools. Everyone is able to contribute productively to the community over time. PROGRAM ACTIVITIES INCREASED COMMUNITY PREPAREDNESS: • Recruited and trained 17 long -term care facilities for the ADM (Alternative Dispensing Modalilties) program to receive prophylaxis medication for residents and for staff and their families in emergency situations. • Planned and conducted two functional exercises: Operation SnowballlV - -a regional Cities Readiness Initiative exercise and SnowbabyToo —a local exercise. • Established the Division Operations Center and utilized Incident Command Structure in response to H1N1. Conducted weekly tactics meetings with Incident Command Staff; developed and implemented action plans. • Provided information in English and Spanish about assessing children for H1N 1 to parents of children attending summer recreation programs. • Hosted three H1N1 special meetings for clinic and hospital partners to facilitate cooperation. • Implemented an H1N1 vaccination plan and administered vaccine according to Minnesota Department of Health guidelines at clinics, schools, senior centers and residences, _ daycare centers and in homes. • Distributed nearly 14,000 N95 respirators and surgical masks to clinics and First Responders. • Set up a process to dispense antiviral medications if needed. H1N1 vaccination clinic INCREASED CITY'S CAPACffYTO RESPOND: • Trained 28 CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) members. • Enhanced relationships with partners including school personnel, clinics, hospitals and first responders. • Engaged City Public Works partners in the exercise of our local distribution node. 13 22 i rwnas i Publi sr%iiOfta An 0 Vulnerable adults and seniors Women 40+ health screening WIC Women Infants and Children Supplemental Nutrition Program Flu shots Children 0 -3 early intervention services Immunizations �� Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors Prevent the spread of infectious disease Assure the quality and accessibility of health services Preparing for and responding to disasters and assisting communities in recovery 23 ;, 12 wic Women, Infants and Children Supplemental Nutrition Program WIC is a supplemental nutrition program for pregnant and breastfeeding women, infants and children up to age five. These are stages when nutrition has a profound effect on health and development. Again in 2009, the number of people from our community who participate in this program increased —from 5,600 to 5,687. Nutrition education and the WIC food vouchers help participants improve their nutritional status. This year, a food package change made it easier for participants to follow the advice of WIC nutrition counselors. The new food package added fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains and cultural foods. An average food package is worth $45 per month. The WIC program not only helps participants in our community achieve better health but also contributes to the health of our economy. In 2009, WIC vouchers that were distributed to WIC clients were worth $2,175,042. These are federal dollars that are infused back into our local economy. 11 High -Risk Home Assessments 200 180 160 _. y 140 120 100 0 80 60 40 20 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening 1600 1400 1200 N 1000 800 U a 600 0 ~ 400 200 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 24 Number of WIC Clients (unduplicated) 6000 5000 5378 5600 5687 5066 4000 Y 3693 3000 2000 1000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Learning About Nutrition through Activities (LANA) One SHIP initiative is implemen- tation of policies and practices supporting healthy eating in childcare and preschool settings. In October, Bloomington Public Health hosted a SHIP- funded nutrition workshop for Bloomington, Edina and Richfield childcare and preschool facilities. The LANA (Learning About Nutrition through Activities) curriculum provided resources to help childcare and preschool teachers encourage young children to eat more fruits and vegetables. Best practices in child feeding and adopting a nutrition policy were addressed. Thirty -five childcare providers and preschool teachers representing 25 separate organizations attended the workshop. They left with an action plan for turning learning into practice. SHIP funds will provide additional nutrition and physical activity workshops throughout the grant period. 25 10 Joan, a nutritionist, addresses LANA workshop participants. "What a wealth ofgreat workable application(s) forpreschooli !! i l have already used two of the ideas from the manual, tied them into literacy, and the kids have loved it! L4NA workshop participant SHIP Statewide Health Improvement Program Community Leadership Team In August 2009, the Minnesota Department of Health awarded a SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Program) grant to Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. A Community Leadership Team (CLT) comprised of 19 leaders from the three cities was involved in planning the proposal for implementing SHIP initiatives. As the lead agency, Bloomington Public Health first organized the CLT in January 2009. They met throughout spring to plan interven- tions for the SHIP grant proposal. The goal of these interventions is to increase physical activity, improve nutrition and reduce tobacco use. These interventions take place in schools, communities, worksites and healthcare settings. They will reduce the burden of chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Since award of the grant, the CLT continues to meet on a regular basis to give input and direction for SHIP interventions occurring in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. In October, International Bike or Walk to School Day at Oak Grove Elementary encouraged students to get more physical activity by biking or walking to school. 9 100% L 0 90% E CO 80% 70% 60% H y 50% 40% c 30% U 3 20% v 10% a 0% a o t a � c .a) ;n �> T � N a) Mo � o �Y 'O N L a-. U fa U a� �o C L � 3 a 50°% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Breastfeeding at 3 Months of Age in WIC Bloomington, Edina and Richfield (BER) BER ■ State of MN 72% 73% 75% 68% 2006 2007 2008 2009 Overweight or at Risk of Overweight in WIC Children Bloomington, Edina and Richfield (BER) N BER ■ State of MN 2006 2007 2008 2009 26 Influenza 6000 ■Seasonal flu H1N1 5527 A 5000 uzz 927 875 351 103 N 3000 E E U 2000 7E 0 1000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Early Intervention Services 600 500 W 400 300 L U <c 200 0 100 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 27 HINI The 2009 global outbreak of a new H1N1 influenza virus strain kept Bloomington Public Health staff busy from April 2009 into 2010. This virus affected young and school -aged people more than others. Consequently, we focused much of our efforts on partnering with the school districts to hold clinics for vaccinating this group. In November and December, over 5,500 vaccinations were given in clinics held at schools in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. On November 21, nearly 2,000 H 1N 1 vaccine shots were given in three hours at three simultaneous clinics, setting a new Division record. This public health emergency enabled us to strengthen our partnership with the private sector as well. Together we vaccinated nearly 25 percent of the Bloomington, Edina and Richfield population. In all, we were well prepared for this public health emergency. Plans and go -kits with clinic supplies were ready. This emergency offered us the first opportunity to test our plans and to use the Incident Command training that we learned and exercised over the past several years. 8 Child receiving H1N1 nasal spray. V attended the (HI NI) clinic at Richfield High School and was impressed with how quickly and efficiently we moved through the clinic. " Richfield Advisory Board of Health Member IMMUNIZATIONS Public Health provides a safety net for those without insurance who need immunizations to safeguard them from diseases such as pertussis , tetanus, diphtheria, measles, mumps and rubella. RESOURCES AND INFORMATION Public Health Nurses provide resources and information to the public by phone and on a walk -in basis. The number of these contacts decreased from 2005 to 2008. In large part, the decrease is due to the closure of the Family Planning and Sexually Transmitted Diseases program in 2007. BLOOMINGTON ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH Michael Bawek Alice Chu Carol Oldowski Julie Varvel Lynnette Buckley Michael Dardis Allyson Schlichte 2009 PROJECTS • Kept appraised of issues facing the City as the H 1N 1 pandemic unfolded and vaccine became available. • Had member serve on the Statewide Health Improvement Program Community Leadership Team and worked to submit a grant application. • Reviewed a variety of reports and presentations on WIC program food package changes, the Culture Care Connection initiative and Family Health programs. • Solicited and considered nominations for the Health Promotion Award, which honors efforts to improve the community's health, and the Food Safety Award, which recognizes safe food handling practices. • 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 6.1% c 5.0% 4.0% a� U a, 3.0% a 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 2001 Uninsured Rates in Hennepin County, 2001 -2009 State of MN ■ Hennepin County 7.7% 7.2% 2004 2007 9.1% 2009 Lack of insurance In 2009, the state uninsured rate rose to 9.1 percent from 7.2 percent in 2007. Further, this rate was higher among racial and ethnic groups. Nearly 29 percent of Latinos had no health insurance in 2009. Use of public health insurance increased from 25 percent in 2007 to nearly 29 percent in 2009. Bloomington Public Health provides a number of services for people in these situations. Some examples are free or reduced -cost immunizations, influenza vaccinations, screenings for breast and cervical cancers and heart disease, car seats for new babies, and food vouchers for breastfeeding and pregnant women, infants and children. Il Unemployment Unemployment with loss of health insurance can limit access to healthcare services. Unemployment rates have been gradually increasing since 2005. 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% -a 6.0% a� 0 E 5.0% m 4.0`% U n. 3.090 2.01% 0.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 Unemployment Rates in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield, 2005 -2009 � Edina rra•rr Bloomington Richfield State of MN EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE William Alldredge Mark Johnson Idelle Longman Tolu Oyelowo Janetlohnson Mary 10 Kingston Brad Montgomery Dolan Lee (Student) 2009 PROJECTS • Evaluated needs of senior residents at the Edina Senior Expo. • Reviewed annual report of Edina school nursing services and food services. • Reviewed and assessed community health services and public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina by Bloomington Public Health. • Reviewed chemical health programs for students and families in Edina. • Reviewed status of H1N1 illness and immunization in the community. • Authored a guest columnist article on mental health disparities in the Sun Current newspaper. RICHFIELD ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH Benjavan Byrd - Warner Yazdaan Juma 10 Romer Jennifer Turrentine Rhonda Gibson Phillip Kelly Patrick Suglia Carlene Ulmer Betty Gustafson Chris Olsen Matt Tietje 2009 PROJECTS • Awarded the 2008 Food Safety Awards. • Participated in the Richfield School District Wellness Expo. • Presented the RABH 2008 Annual Report to the City Council. • Appointed member and City liaison to participate in the Community Leadership Team that worked to submit a grant for the Statewide Health Improvement Program. 5 30 2009 FINANCIALS TOTAL REVENUE: $3,731,002 Medicare/ Medicaid $11,730 (0.3 %) School Health Services Contracts , $75,112 (2.0 %) Private Insurance Reimbursements /Managed Care $81,475 (2.2 %) United Way Grant $90,094 (2.4 %) Fees for Services $215,517 (5.8 %) Bloomington Community Health Services $253,224 (6.8 %) Emergency Preparedness Fund $313,998 (8.4 %) Edina and Richfield Contracts $ 449,928 (12.1 %) City of Bloomington $699,352 (18.7 %) State and Federal Grants $1,540,572 (41.3 %) $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500.000 $2.000,000 $2,500,000 TOTAL EXPENSES: $3,731,002 Disaster Preparedness _ $296,733 (8.0 %) Infectious Diseases _ $302,667 (8.1 %) Infrastructure $385,657 (10.3 %) Quality and Accessibility of Health Services $ 736,874 (19.8 %) Healthy Communities $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 ■ $2,009,071 (53.8 %) $2.000.000 $2.500,000 Income level Income level affects health and access to health services. A good proxy for the income status of a community can be obtained from the percentage of students eligible for the income -based free and reduced lunch program. In Bloomington, Edina and Richfield, these percentages have steadily increased over the last 10 years. This suggests a continued need for services provided by Bloomington Public Health. 31 4 Students Eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch 100% Bloomington +Edina --d-- Richfield State 90% .. N, " 800 c 0 70% 62.4% G 60% 0 a CD 50% a y 4U' /o 36.3% a a� � ° 30% E J 45% ,-, 20 "k 17.9% 7.7 %'' C1_ 10% 2.2% 0% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 31 4 Income level 2009 STAFFING Distribution of Employees 64 Staff ` ■ Full -Time Positions = 30 people ■ Part -Time Staff= 25 people Temporary Part -Time Staff= 9 people 42.13 Full -Time Equivalents PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION EMPLOYEES 1 Administrator 3 Program Managers 1 Health Activity Supervisor 28 Public Health Nurses 1 Registered Nurse 1 Licensed Practical Nurse 6 Dietitians 1 Emergency Preparedness Coordinator 10 Health Promotion Specialists CONTRACTED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 1 Physician 3 Nurse Practitioners 32 4 7 T, 2 Translators/ Community Resource Specialists 1 Communications & Health Promotion Specialist 1 Public Health Planner 1 Accountant 1 Account Clerk 1 Office Supervisor 4 Office Assistants 1 Office Support Specialist 1 Speech /Language Pathologist to our 2009 grant funders Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota Foundation Education Foundation of Bloomington GreaterTwin Cities United Way Homeland Security and Emergency Management Citizen Corps Program McKnight Foundation - Out of School Time Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Medical Response System Minnesota Department of Health Park Nicollet Foundation Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration - Drug Free Communities Program Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration - Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking Act Grant UCare Fund Friends of Public Health, Two major events characterized 2009 - H1N1 influenza and the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP). H 1N1 first appeared in Minnesota in April. It didn't take long forthe World Health Organization to declare a pandemic - the first one in over 40 years. I'm pleased to say that all the regional and local planning that we've done over the past 6+ years paid off! Working long hours with the cooperation of our partners - school districts, healthcare providers and our local hospital - allowed us to vaccinate about twenty -five percent of our population. We now know that it was not a severe pandemic and that, although lives were lost, what we feared most did not happen. The lessons that we learned from this pandemic will help prepare us for the next one. The Statewide Health Improvement Program, a part of Minnesota's healthcare reform law to reduce tobacco use and obesity, is the first of its kind in the country. Working jointly with the Richfield and Edina Community Health Boards, we were one of nine implementation grants funded in the state. With a strong community leadership team already in place, we were able to hit the ground running. This summer we are reaping the fruits of our labor with a new farmers market in Edina, a second site added to the Richfield market and expanded farmers market outreach to all Bloomington residents - and this is just one example! My advice - eat fresh and local and keep on moving!! Here's to your Health! Karen Zeleznak Public Health Administrator 2 W-wo it lllllllllllllwW w No r wvwM ■ Owl �i err i■ �■r�w w arr OMN f Imam I Education Foundation OF BLOOMINGTON ®Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota Foundation Park Nicollet Park Nicollet Foundation L, ��?EWHOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Our agency originated in 1948 to provide school nursing services. In 1960 we were established as a community -based public health division for the City of Bloomington. Since that time we have been providing health services and programs for Bloomington residents and employees. Since 1977 our services have been contracted by the cities of Richfield and Edina. Mission TO PROMOTE, PROTECT, and CARE for the health of our community TO EMPOWER PEOPLE to lead healthy lives TO BUILD AN ENVIRONMENT free of preventable problems TO ASSURE ACCESS to appropriate health care at a reasonable cost CITY OF Bloomington Public Health • 1900 W. Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, MN 55431 —�jfj tf LOOM I N (952) 563 -8900 • V /TTY 952- 563 -8900 • www.ci.bloomington.mn.us �_ MINNESOTA TA business start -up health, lagged most peer regions from 2002 to 2006. Minnesota saw a net flow of 1,218 small and medium businesses leave the state from 1997 to 2008 —ii. These worrying economic trends of declining entrepreneurship, slow small business growth, and migration to other regions indicate the insufficient support for entrepreneurs. "Entrepreneurial activity', 2007 Entrepreneurship growth, 2002 -07 epreneurs1 per 100,000 people CAGR California' Colorado North Carolina Maryland Minnesota Texas Illinois Washington Ohio 396 338 321 319 312 295 1 A, U.S. average: 300 State rank 1 = highest 10 17 19 20 26 40 43 47 -3.90 -2.90 -3.10 -2.50 -2.50 1 ,(, 1 Using Census Current Population Survey data, the study tracks the number of non - business owners who become business owners month -to -month 2 First -time entrepreneurs 3 Peer states chosen based on similar population, GDP per capita, education levels, business climate, industry diversity, and labor laws SOURCE: Kauffman Foundation Index of Entrepreneurial Activity, 2007 Finding capital is a challenge for most entrepreneurs, but is especially difficult for those in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region, which lags peer regions at all stages of starting and growing a business. Minnesota overall lags peer states and the national average in seed and early -stage per capita investments (Exhibit 10). The region also significantly lags most peer regions in venture capital investment, both in terms of total number of deals and value per deal (Exhibit 11). Minneapolis -St. Paul also trails peer cities in traditional small business lending, and the gap is growing (Exhibit 12). Neighboring states have introduced compelling incentives to encourage investors to sponsor companies located in their state. For example, Wisconsin, Iowa, and North Dakota all offer tax credits to angel investors. Minnesota passed an angel tax credit this legislative session, which is a significant positive step for increasing access to capital for entrepreneurs. A vibrant entrepreneurial culture, strong networks and support resources are all crucial to the success of entrepreneurs, but local entrepreneurs say Minneapolis - St. Paul is falling short in these areas. Many interviewees stated start -up failures are often seen as total failures in the region, whereas strong entrepreneurial 4 Exhibit 10 MINNESOTA NEEDS MORE SEED AND EARLY -STAGE FUNDING Seed stage' Early stagez California 239 1,230 Colorado 129 590 Washington 77 560 Maryland 88 382 U.S. 66 360 Texas 48 ' 261 Minnesota 62 261 North Carolina 36 231 Illinois 127 216 Ohio 1380 1 In the seed or initial stage of funding, the company has a concept or product under development but is not fully operational and usually has been in existence less than 18 months 2 In early -stage funding, the company has a product or service in testing or pilot production. In some cases, the product may be commercially available and generating revenues. Companies at this stage are usually in business less than three years SOURCE: PWC Moneytree: U S Census Exhibit 11 THE TWIN CITIES REGION LAGS IN VENTURE CAPITAL DEALS Venture capital investment by metropolitan area, 2006 -09' Number of deals VC investment per capita Average Investment value Bay Area // 822 3 301 24 San Diego 126 1.137 27 Boston 90 561 28 Seattle 90 630 23 Denver 59 785 33 Austin 43 783 30 Raleigh 35 837 26 Twin Cities 34 261 25 Baltimore 15 208 ! 37 Chicago 15 39 25 Sacramento 5 32 13 1 The location of a deal is specified by the location of the receiving company; rounds are counted as separate deals: includes deals $10M and greater SOURCE: Eoonomy.com; Capital 10 cultures view start -up failures as part of the creative process and one step in eventual success. Local business people say the region needs more networking opportunities for young entrepreneurs to learn from experienced start -ups. Exhibit 12 TWIN CITIES SMALL BUSINESSES OBTAIN FEWER LOANS, AND THE GAP IS GROWING Number per small and medium business', 2007 Chicago 1.90 14.5 Chicago Baltimore 1 1.89 12.6 Baltimore 1 Small and medium businesses are those with fewer than 500 employees SOURCE: Federal Financial Institution Examination Council FFIEC MSA Aggregate Report 2007 CAGR( %) 0.07 82 008 45 006 80 0.06 -1 5 0.06 0.08 -0.7 0.08 5.7 Organizations in the region do host speaker series and broad networking events, but many peer regions have more direct programs that support entrepreneurs. For example, an Austin program works with the University of Texas to help early - stage entrepreneurs find funding and provides human capital (business students) and expert guidance. The Wisconsin Entrepreneurs Network provides entrepreneurs access to resources and expert guidance. The Minneapolis -St. Paul region needs to leverage its strengths to improve its climate of innovation and entrepreneurship. The region could realize more value from its strong human capital and the wealth of innovation from the University of Minnesota, Mayo Clinic, and private sector research through targeted initiatives that better translate innovative ideas to the marketplace and catalyze entrepreneurship and job growth. These low ratings are driven in part by health care mandates. Minnesota ranks 50th out of 51 in terms of number of health insurance mandates"-iii. Further, according to interviews, the region's many layers of government often complicate and lengthen the permitting process. As a local real estate developer relayed, "There are companies who were considering locating in the Twin Cities • region – but the length of time required to get their project approved was simply not competitive." This sentiment was widely echoed in the interviews and discussions with area business leaders. Labor Costs The Minneapolis -St. Paul region has a reputation for having high labor costs. As one site selector put it, "You'd need a really good reason to be here... because hourly wage costs are higher." An analysis of labor costs does reveal that lower - skilled workers in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region earn, on average, six percent more in wages than their counterparts in peer cities, while higher - skilled workers6 earn about one percent more -i`. Obviously, while higher wages can discourage companies from moving to the region or expanding here, it also means that lower - skilled workers can maintain a higher standard of living. Multiple factors contribute to this wage premium. First, the region has a relatively old labor force, with 55 percent over the age of 40. Older workers tend to have more experience and receive more compensation than younger workers —those 40 -54 earn an average of 21 percent more. Meanwhile, the region's lower- skilled workers have more education -20 percent hold a bachelor's degree or higher ""—and higher education levels typically command wage premiums. Minnesota's labor laws and industry structure also mean more unionization. About 17 percent of workers in the state belong to unions, the 13th highest rate in the country`*`. Since union labor typically commands premiums upward of 40 percent in total compensation, unionization tends to contribute to higher wages. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Minneapolis -St. Paul has produced many successful entrepreneurs and has a long history of turning small businesses into industry leaders. Medtronic, Best Buy, Carlson Companies and Cargill are just a few examples of local start -ups that have become global enterprises. Much of this success can be attributed to previously mentioned regional strengths, such as human capital. However, in recentyears,the region has struggled to create and grow small businesses. From 2002 -2007, the number of new entrepreneurs declined by 2.5% annually (Exhibit 9). The average ratio of firm births to firm closings, an important measure of 6 High skill employment includes architecture and engineering, arts and design, business and finance, social services, computer and mathematical, education, healthcare, legal, social science, and management occupations. CAOR(%) Sacramento 3.54 20.2 Sacramento Austin 3.10 16.9 Austin San Diego 2.82 16.8 San Diego Seattle 2.13 140 Seattle Twin Cities is= 2.00 ® Twin Cities Chicago 1.90 14.5 Chicago Baltimore 1 1.89 12.6 Baltimore 1 Small and medium businesses are those with fewer than 500 employees SOURCE: Federal Financial Institution Examination Council FFIEC MSA Aggregate Report 2007 CAGR( %) 0.07 82 008 45 006 80 0.06 -1 5 0.06 0.08 -0.7 0.08 5.7 Organizations in the region do host speaker series and broad networking events, but many peer regions have more direct programs that support entrepreneurs. For example, an Austin program works with the University of Texas to help early - stage entrepreneurs find funding and provides human capital (business students) and expert guidance. The Wisconsin Entrepreneurs Network provides entrepreneurs access to resources and expert guidance. The Minneapolis -St. Paul region needs to leverage its strengths to improve its climate of innovation and entrepreneurship. The region could realize more value from its strong human capital and the wealth of innovation from the University of Minnesota, Mayo Clinic, and private sector research through targeted initiatives that better translate innovative ideas to the marketplace and catalyze entrepreneurship and job growth. These low ratings are driven in part by health care mandates. Minnesota ranks 50th out of 51 in terms of number of health insurance mandates"-iii. Further, according to interviews, the region's many layers of government often complicate and lengthen the permitting process. As a local real estate developer relayed, "There are companies who were considering locating in the Twin Cities • region – but the length of time required to get their project approved was simply not competitive." This sentiment was widely echoed in the interviews and discussions with area business leaders. Labor Costs The Minneapolis -St. Paul region has a reputation for having high labor costs. As one site selector put it, "You'd need a really good reason to be here... because hourly wage costs are higher." An analysis of labor costs does reveal that lower - skilled workers in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region earn, on average, six percent more in wages than their counterparts in peer cities, while higher - skilled workers6 earn about one percent more -i`. Obviously, while higher wages can discourage companies from moving to the region or expanding here, it also means that lower - skilled workers can maintain a higher standard of living. Multiple factors contribute to this wage premium. First, the region has a relatively old labor force, with 55 percent over the age of 40. Older workers tend to have more experience and receive more compensation than younger workers —those 40 -54 earn an average of 21 percent more. Meanwhile, the region's lower- skilled workers have more education -20 percent hold a bachelor's degree or higher ""—and higher education levels typically command wage premiums. Minnesota's labor laws and industry structure also mean more unionization. About 17 percent of workers in the state belong to unions, the 13th highest rate in the country`*`. Since union labor typically commands premiums upward of 40 percent in total compensation, unionization tends to contribute to higher wages. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Minneapolis -St. Paul has produced many successful entrepreneurs and has a long history of turning small businesses into industry leaders. Medtronic, Best Buy, Carlson Companies and Cargill are just a few examples of local start -ups that have become global enterprises. Much of this success can be attributed to previously mentioned regional strengths, such as human capital. However, in recentyears,the region has struggled to create and grow small businesses. From 2002 -2007, the number of new entrepreneurs declined by 2.5% annually (Exhibit 9). The average ratio of firm births to firm closings, an important measure of 6 High skill employment includes architecture and engineering, arts and design, business and finance, social services, computer and mathematical, education, healthcare, legal, social science, and management occupations. Singapore at zero ... why would I want to invest in Minnesota or the United States ?" Another local CEO stated, while considering locations for a new customer service call center with over 200 jobs, "We would love to build close to our headquarters. However, the high property and employment tax burdens currently rule out even including Minnesota in our initial screening." These quotes reflect a consistent theme echoed by CEOs and site selectors alike, believing that in the competitive world of investment decision making, Minnesota's tax structure is a substantial and immediate roadblock for those who evaluate the region for expansion potential. Exhibit 8 CORPORATE TAX RATES Combined federal and state corporate tax rate' 2009 Pennsylvania Minnesota Massachusetts 41.5 41.4 41.2 Japan 39.5 U.S. average 39.1 France 34.4 Belgium 34.0 Canada 31.3 Germany 30.2 New Zealand 30.0 Spain 30.0 Australia 30.0 Luxembourg 28.6 United Kingdom 28.0 Mexico 28.0 Norway 28.0 Italy 27.5 Portugal 26.5 Sweden 26.3 Finland 26.0 Netherlands 25.5 N U.S. states Note: Does not include Austria (25%), Denmark (25 %), Greece (25%), Korea (24.2 %). Switzerland (21.17 %), Czech Rep (20%), Hungary (20 %). Turkey (20 %), Poland (19 %), Slovak Rep (19 %), Iceland (15 %), Ireland (12.5 %) 1 Combined rate adjusted for federal deduction of state tax SOURCE: Tax Foundation Regulation By many accounts, Minnesota has a challenging regulatory environment. Forexample, the 2008 U.S. Economic Freedom Index, published by the Pacific Research Institute in association with Forbes magazine, ranks Minnesota 36th out of 50`x". The index measures how regulations impose restrictions on people's behavior and, in turn, impact the free allocation of private resources.5 The Small Business Survival Index came up with a similar assessment, ranking the state 43rd in terms of regulatory environment. Finally, Minnesota ranks 30th on Regulatory Environment by Forbes "Best States for Business" rankings. 5 Indicators include right to work laws, minimum wage laws, and environmental, labor and educational restrictions, among others. LEVERAGING THE REGION'S STRENGTHS MORE EFFECTIVELY Though the region must address some critical challenges, it can build on tremendous assets. Like any successful busi- ness, a region must put those assets to use, deliver efficient marketing to tout competitive advantages, and employ an effective sales force. Our research in other regions —espe - cially those with above - average economic growth —shows that the Minneapolis -St. Paul region can leverage its strengths and market its assets much more effectively. In benchmarking successful regions, one of the most profound and consistent trends was their focus on setting an explicit vision and strategy for regional economic development. A re- gional approach has the benefits of bundling regional assets, leveraging a region's scale more effectively, and maximizing the impact of all economic development efforts. More specifically, in high performing regions, Allegheny Conference For the latter part of the loth century, the steel industry, Pittsburgh's main economic engine, was withering, resulting in above - average unemployment and low employment growth. Compounding the problem, the area's multiple economic development organizations did not coordinate strategies, hampering economic development efforts. To help meet the city's challenges, a group of local leaders agreed to consolidate economic development efforts. The strategy was simple: combine marketing, attraction and retention efforts with research and advocacy into one privately funded organization that would act as the development entity for the entire region. This collaboration led to a new regional vision and branding campaign —along with strong execution. The effort produced 42,000 new jobs between 2002 and 2007 and the attraction of many high - profile companies to the area. From 2oo6 to 2oo8, the organization directly assisted the expansion or relocation Of 105 companies to the region that included $2.2 billion in capital investment'"""' . 9 The Twin Cities stands out in this country like a sore thumb for not having a regional program. You probably have lost a significant amount of corporate prospects due to the lack of a regional agency." strong regional economic develop- ment organizations and coordinated strategies helped attract new com- panies, retain and expand existing companies, and create new com- panies. While the Minneapolis -St. Paul region does have some exist- ing assets within the economic de- velopment sphere, it lacks both a comprehensive vision and a strat- egy. There are many organizations and agencies working on pieces of the economic development puzzle, but efforts are often uncoordinated. As one site selector said, "The Twin Cities stands out in this country like a sore thumb for not having a regional program. You probably have lost a significant amount of corpo- rate prospects due to the lack of a regional agency." Our interviews with best - practice re- gional organizations, business lead- ers and site selectors yielded three core activities of a regional economic development effort: establishing a regional vision, offering attraction services, including regional marketing and branding, and offering retention and expansion services for existing local companies. Regional Vision At the heart of successful econom- ic development efforts is a regional vision for economic growth that le- verages the region's core strengths. Raleigh- Durham, for instance, devel- oped a regional vision "based on the belief that successful regions depend on the intellectual abili- ties of their people" and made the most of their existing human capital advantage and strong base of aca- demic institutions. As they put it: "The Research Triangle Region's vision is to be a world leader in intellectual capacity, education and innovation to enhance productivity and economic growth and achieve a superior quality of life for all our citizens." The Research Triangle developed a clear, measurable, long -term plan to execute on this regional vision: "A five -year, $5- million action agen- da to generate 100,000 new jobs and increase employment in all 13 counties of the Research Triangle Region." The plan exceeded expec- tations, delivering over 110,000 jobs in five years. Opportunity Austin In 2003, the collapse of the dot -com bubble hit the Austin metro area, with unemployment climbing and talented workers leaving the area. Facing this new reality, the Chamber of Commerce created "Opportunity Austin," a new, privately funded economic development organization that agreed on a regional vision and coordinated economic development. The effort also engaged community leaders to attract businesses within specified sectors, retain existing businesses and advocate for policies aimed at economic growth. In addition, the Chamber of Commerce and community leaders pushed several initiatives to create a healthy entrepreneurial ecosystem. The Central Texas Angel Network, which includes about ioo people providing funding for start-up businesses, helps to create a strong private equity community. The Chamber also pushed the legislature to create a $20oM Emerging Technology Fund, run by a statewide board that looks to invest $250,000 to $5M in companies focused on biopharmaceuticals, clean energy, and information technology. The Austin Technology Council organizes networking events and provides a support system for small- businesses. To incubate ideas, the University of Texas sponsors the IC2 program, which helps capitalize the ideas from the University through technology transfer. From these efforts, theAustin area created 124,00o jobs from 2004 to 2008, accounting for $5.7 billion in overall payroll increases, and attracted 144 corporate relocations -ix. A strong regional vision offers several advantages: • First, and most importantly, it coordinates and prioritizes the activities of mul- tiple public, private and academic organizations, making the region signifi- cantly more efficient and effective at creating jobs. • The vision helps convey the region's identity and advantages to companies inside and outside the region, making selling the region much easier. CHALLENGES TO THE REGION'S ECONOMY The Ease and Cost of Doing Business The advantages to Minneapolis -St. Paul companies —high (( The region needs quality of life and an educated workforce —are tempered by e to address its image relatively high taxes and labor costs, both of which exceed g the averages of the nation and peer cities. Indeed, the of being hostile to Milken Institute ranks Minnesota as the 13th most expen- business." sive state for businesses, taking into account the costs of wages, taxes, electricity and rent There is a strong perception —both internally and externally —that the region is a challenging place to do business. According to a site selector who helps companies identify locations for company expansions, "The region needs to address its image of being hostile to business." This negative image of the region is increasingly highlighted by other regions, particularly other Midwestern states, who are working to recruit businesses to their own area. Tax Structure Multiple national rankings place Minnesota near the bottom in terms of the business tax environment. In 2009, for example, the Tax Foundation"' ranked Minnesota 43rd based on corporate, personal, individual, sales and unemployment taxes. The Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council "!� ranked Minnesota 49th based on the impact of the tax code on small businesses, and in 2007, the Milken Institute "' ranked Minnesota 43rd based on annual state tax revenue (( We would love as a share of personal income. to build close to our headquarters. However, the high property and employment tax burdens currently rule out even includin MN in our These rankings are driven largely by Minnesota's high marginal tax rates. The state's top corporate tax rate of 9.8 percent, combined with the national tax rate, is 41.4 percent, second only to Pennsylvania (Exhibit 8) "`. Minnesota's maximum unemployment insurance taxxx for employees making above $25,000 is the highest in the country.° Furthermore, Minnesota's top personal tax rate of 7.9 %, which impacts many pass- through corporations and small businesses, is the nation's 11th highest ". g Tax rates naturally influence decisions to expand in, move initial screening. to, or leave Minnesota. According to one site selector, "The corporate income tax is obscene, at almost 10 %, and per- sonal income tax is not too much better, at almost 8% ... that poses a problem." A As a local CEO of a multinational firm recently asked in a public forum, "If I have a chance to invest in a factory in Ireland at zero [corporate taxes], or a factory in 4 Applying the maximum unemployment insurance rate (9.3% for Minnesota) by the cutoff wage ($25,000 for Minnesota) yields the maximum unemployment tax rate. The University of Minnesota is an important asset to the region, ranked in the top quartile in terms of academic article output per million dollars of academic R &D. The National Science Foundation ranked the University of Minnesota ninth among public universities for R &D expenditures."" According to Essential Science Indicators, the University has three fields of research ranked among the top five programs at public universities: mathematics (2), chemistry (3) and environment /ecology (4). Another 12 programs rank in the top 10, giving the University a total of 15 top-10 programs at public universities in the 19 general fields included in the citation database.-"i" Furthermore, in recent years, the University has strengthened its research commercialization efforts through the Technology Transfer Office, aligned with a previous Itasca Project task force. In 2009, the University earned $95 million in licensing revenue, second among public universities. Grow Minnesota!, organized by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, is an impor- tant business retention program for the region. It uses local chambers of commerce to conduct site visits at local busi- nesses and records findings on a CASE STtJD1t-'S database, which help it advocate policies to aid local businesses. Kansas City Grow Minnesota! shares informa- tion gathered on visits with respec- tive local chambers who work on issues with economic development agencies. While Grow Minnesota! provides a good base, it is a state, not a regional, initiative, and it does not have full, consistent participa- tion across all regional chambers. Attraction Services In 2004, Kansas City had an outdated regional plan and an inconsistent regional vision. Many people outside the region did not have a clear view of Kansas City, and few site selectors included the region on their short lists. In response, the Kansas City Area Development Council (KCADC) launched a three -part marketing campaign aimed at unifying the two- state, 18 -county region. The efforts included a campaign to promote the city to site selectors, a grassroots marketing effort aimed at unifying the region, and an effort to attract young professionals to the area. Area leaders also signed a "Declaration of Interdependence" to help unify the region. Best practice regional economic KCADC's efforts helped attract 24 companies to Kansas development organizations serve City in 2007, with most falling into its Smart Port or Animal as the primary contact for site se- Health Initiativesxx_x. lectors and businesses looking to • The vision helps unite previously disparate communities. As one economic Exhibit 7 MINNESOTA HAS RELATIVELY HIGH R&D SPENDING AND OUTPUT development director explained, "Economies do not operate within political boundaries ... A company relocating to one community from outside the region _ D , state by state, 2005 ; , patents, 2008 d per benefits all other communities." As such, a vision helps divert energies from R&D intra- regional relocations and toward more beneficial regional programs. Intensity National Federal Business rank rank Finally, as another economic development director indicated, "IA regional] spending' spending focus makes it easy for the customer." Companies and site selectors find it Maryland 1.7 �5.8 2 - 22 easier to deal with a regional entity rather than multiple municipalities vying Washington 0 4.4 7 635 3 for their attention. As noted previously, the Minneapolis -St. Paul area does California 0.4.0 9 04 4 not have a regional vision for economic development but rather many distinct, r---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -1 relatively uncoordinated efforts. I Minnesota 0.1 t 3.1 t--- 12 550 7 - - --- -- -- -- Colorado 0.1 2.7 15 378 11 Retention Services Illinois 0 2.3 19 278 18 North Carolina 0.1 21 24 234 23 Most successful economic development regions create a single organization to Ohio 0.2 ® 1.9 26 275 19 engage in the core activities of attracting and retaining businesses and marketing the region in and out of state. Texas 0.1 1.6 30 254 21 A Retention and expansion services include local business checkups, connecting U.B. Average: 303 businesses to state and local resources, and serving as a project manager for 1 Total R &D performed in state /total GDP business expansion. Run well, retention efforts make businesses more willing to 2 Includes federal funding, federally- funded research and development centers, and nonprofit research expand and create jobs in the area. SOURCE: National Science Foundation: US Patent and Trademark Office; Census 2008 The University of Minnesota is an important asset to the region, ranked in the top quartile in terms of academic article output per million dollars of academic R &D. The National Science Foundation ranked the University of Minnesota ninth among public universities for R &D expenditures."" According to Essential Science Indicators, the University has three fields of research ranked among the top five programs at public universities: mathematics (2), chemistry (3) and environment /ecology (4). Another 12 programs rank in the top 10, giving the University a total of 15 top-10 programs at public universities in the 19 general fields included in the citation database.-"i" Furthermore, in recent years, the University has strengthened its research commercialization efforts through the Technology Transfer Office, aligned with a previous Itasca Project task force. In 2009, the University earned $95 million in licensing revenue, second among public universities. Grow Minnesota!, organized by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, is an impor- tant business retention program for the region. It uses local chambers of commerce to conduct site visits at local busi- nesses and records findings on a CASE STtJD1t-'S database, which help it advocate policies to aid local businesses. Kansas City Grow Minnesota! shares informa- tion gathered on visits with respec- tive local chambers who work on issues with economic development agencies. While Grow Minnesota! provides a good base, it is a state, not a regional, initiative, and it does not have full, consistent participa- tion across all regional chambers. Attraction Services In 2004, Kansas City had an outdated regional plan and an inconsistent regional vision. Many people outside the region did not have a clear view of Kansas City, and few site selectors included the region on their short lists. In response, the Kansas City Area Development Council (KCADC) launched a three -part marketing campaign aimed at unifying the two- state, 18 -county region. The efforts included a campaign to promote the city to site selectors, a grassroots marketing effort aimed at unifying the region, and an effort to attract young professionals to the area. Area leaders also signed a "Declaration of Interdependence" to help unify the region. Best practice regional economic KCADC's efforts helped attract 24 companies to Kansas development organizations serve City in 2007, with most falling into its Smart Port or Animal as the primary contact for site se- Health Initiativesxx_x. lectors and businesses looking to relocate to the region, offering one - stop -shop attraction services. The organization connects businesses to state and local resources while serving as project managers for companies throughout the process. Attracting businesses also involves branding the area in accordance with its regional vision and marketing externally to site selec- tors, companies, and potential employees and internally It takes four times to align regional stakeholders. as long to gather information on the Twin Cities on the internet than for other cities ... and that is for professional site consultants. Imagine what it is like for people with limited experience. 9' Without a single organization focused on attraction and marketing services, companies looking to relocate to the region must deal with many different economic development agencies and governmental authorities, which deters many from putting a region on their reloca- tion short lists. Minneapolis -St. Paul lacks a holistic regional attraction effort. As one site selector explained, "It takes four times as long to gather information on the Twin Cities on the internet than for other cities ... and that is for pro- fessional site consultants. Imagine what it is like for people with limited experience." As another put it, "The region has not developed a clear brand image for itself. I get piles of marketing materials every week —and nothing on the Twin Cities." Many businesses simply fail to look at the region when expand- ing or relocating. The region does conduct some marketing, of course. Positively Minnesota, a state- wide program run by DEED, showcases the state's assets to companies and site selectors. The program also assists businesses by serving as a liaison with other state agencies, and administers financing to attract and retain businesses. The Min- neapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce recently launched a website, Metromsp.org, to provide information about the region. It features a tool to help site selectors conduct real estate searches. These programs provide a base upon which to build. Metromsp.org relies on financ- ing from the entire region but needs a staff to follow up on inquiries. Positively Minnesota has had success in coordinating incentives for companies, but the effort is largely state -wide and not regionally focused. In addition, both of these organiza- tions receive less funding than competing regional organizations. The region needs an organization that acts as a central hub for economic develop- ment. The efforts underway are not heavily coordinated, do not operate under a unified vision, and have differing geographic scopes for impact. Successful eco- nomic development must include a strategy focused on the region that actively co- ordinates retention, attraction, and marketing efforts. As a local mayor stated, "The days of Minneapolis competing against St. Paul are over. We need to be competing as a region against cities in Europe and Asia." High Quality of Life Minnesotans consistently rank among the happiest and healthiest people in the country. Forbes ranked Minnesota the fifth - happiest state in 2009, and the Gallup - Healthways Well -Being index ranks the state fourth in the nation based on emotional and physical health, healthy behavior, work environment and access to resources. Many other factors contribute to this high quality of life, including strong culture and entertainment, high civic involvement, strong infrastructure, and relatively low crime rates. The Minneapolis -St. Paul region has a vibrant theater establishment, second only to New York City in theater seats per capita, and third in museums per capita`�ii. The region is renowned for its healthy, athletic culture; Men's Health ranked Minneapolis as the third - fittest city in 2009, and Minnesota tops the Gallup- Healthways physical health index. Minneapolis -St. Paul also has the nation's highest level of civic involvement, with nearly one in four citizens volunteering annuallyiK. Transportation is critical to the region's attractiveness to employers and employees, and therefore to job growth. By most infrastructure measures, Minneapolis -St. Paul rates slightly above average when compared to peer cities. Average commute times by car and by public transport are at or below the national average, for example, and the area has less traffic than many peer regions. Business and leisure travelers alike benefit from one of the most active airports in the country. More than a thousand flights per day depart from Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport, which ranks ninth nationally in number of destinations served. Maintaining this leadership in transportation infrastructure —a key to attracting employers and employees —will require careful attention and investment, as other regions are designing high - quality, livable communities with investments in transportation and implementing progressive land use policies. Finally, according to a national survey of executives and site consultants" who help corporations identify where to relocate and expand, the crime rate is the most important indicator of quality of life. Here, the region has mixed results. While overall crime rates in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region have recently crept above the national average, the incidence of violent crime still remains 14 percent below the national average. Research and Idea Generation The Minneapolis -St. Paul region has been a world leader in the generation of ideas —the base of an innovative and entrepreneurial economy. It has long relied on strong regional entities such as the University of Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic, as well as private sector research and development in medical devices and other areas. As a result, Minnesota ranks 12th in R &D intensity nationally (total R &D spending per dollar of GDP--ii). Minnesota is also one of the best - performing states in research output, far exceeding the national average in total patents awarded per capita (Exhibit 7). Exhibit 5 MINNESOTA'S BLACK STUDENTS MAY BE FALLING BEHIND Achievement score gaps between black and white fourth - graders' in 2007 Illinois Minnesota Maryland California North Carolina Washington Colorado Ohio Texas 32 31 ,9 ,9 U.S. average: 20 1 Scores taken from results of NAEP standardized tests SOURCE National Center for Education Statistics. 2007 Minnesota Illinois Maryland California Ohio North Carolina Texas Colorado Washington 33 29 28 27 j27 26 25 24 23 U.S. average: 27 Exhibit 6 DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS POINT TO A WORKFORCE SHORTFALL IN 20 YEARS SOURCE: Census Bureau. 2009 Finally, with a coordinated strategy the region can be a contender for more newjobs. As one economic development professional in a high - performing region stated, "We have been wondering when Minneapolis -St. Paul would get its act together. When it does, we know we'll need to worry." 0.24 45+ Gap as Population by age (workforce 0 (workforce Q percent of supply) demand) Gap workforce Austin 499 519 -20 2 Chicago 2,689 3,506 -817 19 Columbus 495 631 -136 15 Denver 688 898 -210 16 Minneapolis -St. Paul 876 1,199 -322 19 Sacramento 604 784 -180 19 San Diego 893 11,065 -172 12 Seattle 868 11,305 -4371, 25 Raleigh- Durham 467 545 -78 10 SOURCE: Census Bureau. 2009 Finally, with a coordinated strategy the region can be a contender for more newjobs. As one economic development professional in a high - performing region stated, "We have been wondering when Minneapolis -St. Paul would get its act together. When it does, we know we'll need to worry." CHARTING A NEW COURSE The Minneapolis -St. Paul region has extraordinary strengths in several areas that are key to robust economic development, including a strong education system, a (( I see a divide high quality labor force, excellent research capabilities, and high quality of life. between regions that execute on a coordinated regional strategic plan and regions that do not. Every year, the chasm between the haves and the have -nots widens. The Twin Cities cannot afford to be left behind." However, the region finds itself at a critical juncture. In recent years, growth in employment, wages and GDP have all fallen below national averages and significant chal- lenges lie ahead, including billion - dollar budget deficits, an increasingly global economy and a projected labor shortage. The region has some distressing weaknesses, including a very challenging business climate, declining support for entrepreneurial activity, and an uncoordinated and ineffective regional economic development strategy. As one local businessman explained, "I see a divide be- tween regions that execute on a coordinated regional strategic plan and regions that do not. Every year, the gap between the haves and the have -nots widens. The Twin Cities cannot afford to be left behind." Given research on best practices and gaps in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region's efforts, the Itasca Project Job Growth Task Force has proposed three strategic priorities for the region: • Address the cost of doing business. The business climate is a significant roadblock to those considering adding jobs in the region. The state should adopt a more competitive tax structure and ease regulatory and permitting burdens to encourage employers to keep and add to the quality jobs in the region. • Develop a regional vision, strategy, and approach for economic development. To be competitive, the Minneapolis -St. Paul region must develop a vision and strategic plan that best leverages its strengths for economic development. The region must improve its abilities to retain and expand existing companies and market itself nationally and internationally to attract new companies. • Enhance entrepreneurship and innovation. Fostering a robust culture of entrepreneurship is critical for a prosperous economy. In addition to these three priorities, the region should continue to bolster existing strengths. Since human capital may be the most important driver of job growth, we need to expand our highly educated workforce. An efficient transportation system that helps employers move goods, allows people to accessjobs, and creates quality, livable places is also critical to economic development and job growth. Exhibit 4 TWIN CITIES RESIDENTS ARE HIGHLY EDUCATED MSP Seattle Columbus, OH Denver Raleigh - Durham Sacramento Austin Baltimore San Diego Chicago U.S average: 84 5 SOURCE: U.S. Census "American Community Survey ": McKinsey analysis MSP Seattle Columbus, OH Denver Raleigh - Durham Sacramento Austin Baltimore San Diego Chicago Graduate or Bachelors professional 12 37 :12 36 li 32 :13 36 15 41 30 13 38 4 33 12 33 2 32 A U.S.advaneed dopree everapa: 27 wages, and knowledge -based jobs have been growing at a much faster rate in the U.S. than non - knowledge -based jobs. Given global trends, knowledge workers are likely to represent a large share of national employment growth in the years ahead. Other trends raise concerns about the region's ability to maintain a highly educated, high - quality workforce, however. The region faces a well- documented achievement gap between ethnic groups. The on -time graduation rate for white students is 80% compared to 47% for minority students`. On nationwide tests, Minnesota demon- strates one of the largest achievement gaps in the nation. For example, Minnesota has the third - widest gap in the country in math test scores and seventh - widest in reading test scores between black and white students (Exhibit 5)"". Given that minority populations are growing faster than the overall population, the state must close this gap to keep pace with the nation.' Meanwhile, the share of aging Minnesotans is rising faster in this state than in the country as a whole, which may lead to a significant shortfall in the labor force (Exhibit 6). To maintain our workforce and fill the shortfall, we will need to attract, develop, and retain more high - quality workers. The region does currently have a great competitive advantage when it comes to a quality workforce. However, to maintain this competitive advantage we will need to address the achievement gap and looming workforce shortage. 3 For additional information on Minnesota's education assessment, see previous Itasca Project research in "MN's Future: World -class Schools, World -class Jobs" available at www.TheltascaProject.com and "Mind the Gap" at www.mncompass.org/disparities /close- the -gap. THE REGION'S STRENGTHS Base of Large Companies The Minneapolis -St. Paul region has one of the most impressive concentrations of large public and private corporations in the country. Eighteen Fortune 500 companies have headquarters in the region, placing it third in the country in per capita terms. These firms, which generate over $400 billion in revenue per year", span a variety of sectors, from financial services (U.S. Bancorp, Ameriprise Financial, Travelers, Thrivent Financial) and retail (Target, Supervalu, Best Buy) to consumer and industrial goods (General Mills, Land O'Lakes, 3M) and healthcare (UnitedHealth Group, Medtronic). The region is also home to large private companies, led by Cargill and Carlson Companies, placing it sixth in the nation on Forbes' "Largest Private Companies" list. Other companies, though not headquartered here, have significant employment centers in the region, including Wells Fargo, Delta, and Boston Scientific. These large firms drive much of the region's employment and economic activity and its high quality of life, thanks to their contributions to our tax base and employment rate, as well as their giving to the arts, social events, and charitable organizations. Further, these large companies and others like them, along with their employees, are important customer bases for the region's small- and medium -sized companies. Ensuring that all companies, regardless of size, prosper and choose to expand here is critical to securing the region's future prosperity. Superior Human Capital The people of Minneapolis -St. Paul are among the most educated in the country. More than nine in ten of those over age 25 have a high school diploma or equivalent, the third - highest record in the country. Nearly four in ten have a bachelor's degree or higher, placing Minneapolis -St. Paul as the sixth most educated region in the countryiii (Exhibit 4). Minnesota consistently outscores other states in reading and math proficiency. For example, 28 percent more of Minnesota's fourth - graders score at or above proficiency on national math exams than the national average and 14 percent more in reading". In higher education, the Minneapolis -St. Paul region ranks ninth among metro areas on the college destinations index, most notably with the University of Minnesota ranked 22nd among the nation's public universities and Carleton College and Macalester College ranked eighth and 29th, respectively, among all liberal arts colleges by U.S. News & World Report. The area's educational resources contribute to a highly skilled workforce that has a significant proportion of workers in knowledge -based jobs —those "that require considerable judgment in the creation, use, and communication of ideas (46% of MSP workforce is comprised of knowledge workers, compared to 40% nationwide). Most knowledge workers have more education and command higher The Itasca Project Job Growth Task Force believes that by working together to better capitalize on our strengths and address our weaknesses our region could become a global magnet for investment and business expansion. To do so will require coop- erative and reinforcing activity from all sectors - business, government, academia and other nonprofit organizations. The private sector can help by leading the effort to market our region and enhance business retention and attraction. This means funding and governing a centralized economic development entity that becomes the focus for business development activities in the region. The private sector can also enhance the entrepreneurial environment in the region by partnering with the region's research powerhouse — the University of Minnesota —to improve commercialization efforts and to develop a new pipeline of entrepreneurs. The private sector can also do more to support emerging entrepreneurs and other activities that enhance the start -up culture of the region. Legislators and policy makers also play a crucial role. Meaningful improvements in the tax and regulatory environment would have a profoundly positive impact on the business climate, how the region is viewed internally and externally, and would neutralize the most potent criticism of the Minneapolis -St. Paul region. Academic institutions, foundations, and nonprofit organizations can support this ef- fort to enhance job growth by ensuring we provide a world -class education to all stu- dents in Minnesota and work to close the achievement gap. These organizations also play a critical role in supporting an entrepreneurial culture and maintaining the region's favorable quality of life. Taken together, these changes would significantly advance the profile of our region and give us a platform from which we could aggressively market ourselves around the world. We should seize these opportunities together without delay. Exhibit 3 HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION BOTH GREW FASTER THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE AND DROVE MUCH OF THE TWIN CITIES' RECENT EMPLOYMENT GROWTH - 2002.2007 Employment Difference In total 2002 -07 Net Job creation, growth CAGR employment growth vs. U.S. Twin Cities Health care 4 10 41 Accommodation 2 -2 l J Education 6 22 1_J 9 Admin support 2 -1 9 Professional services -8 7 Management 2 4 Wholesale trade 2 ! 4 Finance 3 Real estate 0 2 Other services 0 2 Entertainment a Retail trade i 1 �2 Government 0 1 Mining 1 -26 i =0 Utilities 1 Transportation 0 -9 Information -2 0 5 Construction -1 -21 Manufacturing -1 5 10 Total 1 .10 SOURCE Bureau of Economic Analysis. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Moody's Economy.com; McKinsey analysis Fortunately, at the present time, the Minneapolis -St. Paul region still boasts sturdy economic foundations and many unique strengths. Our base of large, high - performing companies, our sound quality of life, strong human capital, and productive research community all can contribute to a robust recovery. Exhibit 2 BUT EMPLOYMENT GROWTH HAS DECLINED FOR MORE THAN A DECADE Difference between Twin Cities and U.S. employment growth' 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.219 -0.4 -0.6 L 1 Three -year moving average difference between Twin Cities and the U.S., calculated by using the given year and the previous two years SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics Me Still, some sectors have added jobs in recent years (Exhibit 3). Health care and education both grew faster here than in the nation as a whole and account for the majority of the region's job growth from 2002 to 2007. While these sectors are critical to the current and future well -being of the region, the jobs created have productivity and average wages significantly below the region's average. In fact, nine out of every ten jobs created from 2002 -2007 fell into a sector with below average productivity.2i Furthermore, growth in sectors like health care and education is largely driven by demographics and requires significant government investment. Important private sector -led industries like manufacturing, construction, and information did not generate new jobs during this period. To prevent further erosion in job creation, local leaders and policy makers must acknowledge and address the many challenges impeding economic development. The cost of doing business in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region is significantly higher than in peer regions and the country as a whole; the area lacks a strong entrepreneurship culture, which dampens economic development; and our strong position in human capital is at risk. Furthermore, the region does not have a vision for economic development or an entity to execute that vision. 2 Sector defined at the 4 -digit NAIC code level. 67,000 jobs were created in sectors with below -MSP average productivity as of 2002, while only 6,000 jobs were created in sectors with above -MSP average productivity. ABOUT THIS REPORT The Itasca Project sponsored this report to better understand the region's job growth performance and to identify opportunities to increase the number and quality of jobs in the region. The Job Growth Task Force's recommendations are based on research and analysis conducted by McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm. Methodology for the project included reviewing best practices of high performing regions both domestically and internationally, analyzing public data sources, reviewing literature on economic development, and interviewing experts on the topic. The research included interviews of over 40 external experts including economic development professionals, site selectors and economists, as well as interviews of over 50 local stakeholder groups including local companies, universities, non - profit and public sector organizations. This report concludes the first phase of the project, which involved fact - finding and identifying opportunities. The second phase, which includes communications, advocating, and implementation continues. The focus of this report is on the economic health of the Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area, most often defined by the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Whenever possible, data was gathered at the MSA level. Generally, references to Minneapolis -St. Paul, the Minneapolis -St. Paul region, MSP, Twin Cities, or "the region" mean the MSA. Where MSA -level data was not available, metrics for the state of Minnesota were used. Many charts compare the Minneapolis -St. Paul region to a defined set of peer regions. Researchers chose the sets for comparison based on population, GDP per capita, education levels, and industry diversity. These are regions we will have to compete against to win more jobs. Specifically, for peer city data comparisons, the following cities were included: Austin, Baltimore, Chicago, Columbus, Denver, Raleigh- Durham, Sacramento, San Diego, and Seattle. In addition, researchers sought out many examples from other regions both domestically and internationally to highlight specific best practices. ABOUT THE ITASCA PROJECT The Itasca Project is an employer -led alliance drawn together by an interest in new and better ways to address regional issues that impact our future economic competitiveness and quality of life in the Twin Cities area. Its 50 -plus participants are primarily private- sector CEOs, public- sector leaders, and the leaders of major Minneapolis -St. Paul -based foundations. Officers INTRODUCTION For 30 years, the Minneapolis -St. Paul region has enjoyed steady economic growth, outpacing the Midwest region and the U.S. in general (Exhibit 1) in income and GDP per capita. The region owes much of its success to a highly educated, productive workforce, a quality of life that has attracted and retained talented people, and leading -edge research and innovation. GDP per capita' 55,000 CAGR 50,000 1.71% 45,000 1.82% 40,000 .... - ' 1.43% 35,000 -_.._ r 30,000 •s r ' 25,000 +►' -�.� 20.000 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 1 In 2005 dollars SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis: Economy.com Despite this history of prosperity, some troubling trends have emerged. Even before the recent global economic downturn, the region's GDP per capita growth, real income per capita, and employment growth began lagging national averages (Exhibit 2). In Forbes' "Best Places for Business and Careers" ranking, Minneapolis -St. Paul fell from 20th to 76th between 2003 and 2009. During the same period, the Milken Institute's "Best- Performing Cities" index has the region dropping from 99th to 123rd. Compounding these issues, public funding at the state and local levels is in crisis, restricting the range of solutions available to policy makers. The recent downturn has put new pressures on local community organizations such as schools, arts institutions, and non - profits, which threaten to lower the quality of life in the region. Exhibit 1 THE TWIN CITIES HAVE ENJOYED 30 YEARS OF STEADY GROWTH Chairperson Mary Brainerd, President and CEO of HealthPartners — — U.S. average Twin Cities — — • Midwest Vice - chairpersons Richard Davis, Chairman, President, and CEO, US Bancorp Real income per capital Bruce Nicholson, Chairman, President and CEO, Thrivent CAGR Financial for Lutherans 45 ,000 2.03/0 40,000 35,000 ' ' 1.85% 30,000 �• �- � � .. ' - is 1.92% 25,000 � 20,000 15,000 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 GDP per capita' 55,000 CAGR 50,000 1.71% 45,000 1.82% 40,000 .... - ' 1.43% 35,000 -_.._ r 30,000 •s r ' 25,000 +►' -�.� 20.000 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 1 In 2005 dollars SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis: Economy.com Despite this history of prosperity, some troubling trends have emerged. Even before the recent global economic downturn, the region's GDP per capita growth, real income per capita, and employment growth began lagging national averages (Exhibit 2). In Forbes' "Best Places for Business and Careers" ranking, Minneapolis -St. Paul fell from 20th to 76th between 2003 and 2009. During the same period, the Milken Institute's "Best- Performing Cities" index has the region dropping from 99th to 123rd. Compounding these issues, public funding at the state and local levels is in crisis, restricting the range of solutions available to policy makers. The recent downturn has put new pressures on local community organizations such as schools, arts institutions, and non - profits, which threaten to lower the quality of life in the region. economic development that coordinate efforts, leverage core strengths, and moderate inherent disadvantages. Regions that have made their visions of growth a reality have built new capabilities in marketing and branding and bolstered their business attraction, expansion and retention efforts. Regions across the country are taking such actions to aggressively compete to bring new jobs to their local economies. The Itasca Project Job Growth Task Force has proposed three strategic priorities for the region, informed by our research into best practices and the gaps we have identified in the region's current economic development system: 1) Address the cost of doing business 2) Develop a vision, strategy, and approach for regional economic development 3) Enhance entrepreneurship and innovation Success will require regional coordination and cooperation. Stakeholders will need to temper historic intra- region competition in order to rally around common goals and strategies. The business community, public sector, educational community, and community leaders will need to form creative partnerships that encourage and celebrate collaboration. The Itasca Project Job Growth Task Force offers its findings to the community in the interest of securing our region's economic well- being. It has defined the situation, identified challenges, and proposed a way forward. It now urges leaders across all sectors to mobilize around this issue so that our region can once again reclaim its place as one of the most prosperous economies in the nation. TASK FORCE This work was led by a task force convened by The Itasca Project. Co- chairs Ken Powell Marilyn Carlson Nelson Task Force members General Mills Carlson Andy Bessette The Travelers Companies Bob Bruininks University of Minnesota Carleen Rhodes St. Paul Foundation Cathy Schmidt Stahl Construction Chris O'Connell Medtronic Dave Mortenson Mortenson Construction Doug Baker Ecolab Elizabeth Kautz Mayor, City of Burnsville; President, US Conference of Mayors Gary Stern Federal Reserve (Retired) Glenn Nelson GDN Holdings Hussein Samatar African American Development Center Jean Taylor Taylor Corporation Jennie Carlson U.S. Bancorp Jim McCormick MNSCU John Griffith Target Jon Campbell Wells Fargo Kathee Tesija Target Kathy Tunheim Tunheim Partners Mark Eustis Fairview Health Services Michael Gorman Split Rock Partners Randy Hogan Pentair Russ Nelson Nelson, Tietz & Hoye Stan Harpstead Mayor, City of Arden Hills Yvonne Cheung Ho MEDA SOURCES i Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Moody's Economy.com, and McKinsey analysis ii Fortune magazine ( money .cnn.com /magazines /fortune) iii U.S. Census, "American Community Survey" iv Education Week "EdCounts "; National Center for Education Statistics v McKinsey Global Economics U.S. Knowledge Worker Database vi Twin Cities Compass (www.mncompass.org /education) vii National Center for Education Statistics viii Meet Minneapolis (Minneapolis.org) ix Corporation for National & Community Service; Cities Ranked & Rated x Innovata schedules via APGDAT xi Area Development annual company and site selection survey (2008) xii National Science Foundation, Census 2006 xiii National Science Foundation/ Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges (2008) xiv University of Minnesota Annual Research Report (2009) xv Milken Institute's Cost -of -Doing Business Index 2007 (Milkeninstitute.org) xvi State Business Tax Climate Index 2009 (taxfoundation.org) xvii Business Tax Index 2009 (sbecouncil.org) xviii Milken Institute 2007 Cost -of -Doing Business Index (Milkeninstitute.org) xix Tax Foundation (taxfoundation.org) xx 2008 SUTA rates by state (staffmarket.com) xxi Tax Foundation (taxfoundation.org) xxii U.S. Economic Freedom Index: 2008 Report (liberty.pacificresearch.org) xxiii Small Business Survival Index: 2008 (sbecouncil.org) xiv U.S. Census Annual Social and Economic Supplement (2007); Moody's Economy.com; McKinsey analysis xv U.S. Census, U.S. Census Annual Social and Economic Supplement; Moody's Economy.com (2007) xvi U.S. Census "Current Population Report" xvii Youreconomy.org xviii Allegheny Conference (Alleghenyconference.org) xxix Opportunity Austin (austinchamber.com) xxx Kansas City Area Development Council (thinkkc.com) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For three decades, the Minneapolis -St. Paul region's diversified, vibrant economy outpaced the nation in employment, wages, and overall GDP The region's many strengths include a highly educated workforce, an excellent quality of life, leading - edge research, and a remarkable concentration of Fortune 500 companies. During the past decade and well before the current economic downturn, however, the region has fallen behind much of the nation in terms of job growth. If this trend continues, both the economy and our quality of life will decline. The Itasca Project Job Growth Task Force was created to study factors that support job growth and identify strategies and policies the region could employ to create, attract, and retain quality jobs. Supported by research and analysis from McKinsey & Company, the task force studied the Minneapolis -St. Paul region's environment and capabilities and benchmarked them against high performing regions both in the USA and around the globe.' Key findings of the task force included: • The Minneapolis -St. Paul region boasts sturdy economic foundations and many unique strengths. Our base of large, high - performing companies, our high quality of life, strong human capital, and productive research community have been important assets for decades. These regional strengths need to be carefully nurtured and maintained to support future economic prosperity. • Several factors prevent the region from attracting, creating and retaining high - quality jobs. These include the relatively high cost of doing business in the region due to an uncompetitive tax structure, high labor costs (especially for lower- skilled workers), and burdensome regulatory mandates and processes. In addition, the region has experienced falling levels of new business creation. This is due in part to limited access to seed capital and venture capital, insufficient networking and mentoring opportunities for local entrepreneurs, and a culture that does not value entrepreneurs as strongly as other regions. Finally, the region lacks a unified vision for economic development, a coordinated strategy for driving job growth, and an entity to drive that strategy. • Other regions have overcome similar challenges with bold actions to drive job growth and economic development. While each region's solution varies depending upon its inherent strengths and weaknesses, our research reveals some common ingredients for success. In addition to enhancing or bolstering economic pillars such as human capital, infrastructure, and the business climate, regions succeed by following a strategic vision and strategies for 1 "Minneapolis -St. Paul region" generally refers to the 13 county Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). For additional information on regions that were selected for benchmarking and best practices, see page 24 (About This Report). ITASCAproject CHARTING A NEW COURSE: RESTORING JOB GROWTH IN THE MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL REGION April 2010 ITASCAproject Ll _ _ AL It t ������allllllil� i IIIIII111.