Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010-12-07_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of November 16, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 16, 2010 and Work Session of November 16, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING: 2011 Operating Budget & 2011 Levy B. PUBLIC HEARING: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING: 2011 Liquor License Fees Agenda/Edina City Council December 7, 2010 Page 2 III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. 2011 One Ton F450 Ford Truck— Park Maintenance Department B. One(1) Fire Engine /Pumper — Rosenbauer * C. Three(3) Sport Utility Support Vehicles— Fire Department IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2010 -116 Accepting Various Donations (Affirmative vote of four Council Members to approve) * B. Resolution No. 2010 -117 Regarding Flexible Benefit Plan * C. Resolution No. 2010 -118 Regarding Health Reimbursement Arrangement D. Resolution No. 2010 -119 — Year 2011 Park And Recreation Fees And Charges E. Resolution No. 2010-120 — Year 2011 Ambulance Fees F. Resolution No. 2010 - 121 —Year 2011 Miscellaneous Fees G. First Reading Ordinance No. 2010 -20 - Amending Code Section 185 Schedule A — Increasing Certain Fees (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) * H. Resolution No. 2010 -122 Authorizing Execution of DWI Enforcement Grant Program * I. Set Hearing Date (12 -21 -2010) For Planning Items: 1. Final Development Plan & Final Rezoning, YMCA — 7355 York Avenue 2. Final Development Plan, Bruce Carlson /Centennial Lakes /Whole Food, - 7401 France Avenue J. Select Date For 2011 Volunteer Recognition Reception K. Select Date For 2011 Annual Board & Commission Meeting * L. Zoning Ordinance Amendments (Council Discussion To Take Place 12- 21 -10) 1. Revised Draft Of Ordinance No. 2010 -17 Regarding Non - Conforming Buildings And Uses And Additions To Or Replacement Of Homes With A First Floor Elevation Over One Foot Above The Existing Homes First Floor Elevation 2. Revised Draft Of Ordinance No. 2010 -18 Regarding Administration And Procedures Of The Zoning Ordinance And Establishing A PUD District * M. Request for Extension of Final Development Plan With A Variance — Edina Realty Building, 3930 West 49 -1/2 Street * N. Authorize Edina Membership In HGAC Purchasing Consortium V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may a d Agenda/Edina City Council December 7, 2010 Page 3 limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, Pre -List dated November 18, 2010, TOTAL $943,238.67; and per Pre -List dated November 25, 2010, TOTAL $795,124.30; and per Pre -List dated December 2, 2010, TOTAL $760,209.94 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence * B. Receive Petition Requesting Fence Along West Side of France Avenue Over Minnehaha Creek VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Dec 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Dec 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Wed Jan 5 Interviews With Board & Commission Applicants 5:00 — 7:00 P.M. Thur Jan 6 Interviews With Board & Commission Applicants 5:00 -7:00 P.M. Tues Jan 11 Interviews With Board & Commission Applicants 5:00 — 7:00 P.M. Mon Jan 17 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jan 25 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. Tues Feb 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Feb 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Feb 21 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Feb 22 Study Session —to be determined 7:00 A.M. Tues Mar 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Mar 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Mar 22 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 16, 2010 7:06 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle approving the Council consent agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. WEBELO PACK #123 RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland recognized the attendance of Webelo Pack #123 and invited them to introduce themselves. The Council thanked Pack #123 for its help each year cleaning the 4th of July parade route. 2010 PREVENTION WORKS! CAMPAIGN PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring the weeks of November 22 through December 30, 2010 to be Prevention Works! Campaign. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, adopting a proclamation declaring the Prevention Works! Campaign in Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Kathy Iverson, Edina Chemical Health Partners, encouraged all to participate in this campaign to promote safe holiday parties and presented community readiness survey results. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1. 2010, WORK SESSION OF NOVEMBER 1. 2010, AND CANVASS OF NOVEMBER 2.2010 ELECTION RESULTS Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle approving the minutes of the regular meeting of November 1, 2010, work session of November 1, 2010, and canvass of November 2, 2010, election results. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. CITY MANAGER NEAL WELCOMED Mayor Hovland recognized and welcomed City Manager Scott Neal, noting this was his first Council meeting as the City's Manager. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION — RIDGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: NO. BA -384 - RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -115 ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Paul Pasko, SEH, reviewed the Council's past consideration of Ridge Road noting that in January of 2010, residents had petitioned for improvements. He displayed a map and described conditions of the project area. If approved, the feasibility study for Ridge Road Improvement No. BA -384 would include a reconstruct of the existing roadway, adding new colored concrete curbs, making major improvements to the storm sewer system, and minor improvement to the water and sanitary sewer system. Veronica Anderson, SEH, displayed images depicting the existing "country lane" character of this neighborhood and advised of comments received during the September 22 and October 27, 2010, neighborhood meetings to maintain that character through edge treatments. Ms. Anderson presented renderings of three options for edge treatments based on neighborhood input. Mr. Pasko recommended colored bulkhead concrete curb, as preferred by residents, north of 5200 and to maintain existing surmountable curbs south of 5200. The estimated total project cost in 2011 dollars was Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16, 2010 $25,300 for sanitary sewer, $36,500 for water main, and $443,000 for storm sewer, equaling a City share of $504,800. The street reconstruction costs of $263,200 would be assessed against benefiting property. Since surmountable curb exists south of 5200, the assessment area would be divided into two areas. The Area A assessment would be $9,800 /REU (residential equivalency unit) and the Area B assessment would be $11,000 /REU. Mr. Pasko explained that the number of Area B REU indicated in the public improvement hearing notice was $700 higher because at that time it had contained one fewer REU. Mr. Pasko presented the project schedule. The Council discussed the project and asked questions of Mr. Pasko and staff. Mr. Pasko noted the concrete would be colored throughout to minimize the appearance of chips. The Council indicated this project design was well suited to this unique area. With regard to street lighting, Mr. Pasko advised that residents would not support an additional assessment to install decorative street light poles so no lighting was included with the proposed project. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. Public Testimony Betsy Robinson, 5021 Ridge Road, addressed the Council. Joseph McErlane, 5120 Ridge Road, addressed the Council. Mary Jo Sanderson, 6519 Interlachen Boulevard, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council indicated support to maintain a standard curb height of 4 -6 inches and addressed the questions raised during public testimony. Mr. Houle advised that project specifications hold the contractor responsible should damage occur to surrounding properties or utilities, and seismic monitoring during the project could be required. He explained that in past projects the City had offered homeowners an option to have their homes inspected by an independent testing laboratory to establish preexisting conditions. The Council complimented SEH and City staff for their cooperative work with this neighborhood and design outcome for this street. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -115, ordering improvement for Ridge Road street and utility reconstruction Improvement No. BA -384. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — NEW INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED — CUCINA DEL BARRIO, 5236 FRANCE AVENUE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. City Clerk Mangen presented the application of Cucina Del Barrio, 5236 France Avenue, for a new intoxicating liquor license and Sunday on -sale liquor license. The application process and Police Department background investigation had been completed and supported a positive recommendation. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16, 2010 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving a new on -sale intoxicating liquor license and Sunday on -sale liquor license to Barrio 50th LLC, dba as Cucina Del Barrio, for the period beginning November 16, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Timothy Rooney, 21 N. Fifteenth Street, Apt. 301, Minneapolis, stated Cucina Del Barrio was a Latin street food concept with large and small plates, entrees, as well as specialty drinks. They planned to open mid - December. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — TEMPORARY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED — CHURCH OF ST. PATRICK -EDINA — 6820 ST. PATRICK LANE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Police Chief Long presented the request of the Church of St. Patrick for a temporary intoxicating liquor license for the "Evening for a Brighter Tomorrow" event on December 4, 2010, from 6:00 p.m. to midnight. He stated the request met Code requirements and recommended approval. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:02 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving a temporary intoxicating liquor license for the Church of St. Patrick's event titled "Evening for a Brighter Tomorrow" on December 4, 2010, from 6:00 p.m. to midnight. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -17 GRANTED FIRST READING - AMENDING SECTION 850 NON - CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES AND ADDITIONS TO OR REPLACEMENT OF HOMES WITH A FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OVER ONE FOOT ABOVE THE EXISTING HOMES FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Teague explained the Minnesota Supreme Court recently rejected its 20- year -old ruling of "undue hardship" for variance review. In light of that ruling, Edina was considering an ordinance amendment that would allow expansion of non - conforming structures to match existing non - conforming setbacks, rather than granting a variance, which had been the standard in Edina prior to this ruling. He reviewed variances granted during the past three years and presented the ordinance amendment to allow an addition into an existing nonconforming setback up to a maximum 200 square feet on each existing ,non- conforming level of the home, or to match the existing nonconforming square footage of the home, whichever was less. It would also require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for additions, repairs, replacement and restoration to single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing dwelling unit building. Both amendments would apply only to properties zoned R -1 and R -2. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended first reading of the ordinance amendment to Section 850. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16, 2010 The Council discussed the amendment, the importance of maintaining the "character of the neighborhood ", and a desire to assure an eight -foot ceiling height could be maintained for living spaces, (even a walkout basement) should there be groundwater issues present. Mr. Teague described available options explaining why it would be difficult to obtain a variance since it was possible to lower the basement floor to obtain an eight -foot ceiling. It was noted that in the event of a groundwater issue and variance request, proof of extenuating circumstances might require a hydrologic engineering study by a "licensed design professional." The Council requested additional information on this issue prior to second reading to assure passage of the ordinance amendment would not create unforeseen problems. The Council noted that a revision would be made to Page 2, Section B.ii., to change the word "used" to the word "constructed." Other grammatical changes were also noted. The Council acknowledged the work of the Planning Commission and staff in drafting the ordinance amendments. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. Public Testimony Connie Carrino, 4509 Garrison Lane, addressed the Council. Jeff Miller, 4509 Garrison Lane, addressed the Council. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the issues raised during public testimony and asked questions of Mr. Teague. The Council reviewed the three portals, one of which must be met, in addition to the fourth portal that must always be met for additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. The fourth portal indicated: "An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood." It was agreed that dissimilar homes were part of the evolution of the City's housing stock and while some residents had called for creation of a Design Review Board, the Council had instead regulated via code regulations on setbacks and heights. Concern was expressed with the subjective wording of the fourth portal, opportunity for an arbitrary decision, and whether it was needed given the City's massing threshold. Mr. Teague advised the fourth portal provided a tool to not allow a project that was grossly out of scale with the neighborhood. Attorney Knutson agreed that as written, the fourth portal was open ended and adding "mass, height, and scale" language would address the Council's concern. It was noted that the majority of property in Edina does not have water issues and if the fourth portal was removed, the three portals and first floor elevation needed to be more prescriptive. Council consensus was reached to retain and revise the fourth portal to add: "mass, height, and scale" language. The Council agreed the FEMA floodplain was a good reference and to add a definition of the FEMA flood floor elevation. It was also agreed that the second portal needed specificity with regard to the type of work to be done, cost for that work, and measurement by a hydrologist. The term "licensed design professional" was revised to indicate "licensed hydrologist." Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -17, amending the Zoning Ordinance concerning nonconforming buildings and uses and additions to or replacement of homes with a first floor elevation over one foot above the existing homes first floor elevation, subject to wording revisions as discussed. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16, 2010 It was agreed that since another public hearing was not held for second reading, the final revision would be available by December 7, 2010, for public review with second reading scheduled for December 21, 2010. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -18 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING SECTION 850, CONCERNING ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES AND ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Teague presented the ordinance amendment and explained the primary benefits of creating a Planned Unit District (PUD) zoning district was to allow the City more control over proposed new development to allow flexibility in certain development standards in exchange for greater standards and control. He explained the City's current tools for rezoning were to place conditions on approvals. However, as time passes, conditions could become problematic to enforce and once the site was rezoned and the final development plan approved, the underlying zoning ordinance dictated what could and could not be done. With a PUD rezoning, any conditions placed on approval were written into the Zoning Ordinance and became the regulation for that site. Mr. Teague advised that in each instance, a request for a PUD rezoning was a public policy decision by the Council to make in its legislative capacity. Mr. Teague summarized the proposed ordinance that would amend the entire administrative and procedural sections and add the PUD zoning district, reflect statutory language, and make the ordinance easier to navigate. He also provided an explanation of the proposed process to consider an ordinance text amendment. The City Council requested the definition of "text amendment" be included prior to second reading. Following discussion, the Council requested staff provide clarification on the following prior to second reading: Page 2, Point 5, clarify language so it was understood the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals was not automatically appealed. Mr. Teague explained that anyone outside of staff would be able to appeal the decision. Correct "Heritage Preservation Commission" to "Heritage Preservation Board ". Page 7, Subsection A., Purpose, remove the words "with the." Page 29, Section b.ii., considered to be superfluous and would be deleted. Page 30, Section 3.c., indicate sketch plans would be provided to the Council for informational purposes only. Page 36, Section E., refine the language regarding subjective review and delete second sentence since State action within 60 days was already referenced on Page 1. Revise language regarding traffic review to indicate "road capacities" rather than "road capability." The Council extended its appreciation to the Planning Commission and staff for its work on the proposed ordinance amendment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:26 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -18, amending the Zoning Ordinance concerning administration and procedures and establishing a PUD District, subject to wording revisions as discussed. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -19 ADOPTED — AMENDING SECTION 850, CONCERNING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Teague explained the minimum residential driveway width was 12 feet, and the ordinance amendment would recommend no minimum width. He advised that required driveway widths had been problematic in certain areas, such as the Country Club District that contained 50 -foot lots and driveway widths that averaged nine feet. The amendment would also allow pervious pavers as an acceptable driveway material and included information on the construction for that type of driveway. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:29 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, granting First and waiving Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -19, amending the Zoning Ordinance concerning driveways. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AGREEMENT 50TH AND FRANCE COMMERCIAL AREA TRIAL VALET PARKING APPROVED — NOVEMBER 17- DECEMBER 31, 2010 Mr. Houle presented the trial license agreement between the City and Tradition, a valet business to offer lunch and dinner time valet service to customers on 50th and France Avenues that would help alleviate congestion. During lunch time, valet cars would be parked in the underutilized north ramp, and during evening hours the valet cars would be parked in the underutilized south ramp. Rachel Hubbard, 50th and France Business & Professional Association, thanked Council for considering this option to relieve parking shortages and congestion. Mr. Houle explained this valet service was not exclusive to any one restaurant or store and any customer could utilize the valet service. It was noted there was no place for patrons to stand during lunch while waiting for their car to be retrieved. However, if this trial was successful the City could consider a heated bus stop type of structure. ^ $7 fee we ld be paid •e Valet parking customers would be charged a $7 fee by Traditions to offset the cost charged to the sponsoring restaurant. Staff advised that the lunch hours would be defined as 11:45 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for lunch and 5:45 p.m. to 11 p.m. for dinner. Staff would request approval of temporary valet signage from the County and temporary parking cards similar to those issued by the 501h and France Business Association would be used for valet cars. The Council discussed the agreement and suggested the hours of parking be specified in the agreement. Alan Ackerberg, with Parasole Restaurants, thanked those who had worked on this matter and encouraged Council support of a trial agreement since it would help all businesses. He stated they were pleased to initially sponsor this program, which would be available to all businesses, during a trial period through the winter months. In response to Council's questions, Ms. Hubbard stated she had not informed all of the professional offices of this option but had informed one who indicated support. It was noted that Ms. Hubbard would be responsible to educate the general public that this service was available. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16.2010 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the license agreement between the City of Edina and Tradition valet service for 50`h and France commercial area and authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign said agreement. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2011 -2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED Finance Director Wallin presented the 2011- 2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and recommended adoption. The Council asked questions of Mr. Wallin about capital expenditures and enterprise funds that were not operating profitably. A desire was expressed to schedule enterprise fund discussions much earlier in 2011, prior to CIP consideration. It was noted that future CIP years created a "placeholder" for expenditures that would again come before the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, adopting the 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Program. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -16 ADOPTED — AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BODY ART ESTABLISHMENTS Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle to waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -16, amending Chapter 7 of the Edina City Code concerning body art establishments. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. MAYOR'S EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT APPROVED Mayor Hovland explained that while he had previously informed the Council of his interest in the Intercity Leadership Conference, he had inadvertently missed requesting payment authorization prior to the Conference. He reported on the Conference, described how the City would benefit, and requested payment in the amount of $2,095 that included transportation, hotel, and meals. Mayor Hovland stated he would provide the Council with a written report, focusing on economic development opportunities and strategies. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, authorizing expenditure in the amount of $2,095 for Mayor Hovland's attendance at the 2010 Intercity Leadership Conference. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson Abstain: Hovland Motion carried. *MEMBERS TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS REAPPOINTED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle reappointing the following persons to the various City Boards, Commissions and Committees as noted for three year terms beginning 2/1/2011: Board of Appeals and Equalization Michael Friedberg Craig Johnson Gordon Tuchenhagen Community Health Committee Janet Johnson ' Mary Jo Kingston Human Rights and Relations Commission Lisa Finsness Jessica Kingston Russell Stanton Page 7 Park Board Joseph Hulbert Daniel Peterson Planning Commission Floyd Grabiel Transportation Commission Jennifer Janovy Zoning Board of Appeals Scott Davidson Bernadette Hornig Helen Winder Minutes /Edina City Council /November 16.2010 East Edina Housing Foundation Mary Kay McNee Douglas Mayo Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -114 ADOPTED — APPROVING DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -114, approving deferral of special assessments. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -88 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -88 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *2011 COUNCIL MEETING DATES AND HOLIDAYS APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle approving the 2010 Council meeting dates and holiday schedule. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF NOVEMBER 3. 2010, ACCEPTED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle accepting the November 3, 2010, Traffic Safety Report. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Brindle approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 4, 2010, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $172,059.56; Communications Fund $2,047.96; Police Special Revenue $366.00; Working Capital Fund $43,240.24; Equipment Replacement Fund $49,952.01; Art Center Fund $22,777.26; Golf Dome Fund $4,185.29; Golf Course Fund $9,102.90; Ice Arena Fund $6,412.39; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $41,877.70; Liquor Fund $162,220.19; Utility Fund $22,436.66; Storm Sewer Fund $1,000.00; PSTF Agency Fund $13,622.11; Payroll Fund $8,201.39; TOTAL 5559.501.66 and for approval of payment of claims dated November 11, 2010, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $94,226.62; Communications Fund $450.68; Working Capital Fund $46,090.23; Art Center Fund $5,523.76; Golf Dome Fund $96.43; Aquatic Center Fund $491.76; Golf Course Fund $11,923.56; Ice Arena Fund $2,123.43; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $7,320.91; Liquor Fund $218,302.58; Utility Fund $403,454.00; Storm Sewer Fund $61,766.73; PSTF Agency Fund $10,151.79; TOTAL $861.922.48: and, Credit Card Transactions dated September 28, 2010 — October 25, 2010; TOTAL $7,068.59. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. STUDY SESSION CANCELLED Council consensus was reached to cancel the November 23, 2010, study session. SIDEWALK FEASIBILITY REPORT REQUESTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, directing engineering staff to prepare a sidewalk feasibility report for the north side of School Road from Concord to 60th Avenues to create a safe route to Concord Elementary School. Page 8 MinutWtdina Citv Council/ November 16.2010 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 7, 2010. James B.. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 16, 2010, meeting available. Page 9 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 16, 2010 4:35 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 4:35 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Planning Commissioner Chair Fischer joined the meeting for the discussion of the proposed ordinance amendments. Staff attending the meeting included: Scott Neal, City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Sheri €Rgehman, GemmunRty Health Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works, 3e #i ^, Pe "ci^ Chief-; jehn KepFi P a Q. nn«r-rnati en D; ireeter; Steve �irfhrr,ap, Chief ef , G #Ti c �,l; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; MaFty Sehee.e., FiFe chief; Matt Sisteffman, I T D1FeetG+,: Cary Teague; Planning Director; John Wallin, Finance Director; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the meeting was to continue discussion of the 2011 Operating Budget and to review proposed amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance. Finance Director Wallin handed out a request for contribution from the Southwest LRT to assist with staffing of the Steering Committee. It was noted the contribution was based upon population with the suggested contribution for Edina being $3,500.00. During discussion concerns included: why had Edina been requested to contribute when the proposed LRT route would not connect to Edina and what would the public purpose of City participation be to the residents of Edina. Possible benefits included the potential for transit - related development being realized. Staff noted that there could be some enhanced walkability for northwest Edina, there was potential for access to Park and Ride facilities and possible facilities such as the Golden Triangle may be located close by without dissecting Edina. A request was made for a list or report of the organizations to which the city belonged with the value equated with each membership. Following discussion, consensus was to fund the contribution for one year with the expense off -set by delaying filling potential open staff positions. The Council also discussed requests from the Energy & Environment Commission for funding to purchase software. Staff concerns were expressed about the cost /benefit to the City versus the staff time to populate the data. Joint meetings would aid in getting greater detail for potential projects. Member Brindle noted the need for the Human Rights and Relations Commission to reallocate the Human Services portion of their budget to ensure complete funding for the Edina Resource Center. Staff was directed to relay the request to the Human Rights and Relations Commission to re- allocate the funds within the Human Services portion of their budget as they deem appropriate. Status of the labor contracts and negotiations was briefly discussed. Planning Director Teague introduced Planning Commission Chair Fischer who reviewed for Council three proposed amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance. The amendments included: a change to the width and material requirements for driveways. He said the recommendation was to eliminate the minimum driveway width requirement in the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts and to allow pervious pavers as acceptable driveway materials. Next, Chair Fischer reviewed the proposed Planning Unit Development (PUD) zoning amendment. He noted the establishment of the PUD would entail some changes to existing administration and procedures for variances and appeals, rezoning, transfer to planned districts and conditional use permits. Minutes — Work Session /Edina City Council /November 16, 2010 There would be two primary benefits to a PUD: the City of Edina would have more control over proposed new development. Secondly under a PUD, the specific use proposed becomes the zoning of the property, and specific conditions placed on the property are enforceable; and it would allow flexibility in certain development standards in exchange for greater standards and control over development. Adoption of the PUD would require some procedural changes to the administrative portion of the zoning ordinance as well. The third amendment reviewed was the non - conforming use /alternative setback standard amendment. The proposed ordinance would allow building additions into existing non - conforming setbacks up to a maximum of 200 square feet on each existing level of the home, or up to the existing square of the existing home, whichever is less. This would only apply to properties in the R -1 or R -2 districts. The amendment would require a conditional use permit for additions, repairs, replacement and restoration to single dwelling unit buildings with a first -floor elevation of more than one -foot above the existing dwelling unit building also applied to properties zoned R -1 or R -2. The council discussed the various amendments, suggested draft language revisions and expressed concerns with impact of the amendments. The Council will hold the public hearing on the first reading of the proposed amendments at their regular meeting on November 16, 2010. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 16, 2010 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 2 o1Le • ice✓ . & \`O1ies REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II. A. From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director F-1 Action ® Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: 2011 Operating Budget & 2011 Levy ACTION REQUESTED: Hold a public hearing on December 7, 2010 to discuss the 2011 proposed budget. The final budget will be adopted during the December 21, 2010 Council meeting. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on the proposed budget during a regularly scheduled Council meeting. Council and staff have discussed the 2011 proposed budget at several worksessions throughout the summer and fall. On September 7, 2010, Council adopted a preliminary levy that would have increased the total of all City levies by 2.3 %. This preliminary levy was certified to the County as a maximum preliminary levy and the County calculated parcel- specific notices for all properties based on this preliminary levy. Since then, estimated costs for 2011 have become somewhat clearer so that the budget discussed by Council and staff at the November 1, 2010 worksession resulted in a proposed 1.15% increase in the total of all City levies for 2011. At the November 1 and November 16 worksessions, Council suggested several additional changes to the budget. None of these changes has any effect on the proposed levies. The Building department also has suggested a change to the proposed budget due to an improved outlook for permit activity. This change increases PT Inspections staff expenditures and also increases expected permit revenue by an equal amount, so the levies are not affected by this change either. A copy of the November 1 version of the proposed budget is available on the City's website for public review. ATTACHMENTS: I have attached copies of all the pages in the proposed budget that have been changed since the copy that was distributed to Council for the November 1 worksessions. Please discard the old pages from that version and replace with the updated pages. Also attached is a copy of a handout that will be available to the public prior to the public hearing. This handout is one we have used for several years to attempt to explain frequently asked questions about the City's budget, levies, and property taxes in Minnesota. `, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA O� e '. Y 'u 0 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES �3':341Y'e M ANNUAL BUDGET Property Tax Levies — All Funds Total Property Tax Levy Increase 3.419/6 4.990/6 6.85% 5.540/6 1.15% Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE r 3.48% 5.18% 7.01% 5.68% 1.12% NOTE 1: Prior to 2010, the Equipment Replacement program was budgeted for in the General Fund. The Equipment Replacement program was moved to the Construction Fund for the 2010 budget year, meaning the levy also had to be moved. NOTE 2: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station and public works levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from this calculation, which results in different values. - 11 - 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy $18,167,240 $19,029,765 $20,193,052 $20,737,472 $21,004,000 Equipment Levy NOTE 1 1,260,650 1,284,639 1,009,639 General Fund Subtotal 19,427,890 20,314,404 21,202,691 20,737,472 21,004,000 Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 1,080,100 1,040,186 1,040,436 1,039,561 949,850 Equipment Certificates - - 84,191 164,010 164,010 Gymnasium Debt Service 417,400 200,000 180,000 381,793 396,444 Fire Station Debt Service - 455,641 457,950 454,591 431,544 Public Works Facility Debt Service - - 588,453 1,172,802 1,232,460 Park Bond Market Value Levy 605,138 595,438 600,212 602,250 615,837 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 2,102,638 2,291,265 2,951,242 3,815,007 3,790,145 Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy NOTE ' - - - 940,494 992,072 Construction Fund Subtotal 940,494 992,072 Total Property Tax Levy $21,530,528 $22,605,669 $24,153,933 $25,492,973 $25,786,217 General + Equipment Levy Increase 4.68% 4.56% 4.37% 2.24% 1.47% Debt Levy Increase (Decrease) -6.96% 8.97% 28.80% 29.27% -0.65% Total Property Tax Levy Increase 3.419/6 4.990/6 6.85% 5.540/6 1.15% Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE r 3.48% 5.18% 7.01% 5.68% 1.12% NOTE 1: Prior to 2010, the Equipment Replacement program was budgeted for in the General Fund. The Equipment Replacement program was moved to the Construction Fund for the 2010 budget year, meaning the levy also had to be moved. NOTE 2: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station and public works levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from this calculation, which results in different values. - 11 - 9` A CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Budget Summary — All Funds 2011 Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 25,888,328 $ $ 25,888,328 Reductions (627,283) (627,283) Net tax revenue 25,261,045 25,261,045 Tax increments 3,972,190 3,972,190 Special assessments 2,214,358 2,214,358 Franchise fees 650,000 650,000 Licenses and permits 2,309,490 2,309,490 Intergovernmental 5,513,063 110,000 5,623,063 Fees and charges 2,733,804 2,733,804 Fines and forfeitures 1,027,103 - 1,027,103 Operating revenue - 37,447,392 37,447,392 Investment income 399,330 198,000 597,330 Other revenue 412,500 22,000 434,500 Transfers 1,949,459 938,000 2,887,459 Debt issued 5,807,000 5,807,000 Other financing sources 55,000 55,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 52,304,342 $ 38,715,392 $ 91,019,734 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General government $ 10,238,202 $ $ 10,238,202 Public works 17,339,068 17,339,068 Public safety 15,005,772 15,005,772 Parks & recreation 4,555,913 4,555,913 Debt service 6,742,299 6,742,299 Utilities 13,225,463 13,225,463 Liquor 12,338,481 12,338,481 Aquatic center 761,098 761,098 Golf course 3,572,216 3,572,216 Community activity centers - 4,886,142 4,886,142 Transfers 1,532,359 1,355,100 2,887,459 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 55,413,613 $ 36,138,500 $ 91,552,113 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ - $ 10,661,958 $ 10,661,958 Personal services 20,378,181 7,390,473 27,768,654 Contractual services 5,151,263 9,357,175 14,508,438 Commodities 1,612,196 1,949,184 3,561,380 Central services 3,285,504 1,087,920 4,373,424 Equipment 927,587 - 927,587 Capital outlay 15,784,224 - 15,784,224 Depreciation - 3,039,840 3,039,840 Debt service 6,742,299 1,296,850 8,039,149 Other - - - Transfers 1,532,359 1,355,100 2,887,459 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER $ 55,413,613 $ 36,138,500 $ 91,552,113 FINANCING USES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET ASSETS $ (3,109,271) $ 2,576,892 $ (532,379) -12- y���1�• CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA a BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Budget Summary - Governmental Funds EXPENDITURES AND OTHER 2011 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Comm- Braemar Debt General government $ 4,464,199 General HRA CDBG unication Police SR Memorial Service Construction Public works 6,226,108 Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER - 141,592 722,587 15,005,772 Parks 8 recreation 3,856,413 FINANCING SOURCES - - 7,500 692,000 4,555,913 Debt service Property tax levy $21,004,000 $ $ $ $ Transfers $ $ 3,892,256 $ 992,072 $25,888,328 Reductions (315,000) 1,532,359 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND - (312,283) (627,283) Net tax re%enue 20,689,000 OTHER FINANCING USES $28,688,313 $ 5,629,304 $ 161,303 $ 3,892,256 679,789 25,261,045 Tax increments EXPENDITURES AND OTHER 3,972,190 - - - 3,972,190 Special assessments - 1,817,069 397,289 2,214,358 Franchise fees $ 20,771 $ 10,484 $ 650,000 - $ - $ - $ - - 650,000 Licenses and permits 2,309,490 326,070 - 5,151,263 Commodities - 2,309,490 Intergmemmental 757,000 2,133 161,303 104,760 Central services 3,224,292 4,490,000 5,513,063 Fees and charges 2,733,804 - - - - - 2,733,804 Fines and forfeitures 975,000 927,587 - 52,103 4,000,000 - 1,027,103 Investment income 115,919 122,000 24,000 600 300 33,900 102,611 399,330 Other revenue 343,000 66,500 - 3,000 - - 412,500 Transfers 765,100 - - 934,359 00 250,0 1,949,459 Debt issued - 161,303 $ - 141,592 $ 7,500 $ 6,742,299 $13,235,547 - 5,807,000 5,807,000 Other financing sauces - $ (67,255) $ 15,871 $ (4,200) $ (64,715) $ (1,453,858) $ (3,109,271) 55,000 55,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $28,688,313 $ 4,094,190 $ 161,303 $ 740,500 $ 157,463 $ 3,300 $ 6,677,584 $11,781,689 $52,304,342 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General government $ 4,464,199 $ 4,694,945 $ 161,303 $ 807,755 $ $ $ $ 110,000 $10,238,202 Public works 6,226,108 - - 11,112,960 17,339,068 Public safety 14,141,593 - 141,592 722,587 15,005,772 Parks 8 recreation 3,856,413 - - 7,500 692,000 4,555,913 Debt service - 6,742,299 - 6,742,299 Transfers 934,359 - 598,000 1,532,359 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $28,688,313 $ 5,629,304 $ 161,303 $ 807,755 $ 141,592 $ 7,500 $ 6,742,299 $13,235,547 $55,413,613 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $19,978,953 $ 20,771 $ 10,484 $ 367,973 $ - $ - $ - $ $20,378,181 Contractual seNces 3,913,505 674,174 150,819 326,070 86,695 5,151,263 Commodities 1,571,563 - - 38,500 2,133 1,612,196 Central services 3,224,292 61,212 - 3,285,504 Equipment - - - - 927,587 927,587 Capital outlay 4,000,000 14,000 52,764 7,500 - 11,709,960 15,784,224 Debt service - - - - 6,742,299 - 6,742,299 Transfers 934,359 - 598,000 1,532,359 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $28,686,313 $ 5,629,304 $ 161,303 $ 807,755 $ 141,592 $ 7,500 $ 6,742,299 $13,235,547 $55,413,613 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ - $ (1,535,114) $ - $ (67,255) $ 15,871 $ (4,200) $ (64,715) $ (1,453,858) $ (3,109,271) -13- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA V BUDGET SUMMARY e rs` ANNUAL BUDGET Budget Summary - Enterprise Funds 2011 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS Aquatic Golf Art Edlnborough Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Center Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERSIN Operating revenues $15,803,920 $13,367,072 $ 818,800 $ 3,793,300 $ 1,443,800 $ 478,000 $ 1,742,500 $37,447,392 Intergovernmental 110,000 - - - 110,000 Investment income 100,000 - 98,000 198,000 Other revenue - - - 22,000 - 22,000 Transfers 100,000 365,000 182,000 291,000 938,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $16,013,920 $13,367,072 $ 818,800 $ 3,893,300 $ 1,808,800 $ 682,000 $ 2,131,500 $38,715,392 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities $13,225,463 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $13,225,463 Liquor 12,338,481 - 12,338,481 Aquatic center - 761,098 761,098 Golf course - 3,572,216 3,572,216 Community activity centers - - 1,782,952 699,188 2,404,002 4,886,142 Transfers 100,000 1,255,100 - - 1,355,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,325,463 $13,593,581 $ 761,098 $ 3,572,216 $ 1,782,952 $ 699,188 $ 2,404,002 $36,138,500 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ 45,000 $10,103,558 $ 37,600 $ 356,300 $ 1,500 $ 24,000 $ 94,000 $10,661,958 Personal services 1,725,287 1,406,312 302,034 1,714,038 653,340 273,882 1,315,580 7,390,473 Contractual services 6,890,036 474,989 107,200 570,550 574,600 281,750 458,050 9,357,175 Commodities 1,040,500 64,834 76,350 351,200 85,500 53,200 277,600 1,949,184 Central services 539,640 206,448 23,364 137,928 42,912 38,856 98,772 1,087,920 Depreciation 1,805,000 82,340 198,000 427,000 340,000 27,500 160,000 3,039,840 Interest 1,180,000 - 16,550 15,200 85,100 - - 1,296,850 Other - - - - - - Transfers 100,000 1,255,100 - - 1,355,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,325,463 $13,593,581 $ 761,098 $ 3,572,216 $ 1,782,952 $ 699,188 $ 2,404,002 $36,138,500 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 2,688,457 $ (226,509) $ 57,702 $ 321,084 $ 25,848 $ (17,188) $ (272,502) $ 2,576,892 -14- ,, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA r� e 3 4 BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Overview The budget summary on the previous 3 pages includes revenues and other financing sources of $91,019,734. Since 2011 is the first year many of our funds have been included in the budget, there is no corresponding 2010 figure for comparison. This budget is "balanced" according to our operating budget policies because General fund revenues are equal to expenditures. Revenues and Other Financing Sources Total revenues and other financing sources are expected to be over $90 million in 2011. The largest single source of revenue is property taxes, accounting for 28% of the citywide revenue budget. The General Fund levies property taxes to support governmental operations (public safety, parks, public works, etc.), the Debt Service Fund levies property taxes to make principal and interest payments on debt issued in prior years, and the Construction Fund levies property taxes for the Equipment Replacement Program. All enterprise operating revenues combined are expected to be $37,447,392, or 41 % of citywide revenue, although these revenues come from a variety of different sources. For instance, this category includes water sales from our Utility enterprise, liquor sales from our Liquor enterprise, and class registration revenue from our Art enterprise. Expenditures, Expenses and Other Financing Uses Total expenditures and other financing uses are expected to total $91,552,113 in 2011. Since revenues are expected to be less, this expenditure level assumes a $532,379 use of existing fund balance and /or net assets. The largest uses of fund balance occur in the HRA and Construction funds, and are related to large construction projects that may occur in 2011. These uses are mostly offset by an increase in Utility fund net assets, which is necessary according to the last rate study commissioned for the 2010 budget year. The largest expenditures /expenses by function are for public works and public safety at 18.9% and 16.4% of total expenditures /expenses, respectively. The next largest categories are utility and liquor expenses, although these are offset by revenues because they are related to enterprise funds. The largest expenditure /expense by type is for personal services, at $27,768,654, or 30.3% of the overall expenditure /expense budget. This level of salary expenditures /expenses assumes a 1% cumulative increase in employee salaries from actual 2009 levels. The actual increase will likely be determined in part by an arbitrator because there are currently no labor contracts in place for 2010 or 2011. Several other aspects of the labor contracts that could impact the 2011 budget are also uncertain, including City contributions to employee health insurance. Once the actual cost of living and other factors are known, an updated budget or budget amendment (if arbitrator awards and /or settlements are announced after formal adoption of the 2011 budget) may be necessary. There are no new full -time positions budgeted for 2011. -15- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA " DEBT SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Debt Summary —All Funds (In Thousands) This graph includes estimates for bonds that may be issued in future years. Of the bond types shown here, only General Obligation and Public Project bonds are payable solely from general property taxes, and therefore are responsible for the "Debt Service" portion of the levy included in this budget. The other bond types are payable from other revenue sources, including water and sewer revenues, special assessments, golf course green fees, tax increments and others. Due in part to its relatively low level of General Obligation and Public Project debt outstanding, the City maintains the highest "Aaa" and "AAA" ratings from Moody's and Standard and Poors, respectively. The City's overall debt levels have been increasing since 2006. The City's infrastructure is aging and we are repairing streets, water and sewer pipes and other infrastructure on an aggressive schedule that is requiring us to issue new debt. In addition, the construction of a new city hall, two gymnasiums, major renovations of fire station #1, and relocation of the City's public works facility in recent years have also required new debt issues. Despite these pressures, the City's debt is still manageable and is not expected to be a burden when planning future budgets. -16- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA �e`'` GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET General Fund Revenues and Other Financing Sources 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 General Fund Revenues by Category ,�`Ge&Q�� ��F �s ec �es es e � C e&ko � ,469 eO \1`e The main source of revenue in the General Fund is property taxes, accounting for 72% of General Fund revenue. The General Fund tax levy increased 1.3% from 2010, but the City expects to receive 2.8% more revenue. This is due to decreased expectations for delinquencies, abatements and other losses as the economy appears to be stabilizing. Building permit revenue, which is part of the licenses and permits category, appears to have peaked in 2006 and decreased through 2009. We are projecting a slight rebound in 2010 and 2011 from the 2009 lows, although it may take years to return to the 2006 permit revenue amounts. Ambulance revenue, which is part of the fees and charges category, also appears to be leveling off despite high numbers of patients transported and rapidly rising rates. The City accepts Medicare assignment, which means that we are subject to Medicare reimbursement rates for all Medicare patients. These reimbursement rates are very low and haven't been increasing as quickly as costs to operate an ambulance service have. Other revenue includes investment income and other miscellaneous revenue. Investment income was very low starting in 2009 and is expected to continue through 2011 due to low interest rates. The other financing sources category includes transfers from the Liquor Fund, which will not be increasing in 2011. -17- A : CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET General Fund Expenditures and Other Financing Uses Budgeted expenditures in the General Fund will increase 2.6% from 2010. Nearly half of the General Fund's $28,668,313 expenditure budget is spent on Public Safety. Public Safety includes the Police, Fire, Health and Inspections Department. General Fund Expenditures by Function 16,000,000 14,000,000 02010 12,000,000 10,000,000 o2011 8,000, 000 6,000, 000 4,000, 000 2,000, 000 General Public Works Public Safety Parks and Government Recreation 70% of General Fund expenditures are for personal services, including over $11 million for Public Safety personal services. -18- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA •::,, ,,.;• GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET General Fund Balance General Fund balance is considered an important indicator of a local government's financial health. Fund balance may be used to cover revenue shortfalls or unanticipated expenditures and can help to stabilize property taxes. The City has adopted a fund balance policy to guide decision - making about what appropriate fund balance levels are and how to allocate them. In Minnesota, cities generally must wait six months after year -end to receive the first full property tax settlement from the county. For this reason, the City's current fund balance policy recommends year -end fund balance designated for cash flows equal to 42147% of the subsequent years budgeted tax revenue. 50.0% 9,000,000 7,000,000 45.0% 0000 F-1 5,000,000 40.0% 3,000,000 1,000,000 35.0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated Proposed oFund Balance for Cash Flow —8—Ratio The graph on this page shows that the while the City's General Fund balance has grown most every year since 2005, it has remained relatively stable when expressed as a percentage of subsequent year's tax revenue and very close to the 42147% guideline, even though the fund balance policy wasn't formally implemented until 2006. Although it is too early to know actual results for 2010, the City's estimates show little change in the dollar amount designated for cash flow, which would still provide reserves sufficient to meet our fund balance policy guidelines. The 2011 budget is balanced and therefore calls for no dollar change in General Fund balance or fund balance designated for cash flow. However, because projected property tax revenue is expected to rise each year, the percentage drops slightly. Despite the decrease, the City believes that these fund balance levels will be adequate and within the policy guidelines of 42 to 47 percent. -19- CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 20 FUND: GENERAL I REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL. ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED TAXES: PROPERTY TAXES $18,683,180 $19,712,348 $20,737,472 $20,737,472 $21,004,000 PENALTIES AND INTEREST 15,476 20,180 12,000 12,000 12,000 LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS - - 340,000 634,124 327,000 18,698,656 19,732,528 20,409,472 20,115,348 20,689,000 TOTAL TAXES LICENSE AND PERMITS: HEAT/VENT LICENSE 35,379 26,235 30,000 30,000 30,000 BUILDING PERMITS 1,873,338 1,217,654 1,400,000 1,380,000 1,421,990 PLUMBING PERMITS 145,760 124,114 135,000 130,000 130,000 HEATING PERMITS - 23,360 18,000 - 10,000 MECHANICAL PERMITS 379,474 264,097 275,000 250,000 270,000 GRADING /EXCAVATION PERMITS 2,826 5,192 2,500 2,000 2,500 DOG LICENSES 32,528 40,535 50,000 27,500 35,000 BEER LICENSE 10,336 10,642 12,360 12,360 12,000 WINE LICENSE 22,000 15,075 20,000 27,800 25,000 LIQUOR LICENSE 144,283 145,083 150,000 135,000 142,000 PARKING RAMP 3,375 3,375 3,300 3,300 3,300 OTHER PERMITS & LICENSES 7,363 7,386 3,000 3,000 3,000 SPRINKLER PERMITS 34,261 23,017 30,000 30,000 30,000 ALARM PERMITS 25,566 11,509 14,500 14,500 14,500 TOBACCO LICENSE 10,945 5,600 8,000 10,250 10,000 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE 92,862 96,472 100,000 93,000 95,000 FOOD VENDING LICENSE 1,110 1,125 2,000 2,000 1,500 POOL LICENSE 22,050 26,052 23,500 23,500 24,000 AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE 1,620 1,695 1,500 2,000 1,500 LODGING LICENSE 1,575 931 1,000 1,000 1,000 GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSE 14,485 11,435 13,000 13,000 13,000 PARKING GARAGE LICENSE 3,240 4,005 3,200 3,200 3,200 SIGN PERMIT 9,605 11,730 15,000 9,500 11,000 ROAD RESTRICTION PERMITS 11,800 4,820 10,000 28,850 20,000 2,885,781 2,081,139 2,320,860 2,231,760 2,309,490 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID: FEDERAL AID 18,937 104,906 36,000 36,000 36,000 STATE AID MAINTENANCE 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 OTHER STATE AID 148,321 126,973 100,000 51,000 51,000 STATE POLICE AID 342,661 338,684 355,000 355,000 355,000 STATE HEALTH AID 120,130 119,086 120,000 120,000 120,000 825,049 884,649 806,000 757,000 757,000 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENT AID CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 21 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED FEES AND CHARGES: BUILDING DEPARTMENT $ 8,761 $ 29,132 $ 30,000 $ 5,400 $ 25,000 CITY CLERK 110,936 8,862 100,000 6,000 6,000 FIRE DEPARTMENT 21,975 31,237 30,000 30,000 30,000 AMBULANCE 1,522,637 1,556,146 1,545,000 1,545,000 1,545,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 344,171 172,878 175,000 201,000 200,000 ENGINEERING 274,965 210,071 170,000 170,000 180,000 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 7,080 6,580 9,000 7,700 7,700 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43,290 16,536 27,500 27,500 27,500 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT 30,533 37,870 25,000 25,000 26,000 SERVICES HRA 32,122 28,377 21,500 21,500 22,000 PARK REGISTRATION FEES 98,026 103,530 100,000 96,000 98,000 SENIOR CENTER FEES 99,259 94,525 95,000 100,000 98,000 OTHER FEES 2,998 1,540 5,000 5,000 4,000 50TH & FRANCE ASSESSMENT 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS 374,088 392,880 393,168 393,168 395,604 3,039,841 2,759,164 2,795,168 2,702,268 2,733,804 TOTAL FEES AND CHARGES FINES AND FORFEITURES: MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 968,893 1,148,440 1,100,000 950,000 975,000 OTHER REVENUES: INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 260,249 37,668 109,382 109,382 115,919 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 129,302 191,136 195,000 195,000 200,000 PARK RENTAL 125,135 151,310 120,000 120,000 125,000 DONATIONS 13,171 28,367 11,000 11,000 12,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 5,562 15,039 6,000 6,000 6,000 533,419 423,520 441,382 441,382 458,919 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $26,951,639 $27,029,440 $27,872,882 $27,197,758 $27,923,213 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM LIQUOR 742,800 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 742,800 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $27,694,439 $27,794,540 $28,637,982 $27,962,858 $28,688,313 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 22 FUND: GENERAL I EXPENDITURE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL FUND: GENERAL GOVERNMENT: MAYOR & COUNCIL $ 84,137 $ 83,051 $ 86,323 $ 88,323 $ 89,439 ADMINISTRATION 1,008,641 1,058,779 1,078,632 1,096,852 1,152,578 PLANNING 442,344 446,818 457,937 457,937 477,791 FINANCE 661,276 661,888 677,427 681,057 695,644 ELECTIONS 281,914 135,824 296,277 200,181 209,710 ASSESSING 804,589 799,777 818,816 842,228 853,189 LEGAL & COURT SERVICES 321,149 339,744 363,300 381,800 388,000 COMMISSIONS & PROJECTS 380,961 481,500 725,438 575,238 597,848 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 3,985,011 $ 4,007,381 $ 4,504,150 $ 4,323,616 $ 4,464,199 PUBLIC WORKS: ADMINISTRATION $ 201,178 $ 195,897 $ 219,154 $ 219,154 $ 228,954 ENGINEERING 1,085,291 1,033,268 1,026,803 1,026,803 1,052,245 STREET MAINTENANCE 4,559,287 4,368,099 4,436,292 4,771,899 4,944,909 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS $ 5,845,756 $ 5,597,264 $ 5,682,249 $ 6,017,856 $ 6,226,108 PUBLIC SAFETY: POLICE PROTECTION $ 7,616,949 $ 7,508,421 $ 7,777,817 $ 7,804,861 $ 7,924,774 CIVILIAN DEFENSE 55,933 54,890 57,654 57,654 56,530 ANIMAL CONTROL 86,710 89,955 88,347 88,347 91,981 FIRE PROTECTION 4,331,706 4,312,002 4,398,678 4,383,678 4,467,214 PUBLIC HEALTH 462,680 482,446 495,192 498,117 511,602 INSPECTIONS 1,085,481 994,324 975,157 1,033,256 1,089,492 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $13,639,459 $13,442,038 $13,792,845 $13,865,913 $14,141,593 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-23 FUND: GENERAL I EXPENDITURE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PARK & RECREATION: ADMINISTRATION $ 713,048 $ 713,133 $ 729,904 $ 759,525 $ 779,416 RECREATION 362,822 377,235 395,772 412,804 420,702 MAINTENANCE 2,529,196 2,479,287 2,474,348 2,583,144 2,656,295 TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT $ 3,605,066 $ 3,569,655 $ 3,600,024 $ 3,755,473 $ 3,856,413 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $27,075,292 $26,616,338 $27,579,268 $27,962,858 $28,688,313 OTHER FINANCING USES: TRANSFER TO CIP 50,000 50,000 - - - TRANSFER TO OTHER 400,000 700,000 - - - 450,000 750,000 - - - TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $27,525,292 $27,366,338 $27,579,268 $27,962,858 $28,688,313 TOTAL CHANGES IN GENERAL FUND BALANCE $ 169,147 $ 428,202 $ 1,058,714 $ - $ - This page left blank intentionally. • is is CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 29 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT I MAYOR & COUNCIL 1100 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETE7 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 41,700 $ 41,700 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 41,806 6030 PENSIONS 1,303 1,661 2,800 2,800 3,031 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 2,706 2,706 3,060 3,060 3,198 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 59 83 68 68 71 45,768 46,150 45,928 45,928 48,106 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 93 715 2,000 4,000 4,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 980 1,835 1,500 1,500 1,700 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 5,180 5,555 6,355 6,355 6,400 6,253 8,105 9,855 11,855 12,100 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,181 1,214 1,200 1,200 1,225 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 12,585 11,391 11,280 11,280 9,876 6804 CITY HALL 18,350 16,191 18,060 18,060 18,132 30,935 27,582 29,340 29,340 28,008 TOTAL MAYOR & COUNCIL $ 84,137 $ 83,051 $ 86,323 $ 88,323 $ 89,439 CITY OF EDINA FUND: ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 30 I SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES I Administration -1120: Personal services consists of 8.25 full -time employees in this area. The office of the City Manager is responsible for executing the policies adopted by the City Council. Specifically, the City Manager's office provides for the general management of the City and is responsible for the following: • Personnel compensation and benefits administration for approximately 900 full -time and part - time employees • Labor relations with four organized bargaining units • Risk management • Long range planning • Maintenance of official records and minutes • Publication of ordinances and legal notices • Licensing • Policy research and implementation • Management of selected central services • Human relations • Staff service to the HRA • Employee training and career development • Facility management of City Hall Explanation of Change: . $10,000 was added to professional services for the City's participation in the Itasca Project. . $3,500 was added to professional services for the City's participation in the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee. Total Administration Budget 2010 2011 % $ 1,096,852 $ 1,152,578 5.08% • 0 • • CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-31 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT I ADMINISTRATION 1120 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 ACCT.` DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 636,943 $ 674,557 $ 670,000 $ 690,673 $ 715,916 6011 OVERTIME 9,868 10,794 10,000 5,100 8,080 6030 PENSIONS 41,682 46,112 49,257 49,257 54,193 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 45,650 48,693 50,696 50,696 52,648 6040 FLEX PLAN 54,925 54,980 76,725 76,725 79,200 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,077 2,079 2,100 1,897 2,333 791,145 837,215 858,778 874,348 912,370 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,283 27,105 24,000 24,000 38,500 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 6,683 10,380 7,500 7,500 7,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 52,948 53,328 48,000 48,000 49,000 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 982 1,382 1,500 1,500 1,500 6107 MILEAGE 14,190 14,123 10,000 10,000 10,000 6120 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS 19,216 17,019 18,000 21,000 21,000 6160 DATA PROCESSING HR 31,323 31,009 34,000 34,000 32,000 6188 TELEPHONE 577 2,256 2,500 1,200 2,500 147,202 156,602 145,500 147,200 162,000 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 141 247 1,000 1,500 1,500 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,102 519 1,000 1,500 1,500 6575 PRINTING - - 150 100 100 1,243 766 2,150 3,100 3,100 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 45,870 43,879 49,176 49,176 49,536 6804 CITY HALL 21,420 18,900 21,072 21,072 23,748 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 1,761 1,417 1,956 1,956 1,824 69,051 64,196 72,204 72,204 75,108 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 1,008,641 $ 1,058,779 $ 1,078,632 $ 1,096,852 $ 1,152,578 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 32 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I PLANNING 1140 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Planning -1140: Personal services consists of 3.85 full -time employees in this area. The Planning Department provides staff service to the City Council, the Planning Commission, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, the Heritage Preservation Board, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the East Edina Housing Foundation. The department also handles the administration of the City's sign ordinance, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, nuisance ordinance, the Metro Rental Assistance Program, the Federal Community Development Block Grant program, and East Edina Housing Foundation programs. 2010 2011 % Total Planning Budget $ 457,937 $ 477,791 4.34% • • CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 43 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: COMMISSIONS PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I & SPECIAL PROJECTS 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CONTINGENCIES -1500 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 90,328 $ 37,872 $ 200,000 $ 258,000 $ 265,000 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,757 1,680 1,990 1,990 2,000 TOTAL CONTINGENCIES $ 92,085 $ 39,552 $ 201,990 $ 259,990 $ 267,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -1503 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: 6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 30,939 $ 28,740 $ 31,500 $ 31,500 $ 32,000 TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 30,939 $ 28,740 $ 31,500 $ 31,500 $ 32,000 HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION -1504 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 100,043 $ 87,375 $ 82,498 $ 82,498 $ 79,684 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION - - 250 250 250 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 493 247 200 200 200 6136 CHEMICAL HEALTH - - 500 500 500 6218 EDUCATION PROGRAM 899 490 800 800 2,298 101,435 88,112 84,248 84,248 82,932 TOTAL HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION $ 101,435 $ 88,112 $ 84,248 $ 84,248 $ 82,932 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-44 COMMISSIONS & SUMMARY,OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Suburban Rate Authority -1506: The Suburban Rate Authority is a joint powers organization that actively intervenes in matters affecting gas, electric, and telephone rates. The Suburban Rate Authority has also been active in matters concerning uniform gas and electric franchises, gas, electric and telephone rate regulation, right -of -way issues, and in legislation concerning the Public Utilities Commission. Edina Resource Center -1507: In 2002, the City elected to withdraw from the Hennepin South Services Collaborative (HSSC) and establish a freestanding family services resource center. This resource center, named Edina Resource Center, is operated as part of the family services collaborative administered by the Edina Public Schools. This budget item constitutes the City's contribution to the operation of the Edina Resource Center. Human Services Planning and Coordination -1508: With the withdrawal from HSSC, the City's contribution to the research, planning and coordination (RPC) function of HSSC has been eliminated. This budget item will be used by the City to undertake human service planning and coordination activities on an as- needed basis. Records Management Program -1511: This includes doing an inventory and setting up a database in order to meet state data practice laws. 1 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET RAGE =45 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: COMMISSIONS. PROGRAM:, GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT &SPECIAL PROJECTS 1500 -1516 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES' 200& 2009 2011 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED. ESTIMATED BUDGETET SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY -1506 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103; PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 4,000 $ 4,000'- $ 4,000 $ 4,000' $ ' 4,000 TOTAL SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY $ 4,000 $ 4,000. $ 4,000, . $ 4,000 $ 4;000, EDINA RESOURCE CENTER -1507 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES' $ 36,113 $ 37,200 $ 37,200 $ 37,000 $ 38,316 TOTAL EDINA RESOURCE CENTER $ 36,113 $ 37,200 $ 37,200 $ 37,000 $ 38,316 HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING & COORDINATION -1508 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 11,943 $ TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES 'PLANNING & COORDINATION $ 11,943 $ - $ - $ RECORDS MANAGEMENT -1511 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - $ - $, -:, $ 8,600 $ '8,600 TOTAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ 8,600 $ 8,600 CITY OF EDINA FUND: ANNUAL BUDGET COMMISSIONS & SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Employee Programs -1513: PAGE - 46 -1516 Employee Programs is made up of three expense items; Separation Benefits, which covers vacation and sick leave payouts for employees leaving the City, Employee Recognition, which covers various programs to honor dedicated employees, and Clothing Allowance, an allotment given to City Hall employees to purchase clothing with the City logo. Dial -a -Ride Program -1514: The Edina Dial -a -Ride program provides a low cost transit alternative to Edina residents, principally senior citizens, who require transportation to the Senior Center, medical appointments, shopping and so forth. The program began in February 2001 and provides approximately 4,200 passeger rides annually. Hennepin County took the program over in 2010 so the City is no longer involved. Public Art -1515: Funding for the Public Arts program was originally described as a one -time appropriation in the 2005 budget and was discontinued for the 2006 through 2010 budget years. Public Arts funding was reinstated for the 2011 budget. Historical Society -1516: Beginning in 2008, the City will provide a stipend to the Historical Society to support their staffing and programs. 2010 2011 % Total Commissions & Special Projects $ 575,238 $ 597,848 3.93% • 1 • CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 47 FUND: FUNCTION: I AREA: COMMISSIONS PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT I & SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATE BUDGETED EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS -1513 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6035 SEPARATION BENEFITS $ 49,417 $ 213,379 $ 350,000 $ 130,000 $ 135,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 9,374 - 5,000 8,400 8,400 6203 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 2,773 2,264 2,500 2,500 2,600 6218- EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 49 1,354 4,000 4,000 4,000 12,196 3,618 11,500 14,900 15,000 TOTAL EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS $ 61,613 $ 216,997 $ 361,500 $ 144,900 $ 150,000 DIAL A RIDE -1514 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 32,833 $ 56,899 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL DIAL A RIDE $ 32,833 $ 56,899 $ - $ - $ - PUBLIC ART -1515 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 TOTAL DIAL A RIDE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 HISTORICAL SOCIETY -1516 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,500 TOTAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,500 TOTAL COMMISSIONS & SPECIAL PROJECTS $ 380,961 $ 481,500 $ 725,438 $ 575,238 $ 597,848 This page left blank intentionally. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 95 FUND: FUNCTION: FXREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC HEALTH 1490 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 190,503 $ 204,463 $ 211,411 $ 211,411 $ 220,106 6030 PENSIONS 12,111 13,596 14,987 14,987 15,958 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 14,997 15,757 16,379 16,379 16,838 6040 FLEX PLAN 24,246 23,755 24,645 24,645 25,440 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 615 787 736 736 947 242,472 258,358 268,158 268,158 279,289 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 177,909 183,933 183,706 183,706 187,380 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 1,385 980 3,000 3,000 3,000 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 250 604 800 800 800 6107 MILEAGE 6,780 6,774 4,500 6,800 6,800 6188 TELEPHONE 60 274 1,000 1,000 1,000 186,384 192,565 193,006 195,306 198,980 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 864 1,673 1,500 2,000 2,000 6575 PRINTING - - 200 325 325 864 1,673 1,700 2,325 2,325 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 19,284 18,058 18,264 18,264 17,148 6804 CITY HALL 10,514 9,278 10,344 10,344 10,380 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 3,162 2,514 3,720 3,720 3,480 32,960 29,850 32,328 32,328 31,008 TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH $ 462,680 $ 482,446 $ 495,192 $ 498,117 $ 511,602 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 96 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I INSPECTIONS 1495 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Inspections -1495: Personal services consist of the Building Official, 4.75 full -time inspectors, 1.75 full -time support staff, and 3 part-time inspectors /reviewers. The Inspections Department reviewed, issued and performed inspections for 4,909 building, plumbing and heating permits in 2009 - performing over 14,000 inspections. Staff enforces the State Building Code, which includes the International Building Code and the International Residential Code as well as applicable sections of the Edina City Code. 2009 revenue for the various permits issued was as follows: Building Permits $ 1,225,982 Plumbing Permits 147,822 HVAC Permits 263,739 The Building Department also receives 15 to 20 complaint calls per week from residents which are investigated. The department is also responsible for the review, permitting and inspection of non - public grading /fill /excavation projects. Explanation of Change: . Part-time inspection staffing level was increased to reflect expectations for increasing permit activity. Total Inspections Budget 2010 2011 % $ 1,033,256 $ 1,089,492 5.44% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 97 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PUBLIC SAFETY I INSPECTIONS 1495 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 525,927 $ 538,072 $ 540,000 $ 531,362 $ 548,750 6011 OVERTIME 10,725 2,239 2,500 5,200 5,252 6013 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 218,158 144,280 100,000 150,000 171,700 6030 PENSIONS 48,956 46,263 46,000 48,518 52,613 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 56,908 51,434 46,000 50,345 51,492 6040 FLEX PLAN 56,402 62,579 65,000 69,750 72,000 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,431 2,518 2,500 2,024 2,480 919,507 847,385 802,000 857,199 904,287 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,306 3,784 11,000 13,000 11,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 3,606 3,676 4,000 4,000 3,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 919 600 700 700 900 6107 MILEAGE 3,389 3,387 2,500 3,400 3,000 6136 PLAN MANAGEMENT 4,208 4,527 6,306 6,306 6,000 6155 BANK CHARGES 8,833 10,606 8,000 8,000 9,000 6160 DATA PROCESSING 34,391 33,398 36,759 36,759 39,589 6188 TELEPHONE 3,787 2,932 2,600 2,600 3,000 73,439 62,910 71,865 74,765 75,989 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 2,482 757 2,000 2,000 1,800 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,525 1,075 2,000 2,000 2,400 6558 UNIFORMS 1,655 2,125 2,200 2,200 2,200 6575 PRINTING 1,747 1,368 1,900 1,900 1,800 7,409 5,325 8,100 8,100 8,200 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 41,985 39,480 48,132 48,132 51,324 6804 CITY HALL 23,810 21,018, 23,424 23,424 29,472 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 19,331 18,206 21,636 21,636 20,220 85,126 78,704 93,192 93,192 101,016 TOTAL INSPECTIONS $ 1,085,481 $ 994,324 $ 975,157 $ 1,033,256 $ 1,089,492 2011 Edina City Budget Facts Q. What is the dollar amount of the proposed City expenditures, expenses and other financing uses for 2011? A. For all City funds, the total expenditures, expenses and other financing uses are $91,552,113.Total expenditures and other financing uses in the General Fund are $28,688,313. Q. How much of an increase is this from 2010? A. 2011 is the first year we have included all City funds in the budget, so there is no comparable number for all City funds. For the General Fund, the increase is $725,455 or 2.6 %. This increase comes after a $710,461 (2.5 %) decrease in General fund expenditures and other financing uses for the 2010 budget. Q. How much do tax levies need to increase from 2010 to support the 2011 City budget? A. Tax levies need to increase by $293,244 or 1.15 %. Q. What are the major categories of City Spending? A. Expenditures, expenses and other financing uses can be arranged by function or type — see charts below: 20,000,000 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 Expenditures, expenses and other financing uses by function oo "'0 yo eo`ec o oJ�ye � 5 a c �� Lo .y 30,000,000 Expenditures, expenses and other 25,000,000 financing uses by type 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 e5 aJ ee �a c.� �y �y o a y0 JAL p , a\4e 4 a\yat oar ei?a� y�ok�O Oe ��e ` °� OeQ �0 ° Lo L Q. What are the sources for City revenues? A. See chart below. Operating revenue is earned income from utility sales, liquor sales, and other business -type activities. 40,000,000 Revenue and other 35,000,000 financing sources 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 fie`' ��`' ��5 ��S �P,5 �e Je `may e° ee ac �cc e eo �c oo�eJ �tA �rL�S � �F °y� a°r aQe �Zyycc �as�o r�Se ���. t�J �o O \A� 410 Owr Q. How are taxes determined for my home? A. For an owner - occupied house or condominium: The first step is to multiply the 2010 assessor's estimated market value (EMV)/Taxable Market Value of your home by the "class rates" imposed by State Law. The result is known as your home's "tax capacity" (i.e. its taxable value). The class rates for owner - occupied housing are 1 % for the first $500,000 of market value and 1.25% for the market value in excess of $500,000. The next step is to multiply the tax capacity by the extension rate (i.e. tax rate) calculated for each taxing jurisdiction based upon their proposed expenditures. The final step is to multiply your tax capacity by the market value homestead credit rate. The result is a subtraction off your total tax bill. The maximum credit is $304.00 and is realized at $76,000 taxable market value. The credit diminishes after $76,000 taxable market value until it is a $0 credit at approximately $413,800 taxable market value. The result is your tax bill. Example $410,800 Home in the Edina School District $410,800 x 1 % _ $4,108 $ 0 x 1.25% _ $00 Tax Capacity 4,108 Extension Rate x 103.066% Tax $4,233.94 Plus - School Bond Levy Market Value $410,800 Referendum Rate x .19608% School Bond Tax $805.50 Plus - Park Bond Levy Market Value $410,800 Referendum Rate x .00653% Park Bond Tax $ 26.83 Less — Market Value Homestead Credit Market Value Maximum Credit Balance $410,800 76.000 X.40% 334,800 X.09% Total Taxes on Home $5,063.59 304.00 Maximum Credit 301.32 Reduction to Credit 2.68 Homestead Credit Q. Why did my tax bill increase more than the City's increase in its property tax levy? A. Tax increases result from 1) spending /levy decisions made by the city, county and school district and 2) "non- spending" factors that adjust the tax burden shared by different types of properties. First, the spending decisions. The City's preliminary tax levy adopted in early September reflected a 2.3% levy increase. Since then, the proposed City levy increase was reduced to 1.1 %. There is no change in the County's proposed levy for 2011. The Edina School District's proposed increase is 3.45 %. These spending changes are reflected on your proposed property tax statement, except that the decrease in the City's proposed levy is NOT reflected on the statement you received from the County. Second. the "non - spending' factors. • In terms of tax capacity, the tax base of the city decreased by 5.5% for taxes payable in 2011. The tax base of residential property decreased by 5.1 %. Commercial, industrial and apartment properties decreased by 6.4 %. This means that, as a class, residential property will bear a greater share of the tax burden in 2011 than in 2010, and commercial property will bear a lesser share of the tax burden in 2011 than in 2010. Q. Is there a program to offset unusually large increase in my tax bill? A. The State provides a maximum refund up to $2,350 for homeowners having incomes as high as $98,290. The actual refund depends on your individual income and tax bill. The targeting portion of the program offers tax relief no matter what your income is. If your taxes increase by more than 12 percent and at least $100, the State will refund 60% of any amount paid beyond those limits, up to a maximum of $1,000. The Minnesota Department of Revenue administers both the circuit breaker and targeted form of the Property Tax Refund. Q. The assessor's market value of my property seems too high. Can this be lowered? A. Taxes payable in 2011 -are based upon the assessor's valuation of your property on January 2, 2010. This value cannot be changed. The 2011 valuation of your property will be sent to you early in 2011 and will be the basis for your 2012 tax bill. The value placed on your property should reflect a price that could be obtained on the open market between a willing buyer and seller. If you do not feel the value placed on your property on January 2, 2011 could be realized on the open market, it may be appealed to the Edina Board of Appeal and Equalization in April 2011. Q. How can my property value go down and my taxes go up? A. Property taxes are fundamentally different than income taxes or sales taxes. In those cases, the tax rate is fixed and the taxes collected are determined by multiplying the rate by income or the value of the goods purchased. With property taxes, the property tax rate is determined each year after the city, county and the school district make their budget decisions. Property values are then used to allocate the tax burden in an equitable manner across all properties. A rising real estate market does not generate more tax revenue nor does a flat or declining market result in less tax revenue for the city. Property valuation simply determines how the tax levy will be spread out and your share of your community's property tax bill. If your value increased more than the average value increase of other properties in the city, you will assume a greater burden of the tax bill — and vice versa. Q. Where does my tax dollar go? A. That depends somewhat on where you live, because there are different school districts and watershed districts within City limits, and these different districts may have different tax rates. The distribution below represents taxes on a residence in the Edina School District ( #273). Please reference the attached map to see what the school district boundaries are. 2011 Proper t Tax Distribution City of Hennepin Edina, 21% County, M ro & 39% wale hed, Local TA schools, 34% Property Tax Impact on Residential Homesteads in Edina 2010 Payable Taxable Value 2011 Payable Taxable Value 2010 .Total Tax 2011 Proposed Total Tax $ Chan a % Change 2010 City Tax 2011 Proposed City Tax $ Change % Change 150,000 136,800 1,469 1,438 31 -2.1% 354 345 9 -2.5% 200,000 182,400 2,083 2,041 42 -2.0% 472 461 11 -2.3% 300,000 273,600 3,311 3,248 63 -1.9% 707 691 (16)_ -2.3% 500,000 456,000 5,689 5,624 65 -1.1% 1,179 1,151 28 -2.4% 700,000 638,400 8,434 8,230 204 -2.4% 1,765 1,697 68 -3.9% 900,000 1 820,800 1 11,178 10,949 229 -2.0%1 2,351 1 2,270 81 -3.4% Note: The above chart: 1.) Assumes a 8.8% decrease in taxable value. The actual value change varies from property to property. 2.) Median taxable value includes single - family, condominiums and townhouses. 3.) Is based upon proposed 2011 spending by all taxing jurisdictions. Property Tax Impact on Residential Single - Family Homesteads in Edina 2010 Payable Taxable Value 2011 Payable Taxable Value 2010 Total Tax 2011 Proposed Total Tax $ Change % Change 2010 City Tax 2011 Proposed City Tax $ Change % Change 150,000 142,700 1,469 1,516 47 3.2% 354 360 6 1.7% 200,000 190,200 2,083 2,144 61 2.9% 472 480 8 1.7% 300,000 285,300 3,311 3,403 92 2.8% 707 720 13 1.8% 432,000 500,000 410,800 475, 500 4,915 5,689 5,064 5,864 175 3.1% 1,179 1,201 22 1.9% 700,000 665,700 8,434 8,637 203 2.4% 1,765 1,783 18 1.0% 900,000 855,900 11,178 11,473 295 2.6%1 2,351 2,380 29 1.2% Note: The above chart: 1.) Assumes a 4.9% decrease in taxable value. The actual value change varies from property to property. 2.) Median taxable value includes only single - family property types. 3.) Is based upon proposed 2011 spending by all taxing jurisdictions. Property Tax Impact on Commercial Property in Edina 2010 Payable Taxable Value 2011 Payable Taxable Value 2010 Total Tax 2011 Proposed Total Tax $ Change % Change 2010 City Tax 2011 Proposed City Tax $ Change % Change 341,100 313,400 9,746 9,619 127 -1.3%1 936 873 63 -6.7% 625,000 574,300 18,789 18,644 145 -0.8% 1,809 1,697 112 -6.2% 909,000 835,300 27,836 27,672 164 -0.6% 2,683 2,521 (162)- -6.0% 1,700,800 1,931,100 1,563,000 1,774,600 60,394 60,162 232 -0.4% 5,827 5,487 340 -5.8% 2,158,200 1,983,300 67,628 67,381 247 -0.4% 6,498 6,146 352 -5.4% 2,386,100 1 2,192,8001 74,888 1 74,628 260 -0.3%1 7,226 1 6,807 419 -5.8% Note: The above chart : 1.) Assumes a 8.1% decrease in median market value. The actual value change varies from property to property. 2.) Is based upon proposed 2011 spending by all taxing jurisdictions. Hennepin County Property Tax Comparison - Based on Payable 2010 Taxes and Proposed 2011 TRUTH IN TAXATION RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES Note: A property (PID) is included in this table only if it has the same homestead /non- homestead classification for both tax years (payable 2010 and proposed 2011). A property (PID) is excluded from this table if it has an improvement amount, multiple taxable subrecords or a partial constuction indicator for proposed 2011 taxes (2010 assessment). Number and Percent of Property by Percent of Tax Change Decrease Increase Munic Code Munici pality Total # of PIDs .1%-4.9% 5.0%-9.9% 10.0% -14.9% 15.0% -19.9% 20.0% and over # % # % # % # % # % # % 24 Edina 15,762 3,288 20.86% 7,851 49.81% 3,399 21.56% 893 5.67% 209 1.33% 122 0.77% Note: A property (PID) is included in this table only if it has the same homestead /non- homestead classification for both tax years (payable 2010 and proposed 2011). A property (PID) is excluded from this table if it has an improvement amount, multiple taxable subrecords or a partial constuction indicator for proposed 2011 taxes (2010 assessment). ,. 01 VU REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II. B. From: John Keprios, Direct r Park and Recreation De artment ® Action ❑ Discussion 0 Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail ACTION REQUESTED: The Park Board recommends that the Council approve the creek -based route for the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail with the following restrictions and conditions: • Keep the trail on the south side of Walnut Ridge Park. • That Three Rivers Park District makes a reasonable effort to explore affordable accommodations in the engineering /design phase to minimize boardwalk noise. • That Three Rivers Park District offers to provide homeowners with principle residences within 25 feet of the proposed regional trail edge the option to have buffers where reasonable and at Three River's expense. Buffer options are fencing or vegetative screening (trees, shrubs). • That Three Rivers Park District take reasonable steps to minimize the amount of boardwalks in the complex balancing act that also attempts to minimize the impact on the environment (wetlands, water quality and vegetation). • Place a time limit deadline on the easements offered to Three Rivers Park District to complete the project within a reasonable time frame. A reasonable time limit should be negotiated with Three Rivers Park District and that language should be included in the easement agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At their Tuesday, October 12, 2010 meeting, the Park Board approved a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed creek -based route with the conditions listed above. A map of the creek -based route and a map of the road -based route are attached to this report. •1� Prior to opening the Public Hearing, I intend to give a brief power point presentation that summarizes the Park Board's recommendation. There will be several key staff from Three Rivers Park District present to answer any questions from the City Council. Joint Work Session Minutes from the September 29, 2010 Joint Work Session are attached to this report. At the Joint Work Session, Three Rivers Park District presented three scenarios for the City Council's consideration: 1. Road -Based Route 2. Creek -Based Route 3. No Build Option The City Council had several questions of Three Rivers Park District staff at that Joint Work Session. Answers to those questions are attached to this report. Historical Background As stated on Three Rivers Park District's website: "The goal of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is to provide a safe, multi -use regional trail through the City of Edina with connections to several local and regional destinations including the Edina Middle and High School campus, local parks, France Avenue business district, Southdale Mall, and Edina Promenade. In addition, the regional trail will connect local community members with over a hundred miles of regional trails and several regional parks throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area via the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail in Hopkins and the future Intercity Regional Trail in Richfield." This has been a lengthy process that began over ten years ago. Early in 1999, Hennepin Parks (now Three Rivers Park District) convened representatives from the First Tier communities (inner ring suburbs of Minneapolis) to explore the merits and potential locations for regional parks, trails or other recreational facilities in the First Tier suburban communities. At that time, the City of Edina and other participating communities indicated an interest and support for further study of potential regional facilities and particularly a regional trail. One of the segments identified was the Edina /Richfield /Hopkins corridor. In October of 2000, the Edina City Council passed a Resolution that stated: "The City of Edina supports the efforts of the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District to implement a first tier system of trails, greenways and parks and endorses the development of a conceptual plan for said systems which conceptual plan will be subject to further approval of the City of Edina." The first Open House was conducted on November 19, 2003 at Edina City Hall for the public to provide input on the beginning stages of a master plan for that corridor. This led to another Resolution passed by the City Council in December of 2003 that stated: "The City of Edina supports the efforts of the Three Rivers Park District to implement the Richfield /Edina Trail Corridor." In July of 2009, the City Council passed the following Resolution: "The City Council of the City of Edina supports the efforts of Three Rivers Park District to direct completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and use the results thereof to determine, with City participation, a preferred route for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the City of Edina. " Over the past two years, the Park District and the City of Edina coordinated efforts to complete environmental, social, technical, and economic assessments of the numerous alternative trail routes under consideration. Key process milestones over the past two years include: • August 2008 — Project Kickoff • December 2008 — Bike Edina Task Force Open House • February 2009 — Public Open House • March 2009 — Public Open House • August/September 2009 — Community Assessment Team (CAT) Nomination Process • September 2009 — Environmental Assessment Kickoff • December 2009 — CAT (social /technical /economic assessment) Kickoff • June 2010 — Community Assessment Team Study Completion • June 2010 — Two Public Open Houses • June /July 2010 — 30 -day Public Comment Period on Environmental, Social, Technical, and Economic Assessment • August 2010 — Environmental Assessment Completion • September 2010 - Edina City Council and Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners Joint Work Session • October 2010 — Park Board recommendation This has been a project of great interest for the City of Edina for the past ten years and has been an open and transparent process with significant community involvement. Over the past two years, there have been more than 300 letters and emails from the community that have been forwarded to the Park Board and City Council on this important issue. Rationale for Park Board's Recommendation The attached copy of Three Rivers Park District's power point presentation from the September 29, 2010 Joint Work Session does an excellent job of summarizing the findings of the Community Assessment Team process. It also shows the pros and cons of each scenario (creek -based route, road -based route and no build option). The power point copy also outlines the estimated project costs and financing vehicles. As staff pointed out to the Park Board, there are many benefits to having Three Rivers Park District provide and maintain a regional recreational trail through Edina: • The trail will provide 7 % additional miles of new biking /walking trails. • The trail will provide approximately 14 acres of new regional recreational park amenities in Edina to be built and maintained at Three Rivers Park District's expense. • It will connect Edina to a greater regional trail system. • This new linear recreational amenity promotes and offers get fit activities (healthy life style) for all ages. • It will give residents more access to enjoy nature and the out of doors. • 1 will provide additional safe off -road biking opportunities (vs. on -road bike lanes). The 2006 Community Attitude & Interest Survey validates the community's need and desire for more walking /biking trails. The survey also validates that residents want more trails for the purpose of exercising and enjoying nature and the out of doors. Although the survey did not ask residents about this specific trail and alignment, the survey clearly shows that the most important additional recreational amenities desired by the majority of Edina residents are more recreational trails. The Park Board recommends a creek -based option for the following reasons: • A creek -based option will likely get used more than road -based option. • The creek -based route is more aesthetically pleasing for walkers and cyclists who wish to enjoy nature and the out of doors (one of the main reasons the community wants more recreational trails). • The creek -based route is a good use of public land for the public good and there is no need to purchase private land. • Data suggests that a creek -based option is safer than road -based option (fewer driveway and road crossings). As shown in the attached October 12th Park Board meeting minutes and Staff Report, staff recommended that the trail through Walnut Ridge Park should be on the south side of the park where it was originally proposed, as opposed to routing it past the hockey rink and to the north side of the park. The south side route is recommended by staff and Park Board to keep the trail further from the hockey rink and further from private properties immediately next to the hockey rink. In addition, the south alignment is the shortest distance between the two points of entrance /exit to the park, which suggests that cyclists and pedestrians may likely use the south alignment regardless if the trail winds further to the north side or not. A copy of the map showing our preferred alignment is attached to this report. Notification and Process . To inform the community of this Public Hearing on December 7, 2010, City Clerk Deb Mangen.submitted an Official Publication to the Edina Sun Current for publication on November 4, 11, 18, 25 and December 2, 2010. A copy of the Official Publication is attached. In 'addition; Communications Director Jennifer Bennerotte posted the attached Public Notice on the City's website since November 4, 2010. If a trail route is approved by Council, the next step in the process would be for Three Rivers. Park District to take the matter to the Nine Mile Watershed District and the Edina Board of Education for their approval. The final approval then rests with the Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners. If all entities. approve, then the implementation steps would be: • Master plan completion • Cooperative Trail -way Agreement • Trail easement • Grant applications • Construction At the October 12, 2010 Park Board meeting, the Chairman permitted the public to express their views even though it was not a scheduled Public Hearing. Results of that community input are reflected in the attached meeting minutes. Of the ten voting Park Board members, eight voted in favor of the motion to recommend a creek -based route, one opposed and one abstained. ATTACHMENTS: October 12, 2010 Park Board Staff Report October 12, 2010 Park Board Minutes Creek -Based Route Map Road -Based Option Map Map Showing Preferred Route through Walnut Ridge Park September 29, 2010 Joint Work Session Minutes Responses to Questions asked at the 9/29/2010 Joint Work Session Joint Work Session Power Point Presentation Official Publication Notice Notice of Public Hearing I OCTOBER 12, 2010 PARK BOARD MEETING STAFF REPORT The following is the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail segment of the Tuesday, October 12, 2010 Park Board Meeting Staff Report. C. *Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Let me first begin by saying thank you to all Park Board members who have taken so much time and energy to stay involved with and informed about this important and controversial issue. As I have mentioned many times before, the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail process has been ongoing for the past ten years. It is rewarding to know that the time has come to make final decisions one way or another. As a matter of process, it is my recommendation that the Park Board hear an abbreviated power point presentation from Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning for Three Rivers Park District. After Kelly's presentation, the Park Board should ask questions of me, Kelly Grissman and other Three Rivers Park District staff that are present. After the Park Board has asked questions of staff, I recommend that any public present be welcomed to speak at the meeting. At the October 5 Council meeting, the City Council decided that the issue of whether or not to allow public comment at the Park Board meeting is left to the Park Board and specifically the Park Board Chairman to decide. It is my recommendation to allow the public to speak to this agenda item but limit each individual speaker to 3 minutes. The Council has decided to conduct a Public Hearing on this matter on Tuesday, December 7, 2010 at their regular Council meeting. There will not be a Public Hearing at a Park Board meeting. Enclosed are 36 color pages of Kelly Grissman's 54 page power point presentation that was shown at the Joint Work Session on September 29, 2010. 1 believe that these 36 pages do an excellent job summarizing the issue and presenting the facts. The first five pages referring to the 2006 Needs Assessment Survey show that the overwhelming majority of Edina residents need, desire and support additional walking and biking trails. It also shows that exercise, fitness and enjoying nature are the most important reasons for wanting walking and biking trails in Edina. The next several pages summarize the Community Assessment Team's (CAT) role and the findings of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). There is also a summary of the 30 -day public comment period for the EAW. There are also colored maps showing the plans and developments in place to the east and west of Edina. The following pages show "Key CAT Considerations," which include Social, Technical and Economic Assessments. The factual results of those studies are shown on the five "Key CAT considerations" pages. One of the main concerns about this trail has been and continues to be the close proximity of adjacent homes. I find it interesting that there are eight homes within less than 25 feet of the road -based route; however, only three homes less than 25 from the trail on a creek -based route. The average distance from house to trail is only 90 feet on a road -based route; whereas, an average of 175 feet for a creek -based route. With a road -based route, there are still 82 back yards adjacent to the trail; whereas, there are 216 back yards in a creek -based route. There are clearly more residential yards adjacent to the trail in the creek -based route (243) compared to only 147 adjacent residential yards in a road -based route. Conversely, there are only 31 driveway crossings in the creek -based route vs. 60 driveways in the road -based route. The road -based option has three times the number of road crossings. I believe this data shows that a creek -based route would be a safer route (fewer driveways and road crossings); however, at the expense of more adjacent homeowners losing their privacy that have enjoyed in the past. This is not to downplay the impact on residents who own property closest to the proposed trail in the creek -based option. There will be a significant impact on their privacy and in some cases their quality of life. Of all the issues raised in this debate, that is one of the most challenging in my view because there are not good alternatives that are in the best interests of the greater majority. The harsh reality is that, without written covenants in place, those who purchase land next to publicly owned property are at risk for future development. To Three Rivers Park District's credit, they have identified an outstanding recreational trail through Edina that does not require condemnation of any private land. Kelly's power point slides also show excellent samples of a typical regional trail including a photo example of the road -based type trail, such as Bassett Creek Regional Trail. As you will notice, the road -based route does not mean that the bike trail is on the street (a common misconception). It is Kelly's intention to have more information available to bring to the Park Board meeting on the 12`h that addresses how many feet of boardwalk are needed and exactly where it might be needed to complete the trail for a creek -based route. Included are some examples of boardwalks, such as the Lake Independence Regional Trail and Dakota Rail Regional Trail. Three Rivers Park District staff has been requested by Council to study alternative materials to help minimize the noise on boardwalks. The financing vehicles and projects costs are also shown in the attachments. The creek - based route is expected to cost approximately $20 million to build; however, the road - based route is estimated to cost approximately $17 million. The three options for the Park Board's consideration (same as presented to the Council last week) are: 1. Creek -based option 2. Road -based option 3. No route option The pros and cons are also shown for the creek -based and road -based options. In my view, the two main "pros" for the creek -based option are to provide a high quality recreational trail experience and it creates a safe off -road access to the Edina High School campus. The main "cons" of a road -based route are the fact that it does not accomplish the two main reasons why the overwhelming majority of Edina residents want trails (exercise and enjoy nature); plus it does not provide a safe access to the Edina High School campus. The stated pros and cons in the presentation are factual and speak for themselves but I believe those to be very compelling reasons for choosing a creek -based option. I support and recommend a creek -based option but not without some further recommendations and conditions. I feel strongly that the trail alignment through Walnut Ridge Park should be on the south side of the park where it was originally proposed, as opposed to routing it past the hockey rink and to the north side of the park. Either route still ends up at the same point on the east end of the park. The north side of Walnut Ridge Park was proposed to avoid flooding issues. The south side route is a viable option and in my view should be the preferred alignment through the park. The Council expressed concerns about boardwalk noise. I believe it is appropriate to further recommend that all reasonable and affordable accommodations in design should be taken to minimize boardwalk noise. I further recommend that the final creek -based alignments should be engineered in a manner that minimizes the amount of required boardwalks, their height and close proximity to households. I would also suggest that we request that Three Rivers Park District offer to provide homeowners the option to have buffers (similar to their past practice with their other regional trails) where reasonable and at Three Rivers expense. Buffers could include fencing and/or landscaping (trees, shrubs and/or building berms). I ask that this offer be extended to those homeowners that are within 25 feet of the trail. We understand that the exact placement of the trail will have to be determined in the engineering phase. I would recommend that all reasonable steps be taken to minimize the amount of boardwalks in a balancing act that also attempts to minimize the impact on the environment (wetlands, water quality and vegetation). We also recognize that there are construction costs implications that also compete in that complex balancing act of keeping the trail furthest from private property lines as possible. In our fully developed community, there is not an abundance of undeveloped city -owned property that can be converted to wetlands to meet mitigation requirements. Therefore, the exact placement and design of a creek -based route needs to be mindful of those limitations. There are concerns about project delays due to lack of available funding (grants) or other unforeseen factors. One strategy would be to place a time limit deadline on the easements offered to Three Rivers Park District to complete the project within a reasonable time frame. If Three Rivers fails to complete the project within a given timeframe, the City of Edina should reserve the right to retract that easement. We will need to further discuss this issue with Three Rivers Park District to better understand and agree to a reasonable timeframe. In my view, the language should be drafted mainly to protect the City of Edina's interests in the case that the trail does not get developed after an extraordinary amount of time passed. One idea might be to consider language that states the easement shall expire after "X" number of years unless reasonable effort, progress and funding has been made or secured by Three Rivers Park District to fulfill its obligation of the agreement. I propose we assign this one to our legal counsel to draft a recommendation for the Council's consideration. There is enormous benefit to Edina residents to have the Three Rivers Park District cover all construction costs and all ongoing maintenance and operation costs. The anticipated operational costs to the City of Edina would include those law enforcement calls when called upon to be the first responder; plus, any winter plowing and maintenance during the winter months but only if the City of Edina chooses to plow the trail during the winter months. That operational decision would be made on an annual basis by the City of Edina. I encourage Park Board members to see this issue in a positive light that creek -based option brings 7 and `/z miles of new walking/biking trails into Edina which is equivalent to just over 14 acres of new park amenities. It's like adding another park almost the size of Arneson Acres Park (15 acres) or another park larger than Weber Park (12 acres). Over ten years ago, the City of Edina asked Hennepin Parks to provide services and facilities within the City of Edina. Edina elected officials felt at the time that it is deserved due to the large amount of tax revenues that are funneled from Edina taxpayers annually to the Hennepin County park system. Three Rivers Park District has invested approximately $100,000 to date in this effort to make this become a reality without any assurance that the City Council would in the end approve this project. I believe it's time to make that vision a reality and provide a much desired amenity that will be enjoyed by Edina residents for many years to come. This connection to our neighbors to the east and west will open the door to a trail system that is the envy of the United States. Minneapolis has been named the number one bike friendly city in the country. I believe that this amenity will be another tremendous amenity and reason for people to want to live, work and raise families in the community. Another benefit of this trail (whether it's road -based or creek - based) is to reverse the trend of childhood obesity. We have at least one generation of children that are at serious health risk due to the obesity issue. Experts tell us it's largely due to the electronic video game era that keeps kids indoors and lacking exposure to nature and lack healthy physical activity. This trail is another important piece of that complex issue that will help combat childhood obesity and serious and expensive future health care issues. In my view, a road -based route is not the best option because I don't believe it would benefit Edina residents as much as a creek -based route. As a result, I don't believe that a road -based route would get used and enjoyed nearly as much as a creek -based route. Based on the factual results of our 2006 Community Attitude and Interest Survey, the overwhelming majority of Edina residents want more biking and walking trails for the purpose of exercise, fitness and enjoying nature. In my view, that validates the majority of resident's need and desire for a creek -based option walking/biking trail. In conclusion, I recommend that the Park Board propose to the City Council a creek -based option regional trail with the additional recommendations mentioned earlier regarding the trail alignment at Walnut Ridge Park, easement rights, buffers and the issues involving the boardwalks. Formal Park Board action is'requested on this agenda item. Minutes of the Edina Park Board October 12, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Ellen Jones, Jennifer Kenney, Austin Dummer, Felix Pronove, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Louise Segreto, Bill Lough STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Doug Bauman, Tom Shirley, Ann Kattreh, Todd Anderson I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Louise Segreto SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS C. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail — Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning from Three Rivers Park District, gave a power point presentation. She indicated that the Park District and city staff are requesting the Park Boards' assistance in reviewing the three different options of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail through the community of Edina. She pointed out that the three options include predominately a creek -based route, a road =based route as well as a no -build option. Jonathon Vlaming, Chief of Planning at Three Rivers Park District, talked about the regional trail system as well as their recently passed vision plan. Mr. Vlaming noted that there are over 100 miles of regional trails throughout Suburban Hennepin County and that they are looking at over two million visits annually on the hundreds of miles of trails that are currently open. He indicated that the trails serve both a recreational function as well as a transportation function but primarily the focus is on the recreation portion. Mr. Vlaming pointed out that their trails connect to neighborhoods, to schools, to parks, to greenways or linear parks, and connect to grand rounds. He added that you can bike downtown from their trail network as well as past downtown and into St. Paul. Mr. Vlaming informed the Park Board that last summer Three Rivers passed a vision plan that had five actionable goals and three directly relate to why they have regional trails in the first place. Mr. Vlaming indicated that first they are in the business of inspiring people to recreate and they have found with regional trails that if you build it they will come. More specifically if you build a regional trail they will come in mass from the area within about a half mile of the trail. He noted it's about convenience and proximity, as people will take advantage of amenities when they are near where they live. Mr. Vlaming pointed out that people go to these trails for health reasons, exercise, to talk to their friends, to develop community and simply to play and be outdoors. Mr. Vlaming stated that the second goal relating to trails is to connect people to nature because very few people will walk out into the woods unless there is a path to walk on and the regional trails serve that function. It's an introduction into the woods for many people because it's a safe, secure type of environment. Mr. Vlaming indicated that regional trails are also important for creating vibrant places. He pointed out that the "Star Tribune" recently ran a series of articles on the aging baby boomers. He noted that retiring baby boomers will create a new challenge; however, to meet that challenge they need to maintain a balanced economy which includes retaining and attracting entrepreneurs, retaining and attracting innovators and retaining and attracting young workers. Mr. Vlaming pointed out that one thing young workers are going to be looking for are alternative transportation networks in developed biking systems. Mr. Vlaming informed the Park Board that it was recently proclaimed that Minneapolis is the number one city for biking in America and that part of that success was the regional trail network. He stated that if you put together a network that crosses cities, crosses communities and ties communities together what it is doing is creating a critical mass for marketing to a much needed younger generation to come in and continue to stay. Mr. Vlaming noted that with that vision plan it recognizes the importance of regional trails throughout the plan. It recognizes the importance of providing regional recreational trail facilities within the developed cities, Edina and other first ring suburbs in Minneapolis, as it also recognizes the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail as one of the primary capital projects in the ten year capital forecast within the plan. He noted that the Park District has a very strong interest in this project and has been very supportive in moving it forward. Ms. Grissman informed the Park Board that the Community Assessment Team (CAT) was compiled about a year ago and it included representatives of every route /section that was under consideration at that time. She noted that it also included Edina City Staff, Park District Staff, Watershed District, a representative from the Edina School District, Joseph Hulbert from the Park Board as well as a representative from the Edina Task Force. She explained that the role of the CAT was three fold. First, identify the constraints and opportunities of each route under consideration. Second, provide design suggestions and considerations for each route under consideration as well as the entire 'route through the city, and third to convey information back to respective neighbors. Ms. Grissman indicated that as of June their work was done and they concluded with a document. She noted that the document included social, technical and economic assessments for each route design suggestions and the entire route. She added that it also provided an opportunity for CAT members to include a narrative on their thoughts of their route as well as the process. Ms. Grissman commented that in respect to the social, technical and economic assessment what this included was for the social part how many people live adjacent to the this trail, how many backyards there are, how many front yards there are and how many destinations do the different routes serve. For the technical it was things like how many road crossings, how many driveway crossings, is road construction required and is design deviations required in order to accommodate the regional trail where a public right -of -way may not be as wide as anticipated or where there are other constraints that would limit typical regional trail design. She noted that the economic assessment is how much the different routes are going to cost. Ms. Grossman went through the feedback of the 30 day comment period and noted that they received over 200 correspondences from the community members sharing their preference. Ms. Segreto asked on the creek -based route there are roughly 243 residential homes that will be adjacent to the property and to the trail and asked Ms. Grissman to talk about buffers that Three Rivers has offered to home owners to help shield the trail. Ms. Grissman replied that they have worked with local communities and adjacent property owners and have done things with split rail fencing, vegetative screening and dirt berms that would be vegetative. She indicated 2 that they will also look at how close the primary residence is to the trail and work with the city to determine what criteria should be considered in offering those amenities so that it's consistent with the city and the type of regional trail that the city is hoping to obtain through their community. Ms. Segreto asked who would be responsible for that expense to which Ms. Grissman replied the Park District. Mr. Fronek asked why the CP rail line was not considered because it seems every other community where Three Rivers puts bike trails they are along rail lines. Ms. Grissman explained that the reason CP has not been implemented is because it is still an active rail line and Canadian Pacific at this time is not interested in entertaining any conversations regarding an active rail and trail corridor. She noted that in other locations where they have used rail corridors for regional trails it's generally because the rail operating authority has abandoned the corridor, therefore making it available for regional trail construction and operation. Mr. Hulbert asked approximately how many acres of parkland is the trail going through if it's going to be a creek -based route or a road -based route. Ms. Grissman replied that for the creek -based route it would be 685 acres of existing park land and for the road -based route it would be 530 acres. It's approximately a 150 acres difference. Mr. Lough asked Ms. Grissman if they have gotten any reaction from the School Board or the School administration. Ms. Grissman replied that they have worked with a School District representative throughout the project and they are very excited and supportive currently of the trail route. She pointed out that the creek -based route would utilize school district property and will provide access from the school district to Bredesen Park. She noted that the school district is looking at the opportunity of cross country skiing, high school running teams, expanding their environmental services program to do water sampling and vegetative analysis in Bredesen Park as well as the parkland and the school district property on the south side of Highway 62. Ms. Segreto asked what are the federal financing deadlines that they are being faced with in continuing on with the decision making process so that they can meet those deadlines. Ms. Grissman replied that June 2011 is the federal solicitation deadline for federal funds available in 2015 and 2016 and that is predominating what the Park District is looking at funding for this project. She noted that in order to meet that June deadline they need to have a route approved and established in very early March so that they can put the application together and submit it timely. Mr. Lough indicated that he would like to think that the working relationship between Three Rivers and the City of Edina and the residents of Edina would at all times be exemplary. However, if legitimate disagreements arise and they become nettlesome is there an established process for resolving the differences that might arise. Mr. Vlaming responded that it would go back to a standard trail way agreement which is whenever they develop a trail they sign an agreement with the city. The agreement lays out the agreed upon rules for moving forward in the project. It also describes how in the design phase if they are to do the design work how it essentially needs to go before the City Council for approval before they actually break dirt. He noted that in some cities the city itself does the design work and then that design work goes to their Park Board for approval before they break ground. Mr. Vlaming stated that in either case it continues to be a mutually agreed upon outcome that they are working towards. Mr. Peterson asked how other cities have handled boardwalks and if any other cities have creeks that overflow every spring. He also asked if there are boardwalks in place or are there boardwalks planned in Minnetonka and/or Hopkins. Ms. Grissman replied there are no boardwalks planned in Minnetonka and Hopkins and as far as their regional trail system they do not have an identical situation to what they have on routes 9 and 11. She noted that they do have very similar situations to route 2 and that is south of Medicine Lake along the Luce Line Regional Trail. Ms. Grissman stated that in working with other communities they have been very open to design solutions that maintain a useable trail yearly or just spring, summer and fall. They are interested in providing a safe means to their community members to use the trail. She added this is a unique situation and is something that their engineers as well as the environmental assessment work has indicated that a feasible solution is possible. Mr. Peterson asked Ms. Grissman if is it her professional opinion that if the trail was a hard surface at essentially creek level and was not useable for a couple three weeks each spring is that a big problem. Ms. Grissman replied that she thinks the big problem having it at grade through a wetland is that you have to then mitigate for the wetland impacts. She noted that the wetlands along the creek corridor are generally considered high quality wetlands and for every one acre of wetland that is impacted they would need to mitigate or create nine additional wetland acres. She pointed out that there is not space available in the City of Edina, at least not that she is aware of, where they could construct a trail at grade through a wetland situation and then do the mitigations in close proximity to where the wetland was impacted. Mr. Hulbert asked; in the event of a flood, who would be responsible for cleaning up along and around the pilings? Ms. Grissman replied that she believes in that situation it would be the Park District's responsibility to assist if not take complete ownership of the operation of maintenance and the cleanup associated with the flooding. Mr. Hulbert asked when a boardwalk is constructed is it not constructed in a fashion that it can be submerged for three weeks. Ms. Grissman replied that depending on the design it could be underwater but cannot speak to how long it could be underwater; however, they can continue to study and provide information back to the Park Board if it's something they are interested in learning more about. Mr. Dummer asked if there is any overhead lighting on the Dakota Trail and Elm Creek Park Reserve Trail to which Ms. Grissman replied no. Mr. Dummer asked if there would be an exception for the Nine Mile Creek Trail in Edina. Ms. Grissman responded that at this point they are not proposing lighting but if it is something the City is interested in entertaining they could certainly work together on addressing it. Mr. Fronek indicated that he has participated in the bike race "Purple Ride" that is held at the Elm Creek Park Reserve trail which Three Rivers has been very gracious to offer that spot. He stated that doesn't know if events like that, with thousands of bikers, are necessarily appropriate per se in a fully developed suburb. Mr. Fronek asked is there a Three Rivers policy in terms of races and events. Ms. Grissman replied that they do not have a policy in place currently that would restrict that kind of activity. She noted that if it is something that Edina is not interested in hosting within the community, then it's something they could work into the agreement that would exclude those types of activities or activities that have a certain threshold of participation. She pointed out that in most cases activities are very short lived, it may be on a Saturday from 8:00 am to noon so that the impact on the community is very minor in that respect. Mr. Hulbert asked who pays for the cost to police the trails and in the winter when the trails are shut down are the residents responsible for snow removal such as a sidewalk. Ms. Grissman replied that the public safety costs are included in the $185,000 annual anticipated 4 operation maintenance costs, it would be the park district's burden to bear. She noted that in terms of snow removal they currently are not removing snow in the winter; however, she believes the city does have an ordinance about snow removal. Mr. Keprios pointed out that there is not an ordinance that applies to the trails within Edina's park system, but there is an ordinance with regards to sidewalks. He noted that Three Rivers is offering the City the option to maintain it during the winter months and if they so choose to do that it would be at the city's expense. Mr. Hulbert asked would the law enforcement be at the expense of Three Rivers on a yearly basis. Ms. Grissman replied that their officers are available all of the time but that patrol might be less frequent during the winter because they are not operating and maintaining it, but if there were an emergency or complaint they would certainly respond. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Keprios would there be any difference in approach to snow removal between a creek -based trail and a road -based trail. Mr. Keprios replied that decision would be left up to City Council essentially on an annual basis whether they would want to continue to maintain it during the winter months. Mr. Dummer asked about the residential yards adjacent to the trail, if those residents would have a private access to the trail or would they still have to go through a public access point. Ms. Grissman replied she doesn't know what type of ordinance the city currently has on whether residents have to stay on trails through a natural corridor or is the city amendable to people walking out their backyard and accessing the trail. She asked Mr. Keprios what type of access the city would prefer. Mr. Keprios replied if this gets built he thinks they would encourage that the access points be either easements of the city or publicly owned property. Mr. Keprios gave a presentation to the Park Board and indicated that on September 29`h at the joint work session with the elected bodies of the City of Edina and the Board of Commissioners for Three Rivers it was suggested by staff to propose the three options that Ms. Grissman just went over. He stated that the City Council has asked that the Park Board deliberate on these three options and make a recommendation. Mr. Keprios stated that the City Council will be holding a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 2010, in the City Council Chambers. He noted that everyone who would like to speak to that issue that evening will be given an opportunity. He indicated that if the City Council makes the decision to move forward with one of the options it would then go to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and from there on to the Edina Public Schools, since it is partly on their property. Mr. Keprios went over the benefits of a walking/biking trail and noted that in this case it would add 7 '/2 additional miles of new biking and walking trails, currently there are just over nine miles of trails within Edina's park system. He noted that it equates to approximately an additional 14 acres of new park amenities if they were to add all the land it would take. Mr. Keprios commented that it would connect Edina to the greater regional trail system and will connect to the Minneapolis Grand Rounds. He added it would promote and offer get fit activities, it would promote a healthy lifestyle for people of all ages and it would give residents more access to enjoy nature and the outdoors. Mr. Keprios indicated that it would provide additional safe off -road biking opportunity versus more on -road bike lanes regardless of the route. Also, it would provide regional recreational facilities within the City of Edina which is something that has been asked of since 1998. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that staff would recommend to the Park Board to consider a creek -based option. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the 2006 community attitude and interest survey was very clear in the result and that it validates the need and desire for walking and biking trails. More walking and biking trails were the number one most requested amenity by residents. He noted that the survey also validates why residents of Edina want more trails; to exercise, get fit, enjoy the outdoors and enjoy nature. He indicated that a creek -based option is safer than a road -based option as well as the creek -based option is likely to be used more than a road -based option. He noted that the creek -based option is obviously more aesthetically pleasing for walkers and cyclists. Mr. Keprios commented in his view its excellent use of public land for a public good and the whole route is accomplished without having to use private land to either purchase or condemn. Mr. Keprios indicated that the engineering phase is a complex phase which they would be very engaged in should this go forward. He noted that Three Rivers would have to do a very complex balancing act with the homeowners, the environment, the wetlands, water quality, natural resources and construction costs. He stated that it all plays a role when you are trying to find exactly where the trail is to be placed which is done during the engineering phase and the City would be very much involved in that process. Mr. Keprios stated that he recommends the creek -based route but under several conditions. He noted that he would agree that it would be nice to minimize the amount of boardwalks, but again that would to be determined through the engineering phase. He pointed out that the nine to one mitigation pretty much dictates where they are going to have to build boardwalks. He added that he would also like to offer the condition that, if it is decided to build a creek -based route, homeowners should be provided some buffer options like they have done in similar situations in other regional trails either by landscaping or fencing options. Mr. Keprios commented that the easement deadline restriction idea was born out of the joint work session on the 29`n and he suggested that we should work with the attorneys to establish the proper language. The easement deadlines are needed to protect the City of Edina's interests in case unforeseen factors occur and the trail doesn't get built in a reasonable time frame. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he would like to see Route 2 be a little more fine - tuned. He would like to see it go back to the original recommendation of going through the south side of Walnut Ridge Park as opposed to the north edge because it would still end up at the same starting point and ending point within the Park. He added that he knows there are some issues with possibly some wetlands and flood issues; however, Ms. Grissman has informed him that it is something they can work together on. To sum up his recommendation Mr. Keprios would.like for the Park Board to recommend to the City Council to approve a creek -based option with the stated conditions and use that as a basis for the City Council to conduct a public hearing, which is scheduled for Tuesday, December 7 th Mr. Keprios informed the audience that they have received well over 300 letters, a -mails and various files from the public and as of tonight they are now available for viewing on -line in a PDF format through the Park and Recreation Department section of the City of Edina website. Bob Schwartzbauer, 6107 Waterford Court, indicated that he is a member of the Community Assessment Team and represented Route 3. He showed the map of Route 3 and explained how he would like to shorten it and reinforce what Mr. Keprios and Three Rivers said about safety concerns caused by road crossing and driveway crossings. He highlighted the area where it starts and pointed out that it creates centrally a triangle and the interesting thing about the triangle is that there are no streets or automobile bridges anywhere along this section of the creek which means everyone who lives or works within that triangle in order to leave must use either Lincoln or Vernon. He explained that the proposal is that the trail would go along the north side of Vernon and on the east side of Londonderry which means that anyone who lives or works in that triangle in order to leave their homes or work are going to have to cross the trail every time they leave or go back. Mr. Schwartzbauer noted that inside that triangle is United Healthcare's World Headquarters and he was told that they have 1,100 cars parked in their parking lot every week which means that on average they will have about 2,200 road crossings going across the trail in that section. He added that in addition there are approximately 800 residents that live in that area and assuming they leave their house on average once a day and are going to cross that trail. Therefore in effect there will be 1,800 — 1,900 trail crossings or automobile crossings the trail every day for a total of 3,000 to 4,000 trail crossings. He indicated that the Park District realize this is unsafe and are proposing to deal with it by putting up stop signs for the bicycles at various points so in effect bicyclist will have to stop 8 times through this entire section and noted that isn't going to happen and the bicyclist will not want to do that. He commented that instead he thinks they ride right onto the street or not use the trail since a lot of time ... he was cut off Bill Westerdahl, 5912 Walnut Drive, indicated that it has always been assumed that Three Rivers would pay the maintenance and security on the regional trail. He noted however, that information from Three Rivers indicates that they may not have the financial resources to pay for maintenance and security which are paid from their general /operating fund. He pointed out that Three Rivers currently has approximately 30 miles including the Edina section of the Nine Mile Creek Trail, a regional trail in the active planning stage and approximately ten miles of trail scheduled for construction in 2010 which is an addition of approximately 40% of the existing trail network. Mr. Westerdahl pointed out that Three Rivers 2010 Operations Budget indicate that Three Rivers is approaching its statutory limit of 300 of 1% of total market value of property to fund their operations. He noted that Three Rivers has frozen its employees' wages in 2010 and 2011. Also, Three Rivers is dependent on the property value levy to provide 84% of its operating revenues. He indicated that in the last four years property values for which they depend on these revenues in their levy limit have declined over 10 %. He added that their operational expenses have increased 25% or 7 million dollars in the last four years. Mr. Westerdahl pointed out that if the property tax levy as it exists now is barely sufficient to fund present Three Rivers Park District operations which include maintenance and security how will they be sufficient to cover a plan that is a 40% increase in the trail system as well as an additional Scott County Park. He asked if Three Rivers is not able to fund maintenance and security in the future then who is going to be responsible for maintenance and security on this trail. The City of Edina is being asked to cede control of 13 plus acres of prime parkland contained in 7 miles of trails of Three Rivers. He noted his question is if Three Rivers is not able to raise the funds to maintain the maintenance is this going to fall back on the City of Edina over the long run. He stated that he would like to hear Three Rivers respond to that, what they are going to do about this difference between their levy limits and the amount of money it's obviously going to cost to continue to maintain their system. Michael Lilja, 5809 McGuire Rd, informed the Park Board that his wife and he started biking a few years ago and they would put their bikes in the back of the car and go to Hopkins to get on the Three Rivers Trail, which is a tremendous trail system. He indicated that people in cars don't pay very much attention to bikes so bikers need to pay a lot of attention to cars. He stated that right now they have the ability to build a premier trail because they have this public corridor along the creek that would be safe for kids and people walking, roller blading, etc.; it's a multi -use trail, not just a bike trail. They have a chance to put in a high quality trail and it's not just about the people here today but it's about the long -term for their community because people come and go so what they are doing is creating an amenity that will last in time and will signify something about their community and he hopes something they can be proud of. Fritz Corrigan, 6509 Biscayne Blvd., indicated that his house immediately backs up to Walnut Ridge Park that they built over 26 years ago. He noted that as a family they run on the basis of what they need every day versus what they would like to have and they don't do things they can't afford to do. He noted that he thinks this approach to how they manage their family would be a good one for this case. He stated that this is not something that is required but it is something that would be wonderful to have someday, but it's not required today. He pointed out that today this country is broke, the State of Minnesota has a 5 billion dollar deficit, the Three Rivers Park District has no money and is going to have to issue bond financing to put this in and now they are talking about spending 20 million dollars on a bike path. He commented it would be wonderful if they could afford it but they simply cannot so they should wait until they can afford to do it which is not next year. Andrew Heyer, 5717 Deville Dr., indicated that he is for the creek -based trail and also founded a Facebook group that supports the trail and currently there are 201 members in this group. He showed the Park Board some photos of different trails that might address some of the concerns that have been raised. He noted that in summary he urges the Park Board to support the regional trail. Dianne Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, informed the Park Board that she is chair of the Edina Environmental Commission and that their recommendation to support the creek -based trail was approved at their August 12`h meeting. She noted that the trail offers many benefits to the community for all ages and would make biking safer and more accessible to all. She commented that Edina currently is deficient in bike trails for its citizens in comparison to surrounding communities. In addition, it would allow access to public land that is currently inaccessible to the vast majority of residents. The trail will provide a crucial part of plans that have been developed as part of the city's comprehensive plan and also part of the international council for local environmental initiatives of which Edina is a member. She noted that it also supports the green step cities programs which Edina will hopefully soon be joining. Ms. Plunkett- Latham indicated that obviously there are some concerns about the impact of the trail along the creek; however, the trail will be routed through an area that has already been impacted by years of urbanization including chemical runoff from the lawns and road salt in adjacent streets. She commented that the project will open the possibility of reversing some of that damage as the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District will be improving the creek. She indicated that promoting and building bike and pedestrian trails, especially regional trails is a great action item in helping Edina go green and make the community less dependent on auto transportation. Richard Griffith, 7009 Comanche Court, informed the Park Board that he has been a member of the Edina Bike Task Force since its inception. He noted that he is here to explain why he believes the creek -based route is really essential for the growth and development of our community. He pointed out that it costs the school district a lot of money to bus kids to school and the new walkways that are going to be put in will allow kids who live less than a mile from major schools to walk. He added this will make everybody healthy and save money from 8 bussing. Therefore, he would like the Park Board to consider not only the quality of life but the economic aspects of providing a transportation alternative to driving your kids to school when they can walk. He feels the creek -based route would be wonderful. Harvey Johnson, 5505 Valley Lane, indicated that he is a member of the CAT team and is also involved with the protecting Nine Mile Creek. He noted that there are approximately 500 members that are concerned about the environment of Nine Mile Creek. He stated that from his point of view he doesn't feel that Three Rivers has done an adequate job of giving Edina the information it needs to make a decision about the trail. He commented that this is the largest project that Edina has had in a long time that will affect Edina residents. Mr. Johnson stated that there are many open issues that need to be discussed and there are many things that are clouded in the whole decision making process. He pointed out that one that was asked is if community members or other groups been involved in the process to which he will tell you no. He stated that he has a couple of documents and one is the resolution from the elected members of the CAT Team that states that they did not endorse the Community Assessment Report. He noted that the Community Assessment Report went to press without the support of the elected members. He explained that his group to protect Nine Mile Creek gave a very detailed response to the environmental assessment with information that they would like answered, but didn't really get answers so they asked an environmental attorney what he thought about their response. He read one sentence from that attorney "The Park District largely ignored the comments in most cases, the Park District utterly failed to respond to the comments as it must under the Minnesota Environmental Protection Act." Mr. Johnson stated that they don't think the Park Board has enough facts to make a decision and would recommend that the Park Board get the facts before they decide where the trail should be. Ray O'Connell, 4612 Valley View Road, indicated that they all pay property taxes included in the provisions to allocate a number of dollars for the Nine Mile Creek District that has been in place for the last 20 years. He noted that during that time there have been a significant number of dollars allocated to Hennepin County in budgeting for Nine Mile Creek District and it's a big number. He stated that Three Rivers is also responsible for all of the planning and protection of the Nine Mile Creek corridor which includes not just water but the land that borders the creek. Mr. O'Connell pointed that the corridor belongs to all of the taxpayers and, even though there are some groups who are for this while others are against it, they have to look to natural law and the common good and consider where all of these other people that are not talking. He noted that he wants to make that point because there should be no covenant enacted that would be detrimental to benefit the few but would be detrimental to the whole. He stated that the proposed trail is not only needed but will be historic. Jed Hepworth, 5509 Valley Lane, indicated that about a year ago they (Save the Nine Mile Creek Task Force) sent a letter to the Park Board talking about some of the issues that they think need to be dealt with and are still on the table. He commented that he thinks one of the big ones for this group to think about is what a 16 foot wide trail down the Nine Mile Creek Watershed means to the parkland that this board is responsible for administering. He stated that essentially it means that not quite two acres of land per mile are going to be turned into pavement and rock siding. Therefore, he thinks it really is important they acknowledge what's going to happen if they build a trail down the watershed. He noted that in building a trail down a narrow watershed doesn't just change the area under pavement but what it does when you cut a narrow ribbon like Nine Mile Creek into two very much narrower pieces is you eliminate the ability of the wildlife to continue to sustain itself in those narrow corridors so it will have an impact and he would like for the Park Board to consider that. W Amanda Simons, 5725 Olinger Drive, informed the Park Board that she and her husband are new residents of Edina. She noted that they are young professionals and are avid bike riders who use the greenways and grand rounds almost daily for exercise and often for transportation to work. She added that many of her peers and colleagues also use these trails. She pointed out that one of their sadness about living in Edina is that there is not a connection to the greenway through Edina which means they have to use the roads. She stated that although Edina may have a share the road program it does not always protect her from cars coming too close. She indicated they think that the creek -based route would be better for safety with all of the trail crossings. For example, trail crossings in Hopkins and St. Louis Park that go through stop signs that while bikers often stop the cars do not often see the bikers that may already be in the trail. Ms. Simons stated that she would like the Park Board to think about young professionals like herself who are interested in moving to Edina but are also interested in the transportation and exercise of the regional trails. Paul Ratelle, 5521 Valley Lane, stated that he is vehemently against the creek -based route. He noted that he lives in Section 9 which is going to be directly affected by the creek - based bike trail. He indicated that it has not been easy for residents to work with the Three Rivers, they have been uniformly dismissive of the concerns that they've tried to raise to them. He stated that it's important to the residents to know what they intend to build through the creek and where they intend to build it. He indicated that when they talked to Bonestroo they were put off with the comment "we don't really know where the placement is going to be, we weren't asked to consider that when we evaluated and prepared our environmental assessment worksheet." He noted Ms. Grissman made a reference to a 2003 study on the negative impacts on property values where a bike trail occurs next to or adjacent to a particular property. Mr. Grissman pointed out that 2003 study has been in the Three Rivers files since it was prepared. He noted that the conclusion that was reached by Ms. Shilcox, who prepared the study, shows homes that are adjacent to these types of trails their values go down. She knows it and Three Rivers knows it, it isn't a matter of debate and it isn't a question of dollars and cents per foot from the trail. He stated that his concern is they need to work with the people about what's going to be built and where it's going to be built because the trail is going right across their backyards. He commented if they can't work cooperatively with Thee Rivers, as has been evidenced so far with their contact with them, it's going to be a big issue in the community and he urges the Park Board to take that into consideration. Diane Fansler, 5709 W. 66`h Street, indicated that she is a 30 year resident of Edina and lives in the Route 7 area and feels like it is a route from nowhere to nowhere. She stated that it's supposed to be starting at Tracy Avenue heading south along the east side of Valley View Road and Route 7 ends at Antrim Road. She noted the cost they were given for 5f, which is where it's supposed to be connecting to the north side is $2,600,000, Route 7 is $600,000. She pointed out that she was very surprised tonight when she heard Ms. Grissman say they've added Antrim Road to Route 7. She noted there is no funding in that $600,000 for Antrim Road which is supposed to go along the east side of Antrim Road and connect with Route 8, which is 70`h Street. She noted that Antrim Road has 7 houses on the east side; it has Calvary Lutheran Church with at least two commercial driveways and has at least two or three hydrants which would have to be changed and give driveways. She added that six houses would be within 25 feet of the route of the trail. She explained that if you go to the north end, 5f which was incidentally added after the CAT assessment, it ends where you cross the ramp on highway 62 and it's just supposed to magically join up with Valley View there. She noted that in that section there is a.4 mile gap that has not been considered in anything. She commented that they are 10 supposed to be building a ten foot wide trail with three feet of green space on each side by eliminating a six foot sidewalk at Valley View and eliminating the shoulder /park lane. She stated we have to do the winter plowing in there because that's the main pedestrian route for the students to get to the High School and Valley View Middle School. She pointed out that all of the snow, construction and maintenance would be on private property because they are proposing to take it to the very end of the right -of -way. She stated that the section, the .4 mile that's missing between the on ramp of Highway 62 up to Valley Lane or West 66`x' Street wherever you happen to take it, that's missing there is no six foot sidewalk there, there is no parking/shoulder lane that is the, there are two lanes going north bound. She also has safety issues. TG Clifford, 6500 Creek Drive, showed the Park Board photos of the connection of Route 9 and Route 11 near Heights Park. He also showed photos of the creek level in March of 2010 and in August 2010. He pointed out that the water level in August was actually higher than in March. He commented that he wanted to show photos from March because without the vegetation you have a better view of the actual water level. Mr. Clifford pointed out that in this case you have a floodway where water rushes down and needs to be drained from the area and is going to be a difficult place to put a trail. He stated that he assumes the Park Board members volunteered not to debate regional trails but to look at park programs, playground equipment, ball fields, etc., things for the community. However, what's happened is you've ended up being involved in a discussion and decision about a regional trail. He indicated that he feels the primary duty of the Park Board members is to be stewards of our parks. He noted that he specifically wants the Park Board to consider what's going to happen to Walnut Ridge Park and Heights Park if the trail goes through. He noted that Height's Park serves two neighborhoods, both on each side of the creek and if the regional trail goes through one of those neighborhoods will be disconnected from the neighborhood playground with bicyclists. He stated that two million cyclists a year on 100 miles of trails translates to about 21,000 visits per mile per year for an additional seven miles of trails. He noted that he thinks we need to ask ourselves can kids safely visit their neighborhood park if that trail goes through sections 9 and 11. Laurie Chapman, 6420 Aspen Rd., stated that she lives about 25 feet from the creek and she will be sacrificing her privacy and her quality of life in the interest of the greater majority. She indicated that all of the residents that live on the creek side will be living with the pictures previously shown of the boardwalks. She knows others want this but she will have to live with it 24/7. She noted that this is about property values and showed photos of her current view and what it will look like. She stressed that she has a very hard time believing that her property values will not go down. Ms. Chapman explained that every time it rains she goes out to collect all of the junk that collects just trying to go through the creek. She noted her concern about all of the junk that will collect in all of the pilings that are going to support a 12 foot by 12 foot wide wooden bridge across the creek and questioned who will take care of that. She pointed out that it's not even accessible so she wonders how they are going to get to the creek to clean it up. She noted that she also hopes that the Park Board would consider the idea of building a ten ton bridge through valuable wet lands for over 20 million dollars in these economic times that will steal the privacy and the quality of life of those people who live on the creek side in exchange for 8 months of recreational use. She commented that there are so many questions that are unanswered that this may not be a good idea to build this bridge at this time. Alice Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, indicated that she has been a member of the Park Board; she is currently a member of the Bike Edina Task Force and has been participating with the CAT team as well. She noted she would like to thank the Three Rivers Park District; they have done a wonderful job, answered every question and have been extremely professional. She added that 11 they have been one of the best organizations that she has worked with. She stated that now is the time to do this and that the trail system has expanded since she saw the first tier regional trail abstract in 2002. It will actually connect to something where before it couldn't get across the rail road tracks. She noted the first regional trail system helped Edina connect to Hopkins but it really didn't add too much. However, now with the explosion of the trail system we have now it's going to add greatly. Ms. Hulbert commented that one thing that hasn't been mentioned is that this is going to be a combined project to improve the environment of the creek as it currently exists. She noted that it's her understanding that when the creek restoration is done the flooding will improve and there won't be the issue of water running all over and debris washing up and causing dams. She indicated that the trail is going to let the rest of the residents of Edina access to that area. She stated that the bridges they may be able to construct across Highway 62 and Highway 100 for pedestrians and bikes to be able to cross without traffic is going to be a tremendous addition to the community. She indicated that she believes Three Rivers put in a grant application last year for a bridge and it was denied because it didn't hook to anything; however, with the trail approved and an alignment there is a much better chance of getting the money. She explained that the funding for this is going to come from grants and the potential for getting the grants approved have to do with the quality of the project. Dorothy Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, indicated that she is kind of neutral, she has two avid bikers in her family and she lives across Bredesen Park. She stated that she did attend a meeting at South View this summer and was at a planning Commission meeting. She noted that apparently she lives in section 5f and they seemed to not have had a representative to answer questions because she has a lot of questions about where the trail is going. She commented that she also thinks now is not the time, they can't afford it and right now there are too many things going on in Edina that are still unresolved. She stated that they need to save and wait. There needs to be more community participation, send letters out to people within 1,000 feet. She added that she never heard anything about this bike trail until seven months ago so if that could be addressed they would appreciate it in their neighborhood. David Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, asked the Park Board to recommend against using the Section 9 alignment which is the creek -based route. He noted that they believe the section 9 alignment will destroy their privacy, their quality of life and their property values. He indicated that he hopes the Park Board has taken the opportunity to walk this very small area so you know how incredibly destructive a boardwalk would be in this area. It is not an issue that fence or some vegetation can remedy. He commented that the residents are going to pay dearly and while Mr. Keprios alluded briefly to these facts in his recommendation letter he later mentioned that property owners have no right to expect that the city will not develop the land in a manner it sees fit. He noted that they strongly disagree and that neighborhoods are built on the premise that each of us will keep and use our properties in a manner that will not undermined our neighbor's quiet enjoyment of their properties. He pointed out that even though they own their homes they are not free to convert them into retail stores, hotels or health clubs because to do that would be detrimental to their neighbor's quiet enjoyment and their property values and therefore the city would not allow it. However, now the city is considering changing the use of a completely natural area within the neighborhood into a greater metropolitan thoroughfare that will funnel an estimated 500,000 users' just feet from their decks, patios and swing sets. He commented that in effect the city is saying it has the right to be a bad neighbor, it's saying that it has the right to harm our privacy our quality of life and our property values to which they disagree. Mr. Thompson stressed that they believe that the city should abide by the same land use conventions that protect the rights of the residents in the neighborhood. He noted his final point is they don't have to argue about property values, the Park Board should ask Three Rivers Park District to 12 commission an appraisal, an independent appraisal of what will happen to property values along the creek. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, indicated that he would first like to give a vote of confidence to the Three Rivers Park Planning group. He indicated that he didn't quite agree with the setup of the CAT team in how it was put together, but he has absolute confidence in the objectivity that Three Rivers has done to come up with the facts. He stated that it was their job to come up with interpretations that would be the most fitting for the terrain and the job of the city is to make decisions based on what they found. Therefore, he has no fault in the thoroughness which they have done and he has been watching this for a very long time. He informed the Park Board that he has biked most of the major bike trails in Minnesota and added that some of the trails come very, very close to people's properties. He indicate that this past summer he biked the entire length of the Chicago Park Forest Preserve, which is one of the most densely populated areas in America and homes are very close to the creek. He noted that in all of the years and places he has biked he has never heard a negative comment about neighbors and homes being too close to a bike path. He pointed out that he has never seen, even in the Chicago area, graffiti, trash or anything else that would detract from the neighborhood. Mr. Persha stressed that he thinks this is the most opportune time to make a bike path because the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is repairing the land with a restoration project. Therefore, it's a chance to save hundreds of thousands of dollars if the two projects are done together. He commented that if it's not done he doesn't think this project will ever come again to Edina. He asked for the Park Board's support for the project from a safety standpoint, a user standpoint and to treat the communities that are adjacent to us as a unit. Bob Lubar, 6619 Londonderry Dr., indicated that he thinks they need to take a serious look at the engineering aspects of building through the creek and what it could mean and have they done the due diligence necessary so that they can make a recommendation going forward. He noted that if the creek -based route is developed as proposed it would result in approximately 6600 linear feet of wood deck timber boardwalk, this is equivalent to a bridge that is 1 V4 miles long. He added that much of the boardwalk will be constructed within the hundred year flood plain and/or the Nine Mile Creek flood plain. He stated that the boardwalk will be approximately 10 to 12 feet high and 12 feet wide with the enclosed railings and pilings every 12 to 20 feet and has a ten ton capacity bridge suitable for supporting vehicle traffic. He commented it will be built parallel to the stream which is very significant; the intended design is similar to building a bridge above a stream rather than across a stream. He explained that a structure of this nature with its entire length in the current of the water when it's flooding can be expected to trap debris during periods of heavy water run off which will increase the level of flood water and increase maintenance costs. He pointed out that when the creek is running right next to it, when that water is flowing, it's going to catch on one piling and if it misses that piling it's going to catch on the other and the likelihood of creating a dam and creating collateral damage due to the flooding is huge. He stated as a homeowner whose property backs up to the wetlands he has a vested interest in assuring that the proposed bridge along the creek performs as intended. Mr. Lubar asked what experience Three Rivers have with building a wood deck bridge located in a stream floodway because it is critical that there is no incremental risk of flood damage resulting from the implementation of this project. He asked how will Three Rivers protect the elevated trail and surrounding wetlands from accumulation of debris and how are they going to remove all of the debris. In addition, how will the bridge be maintained in the winter because he knows the traverse decking and rail system will prevent efficient plowing and given the railings on the side it will be virtually impossible to get a traditional plow system down the lumber as well as tearing up the lumber. Therefore, the next question becomes will it be 13 incumbent upon the city to buy additional capital equipment so that they can maintain this bridge work. Mr. Lubar asked does Three Rivers Park have sufficient operating funds to support this high maintenance project well into the future and what actions will the city take to guarantee performance now and in the future. Dan Atkins, 6812 Chapel Lane, quoted Theodore Roosevelt "Unite People in connection with the heartbreakingly gorgeous land they share ". He noted that the last word he thinks is the key "share" this land we all "share" and we all want to be able to use it. He stated that he thinks everybody needs to consider being on the right side of history and not what's the right decision for now or December or November elections but for next year or even 10, 50 or 100 years from now. George Rerat, 6620 Londonderry Dr., informed the Park Board that they are putting together a Parkwood Group to support Walnut Ridge, if you look at the neighborhood in Parkwood Knolls as it exists today it is a great community asset that is used by everybody who lives around that park. He stated that when you are talking about this trail you are talking about the users coming from a small distance to enjoy it for exercise, for nature and for community building. He indicated that Walnut Ridge already does this and if that trail is brought in you are going to get rid of that. He pointed out that the current trail is a nice circle and if you go there any night after work you are going to see kids riding their bikes, parents walking their dogs and stopping to talk to neighbors and it's disheartening to think you want to disrupt Walnut Ridge Park the way it is. He noted that the kids play tennis, hockey, lacrosse and softball; these are all of the different things the park is currently used for by all of the neighbors and nobody wants to see that changed. Routing the path through that park just disrupts what's already good and they don't have to spend any money to change it and therefore doesn't like the idea of it going through the park. He noted that the neighborhood is putting together a petition that they will bring to the City Council that will have a lot of signatures on it stating that they don't want the trail to go through Walnut Ridge Park. Mr. Rerat stated that the other thing is he doesn't know why they are in such a hurry, if they miss the deadline for 2015 -2016 there will be funding available for 2017 -2018; it's not like funding is going to disappear. He commented why don't they let Richfield and portions of Lake Minnetonka as well as portions of all of these other areas get built so we could learn from them what the best practices are for design, building, maintenance, etc. They could learn from their mistakes rather than us jumping in now when we don't have all of the facts, we don't know what we are doing. He indicated it might be prudent to wait and learn what works and what doesn't and then have Edina step in knowing the best practices. He stated that he thinks they are rushing to a decision for Three Rivers Park, not for the benefit of Edina. Bruce Jackson, 5716 Continental Dr., stated that he has three general comments. First, he thinks the road versus creek -based option is sort of a false choice and that they should have the ability to select the best route for any particular segment. He noted that while he may be opposed to Route 2 he may like the bridge over Highway 62 from Bredesen to the High School and thinks that might be a valuable addition to the community. Second, the community survey does not provide the data to justify this trail or the selection of the creek versus the road -based option or any particular section on this trail because the survey instrument is flawed; it is not designed to answer those questions. Finally, he would challenge the assertion that Edina not be connected to the Regional Trail system if we chose not to do this project. He noted that he thinks the community has made tremendous progress in building up its bike trails locally and he is sure that they can continue to do so even if they do not participate in this project. 14 Joseph Hulbert MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT IF NECESSARY. Todd Fronek MOVED, Dan Peterson SECONDED. Ms. Steel asked Mr. Keprios to talk about why he would prefer the route of the trail to go along the south side of Walnut Ridge Park when the north side had been proposed to avoid flooding issues. Mr. Keprios explained that when he looks at the impact on the park both the entrance and the exit would remain the same. He noted that having it go along the south side it would keep it further away from the hockey rink yet close enough to the building so that people will still have access to the restroom facilities. He added that's also a shorter route and it's the shortest distance between two points so he suspects that a lot of people using the trail will take that route naturally so therefore in his view it makes more sense. Mr. Hulbert indicated that he thinks he is speaking for everyone when he says this has been a long and emotional process. He noted that all of the neighbors want what is best for the parks, but ultimately he thinks the number one issue in his mind is if we were to consider some sort of a trail, safety is a major issue for him so in his mind a creek -based alignment is the safest option. He stated that he realizes this is not going to be a popular opinion with a lot of people who feel like they are losing privacy. He commented that he also sees the formation of a trail through Edina as a way to encourage our neighbors to get outside, enjoy the parks and connect with the community. Mr. Hulbert pointed out that they have received hundreds of a -mails and letters and one that stood out and kind of separated the emotion from the decision was from former City Council member Scott Johnson. He wrote "the proposed creek -based route is a logical and wise use of public land for a healthy environmentally sound project which will be of enormous benefit to the community and all who use it. The project involves no taking of private land, and while understandably of concern to those joining the path, it is a predictable public use of public lands for the public good ". He stated that is where he stands and thinks it ultimately would be a good amenity for our community and, although not popular with everybody, any decision that is made is not going to be popular with everybody. Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks this presents our community with an amazing opportunity and they have heard a lot of the benefits of trails. However, he thinks they need to have some more careful thoughtful planning. He indicated that to him the rail line is the way to go and he understands the CP is not playing ball right now and it is certainly a frustration; however, if they are looking to connect to these regional trails that's where it's got to go. He added that is where Three Rivers has the most experience in building these trails. Mr. Fronek explained that looking from the comprehensive Bike Plan and at the demographics; the Edina population is more densely concentrated in the northeast quadrant. Those people are going to be able to utilize a trail along the CP line a lot more. Also, to the extent that you want to encourage commuting he doesn't think that the Nine Mile trail necessarily encourages that. He thinks the CP rail provides the best connection for Edina. He stressed if it's not the time now, then we should get CP to the table and figure it out. Mr. Dummer stated that he thinks what's important to note here is that no matter what decision it is whether its road or creek as Mr. Keprios stated that if we build it we will use it. He noted that we have to take into account that high school kids are going to be able to utilize this to get to school and to navigate through the City of Edina. He indicated that he thinks it's important to see how it will be a positive effect on Edina. Mr. Pronove stated that in addition to what Mr. Dummer said is that he has actually joined several classes that go outside and use the fields and explained that it's kind of tough to 15 get out of the premises from down below. He noted that basically you have to go up either stairwells or back into the parking lot back outside or you have to go out bushwhacking. He noted that with this he thinks they could actually go out for other studies like science and such things. He stated that he also thinks it might help with some of the traffic congestion around release time because it would help more kids have the ability to walk to school. Ms. Steel pointed out that she had an eye opening experience at the last Park Board meeting when they were looking at the CIP. She noted that she didn't realize how expensive it is to repair the asphalt paths. She indicated that looking at the Needs Assessment Survey and seeing how many residents want new bikes trails and walking opportunities that she doesn't know if as a city they can really provide the amount that the community needs. Therefore, she sees this as an opportunity for the Park District to step in and address our needs. She added that the Edina taxpayers have been funneling money to the Park District and she thinks it's time they benefit from what they have put in. Dan Peterson MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE PARK BOARD PROPOSE TO THE CITY COUNCIL A CREEK -BASED REGIONAL TRAIL WITH THE ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS AS PROPOSED BY STAFF REGARDING THE TRAIL ALIGNMENT THROUGH WALNUT RIDGE PARK, EASEMENT RIGHTS, BUFFERS AND THE ISSUES INVOLVING BOARDWALKS AND TO WORK IN A LEGAL TIME FRAME FOR A START AND FINISH OF THE PROJECT. Louise Segreto SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Peterson commented that what he found interesting at the joint meeting was when the chairman of Three Rivers stated that if Edina does nothing and passes on a trail there will be bike trails coming through Edina. They are just not going to be particularly safe because people who ride their bikes want to come from Minnetonka, Hopkins, Richfield, Bloomington, etc., and Edina happens to be right in the middle of it. Mr. Peterson stated that they might as well do it and they might as well do it right for the future of the city and the future of our families and they might as well do it safely. IN FAVOR: Jennifer Kenney, Louise Segreto, Bill Lough, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Ellen Jones, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus OPPOSED: Todd Fronek ABSTAINED: Randy Meyer MOTION CARRIED. W. pyr ILWOOOL"IDYLIVOOD DR LV L AVE FAXONY RD ;5T" ST V/ 4 ENT AVE t I 16 OLL 6 .1K, OAK DA ,,E LN I, RD VIE E 56TH ST W ,IH S6TH ST I.' Q HAWKES TER WOUNF TER 56T. ST N 2 TOealk ST 8) "'WUODI�W) PD -�T V. 4i� C, E%1 .. . 57TH > ORO 2 CrROVE ST GROVE ST ST SGTH ST W '11Y D SOT. 5T ati,. 0 SEUT011 AvE RD IF Z S2IH ,T 59TH �7 Y REtI DATA PAR#, LAIIGPORD OR A PE� R� OuL WIN Q 4 6 F C '(115T ST 60TH STV.— = 0 ul 6114 1!0, CIRCLE DR JEFF PL 14 EIIRc-C11 CTIC11 62ND ST V, C) GLEASOH C:1 MADDOX LN -,T :1 At1BE IL Q MCCAULE), 0111AL WAY AR(kI50?W, b3RD ST W ;E VP HERIT ly 0 n62 Q q 4 PLO E U YH oc, 0 64TH $T er Oh VA C 0 8 Z Q T9 Q. 65TH IT Vi "or LN 0 _1j ILLS RD . 0 — I I r P 66TH ST W 5 51 w 0 APACHE RD 0 5E CREI C4,1,,1 ,LOIS Ul "E" 0' Z 1AG0 A via SUSAN AVE vALLEV VI RD 68TH ST w BALFAW RD cosPEL OR PAJU, 4FR tF" BROOK DR It.,, WTH Si w 100 ORD WAq 69TH 5T V. ',T TRIti 4/cCiuIRL RD o" 11001 P 4 V ,JIIBERR� (fl 4. 41,RCX?OMS, I 70TH ST VI V Legend ----------- - ANDuvrP PD MAVELLE OR a M 13 BELVIDERE 04 0 HAZELT014 P Creek-Based Route 0 " A Alternative Trail Routes" 73RD ST W 100 OP -"',tLL DP 1ER _ 5E Alternative Trail Route Number DEWEY HILL AD VE 1952 D 74TH ST W 20 -2 0 PLAZA D POP Miles N 76TH ST Vi 76TH ST VV 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 U Q Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect `L w V, 4i) (3 1�) conceptual trail corridor and does not depict actual trail alignment. 0 ;117H %,IKIIIG DRS VV 28 This GIs Data is provided 'as is' without warranty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts the limitations of the Data, including the fact that the Data is dynamic and Is in a C reek-based option constant state of maintenance, correction, and update. Mali prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Section - KKG 06-2010 I0Y0000 LIIIDYLIYOOD DR P •'. I - . - W1111)" OP AVE AI�Ei+ _ I O 1 IJOLL \`\ - NSAvntIY RD - ppt EIIT AVE ^ OAN 5 HST V1 ._._- 16 9 ,E Ln EF RU LT a 56TH ST Yl _ - fbrE - O s , _ SSTH 5T W OR 1V01111F. TER _ I O 567H ST YI t .. HAWINES TER a 56TH ST VI x q m . DOVRF DR n g O m T m W 1 TU:JEP S- a _ ,_ SUVTHVIEVJ LJV , L G1A11 H ST W 4 .n ARKIJOOU LI U a 1,£a PI = _ _ 57T 'j .. - BRFH RD w , a `a $ ,. q w_....I -'OPO (. a.._. O GROVE 57 Ww- oP.O':E ST ,n DPHttBROOY.( L'1 fsT� D R a f �. 7 PNY D I rci _t G SETH ST I•: w . w _ 5 _ 59TH ST :r -. ¢ RBYV O BEnT011 AVE - 4 OAS.. RD Un PD a w w •u '^ a w /' '^ w •i S97H ST VI ' w a i 59TH S T v PEI �JY "F d �/ ` w T .t w u• EL)I11:� v v\OOL RD a z .¢i W .^ A .. -.._ I „? i� P l -_. i 60TH 5T 1•r '� `. J 6 k a - - E rrpl O JEa \ \Op Y 61St 5r 1Y �.. _ /Ii,.� o i yi 60TH ST \ = .. )EFF PIL �_ s a' O a 62110` 7CIRCLEDP 1. 5P a[P L;rCR W a CTIC GLEASptI - - Ftr'DUO' 6214D 5T 41 7LBERiI FL AMCCAULgp r}011IAL Vlny _ _ Gf ValSC,; r1 w j v RD .T a 61PG 5T :'; f Q a q H£g1tP IE DR It, - `-i A'E•r 62 O w 4 u1 nvE W IIMO£R 10c, w ut W 6.11157 I! q L :W q }9TH ST V: a x .. h 2 - _ 65TH ST W \� Ry1r107RL w RAMER 1. 14 it LS R .U. D -. F a ' • PEL£V PV 66TH 66TH ST W }. ST 0 7 APACHE RD p -- 4 •, 4 61 Ltl t DP "4 "IL Tut1 PG rRt 0 v f SUSAN = J f7f yffis i i i LAGUNP VALLEY 'AEYI RD -�-. —_ 61TT 7 - ° h. 0 PA11< RD N I NPPEL OR • o G,;11 O ? m UP °fp AL W - 9U F% PA)Uf. G BRO - m a Pit 1OO I. ", TFa 69T t. ST '. i A r� W _ 1' _.. f0* Y - s 64TH 5T W w r y r O i - ER11f NCGUIRE RV nFTOpO ` D Y1P VIIBERRY 69TH ST W 1. W - RCRO I I 1 s ,. -. .oTH ST Y�.�..��,- rte -i"'— _.__._. Legend n ANDOVER RD MAVELLE DR U O Oh �13 \ BFIVIDERE t1 �. m v ¢ L Road Based Route ? o g_4 , ° gSiAf cUgE 5 HAZELTor1 P V n p . °s 7113RD ORE Alternative Trail Routes" W & fL(SIYUpTH DR w N ST :r 'IOO F0j1pELL DR rc v ! .. E0. PR 5E p DEVJEY HILL PR m o 10 g 3 Alternative Trail Route Number ,� y ^ 4 74TH ST I.1 E 19 -2 af,RKLA14/y n4E 20 -2 v n CLAZA D Miles ^- Q 0 0.25 a.5 0.75 1 Iv l u 76TH 5T YY 0 76TH ST J J Lr J :J 1'1 * Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect 77TH ST ; r \i� t°u (31 s conceptual trail corridor and does not depict 1 - _ U b� 8TH VIKIf1G DR r11f111E50TA DR actual trail alignment. g ST I,- r h This GIS Data is provided -as 1s without warranty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. The Road-.basedoption Data user acknowledges the fact and accepts is dynamic the Data, Including the fact that the Data is d namic and Is in a constant state of maintenance, correction, and update. Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Section - KKG 06 -2010 Walnut Ridge Park Recommendation to route the regional trail following the existing trail on the south side of the park Recommended Southern Route MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT COMMISSION HELD AT SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 7:04 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Members of the Three Rivers Park District Commission in attendance were: Chair Larry Blackstad, and Commissioners Marilynn Corcoran, Rosemary Franzese, Barbara Derus Kinsey, Dale Woodbeck, and Sara Wyatt. Three Rivers Park District staff in attendance were: Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning; Cris Gears, Superintendent; Boe Carlson, Associate Superintendent; Don DeVeau, Director of Planning and Development; Jonathan Vlaming, Chief of Planning, and Ciara Schlichting, Planner with Bonestroo. Attending from Edina's staff was John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director. PRESENTATION MADE — NINE MILE REGIONAL TRAIL Park and Recreation Director Keprios welcomed all to the joint work session and explained the purpose of tonight's meeting was to formally present study results on the Nine Mile Creek regional trail and provide an opportunity for the Edina City Council to ask questions of the Three Rivers Park District Commissioners and staff. He advised that a public hearing would be scheduled at a future date and encouraged residents to submit questions in writing for response by staff. Mr. Keprios thanked all who had participated in this process and acknowledged the attendance of Edina Park Board Members in the audience. Mr. Keprios recapped the ten -year process under which this trail had been considered and support of the Edina City Council for the Three Rivers Park District to implement a regional trail corridor and complete an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for potential segments within the City of Edina. Three Rivers Park District Senior Manager of Planning Grissman welcomed all to the meeting and provided a presentation detailing the project background; maps depicting the District's regional trail system, creek -based and road -based routes for review and consideration; and, next steps to take. She stated the intent was to develop one preferred route through Edina. Ms. Grissman displayed graphs that summarized resident survey results that identified 86% of respondents indicated a need for walking and bike trails; 66% indicated a need for natural areas and wildlife habitat; 64% ranked park and recreational facilities as being the most important; and, 66% indicated a willingness to fund walking and biking trails with additional tax dollars. Following a presentation of the City's 2007 Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and Plan maps, Ms. Grissman advised of the composition and role of the Community Assessment Team (CAT), which was established by the City to review all routes under consideration. The CAT also gathered and prioritized information related to social, technical and economic factors, and conducted a voluntary environmental assessment. The voluntary environmental assessment concluded that potential environmental impacts were addressable in design, permitting, construction, and operation phases so an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not warranted. She explained wetland impacts identified in the environmental assessment and how the impacts would be mitigated within the immediate area. With regard to wildlife, it was determined the only impacted regulated species was the Blandings Turtle and that potential affect would be addressed, if needed. Ms. Grissman reviewed the opportunities available for public input and indicated that all public comments had been compiled and summarized. Of the 118 comments received indicating support for the trail, only one preferred the road -based route. Comments expressing objections were based on the costs being too high, environmental concerns, the trail being unsafe for non -trail users, and that priority should not be given to recreational trails. Ms. Grissman described the alignment for each segment of a creek -based route and displayed pictures depicting different types of trail construction including boardwalks. She then described the alignment of each segment of a road -based route and displayed examples of road -based trails. Ms. Grissman stated the third alternative was no trail within Edina, creating a gap in the regional trail system. Ms. Grissman presented the considerations determined by the CAT that the most important items to be considered were the number of adjacent homes, distance of the home to the trail, driveway /roadway crossings, availability of right -of -way, and what the trail would cost. A chart was displayed that detailed each of CAT's findings including pros and cons for a creek -based route and a road -based route. Ms. Grissman advised that if a route was not found in Edina, the District's funds would be directed to other park projects and access to the Edina High School complex north of Highway 62 would continue to be on sidewalks along Gleason and Tracy Avenues. With regard to project costs, Ms. Grissman stated that a creek -based route was estimated at $20 million and a road -based route was estimated at $17 million. Operations and maintenance costs for the entire regional trail was $185,000 annually regardless of type of route. She noted that about 20 -25% of the project cost was for the two bridges over Highways 62 and 100. Ms. Grissman reviewed financing options for capital costs and partnership opportunities and indicated it was not anticipated to raise local property taxes to fund these costs. Operation and maintenance costs were funded from the District's general operating fund that included property taxes and funds from the Metropolitan Council. Ms. Grissman explained the approval process through the Edina Park Board, Edina City Council, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, School District, and finally the Three Rivers Park District. She stated that if the project moved forward implementation steps would include: completion of a master plan, cooperative trail agreement, securing of trail easements, grant applications, and once funding was in place construction would commence. The federal grant application for funding in 2015 and 2016 was due June of 2011 so a project decision would be needed from the Edina City Council by March of 2011. If the project were not approved by that point, the trail segment would be delayed by an additional two years. ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION HELD Mayor Hovland commented that the regional trail was one of the most important issues to face Edina and that the Council was committed to analyze all of the data, gather comments, and analyze the facts before reaching a conclusion. He indicated this topic would be on the Council's October 5, 2010, meeting agenda for discussion of the process and to consider whether the matter should be referred to the Park Board and other entities for analysis and recommendation. Mayor Hovland recognized the attendance of CAT members and expressed the City's appreciation for their contribution. He described the steps that would be followed and emphasized that the Council was mindful and sensitive to the resident's interests and would continue to be so throughout the process. He indicated that when the matter was finished, he would like the City to say they had worked on it as a community and regardless of the outcome would remain a community. The Council raised the issue of a 35 mph speed limit for bicycles on the trail. Associate Superintendent Carlson advised that the Three Rivers Park District does not have an ordinance to set an arbitrary speed limit. Rather, it was based on utilizing trails under a manner of control for existing conditions. He indicated that all trails were multi -use. The Council asked if the Three Rivers Park District would fund the preferred route whether it was creek -based or road - based. Superintendent Gears stated the Three Rivers Park District Board does fund different types of trails, both on- and off -road. In this case, the Board would review whatever route the City preferred, the cost in relationship to other District projects, and make a decision on funding. Three Rivers Park District Board Chair Blackstad explained that regardless of trail location, the intended funding was a federal grant covering 80% of the cost and requiring a 20% match from other entities, some of which could come from the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget. Mr. Carlson advised that a creek -based trail may score better with a federal grant and whether road- or creek - based, funding may include federal, state, and other entity funding. With regard to maintenance of trails, Mr. Carlson indicated the Three Rivers Park District was responsible for the trail improvements and maintenance. Mr. Gears advised that in addition to regional rail corridors, the Three Rivers Park District also had more than 200 miles of paved trails, many built under conditions similar to Edina's alignments. Both operations and maintenance costs were paid through a separate capital fund, and the District maintained a pavement condition data base to assure all trails were in a safe condition for users. The Council asked whether the EAW addressed potential impacts to nearby homes from heaving construction equipment during boardwalk installation. Ciara Schlichting, Bonestroo Planner, stated they recommend that construction in wetland areas occur during the winter when the ground is frozen and potential for impact was greatly minimized. Director of Planning and Development DeVeau stated the District had no information that led them to believe construction of boardwalks in summer or winter would impart any construction impacts to residential or adjoining properties. He advised that boardwalks do not use extremely deep footings. The Council discussed the timing of construction and asked if 2015 would be the earliest date for project commencement. Ms. Grissman stated there might be some immediate opportunities in some locations if the trail project was done concurrently with road reconstruction projects contained in the City's CIP. With regard to financing, Mr. Gears stated the District may borrow money to construct earlier than receipt of federal grant funds in 2015 or 2016. It was indicated that during summer sporting events, the parking lots at Edina City Parks along the proposed routes were oftentimes full. The need for parking was discussed by the Council, and the question arose whether additional parking lots would be constructed. Ms. Grissman stated the District believed existing parking lots in City parks, on- street parking, and other parking infrastructure could be capitalized so they would not anticipate constructing new parking lots Chief of Planning Vlaming indicated that over one -half of regional trail users lived within three - fourths of a mile from the trail. Thus, they would not expect most trail users to drive a vehicle to and from the trail system. In addition, the District's maps identify locations of parking lots and designated trailheads, as preferred by local authorities. Mr. Vlaming assured the Council that the creek -based trail would have sufficient points of access. Three Rivers would work with Edina as to which parking lots, parks and bathrooms would be named on their map if any. The Council asked how much boardwalk was being contemplated with a creek -based route, especially in segments 9 and 11, and whether that information would be available in advance of the Council's decision. Ms. Grissman advised of the off -road trail segments that would incorporate a boardwalk and explained that the exact percentage would be determined during the design and development stage. Mr. Vlaming provided a detailed description of locations where boardwalk was proposed. With regard to the height of the boardwalk above the surface and vertical dimension including railing, Ms. Grissman explained that level of detail would be determined during the design and development stage and would depend on the regulatory agency since requirements vary. She stated in general, boardwalks were constructed two to three feet above the ordinary high water mark with 42 inches from the decking to the railing. Mr. Vlaming suggested a good example of boardwalks would be the Luce Line Regional Trail where the boardwalk could not be seen from the road and vice versa. Ms. Grissman explained that boardwalk would only be constructed in designated wetlands. The trail would be built at grade if located in a floodplain. Mr. Gears stated the District would prepare a map that identified areas where boardwalks were anticipated at designated wetlands. The Council next addressed screening between the trail and private property and asked if it was the responsibility of the District or homeowner. Mr. Carlson stated the Dakota Trail was an existing railroad corridor, adding in many cases the private property had encroached on the railroad easement. In some areas, the railroad sold property to the private property owner so they could improve their property. Mr. Carlson explained with the Dakota Trail project District staff had met with each resident who had concerns relative to privacy or limited easement areas. Cooperatively, District staff and property owners identified vegetative or fencing solutions. The District paid for all pediments, fencing, and improvements made within the right - of -way. In some instances the property owner chose to do something (plantings or fences) on their own property and in that case the property owner paid for the improvement. Mr. Carlson reviewed the screening options available that included berming, a variety of vegetation, and wooden board -on -board or split rail fencing. Mr. Carlson explained that Three Rivers Park District was responsible for downed tree removal and would work cooperatively with City staff if they became aware of a maintenance issue. He noted that trail signage included guidelines, courtesy messages, and contact telephone numbers. The Council asked the District to address how it handled its current debt and additional debt for this segment of trail. Mr. Gears stated the District had a ten -year project forecast and within that ten -year window, was anticipating a major expenditure for trails within first -tier suburbs. Each year, the District borrowed money for capital projects, but the District had also been able to retire bonds each year so it balanced with bonds being sold. In this case, the District would not borrow $20 million, since a federal grant would cover 80% of the costs, phased construction would be used, and other funding sources were available to lower the District's contribution. A discussion ensued regarding drafting a competitive federal grant application. Mr. Carlson advised that grant applications receive a higher score if the project was within a first -tier suburb with a high density. Other features that score well were tying in key elements to increase pedestrian flow such as pedestrian crossings over roadways and creating connectivity to schools and churches in areas with limiting freeway system boundaries. Mr. Gears stated funding agencies also looked at the number of street crossings managed or mitigated, usability and safety for the user, and whether the project was park/trail oriented or transportation oriented. Mr. Carlson commented that another component that scored well was the organization's ability to bring "money to the table" and sufficiently match money. He indicated the Three Rivers Park District was well positioned to receive a grant for this project because of its broad tax base. The Council noted bicycling was a popular activity in Edina. They asked if directness of the proposed route was a consideration. Chair Blackstad stated that was a consideration because if a route was not typically bicyclists would use the streets. He explained if this trail was not federally funded, the Three Rivers Park District would consider how this segment fit its priorities. It was noted that if the Edina segment was not constructed that would create a missing link for the entire region, not just the Three Rivers Park District. Three Rivers Park District staff was asked to provide the City with additional information on the percentage of boardwalk being contemplated, elevation and height of the boardwalk, sight lines from abutting properties, and building material that would mitigate noise impacts. Potential impact to butting residential property values was discussed. Mr. Carlson clarified that the issue was the proximity of the home to the trail, not the proximity of the property line to the trail. He advised the District had found that abutting property owners had no issues regarding safety or trash, and that was evident because there were no instances of police reports. Mr. Carlson stated their police department submits quarterly reports on every call received that identified the location and type of call. Those quarterly reports were reviewed by staff and the Board to determine if there were trends. Mr. Carlson advised that the largest complaint, system wide, was trail -on -trail activities like conflicts between a bicyclist and dog walker and patrons not obeying regulatory signage. In addition, there had been no serious accidents between bicyclist and pedestrian. The Council asked Ms. Grissman to provide internet links with respect to impact on property values as well as a study from Indiana on homes located near trails. Chair Blackstad referenced a study conducted in Hennepin County that found a positive correlation in home values if located along a trail that was equivalent to adding a fireplace or bedroom. With regard to public access to this data, Ms. Grissman stated the assessment findings were posted to the District's website, and they would research the study mentioned by Chair Blackstad because it may be relevant. The Council asked whether the police call data captured calls made to local police departments. Mr. Carlson stated the District's calls were dispatched through Hennepin County and if identified on a Hennepin County or Three Rivers Park District facility, the District took note of that call. The District may not get the call information if a local police officer responded or the call was not routed by the Hennepin County dispatch system, but the District police chief had a good working relationship with municipal police chiefs. Ms. Grissman and Mr. Keprios indicated that correspondence received from residents would be posted to the District and City websites within the next week or two. Three Rivers Park District Commissioner Corcoran advised of the District's "safety on wheels" that patrolled trails, created a "presence," and could help if something happened. She reviewed several areas in the metropolitan area where homes existed or had been constructed near regional trails and that when listed for sale; the trail proximity was highly marketed. Three Rivers Park District Commissioner Kinsey felt a key finding was that a road -based trail had 30 road crossings compared to 11 road crossings with a creek -based route. She stated she understood that a creek -based route was not popular with a number of homeowners, but the number of road crossings addressed a safety issue, which might also be a consideration to gain funding. The Council indicated it desired to have an effective voice in the final design process to assure impacts were minimized, noting three homes would be within 25 feet of a creek -based trail. Mr. DeVeau explained that every city had a different process so the District would ask for that acknowledgement from Edina on final design was welcomed. With regard to the City providing the trail easement to the Three Rivers Park District, Mr. Gears advised an easement was not ownership of property but the right to use the property for an exclusive use. He stated that having the easement would be directly tied to the District's ability to gain funding. Mr. Gears stated the District wanted to assure an investment of this size had a long life, and the term of the easement would have to be at least as long as the term for debt payments, typically 20 -25 years. The Council asked whether a conditional easement was an option in case trail funding was not obtained. Mr. Carlson assured the Council that the Three Rivers Park District would have no need to retain the easement if the trail was not constructed and would turn it back to the City. The Council asked about the contemplated width in segment 7 if a road -based route was selected. Ms. Grissman explained that in segment 7 the shoulder width would be narrowed or parking removed, and the design would have to still meet engineering and MSA standards. The Council discussed the proposed trail location in Walnut Ridge Park near the hockey rink and impact to trees. Mr. Gears stated the District would work with Edina to minimize impact to natural resources, trees, and close proximity to park amenities. Mr. Keprios stated at one point that trail alignment went through the south end of Walnut Ridge Park but was moved to the north because of water table and park use issues. He indicated the placement of this trail section might be worth revisiting. Chair Blackstad noted there had been no police reports on conflict with children crossing the trails. Mr. Keprios questioned application deadlines of which the Council should be mindful. Mr. Gears stated the District now had funding for first -tier trail construction in its ten -year plan, and the Edina project was high on the list for funding in the near term. He referenced the aforementioned federal grant application deadline of June of 2011, meaning a Council decision on a preferred route was needed by late February or early March. If not determined by that time, the District would apply for federal grant funds for another project and delay the Nine Mile Creek trail by two years. Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Watershed District Administrator, advised that the creek bank stabilization field assessment was funded in the Watershed District's 2011 budget. The streambank reconstruction would occur over several winter seasons, 2013 -2015, to minimize impact to soils and vegetation. He stated the Watershed District wanted to coordinate its streambank project with any trail construction to minimize disturbance. The Council complimented the Three Rivers Park District staff on its informative presentation and cooperative work with Edina's residents to gain their input. Chair Blackstad stated the District Board appreciated the opportunity to meet with the City Council and looked forward to working with Edina's Park Board and staff. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the joint work session adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 5, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Audio Copy of the September 29, 2010, Work Session available. Responses to Questions Asked at the 9/29/2010 .joint Work Session Are additional trailhead facilities proposed? Not at this time. There are several existing public parking, toilet and water facilities along the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail corridor that may also serve the needs of regional trail users. The Park District will work with the City to identify appropriate trailhead amenity locations on regional trail signage and in regional trail publications. If requested by the City, the Park District will consider additional trailhead amenities. What role does the City have in the design phase? The City is a critical project partner and a welcome participant in the design phase. The Park District and local communities typically collaborate to determine final trail alignment and design which works favorably for all parties, including local community members and adjacent property owners. This same collaboration is expected during the implementation of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. How do trails influence property values? There are many studies on the relationship of property value and proximity of trails. While different studies result in different findings, the national trend indicates a positive relationship between trails and property values. The 'Analysis of the Impacts of Bike and Recreation Trails on Suburban Property Values' study prepared for Hennepin County Community Works by Robert Luckow, supports these findings. The study concludes that as distance from the trail increases, the sales price of a home decreases. For the trail corridors and properties included in the study, property selling price decreases $2.99 for every additional foot of walking distance between the trail and subject property. This equates to a 5.8% increase in selling price for an average home adjacent to the trail compared to an average home located 4,300 feet from the trail. This study includes four regional trail corridors in Hennepin County and accounts for over ten variables which may influence property selling price. Who is responsible to build, maintain, operate, and fund the trail? The Park District is responsible for building, maintaining, operating and funding the regional trail. The Park District operates regional trails during spring, summer and fall. If the City of Edina elects to obtain a winter use permit, the City would assume maintenance and operation responsibilities during the winter months. How much will the trail cost, and how will the trail be funded? The preliminary planning phase trail construction estimate for the seven to eight miles of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in the City of Edina is between $17 and $20 million. The Park District anticipates utilizing a variety of funding sources and partnership opportunities to construct the regional trail. Potential funding sources and collaborative opportunities for the project may include: • Federal Surface Transportation Program/ Transportation Enhancement funds • Three Rivers Park District General Obligation Bonds • Metropolitan Council Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program funding • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Parks and Trails Legacy grant program funds • Other governmental agency partnerships Annual trail operation costs are an estimated $185,000. The primary funding source for operating costs is Three Rivers Park District property tax revenue, with some revenue received from the State of Minnesota as part of the Operations and Maintenance Fund allocations from the Metropolitan Council. What are the common public safety trends the Park District is observing and responding to along multi -use regional trail corridors? The two most significant trends Public Safety staff are observing and responding to are (1) bicycle trail users failing to stop at trail stop signs and (2) trail users failing to follow trail etiquette rules. The Public Safety Department has taken a proactive approach to both concerns by increasing patrol and through the issuance of violation tickets. The Park District has designed a "Share the Trail" educational campaign to inform and encourage trail users to respectfully and safely share the trail and exhibit good trail etiquette. On some trail segments, staff has responded and worked to immediately remove graffiti. Although the numbers of calls are minimal, Public Safety is positioned to respond to requests for medical assistance or trail accidents. Can the City include trail easement conditions to ensure timely trail implementation? Yes. The Park District has trailway agreements with several communities that include designated timeframes for financing, design, and implementation which go into effect upon receipt of trail easement to the Park District. Where can residents find out more information? More information is available at threeriversparks.org /news. aspx. ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT 0 ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Purpose of joint work session • Share information • Opportunity for open dialogue • Discuss outstanding questions • Review /approval process Joint work session overview • Project background • Routes for review and consideration • Next steps • Questions and discussion Project Background • First Tier Regional Trails, Greenways & Parks Master Plan (2000) • Related resolutions /studies /planning • Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail status First Tier Regional Trails, Greenways & Parks Master Plan (2000) M.mu qEG� �L•mRC�JE�^ -. NoPiorvs o . � R MI'�NEfOIMi //C EDEN PPNIi a.r��iTw •w AECJON41 CoNP4 0N/ L DETAILED CORRIDOR ANALYSIS EDtia!oiCs+FIE_D CDRAIDC#i 4.nF'4E1F.FJ P-f A$ A REMONAL RAIL R. LWR PMN _ a.r��iTw •w AECJON41 CoNP4 0N/ L DETAILED CORRIDOR ANALYSIS EDtia!oiCs+FIE_D CDRAIDC#i ... • r. ...... ....... City Council Resolution: October 2000 The City of Edina supports the efforts of the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District to implement a first tier system of trails, greenways and parks and endorses the development of a conceptual plan for said systems which conceptual plan will be subject to further approval of the City of Edina " --LU ... • r. ...... ....... City Council Resolution: October 2000 The City of Edina supports the efforts of the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District to implement a first tier system of trails, greenways and parks and endorses the development of a conceptual plan for said systems which conceptual plan will be subject to further approval of the City of Edina " City Council Resolution: December 2003 " The City of Edina supports the efforts of the Three Rivers Park District to implement the Richfield /Edina Trail Corridor " 2006 Needs Assessment Survey • Conducted by City of Edina Park and Recreation Department - Mailed to more than 3,000 Edina homes - —900 surveys were returned • Key findings of respondent households: - Walking and biking trails are the most important park and recreation facility - 'Exercise /fitness' and 'enjoying the outdoors /nature' are the most important reasons for using walking and biking trails in the City of Edina Q7. Percentage of Respondent Households That Have a Need for Various Parks and Recreation Facilities by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Walking and biking trails Natural areas and wildlife habitats 18 and 9 hole golf courses Playground equipment Art center Indoor fitness and exercise facilities Indoor running/walking track Outdoor tennis courts Indoor swimming pools Warming houses Indoor golf dome Indoor playground Outdoor spray pool parks Outdoor hockey rinks Soccer fields Off -leash dog park Indoor hockey and figure skating rink Indoor nature center Senior center Baseball fields Indoor sports facility Indoor basketball and volleyball court Football fields Softball fields Skateboard park Lacrosse fields � 49% 45% 40% 40% 3.7% 3:7% 36% 32 %? i 1 28% - 26% M26% 26% =23%24% - 21% -i20% - i19% _ ::19% 12% 12% 7% 66% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% St•nlLe Lri:lue %- i:ionETC Inc'tihlte iNovendbef - -. Q8. Parks and Recreation Facilities That Are Most Important to Respondent Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices Walking and biking trails Natural areas and wildlife habitats 18 and 9 hole golf courses Playground equipment Indoor fitness and exercise facilities Indoor playground Off -leash dog park Outdoor tennis courts Outdoor spray pool parks Soccer fields Indoor running/walking track Senior center Art center Indoor hockey and figure skating rink Outdoor hockey rinks Indoor swimming pools Indoor golf dome Baseball fields Indoor basketball and volleyball court Indoor sports facility Warming houses Indoor nature center Football fields Softball fields Lacrosse fields Skateboard park Other 86% 100% 164% 30% 27% 24 %' 17,% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% :9% 9% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Most Important 02nd Most Important 03rd Most Important 04th Most Important Soivae Letstue Vmion ETA7 LtALhite illoveintvf Q9. Reasons That Respondent Households Would Use Walking and Biking Trails in the City of Edina by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Excercise /fitness Enjoying outdoors /nature Transportation None, would not use trails 84% 84% 25% 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Soince Le iue t "t: tia� ET :' L, nnur tN. rtul r .006) Q19. What are Respondent Households Most Willing To Fund With Additional Tax Dollars by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top three choices Develop walking and biking trails 66 %, Develop a new indoor recreation center 42% Develop outdoor athletic fields for sports 21% Aggressively remove buckthorn from city parks 21% Dev. new indoor nature center at Bredesen Park E19% Develop new indoor sports facility for games. etc. 19% Develop a new outdoor dog exercise park 17% Develop new outdoor artificial hockey rink 13% Other 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 101st Most Willing 02nd Most Willing 03rd Most Willing Sotnce Lemitre %'Lion ET(--' hi -sitnte (November _- 2007 City Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and 2030 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail status • Regional status • City of Edina status 0.N °Nt Connect to Cedar Lake, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trails and North Cedar Regional Trail in rs t l i Three Rivers Park District Regional Trails Exisiing /Planned Regional Trail Aw^" Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Planning Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Under Construction N AD Miles Connect to Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Lake Nokomis j s Connect to Minnesota Wildlife Refuge at Bloomington Visitor Center 2010/2011 Construction Hopkins & Minnetonka: 7th Street South to Hwy 169; construction in conjunction with Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project e rThree Rivers Park District Regional Trails ExisitnglPlanned Regional Trail �.. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Planning Connect to Cedar Lake, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trails and North Cedar Regional Trail in Hopkins Nine Mlle Creek Regional Trail: Under Construction ARAN l\ 0 Mlles Connect to Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Lake 2010 --2012 Construction Connect to Minnesota Wildlife Refuge at Bloomington Visitor Center Richfield: Xerxes to 12th Avenue; under construction in conjunction with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services sewer work aT 0.a4p1'i ' Connect to Cedar Lake, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trails and North Cedar Regional Trail in Hopkins a 6R' ¢Lmb t� pd Three Rivers Park District Regional Trails - Exisltng'Planned Regional Trail Fark d - Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Planning L y Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Under Construction N t 0 Miles A Connect to Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Lake nOkom,s Connect to Minnesota Wildlife Refuge at Bloomington Visitor Center 2014 Planned Construction Minneapolis /Bloomington: Link to Lake Nokomis to Mall of America; $5.5 million of federal funding available in 2014 Three Rivers Park District Regional Trails EalsitngiPlanned Regional Trail vart Conned to Cedar Lake, p Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trails and Nnrth Cedar Regio in Hopk 4 J` Yana•'' - Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Planning L�,""W ♦ Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Under Construction N � Miles A Unresolved Gap Edina: Planning underway to determined preferred route Connect to Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Lake Nokomis t R Connect to Minnesota Wildlife Refuge at Bloomington Visitor Center t 3 1�aaLw_'ve, °,° :. T" t , r'4 -., ? � n a ° e: � � a,...,. a t g a ,. a � w " e, t � , _ : . ;41 t 0'. J 5F 1 so .•etL• c, iL � f= -,91 1 SE A �7 % Legend -- Altematme Trail Routes' 5E . Alternative Trail Route Number 19 ------- L 201, F-I --- r ------ F----I Wes 0 025 05 075 1 N - Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect Conceptual trail corridor and does not depict t 31 actual trail alignment. 1- GIs Data of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: City of Edina — r-7; acMno,alMges and atcea6 the hmrtanors of Alternative Trail Routes ThreeffiVel*S P--d to, T.- R,— I.rk D— PARK DIM- I v--q S.— - G 06 -2010 Project status in Edina • Community Assessment Team (CAT) le Voluntary environmental assessment * Public involvement opportunities • Public comment summary Community Assessment Team (CAT) • Composition • Role - Identify the constraints and opportunities - Provide design suggestions /considerations - Convey information to respective neighbors • CAT Analysis June 2010 Document - Social, technical, and economic assessment - Design suggestions - CAT member narrative on respective route Voluntary environmental assessment Evaluated potential impacts regarding: - Wildlife /ecologically sensitive resources - Wetlands /floodplain - Surface water runoff /erosion /sedimentation - Parking • Conclusion: - Potential environmental impacts are addressable in design, permitting, construction, and operation phases Public involvement opportunities • CAT • Bike Edina Task Force open house • 4 City of Edina open houses • 30 -day official public comment period 30 -day public comment summary • 175 unique emails or letters • 2 form letters (21 correspondences) - Form letter 1: creek based preference (15 letters) - Form letter 2: high school cross - country ski interests (6 letters) • 3 petitions - Petition 1: high school running interests (20 signatures) - Petition 2: issues specific to routes 2 and 3 (42 signatures) - Petition 3: general trail concerns (88 signatures) 30 -day public comment summary Support/ Opposition Unique & Route Preference Emails /Letters Form Letters Petition Support Trail 97 21 20 Prefer route adjacent to creek 77 21 20 No route preference indicated 19 0 0 Prefer route adjacent to roads 1 0 0 Oppose Trail 42 0 130 Cost of trail too high 30 0 130 Environmental concerns 29 0 130 Unsafe for non -trail users 18 0 130 Priority should not be recreation trails 14 0 0 Too noisy construction, trail users 4 0 130 Position about Trail Unclear 36 0 0 If built, prefer route adjacent to creek 14 0 0 If built, prefer route adjacent to roads 10 0 0 No route preference indicated 12 0 0 Routes for Review and Consideration • Routes for review Key considerations mr 1121 'IS& p 41. 5 1 SE 3 61 Legend 13 Creek-Based Route 4 - ...... Alternative Trail Routes* -w rSE Alternative Trail Route Number 12-2 0 r---L--j L ------ j I Miles a a 0 025 05 C75 1 N • 3 Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflect 17 Ccnceprua trail corridor and does not depict actual tra," alignment. 21!1 TI. en � 1-1 =Iltll I —d Creek-based option _ . 1 .. tta aa e n b, P., D'. Example: Dakota Rail Regional Trail Example: Elm Creek Park Reserve Trail k� Example: Typical Regional Trail Boardwalks: • What do boardwalks look like? • Where are they proposed? Example: Lake Independence Regional Trail 3 62 „T T. I T 1, �T Legend 13 Road Based Route g 18-4 Alternative Trail Routes' S is Altemative Trail Route Number 20 -2 Miles F --7 L__J ------- Miles I 0 0,25 0.5 0.75 1 N IT" I— 5T Alternative Trail Route is generalized to reflea 17 Conceptual trail corridor and does not depict actual trail alignment. 28, Tb.s GIs D.I. i. f �1 —C —d I— I the Road-based option of men runt t... d .,,d- 1,, Thee 1 pspnrad P=,., S.,, - OG 06 Mo Example: North Cedar Regional Trail r. a h rp a. a # r t ' Example: Medicine Lake Regional Trail Example: Bassett Creek Regional Trail Road -based route: • Is route on- street? • Is trail on private property? • What about r parking? Example: Luce Line Regional Trail Three Rivers Park District Regional Trails ryi u,netcnaa c d. i stPa* Exisitng/Planned Regional Trail n«` O.-Ar Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: Construclion 2010 -2012 N 1 A wax,.„ ria c OMiles '•a J` p c aa,vw rwsw a' y, 0401 A No route option Key CAT considerations • Social Assessment - Number of adjacent homes - Distance from home to trail • Technical Assessment - Driveway /road crossings - Available right -of- way /public land • Economic Assessment - Preliminary trail construction costs Connect to Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Lake Nokomis i I / Connect to Minnesota Wildlife Refuge at Bloomington , Visitor Center, Key CAT considerations adjacent residential yards Key CAT considerations proximity of adjacent homes Creek -based Route Road -based Route No Route Average 5 17 front yards • 34 front yards Number of a 16 side yards • 38 side yards N/A adjacent a 216 back yards 82 back yards residential yards • 243 total adjacent • 147 total adjacent N/A house to residential yards residential yards N/A Key CAT considerations proximity of adjacent homes Creek -based Route Road -based Route No Route Average distance from • 175' • 90' N/A house to trail Average distance from house to 3 60' 9 45' N/A property line Number of homes < 25' 3 homes • 8 homes N/A from trail Key CAT considerations space requirements (available road right -of -way) Key CAT considerations road crossings Creek -based Route Road -based Route No Route Proposed No street Route redesign/ reconstruction (remove 4 routes require road 8 routes require road N/A parking lane/ redesign /reconstruction redesign /reconstruction N/A reduce • 9 @ 30 MPH or less • shoulder road crossed • width) • 2 @ 31 -40 MPH N/A Key CAT considerations road crossings Creek -based Route Road -based Route No Route Number of road crossings 11 road crossings • 31 road crossings N/A Speed limits of • 9 @ 30 MPH or less • 29 @ 30 MPH or less road crossed • 2 @ 31 -40 MPH • 2 @ 31 -40 MPH N/A Average annual ' 4 @ <5,000 AADT • 23 @ <5,000 AADT daily traffic of 2 @ 5,000 to 6,999 AADT • 2 @ 5,000 to 6,999 AADT N/A road crossed 2 @ 7,000 to 9,000 AADT • 4 @ 7,000 to 9,000 AADT • 3 @ 9,001 to 47,000 AADT • 2 @ 9,001 to 47,000 AADT • 4 local roads • 23 local roads Functional 5 collector roads • 6 collector roads class of road 1 'B' minor arterial road • 1 'B' minor arterial road N/A crossed 1 'A' Minor arterial • 1 'A' Minor arterial (reliever) road (reliever) road Key CAT considerations driveway crossings Creek -based route: considerations • Pros: - Meets regional trail network needs /connects Edina to network - Opens public park land along creek to public use - Provides a high quality recreational trail experience - Off -road access to school complex • Cons: - Larger number of residences adjacent to trail - Perceived negative impacts of trail on adjacent residences - Limited access points to trail when along creek - Higher initial cost than road route Creek -based Route Road -based Route No Route • 7 single family driveway • 24 single family driveway crossings crossings • 18 multi - family driveway • 23 multi - family driveway crossings crossings • 4 low turnover commercial • 9 low turnover commercial N/A Number of driveway crossings driveway crossings driveway . 2 high turnover • 4 high turnover crossings commercial driveway commercial driveway crossings crossings • 31 driveway crossings • 60 driveway crossings N/A Creek -based route: considerations • Pros: - Meets regional trail network needs /connects Edina to network - Opens public park land along creek to public use - Provides a high quality recreational trail experience - Off -road access to school complex • Cons: - Larger number of residences adjacent to trail - Perceived negative impacts of trail on adjacent residences - Limited access points to trail when along creek - Higher initial cost than road route Road -based route: considerations • Pros: - Meets regional trail network needs /connects Edina to network - Lower cost than Creek route - Fewer residences adjacent to trail - More frequent access points • Cons: - Less safe for trail users due to more road and driveway crossings - Less attractive trail setting and experience - Some instances where trail will be very close to adjacent residences - Less direct route No route: considerations • Three Rivers funding will be directed to other Park District projects • Edina will not be connected to the regional trail network • Access to the Edina High School complex north of Hwy 62 will continue to be on sidewalks along Gleason and Tracy Cost Financing - capital costs • Federal transportation funds • Park District General Obligation Bonds • Metropolitan Council Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program funding • Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails Legacy grant program funds • Other: donations, non - profit grants, small scale opportunities • Cost savings from partnerships Creek -based route Road -based route No route Capital costs for $20 million $17 million $0 Edina segment Operations and $1851000/ $1851000/ $0 maintenance annually annually (O /M) costs for entire regional trail Financing - capital costs • Federal transportation funds • Park District General Obligation Bonds • Metropolitan Council Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program funding • Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails Legacy grant program funds • Other: donations, non - profit grants, small scale opportunities • Cost savings from partnerships Financing - capital costs partnership ~� opportunities • Creek -based sections • Road -based sections • Pentagon redevelopment area • Park sections Financing - operations and maintenance (O /M) costs • General operating fund - Property tax revenue - State 0/M funds through the Metropolitan Council Next Steps • Approval process io Implementation steps Approval process • Edina Park Board • Edina City Council • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District • School District • Three Rivers Park District Implementation steps • Master plan completion • Cooperative trailway agreement • Trail easement • Grant applications • Construction Discussion Edina City Council and Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners More project information is available at: http:// www .threeriversparks.org /news.aspx (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MN 55424 Notice of Public Hearing Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail On December 7, 2010, the Edina City Council will conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Edina Park Board's recommendation to approve the development of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 501h Street. The public is welcome to attend and each person will be permitted up to three minutes to share their views. At their Tuesday, October 12, 2010 monthly meeting, the Edina Park Board voted to approve a recommendation to develop the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. The Park Board's recommendation suggests that the City Council give Three Rivers Park District easements (with some restrictions and conditions) to City -owned park land to develop a multi -modal trail primarily along Nine Mile Creek. More detailed information is available on the City's website which also provides a link to the Three Rivers Park District website. Written comments may be submitted to the City Council by sending an email to edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us or letters to Edina City Council; Edina City Hall; 4801 West 501h St.; Edina, MN 55424 For more information, contact Park & Recreation Director John Keprios, 952- 826 -0430 or JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT ON THURSDAYS, NOVEMBER 4, 11, 18, 25, AND DECEMBER 2, 2010 BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION City of Edina Public Notices PUBLIC NOTICE Notice. of Public Hearing Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail On Dec..7, 2010, the Edina City Council,will conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Edina` Park Board's recommendation to approve the "development, of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail The City Council meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street. The public Is welcome to attend'and'each person will be permitted up to three minutes to share their views. At their Tuesday, Oct. 12, .2010 monthly meeting, the Edina Park Board voted to approve a recommendation to. develop the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. The Park Board's.recommendation suggests that the City Council give Three Rivers Park District easements (with some restrictions and conditions) to City-owned parkaand to develop a multi- modal.trai,l primarily along Nine Mile Creek. More detailed information is availabie,on the City's website which also provides a link to the Three Rivers Park District website. Written comments may be submitted to the City Council by sending an email to edinamaiKDci.edina.mn.us or letters to: Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 For more information, contact Park & Recreation Director John Keprios, 952- 826 -0430 or edinamail(aci.edina.mn.us. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Debra Mangen City Clerk Published Nov. 4, 2010 h.ttp:// www. cityofedina. com/ PressReleases /L5- 08_PublicNotice 1 5.htm Page 1 of l 11/22/2010 /1�1r� ow e • I�roRPORP�EO/ lees REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.C. From: Debra Margen City Clerk Action Discussion ❑ Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Public Hearing: 2011 Liquor License Fees ACTION REQUESTED: Hold public hearing. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND:_ Minnesota Statute requires the City Council to hold a public hearing after a thirty day notice to license holders of its intention to raise any of its liquor license fees. I have attached a copy of the notice that was mailed to our licensees November 4, 2010, showing the proposed 2011 liquor license fees. I would point out that the Club, Wine and Sunday license fees are at the limit allowed under statute. Staff believes the On -Sale Intoxicating license fee adequately covers the cost of administration and enforcement. However, staff feels that the beer license fees should continue an incremental increase to keep pace with the City's increased costs for administration and enforcement. Staff is not requesting any action on this item from the Council other than to hold the hearing. When the annual fees and charges ordinance is adopted the fees will be included in the ordinance. ATTACHMENT: 2011 Notice of Liquor License Fees NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER INCREASING THE FEE FOR LIQUOR LICENSES The Edina City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, at -7:00 P.M. to consider increasing the fees for on -sale and off -sale 3.2. beer ,licenses, and temporary on -sale 3.2 beer licenses effective January 1, 2011, as follows: Club On -Sale Liquor License On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor On -Sale Wine On -Sale 3.2 Beer Off -Sale 3.2 Beer Sunday On -Sale License 2010 Fee $300 Under 200 members $500 201 -500 members $650 501 -1000 members $800 1001 -2000 members $1000 2001 -4000 members $2000 4001 -6000 members $3000 Over 6000 members $8755.00 $2000.00 $645.00 $645.00 $ 200.00 Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Beer License $87.00 /event Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating $200.00 /event All persons who desire to be heard on this issue can either: Pr000sed 2011 Fee $300 Under 200 members $500 201 -500 members $650 501 -1000 members $800 1001 -2000 members $1000 2001 -4000 members $2000 4001 -6000 members $3000 Over 6000 members $8755.00 $ 2000.00 $655.00 $ 655.00 $ 200.00 $90.00 /event $200.00 /event 1. Submit a letter to the Edina City Council, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, before the date of the hearing. 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony. This notice is given in compliance with Minnesota Statute 340A.408, Subd. 3A. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Ow y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE �O 0 (Amended 12/7/2010) aaa TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Scott Neal, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 DATE: December 7, 2010 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: `2011 ne Ton F450 Ford Truck — Park Maintenance Department DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Midway Ford Fleet Sales 1. $35,175.38 MN State Contract #443069 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: ACCOUNT #: Midway Ford Fleet Sales $35,175.38 (plus sales tax) 1650.6710 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase and delivery of a 2011 one ton 4X4 cab and chassis model F450 Ford Truck for the Park Maintenance Department. This heavy duty truck has 6.7 liter diesel engine and is being purchased under the Minnesota State Contract #443069. This vehicle replaces a similar one ton truck (#47.379) which is a 2001 Dodge 4X4 that has already been sent to public auction. The price of $35,175.38 does not include sales tax. This purchase is funded under the 2010 Equipment Replacement Budget. This is an amended Purchase Order Request. The original mistakenly listed the new truck as a 2010 year model; whereas, it is in fact a 2011 year model. John Ke -i s, Director This Reconunended bid is j within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. B. From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Fire Department Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Fire Engine - Pumper Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid General Safety Fire Apparatus(Rosenbauer) 1. $392,003.00 Clarey's Safety (Pierce) 2. $400,000.00 Fire Safety USA (E -One) 3. $435,000.00 Custom Fire z 4. $399,594.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: General Safety Fire Apparatus $ $ 392,003.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase request is for a Fire Engine /Pumper with a 1500 GPM pump. It would replace a 1986 Fire Engine /Pumper with a 1500 GPM pump, which would go to auction. The lowest bid is from General Safety for a Rosenbauer Engine- Pumper, which is manufactured in Wyoming, MN. The existing 1986 fire engine has become unreliable to use as an emergency response vehicle and too costly to maintain. This purchase is through the HGAC Purchasing Cooperative and will be funded through the Fire Department Equipment Replacement CIP Account as a 2011 expenditure. The bid is below the budgeted amount ($430,000) and we would anticipate taking delivery of the vehicle in the fall of 2011. The Bid from Custom Fire, who was the low bidder on our last fire engine purchase, is not through the Cooperative, but we wanted to be sure we were getting the best competitive bid. The expected life of this vehicle would be 20 -25 years. I have studied surveys of fire department vehicle purchases and the average fire engine cost is approximately $425,000. Fire G Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget_,-" Joha-,W IlidQ Finance Ma REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN _EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. C. From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Fire Department Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Fire Department Support Vehicles (SUV) x 3 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid Polar Chevrolet $ 102, 718.50 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Polar Chevrolet $ 102,718.50 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase request is for (3) Chevrolet Tahoe 4x4 Sport Utility Vehicles(SUV) used as support & inspections vehicles for the fire department. They would replace a 1999 Dodge Durango, a 2000 GMC Safari and a 2000 Dodge Dakota, all of which would go to public sale auction. The fire department purchased 2 Tahoes in 2007 and they have proven to be reliable, meet our space needs and are the most fuel efficient vehicles in their class. These vehicles are also E85 compatible. These vehicles are specially equipped for emergency response including 2 batteries and improved suspension. The existing vehicles have less than desired reliability to use as an emergency response vehicles and are excessively costly to maintain. This purchase would be through the State of Minnesota Purchasing Program and would be funded through the Fire Department Equipment Replacement CIP Account. The bid is within budgeted amount and we would anticipate taking delivery of the vehicles in early 2011. The expected life of these vehicles would be 10 years.. / Fire Signature Department The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within b Wallin, Fin Scott Neai Manager Director ,r� 0w e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Action Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -118 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. The City has received a grant from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to aid in placement of GSP units on snow plows to aid in monitoring salt use as outlined in Jesse Struve's attached memorandum. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -118 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -118 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities. to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Police Department: Alerus Financial $100.00 Edina Braemar Golf Course: John King $500.00 Edina Women's Golf Association $100.00 Braemar Men's Club $50.00 Dated: December 7, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Richad Cramer John Hale $25.00 $100.00 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , -- City Clerk City Hall - _ - . 952 -927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 oe .f \�CORPPn; W REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. B. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to the City Manager ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -117 REGARDING FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The purpose of this resolution is to allow for a restatement of the City of Edina's Flexible Benefit Plan which is a plan that offers participating employees a way to use pre -tax dollars to pay for non - covered health care and dependent care expenses. The restatement of this Plan will bring it into compliance with the new HIPAA Regulations and President Obama's Health Care Reform Act. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -117 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -117 AMENDING THE CITY OF EDINA FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina previously adopted the Flexible Benefit Plan on January 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to amend and restate such Plan to include the following: • The Plan desires to amend and restate the Plan to incorporate all previous Summary of Material Modifications and to comply with the most recent and relevant regulatory changes since the last amendment and restatement of the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina Flexible Benefit Plan be and the same is amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2011; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any proper members of the City are hereby authorized to make such contributions from the funds of the City as are necessary to carry out the provisions of said plan at any time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the event any conflict arises between the provisions of said Plan or any other applicable law or regulation (as such law or regulation may be interpreted or amended), the City shall resolve such conflict in a manner which complies with such law or regulation. Dated: December 7, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 120 City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 o Le� \�cbxroB �s8° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. C. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to the City Manager ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -118 REGARDING HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENT ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The purpose of this resolution is to allow for a restatement of the City of Edina's Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) which is one of the City's health plans made available to its employees. The restatement of this Plan will bring it into compliance with the new HIPAA Regulations and President Obama's Health Care. Reform Act. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -118 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -118 AMENDING THE CITY OF EDINA HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENT City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina previously adopted the Health Reimbursement Arrangement on January 1, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to amend and restate such Plan to include the following: The Plan desires to amend and restate the Plan to incorporate all previous Summary of Material Modifications and to comply with the most recent and relevant regulatory changes since the last amendment and restatement of the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina Health Reimbursement Arrangement be and the same is amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2011; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any proper members of the City are hereby authorized to make such contributions from the funds of the City as are necessary to carry out the provisions of said plan at any time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the event any conflict arises between the provisions of said Plan or any other applicable law or regulation (as such law or regulation may be interpreted or amended), the City shall resolve such conflict in a manner which complies with such law or regulation. Dated: December 7, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of ,20 City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 0379 A, o e Cn \�COIR88a REPORURECOM MEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.D.E.F. From: John Wallin ® Action Finance Director Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Resolutions Setting Year 2011 Fees and Charges ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss the proposed fees and charges to be adopted by resolution. Approve resolutions 2010 -119, 2010 -120, and 2010 -121. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by resolution proposed for 2011. The fees that are proposed to change from 2010 to 2011 are in bold. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution No. 2010 -119 Setting 2011 Park and Recreation Fees. Park fees other than Art Center fees were approved by the Park Board. Art Center fees were approved by the Art Center Board. 2) Resolution No. 2010 -120 Setting Ambulance Fees for 2011. 3) Resolution No. 2010 -121 Setting Miscellaneous Fees for 2011. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -119 SETTING 2011 PARK AND RECREATION FEES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 2011 Park and Recreation Fees. PARK AND RECREATION 2010 2011 Playground $35.00 $35.00 Adult Tennis Instruction $50.00 $50.00 Youth Tennis Instruction $50.00 $50.00 Pee Wee Tennis $36.00 $36.00 Team Tennis $92.00 $100.00 Tennis Cam $99.00 $99.00 Fab 4 & 5 $77.00 $77.00 Small Wonders $67.00 $67.00 Safety Cam $32.00 $32.00 Super 6 & 7 $50.00 $50.00 Cheerleading Cam $50.00 $50.00 Fishina Clinic $10.00 $10.00 Highlands Ex lorers $57.00 $57.00 Challengers $92.00 $92.00 Travelin' Teens $92.00 $92.00 Sweetheart Dance $47.00 /Couple NA Family Open Gym $3.00 NA Winter Break Camp $47.00 NA Playground Plus $17.00 $17.00 Barnyard Boogie $4.00/ per person $4.00/ per person Sk hawks (Mini Hawks ) $101.00 $101.00 Soccer Camp Sk hawks $49.00 $49.00 Basketball Camp Sk hawks $105.00 $105.00 Gin Weidenfeller Classes $35.00 $35.00 Reach Education Solutions Pre - School Programs NA $75.00 Pre - School Week Workshops /Camps NA $35.00 Age 7 -11 Camps NA $65.00 Hip Hop Classes NA $46.00 Family Classes NA $40.00/ air Once Upon a Star Parties Cinderella's Princess Ball NA $26.00/couple Grandma & Me Day NA $19.00/couple Mom & Me Spa Day NA $25.00/couple Springtime Tea Parry NA $19.00 /cou le ADULT ATHLETIC FEES SUMMER SOFTBALL LEAGUES BASKETBALL Season Tickets 2010 2011 2010 2011 Men's Resident Team $425.00 $425.00 5 -Man C League $500.00 $500.00 Men's Non - Resident Team $585.00 $585.00 5 -Man B League $500.00 $500.00 Co-ReC Resident Team $460.00 $460.00 HOCKEY Co -ReC Non - Resident Team $620.00 $620.00 4 -Man League $250.00 $250.00 Men's Double Header Resident Team $665.00 $665.00 BROOMBALL Men's Double Header Non - Resident Team $825.00 $825.00 Co -Rec League $300.00 $300.00 Non - Resident Individual (up to 4 players) $26.00 $26.00 CO -REC KICKBALL VOLLEYBALL: Co -Rec Kickball $125.00 $125.00 Officiated Leagues $345.00 $345.00 Non- Resident'(Individual) $10.00 $10.00 AQUATIC CENTER 2010 2011 Season Tickets Resident Family: First 2 members *$85.00/$95.00 *$85.00/$95.00 Each additional member $45.00 $45.00 Maximum 8 members $365.00 $365.00 Resident Individual *45.00/$50.00 *45.00/$50.00 Non - Resident Family: First 2 members *$100.00/$110.00 *$100.00/$110.00 Each addition al member $5.0.00 $50.00 Maximum 8 members $410.00 $410.00 Non - Resident Individual $55.00/$60.00 $55.00/$60.00 Daily Admissions - Dail Admission resident & non - resident $10.00 $10.00 Admission after 6 om $8.00 $8.00 Aquatic Instruction Aquatic Instruction I Contracted Contracted • Early Bird Special if purchased no later than April 30, 2011. • Prices DO NOT include tax. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 2010 2011 18 hole - non-patron 18 hole - patron 9 hole - non-patron 9 hole - patron Masters Senior Patrons age 75 College Age Rate Junior 18 Hole Rate Junior 9 Hole Rate GROUP FEES - 18 holes GROUP FEES - 9 holes P Individual Non - Resident Parton Card P Individual Resident Non - Resident Men's 72 inch Men's 42 inch Ladies 72 inch Club Storage Club Rental Pull Carts Push Carts - 9 Hole Push'Carts -18 Hole 18 holes 9 holes 18 holes /person with disabilit /sl Group Car Fees Adult Junior Resident - wedding related Non - residents - wedding related Other events Large Bucket Small Bucket Warm-Up Bucket Green Fees and over $37.00 $29.00 $19.00 $15.00 $24.00 $25.00 $18.00 $10.00 $46.00 $22.00 atron Cards (Before April 1 Pa Cards Computers; Lockers $70.00 $110.00 March 31 $75.00 ndicaps $23.00 $28.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $50.00 1 $5.00 Golf Cars $30.00 $18.00 1 rider $16.00 $36.00 Group Golf Lessons $99.00 $46.00 Braemar Room $900.00 $1,000.00 $350.00/$1,000.00 Braemar Driving Range $7.50 $5.00 $3.00 3 $37.00 $29.00 $19.00 $15.00 $24.00 $25.00 $18.00 $10.00 $46.00 $22.00 $70.00 $75.00 $23.00 $28.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $50.00 $8.50 $30.00 $18.00 $16.00 $36.00 $99.00 $46.00 $900.00 $1,000.00 $350.00/$1,000.00 $7.50 $5.00 $3.00 BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE AND FRED RICHARDS COURSE GREENS FEES 2010 2011 Adult non-patron $14.00 $14.00 Adult patron $11.00 $11.00 Junior $9.50 $9.00 Junior —10 Round Card $70.00 $70.00 Golf Cars (everyone) $14.00 $14.00 Pull Carts $2.50 $2.50 Group Fees $16900 $16.00 BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE AND FRED RICHARDS COURSE PATRON CARDS Adults Only 18 and older $25.00 $25.00 GOLF DOME Large Bucket $7.50 $7.50 Senior Bucket $7.00 $7.00 Time Golf ' /z hour $10.50 $10.50 Hourly Field Rental $130.00 $130.00 4 EDINBOROUGH PARK 2010 2011 `Pool & Track "Dail `Passes Pool & Track Daily Passes $6.00 residents &T non- residents $6.00 residents & non - residents "Pool &.Track" Season Passes. _ Edina Individual $260.00 $260.00 Each Additional Member $90.00 $90.00 Non -Edina Individual $290.00 $290.00 Each Additional Member $100.00 $100.00 Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 Birthda Party Packa es /2 Hours Adventure Package $125.00 $130.00 Peak Package $75_.00 $80.00 :BUILDING RENTALS:', Exclusive Rental Non= Exclusive Rentals /Hr $110.00 2010 2011 $90.00 2010 2011 Friday Evening NA NA Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 Saturday Evening NA NA Theater $250.00 $250.00 Prom NA NA Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Adventure Peak $300.00 $300.00 Pool (swim team od $30.00 $30.00 Commercial:Photo Shoot Hourf Domestic Photo Shoot' Hou Any Park Area Blocked Off $250.00 $250.00 Any Park Area Blocked Off $200.00 $200.00 Grotto $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Theatre $250.00 $250.00 Theatre $200.00 $200.00 Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 Great Hall $350.00 1 $350.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK "PLAYPARK" 2010 T 2011 PlaypArk0guyAdmissibn . Resident $6.00 $6.00 Non - resident $6.00 $6.00 Children Under 12 Months FREE FREE Adults Free w/ paid child Free w/ paid child Edinborou h Association Members.-Daily Pass $6.00 $6.00. Pla ark Punch Pass = 10 ,Uses Resident $50.00 $50.00 Non - resident $50.00 $50.00 Resident Season Pass First Member $85.00 $85.00 Each Additional Member $65.00 $65.00 Non- Resident Season Pass, First Member $110.00 $110.00 Each Additional Member $90.00 $90.00 Total Facili Maily Admission Resident $10.00 $10.00 Non - resident $10.00 $10.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES 2010 2011 Hourly Rate (as of 9/11) 2010 2011 Rental Concession Items Weekend Rental - 6:00 pm - Midni ht Paddle Boats $2.00 $2.00 Friday evening $995.00 $995.00 4 person boat'/ hr $7.00 $8.00 Saturday evening $995.00 $995.00 Winter sled per hr $7.00 $7.00 $10.00 Maximum 7 persons) $160.00 Ice Skate $5.00 $5_.00 $100.00 Non - Resident Family: Building Rentals Champ! n Puffin 1/2 da - Salon M -TH $225.00 $225.00 9 hole $5.00 $5.00 Sunday- '/2 day Salon $350.00 $350.00 18 hole $8.00 $8.00 Amphitheater Rental Lawn Games Amphitheater Rental $250.00 $250.00 Per Court $15.00 /hr $16.00 1hr Commercial Photo Shoot $50.00 /hr $50.00 /hr ARENA 2010 2011 Hourly Rate (as of 9/11) $185.00 $190.00 Open skating Youth and Adult $4.00 $4.00 Skate Rental $2.00 $2.00 Skate Sharpening $4.00 $4.00 Season Tickets set first week of September) Resident Family: First 2 members $110.00 $110.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum 7 persons) $160.00 $160.00 Resident Individual $100.00 $100.00 Non - Resident Family: First 2 members $125.00 $125.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum 7 persons) $175.00 $175.00 Non - Resident Individual $110.00 $110.00 Classes Classes 1 $118.00 $118.00 ART CENTER Hours 2009 Hours @$7.50 hour NM /M 2010 Hours @7.75 hour NM /M 2011 Hours to $8.00 hour NM /M $12 an Hour Workshop Workshop Price (parent/child) special Family Rate $5 an hour 30 $225/$202 $233/$210 $2401$216 $360/$324 $150/$135 24 $180/$162 $186/$167 $192/$173 $288/$259 $120/$108 22 $165/$148 $171/$164 $176/$158 $2641$238 $110/$99 20 $150/$135 $155/$140 $160/$144 $240/$216 $100/$90 18 $135/$121 $140/$126 $144/$130 $216/$194 $90/$81 16 $120/$108 $124/$112 $128/$115 $192/$173 $80/$72 15 $113/$102 $116/$105 $120/$108 $180/$162 $75/$67 14 $105/$94 $109/$98 $112/$101 $168/$151 $70/$63 12 $90/$81 $93/$84 $96/$86 $144/$130 $60/$54 10 $75/$67 $78/$70 $801$72 $120/$108 $50/$45 9 $68/$61 $70/$63 $72/$65 $108/$97 $45/$40 8 $60/$54 $62/$56 $641$58 $96/$86 $40/$36 7 $53/$48 $54/$49 $56/$50 $84/$76 $35$31 6 $45/$40 $47$42 $48/$43 $72/$65 $30/$27 NM /M - Non - Member /Member EDINA ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS 2010 2011 Annual Family Membership Resident members $5 0 $45.00 $45.00 Annual Individual Membershi Resident members 15_0 $30.00 $30.00 PEGGY KELLY MEDIA ARTS STUDIOS DO -IT YOURSELF 2010 2011 EQUIPMENT 2010 2011 SERVICES HOURLY HOURLY RENTAL 2 DAY 2 DAY FEE FEE RENTAL RENTAL Transfer movies to video 35mm Slide $25.00 $25.00 VHS tape or DVD disk $25.00/ $25.00/ Projector Studio does it $45.00 $45.00 Scan pictures or slides to Hi8mm Camcorder $25.00 $25.00 video (CD or DVD album) $15.00/ $15.00/ Studio does it $40.00 $40.00 Audio Dubbing or Transfer $15.00/ $15.00/ MiniDV Camcorder $50.00 $50.00 Studio does it $40.00 $40.00 Digital Video Editing $30.00/ $30.00/ Overhead Projector $20.00 $20.00 Studio does it $50.00 $50.00 Duplicate Copy of DVD $8.00 $8.00 16mm Movie $25.00 $25.00 Projector Foreign Conversion Super 8mm $25.00 $25.00 (PAL,SECAM) $20.00 $20.00 Projector with sound Studio Does it $26.00 $26.00 Audio cassette Dupl. $1.50/ $1.50/ 8mm Movie $25.00 $25.00 copy copy Projector Movie Screen $5.00 $5.00 Customer provides blank cassettes (video and audio), film. and lamination supplies except as noted. " STUDIO COPYINGITRANSFERRING PHOTONIDEO STUDIO RENTAL Fees 2010 2011 Photo Studio - not staffed $25.00 member non- members pay $15 add'I daily access fee $25.00 member non - members pay $15 add'I daily access fee COMPUTER OPEN STUDIO TIME $10.00 2010 2011 PC Computers (includes use of Photoshop, Photoshop Elements, Roxio video Editing software) $20 /hr. non - members pay $15 add'I daily accessfee I $20.00 /hr. non - members pay $15 add'I daily access fee MEMBERSHIP $1.50 Trips & Tours 2010 2011 One da /one visit pass $15.00 $15.00 Annual Individual. Membership 12 months $30.00 $30.00 Annual Family Membership 12 months $40.00 1 $45.00 EDINA SENIOR CENTER 2010 2011 Fees Golf League Membership (Richards Golf Course) $10.00. $12.00 55+ Softball League Membership Van Valkenbur $35.00 $35.00 Bowling League Membership $10.00 $10.00 Edina Senior Center Membership $17.00/$27.00 $17.00/$27.00 Greeting Cards $1.50 $1.50 Trips & Tours $2.50 $2.50 Defensive Driving $22.00 4 hr. class NA $22.00 4 hr. class NA Elder Learning Institute Classes $18.00 $18.00 Card Tournaments $1.00/ person $1.00/ person Social Card Groups $.25 per person per day $.25 per person per day Podiatrist $2.00 /Patient $2.00 /Patient Community Education $2.00 /person per class per day $2.00 /person per class per day Room Rental Fireside Room & Classrooms per hour - minimum 2 hours $42.90 $42.90 Fireside Room & Classrooms per day $150.20 $150.20 Gatherin /GRANDVIEW Room per hour - minimum 2 hrs. $53.60 $53.60 Gatherin /GRANDVIEW Room per day $203.80 $203.80 Wall Art Display Rental 15% of sale 15% of sale Equipment Rental TelevisionNCR/DVD $10.70 $10.70 Overhead Projector $5.40 $5.40 Portable Screen $5.40 $5.40 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS 2010 2011 2010 2011 General Park Areas Athletic Fields - Residents Onl Resident Use /hour $48.00 $48.00 Per field - per day $137.00 $137.00 Resident Use/day $137.00 $137.00 Per field - per hour $48.00 $48.00 Commercial Use (i.e. 11) /hr $75.00 $75.00 Per field - per hour w /li hts $75.00 $75.00 Commercial use with li ht/hr $130.00 $130.00 Showmobile /day $700.00 $700.00 Edina Athletic Associations Field user fee/participant $9.00 $9.00 Van Valkenburg /Courtney Fields Residents Only) Gymnasium user fee /participant $9.00 $9.00 Per field /day includes building $160.00 $160.00 Outdoor hockey rink user fee/participant $9.00 $9.00 Rosland Park Pathway Utley Park Fire Ring Rental Per Hour $55.00 $55.00 Fire Ring - per day $26.00 1 $26.00 Per Da $210.00 $210.00 Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Non - Residents Per hour, first hour $65.00 $65.00 Per hour, first hour $78.00 $78.00 Each additional hour up to 3 hours $40.00 $40.00 Each additional hour up to 3 hours $48.00 $48.00 Per day (4 hours or more) $185.00 $185.00 Per day (4 hours or more $222.00 $222.00 Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only Non - Residents '/ da 6 hrs or less $65.00 $65.00 '/2 da 6 hrs or less $78.00 $78.00 Full day over 6 hours $100.00 $100.00 Full day over 6 hours $120.00 $120.00 Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Non - Residents Per day 4 hours or more $200.00 $200.00 Per day 4 hours or more $240.00 $240.00 Per hour, first hour $100.00 $100.00 Per hour, first hour $120.00 $120.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $40.00 $40.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hours $48.00 $48.00 Picnic Shelter Rentals full da Picnic Shelter Rentals (hal a Chowen Park $42.00 $42.00 Chowen Park $26.00 $26.00 Sherwood Park $42.00 $42.00 Sherwood Park $26.00 $26.00 Wooddale Park $42.00 $42.00 Wooddale Park $26.00 $26.00 Rosland Park $150.00 $150.00 Braemar Park $42.00 1 $42.00 Park Shelter Buildin s. Rentals full day) Park Shelter Buildings Rentals half -day) Cornelia School Park $100.00 $100.00 Cornelia School Park $65.00 $65.00 Todd Park $100.00 $100.00 Todd Park $65.00 $65.00 Walnut Ridge Park $100.00 $100.00 Walnut Ridge Park $65.00 $65.00 Weber Park $100.00 $100.00 Weber Park 1 $65.00 $65.00 Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Dated this 7th day of December, James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 10 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -120 SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 2011 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service fees for 2011. AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation to a medical facilitv: 2010 2011 Level 1 - ON SCENE TREATMENT Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved ALS TREATMENT — NO TRANSPORT $350.00 $355.00 Admin. Of One or more medications with no transport Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) BASIC LIFE SUPPORT Vital Signs, Splinting, Bandaging $785.00 $790.00 Level 3 - MODERATE CARE ALS -1 ALS Assessment, 02, IV, Nitroglycerin Translingual Spray, ASA, Nitrous Oxide, 3 -12 Lead EKG Monitoring, Spine Immobilization, Ultrasound, Glucose Monitoring, CO Monitoring, 02 Monitoring $1,300.00 $1,310.00 Level 4 - MAJOR CARE ALS -2 ALS Assessment and any of the following: 3 or more Medications Cardiac Pacing Cardioversion Defibrillation Intraosseous Infusions Surgical Airway Management Chest Decompression Endotracheal I ntubation Central Venous Line, End -Tidal CO2 Monitoring PCT (inflated) Cardio /Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) $1,550.00 $1,565.00 RESPONSE TO SCENE AND NO TREATMENT OR TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED No Charge No Charge OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION Included in above Included in above MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $20.00 /mile $20.00 /mile ADDITIONAL STAFFING OR $575.00 /hour $580.00 MECHANICAL EXTRICATION 1 hour minimum 1 hour minimum VEHICLE DECONTAMINATION N/A $800.00 Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 7th day of December, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -121 SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 2011 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the followina miscellaneous fees for 2011: SPECIALIZED RESPONSE 2010 2011 Engine /Fire Company* $445.00 $450.00 Ladder Company* $600.00 $600.00 HazMat Unit* $670.00 $675.00 Special Operations Team* $840.00 $850.00 Limited Response* $225.00 $230.00 Gas Line Rupture Response* $400.00 $400.00 Specialized Equipment* Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Supplies Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Disposal Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Ambulance Standby* $200.00 $205.00 * Charges are per hour — one hour minimum Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. of December, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Dated this 7th day Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk 1 +, ;0 , ak /le con .f REPORURECOMMEN DATION To:. MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.G. From: John Wallin ® Action Finance Director F] Discussion 0 Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: First Reading Ordinance No 2010 -20 Amending Code Section 185 Schedule A - Increasing Certain Fees ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss the proposed fees and charges to be adopted by Ordinance. Approve first reading of Ordinance 2010 -20 Amending Code Section 185 Schedule A — Increasing Certain Fees. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance proposed for 2011. The fees that are proposed to change from 2010 to 2011 are in bold. ATTACHMENT: 1) Schedule of General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 — Schedule A. 2) Schedule of General Fund revenues as they appear in the budget. 3) Ordinance No. 2010 -20 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees. City of Edina Prop SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 195 195.03 Registration of Domestic Partners 25.00 25.00 Clerk _ Certified Copies of Registration 10.00 10.00 Clerk Amendments to Domestic Partners or 10.00 10.00 Clerk Notice of Termination of Domestic Partners 200 200.04 Public Dance Permit 54.00 54.00 Clerk 4137 215 215.04 Bingo Occasion, Gambling Device, 15.00 15.00 per permit Clerk 4313 Raffle Permit 220 220.04 Machine or Amusement Device License 15.00 15.00 annually per establishment, plus Health 4176 15.00 15.00 per machine Health 4176 225 225.04 Special Events Application Fee 53.50 60.00 Clerk 4125 300 300.02 Subd 2 Redemption of Impounded Animals 30.00 30.00 per day for feeding & care, any veterinarian services and impounding Police 4331 fee of: 40.00 40.00 a) If animal has not been impounded within one year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 65.00 65.00 b) If animal has been impounded once within the year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 115.00 115.00 c) If animal has been impounded twice or more within one year prior Police 4331 to the date of impounding 300 300.02 Subd 3 Disposal of Animal 40.00 40.00 per animal Police 4331 300 300.03 Subd. 3 Dog License 15.00 15.00 per dog Police 4120 10.00 10.00 per neutered dog Late charge after March 1 10.00 10.00 Police 4120 300 300.03 Subd. 4 Duplicate Dog License Tag 6.00 6.00 per duplicate tag Police 4120 300 300.04 Subd. 2 Commercial Kennel License 55.00 55.00 per year Police 4174 300 300.15 Permit for Extra Dogs or Cats 100.00 100.00 Police 4120 300 300.17 Subd.6A Dangerous Dog 100.00 100.00 Registration fee Police 4120 405 405.01 Landscaping, Screening, or Erosion 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 Control Site Plan Permit 410 410.02 Subd. 1 Building Permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $ 1 to 500 23.50 23.50 * Building 4111 501 to 2,000 23.50 23.50 * for first $500 plus Building 4111 3.05 3.05 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 Building 4111 2,001 to 25,000 69.25 69.25 * for first $2,000 plus Building 4111 14.00 14.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 Building 4111 25,001 to 50,000 391.25 391.25 * for first $25,000 plus Building 4111 10.10 10.10 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 Building 4111 50,001 to 100,000 643.75 643.75 * for first $50,000 plus Building 4111 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 Building 4111 100,001 to 500,000 993.75 993.75 * for first $100,000 plus Building 4111 5.60 5.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 Building 4111 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,233.75 3,233.75 * for the first $500,000 plus Building 4111 4.75 4.75 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including Building 4111 $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 5,608.75 5,608.75 * for the first $1,000,000 plus Building 4111 3.65 3.65 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Building 4111 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4380 H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2010 11:52 AM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUE 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20' 52 AM Plan Review 65% 65% of Permit Fee Building 4111 410 410.02 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 410 410.02 Subd. 3 Residential Building Contractor, 5.00 5.00 surcharge pursuant to M.S. 326.86 Building 4380 Remodeler or Specialty Contractor License Verification 415 415.02 Permit for Moving of Building 212.00 212.00 Building 4111 415 415.02 Subd. 3 Indemnity Deposit for Damages 530.00 530.00 unless licensed by Commissioner of Transportation . Building 2605 Sustained by Moving of Building 421 421.03 R -O -W Work Annual Registration 200.00 200.00 Engineer 4341 421 421.04 R -O -W Excavation Permit Administrative 75.00 75.00 Engineer 4341 Fee Per Additional Excavation -Paved Area 35.00 35.00 Engineer 4341 Per Additional Excavation- Unpaved Area 20.00 20.00 Engineer 4341 Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 45.00 45.00 per 100 L: Ft. Engineer 4341 - Directional Boring or Tunneling (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 60.00 60.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Open Trenching (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) - Overhead Utility/Telecom Installation 5.00 5.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) 421 421.07 Subd. 3 Street Surface Repair 50.00 50.00 Per square foot under 10 square feet Engineer 4343 40.00 40.00 Per square foot from 10 -25 square feet Engineer 4343 35.00 35.00 Per square foot over 25 square feet Engineer 4343 430 430.03 Subd. 8 Installer's Licenses: Oil Burner; Stoker; 55.00 55.00 Building 4117 Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; Refrigeration, and Gas Piping Installers 435 435.07 Gas Piping Permit; Oil Burner, Stoker, Minimum Fee: Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical 22.00 22.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 Building 4115 Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4115 or Refrigeration Permit Fee Calculations: $0 to 1,000 16.00 16.00 * plus 3.10 % >$ 500 Building 4115 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 * plus 2.60% > $ 1,000 Building 4115 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 * plus 2.15% > $ 5,000 Building 4115 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 * plus 1.85% > $10,000 Building 4115 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 * plus 1.65% > $25,000 Building 4115 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 * plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4115 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 435 435.07 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is Building 4115 - greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 440 440.04 Plumbing or Water Conditioning Permit Minimum Fee: 15.00 15.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 Building 4112 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 - Fee Calculations: $0 to 300 15.00 15.00 Building 4112 H: \BUE 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20' 52 AM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Pro, i 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A `AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2010 11:52 AM $301 - -to 700 15:00 15.00 *-plus 1.75% >$300> Building 4112 $701 to 1,000 22.00 22.00 * plus 3.1.0% >$700 Building 4T1' 2 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 * plus 2.60 % >.$1;000'- Building 4112 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 *plus 2.15% > $5,000 Building 4112 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 * plus 1.85% > $10,000 Building 4112 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 * plus 1.65 %> $25,000 Building 4112 . 50,001 and over -933.00 933.00 * plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4112' * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 440 440.04 Installation or Testing of RPZ Backflow 27.00 27.00 Building 4306 Preventers 440 440.04 Subd. 1. Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building :4306 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, - equipment, hourly wages and fringe. benefits of employees involved.) 445 445.08 Surcharge for Prohibited Connection to 100.00 100.00 per month Building 4391 Sanitary Sewer 450 450.05 Swimming Pool.Construction Same as the, fees for a building permit (See 4,10:02,Subd.1, fees) Building 4111.. -. 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Swimming Pool 470.00 470.00 per year foreach enclosed pool'(partial or all of the year) Health 4173 License 310.00 320.00 per year for each outdoor pool Health 4173 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Whirlpool Bath or 170.00 170.00 per year-for each bath or.pool Health 4173 Therapeutic Swimming -Pool License -._ 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Sign Permit 150.00 "' 150.00 for reface or 50 square feet or less, plus an additional Planning 4185 3.00 3.00 per square foot for signs greater than 50 square feet. 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Courtesy Bench,Sign Permit 35.00 35.00 per year Planning 4185; ; 460 460.06 Subd 6 Sigh Variance Fee 350.00 350.00 Residential Property Planning 4361 700.00 700.00 Commercial Property Planning 4361 475 475.03 Subd. 1 Parking Ramp License 125.00 125.00 per year - 'Building .- `,4134 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Operational permits required by MSFC •55.00 55.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hourfee (Includes'supervision, code review, Fire 4322- Section 105.6 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Non - business hours inspection 80.00 80.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. Fire 4325 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Construction permits required by MSFC Section 105.7 except for those covered in City Code Section 625 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 27:00 27.00 *minimum fee Fire 4324 501 to 2,000 27.00 27.00 * for first $500 plus Fire 4324 4.00 4.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof -to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 80.00 80.00 * for first $2;000 plus Fire 4324 16.00 16.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and_ including $25;000; 25,001 to 50,000 450.00 450.00 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 4324 12.00 12.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction_ thereof to and including $5.0,000 50,001 to 100,000 740.00 740.00 * for first $50;000 plus Fire 4324 9.00 9.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof "to and including $1007000 100,001 to 500,000 1,140.00 1,140.00 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 4324 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or- fractionahereof to and4ricluding ,$500,000.. 500,001 to 11000,000 3,720.00 3,720.00 * for first $500000 plus Fire 4324 6.00: 6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and. including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 6,450.00 6,450.00 * for first $1,000,000 plus - Fire 4324 H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2010 11:52 AM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUE 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20' 52 AM 5.00 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% 70% of permit fee 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Code Compliance Inspection 55.00 55.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4326 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 615 615.03 License to Service Fire Extinguishers 100.00 100.00 per year per person licensed Fire 4325 620 620.04 Permit Fee for Cleaning Commercial 85.00 85.00 Fire 4321 Kitchen Exhaust Hood and Duct Systems 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees: Per Number of Heads: 1- 5 50.00 50.00 * (minimum fee) Fire 4161 6- 12 75.00 85.00 * Fire 4161 13- 25 130.00 135.00 * Fire 4161 26- 50 240.00 250.00 * Fire 4161 51- 75 320.00 330.00 * Fire 4161 76-100 380.00 390.00 * Fire 4161 101-125 420.00 430.00 * Fire 4161 126-150 450.00 460.00 * Fire 4161 151-175 490.00 500.00 * Fire 4161 176-200 520.00 530.00 * Fire 4161 201 plus 600.00 610.00 * for first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire Pump Installation and Associated 250.00 250.00 Fire 4161 Hardware Dry Valve Assembly 250.00 250.00 Fire 4161 Hydrant Flow Test 100.00 100.00 Fire 4161 Standpipe Installation 150.00 150.00 Fire 4161 Each Additional Standpipe 50.00 50.00 Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & alternative fire suppression permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 27.00 30.00 *minimum fee. Fire 4162 501 to 2,000 27.00 30.00 * for first $500 plus Fire 4162 4.00 4.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 80.00 80.00 * for first $2,000 plus Fire 4162 16.00 16.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 450.00 450.00 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 4162 12.00 12.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 740.00 740.00 * for first $50,000 plus Fire 4162 8.00 8.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 1,140.00 1,140.00 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 4162 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,720.00 3,720.00 * for first $500,000 plus Fire 4162 6.00 6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 6,450.00 6,450.00 * for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 4162 5.00 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% 70% of permit fee 625 625.04 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4325 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 635 635.02 False Fire Alarm 300.00 300.00 Residential Fire 4323 500.00 500.00 Commercial Fire 4323 H: \BUE 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20' 52 AM City of Edina Prol. SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 640 640.02 License allowing sale of Fireworks 100.00 100.00 Per year Fire 4137 716 716.02 Recycling Service: 7.50 7.50 Per Quarter - Single Family Recycle 4640 7.50 7.50 Per Quarter - Double Bungalow Recycle 4640 7.50 7.50 Per Quarter - Apartments /Condos (2 -8 units) Recycle 4640 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Food Establishment 610.00 610.00 High risk food Health 4171 380.00 380.00 Medium risk food Health 4171 110.00 110.00 Low risk food Health 4171 140.00 145.00 Base fee Health 4171 55.00 55.00 Beer or wine table service Health 4171 130.00 130.00 Alcohol bar service Health 4171 138.00 138.00 Food vehicle Health 4171 150.00 150.00 Additional facility Health 4171 200.00 200.00 Pushcart Health 4171 120.00 120.00 Itinerant food Health 4171 15.00 15.00 Food vending machine Health 4172 721 721.03 Subd 1 Restaurant Plan Review Fee 150 % of License Fee Health 4353 Restaurant Plan Review Fee for Remodel 100% of License Fee Minimum Restaurant Plan Review Fee -_ 125.00 125.00 Health 4353 735 735.03 Lodging Establishment 8.00 8.00 per room Health 4177 Supervised Group Home 45.00 45.00 Health 4177 Boarding and Lodging House License 105.00 105.00 Health 4177 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 48.00 48.00 per single tract of land (may contain more than one building under Health 4179 same ownership) 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 85.00 85.00 per garage Health 4351 Inspection Fee 745 745.04 Subd. 2 Body Art Establishment License 270.00 300.00 Health 4137 Body Art Establishment Plan Review Fee 300.00 810 810.09 Subd. 3C Neighborhood Property Owner List 1.00 1.00 per property owner name Planning 4361 810 810.09 Plat and Subdivision Filing Fee 200.00 200.00 per lot for division of one or more lots where no new buildable Planning 4361 lots are created 700.00 700.00 plus $50 /lot - all plats and subdivision other than above Planning 4361 810 810.09 Subd. 2 Developer's Agreement Fee for City 6.5% of the total construction cost of such public improvements Planning 4361 Services Rendered in Connection with Required Street, Water and Sewer Improvements 815 815.03 Antennas, Dish Antennas & Tower Same as for a building permit (See Subsection 410.02 Subd 1 fees) Building 4111 Permits 820 820.01 Filing of Application for Vacation of 445.00 450.00 Clerk 4391 Street, Alley or Easement 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Tree Removal or Grading Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Open Pit or Excavation Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2010 11:52 AM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H:1BUC 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20' i2 AM $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 845 845.04 Restricted Access Parking Lot License 500.00 500.00 Planning 4137 Renewals: 100.00 100.00 0 - 50 spaces Planning 4137 150.00 150.00 51 -100 spaces Planning 4137 250.00 250.00 100 - 200 spaces Planning 4137 400.00 400.00 Over 200 spaces Planning 4137 850 850.04 Subd. 1C Variance Fee 350.00 350.00 Residential Planning 4361 600.00 600.00 Commercial Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2A.2 Fee for Transfer of Land to Another 500.00 500.00 (One) R -2 Lot Planning 4361 Zoning District 600.00 600.00 (Two) R -2 Lots Planning 4361 1,100.00 1,100.00 All other Transfers Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2 -5 Mailed Notices 1.00 1.00 A parcel Planning 850 850.173 Subd. 4C.1a Temporary Retail Sales in PID Permit 400.00 400.00 First Permit Planning 4361 300.00 300.00 Subsequent Permits Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 4 A.2 Conditional Use, Permit 800.00 800.00 Fee shall be equal to City staff time expended and City's direct Planning 4361 cost incurred in processing applications. 850 850.10 Subd. 1 D Landscaping Inspection 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 6 Final Development Plan Application Fee 850.00 850.00 Planning 4361 850 850.20 Subd. 10 Certificate of Appropriateness Planning 4361 600.00 600.00 Accessory structure and facade change 1,200.00 1,200.00 New house 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees (per year) Police 4130 300.00 300.00 Under 200 members 500.00 500.00 201 -500 members 650.00 650.00 501 -1000 members 850.00 850.00 1001 -2000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00 2001 -4000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00 4001 -6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00 over 6000 members 8,755.00 8,755.00 On -Sale Intoxicating License - Restaurants only Police 4132 645.00 655.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale Police 4130 2,000.00 2,000.00 Wine On -Sale - Restaurants only Police 4131 200.00 200.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating - Max 3 days by MS Police 4130 87.00 90.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Police 4130 200.00 200.00 Sunday On -Sale License - Restaurants only Police 4130 1020 1020 False Automatic Alarm 25.00 25.00 for the first response per calendar year Police 4332 110.00 110.00 for the 2nd thru 4th response within one calendar year Police 4332 200.00 200.00 for the 5th and subsequent false alarm within one calendar year Police 4332 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit 21.00 22.00 Clerk 4137 1045 1045.05 Variance Fee RV's, Boats, etc. Storage 50.00 50.00 Planning 4361 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) H:1BUC 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20' i2 AM City of Edina Prod. SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2010 11:52 AM Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment Buildings Containing Four or Less 44.96 47.36 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 2.81 2.96 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 40.46 42.62 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 2.81 2.96 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 44.96 47.36 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 2.81 2.96 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 3 Industrial User Extra Strength Charges As allocated to City by Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 4.A Shutting Off or Turning On Curb Water For each turn -on and each shut -off. Finance 4628 Stops at Customer's Request or Due to Non - payment of Bill 35.00 35.00 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below Finance 4626 1.11 1.17 Up to 3500 cubic feet 1.47 1.55 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet 2.30 2.43 Over 6500 cubic feet 2.23 2.34 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area Finance 4626 Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.11 1.17 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 1.47 1.55 Over 3500 cubic feet Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.47 1.55 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 2.30 2.43 Over 3500 cubic feet Meter Charge: 13.48 14.22 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 18.36 19.38 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 20.95 22.10 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 23.56 24.87 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 37.95 40.04 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 144.13 152.06 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 183.46 193.55 Per quarter for 4 inch meter Finance 4627 Flat Annual Charges as Follows: - - Park Department for water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Finance 4626 - . - Street Department for water used for flushing street Finance 4626 1105 1105.01 Subd. 1 Service Availability Charge (SAC) 2,100.00 2,230.00 Per SAC unit X number of SAC units computed pursuant to Subsection Building 4307 1105.01, Subd, 1 of this code 1105 1105.02 Charge for Connection to City Water or 800.00 800.00 Water connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units Building 4116 Sewer System 400.00 400.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 18.13 19.58 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 1115 1115.03 Water Surcharges Surcharges for violation of the Irrigation Bans are determined based on the number of water restriction violations issued to an owner in the previous three years and are as follows: First Offense Written warning Second Offense 50.00 50.00 Third Offense 100.00 100.00 Fourth Offense 200.00 200.00 Each Additional Offense 300.00 300.00 1205 1205.01 Curb Cut Permit 40.00 40.00 Engineer 4344 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk CafLs Permit 640.00 650.00 Clerk 4137 1230.08 Temporary Liquor License Special Permit 315.00 320.00 Per event Clerk 4137 1235 1235.03 Subd. 2 Parking Permit 4.00 5.00 per month pro -rated Police 4751 Refund Parking Permit - Sticker Must 4.00 5.00 per month pro -rated Police 4751 H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/2010 11:52 AM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H:\BUL k2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20 52 AM Be Returned 1300 1300.02 Subd. 1 Refuse or Recycling Hauler's License 300.00 95.00 300.00 95.00 per year for 1 st vehicle per year for each additional vehicle Health Health 4178 4178 1311 1311.03 1311.04 Subd. 1 Peddler /Solicitor Permit Registration for Peddling /Soliciting 30.00 50.00 30.00 50.00 per permit - valid for 14 calendar days per registration - valid for 90 calendar days Police Police 4128 4128 1325 1325.03 Tobacco Sale License 365.00 365.00 per location Health 4170 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage Therapists 17.00 18.00 Per therapist for those businesses exempt from licensure Clerk 4137 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health Service or Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 285.00 290.00 Business License Clerk 4137 1341 1341.05 Investigation Fee - Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 Clerk 4314 1345 1345.05 Subd. 1 Sexually- oriented Business License 5,000.00 5,000.00 per year Clerk 4137 1345 1345.05 Subd. 2 Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 At time of original application Clerk 4137 1350 1350.06 Subd. 1 Commercial Photography 32.00 125.00 355.00 33.00 128.00 360.00 Manager Permit - Still Photography Manager Permit - Motion Photography Council Permit Clerk Clerk Clerk 4133 4133 4133 1400 1400.12 Truck Restrictive Road Permit 100.00 100.00 Engineer 4190 1410 1410.01 Redemption of Impounded Vehicle Fee as posted in Police Department Police 4334 H:\BUL k2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 11/29/20 52 AM CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-20 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGETED TAXES: PROPERTY TAXES $18,683,180 $19,712,348 $20,737,472 $20,737,472 $21,004,000 PENALTIES AND INTEREST 15,476 20,180 12,000 12,000 12,000 LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS - - 340,000 634,124 (327,000) 18,698,656 19,732,528 20,409,472 20,115,348 20,689,000 TOTAL TAXES LICENSE AND PERMITS: HEATNENT LICENSE 35,379 26,235 30,000 30,000 30,000 BUILDING PERMITS 1,873,338 1,217,654 1,400,000 1,380,000 1,400,000 PLUMBING PERMITS 145,760 124,114 135,000 130,000 130,000 HEATING PERMITS - 23,360 18,000 - 10,000 MECHANICAL PERMITS 379,474 264,097 275,000 250,000 270,000 GRADING /EXCAVATION PERMITS 2,826 5,192 2,500 2,000 2,500 DOG LICENSES 32,528 40,535 50,000 27,500 35,000 BEER LICENSE 10,336 10,642 12,360 12,360 12,000 WINE LICENSE 22,000 15,075 20,000 27,800 25,000 LIQUOR LICENSE 144,283 145,083 150,000 135,000 142,000 PARKING RAMP 3,375 3,375 3,300 3,300 3,300 OTHER PERMITS & LICENSES 7,363 7,386 3,000 3,000 3,000 SPRINKLER PERMITS 34,261 23,017 30,000 30,000 30,000 ALARM PERMITS 25,566 11,509 14,500 14,500 14,500 TOBACCO LICENSE 10,945 5,600 8,000 10,250 10,000 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE 92,862 96,472 100,000 93,000 95,000 FOOD VENDING LICENSE 1,110 1,125 2,000 2,000 1,500 POOL LICENSE 22,050 26,052 23,500 23,500 24,000 AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE 1,620 1,695 1,500 2,000 1,500 LODGING LICENSE 1,575 931 1,000 1,000 1,000 GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSE 14,485 11,435 13,000 13,000 13,000 PARKING GARAGE LICENSE 3,240 4,005 3,200 3,200 3,200 SIGN PERMIT 9,605 11,730 15,000 9,500 11,000 ROAD RESTRICTION PERMITS 11,800 4,820 10,000 28,850 20,000 2,885,781 2,081,139 2,320,860 2,231,760 2,287,500 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID: FEDERAL AID 18,937 104,906 36,000 36,000 36,000 STATE AID MAINTENANCE 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 OTHER STATE AID 148,321 126,973 100,000 51,000 51,000 STATE POLICE AID 342,661 338,684 355,000 355,000 355,000 STATE HEALTH AID 120,130 119,086 120,000 120,000 120,000 825,049 884,649 806,000 757,000 757,000 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENT AID CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 21 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY ' REVENUES SUMMARY 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED ESTIMATED -BUDGETED FEES AND CHARGES: BUILDING DEPARTMENT $ 8,761 $ 29,132 $ 30,000 $ 5,400 $ 25,000 CITY CLERK 110,936 8,862 100,000 6,000 6,000 FIRE DEPARTMENT 21,975 31,237 30,000 30,000 30,000 AMBULANCE 1,522,637 1,556,146 1,545,000 1,545,000 1,545,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 344,171 172,878 175,000 201,000 200,000 ENGINEERING 274,965 210,071 170,000 170,000 180,000 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 7,080 6,580 9,000 7,700 - 7,700 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43,290 16,536 27,500 27,500 27,500 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT 30,533 37,870 25,000 25,000 26,000 SERVICES HRA 32,122 28,377 21,500 21,500 22,000 PARK REGISTRATION FEES 98,026 103,530 100,000 96,000 98,000 SENIOR CENTER FEES 99,259 94,525 95,000 100,000 98,000 OTHER FEES 2,998 1,540 5,000 5,000 4,000 50TH & FRANCE ASSESSMENT 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS 374,088 392,880 393,168 393,168 395,604 3,039,841 2,759,164 2,795,168 2,702,268 2,733,804 TOTAL FEES AND CHARGES FINES AND FORFEITURES: MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 968,893 1,148,440 1,100,000 950,000 975,000 OTHER REVENUES: INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 260,249 37,668 109,382 109,382 115,919 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 129,302 191,136 195,000 195,000 200,000 PARK RENTAL 125,135 151,310 120,000 120,000 125,000 DONATIONS 13,171 28,367 11,000 .11,000 12,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 5,562 15,039 6,000 6,000 6,000 533,419 423,520 441,382 441,382 458,919 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $26,951,639 $27,029,440 $27,8.72,882 $27,197,758 $27,901,223 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM LIQUOR 742,800 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 742,800 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $27,694,439 $27,794,540 $28,637,982 $27,962,858 $28,666,323 ORDINANCE NO. 2010-20 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: SEC- SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF _T AMOUNT TION FEE /CHARGE 225 225.04 Special Events Application Fee $60.00 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Swimming Pool License $320.00 per year for each outdoor pool 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees Per Number of Heads: 6 to 12 $85.00 13-25 $135.00 26-50 $250.00 51 -75 $330.00 76-100 $390.00 101-125 $430.00 126-150 $460.00 151 -175 $500.00 176-200 $530.00 201 plus $610.00 For first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & alternative fire Then amount is: suppression permit. If total valuation of work is: $1 to 500 $30.00 * minimum fee 501 to 2,000 $30.00 * for first $500 plus 721 721.03 Subd 1 Food Establishment $145.00 Base fee 745 745.04 subd. 2 Body Art Establishment License $300.00 Body Art Establishment Plan Review Fee $300.00 820 820.01 Filing of Application for Vacation of Street, Alley or Easement $450.00 900 900.07 Subd: 1 Liquor License Fees (per $655.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale year) $90.00 Per event - Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit $22.00 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Sewer Service: 1. Single Family, Town $47.36 Per quarter up to and including Houses, Two-Family 1600 cubic feet Dwellings, Apartment $2.96 Additional from 1601 cubic feet & building with four or less over dwelling units 2. Apartment building with $42.62 Per quarter for each unit over four or more than four dwelling $2.96 per 100 cubic feet of water used units. during the quarter, Whichever is greater 3. Commercial and $47.36 Per water meter or approved industrial buildings, Sewage metering device on including schools and premises, or churches $2.96 per 100 cubic feet of water used During the quarter, whichever is greater 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Water Service: 1. Per 100 cubic feet for $1.17 up to 3500 c.f. areas of City, except areas $1.55 3600 to 6500 c.f. described in #4 below: $2.43 over 6500 c.f. 2. Domestic accounts used by commercial and $1.17 Up to 3500 cubic feet industrial buildings, $1.55 Over 3500 cubic feet including schools and churches. 3. Lawn watering accounts used by commercial and $1.55 Up to 3500 cubic feet industrial buildings, $2.43 Over 3500 cubic feet including schools and churches. 4. For Morningside area. $2.34 per 100 c.f. 5. Meter charge $14.22 per quarter for up to 3/ inch meter $19.38 per quarter for 1 inch meter $22.10 per quarter for 1 % inch meter $24.87 per quarter for 1 '/z inch meter $40.04 per quarter for 2 inch meter $152.06 per quarter for 3 inch meter $193.55 per quarter for 4 inch meter 1105 1105.02 Service Availability Charge $2,230.00Per SAC unit x number of SAC (SAC) units computed pursuant to Subsection 1105.01 subd. 1 of this code 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage $19.58 per quarter pursuant to formula in Charge Subsection 110.03 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk Care Permit 650.00 1230.08 Temporary Liquor License Special Permit 320.00 Per event 1235 1235.03 Subd Parking Permit $5.00 Per month pro -rated 2 Refund Parking Permit $5.00 Per month pro-rated 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage $18.00 Per therapist for those businesses Therapists I exempt from licensure 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health $290.00 Business License Service or Club, Reduding club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 1350 1350.06 Subd. Commercial Photography $33.00 Manager Permit — Still 1 Photography $128.00 Manager Permit — Motion Photography $360.00 Council Permit Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2011. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen -City Clerk w James B. Hovland -Mayor REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.H From: Jeff Long Chief of Police ® Action ❑ Discussion 0 Information Date: '• December-7,2010 Subject:. Resolution Authorizing Execution of DWI Enforcement Grant Program ACTION REQUESTED: Resolve that the Edina Police Department be authorized to administer a grant from the State of.Minnesota Department of Public Safety to achieve traffic safety objectives. The State of Minnesota is now allowing resolutions to be effective for a three year period in order to reduce the administrative time necessary to implement the grants each year. Thus, we request approval to accept this grant each year it is awarded through September 2013 without a new Council resolution. . INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Edina Police Department has been a grantee of and has participated in the DWI Enforcement Grant Program (formerly Project Night.CAP) since 2000. The DWI Enforcement Program is a statewide effort aimed at reducing drunk and impaired driving on our roadways with the goal of reducing traffic fatalities, injuries, and crashes.-The Edina Police Department has been approved by the Department of Public Safety, Minnesota State Patrol Division, to receive $7,700, in the project year 2010 -2011, to be used to pay for increased DWI patrol shifts throughout the year, pending approval and formal resolution by the Edina City,Council. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution copy. RESOLUTION NO. 2010-122 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT DWI ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Police Department has chosen to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Minnesota State Patrol Division, for the project entitled, DWI ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM, during the period from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Chief of the Edina Police Department is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Edina Police Department and to be the fiscal agent and administrator of the grant. . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby declares its commitment to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Minnesot ;;State Patrol Division, for the project entitled DWI ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM.' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the DWI ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM be effective during the period October 1, 2010 through. September 30, 2013. Adopted this 7th day of December, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk .for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21 2009, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010. City Clerk okite REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.1.1 From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Set Hearing (12 -21 -2010) for Planning Item: Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, YMCA — 7355 York Avenue. ACTION REQUESTED: Set hearing date for December 21, 2010. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: See attached Planning Commission report. e � 4,9jN�1.t'P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December, 1, 2010 2008 - 012.10 Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description The YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. The property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non - conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. (See location, applicant narrative and plans on pages Al —A21.) A health club is a permitted use within a POD. In 2009 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Low - Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild a new YMCA with a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The YMCA has abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to the existing YMCA facility. (See previously approved preliminary plan on page Al 3.) The applicant has already received the following approvals from the City: 1. A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned Office District -1. 2. A Preliminary Development Plan. (See pages Al 3.) (See Planning Commission & City Council minutes on pages A21a— A21g.) The applicant is now requesting the following: 1. Final Development Plan. 2. Final Rezoning. The applicant has revised the approved preliminary plans in an attempt to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission and City Council during the preliminary approval process. (See pages A6 A7, of the applicant's narrative regarding the revisions made.) The plan revisions include the following: • Pedestrian connection provided through the parking lot from York Avenue to the front entrance. • Drive circulation in the east parking lot has been reversed. • Parking lot redesigned and meets minimum parking requirements. • Landscape islands added in the parking lot. • Redesign of the north driveway entrance /exit. • A pick -up /drop -off area has been added to the front of the building for cars and buses. • Bike rack area has been added. • Handicap parking stalls added. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Yorktown Park and Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided park. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Yorkdale Townhomes and single - family homes; zoned and guided low & medium density housing. Westerly: 7500 York Senior Housing; zoned and guided high density housing. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.94 acres in size and contains a 66,800 square foot YMCA facility. (See page A3 —A5.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Zoning: R -1, Single- Dwelling District OA I r Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Mixed Use. A YMCA would be a permitted within the POD -1 zoning district, which this property is designated. Therefore, the proposed uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; The proposed Final Development Plans are consistent with Preliminary Development Plan including the modifications required by the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The addition meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements of the POD zoning district. The addition is also consistent with the existing YMCA on the site, and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; Parking requirements for the proposed addition can be accommodated on site. Additionally, a traffic study, done by Spack Consulting, concluded that the addition can be supported by the adjacent roadways. Therefore, the addition would not result in an overly intensive land use. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; Yes. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed addition. (See traffic study and staff report on pages A32 —A72.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 18, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See the minutes on pages A23— A26.) 3 t) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and As demonstrated in the compliance table on page 6, the proposal conforms to all Zoning Ordinance requirements. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Parking Health clubs are required 6 parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. There are two racquetball courts and 63,920 square feet of other uses proposed within the YMCA. Other uses include the pools, gymnasiums, exercise areas, office space, meeting rooms, and kid's areas. Therefore, 332 parking spaces are required on the site. The plan shows there would be a total -of 333 parking stalls (See pages A14 —A15.) Access /Circulation Access to the site would remain through the existing two drive entrances off York Avenue. Circulation would remain generally the same as exists today with parking areas on the east and west side of the building. The main building entrance to the YMCA would face York Avenue. The applicant revised the access and circulation per the recommendations of the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and city engineer during the Preliminary Plan review. (See plans on pages A14 —A16.) An east/west pedestrian walkway was added from York Avenue to the building. The north entrance was reconfigured, and that the drive circulation in the east parking lot reversed. Drive aisle width, and parking stall dimensions meet minimum city standards. Grading /Drainage /Utilities There are no significant changes to the existing grading, drainage or utilities on the site. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A22. Il Landscaping The applicant is proposing additional landscaping around the building and perimeter of the site. (See page A16.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 51 overstory trees are required. The applicant is proposing 52 existing and new overstory trees to meet the City Code requirement. A full compliment of understory trees and shrubs are proposed around the building, and within the parking islands. Building /Building Material The addition would be designed to fit in, or match with the existing building. The new building would be made of brick, metal and concrete panels. Windows would be added to the front of the building. (See renderings and building elevations on page A10 —A11.) The proposed building materials are considered acceptable by the Zoning Ordinance which requires the following: "All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: face brick; natural stone; specially designed pre -cast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction if the panel materials are any of those noted above; or glass or pre- finished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron). All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance." 5 Compliance Table gross floor area for all other uses. 332 spaces required City Standard (MDD -5) Proposed YMCA - Setbacks Front Setback — 35 feet 200+ feet York Avenue 35 feet 100+ feet Xerxes Avenue Side —South 29 feet (building height) 100+ feet 60 feet Side — North 29 feet (building height) 4- stories or 50 feet 29 feet & 1 -story Building Height 20 feet (street) ) 20 feet (Xerxes side to be adjusted) 10 feet (interior) west lot has an ) Parking lot and drive aisle setback 10 feet (interior) existing parking area with a 5 -foot setback) 8.5' x 18' 9' x 18' Parking Stall Size 24 feet 24 feet Drive Aisle Width 30% 22% Building Coverage 51 52 Overstory Trees (6 parking spaces per court for Six ) P 9 P Parking Stalls — Health Club handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square feet of 333 parking stalls proposed gross floor area for all other uses. 332 spaces required PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed final rezoning and final development plan. reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The YMCA has existed on the site since the early 1970's, and has fit well with the mixture of uses in the area. The rezoning would make the YMCA a conforming land use. Health Clubs are a permitted use within the POD -1, Planning Office District. Other permitted uses include office buildings, medical clinics, day care, and schools. The POD District is a less intense zoning district in regard to allowed uses, than the previously proposed PCD, Planned Commercial District, which would have allowed commercial and residential uses in addition to the YMCA. 3. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed Use. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study based on the previously proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed that document to determine if it was accurate. Both Spack and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the addition to the YMCA. (See traffic study on pages A32 —A72.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on August 19, 2010, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the minutes on pages A23 —A26.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from R -1, Single - Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Final Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 7 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility. The site would continue with a use that has been there since the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 4. The proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 5. The Final Development Plan is consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010. Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. Deadline for a City decision: February 15, 2011 IIJ A City of Edina Iz i�x : •+1 �! va ToRlPwn F.q PI ®:3202824240002 7355 York dive S Edina, MN 55435 4� 11� I s House Number Lv:1wis a ./ City Limits 'Al 0.4 Lake Names r Lakes PI ®:3202824240002 7355 York dive S Edina, MN 55435 4� 11� I sT41Nc Logarsd House Number Lv:1wis Strad Name Labels ./ City Limits 'Al CMOs Lake Names r Lakes Pons Zaning OAM I W06 W P. —I Dsr_t) ❑ SIDDd1��Derhs+rnRO»I yDDslv;� Da- : : „r.�l D;Cr.ell © 'JDD -0INrve D..elop,r_�tO�MI xD -,IP+. nwcen�+,Dnnal aPco.21PLnc�Cemra�csKD�r-�11 F7 PCD,71Pi.:—.D...l EJ p"""' O' OPip (Pbnncl lnCUAnN 0 -1 PontlPann��olr oa.n) O POD.71Pbnnm G!fm D:ev+�l PAD -, {PbnnalA .lcnvi 0nra1 PAD Ao =e: anal D—I PRD -71 PCn.oaAr_a:nl.s Dr_rl r7 PAD.= 1P-- R_icnt4l) —,l © PRO- SIP1.w A—a-4 Dr.—I PSA2 (Plmnetl SenurDarll Oql lSmpb Dx9mp unAl . Attaeue. Dx-�t]np uenl O AMD I E] Parcels 2009 Aerial Photo sT41Nc I WT .x.,1.24 7t01 3650 ai _ f • a fi Cwt + y �• . � ~# c4 .� 3 201 — ~- --r'-- ' � ! �' ,` � r e r � . �_ ``• 71st — `L 717, r 1 :. 1 .� _ � `�� 7 '201 �- � "* • `� j�_ �t ; �� re �o T 7235 723D t Z4 1iwE 1 f70. 74717 7014 4 "� I 711 ~ 808 ? 709 ` 24 1109 ti�N (j1002 �`+'T 703. - �•k h. 600 21 '0 °r- r 24 . s x127 913 414 525 7.7 _ _ t' z '. ,. �808y] 909 408 24 519 b •� 7 :. + .? k .�` •8p{ 905 4041. S1S if '800 X901 100' SYO-S `f•+ ���_. I ta : r t.. (�d ` �.�..i ' t oa.24- .501 t i , �- :, � Lr,�, °, • � �E 1 If! 13 205 - 1� �'� 1 1 •. �373r •2IkjOCi••••••DOsss���______313 r 'P.. 7401 7400'1" 6 st �..'`. •.�+. ` 104 102305 A 31D0 f7cl 24 r 'd "� •�`� M'h P 7413 1412 4 1 7425 7430 7429 7434 7401 k;� p _ 7433 7418 •`f 1 e r' p yr :Ot 2f i r y 7499 1 >r;� k. F 7504 n a u8 i . 0 0 f- r f � ` 7516 p'. p tlf ' •Y R 7.S 20 +:Y.. Iti00 -`-'. f .3205 201 70 a: Domes �a CJS C:v gelG, vY�SG1S24 0. =�"iF POW evyr� oo zz # at •�+1 / li = �I e Tin Ai 1r, AVE 4 r Yo Mold 4 /'n r YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Association Services 30 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 612- 371 -8700 fax: 612- 371 -8716 October 29, 2010 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Expansion Project Final Development Plan Review Dear Mr. Teague, Yn4CA We build strong kids, strong families, strong commuiuties. \NG1 *6 T o Q�N� ry9 of G� In addition to the information provided with the Preliminary Development Review, please accept the following and attached information as required submittal for Final Development Plan Review for the property owned by the Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis ( "YMCA ") located at 7355 York Avenue South. Preliminary Development Review Conditions for Approval The YMCA's preliminary development plans were formally reviewed by Edina's Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. The following is an outline of the conditions for approval from the commissions and the YMCA's response in the submitted documents: Transportation Commission 1. Improve the travel management demand plan. The revised site plan provides for added bike racks, simple access to the bus stop, connected access to the City trails and sidewalks. The YMCA will work with the City of Edina to formulate a plan acceptable to staff. 2. Improve the pedestrian safely in the parking lot. The plans have been reviewed to add a pedestrian access in the center of the site from the street through the parking lot to the main entrance. A vehicle /bus drop off has also been added to the front of the building to allow better vehicular flow and a safe drop off. 3. Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one out bound lane. We understand the intent was for two outbound and one inbound and have provided a revised design showing this configuration. 4. Improve the level of service at the northbound exit. Per #3 we have revised the entrance to increase the level of service. Planning Commission 1. Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with the preliminary Development Plan. The Submitted Final Development Plan is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan. 2. Final Landscape plan to meet all minimum landscaping requirements. The revised landscape plan has added the required plantings. As requested, the parking lot islands have been enhanced with larger plantings. Compliance with the conditions set forth by the Transportation Commission. See above. A YMG4 Southoale Expansion Project Final Development Plan Submittal Letter to Cary Teague - October 29, 2010 Compliance with all of the items outlined in the City Engineer's Memo dated 9.24.10. The revised site plan addresses the City Engineer's requests. Improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off and bike space should be considered as part of the Final Development Plan. The revised site plan provides better traffic flow and lot design as suggested by the City Engineer, which also includes a pedestrian access in the center of the parking lot connecting the front door to the street. A bus drop off has been provided along the front of the building as well as a bike rack near the front entrance. City Council Requested the same conditions as listed above Thank you for your time and consideration with this proposal and the City's continued support of the YMCA. If you should have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612.371.8724. You may also contact our representative, Steve Dorgan, of CresaPartners listed below. Sincerely hita Lancello Bydlon VP of Property Management and New Development Representative: Steve Dorgan Principal, CresaPartners 80 South 8`�' Street, Suite 850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612.373.0287 Email: sdorgan cresapartners.com Attachments A) Final Development Plan Application and Check for $850 B) Site Plan C) Floor Plans D) Proposed Building Elevations E) Landscape Plan F) Civil Plans G) Grading, Utility, & Drainage Plan H) Color Renderings of Elevations I) Building Material Samples /Photographs Page 2 of 2 el- 00 Existing Facility Photographs Existing Entry from Northwest Existing Entry from Southwest YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I fMCA SOUTHDALE r \� FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Existing Facility Photographs Existing YMCA from North Driveway Existing YMCA from South Driveway YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I TMCA SOUTHDALE ! ['k FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 METAL PANEL 1 METAL PANEL 1 MECHANICAL SCREEN INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE 40 YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITV EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS METAL PANEL 1 CANOPY INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE FITNESS ADDITION BWBRARCHITECTS zy oc�c�aEi+zu�o WOOD TRASH / RECYCLING ENCLOSURE PRECAST CONCRE"E LEISURE POOL YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I 'YMCA SOUTHDALE _ BWBH ARCHITECTS se ocTOeeH FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS SO�o r` OPP ' I I OUTLOT C\\ oll 1 ` I ol - - I "_ .�..� °�.• >D o r ?, -RkZ Hill ` J ( r I/ B L O dK 4 IF ,.. ii r — E . s E 1 '- - r ,a .r P +� r \ I 1 SAS CAS P,•v /� __tr�\� ��/ \ , \ °' 0 I • r iris mss ✓ if TIN i r� ��a 5 a 7 I tir J C, Q � pT � q) L CI k �.,I 0 A 6 Y P E GENERAL NOTES: LEGEND _ PROPOSED CURB AND CU7, ER Res ^' -a PROPOSED RETANN2 =41 L © PROPOSED PARtMr STALL Mr lD a eo PROPOSED NEW =CRETE SUJRF ^AM 05 S(ZE OF B'JRDWO KfER ADDfrkW 55.241 SOUARE FEE +FV,sx9'M r.: PROPOSED NEC ISiWLT 9X ACE Ii"JLGA'TIfQBa ID a, {`<a0010a ED DRFlaO;XR CA,1 RW 6 PJlrS .0! NET BLWJb INCREASE 16,22! SQUARE FEET BECAUSE 110 A PORRON OF THE B{ADM RFSEODEIS EXtSTM SUIDW- i ¢ ut-�RS� Dr unciEiT. PAR��F STRiin^ ar:J� :• T:z�s ar ,c ROrn .07 PROPOSED NET W:RFASE W WPFANOU5 CVJEts 11,467 SL FT. _� LAD VIN z WT¢ E WALL IINING f -vLL 4a Haim m"O" D Q1 — FOR EXISITNG ITEMS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 7Mei arr AREA (651) an CATCH 3 N oWADO'! H9i1ESOTA 70111. FREE I -lW- 252 -116Q 5 a 7 I tir J C, Q � pT � q) L CI k �.,I 0 A 6 Y P E GENERAL NOTES: SITE PLAN _ .DI TOTAL NUMBER OF OLS WO PARKMO STALLS 7FA. .02 TOTAL MAISER OF STALLS AFTER ADDMON 372 .07 SZE OF DOST04 BUILOM 79,027 S LAVE FEEL 04 SZE OF AMMON 21.070 S LWW FEET. r! lD a eo 05 S(ZE OF B'JRDWO KfER ADDfrkW 55.241 SOUARE FEE ScDle Tn Feet .0! NET BLWJb INCREASE 16,22! SQUARE FEET BECAUSE 110 A PORRON OF THE B{ADM RFSEODEIS EXtSTM SUIDW- .07 PROPOSED NET W:RFASE W WPFANOU5 CVJEts 11,467 SL FT. f LEGEND FOR EXISITNG ITEMS TC TDP Of CURB an CATCH 3 N —57ORN SOWER l7 TOP Of WALL 0 STORY "4H01E — •— SNIRARY SEWER CE CE 0 SAWTARY rWIHDL — I— WATERIWN SP SPRUCE Q HYDRANT cm lxr TR THEE (LEN) b WTE VAUVL RETANNO WALL WI WILLDW 0 PoW POLE — ws— UNDERCROUNO ELECTRIC u1 LONlIIEq.'S TaEE l!.:Hi POLE — w— UNb�fACUNO C45 0 —0 UGHi — ^' —FOECE W1N DEODIIDLS TREE D MUtt wNN0.E 4KRORNI O ELECTR,C TR roF ER - +~o- RALLPG O LLE ,C OUTLET 3- O W NETER .30 ` O POSE WOCATOR NALNE .na+ SPOT CtLVADON o eDo a�Rl; ywol [ I4 �NOr \ � CONTOLPIL ` �i ��� � • PD.o¢! Wog uwurm.r . � tC (.,rD) �o>�wra•r.nor .s s. � ��, Titj \� } ca T rruR a � \l4��� 1) v S NDT a N ,uN ,ou, Air �,�Ir 0 rT. T u vuw wawa s ntwiw„ n lair rr cwA �Cy 1 ,�'� r�. 9 Told ! 2 4 5 4 7 _ _ �� Iw"a<,s a r: ar.R .a •+.•o a ML+n34.00T F' V T I <` •. •: � I �• I '. INTERQtAL CUfIB 4 34—AUK ..i... ...D W R k I ! I RB IFOR -- - - - -1 �• �` '/IIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK si p 0 4r S tin rr�1ialliil [..t GARBAGE TRUCK FOR .5151. a CQNCRE7E CURB 4`J CONNEM EX CURB ECT ro EX CURB PN� NEW CONCRETE W NEW .(:dJGRETE O S X IrE FL ' ; -1 •-r.DO rf E :II _ 5 y • k2• ry OF 3-6 YN• STEPS :, n 9 LT RAILING ON SOUTH 5' NEW T NEW ASPHALT \ \\ 6100 BMA NG A DITIEIN r<. p IN7ERf9iAL CURB 3 9DEWAlI( n Ut li Qi U I NEW CONCRETE WALK •�c'•• CONCRETE WALK W/ 7ERO T]MB k OU7LI, "' 'T: NEW C WALK .'<!:�• • •¢ o 11 b ON BOTH SDES. ';if .•� ^^II C? AND ISLAND. 17.45 x¢zl E tt FIRST FLUOR = 970.7 t q) A99N0 k LET C� A� L r:H LiIWER LEVLL - 8383 ': F' l LowER MR. ro 1 .6 ,. p k A"Lo.w.1HC flAMP ' TCH ASPHALT. 1 ` • a i vG. R Itsl pn�R k J 1 py ALT I' 4. ° + 7358 YORK AVENUE SOUTH AC ALLS ALON i a 2 STORY &RLK &N-DIM ,' $ �� 3 ALOTNG MRS w f . i ! f;% NDICATI OM STALL OF ! .. Y HKi1 p ■ roNAT 71 [ IfQ pLi�, NEW CONCRETE WALK XS. NR 7EANA Y !£ FOR BIKE RAC='•I.' $ sI l a I I I �; u, a t �.1. Y _.ms A CEDAR k RETAININ I a I d0 }f :1111. J f 5_— AD 11f BLS 15 PATH TO BE ISLAND GUTTER I� 9 / . NEW CURB t G ITTER - --- y 4 1 n I I II I I I y SWW4" =74 BB970'.6-. 211390 74th St. W Nwv OF su= RCfiFLT. W-- G WALL LEGEND NW,.i F eNC NR, W RF LEGEND FOR EXISITNG ITEMS TO TOP OF CURB ®® CATCH BASIN SRIRM SEWER PROPOSED MRS AND GUTTER c.c c.rnu^nomccraco4 PROPOSED REINING WALL © PROPOSED PARKING STALL COUNT PROPOSED NEW CONCRETE SU RFAGE PROPOSED NEW ASPH&T SURFACE / PARIONG SiFiaWG m 48 FK111RS BEFORE DIC16Y G: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL twN an AREA (6511) DO =-2 MNIESpiA tau F1EE f- amo-ax-116B GENERAL NOTES: SITE PLAN .01 TOTAL NUMBER OF EXLSTING PARKING STALLS 334. 291.CG .02 TOTAL NUMBER OF 51,415 AFTER ADDITION 312 .03 SRE O EXLSTING R.UOING FOOTPRINT 39.023 SQUIRE FEET. p ,y .O4 SIZE OF BJLMNG FOOTPRNT AFTER ADDITION 53249 SQUARE FEET T .Ofi NET BUELY)G FOO1PRNi INCREASE 16.226 SOLHRE FEET. $,�W F «I .07 PROPOSED NET INCREASE IN 01PERADi S COVERAGE l l 167 SO. FT. sec s f IDs v Ac + NW,.i F eNC NR, W RF LEGEND FOR EXISITNG ITEMS TO TOP OF CURB ®® CATCH BASIN SRIRM SEWER TW TOP or WALL 0 slow IIANHOL SEWER CE CEDAR 0 SANITART —HOLE — WATERY.." SP SPRUCE O 11TDRANT CULVERT TR TREE (GEN) N CATE VALVE RCIAINING WALL �1 WI WILIDW 0 POWER POLE —s.— UNDERGROUND EL- l�M� CDNIFEROU6 TREE O LIGHT POLE --- UNDCRCFOUNa D YARD LIGHT l O UTARY --lE DECIDUOUS iiSE m ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER NG �Q +t O ELECTRIC OUTLET —FENCE O GAS MCTER CONCREI$�t Q Pp$T NgC11TDR VALVE OCONC \�Q \ \JJ � '' `� �'�, kA� •'^+ SPDT ELEVATION � t' \CONTOUIR _ - t YIYIWtNT SET. pMMWK 9 •cwLS uix• _ ��- . D6N9R5 BI.I YaYIA•�.T IDIKID :-' i Oi IXMORS vARan9 eTU_ [451"1 T CiOm � �1� (wrO) O[NORS MPWA�ON AS 9NNw ON rm rLrws NDT Bcn Tm,aF1m NND YAR e BWd n LOP NUT 6 HYOTAN] LIXARR GV As sHOw MISLED". SITE PUN ¢TV.elap n (am ov mIN• oADAI) IiF OR 1 1 ZVO.C! PROPOSED SITE PLAN a r BIKE RACK (24 BIKES) (D s M YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE BWBR ARCHITECTS OCTOBER 29, 2010 FACILITV EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS -W,-- A e F �' I � A 1 9 �6 t f I i I 8 �rI' If �s IFO.TN w c / / ti I I I I I 6 I I I \ I ' I I H ;g I � I I � a� W' � I I I a Pw, w IDe.Trow -� LEGEND Bu PROPOSED carlDles PROPOSED uem AND GUTEE! x toass2 PROPOSED SPOF EIEmm ii PROPOSED STORM SEEN — — — — — — PROPOSED S07 FExCE PROPOSED S EK4LN e 7 l 07 " 1 J I I FF = 970.5 } I �mo� 01 J LL m 858.5 II 5® I \ sar FENCE/ 7M5 YaW AWME SOWN 2 S70RY &WW BLaDWG e62sO �- :� a96 50 I �q I � r N I IW 6 e to 90 s GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN scdo In 76•s 2D1.cc GENERAL NOTES: I DI DR: CONMACIOR sFWl CONGCF All UnUW WARNQES MID HAVE SW COMPNICES LOCATE ALL LORRIES (PU&IC L' ARID PEYOTE) WDRE ANT COhSaI SON 3LW. BECK p D2 ALL ERa= CONTROL NF SHORN ON Tiff PLANS YUST BE wSTALLFD MOR TO COMLBHriMW OF CONsTRU mw OP RA1@S ARID WDWIED IODL All AREAS ALTERED ON THE STE FWE BEEN RESTORED. M NO C015TSCRON WY BECY ON THE SITE UNTIL V&'MW ON OF EROSSN CONTROL FACLMES HAS BEEN I!!9'ECfED F ARID APPROVED RY Tlff CRY. D+ NO CONSTRICTION MAY BEGIN ON THE STE UNRL THE CONTRACTOR HAS COORO°WOED A CONFEROM WrTH THE CRY. DS ALL D&RDS AND S SHRILL O w COW IOM Tiff CRT' rn' ED= ANTI TIE NBff MILE LTHEETE LDLTNS® Dbrt6a STANDOID9 AND SPECFlCtl10E15, CFAM SPECIHGTIDIS AND TwOOF SPESRiGO1pN6 CALL b WJRS BUM "C'*0 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL UPS=iWw C11T' ARQ (6.91) 'AN -0002 11x1 FREE 1-800-252 -1168 4W METAL MESH J 1 mx © HEAVY D= SILT FENCE LEGEND FOR EASITNG ITEMS 010 29 TO TOP OF CURB 0 ® CATCH BASIN —STM SEW,�L v TW TOP OF WALL 0 STORM MArOIOLE — {C .— SANRARY CE CEDAR 0 SANRARY MANHOLE — I— WATER°WN I SP SPRUCE TR TREE (DEN) C HYORANI M GTE VALVE CULVERT RETNNIN TT M'R1DW 0 POWER POLE — of —U... U C D CONOEROUS TREE 0 LIGHT POLE -- UNDEROROUNO GS O YARD LILTR —n —FORCE MARY OEOpUOUS TREE O UTASrY MAHOLE CUAMRAIL D ELECTRIC TRAIRiFORMER , RNLDr O ETiCTRIC OUTLET — - -FINCE od. O GS PETER CONCRETE CURB O Tc ID POST RIIOGTOR VALW OCONCRETE C®`! /•+ SPOT' ELEVATION ��e� \CONTOUR 170 1AD5I.DO O OO,Oaa fn xal .-- �. oemm,r Tr.E MANRFD 'RS zen.•� 2 • DOroTrs WoL MomAaNT F31D Q OFIIOf6 PWO4�O STAi1 —T D DNP» OD,OlES MFUO,ATm1 Ae aDW, Fm ,�/Wgrley �F 1 �E, YF � ; TSR PLWOI .OT IpR WA],m eENORw°c A Aj H CWROL F TOP HUT w HTDRANr LOGIN (N T AVw 5,1(M ISM 111E B'• CO MO of 1H[ SIBd°T PROPD Y SM Hh �� V t6FT .tt OF E- /L� I ARPA - E.iCess SI an Sn. AC 9 01.! i .I N41., " n Y NMI i r � IIIIIIIIIII' `` IIIIIIIIIII �vo� ono PLAN NOT FINALIZED �� , 9-j 0 'LO�o do C,°,� EXISTING GROUND LEVEL PLAN A2 A-) gtl 6 L � ' E UnNG BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN Al &A Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. Planner Teague explained that the property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non - conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. A health club is a permitted use within a POD. Planner Teague briefed the Commission that in 2009 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Low - Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild a new YMCA with a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The YMCA has abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to the existing YMCA facility. Planner Teague stated that in order for the applicant to construct the proposed addition, the applicant must go through a two -step process; a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning process and Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning approval. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Preliminary Development Plan. Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has been the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. � 1 5 ' pl'k 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. Appearing for the Applicant Phil Nylund, Minneapolis YMCA, Greg Hanks, Southdale YMCA, Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, Greg Fenton Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Teague if the Comprehensive Plan was changed for this site. Planner Teague responded that the Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2008 from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use. At the time of the amendment the YMCA was proposing a new building, parking ramp and four -story residential apartment building. The plan before. the Commission is a revision from the previous proposal. Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague if there are other zoning designations besides office to accommodate the request. Planner Teague said there are other zoning classifications; however, office seemed to be the best "fit ". Staunton noted that this designation would prohibit commercial. Applicant Presentation Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, presented the revised plan to the Commission, acknowledging that the revised plan was different from the previous plan. Dorgan explained that the Y is very excited about the project reporting it is an expansion that includes a new leisure pool, fitness center, studio and upgraded systems. Dorgan reported the YMCA held a neighborhood meeting prior to this meeting. Concluding Dorgan said after preliminary approval the YMCA would like to revisit two recommendations from the Engineering Department; the recommended sidewalk and revision of the north entrance. Greg Fenton, with the aid of graphics explained the revised interior layout of the proposed addition and the parking lot and vehicle circulation. Fenton noted, as previously mentioned by Mr. Dorgan that the sidewalk and revision of the north entrance recommended by the Transportation Commission and City Engineer impact the project. Discussion A discussion ensued with Commissioners raising the following: • If implemented as per recommendations by the City Engineer how many parking spaces would be lost. • Ensure easy access to the bus stop on York Avenue • Ensure safe on -site drop -off; especially for children being dropped off by a bus — there doesn't appear to be adequate room to safely accommodate drop -off — suggest a recessed area for buses. 6 Ob • Will the proposed increase in square footage and the addition of new amenities increase attendance? • Where would YMCA patrons park their bikes if they rode them to the facility? • Why was POD picked and not MDD as guided by the Comprehensive Plan? Mr. Fenton in response to comments raised said if the sidewalk is implemented as per the recommendation by the City Engineer 15+ parking spaces would be lost. With graphics Mr. Fenton pointed out the issues with the sidewalk. Mr. Dorgan said the Y would be willing to look into the possibility of recessing an area to accommodate buses and drop -off. Continuing, Mr. Dorgan said the majority of patrons park in the front parking lot. With regard to the parking of bikes Dorgan said that presently bikes are parked on the sidewalk, adding he would review the site and find an area to better accommodate bikes. Mr. Hanks interjected that currently the bus drop -off area has been sufficient. Mr. Hanks added that children need to be signed in so individual yehicle drop -off of children is rare. Commissioner Brown stated he understands there is conflict between what the applicant wants and what the Transportation Commission is recommending. He said there appears to be two conditions of conflict (sidewalk from York Avenue to building front, and revision of the north entrance from the west). Brown stated he wants those issues clarified before final approval. Continuing, Brown stated he also wants to ensure that there is adequate room in the front of the building for buses, drop -off and bikes. In response to the question of rezoning the site to POD Mr. Dorgan said the City's Planned Office District permits athletic facilities, adding it seemed the best fit. Dorgan said the ordinance as it stands today doesn't specifically describe the YMCA, reiterating the POD zoning district allows athletic facilities. Planner Teague added that rezoning the site to POD also provides the City more review authority if redevelopment was proposed for the site. If the site was rezoned to MDD the door is opened to commercial; adding if redevelopment were to occur on the site rezoned to MDD the City would be obligated to approve any use permitted in the MDD district. Teague stated an office designation is more restricting; reiterating a POD zoning affords the City more review authority on any future redevelopment. Concluding, Teague also noted office is a permitted use in the MDD zoning district. Commissioner Forrest said she disagrees that the POD zoning is the best choice, adding in her opinion a mixed -use zoning makes more sense and conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Forrest said if rezoned to POD the City is getting farther away from their goal of providing mixed uses. Commissioner Grabiel said that while this site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed -Use, rezoning it to POD (at the request of the applicant) isn't prohibiting a future rezoning to MDD. Grabiel pointed out this is a single use site, reiterating the applicant is requesting a less dense use of the site. dal(, Public Comment Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. No one spoke to this issue. Commissioner Brown moved to close the Public Hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continued Discussion The discussion continued on the traffic /circulation issues on the site, including concerns on traffic flow /pedestrian safety /bus safety etc. It was noted that the applicant wants direction on certain recommendations by the Transportation Commission and City Engineer (sidewalk, access). Commissioners commented that the applicant has received the City Engineer and Traffic Commission's recommendations; the applicant has expressed they have some issues with those recommendation, so how does the Commission resolve these issues? Planner Teague responded that the applicant would need to work with staff to meet the conditions required by the City Engineer and Transportation Commission prior to submittal of a final development plan. Teague pointed out this is the "preliminary" level of the process, adding the Commission will review this again for final approval to ensure compliance. Commissioners did express frustration with the process between the Transportation Commission and Planning Commission. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning approval based on staff findings; and in addition to the conditions in the staff report, requested that the applicant consider the Commission comments to improve traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest stated that while she supports the proposed addition to the YMCA she believes rezoning the site to mixed use is more appropriate. Commissioner Staunton said while he supports Commissioner Forrest's position on rezoning the site to MDD he supports the rezoning to office because it's a less intense use of the site. Commissioner Schroeder stated he supports the project at the preliminary level; however, for final review he would like to see more details and clarity on the plans. Ayes; Carpenter, Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Fischer. Nay; Forrest. Motion carried. A40 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 19, 2010 business. Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -104, approving a revised final development plan at 6905 York Avenue for CVS Pharmacy based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. And subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped September 15, 2010. • Building materials board, including colors, presented to the City Council on October 19, 2010. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Submit a copy of the Hennepin County access permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated September 24, 2010. 8. Execution of a proof -of- parking agreement. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council noted the drive - through was an accessory use and discussed whether it could be tied to the principal use. Attorney Knutson advised that was already a function of the code requirement. Member Housh called the question. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING — YMCA, 7355 YORK AVENUE — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -105 ADOPTED — REZONING ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -25 GRANTED FIRST READING Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan to construct a 15,300 square -foot addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. He noted that a year ago the Council had approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Mixed Use, Preliminary Rezoning to MDDS, and Preliminary Site Plan to construct a YMCA and 4 -story 130 -unit apartment. However, the YMCA had abandoned those plans and was now proposing an addition to the existing building. Mr. Teague displayed the site plan and explained the request before the Council was Preliminary Development and Preliminary Rezoning. If approved, a Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning would come before the Council. Mr. Teague noted that four affirmative votes were required since the property was currently zoned R -1. He reported the site plan concerns discussed by the Planning Commission to provide a safe pedestrian connection and the requested reconfiguration of the east parking lot to reverse the design. Mr. Teague indicated the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the September 29, 2010 staff report. In addition, the Planning Commission added a condition that the proponents consider improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian Page 7 All e Minutes /Edina City Council /October 19, 2010 connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space as part of the Final Development Plan. It was noted that the Final Development Plan would need to meet Edina Code requirements so a variance would not be necessary. Mr. Teague reviewed the current and proposed rezoning request and stated the Planning Commission and staff believed the rezoning request was appropriate since the use was consistent with surrounding uses and the YMCA had been in existence since the early 1970s. Proponent Presentation Anita Lancello Bydlon, YMCA Vice President of Property Management and New Development, stated the YMCA had been working on a revitalization plan for about ten years and accepted the recommendations of the Planning Commission. She advised of the market study completed to identify community needs and positive feedback received at informational meetings. Greg Fenton, BWBR Architects, displayed the floor plans and described uses within the renovated building. He presented exterior building elevations and reviewed the building materials. Mr. Fenton stated the YMCA looked forward to working with staff to address the five conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. The Council discussed site and building features and asked questions of Mr. Fenton. Suggestions were made to consider including a covered drop -off access, conveniently located bicycle racks, additional parking lot landscaping and /or rain gardens, and to increase the number of handicapped parking spaces. With regard to the bus stop, Mr. Teague explained staff would work with Metro Transit to assure a pedestrian - friendly location. Mr. Fenton reviewed the planned revisions to widen the access lane and indicated that pedestrian walks were incorporated into the parking lot. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:16 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the necessity and cost /benefit ratio of the rezoning, noting the YMCA was a permitted use in MDD. Mr. Teague agreed it was permitted in MDD and while that received preliminary approval, the project did not proceed to final approval so the site remained zoned as R -1. If the site were rezoned to MDDS, it would be entitled to uses permitted within that district which included more intense commercial. By rezoning to POD, the health club was permitted, and office would be allowed. Mr. Teague stated the Comprehensive Plan guided this property for mixed use, which would include residential and commercial. It was noted one Planning Commissioner had supported this application because of the less intense usage proposed. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -105, approving a preliminary development plan for the YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue, based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has existed since the early 1970s. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The final development plan must be generally consistent with approved preliminary development plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The final landscape plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. ��1 (� Page 8 \`� Minutes /Edina City Council /October 19, 2010 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. S. Improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space must be considered as part of their final development plan. And to grant First Reading of Rezoning Ordinance No. 850 -A -35. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — TRUCK MOUNTED AERIAL DEVICE — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for truck mounted aerial device, Edina Park Maintenance Department to the recommended low bidder, Dueco, Inc. at $77,219. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. REJECT ALL BIDS — EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS — BRAEMAR ARENA The Council asked questions of Mr. Keprios regarding the extent of the proposed exterior improvements. Mr. Keprios stated staff would reprioritize project needs because some may be higher than the proposed exterior improvements to the Arena. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, rejecting the bids for exterior improvements, Braemar Arena. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — TWO PORTABLE EMS ULTRASOUND SYSTEMS — EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for portable EMS ultrasound systems to the recommended low bidder, SonoSite at $20,000. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. SALE OF BONDS $9,225,000 G.O. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, SERIES 2010A — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -106 ADOPTED Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, presented the Series 2010A bonds that would refinance City Hall, noting it would save the City $1 million over the next ten years. He reported that five bids were received and recommended award to the low bidder, Piper Jaffray, at a true interest rate of 1.9 %. The Council thanked Ehlers' staff for its recommendation to refinance City Hall and City staff for its efforts to assure the City maintained its AAA bond rating. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -106 authorizing issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $9,225,000 general obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series 2010A. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. SALE OF BONDS, $2,595,000 G.O. BONDS, SERIES 2010B — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -107 ADOPTED Mr. Ruff presented the Series 2010B general obligation bonds that would finance street improvements and capital equipment acquisition. He advised that both Moody's and Standards and Poors had affirmed the City's AAA rating, which was a rarity in Minnesota. Mr. Ruff reported that three bids were received and recommended award to Beard of Milwaukee, at a true interest rate of 2.3098 %. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -107, authorizing issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $2,595,000 general obligation bonds, Series 20108. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 9 �ai � w�SN� , 411'L w � �y MEMORANDUM - Plan Review `'•���� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: November 19, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Southdale YMCA 7355 York Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the revised plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The site plan includes a revised north entrance that will improve the functionality of the entrance onto and off of York Avenue. • A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer with the building permit. This shall include all stop signs, one -way signs, HC parking signs, compact parking signs, etc. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works and MCES. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEngineering \General\Y Streets \7355 York Ave - YMCAV\pproval Process\20101119 review o17355 York Avenue South.docx 4aa MINUTES OF THE %�''� �`� Edina Transportation Commission o e �� Thursday, August 19, 2010 O Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean White, Geof Workinger, Nathan Franzen STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called order by chair Janovy. II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of July 15, 2010 and the Work Session Minutes of July 1. 2010 Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the minutes of July 15 with the following corrections or changes by Commissioner Sprague: Page 2: Sprague moved that they create uniformity and comvrehensive approach for local streets wath a and therefore, enact a Complete Streets policy. Motion seconded by Nelson. Page 3: Road DietlRe- Striping Policy "Sprague said Bloomington has..." Road Reconstruction The motion was modified that the ETC receives annual updates of road reconstruction and the CIP, with a focus on the 2 -year plan but information on all proiects in the 5 -year plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sprague. All voted aye. III. New Business a. 7355 York Avenue (Southdale YMCA Expansion) Chuck Rickart of WSB & Associates, the City's consulting traffic engineer, explained the Southdale YMCA expansion project. Mr. Rickart said the project was originally submitted in September 2008 as replacement of the YMCA with similar square footage and a 130 -unit multi - family housing complex and approval was granted by the ETC with minor median reconstruction at York Avenue and the north parking lot entrance; however, the project was never constructed. The current proposal is to expand the existing facility approximately 21,900 sq.ft. with minimal parking lot and other site alterations. The expansion would be used for fitness and aquatics purposes and it could increase membership by 15 %. The multi - family component is no longer included. Rickart said the development team was asked to look intersections previously looked at including Parklawn & York, the two accesses in and out of the site and the oval median north of the site. The traffic study analysis shows that the expansion will add 1,162 additional trips per day with all intersections operating at an acceptable level of service D, except for an E or F on some movements, most of which are onsite in the parking lot. As part of the travel demand management, pedestrian travel will be improved with maintenance of the sidewalk along York 03 Avenue, and creation of a new pedestrian walk from York Avenue to the front door. Additionally, approximately 15 -20 bicycle racks will be added. Based on the study analysis, Rickart said improvements are not recommended for the local street network. Staffs recommendation is "If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Commissioners' discussion included the following, followed by consultant's and staff's response: • Reason for stopping the study at year 2012 instead of 2020 — Rickart said it is best to look at the impact year (2012), instead of background traffic. • Report does not say if parking meets code — City engineer Houle said the Planning Commission (PC) reviews parking ratio. • South entrance is under - utilized, could almost be eliminated, explore options to increase usage — Houle said this entrance is only right -in /right -out while the other is both left and right. He said changes on York to accommodate changes to the access would require the County's approval and they tend to lean towards eliminating accesses. • Commissioner Bonneville said he likes the project but finds it difficult to approve a level of service E /F. Rickart said this is the current level without any crashes to date. Mr. Mike Spack, Spack Consulting, said they are defining average delay per car and if one car is coming out and has to wait one minute, this level of service is defined as F. • The island at the south entrance (on site) seems close for traffic coming into the park lot. Rickart said most parking lots are designed for drivers to go left or right upon entry, not straight ahead. • Can the travel demand management plan be improved on the site? Commissioner Schroeder said the PC can take a closer look at this. Spack said office buildings tend to have more control over employees; with the YMCA the controls will be more difficult. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the YMCA offer incentives that would spread usage throughout the day. • What would trigger a future traffic signal at Parklawn? Rickart said about 10 -20% increase in traffic which could be 5 -10 years out. After discussion the overall concerns were summarized as: • Improving the travel management demand plan (since the YMCA is heavily used by children and seniors); • Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; • Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and • Fire truck and ambulance access; Commissioner Bonneville asked if emergency vehicles will be able to move around the building. Houle said site circulation is the PC's purview and they receive comments from the Fire Marshall and the Building Department official. He reminded the ETC that their purview is the roadway and local transportation while site circulation, access, and safety are handled by the PC. Chair Janovy said they are finding it difficult to separate what is happening on site with the roadway because they work together. Commissioner Bonneville said there are some things that happen at entrances that affect the roadway severely so they should have the right to review those things because of the site itself and the function of the site. Houle said the Traffic 2 �a� Impact Analysis would need to be changed and the ETC would be more meshed with the PC to prevent duplication. Chair Janovy said in their last work session they made a motion to refer the TIA policy for update to staff and to have Assistant City Engineer Sullivan work with staff in the Planning Department, a couple ETC and PC commissioners to try and integrate the Transportation and Planning process better. Commissioner Bonneville motioned that the minutes shall act as the ETC's opinion as to the project's future and that the YMCA and Spack Consulting look into their concerns as stated in the minutes. Motion failed for lack of second. Commissioner Sprague motioned to accept the Traffic Impact Analysis that was presented and to include their three concerns that were raised as follows: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; and 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane. Commissioner Schroeder asked to amend the motion to read that it is their opinion that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent.transportation systems and request that their three concerns listed above be addressed. Commissioner Sprague accepted the amendment. After further discussion, the motion was restated by Commissioner Sprague that the expansion does not adverselv affect the adjacent transportation systems; however, the following recommendations are made: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Improve pedestrian safety in the parking lot; 3) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane: and 4) Improving the level of service at the northbound exit Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. All voted aye. Motion carried. b. Edina Police Presentation Sergeant Tom Draper, a night supervisor with the Edina Police Department, explained the operations of the Traffic Unit. He said the unit with three officers, covers traffic enforcement from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He said staffing is comparable to other cities of similar size. Sgt. Draper said they are required to spend a certain amount of time at locations that are called in by residents. There is a speed trailer that is moved around to different locations. He said residents begin calling around March /April to get on the list. Regarding stop signs, he said the requests are referred to the Engineering Department. He said enforcement is increased in problem areas for stop sign violations, as well as no turn on red. Regarding bicycles, he said is not aware that citations have been issued instead they are warning riders that they are required to follow the same laws as motor vehicles. He was asked about joggers in the road when there is a sidewalk — he said he is not aware of citations being issued. He said they do target speeders in neighborhoods and have found that most violators do live in the neighborhood, on 70th Street, for example, most of the violators are residents. He said officers do have discretion when to write a citation; however, most drivers have come to expect a 5 mph leeway. A moving violation citation is $150 and this is set by Hennepin County. He said public education would be helpful since most of the violators are in the neighborhoods. Commissioner Janovy said the primary focus has been engineering solutions to traffic issues. She said other communities are using different approaches such as training residents to use 3 A a�T- radar gun and writing down license plate number and sending a polite letter from the police department. Sgt. Draper said this has been discussed which is why the radar is out there. Houle talked a project called Project Lead Foot which he said is very much like the City's program but just not captured in the same way. He said traffic safety coordinator, Boyd, does go out and use a radar gun with residents and they are usually surprised to discover that the speed is not as fast as they thought it was. Commissioner Sprague said Chanhassen has found that raising awareness is the most useful through a traffic worksheet that they distribute to residents. Houle said many neighborhoods have their own listserve and this would be an inexpensive way to communicate. Traffic Safety Reports of June 2 and July 7 Chair Janovy said they agreed that the Traffic Safety Report would be put on their consent agenda. July 7 report — Section D — regarding the calls received from residents, regarding France Avenue Restriping. Houle said most calls are due to the restriping which causes drivers to slow down. Houle explained that Section D of the report is new and is to show the types of calls that are received and that the issues are generally resolved without having to go to the Traffic Safety Committee. IV. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) No update. V. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) No update. VI. Staff Liaison Comments a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update Houle approvals were received from Mn /DOT, bids are set to be opened on September 9 and construction spring 2011. Regarding landscaping in the boulevard, Houle said they will coordinate with residents to move and transplant plantings within a specific timeframe at the residents' expense. He said irrigation /dog fence is included in the construction costs. Houle shared materials from a personal rapid transit workshop that he attended. He said the presenter is willing to attend a meeting to explain how it works. VII. Commission Comments No comments. VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. 4 1 ha6 Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item III. B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: August 19, 2010 Subject: Transportation Impact Analysis — 7355 York Avenue: Southdale YMCA Expansion Recommendation: Agenda Item No.: III. B. ACTION: Recommendation /Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Spack Consulting on August 9, 2010, review memo dated August 2, 2010 from WSB and Associates and the following staff report. Staff and WSB have reviewed the Transportation Impact Analysis from Spack Consulting for the Southdale YMCA Expansion dated August 9, 2010 and believe the development team has met our requirements. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect to the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: The Southdale YMCA submitted a proposal in September 2008 to demolish the 70,000 sq. ft. YMCA building and rebuild a 72,000 sq. ft. YMCA along with 130 unit of Multi- family housing. The transportation analysis was approved by the ETC with the condition that the median nose on York Avenue, at the north entrance, be modified to match the proposed reconfiguration of the parking lot. The parking lot had a 150 foot exclusive right turn lane and a shared left/thru to accommodate the on -site delays. However, the proposed redevelopment as outlined in September 2008 was never constructed. The current application is to expand the existing YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 sq. ft without the addition of a housing component. Aal G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819_7355_York_YMCA.docx Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item III. B. With the revised site redevelopment the City required the development team to update the 2008 transportation impact analysis (TIA) with the most current existing traffic and projected traffic impacts. The TIA's objectives were to: 1. analyze the existing and proposed traffic operations of the following intersections: - York Avenue at Parklawn - York Avenue and the north and south YMCA entrances - York Avenue at the "oval about" north of the YMCA facility 2. Recommend improvement to the local street network, if needed. An initial TIA was submitted to the City and WSB for review in Mid -July. From that report a memo with 12 outstanding issues was created (dated August 2, 2010, not included in your packet) and sent back to Spack Consulting. The follow up TIA dated August 9, 2010 from Spack Consulting addresses all the questions and comments as outlined in the WSB memo. The Southdale YMCA's Transportation Impact Analysis shows that all study intersections will continue to operate at LOS D or better during all study periods once the facility is fully operational (2012). They have addressed travel demand management and pedestrian concerns to our satisfaction. In addition, no improvements are required of the local street network. The median nose at York Avenue and the north YMCA entrance can remain as is. A aK G:\Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819_7355_York_YMCA.docx Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: August 2, 2010 Re: Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study dated July 12'h, 2010 prepared by Spack Consulting for the proposed Southdale YMCA Expansion located on the east side of York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue A previous redevelopment project was proposed for the YMCA site in 2008. The original project included a new YMCA building with Multi- Family on the site. The previous plan, although was approved, is now proposed to be modified. The current proposed project involves the expansion of the existing 67,700 SF YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 SF. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared and reviewed as part of the proposed project in 2008. That study has been updated with the new development proposal. Based on our review of the updated Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study, the following questions and comments are made. 1. The original Traffic Impact Study indicated that the existing YMCA was 70,000 SF. The new Traffic Impact Study indicates the existing YMCA is 67,700 SF. This needs to be clarified. 2. The Land Use discussion on page 3 indicates that the total square footage with the expansion will be 91,900. Table 2.1 indicates that the total square footage will be 89.620. This needs to be clarified. 3. On page 4 the development phasing and timing indicates that the project will be fully operational by the "END" of 2012. The analysis looked at 2012 as the full build out of the site with background traffic. What would be the impact of another year of background traffic on the study intersections? This would provide a more realistic indication of full build out impacts. pc:AwseWA..%1EM0Wt.W. -0e0210 vMcn.a.. WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & Associates, Inc. Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: August 2, 2010 Re: Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study dated July 12'h, 2010 prepared by Spack Consulting for the proposed Southdale YMCA Expansion located on the east side of York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue A previous redevelopment project was proposed for the YMCA site in 2008. The original project included a new YMCA building with Multi- Family on the site. The previous plan, although was approved, is now proposed to be modified. The current proposed project involves the expansion of the existing 67,700 SF YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 SF. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared and reviewed as part of the proposed project in 2008. That study has been updated with the new development proposal. Based on our review of the updated Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study, the following questions and comments are made. 1. The original Traffic Impact Study indicated that the existing YMCA was 70,000 SF. The new Traffic Impact Study indicates the existing YMCA is 67,700 SF. This needs to be clarified. 2. The Land Use discussion on page 3 indicates that the total square footage with the expansion will be 91,900. Table 2.1 indicates that the total square footage will be 89.620. This needs to be clarified. 3. On page 4 the development phasing and timing indicates that the project will be fully operational by the "END" of 2012. The analysis looked at 2012 as the full build out of the site with background traffic. What would be the impact of another year of background traffic on the study intersections? This would provide a more realistic indication of full build out impacts. pc:AwseWA..%1EM0Wt.W. -0e0210 vMcn.a.. Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 2 of 3 4. Figure 2.2 shows the proposed concept plan. A more detailed figure should be provided showing the existing medians on York Avenue in association with the site driveways. 5. The existing analysis indicates that the north YMCA access experiences longer delays during the PM peak hour. How does this impact the existing site circulation? 6. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event. How does the parking compare with what is required by Zoning? 7. Figure 3.4 does not show existing "Stop Signs" for the YMCA access driveways. It is implied in the text that they are there. If not they should be added with this project. 8. Figure 3.8 shows existing Average Daily Traffic volumes from 2005. 2009 volumes are now available. This figure should be updated. The other figures (4.13) and analysis associated with the ADT volumes should also be updated. 9. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the North Site entrance will have some movements at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. • The overall Level of Service at the North Site entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement at LOS F. If another year of background traffic were to be assumed how, would the North Site entrance intersection be impacted? • The queuing analysis indicates that there may be "significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the AM and PM peak hours ". How does this significant queue get handled on the site? • The queuing analysis in the previous study and for the AM condition shows 150 foot storage for the westbound through, left and right at the North Site access intersection. The PM peak shows a 600 foot available storage. This appears to be a typo. If that is the case the PM peak queue will be in excess of the available storage. This should be mitigated. 10. No mitigation is recommended with the proposed expansion. The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis from the previous study recommended adding a right turn lane on York Avenue and a westbound right turn lane at the North Site entrance. The queue analysis does not show a significant improvement from the original study to the current study. Why are these improvements not being recommended now? X30 Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 3 of 3 11. The study discusses the use and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It should be expanded to include, how people at the YMCA can get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided / available? 12. A general discussion on pedestrian / bike accommodations should be provided. A figure similar to that provided with the previous study should be included showing existing and planned sidewalk and bike facilities. Will YMCA have bike racks or other amenities for pedestrians? If so, where are they in relationship to the sidewalk and trail facilities? Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the traffic impact study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. K31 cswse1FAmwm O- wnowc-0aonoroomaoc Sack THE TRAHIC STUDY COMPANY .:.: A its ' : y .... -Pi o ,. >r�tr�w +ar4l ray I s T Traffic Impact Stud Southdale YMCA Expansion Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By:'! MichaA P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: August 9, 2010 �3a TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary .......................... ..............................1 2. Proposed Development and Study Area ... ............................... 3 3. Existing Traffic Conditions ......................... ............................... 7 4. Projected Traffic .......................................... .............................16 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis ........... ............................... 32 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ...... ............................... 36 7. Appendix ...................................................... .............................37 LIST OF FIGURES Figure2.1 - Location Map .................................................... ..............................5 Figure 2.2 - Concept Plan .................................................... ..............................6 Figure 3.1 - Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking .. ..............................9 Figure 3.2 - Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking ... ..............................9 Figure 3.3 - Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking ........ .............................10 Figure 3.4 - Existing Conditions ........................................ .............................11 Figure 3.5 - Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................12 Figure 3.6 - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................13 Figure 3.7 - Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic ............. .............................14 Figure 3.8 - Existing Daily Traffic ....................................... .............................15 Figure 4.1 - Trip Distribution .............................................. .............................19 Figure 4.2 - A.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development .........................20 Figure 4.3 - P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..........................21 Figure 4.4 - Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..................22 Figure 4.5 - Daily Volumes Due to Development .............. .............................23 Figure 4.6 - 2012 No -Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................24 Figure 4.7 - 2012 No -Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................25 Figure 4.8 - 2012 No -Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ............................26 Figure 4.9 - 2012 No -Build Daily Volumes ......................... .............................27 Figure 4.10 - 2012 Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................28 Figure 4.11 - 2012 Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................29 Figure 4.12 - 2012 Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ... .............................30 Figure 4.13 - 2012 Build Daily Volumes ............................. .............................31 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 - Before /After Square Footage of Uses .............. ..............................4 Table 3.1 - Existing Level of Service ( LOS) ........................ ..............................8 Table 4.1 -Trip Generation .................................................. .............................18 Table 5.1 - 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .......................32 Table 5.2 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .............................32 Table 5.3 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results ......... .............................34 f� 3 3 Southdale YNACA Expansion i Traffic Impact Study 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. They are proposing to build an approximately 21,900 addition onto the approximately 67,700 square foot YMCA. The purpose of this report is to determine if completion of this addition will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system. The study objectives are: i. Determine how the existing York Avenue South intersections at Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road currently operate. ii. Determine if the existing Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road will operate with acceptable vehicle delays and stacking after the addition is fully occupied in 2012. iii. Recommend improvements if needed. A traffic study was prepared in 2008 for a proposed redevelopment, which included housing. The current proposal eliminates housing and is limited to expanding the existing YMCA. Based on discussions with City of Edina staff, this traffic study updates the report from 2008 to account for the proposed expansion project. b. Executive Summary The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. The facility currently has approximately 67,700 square feet and the addition is proposed to add approximately 21,900 square feet. The site is located in Edina, MN on York Avenue South between Parklawn Avenue and the traffic circle south of Hazelton Road. Access to the site will be from two existing intersections on York Avenue South. The north intersection is a full intersection and the south intersection is a right in /right out intersection. City staff has requested a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic impacts of the redevelopment on the adjacent roadways for 2012 (when it is assumed full occupancy will occur). The intersections studied are: Southdale YN/ICA Expansion 1 Traffic Impact Study ® York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue ® York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance ® York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road The principal findings of this study are: i. The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. ii. The maximum queues at the study intersections are anticipated to be contained within the existing lanes through the 2012 Build scenario. iii. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. iv. Based on the parking analysis completed for the redevelopment, it is anticipated that providing 297 total parking spaces for the site will be adequate. To adequately mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development, the following improvement plan is recommended: i. Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. ii. Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: ® The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. � 1 Southdale YNACA Expansion Z Traffic Impact Study • The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. • The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 2. Proposed Development and Study Area a. Site Location The proposed development site is located on York Avenue South north of Parklawn Avenue and south of the traffic circle located south of Hazelton Road in Edina, MN. The existing site driveways are planned to remain unaltered with the expansion project. See Figure 2.1 for a location map. It shows the location of the study intersections, which are: • York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue • York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road b. Land Use and Intensity The existing YMCA is approximately 67,700 square feet. Note the 2008 Traffic Study listed the existing YMCA as 70,000 square feet, but that figure did not account for stairwells, mechanical rooms, etc. per Edina City Code. The proposed addition will add approximately 21,900 square feet, bringing the total square footage to approximately 89,620 square feet. The site will provide 297 parking stalls after the expansion project is complete (a reduction of 40 stalls from the existing 337). Table 2.1 shows the uses in the existing facility as well as the uses planned to be in the facility after the remodeling /addition project are complete (along with their associated square footages). Southdale YNACA Expansion 3 Traffic Impact Study Table 2.1 — Before /After Square Footage of Uses YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Development Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. 4r Southdale YMCA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study Square Footage Square Footage Use Before Expansion After Expansion Fitness Spaces (cardio, weights, studios, racquetball 20,570 33,450 together, walking track Locker Rooms 11,140 10,560 Aquatics (pools and Jacuzzi) 6,800 10,500 Drop -in Childcare 5,255 5,510 Staff (offices, conference) 2,010 2,360 Total Area (including hallways, mechanical 67,720 89,620 spaces, etc. YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Development Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. 4r Southdale YMCA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study S p'a c k Location Maps YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Adbusar —%* Study Intersections Southdale WICA Expansion Fiaure 2.1 5 Proposed Site Traffic Impact Study North No Scale s. UD Ora tu am obi W — � 911 Pddkv 19 -up. ct —6 ►.A St. F-1 TI, �41 " 'r 77 r IN Up pp.. V.K.y 5 Proposed Site Traffic Impact Study North No Scale Spack Figure 2.2 Concept Plan YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Driveway Remains Unaltered New Sidewalk Planned from York Avenue to Front Door Driveway Remains Unaltered 15 to20 Bike Racks Planned Near Front Door Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects. ' ” Southdale YMCA Expansion 6 i � Traffic Impact Study . „� .r 'A �i e� Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects. ' ” Southdale YMCA Expansion 6 i � Traffic Impact Study 3. Existing Traffic Conditions a. Physical Characteristics Access to the site will be provided by two existing intersections on York Avenue South, York Avenue South is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31 and is designated as a Major Collector by Hennepin County. Parklawn Avenue is a City street and is designated as a collector by the City of Edina. Existing traffic control, speed limits, and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.4 for each study intersection. Figure 3.4 shows the stop signs that physically exist, although all driveways are legally stop condition. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of York Avenue near the site. No roadway improvements are scheduled near the site. b. Traffic Volumes The weekday a.m., weekday p.m. and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted in 2008 at the study intersections (see Figures 3.5, 3.6 & 3.7). The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods align with typical rush hours. The YMCA classes have the heaviest attendance during the morning on Saturdays. Since the traffic patterns in the area are most impacted by the shopping district, it is believed the late a.m. period on Saturday has the heaviest combination of site traffic and background traffic. The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The daily traffic volumes for the area roadways are shown on Figure 3.8. c. Level of Service Los A w LOS d = Acceptable -s- LOS F = JnaccepfaWe 4 Source: City of San Jose, CA Southdale YMCA Expansion An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are assigned a Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is considered acceptable in urban conditions. Individual movements are also assigned LOS grades. One or more individual movements typically operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled 7 Traffic Impact Study intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual movements. The LOS results for the 2008 study hours are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4 (all driveway exits are treated as having stop control, which they are legally, even if a stop sign isn't present). The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.5 through 3.7 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The SYNCHROTM model was created for this project since the study intersections are not part of the city's existing model. The intersections will be added to the city's model if the project is approved and constructed. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 3.1 — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/C B/ F A/ D York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / B A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A/C A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A / B A/C A / C Note: I he first letter Is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections operate acceptably at LOS B or better in the existing a.m. weekday, p.m. weekday and Saturday midday peak hours. As often happens along busy corridors such as York Avenue, some individual side street movements experience longer delays while the overall intersection operates acceptably with little overall delay. The eastbound and westbound approaches at the York Ave /North YMCA Entrance currently experience LOS F in the weekday p.m. peak hour. The eastbound approach currently experiences LOS F at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the weekday p.m. peak hour while the westbound approach experiences LOS E. d. Parking Volumes Parking capacity was determined to be 337 stalls combining spaces on both the west and east sides of the existing facility. Data on the actual number of cars parked was collected immediately prior to all three data collection timeframes. This beginning number was then adjusted based on the turning movement counts completed at the r; Southdale YMCA Expansion 8 Traffic Impact Study site's driveways to provide a total number of cars.in the lots in fifteen Minute increments. Following in: Figures 3.1 through 3.3 .are the results of this data collection. Additional details are contained in the appendix. Figure, 3.1 - Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking 400 350 350 4'- tip- ,: 300 sg 250 'i011tl N 200 ! ✓r �.. { �.�}tk� �; -Occupied Ov Capacity 150 IL ©Occupied am 200 100 -Capacity 50 150 IL 0 10l) a Q a Q a a Q a a C) Uj o to o L0 C) LC) o M �f O 7 M it O 7 M 00 00 00 00 M M M Figure 3.2 Existing Weekday'PM Peak Period Parking, 400 350 4'- tip- ,: c 7•.: 300 'i011tl ! ✓r �.. { �.�}tk� �; off: \i r`YI 250 ©Occupied am 200 -Capacity 150 IL 10l) 50 0 c c C C C cc C cv C C C G CC cc cc 'C C .- C a a a O_ a a a a_ a d d L Lo U (D (0 (0 Aa' � i. •^ 4'- tip- ,: c 7•.: 'i011tl ! ✓r �.. { �.�}tk� �; off: \i r`YI Figure 3.3 Existing'Saturday Peak Period Parking 400-. 350 H 300' �9 250 — Occupied 200 ®Capacity �a 150 100 50 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Q ¢ Q Q ¢ ¢ a a a C9 d' O M O 7 77 M O O N N (V The maximum number of occupied spaces during the study periods was 177 spaces. Average occupancy, based on the available 337 parking spaces, was 40% of capacity. Following are the high and low occupancy rates for each time period: • Thursday a.m. -high 53% and low 31% • Thursday p.m. — high 42% and low 29% • Saturday — high 47% and low 27% e. Data Sources The sources for the data sited above are: • Turning movement counts — Traffic Data-Inc. • Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting • Concept plan — BWBR Architects • Daily traffic volumes— Mn /DOT traffic flow maps Southdale YMCA Expansion Spack TFAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Existing Lanes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN :�iK•T 44 Traffic Circle NW Z 4 Traffic Circle SW M V Apartment North Driveway W Bus Stop (Routes 538, 539, 578) Apartment South Driveway ■ 30 mph I 0 m c 0 t CL E LO M Circle NE Traffic Circle SE �► (enter only) Pedestrian Underpass YMCA North Driveway ® Bus Stop (Routes 538, 539, 578) YMCA South Driveway If* 0 iaure 3.4 Southdale YMCA Expansion 11 Traffic Impact Study T North No Scale S ..a c k THE PTRAIrIC .TIDY COMPANY Existing Ali Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue t 0 N m 7 C m a oil Southdale YMCA Expansion 12 Traffic Impact Study Figure 3.5 Worth No Scale Sack. PTHE M T YArFiC SZUDY.CQf4PAY Existing FM -Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN m 4MEW 16 o 24 +mlw 19 Z co co North h Driveway Traffic Circle NW CO N m V' CO W 6 25 ==Io, a-• o 16 mi Traffic Circle SW r.iSouth L 73 "'I:m 4�0 4j 14 /.�43 7J ti1 0 E00110 4 N N °° � Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway r_ e� 7 O In d 7 C Q Y O } Southdale YMCA Expansion 13 .Figure 3.6 North No Scale L 14 \ 4�6 '1tr to to CO �n o CO Traffic Circle NE Driveway 93� �� 84 + Traffic Impact Study lic C ircle SE m �ltL=22 o +mlw co co North h Driveway 6 m a-• o r.iSouth Driveway 93� �� 84 + Traffic Impact Study ackS FmJV�LfL7'1>AtIG Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue c 0 m c d a 0 Figure 3.7 North No Scale Southdale YMCA Expansion 14 Traffic Impact Study Sack P4 TH[ TP.Arric STUDY COMPANY Existing Daily Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN tc Circle NE fie Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway LEGEND North No Scale 2009 Average Annual Daily 40 Traffic Volumes source: MNDOT Traffic Flow Maps Southdale YMCA Expansion 15 (�L4 Traffic Impact Study 4. Projected Traffic The assumptions described in this section were reviewed by City of Edina engineering staff before the forecasts in this section were developed. a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed YMCA expansion based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The Weekday a.m. peak hour trip generation is for the 'one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 7 -9 a.m. The Weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation is for the `one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 4 -6 p.m. The Saturday peak hour trip generation is for the "peak hour of generator". In addition a 15% growth factor was applied to the existing entering and exiting peak hour volumes. This represents the possible maximum growth in membership. The resultant trip generations are shown in Table 4.1. No trip reductions for pass -by or diverted trips were made. It is assumed all of the trips for the site will be newly generated. Also, there is bus service available near the site on York Avenue but no trip reductions were taken for transit use. These assumptions result in a more conservative analysis. The directional orientation of the generated traffic is shown in Figure 4.1. This orientation is based on a weighted distribution of the traffic volumes currently using York Avenue South. The daily traffic volume on each road segment was divided by the sum of the daily traffic volumes on the road segments to develop the directional orientation. The a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, Saturday peak hour and daily trips generated by the site were assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5. These traffic volumes will be added to the existing traffic volumes to develop the build -out conditions. b. Non -site Traffic Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 scenario by applying a 0.92% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 year growth factor of 1.2 the Mn /DOT State Aid office assigned to .Hennepin. County in 2008. The 2012 No -Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. A" Southdale YMCA Expansion 16 Traffic Impact Study c. Total Traffic for 2012 Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development, as shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5, to the No -Build volumes shown in, Figures 4.6 through 4.9. The resultant 2012 Build traffic forecasts are shown in Figures 4.10 through 4.13. AS1 Southdale YMCA Expansion 17 Traffic Impact Study SpY ack AFFIC S1UD COMPANY Table 4.1 Forecast Trip Generation YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Daily Volumes LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS (GFA) QUANTITY DAILY RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 330 330 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 22.88 60% 50°/ 0% 0 0% 0 261 261 TOTALS 0 0 581 681 AM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY AM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 29. 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.62 61% 39% 0% 0 0% 0 22 14 TOTALS 0 0 51 35 PM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY PM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 26 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.45 37% 63% 0% 0 0% 0 12 20 TOTALS 0 0 38 41 Saturday Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY SAT RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% In Membership Growth 14 22 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.07 541/6 46% 0%_ 0 0% 0 13 11 TOTALS 0 0 27 33 NOTES: 1. GFA = Gross Floor Area 2. YMCA Expansion Daily = 2.76 x normal ITE rate for existing 67.7 KSF x 15% growth 3. YMCA Expansion Peak Hours =15% growth x existing entering and exiting volumes 4. All other trip generation rates based on "Trip Generation ", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition unless otherwise noted. S. All other A.M. Trip Generation Is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7:00 & 9:00 am.). 6. All other P.M. Trip Generation Is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4:00 & 6:00 p.m.). 7. All other Saturday Midday Trip Generation Is for the peak hour of generator 8. No Saturday peak hour trip generation is available for ITE Code 253 - assume Saturday is the same as pm peak hour. "�uthdale YMCA Expansion 1P Traffic Impact Study 0 Figure 4.1 Trip Distribution YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale .v '.4t VJ .! I Y.. •�Itf�t ~l .y h. I. � •.E a<. � � �' { a: � ��.. `� • . � z Ica►. �. �.• - � C M Ab of p,.• � � j I vl Southdale YIOCA Expansion Asa Traffic Impact Study Sp.ack A GM AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Figure 402 North No Scale 0 U) d 3 C d a 0 b5.3 Southdale WCA Expansion 20 Traffic Impact Study S ac 9"BOK� PHE = @AFFIC C STUDY COMPANY EWure.4.3 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development .YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MIN No Scale L o C+M% �0 . O O N Traffic Circle NE O N O 4j, t* 0J i 0� o� N O o' Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE Leo Lo O O N 4� e - � 20 4 1 ° 0� o� Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway L o oNo 4�0 Apartment South Driveway *j 1 LO r o MCA South Driveway 01 hif' ° y-E* p N O o i Parklawn Avenue r w 0 Tn d c Q 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 21 C J \ Traffic Impact Study c-;k -THE •RAPFIC STUDY COMPANY - Figure 4.4 Saturday Peak flour Traffic Volumes Due to Development . ' - t. YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Apartment South Driveway R_ r� 0 0 U) m 7 C m a Y O Southdale YMCA Expansion 22 a', c THE TRAFFiC.STUDY COMPANY Daily Traffic Volumes Due. to Development YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN 6 Southdale YMCA Expansion 23 igure 405 North No Scale is Circle NE fic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway AS-IV Traffic Impact Study S pz�FlTRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 AM Peak Hour NO -Build Traffic Volume .s - YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN 0 ° m ♦e 10' jr 30 20 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE ° C' O 0 O N to -7 Figure 4o6 North No Scale L 40 \ ♦� 30 0 0 0/ CO 60 + T ( 40 mull- 20 m.> g o 20 Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE 0 o L 70 ° 20 r60 �! ,oJ �tr►� try N f` m m 20y " 0q `) i Apartment North Driveway YMCA North n 001 Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Southdale YMCA Expansion y ° tD N O IYMCA South Driveway { 50 o=moo- / 20 m% L10 4-0 r,o '1 t 11♦ j 0 U) m c aa' Q 0 24 Traffic Impact Study SDack rwi F=-X hN TEliii�.�� Figure 4.7 HE TRAFFIC STVDY COMPANY 2012 PM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes It YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale o L,o m X20 4�,0 41 30 20ml Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE � . °m o I m n 'I1L 30 ■�► \20 E Traffic Circle SW �Traffic'Circle E / c L 80 30 ==10- o 4� 0 4 ! 4 r 40 ,o J '1 1 f 0—► \� �° m Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn L 7 O N m 7 C m Q Y } YMCA North qtr► 000 v m •-� 70 J j j 30 ==10- o o rn o L L 20 o CO sJ l t r► 0 HOOO:. L ,0� � 0 r,o South Driveway Southdale YMCA Expansion 25 Traffic Impact Study Southdale YMCA Expansion 25 Traffic Impact Study Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn o n o h N r YMCA South Driveway 1 { 70 4 0 y 20ol L 10 js 0 �. 10 oao r 0 m c m a o - - r Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Traffic Impact Study :S ck T COMPANY figure: -4o8 2012 Saturday Peak H ur No -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale o L 20 4� 10 4mEm 20 ® 4r 40 0 0 0 30 y i M m .- � Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE 0 N W n 4j1t* so 1 iii 20 my 10 =Milk N o 20 Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE to O L 100 o L 0 1 f% t* 1 4� 0 r 50 10J °v 0� 10 01W ° N ° Ln YMCA North Driveway 10 � V) u� Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn o n o h N r YMCA South Driveway 1 { 70 4 0 y 20ol L 10 js 0 �. 10 oao r 0 m c m a o - - r Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Traffic Impact Study L: ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 Daily N® -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Southdale YMCA Expansion Figure 4a9 North No Scale is Circle NE fic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway �l 27 Traffic Impact Study s ack THE `TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY ,. Figure 401 2012 AM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volume YMCA Redevelopment - worth Edina, MN No Scale o L 40 X10 4 =30 i 30 y� i 0 0 0 20 r r Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE 0 o � o to P� 1, 60 40 ®N 20 = O o P 20 lot Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE ° IL so o L20 0 80 �l 10� 0� 0', N r9 ° 0 ° ° W 0 Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway O L 10 W N O 4.0 Apartment South Driveway 4J ,1 i r 10 MCA South Driveway «1 ,e► 50 j ■ Par ® Southdale YMCA Expansion Spack Iac SS11UDY COMPANY _ Figure 4011 2012 PM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Apartment South Driveway t 0 m 0 c m Q 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 29 Traffic Impact Study t c AHE IRAHIC STUDY COMPANY .. Figur6 2012 Saturday Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale CD L 20 C+wW. 20 000 M [O r�o v Traffic Circle NW 0 O N O N 10 I� 20 m••► \20 Traffic Circle SW o L 120 a°- Nom ��0 so 10j �4r ■ 9 f� 00-11 N 10 M% '^ Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Southdale YMCA Expansion r 0 0 rn m C C m a a 0 ri I 30 Traffic Circle NE 80 d I t* .10 =M10 M Traffic Circle SE C • Igo YMCA North Driveway C2 7J*1 [YMCA South Driveway J . S ca PTHE 7RArrIC 57VDY COMPANY Figure 4.13 2012 Daily Build Traffic Volumes er YMCA Redevelopment h Edina, MN No Scale fic Circle NE Mc Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway /TV Southdale YMCA Expansion 31 Traffic Impact Study 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2012 Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2012 study hours are shown in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4. It is assumed all of the lane configurations and traffic control are the same between the No -Build and Build scenarios. Table 5.1 No Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.6, 4.7 & 4.8. Table 5.2 Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D B/F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / A A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / D A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A/13 A / C A/13 York Ave S & NW traffic circle A/13 A / C A/13 York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. Table 5.2 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S _& Parklawn Ave A/ D C/ F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / B A/13 A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / E D / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A/13 A / C A/13 York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections will operate acceptably at LOS D or better in all of the study scenarios. Based on level of service analyses, there may be vehicle stacking issues at the North YMCA entrance and on Parklawn Avenue. Vehicle stacking at these two intersections is addressed in the next section. � Southdale YMCA Expansion 32 Traffic Impact Study Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2012 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in the No -Build and Build scenarios. Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, a four lane divided roadway such as York Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28,000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. A four lane undivided roadway such as Parklawn Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 15,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for LOS D on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in both the 2012 No- Build and Build scenarios. be Queuing Analysis Based on the Level of Service analyses above, the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections may have significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. To determine the length of the queues in the 2012 Build scenario, a more detailed traffic analysis was performed with a SimTrafficTM micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.4 were used with the p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10 and 4.11. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were transferred from SYNCHROT to SimTrafficTM The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 3 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 3 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. Table 5.3 shows a summary of the stacking results for the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections in the 2012 Build a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 4 Southdale YMCA Expansion 33 Traffic Impact Study IL Table 5.3 — 2012 Build Peak Flour Stacking Results Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffiem for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. x-61 Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 Traffic Impact Study York Ave /Parklawn Ave York Ave /North YMCA A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Left 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Thru 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) w Right 30 ft 170 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Left 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Thru 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Right 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Left 50 ft 50 ft 40 ft 40 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) 0 Thru Oft Oft Oft Oft (900 ft) (900 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) 0 Z Right Oft Oft Oft Oft (250 ft) (250 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) Left O ft 30 ft 60 ft 60 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) 3 .0 Thru Oft Oft Oft Oft (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) E 0 U) Right 20 ft 20 ft O ft O ft (225 ft) (225 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffiem for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. x-61 Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 Traffic Impact Study The Mn /DOT crash database was reviewed (with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool). From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008 there was one crash at the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection. It occurred on June 13, 2007 and was a rear end crash between two northbound vehicles. There is not a significant crash problem at the intersection that will be exacerbated by the expansion project. c. Traffic Control Needs Traffic signals or roundabouts should be installed at intersections when justified per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. None of the traffic volume warrants in the Manual will be met in the 2012 Build condition. In order to meet the Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3), the minor street would need to have 150 left turn volumes on one approach. None of the study intersections will meet this threshold. The westbound approach at the northern YMCA access will have 80 vehicles in the a.m. peak hour with little traffic growth after the redevelopment happens. The eastbound Parklawn Avenue approach to York Avenue will have 100 vehicles in the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour. If traffic grows in the study area, the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue may be a long term candidate to be controlled by a traffic signal or a roundabout. No new traffic control devices are required for the YMCA site redevelopment. The existing stop sign control for traffic leaving the site should be maintained with the redevelopment. d. Parking Analysis The maximum number of occupied parking spaces was 177 during the study period. The facility will be expanded by approximately 32% with the proposed addition. Increasing the peak parking demand by 32 %, results in the need for 234 parking stalls. Increasing the 234 stalls by 15% to account for additional membership growth, results in a maximum expected parking need of 269 stalls. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the peak parking demand. e. Transit Facilities There is a bus stop on York Avenue directly in front of the YMCA. Metro Transit routes 538, 539, and 578 serve the bus stop during the morning and evening rush hours. Downtown Minneapolis and the Mall of America are directly accessible via these routes. In addition, these routes stop at the Southdale Transit Center where transfers & i Southdale YMCA Expansion 35 Traffic Impact Study can be made to Metro Transit route 6, 114, 152, 515, 631, and 6.93. The YMCA site is well served by Metro Transit bus service. f Travel Demand Management Place Travel demand management plans work well in reducing trips back and forth between work and home via single occupant vehicles in the rush hours. The YMCA will make reasonable efforts to reduce these types of trips. The YMCA is directly served by Metro Transit via the bus stop adjacent to the site. The YMCA implements flexible work hours with the majority of its staff and volunteers working outside of the normal 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. work schedule. The YMCA is not a large enough employer at this location to fully implement other strategies such as structured carpooling or telecommuting. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, weekday p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue intersections are anticipated to be contained within existing storage lanes through the 2012 Build scenarios. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the anticipated peak parking demand of 269 vehicles. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. Based on the traffic analysis contained in this report, the following improvements are recommended: • Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. • Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. hG� Southdale YMCA Expansion 36 Traffic Impact Study • The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. • The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 7. Appendix a. Site Plan b. Traffic counts c. Parking capacity analysis d. Capacity analysis backup e. Queuing analysis backup Note — To reduce the size of the printed document, it was determined Appendices B through E (approximately 100 pages of technical data) should not be printed. They are available electronically from Jack Sullivan at the City of Edina. k -1 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 37 Traffic Impact Study A per ix _ Prelim` i om A k�jkt o �xg� �I of � H" t A ..: r----------- - - - - -, .. I, III i a a � o I �- G, e I 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iry 1� -41 µ ij c� a S� 0 a FFFFTOc O 1 0 0 0 I a 0 a 0 a 0 UIIIIIIIIII U. L) .011 1 ® Southdale YMCA Expansion Al Traffic Impact Study �1 =' s II II II I i I— i i iH ri i i'! J I / l g' of IL l \ J Sheet Title Proposed Site Plan I 1 Op I� •II 0 Bey, �le� t r Drawn Date Comm. No. Sheet No. MMS 10 Aug 2010 3.2010051.00 Project Lawson Commons 380 St Peter Street, Suite 600 Southdale YMCA Renovation Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 Voice: 651222.3701 �� B W B R Edina, Minnesota Fax: 651 777.8961 ARCHITECTS Copyright MR Architects n REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.1.2 From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action F-1 Discussion 11 Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Set Hearing (12 -21 -2010) for Planning Item: Final Development Plan, Bruce Carlson /Centennial Lakes/Whole Foods - 7401 France Avenue. ACTION REQUESTED: Set hearing date for December 21, 2010. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: See attached Planning Commission report. 49tN�,l'U o� e 0 rJ � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December 1, 2010 2010- 007.10a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Bruce Carlson, on behalf of the Centennial Lakes Plaza is requesting to tear down 35,331 square feet of retail space currently occupied by Storables and Thomasville Furniture to build a new 36,346 square foot Whole Foods grocery store. The property is located at 7401 France Avenue. (See location on pages Al —A5, and the narrative and plans on pages A6 —A20.) The request requires a Final Development Plan. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A six -story office building; zoned and guided mixed use. Easterly: Centennial Lakes Plaza retail space & Centennial Lakes Park; zoned and guided mixed use. Southerly: Centennial Lakes Plaza retail space; zoned and guided mixed use. Westerly: A two -story office building; zoned and guided office /residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 6.4 acres in size and contains retail buildings as part of the Centennial Lakes Plaza, and a two -level parking deck. The site is relatively flat. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Zoning: MDD -6, Mixed Development District Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for mixed use, which allows retail uses. The proposed grocery store is a permitted use within the MDD -6 zoning district, which this property is zoned. The new building would be located in the same general footprint of the existing retail building. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; A Preliminary Development Plan is only required for a property requested to be rezoned. No rezoning is requested. The plan is consistent with the previously approved Overall Development Plan for the site, which included the existing retail building. (See Overall Development Plan on page A5.) c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The single -story grocery store would be consistent with the existing single - story retail building, and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use; The new 36,346 square foot grocery store would be slightly larger than the existing 35,331 square foot retail building. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; Yes. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study and staff report on pages A23 —A76.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 18, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See the minutes on pages A21 a —A21 b.) f) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and 2 As demonstrated in the compliance table on page 4, the proposal conforms to all Zoning Ordinance requirements. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading, drainage and utility plans and has provided comment on page A21. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site, as there are no off -site pond expansions available. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking Based on the square footage of the existing retail space within the entire Centennial Lakes Plaza development, and the proposed increase in square footage for Whole Foods, 695 parking stalls are required. The existing site provides 899 parking stalls. The revised site plan would provide 901 parking stalls, therefore, the parking requirements would continue to be met. Site Circulation Access to the site, and site circulation would remain the same. (See pages A14 —A15.) The only change to the site is the location of the loading facilities. Loading The proposed plans would relocate the loading area on the site from the front of the building along France Avenue, to the east side of the building along Parklawn Avenue. (See existing and proposed locations on pages Al4 —A15.) The loading area would be screened from Parklawn with a brick wall that would match the building. (See page Al2.) Additional landscaping is also proposed along Parklawn to screen the loading area from the Parklawn and adjacent property. (See Page Al 6.) Specific plans showing truck turning movements were submitted on November 23rd. (See pages A77 —A79.) The city engineer will review these plans and provide comment for the Planning Commission on December 1st k] Building Design The building would be built of brick and stone. (See pages A11 —A13.) The entrance to the store would face the south, generally in the same location as the previous store. Landscaping The landscape plan has been designed to match the previously approved plan, which was part of an overall plan contemplated for the site. (See page A5.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 87 overstory trees are required. That includes the entire Centennial Lakes Plaza site. There would be 140 existing and proposed overstory trees with the tear down and rebuild of Whole Foods. Forty -nine (49) trees would be removed, and 50 trees replanted. (See landscape plan on page A16.) A full complement of understory trees would be planted around the building. Compliance Table al City Standard Proposed Front — France 35 feet 35 feet Side Street — Parklawn 35 feet 35 feet Side — South 20 200+ feet Rear — East 35 200+ feet Building Height 4 stories or 1 stories and 28 feet 50 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 13% Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 20 feet (existing) setback Loading Dock 35 feet 35 feet Parking Stalls 695 (overall site) 901 (existing & proposed) Overstory Trees 87 required 140 (50 new trees and (number is based on the 90 existing) perimeter of the entire development site) al Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the MDD -6 District. 2. The plans are consistent with the Overall Development Plans for the site. The new Whole Foods store would be located in the same general footprint as the existing retail space. Circulation patterns on the site would remain. 3. The proposal meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements; therefore, the applicant is entitled the proposed use. e Would the existing roadways support the project? Yes. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study and staff report pages A23 —A77.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 18, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A21 a— A21 b.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan at 7401 France for a new Whole Foods Store. Approval is based on the following. findings: The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following-plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. .Deadline for a city decision: February 15, 2011 C1 City of Edina ' - t ►" '14 4.11 - - •.. "S. Iota "c ivl� Etx� z" Its • uwyY r 4 { r012 1YU 6087 )1I u Y 1010 105 ��• 707 1 .1105 GO 707 F 1 , 1 • _ r', t ' 11. 60S (00 . - 101 1 '4 1 Y.3� • j 91S 114 T ,.!• � - F17 011 313 00 �lj.�T:�� �'✓ > 004 907 101 317 qo3 402 r 3 I l�T NfA: 901 -W 303 rw,y -r "tea 24 111 711 100 103 377 • -1 7777 313 I low (4 't Ir - : 'f .�^ "i •�./ .� ;.Yioi fo1 Jog 4 i 0 701 n *- -,` . , , r•�,wus cm. 7500 t I• lskp # a � .OLsr�+s�s��ex�ueea1r�• .. r,(ene.e��.�: r4n° Q ,Q d PID:3202824320399 7401 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 Az = Y i � C - W77 1• ., -01; U) Legend He... Number Label. Street Name L.W. City Limit. Creok. Lake Names Lek- Park. Parcel. 2009 Aerial Photo City of Edina 0 710971w �1 r- -7101— I r10fl�f 7101 3630 Legend 7113,712 it3�7f05 -71W 1000 71 17105 I M.— Number labels 71177116 f }7 1l. 71217120 JJ17' Street Name labels f21�7.11 7123712/ 12S 71/ 6 7117,71 If 1 JH3 City Limits - - 712! 7125 }24,7120 71217120 7121 7120 7 3301 t) f �\/ .7 ;1337112 13311211 7125712. �11257124 Creeks t /3)7130 1�rIJ'9171 -7 2. 1247179 Lake Names 10/7200 720172001 r2Ol7200 72017100 7201,203 lakes 710; ".?21W 72057201 51037104 7105 7200 [ Parts 7M9 );09720! 720 11097207 100 7709 ITOt zoning 7117 72/37272 7111 72177215 215 ]150 275 7170 ® APO (AUI. —h. Ps+c,.e O:: rtil 7171 7)DO 71217320 1719 7210 7225722; O MDD•11M.m4Dew]..— D.—I 7121 73017300 7301 1310 7300 4 I f IlJ! 74 Pus . MOO S(Mw Ow ' —' 0. -11 738 77057701 ,1707 f01lt1! f0 I �url�mw,n ■ MDD OIMmq Dawwamnn' Dan71 7i0e 7709730%7309 0 ]12731]1312 7111 14 7411 60! 703 ■ PC0 -1 tPWwad camnw.mlOSlral 1316 T3/777/fi 1313 7777 7710 73217320 7,19 1770 1001 '11 I6 0 901 319 7355 PC0.21P1anrw C nor Dm.. /0311 7380 10111 - D00 100 513 901 ■ /GO.3(Mwd Gamew°MOmnnl 7377 7326733!73397313 501 PCO pu icalnmer.lOmnal 101 7370 7390 1 7373 If74 1 11 `M 13 71017100 a P10I►t>a.s0 `,4u—Dalnctl 7103 1790 3150 1700 0 4000 .300 71W 10410770] 3400 400 n 7405740 30;7. 7/09,40; P'00-11Haua4ONim Ona.��l 7413 741 POO- 21PI.u.e ONsoelrnl 125f Of 1 114X ■ PRO- 11Plw444Ru+>3e 40-1 Ttw 7!D} 0 1 742974 ■ PRO-21PWn Rw WOb .125 111 0 3955 :,�r D 7/3371 , ■ PRO SIP-- R—nl.tl Osvnl : 1413 !w0 0 N . PRO 1PI .. Rxi]mh/ Obinstl 133 1199 I . PRO 5IP-- RTl—WOUVn1 156 c 0 0 lwi 511 ■ PsR -1lP —Sawn O.'rj !!50 INI J7U0 1100 JSSO S1e � p.lisnar Dw6�n4 Unsi W 36 1157 1000 0 520 ■ R -21 Daukb O—MI, U.AJ 71 600 3105 O RNOIRe9 ronr Nae 7eO Wrtl 0 7109 J6U4� ❑ Parcels 7525 N51 1608 4115 7000 7605 10f 761 "Of 0 7616 1665 O 1701 7610 T 0 162! ;775 1114 ral V = 7637 0 11 050 7JW n08 21 .700 y 0 7100 {0 08 N45 JJ25 7701 3600 300 v15 Cmw 4<<.'•S6G52115 e'E11 PID: 3202824320399 7401 France Ave S I Y. 1CYI, Q Edina, MN 55435 ' lnChJik5 l X, ` y �I ID b _ -_ - - -- _ -_ -- '. . - �- re.ul A I.•11 Fr tia 0 „Iii •, i \ Div � � � • • u� �i! -�' �•4ti 1 -• � it � �•�y , � 1� •.� Q• � is _- _Ira /� r » 1 AS � J 8 ••11 f. ..� A 11 o a, SITE PLAN APPLICANT'S WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUEST FOR NEW WHOLE FOODS AT CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA The owner's of Centennial Lakes Plaza at 7401 France Avenue propose to demolish the existing 34,939 square foot building leased by Storables and Thomasville Furniture and construct a custom - built, freestanding, 32,340 square foot building in its place to accommodate a new Whole Foods grocery store. The new Whole Foods building incorporates and compliments existing architecture and proposes new updated landscaping and a new parking surface. The Applicant requests The City of Edina to approve the Application noting that the lease with Storables expires on February 28, 2011 and the tenant has advised landlord of its intent to vacate. Thomasville Furniture has provided the landlord with an option to terminate their lease, effective February 28, 2011. The owner has negotiated and entered into a fully executed new lease with Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. to replace these two vacant spaces. After many space planning sessions, it has been determined that Whole Foods is not able to operate in the existing facility, therefore, it is necessary to replace the existing structure with a new freestanding building. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is the nation's leading natural and organic grocer with over 270 stores in both the US and UK. The first Whole Foods opened in Austin, TX in 1980. Whole Foods will be a great addition to the Edina retail community. The owner of Centennial Lakes Plaza is Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company. TA Associates Realty manages Centennial Lakes Plaza and was established in 1982, and currently is one of the largest and most experienced privately held real estate advisors in the United States. TA Associates Realty is a financially stable landlord with a long -term real estate investment perspective. Current assets under management total approximately 85 million square feet of commercial real estate and 8,000 residential units located in over 35 markets nationwide. The project coordinator for the development is Bruce Carlson of Mid - America Real Estate. Prior to joining Mid - America in June 2010, Mr. Carlson developed 6 grocery anchored shopping centers over an 11 year period with United Properties of Bloomington as Vice President of Retail Development. Mid - America Real Estate is the leading full- service retail real estate organization in the mid -west with offices in Chicago, Milwaukee and Minneapolis. The project architect is Kathy Anderson of Architectural Consortium. Kathy was part of the original design team for Centennial Lakes and has over 25 years of retail design experience with numerous awards and distinctions. Notable projects include the Whole Foods development at Calhoun Commons, Arbor Lakes in Maple Grove, and Silver Lake Village in St. Anthony, The project civil engineer is Westwood Professional Engineers. Their project team includes members who were part of the original design of Centennial Lakes. Westwood was founded in 1972 in Minnesota and is one of Minnesota's leading civil engineering firms. PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCT 2 9 2010 A CITY OF EDINA Cary Teague From: Bruce D. Carlson <BCarlson @midamericagrp.com> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 1:08 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Michael Sweatt (MW MWQ Michael Bashaw (MW MWC); 'Bianca Tabourn'; Doug Sailor, 'Beth Holmgren'; 'Kathy Anderson'; 'Dan Parks' Subject: Whole Foods Truck Deliveries Hi Cary, See below from Dan Blackburn, Store Manager /Team Leader at Whole Foods. As you can see, deliveries for Whole Foods are off peak. Large deliveries will have little or no impact on customers or traffic at Centennial Lakes Plaza. Whole Foods' focus is on customer service of course. It does not serve Whole Foods well to take deliveries during busy times. Please relay this information to Staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. Thank you Cary! Bruce D. Carlson I Project Director M, MID: �.AME,RIC,A 5353 Wayzata Boulevard - Suite 650 - Minneapolis, MN 55416 DIRECT: 952 -563 -6674 1 Cell: 612 - 386 -8544 1 FAX: 952 - 563 -6633 bcarlson(a)midamericagrp.com Our Newsletter From: Dan Blackburn (MW CHN) [mailto:Dan.Blackburn @wholefoods.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:48 PM To: Michael Sweatt (MW MWQ Bruce D. Carlson Cc: Michael Bashaw (MW MWQ Subject: RE: Edina Traffic Commision proposal by Whole Foods Hello, I don't have the latest truck pattern movement. However, 1 think it's important to note that most big deliveries (requiring 53' trailers and possibly a sleeper) will be arriving before 6AM. We can expect to see one or two of these daily. I don't think there are any restriction on the delivery times (if so, I'd like to know). After that is smaller independent, local and /or direct service vendors and they usually arrive in smaller bobtails or mid -size delivery trucks. They include UPS, Fed -Ex, bread vendors etc. All receiving is typically done before 1:00 PM. Daniel J. Blackburn Store Team Leader Lake Calhoun 612- 927 -8141 (fax)612- 929 -0616 A6�� =fi=- a ��y f�.R ,P"�.�a« z. m zc �+ r 't� 1 `IL OL liq • � • y 4 4 r r ...wy Y J'w Ivry Y+ , ARCHITECTU! CONSORTIUM i 901 North 3rd Slreel 61. Minneapolls, MN 55401 Fax 61'. SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION FACING FRANCE AVE w PREPARED FOR: CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA, LLC MID AMERICA - REAL ESTATE WHOLE FOODS EXTERIOR RENDERING 161^x' rx 'A364030 IE92 -9960 5353 WAYZATA BLVD., SUITE 650 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 EDINA, MN SCALE: AS NOTED Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 �'cb.- N NORTH ELEVATION FACING PARKLAWN AVE. EAST ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL PREPARED FOR: WHOLE FOODS EXTERIOR RENDERING CONSORTIUM L.L.C. AMERICA LAKES EAL ESTATE BLVD.. SUITE 901 North 3rd Street 812 -43&4030 MINNEAPOLISA N 55416 sso SCALE: AS NOTED Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 6124)924KO EDINA, MN 1P , A 3.2 Archilecluml Consortium, LLC. 2010 t�I SOUTH ELEVATION wuiwrowno�NnEOO_�_... occaume riur.�waw -xr. �ccsn•r eu�o 2 WEST _ELEVATION LE EVATIION ewcK�DwnnDS rriwwwN ��� I PREF —HED Mn - SCAEENWALLA �l 2-1912 121152 __ -- 9 d� VERY R]CIVgYEFA BYAI ttEl �A,a .----- .— _____— _— _______ LOGTpM Ytl NL PAIITE!E va s 9 .m 9 NORIHrw A"e� eE�DrEi PNEFWI9HED MrL ",,, PR�F.,=��w DP. EEO. A.- 1 PRERNIEI1EO Nrt BRIGf -LICM ADDEM sM,o� HITECTURAL PO RP FOR: EU 1 CENTENNIAL LADS p— LL. 3ORTIUM L. L.C. MID AMERIU - REAL ESTATE BVePI d12- 6,,0]0 5153 WAY ATA BLVD., SMITE 850 ._._ ._. _ NINNEAPOLLR, MN 55418 WHOLE FOODS EDINA. MINNESOTA ;- ijL-JZr.L DOCN- - -- —i-°= - - ---------- - - - - -� PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: AS NOTED 4� A 1.1 Amhll.cluml ConwNum, L.L.C. 7010 )ad Profuoiwd SavicM I- i v 1 U Z! I I G 7�1 FrE -M. 1. Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ Mid-Am 6355 W"." B-k..4 sum. M Ali VIM CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA LLC 7401 FRANCE AVE. S. EDINA, UN 55435 TOTAL BUILDINC ii G. AREA=35,JJI SF 9KNE' ,,rrr CAR GE DOOR rFf -946.88, it t G T. C 'dL % eTa LOT A---T fj1D NO. 3R-028- 4 -3 -0399 % ....... 40 ....... W . j 13 6 sppcEs '2 -IPAC�S i U SPACES 1w .. a 510.00 vs NVS NrS P WS N89'IW59"E 12 ACEI A 66 0 LO 2 t • PID NO. 32 -028 24 -32 040Q p sp" Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ Mid-Am 6355 W"." B-k..4 sum. M Ali VIM no Wmnawd Prof"Zimci Sw%icm bw- -n Z 0 m m Z c m U) 0 c PARKLAWN AVENUE ........... ............ 1� uo WHOLE FOODS MARKET 32,340 SF FF 846.0 I LGAONG D00C FF Sn2 ino % • 4 2 C M21 Ell I ENSTM BLMDINQ FrE-0�55 16 Is 1) ENSnNG-\ I�m 5 am 'u A STM BOUARDS To RWAN ....... ... I mdmL f- Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ AM-, mm W"=" B-I." S.M. vend mm Ai 5- .....Pm An-t. % 010 Westwood Professional Services, Inc- KEEP TREES REMOVE N40UIRE NTTH L.YTY AND JUMPERS REPLACE MTTII ENTRY PLANDNG AaACENT PROPERTY BOULDERS. LITRE BLUE BOULDERS RED FLAME STEM GRASS, KARL GINNER ABOUT MATCNMM. FOETiSTEIP GRASSY {TEiCA GR� AUTUMN JOr VARO PLANTINGS DE ORO DA VU AND p,l y ,� C. AUTUMN JOY - SF Dcu G �i 1LQfdL �• . - , ., " .:'' S- TREES AND KA Y:....... ..... ... .. .: _. g'" .>sr FOERSTER * ' ASS / ;. .........._'q,x o• ..: REM01E SPRUCE TREES ... BLOCxuvc sTav MOMAIEWT SIGI�t t REPLACE LMT1/ 7EOIIVY KEEP PLANTINGS PARKLAWN AVENUE , ; ARBORWTAE — - __ -- .S .t_... ..... _ ....... Fj .. \ PUNOMGSt ,I - •.- � • � �� �� .:. REMOVE SHRUBS ADD LRAM REDS FLAME . t FOERSIER GRASS .. tSE3 BUlLaW NORTH AND NEST.• .°sa , 91 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE MOTE a e,, SERE BWCK EVENCREEN TREES TECNNY ARBORWIAE, COMPACT AMUR MAPLE DWARF KOREAN � LILAC, AND RED FLACK GRASS >' . NNHOLE FOODS MARKET ., 32.340 SF FF 890.0 ►. BIJILOMC Sal AND EAST• ` ,• i . 'c ,{�'" ,�: n kk''. y CONCRETE PLANTERS MTN r •. ti ai � ! ANNUALS D 3 wm s •:' 1 Z PLANTERS BELOW! C !: ` i 1 KEEP TENS ADD m - ; COBBLESTONES. TAUTO N Ln ••REND -,,. :.YEN; ANp MIIW/ALS P o CGIBBLLSTQNES. 'LTDLLDERS.'. AND KARL. f'GIEltSTER GRASS P 9 V NO PER FRANCE IVAMN AR4 E _. IMIG PAS, FRANCE RAC ZI CRABS •,`';- �';., '' TREES. LINDEN TREES. ADD RS7E* CRASS RCM -. o : o TO E7LL' IN, CAPS •LVN SLOPE .'. STAIR PLANTER UMN.u10Y SEDLA( - KEEP COBBLESTONES AND J 57ET.LA OE GIRO ALB IN i ., STELLA LIE ORO OAnJLY rA l AD DE aw E CRABS COBBLESTONE; rrr STELLA DE KARL FOERS AND ST:2 O DA KAY CRA . Y% Tsa .. - .. , .. _ KEEP ALL PL NJIN= :., . `._•.....:,.. _.. •- ;,...�.._: .. ....,:, :....:.. .... -:... ADD CRABSA�MIS9NG. •, .. v MONUMENT SIGN KE LOG DONS ..ADD' BULDERS AND KARL KEEP PLANYINGSL . ADD 7ECHNY . - ..,...,v_._...,.. ....... ,.,,....,>.....:.. ..._ „. _,. „' -- .:: ..... .:<. _.. ' ARBORNlAG _ � �� � �� ��� FOERSTER GRASS IY BOUIEVARD ri 3` .... ENTRY 90E5: REMOVE ENTRY 9DES BEHOVE '. EYEREiiCEN TREES AND - YE'?GREEW 5A1R PLANTER, • ,, z ALL SiR7l/bS ADD ... rr ., �:� ALL SHRUBS ADDAX .. roBBtES ' ;.., . ;'_... BOLR.DE85. COBBLESTONE o o ,+ STEf.LA�OE S DA nA r N AND .... PINK SOW ZABS KARL` 3 �.. FOERSTERI CRASS SCANDIA .._ .. AAWIPER- 57ELLA DE GIRO... -... .. DA nA Y....AND AUTUMN.. JOY...... E. € 3 \ s ..... }.... - .. gDI,p1 :.... SHRUBS ADD PROP. a. : SPlRE CRABS .....- EXISTING T N7CNBFAN FLEECFfLOMER SHRUBS TO r . '.,._TO REMAW a ....... "f[L. IN GAPS �' ..._ BEDS AT PARKWC •t / STRUCIUim FRANCE QiXiFVARD:J .. PARKMC I iRUII' I .. MO IRRK:+1770V PEA...... .. REMOVE SHRUBS :�ADD'�.'.::'� KEEP CRAB TREES .... PAST smut WAL ... :' .-' 406BLESTAVE$ MODIFY WAof BED '. - DAMAGE - AND KARL FOERSTER G#ASS.: ... TO SOUARE ....... . ^ d > p Fg. ......... KEEP YE`W% ADD : .. o' ° PLANTERS BECOME �”" - • o p~ ^ -� .. CDBBLESTCWES ' CORAESTOW.%% AUT'aV f YEN; AND ANNUALS 4l. REMOVE SHRUBS ADD //71 - BOULDERS RED FUME CRASS AND KARL FOERSTER CRASS 8 BUILDING BUFFERING KEEP SPRUCE TREES ADD'. -.. Bomaws. CCTLfPACT ANUR, - r EVEkRKEN TEOVNY AROWWrAE DWARF _ ]BEES KOREAN LAAC, RED FLAME ENTRY ISLAND CRASS. KARL FOERVER CRASS. KEEP TREES REMOVE 1.. \ STELLA of ORo DAYLAr AND SHRUBS ADD RED FLAME/ ,A y GRAS% KARL FOERSTER . \. GR AUTUMN JOY cLo ♦.. O. JGIr sEVUM. ofg. o� G AND A DE GIRD DAnAy "= -O. AND ANNU LS - : .:. .... • '.... x f °PLA NTIN GA� BU R OL�5aRU5 UD BOLA RD R � ! I•1010 R1111M10 PnRNOS1oRd Su"Im Irl AEEP , AIM 1 I �TE z FIT D Z m On Os Y A" AAPLL ORG/LF KOREAA LILAC AND RED FLAW CHAS WHOLE FOODS MARKET N 51,5w0 SF FF B1Ba V C 9E a M E NM OTT' AND a1uDtR� lU ADAAmI7 FRGPfR7r S1ELI OR.15 .• � DIALER AD01/r IIATCTLILC FOERSnw I AND ARD MANiRI(S DE ORD DA S Au RAN A a •PARIQAWNAVENUE "• A" AAPLL ORG/LF KOREAA LILAC AND RED FLAW CHAS WHOLE FOODS MARKET N 51,5w0 SF FF B1Ba V C 9E a M E BDEED'ERS RED nAmr lU aRASS AU -0Y SEDNAL r wo .• � anar Ats" AND S 1 CRASS O1A55 9 BLOCK Sm RPfIS REPLACE SIN REPLACE 7LOINr " `•, ARBOPNTAC E 1 RENo �T D . L10nEL5rWCS'BOKDERS' .; AND RAIPL TRpSRX aA55 KEEP CRABS AND 11 . SNRV21 ADD.n.ErcEFLORUI SFRXKBS' TD RL N, T'AP$; OM gain 1 AUTTAN wr SEDIALL -• - . •. SmAA LE O70 OAnAr AAD 57C1LA Of OYO • .: . SETLA LA MIMMAt CRABS DE ABgADER� AND O OA1TAr KARL FgFRSIfNA OlA LJ7 LOVER PAW MIRY!: . KEEP ALL P1AqWh= . K ,ROSES ALe CRABS #1 MESSIRC .. L MONAMr SIX KEEP PEAVT1N . BELERS MID KARL ; _ . ADD 2 Y RN ... BOERSIERD ppyyKN _ TLERSTFR CRASS N RELIOK 1 ufort.22 RES AAD .. EN.AOEM TREES AND •.. STAR PIANTri ALL S/A49S ADD - 4 AL 91MIBS ADD COBBLESTONES AND e •i� � R1BL :: BOT/LDCRS ...' • , READ niO4AQ \ s DE ORp MnaY ._ .. POK SPOW CRABS KARL. • - ` T. �llYll PQRSEEIRGPASS sGIAdA AAjL r,.. 5TQLA DE CRIB .. •..: L I 1 .. SmW.. AND AU71AN-JOF -.. 3ORD NE ,` .. ..._ KCLA CRABS ,11X7 FO.: SPAS CRABS AND :.. .... LTIT57RYC Y 140I BEAN ���� � � :: nEEELFL011FR 9NIB5� 1` - : - ! .W /RYAN s " -.P•EL "CAPS / PI NQ tldNf.1 TAY PER " gEYDK 9Y7IB5 ADO ' KFEP 1 PAST STRUCFURAL OOB9f5RWES BDEXaELjS! MOD" 107LOI ETD DAh1W . AAD RA/X. FE ISIEIl CRASS. , M SOUARE \�- COBRC' ES a` � �.. RI:TF% at Nr laws / c ®LES�iGK�T TAU rwP YM AND AN4/ 1 ;1 DMIDEA'S RED PULE _ ..,A i R;. 'ryFU rBASS ARD KARL _ �1 j(_o�1uy IOERSIER CRASS j Bp.. KEEP BOULDERS ce TREES, MUR �CTI BOTXDE A COIWACT AWOL 1 " fFONr ARBORNLI[ ORNRF " RO9EAN LLAC AM FLAME MTRY ISlAADS O `�1y CRASS, KARL PLCNSIETP CRASS KEEP iAEEY REWK / . STELLA BE aRQ rlAnar AND / SIdAIHS ACID RED nALRq �•.. ., sURAN AY 5EDUM �q CRASS KARL PDERS/ER . ♦. CRASS, AUTUMN ADY L p gjr ,Aa.l E sFE1t DA na _ANAA VeuIDN4 3 P m.• REYOK 5701Lffi ADD LAMF •- .,., :'•.,. A•$ KALE .. .. .. REPLACE RIM r AGO "E.113"r .,..,._.,.`._..w.m,..........._ o w TAE 70TH 'S EET' - t L " NQIRRE NM Orr ABOUr . 7B7N BOAEYARR _ MAIMING RORLYAA /EYOK SIMECTIK IFEES nANRY45 N 1IEDIAN REEF REST. /ELIOK A#WVM REPLACE! RIM BOPXDERS urw BLLE - S/EY RASS KARL - - I Z;a'r' Z; DOLILMMM NATO AURAN AY SLD1.V. SEVEN SM A DE OW _,.. OAKAr. AND ANWJALS �-- YMCMMaOd 70P19/D R� TS• 15170 Landsoaps Notes 1. LasY ALL LANDSCAPE WRON L ALL OSTIRBm L/AIDYAPm AR sEmED. YlnrF SPORIAT1HOAR Oixm RE TRAx01 STANDARD LOUT SEDRUG YA✓"' Sm O WEE"S GRASS IAL OR, q CO POTENTIAL [m OR 1 CONTRACTOR ITS AROSITECI IF 6N TK AENCAN OR 1 IEINAODL AND , iC AS 1 A. PROWDE A YODYIN OF C TOPS Am SOL AIENDUENIM FOR W1 SNAL HAW A SIINRIOWT CRO 5. ALL RANTWO ®R TO E WAI M.S. fl WEDGED MADWOOD W.C. 9 EQUAL. AND AT A MUM 1' L T. ROC! COBBLESTONES TO E A I V' TO 12' OWnTER AND ANOI C G.TM IAYESTONC(TAN) APPRO ANaORm ON TOP OF GROUND ,OR TO DELIM .. S. 9.4E TREE AND SIR UB PLINI O NJICM RIND AR EACN BAS DIANETER RING, EKROEEN PLA L C.$TWo TREES AO sWM9, R DEAD OR UNDES••Nar LA®5 A COKRLTFO BY A QUALIFIED Nm K2TATION AID DWM Or R 10. CONTRACTOR TO WATER MAT I ESTANL9OpR PERM. IRS= ESIABLL9WCNT AID NOW AL 6 5 FULLY OPERATIONAL 11. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY Y N[\ LCOIMETION AND OWNS AGO IL PROPERTY SN11LL -W AI/T ANA' AREAS TO E WhChI A EAS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APP TK nRSr CPEN1nOMA SEASON N PRiGTION SHALL MYE TWO-YE NSTALATION APROM BY ON ROB, mARO TTp1, w SENSC ACCESSORN SPRAYS AND O1KR SYSIELL 11 LANDSCAPE AND IRR1GnO1 YAI 11 Co. CR[lE RANTER TO E APR PAIN. [HONG. Leadsoape Data TOONC YDO- OWRSTOAY TREE I IRE NEOuIREIENTS: OVERSTOR TIES CACLLA710C 3445 UNOCISTORT TAU IN AO AND SNRNB: I— Y AU.,TREE SIZE IBEF_ FOR 2". BLOC NT.: OWA COW \CClL VIVA u TREE ROOT AND SPE, BALL Si TRA9 PARR DWNO TIME CREOT: EtST DFCSE OUSTING TRLE SNOWRI ERSR SAM RENO, TREES PROUDER: TOTAL PROW 1.6IldtOap0 lAd-d EnSnNO ER TO RFAIAEUR W 0 1 o i Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC _d Professimd Swmcm 'm 44f `i Amll DUSTING BUMD94C FFE-854-55 Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ bfid Am MS3 W.Y." 5.1-4 Sft dw D�d amg�=-- tll 7 7�. . ... ......... . Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ bfid Am MS3 W.Y." 5.1-4 Sft dw D�d amg�=-- tll -if Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ bfid Am MS3 W.Y." 5.1-4 Sft dw D�d amg�=-- swv6cm 11,- % .... . .... . ...... op . ... ....... ... --52 C P", r- SAN ................ . FIEUDVASANDON E105n SERMCES or Pi a42.20 SAN UN-3 121 STEEL CASING pre FOR POSSME ,UIRE WATE101AN SERMCE . lk YPUDNCCH ORMN-54 LOAONG AA, FF 95Z2 IE- (SEE MD) DOCK 5- PLUG CREASE YRAP ce M,-5w3 !! D \. k co-as WHOLE FOODS MARKET 32,340 SF 1A FF 846.0 CS MM-58 % FDC ST �51111 It 91 LANDER R"F: SEE DEFAL tz 11 MCC VdIrr Do 98ZT tr TECYIDN F;, ET I !!,A� DL CEP J... LLU th . ............. .. ..... .. ... lister ..r '3 71,0774 11 W5 - . ..... . .... , �dl • .... .. .... . .. PR Ec Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ Mid-America Rea P, Sm w..y"w. w ftw ft% & V k 1� hmh—w. us" OFFICE AREA I +/- 3.352 SF I , � I II —_ _— _— _- _--- _- _ —_ —_ -- — _— _— _.y —_ —_ —_ 2 BlsICRiEl1MMARYME7LWwERAORRAN I STORAGE +/ -7,020 SF ---------- 11 1 ---- ------------ ------------ 1 i ,L_____- _ -___- , PREP.AREA - — L d I , � 1 ------ ------ 'I PREP.AREA ' I +/- 20,000 SF 1 i I +/.1,718 SF I , , I 1 J- I `1 1 1 I WH LE FOODS MA KET ' I 33,340 SF I 1 2W-Cr DINNING AR I I - +/ -1,441 SF I -_J I F I Q PRELMwARY MAM FLODR RAN vu-.rs' ARCHITECTURAL Fo` R'�D WHOLE FOODS PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN CONSORTIUM L.L.C. MIDAM PXA-R ALE AT LLD MID AMERIG -REAL ESTRTE /� e� 8:157 WA77/1TA BLVD. BORE 6W SCALE: AS NOTED A 2. 9D1NOnnmsu.el siz- +as+mo MMEAVaLV,sa5s4is EDINA, MINNESOTA MNne�a81, MN 58107 Fs 812492 -BBW AId4leduld CwmAum, LLC.2010 4,9tN /A,l�lr y MEMORANDUM - Plan Review °• -�� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: November 19, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Centennial Lakes Plaza — Whole Foods 7401 France Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and draft minutes. O A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required. O All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet — Cl: 1. Provide landscape islands at the ends of the two outer parking trees. 2. Provide a five -foot boulevard style sidewalk along France Avenue from the existing sidewalk to the main entrance of Centennial Lakes Plaza. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEngineering \General\F Streets \7401 n 7501 Centennial Lakes Plaza \Whole Foods\20101119 review of 7401 France Avenue South Whole Foods.docx AaI As ' tant city engineer Sullivan said staff will be reporting to the Council and t TC in late Dece er regarding this topic and also including information on what is ha Wing in St. Louis Park with heir rail line. VI. New Buse ss a. Richfield ffic Control Request City of Richfield's city a eer Jeff Pearson, said t city of Richfield is requesting permission to install stop signs at 75 Jeff and York T ace & Xerxes because of the new bike lanes and also because of their new sign pol' that calls for stop signs on north /south avenues. Mr. Sullivan explained that the req st s first presented to the Traffic Safety Committee but was denied for lack of warrants Council asked that the ETC review and make a recommendation. During discussion, staff as asked if this was a ood idea "and Mr.- Sullivan said considering their stop sign polic , he bike lanes and trail syst ,;;.that this would � be, a positive measure. Commissioner S roeder noted that the stop sign po,' has no accommodation for bicycles and pedestria and should be adjusted to includ" them. 1. Commi loner Nelson motioned to approve the 'request as: pr ented by the city of Richfield an was seconded by Commissioner White. b. Whole Foods Transportation Study. , Assistant city engineer Sullivan said developers :are proposi rig, to tear down the 35,000 sq. ft. building at 7401 France Avenue and replace it: with'.a..32,00&!,Nq ..ft. building with similar foot prints to house Whole Foods,.a grocery store. Mr. Sullivan said the ..traffiiic study' objectives Wdre to 1) document traffic operations under existing operating conditions; 2) assess future41'affic conditions if the project does not proceed; 3) analyze future operations if the redevelopment proceeds as planned; and 4) assess the impact of the redevelopment and recommend mitigation measures if needed; and they were asked to look at the following, intersections: 'France Avenue at Parklawn, Plaza Drive, and 76th Street; Parklawn Avenue at. Centennial Lakes; 76th Street at Centennial Lakes; and two Plaza Drive interrial''intersections. Mr. Sullivan said the studyanalysis.,shows the following: reconstruction will add 2100 daily trips with 145 trips in the PM `peak hour'and 133 in the Saturday peak hour; intersections will operate at:,acceptable level'of service C or better; however, some measurements are at E; access locations to remain'.the same; and no improvements to the local street network are recommended: Additionally, he said a new sidewalk with a crosswalk and bike racks are included in the project a:nd,.that the store is along Metro Transit's route 6 bus line. Mr. Sullivan said staff recommends approval and asked that the ETC "adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for Whole foods — Centennial Lakes does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Discussion ensued and Commissioner Nelson asked if the construction to the north was taken into consideration. Mr. Sullivan said yes, and that the developers' traffic consultant was given a computerized base model to use to do their traffic study. 2 AiIti Commissioner Bonneville noted that the access on Plaza Drive that connects the adjoining parking lots is below grade and unsafe. He suggested stop signs to make it safer. Mr. Sullivan said site circulation will be reviewed by City Engineer Houle and the Planning Commission. Commissioner Bonneville also said he believes vehicles will stack on Parklawn Avenue. Nick Erpelding with Westwood Professional Services, said majority of traffic is expected to access from Parklawn Avenue and they reviewed cueing on Parklawn and found no adverse effects from vehicles passing through the intersection. Commissioner Janovy said she is concerned that the north entrance. will be used by delivery trucks and customers and asked if there will be a conflict. Mr:, Bruce Carlson, development director with Mid - America Real Estate, said they have gone over truck movements many times and feel that they have a good design. He said most deliveries,*i ill` be in the mornings and will be minimal at 4 -5 per day. Commissioner Bonneville said the nose of the center median on ParklawnAvenue will need to be cut back for trucks to make left turns. -Mr. Sullivan said staff questioned this'earlier on but all of the templates that they've looked at shows - trucks will be;: able to maneuver, around the median and the issue can be revisited if needed. Commissioner Schroeder asked if they. _took into account: the number of drivers going south who may leave to the north thereby` creating more traffic' *on Parklawn Avenue instead of W. 76th Street. Mr. Erpelding said they did,take,this into account: and they did factor in most of the traffic exiting via Parklawn Avenue. Commissioner Bonneville inquired. about parking. ratio and, Mr: Sullivan said parking review will be looked at by the Planning Commission Commissioner Schroeder motioned,;;' "that the`araffic as demonstrated in the [traffic impact analysis] for Whole ':Foods — Cenntenial Lakes:,.�does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." The motion was seconded; by Commissioner Nelson. Aye: Schroeder; White, Janovy; Nelson, Workinger 1 Nay: Bonneville Motion;carried. C. lete Street Jack Broz` Mr. Sullivan in uced Jack. Broz with Howard R. Green. He said Mr. represents one of many companies. th have. been working on developing Comple reets which is now state statute and that* after e City Engineers Association of innesota winter conference in January, staff will have som ing more defined to pres Mr. Broz said he is a transportatio ngine nd most recently he has been participating in the MN Complete Streets Coalition, an isory group formed by Mn /DOT. Mr. Broz showed a video that was taped on Market S et, Sa rancisco, in 1906, showing cars, trains, bikers, pedestrians and horse and bu es all using th ame street and no traffic jam. He said traffic is about travel, circulation d access and also abou obility not speed. Mr. Broz talked out the historical perspective of the inters system and how it has shaped the future. said the mission of the interstate system was to ve faster and most design standar ave followed this pattern of wider, faster, flatter, straight e , d cost was not an 3 4 .2. ( Page I of 1 Edina Transportation Commission Item VI.B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commission From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: November 18, 2010 Subject: Whole Foods — Transportation Impact Analysis; Centennial Lakes Recommendation: Agenda Item No.: VLB ACTION: ® Recommendation /Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Westwood Professional Services on November 10, 2010. Include for review are memos from WSB and Associates, dated November 4th /10th, 2010, memos from Westwood Professional Services dated November 8th /10th and the following staff report. Staff and WSB have reviewed the Transportation Impact Analysis and subsequent memos, from Westwood Professional Services for the Whole Food store in Centennial Lakes dated November 10, 2010, and believe the development team has met the requirements of the City's Transportation Impact Analysis. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for Whole Foods- Centennial Lakes does not adversely affect to the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: The Development Team is proposing to raze the Storables and Thomasville Furniture stores, which account for approximately 35,000 square feet of retail, and build a 32,000 square foot Whole Foods Grocery store northwest corner of the Centennial Lakes Shopping Center. G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\ 201011 I8_Item.VI.B_Whole_Foods.docx �a1 MEMORANDUM Date: November 10, 2010 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie. MN 55344 PHONE 952-937 -5159 FAX 952-937-59)2 TOLL FW 888-937 -5159 Re: Response to City/WSB Additional Comments on November 8th Whole Foods Draft TIA File 2010 -1178 To: Jack Sullivan, P.E., City of Edina From: Nick Erpelding, P.E., PTOE Jack — In response to the City's additional comments on the November 8`, draft of the Whole Foods Traffic Impact Analysis, please find the attached final signed TIA and responses below. Nick L One of the comments requested that information on how the peak Saturday hour was determined The information in the appendix just indicates that traffic corms were conducted on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PAL The question is how it was determined that this time frame was the peak period Please verify how this was determined As noted in our original response, the peak hours studied for the analysis, as agreed with you in our initial scoping meeting on September 16, 2010, were the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday midday peak hour. Counts were conducted from 4:00 -6:00 p.m. on a typical weekday and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on a typical Saturday as agreed upon in that meeting. These time periods typically substantially encompass the associated peak hours. 'Me traffic count data collected for this project did show that the Saturday Midday peak hour occurred within this 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. timeframe, from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The traffic count data finther showed that traffic volumes are approximately 15% higher during the weekday PM peak hour compared with the Saturday Midday peak hour. Based on ITE data in Trip Generation. a Edition (page 1498, Tables 1 and 2) the maximum variation in hourly shopping center traffic volumes across a typical Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.im is roughly 4 %. For shopping centers under 300,000 s.f., Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 5S ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �3 November 10, 2010 Page 2 such as Centennial Lakes, the variation is even less. The conclusion that can be drawn from this information is that Weekday PM peak hour remains the critical peak hour for analysis purposes, and the findings from the study remain intact. 2. The actual Synchro and SimTraffic modeling worksheets are now provided in the appendix Should the development be approved please submitted electronic copies of these files. Comment noted. The electronic Synchro and SimTraffic modeling files will be submitted to the City upon development approval. 3. The report now includes a section on Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. The text indicates on page 34 in the Bicycle section that a list of bike racks was included. This information was not shown in the report and should be provided. The report references the overall site plan for showing the sidewalk and pedestrian facilities. This is had to follow. A separate map should be provided showing all the existing pedestrian, bike and transit facilities and what will be added as part of the development. Figure 5 -1, a Pedestrian Connectivity Plan has been added to the TIA to more clearly depict existing and proposed pedestrian connections. A potential location for a bicycle rack near the proposed Whole Foods building is called out. OCT Westwood MEMORANDUM Date: November 8, 2010 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952- 937 -5150 FAX 952.937 -5822 TOLL FREE 888- 937 -5150 www.westwoodps.com Re: Response to City/WSB comments on October Whole Foods Draft TIA File 2010 -1178 To: Jack Sullivan, P.E., City of Edina From: Nick Erpelding, P.E., PTOE Jack — In response to the City's November 0 comments, and November 8t' email comment on the October Draft of the Whole Foods Traffic Impact Analysis, please find the attached updated TIA and responses below. Nick 1. We are assuming that the existing land uses are still /or were opened when the traffic counts were conducted This should be verified The two land uses slated for removal as part of the redevelopment, Storables and Thomasville Furniture, remain in operation today. 2. Traffic counts were conducted during the PM Peak and Saturday Peak hours. How was it determined that the Saturday late AM was the peak period? Two of the tables in the draft TIA (No -Build and Build operational analysis results; Tables 3 -2 and 4 -4) were labeled incorrectly as AM and PM. These tables have been corrected in the attached revised TIA. The peak hours studied for the analysis, as agreed with you in our initial scoping meeting on September 16, 2010, were the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday midday peak hour. As evidenced in the operational analysis results tables in the report, the weekday PM peak hour is the more critical of the two peak hours studied. 3. The operational analysis results shown in the appendix does not include available storage lengths for all approaches at each intersection. This information should be provided. Specifically how do the queues on each of the site driveway interact with the traffic in the parking lots? Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS November 8, 2010 Page 2 The distance to the first drive aisle at the site driveway intersections has been added to the operational analysis result tables. As shown in these tables (all scenarios) the 95th percentile queues on these approaches are less than the distance to the first drive aisle. No operational impacts are anticipated. 4. The operational tables in the appendix show a summary of the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis. The actual modeling worksheets should be provided. The complete Synchro and Sim Traffic worksheets are now included in the appendix. 5. The text indicates historical ADT volumes for France Avenue have been decreasing. What location was this analysis taken at? Is the downward trend consistent throughout the corridor or just at this one location? ADT information available through the MnDOT website indicates that these ADT volumes were collected somewhere south of 69th Street within the City of Edina. Presumably they were collected north of Minnesota Drive. Centennial Lakes is located within this roadway segment. Because further breakdown of the ADT count data on this segment is not available from MnDOT, no conclusions can be drawn as to trends within smaller segments. The attached revised TIA has been updated to better indicate the location of the MnDOT ADT counts. 6. Table 3 -1 shows the estimated traffic generation for the vacant shops within the Centennial Lakes retail center. a. It appears that this table shows the "Net New Trips "from this additional development and Tables 4 -1 and 4 -2 show the "Gross Trips "from the proposed development. These tables should be consistent. b. It is unclear what was used for the analysis, "New trips" or "Driveway trips "? This should be clarified. c. Were these trips distributed the same way as the proposed development traffic? These tables have been updated to be consistent with the Tables for Build traffic. Language has been added to the TIA noting that driveway trips, which include new and pass -by trips, were used to develop the Build traffic volumes used in the operational analysis. Infill trips for the No -Build scenario were subject to the same distribution pattern as the trips added under the Build scenario. Due to the location of vacant shops within Centennial Lakes, the assignment patterns for No -Build varied slightly from Build. Appendices B -4, B -5, and B -6 detail these differences. 7. Internal and Pass -by trip reductions were assumed as part of the analysis. These terms should be defined and documented in general in the main report. The details are ok in the appendix. This discussion should also explain why the 2nd addition of the Trip A -N November 8, 2010 Page 3 Generation Handbook was used for the internal and pass -by trips and the 8`h addition used for the actual generated trips. The following text has been inserted into the revised TIA to clarify the first of these comments: For the purposes of this study, internal trips are trips made from one Centennial Lakes land use to another that do not use the external roadway network. Pass -by trips are made by drivers that are already using the external roadway network, but choose to divert to the site (to pick up some groceries, for example) before continuing on their original route. The paragraphs discussing trip generation have been revised to address the second of these comments as follows: The trip generation rates utilized in this study are based on those documented in Trip Generation, 8th Edition, published by ITE. Trip Generation, 8'h Edition is considered the standard text in the traffic engineering profession for estimating gross trip generation potential. Internal and pass -by trips were estimated using data from ITE's Trip Generation Handbook. 2 "d Edition, to the extent possible. Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, is a companion text to Trip Generation, and is considered the standard text in the traffic engineering profession for estimating internal and pass -by trips. Consistent, conservative assumptions were made where the Handbook data was incomplete. These assumptions were reviewed by City staff prior to initiation of the analysis. Full details are available in the appendix. 8. It appears that all the pass -by trips where assumed going through the Parklawn Avenue intersection. Is this correct? Was this also the same assumption for the infill development? This assumption should be documented in the report. That is not quite correct. The following text was added to address this comment: All pass -by trips were assumed to initiate from France Avenue. The directional split of these trips was based on existing traffic volumes: 50% northbound, 50% southbound for both the weekday PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Pass -by trips were split between the Parklawn, Plaza Drive, and West 76`" Street driveways. All trips were primarily assigned to the driveway that provided the shortest trip andlor most direct route. Further details on routing assumptions are available in the appendix. Similar to new trips, pass -by trips were primarily assigned to the driveway most convenient to their intended destination. Because Plaza Drive is limited to right - in/right -out movements only, no southbound pass -by trips were assigned to this driveway. Because Whole Foods, Storables and Thomasville Furniture are situated in the northern half of the site, traffic exiting the site from these uses destined southbound W November 8, 2010 Page 4 was assigned to favor Parklawn over West 76th. For the infill (No- Build) scenario added pass -by trips, because the vacant parcels were distributed more evenly across the site, a more balanced usage of Parklawn and West 76th was assumed. Appendices B -4, B -5, and B -6 detail trip assignment differences among the scenarios. 9. Summaries of the Traffic operation analysis are shown in Tables 2 -1, 3 -2 and 4 -4. One additional table would be helpful showing the comparison of all three analyses together. In addition, it would be helpful to see not only the overall LOS and delay but each approach and movement in the tables in the main portion of the report. Tables have been added to the body of the report to address both of these comments. 10. Although the report indicates that the queue lengths do not increase significantly. A table showing a comparison of the queue lengths for each operations analysis should be provided in main portion of the report. Tables have been added to the body of the report to address this comment. 11. The report does not address any Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. A discussion on what transit, pedestrian /bike facilities and other TDM strategies are currently in place and what would be included as part of this proposed development needs to be included A chapter has been added to the report to address TDM concerns. The chapter notes existing pedestrian, bike, and transit amenities and provides suggestions for TDM measures that could be adopted to foster continued reductions in peak hour traffic generation by the redeveloped Whole Foods. 12. Follow -up comment received via email on November 8, 2010: Whole Foods Team, It was brought to our attention that there is a discrepancy between the square footage shown in the transportation study and that of the preliminary plan sheet (A2.1). The study has 32,300 and plan sheet has 36,692 (33,340 +3352 in the mezzanine office area. I realize these numbers may seems relatively similar but the additional space can have impacts on the transportation study. Please include in your response a clarification or adjustment of the traffic study. Regards, Jack Ail November 8, 2010 Page 5 The TIA as published assumes a 32,300 s.f. footprint for Whole Foods. This square footage does not include a 1,000 s.f. heated/cooled cart corral storage area or 3,352 s.f. mezzanine office area. The cart corral storage area was considered exterior to the building for the purposes of trip generation. The mezzanine office space, if considered part of the store for trip generation estimate purposes, would add roughly 30 peak hour trip ends (15 in 15 out). If considered a separatist office use for trip generation purposes, this 3,352 s.f. space would generate less than 10 peak hour trip ends. The ITE rates in Trip Generation are nationwide averages. In reviewing the data plots for land use 850, Supermarket, it is evident that that a change of plus or minus 30 peak hour trips falls well within the error range of this dataset. Added to the fact that operations throughout the study area operate acceptably, this discrepancy does not impact our conclusion that no mitigation is necessary to provide for the safe and efficient movement of traffic associated with the Whole Foods redevelopment. A-)�j Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: November 10, 2010 Re: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Final Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 We have reviewed the Final Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Westwood for the proposed Whole Foods grocery store at the Centennial Lakes retail center. The Final Report includes addressing the review comments from November 4, 2010. Based on our review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis the following additional questions and comments should be discussed during the presentation at the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on November 18`h. One of the comments requested that information on how the peak Saturday hour was determined. The information in the appendix just indicates that traffic counts were conducted on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. The question is how it was determined that this time frame was the peak period. Please verify how this was determined. 2. The actual Synchro and SimTraffic modeling worksheets are now provided in the appendix. Should the development be approved please submitted electronic copies of these files. The report now includes a section on Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. The text indicates on page 34 in the Bicycle section that a list of bike racks was included. This information was not shown in the report and should be provided. The report references the overall site plan for showing the sidewalk and pedestrian facilities. This is had to follow. A separate map should be provided showing all the existing pedestrian, bike and transit facilities and what will be added as part of the development. Based on these comments and my review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis it can be concluded that, the Whole Foods proposed development will not have a significant impact on existing or future traffic operations adjacent to the site. It is therefore my recommendation that the Traffic Impact Analysis be approved with the minor clarifications discussed above. �� SB WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & Associates, Inc. .Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: November 10, 2010 Re: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Final Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 We have reviewed the Final Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Westwood for the proposed Whole Foods grocery store at the Centennial Lakes retail center. The Final Report includes addressing the review comments from November 4, 2010. Based on our review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis the following additional questions and comments should be discussed during the presentation at the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on November 18`h. One of the comments requested that information on how the peak Saturday hour was determined. The information in the appendix just indicates that traffic counts were conducted on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. The question is how it was determined that this time frame was the peak period. Please verify how this was determined. 2. The actual Synchro and SimTraffic modeling worksheets are now provided in the appendix. Should the development be approved please submitted electronic copies of these files. The report now includes a section on Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. The text indicates on page 34 in the Bicycle section that a list of bike racks was included. This information was not shown in the report and should be provided. The report references the overall site plan for showing the sidewalk and pedestrian facilities. This is had to follow. A separate map should be provided showing all the existing pedestrian, bike and transit facilities and what will be added as part of the development. Based on these comments and my review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis it can be concluded that, the Whole Foods proposed development will not have a significant impact on existing or future traffic operations adjacent to the site. It is therefore my recommendation that the Traffic Impact Analysis be approved with the minor clarifications discussed above. �� Prepared For: Prepared By: �9 ^l� (�MI� -ERICA o e 1 "WREAL ESTATh.- MINNESOTA. LIA, 7 Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Whole Foods Centennial Lakes City of Edina, Minnesota November 10, 2010 Prepared for City of Edina Mid - America Real Estate - Minnesota, LLC Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Project No. 20101178 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page i November 10, 2010 AD( TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Whole Foods Centennial Lakes City of Edina, Minnesota REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. V&IV 11/10/2010 Nicholas J. Erpelding, P.E., PT01f Date License No. 44582 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page ii November 10, 2010 A'3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY ..................................................... ............................... A LBACKGROUND .................................................................... ..............................1 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................... ..............................4 TrafficVolumes ....................................................................... ..............................4 Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control ................................... ..............................7 TrafficOperations ................................................................... .............................10 3. NO -BUILD SCENARIO ....................................................... .............................15 TrafficVolumes ...................................................................... .............................15 TrafficOperations ................................................................... .............................19 4. BUILD SCENARIO .............................................................. .............................22 TripGeneration ....................................................................... .............................22 TripDistribution ..................................................................... .............................24 TripAssignment ..................................................................... .............................24 TrafficVolumes ...................................................................... .............................24 TrafficOperations ................................................................... .............................30 5. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT ............................... .............................34 Pedestrian............................................................................... .............................34 Bicycle.................................................................................... .............................34 Transit.................................................................................... .............................36 TDMStrategies ....................................................................... .............................37 6. RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................... .............................38 6. APPENDIX ........................................................................... .............................39 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page iii November 10, 2010 W FIGURES Figure1 -1. Location Map .......................................................... ..............................1 Figure1 -2. Site Plan .................................................................. ..............................3 Figure 2 -1. 2010 Existing PM Traffic Volumes ......................... ..............................5 Figure 2 -2. 2010 Existing Saturday Traffic Volumes ................. ..............................6 Figure 2 -3. 2010 Existing Lane Geometry ................................. ..............................9 Figure 2 -4. 2010 Existing PM Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ................13 Figure 2 -5. 2010 Existing Saturday Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ........14 Figure 3 -1. France Avenue Historical ADT Volumes ................ .............................15 Figure 3 -2. 2013 No -Build PM Traffic Volumes ....................... .............................17 Figure 3 -3. 2013 No -Build Saturday Traffic Volumes ............... .............................18 Figure 3 -4. 2013 No -Build PM Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ...............20 Figure 3 -5. 2013 No -Build Saturday Operational Analysis Detailed Summary....... 21 Figure 4 -1. Trip Distribution ..................................................... .............................25 Figure 4 -2. PM Trip Assignment .............................................. .............................26 Figure 4 -3. Saturday Trip Assignment ...................................... .............................27 Figure 4 -4. 2013 Build PM Traffic Volumes ............................. .............................28 Figure 4 -5. 2013 Build Saturday Traffic Volumes ..................... .............................29 Figure 4 -6. 2013 Build PM Operational Analysis Detailed Summary .....................32 Figure 4 -7. 2013 Build Saturday Operational Analysis Detailed Summary .............32 Figure 5 -1. Pedestrian Connectivity Plan .................................. .............................35 Figure 5 -2. Existing Bus Routes and Stops ............................... .............................36 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page iv November 10, 2010 P(3( TABLES Table 2 -1. 2010 Existing Traffic Operations ............................ .............................11 Table 3 -1. Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies — Gross Trips ......................................... .............................16 Table 3 -2. Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies — Gross, Driveway and Net New Trips ... .............................16 Table 3 -3. 2013 No -Build Traffic Operations .......................... .............................19 Table 4 -1. Trip Generation Estimates — Existing Land Uses to be Removed — Gross Trips....................................................................... .............................22 Table 4 -2. Trip Generation Estimates — Proposed Land Use — Gross Trips ...........22 Table 4 -3. Trip Generation Estimates — Existing Land Uses to be Removed + Proposed Land Use — Gross, Driveway and Net New Trips ..................23 Table 4 -4. 2013 Build Traffic Operations ................................ .............................30 Table 4 -5. Traffic Operations — Three Scenario Comparison ... .............................31 436 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page v November 10, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Whole Foods redevelopment will result in a net decrease in square footage of approximately 2,700 square feet. The nature of the land use, retail, will remain unchanged. The proposed new land use, a Whole Foods grocery store, is likely to generate more traffic per square foot than the existing land uses (Thomasville Furniture and Storables, a general merchandise retailer). However, the magnitude of this increase is small, at 145 new trip ends (78 in, 67 out) during the weekday PM peak hour and 133 new trip ends (69 in, 64 out) during the Saturday Midday peak hour — roughly one additional car entering and exiting per minute. The City's Synchro /SimTraffic traffic model was calibrated to mirror existing conditions before being used to assess future (2013) traffic conditions. Under existing conditions the model showed that the intersections around the perimeter of the Centennial Lakes shopping center (the "study area ") operate within acceptable thresholds during both the weekday PM peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.) and Saturday Midday peak hour (11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.). In the future, the model shows that after accounting for potential background growth in area traffic at a rate of 0.5% per year, potential traffic growth associated with infilling of vacancies elsewhere in Centennial Lakes, and additional traffic generated by the proposed Whole Foods redevelopment, traffic operations throughout the study area will remain within acceptable thresholds. No mitigation to accommodate the additional traffic is necessary. 01 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page vi November 10, 2010 1. BACKGROUND Mid - America Real Estate - Minnesota, LLC and Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC are proposing to redevelop a portion of the Centennial Lakes retail center in Edina, Minnesota. This site is located on the east side of France Avenue between Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street. Figure 1 -1 Location Map Source: Google Maps Centennial Lakes houses an assortment of approximately 30 retail tenants, ranging in size from 1,000 to 30,000 square feet (leasable area) with an overall total square footage of roughly 200,000 s.f. The proposed redevelopment plan calls for the removal of two of the land uses currently in operation: the roughly 25,700 s.f. Storables general merchandise store and the approximately 9,300 s.f. Thomasville furniture store. In their place an approximately 32,300 s.f. Whole Foods grocery store is to be constructed. The resulting change in site square footage will be a net decrease of 2,700 s.f. Construction is to proceed in one phase, with completion in 2012. 01� Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 November 10, 2010 W' ]0!. St @ W TOt. st t I W "M S W 7'Jti SI 3 r ASV ® $xf a+ie,w Ra n g v j w .'r.. : st 41 'T• 4wN. Q •� {hy Beti Mr<Ln j�nuak ] i hurhn Rf •1' : IJ 4tem0 Wi +N 14 St 4,44.LU `Ar^r4'r •' • t.J.r. ar -,� � st wrina i f f wr:�a 51 r 3r - .n E:t+• ' ^M..a a. n e0' q, cP) 100 n. < auk Pro ect 4z.L., � " Location ; .ry ;7A�r�Y W 7tln st s W 7tti 91 W TBt, St Y W i y Ed1 � � W Eknnnayfi � W TTtM St W i M St Pw. 3r f � k.• � v..q a I.w.Kwl• o- R.n.1rw..e o., IAutv.poq.. EMI.1 0���� r, ..'+, 100 3 .. ��ler -n^.• X A•.� eky '� \ CI•'� O K A— .� ., CL'IT s 2 x aa x' e•. v i Source: Google Maps Centennial Lakes houses an assortment of approximately 30 retail tenants, ranging in size from 1,000 to 30,000 square feet (leasable area) with an overall total square footage of roughly 200,000 s.f. The proposed redevelopment plan calls for the removal of two of the land uses currently in operation: the roughly 25,700 s.f. Storables general merchandise store and the approximately 9,300 s.f. Thomasville furniture store. In their place an approximately 32,300 s.f. Whole Foods grocery store is to be constructed. The resulting change in site square footage will be a net decrease of 2,700 s.f. Construction is to proceed in one phase, with completion in 2012. 01� Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 November 10, 2010 Access to and from the site will remain unchanged. Three accesses currently serve the Centennial lakes site, one each from France Avenue, Parklawn Avenue, and West 76th Street. The France Avenue access is limited to right - in/right -out movements only by a median along France Avenue, while the remaining two accesses serve all movements. Intersection control at the France Avenue and Parklawn Avenue driveways is side - street stop control, while the West 76th Street driveway is controlled via traffic signal. Plaza Drive, the east/west driveway accessing France Avenue, divides the site roughly in half. Two drive aisles, termed West Site Drive and East Site Drive for the purposes of this study, intersect Plaza Drive, providing access to parking. The concept site plan, Figure 1 -2, details the access locations and site layout in general. The objectives of this study are as follows: 1. Document traffic operations under existing operating conditions. 2. Assess future traffic conditions if the project does not proceed (No -Build scenario). 3. Analyze future operations if the redevelopment proceeds as planned (Build scenario). 4. Assess the impact of the redevelopment and recommend mitigation measures if needed. Working together with City staff, a set of base assumptions for this study was developed. The first base assumption made was to designate 2013 as the future design year for this study to coincide with one year after build -out. Next, the PM and Saturday Midday peak hours were agreed upon as the time periods to be studied, as these are typically the busiest times for retail land uses. The following list of seven intersections was identified as the study area in concert with City staff: • France Avenue and Parklawn Avenue • France Avenue and West 76th Street • Parklawn Avenue and Site Access • West 76th Street and Site Access • France Avenue and Plaza Drive • Plaza Drive and West Site Drive • Plaza Drive and East Site Drive Additional assumptions made in cooperation with City staff are described throughout this report. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 2 November 10, 2010 Figure 1-2 Concept Site Plan ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NM Tm GML em .m 61243"= Mh.wft w001 F.Gi] lm ror". c Rewsb"Ift" Dft B SG `MOD 0 % I D A •142 EPACES -no.m �m W) PROPUSED • 161SPACES I 47— WOLEFOONIANOXT i PETAL G=ING OTAL LEASEABLE TOTAL Sm FOOTPRW 3a.mo SP W.600 W FF 847.0 : WHOLIEFOODS UGT) I FF W.0 CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA EDINA, NIN ---------- wo SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 • =50'-0" OVERALL SITE PARKING DATA 194,626 — 12,000 (EDINA MAINT DEDUCT) = 182,626 SIP 182,626 - 16,660 (B, C & D STOR. & TOILETS DEDUCT) = 165,966 SF 165,966 —1,500 (A DOCK, STOR. & TOILETS DEDUCT) TOTAL = 164,466 SF OVERALL TOTAL STALLS = 950 OVERALL SITE PARKING RATIO= 5.8/1000 AW Arrhitadural Cannarflum. LLC. 2010 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Manual PM and Saturday Midday turning movement counts were conducted under Westwood's direction at each of the seven site intersections. On direction received from City staff, the counts were conducted from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, October 6, and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Saturday, October 9, 2010. Based on the data collected, the weekday PM and Saturday midday peak travel hours occur from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. and 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., respectively. Figures 2 -1 and 2 -2 show the existing peak hour turning movement volumes for the study area. Detailed traffic count information is available in the appendix. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes, as reported on the Mn/DOT website for year 2009, are as follows: • France Avenue (south of 69th Street, north of 494): 28,500 • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): 3,500 • West 76h Street (East of Site): 9,100 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 4 November 10, 2010 40 Figure 2 -1 Turning Movement Volume zuiu txisnng - rm 28Q I 17- U) U) m m W cg' F.1 ( 7 U LO 00 8 1 k' �1 "y Parklawn N CO � N M� ��� E� -1412 72 3 6 6 ,�,�► pve 6� 11 IV6 W 76th St Park�aWn 43—> $q_ '" y Lo M U N U N c L U- "' r-15 F`-1 M X122 M r- o F-40 N M 21 ° X38 �M 1 Plaza Dr �f(I 25 COTcC 4_ °T ' 28Q I 17- U) U) m m W 7,; a� (D c ca L u- Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood A a Not to Scale cg' 7 U LO 00 8 3 +476—> N M� ' W 76th St 3 6 6 ,�,�► y IV6 W 76th St 7,; a� (D c ca L u- Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood A a Not to Scale Fiaure 2 -2 Turning Movement Volumes 2010 Y a� Q m c co U. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes IuIZnZuIu Westwood Not to Scale NN 2� Parklawn Ave T-65 Go v F-23 22 87 T Parklawn 14-4 c,%.4 ',t- LO 78--,j clN. cn m Q co v NtP C M LL ° q* I`-9 TN-1 o _ 2 X160 J M 5 X 3 ,�J �, 2Plaza Dr 26 C 2 T cC N 46-> co m N 42-> `- 41-� 32� U) m m W y V� V x-93 Q 00 V- X 160 160 9 61-4 � W 76th St 61,j cj '� o X38 W 76th St Y a� Q m c co U. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes IuIZnZuIu Westwood Not to Scale Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control Roadway geometry was verified through an inventory conducted October 12, 2010, by Westwood staff. Signal timing data was provided by Hennepin County staff. General characteristics of the site include a suburban setting with wide intersection radii and turn lanes at major intersections. Sidewalks /paths are typically provided on at least one side of each roadway. On- street parking is generally prohibited, and the topography of the area is relatively flat. France Avenue (Hennepin County State Aid Highway 17) is a 6 -lane arterial roadway running north/south adjacent to the site. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 40 mph. Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street are 4 -lane divided collectors. Speeds are 30 mph. The signalized intersection of France Avenue with Parklawn Avenue operates in standard 8 -phase fashion, with protected signal phasing for mainline lefts and protected/permissive phasing for side street lefts. Storage for the westbound left turn bay is fairly short, at approximately 120 feet plus taper. Pedestrians are accommodated via pushbutton actuation and are permitted to cross all four legs of the intersection. France Avenue and West 76th Street, also 8- phase, provides protected -only phasing for all four left turn movements. Dual left turn lanes are in place for.the side street left turn movements. Storage bay length for the westbound left turn movement is limited, measuring only 150 feet plus taper, constrained by virtue of lining up end -to- end with the left turn lane for the site access intersection to the east. Channelization is provided for all right turn movements, which are all yield - controlled. The northbound approach has a fourth through lane, which eventually drops as a right turn lane at Parklawn Avenue. Peds are accommodated on all four legs via pushbuttons. Left turn phasing (of the protected/permissive variety) is provided only for the mainline movements at the intersection of West 76th Street and Site Access. Storage bay lengths for these two movements are minimal, measuring only approximately 50 feet plus taper. The southbound side street approach (exiting Centennial Lakes) is two -lane, providing a dedicated right turn lane in addition to a shared through/left turn lane. The northbound side street approach features only one lane. Peds are prohibited from crossing West 76th Street via posted signs. Ped pushbuttons are provided to facilitate crossing the side street legs. The side - street stop controlled intersection of Parklawn Avenue and Site Access is similar in geometric configuration to the West 76th Street access, with short 50 -foot mainline lefts and 2 northbound approach lanes. France Avenue and Plaza Drive is controlled via stop sign on the minor leg. One westbound lane, limited to right turns, is provided. The northbound right turn lane Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 7 November 10, 2010 Ali functions as a shared through/right turn lane, ending as a right turn lane at Parklawn Drive. The westerly internal intersection on Plaza Drive is controlled via 3 -way stop, with inbound (eastbound) traffic being the approach not required to stop. One lane is provided for each approach. The geometric configuration for the easterly internal intersection is similar. The only operational difference between the two is that the lower- volume east intersection operates as an uncontrolled intersection with no stop or yield signs on any of the approaches. Figure 2 -3 illustrates the roadway geometry described above. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 8 November 10, 2010 W Figure 2-3 � T T T �,Park�awn Avg a� a� U C f0 U- TTr I2 L 0 M am a U C (0 U- TTrW76thSt STOP ...M. Rm 0 -I STOP T N. m n nCD NN y Plaza Dr Parklawn Lane Geometr cu-I u Cxwu y 4 L Q A-1 mi W y� V� V Q w y � W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 7U /27 /ZU7U Westwood ``, Not to Scale Traffic Operations Traffic operational analyses were conducted using the industry- current Synchro/ SimTraffic 7 software package. Synchro /SimTraffic uses the data and methodology published by the Transportation Research Board in the year 2000 version of their Highway Capacity Manual. Results from the Sim Traffic portion of the Synchro /SimTraffic software package are reported unless otherwise noted. SimTraffic results were reported to fully account for the capacity - limiting effects caused by the close spacing of the study area intersections and existence of short turn pockets at several locations. Traffic operations are primarily rated by Level of Service (LOS), a grade ranging from "A" (best) to "F" (worst). Generally, Level of Service D represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour in the Twin Cities metro area, while LOS E is considered acceptable for individual movements. At side - street stop controlled intersections, delay is primarily incurred only on the side street approaches. It can be typical for a side - street stop controlled intersection to have good overall LOS and poor side - street LOS during peak periods. Overall LOS is reported along with the LOS of the worst individual movement or movements for all unsignalized intersections. Traffic operations can also be measured by looking at queuing. A queue is a line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. Where queues from a congested intersection extend through upstream intersections or driveways, operations and safety can be impacted. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered a standard for design purposes. For year 2010 conditions, the Synchro /SimTraffic model was calibrated to match field- observed conditions as closely as possible. In order to more accurately model the coordinated traffic signal control conditions along the France Avenue corridor, the immediately adjacent intersections on France Avenue (Gallagher Avenue to the north and Minnesota Drive to the south) were included in the model. Turning movement count estimates for these intersections were completed using the 2010 count data in combination with 2007 count data provided by the County. Details on these estimates are provided in the appendix. Table 2 -1 provides an overview of the study area LOS results for the 2010 Existing conditions analysis. Figures 2 -4 and 2 -5 provide more detailed summaries for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively. Complete Synchro and SimTraffic printouts are available in the appendix. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 10 November 10, 2010 �47 Table 2 -1 2010 Existing Traffic Operations Intersection PM Saturday LOS Delay LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 24 B 18 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 29 B 15 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access* A/B 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 8 A 6 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/C 4 A/B 3 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 3 A/A 4 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: * Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. PM Peak Hour Operations for the PM peak hour under existing conditions fall within acceptable thresholds according to the model. All study area intersections operate at acceptable Level of Service D or better. All movements operate at acceptable LOS E or better. Two of the study area intersections experience 95`h percentile queues longer than available turn lane storage bays: France Avenue & West 761' Street The 95th percentile queue on the eastbound left turn movement is estimated by SimTraffic at 207 feet, roughly two car lengths beyond the available storage bay. West 76" Street & Site Access The 95`h percentile queue for the eastbound left turn movement is 80 feet, roughly one car length beyond the available storage bay. Operations at the internal site intersections on Plaza Drive are also noteworthy: Internal Site Intersections Operations at the two internal site intersections are very efficient, with delays under 10 seconds per vehicle (LOS A) and 95`h percentile queues three vehicles in length or less. Saturday Peak Hour Acceptable operations are also shown throughout the model for existing Saturday Midday peak hour conditions. All study area intersections are at LOS D or better, while all movements report at LOS E or better. One 95`h percentile queue extends beyond the available turn bay: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 11 November 10, 2010 A ki West 76th Street & Site Access SimTraffic projects the 95h percentile queue for the eastbound left turn movement at 72 feet, one car length beyond the available storage bay. Internal Site Intersections Similar to the weekday PM peak hour, operations at the two internal site intersections are very efficient, with delays under 10 seconds per vehicle (LOS A) and 95th percentile queues two to three vehicles in length. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 12 November 10, 2010 /V`4 Figure 2 -4 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2010 Existing PM Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes F T> <- T 4 Volume 115 . 43 89 72 41 122 54 1315 41 149 1182 85 SimTraffic Delay 41.5 44.8 19.4 40.6 42.4 14.0 54.9 20.6 2.3 48.9 22.1 22.2 24.2 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D B D C A D C C C Storage 120 1 325 1 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1401 132 941 76 841 931 3861 39 1931 330 82 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes < <- I <- TTTT F TTT Volume 234 476 265 213 178 237 79 916 100 141 1080 125 SimTraffic Delay 70.4 56.1 10.0 59.8 47.2 2.5 42.2 9.4 1.9 68.2 26.3 2.71 29.3 SimTraffic LOS E E A E D A D A A E C A C Storage 170 200 160 80 80 310 SimTraffic 95th Queue 207 289 143 1481 131 46 1371 1131 217 324 101 Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes F TT> F TT> <T 4 <T 4 Volume 26 110 81 17 107 7 36 2 21 46 5 801 1 SimTraffic Delay 3.0 1.2 1.3 3.8 0.1 6.3 11.2 2.6 5.5 7.7 2.9 2.2 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A B A A A A A Storage 50 50 120 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 191 3 201 3 45 1 32 43 45 102 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) Lanes F TT> <- TT> <T> < T> Volume 84 609 10 10 493 66 56 21 47 34 2 81 SimTraffic Delay 10.5 7.6 8.3 9.6 6.0 2.4 20.6 21.4 8.9 19.0 24.4 4.0 7.6 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A A C C I A B C A A Storage 50 50 170 ** SimTraffic 95th Qu--e-uej-801 197 121 95 84 51 1 57 103 Plaza Or & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> itttt Volume 122 1287 97 1345 SimTraffic Delay 16.4 2.8 1.8 3.2 3.5 SimTraffic LOS C A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 94 4 15 104 Plaza Or & West Site Dr (3-way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 25 43 28 21 401 15 56 241 30 30 411 23 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.3 0.2 4.6 5.0 2.8 4.11 5.2 3.2 4.4 5.51 2.9 3.3 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A I A A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 47 60 56 105 Plaza Or & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> . <T> <T> Volume 40 46 17 1 38 1 8 11 1 1 1 30 SimTraffic Delay 1.6 0.5 0.3 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.5 0.3 0.5 0.21 0.2 0.7 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A A A A I A A I A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 16 3 10 7 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 W 11/8/2010 Figure 2 -5 Operational Analysis Results Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2010 Existing Saturday Node lintersection I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound IOvera 8: 101 10: Au. ra Grnnro Awa n Lanes F T> F T F TTT 4 F TTT> SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 Volume 87 14 78 22 23 65 52 1174 53 114 938 38 SimTraffic Delay 45.4 39.8 10.9 41.2 51.5 9.8 45.7 19.5 2.7 52.1 9.6 8.3 18.4 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D A D B A D A A B Storage SimTraffic Delay 120 325 12.81 410 1.8 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1301 83 461 42 501 751 3501 44 1591 159 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) A A A Lanes <-E- TT 4 F<- TT -> <- TTTT 4 F TTT Volume 95 61 61 160 43 93 42 1054 129 132 863 43 104 SimTraffic Delay 49.9 53.6 5.1 45.6 41.0 1.8 38.3 8.3 2.0 54.2 7.4 1.8 14.8 SimTraffic LOS D D A D D A D A A D A A B Storage 170 0.5 200 160 5.61 80 5.01 5.81 80 4.4 5.91 1 310 3.6 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 891 681 A 1081 581 A 741 1191 I A 171 168 A I A Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Storage Lanes <- T'I`> <- TT> <T 57 <T 58 Volume 11 72 78 20 70 2 30 3 25 2 2 6 SimTraffic Delay 2.7 1.0 1.2 3.1 0.1 1 5.7 7.3 2.3 5.5 7.8 2.3 1.6 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage 50 SimTraffic LOS 50 A 120 ** A A A A SimTraffic 95th Queue ill 8 151 A 42 1 44 14 18 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 Lanes <- TT> < TT> <T> F T> Volume 138 175 10 6 198 74 5 1 5 62 2 97 SimTraffic Delay 7.2 5.3 3.5 6.8 6.8 2.41 12.0 15.61 3.3 15.4 5.9 2.6 6.2 I SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A I B B I A B A A A ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 Asl 11/8/2010 Storage I 5u 1 Su 1 1 Liu' SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 721 53 61 43 24 61 56 103 Plaza Or & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 160 1123 113 1040 SimTraffic Delay 12.81 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.8 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 105 104 Plaza Or & West Site Or (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 26 461 41 251 651 9 601 39 26 30 44 31 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.5 0.2 4.41 5.61 3.1 5.01 5.81 3.5 4.4 5.91 3.3 3.6 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A I A A I A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 6 57 76 58 105 Plaza Or & East Site Or (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 25 42 32 2 43 1 13 11 1 1 1 43 SimTraffic Delay 1.8 0.6 0.4 1.1 0.3 0.5 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A A A A I A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 14 9 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 Asl 11/8/2010 3. NO -BUILD SCENARIO Traffic Volumes No -Build traffic volumes for the 2013 design year were forecast by factoring up existing counts by a background growth rate of 0.5% annually. This growth rate was established in cooperation with City staff. Factors impacting the choice of background growth rate included two items. The first was a review of historical ADT volumes on France Avenue dating back to 1999. This data shows a downward trend in traffic volumes of roughly 0.7% annually, as shown in Figure 3 -1. Figure 3 -1 France Avenue Historical ADT Volumes 40,000 35,000 ;— - -, — — 30,000 � 25,000 —L —,- Q 20,000 —i --� i 15,000 —; 10,000 5,000 0 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Year Source: MnDOT Website The second item considered in the establishment of an appropriate background growth rate was the County -wide State Aid traffic forecast. For Hennepin County, Mn/DOT State Aid's 20 -year traffic projection factor of 1.1 yields an annual growth rate of just under 0.5 %. To provide for a worst -case scenario, City staff stipulated use of the 0.5% positive annual rate for the study. Also typically considered in background growth forecasts are planned nearby developments. In this case, City staff was aware of no such developments. The final item considered in estimating future background traffic volumes for the study area was potential filling of vacant space within the remainder of the Centennial Lakes shopping center itself. A review of current vacancies for Centennial Lakes indicated total vacant square footage of 13,400, for a vacancy rate of 7 %. According to the owner, this rate is lower than the 10% rate typically assumed by bankers and investors as average for this type of retail setting. Again, looking to provide for a worst -case scenario, City staff specified that full (100 %) occupancy be assumed for the No -Build scenario. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 15 November 10, 2010 Asp The trip generation potential of the vacant retail space was estimated using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data and methodologies, discussed further in Section 4, Build Scenario. Tables 3 -1 and 3 -2 show the number of trips generated associated with infill of current Centennial Lakes vacancies. Complete details are available in the appendix. Table 3 -1 Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies Gross Trios Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday PM Peak I 3aturaay I Saturda Peak Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Specialty Retail 814 13,400 s.f. 297 297 16 20 282 282 28 28 Table 3 -2 Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies . Gross, Drivewav and Net New Tri s Land Use Weekday PM Peak Saturday Saturday Peak I Enter I Exit Enter I Exit Enter I Exit Enter I Exit Gross Driveway Trips (New Trips + Net New Trips Specialty Retail 254 1 2541 131 171 241 1 2411 24 24 The anticipated 2013 No -Build scenario volumes, developed by incorporating the 0.5% background growth rate plus the infill of existing Centennial Lakes vacancies, are shown on Figures 3 -2 and 3 -3 for the Weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively. The projected No -Build ADT volumes (and change vs. Existing), are as follows: • France Avenue (North of Site): 29,080 ( +580 / +2.0 %) • France Avenue (South of Site): 29,130 ( +630 / +2.2 %) • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): 3,590 ( +90 / +2.6 %) • West 76th Street (East of Site): 9,300 ( +200 / +2.2 %) Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 16 November 10, 2010 . X53 Figure 3 -2 Turning Movement Volumes 2013 No -Build - PM 1 `� 1$ parklawn Ave rn 0)(0 X24 LO co CO 75 I 12� �u�NNw 117 Park1 0 aw Ave $dry 44—> ►n c,) 90-� cA. Q -, U N C cc L V.. CD "-15 _ F`-1 � N N cco X41 c; r r X39 X130 21 �, 1 Plaza Dr 28 T 41 T 0 0 44—> co c�v ch 47—> 0O 31� 17-:, 0 0 d U) CO U CO W UU U N o X241 E- -182 223 0 23 N �' �SO� T I' W 76th St 8 10 263 ao M o > > °'.0 6 ryTC�' W 76th St (D (D U C LO Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood �� Not to Scale o 0 „ 0 0 CL 0 CL CD n O 7 W d r 0 w z o �+ o o iv N 0 N d o s �D O 2109 7`44 a' a' <-876 France Ave S �^' 135 43 1 1077 cc N in .p 133—j --4 5 1198 -� rn 54-y s X36 - -fl w X 2109 6 Site Access oC Eil " O7 CD 13 NT 1-y _ SaO�d ONG N s 0 -0 7 c w w N � � 3 w cQ O O 63 CD = 3 a� vJ � 0 , c c 0) CD Nl "`0° ( (-951 1057 F France Ave S T 124 1138 � 1 53 T 125-y - --4 5 1198 -� 54-y X36 - -fl w X <-45 O O West Site Dr,) 0 0 65 N 40-4 c N1c 26-1 C CD *.,8 4 w4N + +-1 -0 7 c w w N � � 3 w cQ O O 63 CD = 3 a� vJ � 0 , c c 0) CD Nl Traffic Operations Traffic operational analyses were conducted for the Weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hour conditions for the 2013 No -Build scenario. Table 3 -3 summarizes the overall results. Table 3 -3 2013 No -Build Traffic Operations Intersection PM Saturday LOS Delay LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 25 B 19 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 29 B 15 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access* A/B 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 7 A 7 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/B 4 A/B 3 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 3 A/A 4 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: * Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. PM Peak Hour Overall intersection and movement -by- movement LOS is acceptable throughout the study area. Changes from Existing conditions are very minor. No movements with oversize 95`h percentile queues other than the two movements noted under Existing conditions are anticipated. No change in queuing for these two movements is forecast. 95th percentile queues at the internal site intersections remain at three vehicles or less. Saturday Peak Hour LOS throughout the study area remains within acceptable thresholds, with little change from Existing conditions. No change in 95 percentile queuing at the movement noted under Existing conditions is forecast. No additional movements experience oversize 95`x' percentile queues. 95th percentile queues at the internal site intersections remain stable at three vehicles or less. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 19 November 10, 2010 Figure 3 -4 Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave 8, 10: 10: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Eastbound I Westbound 2013 No -Build PM Southbound Lanes Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue W 801 180 --)u I 101 101 84 I 53 -V 62 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Volume 117 44 90 75 42 1241 55 13391 42 1561 1199 86 TTTT> SimTraffic Delay 44.8 46.8 27.4 41.4 47.9 13.61 50.3 20.1 2.9 49.1 22.7 •25.3 24.7 SimTraffic LOS D D C D D B D C A D C C C Storage 3.3 120 3.'. 325 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1381 164 1011 71 871 91 362 42 187 348 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) 190 ** Lanes FF TT FF TT 4 F TTTT F TTT 4 Volume 238 4831 269 223 182 241 80 934 103 144 1097 127 <T> SimTraffic Delay 68.5 56.6 9.5 60.7 45.7 2.4 40.0 9.4 2.0 77.9 25.7 2.8 29.4 SimTraffic LOS E E A E D A D A A E C A C Storage 170 3.3 200 160 SimTraffic LOS 80 I A I A 80 I A A 1 310 A SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 185 283 132 1711 1281 29 125 106 239 3301 83 SimTraffic 95th Queue Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) 50 58 60 Lanes F TT> F 1 4 <T <t> <T> Volume 26 112 87 18 1091 7 39 2 23 47 5 81 1 SimTraffic Delay 3.0 1.3 1.3 2.8 0.2 0.2 6.4 13.0 2.5 5.6 7.9 2.9 2.2 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A I A A B A A A A A Storage 50 A 50 I A 120 ** Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 191 6 21 SimTraffic 95th Queue 45 33 48 47 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) Lanes E- TT> F TT> I <T> F T> Volume 87 618 10 10 500 69 57 2 48 37 2 90 SimTraffic Delay 10.5 6.8 4.4 12.3 6.3 3.2 23.3 18.91 8.11 20.3 15.1 4.2 7.4 SimTraffic LOS B A A B A A C B I A C B A A ** = distance to first drive aisle � -s Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 11/8/2010 Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue W 801 180 --)u I 101 101 84 I 53 -V 62 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 130 1305 104 1366 SimTraffic Delay 14.4 2.7 1.9 3.3 3.'. SimTraffic LOS B A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 97 18 104 Plaza Dr & West Site Dr (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <t> Volume 28 44 31 21 41 15 60 24 30 30 42 26 SimTraffic Delay 0.31 0.41 0.1 4.81 5.3 3.0 4.6 5.7 3.2 4.6 5.6 3.3 3. SimTraffic LOS A I A I A A I A A A A I A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 4 50 58 60 105 Plaza Dr & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <t> <T> <T> <T> Volume 41 47 17 1 391 1 8 1 1 1 1 31 SimTraffic Delay 1.6 0.5 0.3 0.31 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.2 0. SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A I A A A A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 10 7 ** = distance to first drive aisle � -s Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 11/8/2010 Figure 3 -5 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 No -Build Saturday Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound overall 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes F T> <- T _> <_ TTT 4 F TTT> Volume 88 15 79 25 24 67 53 1198 54 124 951 39 SimTraffic Delay 47.5 47.2 12.9 41.6 46.7 9.6 54.4 20.2 2.9 50.6 9.6 8.2 19.1 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D A D C A D A A B Storage 120 325 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1151 93 611 48 47 981 3521 72 1821 143 82 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes FF TT FF TT 4 E- TTTT 4 <- TTT Volume 98 62 62 172 45 94 43 1077 133 135 876 44 SimTraffic Delay 49.5 52.3 5.2 48.8 47.4 1.9 39.8 8.7 2.1 49.4 7.5 1.8 15.4 SimTraffic LOS D D A D D A D A A D A A B Storage 170 200 160 80 80 310 SimTraffic 95th Queue 90 63 1201 621 771 123 1 177 170 101 Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes <- TT> F TT> <T 4 <T 4 Volume 11 73 88 22 711 2 34 3 27 2 2 6 SimTraffic Delay 2.6 1.0 1.3 2.7 0.1 5.8 5.3 2.3 5.2 5.5 2.6 1.8 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A I A A A A A A Storage 50 50 120 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue I ill 3 161 45 1 36 20 22 102 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) lanes <- TT> F TT> <T> Volume 144 178 10 61 201F 78 5 11 5 66 21 109 SimTraffic Delay 7.9 5.6 3.3 7.7 8.51 2.7 15.81 7.41 2.4 16.1 18.0 2.7 7.1 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A I A B A I A B B I A A Storage 50 50 170 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 75 1 61 4 52 26 65 53 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> 1`TTT Volume 171 1138 125 ' 1057 SimTraffic Delay 13.2 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.9 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 107 3 10 104 Plaza Dr & West Site Dr (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <t> <t> <T> Volume 31 47 46 25 661 9 651 401 26 30 45 36 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.5 0.2 5.OF 5.41 3.6 4.91 5.81 3.3 3.7 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 6 52 67 63 105 Plaza Dr & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 261 431 32 2 44 1 13 1 1 1 1 44 SimTraffic Delay 1.81 0.5 0.3 1.3 0.3 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A I A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 14 12 8 "* = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 11/8/2010 4. BUILD SCENARIO Traffic volumes with the proposed Whole Foods in operation were developed using a traditional multi -step traffic forecast and analysis process, The steps in this process include: • Estimating the volume of new site - generated traffic (Trip Generation) • Anticipating the origin and destination of site - generated traffic (Trip Distribution) • Assigning site - generated traffic to the surrounding roadway network (Trip Assignment) • Adding the assigned site - generated traffic to the No -Build traffic volumes developed earlier to determine Build traffic volumes Trip Generation The trip generation rates utilized in this study are based on those documented in Trio Generation, 8th Edition, published by ITE. Trip Generation, 8`h Edition is considered the standard text in the traffic engineering profession for estimating gross trip generation potential. The overall change in trip generation potential of the site was forecast by subtracting the trip generation potential of the existing land uses to be removed from the trip generation potential of the proposed land use. Table 4 -1 summarizes the estimated trip generation potential of the land uses to be removed as part of the redevelopment. Table 4 -2 covers the trip generation potential of the proposed land use. Table 4 -1 Trip Generation Estimates — Existing Land Uses to be Removed Gross Trips Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday PM Peak Saturday Saturday Peak Enter Ex It Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exlt Fumiture Store 890 9,300 s.f. 24 24 2 2 23 23 5 4 Specialty Retail 814 25,700 s.f. 570 570 31 39 540 540 54 54 Total 594 594 33 41 563 563 59 58 Table 4 -2 Trip Generation Estimates— Proposed Land Use Gross Trips Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday PM Peak Saturday Peak Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit EnterT Exit Supermarket 850 32,300 s1 1,651 1 1.6511 1731 166 1 2,868 1 2,868 1 1791 172 Internal and pass -by trips were estimated using data from ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, 2 "a Edition, to the extent possible. Trip Generation Handbook, 2 °d Edition, is a companion text to Trip Generation, and is considered the standard text in Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 22 November 10, 2010 6 �A the traffic engineering profession for estimating internal and pass -by trips. Consistent, conservative assumptions were made where the Handbook data was incomplete. These assumptions were reviewed by City staff prior to initiation of the analysis. Full details are available in the appendix. Table 4 -3 summarizes the trip generation estimates of the redevelopment after accounting for internal and pass -by trip reductions. For the purposes of this study, internal trips are trips made from one Centennial Lakes land use to another that do not use the external roadway network. Pass -by trips are made by drivers that are already using the external roadway network, but choose to divert to the site (to pick up some groceries, for example) before continuing on their original route. Table 4 -3 includes three components: Gross, Driveway, and Net New trips: Gross trips reflect the baseline totals from Tables 4 -1 and 4 -2, before internal or pass -by trip reductions. Driveway trips reflect the amount of traffic actually using the site driveways (after the internal trip reduction). Because driveway trip totals include both pass -by and new trips, they are the totals used to develop the Build volume forecasts which are used for operational analysis. Net new trips reflect the amount of new traffic actually generated on nearby roads associated with the redevelopment. Table 4 -3 Trip Generation Estimates Existing Land Uses to be Removed + Proposed Land Use Gross. Drivewav and Net New Trips Land Use Weekday I PM Peak Saturday Saturday Peak Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit Gross Trios Fumiture Store -24 -24 -2 -2 -23 -23 -5 -4 Specialty Retail -570 -570 -31 -39 -540 -540 -54 -54 Supermarket 1,651 1,651 173 166 2,868 2,868 179 172 Total 19057 1,057 140 125 2,305 2,305 120 114 Driveway Trips (New Trips+ Pass -By Trips) Fumiture Store -23 -23 -2 -2 -22 -22 -5 -4 Specialty Retail -541 -541 -29 -37 -513 -513 -51 -51 Supermarket 1,56 8 1,568 164 158 2,725 2,725 170 163 Total 1,004 1,004 133 119 2,190 2,190 114 108 Net New Trios Fumiture Store -21 -21 -1 -1 -20 -20 -4 -4 Specialty Retail -487 487 -26 -33 462 -462 46 -46 Supermarket 1,098 1,098 105 101 1,907 1,907 119 114 Total 590 590 78 67 1,425 1,425 69 64 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 23 November 10, 2010 00 Trip Distribution The assumed trip distribution for new site - generated traffic is shown on Figure 4 -1. This distribution pattern was developed together with City staff based on observation of traffic patterns near the site, review of existing turning movement volumes, and knowledge of the approximate market area of the proposed land use. All pass -by trips were assumed to initiate from France Avenue. The directional split of these trips was based on existing traffic volumes: 50% northbound, 50% southbound for both the weekday PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Trip Assignment Site - generated traffic, distributed accordingly, was assigned to the roadway network. Figures 4 -2 and 4 -3, for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively, detail the change in turning movement volumes anticipated with redevelopment of the site. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in volume associated with pass -by trips. Pass -by trips were split between the Parklawn, Plaza Drive, and West 76' Street driveways. All trips were primarily assigned to the driveway that provided the shortest trip and/or most direct route. Further details on routing assumptions are available in the appendix. Traffic Volumes The peak hour turning movement volumes for the Build scenario developed by adding the trip assignment volumes to the No -Build volumes discussed in Section 3 are presented on Figures 4 -4 and 4 -5, for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively. Projected changes in ADT volumes, Build vs. No- Build, are as follows: • France Avenue (North of Site): +350 / +1.2% • France Avenue (South of Site): +470 / +1.6% • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): +90 / +2.5% • West 76h Street (East of Site): +140 / +1.5% The resulting Build ADT volumes (and change compared with Existing conditions) are as follows: • France Avenue (North of Site): 29,430 ( +930 / +33%) • France Avenue (South of Site): 29,600 ( +1,100 / +3.9 %) • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): 3,680 ( +180 / +5.1 %) • West 76`h Street (East of Site): 9,440 ( +340 / +2.2 %) Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 24 November 10, 2010 ��I Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Figure 4 -1 Trip Distribution II II II 30% 11 II II I1 II II I I. II 11 11 1 II 0% II , I1 II II 11 11 el° II , II t - n vB II II 11 d.3%6 I, Ave Ave II 11 ` II Site It 111 II III , It rrl ` 111 ` VIII 111 O O 1 1 1 IIIIII m PIaL D rp w / / 1.4 I I III 111 111 I11 I III I11 I 111 / III $1 ® 11 I Q D 11 II I 1111 W OI St 1 1111 . 11 °PPP II IIII 11 n11 0% n 1111 1 1111 II IIII 11 1111 0% stwood 7 U/7l /LI Figure 4 -2 Go TN-2 g �, <-15 e 2-4 N T �' parklawn Av 5'� � Ln. U) coo CD Q n NIL V N C (3 L N `0 -0 r o+ N r-, (--Q F� T r CO d. N CO I N +O CO d �i M I -0 T <-4 .L 0 O,fj T g W 76th St M CO m Q m U C (O L U- Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood ly Plaza Dr 0 N U N N W UU U Q 0 �-9 �0 463 PM Trip Assignment Parklawn W 76th St 10/27/2010 Not to Scale Figure 4 -3 rl-2 g 3, NM 13 e 2---> 2---> N T �' parklawn Av �`�' clN. cn m Q n m V NN C CO L U- 0 -0 �J r (-0 N � Q a O `O E-4 Y m m V c ca L LL vy Plaza Dr 54 OTO cc I cc Q1 ID CO CO i>- w T W 76th St CV Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood CO V V) Q Cd Saturday Trip Assignment Parklawn 1 9 f g y W 76th St tTW 10/27/2010 Not to Scale Figure 4-4 I I Turning Movement Volumes 2013 Build - PM a� r a� ►E r-241 Nom E-1g6 CO a� Q a� U c IT U, 263 T I' W 76th St CDo a� U) cc W UJy U� V Q 7 N to BOG 6 8 j 10 lg� V6 W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 7UIZ -11 U7U Westwood Not to Scale x.1109 ,� 25 Parklawn N - ti (O— o 4-426 OD 04 X117 0 Ave Parkaw� 46-4 Dn- u-) ,q 90-,A N. cro (D n U U NN C L UL LO r`-15 F`-1 CO X177 -4 v o ,�~ T "' X41 21 (--39 �, 1 Plaza Dr 91 T C 42 T 0D ti COO 45—) cO ccn v) 47—� c 31—A 17�, a� r a� ►E r-241 Nom E-1g6 CO a� Q a� U c IT U, 263 T I' W 76th St CDo a� U) cc W UJy U� V Q 7 N to BOG 6 8 j 10 lg� V6 W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 7UIZ -11 U7U Westwood Not to Scale Figure 4 -5 Turning Movement Volume: ZuIs BUM - U) (D Q m c co u_ Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood A4 1012712010 Not to Scale Parklawn Ave x-69 rn N cO T F-24 37 % J� 88 par klawn Ave 33.y cA 17-4 7q— Lr- LO N n Q ANN U c (o U- r` F` -213 ,�~ T M 25 V .� X24 Plaza Dr 8 T(' CO 27 T� `r° 00 48—> o v 43-� 46-2�, 32� 0 0 °? N N N N W UU U X94 LO CO � E-,49 207 1 102 T r W 76th St 2�1 62—> 62--,A vorMi 1g )4 W 76th St U) (D Q m c co u_ Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood A4 1012712010 Not to Scale Traffic Operations Traffic operational analyses were conducted for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hour conditions for the Build scenario, similar to process for the No- Build scenario. Overall results of the analysis are shown in Table 4 -4. A comparison with the Existing and No -Build scenarios is provided in Table 4 -5. Further details on Build operational analysis results are provided in Figures 4 -6, 4 -7, and the appendix. Table 4-4 2013 Build Traffic Operations Intersection PM Saturday LOS Delay LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 26 C 21 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 30 B 16 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access* A/A 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 8 A 7 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/C 4 A/C 4 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 4 A/A 5 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: * Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. PM Peak Hour Overall intersection LOS remains acceptable throughout the study area for Build conditions, with little change from No -Build conditions. The two movements with oversize 95th percentile queues noted under Existing conditions remain the only two movements in the study area with oversize queues. No significant change in the length of these queues is forecast. 95`h percentile queues at the internal site intersections remain at three vehicles or less. Saturday Peak Hour LOS throughout the study area remains acceptable. The oversize 95th percentile queues at the movement noted under existing conditions remain stable. No additional movements experience oversize 95th percentile queuing. Similar to the PM peak hour, 95th queues at the internal site intersections remain at three vehicles or less. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 30 November 10, 2010 hul Table 4 -5 Traffic ODerations — Three Scenario Comparison Intersection 2010 Existing 2013 No-Bulld 2013 Build PM I Saturday PM Saturday PM I Saturday LOS IDelayl LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delayl LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 1 24 1 B 18 C 25 B 19 C 26 C 21 France Are. & W. 76th St. C 29 B 15 C 29 B 15 C 30 B 16 Parklawn Are. & Site Access' A/B 2 A/A 2 A/B 2 A/A 2 A/A 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 8 A. 6 A 7 A 7 A 8 A 7 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/C 4 A/B 3 A/B 4 A/B 3 A/C 4 A/C 4 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.' A/A 3 A/A 4 A/A 3 A/A 4 A/A 4 A/A 5 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.' A/A 1 A/A 1 A/A 1 A/A 1 1 A/A 1 1 A/A 1- Notes: ' Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 31 November 10, 2010 lm 4 Figure 4 -6 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 Build PM Operational Analysis Results Node lintersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overa 8: 30] 30: Lanes F T> F T F TTT - E TTT> SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 Volume 117 46 90 90 42 1261 57 1358 42 207 1172 86 SimTraffic Delay 37.6 47.6 21.5 41.8 45.9 13.91 55.8 23.6 3.0 48.8 22.8 23.5 26.3 SimTraffic LOS D D C D D B E -C A D C C C Storage SimTraffic Delay 120 325 18.2 410 2.1 SimTraffic 95th Queue 140 146 107 59 86 95 416 146 2421 333 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) A A A Lanes E E- TT 4 1 F TTTT F TTT Volume 244 483 269 263 186 2411 80 9651 103 144 1083 128 104 SimTraffic Delay 70.9 60.0 10.0 61.7 44.7 2.61 39.6 8.8 1.9 73.3 24.4 2.6 29.5 SimTraffic LOS E E A E D A D A A E C A C Storage 170 0.41 200 160 5.91 80 5.5 5.9 80 5.4 6.81 1 310 3.9 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 2181 1 3071 183 1881 127 59 135 103 A 216 3151 58 I A Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Storage Lanes E- TT> F TT> <T 4 <T 80 Volume 26 112 140 25 1091 7 56 2 28 47 5 81 SimTraffic Delay 2.8 1.3 1.5 3.9 0.21 1 6.6 8.0 2.6 6.0 7.0 3.0 2.4 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A I A A A A A A A A Storage 50 SimTraffic LOS 50 A 120 ** A I A I A A SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 181 9 30 I A 48 1 38 47 1 47 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) SimTraffic 95th Queue 18 1 Lanes F TT> F TT> <t> Volume. 87 618 10 10 500 78 57 21 48 45 2 134 SimTraffic Delay 11.5 8.1 7.3 9.0 7.3 3.9 20.6 22.8 9.1 20.3 25.2 5.0 8.4 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A A C C I A C C A A ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 A-0 11/8/2010 Storage I bul wu - SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 80 204 11 109 88 61 76 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes -i TTTT> T.TTT Volume 177 1278 168 1354 SimTraffic Delay 18.2 2.9 2.1 3.3 3.9 SimTraffic LOS C A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 128 8 104 Plaza Dr & West Site Dr (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <t> <T> Volume 91 45 31 211 411 15 60 341 30 30 941 74 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.41 0.2 4.8 5.91 3.5 5.5 5.9 3.5 5.4 6.81 4.4 3.9 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A i A I A A A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 8 51 69 80 105 Plaza Dr & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <t> Volume 42 471 17 11 391 1 8 11 1 1 11 31 SimTraffic Delay 1.5 0.6 0.3 1.3 0.31 0.1 1.21 0.11 0.1 1.11 0.11 0.2 O.E SimTraffic LOS A A I A A I A I A A I A I A A I A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 18 1 SO 9 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 A-0 11/8/2010 Figure 4 -7 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 Build Saturday Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes <- T> <- T 4 Volume 88 17 79 37 24 69 55 1215 54 167 929 39 SimTraffic Delay 43.6 44.5 12.2 41.2 46.9 10.9 57.7 23.1 3.1 52.9 9.2 8.4 20.9 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D B E C A D A A C Storage 120 325 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1171 91 541 49 541 891 3541 42 2261 145 82 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes < F TT E-F TT F TTTT F TTT 4 Volume 102 62 62 207 49 94 43 1105 133 135 866 45 SimTraff ic Delay 47.6 53.7 5.2 47.3 46.8 1.7 38.3 9.0 2.1 52.8 8.2 1.8 16.1 SimTraffic LOS D D A D D A D A A D A A B Storage 170 200 160 80 80 310 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 951 611 1331 631 841 123 177 153 101 Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes E- TT> <- Volume 11 73 133 28 71 2 48 3 32 2 2 6 SimTraffic Delay 2.7 1.0 1.5 3.9 0.1 5.6 8.4 2.4 4.1 6.1 2.2 1.9 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage 50 50 120 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 121 6 281 47 1 38 21 1 18 102 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) Lanes <- T T> F T T> <T> Volume 144 178 10 6 201 86 5 11 5 73 21 149 SimTraffic Delay 8.1 6.5 3.4 5.9 8.9 2.3 17.5 8.1 2.1 16.0 26.8 3.0 7.1 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A B A I A B C I A A Storage 50 50 170 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 771 56 61 53 21 70 62 103 Plaza Or & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 213 1116 180 1047 SimTraffic Delay 16.6 3.5 2.2 1.9 1 3.8 SimTraffic LOS C A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 133 1 83 104 Plaza Or & West Site Or (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <t> <T> <t> Volume 85 481 46 25 661 9 65 48 26 30 921 77 SimTraffic Delay 0.4 0.6 0.2 6.9 7.11 4.0 8.5 6.1 4.9 6.0 7.7 5.3 4.9 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A I A A A A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 14 62 78 88 105 Plaza Or & East Site or (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 27 43 32 21 441 1 13 11 1 1 11 44 SimTraffic Delay 1.7 0.6 0.4 1.9 0.31 0.1 1.91 0.11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A I A I A A I A I A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 13 14 7 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 �� �% 11/8/2010 5. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT The goal of Travel Demand Management (TDM) is to reduce the peak hour traffic demand generated by the site by managing and minimizing the vehicle trips generated by the development. This section covers aspects of the site that will help foster travel demand management in three categories, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit. This section also notes specific travel demand management strategies that could be implemented by the owner /end user /property manager /etc. of the site to further reduce peak hour travel demand. Pedestrian Situated in the heart of Edina's Southdale commerical district, the site location is primarily automobile- focused. Those choosing to access the site via the pedestrian mode are likely to originate from the multi - family housing land uses located immediately east of the site. Despite the low volume of pedestrian trips anticipated, the site has been designed to fully accommodate accessibility by pedestrians. Sidewalk access is currently available from all corners of the site. This connectivity will be preserved and enhanced as shown on the Pedestrian Connectivity Plan, Figure 5 -1. Bicycle Both employees and customers are able to access shops within the Centennial Lakes shopping center by bicycle. In addition to the pedestrian sidewalk system, the addition of bike racks at one or more convenient locations on site is suggested to accommodate bicycle users. Figure 5 -1 notes one such potential location. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 34 I November 10, 2010 FIGURE 5 -1 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION m D< T Z m m 8 O iIIAI VIA III k7 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED N T N.T.S. w Westwood Transit Existing bus service to the Site is provided by Metro Transit Route 6. Route 6 provides local all -day service seven days per week along France Avenue between Downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota (Downtown), the site, and parts of Bloomington to the south. Route 6 is characterized as a "Hi- Frequency" route by Metro Transit; busses run every 5 -10 minutes during peak periods with service every 30 minutes off -peak. Four additional bus routes provide service within a three -block radius, Routes 539, 540, 578, and 587. These routes all provide limited weekday only service. Figure 5 -2 shows the path of these routes near the site. The location of three the bus stops available on the perimeter of the site are highlighted. Figure 5 -2 Existing Bus Routes and Whole Foods edevelopmen Site r Kin a Edina 1 Source: Metro Transit Strategies suggested to encourage transit use by employees are outlined below. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Traf is Impact Analysis page 36 November 10, 2010Page 36 November 10, 2010 A73 TDM Strategies This section provides suggestions for specific travel demand management strategies that could be implemented by the end of the site. In choosing the implement and maintain these strategies, the end user would be assisting Edina in achieving their goal of enhancing the local transportation system by lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to achieve a balance in the needs of all users of the transportation system. General 1. Minimize truck and/or service deliveries during Monday — Friday peak hour traffic times. 2. Provide schedule flexibility to allow employees to coordinate their shifts with the appropriate transit schedule. 3. Include alternative transportation mode information in new employee orientation materials. Pedestrian 1. Rebuild sidewalks impacted by construction with ADA- compliant tactile truncated dome curb ramps, facilitating use by all pedestrians. 2. Maintain clear and well -lit sidewalks along the site perimeter. Bich 1. Provide conveniently located bicycle racks for customer and employee use. 2. Promote employee bicycle use by posting and regularly maps of the regional bike trail system on an employee common space bulletin board. Transit 1. Include in a display of commuter information in employee common areas. Include information on Metro Transit schedules and stop locations for routes serving the nearby area. 2. Consider offering employees the ability to purchase transit passes through a payroll deduction system. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 37 November 10, 2010 V1 6. RECOMMENDATIONS • Two movements experience 95th percentile queues longer than available storage bay lengths under existing conditions (eastbound left at France/Parklawn and eastbound left at West 76th /Site Access). The magnitude by which these queues exceed the available storage bays is small at roughly one to two car lengths. The addition of traffic due to background growth, infill of existing Centennial Lakes vacancies and proposed Whole Foods redevelopment does not increase queuing on these movements. Extension of turn bays to accommodate 1 to 2 additional vehicles is not practical from a cost/benefit perspective; therefore no mitigation is recommended. • The Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies covered in Section 5 should be implemented and maintained to provide ongoing reduction in the amount of peak hour traffic generated by the site. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 38 November 10, 2010 OT I 6. APPENDIX A. Traffic Count Data 1. Year 2010 PM and Saturday Turning Movement Counts 2. Year 2007 Weekday Midday and PM Turning Movement Counts 3. Estimate of 2010 Turning Movements at Gallagher and Minnesota B. Traffic Estimate Details 1. Trip Generation Estimate Details — Full Occupancy of Centennial Lakes 2. Trip Generation Estimate Details — Existing Uses to Be Removed 3. Trip Generation Estimate Details — Proposed Uses 4. Trip Assignment — Full Occupancy of Centennial Lakes Only 5. Trip Assignment — Existing Uses to Be Removed Only 6. Trip Assignment — Proposed Uses Only 7. Roster of Existing Centennial Lakes Vacancies C. Synchro and SimTraffic Operational Analysis Result Worksheets 1. 2010 Existing PM Peak Hour 2. 2010 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour 3. 2013 No -Build PM Peak Hour 4. 2013 No -Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour 5. 2013 Build PM Peak Hour 6. 2013 Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 39 November 10, 2010 476 I .J I I u r� Z n m Qm CD Uc Q= 0 CC- rr1�IJ,v ✓� 1 i CC- rr1�IJ,v ✓� 1 11 i i i ML n R Z n m Qm LQ O Q LZ I n� `rr1�1 J A 1) 1 v i i i i I n� `rr1�1 J A 1) 1 v i 1� i u r� Z 0 M jz Q m LLJ O Q= 0 f r11�� J�v 1 Cary Teaaue From: Jack Sullivan Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:59 AM To: Thomas A. Bonneville (TABonneville @aol.com) Cc: Michael Schroeder (Mschroeder23 @msn.com); Sharon Allison (SAllison @ci.edina.mn.us); Wayne D. Houle P.E. (whoule @ci.edina.mn.us); Cary Teague Subject: FW: ETC proposal by Whole Foods Tom, I have forwarded your email on to Michael Schroeder. An overview of the discussion at the ETC meeting will be in the draft meeting minutes that the Planning Commission will receive. Regards, Jack ,,: ,. Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -0445 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 �'; isullivanCDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com q@ ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business _We've moved! The Edina Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility is located at 7450 Metro Blvd. Hours are 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. From: TABonneville @aol.com [mailto:TABonneville @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 7:18 PM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Fwd: ETC proposal by Whole Foods Jack, I have Mike's email wrong, would you kindly .pass this on to him? From: TABonneville @aol.com To: mschoeder23 @msn.com, jsullivan @ci.edina.mn.US CC: tabonneville @aol.com Sent: 11/21/2010 7:10:20 P.M. Central Standard Time Subj: ETC proposal by Whole Foods While I was alone in voting to deny Whole Foods proposal as stated in the ETC meeting this week, I feel that the project does, in fact, adversely affect the adjacent roadway system. I wish that my comments will be carried forward as a minority position, to the Planning Commission and City Council 1. All trucks coming to the dock position must pass the dock in front of Ultimate Electronics, coming to a full stop, then backing up and left (most difficult truck turn) into the WF dock. Most importantly are the WB -65 trucks or larger (semi trucks with a 53' trailer and 12' or more tracker). These truck will use all of the front driveway duping the entry from Park lawn Blvd, and again while maneuvering to get into the dock. At 2100 vehicles per day, autos entering and leaving the site, all trying to use this most appropriate and convenient access point, will be held up inside the site and on the roadway, blocking at least one lane of Park lawn in both eastbound and westbound facing direction of flow. 2. While a truck of the larger size like the WB-65 and even some smaller may be exiting the site at the Park lane access, the driver will encounter the median turning left toward France Ave, That median currently has too long a projection easterly, so will probably need to be cut off so the rear trailer wheels do not drive over the curbs. I have the tracking layouts for truck wheelbase sizes including the 42.50, 45,62, size trucks with trailers and with single axle design and their complex turning required. Autocadd and Microstation will now also be capable of accurately showing the tracks for backing up and going forward. This should be a required drawing for all commercial design location site plans to the City of Edina before it goes to the ETC or staff. 3. Vehicle right turn entry into the Park lawn access is heavy and the site plan shows no turn stacking, so the backup in #1 above will in fact, occur. There is enough space behind the store to allow a lane for turning. Not having it is another negative impact on the Edina Street System. If the City still desires to have these movements, then a drawing showing the right and left inbound turns leading to a stop on the fire lane plus a second drawing showing the backing up movements into each of the docks on the WF store. A last drawing should show the exiting from the dock to the access point and left to the Park lawn route to France. No trucks should be allowed to use the France or 76th Street access points leading to the WF docks. No receiving though the front doors shall be allowed. No truck storage on -site beyond the dock positions should be allowed. WSB seems to overrule the City by stating that the project does not adversely affect the roadway system... before ETC, EPC or ECC has seen the plans. Submitted respectfully, Thomas A. Bonneville ETC Commissioner Jackie Hoogenakker From: Nancy Johnson <nrjl @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, November 22, 201{0 2:56 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Project I think having a whole foods market in Centennial lakes Plaza would be a great compliment to the area and will give us fresh, organic and wholesome food and produce that we greatly need. The farmers market this summer was a great success and having a store that continually has organically or homegrown foods is a plus. I already go to the one on Excelsior but don't go as often as I would like because of the distance. I have also emailed the project Director to let him know that I am all for this improvement to the quality of life in Edina. Good luck and I look forward to the opening of the store. Nancy Johnson, 4100 Parklawn Ave. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Irene Larson <ikslarson @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 22, 20101120 AM To: Jackie �Hoogenakker Subject: Fwd: 2010.0007.10a ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Irene Larson <ikslarsonkgmail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:05 AM Subject: 2010.0007.10a To: jhoogenakkergcl.edina.mn.us In response to the Edina Planning Commission notice. re: Whole Foods grocery store at Centennial Lakes Plaza. I do not think that we need another grocery store in this area. We already have Byerly - Lunds, a Super Target and a very good Cub Foods. We also have Rainbow a short distance away in Bloomington. It would add to traffic congestion with the two levels of the Plaza and Parklawn which is already difficult enough.. Also, I would really miss the lovely Storables and Thomasville. Please do not put Whole Foods in there. Thank you for your consideration. Irene Larson 7500 York Ave. So. 4703 Edina, Mn 5543-5 Jackie Hoogenakker .-rom: bradley.winter @comcast.net Sent: Saturday, November 20,, 2010 4:31 PKV To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Development Plan - Comments I am in favor of some competition for the other high -end grocers in the area. Brad Winter & Amy Wiechmann 810 Coventry Place Edina, MN. 55435 Regards, Brad 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Kristen Larson <krislars @yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, November-20, 2010 8:4-IPM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Proposal In response to the Public Hearing Notice of the Whole Food proposal: Although Whole Foods would be the fourth grocery store in close distance (accompanying Byerly's, Super Target & Cub), I would welcome Whole Foods in my neighborhood. I find their foods selections to be unique by offering more organic and natural foods and a variety of ready to eat meals. This is something the other grocery stores do not provide to the same extent. I have gone to other Whole Foods stores for breakfast to eat in one of their onsite booths and would love to be able to do that right in my neighborhood! Even better if they would open before 8am. :) I also support Whole Foods in the proposed location, since it would replace Storables. Within blocks there is a Container Store, which, to me, makes Storables unnecessary. Kristen Larson Resident of Edinborough Condos Jackie Hoogenakker From: Reid -Haase <reidhaase @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 11:32 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Whole Foods store at 7401 France Ave So. Dear Edina Planning Department, I would like to voice my support for the proposed Whole Foods Store to be located at 7401 France Ave So. I have been a consumer of products that are carried by this grocery chain and have found it necessary to make trips outside of the Edina shopping area on France to purchase products unavailable at Byerly's, Target, Cub foods or other nearby grocery stores. Given that the proposed structure would meet appropriate codes, setbacks, signage, etc. and not adversely hinder traffic in the area, I would think this would be an excellent addition to the Centennial Lakes shopping area. My opinion is that the Centennial Lakes 'strip mall' has lacked as stronger anchor store presence. Whole foods would fulfill that purpose and undoubtedly be welcomed by the other retail occupants in the complex. Thank you for including my comments and support during the Edina Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for December 1, 2010 at 7pm. Sincerely, Reid Haase (resident and property owner) 7350 York Ave. So, #207 Edina, MN 55435 o e MEMORANDUM — Plan Review •,�• ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: December 1, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Updated Memo Centennial Lakes Plaza — Whole Foods 7401 France Avenue South Engineering received updated truck turning movements for the delivery vehicles for the above project. The original turning movements did not affect the entrance and entrance island from Parklawn Avenue into the site. The new turning movements do affect the geometry of this entrance. Changes to the design of this entrance to accommodate the largest possible delivery vehicle (WB -67) include the following: • Shorten the south end of the of the entrance island. • Widen the entrance into the site to accommodate two traffic lanes. • Submit internal restriping plan to show lane usage from Parklawn Avenue to the crosswalk. • Indicate crosswalk as a different pavement such as concrete or use of DuraTherm — an integrated asphalt marking system for crosswalks similar to the crosswalk by City Hall see their web site: hftp• //www integratedpavina com/ our - products /duratherm /index.cfm. There has been some discussion regarding the sidewalk extension' along France Avenue. Per City Code this is an allowed request to make by Staff. The sidewalk could be installed between the existing boulevard trees and the parking lot to minimize disturbance to the trees. Detailed plans will need to be submitted with the permit drawings if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding memo. Thanks GAEnglneer ng \GenerallF Streets 17401 n 7601 Centennial Lakes Plaza%Whole FoodsWpprovaR20101201 updated review of 7401 France Avenue South Whole Foods.docx i P ✓/ __�35ESgPC�N \ � r � WA o N 1 15.00 53.00 �('• 300 45.50 0.00 9 00 19.50 wa -67 feel P Trotter Width :8.00 Leek to Lek Tme : 8.0 Trailer Width : 8.50 Slaerlrrp Mgla : 28.4 \ Troclor Track :8.00 Articulating Mgle :75.0 7r liar Track V 9.50 m LOAOINO DOCK FF 852.2 RKET Nd dt y_ A \ E rn ry® J G II L BL Q IO N n .00l 15 ellGs r � WA r y, 15.00 53.00 j,� 3 0 4550 L.00 19.50 /WB -67 feet P Troctor Mdth : &00 Lock to Lock Tlme : 6.0 Troler Vrdlh :8.50 Slau&g Angle :28.4 `0 • \ Tractor .50 Trock : 8.00 Arttculatfng A.& : 75.0 �A$_ ' O � •• Troller Track :8 \ LOADING DOCK , FF 852.2 G o� — ARKET �.' E AL ,�c� G II L t ��I�►�► II Illla �i 0 1 WA 4RKET C LOADING DOCK FF 852.2 M- oil gb� J� O mm m C \ \�v lo c L BL t A r o r \ 1 15.00 53.00 F + 300 45.50 0.00 0 .00 tgso W6 -67 feet ..;• Tractor Width Trailer Width : 8.00 Lock to Look Time :8.50 Steering Anglo : 8.0 :28.4 + �;.: = • _• .�,+� '' Tractor Track \ Trdler Track : 8.00 Arliculattng Mgle : 8.50 :78.0 M- oil gb� J� O mm m C \ \�v lo c L BL t A r o o e t4 \" lease REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. J. From: Susan Howl Human Services Coordinator ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: SELECT DATE FOR 2011 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION ACTION REQUESTED: That the Council"select one of the following dates for the 2011 Volunteer Recognition Reception at Edinborough Park at 5:00 PM. Monday, April 11th Wednesday, April 20th Thursday, April 28th NOTE: These dates do not conflict with evening advisory group meetings, spring break or holy days. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: • Spring break in 2011 is Monday, March 28th, through Friday, April 1St. • Passover in 2011 begins -at sundown on Monday, April 18tH • Easter Sunday in 2011 is April 24tH • The 2010 Reception was held on Thursday, April 29tH ofle in \fie REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. K. From: ' Susan Howl Human Services Coordinator ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: SELECT DATE FOR 2011 ANNUAL BOARD & COMMISSION MEETING ACTION REQUESTED: That the Council select one of the following dates for the 2011 Annual Board & Commission Meeting to be held at Centennial Lakes at 5:00 PM. • Monday, March 21St 161i • Wednesday, March 23`d NOTE: These are the two dates in March that do not conflict with evening advisory group meetings, Centrum Building warming house activities or spring break. . INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This is a dinner meeting to introduce /recognize incoming and retiring board and commission members. • The event is typically held at the Braemar Clubhouse every other year. Due to a scheduling conflict, Braemar was the location for the past two years — held on March 10th in 2010. • Spring break in 2011 is Monday, March 28th, through Friday, April 1St • Passover in 2011 begins at sundown on Monday, April 18th. • Easter Sunday in 2011 is April 24th :q1 J0 � REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.L.1. From: Cary Teague ❑ Action Planning Director ❑ Discussion ® Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Council discussion to take place 12 -21- 10) — Revised draft of Ordinance 2010 -17 regarding Non - Conforming Buildings and Uses and Additions To Or Replacement of Homes With A First Floor Elevation Over One Foot Above the Existing Homes First Floor Elevation. ACTION REQUESTED: No action necessary. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Per the request of the City Council, attached is a draft of Ordinance 2010 -17. The Ordinance has been revised to include changes recommended by the City Council (new text is in blue) at the November 16, 2010 meeting. Input was also obtained from the city engineer, and Bob Obermeyer of Barr Engineering and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Mr. Obermeyer believes that the cost for a determination of ground water issues should be in the range of $1,000 to $1,500. Discussion on this item is intended to take place at the December 21, 2010 City Council meeting. Mr. Obermeyer will be in attendance at the December 21St meeting to provide expertise, and answer questions. ORDINANCE 2010 -17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE CONCERNING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES AND ADDITIONS TO OR REPLACEMENT OF HOMES WITH A FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OVER ONE FOOT ABOVE THE EXISTING HOMES FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Section 850.07 Subd. 20. A. is repealed: A. Non GenfeFming uses. Any men -r.,enferming use may GGAtinue, pFevided 7 it shall not he renlaGed with any other nonnonfor inn � �c�e• i 3. it shall Rot be Fesumed of at is diGGORtiRued fGF eRe yeaF OF lengeFj and 4.. if at GGAtinued and FeplaGed with ice no non Section 2. Section 850.07 Subd. 20.B is amended to read: B. Nonconforming Buildings. 1. Alterations, Additions and Enlargements. a. A nonconforming building, other than a single dwelling unit building, shall not be added to or enlarged, in any manner, or subjected to an alteration involving fifty percent (50 %) or more of the gross floor area of the building, or fifty percent (50 %) or more of the exterior wall area of the building, unless such non - conforming building, including all additions, alterations and enlargements, shall conform to all of the restrictions of the district in which it is located. The percentage of the gross floor area or exterior wall area Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX subjected to an alteration shall be the aggregate percentage for any consecutive three (3) year period. b. a non GGFIfGFMiRg single dwelling unit building shall not be inte living area unless all c „nh additions enlaFgemen4 and building, - b. -Alternate setbacks. An addition to a single dwelling unit ' building with a nonconforming setback, or an addition to a structure accessory to a single dwelling unit building with a nonconforming setback, maybe constructed, within the existing nonconforming setback, which is the 'shortest distance from the applicable lot line to the; I structure, subject to the following limitations L - the addition shall not exceed the existing square jfootage encroachment into the nonconform_in_g `setback or two hundred_ (200)_ square feet,' whichever is less; and ii. the addition may only be constructed on the same ;floor as the existing encroachment into the nonconforming setback 2. Nonconformitiesl Repair-s, Maintenanne aFid Remodeling. Nef:�_ GGRfGFMin9 buildings may be FepaiFed,- maint-ained- and iemrrodecieed -to- an.ee)deent and in a- FnanneF Whinh doe not violate the . 'Except as provided, in Section 850.21, any nonconformity, including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the" adoption of an additional control under this Chapter, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration_ maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion,! except as specifically provided in this Chapter, unless.; a. the nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued_ for a period of more than one (1) year; or Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading XXXX b. any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other ;peril to the extent of greater than fifty percent (50 %) of fits market value, and no building permit has been, applied for within one hundred eighty (180) days of when the property is damaged. In these cases, the city, ,of Edina may impose reasonable conditions upon a, ±building permit in order to mitigate any newly created Jmpact on adjacent property. Any subsequent use or' ;occupancy of the land or premises shall be a conforming use or occupancy.; Section 3. Section 850.11 (R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District) Subd. 2. Conditional Uses; is amended to add the following: I. 'fi st' replacement single floor elevation of more than one ( dwelling ) foot above buildings ' he ex existing first. t floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions; to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one or more of the first three (3) conditions listed below, and always meet condition four (4) 1. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent ;necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX my Ri M110 I'll WWW OR 0A M Section 3. Section 850.11 (R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District) Subd. 2. Conditional Uses; is amended to add the following: I. 'fi st' replacement single floor elevation of more than one ( dwelling ) foot above buildings ' he ex existing first. t floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions; to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one or more of the first three (3) conditions listed below, and always meet condition four (4) 1. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent ;necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan; or 2. - The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect dwelling f ground, intrusion. Existing and potential ground water eleva tions, ions; ;shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326 or a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Determinations shall, , . Studies, analyses and, computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow thorough review and approval; or 3 The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet State Building' (Code, City of Edina Code, or other statutory requirements; and 4 An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the' new structure or addition fits the character of the, neighborhood in height, mass and scale! Section 4. Section 850.11 Subd. .7. H. is hereby amended as follows: H. Additions to or replacement of,;single- fami' dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to; or rebuilds of existing single family dwellings dwelling unit buildings' and buildings.containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split level dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the new first floor or. entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. Subject o- Section 850.11 Subd. 2. I. the first floor e - more than one (1) foot. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply to all single ilin— dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units including units in the flood plain overlay district. Any deviation from the requirements of this paragraph shall require a variance. Section 5. Section 850.12 (R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District) is amended to add the, following: Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX, Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. A. Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two (2) dwelling units with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to or replacements of single or two dwelling unit buildings must meet one; or more of the first three (3) conditions listed below, and always meet condition four (4); 1. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resource' Management Plan; or 2. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. Existing and potential ground water elevations shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326 or a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Determinations shall under-taken by a "Gensed design professional who shall . Studies, analyses and 'computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow (thorough review and approval; or 3. - The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet State Building Code City of Edina Code, or other statutory requirements; and 4. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in height, mass and scale. Section 6. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 2010. 326.02 LICENSURE OR CERTIFICATION. Subdivision 1. Licensure or certification mandatory. In order to safeguard life, health, and property, and to promote the public welfare, any person in either public or private capacity practicing, or offering to practice, architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, or professional geoscience, or using the title certified interior designer in this state, either as an individual, a copartner, or as agent of another, shall be licensed or certified as hereinafter provided. It shall be unlawful for any person to practice, or to offer to practice, in this state, architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, or professional geoscience, or to use the title certified interior designer, or to solicit or to contract to furnish work within the terms of sections 326.02 to 326.15, or to use in connection with the person's name, or to otherwise assume, use or advertise any title or description tending to convey the impression that the person is an architect, professional engineer (hereinafter called engineer), land surveyor, landscape architect, professional geoscientist (hereinafter called geoscientist), or certified interior designer, unless such person is qualified by licensure or certification under sections 326.02 to 326.15. This subdivision does not preclude an individual who retired from one of the professions listed in this subdivision from using the designation architect, professional engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, professional geoscientist, or certified interior designer as long as the designation is preceded by the word "retired" and the individual was licensed or certified in the designated profession in the state of Minnesota on the date the individual retired from the designated profession and the individual's license or certification was not subsequently revoked by the Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design. Subd. 2. Practice of architecture. Any person shall be deemed to be practicing architecture, within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15, who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any professional service, such as planning, design, or supervision of construction for the purpose of assuring compliance with specifications and design, in connection with any private or public buildings, structures or projects, or the equipment or utilities thereof, or the accessories thereto, wherein the safeguarding of life, health, or property is concerned or involved, when such professional service requires the application of the art and science of construction based upon the principles of mathematics, aesthetics, and the physical sciences, acquired by education or training, and by experience. For the purposes of this subdivision "supervision" is a professional service as distinguished from superintending of construction and means the performance or the supervision thereof, of reasonable and ordinary on the site observations to determine that the construction is in substantial compliance with the approved drawings, plans and specifications. Subd. 3. Practice of professional engineering. Any person shall be deemed to be practicing professional engineering within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15 who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any technical professional service, such as planning, design or observation of construction for the purpose of assuring compliance with specifications and design, in connection with any public or private structures, buildings, utilities, machines, equipment, processes, works, or projects wherein the public welfare or the safeguarding of life, health, or property is concerned or involved, when such professional service requires the application of the principles of mathematics and the physical and applied engineering sciences, acquired by education or training, and by experience. Subd. 3a. Practice of professional geoscience. A person is considered to be practicing professional geoscience within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15 who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any technical professional services, the adequate performance of which requires professional geoscience education, training, and experience in the application of special knowledge of the mathematical, physical, chemical, biological, and earth sciences to such services or creative work as consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning, mapping, and inspection of geoscientific work and its responsible supervision. A person is considered to practice or offer to practice professional geoscience, within the meaning and intent of sections 326.02 to 326.15 who practices any of the geoscience disciplines defined by the board; who by verbal claim, sign, advertisement, letterhead, card, or in any other way represents oneself to be a professional geoscientist; through the use of some other title implies that the person is a professional geoscientist; or who presents oneself as able to perform or who does perform any geoscience services or that constitutes the practice of a professional geoscience discipline as defined by the board. "Geoscience" means the science which includes treatment of the earth and its origin and history; the investigation, measurement or sampling, of the earth's constituent rocks, natural and induced fields of force, minerals, fossils, solids, soils, fluids including surface and underground waters, gases, and other materials; and the study, interpretation, and analysis of the natural agents, forces, and processes which cause changes in the earth. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prevent a professional engineer, as defined in sections 326.02 to 326.15, from acquiring engineering data involving soil, rock, groundwater, and other earth materials; evaluating physical and chemical properties of soil, rock, groundwater, and other earth materials for engineering; and from utilizing these data for analysis, design, and construction. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to permit a professional geoscientist to engage in the practice of professional engineering, architecture, landscape architecture, or land surveying or to use the title "certified interior design" as those terms are defined in this section. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to regulate persons who take soil samples for the purpose of providing recommendations on crop production. Subd. 4. Practice of land surveying. Land surveying means the application of the principles of mathematics, physical and applied sciences and law to measuring and locating lines, angles, elevations and natural or artificial features in the air, on the surface of the earth, underground and on the beds of bodies of water for the purpose of: (1) monumenting property boundaries; (2) planning, designing, and platting of land and subdivisions including the topography, alignment and grades of streets; and (3) preparing and perpetuating maps, record plats and property descriptions. Any person who offers to perform, holds out as being able to perform, or who does perform land surveying for others shall be practicing land surveying. Nothing contained in the provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15, shall prohibit a licensed professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or professional geoscientist from doing any work included in the practice of engineering, architecture, landscape architecture, and professional geoscience, if the work does not involve the establishment or reestablishment of property corners or property lines. Subd. 4a. Practice of landscape architecture. Any person shall be deemed to be practicing landscape architecture, within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15, who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any professional service in connection with the development of land areas where the dominant purpose of the service is the preservation, enhancement or determination of proper land uses, natural land features, ground cover and planting, naturalistic and aesthetic values, the settings, approaches or environment for structures or other improvements, and the consideration and determination of inherent problems of the land relating to erosion, wear and tear, blight and hazards. This practice shall include the location and arrangement of tangible objects and features incidental and necessary to the purposes outlined but shall not include the design of structures or facilities with separate and self - contained purposes as ordinarily included in the practice of engineering or architecture or the preparation of boundary surveys or final land plats, as ordinarily included in the practice of land surveying. Nothing contained in sections 326.02 to 326.15 concerning landscape architects shall be construed: (1) to apply to a professional engineer duly registered under the laws of this state; (2) to apply to an architect registered under the laws of this state; (3) to apply to a land surveyor registered under the laws of this state; (4) to prevent a registered architect or professional engineer from doing landscape planning and designing; (5) to exclude nursery operators or other small business people from the preparation of landscape plans appropriate to the normal operation of their business; (6) to authorize a landscape architect to engage in the practice of architecture, engineering, land surveying, or geoscience. No person shall use the designation landscape architect or any title or device indicating or representing that the person is a landscape architect or is practicing landscape architecture unless the person is registered under the provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15. Subd. 4b. Certified interior designer. (a) For the purposes of sections 326.02 to 326.15, "certified interior designer" means a person who is certified under section 326.10, to use the title certified interior designer and who provides services in connection with the design of public interior spaces, including preparation of documents relative to non -load- bearing interior construction, space planning, finish materials, and furnishings. (b) No person may use the title certified interior designer unless that person has been certified as an interior.designer or has been exempted by the board. Registered architects may be certified without additional testing. Persons represent themselves to the public as certified interior designers if they use a title that incorporates the words certified interior designer. (c) Nothing in this section prohibits the use of the title interior designer or the term interior design by persons not certified by the board. (d) Nothing in this section restricts persons not certified by the board from providing interior design services and from saying that they provide such services, as long as they do not use the title certified interior designer. (e) Nothing in this section authorizes certified interior designers to engage in the practice of architecture as defined in subdivision 2 or the practice of engineering as defined in subdivision 3. Subd. 5. Limitation. The provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall not apply to the preparation of plans and specifications for the erection, enlargement, or alteration of any building or other structure by any person, for that person's exclusive occupancy or use, unless such occupancy or use involves the public health or safety or the health or safety of the employees of said person, or of the buildings listed in section 326.03, subdivision 2, nor to any detailed or shop plans required to be furnished by a contractor to a registered engineer, landscape architect, architect, or certified interior designer, nor to any standardized manufactured product, nor to any construction superintendent supervising the execution of work designed by an architect, landscape architect, engineer, or certified interior designer licensed or certified in accordance with section 326.03, nor to the planning for and supervision of the construction and installation of work by an electrical contractor or master plumber as defined in and licensed pursuant to this chapter, where such work is within the scope of such licensed activity and not within the practice of professional engineering, or architecture, or where the person does not claim to be a certified interior designer as defined in subdivision 2, 3, or 4b. History: (5697 -1) 1921 c 523 s 1; 1933 c 404 s 1; 1945 c 380 s 1; Ex1967 c 28 s 1; 1971 c 22 s 1 -3; 1973 c 245 s 1; 1975 c 329 s 1 -3; 1979 c 209 s 1; 1 Sp1981 c 4 art I s 25 -29; 1986 c 444; 1992 c 507 s 3 -5; 1995 c 206 s 4 -7; 2002 c 239 s 1 326.03 LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED. Subdivision 1. Plans; documents. No person, except an architect, engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, geoscientist, or certified interior designer, licensed or certified as provided for in sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall practice architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, or professional geoscience, or use the title certified interior designer, respectively, in the preparation of plans, specifications, reports, plats or other architectural, engineering, land surveying, landscape architectural, geoscientific, or interior design documents, or in the observation of architectural, engineering, land surveying, landscape architectural, geoscientific, or interior design projects. In preparation of such documents, reasonable care shall be given to compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, and building codes relating to design. Subd. 2. Exceptions. Nothing contained in sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall prevent persons from advertising and performing services such as consultation, investigation, or evaluation in connection with, or from making plans and specifications for, or from supervising, the erection, enlargement, or alteration of any of the following buildings: (a) dwellings for single families, and outbuildings in connection therewith, such as barns and private garages; (b) two family dwellings; (c) any farm building or accessory thereto; or (d) temporary buildings or sheds used exclusively for construction purposes, not exceeding two stories in height, and not used for living quarters. Subd. 3. Recording. No plat, map, or drawing of any survey or subdivision of lands required by law to be filed or recorded with the county recorder or registered with the registrar of titles of any county, shall be filed, recorded, or registered therein unless there shall be endorsed thereon a certification by a licensed land surveyor. Subd. 4. Exception for persons elected in office. The provisions hereof shall not apply to any person holding an elective office when in discharging the duties thereof such person is required to do work or perform service of the character of work or service usually done or performed by an architect, engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, or geoscientist. Subd. 5. Insurance companies; rating bureaus. The provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall not apply to inspection and service work done by employees of insurance companies, their agents, or insurance rating bureaus. i;. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Final Rules March. 19, 2008 treated, through onsite or offsite detention, to at least sixty percent (60 %) annual removal efficiency for phosphorus, and at least ninety percent (90 %) annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids. The onsite retention of runoff may be included in demonstrating compliance with the.total suspended solids and phosphorus removal requirements.. 4.3.2 Low floor elevation No structure may be constructed or reconstructed such that its lowest floor elevation -is less. than 2 feet above the 100 -year event flood elevation. a All structures riparian to inundation areas or constructed or natural stormwater management facilities must be. located and elevations must be set according to Appendix 4a; "Suggested Low Floor Guidance." b Landlocked basins. Any new or reconstructed structure wholly or partially within a landlocked basin must be constructed such that its lowest floor elevation is: 1 I ft above the surface overflow of the basin, or 2 2 ft above the elevation resulting from two concurrent 100 - year single rainfall events in a 24 -hour period or a 100 - year, 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. 3 The starting elevation of the basin prior to the runoff event shall be established by one of the following: A Existing ordinary high water elevation established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; B Annual water balance calculation approved by the District; C Local observation well records, as approved by the District; or D Mottled soil. 4.3.3 Maintenance All stormwater management structures and facilities must be designed for maintenance access and properly maintained in perpetuity to assure that they continue. to function as designed. Permit applicants must provide a maintenance plan that identifies and protects the design, capacity and functionality of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities; specifies the methods, schedule and responsible parties for maintenance; provides for the 24 m I� �Y; i'field failure due to an iii. North Carolina. :d of carbonates, reducing the ached C horizon material. The oil reconnaissance and may be 1: 10 with water —when drops per, soil containing carbonates ments such as glacial till and :h was their color when depos- )on exposure to air or oxygen - L or brown. The occurrence of ag therefore does not necessar- t only a penetration below the materials may be observed to ninutes after exposure to air: of weathering may be highly zither to continuous saturation impermeability of the deposit COLOR weans for identification of soils The color by which a soil is 2.3. COLOR STANDARDS 17 ;::•. designated should be that which it has when moist and in its natural state. The color designation of a stratum should give the range of color included, such as black to dark brown or dark brown to reddish brown. In using such compound terms as grayish brown or pinkish gray, the adjective is recog- ` nized as the modifying term. Thus, a grayish -brown soil is a brown soil with a grayish cast sufficiently noticeable to require recognition; apinkish -gray soil is a gray soil with a pinkish cast. A soil that has spots, streaks, or splotches of one or more colors. against a background of another predominant color is called a mottled soil. For example, a soil may be descnbed as "olive gray, mottled with brown." In a :..' mottled soil the colors are not mixed and blended, but each color is more or i less distinct in relation to the general background color. When two or more distinct colors occur mixed throughout the mass in approximately equal amounts, the soil is said to be marbled. In a. marbled soil there is not, a general or predominant background color, as in the case of a mottled soil. The terms ;�, ;,• •: spotted, speckled, streaked, or variegated may be used in a soil designation when the generally accepted meaning of the term clearly describes the color distributions that occur in the soil. t 2.3. COLOR STANDARDS y T1ie U.S. Department of Agriculture uses the Munsell color chart in pedolog- '� , ,; • '. ical soil-survey operations. In this system colors are designated by the fol- lowing three variables: hue, value, and chroma. Hue is the dominant spectral or rainbow color. Value refers to the relative lightness or darkness of color. Chroma, sometimes called saturation, is the relative purity or strength of the hue; it increases with decreasing grayness. The relation among hue, value, and chroma is illustrated in Fig..2.3. t. In the Munsell notation of color, each of the three components —hue, value, and chroma —is measured on a scale from 0 to 10. For example, in the notation. for value the number 0 stands for absolute black, and 10 stands for 'absolute white. A color to which the number 5 is assigned is visually midway ,between these extremes. An example of the Munsell notation is "SYR 414." This means a yellowish -red soil of hue 5 for which the value is 4 and the ,chroma is 4. Soil colors are most conveniently and accurately determined by com- ;.. parison with a color chart. The chart used by the U.S.D.A, consists of 175 z7� -, - colored cards or chips systematically arranged by hue, value, and chroma ,;t_�, -.,,;_ • ' :-and marked by their Munsell notations. Asa rule, engineering usage does not require that the soil color be determined with the degree of refinement which ,: is possible by means of the U.S.D.A. chart. Ordinarily, an engineering orga- nization supplies each of its soil-survey parties with a smaller number of _color cards, say 12 to 24. The actual number depends on the range of soil colors encountered in the state or region in which the work is being done. These' cards, .however, should match with selected colors on the U.S.D.A. chart, in order that a satisfactory degree of uniformity in color terminology l' :i •' F 6 owe con \�roRPOPATD� 1868 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.L.2. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ❑ Action ❑ Discussion ® Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Council discussion to take place 12 -21- 10) — Revised Draft Of Ordinance No. 2010 -18 Regarding Administration And Procedures Of The Zoning Ordinance And Establishing A PUD District ACTION REQUESTED: No action necessary. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Per the request of the City Council, attached is a draft of Ordinance 2010 -18. The Ordinance has been revised to include changes recommended by the City Council (new text is in blue) at the November 16, 2010 meeting. Discussion on this item is intended to take place at the December 21, 2010 City Council meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 2010-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE CONCERNING ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES AND ESTABLISHING A PUD DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.04 is amended to read: 850.04 Administration and Procedures for Variances and Appeals, Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Conditional Use Permits. Subd. 9 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, applications shall be approved or denied within sixty (60) days from the date of its official and complete submission unless extended by the City pursuant to statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Subd. 4 2 Variances and Appeals. A. Zoning Board of Appeals. There is continued a separate Zoning Board of Appeals of the City. The Zoning Board of Appeals is the board of appeals and adjustments created pursuant to M.S. 462.354, Subd. 2. All members of the Commission, from time to time, shall be members, and the other members shall be six residents of the City appointed for a term of three years by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the members of the Council. For hearings, the Board shall consist, at a maximum, of any five members, but three members shall constitute a quorum for conducting such hearings and making decisions. However, at least one Commission member shall be in attendance at each Board meeting, and shall be deemed to be the representative of the Commission for purposes of review and report by the Commission as required by M.S. 462.354, Subd. 2. The Board shall make no decision until the Commission, or a representative of it, has had reasonable opportunity, not to exceed 60 days, to review and report to the Board concerning the decision. All members shall serve without compensation. Members may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Council or. pursuant to Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Section 180 of this Code. That Commission member in attendance at a meeting who, has the then longest continuous service on the Commission shall be the Chair for that meeting. The Board shall adopt such bylaws as' shall be necessary or desirable for conduct of its business. Staff services shall be provided by the Planning, Department. Board members who. . discontinue legal residency in the City shall be automatically removed from office effective as of the date of such discontinuance. Vacancies shall be filed pursuant to Subsection 180.03 of this Code. B. Powers and'Duties of Board. The Board shall have the power and duty of hearing and deciding, subject to appeal to the Council, the following matters: 1. Requests for variances from the literal provisions of this Section; 2. Appeals in which it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the interpretation or enforcement of this Section; 3. Requests for variances from the literal provisions of Section 1046 of this Code; 4. Requests for modifications from the requirements of Section 815 of this Code; and 5. If a variance request is part of another land use application, including but not limited to a conditional use permit, rezoning, and preliminary or final site plan, the decision by the Zoning Board of Appeals is automatically appealed to the City Council. The City Council would then take official action on the applications including the variance. If a variance request is made along with a certificate of appropriateness for the Heritage Preservation Board, the Zoning Board of Appeals decision is not automatically appealed. Final decision of the Board of Appeals would stand unless appealed by the applicant or another, impacted individual: C. Petitions for Variances. The owner or owners of land to which the variance relates may file a petition for a variance with. the Planning Department. The petition shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. The petition shall be accompanied by plans and drawings to scale which clearly illustrate, to the satisfaction of the Planner, the improvements to be Existing text - XXXX .2- Stricken text —X Added text — XXXx _ Text added after Council first reading - XXXX made if the variance is granted. The Planner may require the petitioner to submit a certificate by a registered professional land surveyor verifying the location of all buildings, setbacks and building coverage, and certifying other facts that in the opinion of the Planner are necessary for evaluation of the petition. D. Appeals of Administrative Decisions. A person who deems himself or herself aggrieved by an alleged error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the interpretation and enforcement of this Section, may appeal to the Board by filing a written appeal with the Planning Department within thirty (30) days after the date of such order, requirement, decision or determination. The appeal shall fully state the order to be appealed and the relevant facts of the matter. E. Hearing and Decision by the Board; Notice. 12. Notice of variance hearings shall be mailed not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to the person who filed the petition for variance and to each owner of property situated wholly or partially within two hundred (200) feet of the property to which the variance relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can be reasonably determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. 23. A notice of hearing for appeals of administrative decisions shall be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days before the hearing. A notice shall also be mailed to the appellant. 34. No new notice need be given for any hearing which is continued by the Board to a specified future date. F. Findings for Variances. The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 3 to i-. - - - 12. Notice of variance hearings shall be mailed not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to the person who filed the petition for variance and to each owner of property situated wholly or partially within two hundred (200) feet of the property to which the variance relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can be reasonably determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. 23. A notice of hearing for appeals of administrative decisions shall be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days before the hearing. A notice shall also be mailed to the appellant. 34. No new notice need be given for any hearing which is continued by the Board to a specified future date. F. Findings for Variances. The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 3 intent of this Section. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this Section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of this Section. A favorable vote by the Board shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Board meeting. G. Appeals from Decisions of the Board. 1. The following individuals may appeal a decision of the Board: a. any petitioner for a variance; b. any owner to whom notice of the variance hearing is required to be mailed pursuant to this Section; c. the appellant in the case of an appeal of an administrative decision; d. any person who deems to be aggrieved by the Board's decision on the appeal of an administrative decision; and e. any administrative officer of the City; 2. An appeal from a decision of the Board shall be filed with the Clerk no later than ten (10) days after the decision by the Board. If not so filed, the right of appeal shall be deemed waived, and the decision of the Board shall be final. H. Hearing and Decision by Council. The Council shall hear and decide all appeals from the decisions of the Board, and variances associated with other land use applications, The An appeal shall be heard not later than sixty (60) days after the date the appeal is filed. The Council shall follow the same procedures as to notices, hearings, findings for variances and decisions that the Board is required to follow relative to the subject matter of the appeal pursuant to this Section. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the required findings even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. Existing text - XXXX 4. Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX I. Conditions on Variance Approvals. In granting a variance, the Board, or the Council on appeal, may impose conditions to ensure compliance with the purpose and intent of this Code and to protect adjacent properties. J. Form of Action Taken and Record. The Board, or the Council on appeal, shall maintain a record of its proceedings which shall include the minutes of its meetings and final order concerning the variance petition or appeal of administrative decision. If a variance is granted, the petitioner, at the petitioner's expense, shall duly record the final order in the proper office to give constructive notice. A verified copy of such order, with the recording data, shall be delivered to the Planner. The Board, or the Council on appeal, may require such order to be recorded and such verified copy to be delivered to the Planner before the variance shall be effective. K. Lapse of Variance by Non -User; Extension of Time. 1. If, within one (1) year after the date of the meeting of the Board, or the Council on appeal, at which the variance was granted, the owner or occupant of the affected land shall not have obtained a building permit, if one is required, and commenced the work or improvement described in such petition, the variance shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvement has been granted. 2. A petition for extension shall be in writing and filed with the Clerk within such one (1) year period. The petition for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to use the variance and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Board for hearing, findings and decision in the same manner as then required by this Section 850 for an original petition for variance. The Board may grant an extension of the variance for up to one (1) year upon finding that a good faith attempt to use the variance has been made, that there is a reasonable expectation that the variance will be used during the extension, that speculation will thereby not be fostered, and that the facts and circumstances under which the. original variance was granted are not materially changed. L. Denial. No application for a variance which has been denied in whole or in part shall be resubmitted within twelve (12) months of the date of the order of denial, except that a new application may be permitted to the same denying board, if new evidence or a change of circumstances warrant it. Existing text - XXXX 5 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Subd. 3 Tr- anSfeF tO Planned DIrtFIGts Site Plan Review. A. Improved I=Gtr.,. Any lot traAdeFFed' r r t Di } 'n} r DI e Planned Gemmrni I rli }rin} r nrl Planned IUStFial ilic}iw} Mixed D-86tF;Gt,.WhiGh, r r buildings, fed with a building OF r PFOVided that. 1 . No new buildingr, shall be GOnstFUrated on the t r t be added to o en!aFged m- 9—FOSS fiew-aFea by MGM than ten r 3, No dwelling units sha4l be i and 4. No suGh existing t damaged OF deStFOyed by r r eaFthquake, t shall be Festwed or Fepaired if the r t t of 1., ., and 4. abeYer the then owner OF o wners Gf the In} shall nemnly with and GOFApiete the PFOGer-,S few Final Development Plan app thraiz fifth r PFOVided that only .. .. ee vote of uses, buildings and lots. Plan by the WAiMpFeved Lets. Any M tFaRS Fred by this SeGtmen to a planned r r limitation, Residential t the Planned rl' } 'n} DI -nee•I GAMFFIerni I rli }rin} rlrr Planned InStFial DiStiivt Mixed r whiGh, on MaFGh t t was nOt iFn Feved with a building OF buildings shall b. t notwithstanding the tFansfeF to suGh di&id b, r Existing text - XXXX i Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish a formal site plan review procedure and provide regulations pertaining to ensure, compliance with the site design standards_ imposed by Sections 460 and 850 of the City Coder f3. Approval Required. Without first obtaining site plan approval it shall be unlawful to do any of the following. 1. Construct a new building or add on to an existing building that would result in an increase in gross floor area of all buildings on the lot by more than ten percent (10 %);I 2. Move a building to any lot within the City;; 13. Expand or change the use of a building or parcel of land or modify a building, accessory structure or site or land feature in any manner which results in a different intensity of use, including the' requirement for additional_ parking; 4. Grade or take other actions to prepare a site for development, except in conformance with a permit or an approved plan; and, 5. Remove earth, soils, gravel or other natural material from or place the same on a site, except in conformance with a permit or an' approved plan: C. Exceptions. Except in those cases specifically cited within this Title, the !Following shall be exempt from the foregoing requirements of this, Chapter; 1. Construction or alteration of a single - family or two- family residential building or accessory building, Existing text - XXXX 7 Stricken text —X Added text — XXXk Text added after Council first reading - XXXX . ■ - I • 1 "OR 0 - "7R - - WWO A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish a formal site plan review procedure and provide regulations pertaining to ensure, compliance with the site design standards_ imposed by Sections 460 and 850 of the City Coder f3. Approval Required. Without first obtaining site plan approval it shall be unlawful to do any of the following. 1. Construct a new building or add on to an existing building that would result in an increase in gross floor area of all buildings on the lot by more than ten percent (10 %);I 2. Move a building to any lot within the City;; 13. Expand or change the use of a building or parcel of land or modify a building, accessory structure or site or land feature in any manner which results in a different intensity of use, including the' requirement for additional_ parking; 4. Grade or take other actions to prepare a site for development, except in conformance with a permit or an approved plan; and, 5. Remove earth, soils, gravel or other natural material from or place the same on a site, except in conformance with a permit or an' approved plan: C. Exceptions. Except in those cases specifically cited within this Title, the !Following shall be exempt from the foregoing requirements of this, Chapter; 1. Construction or alteration of a single - family or two- family residential building or accessory building, Existing text - XXXX 7 Stricken text —X Added text — XXXk Text added after Council first reading - XXXX . 2. Enlargement of a building by less than ten percent (10 %) of its gross floor area, provided that there is no variance involved and also 'provided that the Planner has conducted an administrative - review pursuant to Section 850 of this Ordinance; and 3. Changes in the leasable space of a multi- tenant building where the (change does not intensify the use, require additional parking, or result in an inability to maintain required performance standards as specified in Section 850 of this Ordinance: D. Neighborhood Meeting. Applicants are encouraged to hold a, ,neighborhood meeting with nearby residents- and landowners prior to - -- filing of a formal site pip. n application: E. Sketch Plan: 1. _Prior to the formulation of a Site Plan, applicants are encouraged to present a sketch plan to the Planner prior to filing of a formal, application. The plan shall be conceptual but shall be drawn to scale With topography of a contour interval not greater than two (2) feet and may include the following. a. the proposed site with reference to existing development, topography, and drainage conditions on adjacent properties, at least to within two hundred (200) feet; b. natural features ;; c. general location of existing and proposed structures including signs;; d. tentative access, circulation and street arrangements, both public and private; e. amenities to be provided such as recreational areas, open space, 'walkways,_ landscaping, etc;l f. general location of parking areas; g. proposed public sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage ;; Existing text - XXXX 8 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX h. a statement showing the proposed density of the project with the method of calculating said density also shown; and L additional information that demonstrates the nature, intent, or benefit of the proposed development! 2. The Planner shall refer the sketch plan to the Planning Commission and City Council for discussion, review, and informal comment. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the Planner, 'Planning Commission, and City Council shall be considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request' There shall be no official application made for a sketch plan. It is an informal review and comment by Planning Commission and City. Council: 'F. Procedure: 1. Filing of Request. Request for site plan approval, as provided within, this Title, shall be filed with the Planner on an official application form. Such application shall be accompanied by a fee as established by City Council resolution. Such application shall also be accompanied by detailed written and graphic materials, the number and size as prescribed by the Planner, fully explaining the proposed change, development, or use. The request shall be considered as being officially submitted and complete when the applicant has complied with all specified information requirements. In cases where an application is judged to be incomplete, the Planner shall notify_the applicant, in, writing, within fifteen (15) days of the date of submission! 2. Proof of Ownership or Authorization. The applicant shall supply, proof of title and the legal description of the property for which the, site plan approval is requested, consisting of an abstract of title and as applicable supply documented authorization from the owner(s) of the property in question to-proceed with the requested site plan application! 3. Technical Reports. The Planner shall instruct the appropriate staff, persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in conducting an evaluation of the request;' 4. Additional Information. City staff shall have the authority to request additional information from the applicant concerning operational Existing text - XXXX 9 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX factors or to retain expert assistance with the consent and at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. Said_ information is to be declared necessary to evaluate the request and Ito establish performance conditions in relation to all pertinent sections of this Title. Failure on the part of the applicant to supply all'. necessary supportive information may be grounds for denial of the request., thereof meet with the Planner and City staff in order to present 5. Meetin with the Planner and Staff. The applicant or a representative ,information and answer questions concerning the proposed ,requests, 6. Commission Review and Hearing. The Commission shall conduct a ;public hearing regarding the site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official 'newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be 'given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. The Commission shall recommend approval by the Council upon finding that the proposed development meets the standards of Section 850 of City Code; 7. Council Hearing and Decision. The Council shall conduct a public hearing on the site plan_ in the same manner as the Commission' above: G. Standards. In evaluating a site plan, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider its compliance- with the following: 1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's; development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan and Water Resources Management Plan; and Existing text - XXXX 10 stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX - Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 2. Consistency with this Ordinance: H. Information Required. The information required for all site plan, applications consist of the follow_ ing items, and shall be submitted unless- waived by the_Planner.1 '1. Site boundaries, buildings, structures and other improvements shall„ be identified on -site with a current certificate of survey, prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed land surveyor, depicting the, following a. scale of plan (engineering scale only, at one inch equals fifty feet (1" = 50') or-less..),,,, b. north point indication;,, c. existing_ boundaries with lot dimension and area d. existing site improvements; e. all encroachments; `F. easements of record; g. legal description of the property; and h._ponds, lakes, springs, rivers or other waterways bordering -on -or !running through the subjectproperty 2. A site plan utilizing a copy of the current certificate of survey as a base for the site in question, depicting the following: a. name and address of developer /owners b. name and address of architect/designer; c. date of plan preparation; d.- dates and description of all revisions ", e. name of protect or development; and f. all proposed improvements, including:. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text -XXXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 11 . ' o u re ired and proposed sed setbacks, q_ _ p_ _ .. ii. location, setback and dimensions of all proposed buildings and structures'- iii. location of all adjacent buildings-located within one hundred - property - _ i in, _ ;(100) feet of the exterior boundaries of the question; iv. location, number, dimensions, and setbacks of proposed ;parking spaces and drive aisles; v. location, number, and dimensions of proposed loading spaces vi. location, width, and setbacks of all curb cuts and driveways; vii. vehicular circulation; viii. sidewalks, walkways, trails ix. location and type of all proposed lighting,_ including details of all proposed fixtures; x. location of recreation and service areas; xi. location of rooftop equipment and proposed screening;, xii. provisions for storage and disposal of waste, garbage, and recyclables, including details for screening exterior trash /recycling enclosures; and Xiii. location, sizing, and type of water and sewer system mains -- _ I proposed service connections., 3. Grading /stormwater drainage plan, utilizing acopy of the ccurrent. certificate of survey as a base for the site in question, prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed engineer, depicting the following: a. existing contours at two (2) foot_ intervals (may be prepared by a Minnesota licensed surveyor);! Existing text - XXXX 12 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX b. proposed grade elevations at two (2) foot maximum intervals c_. drainage plan, including the configuration of drainage areas and calculations; d. storm sewer, catch basins, invert elevations, type of castings, and type of materials;; e. spot elevations (may_ be prepared by a Minnesota licensed Surveyor);) f. _proposed driveway grades; g. surface water ponding and treatment areas; and, `h. erosion control measures: � Landscaping ' accordance with Section 850.10. a p lan mustuse a copy of the current certificate of survey as base, for the site in question,_ depicting_ the following:' a. planting schedule (table)_ containing: I. symbols;! ii. quantities; iii. common names;; iv. botanical names; y. sizes of plant material; vi. root specification_ (bare_ root, balled and burlapped, �potted,etc.); -and special _planting instructions. . location, type and size of all existing significant trees to be removed or .preserved;: diameter ors. read for local hardiness zone)-ormal mature crown c. lantin detail -show all species to scale at n _ Existing text - XXXX 13 Stricken text — XXXX Added text -XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX I . typical sections with details of fences, tie_walls, planter boxes, tot dots icnic areas, berms and the like; - - I . typical sections with details ith identification lof materials useds :...: and foundation plantings - iF. note indicating how disturbed soil areas will be restored through: 'the use of sodding,_ seeding, or other techniques; g. delineation of both sodded and seeded areas with respective areas in square feet;! rb. coverage plan for underground irrigation system, if an L where landscape or manmade materials are used to provide, screening from adjacent and neighboring properties, a cross - through section shall be provided showing the perspective of the site from the neighboring property at the property line elevation;; and -- - - - - j. other existing or proposed conditions which could be expected to affect landscaping; 5. Other plans and information as required by the Planner including; but not limited to a. architectural elevations of all principal and accessory buildings (type, color, and materials used in all external surfaces) b. _, "typical" floor plan and "typical" room plan drawn to -scale with a summary of square footage for each use or activity;; c. fire protection plan;; ,d. type, location and size (area and height) of all signs to- be erected upon the property_in question;; I . vicinity map showing the subject property in reference to nearby highways or major street intersections; and f. lighting plan; Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text -xxxx - Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 14 r. ' I. Plan Modifications. Minor changes may be authorized by the Planner. approved Proposed changes to the pp site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall design of the property shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan; J. Existing Approved Final Development Plan. All existing approved Final Development Plans as of 12 -21 -2010 are now deemed to be approved site plans.' - K Lapse of Approved Final Development Site Plan by Non -User; Extension of Time. If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building, as described in the application for final -d _'site -plan, has not begun within two (2) years after final d site, plan approval, the approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted. 2. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk within such two (2) year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an extension of up to one (1) year upon finding that: a. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension; and b. the facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one (1) extension shall be granted. Subd. 2 4 Rezoning. A. Initiation of Rezoning Process. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 1. A petition for rezoning may be initiated by the owner of land proposed for rezoning, the Council or the Commission. 2. A petition by an owner shall be on forms provided by the Planner, shall be submitted with plans, data and information required by this Section, and such other information that the Planner believes necessary for evaluation of the petition. The petition shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. B. Sign. The petitioner for rezoning shall erect, or cause to be erected, at least one (1) sign per street frontage on the land described in the petition. The sign or signs shall be of a design approved by the Planner, shall be thirty -six (36) inches by sixty (60) inches in size, shall have letters at least four (4) inches high using Helvetica medium typeface or other letter style approved by the Planner, shall be constructed of sturdy material, shall be neatly lettered, and shall be easily viewable from, and readable by persons on, the adjoining street. The sign or signs shall contain the following information: "This property proposed for rezoning by: (Name of Petitioner or Applicant) (Telephone Number of Petitioner or Applicant) For information contact Edina Planning Department: Telephone No. 952 - 927 - 8861" The petition shall not be deemed filed and the Commission shall not be The sign shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in place until a final decision on the petition has been made by the Council, and shall be removed by the petitioner within five (5) days after the final decision. The failure of any petitioner to comply fully with the provisions of this paragraph relating to the sign shall not prevent the Commission and Council from acting on the petition nor invalidate any rezoning granted by the Council. If the signs are not kept in good repair or removed as required, then the signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated by the City by proceedings under M.S. 429, or any other then applicable provisions of this Code or State Law, and the cost of abatement, including administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the sign is located. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 111561 D n Residential rlic• }�in� Reninnal Medmn C. Procedure for Rezoning f � 1. Preliminary DevelepmepA Rezoning and Site Plan. The petition for rezoning shall include a preliminary sevelepmertt site plan with the required data and information in Section 850.04 Subd. 3. above. easements, dFawn to a GGale of not sFAai'eF than 30 feet to the imh upon whirh are shown the fellewing data and WOFFnation- All I -- _ _ StFUGGWFes, WhiGh the petition Felates, and any existing All I -- _ _ _ d Y -- - - - I Al 2. Commission Review and Hearing. Withie 45 days -a€teF Upon receipt by the Olanne of the petition, fee and all other required information, in form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Planner will review the petition, preliminary development site plan and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition and preliminary Develepment site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least Existing text - XXXX 17 Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. 3. Council Hearings and Decision; Preliminary Zoning Approval. Upon request of the Planner, Manager or petitioner, and after review and recommendation by the Commission, the Council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition and preliminary Development site plan. The heaFing shall be held not late"han 60 days afteF the date e the FeGeo;rnendatlen by the Gommissien-. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Council to a specified future date. An affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to grant preliminary rezoning approval. Provided, however, a rezoning from any residential zoning district to any nonresidential zoning district shall require an affirmative vote of four -fifths of all members of the Council. If preliminary rezoning approval is granted, the petitioner may prepare a final Development site plan. In granting preliminary rezoning approval, the Council may make modifications to the preliminary Development site plan and may impose conditions on its approval. The petitioner shall include the modifications, and comply with the conditions, in the final Development site plan, or at another time and by other documents, as the Council may require or as shall be appropriate." Existing text - XXXX 18 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 4. Final Development Site Plan. The final Development site plan shall include all required information and data delineated on the preliminary 4-11—AArkri el IDevelopmen site plan and, in addition, the required data and information in Section 850.04 Subd. 3. above. e. IeGation of all existing, and pi:elkmninai:� a, nd design of StOFFn seweFS, tagetheF with dimensions and leGations of -all existing 5. Final Development Rezoning and Site Plan; Commission Review and Hearing. PlanneF ar.Geptable to the PlanneF. Within 45 days afteF FeGeipt by the. of the ent Plan, The Planner shall forward a report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the Final Development Plan rezoning and site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) Existing text - XXXX 19 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading -.XXXX T. e. IeGation of all existing, and pi:elkmninai:� a, nd design of StOFFn seweFS, tagetheF with dimensions and leGations of -all existing 5. Final Development Rezoning and Site Plan; Commission Review and Hearing. PlanneF ar.Geptable to the PlanneF. Within 45 days afteF FeGeipt by the. of the ent Plan, The Planner shall forward a report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the Final Development Plan rezoning and site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) Existing text - XXXX 19 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading -.XXXX feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. The Commission shall may recommend approval by the Council based upon but not limited to the following factors: finding that a. is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. is consistent with the preliminary Development site plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the final Development site plan; c. will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; d. will not result in an overly intensive land use; e. will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; f. conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and g. provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. A recommendation of approval by the Commission shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Commission meeting. 6. Council Hearing and Decision; Final Rezoning. Within 60 days after the FeGemmendation on the Final Development Plan by the Go i i i The Council shall conduct a public hearing on the final Develepn; PUn,rezoning and site plan in the same manner and with the same notices as required for preliminary rezoning approval. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council may accept Existing text - XXXX 20 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX or reject the findings of the Commission and thereby approve or disapprove the final Development rezoning and site plan. An affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to grant final rezoning approval. Provided, however, a rezoning from any residential zoning district to any nonresidential zoning district shall require an affirmative vote of four -fifths of all members of the Council. , appFOVal and not d e-and fulfilled by the Final Development Plan-, must be fulfilled and Fnet, to the safisfaGtien of the PlanneF, befgFe the ZAGe amendment efferting the been Fnet and fulf4led to the _--graf-artion of the Planner-. 7. diStFoGt4n GGRneGtien with and at the same tome as final Feze approval-. 7. Filing. The approved final Development site plan shall be filed in the Planning Department. 8. Development. The development of the tract shall be done and accomplished in full compliance with the approved final Development site plan, as modified by, and with the conditions made by, the Council, and in full compliance with this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Applications for building permits shall be reviewed by the Planning Department prior to issuance of such permits to determine if they conform to the provisions of this Section, the approved final Development site plan, as modified by, and with the conditions made by, the Council, and other applicable provisions of this Code. 9. Changes to Approved Final Development Site Plan. Minor changes in the location and placement of buildings or other improvements due to U ;fGF °°^ c:---- mstaR es may be authorized by the Planner. Proposed changes to the approved final Development site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall Existing text - XXXX 21 Stricken text —XXXX Added text— .txx:c Text added after Council first reading - XXXX design of the property shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the final Development site plan, except that a three - fifths favorable vote of the Council shall be required to authorize the proposed change. 10. Lapse of Approved Final Development Site Plan by Non -User; Extension of Time. a. If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building, as described in the application for final site developm plan, has not begun within two (2) years after final development plan approval, the approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted. b. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk within such two (2) year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an extension of up to one (1) year upon finding that: i. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension; and ii. the facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one (1) extension shall be granted. Existing text - XXXX 22 Stricken text —XM Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - Ulm ■_ - E Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 23 - - - - ■ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - ■ _ - - - - - - - - - .. - .. -- - -- -----=--•--•--._.. ...._,.�..= ..�s.�- �:a= ..z-.L =.ewe - E Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 23 Existing text- XXXX 24. Stricken text —X Added text —XXXk Text added after Council first reading -XXXX ■- - _ - - ■- - - ' _ . "-Z I 7w _ _ -_ - - - _ - 7-TA a - - - - - _.. - ... - - - ■ MA 2 - - M LL NO Existing text- XXXX 24. Stricken text —X Added text —XXXk Text added after Council first reading -XXXX ■- - _ - - _ . "-Z I 7w _ _ -_ - - - _ - Existing text- XXXX 24. Stricken text —X Added text —XXXk Text added after Council first reading -XXXX G. Will Rot be detFimeRtal to -PFOpeFt;.e-- SUFFOURdiRg the tFaGt;. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 25 _ - f _ iFF.Tim -1 WYNN G. Will Rot be detFimeRtal to -PFOpeFt;.e-- SUFFOURdiRg the tFaGt;. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 25 _ - f _ Ltld G. Will Rot be detFimeRtal to -PFOpeFt;.e-- SUFFOURdiRg the tFaGt;. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 25 •- - - - Me el - MIM _ WM WIN IN - - - - - - - - •- - - - Me el Existing text - XXXX 26 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading -;XXXX 1 y , - - - - - - - • dFiveways, mains, 6anitaFy - - - - exits, f paNng aFea&,-4ea,-4;..-g / noneuveRA9 C1 -- -11- sadewalks, 1 f - - - ' •• MIM - 3 -.%--m -mnrz Trmw! f IGGatmen -1 of all existing, d. dFiveways, mains, 6anitaFy seyveFS, exits, f paNng aFea&,-4ea,-4;..-g / noneuveRA9 C1 -- -11- sadewalks, 1 f IGGatmen -1 of all existing, d. wateF mains, 6anitaFy seyveFS, PFOposed, r.eweFS, 1 Existing text - XXXX 27 Stricken text -X Added text -XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX -1 WIN Existing text - XXXX 27 Stricken text -X Added text -XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX D. Procedure for Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD)_District, 1 Purpose The r to comprehensive procedures and standards intend ed to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision, for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The,, 'purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most -or all -of the, following-.! -__ _ I provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development (pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive' IPlanr b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land Muse within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City;' c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. - Desired- design elements may Existing text - XXXX 28 Stricken text — XXXX Added text -XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'Tr MW IWM�3 im D. Procedure for Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD)_District, 1 Purpose The r to comprehensive procedures and standards intend ed to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision, for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The,, 'purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most -or all -of the, following-.! -__ _ I provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development (pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive' IPlanr b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land Muse within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City;' c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. - Desired- design elements may Existing text - XXXX 28 Stricken text — XXXX Added text -XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction' materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater„ management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses-,' d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. _ - -- e. maintain_ or improve the efficiency of public streets and, :utilities- preserve and enhance site characteristics including' natural features, wetland protecti on, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening g. allow for mixing of land uses-within a_ development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing;__and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses: 2. Applicability /Criteria a All p e conditional usesa and uses allowed by administrative, ;permit contained in the various zoning districts defined In Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they I ould be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned _R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a -PUD! b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following_; i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Existing text - XXXX 29 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading XXXX Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the iPUD include all the land uses so designated or, such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve J the purposes of this ordinance and the, 'Comprehensive Plan;; ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this; ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; .iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the, Comprehensive -Plan; and, iv._ the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most close) related ' Y conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above: 3. Procedures a. Pre-Application Conference. Prior to filing of an _ - application for PUD, the applicant must arrange for and attend a conference with City staff. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain' guidance as to the general suitability of the proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data, b. Pre-Application Sketch Plan Review. Prior to filing of 'PUD, the applicant is encouraged to submit a sketch ,plan of the project to the City Planner per Section 850_ .04 Subd. 3.E. The submittal should include a statement providing justification for the PUD, including but not Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text -XXXX Text added after Council first reading - `XXXX 30 limited to the intended utilization of the items listed in !the Purpose and Intent, and Criteria above., the sketch y Council Review. The Ian to the Planning C. Plannin g Commission and City Planner shall refer p - Commission and City Council for discussion, review; and informal comment. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the Planner, Planning'„ Commission, and City Council shall be considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. There shall be no official application made for a sketch plan. It is an informal I and comment by planning commission and City, - - -- 'Council. d. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary !Rezoning. Preliminary development plan submissions; may depict and outline the proposed implementation of the sketch plan for the PUD. The preliminary - development Plan submissions shall include, but not be limited to, the submission requirements stipulated in Section 850.04. Subd. 3. Preliminary rezoning process is stipulated in Section 850.04 Subd. 4.0 e. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. After approval of the preliminary development plan, the, applicant may apply for a final development plan and, final rezoning approval for all or a portion of the PUD The final development plan submissions shall include, but not be limited to, the submission requirements; ;stipulated in Section 850.04 Subd. 3. Final rezoning process is stipulated in Section 850.04. Subd. 4.0 final rezoning to PUD becomes official won adoption of, an ordinance rezoning the property_.' Afer Existing text - XXXX 31 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX, Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX • M W-W - - - - - - - _ MW - MMU - - Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX I- MW - MMU - -- fi.1 - . _ a ZT—M - Mr. NEWS m MUM Z MONK _ - 'WAYMP-M e1WAUMM - - - - - - - ilk- Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX MW Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX G-. E Restriction on Rezoning After Denial of Petition. After the Council has denied a petition for rezoning, the owner of the tract to which the petition related may not file a new petition for a period of one year following the date of such denial for transferring the same tract, or any part, to the same district or subdistrict (if the district has been divided into subdistricts) to which such transfer was previously denied. Provided, however, that such petition may be filed if so directed by the Council on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council after presentation to the Council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the tract. F. Text Amendments. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance other than Rezoning! `1. A petition for a text o amendment may the Combmission initiated petit on by anof affected land, th owner shall be on forms provided by the Planner and such other, information that the Planner believes necessary for evaluation of the petition. The petition shall be accom panied_ by the_ fee_set forth in Section 185 of this Code, 2. Commission other required information, in petition, fee and all of n form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Planner will review the petition, and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, at least ten_(1.0) days prior to the date of the Existing text - XXXX 33 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —xXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX _ - - Kd G-. E Restriction on Rezoning After Denial of Petition. After the Council has denied a petition for rezoning, the owner of the tract to which the petition related may not file a new petition for a period of one year following the date of such denial for transferring the same tract, or any part, to the same district or subdistrict (if the district has been divided into subdistricts) to which such transfer was previously denied. Provided, however, that such petition may be filed if so directed by the Council on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council after presentation to the Council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the tract. F. Text Amendments. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance other than Rezoning! `1. A petition for a text o amendment may the Combmission initiated petit on by anof affected land, th owner shall be on forms provided by the Planner and such other, information that the Planner believes necessary for evaluation of the petition. The petition shall be accom panied_ by the_ fee_set forth in Section 185 of this Code, 2. Commission other required information, in petition, fee and all of n form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Planner will review the petition, and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, at least ten_(1.0) days prior to the date of the Existing text - XXXX 33 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —xXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX I earing. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the, oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified, future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the, Commission to a specified future date. 3. Council Hearings and Decision. After review and recommendation by the Commission, the Council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed text amendment. A notice of the date, j ime, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the j, ate of the hearing. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the' same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be 'given for hearings that are continued by the Council to a specified ;Future date. An affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to approve a text amendment, Subd. 5 Conditional Use Permits. A. Initiation of Conditional Use Permit. An application for a conditional use permit may be initiated by the owner or owners of the lot or building in question. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXIX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 34 _ - _ - - - AT 11 61"A I IM - j Y - - - - - - _ io e RM M Subd. 5 Conditional Use Permits. A. Initiation of Conditional Use Permit. An application for a conditional use permit may be initiated by the owner or owners of the lot or building in question. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXIX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 34 1. The application shall be on forms provided by the Planner and shall be submitted with required plans, data and information, and such other information as, in the opinion of the Planner, is necessary for evaluation of the application. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. B. Sign. All provisions and requirements in this Subsection relating to erection of a sign in connection with a rezoning of property shall apply to the applicant for a conditional use permit, and the applicant shall comply with all such provisions and requirements, except that the sign shall state that a conditional use permit is proposed for the property instead of rezoning. C. Application Data. 1. If the conditional use permit is requested to allow a principal or accessory use that requires the construction of a new building or accessory use facilities, or additions or enlargements to an existing building or accessory use facilities, the application shall be drawn to a scale acceptable to the Planner, and be accompanied by plans containing the following data and information: a. elevation drawings of all new buildings or accessory use facilities, or additions and enlargements to existing buildings or accessory use facilities, including a description of existing and proposed exterior building materials; b. the location, dimensions and other pertinent information as to all proposed and existing buildings, structures and other improvements, streets, alleys, driveways, parking areas, loading areas and sidewalks; c. a landscape plan and schedule in accordance with Subsection 850.10; d. a floor plan showing the location, arrangement and floor area of existing and proposed uses; and e. any other information required, in the opinion of the Planner, to evaluate the application, to determine consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and to ensure compliance with the requirements contained in this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Existing text - XXXX 35 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 2. If the conditional use permit is requested to allow a principal or accessory use that does not require construction of a new building or accessory use facilities, or additions or enlargements to an existing building or accessory use facilities, the application shall be accompanied by plans showing: a. the location, arrangement and floor area of existing and proposed uses; b. the location, dimensions and other pertinent information as to all buildings, structures, streets, alleys, driveways, parking areas, loading areas, sidewalks and landscaping; and c. any other information required, in the opinion of the Planner, to evaluate the application, determine consistency, with the Comprehensive Plan, and ensure compliance with the requirements contained in this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. D. Commission Review and Hearing. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the application. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings, which are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. E. City Council Hearing and Decision. Upon request of the Planner, Manager or applicant, and after review and recommendation by the Commission, the Council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the application. The hearing shall be held not Wei: than sixty (60) days afteF the date ef the M X7 FIRGGrnmendation by the GeFnFn1ssiGn-. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 36 each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the application relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued to a specified future date. The Council shall not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; 2. ' Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; fasil+ties; 5. 6-. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and 6. 7-. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Approval of a conditional use permit requires a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. Existing text - XXXX 37 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX detFomeRtal wef#afe', 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; 2. ' Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; fasil+ties; 5. 6-. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and 6. 7-. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Approval of a conditional use permit requires a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. Existing text - XXXX 37 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX F. Conditions and Restrictions. The Commission may recommend that the Council impose, and the Council with or without such recommendation may impose, conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, operation or duration of the use as deemed necessary for the protection of the public interest and adjacent properties, to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code, and to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Council may require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary to secure compliance with any conditions imposed. No use shall be established or maintained, and no building or other permit for establishing or maintaining such use shall be granted, until the applicant has met and fulfilled all conditions imposed by the Council to the satisfaction of the Planner. G. Expansions of Conditional Uses. No use allowed by conditional use permit, or any building or structure accessory thereto, shall be increased in gross floor area or height, nor shall any off - street parking facilities accessory to the building or structure be enlarged in surface area to accommodate additional automobiles, without first obtaining, in each instance, a conditional use permit. H. Restriction on Resubmission After Denial. No application for a conditional use permit which has been denied by the Council shall be resubmitted for a period of one year following the date of the denial by the Council. Provided, however, that the application may be resubmitted if so directed by the Council on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council after presentation to the Council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the proposed use or tract on which it is to be located. Lapse of Conditional Use Permit by Non -User, Extension of Time. 1. If no use allowed by the conditional use permit has begun within two (2) years from the granting of the conditional use permit, the conditional use permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time has been granted. 2. A petition for extension shall be in writing and filed with the Clerk.within two (2) years from the granting of the conditional use permit. The petition for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to use the conditional use permit and shall state the additional time requested to begin the use. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an original Existing text - XXXX 38 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX application. The Council may grant an extension of the conditional use permit for up to one (1) year upon finding that: a. a good faith attempt to use the conditional use permit has been made; b. there is a reasonable expectation that the conditional use permit will be used during the extension; and c. the facts which were the basis for the findings under which the original conditional use permit was granted have not materially changed. No more than one (1) extension shall be granted. For purposes of this paragraph, a use shall be deemed begun when all work described in the original application, or information provided, has been completed and has received final City approvals and the use is operating for the purposes described in the original application. J. Filing of Conditional Use Permit. If a conditional use permit is granted, the applicant, at the applicant's expense, shall duly file or record the permit in the proper office to give constructive notice of it. A verified copy of the permit, with the recording data on it, shall be delivered to the Planner. The Council may require that the permit be so recorded or filed, and the verified copy delivered to the Planner, before the permit shall become effective. - - - - - - - Existing text - XXXX 39 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX ■ SINUM. OT NU 2 "Warm home by the iRGIuding the b. the speGift GGGUpatmen PFOposed f he aFidivridu Ic o ther than the Fes8dents of the home evneded to ON Existing text - XXXX 40 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX - Text added after Council first reading - XXXX ■ ON Existing text - XXXX 40 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX - Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - rat _ iL-.2 - - - - ■ .. v - P-L _ - - - - ■ .. - _ _ ■ ■, - - - Existing text - XXXX 41 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Subd. 6 Fees and Charges. A. Petitions and Applications. Each petition or application filed with or submitted to the City pursuant to this Section shall not be deemed filed or submitted, and the City shall have no duty to process it, to act on it or respond to it, unless and until there is paid to the City the applicable fee for such petition or application, as then required by Section 185 of this Code. This paragraph shall not apply to petitions or applications filed or submitted by the Council, the Commission or any City official in its official capacity. B. Administrative Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. Each petitioner and applicant, by filing or submitting a petition or application, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as provided, incurred by the City in connection with or as a result of reviewing and acting on such petition or application. If more than one (1) person signs a Existing text - XXXX 42 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - ' ME - - - - - - - Subd. 6 Fees and Charges. A. Petitions and Applications. Each petition or application filed with or submitted to the City pursuant to this Section shall not be deemed filed or submitted, and the City shall have no duty to process it, to act on it or respond to it, unless and until there is paid to the City the applicable fee for such petition or application, as then required by Section 185 of this Code. This paragraph shall not apply to petitions or applications filed or submitted by the Council, the Commission or any City official in its official capacity. B. Administrative Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. Each petitioner and applicant, by filing or submitting a petition or application, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as provided, incurred by the City in connection with or as a result of reviewing and acting on such petition or application. If more than one (1) person signs a Existing text - XXXX 42 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX petition or application, all such signers shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses and fees, with interest and costs as provided. The expenses and fees to be paid to the City pursuant to this paragraph shall be payable upon demand made by the City, and if not paid within five (5) days after such demand, shall bear interest from the date of demand until paid at a rate equal to the lesser of the highest interest rate allowed by law or two (2) percentage points in excess of the reference rate. The petitioners and applicants shall also pay all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by the City in collecting the expenses, fees and interest, with interest on the costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same interest rate as is payable on the expenses and fees. For purposes of this paragraph, reference rate shall mean the rate publicly announced from time to time by First Edina National Bank, or any successor, as its reference rate, and if the bank, or its successor, ceases publicly announcing its reference rate, reference rate shall mean the interest rate charged from time to time by the bank on 90 -day unsecured business loans to its most creditworthy customers. Subd. 7 Mailed Notice. Whenever this Section requires or permits mailed notice to property owners, the failure to give mailed notice, or defects in the notice, shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a good faith attempt to comply with the applicable notice requirements was made. Any appropriate records may be used by the person responsible for mailing the notice to determine names and addresses of owners. Subd. 8 Evidence of Ownership. If, in connection with any petition or application, the Planner requests evidence of ownership of the property to which the petition or application relates, the petitioner or applicant shall obtain, at the petitioner's or applicant's expense, and deliver to the Planner, a title opinion from an attorney acceptable to the Planner, or other evidence of such ownership acceptable to the Planner, in each case addressed to the City. Also, if so requested by the Planner, the petitioner or applicant shall obtain a written consent to the petition or application by all owners of such property as shown by the title opinion or other evidence of ownership and, if the request is made, the City shall have no duty to process, or to act on or respond to, such petition or application until such consents are delivered to the Planner. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 43 Subd. 9 Violation, Penalty, Remedies. A. Misdemeanor. Any owner or lessee of an entire building or property in or upon which a violation has been committed or shall exist, or any owner or lessee of that part of the building or property in or upon which a violation has been committed or shall exist, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the penalties and remedies provided in Subsection 100.09 of this Code. B. C': Violation of Conditions in Conditional Use Permits. If any person violates any condition or restriction imposed by the Council in connection with the grant or issuance of a conditional use permit, the City, in addition to other remedies available to it as provided in this Subdivision, may revoke the permit and all rights attributable to such permit. Revocation shall be done in the following manner: 1. The Manager or Planner shall notify the owner and occupant of the property to which such permit exists insofar as the names and addresses of such owner and occupant can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor, of the violation and request removal within a stated period, but not less than five (5) days. 2. If the violation is not removed within the stated period, the Manager or Planner shall submit a report on the matter to the Council and request a hearing. 3. The Council, upon receipt of the report, shall set a hearing date, and notice shall be given to the owner and occupant at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 4. After receiving the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. 5. If the hearing is continued to a specified future date, no new notice need be given. If such permit is revoked by the Council, all use, activity and rights allowed by and attributable to such permit shall immediately cease. Existing text - XXXX 44 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX f-T. - - Iry B. C': Violation of Conditions in Conditional Use Permits. If any person violates any condition or restriction imposed by the Council in connection with the grant or issuance of a conditional use permit, the City, in addition to other remedies available to it as provided in this Subdivision, may revoke the permit and all rights attributable to such permit. Revocation shall be done in the following manner: 1. The Manager or Planner shall notify the owner and occupant of the property to which such permit exists insofar as the names and addresses of such owner and occupant can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor, of the violation and request removal within a stated period, but not less than five (5) days. 2. If the violation is not removed within the stated period, the Manager or Planner shall submit a report on the matter to the Council and request a hearing. 3. The Council, upon receipt of the report, shall set a hearing date, and notice shall be given to the owner and occupant at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 4. After receiving the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. 5. If the hearing is continued to a specified future date, no new notice need be given. If such permit is revoked by the Council, all use, activity and rights allowed by and attributable to such permit shall immediately cease. Existing text - XXXX 44 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Section 2. Subsection 850.09 is amended to add the following: 850.09 Districts. For the purposes of this Section, the City shall be divided into the following zoning districts: Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) Planned Residence District (PRD and PSR) Mixed Development District (MDD) Planned Office District (POD) Planned Commercial District (PCD) Planned Industrial District (PID) Regional Medical District (RMD) Automobile Parking District (APD) Heritage Preservation Overlay District (HPD) Floodplain Overlay District (FD) Planned Unit Development District (PUD) Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Existing text - XXXX 45 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2010. City Clerk Existing text - XXXX 46 Stricken text — XUX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX El of 1W •rA,%Z�;��. RE PO RURECO M M E N ®ATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.M. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Request for Extension of Final Development Plan with Edina Realty Building, 3930 West 49 -1/2 Street. a Variance — ACTION REQUESTED: Extend the approved Final Development Plan and Variance for one year. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to extend the approval of a Final Development Plan with Variance, to tear down the existing two -story 14,000 square foot office building and rebuild a new 13,130 square foot office building at 3930 West 49 -1/2 Street. The approved variance is for a 7 -foot parking lot rear yard setback. The applicant has submitted the attached letter explaining why the project has not moved forward. The City Council may grant an extension of up to one year upon finding that: i. there is reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension, and ii. the facts which are the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one extension shall be granted. The approved plans and the facts which were the basis for approval have not changed. ATTACHMENTS: Letter requesting the extension Approving Resolution No. 2008 -126 City Council minutes — December 16, 2008 Approved Plans Eberhardt PROPERTIES, INC. Crnnniercial Real Estate VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL November 11, 2010 Mr. Cary Teague, ACIP Planning Director City of Edina cteaaue4ci.edina.mn.us RE: Request for Final Development Plan Extension Edina Realty Building 3930 Building LLC (James W. Nelson, owner) 3930 West 49 1/2 Street (the "Property ") Edina MN 55424 Dear Cary: We represent the owner of the Property, James W. Nelson, and on December 16, 2008 a final development plan was approved by the City Council to demolish the existing improvements and construct a new commercial building on the site. The facts that were the basis for approving the Project have not materially changed. The Project has yet to commence due to the uncertain economic conditions of the last two years, which has precluded us from securing the necessary leasing and financing arrangements to move forward. We continue to pursue these arrangements with tenant prospects, including the existing tenant, Edina Realty, as well as with various lenders and have a reasonable expectation that circumstances will improve to a point where we can begin the project within the requested one year extension. We appreciate your consideration. Please contact us with any questions. Very truly yours EB.ERHARDT PROPERTIES, INC. Thomas M. Non e s President CC James W. Nelson WWWW ..EBEF,IIARDTPROPERTIF.S.0067 • 2988 JOP1'A AvGNUL•', ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 • TEL: 952) 9ZG -1569 • FAX: 952) 926 -2572 w9IN�1ll, - �� Q� �y RESOLUTION NO. 2008-126 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR EBERHARDT REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Eberhardt Real Estate Advisory Services are requesting a Development Plan review with a 3- foot, rear yard setback variance from 10 feet to 7 feet for the rear parking lot for the property at 3930 49 -1/2 Street West. 1.02 The specific proposal is to tear down the existing two -story 14,000 square foot office building, and rebuild a new two -story 13,130 square foot office building. 1.03 On October 29, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Variance. 1.04 On December 4, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved the variance. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 With the exception of the variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2.02 The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1) There is unique hardship to the property caused by: a. The property elevation drop of 12 feet from the north lot line. The encroachment would be located into a hill that separates the site from the adjacent residential property to the north. 2) The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance since: a. The proposed use is reasonable. It provides a reasonable on -site parking area for a new building that would be the same size as the existing building. b. The new parking area is a minor encroachment into the rear yard setback. C. The encroachment would not be visible from the residential property to the north. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2008-126 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan and variance for the proposed building at 3930 49 -1/2 Street West. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 26, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped October 23, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped September 26, 2008. • Landscape plan date October 23, 2008. 2) Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building. 4) The basement area shall not be remodeled into office space. The basement may be used for storage and mechanical space only. 5) Pavers along the front, side and rear of the building must be pervious, and subject to approval of the city engineer. 6) The on -site parking stalls must be striped. 7) Compliance with all conditions listed by the city engineer in his memo dated October 24, 2008. 8) The property owner must enter into a Skyway Agreement with the City of Edina to connect the second story walkway to the parking ramp. Cost of the connection would be the responsibility of the property owner of 3930 49 -1/2 Street West. The Skyway Agreement is subject to approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on December 16, 2008. Minutes /Edina City Council /December 16, 2008 stated words cannot express her gratitude to the residents and thanked them for the trust placed in herby allowing her to serve Edina. *MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 2, 2008, WORK SESSION OF DECEMBER 2, 2008, AND TRUTH IN TAXATION OF DECEMBER 1. 2008, APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Masica approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 2, 2008, Work Session of December 2, 2008, and Truth In Taxation of December 1, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE — APPEAL EBERHARDT ADVISORY SERVICES, 3930 49'/2 STREET WEST — RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -126 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague used a map to identify the location of this PCD -2 zoned property and explained the applicant proposed to tear down the existing Edina Realty building and rebuild a 13,130 square foot building in the same footprint. He displayed pictures of the proposed building and described the exterior building materials. Mr. Teague advised that a three -foot variance for the rear parking lot was also being requested. On December 4, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals. unanimously recommended approval of the variance request. Staff had appealed the Board's decision in order for the Council to take final action on the entire project. Mr. Teague advised that a primary issue was whether the proposed redevelopment was reasonable for the site. Staff believed it was a reasonable use since it was the same use and size. He described the parking requirements and consideration of the public parking ramp, noting it was consistent with the 1985 parking variance. The encroachment of the variance being requested was minor and found to be reasonable by staff, the Planning Commission, and Zoning Board of Appeals. Parking was not visible to the homes to the north because of the 12 -foot drop in elevation and pine trees that would provide additional screening. Thus, the variance would not change the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Teague read the proposed conditions and stated approval was recommended subject to those conditions. The Council discussion included: the height of the roof was 26 feet and the rooftop HVAC unit was 14 feet above the roof line; the existing agreement allowed both property owners to access the parking ramp; the existing parking variance would remain in effect; the parking ramp ratio was one space for 200 square feet of building. Proponent Presentation Jim Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, stated the existing building had been occupied by Edina Realty as a tenant since 1986. The building was now at the end of its useful life and they looked forward to investing in a new building that would bring value to the 501h and France business district through sustainable design features incorporating a long -term vision. Dan Green, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, displayed colored renditions of the existing office building, noting it would be moved back about one foot to create more space at the street side of the building. The area on the west side would be improved as a pocket park for the tenants and connection to the parking spaces. The plantings and parking configuration would be adjusted to better define parking and control storm water through a curb system. Mr. Green presented the proposed design and sustainability issues, noting it would be an energy efficient "green" building. He displayed several exterior elevations for buildings in this location; noting the common themes were brick, cast stone accents, and two -story commercial fronts. He then displayed exterior elevations for'the proposed building and described the classic design. The height of the mechanical unit was 39 feet, just under nine feet of the roof elevation, and would be difficult to see since it was located in the middle of the roof area. Mr. Green described the one -way traffic circulation and parking configuration, and noted the location of the pedestrian bridge. He stated they would encourage tenants to park on the upper levels of the ramp. Mr. Green presented the landscaping plan and advised of the improvements that Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 16, 2008 would be made to create a permeable surface with pavers, increase green space on the north side as well as a new retaining wall and parking area. He displayed colored renditions of the current and proposed buildings. In response to Council's inquiry, Mr. Nelson stated they have been in discussions with lenders, but do not yet have financing. During construction, Edina Realty staff from this location would be housed at Edina Realty's 6800 France Avenue location. Mr. Green presented and described the exterior building materials of reddish -brown brick, Indiana limestone, cast stone, dark colored metal panels, and linear sunshades that would be used on the south side of the building. It was indicated that the cross easement agreement for the drive aisle was perpetual. The Council discussion included whether the red banner depicted on the front elevation identified an area of signage and met the City's guidelines for color; a sign permit would be considered at a later date; the sidewalk would be constructed of the City's standard paver and be about five feet wide; the applicant would work with staff on the spacing and planting of replacement landscape trees; and that the height of 26 feet indicated on the plans described the height of the roof parapet, not including the mechanicals. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. Public Comment No one appeared to comment. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2008 -126, Approving a Final Development Plan with variances for Eberhardt Real Estate Advisory Services with the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The new building would be generally the same size as the existing building. 3) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance because: a. The proposed use was reasonable'. It provides a reasonable on -site parking area for a new building that would be the same size as the existing building. b. The new parking area was a minor encroachment into the rear yard setback. c. The encroachment would be located into a hill that separates the site from the adjacent residential property to the north; therefore, the proposed encroachment would not be visible from the residential property. The parking area sits 12 feet lower than the home to the north. Approval of the Final Development Plan was subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 26, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped October 23, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped September 26, 2008. • Landscape plan date October 23, 2008. • Building materials must be consistent with the materials presented to the City Council on December 16, 2008, and on file in the planning department. 2) Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building. 4) The basement area shall not be remodeled into office space. The basement may be used for storage or mechanical space only. Page 3 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /December 16. 2008 5) Pavers along the front, side and rear of the approval of the City Engineer. 6) The on -site parking stalls must be striped. 7) Compliance with all conditions listed by the 24, 2008. building must be pervious, and subject to City Engineer in his memo dated October 8) The property owner must enter into a Skyway Agreement with the City of Edina to connect the second story walkway to the parking ramp. Cost of the connection would be the responsibility of the property owner of 3930 491/2 Street West. The Skyway Agreement was subject to approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING — EBENEZER SOCIETY ON BEHALF OF 7500 YORK AVENUE COOPERATIVE — RESOLUTION NO. 2008-127 APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague described the location of the subject site on York Avenue and displayed a picture of the existing nine -story, 337 -unit senior cooperative building. The Ebenezer Society, on behalf of the Cooperative, had made the application to build a 76 -unit addition to the existing building. He displayed pictures depicting the underground parking garage and proposed four -story structure comprised of 47 assisted care units, 16 memory care units, and 13 elder care suites with underground parking and a small surface lot. The request before the Council was for the preliminary development plan and preliminary rezoning which was a two -step process. Mr. Teague said, if approved, application would be made for the final development plan and final rezoning from PRD -4 Planned Residential District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Development District. The property was currently zoned for an all -age facility, not strictly for senior housing. If given preliminary approval, application would also be made and reviewed by the. Zoning Board of Appeals for a maximum square footage variance for 14 dwelling units and a three -foot setback variance for the building from Edinborough Way. He added presently the site existed as two lots so the lot lines would be shifted to accommodate the new building. Mr. Teague advised that the traffic study conducted by Wenck Associates indicated the existing roadway system was adequate to handle the 234 trips per day that would be generated. The Transportation Commission reviewed that study and recommended approval. He reviewed the parking calculation and advised that the proposal was well within the senior housing requirements. Mr. Teague described the landscaping plan, noting a number of trees would be removed as a result of the addition but would still exceed the City's requirement. On density, a maximum of 44 dwelling units per acre was allowed and the proposal was for 36 units per acre and consistent with densities in the area. The primary issues were whether the proposed use and rezoning were reasonable for this site. Staff felt the use was compatible with surrounding uses, densities were consistent, amenities were in this proximity, and sustainable design was being proposed. Traffic would be supported by existing roads and the assisted living units would provide an opportunity for continuum of care. He noted the addition of senior housing may provide an opportunity for seniors that live in single - family homes to move to this facility and open the home for a younger family to move to Edina. Staff and the Planning Commission agreed that PSR -4 was an appropriate zoning district and the variances were justified due to the hardship caused by the existing underground parking garage. They also felt the unit size was reasonable but did recommend the City further study the question of whether or not the existing cap on the unit size of senior housing should be retained. On November 28, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. The Planning Commission further recommended that the Page 4 Eberhardt Properties miller dunwiddie Inc ARCHITECTURE i ANDERSON a UREACIIER atNa.iwkc�WIM4.. Ira % 1 : ! t ii 1 t i .. a i i 1 a I. IKRLd!l�ILIX 09 .26 . 2008 F— miller dunwiddie a�ou:ow . uuiacuEe , Eberhardt Properties Inc. miller dunwiddie in N. ANNE NSIM � NILALIIEI �. Eberhardt Properties Inc. wraw go tr `r "T ..e •�.Y f v � m PROJECT ADDRESS: 3930 49 112 STREET EDINA, MN 55424 4. .r. r A PROJECT TEAM OWNER 3930 LLC 3930 49 1/2 Street Edina, MN 55424 Contact: James Nelson 612.333.0006 alVVl=11115e7J =G Eberhardt Properties 2888 Joppa Avenue St Louis Park, MN 55416 Contact: Thomas Nelson 952.926.2572 /_1 :Za:Nrrx8i1 Miller Dunwiddie Architecture 123 N 3rd Street, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Contact: Dan Green 612.278.7698 CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT James R. Hill INC. 2500 West County Rd 42, Suite 120 Burnsville, MN 55337 Contact: Ben Hartberg 952.890.6044 MECHANICAUELECTRICAL ENGINEERS Karges- Faulconbridge INC. 670 West County Rd B St Paul, MN 55113 Contact: Larry Nemar Anderson Urlacher 901 Third Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 Contact: Mel Urlacher SHEETINDEX A.01 PROJECT NARRATIVE A.02 INDEX - PROJECT TEAM A.03 EXISTING CONDITIONS A.04 VARIANCE REQUEST EXHIBITS A.05 ILLUSTRATED SITE PLAN A.06 ELEVATIONS - SOUTH, EAST A.07 ELEVATIONS - NORTH, WEST A.08 SECTIONS A.09 MATERIALS MATRIX A.10 PLAN - BASEMENT A.11 PLAN - 1 ST FLOOR A.12 PLAN - 2ND FLOOR A.13 3D VIEW #1 A.14 3D VIEW #2 CIVIL! LANDSCAPE 1.1 TITLE SHEET 2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 FINAL GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, & UTILITY PLAN 3.2 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS 4.1 FINAL PAVING & DIMENSIONING PLAN 5.1 FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 6.1 DETAILS Sheet 1 of 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY & TOPOGRAPHIC MAP miller dunwiddie is w,snrr sv.. sw �a YNI[ISIY � YI' YENFA .. ,mss Eberhardt Properties EXISTING PARKING - LOOKING WEST EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION - LOOKING NORTH -WEST f. _ EXISTING EAST ACCESS DRIVE - LOOKING NORTH EXISTING SIDEWALK - LOOKINGEAST `> e. o x ... _ _. f *'d7AH EXISTING WEST PROPERTY BOUNDARY FROM NORTH RAMP EXISTING WEST GARDEN - LOOKING NORTH SOUTH ELEVATION (49 112 Street) FROM MIDDLE RAMP - LOOKING SOUTH miller dunwiddie in xmn mib vRa sue poi w�w.,00u.xx xw�.ias� e u: -mam i d�:�mam� fWni�WrYW4W. AH1OEO�SOH ■ HHLAOHEO u 'Eberhardt Properties Inc. . .......... _ _ _ .. 'i t j s. II 1s EXISTING PARKING CONFIGURATION VIEW FROM PROPERTY NORTH OF 3930 SITE 30' FROM BUILDING (STALL + AISLE) 42' REQUIRED BY CODE FOR 90 DEGREE STALLS �d W r,U IN Fun it IY Ie1W[ - PROPERTY BOUNDARY - -- - -- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PARKING SETBACK PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PARKING SETBACK _— EXISTING REAR YARD PARKING Its —t I --I. _ � r 711 EXISTING SIDEWALK v. 7, EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK ON 49 112 STRFET SIDEWALK NARROWS SIGNIFICANTLY WITH LIGHTS, PLANTERS AND SNOW miller dunwiddie nn nib w.., s.n, iw [wal.umFa.w Fa. iNIE1SIY • YIIACNtI .. Eberhardt Properties Pavers with pervious concrete Existing pedestrian light (relocated) Relocated street tree Existing street light Trellis with vines along ramp Ornamental tree Outdoor seating Foundation plantings Entry/Exit New specimen tree Asphalt parking surface Trash/Recycling enclosure Climbing vines Retaining wall Evergreen screen plantings Rooftop mechanical equipment Pedestrian access at Second Level of ramp W. See Landscape Plan 5. i for additional information EXISTING MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE (NORTH -RAMP) 13 k. P d1k. J 1 ILLUSTRATED SITE PLAN 1/16"= 1' -0" miller dunwiddie c . "lino Est ANA insav • IIOtA6Hf0 u s PARKING AREA 0 25 100 0.1 7'- p. I �_ teJCae- uu.utrc Eberhardt �� , \ Properties ® —� IW o. B IUri j PROPOSED 3930 2 -STORY OFFICE BUILDING �� EXISTING 1 -STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING o� u® N WD F(,�HHUY [�-7 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = V -0" 1/16" = V -0' 3930 49 12' 4T•10' _ �RTU :;nehna a d' I Level 1 miller dunwiddie T.O. RTU 39'-0" . •, p,."""""; w:' I Masonry 30' - 8" Level 2 ANNINSNN • MACHIN .. 16' 0" '1 30' - 8" Level 1 0' -0" Eberhardt 16' -0" Properties Inc. I Level 1 �r T.O. Mason '1 30' - 8" Level 16' -0" I Level 1 r, 3919 49112' Street g Rooftop Medwwl 3930 49 1 rZ Street ,7' 100• -0' rfol �11,i miller dunwiddie 3936 49 112' Street T.O. AMIFlSlY • YlLAClFI ,. 1 i � •ww."," 1/16" = 1' -0" g, 3930 49 1 I Street Rooftop Mechanical Street R.O.W. 4T -10' _6' -2112• T.O. Mason 1 RTU Sheline 9' -6' 7/ Level 2 �' �� 16'- 0" I `! I y + Level 1 0' - 0" I I _ WEST EL 1/16" = 1' Eberhardt Pro perties Inc. ;VA �ro�a REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.N. From: Marty Scheerer Fire Chief ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Motion to Authorize Edina Membership In HGAC Purchasing Consortium ACTION REQUESTED: To approve a motion that would authorize Edina Membership in the HGAC Purchasing Consortium that would allow for the purchase of vehicles and other equipment at the consortium pricing. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND : The HGAC purchasing consortium originated in Texas as the Houston - Galveston Area Council (HGAC). The purchasing consortium has proven to be an excellent medium for purchasing equipment due to the pricing being extremely competitive. When I was researching purchasing a fire engine from the consortium, HGAC has an excellent bidding procedure and many city and counties throughout the country have begun to join the consortium, which has driven the bid prices lower. This is a no -cost item to the City of Edina and the fire department would like to utilize the consortium to facilitate the purchase of a fire engine. would recommend your approval. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY t,. _jINA 11 . _U108:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 1 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341162 11118/2010 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 2,611.62 JANITORIAL SERVICES - NOV 2010 249483 1785093 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,611.62 341163 11/1812010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 28.20 249713 0808015 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 32.00 249758 0724797 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 80.80 249759 0808016 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 44.00 249760 0724833 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 185.00 341164 11/18/2010 100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 37,683.00 RECYCLING 249484 2330261 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 37,683.00 341165 11/18/2010 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 59.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 249665 110910 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.00 341156 11/18/2010 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 113.75 RADIO SERVICING 249485 18850 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 113.75 341167 1111812010 102382 ANDERSON, MOLLY 35.00 MEETING EXPENSES 249880 111010 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 341168 11118/2010 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 660.32 FOOD 249666 1455495 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 660.32 341169 11/18/2010 101276 APRES 92.42 PROPS FOR COMMERCIALS 249564 135463 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 92.42 341160 11/18/2010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 394.30 COFFEE 249486 418056 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 394.30 341161 11118/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 339.00 DUMPSTER FOR OLD PW BLDG 00001334 249697 1091004 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 339.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/1812010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341162 11/1812010 100266 AT &T MOBILITY 15.23 249667 870517029X11021 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 0 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 2 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.23 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 341163 11/18/2010 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,038.15 IN ICE GRAPHICS 00008049 249671 00081554 5500.1705 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,038.15 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 341164 11/1812010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 840.30 249714 55637200 5842.5512 81.97 249715 84419600 5842.5515 240.20 249761 55737500 5822.5513 98.05 249762 55627800 5862.5513 853.18 249763 55652600 5842.5513 43.00 249764 84419700 5842.5515 165.13 249765 84386300 5862.5515 56.00 249766 84386600 5862.6512 433.03 249767 6004400 5862.5515 117.33 249768 6006500 5862.5515 47.21 249769 84419500 5862.5515 92.53 249770 84450800 5822.5515 1,693.03 249952 55738900 5842.5513 529.10 249953 55732800 5842.5512 5,290.06 341166 11/1812010 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 158.40 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249746 110810 5101.4413 158.40 341166 11/18/2010 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 59.85 SURVEY MONKEY 249954 111510 2210.6103 59.85 341167 11118/2010 126139 BERNICK'S WINE 1,155.00 249955 13031 5842.5514 1,155.00 341168 11/1812010 127517 BERNS, SUSY 21.60 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249747 100910 5101.4413 21.60 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 2 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING A�T WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1', .10 8:11:52 Page- 3 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE ASSESSING FINANCE GENERAL (BILLING) CENTRAL SERVICES''GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES, GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT'SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES CITY t- INA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 11/1812010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341169 11/18/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 325.96 SHREDDER 249487 WO- 653662 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 142.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 249488 WO- 653892 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 249489 WO- 653912 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.15 STORAGE FILE BOXES 249490 OE- 240198 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 249491 WO- 654490 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.80 STAPLES, CALCULATOR RIBBONS 249492 OE- 240565 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 249881 WO- 652601 -1 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.22 RECEIPT BOOKS 249882 WO- 652593 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.46- RETURN 249883 CP -WO- 644965 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 280.00- RETURN- 249884 CP -WO- 646583 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.49 WRIST SUPPORT MOUSE PAD 249956 WO- 655882 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 87.62 LABELS 249957 WO- 656057 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.74 COLLATOR FILE 249958 WO- 656459 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 592.92 341 170 11118/2.010 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 249668 23704 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 65.19 TOILET SERVICE 249669 23703 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 65.19 TOILET SERVICE 249670 23702 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 164.72 341171 11/18/2010 122688. BMK SOLUTIONS 52.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 249628 63765 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 249628 63765 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 249698 62922 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 213.21 341172 11/1812010 117411 BONK, RICHARD 6.60 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249748 100910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 6.60 341173 11118/2010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 344.64 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003827 249885 87198154 1470.6510 FIRST -AID SUPPLIES 205.23 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 249886 87197762 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 549.87 341174 11118/2010 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10,149.00 LEGAL 249565 2851G -8/10 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL 12,581.21 LEGAL 249566 2851G -9/10 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL 7,237.93 LEGAL 249567 2851G -10/10 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL 'SERV -LEGAL 1', .10 8:11:52 Page- 3 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE ASSESSING FINANCE GENERAL (BILLING) CENTRAL SERVICES''GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES, GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT'SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG2000D CITY OF EDINA 11/17/2010,8:11:52' Council Check Register Page = 4: 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description' Business Unit . 29,968.14 a , 341176 11/1812010 102482 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY 859.82 DOG LEASHES 249959 0257622 -IN 1450.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL { 859.82 341176 11/1812010 101788 ;CAMPBELL, RICHARD 66.99 TRAINING EXPENSES 249672 110810 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.99 i, 341177 11/1812010 120541 CANNON RIVER WINERY 252.00 249771 3012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 252.00 341178 11/18/2010 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 533.35 249716 13383 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING i 15.20 249717 13384 5822.5515 COST-OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING " 3,632.50 249772 13388 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING n 4,181.05 • 341179 11/18/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 690:90 249773 88279 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107:00 249774 88296 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 797.90 341180 11/1812010 100897 'CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 249887 110210 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY' 19.23 249887 110210 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY i 22.90 249887 110210 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCYe 28.01 249887 110210 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.63 249887 110210 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 41.09 249887 110210 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 45.96 249887 110210 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 64.13 249887 110210 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 75.23 249887 110210 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 89.88 249887 110210 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES :. 146.69 249887 110210 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 226.62 249887 110210 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC'PW BUILDING 237.23 249887 110210 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 378.29 249887 110210- 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 428.64 249887 - 110210 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 983.62 249887 110210 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS I , ,d CITY l.. _JINA 1 . 10 8:11:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,584.68 249887 110210 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 6,425.65 341181 11118/2010 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 99.95 249775 431283. 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 99.95 341182 11/18/2010 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 311.35 65% EXCEL FOR LS 00001929 249699 4658 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 311.35 341183 11/18/2010 102166 CLEVELAND GOLF 129.60 GOLF BALLS 249673 3337673NO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 129.60 341184 11/18/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 282.20 249776 0178163611 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 258.50 249777 0168291005 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 727.30 249778 0148607215 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,268.00 341185 11/18/2010 101346 COLOURS 185.00 ECHP BROCHURE UPDATE 249568 10223 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 185.00 341186 11/1812010 120433 COMCAST 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 249674 164959 -10/10 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 82.59 8772 10 614 0220686 249888 220686 -11/10 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 165.18 341187 11118/2010 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 944.66 OCT CABLE TV ADVERTISING 249889 309731- 309735 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 944.67 OCT CABLE TV ADVERTISING 249889 309731- 309735 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 944.67 OCT CABLE TV ADVERTISING 249889 309731- 309735 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,834.00 341188 11118/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 348,068.60 ARENA RENOVATION 249960 APPL NO 9 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 348,068.60 341189 11/18/2010 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 66.92 114 - 09855685 -4 WATER 249890 1338138 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5421.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 5111.6511 1551.6180 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 5822.5514 5822.5515 5862.5514 5862.5515 5842.5514 5842.5515 1646.6182 5421.5510 5421.5510 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX RUBBISH REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 6 Business Unit GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL 38.49 8255 70 708 1422839 249894 1422839 -11/10 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.49 66.92 341190 11/1812010 104020 DALCO 135.30 GRILL CLEANER 00006330 249675 - 2268219 585.53 2 -WAY RADIOS 00008051 249676 2268153 641.25 WYPALL, CAN LINERS 00008060 249677 2269311 486.39 TISSUE, WIPES, LINERS 00009284 249891 2267095 1,848.47 341191 11/18/2010 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 528.20 ROOF REPAIR 249892 040746 528.20 341192 11/1812010 102286 DAVANNIS 208.71 TRAINING FOOD 249569 202092 159.84 TRAINING FOOD 249570 202099 159.84 TRAINING FOOD 249571 202103 208.71 TRAINING FOOD 249572 202108 737.10 341193 11/1812010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 794.10 249718 576368 22.40 249719 576369 3,862.65 249779 576366 66.30 249780 576367 2,755.70 249781 576253 44.80 249782 576254 7,545.95 341194 11118/2010 118189 DEM -CON LANDFILL LLC 393.84 DISPOSE OF BLDG MATERIALS 00001678 249893 103110 393.84 341195 11/18/2010 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 35.76 BAKERY 249678 349576 96.91 BAKERY 249679 349814 132.67 341196 11/18/2010 123162 DISH NETWORK 5421.6511 5511.6511 5511.6511 5111.6511 1551.6180 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 5822.5514 5822.5515 5862.5514 5862.5515 5842.5514 5842.5515 1646.6182 5421.5510 5421.5510 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX RUBBISH REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 6 Business Unit GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL 38.49 8255 70 708 1422839 249894 1422839 -11/10 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.49 CITY L. -MINA 1'. 10 8:11:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341197 11/18/2010 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 391.43 BULBS 249895 07479101 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 391.43 341198 11/18/2010 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 495.50 GYM RENTAL FOR WORK SESSION 00007022 249896 10273 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 495.50 341199 11/18/2010 127648 EDINBOROUGH PARK 50.00 SUPER SUNDAY FEE 249961 111510 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50.00 341200 11/1812010 102309 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC. 2,391.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE FEE 249573 32578 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 2,391.00 341201 11/18/2010 124863 FABCON INC. 51,143.86 FINAL PAYMENT 249962 111910 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 51,143.86 341202 11118/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 358.18 ROTORS, PADS 00005297 249629 69- 024348 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.30 TIRE SENSORS 00005253 249630 69- 023554 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 462.48 341203 11118/2010 106036 FASTENAL COMPANY 39.02 BOLTS 00005317 249631 MNTC2103595 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.02 341204 11118/2010 102845 FCC.LCC 40.09 ICOP CAMERA REPLACEMENT 249574 16535 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.99 ICOP CAMERA REPLACEMENT 249574 16535 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.08 341206 11/18/2010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 70.94 SHIPPING RETURNS 4808 -0003 249680 062200020303 5440.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 70.94 341206 11118/2010 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 149.09 BOOTS 00003835 249493 6794 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 148.55 AXES 00003825 249897 6790 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 297.64 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 341207 11/18/2010 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 168.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 168.00 341208 11118/2010 100764 G & K SERVICES 78.60 137.02 324.02 483.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 - 11/16/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 249749 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 249494 103110 249494 103110 249494 103110 249494 103110 249494 103110 249494 103110 341209 11/18/2010 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 5.99 REIMBURSEMENT 249963 111510 79.20 REIMBURSEMENT 249963 111510 85.19 341210 11/1812010 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 48.08 PARTS 249898 103110 615.02 PARTS 249898 103110 770.04 PARTS 249898 103110 1,433.14 341211 11/18/2010 124641 GEYEN GROUP 427.50 CARPET CLEANING 00006151 249495 2976 427.50 341212 11118/2010 127616 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 22.70 TABLECLOTHS FOR LUNCHEON 249681 110810 22.70 341213 11/18/2010 119936 GLOBAL OAK 37.50 PARK & REC E- COMMERCE 249964 010741 131.25 ART CENTER E- COMMERCE 249964 010741 1,950.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 249964 010741 2,118.75 341214 11/18/2010 101103 GRAINGER 34.34 VAC BAGS, FAN 00006475 249496 9379194880 20.35 FAN 00006474 249497 9374796275 5511.6201 5913.6201 1646.6201 1552.6511 1553.6201 1301.6201 2210.6406 2210.6107 5422.6406 5630.6406 1553.6530 5420.6230 2210.6406 1627.6103 5110.6103 2210.6124 5422.6406 5424.6530 LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page- 8 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS COMMUNICATIONS SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE 5822.5513 5840.6406 5842.6406 5840.6513 4091.6406 1400.6104 1460.6230 1470.6151 1400.6151 1195.6170 1281.6104 1 , 10 8:11:52 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 845.58 CITY t .INA R55CKREG LOG20000 11/1812010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 300.50 Council Check Register 249720 123904 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date . Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 278,94 249632 9348149866 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 278,94- 249633 9350143815 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 331.38 SAFETY LADDERS 00005314 249634 9384743549 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 97.47 VACUUM, TAPE 00005299 249635 9384515772 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.73 TRASH CONTAINERS 00005302 249636 9385684338 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 230.33 CAN LINERS 00001000 249637 9386717756 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1898 HARDWARE 249899 9391507754 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5822.5513 5840.6406 5842.6406 5840.6513 4091.6406 1400.6104 1460.6230 1470.6151 1400.6151 1195.6170 1281.6104 1 , 10 8:11:52 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 845.58 341216 11/1812010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 300.50 249720 123904 300.50 341216 11/18/2010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 442.54 ANTI FATIGUE MATS 249700 110910 17.38 REIMBURSEMENT 249965 111510 35.68 REIMBURSEMENT 249965 111510 495.60 341217 11118/2010 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 330.00 LAWN IRRIGATION 00001018 249638 104956 330.00 341218 11/1812010 102164 HCMC EMS EDUCATION 1,180.00 EMT BASIC 249900 111010 1,180.00 341219 11118/2010 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 32.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 249575 210108114 1,274.96 RADIO ADMIN FEE 249902 210108015 1,686.80 RADIO ADMIN FEE 249966 210108016 2,993.76 341220 11118/2010 101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 1,277.90 OCT 2010 BOOKINGS 249576 3314 1,277.90 341221 11118/2010 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 95.00 VEHICLE INSPECTION COURSE 00005242 249639 00214547 95.00 341222 11/18/2010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 5822.5513 5840.6406 5842.6406 5840.6513 4091.6406 1400.6104 1460.6230 1470.6151 1400.6151 1195.6170 1281.6104 1 , 10 8:11:52 Page- 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKREG LOG20000 2,159.25 CITY OF EDINA 341227 11118/2010 Council Check Register 11/18/2010 — 11/18/2010 00008061 249682 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,415.68 NEW COMPUTERS 00004380 249498 48463392 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4,415.68 7,328.07 IMPOUNDS 249967 341223 11/18/2010 KENNEL SERVICE 106388 HLB TAUTGES REDPATH LTD. 7,328.07 3,858.00 GOLF AUDIT 249499 001105288 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,858.00 37.52 THERMOMETER 00002507 249903 341224 11/18/2010 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100806 HOBART SERVICE 37.52 502.28 DISHWASHER REPAIR 00006336 249500 04047061 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 502.28 510.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 249968 341226 11118/2010 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 127618 HOFF, SANDRA 510.00 27.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249750 100910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 27.00 69.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249751 341226 11118/2010 ART WORK SOLD 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. - 69.00 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 10 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES 751.00 249783 540245 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 179.50 249784 540217 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,228.75 249785 540244 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ANIMAL CONTROL EDINBOROUGH PARK ASSESSING ART CENTER REVENUES 2,159.25 341227 11118/2010 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 1,649.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVICE 00008061 249682 3510254 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE 1,649.00 341228 11118/2010 101618 HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL 7,328.07 IMPOUNDS 249967 313789 1450.6217 KENNEL SERVICE 7,328.07 341229 11/18/2010 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 37.52 THERMOMETER 00002507 249903 10110206 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.52 341230 11/1812010 100812 IAAO 510.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 249968 111510 1190.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 510.00 341231 11/18/2010 126093 ILVONEN, ILONA 69.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249751 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD - 69.00 341232 11/18/2010 118276 J.P. COOKE CO., THE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ANIMAL CONTROL EDINBOROUGH PARK ASSESSING ART CENTER REVENUES CITY L. ,NA 11: "108:11:52 "R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page 11/18/2010 - 11/1812010 i Check # Date . Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger_Account Description Business Unit 112.60 CUSTOM STAMPS 249577 93713 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 112.60 341233 11/18/2010 102167 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 605.00 ANNUAL RETAINER FEE 249683 LIFEGUARD 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL`` ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT 605.00 341234 - 11/18/2010 100828 JERRY S FOODS 24.68 249501 110410 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 27.97 249501 110410 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.26 249501 110410 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND' FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 118:91 341236 11/18 @010 100829 JERRYS HARDWARE 1.69 249969 103110 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL . 4.09 249969 103110 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL .. 6.48 249969 103110 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 6.83 249969 103110 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ` POOL OPERATION 13,22 249969 103110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 16.16 249969 103110 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 17.92 249969 103110 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 19.37 249969 103110 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 43,82 249969 103110 1553.6406 '. GENERAL SUPPLIES'. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.05 249969 103110 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.37 249969 103110 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 38.55 249969 103110 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 65.28 249969 103110 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 70.78 249969 103110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS - 8P,99 249969 103110 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102.79 249969 103110 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 109.19 249969 103110 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 410.86 249969 103110 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE, 750.02 249969- 103110 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,328.62 249969 103110 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE d 6,125:06 341236 11118/2010 102146 JESSEN PRESS 887.06 WINDOW ENVELOPES-. - 249701 24732 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 887.06 341237 11/18/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 249721 1443486 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 53.00 249786 1443487 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,487.47 249787 1443506 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,392.97 249788 1443508 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 38.80 249789 1443462 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,877.32 249789 1443462 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,655.80 249790 1443514 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING . 38.80 249791 1443515 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 24,594.16 341238 11/1812010 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES I LESCO 241.66 TRACKER 00006353 249502 56221734 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 241.66 341240 11118/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3,627.72 249722 1940562 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 251.41 249723 1940568 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 474.45 249724 1940566 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 42.42 249725 1940567 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 237.90 249726 1940563 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 267.37 249727 1940569 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.85- 249728 476550 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 189.61 249792 1943998 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,994.38 249793 1944002 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,588.80 249794 1944001 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.52 249795 1943997 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,207.30 249796 1944000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,067.22 249797 1944004 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 98.11 249798 1944005 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,845.90 249799 1944003 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE YORK SELLING 582.92 249800 1940565 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,053.57 249801 1944007 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,039.40 249802 1944006 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,972.42 249803 1944009 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 249804 1943999 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,382.22 249805 1944010 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,097.64 249806 1944008 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 616.22 249807 1943993 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 179.30 249808 1943992 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 294.08 249809 1943994 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 715.13 249810 1943996 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 151.12 249811 1943995 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O. _ tNA 11, i0 8:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 13 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 11,78- 249812 476254 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4137- 249813 476548 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CUSTOMER REFUND CLUB HOUSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2210.6406 481.72 30,045.25 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 341246 11/18/2010 1513.6203 341241 11/18/2010 5620.6201 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 311.92 PROLASER III MAINTENANCE 249578 429069 51.45 MOTOR 00002435 249503 073373 5420.6530 100606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 51.45 59.38 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 249702 341242 11118/2010 1,263.47 111018 KEEPRS INC. 249702 09552858 50.15 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 307.96 UNIFORMS 00003792 249504 147885 -01 1470.6558 249905 09530428 109.99 UNIFORMS 00003833 249904 152288 1470.6558 341247 11/18/2010 417.95 333.58 341243 11/18/2010 9749120 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. . 333.58 341248 11118/2010 94.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 249970 111210 1495.6107 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 94.00 110910 51.10 341244 11/18/2010 341249 11/18/2010 127614 KORINKE, RICHARD 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 585.25 481.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 249684 7707 TANGLEWOOD 5900.2015 REPAIR PARTS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CUSTOMER REFUND CLUB HOUSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2210.6406 481.72 COMMUNICATIONS 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 341246 11/18/2010 1513.6203 101936 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 311.92 PROLASER III MAINTENANCE 249578 429069 311.92 341246 11/18/2010 100606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 59.38 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 249702 09552858 1,263.47 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 249702 09552858 50.15 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 00004218 249703 09559275 352.10 UNIFORMS 249905 09530428 1,725.10 341247 11/18/2010 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 333.58 TERMINALS, FITTINGS, PLUGS 00005293 249640 9749120 333.58 341248 11118/2010 126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 249641 110910 51.10 341249 11/18/2010 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 585.25 249814 97831 REPAIR PARTS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CUSTOMER REFUND CLUB HOUSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 1553.6530 1554.6230 5822.5515 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 14 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,060.64 249815 97239 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,645.89 341260 11/18/2010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 178.52 MIRROR 00005352 249704 2110022 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 952.32 BROOMS, DIRT SHOES 00005353 249705 2110041 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 1,130.84 341261 11/18/2010 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 800.00 EVALUATION 249906 7124 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 800.00 341262 11/18/2010 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 1,800.00 HOSTING FEE 249971 111010 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,800.00 341263 11118/2010 126941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 324.80 BOILER REPAIR 249907 2538142 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 324.80 341264 11118/2010 103944 MED COMPASS 28.00 HEARING TEST 249908 16707 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 28.00 HEARING TEST 249908 16707 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 56.00 341266 11118/2010 101987 MENARDS 72.62 HARDWARE / TOOLS 00001879 249909 36506 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 175.14 TREE LIGHTS 00002210 249910 38103 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 247.76 341266 11118/2010 102281 MENARDS 33.99 ANTIFREEZE 00001002 249642 17453 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 290.14 CONFERENCE TABLE 249911 9831 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 58.35 CONFERENCE TABLE 249912 12557 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 141.97 LUMBER, NAILS 00001885 249972 20383 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 159.17 BLADES, LUMBER 00001885 249973 20148 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 683.62 341267 11/18/2010 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 106.55 BASKETBALLS, SCOREBOOKS 249505 128339 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 106.55 CITY (,. :iNA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledaer Account Description 341258 11/1812010 100886 METRO SALES.INC 973 SHIPPING CHARGES 249579 27656A 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4077.6103 4077.6103 5125.6406 5621.6107 11: 10 8:11:52 Page 15 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 5621.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 9.73 LAUNDRY 5620.6406 341259 11/18/2010 'TOOLS 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 82.50 OFFICIATING FEES 249643 3811 82.50 OFFICIATING FEES 249974 3819 165.00 341260 11118/2010 104650 MICRO CENTER 224.40 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00009281 249913 3000210 224.40 341261 11/18/2010 102873 -MILLER, SUSAN 284.25 PARKING / MILEAGE 249914 111210 284.25 341262 11/18/2010 121053 MILLER, SUSAN 37.50 PETTY CASH 249915 111210 48.57 PETTY CASH 249915 111210 281.49 PETTY CASH 249915 111210 367.56 341263 11/18/2010 102441 MINING AUGER & TOOL WORKS INC. 203.01 PIPE DRIVER 00001020 249916 24732 203.01 341264 11/18/2010 102682. MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 264.00 LICENSE RENEWAL- D. MICKELSON 249706 PM060722 264.00 LICENSE RENEWAL - T. EISERT 249707 PM060942 528.00 341266 111184010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 21.95 CO2 249685 R110100124 ` 21.95 341266 11/18/2010 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN 100:00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/5/10 249917 111210 100.00 341267 11/18/2010 104179 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENU 175.00 PACE COURSE - ADRIENNE GARCIA .249686 DEC 6-10 4077.6103 4077.6103 5125.6406 5621.6107 11: 10 8:11:52 Page 15 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 5621.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1648.6556 'TOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 16 11/18/2010 — 11/18/2010 • Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit r 175.00 341268 (i 11/1812010 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS I 50.00 WEB ADVERTISING 249918 118733 1 733 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING. 50.00 341269 11/18/2010 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS • 204.00 BASKETBALL REGISTRATION 249919 111010 4077.4390 REGISTRATION FEES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 204.00 341270 11118/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 58.78 MACHINE SHOP WORK 00001878 249920 0086674 -IN 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 58.78 341271 11/18/2010 100898 MINVALCO 473.58 CONTROLLER 00001947 249506 770765 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 473.58 341272 11/18/2010 122793 MODERN MARKETING INC. a 1,032.83 ANTIBIOTIC SOAP 249580 MM1077004 1400.6610, SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,032.83 341273 11/18/2010 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 740.00 ACTOR FOR COMMERCIAL 249581 130047 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 740.00 341274 11/18/2010 100906 MTLDISTRIBUTING INC. 179.83 SPINDLE 00006356 249507 764753 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 107.70 CARTRIDGE 00005353 249508 764586 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 162.39 NOZ BASE ASSEMBLIES 00006358: :249509 765564 -0.0 . 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 449.92 341275 11/18/2010 119217 NATIONAL DIAMOND 589.86 SAW BLADES 00001927 249644 348799 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 589.86 341276 11/18%2010 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 1,642.43 NOVEMBER COBRA 249975 111510 1120.6040 HOSPITALIZATION ADMINISTRATION 1,642.43 341277 11/18/2010 121125 NEMER, KAREN 162.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY' 249752 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/02/10 249923 CITY l.. ,iNA 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 162.00 341278 11/18/2010 368.00 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 249729 8281984 -IN 2,417.70 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 249921 93379 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,387.01 2,417.70 249817 8281991 -IN 341279 1111812010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 1,288.27 11, j10 8:11:52 Page - 17 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK 475.50 249816 62693 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 475.50 341280 11/18/2010 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 NOV PSAP MAINTENANCE 249922 80295778 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 341281 11/18/2010 116114 OCE 127.90 OCT 2010 MAINTENANCE 249708 987274571 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 127.90 341282 11/18/2010 124676 OKEE DOKEE BROTHERS 250.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/02/10 249923 111210 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00 341283 11/18/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 368.00 249729 8281984 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,387.01 249817 8281991 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,288.27 249818 8281975 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,043.28 341284 11/1812010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 323.06 249730 2985713 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 91.12 249731 2985712 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 936.50 249732 2985714 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 249819 2988236 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,013.71 249820 2988235 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 608.50 249821 2988238 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 150.99 249822 2988237 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 322.46 249823 2988246 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 403.14 249824 2988241 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,525.09 249825 2988247 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 649.78 249826 2988245 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 326.54 249827 2988240 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,501.45 249828 2988244 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 18 11/18/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,773.69 249829 2988242 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 632.60 249830 2988243 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 295.84 249831 2988239 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,399.98- 249832 3447054 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11,211.61 341285 11118/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 12,161.85 LOADER TIRES 00005053 249645 20730 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,812.48 TIRES 00005252 249646 27492 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 747.10 TIRES 00005296 249647 31362 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 369.57 TIRES 00005296 249648 39289 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 998.75- CREDIT 249649 782568CR 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 941.54 TIRES 00005296 249924 50651 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,646.18 TIRES 00005296 249925 53510 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005296 249926 53516 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,779.97 341286 11118/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 249510 110910 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 341287 11/18/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 185.00 PI PERMIT #376 FEE 249927 NOV22010 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 185.00 341288 11118/2010 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 155.78 SEAT REPAIR 00005357 249928 18512 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.78 341289 11/18/2010 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 287.50 PARKING VIOLATION CARDS 249582 057262 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 287.50 341290 11118/2010 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 72.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008062 249687 250398 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 72.00 341291 11118/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,005.29 249733 380469 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 715.90 249734 380695 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 291.73 249735 380696 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,397.82 249736 380542 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG -G20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 722.01 1,459.60 195.20 4,203.16 505.60 924.68 5.33 - 5.33- 11, 10 8:11:52 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description CITY C .JA COST OF GOODS SOLD Council Check Register VERNON SELLING 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 249833 380694 -00 5862.5513 249834 380693 -00 5862.5513 249835 378667 -00 5862.5513 249836 380541 -00 5842.5512 249837 380692 -00 5842.5513 249838 380691 -00 5842.5513 249839 375485 -00 5842.5513 249840 374756 -00 5842.5513 249841 374954 -00 5822.5512 11, 10 8:11:52 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description 11/18/2010 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 341292 11/18/2010 104299 QWEST 5,893.22 EMERGENCY PHONE LINE REPAIRS)0007021 249583 A180953- 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 5,893.22 341293 11/18/2610 123898 QWEST 121.72 952 926 -0419 249511 0419 -11/10 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 57.55 952 926 -0092 249512 0092 -11/10 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 18.18 651 281 -1355 8001311 249513 1355 -11/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 606.52 612 E01 -0426 249514 0426 -11110 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 E12 -6797 249515 6797 -11/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 517.51 612 E24 -8657 249516 8657 -11/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 290.66 612 E24 -8656 249517 8656 -11/10 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 516.97 612 E01 -8392 249518 8392 -11/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 199.80 952 835 -6661 249976 6661 -11/10 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,935.43 341294 11/1812010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,511.56 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001017 249650 847 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,511.56 341295 11/1812010 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 49.50 COOLER SPIGOTS 00006461 249519 CD1393864 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 49.50 341296 11/18/2010 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 1,676.87 ICE PAINT 00008052 249688 0046181 -IN 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1,676.87 341297 11118/2010 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 290.35 2 SPOOL PIECES 00001925 249651 12546 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 290.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 20 11/16/2010 -11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341298 11/1812010 119854 RHINO 406.22 MH MARKERS 00001918 249652 36570 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 406.22 341299 11/1812010 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 26.99 CAKE 249929 534 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 26.99 341300 11/18/2010 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 150.72 TRAILER WIRING 00005318 249653 1198386 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.22- CREDIT 249930 1581888 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.50 341301 11/1812010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 2,752.34 INSTALL NEW WATER SOFTENER 00006152 249520 00242143 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 2,752.34 341302 11118/2010 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 119.00 DRAIN CLEANING 00002011 249709 04815761954 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 119.00 341303 11/18/2010 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 220.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00001884 249931 45234 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 220.00 341304 11/1812010 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 139.32 101 "" "'9350 249654 SECURITY 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 139.32 341306 11/18/2010 127642 SANDVIK AND ASSOCIATES 200.00 MUSIC SERVICES 249932 10311OPS 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 200.00 341306 11/1812010 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 771.64 VALVE, SWITCH 00005186 249655 1060968 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 164.05 SEAT SLIDE 00005186 249656 1060997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 935.69 341307 11/18/2010 101961 SCHMITZ, THOMAS 291.02 TRAINING EXPENSES 249933 110910 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 562.78 TRAINING EXPENSES 249933 110910 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11, ,10 8:11:52 Page - 21 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 249584 CITY G. ,iNA SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 51.10 Council Check Register 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 790.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,620.00 853.80 8503 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 341308 11/18/2010 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 8504 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 98.07 PAINTING SUPPLIES 249521 4495 -8 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.81 PAINT 249522 4506 -2 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.88 42.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249754 341309 1111812010 ART WORK SOLD 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 42.00 40,824.57 MICROSOFT CONTRACT RENEWAL00004336 249710 B00126731 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 40,824.57 341310 11118/2010 249755 127619 SIEGEL, LISA 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.00 93.54 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249753 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 341316 11118/2010 93.54 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 341311 11/18/2010 16.10 120468 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES COR 00006360 249523 VI22627 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 150.00 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 00008055 249689 3211229 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 150.00 114.47- CREDIT 249657 341312 11/18/2010 REPAIR PARTS 124769 SISTERMAN, MATT 29.55 CAPSCREW BOLTS 11, ,10 8:11:52 Page - 21 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 249584 110910 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.10 341313 1111812010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 790.00 REGISTRATION FEES 249585 8497 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,620.00 249586 8503 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 329.00 249587 8504 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,739.00 341314 11/18/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 42.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249754 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.00 341316 11/18/2010 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 48.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249755 110810 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.00 341316 11118/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 16.10 RADIATOR CAP 00006360 249523 VI22627 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 105.96 FILTERS 00006360 249524 S182093 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 114.47- CREDIT 249657 SI82173 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.55 CAPSCREW BOLTS 00005355 249934 SI82197 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 240.76 CITY OF EDINA 341320 Council Check Register 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 49.35 HINGE, WIPER BLADE 00005312 249935 SI81972 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 86.49 341321 11/18/2010 341317 11/18/2010 100660 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 1,526.64 105.00 ALARM SERVICE 249525 1320126358 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CUSTOMER REFUND 105.00 1,526.64 341318 11/18/2010 117686 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 11/18/2010 101016 STREICHERS 988.40 CARTRIDGES 249526 105306544 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.98 988.40 249588 1782864 1400.6203 341319 11/1812010 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 22 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 240.76 SUBSCRIPTION 249527 493121 - 11/01810 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET UTILITY BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 459.00 249842 01342 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 972.00 249843 Z01933 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER .YORK SELLING 1,431.00 240.76 341320 11/18/2010 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 4,579.25 CONSULTING SERVICES 249528 8379 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 4,579.25 341321 11/18/2010 127620 STREETER & ASSOCIATES 1,526.64 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 249936 4617 TOWER ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 1,526.64 341322 11/18/2010 101016 STREICHERS 100.98 UNIFORMS 249588 1782864 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 100.98 341323 11/18/2010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 42.90 PUBLISH NOTICE 249589 1284953 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 35.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 249590 1284954 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 78.65 341324 11/18/2010 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 41.33 PHONE LISTING 249937 110410 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 41.33 PHONE LISTING 249937 110410 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 41.34 PHONE LISTING 249937 110410 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 124.00 341326 11/1812010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET UTILITY BALANCE SHEET POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 459.00 249842 01342 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 972.00 249843 Z01933 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER .YORK SELLING 1,431.00 R55CKREG 'LOG20000 CITY G. . _iNA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier) Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341326 11118/2016 124781, TALY, HENRY 51.00 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 249756 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11; 10 8:11:52 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER-REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 51.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL DATA PROCESSING 341327 11/1812010 LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 125136 TEAMINTEL LLC VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 588.00 1 YR SERVICE CONTRACT 249591 679 1400.6103 588.00 341328 11/18/2010 111364971 TENNIS WEST 8,629.00 SAFETY NET WORK 00001889 249938 10- 777 -1747 1642.6103 8,629.00 341329 11118_/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY- 1,150.00 249844 615963 5862.5514J.-. 125.60 249845 , 615962 ,. 5862.5515" 377.80- 249846 00720213 5421.5514 897.80 - 341330 11/18/2010 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 283.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 249939 2010 -43000 5822.6122 283.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 249939 2010 -43000 5842.6122 283.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 249939 2010 -43000 5862.6122 850.00 341331 11/18/2010 101474 TITLEIST 1,378.30 GOLF BALLS: 249690 2074726 5440.5511 i 720.00- CREDIT 249691 6003202 5440.5511 658:30 341332 11/18/2010 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 203.52 COPIER USAGE 249940 163957608 7410.6575 203.52 341333 11/18/2010' 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS - 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FILE 249941 25961 5820.6160 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FILE 249941 25961 5840.6160 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FILE 249941 25961 5860.6160 42.75 341334 11118/2010 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 3,150.00 INSTALL DOCUMENT CAMERA 249592 3404 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11; 10 8:11:52 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER-REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO'SHOP- PRO SHOP,RETAIL SALES PRINTING - PSTF ADMINISTRATION DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 — 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 24 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,150.00 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 341336 11/18/2010 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 12.40 BACKGROUND CHECKS 249593 10022705 1400.6103 12.40 341336 11/18/2010 127643 TSI INCORPORATED 782.17 CALIBRATIONS 00003813 249942 90381870 1470.6180 782.17 341337 11/1812010 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 70.00 HEP B TESTING 249977 101723938 1400.6175 70.00 341338 11/1812010 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 510.33 GRASS SEED 00001876 249943 24466 1643.6547 510.33 341339 11/1812010 103876 UCARE 445.46 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 249692 DOLOKHANOV 1470.4329 445.46 341340 11/1812010 120675 ULTRAMAX 426.00 TRAINING AMMO 00003152 249594 116963 1400.6104 426.00 341341 11/18/2010 126032 UN"ELECT USA 1,033.31 PARTS 249595 103110 1553.6530 1,033.31 341342 11/18/2010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 120.13 CUST43805514 249693 103110 5421.6406 285.70 CUST 43805514 249693 103110 5421.6511 3,274.10 CUST 43805514 249693 103110 5421.5510 3,679.93 341343 11/18/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 40.51 BLIND FLANGE 00001917 249658 268246 5913.6406 40.51 341344 11/18/2010 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.25 PAGER 249529 T6096083K 1550.6188 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 24 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SEED GENERAL TURF CARE AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY G. _MINA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 301.81 PAGERS 249978 T0319246K 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES 11, . X10 8:11:52 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING LIGHT & POWER RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 315.06 341346 11118/2010 122664 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 181.64 OXYGEN 00003649 249944 595392 1470.6510 181.64 341346 11/1812010 127644 VALUE PLUS FLOORING INC. 1,889.40 CARPET REPLACEMENT 00009290 249945 CG006629 5111.6710 1,889.40 341347 11/18/2010 102276 VAN BLOEM GARDENS 349.83 FLOWER BULBS 249949 2104759 5620.6620 349.83 341348 11/18/2010 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 28.07 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 249946 178725 -00 5862.6512 431.50 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001882 249947 179063 -00 1646.6406 518.45 CAN LINERS 00001873 249948 178322 -00 1645.6406 978.02 341349 11118/2010 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,074.93 WIRE FOR RINK LIGHTS 00001003 249950 4970825 1648.6530 624.67 WIRE FOR RINK LIGHTS 00001019 249979 4978874 1648.6530 1,699.60 341360 11/18/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 168.50 249737 0031950 -IN 5822.5512 168.50 341361 11/1812010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 213.14 ELEVATOR LIGHTING 249530 15166208 -00 1551.6185 213.14 341352 11/18/2010 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 338.37 DUMPSTER 00002014 249711 5735034 - 2282 -2 5630.6182 338.37 341363 11/1812010 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 504.00 OCT 2010 SERVICES 249596 821651892 1400.6103 504.00 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 11, . X10 8:11:52 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING LIGHT & POWER RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Council Check Register Page - 26 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341354 11118/2010 114688 WILSON, ROBERT C. 100.00 REIMBURSE FOR MSCA PROGRAM 249694 110810 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 100.00 341355 11/18/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 608.25 249847 255752 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,174.85 249848 255528 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,045.20 249849 255694 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,828.30 341356 1111812010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,147.73 249738 338767 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,248.98 249739 339051 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,471.14 249740 339052 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 73.12 249850 339829 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,503.92 249851 339833 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 525.60 249852 340020 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,940.37 249853 339832 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192.73 249854 339831 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,103.59 341357 11118/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5,449.79 249741 480002 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,625.75 249742 484808 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,129.60 249743 480003 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 705.86 249744 483234 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 99.33- 249745 814901 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15,098.13 249855 480004 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 226.97 249856 485636 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,573.96 249857 484817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,040.87 249858 484813 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,045.07 249859 484812 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 14,323.28 249860 484814 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 777.95 249861 484816 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 130.34 249862 484815 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8,628.20 249863 484810 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 71.95 249864 484811 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 114.32 249865 484809 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,676.30 249866 483632 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 517.30 249667 483617 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 129.05- 249868 814962 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,189.84 249980 467341 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY t,. _jINA 1 , j10 8:11:52 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 11/18/2010 - 11/18/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 71,097.10 341368 11/1812010 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,625.85 249869 678669 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.00 249870 678670 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,908.99 249871 677888 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,960.00 249872 678196 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,105.60 249873 680245 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,262,51 249874 680424 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12,884.95 341359 11/18/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 448.00 249875 256880 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 595.80 249876 256955 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,279.40 249877 256920 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 84.00 249878 256956 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 94.55 249879 257040 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,501.75 341360 11/1812010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 5,166.75 51- 6824328 -7 249531 259863717 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 15,127.26 51- 4888627 -1 249597 259266280 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4,623.98 51- 5888961 -7 249695 260018516 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 4,492.37 51- 5619094 -8 249696 260011354 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,103.27 51- 6121102 -5 249981 260161756 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22,150.19 51- 5605640 -1 249982 260352065 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 54,663.82 341361 11/18/2010 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 116.84 OCT USAGE 249951 051242293 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 116.84 341362 11/18/2010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 467.80 DIESEL FOR BLOWOUT 00006404 249532 406279 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 446.74 FUEL FOR BLOWOUT 00006404 249533 406510 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 433.29 FUEL FOR BLOWOUT 00006404 249534 406689 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 323.73 FUEL FOR BLOWOUT 00006404 249535 406950 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,671.56 341363 11118/2010 124960 ZAHL - PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE C 335.25 REPAIRS TO FUEL SYSTEM 00005393 249712 0165790 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 335.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 341364 11/18/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation 943,238.67 Grand Total 101091 ZIEGLER INC 2,440.51 COMPRESSOR RENTAL 1,050.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 865.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1,350.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1,050.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1,050.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1,350.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 9,605.51 5422.6180 943,238.67 Grand Total Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS . CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 943,238.67 Total Payments 943,238.67 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 28 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/18/2010 — 11/18/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00006459 249536 E7127301 5422.6180 00005308 249659 SW050154319 1553.6180 00005391 249660 SW050154320 1553.6180 00005390 249661 SV4050154321 1553.6180 00005309 249662 SW050154322 1553.6180 00005311 249663 SW050154323 1553.6180 00005310 249664 SW050154324 1553.6180 249983 E6395920 1551.6180 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS . CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 943,238.67 Total Payments 943,238.67 11/17/2010 8:11:52 Page - 28 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LuG20000 CITY C NA Council Check Summary 1111812010- 11/1812010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 184,222.07 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 8,144.54 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 54,460.97 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,132.65 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 64.13 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 611.83 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,467.54 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 383,275.20 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 6,056.10 05800 LIQUOR FUND 212,436.04 05900 UTILITY FUND 27,045.34 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 311.35 05950 RECYCLING FUND 37,683.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 327.91 Report Totals 943,238.67 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s a d procedures /a 11. 0 8:12:34 Page - 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 11119/2010 114403 ANDRUS, PAT CITY 6. ANA 151.13 Council Check Register 250044 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES, ELECTION 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /- Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341366 11/19/2010 127406 ABDULKADIR, EDNA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE i 250037 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 165.75 ' 341366 11/1912010 104617 .ACKER, RITA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250038 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 165.75 341367 11/1912010 127407 ADAMS, DOMINIC 11/19/2010 127409 BAILEY, ANN BLYTH 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250040 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 250047 111710 156.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 341368 11/19/2010 127406 ADAMS, KIANA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250039 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 146.25 341369 11/19/2010 120239 ALKIRE, DAVID 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 250041 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 216.56 341370 11119/2010 108555 ALT, JOHN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250042 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 341371 11/1912010 104518 ANDERSON, CAROLYN 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250043 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 160.88 Business Unit, ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION 341372 11119/2010 114403 ANDRUS, PAT 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 250044 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES, ELECTION 151.13 341373 11/19/2010 105389 APPEL, PATRICIA J. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250045 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 ' 341374 11/19/2010 127408 ATKIN, SARA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250046 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341375 11/19/2010 127409 BAILEY, ANN BLYTH 126.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250047 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11. 10 9:05:31 Page - 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check 126.75 341376 11/19/2010 11/19/2010 108667 BAULEKE, CHRIS 136.50. ELECTION JUDGE Account No Subledger Account Description 136.50 . 341377 11/1912010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 127094 BECKER, MARY 250049 111710 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 250050 160.88 1180.6013 341378 11/19/2010 250051 123160 BILLINGHAM, LISA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 1180.6013 146:25 ELECTION 341379 11/1912010 1180.6013 123486 BJELLAND, ERIC ELECTION 250054 39.00 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 39.00 111710 341380 11/19/2010 ELECTION 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 111710 1180.6013 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250057 111710 146.25 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341381 11/1912010 123161. BLOOSTON, JILL 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 151.13 341382 11/19/2010 106479 BOEMER, JULIET L. 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 158.44 341383 11/1912010 116939 BORGEN, HOLLY 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 156.00 341384 11/1912010 127098 BOVEN, EARL 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 163.31 ,. 341386 11119/2010 127410 BOWER, NATHAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 2 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250048 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250049 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250050 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES. ELECTION 250051 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250052 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250053 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250054 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250055' 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250056 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250057 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY C), _JINA 1Ti�_._u10905:31 Council Check Register Page - 3 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date ; j °Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 341386 11/19/2010 I 104580 BRADBURY,,KATHERINE 225.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250058 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 225.00 341387 11/19/2010 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250059 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 341388 11/19/2010 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 185.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250060 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 185.63 - 341389 11/19/2010 123152 BRONNER, KATHY 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 250061 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 341390 11/19/2010 106485 BURNETT, JAMES H. 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE, 250062 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES, TEMP EMPLOYEES. ELECTION r 160.88 341391 11119/2010 123153 BUSDICKER, HARRIET 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 250063 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION' 143.81' 341392 11/19/2010 127411 BUSH, MARGARET 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250064 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES iELECTION 160.88 341393 11/19/2010 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250065 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES•TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341394 11/19/2010 104584 CARDLE, JOHN 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250066 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341396 11/19/2010 117116 CARLSON, JOHN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250069 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341396 1.1119/2010 127412 CARLSON, NANCY 168.19 'ELECTION JUDGE 250068 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES . ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check Register 168.19 341397 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 117117 CARLSON, SANDRA PO # Doc No 191.25 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 191.25 111710 341398 11119/2010 ELECTION 127077 CARLSON, STEVEN 111710 1180.6013 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250071 111710 163.31 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341399 11/19/2010 111710 117118 CARMICHIEL, CAROL SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 48.75 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 48.75 250074 341400 11/19/2010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104624 CARROLL, PAULINE 250075 111710 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 250076 158.44 1180.6013 341401 11119/2010 250077 127413 CASPER, ANNA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 1180.6013 165.75 ELECTION 341402 11/1912010 106490 CHAMBERLAIN, MARSHA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 341403 11/19/2010 127414 CHARAN, SOPHIA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 163.31 341404 11/19/2010 123166 CHRISTIANSEN, MARILYN 177.94 ELECTION JUDGE 177.94 341406 11/1912010 114404 CIPOLLA, JUDY 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 227.81 341406 11/19/2010 104686 CONLEY, KATHERINE 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 160.88 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page- 4 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250070 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250067 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250071 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250072 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250073 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250074 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250075 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250076 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250077 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250078 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page- 4 CITY U. �;MA 11. 10 9:05:31 RSSCKREG LOG20000 _ . Council Check Register Page - 5 11/19/2010 -11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341407 1111912010 104526 COOKE, EILEEN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250079 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341408 11119/2010 104626 CRACRAFT, MARIAN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250080 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP: EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341409 1111912010 104629 CREW, COLLEEN 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 250081 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 341410 11/19/2010 106612 CRONSTROM, RICHARD 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250082 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 341411 1111912010 127416 DALE, BYRON 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250084 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341412 11119/2010 127416 DALE, JUDITH 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250083 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341413 11/19/2010 104530 DANIELSON, GLORIA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250085 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341414 11119/2010 127088 DAUTH, DANIEL 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250086 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341416 11/1912010 127076 DAMS, JEANNE 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 250087 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 341416 11119/2010 105069 DAWSON, PAT 219.73 ELECTION PHONE COVERAGE 250088 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.73 341417 11119/2010 120361 DEAN, FRED 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250089 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check 160.88 341418 11/1912010 11/19/2010 127417 DEHNEL, ANNIE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE Account No Subledger Account Description 170.63 250090 341419 11/1912010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 123168 DEMAREST, AMY 250091 111710 143.81' ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 250092 143.81 1180.6013 341420 11/1912010 250093 106513 DEZELLER, DELPHA . 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 1180.6013 156.00 ELECTION 341421 11119/2010 1180.6013 104631 DILL, PATRICIA ELECTION 250096 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES- ELECTION 219.38 111710 341422 11119/2010 ELECTION' 106518 DOMEK, CHARLOTTE 111710 1180.6013 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250099 111710 14.63 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341423 11/19/2010 120362 DOMKE, LISA 109.69 ELECTION JUDGE 109.69 341424 11/19/2010 108566 DOUGLAS, SUZANNE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 341426 11/19/2010 127084 DUHN, SHEILA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 160.88 341426 11/19/2010 123160 DUKE, SONTRUD 165.75 _ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 341427 11119/2010 127418 EHRICH, WILLIAM 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page- 6 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250090 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250091 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES " ELECTION 250092 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250093 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250094 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250095 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250096 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES- ELECTION 250097 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION' 250098 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250099 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page- 6 CITY (.; _jlNA 11.. 10 9:05:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341428 1111912010 123164 EIDAM, DON 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250160 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341429 11/1912010 120646 ELLINGBOE, SARAH 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250101 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341430 11/19/2010 127419 ELLIOTT, ELIZABETH 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250102 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - 156.00 341431 11/1912010 127420 ENGEBRETSON, JEANENE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250103 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341432 11/19/2010 127421 ENGLER, KYLE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250104 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 341433 11/19/2010 127078 FETTERMAN, LAURIE 219.38 ::ELECTION JUDGE 250105 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 341434 11/1912010 116948 FIEDLER, BOB 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 250106 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 341436 11119/2010 104534 FINK, PAUL 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250107 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 199.69 341436 11119/2010 - 127422 FLINT, ERICA 121.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250108 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - 121.88 341437 1111912010 116949 FLINT, LISA 63.38 ELECTION JUDGE 250109 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 63.38 341438. 11/19/2010 116950 FLOR, ARDELLE 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250110 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - R55CKREG LOG20000 ._ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Page - 8 146.25 11119/2010 341439 11/1912010 127086 FOSSUM, JOHN Inv No Account No 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 250111 111710 151.13 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341440 11/19/2010 111710 106628 FRANA, VIOLA SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 148.69 250114 341441 11119/2010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104688 FREDERICK, REBECCA 250115 11.1710 19.50 ELECTION. JUDGE ELECTION 250116 19.50 1180.6013 341442 11119/2010 250117 123167 FREY, GINNY 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 1180.6013 233.44 . 341443 11/19/2010 1180.6013 127423 GAASEDELEN, ERIK ELECTION 250120 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 341444 11/19/2010 127424 GABRIEL, ELIZA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 341446 11/19/2010 127426 GAUMER, GAYLE 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 19.50 341446 17/19/2010 127426 GERAGHTY, BRIEGE - 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 341447 11/19/2010 - 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE 385.31 ELECTION JUDGE 385.31 341448 11/19/2010 116961 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH 174.38 ELECTION JUDGE 174.38 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 8 11119/2010 - 11/2512010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250111 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250112 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250113 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250114 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250115 11.1710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP- EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250116 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250117 -111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250118 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250119 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250120 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG -: LOG20000 CITY u.. _JINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341449 11/19/2010 127427 GORDON, KATIE - 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250121 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 341460 11/19/2010 106636 GOTTESMAN, CAROL 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250122 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341451 11/19/2010 103889 GRETTE, MYRTLE ,. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250123 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES .- ELECTION 165.75 341452 11/19/2010 127428 HA, VIVIAN 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250124 111710 1180.6613 SALARIES.TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341453 11/19/2010 106510 HABECK, MUZA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250125 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341454 11/19/2010 120369 HALLORAN, BARBARA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250126 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341466 11119/2010 106666 HAMAN,'EUGENE E. 196.68 ELECTION JUDGE 250127 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88. 341456 11/19/2010 - 106668 HANS. MARY ANN 146.25 :. ELECTION JUDGE 250128 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341467 11/19/2010 120269 HANSEN, BRIAN -160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250129 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341458 11/19/2010 117134 HANSEN, JUDITH 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250130 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 341459 11/19/2010 120372 HARRIS GEORGE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250131 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11 ; - -"010 9:05:31 Page- 9 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Pager 10 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 - Check # Date Amount I Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - 'Subledger.Account Description Business Unit. ' 341460 11/19/2010 108570 HARTFELDT, SHAWN 109.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250132 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP`EMPLOYEES ELECTION 109.69 341461 11/19/2010 - :;123503 HATZUNG;LISA 165.75, ELECTION JUDGE. 250133 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES "ELECTION 165.75 341462 11/19/2010 123604. ~HAYDOCK, CHERIE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE - . 250134. 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341463 11119/2010 127079 HED, SHARON, 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE .250135 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341464 11/19/2010 117136 HEGMAN, JACQUELINE ' 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 250136 111710 1180:6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 341466 11/19/2010 106576 HELEY, CHERYL - 112.13 ELECTION JUDGE:, 250137 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 112.13 341466 11/19/2010 123174 HENDERSON, MARY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250138 111710 11E0.6013 SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES' ELECTION 146.25 341467 11119/2010 117137 HIDEM, JANICE 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250139 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341468 11/19/2010 127429 HIGGINS, JAMES 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250140 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341469 11/19/2010 123507 HOLDEN, WILLIAM 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250141 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION , 156.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 i CITY Or EDINA Council Check Register . 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplies / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341470 11119/2010 104603 HORTON, ANNETTE 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250142 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341471 11/19/2010 108673 HUDOBA, TERRI 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 250143 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 341472 11119/2010 127430 HUGHES, SHANNON 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250144 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 341473 11/19/2010 105397 HYKES, MYRA 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250145 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 341474 11/19/2010 106694 ISAACSON, DELORES 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250146 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341475 11/19/2010 127431 JENSEN, KATHERINE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 250147 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 341476 11119/2010 120376 JIWANI, SUZANNE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 250148 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 341477 11/19/2010 106598 JOHNSON, ALLEN C. 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250152 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 14.63 341478 11/19/2010 .", 127432 JOHNSON, AVERY 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250151 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 341479 11/1912010 104606 JOHNSON, KATE 309.38 ELECTION JUDGE 250153 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 309.38 341480 11/19/2010 127433 JOHNSON, KELSEY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250150 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/;&.1/2010 9:05:31 Page - 11 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 -11/25/2010 Check # TDate Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description i;165.75 i 341481 11/19/2010 106600 JOHNSON, SHIRLEY M. Business Unit 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 12 :163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250149 111710' 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION' 163.31 341482 11/19/2010 123610 JOST, MARCE 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250154 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 341483 11/1912010. 106608 KACHAN, MARY K. 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250155 111710' 1180.6013' SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341484 11/1912010 106538 KAPAUN, ANN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250156 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341485 11119/2010 123513 KATZ, DALIA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250157 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES- ELECTION 163.31 341486 1,1/19/2010 127434 KAVANAUGH, OLIVIA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250158 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.86 341487 11/19/2010 116349 KAY, KATIE 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 250159 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 341488 11/19/2010 106639 KEENAN, ANN 191.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250160 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION i 191.25 341489 11/1912010 123614 KERZNER, DOROTHY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250161 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341490 1111912010 127436 KIDDER, REBECCA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250162 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 12 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY C,. _JINA 11 __...010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 13 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341491 11119/2010 127086 KIEDROWSKI, LESLIE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250163 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341492 11119/2010 127436 KING, OLIVIA 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250164 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341493 11/19/2010 106640 KINGSTON, JESSICA 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 250165 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 341494 11/19/2010 106641 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250166 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341495 11/1912010 105399 KOESTER, MARCIA 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250167 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 341496 11119/2010 106543 KOPP, JANET 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250168 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341497 11/19/2010 106646 KOSTERS, JULIA 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250169 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 341498 11/19/2010 123177 KRINSKY -LEON, KAREN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 250177 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 341499 11/19/2010 106548 KUETHER, DOROTHY 75.56 ELECTION JUDGE 250170 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 75.56 341500 11119/2010 123179 LANDBERG, JAMES 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250171 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341601 11/1912010 106650 LANDBERG, MARY 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250172 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check 160.88 341502 11/1912010 11/19/2010 121626 LANE, PAUL 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE Account No Subledger Account Description 165.75 250173 341603 11/19/2010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 127437 LAPPIN, GERTRUDE 250174 111710 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 250175 165.75 1180.6013 341504 11/19/2010 250176 127438 LARKIN, FRANCIS 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 1180.6013 160.88 ELECTION 341606 11/19/2010 1180.6013 123182 LEER, BONNIE ELECTION 250180 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 111710 341506 11/1912010 ELECTION 127439 LINDHOLM, ALEXANDRA 111710 1180.6013 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250183 111710 160.88 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341607 11/19/2010 106667 LINDSEY, ROBERT 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 341608 11/19/2010 127104 LOEWENBERG, ELLEN 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 151.13 341609 11/19/2010 127089 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 156.00 341610 11/1912010 120249 LUCAS, WILLIAM 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 141.38 341611 11/19/2010 127440 LUEDTKE, ANDREW 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 14 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250173 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250174 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250175 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250176 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250178 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250179 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250180 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250181 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250182 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250183 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 14 11iza/2010 9:05:31 Page- 15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY,-. cDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341612 11/19/2010 123183 MAEDER, BARBARA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250184 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION -160.88 341513 11/19/2010 108674 MAETZOLD, LINDA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250185 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 �- 341514 11119/2010 127441 MALONE, JULIA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250186 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES - ELECTION 165.75 341516 11/19/2010 120385 MASE, CONNIE 97.50 ELECTION JUDGE - 250187 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 97.50 341516 11/19/2010 120386 MAST, BOYD 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250188 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341617 11119/2010 127442 MATHIS, TEDI 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250189 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341618 11/1912010 117148 MAYNARD, JOAN 177.94 ELECTION JUDGE 250190 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.94 341619 11119/2010 106686 MCFARLANE, BARBARA 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250191 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP - EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 341620 11/19/2010 104646 MCGLYNN, ROSEMARY - 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250192 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341621 11/1912010 106589 MCGOLDRICK, FRANCIS 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250193 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341522 11/19/2010 106692 MCHENRY, JOY 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250194 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11iza/2010 9:05:31 Page- 15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descri ption Business Unit 14.63 341523 11/19/2010 127443 MCLELLAN, KATHERINE 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250195 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES- ELECTION 160.88 341524 11/1912010 127092 MCMILLAN, JOAN 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250196 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341525 11/19/2010 104547 MELICHAR, MARGARET C. 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 250197 111710 A180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 341526 11/19/2010 104612 MELLER, JANE 121.68 ELECTION JUDGE 250198 111710. 1180:6013 SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 121.88 341627 11119/2010 120388 MERTZ, GARY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250199 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341628 11/19/2010 127087 MILLER, KAREN 156:00 ELECTION JUDGE 250201 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 1 341529 11/19/2010 116961 MILLER, NANCY 205.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250200 111710 - 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES- ELECTION 205:31 341630 11/19/2010 127444 MITCHELL, CASEY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250202 111710, 1180:6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 ' 341531 11/19/2010 127090 MOBERG, JANET 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250203 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP. EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 341532 11119/2010 116963 MOLLICK, LOUISE 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250204 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 16 11i-_.-010 9:05:31 Page- 17 CITY OF EDINA 1455CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341633 11/1912010 106606 MONTEZ, PATRICIA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250205 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341634 11/19/2010 104661 MONTGOMERY, BETH 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 250206 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 210.94 341636 11119/2010 116964 MOTL, LARRY 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 250207 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 341636 11/19/2010 127446 MULLIS, CHRIS 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250208 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341637 11/1912010 106888 NAAE, RON 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250209 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 230.63 341638 11119/2010 120393 NAZARIAN, BARBARA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250210 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341639 11/1912010 127446 NUNN, JAMES 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250211 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341640 11/19/2010 120264 O'NEILL, ORDELL 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250217 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341641 11/1912010 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 376.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250212 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 376.88 341642 11/1912010 123629 OLSEN, CAROL 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250214 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341643 11/1912010 123630 OLSEN, NEIL 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250213 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11i-_.-010 9:05:31 Page- 17 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 18 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 163.31 341644 11/19/2010 127447 OLSON, CHLOE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250215 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341546 11/19/2010 127448 OLSTAD, HANNAH 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250216 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341546 11/19/2010 123194 OWENS, NORMAN 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250218 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 213.75 341647 11/19/2010 106631 PAULSON, DARLA J 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250219 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341648 11119/2010 127106 PAULSON, MILDRED 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250220 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 14.63 341649 11/1912010 120256 PEARCE, JEAN 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE. 250221 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 341650 11/1912010 123195 PEARCE, WAIN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250222 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341661 11/1912010 127449 PEDERSON, EMILY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250223 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341552 11/19/2010 127099 PETERMANN, HEATHER 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250224 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341663 11119/2010 127082 PETERSEN, CHRISTIAN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250227 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 CITY L. MINA 1' . 10 9:05:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 11/19/2010 -11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341564 11119/2010 127080 PETERSEN, DEWAYNE 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250226 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341655 11119/2010 127102 PETERSEN, EDWARD 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250228 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 14.63 341566 11119/2010 106637 PETERSEN, SUSAN 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250225 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341567 11/19/2010 120257 PETERSON, JOHN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250229 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341668 11/19/2010 104556 POLLITT, BETTY 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250230 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 341559 11/19/2010 104618 PRESTHUS, LINDA 121.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250231 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 121.88 341560 11/1912010 127461 PRONOVE, ALMA 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250233 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341661 11/1912010 127460 PRONOVE, FELIX 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250232 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341662 11/1912010 120269 REED, ROBERT 16819 ELECTION JUDGE 250234 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 341663 11/19/2010 127462 REHNBERG, ERIK 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250235 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341664 11119/2010 127453 REININGER, KAYLA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250236 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11119/2010 -11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 165.75 341566 11119/2010 106564 ROBERTSON, LOIS M 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250237 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341666 11/19/2010 106276 RODGERS, JUDITH 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 250238 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 341567 11/1912010 127081 RODGERS, WILLIAM 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250239 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341668 11/19/2010 122600 ROE, JOAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250240 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341669 11/1912010 123635 ROGAS, LEE 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250241 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341670 11/19/2010 106667 ROGERS, MARY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 250242 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 341671 11119/2010 127454 ROSE, EMILY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250243 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341672 11119/2010 127466 ROSENLUND, MARYANN 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250244 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341673 11/1912010 120261 ROSENTHAL- ERICKSON, LUANN 250.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250245 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250.31 341674 11/19/2010 106404 RUSTAD, MARK 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 250246 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 210.94 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 20 CITY C,. _-jINA 1'. .109:05:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 11119/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341576 11119/2010 105406 RYAN, MARY E. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250247 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341576 11/19/2010 127456 SALTER, REBECCA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250248 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 341677 11/1912010 120404 SANCHEZ, MARILYN 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250249 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 14.63 341678 11/19/2010 123199 SAWATZKY, RANDY 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250250 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 341579 11119/2010 127467 SCHMIEL, ANNA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250251 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341680 11119/2010 127458 SCHOENING, ALEX 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250252 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 341581 11/1912010 106567 SCHRAMM, CONSTANCE E. 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250253 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 341682 11119/2010 120263 SCHROEDER, PAUL 170.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250254 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.50 341683 11/19/2010 127459' SCHULBERG, ANNE 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250255 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 341684 11119/2010 121624 SCOFIELD, CRAIG 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250256 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341686 11/1912010 120264 SCOTT, AMY 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250257 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 22 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv-No. Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 163.31 341686 11/19/2010 106596 SELID, MARION P. 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250258 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341687 11/19/2010 127460 SERGENT- LEVENTHAL, MIMI 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250259_ 111710 1180.6013' SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341688 11/19/2010 127095 SEWELL, KATHERINE 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250260 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341689 11119/2010 121626 SHEA, LINCOLN 14.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250261 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 14.63 341690 11/1912010 127461 SHEEHAN, TIM 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250262 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341691 11/19/2010 127093 SHEEHY, JULIE 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250263 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341592 11/1912010 124803 SKELLY, MICHAEL 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250264- 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341693 11119/2010 123204 SKOY, MARY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250265 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341694 11/19/2010 123206 SKUMATZ, JOANN 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250266 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341696 11/1912010 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 250267 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 CITY l,. ,NA 11. 10 9:05:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341596 11/19/2010 127097 SMITH, SUSAN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 250268 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 341597 11/19/2010 127075 SNYDER, LORI 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250269 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 341598 11/19/2010 127462 SOMMERVILLE, AIMEE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 250270 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 341599 11/19/2010 104626 STANGLER, GISELE 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250271 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341600 11/19/2010 127463 STANKIEWICZ, KRZYSZTOF 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250272 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341601 11/1912010 120267 STANLEY, LYNNE 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250273 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341602 11/19/2010 123208 STEBLAY, VIVIAN 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250274 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 341603 11/19/2010 106622 STRANG, LEE M 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250275 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341604 11/1912010 120416 SULLIVAN, DON 185.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250276 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 185.25 341605 11/19/2010 123209 SWANSON, ANN 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250277 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 341606 11/19/2010 123210 SWEET, PHILOTHEA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250278 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 160.88 Council Check 341607 11/19/2010 127464 THIBEAU, NICK 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 160.88 PO # Doc No 341608 11/19/2010 Account No 108593 THOMPSON, ANN Business Unit 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 168.19 ELECTION 341609 11/1912010 111710 127465 THOMPSON, NELS SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 148.69 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341610 11/19/2010 250282 116976 TIGGAS, ANDREA 1180.6013 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250283 213.75 1180.6013 341611 11/19/2010 ELECTION 106626 TINDALL, JAMES W 111710 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 160.88 111710 341612 11/19/2010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 127466 TRAN, NGOC 250286 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 158.44 250287 341613 11/19/2010 1180.6013 127467 TUNESI, LIDA ELECTION 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 165.75 ELECTION 341614 11/19/2010 116977 ULMER, BETTY 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 160.88 341616 11/19/2010 116978 ULMER, ROBERT 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 341616 11119/2010 106629 ULVIN, JANET M 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 210.94 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 24 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/2512010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250279 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250280 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250281 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250282 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250283 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250284 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250285 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250286 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250287 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250288 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 24 R55CKREG _JG20000 CITY (. NA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/2512010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341617 11/19/2010 104627 VAURIO, PATRICIA 39.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250289 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 39.00 341618 11/19/2010 116979 VOSS, RAY Business Unit ELECTION 11,. ;10 9:05:31 Page - 25 148.69 ELECTION JUDGE 250290 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 148.69 341619 11/1912010 127468 WANDER, TERRY 177.94 ELECTION JUDGE 250291 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.94 341620 11/19/2010 106638 WASHBURN, VIRGINIA 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 250292 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 210.94 341621 11/1912010 105410 WATKINS, JOAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250293 '111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 341622 11/19/2010 116981 WEBER, JENNY 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 250294- 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 341623 11/19/2010 108697 WEEKS, DEANNA 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 250295 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 341624 11/19/2010, 123212 WEHRMEISTER, PAUL - 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 250296 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 341626 11/19/2010 127470 WEICHT, ERIC 156.00 ELECTION JUDGE 250298 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 156.00 341626 11/19/2010 - 127469 WEICHT; PATTY 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 250297 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP.EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 341627 11/19/2010 127471 WEINERT,.SASHA 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 250299 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check 136.50 341628 11/1912010 11/19/2010 108698 WELBAUM, MIKE 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE Account No Subledger Account Description 151.13 250300 341629 11/1912010 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106640 WESTERDAHL, BIRDIE. 250301 111710 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 250302 165.75 1180.6013 341630 11119/2010 250303, 127472 WHALEY, MERRIT • SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 111710 1180.6013 170.63 ELECTION 341631 11/1912010 1180.6013 104632 WOLD, LORETTA ELECTION 250306 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 111710 341632 11119/2010 ELECTION 127473 WOLFE, ROBERT v 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 250308 111710 160.88 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 341633 11/19/2010 118368' WOLFF, SARA 117.00 ELECTION JUDGE 117.00 341634 11/19/2010 123217 WOXLAND, KATHRYN 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 216.56 341636 11/19/2010 104634 YEE, MARY 107.25 ELECTION JUDGE 107.25 341636 11/19/2010 127101 21ERDEN, DEBORAH 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 146.25 341637 11/19/2010 111696 ZVERINOVA, MARGARET 78.00 ELECTION JUDGE 78.00 250309 ' 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA - 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 26 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250300 111710 -1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250301 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250302 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250303, 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250304 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250305 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250306 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250307 111710 1180:6013 ,- _ SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION v 250308 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250309 ' 111710 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG -jG20000 CITY U. _-jINA 11 - -j109:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 27 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341638 11/25/2010 100613 AAA 9.50 LICENSE RENEWAL 26-192 249984 111610 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.50 341639 11126/2010 100716 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 150.00 SEPT ADMIN FEE 250605 0017376 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 534.20 SEPT HRA ADMIN 250606 0017301 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 534.20 OCT HRA ADMIN 250607 0017586 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 218.00 OCT ADMIN FEE 250608 0017656 -IN 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,436.40 341640 1112512010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 11.80 250310 0808058 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 26.00 250445 0724855 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 37.80 341641 11/25/2010 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 96.43 PEST CONTROL 250609 603995 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 96.43 341642 11/26/2010 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 34.74 ALARM SERVICE 250352 35699558 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 34.74 341643 11/2512010 119813 AERIAL PAINTING INC. 3,100.00 PAINT POLES 00001035 250353 0019375 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,100.00 341644 11126/2010 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 167.95 COFFEE 250354 126800 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 167.95 341645 11/25/2010 106262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 1,465.00 COMPRESSOR MAINTENANCE 250610 18950 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,465.00 341646 11126/2010 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 792.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250577 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 792.00 341647 1112512010 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 908.27 COPIER PAPER 249985 10263350 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 908.27 341648 11/25/2010 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 420.00 GIFT SHOP HELP 250578 111910 5120.6103 420.00 341649 11/2612010 124433 ANDERSON, MARLYN J 48.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250579 111910 5110.6103 48.00 341650 11/26/2010 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 4,254.00 PREMIUM 250611 6100000121924 1550.6200 4,254.00 PREMIUM 250612 6100000123390 1550.6200 8,508.00 341661 11/26/2010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 779.63 FOOD 250613 1459519 5421.5510 779.63 341652 11/2512010 104346 BARCLAYAUDIO 9,235.00 SOUND SYSTEM UPGRADE 00002210 249986 110910 5600.1741 9,235.00 341663 11/26/2010 100644 BARRETT MOVING AND STORAGE 1,232.00 MOVE ELECTION EQUIPMENT 249987 B283- 1141 -0/1 1180.6103 1,414.00 MOVE ELECTION EQUIPMENT 250614 B283 - 1139 -0/1 1180.6103 2,646.00 341654 11/25/2010 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 4.26 BATTERIES 249988 018- 217860 1400.6406 4.26 341655 11/2512010 120517 BEITEL, DAWN 107.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 250616 111910 1600.6107 107.50 341656 11126/2010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,823.25 250311 54904400 5842.5513 78.48 250312 84450600 5842.5515 270.15 250446 54904700 5822.5513 251.05 250447 55852200 5822.5512 290.20 250448 55834000 5822.5513 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE INSURANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GRILL MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION ELECTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG �OG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 140.55 ASSESSING 224.20 250453 854.35 5862.5514 720.30 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 855.50 - 11/25/2010 41.00 2,614.50 Inv No 904.30 Subledger Account Description 9,067.83 250449 341667 11126/2010 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 552.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 552.00 55737200 341658 11/26/2010 126139 BERNICK'S WINE 250580 111910 5110.6103 CITY t- _jINA ASSESSING 11,_ -J109:05:31 250453 Council Check Register 5862.5514 Page - 29 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 11119/2010 - 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250449 55737100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 250450 55737200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 250451 54904600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 250452 55852400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 250678 54904500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 250679 55834100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 250680 55834200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 250681 55852300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 250580 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION I COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 385.00 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES 250453 13033 5862.5514 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 385.00 341659 11/2612010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 70.51 DVD SLEEVES 249989 WO- 655943 -1 2210.6406 158.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 249990 WO- 657332 -1 1190.6406 89.77 ADDRESS LABELS 250355 OE- 240837 -1 1140.6406 130.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250356 OE- 240991 -1 5841.6406 473.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009709 250615 OE- 239729 -1 5110.6513 922.18 341660 11/26/2010 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 320.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250581 111910 5110.6103 320.00 341661 11/26/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 58.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 250357 64200 1552.6530 21.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 250358 64172 1552.6530 80.25 341662 11/2612010 102087 BONESTROO 581.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 250617 183866 1600.6103 581.00 341663 11126/2010 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 778.32 250454 101516 5842.5513 179.00 250455 100689 5862.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION I COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 30 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 957.32 341664 11125/2010 102813 BOWMAN, ROBERT 50.05 ART WORK SOLD 250568 110910 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.05 341665 1112512010 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 478.81 REPAIR KIT, SENDER 00005360 250359 462758 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.16 HOSE ASSEMBLY, CLAMPS 00005322 250360 462764 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 187.03- CREDIT 00005113 250361 440736 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 203.76- CREDIT 00001372 250362 430501 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.18 341666 11/2512010 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 10.29 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 17.81 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20.00 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 29.50 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 33.68 PETTY CASH -250618 111910 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 38.76 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.96 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 44.00 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 47.18 PETTY CASH 250618 111910 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES �RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 285.18 341667 1112612010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,234.25 MATERIALS TESTING 250619 325739 01379.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -379 44TH ST BRKSIDE &THIELEN 248.50 MATERIALS TESTING 250620 325880 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 1,557.25 MATERIALS TESTING 250621 323268 01360.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 3,040.00 341668 11/2512010 127684 BREEDEN, CAROLINE 102.05 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 250674 5113 LINCOLN DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 102.05 341669 11/26/2010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 177.00 REPAIR DOOR 00001037 250363 514495S 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 177.00 341670 11/2612010 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 414.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250582 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 414.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 250313 13506 5822.5514 CITY L .INA 16.20 250314 13507 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 250315 13509 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 126.60 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 5842.5515 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341671 11126/2010 127686 BURNETTITLE 45.96 249991 2085842 40.07 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 250675 6001 KELLOGG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 2085362 5620.6186 40.07 1,988.68 341672 11/26/2010 1112612010 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 96.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 250583 111910 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 408.95 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250583 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 118680 CITY OF EDINA 336.00 4,170.00 341673 11/26/2010 111810 119465 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,170.00 11, X10 9:05:31 Page - 31 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 869.15 250313 13506 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.20 250314 13507 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,540.20 250315 13509 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 126.60 250316 13510 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 341674 11/25/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 225.00 250456 88376 5842.5513 1,140.00 250457 88400 5842.5513 1,365.00 341676 11/2612010 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 45.96 249991 2085842 5311.6186 1,942.72 249992 2085362 5620.6186 1,988.68 341676 1112612010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 408.95 250317 432193 5842.5514 408.95 341677 11/26/2010 118680 CITY OF EDINA 4,170.00 APPLIED TO ACCT IN ERROR 250364 111810 5900.2015 4,170.00 341678 11/26/2010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 6,229.37 00103426- 0345052006 250365 345052006 -11/10 1552.6189 257.73 00086676- 0330288022 250366 330288022 -11/10 5310.6189 6,487.10 341679 11/26/2010 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 29.84 WINDOW CLEANING 250367 474285 5861.6180 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING HEAT HEAT POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CUSTOMER REFUND SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL ADMINISTRATION VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 32 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 32.98 WINDOW CLEANING 250367 474285 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 51.98 WINDOW CLEANING 250367 474285 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 114.80 341682 11/26/2010 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 341680 1112612010 123941 CLAY, CAROL 72.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 250623 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250584 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 11,144.47 5125.6103 1600.6107 5921.6406 1550.6230 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENT SVC PW BUILDING GRILL GRILL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 120.00 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 341681 11/26/2010 YORK SELLING 116304 CLAY, DON COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 343.88 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 250585 111910 343.88 341682 11/26/2010 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 72.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 250623 111910 72.50 341683 1112612010 124331 COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE CHEMICA 1,099.76 DEGREASER 00001934 250368 40584 1,099.76 341684 11/26/2010 124684 CT TECHNOLOGIES 685.00 TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 249993 11447 685.00 341686 11/26/2010 104020 DALCO 30.87 URINAL SCREENS 00001454 250369 2271307 179.35 COMET, WINDEX 00006330 250624 2270563 210.22 341686 11/25/2010 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 65.75 DAIRY 250625 110810 65.75 341687 11/2512010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 22.40 250318 577355 1,849.20 250319 577354 4,977.80 250320 577356 52.40 250321 577357 3,285.17 250458 577353 957.50 250459 577771 11,144.47 5125.6103 1600.6107 5921.6406 1550.6230 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENT SVC PW BUILDING GRILL GRILL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O, NA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 341688 11/25/2010 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 52.59 BAKERY 250626 350199 5421.5510 52.59 341689 11125/2010 103013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 20.00 YEARLY BUYERS CARD 250627 110910 5820.6260 20.00 YEARLY BUYERS CARD 250627 110910 5840.6260 20.00 YEARLY BUYERS CARD 250627 110910 5860.6260 60.00 341690 11/25/2010 121268 DIRR, ALEX 466.00 MAINTENANCE 250586 111910 5111.6103 466.00 341691 1112512010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 3,783.08 CHEMICALS 00001215 250370 82701838 -10 5915.6586 3,783.08 341692 11/25/2010 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 573.97 WIRE, HOLE SAW, RECEPTACLES 00001025 250371 07645500 1322.6530 573.97 341693 11/25/2010 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 115.02 OCT WASHES 250372 4423 1553.6238 115.02 341694 11/25/2010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 712.50 TIF CALCULATIONS 249994 342077 1000.1303 712.50 341696 11/26/2010 106213 EMSAR INC. 1,021.17 COT MAINTENANCE 250373 SI -16569 1470.6215 1,021.17 341696 1112512010 123791 ERICKSON, MINDY 88.75 ART WORK SOLD 250569 111610 5101.4413 88.75 341697 11/25/2010 127686 ERICKSON, TIM 350.00 REGISTRATION REFUND 250676 111910 4077.4390 350.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS 11/. . 0 9:05:31 Page - 33 Business Unit GRILL 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD REGISTRATION FEES ART CENTER REVENUES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION R55CKREG LOG20000 550.41 CITY OF EDINA 00001851 250374 13856 -10- 100375 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP Council Check Register M 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341698 11125/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 341701 11/2612010 119211 FIRSTLAB 247.52 MOTOR AND FAN ASSEMBLY 00005297 249995 69- 024759 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 192.87- CREDIT 249996 1- 3496958 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 00324157 1550.6121 54.65 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 341699 11/26/2010 250630 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,715.35 FAN 00003837 250628 6812 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,715.35 341702 11/25/2010 341700 11/2512010 108544 FIRENET SYSTEMS INC. 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 34 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 550.41 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 00001851 250374 13856 -10- 100375 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP M 550.41 341701 11/2612010 119211 FIRSTLAB 78.00 DRUG SCREENING 250629 00324157 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 421.00 DRUG SCREENING 250630 00334328 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 499.00 341702 11/25/2010 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,379.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250587 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,379.00 341703 11/25/2010 100764 G & K SERVICES 63.69 SHOP TOWELS 249997 1006657810 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 64.15 SHOP TOWELS 249998 1006679828 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 127.84 341704 11/2512010 127386 GARAGE DOOR STORE 285.86 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00005398 249999 17013 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 285.86 L 341705 11/25/2010 106508 GEMPLER'S INC. 139.85 WORK PANTS 00001909 250375 1016366351 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 139.85 341706 11/26/2010 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 171.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250588 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 171.00 341707 11/26/2010 127581 GLACKEN & ASSOCIATES 275.00 BACKGROUND INVESTGATION COURSE 250631 10 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG _. G20000 CITY L.. ANA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledner Account Description 5210.5510 5410.6107 1260.6577 1553.6406 1553.6530 5422.6406 1325.6406 1325.6406 5913.6406 5913.6406 5862.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 1314.6180 5110.6103 1552.6530 11,. 10 9:05:31 Page - 35 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING 275.00 341708 11/26/2010 102385 GOLF MINNESOTA 225.00 GOLF GUIDES 00006162 250376 1001 225.00 341709 11/25/2010 103865 GRANN, LEON 364.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 250632 111810 364.00 341710 11/26/2010 101103 GRAINGER 378.26 WHEEL, LEVEL 00001016 250000 9390411040 342.91 BINS, GLOVES 00005394 250001 9393755864 69.51 LEVERLOCK RINGS 00005307 250002 9391105450 139.16 LIGHTS, BLADES 00006476 250003 9382955632 27.26 WRENCH BOXES 00001004 250377 9388954779 110.19 PLIERS, BATTERIES 00001004 250378 9387715726 41.71 CLEAN WIPES 00001928 250379 9391819480 22.90 RAGS, BATTERIES 00001928 250380 9391105468 1,131.90 341711 11/25/2010 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 224.00 250460 00026128 224.00 341712 1112612010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 196.50 250461 124129 2,881.25 250462 124130 1,727.00 250463 124135 4,804.75 341713 11/25/2010 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 351.25 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001043 250381 103233 351.25 341714 11125/2010 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 1,485.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250589 111910 1,485.00 341716 11125/2010 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 44.11 FUSE, TRANSFORMER 00001033 250382 71183 -0 44.11 5210.5510 5410.6107 1260.6577 1553.6406 1553.6530 5422.6406 1325.6406 1325.6406 5913.6406 5913.6406 5862.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 1314.6180 5110.6103 1552.6530 11,. 10 9:05:31 Page - 35 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341716 11125/2010 126270 HARTFORD 4.85 ID# 007739140009 LOGIS GROUP 250622 LOGIS GROUP 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 4.85 341717 11/2612010 101255 HASLER INC. 144.82 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 00004009 250383 13409191 1550.6235 POSTAGE 144.82 341718 11125/2010 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 12.50 REIMBURSE SUPPLIES 250590 111910 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 225.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250590 111910 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 237.50 341719 11/26/2010 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 656.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001032 250384 210108078 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE 156.00 SILS /CAL SUPPORT 250385 24 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 812.00 341720 11/25/2010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 36 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 68.40 TAPE CLEANING CARTRIDGE 00004386 250386 48514321 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 263.70 PDU FOR PD SERVER RACK 00004385 250387 46511400 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 332.10 341721 11/25/2010 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,028.50 250322 541022 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 250464 541020 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,506.00 250465 541019 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 341722 11126/2010 101233 IA A PA 539.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 250004 111510 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 539.00 341723 1112512010 123703 IMPRIMUS FORENSIC SERVICES LLC - 4,000.00 WORKSHOP 250633 636 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 4,000.00 341724 11126/2010 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 260.99 POLYCARBONATE SHEET 00005320 250005 630164 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 260.99 R55CKREG .jG20000 CITY L. MINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 341726 11/26/2010 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 187.50 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 250006 D217298 -IN 1400.6230 187.50 11,. .10 9:05:31 Page- 37 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 341726 11/26/2010 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 49.96 2011 BUDGET COVERS 250007 87315 1160.6405 BOOKS 8 PAMPHLETS FINANCE 17.83 BUDGET COVERS 250008 87351 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 119.30 POOL/SPA INSPECTION FORMS 250009 87354 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 187.09 341727 11/2612010 127184 IVERSON, KATHLEEN 74.75 ART WORK SOLD 250570 110210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.75 341728 11/26/2010 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 2,225.07 EXIT SIGNS 00001701 250388 4294481 -01 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 59.39- CREDIT 250389 4507180 -01 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,165.68 341729 11/26/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 158.80 250466 1443556 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,870.80 250466 1443556 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,090.91 250467 1443563 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 95.40 250468 1443564 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,103.65 250469 1443554 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 39.05 250470 1443555 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 385.00 250634 1043350 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 18,743.61 341732 11125/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 35.37 250471 1948249 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,557.49 250472 1948248 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,730.90 250473 1948250 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,266.74 250474 1948246 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 235.12 250475 1948243 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 405.60 250476 1944894 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 31.37 250477 1948231 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,511.22 250478 1948230 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,754.02 250479 1948232 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 220.14 250480 1948229 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,239.06 250481 1948228 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 1,201.38 250482 1948227 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 3E 11/1912010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,437.82 250483 1948226 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 22.11 250484 1948237 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,394.30 250485 1948236 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 250486 1948233 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,973.75 250487 1948242 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,897.43 250488 1948241 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,903.11 250489 1948239 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,726.14 250490 1948240 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 178.24 250491 1948235 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,082.11 250492 1948238 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 872.21 250493 1948245 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,337.50 250494 1948244 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,745.62 250495 1948247 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4.67- 250496 477637 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16.40- 250497 477927 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.88- 250498 477926 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.48- 250499 477710 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 50.77- 250500 476258 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.75- 250501 477387 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.70- 250502 477204 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4.68- 250503 477202 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.34- 250504 477203 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 116.86- 250505 477711 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 250506 477301 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.66- 250507 477299 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15.52- 250508 477201 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.48- 250509 477300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.67- 250510 477302 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 71.62- 250511 476998 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.98- 250512 477200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.30- 250513 477386 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 153.12- 250514 476549 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 121.12- 250515 477198 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 59.40- 250516 477298 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 124.80 250682 1948547 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 478.50 250683 1948546 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 44,632.10 341733 11/2512010 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 51.35 ART WORK SOLD 250571 111610 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 51.35 R55CKREG _.iG20000 CITY iNA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341734 1112612010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 115.88 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 250635 111710 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1'.. 10 9:05:31 Page - 39 Business Unit MEDIA STUDIO 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES i 115.88 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 341736 11126/2010 SENIOR CITIZENS 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD W. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUIL CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 250591 111910 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160.00 10041.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 341736 11/25/2010 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN h 600.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250592 111910 600.00 341737 11/26/2010 106887 - KOESSLER,JOE 168.00 OCT'SERVICE 250390 100110 168.00 341738 11/26/2010 113682 KORSTAR INC. 187.03 WALL CAP COUNTER 250010 21159 187.03 341739 11/25/2010 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN 324.00 INSTRUCTOR 250593 111910 324.00 341740 11/26/2010 101936 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 317.60. BUMPERS /TRIGGERS 250011 429881 317.60 ' 341741 11/2512010 100848 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC 10,462.50 SEPT /OCT SERVICES 250636 110810 10,462.50 341742 11/26/2010 113676 LAMETTI & SONS INC. 208,674.82 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 250686 112410 208,674.82 - 341743 11/26/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. - 786.04 PLOW BOLTS, CLAMPS 00005321 250391 9795562 10.83 TERMINALS 00005287 250392 9795561 796.87 - 1'.. 10 9:05:31 Page - 39 Business Unit MEDIA STUDIO 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES i MEDIA STUDIO 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 421552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUIL CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 10041.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN h R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 40 11/19/2010 —11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341744 11/26/2010 101466 LIEBER, JUDY 462.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250594 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 462.00 341746 11/25/2010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 130.00 250517 11174 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 130.00 341746 11126/2010 100868 LOGIS 1,147.00 250393 32889 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,565.50 250393 32889 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,893.00 250393 32889 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,983.00 250393 32889 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,023.00 250393 32889 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,086.00 250393 32889 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,883.50 250393 32889 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 25, 581.00 341747 1112612010 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 585.45 DISINFECTANT CLEANERS 00003846 250394 2558 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 585.45 341748 11/25/2010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 31.16 MIRROR BRACKET 00005354 250012 2110089 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 270.55 PRESSURE SWITCH 00005356 250395 2110139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 301.71 341749 11126/2010 127682 MASSAGE ENVY 1,179.72 INVESTIGATION FEE REFUND 250637 112210 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,179.72 341760 11126/2010 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1,961.10 MEMBERSHIP CARDS 250638 11163 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,961.10 341761 11/2612010 124708 MCLEOD, DOUGLAS 70.00 EMT CERTIFICATION FEE 250639 111810 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 341762 11/26/2010 124142 MCNAUGHTON, MARY 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 250595 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240.00 CITY (,. .,NA 11,. 10 9:05:31 R56CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 41 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341753 1112512010 103944 MED COMPASS 4,706.00 ANNUAL MEDICAL EXAMS 250396 16685 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 112.00 HEARING TESTS 250640 16743 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4,818.00 341754 11/2512010 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,732.00 PLAINVIEW TRIP 250397 111610 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,732.00 341765 11/26/2010 102281 MENARDS 71.56 LUMBER 00001015 250398 19628 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 71.56 341756 11/2612010 104660 MICRO CENTER 26.71 EXTERNAL FLOPPY DRIVE 00004384 250399 3001962 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 26.71 341767 11/25/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 498.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 250641 111510 03449.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-449 PAMELA PARK 1,594.10 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 250641 111510 05492.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -492 PAMELA PARK 3,632.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 250641 111510 04358.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -358 PAMELA PARK 96,007.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 250641 111510 01360.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 101,732.77 341768 11/25/2010 126297 MILLS- NOVOA, NICOLE 126.00 INSTRUCTION 250596 111910 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 773.93 INSTRUCTION 250596 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 899.93 341769 11126/2010 101642 MILTONA TURF PRODUCTS 230.46 SOD STRIPPER 00006479 250013 207503 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 230.46 341760 11/26/2010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 3,062.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001933 250400 33732 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,327.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001078 250642 33737 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,715.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001079 250643 33738 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 7,105.00 341761 11/26/2010 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 50.00 WEB AD 250401 119013 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/1912010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 50.00 341762 11/2512010 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPAS 249.00 TRAINING 250402 16850 -XACA 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 129.00 TRAINING 250403 16850- CL4FFF 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 129.00 TRAINING 250404 16850- CL4RWBE 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 129.00 TRAINING 250405 16850- CL4RCR 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 129.00 TRAINING 250406 16850- CL4TLWP 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 765.00 341763 11/25/2010 102577 MISTER CAR WASH 172.95 CAR WASHES 00005060 250644 2154 1553.6238 CAR WASH 172.95 341764 11/25/2010 123850 MN FIAM BOOK SALES 483.08 TRAINING BOOKS 00003847 250645 1051 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS 483.08 341765 11125/2010 127579 MONEY MAILER OF MINNEAPOLIS WE 999.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE ADS 250407 5180 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 999.00 341766 1112612010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 630.95 BEARINGS, BUSHINGS 00006359 250014 765847 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,693.71 WINTER SERVICE PARTS 00006361 250015 766095 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5,324.66 341767 1112512010 105314 NAGC 315.00 CONTEST ENTRIES 250016 111510 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 480.00 MEMBERSHIP 250016 111510 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 795.00 341768 1112612010 101911 NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER C 365.00 ANNUAL INSPECTION - STA #2 250408 0025086 -IN 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 315.00 ANNUAL INSPECTION - STA #1 250409 0025085 -IN 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 680.00 341769 11/2512010 101727 NELSON, BARBARA 146.25 ART WORK SOLD 250572 111510 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 146.25 341770 11126/2010 127687 NELSON, NATHAN 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 42 Business Unit FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG cJG20000 CITY k- TINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 15.29 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 250677 5231 GREEN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND FARMS RD 15.29 341771 11/26/2010 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 2,276.15 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 250646 56894 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD " 58.32- CREDIT 250647 56904 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,217.83 341772 11/26/2010 101369. NIBBE; MICHAEL 234.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 250017 111510 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 234.00 341773 11/26/2010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 94.34 LENSES, CONVERSION KITS 00005225 250410 25536 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS '- 582.04 INBOARD MODULES;`MOUNT KIT 00005363 250411 25755 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 676.38 341774 11/25/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 31.80 WATER COLORS 00009277 250412 39687001 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 194.03 LETRAMAX 00009283 250413 39709300 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD: 225.83 341776 11/25/2010 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 396.00 INSTRUCTION AC 250597 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 396.00 341776 11/25/2010 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 133.90 ART WORK SOLD 250573 111110 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD 133.90 341777 11/25/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 797.83 CHAIN, GLOVES 00001923 250414 616043 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 472.86 CHAIN 00001930 250415 616384 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,270.69 341778 11/2612010 120866 OLSON, VICKI 40.00 NORTHSTAR PAYROLL MTG 250648 111910 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 40.00 341779 11125/2010 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 625.00 SLIDE EXIT PADS 250649 2118 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS 11. .j10 9:05:31 Page - 43 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT FINANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 ART WORK SOLD 250574 111610 CITY OF EDINA ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 480.00 INSTRUCTION 250598 Council Check Register PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 842.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 25.0598 11/19/2010 -11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 625.00 100347 PAUSTIS B SONS 341780 11 @512010 '. .. 101669 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 250323 8283031 -IN 5822.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH`ST SELLING ? 119.40 PEST CONTROL 250650 59895378 - 1551.6180 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 119.40 - 250325 8283028 -IN 5842.5513 341781 11126/2010 266.25 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 250518 8282536 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 250416 37464 5630.6230 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 962.50 HVAC SERVICE-CONTRACT 00006161 250417 37441 5210.6230 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,683.25 341782 11/2512010 341787 11/25/2010 103624 P& L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 85.00 K9 UNIT CLEAN UP 250416 - 207855 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 165.66 CAR CLEAN UP 00005405 250651 209292 1553.6530 250.66 341783 11/2512010 100060 `PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 211,.35 DISPLAY 00006165 250652 256159 5440.6406 211.35 341784 11/25/2010 j:- - 127583 PANDA COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3,250:90 HI -VIS WINDBREAKERS 00003849 250653 E2646 1470.6406 3,250.90 341786 11/2512010 102440 PASS, GRACE Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page- 44 Business Unit 1 CITY HALL GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT. CENTENNIAL LAKES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.30 ART WORK SOLD 250574 111610 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 480.00 INSTRUCTION 250598 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 842.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 25.0598 111910 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 1;388.30 341786 11/2512010 100347 PAUSTIS B SONS 346.50 250323 8283031 -IN 5822.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH`ST SELLING 443.75 250324 8282542 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,639.00 - 250325 8283028 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266.25 250518 8282536 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 784.75 250519 8283032 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.25 250520 8283033 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,513.50 341787 11/25/2010 119219 PC /NAMETAG 42.87 EVIDENCE POUCHES 250419 15355810 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 42.87 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 341788 11125/2010 250328 100949 PDI NINTH HOUSE 5842.5513 250329 4,500.00 CITY MGR SELECTION CONSULTIN 250330 3447987 4,500.00 250331 341789 11/2612010 250521 124709 PETRELLA, ADAM 5862.5515 250522 70.00 NREMT CERTIFICATION FEE 250523 2991317 70.00 250524 341791 11125/2010 250525 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 5842.5513 250526 320.00 5642.5513 250527 2991312 129.90 250528 2991311 5822.5513 6.25 - 2991309 5822.5513 250530 10.67- 5822.5512 250531 2991316 12.00- 250532 2991319 5862.5512 8.02- 3447988 5862.5513 250534 57.12 5862.5513 250535 3447990 1,840.58 1,628.80 229.26 3,322.77 2,035.17 272.36 757.32 1,403.43 293.78 1.12 2,884.14 6.67 - 22.92- 6.25- 15,102.97 341792 11/2612010 100119 PING 106.11 106.11- 205.12 IRONS 205.12 341793 11/25/2010 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING CITY L. AMA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description G 250654 1101110076 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250420 111810 1470.6104 250326 2988435 5842.5513 250327 2988436 5842.5513 250328 3447985 5842.5513 250329 3447986 5842.5513 250330 3447987 5842.5513 250331 3448034 5842.5513 250521 2991318 5862.5515 250522 2991320 5862.5513 250523 2991317 5862.5513 250524 2991314 5842.5512 250525 2991313 5842.5513 250526 2991315 5642.5513 250527 2991312 5842.5513 250528 2991311 5822.5513 250529 2991309 5822.5513 250530 2991310 5822.5512 250531 2991316 5862.5512 250532 2991319 5862.5512 250533 3447988 5862.5513 250534 3447989 5862.5513 250535 3447990 5862.5513 250655 10424397 5440.5511 250656 10459945 5440.5511 250657 10492876 5440.5511 11_ X109:05:31 Page - 45 Business Unit CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 180.00 250684 11274 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 280.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 341794 11/25/2010 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 120.00 STAFF PORTRAITS 250018 110910 2210.6408 120.00 341795 11/26/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 596.36 TIRES 00005296 250019 63411 1553.6583 405.91 TIRES 00005296 250658 53665 1553.6583 1,002.27 341796 11126/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 185.00 PI PERMIT #303 RENEWAL 250020 1112/2010 1550.6235 185.00 341797 11126/2010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 1,600.00 MAILING 250604 111910 5110.6235 1,600.00 341798 1112612010 100971 QUALITY WINE 348.57 250332 383620 -00 5822.5512 519.19 250333 383787 -00 5822.5513 1,937.31 250334 383785 -00 5842.5513 37.20 250335 383715 -CO 5842.5513 1,162.81 250336 383714 -00 5842.5513 2,481.08 250337 383659 -00 5842.5512 48.33- 250338 377182 -00 5822.5513 244.80 250536 384508 -00 5842.5513 2,245.26 250537 383660-00 58615512 2,492.02 250538 383786 -00 5862.5513 346.80 250539 383716 -00 5862.5513 1,526.20 250540 384509 -00 5822.5513 13,292.91 341799 11/26/2010 123898 QWEST 57.43 952 944 -1841 250021 1841 -11/10 1646.6188 150.85 952 285 -2951 250022 2951 -11/10 1470.6188 58.46 952 944 -6522 250023 6522 -11/10 5511.6188 266.74 341800 11/25/2010 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 338.79 MAIL WATER BILLS 250659 4949 5910.6103 338.79 Subledger Account Description PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES POSTAGE POSTAGE 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 46 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY G. .NA 111_ IO 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 47 11/1912010 -11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341801 11/2512010 126321 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS 704.00 PROGRAM SERVICES 250660 7008 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 704.00 341802 11/26/2010 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 135.96 SAFETY SHOES 00001021 250421 7250001275 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 140.21 SAFETY SHOES 00001021 250421 7250001275 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 140.95 SAFETY SHOES 00001021 250421 7250001275 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 150.00 SAFETY SHOES 00001021 250421 7250001275 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 567.12 341803 11/2612010 127289 REINAN, BARBARA 165.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 250599 111910 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 165.00 341804 11125/2010 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS .801.56 OAT WILT TREATMENTS 250024 45233 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 801.56 341805 11/25/2010 101682 S & S WORLDWIDE INC. 137.98 HULA HOOPS 250661 6788320 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 137.98 341806 11/2612010 117807 SAM'S CLUB 88.94 FACILITY SUPPLIES 250662 110710 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 88.94 341807 1112512010 118168 SANSIO 53.44 EMS FAXING 250422 INVO19241 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 761.61 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 250423 INVO19360 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 815.05 341808 1112612010 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 534.94 FILTERS 00001971 250424 115626 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 534.94 341809 11/25/2010 127387 SCHARF, CLARE 455.91 INSTRUCTION AC 250600 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 455.91 341810 11/26/2010 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Council Check Register Page - 48 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 752.00 INSTRUCTION AC 250601 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 752.00 341811 11/25/2010 127049 SCHNEIDER, KATHERINE 320.00 FITNESS TRAINING 250425 111510 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 320.00 341812 11/26/2010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 271.63 REIMBURSE SUPPLIES 250575 111510 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 600.00 INSTRUCTION 250602 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,136.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 250602 111910 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 2,007.63 341813 11/26/2010 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 165.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 250663 111910 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 165.20 341814 11/26/2010 120997 SHIRTYSOMETHING 653.50 UNIFORMS 00003843 250426 19756 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 653.50 341816 11125/2010 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 1,236.00 DISPATCH TRAINING 250427 -8511 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,236.00 341816 11/2612010 105187 SOVELL, KATHLEEN 260.00 ART WORK SOLD 250576 111610 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 260.00 341817 11/25/2010 110977 SOW, ADAMA 262.80 INSTRUCTION AC 250603 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,095.50 CLEANING / MAINTENANCE 250603 111910 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 2,358.30 341818 11/25/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 46.42 COUPLING 00006364 250025 SI82245 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 46.42 341819 11/25/2010 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 2,760.00 HELP WANTED ADS 250664 103110 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,760.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 250339 MVP01966 5822.5514 CITY L, _JINA 50TH ST SELLING 470.00 250340 Z01984 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 250541 Z01982 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 960.00 11/19/2010 -11/25/2010 5822.5514 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 341820 11/2512010 250430 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 1318.6406 798.00 128.25 PLOW SIDE HARNESS 00005359 250428 16195 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,441.38 SNOW PLOW BLADE 00005052 250665 16164 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 250543 616894 3,569.63 60.00- 250666 341821 11126/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 7,033.60 341827 712.14 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005401 250429 582107 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 106.25 712.14 250028 M18057 1120.6103 341822 11125/2010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 341828 11126/2010 101474 TITLEIST 69.71 PUBLISH NOTICE 250026 1286196 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 250667 2077738 69.71 215.77 341823 1112512010 341829 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 11- -.X010 9:05:31 Page - 49 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION 1,214.00 250339 MVP01966 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 470.00 250340 Z01984 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 501.00 250541 Z01982 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 960.00 250542 MVP01994 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 341824 11/25/2010 102063 SWENSON, THOMAS 32.80 REIMBURSE FOR TAPE 250027 111510 5422.6406 32.80 341826 11/26/2010 124834 TELVENT DTN 798.00 WEATHER SERVICE 00001228 250430 3222715 1318.6406 798.00 341826 1112512010. 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 7,093.60 250543 616894 5862.5514 60.00- 250666 00773144 5421.5514 7,033.60 341827 11/26/2010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 106.25 DRAFT MINUTES 11/1/10 MEETING 250028 M18057 1120.6103 106.25 341828 11126/2010 101474 TITLEIST 215.77 BAGS 250667 2077738 5440.5511 215.77 341829 11/26/2010 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 -11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 450.00 FENCE REPAIR 250029 23197 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5120.5510 5422.6406 1375.6103 3201.6103 1550.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1322.6406- 450.00 1646.6556 TOOLS 1301.6556 TOOLS 341830 11/25/2010 REPAIR PARTS 101042 TRIARCO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6203 60.34 WATERCOLOR PADS 00009262 250431 994771 60.34 341831 1112512010 123582 TSCHOSICK, RON 192.44 REIMBURSE FOR DRAIN TILE 250030 111510 192.44 341832 11/25/2010 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 158.61 RAMP DOOR REPAIR 00001047 250432 340790 158.61 341833 1112612010 103048 U.S. BANK 750.00 ADMINISTRATION FEES 250031 2745155 750.00 341834 11/25/2010 103048 U.S. BANK 875.25 ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE FEE 250668 661984E 875.25 341835 11/26/2010 115379 U.S. BANK 51.08 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES/TOOLS 00001044 250433 OCT510 68.34 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES/TOOLS 00001044 250433 OCT510 75.08 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIESITOOLS 00001044 250433 OCT510 209.56 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIESITOOLS 00001044 250433 OCT510 448.60 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES/TOOLS 00001044 250433 OCT510 852.66 341836 11/2612010 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2,001.84 UNIFORMS 250032 103110 3,228.10 UNIFORMS 250032 103110 1,861.96- INV #49941 PREVIOUSLY PAID 250444 CREDIT 3,367.98 341837 11/25/2010 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 275.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 250434 111910 275.00 341838 11/2512010 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 5120.5510 5422.6406 1375.6103 3201.6103 1550.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1322.6406- GENERAL SUPPLIES 1646.6556 TOOLS 1301.6556 TOOLS 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1240.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page- 50 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PARKING RAMP CITY HALL DS REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY G. _:.TINA 11i'�_._�10 9:05:31 unci ec egis er Page - 51 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10.38 SHIP SAMPLES 00001932 250435 TRAN2298 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 10.38: - 341839 11/25/2010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 284.52 METER IDLERS, GAUGES 00001926 250436 272463 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION - 40.51 FLANGES TO CAP WATER LINE 00001924 250437 271567 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 325.03 341840 11/25/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 44.63 _ LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 250033 179589 -01 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING \ 447.08 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512`-250034 179589 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 491.71 341841 11/25/2010 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 600.00 AR &LE CATALOG DESIGN 250669 310 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 600.00 341842 11/25/2010 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 142.08 PVC, FITTINGS, TOOLS 00001027 250438 4992733 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 142.08' 341843 11/2512010 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 106.88 POSTCARDS 250439 37757 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 106.88 341844 11/25/2010 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 222.50 LEAK LOCATE - 00001935 250670 2110 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 222.50 341845 11/26/2010 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 103.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 250671 111110 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 103.00 341846 11/25/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 180.20 250341 256102 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,593.45 250544 256315 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 244.20 250545 256170 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD'WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,601.25 250546 256307 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 608.25 250547 256171 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,227.35 341847 . 11/25/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 569.87 105.12 5,851.59 4.48 3,765.92 10,232.74 341848 11/2512010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,513.00 250342 486565 1,749.21 250343 488278 5,152.49 250344 488279 12,284.34 250345 488282 31.02 250346 488281 16,894.67 250347 488280 613.80- 250348 815374 39.95 250554 488276 11,124.10 250555 488275 3,900.71 250556 488273 1,469.11 250557 489180 615.04- 250558 815994 1,043.25 250685 490147 53,973.01 341849 11/25/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,921.35 250349 681236 65.50 250350 681237 5,025.00 250559 683083 2,707.35 250560 682853 78.90 250561 680443 .03 250562 680441 962.00 250563 680697 3,042.15 250564 680442 14,802.28 341850 11125/2010 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 249.60 RUBBER TEES 00006164 250440 250533 126.17 CLUB BARREL 00006163 250441 250532 375.77 341851 11/25/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 495.00 250351 257274 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 11/19/2010 - 11/25/2010 Doc No Inv No Account No 250548 340792 5862.5513 250549 340790 5822.5513 250550 340793 5842.5513 250551 340791 5842.5513 250552 340794 5862.5513 250553 50851 5862.5513 341848 11/2512010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,513.00 250342 486565 1,749.21 250343 488278 5,152.49 250344 488279 12,284.34 250345 488282 31.02 250346 488281 16,894.67 250347 488280 613.80- 250348 815374 39.95 250554 488276 11,124.10 250555 488275 3,900.71 250556 488273 1,469.11 250557 489180 615.04- 250558 815994 1,043.25 250685 490147 53,973.01 341849 11/25/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,921.35 250349 681236 65.50 250350 681237 5,025.00 250559 683083 2,707.35 250560 682853 78.90 250561 680443 .03 250562 680441 962.00 250563 680697 3,042.15 250564 680442 14,802.28 341850 11125/2010 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 249.60 RUBBER TEES 00006164 250440 250533 126.17 CLUB BARREL 00006163 250441 250532 375.77 341851 11/25/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 495.00 250351 257274 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5210.6590 5210.6590 5842.5513 RANGE BALLS RANGE BALLS 11/23/2010 9:05:31 Page - 52 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG �OG20000 CITY . -JINA Council Check Register 11/19/2010 — 11/25/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,655.83 250565 257217 5862.5513 280.00- 250566 257215 5862.5513 1,870.83 341862 1112512010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 285.95 51- 4197645 -8 250035 260146229 3,019.98 51- 6227619 -3 250036 260533565 39.71 51- 5276505 -8 250442 260694277 3,345.64 341863 1112512010 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 14,234.43 UNLEADED GAS 00001010 250443 409833 14,234.43 341854 11125/2010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 82.50 250567 9916 82.50 341855 11/2512010 124960 ZAHL - PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE C 374.82 FUEL PUMP REPAIRS 00005402 250672 0166001 -IN 374.82 341856 11125/2010 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 44.20 EYEDROPS 250673 54166633 44.20 795,124.30 Grand Total 1322.6185 5630.6185 1330.6185 1553.6581 5862.5513 1553.6406 1551.6406 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER GASOLINE 1. _010 9:05:31 Page - 53 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC SIGNALS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 795,124.30 Total Payments 795,124.30 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 11/19/2010- 11/25/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 165,477.89 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,003.34 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 750.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 99,397.12 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,628.41 05100 ART CENTER FUND 20,715.46 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,562.27 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 842.69 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 10,125.51 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 170.46 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 19,887.58 05800 LIQUOR FUND 228,122.28 05900 UTILITY FUND 234,577.47 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,774.88 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,088.94 Report Totals 795,124.30 We conflrm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll ies and Procedures-data 1115,0 ) 11/23/2010 9:06:46 Page - 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 1 12/212010 - 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341857 12/2/2010 116531 ABLE SPRINKLER 517.18 SPRINKLER REPAIR 250707 7619 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 517.18 341858 12/212010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 15.00 250840 0808120 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 32.00 250841 0724832 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 65.40 250842 0724854 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 44.60 250843 0808127 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 40.80 250844 0724857 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 197.80 341859 _ 12/212010 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 237.60 COFFEE 250934 662547 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 237.60 341860 1212/2010 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 651.66 PLOW PARTS 00006365 250935 10075968 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 651.66 341861 12/2/2010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 85.27 VEHICLE REPAIRS 250990 3403 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.27 341862 12/2/2010 100642 BANNERS TO GO 43.11 SIGNS 00001029 250708 31106 1325.6532 PAINT STREET NAME SIGNS 37.41 PARK SIGN 00001972 250991 31065 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 80.52 341863 121212010 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 2,580.50 WATER RESOURCES MGMT 250709 23271072.00 -11 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,936.25 LS #2 IMPROVEMENTS 250710 23271114.00-4 10041.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 796.41 LS #2 IMPROVEMENTS 250711 23271114.00 -5 10041.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 5,313.16 341864 12/2/2010 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 21.36 BATTERY 00005335 250936 018 - 219470 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.36 BATTERY 00005335 250937 018 - 219568 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.72 341865 12/2/2010 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 226.20 250845 55875100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 341866 12/212010 Amount Supplier / Explanation 427.75 1,580.15 103.57 362.85 92.06 74.68 2,867.26 126139 BERNICK'S WINE PO # Doc No 250846 250847 250848 250849 250850 250851 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 - 12/2/2010 Inv No Account No 54905100 5862.5513 54905000 5862.5513 84487900 5822.5515 84487800 5842.5515 6008900 5862.5515 84450700 5862.5515 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- 2 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 46.92 250852 13032 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 46.92 341867 12/2/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 162.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250784 OE- 241122 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 776.96 SECURITY SAFE 250785 OE- 241548 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 48.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250938 OE- 240776 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 5.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250939 OE- 240782 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 207.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250940 WO- 658278 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 138.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 250992 OE- 241578 -1 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,340.15 341868 121212010 101440 BOLKS, JEFFREY 33.36 GAS FOR CITY VEHICLE 250941 112210 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.36 341869 12/2/2010 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 18,118.75 OCT 2010 PROSECUTING 250993 111010 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 18,118.75 341870 12/2/2010 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 390.00 250853 101515 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 390.00 341871 121212010 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 10.56 SWITCH 00005323 250712 462384 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.84 BLUESTRIPE 00005325 250713 462860 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.11 BRACE 00005362 250714 462808 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.37 BRACE 00005323 250715 462889 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.73 SUPPORT 00005360 250716 462897X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 129.84 TRUCK RENTAL 250942 46450 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.12 HANDLE ASSEMBLY, RIVETS 00005369 250943 464606 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.74 RETAINER 00005368 250944 464769 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPEP 'GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 3 12/2/2010 — 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 453.31 341872 12/212010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,035.25 MATERIALS TESTING 250717 325779 01360.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD 2,840.00 SOIL BORINGS /LAB TESTING 250718 327572 01334.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,990.00 SOIL BORINGS /LAB TESTING 250719 327570 01384.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 553.50 MATERIALS TESTING 250720 327566 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 7,418.75 341873 12/2/2010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 1,104.03 DOOR REPAIRS 250945 514548S 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 1,104.03 341874 1212/2010 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 1,613.48 DEC NEWSLETTER 00008251 250946 23412 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,613.48 341876 12/2/2010 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 31.40 250854 13611 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 798.90 250855 13609 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,868.95 250856 13612 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,699.25 341876 12/2/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 250.00 251033 88467 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 250.00 341877 12/212010 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 164.41 8034001 -1 250786 8034001 -11110 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,203.43 5591458-4 250947 5591458 -11/10 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 1,298.72 5546504 -1 250948 5546504 -11/10 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 63.47 5596524 -8 250949 5596524 -11/10 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 808.28 5584304 -9 250950 5584304 -11/10 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 14.48 5584310 -6 250951 5584310 -11/10 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 18.31 5590919 -6 250952 5590919 -11/10 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 5,571.10 341878 1212/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 187.15 250857 432523 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 187.15 341879 12/212010 101803 CITY OF BURNSVILLE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 — 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 220.00 POWER TECH CLASS - J. LUGER 250994 112210 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 220.00 POWER TECH CLASS - R. ATOL 250994 112210 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 440.00 - 341880 12/212010 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 364.41 00105263- 0335037016 250787 335037016 -11/10 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER 611.23 00113607 - 0342163045 250788 342163045 -11110 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER 186.20 00077443- 0332300004 250995 332300004 -11/10 1646.6189 - SEWER & WATER 1,161.84 341881 12/2/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 526.60 250858 0118155214 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 526.60 341882 12/2/2010 106433 COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS INC 477.75 REPAIR XCEL LINE 250721 BC47840 -1 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 477.75 341883 121212010 127588 COMMERCIAL CLAIMS INC. 179.00 NO SHOW 250722 10-10 -00685 5910.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 179.00 341884 12/2/2010 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 27.02 CONCRETE PLANT INSPECTION 250723 PA000193111 01379.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 27.02 341886 12/2/2010 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 2,260.00 WORKERS COMP 250789 1506947 1400.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,260.00 341886 12/2/2010 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 9,424.99 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 00008098 250790 72658 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 2,958.33 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 00008098 250791 72661 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 12,383.32 341887 1212/2010 100703 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS 254.81 OUTLET COVERS 00005409 250953 13597 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 254.81 341888 12/2/2010 127689 D NELSON IRRIGATION 170.70 SPRINKLER REPAIR 250724 741 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 170.70 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- 4 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD GENERAL (BILLING) BA -379 44TH ST BRKSIDE &THIELEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1212/2010 - 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 341889 12/2/2010 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 4,660.00 SCADA CONVERSION 00001080 250725 9949 05508.1705 5,212.40 SCADA CONVERSION 00001081 250726 9953 05508.1705 9,872.40 341890 1212/2010 104020 DALCO 118.37 FLOOR SCRUBBER:PARTS 00008060 250792 2270602 5511.6511 118.37 341891 121212010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,261.55 250859 578205 5862.5514 51.50 250860 578206 5862.5515 1,072.45 250861 578207 5842.5514 44.80 250862 578208 5842.5515 2,430.30 341892 12/2/2010 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 6,340.24 SURCHARGE -OCT 2010 250996 10307053060 1495.4380 6,340.24 341893 12/2/2010. 102831, . DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 139.40 650487671 00008068 250793 650487671 -11/10 5511.6188 96.80 650243624 250997 650243624 -11/10 5631.6122 236.20 341894 12/2/2010 100094 DMX INC. 712.11 ANNUAL MUSIC CONTRACT 250794 50041496 5841.6406 712.11 ANNUAL MUSIC CONTRACT 250795 50041494 5821.6406 712.11 ANNUAL MUSIC CONTRACT 250796, 50041495 5861.6406 2,136.33 341896 12/2/2010 102262. DRAPER; TOM 52.78 UNIFORM PURCHASE 250954 - 111110 1400.6203 52.78 341896 12/2/2010 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 NOV MEETING 250998 29177 1120.6106 25.00 NOV MEETING 250998 29177 2210.6106 50.00 341897 121212010 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC Subledger Account Description CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX SURCHARGE 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- 5 Business Unit WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES, 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 121212010 - 1212/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,390.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 250955 61305 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,390.00 341898 1212/2010 124269 ENERGIZE ELECTRIC SERVICE LLC 380.56 WIRING 00001054 250956 1124 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 380.56 341899 1212/2010 127690 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 481.03 FUSES, CONNECTORS, BULBS 00005219 250727 165522 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 446.52 BULBS, LIGHTS, KITS 00005219 250728 165523 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 927.55 341900 12/2/2010 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 600.00 ACQUISITION AGENT 250729 00 -10074 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 150.00 ACQUISITION AGENT 250730 00 -10090 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 150.00 ACQUISITION AGENT 250731. 00 -10034 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 900.00 341901 12/2/2010 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 250863 W- 279968 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 315.00 341902 12/2/2010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 159.73 TENSIONERS, BELTS 00005297 250732 69- 023850 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8.93 WASHER FLUID 00005297 250733 69- 025291 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 35.59 PULLEY 00005297 250957 70- 033568 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 204.25 341903 12/2/2010 105420 FIKES SERVICES 41.25 AIR DEODORIZERS 250958 8019 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 41.25 341904 12/2/2010 102727 FORCE AMERICA 444.45 ORBITAL SIDE SUCTION 00005407 250734 01352459 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 444.45 341905 12/2/2010 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 21.38 INSPECTION FORMS 00001049 250735 01E1745410 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.38 341906 12/2/2010 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 200.00 PARKING LOT STRIPING 00001985 250999 10119 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- 6 Business Unit PIR DS REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH -SUNNYSIDE S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH- SUNNYSIDE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PATHS & HARD SU' "c R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 7 1212/2010 - 1212/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 200.00 341907 12/212010 106636 GOTTESMAN, CAROL 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE TRAINING 251000 112410 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 341908 12/2/2010 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 25.53 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 00005061 250959 72496 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.53 341909 12/212010 101103 GRAINGER 243.98 TARP STRAPS, GLOVES 00005397 250736 9395808281 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 211.99 WRENCHES, BATTERIES 00001931 250737 9395946503 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 6.47 CAPACITOR 250797 9393912077 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 245.26 LAMPS, EAR PLUGS 250960 9399991885 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 220.29 LIGHTING, BALLASTS 00006477 250961 9385684346 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 10.32 STRETCH WRAP 00006480 250962 9390693555 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 13.77 BALLAST 00006480 250963 9390855840 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 74.76 MOUSE TRAPS 00005327 250964 9397704355 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.29 GLOVES 00005327 250965 9397339087 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.14 BOOT DRYERS 00005406 250966 9399061903 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,204.27 341910 12/212010 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING - DEC 250798 22453 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 341911 12/2/2010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2,465.61 CRUUSE HINDS 250738 950431535 1552.6103 " PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,465.61 341912 12/2/2010 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 147.20 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 250739 102955 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 545.18 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 250740 102956 01359.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 692.38 341913 12/2/2010 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 1,394.26 GENERATOR 00001984 251001 13027 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,394.26 341914 12/2/2010 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 955.00 PATCH HEAT CABLES 250741 10 -10-5 05489.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-489 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 3,107.25 CITY OF EDINA 341919 12/212010 Council Check Register 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 12/2/2010 — 1212/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 250865 541648 955.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 220.00 341915 12/2/2010 5822.5514 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 1,177.00 44.11 ADAPTER, FUSE 00001033 250967 71183 -1 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 44.11 115.20 PW / ENG SUPPLIES 341916 12/2/2010 1260.6577 125270 HARTFORD 185.83 PW / ENG SUPPLIES 00001053 250968 111210 5,000.94 PREMIUM 251002 5124070 -3 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE -99 00001053 250968 111210 5,000.94 GENERAL SUPPLIES 534.97 341917 12/2/2010 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 341921 12/2/2010 119867 IC MA 21,240.02 PREMIUM 251061 36199056 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 250799 140857 666.76 PREMIUM 251062 36199565 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 10,663.19 PREMIUM 251062 36199565 9900.2033.04 DENTAL -99 22,821.52 PREMIUM 251062 36199565 9900.2033.25 HIGH DED. HEALTH INS. 250742 87313 23,608.02 PREMIUM 251062 36199565 9900.2033.01 MEDICA HIGH OPTION 51,506.82 PREMIUM 251062 36199565 9900.2033.02 MEDICA ELECT 69,173.40 PREMIUM 251062 36199565 9900.2033.03 MEDICA LOW 199,679.73 341918 12/2/2010 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page - 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING 3,107.25 OCT 2010 ROOM & BOARD 251003 201010 - EDINA 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION ADMINISTRATION A -241 WEST 70TH I 'CAPING 3,107.25 341919 12/212010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 112.50 250864 541704 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 844.50 250865 541648 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 220.00 251034 541697 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,177.00 341920 12/212010 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 115.20 PW / ENG SUPPLIES 00001053 250968 111210 1260.6577 LUMBER 185.83 PW / ENG SUPPLIES 00001053 250968 111210 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 233.94 PW / ENG SUPPLIES 00001053 250968 111210 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 534.97 341921 12/2/2010 119867 IC MA 888.51 DUES - CECELIA SMITH 250799 140857 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 888.51. 341922 12/2/2010 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 393.70 LANDSCAPE PLAN PRINTING 250742 87313 01241.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET RENOVATION ADMINISTRATION A -241 WEST 70TH I 'CAPING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/212010 - 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 393.70 - 341923 12/2/2010 119808 INTEG RA - TELECOM 295.36 PHONES / INTERNET 250969 7606461 7411.6188 4402.6710 1419.6102 1260.6406 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- 9 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES RESERVE PROGRAM lJ ENGINEERING GENERAL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 295.36 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 341924 12/2/2010 5862.5514 124628 J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - YORK SELLING 5842.5515 6,467.13 PW CONSTRUCTION MGMT 250800 8115 -15 VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 6,467.13 VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 341925 1212/2010 VERNON SELLING 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 251004 120110 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 100.00 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 341926 121212010 50TH ST SELLING 100830 JERRY S PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 123.98 WATER SHUT OFF NOTICES 00001855 250743 51419' 123.98 341927 12/2/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 18.00 251035 1443593 32.55 251036 1443590 1,406.45 251037 1443591 1,279.40 251038 1443592 5,427.77 251039 1443597 39.05 251040 1443598 8,203.22 341928 12/2/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,219.96 450866 1950023 207.24 250867 1950021 4,265.13 250868 -1950025 1,864.70 250869 1950022 1.080.52 250870 1951609 1,950.09 250871 1950024 406.74 250872 1950017 449.72 250873 1950016 807.36 250874 1950015 192.22 250875 1950014 248.88 250876 1950013 207.24 250877 1950012 12.85- 250878 477925 8.75- 250879 478054 4402.6710 1419.6102 1260.6406 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- 9 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES RESERVE PROGRAM lJ ENGINEERING GENERAL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF. GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD:WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS-SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD,LI000R 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 5,565.32 1.12 1,353.95 62.74 PO # Doc No 251041 251042 251043 251044 251045 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 - 1212/2010 Inv No Account No 1951605 5842.5513 1951601 5842.5513 1951606 5842:5512 1951607 5842.5515 1951604 5842.5512 341929 12/212010 12/1/2010 7:55:44 127056 KG,LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT Page- .10 Subledger Account Description' Business-Unit 1,017.68 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 250744 0015847 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,017.68 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 341930 12/2/2010 J 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 967.20 50TH & FRANCE LANDSCAPING 250745 4283213 257.40 50TH 88 FRANCE LANDSCAPING 250746 4283212 1,224.60 341931 12/2/2010 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 63.30 MERCHANDISE 250747 2533525 172.02 MERCHANDISE 250748 2536719 67.43 GOLF BALLS 250749 2539333 302.75 341932 12/2/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 45.16 PIPE FITTINGS 00005396 250750 9800121 382.86 DRILL BITS, WASHERS, NUTS 00005305 250970 9803388 428.02 341933 12/2/2010 116576 LIFE LINE INC. 1,274.00 TRAINING CLASSES 00001048 250751 LL -3496 1,274.00 341934 12/2%2010 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 116.58 SERVICE CONTRACT 00005408 250752 1184922 116.58 341936 121212010 122472 M & I BANK 10.67 TRAINING FACILITY EXPENSES 250971 111510 12.82 TRAINING FACILITY EXPENSES 250971 111510 18.15 TRAINING FACILITY EXPENSES 250971 111510 30.00 TRAINING FACILITY EXPENSES 250971 111510 48.25 TRAINING FACILITY EXPENSES 250971 111510 638.19 TRAINING FACILITY EXPENSES 250971 111510 01362.1705.20 01237.1705:20 01237.1705.20 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1553.6530 1553.6530 1280.6104 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS' . REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7412.6406 7410.6106 7411.6406 7410.6105 7414.6406 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES &'SUBSCRIP.TIONS GENERAL'SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO'SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO'SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD =-EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF RANGE PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION' PUBLIC PROGRAMS PSTF OCCUPANCY 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page- .10 Subledger Account Description' Business-Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING `- COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING J i CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONSULTING DESIGN A= 237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION CONSULTING DESIGN A- 237 50TH &FRANCE RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS' . REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7412.6406 7410.6106 7411.6406 7410.6105 7414.6406 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES &'SUBSCRIP.TIONS GENERAL'SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO'SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO'SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD =-EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF RANGE PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION' PUBLIC PROGRAMS PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA .12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 11 12/2/2010 - 121212010 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 758.08 341936 1212/2010 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,182.80 250880 98499 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,182.80 341937 1212/2010 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 2,450.00 WELL PUMP REMOVAL 250972 23515 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,450.00 341938 1212/2010 126941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 539.29 BOILER REPAIR 250801 2538573 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 539.29 341939 12/2/2010 101987 MENARDS 240.96 HOLIDAY LIGHTS 00002018 250802 38524 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 66.43 SHOVELS, BATTERIES 00002018 250803 38486 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 52.06 BULBS, NOZZLE 00002018 250804 38778 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 95.82 DECORATIONS, BROOM, ALARM 00002021 250805 40518 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 42.62 MOP BUCKET 00001894 250806 40814 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 62.49 WET /DRY VAC, FILTER 00002382 251005 21390 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 560.38 341940 121212010 102281 MENARDS 110.74 LUMBER 00001887 250807 20863 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.27 DRIVEWAY MARKERS 00001034 250808 23622 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 136.01 341941 12/2/2010 100885 METRO SALES INC 398.24 COPIER USAGE 250753 381406 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 398.24 341942 12/212010 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 82.50 OFFICIATING FEES 250754 3827 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 82.50 341943 12/2/2010 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 39,738.60 OCT 2010 SAC CHARGES 250755 111910 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 39,738.60 341944 12/212010 127263 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2,153.36 WORKBENCH 00001202 250756 714353 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 335.00 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 341946 12/212010 Council Check Register 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES Page- 12 12/2!2010 — 12/2/2010 98.00 HAND SOAP 00001974 251006 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 453.15 TIRE RACKS 00001207 250757 714730 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 1,274.80 LADDERS, CARTS, WORK BENCH 00001217 250758 714866 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 3,530.41 LADDERS, CARTS, WORK BENCH 00001217 250758 714866 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 7,411.72 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 251008 921078205 5841.6180 341945 1212/2010 127601 MILLE LACS COUNTY 16.03 WINDOW CLEANING 251009 921078206 335.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 251063 112910 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT STREET EQUIPMENT STREET EQUIPMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 335.00 341946 12/212010 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 98.00 HAND SOAP 00001974 251006 178808 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 98.00 341947 12/212010 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING 251007 921078207 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 251008 921078205 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16.03 WINDOW CLEANING 251009 921078206 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 42.75 341948 12/212010 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 57.40 WHEELS FOR TRACTORS 00001976 251010 7431 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.40 341949 12/2/2010 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,070.00 CONNECTION FEE 250809 111710 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 22,070.00 341950 12/212010 106430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY 10,691.56 SHELVING 00001248 250759 M42537 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2.110.93 SHELVING 00001218 250760 M58967 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 12,802.49 341951 12/2/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 7,016.34 WORK BENCHES 00005048 250973 0086784 -IN 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3.87 PLASTIC PARTS 00005399 250974 0086781 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 7,020.21 341952 12/2/2010 100169 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 63.29 ENVELOPES 250977 5690 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.29 341963 12/21 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT STREET EQUIPMENT STREET EQUIPMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page- 13 12/212010 - 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 188.44 V -RINGS 00006362 250975 766533 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 186.82 BUSHINGS, SPRINGS 00006365 250976 767074 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 14.93 FILTER 00002395 251064 762228 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 390.19 341954 12/2/2010 127591 NATIONAL IMPRINT CORPORATION 546.25 POLICE BOOKLETS 250978 118314 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 546.25 341955 12/2/2010 104431 NENA 85.00 DUES - LAURENE DRAPER 250979 265847 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.00 341956 12/2/2010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 746.50 250881 62977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 746.50 341957 12/212010 127594 NOONAN, ELIZABETH 208.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251011 112210 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 208.00 341958 121212010 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 165.33 STEEL, ALUMINUM 00005063 251012 190469 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 165.33 341959 1212/2010 108612 NORTHERN GREEN EXPO 158.00 CONFERENCE (2) 251013 112210 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 158.00 341960 12/2/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 58.50 D'ARCHES W/C 00009273 250810 39655201 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 58.50 341961 12/2/2010 116114 OCE 10.00 OCE MAINTENANCE 250761 987287824 1260.6548 BLUE PRINTING ENGINEERING GENERAL 10.00 341962 12/2/2010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 13.13 THERMAL PAPER 00006034 250980 1279182232 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 13.13 341963 12/2/2010 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 14 12/212010 - 12/2/2010 " Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 365.06 250811 W10100616 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 22.80 250812 W10100610 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22.80 250812 W10100610 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.60 250812 W10100610 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.60 250812 W10100610 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 68.40 250812 W10100610 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 91.20 250812 W10100610 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 91.20 250812 W10100610 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 114.00 250812 W10100610 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 125.28 250812 W10100610 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 136.80 250812 W10100610 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 155.27 250812 W10100610 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 204.15 250812 W10100610 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 204.16 250812 W10100610 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 319.20 250812 W10100610 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 2,011.52 341964 12/212010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 55.27 TAPE 00001030 251014 616978 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.51 CHAIN FOR BLOWERS 00001975 251015 617740 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 105.78 341965 1212/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 798.25 250882 8283627 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 368.50 250883 8283626 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,272.15 250884 8283625 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,438.90 341966 12/2/2010 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 7,250.00 EXCAVATING AT PW BLDG 250762 91 4402.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PW BUILDING 7,250.00 341967 12/2/2010 119372 PETSMART #463 98.67 K9 DOG FOOD 00003160 251016 T -7851 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 98.67 341968 1212/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 4,358.12 250885 2992485 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 171.14 250886 2992482 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 826.07 250887 2992483 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.00- 250888 3448652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.00- 250889 3448651 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 41.07 9.00- 5,363.40 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 - 1212/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 251046 2993701 5842.5515 251047 3448650 5842.5512 341969 1212/2010 50TH ST SELLING 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 60.00 PHOTO SHOOT VERNON SELLING 250763 111610 2210.6408 YORK SELLING 60.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 341970 12/2/2010 YORK SELLING 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 135.00 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 00005296 251017 82378 1553.6583 536.00 TIRES 00005296 251018 85248 1553.6583 680.82 TIRES 00005296 251019 85521 1553.6583 1,351.82 341971 12/2/2010 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 10,447.02 SECURITY SYSTEM FOR PW 00001197 250764 56116 4402.1705.30 10,447.02 . 341972 1212/2010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 17.50 CAN LINERS 00008064 250813 5018 5511.6511 17.50 341973 12/2/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 432.44 250890 386404 -00 5822.5513 2,659.14 250891 385534 -00 5862.5512 1,223.66 250892 385515 -00 5862.5513 1,301.56 250893 385514-00 5862.5513 897.61 250894 386403-00 5862.5513 64.00 250895 386770 -00 5842.5513 1,346.07 250896 385992 -00 5842.5513 446.40 250897 386401 -00 5842.5513 116.60 250898 386402 -CO 5842.5514 144.60 250899 386292 -00 5842.5512 4,010.13 250900 386222 -00 5842.5512 954.62 250901 385516 -00 5822.5513 932.31 250902 385517 -00 5822.5512 14,529.14 341974 1212/2010 123898 QWEST 113.71 952 920 -8166 251058 8166 -11/10 1550.6188 57.14 952 922 -2444 251059 244411/10 1550.6188 170.85 1211/2010 7:55:44 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLEANING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 16 1212/2010 — 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 341975 12/212010 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 510.00 REPAIRS TO LIGHTING 00002023 251020 95357 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 510.00 341976 12/2/2010 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 144.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00001055 250981 725000001290 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 148.71 SAFETY BOOTS 00001055 250981 725000001290 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 00001055 250981 725000001290 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 443.66 341977 12/212010 108672 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN 155.00 EROSION CLASS 00001013 250765 0230003598 1260.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL -155.00 341978 12/212010 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 291.95 REMOVE DRINKING FOUNTAIN 00008067 250814 156149 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 136.00 WATER HEATER REPAIR 00008063 250815 56200 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 427.95 341979 1212/2010 121106 ROCHON CORPORATION 26,104.06 PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS 250982 112310 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 26,104.06 341980 1212/2010 127696 SANDVIK, LOIS 85.66 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 251021 5019 WOODDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 85.66 341981 121212010 104161 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 700.38 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 251023 8102759275 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 700.38 341982 1212/2010 127692 SCHMID, CONNOR & KATHRYN 15,120.00 ROW ACQUISITION FOR SIDEWALK 251024 111810 07101.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE 15,120.00 341983 12/2/2010 127593 SCHOENWETTER, WILLIAM & BARBAR 134.03 DRIVEWAY UPGRADE W /PROJECT 251025 111810 01374.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -374 INTERLACHEN BLUFF 134.03 341984 1212/2010 100996 SEH 7,890.02 STORM /SIGN INVENTORY 250766, 236116 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM Z R55CKREG LOG20000 Check# Date Amount 663.33 1,105.55 7,517.74 12,824.37 515.92 1,134.05 4,205.26 9,461.83 20,544.07 147.64 196.85 442.92 688.99 1;107.31 1,107.31 1,230.34 7,257.26 185.57 1,402.65 79,628.98 Supplier / Explanation PO # RIDGE ROAD RECON RIDGE ROAD RECON RIDGE ROAD RECON RIDGE ROAD RECON PAMELA PK IMPROV PAMELA PK IMPROV PAMELA PK IMPROV ' PAMELAPKIMPROV MINNEHAHA WOODS COUNTRY CLUB RECON COUNTRY CLUB RECON COUNTRY CLUB RECON ' COUNTRY CLUB RECON COUNTRY CLUB RECON COUNTRY CLUB RECON COUNTRY CLUB RECON SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION ENGINEERING SERVICES CLEARWIRE ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 121212010 - 12/212010 Doc No Inv No 250767 236664 250767 236664 250767 236664 250767 236664 250768 236661 250768 236661 ;- 250768 236661 250768 236661 250769 236665 250770 236660 250770 236660 250770 236660 250770 236660 250770 236660 250770 236660 250770 236660 250771 237274 250772 237273 251022 237707 Account No 03461.1705.20 05510.1705.20 01384.1705.20 04374.1705.20 03449.1705.24 05492.1705.24 04358.1705.24 01360.1705.24 01334.1705.20 08043.1705.24 08049.1705.24 04297.1705.24 03413.1705.24 01214.1705.24 01213.1705.24 05436.1705.24. 5923.6136 04297.1705.24 1001.4722 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING'CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT RENTAL OF PROPERTY 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page - 17 Business Unit SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECON, STRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD SS-449 PAMELA PARK WM492 PAMELA PARK STS -358 PAMELA PARK BA -360 PAMELA PARK N -HOOD BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON. L -43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN PHASE 1 ARDEN; BRUCE, CASCO PHASE 1 ARDEN,--BRUCE, CASCO WM COLLECTION SYSTEMS' PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST GENERAL FUND REVENUES 341986 12/2/2010 104672. SPRINT 8.70 251026 111810 1240.6188 TELEPHONE. PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 33.06 251026 111810 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF.000UPANCY 51.17 251026 111810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 51.38 251026 111810 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 51.81 251026 111810. 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 52.04 251026 111810 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 56.51 251026 111810 1140.6188 TELEPHONE. PLANNING 80.91. 251026 111810 -'` 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCEMAINTENANCE 80.98 251026 111810 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 93.09 251026 111810 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 113.17 251026 111810 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 131.66 251026 111810• 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 207.93 251026 111810 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 244.39 251026 111810 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL" MAINTENANCE. 288.03. 251026 111810 1470.6188 _ TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 310.59 251026 111810 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 341.80 251026 111810 5620.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH PARK 357.86 251026 111810 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 444.41 251026 111810 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 — 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 482.56 251026 111810 5910.6188 TELEPHONE 1,624.01 251026 111810 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 341986 1212/2010 REPAIR PARTS 101004 SPS COMPANIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 15.65 BREAKER 00001046 250773 S2290947.001 1551.6406 16.92 LAMP 00001893 251027 52290053.001 1646.6578 32.57 341987 12/212010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 265.05 SINGLE TINE 00005058 250774 SM10345 1553.6530 226.58 WIPER MOTOR 00005324 250775 S182363 1553.6530 142.39 CROSS & BEARING 00005365 250776 S182473 1553.6530 634.02 341988 12/2/2010 100660 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 315.40 FIRE PANEL REPAIR 00001229 250777 7753334 1552.6530 315.40 341989 121212010 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 2,586.38 TAILGATE SANDER 00001890 251028 16328 421650.6710 2,586.38 341990 12/212010 102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 8,753.06 ROLLERS 00006478 250983 3245 -RGR 5400.1740 8,753.06 341991 12/2/2010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,537.00 251048 MVP02032 5842.5514 1,642.00 251049 MVP02022 5862.5514 3,179.00 341992 1212/2010 120595 T- MOBILE 84.88 SURVEY PHONE 477067848 250778 102710 1260.6188 84.88 341993 12/2/2010 102300 TCALMC 300.00 DUES - CECELIA SMITH 250816 110410 1120.6105 300.00 341994 12/2/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 211.00 250903 616893 5862.5514 GENERAL SUPPLIES LAMPS & FIXTURES 12/112010 7:55:44 Page - 18 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 — 12/2/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,696.00 251050 617617 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 176.25 251051 617618 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,083.25 341995 121212010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 73.87 GLOVES 00001045 250985 329956 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.87 341996 12/2/2010 123649 TOWMASTER 213.43 SPILL PLATES 00005059 250779 325508 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 213.43 341997 121212010 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 529.06 TURF CARE 00001982 250817 536615 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 507.68 TURF CARE 00001981 250818 536616 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,036.74 341998 12/2/2010 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 6,620.79 DECKS, BRACKETS, ASSEMBLIES 00001761 250984 JI36495 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 6,620.79 341999 121212010 102692 UNITED HEALTH CARE INS CO 1,120.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 251065 BETTY TOBIN 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,120.00 342000 121212010 100668 URS CORPORATION 3,326.30 PROMENADE PHASE II 250780 4487893 01364.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 3,326.30 342001 12/212010 119476 USPCA REGION 12 80.00 MEMBERSHIP 251029 112910 4607.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 80.00 342002 12/2/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 538.63 LIQUOR BAGS 250819 179591 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 45.30 LIQUOR BAGS 250820 179509 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 69.15 HAND SOAP 250821 179601 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 628.01 LIQUOR BAGS 250822 179592 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 78.46 LIQUOR BAGS 250823 179592 -01 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 44.63 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 251030 180089 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 1,404.18 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Page - 19 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BA -364 PROMENADE PHASE 2 EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 20 12/212010 - 1212/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342003 1212/2010 119454 VINOCOPIA 168.50 250904 0032570 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 140.83 250905 0032491 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 180.27 250906 0032492 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 489.60 342004 1212/2010 123431 WATER WIZARD IRRIGATION 2,615.00 REPAIRS -6400 PARKWOOD RD 251031 101 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2,615.00 342005 121212010 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 566.06 DEC MAINTENANCE 251032 120110 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 566.06 342006 12/212010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,463.80 250907 256634 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 318.30 250908 256627 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 38.67 250909 256630 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 704.25 250910 256629 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,525.02 342007 12/2/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 951.41 250911 341192 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,318.56 250912 341191 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 267.36 250913 341190 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,873.12 251052 341559 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.92 251053 341558 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,414.37 342008 12/212010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,044.14 250914 490778 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,027.70 250915 490779 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 993.30 250916 490780 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 487.55 250917 490781 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,720.78 250918 491713 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 86.15 250919 491714 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,870.95 250920 490776 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 993.30 250921 490774 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,296.86 250922 490775 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 182.83 250923 488274 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,232.70 250924 490146 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,911.62 251054 491715 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 111.65- 101.15- 1.15- 38,633.93 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/2/2010 - 12/2/2010 Doc No Inv No Account No 251055 815750 5842.5512 251056 815749 5842.5512 251057 815753 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 12/112010 7:55:44 Page - ` 21 342009 12/2/2010 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,921.90 250925 683656 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.00 250926 683657 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,814.20 250927 683685 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,912.00 250928 683102 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 78.90 250929 683103 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 10,771.00 342010 12/2/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 215.90 250930 257444 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 595.80 250931 257442 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 129.95 250932 257443 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING 941.65 -342011 12/212010 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 7,135.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 250781 1- 01686 -170 01383.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -383 W44TH ST 3,223.00 W 70TH ST DESIGN 250782 9- 01686 -160 01367.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN - -` BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 1,005.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 250783 33- 01686 -020 1265.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 11,363.50 342012 12/2/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 412.11 51- 8324712 -5 250825 - 261755507 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 96.90 51- 8526048 -8 250826 261757343 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 32.42 51- 6892224 -5 250827 261735177 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 315.58 51- 9251919 -0 250828 261767088 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 1,501.08 51- 6223269 -1 250829 261721801 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 47.15 51- 8997917 -7 250830 261770352 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,287.90 51- 6644819 -9 250831 261730717 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,139.31 51- 5107681-4 250832 261700004 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER - ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 34.09 51- 6541084 -2 250833 261728571 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.56- 51- 8976004 -9 250834 261763719 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR. 7,996.95 51- 9603061 -0 250835 261773004 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER / CENT SVC PW BUILDING 20.12 51- 9770163 -6 250836 261785297 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER'''' STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 99.62 51- 9770164 -7 250837 261778050 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER- STREET. LIGHTING REGULAR 9.08 51- 6050184 -2 250838 261719388 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 1,196.94 51- 9011854-4 250839 261763144 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,115.42 51- 4159265 -8 250986 261536448 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1/2010 7:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 22 12/212010 — 12/212010 Check # Date Amount, Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge? Account Description Business Unit - - 6,420.43 51- 695567.9 -8 251060 261891765 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 29,755.66 342013 12/2/2010 100668 XEROX CORPORATION 269.71 FAX MAINTENANCE 250824 112504536 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 269.71 342014 12/2/2010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 165.00 250933 9945 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 165.00 342016 12/212010 122316 ZACK'S INC. 629.75 SHOVELS, SQUEEGEES 00001228-250987 26387 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ' GENERAL MAINTENANCE 629.75 .342016 12/2/2010 124960 ZAHL.- PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE C f 382.28 REPAIRS TO FUEL TANKS 00005410 250988 0165939 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 382.28 i 760,209.94 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 760,209.94 Total Payments 760,209.94 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1211/2010 7:56:19 Council Check Summary Page - 1 12/2/2010 - 12/212010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 149,169.32 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,027.81 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,390.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 111,711.64 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 29,816.93 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 23,384.07 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,243.41 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,656.35 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 14,419.22 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 13,443.25 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 11,032.37 05800 LIQUOR FUND 134,863.13 05900 UTILITY FUND 53,036.02 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 25,548.14 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,694.39 09900 PAYROLL FUND 182,773.89 Report Totals 760,209.94 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures y� w9& N1r� ow e Cl) 0 • I4CORPOPA9/ 1889 REPORPRECOM M EN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK 0 Discussion ® Information Date: DECEMBER 7, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Susan Howl' Subject: FW: wood smoke NOV From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum.julie @gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:28 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: 'Dianne Plunkett Latham'; 'Julie Risser'; 'Susan Tucker' Subject: wood smoke To the Mayor, City Planner and City Council Members: Dear Mayor Hovland, City Manager and City Council Members, As an Edina resident with asthma and COPD, I want to draw your attention to a severe and increasing air pollutant in Edina: wood smoke. I have spoken to the city council on one occasion about the need for wood smoke awareness and even regulation, because it presents a severe public health hazard that is implicated in asthma attacks, heart attacks, cancer and even sudden infant death syndrome. Wood smoke compomises the immune systems of all citizens, but it is especially hazardous to children, the elderly and anyone with asthma, heart or lung disease, cancer and other disabilities like autism. How can Edina not address this serious problem and hope to get a handle on thie form of fine particle pollution that is at least as big a polluter as vehicle exhaust? Wood smoke is chemically almost identical to tobacco smoke, yet it is far more concentrated, travels farthers and remains chemically active in the body up to 44 hours longer. We cannot smoke in bars and restaurants, but shouldn't be be allowed to breathe free on our own properties? The chemical trespass of wood smoke onto the property of another violates the nuisance ordinances as well as the rights of others to use and enjoy their property smoke -free. Because the health effects of wood smoke are so severe and so well documented, it is hard to believe that there is nowhere a person can turn for relief in Edina. The Health Department really doesn't get involved, and the Fire Department only will put out a fire when they see fit to do so. That occurs only mostly when the recreational fire code is being violated and not when the smoke is making people dangerously ill. The fire department personnel have told me that they "go easy" on people burning, because many of them burn also. I have a simple request: My group, Take Back the Air, has a professional slide presentation on the hazards of wood smoke with scientific data and references. We would like an opportunity to show this to you, Mr. Mayor, and your staff and city council, as an educational tool, and to discuss options for dealing with this problem. I am a member of the Environment Committee's Air and Water Quality Work Group, but have been told that the wood smoke issue will have to be on the back burner for awhile. Why? It is one of the most persistent and noticeeable sources of outdoor air pollution. With asthma at epidemic proportions in Edina schools, the need to address it immediately is paramount. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, (ADA), wood smoke presents a physical "barrier" that prevents people with disabilities like asthma from "accessing" city parks, streets and sidewalks. It is the law. Every day and every night wood smoke prevents my access to city parks, streets and sidewalks and I must remain indoors. I cannot garden or eat outdoors or certainly not walk in the neighborhood most days and nights from fall through spring because of wood smoke. This past Halloween was a nightmare, with intense wood smoke in the streets while children were trick or treating. Unable to be outdoors, I drove around to assess the prevalence of wood burning. I witnessed approximately 3 wood burning firepits per block, set out in front yards very close to homes, and in the streets, causing heavy wood smoke fumes that made the neighborhoods feel like a campground or near a forest fire. I shudder to think how many children may have had asthma attacks that night or a trip to the emergency room the next day, due to wood smoke inhalation. My grandson was sick for days after trick or treating in our neighborhood where burning was rampant and I am concerned for his health as well as other children's health, with their smaller and still developing lungs. sincerely hope you will be receptive to viewing our slide presentation to initiate dialog on this critical matter. Thank you, Julie Mellum Susan Howl Subject: FW: Wood Smoke Pollution NOV 10ir1 From: Lynn joh [mailto:nebula702 @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:07 PM To: kathleen.winters @state.mn.us Subject: Wood Smoke Pollution Hi, I am affiliated with Julie Mellum 's cause against outdoor wood burning fire pits. Just this Halloween my neighbor to the north- the Deegans on 6529 Ridgeview Dr., Edina, MN. 55439, burned wood outdoors in their pit. Fortunately the wind was almost non- existent, so did not notice it indoors, but outdoors the stench was unbearable. Isn't it enough to put up with indoor fireplace burning that pollutes the air during winter, but also year round with outdoor burning especially in urban/suburban areas? The air we breathe is very precious, we do not need more cancer producing particles from wood smoke. Urge you and others to stop this unnecessary recreational burning. Sincerely, Lynn Johnson Edina,MN. Susan Howl Subject: FW: City manager & city council members NOV fM From: Joan Wierzba [mailto:jwierzba @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 3:00 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: To: City manager & city council members Hello, Currently 4 different waste collection trucks come down our neighborhood's streets each Friday to pick up the trash. They are big, heavy trucks that cause some noise, lots of wear and tear on our streets, and unnecessary truck fuel usage. I'm sure this happens all throughout Edina. Wouldn't it make more sense if Edina contracted with a single waste collection company? It would probably be a reduction to the customers' waste bill plus (as mentioned above) cause less wear to our streets. I suppose some folk are "attached" to their current waste collection company, but the positives to having one company seem to out weigh this affiliation. Thanks, Joan Wierzba 6217 Belmore Lane Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Council and Mayor re: 9 mile creek path Subject: T0: City Council and Mayor re: 9 mile creek path NOV Please forward this to the members of the City Council and Mayor. I am unable to attend the meeting 12/7 on the proposed 9 mile creek path. I strongly support the path along the creek. The route will be much safer, convenient and certainly more scenic. Most communities and even the bordering landowners find that once the path is in it is an asset and increases property values. Paths are so much nicer than street routes. Routing along the street in Edina is a second class solution. I've ridden on many of the other trails and they all seem to be independent paths, often through more scenic environments. It's so nice to just get on one of the paths and ride /walk /skate along without worry of traffic and intersections. There is simply is no comparison between a street route and a path along the creek. The street route can't even be called a path, it's riding on the street. The creek path is a true asset to the community and a pleasure to all. Please vote for the Creek route! Denny Johnson Barbara Swain 6700 Cahill Rd. Edina MN 555439 952 - 841 -0170 1 Susan Howl ,subject: Upcoming Council Meeting on Regional Trail'` Dear members of the Edina City Council, 0 ._ 1010 I am taking the liberty to write to you today to express very strong support in favor of the proposed "Creek Based Route" and my hope that you will vote in favor of it. I would normally be at the 12/7 meeting however I will be prepping for a surgical procedure that I will undergo the next day, hence my email. In short, here is why Edina should chose the Creek -Site Route: Benefits of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - Creek -Site Route The creek -side route of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will be a tremendous asset to Edina. It represents the best and safest option for all of our citizens. The construction of the creek -side trail provides several benefits. It will: Create a new park. By constructing the creek -side trail through Edina, Three Rivers Park District will create a beautiful new park that links together many of our existing parks in Edina. It will be a wonderful amenity for all Edina residents to enjoy, and a superior addition to our renowned Three Rivers regional trail system. Provide the safest route. The creek route is the safest route for children and families to enjoy. The street routes are much less safe for children, given the driveways and busy intersections the trail would follow. Enhance Nine Mile Creek. Nine Mile Creek is not the pristine natural resource it once was, long ago. Today it's on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's impaired waters list, given the years of agricultural and yard waste (including ongoing fertilizer runoff from surrounding yards). It is full of invasive, non - native species of plants. Construction of the new park and planned creek restoration will add in native plants, and actually help improve water quality. Open up public land for the public to enjoy. The multi -use regional trail will be built on public land — areas that previously have only been enjoyed by the property owners whose yards adjoin that property. It will become a beautiful park that can be enjoyed by everyone! Promote a healthy lifestyle. A regional trail encourages healthy outdoor aerobic activities such as walking, jogging and biking by people of all ages and skill levels in a safe, park -like setting. Be built at no additional cost to the community. Some people have expressed concerns about the cost of the Edina trail. we do not share those concerns. The trail will be underwritten by Three Rivers Park District through a variety of funding sources — not by increased taxes. Like all of the cities that surround us, Edina has been paying a $3.5 million annual fee to Three Rivers Park District for years. Other communities, such as Hopkins, Minnetonka and Bloomington, have benefited from construction of trails through their communities; now it's Edina's turn! Best regards, Lorenzo Tunesi 4413 Ellsworth Dr Edina, MN 55435 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please direct to the Mayor, City Council members, and City Engineer - - - -- Original Message - - - -- 10�U From: Thomas Raeuchle [ mailto :traeuchle @culturaldilemma.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:30 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please direct to the Mayor, City Council members, and City Engineer Ladies and Gentlemen, I recently received the proposed assessment statement for the Edina Country Club Neighborhood Reconstruction Contract No. Eng 08 -1, Improvement No. A -213. It lists my total assessment as $ 11,468.98 and the interest rate as 5.75 %, followed by a spread sheet attempting to illustrate a 10 year repayment calculation. All the numbers in the spreadsheet are incorrect. I have no idea where they come from and how they relate to the assessment amount. I verified with the City Engineering Department, they don't know either. Obviously nobody checked these numbers before they went out to every resident in country club. This type of carelessness is unprofessional and extremely embarrassing. I expect better. It raises the question of the correctness of all other numbers, including the assessment amount. How do I know that one was checked? I thought you should know. Respectfully Thomas Raeuchle 4634 Bruce Avenue 1 Susan Howl PP route Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Trail - I support the creek -side RECLU- t.�.�• ,�d Z010 - - - -- original Message -` - - -- _. From: Bob- „[mailto:bobader @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December.01, 2010 12:33 AM To:' Lynette Biunno Subject: Nine Mile Creek Trail - I support the creek -side route Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: I'm.writin'g because I will be out of town next Tuesday and will.not be able to attend the hearing on the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail route. I want.to let you know that I support the creek -side route. As an avid cyclist, I look forward to having an off -road bike trail that connects many of our parks as well as a larger syst,em.� It's a bit ironic, I think, that I have to -.go to Minneapolis for such amenities. The more we create accessible opportunities for people to enjoy the outdoors, get exercise, and enjoy our parks, the better off we will all be. I am sympathetic to property owners that will be most directly affected by a creek -side route. Those that are most vocal have emphasized adverse impacts. I believe there are many positive impacts for property owners not to mention the myriad of benefits for the larger community that they too can enjoy. I commend you and the other leaders of our community for the very thoughtful, diligent process that has brought us to this point. Now is the time to take a very forward - looking stand for the benefit of all in our community. Regards, Bob Aderhold 3529 West 54th Street Edina 55410 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:08 AM To: John Keprios W,7. 1, 3' L. , Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: bike trail NOV 3' 0 2010 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunnooci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Audrey Kingstrom [mailto:akingstrom @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:01 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: bike trail To Whom It May Concern: Since I am unable to attend next week's City Council meeting regarding the bike trail, I am writing in support of the creek -side route. I realize that many residents who live along the creek are upset about this proposal but I do think we need to think about the long -term implications of our decisions. Off -road, dedicated biking trails will be most successful in the long run and will greatly increase the "live- ability" and "desire- ability" of Edina now and in the future. Of course, residents who are negatively impacted by the creek -side route should be fairly compensated and their issues be addressed as reasonably as possible. I doubt few current affected residents will see the benefits of a trail in their backyards, but for future owners, such a nearby trail could be viewed as an asset. I am in complete support of the trail route that follows the creek as much as is logistically feasible. I urge our city leaders to adopt this plan. Thank you for your attention. Audrey Kingstrom 3529 West 54th St. Edina 952 - 924 -1039 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike Trail Hearing on December 7 NOV 0 1010 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Duncan Sinclair [mailto:duncsin @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 2:10 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Bike Trail Hearing on December 7 I am in favor of the Nine Mile Creek Trail through Edina. As a 31 year Edina resident and an avid biker, I have enjoyed the bike paths through the other parts of the Western Suburbs and think it is time for Edina to step up and do its share to support these valuable recreational facilities. I support the Creek -side alternative as it appears to be safer, more user - friendly, and more scenic. I request that the Council support the trail and specifically, the creek -side option. Thank you. Duncan Sinclair 6220 Loch Moor Dr. Edina 55439 1 Robert]. De brey RECEIV 4502 Browndale Avenue NOV t Edina, Minnesota, 55424 Ph 952 922 7711 November 29, 2010 Edina City Council v 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 CC: Assessing Department Public Works Department Sub: Edina Country Club Reconstruction Street Improvement NO. A -214 Property PID: 1802824220061 Assessment: $15,370.74 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am enclosing our prepayment of the above ao essment. However, I wish to bring to your attention an unresolved condition at our address related to street improvement No. A -214. The street and sidewalk repair and street lighting work were all delivered on time and in good order. We are pleased with the work accomplished. Last winter, following the completion of the project, Edina snow plows damaged the curb in front of our home, the new curbing which we are paying for herewith. I do not have a good feeling about paying you upwards of $15,000. while being left with an eyesore of damaged curbing in front of our $million dollar property. We are not alone in this situation. There are other new curbs in this district with similar damage. Normal wear and tear over the next 30 years, no problem. Year 1 damage due to careless or incompetent snow plow operation, unacceptable. I am hereby requesting that all newly installed curbs of this project which have sustained snow plow damage be promptly repaired to their original aesthetic condition early in the Spring of 2011. I look forward to your response to this request. SincerelaRobert brey RECEIVED Comments to the Edina City Council December 7, 2010 NOV 2 5 2010 r aware that I am sounding like a broken record when I continue to write on the financial ,blems facing Three Rivers Park District in building and maintaining a "creek route" regional trail through Edina. It is my continued hope that someone will listen and not subject the citizens of Edina to future unfunded financial liabilities. For your information I am attaching a copy of the Three Rivers Park District 2011 General Fund Operating Budget. Several things in the Budget are worth noting. TRPD is dependent on a statutory limit of .03224% of assessed valuation for 83% of its operating revenue. Assessed valuation and collections are declining. These decreases will "severely limit the Park Districts ability to raise tax revenues to maintain existing operations." The Park District has received over a million dollars in State Grants for operations in the past. Given the Minnesota six billion dollar deficit, Republican controlled State legislature, and results of the 2010 election reflecting the publics mood to reduce unnecessary spending, receiving grants from the State or Federal Government will be very difficult. The Park district has only $1,838,445 of unused tax levy authority, this is down from $4,241,822 in 2010, a reduction of 56 %. If this same reduction occurs in 2011 the Park District will not be able to fund any additional operations, including additions to the system. Park District has eliminated the "contingency fund" and "capital outlays" from its 2011 Jget. These are the funds an organization would use to fund unforeseen events, such as flood damage, and replace worn equipment. These eliminations are being made while salaries and administration costs are being increased. These are the classic actions of an organization which has expended during economic upturns beyond its capacity to fund its operations during economic downturns. When considering whether to grant an easement to TRPD to build a trail along the "creek route" it is my hope the city council would consider the following: The information contained in the 2011 TRPD General Fund Operating Budget indicates there is a high probability TRPD will not have the financial resources in the future to maintain and provide security on the Edina section of the trail. This is especially true when one considers the Edina Trail is only one of a number of Trails that TRPD plans to add to its system. With 6000' of raised wooden boardwalk the Creek Route section of the trail will have a high maintenance coefficient. If TRPD is financially unable to provide maintenance and security, will that burden be transferred to the City of Edina? The creek route contains a large number of engineering, permitting, and funding questions which are unanswered and which could greatly increase the cost and time necessary to construct a creek route trail. Among these are: How does one construct 6000' of boardwalk in loodway parallel to the stream flow without restricting the flow? The project will likely quire an individual 404 Corps of Engineers permit which opens the permitting process to public comment and inquiry. Will the Corps issue a permit if a viable alternative route exists? Permits are also required by the DNR, FEMA, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District,etc. Will these permits be approved? The results of the 2010 election, both local and national, indicate the voting public,wants a reduction in public spending. Is a creek route regional trail through Edina a `necessary" expenditure of public funds? Are grant funds likely to be available? It is obvious from their operations budget that TRPD has expanded beyond its ability to adequately fund its operations with existing revenues. I would hope the city council would consider very very carefully before ceding control of its park lands and entering into a partnership with an organization which, according to its own statements, is facing sever financial difficulties. Wm Westerdahl 5912 Walnut Dr. Edina, MN 55436 0 2011 General Fund Operating Budget November 18, 2010 ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae Introduction........................................................................ ............................... 1 Challenges Facing the Park District in 2011 and Beyond ............ ............................... 1 Priorities of the 2011 General Fund Operating Budget ............... ............................... 2 Funding for the 2011 General Fund Operating Budget ............... ............................... 3 Financial Summaries Revenue Summary by Source ......................................... ............................... 5 Expenditure Summary by Type ....................................... ............................... 6 Expenditure Summary by Function .................................. ............................... 7 Comparison of Actual 2010 and Proposed 2011 Property Tax Levy ...................... 9 Full Time Equivalent Positions by Division ................................. .............................11 Introduction Development of the Park District's 2011 General Fund Operating Budget was a cooperative effort between the Board of Commissioners and Park District staff. The budget process began with an overview of the economic issues confronting the taxpayers of suburban Hennepin County. The Board subsequently called for the 2011 budget to include no increase in the property tax levy. Based on this .direction, staff reviewed the 2010 budget and, where appropriate, reallocated resources to align funding and expenditures with activities that furthered the organization's goals. In addition, staff prepared plans for new initiatives with the understanding that they could only be funded if new park use revenue was available. The Board reviewed and discussed the parameters and priorities used in preparing a preliminary draft of the Budget before authorizing staff to prepare the 2010 General Fund Operating Budget. The budget can be viewed as a set numbers showing what resources are available and how an organization is planning to use them. However, the real value of a budget comes from understanding the organization's goals and priorities that helped determine how the resources would be used, as well as how the organization is impacted and plans to react to various external factors. In other words, the budget should be a policy document defining how and why the organization will function. By preparing the Park District's 2011 General Fund Operating Budget as a policy document, the Park District hopes that readers of this budget will gain insight into what the Park District is attempting to accomplish and the challenges it faces. Challenges Facing the Park District in 2011 and Beyond In light of the costs associated with providing services for an ever - increasing number of park and trail users, the economic slowdown that started in 2008 continues to be the major challenge facing the Park District. Property tax revenues, which comprise 83% of the budgeted revenue, have been impacted by a reduced collection rate combined with a shrinking tax base. The Park District is required by state law to levy taxes based on a 98% collection rate. While the average collection rate for the past decade has been closer to 99 %, the rate has dropped closer to 98% over the past two years. Should the rate fall below 98 %, there would be the potential for a revenue shortfall that could impact operations. In addition to decreasing collection rates, the valuation of the Park District's tax base decreased for a second straight year after more than two decades of steady, sometimes double digit, growth. The decrease in valuation is a combination of the slowing housing market and the increase in foreclosures over the past several years. The Park District's ability to levy taxes for operations is limited to .03224% of this valuation, meaning that as the valuation decreases, the levy limit for the Park District also decreases. While Park District tax levies have not approached this limit in the past, continued decreases in valuation will severely limit the Park District's ability to raise tax revenues to maintain existing operations. The economic slowdown also impacted Minnesota state government. The state legislature spent much of the 2010 legislative session dealing with budget issues, and projections from the state indicate that the 2011 legislature will need to deal with balancing a budget that starts with a deficit greater than six billion dollars. The solution to this problem could include a number of cuts in funding to local governments. The Park District, which receives over one million dollars - 1 - in operating funds from the State, certainly could be impacted by reductions in state funds for 2011 and/or 2012. The Park District will need to closely monitor the state's handling of future deficits to best manage the impact to operations. Park and trail usage for Three Rivers continues to increase substantially each year, which is in contrast to park and trail use throughout the balance of the metropolitan Minneapolis /St. Paul area which has slightly decreased in recent years. The Park District's growth in visitors can be traced to increased usage of regional trails and higher than anticipated use of Silverwood Park. While increased, park use is clearly a major goal for the Park District and has benefits to the public, there are also maintenance costs that increase as park use increases. The 2011 budget includes some minor revenue and expenditure increases to account for increased usage and increasing costs. In order to ensure that Three Rivers can set meaningful priorities as funding becomes more difficult, the Board of Commissioners adopted a vision plan in July of 2010 that outlines the Park District's commitment to maintain natural resources and promote recreation over the next ten years. The vision includes 31 specific actions that the Park District will undertake during the next decade, including both major construction and system -wide operational changes. The plan and its actions, which is an extension of the Park District's mission, are designed to guide future resource allocation decisions and ensure that funds are appropriated to activities and functions that further the Park District's mission. The Park District's Proposed 2011 General Fund Operating Budget totals $34,804,060, which is a decrease of $11,079, or 0.03 %, from the 2010 budget. The proposed 2011 General Fund budget provides funding for the priorities identified below through a combination of increased park guest fees, reprioritization of costs and other sources. Priorities of the 2011 General Fund Operating Budget Maintain high standards for quality facilities, programs and recreational opportunities without increasing propeLty taxes paid by the taxpayers of suburban Hennepin County. The 2011 General Fund Operating Budget continues to provide the public with the high quality facilities, programs and recreational opportunities for which the Park District is known and respected. Accordingly, priority for funding in 2011 was given to those budget initiatives that maintain and support the level of service provided in past years. With clear Board direction that there would be no increase in the property tax levy, any increase in "base budget" costs (including employee wages and benefits, utilities and other fixed costs) needed to be offset by either additional park use revenues or reduced operating expenses. To help offset these increases, the Park District has eliminated the budgeted contingency and reallocated funds previously identified for capital equipment and the publication of the system map. These reallocations will be reviewed and reconsidered in 2011 and beyond if adequate park use revenues are available. -2- Continue to address natural resource management issues. Management of open space and the natural resources contained in almost 27,000 acres is a primary function of the Park District. It is also an issue that that continues to grow in importance to the public. The 2011 General Fund Operating Budget will continue to provide the resources necessary to fund water quality testing and studies, wildlife study and management, reforestation, prairie restoration and maintenance of landscaped areas. Begin implementation of actions in the Park District's Vision Plan The Park District's Vision Plan includes 31 policy, collaboration, education and development actions designed to meet the following goals: • Protect the regions water and natural resources • Inspire people to recreate • Connect people to nature • Create vibrant places • Collaborate across boundaries The 2011 General Fund Operating Budget includes reallocation of existing staff time required to begin working on the highest priority actions. Continue to coordinate with nei hboring cities, townships and counties. The Park District's Vision Plan includes a number of actions that are, specifically focused on collaboration across boundaries. With the Park District's jurisdiction including 45 cities and townships, coordination with these entities is required to efficiently and effectively operate and maintain the Park District's 20 regional parks and park reserves and more than 100 miles of regional trails. Efforts to coordinate and work together will continue to provide public benefits, including higher quality land and resource management and increased recreational and educational opportunities. Promote the Park District's mission through programming and service to park guests. Education and recreation experiences designed to promote increased knowledge and appreciation for nature along with environmental stewardship will continue to be the focus of programming in 2011. Demand for individual and group education remains strong, and in areas such as cultural history, historic re- creation and farm education, Three Rivers will work to develop and expand program offerings. Funding for the 2011 General Fund Operating Budget Funding for the 2011 General Fund Operating Budget, which totals $34,804,060, is provided by property taxes, user fees, intergovernmental revenues and other miscellaneous revenues. The following table summarizes the sources of funding over the last 4 years: -3- Source of Revenue 2008 Actual 2009 Actual 2010 Budget 2011 Budget 2011 Budget Over /(Under) 2010 Bud et Dollars % Property Taxes $27,122,682 $28,763,269 $29,101,148 $29,101,148 - -- - -- % Park Use 3,556,192 4 149 296 3,999,047 4 089 243 90,196 2.26% Grants -Met Council Operations and Maintenance 892,055 871,442 764,372 764,372 - -- - -- Grants -Other 241 201 283,063 152 910 165,910 13,000 8.50% Interfund Transfers 524,542 305,3 374,525 299,525 (75,000) 20.03% Interest Income 586 924 249,187 220 000 220,000 - -- - -- Other Revenue 355,378 365,088 203,137 163,862 (39,275) 9.28% Total Revenue $33,278,974 34,986,650 34 815 139 $34,804,060 ($11,079) 0.03% With the Board of Commissioners instructing staff to prepare the 2011 budget with no property tax increase, efforts were focused on preparing more accurate estimates of park use and other revenues. The additional park use revenue is a combination of increased fees and changes to budgeted amounts based on past history. The most significant of the fee increases is a twenty cent per participant increase in scheduled group fees. During 2010, the Park District will be completing an analysis of potential alternative revenue sources. While this analysis will not impact the 2010 budget, it could provide additional revenue streams to fund future operations. A more detailed listing of revenues in the 2010 budget can be found on the Revenue Summary by Source table included in the following section. 2011 GENERAL FUND- OPERATING BUDGET REVENUE_.SUMMARY,BY SOURCE _._... Park Use Special Use Fees 676,711 690,085 679,939 760,939 - 2011 Budget Public Programming 357,042 429,318 2010 502,124 Over /(Under) Group Education 2008 2009 Amended 2011 2010 Budget Source of Revenue Actual Actual Budget Budget Dollars Property Taxes 202,077 213,104 191,256 222,980. 31,724 Current $26,855,251 $28,479,308 $29,031448 $29,031,148 -- Delinquent 267,431 2831961 ; 70,000 70,000 -- -- Total Property Taxes 27,122,682 28,763,269. 29,101,148 29,101,148 -- -- Park Use Special Use Fees 676,711 690,085 679,939 760,939 81,000 Public Programming 357,042 429,318 416,373 502,124 85,751 Group Education 405,295 408,929 448,851 413,511 (35,340) Reservations 213,396 213,253 219,755 219,755 -- Rental 202,077 213,104 191,256 222,980. 31,724 Camping 250,239 265,807 250,000 250,000 -- Tubing and Alpine Skiinc 560,211 667,239 544,671 615,000 70,329 Cross Country Ski Fees 215,314 324,109 215,000 240,000 25,000 Facility Use Fees 206,474 380,748 405,059 412,056 6,997 Other 469,433 556,704 628,143 452,878 (175,265) Total Park Use 3,556,192 4,149,296 3,999,047 4,089,243 90,196 Grants Federal State - Oper. & Maint State - PERA Aid State - Public Safety State - Minnaqua State - Pollution Control Hennepin Parks Foundation Other Local Grants Total Grants 11.91% 20.59% (7.87% 16.59% 12.91% 11.63% 1.73% (27.90 %) 2.26% 4,840 -- -- -- -- -- 892,055 871,442 764,372 764,372 -- -- 45,910 45,910 45,910 45,910 -- -- 172,583 187,525 95,000 120,000 25,000 26.32% 6,822 -- 4,000 -- (4,000) (100.00 %) -- 37,940 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,000 -- (8,000) (100.00 %) 11,046 1,000 -- -- -- -- 1,133,256 1,143,817 917,282 930,282 13,000 1.42% Transfers Operating Transfers From: Noerenberg Trust Fund 91,265 69,790 131,810 56,810 (75,000) (56.90 %) Enterprise Funds 35,887 35,887 43,087 43,087 -- -- Park Maintenance Fund 196,000 199,628 _ 1991628 199,628 -- -- Total Trari'sfers 323,152 305,305 374,525 299,525 (75,000) (20.03 %) Other Interest Income 438,923 330,581 220,000 220,000 -- -- Unrealized Gain /(Loss) on Investments 148;001 (81,394) -- -- -- -- Charges for Services 181,302 164,743 102,275 74,000 (28,275) (27.65 %) Court Fines 88,673 103,725 69,000 69,000 -- -- Miscellaneous Revenue 85,403 96,620 31,862 20,862 (11,000) (34.52 %) Total Other 942;302 614,275 423,137 383,862 (39,275) (9.28%) Total Revenue $33,077,584 $34,975,962 $34,815,139 $34,804,060 ($11,079) (.03 %) -5- 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY TYPE 2M. 2010 2011 Budget Over (Under) Type of 2008 2009 Amended 2011 2010 Budget Expenditure Actual Actual Budget Budget Dollars Percent Personal Services $ 22,761,931 $25,053,267 $26,144,503 $26,902,519 $ 758,016 2.90% Commodities and Supplies 1,095,387 1,377,666 1,295,113 1,214,940 (80,173) (6.19%) Contracted Services 4,455,682 5,250,201 5,025,246 4,899,191 (126,055) (2.51 %) Other Charges 1,611,854 1,605,664 1,547,159 1,633,159 86,000 5.56% Capital Outlay 623,989 595,089 398,867 -- (398,867) (100.00 %) Contingency -- -- 250,000 -- (250,000) (100.00 %) Transfers to Other Funds 159,383 161,176 154,251 154,251 -- -- TOTAL $ 30,708,226 $34,043,063 $34,815,139 $34,804,060 $ (11,079) (0.03 %) 2M. 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION 2011 Budget 2010 Over /(Under) 2008 2009 Amended 2011 2010 Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget Dollars Office of the Board of Commissioners and Superintendent Board of Commissioners $ 281,533 $ 323,984 $ 289,853 $ 294,545 $ 4,692 1.62% Office of the Superintendent 600,842 614,362 533,067 585,413 52,346 9.82% Finance 2,006,526 1,981,013 1,834,370 1,895,160 60,790 3.31% Planning & Development 1,435,897 1,651,180 1,650,621 1,666,519 15,898 0.96% Total Office of the Board Commissioners and Superintendent 4,324,798 4,570,539 4,307,911 4,441,637 133,726 3.10% Recreation and Education Division Management 473,442 551,075 445,106 445,465 359 0.08% Park Facility Management 290,767 341,113 377,496 383,726 6,230 1.65% Park Facility Services 1,914,496 1,999,606 2,151,394 2,034,011 (117,383) (5.46% Recreation Programming Management 114,660 120,348 146,870 153,095 6,225 4.24% Recreation Programming & Baker Near Wilderness Settlement 635,269 723,759 686,707 723,814 37,107 5.40% Cultural History Interpretation -- -- 78,631 81,780 3,149 100.000, Outdoor Education Management 111,783 121,207 130,426 131,019 593 0.45% Outdoor Education 1,877,248 2,039,833 2,119,613 2,161,181 41,568 1.96% Special Facilities 1,134,986 1,474,136 1,838,319 1,930,473 92,154 5.01% Volunteers 256,033 262,195 284,145 296,049 11,904 4.19% Visitor Services 436,000 536,995 569,339 575,080 5,741 1.01% Group Sales 192,369 197,404 201,521 208,420 6,899 3.42% Total Recreation and Education 7,437,053 8,367,671 9,029,567 9,124,113 94,546 1.05% -7- 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION Central Services 2011 Budget 2010 Over /(Under) 2009 Amended 2011 2010 Budget Actual Budget Budget Dollars 420,014 2008 Actual Parks and Natural Resources Division Management 404,809 Natural Resources 194,243 Management 148,354 Park Maintenance 227,242 Management 154543 Park Maintenance 6,476,479 Central Services 2011 Budget 2010 Over /(Under) 2009 Amended 2011 2010 Budget Actual Budget Budget Dollars 420,014 344,995 346,517 1,522 0.44% 186,025 189,271 194,243 4,972 2.63% 181,306 205,873 227,242 21,369 10.38% 7,013,338 7,255,599 7,342,835 87,236 1.20% Management 1151849 293,376 189,029 193,264 4,235 Carpentry 621,834 637,922 658,177 680,913 22,736 Administrative Center 105,367 103,153 111,050 111,050 -- Horticulture 112,683 155,998 169,673 170,755 1,082 Forestry 1,355,802 1,483,134 1,494,059 1,511,332 17,273 Wildlife 4601912 536,043 525,260 516,084 (9,176) Water Quality 409,509 530,010 478,692 494,080 15,388 Public Safety 3,376,973 3,755,155 3,922,032 4,119,805 197,773 Total Parks and 623,989 Natural Resources 13,743,114 15,295,474 15,543,710 15,908,120 364,410 Administration Division Management Research & Evaluation Marketing & Communications Governmental Relations Information Technology Human Resources Training Total Administration Capital Outlay 2.24% 3.45% 0.64% 1.16% (1.75 %) 3.21% 5.04% 2.34% 318,904 366,951 443,355 459,202 15,847 3.57% 334,687 239,862 275,261 271,115 (4,146) (1.51 %) 1,187,333 1,668,995 1,590,060 1,526,713 (63,347) (3.98%) 189,498 157,530 174,407 180,714 6,307 3.62% 1,249,865 1,262,202 1,301,088 1,308,984 7,896 0.61% 1,083,368 1,239,012 1,218,792 1,298,038 79,246 6.50% 56,234 118,562 127,870 131,173 3,303 2.58% 4,419,889 5,053,114 5,130,833 5,175,939 45,106 0.88% 623,989 595,089 398,867 -- (398,867) (100.00 %) Operating Transfers 159,383 Contingency 161,176 154,251 154,251 -- -- -- 250,000 -- (250,000) (100.00 %) TOTAL EXPENDITURE; $ 30,708,226 $ 34,043,063 $ 34,815,139 $ 34,804,060 $ (11,079) (0.03%) THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT COMPARISON OF ACTUAL 2010 AND PROPOSED 2011 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Gross amount required from Property Tax Percent Increase Divided by collection rate of 98.0 %, (Operating Budget only) Amount required from Property Tax Levy (Operating Budget = 73.13%) (Debt Service = 26.87%) Less: Fiscal Disparities LOCAL LEVY NEEDED OPERATING BUDGET DEBT SERVICE TOTAL 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 $29,004,148 98% $29,004,148 0.00%, 98% $29,596,069 $29,596,069 $10,869,597 N/A $10,869,597 0.00% N/A $10,869,597 $10,869,597 $39,873,745 N/A $39,873,745 0.00% N/A $40,465,666 $40,465,666 (2,428,639) (2,529,284) (917,055) (928,917) (3,345,694) (3,458,201) $27,167,430 $27,066,785 $9,952,542 $9,940,680 $37,119,972 $37,007,465 Value used for levy rate $1,065,058,494 $984,066,450 $1,065,058,494 $984,066,450 $1,065,058,494 $984,066,450 (x) Net Tax Capacity Rate 0.02551 0.02751 0.00934 0.01011 0.03485 0.03762 LEVY BY HENNEPIN COUNTY $27,169,642 $27,071,668 $9,947,646 $9,948,912 $37,117,289 $37,020,580 Tax Levy for Operations Limit (Total Market Value Percentage 12011 Property Tax Levy Unused Tax Levy Authority $97,501,595,700 0.03224% 31,434,514 29,596,069 $1,838,445 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT COMPARISON OF 2010 AND PROPOSED 2011 PROPERTY TAX AMOUNTS FOR SELECTED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES OPERATING BUDGET DEBT SERVICE TOTAL 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 If market value = $250,000 $250,000 $232,250 $250,000 $232,250 $250,000 $232,250 Tax Capacity @ 1.00% $2,500 $2,323 $2,500 $2,323 $2,500 $2,323 (x) Net Tax Capacity Rate (decimal) 0.02551 0.02751 0.00934 0.01011 0.03485 0.03762 Three Rivers Park District Tax $63.78 $63.91 $23.35 $23.49 $87.13 $87.39 ,�. If market value = $325,000: $325,000 $301,925 $325,000 $301,925 $325,000 $301,925 Tax Capacity @ 1.00% $3,250 $3,020 $3,250 $3,020 $3,250 $3,020 (x) Net Tax Capacity Rate (decimal) 0.02551 0.02751 0.00934 0.01011 0.03485 0.03762 Three Rivers Park District Tax $82.91 $83.08 $30.36 $30.53 $113.27 $113.61 If market value = $400,000: $400,000 $371,600 $400,000 $371,600 $400,000 $371,600 Tax Capacity @ 1.00% $4,000 $3,716 $4,000 $3,716 $4,000 $3,716 (x) Net Tax Capacity Rate (decimal) 0.02551 0.02751 0.00934 0.01011 0.03485 0.03762 Three Rivers Park District Tax $102.04 $102.23 $37.36 $37.57 $139.40 $139.80 For each example, it is assumed that the market value of the property from 2010 to 2011 will decrease by 7.1% which is the decrease in valuation for the Park District as a whole. 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Full -Time E uivalents 2010 2011 Positions Superintendent (1) 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Secretary (2) 1.50 1.50 Senior Manager of Planning (1) 1.00 1.00 Legal Counsel 1 0.70 0.70 Chief Financial Officer (1) 1.00 1.00 Finance Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 Accountant (1) 1.00 1.00 Accounting Technician (2) 2.00 2.00 Payroll Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Revenue Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Revenue Analysts (5) 4.30 4.30 Records Management Clerk (1) 1.00 1.00 Clerk Typist 1 0.50 0.50 Director of Planning and Development (1) 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager of Civil Engineer (1) 1.00 1.00 Senior Engineering Technician (1) 1.00 1.00 Engineer (1) 1.00 1.00 Graduate Engineer (1) 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager of Landscape Architect (1) 1.00 1.00 Landscape Architect (2) 2.00 2.00 Designer (1) 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager of Planning (1) 1.00 1.00 Planner (1)- 1.00 1.00 Intergovernmental Relations Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 GIS Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 GIS Database Administrator (1) 1.00 1.00 GIS Technician (1) 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Department Secrets 1 1.00 1.00 Total - Regular Full Time Equivalent Positions 35.00 35.00 Total - Temporary/ Intermittent Hours 2,929 3,158 Note: Positions shown are for the General Fund Operating Budget Only. Some positions ma, be funded by other sources or split between the General Fund Operating Budget and other budgets. - 11 - 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS DIVISION OF RECREATION AND EDUCATION - Full -Time Equivalents Positions 2010 2011 Associate Superintendent for Recreation and Education (1) 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Director of Outdoor Education (1) 1.00 1.00 Cultural Resources Program Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Pro ram and Facility Coordinator 1 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager of Facility Services (1) 0.80 0.80 Senior Manager of Alpine Services (10 0.35 0.35 Park Operation Supervisor (5) 4.60 4.60 Golf Operations Supervisor (1) 0.20 0.20 Facility Supervisor (7) 6.50 6.50 Facility Attendant (10) 4.89 4.43 Shift Leader (1) 2.00 0.46 Facility Coordinator (3) 0.75 2.75 Golf Program Supervisor (1) 0.20 0.20 Division Secrets 3 2.80 2.80 Senior Manager of Outdoor Education (1) 1.00 1.00 Recreation Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Recreation Program Specialist ('4) 3.20 3.30 Program Secretary (1) 0.63 0.63 Receptionist/ Secretary (1) 0.50 0.50 Near Wilderness Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Interpretive Naturalist (2) 1.60 1.60 Farm Operations Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Specialist I - Farm Operator (1) 1.00 1.00 Farm Program Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Farm Educator (2) 1.80 1.80 Community Supported Agriculture Coordinator (1) 0.80 0.80 Program /Facility Secretary (2) 1.80 1.80 Historic Murphy's Landing Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Cultural Heritage Interpreter (2) 1.60 1.60 Historical Program Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Program /Facility Secretary (2) - 1.40 1.40 Silverwood Park Outdoor Education Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Arts Educator (2) 1.60 1.60 Facility Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Program/Facility Secretary (2 ) 2.00 2.00 Volunteer Services Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 Volunteer Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Volunteer Services Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Receptionist/ Secretary 1 0.50 0.50 Note: Positions shown are for the General Fund Operating Budget Only. Some positions may be funded by other sources or split between the General Fund Operating Budget and other budgets. -12- 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS DIVISION OF RECREATION AND EDUCATION (Continued) Full -Time Equivalent Positions 2010 11 2011 Senior Manager of Outdoor Education (1) 1.00 1.00 Outdoor Education Supervisor (4) 4.00 4.00 Interpretive Naturalist (22) 16.95 16.95 Nature Center Secretary/Receptionist 10 5.69 5.69 Guest Services Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 Reservationist (3) 3.00 3.00 Receptionist /Switchboard Operator (3) 2.35 2.35 Group Program Sales Coordinator (2) 2.00 2.00 Group Sales Assistant 1 0.50 0.50 Total - Regular Full Time Equivalent Positions 1 95.01 95.11 Total - Tem Pora r /Intermittent Hours I 120,138 125,175 DIVISION OF PARKS AND NATURAL RESOURCES Full -Time E uivalents 2009 2010 Positions Associate Superintendent for Parks and Natural Resources (1) 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Park and Natural Resources Coordinator 1 1.00 1.00 Director of Maintenance (1) 0.50 0.50 Central Services Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 Central Services Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Specialist II - Electrician (1) 1.00 1.00 Construction Services Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Specialist II - Carpenter (5) 4.70 4.70 Senior Manager of Parks and Trails Maintenance (1) 0.80 0.80 Park Maintenance Supervisor (6) 6.00 6.00 Ski and Golf Maintenance Supervisor (1) 0.35 0.35 Golf Maintenance Supervisor (1) 0.20 0.20 Crew Chief (10) 8.10 9.10 Park Technician (12) 12.90 11.90 Park Keeper (10) 9.60 9.60 Park Worker (14) 13.37 13.37 , Nursery Workers (1) 0.23 0.23 Specialist I - Coon Rapids Dam (1) 1.00 1.00 Specialist I -Golf (1) 0.20 0.20 Specialist I /Crew Chief - Swim Pond (2) 2.00 2.00 Specialist I /Crew Chief - Skiing 1.00 1.00 Specialist I - Ski Hill (1) 0.65 0.65 Specialist II - Ski Hill (1) 0.25 0.25 Golf Technician (2) 0.75 0.75 Custodian 14 13.20 13.20 Note: Positions shown are for the General Fund Operating Budget Only. Some positions may be funded by other sources or split between the General Fund Operating Budget and other budgets. - 13 - 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS DIVISION OF PARKS AND NATURAL RESOURCES (Continued) Full -Time E uivalents 2010 2011 Positions Director of Natural Resources Management (1) 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager of Forestry (1) 1.00 1.00 Horticulture Operations Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Spec 1 Landscape Specialist (1) 1.00 1.00 Spec I Gardener (1) 1.00 1.00 Forestry Operations Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 Natural Resources Specialist - Forestry (1) 1.00 1.00 Spec I Forestry (1) 1.00 1.00 Spec I Nursery Operations (1) 1.00 1.00 Spec I Nursery Propagation (1) 1.00 1.00 Technicians (4) 4.00 4.00 Nursery Workers (4) 3.52 3.52 Senior Manager for Wildlife (1) 1.00 1.00 Natural Resources Specialist - Wildlife (2) 2.00 2.00 Natural Resources Technician - Wildlife (1) 0.80 0.80 Specialist I- Wildlife (1) 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager for Water Resources (1) 1.00 1.00 Natural Resources Specialist -Water Resources (2) 2.00 2.00 Natural Resources Technician -Water Resources (2) 2.00 2.00 Secretary 1 1.00 1.00 Director of Public Safety (1) 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Public Safety Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Park Police Lieutenant (1) 1.00 1.00 Investigator (1) 1.00 1.00 Sergeant (4) 3.75 3.75 Police Officers (20) 20.00 20.00 Park Service Officer Supervisor (1) 1.00 1.00 Park Service Officers (14) 15.00 15.00 Equine Worker (1) 0.75 0.75 Clerk Typist 1 0.50 0.50 Total - Regular Full Time Equivalent Positions 157.12 157.12 Total - Temporary/ lEntermlittent Hours 75,101 75,101 Note: Positions shown are for the General Fund Operating Budget Only. Some positions may be funded by other sources or split between the General Fund Operating Budget and other budgets. -14- 2011 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIO Full -Time E uivalents 2010 2011 Positions Associate Superintendent for Administration (1) 1.00 1.00 Fundraising and Development Manager (1) 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Secretary (1) 1.00 1.00 Intergovernmental Media Relations Coordinator (1) 1.00 1.00 Public Affairs Coordinator 1 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager- Research and Evaluation (1) 1.00 1.00 Research Technician 2 2.00 2.00 Director of Marketing and Communications 1.00 1.00 Communications Manager (2) 2.00 2.00 Senior Graphic Designer (1) 1.00 1.00 Graphic Designer (1) 1.00 1.00 Photographer -(1) 1.00 1.00 Web Specialist (1) 1.00 1.00 Public Relations Copywriter (1) 1.00 1.00 Copy Writer (1) 1.00 1.00 Marketing and Communication Assistant (1) 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant 1 1.00 1.00 Director of Human Resources 1.00 1.00 Senior Human Resources Generalist (1) 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Generalist (1) 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Assistant (2) 2.00 2.00 Human Resources Specialist (1) 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Receptionist/Secretary ( 1 1.00 1.00 Director of Information Technology (1) 1.00 1.00 System Program Analyst (1) 1:00 1.00 Computer Network Manager (1) _ 1.00 1.00 Computer Network Technician (1) 1.00 1.00 Computer Operator (1) 1.00 1.00 Computer Help Desk /Trainer (1) 1.00 1.00 Computer Technician (1) 1.00 1.00 Clerk Typist 1 0.50 0.50 Total - Regular Full Time Equivalent Positions 34.50 34.50 Total - Temporary/Intermittent Hours 3 041 3,041 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2010 OPERATING BUDGET Total - Regular Full Time Equivalent Positions 321.63 321.73 Total - Temporary/Intermittent Hours 201,209 206,475 Note: Positions shown are for the General Fund Operating Budget Only. Some positions may be funded by other sources or split between the General Fund Operating Budget and other budgets. - 15 - ra o e �y December 3,2b`10 City of Edina Mr. Thomas Raeuchle 4634 Bruce Avenue Edina, M,N 55424 RE: Special' Assessment Notice City Improvement Number A -213' Dear Mr. Raeuchle: Thank you for your email regarding your assessment notice and the incorrect Sample 10- year Repayment Calculation spreadsheet. We understand your concern regarding the accuracy of the numbers based on this experience with the City. I can assure you that the proposed assessment amount is correct and has been checked and rechecked a number of times by both City Staff and our consultant for the project. Attached you will find a corrected Proposed Assessment Sheet with the corrected recalculation spreadsheet. The Proposed. Assessment Statement is a new service that City staff provided, to show residents what their repayment might be if they wish to spread it over 10- years. The repayment schedule was not updated from a previous iteration of the spreadsheet and should have been. City staff processed twice the amount of special assessment notices this past season; 938 special assessment notices with 11 different repayment calculations. However, this does not excuse us' from a mistake- of this type. I, assure you that our quality assurance. is typically top notch and staff is making changes to our system so this. type of error will not occur in, the future. If you have any questions or' need. additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or .:at whoule @ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, .OUA_q X44.'e-t Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosures C: Scott Neal - City Manager City Council and Mayor e e ra1\t5 Wreelsv5ruce venue ina TO 46.34 Bruce Avenue re assessments.clocR City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 wwwxityofedinaxom TTY 952- 826 -0379 Y16 tp?81 - City of Edina Assessing Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0365 �a�scu'_:'s z:c�.:v �xW'.. `xJ�!C�sJ'.:••"U��'!.'��L:Y�<?r <_.:..��k..�+95iE�'.L"e�•L<��,! _ Y; P • • , STATEMENT E ,DINA COUNTR;; NEIGHBORHbOD REC.ONSTRUCTfO'N� r a M ONTR,ACT NO. ENG' 08- ,-fir yp ment 'No. A -213 THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL - PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: 1802824130057 TAXPAYER (S): EDITH BURNIER & THOMAS RAEUCHLE YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ 11,468.98 RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 5. 2010 Total Assessment: $11,468.98 Interest Rate: 5.75% Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Remain ing Principal 2010 $ 164.87 1 2011 $ 1,146.90 $ 659.47 $ 1,971.23 $ 10, 322.08 2 2012 $ 1,146.90 $ 593.52 $ 1,740.42 $ 9,175.18 3 2013 $ 1,146.90 $ 527.57 $ 1,674.47 $ 8,028.29 4 2014 $ 1,146.90 $ 461.63 $ 1,608.52 $ 6,881.39 5 2015 $ 1,146.90 $ 395.68 $ 1,542.58 $ 5,734.49 6 2016 $ 1,146.90 $ 329.73 $ 1,476.63 $ 4,587.59 7 2017 $ 1,146.90 $ 263.79 $ 1,410.68 $ 3,440.69 8 2018 $ 1,146.90 $ 197.84 $ 1,344.74 $ 2,293.80 9 2019 $ 1,146.90 $ 131.89 $ 1,278.79 $ 1,146.90 10 2020 $ 1,146.90 $ 65.95 $ 1,212.84 $ - $ 11,468.98 $ 3,791.93 $ 15,260.91 I City of -Edina Assessing - Department 4801 West:50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952- 826 -0365 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STATEMENT THIS IS YOUR ONLY BILL — PLEASE PAY AFTER OCTOBER 5 - FINAL DUE DATE IS NOVEMBER 30 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGES Property ID Number: TAXPAYER (S): YOUR TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ 11,468.98 RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT Sample 10 -year Re- payment Calculation based upon adoption October 5. 2010 Total Assessment: $11,468.98 Interest Rate: 5.75% Payment Year Principal Amount Interest Amount Payment Amount Remaining Principal 2010 $ 174.25 1 2011 $ 1,181.37 $ 697.01 $ 2,052.63 $ 10,632.31 2 2012 $ 1,181.37 $ 627.31 $ 1,808.67 $ 9,450.94 3 2013 $ 1,181.37 $ 557.61 $ 1,738.97 $ 8,269.58 4 2014 $ 1,181.37 $ 487. $ 1,669.27 $ 7,088.21 5 2015 $ 1,181.37 $ $ 1,599.57 $ 5,906.84 6 2016 $ 1,181.37 8.50 $ 1,529.87 $ 4,725.47 7 2017 $ 1,18 3 $ 278.80 $ 1,460.17 $ 3,544.10 8 2018 $ P,pj.gf $ 209.10 $ 1,390.47 $ 2,362:74 9 2019 $ 4,181.37 $ 139.40 $ 1,320.77 $ 1,181.37 10 2020 $ 1,181.37 $ 69.70 $ 1,251.07 $ (0.00) $ 11,813.68 $ 4,007.79 $ 15,821.47 ,1� O e �y O REPORPRECOIV MEN®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. -1 DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: DECEMBER 7, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. auk--, DEC 0 7 2U`eG < cky id 7A&LQ �1Z-0 7 7b U Lk III M-11�11�. TV UA� � op r j A AAA l/ X i, n n OJ rl M �► r a A a'.,i /h� -t./ I�IYt� t Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:56 PM To: John Keprios r-.-, F -• _ , , p Cc: Susan Howl_ *- • ti '- a' Subject: FW: Vote Yes for the Edina Blke Trail DEC 0 7 N10 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Mark Guettler [ mailto:mark_guettler @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:55 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Vote Yes for the Edina BIke Trail Council Members: Please vote YES for the future health and safety of Edina Residents by voting in favor of the proposed bike trail through Edina and along 9 MIle Creek. This would be a positive development for families and enhance the ability for all citizens to get out and ride bikes. Regards, Mark Guettler Susan Howl `tECr�.i Subject: Proposed Bike Trail CSC, U 7 'LUII) I am a homeowner who lives at The Heatherton condominium located at 4120 Parklawn Avenue, which is on the proposed bike trail — sections 19 -1, 19 -2, and 19 -3. Here are my concerns about the proposed trail on the streets that border The Heatherton building. Buses — school and public: this is a high density residential area with many school age children who attend school almost year round. Many of these kids are from other countries and they need additional schooling . during the summer. Have you checked with the Edina Public Schools to know their bus routes, the time schedule and how many riders each bus stop handles? We are also on a public bus route with a variety of express and regular bus stops on Gallagher and Parklawn. Have you checked with the bus company to learn about their schedule and the number of riders in this area? Fire hydrants are mostly on the 19 -1 and 19 -2 side. If the bike path goes in on this portion of the plan, has the expense of switching the hydrants to the opposite side of the street been considered? Lawn sprinkler systems — will the building owners be responsible for moving inground sprinklers that could be in the way of the widened bike path? The sidewalks on the north side of Parklawn and east side of Gallagher are right against the street — we don't have a grassy boulevard separating the street from the sidewalk. Will some of our private property be taken for the bike path? The buildings on both sides of Gallagher and even some buildings on Parklawn are already rather close to the sidewalk. Any further loss of land for the path will result in traffic (and its noise) being ever closer to residences. The suggestion of a "fence to preserve privacy" in the June 2010 letter from Three Rivers doesn't say how tall these fences would be ... not so sure fences would look very good in our neighborhood. On the Gallagher side, The Heatherton doesn't have room for a fence, landscaping to hide the fence, and off - street parking. Multi -use of trail for walkers, etc. — does this mean that we lose our sidewalks and now we have to walk on the proposed trail for 19 -1, 19 -2, 19 -3 along with the bikers and skateboarders? My building's two main entrances are on Parklawn — it's our "front door" with the security system. Most of our visitors park on the north side of Parklawn. If we lose parking on that side of the street, our visitors will have a longer walk to reach our building and have to cross the street in the middle of the block. Heritage trees: some are already rather close to the street and sidewalk — if the trail goes in and the road /sidewalk width is widened, we could damage the root system and /or these roots could cause the road /path to buckle. Whole Foods will be building their new store at the southeast corner of France and Parklawn. There will be an increase in car and truck traffic in this area. It is possible that the truckers making deliveries to Whole Foods could use the Section 19 area as their route from Highway 100 to France Avenue. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED Route 19 continuing east on 76th /77th Street to link up to Centennial Lakes at the south end of the lake? There are no residential buildings on that route and mostly businesses that only have an increase of traffic at the start and end of their business day. Linda L. Van Blarcom Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Development From: Jim Peterson [mailto:jjpeterson42 @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 1:14 PM To: Lynette Biunno t Subject: Nine Mile Creek Development QED U 7 'i�'� To The City Council, I have had many feelings about the proposed bike path between the back of our property on Creek Drive and the Creek. Twenty five years ago when I inquired of the Nine Mile creek Watershed District they said that a walking path would be developed along the creek some day and so that was what I have been expecting to happen "some day." Now that plan is a 12 foot wide bike path to satisfy a special interest group in Edina, not a lazy 3 -4 foot walking path that everyone could enjoy, whether their property abutted the creek or they lived several blocks away. Today, young boys and girls can step out of their back yards and drop a line into the creek whenever they choose but when the raised structure is built no one of any age will be able to approach the creek on the east or north side for nearly a mile. That of course also includes the wild life that currently wanders through the back yards and along the creek. I am being inundated with requests for donations for the poor and hungry of our suburb, and surrounding suburbs, and I think it's unconscionable that we are considering authorizing the expenditure of $20 to $30 million for this development during these trying times. No matter where the money is coming from, and how many different funds will cooperate, the money is still coming from your pocketbook and my pocketbook, and I've got far better places to give my money than into the creek -side bike path. Thanks for your understanding, Jim and Julie Peterson 6520 Creek Drive Edina, 55439 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please vote for the creek route Subject: Please vote for the creek route DEC 0 7 1010 To The Edina Mayor and City Council: I strongly support the creek based route for the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. A trail along the creek is much more scenic and safer, and will be a great addition to the recreational opportunities in Edina. It's also good for people who never bike, since bikes on streets slow down traffic and cause traffic jams. In closing, I urge you to vote for the creek based route of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail this evening. Thank you, Joan Strickler 6204 South Knoll Dr. Edina, MN USA Tel +1 952 238 9822 ioan.stricklerAdialoa.com Susan Howl Subject: FW: bike trail comments t.. r From: McFarlane, Barb [mailto: Barb. McFa rlane@CO. DAKOTA. M N. US] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:28 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: bike trail comments I support the plans for an Edina trail. I run and bike on trails throughout the metro area, specifically Hopkins, Minnetonka, Wayzata and west, and realize homeowners have concerns about a trail in their backyards. It has been my experience on these trails, that there is a buffer of landscaping that provides privacy. I would hope this would be a part of any trail plans for Edina's affected homeowners. The trails have always felt safe to me, and I'm not aware that crime has increased in these areas. Barb McFarlane 7615 Edinborough Way Edina, MN 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support of Bike Trail -- -. Subject: Support of Bike Trail CIty Council Members: I am unable to attend tonight's meeting but want to voice my support for the Three Rivers bike trail as it is planned. I feel that this trail will improve the recreational lifestyle for the residents of Edina, enabling us to easily link in to the network of trails throughout the metro. As we become more aware of how physical activity impacts overall good health, it is important to facilitate enjoyable activities for our citizens. I also feel that the environmental impact may be a positive one, as this area will now be managed more actively. In addition, the ability of people to enjoy the area will likely create awareness of the importance of keeping it healthy. Finally, I like the idea that the monies Edina has been contributing to Three Rivers would finally result in a tangible asset for our community. I feel that the process has been thorough and transparent, and I would like to commend all involved with it. I hope that the City Council will approve the trail at the meeting tonight. Thank you all for your service to the city. Laura Nisi lnisiRmac.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 3:55 PM ro: John Keprios - :c: Susan Howl v Subject: FW: Against 9 Mile Creek Trail Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist $ 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I;, � 7;'� IbiunnoAci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com f ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ann Cordes [mailto:mariesiemn @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:42 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Against 9 Mile Creek Trail Dear Sir or Madam, I am totally against the insanity of spending millions of dollars for a trail that will continue to be a maintenance budget buster. I doubt that this email will do any good. It seems like the bigger the price tag the more that Edina wants whatever it is. The latest toy. When I go to city hall and see the waste and the waste of a fire station for the love of one bathroom, it makes me sick. Not to mention that the people in city hall do nothing to stop spending like crazy and tax us to death. Property values have gone down but we keep paying more, because you folks keep spending. It is very disheartening and makes the rest of us feel helpless. Sincerely, Ann Marie Cordes Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno - -• Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 11:09 AM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Trail Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 t� J Ibiunno(&ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ��!;• ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: LOIS RING [mailto:llydesigns @msn.com] . Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 10:42 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Nine Mile Creek Trail Edina City Council I am in favor of the Nine Mile Creek Trail development. It is time for Edina to join in becoming more connected in other ways than automobile. I am also in favor of Edina becoming more pedestrian friendly. Lois Ring 7440 Edinborough Way Edina MN 55435 i ALAN R. HOHENSTEIN 5104 W. 70`h Street Edina, MN 55439 952 - 583 -8796 E -mail alanhohensteinnhotmail.com J December 5, 2010 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN Re: 9 Mile Creek Bike Path Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I have been an avid cyclist for over 50 years. When by sons were younger we were a member of a Saturday morning riding club. Our rides included the twenty mile Cannon River trail, St. Paul's Summit Avenue, twenty - five mile ride to Watertown and many others. Since then my favorite ride is five times around Lake Harriet for a total of fifteen miles. Getting to and from Lake Harriet involves riding on city side streets, France Avenue, 50th Street and Penn Ave. Riding this route to and from Lake Harriet is a harrowing experience. While riding at a respectable 15 mph next to cars at speeds between 30 & 40 mph one takes one's life in their hands. Last summer a cyclist in the bike lane and a car in the right were stopped at a red light waiting for it to turn. When the light turned green the cyclist proceeded straight ahead while the car made a right hand turn hitting the cyclist. The cyclist was hospitalized and eventually died. The question of who had the right -of -way was not answered. Cyclists riding in the marked parking zone frequently encounter a vehicle in the zone requiring the cyclist to turn to the left and into the car lane which is an obvious safety hazard. For these two reasons and others I ride on bike paths only. The Three Rivers Park District is in favor of an elevated bike path through Nine Mile Creek in Edina. The District has not specified the length of the path but suggest that it could be eight miles or more. The bike path around Lake Harriet is eight miles; Lake Calhoun is eight and one -half miles with a connecting city street of one -half miles for a total of nine miles. These distances are approximate but reasonable close and closely replicate the proposed length of the elevated path through Nine Mile Creek. Imagine for a moment that the nine miles around the two lakes were elevated eight feet with four foot walls of wood or fence on both sides and entrances only at each end. Once on the bike path the rider or riders are essentially trapped and unable to escape except to climb one of the four foot sidewalls and jump twelve feet to the ground below. Riders have been attached at least twice exiting the tunnel on the Cedar Lake Trail and another was mugged on the Greenway Trail at gun point sending him to the hospital. With a history of potential violence would you encourage anyone, male or female to ride an eight mile TROUGH with no chance of escape? Would you permit your daughter to ride alone in the TROUGH? Would you take your family, your children and grandchildren for a ride on the TROUGH? I certainly wouldn't and I don't think you would either. A month or so ago a man representing Three Rivers Park District stated that if Edina rejects a bike path through our city Hopkins cyclists will develop their own path to Richfield. Hopkins path has been completed for years and those wanting to go to Richfield have already established an Edina route. Some cyclists and cycle groups have voiced support for an elevated path through Nine Mile Creek stating that it avoids riding up a hill on Gleason Road and riding on city streets. An elevated bike path would exit at 70th Street onto a city street shared with 30,000 vehicles that use it each day. Thus the Creek path- does not eliminate riding on a city street. As for hills, many bike paths throughout the State have hills. It.is just a part of riding. Some support using Three Rivers Park money in Edina because it is about time that Edina benefited from the $3 plus millions that Edina contributes each year. Three Rivers Parks District in enormous ranging from above Coon Rapids to the north to beyond Bloomington to the south. This large Park contains lakes, bike paths, play grounds, picnic grounds and other activities for the enjoyment of a large population including Edina. A bike path through Edina has an unspecified cost that reportedly could reach $20 million or more, would be closed in the winter and policed and maintain during the summer by Edina. How many of the 45,000 or more Edina residents are cyclists and how many of those will choose to ride the TROUGH. I have not seen a number of Edina cyclists but it is my opinion that it is about 1,500 with only a few in my opinion willing to hazard the TROUGH. I would not use a bike path through Edina and believe Edina should reject any path. However if council endorses a path selecting the Nine Mile Creek route only to connect with a road route at each end does not seem logical. In summary, I am opposed to a path through Edina and specifically through the Nine Mile Creek Park for the following reasons: 1. Sharing roads with cars is a serious safety issue. 2. An elevated path through Nine Mile Creek is a personal safety issue, usable only in the summer and must be policed and maintained at Edina's expense. 3. Few Edina residents are cyclists. 4. Edina's contribution to Three Rivers Park District is an enormous benefit both to Edina residents and the general public at large. 5. Edina is a community of leaders not followers. Hopkins and Richfield have made their decision which is not compelling Edina to follow suit. If Edina does not benefit the city is not compelled to accommodate Hopkins and Richfield. 6. Many prior mayors and civic leaders have voiced their objection to a bike path through NINE MILE CREEK. 7. Parks, golf courses and community centers have been named after Edina's civic leaders. If I were a civic one of them I would not my name attached to a multi -mile TROUGH through NINE MILE CREEK or have it as my legacy. Respectfully, Alan R. Hohenstein Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 9:16 AM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: No to the nine mile trail through the Preserve and Walnut Park Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. J , Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ` Ibiunnonci.edina.mmus I www.CityofEdina.com J ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Bonnie J. Scott [mailto:bsnanatoo @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 12 :22 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: No to the nine mile trail through the Preserve and Walnut Park Please listen to us. No trail through Edina. 1 (1 . Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike Trail --------- jpi From: Jan Nolander [mailto:jnolander @hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 7:49 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Bike Trail City Council Members, I know there has been a lot of noise about the bike trail and a lot of opposition. The fact is that Edina needs a bike trail. It is embarrassing that we lag the rest of the metro area in this regard. Please approve the current design so that construction can begin promptly. Thank you for your consideration. Jan Nolander 5333 Whiting Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:51 AM To: John Keprios "' t Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunnoi Susan Howl From: tracyaearl @aol.com [mailto:tracyaearl @aol.com] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:39 PM C 7 Lfv i� To: Lynette Biunno Subject: 9 mile creek trail As a long time resident of Edina (my family has owned my house since 1963), 1 strongly oppose the creation of a bike trail along the 9 mile creek. I feel that this would necessarily disrupt the ecosystem that we have tried for decades to preserve. I also think that the trail will bring an unnecessary element of noise, traffic and litter to the land /yards surrounding the trail. There are plenty of trails in the twin cities, and instituting another one that disrupts the lives of the people and animals that live in the area is unnecesary. If the city council members actually lived along the creek, I'm sure they would not want this either. Tracy Earl 1 Susan Howl Edina City Council Members City of Edina 4801 West 50th Streety:r s Edina, MN 5424 EEO U 7 200 Dear Council Members, My husband and I have been property owners in Edina since 1954. We have always been proud of the efficient management of our village and city. Our present home abuts Nine Mile Creek but presently the latest bike path plan does not go through our yard. However, we are strongly opposed to the bike path proposed that does follow the creek, destroying many trees, natural habitat and through wetlands. Why do lake cabin property owners take their docks out of the lake in the fall? Just because they like the extra work? No, it is because when the ice melts in the spring, the ice often does not just sink. But rather, it pushes and moves what ever structure that was in the water before it froze. The ice has tremendous force, it expands, pushes and bends wood and even metal. So a dock goes into the lake in the spring and out in the fall. The proposed bike path along the creek, has numerous boardwalks over and in the wetlands. We feel these could be destroyed each spring just like a lake dock. This would be a large expense to rebuild and or repair. The Edina Park Board commissioners voted in favor of the Creek route. Perhaps they did not realize all of its ramifications. Edina would be giving Three Rivers Park District a permanent lease of 40 acres of Edina Park Land. Edina citizens stand to gain the least from an elevated trail. Access points will be at either end of the city and limited within city limits. The raised 12 foot wide wooden broadwalk in many places would be built in a 100 year flood plain. Maintenance and use during winter months falls directly to Edina Citizens. Environmental assessments were vague and did not include many factors of an elevated boardwalk. We feel the Edina's Park Board Members voted by the encouragement of the Edina Park Board Director, John Keprios, without the knowledge of all of the facts. The results of the survey that you received earlier, fall 2010 was of petitions received only during a one month period in early summer. The many petitions submitted earlier, fall 2009 and winter 2010 were not included, seemingly ignored. Please vote against routing the Edina Regional Bike Trail along Nine Mile Creek. Sincerely, Mary A. Ryan 6824 Brook Drive Edina, MN 55439 1 mMryan q.com Susan Howl Subject: concern about 70th St. near Cornelia school ' Dear Edina City Council, My name is Emily Boettge and .1 live at 6816 Oaklawn Ave. in Edina. I am writing because I am very concerned about the speed of the traffic near Cornelia Elementary School on 70th St. My second grader began attending Cornelia Elementary School this fall. We love the school and we love walking to school, but as a parent I am very concerned about my child crossing 701h St. at the Cornelia Dr. intersection. The traffic is very, very fast on 70th St. at all times of day. I do see that there are school -speed limit signs posted along 70th St. and I also see that they are completely ignored daily by the majority of the traffic. Today, I saw a truck going about 50 miles an hour trying to get through a yellow light right where kids were crossing. These are speeds that if a child got hit, they wouldn't get a minor injury- -they would get killed or maimed for life —they would get squashed like a grape. Since we began going to school in September, I have walked my, child to and from school every single day. I have seen Edina Police cars patrolling only twice and I have never seen one car stopped for violating the school -speed limit. Meanwhile, I see a multitude of Edina Police officers patrolling and /or stopping cars at 68th and Valley View Road, on Hwys 62 and 100, at France Ave, etc. This is great, but these aren't areas where large numbers of kids are walking attempting to get to school. I know that the police are out and making traffic stops, but there seems to be a noticeable lack of enforcement around the school zones. I have lived in NY, Los Angeles, Rochester, Duluth, Michigan and multiple cities in Wisconsin as well as the South Minneapolis area. Unfortunately, Edina stands out as the most dangerous and stressful place I have ever attempted to be a pedestrian. I have been reading in the Star Tribune and the Edina Sun Current about Edina Police departments' efforts to send a message by cracking down on traffic violations in Edina. I applaud their efforts to make Edina safe, but I believe that there is a striking lack of concern for our most vulnerable citizens: children walking to school. Yesterday, I had to take one of my children to an appointment near Children's hospital in Minneapolis. I couldn't find anyone to walk my younger son home, so I pulled him out of school two hours early rather than risk having him walk home alone across 70th St. Furthermore, as a runner, I am out in Edina every single day trying to cross the streets in the cross walks. Very often a car traveling in one direction will stop for me and the car going in the other direction won't. This is very noticeable at 70th St. and also 66th St. near the Edina pool; which are two areas where children frequently cross, attempting to get to school and /or to the pool /park. These are difficult areas for me as a 40- year -old woman and children are not as adept at recognizing the dangers of traffic. Is there anything we can do to remedy this dangerous situation? We have a great {police department here in Edina. They are out and about --I see them! But people are getting away with extremely dangerous driving around our schools and that really scares me as a parent. It's a real problem; a dangerous problem that really reduces the quality of life in Edina. When I have guests visit from other parts of the country, they always comment on the speed of the traffic around school zones and the way that cars don't have to stop and wait for children to cross the street after getting off buses. It is kind of embarrassing, but worst of all, it is really dangerous. I think we can do better in Edina, but we need the help of our police department. Thanks, Emily Boettge (952) 922 -4925 Susan Howl Mayor James Hovland Council Members: Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Scot Housh Ann Swenson The Mayor cites the survey that Edina residents want more bike paths. Let us say they want more trees. We will then plant a tree in each of your living rooms. Do you find this intrusive? Will the City Council and Three Rivers guarantee no new taxes will be raised for the bike path in any of the upcoming years? Will our property values be lowered because of the proximity to the bike path? We have a bureaucrat's dream which will become a Oresident's nightmare. The issue is not about a bike path but whether this bike path will adversely affect the quality of life for the residents? The residents of the affected area should have their day in court with the City Council before a vote is taken. An answer would be appreciated since I cannot attend the December 7th meeting because of a conflict. Sincerely, Lev Mailer 6875 Langford Drive Edina 952 - 930 -0636 levmeister@hotmail.com RE7 DEC 0 1010 cc: John Pope, President Londonderry Homeowners Association Paul Hauge, President Edina West Homeowners Association Shelly Golden, President Manor Homes Association Bob Schwartzbauer, President Habitat Court �1 o� e \�roRPORP`9� 1888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VII. B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® ❑ ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Receive Petition Requesting Minnehaha Creek Fence Along West Side of France Avenue over ACTION REQUESTED: Receive petition and refer to Engineering for processing. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: November 1, 2010, a petition was received from David Clark requesting the installation of a fence along the west side of France Avenue South over Minnehaha Creek. Five residents living from Woodland Circle and France Avenue have signed the petition. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. ATTACHMENT: Petition from David Clark ON, SEAL)- "I Aug 14 10 12:48p David Clark 952.92 .44MV —1 2010 A. City of Edina, Minnesota o CITY cOUNCn. N CIT crrW West 50 Street • Edina, Minnesots 55424 (952) 927 -8561 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN SIDEWALK ❑ STREET LIGHTING STORM SEWER ❑ C] SANITARY SEWER STREET NJ OTHER: ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ SURFACING TH we* --1 4s CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ersons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the Th e p locations listed below. �1 AA c SoaYh WeSE Si� •I G26 Fr�h�e a►a `t between ADDRESS ADDRESS �ranLc l� NAB t.00AMON OF piO'ROVEh F SY STREEr between and ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OE 7MPROVF.MSNTBY S7R6ST NAME and between D ADDRESS ADRESS LOCATION OFIMPROVE11ffNrSYSPREEI1VANlE between - ---- and ADDRESS LOCATION OF OWROvsmz" i n a ..-- - - -- - IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS SST HAVE S SIGNED OF THESE�IMPROVEMENTS ��ST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS T� IMPROVEMENT S IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED THE PROPERTIES S AUTHORIZED GY CHAPTER 4 9- MINNESOTA STATUTES. BY THE COUNCIL AS OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS TURF {PRINTED) (PWMD) ,JC.Ytc` C'a'ts r - - �/ V�ce�rf s-' es 97 6✓aoa/l�� 7rI�%ao'° Thl ' on was eirculated by: vie-1n tt 5 C"' -& ka„ Je C`c r �• ADDRESS NAME 552_- 929 -44-4 I PHQNE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2000 Aug 31 10 11:19p David Clark 952.929.4470 p.1 August 31, 2010 95 Woodland Circle Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 On behalf of the parties signing this petition, I would like to formally request the City of Edina install cost - effective fencing along the west side of France Avenue South over Minnehaha Creek (approximately 300 feet). The fence is needed to reduce the traffic visibility and noise pollution for the residents living in close proximity to the west side of France Avenue along Minnehaha Creek. There is unanimous agreement among the families living near this area that the visible traffic along France Avenue is a significant intrusion, and we believe that a simple fence could significantly reduce traffic visibility and noise, particularly in the winter months when the view is unobstructed from our homes. We would like the city to take quick action on this small request that will have a large positive impact on our neighborhood. Thank You, David rlarlc S�'�' mLo! �ro�g i REPORURECOM M EN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. From: Susan Howl Human Services Coordinator 13 Action F-1 Discussion F"*7 Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: HRRC PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENT. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Human Rights & Relations Commission was asked to make an adjustment in its 2011 proposed human services budget to allow for a proposed increase to the 2011 Edina Resource Center budget. In order to accomplish this request, a pro rata decrease in the amount of $1316 was applied to each of the eight professional services providers' proposed amounts for 2011 funding. As a result, the $1316 would be added to the 2011 funding proposal for the Resource Center. The adjustment is outlined on the back of this page. Name Pro Rata Decrease ($1316) Adjusted 2011 2011 Prop. 2010 Senior Community Serv. 30% of total = $395 decrease = new amount $23,605 23,605 24,000 24,120 Cornerstone 19% of total = $250 decrease = new amount $14,750 14,750 15,000 15,098 VEAP 27% of total = $355 decrease = new amount $21,645 21,645 22,000 21,204 The Bridge 6% of total = $79 decrease = new amount $4,921 4,921 5,000 4,824 Conflict Resolution Ctr. 4% of total = $53 decrease = new amount $2,947 2,947 3,000 2,322 Store To Door 6% of total = $79 decrease = new amount $4,921 4,921 5,000 6,732 Tubman 1% of total = $13 decrease = new amount $987 987 1,000 1,908 Edina School Readiness 7% of total = $92 decrease = new amount $5,908 5,908 6,000 1,458 Normandale Center 3,366 TOTALS 79,684 81,000 81,032 RPC Edina Resource Center Pro Rata decrease (1316) covers the Resource Center increase. 38,316 37,000 37,000 (2) Supervalu (2) Prime Therapeutics International Dairy Queen Polar Semiconductor Universal Acceptance Corporation /CarHop SRF Consulting Group Mid- America Real Estate - Windsor Plaza Commute Information Requests: 384 Rideshare to Work Month pledges: 455 Zip Code Map: 1 494 Commuter Services Executive Director's Report .November 2010 Empioyer Outreach Commuter-Fairs (13) eWorkPlace 8 (2) Prime Therapeutics Supervalu (2) Best Buy call center Polar Semiconductor Best Buy SRF Consulting Group ATK ShopNBC Syngenta Seeds ingenix Supervalu United Health Group US Bank MSP Airport for HMS Host and Delta Northwestern Health Sciences University Midwest Medical Insurance Company (MMIC) Western National Insurance Company RSM McGladrey TempForce efairs (9) Best Buy Meetings with Allies: Syngenta Seeds Met Council to revise 2011 budget format ` Prime Therapeutics Commuter Choice Awards planning meeting 1 Ingenix 2011 Commuter Challenge planning meeting Supervalu TDM Consultants /E.D. meetings United Health Group eWorkPlace project management team mtg. US Bank Misc. Outreach: Windsor Plaza . Provided 30 preferential carpool parking signs to US Bank in Richfield ATK Heavily assisting US Bank move 1,200 people from St. Paul to Richfield Heavily assisting Prime Therapeutics move 300 employees from Eagan to Bloomington Working with SouthWest Transit on starting a suburb to suburb demonstration route to the Golden Triangle Saved a vanpool at Best Buy from disbanding Interviewed by consultant for/City of Minnetonka regarding their transit service Scheduled eWorkPlace employer briefing on Telework - the ROI, includes employer panel Met with social media consultant to plan expanding Twitter presence Met with StarTribune.com for online advertising rates for 2011 Coordinated and staffed the 2010 regional Commuter Choice Awards Designed several new logo concepts for Commuter Services Updated website, 494 Facebook page General Fund - Mostly short term investments maturing 1 to 6 months. Cable - Communications investments held in a longer -term managed fund. Construction - Approximately two thirds of the investments are for the Construction Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund most of which will mature within a year. The other approximately third of investments are public works facility bonds proceeds and will be spent within the next several months. This category also includes smaller investments for Golf Course Memorial fund, E911, Public Safety Training Facility, and 1494 Corridor Commission. Edinborough - Investments for the operation of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes held in a longer -term managed fund. Utility Funds - Investments for the Utility funds (water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling) as well as the remaining bond proceeds from the last issue which will be spent over the next several months. Debt Service funds - Debt service funds for various bond issues,reserve fund for gymnasium bonds, street reconstruction special assessment prepayments. Investments include a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longe -term managed fund. Arena Fund - Bond proceeds original investments maturing between 5 and 9 months. HRA Fund - Funds held for HRA projects and debt service. Includes a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longer -term managed fund. Prepared by John Wallin 11/8/2010 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA INVESTMENT BALANCE BY FUND BY MONTH NINE MONTHS ENDED 9/30/10 GENERAL CABLE CONSTRCTN EDINB /CL UTILITY DEBT ARENA HRA TOTAL JANUARY 10,397,761 701,111 20,136,794 3,047,901 10,791,652 4,974,423 2,425,996 10,391,685 62,867,323 FEBRUARY 8,209,736 704,488 18,991,324 3,062,580 8,246,492 2,324,886 2,426,280 10,285,802 54,251,588 MARCH 6,873,956 704,921 16,854,499 3,064,466 8,746,632 2,020,201 2,427,178 10,058,353 50,750,206 APRIL 5,874,046 706,719 16,081,711 3,072,281 9,698,877 2,021,504 2,216,202 10,094,605 49,765,945 MAY 4,816,655 711,247 10,988,436 3,091,964 9,145,174 1,832,802 2,216,475 9,923,123 42,725,876 JUNE 12,198,559 713,219 10,856,920 3,100,538 9,010,107 1,889,231 1,227,302 10,333,959 49,329,835 JULY 13,232,408 715,441 10,822,429 3,110,196 8,812,173 4,033,842 983,013 12,326,044 54,035,546 AUGUST 9,857,628 721,782 10,313,703 3,137,763 9,556,025 3,228,438 837,511 11,839,767 49,492,617 SEPTEMBER 7,843,451 724,885 9,098,826 3,151,254 9,825,369 3,324,086 837,803 11,716,053 46,521,727 OCTOBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOVEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DECEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9 MONTHS 79,304,200 6,403,813 124,144,642 27,838,943 83,832,501 25,649,413 15,597,760 96,969,391 459,740,663 AVG 9 MONTHS 8,811,578 711,535 13,793,849 3,093,216 9,314,722 2,849,935 1,733,084 10,774,377 51,082,296 9 MONTH GAIN 68,299 26,241 73,769 114,076 56,249 26,201 3,830 140,409 509,074 9 MONTH ROR (annualized) 1.033 4.917 0.713 4.917 0.805 1.226 0.295 1.738 1.329 Current yields A encies ( Brokered CDs As of October 4, 2010 Maturity Yield Maturity Yield Maturity Yield 3 months 0.10 3 months 0.10 3 months 0.20 6 months 0.13 6 months 0.10 6 months 0.25 9 months 0.14 9 months 0.11 9 months 0.30 1 year 0.18 1 year 0.23 1 year 0.40 2 years 0.35 2 years 0.37 2 years 0.65 3 years 0.68 3 years 0.80 3 years 120 5 years 1.17 5 years 1.40 10 years 2.49 10 years 2-80 General Fund - Mostly short term investments maturing 1 to 6 months. Cable - Communications investments held in a longer -term managed fund. Construction - Approximately two thirds of the investments are for the Construction Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund most of which will mature within a year. The other approximately third of investments are public works facility bonds proceeds and will be spent within the next several months. This category also includes smaller investments for Golf Course Memorial fund, E911, Public Safety Training Facility, and 1494 Corridor Commission. Edinborough - Investments for the operation of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes held in a longer -term managed fund. Utility Funds - Investments for the Utility funds (water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling) as well as the remaining bond proceeds from the last issue which will be spent over the next several months. Debt Service funds - Debt service funds for various bond issues,reserve fund for gymnasium bonds, street reconstruction special assessment prepayments. Investments include a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longe -term managed fund. Arena Fund - Bond proceeds original investments maturing between 5 and 9 months. HRA Fund - Funds held for HRA projects and debt service. Includes a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longer -term managed fund. Prepared by John Wallin 11/8/2010 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund - Revenues Quarterly Financial Update Seatember 2010 General Fund revenues total $15,374,862 through September 30, 2010. This amount represents 57% of total budgeted revenues for all of 2010, which is a significant increase compared to 52% a year ago. The improved performance comes from a combination of higher revenues and lower budgetary expectations for 2010. The City received our first advance property tax payment of the year from Hennepin County in June and a subsequent supplemental payment in early July. These two payments were a positive surprise as they came in close to 99% of the levied amount, versus the budgeted a collection percentage of 97% for the year. License and permit revenue increased by $227,582 from last year and are on track to meet or even exceed the significantly reduced budget we set for this category in 2010. General Fund — Expenditures Total General Fund expenditures are 71 % of budget so far this year compared with 70% a year ago. With a large percentage of our General Fund budget tied to salaries and benefits, it is common for our expenditures to be very consistent throughout the year, meaning that most years we use about 25% of our budget every quarter. A breakdown of expenditures by department follows. General government expenditures are 72% of budget so far this year, which up from 64% through September 2009. The major driver in this category this year has been an increase in staff retirements this year, offset by a decrease in salary expenditures due to open positions in the City Manager's office. Public safety expenditures are 73% of budget for 2010, which is right where we expect them to be and an increase from the September 2009 rate of 70 %. Public works expenditures total 67% of budget for 2010, which is a decrease from the 2009 rate of 69 %. The difference is mostly from reduced personnel costs due to a couple of retirements that occurred in the third and fourth quarters of 2009 and open positions that were not filled due to uncertain economic conditions. Parks expenditures are 71 % of budget so far this year, which is a decrease from the September rate of 75% in 2009. The parks department can have a spending pattern that is somewhat seasonal, and it can vary from year to year and quarter to quarter. Nondepartmental and other expenditures decreased from the prior year due to timing differences in overall insurance payments. We distribute these insurance expenditures to other departments through our Central Services function at the end of the year as part of the annual audit process, so large variances during the year can be common. &T &L's\Investment Advisory Committee\20I O \Quarterly Update.docx J! 1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA •,K�• Quarterly Financial Update September 2010 General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and.Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 Expenditures: General government 4,323,616 2010 (1,217,910) 2009 212,549 Public safety 13,865,913 10,141,905 Over/ 10,071,380 Increase/ Public works Budget Actual (Under) Actual (Decrease) Revenues: 3,755,473 2,653,704 (1,101,769) 2,792,969 (139,265) Taxes (1) $ 20,115,348 $ 10,311,103 $ (9;804;245) $ 10,188,609 $ 122;494 Licenses and permits (2) 2,231,760 1,804,751 (427,009) 1,577,169 227,582 Intergovemmental (3) 757,000 354,480 (402,520) 431,378 (76,898) Charges for service (4) 2,702,268 1,729,104 (973,164) 1,558,813 170,291 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 775,953 (174,047). 768,243 7,710 Other reeenues 441,382 399,471 (41,911) 373,200 26;271 Total revenues 27,197,758 15,374,862 (11,822,896) 14,897,412 477,450 Expenditures: General government 4,323,616 3,105,706 (1,217,910) 2,893,157 212,549 Public safety 13,865,913 10,141,905 (3,724,008) 10,071,380 70,525 Public works 6,017,856 4,033,433 (1,984,423) 4,273,921 (240,488) Parks 3,755,473 2,653,704 (1,101,769) 2,792,969 (139,265) Other - (48,951) (48,951) (32,883) (16,068) Total expenditures 27,962,858 19,885,797 (8,077,061) 19,998,544 (112,747) Revenues over (under) expenditures (765,100) (4,510;935) (3,745,835) (5,101,132) 590,197 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out)' Liquor fund (5) . 765,100 - (765,100) - - Construction fund (6) - - - - - Sale of capital assets - 2,281 2,281 - 2,281 Total other financing source 765,100 2,281 (762,819) - 2,281 Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ - $ (4,508,654) $ .(4,508,654) $ (5,101,132) $ 592,478 1 The City receives the first property tax payment from the County in June and the second; payment in December. 2 The licenses and permits category includes building permits. 3 The intergovernmental category includes grants from Federal, state and county sources. Generally, most of the grants the City receives are reimbursement grants, which means that if grant revenue increases, expenditures must also increase by an equal or greater amount. 4 Charges for services includes ambulance revenue. 5 The annual liquor fund transfer is always made in December. 6 The annual construction fund transfer is always made in December. i G:\P &L's \Investment Advisory Committee\20IO \Quarterly Update.docx 2 Members Prese Arnie Bigbee John Cashmore Lisa Finsness Jessi Kingston Bob Mayer Meg Newell Russ Stanton EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2010 7:00 PM —COMMUNITY ROOM Members Absent Staff Zack Antar, Student Susan Howl Daria Brosius, Student Meeting Agenda Approved. Member Stanton seconded Member Kingston's motion to approve the meeting agenda for 10- 26 -10. The motion carried. Commission Minutes Approved Member Finsness seconded the motion of Member Kingston to approve the Commission minutes as presented for September 28, 2010. The motion carried. Edina Community Council Report Presented Member Finsness shared agenda items of the latest Community Council meeting: The Commissioners were asked to save the date for a breakfast event on December 1n from 7:30 to 9 AM at Braemar Clubhouse. The event will highlight the needs of Edina youth related to poverty, which is one of the community gaps identified by the Edina Community Council. Along with the Community Council and the Resource Center, sponsors include the Edina Community Foundation and Connecting With Kids. The age of youth highlighted will be pre- school through ninth grade. Chair Bigbee agreed to be a table host for the event. E -vites will be coming out soon to the Commission. CAPSH (Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin) made a presentation to the Council. CAPSH strives to provide assistance to the low income population through a variety of services and programs. Member Finsness remarked that HRRC could prepare a pamphlet highlighting stats of the City and success stories of the Resource Center which would be shared with community groups. Member Finsness encouraged HRRC to prepare for a January presentation to the Community Council. This would warrant an immediate meeting with Jennifer Bennerotte to acquire a template for a PowerPoint. Anti - Bullying /Cyber Bullying Subcommittee Update Presented Member Newell shared a handout representing background and ways to look at, share and make a statement concerning bullying activities. The first week in Minnesota was observed as National Bullying Prevention Awareness Week. Looking at the chart, Member Newell recommended focusing on the "Voluntary/Internally Enforced" quadrant. • Efforts need to aim for the infrastructure, with an emphasis on providing reoccurring opportunities for Edina youth to become known as leaders in this arena. • Member Finsness's video from the Osseo schools on bullying could become a school May -term project. The video shows kids talking to kids about internet safety. If taken on by the Edina students, the video could be refreshed every year. • The Commission questioned its role regarding the schools as it entertains the issue of bullying — perhaps open it up to the public and work jointly with the schools. • Anti - bullying PSA's could be developed by students for Channel 16 and run before Council meetings. • It was noted that one of the key audiences is young people. There is the need to partner with them, work with them and have creative activities with them. • A goal would be to have a City proclamation. • The Art Center could collaborate with student's designs along with creative writing projects. • The youth could help design, promote and wear anti - bullying pins. • An initial step to take would be to challenge the youth that it is "uncool" to be a bully. The first messages of this sort would be targeted to students. • HRRC would be a catalyst to raise public awareness about bullying and to facilitate social change against this cruel action. • Before the Commission begins anything, it is necessary to have a discussion with the schools. The Commissioners requested that there be tangible actions listed in each of the quadrants of Member Newell's chart. Comparisons of Cities' Funding Processes Shared in a Grid Based on a staff survey of other suburban cities' funding procedures for human services, Member Mayer reported that most do not delegate the responsibility of proposing a human services budget to a commission. If the City Council expects the Commission to continue recommending an annual budget, HRRC must get more involved with the funding of the Resource Center so that it doesn't become a rubber stamp procedure. The Commission would be interested in learning whether the City Council sees the entire funding process with HRRC's recommendations as necessary. Perhaps the members of the Community Health Committee could offer their expert opinions when the time comes to evaluate unmet needs in the community and how the City could allocate funds for human services. Work Plan Discussed Chair Bigbee pointed out that the Work Plan would now be included at each Commission meeting for review —as an occasional "skull session." It was noted that the next important item of business was a visit by Joyce Repya, Associate Planner, to the November meeting to discuss the CDBG funding process. Domestic Partnership Unfinished Business Discussed • Consider cities' ability to define their own insurance policies for staff. To get started, another meeting with Phil Duran will be arranged. • Consider changing words in the ordinance related to City contracts: i.e. "in the case of a tie, the award goes to the contractor who supports domestic partnerships." HRRC Pending List Explained To keep the Commission on track with unfinished /upcoming business, the Members were reminded to keep the List alive by adding things to it whenever anything comes up. New Business Identified • Because the Commissioners voted by e-mail to change the November meeting date from the 23rd to the 301h, Scott Neal will be notified by staff regarding his November visit to HRRC. • Member Kingston second Member Stanton's motion to change the December meeting date from the 281h to the 14th. The motion carried. • Any Commissioner may attend the State Conference on December 3`d without expense because of Bremer funds being available once again. • The Southern Poverty Law Center will be sponsoring the premier of a film entitled "Bullied" at a church in Minneapolis on Tuesday, November 91h. Chair Bigbee indicated that invitations are forthcoming. Member Kingston seconded Member Stanton's motion that the City Council amend the attendance policy for boards and commissions in the City,Code for the consideration of excused absences due to serious medical conditions. The motion carried with two Commissioners abstaining. Meeting Adjourned There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM. Edina Public Art Committee - MINUTES - 1017/10 Community Room, Edina City Hall, 4:00p.m. Present: Bernice Amacher, Brad Benn, Rick Fesler, Naomi Griffith, Diana Hedges, Amy Kerber, Bill McCabe, Lois Ring, Anne Spooner and Ruth Valgemae. September minutes accepted as corrected. FINANCIAL REPORT: Lois Ring reported a total of $423 in button sales. Diana Hedges reported that at the recent City Council working session, members of the City Council were very supportive of Edina Public Art and she is hopeful regarding funding for 2011. Lois Ring thanked Diana Hedges for making the presentation at the recent City Council meeting. Diana Hedges also reminded everyone about Taste of Creativity, a silent auction taking place November 4th to raise funds that will benefit EAC, EPAC and Fairview Auxiliary. She encouraged all to attend this important event. CONTINUING BUSINESS: Lois Ring presented a draft of the insert promoting public art and the Edina Art Center's Media Studio to go into the utility bill. This is a great co -effort between EAC and EPAC; a total of 15,000 inserts will be distributed. Fees for this will come out of the Phil Johnson EAC Media Studio budget. Edina Promenade and Grandview CALL FOR SCULPTURES: Brad Benn suggested waiting to send the letter until we know what will be in our budget. Once we have income from the city, the CALL FOR SCULPTURES letter will be sent pending final approval. Voting results are in with 294 ballots received. Fifty -eight people provided their e-mail address so they can be notified of the results. Brad Benn explained the voting process: first choice received 3 points; second -2 points; third -1 point. If someone voted for 3 but did not rank them, each received 1 point. The following results have been approved: U Results: Title Artist Points The Plunge Deb Zeller 273 Reflecting on Friendship Nicholas Legeros 233 Holy Big Bird Stephen J. Fischer 212 Entrega Total Guillaume 192 Rider of the 4 Directions Three Trees Time Piece Bridled Spirit Head of St. Joseph Toro Gordon Van Wert 164 Kevin Komadina 091 Dean Holzman 090 Deb Zeller 089 Nicholas Legeros 069 Chris Gustafson 041 The Plunge will receive $1,000 for first place, Reflecting on Friendship will receive $750 for second place and Holy Big Bird will receive $500 for third place. Lois Ring will notify the winners and Dick Crockett will send the checks to the winners. Lois Ring and Naomi Griffith are also working on a marketing letter to send to possible donors for sculptures. Since the current EPAC budget is unclear, Diana Hedges offered a loan /transfer of funds in order to pay the artists if necessary. Lois Ring and Naomi Griffith presented copies of the patron letter to proof. Changes and updates were made. It was also decided that copies will be made as needed, rather than having a large number printed, which was very costly. A list of potential donors will be presented at the next meeting and also to the Ways & Means Committee for approval. DONATIONS /MEMORIALS POLICIES: Lois Ring reported that according to the year 2000 policy, donations greater than $300 but less than $5,000 do not receive permanent plaques. Donations of $5,000 or more do receive a bronze plaque. KODIAK SCULPTURE UPDATE: Brad Benn reported some rough estimates for a realistic dog sculpture. Several sculptors gave estimates ranging from $7,000 to $75,000, depending on size. Motion carried to send out a call, pending the Crime Fund approval. Lois Ring recommended that the one artist who offered a discount, include a full price quote and make a donation to EPAC if the artist desires. Diana Hedges said there is a Police Department liaison who will be working on this project with EPAC. The question was raised: Is it a memorial to Kodiak or recognition of the value of police canines? No decision was made at this time as to the best location. Diana Hedges mentioned that an original goal of EPAC was to have more public art at City Hall. All agree that the sculpture should be placed in a prominent area. Possible locations are: Centrum, Promenade, City Hall, Braemar and Edinborough Park. MEMBERSHIP: A member of the Edina Community Foundation might join us due to the membership status of Dick Crockett. Lois Ring is still looking for a committee member to head up EPAC membership. Lois Ring reported that Edina Sun - Current had an article on the gifts of Minn Eco Turtle and Time Piece. Edina Magazine will feature an article in the October 2010 issue and the Star Tribune also featured an article 'on Time Piece with photo. Anne Spooner created a current EPAC roster; some changes were made to it. An updated roster will be generated to members. NEW BUSINESS: Letterhead final corrections will be made by Naomi Griffith & Brad Benn. Large quantities can be generated at EAC. John Keprios was contacted by Edina resident Joyce Repya, regarding a sandstone lion sculpture (originally from the New York Life building located on the corner of 6th and Minnesota Street, St. Paul). Joyce Repya, owner of the lion would like to donate it to a civic organization. John Keprios asked EPAC to recommend a location for it. The lion sculpture is 1100 pounds and measures 36" wide by 40" tall and 10" thick with 20" thickness at its top. EAC is interested in placing it at the Greer Garden. Motion was made to accept the lion, provided Park and Recreation will transfer it to EAC where it will be until a permanent location is determined. Motion carried. Lois Ring requested that the Mosaic Project needs to be put back on the Action List and be included as part of next year's Promenade. The County has not yet approved it for the York Avenue Bridge. Meeting adjourned at 5:30p.m. Next meeting will be Wednesday, November 10, 4:00p.m. Minutes taken by Anne Spooner.